1 FARAD CONSTITUTION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.94/2007 Sangita Rameshwar Rindhe ...Versus... The State of Maharashtra through its Secretary and another --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [S/Shri S.J. Khandalkar & R.N. Meshram, Advs. for petitioner] [Shri Gopal Mishra, Adv. for respdt.No.2] CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 01.08.2007. The grievance of the petitioner is that the representation made by petitioner despite direction issued by this Court has not been considered in accordance with law. Today Advocate Shri Gopal Mishra appeared for respondent No.2 and has placed xerox copy of communication dated 25.1.2007, which is marked as “X” for identification, in which it is stated that there is no provision of reservation for widow in the Category of Section 7. He says that the representation has been decided. 2 Advocate Shri Mishra is directed to serve xerox copy of this communication to the petitioner, who is at liberty to file appropriate proceedings, if so advised. In so far as present contempt petition is concerned, the same now does not survive in view of this statement. Statement accepted. Contempt Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE ssw