IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.6397 of 2009 Date of Decision : September 22, 2011. Ritu Ragini .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Sandeep Jasuja, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks quashing of the Advertisement dated 29.8.2007 (Annexure P-10) qua the recruitment of Educational Services Providers, to the extent it provides that only those candidates shall be eligible for the posts of English Masters/Mistresses who had 'English' as an elective subject in graduation. She further seeks quashing of the order dated 3.10.2008 vide which the legal notice issued on her behalf has been decided by respondent No.2. During the course of hearing learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the controversy involved in this case stands settled by this Court vide order dated 11.8.2011 passed in CWP No.4379 of 2008 CWP No.6397 of 2009 [2] (Sukhpal Rani versus State of Punjab and another). The writ petition is accordingly allowed in terms of the afore- stated decision of this Court in Sukhpal Rani's case (supra). Dasti. September 22, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE