0312wp4571.09.odt 1/1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4571 OF 2009 (RAMESH MATHAJI DHANWATE VS. THE HEAD MASTER & SECRETARY, SCHOOL COMMITTEE & 3 OTHERS) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Mr. S. V. Khondalay, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R. L. Khapre, Advocate for respondent No. 1. CORAM: D. D. SINHA & F. M. REIS, JJ. DATED : 03rd DECEMBER, 2009. Heard. The writ petition is directed against show cause notice dated 09/10/2009 issued by respondent No. 1, whereby the petitioner is called upon to explain why his services should not be terminated since his caste claim is invalidated. Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the appointment of the petitioner is not from the reserved category, and therefore, question of terminating the services of the petitioner on the ground of invalidation of his caste claim does not arise. Be that as it may, the petitioner has approached this Court against the impugned notice as he was not offered opportunity to explain these facts to the respondent-management. The Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has already submitted the reply to the management. Mr. Khapre, learned Counsel for respondent No. 1 states that the reply of the petitioner, if already submitted, shall be considered on its own merit and according to law and respondent No. 1 shall take decision accordingly. In the circumstances, nothing survives in the petition and the same is disposed of accordingly. wwl JUDGE JUDGE