IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17408 of 2009 RAJU KUMAR SINGH @ RAJEEV KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 01.09.2009 Heard both sides. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted under Sections 328, 304B and 34 of Indian Penal Code. It is contended that subsequent to the filing of the case, the informant himself approached the authorities and made application that the case was lodged on certain mis-conception of the information. It is further contended that an application in this regard has been filed in the court as well as before the Superintendent of Police. By filing supplementary affidavit, the petitioner has stated that the investigating officer of the case has made inquiry and recorded the statement of the informant wherein the position was clarified by the informant who is brother of the deceased. It is contended that the matter is still under investigation. Having regard to the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner, this court is persuaded to dispose of the application in the following manner: The petitioner above named shall be released on bail on his surrender within four weeks in the court below on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., West Muzaffarpur in connection with Paroo P.S. case 2 no. 25 of 2007 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure. The said privilege is confined to the period of investigation only. No sooner the charge-sheet/final form will be submitted, the present order shall seize to exist. With this observation, this application stands disposed of. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )