-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.22082 OF 1992 APPEAL ST.NO.22082 OF 1992 APPEAL ST.NO.22082 OF 1992 ............................................................. ............................................................. ............................................................. Office Notes,Office Office Notes,Office Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, memorandum of Coram, memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s appearances,Court’s appearances,Court’s Court’s Court’s Court’s or or or orders or directions orders or directions orders or directions Judge’s Judge’s Judge’s orders orders orders & Registrar’s orders. & Registrar’s orders. & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. ............................................................. ............................................................. Mr.C.M.Lokesh i/b Mr.G.S.Hegde for the Appellant CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : FEBRUARY 6,2007. : FEBRUARY 6,2007. : FEBRUARY 6,2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate for the Appellant. The Application for condonation of delay already stands dismissed as against the Respondent no.2. The Respondent No.2 was one of the four claimants before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The impugned Award passed by the Tribunal has attained finality in so far as the Respondent No.2 is concerned. The Award proceeds on the ground which is common to all the claimants. Therefore, the Appeal does not survive as against the other claimants, as there cannot be two inconsistent Awards in the same claim petition. Hence, Appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. -2- JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE