EFORE THE HON BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISG B A ' CrA NO w 2 /2009 ‘ APPELLANTS REsPéNbEm AT BILASPUR :1 Chandulat Chandrakar S/o 'Nar Chandrakar aged about 29 ye Occupation Agnculture ‘ Rlkhlram Chandrakar S/o Nars Chandrakar aged about 21 ye ,OccupaUon Agrlculture Both R/o Vlllage Kamraud Kurud Distnct Dhamtarl (C G ) VERSUS The Sta‘te of Chha‘tt'isgarh, 'thr' P.S.” Kurud, , Dhamtari Di ‘Dhar‘ntalji (C‘.G.) / RIMINAL. P‘Rocenu‘r‘z C e. s ‘ a m a ‘ ou st WW WW(W> . ' e‘‘aifaq-mw .3: HON’BLE JUSTICE M PRITINKER DIWAKER 1-2009 ’ Shn Goutam Khetrap i counselforthe appellants Shn Suresh Verma c unsel for complainant Shn Pankaj Shrlvasta a Panel Lawyerfwthe State Appellants Chandu al Chandrakar and Rikhi Ram are present in person and they ar ldent.i“ed by S n eoutam '(l‘etrapal Advocate. Complainants Keiu am Dhuve Ansma Bal Dhurve and Salik Ram Dhurve are also present in person and they too are identified by ShriSuresh V rma Advocate I have already settled their dispute amicably out side the court. They further submit that the compromise being sought for between them and the complainants is voluntarily and Without any pressure from anyone I ln this View of the matter the appiications mentioned above are altowed and theyompromtse desired by the parties I is permitted to be entered ito l < llNe 74 / W 2w l IA Nos 1 2 3 and j have been made by the parties for offences. ermissmn to compound th LA; No. 1 has'been ti ed jointly by'the appellants and the complainants duly supported by their affidavits. it has been stated by the appellants thdt theybeing the members of same locality do not want to_ proseicute the case any‘further and they 5 07 1 p n (4; :ompromise would be the acquittal of . 1ces punishable under Sections 294 & >rdingly. . Scu- Pritinker Diwaker r Judge The resuit of this ¢ the appellants'of the offel‘ 323/34 IPC. Ordered accw WW W200 mmqqmw) ’1K'WWW WHWW. mmm WW WW amirawiaw