IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.548 of 2008 ACHAL KUMAR SINHA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. KANAK KUMARI ----- 2 5.12.2008 Heard learned counsel for both parties. Perused the impugned order dated 6.5.2008 passed by Sri A. K. Srivastava, Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Barh in Complaint Case No. 375© of 1999. In course of submission learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 submitted that he had no objection if only those documents be marked on behalf he defence which were admitted by the informant/complainant in cross examination i.e. documents of Matrimonial Suit. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this revision application is allowed and the impugned order is set aside. The court below is directed to take into evidence the documents which have already been filed by the defence and admitted by the informant. No other documents or oral evidence shall be allowed to be adduced by the defence. B.Jha (Ghanshyam Prasad)