mGH COURT OF CHEATTISW, BEASPUR , w.r. gs! no.4s99moo7 S.K. shrivas, s/o Shri Mahavger Shrivas, aged about 59 years», Occupation — Tahsjldat Tahsil‘ Manpur, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ’ 1. State Secretary, of ChhattiSgarh Revenue, Thtougl Departmant, the g ‘7 D.K.S. Bhawau, Raipur (C.G.) Versus 2. Collector, Rajnandgaon (0G) T PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF T33 W GOHSTITUTIOE'OF INDIA W EpwmEce: SUM. KUMAR Hcani. ORAL ORDER (08.03.2007) J Learned counsel for the pctiu‘oner argues that even after issuance of the order of transfer dated 19.6.2007, the mspondants am got relieving the petiu'oner 1i11 date. However, after arguing for some ume, he prays for withdrawal of this petih'nn on the ground that most probably 5}/; mnew the prayer once again. Prayer is allowed. However, the peiiu'oner For the time being, the petition is permitted to be withdxawn. shall be at liberty to repeat his prayer in case any fl the petitioner would be relieved in near future. He also prays that if the nansfer. order is not emted in near future, he may be granted liberty to Shri Rakesh Pandey, Counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ajay DWivedi, P.L , for the State on advance copy: V w.r. {sy No.4599/2067 cause of ac11'on pertaining to the said transfer order an'ses in his favour in futme. This pttiu'on stands $13113? disposed ofwith the above observatinn. At this stage, it is bmught to the notice of this Gourt that a Caveat Pcu’tion No.448/07 has also been med. .marned counsel for. the State submits that the caveat has been Eed against the petitions whichiaxe ta be med against the order of u‘ansfer, therefore, it is inhuctuous for the pmsent petition. Accordingly, the caveat also stands d1scharged Ran Sd/- \ ‘ Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge