IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 30TH JULY 2009 / 8TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 21517 of 2009(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ JOSE, S/O.LATE JOSEPH, AGED 45 YEARS, THUNDATHIL HOUSE, PERINGAVU DESOM, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.C.A.CHACKO SMT.C.M.CHARISMA SRI.N.A.SHAFEEK SRI.K.S.SALEESH RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE SPECIAL SALE OFFICER, C0-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (OFFICE OF ASSISTANT REGISTRAR), THRISSUR-1. 2. VILVATTAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.337, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, CHEROOR, THRISSUR-8. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 21517 OF 2009 (H) ===================== Dated this the 30th day of July, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that his mother had availed of a loan from the 2nd respondent offering sureties for the same. It is stated that his mother and the sureties have expired, and now revenue recovery proceedings have been initiated against the self acquired properties including movables belonging to the petitioner. It is stated that on receipt of the proceedings for the recovery of the amount, he has filed Ext.P3 before the 1st respondent and that ignoring the same, proceedings are being continued. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, the properties against which the proceedings are now initiated are his self acquired properties, obviously the said properties cannot be proceeded against. However, it is a matter for the 1st respondent to consider and decide. As according to the petitioner, he has filed Ext.P3 before the 1st respondent, I direct the 1st respondent to take note of Ext.P3 and consider the same, if that objection has been received, with notice to the petitioner, before further proceedings WPC 21517/09 :2 : for realisation of the liability of his mother is continued. 3. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the 1st respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp