IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.932 of 2008 SHIV NARAYAN PANDEY, S/O SRI RAM RIJHAWAN PANDEY R/O VILLAGE-MARANA TOLE AKASPURA, P.S. KHAJAULI, DISTRICT-MADHUBANI. -PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME (POLICE), 3. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL CUM INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, 4. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, DARBHANGA RANGE, DARBHANGA, 5. THE D.I.G. DARBHANGA. 6. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MADHUBANI. 7. THE OFFICER INCHARGE OF KHAJAULI P.S. MADHUBANI. -RESPONDENTS 1ST SET 8. HIRDYA NARAYAN THAKUR, S/O SRI BAIJNATH THAKUR, R/O VILLAGE MARANA TOLE, AKASPURA, P.S. KHAJAULI, DISTRICT-MADHUBANI. -RESPONDENTS 2 05.03.2009 It is the assertion of the petitioner that respondent no.8 has been charge sheeted showing him to be absconder but no effort is being made by the Police for his arrest. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Assistant Counsel to Additional Advocate General I, for the State, and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that the petitioner shall be well advised to approach respondent no.6, the Superintendent of Police, Madhubani, for the redressal of his grievance. Needless to state that in case petitioner 2 approaches respondent no.6, he shall ensure action in accordance with law without unnecessary delay. It is made clear that I have not expressed any opinion in regard to the claim made by the petitioner and that shall be considered by respondent no.6. Application stands disposed off with the observation aforesaid. (C.K. Prasad, ACJ.) AAhmad