IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13138 of 2008 PAPPU MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 7/7/2008 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequently, Section 395 I.P.C. was added. It has been submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. Petitioner’s name has come in the confessional statement of the co-accused persons who have already been granted bail by another Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 15014 of 2006 under Section 392 I.P.C. although the case is under Section 395 I.P.C. Considering that the co-accused persons have been granted bail, the petitioner Pappu Mahto is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati (Gaya) in connection with Imamganj P.S. Case No. 15 of 2005. S.Ali (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)