IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 76 OF 2008 MR. RAMCHANDRA G. N. MULE ... Petitioner Versus MRS. CIRILA M. R. PINTO AND 4 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. S. R. Rivonkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 17th December, 2008 P.C.: By this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner challenges issue of process by the learned Magistrate under Section 406 and 420 IPC r/w 34 IPC. There is no dispute that the impugned order is revisable. Mr. Rivonkar seeks leave to withdraw the application with liberty to pursue remedy of revision before appropriate Sessions Court. Mr. Rivonkar also submits that delay in filing revision application be condoned. 2. Since the impugned order is revisable, liberty is granted to the petitioner to avail remedy of revision before appropriate Sessions Judge. In so far as condonation of delay is concerned, I am not inclined to pass an order condoning the delay. If such an application is filed by the petitioner, the concerned Judge shall deal with the same and pass appropriate order. 3. Criminal Writ Petition stands disposed of. A. P. LAVANDE, J. lh/.