IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 28TH MAY 2010 / 7TH JYAISHTA 1932 WP(C).No. 13827 of 2008(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- BEENA, AGED 37 YEARS,W/O.BIJUMON HOUSE NO;866 WARD NO.9, KOTTARAKARA PANCHAYATH. BY ADV. SRI.K.MADHUSOODHANAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. THASILDAR (R.R.PROCEEDINGS)TALUK OFFICE, KOTTARAKARA. 3. JOINT R.T.O.KOTTARAKKARA. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MATHEW GEORGE VADAKKEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J -------------------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 13827 OF 2008 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of May, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers: (a) To issue a writ of certiorari or such other writ order or direction against the 2nd respondent quashing Ext.P2. (b) To issue a writ of mandamus or such other writ order or direction against the 2nd respondent to restore to the petitioner movables belonging to the petitioner seized by the 2nd respondent vide Ext.P1. (c) Pass any other order or direction against the respondents which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit to pass under the facts and circumstances of this Writ Petition. 2. The 2nd respondent has filed a statement wherein it is stated in paragraph 3 as follows:- “3. It is submitted that, before the auction was conducted, Sri.Thankachan, the father of Sri.Bijumon came forward to remit the amount on behalf of his son. An amount of Rs.37,200/- plus collection charges were remitted vide TR V NO.36/15 on 28.03.2008. Upon remitting the entire dues, the attached properties were released to Sri.Thankachen on proper receipt. Since the entire amount was remitted, further Revenue Recovery steps were not taken.” 3. There is no representation for the petitioner. The learned Government Pleader with reference to the contents of the statement as above, submits that, the matter has become infructuous. This Court finds that nothing further requires to be considered. The Writ Petition is dismissed accordingly. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE dnc