HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASfHJR M.A. ( Cl No. 279/2009 SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice R.L. Jhanwar APPELLANTS Non applicants RESPQNDENTS Narayan Prasad Pandey s/o Shri Kunj Bihari Pandey, aged abou(56 years, (owner) Smt. Jagat Jannani Pandey, w/o Shri Narayan Prasad Pandey, aged about 50 years (Owner) Both are r/o village Binta, Tahsil Jagdalpur, District Bastar (CG) Versus Smt. Mangaliw/o Late Mangal Ram, aged about43 years Panchu Ram s/o Late Mangal Ram aged about 14 years, Anil Kumar s/o Late Mangal Ram aged about10years, Respondent No. 2 and 3 are minors through natural guardian mother &nt. Mangali w/o Late mnagal Ram, All are Wo village Binta, Tahsil Jagdalpur, District Bastar (CG) Claimant Naresh @ Bal Gopal Pandey s/o Narayan Prasad Pandey, aged about22 years, R/o village Binta, Tahsil Jagdalpur, Djstrict Bastar (CG) Driver The Oriental Insurance Com(»ny Limited, Branch Office, Main Road, Sadar Bazar Jagdalpur, District Bastar(CG)- Insurer SMs-Me: ^ APPEAL U/S 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Appearance: None for the appellants. None for respondents No. 1 to 4. Shri Shailendra Sharma, counsel for respondentN<».5. ORAL ORDER • : • : — (28.08.2010) 1. The appeal was calted out for hsaring in first rotnd. Even in ttie second round also when the appeal is called out, none ^iad appeared on behaff of the appellants nor any representation te made. It appears that the appellants do not want to prosecute this appeal anymore. Consequently, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 2. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for warrt ofproseeution. .^ - Sd/- R.E. Jhanwar Judge