CRM No. M 24346 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 24346 of 2010 Date of decision: 17.11.2010 Rajesh Kumar ........ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. C M Munjal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. P S Bajwa, DAG, Punjab for the respondent State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 73 dated 24.07.2010 under section 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Bareta District Mansa. It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner bought the land in question after paying the sale consideration. It is also stated that as per the revenue record, the sale deed does not mention any khasra number and therefore, it cannot be said that the same is Jumla Mushtarka Malkan. CRM No. M 24346 of 2010 2 Learned State counsel has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the said khasra numbers have been specifically left out from the sale deed and on the spot inspection, it was found that the petitioner is in possession of the land on the basis of sale deed which belongs to Jumla Mushtarka Malkan. The entire dispute revolves around the documentary evidence. It is a matter of evidence as the land in dispute is Jumla Mushtarka Malkan or not. Moreover, the petitioner is stated to have joined the investigation. In view of the above, the order dated 23.08.2010 passed by this Court is made absolute. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge November 17, 2010 mohan