IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.801 of 2006 LALA RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 6 13.5.2008 The writ petitioner – appellant being aggrieved by the order dated 27.09.2006 passed in CWJC. No.7014 of 2006 dismissing the writ application has preferred this appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent. The writ petitioner – appellant is a driver and on re- organization of the State on the basis of the principles fixed by the Advisory Committee, he was allocated to the State of Jharkhand. He challenged the same before this court, which has given rise to the impugned order. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State as also learned counsel for the Union of India. Learned Single Judge taking into account the fact that the writ petitioner – appellant’s allocation to the State of Jharkhand is on the basis of the principles fixed by the Advisory Committee, did not interfere with the order of allocation. We do not find any error in the same so as to call for interference in the present appeal. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed. (Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, ACJ.) Neyaz/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)