c<^' 2^-5 't.t'St INTHE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.fSt N0. 16 f3 /2010 PETITIONERS 6r> .-''>€ /y7/ oy ..•• .^iil& ^%y <)s'^y /<f~^ <iW ^- RESPONDENTS 1.' Smt. Sheeliya Khalkho W/o Virendra Tirkey, aged about 38 years, working as Head Master, Girl s Primary School, Sitonga, Block Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 2. Dhanesh Kumar Dhiwar, S/o Late Shri Aaju Ram Dhiwar, aged about 37 years, working as Head Master Girl's Primary School, Ludeg, Block Paththalgabn, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jashpur, Distt.- Jashpur (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Block - Jashpur Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) (g) 4. Block Education Officer, Block - Paththalgaon Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 5. Treasury Officer, Treasury Account & Pension Jashpur, Distt.-Jashpur (C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA -^-l^. tw^^*»'*—^J^aj B(l(3WEe »lffi®^lllHlirailg(SBitMI;BltasP't.K •'WRlBl'iMWliBfisHiMil^OT^^ PeUUonere Smt.SheetiyaKhallcHeaidanother .Versus'.',:.::- -:•" :.;; :'::' ;^ ItesDOndents ^State <rf GhhaittisgiirBand olheiEs WRFT PETm©NUNBERAF^I@LE2%©RXHg©©l^ Single^(teh:Hon'b!eMRSaBsli;l^^i(i(ari<J.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ tKwiv»iMwmff<»»»mw^»i9^^^w^wiP*ii Presenfc- ;ShrlSo^l®rrtVem'la,>,6aln^^;fcH·t^ig^pSEitk^r»e^s. SimM.P.S.BhatB.ESy.aA.ftwtHeState. -C^fc;OI^E^.-;:::^::".;:::''"r':::-:!''^ (Passedonthis12ftofApnl,2^^ 1. By Ns petWon, the petiWnere'^ek a?(iirectidn teidNB liespondents^o pay two at^nceiriereniiBntsonpa^ngofB.T.I.exBnnnalion,^^ beS^eivtemisV^V^senwe^ ^ ' i 2. Learned counssl:appearing <Drlhe;pefitioneisi sutimte ttiattteisBU^iwolved mthepres^^caseisno^lor^^/^Awt^^a&U^^rW^^ and decidect by;theSupr^eC^uit]n?i4ste,Saaa^^ as v ll as by this'Coyrt in ^^mattw^t^ Mui^pa^^eatpoi'aS^'D^^ ~ SweGo^W<Wlw^ga si^snoW^ 3/ Leiametf^counset furthw $utmits^that^^ireBritii3elit!ow fe^s^ by ^xleCtsion ^restated^^us, fte rnakerepresentationstw^respondent^uthoritiesto.t^ye'Uielri^p^^^ casesfoTgrantofhvojncrementsiiTtlTO^HgN'ofafofe^tatM •:-^''.''"'.i::'f'::::IY te veriflcatJon pf the fact asto whether •ffie |^tBK)nei'8|'Havg iataElwretl' B.T.t.. -^rtiflcateontheirovme)q)enses^befoi»en^ 4. ^t^amed counsel appeanng^^fw th^ - eviBnt, ttepetitioneremal<&representatioite,lheWme^^ ,decjded, in a<»»idan(»:wjtt>tiaw ahd^^ SupremeCourttn<4a^SBi(?^;^s<iS(^a&w^^ Auwarfi^EuA^and (SqpesA^fflm^'Maa^ WW^fi^VheitateMtjeci^<^^Te^e^^ i 5. In view of foregoing.accprding.to the'learned^e^ appearii^ fejr the petitlonere, nottiing survhres in ths peiUtton foracljudicatitah. , S.Aocordinglytthewritpetitionistnsposedof. '2009ipI)MPJB.(S05? 220(»(H)MPJR-G096 3WP(gjiNo.4l30of20e5 Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge -;);'; ;i:~-: i!'