IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI FRIDAY, THE 26TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 5TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 34986 of 2010(W) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- RAGHAVAN.C.K,AGED 49 YEARS, S/O.POKKAN,RESIDING AT T.C.16/318, MYTHRI ASSOCIATES,JAGATHY,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUSEUM POLICE STATION,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CITY,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001. 3. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 4. IBRAHIMKUTTY.A.P,AGED 50 YEARS, PRESIDENT,AMM CHARITABLE SOCIETY, KULATHOOR JUNCTION,KAZHAKOOTTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS. R4 BY ADV. SRI.C.K.MOHANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.34986 OF 2010: PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1.TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 11.11.2010 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P2.TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.553/2010 OF THUMBA POLICE STATION. EXT.P3.TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 19.11.2010 SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. K.M.JOSEPH & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.34986 of 2010-W ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 26th day of November, 2010 J U D G M E N T K.M.Joseph, J. Petitioner has approached this Court seeking police protection for his life and property. Allegations are made against the 4th respondent. 2. We heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the 4th respondent and also the learned Government Pleader. 3. Learned counsel for the 4th respondent would submit that the 4th respondent will not cause any threat to the life of the petitioner. Besides recording this submission, we direct that, if there is any complaint of threat from the 4th respondent to the petitioner, and if it is brought to the notice of the first respondent, the first respondent will look into the same, and if the threat is found to be genuine, he shall provide necessary protection to the life of the petitioner as against the 4th respondent. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. (M.C.HARI RANI) JUDGE. MS