IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 18TH MARCH 2010 / 27TH PHALGUNA 1931 RPFC.No. 304 of 2009() ---------------------- MC.889/2008 of Family Court, Malappuram. .................... REVISION PETITIONER/COUNTER PETITIONER ------------------------------------------------------------------ ABDU RAHIMAN @ BAVA, AGED 31 YEARS, S/O. KHADER, PARAKKATTIL HOUSE, MUTHUTHALA AMSOM, PORAKKAD DESOM, PATTAMBI TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.K.MUHAMMED SALAHUDHEEN RESPONDENTS / PETITIONERS --------------------------------------------- 1. RAMLATH, AGED 25 YEARS, D/O. SAIDALAVI, PARAYANTE VALAPPIL HOUSE, OTHALUR AMSOM, CHIYANUR DESOM, P.O.KOKKUR, PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. MOHAMMED RASHID, MINOR, AGED 7 YEARS, S/O. ABDU RAHIMAN @ BAVA, REPRESENTED BY MOTHER 1ST RESPONDENT. 3. RAMSHIYA(MINOR), AGED 5 YEARS, S/O. ABDU RAHIMAN @ BAVA, REPRESENTED BY MOTHER 1ST RESPONDENT. ADV. SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL FOR R1-3 THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N. KRISHNAN, J ----------------------------------- R.P.F.C. NO. 304 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 18th day of March, 2010. J U D G M E N T It is submitted by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner on instructions that the matrimonial dispute between the parties are settled and they are living together. In the light of the said statement the RPFC is dismissed as settled out of court. If there is any MCS statement on the instructions. I give an opportunity to the counsel for the revision petitioner to move an application to reopen the case. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. pm