1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Revision Application No.221/2006 Kisan Rajaram Khodke Vs. . State of Mah. and 3 others ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM : A.P. LAVANDE, J. DATED : 22nd April, 2008. Heard Mr. Mardikar, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Jichkar, learned A. P. P. for respondent no.1. Mr. Deshpande, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 to 4. By this Criminal Revision Application, the applicant, who is the father of the deceased Ayodhya takes exception to the judgment and order dated 27th June, 2006 passed by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Washim in Sessions Trial No. 88/05 acquitting respondent no.2 to 4 for offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 306, 304-B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The main ground on which the acquittal has been recorded by the trial court is that Ayodhya expired on 30.10.2004 and the F.I.R. was filed on 27.4.2005. The trial Court held that gross unexplained delay of almost six 2 months was fatal to the prosecution case. I find no perversity or illegality in the findings recorded by the trial Court. Hence, no case is made out for interference in exercise of Revisional Court jurisdiction. Hence, the revision is dismissed. JUDGE Ambulkar