IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27574 of 2010 DINESH RAJBANSHI, SON OF LATE MAHO RAJ BANSHI @ BARHO RAJBANSHI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 342, 307, 302, 427 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 3/5 of Explosive Substance Act. It has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 8.2.2005 since the petitioner’s name transpired during investigation but without any specific overt act. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional District Judge, F.T.C. II, Nawada, in Sessions Trial No. 143 of 2003/25 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other shall be the brother/mother of the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner 2 is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The fact that the petitioner is an accused in only two other cases presently besides the present one will be verified by the Magistrate before releasing the petitioner on bail. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)