1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.356 OF 2007 Jayashree Anaji Shedge .. Petitioner Versus Shedge Brothers Engineering Works & Anr. .. Respondents Mr.Bodke with Mr.C.M.Gangan for petitioner Mr.K.K.Jadhav for respondents. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 30th October 2007. P.C. . At the hearing of this petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation 2 Act, the petitioner and respodnents who are basically related to each other, have arrived at a settlement and their disputes and claims are finally settled between them. Consequently, both agree that there need not be any reference to Arbitration and the petition, therefore, would not survive but can be disposed of in the light of the consent terms. 2. The consent terms signed by the petitioner and respondents recording reciprocal obligations, taken on record and marked "X" for identification. Petitioner and respondents confirm their signatures below the same. It appears from the signatures that parties do not normally write and read in English but they have been fully explained in the language familiar to them. Mr.Bodke and Mr.Jadhav make a statement that the terms have been fully explained to their respective clients. They have fully understood the implications thereunder. Further, they have 3 no grievance of any nature against each other. The terms are signed by the ladies willingly and without any pressure or force from anyone, including any male member of the family. In such circumstancces, I am satisfied that the dispute between the parties are finally resolved. Order in terms of consent terms. Petition disposed of accordingly. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)