IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24874 of 2010 GANESH CHOUHAN SON OF LATE BIKU CHOUHAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 23.7.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioner is not named in the first information report but since he was the father of Sushant Chouhan by whom allegedly the niece of the informant had been kidnapped he has been implicated. The further submission is that the petitioner being the father of Sushant Chouhan is not involved in the kidnapping. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 20.4.2010, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in K. Hat (Madhubani) P.S.case No.98 of 2010, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iii) that the petitioner will be well - 2 - represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )