IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2867 of 2010 Mostt. Binda Devi & Ors. . Versus Mr. Santhel Kumar & Ors. . ----------- For the Petitioner: - Mr. Ramendra Prasad, Adv. For the P.M.C.:- Mr. Arun Kumar, Adv. ------------ 6. 03.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and for the Patna Municipal Corporation. Counsel for the petitioner does not deny compliance but seeks to urge that deduction from Petitioner no. 2 had wrongly been made of approximately Rs. 31,600/- from his dues. The very fact that deduction has been made is but an express acknowledgment that a credit was first given and thereafter deduction has been made for some reasons. If the petitioner no. 2 is aggrieved with the reasons, the enquiry cannot be held in the present proceeding. The order stands complied when the credit was made. If the petitioner no. 2 is aggrieved by the deduction, his remedy lies in a fresh proceeding questioning the same. The application stands disposed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)