6&9 HIGI-I CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 2399 01‘2008 . Rajendra Singh Sikarwara aged about 32 years, son of Shri Bheekam Singh Sikarwar, presently working as Head Constable in 13‘“ Baitaliag C.A,F. Bango Distt. Korba, attached with S.T.F Jagdalpur (CG) PETITEONERS 2. Diliy Singh Silagh, aged about 32 years, son of Shxi Dwarika Siagh, presently working as Constab1e 9m Battalian Dantewada, C.A.F. B Company, Distt. Kabeerdham (CG) . Ram Siagh Thakur, aged about 54 years, son of Late Sln‘i Shyam Singh Thakur, presently working as Head Constable in Police Telecommunication Deptt Distt. Kabeerdham (CG) 4. Narayan Lal Kushwaha aged aboui 34 years, son of Sliri Jeevax1 Lal Kusliwalaa, yresently worldrig as Head Constable m 9m Bamiian CAR Damewada, Distt; Dantewada (CG) 5. Salish Kumax Cliaube, aged about 34 years, sous of Late Shri Sachidanand Chaube, presently working as Constable in 8f” Battalian, Rajnandgaon, Dim. Rajnandgaon (CG) 6, Narayan Das Yaclav, aged about 39 years, sorx of Shri Duryodhan Prasad Yadav, presently Working as Head Constable, 9th Baitalian, Dantewada, Disri. Dantewada (CG) VERSUS . State of Chhattisgarh, through ihe Chief Secretary, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS . State of Madhya Pradesh, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Madhya Pradesh, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (MP) “e 3. The Director General of l’oliee, l’oliee Head Quarter, Raipur (CG) 4. Director General of Police, Police Head Quarter, Bhopal (MP) 5. Director General of Chhattisgarh Armed Force, Head Quarter, Bhilai, Distt. Durg (CG) 6. Union of India through ~ Ministry of Personel, Public Grivences anci Pension Department of Personel and Training, Khan Market, New Delhi. WRIT l’ETlTlON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ETDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri V.Vijay, Advocate for the petitioners. Sliri Amrito Das, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No. l, 3 and 5. Shfi Kashif Shakeel, Advocate for the Union of India/respondenf’No. 6. g0 ORAL ORDER (Passed on 015E day of May, 2008) With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing tha matter finally. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that he does not want to press this petition on merit except that the petitioners be permitted to make a representation to the Committee in light of the judgment and order dated 17m April, 2007 passed by this Court in B.R.Godbole Vs. Municipal Corporation Durg arld others {2007(2) CGLJ 417}: to which learned counsel appearing for the respondent/State have no obj eetion. Aooordihgly, the petition is disposed of in the same terms i.e. the Committee so constituted is directeri to consider the representations made by the petitioners, if their representations are not considered earlier. In the event, if it is not considered eariier, the nesh representation may be considered, as early as possible within a period of four months nom the date of receipt of representation. This exercise on the part of the Government of India may be compieted within a period of four months from the date ofreceipt of a copy ofthis order, S - u Amit i Satieh K. Agnihotri Judge i I i