: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.786 OF 2007 Rajesh Rasiklal Reshamwala .. Appellant V/s. Vijay Harshadkant Mapara & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. J.S. Kini for the Appellant. Mr. Jayesh Bhatt for Respondent Nos.1 to 11. Smt. K.K. Soraan for the respondent-BMC. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 24 TH NOVEMBER, 2009. P.C.: 1. The Appeal from Order has been filed against the order dated 26th September, 2007 passed in Notice of Motion No.2783 of 2007 in L.C. Suit No. 2965 of 2007. The Appeal has been filed by the appellant-defendant No.2 who claims to be the landlord of the suit premises. It appears that the trial Court has while granting ad-interim relief observed that the landlord need not be heard since the Municipal Corporation would represent his case. : 2 : 2. In my opinion, this observation of the trial Court is incorrect. The appellant has been made a party-defendant in the Suit and, therefore, before any orders are passed, appellant-defendant No.2 must be heard in the matter. 3. The Appeal from Order is disposed of with the aforesaid directions. .......