...... ‘ I (4.1m IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ’ W.P.S NO. é 5 /201 PETITIONER /, . Smt. Sushma Shrivastava W/o Shri K.K.Shrivastava,Aged about 61 years, Principal Government High school badhiyatola, Distt: Rajnandgaon (C.G) VERSUS RESPONDENTS z/l. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. Distt. Raipur (C.G.) / 2. The Director Public Instruction, Chhattisgarh Government Raipur, Distt. z Raipur (C.G.) ,3. The District Education ofticer,Distt.Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH f BILASPUR WRIT PET!T!ON §$1 NO.693 OF 20.1 PETITIONER Smt. Sushma Shrivastava Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Singie Bench : Hon‘bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Deepak Jain, Advocate for the petrrioner. Shri Sushi! Dubey, Government Advocate for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 7"; day of February‘ 201 1) rievange of the petitioner in this petition isthat though she is entitied to receive two advance increments pursuant to passing of BEd. course: the same has not been granted to her. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is squareiy covered with number oi decisions passed by this Court including the decision of the Supreme Court in Ashe Saxena v. State of MP. & Othersf. Learned counsei further submits that in View of this judgment besides many others, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation before the respondent No.3, raising an her grievances. He also craves for a direction to the competent ’ authority to decide the said representation as expeditiously as possibie. Learned counsei appearing for the State assures that if a representation is made, the same shalt be decided in accordance with law, as early as possible. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid iiberty. However, if the petitioner makes a representation within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the competent authority shall decide the same within a further period oi two months from the date of its receipt, in accordance with law. Sd/- \ i Satish K. Agnihotri l l Judge ‘2009 (rm MPJR (so; 59 G