HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETI’l‘ION (C) No. 1060 of2009 PETITIONER : Jeewan Lal Sonkar: Son of Mahavir Sonkar. aged about 3O years, R/o Nagar Panchayai Gunderdehi, House No. 744, Tahsil Gmlderdehi, District Durg (C.G.)‘ VERSUS r RESPONDENTS : 1. State ofChhattisgarh: Through: The Secretary, Urban Development Mim'stly, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chhatisgarh State Election Cmmnission, through the Secretary, Mahanadi Khand, Mantralaya Patisar, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Colloctor/Distn'ct Election Officer. District Durg_(C.G.) Chief Executive Oificer: Nagar Panchayat Gunderdehi, District Durg, CG.) . Smt. Urna Yadav, Acting President, Nagar Panehayat Guilderdehi, District Durg (C.G.) WRIT FETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agmhotli, J. Present: Shri Sanjay Pate}, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No. 1 and 3. Shri Shashank Thakur, Advocate for the respondent No. 2. Shri ASKaehhwaha, Advocate for the respondent No. 4. ORAL ORDER (I’assed on 13m day of April, 2009) ’Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in viewofthe aver-merits made in para 2 and 3 ofthe return dated 24.03.2009, tiled by respondent No. 2 and 3, nothing survives for adjudication. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the other side have no obj ection. In view ofthe foregoing the petition stands disposed of. Consequently, LA. No. l, also stands disposed of. i k 1 Satish Kéi-gnihotri i ; 1 Judge 1 e t . \ .