IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN MONDAY, THE 14TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 23RD KARTHIKA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 984 of 2011(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.34272/2010 Dated 20/12/2010 .................... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS -------------------------- 1. V.C.DEVASSY, S/O. CHERIAN THE LATE, AGED 52 YEARS, CHOWARAN HOUSE, MATTOOR, KALADY P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. BEENA DEVASSY, W/O. V.C.DEVASSY, AGED 39 YEARS, CHOWARAN HOUSE, MATTOOR, KALADY P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.J.MATHEW SRI.THOMAS JOHN AMBOOKEN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 3 TO 5 --------------------------------- 1. AUGUSTHY, S/O. (FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS), AGED 54 YEARS, SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, LAND ACQUISITION (RAILWAY), PERUMBAVOOR-683 542. 2. JAYAKUMAR, S/O. PURUSHOTHAMAN, AGED 48, CHIEF ENGINEER/CONSTRUCTION, SOUTHERN RAILWAYS, ERNAKULAM JUNCTION-682 016, (REQUISITIONING AUTHORITY). 3. DEEPAK KRISHNAN IRS, (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS), GENERAL MANAGER, PARK TOWN, SOUTHERN RAILWAY HEAD QUARTERS, CHENNAI-1. ADV. SRI.C.S.DIAS, SC, RAILWAYS FOR R2 & R3 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Contempt Case.(C) No.984/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS ANNEXURE A1 : A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.34272 OF 2010(H) DTD.20.12.2010. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS NIL /True Copy/ vps PA to Judge P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. --------------------------- Cont. Case (C) No. 984 OF 2011 -------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondents herein have willfully violated the directions issued by this Court in Annexure A1 judgment in W.P.(C) No. 34272 of 2010. It is stated that notwithstanding the directions issued by this Court the respondents have not taken steps to obtain conveyance of the land belonging to the petitioners. When the contempt case came up for admission hearing today, Sri.P.J.Mathew, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that though belatedly the respondents have taken steps to obtain conveyance of the land belonging to the petitioner and the sale consideration has also been paid to them. In such circumstances, I find no reason to proceed further with this contempt case. It is accordingly closed. P.N.RAVINDRAN, (JUDGE) vps WPC No./2011 2