IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.CHELAMESWAR WRIT PETITION NO : 12070 of 1994 Between: Grande Gopalakrishna Murthy, S/o. Venkatesamaiah, R/o. Mallam(V&P),Chittamuru(M), Nellore Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Pinakini Grameena Bank,A.L.Nagar, rep.by it's chairman, Nellore Dist. 2 The Board of Directors ,Pinakini Grameena Bank Head Office, A.K.Nagar, Nellore. 3 The Pinakini Gramena Bank, rep.by its Branch Manager, Mallam Branch,Mallam(post), Chittamuru(M), Nellore dist. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the order of the disciplinary authority the 1st respondent herein Ref.No.76/400/IF/PD/93 dtg.6.9.93 and the consequential order of the appellate authority the 2nd respondent herein passed in Ref.No.110/400/IF/PD/93 dt.7.12.93 and quash the same as arbitrary, illegal and void. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.P.CHANDRAMOULI Counsel for the Respondents: MR.K.SRINIVASAMURTHY The Court made the following ORDER: The writ petition is filed with a prayer as follows: “To issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the order of the disciplinary authority, the first respondent, in Ref. No.76/40/IF/PD/93, dated 06.09.1993 and the order of the appellate authority, the second respondent herein, passed in Ref.No.110/400/IF/PD/93, dated 07.12.1993 and quash the same as arbitrary, illegal and void.” When the matter is taken up, the learned counsel for the petitioner proceeded to argue the matter with reference to the documents which are not filed into the Court. On the other hand, when questioned about the reliance on such documents, the learned counsel submitted that they are admitted documents. Obviously, the learned counsel for the petitioner proceeds on the basis that this Court need not look into the documents for deciding the case. I do not see any valid reason to proceed further with the writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. --------------------- 17.03.2005 ksld To 1 Pinakini Grameena Bank,A.L.Nagar, rep.by it's chairman, Nellore Dist. 2 The Board of Directors ,Pinakini Grameena Bank Head Office, A.K.Nagar, Nellore. 3 The Pinakini Gramena Bank, rep.by its Branch Manager, Mallam Branch,Mallam(post), Chittamuru(M), Nellore dist. 4 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{NS}