IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI FRIDAY, THE 11TH JUNE 2010 / 21ST JYAISTHA 1932 WA.No. 471 of 2008 -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.24192/2003 Dated 27/09/2007 .................... APPELLANT(S): PETITIONER: ------------------------------ M/S.JNANODAYAM SABHA, EDAKOCHI, KOCHI-6, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, M.D.PRAKASAN, S/O.DAMODARAN, AGED 42 YEARS, MANEZHATH HOUSE, EDAKOCHI. BY ADV. SRI.SHAJI P.CHALY RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS: --------------------------- 1. THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, ALAPPUZHA. 2. P.P.NISHA, PEEDIAKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, EDAKOCHI, KOCHI-6. 3. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. (ADDRESS CORRECTED) ADDRESS OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT IS CORRECTED AS CHIEF SECRETARY INSTEAD OF SECRETARY AS PER ORDER IN IA.530/08 DT. 17/6/2008. ADV. SRI.A.JAYASANKAR FOR R2 SRI.C.ANIL KUMAR FOR R2 GOVT.PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: A.K. Basheer & P.Q. Barkath Ali, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.A. No. 471 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 11th day of June, 2010 Judgment Basheer, J: When this case came up for consideration on March 24, 2010 it was submitted by learned counsel on either side that the matter has been compromised between the parties. The compromise petition dated March 18, 2010 was in fact filed by the parties indicating the terms of settlement, one of which was that the appellant would pay Rs.2,50,000/- to respondent No.2 towards full and final settlement of the claim in ID.No.25 of 2000 on the file of the Industrial Tribunal, Alappuzha. In the compromise petition it was further stated that a sum of Rs.75,000/- had already been paid to respondent No.2 on March 6, 2010 and a further sum of Rs.1,25,000/- would be paid by the appellant in two instalments of Rs.50,000/- and 75,000/-, respectively on April 30 and May 31, 2010. It was further agreed that the amount of Rs.50,000/- lying in deposit before the Industrial Tribunal Alappuzha will be permitted to be withdrawn by respondent No.2. 2. Today when the case is taken up for further consideration, learned counsel for the parties submit that the WA.471/2008 2 amounts which were agreed to be paid by the appellant had already been paid. What remains is only a sum of Rs.50,000/- which is now lying in deposit before the Tribunal. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has no objection in allowing respondent No.2 to withdraw the same from the Tribunal. The above submission is recorded. 4. The compromise petition is taken on record. It shall form part of this judgment. The Industrial Tribunal shall release the amount of Rs.50,000/- now lying in deposit, to respondent No.2. The Writ Appeal is closed. A.K. Basheer Judge. P.Q. Barkath Ali Judge. an.