IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.4792 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision : 17th November,2007. Satish Khatna & Anr ....Petitioners Versus Dharampal & Ors ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr.Chetan Mittal, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Vishal Garg, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.N.D.Achint, Advocate, for the respondents. * * * Sabina,J.(Oral) Plaintiffs have filed a suit for permanent and mandatory injunction. Along with the suit, an application for temporary injunction was filed. The said application was dismissed by the trial court,vide order dated 21.12.2007. The said order was upheld in appeal by the learned Additional District Judge vide order dated 25.02.2008. Hence, the present revision petition. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that his only grievance is that the defendants-respondents may not alienate the suit property during the pendency of the suit. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that the respondents no.2 and 3 have no intention of alienating the suit property. In these circumstances in Civil Revision No.4792 of 2008 (O&M) ..2.. order to avoid further litigation, the respondents no.2 and 3 are restrained from alienating the suit property during the pendency of the suit. This petition is disposed of accordingly. 17th November,2009 (SABINA) Seema-II Judge