IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2204 of 2009 DR.BASUKI NATH SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 13.2.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner, counsel for B.N.Mandal University and for Mithila University as also the State. In the opinion of this Court the grievance of the petitioner in the first instance as with regard to retirement benefit should be looked into by the authorities of the University. From the reading of the writ application, it appears that some of the payments of retirement benefit have been made but that is not up to the satisfaction of the petitioner. It also appears that the office of the Hon’ble Chancellor also had drawn the attention of the authorities of the University towards the grievance of non-payment of admitted retirement benefits of the petitioner but that too has not evoked any response. This Court, therefore, would direct the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith a copy of this order confining to his claim only to the retirement benefit and the Registrar of the 2 University after looking into the relevant records would direct for payment of admitted amount of retirement benefit within a period of three months from the date of filing of such a representation by the petitioner. The Registrar if for any reason finds any amount of retirement benefit, as claimed by the petitioner to be not admitted and thus not payable will record his reasons and communicate such order to the petitioner. With the aforesaid observation and direction this writ application, accordingly, stands disposed of. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/