,/@ HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTI8GARH. BUASPUR W.P. (81 Ho.7391 of 2007 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 2 RaTneshwar Prasad Sahu age about 48 years, Assistaat Teacher s/o Shri Kuber Singh Sahu, Govt Middte School Balsamuiid Block Bemetaia, District Dui^(CG) Versus State Govemment of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretaiy, Education Departanent, D.K.S. Birawan, District Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Beinetaia, District Dui^(CG) WRIT PBTITION UBDER ARTICI^ 226 OP THE CONSTITUTIOB OF INDIA ABoearance: Shri Soinkant. Verma, connsel for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State on advance copy. ORAL ORDBR (13.12.2007) SUWIL KUMAR SINHA, J Heard on adinission. I^camed counsel for the petitioner subniits that the petitioner has passed B.Ed. ejeaniination on his own expenses, therefore, 1ie is entifled to receive two advance increments according to circulars daterl 34.12.1998 and 01.03.1999. He also subinits fhat in inany identical inatters, the petitions have heen allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Tiashu»ant Kunuu' Bharadwtii Vs. Munictoal CorvorafSon, Dufa and another f3006 fCQ SltPJK-CG 961. He submits that the case ofthe petitioner is squarely covered liy the said jiidgmeTlt. Tbis legal positioo is not diaputed by the leamed counsel for ttie State. However, she siibtCtits that the ordcr niay he passed in tenns ofthf said judgment, hiit it sha1l he siihjected to verification regarding petitioner's such qnalification. •z- WP(S) 7391/2007 Accorrtingly, this writ petition is allowed in tenas of the order passcd in case of Yashisant Kumar BharaduHy Vs. Mwwipal Corpa/ralion, Ourg ccnd, another (Si-tpTa) siihyct to vcrification ofthe facts as to whefher the petitioner had acquircd B.Fxl, Exatniaation CertiGcate on his own expcnses as per ciTculars dated 24. 1.2.1998 aad 01.03.1999 aad further whetlier he has been paid two advance increinents or not. The petition stands finafly disposetLQf_Noorder as to costs. Sdf- Sunil Kumar Siuha ! Jiidge i^unita