ST^!'.?^5iS P^^^^^^E^^^-? HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR SB : HON'BLB SHRI JUSTIGB PRITINKER DIWAKER W.P. t227i N0. 2288/2009 V-; PBTITIQNER DefendantNo.4 yersus KBSPQNDENTS Plaintiff (Defendant No. 1) 2. Defendant No.2) 3. (DefendautNo.3) 4. 4.1 4.2 Prabhakar Rao, S/o. Narayan Rao, aged about 40 years, Occupation Agriculturist, VQlage Aclihoti Tab,. Kurud, resident of Abhanpur, Tahsil aad Distt. Raipiu-(CG) Baldau aUas Asliwaai Kumar, S/o. Makhaa Lsl Chandrakar, aged about 50 yeara, occupation Agricultuiist, r/o, Vfflage and Post Achhoti, Tah. Kurud, Disft. Raipur (CG) Makhan Lal, Sfo. Narsiag Prasad Chaadiakar, aged 70 years, Occupation Agriculturist, R/o. Vjllage and Post Acfalioti, Tah. Kurud, Distt.' Raipur (CG^) Thekram, S/o. Makhan Lal Chaiidrakar, aged 47 years, Occupation Agriculturist, R/o. Village and Post Achhoti, Tah. Kumd, Distt. Raipur(CG) Yash Kumar S/o. Makhaa Lal Chaadrakar, aged 45 years, Occupation Agriculturist, R/o. ViUage and PostAchhoti, Tah. Kurud, Distt. Raipur (CCr) Sitabai, Widow of Makhan. Lal, aged about 50 years, By caste Ctiaadrakar, R/p, Vittage aad Post Achhoti, Tah. Kurud, Distt. Dhamtari(CG) Ramat/Rama alias Shivnarayau S/o. Maarakhan/m.akhan aged about 37 years, by caste Chaadrakar, R/o. ViBage and ..tf» .,/'"-'.^^ '''^•fSSS-T: B ^.'<. ItS %'rf:1< :'"iihes^ ^2~^ 4.3 (Defendaat No.5) 5. (Defendaat No.6) 6. Post Achlioti, Tah. Kurud, Distt. Dhamtari (CG) Lachliu aiias Shivkum.ar S/o. Manrakhaii/inakhaD. scged about 37 years, by Caste Chaadrakar, R/o. ViUage aud Post Achhoti, Tah. Kumd, Distt. Dhamtari(GG) State ofM.P.now Chhattisgarh, through CoUector, Raipur Tati. & Distt. Raipur(CG)' BaJaram Chaudrakar, S/o. Makhanlal Chandra, aged about 45 years, R/o. Vivekaaand Vidhya Peeth, Narayanpur, Tah. & Distt. Narayanpur (CG) (Defendant No.7) 7. ^- \. Smt Kuii.ti Chaadrakar, W/o. Shri. Ramakant Chaadrakar, aged about 50 years Occupation Agriciilturist, R/o. ViUage Dahdaha, Tali. Kurud, Distt. Dhamtari (CG) At present r/o. Near Vidharbha Law CoUege, Segaon Naka, V.M.V.Road, Amaiavati, Distt. Amaravati (Maharastra) WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INBIA SIiri R.S.Patel, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy. G.A. for fhe State. OSAL ORDBR (04.0S..2009) '* The petitioner is aggrieved by fhe order impugned dated 21.4.2009, passed by First Civil Judge Class I, Dham.tari m. CivU Suit No. 14-A/95 whereby fhe appUcation as filed by fh.e plamtiff under order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Aniiexure P/4) has been allowed. "N. i"s. _^3S5inei9n. .-yy-s'~ ...._.^"''^•i^ ^".f"~v», ^*k i' "i y .-^ (s ^ Coutention of fhe counsel for the petitioner is that by aUowiug the application for amendmeut, Tn fact, the veiy nature of the suit is chaagiag and inost iniportaatly the proviso to Order 6 Rule 17 offh.e Code of Civil Procedure is being coinpletely ignored by the Court below. I faave heard counsel for tihie pardes. Admittedly, evidence ofthe plaintiff is yet to be started aad the case is at fhe prelimiuaiy stage. Leamed court below has exercised its jurisdiction while passiag the order impugned. I fiad no iuBrmity in the same. There is no error apparenton ffae fa.ce ofrecord to interfere wifh the reasoned order passed by the Court below. The petition has no substance aad is accordiagly dismis^ed. The petitioner would be entitled to file consequeutial am.endiaeut, ifso advised. Leamed coim.sd for the petitioner has confiaed his argumentonly in respect ofthe application Annexure P/4. Learued counsel for fhe petitiouer furfher subinits that he m.ay be graated liberty to file separate writ petitions for rest offhe reliefs'. The Uberty is graated as prayed for. ,-/ : ' Sd/- . A^ pritinker Diwakar Judge -<