(1) SA. 530.2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 530 OF 2004 Arun Yedba Vhatkar .. Appellant VERSUS Shantabai Arun Vhatkar .. Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 17387 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 530 OF 2004 Sow. Shantabai Arun Vhatkar .. Applicant VS. Shri Arun Yedaba Vhatkar .. Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7630 OF 2007 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 530 OF 2004 Sow. Shantabai Arun Vhatkar .. Applicant VS. Shri Arun Yedaba Vhatkar .. Respondent AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3729 OF 2004 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 530 OF 2004 Shri Arun Yedaba Vhatkar .. Applicant VS. Sow. Shantabai Arun Vhatkar .. Respondent Mr. C.R. Deshpande, Advocate for the appellant Mr. N.C. Garud, Advocate for the respondent ... CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATED : 25TH FEBRUARY, 2010 P.C.:- 1] Parties are present before the Court alongwith their Advocates. They are identified by (2) SA. 530.2004 their Advocates. Parties have filed compromise pursis, duly signed by them and their Advocates. 2] The Second Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the compromise terms. The undertakings given by the respondents no. 1 and 2 in compromise pursis, in paragraph no.(A),(B),(C) and (D) are accepted. The amount of Rs.2,50,000/- payable in terms of prayer (G) of the compromise pursis, to each of the respondents is being paid before the Court through demand drafts. Separate receipts are issued to that effect. . In view of the compromise, the Hindu Marriage Petition no. 179 of 1996 (Original Hindu Marriage Petition no. 20 of 1993 of Osmanabad Court) stands decreed as prayed for. Judgment in Regular Civil Appeal no. 355 of 2002 dated 1.10.2003 stands set aside. Compromise pursis is marked "X" for identification. 3] Consequently, Civil Application (St.) no. 17387 of 2009, Civil Application no. 7630 of 2007 and Civil Application no. 3729 of 2004, do not survive and the same stand disposed of. Sd/- (A.V. NIRGUDE, J.) arp