IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated 17.2.2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR Writ Petition No.38635 of 2006 C.Sivasubbu ... Applicant -Vs.- 1.Director General of Police, Chennai-600 004. 2.Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents Original Application No.6375 of 1999 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench praying to quash the endorsement of the second respondent in his C.No.A1/01326/99 dated 22.2.99 and consequently direct the respondents to promote the applicant as Grade-I constable with effect from 16.4.93 and as Head constable with effect from 8.1.98 from the date of promotion of his immediate juniors with all consequential monetary and service benefits. Since the Tamilnadu Appellate Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was received by transfer and numbered as Writ Petition. For petitioner : Mr.S.Ravi For respondents : Mr.S.Sivashanmugam, Government Advocate O R D E R Original Application No.6375 of 1999 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench praying to quash the endorsement of the second respondent in his C.No.A1/01326/99 dated 22.2.99 and consequently direct the respondents to promote the applicant as Grade-I constable with effect from 16.4.93 and as Head constable with effect from 8.1.98 from the date of promotion of his immediate juniors with all consequential monetary and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ service benefits. Since the Tamilnadu Appellate Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was received by transfer and numbered as Writ Petition. 2. Petitioner filed the Original Application in the year 1999. He seeks promotion to the post of Head Constable challenging the impugned proceedings dated 22.2.1999 passed by the Superintendent of Police. In the impugned proceedings it has been clearly stated that the promotion opportunity is denied in view of the pendency of the charges and he was given liberty to review his request after disposal of the disciplinary proceedings. 3. It is now stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in the proceedings in RC No.185338/Con.6(2)/92 dated 18.1.2002, the explanation given by the petitioner was considered and accepted and further action was dropped by the Director General of Police. 4. In such view of the matter, if the petitioner still has any grievance, he is permitted to make a representation in the light of the proceedings of the Director General of Police in his proceedings RC No.185338/Con.6(2)/92 dated 18.1.2002 referred to above and seek appropriate relief. The representation if made shall be considered and disposed off on merits and in accordance with law within a reasonable period of time. The Writ Petition is disposed off accordingly. No costs. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar ts To 1.Director General of Police, Chennai-600 004. 2.Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Tirunelveli District. +1cc to Mr.S.Shivashnamugam, Govt.Advocate Sr 10995 TRM(CO) km/5.3. W.P.No.38635 of 2006 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/