IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No 1342 of 2010 1. VINAY KUMAR S/O SHRI RAM NARAYAN YADAV, R/O VILL-ITAHRI, P.O-ITAHRI, P.S- SALKHUA, DISTT- SAHARSA-852126 Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT, OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DISTRICT TEACHER SELECTION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SAHARSA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, SAHARSA 4. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, SALKHUA-CUM-BANMA ITAHRI, P.O-ITAHRI, DISTT- SAHARSA 5. THE MUKHIYA GRAM PANCHAYAT ITAHRI, P.O-ITAHRI, DISTT- SAHARSA 6. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY GRAM PANCHAYAT ITAHRI, P.O-ITAHRI, DISTT- SAHARSA 7. THE HEADMASTER, PRIMARYS CHOOL, HATHMANDAL DIH, P.O-ITAHRI, DISTT- SAHARSA 8. ABHIMANYU KUMAR S/O SHRI UMESH YADAV, VILL- MOHAN PUR, P.O- SARBELA, DISTT- SAHARSA ----------- 2 28.06.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that challenging petitioner’s appointment as a Shiksha Mitra, respondent No 8 had moved the District Appellate Tribunal. Petitioner was not even made a party there and notwithstanding that, by ex parte interim order, the Tribunal had stopped salary of the petitioner but ultimately on petitioner’s appearing before the Tribunal, the Tribunal has dismissed the appeal of respondent No 8. Thus, the writ petition, challenging the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, has become infructuous and is disposed of as such. M.E.H./ (Navaniti Prasad Singh)