IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH AUGUST 2008 / 15TH SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 34750 of 2007(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ M.K.RAJAPPAN, AGED 49 YEARS, S/O.KUTTAN, MOOLANKUDI VEEDU, MEKKADU P.O. ANGAMALY. BY ADV. SRI.ANIL S.RAJ RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, K.S.R.T.C., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, PERUMBAVOOR. BY SC SRI. K. PRABHAKARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.34750/2007 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of August, 2008 JUDGMENT The grievance of the petitioner is against the order of the MACT, Perumbavoor in I.A.NO.1874/07 in O.P(MV). No.615/99, declining his prayer for releasing the full amount in deposit. A reading of Ext.P4 order shows that, the need projected by the petitioner to justify the prayer made for release of the amount in deposit was that, he wanted to repair his residential building. However, apart from a certificate, stated to have been given by the Member of the Grama Panchayat, the petitioner has not produced any other document to substantiate his request. Absence of sufficient document was the reason stated by the Tribunal for declining the prayer as made by the petitioner and in the aforesaid circumstances, I see no justification to upset the 2 finding. Therefore, the petitioner cannot be granted any relief in this writ petition. However, it is clarified that if the petitioner is desirous of withdrawing the amount, it will be open to the petitioner to make an appropriate application with sufficient proof, in which case the Tribunal shall consider the same, untrammeled by the findings in Ext.P4 order. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE vi. 3