IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 523 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: January 27, 2011 Yogeshwar Education Trust .. Petitioner Vs. Gurmeet Kaur and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. I.K. Mehta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. M.S. Kohli, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N. Jindal, J Assailed in this petition is the order dated 10.1.2011 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Kurukshetra, dismissing the objection petition filed in the application for restitution of the possession by the decree holder- respondent Nos.1 to 15. The case has chequered history. The decree holder remained unsuccessful to earn fruits of decree till to-day which was passed by the court on 20.10.1972. The judgment passed by the courts below remained under challenge in various courts and ultimately the Supreme Court vide its judgment dated 10.7.1995 set aside the decree passed in favour of Smt. Subi and Smt. Giano. Consequently, the sale in favour of Sewa Singh was up- held. The respondents No.1 to 6 are the legal heirs of Sewa Singh since deceased. The decree holders had filed application for restitution of possession on 5.5.1998, where upon, Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Kurukshetra, allowed the same vide order dated 28.3.2003. The petitioners appealed against the said order which was dismissed by the learned Additional District Judge, Kurukshetra on11.12.2003. Still aggrieved the petitioners- objectors again challenged the same before the High Court by way of two appeals i.e. E.S.A Nos. 276- 277 of 2004. Ultimately, both the appeals were dismissed by the Hon'ble Single Bench on 16.8.2010. Now again, when the respondents moved an application for restoration of the execution petition and issuance of warrant of possession, the petitioner again filed objection petition which was dismissed on 10.1.2011. Civil Revision No. 523 of 2011 (O&M) -2- *** Admittedly, the matter with regard to issuance of warrant of possession by way of restitution of possession has been held to be validly issued by the High Court, the respondents have again filed the similar objection petition which amounts to sheer misuse of the process and needs to be curbed. The executing court is complying with the decree dated 28.3.2003 which has become final between the parties. No grounds for interference. Dismissed. January 27, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge