IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11284 of 2007 SMT.BACHMUNI DEVI W/O Sri Baban Ram, resident of village-Manikpur, P.S. Indrapuri, District Rohtas. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Chief Secretary. 2.District Magistrate, Rohtas. 3.District Welfare Officer, Rohtas. 4.Child Development Project Officer, Dehri, Rohtas. 5.Mukhiya, Bhaisahan Gram Panchayat, Dehri Block, District Rohtas. Respondents Ist Set. 6.Ranju Devi Wife of Suchit Soni, resident of villge Manikpur, P.S. indrapuri, District Rohtas Respondent 2nd set. ----------- 2 3/12/2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. Prayer of the petitioner in this writ application reads as follows:- “(i)By issue of an appropriate writ the respondents be commanded/directed to consider the case of petitioner for appointment to the post of Anganbari Sevika since the date of accrual of the vacancy and she be paid her remuneration, entire arrears and current with 18% interest per annum thereon till the date of actual payment. (ii)By issue of an appropriate writ the appointment of respondent second set to the post of Anganbari Sevika be declared illegal and the respondents be directed to produce the appointment/selection letter and the same be quashed. (iii)By issue of an adinterim order the appointment of respondent second set to the post of Anganbari Sevika be stayed and the petitioner be allowed to discharge the function of Anganbari Sevika and she be paid her entire arrears as well as 2 current remuneration.” Counsel for the petitioner, however, at the out set would submit that for the aforementioned relief the petitioner has yet to exhaust the alternative remedy as provided by the State Government in the circular/guidelines pertaining to redressal of grievance of any anomaly in the selection/appointment on the post of Anganbari sevika. That being so, this application is permitted to be withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the Collector of the district by filing a fresh representation wherein she may raise all the issues which she would like to with regard to selection/appointment of respondent no.6, and the Collector on receipt of such representation would decide the issues raised by the petitioner by passing a speaking order within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order strictily in accordance with the circular/guidelines issued by the State Government. With the aforementioned observation/direction this application is disposed of. Abhay Kumar (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)