IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3065 of 2008 VIJAY CHANDRA PRASAD, S/o Late Bankey Bihari Lal, Dy Collector (Retd.) resident of Mohalla- New Punaichak, P.S.- Shastri Nagar, District-Patna ………… Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ………… OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 3 25.10.2010 There is no dispute that in the light of observations in the order of the Division Bench dated 15.05.2008, the concerned opposite party has considered the issue of allowing the petitioner to cross efficiency bar and has allowed the same. Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a grievance that petitioner’s claim for promotion from the period prior to his superannuation in the year, 1994 should have also been considered by the authorities. We find no such direction in the order of the Division Bench. The order, on the contrary limits the claim of the petitioner only to crossing of efficiency bar. In that view of the matter, we find no good reason to continue this contempt proceeding. It is accordingly disposed of. AKV/- (Shiva Kirti Singh,J.) ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)