IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 26TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 23981 of 2008(E) -------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ O.M. SEBANNIZA BEEVI, PRINCIPAL, TAGORE VIDYANIETAN, G.H.S.S, TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE MECHERIL RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, HOUSING BOARD BUILDINGS, SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.A.J. VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) 23981 of 2008 -------------------------------------------------------- Dated: SEPTEMBER 17, 2008 JUDGMENT In this writ petition filed challenging Ext.P4 order of transfer of the petitioner from Thaliparamba to Kasaragod, I am not impressed by the contentions raised on the merits. Thereupon, the learned counsel for the petitioner confined his request for a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P1, a representation made by her for transfer indicating the stations preferred by the petitioner. 2. When this writ petition came up for orders before this Court on 5.9.2008, this Court recorded the submission of the learned Government Pleader that irrespective of Ext.P4, the request made by the petitioner as above will be considered. It is contended that the request has not been considered so far. If that be so, the 2nd respondent shall take up, consider and pass orders on Ext.P1. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, and at any rate, within WP(C) 23981 of 2008 2 four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner also seeks a direction to the respondents to complete the disciplinary proceedings on an expeditious basis. 4. Having regard to the facts of the case, the 2nd respondent is directed to initiate and complete the proceedings, as expeditiously as possible, and at any rate, within six months of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-