AGK IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.28900 OF 1995. APPEAL (ST) NO.28900 OF 1995. APPEAL (ST) NO.28900 OF 1995. Shri Jagdish Narayansingh Raghuvanshi & Ors. ...Appellants Versus. Shantaram Waman @ Hemant Kalu Amrutkar & Anr. ...Respondents Shri Kishor Patil for the Appellants. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 26th MARCH, 2008. : 26th MARCH, 2008. : 26th MARCH, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard advocate appearing for the appellants. The appellants are the original plaintiffs in a suit for declaration and permanent injunction. The suit is based on right of premption. The courts below have rejected the case made out by the appellants as regards existence of right of premption. The trial Court after considering the oral and documentary evidence on record dismissed the suit and the decree of the trial Court has been confirmed by the appellate Court. The finding recorded based on appreciation of oral and documentary evidence on record is that there was an earlier partition and the first defendant had sold his separate share to the second defendant. 2. In view of concurrent findings of fact, no substantial question of law arises. Second Appeal is accordingly dismissed. No orders as to costs. Judge. Judge. Judge.