IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44490 of 2009 1. SHAHIDA KHATOON @ BIBI SHAHIDA W/O MD. SAMID R/O SOUTH BHAWANIPUR, P.S. PRATAPGANJ, DISTT-SUPAUL 2. MD. SAMID S/O LATE MD. NAZEER R/O SOUTH BHAWANIPUR, P.S. PRATAPGANJ, DISTT-SUPAUL-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Petitioners. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 23.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are alleged for administering poison to the deceased. According to the learned counsel, nothing was on record to show that it was a case of poisoning. Moreover, the deceased died in his house and F.I.R. was lodged at 8-15 p.m. while the incident took place at 11 a.m. Viscera is kept preserved only because of the reason that no cause could be detected. Deceased wife was residing with these petitioners for difference only. Husband was visiting his wife may be due his sweet-will or forced by the circumstances prevailing. It is stated in fardbeyan that his son (deceased) was unconscious who was taken to hospital where he died. So, time taken in lodging the F.I.R. cannot be said delayed followed by allegations do not justify petitioners’ for bail. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J. )