IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.6379 of 2011 DEEPAK URAON @ DEEWAKAR URAON son of Lalla Uraon Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR With Cr. Misc. No. 13056 of 2011 RAJENDRA PRASAD @ RAJAN @ RAJENDRA MASTER @ RAJENDRA RAM son of Sipahi Ram Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 20.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners were refused bail by order dated 04.05.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No.13916 of 2010 and analogous cases, but have renewed their prayer for bail since they are in custody since 16.12.2009 and 28.11.2008 respectively. The submission is that the petitioners are not named in the First Information Report and subsequently their names appeared in the confessional statement of the co-accused. Considering the same, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction of the Sessions Judge, I/c, West Champaran, Bettiah, in connection with Sessions Trial No.27 of 2011, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners another bailor shall be the father/brother of the petitioners. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the 2 court about any change in the address of the petitioners, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse,(iii) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (iv) that the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. In view of the criminal antecedents of the petitioners, the petitioners are directed to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Bettiah, within fifteen days of their release with a copy of this order and every two weeks thereafter for the next nine months. The conduct of the petitioners will be kept under watch in this period by the Superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the petitioners before the court concerned. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)