^ ^.^^ c p v0^2- M p /J^fl . ^ /. /(^ ^'/s^f A?iy ^/y 'w 0) W^.fCJ >. ^l ?^ J^)10 KemA^3 Naa SamN^hwem Samtti TN-ough ftte Presdent. Panchdhar [Sanyol: Efeit:Rc8Qcgh| VERSVS SpeaalSeai&hyy, Oeportment of SctecSyleTrifoe, Sch^ute Caste, Dtt^r Backwewd Cfe:^ arKA hteicM- 8®. , .Ref^r |C.G;t Z T^xriReseafchCeRtfe yiirougft tfte Cftafrman P<i. ^avi Shankcr Vlshwavktyaloy Parisar. R<^0W|C.G.l ^ the ch'OTmcsn, Rcapur | C.G.] AW 22gy ^7<^1f€CWStmi?I3NOFtOIA ^^ ^ "3 (^ »IWU|lrMM WK!lhi E: . . HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRTT PETJTION (C) No. 6193 of 2010 PETITIONER : Kendriya Maa Sambleshwari Samiti VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRITPETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB:Hon'ble ShriSatish K. AgmhotrU. Present: Shri Neelkanth Malviya, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.V. Sridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on 11 day of November, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh application, before the competent authorities. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that, in the event, an application is filed, the same will be considered and decided in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. 3. It is ordered as prayed for. 4. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforestated liberty, ifso.advised. j Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Arun