<^«9^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF GHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. {S)NO.-7^2- /^^<4 ^ ^ ^ -l^ PETITIONER ^ ^...-••^•'... ^..^••/" €^ Smt. Geeta Dewangagn W/o Late BasantLaIDewanga^n aged about 52 years R/o Village- Nahar para hi Tah- Kondagapn District- Baster (C.G.) , • <»% v>- ^ ^'<s:/" RE.SPONDENT.S <%w^^ ^"~^\ JAL VERSUS 1. StateofChhattisgarh Throiig'h- The Secretary^ Department of Forest, Mantralaya-i D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(CG)! . ^2. The Chief Conservator of Forest.Chhattisg^rfa^ Raspu.r(CG) 3. The Coiiserevator ofForest^ Baster Cirde, Baster (CG) ^ 4. The Divisional Forest Officer, Prodiictioii Forest Divisioss^ Kondagaon Dist Baster (€G) ^. 5. TIae Dep&ity Divisional Forest Officer KoBdagaois Dist Baster (CG 6 Account General, Account and, Hakdari Nidhi 06 Raipur (C.G.) PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER : . " ^ y Petitioner HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISaARHs BILASPUR Writ Petition (81 No. 752 of2010 Smt. Geeta Dewangaa Respoiideaits "Versus" State of Chhattisgarh & ofhers (Writ Petition under Articles 226 ofthe Constitution oflxxdia) SIn^e Bench : Hontble Shri Satish K. AgnUiotri, J. Ms Renu Kocher, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Shri A. V, Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for tiie respondents No, 1 to 5. Shri Raghvemira Pradhaa, Advocate for the respoiideat No. 6, ORDBR(0»all (Passed on thts 22nd day ofFeteuary, 2010) Heard, 1. With the consent ofthe parties fhe matter is heard finalty. 2, This case pertaias to non-gTaat of retiral dues/peasioa. Learaed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits fhat fhe matter may be referred to the pension committee, 3. This Court, in the matter ofW.P.No.4642/2004 (Baijaafh Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & ofhers) and ofher conaected matters, directed tihie Comxmttee to consider fhe xxiatter of retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were iavolved. The Committee was constitated by the State Govermnent, pursuant to the oider dated 19.06.2006 passed m W.P.No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs, State Goverament of Chhatdsgarh and others), aad order dated 13.3.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chliatdsgarh and others Vs. Baijnafh Mandal and another). Thus, fhis petition is squarely covered by tfae judgment and order dated 31st Januaiy, 2008, passed ia W.P.No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Maadal (supxu) as subiaitted by leamed counsel appearmg for the parties. 4, This petition is accordiagly disposed ofia fhe same terms i.e.» fbe office of the Advocate General is directed to send fhe case to fhe ^^•^•s-^ /5. -}.- Committee, within a period of 15 days J&om fhe date of receipt of a copy of fhis order as weU as a copy of the petitioa fix)m fhe petitioner, Thereafter, fhe Committee shaU issue notice to the petitioner aad officers concemed wifhia a furfher period of 15 days, The Committee shaB consider aad pass order, ia acconlaac^ witibi law, after affordiag proper opporfriinily of hearmg to fhe petitioner. The petitioner and fhe officers conceraed may additional documents, ifnecessaiy. The entibre exercise, includiag payment of retiral dues, ifaay, to the petitioner, may be campleted wifhia a period offour monfhs from fhe date of rcceipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shaU supply one complete set offhe petition to the State counsel for transferring fhe same to the Committee, ThaJcur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge