IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7242 of 2010 1. HEMANT KUMAR SINGH CT/GD 065201122 S/O SRI MURARI PRASAD SINGH R/O VILL.- PAHARPUR, P.O.- LOHCHI, P.S.- HAVELI KHARAGPUR, DISTT.- MUNGER Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS NEW DELHI 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CUM REVISIONAL AUTHORITY CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, BLOCK NO.1, CENTRAL DIRECTORATE CAMPUS, BLOCK NO.-1, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI 03 3. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CUM APPELLATE AUTHORITY BIHAR SECTOR, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, PATNA 4. DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GROUP CENTRE CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, MUZAFFARPUR (BIHAR) 5. ADDITIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF POLICE C.R.P.F. GROUP CENTRE, MUZAFFARPUR ----------- 2. 27.04.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Union of India. 2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 31st January, 2009 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force (hereinafter referred to as “C.R.P.F.”), Group Centre, Muzaffarpur, Annexure-2, whereunder his probation on the post of Constable (G.D.) has been terminated. The termination order has also been affirmed in appeal. The appellate order is dated 31st July, 2009, Annexure-11, whereafter the revision of the petitioner before the Director General of Police, C.R.P.F. has also failed and the order communicated under letter dated 27.11.2009, Annexure-13. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that earlier petitioner was allowed leave for the period between 14.12.2007 till 2.1.2008 but he could not join the place of posting soon after the leave period was over as he was hospitalized to undergo surgery over his left leg and that he informed the authorities about his hospitalization. After being declared fit on 27th March, 2008 petitioner joined the duty - 2 - and thereby remained under unauthorized absence for about 87 days. Petitioner informed the Group Centre, Muzaffarpur that on account of surgery he is unable to join the duties whereafter letter dated 8th February, 2008, Annexure-4 was received by him asking him to forward the medical prescription and certificate furnished by the doctor as he was undergoing treatment by a private doctor. It appears, petitioner did not comply the direction contained in letter dated 8th February, 2008, Annexure-4 as it is submitted that he was hospitalized and was not in a position to forward the same. In the event petitioner was hospitalized the prescription, certificate and other documents called for by the authorities could have been forwarded by his other attendants. As the petitioner has not chosen to comply the instruction of his employer to forward the documents and prescriptions which were generated while he was under treatment it is evident that plea of illness/surgery is not bona fide, I am not inclined to exercise my writ jurisdiction in his favour and the writ application is dismissed. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)