IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 98 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 700 OF 2005 The Security Guards Board for Brihan Mumbai & Thane District. ... Petitioner (Oig. Respdt-1) Versus Shri Hari Hegade & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. M.S.Topkar for the petitioner. Mr. C.U.Singh a/w Ashish Kamatrh i/b. Godfrey D’Souza for Respondent No.2. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. DATE : 16th December,2005 DATE : 16th December,2005 DATE : 16th December,2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The grievance of the petitioner is that before the Writ Court, on 25.11.2004, the Respondent No.2 (who are the Respondents here) had made a statement to that Court that since the security guards are not required by the Respondent No.2, he would discontinue the guards listed in Exhibit "A" to the Petition. The grievance is that those guards are not discontinued within one month, but they are discontinued by 31st March, 2005. 2. Since the guards listed in Exhibit "A" to the Petition have been discontinued, I do not find any point for consideration in this Petition. That was only a statement made to that Court and no ambiguity. 3. So far as the assurance given to that Court is concerned, it was only with regard to the payment of salary which has been paid. The Contempt Petition stands disposed of. --- (S.K.SHAH,J.) (S.K.SHAH,J.) (S.K.SHAH,J.)