HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.341 OF 2010 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order dated 11-12-2009 in I.A. No.2193 of 2009 in O.S. No.305 of 2007 passed by the learned III Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. 2. The impugned I.A. is filed by the petitioner seeking to send the document i.e., Original Settlement - cum - Receipt to the office of the Registrar, for impounding. The trial Court dismissed the said petition vide impugned order on the ground that since the document was already marked, objection for stamp duty cannot be accepted. 3. Heard the learned Counsel and perused the material available on record. 4. A perusal of the impugned order, which is laconic, shows that the document that is sought for impounding by the petitioner was already marked and for that reason, learned trial Judge refused to send the document in dispute for impounding. Still, the learned trial Judge did not discuss the issue in elaborate and did not give cogent reasons for not sending the document in dispute for impounding. Hence, I feel it appropriate to remand the matter to the trial Court for fresh disposal with cogent reasons. 5. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 11-12-2009 in I.A. No.2193 of 2009 in O.S. No.305 of 2007 passed by the learned III Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, is set aside and the matter is remanded to the trial Court to pass the order afresh with cogent reasons within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs. _________________ T. MEENA KUMARI, J September 09, 2010. KTL