IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-8865 of 2009 Date of decision:18.11.2009. Sujan Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. H.S.Sangha, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. B.B.S.Teji, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. D.S.Randhawa, Advocate, for Mr. Harinder Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. In this plea for quashment based upon compounding, the parties had been directed to appear before the learned CJM, Mansa to make a statement owning up the compounding. The report furnished by the learned CJM, Mansa is to the effect that the parties did appear and owned up the compounding. This fact is also conceded by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the respondent No.2 as well. In the larger interest of the society and to enable the parties to maintain cordial relations, the petition shall stand allowed and FIR No.101 dated 24.12.2008, under Sections 452, 324, 323, 148, 149, 307 IPC, P.S. Jaurkain, District Mansa (Annexure P-1) shall stand quashed on account of compounding. November 18, 2009 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE