IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-34138 of 2009 Date of Decision: 08.01.2010 Daljit Singh @ Ballu ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Anil Kumar Lamdharia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Moudgil, D.A.G., Punjab ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is entitled for the grant of regular bail as the two co-accused who were specifically named in the FIR have since been discharged and FIR against them stand quashed. It is further stated that the allegation in the FIR starts from the name of co-accused Manjit Kaur, against whom the FIR has been quashed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has been heard. After hearing, I find no ground to grant the concession of bail. The allegations against the petitioner are serious. He is the main accused who is alleged to have committed rape of the minor girl, aged 17 years. Dismissed. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 08.01.2010 JUDGE gurpreet