1 467.11-ao-- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 467 OF 2011 Mr.Radheshyam Trivedi. ... Appellant. V/s. Shri Kishanlal Maganlal Purohit and others. ... Respondents. P.B.Shah i/b. Vivek Salunke for the appellant (in AO No.467/11) P.B.Dhakephalkar, Sr.Advocate i/b. A.P.Mhatre for respondent No.1. A.R.Shaikh for respondent No.2. N.R.Bubna for respondent No.15. WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 645 OF 2011 Mira Bhayander Municipal Corporation. ... Appellant. V/s. Shri Kishanlal Maganlal Purohit and others. ... Respondents. N.R.Bubna for the appellant. P.B.Shah for respondent No.2. A.R.Shaikh for respondent No.3. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATED : 14th November 2011. 2 467.11-ao-- P.C. : The counsel for the respondent No.15- Corporation on 13th October 2011 informed this Court and, accordingly, statement has been recorded that the Development Rights Certificate No.188, which was granted in favour of the plaintiffs for an area of 2978.24 sq.mtrs and which was allotted initially, has been put to use to the extent of 385.63 sq.mtrs by one Creative Builder and the permission granted to Ravi Developers for use of that Development Rights Certificate has been refused and fresh permission has been granted thereby reducing the area of Development Rights Certificate issued earlier. The counsel appearing for the Corporation, reiterates the aforesaid statement and in view thereof, the counsel appearing for the appellant does not press this appeal. So far as appeal from order presented by the Municipal Corporation is concerned, the counsel for the Corporation also does not press the appeal. Both appeal are disposed of with direction to the trial Court to decide the pending suit as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within one year from the date of receipt of writ of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the controversy involved in the matter. In the fact and circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. 2. In view of disposal of appeals from order, pending civil application does not survive and stand disposed of accordingly. (R.M.BORDE, J.)