1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CA No.3249/2009 in FA ST. NO.4152/2009. Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court s’ Orders or directions and Court’s or Judge’s Order Registrar s Orders.. ’ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 24th JUNE, 2009 --- P.C.:- 1) Heard learned Counsel for the appellant/insurance company and the respondents. 2) There is delay of 84 days in causing to file the appeal. The delay is apparently not deliberate as the insurance company feels aggrieved by the award dated 29.8.2008 under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 in MACP No. 499/2004. It was only the official hassles, which has added to the misery for the appellant/insurance company. It’s rights, which it feels, should not be scuttled for this technical aspect and need not be foreclosed. Consequently, the delay of 84 days in causing to file the appeal is condoned. Application 2 allowed. 3) Counsel for the insurance company undertakes to furnish copies of appeal memo and annexures thereof to the counsel for respondents. 4) It is agreed that the matter can be disposed of finally at the stage of admission. In the meantime, issue fresh notice to Respondent No.2. S.O to 3rd August, 2009. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/bdv/ca3249.09