Petitione. ‘ P K Kawachx Son of Shn Rasa ‘ am kaw aste Go > _ Versus Respondents 1 Govt of Chhamsgarh Throu ‘ ’ ' vCobecior Kankar Distri : i i g ! SE Han we Mr uuatrce Satish Aginhotn, s Pumlma gh Advocate tV e p ’ na Jaw ane! lawyerfor the respcndeqtsIState as$edby_ Satssh K.‘ Agnihomg VJ; r- :7, fwhtwner wh e working as Assmta'rt Teacher at Midle ushoo! a ka*&a Bock & Tabs“ — Bkanuma‘apur D‘stnct- Kanker was *ransfer:ed t0 HI h chm)! Amcd: B.oc & Tans” Amagarh m the same terns and cand'tte'xs wde .mpugned crdei dated “92001 . e adya Pradesh Admmktratave nbmall at Raipur vsde mten I Order dated 9 10 ”001 direc‘ed to maintain atatus q L isosmu of i .e pe.;tto..er a.’ ‘wa I prk ‘am he mtenn' orde. the petition us ac penad cf tranafer is 0t 9 o 9h u'r R a [C nd ‘ ‘ ' M g ct m r 9 H "I ’p’ e f V ' . Th Mh m L j ua ng 7 z t r orde’ owever the respo‘xde are at hberty to pass appropriat H e orde s keeping m wew the pubhc intereat andiadmtmstrat've emgency. Itheut Insisting on comphance cf the Impuga§d transfer orde . {r rs we!’ sewed p mcrpie 0f law that transfer a an incident ic ad Irt is fer the employer to decide aegto where a particula effcer/ewprcyee be eosted keepmg m vrew public Interest ae wen a mt .stratwe exrgercy Thra Court has hmrted urradrctron to interre j fe the transfer matter and this Court can rnterfere onl m the case o y f i oved matetide ran-competence of autharrty passmg the transfer r <7 e and *ransfer order not berrg tn eonformrty with tt‘e rule; anf r gutatror‘s . t Viw o t , is s se f. e f he above th petition stand dispod o No order as to atish K. Sd/e Agnihotn . . ‘ Judge « EE: ”MW M\ r of serve r s d/ S