IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS FRIDAY, THE 1ST APRIL 2011 / 11TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(Crl.).No. 144 of 2011(S) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): --------------------- SHIJU, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O.SUBRAMANYAN, KALATHIPPARAMBIL HOUSE, KAITHARAM P.O., N.PARAVUR. BY ADV. SRI.RAJIV NAMBISAN SRI.PAUL VARGHESE RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. RURAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ERNAKULAM RURAL, ALUVA-683 531. 3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, N.PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-683 512. 4. SUJITH @ KANNAN, S/O.CHANDRAN KUTTY, KOTTEDATH COLONY, KEDAMANGALAM KARA, N.PARAVUR-683 512. R1 TO R3 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.M.KAMMAPPU R4 BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH CHAKYAT SRI.K.A.MANZOOR ALI THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/04/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPCRL 144 OF 2011: PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1.TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 15.3.2011 LODGED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. K.M.JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(CRL) No.144 of 2011-S ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the Ist day of April, 2011 J U D G M E N T K.M.Joseph, J. Petitioner is the husband of the alleged detenu, Saritha. He has approached this Court alleging illegal detention of his wife by the 4th respondent. 2. We have already passed order dated 23.3.2011. Today, when the matter came up, the petitioner, the alleged detenu and the parents of the alleged detenu were present. The 4th respondent and his mother were also present. We heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the 4th respondent. 3. The alleged detenu would say that she will go and live with the petitioner. The parents of the alleged detenu are residing at South Vazhakkulam. Petitioner and the alleged detenu would say that they are prepared to go and stay with the parents of the alleged detenu at South Vazhakkulam. We interacted with the 4th respondent also. The 4th respondent would say that he will not interfere in the affairs of the petitioner and the alleged detenu. We record these submissions and close the Writ Petition (Criminal) allowing the alleged detenu to go with the petitioner. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. (M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS) JUDGE. MS