1 upa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.947 OF 2005 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.947 OF 2005 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.947 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO.938 OF 2005 Hasmukhrai & Co. ).. Plaintiff Versus M/s.Raj Tea and Co. and another ).. Defendants Mr.T.N.Daruwalla with Mr.Shailendra Bhandare and Mr.Sumeet Basu i/b.Jehangir Gulabbai & Bilimoria & Daruwalla for the Plaintiffs. Ms.Smita Mhatre for the Defendant. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 11TH JULY 2006 DATED : 11TH JULY 2006 DATED : 11TH JULY 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The Plaintiff complains of the Defendants having infringed the word mark, label mark and the copyright in the artistic work of the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff is manufacturing "SOCIETY" tea. The Defendants are using the word mark "SOYALTY". The Plaintiff Company has already been granted ad-interim reliefs in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), (c) and (d). 2. Smt.Smita Mhatre appearing for the Defendants states that she has no instructions in the matter. However, she states that she has informed the Defendants of the matter being on board pursuant to the Order dated 2 20th June 2006. 3. No one represents the Defendants. 4. Hence, ad-interim reliefs granted earlier confirmed. 5. Notice of Motion made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), (c) and (d).