IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH MAY 2011 / 4TH JYAISHTA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 389 of 2011(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.68/2011 Dated 04/01/2011 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.A.RASHEED, KARUKAPADATH HOUSE, KARA P.O., KODUNGALLOOR, THRISSUR (DT). BY ADV. DR.K.P.SATHEESAN SRI.K.K.GOPINATHAN NAIR SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM) SRI.M.R.JAYAPRASAD SRI.MATHEW SUNNY SRI.ANOOP.V.NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- MR.K.N.VASANTHAKUMAR, S/O.(FATHER'S NAME & AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) PRESENTLY WORKING AS SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, (REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER), THRISSUR-680 001. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. BASANT BALAJI. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.N. RAVINDRAN, J. ------------------------------- Contempt Case (C) No.389 of 2011 ------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of May, 2011 J U D G M E N T The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that time schedule has been settled and the permit has been issued. In such circumstances, as the respondent has complied with the direction issued by this Court, though belatedly, I find no reason to entertain the contempt case. It is accordingly closed. P.N. RAVINDRAN, JUDGE. nj.