IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-30511 of 2008 Date of decision:12.01.2009 Ashwin Aggarwal and Others .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. BikramJit Arora, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Shilesh Gupta, DAG Punjab. for respondent. Ms. Rajwinder Kaur, Advocate for respondent no. 2. Rajan Gupta, J(Oral) This petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner for quashing of FIR no. 81 dated 15.06.2005 under Sections 406, 420, 120-B of Indian Penal Code registered at Police Station 'C' Division, Amritsar and the subsequent proceedings on the basis of compromise(Annexure P-'2') as well as on the basis of affidavits (Annexure P-'3' and P-'4'). The complainant, Ashok Kumar Bhalla is present in Court, he has been identified by his counsel. An affidavit has been filed on behalf of the complainant namely Ashok Kumar Bhalla who is present in Court. In the affidavit the complainant has stated that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. An affidavit filed by the complainant is taken on record as mark-'A' another affidavit has been Crl.Misc.No.M-30511 of 2008 (2) filed on behalf of Sangeeta Rani, w/o Sh. Ashok Kumar Bhalla, who is stated to be a witness in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon the judgment delivered by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and Others vs. The State of Punjab reported as 2007(3) RCR(Crl.)1052 contends that the FIR in question be quashed on the basis of compromise. Learned State counsel on instructions from SI, Bhagwant Singh, states that in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties he has no objection if FIR in question is quashed. In view of the compromise arrived at between the parties and affidavit filed by the complainant in the court today, FIR no. 81 dated 15.06.2005 under Sections 406, 420, 120-B of Indian Penal Code registered at Police Station 'C' Division, Amritsar is hereby quashed. All consequential proceedings automatically stand quashed. [RAJAN GUPTA] JUDGE 12th January, 2009 Skaushik