1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Seventh day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr. Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15866 of 2011 SELLAMMAL ... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE : REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE SETHUBAVACHATRAM POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT, CRIME NO.198/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S. DEENADHAYALAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Addl. Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is the sole accused and he was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 23.11.2011 for the alleged commission of offences under Sections 8(c) r/w. 20(b)(ii)(B) of NDPS Act in Crime No.198 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail. 2. Heard Mr.S.Deenadhayalan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner is an innocent person and she has not committed any offence. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for bail. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the petitioner was found in possession of 1.100 kgs of ganja which is below commercial quantity. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioner has no previous case and if for any reason, the petitioner is entitled for bail, stringent condition may be imposed. 5. Considering the submission made on both sides, I could see that the petitioner has no previous case and the petitioner was found in possession of 1.100 kgs of ganja, which is below commercial quantity and there is no bad antecedent against the petitioner and she is an aged lady, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail on the following conditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pattukottai and on further condition that the petitioner should appear before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. sd/- 07/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PATTUKOTTAI. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THANJAVUR AT KUMBAKONAM. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SETHUBAVACHATRAM POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT. 4. THE OFFICER IN-CHARGE, SUB-JAIL, PATTUKOTTAI. 5. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S.S. DEENADHAYALAN Advocate SR.No.42704 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15866 of 2011 Date :07/12/2011 RJ/7.12.11 (IT) 2p/7c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/