IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.470 of 2008 ASHOK KUMAR S/O CHANDRADEO SAH --- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. RAJ NARAYAN SINGH SON OF LATE RAM KHELAWAN SINGH -- OPP. PARTIES. For the Petitioner : Mr. Nirmal Kr. Sinha no.3, Advocate. For the Electricity Board : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ----------- 05. 07.10.2010 This Court is at loss to appreciate the grievance of the petitioner. He lodged an F.I.R. which was investigated whereafter the final report was submitted wherein the accusations were found false and a recommendation appears to have been made for proceeding against him under Sections 182 and 211 of the Penal Code. Since there was already a protest petition pending at the instance of the petitioner, learned Court below under the impugned order dated 04.07.2007 has accepted the final report and proceeded with the protest petition treating it to be a complaint. In my view, the Court had adopted a procedure which is sanctified by law. Petitioner has absolutely no occasion to raise any grievance against the aforesaid order. The application seems to be frivolous. It is, accordingly, dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)