IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE: G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO. 15996 of 2004 Between: 1 S.V.S. Prakash Rao, S/o Venkat Rao, 2 P.S. Ratnam, S/o Late Garataiah, … Petitioners AND 1 Director General of Police, Saifabad, Hyderabad 2 Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District, Ongole 3 Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ongole, Prakasam District 4 Sri Chakrapani, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ongole, Prakasam District 5 Sri B. Shankar Rao, S/o Prasada Rao, R/o Gandhi Road, Ongole, Prakasam District. 6 Police Station, Rural, Ongole, Prakasam District, rep.by its Circle Inspector of Police .....Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the Respondents 1 and 2 in not taking any steps to seek to inquire into the allegations that are made against the Respondents 3 and 4 on the basis of the complaints made by the petitioners herein and the illegal activity of the Respondents 3 and 4 as illegal and void after declaring that the police have no power or authority to interfere with the civil disputes between the lessors and lessees in respect of the leased land to an extent of Ac.17.97 cents in Sy.No.55/6B of R.L. Puram Village in Cheemakurthi Mandal of Prakasam District pending civil litigation before the civil courts and contrary to the directions issued by this Hon'ble Court confirming the orders of the lower appellate court viz. the court of First Additional District Judge, Ongole in C.M.A. 21/2004, dated 18-06-2004 as illegal and void. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support and the order of this Court dt: 15-9-2004, 28-9-2004 and 13-10-2004 and made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. M. Sudhir Kumar, Advocate for the Petitioners and the G.P. for Home on behalf of the Respondents the Court made the following: ORDER “At the request of the learned Government Pleader, Post after two weeks for counter. Interim order granted earlier shall continue till then.” ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1. The Director General of Police, Saifabad, Hyderabad 2. The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District, Ongole 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ongole, Prakasam District 4. Sri Chakrapani, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ongole, Prakasam District 5. Sri B. Shankar Rao, S/o Prasada Rao, R/o Gandhi Road, Ongole, Prakasam District. 6. The Inspector of Police, Police Station, Rural, Ongole, Prakasam District 7. Two CCS to the G.P. for Home High Court of A.P. Hyderabad (OUT) 8. One spare copy. KK HIGH COURT RGJ DT. 26-10-2004 NOTE: POST AFTER TWOWEEKS FOR COUNTER P ORDER W.P.NO.15996 OF 2004 EXTENDING THE INTERIM ORDER Drafted by: KK Drafted on: 27-10-2004 HIGH COURT RGJ DT. 26-10-2004 NOTE: POST AFTER TWO WEEKS FOR COUNTER ORDER W.P.NO.15996 OF 2004 EXTENDING THE INTERIM ORDER