~;^ C ^ (B^ !—- IN THEHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE. CNilATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^ PETITIONER W. P{Sj 33 OF 2( f}€: ^^"^ ^s^ •• ,*' Ranbir Karmakar, S/o Devendra Asstt. Teacher, ^4^ ^ Asstt. Teacher, ^'SA'°* Q^^.O^ Agedabout48 ^O \^ ^ Govt. Middle School Mana Camp ^y ^ '^v R/o - Mana camp ^ Distt-Raipur(C.G.) ^^' ^y <^y RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. GovtofChhattisgarh Through Secretary School Education Department, Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhavan Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director, Public Instructions Deptt. Directorate, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Distt. Education Officer, Distt.-Raipur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF iidiaFORISSUANCEOFSUITABLE WRIT,WRITS, DIRECTION ETC. HI6H COURT OF CHHATTISeARH AT BILASPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE Mft. SATISH K. A6NIHOTRI. J. Petitioner WRFT PETTTION (S.) No.88 OF 2007 : Shrimati Aarti Oas versus Respondents ^ovt. of Chhatt-isgarh and others Petitioner WRFT PETTTION fS.) No.89 OF 2007 : Satya Praka^i Pandey versus Regaondents Sovt, of Chhattisgarh and others Petitioner WRTT PETmON CS.) No.90 OF 2007 Shrimati 6ouri Oas versus Re^ondents 6ovt»of Chhatt-isgarh and others WRTT PETTTION (S.) No.9l OF 2007 Petitioner : Haren Chandra Bhakta versus Respondents ^ovt. of Chhatt-isgarh and others WRFT pErmoN (s.) N0.92 OF 2007 Petitioner : Jagdi^i Chandra Majumdar versus Re^ondents 6ovt. of Chhatt-isgarh and others WRTT PETTTION (S.) No.93 OF 2007 Petitioner : ftanbir Karmakar verajs Respondents 6avt. of Chhattisgarh and others ^?'^ / WRTT PETTriON (S.) No.94 OF 2007 Petitioner : Kumari Shefali Majumcbr versus Responctents 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh and others Wftrr PETITION (S.) No.95 OF 2007 Petjtioner ; Nirmal Chandra Mallik versus Respondents 6ovt. of Chhatl-isgarh and others Petjtioner WRFT PETTTION (S.) No.96 OF 2007 Norayan Chandra Biswas versus ftespondents 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh wtd others And WRFT PETTTION (S.) No. 102 OF 2007 Petitioner : Anand Kumar Saroswat versus Reaiondents ^ovt of Chhatt-jsgarh and others Present : Mr. A.H. Siddiqui, counsel for the petitk»r»r(s). Ms. Sunita Jam. Panel Lawyer for the State/re^pondents. ORDER (Passed on this 16th da/ of January, 2007) Leanwd counsel appearing for the petitioners as twll as for the State/respondents jointly aibmit that the facts ouid question of law involved in the present writ petitions are squarely covered by -rtie decision of this Court in the case of yashwant Kumw Sharadwaj vs. Mwrie^wl Cwporatfon, Owy and onothe^. 2. For the aforementioned reasons. these writ petitions are disfwsed of in terms of -t+ie decision of this Court in -ttie mat^er of Ya^iwtswit Kumar ffiaradwaj (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.T.I. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circubrs dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further whe1+ier they have been paid two advcuice increments or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on the record of the connected writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge i 2006CEI)MPJR-C<&96 Subhosh 9