1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR J U D G M E N T STATE OF RAJASTHAN VS SHYAM SUNDER AND ANOTHER (DB SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 19/07.) DATE OF JUDGMENT : NOVEMBER 19, 2010. PRESENT HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. S.N. Kumawat, Addl. Advocate General for the State- appellant. Mr. R.C. Joshi for the respondents. BY THE COURT : There is delay of 8 days in filing of appeal. For the reasons stated in the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, the delay is condoned. Heard on admission. This intra court appeal has been filed assailing the legality of the order dated 30.11.2005 passed by the Single Bench of this court directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for the purpose of regularisation he having been allowed to work for a period of more than 15 years. His services were not regularised even after the opinion sent in his favour by 2 two Advocate Generals. Failing to obtain the redressal at the hands of the respondent No.1, writ petition was preferred. The Single Bench considering the fact that legal opinion has been given by the two Advocate General so as to regularise the services, his services were satisfactory and he was performing the duties direction has been issued to consider the case of the petitioner for regularisation. We have heard learned counsel for the parties at length. We find that the direction issued by the Single Bench to consider the case for regularisation is appropriate in the facts and circumstances of the instant case as services have been rendered by the concerned employee for more than 15 years. His case was ripe for consideration for the purpose of regularisation. The apex Court in the case of State of Karnataka and Others Vs. Umadevi and Others (2006) 4 SCC 1 has laid down that as one time measure cases of such employees should have been considered for the purpose of regularisation. It is not the case set up that appointment was illegal or unauthorised which could not be considered for the purpose of regularisation. In the circumstances we are 3 not inclined to make interference in the order passed by the Single Bench. Let the order be complied with now within a period of three months. Resultantly, the intra court appeal is hereby dismissed with the aforesaid direction. (AJAY RASTOGI ) J. ( ARUN MISHRA ) Actg.CJ. mrg.