H!GH^OURTOFCHHATnSG^ H,BILASPUR WTit Petition (Sl No. 7616 of 2007 PETITIOMBR Ku. Nalini Diwan D/o Shri Dwarika Prasad Ditvaa, Age about 44 years, Lecturer; Govt. H.S. School, Thakhatpm- Distt. - Bilaspur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS 3 Vcrsus State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary, Education & Tribal Dcpartment D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer nistt. Bilaspiir(C.G.) WmTPETSTlIpN UNDER ARTICLE 326 OF THE COBSTITUTION OFIHDIA ABpearance: Shri Soiiikant Venna, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Pradeep Singh, Panel I^awyer for the State on advance copy. ORAL ORDER (20.12.2007) SUNIL KUMAR 8INHA, J Heanl. on adniission. Leamed counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has passed D.Ed. examjnation on her own expenses, therefore, she is entifled to receive two advance increments according to circiilars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999. He also submits that in many identical niatters, the petitions havc been allowed in tercus of fhe otder passed in the case of yoBshuiinnt Kumar Bharattsut^ Vs. SSunleifMd Corpofwtlon, Du.ra emjd cmother fS006 fS) aaPJS-CG 96). Hesubmits that the case ofthe petitioaer is squarely covered by the said judgnient. This fegal position is not dispufcd by the learncrl counsel for t.he. State. However, he subinits that the orrler may be passed in f-enns of fhe said judgment, but it shall be siibject to verification regariing petitioner's such qiialification. Accordingly, this Writ petition is altowed in terms of the order passcd in case of Yashwant Kunwr Bh.a.radwaj Vs. Muniapal \ CoTporadbn, Ourg and anoiher (Svpra) siihject to verification of the 1 - 2. WP(S) No. 7616/2007 facts as to whether the petitioner had acquined D.Ed. Examination Certificate on her own expenses as pcr circulars dated 24. 12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further whethcr she has bcen paid two advance inLcrennenits or not. The petition stands finally disposed of. No orier as to cost.s. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Smha Judge •-"l-'<fl.wl \\ -u-/