$}v§aié;»ihi.£ Q’N‘i‘i F L”§‘a3T§ EM‘M?R L, \ ‘ , U ‘iQ‘ilry/ Q\ In the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur WP (C) — / 2010 Petitioner /Ajay Singh 20 Yrs. S/o Late Satwant Singh Gill, Shop # 52, Hira Arcade Complx., New Bus Stand Pandri, Raipur Versus Respondents 1. State Transport Authority, CG — Raipur /, 2. Transport Commissioner, CG - Raipur Petition Under Art. 226 z 227 of the Constitution of India ,rs ‘ Q q/ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH 2 BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NO.31 11 OF 2010 PETITIONER Ajay Singh Versus RESPONDENTS State Transport Authority, C.G., Raipur & Another (Writ Petition under Articie 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Singie Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :— Shri Anumesh Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondents ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 15‘ day ofJuly, 2010) 1. The grievance of the petitioner is that on 13.08.2009 (Annexure P—1), the petitioner moved an application before the respondents for grant of permanent permit on the route Rajnandgaon to Nagpur. However, tiil date the same has not been decided by the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition may be disposed of.with a direction to the respondents to decide the said application expeditiously. 3. Learned counsel for the State submits that application of the ‘ petitioner shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law and on its own merits, within a reasonable time from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. In view of fOregoing, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the application dated 13.08.2009 (Annexure P/1) filed by the petitioner within a reasonable time from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid direction/ observation, this petition stands finally disposed of. i Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ashok