IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.10386 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: JULY 16, 2009 Suhag Chand .....PETITIONER Versus Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam, Panchkula and others ....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL --- Present: Mr.S.K. Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. .. SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) The petitioner was working as Junior Engineer in Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and retired from service on 31.1.2006. Counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer only to the extent that the legal notice dated 29.11.2008 (Annexure P9) given by the petitioner be directed to be considered and decided by respondent No.3. In the said legal notice, a prayer has been made that the respondents are not paying the complete pension to the petitioner for which he is entitled to. In view of the aforesaid stand taken by the counsel for the petitioner, without issuing notice to the other side as it will unnecessary delay the proceedings, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider and decide the said legal notice (Annexure P9) in accordance with law, preferably within a period of three months. July 16, 2009 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE