IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.39127 of 2009 1. SHARMA YADAV @ UMESH YADAV & 2. Vinod Yadav, Both sons of Vijay Yadav Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr. Misc. No.39361 of 2009 RAJ KISHORE SINGH, son of late Khedan Singh Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 11.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under section 22 of the NDPS Act. Taking into consideration the fact that recovery of Ganja is less than commercial quantity, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the District & Sessions Judge, Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with Bagaha P.S. case no.322 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be released on bail, (iii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, and (iv) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)