1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.07.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.P.S.JANARTHANA RAJA and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH Writ Petition(MD)No.7534 of 2011 M.Bhaskar .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, rep.by its Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Fort St.George, Chennai. 2.The Special Commissioner for Land Administration, Chepauk, Chennai-5. 3.The District Collector, Trichirappalli District, Trichirappalli. 4.The Thasildhar, Manaparai Taluk, Manaparai, Trichy District. 5.The Sub-Registrar, Sub-Registrar Office, Thuvarankurichy, Manaparai Taluk, Trichy District. .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to consider the representation dated 06.06.2011 and consequently to remove the encroachment in S.F.Nos.266, 375 and 379 situated at Thuvarankurichy Village, Manapparai Taluk, Trichy District. For Petitioner : Mr.E.Murugesan For Respondents : Mr.K.Mahendran, Special Govt.Pleader O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.) The petitioner has filed this writ petition to direct the respondents to consider the representation dated 06.06.2011 and consequently to remove the encroachments in the tanks in S.F.Nos.266, 375 and 379 situated at Thuvarankurichy Village, Manapparai Taluk, Trichy District. 2.It is the grievance of the petitioner that encroachments have been made on the tanks in S.F.Nos.266, 375 and 379 situated at Thuvarankurichy Village, Manapparai Taluk, Trichy District, by different encroachers, and in spite of his representation dated 06.06.2011 given to the respondents, the respondents have not taken any action for removing the encroachments. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3.Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that a representation was given by the petitioner on 06.06.2011 requesting the respondents to remove the encroachments and in spite of the same, no action has been taken. Hence, the petitioner has come forward with the present writ petition. 4.Mr.K.Mahendran, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. 5.On a perusal of the representation dated 06.06.2011 of the petitioner, it is seen that the petitioner has given the representation to the first respondent, marking copies to the respondents 2 to 5. Since the petitioner has not given the representation to the respondents 2 to 5, the petitioner is permitted to give a separate representation to the respondents 2 to 5 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. As and when such representation is made, the third and fourth respondents are directed to dispose of the same, within a period of eight weeks thereafter. 6.With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 7.It is made clear that if the respondents 3 and 4 are of the view that the encroachers are to be evicted, then they shall not be evicted except by following the due process of law. SD ASST REGISTRAR ( AE ) /TRUE COPY/ SUB ASST REGISTRAR KM To 1.The Secretary to the Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Revenue Department, Fort St.George, Chennai. 2.The Special Commissioner for Land Administration, Chepauk, Chennai-5. 3.The District Collector, Trichirappalli District, Trichirappalli. 4.The Thasildhar, Manaparai Taluk, Manaparai, Trichy District. 5.The Sub-Registrar, Sub-Registrar Office, Thuvarankurichy, Manaparai Taluk, Trichy District. 1CC TO MR. E. MURUGESAN, ADVOCATE,S R: 21955: 1CC TO THE SPL. GOVTPLEDER SR: 22180: DM:2011:JULY:19:: W.P.(MD)No.7534 of 2011 07.07.2011 2P:8C:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/