WA 380/2003 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MADAN B. LOKUR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY The appellant is aggrieved by an order dated 9.6.2003 passed by the learned Sing le Judge in Civil Rule 4812/1997. The appellant was appointed on a temporary/stopgap basis vide order dated 3.6.19 94 as a Blacksmith (F & H.T.). The appointment order clearly mentions that the t emporary appointment will continue till a regular appointment is made. Subsequently, the respondent made a regular appointment and as a result thereof, the services of the appellant were dispensed with. The learned Single Judge took the view that the appointment of the appellant was not in accordance with the Rules then in existence that is Rule 6(2) of the Ass am Craftsmen Training Service Rules, 1996. Consequently, the appellant cannot ha ve any right to continue in the post for which regular selection was made. We find no merit in this Appeal. Hence dismissed.