IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10258 of 2009 LAKSHMAN PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02. 21.08.2009 There is already a categorical order passed against the petitioner way back in the year 2001 to deposit the deficit stamps which is evident from annexuare-1 as well as annexure-1/1. Petitioner has approached the High Court stating that since he has not been told as to under what head such money is to be deposited, even thought he is willing to oblige the respondents by complying with the order, he is handicapped. In the opinion of this Court, it is only to cover up the direction issued in the year 2001. No direction is required to be issued. It is for the petitioner to find out and meet the obligation. The writ application is dismissed. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)