IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 9250 of 2009 Between: D. Bhola Ram Singh S/o. Late Abeer Chand @ Prakash R/o. Shop No.4-1-987, Abids Road, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Central Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd. rep. by its Divisional Engineer, Operation / City-I, Mint Compound, APCPDCL, Hyderabad. 2 Assistant Divisional Engineer Operation / Hyderaguda Sub Division, APCPDCL, Near Appolo Hospital Hyderaguda, Hyderabad. 3 Nadia Sultana W/o. Syed Taha Abdul Rahman R/o. 11-6-870, Opp. Pearl Regency Hotel, Lakdikapul, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.THAKUR SINGH Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2: O.MANOHAR REDDY (SC FOR APTRANSCO) Counsel for Respondent No.3: ----- The Court made the following: ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties. The petitioner filed this Writ Petition apprehending disconnection of power supply to Service Connection, bearing No.E2000714 of his premises bearing No.4-1-987, by respondent Nos.1 and 2 at the instance of respondent No.3. At the hearing, Sri S.V.Ramana, learned Counsel representing Sri O.Manohar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2, submitted that this Writ Petition is filed only on apprehension and that respondent Nos.1 and 2 are not proposing to disconnect power supply to the petitioner’s service connection pertaining to shop No.4-1-987. Having regard to this submission of the learned Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, W.P.M.P.No.12110 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 26th June, 2009 lur