1 W.P.No.1934.99 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1934 OF 1999 Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation ... Petitioner v/s Shri Raghunath Shripati Kumbhar (since deceased, through legal heirs) ... Respondents Mr.G.A.Karmalkar i/by Mr.G.S.Hegde for the petitioner. Mr.Rahul Kulkarni for respondents CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 29TH OCTOBER, 2010 P.C.: 1. The petition has been filed against the order of the Labour Court allowing the complaint and the order of the Industrial Court in Revision Application (ULP) No.286 of 1997. It appears that the respondent has expired during the pendency of the petition. His legal heirs have been brought on record, and are present in Court. 2. In these circumstances, the parties have settled the 2 W.P.No.1934.99 dispute by filing consent terms in this Court. The consent terms are signed by the respective advocates, in which the petitioner Corporation has agreed to treat the deceased employee to be in continuous service till the date of his death for the purposes of payment of gratuity and provident fund, The said consent terms are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. The respondents i.e. the legal heirs of the workman have agreed that they will not claim back wages for the period from the date of dismissal till the date of death. 3. Writ petition stands disposed of. 3 W.P.No.1934.99