1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5019 OF 1998 Chintaman Bhila Patil .... PETITIONER VERSUS The Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon & Oths. .... RESPONDENTS Mr. A.W.Talhar , Advocate for petitioner. Mrs. R.K.Ladda, Assistant Govt. Pleader for State. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5020 OF 1998 Sursing Baburao Patil .... PETITIONER VERSUS The Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon & Oths. .... RESPONDENTS Mr. A.W.Talhar , Advocate for petitioner. Mr. K.B.Choudhari, Additional Govt. Pleader for State. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5021 OF 1998 Vandana Gopal Patil .... PETITIONER VERSUS 2 The Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon & Oths. .... RESPONDENTS Mr. A.W.Talhar , Advocate for petitioner. Mr. K.G.Patil, Assistant Govt. Pleader for State. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5022 OF 1998 Vithal Chintaman Patil .... PETITIONER VERSUS The Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon & Oths. .... RESPONDENTS Mr. A.W.Talhar , Advocate for petitioner. Mr. N.B.Patil, Assistant Govt. Pleader for State. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5027 OF 1998 A.Haq A. Nabi Patel .... PETITIONER VERSUS The Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon & Oths. .... RESPONDENTS Mr. A.W.Talhar , Advocate for petitioner. Mr. V.D.Rakh, Assistant Govt. Pleader for State. 3 CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE: 03/08/2010 ORAL ORDER : 1. By way of present petitions, the petitioners claim that the suspension orders which were effected without the prior approval of the Education Officer, are not sustainable in law. 2. The Full Bench of this Court in the case of Awdhesh Narayan K. Singh V/s Adarsh Vidya Mandir Trust and another reported in 2004 (1) Mh.L.J. - 676 has held that, wherein an employee is suspended without obtaining prior sanction of the Education Officer, the responsibility to pay subsistence allowance would be on the management. 3. In view of the Judgment of the Full Bench of this Court cited supra, no merit is found in the petition. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Rule is discharged. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA ] [ B.R. GAVAI ] JUDGE JUDGE knp/WP 5019.........98