IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.9101 of 2010 Date of Decision : May 18, 2010. Jagdish Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.S.K.Rattan, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is working as a P.T.I. in the Education Department, Government of Punjab. He wants a direction to the respondents to count his un-interpreted “temporary service” towards his pay fixation and annual grade increments. He is said to have sent a legal notice dated 1.3.2010 (Annexure P-3) to the respondents for the afore- stated relief but there is no response to the same. Though the petitioner has not referred to any Rule/Instructions in terms whereof the above-stated relief can be granted to him, however in stead of expressing any views on his entitlement at this stage, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent No.2 to take cognizance of the aforesaid legal notice served on behalf of C.W.P.No .9101 of 2010 2 the petitioner and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. May 18, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE