IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5077 of 2011 BIHAR MADARSA SIKSHAK SANGH RAJYA PARISHAD , Patna, through dits Secretary Karamat Hussain, son of Abdul Majeed, resident of Majeed Academy, line Chowk, P.S. and District-Kishanganj---------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Special Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna 3. The Secretary, Secondary, Primary and Adult Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Speical Director, Secondary Education Government of Bihar, Patna. 5. The Commissioner and Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 6. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 7. The District Magistrate, Kishanganj 8. The District Education Officer, Kishanganj--------------------------Respondents. ----------- 2. 23.3.2011 The matter relates to non-granting of financial aid to the 14 Balika Madarsa of the petitioner from 1.4.1999 as per report of the District Magistrate, Kishanganj,(respondent no.7) submitted to the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, (respondent no.6). Petitioner has chosen to assail the aforesaid report of respondent no.7. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that a representation dated 15.7.2010 has been made before the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna, to consider the report and to take appropriate action in accordance with the different Government notifications. Thereafter, in pursuance of the letter no.463 dated 8.7.2006 of the Commissioner and Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, another report dated 12.1.2011 was submitted by respondent no.7 to 2 respondent no.6 for taking appropriate action with regard to six Balika Madarsa and petitioner has chosen to file a representation dated 4.2.2011 which, according to him, remains unanswered by the concerned official respondent till today. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, it would suffice if a direction is given to respondent no.6 to dispose of the above representation as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. This Court orders accordingly. With the above observation/direction this writ petition is disposed of. Sudip ( T. Meena Kumari, J.)