IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. W.P. (S) No....LI.S.6l2r:.....2011 PETITIONER -s ^^^ -^?^ ^^::....^ ^^.^"" Subash Chandra Kar, S/o Shri Karuna Kar, Aged 57 Years, H.M., Pramiry School, Bitangipali Basna, District Mahasamund (C.G) VERSUS ^ ^^-. RESPONDENTS (1) The State Govt. of Chhattishgarh, Through - The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) (2) District Education Officer, Mahasamund District Mahasamund ( C.G.) \^ t)»1 ^eoNsnrunoN OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OR T PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE MANDAMUS/DIRECTION OF QTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT. ^^^, Q^ HmH,0&URT^Of,CHHATriSGARH_AT,BILABP'(JR 8B : HON^BLB MR. JUSTICB PRITXHKBR DIWAHER .. Su'bash Chandm Kar •versus RESPONDE^MTS Stat^eofC.G. & O&ers SIiri Soinkant Verma, counsel &r the Fetttioner, Shri Praveen Das, Dy. G.A. for tlie State, WRIT PETITION UNDERARTXCLB 226 OP TKB COMSTITUTIGK' OF mmA .ORDBR (26.08.20111 W'itli th.e consent of fhe paities, the m-atter is lieard &ia[!y, The petitioiier wa.s mitiaMy a.ppom.ted as Depu.ty Teacher on a fiX,ed pay ofRs. 1.00, After com.plctioa ofhis probatioii period, he waa granted regular pay sca3.e ofRs. 169-300. LeaiT^.ed coynsel for 'fee petitioiier submits that the el^ove issue ta.as been considered by flie M»P. State Adiaiiiistrative. Tribui3.al, Jab&Jpur m O.A. No. 2745/89 .between Madhuka.nt Yadii and 56 others Vs, State of M.P, and ^fiers, w.'hercm. it we.s held f.b.at tlie siiailariy sitaated teachers arc entitled to reguler pay' scale witli effect {rojii the date-ofi&itial appoizitm.ent Tlie matter was taken iip to fhe HoB'bl.e Supreme Couit. The a|;)peal was dismissed by the HoaWe Supreme Court uptiolding the decision of the Tribuiial. to tlie elTect thcit. tlie Tea.c'b.ers/AssistaD.tTeache.rs are eiititled to regul.ar pay scale from •th.e d.ate ofiuitial appoio.tm.erit, It is farfher subn'iitted th.at tli.is Court. while considering the sanie issue in W..R fS; .IVo. 4725/2006 'betweenArnar Sai Rmn & Others VB. State,of ChhaUisgarh arid Others by order' dated 01.09.06 allowed tlie petitioriere to m.ake a represen.tation withm a period often days, raismg aU. tlie grievaiices. . Accordiiigly th.e petitioner is grasated liberty to m.ake a representatlon raisiiig ali. his gri^vaoces m. the li.gh.t of fh.e aforesaid judgment aa.d. th.e circular dated. 05,01.2011 (Annexiire P^5), and ia ^il^.. ^ i^ ,JJ ^^ im^^..^ ^^^^^' ^-< tuni the concem.ed respondeit.t i,s directed to deci.de the representation, if any, m accordai^ce w~ith law, on its own merits. witlim a pe.riod.of eight. weeks from 'tlie date of receipt of fhe represente.tion subject to verii3catio.il ofthe .tacts. In view ofthe fo.rego.mg, this petition is disposed of. No orcler as to costs. . , .....---—— Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge