- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.456 OF 2002 REVISION APPLICATION NO.456 OF 2002 REVISION APPLICATION NO.456 OF 2002 Dr.Rajeev K. Joshi ...applicant vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents Mr.Shivprasad Shetty for the Applicant Ms M.H.Mhatre,A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : JULY 15,2005. : JULY 15,2005. : JULY 15,2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate for the Applicant and learned A.P.P. for State. The Applicant filed a private complaint against the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 herein and two others alleging commission of offence under Section 499, 500 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. By the impugned order the learned Magistrate directed enquiry under Section 202 so far as accused Nos.1 and 2 were concerned and dismissed the complaint as against the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 herein as there was no prima facie case. The Respondent Nos.2 and 3 who were original accused Nos.3 and 4 are practising Advocates. Perusal of the complaint shows that the allegation against the said Respondents is that they acted as per the instructions of their respective clients. On plain reading of the complaint it is apparent that no case was made out for prosecuting the said Respondent Nos.2 and 3. No fault can be found with the impugned order. Revision Application is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE