IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.7058 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:28.10.2010 Goverdhan Lal ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Ram Kumar Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 10.09.2010 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Hoshiarpur. Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that the learned Court below should not have framed the issue and have decided the application filed under Order 21 Rule 32 of the Code of Civil Procedure [for short “CPC”] as it is. I am afraid that this contention cannot be accepted because in case an application under Order 21 Rule 32 of the CPC is filed to which a reply is also filed, it is to be decided by the Court only after framing of issues and taking evidence of both the parties, if any. In view thereof, the present revision petition is totally frivolous and the same is hereby dismissed in limine. October 28, 2010 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE