vf‘“ @ 3mm Eanéh‘ BEFORETHE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (c.G.) CONTEMPI‘ PETITION NO. ( g L/2006 M THE MATTER OF WP NO. 1701 /2006( APPLICANT Smt. Saroj Bai Aadjl, Wife of Shri Manohar Lal Aadil, aged about 53 years, ‘ocaste Mehar (Schedule Casté) Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Tarenga, Block Bhatapara, Tehsil Bhatapara, I District Raipur (Chhatu'sgarh) VERSUS NON—APPLICANT P.P. Shrou‘, Director (Panchayat), Directorate, Raipur (C.G.) w: CONTEMP'I‘ PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT. XI—HC—22 WW,W1§,W Shri Sun“ Sahu, couns‘sel for ‘the petiticmer. shré Vinay Harit, Sr' Couhsei with $hri Narayan Shrivastava, counsel for the respandent. ' Respondent has aiready fiied his rep3y aiong with aff§davit and ceriified copy of order passeci by him. This Ccurt on 13.04.2WE, passed itie fciiowing operafive order. ”in view of this; order, the revieion preferred by the fifth responqient befere the seccnd respondent dcee not survive for decision- making am in that View of the matter, the second re'pondenr 35 cirreoted to remii the origina! re ord, if received from the third respondo or the fourth reeoondenf, forthwith fo fhe thirci reepondenf in order to faciiime him to hear ard disoose of the appeai of the oefriioner e peésiaousiy." Though the respond nt soon after rhe receipt or me copy of fhe order did not close the p eedings, yet. he did not pass any order contrary to the order "pas ed by this Court. From perusat of the proceedings of respondent, t is apparent that he did‘not witifuiiy disobey the order of this Court. t am of the opinion that the respondent did not commit any contempt of this Court, ther ore, the petitionisliabie to be dismissed and is accordingly dismissed. Certified copy as per es, i Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge (dieéfeh) n. r c nae-Mmpo‘l/O i6 In 200 W mam mm mmww mmafdwm WW haihtrm 13.01 .2i3it7. Cont F’et. No. 1 32 of 20W.