1 ssm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 190 OF 2009 M/s. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. ...Petitioner. Vs. Kailashnath Dubey & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.Rahul Mehta i/by Ms. Disha Karambar for the Petitioner. Mr. Pasi Balakram Gajraj for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 22ND JUNE, 2009. P.C.- 1. The Respondents have failed to pay the due amount since July, 2008 and therefore this Petition. The parties have settled the matter and accordingly executed the consent terms dated 22/06/2009 signed by Respondent No.1, Petitioner and respective advocates. The consent terms is taken on record and marked “X”. There is no dispute about the identification of the signature as well as the persons involved. The statement is well within the framework of law and the record. The Petition is accordingly disposed of in view of the consent terms. No costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)