[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVN.APPLN.NO.402 OF 2008 Shrimant Bandhu Ghadge ..Applicant Vs. Shantinath Pandurang Randive and Ors. ..Respondents ... Mr.Sandeep S.Salunkhe advocate for applicant Mr.Y.M.Nakhwa A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : DECEMBER 2, 2008 DATE : DECEMBER 2, 2008 DATE : DECEMBER 2, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 24.3.2008 whereby the Respondents-accused came to be acquitted, the applicant-original complainant has preferred the present application. By judgment and order dated 24.3.2008, the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Pandharpur acquitted the Respondents-accused in Sessions Case No.26 of 2007. 3. The prayer of the applicant is that State be [-2-] directed to file appeal against the judgment and order dated 24.3.2008 whereby the respondents-accused came to be acquitted. The learned APP has stated that the State has indeed filed Application for leave to appeal bearing No.3967 of 2008. The said application has been filed on 18.9.2008. In view of this statement, nothing further survives in this application and it is disposed of. 4. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]