W ) m/ $m£LE 3W?“ @_ WM i AT BILASPUR PETITIONER W.P.(S) Neg-$3 Of 2011 Smt. Sushmadas, W/d. late Shri Sanatan Das, aged about 61 years, R/o. Sankra, P.O. Sankra, District Raigarh (C.G.) Versus State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Rigarh, District Raigarh (C.G District Education Office, Distric Raigarh (C.G.) Block Education Offir, Baramkela, District Raigarh (C.G.) § 1‘ Acountant General of Chhattisgarh, Pandari, Railway Crossing, Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA a ) r t ce c G.E.Road, Rajpur (Chhattisgarh) Joint Director, Treasury Accounts and Pension, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) District Treasury Officer, HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETlTiON (S) NO‘ 1893 OF 2011 Petitioner Smt. Sushmadas Versus State of Chhamsgarh & Others Respondents WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnlhotrl, J.) Present :- Shri H.B.Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Shri Jitendra Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri R. Pradhan. Advocate for the respondent No.6. ORDER gORALI (Passed on this 08 day of April, 201 1) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the case, being payment of retiral benefits matter, may be referred to the pension committee to consider all the issues after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. x This Court, in the matter of W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Barjnath Manda] v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order~dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar v. State Government and others) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh & Others v. Bay’nath Manda! and another). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31$ of January, 2008 passed in WP. No. 4642/2004 Bag’nath Mandel (supra) as submitted by learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. This petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms Le. the ofhce of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the {\A @D petition from the petitioner and this order. Thereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and the omcers concerned, within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may file additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner be completed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall supply extra copy of the petition to the learned counsel appearing for the respondents for forwarding the same to the {M Committee. Sd/—' “at ashok Satish K. AgnihOtri Judge