IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.18990 of 2010 Workman Gurnam Singh Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court Ambala & another Present: Mr.Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner had sought reference of the dispute regarding his termination by alleging that he had worked continuously with the respondent-Management. From the evidence on record, it revealed that the petitioner was working as a Rickshaw-Pullar for distributing LPG cylinders. Finding of fact, as recorded by the Labour Court on the basis of material placed before it, is that the petitioner filed his claim statement by willfully and intentionally taking false and frivolous pleas, which were termed as an abuse of process of law. The partner of the Management was produced as a witness at the asking of the petitioner and on the basis of his evidence and the material placed on record, he proved that the petitioner had not worked for 240 days or more in the last 12 preceding calendar months before the date of his alleged termination on 16.5.2005. Finding further is that the petitioner could not lead any evidence to rebut the documentary evidence produced on record. It is also recorded that the petitioner even did not utter a single word in the whole of his testimony assailing the credibility of the record produced at his instance. A finding of fact recorded by the Labour Court, thus, is assailed to seek re-appreciation of the evidence, which will be beyond the scope of the writ court. There is no merit in the pleas raised. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. October 25, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE