IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38584 of 2010 AKHILESH YADAV @ AKHILESHWAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 26.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner is named by co-accused Baleshwar Yadav from whose possession counterfeit/fake notes of Rs. 50/- and Rs.100/- are recovered. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that this much of evidence may never be taken for refusal of anticipatory bail. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in Hawai Adda P.S. Case No. 127/09, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. However, at the stage of hearing the case on the point of charge, anticipatory bail so granted to this petitioner may be justified 2 by the court below considering further material collected in the case. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)