1 ndm 901 cra.450.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 450 OF 2010 Smt. Leelabai Harilal Pardeshi (since deceased through her legal heir) Vs. Anant Baburao Hubalikar (since deceased through his legal heirs) and ors. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. T.D.Deshmukh for the Applicant. Mr. Jaydeep S. Deo for Respondent Nos. 1 to 6. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 10th December, 2010. P.C. 1 The learned counsel appearing for the Applicant on instructions states that the Applicant is not pressing the revision application on merits. He states that the Applicant’s real brother is present in the Court. He, however, prays for grant of a longer time of more than two years to vacate the suit premises. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondents opposes the prayer for grant of time of two years and more and submitted that a reasonable time may be granted. 2 The suit premises is a business premises. The Applicant is not pressing the revision application on merits. The Applicant has shown willingness to give undertaking to vacate the suit premises. Considering these aspects, the decree will become final. Hence, considering the facts of the case, time to vacate is granted till 31st May 2012. 2 3 Hence, I pass the following order: i. Revision application is dismissed as withdrawn; ii. Decree for possession shall not be executed till 31st May, 2012 subject to condition of the Applicant filing usual undertaking to vacate the suit premises ; iii. The undertaking shall be filed in this Court within a period of six weeks from today; iv. If compliance is not made by filing undertaking within a stipulated time, the decree for possession will become executable forthwith; v. No order as to costs. [ A.S.OKA, J ]