IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.2021 of 1985(O&M) Date of Decision: 09.11.2011 Surinder Singh son of Gurnam Singh, resident of village Behniwal, Tehsil Mansa, District Bhatinda and others. ... Petitioners Versus The Financial Commissioner (Appeals) Punjab, Chandigarh and others. ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:None for the petitioner. Mr. Navdeep Sukhna, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Harminder Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.22. ***** 1.Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? NO 2.To be referred to the reporters or not? NO 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? NO K. KANNAN, J. (Oral) 1. At several previous hearings, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. The case was actually been dismissed for default earlier on 12.05.2004 and restored for fresh hearing. After restoration, at the previous hearing, there had been no representation on 11.07.2011 also. The case has been on Board for final hearing for the last one week and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner for hearing. 2. The writ petition is dismissed for default. NOVEMBER 09, 2011 ( K. KANNAN ) Rajan JUDGE