ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.10503 OF 2003 APPEAL (ST) NO.10503 OF 2003 APPEAL (ST) NO.10503 OF 2003 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.S.A.Ghaisas for the Appellants. Mr.Dnyaneshwar Deshmukh for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 29th April, 2008 : 29th April, 2008 : 29th April, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Pending the admission, the parties have arrived at the consent terms dated 29th April, 2008, marked "X" and taken on record. The consent terms has been signed by the power of attorney holder for all the Respondents and the Power of Attorney Holder for Appellants The Power of Attorney Holders are present in the Court. This power of Attorney are part of the consent terms. The power of Attorney is also signed by the respective advocates. There is ( 2 ) no dispute about the identification, signature of those Power of Attorney holders. 2. There is no dispute about their authority to enter into the present consent terms. The learned counsel appearing for both the parties make statement that the present consent terms is within the frame work of law and within the record. The ownership so agreed will be taken effect if it is permissible under the law. 3. In view of this, the present Second Appeal is disposed of in terms of consent terms. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]