S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.1016/2010 Chanderpal Singh and Anr. VS. State of Raj. & Anr. Dated : 27.05.2010 HON'BLE MR. MAHESH BHAGWATI,J. Mr. Vimal Singh, for the petitioners. Mr. Paresh Choudhary, PP for the State. *** By way of this Criminal Misc. Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., the petitioner has implored to set aside the impugned order dated 29th April, 2010 rendered by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deeg, District Bharatpur. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State and carefully perused the relevant material on record, it is noticed that one FIR No.49/2007 came to be registered at Police Station Deeg wherein the police, after completion of investigation, gave final report. Aggrieved with this, the complainant filed a protest petition and examined himself including the witnesses Laxmi, Bhagwati, Ramveer Singh, Vishambhar Singh, Lalvati and Viri Singh in support thereof. The Court found the only offences under Sections 147, 380, 382, 452, 427 of IPC to be facie made out. The learned trial Court, accordingly, took the cognizance of the aforesaid offences and proceeded against 14 accused persons, as named in the impugned order. -2- The learned counsel for the petitioner instead of assailing the impugned order, simply argued that the warrant of arrest issued by the learned trial Court should be converted into bailable warrant. This prayer is not based on any ground. Learned counsel has failed to convince as to why should the arrest warrant be converted into bailable warrant. Neither I find any ground to interfere with the finding of the learned trial Court with regard to taking cognizance of the aforesaid offences nor I find any reason to convert the arrest warrant into bailable warrant. The petition is totally devoid of substance, which deserves to be dismissed at the threshold and the same stands dismissed accordingly. (MAHESH BHAGWATI)J. Pcg