IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15166 of 2006 Guddu Kumar, son of Vijay Sharma, resident of village + Post Aoure, P.S. Ramgarh Chhowk, District Lakhisarai … Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Commissioner cum Secretary Human Resources Department, Patna 2. The Director Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar New Secretariat, Patna 3. The District Magistrate, Lakhisarai 4. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Lakhisarai 5. The Block Development Officer Ram Garh Chowk Lakhisarai 6. The District Superintendent of Education, Lakhisarai 7. Sri Parma Nand Singh Ex-Mukhia Aoura Panchayat Ram Garh Block, Lakhisarai village Dakra, P.S. Ramgarh Chowk 8. Sri Kumud r1, son of Mahendra Pd. Singh, resident of village Dakra, P.S. Ramgarh Chowk Lakhisarai Gram Panchayat Raj Aoure Ram Garh Chhowk Block Lakhisarai 9. Gram Panchayat through Mukhia Aoure Ram Garh Chhowk Block, P.S. Ram Garh Chhowk, District Lakhisarai … Respondents ----------- 3. 22.6.2011 This writ application involves the basic issue as with regard to either selection or continuance on the post of Shiksha Mitra. Though the post of Shiksha Mitra came to be abolished in the year 2006, the petitioner has a grievance that had he been selected/ continued on the post of Shiksha Mitra he could have been absorbed as a Panchayat Shikshak in view of the provisions made under 2006 Act laying down the norms of selection on the post of 2 Surendra/ Panchayat Shikshak/ Prakhand Shikshak. As a matter of fact for such grievance some of the similarly situated persons had moved the District Teachers Appellate Authority constituted under 2006 Act but then the concerned ‘Authority’ had taken a view its jurisdiction was confined to dealing only with the cases of Panchayat Shikshak/ Prakhand Shikshak. This aspect of the matter had accordingly received attention of the State Government which by way of clarification in its letter dated 14.5.2009 has held that even the disputes relating to the post of Shiksha Mitra could be adjudicated by the District Teachers Appellate Authority. Counsel for the petitioner in view of the aforesaid subsequent development seeks leave of this Court to withdraw his writ application in order to enable the petitioner to move before the concerned District Teachers Appellate Authority. That being so, this application is permitted to be withdrawn with the aforementioned liberty. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) 3