IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6559 of 2010 SUJIT PASWAN SON OF UMESH PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 8.3.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 368 and 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that there are documents to show that in fact the petitioner and the victim girl had married each other and even though the girl was recovered on 22.5.2009, the statement u/s.164 Cr.P.C. was recorded only on 5.8.2009 indicating that in the meanwhile there could be some pressure upon her to give an adverse statement, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 23.7.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge V, Begusarai in Sessions Trial No.1240 of 2009 arising out of Ballia P.S.case No.91 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail and (iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given - 2 - date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )