FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4774 OF 2010 [Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Co-op.Sugar Factory Ltd. Keshegaon vs The State of Maharashtra and anr.] _________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _________________________________________________________________________________ Shri R.D.Raut, advocate h/f Shri S.J.Salunke, advocate for the applicant Shri S.G.Nandedkar, A.P.P. for respondent no1. Shri K.S.Bhore, advocate for respondent no.2 absent ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : 8 th April, 2011. PER COURT :- 1 Heard Shri R.D.Raut, advocate h/f Shri S.J.Salunke, advocate for the applicant and Shri S.G.Nandedkar, A.P.P. for respondent no1. 2 This is an application preferred by the applicant for condonation of delay of 2 days caused in filing the accompanying Criminal Application seeking leave to file appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 7.9.2010, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class-II, Osmanabad, in S.C.C. No. 557 of 2004. (2) 3 For the reasons stated in the application, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily and it further appears that the delay caused in filing the accompanying application is not willful, deliberate and intentional and certainly not inordinate, and same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 4 Hence, present Criminal Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B' thereof and delay of 2 days caused in filing the accompanying application seeking leave to file appeal stands condoned and present application stands disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) dbm/crap4774.10