IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P. No.597 of 2010 Date of Decision.19.08.2011 Sh. Dharam Singh and others .....Petitioners Versus Sh. S.C. Aggarwal, ISA, Chief Secretary to Government of Punjab, Punjab Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Arvind Mittal, Addl. A.G., Punjab. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The State has filed a reply giving details of the fact that all the petitioners have been give appointment and the amounts due to them have also been paid by means of drafts. The drafts have been handed over in Court to the counsel appearing for the petitioners. The appointment letters are also annexed along with the reply by way of affidavit. 2. No further orders are necessary. The contempt petition is treated as disposed of. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 19, 2011 Pankaj*