IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36835 of 2010 SANTOSH KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03/ 09.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner is not named in the FIR but in course of investigation, it came to light that he was found using stolen mobile. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner has purchased aforesaid mobile from one Pappu Kanhar. He further points out that petitioner was put on TI Parade but the informant and one witness could not succeed to identify him. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, I direct the petitioner (Santosh Kumar Shrivastava) to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the CJM, Rohtas at Sasaram in Nokha P.S. Case no. 171 of 2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)