1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.205/2011 ( Vinayak s/o Manikrao Kale Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. VA Bagal-Patil, Adv. for Petitioner/s; Mr. PP More, APP for State. *** CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 16 th June, 2011. 1) Heard finally. Since the order of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jalna dated 28th February, 2011 in Criminal Revision No.45/2011 illustrate, stay to the investigation was till filing of reply. In clause 3 of the order, the learned Sessions Judge has observed of releasing the accused on pre-arrest bail in the event of registration of the crime. This part is objected to by the petitioner and rightly so. However, it will be informed to the Additional Sessions Judge, while causing appearance in the said Criminal Revision No.45/2011, and based on such reply, after hearing, the learned Judge will pass appropriate orders in relation to clause of pre-arrest bail concerning the respondent No.2 Sudhir s/o – Satyanarayan Shetty, (in the present petition). 2) With above clarification, the writ petition is disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/