NLTHE HON^BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONTEMPT CASE (C) N0. •2-3\ /^bl^ 2-c 1\ PETITIONER RESPONDENTS/ CONTEMNORS v^ ^.y. .^C'fC^" ~.••""^'^i.^ ....-"^v^' ^^'^ ^v. '^•" ^w- Smt. Gayatri Shrivastava W/o Shri Raj Gopal Shrivastava, aged about 54 years, R/o Aama'Kherawa Road, Manendragarh, Distt.- Korea (C.G.). VERSUS 1. Shri Nirmal Chand Jha The Chairman - Cum - Managin; Director, South Eastern Coalfields Liraited, Seepat Road, Bilaspur (C.G.). 2. Shri M.P. Dikshit The Ex Chairraan - Cum - Managin; Director, South Eastern Coalfields Liraited, Seepat Road, Bilaspur (C.G.). 3. Shri A.K.Patro The General Manager, South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Hasdev Area, P.0.- South Jhagrakhand, Tahsil- Manendragarh, Distt.-Korea (C.G.). 4<' Shri Mritunjay Mishra The Ex- General Manager, South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Hasdev Area, P.0.- South Jhagrakhand, Tahsil- Manendragarh, Distt.-Korea (C.G.), <^7 CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION - 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF THE COURTS ACT, 1971. ^ -HC—78 ^sf '<<i<ii<n'ii, t<ixll^Jl<o, fslcfl-M^ u^- (^)&_f6^ i^ .5C, 1 / ll 260 sn^i -^v (^F^^ET) sn^r w R;-ti«ti | ~^^\ sn^r ^^\^. i Lrsspt! ?^fIW?lft(t 311^1 SB L Hon'bie Shri Manindra Wiohdin Shrivastava. J. +l<ii?i''?l-1 TlTPTCTf •9fe€t ^'3iRra3n^i 27-08-2011 Shri Rishi Rahui Soni, coL<nsei forthe petitioner. Learned counsel for the Ipetitioner fairlv submits that the contempt petition arising out of order da|ed 11/3/2011 passed in W.P.No1812/'1997 has been finalty disposed off. hpe however submits that he may be granted iiberty to take recourse to such r law against order passed on 8/0|4/2010 (Annexure C/9). Considerina the submissi contemDt Detition No.101/10 fiNd eariier bv Javant Kumar Shrivastava has been disposed off vide order contempt proceedings In respec^ petitioner is therefore has to be ( The petitioner however w| available under the iaw in respej ^medy as may be availabieto him underthe bns made and takina into consideration that Idated 6/9/2010, this petition for initlating t of the same order is not maintainaDie. l ne jismissed and is accordinaiy dlsmissed. 3uld be at iiberty to take recourse to remeay ;t or' order dated 8/4/2010 (Annexure C/9). Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge