^ s/ ^-^ \€5^) /- IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) WRIT PETITION fS) N0. //^>S^L QF 2011 ^\^-;g^ \^ ^<<-:!!rA^'-"r^"/V.^* t'.'.%i^>' ,^;.^^' '^.-- ^^ RESPONDENTS ^r?-^,,^ PETITIONER : ^ Jati Ram Dhruve, S/o Preet Ram Dhruve, aged about 60 years, At Present working as Supervisor at Dhansir Community Health Centre, Bilaigarh, District Raipur (C.C.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the Secretary, Department of Health, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Collector, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ChiefMedicaland Health Officer, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) District Medical Officer, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF j? ^ // ^.^y •y ^~ INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (8) No. 4837 of2QU PETITIONER : Jati Ram Dhmve. RESPONDENTS VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. Amit WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri P.P.Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner. Sliri Amn Sao, Goveniiiient Advocate for the State. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 25th day ofAugust, 2011) 1. Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 15.07.2011 (Annexure P/l) whereby, the petitioner, working as Supervlsor at Dhansir Community Health Centre, Bilaigarh, has been transferred to Primary Health Centre- Katgi, Kasdol, on admmistrative grounds. 2. Shri Sahu, leamed counsel appearing fbr the petitioner submits that only 9 months are left for superannuation ofthe petitioner and at this stage^ transferring the petitioner from his present place ofposting is unjustified and contrary to the transfer policy ofthe State. Thus. the same may be quashed. 3. Shri Sao, leamed Govemment Advocate appearing for the State/ respondents submits that if a representation is made by the petitioner raising his grievances for quashing ofthe impugned transfer order, as stated above, within a period of five days, the same shall be considered within a period of 10 days from the date ofreceipt ofthe representation. 4. In view of the above, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to make a representation to the respondent authorities raising all his grievances within a period offive days, and thereaften the respondent authorities shall consider and decide thc same within a farther period of three weeks. It is further directed that till any decision on the representation ofthe petitioner is taken, status quo as obtains today in respect ofthe placement ofthe petitioner shall be mamtained. 5. With the aforesaid obsen/'ation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge ^