: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.486 OF 2009 Municipal Corpn.of Gr. Bombay ....Petitioner V/s. Hanmant R. Ghadge ....Respondent Mr.S.K. Talsania, Senior Counsel with Mr.D. Das i/b M/s.M.V. Kini & Co. for the Petitioner. Mr.R.V. Sankpal for the Respondent. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 1ST APRIL, 2009. P.C. : 1. I do not suggest that the matter is free from any doubt. I am however not inclined to interfere with the same for the limited reason that the Industrial Court has come to a finding of fact on the test of balance of probabilities. I am unable to conclude that the reasons furnished by the Industrial Court are perverse and that the view taken by the Industrial Court is totally unsustainable. Thus though I may have come to a different conclusion on an appreciation of evidence, interference with what is essentially findings on question of fact is not called for in the facts of the present case. 2. For instance, it is observed that one of the witnesses stated in case a bag is obstructed by some : 2 : nail or any other objects, it can be taken out and that such an incident had once occurred. The Industrial Court found that the Enquiry Officer had not considered this aspect of the matter. 3. The Industrial Court has also not taken into consideration that the Petitioner on an earlier occasion returned an amount of Rs.10,000/- belonging to a passenger found in the bus for which he was given a reward. 4. In the circumstances, the Writ Petition is dismissed.