47 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Slngte Bench : Hon'ble Shri S.R. Nayak, e.J. Writ Petition No.5917 OF 2005 PETtTIONERS RESPONDENTS PETITIONER RESPONDENTS vereus 1. 2. 3. Geetanjali Sahu, D/o Shri L.R. Sahu, Aged about 21 years, Sweta Bhakru, D/oShri Arjun Bhakru, aged about 22 years Vandna Dewangan, D/o Shri Jayant Kumar Dewangan, aged about 23 years PriyaSahu, D/oShriN.K. Satiu, agedabout 20 veai'^ Rachna Daddha, D/o Shri Vijay Daddha, aged about 20 years Vibha Arjaria, D/o Shri D. Arj'aria, Aged about 20 years All are students of Second Year (4"1 Semester), M.B.B.S. Course, Chhattisgarh Institute of Nedical Science, Bifaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (CG) State , of Chhattlsgarn, through ' the Secretary, Department of Heatth, Mantrsla'/a, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Chhattisgarn Institute or' Medlcal Scienoe through : Dean, Chhattisgarh Institute of Medioal Soienoe, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C-G') -. Guru Ghasidas University through Registrar, Guru Ghasidas Un.iversity, Koni, Bjlaspur, Distt. Biiaspur (CG) Writ Petition No.317 OF200S yerei® 1. 2. 3. Macfhukar Baghel, aged about 23 years, son of Shri Fekuram Baghel, resident of village Chataud, Post Dftondhetala, District Raipur (C.G.) • The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Health and Famlly Welfare (including Medfoal Education) D.K.S. Bhawan; Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) The Secretary, Department of Higher Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantratay, .Raipur(C.G) Guru Ghasidas University, Bilaspur, through the Chanoellor / The Govemor Chhattisgarh, Raj Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) '««' s \- - ''. -2- 4. 5. The Director, Medical Education State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) The Medioal Counoil of India, Evan a Galib Marg, New Delhi through its Registrar / Authorised Signatory, New Delhi. Present : Mr.V,R.Tiwari,(eamedcounselforthepetJtioners(W.P,No. 5917 of2005). Mr. S.K. Chandel, tearned counsel for tfie petitioner (W.P. No.3170f2006) . . Mr.Yashwant Singh, tearned Government Advocate fsr respondent State of Chhattisgarh. Mr.Manindra Shrivastava, learned Sr. Advocate with Mr. Amrito Das, learned counset for CIMS and University. Miss Samta Jain, leamed cpunsel for MCI. ORAL ORDER (Passedon 28U' February, 2006) Since the points involved in these writ petitions are substanually similar, theywere ctubbed, heard.them together and they are being disposed of by this oommon order. (2) The points thatarise for decision-making inthese writ petitiohs, it is stated at the Bar, are seized by the Apex Court in Writ Petition No. 6314 of 2005 and connected writ petttions filed uncter Artlole 32 ofthe Constltutton. In that view of the matter, 1 dispose of all these writ petitions, leaving open all the contentions raised by the parties in these writ petitions in their respective pteadings. No costs. (3) Haying considered the request of the learned counsel for the petittoners for extension of stay as well as the opposition raised by the University, 1 think it just and reasonable to continue the stay for a further period of one month from today. Accordingly, 1 direct that interim ordsr, wherever granted in thls bateh of writ petitlons, shall Oe in operatlon for a further period ofone month only from today. Sdf- ChiefJustice s^e^ '-^S^VS^KS:^