1 M.Cr.C. No. 7400 of 2011 07/12/2011 Shri Ravindra Singh, counsel for the applicant. Shri Mukund Bhardwaj, Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The applicant is in custody since 12/09/2011 in connection with Crime No.392/2011 registered at Police Station Civil Lines, District Vidisha for the offence punishable under Section 304 of IPC. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is a reputed citizen of the locality, who has no criminal past alleged against him. It is alleged against the applicant that he passed eclectic current on the fencing of his field and thereafter Ramdayal sustained injuries due to that electric shock and ultimately he died. Police registered a case under Section 304 of IPC. Actually,overt act alleged against applicant may fall within the purview of Section 304-A of IPC which is bailable. However, the applicant is in custody since 12/09/2011, he cannot be kept in custody for an unlimited period. Under such circumstances, he 2 prayed for bail. Learned Public Prosecutor for the State opposes the application. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any view on the merits of the case, I am of the view that application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. filed by applicant viz. Hakim Singh Maina may be accepted. Consequently, it is hereby allowed. It is directed that present applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a bond in sum of Rs.40,000/- (Rupees forty thousand) with one surety bond of the same amount to the satisfaction of the CJM, Vidisha to appear before the committal Court and the trial Court on the dates given by the concerned Courts. This order shall be effective till the end of trial but in case of bail jump, it shall become ineffective. Certified copy as per rules. ( N. K. Gupta) Judge mkb