1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 2189/2008 (Mukund Kisan Shende VERSUS Mahatma Fuley Shikshan Prasarak Mandal thr. Its President V.N. Kotole & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Mr. S.T. Harkare, counsel for the petitioner. CORAM : D.D.SINHA AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATE : JUNE 4, 2008. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. In the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondent to pay interest on the amount of Rs.20,551/-. It is not in dispute that on the earlier occasion, the petitioner had filed a petition which was disposed of by this Court with a direction to the present respondent nos.1 and 2 to pay Rs.20,551/-. It is also not in dispute that the said amount was paid to the petitioner immediately thereafter, and hence, the question of issuing direction to pay interest on the said amount does not arise, and therefore, the prayer made in the present writ petition in this regard cannot be granted. Similarly, other incidental prayers made in the petition, since the main prayer itself is not sustainable, cannot be granted. 2 Consequently, the petition suffers from lack of merits, the same is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE APTE