IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 366 OF 2006 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 366 OF 2006 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 366 OF 2006 M/s.Neel Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and others. ... Applicants. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and another. ... Respondents. Mr.Nitin Pradhan with Ms.S.D.Khot and Mahesh Pradhan for the applicants. Ms.M.H.Mhatre, APP for respondent No.1- State. J.A.Udaipuri i/b. Udaipuri & Co. for respondent No.2. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 27th September 2007. DATED: 27th September 2007. DATED: 27th September 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- . The parties to the revision application have filed consent terms dated 27th September, 2007 duly signed by the parties and countersigned by their respective advocates. The same are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The statements made therein are accepted and taken on record. 2. So far as costs of the proceedings are concerned, both parties have pleaded in the consent terms that amount costs to be quantified by the Court which shall bind both parties. In that view of the matter, costs of the proceedings are quantified in the sum of Rs.1,25,000/-. The applicant shall deposit the amount of costs in this Court for being paid to respondent No.2 or, in alternate, it would be open for the applicant to pay the amount of costs directly to respondent No.2 by drawing demand draft in his favour. 3. In the above view of the matter, offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act stands compounded subject to the compliance of this order. 4. Revision application stands disposed of in terms of consent terms and in terms of this order. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE