IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.8390 of 2010 Date of Decision.04.08.2011 Umed Singh Kataria son of Sh. Tek Chand Kataria .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana through its Home Affairs, Haryana, Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: None for the petitioner. Ms. Kirti Singh, DAG, Haryana. Mr. S.S. Dinarpur, Advocate for respondent Nos.8 to 18, 20 and 21. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. There is no representation for the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents states that there was already a civil litigation pending between the parties, which has been decided in favour of the respondents. If there is any threat perception that still persists, the petitioner is entitled to make a representation to the 3rd respondent-Superintendent of Police, Kurukshetra, who will consider the same and give appropriate protection for protection of his life and liberty, if the situation so warrants. 2. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 04, 2011 Pankaj*