1 D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13556/2008 (Suresh Chandra Choudhary Versus The State of Rajasthan & Others) Date of Order :: 22nd February, 2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RATHORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH BHAGWATI Mr. Abhinav Sharma, counsel for the petitioner Mr. S.N. Kumawat, AAG) counsel Mr. Shashi Shekhawat ) for the respondents Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner appeared in Rajasthan Judicial Service Examination, 2001 and was declared successful in written examination. He thereafter appeared in the interview. The petitioner has filed the instant writ petition seeking writ, order or direction directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner and give him appointment on a post in Rajasthan Judicial Service as against the recruitment made in the year 2001 with all consequential benefits in terms of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Rajasthan Public Service Commission Versus Rajesh Kumar Daria and others (Civil Appeal No. 2 3132 & 3773 of 2007) as extended to other petitioners therein. The aforesaid controversy has been settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court vide order dated 9th April, 2008, wherein the same selection was under consideration and the Hon'ble Supreme Court considering the submissions made on behalf of Rajasthan Public Service Commission has observed as under: “As the matter relates to a selection list dated 30.12.2001 which has already been given effect, the question of any other candidate challenging the selection at this belated stage or seeking similar relief, on the basis of our judgment, does not arise. There is, therefore, no cause for the apprehension. Review petitioners are, therefore, dismissed.” Since the Hon'ble Supreme Court in clear words has observed that question of any other candidate challenging the selection at this belated stage or seeking similar relief, on the basis of Rajesh Kumar Daria judgment, does not arise and it has further been observed that there was no cause for the apprehension of the 3 RPSC. Thus, Hon'ble Supreme Court does not find any merit in the writ petition and in view of the aforementioned observations made by Hon'ble Supreme Court, the writ petition fails being devoid of merit and the same stands dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to move the appropriate application before the Supreme Court. He may do so. (MAHESH BHAGWATI),J. (K.S. RATHORE),J. DK/-