IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4015 of 2004 BIMAL KUMAR SINGH SON OF JAGDISH KUMAR SINGH OF VILLAGE-SOUTH EKAUNA, P.S. UDWANT NAGAR, DISTRICT BHOJPUR. ……… …….… PETITIONER. Versus 1.THE GENERAL MANAGER-CUM-CHAIRMAN, POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED (A GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ENTERPRISES) B-9, QUTUB INSTITUTIONAL AREA, KATWARIA SARAI, NEW DELHI – 16. 2.THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, EASTERN REGIONAL HEAD QUARTER, ALANKAR PLACE (5TH FLOORS), BORING ROAD, PATNA-800001. 3.THE CHIEF ENGINEER-CUM-CHIEF MANAGER ARA TRANMISSION UNIT, POWER GRID, P.O. SOUTH EAKAUNA, P.S. UDWANTNAGAR, DISTRICT BHOJPUR. …….. ……… RESPONDENTS. ----------- 3. 23.6.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. After hearing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner realizing the fact that there is remedy already available to him under Rule 3 of the Works of Licensees Rules, 2006 published in the Gazette of India on 18.4.2006 has sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to make a representation before the District Magistrate, Bhojpur. Let him do so within a period six weeks with a copy of the present order and in case such representation is filed before the District Magistrate, Bhojpur within the stipulated period, he would be obliged to look into the grievance of the petitioner and after hearing the parties concerned would pass a reasoned order in terms of Rule 3 of the Works of Licensees Rules, 2006 published in the Gazette of India on 18.4.2006 within a period of four months thereafter. 2 With the above observation and direction, the writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn. Md.S. ( Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)