IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18708 of 2011 Upendra Jha, Son of Late Rameshwar Jha, resident of Professor Colony, Belbanwa, Motihari, P.O. Motihari, Police Station Motihari Town, District East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The B.R. Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur through its Vice Chancellor. 2. The Vice Chancellor, B.R. Ambedkar Bihar University, at & P.O. Muzaffarpur. 3. The Registrar, B.R. Ambedkar Bihar University, at & P.O. Muzaffarpur. 4. The Principal, M.S. College, Motihari, at & P.O. Motihari, District East Champaran. 5. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2. 20.10.2011. Heard Shri Prafull Chandra Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.1, 2 and 3/B.R.A. Bihar University and Shri Prabhu Narayan Sharma, learned A.C. to learned Advocate General, who appears on behalf of respondent no.5/State of Bihar. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 31.1.2008 as University Professor, Department of Chemistry from M.S. College, Motihari under B.R.A. Bihar University, has prayed for directing the respondents to pay arrear of pension in revised pay scale and other retiral dues. Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn my attention to Annexure-2 series 2 to the writ petition and submits that for the relief sought for in the present writ petition, the petitioner has approached the respondent no.2/Vice Chancellor, B.R.A. Bihar University. However, no decision has been taken nor the claim of retiral dues has been paid. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the fact that representation of the petitioner contained in Annexure-2 series is already pending before the respondent no.3/Registrar, B.R.A. Bihar University, the court is of the opinion that the writ petition can be disposed of directing the respondent no.3 to examine the representation contained in Annexure-2 to the writ petition in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. If respondent no.3 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for payment within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, respondent no.3 is required to pass a speaking order and communicate the same to 3 the petitioner within two months from the date of filing of such representation. The writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)