IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA -- LPA No.1527 of 2009 -- 1. Kedar Singh s/o Sadhu Singh, r/o village Jahangipur P.O. Karhari, P.S. Kurtha, District – Gaya (Arwal), presently C/o Jai lal Sao, Mohalla manikchand Talab, P.O. Anishabad, P.S. Gardanibagth, Patna 2. Mukesh kumar s/o Raj Kumar Singh, r/o village Daulatpur, P.O. Dahabiga, P.S. Hilsa, District – Nalanda 3. Poonam Kumari d/o Alakh Sharma, r/o village – Lahiyara, P.S. Phulwari District – Patna 4. Sanjay Kumar s/o Chandeshwar Prasad, r/o village Kurjichak, P.O. Mahmadpur. Via Khagaul, P.s. Phulwari, Patna 5. Asha Sinha w/o Kumar Birendra Kishore, r/o village – Abbupur, P.O. Shorampur, P.S. Phulwari, Patna 6. Manju Kumari d/o Ram Anugrah Lal Bhartuhar, r/o Md.Aslam Quarter, Kankarbagh, P.S. kankarbagh, Patna 7. Kandhan Kumari d/o Basudeo Thakur, r/o village Chhotaki Badalpura, Khagaul, P.S. Khagaul, Patna 8. Vishwanath Ram s/o Bhageran Ram, r/o village Admapur, P.O. Khanpur, Via – Dighwara, dariyapur, P.S. Dighwara, Saran 9. Rajesh Kumar Yadav s/o Abhinandan Prasad Yadav, r/o village Barhara, P.O. Gopalpur, Khagaria 10. Raj Kumar s/o Gulabchand, r/o Gaighat, P.O. Gulzarbagh, P.S. Alamganj, Patna 11. Firoz Alam s/o Ahmad Alam, r/o Sabzibagh, P.O. Bankipur, P.S. Pirbahore, Patna Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3. The Principal Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 4. The Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Bihar, Patna 5. The Deputy Secretary (Estb.), Department of Finance, Bihar, Patna ----------- 2 For the appellants: Mr. Mukul Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr.Lalit Kishore, AAG III --- 2 17/3/2010 Heard Mr. Mukul Prasad, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. Lalit Kishore, learned Additional Advocate General – III, for the State. It is submitted by Mr. Mukul Prasad, learned counsel for the appellants that the controversy is covered by the decision rendered in CWJC. No.7144 of 2009 (Nand Lal Prasad & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar & Ors.) disposed of on 4.3.2010. Mr. Lalit Kishore, learned counsel for the State, does not dispute the same. In view of aforesaid, the present appeal stands disposed of in terms of the order passed in CWJC. No.7144 of 2009 (supra). There shall be no order as to costs. Neyaz/ (Dipak Misra, CJ.) (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)