IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 12TH OCTOBER 2010 / 20TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 31247 of 2010(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M/S. SUHSHIV SECURITY SERVICES (PVT.) LTD., ROOM NO.1, BLDG.NO.427/E, KOLAVELI SHOPPING CENTRE, SWARAJ NAGAR, KAKKANAD P.O., COCHIN, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SRI. LT.CDR N.C.SEKHARAN (RETD.) BY ADV. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVT., GOVT. TELECOMMUNICATIONS, GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RE-SETTLEMENT, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, GOVT. OF INDIA, WEST BLOCK-4, R.K.PURAM, NEW DELHI. 3. THE BHARATH SANCHAR NIGAM LTD., REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR, CORPORATE OFFICE, 301, STATEMAN HOUSE, BHARATHAMBA ROAD, NEW DELHI-1. 4. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, TELECOM, KERALA CIRCLE BHARATH SANCHAR NIGAM LTD., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-33. 5. THE PRINCIPAL GENERAL MANAGER, TELECOM, BHARATH SANCHAR NIGAM LTD., PALAKKAD. 6. THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF THE GENERAL MANAGER, TELECOM, PALAKKAD. ADV. SRI.T.P.M.IBRAHIM KHAN,ASST.S.G FOR R1 & 2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SI. P. N. SANTOSH SC SRI. C.S. RAMANADHAN FOR R5 &R6 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/10/2010 A/W.WP(c).No. 31282/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) Nos.31247/2010 & 31282/2010 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioners is an agency providing security guards to the various establishments of BSNL. 2. In so far as WP(c)No.31247/2010 is concerned, the claim of the petitioner is that the security guards deployed by them are entitled to be paid bonus and HRA. 3. In so far as WP().No.31282/2010 is concerned, the contention is that the security guards deployed by the petitioner are entitled for HRA. 4. It is seen that urging this claim the petitioner in WP(c). No.31247/2010 has filed Exts.P12 and P13 representations and the petitioner in WP(c).No.31282/2010 filed Ext.P8 and P9 representations. These representations are stated to be pending before the 6th respondent. 5. As at present, since the claim of the petitioner has not been decided by the respondents, it is directed that the 6th respondent shall consider and pass orders on the aforesaid representations in accordance with law. This the 6th respondent WPC.Nos. 31247/2010 & 31282/2010 :2 : shall do as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 4 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of these writ petitions. Writ Petitions are disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/