Lrs IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No.5764/2009 Mrs Mohite Pushpa Chandramani ..Petitioner. vs. Padmashree Annasaheb Jadhav Bhartiya Samaj Unnati Mandal and others. ..Respondents. Mrs Anita A. Agrawal for the Petitioner. Mr N.V.Bandiwadekar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr S.N. Patil, A.G.P., for Respondent No.6 to 8. CORAM: D.K. DESHMUKH AND A.R.JOSHI,JJ DATED: 5TH JANUARY,2010 P.C.:- The grievance of the petitioner who is working as Librarian in a school governed by the provisions of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Services) Regulation Act,1977 is that she has not been given preference in appointment to the post of an Assistant Teacher as per letter dated 18.9.1995 issued by the Director of Education. It appears that post of the Assistant Teacher was advertised but the petitioner was not selected. There are no allegations of malice made against the members of Selection Committee, therefore, there is no question of we interfering with the selection process. So far as letter dated 18.9.1995 is concerned, the Division Bench of this Court vide the order dated 10.12.2009 in W.P. No. 1850/2009 (Sunita Chandrakant v.State of Maharashtra and ors) has already held that the instructions given by the Director for reservation of 25% of the posts for promotion in the cadre of Assistant Teacher are invalid and contrary to the provisions of M.E.P.S., Act. In this view of the matter, petition cannot be entertained. It is rejected. (D.K. DESHMUKH,J) (A.R.JOSHI,J)