1 app175.10.sxw ssm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 175 OF 2010 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2968 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO. 2707 OF 2005 Deepak Ramdeo Tyagi ...Appellant. Vs. Shanta Gopal Shetty & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. Satyen Vaishnawa i/by M/s. N.N. Vishnawa & Co. for the Appellant. Dr. Birendra Saraf a/w Ms. Pooja Kshirsagar i/by M/s. Bhandary and Bhandary for Respondents. CORAM : P.B.MAJMUDAR & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 8th September, 2010 P.C.:- 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order which is challenged in this appeal as the learned Single Judge has given cogent reasons for not granting interim reliefs. The proceedings before the learned Single Judge initiated by the plaintiff, are under Section 6 of the Specific Reliefs Act. Such suit is required to be heard expeditiously. If ultimately the Plaintiffs succeeds in the said suit, the Court can pass all consequential orders as deem fit. In the meanwhile, even if the properties are transfered, the same shall be subject 2 app175.10.sxw ssm to the final outcome of the suit. Considering the same we do not find any substance in the present Appeal. 2 Subject to what is stated above, the present Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (P.B. MAJMUDAR, J.)