1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.315 OF 2009 (Ashok s/o Pandurangji Thakre vs. State and others) ___________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 6, 2009 Heard Mrs. Ambulkar, learned Counsel for the petitioner. The petition is directed against the order dated 10.10.2008 passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal whereby original application of the petitioner came to be rejected on the ground that transfer of the petitioner was effected by invoking Clause (i) of sub-section (4) of Section 4 of the Maharashtra Government Servants Regulation of Transfers and Prevention of Delay in Discharge of Official Duties Act, 2005. The learned Counsel for the petitioner is unable to point out anything in order to demonstrate that the respondents could not have invoked the provisions of the said Section of the Act. In absence thereof, it is difficult for us to appreciate 2 the contentions canvassed by the learned Counsel for the petitioner. No case is made out for showing indulgence. The petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE khj