IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 3229 of 2009 Date of decision: 11.07.2011 ________________________________________________________________________ Banarso Devi. .....Petitioner. Versus Union of Indian & others. .....Respondents. Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, J. 1 Whether approved for reporting? ________________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Dushyant Dadwal, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, ASGI, with Ms. Anita Dogra, CGSI. V.K. Sharma, J. (Oral). The petitioner, who is widow of an ex Indian Army Personnel, has filed the present petition on the following substantive prayer: “The present petition may kindly allowed and the impugned Annexure P-15 may kindly be quashed & set- aside being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and illogical by issuing a writ of certiorari with the further directions to the respondents to pay her the family pension by issuing a writ of mandamus, which is rightful & genuine due of the petitioner for which the respondents are duty bound as early as possible & in the interest of justice.” 2. Since it is a matter pertaining to pension of a retired Indian Army Personnel, the matter is required to be forwarded to the Armed Forces Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench for disposal in accordance with law in terms of sub Section 2(a) of Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007. Ordered accordingly. The records be sent to the said tribunal forthwith. 3. Insofar as this Court is concerned, the petition so also pending CMP(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (V.K. Sharma) Judge 11th July, 2011 (virender) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?