IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8170 of 2009 ANAND KUMAR ROY, S/o Nirmal Kumar Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 09.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that parties come from the same family, though theft was reported to the Police, who submitted charge-sheet also against one Nirmal Kumar showing allegation against this petitioner false. Nirmal has already been allowed bail by a Bench of this Court. So, petitioner’s arrest cannot be justified. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Barhara P.S. Case No. 97 of 2005, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Purnea subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)