In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 6973 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: November 30, 2009 Rahul Sethi .. Petitioner Vs. Varsha Sethi and another .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Tribhuvan Dahiya, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N. Jindal, J The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 10.11.2009 (Annexure P/1) passed by the learned District Judge, Family Court, Faridabad. The petitioner- husband is a practicing lawyer and a financier earning Rs.25,000/- per month. The respondents Varsha Sethi and Master Krrish Sethi aged about 3 years are wife and son of the petitioner. They have already been awarded a sum of Rs.1500/- per month under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act during the pendency of the appeal before the High Court. The Family Court at Faridabad had awarded Rs.2500/- per month to both the respondents under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. as maintenance pendente-lite. The application is still to be decided on merits. The maintenance pendente-lite awarded to the respondent and her child is quite reasonable. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. Before parting with the order, it is made clear that the amount of Rs.1500/- per month already awarded by this Court would be adjusted against the maintenance awarded under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for that period. November 30, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge