HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BiLASPUR Petitioner OF. Shyam Lal Mohobiya S/o. Late Shri Maniram IViohobiya Age about 45 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Murmunda, Block - Dongargam, Distt. - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Paras Ram Sinha S/o. Shri Chinta.Ram sinha Age about 43 years, Asslstant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Hardi CTeka), Block - Dongargaon, Distt. - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Bhaggu Ram Verma S/o Late Shri Hari Ram Verma Age about 45 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Kanhardabari, Block - Dongargaon, Distt. - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) \ Versus State of Chhattisoarh, Through Secretary, Tribal & Education Department D.K.S. Shav/an, Dlstt.- Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) rit Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india) ilnale Bench: Hon'ble Justice Satlsh K. <sj, Present : Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitloner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt. Advocata for the State/ respodents. ORDER (Passed on 3"' July, 2007) The question of law invoived is as to whether the petltioner ia entitled te regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of inltia! appointment or from the date ofcomptetion of probation period. '? i '. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as forthe respondents/SSate jointly submit that the facts and questlon of law involved In the present writ petition are the same to that of in W.P. (S) No.5976/2006 (Sushil Tlwari and others Vs.State Government of 7'.. 2^ hhattlssarh and others), which was a!!owed vide order dated <~kk •I '< ^ . 1 i .^ V. 3. Ih view of the above-stated submlssions made by learned counse! appearing for the partfes, the writ petition is aliowed in the same terms subiecS to verification of the facts. No order as to costs. Indu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ia. -^< ;,^\