IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 27TH OCTOBER 2011 / 5TH KARTHIKA 1933 OP(C).No. 3453 of 2011(O) ---------------------- IA 1930/2011 IN OS.111/2006 of SUB COURT, MANJERI .................. PETITIIONERS : ---------------------- 1. ABDUL KHADER, S/O.MUHAMMED , POOLAKKAL KARIMBANAKKAL, KARUMARAKKAD AMSOM DESOM, ERNAD TALUK. 2. SADIYA BAKKAR, W/O.DECEASED MUHAMMED AYOOB'S , KARUUMARAKKAD AMSOM DESOM, ERNAD TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.V.N.RAMESAN NAMBISAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. DR.VIJAYAN, VALIYAPARAMBIL APPUKUTTAN, CHIYARAM PO, THRISSUR TALUK, THRISSUR, PIN 674 001. 2. UMMUBARKKATH, W/O.POOLAKKAL KARIMBNAKKAL MUHAMMED, KARUMARAKKAD AMSOM DESOM, ERNAD TALUK, PIN 673 640. 3. AHAMMED KABEER, S/O.POOLAKKAL KARIMBNAKKAL MUHAMMED, KARUMARAKKAD AMSOM DESOM, ERNAD TALUK, PIN 673 640. 4. P.K.SAREENA, D/O.POOLAKKAL KARIMBNAKKAL MUHAMMED, KARUMARAKKAD AMSOM DESOM, ERNAD TALUK, PIN 673 640. 5. SAJIDA FATHIMA, D/O.POOLAKKAL KARIMBNAKKAL MUHAMMED, KARUMARAKKAD AMSOM DESOM, ERNAD TALUK, PIN 673 640. ...2/- OP(C).No. 3453 of 2011(O) -2- 6. RASHEEDALI, S/O.KAVUTHODI BEERANKUTTY, PO AAKKODE, PIN 673 640. 7. ISLAMIC CENTRE VIRIPPADAM, (REPRESENTED BY PUTHUSSERY KUNHIMUHAMMED'S SON MUSTAFA HUDAVI, KARUMARAKKAD AMSOM DESOM, ERNAD TALUK) PIN 673 640. BY THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- O.P.(C) No.3453 of 2011 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of October, 2011. JUDGMENT This Original Petition is in challenge of Ext.P3, order passed by the learned Sub Judge, Manjeri on I.A.No.1930 of 2011 in O.S.No.111 of 2006 refusing to send the document in question to the expert for opinion. 2. Learned counsel, after arguing the matter for some time has sought permission to withdraw this Original Petition without prejudice to the right of petitioners to raise all their contentions in the course of trial in the respective suits. 3. I have heard learned counsel for respondents 2 and 3 also. 4. Having regard to the submission made, I am inclined to allow the request. Resultantly this Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the right of petitioners to raise all their contentions raised in their pleadings in the respective suits, as provided under law. THOMAS P.JOSEPH, Judge. cks