IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 725 of 2009 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 17/12/2008 in WP NO : 16196 OF 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 The Secretary to Government, Education Department, Government of A.P. Hyderabad. 2 The Director of School Education, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 The Collector and District Magistrate, East Godavari District, Kakinada. 4 The District Educational Officer, East Godavari , Kakinada. 5 The Deputy Educational Officer, Pitapuram, East Godavari District. ..... APPELLANT(S) AND 1 Blue Star Convent Elementary/High School, Rep by its Correspondent Smt. V. Kameswari, Pithapuram, East Godavari District. 2 Smt. V. Kameswari, W/o. Late V.V. Raman Rao, Blur Star Convent Elementary/High School, Pithapuram, East Godavari District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondents : SRI V.S.R.ANJANEYALU The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO :725 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR) Since the appeal is preferred against the interlocutory order passed by the learned single in WVMP No.3951 of 2008 and WPMP No.33348 of 2008 in WP No.16196 of 2008, dated 17.12.2008, We have heard both the learned Counsel. On the earlier occasion, when the matter was heard, we had directed the learned Counsel for the respondents to file an affidavit affirming that the 2nd respondent, while functioning as correspondent, shall undertake to function without giving any scope to make any comments against the discharge of her functioning and she will strictly implement the directions of the District Educational Officer. An affidavit accordingly has been filed by the 2nd respondent, which is taken on record. The order impugned in the writ appeal notices that the order of removal of the 2nd respondent from the office of Correspondent, which is impugned in the writ petition, was kept in abeyance by this Court by order, dated 25.7.2008 and later the impugned order is passed, while making the said interim order absolute. It was further directed that the 2nd respondent herein shall be allowed to continue as Correspondent under the control of the District Educational Officer, Kakinada, East Godavari District and the 2nd respondent shall furnish the details of working pattern to the District Educational Officer once in a week i.e., on every Friday and shall abide by the directions of the District Educational Officer regarding smooth administration of the school. In view of the fact that the affidavit of the 2nd respondent, as directed, is filed as referred to above, nothing further survives to be considered in this appeal. Subject to the observation as above, the writ appeal is dismissed confirming the orders of the learned single Judge dated 17.12.2008. Registry is directed to post the writ petition in usual course. _______________________ Justice T.Meena Kumari ___________________________ Justice Vilas V. Afzulpurkar Dated: 28th April, 2009 nn THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO :725 of 2009 (Judgment of the Division Bench delivered by the Hon’ble Sri Justice VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR) 28th April, 2009