CRM No.M- 16672 of 2010 Present: Mr.K.K.Goel, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Ajaib Singh, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab. Mr.A.K.Walia, Advocate for the complainant. **** Learned counsel states that he has not pressed the application on behalf of petitioner No.2. As regards petitioner No.1, learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that no blow or injury has been attributed to the petitioner No.1. In the circumstances, this fact has not to be considered. Learned counsel for the complainant, however, states that the petitioner No.1 has put pistol to the head of the complainant. In my opinion, it would be in the interest of justice, if the concession of anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner No.1 and to release him in the event of arrest subject to the provisions of Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.. At this stage, learned Additional Advocate General states that it would be appropriate if a date is fixed on which the petitioner No.1 can appear before the Investigating Officer. Learned counsel agree on this suggestion. In the circumstances, the petitioner No.1 is directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on 14.06.2010 at 10.00 a.m. With the above direction, the petition is disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE June 08, 2010 sukhpreet