1 crap2976.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2976 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION ST. NO. 150 OF 2011 Eknath s/o Bhagwan Patil ...Applicant VERSUS The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ..... Shri R.S.Shinde, advocate holding for Shri A.S.Sawant, advocatde for applicant Smt. Y.M.Kshirsagar , A.P.P. for respondent ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : 27 th July, 2011 PER COURT : 1 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2 This is an application preferred by the applicant for condonation of delay of 52 days caused in filing the accompanying Criminal Revision Application against the judgment and order, dated 8.2.2011, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, 2 crap2976.11 in Criminal Appeal No. 44 of 2006. 3 Smt. Y.M.Kshirsagar, learned A.P.P. for the respondent opposed the application vehemently and submitted that the present application is without any substance and same is devoid of any merits and same be dismissed. 4 For the reasons stated in the application, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily and it further appears that the delay caused in filing the accompanying application is not willful, deliberate and intentional and same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 5 Hence, present Criminal Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B' thereof and delay of 52 days caused in filing the accompanying Criminal Revision Application stands condoned and the accompanying Criminal Revision Application be registered and numbered and present application stands disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE), JUDGE. dbm/crap2976.11