IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5538 of 2002 Date of decision : 26-08-2010 Gurbachan Kaur .... Petitioner VERSUS Baldev Raj ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Amardeep Singh Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Navdeep, Advocate, for Mr. G.S. Sandhawalia, Advocate, for the respondent. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (Oral) Counsel for the respondent – landlord submits that during the pendency of the petition, petitioner – tenant has vacated the premises and, therefore, the present revision petition has been rendered infructuous. Counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to controvert the statement made by counsel for the respondent. Thus, the present revision petition is disposed of as such with liberty to revive the same in case, statement made by counsel for the respondent is not correct. (KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA) 26-08-2010 JUDGE manju