36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CO. A(SB) 4/2008 & CO. APPL. 216/2008 SU}IAS CHAKMA Appellant Through: Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Advocate. versus SOUTH ASIA HUMAN RIGHTS DOCUMENTATION CENTRE PVT. LTD. & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anuradha Mukherjee, Advocate with Ms. Jyoti Dastidar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN ORDER % 08.11.2011 Today, in Court, the costs imposed vide order dated 07th July, 4 2011 has been paid to the learned counsel for respondent. With consent of both the learned counsel, the impugned drder dated 26th November, 2007 passed by the Company Law Board is set aside in view of the judgment passed by this Court in Co. A(SB) 9/20 11 titled as Charanjit Khanna & Ors. Vs. MIs. Khanna Paper Mills Ltd. & Ors., decided on 20th April, 2011 and the appellant is given liberty to file a consolidated Company Petition under Section 397 and 398 read with Section lilA of the Companies Act, 1956. Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified PO4 Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for appellant states that the appellant would file a fresh composite petition within a period of four weeks. Both the learned counsel request the Court that the aforesaid order should be without prejudice to their rights and contentions and they should be given liberty to raise all issues before the Company Law Board. With the aforesaid liberty, present appeal and pending application are disposed of Needless to say, the Company Law Board shall decide t the matter without being influenced by any observations made by this Court. L1 MANMOHAN,J NOVEMBER 08, 2011 is & I •':