IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No.273 of 2011 Date of decision: 9.8.2011 Surender Kumar and others ….Petitioners. Versus Kuldeep and others ….Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Deepak Gupta, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioners: Mr. T.S.Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents: None. _____________________________________________________________________ Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed against the order dated 30.5.2011 whereby the prayer made by the legal heirs of respondent No.35 seeking permission to file additional written statement has been rejected. 2. This case is at the argument stage and I do not feel it is appropriate to interfere in this matter at this stage. Therefore, the petition is rejected in limine. It is, however, made clear that this Court has not given any finding on the questions raised and in case the suit is finally decided against the present petitioners they shall be at liberty to raise the points raised in this petition in the appeal to be filed by them. No costs. 9th August, 2011 (Deepak Gupta) ™ Judge. 1 Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes.