THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.M.A.No.529 of 2010 JUDGMENT: The appellant filed O.S.No.748 of 2005 in the Court of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, against the respondents, for the relief of perpetual injunction, in respect of the suit schedule property. The suit was dismissed by the trial Court. Aggrieved thereby, the appellant filed A.S.No.132 of 2010 in the Court of II Additional District Judge, Vijayawada. He has also filed I.A.No.1929 of 2010 under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C., for grant of temporary injunction. After hearing both the parties, the lower Appellate Court dismissed the I.A., on 21.06.2010. Hence, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. Heard Sri Srinivasa Varma, learned counsel for the appellant, and Sri C.V.R.Rudra Prasad, learned counsel for the respondents. There is some uncertainty, as to the state of affairs that existed during the pendency of the suit. The trial Court granted an order of status quo at the initial stage, subject to certain condition. It appears that the I.A. was not dealt with by the trial Court, till the suit was disposed of. It was only on 29.04.2010 that the I.A. was dismissed, on the ground that the suit itself was dismissed. Therefore, it cannot be said that there was no interim order operating during the pendency of the suit, in one form or the other. The lower Appellate Court expressed its doubt, as to the nature of arrangement that existed during the pendency of the suit. The suit property is said to be vacant land. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if they are required to maintain status quo, obtaining as on today, till the disposal of the appeal. Hence, the C.M.A. is allowed, and the order under appeal is set aside. Consequently, I.A.No.1929 of 2010 shall stand allowed, directing that the respondents shall maintain status quo, vis-à-vis the suit schedule property, till the disposal of the appeal. The lower Appellate Court shall dispose of the appeal, as early as possible, preferably within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Dated:16.07.2010 GJ