1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.07.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.M.YUSUF EQBAL, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.JYOTHIMANI W.P.(MD).No.7789 of 2011 G.Samuvel, Represented through His power of attorney, N.Rajendran S/o.Nagu Thevar, Door No.4/260, Melavaniyar Street, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. : Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Paramakudi. 4.C.Veluchamy : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to remove all encroachments in the Government Poramboke land situates at Kattuparamakudi, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram in S.No.499/2 and in the adjacent Government Poramboke land and further directing the respondents to remove the wall illegally put up by the fourth respondent on the pathway leading to the house site of the petitioner in S.No.499/3 so as to enable the petitioner to have a free access to his house site by considering the representations dated 21.06.2011 and 27.06.2011. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Sasikumar O R D E R [Order of the Court was made BY THE CHIEF JUSTICE] The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to remove all encroachments in the Government Poramboke land situate at Kattuparamakudi, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram in S.No.499/2 and in the adjacent Government Poramboke land and further direct the respondents to remove the wall illegally put up by the fourth respondent on the pathway leading to the house site of the petitioner in S.No.499/3 so as to enable the petitioner to have a free access to his house site by considering the representations dated 21.06.2011 and 27.06.2011. 2. The petitioner's case is that the house site comprised within S.No.499/3 was allotted to him by virtue of an assignment order and the said house site is in his possession and enjoyment. The fourth respondent, who is his neighbour, encroached a Government Poramboke land and put up a tiled house. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3. At the very outset, we are of the view that it is a private dispute between the petitioner and the fourth respondent. Apart from that, such a Writ Petition filed through the power of attorney holder is deprecated. The extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot be invoked in this manner. If the petitioner has any grievance, he may approach the appropriate authority. No relief can be granted in this Writ Petition, which is accordingly dismissed. No costs. The Registrar [Judicial] is directed to explain as to how this kind of defective Writ Petitions filed through power of attorney holder are numbered and placed before Bench for admission. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Paramakudi. +1CC TO MR.D.SASIKUMAR, ADVOCATE SR.24527 +1CC TO THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER SR.24608 NB/gb SR : 02.08.2011 : 2p/6c ORDER MADE IN W.P.(MD).No.7789 of 2011 25.07.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/