BEFORE THE M.P. STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL BENCH _ RAIPUR O.A. N0. /2001 '^ APPLICANT NON-APPLICANT ^' KU. ROSHAN ARA Asstt. Professor Dept.of History Govt. College Dhamtari Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of M.P. through the Secretary Department of Higher Education Govt. of M.P. Vallabh Bhawan Bhopal (M.P.) 2. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary Department of Higher Education D.K.S. Bhavan Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Commissioner Higher Education Govt. of M.P. Satpuda Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) 4. The Commissioner Higher Education Govt. of Chhattisgarh D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur Chhattisgarh 5. The Principal, Govt. College Dhamtari Dhamtari (C.G.) ORIGINAL APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE M.P. STATE ADMIN1STRATIVE TRIBUNAL ACT, 1985 w HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.4507 OF 2005 PETITIONER Ku.RoshanAra Versus RESPONDENTS State of Madhya Pradesh and others Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: - Shri Manish Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. Shri A. V. Shridhar, Panel La\,vyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 171" day of November, 2009) With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the petition is heard finally. (2) At the very outset, iearned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the question of law involved jn the present case is squarely covered by various decisions of the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal (for short "the Tribunal"), as is evident from Annexure-A/4 to A/9. Learned counsel further submits that in view of the settled law, at this stage, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a representation before the respondent No.1 and prays that a direction may be issued to the respondent authorities for deciding the representation of the petitioner expeditiously. To this prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State has no objection. (3) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. If the petitioner makes a representation within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order, the same is expected to be decided by the respondent authorities within a further period of three months from the date of its receipt strictly in accordance with law, in the light of the aforementioned decisions of the Tribunal. __ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Tumane