IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1653 of 2005 1. SATISH CHNADRA SINGH, son of Nirdhan Mahto, resident Of Village Rampur parori, P.S. Sitamarhi, Dist. Sitamarhi 2. Mahesh Pathak, son of Shri Mathur Pathak, resident Of village & P.S. Sitamarhi, Dist. Sitamarhi 3. Ram Vilash Singh, son of Kishori Singh, resident of Village Bhaluaha, P.S. Pathmakar, P.S. Bathnaha, Dist. Sitamarhi 4. Shiv Kumar Jha, son of late Kamdeo Jha, resident of Village, P.S. Parshouni, Dist. Sitamarhi 5. Virendra Kishore, son of Sri Ghanpat Rai, resident Of Village Siraiya, P.O. Narha, Dist. Sitamarhi 6. Nagendra Singh, son of Sri Sigashwar Singh, Resident of Village Rupolli, P.O. Bathnah, Dist. Sitamarhi 7. Suresh Prasad, son of Ram Shwarath Prasad, resident Of Village Bhab Prasad, P.S. Dumra, P.O. Bishw Anathpur Dumara, Dist. Sitamarhi 8. Dineshwar Prasad, son of Mahendra Prasad, resident Of Village Japharpur, P.O. Belsondm, Dist. Sitamarhi 9. Natuk Dhari Mahto, son of Sri Haman Mahto, resident Of Village Rampur, Parorix, P.S. Sitamarhi, Dist. Sitamarhi 10. Shyam Chandra Choudhary, son of Sri Yogendra Chaudhary, resident of Village Purnahiya Pokhar Raghopur, Bakhari, Dist. Sitamarhi 11. Sheo Shankar Jha, son of Shri Ram Lakhan Jha Resident of Village Jahpharpur, P.O. Belsond Dist. Sitamarhi 12. Lalbabu Rai, son of Sri Kailash Rai, resident of Village Bhab Prasad, P.O. Parmanandpur, Dist. Sitamarhi 13. Subodh Kumar Jha, son of Sri Bedanand Jha, Resident of Village & P.O. Parshoumi, Dist.Sitamarhi 14. Raj Kishore Yadav, son of Sri Bizen Yadav, resident Of Village & P.O. Ranjitpur, Riga, Dist. Sitamarhi 15. Shankar Mukhia, son of Sri Baran Mukhia, resident Of Village & P.O. Bathnaga, Dist. Sitamarhi-petitioners Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR through Ex-Collector, Sitamarhi Sri Arun Bhushan Prasad 2.The Collector, Sitamarhi Sri Suman Kumar 3.Shri Indradeo Paswan, the office Superintendent Collectoriate, Sitamarhi---------------opp.parties ----------- 3. 07.01.2010 No one appears for the petitioners. 2 In the show cause filed by the opposite parties it is stated that the order under contempt has been complied with and after following the selection process the petitioners have been selected for appointment, and the issuance of appointment letters is awaiting the receipt of budgetary provision from the concerned administrative department. In the above circumstances, the contempt application is dismissed. (Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.) spal/