IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.35790 of 2011 Farzo Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 25.10.2011 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioner in a Police case under Sections 392/411 of the Penal Code is that on the face of the allegations at best Section 379 IPC may be made out and there are no ingredients to attract Sections 390/392 IPC. He is in custody since 29.4.2011. It has been acknowledged that the petitioner has antecedent of two more cases under Section 392 IPC. As per the allegations he was apprehended on the spot and money recovered. Keeping in mind his propensity to crime the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail presently. If he renews his prayer for bail before the court below after at least one year of custody, which the Court considers sufficient as a restraint in view of his propensity to crime, let the same be considered on its own merit without being prejudice by the present order. This application is rejected. Snkumar/ (Navin Sinha,J.)