1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5243 OF 2009 Sai Paper Mills and another ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents ..... Mr. K.S. Bhore, advocate for the petitioners Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 and 2. ..... CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR & S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATED: 12TH JANUARY, 2010 PER COURT:- 1 Not on board. Heard civil application No. 207 of 2010, which was on board today. By consent, taken on board. 2 Limited relief prayed by the petitioners is to issue direction to the respondent Nos. 1 or 2 to conduct enquiry independently against respondent No.5 in respect of allegations made by the petitioners. Learned A.G.P. on instructions states that as of today, no enquiry has been instituted. Considering this, the respondent shall treat this writ 2 petition as representation of the petitioners and take appropriate decision thereon. If the petitioners are able to make out a case, the concerned respondent would examine the possibility of instituting enquiry against the respondent No.5. On the other hand, if it is found that no such enquiry is necessary, may pass appropriate order in that behalf and record its reasons in support of that opinion. This be done as expeditiously as possible and preferably within eight weeks from today. In the event that the respondent decides to institute enquiry against respondent No.5, that enquiry shall be completed as expeditiously as possible, preferably within six months from its commencement. Petition disposed of on the above terms. 3 Office to issue copy of this order to the parties concerned, duly authenticated by the Sheristedar of this court. ( S. S. SHINDE. J.) (A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.) rlj/