HIGH ((it Ri ‘..Ft’AL WRICFS UIMMLrrEE DI-flRV4D BEFORP THE 10K ADALAT NTI.HT 4( Rr KARNATAKA RCTI BT’N(T-IA DATFD THIS Tilt urn DAY OF JANUARY 2011 (O’i( THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.PATIL SRI K L PATE, MEMBER I:A N(’ 2j_OF_20Gb_ 1 MVJ Lnk Aclalat No 435 2011’ RFTW E’ V iliappa _‘ .‘.1i; .J—I S/fl Bc.ppa I-L:d p.’d ged 58 e FS as q- ni “ 4 r: rjle’i: C t t) .‘ I ‘I I ) i’c ‘U ‘,. 1’ ii S. La I % t’ ‘1 I . •• 13 1 1 2 Hospet Respondents (By Sri. Prakash S Udikeri, Advocate for Ri, Sri. B.C. Seetharam Rao & R.R.Mane, Advs. for R2) This MFA is tiled U/S 173(1) of MV Act against the Judgment and Award dated:05/05/2008 passed in MVC No.520/2005 on the file of the Member, MACT No.11, Bagalkot, partly allowing the Claim Petition for compensation & seeking enhancement of Compensation. This Appeal coming on for conciliation before Lok Adalat, after being referred by the Court, the following Conciliation Order is passed. CONCILIATION ORDER The learned counsel for the appellant, the learned counsel for the second respondent and its representative are present. 2. After due deliberation in the matter, they have arrived at a settlement. The second respondent has agreed to pay a sum of flO,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) without interest, in addition to the amount already awarded by the Tribunal. The Appellant has agreed to receive the said amount in full and final settlement of the claim. Tin eco rcsDolkn as w d to iep)si flit amount be’re the Ti ibunal ‘ithin six tks from t I tb ,r ai t v f tEe ‘u id iii g si ch tie ar 1 cnt %aC ii n _r tc r st n the i’e v’i ann ‘ from the datt ‘4 drfa’ift. till the date of deposit 4 Thr parties have filed a Taint Mcmn in terms I thur cttler ient The scttlement is i the best t i-c 1-c r tits n I hc.rsfor ac pt cc’ iii- 1’. J dgu ntaic 1 addet -1 u ,u- ‘Ou na sen n MtC N. 5fl. .SO 01 ilK tilt )f the Menitnbt. M( ‘I Ni II &walknt tnJq modified in n t J Vie eitre erjjiaiired anoun: ‘-k i hr iclcased in I Gal 19.’ ‘a’0C 1 t .. ft i ii X i