IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.896 of 2007 DIPAK KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 7 18.03.2009. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is aggrieved by some of the findings recorded in order dated 6.8.2006, Annexure 10 passed by the SDM, Masaurhi under section 144 Cr.P.C. in Case no. 214 of 2007. Learned counsel for the State submits that the SDM has passed correct order, Section 144 Cr.P.C. in very clear words states that order passed hereunder shall remain in force only for the period of two months from the date of its making. In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the order in question. The writ petition stands disposed of. It goes without saying that findings recorded in 144 Cr.P.C. will not prejudice parties in any proceeding. In case, any of the parties has violated the aforesaid order during course of proceeding, it would be open to either parties to move appropriate court for its grievances. Shashi. (S.P.Singh,J)