THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 18 OF 2011 ORDER: 1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the docket order dated 30.09.2010 in I.A. No.359 of 2010 in O.S. No.8 of 2008 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Kadiri, whereunder and whereby the application filed under Order XVIII Rule 3A read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘CPC’) to permit the respondent/plaintiff to give evidence as P.W.2, was allowed. 2. Heard. 3. The suit is filed by the General Power of Attorney (GPA) holder of the respondent/plaintiff, for declaration of title over the plaint schedule property as well as movables and for delivery of possession. It is not in dispute before this Court that GPA holder of the respondent/plaintiff filed affidavit in lieu of chief examination as P.W.1, but, in view of the fact that he is not doing well, the present application is filed to examine the respondent/plaintiff as P.W.2. The evidence of GPA holder as P.W.1 has been eschewed. Therefore, for all practical purposes, the evidence of GPA holder cannot be looked into for determination of the issues. Now, respondent/plaintiff, being the plaintiff, she can as well come to the witness box and testify the same. Therefore, the trial Court rightly allowed the petition, and there are no grounds to interfere with the same. 4. The Civil Revision Petition is devoid of merit and is, accordingly, dismissed at the stage of admission. No costs. --------------------- (K.C.Bhanu, J.) 31.1.2011 DRK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 18 OF 2011 31.1.2011 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 18 OF 2011 31.1.2011 Between: Talupula Laxmi Prasad Reddy …Petitioner And Pamuluri Laxmamma @ P.Laxmidevi …Respondent