Contempt Case No.748 of 2011 16.12.2011 Shri S.M. Bapat, counsel for applicant. Shri S.D. Bohra, counsel for respondents. Respondent No.2-Shri Arun Kochar and respondent No.3-Shri Nilesh Raghuvanshi are also present in person. This petition has been filed to draw contempt proceeding against respondents for the alleged non-compliance of the order dated 19.4.2011 passed in Writ Petition No.8627 of 2009. It is not disputed that the later part of the order relating to krammonati has been complied with by the respondents. The only grievance is with regard to the consequential benefits. According to Shri Bapat, it would include the relief of consideration for promotion to the next higher post from the post of Lecturer, as respondent No.5, in the original petition, has been granted further promotion. After hearing learned counsel, we are of the opinion that this cannot be agitated in a contempt petition. In view of the aforesaid, we do not find any merit and substance for drawing a contempt. Accordingly the same is dismissed. The rule-nisi issued against the respondents is hereby discharged. [S.K.SETH] JUDGE BDJ