^-3-^^ ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (C) No. A^l/\^ /2010 PETITIONERS ^ Oo' ^^ . ^' ^ y;>y ^' ^ s? .y^y /y/ <~.y ^ 1. Praveen Kumar Pathak, aged about 40 years, S/o Late Shri Prakash Narayan Pathak. 2. "Prafulla Kumar Pathak, aged ' about 35 years, S/o late Shri Prakash Narayan Pathak. Both Resident of near Laxmi Narayan Mandir, Polsaipar, P.0. &Distt. Durg(C.G.). 3. Pratibha Dixit, aged about 42 years, D/o Late Prakash Narayan Pathak, W/o Shri Akhilesh Dixit, R/o Qtr. No. 14/B, Street No. 36, Sector-4, P.0. & Distt. Durg (C.G.). VERSUS •. ^^ \ m^I^^-l f RESPONDENTS :- 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Home Secretary, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, P.0. and District Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Superintendent of Police, District Durg (C.G.) '^ ^^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA __.___----rrvi-^-- <\ HLGHCOURTQFCHHArriSa^HATBI^^^^ WRITPETITIQNICL No. 6348 of2010 PETmQNER : PraveenKumarPathak.&Others. VER8U8 RESPONDENTS : StateofChhattisgarh&Another. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agmhotri, J. Present: Sto Manish Upadhyay, Advocate for the petitioner. Sliri N.N.Roy, Panel La^yer for the State/respondents. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 29th day of Octobsr, 2010) 1. Leamed counsel appearmg for the petitiosiers, on mstmctions, seeks pemiission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to appropriate fomm, that may be available to the petitioners, under fhe provisions oflaw, 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side has 110 objection, 3. It is ordered accordmgly. 4. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdi'awn with fhe aforestated liberty, ifso advised. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit