IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1025 of 2002 (M/S) Ajit Singh ……… Petitioner Versus The Commissioner, Garhwal Mandal, and others ……… Respondents ……… Mr. B.S. Thind, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Seema Sirohi, Advocate for respondent no. 2 Hon’ble V. K. Gupta, C. J. After hearing detailed arguments of the learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the impugned order dated 31.08.2002 passed by respondent no. 1, I am convinced that respondent no. 1, while referring to the judgment passed by the supreme Court, rightly exercised his review jurisdiction and upon reviewing the order dated 29.06.2002 rightly reconsidered the matter and directed that the appeal filed be taken up for fresh hearing by fixing a date in the matter. Admittedly, the petitioner was not a party in the appeal, which was dismissed on 29.06.2002 and in which the aforesaid review order was passed. No interference is called for or warranted. The petition is dismissed. (V.K. Gupta, C.L.) 07.08.2008 A