HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.18032 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.09.2011 **** Sikander Pal Singh . . . . Petitioners VS. State of Punjab & Anr. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** Present: Mr. Surinder Garg, Advocate for the petitioner ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioners assert their entitlement for Physical Training Inspectors (PTIs) on the basis of the revised merit list prepared after a Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in Manjit Singh v. State of Punjab & Anr. (CWP No.451 of 2008) decided on 05.02.2010 (2). Earlier the petitioners were treated ineligible despite possessing higher qualifications for the advertised post of PTI. They are said to have represented the authorities in this regard on 20.09.2010 (Annexure P14) but no action thereupon has been taken so far. (3). Since the assertion made by the petitioners requires factual verification, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners as contained in the representation (Annexure P14) and dispose of the same in the light of the decision of the Full Bench in Manjit Singh’s case (supra) by passing a speaking order within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. CWP No.18032 of 2011.doc - 2 – (4). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 23.09.2011 vishal shonkar (SURYA KANT) Judge 2