IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-30985 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: October 17, 2011 Ashok Kumar & another .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. S.K. Bawa, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Deepak Sabharwal, Advocate, for respondent Nos.4 to 6. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with the plea that they being of marriageable age, got married. Respondent Nos.4 to 6, however, are not accepting the marriage and therefore, they have been threatening the life and liberty of the petitioners. Crl. Misc. No. M-30985 of 2011 [2] 2. On 13.10.2011 when the case was taken up, parties were allowed to meet. 3. Petitioner No.2 states that she wants to accompany her husband, petitioner No.1, Ashok Kumar. 4. Learned counsel for the private respondents, on instructions from respondent Nos.4 and 5 (present in Court), contends that the respondents have accepted the marriage of the petitioners and assured the Court that they shall not take law into their own hands, and shall not cause harm to the petitioners. 5. In view of the statement made on behalf of the respondents, the petition is disposed of. (AJAI LAMBA) October 17, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?