IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19462 of 2011 Deepak Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 30.06.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 135 and 136 of the Electricity Act. The accusation is of committing theft of electricity. The loss has been calculated to the tune of Rs.51696/-. Though there was dues from before of Rs.14547/-. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that bonafide consumer is father of petitioner. It is further submitted that joint family property and part of property is in possession of petitioner. The total loss calculated to the tune of Rs.66243/-. The petitioner is ready to deposit Rs. 35,000/- before the learned court below within a period of six months which will be invested in some fixed deposit schemes which will be result of the case. Considering the aforesaid facts, let 2 the petitioner, above named, be released on provisional anticipatory bail for six months in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 69 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M. Patna City, Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The provisional bail of the petitioner shall be confirmed by the learned court below on deposit of the aforesaid amount. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)