e^t- Singto Bench IN THE HON'BLE HI6H COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITCON ( S ) N0.3€>6<BOF 2011 PETTTCONER Rajendra Kumar Kashyap S/o. Late Shri Ram Prasad Kashyap, aged about 46 Years, ...?'y^ Occupation - Ex- Service men, Residence of '^n^^v ..•- c^°- Manisay Rajak, Fundurdihari, Beechpara ^'^^'.^^^^- Ambikapur,, Distt.- Sarguja (C.G.) ...•••"' '•i^y' '*' . ..•••'' L/ ' , -0~ A® VERSUS RESPQNDENTS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary . Urban Administration and Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. 'nieConunissionercutt Oirector Directorate of Urban Admiriistt'ation and Development Department Chhattisgarh Raipur CC.6.) 3. Deputy Director pension. Nqgriya Prashashan and Development Bilaspur, bistt.- Bilaspur ( C.G.} ^~ 4. AAunicipal Council Chirmiri, through its Chief Municipal Officer Chirmiri, t>istt.- Koriya ( C.6.) WRIT PETCTION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INOIA FOR ISSUEANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT. [ I "'l . A "'w^ ^^ ^^ -fl HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. (Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Dhwaher) Writ Petitfa»nfSl No. 3968 <rf 2011 PETiTIONER Rajendra Kumar Kashyap VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Ghhattlsgarh and others Shri SunN Sahu, counsel for the petltioner. Shri Pravin Das, Dy. G.A. for the State. WRTT PETITXON UNDER ARTICUE 226 OF THE CONSTrrUTION OF IND2A O R D ER (25.07.2011) With the consent of the leamed c©unsetfor the parttes, the matter is heard flnally. Grievance of the petttloner is that though tw has compteted 23 years of ser</{ce but the respondents are wrongly calculatlng his sen/ice period as 9 years, The present case pertains to the non-payment of retlral ctues in particular the pension. Counsel for the State submits that the State Government has already constituted a High Power Retiral Dues Committee and the said Commlttee is duly empowa-ed to consider the cases llke that of the petitioner. Let the petltioner file a representatton to the said Committee or to make a request to the ofFlcer of the Advocate Generat along with copy of e wrlt petition fbr forwardlng the same to the Committee. Let thls t?e done within a period of 15 days from the date of recsipt of copy of thls order. On thls belng done, the Committee shalt issue notice to the petittoner and officers concemed within a further period r 's of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and j»ssorder in accordance wlth law after affordlng due oppwtunity of hearing to the petitfoner. The petitioner and the offlcers concerned may file additional doeuments/ if neeessary. The entire exercise includtng payment of retiral dues^ if any, to the petitioner, be completed within a period of three montis from the date of recelpt of copy of this order. Wfth the above observations, thls petition 1s dtsposed of. __ Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge tB'B