IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL No.232 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 22.02.2008 in W.P.No.27345 of 2007 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1. M/s. S.V.C. Estates Private Limited, a Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 having its Office at 203, II Floor, MIGH 10 S.V. Plaza, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad, rep. by its Managing Director Sri.P.Upender, S/o.Sri P.Nagabhushanam R/o.9-9-23/2/1, Reddy Colony, Champapet, Hyderabad. ..... Appellant And 1. R. Dayananda Reddy, S/o. Sri Venugopal Reddy R/o H. No. 3-4-172, Lingampally, Kachiguda, Hyderabad. 2. Smt. M. Radhika, W/o. Sri M. Ram Reddy, R/o. 3-4-376/6/5, Lingampally, Kachiguda, Hyderabad. 3. Grater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep. by its Special Officer-cum-Commissioner, Head Office, Lower Tank Bund Road, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 4. The Chief City Planner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Head Office, Lower Tank Bund Road, Secretariat, Hyderabad. .....Respondents Counsel for the appellant : Sri M.V.S.Suresh Kumar Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2: Sri E.Madan Mohan Rao Counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4: Sri R. Ramachandra Reddy The Court passed the following : JUDGMENT: (per Anil R. Dave, C.J.) After arguing the matter for some time, the learned Advocate for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the appeal. Permission is granted. The appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn. Needless to say that it will be open for the learned Advocate for the appellant to argue all the points before the learned Single Judge. ANIL R. DAVE, C.J. 19th March, 2008 R. SUBHASH REDDY, J. …..REGISTRAR ARS