FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.7929 OF 2004 PETITION NO.7929 OF 2004 PETITION NO.7929 OF 2004 -------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. -------------------------------------------------------- Dr.V.K. Chouwdhari, for the Petitioner Ms. Preetam P. Tendulkar i/b. M.S. Karnik for Respondents 1 and 2. Mrs. S.S.Bhende, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.3 to 6. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & S.P. KUKDAY,JJ. : F.I. REBELLO & S.P. KUKDAY,JJ. : F.I. REBELLO & S.P. KUKDAY,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 16TH FEBRUARY, 2005 : 16TH FEBRUARY, 2005 : 16TH FEBRUARY, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. . The present petition by the petitioners was to grant continuity of service. Subsequent to the filing of the petition the services of the petitioners have been orally terminated. He preferred an Appeal to the School Tribunal. The Appeal was allowed and the order of termination is set aside. Against that the management has preferred a petition which has been admitted and stay has been granted. 2. Considering the subsequent event the issue is whether the petitioner could be reinstated namely he was appointed against a regular post will be an issue to be considered in the pending petition filed by the management. It will, therefore, be open to the petitioner to raise all pleas which might be available to him in the pending petition filed by the management against the order of reinstatement. With the above observation petition stands disposed of. (F.I. (F.I. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) (S.P. (S.P. (S.P. KUKDAY, J.) KUKDAY, J.) KUKDAY, J.)