£\ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILAsPUR w.P. (S) No. 6647 of 2007 Arun Kumar Chodhari S/o Shri Motichand Chodhari, aged about 37 years, Working as Assistant Teacher, R/o H.M. L.I.G. 25, Pandit Ravi Shankar Shukla / Nagar, Korba, Distt—Korba (C.G.) PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Versus Stats of C.G. 8n through Secretaxy, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur (CG) Commissioner, ’I‘n'bal Welfare Department, Raipur (C. G.) Assistant Commissioner, Txibal Welfare Department, Korba, Distt— Korba(C.G.) Block Education Otlicer, Korba (C.G,) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION O INDIA Appearance: Shli Amit Shanna, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sumit Verma, Panel Lawyer for the State on advance copy. SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J Heard on admission. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has passed B.T.I examination on his own expenses, therefore, he is entitled to receive two advance increments according to circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999. He also submits that in many identical matters, the petitions have been allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another {2006 (H) MPJR-CG 96}. He submits that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the said judgment. He also submits that the petitioner has acquired B.T.I. Examination Certificate on his own expenses but by mistake, it has been mentioned in the writ petition as B.Ed. Examination Certificate. ORAL ORDER (02. 1 1.2007) F 2 g@ w.P.(S) No. 6647/2007 This legal position is not disputed by the learned counsel for the Stats. However, he submits that the order may be passed in terms of the said judgment, but it shall be subjected to ven'iication regarding petitioner’s such qualification. Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra) subject to veriflcation of the facts as to whether the petitioner had acquired B.T.I. Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per circulars dated 24. 12.1998 and 01.03. 1999 and further whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. The petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/— l Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge vatti