1 THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Letters Patent Appeal No. 504/2010 in Writ Petition No. 2751/2009 (D) Samadhan Gulabrao Jadhav..vs..President/Secretary, Sahakar Maharashi Swargiya Bhaskarraoji Shingane Shikshan Krida Va Bahuuddeshiya Sanstha & ors. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Parchure, Advocate for appellant. Mr. Khubalkar, A.G.P. for respondent no.3. CORAM: S. A. BOBDE & P. D. KODE, JJ DATED : 15 th NOVEMBER, 2010 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. 2. This appeal is filed against judgment passed by learned Single Judge upholding the order of Tribunal by which the appellant has been denied relief of reinstatement on the ground that his services cannot be said to be permanent. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that it was not appropriate on the part of the learned Single Judge to deny relief to the appellant on the ground that the appropriate procedure for making appointment was not followed in the appellant's case. 3. Perusal of the judgment shows that it is not the only reason given by the learned Single Judge. Admittedly, there is no appointment order in favour of the petitioner. As a result, it is not possible to ascertain the period for 2 which the petitioner was said to have been appointed. Further, there is no proof that the petitioner has worked continuously for a period of two years in any capacity, whether on probation or otherwise. 4. In this view of the matter, we see no reason to interfere in the present Letters Patent Appeal. The appeal is, therefore, rejected. JUDGE JUDGE kahale