IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1030 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.11.2009 Dharam Pal Maddar ......Petitioner(s) Versus Naveen Aggarwal ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Hemant Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Puneet Jindal, Advocate for the respondent. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) CM No.26291-CII of 2009 CM is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Reply filed on behalf of the respondent is taken on record. COCP No.1030 of 2009 As per the averments made in this petition, the petitioner, who is a Railway Contractor, executed the works allotted to him by the respondent-Authorities. However, the due payment was not being released to him. Vide judgment dated 5.3.2009 passed in CWP No.3500 of 2009, this Court had directed the respondent to settle the petitioner's account and further directed to release the amount whatever is found due to him within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order . The grievance of the petitioner before this Court in this petition is that the respondents have not complied with the aforesaid directions of this Court passed in CWP No.3500 of 2009. In response to the show cause notice issued by this Court, reply by way of short affidavit of the respondent has been filed wherein it has been submitted that in compliance of the directions dated 5.3.2009 COCP No.1030 of 2009 (O&M) -2- issued by this Court, a speaking order (attached as Annexure R-1) has been passed settling the account of the petitioner and in pursuance thereto, a sum of Rs.1,47,943/- has been released to the petitioner which has been received by him. In view of the aforesaid stand taken by the respondent, I am not inclined to proceed further in this petition. Rule discharged. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek any other remedy to challenge the order Annexure R-1 in accordance with law. November 10, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE