IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15916 of 2009 SALIM ANSARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 12.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that though the petitioner is husband, having allegation of demand of dowry and torture for its non-fulfillment but reality is that the complainant herself left the matrimonial house just after a year and never came back even after all the efforts made by petitioner, so he filed a restitution on 28.4.2006 in which the complainant appeared on 27.2.2007. Thereafter she filed this complaint petition after months after her appearance making several allegations. In her written statement of the matrimonial case she has clearly mentioned about her remaining for eight months only. Marriage is of the year 2003. If she remained for eight months in the matrimonial house then how it is possible to oust her on 20.12.2006 as alleged in the complaint petition. Discussed suggested contradictions and submissions entitles the - 2 - petitioner for anticipatory bail. Prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub- divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram, District Rohtas, in Complaint Case No. 945© of 2007, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI