IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.2240 of 2008 Date of decision:11.01.2010. Mahinder Singh ...Petitioner Versus Divisional Canal Officer and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Gaurav Mohunta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Neena Madan, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Sandeep Singh Ghangas, Advocate, for respondent No.6. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has no objection if the impugned order dated 05.09.2005 Annexure P-7 passed by the Canal authorities is implemented without the authorities insisting upon the disbursement of the compensation amount of Rs.20,162/- which had been awarded to the petitioner by the Canal authorities. Learned State counsel and also the learned counsel for the private respondent No.6 states that they have no objection to the grant of the request made by the petitioner. In the light thereof, this revision petition is disposed of with a direction that the Canal authorities shall be entitled to implement the order dated 05.09.2005 Annexure P-7 passed by the respondent No.1 – Divisional Canal Officer, Safidon but the Canal authorities shall not insist upon the disbursement of the compensation amount of Rs.20,162/- to the petitioner. Disposed of accordingly. January 11, 2010 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE