Q‘ web” IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR_(C.G.) WRIT PETITION (S) No. (a 5‘ EE OF 2010 (D $EN¥3M§ ‘E§N€H ’ PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS 1. r/Jaiprakash Choubey Son of Late Shri Chhatradhari Choubey, aged about 51 years, Working as a 1. x, Ramesh Kumar Dubey Son of Shri Sudama Prasad Dubey, aged about 46 years, Working as a Constable, Excise Department, State of Chhattisgarh, through: the Excise Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). Secretary Omar” Constable, Excise Department, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS The Commissioner, Excise Department, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). The Collector (Excise), Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.)i The District Excise Officer, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). 'y/ @ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTI LE 226 OF THE CONSTIT TION OF INDIA n‘ ‘ mmm wmm mm wW #Wm’ T QE PW DIWAKER 'mm Wt 2oo Miam (W) mmm SB ;, HON'BLE MR. JUS £€X37§l233i 'Shri V. K. Pandey, c unsel far the petitioners. Shri Pravin Das, DyJ A. for the State. Grievance of the pet ticners is that their seniority ought to have been koned frcm their initial appointment Le. 1982 w en they were appointed as salesman whereas they h ve been given seniority frem .e. 1992 when they were the date of absorption appointed as Constable. Learned State Cou sel submits that let the presentation to respondent No.2 who in turn shaii de ide the same in accordance with law. To this proposit n, counsel for the petitioner shows his agreement a d wants to withdraw this petition. He, however, eeks a direction from this Court for early’disposal o the representation made”by\\w \the petitioner. Accordingly, the etition is dismissed as withdrawn. In the event Iity of filing a fresh detailed representation by the pe itioner, the same would be decided by the concerned authority in accordance with law as expeditiously as po sibie. petitioner make a fresh aim aim gamma, omm'ameivwi 4e~2/2oi 1—-i .so,ooo. . c It is made ciear that this court has not expressed of the case and the authority any opinion on the merits concerned wouid be ’t liberty to decide the representation strictly in accordance with law after due scrutiny of the facts. Pritinker Diwaker 'i Judge Sd/— mam dam: gamma. nmimamlisIHo—z/zm 1—1 ,5o,ooo. WmwiwW m zoo amm (W) Mmm mmm mm anew WW win-5E d fséi mm a; amm