THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No :26460 of 2007 DATED:17-01-2008 BETWEEN: Kannapuram Nataraj & 4 others. ..... PETITIONERS AND The District Collector, Karimnagar & 3 others. .....RESPONDENTS ORDER: Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 2. Petitioners seek a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in raising constructions in the petitioners’ lands admeasuring Ac.1.20 guntas in Sy.No.172 of Rekurthi village, Karimnagar mandal and District, as illegal, and arbitrary. 3. It is the case of the petitioners that as against the resumption orders passed by the 3rd respondent-Tahsildar, Karimnagar, dated 31-08-2007, in proceedings No.B/401/07/38 petitioners filed W.P.No.20740 of 2007 which was disposed of by this Court on 01-10-2007 directing the petitioners to file an appeal before the 2nd respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer and pending disposal of the appeal, status quo is directed to be maintained and in the appeal filed by the petitioner, the 2nd respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer, Karimnagar also granted order of status quo in appeal No.L/5499/07, dated 10-10-2007, and the said appeal is still pending. It is stated that pending disposal of the appeal, the 3rd respondent entered into the land and made certain constructions with the help of the police personnel. Hence, the present Writ Petition. 4. I am of the opinion that if there is any violation of the orders passed by this Court by the appellate authority it is always open for the petitioners to initiate Contempt proceedings against the concerned respondents. This Court also directed to maintain status quo pending disposal of the appeal and therefore, if there is any violation of the orders of this Court in W.P.No.20740 of 2007 it is open for the petitioners to get the said order implemented by way of filing a Contempt Case. 5. Accordingly, Writ Petition is dismissed with a liberty to the petitioners to file a Contempt Case, if any constructions have been made by the respondents 3 and 4 in the said land. _________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J 17th January, 2008. Tsy