IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30518 of 2009 SANJAY RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner, who is in custody since 26.2.2009, seeks bail in a Police case under Sections 395 and other provisions of the Penal Code. It is submitted that the F.I.R. is against unknown. Co- accused, whose name similarly transpired during investigation have been granted bail on 1.4.2009 in Cr. Misc. No. 51424 of 2008 and analogous cases. The impugned order of rejection notices the submission of grant of bail of co-accused with common allegations, but states that “I have perused the case record including case diary, Witnesses in para 20, 22, 28, 32 of the case diary have stated the name of this petitioner for his alleged involvement in this case.” There is no discussion with regard to the nature of the involvement distinguishing his case from the co- accused grated bail by this Court. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, abovenamed be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Siwan in Basantpur P.S. case No. 116 of 2006. 2 Let this order be placed before the Presiding Officer, who has passed the impugned order. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)