HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 2470 of 2007 APPLICANTS NON- APPLICANTS Tikaram Yadav, aged about 37 years, son of Shri Nathuram Yadav, resident of Pandariya, district Bilaspur (MP) (now CG). Govind Prasad Sac, aged about 37 years, son of Shri Dallu Sao, resident of Tikripara Takhatpur District Bilaspur (MP). Narayan Prasad Pali, aged about 32 years, son of Shri Vishal Prasad Pali, resident of Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (MP). Chittaram Pali, aged about 37 years, son of Shri Bhagwani Ram Pali, resident of Village Patharia,Tahsil Mungeli, district Bilaspur. VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh through Principal Secretary Panchayat and Rural Development Department, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (MP). Development Commissioner, Bhopal. 2. 3. Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur. order dated 27.02.2007 passed by this Court in W.P. (S) No. 1861 of 2005 (Ram Dulare Prajapati & others Vs. State ofMadhyaMayi :1. > , (SB: Hon'hle Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present : Shri Indrasen Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner. Shn' U.N.S. Deo, Govt. Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER r (Passedmh, 2008) The applicants impugi the order dated 06.03.1998 (Annexure A/24) passed by the Commissioner, Bilaspur (CG) (Non applicant No. 3), whereunder grant of regular pay scale to the applicants have been withdrawn. ' 2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that the cases of the applicants are squarely covered by the decision ofthis Court passed on 27.02.2007 in Writ Petition (S) No. 1861 of 2005 diam Dulare Prajapati & others Vs. State ofMadhya Pradesh and others) and other connected matters. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants thither submits that he has already submitted a representation along with copy of the judgment and athers) (Supra) and other connected matters, befure the authority concerned but till date his representation has not been decided. The judgment was not in personam but in rem, thus, the same would he applicable to all the similarly situated candidates in the light of the judgnent and order dated 27.02.2007 passed by this Court in WIP. (S) No. 1861 of 2005 (Ram Dulare Prafapati & others Vs‘ State ofMadigza Pradesh and others)(supra) and other connected matters. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State submits that the representation pending before the appellate authority may be disposed of within the stipulated time. Accordingly, it is directed that the concerned authority shall take steps to decide the representation ofthe applicants in the light ofthe above stated cases, on its own merit, in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a- copy of this order. No order asto costs. O Sd/- S.K. Agnihotri Judge (?