1 CA-3602.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3602 OF 2010 Mahammad Jamal Nadaf & Anr. .... Applicants Vs. State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Shri Amit Sale for the Applicants. Ms S.D. Shinde, APP, for the State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: SEPTEMBER 08, 2010 P.C: 1. The two applicants who indulged in an assault on the victim with knives seek enlargement on bail. Applicant No.1 Mahammad Nadaf was named in the FIR and also by the victim himself. The victim also identified both the applicants in a test identification parade held. Considering the nature of the assault, as can be seen from the injury certificate which discloses that there were as many as four stab wounds, two of which were observed by the doctor to be grievous, the applicants are not entitled to bail. 2 CA-3602.10 2. The contention of the learned counsel for the applicants that two of the co-accused who have been identified have been released on bail, makes no difference since applicant No.2 has been identified as the assailant who inflicted the injuries on the victim with a sharp weapon. 3. The application is rejected. 4. The learned trial Judge would expedite the hearing of the case. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)