COCP No.743 of 2011 (O & M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.743 of 2011 (O & M) Date of decision: 05.12.2011 Bharat Lal .... Petitioner Versus Jaipal Singh and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr.Amarjit Markan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.H.S. Tuli, Advocate, for respondents No.2 & 3. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.: (Oral) In the present contempt petition, the grievance of the petitioner is that order dated 30th March, 1993 passed by this Court in CWP No.2949 of 1993 whereby it was directed that status quo in respect of possession be maintained, has been violated. 2. It has been stated in the petition that the respondents in violation of the aforesaid order are raising constructions by constructing upon the disputed land measuring 2 Kanals 3 Marlas comprised in Khasra No.185//25 situated at Samana. The petitioner has appended the photographs in support of his assertions. 3. It was pointed out that respondent No.1-Jaipal Singh has since died and his name was ordered to be deleted vide order dated 14.09.2011 passed by this Court. COCP No.743 of 2011 (O & M) ::2:: 4. Upon notice having been issued to the respondents, separate replies have been filed on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3. 5. In the reply filed on behalf of respondent No.2, it has been stated that respondent No.2 is neither in possession nor looking after the suit property and he had executed a conditional agreement to sell dated 28th April, 2000 along with his brothers, which is the subject- matter of civil writ petition. It has further been stated that he has not raised any boundary wall as alleged by the petitioner. 6. In the separate reply filed on behalf of respondent No.3- Gurdial Singh, it has been stated that he is in possession of the suit property in terms of the conditional agreement to sell dated 28th April, 2000. It has, however, been denied that he has raised a boundary wall as alleged. It has also been stated that some construction has been raised by an unauthorized person namely Balbir Singh Dhanoa, resident of Danipur and the same was raised on the area purchased by them from Kishan Chand, Dev Raj and Sham Lal regarding which a DDR No.10 dated 04.12.1997 was got registered at Police Station Samana. It has however been stated that respondent No.3 is 86 years old and is suffering from old-age ailments and cannot even think of violating the Court orders. 7. In view of the above replies, no further action is called for in the present contempt petition. Same stands disposed of accordingly. 8. Rule discharged. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE December 05, 2011 sukhpreet COCP No.743 of 2011 (O & M) ::3::