IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP NO.13605 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: August 29,2006 Raj Kumar ….Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and another …..Respondents CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.BHALLA PRESENT: Shri D.N.Tanwar, Advocate for the petitioner. Viney Mittal,J.(Oral). The petitioner has challenged the order Annexure P.1 whereby he has been ordered to be suspended. The grievance made by the petitioner is that although the order of suspension was passed on May 8,2006 but no charge sheet has been served upon the petitioner so far. In this view of the matter, without going any further into the merits of the claim of the petitioner, we dispose of the present petition with a direction to the respondents to take further proceedings against the petitioner, if so required, in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is received. A copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges. (Viney Mittal) Judge August 29,2006 (H.S. Bhalla) KD Judge