THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4576 OF 2009 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order, dated 17.09.2009, in I.A.No.97 of 2009 in O.S.No.87 of 2009 on the file of the Sub-divisional Magistrate (Mobile Court), Bhadrachalam, whereunder and whereby, temporary injunction was granted restraining the petitioners/defendants or any body on their behalf from transferring the licences of the Tobacco Barons on the purchasers, till further orders and posted the suit as well as the I.A. to 01.10.2009 for appearance of the petitioners herein. 2. Heard both sides. 3. Respondent herein filed the suit for declaration that the licence holders of the Tobacco Barons registered under the Tobacco Board Act, 1975, are not entitled to sell the Licences; that she is entitled for restoration of her licence for the Tobacco Barons bearing Nos.09-036- 066 & 09-036-002 and to restrain the petitioners herein or anybody on their behalf from transferring the licences on the purchasers. In the said suit, the present petition is filed for grant of temporary injunction restraining the petitioners herein from transferring the licences of the Tobacco Barns, pending disposal of the suit, wherein the impugned order was passed. 4. Before passing the ex parte order, granting temporary injunction, the learned Magistrate should have applied his mind as to the prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury if injunction is not granted. Those aspects have not been considered at all. Right to reason is an indispensable part of a sound judicial system, whereunder the other party should know for what reason the case went against him. Such reasons are lacking in the impugned order. Therefore, the impugned order is liable to be set aside. 5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed setting aside the impugned order, dated 17.09.2009, in I.A.No.97 of 2009 in O.S.No.87 of 2009 on the file of the Sub-divisional Magistrate (Mobile Court), Bhadrachalam, and remitting the matter to the trial Court to pass appropriate reasoned order in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after giving opportunity to both the parties. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ K.C. BHANU, J January 24, 2011 MD IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4576 OF 2009 Between: The Tobacco Board and another .....PETITIONERS AND Smt. Muppalla Aruna ....RESPONDENT The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4576 OF 2009 January 24, 2011