IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN THURSDAY, THE 27TH MARCH 2008 / 7TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 28952 of 2005(S) -------------------------------------- OA.357/2004 CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,ERNAKULAM BENCH ................................................ PETITIONER: ------------------ 1. THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 2. THE PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, O/O ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A & E), KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF PERSONEL,PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSION DEPARTMENT OF PENSION AND PENSIONERS WELFARE, NEW DELHI. BY ADV. SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASST.SOLICITOR RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. R.GOPINATHAN, S/O.R.RAGHAVAN PILLAI, `SHREYUS' 59-KRISHNA VIHAR, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, UNION BANK OF INDIA, PANAMPILLY NAGAR BRANCH, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 036. R2 BY ADV. SRI.A.V.THOMAS SRI.MATHEW B. KURIAN SRI.K.T.THOMAS SRI.V.M.KURIAN R1 BY ADV. SRI.R.MURALIDHARAN (AROOR) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO: 28952/2005 S APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1. COPY OF THE O.A NO. 357/2004 OF THE CAT, ERNAKULAM DT. 5/4/2004. EXT.P2. COPY OF THE REPLY STATEMENT FILED BY THE PETITIONERS HEREIN IN OA NO. 357/2004 DT. 1/2/2005. EXT.P3. COPY OF THE ORDER DT. 6/7/2005 IN OA NO. 357/2004 OF THE CAT, ERNAKULAM. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL. True copy tga K.Balakrishnan Nair & P.N.Ravindran, JJ. ======================== W.P(C).No.28952 of 2005 ======================== Dated this the 27th day of March, 2008. JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair,J. The petitioners are the respondents in O.A.No.357 of 2004. The said O.A. was disposed of by Ext.P3 judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal dated 6.7.2005. The point raised by the petitioners is covered against them by the decision of this Court in O.P.No.17380 of 2002. This writ petition was admitted because the petitioners pointed out that S.L.P. 21320 of 2003 filed against the judgment in that original petition was pending before the Apex Court. Now, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the said S.L.P. has already been dismissed. In view of the above position, this writ petition is also dismissed. K.Balakrishnan Nair, Judge. P.N.Ravindran, Judge. ess 31/3