IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DECEMBER 2009 / 2ND POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 37283 of 2009(E) PETITIONER(S): K.G.AJAYAKUMAR, KANJIRAVILAYIL HOUSE, EDAKKADU P.O., KODAMBANAD, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.V.G.ARUN SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR RESPONDENT(S) : 1. THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION COMMISSION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, SASTHAMCOTTA, KOLLAM. 3. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES/ELECTORAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, SASTHAMCOTTA, KOLLAM. 4. RETURNING OFFICER/CO-OPERATIVE INSPECTOR OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, SASTHAMCOTTA, KOLLAM. 5. THE ADMINISTRATOR/ASST.REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, SASTHAMCOTTA PCARD BANK LTD.NO.Q 373, SASTHAMCOTTA P.O., KOLLAM. 6. THE SASTHAMCOTTA PCARD BANK LTD.NO.Q 373 SASTHAMCOTTA (PO), KOLLAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 7. RANI.R.KURUP, KUZHIYIL PUTHENVEEDU, MANAKKARA, SASTHAMCOTTA, KOLLAM-690521. 9. E.S. VASUDEVAN NAIR, S/O. SANKARAN NAIR, AGED 70 YEARS, ANIL NIVAS, MUTHUPILAKKADU EAST, PORUVAZHY P.O., KOLLAM DIST. ADV. SRI. K.SIJU FOR R9 SRI.S.SUDHEESHKAR FOR R9 GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.C. SANTHOSH KUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 37283 of 2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 23rd December, 2009. J U D G M E N T This writ petition is filed by a member of the 6th respondent- bank, apprehending postponement of the election to the Director Board of the bank. According to the petitioner, it is in accordance with the directions of this Court that the election has been notified to be conducted and therefore respondents 1 to 5 cannot now postpone the election. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader and the additional respondent also. 3. By Ext. P5 order in Contempt of Court Case No. 1259/2009, this Court has directed the administrator to take necessary resolution and do the needful immediately on the production of a copy of the judgment. Pursuant to the same, the administrator has passed a resolution on 16-11-2009, pursuant to which the election has been directed to be conducted. The petitioner now submits that the election notification has also been published in the newspapers today. That being so, I do not see any reason why the election should be postponed further. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of directing that respondents 1 to 6 shall take all steps to conduct the election as already notified. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.