HONOURABLE SRI JSUTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.8826 OF 2007 ORDER: The petitioner is a former councilor of Jagityal Municipality. His grievance is that the 2nd respondent has caused obstruction to a public road by putting stones and though the same was brought to the notice of the Municipality, no action has been taken thereon. 2. The 2nd respondent filed a counter – affidavit denying the allegations. According to him, the land in question is owned by himself and his father, and when there was interference by the Municipality, they filed O.S. No.35 of 1991 in the Court of Subordinate Judge, Jagityal for the relief of perpetual injunction and recovery of damages. The suit is said to have been partly decreed on 12-07-1996 granting the relief of perpetual injunction. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the 1st respondent and the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent. 4. The petitioner is under the impression that the 2nd respondent has encroached into the public road. However, it is categorically stated by the 2nd respondent that the property in question exclusively belongs to himself and his brother and a decree for perpetual injunction was granted by the Court of Subordinate Judge, Jagityal against the 1st respondent. As long as the decree operates, neither the petitioner nor the 1st respondent can proceed against the 2nd respondent. 5. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J February 17, 2011. KTL