^IJVf IN THE mGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BOASFUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0. B5^2_ QF 2011 PETITIONER : Smt. Mayawati W/o Late Mohit Rani, aged about 52 years, R/o VUlage- Chiraipani, Tahsil- Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) RESPONDENTS : X VERSUS 1. ...•••".<^"1 <^y^ ^j^x ^fSf^ f:-y^''' .••''' ^* V'' €^fy ..^^ y State of Chhattisgarh, fhrough Secretary, Department of Revenue, Mantralay, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipiu-, District- Raipur, (C.G.). CoUector, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 3. 4. Executive Engmeer, Kelo F>roject Sarveshan Division Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) Sub. Divisional Ofiicer/ Land Acquisition OfEicer, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). WMT PETITION UUNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CCTMSTITUTION OF mDIA. ..: -"^-^ 7'i'x?-^^^, ^ ''SSS^h 1 ^ K IK ^-^^^ '-as;,,,;..- ,0'' NDENT H!GH COURT OF CHKATTISGARH : BiLASPUR WRQ' PEIiTiON iC) N0. OF 201 1 Smt. iVIavawat' v'ersus Stste of Chhattisgarh & Others © (writ Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of tndia) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Sat'sh K. Aanihotri, J. Shri Sunii Sahu, Advocate for She petitioner. Shri V.V.S.Murthv, Dy. Advocate General for the State. QRDER passed c-n this 19"' day of September, 2011) 1) Chsllenae In thls pstitlon Is io the order dated 27.08.2009 (Annexure P-1). oassed bv the Sub Divisionsi Officer (RsvenueV Land Acauisition Officer. Raigarh in Land Acquisition Case No.21/A-82/OS-07, vsilaae ChiraiDani, Tahsii & District Raiaarh iC.G.). 2) ' Accorcsing to iearned counsei appearing for the petitioner, the petltioner is owner as wei! as ho'lder of ihe iand bearing Khasra No.177, 214 Rakba 0.016 and 0.206 Hectare. tota! area 0.222 Hectare iand in villaae . Cniraipani, Tahsii & District Raigarh. Bhumi Swami right has been conferred on the petitioner on the above-stated service iand. Shri Sahu, furthsr submits that the iand has been acquired by the State Govemment for the purpose of Keio Project and the award was passed on 27.08.2009 in respect oftheiand owned bythe petitioner. No compensation wasfixed on the ground that necessary instructions wsre sought from the State Government, buttiii date nothina has haooensd. Shri Sahu, further submits that identicai issue came up before this Court in . -^imiiariv situated matters. This Court bv order dated 01.07.2011, passed ;n W.P,(C) No.3439/2011 (Phoo! Chand Ganda v. of Chhattisgarh & Others'i directed as under: "'in view of foreaoina, this pet on is dssRosed of in terms of the order passed in W.P.(C) ftf0.5239/2008, The respondents are accoiVingly, dirscted to consider the clairn of sfte petstianer for aliotment of asternate land in of compensation as the Isnd in dispute has become a past of the award which vested 'n the State Govemment st is further directed to do fhe neeafu! wsthin a cerioo' of six months fmm the date of receipt of a copy of ih'ss order. ?fi the event grievance of the petitioner still suwjves, it is open te t'ne petsiioner to revive ihe ciaim for further relief'. Shri Murthy, iearnsd Dy. Advocate General appearlng for the State respondents subrnits thst the issue with regard to grant of compensation or alternative !and is aiready pendlng consideration before the State Govemment, the same sha'l be considered and decided, as expeditiousiy as oossiDie. !n visw of Torsgoing, the writ pstition stands disposed or, in the terms of the order passed in Phoot Chand Ganda (suDra). __-—--T Sd/- . .,, SatishK.^"1 jud&e