CRR NO. 1596 OF 2011(O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR NO. 1596 OF 2011(O&M) DECIDED ON : 03.10.2011 Taranjit Singh @ Tarun Kumar @ Tarun Jindal ...Petitioner versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI Present : Mr. H. S. Mann, Advocate and Mr. G. S. Mann, Advocate and Mr. K. S. Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Moudgil, DAG, Punjab. K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL) This is a revision petition against the order dated 15.07.2011 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, vide which the revisionist has been summoned under Sections 307/326/324/34 IPC and has been ordered to face trial along with the other co-accused. The only grievance ventilated by learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has been declared juvenile vide order dated 21.01.2004 passed by CJM, Ludhiana. The prayer made in the present revision petition is that the petitioner should be tried by the Juvenile Justice Board and not by regular Court. CRR NO. 1596 OF 2011(O&M) -2- Learned State counsel could not dispute the fact that the petitioner is to be tried by the Juvenile Justice Board. So, in these circumstances, the order of summoning stands maintained and the petitioner is ordered to be tried by the Juvenile Justice Board. The prosecution may file separate report before the said Board. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. OCTOBER 03, 2011 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE