1 C.P.360.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 360 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4085 OF 2011 [Pradum Vinayak Mahske and others Vs.Vijay Singhal and others] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr.S.G.Dodya,Advocate for petitioner. Mr.K.J.Gute Patil,AGP for respondents ... CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 21ST SEPTEMBER, 2011 PER COURT : . Heard learned counsel appearing for petitioners and learned AGP appearing for respondent NO.2. 2. Respondent NO.2 tendered affidavit-in reply. Since unconditional apology is tendered by respondent NO.2 in para No.2, in my opinion, nothing further survives for consideration in this Contempt Petition. 2 C.P.360.11 It is admitted position that the claim of the petitioners is decided and cheque of the amount is disbursed on 20.09.2011. Learned counsel appearing for petitioners submits that the amount is received under protest and they have some grievance about the said amount. It is needless to clarify that if petitioners are grievance by the decision of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 they can file appropriate proceedings before appropriate Forum as permissible under law. However, nothing further survives for consideration in this Contempt Petition. The Contempt Petition stands dismissed. Notice stands discharged. Sd/- [S.S. SHINDE, J.] MTK