IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.54173 of 2007 ASHA DEVI Wife of Sri Binodanand Sharma Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 9/ 11.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. In the instant application, the petitioner prays for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to opposite party no.2 vide order dated 04.07.2007 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 24056 of 2007. Learned counsel submits that on wrong plea the opposite party no.2 has been granted anticipatory bail. It is further submitted that no compromise was arrived at between the parties after institution of the instant case being Complaint Case no. 953 C of 2006 under Sections 323, 379, 494 and 498 A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner, who is the complainant, states that compromise was arrived at between the parties in the year, 2005 whereas the instant case has been filed in the year, 2006. It appears that a Panchnama was entered into, in the year, 2005, prior to the institution of the Complaint case and not after institution of this case. However, as the petitioner has remained on anticipatory bail for two years, I am not inclined to cancel the same. Nonetheless, I direct that the opposite party no.2, Munni Devi, would not physically absent herself for two consecutive dates at a stretch, till four witnesses are examined or trial is concluded, whichever is earlier. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)