WP(C) 1656/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B P KATAKEY Heard Mr RC Das, learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the lear ned Standing Counsel for the respondent Assam State Transport Corporation. None appears for respondent no.2, despite service. The petitioner has challenged in this writ petition the agreement dated 1st February 2010, executed between the respondent no.1 and respondent no.2, whe re by and where under, a tenancy agreement for a period of 1(one) year, effectiv e from 1st February 2010, was executed. Since the period of such agreement is over, the writ petition has became infructuous. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.