Crl Misc No. M 2903 of 2009 (O&M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : December 16, 2009 1. Crl Misc No. M 2903 of 2009 (O&M) Bhattu Giri and others vs State of Punjab and another, 2. Crl Misc No. M 22091 of 2009 (O&M) Preet Mohinder and another vs State of Punjab and another. *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Vikas Gupta, Advocate for Mr.A.S.Kalra, Advocate for the petitioners in Crl. Misc N.M 2903 of 2009 Mr. Karanvir Singh, Advocate for the petitioners in Crl Misc No. M 22091 of 2009 Mr. Mehar Deep Singh, DAG Punjab for respondent No.1. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) This order shall dispose of Crl. Misc Nos. M 2903 and 22091 of 2009, as the same have arisen from cross cases between the parties. Crl. Misc No. M 2903 of 2009 has arisen out of Rapat No.36, dated 27.8.2008, lodged under Sections 326/324/34 of the IPC in FIR No.147, dated 27.8.2008, registered under Sections 452/323/148/149 of the IPC, at Police Station Kot Ise Khan, District Moga, while Crl. Misc No. M 22091 of 2009 has arisen from FIR No.147, dated 27.8.2008, registered Crl Misc No. M 2903 of 2009 (O&M) ::2:: under Sections 452/323/148/149 of the IPC, at Police Station Kot Ise Khan, District Moga. Counsel for the parties have stated that the matter has now been compromised between the parties and a copy of the compromise deed is Annexure P-3 in Crl Misc No. M 2903 of 2009. Petitioners-Preet Mohinder Singh and Resham Singh, identified by their counsel Shri Karanvir Singh, Advocate are present in Court on one side, and petitioners Bhattu Giri, Sonu Giri and Jhilla Giri, identified by their counsel Shri Vikas Gupta, Advocate, are present on the other side. They all have confirmed about the compromise (Annexure P-3) effected between them. Counsel for the State of Punjab, on instructions from HC Amarjit Singh, has also confirmed the factum of compromise arrived at between the parties. Consequently, in view of the fact that the allegations are not very serious, and in view of the decision of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others vs State of Punjab, 2007(3) RCR (Crl) 1052, this compromise is accepted, the present petition are allowed and Rapat No.36, dated 27.8.2008, lodged under Sections 326/324/34 of the IPC in FIR No.147, dated 27.8.2008, registered under Sections 452/323/148/149 of the IPC, at Police Station Kot Ise Khan, District Moga, and FIR No.147, dated 27.8.2008, registered under Sections 452/323/148/149 of the IPC, at Police Station Kot Ise Khan, District Moga, as also subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. This would, however, be subject to payment of Rs.20,000/- as costs in each case to be deposited with the State Legal Services Authority Punjab by the respective complainant. Let the complainants produce the receipt of the costs before the trial Court on the Crl Misc No. M 2903 of 2009 (O&M) ::3:: date fixed. As the main petitions have since been allowed, all the pending civil miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. Copy of this order be given dasti to counsel for the parties on payment of usual charges. ( AJAY TEWARI ) December 16, 2009. JUDGE `kk'