IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. 3711 of 2011-D. Decided on: 29th November, 2011. ____________________________________________________ Pradeep Kumar. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 NO. ____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate. For the respondents NO.1 to 4. : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. None for respondent No. 5. ------------------------------------------------------ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present lis is covered by the judgment dated 20th October, 2011, rendered by this Court in C.W.P. No. 7667 of 2011 and other connected matters. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make a representation to respondent No. 2 within a period of two weeks from today. Thereafter, the same shall be decided by the respondent NO. 2 strictly as per the principles laid down in the judgment cited hereinabove, within a further period of four weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - this judgment by the petitioner. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge November 29, 2011. (bhupender) - 3 - `