IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1877 OF 2009 Between : Gandra Aruna and others. .... PETITIONERS A N D Dr.P.Vijayapal Reddy and others. …RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 1877 OF 2009 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order, dated 11.07.2008, in I.A.No.41 of 2007 in O.S.No.250 of 2002 on the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Warangal, whereunder and whereby, the application filed under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to order for separate trial in O.S.No.250 of 2002 and O.S.No.867 of 2001, which were clubbed for joint trial, was dismissed. 2. Heard both sides. 3. As seen from the record, as per the orders of the District Judge, Warangal, dated 05.04.2005 in Transfer O.P.No.295 of 2005, filed by the respondent therein, O.S.No.250 of 2002 was withdrawn from the file of III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Warangal and transferred to the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Warangal, to try along with O.S.No.867 of 2001, as the cause of action in both the suits is one and the same. 4. When it is clearly held that in both the matters the cause of action is one and the same and the evidence to be adduced is same and the counsel for the petitioner also gave no objection at the time of clubbing both the suits, filing the present I.A. for separate trial does not arise. Therefore, the impugned does not suffer from any infirmities. The Revision is devoid of merit and liable to be dismissed. 5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed, leaving open all the remedies available to the petitioners under law. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ K.C.BHANU. J OCTOBER 26, 2010. YVL