SB'ieBBHWWBWUtiilUMJUWl HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR WritPetitioa (S] fio. 4840 of 2007 PETITIONER A.R. Tirkey, S/o.- Sbri L. Tirkey, Aged about 33 years, Presently working as Accounts Officer, Project Iinpleinentation Unit No. 1, Pradhaii Mauta-i Sadak Yajaaa, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G) Versus RESPONDENTS 1 State of CUiatdsgarh, Through- Secretaiy, Govemment of Chhattisgarh, Department of Fiaaiice, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Maatralaya, Raipur (Chhatdsgarh) 2 The Secretary, Goverrunent of Chliattisgarh, Departnient of Panchayat & Rural Developinent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chliattisgarb). 3 The Chief Executive Officer, Cbliattisgarh Rural Road Development Abhikaraa, Civil Lines, Raipiir (C.G.) 4 Director, Treasuiy, Account and Pension, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhatdsgarh. Writ Petitioa under Article226 ofthe Constitutioa pOndla Appearauce: Shri Paukaj Shrivastava, counsel for fhe petitioner. Ms. Deepali Paudey, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORAL ORDER (20.08.2007) SUNIL KUMAR 8INHA. J, Heaid on admission. Learaed counsel for the petitioner subinits that the petitioner, who was working as aa Assistant Account Officer iu. the OfGce of Divisional Joint Director, Treasury Account & Pension, Bilaspur, has been transferred as Accouat OfBcer ia Pariyossw. Kriyanvayan Eikcd Kramank-1, Pradhcavnantri Grasn Sadak Yojna, Bilaspur aud his services have been handed over to Panchayat aud Rural Developxueut Department. He also subnuts that in. pursuaace of the said order, fhe petitioner had Ijoiaed on 8.11.2006 (Aruiexure-P/4) but uo work is being ^, W,P.(S1 No. 4840 of 2007 aUotted to the petitioner on accouat of non-availabitity of tbe post at the tratisferred place because one Mr. J.P. Jaiswal is already working at the said place. Le.amed counsel further subxnits that ffae post itself was not saactioned by the State Govenuiieiit at the traasferred place, He subnaits that necessary dircctionsbe issued to the State Goverument either to properly accoimnodate the petitioner or to make a sanctiou of the post or to provide soine job to fhe petitioner accordiag to his cadre-character or ia the altemative to caucel the initial order oftransfer oftiie petitioner. Haviug heard the leamed counsel for the petitioner as also the State, having considered the facts an.d circuiustauces of fhe case, particularly after goiag fhrough fhe niemo dated 7.11.2006 (Aajiexuie-P/5), ia fhe opinion offhis Court, ends of justice would be served, tf tiie petitioner is dirccted to file a detailed repiesentation before ftie coacemed aufhority aiid the said authorily is directed to dispose of the same wifhia flie sfipulated tune graated by fhis Court. Accordingly, this petition is disposed ofwith a direction fhat if so advised, fhe petitioner inay ffle a detailed representation wifhiu a period of 3 weeks frovi today along with copy of this order, copy of writ petition aad docunieiit aunexed wifh. the writ petition before the concemed authorily aud if such a lepresentation is filed, the sam.e shall be disposed of by the said aufhorily at the earUest consideriug ftie grounds raised by . the petitioner aad the contents ot'Anxtexure-P/5. With aforesaid directions/observations, the petition staads fiuaBy disposed of. §d/. Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge vatti