IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.881 OF 2008. APPLICATION NO.881 OF 2008. APPLICATION NO.881 OF 2008. IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO.2052 OF 2006. APPEAL NO.2052 OF 2006. APPEAL NO.2052 OF 2006. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders. orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ms K.R.Brid i/by Y.M.Chaudhari for the Applicants. Shri Sameer Bhaleka for the Respondent No.4. Shri J.J.Xavier for the Respondent No.5. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 07th MARCH, 2008. : 07th MARCH, 2008. : 07th MARCH, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard advocates appearing for the parties. The applicants/appellants are the original plaintiffs. It appears that during pendency of the suit there was no injunction granted in favour of the applicants in terms of prayer clause (b) of this application. The suit filed by the applicants has been dismissed. Now in the appeal the applicants cannot claim injunction as prayed. It is however obvious that all further transactions in respect of the flats and shops referred to in prayer clause (b) will be subject to final outcome of the appeal. 2. Subject to what is stated above, application is rejected. Judge. Judge. Judge.