CRR No.1609 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR No.1609 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.01.2011 Umed Singh ....Petitioner Versus Prem and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjay S. Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) CRM No.29883 of 2010 For the reasons stated, delay of 96 days in filing the revision is condoned. CM stands allowed. CRR No.1609 of 2010 Grievance of the revisionist is that despite of finding accused- respondents guilty under Sections 323, 324 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, learned Appellate Court has enlarged them on probation under Section 4(1) of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 and while releasing them on probation, learned Appellate Court has not enhanced the fine/compensation in terms of Section 357 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2 fairly stated that CRR No.1609 of 2010 (O&M) -2- let fine/compensation under Section 357 Cr.P.C. be enhanced to Rs.10,000/-, which shall be deposited with the learned Trial Court within 15 days from today. Present petition is disposed of in view of the statement made by the learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2. Let respondents deposit enhanced fine/compensation of Rs.10,000/- with the learned Trial Court within 15 days from today. On such deposit being made same shall be given to the complainant/petitioner by the learned Trial Court. (Alok Singh) Judge January 14, 2011 R.S.