IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10731 of 2001 SHATRUDHAN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3. 16.09.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for Private Respondent Nos. 7 and 8. 2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 02.01.2001 passed by the Deputy Director, Consolidation, (Headquarter), Bihar, Patna in Revision Case No. 70 of 2000, Annexure-4. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner with reference to the averments made in paragraph 13 of this writ application that the said order was passed behind his back although it appears from the record that lawyers appeared on his behalf on two dates which is not a fact as petitioner was never served with any notice of the revision proceedings. In support of such pleading learned counsel for the petitioner has relied on the order-sheet of the revision case. Averments made in paragraph 13 of the writ petition has not been denied by filing counter affidavit. 4. In the circumstances, this Court has to accept the averments made in paragraph 13 of the writ petition and, accordingly, the order dated 02.01.2001 passed by the Deputy Director, Consolidation, (Headquarter), Bihar, - 2 - Patna in Revision Case No. 70 of 2000, Annexure-4 is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the Director, Consolidation, before whom the petitioner and the private respondents should appear on 20th October, 2008 and thereafter the Director, Consolidation should fix a date for hearing of the revision application and after hearing both the parties dispose of the same in accordance with law as early as possible, in any case within a period of three months from the date of their appearance. 5. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)