IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15266 of 2007 Mukesh Kumar, son of Sri Siv kumar Ram, resident of village Somnaha Godam, P.O. Somnaha Mirjanagar, P.S. Chak Mehsi, District Samastipur … Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Secretary, Education Department, Patna 2. The Director, Human Resources Development Department, Patna 3. The Collector, Samastipur 4. The Block Development Officer, Kalyanpur, Block District Samastipur 5. Panchayat Sewak, Gram Panchayat Raj Somnaha Kalyanpur Block, District Samastipur 6. Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Somnaha Block Kalyanpur, District Samastipur … Respondents ----------- 2. 25.7.2011 Having regard to the fact that the petitioner’s appointment on the post of Panchayat Shikshak came to be questioned by the impugned order dated 26.4.2007 by the Panchayat Secretary and that the petitioner’s representation before the Block Development Officer, Kalyanpur also did not effectively lead to redressal of grievance of the petitioner who still remains out of service on the orders of the Panchayat Secretary, this Court would find it expedient in the ends of justice to direct the concerned District Teachers Appellate Authority to look into the grievance of the petitioner afresh if a complaint in terms of Rule 18 of Panchayat Shikshak Rules, 2006 is 2 filed within a period of one month from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order. Such petitioner’s complaint should also include the name and details of such person who has been allegedly appointed in his place in view of the order passed by the Panchayat Secretary. It goes without saying that since this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim of the petitioner, the authority shall look into not only the panel prepared for appointment of Panchayat Shikshak but in case it would be found by the authority that the petitioner was edged out on a wholly irrelevant consideration and that he was replaced by someone else having inferior position in the panel, it would also having issued notice to such person and extending opportunity of hearing to both the petitioner and such person will take its final decision within a period of six months from the date of receipt of this order. With the aforementioned observation and direction, this application is disposed of. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/