IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 20853 of 2001 Between: Turkadinne Shanthaiah, S/o. Late Ramulu, R/o. Gopalpet Village & Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Mahaboobnagar District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Wanaparthy, Mahaboobnagar District. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Gopalpet Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District. 4 Anjamma, W/o. Late Chandraiah, R/o. Gopalpet Village & Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an order or direction more particularly in the nature of WRIT OF CERTIORARI to call for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings case D1/13/2000 dt. 28-4-2001 on the file of the 1st Respondent and declare the same as arbitrary, illegal and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.NARASIMHA SARMA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO. 20853 OF 2001 ORDER: Since none appeared for the petitioner on 14.11.2008, the writ petition was directed to be posted “for dismissal”. Today though the writ petition is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, neither is the counsel for the petitioner present nor is there any representation on his behalf. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as costs. ___________ 24-2-2009 asp