'•spsssy"~^'v~w ••:l!SSn^!j-'' • IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT W.P.(227) N0. IS^g /2009 S.B. Chhabilal S/o Shri Kalanath PETITIONER Defendant Before the Sub Ordinate Court . ^^^^ Cr. VERSUS RESPONDENTS Plaintiff/ADDellant before Sub Ordinate Court Sonkar, Aged about 23 years, R/o Sonarpara, Dhamdha, Tahsil- Dhamdhar Dist. Durg (C.G.) Khuba Bai, D/o Gulab Sonkar, aged about 35 years, R/o Nandai Chowk, Rajnandgaon, Tahsil ,& Dist. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through-Collector Rajnandgaon, Dist. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITIONUNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOF INDIA - £. T XI-HC—78 HI*1MI ShHltib 3"^ ";ii<<ii?i-4, ®Tilyis,Fs|(rll'9y,< ,^-^.f-^.^-i-^V sn^r'qaq? (l^ifj»<<yT) sir^n'wft-ii'* ,WT 3)I^f ih*<i+ TOIIW ^lid 3ii^r Defendant Before fhe Sub Ordiaate Court Chhabfla)., S/o Kalanafh SorLkar, aged about 23 years) R/o Sonarpara, Dhamdha, Tahsil- Dhamdh^, Distt. Durg (CG) Plamtiff/AiJBeBaut before Sub Ordinate Court Khuba I}ai, D/o Giilab Sonkar, aged about 35 J?/o Nandai Chowk, Rajnaadgaon, Distt. Rajuandgaon (CG) years, Talisil &j Shri C. R. Sahu, counsel fo Shri. Shashaak Thakur, Paiel uisttat ^l'iit?lNt?I f^f^ ^ ^^ <PaR$l< ^aifiman^r State of CUiattisgarh tbrougli - CoUector Rajnand|gaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) fhe petitiouer, Lawyer for fhe State. The petitioner by the iast dated 10.2.2009 passed ia whereby the leamed 1st Additior allowed £he appeal of the uijiuiction ia her favour. Heard leamed counsel for Ijlie petitioner on admission. petttion has inapugned the order M^ceUaaeous Civil Appeal No. 12/08, jal Sessions Judge, Rajuaadgaon has respi(>ndent No. 1 aud granted teiaporaiy Itj: J" f Xi-HC—78 siRSI'wfeiW '(TSTT 3Ti^?T tt>^ii<ft T '3-5T "41<l|t'1<<, 8>Ttly-i|<o, fstdiy^ <4[Hi?(T tRW^l •WI, 200 an^r'qTW ('^3'l^T) 9i TOIIW ^rfsa SiT^I 2 paragra^ih From perusal of observed that the AppeUate Co^ injunctiou ia favour of the possession of the plaintiff over Q\ by the defeudant aiid further possession of the disputed prop^ between fhe parties canbe decid| 14 of fhe impugn.ed order, it is jrt has passed the order of teniporary resTtiondent No.l with a findiug that the ft^e siiit property has not been disputed that fhe plaintiff is m. contuiuous ^rty siace long and the dispiite oftitle ;d only after recording ofevidence. After going ttu'ough fhe i^i considered opraion that fhere is error committed by fhe Couift exercises of fhe jurisdiction un^ In view of the above onder, *Mfo^4 'RTO^ff ^f 'fe1^ <Fi>)'<-$)< '^sifrosii^i itnpugned order, fhis Court is of fhe |no iUegalily, infirmity or jurisdictional below warraD.ting interfereiice ui .S.er Article 227 of the Coustitution of The petition is accordiag^y dismissed at tlie admission stage I.A, No. 1 also staads disposed of. Sd/- pturendraMisbra ^ Judge • BIB iK'S'iiSa A»'.