IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 39 of 2007 (S/B) Narendra Dutt S/o Sri Mukesh Ram, Presently posted as Orthopedic Surgeon, District Hospital Pauri, District Pauri Garhwal, Uttarakhand. ……… Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand, through Secretary, Medical Health and Family Welfare, Dehradun. 2. Director General, Medical Health and Family Welfare, Uttarakhand, Dehradun. 3. Chief Medical Officer, Pauri, District Pauri Garhwal. 4. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pension, New Delhi. 5. State of U.P. through Secretary, Medical Health and Family Welfare, Lucknow. 6. Director, Medical Health and Family Welfare, Lucknow. ……… Respondents Mr. L.K. Tiwari, Advocate on behalf of Mr. U.P.S. Negi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ashish Joshi, Brief Holder for respondents Nos. 1 to 3. Ms. Anjali Bhargava, Addl. Standing Counsel (Central Govt.) for respondent No.4. Ms. Beena Pandey , Standing Counsel (U.P. Govt.) for respondents. Nos. 5 & 6. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Mr. L.K. Tiwari, Advocate on behalf of Mr. U.P.S. Negi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ashish Joshi, Brief Holder for respondents. Nos. 1 to 3. Ms. Anjali Bhargava, Addl. Standing Counsel (Central Govt.) for respondent No.4. Ms. Beena Pandey, Standing Counsel (U.P. Govt.) for respondents Nos. 5 & 6. 2. Mr. L.K. Tewari, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition filed by petitioner Narendra Dutt, seeking his relieving for the State of Uttar Pradesh, has now become infructuous, as the petitioner has already been relieved during the pendency of the writ petition. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 19.11.2007 19.11.2007 G