^ 'f\- ^ APPELLANT NON-CLAIMANT HIGH COURT OF CaiHATTISGUtRH A3 MA. (C) P.R. No. 2001/08 Pokbiaj Siagh, S/o Rataa Singh Siagh, aged about 62 years, Occupation-Transport, R/o ViUage- Tundri, PoUce Station & Tahsil- Dabhxa, Distdct -iJaQJ^r-Champa, (C.G.). RB8PONDBNT8 VERSUS 1. 2. 3. Jamuiia Prasffil, S/o Chaaiiar Siiigh, aged about 35 years. Tnbhuvaa, S/o Chamar Siaghi^ aged about 33 years, Haas Kxuaar, S/o Chamiar Smgh^ aged about 25 yeare, AU are Caste of Kanwar, Occupatioxi- Agdciiltunst, R/o Village-Bhendia, Tahsil-Gharghoda, Distnct-Raigarh, (C.G.). 4. Taimu Rafhiya, S/o Narayan Ra&iya, aged about 34 yeacs, Occiipatioxi- Driver of fhe vehicle, R/o ViUage- Tundri, Pofice Station aad Tahsil- Dabhra, District-Janjgir-Cham{ i, (C.G.). 5. Uxuted India Iiisuraace Compaoy, iafix>nt of Gopi TaUdes, Raigarh, Distdct Raigarh, (C.G.) 6. Cliamar Singh Kanwar, S/o Paadru, aged about 65 years^ Caste -K^awar, R/o VIUage-Bhendm, Tafasil- Gharghoda, Distoict Raigarh (C.G.). -*J»PBALUNDBR SBCTIOII 173 OF MOTOR VBHCILB ACT. Arismg out of fhe award dated 25/4/2008 passed by tihie leatoied IIIxd Additional Motor Accident CIadm Tribiiaal, (P,TC.) Raigarh, ixi Cldvm Case N0. 19/2007. (8B :Hon>ble Mr. T.P.Sluuraoia, J.) Present:- Shri Sunil Sahu, Advocate for fhe appellaiit ORAL- ORDBR (PaMedoa 17/03/2009) 1. During the course of argument, leamed eoiinsel for the appellant submits that he seeks to withdraw this appeal with Uberty to file applicaticm after oomplying the provisions of Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Aot. ^ 2< Prayer allowed. 3. Accordm^ the appeal ia dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 4. Certified oopy filed on behalf of the appellant shall be returaed to the appellant on- fumishing a duly attested photoeopy of the same. 5. No order as to the coste. T.P. Shanna Judge