@ rag (6'37; V ’ « i .; i 1 i ; . _ 1N THE gHI§H 2 ‘ COURT OF CHHATILSGARH y 1 AT BILASBUR > . L ! Writ Petition (g1 No. §6§ (2;);0 // Suresh Kuma‘r Chetal S/o Late L.R. Chetal, Nged about 59 years, R/o F—l, 5 Pankanj Vikram‘ Complex Rajeindra Nagai‘ Raipur District Raipufr (C.G.) PETITIéNéR VERSUS /1) Union of India through The ' Regio'nal Labour Commissioner(Centtjal) L-7 , Sectro—l (Extn.)‘ ‘Avanti Vihar Raipur (C.G.), Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central) Raipur and Controlling . Authority Under the Payment of \ Gratuity Act 1972, Behind Balalji ’ Mandir, Anand Nagar Raipur (C.G.) ' L The Hindustan Steel Works‘ Construction Limited Through Group General Manager Bhilai" District Durg (C.G.) vf’ L ‘ RESPONDENTS‘, WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/ 227 OF THE ‘ CONSTITUTION OF INDI ’ / ; A HGH CGURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETiTiON it) NO565 OF 2m 0 \ ; i ETETIGNER Smash Kumar Cheta! P i I I SPONDENTS ‘ Union of india & cbthers Versus § (Writ Petition under Amcle 226i227 of the Canstltutton of incha) {Singie Bench Hon bie Shn Satish K Agnlhotn J Shn Vlrendra Sharma counsel ’ror ti4e petitioner Ms Fouzxa Mirza A33Istant $ohc1tor Genera! for the Union of hdua OPDER {ORAL} : (Passed onthis 8 day cf February, 701 O) With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the pames, the petmon Is heard fmany Bv this petition the petmoner impugns the notice dated 8 1—2005 (Annexure — PM) Issued by the Asststant Labour Commtssmner e and Controltmg Authority (Central) Ralpur under the Paymert of , Gratuity Act 1972 to the respondent No 3 Hindustan Steet Works L Constructton Lamlted Learned counsel appearing for the petltloner submlts that the ' directlon to the respondent No .3 has direct bearing on the gratuit Eof the petrtroner therefore the petrtroner rs competent to prefer thrs I Vpetitron Learned counsel further refers an order passed by thrs lCourt w.thout annexmg a copy of the same On a query asto where ris the copy of the order passed by thrs Court learned counsel very ’boid y submits that there rs a reference and at rs not necessary to r t le copy of the sard order Fln vrew of the fact that the Assistant Labour Commissloner and Controlllng Authority (Centre!) Raipur under the Payment of - Gratuity Act 1972 is fully competent to take action against the management it .s not proper for this Court to entertarn this petition: at thrs stage Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed at the motion stage rtslf e Sd/- _ SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI ' i‘ Jud e a ' " -_A RE 1 2 ‘ y : ‘