IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 211 of 2002 (M/B) Kunwar Singh Rawat S/o Bachan Singh Rawat, District Government Counsel (Criminal) District Rudraprayag. …… Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Secretary, Law and Justice, Government of Uttaranchal, Dehradun 2. Legal Remembrancer, Government of Uttaranchal, Dehradun. 3. District Magistrate, Rudraprayag 4. District Judge, Rudraprayag …… Respondents …….. Sri Pankaj Purohit, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for the respondents. Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble P.C.Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Sri Pankaj Purohit, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. Sri Pankaj Purohit, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has now become infructuous. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. (P.C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 19.04.2006 19.04.2006 A