IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14957 of 2009 1. RAJEEV NAYAN S/O RAMANUGRAH SINGH VILL.- NAROMURAR, P.S. WARSALIGANJ, DISTT.- NAWADAH 2. RAJU KUMAR S/O LATE HARI NARAYAN SINGH VILL.- NAROMURAR, P.S. WARSALIGANJ, DISTT.- NAWADAH 3. RAMBOL KUMAR S/O RAM SARAN SINGH VILL.- NAROMURAR, P.S. WARSALIGANJ, DISTT.- NAWADAH ---------- PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE HOME COMMISSIONER BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR MILITARY POLICE BIHAR, PATNA 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SHEIKHPURA 6. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GAYA 7. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NALANDA 8. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NAWADAH 9. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, LAKHISARAI 10. THE BIHAR MILITARY POLICE (B.M.P.) 5 AT PATNA 11. THE BIHAR MILITARY POLICE (B.M.P.) 18 GAYA 12. THE BIHAR MILITARY POLICE (B.M.P.) 9 AT JAMALPUR ---------------- RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 23-11-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The claim relates to appointment on the post of constable under Advertisement Nos.1/04 and 3/04 .They claimed selection in the year 2006 but have filed writ application in the year 2009 The application appears speculative in nature. There are no allegations of persons with lesser merit or lower in the panel having been appointed. The Court is not persuaded to start a roving enquiry. If the petitioners file a representation of the manner as directed in C.W.J.C.No.12897 of 2009, only in that event - 2 - the Respondents are required to consider and dispose of their representations by a reasoned and speaking order in the like period of time as fixed therein. The application stands disposed. NKS/- ( Navin Sinha, J)