IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 5TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 14TH BHADRA 1930 RP.No. 971 of 2008(N) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.14627/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS : RESPONDENTS --------------------------- 1. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE JOINT OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES MALAPPURAM. 3. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES )GENERAL MANJERI. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.ANU SIVARAMAN RESPONDENTS: PETITIONERS ------------- 1. P.V.KOYA, S/O.USSAN KUTTY, PUTHANVEETIL HOUSE, MUNDENGARA, EDAVANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. E.ABOOBACKER, S/O. KUNHALI, ELEDATH HOUSE, KARAPARAMBU, PULPATTA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADVOCATE SRI.BABU S.NAIR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: rtr THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.P.No.971 of 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 5th day of September, 2008. O R D E R This review petition is filed on the premise that Annexure-R1(a) order was not brought to the notice of this Court, while the judgment sought to be reviewed was issued. The result of the judgment sought to be reviewed is only a direction to convene the meeting of the Circle Co-operative Union, the essential object being to assess whether it has a quorum. Therefore, that direction has to be carried to its logical end since vide separate order, I have today admitted WP(C)No.26968/2008 against the order which is produced in this review petition as Annexure-R1 (a) and have stayed its operation. This review petition is, therefore, dismissed directing that the directions contained in the judgment in WP(C) 14627/2008 shall be carried out and the RP971/2008 -: 2 :- consequence placed before this Court in the form of a report at the earliest. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/050908