IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT APPEAL NO : 1060 of 2007 and Writ Petition No.21872 of 2006 Writ Appeal No.1060 of 2007 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 27/02/2007 in WP NO : 21872 OF 2006 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 K. Madhusudhan Rao, S/o. Late K.V. Ramana Rao, D.No.17-377, Rajiv Nagar Colony, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. 2 D. Srinivasulu Murthy, S/o. Obulesu, D.No.14-4-1, Reddeppa Naidu Colony, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. ..... APPELLANT(S) AND 1 The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority, Parisrama Bhavan, 3rd Floor, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad-29, rep. by its chief Managing Director 2 The United India Insurace Company Ltd., Unitd Building, Whites Road, Chennai, rep. by its Chief Managing Director. 3 The United India Insurance Company Ltd., Gandhi Road, madanapalle, ChittoorDistrict, rep. by its Branch Manager. 4 Sri P.D. Tanweer Ahmed, United India Insurance Company Ltd., Gandhi Road, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:MR.S.S.BHATT Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.K.SRINIVASA MURTHY Writ Petition No.21872 of 2006 Between: 1 K. Madhusudhan Rao, S/o. Late K.V. Ramana Rao, D.No.17-377, Rajiv Nagar Colony, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. 2 D. Srinivasulu Murthy, S/o. Obulesu, D.No.14-4-1, Reddeppa Naidu Colony, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority, Parisrama Bhavan, 3rd Floor, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad-29, rep. by its chief Managing Director 2 The United India Insurace Company Ltd., Unitd Building, Whites Road, Chennai, rep. by its Chief Managing Director. 3 The United India Insurance Company Ltd., Gandhi Road, madanapalle, ChittoorDistrict, rep. by its Branch Manager. 4 Sri P.D. Tanweer Ahmed, United India Insurance Company Ltd., Gandhi Road, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction one in the nature of writ of Mandamus or apapropirate order or direction declaring the action of respondents 1 and 2 in not initiating any action against the employees of 3rd respondent office or conduct enquiry or atlease dispose off several representations on several dates, including the representation dt. 01.11.2005, being the latest, submitted by the petitioners as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to take action, or conduct enquiry or dispose the representation dt. 01.11.2005 etc., submited by the petitioners in the interest of justice and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.S.BHATT Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.A.RAJENDRA BABU The Court made the following : Judgment: (Per TGK,J) The petitioners approached this Court and filed writ petition No. 21872 of 2006 with the following prayer: “to issue an order or direction one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or appropriate order or direction declaring the action of respondents 1 and 2 in not initiating any action against the employees of 3rd respondent office or conduct enquiry or atleast dispose of several representations on several dates, including the representation dated 1-11-2005, being the latest, submitted by the petitioners as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to take action, or conduct enquiry or dispose of the representation dated 1-11-2005 etc., submitted by the petitioners in the interest of justice and pass such other or further orders as this Honourable court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” Detailed counters are filed by respondent No.1 and also by respondents 2 and 3. Having considered the matter, the learned single Judge directed the writ petition to be posted for final hearing, by his order dated 7-2-2007. He further directed that the Miscellaneous Petition also should be posted along with the writ petition. Questioning the said order, this writ appeal is filed. Heard the learned Advocates. All the parties have agreed across the Bar stating that the representation given by the appellants will be considered by the authorities at the earliest. If for any reason the appellants want to give further representation or bring any other factual aspects to the notice of the respondents 1 to 3, they can do so and the same shall be considered within a period of four weeks from today. The writ appeal is accordingly disposed of. In the light of the said order, in our considered view no further orders need be passed in the writ petition and accordingly the writ petition is also closed. ___________________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ _______________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J Note: Issue copy in two days. /B.O/ GRR To 1. The Chairman, Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority, Parisrama Bhavan, 3rd Floor, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad- 29. 2. The Chief Managing Director, United India Insurace Company Ltd., United Building, Whites Road, Chennai. 3. The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Company Ltd., Gandhi Road, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. 4. Two CD copies