rin?f>, 53, "wrS :© ^;..' m THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WMT PETITION {CLNQ.,,.'s..^..e../2006 PETITIONER ^ -o^& ^ ^^> a^»^ ^ w Baldeo Joshi, S/o Late Durga Dutta^ Joshi, aged about 59 years, R/o Kapu, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 1 Regional Transport Authority,/^ Clihattisgarh at Raipur. 2 Secretary, Regional Transport/^' Authority, Chhattisgarh at BUaspur. WRIT PETITION UNDER ^ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA RESPONDENTS XI-HC-78 MiH^raiHT^i 3^'^lFdcra', ®lfl^'l$,f«ldlU^< ri^WP.^^.^J.W^; 200 STTcRT T??7 ('i?^3^8T) 3n^T?iTf?:lR) gsiTan^Tstiiieh Q^^ ^y r^' TOiraTBfStTsn^r 24.11.2006 Shri Anshul Shrivastava, A( Shri Sushil Dubey, Govemn|ient Heard. The petitioner has prefem respondent No.1 be directed to c< regarding change of time in Permi| Tamta via Kapu & Pathalgaon. The petitioner made the No.1 on 17.07.2006, but responde|it Prayer made by learned| respondent No.1 may be direct< petitioner in accordance with Advocate for the State has no obj^c Having heard leamed counf the facte and circumstances of th( consider the application of the pe^ the above route in accordance v( from the date of receipt of copy of|this With the direction aforesai4 Consequently, M.(W.)P. Vjl stand disposed of. Certified copy as (»rrule. ^rafeNN'wRff ir'tec^ T)SRZR ^srf^q'an^T <vocate for the petitioner. Advocate for the State. jd this writpetition witti a prayer that (nsider the applteation of the petitioner No.994/8/99 for the route Supkalo to |above application before respondent No.1 is not deciding the same. counsel for the petttioner is that |d to consider the application of the |aw, to whidi learned Government lction. >el for the parUes and having regard to case, respondent No.1 is directed to titioner regarding change of timings on fith law within a period of one month order. the petition stands disposed of. to.4760/06 & IA lslo.11106/W also ©) Judge P.T.O.