IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30957 of 2008 MAKKU YADAV @ MAKU YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.8.2008 Heard. The ground for seeking bail of the petitioner is that in spite of having obtained an order of release under Section 167(2)Proviso Cr.P.C. on 12th of March, 2008 i.e. on the 154th days of remand in the case, merely because the petitioner had not filed the bond as directed and in the meantime the chargesheet being submitted, the court refused to release him from prison. The second contention is that on the very reading of the FIR there does not appear any cause to any one and the allegations are generally made that all accused persons swooped upon the house of the informant, fired indiscriminately and went away with some livestock. There is no specific allegation, it is contended as to who fired and above all there is no injury caused to any one. As regards the prayer for release under Section 167(2)Cr.P.C. the learned counsel gives up that argument and stuck to the argument on merits and considering that let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri N. Pandit, Additional District Judge, F.T.C.I, Begusarai in S.T.No.452 of 2008(Samho P.S.Case no.38 of 2007). B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )