1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.296 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2430 OF 2007 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders Mr.C.R.Deshpande, learned counsel for petitioner. Mr.P.D.Bachate, learned counsel for respondent no.1 and 2 Mr.B.V.Wagh, learned AGP for respondent no.3, (CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.) DATE : 30 th MARCH 2010 The present contempt petition is filed by the petitioner alleging the contempt against the respondents, as the affidavit in reply in W.P. No.2430/2007, deliberately material facts are suppressed and incorrect information was provided. Hence this petition. As per directions given on the last date, fresh affidavit is filed by the 2 nd respondent on 22/03/2010, wherein, in para no.6 to para no. 12, the contention is raised that the facts disclosed in the affidavit in reply on the basis of material provided by the concerned, as the 2 respondent no.2 was not having control over the co-ordinate committee and the documents in their possession, but make the statement in the affidavit in reply on the basis of record made available. In para no.13 of the affidavit in reply, it is stated by the 2nd respondent that it was not the intention of these respondents to suppress the material fact or to file false affidavit, but according to the 2 nd respondent, he is tendering un-conditional apology to this Court for the act inadvertently committed by him. The un-conditional apology is accepted and the proceedings are dropped against the respondents. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands disposed of. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/MAR 2010/cp-296-08