AB 335/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE K.MERUNO Heard Mr. G.Uddin, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B.S.Sinha, learned Addl.P.P, for the State. By this application U/S 438 Cr.P.C,the accused-petitioner Ayub Khan has prayed f or pre-arrest bail in connection with Barpeta P.S. Case No. 1081 of 2010 corres ponding to G.R. Case No. 1760/10 under Sections 448/376 IPC. The learned Addl.P.P,Assam has produced the Case Diary and upon hearing the lear ned Counsel for the parties as well as on perusal of the Case Diary, it reveals that though the I.O. has made several attempts to search out the accused however , none of the relatives even the father has been co-operate with the I.O. to whe re about of the accused . The allegations revealed in the FIR against the modesty of a lady not one but tw ice. On consideration of all aspects of the matter, this Court is not inclined to gra nt pre-arrest bail to the accused-petitioner. In view of the above, pre-arrest bail to the accused-petitioner stands rejected.