THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 3277 of 2010 ORDER: 1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order dated 21.06.2010 in I.A. No.2311 of 2007 in O.S. No.533 of 2007 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Tirupati. 2. The petitioner/plaintiff filed Original Suit No.533 of 2007 before the court below for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 17.6.1973. The defence of the respondent/defendant is that he never executed the said agreement and it is a forged document. He filed the present application under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to send agreement of sale dated 17.6.1973 to hand-writing expert along with signatures of respondent/defendant taken in court and other admitted signatures, for comparison and opinion. Vide the impugned order, the trial court allowed the application ordering to send the suit document dated 17.6.1973 to Government Hand-writing expert on submission of contemporaneous admitted signatures of the defendant apart from the signatures to be taken in the court. Aggrieved by the same, the present revision is preferred by the plaintiff. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Inspite of service of notice, none appears for the respondent. 4. The impugned order in so far as directing the defendant to give signatures in the court, cannot be accepted in view of the fact that the disputed signatures on the suit document related to the year 1973, and having observed that if the signatures were taken in the court for the purpose of comparison there was every possibility for the defendant to disguise his original signature, the trial court ought not to have directed the defendant to give his specimen signatures in the court. Therefore, the impugned order in so far it relates to directing the defendant to give specimen signatures in the court is set aside. However, this order will not preclude the defendant from securing the contemporaneous admitted signatures, if any, during the relevant time of the suit document and sending the same to the expert comparison with the disputed signatures. 5. With the above observation, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed. No costs. --------------------- (K.C.Bhanu, J.) 10.3.2011 DRK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 3277 of 2010 10.3.2011 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 3277 of 2010 10.3.2011 Between: Kokalakari Rosi Reddy …Petitioner And Vanjivakam Kuppaiah Pillai …Respondent