MC 141/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AC UPADHYAY Amitava Roy, J Heard Mr. MK Choudhury, Senior Advocate assisted by Ms. U Das, Advocate for the applicants. The present is an application for condonation of delay of 72 days in filing the accompanying writ appeal. On a scrutiny of the averments made in the application, this Court is of the vie w that those are vague and lack in precision as well as in substance. The statem ents made in the application even prima facie do not make out sufficient cause w ithin the meaning of section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. As a matter of fact, the respondent No. 1 in his affidavit has, in essence, raised the same objectio n vis-a-vis the grounds offered for condonation of delay. In that view of the matter, we do not consider it a fit case for condonation of delay that has occasioned. The miscellaneous application stands closed.