IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33549 of 2009 1.KISHORI MAHTO @ KISHORI LAL, son of Jokhan Mahto 2.REKHA DEVI w/o Kishori Mahto Both resident of Village-Pokuraira, P.S. Samastipur Muffasil, District-Samastipur. ---Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.11.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Samastipur (Muffassil) P.S. Case No.193/09 for the alleged offences registered under section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the petitioners, who are the father- in-law and the mother-in-law of the deceased, have been implicated in this case without any specific allegation. As a matter of fact, petitioner no.1 is working in Delhi and living along with his wife, as would be appearing from Annexure 2. Learned APP appearing for the State submits that on perusal of the F.I.R. it would appear that the husband of the deceased had threatened the informant and demanded motorcycle, failing which her daughter will be done to death. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioners no.1 and 2 above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Samastipur (Muffassil) P.S. Case No.193/09 within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on 2 bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)