CWP No.18900 of 2009.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.18900 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.11.2010 **** Gurdeep Singh . . . . Petitioner VS. Punjab and Sind Bank & Ors. . . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. SS Grewal, Advocate for the petitioner None for the respondents ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). No reply has been filed by the respondents despite the order dated August 11, 2010 nor the costs have been paid. In fact, no one appears on behalf of the respondent-Bank, who remained unrepresented on last three dates of hearing also. (2). Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, I find that his claim for grant of Leave Travel Concession is covered by a Division Bench decision dated 12.12.2007 in case of Tej Partap Singh and others v. Punjab and Sind Bank & Ors. (CWP No.13223 of 2004). (3). The writ petition is accordingly allowed in terms of Tej Partap Singh’s case (supra). (4). Dasti . CWP No.18900 of 2009.doc - 2 – 02.11.2010 vishal shonkar (SURYA KANT) JUDGE