-1- IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO.1094 OF 2006 NO.1094 OF 2006 NO.1094 OF 2006 Smt Sakhubai N. Mohite and ors. ...Appellants v/s Haridas Dattu Gaikwad and ors. ...Respondents Mr A.M. Kulkarni for Appellants. None for Respondents. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH J. DATE : 20TH JULY 2007. -2- P.C. :- 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellants. In view of the admission of P.W.No.1 that there were other ancestral properties, in my opinion, the appeal Court was right in holding that in the absence of all the ancestral properties being brought for partition, the plaintiffs were not entitled to claim a decree for partition. I do not see any substantial question of law arising in this appeal. Appeal is rejected. Civil application No.1900 of 2006 is disposed off. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Sheristedar / Private Secretary as true copy. . Certified copy expedited. ------------------