IE THg §L§H CQQRT QE QgQI§i QRE 5T §ILA§PQR W .8 5‘0 2 / Mejaji La: Kori, Son «if shri B. a. Kori; aged about 33 years, accupation-$ewice, Presenth/ working a5 ?atwari, Ha‘ka NO. 1‘}, Ratanpur, Tami! Kata. District B'naspur (C.G.). ‘w‘w /" w State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur gag). The Deputy Secretary, ‘Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The Commissioner, (Land Records), 'Raipur (C.G.)‘ The Cnuector, District Biiaspur, (C.G.). / PTINND RT OF 0 F-I I r - n . Lg" ‘- ugnlApj- P.T.O. XI-HC—78 Wm HE 200 m Wm , Wm (W) WW, W'Emmgr wmm . mmwm a7af$rtr3mf¥r 1 33.2006 Wk Heard Shri Bhaskar Payasi, Adv. for the petitioner. $hri A5. Kachhawaha, Govt. Adv. for the State on advance copy. By the instant petition thq: petitioner has questioned the iegaiity, propriety and correctness of order-dated 30.62006 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Patwari Haika No.17 Ratanpur, District Bilaspur to Patwari Haika No.19, Mungeli, District Biiaspur. The main ground 9f the petitioner to chaiienge this transfe r is that he has been transferred within a short span of period against the trziansfer policy of the State. It is settled iaw that the Court can exercise the power of judicial review in case of transfer of an employee only when the transfer is an ' outcome of maiafide or contrary to the statutory rules or impugned order is passed by the incompetent authority. The petitioner’s case is not covered in any of the aforesaid conditions, therefore, there is no merit in this petition, same is iiabie to be dismi seed and it is accordingiy, dismissed. ,7 J Consequently, M.(W.)P. NEL2640/06 aiso stands dismissed. A l l Rosharti— l Sd/- L.C. Bha‘doo