CWP No. 4626/2010 6.8.2010 Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. AG with Mr.J.K.Verma, Dy. AG for the respondents. The petitioner has prayed for the following relief in the writ petition: 1. Directing the respondents to regularize the service of the petitioner with effect from 1.1.1992 instead of 1.1.1998, on the analogy of Sh. Som Dass son of Sh. Parma Nand working in the same Range as that of the petitioner, in view of Annexure P-5 with all consequential benefits including seniority and arrears accruing thereon on this account. 2. Any other and further orders which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case, may kindly be passed in the interest of justice. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that one similarly situated petitioner filed OA No. 3625/1999 titled as Som Dass Vs. State of HP which was decided in favour of the said petitioner vide order dated 17th May, 2005 ( Annexure P-2 ). The said order was affirmed by this court vide order dated 4th August, 2006 passed in CWP No. 420/2006 titled State of HP & anr Vs. Som Dass ( Annexure P-3 ). Following the order of this Court passed on 4.8.2006 in CWP No. 420/06, the Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 4251/2010 titled as Hima Ram Vs. State of HP & others, has been pleased to dispose of the CWP No. 4251/2010 vide order dated 24.7.2010. According to the petitioner, the claim of the petitioner is also similar to that of Som Dass. In these circumstances, an appropriate direction has been given by this Court in CWP No. 4251/2010 on 24.7.2010. In the absence of any contrary instructions, submission of the petitioner is not opposed. In the prevailing facts and circumstances, the present writ petition is being disposed of, with an observation that the petitioner’s representation contained in Annexure P-4, dated 18.4.2010, is to be considered by the first respondent by a speaking order, within four weeks from today, if necessary, after hearing the petitioner or his authorized representative in the light of the order dated 4.8.2006 passed in CWP No. 420/2006 as well as in the light of the order dated 24.7.2010 passed in CWP No. 4251/2010 by the Division Bench of this Court. Copy Dasti. ( R.B. Misra ), J. ( V.K. Sharma), J. 6th August, 2010(sl)