1 S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.1419/2007 Peera Ram. vs. Mangi Lal & Ors. S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.1419/2007 Peera Ram. vs. Mangi Lal & Ors. Date : 12.11.2008 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.ML Khatri, for the appellant. Mr.Dhanpat Choudhary, for the respondent. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. The appellant is aggrieved against the award dated 12.1.2007 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Barmer in MACT Case No.70/2004, by which, according to the appellant, less compensation has been awarded by the Tribunal on account of the injuries suffered by the appellant. According to learned counsel for the appellant, the appellant produced the receipts of fare paid for the taxi hired by the appellant for going from Jodhpur to Harsol in Barmer District which are Ex.52 and Ex.53 but that amount has not been awarded by the Tribunal. 2 S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.1419/2007 Peera Ram. vs. Mangi Lal & Ors. I perused the receipts exhibited. The distance between Barmer and Jodhpur is less than 300 kms. The appellant produced receipt Ex.52 for Rs.5,000/- for single trip and receipt Ex.52 for Rs.10,000/- for two trips. The evidence on the face of it is unreliable, therefore, the tribunal rightly did not award this amount. The appellant suffered four grievous injuries for which the Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs.5,000/- for each injury and also awarded Rs.5,000/- for 5 minor injuries and Rs.19,000/- for his remaining hospitalised and in all awarded Rs.51,000/- in a case where the appellant produced certificate of disablement of 5.6%. In view of the above, I do not find that the Tribunal has awarded less compensation than it should have awarded. Consequently, this appeal, having no merits, is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya