IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Writ Petition No. 86 of 2009 Date of decision: February 5, 2009 Gulam Mohammad ….. Petitioner Versus Subhash Chander and another ….. Respondents Present: Mr. N.S. Shekhawat, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Nonish Kumar, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. *** S.S. SARON, J. This petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for issuance of a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus for directing respondents to produce Fatema begum @ Mamta wife of the petitioner as respondents No.1 and 2 had illegally confined her. Mr. Nonish Kumar, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2 and both the respondents are present in person. They have produced the alleged detenue in Court. Learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2 identifies her (detenue). It is stated by the person produced in Court that her name is Mamta Rani daughter of Subash Chand aged 22 years and that she is residing with her parents of her own free will. It is stated that she is not under any kind of pressure or undue influence. Learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2 has also submitted a photostat copy of statement of Mamta Rani (detenue) recorded by the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Karnal on 11.1.2009 at 6.20 p.m. The same is also taken on record. In view thereof, nothing survives in the present petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. (S.S. SARON) February 5, 2009 JUDGE amit