IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8232 of 2010 MAHENDRA SAHNI @ MAHINDRA SAHNI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 12.4.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. If it was a case of kidnapping then also it is submitted on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner had any hand in kidnapping though victim has been shown kidnapped but no role has been shown played by this petitioner and the statement of victim under section 164 Cr.P.C. is exonerating the petitioner as she is not naming this petitioner at any stage rather she was taken to Delhi. Lalita Devi was instrumental and after reaching there she was being taken work of maid. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial 2 Magistrate, Samastipur in Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 175/2008, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)