IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12785 of 2010 ARJUN BURNWAL @ ARJUN PRASAD BURNWAL, Son of Mahabir Burwal, resident of Mohalla Bhukar Mohalla , P.S. Jamui, District Jamui ……. Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ….. Opposite Party ----------- For the petitioner : M/s N.K.Agrawal, Sr. Advocate and S.P.Parasar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. ------ 3 7.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 468, 482, 483, 486, 487, 488, 272, 420B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of the E.C. Act. Earlier the petitioner was granted provisional bail. Thereafter, he has surrendered and in support of this supplementary affidavit appended therewith a copy of order dated 6.5.2010 passed by the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jamui has been filed. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is nothing on record to show that the seized articles were adulterated inasmuch as neither 2 any sample has been sent for testing nor any report in this regard is on record. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case at the behest of his business rivals. Further contention is that petitioner being an old man and suffering from several ailments is in custody since 18.10.2009. Chargesheet has already been submitted in this case. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, ARJUN BURNWAL @ ARJUN PRASAD BURNWAL, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No. 312 of 2009, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be a close relative or family member of the petitioner, who shall file affidavit before the concerned court giving complete genealogy to show his or her relationship with the petitioner. If, after his release in this case, the 3 petitioner is again found implicated in similar nature of cases, then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)