IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 10862 of 2007 Between: 1 The Vaddera Co-operative Labour contract Society Ltd., (Registered No. Z.642) rep. by its President, S.V.Babu Rao, S/o. S.Ramulu Arundalpet, Narasaraopet, Guntur District. 2 The Lakshmi Ganesha Vaddera Co-Operative Labour Contract Society Ltd., (Registered Z.No.753) Rep. by its President K.Sambi Reddy, S/o. Venkata Reddy, R/o.Palapadu, Narasaraopet Mandal, Guntur District. 3 The Kanakadurga Vaddera Co-operative Labour contract Society Ltd., (Registered No. Z.771) rep. by its President, Sivarathri Pavan Kumar, S/o. Rama Rao, Arundalpet, Narasaraopet, Guntur District. 4 T.V. Sambasiva Rao S/o.Ramanaiah, Engineering Graduate, R/o.D.No. 10-4-69, Arundalpet, Narasaraopet, Guntur District. 5 The Kanakadurga Vaddera Co-operative Labour contract Society Ltd., (Registered No. Z.646) rep. by its President, Sivarathri Rama Rao, S/o.S.Kotaiah R/o.Nagireddypalli Village, Narasaraopet, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONERS AND Narasaraopet Municipality, Rep. by its Commissioner, Narasaraopet, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not giving tender schedule to the petitioner society at free of cost and exemption of EMD in all tenders including works mentioned in the tender notice issued by the first respondent in ROC No.676/2007/F1 dt. 10-5-2007 and in Roc.No.253/2007/E1 dated 14.5.2007 is illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondent to issue the tender schedule to the petitioners societies in respect of all the works including the works mentioned in the tender notice. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.U.RAMANJANEYULU Counsel for the Respondent: MR.S.NAGESWARA REDDY The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that in view of the interim order passed in W.P.M.P.No.13618 of 2007, no further orders are required to be passed. In view of the representation, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. _________________________ (B. Seshasayana Reddy, J.) 14th July, 2008 Js. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 Narasaraopet Municipality, Rep. by its Commissioner, Narasaraopet, Guntur District. 2 2 CCs to G.P. for Municipal Administration and Urban Development, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad. (OUT) 3 2 CD copies.