1 S.B.CR. MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO.5870/2007 (Santosh Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of Order :: December 10, 2007 HON'BLE MR. H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr. Avar Dan Charan, for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Upadhyaya, P.P. for the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the offences are triable by the Court of Judicial Magistrate and the trial is likely to take long time. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the petitioner's shop was raided by the police. The petitioner being the proprietor of Cyber Cafe with the help of computers, he has forged the various driving licences, national permits and other documents relating to deposit of the tax under the Motor Vehicles Act and committed a mass scale forging of driving licence, national permits sub-road tax etc. and the matter is at the investigation stage and many 2 more such facts are yet to be investigated as the petitioner has committed the offence at large scale and the matter is at the investigation stage and having nature of the offence and the facts that the various computers, forged documents i.e. national permit, driving licences have been recovered from the petitioner. The possibility cannot be ruled out that during the investigation many more facts are likely to be discovered. In my view, it is not a fit case to release the petitioner on bail. The bail application filed by the petitioner under section 439 Cr.P.C. is, therefore, dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to move a fresh bail application after filing of the challan. [H.R.PANWAR],J. m.asif/-