^ HIGH CQURT QF JUDICATUFE CHHATTISGARH: BILASnjR DIVISIONBENeH CORAM: HON'BLESHRIS.R.NAYAK.CJ & HON'BLESHRID.R.DESHMUKIiJ. APPUCANT NON-APPELLANT RESPONDENTS Misc.ADpeal N0, 169 QF 2006 The Orientat Insurance Com. Ltd., Through : Branch <^Rce, h4ain Road, Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Smt. Subhadra Bal, W/o. Shri Shyam Singh, Aged about 45 yeare. R/o. ViUage-Kuwenar, Caste-Gond. Tehsil- Bijapur. District-Dantewada (CG) 2. Shyam Singh Korram, S/o. Gopal Singh Konram, Occupation -Head Constabto, Police Station - Dantewada, Disfrict - Dantewada (CG) 3. Ramaiya, S/o. BoiUa, Aged about 27 yeare, R/o. Vitlage- Dugofi, Post Bijapur, District- Dantewada (C.G.) 4. Shaitendra Siriflh Bhadoria, S/o. R.S. Bhactora, R/o. VTillage - Nemada. TehsU - Bijapur, District- Dantewada (C.G.) Present: Shri N.K. MaMya, teamed counsel for the appeNant. ORALORDER [Passed on 21st February, 2008) The following oral order of th®Court was passed by S.R.NAYAK.CJ: The only ground urged by the teamed counsel for the appeHant- Insurance Company is that the deceased was traveling in the vehtete as a gratuitous passenger and. therefore, the Nability to pay compensation coukl not have been fastened on the Insurance Company. This specffic plea is considered by the MAQT in paragraphs 17 and 18 of the award. The Tribunal, as a matter of fact, found that the deceased was accompanying the "z- goods as a coolie engaged by the owner ofthe goods. We have perused the findings recorded by the MACT. The factual findings recorded by the MACT could not be condemned for perversity. No ground is made out to entertajn theappeal. The appeat is, therefore, dismissed. Nocosts. ?? Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge