IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 14TH OCTOBER 2010 / 22ND ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 31469 of 2010(G) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- HAMEED.B,S/O.MOIDEEN KUNHI,BADRIYA MANZIL,MOGRAL PUTHUR POST, KASARAGOD. BY ADVS. SMT.T.D.RAJALAKSHMI, SRI.R.SREEHARI RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA,REP.BY THE SECRETARY, INDUSTRIES (A) DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR,CIVIL STATION, KASARAGOD -671 121. 3. GEOLOGIST,DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY,DISTRICT OFFICE, CIVL STATION, KASARAGOD- 671 121. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/10/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 31469 of 2010 G ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 14th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner challenges Ext.P5. Ext.P5 is only a show cause notice. As it is open to the petitioner to file objections to Ext.P5, the writ petition challenging the show cause notice is premature. Therefore, I am not inclined to admit the writ petition. Writ petition, therefore, will stand disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to file his objections, if any, to Ext.P5 and directing the third respondent to dispose of the matter untrammeled by the directions issued by the District Collector. In the meanwhile, the stock of sand, if any, available with the petitioner shall not be seized on the basis of the show cause notice issued. It is clarified that this judgment will not enable the petitioner to appropriate or dispose of the sand, pending adjudication of the matter by the third respondent. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks