IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Revision No. 2950 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.11.2009. Devinder Gupta ....Petitioner Versus Central Bureau of Investigation, Sector 30, Chandigarh. ...Respondent CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Ms. Charanjeet Kaur, Advocate for Ms. B.C. Bitta, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJESH BINDAL J. **** Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she has been instructed by the counsel who had filed the present petition to appear. However, she only knows about the fact that the prayer in the petition is for release of the tainted money. She is not aware of the fact as to whether the convict Ravi Kant Pawar had filed any appeal against his conviction or not. As in the impugned order passed by the Court below on 18.8.2009, it was observed that even the period for filing the appeal against the conviction has not elapsed so far when the petitioner has filed application for release of money. As the counsel is not able to apprise the Court about true facts of the case, I have no option but to dismiss the present petition. Dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) 11.11.2009 JUDGE Reema