IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-14715 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 18, 2010 Ram Tirath .....Petitioner v. The State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.V.K.Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of direction to respondent nos.2 and 3 to further investigate the matter and to add the names of respondent nos.4 to 6 in FIR No.41, dated 30.3.2010, Annexure P3, and to take action against all the accused named in the aforesaid FIR including respondent nos.4 to 6. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully. A perusal of FIR, Annexure P3, shows that though it has been mentioned that Kanungo and Patwari accompanied co-accused to conduct demarcation, however, no other role has been attributed to them. Similarly in original complaint, Annexure P2, allegedly made by the complainant before Deputy Superintendent of Police, Baghapurana, it has been simply mentioned that Sukhdev Singh, Kanungo reached there and informed that he was to carry out demarcation. Hence, FIR has been rightly registered against the other accused. Respondent nos.4 to 6 were only acting in discharge of their official duties to demarcate the khasra numbers. Hence, in view of these facts there is not merit in the present petition. Hence the same is, hereby, dismissed. 18.5.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge