wp11681.10 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.11681 OF 2010 Radhakishan s/o Baslingappa Jamshete, R/o-Panchayat Samiti, Sonpeth, Tq-Sonpeth, Dist-Parbhani. ...PETITIONER. VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32, 2) The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Parbhani, 3) The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Sonpeth, Tq-Sonpeth, Dist-Parbhani, 4) The Block Education Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Sonpeth, Tq-Sonpeth, Dist-Parbhani. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri.H.I. Pathan Advocate for Petitioner. Shri.V.B. Ghatge, AGP for Respondent No.1. Shri.V.V. Bhavthankar Advocate for Respondent No.2. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND T.V. NALAWADE, JJ. DATE : 12TH OCTOBER, 2011. wp11681.10 2 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. The Petitioner challenges suspension order dated 6th December, 2010 issued by Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Parbhani. The counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner was not paid even subsistence allowance in accordance with law. 3. On this issue, Shri. Bhavthankar, learned counsel for Zilla Parishad, called for instructions. The counsel placed on record a communication issued by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Parbhani. Shri. Bhavthankar, learned counsel, on instructions, submits that the Petitioner was getting subsistence allowance at the rate of 50% till the end of September, 2011 and from 11th October, 2011 wp11681.10 3 the Petitioner started getting subsistence allowance at the rate of 75%. Learned counsel for Zilla Parishad submits that in view of the order of status quo passed by this Court, the Respondent Zilla Parishad had taken abundant precaution in not initiating departmental enquiry against the Petitioner. 4. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for Respondent Zilla Parishad, the Petition could be disposed of. The Respondent Zilla Parishad Authorities are entitled to hold departmental enquiry and complete the same expeditiously. 5. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for Zilla Parishad, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. [T.V. NALAWADE, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] asb/OCT11