J-- fh IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR IC.&) W.P. (S) N0. ^'2-c>^> /2011 PETETIONERS 1; .\^'^ ^^x^^- ^sc^ ^y^^' yy ^ Shailendra Kumar Sahu, age.6 about 30 years, S/o Shri Bhaiyaram Sahu, Ophthalmic Assistant, Primary Health Centre Sampur, Makdi, bistt. Jagdalpur ( Baster ) (C.G.) Vinod Kumar Sahu, aged about 28 years, S/o Shri Ramsahay Sahu, Ophthalmic Assistant, Primary Health Centre Karpavand, Bakawand, Distt. Jagdalpur (Baster) (C.6.) Anil Kumar, aged about 24 years, S/o Shri Sukhchand, Ophthatmic Assistant, Primary Health Centre Keshkal, Distt. Jagdalpur ( Baster ) (C.6.) Sukdhar Ram Netam, aged about 30 years, S/o Shri Charan Singh Netam, Ophthalmic Assistant, Primar-y Health Centre Lubhha, Makdi, Distt. Jagdalpur ( Baster ) (C.6.) Dev Narayan Baghel, aged about 30 years, S/o Shri Santram Baghel, Ophthalmic Assistant, Primary Health Centre Badedonger, ,^\ ?^^^^^%^KK^:^; J* 2-. ^' RESPONDENTS ^8. Farasgaon, Distt. Jagdalpur ( Baster) (C.G.) Mohan Dugga, aged about 24 years S/o Shri Dularuram Ougga, Ophthalmic Assistant, Primary Health Centre Chipawand, Kondagaon, Distt. Jagdalpur ( Baster) (C.G.) Smt. Yogita Nag @ Yogita Sahu, aged about 25 years, S/o Tilakram Nag, Ophthalmic Assistant, Primary Health Centre Baster, Distt. Jagdalpur ( Baster ) (C.6.) Tilakram Nag, aged about 29 years, S/o Late Sukhiram Nag, Ophthalmic Assistant, Primary Health Centre Kolchur, Baster Distt. Jagdalpur ( Baster ) (C.6.) Deepa Rajput, aged about 27 years, D/o Mahendra Singh Rajput, Ophthalmic Assistant, Primary Health Centre Kachnar, Bakawand, Distt. Jagdalpur ( Baster ) (C.6.) VERSUS ;1. State of ChhattiS9arh Through Secretary, Department of Medical & Family Welfare, &.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.) ^ ?. Q 2. The Director, Health Services, Directorate, State of Chhattisgarh Raipur (C.6.) 3. Chief Medical & Health Officer, District Baster, Jagdalpur (C.6.) sa* WRTT PETETCON UNDER ARTECLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INNA iiSlSl w' i ie^y ^y A SE : HOBE'ELE 3WR. JUSTICE PRiT!NKER DIWAKBR. vcrsus ShaUendra Kiunar Sab.u Others Statc of Cbliattisgarh & Ofhers Shri K.S.Pawar, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Bhaskar Pyasi, P.L. for the State. (01.12.2011) Contention of Shri Pawar, counsel for the petitioners are that the petitioners are workiag as Opthalmic Assistaiits siace 2006 aad fhe case of similarly placed persons is already pendiag befoic the State Goveram.ent for consMeration vide Annexure P-3 & P-4. He sutoinits that the case of fhe petitioners laay also be directed to be considered in fhe light ofAluiexures P-3 & P-4 aad the aufhorily inay be directed to take steps imniediately in relation to the service condition of0phffaalm.ie Assistant. State counsel subinits tbat let the petitioners approach the competeut aufhorit}- by filing proper representation giving reference to Aruiexure P-3 & P-4 and fhe saiae would be considered iu accordance with law. Accordingly, fhe petition is disposed of witli a direction to the petitioners to file fresh representation befoi^ the concemed authority and ia the' eventuality of fIUng aay such repiesentation fhe same would be decided by fh.e concemed aufhonty in accordance witfa law. It is, aiade clear that this court has not expressed any opinion L on fhe inerits of fhe case and the authority concerued would be at liberty to decide fhe representation strictly in accordauce wirli IEW. Sd/- Judge -Hws/^