1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 51 OF 2006 IN PETITION NO. 221 OF 2005 Ranjit Harnam Kewalramani. ... Plaintiff. V/s. Shyamsunder Hiranandani & Anr. ... Defendants. Mr. K.T. Kukreja for the Plaintiff. Mr. Kharawala for Defendant 1. Mr. S.K. Gurnani i/b. K.T. Vejhurani for Defendant 2. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATED : 07th DECEMBER 2009. P.C. :- In the Testamentary Suit, the Parties state that they have settled the matter. 2. The Defendants/Caveators do not desire to press the challenge to the Will on the ground that it is not genuine and valid. They withdraw their caveats and confirm that the Will is valid and is the last Will and Testament of the deceased. Further, they confirm that it is duly executed. 3. Since the parties are related to each other, in addition, they put an end to their other disputes. Thus, beneficiaries under the Will have agreed to share the estate in terms of the Will and as per the entitlement thereof. 2 4. The terms recording all this are duly signed by the Plaintiff and the Defendants so also their Advocate. Parties are present in Court. They confirm the arrangement recorded and state that they have willingly and on their own put an end to the dispute between the family. 5. Since I am satisfied that the disputes are fully settled, I take the Consent Terms on record. They are marked ‘X’ for identification. 6. There shall be an order in terms of the Consent Terms. Since the Will is now accepted by all parties, Office to proceed to issue a Probate in terms thereof. The Suit and Probate Petition are disposed off accordingly, with no order as to costs. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.)