IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10298 of 2011 Md. Imbrahim Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3/ 07.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that differences in between the parties are for land and the alleged injury caused by this petitioner though is on head but without any repetition and simple in nature. Theft is ornamental for which also petitioner remained in custody since 01.02.2011. Hence, his prayer for bail is allowed. Let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Madhubani in connection with Sakari P.S. Case No. 12 of 2011, G.R. No. 198 of 2011. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)