IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30633 of 2009 BAUDHA KAHAR @ BAUDHA KOHAR & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.33770 of 2009 ARJUN RAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 15-09-2009 Both the bail applications arise out of the same P.S.case and as such they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. None of these petitioners have been named in the F.I.R. as registered under section 302 and allied sections of the Indian Penal Code read with section 27 of the Arms Act in connection with Nokha P.S. Case No. 15 of 2008 . Submission of the counsel for the petitioners is that even in the so-called protest petition, petitioners have not been named and similarly situated other accused persons have already been granted bail by this Court as indicated in paragraph-8 of the bail application of Baudha Kahar @ Baudha Kohar. The petitioners are in jail custody since 25.02.2009, 28.01.2009 and 16.06.2009, respectively. In the above facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, namely, Baudha Kahar @ Baudha Kohar, Lalasu Ram ( Cr. Misc. No. 30633 of 2009) and Arjun Ram ( Cr. Misc. No. 33770 of 2009) , be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial - 2 - Magistrate, Sasaram, Rohtas in Nokha P.S. Case No. 15 of 2008. One of the sureties shall be executed by the close blood relation of the petitioners and other one by an elected representative of the area. It is further directed that the petitioners shall cooperate in the trial. BTiwary/ ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J )