1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.3304 OF 2005 Nathuji Jittuji Kaikade .vs. Lokmat Marathi Daily and 2 ors. WRIT PETITION NO.3330 OF 2005. Rajeshwar Madhukar Tangade ..vs.. Lokmat Marathi Daily Nagpur and ors. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's directions and Registrar's orders. Order. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram: C.L.PANGARKAR,J. Dated : 15th JUNE, 2009. Heard Shri Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Shri Marpakwar learned counsel for the respondent. Mr.Marpakwar submits before this court that in view of the decision of this court in W.P.No.3319 of 2005 and three others petitions as well in W.P. No.3321 of 2005, these two petitions in fact, do not survive. Mr.Thakur appearing for the petitioner, however, objects 2 and submits that the petitions do not become infructuous. After having heard and after having read the order passed by this court in the above writ petitions, it is apparent that the controversy as involved in these writ petitions has already been decided by the court in the above writ petitions. In view of this, these writ petitions, in fact, have become infructuous and they are dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE. chute