WPCRL No. 135 of 2011 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon. V. K. Bist, J. Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate, present for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. Govt. Advocate, present for the State. Mrs. Neetu Singh, Advocate, present for respondent No. 3 Amjad Ali. Learned counsel for the parties state that petitioner No. 1 Smt. Gulshan Jahan is presently living with her father respondent No. 3 Amjad Ali against whom she had alleged in this petition that she has threat to her life and liberty, after getting married to petitioner No. 2. However, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that when the petitioners went to seek protection on 19.03.2011, in compliance of order dated 08.03.2011 passed by this court, she was made to join her father’s company. Thereafter, petitioner No. 2 appears to have filed the Habeas Corpus Petition No. 03 of 2011, in which Gulshan Jahan (petitioner No. 1 of this petition) was called before the court, and the habeas corpus bench observed that since she is willing to live with her father, she was allowed to live with him. In the above circumstances, this writ petition has practically become infructuous. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (V.K. Bist, J.) (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 04.04.2011 HN