THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM CRP NO.934 OF 2010 21-10-2010 Between: Shaik Bebijan ..Petitioner Vs. Bathula Chi8nnaiah son of Yerraiah and others …Respondents. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM CRP NO.934 OF 2010 ORAL ORDER In the context of the relief sought in this revision, it is disposed of at the stage of admission. The revision is filed aggrieved by the docket order dated 10-08- 2009 passed by the Principal District Judge, Ongole in E.A.No. of 2009 in MVOP No.41 of 2001. The petitioner filed the MVOP for compensation on the death of her husband in a road accident. The Tribunal passed an award for Rs.2,56,500/-, 50% of which is to be paid by the 2nd respondent and 50% by the 3rd respondent, the owner of the vehicle and the insurer respectively. The amount was deposited. The petitioner was permitted to withdraw Rs.33,245/- as per orders in E.A.No.583 of 206 dated 05-06-2006 and the balance amount was ordered to be invested in a Fixed Deposit. Balance amount of Rs.1,41,265/- was kept in a Fixed Depot and it is stated in the report of the Chairman, MACT-cum-Principal District Judge, Ongole dated 03-06-2010 that the deposit has matured on 09- 05-2009. In a subsequent application of the petitioner (EA No.243 of 2007) filed seeking withdrawal of the balance amount with accrued interest, the court below passed an order dated 24.02.2007 calling upon the petitioner to produce proof of her relationship with the deceased and of the death of her husband which was the ground pleaded for seeking to withdraw the balance amount. However, on 10- 08-2009 by the order impugned, in EA No.1426 of 2009 the petitioner’s application for seeking withdrawal of the balance amount was rejected on the ground that the earlier direction dated 24-02-2007 has not been complied with, viz., production of proof of her relationship with the deceased. It is stated in this revision by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner had complied with the directions and had produced the relevant affidavits disclosing her relationship with the deceased. In any event since it is reported by the Chairman, MACT- cum-PDJ, Ongole that the tenure of the Fixed Deposit has expired by 09-05-2009, the petitioner shall be entitled to withdraw the amount deposited. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly allowed. The order dated 10-08-2009 in E.A.No.1426 of 2009 is set aside and the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-Principal District Judge, Ongole is directed to permit the petitioner to withdraw the balance amount together with accrued interest in deposit, on the petitioner furnishing proof of her identity. No order as to costs. ________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J 21st OCTOBER 2010 TSNR