IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 5297 of 2008 Decided on: 08.09.2010 Ravinder Kumar Gupta and others. …Petitioners. Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board. …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioners. : None. For the respondent. : Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : The petitioners have already made various representations placed on record for the redressal of their grievances. However, the same have not been decided till date by the respondent- Board. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the Secretary of the respondent-Board to decide the representations placed on record by the petitioners individually/through their association by passing a speaking order, within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment. Petitioners, if interested, shall also be heard in 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No -2- person and for that purpose, actual date notices shall be sent to them. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge September 8, 2010 (K. Attri)