1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5444 OF 2009 Beejoy Balaram & Ors. .. Petitioners. Vs. Bharatiya Bhavan Co-operative Hsg. Society Ltd. .. Respondents. Mr.Y.E.Mooman for the petitioners. Mr.Y.R.Naik with Prakash Naik for the respondents. Coram: D.B. BHOSALE, J. Dated : 24TH AUGUST, 2009 P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This writ petition arises from the orders passed by the courts below on the application filed by the petitioners at Exhibit-5, seeking injunction restraining the respondent-society from distributing redevelopment funds to the members. In short, pending hearing and final disposal of the dispute, the petitioners have prayed for stay of the resolution passed by the Special General Body meeting held on 13.11.2005. The resolution reads thus: “Resolved that the distribution of redevelopment proceeds among members be done on the following basis: (a) Allocated part be divided proportionate to the area of the flats occupied 2 by each member with due weightage for balconies/varandah and garages ? (b) Remaining be divided equally among all 37 members, where “Allocated Part” would mean, that part of the total proceeds of redevelopment representing the total area occupied by all members with due weightage for balconies/varandah and garages ?” 3. I have perused the impugned orders and more particularly the judgment and order passed by the Co-operative Appellate Court. For the reasons recorded therein, in my opinion, they deserve no interference by this court in exercise of the writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence the petition is disposed of by the following direction: The Co-operative Court No.II, Mumbai, shall dispose of the dispute bearing No.CC.II/147/2006 as expeditiously as possible and preferrably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of this order. The parties are directed to co- operate for disposal of the dispute within the time stipulated. The distribution of redevelopment funds would be, however, subject to the outcome of the dispute. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)