1 srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1585 OF 2009 Sunil s/o Madhukar Khot ..Appllicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents Mr. Mahendra R Jhakde for the Applicant. Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the Respondents. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA, J. DATE : 2nd July, 2009 P.C. 1 Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused and learned APP for the State. Earlier bail application was rejected on 27th June, 2008 by reasoned order. 2 The present application moved on the footing, the trial is not being proceeded with. Now the trial is on. 3 Under the above circumstances, the ground on which application is based does not survive or exists. If the trial is on, it is not necessary to entertain bail application at this stage otherwise it will delay trial. The offences punishable are under section 302, 341, 342, 364, 323, 147 to 149 read with section 4, 25 of the Arms Act. It is also necessary to see the gravity of the offences. Considering the gravity of the offences, I do not think this is a fit case for grant bail in favour of the applicant-accused. Even otherwise there is no change in fact situation warranting reconsideration. 4 In the result, no case is made out for grant of bail. However, the trial court is directed to try the same expediently without granting any time. 5 In the result, application is rejected. (V.C.DAGA, J.)