IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.11384 of 2010 Date of Decision : July 01, 2010. Ashwani Kumar .....Petitioner versus The Punjab State Were-Housing Corporation Bank and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Sandeep Jasuja, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner was a Godown Assistant in the Punjab State Warehousing Corporation (for short `the Corporation'). Vide an order dated 14.9.2004 (Annexure P-1), he was disqualified from the pensionary benefits besides the recovery of loss caused to the Corporation. Against the afore-stated order, the petitioner preferred a departmental appeal on 30.9.2004 (Annexure P-2) which is stated to be still pending consideration. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and keeping in view the fact that as per the petitioner's allegations, his appeal is kept pending for the last almost six years, I deem it appropriate to dispose of C.W.P.No .11384 of 2010 2 this writ petition with a direction to the Appellate Authority/Board of Directors of the Corporation to convene their meeting and decide the petitioner's appeal, if not already decided, by passing a speaking order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order Ordered accordingly. Dasti. July 01, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE