(^5^7 / SMGLE BENCH ^ IN THE HrcB COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASFUR Writ Petition (S) No. ^ W /2010 Petitioners ::: / 1. /-2. ....^ ,.--"^'... ,0^:/ ' ^%y ^•4^-y ^•''^'.A?Y .<J",.--' .rN7 ^7 cy./ Respondents ::: Rajesh Choudhary, Age 33 years^ Son of Shri K.P.Choudhary, Resident ofSantoshi Ward No. 27, Jagdalpur, Bastar (C.G.). Sunil Pilley, Age 40 years, Son of Shri K.Gopal Pilley, Resident of Anukul Deo Ward, Awas Plot Karkapal, near Homegourad Camp, Jagdalpur (C.G.). 3. Rizwan, Age 35 years, Son of M.B.Ahmad, resident of A.B.Bajpai Ward, Dharampura, Jagdalpur (C.G.) ^ 4. Khageshwar Pandey, Age 41 years, Son of Sadanand Pandey, resident of Rajendra Nagar Ward, Jagdalpur (C.G.) 5. Abdul Sahid Khan, Age 39 years, Son ofAbdul Raphid Khan, resident ofRajendra Nagar Ward^ Jagdalpur (C.G.) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Forest Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Priiicipal Chief Conservator of Forest (PCCF), Chhattisgarh Raipur. 3. Forest Conservator Jagdalpur, Circle Jagdalpur Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2260F THE CONSTITUTIQN QFINDIA ^S-I ^ *I(*ICTI ^»^n<!h ~5^ "4l^l<ri<4, ^Tll'M^Ko, [c«r(l-H*j,< ^^...W.-..&..to.....^....^^ ^TI^T TR15F (yii^<^) 3T^T ^T f<'lJch W^ CT^T'^JW 's ^nw^f^^y^r SB : HOrBLB MR. JUSTICB PRJITINKER DEWAKBR 31.08.2010 Shri Sachin Snigh Rajput, Shri Paiikaj Shrivastava, P\ tb,e tie At tiie outset, couiisel for grievance of the petitioBer is to| No.2 aa.d tlierefore tlie petiti.or)€ siiitable representatioii before prays for deciding tlie reprcsent4tioB expeditiously. State counsel has no obied is behig made by tlie petitioners In the facts aad circunistaAces QT€permitted to wi.thdraw the pet In th.e eventualiU7- -of niakm.g arj petittoners, it' i.s expected that accordauce with law. tfc> <=»ii<<f<n<fl<i'W:T?it ^f fe^ <F?i^s< ^^tfima^r ^ounsel for the petitioners. L. for tlie State. ic petitioners su.bmi.ts th.a.t tli.e be considered by respondent ars may be permitted to file respon.dents. He however, tioii so filed by fh.e petitioners |;ion ifaiiy such represe.uta.tion the respondeuts. ofthe ca.se, th.e petitioners lition with the aibresaid libeit\r. |.y su.ch. represeiitation by tlie b.e sanie woiild be decid.ed.in Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge