1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Civil Application No.1581 of 2010 In RAST No.2700/10 In SA No.119/1993. _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _______________________|_______________________________________ 1. Heard counsel. 2. The delay of 34 days is condoned in the interest of justice and for the reasons stated in the application. 3. So far as Review Application is concerned, it may be stated that the earlier advocate Mr.P.V.Mandlik, has not filed the application. He has given no objection. However, considering the observations in "Shobha Bajirao Damodhar Vs. Triratna Krida and Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Akola and others" 2009 (1) Mh.L.J. 979, the tendency of litigants to change the advocates for the purpose of filing applications needs to be deprecated and the ground stated in the application do not come within the ambit of Order 47 Rule 1 of the C.P.C. Hence, the petition for review is dismissed. (V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) Dt.23.02.2010. asp/office/Ca1581.10