:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 27 OF 2006 CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 27 OF 2006 CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 27 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2930 OF 2001 WRIT PETITION NO. 2930 OF 2001 WRIT PETITION NO. 2930 OF 2001 Mukundrao R. Bhamre & Ors. ..Petitioners versus Satana Municipal Council & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Sachin Chavan i/b. Mr. S. S. Kulkarni for the Petitioners. Mrs. P. H. Kantharia, APP for the Respondents - State. Mr. Vinayak Shete h/f. Ms. P. Kamani for the Respondent No. 10. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and S. A. BOBDE, JJ. S. A. BOBDE, JJ. S. A. BOBDE, JJ. DATE : 8TH FEBRUARY, 2008. DATE : 8TH FEBRUARY, 2008. DATE : 8TH FEBRUARY, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This contempt petition is pending from 2002. Earlier Civil Contempt Petition No. 246 of 2002 was filed. Thereafter by an order dated 31.8.2006 the Civil Contempt Petition was ordered to be converted into Criminal Contempt Petition No. 27 of 2006. 2. Counsel appearing for the petitioner sought an adjournment. Since the matter is pending from 2002, we perused the record and also heard learned :2: counsel for the respondent No. 10, who is present. 3. An order was passed by this court directing that the new rates of water taxes shall be made applicable from the date on which the notification was issued i.e. on 5.7.1999. Thereafter on an application, this order was modified on 5.11.2001 by which it was directed that the new rates of water taxes shall apply from the date on which the notification pursuant to the resolution of 1999 was issued. Accordingly the order of 5.7.2001 was modified. These matters were reported in the press. 4. We have gone through the press reports, we do not find that there has been any deliberate attempt to report the proceedings of the court incorrectly or create any impression to bring the administration of justice into disrepute. This contempt has also been filed without taking permission from the Advocate General. Since we see that there is no deliberate attempt to make any contempt of this court, we discharge the Rule and close the matter. (BILAL NAZKI, J.) (BILAL NAZKI, J.) (BILAL NAZKI, J.) :3: (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.)