IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-16232 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 04.07.2011 Om Parkash ...Petitioner Versus Rishipal and another ..Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. N.D. Achint, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rahul Deswal, Advocate for the complainant. Ms. Shalini Attri, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. ..... RAJESH BINDAL, J. It is not disputed that a civil litigation between the parties was already pending, when the private complaint was filed in the Court pertaining to the same transaction. It is stated to be regarding sale of property. The petitioner has been summoned by the learned court below to face trial on the private complaint filed by respondent No.1. Considering the fact that the civil litigation was already pending when the complaint was filed in Court, the petitioner is directed to appear before the learned court below within one week from today and furnish his bail bonds to the satisfaction of the learned court below. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 04.07.2011 sharmila