IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.725 of 2011. Umesh Prasad s/o Ram Prasad Mahato R/o village Lodipur Chak P.O. G.B.Kendua P.S. Sirdala District Nawada…..Appellant. Versus 1.The State Of Bihar. Through Commissioner and Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna. 2.Member, District Teachers Employment Authority, Nawada. 3.Commissioner Magadh Division, Gaya. 4.District Magistrate, Nawada. 5.District Superintendent of Education, Nawada. 6.B.D.O.,Nawada. 4.Block Development Officer, Nawada. 7.Block Education Extension Officer, Nawada. 8.Panchayat Secretary null Gram Panchayat, Punthar, Hammidpur Bara,P.O.Hasapur, Anchal Narhat, District Nawada. 9.Principal, Primary School, Hammidpur Bara, P.O.Hasapur Anchal Narhat District Nawada. 10.All India Education Society (AIES) Through Principal David Hair College Correspondence Kolkata, Markentile Building, Block B/9, Lal Bazar Street, Kolkata – 700001. …… Respondents. ----------- 4. 18.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the State. The consistent case of the respondent-authorities is that the appellant/writ-petitioner obtained appointment to the post of Panchayat teacher on the basis of two years’ training from an Institution called as ‘David Hair College of Correspondence, Kolkata’ which is not a recognized institution by the State of Bihar for imparting two years’ training to the teachers so as to make them eligible for appointment to the post of teachers in the State of Bihar. We wanted to examine any decision or notification or letter of the State Government which could support the case of the appellant that the said institution is recognized by the State of Bihar for imparting two years’ training to the teachers. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the State of Bihar has examined the decree issued by 2 153 institutions which were found to be forged but the name of David Hair College of Correspondence of Kolkata is not mentioned in the list of those 153 unrecognized institutions. In our view, the aforesaid submission is misconceived. We find no material to come to the conclusion that the training certificate of the appellant is from a College or institution recognized by the State of Bihar. Hence, we find no merit in this appeal. It is, accordingly, dismissed. Jay/ (Shiva Kirti Singh,J) (Shivaji Pandey, J)