RSA No.111/1997. 10.01.2008 Present: Mr Romesh Verma, Advocate for the appellant. Mr J.L.Kashyap, Advocate for LRs of respondent No.1. CMP(M) Nos.965 & 964 of 2007: CMP(M) No.965 of 2007 is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay in filing the application under Order 22 Rules 3 and 4. Reply is not intended to be filed. The application is supported by affidavit of Sanjeev Kumar. For the reasons stated in the application, I am satisfied that there are sufficient grounds for condonation of delay in filing the application. Accordingly, delay is condoned and application stands disposed of. CMP(M) No.964 of 2007 is an application filed under Order 22 Rules 3 and 4 C.P.C. for bringing on record legal representatives of Foju Ram, which is allowed. The legal representatives of respondent / cross- objector Foju Ram, mentioned in Para-2 of the application, are ordered to be brought on record. Necessary correction be carried out in the memo of parties. CMP(M) No.8 of 2008: This is an application for bringing on record legal representatives of respondent Foju Ram, who died on 26.7.2007. Mr.Romesh Verma, at the very outset, has submitted that the application is not properly drafted and is also not on proper format. He has submitted that the error has crept inadvertently but the application is for bringing on record legal representatives of Foju Ram after setting aside abatement and …2… condoning the delay in filing the application. He has also submitted that in fact cross objection has been filed in the appeal and in the cross objection, application has already been filed for bringing on record legal representatives of Foju Ram. No doubt, the application is not properly drafted and is not on proper format but the fact remains that application has been filed for bringing on record legal representatives of Foju Ram after setting aside abatement of the appeal and condoning the delay. It has been submitted that the applicant had no knowledge regarding the death of Foju Ram. She came to know about the death of Foju Ram only when application for bringing on record legal representatives of Foju Ram was filed in the cross objection and immediately thereafter she filed this application. The application is supported by affidavit of Ishwari Devi. Reply is not intended to be filed. I am satisfied that the applicant has shown sufficient cause for filing the application. Hence, delay in filing the application is condoned, abatement of appeal is set aside and legal representatives of Foju Ram, mentioned in Para-2 of the application, are ordered to be brought on record. Amended memo of parties is already on record. January 10, 2008(soni) ( Kuldip Singh ), J.