IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50704 of 2006 1.YASH PAUL AGGARWAL son of late Sohan Lal Agarwal, R/o Bombay Hardware, Exhibition Roal, P.S.-Gandhi Maidan, Patna. Versus 1.STATE OF BIHAR 2.Bhasho Singh @ Bhaso Pahalwan son of late Jagdeo Singh, resident of village-Pandarak, P.S.-Pandarak, Dist.-Patna. ----------- 16. 17.3.2010. Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Mr.B.P.Singh, learned APP for the State. While invoking inherent jurisdiction of this court under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner, who is an accused in Complaint Case No.278C of 2006 for the offence under section 406 of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for quashing of the order of cognizance dated 8.9.2006/11.9.2006 and 26.9.2006. I have perused the complaint petition. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party no.2, while placing the complaint petition, submits that contents of the complaint petition itself categorically indicate commission of cognizable offence. He further submits that there is no error in the impugned order. I am also of the view that there is no error in the impugned order. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)