IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.26869-M of 2009 Date of Decision:7.9.2010 M/s Atma Tube Products Ltd. and another .... Petitioners Versus M/s Avery India Ltd. .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. V.K. Sachdeva, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rahul Chhatwal, Advocate for the respondent. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) On 12.7.2010, it was brought to the notice of this Court that the matter has been compromised. However, the matter was adjourned as the complainant had not withdrawn the complaint as yet. Today, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent- complainant states at the bar that the complaint stands withdrawn. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent-complainant, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 7.9.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE