Civil Writ Petition No. 17330 of 2009 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Writ Petition No. 17330 of 2009 Date of Decision: 12.11.2009 Surat Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and Others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Naresh Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Present writ petition has been filed seeking quashing of the impugned order dated 24.9.2009 (Annexure P15 passed by the Chief Administrator, Greater Mohali Area Development Authority, S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali. In pursuance of the directions issued by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No. 6675 of 2009 decided on 4.5.2009 (Annexure P14), the Chief Administrator, Greater Mohali Area Development Authority, S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali, has held petitioner not entitled to residential plot on the ground that petitioner has failed to establish that he is original resident of village Lambian. The Chief Administrator noticed that as per own admission of the petitioner, he was resident of House No. 1067, Sector 42, Chandigarh. Thus, it was held that petitioner is not entitled to allotment of the residential plot. The Chief Administrator also took into consideration the fact that the land of the Civil Writ Petition No. 17330 of 2009 2 petitioner, which was acquired, was having built-up shops, therefore, in lieu of same, for allotment of a commercial booth, letter of intent has been issued to the applicant. The policy has been annexed with the present petition as Annexure P1. It specifically states that the Rehabilitation Scheme has been devised for the original residents/original land owners of village Lambian. Therefore, there is no infirmity in the impugned order (Annexure P15) passed by the Chief Administrator as the same is in consonance with the policy (Annexure P1). Counsel for the petitioner has given various instances to say that those persons who were allotted residential plots were not the original owners of the land/residents of village Lambian. In the writ jurisdiction, this Court will not hold a fact finding enquiry. Suffice it to say that a wrong committed by the Authority vest no right in the petitioner to seek allotment of the plot in contravention of the policy (Annexure P1). There is no merit in the present writ petition. Hence, the same is dismissed. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge November 12, 2009 “DK”