THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED C.R.P.No.3341 of 2010 ORDER: The respondent/plaintiff/D.Hr., filed O.S.No.2919 of 2000 on the file of the III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam, against the petitioners/defendants/J.Drs., for declaration and obtained decree in her favour that she is the absolute owner of ‘B’ schedule property i.e., house bearing D.No.38-36-92/1. The appeal preferred by the petitioners herein was also confirmed. For execution of the decree, the respondent filed E.P.No.65 of 2009. During the pendency of the said E.P., the petitioners filed unnumbered E.A. of 2010 under Section 47 CPC seeking police aid as there was obstruction from them for execution of the decree. By the order, dated 28.06.2010, the said application was rejected. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners filed the present revision. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the material on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the Court below ought to have seen that there is no house bearing No.38-36-92/1 as per the schedule property mentioned in the decree, and therefore, the decree is not executable against them and they are residents of the house bearing D.No.38-36-92, Shivanagar, Marripalem, Visakhapatnam. 4. Inasmuch as the appeal filed against the judgment and decree, dated 01.10.2007, passed in O.S.No.2919 of 2000 was confirmed by the appellate Court, the execution of decree in E.P. proceedings cannot be questioned by way of the revision on the ground that the petitioners/J.Drs., are not residing in the schedule property mentioned in the decree. Therefore, I do not find any merit in this revision. 5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J Date: 13.08.2010 sj