IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7808 of 2011 RIMMI KUMARI Versus RAMAWATI DEVI & ORS. ----------- 2. 10.05.2011 After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and going through the order impugned, it is evident that to recall the order and to proceed ex-parte has been rejected by the trial Court. It has been disbelieved and it is a settled law that as far as possible parties may be allowed to contest the case and defend their right properly. This proposition has been settled in the case setting aside ex-party orders. The reasons should be given due weightage and merely the provisions under Order 9 Rule 7 provides that the Court shall allow the hearing to the parties on that cost. Therefore, the order is set aside and the trial Court is directed to reconsider the application of the petitioner in accordance with the provisions of Order 9 Rule 7, and after giving full opportunity to the parties. The petition is disposed of. Anand Kr. ( Prakash Chandra Verma, J.)