1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.:3534 OF 2011 *** The President, Rural Water Supply Committee VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Ors *** Mr. Patnurkar V.D., Advocate for Petitioner *** 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner. We have perused the prayers made in the writ petition. 2. Having regard to the main prayer in the writ petition, it is clear that such prayer cannot be entertained in writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. 3. Dismissal of the writ petition, however, shall not preclude the petitioner from taking appropriate remedy if any available in law for redressal of his grievance. [S. B. DESHMUKH, J.] [D. B. BHOSALE, J.] Dated:25/07/2011. ans/3534