IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26352 of 2010 MAHENDRA PRASAD son of late Tetar Mehto -------Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 24.8.2010 Heard Learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that certainly there was some talk to marry but could not be finalized due to act of the complainant. Now his daughter is married elsewhere. No question arises about any gift nor given in any ceremony performed in connection with marriage. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Gaya, in connection with Complaint Case no.515 of 2009 ,subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh,J )