IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 1115 of 2011 Decided on: 10.3.2011 Jeewan Lata …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and ors. …….Respondents Coram : The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge For the petitioner: Mr. Himmat Negi, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G with Mr. Ankus Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral): The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:- “(i) That the respondents may kindly be directed to grant regular appointment to the petitioner as Beldar w.e.f. the date of joining as daily waged Beldar, i.e. 26.6.208.” 2. A similar issue was considered by this Court in CWP No. 2466 of 2010, titled Hem Raj vs. State of H.P. and ors. along with connected matters, decided on 28.10.2010, wherein following direction has been issued:- “There will be a direction to the Director, Animal Husbandry to see whether 3% quota of disabled persons has been met in the category of regular beldars. In case there is deficiency in the 3% quota in the cadre strength of regular beldars, the persons recruited in these cases shall be adjusted against those regular vacancies, since the 2 recruitment process is the same for daily wages beldars and regular beldars, . We make it clear that it is open to the Animal Husbandry department to ear-mark separate quota of 3% as against the daily waged beldars as well, subject to fulfillment of regular beldars in the ear-marked quota of 3%. Needful adjustments in the case of petitioners in the light of this judgment shall be done by the Director, Animal Husbandry, within a period of four months from the date of production of copy of this judgment by the petitioners. Consequential benefits shall also be disbursed within another period of two months.” 3. This writ petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment extracted above with a further direction to the second respondent to consider the case of the petitioner also in light of above direction and do the needful within three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the second respondent. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice (Justice V.K. Ahuja), March 10, 2011 Judge (tilak/pankaj)