1 184.11-revn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 184 OF 2011 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 162 OF 2011 Mr.Vishnu Maheshwari. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and another. ... Respondents. Ms.Mamta Chandan for the applicant. Ms.A.T.Jhaveri, APP for the State. Mangesh Y. Chavan for respondent. No.2. CORAM: B.R.GAVAI, J. DATED : 9th August 2011. P.C. : By way of this revision application, the applicant challenges the judgment and order dated 3rd February 20011 passed by the learned Sessions Judge dismissing the appeal and the order dated 3rd March 2011 passed by the learned J.M.F.C., Thane thereby convicting the applicant for the offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 2. The matter has been amicably settled between the parties. The parties have filed consent terms duly signed by them and their respective counsel. The same are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. 2 184.11-revn 3. In the above view of the matter, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The accused is acquitted of the offence charged with. The bail bond shall stand cancelled. The amount as specified in paragraph-6 of the consent terms is permitted to be withdrawn by the counsel for the applicants. 4. In view of disposal of main revision application, Criminal Application No.162/2011 does not survive. The same is disposed of accordingly. (B.R.GAVAI, J.)