1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3944 of 1999 Uday s/o. Narayan Patil Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. Respondents Mr. R.M. Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. N.B Patil, AGP for the respondents. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & S.V. GANGAPURWALA,JJ. DATE : 16TH August, 2010. PER COURT :- 1] The petitioner challenges the order dated 19/1/1999, passed by the authorities allowing the school to be shifted from Anchalgaon Taluka Bhadgaon to Bhilali, Taluka Parola, District Jalgaon. 2] Shri R.M. Deshmukh, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the said order allowing shifting of the school from Anchalgaon to Bhilali, is against the legal provisions. There was no proposal or application for the same. The said transfer would prejudicially affect the functioning of the school run by the petitioner, which is being run prior to the said transfer order. 2 3] The transfer of the said school has already been effected. More than 11 years have lapsed. If any orders are passed at this stage, that would prejudicially affect the students of the school, which is transferred to Bhilali. Neither the students nor their parents are parties to the petition nor any of them is arrayed in a representative capacity. 4] In the light of the above, we do not find any merit to interfere at this stage. The writ petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged. [S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J.] [B.R. GAVAI,J.] grt/wp