1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3434 OF 2011 (Baban Mahadeorao Godhankar vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. AUGUST 05, 2011. Heard Shri Mohta, learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the notification dated 01.03.2007 which incorporates Reciprocal Transport Agreement between Government of Maharashtra and Government of Madhya Pradesh. The contention of Shri Mohta, learned counsel is that the petitioner is operating on Amravati- Muktagiri route for last 15 years and in view of stipulation in clause 10(f) of this agreement, said route needs to be included as part of this agreement. He points out that a representation in this respect has been moved by the petitioner before the respective Secretaries of both the governments but till date no action has been taken. Shri Sonare, learned AGP for the respondents contends that even if Maharashtra Government proposes, until and unless there is sanction by Madhya 2 Pradesh Government, the route cannot be added. He further argues that this being a contractual matter between two State Governments, no direction in this respect can be issued. Shri Mohta, learned counsel has invited attention to the order in Writ Petition No. 1155 of 2010 passed on 01.04.2010, where similar directions to consider representation for inclusion of route have been issued. We refrain from expressing anything on merits of the controversy. The petitioner, who is a citizen of India and doing business in accordance with the provisions of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, has made a representation to State Government. It is for the State Government to find out feasibility thereof. Hence, we permit State Government to take appropriate decision upon that representation at the earliest within a period of eight weeks from today. With this liberty and directions, we dispose of the present petition. No order as to costs. Pending civil application, if any, is disposed of as infructuous. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.