HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 23rd May, 2006 Bail Application No. 442 of 2006 Order on the bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Mursalin S/o Wahid R/o Village Ladpur Police Station – Laksar District – Haridwar …..….Applicant Versus State of Uttaranchal ……..Opposite Party In Case Crime No. 73 of 2006 U/s 392, 411 I.P.C. Police Station Manglaur District – Haridwar Hon'ble J. C. S. Rawat, J. Heard Sri K.S. Verma-learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. It was contended that the incident took place on 06.03.2006 and the accused-applicant was not nominated in the F.I.R. The arrest was made on 30.03.2006 and the recovery of Rs. 1,400/- has been shown from the present accused-applicant. It was also pointed out that a mobile phone was also recovered from the possession of the accused but it could not be shown by the learned A.G.A. that the said mobile phone has been recovered from the present accused-applicant exclusively. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case in totality, it is a fit case for bail at this stage. Let the accused- applicant, Mursalin be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M. concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 23.05.2006 Shiv