^^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON No. 486 of2002 PETmONER &ESPONDENT : Smt. Gulnaz Rizvi, wife of Iqbal Ahmed Rizvi, aged 45 ^TS. Banstal, G.E. Road, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS : State Transport Authority, Cfihattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) ^ WRIT PETmQN UNDERARTICLE 226 QFTHECONSTTTUTIONOF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Sattsh K. Aaauhotri, J. Present: Sfari Vivek Verma Advocate on behalfof Shri B.K.Rawat, Advocate forthe petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent. ORDER(ORAL1 (Passed on 18m day of August, 2009) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that withthe passage oftime, this petition has become infiiictuous. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side has no objection. 3. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as- having become infiiictuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge A-^it ' j