IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 30TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 8TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 30036 of 2010(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.VALSARAJAN, S/O.RAMAN NAIR, AGED 54 YEARS, PWD CONTRACTOR, RESIDING AT P.O.AZHIKODE, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.A.K.ABDUL AZEEZ SRI.K.K.MOHAMED RAVUF RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, P.W.D. (ROADS & BRIDGES), NORTH CIRCLE, KOZHIKODE-1. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (GENERAL), OFFICE OF THE S.E.PWD, ROADS & BRIDGES, NORTH CIRCLE, KOZHIKODE-1. 3. KERALA STATE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LIMITED, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, 3RD FLOOR, CARMEL CENTRE, BANERJI ROAD, KOCHI-18, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER. 4. K.MOIDEENKUTTY HAJEE, P.W.D.CONTRACTOR, `PATTUVATHIL HOUSE', CHATTANCHAL P.O., THEKKIL, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. SC SRI. M.V. THAMBAN BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P. NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.30036 OF 2010(D) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner claims to be a PWD `A' class Contractor. Ext.P1 is a tender notice published by the respondents and in so far as this writ petition is concerned, the work mentioned in Ext.P1 is the improvement to Pazhassi Dam Garden Road. According to the petitioner, on conclusion of the tender process, the tender is going to be awarded to an ineligible person and that the same is against Ext.P3 Government Order. First of all, on the petitioner's own admission, he did not even submit his tender in response to Ext.P1. Therefore Petitioner is not an aggrieved person. Secondly, the Government Order, on the basis the petitioner contends that since there were only three tenderers work should have been retendered, applies only to the tenders invited by the Irrigation Department. No material has been produced to show that the Government Oder is applicable to the Public Works Department. I am not persuaded to entertain the writ petition. Writ petition fails and is dismissed. vi (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE WPC.No. /09 :2 :