IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 3300 of 2008 Between: 1 Lolugu Laxmana Rao S/o. Bangari resident of Lolugu village and Grampanchayath, Ponduru Mandal, Srikakulam District. 2 Lolugu Seetharamulu S/o. Sreeremulu resident of Lolugu village and Grampanchayath, Ponduru Mandal, Srikakulam District. 3 Lolugu Ganapathi S/o. Sreeremulu resident of Lolugu village and Grampanchayath, Ponduru Mandal, Srikakulam District. 4 Lolugu Simhadri Naidu S/o. Narasu Naidu resident of Lolugu village and Grampanchayath, Ponduru Mandal, Srikakulam District. 5 Lolugu Trinadha S/o. Narasu Naidu resident of Lolugu village and Grampanchayath, Ponduru Mandal, Srikakulam District. 6 Lolugu Satyam S/o. Narsu Naidu resident of Lolugu village and Grampanchayath, Ponduru Mandal, Srikakulam District. 7 Cholla Ramayya S/o. Late Suraiah resident of Lolugu village and Grampanchayath, Ponduru Mandal, Srikakulam District. 8 Cholla Chinnappadu S/o. Suryanarayana resident of Lolugu village and Grampanchayath, Ponduru Mandal, Srikakulam District. 9 Lolugu Rama Rao S/o. Bangari resident of Lolugu village and Grampanchayath, Ponduru Mandal, Srikakulam District. 10 Cholla Chander Rao S/o. Appanna resident of Lolugu village and Grampanchayath, Ponduru Mandal, Srikakulam District. 11 Tagarapu Yenduvadu S/o. Polaiah resident of Lolugu village and Grampanchayath, Ponduru Mandal, Srikakulam District. 12 Tagarapu suri S/o. Tata resident of Lolugu village and Grampanchayath, Ponduru Mandal, Srikakulam District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Gram Panchayath Samithi, Lolugu Village, Pondur Mandal, Srikakulam District., Represented by its Sarpanch. 2 The District Collector, Srikakulam, Srikakulam Dist. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Mandal Revenue Office, Ponduru Mandal, Srikakulam District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction particularly in the nature of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the representation of the petition 02-02-2008 by declaring the action of the 1st respondent in threatening to demolishing the structure etc., situated at the back yard of the petitioners property in Ramannagari Street, Lolugu Village, Ponduru Mandal, Srikakulam district as being highly arbitrary, and oppose to canons of law. Counsel for the Petitioners: SMTRDURGA PRASANNA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.3300 of 2008 Order: As there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on 10.06.2009, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today also, when the matter is called, none appeared for the petitioners nor is there any representation made on their behalf. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date:17.06.2009 VGB