1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.283 OF 2009 ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.284 OF 2009 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2784 OF 2006 (VVF Limited vs. Vitara Chemicals & Ors.) --------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : Court’s or Judge’s orders orders --------------------------------------------------------------- Ms.Prachi Menon i/by Shreeji & Lal for applicant Mr.Y.S. Shinde, APP for State. Ms.Pradnya Chavan i/by Manish Rai a/w Manjula Rao for respondents no.2 & 3. Coram : Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J. Date : 30th July, 2009. PC :- 1. The Criminal Application No.2784 of 2006 filed by the applicant was dismissed for non compliance of the order dated 15th December 2008. Therefore, the applicant has taken out Criminal Application No.284 of 2009 for restoration and as there is delay in seeking restoration, there is another Criminal Application filed for condonation of delay. 2 2. Heard the Advocates. Perused the proceedings. The order dated 15th December 2008 had directed the applicant to remove office objections within four weeks from the date of the order. On failure in doing so, the application was to stand dismissed without any further reference to the Court. The learned counsel for the applicant states that the only office objection was as regards service of notice upon the respondents. Admittedly respondents no.2 and 3 had been served with the notice by that day. A copy of covering letter dated 24th November 2008 addressed to Official Liquidator appointed of respondent no.1 company shows that even the Official Liquidator was served with the notice prior to 15th December 2008. In that circumstance, there was no office objection pending for removal. Hence, both the applications are allowed and Criminal Application No.2784 of 2006 is restored to file. (Judge)