IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P. No.119 of 2008 Date of Decision:- 29.05.2008 Indira Goel ....Petitioner(s) through Mr.Nitin Jain, Advocate for Mr.C.B.Goel, Advocate. vs. Sh.Jeewan Kumar Mahajan ....Respondent(s) through Mr.G.D.Gupta, Advocate. *** CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. *** 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? *** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) The petitioner, a poor widow, and her son were granted enhanced compensation by this Court vide judgment dated 8.8.2007 passed in F.A.O.No.3125 of 1996. The claim pertains to death of late Pritam Parkash Goel in a motor vehicular accident that took place on 12.12.1991. Despite the directions issued by this Court to deposit the enhanced amount of compensation within one month of receipt of certified copy of the above- stated judgment dated 8.8.2007, the compensation amount has been deposited with the Executing Court-cum-Tribunal on 30.4.2008 only i.e. after issuance of bailable warrants in these contempt proceedings as the respondent had not appeared despite service. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Having regard to the fact that the respondent has now complied C.O.C.P. No.119 of 2008 -2- with the orders passed by this Court, I am inclined to take a lenient view and accordingly drop these proceedings, however, with costs of Rs.10,000/-, which the respondent is directed to pay to the petitioner either by way of demand draft or by depositing the same with the Executing Court within two weeks, failing which the petitioner shall be entitled to get revived these contempt proceedings. Rule discharged. May 29, 2008 ( SURYA KANT ) poonam JUDGE