IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.17904 of 2011 Surendra Ram Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- with Criminal Miscellaneous No.17925 of 2011 Chhotelal Ram Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 05. 23.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposes the prayer of bail. There is case and counter-case for the occurrence of the same day, but nature of both the cases are different, assault is common in both the cases, may occur after the alleged rape, otherwise no reason is given for causing assault to accused Chhote Lal Ram, he is alleged in this case that he along with petitioner of Cr. Misc. No.17904 of 2011 took the victim girl to a paddy crop field, he kept the victims mouth closed by pressing and Surendra Ram petitioner of Cr. Misc. No.17904 of 2011 committed rape upon her. No injury is found on the person of victim girl, but her hymen is found absent and rape is corroborated by victim girl herself. Accordingly, petitioner of Cr. Misc. No.17904 of 2011 namely Surendra Ram’s prayer for regular bail stands rejected. However, he is given option to renew his prayer for trial after framing of charge in this case. 2 Sofar as bail of petitioner Chhote Lal Ram of Cr. Misc. No.17925 of 2011 is concerned, he is allowed bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner namely Chhote Lal Ram of Cr. Misc. No.17925 of 2011 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection with Surajpura P. S. Case No.90 of 2010. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)