IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23437 of 2011 Wakil Prasad Versus The State Of Bihar ----------------- 02. 09.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the complainant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 1178(C) of 2010 Tr. No. 1666/2010 for the offences under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, is named accused in this complaint case being husband of daughter of the complainant. Submission is that earlier before learned Sessions Judge reconciliation process was initiated and everything proceeded in positive direction but somehow or the other complainant filed an application before the court below on 03.06.2011 leveling some heinous allegation against the petitioner which does not find any corroboration from subsequent petition filed by daughter of the complainant (victim) herself. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named 2 petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bhojpur at Ara, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1178(C) of 2010 Tr. No. 1666/2010, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/ ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)