IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44473 of 2009 RAMKHELAWAN SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 6.1.2010. Heard. The petitioner appears one of the assailants of the deceased and on that account his earlier prayer was dismissed. The order passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jamui indicates that the case is still pending for commitment and that even the police papers have not been prepared so that the case could be committed to the court of Sessions. Other reason for pendency of the commitment proceeding is the abscondence of the accused persons. This court cannot prescribe any solution to the malady that afflicts the Judgeship of Jamui, except that the Sessions Judge could sit with his Magistrates and discuss it in the monthly meetings as to how many cases were pending for commitment and what were the reasons for the pendency. If he could have acted with some imagination, then he could have himself found the way out to get out of the situation. The petitioner is in custody since 17.3.2008 as - 2 - is indicated by the very rejection order and still the case has not been committed. It is expected that the case is committed. Let a copy of this order be placed before the Hon’ble the Inspecting Judge of Jamui Judgeship so that his Lordship may impress upon the District Judge and through him the officers posted there as to what is the necessity of committing the case to the court of Sessions. As regards the prayer for bail, the petitioner appears to be the assailant of the deceased, I am not inclined to direct the release of the above named petitioner on bail. Petition is dismissed. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )