Patna High Court CWJC No.5335 of 2006 (11) dt.17-11-2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5335 of 2006 ====================================================== Ashok Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The Union Of India & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Prakash Verma Mr. Gyan Prakash For the Respondent/s : Mr. Dr.R.Ranjan(Asst.Sg) Mr. S.N.Pathak Mr. P.L.Jaiswal (Cgc) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL) 11 17-11-2011 This matter has been listed under the heading „To Be Mentioned” at the instance of the petitioner for effecting certain corrections in the order dated 19.10.2011. Heard both sides. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the second paragraph at page 1 of the order, Sl. No. 28 is wrongly printed in place of Sl. No. 29. Having heard the parties, it is clarified that Sl. No. 28 appearing in paragraph 2 of the order at page 1 would be read as Sl. No. 29. It is next submitted that in the 4th line of the order at page Patna High Court CWJC No.5335 of 2006 (11) dt.17-11-2011 2, it has been stated as under: “He was given another opportunity in succeeding 28 SCC examination whereat he was again declared fail in the written examination.” Learned counsel submits that, in fact, the petitioner had appeared only at the written examination in 28 SCC examination whereat he was declared pass. He had, however, not appeared in the ground test of the said examination which was required to be taken by the respondent. On hearing the parties, the aforesaid sentence is modified in the following manner: “He was given another opportunity in the succeeding 28 SCC examination whereat he was declared pass in the written examination.” The order dated 19.10.2011 is modified to that extent. PANKAJ KUMAR/- (Kishore K. Mandal, J)