IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5852 OF 2002 Shobha Maya Patil ...Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents. Mr. A.M. Joshi for the Petitioner Mr. R.D. Rane, Government Pleader, for Respondents No. 1 to 3 Mr. M.V. Limaye for Respondents No. 4 and 5. CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR, Ag.C.J., & SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATE: JANUARY 27, 2006. P.C.:- 1. This petition is rendered infructuous because of the subsequent events. During the pendency of this petition, the petitioner's services were terminated by her employer, which termination was challenged before the School Tribunal. The Tribunal, by its order, has directed reinstatement of the petitioner in service of the concerned school. Implementation of that direction is subject-matter of litigation before the Tribunal. This petition is, therefore, rendered infructuous. It is disposed of as such. Rule is discharged. 2. It is, however, made clear that the above observations cannot and will not come in the way of the rights of the petitioner to be agitated in the proceedings pending now or to be taken hereafter.