IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No.9606 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision.29.09.2011 Beant Singh son of Ajaib Singh and another .....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab through its Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Civil Secretariat, Punjab, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Bawa, Advocate for the petitioners. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The grievance of the petitioner is that the 4th respondent, who has lend money for purchase of truck has taken law in his own hands and taken possession of the vehicle. The matter of contract that provides seizure of vehicle on a hire-purchase agreement, cannot be a matter for adjudication before this Court in writ by merely adding such petitioners as parties. The petitioner will have an appropriate remedy in civil suit properly instituted or if there is a provision for arbitration under the agreement under which he had obtained a loan, it will be open to the petitioner to take such redress. 2. The writ petition before this Court is dismissed. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE September 29, 2011 Pankaj*