¢€2 /a’37// g g $§§€€£LE BENQH IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P4 s ‘) No. 35: Z‘o (2010 r PETITIONER kailash Ram, S/o Late Padum Ram, aged about 32 years, R/o Mahuatikra Bhithikala, Ambikapur Distt. Sarguja (CG) VERSUS t L/State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, 'Department‘ of Higher Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawah, Raipur (CG) / , 2‘ The Commisfsioner, Department of Higher Education, Raipur (CG) 3. “The Additional RESPONDENTS Director, Department of Higher Education, Bilaspur (CG) wm'r gETITION UNDER, ARTICLE 226 oF THE CONSTITUTIONM OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT, DIRECTION, ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER \D 9x4 mmm WW§WW éw'wm SB : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. 19-07-2010 Shri Bhupendra Singh, counself Shri Vinod Tekam, Pane! Lawya Heard. This petition has been filed b the legal representative of the deceased—Padum Ram for issuance o appropriate directions in view of the order passed earlier by the tate Administrative Tribunal on 17-12-1992 in T.A.No.1237/1988 (S ri Nand Kishore & 26 others Versus State of M.P. & Others)(An exure A-2) relating to Laboratory Attendants. By the said order, the Tribunal issued a direction for consideration of case of the Laborato Attendants directing that similar benefits be extended. A Special Leave Petition was preferred against the said order‘ but the same was dismiss d by the Supreme Court w‘de its order dated 23—07-1 993, Learned counsel for the petition r submits thatrearlier Padum Ram had nled a petition (W.P.(S)No.190 of 2005) along with two other persons namely Shri C. R. Das an Shri Sohardas, but during the pendency of the said petition, Padum m died and when the aforesaid petition came up before this Court‘ an order was passed on 18-03-2010 directing consideration of cases of S ri C. R. Das and Sohardas and liberty was reserved to the legal repr entatives of the deceased-Padum Ram to tile a separate petition and in xercise of that liberty, the instant petition is filed. Gm, {RWTif‘Fhi — 3FS’H7we212M0 Au! ,00,000. wasm (W) l. W or the petitioner. ‘ for the State on advance copy. mmyis8.:&%m:25?...19.‘m 200 Wmw‘q‘ wmm mm (Way) mmm «2/ Wag$1§§m The petitioner may approach tt‘le respondents by making properly constituted representation along with a copy of petition and the order passed by this Court, Within one montp from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Upon such representation being made; if it is found that case of the deceased-Padum Ram was covered by order dated 17-12-1992 passed by the Tribunai and order dated 23-07-1993 passed by the Supreme Court, the respondents shall decide the same within a reasonable period and release financi l benefits, if any, which deceased- Padum Ram would have received, fter due verification of petitioner's entitlement to receive as per applicabl service Rules. Tumane With the aforesaid direction, th petition is finally disposed of __&‘ i Sdl- ti y Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge