IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 30TH JANUARY 2009 / 10TH MAGHA 1930 RP.No. 81 of 2007(B) ----------------------------- (AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN R.S.A. NO.227/2005 DTD. 31/08/2006 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT) .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/ APPELLANTS/ RESPONDENTS/ PLAINTIFFS: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. KEEPALLI GEETHA, W/O.LATE P.M.DINESAN, RESIDING AT MURALI NIVAS, PANAMKAVU, P.O. CHIRAKKAL, KANNUR-2. 2. P.K. DRISYA (MINOR), D/O.KEEPALLY GEETHA RESIDING AT MURALI NIVAS, PANAMKAVU, P.O.CHIRAKKAL, KANNUR-2. 3. P.K. AKSHAYA (MINOR),S/O.KEEPALLY GEETHA RESIDING AT MURALI NIVAS, PANAMKAVU,P.O.CHIRAKKAL, KANNUR-2. (REVIEW PETITIONERS 2 AND 3 MINORS ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN) BY ADVS. MR.ABRAHAM GEORGE JACOB, MR. MURALIKRISHNAN (PAYYANNUR). RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT/ APPELLANT/DEFENDANT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PALERI MATHIL VASUDEVAN, S/O. GOPALAN, PUZHATHI AMSOM & DESOM, P.O. KOTTALI, KANNUR DIST. BY MR. A.P.CHANDRASEKHARAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE, ADVS. SMT. PRABHA.R. MENON, MR.V. RAMKUMAR NAMBIAR. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/01/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: prv. M.N. KRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.P. 81 OF 2007 IN R.S.A. NO. 227 OF 2005 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 30th day of January, 2009 O R D E R This R.P. is filed to review the judgment passed by me on 31.08.06. The fight is between daughter-in-law and the father-in-law. The whole question revolves upon the validity of an assignment deed. I have considered the matter elaborately and given a verdict thereby holding that the appeal lacks merit and it is dismissed. I had given the reasonings for the disposal of the case and there is no apparent error on the face of the record and there are no sufficient grounds to review the judgment passed by me. Therefore, if the parties are really aggrieved, they can seek remedy before appropriate forum. R.P. is dismissed. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/-