n' c^^ ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. W.P. (S) No......2^(.%......2011 PETITIONER Bhuneshwar Prasad Namdev S/o Shri SadhuRam, Aged about 68 Years, ward no 16 Jhal Kadam Road P.0. and Tehsil Sakti District Janjgir Champa(C.G) RESPONDENTS ^gy ^- ,/.^' y. ^"^ \& S<e'_A-- RIT PETITION y 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through - the Secretary Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2 Joint Director Treasury Accounts and Pension Bilaspur District Bilaspi.u-fC.G) MANDAMUS/DIRECTION OF OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT. XI-HC—78 sn^r ^T f<^i4) 'tWT 3TT^T sh^li<!n »<l*l<»fT6b*ll<*» 3^ '^i'Hidi, »Ti1y'i<o, fsldl'9^ . l0.?-(^)^£,.^&l&Jl) "W;(200 3^\ 'Wf; (,'^^fl) (wiwafCT 3)i^!i SB : Hon'bie Shri Manindra Mohtin Shrivastaya, 4, 13-05-2011a Shri Somkant Verma, Shri N.Naha Roy, Panel With the consent of leamed heard finaily. This case pertains to retiral dues. Learned counsel instructions, submits that the Retirat Dues Committee. This Court, in W.P.No.464? of Chhattisgarh & offsers) and of Committee to consider the mafl question of facts were involved. T| State Government, pursuant to t^ W.P.No.1961/2006(Smfc Keja Bs^^ ChhaWsgarh and others), and M.C.C. No.105 of 2008 (Stete of\ Mandal and another). Thus, thi^ judgment and order dated W.P.No.4642/2004 (Baijnath counsei appearing for the parUes. This petition is office of the Advocate Generai i Committee, within a period of 15 this order. Thereafter, the coun^el for the petitioner. La^yer for the State. lcounsel for the parties, the petition is chi<iT<n<i1i *iiH<nf ^f f^sil ^Rit-^K ^sifOTsn^i grievahce arising on account of non-grantof appearing for the petitioner, on matt^r may be referred to the High Power i.4642)2004 (Baijnatti Mandal Vs. The State |her connected matters, directed the |er of retrial dues as the disputed fie Committee was constituted by the <e order dated 19-06-2006 passed in I Chandrakar Vs. Stste Govemment of lorder dated 13-3-2008 passed in VphhaWsgarh and ofters Vs. Baijna i petition is squarely covered by the |31 January, 2008 passed in lUlaitial (supra) as submitted by leamed accordingiy ^iisposed of in thesame terms i.e., the directed to send the case to the d|iys from the date of receipt of copy of Commit(ee shall issue nottce to the petitiQner XI-HC—78 NIHCIT a»*1iqi s^ "'iWM'if, ©Tily'Ko,fs<<'tl'y^< (iO-y-$)v^.^6(S>/K ••^200 sn^r Tra^r (i°if^«<<^i) 3IIa?I W WM 'tWT 3n^?r'a^TNi' gkllWHf^I 311^1 ^ and offlc&rs concemed within a »"l Committee shall consider and pass affording proper opportunity of hea and the ofRcers concerned may flle The entire exercise, including pa^ The peUtioner shail supply o State counset as well as coun^ transferring the same to the Committee. With the aforesaid observaf CM<lt<'1<ll*1 ^ifHC'ff ^f fe^ ^f^l¥^R ^aifw sii^i furffier penoa or is order, in accordance with taw, after ring to the petitioner. The petitioner additionat documents, if necessary. ment of retiral dues, if any, to the petrtioner, be compteted wittiin a p4riod of four months from ttie date of receipt of a copy of this order. ie comptete set of the petttion to the sl for the Accounant General for ons, the petition is finaily disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge