IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1361 of 2010 1. Ramrati Devi, W/o Sri Suresh Paswan. 2. Suresh Paswan, S/o Late Sita Ram Paswan. 3. Jitendra Paswan @ Jitendra Kumar, S/o Sri Suresh Paswan. All are residents of Mohalla- Bhaga No-4, P.S. Jhariya, District- Dhanbad State- Jharkhand. 4. Kiran Devi, W/o Sri Jalandhar Paswan. 5. Jalandhar Paswan, S/o Rupu Paswan Both residents of Village-Niyamatpur, P.S.-Belaganj, District-Gaya. 6. Krishna Paswan, S/o Late Faudar Paswan. Resident of Village- Nehalpur Bhuitoli, P.S. Belaganj, District-Gaya. 7. Lakshaman Paswan, S/o Late Faudar Paswan, Resident of Village- Ore, P.S. Belaganj, District-Gaya. 8. Savita Devi, W/o Yogendra Paswan, resident of Mohalla- Bhaga No-5, P.S. Jhariya, District-Dhanbad State-Jharkhand. ……….Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar …………………………….Opposite Party. For the petitioners :- Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate. For the complainant :- Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh, Advocate. ----------- 2. 28. 04. 2010. Heard the parties. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 436/2009, in which cognizance has been taken for offences under Sections 147, 323 and 498 A of the Indian Penal Code. In compliance of order dated 06. 04. 2010, the complainant Urmila Devi and her husband accused-Dharmendra Paswan are physically present in the Court and they have filed a joint compromise petition, which has been signed by the counsels of the complainant as well as petitioners. Let compromise petition be kept on record, which shall form part of this order. As per terms of compromise accused Dharmendra 2 Paswan (husband) and the complainant Urmila Devi (wife) have resolved to restore their matrimonial relationship. Accused Dharmendra Paswan has undertaken to keep his wife with all dignity, comfort and honour at the place of his posting. The complainant also undertakes to cooperate for having happy conjugal relationship between them. In view of aforesaid compromise, in the event of their arrest/surrender, the petitioners, who are relations and family members of accused Dharmendra Paswan and in-laws of complainant, shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri U. P. Singh, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Gaya, in connection with Complaint Case No. 436/2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. Non compliance of terms of compromise petition would be construed as misuse of privilege of anticipatory bail granted to the petitioners and consequences shall follow. m.p. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)