cTT- -SfcOlT' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT^ILASPUR Writ Petition No. ^7 /2003 / PETITIONERS 1. M/s Radha Krishna Ferro AIIoys Pvt. Ltd. through Shrawan Singhania, Managing Director, Danipara, Thana Road, Raigarh (C.G.) 2. Ashok Singhania, Main Road, Vill.: Lailunga Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 3. Niranjan Lal Agrawal, Nayaganj, Raigarh (C.G.) .< "n ..••'. - Versus - /\Q^^ ^y..'^ RESPONDENTS 1. Union of India, Through Secretary, Ministry of Law, Shastri Bhawan, R. P. Road, New Delhi. . ^" ^ ^' "^r 2. Branch Manager * AIIahabad Bank, Raigarh (C.G.) .;? ..lr? ^ "-N'; v> ^ 3. Regional Manager, Through AIIahabad Bank, AGM Office LIC Building Pandri Road Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETIT10N UNDER ARTICLE 226/2^7 OF T H E CONSTITUTIONOF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A SU1TABLE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECT I O N. XI-HC-22 -ssi'^tFWvW. ^ftOT?, ftdKiy W-T<?tl (D*<1<*1 SS^ 'VS^K .tw.:f.:J.^.%. "WI. 20ttJ fc|<)<i8T" sn^i^it r^i'b snlsi sh<iict» yt?a 311^1 ^wiwater *l<(i<"t41-t MWrii 4 fS^t <RK(K ^T dlt-dtl 3(!^I DMSION BENCH: HON'BLE SHRI A.S.VENKATACHAUt MOORTHY, CJ &HON'BLESHRIFAKHRUDDIN.J. i 29/06/2004: - Shri M.L.Pastore, counsel for the petiUoner. Shri Vinay Harit, Sr. Standing C|»unselforthe Union <rf India, for respondent No.1. None for the respondent No.2 Following the decision of the Sttweme Court in <he matter <rf Mardia Chemical Ltd. Vs. Union oflndia|(aXMAIRSCW2S41),thewrit petition stands dismissed. i However, it is made ctear that ^there a secured creditor has |aken actten under Section 13{4) Reconstruction of Financial Assrts a ]of the SecuriUsaUon and j»d Enfwcement of Swurity (nterest Act, 2002 in such cases it woul<| be open to borrowers to file tippeals under Section 17 of the ^|ct within flie limitation as Isrescribed therefor, to be counted with -JL——^, Sd/- Chief Justice from today. ._—..^~—.. ' Sdf- Fak'nruddin Judge