IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 22496 of 2006 Between: 1 Totta Veer Raju, S/o. Nukayya, R/o.Lingaparthy Village, Yeleswaram Mandal, E.G.District. 2 Ganta Rajya lakshmi Sarojini, W/o. Satti Babu, R/o.Lingaparthy Village, Yeleswaram Mandal, E.G.District. 3 Artikatla Kondaiah, S/o. A. Veer Raju, R/o.Lingaparthy Village, Yeleswaram Mandal, E.G.District. 4 Ganta Satti Babu, S/o. Ganga Raju, R/o.Lingaparthy Village, Yeleswaram Mandal, E.G.District. 5 Ganta Durga Bhavani, W/o. Ch. Hari Chandra Prasad, R/o.Lingaparthy Village, Yeleswaram Mandal, E.G.District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The District Collector, land Acquisition, E.G.District, Kakinada. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Land Acquisition Officer, Pedapuram, E.G.District. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Yeleswaram mandal, E.G.District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandmaus, declaring the action of the respondent in issuing the impugned notice U/s. form 6 and 7 reference Ref.No.1071/2006 dt. 21.07.2006 without conducting any enquiry U/s. 5-A of land acquisition Act and without calling for objection as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the acquisition proposals under Indiramma Programme initiated by Respondent in the Petitioners land admeasuring Ac.10-59 cents in S.No.482p, 434, 485, 486 and 489/2 of Lingamparthy Village, Yeleswaram Mandal, E.G.District and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.CHIDAMBARAM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : Form-NIC-OGS/WP{JGK} O R D E R:- Sri K.Chidambaram, learned counsel for the petitioners, has submitted a letter dated 8.4.2008 seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ______________ 09.04.2008 bcj