1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION P.I.L. NO. 73 OF 2008 P.I.L. NO. 73 OF 2008 P.I.L. NO. 73 OF 2008 Narayan S. Bhanwase & Anr. .. Petitioners. vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents. Mr. Rupesh K. Bobade for Petitioners. Mr. P.I. Khemani, AGP. for Respondents. CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & R.M. SAVANT, JJ. R.M. SAVANT, JJ. R.M. SAVANT, JJ. DATE: 4TH FEBRUARY, 2009. DATE: 4TH FEBRUARY, 2009. DATE: 4TH FEBRUARY, 2009. P.C. . We do not find any merit in the matter as such counselling guidance centres for the students are functional at all levels. The petitioner himself can establish a guidance centre if he is so concerned about the students in rural areas. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner says that the petitioner has already started a counselling and guidance centre. If that is so, nothing remains in the matter. The PIL is dismissed. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) 2 (R.M. Savant, J.) (R.M. Savant, J.) (R.M. Savant, J.)