./ s ^»^.i^"¥:'^^ ^!l'sss^s^'' M> f°' XI-HC—78 'S^! •^W\vi^, w^ww, fq<tiyy *11*1CTI 9»*(l«t> "^.200 3ii^?Tra^ (1i?f3^ei) sn^iqnRira wiraii^t^riT ^wnw *ttca <tff^?i *i<ifd<i1-< ^iwaf 4 fs(st <Fntsi< ^aifin sii^i W.P. (S) Ko. 695/2009 PETITIONER Sudharsjhasan Bhoi, S/o Shri Nandlal (ged about 30 years, Village P.0. Saldhi, P.S. & Tehsil- |(Jonk), District - Mahasamund Bhoi, Khamtaitai Sankaral Versus RESPONDENTS 1. 2. 3. 4. State (sf Chhattisgarh, through the Secretaty, Departraent of Home, D.K.S. Bhawa4, Raipur Directof General of Police, State of Chhatti^garh, Directorate, Raipur Superirjtendent of Police (Railways), Govern]|nent Railway Police, Raipur High L^vel Caste Scrutiny Committee, Ravi ^hankar University Campus, Raipur WRIT PETITION UNDElR ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITU ION OF INDIA SB: HON. SHRI DHIRENDRA IMISHRA 05-2-2009 Shri Utkarsh Varma, co Shri Y.S. Thakur,~Dy. Ai Heard. The petitioner has fil( following reliefs:- "10.1.Direct by issuing the respondent circular dated 2' supra) |insel for the petitioner. Ivocate General for the State. jd the instant petidon for the Dhe writ of mandamus to (o.3 to act as per the i.9.2007 (Annexure P-7 ^)' XI-HC—78 ~3^ '<41<11<1<1, i?Tll<-l'IS,(s|<yll*13,< <(ndl <*»*<ieh W[,200 an^r Tra^' (i^f^^) sn^t ^RI'RFfh? TTO 3?T^?T s!n*iicti C«ii«tRflf?(f 2_- '+wfrt'fl'l 4141'if'if ft^ <[:'I«;K ^sifinaii^ 10.2 Direct by issuing the respondent ^ certificate withk document whatsot :he writ of mandamus to o.4 to verify the caste lut demanding any ver from the petitioner." the Leamed counsel for petitioner wa.s recruited on| scheduled tribe category vid)E 13.8.2008. Subsequent to his directed to produce permanenjt the competent authority vid| 5.1.2009 and the petitioner account of non-production of| verified by the competent auth|i Learned counsel for thf the State of Chhattisgarh vid^ 26a September 2007 issued of the State to provisionally a) reserved category tojoin their| their caste certificates by Committed. In case, the casj candidates is found to be fals< mav be terminated and necesi him. Despite the above allowed the petitioner to joii submits that his applicatioi|i petitioner submits that the the post of Constable in the order of Annexure P-3 dated recruitment, the petitioner was caste certfficate duly verified by order of Annexure P-6 dated las not been allowed joining on Ipermanent caste certificate duly jority. petitioner further submits that circular of Annexure P-7 dated cjirections to various departments llow the successful candidates of |services subject to verification of (he High Level Caste Scrutiny te certificate produced by such |, the concerned eniployee/officer tary action may be taken against •, respondent No.3 has not on the post of Constable. He circtLilar, for verification of the caste .^^/ -- _ llfi33i M-HC—78 311^1 ^RlftTOT <rarw^ St>HI<»» '3^ ^ww^, w\wi<a, f^oi+fy *11*1CTI <*»Nlttt •TF^200 Sffl^T 'qiRi' (•i°li3<l'i.4) wnw ^ftd aii^i -3 petit^oner learAed certificate is pending before| Committee. In these circuinstA to provisionally allow the On the other hand that the petitioner may be di^t Scrutiny Committee and COOF|( the mater of verification to hisl In view of the above sib the parties, the instant petitic|n respondent No.3 to provision; the post of Constable till his pje verified by the High Level petitioner is also directed to on 20th February 2009 and for expeditious decision in permanent caste certificate. Certified copy as per rul^s. ^hNfd^-t ^wv^ ^f 'fe^l' <r4't^l< iTsffin SD^I the High Level Caste Scrutiny ^nces the respondents be directed to join his services. counsel for the State submits fected to appear before the Caste ;rate with the said Committee in 1 permanent caste certificate. ibmission of leamed counsel for ic|n is disposed of with direction to i^lly allow the petitioner to join on irmanent caste certificate is duly Scrutiny Comn'iittee and the a|ppear before the said Committee ct>operate with the said Committee the matter of verification of his Calste Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ;1; .-> •^ A ^i