HIGH COUR? OF CH%iATTiSGARH: B§LASPUR Writ Petitian (S) Na. 868 of 2%.‘2 Petitionef W Kama: Prasad Sahu, 8/0. Late Shri Ramdava: Sahu, Age about 5f) years, Asstt. Teachen Govt. Primary Schaol; Bhathali, Black - Distt.- Dhamtari (CG) Versus ”i) sate Govt. 0f Chahmsqam through Secretary. Education & Tribal Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Ra§pur (CG) 2) District Education omcer, Distt‘ Dhamtari (CG). 3) Biack Education omcer, Biock Dhamtari (CG), Resggndents Dhamtari, {Writ Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of indie) $3: Hon’bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. shri Somkant Verma, counsei for the petitioner. Smt. Bénu Sharma, Pane: Lawyer forthe State. Present; ORAL ORDER (Passed on 11‘“ February; 2008) as Tor t‘ne State/respondents jointiy submit that the facts and question of Eaw invoived in the to that of in Writ Petition (S) No.1483 of 2006 present writ petition are simiiar / (Aeman Jain Vs. the State Government of Chnattisgarh and another) Wienwas/ disposed of vide order dated 10‘“ November, 2006 (Annexure PM). They further submits that the question of law invoived is aiso the same. Raju ix... r Learned oounsei appearing for the petitioner as weii 2) in View of the above stated submissions made by teamed counsei for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 10*“ November, 2008 passed by this Court in Writ Petition (S) No. 1463 of 2006 {Aeman Jain Vs. the State Government of Chhattisgam and another). No order as to costs. (1/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge