IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44461 of 2010 WAKIL SHARMA, SON OF LATE KALI SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 24.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No. 203 of 2009 registered under Sections 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code Admittedly, petitioner is father-in-law of the deceased whose marriage had taken place nine years ago. Furthermore, it is an admitted position that the Fardbeyan of the informant was recorded on 04.12.2009 whereas he had already got information regarding the alleged occurrence on 01.12.2009. It is also an admitted position that the informant is not an eye-witness of the alleged occurrence and furthermore, in course of investigation, not a single person has claimed to have seen the actual killing of the deceased. It is surprisingly enough that not only the concerned Police has registered the case under Section 304(B) of the Indian Penal Code but also learned Sessions Judge rejected the prayer for bail of the petitioner treating the case as 304(B) of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the aforesaid circumstances as well as submissions of the parties above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with above stated Parbatta P.S. Case No. 203 of 2009. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )