IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12962 of 2009 RAGHUBIR CHOUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 20.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Petitioner is in custody since 13.9.2007 for an offence under sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code in relation to Rajnagar P.S. Case No. 62 of 2007. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner was not named in the FIR even though he supposed to be a co-villager. No T.I. Parade has been held and there is no recovery. Not only this other co-accused, namely, Md. Rahmul @ Firoz has been enlarged on bail by a Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 10864 of 2009. Petitioner therefore deserves similar indulgence by this Court. Keeping the period the petitioner spent in custody and for the reasons indicated above, let the petitioner, namely, Raghubir Choudhary be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rs. Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of F.T.C. 3, Madhubani in connection with Sessions Trial No. 69 of 2008 arising out of Rajnagar P.S. Case No. 62 of 2007 (G.R. No.530 of 2007). One of the sureties will be executed by the wife of the petitioner, namely Rambha Devi on due identification by the trial below. It is further directed that the petitioner will appear on each and every date physically before the trial court and shall not abscond. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)