:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 3 OF 2008 REVIEW PETITION NO. 3 OF 2008 REVIEW PETITION NO. 3 OF 2008 IN IN IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 117 OF 2005 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 117 OF 2005 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 117 OF 2005 Dinesh D. Kamath ..Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents And ITM Institute of Financial Markets (ITM-IFM) ..Applicants WITH WITH WITH REVIEW PETITION NO. 4 OF 2008 REVIEW PETITION NO. 4 OF 2008 REVIEW PETITION NO. 4 OF 2008 IN IN IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 117 OF 2005 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 117 OF 2005 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 117 OF 2005 Dinesh D. Kamath ..Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents And M/s. Brotherhood Education Trust ..Applicants Ms. Anita Castelino with Ms. Deepa Kamat i/b. Ms. Zohra J. Shaikh for the Applicants in Review Petition No. 3 of 2008. Mr. R. D. Soni i/b. Mr. M. A. Saiyed for the Applicants in Review Petition No. 4 of 2008. Mr. A. A. Kumbhakoni, Associate Advocate General for the State. Mr. R. Raghuwanshi, Additional Solicitor General, for the Union of India. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and :2: S. A. BOBDE, JJ. S. A. BOBDE, JJ. S. A. BOBDE, JJ. DATE : 5TH MARCH, 2008. DATE : 5TH MARCH, 2008. DATE : 5TH MARCH, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. In Public Interest Litigation No. 117 of 2005, this Court passed an order on 30.1.2008. A notice was issued to 14 Institutions by the Government, and they had not filed a reply within the stipulated time. The notice given to them by the Government was as to why those institutions be not closed, as they were running without the requisite permission. Two of those institutions are the Applicants herein, which have now filed these Review Petitions. 2. These Institutions admittedly are not approved by AICTE. However, they are affiliated to University. But they submit no approval by AICTE is necessary. Therefore, the order passed by this Court should not apply to it. 3. After hearing the parties, we are of the view that let the matters be considered by the Government whether these institutions needed approval from AICTE or not, and the Applicants may, therefore, file representation before the Government within a period of two weeks, and if such a :3: representation is filed, the Government shall decide the same on merits, unmindful of the order passed by this Court, within a period of two weeks thereafter. With this observation, the Review Petitions are disposed of. (BILAL NAZKI, J.) (BILAL NAZKI, J.) (BILAL NAZKI, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.)