IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5931 of 2007 Between: Bhongiri Yadamma @ Gagarapu Yadamma and another ..... PETITIONER(S) AND Jitta Ramaswamy and others .....RESPONDENT(S) HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5931 of 2007 ORDER: Petitioners are the Judgment Debtors who filed this revision under Section 115 C.P.C. assailing the correctness of the order allowing the petition filed under Rule 141(2) of the Civil Rules of Practice and under Order XXI Rule 35 of C.P.C. seeking to deliver possession of the property, rejecting the objections raised by them. Heard the learned counsel for both sides and perused the material on record. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and especially in view of the categorical reasons given by the Court below on the objections raised by the petitioners, I am of the opinion that the objections raised by the petitioners are wholly misconceived and are not sustainable. It is needless to mention that any person stepping into the shoes of the decree holder can always proceed against the judgment debtors and, therefore, there can be no impedement on the execution. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed. No costs. ____________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J 24th June, 2010 CVRK