/, SIN‘u‘LE EESwH, O W\W IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.(S)No. ‘%9L( /2011 (3.3.) RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. I i W PETITIONER /’: Padmawati Patel, D/o Shri Dhurv Kumar Patel, aged about 21 years, R/o Village Risora, Post Risora, Tahsil Baramkela, distt. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS / : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through :— The Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development, Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chief - Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Baramkela, Distt. Raigarh(C.G.) Block Education officer, Baramkela, Distt. Raigarh (c.G.) /§ (w NM HIGH COURT OF CHHATI‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S! No. 894 of201l Padmawati Patel. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PETITIONER Present: Shri N.K.Chatterjee, Advocate on behalfof Smt. Sudha Agawal, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N,N.Roy, Panel iawyer for the State/respondents. . ORDER ORAL (Passed on 14 day of February, 2011)‘ l. By this petition, the petitionef has prayed for issuance of writ/order/direction to the respondent No, 2 to appoint the petitioner on the post of Shiskah Karmi Grade HI (Arts) as per set-up and as being passed ih the examination conducted by the Vyapam for appointment on the said post, as the petitioner is entitled for appointment and also to direct the respondent No. 2 to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass appropriate order in .w’rm accordance with law. 2. In the opinion of this Coutt, such relief cannot be sought for straightway before the High Court in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, as the matterrelating to recruitment of Shiksha Karmi in schools situated at rural areas are governed by the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Shiksha Kanni (Recruitment & Conditions of Services) Rules, 2007. The said Rules provide for an appeal in the event, any person is not selected and he feels that he was a meritorious candidate than any other selected candidate. 3. The petitioner, if so advised, may prefer an appeal under the above said Rules for redressal of his grievances. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Gomi Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge SB: Ho’ble n Shri Prashant Kumar Mis