IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH AUGUST 2008 / 5TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 25801 of 2008(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ M.K.NABEEL, S/O KOCHU THAMBU, MURIKKOLIL VEEDU, NADAKKAL P.O.,' ERATTUPETTA. BY ADV. SRI.BABY THOMAS SRI.K.B.ARUNKUMAR SRIE.V.SAJI SRI.HARIDAS RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. ERATTUPETTA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, ERATTUPETTA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERATUPETTA POLICE STATION, KOTTAYAM. 3. REGIONAL TRASPORT AUTHORITY, PALA P.O., PALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,. R1 & 2 BY GOV ERNMENT PLEADER SMT. K.R.DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) 25801 of 2008 -------------------------------------------------------- Dated: AUGUST 27, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner complains that in front of the shopping complex constructed by him, autorickshaws are parked inn an indiscriminate manner, obstructing ingress and egress. It is complaining of this that he filed Exts.P2 and P3 before respondents 1 and 2. In this writ petition what is mainly complained of is that the aforesaid representations are not taken note of by respondents 1 and 2 and therefore he seeks a direction to them to take action on the representations so filed. 3. Having regard to the facts as stated above, I feel that, if Exts.P2 and P3 have been received by respondents 1 and 2, it is only appropriate that these are taken note of and orders passed thereon. This shall be done by respondents 1 and 2 as expeditiously as possible, and at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this WP(C) 25801/08 2 judgment. 4. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before respondents 1 and 2 for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-