Civil Revision No. 2838 of 2009 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2838 of 2009 Date of decision: 18.05.2009. Rupinder Singh Petitioners Versus Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ropar ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Ashwani Arora, Advocate for the petitioners ***** S.D.ANAND, J. It is apparent from the impugned award that the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ropar (hereinafter referred to as “the Tribunal”), (while disposing of the MACT Case No.82 of 11.5.2005, had directed the award of compensation of Rs.98500/- in favour of the petitioner-claimant. The amount was deposited. The petitioner applied for disbursement thereof. Vide impugned order dated 22.11.2008, the successor of the learned Tribunal ordered that the release of the amount shall “on his furnishing indemnity and surety bonds in the sum of Rs.1,50,000/-.” It is apparent from the circumstances of the case that the Executing Court passed an order which is not in accord with the main award. The imposition of a rider regarding furnishing of indemnity and surety bonds in the sum of Rs.1,50,000/- would appear to be Civil Revision No. 2838 of 2009 -2- **** voidable order particularly because the Tribunal had noticed in the impugned order itself that no stay had been received. The petition shall stand allowed in limine. The amount shall be disbursed in favour of the petitioner-claimant without the Tribunal insisting upon the furnishing of indemnity and surety bonds in the sum of Rs.1,50,000/-. May 18, 2009 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge