ig.3 PETITIONER$/ (Defendanf) w 4 ..... kesPONoENTs (Plaintiff I vkr / ywwuw uwwwJWNvx/JM/ M K $§§3§i§§ §EN$H \N IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION 227 NO. 57g of 2010 gn‘rosh Kumar Yadav, S/o .Shri Pargam'ya Yadav, aged 25 years, R/o / Nagar', Khamfarai,Disfricf—Raipur‘ (CG) Ps- Birjha Bai Widow of U Shri Sarju Yadav 65, R/o Sanfoshi Nagur' Khammrai, Tehsn & Districf Jeepba Mruvy ~42 (CG). OF INDIA {0. 034 v” Sanfoshi WRIT PEFI'HON UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION g @ HIGH COURT OF CHkiATTiSGARH AT EILASPUR l Smgh Bench Hun’ble Shn Justice Prashant Kumar Mushra \ i ‘ Writ Petitian {227} No.513 0f 2MDn ? Petitiener , $ant0'sh Kymar ‘(adav Versus > I I ' i Respendent‘ ~ Bir}ha Ba‘: ‘ l $hn Deversm Thakur counsei for the petltloneJ None appears for the respondent l i Writ Petition under Article 227 of the {zdnstitmian m andia‘ l 0 R A L 0‘ R D E R ' (03.322010) Heard on admissicn. (2) Leamed ma¥ Court has rejected defendant'$ app!ication Aunde! Order 1 Rub 1Q of CFC t0 §oin ane Devendra 8am a$ party to :he wit on the gmund that the said Devendra Kumar Sahu claims m have purchased a part ef the suit premises and threatening dispossessien 9f the petitEoner from the suit pmmises in an megai manner. (3) The present sui: fsr eviction has been {areferred by the respandentfpraintiff. ¥t i3 5e¥tleé raw that tn a suit tor aviation, no ethe? person exsept the tandtortt and the tenant are the necessary earty. (4) There being no errur in the exercise at étrr'redictien by the trtet Ceurt, this pettt'mn under Artiste 227 of the Conetttut‘ron of tneia'faiie and is hereb dismissed \4 Sd// i Prashant Kumar Mishra f Judge t Bint Z y