IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10448 of 2007 SUBHADRA KUMARI w/o Bahadur Rai resident of Ward No. 1 Tamaul Parsa, Gram Panchayat Naya Nagar Mushari, District Madhepura….. Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Commissioner, Kosi Division, Saharsa 3. The Collector, Madhepura, District Madhepura 4. The District Welfare Officer Madhepura, District Madhepura. 5. The C.D.P.O. Murliganj Block, District Madhepura. 6. Smt. Mala Devi Deputy Chief Tamaul Parsa Gram Panchayat Block Murliganj District Madhepura. 7. Smt. Sarita Devi w/o Navin Kumar, Ward No. 3, Tamaul Parsa Gram Panchayat Murliganj District Madhepura. … Respondents. ----------- 2. 03.12.2009. Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. The prayer of the petitioner in this writ application reads as follows:- “1. That this is a writ application for issuance of a writ in the nature of writ of Mandamus Commanding the respondents to appoint/select the petitioner on the post of Anganwari Sewika as per guidelines of the State Government at Naya Nagar Mushari Ward No. 5 newly sanctioned Anganbari Centre.” With reference to the aforementioned reliefs, learned counsel for the petitioner would seek leave to move before the Collector of the District who is the Prescribed Authority under the circular of the State Government for looking into the any anomaly in - 2 - selection/appointment on the post of Anganwari Sevika. That being so, this writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to file a compact representation. In the event, such a representation is filed, the same would be disposed of by the Collector of the District by speaking order after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, any other person who may have aggrieved by the cause of action of the petitioner as also the representative of concerned Gram Panchayat within a period of six months from the date of filing of such representation. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)