IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** C.W.P. No.11485 of 2010 Date of Decision:25.11.2011 Balkar Singh .....Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. M.K. Sajjan, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Kavita Arora, AAG, Punjab. Dr. Urmil Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.3. Mr. N.P.S. Mann, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been promoted to the post of Fire Station Officer and the present petition has become infructuous but the seniority of the petitioner has not been refixed whereas learned counsel for the State as well as for the private respondents submit that the petitioner has no right for refixation of the seniority as he has already given his consent for foregoing his previous seniority. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the present petition has become infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous. However, in case, the petitioner is still aggrieved by any action of the respondents, he is at liberty to make representation to the concerned authorities, which shall be considered by the respondents in accordance with law. November 25, 2011 ( DAYA CHAUDHARY ) renu JUDGE