IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM THURSDAY, THE 22ND JULY 2010 / 31ST ASHADHA 1932 RCRev..No. 165 of 2004(A) ------------------------ RCA.83/2002 of D.C. & SESSIONS COURT,KOZHIKODE RCP.52/2001 of MUNSIFF COURT, VADAKARA .................... REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/PETITIONER ------------------------------------------------------ P.P.BALAKURUP, S/O.NARAYANI AMMA, VAIKKILASSERY AMSOM, VADAKARA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.R.K.MURALEEDHARAN SMT.S.LAKSHMY RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT --------------------------------------------------- CHALAPURATH RAMAKRISHNAN, S/O.BALAN, PONMERI AMSOM, VADAKARA TALUK. THIS RENT CONTROL REVISION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ---------------------------------- R.C.R. No.165 of 2004 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2010 O R D E R --------------- Pius C.Kuriakose,J. Sri.R.K.Muralidharan, learned counsel for the revision petitioner landlord submitted that subsequent to filing of the RCR the landlord filed a fresh RCP and secured the order of eviction, which is presently being executed. Counsel sought time to seek further instructions from the client as to what is the status of the E.P. We are of the view that, since fresh RCP was filed by the revision petitioner and he was successful in getting an eviction order, which is now being executed, it is not necessary that we examine the merits of the grounds raised herein. This RCR is accordingly closed. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE. okb