HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 6th May, 2009 First Bail Application No. 217 of 2009 Order on the bail application of the accused. Amit @ Sonu D/o Dhanpal Singh …….. Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …….. Opposite Party Case Crime No.56 of 2008 U/s 379 and 411 I.P.C. Police Station Shyampur District Haridwar Hon’ble J. C. S. Rawat, J. Heard Mr. Vivek Shukla, Advocate for the accused/applicant; Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. G.A. for the State; and perused the record. After due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties; contents of the F.I.R.; averments made against the accused/applicant; perusal of affidavit and counter affidavit; the fact that the vehicle which was subject matter of theft has been recovered from the possession of the accused/applicant; and in the facts and circumstances of the case, it is not a fit case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application is rejected. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 06.05.2009 Shiv