IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD SEPTEMBER 2008 / 12TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 21607 of 2008(V) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- E.D.FRANCIS S/O. DEVASSY, AGED 80 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, E.P.DEVASSY UMBRELLA MERCHANTS,M.O.ROAD, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.JIJO PAUL RESPONDENT: ---------------------- THE THRISSUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THRISSUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OFFICE, M.O.ROAD, THRISSUR. ADV. SRI.K.B.MOHANDAS, SC FOR R1 SRI.LELLULAL T.G.THUNDATHIL FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.21607/2008 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of September, 2008 JUDGMENT Heard both sides. Petitioner submits that, Ext.P2 is an application which he wanted to make to the respondent Corporation for obtaining a licence. It is stated that the application was not accepted and it is in view of this the writ petition is filed. Counsel for the respondent submits that as the application was not accompanied by the consent of the land lord they were not in a position to entertain the same. It may be true that, there is such a requirement, but then the fact remains that if the petitioner wanted to make an application it ought to have been accepted and orders passed. Since, this has not been done, it is directed that Ext.P2 application shall be accepted and considered. 2 However, I clarify that I have not examined the question as to whether the petitioner ought to have produced the consent of the land lord along with the application and it is a matter entirely for the Corporation to consider. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE vi. 3