Item No. 40, DJ/- SBCWP NO. 9602/2010 Mukesh Kumar Ameta Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. Order dt: 20th October, 2010 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9602/2010 Mukesh Kumar Ameta Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. DATE OF ORDER ::: 20th October, 2010 P R E S E N T HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. Arjun Purohit, for the petitioner. --- 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner has approached this Court against the order Annex-7 dated 31.05.2010 rejecting the candidature of the petitioner for seeking appointment on the post of Prabodhak. The petitioner has already sent a legal notice/representation through his advocate vide Annex-8 dated 26.07.2010, which has not been responded by the respondents so far. 3. The dispute in the present matter is as to whether the petitioner has become overage on the cut off date i.e. 01.01.2009 or not. According to petitioner, on the said cut off date he was not overage or more than 35 years of age as his date of birth is 26.05.1975. The impugned order Annex-7 dated 31.05.2010 does not contain these details, therefore, it cannot be said that same contains Item No. 40, DJ/- SBCWP NO. 9602/2010 Mukesh Kumar Ameta Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. Order dt: 20th October, 2010 2/2 cogent reasons or it is a speaking order. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, it is considered expedient to dispose of this writ petition while directing the respondents to decide the legal notice/representation submitted by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today by a speaking order discussing points raised by the petitioner in his representation. 5. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Copy of this order to be sent to the respondents forthwith. (DR. VINEET KOTHARI), J. DJ/- 40