HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.3397 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 24.02.2011 **** Kiran . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. RK Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner ***** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner is said to have made a complaint against respondent No.6 containing various allegations including sexual harassment. It is alleged that no action is being taken on her complaint dated 02.06.2010 (Annexure P1) (2). Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and without expressing any views on allegations leveled by her with a further clarification that this order shall not be construed as a direction to take action against respondent No.6 even if he is innocent in the matter, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondents No.2 to 4 to take cognizance of the petitioner’s complaint (Annexure P1); hold a preliminary enquiry, if already not held and thereafter proceed strictly in accordance with law. (3). The needful shall be done with a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (4). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 24.02.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge