RSA 205 of 2007. 4.3.2008 Present: Mr. B.S.Ranjan with Mr. H.C.Sharma, counsel for the appellant. Mr. V.D.Khidta, counsel for respondents 1 to 6. All the respondents have been served. Mr. V.D.Khidta appears on behalf of respondents 1 to 6. Respondent No. 7 has been served, nobody appears on her behalf. CMP(M) 26 of 2007. Heard. This application is not opposed. It is accordingly allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is condoned in the interest of justice. Application is disposed of. CMP 131 and 132 of 2008. The parties have compromised the matter in terms of Ex.C-1 which has been signed by the counsel as also the judgment debtor(s) and the decree holder(s). The contents of the compromise have been read over and explained to the parties present in Court today. CMP 132 of 2008 has been filed wherein leave of the Court is sought to enter into compromise on behalf of respondents 1 to 4 who are minors. This application has been moved on behalf of the minors respondents 1 to 4 by their mother and natural guardian respondent No. 5. I have gone through the terms of the compromise as also the -2- controversy between the parties. It would be in the interest of justice if the mother is allowed to compromise the matter on behalf of the minors- respondents. This application is accordingly allowed and permission granted to respondent No. 5 to enter into compromise on behalf of the minors. Both applications are accordingly allowed. RSA 205 of 2007 This appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise as contained in Ex.C-1 being CMP Nos. 131 and 132 of 2008. Let a decree be drawn up in terms of the compromise. All pending applications shall stand disposed of. March 4, 2008(PC). (Dev Darshan Sud), J.