IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.11867 of 1999 ======================================================= Vijay Bhanu Gupta, son of Late Raghubir Prasad Resident of Rajendra Path beside Canara Bank Siwan Police Station Siwan, District Siwan. .... .... Petitioner/Informant. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Niraj Kumar Gupta son of Bajrangi Sah, resident of Mohalla Turha, Toli, Siwan Police Station Town Police Station Siwan, District Siwan. .... .... Opposite Party/s with Criminal Miscellaneous No. 11883 of 1999 ======================================================= Vijay Bhanu Gupta, son of Late Raghubir Prasad Resident of Rajendra Path beside Canera Bank, Siwan, Police Station Siwan, District Siwan. .... .... Petitioner/Informant Versus 1. State Of Bihar 2. Pankaj Kumar Gupta @ Pappu son of Bajrangi Sah, resident of Mohalla Turha Toli, Siwan, Police Station Siwan, District. .... .... Opposite Party/s ======================================================= Appearance : (In Cr.Misc. No. 11867 of 1999) (In Cr.Misc. No. 11883 of 1999) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :Dr. Rabindra Kumar, A.P.P. ======================================================= CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL) Amaresh Kumar Lal, J. Both the cases arise out of Siwan P. S. Case No. 52 of 1998 as such both the applications have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. Cr. Misc. No. 11867 of 1999 has been Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11867 of 1999 dt.02-09-2011 2 filed by the informant-petitioner for cancellation of bail granted to opposite party No. 2, Niraj Kumar Gupta vide order dated 3.8.1998 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, I, Siwan in B. P. No. 766 of 1998 and Cr. Misc. No. 11883 of 1999 has been filed by the informant- petitioner for cancellation of bail granted to opposite party no. 2, Pankaj Kumar Gupta @ Pappu vide order dated 24.6.1998 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, I, Siwan in B. P. No. 605 of 1998 on the ground that the accused, both the brothers are threatening the petitioner and creating mental agony to him (the informant) and his family members and are putting unnecessary harassment and they are also bent upon for kidnapping the daughter of the informant. It is submitted that sessions trial is pending for trial. Learned counsel for the State submits that the impugned order has been passed in the year 1998 and much time has passed. The petitioner may move the learned trial court if any interference in the evidence or any threatening is given to the petitioner or the members of his family. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11867 of 1999 dt.02-09-2011 3 After hearing learned counsel for both the parties, it appears that the contention of learned counsel for the State is fair. Considering the facts and circumstances, both these applications are disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to raise his grievance before the learned trial Court. Patna High Court Dated 2nd of September 2011 N.A.F.R/Kanchan (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)