vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7622 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.7622 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.7622 OF 2008 Vidhyadhar Purshottam Datar ... Petitioner V/s. The Managing Director The Maharashtra State Farming Corporation Ltd. & anr. ... Respondents Mr.N.P. Deshpande for Petitioner Mr.S.R. Nargolkar for Respondent No.1 CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: APRIL 6, 2009 APRIL 6, 2009 APRIL 6, 2009 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . This petition has been filed by the Petitioner contending that the order passed by the appellate authority under the Bombay Government Premises Eviction Act 1955 should be set aside in view of the facts obtaining in the petition. 2. A similar petition had come up before this Court, namely, Writ Petition No.7226 of 2008 which was rejected. In view of the order passed in Writ Petition No.7226 of 2008, this writ petition is also rejected. It appears that the order in Writ Petition No.7226 of 2008 was challenged in Letters Patent Appeal No.35 of 2009. The Division Bench on 14.1.2009 has dismissed the Letters Patent Appeal alongwith other Appeals. : 2 : 3. Mr.Deshpande, appearing for the petitioner, seeks some time to vacate the premises. Although this prayer is strongly opposed by Mr.Nargolkar, in my opinion, it would be appropriate to grant the petitioner four weeks’ time to vacate the premises on furnishing the requisite undertaking. Undertaking to be filed within one week. The undertaking to state that the petitioner and the members of his family will vacate the service quarters within four weeks from today. No further extensions will be granted. 4. Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.