IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10906 of 2010 PRAMOD KUMAR, Son of Moti Rai, Resident of village Amnabad, P.S. Bihta, District Patna …… Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ….. Opposite Party ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Manu, Advocate For the State : Mr. Uma Shankar Pd. Singh, A.P.P. --- 2 08.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that petitioner is not the assailant rather one Raj Ballabh Rai is the assailant as would be evident from the first information report itself. Learned counsel further submits that there is a counter case also and injuries have been inflicted upon both sides. It is stated that there is admitted land dispute between the parties. Lastly it is contended that the petitioner was not assailant at best he could be a member of unlawful assembly. Petitioner is stated to be in custody since 4.1.2010. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, - 2 - the petitioner, PRAMOD KUMAR, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 295 of 2009. Petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of trial. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation then the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)