IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16691 of 2008 JAI PRAKASH SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.5.2008. Heard both sides. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case under sections 409, 420/34 of I.P.C. It is submitted that this petitioner is not at all responsible for misappropriation of any amount. According to the prosecution story, the amount up to 20.9.2006 has been misappropriated by the Accountant but this petitioner joined the post on 4.1.2007. In this regard, a report of the Deputy Collector (Establishment) has been submitted. It is further submitted that the learned Sessions Judge also has stated this fact in detail but unfortunately, no anticipatory bail was granted and the bail application was disposed of with observation. Considered the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner - 2 - N.H./ as well as the observation made on 17.12.2007 passed by the learned Sessions Judge. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, in case of arrest or surrender before the court below within four weeks of receipt of this order, petitioner, namely, Jai Prakash Singh is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Saran (Chapra) in Parsa P.S. Case No.67 of 2007, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. ( Ghanshyam Prasad )