IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36424 of 2010 1. DEVENDRA PRASAD YADAV @ DEVENDRA YADAV 2. Manohar Yadav Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 4/ 18.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Theft is said ornamental. Abuse in name of informant’s caste is against petitioner no.1 only that is also inside the telephone booth not in public view and parties have already settled their differences by filing compromise petition. Taking that into consideration, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Laukahi P.S. Case No. 14 of 2006 and G.R. No. 95 of 2006 above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Jhanjharpur (District-Madhubani) subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)