IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 21ST APRIL 2009 / 1ST VAISAKHA 1931 WP(C).No. 11753 of 2009(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. RAVIPRASAD,AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.RAMAKRISHNAN NAIR,"PRANAVAM HOUSE", "SOOLAPPARA KARA",VANDANMEDU VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK,IDUKKI DISTRICT. 2. SHEELA,W/O.RAVIPRASAD,AGED 48 YEARS, "PRANAVAM HOUSE","SOOLAPPARA KARA", VANDANMEDU TALUK,IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.A.C.DEVASIA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VANDANMEDU POLISE STATION, VANDANMEDU VILLAGE,UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, COLLECTORATE BUILDING, KUYILUMALA,PYNAVU,IDUKKI. 3. VASUDEVAN,AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, NARAKAMPOIKAYIL HOUSE,SOOLAPPARA KARA, VANDANMEDU VILLAGE,UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 4. SASIMON.K.T.,AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O.THANKAPPAN,KOLLAKUZHIYIL HOUSE, SOOLAPPARA KARA,VANDANMEDU VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK,IDUKKI DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.SREELAL N.WARRIER FOR R3&R4 SRI.B.RAGHUNANDANAN FOR R3&R4 G.P. SHRI.K.K.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN & ANTONY DOMINIC, JJ. ================== W.P(C).No.11753 of 2009 ================== Dated this the 21st day of April, 2009 J U D G M E N T Antony Dominic, J.: Essentially the prayer sought for in this writ petition is to direct respondents 1 and 2 to render necessary assistance to the petitioners to enjoy the benefit of Ext.P11, an order of injunction passed by the Munsiff's Court, Kattapana, in I.A.No.156/2009 in O.S.No.57/2009. Ext.P11 shows that respondents 3 and 4 herein and their men and agents, have been restrained from transpassing into the plaint schedule property and making any constructions on the eastern portion of the said property. The said order is in force. Although respondents 3 and 4 have undertaken before us that they have no intention to violate the said order, the apprehension of the petitioners is that attempt is being made in that direction. In view of this, taking into account the fact that Ext.P11 is still in force, we clarify that respondents 3 and 4 shall abide by the said order and that in case there is any attempt to violate the said order, it would be open to the petitioners to approach respondents 1 and 2, who shall render necessary assistance to the petitioners. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Sd/- sdk+ ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2