// HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH AT BILA8PUR PETmONER RESPONDENTS WMT PETETION (C) No. 4840 (€2068 , Kuhaj Singh S/o MalkeetSingh, aged about 36 years, R/o Maheridra Tra'uels,. Sandari Bu^ Stand, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (0.0.) Throu^i Power ofAtt<xnyi ^ ' Akashdeep Sii^h QU S/o Shri Lakhwaat Sin^i, Aged about 20 years^'RA}_%uRK Colony, Ra4nUr Distt. Raipur(C.G.) „.' VERSUS; , •„,•'" ;: aii:: : 1. State Oovt. of^Chhattisgarh, Through- Secretary, D.K.S. Bhawaii, Raigjir, ; Distt. Raipur(C.G.) . . 2. State Traasport Authoiity D.iK.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.)-- .a 3. Secretary, State Tramport AutBority D.K.S. Bhawan, Rai(»rDistt. - Raipur(C.G.> ~ - WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUnON OF INDIA . ''::.:'• ,,r ,,:':, • SB: Hon'Me Shri SattshK. Aanlhutal, J. w Present: Shri A^ay Shrivastava, Advoeat&feF thepe*itioneT. w . Slai Vinay Hartt, Depiity Affvoeate GeneralsBffi Shri Ipashank, Thaktir, Panel Lawyer fiwthe State/respondmts. » ORALORDER (Passed on 01st day of September, 2008) ; 1. With the consent ofthe parties, the matter is taken up fw hearing finally. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for fhe petitioner suhmits that fha petitioner has filed an apptication for graut ofstate carriage permit in August, 2008. The case of the petitioner has not been listed for considerati^ ia Ihe agaida. He farther submits that there are othar applieations with regard ti»fhesanae routes fw which the applieations have been made by the permit seekers. -3. There is no questicm of infraction of any statutory Rules aud Regdations. However, in view ofthe facts ofthe case, it is appropriate ifthe cotmnittee is directed to consider the case ofthe petitioner along wilfa fflther sunilarly situated applications, as early as possible, for a particular route to be i35@il ^SSSSS,: ,»-;^o.A"~^ l^"9®fe, g Y^-y ,^:"' -2- considared togestheT. and }»ssappropriate ordCT m aocordanee with law on its own merrts. 4. Shri Harit Eiubmits that if the applications have been made withia the prescribed time, if any, all the applications are necessaiy to be eonsidered for a partieular route in the agenda, togefher. 5. In view ofthe foregoing avennents uiade by leamed counsel for the parties, it is direoted that all Ifae applications for a par'icular raute shall be considered together in the agenda, wnefher applications are shown in the agenda or not The p'etition accordmgly stands disposed o£ No oirier asto costs. 6. Consequentiy, I.A. No. 01, application for mteriia relie( also stands disposedof. • 7. Certified copy, today itsetf. Sd/- SatjshK. Agnihotri Judge iw , Aniit