:1: :1: :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.308 OF 2006 Rama Krishna Kamble .. Appellant. Vs. Prakash Margu Kamble & Anr. .. Respondents. Mr.D.S.Sawant for the appellant. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. DATED : 11TH JULY, 2007. DATED : 11TH JULY, 2007. DATED : 11TH JULY, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the appellant. 2. This appeal challenges concurrent findings recorded by the courts below by which a suit filed by the respondents-plaintiffs for perpetual injunction has been decreed. It appears that the appellant claims possession over the suit property on the basis of an agreement of sale executed by the father of the plaintiff. The courts below after having taken into consideration the entire evidence on record have held that the defendant was never put in possession of the suit premises. Considering the concurrent findings recorded by the courts below and as I find sufficient material on record to sustain those findings and considering limited jurisdiction of this court to disturb the findings of fact in the second appeal this appeal fails and dismissed as such. :2: :2: :2: (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)