1 (WP 9595 of 2010) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9595 OF 2010 Bharati R. Punjabi ...Petitioner Vs State of Mharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents ----- Ms. Kranti S.S. Anand for Petitioner Mr.A.I. Patel-AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 Mr.Naraindas Santani-Respondent No.3(in person) ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 5th May, 2011 P.C. 1. The parties have settled the dispute. They have tendered the consent terms which are taken on record and marked 'X' for the purpose of identification. The consent terms are signed by the Petitioner and the by the Respondent No.3. It is also confirmed by the owners of the flat in question viz. one Janaki Naraindas Santani and Lalit Naraindas Santani. In view of the consent terms which are filed, the order is passed in terms of the consent terms. 2. I am informed that pursuant to the order passed by the Competent Authority, the Tahasildar, Ulhasnagar has sealed the premises. 3. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has also produced the true copy of the order passed by the 2 (WP 9595 of 2010) Competent Authority, in which it is stated that the applicant is permitted to withdraw the application since dispute is settled out of the Court. Writ Petition is, accordingly, allowed. Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn in view of the consent terms. 4. The Tahasildar, Ulhasnagar is directed to remove seal and hand over the possession to the son of the Petitioner-Harish Punjabi. Both, the Petitioner as well as the Respondent No.3 are present in the Court. Writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. (V.M. KANADE J.)