"y ^'^ . \"^\^" ^wv IN THE HIGH CQURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO, -Z7S?, /2002 PETITIONERS ^s"" ,^^0:"" DChandra Bhushan Pandey S/o Late R»s« Pandey, Aged about 40 years^ R/o Azad Nagar^ Mashanganj^ Bilaspur^ Distt^ Bilaspur< 2)G@pal Mishra s/© S.N. Mishra, Aged ab©ut 39 years^ B/o Opp^Khaparganj School^ Lajpat Rai Nagar^Bilaspur Distt, Bilaspur (CG) • 3)Girish Yadav S/© Ram Narayan Yadav^ Aged about 41 years^ R/© Near the h©use ©f Shri Ashok Rae^Gondpara^ Bilaspur^ Distt<iBilas@ur (CG) 4)Basant Chouksey S/© Hariram Chouksey^ Aged ab©ut 38 years^ K/@ Near the Temple ©f Gh©ghababa| Bilaspur^ Blstt. Bilasjmr (03) <» | All are werkiag' as Leeturer posted at Lal Bahadur Shastri Higher secondary sch©@l^ Bilaspur^ Distt^ Bilaspur (CG)^ rr^ VERSUS RESPONDENTS x,.^ <q- ,\- 5 ,€)State of Ghhattisgarh Ihrough the Secretary^ Local Self Department^ DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG) < ^)The Director, Local Self Department^ Raipur (CG) • 3)Municipal Corporation Bilaspur Through the Commissioner^ Municipal Gorporation^Bilaspur<i WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2^1/227 QF TH£ CONSTITUYION OF IN D I A L- 1 lff:!- 1?'?iBK;|R|i^ISW HJGtLCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 2756 of 2002 Petitioner : Chaadra Bhushan. Paadey & others Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & ofhers Siaa^le Bench: Honlsle Mr. Justice Satish K. Aguihotri. Shri P,S, Koshy, Advocate for fhe Petitloners, Shri SushU Dubey, Deputy Goveromiexit Advocate for the respondeiits No. 1 and 2, Shri A,S. Kachwaba, counsel for the respondeut No. 3. ORAL ORDER (10thJuly, 2006) The present petition filed under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitation of India, seeks a writ of Diaadaoius/any ofher writ for grant of pay scale of fhe post of Lectarcr from fhe date fhe petitfoner was promoted on the post of Lecturcr. It was further prayed that fhe differcnce of salmy paM to the petitioiier and salary of fhe post of Lectiirer be also paid wifh mtercst to fhe petitioner. The relevaat facts m nutshell are fhat ixiitially fhe petitioners were appomted on fhe post of Upper Division Teacher on 21-7,1986 (Annexure A/1), 10.7.1986 (Annexure A/2), 8.7.1986 (Annexurc A/3) aad 24.8.1986 (Annexure A/4) respectively aiid subsequenfly, by order dated 9.11.1987 (Anuexure A/5) fhey were confirmed after obtaming approval from fhe Public Service Commission. /"1"^ 3. Thereafter, duriag pendency of this writ petition, the petitioners were promoted to fhe post of Lecturer from the post of Upper Division Teacher by order dated 16.7. 1997 (Amiexme A/9). 4. Learned counsel for fhe petitioaer submits fhat fhe identical issue iavolved in fhe case of Sm.t Kavita Tiwari Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & another in W.P. No. 4003 of 2003, was decided by this Court and the writ petitbn was atlowed wifh foUowmg direction :- "16, For fhe reasons stated above, fhe petition succeeds axid is aUowed. The respondent No. 3 is directed to pay ffae difference of salaiy of fhe pay, fhe petitioner was receiving from 16.7,1997 aad fhe pay of Lecturer, rcvised from time to time, tiU her date of retirement ie. 30th April, 2005, wifh iuterest at fh.e rate of6% per anniim-^ 5. Leamed couusel appearing for fhe rcspondents do not dispute fhe facts. 6. Bablu In view of fhe aforc-nieiLtioned reasons, fhis ^tition is also atlowed ia the terms of fhe order dated 29th March, 2006 passed by this Court m W.P. No. 4003 of 2003 (Smt Kavita Tiwari Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & aaother), No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge