IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 30TH AUGUST 2010 / 8TH BHADRA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 4996 of 2010() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.121/2006 OF CHANGANASSERY POLICE STATION AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN BA.4348/2010 Dated 21/07/2010 CRMP.1980/2010 of DISTRICT COURT, KOTTAYAM .................... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.3 ---------------------------------------------- NAZER, S/O.ABDUL KHADER, ANTHAMPARAMBIL VEEDU, 56TH MILE BHAGOM, PEERUMEDU VILLAGE, PEERUMEDU. BY ADV. SRI.SOJAN PAVIYANOSE RESPONDENT(S): STATE & COMPLAINANT ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHANGANACHERRY POLICE STATION. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. .................................................... Bail Application No.4996 of 2010 ..................................................... Dated: 30.08.2010 ORDER Petitioner, who is the 3rd accused in Crime No.121/2006 of Changanassery Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 302,109,120(B) read with 34 IPC seeks his enlargement on bail. The petitioner surrendered before the J.F.C.M on 1.7.2010. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the nature of the injury sustained and the other facts and circumstances of the case, if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) sj