HVN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 559 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 499 OF 2008 Smt. Iashabi Gulam Nabi Khan Pathan ..Appellant Versus The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.M.S. Kadu for the Appellant. Mrs. V.R. Bhosale, A.P.P. for State. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & K.U.CHANDIWAL,JJ. K.U.CHANDIWAL,JJ. K.U.CHANDIWAL,JJ. DATED: JUNE 09, 2008 DATED: JUNE 09, 2008 DATED: JUNE 09, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . This is an application for bail by the appellant who has been charged for the offence of committing murder of her husband. Apart from the appellant,there are two other accused who have been acquitted. It is only the appellant who has been convicted. . On behalf of the appellant, the learned counsel submits that this case is based purely on circumstantial evidence and there is no material evidence to link the death of the deceased with the accused. It was also submitted that the material on record would indicate that the deceased was a drunkard. We have considered the arguments advanced on behalf of the appellant by the learned counsel and also the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge. We find in the C.A.s report that the blood of group "AB" was found on the ‘kurta’ of the accused i.e. blood of deceased. Apart from that the recovery of assault weapon was made at the instance of the appellant on which also human blood was fond. In our opinion, this is not fit case to grant bail. Hence,application for bail rejected. (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.) (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.) (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)