^^7^^ (2) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARHAT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON (S) NO.^'656 /2006 PETTnONER .•••w** ^•<€-''..-•'' ^^ 1"<V-" .,<£" . , ><". .,&••' o- RESPONDENTS Rajendra Prasad Soni ^ S/o Shri Ram Bishal Soni Ageabout41 years.Asstt.Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Pachari (Tilda), Post - Kathiya No.-1, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. StateGovt. of Chhattisgarh ' Through: Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer y Raipur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTIQN QF IND1A Petitioner most humbly submit as under:- ^^^^^^^^^^^1;1 HI6H COURT OF CHHATTESeARH AT BILASPUR Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents W. P. (5) No. 5623 of 2006 Smt. Ishwari Pandey Versus State l5ovt. of Chhattisgarh <S another W. P. (5) No. 5624 of 2006 Ku. Sushila Verma Versus State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh & another W. P. (5) No. 5625 of 2006 Ku. 5h(Aeno Parveen Versus State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & another W, P, (5) No. B626 of 2006 Rajendr-a Prasad Soni Versus State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh & another W. P. (5) No. 5627 of 2006 Tok Singh Verma Versus State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh & another W. P. (S) No. 5628 of 2006 Ramgopal Chaturvedi Versus State ©ovt.of Chhattisgarh & another W. P. (S) No. 5629 of 2006 Smt. Sandhya Sharma Versus State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh & another W. P. fS) No. 5630 of 2006 Raftesh Kumar 5ahu Versus State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh <& another W. P. (5) No. 5631 of 2006 Versus Lakhon Lal Patel State 6ovt of Chhattisgarh & another Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents W. P.fS) No. 5632of 2006 Ku. Jeera Padhyay Versus State ©ovt.of Chhattisgarh & another And W. P. CS} No. 8633 of 2006 Sagar Ram Dahariya Versus 5'hate Govt. of Chhattisgarh & ono+her Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. JusticeSatish K. Agnihotri. Shri AJay Shrivastnva, Advocate for the Petitioners, Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. Advocate for respondents/State. OR & E R >ft (13th October, 2006) 1. Leamed counset appearing for the petitioners submits that white workin9 as Assistant Teachers, the petitioners have gone on training to improve their qualifications on their own expenses and acquired B. Ed./B.T.I. ;Ex<Mnination Certificate. 2. The present writ petitions, being W.P.(5) Nos. 5623/2006. 5624/2006,5625/2006,5626/2006,5627/2006,5628/2006, 5629/2006, 5630/2006, 5631/2006, 5632/2006 and 5633/2006 involve similarfactsand common question of law. TTius, these petitions are being disposed of by this common order. 3. According to learned counsel for the petitioners, -Hie petitioners are entitted to two advance increments in view of +he decision of this Court- in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipa! Corporation, &ur9 and another {2006 CEE) MPJR-C6 96}. This Court- in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipat Corporation, Ourg and cno-rtier (Supra), came to the conclusion that the teachers, who had obtained B.Ed./B.TJ. Examination Certifi'cate on his own expenses, are covered by the circular dated 24.12.98 issued by the State 6ovemment of Madhya Pradesh. 4. Leamed counsel for the petitioners further submits that the facts ond question of law invotved in the present case-s we squarely covered by decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kuma" Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), to which leamed counsel oppearing for the respondents fairly concedes ond agrees with the averment made by leamed counsel appearing for the petjtioners. 5. Accordingly, the writ petitions are allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwont Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and onother (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.TJ. Examination Cert-ificate on their own expenses or not. No order as to costs. 6. A copy of this order be plnced on record of other connected writ petitions. 5ubhash Sd/- Sadsh K. Agnihotri Judge