HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR w.P. (s) No. 7160 of 2007 e WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Apyearance: Shri U.K.S. Chandel, Counsel for the petitioner. Shri A.S. Kachhwaha, Govt. Advocate for the State on advance copy. oRAL ORDER (13.12.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a ermanent Gang-man is to be retired at the age of 62 years in accordance with the Chhattisgarh Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivarshiki—Ayu) Adhiniyam 1967 read with Fundamental Rules, 56. He also submits that the point raised has been decided by this Court in batch of matters i.e. WP. No.108/ 2005 and many other connected matters on 04.01.2007, reported in 2007 (2) C.G.L.J. 29 [Govind & Others vs. State of C.G. and \ / / p PETITIONER Rafiel, aged about 60 years, Son of Alvinus Ekka, Occupation — Gangman, Public Works D€partment— National Highway, Sub Division Jashpumagar, District Jashpur (C.G,) Versus RESPONDENW 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - the Secretaxy, Depaltment of Pubiic Works, Mantralay, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Executive Engineer, Department of Public Works, Division Ambikapur, District Salguja (C‘GJ 3. Sub Divisional (Minoan Deptt of Public Works, Sub Division Jashpur Nagar, District dasjpur (C.G.) 2 w.P4_&)_Nc.7160 of 2607 '2 Z others) and this matter is squarsly covered by that decision, which may b6 disposed ofon the same terms. Learned counsel for the State fairly agrees that this matter is covered by the said decision. However, he submits that in some matters the State has filed writ appeals. Unless some interim order is passed, merely on account of filing of the writ appeal, hearing of this writ petition cannot be kept in abeyance, when the matter is squarely covered by the said judgment. 1n the result, this petition is allowed. It is disposed of in terms of the order dated 04.01.2007 passed in W.P. No.108/2005 and other connected matters. No \ order as to cost. f’ ‘ Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Shyna ‘9 “I, i