IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.2927 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.05.2011 Anil Kumar . . .Petitioner Versus Shri Joginder Singh . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Subhash Ahuja, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.R.S. Randhawa, Advocate for the respondent. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will not pursue the revision petition on merits if some time is granted to him to vacate the demised premises. Hence, revision petition is dismissed on merits. He, however, prays for one year time to vacate the demised premises. On the contrary, learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that since the respondent is an old person and is required the demised premises for the purpose of marriage of his grandson, therefore, reasonable time may be granted to the petitioner for the purpose of vacating the demised premises. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, I find it appropriate to grant seven months time to the petitioner to vacate the demised premises. Petitioner is directed to handover the vacant possession to the landlord on or before 18.12.2011 subject to filing of an undertaking to the Rent Controller within a month from today and also clearing all the arrears of rent, if any due. The petitioner shall also keep on paying the rent of the ensuing months. It is made clear that in case of any violation of the undertaking, the petitioner shall be liable under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) MAY 18, 2011 JUDGE Vivek