v>. ,-^. ^?; KC6H COURTOF CHHATTESSARH AT BE-ASP WritPetition fQ No. 4142 of2Cfflg Petitioriers Respondents Jf.. 1. Institution of Educational Society, Through : Qiairman - 5atish Puri, 5/o. Late Rameshtiur Puri, Age.fi about 43 years, Kurud Kuhka Rqod, BhHai, Oisrr. Durg (C.6.) 2. Puri Industrnt Truining Institute, Through : birector - Satish Puri, 5/0. La-te Rameshwar Puri, Aged about 43 years, KuNd Kohka Road, Bhilai.biSft. t)urg(C.6.) Versus 1- State of Chhatti^arh 'nirough; 5ecretary, DepartmenT of Technical Education, D.K.5. Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.) 2. The Director, Technicai Education, Bairon BazcB-, Raipyr C.6. 3. OirectQrate, Employment & Troining (State Bocird of Exdmjnation), Througk ; birector, Bairan Bazar, Raipur (C.6.) 4. Jhe &irector: 6eneral of Employnient & Trainin9, Shram SakTiBhayan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi. W&rTPETTTON UNtsER ARTICLE 226 OF THE €ONSTTFUTI©N^FlNt»IA. Sing!e Bench ; 1-ion'blaMr- Sntish K. Agnihotri. J- Siri Anand Kumar Tiwari, Advocate for the petiTioners. Shri Alok Bakshi, 6ovt. Advocate for the respondents No-1 to 3. Ma Sharmila Singhai, Assis-i-ant Soliritor Senerol fui- the r^qiondent No.4. Shri J. R. Verma, Adyoca'te for the upplicants, seaking intervention. ORAL ORDER (Passed on thisS* cloyof August, 2008) . 1. With the consent pf iearned counsel appearing for the parties, the mattei'is heardfina!!y. • ^^^^^^. 2. 3. 4. 5- 6. Thflkur Learned counse! appearing for the petj+iunet's aubtitits that the petitioners" insti-hj+ion is affiiiated oniy' for the fitler and masoh The respondents No. 1 to 3 have admitted in their retum •that the petitioriers' institutian ss haying offijiu'i'ion for 8. units of fitter trade and 2 units of mason trade- Any othei' studentsadmitted ih o'rtiei- tmdea cannot be perinitted to uppear in •i'he eKairiinatjon. The gtudents ffom fitter trade have been uclniitted •to r-eyi'iar exarriinations, as Uiell as to the supplemen'i'ai^ exaniinations held in Jin-iuary- 200S €MdJuiy- ZOOS, The-result in css& of supplementory- exatninntion heid in Ju!y, 2008 is fl»iiaited. Tn the iight of the obove no interim reliefcan be granted u+ this stage- The appiication for interim reiief (I.A.Np.l) is rejected. In view of 1+ie foreyoing, leamed counse! appeoring for the petitioners submita'Hiat +he petitioners do not pres^ prayer clqyse a), b) and e) in this petition. With regard to pniyer ctause d) the petitioners seek perinis^ion to fiie a sepsr'ate better petition, to which leomed £:isunsel appearing for tiie respective redpondents havs.no uhjection. In viexi of ti-ie obove, this petition js dismissed wifh the aboye- Stated iiberty. "~~~~ Satish K. Agiuftotri Judge ^w' .;=]3feS=