IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6594 of 2008 SHATRUGHAN MAHTO, SON OF BHARAT MAHTO RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHATHH, P.S. ROSERA, DISTT. SAMASTIPUR. ------ PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SITA DEVI, WIFE OF LATE DAMODAR DAS RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHATHH, P.S. ROSERA, DISTT. SAMASTIPUR. ------ OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 5. 29.4.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 12.1.2008 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Rosera, Samastipur, in Sessions Trial No. 688 of 2005 by which it has refused to discharge the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he was not named in the First Information Report but subsequently, charge sheet was submitted against him despite there being no cogent material. Considering that at the stage of framing of charge the court is not to hold a mini trial nor sift the evidence of the prosecution, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The application is dismissed. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)