1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.1198/2009. The State of Rajasthan and Others. VERSUS M/s.Rajasthan Construction Company. 15.04.2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.Hari Bareth, Deputy Government Counsel. Mr.Shyamlal Sharma, for the respondent. ***** Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission which has been raised before this court was in respect of Issue No.4 that the learned Arbitrator has erred and misconducted himself in allowing the claim under Issue No.4 for extra item claimed by the Contractor-respondent in respect of lead which was allowed by the learned Arbitrator on the ground that under the terms of the contract, the Contractor was required to bring the stone from the quarry at Lalsot but on account of stay order being in force, the department altered the position and directed the Contractor to bring the stone from Suvasa quarry and the distance being more, the Contractor has been awarded the difference for the amount as extra item on account of difference in the distance between Lalsot quarry and Suvasa quarry from the sites. It is not in dispute that there was an order of stay and on account of which the department itself has altered the quarry site from Lalsot to Suvasa. 2 In the facts and circumstances, therefore, I find no reason to interfere with the impugned award and the order passed by the learned District Judge. Consequently, the appeal as well as the stay application stand dismissed summarily. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.