1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.854 OF 2010 Shri.Madanbhai Chhagan Sura .. Petitioner V/s Shri.Maruti Govind Kadam since deceased per L.Rs and Ors. .. Respondents Mr.J.S.Deo for the petitioner. Mr.S.A.Abhyankar for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. DATE: 25th November, 2010. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. The challenge is to the concurrent orders passed by the Agricultural Lands Tribunal, Appellate Authority and the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal. 2. The petitioner is one of the landlords. The proceedings were initiated under section 32G of the Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 at the instance of the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. An order fixing the price was passed by the Agricultural Lands Tribunal, which has been confirmed in the appeal and in the revision. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that there was no evidence adduced to show that the 1st and 2nd Respondents were in possession of the said land on 1st April, 1957 which is the tiller’s day under the said Act. He submitted that in the absence of evidence, no order could have been passed in favour of the 1st and 2nd Respondents. 4. The concurrent findings of the authorities is that the name of the father of the 1st and 2nd Respondents was recorded as a tenant from the year 1946 in the tenancy register. No case of surrender of tenancy was made out by the 2 landlords. 5. In view of the concurrent findings of the authorities below, no case for interference is made out. Writ petition is rejected. (A.S.OKA, J.)