HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital the 18th September, 2008 First Bail Application No. 390 of 2008 Order on the bail Application of accused. Vakeel Ahamad ………. Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ………. Opposite Party _____________________________________________________________ Case Crime No. 27 of 2008 U/s 379 and 411 I.P.C. Police Station Kankhal District – Haridwar Hon'ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Heard Mr. Anuraj Bisaria, Advocate for the applicant; Mr. Nandan Arya, A.G.A. for respondent/State; and perused the record. It was contended by the learned counsel for the accused/applicant that there is no evidence against the accused/applicant except the vehicle to which the accused/applicant was driving. The accused/applicant was not in the conscious possession of the said property. It was further contended that the accused/applicant was in jail from 29/02/2008. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case; contentions of the learned counsel for the parties; and counter affidavit filed by the respondent, I find that it is a fit case for bail. Let the accused/applicant be released on bail on furnishing personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned. (J.C.S.Rawat, J.) Dated 18.09.2008 Shiv