HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION No.12509 of 2010 Dated: 15-06-2010 Between: Smt.Vidyadevi …Petitioner AND The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ranga Reddy District at Vikarabad R.R.District & Others. Respondents. This Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION No.12509 of 2010 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A.Gopal Reddy) Mother of Jagadish Kaag-alleged detenu filed this writ petition seeking writ of habeas corpus complaining that the respondent-police illegally detained her son from 30.5.2010 onwards and that so far the alleged detenu has not been produced before the concerned Magistrate and she is apprehending danger to his life. In response to the notice issued, the third respondent-Sub- Inspector of Police, Viakrabad Police Station filed a counter affidavit stating that a case in Crime No.1 of 2008 for the offences punishable under Sections 457, 380 r/w Section 411 I.P.C. has been registered against the alleged detenu who is arrayed as A.1. In connection with the said crime, the alleged detenu was taken into custody on 3.6.2010 basing on the confessional statement made by A.1 and A.2 in the crime, and that all the three accused were produced before the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Vikarabad on 4.6.2010, and that the learned Magistrate remanded the alleged detenu to judicial custody and accordingly, he has been lodged at Central Prison, Cherlapalli, R.R.District. Since the alleged detenu has been remanded to judicial custody by lawful orders, the petitioner cannot complain that the alleged detenu has been illegally detained by the police. Further when the alleged detenu was produced before the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Vikarabad, he not complained of any illegal detention by the police. Therefore, it is not necessary for us to go into the allegation that the alleged detenu was illegally detained from 30.5.2010 by the police. However, the petitioner or the alleged detenu, aggrieved by the illegal detention, if any, they can work out remedies before the appropriate forum. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ________________ A. GOPAL REDDY, J. __________________ JUNE 15, 2010 K.C. BHANU, J. Tsr.