IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR WRIT PETITION N03 -' 3:2790? 1995 PETITIONERS : / f 1. Nagar Panchayat, Bodri, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur, through its President o 2. Lami Narajan Dubey son bf Shri Mukhiahand Dubey, aged 38 years, President, Nagar Panahayat Bo’dri, Tah. Bilhanmistrict Bilaspur. / V8. RESPONDENTS : State of Madhya Pradésh through the Local self Gavernment Department , Bhopal . Deputy Director, Urban ‘ Administratiam , Bilaspur . Sub Divisicnal afficer (Revenue) Bilaspur. Shri P.P.Sharma,san of not knovm, aged about 48 years, r/a Gandpara, Bilaspur. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CGNS’I‘TI‘UTION BETA ILS OF PETITION HIGH COURT OF CHHA’I'I‘ISGARH A’I‘ BIIEASPUR WP. N0. 3274 6f 1995 SB: Hon’ble Mr. ORDER { Passed on this 19th day of February, 2007) The following order of the Court is passed by Satish K. mihotri, J. 1. The petitioners have tiled this petition challenging the order dated 9th F‘ebmmy, 1995 (Annexnre P/4) whereby the respemient No.5 was transferred from Gandai to Becki 2. The petitioners had sent a letter dated 4.8. 1995 (Annexure P/ 2) to the respondent No, 1 to the effect that there would be problem in drawl of payment of the respondent No.5 and copy of the transfer order dated 9.2.1995 was not endorsed to the petitioners. The petition was admitted on 17.10.1995 but no stay was granted. v 1t, 3.‘ Be that as it may, it is apparent that with the passage of time this petition has become infxuctuous. However, the respondents are at liberty to pass appmpftate order on the letter dated 4.8. 1995 (Annexure P/ 2). 4. it is? for the employer] State to transfer its employee/onion in the public interest and in administrative exigency. The petitioners cannot question a transfer only on the ground that there would be pmblem in drawl of salary of the transferred employee. sw— l SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI t Judge ‘ 5. 1n view of the above, this petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. A Thakur None for the for the petitioners. Miss Sunita Jain. Panel Lawyer for the respondents] State. Petitioners Nagar Panchayat, Bodri anothcr Versus Respondents State of Madhya Pradesh (new 8r. othc1$ Chhattisgarh) 8r.