<c £ <:^'^^ ^•<^^" > "y~ '.^~ .^•••~ .^>%'c/^° ^1" about 27 Singh Pate! ipali, 1- Ram Kumar Patel, aged years, S/o Shri Chhattar rsident of Village Chhuh P.O.Baramke^a, Disirict (Chhattisgarh) Dev Kumar Patel, aged about 24 years, S/o Saheb Rsm Patei, resident of Bade Amakoni, P.0. Gobarsingha, Tehsil Sarangarh, Djstrici Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) Vidyanand Pandey, aged about 31 years, S/o Hari Prasad Pandey, resident of villaae and P. O. Gobarsingha, Tehsi! Sarangarh, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) Ssate of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of School Edycation, Mantralaya, DKS Building; Raipur(Chhattisgarh) Janpad Panchayat, Baramkela through its Gbief Executive Officer at iaramxela, District Raigarh 3. Additionai Coilector, Raigarh District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) 4. District Education Officer, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) v»»^' sn^iv (<•<!* WI Sii^B S>*ii* 'S^T'^IFiIcTq, •eSifll'M'IS, faclj^y .MS..^HW^ sn^i ww ('^f3«i^t; appointi4ent fflie 18/6/2003 Shri Prashant Mlshr^., State by Shri Gautafn respondents no. 1,3 and instructions of Shri respondent no.2. Heard. Tliis petition is flled though they have been Grade-III but the Leamed counsel for wherein it is stated thatl 11/10/1999 (Annexm-e-P/1 appointuient orders could The petitioners have Counsel for the representation. Having considered fhe merits of the case, tti justice wiU be served if a make the detailerl petition, within 15 days being ffled, the competenjt ir^., counsd. for the petltloners. Bhaduri, Dy. Advocate General, for as weU as respondent no.2 on fhe Rfcnbir Singh Marhas, counsel for s^lected ttl Gt.PRJ. |by the petitioners on the groiind that for the post of Shiksha Kanni order has not been issued. H petitioners refers to Annexure-P/5, in pursuance to the circular dated p) issued by the State Govemment the Inot be issued. |not made any representatlon. petitioners wants time to file ahd without expressing any opinion on the opiruon of fhls Court, ends of |direction is given to the petitioners to reprejientations alongwith a copy of the today and on such representations jt aulhority shall declde (tie same In fr<biu 00. ES!" 'ysf'sMRTT, ®fl1y'ie,(stwi'H.y ^...M.f..Mik±.... S^V •q?q? (ipfg^tT; accordance wifh law wifchin production of representatijon. petitioners may challenge With the aforesaldj disposed of. In vicw of thc No. 1091/2002 also stand c .^.. two inonths froin the date of i. if any adverse order is passed the Ithe same ui-accordance with law. observatlons, this petition stands ajbovc, M.W.P. No.558/02 and I.A. (lisposed of. Sdi- Fakhruddin Judge Gi. I; :i. aE^.^ti^iE&^'T?*^^ i;:%l^."^y-iti-,^%A':i^rf.',;t^w'!1^^ -8,Sfer.^'^.:li»;^hAsi^i£Si.;-.^;,f:t3J