9 N' .7y R—78 1 ' O,,A tii'siilyiN; I ;WSI 'WV WWil th*ll<h ysr -<ii<<ii?t<4, ®til<H4is,[si<aiy^< ..D..P.CJ.2H(..'...^..a.^. STI^I TT5RT (ll^Fj°l<S':I) TCiIWflfpISII^I PBTITIONER Dwfcri-ka age Pait (C<}) Prasad Sahii, S/o Auaadram Sahu, about 42 years, R/o ViUage Paviii, Ftost IfDi, Police Station Bilaigarh, District Kaipur :eld RBSPONDBNTS 1. Stat. ThKfu Kng(n< of Chhattisearh, ^ugh Secretary, Departnient of Public Healfh ^neering, UKS Bhawan, Kaipur (CU) 2. The Divi 3. The Eng 4. The | BUat; Writ Petition under S.B Hon-'ble Shri DhireiNdra Mishra, J. 30-09-2008 Mr.PP Sahu, counsel Mr. Ajay Dwivedi, D^ Grievaace of the petj Paachayat, Bilaigarh, Dis^ <M^[^<lll •Wicil ^f l^st ^f^i^K ^siRiiisn^i Versus Executi.ve Enguieer, ion Raipur (CG) Pubtic Health Sub- Assistaut Engiaeer, PubUc Health ,|iieeruig, Sub-Division Baloda Bazar (CG) Chief Executi.ve Of&cer, Jaapad Panchayat atgarh, District Raipur (CG) ^lrticle 226 ofthe Constitution otladia for tlie petitioner. GA for the State/respondents. tioner is tliat he was working under Jaupad fc. Raipur as daily wage employee vide order of Annexure P/1 datec^ 10.4.1997. Subsequently, fhe work of mauitenance of hand pitjnp aad tube well, provided by the Jaapad Pauchayat in various vill^ges, was hauded over to the PubUc Healfh Enguieeruig Departaient i^i the year 1999. Accorduigly, services offhe -lietitioner were also ta.ken[over by the Pubti.c Health Enguieermg Deptt. of fhe State Govt. aad siface then. he was workuig under the PubUc )~ li^ W.},\ BiBS lllf^'Wl •^••S^^S^^^^-^.SB.&la&s^iiS^:^^^^^^^•••^W'.StWl ~3~^ "41<ll<rltl, s>'tlly'lis, fqcll'<4li< *<M<tl tbNleh SII^T '75RT (ijqfg^T) TCiiw^fCTaii^r .Z-. Health Engmeering Deptjt. tin 3 Ist December, 2007. However, his services have been disco4tiuued fi-oin 01st Januaiy, 2008 without any formal order ia this res Circular dated 5dl March i|rd. In the ineauwhile, the State Crovt. vide 2008 has decided to regularize the services of the daily wage ad hjsc einployees, who are appoiated between 1.1.1989 aad 31. 12.19971 Leained Qouasel pressiag this petition at respondents to apply for fhe petition is disposed of is disposed of with li| concei-aed conipetent ^raferiN wraf if fs'st <fi((d« ^•aifinan^r br the petitioner subnuts that he is not fhis stage. However, he prays for Uberty to niake a detailed represei(tation before the coinpetent autiiority ofthe reappouitment aad regularization iu view of Circular dated 5th Marctt, 2008, which may be deeided on its own inents, ia accordance wifb law. Shri Ajay Droivdi, l^anied Dy GA for fhe State has 110 objection if with the aforesaid Uberty. In view of above s^bmissions of the pardes, the iastant petition eriy to ftie petitioner to file a detailed representatiou for rea^pointinent aad regiilarization before the ufhority of the State Govt. On such representation beuig Giei^, the same shaU be decided ou its own nierits in accordance with law, jrifhui a period Of fhree inonths froiu the date ofreceipt of such repres^itation. jy. S(V- Dhirendra Mishra Judge