IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18619 of 2011 RAMJEET MAHTO @ RANJIT MAHTO, RABINDRA MAHTO, SIKANDAR MAHTO, MITHUN MAHTO, SHAIL DEVI AND LAKSHMINIYA DEVI. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 14.06.2011. After having heard Sri Mukesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Sri Parmeshwar Mehta, learned counsel appearing for the State what this court desires is that the petitioners surrender and pray for regular bail specially when co-accused Jitendra Mahto, who bears a bit graver allegation of dealing a farsa blow on the head of the father of the informant, has been admitted to bail by the learned Sessions Judge in B.P.No.1592 of 2010 which statement appears in paragraph-10 of the present petition. It is to be pointed out to the learned C.J.M., Chapra that if, in any case an accused, has been admitted to bail by any superior court, the case of other similarly situated accused persons has also to be considered and an order in favour of such an accused has to be passed in the light of the order of bail passed by any superior court. Merely because the court of C.J.M. or the Sessions Judge has rejected the prayer 2 for bail could never be sufficient for rejecting the prayer of other accused. The court believes that the C.J.M. shall appreciate the position as pointed out to him and admit the petitioners to bail as and when the prayer for bail is made before him without being prejudiced by any order of rejection passed against him. With the above direction, this petition stands disposed of. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha,J.)