^. '<n\^ Petitioners Respondents <&• ^y^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH: BILASPUR Wnt Petition (SLNo^ 15 of 2008 1) Smt. Sunita Singh, W/o. Yuvraj Singh, Aged about 47 years, Assistant Teacher, Primary Schoo! Muimula, Block Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Ghampa (CG). 2) Smt. Rekha Singh, W/o. Chudaman Singh, Aged about 49 years.Assistant Teacher, Primary School Muimula, Block Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa Versus 1) State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, School Educational Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (CG). 2) The Director, Public Instructions, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (CG). 3) DistrictEducation Officer, DistrictJanjgir- Champa(CG). 4) Biock Education Officer, Block - Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa (CG). QA/rit Petition under Artide 226 ofthe Constitution of India) SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Uttam Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Arvind Dubey, Panei Lawyer for the State. ORALORDER (Passedon 4th January, 2008) The petitioners were initially appointed on the post of Assistant Teacher on the fixed pay scale of Rs.150/- and after compietion of two years probation period, the petitioners were granted regular pay scale. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as we!) as the respondents/State jointlysubmit that this case is squarely covered bythe orderdated 12-2-2007 passedby thisCourtinWritPetition (S) No. 813 'H- of 2007 (Ram Kumar Sahu & others Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & another). They furthersubmit that this case may atso be disposed of in the same terms. 3) In viewof the above submission made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, this petition is allowed in the same terms. However, this ordershall be subject to all verifications made by the State regarding facts pleaded in the petition. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge '--] ^l&i.