IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH W.P. No.10903 of 2009 Between: Sanjay Prasad, S/o.late Narayana Prasad, Aged 42 years, Occ:Business, R/o.H.No.3-102, Narsingi Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, R.R.District. … Petitioner And The Officer-in-charge of Public Information Office, Under the Right ot Information Act, 2005, Golconda Mandal, Hyderabad and another. … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH W.P. No.10903 of 2009 ORDER: This writ petition has been filed seeking for issuance of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not issuing certified copies of (i) Notification No.E/3621/2008, dated. 06.12.2008, (ii) Proceedings dated 29.11.2008, (iii) Pahanis, (iv) Khasra Pahani and (v) No-PT Certificate from the year 1952 till date, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 1st respondent to forthwith issue the aforementioned certified copies as sought for by the petitioner vide applications dated 07.04.2009 and 17.05.2009. The main grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that in response to his representation, dated 07.04.2009, addressed to the 1st respondent, wherein the petitioner sought for the documents stated hereinabove, the 1st respondent issued Memo Lr.No.C/693/2009, dated 29.04.2009 stating that the concerned file bearing No.E/3621/2008 is not traced out and to know the status of the file, the D.R. is basis and the said D.R. for the year 2008 has been seized by the ACB officials and upon verification, with the then Tahsildar, he has informed that he will make attempts to trace and hand over the file within three days. Assailing the same, the present writ petition has been filed. The petitioner also filed WPMP. No.16970 of 2009 seeking to implead the Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and the Director of Anti Corruption Bureau, Mojamjahi Market as respondents 3 and 4 in the writ petition. This Court on 04.06.2009 ordered notice before admission and on 03.08.2009, in WPMP. No.16970 of 2009, permitted the learned counsel for the petitioner to take out personal notice on the proposed respondent No.4 and to file proof of service. On 17.08.2009, WPMP.No.16970 of 2009 was directed to be posted after service of notice on proposed respondent No.4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that subsequent to filing of WPMP. No.16970 of 2009, implead petition, some documents have been received by him. The learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent submitted that consequent to trace out file No.E/3621/2008, the documents, as sought for by the petitioner in his representation dated 07.04.2009, have been provided, as stated in Memo Lr.No.C/693/2009, dated 29.04.2009, and no further orders are required to be passed in this writ petition for which, the learned counsel for the petitioner is not disputed. In view of the above, recording the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________________ JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH Date: 15.07.2010 LSK