IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No. 22877 of 2011 Date of decision December 13, 2011 Raj Kumar ....... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- None for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner even at the second calling. At the previous date of hearing I had called upon the petitioner to explain as to how a second revision is possible against the statutory appeal which was disposed of by the Appellate Authority. There is no ground made for interference. Again this Court cannot be used as merely a forum to seek directions against authorities to pass interim orders. It shall be left to the petitioner to seek appropriate redress before the authority where he thinks he has a competency to file the revision. 2. The writ petition is dismissed. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE December 13 , 2011 archana