IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.22156 of 2011 Jai Lal Mahto son of Gariba Mahto Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3/ 23.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was refused bail by order dated 24.03.2011 vide Cr. Misc. No.8467 of 2011 since he was named in the confessional statement of the co-accused, who was caught right after the occurrence. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail on the ground that similarly placed co-accused has been granted bail by this Court. However, considering that on merits this Court has refused bail, I am not inclined to review the earlier order. Prayer for bail is once again rejected. The report of the Trial Court shows that case has now been committed to the court of Sessions. In such view of the matter, the petitioner is given liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge provided his case is not bifurcated for the purpose of charge. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)