IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40406 of 2010 NURUL HODA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 23.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Torture is for demand of dowry. Marriage is of the year of 2007. Earlier Complaint Case No. 1056 of 2009 decided in acquittal on compromise. Complainant started to reside to his in-laws again. The same allegation is levelled in which torture is for demand of dowry may never be believed for refusal of anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 2080 of 2009, Trial No. 3476 of 2010 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Bettiah, Dist- West Champaran subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. Ibrar/- ( Mandhata Singh, J.)