IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.35387 of 2011 ====================================================== Bablu Pandit @ Babloo Pandit .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== 2 25-10-2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband of the deceased is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The marriage was performed in the year 2006. In the F.I.R. the suspicion was raised against the father of the petitioner who used to have evil eye on the victim as a result, the petitioner was not named in the F.I.R. From the F.I.R., it appears that the learned Sessions Judge rejected the bail application of the petitioner only on the ground that the petitioner is husband of the deceased and the investigation is at early stage. Considering the fact that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and during the investigation, only suspicion has been raised, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Khodawandpur P.S. Case No. 98/2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Amrendra Kumar/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)