1 908.chs-69-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi SUIT NO. 575 OF 2004 WITH SUIT NO. 2673 OF 2003. M/s. Omkar Realtors & Developers (Bhoiwada) Private Limited. ..Plaintiffs. vs. Autoriders (India) Private Limited & Ors. ..Defendants. WITH SUMMARY SUIT NO. 2803 OF 2004. M/s. Omkar Realtors & Developers (Bhoiwada) Private Limited. ..Plaintiffs. vs. Autoriders (India) Private Limited. ..Defendants. .... Mr. Mukesh Jain, for Plaintiffs. Mr. Simeen Shaikh, for Defendant No.1. Mr. Sidharth Nair, i/b. Devendra Pantekar, for Defendant No.2. Mr. Rakesh Patel, for Defendant No.3/Applicant. .... CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 6TH MAY 2011. P.C. : By consent of the parties, the Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Amendment to be carried out in the course of the day. Re-verification of the Plaint is dispensed with. 2. The learned Advocates appearing for the parties have now tendered consent terms dated 6th May 2011. They submit that the consent terms be taken on record and Suit No. 575 of 2004, Suit No. 2673 of 2003 and Summary Suit No. 2803 of 2004 be disposed 2 908.chs-69-11 of in terms thereof. 3. The consent terms are taken on record. The same are signed by the parties and their respective Advocates. All the signatories to the consent terms are present in Court. All the above three Suits are disposed of in terms of consent terms. Refund of Court fees, if any, as per Rules. [ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ]