IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 239 OF 2009 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 85 OF 2009 SHRI RAMDAS SONU KANDOLKAR AND 3 ORS. ... Applicant Versus THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER AND ANR. ... Respondent Mr. P.A. Kholkar,Advocate for the Applicant. Coram:- R. M. SAVANT, J. Date:- 25th November, 2009 P.C. The above appeal has been admitted by an order passed today. The appeal is directed against an order passed in the review application filed by the respondents by which they said review application came to be allowed and the decree passed in Regular Civil Suit No. 76/2006 came to be set aside. Prima facie from the impugned order it can be seen that the court in exercise of the review has gone in threadbare finding of the trial court while passing the decree and thereafter allowed the said review application. The question that arises is therefore whether such a order could have been passed in exercise of the review jurisdiction. Hence, interim relief in terms of prayer Clause (a) of the civil application. This civil application accordingly is made absolute in terms of prayer Clause (a). R. M. SAVANT, J. MF/-