IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 21456 of 2005 Between: Hameeduddin Ahmed, S/o.Late Faseeshuddin Ahmed, R/o.H.No.1-2-559, Domalguda, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Tank Bund, Hyderabad. 2 The Chief City Planner, Town Planning Section, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Tank Bund, Hyderabad. 3 The Assistant City Planner, Circle VI, Town Planning Section, Municipal Corp of Hyd, Abids, Hyderabad. 4 Mohd.Monuruddin, S/o.Mohd Jahangir, R/s.11-3-959/3, New Mallepally, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents 1, 2 & 3 to discharge their duties under provisions of Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad Act, 1955 and demolish the illegal construction in Plot No.5-9- 29/1, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad in pursuance of Notice dt.6-6-1994 under 452 of HMC Act, 1955 and consequently declare the inaction of the Respondent 1, 2, and 3 in not taking any action in pursuance of issuance of Notice under section 452 of HMC Act, 1955 and dismissal of consequential Civil Suit in O.S.No.607 of 1994 dt.28-9-2000, on the file of the 1st Senior Civil Judge, City civil Court, Hyderabad, as malafide, illegal and further hold Respondents 1,2 & 3 have colluded with respondent No.4 in perpetuating illegality by not discharging their statutory duties under the Provisions of MCH Act, 1955 and also direct the1st Respondent to initiate diciplinary proceedings against those employees who have colluded with 4th Respondent in violating the provisions of MCH Act, 1955 by perpetuating illegal construction in premises No.5-9-29/1, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad , in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.SUDHAKAR REDDY & ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent No.: . The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI W.P.NO.21456 of 2005 ORDER Since there was no representation for the petitioner on 23- 01-2009 the matter is listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today none appeared for the petitioner. Hence the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. _____________ G.ROHINI,J 30th January 2009 *TSNR