1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.519 of 2006 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.218 OF 2006 Shantaram T. Sarfare, .. Applicant Vs State of Maharashtra, .. Respondent Mr Chetan Akerkar, for the applicant. Mr S.V.More, APP for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 13th JUNE, 2006 DATED : 13th JUNE, 2006 DATED : 13th JUNE, 2006 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent. 2. By this application, the applicant is seeking to recall of the order of admission of the appeal which came to be admitted after granting leave vide order dated 14.2.2006. According to the applicant, the section mentioned in the operative part of the order as 498 of IPC was a serious error in the order. In fact the applicant was charged, tried and acquitted of the offence punishable under section 498A and 494 of IPC. I perused the judgment. In the body of the judgment, the section is correctly quoted and, therefore, the prayer for recall of the order of admission is devoid of any merit. Hence, the application is rejected. 2 2 2 (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)