IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARILAL FRIDAY, THE 25TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 31044 of 2011(E) -------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------- BABU.K.C., S/O. CHATHUKUTTY, KIZHAKKE CHERUPARAMBIL, KATTOOR, PONCHANAM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH CHAKYAT RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KERALA STATE POLICE CHIEF, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, IDUKKI OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE IDUKKI THODUPUZHA-685584. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KATTAPANA, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685508. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KATTAPPANA, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685508. 5. GEORGE JOSEPH, PAKOLOMATTAM, MULANGATTIL, KATTAPPANA, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685508. SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SHYSON P. MANGUZHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 31044 of 2011(E) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS EXT.P1:- A COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 02/11/11 AND ITS POSTAL RECEIPT AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & K. HARILAL, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ W. P. C. No.31044 of 2011 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 25th day of November, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C. Kuriakose, J The State Attorney submits that instructions are yet to be received in this Writ Petition where the petitioner alleges that at the instance of the 5th respondent, the 3rd respondent/DYSP is harassing him. A reading of the averments in the Writ Petition and the various materials placed on record by the petitioner will show that the nature of the dispute between the petitioner and the 5th respondent is civil/contractual. According to us, such dispute falls outside the domain of the police. We dispose of the Writ Petition directing the 3rd respondent to refrain from intervening in the dispute between the petitioner and the 5th respondent which is civil and contractual in nature. The 3rd respondent and for that matter the 4th respondent will intervene only if the petitioner is accused of having W. P. C. No.31044 of 2011 -2- committed any offence. The Writ Petition is disposed of with the above directions. Sd/- PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE Sd/- K. HARILAL JUDGE kns/- //True Copy// P. A. TO JUDGE