IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30431 of 2009 CHANDAN KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2/ 02/09/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State of Bihar. The petitioner is the husband in custody in a police case under Section-498A of I.P.C. and 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. The submission is of the absence of any serious or heinous allegations. The court below rejected the prayer for bail on the reasoning that “the informant was brutally assaulted”. The allegations in the complaint are of slapping and generally assaulting. The order of rejection is in teeth of the orders of this Court for grant of bail in matrimonial matters in the judgement of this Court reported in 2006(3) P.L.J.R. 182 (Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Anr. Vs. The State of Bihar) and the judicial adventurism in respect thereof deprecated in the judgement of this Court reported in 2006(4) P.L.J.R. 342 (Ajay Kumar Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar). Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- 2 (ten thousand)along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Lakhisarai in Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 131/2009. Let a copy of this order be sent to the court below by the Court. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)