IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 6TH APRIL 2010 / 16TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 10891 of 2010(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- DR. SHEEJA.C.N. MEDICAL OFFICER, GOVERNMENT HOMOEO DISPENSARY, PALLIPPAD, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J. RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF HOMOEOPATHY, DIRECTORATE OF HOMOEOPATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DR. R.S.PRASANTH, MEDICAL OFFICER, GOVERNMNT HOMOEO DISPENSARY, NAGAROOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST. 4. DR. SUNITHA.G.S., MEDICAL OFFICER, GOVERNMENT HOMOEO DISPENSARY, DHARMADAM, KANNUR DIST. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.ARAVIND KUMAR BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 10891 of 2010 ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 6th day of April, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a Medical Officer in the Homoeopathy Department. Feeling aggrieved by Ext.P4 draft transfer list, the petitioner has submitted Ext.P5 objection. The apprehension of the petitioner is that the respondents would finalise Ext.P4 without considering Ext.P5. A perusal of Ext.P4 would reveal that the respondents themselves invited for objections from aggrieved employees. Therefore, there cannot be any reason for such apprehension. However, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 before finalising Ext.P4, in case it is already not finalised. Sd/- (C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge