IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-29522 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 17.11.2009 Nisha Rani @ Mamta and another ....Petitioner(s) vs. State of Haryana ....Respondent(s) *** CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH *** Present:- Mr.S.M.Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Yash Pal Malik, AAG, Haryana. Mr.Kuldeep Tiwari, Advocate for the complainant. *** AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. Counsel for the petitioners states that in compliance with the order dated 22.10.2009 passed by this Court, the petitioners have joined the investigation and are no longer required for the said purpose. Counsel for the State does not dispute this fact, on instructions from H.C.Dharam Pal, Police Station Pehowa, District Kurukshetra. He further submits that as of now the petitioners are not required for any purposes. Counsel for the complainant vehemently opposes the grant of concession of bail to the petitioners on the ground that they are active participants in the commission of the offence. He further states that an undertaking was given by the co-accused before the trial Court which has not been honoured by them. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the undertaking which was given by the co-accused Ramesh Kumar, has already surrendered Crl.Misc.No.M-29522 of 2009 (O&M) -2- and is in custody. He submits that petitioner No.1 is a lady and petitioner No.2 is only related to Ramesh Kumar and is a student. I have heard counsel for the parties and have gone through the records of the case. In view of the fact that petitioner No.1 is a lady and petitioner No.2 is a student and that they have joined investigation and are not required for investigation purposes as of now, order dated 22.10.2009 is confirmed. The petitioners shall, however, be bound by the provisions as contained under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. November 17, 2009 ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) poonam JUDGE