1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.2 of 2008. [Yuwraj Yashwant Humne] vs. [Chitkala Zutshi Home Secretary, The State of Maharashtra, thro Home Deptt. Mumbai & another] ---------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances,Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Petitioner in person. Coram: A. H. JOSHI, J. Dated: 20th FEBRUARY 2008. 1. The petitioner states that the Judicial Order dated 1-12-2007 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class Kamptee to be wilful1 disobedience of orders passed by this Court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. 2. According to him, the dictum contained in various decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court has not been followed. The petitioner states that the respondent no.1 is a formal party and there is no allegation of contempt against her. 2 3. What is stated and averred in para 16 are the grounds on which the impugned order could be challenged before the Higher Forum. The allegations contained in para 18 are as follows : 18...................... A specific directions given & positive observations made in the following Judgments, the Respondent No. 2 had not implemented the Judgments in its true spirit and purport. [Quoted from page 6 of the Contempt Petition Paper Book.] 4. Even if the statement contained in the petition is accepted, there is no willful disobedience of the order of the Court. 5. Contempt Petition has no merit. It is dismissed. JUDGE Sbm