IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH MAY 2010 / 5TH JYAISHTA 1932 WP(C).No. 16196 of 2010(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- JOSE ANTONY, S/O.BAPPU, AGED 61 YEARS, KANNANKERY HOUSE, KUMBALANGY VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.SABU GEORGE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KUMBALANGY GRAMA PANCHAYAT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KUMBALANGY, ERNAKULAM. 2. C.R.DILEEP, S/O.C.V.RAJAN, AGED 40 YEARS, CHADAYANGAD HOUSE, KUMBALANGY P.O., ERNAKULAM. SHRI S.SHANAVAS KHAN, SC, FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.16196/2010-Y ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 26th day of May, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner has filed this writ petition aggrieved by Ext.P13, a copy of the decision taken by the Committee of the Panchayat. The petitioner has narrated in the writ petition, various disputes with the second respondent including the pendency of a civil suit as well as the interim order passed therein. It is unnecessary to go into those details since the resolution of the Panchayat which is sought to be quashed in this writ petition does not affect any rights of the parties including that of the petitioner. 2. Ext.P11 is a copy of a Judgment rendered by this Court in a writ petition filed by the second respondent seeking for a direction to consider Ext.P1 representation produced therein. This Court has directed the Panchayat to consider the same and pass orders thereon if the same has been received, making it clear that any such order shall only be with notice to the second respondent, who is the petitioner herein. 3. The Panchayat has taken a decision pursuant to the Judgment and decided to approach the Taluk Surveyor to survey the thodu. According to the learned counsel for the W.P.(C). No.16196/2010 -:2:- petitioner, this amounts to a decision by the Panchayat to overview the orders passed by the Civil Court. A reading of the resolution shows that they have only decided to approach the Taluk Surveyor to survey the thodu in question. It will not affect any of the rights of the petitioner. 4. The learned Standing Counsel for the Panchayat submitted that no final decision has been taken by the Panchayat so far and a decision will be taken only after hearing the parties including the petitioner. The same is recorded and the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms \\TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE