1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR M.C.A.NO. 1184/2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3494/2009 ( 1.Smt. Prabha Shyam Pande and others -: versus :- Central Bank of India.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND F.M. REIS, JJ. DATED : OCTOBER 16, 2009. Heard Shri Anil Kumar, learned Counsel for the applicant. He states that only clarification sought in by him, is that the consideration of I.A.No. 115 and 116 of 2008 by the D.R.T. is not eclipsed or influenced by any observations made by the D.R.A.T. We find that this observation is already made by us in order dated 15.09.2009. We have only found that, that was in accordance with the submissions made by Shri Samel, learned Counsel for respondent Bank. In view of this, we find that clarification sought by Shri Anil Kumar, learned counsel is really unnecessary. As there are no other arguments advanced, Misc. Civil Application is disposed of. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE Rgd.