THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO A.S.NO.1567 OF 1998 Dated. 31-12-2010 Between: The Land Acquisition Officer, Doulatabad …Appellant Vs. Amerender Reddy ..Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO A.S.NO.1567 of 1998 JUDGMENT (Per NRLN,J) This appeal is filed against the order of the learned Subordinate Judge, Siddipet in O.P.No.61 of 1989 enhancing the market value of the acquired land from Rs.2,500/- per acre to Rs.9/- per square yard. An extent of Ac.0.33 cents of dry land situated in Sy.No.11/3 of Machanpalli village of Doultabad Mandal was acquired by the Government for providing house sites to the weaker sections of society and notification was issued on 31- 01-1985 and the Land Acquisition Officer conducted an award enquiry and fixed the market value @ Rs.2,500/- per acre. The claimant was not satisfied with the claim and he contended that the land abuts the main road and the village is developed with all amenities and communications and cost of the acquired land is not less than Rs.50,000/- and pleaded for fixation of the market value @ Rs.70,000/- per acre. On behalf of the claimant PW.1 was examined and marked Ex.A-1. The copy of decree in O.P.No.40 of 1987 was marked as Ex.A-1. On behalf of the referring officer, RW.1 was examined and marked Ex.B-1. The points that arise for consideration are:- (1) Whether the market value fixed by the learned Subordinate Judge is legal and sustainable? (2) To what relief? POINTS: Evidently, the claimant has to prove the real market value and in support of his claim PW.1 deposed that he was getting income of Rs.10,000/- to Rs.15,000/- per acre and admittedly no document was placed before the court about the market value. The learned Subordinate Judge found that under Ex.A-2 award in O.P.No.40 of 1987 the lands at Dommata village fetched a market value @ Rs.15/- per square yard. order of the learned Subordinate Judge. Accordingly, the appeal suit is liable to be dismissed. The points are therefore answered. Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J _______________________ N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO,J 31-12-2010 TSNR