IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 1781 of 2010. Decided on: 25th June, 2010. Smt. Jatindra Sharma. ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. Romesh Verma, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by Annexure P-1, order of transfer. According to the petitioner, the transfer is at the instance of the 4th respondent. From the reply filed by the 4th respondent, it is seen that the elder child is mentally challenged to the extent of 100% and only on that ground, the request was made and that was acceded to. 2. Having regard to the peculiar circumstances, we are of the view that the 4th respondent may not be disturbed at this juncture. However, the petitioner has also her own genuine grievances on the obligation to look after the aged and sickly mother-in-law. The petitioner may point out three places of her choice before the 2 second respondent, in which case taking note of the factual background, referred to above and subject to availability of vacancy, the second respondent will pass appropriate orders in the matter in accordance with law and justice and with the required sympathy within two weeks on the production of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 25th June, 2010 (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (tr) Judge.