1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R D.B. Civil Writ Petition (Parole) No.14253 of 2009. Satish Nirankari son of Shri Bhungara Mal VERSUS State of Rajasthan & Others Date of Order :::: 21/11/2009 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.S. Chaudhari Mr. Manu Bhargava, Counsel for the Petitioner Mr. J.R. Bijarnia, Dy. Govt. Counsel for the State *** BY THE COURT : We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the reply submitted by the respondents. This petition has been preferred seeking emergent parole under Rule 10-A of the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958 for the purposes of attending the marriage of the nephew of petitioner. We have perused the reply and Rule 10-A-1 Clause (4) of the Rules of 1958. It is not the case of the petitioner that the parents of the boys, who is getting married are not there 2 and presence of the prisoner-petitioner is essential for the purpose of performance of marriage ceremony. Further, we find that the case of the petitioner does not fall within the provisions of sub-clause (4) of Rules 10-A-1 of the Rules of 1958, where emergent parole may be granted to the prisoner for the marriage of his son or daughter/brother or sister, where the parents are not alive. In the facts and circumstances of the present case, therefore, we are not inclined to accept this petition. This petition is accordingly dismissed. (K.S. Chaudhari), J. (Dalip Singh), J. ashok/