IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11916 of 2011 Kaimul Nesha Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03/ 25.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner being mother-in-law of the deceased is languishing in jail custody since 21.11.2010 in a case registered under sections 304B, 498A and 120B of the IPC. The dead body of the deceased was found in the house of the petitioner and two incised injuries were found on the neck of the deceased in course of post mortem examination. The contention of the leaned counsel for the petitioner is that husband of the deceased had gone abroad in connection with his livelihood and on the alleged date of the occurrence petitioner was also outside her house and deceased was alone in the house and it is further contended by him that when the petitioner came to her house, she found the deceased in the house in pool of blood and thereafter petitioner immediately informed the father of the deceased who came later on and lodged the present case with some ulterior motive. It is also contended by him that in course of investigation not a single witness of the village of the petitioner has come forward to support the prosecution case nor they were examined by the Investigating officer and moreover, investigation of the case has already been completed in respect of the petitioner. Taking into consideration the above stated submissions as - 2 - well as facts and circumstances of the case, particularly, this aspect of the matter that it was the petitioner who had informed the informant in respect of the condition of the deceased and after that informant came at the house of the petitioner, let the petitioner, Kaimul Nesha, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in Manjhagarh P.S. Case no. 226/2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)