IGH COURT OF CHHATTISG AT BILASPUR Division Bench ‘ Comm : Hon’ble shri Jagdish Bhalla, Acting CJ as Hon’ble Shxi Satish K.Agnihot£ri, J. i M.C.C. No. 553 OF 2007 APPLICANTS 1. Hriday Rarh, SIO. Sonwa Ram Gond, R/o. £Ruptola, Patwan‘ Halka No. 18, Tah‘si1 Gurur, District Durg (CG) i L Sh Santosh Kumar, S10 ate n Puneet Ram Dhankar Cultlvator Res1dent of Vlllage Jagtara P C No 13 Tah Balod D1stt Durg Bhagwan Smgh Slo Guman Smgh Gond Culuvator E Han' Singh, iS/o. Nohru Gond (Pétitioner g3 and 4 R/o. Village Tekhadahra', RC. No. 23, Tah. Balod District Durg) Hemlal, SI o. Cultivator Dilip Kumar, S/ o. Bhanu Ram S N c h Gendlal N'ishad‘, hrawan Kumar, S/ o. Ghasiya Ram ishad (Petitioner 5,6 and 7 ‘ ultivators R/o. Village Bhotbli, P.C. No.4, Tah. Balod, Distt. Durg Chhattisgar Versus The State of Chhattisgarh through the Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Raipur (CG) Mini§t1y of Rural Development, through its Secretary, Secretariat, Raipur(CG) Chief Conservator of Forest, Raipur a; Collector, Durg, Distt» Durg (CG) aib Tahsilclar, Gurur, Distt. Dm N g H RESPONDENTS ' APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION O The followmg oral order of the Couxt was passed by Hon’ble Shu Jagdish Bhalla, A¢t1ng C J. g my Pr6s¢nt Shn B P Gupta caunsel for the apphcants Shn G.D.Vaswan1, Government Advocate for thé State. 5 , ,rt ‘ “ORALORDER (Passed on 12th December;2007) i l Learned counsel appearing for the apphcants subm1ts that the counsel for the apphcants could not‘ appear on account of bonaode mlstake, therefore WP. No. 444/2004 wh1ch was dismissed on 5&1 December 2007, be restored. to 1ts $e. Reasoriable and sufficient cause has been shown. WP. No‘ 444/2004-be restored to the original Ee. A copy of this ordei be placed on record ofW P No 444] 2004 _ and the same be hsted for hearmg This application stends disposed of. \ Acu'ng 1 I ’ ” om sw— of Satish K Sd/— Agnihotri I Judge m\r x \.r ‘ F