SEngte Bendi 5^ €- p IN^THE^HON'BLE MI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W,P,_CSL_NO. S" 193 /2011 PETITEONER '^^.A '^.^^^.y"-... l:y'..---"&'^---"" l--v"'/11 ^^••^y-'"^-f}^/l .?-^6*w<'".....-:-'\' RESPONDENTS ^ Ram Bilash Kurrey, S/o. Late Shri Mandal Ram Kurrey, aged about 58 years, Headmaster (Middle) at (T.W.D.), Middle School, Shhindia, Block Baikunthpur, Distt.-Korea (C.6.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, Tribal Welfare bepartment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. -Raipur (C.6.) 2. Assistant Commissioner. Tribal Welfare Department, Distt. Kroea (Baikunthpur) (C.6.) WRITP6TITION UNbER ARTECLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTEON OF IN&IA /' IS ./•^ ^; ^,' XI;HC—78 3T[^I ^I K;-li+ w sn^fwiiw 'S^ "STfqT^f, y^ly'l®,fadiy^ .k/..f...Q.l^e..:£lll^ sn-^i -^aK (li°iij»i<^t) ^aiWHiCTsn^t >.S.2011 Shri Aml Singh Rajput, Shri Chandresh Shriva' With fhe consertt of li matter is heard fmaUv. icounsel for the petitioner. ^tava, Panel Lawyer for fhe ^amed coiiasel for the parties, the The petitioner was apt)ointed as Assistant Teacher on a fixed pay of Rs. 100-150/- uji the year 1977. After successfuUy completing 'the probation p! scale. entitled to regular pay scalej appointment or after coinpleljion of probation period. The issue tnvoived hei 'radesh >.A.No. Smi >/s vf 1S.P. 8a others), wheref situated. teachers are entifled ;riod, he was granted regular pay ^)T<ilf?T^ ^tt^lf Tf ^S^ '^f^I< ^silwisn^i Leamed counsel appe^ring for fhe petitioner submits that the issue uivolved in the cajse is as to whetlier the petitioner is with eft'ect from the date of mitial iiii was considered by fhe Madhya Adinuiistrative Tribunat n, it was that the similarly to regular pay scale with effect from the date of tnitial appointment. The matter was taken up to tfae Hon'ble Supreme Court ia special Leave Petition (Civii) No.6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Horible ^V^y. ^ XI-HC—78 sn^i w h-wch ^TS:H 3H^?T ffi^l^ Praveea. | ^ST ';qTiT[?T?T, ®tiiy'lie,(sicliyy HWW Strqrai •^n, 200 W^I •^W (Tjcrf^^q) Suprem.e Court, upholdin^ effect tfaat the Teachers/Ass pay scale from the date ofir Leamed counsel submits that fhis Court, Amar Sai Ram & Others v. No.4725/2006] by order petitioners to make a repre raising all their grievances i was dtrected to decide the witliin a period of 30 da representation. Accordingly, the representation raising all aforesald judgment and fhe concemed respond^ representation, if any, ui within a period of three m| representation, subject to vj In view of the fores omig ^T<i[<n4li W4^l ^f Tsv\ •if^^K ^3iRl*T3il^[ the decision of the Tribunal to fhe ^istant Teachers are entitled to regiiiar ^itial appointment. aplpeanng for the petitioner fiirther ^phile considering the same issue\in ^tate of Chhattisgarh & Others [W.P.(S) dated 01/09/2006, aUowed the ;^entation wifhin a period of ten days, 4nd in tum; fhe concemed respondent [•epresentation in an objective manner ijys from fhe date of receipt of fbe petjltioner is granted libert}r t.o make his gri-evance, in the liglrt of the cifcular dated 27/12/08, and in tum, tat is directed to decide fhe a^cordance with law, on its own merits, bnths from fhe date of receipt of the ^ri&cation offhe facts. this petition is disposed of. t&? ManindraMohanSteivastava Judge