WW,W,W ~ Wm Hi 200 war-m (W) XI-HC—78 WW . V WW,WW,W i l l bewiecdjmr’ t“ 7 at 200 mm (W) @ 290’}- mmm receiving thc above commwgication, the respondent vide their reply of Annemme P-3 dated 31-h-2oo7, instead of sewing the claim of the applicant, raised count 3r claim and xequested the applicant to settle their daim within a period of 7 days from the date of receipt contemplated that on failure of the .j the requisih'on, they are invoking applicant to comply wit}: arbitration clause as contained in aforesaid agreement dated Qmi July 2004 and cailed upon arbitrator so that the same may be considered by the respondent. From perusal of I of the notice. It was also ' e application and correspondences annexed With the applicatio , no cause of action is available to the applicant for hling this ap and the same is accordingly dismissed. lication. The application is premature Sd/— Dhirendra Mishra Judge the petitioner to suggest the name of