IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 16066 of 2010 Date of Decision: 8.9.2010. Shri Kailash Chander Sachdeva --Petitioner Versus H.U.D.A & others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Ajay Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. Ajay Nara, Advocate present in the Court has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. Plot No. 203, Sector 47, Faridabad was allotted to Sh. Manjit Singh Bali vide memo dated 8.1.2002. This plot was transferred by Sh. Manjit Singh Bali on 14.6.2004 to the petitioner. On transfer of plot, the petitioner applied for possession to the respondents. However, possession could not be handed over to the petitioner due to pending litigation. The H.U.D.A has formulated a policy dated 10.12.2007 (Annexure P-2) for allotment of alternative plot, where the allotted plots are under litigation. The petitioner, accordingly, served a legal notice (Annexure P-3) and also later made a representation (Annexure P-5) for allotment of the alternative plot but no decision has been taken thereon till date by the respondents. CWP. No. 16066 of 2010 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if, respondents are directed to take decision on the legal notice/representation served by the petitioner, referred to above. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to take decision on the legal notice/representation served by the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said respondent. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 8.9.2010. lucky