IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19128 of 2010 SUSHMA DEVI @ MUNNI DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.22925 of 2010 1. RAJESHWAR SINGH 2. SATISH KUMAR SINGH @ SATISH SINGH 3. MRITYUNJAY KUMAR SINGH @ MRITUNJAY SINGH --------------------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 8.7.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Cr.Misc.No. 22925 of 2010: The allegation against the petitioners is that while marriage of Mrityunjay Kumar Singh, petitioner no.3 was settled with complainant’s daughter, Rs. 76,000/- and ornaments were given but for further demand of dowry, the marriage was not solemnized nor the money and ornaments were returned which is denied by them. Further submission of learned counsel is that it was only a negotiation which could not be finalized and to mount pressure only this case is lodged. Cr.Misc.No. 19128 of 2010: Petitioner was allowed anticipatory bail even that due to suffering from Jaundice, she could not surrender in the court below. Again a prayer was made to extend the time is refused. 2 So she also is in need of a fresh order for anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, both the applications for anticipatory bail are allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in Complaint Case No. 181/07, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)