THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.23456 of 2008 ORDER: This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent in proposing to construct a water tank in the part of the premises of house of the petitioner bearing No.23-4-311, admeasuring 75 square yards, situated at Sulthanshahi, Inside Goulipura, Hyderabad. The admitted case of the petitioner is that she had only 75 square yards of land at Sulthanshahi, Goulipura, Hyderabad and adjacent to her land there is 37 square yards of land belonging to the Government, and the same is also in her possession since February, 2000. Therefore, she made an application dated 31.03.2008, to the Government for regularisation of the said land in terms of G.O.Ms.No.166, Revenue (Assignments, POT) Department, dated 16.02.2008, by paying the requisite amount. She also made an application to the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation for penalization of the building constructed in deviation of the sanctioned plan. Her grievance is that while the said applications are pending consideration, the respondent is trying to construct water tank in the North-South corner of her house. Hence, this writ petition. This Court, on 29.10.2008, while issuing Notice before admission, passed an order of status quo with regard to construction of water tank in the premises owned by the petitioner. The respondent filed a counter-affidavit denying the petition averments and stating that the rights of the petitioner with regard to the part of her house are not affected; that he never tried to encroach her property; that the petitioner with an apprehension approached this Court and obtained interim order of status quo with regard to construction of water tank; that due to the said interim order, he could not supply water in the local area, thereby much hardship is caused to the citizens of the locality and that they are making constructions within the area allocated by the Government for construction of water tank and the same would not effect the building of the petitioner. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the respondent. Though the petitioner contends that she made an application for regularization of the said land, which is stated to be in her possession since February, 2000, as on today there are no orders passed regularizing the said land in her favour. Therefore, it cannot be said that the respondent is trying to encroach the land of the petitioner and making construction of water tank. In the circumstances, to give an opportunity to the petitioner, six weeks time is granted to her for getting regularization certificate, in default, the respondent is at liberty to proceed with the construction of water tank. With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. N.V.RAMANA, J Dated: 06.08.2010 va