1SSSS^ia. er"Si'!IYE-.RUriE£sffi _ ^ c^J^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C. No. 5 ^^ /2010 (S.B.t s^^ APPLICANT/ Ravi @ Bittu S/o Madho Rao, aged APPELLANT^V^.--^^ about 16 (Minor) through his natural (^' -^ t^.-1 guardian Smt. Manorama Dahate Mother W/o Madho Rao Dahate, age •,«':''••"','.,,<:^ft^.ys,et\ 40 years, R/o Sanjay Nagar, Supela, ^' ^^ .."^L\"^ Bhilai, Tahsil 85 District Durg (C.G.). .o^"" A.-' NON-APPLICANTS RESPONDENTS VERSUS Kamal Kant S/o Mahipatra Narayan Singh, age 32 years, R/o Indirapara, Supela, Bhilai, Tahsil & District Durg (C.G.) K.K. Pathak S/o Late K.P. Pathak, R/o E.W.S. 47, Vaishali Nagar, Bhilai, Tahsil 7 District Durg (C.G.). Branch Manager, The New India Insurance Co. Ltd. Branch at Power House, Bhilai, Tahsil & District: Durg (C.G.). Commissioner, Bhilai Municipal Corporation, Tahsil SE District: Durg (C.G.). APPLICATION UNDER ORDER 41 RULE 19 C.P.C. 1908 FOR READMISSION OF THE APPEAL M.A. (Cl N0. 224/2008. ^s:sa^. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon' ble ShriR.N. Chandrakar, J M.C.C.No. 539 of 2010 AppJLcant Appellant Non-ap&licante, Respondents Ravi @ Bittu s/o. Madho Rao, aged about 16 (Minor) through his natural guardian Smt. Manorama DAhate Mother W/o. Madho Rao Dahate, age 40 years, r/o. Sanjay Nagar, Supela, Bhilai, Tahsil & District Durg (CG). Vs. 1) Kamal Kant s/o. Mahipatra Narayan Singh, age 32 years, r/o. Indirapara, Supela, Bhilai, Tahsil & District Durg 2) K.K. Pathak, s/o. Late K.P. Pathak, r.o. E.W.S. 47,Vaishali Nagar, Bhilai, Tahsil & District Durg (CG). 3) Branch Manager, the New India Insurarice Co. Ltd., Branch at Power House, Bhilai, Tahsil & District Durg. 4) The Principal, Government High School Jamraga, Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh (CG). (Application for restoration of Misc.Appeal (C) No. 224 of 2008) Present: Shri Amaykant Tiwari, counsel for the applicant. v Oral Order ' (Passedonthis20thdayofNovember,2010) Learned counsel for the applicant is heard on the restoration petition. The applicant has filed this application for restoration of Misc. Appeal (C) No. 224 of 2008 which was dismissed by this court vide order dated 26-8-2010 for want of prosecution. On due consideration of the reasons assigned in the application which is also supported by affidavit of the learned counsel for the ^"^^.^& "-fSsS-f K applicant, 1 am satisfied that tHe applieant has been atale to show sufficient cause for non-appearance 6f the eounsel for the appellanton 26-8-2010 Accordingly, M.C.C.No.539/2010 isallowed and Misc. Appeal (C) No. 224 of 2008 is directed to be restored to its briginal number fv ^T Sdf- i R.N. Chandrakar [ Judge