1 Cri.A.2160.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2160 OF 2011 Mahendra Gurulingam Bhandari R/o Pensionpura, Hingoli, Ta. And Dist.Hingoli. ..APPLICANT. VERSUS The State of Maharashtra, ...RESPONDENT. ... Shri. Shashikant S.Londhe,Advocate for Applicant. Shri.N.H.Borade, A.P.P. for Respondent. ... CORAM: T.V.NALAWADE, J. DATE : 23RD JUNE, 2011. PER COURT : 1. This application is filed for anticipatory bail, in Crime No.75 of 2011, registered with City Police Station Hingoli, District Hingoli, for the offence punishable under sections 307, 188 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. Papers of investigation are made available by APP. Today Advocate 2 Cri.A.2160.11 for the applicant also produced copy of previous Crime and copy of the plaint of suit filed by the original complainant. Both sides are heard. 3. Complainant is widow of deceased brother of present applicant. There is some dispute between the family of complainant and applicant in respect of residential place. Suit is also filed by the complainant due to dispute. It is her case that applicant and others are trying to deprive her of her rights and they want that she should vacate the house. She has contended that Civil Court has granted relief of injunction but in spite of that applicant and his family members are harassing her. It is her case that on 26.04.2011 applicant and sister of the applicant picked up quarrel with her and then they entered the house. She has contended that present applicant poured kerosene on her person and he rushed to his own house to bring match box. She has contended that she ran away to save her and then report came to be lodged. 4. Advocate for the applicant submitted that the case narrated in the FIR is improbable in nature, and if applicant had intention to finish the complainant, he would have taken the match box with him. This submission cannot be accepted at this stage. On 26.01.2011 also report was given by the complainant for the offence punishable under section 294 3 Cri.A.2160.11 of the IPC. Copy of the complaint filed by the complainant was shown to the Court, and it is consistent with allegations made. A Copy of spot panchnama produced by prosecutor shows that in the room of the complainant there was kerosene all over. Clothes of the complainant were takeover as there was kerosene poured on it. In view of the circumstances, this Court holds that there is sufficient material on record to make out prima facie case, so anticipatory bail cannot be granted to the applicant. So, application stands rejected. No further interim relief. Sd/- [ T.V.NALAWADE, J.] MTK