.UP 10 2; Draft, newprinter; -n -PA4 -y -dFX-NORMAL -Fx -e; dumbp L.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T....R .HM3 .FM3 .HE1 (-#-) ...................L.....T.......T.......T.......T....T..........T...J IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY@@ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION@@ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1471 OF 1999@@ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Radheshyam Gupta ...Petitioner V/s. The Union of India & ors. ...Respondents ..... Mr. O.P. Singh, Adv. for the petitioner Mr. J.C. Satpute, Adv. for respondent Nos. 1 & 3. Ms. P.H. Kantharia, A.P.P. for R. Nos. 2, 4 & 5. ..... CORAM: H.L. GOKHALE AND @@ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ.@@ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA DATE : 24TH AUGUST, 2004@@ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA P.C..@@ AAAA .SP2 1. Heard Mr. Singh for the petitioner, Ms. Kantharia appears for respondent Nos. 2,4 and 5 and Mr. Satpute is present for respondent Nos. 1 and 3. 2. Though this petition is essentially against the respondent No.1 Gas Authority of India Ltd., Mr. Singh states that he is not pressing the petition. He submits that he has cause of action against the State Government and its Officers. We do not find it in the present petition in any case. He seeks permission to withdraw the present petition and states that he may file a fresh petition later on against the State Government and its Officers. Liberty granted as prayed for provided the cause of action is available to the petitioner. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such.