1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1380 OF 1998 Bhaurao s/o Ramji Biradar, age: 60 years, Occ: agriculture, R/o Somthana, Taluka Nilanga, District Latur. Petitioner Versus 1 The State of Maharashtra 2 The Director of Sugar, Maharashtra State, Pune. 3 The Joint Director of Sugar, Nanded Region, Nanded. 4 Jai Jawan Jai Kisan Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited, Lal Bahadur Shastri Nagar, Nalegaon, Taluka Chakur, District Latur, through its Managing Director. Respondents Mr.A.V.Patil, advocate holding for Mr.V.D.Gunale, advocate for the petitioner. Mrs.R.K.Ladda, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 to 3. Mr.V.G.Sakolkar, advocate for Respondent No.4. CORAM: B.R.GAVAI AND S.V.GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE : 8 th July, 2010. ORAL JUDGMENT (Per S.V.Gangapurwala, J.): 2 1 By the present petition, the petitioner claims a direction against Respondent No.4 for not harvesting his sugarcane in land G.No.145. 2 The petitioner is claiming compensation on account of non- feasance on the part of Respondent No.4. The petitioner could have filed proceedings before the Co-operative Court or the Civil Court in view of the fact that computation of compensation would require evidence, as the same being a disputed question of fact. This Court, in its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, would not embark upon such enquiry. 3 In this view of the matter, Writ Petition stands dismissed. Rule discharged, however, with no order as to costs. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA) (B.R.GAVAI) JUDGE JUDGE ******* adb/wp138098