1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 4642/2009. ( Rambhau Tanbaji Itankar -: versus :- State of Maharashtra and others ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JANUARY 13, 2010. Heard Shri S.M. Puranik, learned counsel for petitioner, Shri Kothari, learned A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 and 2 and Shri S.P. Bhandarkar, learned counsel for intervenor. This Court has already recorded reasons while granting interim relief on 30.10.2009 and thereafter on 15.12.2009 and 16.12.2009. It is apparent that, there were no complaints against the eating house licence of the petitioner and hence action taken against the said eating house licence was only to reach his FL-III licence. In this view of the matter, it is apparent that the order of suspension of eating house licence dated 27.10.2009 is unsustainable, the same is accordingly quashed and set aside. However, it is made clear that this does not preclude the respondents from taking action in accordance with law in the matter. 2 At this stage, Shri Bhandarkar, learned counsel points out that vide order dated 16.12.2009, this Court has called upon the respondent nos.1 and 2 to file separate affidavits explaining the situation and progress in the matter by today. Learned A.G.P. states that he can file such affidavits within one week. In view of today’s order, it is apparent that the Authorities have not taken any steps in the matter till date. Filing of affidavits by itself may not be sufficient in the matter. In view of the liberty given to the Authorities no orders in this respect are necessary. Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly, with no order as to costs. JUDGE Rgd.