1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7228 OF 2009 Dnyan Vidnyan Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Mortalwadi (Hali), Tq-Udgir, Dist-Latur. ...PETITIONER. VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri.P.G. Rodge Advocate for Petitioner. Smt.A.V. Gondhalekar, A.G.P. for the Respondent No.1. Shri.A.D. Shinde Advocate h/f. Shri. V.D. Hon Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. ... WITH WRIT PETITION NO.7229 OF 2009 Shri Sant Kaikadi Maharaj Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Shahapur, Tq-Degloor, Dist-Nanded. ...PETITIONER. VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others. ...RESPONDENTS. 2 ... Shri.P.G. Rodge Advocate for Petitioner. Shri.S.K. Tambe, A.G.P. for the Respondent No.1. Shri.A.D. Shinde Advocate h/f. Shri. V.D. Hon Advocate for Respondent No. 2. Shri.V.S. Panpatte Advocate for Resp. No.3. ... WITH WRIT PETITION NO.7231 OF 2009 Bhartiya Gramin Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Gavan, Tq-Jalkot, Dist-Latur. ...PETITIONER. VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri.P.G. Rodge Advocate for Petitioner. Shri.V.D. Rakh, A.G.P. for the Respondent No.1. Shri.A.D. Shinde Advocate h/f. Shri. V.D. Hon Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. ... WITH WRIT PETITION NO.7232 OF 2009 Dnyan Vidnyan Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Mortalwadi (Hali), Tq-Udgir, Dist-Latur. ...PETITIONER. 3 VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri.P.G. Rodge Advocate for Petitioner. Shri.R.P. Phatke, A.G.P. for the Respondent No.1. Shri.A.D. Shinde Advocate h/f. Shri. V.D. Hon Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. ... WITH WRIT PETITION NO.7233 OF 2009 Dnyan Vidnyan Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Mortalwadi (Hali), Tq-Udgir, Dist-Latur. ...PETITIONER. VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri.P.G. Rodge Advocate for Petitioner. Smt.R.K. Laddha, A.G.P. for the Respondent No.1. Shri.A.D. Shinde Advocate h/f. Shri. V.D. Hon Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. ... WITH 4 WRIT PETITION NO.7471 OF 2009 Meena Bahuudeshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha, Udgir, Tq-Udgir, Dist-Latur. ...PETITIONER. VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri.P.G. Rodge Advocate for Petitioner. Shri.V.H. Dighe, A.G.P. for the Respondent No.1. Shri.A.D. Shinde Advocate h/f. Shri. V.D. Hon Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND K.U. CHANDWAL, JJ. DATE : 16TH DECEMBER, 2009. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The learned A.G.P. makes a statement that within four weeks from today the decision of the State Government in respect of the Petitioners' proposals would be communicated to the 5 Petitioners. 3. We accept the statement made by the learned A.G.P. We dispose of all these Petitions on the statement made by the learned A.G.P. The Writ Petitions are accordingly disposed of. [K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.] asb/DEC09/wp7228.09