IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 10TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 19TH BHADRA 1929 WP(C).No. 15435 of 2007(U) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: ------------------- 1. SANGEETHA C.P., W/O.JOBY, TYPIST, KECHERI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, KECHERI, THRISSUR. 2. SREEJA C.P., W/O.MADHAVAN, APPRAISER, KECHERI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, KECHERI, THRISSUR. 3. RAJI V.M., W/O.V.A.SUDHAKARAN, PEON, KECHERI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, KECHERI, THRISSUR. 4. REMA P.A., W/O.K.K.JAYAPRAKASH, PEON, KECHERI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, KECHERI, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.V.V.SURENDRAN SRI.P.A.HARISH RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), PALAKKAD. 2. THE KECHERI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KECHERI, THRISSUR. ADDL.R3 AND R4 IMPLEADED. 3. T.S. PRABHITHA, AMBALIL HOUSE, KADANCHERI, KALADY, MALAPPURAM. 4. SHEEBA U.K., PARANNOOR HOUSE, PARANNOOR P.O., CHOONDAL, TRICHUR. ADDL. R3 AND R4 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN I.A. 7419/2007 DATED 4.9.2007. R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. ANU SIVARAMAN. R2 BY ADV. SRI.TOJAN J. VATHIKULAM R3 & R4 BY ADV.SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP.(C) No. 15435 of 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 10th day of September, 2007 JUDGMENT Petitioners have approached this court challenging Exts.P6 to P11. Exts.P10 and P11 are orders issued by the Deputy Registrar (Viglance), pursuant to which Exts.P6 to P9 are issued by the Society. It is common case that Exts.P10 and P11 were issued without hearing the petitioners. It is clear that it is an order by which the petitioners are prejudiced and it could have been done only after hearing the petitioners. Exts.P6 to P9 are consequential orders issued by the Society. In such circumstances, Exts.P6 to P11 cannot be sustained. Accordingly Exts.P6 to P11 are quashed leaving it free to the first respondent to consider the matter with opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, respondent No.2 and additional respondents 3 and 4. I leave open all the contentions apart from the contention that Exts.P10 and P11 were issued without notice. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb