1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR C.A.NO. 1046/2009 IN M.C.A.ST.NO. 13355/2009 IN S.A.NO. 652/2004. ( Gopal Sakharam Jambhulkar and another -: versus :- Gayabai Sakharam Jambulkar and others. ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : NOVEMBER 17, 2009. Heard learned counsel for applicant. Prayer is to condone delay of 528 days [1 year and 163 days] in filing review application. Learned counsel for applicant states that, this court has asked applicants to file review. Earlier for the same purpose, an application for speaking to minutes was filed and it was withdrawn. There is no question of this court asking any body to file review application. The Second Appeal filed challenging the judgment and decree in Regular Civil Appeal by the original plaintiffs came to be dismissed. Present review applicants were respondents in it and original defendants in suit. In Appeal there was no relief sought for by them for dismissal of the suit. In Second appeal filed by the plaintiffs in above circumstances, there was no question of dismissing the suit as filed by the plaintiffs. The statement made in paragraph no.4 2 of the review application for that purpose is incorrect. There is no merit in the review application, the same is therefore dismissed. As I do not find any merit in the review application itself, there is no question of issuing notice in this Civil Application for condonation of delay, hence Civil Application for condonation of delay is also dismissed. No costs. JUDGE Rgd.