CRM-M No. 3211 of 2011 **** Bijender vs. State of Haryana Present: Mr. Shailender Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. **** This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in a case bearing FIR No. 553 dated 06.10.2010, under Sections 454/380 IPC registered at Police Station Central Faridabad. Learned counsel has argued that that the petitioner is sought to be implicated only on the statement of the co-accused which is considered to be very weak evidence. The present is a case where the co-accused has been arrested for breaking into the house of the complainant and stealing gold jewellery and cash. As per the statement of the co-accused he has sold the jewellery to the petitioner. Thus, it was not a case where incrimination was by a co-accused in the normal sense of the word. Learned counsel has stated that the petitioner has been named because the co-accused suspected that he was a police informer, however, there is no evidence to support this allegation. In the circumstances I find no reason to differ with the findings of the learned Additional Sessions Judge. This petition is dismissed. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE February 02, 2011 sunita