IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2009 of 2011 1. RAMASHISH RAI SON OF LATE GANNU RAI. 2. RAMANAND RAI SON OF SRI RAMASHISH RAI. 3. BHOLA RAI SON OF SRI RAMASHISH RAI. 4. ARVIND RAI SON OF SRI RAMASHISH RAI. 5. CHANSHILA DEVI D/O SRU RANASGUSG RAI. 6. RAMRATI DEVI W/O SRI RAMASHISH RAI. ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BEDAUL ASALI, P.S. AURAI, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR. ------PETITIOENRS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ---------OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 2 19.02.2011 Perused the records. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 323, 379 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the petitioner no.1 took money from the complainant for the marriage of his son. The accused persons also took other articles. When the complainant went to the house of the petitioners he was being assaulted and Rs. 25,000/- and a watch was snatched. The occurrence alleged to have taken place on 22.01.2010 whereas the complaint was lodged on 23.01.2010, but there is nothing on record to suggest that why the police case was not filed though the complaint was filed under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 2 379, 406, 420, 384 and 504 of the ST & SC Act but the cognizance has been taken under Section 323, 379, 406 of the I.P.C. Record suggests that there is no recovery from the petitioners nor there is any documentary proof with regard to the lending money and other articles by the complainant to the petitioners. Considering the nature of accusation, let the above named petitioners be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case No. C-165 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Muzaffarpur Subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)