WP(C) 3573/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA . Heard Mr.D.K.Deka,learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. H.K . Sarma, learned Standing Counsel, A.S.E.B. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner, who has allegedly carri ed out some contractual works under the respondents, has prayed for a direction to the respondents to pay the bill amount pertaining to the said works. From the materials on record, it appears that the petitioner had earlie r approached this Court by filing WP(C) No.6131/2004 and the same was disposed o f along with a batch of writ petitions by order dated 7.2.2007. It also appears that the petitioner had filed a money suit being Money Suit No.1/1994. It is on this count, Mr. Sarma, learned Standing Counsel, ASEB submits that such writ pe tition is barred by res judicata. Mr. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that whatever may b e the outcome of consideration of the case of the petitioner, he is entitled to know the result thereof. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of providing that t he respondents may communicate their decision in respect of the aforesaid claim of the petitioner taking into account the principles laid down in Taamsher Ali & Ors v. State of Assam & Ors, 2008 (4) GLT 1 (FB). Whatever may be outcome of consideration of the case of the petitioner, same sha ll be communicated to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, preferably w ithin 3 (three) months from the date of furnishing a certified copy of this orde r. Writ petition is disposed of.