@ , \c"' ^" IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION N0.t tu^2006 PETITIONER .-A^- ^%^x *• ^w^ I*** .>"* ..x^'.*''"" ^ j.vy^y •^ c -y ^" RESPONDENTS ^ Unaa Shankar Chaturvedi, s/o R.S. Chaturvedi, aged about 45 years, posted as Electrical Fitter, Deepika Expansion, S.E.C.L., Gevra District Korba R/o. A/149, Basant Vihar, BUaspur, District BUaspur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. South East Coal Limited, Through- Chief Managing Director, S.E.C.L. Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. The Coal Minmg Director, S.E.C.L., BUaspur (C.G.) 3. The Deputy General Manager, Deepika Expansion, S.E.C.L. Gevra Area, District Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES /' 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT/WRITS. ORDER/ORDERS. OR/AND DIRECTION / DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI. OR OF ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE NATURE. XI-HC-78 ^1*1CTI Sh*ll«h 3^ "qi<IICT<<, ®Tn«'16,Rldl+fy ;-y.f..^-.-.l.T.S2:l^. ^ 200 3ll^l iia<n ('i^i^'sl^tT) sn^rqir^iN; cTSTT STI^T ^TTt^ STttTwnfN'sii^r <ni<<tcl<fl"< H|t<CTTffte^<.Rlt<iK ^•3iri^IT3TI^?T 5.7.2006 Chakravs|rthy Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, petitioner. Shri Aaand Mohaa Tin|ari, along wifh Shri B. SECL. Heard. The grievaace of the peti^ioni after his transfer to Gevera hk Gevra, fherefore, he has not va( account of non-vacation of been iaitiated against him. When the inatter is takf petitioner subinitted that the| quarter withia a period of two| eaquiry initiated on accotuit of dropped. Shri Chafcravarfhy, Per^onn that if the petitioner vaeates petitioner's case ia the sym.patheticaUy and accordia.s further subinitted that on case of fhe petitioner for atlot4ient considei^d on priority basis. As far as the grievaiic) payment ofT.A. & D.A. allowa(ices Adv|3cate for the petitioner along with 1, Advocate for the icspondents ly, Personziel Maaager (Admn.), ;ti^ioner raised in this petition is that h|e has not been aUotted quarter at ;ated the quarter at Bflaspur aud on q^iarter a departaiental enquiry has :n up for hearing, counsel for fb.e petitioner is ready to vacate fhe weeks, therefore, fhe departanental ]the said conduct of fhe petitionerbe ^oiuiel Manager (Adian,) submitted |the quarter withia two weeks, the euquiiy shall be considered ^y the order shaU. be passed. He of the quarter at Bilaspur the of quarter at Gevra wfll also be departjmental vacfction of the petitioner regarding non- is concemed, it is evident froin XI-HC-78 ^st 'fww^, vnS\ww, Kiv\wy. *(1fTTI aiMItb ^ 200 311^!»1l|sl* (>i?l3q'<eT) sn^rqn'R^ich craT3TI^Tst)H -Oll- ?RnWtl1?cT3TI^T (Ar|ni the oider dated 11.9.2000 Manager (Manpower),SECL, inade on fhe request of the pe) for any aUowaace. Counsel for fhe petitionej inade at fhe request offhe As far as fhis issue is therefore, the petitioner laay for fhat relief, if so advised. In view of the above petition is disposed ofwith a the quarter witTiin a period syiiipafhetic view of the agamst the petitioner be dispos] petitioner at Gevra be also cons] Certi&ed copy as per rule^ \r|nexure P-5) passed by the Ocneral Bjlaspur that the said transfer was [itioner, fherefore, he is not eutiUed petiqoner coliceraed, inatter q>l<<(fl<fl'< *111ClTffteIA'<Rl«;K ^srf^Tsn^r ~ subinits fhat titie transfer was not aad disputes the fact. 1, disputed facts are involved, a civfl suit befoie fhe Civil Court file ajgreeinent between fhe parties, ffae d(rection that if the petitiouer vacates [of two weeks' froin today, taking itfer, departmental enquiiy initiated :d of aud allotment of quarter to the Ideicd. — - Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge y?i^