IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13199 of 2011 Manjhi Prakhad Fisheries Co-Operative Society Limited through Its Secretary Smt. Bindu Devi W/O Rameshwar Turha R/O Vill. Phulwaria Tazpur, P.S. Majhi, Distt. Saran at Chapra …Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar, Through the Secretary, Animal Husbandry and Fish Resources Department, Bihar, Patna 2. Director, Animal Husbandry and Fish Resources Department, Bihar, Patna 3. District Fisheries Officer - Cum - Chief Executive Officer Saran at Chapra 4. District Co-Operative Officer Saran at Chapra 5. Cooperative Extension Officer, Manjhi 5. Mithilesh Prsad 6. Sushil Kumar Suman …Respondents ---------------------------------- 04. 23.12.2011 Petitioner is a Cooperative Society represented through Rameshwsar Turha. Petitioner seeks quashment of the letter issued under memo no. 1007 dated 01.07.2011 passed by the Secretary of the Government in the Department of Animal Husbandry and Fish Resources (Annexure-16). There is further prayer that the authorities be directed to take steps for making settlement with the reorganized society through the duly elected Ad hoc Committee. Learned counsel for the respondents, on the other hand, contended that settlement of the Sairat in question was made with respondent nos. 5 and 6 which was assailed in CWJC No. 7829 of 2009 (Annexure C to I. A. No.5791 of 2011. This Court by order dated 13.07. 2009 did not interfere with the matter. Aggrieved thereby, the writ petitioner of the aforesaid case filed writ appeal being LPA No. 1066 of 2 2009(Smt. Shanti Devi ‘Adhyaksha’ Vindhyawasini Matsyajivi Swalambi Sahkari Samiti Ltd. vs. State of Bihar & Ors.) in which respondent nos. 5 and 6 herein were impleaded as respondent nos.4 and 5. On a consideration of materials brought on record, the writ appeal court by judgment and order dated 15.02.2010(Annexure-A to I. A. No.5791 of 2011) dismissed the appeal. On the strength of aforesaid, it is contended that the petitioner now cannot challenge the settlement of Jalkar in question in favour of the intervenor- respondents, period whereof is/are going to lapse with effect from 30.06.2012. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that a review application has been filed by the appellants of LPA No.1066 of 2009 against the order dated 15.02.2010. It is agreed at Bar that present application be disposed of with the observation that Jalkar in question made in favour of respondent nos.5 & 6 shall be subject to the result of the review application which has been filed on behalf of the present writ petitioner against the order dated 15.02.2010 (Annexure-A to I. A. No. 5791 of 2011). I order accordingly. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )