IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.47538 of 2008 1.RAM EKBAL SAH SON OF RAMDHARI SAH 2.CHOTELAL SAH SON OF LATE TAGH SAH BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE LAGUNIAN,P.S.PAHARPUR, DISTRICT EAST CHAMPARAN AT MOTIHARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 17.3.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. and learned counsel appearing for the complainant/informant. The petitioners seek bail in a case which has been registered for offences under Sections 302,364 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Initially a complaint was filed which was referred to police and thereafter present first information report has been registered. Allegation is that the informant’s husband was taken away by the petitioners but he did not return. She suspected that he might have been murdered. Submission is that in course of investigation, a number of witnesses who were co- labourers have been examined in paragraph 10 to 13 and they have stated that it was an accidental death. There is no allegation that any force was used for taking away the informant’s husband. The prayer for bail of the petitioners has been opposed by the learned counsel appearing for the informant/complainant who has submitted that there is other version of the occurrence which corroborates the statements of some of the witnesses and they have stated that the petitioners appear to be responsible for the occurrence. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners be released 2 on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari in Paharpur P.S.Case No. 135 of 2007. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)