S.B. C. Writ Petition No.2970/2010. (Thep Singh & Anr. Vs. RSRTC & ors.) Date of Order: 31/03/2010. HON'BLE MR. MOHAMMAD RAFIQ,J. Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya, for the petitioners. The grievance of the petitioners is that even though they are having the qualification of IIT and metriculation both and the respondents have granted the benefit by order dated 6.5.06 granting appointments to such of the technical staff, who hold these two qualifications on the post of Artisan Gr.I, yet the petitioners are being still continued on the post of Artisan Gr.III on which only non-IIT candidates are appointed. The learned counsel cited the order dated 16.9.78 (Annex.6) and argued that a number of persons who along with the petitioners were selected as trainee under the Apprenticeship's Act were appointed by the aforesaid order dated 6.5.2006 as Artisan Gr.I on consideration of the fact that they possessed the qualification of matriculation and IIT, but the petitioner was deprived of such benefit. If that be so, the petitioner should first make a representation to the Executive Director (Mechanical), RSRTC who is the author of the order dated 6.5.06. The said authority shall examine the correctness of the petitioner's version with reference to the assertion made in the representation and verify whether the petitioners are matriculate and IIT holders, and if they are otherwise similar to the candidates who have been granted the benefit of appointment on the post of Artisan Gr.I pursuant to the settlement arrived at between the Management and the Union, consider granting such benefit to the petitioners as well. The decision of the representation be made within a period of three months from the date of its submission. The petition is accordingly disposed of. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ),J. Gandhi/-P.A. Item no. 58