é HIGH COURT OF CHHA’I‘TISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITloN (S) No. 1323 ofzoos ‘ Mahendra Kumar Gupta‘, aged about 36 years, sGn of Shri J.P.Gupta, working as ~ Assistant Grade III, Oflice of As$istant Engineer (E/M), Sub Division Public Health and Engineeriag’ ' Department, Kawardhe, Distt. Kabeerdham (CG) i VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Chief Secretmy, Dan Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) PETITIONER 2. State of Madhya Pradesh? through the Chief o Secretary, Govemment of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal. 3. The Engineer in Chief, Department of Public Health and Engineering, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Department of Public Health and Engineer, Bhopa1(MP) 5. Union of India, through the Ministly of Personnel, Pubiie Grievance and Pension, Depaxtment of Personnel and Training, Govemment of India, Khan Market, New Delhi. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDEA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Shri R.K.Kesharwani, Advocate for the petitioner. Present: Shri A.S.Kaehhwaha, Deputy Advocate General for the State/ respondent No. 1 and3. v Shri Ajay Bank, Advocate on behalf of Shri S.K.Beriwal, Standing Counsel for the Union of India. ORAL ORDER (Passed onWW... 17 day of March, 2008) IA. No. 01. This is an application for amendment in the cause title. The application is ordered as prayed for. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner undertakes to make necessary corrections during the course q I 1#3; #71 1 Learned counsel aapearmg for the petmoner subnms that he does not want to press tfns petmon on mam except that thef petitioner be permitted to make a representation to the Comm1ttee m I1ght of the judgment and order dated 1" April, 2007 passed by this Court in B R Godbole Vs Municipal Comoration Durv and others {2007(2) CGLJ 4173 to which 1eamed counsel appearing for the respondent/State have no objection . Accordingly, the petition is disposed of in the same terms i.e. the Committee so constituted is directed to consider the representation made by the petitioner, ifhis representations is not considered earlier. In the event, if it is not considered earlier, the nesh representation may be considered, as early as possibie Within a period of four months from the date of receipt 0t representation The reoresentations may be conSidered keeping in mind the fact of residence and posting of the employee in one State and posting of the spouse in other State. This exercise on the part ofthe Government of India may be completed Within a period of tour months from the date of receipt of a copy ot this order z / i> maxi, lie sw— ’ Satish K Agnihntri Judge ‘;:LvL