IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20929 of 2011 Sarita Kumari @ Annu, W/O Deepak Kuamr Lal, R/O Mohalla Aamgola Khajurbanni, P.S.- Kazi Mohammadpur, Distt- Muzaffarpur. … Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar through Vigilance … Opp. Party. ----------- 3 18.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Vigilance. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in connection with Special Case No. 17 of 2008 (arising out of Vigilance P.S. Case No. 2 of 2008) for the offences punishable under Sections 120B and 109 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 13(2) read with Section 13(i)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, pending in the Court of Special Court-II, Vigilance, Patna, in this case instituted against the other named co-accused persons were none else then in laws of the petitioner including principal accused i.e. father in law of the petitioner. Her name emerged during investigation when after providing key of bank locker standing in the joint name of the petitioner and the husband. Huge quantity of cash and other articles were recovered. Submission is that petitioner is one of the joint holders of the locker, with her husband who alone used to operate the same along with his father as is evident from 2 statement of Bank Manager recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. Further submission is that father in law of the petitioner has already surrendered and is in custody. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of her arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Court- II, Vigilance, Patna, in connection with Spl. Case No. 17 of 2008 (arising out of Vigilance P.S. Case No. 2 of 2008), subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for three years of till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Bhardwaj (Akhilesh Chandra, J)