u MESGELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER SECTIQN 173 OF TEE MO?OR VEHICLE8 ACT, 1588 Present : appeknt. The foiiowing order of the Court was passed by Raiéev Gupta, c.J. : Appeilant Rajesh Kumar @ Kaiu Yadav has filed this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicies Act against the award dated 25*“ August, 2003 passed by the Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunai, Mungeli, District Biiaspur, in Claim Case No. 07/2003, whereby the appeiiant’s ciaim petition fiied d under Section 166 ofthe Motor Vehicles Act was dismisse. F/J, J, H§GH COURT OF CHHATTESGARH AT BHLASPUR D!\I!SION BENCH Shri Gautam Kheirapai. iearned counsei for the 0 R D E R ( 17‘“ November, 2ne8 ) . Coram HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON’BLE SHR! SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. MA. No. 1126 of 2(103 APPELLANT Rajesh Kumar @ Kaiu Yadav, $fo. CLAEMANT Dhawaja Ram Yadav, Aged abcut 26 years, R/o‘ Dauparag Mungeli, Tahsil and District Bi§aspur (0.6.) ~. ‘ ilersus RESPONDENTS 1. Manish Kumar, Sic. V.K‘ GWNER ShrWastava, Aged about 32 years, : R/o. Kududand Bnaspur, Tahsi! and District Biiaspur (C.G.) ENSURER 2. The Orientai insurance Company Through General Manager Branch Office Dayaiband Biiaspur. Tahsii and District Biiaspui (C.G.) 3) Permissmn granted. 4) With the above withdrawn. V . 5} dismissed as withdrawn. padma jr Sd/- ‘ {Chief Justice Consequentiy, M.[C}.P. No. 498/2004 also stands sly- SUNIL KUMAR SINHA Judge 7’ W 2) Shri Gautam Khetrapa£ learned counsel for the appeléant seeks permsssmn to Withdraw the aopeai With ”bertv of avallmg the other remedies whmh may be availabie to the apnenant for getting compensation under the reievant prowsnons of !aw liberty, the appeai is dismissed as