IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 16TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 25TH KARTHIKA 1929 WP(C).No. 33890 of 2007(H) --------------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- T.K. SASI, MEMBER, WARD NO.II, EAST ELERI GRAMA PANCHAYAT, CHITTARIKKAL P.O., KASARGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.C.JAMES SRI.GEORGE MECHERIL RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, POWER DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SECRETARY, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDHYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTAM PALACE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, K.S.E.B., KASARAGOD. 4. THE EXECUTIVE CHIEF ENGINEER, K.S.E.B. SECTION OFFICE, BHEEMANADI, KASARGODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI. P.P. THAJUDEEN, SC FOR KSEB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 33890 OF 2007 H ===================== Dated this the 16th day of November, 2007 J U D G M E N T Essentially the complaint raised in this writ petition is against the shifting of a KSEB Sub Engineer's Office, which has now been upgraded to a Section Office. I see no legal right for the petitioner to entertain this writ petition. It is for the respondents to decide, which is the best location suitable for an office. It is neither for this court nor it is for the petitioner to meddle with such a policy decision to be taken by the respondents. Writ petition fails and is dismissed. However, if Ext.P5 has been received and is pending, it is upto the authority concerned to deal with the same and I do not wish to express anything on this. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Rp