IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Sl NO.^^QO OF 2009 B©!K^ PETITIONER : 'Dr. K. Tripathi, S/o Late Shri Basant Tripathi, aged about 63 years, Retired Professor, CMD College, Bilaspur, R/o B-1/7 Kranti Nagar, Bilaspur (CG). Versus RESPONDENTS : ^ Xf/ ^ .^' ^^ ^\.-':^'' ...'' ^••:~SP>^ ffN \^^^WV .^y^ $^^^ ^y%. ^'\. ~^ ^ '&'l ,^ 'm ^ 6'*s"fc.l .^''^^. ^ '^^g^^^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Thro. The Secretary, Department of Higher Education, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). 2. The Commissioner, Deptt. of Higher Education, Govt. Science College Premises, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) .^••t-" 3. Director, Department of Higher Education, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG) 4. 'The Principal, C.M.D. College, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 5. Chairman, Managing Committee, C.M.D. College, Bilaspur (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA •^ 311^1'^rl^fte ^ff ^H^TiFRW 'S^ ^Nld'4,®ift-y<i<o,f®i<ni-M*i< ^-^......^.'..£..a^....3..S^?./...-^ NINdl (b<41cb ——•""••""•—•—"••^"••^ 200 3T^?n^F (licl(y«i^i) '^TOT'^f^T 3TI^l SB : J'USTECE P| 2.4.07.2009 Shri B.D.Guru, counsei fo| Shri Yashwant Singh Thal] P.L, fortheState. Contention of the coun] petitioner, who was working as | has retired after. sen/ing about 3| petitioner is entitled for leave en| has nofc been given-.to him despit| Accordin^ to counsel for covered with the judgment of t| ys» Bigher . Ss Qthers (10) SCC 346} \ judgment, .the petitioner may b^ petition with'liberty to file'repr| fiirther submitted that direction deciding the representation of th| Learned counseL.for thc representation is being made'by the same is being decided in acc| that the -representation.so made law. • . • . . AccQrdingly, the. petition liberty as aforesaid. -In' the eventi representation within a'Deriod o| of the-copy of this ordcr, the s<^ . respondent No.2 withm a fu.rther] <^Hi<n<fll 'RTR^ff ^f 'fetst <r'l^l< '^'^TRmsn^T %ITINKERDIWAKER ' the petitioner. :ur, Dy. A.G. with Ms- SunitaJa.in, ^el for the petitioner is that the ^rofessor in 'C.M.D. College, Bilaspur 9 years. He submits that though the ^ashment of 240. days but the sa.me ; his several representations. the petitioner his case is squarely ae''Hon:ble Apex Court in qf 'Secandary Schaoly L-achhmangarh ^nd therefore, in the light of the said permitted to withdraw the present bsentation to respondent No.2. It is Tiay be issued to respondent No.2 ibr ? petitioner expeditiously. Sta.te has no obiection if any such <he petitioner to respondent No,2 and ^rda-nce with law. He fiirther submits would be decided in accordance with is dismissed'as withdrawn with the h-ality of the. petitioner's making such three weeks from the dat^e of'rcceipt pie'is expected fco be decided^b^ the. penod oiki:wo-months. \ . • • Sd/- pritinkerDiwaker Judge