Petitjoners Ao&licarits Respondents Non-aoDlicants HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^ Writ Petition (2271 N0.8903 of 2009 1. Ganesh Kumar Jagaframka S/o Shri Banwariiai, aged about 65 years 2. Akhilesh Kumar S/@ Shri ©aneshKumar Jagatramka, aged about 38 years Both R/o village-Taraimai. Up-Tahsil- Tamnar, DistS.Ralgarh (C.G.) ^rsys 1. Dukalu Behra S/o not known, R/Q viliage- Taraimai", Up-Tahsii-Tamnar, Distl.Raiigarh 2, Nayab Tahsildar, Tamnafs Distt.Raigarh 3. Tahsildar, Tamnar, Distt.Ra^arh (CG.) 4. Sub Divisional Officer (R), Gharglwda, DSstt.Ralgarh (C.G.) 5 Coltector, Raigarh, Distt.Raigarh (C.©.) (Writ Petition under Artjcle 227 of frie Constttution of India.) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma, J.) Prssent: Mr.M.K.Sinha, coun^sl forthe petjtioners. Mr.Rakesh Jha, Deputy Government Advecate vAh Mr.Sanj@ev Kumar Agrawa!, Pane! lawyer for respondente No.2 to 5. , ORAL ORDER (Passed on 2S November, 2009) 1. By this petition under Article 227 of the ConstituUon of India, the petitioners has prayed for issuance ofwritin the nature of mandamus4o ttie autiiority to execute the order dated 8.4.2009 passed by respondent No2/Naib Tahsjldar, Tamnar, District Raigarh, in Revenue Case No.8/A-70/98-99. 2, I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that execution proeeedlng is pending since 2008. 4. From perusal of the order impugneci, it reveals that th@ order passerf by respondent No.2 has not been executed as yet. The authorities are requirecl to execute its order promptly. -2 5. In view of the above submission made learned couNsel for the petitiot'iers, respondent No.2/Naib Tahsildar, Tamnar is directed to ex«Gute its order as early as possible jn accordance with law. 6. The petition is disposed of accordingly. B/- Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge