IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24591 of 2010 MAQSOOD @ MISTER SON OF MAHFOOZ, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- NEW KARIMGANJ, P.S. CIVIL LINES, DISTRICT GAYA. – PETITIONER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR—OPP. PARTY. ----------- 2/ 02-08-2010 Heard the parties. In a criminal prosecution for offences under section 379/511 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner is alleged to have attempted to pick pocket of the informant. It is submitted that even according to prosecution case merely an attempt of committing theft was made but the offence was not complete. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that the petitioner is accused in some other criminal cases also. Be that as it may, in the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Gaya Rail P.S. Case No. 83 of 2010, subject to conditions that : (A) one of the bailors must be government servant, (B) another bailor shall be a close family member or the relation of the petitioner, 2 who will file an affidavit in the court below showing his/her relationship with the petitioner, (C) if the petitioner is found involved in same and similar nature of cases in future, then in that case the informant/ prosecution shall be at liberty to file a petition for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner, and if such a petition is filed, the court below would be obliged to dispose of the same in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned and (D) the petitioner shall make regular pairvi in the court below in the present case either by appearing himself in person or through representation by his lawyer on each and every dates, and if on two consecutive dates petitioner fails to make pairvi, then the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. BTiwary ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J)