IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Compounding Application No.749 of 2010 IN Criminal Misc. Application No.755 of 2008 (U/s 482 of Cr.P.C.) Jahangir Alam & another … Petitioners Versus N.B. Dangwal … Respondent Dated: July 21, 2010 Sri Prem Kaushal, learned counsel for the petitioners Sri Hem Chandra Joshi, Advocate for the respondent HON. DHARAM VEER, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material on record. By means of this application, the applicant has prayed to quash the summoning order dated 15.10.2008 as well as the further proceedings of Criminal Case No.55 of 2008, N.B. Dangwal Vs. Jahangir Alam & another, pending in the court of Special J.M., Almora u/s 323/504/506/ 325 IPC. A joint compounding application no.749/2010 has been filed by the learned counsel for both the parties along with which the affidavit of petitioner no.1-Jahangir Alam on his behalf and on behalf of petitioner no.2- Jaskaran Singh as well as the affidavit of injured Pankaj Dangwal (son of respondent) has been annexed. In both the affidavits, it has been stated that on the persuasion of the near and dear ones of both the parties, a compromise has been entered into both the parties without any fear, favour or prejudice. Further, the compromise was also reduced in writing between the parties and both the parties i.e. applicants and the injured have signed therein 2 voluntarily without any consideration, and the compromise arrived at between the parties has also been annexed with the application. Now, learned counsel appearing for both the parties jointly submitted that the instant petition may be disposed of in terms of the compromise arrived at in between the parties and the proceedings pending before the court below may be quashed. On a perusal of Section 320 Cr.P.C., which defines the compounding of offences, Sections 323/504/ 506/325 IPC are the offences which can be compounded with the consent of the Court. Having considered the compromise arrived at in between the parties and particularly the fact that the above-said offences are the compoundable offences, the compounding application no.749/2010 is allowed. The petition u/s C482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of in terms of the compromise arrived at in between the parties, which has also been annexed with the compounding application. The proceedings pending before the court of Special J.M. Almora in Criminal Case No.55 of 2008 U/s 323/504/506/325 IPC as well as the summoning order dated 15.10.2008 are hereby quashed. (Dharam Veer, J.) July 21, 2010 Rajeev Dang