XI-HC—zz mmmw Ba: V6 2&4-2393: - . ‘ Shri RS. Shrivastava, counsel for thtitio‘nér. H‘elard.‘ ¥ ~ _ ‘ By this p Won the CGffecme3$ Of he Order da been promoted fioner ha$ questiohed iégaiity, propriety and \ 14-8-2505 whereby respénderk N02 has Tne cialm of the peim ner Is that re$ponuent No 4 was Junior t0 me petitioner and by-passmg th claim of the petmoner respondent No 2 has been promoted Learned muusel *or 1‘ e netmoner *uhmittéd thy In this re$pect *he getiiioner sgbmi..ed a rep sewatlen Annexure—P!3 dated 233-20705 same is not being degwed by respondent 0.1 be directed to oecide representetiori of Ithe petitioner j :.. , ; - Requeet made by Iear ed counsei for the petitioner is inst fair and ieasonabie, therefore, reep ndent No.1 Le, the Dietriot and Seesions Judge-Burg ie directed to decide the repieseniation of the petitioner within 'ihe daie of feceipt-ei copy of this orden in raising his giievances but t ‘No‘ therefore respondent a period of 2 morths from accordance With iaw ‘ Witn tne direction afar; said, i‘ne petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.}F’. No.1528i2005 aiscstands disposed of. Parties are entitled for iaertified copy of this order; L ‘Sdl- L.C. Bhadoo Judge [new ' $ 5 ? ? ? epe p t i d i