1 WP No.6150/10 mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.6150 of 2010 M/s.Patel Biscuitwala & Sons & ors. ... Petitioners versus Mr.Bhogilal Jatubhai Mehta & ors. ... Respondents ... Ms.R.C.Nichani for the petitioners CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATED : 6th August 2010 P.C. 1. By this petition, petitioner challenges the order dated 29 June 2010 passed by Division Bench of the Small Causes Court, Mumbai dismissing the revision application filed by the petitioner. 2. Revision Application before the Small Causes Court was directed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 3 March 2009. Perusal of the order discloses that it is a procedural order. A Division Bench of this Court has held that a revision u/s. 29(3) of the Bombay Rent Act is not maintainable against a procedural order. Thereafter, a learned Single Judge of this Court 2 WP No.6150/10 has held that revision u/s.34(4) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, which is pari materia with section 29(3) of the repealed Bombay Rent Act, is not maintainable against a procedural order. Since the revision application itself was not maintainable, the order of the revisional court dismissing the revision application needs to be confirmed. Even otherwise, I am broadly in agreement with the observations made in the revisional order. Writ Petition is rejected summarily. (D.G. KARNIK,J.)