..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1798 OF 2007 Shri.Prakash Subhash Saymote and 3 Ors. ...Applicants. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Mr.Y.S.Ingale, Adv. for the Applicants. Mr.K.V.Saste, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 5th June, 2007. DATED : 5th June, 2007. DATED : 5th June, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicants and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking anticipatory bail in C.R.No.35 of 2007 of Shirol Police Station. The said case is under Sections 366, 379 read with 34 of IPC. The learned APP seeks time till 16.6.2007 to take instructions. However, the learned Advocate for the applicants states that in the meantime, the applicants may be protected. 3. It is seen that the applicants have directly approached this Court for anticipatory ..(2).. bail. In my opinion, it would be appropriate that the applicants prefer necessary application for anticipatory bail before the concerned Sessions Court. Liberty is granted to the applicants to prefer necessary application for anticipatory bail before the concerned Sessions Court. 4. To enable the applicants to prefer said application before the concerned Sessions Court, the applicants are granted protection in respect of arrest upto 16th June, 2007. In the event of arrest, the applicant to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each with one surety to make up the said amount. It is made clear that this order of interim protection will remain in operation only upto 16th June, 2007. 5. Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)