IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 20266 of 2011 Date of Decision:- 02.11.2011 M/s Mehta Construction Co. .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH Present:- Mr. Roopak Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. **** SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J(Oral). In the present writ petition, the primarily grouse of the petitioner is against respondent No. 4, which is a private company and not an instrumentality of the State within Article 12 of the Constitution of India. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid fact this writ petition is not maintainable as has already been held by this Court in CWP No. 19291 of 2011 titled Veena Kumari and another Vs. State of Punjab and others decided on 14.10.2011. Dismissed. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE 02.11.2011 ( PARAMJEET SINGH ) reema JUDGE