..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2193 OF 2008 Ravi Atmaram Gore. ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. .... Mr.R.R.Mahagaonkar, Adv. appointed for the applicant. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 2nd September, 2008. DATED : 2nd September, 2008. DATED : 2nd September, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate appointed for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in Sessions Case No.120 of 2005. The said case pertains to C.R.No.155 of 2004 of Bazar Peth police station. The said case is under Section 302 of IPC. In the alternative the applicant has prayed for expeditious disposal of the trial. 3. The learned APP states that eighteen witnesses have already been examined in the said ..(2).. case and only four to five witnesses remain to be examined. Looking to this fact, I am not inclined to grant bail to the applicant, at this stage. Application for bail is rejected. In case the trial is not concluded by 30th November, 2008, liberty to the applicant to prefer a fresh application for bail. 4. Criminal Application is disposed of. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)