IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 3 OF 2004 APPEAL NO. 3 OF 2004 APPEAL NO. 3 OF 2004 The State of Maharashtra .......Appellant. versus 1. Ganesh Narhari Kokate ) 2. Mahesh Narhari Kokate ) 3. Bebibai @ Kamal Shivaji ) 4. Narhari Balaji Kokate ) 5. Sumanbai Narhari Kokate )..... Respondents. ..... Ms. P.H.Kantharia APP for the state. Ms. Revati Mohite -Dere for respondents. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR ; V.G.PALSHIKAR ; V.G.PALSHIKAR & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED; DATED; DATED; 24TH SEPTEMBER, 2004. 24TH SEPTEMBER, 2004. 24TH SEPTEMBER, 2004. P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. By this appeal the State seeks to challenge the order of acquittal passed by the learned trial Judge on appreciation of evidence regarding the unnatural death of the victim, who was wife of accused no.1 and daughter- in -law of accused nos.4 and 5. From the appreciation of evidence as done by the learned trial Judge it is apparent that two views are possible. But merely because the two views are possible this court cannot not interfere in a view accepted by the learned trial Judge because it is neither purverse nor so grossly inconsistance with the evidece on record so as to require interference. Hence appeal rejected. ....