IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 21ST MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 4322 of 2010(M) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- V.P.GOPALAN, AGED 59 YEARS,S/O.LATE PAPY MECHANIC,(RETIRED), KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, RESIDING AT ASWATHY, THAKAZHI.P.O, AMBALAPPUZHA (VIA), ALLEPPEY. BY ADV. SRI.C.S.MANU SRI.S.K.PREMRAJ SRI.ABHILASH AKBAR SRI.T.B.SIVAPRASAD RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, CHENGANNUR. MR.V.V.N.NAMBIAR, SC FOR KSRTC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.4322 of 2010 (M) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 10th day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T Challenge in the writ petition is against Ext.P4. 2. Ext.P4 is a notice dated 11/11/2009 containing a proposal for recovery as provided in Rule 3 of Part-III KSR, and calling upon the petitioner to show case why the proposal shall not be finalised. Ext.P4 is only a notice, and if at all the petitioner is aggrieved, it is for him to show cause against Ext.P4. Therefore, I am not inclined to entertain the writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg