IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1051 of 2008 (M/S) Smt. Neelam Gupta & another. .……… Petitioners Versus Smt. Kusum Semwal & others. .……… Respondents Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, Advocate for the petitioners. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners, I feel totally disinclined to interfere with the impugned order, whereby the documents were taken on record through an affidavit on payment of costs and, subsequently, time for payment of costs was enlarged. No interference is called for. The writ petition is dismissed in limine. (V.K. Gupta, C. J.) 30.06.2008 G