IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20650 of 2010 RAJDEO SINGH SON OF RAM JAGAN SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----- 2. 17.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 413 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that four persons were apprehended on suspicion, from whose possession huge amount of money was recovered. They disclosed that they had committed dacoity of some trucks and on their disclosure some articles were recovered from the godown of one Suresh Prasad Singh and Raj Kishore Prasad. It has been submitted that the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report and subsequently his name transpired in the confessional statement of the co-accused but there has been no recovery from his possession. It has also been submitted that apart from the present case and the case instituted for recovery of the alleged looted articles from the godown of Raj Kishore Prasad and Suresh Prasad Singh, the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. This fact will be verified by the Magistrate concerned before releasing the petitioner on bail. In view of such, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the - 2 - satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in Mahua P.S. case No.305 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on the date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iv) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )