'-r>t£^ rni b.8. °3i tPett ^^.......^^ ^d»-^i^::. i^^-:...---" . aas / '^ocaw \n^ ^°^^ s^ • 4- 'ne!- St. 'nioinas C&flege Ruabandha, Bhilal, Through Pr. Jajnes Ver^ieese, Secretaiy, St. Thomas Matankara Orthodox Syrian Churcb Mission, Bhilai, (R/o St. Thomas Ashram, Kailash Nagar, Bhflai,) Dist:Durg-(C.G.j I. State of Chhattisgarh Thr&ugh The Secretary School Educatioa Department, Govt. of Chhattfs^rh, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, Dist: Raipur-(C.G.) 2. The Regioaal Director, National Council For Teacher Education Westem RegionaE Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shyam.la Hills, Bhopal-(M.P.} 3. The Director State Education Research & Training Counci! Shankar Ha^r, Raipur, Dist: Raipur-jC.G.j Pt. Ravi Shankar University, Through - The Registrar, Raipur, Dist: Raipur-(C.G.) (2) WRiT U/A 226 / 227 OF COSSTITOTIOH Gy HIGH COU^T OF JUDICATURE CHHAT-TISGARH : BILASPUK (DIVISION BE.NCH) COKAM: HON'BLB SHRI DHIRENUKA MISHRA, AND HQS'BLE SHRI SATISH KUIHAR AGNIHQTRI, JJ WB!T PE'TITION N0. 2829 OF 2006 Petitioiier : Maulana Azad CoUege of Education VESSUS Respondents : State ofChIiattisgarh & others. WRIT PBTI-TION N0. 4911 OF' 2006 Petitioner : G.D.R. Educational SocieW VERSUS Respondents : State of Chhattisgarb & others. WRI-T PETrTION N0. 4242 OE> 2006 l^euuoner : sj. u. Mamia Maiiavidyalaya VEjKSUS Respondents : State of CIUiattisgarli & ottiers. WRI'T' PBTTTION N0. 929 OF- 2006 Petitioner : St. Thoinas CoUege VEKSUS Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh & othei-s. WRI'T PE'TrTION N0. 951 OF' 2006 Petitioner : Christ College, Jagdalpur VEKSUS Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh & ofhers. 187 Petitioner Kespondents WMT PETITIQN NQ. 952 OP 2006 St. Viacent Palloti CoUege VERSOS State of Chiiatdsgarh & others. Present:- Mr. Sunu OTwani, Mr. PrafuU Bharat aiid Mr. S.K. Thoinau, learaea couasel tor uie peraioner (s). Mr. Vuiay Harit, learaed Dy. A.G., forthe State/respondents. Mr. P.K. Venaa, leanied Sr, Advocate wifh Mr. Raghvendra Verma, Mr. Jitendra Pali aad Mr. Gource Shaakar, leamed counsel lor ouier responclcnts. Director, State Education Research aad Tramuig Councfl is present ui person. QRDER {Passed oa 10"' Jaauary 2007) The foUowiag order of fhe Court was passed by Dhirendra Mlsbra, -I The above petitions are being disposed of by fhis coiBunon order as teamed counsel lor appeanng tor t&e parties jomuy submits fhat the facts and questiou of law involved in the present pentions are conuuon,. Mr. Vuiay Harit, learued Dy. A.G. appearing for Uie State/respondents on iastruction.s from. Director, State Education Research and Training Councfl states that fhe Govemiuent has deciued to inaKe aecessary amenaments in Uie prevalent law ui ttie Hght of decisions rendered by the Hoa'ble Supreine Court in tne niatters of Dr. Ptatteep Jaia etc Vs. uaion of India and otfaers (AIR 1984 S.C. 14201. The Kerala Educatlon Blll, 1957 (AIR l9S8_s.C^_956lt T.M.A. Pai FouadaUoa and others Vs. State^ KaraataRa and otiiers. (2002) 8 S.c.C. 481 aad P.A. Inamdar aad ottters Vs. state of Maharaslitra aad otliers, (20051 6 S.C.C. S37. He subiuits fhat fhe all fhis exercise, ia any case, wiu be conipleted before 31st March 2007, In view of the submission inade by Mr. Vinay Harit, leamed Dy. A.G., leamed counsel for the petitioners seek to withdraw uieir petitions wifh liberty to ffle afresh in. case any cause of actioa survives. However, fhey subinit fhat during pendency of these petitions effect and operation of the rules were slayed by this Court as a result of which the petitioners/iastitutions have adinitted students m. fheir iastitutions, therefore, intermi order passed by this Court Biav be directed to continue tiil fhe auiended niles are finaUy notified by the State Govenunent. Prayer niade by leamed counsel for the petitioners appears to be just aad reasonable. In view of submissions inade by fhe parties, the nistant peutions are disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file appropriaie proceediags avaUable under fhe law if cause of actioii siirvives to them after withdiawal of their petitions and me iaterim ord.er passed. Dy tbis Court troiu tune to tirne stiall reinain ui force nn the ameuded rules are notified bv fhe State. A copy of fhis order be placed on the record of flie connected writ peutious. j[^ Sdl- Dhirendra Mishra judge Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge ^'