IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9056 of 2009 RAVINDRA MAHTO @ RABINDRA MAHTO S/O-Shri Shridhar Mahto, R/O-Vill-Durgapatti, P.S.-Harlakhi, Distt.-Madhubani. ………………………………………Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …………………………………………..Opposite Party. ----------- 3/ 06.07.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and learned Counsel for the informant. The petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered for the offence under Sections 363/376/498 of the IPC. The informant’s daughter Mamta Devi aged 18 years was a married lady. She went out from her house to urinate but was kidnapped. The informant suspected that the petitioner might have kidnapped her. Submission is that the marriage of the informant’s daughter was not according to her choice so she repudiated her earlier marriage and has married with the petitioner. She has sworn an affidavit to that extent. Further 2 submission is that in course of investigation, the I.O. has telephoned upon the petitioner’s mobile which was picked up by Mamta Devi who told that she is with the petitioner and she has come to know that a case was lodged by in-laws against the petitioner. Prayer for bail of the petitioner has been opposed by learned Counsel for the informant. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani/concerned court in connection with Harlakhi P.S. Case No.- 78 of 2008/G.R. No.- 1869 of 2008. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)