IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20565 of 2010 PAPPU KUMAR YADAV, S/o Sri Sanjay Kumar Yadav. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 16.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report and subsequently when he was arrested in Motihari Town P.S. Case No. 385 of 2009 he is said to have confessed his complicity in the present case as well. It has further been submitted that there is no legal evidence against the petitioner and the father of the petitioner is ready to take responsibility of the petitioner’s conduct after releasing from jail custody. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Motihari Town P.S. Case No. 383 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the father of the petitioner. The 2 bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)