1 mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1471 of 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4701 of 1997 Chandrakant Patel .. Applicant versus Suryakant Shivlal Parmar .. Respondent ... Mr.C.D. Patil i/b Kanga & Co. for the applicant. Mr.C.M. Kothari for the respondent. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J DATED : 6th August 2008 P.C.: 1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. This application though opposed is granted in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) on condition that the deposit to be made by the applicant under this order shall be without prejudice to the rights 2 and contentions of the parties in the main petition. The applicant to deposit the amount within one week from today failing which writ petition to stand dismissed for non prosecution without further reference to the court. 3. At this stage, counsel for the respondent submits that the monthly compensation amount be enhanced. It is not possible to accept this submission across the bar. Counsel for the respondent refers to the averments made in affidavit in reply in this application. If the respondents are so advised, may take out application for appropriate reliefs which will be decided on its own merits. 4. Application is disposed of in the above terms. (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)