THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.27550 of 2008 Date : 17-6-2011 Between: GV & ADSL College of Education, Ongole, Prakasam District, represented by its Correspondent and Secretary Sri G.Veeranarayana Babu …Petitioner And The Acharya Nagarjuna University, rep.by its Registrar, Nagarjuna Nagar, Guntur District. …Respondent Counsel for the petitioner: None appeared Counsel for respondents: None appeared The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring Proceedings of the respondent No.ANU/Affil/Payment of Fees/2007- 08 dt.10-9-2008 demanding the Development Fee/Infrastructure Fee Rs.1,50,000/- for 100 students for the academic year 2007-08 even after collecting Affiliation fee Rs.48,000/- (each Rs.400/- for 100 candidates) in addition to the fee fixed by the Committee for Fixation of Fee Structure in Private Un-aided Professional Colleges constituted by the Govt.of A.P., prescribed under Andhra Pradesh Private Minority/Non-Minority (Aided/Unaided) Colleges of Education (Regulation of admissions into B.Ed., Course through Common Entrance Test) Rules, 2005 made under Andhra Pradesh Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions and Prohibition of Capitation Fee) Act, 1983 as illegal, arbitrary, without power or authority and opposed to Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same.” At the hearing, there is no representation for both the petitioner and the respondent. Earlier, this court disposed of similar writ petitions vide: order dated 08.02.2011 in W.P.No.27195/2007 and batch, which were allowed in the following terms: a) the writ petitions are allowed, setting aside the demand notices issued to the petitioners, on the ground that they are not based on any statute, ordinance or regulation, made under the A.P. Universities Act, 1991; b) it shall be open to the University to inquire as to whether the petitioners have collected any amount from the students, towards development fee/infrastructure fee, and if it emerges that the fee has been collected, the petitioners shall be under obligation to refund the same to the students, or pay it to the University; and c) if any statement made by the petitioners in this regard is found to be incorrect, that would, by itself, be a ground to deny the renewal of affiliation. Following the same, this Writ Petition is also allowed in terms of the above re-produced order. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.36095 of 2008 is disposed of as infructuous. _________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date : 17-6-2011 AM