Cr.Misc. M 7085 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 7085 of 2009 Date of decision:- 19.1.2010 Sumit Aggarwal petitioner vs State of Haryana and others Respondent Present: Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate Ms. Shubra Singh, DAG, Hry Mr. Ravinder Singh, Advocate. M.M.S.BEDI,J. Respondents 2 and 3 had been granted anticipatory bail by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Panchkula vide order dated 8.7.2008. The petitioner has sought cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the said respondents by filing the present petition under Section 439 (2) Cr.P.C. on the ground that the said respondents have indulged in the similar activities, which would hamper smooth investigation of the case. In support of his contention, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on Ram Singh vs State of Haryana and others 2005(1) RCR ( Criminal) 36, contending that it has been laid in the said judgment that if an accused indulges in similar activities, which would hamper smooth investigation, it is one of the grounds for cancellation of bail. He has contended that seven circumstances have been enumerated in the said judgment on the basis of which bail can be cancelled. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and going through the facts and circumstances of this case, I am of the opinion that Cr.Misc. M 7085 of 2009 2 respondents 2 and 3 have not, in any manner, misused the liberty. They have also not violated any of the conditions of bail. It is observed that the grounds mentioned in Ram Singh's case (supra) are illustrative and exhaustive as per the judgment of the Apex Court in Raghbir Singh and others vs. State of Bhar, 1986(4) SCC 481. In case respondents 2 and 3 have committed the offence of cheating with other complainants, the same cannot be considered a sufficient ground to cancel the bail, especially when there has not been any violation of any of the conditions. It has been informed that challan has already been presented and charges also stand framed and now the case is fixed for prosecution evidence. No ground for cancellation of bail is made out. Dismissed. January 19 ,2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) TSM JUDGE