°Bt IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION No.^+6& /2006 PBTITIONER ,^^- -•••" ^g^>' ./-^3?"' ^^". ^" '^ESS'tiS RESPONDENTS ^\- ,»' * If .. ff 'A / 1&, 1 '^ tv^ul'A, '?t '^-- „. .^ ~;i ^s • /2- -3- •^^ Ram nath, S/o Birbal Gond, Age -48 years, R/o - Village Bargidih, P.S. Dhourpur, Distt.- Surguja (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary (Schedxiled Tribes and Scheduled Caste Development Department) D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) Collector Surguja (Aadiwashi Vikas) Ambikapur, Distt.- Siu-guja C.G. Commissnor (Scheduled Caste &Scheduled tribes ) D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) PETITION ^JNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE DIRECTIONS. ORDERS OR WRITS INCLUDING WRITS IN THE NATURE OF NANDANAS CERITIORARI PROHIBITION ETC. KI-HC-22 3(1^1 qff 'fg'ri^siii?! *4 V^ ^ Bsn/e .^ TS[ "4ww'Li, aTil'y4i<», faywy ^ ^v' llltlMI WWh^...^.^.^....4^b^0^ \" fa'b<8r' •ai^i^mw:'((te( 10^.2008 Mr, Neeraj Mehta, counss! Mr. Satish Gupta,. Dep]t respondents. Heard both the counsel. By.the tnstant petition, th« Master/in-charge PrincipaJ, Gove< <5U®sii<2n®dth® order dated 2^ dismissed from tho service cn aci of the i.P.C. and eonsequent Surguja dated 20 Aprii 2006for r^ As per Ruie 23 of the C.G.I impugned orders are efficacious a'.ternath./e rsmedy av^ be entsrtained and sams is dismi! before the appropriate authority, if Lsamed counse! for the iinpusned c.rders Annexure-P/1 & Rsgjstry is direeted to AiiP.ev.i!fs'P/1 & P/2 to le3f?3sd cou Consoqusntiy, M.(W.)P. aisostand disposed of. uflon <t>w(fi41-i *iw^f'^'fetst <RiKzi< ^; S|P<PT 311^1 the petitioner. Govt. Advocate for the Stafe/ petitionsr, who was workmg as Head nment Hjgh Schooi, Doomardeeh, has .3-2006 vs/hsrsby the petition&r was ;ount of conviction "under Section 304-A the orde-r passed by ths Coiiector, icovery of tne amount. Civii Sen/ices (C.C.A.) Ruies, 1966, the 'te, thus the petitioner has equalfy ll^b'e, th^rQfof^, this wr't pstit'ors C^HHQ? ssed. The psiiUonsr may fite an appeai petRioner submitted thai, copy of the f/2 may be retumecs to hm. iturn eopy of the impugned ordsrs coi^isel for the petiiioner as per Rutes. and !.A. N0.4852/2006 Sd;- L.C. Bhadoo Judge [Tft^ ^f<Si4