IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4561 of 2008 ANURADHA PANJIYAR & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 03.09.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are accused in a case registered for the offences under Sections 498A, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3, 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the present complaint has been filed for ulterior purposes in order to resolve the family differences on account of business of dairy and running of Sumo vehicle. It is further submitted that during the pendency of the case the matter got amicably settled and the dairy business and Sumo vehicle were given to the complainant and as per the terms of their settlement they started acting thereon. It is further contended that a petition for compromise has been filed in the Court below and in this case also an interlocutory application has been filed stating to the effect that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and the affidavit has been sworn by the father of the husband as well as the father of the complainant. Having considered the submissions, as noticed - 2 - above, and in the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, the petitioners, namely, Anuradha Panjiyar, Sanjeev Panjiyar, Manoj Kumar Panjiyar & Dev Narayan Panjiyar be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1046 of 2005 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)