IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO.1010 OF 2009 Dt.04.2.2010 Between: Balanagu Vasantha Kumari and others … Appellants And Municipal Corporation of Rajahmundry Rep. by its Commissioner and others … Respondents Counsel for the Appellants : Sri A. Sanjeeva Kumar Counsel for Respondent No.1: Sri A. Vishnuvardhan Reddy Counsel for Respondent No.2: G.P. for Revenue THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO.1010 OF 2009 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy) The petitioners in Writ Petition No.20063 of 2002 filed this Writ Appeal, feeling aggrieved by order dt.1.12.2008 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the said Writ Petition. We have heard Sri A. Sanjeev Kumar, learned Counsel for the appellants, and Sri A. Vishnuvardhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.1 – Municipal Corporation. The appellants filed the Writ Petition questioning the endorsement dt.10.6.2002 whereby respondent No.1 had fixed the cost of each plot admeasuring 266.66 sq. yards at Rs.3,68,000/-. The learned Counsel for the appellants submitted that his clients are willing to pay the said rate. In view of this stand, the grievance expressed in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration. The Writ Appeal is accordingly disposed of with liberty to the appellants to make appropriate representation to respondent No.1 in the matter of allotment of the house sites. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Appeal, W.A.M.P. No.2027 of 2009, filed by the appellants for interim relief, is disposed of. ______________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ ______________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 04.2.2010 bnr