1 cri.appln.878 of 2008 hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 878 OF 2010 Rajan Vargis Chavan and Ors. ... Applicants Versus State of Maharashtra ... Respondents Mr. B.A. Aloor for the applicants. Mr. Pravin N. Padave h/for Mr. Kuldeep S. Patil for respondent no. 2. Mrs. M.R. Tidke, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J. DATED : FEBRUARY 08, 2011 P.C. 1. This application has been filed by the original complainant for quashing of her own complaint. The complaint has resulted into conviction of the respondent nos. 1 to 4 for the offences punishable under section 452, 363 and 323 read with section 34 of Indian Penal Code. The convicted accused persons have already preferred appeal being Criminal Appeal No. 323 of 2008 in which the present application has been taken out. The 2 cri.appln.878 of 2008 offences punishable under section 452 and 363 of Indian Penal Code are not compoundable. Therefore, the present application has been moved by the original complainant. 2. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that respondent nos. 1 to 4 being family members, the applicant has now resolved the dispute and she does not desire to pursue the complaint. It cannot be said that the dispute in the complaint is purely personal. It does not arise out of any commercial transaction between the parties. It also cannot be said that the dispute does not affect the public policy. The facts of the case show that the respondent to settle the personal score had taken law in their hands which conduct can not be ignored by quashing the proceedings. In any case respondent nos. 1 to 4 have already challenged the order of their conviction by preferring appeal. Surprisingly the application for quashing has been filed not by the accused by by the complainant. Hence, application is dismissed. [Judge]