IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CLMA DELAY CONDONATION APPLICATION NO. 3683 OF 2008 MCC RESTORATION APPLICATION NO. 682 OF 2008 IN WPSS No. 1504 of 2001 Shri Akram Husain …………….Petitioner Versus Deputy Director, Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, Uttar Pradesh and others. ………..Respondents. Mr. Ashish Kumar Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner. None appears for the respondents. 8th August, 2008 Hon’ble P.C.Verma, J. Perused the grounds shown for delay in filing the recall application. The reasons are satisfactory to condone the delay. Delay is condoned. Perused the grounds shown for recalling the order dated 3.3.2008. The reasons are satisfactory to recall the order-dated 3.3.2008. Order dated 3.3.2008 is recalled. Both the applications are allowed. Writ petition is restored to its original number. Heard counsel for both the parties. Petitioner has an alternative remedy to approach the Public Service Tribunal for redressal of his grievance. The writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy and the petitioner is relegated to approach the Public Service Tribunal. Registry is directed to transmit the paper book of the case to Public Service Tribunal. (P.C. Verma, J.) 8.8.2008 Rathour