dmt 1 wp8587-10 IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8587 OF 2010 Durgesh Vasantrao Shinde & Ors. .... Petitioners. vs. CITI Bank N.A. .... Respondent. Mr. Girish Paryani for the Petitioners.. Ms. K. Anchan i/by M.V. Kini & Co. for the Respondent. CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 23 SEPTEMBER, 2011. P.C. The Petitioners have an alternate remedy available of an appeal before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal against the order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal dated 14 September 2010. In that view of the matter, we dismiss the writ petition leaving it open to the Petitioner to pursue the alternate remedy. dmt 2 wp8587-10 2. By an order dated 20 October 2010, the Division Bench of this Court had directed that if physical possession is not taken from the Petitioners the same shall not be taken until the next date. This order was extended on 2 December 2010. Accordingly, there shall be a direction to the effect that while it will be open to the Respondent to take symbolic possession of the secured assets, the Respondent shall not take forcible possession for a period of four weeks from today. In the meantime, it would be open to the Petitioners to move the D.R.A.T. for appropriate orders. If no interim orders are passed by the D.A.R.T. within the aforesaid period, it would be open to the Respondent to take further recourse to its powers in accordance with law. (A.A. SAYED, J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J)