THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.937 of 2002 DATED: 15-07-2010 ORDER: This revision is filed by the petitioner, questioning the order, dated 03-06-2002, passed in M.P.No.67 of 2002 in M.C.No.23 of 2002 by the learned Family Judge, Secunderabad. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the 1st respondent herein filed M.C.No.23 of 2002, claiming maintenance against her husband-petitioner herein and pending the same, she filed M.P.No.67 of 2002 seeking interim maintenance and the learned Family Judge by order, dated 03-06-2002, allowed the said application and awarded interim maintenance @ Rs.1500/- to the 1st respondent herein. The same is questioned by the petitioner herein-husband in this revision. 3. In my considered view, this revision must have become infructuous for the reason that the maintenance case must have been over by now. Further, the Court below having considered the fact that the petitioner is getting a monthly pay of Rs.3056/-, even after deductions, awarded the said amount of Rs.1500/- towards maintenance to the 1st respondent herein, which in my considered view, cannot be said to be arbitrary or excessive. 4. Accordingly, Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. _______________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA,J 15th July, 2010. Tsy