1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1946 OF 2005 Rajan Madhukar Thakur ... Petitioner Vs. Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai. ... Respondents Mr. P.A. Chodhankar i/by P.A. Sawant for Petitioner. Ms. Trupti Puranik for R. No. 1. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2006 DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2006 DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . A notice was issued to the Petitioner under Section 55 of the M.R.T.P. Act on 6.6.2005. It is the case of the Petitioner that representation made by then have not been considered. If the Petitioner’s structure was existing and is protected by any scheme framed by the State of Maharashtra Respondent NO. 1, then the Petitioner also be given such protection. However, we do not propose to interfere in the matter in exercise of our extra ordinary jurisdiction. . With the above observations, Petition disposed of. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)