IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 10091 of 2010 Date of Decision: 26.5.2010 Indermohini ....Petitioner. Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. S.S. Salar, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. In this petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No.2 to execute the conveyance deed in her favour. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has sent a legal notice dated 5.4.2010 (Annexure P-4) to respondent No.2 for the same relief as claimed in this writ petition but no action has been taken thereon so far and she shall feel satisfied if a direction is issued to him to take a decision on the same in a given time frame. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the file, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to take a decision on the legal notice (Annexure P- 4) sent by the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. May 26, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE