IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE SECOND APPEAL NO.625 OF 2001 -------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders -------------------------------------------------------- Mr.P.S.Dani for the appellants. Mr.N.V.Bandiwadekar for Respondents. Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Date : 11.8.2005. 1. There is a concurrent finding by the two lower Courts which have decreed the plaintiff’s suit for injunction. It has been observed that in respect of the suit land there has been an oral partition which has been recorded vide mutation entry no.301. The said mutation entry is of the year 1960 and thereafter 7/12 extracts support the case of the plaintiff as his name is shown from 1960 in respect of 10 annas and 8 pai whereas the defendant is shown in possession of 5 anna and 5 pai. : 2 : 2. In the circumstances, no substantial question of law is involved. Appeal is dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) : 3 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.783 OF 2001 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.625 OF 2001 -------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders -------------------------------------------------------- Mr.P.S.Dani for the appellants. Mr.N.V.Bandiwadekar for Respondents. Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Date : 11.8.2005. 1. As the main appeal is dismissed, Civil application does not survive and disposed of accordingly. (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J)