IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42397 of 2009 JAGESHWAR BHUIYAN, SON OF LATE BHATU BHUIYAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PAWAI, P.S. SIRDALLA, DISTRICT- NAWADA…………………………………………PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR……………………….OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate. For the State : Mr. R.P.S. Singh, A.P.P. ---------- 2. 9.12.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. This is a case of misuse of privilege of bail. The bail bond of the petitioner was cancelled on 9.5.2005 for the reason that after his release upon grant of bail he remained absent from trial. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is an old person aged about 70 years. It is stated that the co- accused used to make pairvi on his behalf but somehow or the other subsequently he left the pairvi in this case. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Jageshwar Bhuiyan, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- 2 (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-cum- F.T.C.-IInd, Nawada, in connection with S. Tr. No.12/09 arising out of Sirdalla P.S. Case No.52/87, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be the close relative or his family member, who will file affidavit before the court below giving full genealory showing his relationship with the petitioner. It is further made clear that the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial unless his presence is dispensed with by the court concerned in accordance with law, failing which his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the concerned court. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)