PETITIONERS] PLAINTIFFS HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (227) NO. 3960/2010 Ashok Kumar S/ o Rattan Lal Kesharwani, aged about 42 years. Devendra Kumar, S/o Ratag Lal Kesharwani, aged about 32 years. Mahendra Kumar, Sio Ratan L81 Keshalwani, aged about 30 yeaxs, A11 1 to 3 are residents of Village Tata, Tahsil Bilaigarh, Distt. Raipur-(C.G.)‘ Ram Lal S/ o Tarachand Kesharwani, aged about 7 1 years. lal SI o Tarachand Kesharwani, (death) Pvara Sahodri Bai Wd/o Pyare lal Keshaxwani aged 69 years. Kamal Kishor S/o Pyare lal Keshaxwatli aged 52 years. Nawal Kishor S/o Pyare lal Keshalwani aged .39 years. A11 Rio Ranisagar, SaraJigarh, Tah-Sarangarh DiSt, Raigarh. Jugai Kishor S/o Pyare lal Kesharwani’ aged 49 years, Rfo Village Tata (Near Village Manpasar) TAhsil Bilaigarh, Durgesh Nandini w/o Vijay Keshalwani aged 46 years. Rajani W/o Anil KeshaIWani aged 41 yea1s Respondent No. 5 8r, 6 Village shivrinarayan Tahsil Navagarh Distt.- Jarijgir Champa (C.G.). Bha‘gwaxi Prasad, s/O Tarachand Keshazwani, aged abom 64 years, A11 1 to 3 are residents of Village Tata, Tahsil Bilaigarh, Distt. Raipur (0G,). State of Chhattisgarh Through —Collector, Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSITTUTION OF INDIA. RESPONDENTSI DEFENDANTS VER§IJS 1. 2. Presentz— Shri CR. Sahu, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Rakesh Jha, Dy. GA. for the State] respondeut No. 4. None for the respondent No. 1 to 3. ORAL- ORDER (Passed on 30/07/2010) (SB :Hon’ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) 1. Heard. ,1 2. Oldar Impugned dated 9/4/ 10 passed by Second Addmonal D1sfnct Judge Baloda Bazar 111 Mlsc C1V1l Appsal No 9] 2008 and order dated 23,! 10/2008 passed by Civil Judge Class-2 Bhilaigarh in civil suit No. 1 1—A/08 whereby temporéry injunction against the present petitioners have been granted in favour of the respondents No. 1, 2 ($5 3 pemsed. On perusaL I do not fmd any illegality requiring any interference by invoking the provisions of Under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Consequently, this petition is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. 3. A11 interim applications are also dismissed. 4. No order as to costs.