IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 16TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 25TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 27645 of 2010(Q) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- NAVEEN THOMAS, ADVOCATE, AGED 32 YEARS, PRACTISING AT ERNAKULAM, S/O.N.C.THOMAS, NETTIKKADEN HOUSE, GODOWN ROAD, EDAPPALLY TOLL, KOCHI-24. BY ADV. SRI.RENJITH THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, COCHIN - 31. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUVATTUPUZHA POLICE STATION, PIN-686 661. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.27645 of 2010 (Q) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 16th day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner’s grievance is that though he made an application to the 2nd respondent for providing details of the entries made in the General Dairy mentioned by the 2nd respondent in respect of 17/01/2010, 18/01/2010 & 19/01/2010, the information as sought for is not furnished. 2. In view of the general information that was sought for by the petitioner from the 2nd respondent, this Court asked the petitioner about the particular informations that he wanted to get from the respondent. Then, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that what is sought for is information regarding the time of arrest of the first accused in C.C.No.408/2010, time of lodging the FIR and the time at which the occurrence was reported to the Police Station. From the copy of the application made by the petitioner, it is seen that these particulars are not mentioned in the application. 3. If that be so, the remedy available to the petitioner is to WP(C) No.27645/2010 -2- make a fresh application disclosing the particular informations that he wants, to the 2nd respondent, in which event, the 2nd respondent will take appropriate steps for disclosure of the aforesaid informations. It is directed that if an application is made as above, the information will be provided to the petitioner within one week thereafter. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment also along with the application before the 2nd respondent for compliance. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg