R' W.P. 181 Np. S673Lof2007 Lalit Kum.ar Yadav, Adopted Soii of Late Shri Bodhan Ram, aged about 27 years, R/o. Nayapara Ward, Bhatapara, District- Raipur (C.G.) Versus 1 State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretaiy, PubUc Works Departnient, D.K.S. Bhavaa, Maatralaya, District- Ralpur (C.G.) 2 Engmeer-ia-Chief, Public Works Departiaent, Sirpur Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 3 Superintendent Enguieer, Public Works Department, Raipur Division, Raipur (C.G.) 4 Executi.ve Engiaeer, PubUc Works Departinent, Baloda Bazar, District- Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLB 226 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearaace: Sbri Suiul Otwaai, counsel for fhe petitioner. Sbri Yashwaat Siiigh, Govt. Advocate for fhe State/ respondents , on advance copy. (25.09.20071 SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard finally wifh tbe consent of fhe pardes. The brief facts are fhat the fatber of fhe petitioner was working as a Peon in Pablic Works Departmeut, who died on 20.1.2001. Thereafter, the petitioner inoved. an applicafiou tbr compassionate appoiatuieut on 28.3.2001 aad Eunofher appUcation was nioved on 28.12.2006 wifh aU required forms, testunoiuals (Aimexure-P/2). The submission of learaed counsel for tfae petitioner is fhat fhough tiie application ni appropriate form, as directed, was inoved on 28.12.2006, no decisioa has been taken on the said appUcation aad as per fhe knowledge of the petitioner, the same W.P. (S) N0.5671/2CX37 is pendiag ia oflice of respondent No.4. He subinits that fhere is a poUcy ofthe State bearmg No. F-7-4/2002/l-3, Raipur dated 10th June, 2003, according to which the case of the petitioner has to be considered aiid disposed of at the earliest. Presently, he inakes a lunited prayer that fhis petition inay be disposed of wifh a direction to fhe conceraed aufhority, particularly respondents No. 2, 3 Ss 4to dispose of fhe appUcation tor coiupassionate appointiaent filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-P/ 2. This lixaited prayer inade by learaed counsel for fhe petitioner is not opposed by fhe learaed for fhe State. The same is aUowed. Accordtagly, it is directed that if fhe appUcation filed by the petitioner has not been disposed of so far, it shall be disposed of wifhia a period of 3 uionths froin fhe date of production of certified copy of this oider along wifh copy of writ petition and docunient annexed with it by respondents No. 2, 3 & 4 ia accordaace with law and tfae result shaU be coiiunuiucated to fhe petitioner. The petitioner shall be obliged to ffle fhese docuiuents wittim a period of3 weeks froin today. The petition stands fiuaUy disposed of. - -———_ Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge tatti ^-