1 cri appln 288.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 288 OF 2010 Mithu S/o Tukaram More .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents Shri B. V. Thombre, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri V. G. Shelke, A.P.P. for the Respondent No. 1. Ms. Sharda P. Chate, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. CORAM : S. S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 01ST MARCH, 2011. PER COURT : . In pursuance to the non bailable warrant issued against the respondent No. 2 Bhagwan Dnyanoba More is brought before the Court. The counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2 in this application assures this Court that henceforth the respondent No. 2 will not indulge in any quarrel or will not give any threats or will not do any other acts so as to disturb the original complainant/present applicant. 2 cri appln 288.10 2. Upon hearing the counsel appearing for the applicant i. e. original complainant, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2 and learned A.P.P., I am inclined to release the respondent No. 2 subject to furnishing bond of good behaviour to the satisfaction of the concerned police officer. On furnishing necessary bond of Rs. 5,000/- and one surety of like amount the respondent No. 2 be released by the concerned police officer. In the light of above the Criminal Application No. 288/2010 stands disposed of. 3. It is needless to mention that the presence of concern police officer stands dispensed with. [S. S. SHINDE, J.] bsb/March. 11