^ ^^^^—^^^ ,.1-l^.L^^.. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION {Cl N0...&.?£.e/2006 PETITIONER - Balram Smha, S/o Shri Shyamlal/' Sinha, aged about 30 years, R/o ^/^v\. (-^v-/fc4;>£» Rajim, TahsiI-Gariyaband, Distt.- ^y^ R°pur' C^ VERSUS RESPONDENTS - Regional Transport Authority,,, Chhattisgarh at Raipur. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^?? -...-f-"'"'-1. XI-HC-78 35T-<<i<<i<iq, ®T{IU'I(B,Ricti«y *<l*<Mlsb*ll<t> —^^. 6^ W^ 200 3TI^T CR%' (yat^q^isT) an^TqiTf^iN; (PTTSn^Tshliq) ^ y gwiWtriN'sn^r <tii<ifin<fl-i >:i!ti<vtT^'fe<^t<R]trii< ^sri^Trsn^r 24.11.2006 Shri Anshul Shrivastava, ^fvocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Governn|ient Advocate for the State. Heard. The petitioner has preferre|d this writ petition with a prayer that respondent No.1 be directed to ccjnsider the applicatton <rf the petitioner for grant of regular stage carriage ()ermit on the route Raipur to Rajim via Abhanpur, Manichaori, Navapara 4nd return. The petitioner applied fbr |regular permit on ttie said route on 06.07.2005, but respondent No.]l is not considering the petitioner's application. The prayer made by learr^ed counset for the petitioner is that respondent No.1 may be directe]d to consider the applicatton of the petitioner in accordance with l|aw, to which learned Government Advocate for the State has noobje Having heard learned coun^el for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of th4 case, respondent No.1 is directed to consider the application of the carriage permit on the above route of two months from the date of rec^ipt of copy of this order. With the direction aforesaid, Certified copy ofthis order a stion. petitioner for grant of regutar stage in accordance with law within a period the petition stands disposed of. Consequentty, M.Cfl/.)P. N|o.4762/06 & I.A. No.11108/C» ateo stand disposed of. s per rule. P.T.O.