IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 8TH MARCH 2011 / 17TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 7253 of 2011(F) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- RAJITHA.M,PEON,(UNDER SUSPENSION), JOINT R.T.OFFICE,KODUVALLY,RESIDING AT "SANDWANAM",P.O.PADANILAM,KUNNAMANGALAM, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REP.BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT(C)DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER,TRANSPORT COMMISSIONERATE TRANS TOWER,VAZHUTHAKKAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.ANTONY MUKKATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No. 7253 of 2011 ================== Dated this the 8th day of March, 2011 J U D G M E N T By Ext.P1 order, the petitioner, who is a Peon in the office of the Joint RTO, Koduvally, was suspended from service. The petitioner is challenging the said suspension. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. 3. I am not inclined to interfere with the suspension as such. But I think that after having initiated disciplinary proceedings by suspending the petitioner on 18.5.2010, the respondents have a duty to conclude the disciplinary proceedings expeditiously. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to see that the disciplinary proceedings initiated by Ext.P1 against the petitioner are completed and taken to its logical conclusion, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge