1 APPLN 83 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.83 OF 2011 Nirav C. Rajparia .....Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..... Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.84 OF 2011 Nirav C. Rajparia .....Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..... Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.85 OF 2011 Chandrakant J. Rajparia .....Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..... Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.86 OF 2011 Chandrakant J. Rajparia .....Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..... Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.87 OF 2011 Sheetal C. Rajaparia @ Sheetal Nimeshkumar Doshi .....Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..... Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.88 OF 2011 Indira C. Rajparia .....Applicant 2 APPLN 83 of 2011 V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..... Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.89 OF 2011 Reena C. Rajparia @ Reena A. Shah .....Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..... Respondents Ms.Nisha Parmar, for the applicants. Smt.M.M.Deshmukh, APP, for the State. CORAM :U.D.SALVI, J. DATE : 13TH APRIL, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard. 2. Service of notice is complete. 3. Perused the applications. Pursuit of the wrong legal remedy has resulted in the delay in preferring the above applications for leave to prefer appeals. Reasons given for delay in para No.4 of the applications have remain uncontroverted. Delay is condoned. Leave applications be posted for hearing. 4. Issue notice to the contesting respondent No.2 in the Applications for Leave to prefer appeal, returnable on 08-06-2011. ( U.D.SALVI, J. )