IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 2ND ASWINA 1930 RP.No. 999 OF 2008() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN SA.42/1994 Dated 27/06/2007 (A.S.41/1983 OF SUB COURT, KOTTARAKKARA O.S.189/1980 OF MUNSIFF’S COURT, KOTTARAKKARA) .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/APPELLANT:: ---------------------- PADMAKUMARI AMMA, D/O. CHELLAMMA, PERUMKULLUPUTHEN VEEDU, PERUMKULATHUMURI, KULAKKADA VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.SAJU.S.A SRI.VINOD RAVINDRANATH RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. KUNJUKUTTY AMMA SAROJINI AMMA, PUTHENPURA VADAKKATHIL VEEDU, PERUMKULATHUMURI, KULAKKADA VILLAGE. 2. VIJAYAKUMARI AMMA D/O. CHELLAMMA, PERUMKULLUPUTHEN VEEDU, PERUMKULATHUMURI, KULAKKADA VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI. C.V. VASUDEVAN FOR R1 & 2 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: RP 999/2008 OR DER ON I.A.1995OF 2008 IN RP 999 OF 2008 DISMISSED 24.9.2008 SD/- M. SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE. Okb/- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE M. SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J. ------------------------------------------ C.M.Appl.No.678 of 2008 and R.P. No. 999 of 2008 in S.A.No.42 of 1994 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 24th day of September, 2008 O R D E R This petition is filed to review the judgment after condoning the delay of 407 days in filing the application. I do not find any apparent error or other sufficient reasons to review the judgment. In such circumstances the delay need not be condoned. Petitions are dismissed. M. SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE Okb/-