IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CR No. 103 of 2010 Decided on: 21.12.2010 Satya Devi and others. …Petitioners Versus Sanjay Sood …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner : Mr. Rama Kant Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Satyen Vaidya, Advocate. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. Rama Kant Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner on the basis of instructions imparted to him by his client, submits that the present petition will be withdrawn in case the landlord permits the tenant to stay in the demised premises for a period of 2 ½ years. Mr. Satyen Vaidya, learned counsel for the respondents has agreed to this proposal. 2. Consequently, the tenant is directed to hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to the landlord on or before 30th June, 2013. He shall pay the agreed rent regularly. He shall clear all the arrears within a period of three months from today, if any. It is made clear that the terms and conditions to be incorporated in the usual undertaking are required to be implemented and followed 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No -2- faithfully and punctually. Any dereliction or violation of the terms and conditions of the usual undertaking will amount to contempt of Court. The undertaking be furnished within a period of three weeks from today. 3. Accordingly, in view of the above discussion, the petition is disposed of. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge December 21, 2010 (K. Attri)