IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 4TH MARCH 2011 / 13TH PHALGUNA 1932 RP.No. 142 of 2011() --------------------------- (AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN W.P(C) NO.10483/2010 DATED 14.10.2010 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT) .................................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS: ------------------------------------------------------- 1. P.DILEEP, S/O.A.K.PURUSHOTHAMAN, NJANAMBIKA MANDIRAM, THEKKEVILA P.O., MUNDAKKAL VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. K.BALACHANDRAN PILLAI, S/O.KRISHNA PILLAI, KALEELIL PADINJATTATHIL, MAYYANAD VILLAGE, MAYYANAD P.O., KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN W.P : -------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, KILIKOLLOOR BRANCH, REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER. 2. T.DOMINIC, S/O.K.B.THOMAS, KOCHUVEETTIL, ERNAKULAM VILLAGE P.O, KOLLAM TALUK. PIN- 691 326. R1 BY ADV.SHRI.R.S.KALKURA, SC. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: KRK THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J. ==================================== R.P.No.142 of 2011 in W.P(C) No.10483 of 2010 ==================================== Dated this the 04th day of March, 2011 O R D E R Review Petitioners (petitioners in Writ Petition) seek review of judgment dated October 14, 2010 on the ground that they are unable to pay the amount as directed by this Court in the judgment sought to be reviewed. Learned counsel submitted that respondent No.1 has agreed to give petitioners more convenient facility for discharging the decree debt. 2. Having heard learned counsel I do not find reason to review the judgment under challenge. But I make it clear that notwithstanding the judgment dated October 14, 2010 and the directions contained therein it is open to respondent No.1 to give more convenient facility to the petitioners for discharging the decree debt if respondent No.1 is willing to do so. It is open to the learned Principal Munsiff, Kollam to grant time and pass appropriate orders in that line notwithstanding the judgment in W.P (C) No.10483 of 2010. If that does not happen, petitioners will be R.P.No.142 of 20111 -: 2 :- bound to comply with the directions in the judgment dated October 14, 2010 and the learned Munsiff may re-schedule the time for payment of the amount as directed in the judgment of this Court. Review Petition is closed with the above direction. THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE. vsv