29.9.2008 Present: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for the appellant. M/s. B. C. Negi & Vivek Thakur, Advocates, for respondents 1 to 3 & 5(a). Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Dy. A. G. for respondent No. 4. RFA No. 217/2004 Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the present appeal is squarely covered by the decision rendered by this Court in RFA Nos. 88, 89, 90 & 91 of 2003, on 24.4.2008 as this case arises out of the same acquisition proceedings and could not be taken on the date when the said matters were disposed of. I have seen the decision of this Court in RFA No.88 of 2003 titled as Union of India vs. Gurnima. The acquisition proceedings in both the cases are same. The village and the public purpose is also the same. Therefore, the impugned Award dated 28.6.2002 is upheld and the judgment dated 24.4.2008 shall be read as part of the present appeal. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. ( Sanjay Karol ), Judge. September 29, 2008 (rana)