‘ HIGH COURT OF CHHA’I‘TIS(}ARH AT BILASPUR WRI'I' PETITION (S) No. 4593 of2008 E PE’ITI‘IONER : Akaloo Ram Mahxlange S/o Bmelal Mahllange Aoed about 401 years R/o Villagg Parasbode Iahsxl & D1stt Rajnandgaon (C G ) ' VERSUS ‘ jRESPONDENTS : I... 81am of (/hhalimgarh Through — Secretary, suheduled Tnbe $cheduled Castes aild othel Backward Ciass Welfare Depaximem DKS Bhawm Rdlpul; Dlstt Raxpur (C G) 2. The Collector, Rajnandgaon Distt Rajnandgaon '(C.G.) WRIT PE’I‘ITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUHON OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish‘ K. Agni‘hotri, J. resent: Smt. Meena Shastri. Advocate for the petitioner P Shri Arun Sao, Gm/emment Advoeate for the State/respondents; ORAL ORDER (Passed on 27% day of XLIéust, 2008) .1. With the consent of the ’paities, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. '2. The case of the petitioner is that he was appointed aS Cook (Class 1V Emp1oyee) in Kanya Shiksha Parishath Chowki, Dietrict Rajnandgaom on 28.03.1998 under ‘Anusuchit Jati/Janjati 'Vishesh Bhaitiya Abhiyan’ by the concerned Collector as per merit Est prepared by the selection committee. The gievance ofthe petitioner in this writ petition is thai the respondents have not regularised his service till date, 'Ihe petitioner has filed a representation to the Collector, Rajnandgaon in this regard'and that has not been decided. The petitioner made several requests; for regularization ofhis services in oral and written form, but the authérity is not ready to take any posrtive action He had filed a representation to the Assrstant Commisswner 'Iribal Development Rajnandvaon on 16.08.2005. -2 In this petition, flied under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the reiief sought for by the petitioner is as under: “That. this Hon’ble Court kindly be pleased to direct the jespondemb to aegalanzed the Sefvme of the pet1tloner and also prov1de regutar pay scale to the pet1t1m1e1 With anears same» 1998 or ehei 1998 makmo reculanzanon v r In my opinion, the responsible respondents ought to have considered the gn'evanee ofthe petitioner made in his representation. Since that has no been done, a direction requires to be issued to the respondents. Thewrit petition is disposed of. Without expressing any opinion on merit, the competent authority before Whom the representation of the petitioner is pending consideration, may decide in accordance with iaw, on its own merits, within a period of six months nom the date of receipt I of a copy ofthis order. Ordered accordingly. Sd/. Sdtlsh K Agnlhouq t