IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 17121 of 2002 [O&M]. Date of Decision: 21st May, 2009. Raj Kumar Mawa & Ors. ....Petitioners through Mr. K.K.Saini, Advocate Versus U.T.Administration & Ors. Respondents through Mr. K.K.Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL) The petitioners seek quashing of the order dated 24.1.2002 whereby their case for allotment of Booths meant for Kashmiri Migrants, has been rejected. They seek a consequential direction for allotment of Booths to them. The petitioners claim themselves to be the migrants from Kashmir Valley who had to leave their original place on account of the circumstances beyond their control. It is their case that they fulfill all the eligibility conditions as prescribed under Rule 5-A of the Allotment/Transfer of Built-up Booths in any Sector on Lease/Hire Purchase Basis in Chandigarh Rules, 1991. The petitioners have now moved an application that their claim stands squarely answered in their favour by this Court vide judgment dated 4th March, 2009 passed in CWP No. 8127 of 2002 [Agya Ram & Ors. V U.T.Administration & Ors.]. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly agrees that the petitioner's claim shall be examined and if found eligible as per the Rules to the satisfaction of the Competent Authority, the consequential action shall be taken. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to re-consider the petitioner's claim in terms of the directions contained in Agya Ram's case and dispose of the same as early as possible but not later than three months from the date a certified copy of this order is received. Disposed of. May 21, 2009. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE