IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Family Court Appeal No. 135 of 2006 with Civil Application No. 230 of 2006 and Civil Application No.284 of 2006 and Civil Application No.294 of 2006 and Civil Application No.295 of 2006 Sajid Rasoolbhai Noor Mohammed Modan ..Appellant vs. Mrs.Shabana Sajid Modan ..Respondent Smt.Alka Juleshi i/b Shri P.M.Havnur for appellant. Shri N.P.Deshpande for respondent. CORAM: S.B.MHASE AND CORAM: S.B.MHASE AND CORAM: S.B.MHASE AND Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI JJ. Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI JJ. Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI JJ. 10th January, 2007 10th January, 2007 10th January, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The parties are present in Court along with their Advocates. The Advocates identify the parties. The parties have also identified each other. 2. The parties have submitted the consent terms settling the dispute in between the parties. The said consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. We have asked the parties as to whether the consent terms were explained to them and as to whether they understand it. The parties admitted before us that their Advocates have explained the terms in the consent terms to them inthe language which they understand and that they have accepted and signed the consent terms being fully aware of the contents of the consent terms. We also find that the parties have voluntarily entered into the consent terms and,therefore, we accept the consent terms. 3. We direct the parties to discharge the obligations which have been incorporated in the consent terms respectively inter se between them. The parties and all other authorities whomsoevere it is concerned are also directed to rely upon and act upon the authenticated copy of the consent terms at X. 4. In view of the above order in the appeal civil applications do not survive and hence all the civil applications are disposed of. (Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI J.) (S.B.MHASE J.) (Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI J.) (S.B.MHASE J.) (Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI J.) (S.B.MHASE J.)