Crl. Rev. No.2665 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Rev. No.2665 of 2011. Date of decision: November 08, 2011. Sunil Kumar .. Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI * * * PRESENT Mr.Naveen Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. * * * M.M.S.BEDI, J (ORAL). Petitioner seeks the quashing of charges under Section 376 IPC, contending that no offence is made out. After hearing the counsel for the petitioner, I am of the considered opinion that it has to be appreciated in context to the evidence produced before the Court below whether the act of the petitioner would fall under Section 376 IPC, if seen, in context to the definition of rape given under Section 375 clause fourthly of IPC. Disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to raise all the pleas before the trial Court at opportune time. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE November 08, 2011. rka ...1