6&9 w HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BELASPUR WA SB. : EON’BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI J. WRIT PETITION (Q No. 1490 £2007 l’ETITIQNER Dr KGPandev Q/o Qhn (‘ PPandev ‘ Age 66 Years R/o “Pandey Dendal Chmc Tatvapara G Road Ramur r 4 (0.6.) VERSUS Municipal Corporation Through Commissioner, Raipur (C.G.) 2. State of Chhamsgarh Through— Coilectcr Ralpur (C G) RES?0NEENTS Presem Smt Kmm Mayee Nayak, Advocate w1th ghn C R Sahu Advocate for the petltloner Sbn Sanjay K Aarawal Advocate With Shn Kashlf Shakeel Advocate for respondent No 1 j Shrl V V S Moorthv Deputy Advocate General wfh Shn UtLareh Verma Depmy Government Advocate for reepondent No 2 ' ORDER (Passed on 29m of March, 2007} 1. In this petitioo, the facts and questions of law involved are the same as that of in WE, ((3.) No, 257 of2007 (Deepak Kumar Sluivastava Vs. Muoieioal Comoration Raiour & another) which baa been dispoaed of toda“ 1 e 29 of March 7007 Toio pe Jim s‘rands dispose'i of 1o the same terms and conditions, 2, No order as to costs, Sd/- i Satish K Agmh°m g Judge J lg l l l Amit g