HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.609 of 2011 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order, dated 04.02.2011, passed by the III Additional District Judge, Guntur, dismissing the application in I.A.No.1124 of 2010 in A.S.No.301 of 2010, which was filed under Section 45 of Indian Evidence Act praying the Court to send the suit promissory note-Ex.A-1 to Government Handwriting Expert at Pune for the purpose of examination of the document as to the age of the paper, the year of the revenue stamp and age of writing on the promissory note and the age of ink and his signature. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner-defendant and perused the relevant material papers on record. The said application was filed by the defendant. From the record, it appears that earlier I.A.No.1052 of 2009 was filed by the defendant before the trial Court to send the pronote-Ex.A-1 to Hand Writing Expert and the same was allowed, and pursuant thereto, the said document was sent to the expert who examined the same and endorsed that it is not possible to ascertain the age of the paper, ink and writing. Subsequently, the defendant filed another application being I.A.No.589 of 2010 for the very same relief, but it was dismissed. Again, the defendant resorted to file the present application before the lower appellate Court seeking the very same relief, which was rejected. The opinion of the Hand writing Expert is not the sole criteria for determining the genuinity or otherwise of the document nor it is the final decision, which shall be mandatorily relied upon by the Court while adjudicating the matter. The Court on its own accord, judiciously, can ascertain the genuiness of the said document. That apart, as rightly observed by the Court below in the impugned order, when the second application filed by the defendant seeking to send the document to Hand Writing Expert was dismissed and the order became final, the petitioner is not entitled to file another application for the very same relief and the same is not maintainable. For the foregoing reasons, the Civil Revision Petition is liable to be dismissed and is accordingly dismissed, at the stage of admission. However, there shall be no order as to costs. _____________________________ JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED​ 25th February 2011 DR