IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6734 of 2007 Date of decision:05.05.2009 Vijay Walia ...Petitioner versus Sudershan Singh Deol ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KANNAN Present: Mr.V.K.Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.G.S.Punia, Advocate, for the respondent. ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? K.Kannan, J.(Oral) 1. Counsel for both the parties have stated that the landlord has taken possession of the premises and the revision need not to be further prosecuted. 2. The Civil Revision is, therefore, dismissed as having become infructuous. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 05.05.2009 sanjeev