IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11707 of 2010 SHAMIM AKHTAR & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 4.8.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It is alleged that the informant son was killed by some unknown person. During investigation the complicity of the petitioner figured but the S.P. initially found insufficient evidence with regard to the petitioner and directed for further probe into the matter. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner with regard to delayed filing of the present anticipatory bail application that in the quashing application the stay was operating since 21.10.2005 till 24.2.2010. It is submitted by learned counsel for the State that the case diary only reflects the progress up till 11.7.2009. Considering the fact that F.I.R. was lodged 2 against unknown and still the investigation is continuing and in view of the opinion of the S.P. as contained in Annexure-2, let the petitioners, namely, (1) Shamim Akhtar (2) Gulraj Akhtar in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail till the conclusion of investigation on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah in connection with Bettiah (T) P.S. Case No.180 of 2005, (G.R. No. 1150 of 2005), subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Anand Kr. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)