IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN MONDAY, THE 23RD MAY 2011 / 2ND JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 13306 of 2011(K) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ THULASI, AGED 55 YEARS, W/O. MANIYAN CHETTIAR, AMBIKA NIVAS, MANAKAD PERINTHANI, TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.NOBLE MATHEW SRI.P.N.SUMODU RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOLLAM EAST POLICE STATION.PIN-691 001 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOLLAM EAST POLICE STATION.PIN-691 001 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, KOLLAM. 4. MARIYAPPAN @ KUMAR, AGED 49 YEARS, S/O. NATARAJA PILLAI, AMMANKOVIL PURAYIDOM, THAMARAKULAM, KOLLAM.PIN-690 530 5. SIVAN, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O. NATARAJA PILLAI, AMMANKOVIL PURAYIDOM, THAMARAKULAM, KOLLAM.PIN-690 530 6. SIVADASAN, AGED 60 YEARS, S/O. KOLLAPPA PILLAI, AMMANKOVIL PURAYIDOM, THAMARAKULAM, KOLLAM.PIN-690 530 7. MURUGAN, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. NATARAJA PILLAI, NNR COMPOUND, THAMARAKULAM, KOLLAM.PIN-690 530 sts 2/- WP(C)NO.13306/2011 8. VIPIN MOHAN UNNITHAN, RECEIVER, MARIAMMANCOVIL,THAMARAKULAM, KOLLAM.PIN-690 530 9. S. SREERAM, SECRETARY, SREE MUTHU MARIAMMANCOVIL, THAMARAKULAM, KOLLAM. RESIDING AT KESAVA NIVAS, M.G.STREET, THAMARAKULAM, KOLLAM.PIN-690 530 10. R.RADHAKRISHNAN, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, PRESIDENT, SREE MUTHU MARIAMMAN COVIL,THAMARAKULAM, KOLLAM. RESIDING AT MECHERY MANA, VIDHYA NAGAR, KOTTAKKAKAM WARD CUTCHERY, KOLLAM.PIN-690 530 R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K. VIPINDAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts R. BASANT & K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 13306 of 2011-K ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of May, 2011 JUDGMENT Basant,J. This petition filed on 9/5/2011 before the Vacation Bench has come up for hearing. There is no representation for the petitioner. We have gone through the petition. It is evident that the petitioner is not now interested in the prosecution of this petition after re-opening of courts, whereupon she shall be at liberty to take necessary steps for execution of the decree which she has secured. This writ petition is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- R. BASANT (Judge) Sd/- K. SURENDRA MOHAN (Judge) Nan/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge