IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9530 of 2006 TULSI YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02. 19.11.2010 In view of clear and categorical denial by the respondents about the petitioner ever being appointed on the post of Chaukidar, no order can be given in favour of the petitioner to pay him salary from the year 1992, which is the year when petitioner alleges that he was appointed and has been working as such. Dispute of the kind cannot be decided or adjudicated with the material which is available on record and in absence of unimpeachable evidence of appointment as such on the post. If the petitioner has other remedy under law, he may pursue. The writ application is dismissed with liberty as above. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)