AO No. 34 of 2009 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. This appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 has been filed by the appellant against the judgment and award dated 27.08.2008 passed by Workmen Compensation Commissioner in W.C. Case No. 7 of 2006-07, Smt. Mangali Devi Vs Suresh Chandra Mishra & another. Heard Sri T.A. Khan, learned counsel for the appellant and perused the record. After hearing learned counsel for the appellant at great length, I have gone though the impugned judgment and award. The learned Workmen Compensation Commissioner in the absence of any cogent and reliable evidence available on record considered the monthly wages @ 100/- per day and awarded the amount of compensation as per provision of Schedule according to schedule 4(a) of the Workmen Compensation’s Act, 1923. I also do not find any substantial question of law in this case. I do not find any calculation error in the impugned judgment and award. The amount awarded by the learned Workmen Compensation Commissioner is just and proper. I do not find any infirmity, illegality or incorrectness in the impugned judgment and award. The appeal lacks merit and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed in- limine. (B.C.K., J.) 17.07.2009 ASWAL