IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.3411 of 2008 Date of decision: 06.11.2008 Joginder Singh .... Appellant versus Gurmukh Singh & others .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present: Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate for the appellant. **** AJAY TEWARI, J. This appeal will also decide RSA No.3412 of 2008. This appeal has been filed against the concurrent judgments of the Courts below decreeing the suit of the respondent for possession of land in dispute and for declaration that the decree dated 05.10.1991 obtained by the appellant against the respondent No.1 is null and void having been obtained by fraud and with further declaration that subsequent alienation made by the appellant on the basis of the said illegal judgment are also null and void and do not effect the rights of the respondents. Both the Courts concurrently found that the decree dated 05.10.1991 was fraudulent; that in fact the respondent No.1 had appeared in the Court to admit the claim of the appellant and that in fact the respondent No.1 was not found present in India at that time. Learned counsel for the appellant has not been able to show me that these findings of facts are either perverse or can be held not to raise from the actual record before both the Courts below. Consequently, I hold RSA No.3411 of 2008 -2- that the questions of law proposed in the present appeal do not arise and thereby dismiss the appeal. No costs. November 6, 2008 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE