IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 548 of 2006 (M/B) 1. Smt. Minashi W/o Vikas, presently R/o Shakti Vihar, near Railway Godam, Roorkee, P.S. Gangnahar, Roorkee, District Haridwar. 2. Vikas S/o Sri Amar Singh, R/o Shakti Vihar near Railway Godam, Roorkee, P.S. Gangnahar, Roorkee, District Haridwar. Permanent R/o 157 (F) Railway Colony, Jagadari Workshop, District Yamunanagar, Haryana. ........... Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal. 2. S.S.P. Haridwar. 3. S.H.O., P.S. Gangnahar, Roorkee, Haridwar. 4. Sri Surendra Kumar S/o Sri Rati Ram, R/o House No. 465 Hanuman Colony, Roorkee, P.S. Gangnahar, Roorkee, Haridwar. .......... Respondents None for the petitioners. Mr. H.C. Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for respondents Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 4. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. RAJESH GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Petitioners’ counsel absent. Mr. H.C. Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for respondents Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 4. 2. As there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, we are left with no other option but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. 2 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. With the above, order, CLMA No. 5491 of 2006 also stands dismissed for want of prosecution. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 04.09.2006 04.09.2006 G