IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA No.2258 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 04.07.2011 Nasirudeen ... Appellant versus Haryana Wakf Board, Ambala Cantt. ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present : None for the appellant. Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the respondent. **** Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Counsel for the appellant is not present in Court. Even on the last date of hearing, no one was present on behalf of the appellant. Counsel for the respondent has brought to the notice of this Court the provisions of Section 83 (7) & (9) of The Wakf Act, 1995, which reads thus: “83.Constitution of Tribunals, etc.- (1) to (6) x x x x x x x x (7) The decision of the Tribunal shall be final and binding upon the parties to the application and it shall have the force of a decree made by a Civil Court. (8) x x x x x x x x x (9) No appeal shall lie against any decision or order whether interim or otherwise, given or made by the Tribunal: Provided that a High Court may, on its own motion or on the application of the Board or any person aggrieved, call for and examine the records relating to any dispute, question or other matter which has been RFA No.2258 of 2010 (O&M) -2- determined by the Tribunal for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the correctness, legality or propriety of such determination and may confirm, reverse or modify such determination or pass such other order as it may think fit.” In view of the aforesaid provisions, this appeal is not maintainable. Since no one is present on behalf of the appellant, this appeal is dismissed in default. July 04, 2011 (Rakesh Kumar Garg) sonia Judge