5- ^^ THE HIGH COIIRT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION N0, ^^3> QF 2003 PEimONER : ^iC €• ^ .% .'^^ ^'s^~ t-^< 0/ ^ RESPONDENTS: DevM Nandan Shani^ S/o sibout 42 yeacs, occupation Sub En^near, I^riyojna Knysinyayssi Ikai, Bradhaiungntd Gram S^isk Yojiia, Ilstt IXffg, 'R/o C/o Kmlash Chmd Dubey (Advocate), In iront of Sumit B^futy Rarlour, K^aridili, EXstt. Duig(C.G) VER8US (1) Umon of laidia, Ihroii^i 1he sea-elmy Kanirik Riblic Cowplss. & Ptesion Nistealay and Karmik & Traimng Depgrtn^it, Ne%r Delhi. (2) State of K^Mhya Pr^iesh, throu^i fhe Secretei3-r Wster Resourc^ D^>artaiffit, V^labh Hiawan aio^AMP. (3) State of ailiattisggrh liirois^i &e Secretary W^ser Resourc^ / DEpaB-tment D.K.S. aianwan Rfflpur(C.a) (4) ConBiiissiono- Pandieyat & Gramin Vlkas Depaa-tmait REttpiar (5) DtrectDr, Ksairstk: aid R'iashilcsfaan Vlbli^ NewDe3M. ^' WRIT PETITION U/A 226/227 OF THE CONSITITUTION OF INDIA "I HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Siagle Bench: Hon^le Mr. Justice Satish K. Agaihotri. Writ Petition No. 2903 of 2003 Petitioner Devki Naadaa Shaniia Versus Respondents Unioii of India & ofhers Shri Suml Sahu, Advocate for ftie petitioner, Shri S. K. Beriwal, Staadiag counsel with Smt. B. Maithy, Advocate for Respondent No. 1 and 5, Shri Paakaj Shrivastava, Panel lawyer for respondents No. 3 and 4. None for the Respondenf No. 2, ORAL ORDER ( 16th Febmaiy, 2006) The foUowmg order of the Court was passed by Satish K. Agaihotri, J. 1. Leamed counsel appesjing for the petitioner snbmits that fhe petitioner, who is workiag on fhe post of Sub Eiigineer m Pariyojna Kriyaavayan Ikai, Pradhanmantri Gram Sadak Yojna, ia District- Durg of Water Resoiirces Department, is a permaaeut resident of District- Paana m fhe State of Madhya Pradesh. The petitioner has been allocated to tiie State of Chhattisgarh aiid he waxits his reallocation to the State of Madhya Pradesh, Leamed counsel for the petitioner, on mstruction, submits fhat tiie petitioner be graiited Uberty to inake a representatlon to fhe respoiidents for redressal of his grievaaces. Learaed counsel appearing for the respoiidents have no objection to the said szibmission. 2, In view offhe foregoing, the petition staads disposed offinally, with Uberty to the petitioner to make an. appropriate representation to fhe respondents/aufhorities coiiceraed, wifhia a period of two weeks froni today, and fhe respondents/authorities are directed to consider aad decide the same, in aii objective nianner, ia accordance wifli law, wifhin. a period of eight weeks fironi the date of receipt of fhe rcprcsenlRtion, ifaiiy. Certified copy, as per Rules. | Thakur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge