CR No.116 of 2009 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.116 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.2.2009 Kulwant Singh and another ......Petitioners Versus Dalip Singh and others ......Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Ms. Sumanjit Kaur, Advocate for the petitioners. * * * Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. This revision petition has been filed by the plaintiffs challenging the orders dated 6.10.2007 and 19.9.2008 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Ludhiana and the Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Ludhiana, respectively vide which a direction has been given to the parties to the suit to maintain status quo with regard to alienation of the suit land during the pendency of the suit and the prayer of the petitioners with regard to restraining the defendants from taking forcible possession over the suit property, has been rejected. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the petitioners were put into possession of the suit property by the defendant-respondents on the basis of agreement to sell dated 29.10.2004 and this fact of possession stands corroborated from the recital in the aforesaid agreement to sell and the statements of the witnesses and therefore, the Courts below have erred in law while not granting the ad interim injunction protecting the possession of the petitioners. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners. CR No.116 of 2009 (O&M) 2 I find no merit in this petition. It is the pleaded case of the petitioners themselves that they are seeking possession over the suit property by way of specific agreement to sell in question. Once that is so, the relief sought is misconceived. I find no fault with the impugned order. Dismissed. February 26, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE