Crl. Misc.No.M-27936 of 2010 # 1# IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc.No.M-27936 of 2010 Date of Decision:-02.11.2010 Sukhjinder Singh. ......Petitioner. Versus State of Punjab. ......Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH. Present:- Mr. Baljinder Singh Sra, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, AAG Punjab. *** JASWANT SINGH, J (ORAL) Prayer is under Section 438 Cr.PC for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.87 dated 1.8.2010(P1) under Sections 324, 326, 506 and 34 Indian Penal Code registered with Police Station Goindwal Sahib, District Taran Taran. As per allegations in the FIR dated 1.8.2010(P1) petitioner- Sukhjinder Singh @ Goldy armed with a datar along with his co- accused Gurdev Singh(son of the petitioner) armed with a datar and Juj Singh armed with kirpan on raising of lalkara by co-accused Kanwar Singh inflicted injury on the right cheek of the complainant Surjeet Crl. Misc.No.M-27936 of 2010 # 2# while his co-accused inflicted injury on his right eye brow and middle part of the right cheek. Learned counsel submits that on 28.6.2010 in the morning one Balwant Singh and his son Gurlal Singh and other accomplices had attacked the house of the petitioner and had inflicted injuries on the person of the son of the petitioner. With regard to the said incident, FIR dated 30.6.2010 (P2) under Sections 452, 326, 324, 323, 148 and 149 IPC was lodged. The alleged occurrence in present FIR(P1) is stated to have taken place while Surjit Singh-complainant is stated to have gone to hospital to visit his relative Balwant Singh, who had created superficial injuries and had got himself admitted in the hospital to create a defence in FIR(P2). It is submitted that the allegations in the FIR(P1) have been exaggerated besides being a counter blast to FIR (P2). Learned State Counsel on instructions from SI Sushil Kumar points out that soon after the alleged occurrence Surjit Singh was examined in the Civil Hospital and three incised wounds were found on his person. The injury no.1 alleged to be inflicted bythe petitioner was opined to be grevious in nature. In view of the nature and gravity of offence no case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. Dismissed. ( JASWANT SINGH ) JUDGE 02nd November,2010 Vinay