.^" Cc^Z^- ^*'''.,^" ..••''' ^"'...••-" JN THE HIGH OOUKF OF JUDICATHRE AT BIIASP0E(C.G. ) W&IT PETITION (S) N0. S"^^g OS- 2006 PETI'^IpNER_ s " Hari om Gupta,son of late sri f -.••*°*i.PP R.N*Gupta,aged about 59 years, .^..••••^•^ os'Y-'€(-'$•..••'' occupat.i.on: s.D.O. (po-Lice) ,..-tlgp?^" Mahasamund,District-MahasaBiund(C.G.) VE RS U S RESPONQENTS S ^l. State of Chhattisgarh througb secretary (Home) D.K.s.ghawan,Raipur,(C»S.) / 1. Inspector General of police Ralpur Reglon.Ralpar. / 3. saperintendent of Police , Mahas amund.Distr ict-Mahas amand( C. G.) State o£ Chhattlsgarh, Through Deputy secretary(Home) Raipur,(C.G.) •y / WfiIT PETxTION UNDER ARTICU; 226/227 OP THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 9 •^ li~f II >r'-3.1 •1-.V" XI-HC-22 3)1^T?>T f^-iwsn^r sbHitiHfN' SbHltl •^ M padma 3^'siraicPT, ®T(i<i'i<o,l°icii«y sn^r imcti shHi«»> . lA) P ^>.^.^ ^.W..)....\-.^.......r^ 2fl0^ R(l«& sn^T ^dTW (ifef 18.10.2006 Shri Sunil Sahu,counsel| Shri Utkarsh Verma, &y Heard on admission and 1)1 Vide State (Sovernment ( was working as by.Supdt o| temporarily til] furl+ier orde subsequently vide order dated Supdt of Police at Raipur. ^ recalled. Learned counsel for th^ malafide on the part of petitioner, in compliance to ear post or not. In the absence of any m^ order impugned does not cal petition stands dismissed sui In the light of above of. »tii<ifi'i<fl-iKiii;iTfftec^<Riw;i< ^srf^iTa'n^r For the petitioner. SA for the State/respondents. n M.(W.)P.No.4315/2006. )rder dated 18.09.2006, petitioner who Police at Raipur was transfer-red as 5&0 (P) to Mahasamund. But, 26.09.2006, he was again posted as &y 'irtually, the earlier order has been petitioner failed to demonstrate any 6overn|ment, even failed to show whether the ier order, took over charge of the new 'lafide on the part of (Sovernment, the -or any interference. Therefors, the immjirily. orc^sr, IA No.10191/2006 stands disposed Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge (^ywt)