HON’BLE SRI JUSITCE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITON No.7545 of 2006 Dated 9-10-2006 Between: K. Nellakanta Reddy, Ananthapur. ……Petitioner and The Superintendent of Police, Ananthapur and others. …..Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSITCE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITON No.7545 of 2006 ORDER: Petitioner’s grievance is that the complaint dated 27- 3-2006 conveying information as to the commission of a cognizable offence has not been registered by the 1st respondent. In respect of such grievance, the petitioner has an effective alternative statutory remedy by way of preferring a complaint under Section 190 Cr.P.C. In view of the decision of the Supreme Court reported in Hari Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh[1], the petitioner must prosecute the available statutory remedy. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to prosecute the available remedy. ________________ 9th October 2006 mrb [1] 2006 (5) Supreme 513