IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16148 of 2009 PINTU @ MINTU, SON OF ATABUL, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAHMATPUR LAL BAG, P.S. NATHNAGAR (MADHUSUDANPUR) DISTRICT BHAGALPUR. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.5.2009. N.H./ The petitioner is in custody since 2.11.2008 in relation to Nathnagar (Madhusudanpur) P.S. Case No.285 of 2008 instituted under section 307 and other sections of I.P.C. read with explosive Substance Act. From the allegations, it appears that petitioner had hurled bomb on the informant, injured six persons in all allegedly while demanding rangdari. Mr. Krishna Mohan,learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the injuries on the persons are simple in nature. He further submits that there are pre-existing serious cases as between the parties all persons who are witnesses to the occurrence as per the information are accused in cases already instituted by the petitioner or petitioner’s mother. Petitioner has been falsely implicated. In my view, the allegations being specific against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. However, on commitment of the case, petitioner may renew his prayer for bail before the trial court itself who would consider the same without being prejudiced by this order as also keeping in view the several cases in which the informant and other witnesses of informant have been made accused at the instance of the petitioner or his mother. This application is, accordingly, dismissed. ( Navaniti Prasad Singh ) - 2 -