IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 10TH JULY 2008 / 19TH ASHADHA 1930 W.P(C).No. 19938 of 2008(W) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ---------------- DR.S.M.PILLAI, NEURO SURGEON AND DIRECTOR, COCHIN SPINE HOSPITAL SHIVALAYAM(NO.63/1395), SRM ROAD, OPP.TO SHASTHA TEMPLE, ROAD CONNECTING SRM ROAD TO THE 2ND PLATFORM NORTH RAILWAY STATION, ERNAKULAM BY ADV. DR.V.N.SANKARJEE RESPONDENTS: -------------------- 1. SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF KOCHI, ERNAKULAM 2. TOWN PLANNING OFFICER, CORPORATION OF KOCHI, ERNAKULAM 3. MURALI, R/A THE ADJACENT EASTERN HOUSE OF DR.S.M.PILLAI.SRM ROAD OPP.SHASTHA TEMPLE, ROAD CONNECTING SRM ROAD TO THE 2ND PLATFORM NORTH RAILWAY STATION, ERNAKULAM BY ADV. SRI. S. RAMESH BABU, SC FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/07/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 19938 OF 2008 - W = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 10th day of July 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that on the allegation that the 3rd respondent had made certain unauthorized constructions he had made Exts. P1 and P2 complaints to the respondent Corporation. However, it is seen that Exts. P1 and P2 are not addressed to the Secretary of the Corporation, the proper authority to deal with a complaint in the nature of the one raised by the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing that if the petitioner files an appropriate complaint before the 1st respondent, on receipt thereof, the 1st respondent shall take appropriate action thereon. However any order on such application shall be passed only with notice to the 3rd respondent. 2. It is clarified that this Court has not dealt with the merits of the complaint raised by the petitioner and it is entirely for the 1st respondent to deal with the complaint on its merits. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-