IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 6TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 15TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 24328 of 2011(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- C.BEERANKUTTY, S/O.ABDU HAJI, CHOONDAPARAMBIL HOUSE, PURANG AMSOM DESOM, PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION (M) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. THE HEADMITRESS, GOVERNMENT H.S.S., POST GRAMAM, VELIYAMCODE, MALAPPURAM DISTICT, PIN 679579. 3. THE MANAGER, MALABAR REGIONAL CO-OPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS' UNION LTD., PALAKKAD DIARY, KALLEPPULLY POST, PALAKKAD-678 005. SR GP SMT.M.J. RAJASHREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 24328 of 2011 APPENDIX EXHIBITS EXT.P1- TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.2297/05/G EDN DATED 3.6.05 EXT.P2- TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 13.12.10 EXT.P3- TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION OF THE PTA EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE DATED 19.1.11 EXT.P4- TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION SENT BY THE 2ND RESPNDENT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 22.1.11 EXT.P5- TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION OF THE VELIYAMCODE GRAMA PANCHAYAT DATED 27.4.11 EXT.P6- TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE VELIYAMCODE GRAMA PANCHAYAT DATED 17.6.11 FOR PAYMENT OF BUILDING TAX EXT.P7- TRUE COPY OF THE OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATE DATED 17.6.11 ISSUED BY THE VELIYAMCODE GRAMA PANCHAYAT EXT.P8- TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 1.6.11 EXT.P9- TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 20.8.2011 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT (True copy) P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).24328/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 6th day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT According to the petitioner, pursuant to Ext.P1 and the decision taken by the PTA, he has already set up a Milma Booth within the premises of Govt. H.S.S., Veliyamcode, Malappuram District. Second respondent is the Headmistress of the said School. It is stated that in spite of all that, the second respondent has not permitted the petitioner to start the Milma Booth. Complaining of the above, petitioner has already filed Ext.P9 representation before the second respondent and orders thereon have not been passed so far. It is with this grievance the writ petition is filed. Taking note of the grievance of the petitioner regarding the pendency of Ext.P9 representation, I direct the second respondent to consider the same and pass orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs