IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.19598 of 2011 Date of decision : 19.10.2011 Ram Chander ....Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Rajesh Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent No.4 has been erroneously granted the benefit to which he was not entitled to as per the instructions which envisage the grant of higher pay scale to the person having higher qualification prior to 1990 whereas respondent No.4 acquired the same in 1993. On due consideration of the matter, I am of the opinion that the instant petition is misconceived. The right of the petitioner has not been encroached upon by virtue of the order passed in favour of respondent No.4 and he has not been adversely affected in any manner. In service jurisprudence except for the writ of quo-warranto, which can be filed in the eventuality of a person having obtained irregular appointment to the detriment of the person, who so complains of it, the grievance of the kind in the petition raised C.W.P.No.19598 of 2011 -2- cannot be made. If at all anybody was aggrieved, it could have been the State and they are at liberty to look into the matter. No ground to interfere. Dismissed. 19.10.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss