IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21366 of 2010 SATTO MAHTO, SON OF RAMDEO MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 30.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 25(1-B) and 26 of the Arms Act. Considering that for misuse of privilege of bail for a period of about four years, the petitioner has remained in custody since 1.6.2009 and it has been categorically submitted that in the intervening he has not indulged in any anti social activity, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bhagalpur, in Nath Nagar P.S. Case No. 09 of 1998 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)