THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI C.R.P.No. 5267 of 2009 ORAL ORDER: The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the orders of the learned Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in I.A.No.2166 of 2008 in A.S.S.R.No. 7930 of 2008, dated 17.7.2009. Brief facts of the revision are that: Petitioner herein is the appellant and respondent herein is the respondent before the learned trial Court. Before the learned trial Court, the petitioner herein has preferred I.A.No. 2166 of 2008 to condone the delay of 875 days in preferring the appeal. After hearing both the sides, the learned trial Court has dismissed the said petition. Challenging the said order, the present Civil Revision Petition has been preferred by the petitioner. Heard the learned Counsel. As can be seen from the order under revision that the suit was decreed on 7.12.2005. It is the contention of the petitioner- appellant that he was suffering from Hyper Tension, low back pain since 15.12.2005 and he was advised to take bed rest. It is the contention of the petitioner that he was under the treatment of doctor from 15.12.2005 to 31.3.2008 and he was advised to take bed rest and therefore he could not prefer the appeal in time. Record shows that the petitioner has applied for certified copy of the judgment and decree on 31.3.2008 and obtained on 3.4.2008, but the present petition was filed on 30.4.2008. The order of the court below is crystal clear that the petitioner could not explain the reasons for the abnormal delay in preferring the appeal. Under these circumstances, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. _______________________ T. MEENA KUMARI, J 12.11.2009 CHV