IN THE HIGH GOURT OF JUDICATTOtE AT BHASPUB^C.G.) PETITIONER //. :<^f" -.as' >^" ^.<3;aei7-' .^f <<^/ VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. W.f.NQ,.J^.S5,,/2003 BateshwarDayalSmgh NOiuA<^^J' Agedabout38 years i/0 Shri Parshurarn Singh Narwaniya ,^^ Sub Engineer . ^ub Divisional OfBcer,Hasdeo Sub Miaor Sub Divisional No. 3 NandeIiBhata, Sakti Department ofWater Resources District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.); State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department ofWater Resources D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Union oflndia TKrough Director •epartment ofPersonnel and Training Ministiy ofPersonnel, Public Grievances and Pension Govenunent oflndia Room no. 312, LokNayakBhawan .3rdFlooi^KhanMarket (State Reorganisation Cell) KhanMarket, NewDelhi- 110003 State ofMadhya Pradesh Through The Piincipal Secretary DepaTtmentofWaterlResourees • Mantralaya.lVaUabii'Bhawan ]' Bhopal(M.P.) ^- [ii :aa flBJ' H^ ! 1".!. i:ll l;iii U'iii ^•1^' ilk ItJBffiEj WRIT PETmON UNBER ARTICLES 226/227 OF TSE CQNSTITUTION OF ~s^: .^... WDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WMTS^OB'^CERTIORA.RI ANb MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR FURTHER SCTTABLE WKITS AND DIRECTIONS : ilt XJ-RC-2Z an^r^i fcli.t SS^f, Sti'RRl •Sft^ T»?-'IWIrt'1), a>fllwis, l«(cliwy 3n^9r 'V^K U-f-l'o°- 15" *<11CTI ^^|q,------—•••••-•••-•—g^ 2003 fa'b^iiT" 31I^!I TOttW ^lfOT 11.7.2003 cftt<rf(yi4h 'In3^ff ^ fil^t <^*I^.R •^T SlPaq 3U^I Petitioner(s) by Shri San^eep Dubey, advocate. State by Shri Rajesh Pan^ley, Government Advocate. Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Addl. Central:Govemment Standing Counsel for the Union of India^ Shri R.S. Jha, Deputy Ac^vocate General for the State of M.P. Hcard finally. Counsel for the petitio^iers submits that ttiey faave su supplied the copies of the pejtitions with Annexures to the couiisel for tlie Slate of C.G./^-.P. aiid llie Uiiiou ol Iiidia. (:opy be supplied and the However, one extra acknowlcdgcnacnts thcrcof bc Counsel for tlie petitione ibtaiacd. r(s) submits that these matters are squarely covered by th^ decision of fhis Court ui ^^.N0.2353/2002 (MaIiesKKjymaFTiwariys.^ and ofhers) decided on 28.-4.^003. They pr^ that smular orders laay be passed in thes^ cases also as the^ are simUar. Kls stated that tyeSstaE^menlt is made iatyfli&BaT after due :B8»t f» ^i^s%". ^'sSiWW'.f submiitlfiaaf'ftie pctitioners iiav^apgrbactije^^JBI^lv an^ i^ is notpossible to decide the [^^faA i~?1: j IJli Ai-HC-22 an^rqn R-t SDSSI 5n^icr> •af^ "3^ -<11<11<11, »flly'IS,(qCTI+iy 3ff^?T TfsTSR *n<wii •^tf^—-——-——------^^ ^Q^ I^^T" representations by the CentTal schedule as. raentioned in W 28.4.22003. Counsel for the p| to dispute this. They, howeve cs^c»<<T^*i c?l*'9 Fs^ <f^iR^K ^ 3iP(iE[ an^T GoveiTiment wit.hin t.he time .P.No.2353/2003 decided on stitioners are not m a posltion r, pray that their matters be considered. Accordingly, relying on tljie statement made by counsel for the parties on the instru^tions received, as stated, the petitions are disposed of withj fhe observations as made in W.P.No.2353/02 (SSahesh S^tmar Tiwari Vs. Union of Indiet. cmd others) decieted |>n 28.4.2003 subject to the modification that the petition^rs, if so desire, may make a detailed representation raista^theu- grievancesalongwith the docuiueut.s willuii tcu daysffroiu loday Lo tiie Ceiilial Govemmfint addressed to tthe OovemmeTit of Tndia, Begartment ofPersonnel and '^raining, Ministry ofPersonnel, PubUc" Qrievances and Pensl((ns, Loknayak Btlawan, Khan Market, New^ Delhi (State Reofgaiiisation CeU). Said copy of the representationjcluly^iippc^'ted by all relevairt dociiments l^sa]so;;seiTed onl^liKicxmcebied Departinent ;S^i|SS®^oytai^^^B'l^^aelaiowledggmef^ both'the' '"SS^SW'^i^' : ;..:%IS|:IN®S:;'; jo the CentraI'QCTremment with ||^s|nay:fbr%a|^^same. 1; tIielE-rGoriim.ents^a]B|||JBiifi reqi4stte infbrmatton and complete ^ details in order t& enablc thc of both the Central Ooverrunent to decide [^^fe^ ts,s^ XI-HC-22 "3'^ --^ww<<, a^l+ris, r«<ciiyy ^3. SII^f^iT M an^r WRW^BSd 3TI^?T "CR^; *<11CTI g,^|q,—-—--------"~g^ ^g^ fe?^' sn^i T^IIW: ~(^t -^ - betln Govemtnents mfcde r.he representation. Tt. is open seek such ftirther informatioi and on .such reqi.usition Govemiiient; fhe State such representation bein^ may consider and decide the appropriate orders as deemed withlaw. In view of the above, disposed of. Certi&ed copy as per rulc 'bWSrl'i'l-l TWTCTf^ fetA tfSn^H ^aiPOTCT^r to t.he CRntra] Ciovemmeiit: ro from the State Govemraents (Ing made from the Cenrral wffl suppty the sam.e. On ;, the Central QovenTinent ^ame expeditiously by passin^ fit and proper, in accordance t.W.P and I.A., if any, stand s. Sd/-; Eakliruddin Judge ^ [T^ ^afji