1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail Appli. No.574/2008 (Ahmed vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : February 19, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Ramesh Purohit, for the petitioner. Mr.J.P.S.Choudhary, P.P. for the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and the police investigation diary. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that similarly situated co-accused Mehbood has been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court under section 438 Cr.P.C. From perusal of para 5 of the order impugned, it appears that a sum of Rs.90,000/- has been robbed. It further appears from perusal of the order impugned that recovery of the robbed amount has not been effected. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it cannot be said that the petitioner is not involved in the commission 2 of crime. In the circumstances, therefore, in my view, it is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The bail application filed by the petitioner under section 438 Cr.P.C. is, therefore, dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-