IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30232 of 2010 ANIL KUMAR @ RAMADHAR SINGH.. PETITIONER Versus STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR ………..OPP.PARTIES. ----------- 3 23-2-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for opposite party no.2, the complainant. On the last occasion counsel for opposite party no.2 had raised a grievance that the terms of compromise were not honoured by the petitioner. The matter was adjourned to enable the parties to iron out their differences. Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 submits that now the dispute has been resolved and the parties have entered into an effective compromise. In that view of the matter this second application for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner is disposed of with a direction that he should appear in the court below ( Judicial Magistrate, Ist. Class, Gaya) within six weeks from today and in that event, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.7,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each in complaint case no. 477 of 2009 on the understanding that the parties have compromised their differences. Naresh ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)