IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.986 of 2009 Date of decision: 22.12.2009 Charanjit Kaur ......Petitioner(s) Versus Gurcharan Singh ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Jagjit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.C. Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Reply by way of affidavit of Sh. Manjit Singh, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub-Division Adampur, has been filed according to which the whereabouts of the respondent are not known. The aforesaid affidavit is taken on record. The grievance of the petitioner in this contempt petition is that the respondent has not paid the amount of maintenance as awarded by this Court under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act vide order dated 21.10.2008. As per the aforesaid affidavit and also the various reports submitted by the Process Servicing Agency of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalandhar, the respondent could not be served for want of his correct address as he was not found residing at the given address. In view of the aforesaid fact, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he be given liberty to seek an appropriate remedy in FAO No.160-M of 2007. In view of the fact that respondent is not being served, I am not inclined to proceed further in this petition. COCP No.986 of 2009 -2- Rule discharged. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek any other remedy available to her in accordance with law. December 22, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE