IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 73 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 73 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 73 OF 2007 IN IN IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 108 OF 2007 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 108 OF 2007 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 108 OF 2007 Pushpa Pramod Shenoy & Anr. ... Applicant. V/s. State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. Ms.Manjiri Parasnis for the applicant. S.S.Pednekar, APP for the State. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 5th October 2007. DATED: 5th October 2007. DATED: 5th October 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- . This revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 29th December, 2004 in Criminal Case No.334/P/2000 by Metroplitan Magistrate, 23rd Court, Esplanade, Mumbai. The revision is filed in the month of March, 2007 i.e. after about a period of 2 years and 2 months. 2. By this application, the applicants are seeking condonation of delay in filing revision application. 3. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 4. After having seen the application and the reasons mentioned therein, I do see any case made out to issue notice to the respondents on the prayer for condonation of delay. The cause shown can hardly be said to be a sufficient cause. 5. Even otherwise, considering the nature of complaint and offence alleged, I do not see any merit in the revision application. 6. In the result, application for condonation of delay is rejected. Revision papers be consigned to record. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE