IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P.-T- No. 2802 of 2008. Decided on 29th April, 2011. _____________________________________________________ Tilak Raj. …Petitioner. -Versus- The Secretary Education, Government of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Anuj Nag, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. Anuj Nag, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present petition, in order to enable his client to make a representation for the redressal of his grievance to respondent No. 2. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to make a representation for the redressal of his grievance to respondent No. 2 within a period of three weeks from today. Thereafter, the same shall be decided by the respondent No. 2 by passing a speaking/detailed order, within a further period of eight weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. In case the representation of the petitioner is 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 - considered favourably, he shall be entitled to all the consequential benefits. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge April 29, 2011. (bhupender) - 3 - `