1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1855 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO. 1534 OF 1982 Rustom Boman Irani ....Plaintiff Versus M/s. Rizvi Builders & Ors. ....Defendants Mr. Y. R. Shah, Advocate for the Plaintiff. Mr. Pankaj Kawali i/b. Deepak Lad, Advocate for Defendant No.1. Mr. Srivastava i/b. M/s. Puranik & Co., Advocate for Defendant No.2. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATE : 20TH JANUARY, 2010. P.C. : Heard learned Counsel for the Plaintiff and Defendants. 2. The Plaintiff has taken the present chamber summons for permission to amend the plaint in terms of schedule annexed to the chamber summons. By the proposed amendment, the Plaintiff wants to furnish better particulars of the claim made in the suit. Similar averment, made in the proposed amendment was also made in an affidavit in support of notice of motion no. 3 of 2003 by the Plaintiff. However, the said notice of motion is already disposed of and therefore, the Plaintiff took out the present chamber summons. The proposed amendment is not contrary to the case made out in the plaint. The nature of 2 the suit will not also be changed by the said amendment. In these circumstances, the chamber summons is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). 3. Necessary amendment be carried out by the Plaintiff within a period of two weeks from today and amended copy of the plaint be served on the Defendants within further period of two weeks. 4. Needless to mention that the Defendants are at liberty to file additional written statement. Sd/- (R. V. MORE, J.)