Court No.2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 585/2008 Ram Lal ………… Petitioner Versus Conservator of Forest & another ………… Respondents ……………….. Sri Sharad Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri Paresh Tripathi, learned Brief Holder for the respondents. Date: Sep. 09, 2008. Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. The petitioner has an alternative remedy before the State Public Services Tribunal. The grievance of the petitioner is of mutual transfer from Lansdwone Circle to Dehradun Circle of Forest department. The other person from Dehradun has been transferred to Lansdowne but the petitioner is being kept at Lansdowne. When the transfer was mutual, why the petitioner is being kept at Lansdowne. It is also material to note that the mutual transfer was affected in pursuance of the G.O. dated 27.06.2006. Sri Sharad Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter is not cognizable by the State Public Services Tribunal against the transfer order. As I have been stated above, it is the only effect of the Government Order to be enforced as one person has been transferred and the petitioner has been left. Therefore, it is not a case of simple transfer but it is a case of enforcement of G.O. which the State Public Service Tribunal can adjudicate. Hence the petitioner is relegated to the State Public Services Tribunal. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed and the petitioner is directed to approach the Tribunal. The Tribunal shall decide the matter within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. (P.C.V., J.) 09.09.2008 Bhaskar