sanjay 1 s-395.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 395 OF 2010 Deepak Baliram Rane. ... Plaintiff. V/s. 1. Ravindra Raghunath Khamkar. 2. Sulochana Raghunath Khamkar. ... Defendants. Ramesh Jain for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants. CORAM : D.Y.Chandrachud, J. DATED : 11 March 2011. P.C. : The suit has been instituted under order 37 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 on the basis of the dishonour of two cheques aggregating to Rs.2 lakhs furnished by the Defendants to the Plaintiff towards discharge of a liability due and owing to the Plaintiff. The cheques were dishonoured on presentation to the bank on 22 October 2009 and 27 October 2009. 2. The Defendants have been served with a writ of summons, but have not entered appearance. The Plaintiff has relied upon a compilation of original documents on the sanjay 2 s-395.10 basis of which the claim has been duly proved. In terms of the provisions of order 37 rule 6(a), the Plaintiff would be entitled to judgment. The suit is accordingly decreed as prayed with modification that the Plaintiff would be entitled to interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of the suit until payment or realization. There shall be refund of court fees, if any, as per rules. (D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)