IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD NOVEMBER 2011 / 2ND AGRAHAYANA 1933 FAO.No. 278 of 2011 --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DT. 03.09.2011 IN EA.NO.119 OF 2011 IN EP.NO.217 OF 2009 IN OS.164/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE SUB COURT, PALA. .................... APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS/JUDGMENT DEBTORS: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. JAINAMMA KEZEKKIEL, W/O. K.J. HEZEKKIEL, AGED 48 YEARS, KAYYALAKKAKATH (H), ERUMAPRAMATTOM PO, ERUMAPRA KARA, KELUKAVU VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK. 2. K.J. HEZEKKIEL, S/O. JOHN, AGED 52 YEARS, KAYYALAKKAKATH (H), ERUMAPRAMATTOM PO, ERUMAPRA KARA, MELUKAVU VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN SRI.M.D.SASIKUMAR SRI.GEORGE MATHEW SRI.DIPU JAMES RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT/DECREE HOLDER: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- STATE BANK OF INDIA, ERATTUPETTA BRANCH, REP. BY MANAGER, ERATUPETTA PO, ERATTUPETTA VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. PIN 686 652. ADDL.R2: SUNNY SEBASTIAN, S/O. DEVASSIA, MUNDATHANATH HOUSE, PUNNATHARA KARA, ETTUMANOOR VILLAGE, VETTIMUGAL PO, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686 631. (ADDITIONAL R2 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 18.11.2011 IN I.A.NO.3013/11). ADV. SRI.DEVAPRASANTH.P.J. FOR R2 SRI.K.S.DILIP FOR R1 THIS FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDERS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/11/2011 ALONG WITH FAO NO. 280 OF 2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M. JOSEPH & A. M. SHAFFIQUE, JJ. ----------------------------------------- FAO.NOS.278 & 280 OF 2011 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 23rd November, 2011 JUDGMENT K.M. Joseph, J. The Appeals arise from orders refusing to set aside sale under Order XXI Rule 90 CPC. 2. In the meantime, the appellants have entered into a compromise with the auction purchasers as per which the auction purchasers agreed for setting aside the sale. Learned counsel for the decree holder/bank does not dispute that the decree stands satisfied by withdrawal of the amounts deposited by the auction purchasers and he further submits that the decree holder/bank has no objection in the auction sales being set aside. Accordingly, we dispose of the Appeals in terms of the compromise petitions (IA.Nos.3711 & 3710/2011 respectively) and the sale will stand set aside. It is open to the appellants to move the court below in terms FAO.278 & 280 OF 2011 2 of Clause (5) and it is for the court below to decide. The compromise petitions will form part of the order. Sd/= K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE Sd/= A. M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE kbk. // True Copy// PS to Judge