IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8550 of 2008 MASHKOOR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 16.07.2008 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the State as well as the informant. With regard to same occurrence of kidnapping of a girl two cases were instituted. The first one was Amour P.S. Case No. 54/07 and the second one was Complaint Case No. 1367/07. Police case was instituted by the cousin brother of Arshadi, who is said to have been kidnapped and complaint case has been instituted by Arshadi herself under Sections 366A, 376/34 of the IPC. In the police case petitioner is named, but in the complaint case his name is not there. The statement of victim girl has been recorded under Section 164 Cr. P.C., in which she had also not named the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner submits that his name has falsely been mentioned by the informant in Amour P.S. Case No. 54/07. Considering these facts, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner, namely, Mashkoor is allowed. In the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from today in the court below, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Amour P.S. Case No. 54 of 2007 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnia, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. DKS/ (Mridula Mishra, J)