IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 31st day of March, 2010 Ist Bail Application No. 382 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Amit Sharma .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party ___________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No. 227/2009 (ST No. 375/2009), U/s 302, 307, 34, 212, 120-B IPC, PS Ranipur, District Haridwar. _______________________________________________________________ March 31, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Mr. Vinod Sharma, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Heard. Learned Counsel for the accused applicant argued that the applicant is not named in the FIR and even there is no direct evidence collected by the Investigating Officer against the applicant to connect him with the said crime. He further submitted that the co-accused Ravi @ Randhir, Anil @ Vikas and Rajesh have been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 16.12.2009, 17.12.2009 and 22.12.2009 respectively and the present accused applicant is also entitled for bail on the basis of parity. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Amit Sharma be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 31.3.2010 PRABODH