Civil Revision No.6696 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6696 of 2011 Date of Decision : 04.11.2011 Mela Singh .......Petitioner Versus Surjit Kaur and others .......Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Ms. Malkiat Mann, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** JITENDRA CHAUHAN, J. (ORAL) The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, for setting aside the impugned order dated 03.10.2011 (Annexure P-1), passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Sunam, whereby the application moved by the applicant for seeking another opportunity to compare the thumb-impression of Kirpal Singh, the executant of the Will dated 5.7.1997, was dismissed. The Will in question was allegedly executed on 5.7.1997 and was registered on 6.5.2005, by Kirpal Singh in favour of Mela Singh. The prayer in the present revision petition is to permit the petitioner to examine the witness of the Will and a document expert, who were allegedly not present at the time of the evidence of the 1 Civil Revision No.6696 of 2011 defendant. From the perusal of the record, it is apparent that from the very beginning, the petitioner was aware about the facts and the type of evidence to be led. There is nothing on record to suggest that opportunity sought by the petitioner would advance the interest of justice as the document sought to be proved is in possession of the petitioner from the very beginning. The sole purpose for filing the application for examining the witnesses is only to delay the adjudication of the suit, which was filed in the year 2006. In this view of the matter, this Court finds no reason to interfere in the well reasoned order passed by the learned trial Court. Dismissed. ( JITENDRA CHAUHAN ) 04.11.2011 JUDGE atulsethi Note: Whether to be referred to reporter ? Yes/No 2