W.P. No. 1177 (MS) of 2006 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri H.M. Raturi, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Harendra Belwal, learned Standing Counsel for the State/respondent nos. 1 to 5. Counsel for the parties have submitted that the controversy raised by means of this writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment of the this Court delivered on 19.07.2006 passed in writ petition no. 930(ms)2006, Kendra Singh Chauhan and 13 others vs. State of Uttaranchal and four others, as such, the present writ petition may also be disposed of on the same terms and observations expressed in the aforesaid judgment. In view of the aforesaid statement the present writ petition is also disposed of on the same terms and observations made in writ petition no. 930(ms)2006, Kendra Singh Chauhan and 13 others, delivered on 19.07.2006. The stay application no. 11095 of 2006 stands disposed of. Let a copy of this order be supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioner, today on payment of usual charges. (M.M.G., J.) 30.08.2006: NCM: