HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ.& HON'BLE SHRI RANGNATHCHANDRAKAR, J. IVI.A.(ClNo. 986 of 2009 Appellants ResDondents 1. Smt. Jamuna Bai,iaged about 22 years, w/o. Late Doctor Yadav. 2. Smt. Sevti Bai, aged about 50 years, w/o. Niyamat Yadav. 3. Niyamat Yadav, aged about 55 years, S/o. Gorang Yadav. R/o. Gram Sarona, R.D. Quarter, Thana Amanaka, Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur (CG). VERSUS 1. Arvind Patel, agedjabout 27 years, S/o. Ramesh Patel, occupation- Truck Driver, R/o. Station Chowk, - Satna, District Satna (MP). 2. Smt. Kamaljeet Kayr, w/o. Amar Pal Singh Gandhi, R/o. Baihar Road, Balaghat, Tah. & Dist. Balaghat (MP). 3. The Orienta! Insurance Company Ltd., through Divisional Managr, Div. Office No.1, Kutehari Chowk, Jall Road, Tah. & Dist. Raipur(CG). 4. Symal Dhimar, S/o. Budhram Dhimar, occupation Truck Driver, R/o. Subhash Nagar, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (CG). 5. Masers Udisa Kankreet & Alide Inds. Ltd. through Managing Director, R.S.D. Colbny, Kapa, Raipur (CG). 6. The New india Insurance Co. Ltd., through Divisional Manager, Divisional Office No.2, Jeevan Beema Marg, Pandri, Raipyr (CG). Memorandum of appeal U/S. 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Present: None for the appetlants. Shri G.S. Patel, counsel for respondent No.3. Ms. Farah Minhaz, counsel for respondent No,4. Shri Deepak Gupta, counsel for respondent No.5. ORDER (1fhMarch,2010) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. None forthe appellants. 2) As there is no representationon behalf of the appeilants, we are left with rio other option, but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge padma