IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1941 of 2009 Between: K.Pratap Rao S/o.Late K.Seenaiah R/o.H.No.158/C, LIGH, Santosh Nagar colony Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The APSRTC, rep.by its Regional Manager, ASRTC Hyderabad City Region, Hyderabad 2 The APSRTC, rep.by its Depot Manager, Rajendra nagar Bus Depot, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.G.RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondents:MR.K.MADHAVA REDDY(SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an order direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent office in recovering an amount of Rs.400/- per month from the salary of the petitioner without issuing any notice to the petitioner as the same is illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to stop the recovery an amount of @ 400/- per month.” At the hearing, Sri G.Ravi Mohan, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of the averments mentioned in the counter-affidavit filed by the respondents that the amount recovered from the petitioner was refunded vide cheque No.802094, dated 25.03.2009, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is, therefore, disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.2457 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 1st APRIL, 2009. kvni