C P (m )fr siNQLEBENcH n the Hon’ble High Court of Chhattisgg Bilasur. ; dw ¢fitioner _ / Smt. ‘y'aneshwari Soni, ged 43 years; W/o Shri R.P.So /o Block No. 46/D’-Durg, (200 Unit andini Town Shi Thil Dh stt DurgCG. as' amdha? Di. Vrsus e Rts /1~ .\ esponden e State Govt of Chhattisgarh, hmug ,—- TheSecretary, igheFv-Edlcaticn, D.K.SV. Bhaw aipur‘,(C.G. k T'lPati, he‘KLI‘' PLRaVi Shankar Shgkla Vishva-Vidya‘lay ¥a, hePr‘ghmp , égéiiék 1 g, andlmfiNagar; ahsi Dhamdh‘a, istt; 13mg G he Presi Nagrlk Kalyan Mhavidy'ala andiIJi Nagar, Tahsil Dhamdh istt.‘Dmg ECG. xT N i ‘ 1 N ’D (C) T dent, J aya, N a, > D ) Shri Ram Naresh Tando’n, aged abeut 3 0‘ ears, Asstt Pro£ess0r (Sociology agrik Kaly’an MahavidyaJay l /L ‘7 I m: p dik v E G A ‘mi,i R’ ) N p, Th Th Hi an, _R_) y ) N a, HIGH COURT OF CHHATFISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S! NO.5249 OF 2007 Smt. Gyaneshwari Sonl‘ Versus Others The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitionei’. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS , N‘ Present :7 ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 15‘ day of February, 201 1) e At the very outset, leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petition involving the identical question of law has already been considered and dismissed by this Coart vide order dated 31-1 us there is nothing in Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in the same terms. ‘ Sd/~ ' I Satish K. Agnihotrl Judge -2oo7 in w.P.(S)' No.593 or2007, th this matter to‘press. Gowri