“g ' d w Lamw‘ r PETITIONER k Albert Wi1fred S/o Wilfred, Adam, aged about 68 years R/o Village — Jyotipur, Pendra Road, District BILASPUR C G . Bilaspur C G WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE i OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARI ETC OR DIRECTION ORDER x IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC ‘ . N singgg Bgnch \ W ‘ m q g g r o w k j pg.Nn M‘PCJ’i/J Q“ I gé’ekw é‘esemeé‘w damw ,, s gig)“ ‘ a§~ , 2" ‘ KL,“ w/ m . /& rf‘:~§. V RESPONDENTS 1. State of C.G. / through the the Secretary x Tribal Welfare t ‘ Welfare Department, DKS r. §”g0?‘ $E Bhawan Raipur C.G. 2. Assistant 6‘ 6%;05 G‘gmA5P“ ' Commissioner ”a: gg G‘gmA was ‘9 I i . ’T r1 'b a1 Deve1opment B1 ‘1 aspur ' ’ c.G. _ Block _ Education Officer”- Xl-HC-78 mm,m,i‘ww @ mama? ~ (x0?/+67q 20% WW(W) WW§WW éxwm WWIWW 31 ~8-2006 Mr. Rakesh Pandey, counsel for The peTiTioner. Miss Deepali Pandey, Pc‘mel Lawyer for The 5TaTe/respondenTs, on advance copy. Heard bofh The counsel. The pgfifioner is The hus‘ working as Assisfam- Teacher it fhe Office of Assismnf Teache sick, Therefore, she was on medi‘ an 22-4-2004, 'buT she was noT produce The fiTness cerTificaTe The fiTness cerTificaTe of The allowed To join duTy on 19-10-2004. ThereafTer, she was allowed To join duTy offer six monThs and for ThaT pa aand of LaTe SmT. Pushpavafi AlberT, who was I Primary School, Tlkarkala and she demiTTed r on 31-4-2005. As The peTiTioner's wife was :al leave and ThereafTer, she reporTed on duTy allowed To join duTy and she was direcTed To of The Medical Board on which she produced Board on 24-7-2004 and ulTimaTely she was "iod no salary was paid To The peTiTioner’s wife. The peTiTioner's wife made a rep'resenTaTion daTed 28-9—2005 (Annexure P-9) for paymenT of salary of The s decided and ulTimaTely she died c prayed ThaT The respondenTs be from 224-2004 To 19-10-2004. peTiTioner submiTs ThaT The respondenT auThoriTies have noT passed any rder on The represenTaTion of The wife of The peTiTioner namely, Annexure P— which was submiTTed by her on 28-9-2005. Learned counsel furTher sub 'Ts ThaT Therefore, in The firsT insTance, respondenT No.2 be direcTed o decide The represenTaTion made by The :aid period, buT ThaT represenTaTion was noT n 25m February, 2006. Therefore, iT has been direcTed To pay salary for The said period Lé. Learned counsel for Th l i l r P.T.O. XI-HC-78 'wg zooé 5 WW(W) mmwm ~ 2. pe‘ri‘rioner's wife 1'0 which Iearne has no objec‘rion. ‘ Having heard Iearned con. facts and circumsTances of fhe ( represemc‘rion Annexure P-9 f payment of salary for six mo hs' period, in accordance with Iaw, within a period of Two morifhs from ihe Wi‘l‘h fhe direc‘rian afore: Pariies are emitted for a Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge WW§wW éqmm soma d counsel appearing for fhe Sfme/respondems nsel for fhe parfies and having regard To 1'he :ase, respondem‘ No.2 is direcfed *0 decide fhe Ied by 'l'he wife of the pei‘ifioner regarding e of receipt of a copy of fhis order. laid, The pei'iiion si'ands disposed of. :rfified copy of this order. P.T.O.