IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI TUESDAY, THE 9TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 18TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 33426 of 2010(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. ARUN MANZOOR, AGED 25, S/O.MOHAMMED MANZOOR, HOUSE NO.91(B), PUNNATHALA NAGAR, THIRUMULLAVARAM P.O., KOLLAM-12. 2. MOHAMMED MANZOOR, AGED 51, S/O.LATE MOHAMMED MUSTHAFA, HOUSE NO.91(B), PUNNATHALA NAGAR, THIRUMULLAVARAM P.O., KOLLAM-12. 3. SHAMSIYA S., AGED 49, W/O.MOHAMMED MANZOOR, HOUSE NO.91(B), PUNNATHALA NAGAR, THIRUMULLAVARAM P.O., KOLLAM-12. 4. NAZREEN, AGED 23, D/O.SHAMSIYA S., HOUSE NO.91(B), PUNNATHALA NAGAR, THIRUMULLAVARAM P.O., KOLLAM-12. BY ADV. SRI.NOBLE MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KILIMANOOR POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN – 695 001. 2. MR.SHAJI M.I., CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARYANAD POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST, PIN – 695 001. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NEDUMANGAD, PIN – 682 509. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695 001. Mn ...2/- WP(C).No. 33426 of 2010(C) -2- 5. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695 001. 6. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695 001. 7. SMT.JESIYA, AGED 22, D/O.RAHUMATH BEEVI, RESIDING AT KODIVILA VEEDU, KILIMANOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695 601. R1, R3 TO R6 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. ALEX M. THOMBRA R2 BY ADVS. SRI.ESM.KABEER SRI.A.SHAJEEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn K.M.JOSEPH & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. * * * * * * * * * * * * * W.P.C.No.33426 of 2010 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of November 2010 J U D G M E N T K.M.JOSEPH,J The petitioners have approached this Court complaining of harassment by respondents 1 and 2, police officers. There is reference to the 1st petitioner got married to the 7th respondent and disputes between them. The 2nd respondent is a police officer. According to the petitioner, the 2nd respondent is harassing the petitioner by interfering in the matter. 2. The case of the 2nd respondent, on the other hand, is that the 2nd respondent is a close relative of the 7th respondent and there being no male members in the family, he only interceded. According to him, 1.5 Kgs of gold, a Squada car, liquid cash of 20 lakhs and three acres of property are being misappropriated by the 1st petitioner. Sri.E.S.M.Kabeer, the learned counsel on behalf of the 2nd respondent would submit that the 2nd respondent has not harassed the petitioners. He has no intention to harass the petitioners. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that respondent 1 also will not W.P.C.No.33426 of 2010 2 harass the petitioners in any way. According to him, no complaint has been received against the petitioners. 3. We record the submissions and dispose of this writ petition leaving it open to the parties to work out their remedies in the appropriate forum. (K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE) (M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE) jsr // True Copy// PA to Judge W.P.C.No.33426 of 2010 3 W.P.C.No.33426 of 2010 4 K.M.JOSEPH & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. .No. of 200 ORDER/JUDGMENT 30/082010