Civil Revision No. 1779 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 1779 of 2010 Date of Decision: 6.7.2010 Rakesh Mahendru …Petitioner Versus Nepal Dass Nagpal and Others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Senior Advocate with Shekhar Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Kathuria, Advocate for respondent No.1. None for respondents No.2 to 4. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Heard learned counsel for the parties. This Court is of the view that in case an opportunity is granted to the petitioner to conclude his entire evidence, at his own risk and responsibility, it will serve interest of justice. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 contends that the petitioner has unnecessarily delayed the proceedings and he ought to be compensated in monetary terms. I find merit in the contention raised by learned counsel for respondent No.1. The petitioner is fastened with a cost of Rs.10,000/-. Subject to deposit of cost, one opportunity is granted to the petitioner to Civil Revision No. 1779 of 2010 2 conclude his entire evidence, at his own risk and responsibility. With the observations made above, the present revision petition is disposed of. A copy of this order be given dasti, on payment of usual charges. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge July 6, 2010 “DK”