IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 3061 of 2011. Decided on 17th May, 2011. Sumita Rani. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Neeraj K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is a contract teacher. She is aggrieved since she is sought to be replaced by a PTA appointee, the third respondent. According to the third respondent, there is a vacancy available for the petitioner, which is around 3 Kms. In case the third respondent is in a position to obtain the willingness of the petitioner to work in any vacancy, the second respondent shall act on that willingness. In case in the process there is a resultant vacancy, the third respondent shall be engaged and continued as PTA teacher till he is otherwise replaced by the regular appointee. Needless to say that the petitioner shall be permitted forthwith to re-join at Government Middle School, Dhanyal 2 in case she is not willing to be accommodated in any of the vacancies pointed out by the private respondent 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 17th May, 2011 (Justice Sanjay Karol), (tr) Judge.