1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08.06.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN C.R.P(PD)(MD)Nos.1002 & 1003 of 2011 C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.1002 of 2011 M.Pandian :Petitioner/Respondent/Petitioner -Vs- The Idol of Sri Renganathaswamy, Srirangam, Trichy, Rep.by its Executive Officer. :Respondent/Respondent/Objector PRAYER in C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1002 of 2011: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the learned District Judge, Tiruchirapalli to dispose of I.A.No.1947 of 2009 in Trust O.P.No.1 of 2009 pending on the file of District Judge, Tiruchirapalli dated 27.04.2011. C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.1003 of 2011 M.Pandian :Petitioner/Respondent/Petitioner -Vs- The Idol of Sri Kailasanathaswamy Big Bazaar Street, Trichy, Rep.by its Executive Officer. :Respondent/Respondent/Objector PRAYER in C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1003 of 2011:Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the learned District Judge, Tiruchirapalli to dispose of I.A.No.1948 of 2009 in Trust O.P.No.1 of 2009 pending on the file of District Judge, Tiruchirapalli dated 27.04.2011. For Petitioner:Mr.K.Srinivasan, in both CRPs Senior Counsel for M.P.Senthil. COMMON ORDER The revisions have been filed seeking a direction to dispose of I.A.No.1947 of 2009 and I.A.No.1948 of 2009 filed by the petitioner herein. 2.The petitioner herein filed a Trust O.P.No.1 of 2009 seeking permission to alienate the trust property and the said permission was granted on 13.04.2009 and thereafter, the property was also sold. On 21.07.2009, two applications were filed by the Respondent objecting to the Trust O.P which was already ordered and counter was also filed on 14.08.2009 by the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 petitioner and thereafter, the matter is being adjourned for enquiry. 3.It is seen from the diary extracts that the matter is being adjourned from 26.08.2009 onwards for enquiry. At one stage, the matter was argued and again reopened and fresh arguments were advanced. Even after that also, the matter has been adjourned only for the purpose of arguments. Having waited for more than two years, now the petitioner is before this Court seeking for early disposal of two I.As filed by the respondents. 4.Considering the fact that the applications were filed in the year 2009 and the matter is being adjourned from 23.06.2009 onwards for enquiry and arguments, it is appropriate to direct the trial Court to dispose of I.As on merits on or before 29.07.2011. Since the petition filed by the respondent is directed to be disposed of, no prejudice is caused to the respondent by giving such direction. 5.With the above direction, these Civil Revision Petition are disposed of. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) / TRUE COPY / Sub Assistant Registrar To: The District Judge, Tiruchirapalli. +2CC to Mr.M.P.Senthil, Advocate. SR.Nos.17671 & 17672. gsr RP/23.06.2011/2P/4C. C.R.P(PD)(MD)Nos.1002 & 1003 of 2011 08-06-2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/