AJN 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW APPLICATION NO.240 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1109 OF 2009 Pune District Co-operative Society, District Court Campus, Pune & Anr. ... Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. A.V. Anturkar i/b S.B. Deshmukh for the applicants. Mr. A.S. Gadkari, A.P.P. for the State. Ms. Rutuja Ambekar for respondent 11. CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & R.G. KETKAR, JJ. DATED : 10TH SEPTEMBER, 2009. P.C.:- 1. Review is sought of our order dated 29/6/2009 passed in Writ Petition No.1109 of 2009. 2. At the outset, we must state that learned A.P.P. has raised a preliminary objection that the review is not maintainable. AJN 2 3. In our opinion, it is not necessary to go into that aspect of the matter because in the order of which review is sought, we have merely recorded the statement made by learned A.P.P. that the investigation will be impartial, expeditious and those who are involved in the crime will be brought to book. In paragraph 6, we have also stated that it is not possible for us to express any view on the investigation so far conducted. It is evident, therefore, that we had not considered prayers other than prayer (a) of the petition. It is, therefore, open to the applicants to file a fresh petition agitating the prayers other than prayer (a) of the petition. 4. There is no question of reviewing our order dated 29/6/2009 assuming that review application is maintainable. Review application is disposed of in the aforestated terms. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [R.G. KETKAR, J.]