..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1069 OF 2007 Mr.Vijay Popatlal Singhvi. ...Applicant. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Mr.A.P.Mundargi, Sr. Advocate with A.B.Vagyani, Adv. for the Applicant. Mr.S.S.Pednekar, APP, for the State. Mr.Dilip Vishnu Pote, Orig.Complainant present in-person. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 21st April, 2007. DATED : 21st April, 2007. DATED : 21st April, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. The applicant - orig.accused and the orig.complainant - Dilip Pote are present in-person. I have also heard the orig.complainant. 2. The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in C.R.No.28 of 2007 of Haveli Police Station, Pune. The said case is under Sections 420, 406, 409 of IPC. ..(2).. 3. The complaint in the present case has arisen on account of a dispute in respect of first floor of Flat No.4, Rupalaxmi Co-operative Housing Society, Pune situated in Survey No.29. 4. During pendency of the application, the orig. complainant and the applicant -orig.accused have amicably settled the matter and have arrived at consent terms. The said consent terms are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. 5. The orig.complainant has stated that if the applicant undertakes to bear all the expenses for execution and registration of the documents in respect of transfer of the said flat in his name, the complainant has no objection for quashing of the said case. 6. Mr.Vagyani, on instructions from the applicant who is present in Court, states that the applicant will bear all the expenses for execution of registration of all the documents in respect of transfer of the said Flat in the name of the complainant. In view of this, the complainant states that he has no objection to anticipatory ..(3).. bail being granted and the said C.R. being quashed. 7. In view of the fact that the matter has been amicably settled and in view of the statements of the complainant and the applicant, the C.R.No.28 of 2007 of Haveli Police Station, Pune is quashed. 8. Application is disposed of. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)