IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.2219 of 2007 Shashi Kant Mishra & Anr Versus Rajiv Ranjan Rai @ Rajiv Ranja ---------------------------------- 3 28-7-2011 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. By the impugned order the learned court below has allowed the restoration application registered as Miscellaneous Case No. 2 of 2005. This Miscellaneous Case No. 2 of 2005 had been filed for restoration of another Miscellaneous Case No. 13 of 2004 for setting aside the ex- parte decree passed in T.S.No. 15 of 2004 . In the impugned order the learned court below has considered the sufficiency of cause, as shown by the applicant, for restoration of Miscellaneous Case No. 13 of 2004 and has allowed the restoration application. There does not appear to be any illegality or jurisdictional error in the impugned order. This revision application is, accordingly, dismissed. It goes without saying that the learned court below will expedite hearing and dispose of Miscellaneous Case No. 13 of 2004, preferably within six weeks. roy ( V. Nath, J.)