IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17485 of 2011 1. Raman Ram 2. Rajesh Ram 3. Jeevan Ram @ Ram Jeevan Ram 4. Gulabyan Kuer Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2 30.06.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners being the brothers and mother of the husband and the husband himself are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 304B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The marriage was performed in the year 2002. The accusation is of demand of dowry and torture. It is alleged that the victim was killed by poisoning. It is submitted that during the investigation, the accusation was found false and the final form was submitted showing mistake, thereafter, on protest the cognizance has been taken. Considering the fact that the accusation was found false by the police during investigation, let the 2 above named petitioner nos. 1, 2 and 4, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Saran at Chapra in connection with Complaint/Protest No. 1884/2004 arising out of Avtar Nagar P.S. Case No. 71/2003, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. So far as petitioner no. 3 is concerned, since he is the husband, let the learned court below consider the regular bail of petitioner no.3 in the aforesaid case keeping in view that the accusation was found false by the police during investigation. With the above observation, the application with regard to petitioner no.3 is, accordingly, disposed off. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) 3