IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 29TH JUNE 2009 / 8TH ASHADHA 1931 RP.No. 155 of 2009() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN OP.34394/2000 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- P.VIJAYAKUMARI , MANAGER P.A.M.M.U.P. SCHOOL, KALLEPPULLY, PALAKKAD 678 005. BY ADV. SRI.B.GOPAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER PALAKKAD. 3. ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,PALAKKAD. 4. P.K.RADHAMANI, SREEKARTHIKA L.N.PURAM, PALAKKAD. ADV. SRI.T.A.SHAJI GOVT. PLEADER SRI. DILIP MOHAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= R.P. No. 155 of 2009 in W. P (C) No. 34394 of 2000 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 29th June, 2009. O R D E R The respondent in the original petition, who is the manager of a school in which the petitioner in the original petition was the Headmistress, is the petitioner in the review petition. The contention of the petitioner in the review petition is that when the matter was posted for hearing, the advocate whose name was shown in the cause list, had ceased to be an advocate and therefore the petitioner had no notice about the posting of the case. As a result, the original petition happened to be disposed of without hearing the counsel for the petitioner in the review petition. In view of the same, she seeks review of the judgment dated 30-11-2007 in the original petition. 2. I have heard both parties. 3. It is true that the advocate whose name was shown in the cause list had ceased to be an advocate by the time the original petition was heard. Therefore, in the interest of justice, I am of opinion that the petitioner in the review petition should be given an opportunity of being heard in the matter. In the above circumstances, I allow the review petition, recall my judgment dated 30-11-2007 and post the original petition for hearing along with W.P(C) Nos. 1722/2006 and 21969/2006. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.