IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 7TH JULY 2009 / 16TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 17217 of 2009(V) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- M/S GOLD CITY, CITY CENTRE, DOOR NO. XI/208 A, COURT JN, MANNARKKAD REPRESENTED BY IT'S MANAGER PARTNER P. ABOOBACKER. BY ADV. MR. BOBBY JOHN MR. P.N.DAMODARAN NAMBOODIRI RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, DEPARTMENT OF COMMECIAL TAXES, MANNARKKAD. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (AA), DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, PALAKKAD. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. C.K. GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P. (C) No. 17217 of 2009 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 7th day of July, 2009 JUDGMENT The grievance of the petitioner is that, despite Ext.P12 appellate order passed by the third respondent, the second respondent is yet to pass modified order in respect of the assessment year 2006 - '07 and the callous inaction on the part of the said respondent is stated as causing much hardships to the petitioner, which in turn is sought to be intercepted by this Court. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, he has already approached the first respondent projecting his grievance by filing Ext.P7 representation. The learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that, the matter can be disposed of, giving appropriate direction to the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P7. 4. In the above facts and circumstances, the first respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P7 in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is made clear that, till such appropriate orders are passed on Ext.P7, all further coercive proceedings, stated as being pursued against the WP (C) No.17217 of 2009 : 2 : petitioner, shall be kept in abeyance. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE kmd