IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.20184-M of 2010 Date of Decision:1.11.2010 Bimla Kumari .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary, Advocate for Mr. R.K. Arya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kirat Singh Sidhu, D.A.G. Punjab. Mr. Raj Karan Singh, Advocate for Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to look into the matter FIR case No.47 dated 6.4.2010 registered under Sections 307/308/325/323/148/149 IPC. Upon notice, reply has been filed on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3-State. As per the reply, respondents No.4 to 6 are already in judicial custody. Thus, required action is already initiated. With respect to respondent No.7, it is stated in the reply that he was not present at the spot at the time of occurrence. Accordingly, he has been placed in column No.2 of the challan after verifying the facts. Accordingly, the present petition is rendered infructuous and is dismissed as such. 01.11.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE