IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1653 OF 2009 Moti Dinshaw Moriabadi/Irani and anr. ..Petitioners Vs. Shree Dara K. Moriabadi/Irani and others. ..Respondents Mr.J.S.Kini i/b. Suresh Dubey, Advocate for petitioners. Mr.R.M.Pethe i/b.Rajdeep S. Khadapkar, For Respondent Nos.1B, 2A, 2B,3,4A to 4E. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 22nd April, 2009. P.C. 1 This writ petition challenging the order passed by the trial Court refusing to appoint a Receiver. 2 The matter has been expedited by this Court and the trial Court is now directed to dispose the Suit by the end of June, 2009. 3 The trial Court has assigned cogent and satisfactory reasons for not appointing a Receiver. Firstly, identical relief was claimed in earlier application which came to be dismissed after hearing both sides. Secondly, the trial Court has come to a conclusion that the plaintiffs have failed to show that they have prima facie case and, therefore, it is just and convenient to appoint the Court Receiver. There is no case made out of any wastage or damage to the suit property. In these circumstances, by applying settled principles of law the trial court rejected the instant application. There is no reason to interfere with the order passed by the trial court. Writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. [ S.C.DHARMADHIKARI , J.] wp1653-09