IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11205 of 2005 SURENDRA KUMAR PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 03/ 05.04.2010 Heard Mr. Vijay Shankar Srivastava for the petitioner, Mr. Sanjay Prakash Verma, assisting counsel to G.A. 5 for the State and Mr. J.P. Karn for the Accountant General. The petitioner having superannuated from the post of Work Sarkar with effect from 30.4.2003 had filed the writ petition for fixation of his final pension and payment thereof together with its arrears, and payment of balance amount of earned leave. A counter affidavit was filed on behalf of the respondents and in which it was stated that the pension of the petitioner was authorized in the year 2005 itself and had been forwarded to the Treasury for payment thereof and that the petitioner was drawing regular pension. It was stated that there was no amount due in relation to the same. In so far as the leave encashment is concerned, it was stated that the Superintending Engineer was directed vide memo dated 26.11.2005 (Annexure- A) to enquire into the claim of the petitioner and take appropriate action. Having regard to the circumstances set forth, I am of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and the same is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to raise his grievance before the - 2 - respondent no. 6, the Executive Engineer, in case any of his grievance(s) remains pending and which shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)