1 Criminal Application No.186/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.186 OF 2011 Sayeed Muddassar Nazar Kazim ... APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & anr. ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri K.B. Autade, Advocate for applicant Shri V.H. Dighe, A.P.P. for respondent No.1. Shri H.D. Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent No.2 ..... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 25th March, 2011 PER COURT : 1. Heard. The controversy between the spouse has landed in the wife filing criminal prosecution vide Crime No. 317/2010. The predominant grievance of the wife is, the Talaqnama allegedly executed is itself fabricated document. No divorce in the manner it is projected, has taken place. The forged document is yet to be recovered. 2. The learned counsel representing the wife submits that the accused/ applicant has continued his threats and she apprehends for well being of her life. 2 Criminal Application No.186/2011 3. Mr. Autade, on instructions, submits, indeed there were no such threats, however, care will be taken that accused/ applicant Sayeed Muddassar shall not directly/ indirectly induce or coerce the wife. Accepting the above position, the interim protection dated 19.1.2011 is made absolute with the same attendance condition till 31st July 2011. The accused/ applicant shall furnish to the investigator the so called Talaqnama under an acknowledgement and also furnish his specimen signature whensoever so commanded. 4. The accused/ applicant shall desist from influencing, coercing or harassing the wife/ respondent No.2 in any manner. The accused/ applicant shall not visit at the residence of respondent No. 2 at Rastapur Road, Chanda, Taluka Newasa, District Ahmednagar or the village Chanda till disposal of the present proceedings. K.U. CHANDIWAL JUDGE fmp/cri186.11