IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3345 of 2010 VINAY MAHTO @ VINAY KUMAR . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02 29.01.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted under Sections 498A, 406, 504 and 506 of the Penal Code. The only submission advanced in support of the application is that the allegations are vague. This Court finds that the petitioner, who is husband of the complainant, has been named in the complaint. There is allegation in the complaint petition about payment of deficient dowry. This Court doest not find it to be a good case for anticipatory bail. Prayer for anticipatory bail is, accordingly, rejected. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)