C.R.No.3966 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3966 of 2011 Date of decision: 17.10.2011 Harpreet Singh ...Petitioner Versus Om Parkash Jain and another ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. K.P.Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. SP Garg, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. G.S.Sandhu, Advocate for respondent No.2. Ajay Kumar Mittal,J. 1. The plaintiff-petitioner has raised a grievance that the suit for permanent injunction had been filed by the plaintiff and the trial Court without deciding the application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC for interim injunction, adjourned the matter and in the meanwhile, respondent No.2 is carrying on construction on the land of the petitioner. 2. Respondents have put in appearance in pursuance of notice issued by this Court on 29.6.2011. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents state that application for interim injunction is still pending in the trial Court and present revision petition can be disposed of by directing the trial Court to expeditiously decide the said application for interim 1 C.R.No.3966 of 2011 injunction. 4. This Court on June 29, 2011 while issuing notice of motion had directed to maintain status quo regarding the suit property. 5. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, this revision petition is disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to decide the application for interim injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC on or before 31.12.2011. Till then, the interim order passed by this Court on 29.6.2011 shall continue. However, it may be observed that grant of interim order by this Court shall not affect the decision in interim injunction application by the trial Court. October 17, 2011 (Ajay Kumar Mittal) ‘gs’ Judge 2