IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2839 of 2000. Chhoti daughter of Shri Kalyan wife of Shri Ramswaroop and Others. VERSUS Board of Revenue for Rajasthan, Ajmer & Others Date Of Order ::: 13/03/2008. Hon'ble Mr. Narendra Kumar Jain J. Smt. Kamla Jain, Counsel for the Petitioners Shri N.C. Sharma and Shri Suresh Pareek, Counsel for the respondents By the Court : Heard learned counsel for the parties. The plaintiff/respondent nos.4 and 5 filed a revenue suit in the trial Court under Sections 88, 188 and 53 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, along with the application for temporary injunction, which was allowed by the S.D.O. Kota. However, the Appellate Court set aside the order of the S.D.O. Kota. The plaintiff preferred a revision petition before the Revenue Board, which was allowed vide impugned order dated 22.05.2000. The order passed by the Revenue Appellate court was set aside and the order of the trial Court was restored. The said order of the Revenue Board has been challenged by the defendants in the writ petition. A notice to show cause was given by this Court to the respondents as to why the writ petition may not be admitted and disposed of on 27.06.2000 and meanwhile the respondent nos.4 and 5 were directed to maintain the status- quo in the matter. The writ petition is pending for last more than seven-&-half-years. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the suit is still pending in the learned trial Court. Learned counsel for both the parties agree that a direction may be given to the learned trial Court to dispose of the suit itself expeditiously preferably within a period of one-year and the order passed by this Court dated 27.06.2000 may remain in force during the pendency of the suit. After considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I think it fit and proper to dispose of the writ petition finally with a direction to the trial Court to dispose of the suit itself expeditiously. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of. The S.D.O. Kota is directed to decide the main suit itself expeditiously preferably within a period of one-year, and during the pendency of the main suit, both the parties shall maintain the status-quo in respect of the property, in dispute. There will be no order as to costs. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. ashok/