IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15248 of 2009 DINESH KUMAR RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03/ 18.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. This petition for bail has been filed by the petitioner, who is an accused for offences punishable under sections 224, 225, 420, 468 and 120(B) of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a Warden in Mandal Kara, Gopalganj and on 19.03.2009 he was informed by the Charger that one person was missing and hence the other Wards were to be checked to verify as to whether the said prisoner had remained in other Ward, but on 20.03.2009 when the prisoners were counted one prisoner, namely, Sarbjit Chouhan was found missing. He further submits that immediately after getting information he apprised the Sr. Warden and the Assistant Jailor with respect to the aforesaid matter, which is clear from the supervision note. He also submits that the entire allegation against the petitioner is baseless, false and frivolous and suspicion against the petitioner is not supported by any material whatsoever. He also avers that the petitioner is in custody since 21.03.2009. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, this petition is allowed. Accordingly, let the sole petitioner, namely, Dinesh Kumar Rai be 2 enlarged on bail on executing bail bond of Rs.10,000.00 (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj, in connection with Thawey P.S. Case No. 25/2009. MPS/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )