IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.688 of 2010 1. PHUL SUNDER DEVI W/O AWADHESH KUMAR SHARMA, D/O JAGDISH SINGH R/O VILL BICHIYAON, P.S SANDESH, DISTT- BHOJPUR AT PRESENT R/O VILL- CHAURI, P.S CHAURI, DISTT- BHOJPUR. 2. USHA DEVI W/O MUKTI NARAIN RAI, D/O JAGDISH SINGH R/O VILL- BICHIYAON, P.S- SANDESH, DISTT- BHOJPUR, AT PRESENT R/O VILL- DHANCHUHAN, P.S CHAURI, DISTT- BHOJPUR. … PLAINTIFFS/ PETITIONERS. VERSUS 1. JAGDISH SINGH S/O LATE SHEO LAKHAN SINGH R/O VILL- BICHIYAON, P.S- SANDESH, DISTT- BHOJPUR. 2. SUNAINA DEVI W/O JALESHWAR SINGH VILL-BICHIYAON, P.S SANDESH, DISTT- BHOJPUR AT PRESENT R/O VILL- BARAH, P.S- RANIA, TALAB, DISTT- PATNA. 3. BIDYANTI DEVI W/O VIJAY KUMAR SINGH VILL- BICHIYAON, P.S SANDESH, DISTT- BHOJPUR AT PRESENT R/O VILL- KURMURI, P.S- SIKARAHATTA, DISTT- BHOJPUR. 4. SUNITA DEVI W/O MANOJ KUMR RAI VILL- BICHIYAON, P.S SANDESH, DISTT- BHOJPUR AT PRESENT R/O VILL BAGAR, P.S SIKARAHATTA, DISTT- BHOJPUR. 5. KESHAW PRASAD SINGH S/O LATE SHEO LAKHAN SINGH 6. ANIL SINGH S/O KESHAW PRASAD SINGH 7. KAMTA PRASAD SINGH S/O LATE RAM BILASH SINGH R/O VILL- BICHIYAON, P.S SANDESH, DISTT- BHOJPUR. 8. AWADHESH SINGH S/O KAMTA PRASAD SINGH R 9. BRAJ BHUSHAN SINGH S/O KAMTA PRASAD SINGH 10. SANJAY SINGH S/O KAMTA PRASAD SINGH R/O VILL- BICHIYAON, P.S SANDESH, DISTT- BHOJPUR 11. ANITA DEVI W/O HARERAM MISHRA D/O KAMTA PRASAD SINGH R/O VILL- BICHIYAON, P.S SANDESH, DISTT- BHOJPUR AT PRESENT R/O VILL SONBARSA, P.S SIKRAHATTA, DISTT- BHOJPUR. 12. BISNU DEO SINGH S/O LATE RAM BILASH SINGH. 13. SAILESH KUMAR SINGH S/O BISNUDEO SINGH. 14. SANJEEV KUMAR SINGH S/O BISNUDEO SINGH. ALL R/O VILL BICHIYAON, P.S SANDESH, DISTT- BHOJPUR. 15. UMRAVATI DEVI W/O NITYANAND PANDEY, D/O BISNUDEO SINGH R/O VILL BICHIYAON, P.S SANDESH, DISTT- BHOJPUR, AT PRESENT R/O VILL HARPUR, P.S CHARPOKHARI, DISTT- BHOJPUR. 16. MAMTA DEVI W/O SUNIL RAI, D/O BISNUDEO SINGH R/O VILL- BICHIYAON, P.S- SANDESH, DISTT- BHOJPUR, AT PRESENT R/O VILL- BETARI, P.S- CHARPOKHARI, DISTT- BHOJPUR. ......OPPOSITE PARTIES /RESPONDENTS. ----------- - 2 - 04/ 15.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. This petition has been filed for restoration of Civil Revision No.676 of 2009 which stood dismissed for default against opposite parties nos. 6, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 13 to 16 due to non- compliance of the order of this court dated 08.07.2009 and accordingly this court vide order dated 17.08.2009 held that the entire civil revision has become incompetent due to dismissal of the civil revision against some persons as the case had arisen out of partition suit. Considering the averments made by learned counsel for the petitioners and the statements made in this petition, it appears that genuine reasons have been shown which prevented the petitioners from complying the said order of this court dated 08.07.2009. In the said circumstances, this petition is allowed, order dated 17.08.2009 is recalled and Civil Revision No.676 of 2009 is restored to its original file and number. However, this order will be subject to compliance of order dated 08.07.2009 fully by tomorrow. Sunil (S. N. Hussain, J.)