1. ^ ^ IN T±)E HLGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR Writ'Petition No. __ __4_°&3 _ /2004 Writ petition Under Article 226(2) of _Lhe Conslitytion of Lndja._ '-'&i's PETITIONER ^•^.^:.. .^•u.^"...-••" ^y^ ^yy^" ^^€^' >^.<^^"" ^^~ '^' o^ RESPONDENTS:: 1 \ »••',•!'. 'S ^'^fl. ^i.iItesF-'4 p'l\ M/s Kanker Roadways, a partngrship firm, through the Partner Shri Preetam Singh Garcha, near Gandhi Udyan, Civjl Lines, Raipur (CG). Versus The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Transport, D.K. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). TheState Transport Autli&rity Rajpur (CG). The State of Madhya Pradesh, through the Secretary, Transport Department, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.). The State Trasport Authority, Moti Mahal, Gwalior (CG). Particulars of the petitioner: As'-given in the cause title. EartlcyLar^ ofthe respondents : As given in the cause title. ^r^'F*^IP»«?"^^:^S ,;•rsT'.-.fm,i-Kl"^;:^!;';';'-;":^.^^,^.';^'?;; .:''5'^?T'Se!3S?'^S^37-r.";"^ .:"'"^S';T/,'••' '.^:''.- '^••^-sS'SSSiS' F ^-Sf ^i|q!^i<4, ^fll-'-l'fS', T^'IRTy fcO.^.^O.S6 11 ^^2Q£ •q'W (1rtiTC'4) 'r .10 10 7 ..ss^ws ^ssssgV»9Si ;ma 13.1.2 Sht-i B.K. Rawat, counsei for 4ie petitioner. Shri Pramod Kumar Verma/IAdditJonal Advocate &enersl for the State/respondents No.l and 2. j 1 Shri Rsjeev Shrivostava, courjsei for respondents No.3 ssnd 4, &s a'lSO ! . for interyener - Madhya Pradesh Road Transport CorporaTlon. Learned counsel for the ofetttioner submits that the Term of temporary' per'init has aiready b^e.i expired snd thereafter, another temporary permit was granted to fhe peTitioner, and on That the Stste ^ Transport Authority, Swalior, haa alteady counter'sianed, therefore, tc that 1 exrent this .writ petition has becoijne infrucTuous. As far as The prayer r'egardina issuance of writ of mand^mu^ for direeting the part'ies to en-i-er into reciurocai' aar'eemenT is conce^'ned, iearned counsei submlts thal- in rscent •i'imes, the State of Modhya Pi-adesh hGS tsken u deci.sion to aboiish 1 the Madhya Pradesh Road TranspolT Corporation, therefore, ieavina this queation open he does not want to pt^ss this writ petition, at thid stage. In view of the submissions made by learned counsei for The petitioner, the petition stands dispo^ed of. Consequently. M.(W.)P.No.44S2/2004 and I.A.No.9715/2004 aiso stand disposed of. Sd/- L-C. Bhadoo Judge -FS/35C;—12/2QGO—-50,QOO. .-^ -%'' %»^w y;'.- •'y'