IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 15TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 24TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 30364 of 2011(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. AMAL.T.J., THOZHUTHUNGAL HOUSE, JANATHA ROAD, N. PARAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. LAIBISH.K.B., KUMMAPPILLY VEEDU, NANTHIATTUKUNNAM, N. PARAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. VINEETH.P.K., CHITHIRA, PALACE GARDEN, KARINGACHIRA, IRIMBANAM P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. VISHNU GOPINATH MENON, LAKSHMI, PRIYADHARSHINI NAGAR, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.V.MADHUSUDHANAN RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT-673 636. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT-673 636. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.30364/11 APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 8.11.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 8.11.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 8.11.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 8.11.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER. EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 8.11.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE 4TH PETITIONER. EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN DATED 8.11.2011. EXT.P7 TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN DATED 8.11.2011. EXT.P8 TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN DATED 8.11.2011. EXT.P9 TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN DATED 8.11.2011. EXT.P10 TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN DATED 8.11.2011. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 30364 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 15th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners are B.Tech students. When the result of the 4th Semester examination was declared, petitioners failed in different subjects. They applied for revaluation as per Exts.P2 to P5 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 1st petitioner also submitted application for revaluation of answer sheets of the respective subjects of 1st and 2nd semester supplementary examination as per Ext.P1. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the University for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp