THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.546 OF 2007 ORAL ORDER: On the face of it, the matter does not involve enforcement of any legal right or statutory obligation. The dispute raised apparently is a civil dispute between the petitioner and the 4th respondent. Hence, the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, cannot be maintained. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. However, this shall not preclude the petitioner to work out appropriate common law remedy, if he so chooses. __________ (G. ROHINI). 5th January, 2006. Issue CC by today. Kgr THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.546 OF 2007 5th January, 2007. Between: Burra Satyaveni. .. Petitioner. And The Commissioner, Prohibition and Excise Department, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and another. .. Respondents.