IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD DATE.24-02-2011. PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G. KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.36 OF 2007 Between: Gogula Nagesh. --- Appellant/ Applicant. AND The Union of India, Rep. by its General Manager South Central Railway, Secunderabad. --- Respondent/ Respondent. The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G. KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.36 OF 2007 JUDGEMENT: It is the contention of learned counsel for applicant that as per the case sheet pertaining to the applicant, the deceased received injuries in a train accident and it is also stated therein that he received the injuries by means of a road traffic accident whereas mainly on the basis of later circumstance, the Tribunal dismissed the application and further he has requested the Court to remand the matter to adduce necessary evidence in this context. 2. In the interest of justice, it is necessary to see that the said discrepancy is clarified by examining concerned doctor and concerned other persons. 3. In the result, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is allowed and the order passed by the Tribunal is set aside and the matter is remanded to the Tribunal to give an opportunity to the applicant to examine concerned doctor or any other medical authority with reference to particularly the case sheet of the applicant and then give an opportunity to the respondent to adduce further evidence and dispose of the matter afresh basing upon the material available then. No costs. ___________________________ G. KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY, J Dated: 24-02-2011. Dsh.