IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5827 of 2009 SIDHESHWAR PRASAD Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 18.02.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner has no concern with the differences in between the wife and husband, for which he has been involved in this case. Even then he remained in custody since 26.12.2008. So his further incarceration is not justified. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Complaint Case no. 331 of 2007. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)