1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR First Appeal No. 169 of 1989 Ravi Shankar s/o Sita Ram Tiwari ...Versus... Union of India & anr. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. None present for the appellant. Mr. M.P. Badar Advocate for Respondent no.2. …. CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 09.06.2011. When the appeal was admitted on 20.6.1989, an advocate represented the appellant. Thereafter order was passed on 26.8.1992 asking the office to inform the appellant about the date of hearing of the appeal, pursuant to which office report shows that the appellant is not residing on the given address and therefore notice was not served. On 11.4.2011 again the office has made similar report pursuant to the order made by the registrar on 13.2.2004 to serve the appellant. To sum up, the appellant is not residing on the address given by him and the appeal is pending since 1989. Mr.Badar appears for respondent no.2. In the above fact situation, there is no alternative except to dismiss the present 2 appeal for want of prosecution. Hence, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Judge /TA/