d.^ 1^^-— n S) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S.)NO. ^2^/j /2Q10 PETITIONER: Smt. Parwati Patel W/o Keshar Lal Patel, Aged about 36 years, Assistant Teacher Primary School Basanajhar, Block Kharsia District-Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPQNDENTS ^ ./^ ^'\ ^ ^^:^ ^Sf^> ./^ ^'\ ^ \^^. ^%€^ ^ ^' ^- ^^"' . 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^' 2. The Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 3. The District Education Officer Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) ^4) The Blcok Education Officer, Block Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC. <nwii ^»»<i^ '3^ ^II^IKn^, ^Tii<rl4i^ f^TRTy ..^.•.?.Ly..^^LOM^.?.. ^TT^T ^?F (^351^q) 311^1 "^T ^i<=b WT 3?T^T sb*iicy> Tumane i^cnw^f^r^?? SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivhstwa. J loner. 05-08-2010 Shri D. R. Patel, counsel for the petit Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Panel advance copy. Heard. Learned counsel appearing for the p|£ entitled to benefit of fcA/o advance incremerlts B. T. I. examination before her appointmen| the issue involved in the present petition is| has been finally decided by the Hon'ble Saxena vs» State ofM.P. & Ors., 2009 passed by this Court in the case of Yashw^nt Corporatson, Dwg & anather 2006 (2) tht's Court has also taken a similar view in Hi W.P.(S)No.3250of2010. On the other hand, submission of 1| State is that this petition has been filed with( Government He prays that ifthe petitioner \^ou will be considered on its own merrts and in ft^ In this view of the matter, 1 am not ink stage. tt would be open for the petitioner te^ making appropriate representation, claimin^ orders referred to above. In case such repre^entation decide the same in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the e|bl^Id4l4 ^TR^f ^ fe^st <?^^l< ^3;tRTH3?1^ La\j/yer for the State/respondents on stitioner submits that the petitioner is on account of she having passed at her own cost It is submitted that no longer res integra and the same ^upreme Court in the case of Asha MPJR (SC) 59 as atso the orders Kumar Bhareiwaj vs. Municipsl MF\JR-CG 9S. It is further submitted that |is order dated 06-07-2010 passed in sarned counsel for the respondents- [»utmaking any approach to the State \^ould make representation, the same (ccordance with taw. ^lined to entertain tiiis petition atthis approach the State Government by parity of treatment on the basis of ^entation is made, respondents shat! ^etition stands disposed of. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^rra^r ^hJ^r^rT^^, .^R'hFrR —FS/147—2/2010 —1,00,000.