1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.361 OF 1998 WRIT PETITION NO.361 OF 1998 WRIT PETITION NO.361 OF 1998 All India Meat & Livestock Exporters Association & Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. Municipal Corpn. of Greater Bombay & Ors. ..Respondents ----- Mr.P.A.Sawant i/b. Legal COnsultants for Petitioners Mr.Vinod Mahadik for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 Ms.M.Kajale, A.G.P. for Respondent No.4 CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. DATE: 3RD MAY, 2005. DATE: 3RD MAY, 2005. DATE: 3RD MAY, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. . On behalf of the Petitioner learned Counsel points out that the Petition is seeking to challenge byelaws No.1 in Chapter IV, which if literally read, means . A slaughter house was established for slaughter of animals for human food for consumption in Greater Mumbai. . Petition was filed in the year 1998. Between 1985 and 1998 and till today Petitioners also export meat of animals slaughtered at the slaughter house. In other words Respondent Corporation itself has not read byelaw 1, in Chapter IV as mandatory considering that meat of animals slaughtered is being exported. 2 . Considering the above, learned Counsel seeks leave to withdraw the Petition with liberty to file fresh petition if there be a cause of action. . Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. No order as to costs. (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (S.P. KUKDAY,J.) (S.P. KUKDAY,J.) (S.P. KUKDAY,J.)