Crl.M.No.M-29863 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-29863 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 26, 2010 Dharam Singh and another .....Petitioners v. The State of Haryana and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Rahul Vats, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.M.Anand, Addl.A.G., Haryana. Mr.B.S.Dhillon, Advocate for respondent no.2. ....... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in Complaint case No.169/1 of 29.7.2006, registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 506, 120-B IPC, pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Panchkula. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully. This Court while issuing notice of motion on 8.10.2010, passed the following order: “Crl.M.No.53402 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-29863 of 2010 Contends that bailable warrants against the petitioners have been issued by learned trial Court for offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 read with Sections 120-B IPC and 506 IPC. Further contends that as the offences are non-bailable, they are apprehending that they may be taken into custody by learned trial Court. Crl.M.No.M-29863 of 2010 (O&M) -2- Notice of motion for 10.11.2010. In the meantime, petitioners are directed to appear before learned trial Court within two weeks from today and in case they so appear and apply for regular bail, they be admitted to interim bail by learned trial Court subject to any conditions that may deem to be imposed by it.” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that pursuant to the said order, the petitioners have already appeared before learned trial Court and admitted to interim bail vide order dated 14.10.2010. It has been further stated that petitioners undertake to appear before learned trial Court and face trial. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioners are likely to abscond or that they are likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. In view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, order dated 8.10.2010, granting interim bail to petitioners-Dharam Singh and Jasbir Singh, is, hereby made absolute subject to any conditions that may deem to be imposed by learned trial Court. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. 26.11.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge