IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.20 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.38 OF 2009 M/s. Soleri Land Development Pvt.Ltd. ... Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra and others. ... Respondents And Parul Enterprises Through S.L. Raval C.A. of C.D. Shah (H.U.F.) ... Applicant Mr. Chetan Sharma with Mr. Vaibhav Krishna and Ms. Ramni Taneja i/by M/s. Juris Consillis for the petitioner. Mr. G.D. Utangale i/by M/s. Utangale & Co. for the SRA. Mr. Atul Rajadhyaksha with Mr. R.M. Patne and Mr. Kedar Wagle for the respondent No.3. Mr. K.K. Singhvi, Senior Advocate with Ms. A.R. Joshi for the BMC. Mr. D.A. Nalawade, Government Pleader for the State. Mr. P.N. Misra with Mr. D. Brijesh i/by M/s. D. Brijesh- Parul Enterprises. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 6TH APRIL, 2009 P.C.: There is no opposition. Without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties, the chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). The applicant is ordered to be impleaded as party respondent to the writ petition. Chamber summons is, accordingly, disposed of. 2. There is also no objection for impleadment of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation as party respondent to the writ petition. This request is also allowed. Let the necessary amendment be carried out in the writ petition and amended memo be filed within one week from today. CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.