IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 31ST MARCH 2008 / 11TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 10747 of 2008(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- K.T.JOSEPH, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O.THOMAS, KANIKARA HOUSE, VEROOR MURI, CHETHIPUZHA VILLAGE, CHANGANACHERRY, KOTTAYAM DIST. REP. BY P/A HOLDER SHIBU.K., S/O.DEVASSIA THOMAS, KANIKKARA HOUSE, THRIKODITHANAM VILLAGE, KODINATTUMKUNNU, CHANGANASSERY TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM, CIVIL STATION, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, CHANGANASSERY, P.O.CHANGANASSERY, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, CHETHIPUZHA VILLAGE, CHANGANASSERY TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 4. THOMAS, S/O.DEVASSIA, KANIKARA HOUSE, VEROOR MURI, CHETHIPUZHA VILLAGE, CHANGANACHERRY TALUK NOW RESIDING AT INDUSTRIAL ESTATE AREA, VEROOR MURI, CHETHIPUZHA VILLAGE, CHANGANASSERY TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 5. THRESSIAMMA, W/O.THOMAS, KANIKARA HOUSE, VEROOR MURI, CHETHIPUZHA VILLAGE, CHANGANACHERRY TALUK NOW RESIDING AT INDUSTRIAL ESTATE AREA, VEROOR MURI, CHETHIPUZHA VILLAGE, CHANGANASSERY TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 6. THE SUB REGISTRAR, SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE, CHANGANASSERY, CHANGANASSERY P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 10747 OF 2008 D ==================== Dated this the 31st day of March, 2008 J U D G M E N T This writ petition discloses the story of an ongoing litigation between the petitioner on one side and the respondents 4 and 5, who are none other than his parents, on the other side. The dispute concerns the property covered by Ext.P1 gift deed executed by his aforesaid parents in favour of the petitioner, which is stated to have been revoked at a later point of time. This controversy is now pending consideration of the Munsiff's Court, Changanacherry in OS Nos.201/07 and 333/07 filed by both parties. 2. The immediate cause for filing this writ petition is the information that the petitioner got that the 2nd respondent has effected mutation of the property in favour of the parents following Ext.P8 notice that was issued. It is stated that the petitioner has applied for a copy of the said order by submitting Ext.P10 and even that has not been issued to him. In this background writ petition is filed praying for a direction not to take further action on the mutation that is stated to have been effected. 3. Since the dispute between the parties is essentially a civil WPC 10747/08 :2 : dispute and that the competent Civil Court has seized of the same, I am not inclined to pass the order as sought for. However, that does not mean that the petitioner should not be issued a copy of the order if any passed following Ext.P8 notice on the application made by the respondents 4 and 5 for effecting mutation in their name. 4. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of directing that the 2nd respondent shall issue the petitioner a copy of the order stated to have been passed following Ext.P8. This the respondents shall do within ten days of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp