In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh … COCP No. 614 of 2009 Date of decision: July 21,2009 Harbinder Kaur wife of Satpal Singh ..Petitioner. Versus Bihari Lal and another ..Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg Present: Mr. Nandan Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Amit Sethi, Advocate for the respondents .. Rakesh Kumar Garg,J(Oral) Reply by way of affidavit on behalf of respondent No.2 has been filed and the same is taken on the record. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that in pursuance of the speaking order Annexure P-1 passed by the respondents, the payment of the retiral benefits has been released to the petitioner. However, the petitioner is also entitled to interest as the retiral benefits have been paid after a considerable delay. From perusal of the order dated 9.12.2008 passed by this Court in CWP No.20690 of 2008, no benefit of interest was granted to the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid fact, I am not inclined to proceed further in the matter. Rule discharged. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek any other appropriate remedy for redresssal of her grievance for payment of interest of delayed payment of retiral benefits in accordance with law. July 21, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) nk JUDGE`