1 NMS-3694-10.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3694 OF 2010 IN APPEAL (L) NO.914 OF 2010 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2794 OF 2010 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.155 OF 2009 Pradeep Kumar Saraf and anr. ..Appellant Vs M/s.Global Trade Finance Ltd. ..Respondent -- Mr.A.V.Doijode, for appellants. Mr.Cyrus Ardeshir with Mr.Rajesh Talekar i/b.K.Ashar & Co., for respondent. -- CORAM : D.K.DESHMUKH & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE : 12 th JULY, 2011 P.C: For the reasons disclosed in the affidavit in support of the Motion, the Motion is granted in terms of prayer clause (a). [R.G.KETKAR, J.] [D.K.DESHMUKH, J.] 2 NMS-3694-10.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL (L) NO.914 OF 2010 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2794 OF 2010 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.155 OF 2009 Pradeep Kumar Saraf and anr. ..Appellant Vs M/s.Global Trade Finance Ltd. ..Respondent -- Mr.A.V.Doijode, for appellants. Mr.Cyrus Ardeshir with Mr.Rajesh Talekar i/b.K.Ashar & Co., for respondent. -- CORAM : D.K.DESHMUKH & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE : 12 th JULY, 2011 P.C: Admittedly, the appellant was served with Summons for judgment. In the affidavit filed in support of the Motion for setting aside ex-parte decree, there is no explaination why after receiving Summons for Judgment, affidavit seeking leave of the Court to defend the suit was not filed. In this view of the matter, there is no reason to interfere with the order. Appeal is rejected. [R.G.KETKAR, J.] [D.K.DESHMUKH, J.]