1 wp 9347.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9347 OF 2011 Suman Baburao Dhanwate (Wadar) .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri C. V. Thombre, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri K. B. Choudhari, Addl.G.P. for the Respondent No. 1. Shri S. V. Deshmukh, Advocate h/f Shri S. T. Shelke, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2 and 3. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 02ND DECEMBER, 2011. PER COURT : . Heard Shri C. V. Thombre, the learned counsel for the petitioner. The nomination paper of the petitioner is rejected for non submission of caste validity certificate along with nomination form. Shri Thombre, the learned counsel submits that, it was not the fault of the petitioner. As the petitioner did not receive the caste validity certificate on the date of filing of nomination, the petitioner could not submit the same along with the nomination form. But subsequently on the day of scrutiny 2 wp 9347.11 the same was available. A very hyper technical approach has been taken by the authorities. 2. The said issue is no longer res-integra in view of the judgment of Division Bench of this Court in a case of Bipinchandra Shahurao Thombre and others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others reported in 2010 (2) Bom. C. R. 656. So also another judgment of Division Bench of this Court in a case of Savita Vs. State of Maharashtra in Writ Petition No. 8778/2011. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed, however, with no order as to costs. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/Dec. 11