1 Revptn-105.09 Ash IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 105 OF 2009 Baburao Maruti Ingawale & Others. .. Petitioners Vs State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents -- Shri P.J. Thorat i/by Shri R.A. Thorat for the Petitioners. Shri R.M. Patne, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 4. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 19TH OCTOBER, 2010 P.C: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the Review Petitioner. The submission of the Review Petitioner is that this Court ought to have considered the very important aspect that the deceased-original Petitioner had only 1/3rd share in the land bearing Gat No.64. He submitted that while dealing with the proposal of the original Petitioner which is recorded in the order under review, it is held that Gat No.64 is not exclusively owned by the original Petitioner. 2. Perusal of the order dated 12th September, 2006 shows that the only submission made was on the basis of the proposal of the original Petitioner by which he offered land bearing Gat No.64 for acquisition. In the context of the said offer, this Court has observed that the original 2 Revptn-105.09 Petitioner should have the title to the land which he had offered to the Government for acquisition and that the original Petitioner could not offer a property which does not belong to him or in which others are disputing his claim. 3. There is no error apparent on the face of record. There is no ground for review. Review Petition is rejected. 4. On the prayer made by the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner, ad-interim relief of status quo will continue to operate for a period of 12 weeks from today. (A.S.OKA, J)