IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10752 of 2007 JAYANTI DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2/ 23-Sep-08 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. It has been submitted that the Anganbari Sevika selected vide Annexure-1, Renu Nandan, Respondent No.11 is not a resident of the locality where the beneficiaries are residing and the Anganbari Sahaika (not a Respondent) is related to the Anganbari Sevika. The requirement of ordinarily being resident of the local area where the beneficiaries are situated is a question of fact which this Court would not like to decide at the first instance. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner that if so advised she may first approach the Sub Divisional Officer, Mahua (Vaishali), Respondent No.7 in this matter who will look into the grievance of the petitioner and take appropriate action or recommend the proper authority for action in accordance with law. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)