IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26222 of 2009 SUJIT KUMAR SRIVASTAV SON OF BHUNESHWAR PRASAD SRIVASTAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KHADALPURA, P.S. BIHTA, DISTRICT PATNA. Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2/ 01-09-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Petitioner is in custody since 29.07.2008 and the complaint Case No. 1016 © of 2006 was instituted under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, read with section 4 of the D.P.Act. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is still ready and willing to keep his wife with him but from the impugned order passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge it is apparent that the petitioner has remarried and in that view of the matter his wife refused the offer of reconciliation. There is categorical denial about this allegation of remarriage by the petitioner. Since the petitioner is still ready and willing to keep his wife with him and is ready to face the trial as also keeping in mind that the petitioner is very serious about reconciliation, let the petitioner, namely, Sujit Kumar Srivastav, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Danapur in Complaint Case No. 1016 ( C ) of 2006. ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J ) BTiwary/