IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1763 of 2006 HARENDRA RAM Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ----------- 04. 04/08/2008 Petitioner is aggrieved because the respondents have held review medical examination after his so-called selection for appointment on the post of constable (general duty) under S.S.B. It is not in dispute that medical examination was held on the petitioner and the medical officer found many physical infirmities which would be evident from perusal of annexure-3. But review medical examination was held and in the said examination in so far as the vision of the petitioner is concerned the same was not found to be in consonance with the requirement of having a normal vision 6/6. If the review medical board in this regard was in agreement on one issue with the initial medical held, there is no occasion for the respondents to offer appointment to the petitioner. The Court does not find any reason to interfere with the decision of the respondents of not offering appointment to the petitioner. The writ application is dismissed. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)