^l O-o -1- ") IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISHGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. Petitioner ... ... \^^ ^ss:- - w ^•'.^ ^''" /~x> ^;;".^' ^^ ^ RespondentS W.P. (S) No. ^73) 2008Slrggl@ Khemlal Sahu, aged 45 years, Son ofShri Anuj Ram Sahu, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Surpa, Block Patan and Tahsil Patan District Durg (C.G.) Versus 1. StateGovemmentofChhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, .0^: . ^ ^^>-/' •</ C?/ ^^ School Education Department, ^\y D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) w .^^ 2. District Education Officer, Durg (C.G.) Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of mandamus/direction or anv other aDDropriate writ HJGilCpURT_OF_C_HHATTjSGARH__LB§LASPU,R PETIT10NER WRJT PETITION.(S) N0. 5731 OF 20C Khemla! Sahu RESPONDENTS Versus Government crf Chhattisgarh & Another (VVrlt Petition under Articie 226 ofthe Constltytion of India) Slngie Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnlhotri, J. Present :• Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the pet.itloner. Shrl A.V.Sridhar, Panei Lawyerforihe (Passed on this 23rc day of March, 2010) 1. The State/respondents In its return 24-2-2010 have categoricaily stated that appropriate wouid be affording an opporlunlty of hearing to the petltloner the present petltlon may be of in the same terms as per the order passsd by this Court in %L. v. Government of C-hhattlsgam &AnQther . 2. !n view of the above categoricai by the State, according to learned counsel for the petitioner nothlng survives In thls petltion for adjudicatjon. 3. Accordlngiy, the writ petition is of in terms of tiie decision ofthis Court rendered in R,L. (sypra). ^^ Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 11 - ! WP (S) No.6490 of 08 (deoided on 26-2-2009).