WP(C) 3597/2008 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY The petitioner is a dropped teacher of Baropara Girls’ M.E. School of Karimganj District and had approached this Court as his name was excluded from the list of dropped teachers (Annexure-11), notified by the Deputy Secretary to the Govt. o f Assam, Education (Elementary) Department. 2. In the counter affidavit filed by the Secretary to the Govt. of Assam on 27.11.08, it is reflected that in pursuant to the direction given by this Court in Civil Rule No. 1571/98 and WP(C) No. 3976/05, the cases of the dropped teach ers were scrutinized by the Screening Committee constituted by the High Power Co mmittee. According to the Departmental authorities,, the petitioner’s case was n ot recommended because of non-availability of necessary service details of the p etitioner. The relevant averments in the counter affidavit are extracted here-in-below for ready reference :- That the deponent begs to state that the grievances of the petitioner had been scrutinized by the Screening Committee constituted by the High Power Committee p ursuant to the Hon’ble Court’s direction. The petitioner has been working as Ass amese Language teacher in Baropara Girls’ M.E. School under Karimganj District. As per the report of the High Power Committee, at serial No.10, Page No. 208 the case of the petitioner was not recommended on the ground of non-availability of detail particulars, such as list of teaching and non-teaching staff of the scho ol, date of joining, date of provincialisation, enrolment etc. Her case will be again processed after obtaining report from DEEO, Karimganj and place the same before the High Power Committee in its next meeting. 3. In view of the above stand of the State respondents, Mr. F.U. Borbhuya, learned counsel submits that the petitioner’s case may be placed for re-consider ation by the Committee along with all his required service particulars. 4. Mr. UK Goswami, learned standing counsel submits that the High Power Com mittee appointed to consider the claims of the dropped teachers, is even now fun ctioning and if direction is issued, the said Committee can once again look into the petitioner’s grievances. 5. In view of above, the petitioner is permitted to file a representation b efore the Commissioner & Secretary, Govt. of Assam, Education (Elementary) Depar tment along with all necessary information. The Commissioner may thereafter faci litate consideration of the petitioner’s claim for regularisation as a dropped t eacher, by the competent Committee. Since the matter is already delayed, the pet itioner’s case be placed for consideration without any further delay and prefera bly in the next meeting of the Committee. The decision shall naturally be taken on merit of the case. 6. The case is disposed of with the above direction.