: 1 : crr-181-10=.sxw USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COURT RECEIVER’S REPORT NO. 181 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO. 1711 OF 2008 Victory Auto Works .. Plaintiff v/s. Firdosh Minocher Homavazir .. Defendant ......... Mr. Satish Shetye i/by Prakash & Co. for plaintiff Mr. Vijay Parelkar, M/s Parelkar & Dallas Architect and Valuer in person. Mr. R.M. Vanoo for the defendant. Mr. G.G. Ketkar, 1st Asstt. to Court Receiver. ......... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 12th OCTOBER, 2010 P.C. : 1. Parties are free to dispute as to who shall bear the Architect expenses. For the time being, from the monies which are lying with the Receiver, bill of the Architect has to be paid. Accordingly, Receiver has to pay to the Architect Rs.81,061/-. Hence, Receiver to pay to the Architect his final bill of Rs. 81,061/-. A note is taken that plaintiffs have deposited with Receiver Rs. 15,000/- towards fees of the Architect. As to how the parties shall share the Architect’s bill is left open. This order be complied with by the Receiver within 7 days from today. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)