IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1435 of 2007 1. JAGDISH SAHANI , 2. Rup Lal Sahni Both are sons of Mathura Sahani, R/o Village-Sarogarhi Tola, Sarsawa, P.S. Dhaka, District- East Champaran … Petitioners. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Rameshwar Sahani, S/o Sri Bhagawan Sahani, R/o Village-Sarsawa, P.S.-Chiraiya, District-East Champaran .......Opposite Parties. For the petitioners: Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, A.P.P. ----------- 4 30-06-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Petitioners assail the judgment and order of conviction dated 18th January, 1999 recorded by the learned trial court (Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Sikrahana at Motihari) in T.R. No. 519/98 whereby petitioner no. 1 was held guilty of offence punishable under sections 324 and 379 IPC whereas petitioner no. 2 has been held guilty of offence punishable under sections 323 and 379 IPC. They were however, given benefit of provisions as contained in Sections 3 and 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). Petitioner no. 1 was released on execution of probation bond under Section 4 of the Act for keeping peace and good behaviour for a period of one year. Petitioner No. 2 was released after due admonition under section 3 of the Act. The matter appears to be carried in appeal which was disposed of by a judgment dated 25th May, 2007. Learned 2 Appellate Court found adequate justification for not interfering with the order releasing the petitioners under the said Act. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners, this court is satisfied that the orders impugned need no interference. The application is accordingly dismissed. Sujit (Kishore K.Mandal,J)