1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2104 OF 2009 Vishwanath Dattu Sul ... Petitioner v/s State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents Mr.M.A.Utagikar for the petitioner. Mr.A.I.Patel, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr.V.S.Talkute for respondent Nos.4 and 5. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 24TH JUNE, 2009 P.C.: 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the Deputy Director, City Survey Office, Pune Division i.e. Respondent No.2, by which order the petitioner’s application for deleting the names of respondent Nos.4 and 5 from City Survey No.248 has been rejected. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have found that City Survey No.248 was part of Plot No.167 which was divided into 3 plots being 246, 248 and 2 249. On this basis the authorities below have rejected the application of the petitioner and held that the petitioner cannot contend that he has any right over the Survey No.248 for egress and ingress to his property which was Survey No.247. 2. In my view, there is no need to interfere with these orders passed. If at all the petitioner has any easementary right in respect of Survey No.248 as claimed by him, that will have to be decided by the Civil Court. 3. Writ petition rejected. ..... 3