CiMffj ? RFNFH ^l.i^-^i..-^' ^^^^^s s <$ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S)NO. 32.63 / 2010 .a**' PETITIONER .^^y ^i^y .•••';^'7g^e''- / .o... •,s« RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. ..^ /^' s^ •^ \ '^- ,^^l%t *";..rfil n- * e ^O^T^! .•t-' .•''••. -/:'' -4 A^' •^ / 2. 3. „& ^\^ ^y^ \t^' jj f^'.". y *- iip^' C?!r*' Frances Lakda s/o. Sheel Baush Kalda, aged about 38 years, R/o. Village and Post Singi Bahar (Jatatoli), Tahsil Farsabahar, P.S. Tapkara, District Jashpur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through:- Secretary, Department of Home, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director General of Police, Police Headquarters, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Inspector General of Police, Bilaspur Range, Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Superintendent of Police, Anuppur (C.G.) 5. Superintendent of Police, Bilaspur (C.G.) Union of India, through the Secretary, Public Grievances Cell, •f &«wiil Lok Nayak Bj]awaaJ<han Market, New Delhi. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA r' -HC—78 ^fc 'S^t -^Wv\t\, ®Ti1'M'IS,l^tfl'My -....U£.CS2...^:..2^^.^ snt^l 'SKI (<;-fi+ WTSn^TWTO' PcEWeeai ?IHlti (' TCTW^ftasn^T SB: Hon'ble Shri Maniadra Moftan Shiivastava, J. 09.7.2010 Miss Naushina Ali, counse Mr. Viuod Tekam. Pauel by orderwith regard to payinent appeal/representation has been petitioner on 10.10.2008 placed tiU date, the same has uot receivc Learaed counsel for the rt qnqferih 'iTOcfi 'sf fet;t tfSi^R •^; siRn an^t for the pctitioner. ,awyer for the State/respondents, on advaace copy. Heard, Subimssion ofleamed coutisel for fhe petitioner is fhat aggrieved of salaiy for fhe period in dispute, an preferred to fhe Govenuaent by the on record as Annexure P-6. However, d aay consideration. |spondents subinits that tius petition inay be disposed offwith directio^i to decide fhe same. Accordingly, it»directed 4iat appeal/representation filed by fhe petitioner on 10.10.2008 (Ajunexi|ire P-6) before respondent No.l, shall be considered aad decided expejditiously, wittun au outer tmiit of 3 laonths from. the date of receipt oj In case grievauce of tii^ redressed, it wiU. be open for th^ disnosed ofiF. copy of fhis order. petitioner stiU reniains aad un- petitioner to take recourse to such reinedy as niay bc available to hJTfi uader fhe law. It is made clear that fhis C4urt has not expressed any opinion on fhe nierits of the case. With fhe aforesaid obser^ations, the petition staads fiaaUy Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge k