SUIT 2084-10 YBG 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.2084 OF 2010 Anchor Health and Beautycare Pvt.Ltd. .. Plaintiffs Versus Vijay Chandrakant Desai and Ors. .. Defendants Mr.Vinod Bhagar with Punil Jani Dhiren Karanja, Suryank Rao i/b. G.S.Hegde and V.A.Bhagat for plaintiffs Mr.R.C.Makhija for defendants. CORAM : S.C.Dharmadhikari, J. Date : 26th August 2010. P.C. 1] Consent terms between the plaintiffs and defendants duly signed by the plaintiffs and their Advocates so also the defendants and their Advocates are tendered. 2] It is stated that the signatory on behalf of the plaintiffs has been duly authorised by the plaintiffs to sign and file these consent terms. Equally all the defendants are present in court. They have perused the SUIT 2084-10 YBG 2 consent terms and they state that the terms fully record the agreement between the parties. They are aware of the consequences of these terms being taken on record. Accordingly, the same are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. 3] They have without any pressure or force agreed to submit to a decree in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) of the plaint. Further, they have undertaken not to use the impugned trademark or any other mark deceptively similar to the plaintiffs' mark DIANA. 4] It is in such circumstances, defendants seek time to exhaust and dispose of the stock which plaintiffs are agreeable to give them. Accordingly time till 30th September 2010 is granted to defendants to dispose of and exhaust the stocks. 5] These consent terms can, therefore, be taken on record and particularly because I am satisfied that any order be passed in furtherence thereof will not be contrary to law or public policy. SUIT 2084-10 YBG 3 Accordingly order is passed in terms of consent terms. The suit is decreed accordingly. Undertakings in clauses 2, 6 and 7 are accepted. 6] In view of the consent terms all interim applications stand disposed of. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)