2906crn665.10.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUD ICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 665 OF 2010 (Pralhad Patilba Ware Vs. The State of Maharashtra) ........................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ........................................................................................................................................................................... Mr. P. B. Patil, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. D. P. Thakre, A.P.P. for the State. ....... CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATED : 29TH JUNE 2010 The application tendered to the Special Court, Washim by the applicant-accused requiring the prosecution to place on record certain documents has been turned down in view of the order dated 22/3/2010. The accused is being prosecuted for the offence punishable under the provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act in Special Case No. 08 of 2003. The recording of evidence in the matter is in progress. The applicant herein (original accused) presented the application requesting the Court to call for certain documents from the prosecution or from the custody of the complainant. The prosecution has opposed the application contending that such documents are not in their possession. The trial Court, therefore, proceeded to reject the application. The Counsel appearing for the applicant-accused contends that if the documents called for are not provided, it will be difficult to safeguard the interest of the accused. The prosecution has come out with a case that such a document is not in their possession and custody. In this view of the matter, it would be open for the applicant-accused to urge the Court to draw appropriate inference in the facts and circumstances of the case. Considering the interlocutory nature of the proceedings, it is not desirable to cause interference at this stage. The application is devoid of substance. Hence, the same is rejected. JUDGE wwl