IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 17783 of 2008 Between: N. Papa Rao S/o. Venkata Ramaiah R/o. Vidyut Colony, Near Saibaba Temple, Vijayawada, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER AND The Municipal Corporation of Vijayawada, rep. by its Commissioner, Vijayawada, Krishna District. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the inaction of the respondent in taking action against the construction of Three Storied Commercial Complex, without providing any required parking place as per the provisions of the Municipal Corporations Act though the petitioner along with other residents made several representations to the Respondent Corporation, as highly arbitrary, illegal and contrary to the provisions of the Municipal Corporations Act and direct the Respondent to take appropriate action by inspecting the said building and prevent the construction of the building with deviations and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.VENKATA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: SMT.G.JHANSI The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 17783 OF 2008 ORDER: 1. This writ petition has been filed by N. Papa Rao assailing the inaction of the respondent on his representation pointing out the construction being made in deviation of the sanctioned plan in Plot No. 15 owned by Sri D. Nageswara Rao. 2. When this writ petition came up for admission Smt. G.Jhansi learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent received notice. 3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent. 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent has not considered his representation dated 17-2-2008 wherein construction made in deviation of the sanctioned plan have been pointed out. 5. In view of the limited grievance of the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider the representation dated 17-2-2008 of the petitioner after putting on notice the affected parties and pass appropriate orders. 6. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _____________________________ Justice B.Seshasayana Reddy 14th August, 2008. KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 17783 OF 2008 14th August, 2008.