IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CLMA Delay Condonation Application No. 5045 of 2008 MCC Recall Application No. 934 of 2008 IN WPSS No. 849 of 2004 Chatar Lal Sah …………….Petitioner Versus State of Uttaranchal and others. ………..Respondents. Mr. Ravi Babulkar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 8th August, 2008 Hon’ble P.C.Verma, J. Perused the grounds shown for delay in filing the recall application. The reasons are satisfactory to condone the delay. Delay is condoned. Perused the grounds shown for recalling the order dated 17.6.2008. The reasons are satisfactory to recall the order dated 17.6.2008. Order dated 17.6.2008 is recalled. Both the applications are allowed. Writ petition is restored to its original number. Heard counsel for both the parties. Petitioner has an alternative remedy to approach the Public Service Tribunal for redressal of his grievance. The writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy and the petitioner is relegated to approach the Public Service Tribunal. Registry is directed to transmit the paper book of the case to Public Service Tribunal. (P.C. Verma, J.) 8.8.2008 Rathour