^iTTewrax" <S(X!'<q!41<t"l Coram : HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HCN'BLE SHR! SUNSL KUMAR SSNKA, J. 'E'lvfT^?! y^?l'""ri ^f^T TrTE!f '^^ — 1 T^STT '3Tf (ut^i'M'iie) gT?T ?t<a STOR ''35 37 cp^ snwur ?^ ^, w^is yi-^l^'i^ ^ftn i7Nf / fs- iTqy (.8'TCTra^T®) 3IWT l^ig' ^. +j^ f^PT 'Sg 42 '^'f ^sR ^rq, '5U^5T ^TT. ujl<i<7i, ^frS 'S^TCTT ^f (y><^i'«'lis) Wfs-S 'mW ^ ^RT i]'g ^R WSST ^JTEF?, ^ ^' 2 'S^OTCTTC WWT §T?T ysq wera''(TTO '»TER. 'TORTO clic'q!0) (ax-al'M^ss) Writ petition under Articte 226 ofthe Constitution of India Present: Shri Mateen Siddique, iearned counsel for the petitloner. Shri Bhishma Kinger, learned Standing counsel for respondent No.1. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General for respondent No. 2. (4th March, 2008) The following order of the Court was passed by tajeev Gupta, C.J. Heard iearned counsel for the parties. ^^ "\ I I propose to amend the writ petition by incorporating more prayers in the praver clause. 6. Since the main grievance of the petitioner in the writ petition has already been redressed by the declaration of the Chhattisgadi language as official language of the State, instead of permitting the petitioners to amend the writ petition, the petitioners are granted tiberty to file another writ petition for the surviving reliefs and other ancillary reliefs. 7. With the above liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of. 8. The security amount of Rs.5,000/- deposited by the petitioners be refunded to them. - —--— - . Sd/- Chief Justice 8d/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge subbu