In the Punjab and Haryana High Court, at Chandigarh. CRM-M- 5672 of 2011 Decided on July 27,2011 Sandeep @ Deny --Petitioner vs. The State of Haryana --Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.R.S Rai, Sr.Advocate, with Mr.D.S.Brar.Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Sagar Deswal, AAG, Haryana. Rakesh Kumar Jain,J:(Oral) This is a petition for regular bail pending trial under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short,'Cr.P.C.') in a case registered vide FIR No. 208 dated 27.07.2010 under Sections 323,326,307,34 IPC at Police Station Kotwali, District Faridabad. Allegation against the petitioner is that he had given knife blows on the abdomen of the injured/complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the medicolegal report, there are three wounds of 2cm x 1/2 cm but the depth of the injury is not mentioned as the doctor was not certain about the depth and had opined that it would be ascertained in the Operation Theatre. He further submits that these types of injuries cannot be said to be dangerous to life in order to bring the same within the definition of Section 307 IPC. In reply, learned counsel for the respondent submits that depth of the injuries has not been mentioned by the doctor but he has observed that the injuries suffered by the complainant on the abdomen were grievous and on the right side of the chest were dangerous to life. Learned CRM-M- 5672 of 2011 -2- counsel further submits that he is in custody since 28.7.2010. He is neither a previous convict nor any other case is pending against him. This fact is admitted by the learned State Counsel on instructions received from the Investigating Officer, who has admitted that there is no other case pending against the petitioner nor he is convicted in any case earlier. Learned counsel for the respondent, however, states that the complainant has already been examined. In view of the above, without observing anything on the merits of this case, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. July 27,2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge