IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.PADMANABHAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 21ST AUGUST 2007 / 30TH SRAVANA 1929 WP(C).No. 22193 of 2007(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ JACKSON JOSEPH, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O.T.C.JOSEPH, THANNILMATTATHIL HOUSE, NIRMALA COLLEGE ROAD, MUVATTUPUZHA P.O., ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.V.GOPIKRISHNA RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA STATE TRANSPORT PROJECT OFFICE, MUVATTUPUZHA. BY GOVT.PLEADER BENNY VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/08/2007 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS Ext.P1: True copy of the list of land schedule to be acquired. Ext.P2: True copy of the strip map/land plan Ext.P3: True copy of representation submitted by the petitioner before the 3rd respondent //True copy// es K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.22193 of 2007 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of August 2007 JUDGMENT When this writ petition comes up for hearing the learned Government Pleader on proper instructions submits that the writ petition is premature, as not even a notification under Section 4(1) of the L.A Act is published in respect of the property referred to in the writ petition. That submission is recorded and the writ petition is closed without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to seek appropriate relief, in case a notification is published under Section 4 (1) of the L.A. Act in respect of the property. K.PADMANABHAN NAIR,JUDGE es