IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.6821/2010 Ratan Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order : 28/07/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr. Harendra Singh for accused petitioner Mr. G.S.Rathore,Public Prosecutor for the State ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for the accused petitioner is that the vehicle in question was originally registered in the name of petitioner but subsequently, it was sold to one Lakki Gupta by way of an agreement to sell. Investigation carried out by the police also reveals that accused Mani Ram from whose possession the contraband was recovered while he was carrying the contraband in the vehicle, had borrowed the vehicle from Lakki, to whom the petitioner had sold it. Registration of the vehicle continued to remain in the name of the petitioner because the vehicle was hypothicated to the Finance Company and five installments were due to be paid and that being so the registration could not be transferred and NOC could not be obtained. In this back-ground learned counsel submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the present case and he has been falsely involved. There is no previous case pending against him. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail applications. Considering the rival submissions and without expressing any opinion on the merits of this case but taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail during trial. Resultantly, the bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Ratan Lal S/O Shri Hiralal Jain shall be released on bail in F.I.R. No. 174/2010 of P.S. Kekari, district Ajmer on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till conclusion of the trial. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. Thanvi