WP(C) 6266/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.P.KATAKEY Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner, by the present petition has prayed for a direction to th e respondent authorities to allow him to sit at the written test, scheduled to b e held for selection to the post of Junior Engineering Assistant(Boiler). By int erim order dated 25 November 2011, respondent Corporation was directed to allow the petitioner to sit at the written test and accordingly he sat at the written test held on 27 November 2011 and on being successful in such test, he was calle d for viva-voce test and accordingly he appeared and was placed at serial No.3 o n the list against two posts, out of which 1(one) post is reserved for the OBC c ategory candidate. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the respondent Cor poration, despite his selection, has refused to appoint him on the ground that h e having not applied for selection claiming any reservation, he is not entitled to the age relaxation available to a reserved category candidate. This position, however, has not been denied by Mr N Deka, learned Standing Counsel for the res pondent Corporation. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that since the claim of the petitioner in the present petition for allowing him to sit at the written test has already been allowed by interim order passed, the present petition may be treated as closed, giving liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court c hallenging the action of the respondent authorities of not giving the benefit of the age relaxation to a reserved category andidate on the ground that he has no t applied claiming any reservation. Prayer is allowed. The writ petition stands closed with liberty to the p etitioner, as prayed for.