( 1 ) ca14706.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14706 OF 2010 IN REVIEW APPLICATION ST. NO. 29912 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 367 OF 2009 Ashok Damodhar Pardeshi .. Applicant Versus Viththal Elaji Marathe .. Respondent Mr. B.R. Warma, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. H.V. Tungar h/f. Mr. C.R. Deshpande, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATED : 15.06.2011 P.C. :- 1. This review application cannot succeed because it is seeking mainly review of order passed by this Court on 12th April, 2010. The order dated 12th April, 2010 directed the applicant to deposit certain amount in the Lower Court and on that condition the applicant was to get an opportunity to lead evidence on certain issue. The order further mentioned that in case the amount is not deposited within eight weeks, the appeal itself would come to an end. Admittedly, the amount was not deposited within eight weeks and on 7th of June, 2010, the appeal automatically stood dismissed. In ( 2 ) ca14706.10 view of this self-operating order there is indeed no need of passing a separate order of dismissing the appeal. In view of that the office sent papers to this Court on 15th June, 2010. On that day the advocates for both the parties were present before the Court and the Court realized that the appeal was already dismissed due to self-operating order on 12th April, 2010. The learned Judge simply noted this fact in his noting on 15th June, 2010. There is virtually no order passed except recording the fact that the appeal was dismissed on expiry of eight weeks period. Now the question is whether the order of 12th April, 2010 can be reviewed ? The answer is in the NEGATIVE. 2. As said above, the order was self-operating. No change can be made in this order, so as to extend the time of eight weeks given to the applicant after the order had come to its logical end. The review, therefore, fails. The Civil Application is dismissed. [A.V. NIRGUDE, J.] snk/2011/JUN11/ca14706.10