IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 11TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 22ND MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 29146 of 2007(T) -------------------------- AA.76/1999 OF APPELLATE AUTHORITY (LAND REFORMS), KANNUR. .................... PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: ---------------------------------------- THIRUTHUMMAL MAMUKOYA, AGED 83 YEARS, S/O. KOVAKUTTY, NAGARAM AMSOM AND DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK, NOW RESIDING AT 'PRABHADAM', KANHIRA VAYAL, AYYANKAR ROAD, KALLAI POST, 673 003, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI. FIROZ. K.M. RESPONDENTS/SUPPLEMENTAL APPELLANT NO.2/APPELLATE AUTHORITY AND LAND TRIBUNAL: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. C.S.JAYANANDAN, S/O. LATE C.N.SUGANANDA MUDALIAR, AGED 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT 17/2, MASILAMANI HOSTEL ROAD, VELLORE-632 001. 2. THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY (LAND REFORMS), KANNUR. 3. THE LAND TRIBUNAL, THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD. *ADDL. RESPONDENTS 4 TO 6 IMPLEADED: *4. KARTHIK JAYANANDAN, S/O. LATE C.S. JAYANANDAN, MASILAMANI ROAD, VELLORE. *5. VYJAYANTHI JAYANANDAN, W/O. LATE C.S. JAYANANDAN, MASILAMANI ROAD, VELLORE. W.P.(C). NO.29146/2007-T: *6. ANJANA VISWANATH, D/O. LATE C.S. JAYANANDAN, MASILAMANI ROAD, VELLORE. *ADDL. RESPONDENTS 4 TO 6 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 11/02/2008 IN I.A. NO. 16060/2007. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH, ADV. SRI.A.SUDHI VASUDEVAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/02/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.29146/2007-T: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE ORDER A2/94 PASSED BY THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND TRIBUNAL, PALAKKAD DTD. 28/04/1999. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM FILED BEFORE THE R.3. AGAINST EXHIBIT.P.1. ORDER NUMBERED A.A. NO. 76/1999. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) 29146 of 2007 ------------------------------------- Dated: February 11, 2008 JUDGMENT Against Ext.P1 order of the 3rd respondent, the 1st respondent has filed Ext.P2 appeal before the 2nd respondent and that remains pending even now without orders. It is in this background this writ petition has been filed by the petitioner who is the landlord before the 2nd respondent. 2. In view of the fact that the appeal is still pending without final orders, I see no justification to decline the relief sought for by the petitioner for an expeditious disposal of the appeal. Accordingly the writ petition stands disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to take up and consider Ext.P2 appeal with notice to the appellants before the 2nd respondent. Final orders on Ext.P2 shall be passed as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-