1 Cri.Revn.Appln.No.144/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.144 OF 2009 Ramesh s/o Sheshrao Gore ... PETITIONER VERSUS Vandana w/o Ramesh Gore ... RESPONDENT ..... Shri Vijay Sharma, Advocate for petitioner – absent Shri P.A. Bharat Patil, Advocate for respondent – absent ..... CORAM : U.D. SALVI, J. DATED : 16th November, 2011. PER COURT : 1. None present. Perused record and proceedings. Legality and propriety of the judgment and order dated 2.2.2009, passed by learned Family Court, Aurangabad is questioned in the present Criminal Revision Application. 2. Learned Family Court did consider the pleadings and the evidence placed before it. It appears that, the petitioner herein (the respondent in the application before the Family Court) abandoned the proceedings before the Family Court after filing the say to the application for maintenance. Learned Family Court, Aurangabad was, therefore, left with no 2 Cri.Revn.Appln.No.144/2009 option but to consider the unchallenged evidence of respondent herein. 3. It is contended herein that, the petitioner could not pursue the application before the Family Court due to his mental illness. However, there is nothing before this Court in support of this contention. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing this revision application. Revision Application is, therefore, rejected. ( U.D. SALVI, J. ) fmp/crra144.09