IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH OCTOBER 2008 / 7TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 12453 of 2005(G) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- ABDULRAHIMAN, S/O. KUNJUMOHAMMAD NALAKATHUPADUVINGIL HOUSE, AKAMALA, ENKAKAD VILLAGE, TALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.BHASKARAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. 2. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, THRISSUR. 3. THASILDHAR THALAPPILLY, WADAKANCHERRY. 4. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL DIVISION OFFICE, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, WADAKANCHERRY, THRISSUR DIST. 5. A.C.THANKAPPAN S/O. CHAMI AYYANKATTIL HOUSE, AKAMALA, ENKAKAD VILLAGE, THALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.NOBLE MATHEW FOR R1 TO R3 ADV. SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC, KSEB FOR R4 SRI.C.C.THOMAS, SC, K.S.E.B FOR R4 SRI.K.S.ANIL, SC, KSEB FOR R4 SRI.THIYYANNOOR RAMAKRISHNAN FOR R5 SRI.ARUN KUMAR.P FOR R5 SRI.C.CHANDRASEKHARAN FOR R5 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO. 12453/2005-G APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE ASSIGNMENT DEED NO.2805/2000 OF WADAKANCHERY REGISTRY DATED 07/06/2000. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 31/03/2002 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN O.P.NO.12538/2003 OF THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 09/04/2003. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 10/03/2005 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 04/04/2005 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: EXT.R5(a): COPY OF THE ELECTORAL IDENTITY CARD DATED 18/05/1998 OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT. EXT.R5(b): COPY OF THE RATION CARD ISSUED IN THE YEAR 1996 IN THE NAME OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT AND HIS FAMILY MEMEBERS. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rs/ KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.12453 of 2005 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 29th October, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioner approached this court aggrieved by the proposal for giving service connection to the 5th respondent through his property. The 4th respondent submits that in view of the intervening developments, electricity connection can be given to the 5th respondent through another route, without disturbing the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 4th respondent to effect service connection to the 5th respondent within one month from today, without disturbing the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the second prayer is not pressed. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. tgs KURIAN JOSEPH, J ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.12453 of 2005 ---------------------------------------------- J U D G M E N T Dated 29th October, 2008.