1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6657 OF 2007 Abdul Wahid Bashirmiya Deshmukh ...PETITIONER. VERSUS The State of Maharashtra, and others. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri. R.L.Kute Advocate for Petitioner. Shri. V.H.Dighe,A.G.P. for Respondent­State. Shri. V.D.Hon,Advocate for respondent NO.3 Shri. V.D.Gunale,Advocate for Respondent Nos 4&5. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 1ST JULY, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner is declared as surplus. He was working with the respondent No.5. The grievance of the petitioner is that he has not been paid salary, after he was declared as surplus. He was not absorb in the vacant post. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent No.7­Pay and Provident Fund Committee 2 and respondent No.3­Education Officer has not taken decision on his pay bills, which are forwarded by the Management. 3. The respondent­Zilla Parishad asked the petitioner to join and work with earlier Management i.e. respondent No.5. The Respondent No.3­Education Officer shall re­assess this situation by going through the record and on hearing the petitioner, representative of the Management, issue further instructions­directions in respect of the work of the petitioner as regular employee and in respect of issue of his absorption. 4. The Education Officer to take appropriate decision on all these issues within eight weeks from the date of this order. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. Sd/­ Sd/­ [K.K. TATED, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] MTK 3