^L">c^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ PetitionNQ, f2>SlO /2003 PEriTIONERS •^fe:-') 1. M/s Gugga Trading Company Pvt. Ltd. through Hanuman Prasad Agrawal, Director, R/o Gandhi Ganj., Raigarh (C.G.) 2. Smt. Geeta Devi Agrawal, W/o Hanuman Prasad Agrawal R/oGandhi Ganj, Raigarh (C.G.) 3. Ram Kumar Sharma S/o Late Nakky Ram Sharma, Itwari Bazar^ Raigarh. - Versus - RESPONDENTS : J^^ Union oflndia, j°-iC^I> <-^C.^C^-Through Secretary, ^y^^^ Ministry of Law, Shastri Bhawan, ..•^"X?^''J..**^ R- R Road' New Delhi- f•^le^S^ / 2* chief Manager»state Bank of India ^ ^^ /' CommercialBranch,FCIGodownRoad, ^" Tarbahar, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF TH E CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE QF A SUITABLE WRIT, ORDER ORDIRECTION. XI-HC-22 ^eg •^raRfq. "^rNms, fa^wy 3H^T 'q^? ^:.l.:.i?.l°. ^TR^II <»»Hi<n 'M 20»^ l^^r' o(z^fa4t'+ ^i*4<yfi ^ Fs^li <E^^ i&3i{^m^r?^T STT^T^FT 'f^ri^^n^T $b*il°r> ^t^a &f^^ ^•»t€^ ^ +A';A ^k -^A'v ^ DMSION BENCH: HON'BLE SHRI A.S.VENKATACH & HON'BLE SHRIFAKHRUDDIN. ^ ^L \ MOORTHY.CJ 29/06/2004: - Shri h4.L.Pastore, counsel for th^ petitionere. Shri Vinay Harit, Sr. Standing <] for respondent No.1. Shri R.SJaiswal, counsel for tti^ ounsel for the Uhion of India. respondentNo.2 Following the decision of the S(|«premeCourt m the matter of Mardia Chemical Ltd. Vs. Unfon of Indi^ (2004 AIR SCW 2541), thewrit petition stends dismissed. However, it is made clear ttiat taken action under Section 13(4) Reconstruction of Financiat Assets ^ Interest Act, 2002 in such cases 'rt woul appeals under Section 17 of the j ; prescribed therefor, to be counted witti < L_____.___L___._A__. Sd/- Chief Jiistice ivhere a secured crecKtor has of the Securitisatfon and |nd Enforcement of Securtty |d be open to borrowers to fite iM within the limitation as ^ffectfromtoday. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [^^f^