1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 170 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 170 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 170 OF 2006 IN IN IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 272 OF 2002 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 272 OF 2002 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 272 OF 2002 Sau. Kusum @ Ujwala Abasaheb .... Applicants Waghmare & Others (Ori. Petitioner) Vs. Shri Dharu @ Abasaheb Sukhdeo .... Respondents Waghmare & Others. (Ori. Respondent) Mr. P.J. Pawar for the Applicants. Mr. S.P. Kadam for Respondent no. 1. Mr. Y.S. Shinde, APP for the State. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J., CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J., CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J., DATE : 13TH MARCH, 2007 DATE : 13TH MARCH, 2007 DATE : 13TH MARCH, 2007 P.C. 1) This application was made seeking direction to the Respondent no. 1 to deposit arrears of maintenance in Recovery Application No. 187 of 1999. In fact, it appears that against the order granting maintenance passed by the Magistrate, the Respondent no. 1 had preferred revision which was allowed and that order was set aside. Against the order of the Sessions Court, the present applicant had filed Revision Application No. 272 of 2002 2 wherein interim stay was granted to the order passed by the Sessions Court and on that basis present application came to be filed. However, it appears that the revision application no. 272 of 2002 has been already dismissed due to failure of the applicant to comply the Office objections. Therefore, the stay order granted by this Court stands automatically vacated. 2) In view of above circumstances, no order is required in the present application. Application stands rejected. ( J.H. BHATIA, J.) ( J.H. BHATIA, J.) ( J.H. BHATIA, J.)