IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.12218 of 2009 Date of Decision: August 16, 2011 Amarjit Yadav & others ...Petitioners Versus Union of India & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.D.R.Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms.Jyoti Sareen, Advocate, for Ms.Renu Bala Sharma, Advocate, Central Govt.Counsel, for respondent Nos.1 to 5. Mr.Vipin Mahajan, Advocate, for respondent No.6. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioners are raising the money claim by claiming transport allowance. Such money claim can more appropriately be gone into by civil court where issues can be decided on the basis of evidence. The petitioners are relegated to the alternative remedy of filing a civil suit, where the issue can be adjudicated on the basis of evidence led. The writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to avail their alternative remedy, as stated above. August 16, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE