£ i- $W§£E 3&E\§i§§“§ I 00 / '4'” IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. A\5‘ Of 2006 PETITIONER </ C.S.Yadav S/o Late Shri Gulab ‘i Ram Yadav , aged about 1‘ 52 years , Assistant Grade III, Office of Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Raigarh , resident of Babupara, Raigarh (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1.The State of Chhattisgarh, 3 t through: the Secretary , Public ’ Works Department, Mantralay , gag” D.K.S. Bh'awan, Raipur (CG). £3 10 63$. 2. Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, 4 Division Raigarh, Tahsil and District «i Raigarh (CG). r WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE QQ/é/ 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA f / € a '/ XI—HC—78 mmwm 11.8.2006 WWW wmm WWEWW é?a¢%u311%31 '«\— Roshanl~ i ;e petitioner. n 0 / 6 aiso stands dispased of y era! for the State on advance copy. G \‘\‘ Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo‘ Judge P.T.O. “VWV 3am,®a‘1m,1§amg{ ’ “#96 Q.%/.0/ $9.5 mm In 200 Mr. SK Thcmas‘ Advocate for tr Mr.G.KV Beriwai, Dy. Advocate Heard s challenged his transfer order dated 6 7 2006 (Annexure P 1) whereby he h s been transferred from Raigarh DiVieion to Ambikapur Circle By this petition the petitioner The main grievance of the peti ioner is that he is working as Assistant Grade-iii and the seniority of Aseistarit oircie Wiee and in eupport, gradation lst has been enciosed as Annexure Ps2, uty Advocate General for the State. Learned counsel for the petitio er submits that if the order impugned is be which has not been denied by learned the petitioner shall be affected, therefore, the petitioner may be allowed to mak a detailed representation to respondent Not-and inv-turn he be directed to decid the same in accordance with law allowed toaexeouted, then the seniority : Havrng heard learned counsel fo the paities and haVing regard to the facts and Circumstances of the case without xpressmg any opinion on the merit of the case the petitioner is atlowed to mak a detailed representation raising all hrs grievances to respondent No.1 Within 1 days from today along With copy of this petition & annexures and in turn, respo dent No.1 to decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of representation in accordance with law after consldering all the points raised by the petitioner. ln the meantime, till the decis n of the representation the effect and operation of impugned order dated 6. .2006 (Annexure P—t) in respect of the petitioner shall remained stayed With the direction aforesaid the etition stands disposed of Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.31 Certihed copy as per rules. WW (W) rade—lll employees are being maintained p 8 a