IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICJE^TURE AT BILASPUR /CHHATTISGARH^ MISC. CIVIL CASE N0M^OF 2005 APPLICANT <;' Raipur Development Authority, The body incorporated unaer Chhattisgarh NagarTatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam,1973, Having Its Office Near Bajarang Mandir, G. E. Road, Raipur Through its Chief Executive Officer, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS NON-APPLICANTS / ./„ l.Shri Rajiv Sachdev, S/o Shri '" M. L. Sachdev, aged about 40 years, R/o Civil Lines, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. State of Chhattisgarh through ^ The Secretary, Environment & Urban Development Department Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3. The Municipal Corporation ¥ Raipur, a body incorporated, Under Sec.-7of CG Municipal Corporation Act, 1956, having Its office at Malviya Road, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR COMPLETING TUE PROCEEDINGS IN COMPLIANCE OF ORDER DATED ^.5-02-2005 PASSED BY THE HON'BLD COURT IN vsr j W.P.NO'1369/2002 ^^I________- ^w s%/ ^- ^S~l XI-HC-78 W^T^rl^TW cPTT3:n^T$h^i<=b HTq^fl Sh*1|ch ^^^rprR^T, ^TTl<H4i(o, fs«"ii^^< , fU[cc. <3^1^ WT^ ^ 200 aiT^r^ra^ (^f3st^T) ^RTT^K ^f?cT ^n^T 31-8-2006 Shri Maiiindra Shriv] Adv. for the applicaiit. Shri P. Diwakai', Sr. | the respondent no» 1. Shri Prashant Mishr] Deo, Govt. Adv. for the St^ Heard. This is aii applicatioi the proceedirigs in conipli bv this Court iri W.P. While disposing of fh given to the petitioner ther before the Raipur Develop was to be decided by the R period of two mont.hs representation in accordai' Counsel for the petit: passed m time but subseqi Since orders have petition has become infruc The petition is dismi< chl^Id^^ ^IH^T ff (Wl' ^I^K ^3:rf^T3:IT^T ^.stava, Sr. Adv. with Smt. Smita Ghai, |Adv. with Shri P.R. Patankm', Adv. for •k Adcll. Adv. GeneraJ with Slii'i U.N.S. ite. |i for extension of time for completing |aiice of order dated 15-2-2005 passed 1369J/2002. ijeW.P. No. 1369/2002, adirectionwas dn to submit a suitable representation ^iient. Authority within 15 days, which R^ipur Development. Authority, within a from the date of receipt of the lice wlth resolution. loner submits that orders could not be {.lently orders have been passed. jbeen passed by the petitioner, tlus Ituous. ^sed as infructuous. ^--^' ^K^udd'^ 3ixd9e P.T.O.