IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH JANUARY 2010 / 16TH POUSHA 1931 RPFC.No. 256 of 2006(E) --------------------------------- MC.531/2005 of THE FAMILY COURT, MALAPPURAM .................... REVISION PETITIONER (S)/ RESPONDENT ---------------------------------------- SHAMEER KURIKKAL, AGED 25 YEARS, S/O.MOOSA KURIKKAL, MANJAPATTA, ELAMKOOR P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.K.SHIBILI NAHA RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER ------------------------- NEDUNGUNDAN JASEENA, AGED 20 YEARS, D/O.SULAIMAN, NEDUNGUNDAN VEEDU, AMAYOOR P.O., KARAKKUNNU, ERNADU TALUK. R1 BY ADV. MR.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER ON IA. NO.12537/2006 IN RPFC. NO.256/2006 DISMISSED 06/01/2010 SD/- M.N.KRISHNAN , JUDGE TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss M.N. KRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.P.(F.C.) NO. 256 OF 2006 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 6th day of January, 2010. J U D G M E N T Learned counsel for the revision petitioner had shown me an agreement dated 21.12.2007 entered into between the parties thereby they had decided to compromise all the matters. It is also seen that the husband has pronounced 'Talak' and the marriage has ended in divorce. As per the compromise this R.P.(FC) is also to be withdrawn as settled. So in the light of that statement coupled with the submission made by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner this revision petition is dismissed as settled out court. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/-