WPMS 1935/2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. Rahul Consul, the learned Counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj Garg, the learned Counsel for the respondent. It is alleged that an interim injunction had been granted by the lower court in violation of Section 27 of the U.P. Urbun Planning & Development Act, 1973 and that the plaintiff/appellant after taking an interim injunction is adopting dilatory tactics by moving adjournments after adjournments. It is further stated that the appellate court has fixed 22.11.2010 for the disposal of the injunction application. Considering the facts and circumstances that have been brought on the record, I dispose of the writ petition directing the appellate court to decide the appeal on that date itself and if for some reason, it could not be decided on that date, the same shall be positively decided within a week thereafter. This order has been passed in the presence of Mr. Neeraj Garg, the learned Counsel appearing for the plaintiff/opposite party. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) 18.11.2010 Prabodh