IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 22273 of 2008 Between: Jatoth Sujatha Hari W/o.Harish Naik H.No.1-94 Kistapuram Kesamudram Station Kesamudram (M) Waragal District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer Mahaboobabad,Warangal District 2 The S.H.O Kesamudram Warangal District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to declare the inaction of the respondents in not creating conducive atmosphere in conducting the non-conﬁdence motion to be held on 14-10-2008 as illegal arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to conduct the no-conﬁdence motion by creating conﬁdence in the members and by securing the presence of all members quarter. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.GIRI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : O R D E R: The petitioner is the Sarpanch of Kesamudram Gram Panchayat. A motion of No-conﬁdence was moved against Upa Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat. The meeting is scheduled to take place on 14.10.2008. The petitioner’s grievance is that the respondents are not taking any steps to ensure that the meeting takes place in a congenial atmosphere. She has pleaded that the Upa Sarpanch has kidnapped large number of members and makes a reference to the complaint said to have been submitted by a wife of a member. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the 1st respondent and the learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for the 2nd respondent. From the purport of the aﬃdavit, it is evident that the petitioner is in favour of No-conﬁdence Motion moved against the Upa Sarpanch. Not being a member of the Gram Panchayat, she cannot participate in it. Be that as it may, there is nothing on record to conclude that the respondents have not taken any steps to conduct meeting in a congenial atmosphere. At any rate, neither the signatories of the Motion of No-conﬁdence nor the person, who is facing the No-conﬁdence Motion, are before this Court. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed. It is, however, observed that the respondents shall ensure that the meeting takes place without any problem to the law and order. No costs. ______________ 13.10.2008 Note: Furnish copy by tomorrow B/o bcj