IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1866 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1866 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1866 OF 2006 IN IN IN APPEAL (LODG) NO. 101 OF 2006 APPEAL (LODG) NO. 101 OF 2006 APPEAL (LODG) NO. 101 OF 2006 IN IN IN SUMMONS FOR JUDG. NO. 348 OF 2002 SUMMONS FOR JUDG. NO. 348 OF 2002 SUMMONS FOR JUDG. NO. 348 OF 2002 Matchless Investment Finance & Leasing ] .. Appellants (Ori.Plaintiffs) Versus Mr. Oommen Michael ] .. Respondent (Ori.Defendant) Mr. Devendra Wadke i/b M/s. Khaitan & Jayakar for the appellants. Mrs. Madhuri Gaikwad i/b Mr. K.V. Tembe for the respondent. CORAM: R.M. LODHA, & S.A. BOBDE, JJ. DATED: 20TH DECEMBER, 2006 P.C. : . The Appeal suffers from delay of two days. Counsel for respondent has no objection if delay is condoned. As it is, we are satisfied that the Affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion makes out sufficient cause for condonation of delay. 2. We, accordingly, condone the delay in filing the Appeal. Office is directed to process the Appeal : 2 : and place it for admission as soon as numbered. 3. Notice of Motion stands disposed of. Sd/- [R.M. LODHA, J.] [R.M. LODHA, J.] [R.M. LODHA, J.] Sd/- [S.A. BOBDE, J.] [S.A. BOBDE, J.] [S.A. BOBDE, J.]