{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.183 OF 2011 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.490 OF 2009 Gulabchand s/o Hiralal Pardeshi Petitioner Versus Sonabai w/o Vithalsing Jarwal and others Respondents Mr.P.S.Dighe, advocate holding for Mr.V.R.Dhorde, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.P.F.Patni, advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 6. Mr.K.U.Nikam, advocate for Respondent No.7. CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 08th December, 2011 PER COURT: 1 Heard learned Counsel for respective parties. 2 In Second Appeal No.490 of 2009, on 30.11.2009, this Court directed status quo to be maintained till 19.01.2010. The record does not indicate that it was extended thereafter. The matter was taken up for admission on 04.10.2010 when substantial questions of law were formulated and the Second Appeal was admitted. In Civil Application No.7230 of 2009 in the said Second Appeal, on 04.10.2010, this Court did not grant relief in terms of prayer clause (B) in favour of the appellant, however, directed the {2} order of status quo, which was earlier passed, to continue till disposal of the appeal. 3 The photostat copy of the sale deed annexed to the petition at Exhibit-C is dated 30.07.2010, allegedly executed by Smt.Sonabai (appellant in the Second Appeal). Considering the period spent in between the initial order directing status quo to remain till 19.01.2010 and its continuation on 04.10.2010, execution of sale deed on 30.07.2010 does not call or brand to be an act of the appellant in contempt of order of status quo, as the status quo was not extended from 19.01.2010 till 04.10.2010. 4 Contempt Petition stands dismissed. K.U.CHANDIWAL JUDGE adb/cp18311