1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6768 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders. Mr Rajesh Singh, for the petitioner. Mr S.A.Pawar, for respondent no.1. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 09/10/2009 PC: Heard learned counsel for the parties. There is no dispute that the petitioner has filed Revision before District Deputy Registrar (II) under section 154(2) of the Maharashtra Co- operative Societies Act, challenging the recovery certificate, which is impugned in the present writ petition. This Court is informed that Revision Application No.17 of 2009 filed by the petitioner, however, has been rejected since the petitioner failed to deposit fifty percent of the amount of total recoverable dues as T 2 contemplated under section 154(2A) of the Act. On 17.8.2009, in the present writ petition, the petitioner was directed to deposit fifty percent of the amount of total recoverable dues, as contemplated by section 154(2A). The petitioner has accordingly deposited the said amount with the respondent-society as per the order dated 17.8.2009. In view thereof, learned counsel for the respondent- society, submits that the order passed by the District Deputy Registrar rejecting Revision Application No.17 of 2009 be set aside and the Revision itself be directed to be decided on merits. He placed the order dated 23.9.2009 passed by the District Deputy Registrar on record by which the Revision filed by the petitioner has been rejected. The order dated 23.9.2009 passed by the District Deputy Registrar is taken on record. Having considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I am satisfied that this writ petition can be 3 disposed of by the following order. The order dated 23.9.2009 passed by the District Deputy Registrar rejecting Revision Application No.17 of 2009 is set aside and the Revision Application is restored to file. The District Deputy Registrar shall hear and decide the Revision Application on merits in accordance with law expeditiously. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) 4