THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P.No.25326 OF 2010 ORDER: This writ petition has been instituted seeking the following relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit the Petitioner herein prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an Order, direction or a writ or more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order of the 1st Respondent in AP/ 25139/Exemp.Cell/RO/HYD/2010, dated 01-10-2010 as arbitrary illegal, violative of Articles 14 and 19 (1) (g) of the Indian Constitution and unenforceable in law.” But however, since the Appeal preferred by the writ petitioner against the orders passed by the Competent Authority in terms of Section 7A of the Employees’ Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, is pending, I consider it appropriate to direct the writ petitioner to deposit a sum representing 25% of the demand raised on or before 08-11-2010. If the writ petitioner commits default in payment of this amount, the respondents are at liberty to take such measures as are required to recover the money as determined. If the said money is deposited, no coercive steps be taken during the pendency of the Appeal. With this, the writ petition stands disposed of at the stage of admission with the consent of the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Provident Fund. No costs. --------------------------------- Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J mrk 6th October 2010