1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR FIRST APPEAL NO. 21 OF 1995 (Narendra Shankarrao Shinde vs. The Collector, Yavatmal) AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 55 OF 1995 (Vyankatrao @ Shekhar Shankar Shinde vs. The Collector, Yavatmal) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. MARCH 03, 2009. Heard Shri Tathod, learned counsel for the appellant – land owners and Shri Yengal, learned AGP for the respondent. Both the parties inform that the matters could have been disposed of on 25th February 2009 itself when the group of First Appeals filed by the State Government and also by land owners came to be disposed of by common judgment. After hearing learned counsel, I find that the matter is of same village and therefore, covered by the said judgment. In the circumstances, for the reasons recorded in the said judgment dated 25th February 2009 delivered in First Appeal Nos. 647/1994, 22/1995, 674/1994, 689/1994, 299/1994, 76/1995, 105/1995, 122/1995, 299/1995, 301/1994, 302/1994, 304/1994, 2 484/1994, 483/1994, 537/1994, 565/1994, 693/1994, 27/1995, 29/1995, 54/1995, 69/1995, 194/1995, 195/1995, 676/1994 & 677 OF 1994, the claim for enhancement of compensation of house structure as preferred in these appeals by the land owners is liable to be rejected. However, the matter needs to be remanded back for consideration of claim in relation to determination of open plot. Accordingly, the present appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment delivered on 25th February 2009 with similar directions to the trial Court. First Appeals are thus partly allowed with no order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.