C.W.P. No.2819 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.2819 of 2010 Date of Decision.14.05.2010 Hari Krishan Thapar and another ........Petitioners Versus State of Punjab through Financial Commissioner (Revenue) & Secretary to Govt. of Punjab, Rehabilitation Department, Chandigarh and others ....Respondents Present: Mr. Robin Dutt, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manohar Lall, Addl. A.G., Punjab. Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.4. Mr. Ravinder Singh Bassi, Advocate for respondent No.10. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he will be satisfied if the writ petition is taken as representation to the Government and the Government passes appropriate orders on his submission that he was a tenant of the premises and that he was entitled to obtain an allotment on such a basis. 2. The writ petition is ordered accordingly and respondent No.2 will take a decision within a period of eight weeks from today by a speaking order. The petitioner will also be given an opportunity C.W.P. No.2819 of 2010 -2- to furnish such documents as he deems necessary for just decision by the 2nd respondent. 3. Learned counsel, Sh. Sharma appearing for respondent No.4 states that there is a civil litigation pending between the petitioners and the private respondents under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act but it is pointed out by the private respondents that was dismissed for default. It is open to the 2nd respondent to take a decision independent of the civil suit which has been filed, irrespective of the contentions raised by the parties before the Civil Court. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE May 14, 2010 Pankaj*