IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 17TH OCTOBER 2011 / 25TH ASWINA 1933 OP(Crl.).No. 3336 of 2011(Q) --------------------------------------- CMP.488/2011 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT,TALIPARAMBA .................... PETITIONER ------------------- KUNHAMMA THOMAS,W/O.JOSE JOSEPH, THONIKUZHIYIL HOUSE,PULIMPARAMBA, PO TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR 670 141.(AS THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER OF (1). ROYICHA GEORGE,S/O.VARKEY,KOOVERI AMSOM, CHAPPARAPPADAVU DESOM,MANKARA, PO CHAPPARAPPADAVU,TALIPARAMBA AND (2) PAZHAYADATH SOPHIYAMMA THOMAS, W/O.ROYICHA GOERGE,KOOVERI AMSOM, CHAPPARAPPADAVU DESOM,MANKARA, PO CHAPPARAPPADAVU,TALIPARAMBA. BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. JESTIN JOSE,S/O.E.C.JOSEPH, KOOVERI AMSOM,CHAPPARAPPADAVU DESOM,MANKARA, PO CHAPPARAPPADAVU,TALIPARAMBA,KANNUR 670 141. 2. JESSY KURIAN @ THRESSIAMMA, W/O.JESTIN JOSEPH,EDATTEL HOUSE, THALIPARAMBA AMSOM,KEEZHATTOOR DESOM, TALIPARAMBA 670 141. THIS OP (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: OPCR NO.3336/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS P1:-TRUE COPY OF THE POWER OF ATTORNEY. P2:-TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN OS NO.368/2011 P3:-TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED DATED 21/1/2011 P4:-TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 25/3/2011 IN CMP 488/2011 P5:-TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 22/9/2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS NIL:- TRUE COPY P.S. TO JUDGE tss N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J. ---------------------------------------------------- O.P.(Crl.)No.3336 of 2011 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of October, 2011 Judgment The petitioner is the Power of Attorney Holder of the assignors of the property covered by Ext.P3 sale deed. That property was the subject matter of a petition pending before the JFCM Court, Taliparamba filed under the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. According to the petitioner, she was unaware of the prohibition order passed by the learned Magistrate. Realising the fact that there was a prohibition order, the petitioner got herself impleaded in that petition, C.M.P.No.488/2011. 2. The limited prayer of the petitioner is to direct the learned Magistrate to dispose of that petition, C.M.P.No.488/2011, at the earliest. The petitioner, claims to be a bonafide purchaser. It is not necessary by this court to go into the merits of the case. The learned Magistrate will dispose of the petition, C.M.P.No.488 of 2011, as expeditiously as possible after O.P.(Crl.)3336/2011 2 hearing the parties. The Original Petition is disposed of as above. N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. srd O.P.(Crl.)3336/2011 3