:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2165 OF 2005 Pundlik Satappa Bandiwadekar and another ... Applicants versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ... Mr.Nitin Pradhan with Ms. S.D. Khot, for the Applicants. Mr.A.S. Gadkari, A.P.P., for the Respondent. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 20th April 2005 P.C.: . Heard Counsel for the parties. Learned A.P.P. fairly states on instructions that Applicant No.1 was arrested on 17th January 2005 and Applicant No.2 on 18th January 2005. Although 90 days have elapsed, the prosecution has not filed chargesheet as is required by :2: section 167 of the Code. As the Applicants have shown readiness to avail of bail on such conditions, as may be imposed by this Court, the application deserves to be allowed on the following conditions. (A) The Applicants are directed to be released on bail in connection with CR.No.4 of 2005 registered with Chandgad Police Station, Kolhapur, on executing personal bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen thousand only) each with two local sureties in the like amount amount. (B) The Applicants shall not influence the prosecution witnesses nor shall tamper with the evidence in any manner whatsoever. (C) The Applicants shall report to Local Crime Branch, Kolhapur City, twice a week on Wednesday and Sunday between 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. till filing of the charge sheet. :3: (D) The Applicants shall co-operate the trial Court for the early disposal of the trial. If the trial Court is of the opinion that the Applicants are responsible in any manner for delay in disposal of the trial, that opinion be recorded in the roznama, which can be a ground for cancellation of bail. . Application disposed of on the above terms. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)