IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18982 of 2011 1.Jai Prakash Paswan, Son of Saryug Paswan. 2.Urmila Devi, Wife of Jai Prakash Paswan. Both are resident of village Parba, P.S. Jai Nagar, District Madhubani. ---------- Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar -------- Opposite Party ----------- 03/- 16/08/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, who is armed with carbon copy of the case diary. The two petitioners apprehend their arrest, in connection with Khajauli P.S. Case No. 93 of 2009 for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 324, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani. In this case instituted against one Dinesh Prasad Paswan on disclosure of his name by the deceased himself to the informant, petitioners name emerged during investigation on mere suspicion. Petitioner no. 2 having some illicit relationship with the deceased and petitioner no. 1 being her husband. Nothing specific could be pointed out against these petitioners. In view of the above, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani, in connection with Khajauli P.S. Case No. 93 of 2009, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal 2 Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)