The Hon’ble Sri Justice R.Subhash Reddy Writ Petition No.1197 of 2008 Between: Gudimetla Suryanarayana Reddy @ Suresh Reddy. …Petitioner and 1.The Comissioner, Cyberabad, Cyberabad Police, Ranga Reddy District, and 2 others. …Respondents The Hon’ble Sri Justice R.Subhash Reddy Writ Petition No.1197 of 2008 Order: In this Writ Petition, the petitioner seeks direction by way of Mandamus to declare the action of respondent Nos.1 and 2 in not registering the case against respondent No.3 on the complaint of the petitioner dated 22nd January, 2008, as illegal and arbitrary. Initially, the third respondent herein has lodged a complaint against the petitioner and others on 20th January, 2008 with the respondent-Police alleging that they had criminally trespassed into plot Nos.A-95, 96/P, 102 and 103 in Survey No.102 of Nizampet Village, Kukatpally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Based on the said complaint, a case was registered against the petitioner and others in Crime No.66 of 2008 for the alleged offences under Sections 447, 427 and 506 IPC on the file of Kukatpally Police Station. After making preliminary investigation, the accused were arrested, produced before the IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Kukatpally, and were subsequently enlarged on bail. The final report is yet to be submitted in the said Crime. Thereafter, the petitioner herein, as a GPA holder of Ch.Saibabu, P.Surendra, P.Rama Rao and Vallabaneni Venkata Rajeshwari, filed a suit in OS.No.759 of 2007 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge’s Court, Medchal, complaining interference by the third respondent and others in the suit lands admeasuring 1383.03 square yards covered by Survey Nos.87, 88, 89 and 90 and 1156.18 square yards covered by Survey No.102 of Nizampet Village and obtained ad-interim injunction on 31st December, 2003 in IA.No.3399 of 2007. The petitioner, as a GPA holder of the aforementioned four persons, also filed a complaint before the first respondent-Commissioner, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District, seeking Police Aid, on the ground that the third respondent and others are interfering with his property. Aggrieved by the inaction of the respondents 1 and 2 in registering a case against the third respondent despite his complaint, the petitioner approached this Court. The petitioner has already filed a suit in O.S.No.759 of 2007 and obtained ad-interim injunction with regard to the very same property, in which, he alleged interference by the third respondent and others, and made complaint dated 21st January, 2008. If any further orders are required, the petitioner can, as well, move the same Court by filing appropriate application. Merely on the ground that there is an ex parte injunction order from the civil Court in his favour, the petitioner cannot seek any direction from this Court, at this stage, for grant of police aid as the matter has ceased for enquiry before the competent civil Court. With regard to the alleged trespass also, if no criminal complaint has so far been registered, the petitioner can either move the Magistrate concerned seeking appropriate directions or file a private complaint as contemplated under Section 200 Cr.P.C. In that view of the matter, I do not find any merit in this Writ Petition, and the same is, accordingly, dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ (R.Subhash Reddy, J) 29th January, 2008 Note: Furnish CC in two days. B/o lur