1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9911 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.232 OF 2002 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders Mr.V.S.Badakh, learned counsel for applicant. (CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.) DATE : 26th MARCH 2010 None appeared for respondents even though duly served. By the present application, the applicant has prayed that Babu Chavan, whose name is referred in para no.4 of the civil application be added as respondent no.6 in SA No.232/2002 and order to be passed against these respondents restraining them from further alienation of the property inspite of service on the party to bge added, preferred not to appear before the Court. Heard learned counsel for applicant in the civil application. For the reasons stated in para no.3,4,5 and 6, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause A, B and C. The 2 amendment to be carried out forthwith. The newly added respondent no.6 is restrained from further alienation of the property as prayed in terms of prayer clause ‘C’. The civil application stands disposed of accordingly. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/MAR 2010/ca9911-09