C.R. No. 7278 of 2009 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 7278 of 2009 Date of Decision: December 14, 2009 Suresh Kumar Chetal …..Petitioner Vs. Urmila Arora and others …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr. Arun Bakshi, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Vide impugned order an application for amendment of the plaint filed by the plaintiff- petitioner has been dismissed. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the plaintiff- petitioner does not want to lead any evidence on the proposed amended plea sought to be incorporated but the plaintiff merely wants to incorporate the facts which have been depicted in the statement of DW1, a Clerk from Jalandhar Improvement Trust, indicating as to how the property in dispute had C.R. No. 7278 of 2009 [2] allegedly been transferred from the name of LR Labhu Ram Chetal to Kamla Chetal and then to Harish Chetal by way of Will/ sale deed. After hearing counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the facts which have already come on the record in the shape of evidence of other party need not to be incorporated in the plaint. The facts, material for final adjudication of the matter can be taken up by the Court at the time of final adjudication, if these are relevant and have been made part of the evidence as per the procedure of law envisaged in the evidence Act. Taking into consideration the fact that the case has reached at the stage of rebuttal evidence, it is not prudent to interfere in exercise of revisional jurisdiction in the impugned order. Dismissed. December 14, 2009 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE