IN THC B»P.StaXE a£»]ISlSTOErT]?E;'fB EI.PBB SE®BBM:Hia e.a»Hfl.^-t.P64_Bf-'i:sss , Siiaan l-al Sb.uru.a^ sged 35 ^»ars,, asn ef Sbci tMai Singn Btiua?«te^ &a;wsentls' lifoiking CB-BpBEa-tive Ba'vel.epBiBn-b. Cttleer Ce-EfpBE-a.'tlvs. ElsuelBpwsnt Qmc»,Sn1.agarb ISst-fc. S.astar- :^ jK_.B^_S tt a . 03 Si.scfe' 8f B»P»tbEOush Chief Sstcswbaxy Bou.'t of I'iJP^ Bltopal .C2) SacEe^aa^,. R»P.PubIis Seruice CsBisiaaion» Jhd.iBx'a (hp} • C31 CBRBi.ssi.onsx, Eitcise,. Sewt sf np fiuali&r M..MSWS1W ^t. Pfim£OLARS::Br.»fflWrfer ,.g^ ^^ ,„ ^ 1titl«head. 2- gaiEEicuLtea'Br-BFasanjGiaiTs,:; ..^^. Ritg?E: ^. •^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Pfctition fS) No. 1055 of2005 Petitioner Jeevan Lal Dhurve Versus Respondents State of M. P. (now Chhattisgarh) & others (SB: HonUe Shri Satish K. A^nihotri J.) None for the petitioner. Shri N. N. Roy, Paael Lawyer for the respondents/State. O RD E R (orall ( Passed on this 27th day of October, 2009 ) The raatter is catled for heariiig twice. On bofh the occasious none appears nor any representatiou is inade on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner raay not be interested iu prosecutii^ the niatter. In view of the foregoiag, the petition is disiiiissed for waat of prosecution. A copy of this order shaU be sent to fhe petitioner forthwith. ~—~——- satish K. Agnihotri Judge 2. Thakur