u ^ ItolllBeacK INTME HON'BLEHIGHCOIJI^ORCHHATTISGARHATBI^L^ MCONa :£^8^!itt^2011 {AR!SiNaQUTOEWRITEEIITIONL227):N^^^^^ PETITlQNfcRS 1. .^'!. 2. ^' :^^s Dilip Patel aged about21 years s/o Durga Prasad Patel (Plaintiff -No;1 )•.".,:•••.''.^ Deepak Patel aged about 12 years s/o Durga Prasad Patel Through Natural Guardian Mother Shiv Kumari Both residents of Village Mangla Tahsil and Distrlict Bilaspur Chhattisgarh(PlaintiffNo 2) VERSUS 1 -^ Ram Lal s/o Bhaiya Lal aged about67years! Dharam Lal s/o Ram Lal aged abput52years Durga Prasad s/o Ram Lal aged ahpyt46years Eram Lal s/o Ram Lal aged abouf40yearst<i PurQshattam Ratel is/o Ram Lal agedcibout24years Respondents no 11 t6 5 atl residents of Village Mangla Tahsil and Distriict Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 2. 3. 4. 5. ^. ^^ ^?' c 6. ^: 8./ Kamlesh s/o Ram Lal aged about 36 years r/o Village Amlikapa Tahsil Takhatpur DJstrictBitaspurChhattisgarh Kanyakumari w/o Bhagirath! Patel d/o Ram Lal aged about 34 years r/o Village Darribhata Tahsil Seepat District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh Rukmani Patel w/o Gulab Patel d/o Ram Lal aged about 33 years r/o Village Mulmula Tahs!! Pamgarh District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh Ganga Patel w/o Vinod Patel d/0, Ram Lal aged about 30 years r/o Village Hirri Parsada Tahsil Pamgarh District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh 10. Parmeshwari Pate! w/o Rajkumar Patel d/p Ram Lal aged about 26 years r/o Village Nandeii Tahsil Pamgarh District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh 11, State of Chhattjsgarh - Through - The District Collector, District BiiaspurChhattisgarh On beha!f oftheapplicantitissubmittedSsundeF: 9. ^ •^- XI-HC—78 3T?^?T ^5T f<4i<=b "TOT 3TI^T st»*iiob v ^ NWCW ^n-n^i '3~ST •<)I<4I<V1'4, '^^rtTFT^, f®lcll<4^< M?..:.S l^ ^ 200 3TI^?T TPW ('(^fy^T) ?^HW ^f^T ^T^?T S,B: HON'BLE IVIRJUSTICtf N.K. AGARWAL 21.07.2011: Shri A.V. Shridhar, couhsej for the petitioners. Shri Akhil Agrawal, PL CM€<t<r<4lrl'Rndf ^f fe^ Tf^T^H ^^iRw^n^r 'or the State/respondent No. 11. The petitioners are s^eking restoration of Writ Petition (227) No. 1198/2011 which was c|ismissed for want of prosecution vide orderdated 10.5.2011. On due consideration <>f the submission of the learned counsei for the petitioners and the gi|ounds taken in the restoration petition, am satisfied that the absenc^ when Writ Petition (227) No.) based on bona fide grounds.j M.C.C. No. 383/2011, (227) No. 1198/2011 JS resto( ofthe petitioners' counsel on 10.5.2011 198/2011 was taken-up for hearing was therefore, is allowed and Writ Petition ed to its origjnal number. Sd/- N.K. Aganval Judge