IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: May 16, 2011 1. Civil Writ Petition No.3337 of 2006 Jai Singh .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . 2. Civil Writ Petition No.6644 of 2006 Samar Singh & others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . 3. Civil Writ Petition No.7173 of 2006 Ram Murti .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS CWP No.3337 of 2006 [2] State of Haryana & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . 4. Civil Writ Petition No.8009 of 2006 Shyam Lal Jain & others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Sanjiv Gupta and Mr. Y.P. Malik, Advocates, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Sukhvinder Singh Nara, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondents. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This shall dispose of four petitions viz. Civil Writ Petition Nos.3337 of 2006 titled ‘Jai Singh vs. State of Haryana & others’; 6644 of 2006 titled ‘Samar Singh & others vs. State of Haryana & others’; 7173 of 2006 titled ‘Ram Murti vs. State of CWP No.3337 of 2006 [3] Haryana & others’; and 8009 of 2006 titled ‘Shyam Lal Jain & others vs. State of Haryana & others’ as common questions of law and facts are involved. 2. For reference to facts, file of Civil Writ Petition Nos.3337 of 2006 titled ‘Jai Singh vs. State of Haryana & others’ is being taken up. 3. Challenge in this petition is to order/ letter dated 22.8.2003 (Annexure P-2) issued by the official respondents, vide which pay of the petitioner has been refixed and recovery has been ordered. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners assert that cases of the petitioners are covered by judgment dated 10.4.2008 rendered by Division Bench of this Court in ‘Om Parkash & others vs. State of Haryana & others’, reported as 2008(3) S.C.T. 310. 5. Learned counsel for the respondent-State has not been able to dispute the fact that the issue is covered by judgment rendered by this Court in Om Parkash’s case (supra). 6. The petitions are decided in terms of judgment dated 10.4.2008 rendered by Division Bench of this Court in ‘Om Parkash & others vs. State of Haryana & others’, reported as 2008 (3) S.C.T. 310. (AJAI LAMBA) May 16, 2011 JUDGE avin CWP No.3337 of 2006 [4] 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?