IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.2234 of 2009 Date of Decision : July 14, 2010. Surinder Kumar Goel .....Petitioner versus Punjab State Ware Housing Corporation .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.V.K.Jindal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate, for the respondent. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 18.7.2007 (Annexure P-5) whereby he has been granted provisional pension prospectively only without any arrears w.e.f. 1.7.2004. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the considered view that since the disciplinary proceedings have been concluded against the petitioner with an order of punishment, the decision to grant provisional pension, which is essentially adhoc in nature, needs to be replaced by some final decision to be taken by the competent authority C.W.P.No .2234 of 2009 2 as per rules. The respondent-Corporation is accordingly directed to pass an appropriate order in accordance with law/Rules, within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Disposed of. Dasti. July 14, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE