IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16241 of 2010 PURANDER PRASAD GUPTA SON OF LATE JAGESHWAR RAM, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.S. UDA KISHUNGANJ, DISTRICT MADHEPURA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. DISTINCT PROVIDENT OFFICER, SASARAM 5. ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA 6. SENIOR ACCOUNTANT OFFICER, OFFICE OF ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A&E), BIHAR, PATNA ------------------ 2 28.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as also learned counsel for the state, Accountant General. The grievances of the petitioner was regarding a deduction of 50% of his pension as per Memo no. 687 dated 18th February 2009 and for the payment of balance 50% of the pension, the necessary communication was made to the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna Vide Annexure-5. However, till date the petitioner has not received the pension payment order in terms of Annexure -5 to enable him to receive the pension. It is further submitted that although the petitioner does not accept the correctness of the aforesaid order as contained in Annexure- 5 and its consequential order vide Annexure- 6 which has been assailed separately in another writ petition vide C.W.J.C. No. 10648 of 2010, however, for the present at least petitioner should be paid the admitted amount as per Annexures – 5 and 6. It is - 2 - further submitted that the admissible dues of the of the petitioner on account of provident fund dues, leave encashment, group insurance, etc., has also not been settled and paid as yet Learned counsel for the State and Accountant General submits that the grievances of the petitioner as indicated in this writ application need to be verified from the record. In the above circumstances learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his pending claims. Petitioner proposes to file two separate representations one before the Accountant General (respondent no. 5) with regard to the payment of his pension in terms of Annexure 5 and another representation before the District Provident Fund Officer, Sasaram (respondent no. 4) with regard to the payment on account of GPF in terms of Memo no. 12117 dated 7th December 2007 and for rest of the claim like group insurance leave encashment etc, petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the respondent no. 2. In view of the above, in case all the three representations stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the - 3 - above respondents shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and the admitted dues could also be paid along with interest permissible under the rules. However, upon consideration, if any of the claims or part of the claims are not being paid, the same may be informed to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Amrendra ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.),