^»^^^:^^.s£S^^^^gg^^^^^^^^,: A~? 6sNU4-1- G^/c^-Z^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CG) WRITPETITION^SyNO. ^0^'2' /2006 PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PETITIONER .\'-.<\s^ >..l"*'\> J.l*"' f\ w^ '" yx RESPONDENTS •f^ "Vsf ^^^. "n^..^^" - Kailash Panigrahi (D. Ed.), aged about36 years, son of Shri Daulat Ram Panigrahi, Assistant Teacher, Government Primary School Bokramuda, Vikas Khand Baramkela, District Raigarh (CG) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner, Department of Tribal Welfare, Raigarh (CG) \.o r XI-HC-78 W^TWf^IW <WT3lI^TshKiit) SulAash ^ .-^- •^ <ii^<»iiai*irai 3^'^ITEfRra', WTflu'ie, Rldiy^ U-p.CS^^O. -7043/o£ W^ 200 gn^?Tq^(q? (i^qt^q^ff) ??(iTW;gf?cf3n^r 19.12.2006 ©overtiment Shri AM. Bhakto, Advocat^ Shri Sushi! bubey, Soo, ©ovt.Advocate for the resp4 Wtth the consent of lear^ed counse! for the parties, the t'rit petition is heard finally. Common order dictated in| open Court, passed separately. ^rfcTifrT WRTT'iffWt ^RSR ^srf^T 311^1 for the petitioners (s). ment Advocate with Shri Arun ndents/State. Writ Petition (5.) 7043/M06 in Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge P.T.O. Petitioner 'ents Kailoish Panigrahi State of Oihattlsqarh & another dois Manikpurl & another Versus i-s State of Chhattisgarh & another SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satlsh K. Agmhotri, J Present: Shri A.N. Bhakta, Adyocate for the petitioners (s). Shri Sushii Dubey, Sovernment Advocate with Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for- the respondents/State. OR D E R (Passed on this 19+h day of December, 2006) The foiiowmg order of the Court is passed by Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Learned counse! appearing for the petitioners as atso for the 1. L-SQ Stats/respondents jointly submit that the facts of the present writ petitions are similar to that of in VV. P. (S) No. 5473/2006 (Rakesh Kumar Sharma S, uio1+ier vs. State of Chhatt'isgarh & others), which was disposed of vlde order dated 9.10.2006 (Annexure P/2). They further submit that the question of !aw involved is also the snme. 2. In view of 1+ie above stated submissions made by fearned counsel for the part-ies -ihe writ petitions nre disposed of in tsrms of the order dated 9.10.2006 passed by this Courf- in VV. P. (5) No. 5473/2006 Rakesh Kumar Sharma & ano1+ier vs. State of Chhattlsgarh & others). No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be pfaced on record i'n connected matters. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Subhash