IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.405 OF 2004 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.405 OF 2004 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.405 OF 2004 M/s.Alfred C.Toepfer (I) Export Ltd. .. Appellant V/s The Income Tax Officer Ward No.3(4), Mumbai .. Respondent Mr.F.I.Irani with Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Appellant. Mr.R.V.Desai with Mr.R.Asokan for the Respondent. CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 25.01.2005. DATE : 25.01.2005. DATE : 25.01.2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Perused the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 31st October, 2003. The learned Counsel for the Appellant fairly states that so far as issues raised under Question Nos.1 to 5 in this Appeal are concerned, they are squarely covered by the Division Bench judgment in the case of C.I.T. V/s.Asian Cable Corporation C.I.T. V/s.Asian Cable Corporation C.I.T. V/s.Asian Cable Corporation Limited - 262 ITR 537 Limited - 262 ITR 537 Limited - 262 ITR 537. So far as Question Nos.6 & 7 are concerned, the learned Counsel for the Appellant states that he has instructions not to press the same. Under these circumstances, nothing further survives in this Appeal. Appeal therefore stands dismissed. ....