IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35609 of 2009 SATYENDRA KUMAR VERMA @ TUNTUN SAO & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 02. 04. 2010. Heard the parties. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Daniyawan P.S. Case No. 20/2009 dated 23. 05. 2009, registered under Sections 498 A, 304 B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is elder brother of the husband of the deceased and he is separate in mess and business with the husband of the deceased. Therefore, he had no motive to participate in the crime in question. He further submits that co-accused Bobby Devi ( a lady) as also some other in-laws of the deceased have been extended privilege of anticipatory bail by this court. From perusal of the F.I.R., it is apparent that petitioner has played a primal role for committing the crime in question and therefore, the case of this petitioner can not be treated to be similar to those co-accused persons who have been extended privilege of anticipatory bail. In that view of the matter, the petitioner must surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today and seek regular bail. If such a petition is filed, then the same may be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. The petitioner shall be at liberty to take all the pleas in the court below for the purpose of grant of bail. m.p. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.) 2