^ INTHE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR sfilf W.P. No.'3'-78'7 /2004 PETITIONER r- ^•^-^n^3-^'" RESPONDENTS : Santosh Kumar Verma, aged about 39 years, S/o; Late Shri J.P. Verma, Presently posted as Patwari, Patwari Circle No.7, Hardi, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur; Chhattisgarh VESSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh The Collector, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh Sub Divisional Officer (R), Sub Division Kota, Distrjct Bilaspur Chhattisgarh The Tehsildar, TakhatpurTehsil, District Bilaspur, Chhatfisgarh The Tehsildar, Kota Tehsit, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/2270F THE CONSTITUtlON OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARSABOUTTHEPETITIONER: As mentioned above in the cause title ofthe petition, 2. PARTICULARSABOUTTHERESPONDENTS As mentioned above in the cause title of the ptetition *11*1CTI d»*(l<0 3S[ "4iqid<4, 8>fll<H'1 IS, R«'fl'(Hy,< ^:.^:.^^^ an^T 'f^; (yitai't^) dll^ill ^T ft-fi'* W tMi^ sttii<o \ l- GRPRJ-. ^ditw ^rfcfl sn^ 15-12-2004 Shri Ranbir Siagh Marhas, (jounsel for fhe petitipners. Shri Satish Gupta, Dy. Govt| This coTnmon ordcr shall 1 W.P.No.3788/2004 (ttonafc Stnfllh iEsftdtrtga PS. Stnte oT Chhattistiew'h Sf QitherS and *l<<[f)<il'f *<W<'?f4ft^<Rltil< ^aiRSsii^f • Advocate for the State ^lso govcm. fhe disposal of W.P.No.3789/2004 {Neem PrasciA &AiwHter_ys, Slxite ofCtthaWsfiarh & Other^. Heard. Lcamed Counscl for fhc matter relates to transfer of ft^e pctitioners/Palwaris. He farther subinits that for the pre^ giveu an opportunity of filin^ a d the cotapeten.t authprily of the v coasidcicd oa its own inerits in acd'orda.iicc wifh law. Havmg considered and wltti on fhe merits ofthe case, in the ofcinion offhis Court, ends of justice wilt be served if alHiTectioD :fltioiicrs subnuts fhat fhc .ent fhe petitioneis naay be itailed representation before :spondeats, which ahall be out expressing any opmlou is given to the petitioner to niake a detaUed ispresentation ra^siag their grievaaces before thc coinpctent autliority of fhc ics^ of ftie petition aad this order, wi| pondcnte along witli a copy thin 15 days, and on such reprcsentation being ffled, the (jompeteut authorily of the respondents shall decide the ss|me on its own inerits tn accordaiice with law as early as p wccks froin fhc date ofj-cccipt oftl|ie represcQtaUon. Itis madc t^ssible pre&rably wifhin six (.—50,000. 7 '8 W/TO^ 't'O/OOZ^ spiiB^s uoT(pad siip 'saor^. •MB]| &eva: iavt<scf!C)3d sc^ 'svcBma^ i^iteMyie^ M&tejl (2>^j. j?.,(iatiUt i.[i.ujblifc a6pnf ujppnjq)(ej -/PS •4f0/682,e s? W/88/,e'oN'd'A psa^id aq-ispio ss^ jo MCQ •jo pssodsip PVCB^S OS[B feO/ZOSfr IsoM-j-M'int 'Apaanbasaoo •jo pasodsip 'saor^Aiaeqo pTBsaxoje atp xpi^ jspan 3iqB{i8AB Apataat aTp JIB&B ^TJ.S aoOBAaua ^OB ji ysvft jBSp anfo u<no£> rtf^ ibjbi&li^ll£Uii& jbjli^jifc U^IIE (t&laEjbL) «bKh ii^iip OOZlstt...... .......................flh'titPhJh ^'H.ti-ibj.'aifftyisi 'i-,.wit»ih--fcn.p