1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.3231/2007 [Lalitkumar Marotrao Shanware .vrs. Anjuman Hami-E-Islam and others] ............................................................................................................................................................................................. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................................... Mr. S.S. Tambulkar, Advocate for the petitioner, Ms. Trupti Udeshi, Advocate for respondent nos.1 and 2. .......... CORAM : K.J. ROHEE AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ DATED : OCTOBER 1, 2008 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner was appointed as Lecturer in Applied-Physics and other subjects by appointment order dated 26.8.2005. He was again appointed during next year by another appointment order dated 29.8.2006. The grievance of the petitioner is that without confirming him in the post of Lecturer, advertisement for the post of Lecturer was published on 9.6.2007. The petitioner also applied in 2 pursuance of the said advertisement. He was called for interview by letter dated 14.7.2007. Accordingly he appeared for the interview held on 18.7.2007. However, the petitioner was not selected. In the select list he was at Sr. No. 2. Thereafter, the petitioner filed the present petition challenging the selection process. 3. It may be noted that once the petitioner faced interview by taking chance of selection, he now cannot find fault in the selection process based on the advertisement. In this view of the matter, there is no merit in the petition. The same is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE Gulande