WP(C) 3060/2008 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. S.K. Medhi, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. K. Das, learned Standing Counsel, BTC. The petitioner is aggrieved by the Annexure-IV, W.T. message dat ed 8.7.08 followed by the Annexure-V letter dated 14.7.08, by which the settleme nt of Dwarkuchi Bazar, earlier made in favour of the petitioner was cancelled. There is no dispute that before cancellation of the settlement m ade in favuor of the petitioner, he was not put to any kind of notice. Mr. K. Da s, learned Standing Counsel, BTC has produced the letter dt. 14.7.08 by which th e Executive Member, BTC desired that the settlement be made with one Shri Tupra Boro (Respondent No. 4). The Respondent No. 4, although, was the highest bidder with the bid amount of Rs. 1,82,000/- but his tender was rejected in absence of required documents. In view of the above, the petitioner remained the only valid hig hest bidder and was settled with the market but the same was cancelled by the im pugned W.T. Message and the letter referred to above, as per desire of the Execu tive Member, BTC. In view of the above, the impugned action on the part of the aut hority towards issuance of the impugned W.T. Message and the letter dt. 8.7.08 a nd 14.7.08 (Annexure-IV and V respectively) cannot be sustained. Consequently bo th the orders are set aside and quashed and the writ petitioner is allowed to ru n the market on the basis of the settlement made earlier. The letter produced by Shri K.Das, learned Standing Counsel, BTC , shall form part of the record.