1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.09.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.(MD)No.8861 of 2011 and M.P.(MD) Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 K.M.Muthukannan, Proprietor, M/s.Sree Meenakshi Modern Rice Mill, Rajapalayam Taluk. ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Head Office, Chennai – 10. 2. The Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Virudhunagar Region, Virudhunagar. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.M.H.6/9587/2011 dated 26.07.2011 confirming the order passed by the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.B1/246/2011 dated 19.02.2011 and quash the same. For Petitioner ... Mr.M.Ajmal Khan For Respondents ... Mr.M.Govindan Special Government Pleader O R D E R This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.M.H.6/9587/2011 dated 26.07.2011 confirming the order passed by the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.B1/246/2011 dated 19.02.2011 and quash the same. 2. Heard Mr.M.Ajmal Khan, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader who takes notice for the respondents. 3. This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the cancellation of the hulling agencies and black listing of the petitioner for certain violations. As against it, the petitioner has filed an appeal https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 to the first respondent on 03.03.2011. After filing the appeal, the petitioner filed additional grounds on 17.06.2011. The first respondent-Appellate authority, however, passed the impugned order on 26.07.2011 without considering the additional grounds raised by the petitioner and the re-analysis report which is said to be in favour of the petitioner and on these grounds, the petitioner challenges the impugned order stating that the non-consideration of the additional grounds and re-analysis report render the appellate authorities order bad. 4. According to the petitioner, in the order under challenge, there has been total non-application of mind and violation of principles of natural justice. 5. The fact that the additional grounds and further documents, namely, re-analysis report said to be in support of the petitioner, have not been considered, is not in dispute and is not reflected in the order under challenge. Therefore, the petitioner's plea is tenable in law. 6. In view of the above, the impugned order of the first respondent is set aside and the matter is remanded to the first respondent for re-consideration on merits and in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Such exercise shall be completed within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. The Writ Petition is allowed, as above. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No Costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Head Office, Chennai – 10. 2. The Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Virudhunagar Region, Virudhunagar. +1 CC to Mr.M.Ajmal Khan, Advocate (SR.No.31755) +1 CC to Mr.M.Govindan, Special Government Pleader (SR.No.31585) W.P.(MD)No.8861 of 2011 15.09.2011 ps/ts NSV/29.9.11/2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/