1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of | coram, appearance, court’s orders |Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’ orders| WRIT PETITION NO.7542/2009 ... Shri Jedhe,Adv.for petr. Shri V.S.Khairnar,Adv.for R.5. Shri D.R.Kale,AGP for State. ... CORAM : R.K.DESHPANDE,J. DATE : 19/7/2010. 1] This Writ Petition challenges the order dated 6/6/2009 passed in Revision Application No.28/08 filed by the petitioner under Section 154 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The notice of attachment was the subject matter of revision before the Divisional Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Aurangabad. The same has been dismissed and therefore, the revision petitioner is before this Court. 2 2] The learned counsel for the respondent raised a preliminary objection as to existence of any such remedy to challenge the order passed in Revision or even how order of attachment under Rule 107 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules,1961 by filing a Suit as contemplated in Rule 107(19)(c) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961. In support of his contention, he has relied upon decision of this Court reported in 2002(2) Mh.L.J.948 in the case of Sangli Sahakari Bank Ltd. Bombay V/s Divisional Joint Registrar, Bombay and others, wherein it has been held that the right to file suit under Rule 107(19)(c) is available even if parties seek recourse to remedy of revision under Section 154 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 and after disposal of revision and also without invoking revisional jurisdiction. In view of this, there an alternate statutory remedy available to the petitioner. Hence, instant Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed on this ground. 3] In the result, Writ Petition is 3 dismissed. No order as to costs.The petitioner shall be at liberty to avail the alternate available remedy. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observation on merits of this Petition. (R.K.DESHPANDE) JUDGE umg/wp7542-09 4