CGl Petitioner' SHATBIt., ISJ N0. 2007 Ku. S tffla Bada (o.fter marriage 5mt. Sushma Bada) aaed about 3i year's. O/o. Benjamin Assistant Teacher'. ^overnment Tribat Schoo!- Vikas Kh-and Strot Centi'e, &uidui'a, Distt. Jashpur (c.e.-) St. 1. Tne State of Chhattisgar'h, through - the Sscretary, !?epartment c'f TribaS Welfare, &au Kaiyan Singh Bhar.'m, Raipuf (C.&.) 2. The Assfetanf Comrnissioner-, beptt of Tribal Weifare, Di-stt. T.-nk-.l -, • If C, \ •jasnpw (<-.».; The JnboS Officar, Block/Vikas Khand Strot Kendro &u!dula, bistt, Jashpuf ».1 !; Hon'bie Mr. Justice K. Agniltolri, J Mr. U.R. Koshaley, Advocate for the petitioner, Mr. A]vf Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for State/respondents. •^- O R & (Passed on thia 20" Day of /Ipril, 2007) 1. Tne question of law invojved he"ein is asto whether the petitione" is ^rifitied tc? r^yuior1 pffy scfflc w.c.f. fh's deTf'c of tnitial appointn1^fit or froi^ he oote of coniplstion of probation psriod. 2. Leariieci counsel appearing fo" the petitioner' as wel! iss for the StateA dants jointly submit that the facts ond question of faw invoSved in the present writ petit'on we the same to that of in W. P. {S (S) No. 5473/2006 ^akesh Kumar' Sharma and another vs. 5tate of Chhattiggarh A others), which was of vide order dated 9.10.2006. 3. In vtew of the (tbove-stated submissjons made by leor-ned counsel for the par-ties, the writ pstition is disposed of m the same terms. No order as to cosfs. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge Subhc.gh