^M- IN THE HONTBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARHl WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^37/2010. PETITIONER: ./ ^.to-' ^ ^^ ...••"'".'^'^•'>"" ^^y '^'^' r" Murlidhar Patel, son of Shri Janak Ram Patel, aged about53 years, ^ working as Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Urdana, Block Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. versus Respondents ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary School Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ^ 2* District Education Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ^ 3. Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^€K:^!a^ HIGH COURTOF CH|-iKnioGARHj_^LASPUR Slnale Bench; Hon'bSe Shri Jvlanindra rolohan Shrivastava. J. pfcTmprvcK RESPONDENT3 WRiT_pcTmp_NtSlNG,2ol7/gu1u ivlurlidhar Patel versys State of Chhatfcisgam and others WRiT PETITsGN UNDER ARTiCLE^2tOF_Tn£CGN.rLTllTiONOFJriDLn Present: - Shri C.J.K. Rao, couns&l for the petraoner. Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, Panei Lavvyer for the State. ORAL (Passed on 22nd June, 2010) 1. The petitioner was appointed on 10/07/1976, in Basic Training institute on probation of Rs.100/- and after that Rs.1507- in the second year after ciearance ofthe first annual examination. After completion of his probation, he vvas granted reguiarpayscaie. 2. Le-arned counsei appearing for the petltioner submits that the issue invoived in the case is as to whether, the petitioner is entltied to reguiar pay scaie with effect from the date of Initial appojntment or after completlon of probation period. 3. The issue invoiv-ed herein was considered by the Mauhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A.No.2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others v. State of Evl.P. & others), wherein it was hejd that the simiiariy situated teachers are entltled to reguiar pay scale vvith effect from the date of initial appointment. Tne matter was taken up to the non'ble Supreme Court. The 4"^'^ '%„ /£...^ss- ^ j 1 v^y? appeai was dismissed by the h8orrbje Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunai to the errect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are enyued to regular pay scaie frorn the date of Iniual appointment 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petluoner further submits that this Courl:, 'whiie considering the same issue in Ram Kumar Sahu & others v\ State Govt. of Chhanisgam & another, W.P.(S).No.813 of 2007, by order dated 12/02/2007, has granted reguiar pay scale with effect from the date of InJtial appointment. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the parties jolntly submlt that the case Is squareiy covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Rarn Kumar Sahu & Others v. State Govt. of Chhattisgam & another (supra). S. in view of that, this peution is ailowed on the same terrns, suuieci: to verification ofthe facts. No order as to costs. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge nuM;.'i'