IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5404 of 2011 Patha Pandit, Son of Late Chanarik Pandit, Resident of Village – Lodipur, P.S. – Arwal, District – Gaya. …………………Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Balmiki Nagar, East Champaran. 4. The Superintending Engineer, Tirhut Canal Circle Betia. 5. The Executive Engineer, Don Nahar Division, Gandak Yojna, Ramnagar. …………. Respondents. ---------------------------------- 3 09/09/2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the order dated 25.03.2011 in the address of Respondent No. 5 in place of ‘Don’ word ‘Son’ has been typed and as such it may be corrected. On perusal of the record it appears that in the main writ petition the word ‘Son’ has been mentioned. Despite the fact that the writ petition has been disposed of, for the ends of justice, it is desirable to permit learned counsel for the petitioner to make correction in the address of Respondent No. 5 in course of the day. Accordingly, correction is made in the order dated 25.03.2011 in the address of Respondent No. 5 as ‘Don’. Accordingly, it may be read as ‘Don’ in place of ‘Son’. The order is modified up to that extent. Praful ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)