IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 13TH JANUARY 2009 / 23RD POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 1272 of 2009(B) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- RADHA.K, TYPIST/CLERK, KAMCO, ATHANI, ADIYATHAPADAM HOUSE, AYYAKAD.P.O, VADAKKANCHERRY, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH (SR.) SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON SRI.JIBU P THOMAS SRI.P.S.APPU SRI.A.R.NIMOD RESPONDENT(S): -------------- 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA AGRO MACHINERY CORPORATION LTD., ATHANI POST, ERNAKULAM. 2. KERALA AGRO MACHINERY CORPORATION LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, NEW INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AREA, MENON PARA ROAD, KANJIKODE POST, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR, SC, R1 AND R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.1272/2009-B ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 13th day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is working as Typist-Clerk under the second respondent. She was appointed on 16/08/2000. The appointment was through Employment Exchange. Initially, it was for a period of one year and, after one year of service, she was asked to continue on daily wages and still she is continuing. Now she is of the age 46 and the chances for getting any other employment is too remote. The petitioner is the only sole bread- winner of the family as her husband is physically handicapped person. It is stated that they do not have any own residence or any property. 2. Seeking for regularisation of her service, she has moved the first respondent as per Ext.P4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the first respondent may be directed to consider Ext.P4 and pass appropriate orders. 3. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents also. There will be a direction to the first respondent to consider Ext.P4 in W.P.(C) No.1272/2009 -:2:- accordance with law and pass appropriate orders in the matter within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the copy of this judgment. As the petitioner has been continuing on temporary engagement, she may not be relieved for accommodating fresh temporary hands. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms