IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No.36273 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 01, 2011 Arun Sharma ...Petitioner Versus Saket Forgings & another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.A.P.S.Shergill, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The impugned order appears to be amenable to revisional jurisdiction. If it is so, the petitioner may, at the first instance, file a revision against this order. Counsel says that impugned order is dated 16.5.2011. The present petition has been filed on 28.11.2011. Keeping this fact in view, the Court may consider the prayer of the petitioner for condonation of delay in accordance with law. Disposed of. December 01, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE