WP/3438/2010 : 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3438 OF 2010 Bombay Paints, Unit of Grauer & Weil (India) Ltd. ... Petitioner V/s. Shri Pandurang More & Anr. ... Respondents Mr.J.P. Cama with Mr.K.S. Bapt for Petitioner Mrs.Neeta Karnik for Respondent No.1 CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: SEPTEMBER 23, 2010 P.C.: 1. The Petitioner has approached this Court against the award part I and part II passed by the Tribunal. By awards Part I and II, the Tribunal had held that the enquiry was fair and proper and that the findings of the enquiry officer were perverse. An opportunity was therefore granted to the petitioner to lead evidence before the Court to establish the charge against the workman. The petitioner examined only one witness who was a peon. He was unable to prove the misconduct alleged against the workman and, therefore, the Labour Court concluded that the Petitioner had failed to prove the misconduct against the workman. In these circumstances, the Labour Court has granted reinstatement with continuity of service and full backwages. In my opinion, there is no error at all committed by the Labour Court. 2. Petition rejected.