1 WP 7197/10 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7197 OF 2010 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. Dilip Bodake for the petitioner. Mr. V.S. Talkute for respondent nos.1 and 2. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 16TH NOVEMBER 2010 P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. The writ petition is directed against an interlocutory order. Both the courts below have recorded a concurrent finding by reasoned orders which calls for no interference. In any event, the petitioner cannot claim injunction that no action should be taken against her by the respondents in accordance with the rules and regulations. The petitioner apprehends 2 WP 7197/10 that she would be dismissed from service wrongfully. If she is so dismissed, she can challenge the termination by way of an appeal under section 9 of the M.E.P.S. Act. This is also one of the grounds for not interfering with the order in exercise of writ jurisdiction. The writ petition is rejected summarily. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)