IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16002 of 2010 PAWAN DAS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 6.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Informant’s daughter disappeared and non-returning within expected period was found a case of kidnapping. Victim girl after appearance made statement clearly of kidnapping that this petitioner asked her to accompany him to purchase Form for any post of Railway and in that connection petitioner took her to his friends from where they took her to Howrah and Bombay. Statement of victim girl is doubted on the ground that the role of the petitioner is about demand of ransom from the informant, not corroborated by him and a proposal from co- accused Shamsher to marry him followed by recovery of his Mobile from vbictim’s bed, according to learned counsel, indicative of the fact that there was victim’s affair with Shamsher and under pressure of her family members after her recovery, she has made this statement basing which petitioner’s anticipatory bail cannot be refused. Thus, having regard to the facts and 2 circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in Chakai P.S. Case No. 109 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)