IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 10331 of 2008 Between: Mohd habibuddin S/o Mohd. Multhani R/o Saroor Vg., Raikode Mandal, Medak District, presently at tekur Village, Nyalkal mandal, Medak Dsitrict. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sangareddy, Medak District. 2 The Tahsildar (Mandal Revenue Officer) Raikode Mandal, medak district. 3 Mohd Moinuddin S/o Mohd. Multhani R/o Ahmed Nagar Colony, Zaheerabad, Zaheerabad Mandal, Medak District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directingthe Respondent No.1 herein to consider and dispose the application dated 26-9-2005 filed by the petitioen for his impleadment and for erly disposal ofthe appeal i.e, appeal No. A3/1518/2005 which was preferred by the 3rd respondent under A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act 1971 aggrieved by the Mutation orders passed bythe 2nd respondent vide nO. b/32/05 dated 4-5- 2005 in respect of the lands in sy. No. 60/1 and 60/2 extent Ac. 2-31 guntas and 0-31 untas respectively situated at Sirpur village, Raikode Mandal, Medak District within two weeks from the date of the order by duly declarignthe actionof the respondent No.1 in nto considering and disposing the application dated 26-9-2005 filed by the petitioenr so far as is nothing but arbitrary, illegal and contrary to the provisions of A.P. Rights in Lands and pattadar Pass Books Act 1971 and pass such further or other orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper inthe circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.RAVI KIRAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 10331 of 2008 Oral order: It is the case of the petitioner that he filed application dated 26.09.2005 seeking his impleadment in Appeal No. A3/1518/2005, preferred by respondent No.3 before respondent No.1, namely the Revenue Divisional Officer, Sangareddy, as against the orders of mutation dated 04.05.2005, passed by respondent No.2, namely the Mandal Revenue Officer, Raikode Mandal, in respect of the lands in quesdtion, but till date no action thereon had been taken. Hence, he filed the present writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, and both of them agreed for disposal of the writ petition with the following directions: Respondent No.1, namely the Revenue Divisional Officer, Sangareddy, is directed to consider and dispose of the application dated 26.09.2005 of the petitioner, and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, expeditiously. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 02nd May 2008 KSR/Nsr