IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 1236 of 1992 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.R.SHAH ======================================================== 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? --------------------------------------------------------- CITURGIA BIOCHEMICALS LTD. Versus DAKSHIN GUJARAT GENRAL MAZDOORUNION ---------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 1236 of 1992 M/S TRIVEDI & GUPTA for Petitioner No. 1 MR RK MISHRA for Respondent No. 1 MR KM PATEL for Respondent No. 2 MR PM THAKKAR for Respondent No. 3 ---------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.R.SHAH Date of decision: 23/04/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT In the present Special Civil Application, the petitioner company has challenged the order dated 24.1.1992 passed by the Labour Court, Surat, below Exh. 7 in Reference (LCS) No. 14/89. This Court, while admitting the presetn Special Civil Application on 24th March 1992 and granting ad-interim relief directed the Presiding Officer, Labour Court No.3 to hear and dispose of the REference within a period of two months from the date of receipt of writ of the order. 2. Today when the matter is called out, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Shri K.M. Patel, ld. advocate appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 and Mrs. Pahwa, ld. advocate appearing on behalf of respondent No.3 are present. But they are not aware whether the Reference in question is decided and disposed of or not. This Court, as stated hereinabove passed the order directing the Labour Court to decide and dispose of the aforesaid Reference within a period of two months, in the year 1992 and therefore the REference in question must have been disposed of by the Labour Court and accordingly the present Special Civil Application is required to be disposed of as having become infructuous. The petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. Liberty to revive the petition in case of difficulty if the Reference in question is not decided and disposed of. Rule is discharged accordingly with no order as to costs. rmr. [ M.R. Shah, J. ]