IN THE mOH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR WRITPETITIONNO. '72<S^/2Q06 ^ PETITIONER ^' .V'f..<-'GY^-"" ^^y-^ M^T^ '?..•-" .^•"".^'s^v...^"" ^'^vw--y""' ?tey'»...-••" :Sumedi Sildar ./ _, S/o Vibhwar Sildar Aged about 54 years R/o- Village/P.O-Devkuha, Tehsil- Khairagarh, Dist- Rajnandgoan (C.G) Versus RESPONDENTS ^- ^l' f.,,. .3 1;1 A~> ®^ / o V State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Public Works Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G) Finance Secretary, State ofChhattisgarh D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G) -laljj 3. Sub-Divisional Officer Sub-Division Office C.G PWD, PWD Office, Dongararh, Dist- Rajnandgoan (C.G) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE WRIT ORDER OF DIRECTION TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. XI-HC.-78 3'^''<<i'4i5ii, aTflti'is, I«K'II<;I^< +11*IMI st»*1icb FST '^HMtl, ®Ttltl'16,T^THT L^^.^-' ^'2-^7<-< "^R; 200 3n^5TIT^7 ('idI^siq.eT) Sd^Tqirf^IR; cRTSlTOTshllti Qopal \-' ?T(ITWlrf?tT3TI^T ^ ^ ^' 7-11-2006 Mr. P.M.Shriwas, counsel ftti Mr. V.V-S.Moorthy, Deputy|ftdvocate Generdwitti Mr. ^ay Dwh/edi, Panel Lawyer| respondents. With the consent of learnecj matter is heard finallyand disposetl Common order diclated in Court, passedseparatety. *i<iF<i41-f HitiMTffte^<l°i«i< ^3:ri^IT3I1^?T rttw pefltloner. for the Stsrte of counsel appearingforthe parties, the lof. Writ Petition No.176 of 2005 ta <^)en Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge P.T.O. -:~~^i •\l HIOH COURT OF CHMMTIS^ARH AT BILA^PUR ;H : HON'BL£MR.SAT»MK. ••¥:' PfSlwwr RwnondentB VWOTPETmONWa't7«OFaOW MamAaran vereus Stata of OhhrtNagaBti and ottws wwr rermcw NOABi OF MOB Petittonw Khedumm vereus ftespondwita Stato ef Chhrttt^Kh and wiottnr l^ PetWoner WUTPEriTION NO^MOF WW LatitaBat 1-> vereus Th»Statoof GWaU^arhand othsre WBn'PETITION N(X88»OF200S Petjtfoner Dwarita ftwad Drtwfflya Rwoonitoflte vwsus Slata af ChhaUteawh andanoNw :1 r—- ^^s&^ ! ..} PBUBoner Raspondmts VWOT PETmON NO.B2BOF 20BB K^Patel versus State of (ShhalB^arti and anotha ,t. PeUBonw SasasaSveSs WUT PETmON NO.«6*OF20WS SmtSabitriBri StatoBt Chhrtlftuarti and another PetBionw RftBfilGN'KtolltS Smt. Hmnin Stale of aihtfiajcti md anoBwr PeUfenw WRH- PETITION N0.11MOP20e« Fimtf^imKashsnp VW8US Resnondents : SlateofChhatUsgwhlBiclothBts WOT PETmON^IO.1121 F^iUeBar : 6hasiyYadav Vwsus RaBpondents : StetoofGhhaUlsyirhmdrthm's Pcfflomw QmdunSatiiii R"ftPW<|Nl(»' Sftocr ChhrtBaBMti antwwlhw WWrPOTTI<?NN0.173SQf2flB& PeftgOB K(- 8w8GlldWttfe eWoK^MBtogrtiWKtmathap UBUT pBTt'nQMAia.Ba^iKW aaaa PatUton<r R<N>BSiidunlSi aiteaf ehhrtttBganti and NWttwr VWUT PETtTI© N0.2SMOF2Wft .--^- PetUonur Ktirthtm Veous »a*»orChlitiUl8gwhmdwoNiw WraTreTGF(Q(frNO.W8QFaM6 TulaRam Vwa» RasBondarts aatoof GhhatUsauh and ottNn ^^fe •!S WRTT PETn-ICTI NOAMCW ^OOf PsSUonw RwnomtontB Vmsus MI»(MU SW»ofCWiatUaguh and oUw WRIT PETmONN0^82»a»2»W Petitwner : SoonBd * Vwsus Reaxindmte : BlaleofehtaUisgntitBndotti^ WRfT PetWonere : SmfeTljlyBrtmidothais Vfsus Rssoonttonta : StHt»ofeWaB^|n*i«mtWN*hw WW PETITIONWOAW OF 200B PeBUonere : Hari Kaahyapandtmothm' Vnsus Resoondmite : SlalBoKaihalBagirtiaBdanoUim' wrar pEmioN NOJM OFw» Patittoner F&BMBWICtoRl&' Veraus Sum«USNdK Strt* efChhrtfegaite- • •^S^?!":^'- Pmsert : Mr. Satyend»Sahu,Mr. Ashok Vafehnw, Mr. PP.Sahu, Mr. Rakesh Pandey, Mr. Surfl Otwani, Mr. B.R.Ghosh, Ms. Deepali Pandey, Mr. S.K.Dadsena, Mr.K.R.Naw, Mr. P.M.Shriws. coureal ft>r the petitton«r(s). Mr. V.V.S.Moorthy. Deptdy Advoeate Qwwrst wUh Mr. Ajay Dwivedl, Panel Lawyer fwiUw Stata of Chhatfi^nW respondente. OTOER (Passed on 7nofNwember, 2006) The pdfttonere in this bateh of wit prftons aia woridng as pwmanent GmgMan in tt»Public Werte Defartmutt of the Stato ' Govwrommt. These writ petWons hwohn dmWnr faBls and common qvwtton of law, Thus. Uwse writ peBBons are beir^) dlBpoead e( byttte common ontor. ,^» 2. The prtittonars were emptoyed a»permaiwrt Gang kten wittt the F*uMte Works Dapartment of th»6ov»mment The iwtittonere conthwie to work as casual penmnent Gang Mwi s»wshw. Byonter datod2-4^003/24-4-2003, UwState Govwnraent ctocldad to tunrtnato ttwswvicesof IhepeUtioners/Gai^i Men woridng In the PiW&Woris Department elthw on compleBng 30 yeare of swvtee or atlatoiig thB age <rf 80 yews, whichwer was aartier. Pumumt to Ihis orier. tha peUUonere wero frthed from thdr aeivtee wi comptetion cf30 ynr»of swvica. During th»pendency of thea»peUttons, the Stote ©owmnnent, by oidw dated 2'M-2005, ctedded to wUn QSIR^ Men woridng in fts PublteWorteDepartinant on altmning ttw ^r o( 60 yBaraand <todd«t to detetB ttw dausa "reliring th«G«ngMan en comptofen <rf 30yeTs of servtee". Thisorderwasmatteeff»GUvafrom30-S-2005. 3. Aftor hearing tewned eounsd for ttw partiw, it is dear ttiat Vw raqulmment of compteSon ef 30 yw c4 awvtee for th» purpose of rBthwnw* hac bewi detotad with efhet ftwn 30-3^065. Leamed counsel ^ipewing for tha Stats submBs that Uite ordw woald be effBcBva from 30^-2005 and as such Iha ©annMwi, who had alnady reUrad from 30-3-2005, may rwt b»glviwi berwfit (rfthis order. The aigument of taanwd counset i»nottwitdria and the ssm»is not accepted. Pwport of the orctor is qirite ctew and Ufambiguous as B appeare frmn the penaal of the ordar as wellas from the contenlions of Isamedcounsel fcr the peUfonws that the Gfng Men who havs nct comfrteted the ay^ <rf 60 yeare as «i30^-2005. th^ wi»berihwd to contlnue (N1 ttwyaUatn ttie ay of 60 yaan. <t te bilwraed by teunad cajimri for th»peWonws tha* some of th« <Sim8 Iton, wto hwe alroady rrtfrad on compleUon of 30 yews of w»vtee,hw bsea paid reUralbeneBB, l.e., gi'atuWy only. Thte win b* unliaiT, if the pc^onms, who taava rsttred bcfore 30-3-2005 on com^dton rf 30 ywrs of swvto®,ttiough ttwy haw sUH a<mw yam'sto go brtiwBO ywre vfag^ are not fltven bwieflt offte wdw (talad 30-3-2006. 4. For the nasons abaw-alrtBd; ttw iBspoi'wjenta am directedtoaltowdllhe (^ng »ton,who hadwUnd on compWfenofSO yaare of service, but haw not ttalned ttw age ol 80 ywus. to r^oin Uie ssrvfca and conttnue till ttwy attaln the aga cf 60 yean, suhiject to adjusinmnt of the raUral bentfits, if any. ghwn ta> thwn. The rettal ben^Hs, V any, pald earitor be daductod ftom the salaiy of the anptoyee concwmd.in indatlmentealttnnudmwn nteoTSOTfc ofthe satary. 5. hi some <rf the writ prtBtons, tto pdittonen hw»pn^ed for reguhiriaaBon of ttw swvtee as Gang Mui. Leamad caunsel appwring for the petBtonws submit that the arid pnqiw ba dtemiaaod as not press«t at prasent Howevtir, liberty b»grantBd to tt» petiUonws to raistt ttw issus of ragulariadon bafon th»ap|»opriato fbrum, ff nacsBsary. Th»writ peUUons vrith rogarel ta>tha payer of r^luhmzaBon aro dismissed as not P«BSS«IvSh Itowty to the peUtkmeFS to rarfse ths disput* sesMng wdnssirt of ths rriiaf of regtrtartaaUon> if iwcesswy, before the ap|MX>|»iateforum. 6. lnvtowofthef6r«golng,thewi(tprtiBon»slandrihwmdto the axtant indfeatBd abov®. The rsspondwils •re (urthw dlrectBd te compty with this onter within a period of two months frem fte date o( reGeiplfeommunicatton<rfthisontor. NooTdamtoeorta. .A-. 7. A eopy of this order be ptaBe«t on th®ncord of the connactodwritpdUons. — Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Ooiid