IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 19TH JANUARY 2010 / 29TH POUSHA 1931 RP.No. 1145 of 2009(N) --------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.21580/2009 Dated 31/07/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS IN THE WPC: --------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF GOVERNMENT EXAMINATIONS, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, POOJAPURA, TRIVANDRUM. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ALUVA. BY SRI.P. NARAYANAN, GOVERNMENT PLEADER . RESPONDENT/PETITIONER IN THE WPC: --------------------------------------- RITHA THOMAS @ ANNIE RITHA KARUKAPRAMBIL, KARUKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, PONETH SOUTH ROAD, CHILAVANNUR, COCHIN -20. BY MR.K. JAJU BABU, ADVOCATE. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------------------- R.P.No.1145 OF 2009 IN W.P.(C) No.21580 OF 2009 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of January, 2010. O R D E R This review petition is at the instance of the respondents in the writ petition. The writ petition was disposed of directing the 3rd respondent to take appropriate action as required for by the petitioner for effecting change of name. 2. The review petitioners are relying upon Annexure-A order dated 24.05.1985 to contend for the position that it is for the Tahsildar to grant permission for publishing the Gazette Notification. 3. The writ petition was disposed of after hearing the learned Government Pleader appearing for the review petitioners also. Annexure-A order, at any rate, cannot supersede the statutory rules. The same mainly deals with change of name of community etc. In that view of the matter, there is no apparent error in the judgment. Therefore, this review petition is dismissed. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp