IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 22336 of 1997 Between: G.V.N. Ramachandra Raju S/o Appalaraju, 40 years, R/o Payakaraopet, Vizag District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Regional Transport Authority Rep. by its Secretary, Visakhapatnam. 2. The Deputy Transport Commissioner and Secretary, RTA,Visakhapatnam. ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the1st respondent in attaching the condition, subject to the permission of the Transport Commissioner under Rule 258(2)(ii) of A.P. Motor Vehicle Rules, in his order dated 14.3.1997 in item No.79, in R.No.888/A3/97, as illegal and arbitrary and direct the respondents to issue the permit on the extended route on Mangavaram to Pentakota in continuation of the existing route Tuni Market Centre to Mangavaram. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.RAJAGOPALA CHARY Counsel for the Respondents: G.P. for Transport The Court made the following: ORDER: It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the subject matter of this Writ Petition has become infructuous. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. ____________ 22-03-2005 kvrm To 1. The Regional Transport Authority Rep. by its Secretary, Visakhapatnam. 2. The Deputy Transport Commissioner and Secretary, RTA,Visakhapatnam. 3. 2 CCS to G.P for Transport, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 4. 2 CD copies.