-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 112 OF 2009 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 407 OF 2008 Ispat Industries Ltd. ... Appellants versus M/s. Baby Samuel & Co. ...Respondents Mr. S.K. Srivastav with Ms. Manorama Mohanty, instructed by M/s. S.K. Srivastav & Company, for the appellants. Mr. Ruchi Tolat, instructed by M/s. L.C. Tolat & Co., for the respondents. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & R.V. MORE, JJ. DATE: DECEMBER 17, 2009. P.C. This appeal arises out of proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. At the time of hearing of this appeal, it is submitted by both the learned counsel appearing for the parties that they have settled the dispute. The consent terms duly signed by the appellants and the respondents and their Advocates are placed on record and marked “X” for the purpose of identification. The undertakings contained in clauses 3, 4, 6 and 7 are accepted. Parties to act as per the consent terms. The impugned orders are set aside in view of the consent terms. Appeal stands disposed of accordingly. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. R.V. MORE, J.