HIGH ¢OURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT ELASPUR W. P45} No. 2263 of 2007 P€titionet Karmu Ram Bhagat, Slo Shri Budhram, aged about 42 years, Working as L.D.T. (Trib.Dep.) Govt. Primary Scheol. Be‘wnga, Block- Kunkuti, DistL- Jashpur (C,G.) Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh. Thfough Secretary, Tribal welfare Department. Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (0.6.) 2. Commissionev, Tribal wekfare Department, pt R.SS. University Campus Raipur, District— Raipur (C.G.) 3. Asst. Commissisner, Tribai weifare Department. Distt - Jashpur (C.G.) SB: Hon‘ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri Present: Shri Amit Kumar Shanna, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arvind Dubey, Pane! Lawyer for the respondents. ORDER (Passed on this 12’“ day-of April, 2007) 1. The question of law involved herein. asto whether the petitioner is entitied to reuiar pay scaie w.e.f. the date of initiai appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in W.P.(S) No. 5742/2006 (Medan Singh Vs. state of Chhattisgarh & others), which was allowed vide order dated 27‘“ October, 2006. 3. ln view of the above-stated submission. made by learned counsel for the parties. the writ petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. f; Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur