Crl. Misc. No.M-28960 of 2010 ::1:: IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-28960 of 2010 Date of decision: 29.11.2010 Jasveer Kaur .. Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .. Respondent Present:- Mr.Rahish Pahwa Dudeja, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.M.C.Berry, Addl.A.G., Punjab. * * * * S.S. SARON, J. Learned counsel for the State on instructions from ASI Harbans Singh, Police Station Raikot, District Ludhiana (Rural) has submitted that earlier a case was registered against the petitioner i.e. FIR No.160 dated 08.09.2007 for the offences under Section 420 and 120-B IPC. However, no other case has been registered in District Ludhiana. The petitioner was married to Harpreet Singh in the year, 2006. Her husband was working with some of his friends and relatives before their marriage. A dispute arose between the husband of the petitioner and his friends as also his relatives. Accordingly, case FIR No.160 dated 08.09.2007 is registered at Police Station Raikot for the offences under Sections 420 and 120-B IPC against the husband of the petitioner as well as the petitioner. The Criminal Miscellaneous No.M-19614 of 2010 has been filed in this Court for quashing the FIR. The said petition is now listed for hearing in the month of January, 2011. Crl. Misc. No.M-28960 of 2010 ::2:: According to the petitioner, it is because she has been pursuing the cases which have been filed against her husband, his friends and relatives have got annoyed with her and they have threatened to implicate her in some case. Learned counsel for the State as already noticed has submitted that no fresh case has been registered and therefore, it is submitted that apprehension of the petitioner is unfounded. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of with the direction that in case the petitioner is sought to be arrested in any criminal case in respect of the dispute between her husband and his friend as also his relatives, then the petitioner shall be given three days' notice in advance before arresting her. This order shall remain operative for four months. (S.S. SARON) November 29, 2010 JUDGE sukhpreet