THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4603 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioners filed O.S.No.56 of 2004 in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Adoni for the relief of declaration to the effect that the decree in O.S.No.107 of 1989 passed by the same Court on an earlier occasion is not binding upon them and for other ancillary reliefs. The trial of the suit commenced and the recording of evidence on behalf of the petitioners was concluded. When D.W.1 was deposing as a witness, the petitioners confronted him with the alleged agreement of sale, dated 22.10.1986. Through docket order, dated 14.06.2010, the trial Court refused to take the document on record. The same is challenged in this revision. Heard Sri R.Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri B.Vijaya Bhaskar, learned counsel for the respondents. In case the petitioners wanted to rely upon the alleged agreement of sale, dated 22.10.1986, either to support their claim or to confront the witnesses to be examined by the respondents, they ought to have brought the document on record in the course of their evidence. Admittedly, the document was not marked in the evidence of the petitioners. For the first time, it was confronted to D.W.1. It is only when a defendant’s witness admits the execution of the document that it can be put to him for the first time. Obviously, keeping this principle in view, the trial Court rejected the document, when D.W.1 did not admit its execution or other aspects. Though the order of the trial Court is bereft of any reasons, it cannot be found fault with, since the order came to be passed in the course of proceedings and not even on an application. Hence, the civil revision petition is dismissed. It is, however, left open to the petitioners to bring the document on record through process known to law and to take further steps. If an application is made in this regard within one week from today, the trial Court shall pass orders within another week thereafter. At any cost, the matter shall not be adjourned beyond two weeks for this purpose. Since the suit is of the year 2004, the trial Court shall endeavour to dispose of the same as early as possible and not later than 31.12.2011. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:20.06.2011 kdl