IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.59 OF 2004 Mr. Sanjaykumar Damodar Surve ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others. ... Respondents Mr.Sameer Vaidya for the petitioner. Mr. A.H. Palekar, Assistant Government Pleader for the State. Mr. A.A. Garge for the respondent No.5. Mr. V.M. Thorat for the respondent Nos.2 and 7. Mr. G.S. Hegde for the respondent Nos.3 and 4. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 11TH JUNE, 2009 P.C.: It has been brought to our notice that there was no interim order passed in this PIL and in the meanwhile the residential complex has been constructed by respondent No.7 and the Allottee/ members are living in the said premises. Be that as it may, we leave it for respondent Nos.3 and 5 to examine the matter at their own level and pass appropriate orders if there is any violation of the Act. Public Interest Litigation is disposed of. No order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.