1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 210 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 210 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 210 OF 2006 Mr. Mahesh Suresh Khamkar ... Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. R.D. Pathak for Petitioner. Mr. R.G. Mane, A.G.P. for R. No. 1. Mr. R.A. Rodrigues for R. No. 2. Mr.N. Gawade for R. No. 3. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : APRIL 03, 2006 DATED : APRIL 03, 2006 DATED : APRIL 03, 2006 P.C. . The Petitioner was declared passed on revaluation in the first semester. In so far as second semester is concerned, the Petitioner has failed in two out of four subjects. It is the case of the Petitioner that on the result of the revaluation of the first semester, he sought admission for second year L.L.B. The third semester i.e. second year L.L.B. commences in June and Fourth semester in December. The Petitioner has approached this court only in 2 January, 2006. The learned counsel relies on earlier orders of this court. On behalf of the University, their learned counsel points out the Minutes of the meeting held on 1.3.2006. Even considering these minutes, in the instant case, as the Petitioner has neither kept terms for third semester and approached this court only after 4th semester commenced, we do not think this to be a fit case for this court to exercise our extra ordinary jurisdiction. Hence, Petition rejected. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.)