*1* 46.ca1613.10.sxw skt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1613 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 23270 OF 2010 Shri Bajirao Bhau Kamble ..Applicant -Versus- Sou.Pournima Bajirao Kamble ..Respondent .......... Mr.A.S.Patil for the Applicant. None for the Respondent. .......... CORAM : K.K. TATED, J. DATE : 7TH FEBRUARY 2011. P.C. 1 Heard learned counsel Mr.A.S.Patil appearing on behalf of the applicant. None for the respondent. 2 This civil application is preferred by original plaintiff for condonation of 128 days delay in preferring the second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 18th January 2010 passed by the learned District Judge, Sangli in Regular Civil Appeal No.66 of 2003. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that for want of knowledge about the judgment and decree dated 18th January 2010, the delay of 128 *2* 46.ca1613.10.sxw days in preferring the present second appeal occurred. He submits that their advocate in Appellate Court fails to inform immediately about the dismissal of Regular Civil Appeal No.66 of 2003. 3 Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant and the averments made in the civil application, the civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), which reads as under : “(a) The delay of 148 days occurred in filing this Second Appeal may kindly be condoned.” 4 The civil application is disposed off accordingly. ( K.K. TATED, J.) -