IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1363 of 2008 NASIM AHMAD, son of Akhtar Imam, resident of Village & Post Chiksi, P.S. Sigori, District Patna. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary, Minor Irrigation Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Chief Engineer(W), P.H.E.D., Patna. 3. The Executive Engineer, P.H.E.D., Jehanabad Division, Jehanabad, Gaya. 4. The Superintending Engineer, P.H.E.D., Gaya Division, Gaya. 5. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. ---Respondents ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr Md. Nadim Seraj & Mr. Shailesh Kumar, Advocates For the State : Mr Sanat Kumar Mishra, A.C. to G.A.2 For the Accountant General: Mr S.M. Ehtesham, Advocate --------------- 2. 3.5.2010 A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. A copy of the same has been served on the learned counsel for the State as also the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is that he is not receiving the revised pensionary benefits after the grant of Assured Career Progression (ACP) as per the order contained in letter No.1400 dated 2.12.2006 as also the Office Order contained in Letter No.190 dated 28.2.2007, as contained in Annexures 2 and 3 respectively to the supplementary affidavit. It is further submitted that the petitioner has also not received the due amount of group insurance. Learned counsel for the State submits that the grievances of the petitioner shall be considered at the earliest as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner had represented his 2 grievances earlier, however, for expeditious disposal of the aforesaid grievances, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Executive Engineer, P.H.E.D., Jehanabad Division, Jehanabad, Gaya (respondent no.3). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of the aforesaid grievances as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, respondent no.3 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances raised in his representation may be settled at the earliest and the necessary sanction order, if any, may also be sent to the Accountant General, so that the revised pension payment order (PPO) could be issued. As regards the claim for group insurance, the same shall also be examined and if found admissible, the same shall also be paid with interest permissible under the rules within the aforesaid time. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)