1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR C.A. No. 5626 of 2008 In First Appeal No. 916 of 2008 Vijay v. Smt Hakimabi and ors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Mr S.W. Sambre, Adv for appellant Mr B.S. Deshpande, Adv for respondents Coram : A.P. Bhangale, J. Dated : 1 st December 2009 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for appellant prays for more time since, according to him, appellant is trying to arrange for funds. Learned counsel for respondents states that appeal itself would not be maintainable in view of the proviso to Section 30 of the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 which requires employee to produce certificate from the Commissioner to the effect that appellant has deposited with the Commissioner an amount payable under the order appealed against. 2. In view of the mandatory provision, by way of last chance, appellant is granted four weeks’ time to deposit the amount and produce certificate. On his failure to do so, appeal shall 2 stand dismissed automatically without reference to the Court. Judge. Hsj