THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.12658 of 2010 ORDER: In this writ petition, petitioner, who is a Constable (Driver) and who worked earlier in the third respondent academy, seeks a mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in taking steps for his dispossession from Quarter No.F1/4/3, Type-I, SVPNPA, Hyderabad, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner was appointed as a Rifle Man at Assam Rifles, Shillong, Meghalaya State. He was on deputation to the third respondent academy for a period of three (3) years. After expiry of the said period, he addressed a letter, dated 04.09.2009 to the first respondent requesting for extension of deputation period, but no orders were passed thereon. Earlier, he approached this Court in W.P.No.21114 of 2009 and obtained interim order, dated 18.02.2010 in WPMP.No.58 of 2010 for his continuance in the third respondent academy, but on filing WVMP.No.980 of 2010 by the third respondent academy, this Court on 08.04.2010, while accepting it’s plea that the petitioner was already relieved on 30.09.2009 and the allowance of Rs.25,883/- was deposited in his account towards travelling allowance, vacated the interim order, dated 18.02.2010. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the respondents are taking steps for his dispossession from the quarter allotted by the third respondent academy and he seeks continuance therein. When the matter came up for admission on 07.06.2010, it was adjourned to today to enable the learned counsel appearing for the respondents to get instructions with regard to the availability of quarters. Today, on instructions, it is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents that in the place of the petitioner, some other Constable was posted and there is a shortage of quarters to accommodate the employees of the third respondent academy. The petitioner was relieved from the academy as early as on 30.09.2009, as such, the petitioner cannot be allowed to retain the quarter for any further period. For the aforesaid reasons, I do not find any merit in this writ petition to grant relief to the petitioner as prayed for. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 8th JUNE, 2010. kvni