IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 16TH JULY 2010 / 25TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 22307 of 2010(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. GANESAN.V, S/O.VEERAN, MANTHAKKAD, CHITTOOR P.O., PALAKKAD DIST. 2. PONNUSWAMI.A, S/O.ARUMUGHAN.C, MUNICIPAL QUARTERS, CHITTOOR P.O., PALAKKAD. 3. RAVICHANDRAN.S, S/O.SHANMUGHAN, PARITHIKKAVU, THATHAMANGALAM P.O., PALAKKAD DIST. 4. MANI.S, S/O.SUBRAMANIAM, ARYAMPALLAM, CHITTOOR P.O., PALAKKAD. 5. RAMESH.A, S/O.APPASWAMI, CHENTHAMARA NAGAR, MUNICIPAL QUARTERS, THATHAMANGALAM P.O., PALAKKAD. 6. RAMESH.K., S/O.KITTAN, CHENTHAMARA NAGAR, THATHAMANGALAM P.O., PALAKKAD. 7. VALLIAMMA.A, D/O.APPASWAMI, NELLIKKODE, THATHAMANGALAM P.O., PALAKKAD DIST. 8. VALLIYAMMA.K., W/O.KUPPASWAMI, CHENTHAMARA NAGAR, THATHAMANGALAM P.O., PALAKKAD. 9. MANIKANDAN.S, S/O.SHANMUGHAN, MANTHAKKAD, MUNICIPAL QUARTERS, CHITTOOR P.O., PALAKKAD DIST. WPC NO.22307/2010 10. BAIJU.S, S/O.SOMAN, NELLIKKODE, THATHAMANGALAM P.O., PALAKKAD DIST. 11. MURUKESAN.A, S/O.ANKAPPAN, MANTHAKKAD, CHITTOOR P.O., PALAKKAD. 12. PRAKASAN.M, S/O.MURUKESAN, THUDUKKODE, THATHAMANGALAM P.O., PALAKKAD. 13. BALAN.A, S/O.ANKAPPAN, MANTHAKKAD, MUNICIPAL QUARTERS, CHITTOOR P.O., PALAKKAD DIST. 14. PADMANABHAN, S/O.ARUNACHALAM, THEKKEGRAMAM P.O, CHITTOOR, PALAKKAD DIST. 15. JAYAKUMAR.M.S., S/O.MANI, MANTHAKKAD, CHITTOOR P.O., PALAKKAD. 16. SIVADAS.A, S/O.APPUKUTTAN, H.NO.7/183, VADAKKETHARA, CHITTOOR P.O., PALAKKAD. 17. SANTHAKUMARAN, PERUMKODE, THATHAMANGALAM P.O., PALAKKAD DIST. 18. CHITHRA RAJAN, W/O.RAJAN, THOOMBICHIRA, THATHAMANGALAM P.O., PALAKKAD DIST. BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR SMT.P.A.ANITHA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. CHITTUR-THATHAMANGALAM MUNICIPALITY, MUNCIPAL OFFICE, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD DIST., REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. SECRETARY, CHITTUR-THATHAMANGALAM MUNICIPALITY, MUNCIPAL OFFICE, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD DIST. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.22307 of 2010 (K) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 16th day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioners claim to be CLR workers engaged by the respondent Municipality. According to the petitioners, in view of Ext.P1, which has been implemented by the Palakkad Municipality by Ext.P5, they are entitled to similar treatment and regularisation. It is seen that they have made this claim by Ext.P2 and other representations before the 1st respondent. Orders on the representations have not been passed and therefore, the writ petition has been field. 2. The claim of the petitioners for regularisation is yet to be considered by the 1st respondent and in view of the pendency of Ext.P2 and other representations, which are claimed to have been filed, I direct the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders thereon. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the 1st respondent for compliance. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg