IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 23893 of 1996 Between: Grampanchayat of Kambhampadu Village, Rep. by its President Gandham Venkanna Chowdary Kambhampadu Village, A.Konduru Mandal, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Krishna District Cooperative Central Bank, Rep. by its General Manager, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. 2 Krishna District Cooperative Central Bank, Rep. by its Branch Manager Kambhampadu Village, A. Konduru Mandal, Krishna District. 3 The District Collector Machilipatnam, Krishna District. 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer A. Konduru Mandal, Krishna District. 5 Dara Venkateswara Rao S/o Rama Narasimham R/o Kambhampadu Village, A. Konduru Mandal, Krishna District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd and 4th Respondents herein to forthwith complete the resurvey ordered by 3rd Respondent for which notice was served on the petitioner on 20-10- 1996, and also directing them to implement the orders passed under the Land Encroachment Act in the year 1987 and for a consequently direction to the Respondent 1 and 2 not to occupy the premises under dispute which was constructed by the 5th Respondent and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.N.NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN Writ Petition No. 23893 of 1996 Order: Since none appeared for the petitioner on 19.03.2009, this writ petition was directed to be posted for dismissal today. Today, though the writ petition is listed under the caption “for dismissal”, neither is the counsel for the petitioner present nor is there any representation on his behalf. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. __________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J. Date: 23.03.2009 Nsr