19 (Sr^ •^-v-o^ (. •,..•>> IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR(C.G.) WRIT PETITION N0 &cs7 /2005 PEnTIONERS rt-> ./' ^.^r^ ^•^Ky ^>'3%^ *? //^^ ?-"A'^->>" €^yr ^^ \i 2) yi 4) -5) /6-) 7) Smt. Sujata Behara, W/o. Shri Shiv P.Behara, aged about 28 years, Occupation- Owner of Photocopy Shops, R/o. Collectorate Campus, Raigarh (C.G.) Prashant Mukherji, S/o. Shri Manoranjan Mukherji, aged about 50 years, Occupation- Owner of Mini Restorent (Jalpangrih), R/o. Collectorate Campus, •Raigarh (C.G.) Rupnarayan Thakur, S/o. Shri Ganga Sing Thakur, aged about 50 years, Occupation- Owner of Pan Center. Collectorate Campus, Raigarh (C.G.) Sunau Ram Thawait, S/o. Shri Gangaram aged about 55 years, Occupation- Owner of Pan Center. Collectorate Campus, Raigarh (C.G.) Shyam Singh Rajput, S/o. Shri Jwala Prasad, aged about 35 years,; Occupation- Owner of Pan Center. Collectorate Campus, Raigarh (C.G.) Ram Lal Sahu, S/o. Shri Laxman Prasad Sahu, aged about 36 years, Occupation- Owner of Pan Center. Collectorate Campus, Raigarh (C.G.) Mithilesh Kumar Sahu, S/o. Shri Jagat Ram Sahu, aged about 25 years, Occupation- Owner of Pan Center. Collectorate Campus, Raigarh (C.G.) Vs. RESPONDENTS ,-t) State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, General Administration Department, DKS Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). 2) Collector, Raigarh (C.G.) WRFT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 an^^TW R;iW3n^T ^iWfflStT ~[),.<s; „<-. /^ •'.>?• 3'5T ^TRIcTq', ESTti'M'Ko, teTRigT . U3.^>.r5^V7, *TW?TTa)t(|i* /' w[ 2005 an^T^RnwfffitT 15-7-2005 Mr. Satish Chandra Venna, cjiunsel for the petitionere. Mr. Sandeep Dubey, Govt. A^lvooate for the State/respondents. Heard both the counsel. The petitioners' grievance jn to each of them for running their Raigarh, and now by the impugned [small shops in the premises of Colleotorate, |r(otice, the Collector, Raigarh, has asked them to vacate that place. While refemng to the order 4f the Collector Annexure P-1 , learned counsel for the petitionera argued that the h|lunioipal Coporation, Raigarh, has oonstructed certain shops outsye the premises, dlrected the petitioners to apply fori days' time to vacate which is a veryj faots and circumstanoes of the casd «bl<l|fd<ifl-l WHvK ^' fS^S (fsiTZTC ^sri^Hsn^i argued that the petitionere have co|lected the applications and they are going to apply for regular allotment of those ^hops, but, sinoe the Collector has given seven their shops sinoe last 35 years, ther^fore, the period for vacation be extended till the allotment of regular shops. Having heard learned couns]el for the petitionere and having regard to the petitioners for vacation of the said spface is extended till the declsion on applications for regular allotment of newly cc|nstructed shops is taken by the Municipal Corporation, Raigarh. The Munici(}al Corporation, Raigarh, should consider and his writ petition is that some space was allotted of Collectorate building and the Collector has regular allotment of those shops. He further short time for the petitioners who are running time granted by the Collector, Raigarh, to the allotment of newly constructed shops to the decide the applioations for regutar| petitioners, as early as possible. With the above directions, th^ petition stancte disposed of. In view of this order, M.(Wj)P.No.2519/2005 and I.A.No.5879/2005 stand disposed of. Parties are entltled for oertifif oopyofthisorder. Sdl- ^^adoo