1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5665 OF 2006 [ Uttam Punjaji Gaware Vs. The State of Mah. and others.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri.S.B.Talekar,Advocate for Petitioner Shri V.B.Ghatge,A.G.P.for respondent No.1 and 3. Shri H.B.Dhage,Advocate holding for Shri S.T.Shelke,Advocate for respondent Nos.2,3,and 5 .... CORAM: NAARESH H.PATIL AND K. K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 22ND JULY, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Due to efflux of time and as the elections are over no interference is called for. The learned counsel for petitioner submits that issue of validity of the provisions of law petition 2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders considered. 3. In the light of the subsequent developments the said issue becomes academic. 4. In case the petitioner is aggrieved and desires to raise such challenge, if the cause of action arise in future, the petitioner is entitled to do so. The petition is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- Sd/- [K.K. TATED,J.] [NAARESH H. PATIL,J.] MTK