1 75711 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 757 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5044 OF 2007 Mirza Mohomed Zakir Gafoor Baig ...Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Noel Pinto i/by M/s. M.P. Vashi & Associates for the Petitioner Mr. C.R. Sonawane, A.G.P., for Respondent No. 1 Mr. N.R. Bubna for Respondent No. 2 CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR AND R.Y. GANOO, JJ. DATE: 26TH JULY, 2011 P.C.:- The counsel appearing for respondent No. 2 points out that, pursuant to Court order, the matter was examined by the State Government. In the said proceedings, it has been held that the petitioner was responsible to secure employment by committing fraud. Accordingly, the State Government rejected the claim of the petitioner vide order dated 21st April, 2010. That decision has not been challenged 2 75711 before this Court so far. In that sense, the present writ petition, which was instituted on the basis of cause of action which had arisen in earlier point of time, has become infructuous. 2. The counsel for the petitioner prays for time to carry out amendment in the writ petition. It is open to the petitioner to file application as may be advised, which will be decided on its own merits. For the time being, suffice it to observe that the question of expediting hearing of Writ Petition No. 5044 of 2007 does not arise. Even otherwise, it is not possible to give precedence to this writ petition, as other older matters than the present writ petition are pending on the file as per the present assignment, including Supreme Court expedited matters. 3. For the above reasons, this application is dismissed. R.Y. GANOO, J. A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.