IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1117 (S/S) of 2007 Km. Aabida Farukhi D/o Sri Shabbir Ahmad Cane Inspector R/o Sugar Mill, Nadehi District Udham Singh Nagar. ........Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Uttarakhand through the Secretary Vidhyalaya Shiksha Uttarakhand, Dehradun. 2. The Director, Vidhyalaya Shiksha Uttarakhand, Mayur Vihar Dehradun. 3. The Additional Director of Education Garhwal Mandal, Pauri. 4. District Education Officer, Chamoli. 5. The Principal, Rajkiya, Uchattar Madhyamic Vidhyalaya Ghat, District Chamoli. .............Respondents. Shri Jitendra Chaudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 05.05.2007 (annexure-1 to the writ petition), whereby the petitioner is directed to join her duties in her original school i.e. Government Higher Secondary School, Pagna. Petitioner has further challenged the order dated 31.07.2007, copy of which is annexure-10 to the writ petition, whereby the representation of the petitioner has been rejected by the District Education Officer. 3. It appears that earlier writ petition No. 877 (S/S) of 2007, was filed by the present petitioner-Km. Aabida Farukhi, challenging the same transfer order dated 05.05.2007. In fact the said impugned transfer order shows that the petitioner is not being transferred rather she is directed to join her duties in her original school where she is posted i.e. at Pagna. At present she appears to be attached in Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Ghat. In other words, such arrangement means that the petitioner is drawing salary from Pagna but teaching at Ghat. Impugned order does not appear to be discriminatory as it is passed against as many as nine teachers withdrawing their attachment from the convenient places and are directed to join their duties to the places where they are actually posted. As such, the order suffers from no illegality. However, learned counsel for the petitioner pointed out that the petitioner is an unmarried girl and as such, she can be accommodated in any of the places mentioned by her in her representation. In this connection, it was pointed out that the places mentioned in her representation are Nandprayag, Maithana, Thirpak, Bazamgarh, Gauchar, Chamoli, Umtha, Gopeshwar and Karanprayag. 4. This Court cannot exercise executive functions by direction the authorities to post the petitioner at a particular place. The court is not aware of the fact whether there is any vacancy or not. 5. For the reasons, as discussed above, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the order dated 05.05.2007, whereby the petitioner has been directed to go back to her original place of posting from the place where she was attached. This Court further does not find any error in the rejection of the representation of the petitioner vide order dated 31.07.2007. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed summarily with the observation that the petitioner after joining her duties in Government Higher Secondary School at Pagna, may make a fresh representation to the authority concerned for her transfer from there which the authority concerned may consider for redressal of her grievances. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt. 14.03.2008 Sweta