IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST MARCH 2010 / 10TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 11195 of 2010(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- M/S. DEEPA RESTAURANT & TOURIST HOME, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, P.GOPINATHA MENON, AGED 65 YEARS, S/O. NARAYANA MENON, CHANGARAMKULAM, PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JOBY JACOB PULICKEKUDY SRI.ANIL GEORGE SRI.K.S.SUMEESH RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ADDITIONAL EXCISE COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 3. M.RAMACHANDRAN, AGED 63 YEARS, S/O. JANAKI AMMA, MATAYIL HOUSE, TIRUR P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. GOVT.PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 11195 OF 2010 (Y) ===================== Dated this the 31st day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T According to the petitioner, on Ext.P4 application made to the 1st respondent, 2nd respondent heard the parties on 17/2/2010. But however, orders on Ext.P4 have not been passed so far. It is with this grievance, the writ petition is filed. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, on receipt of Ext.P4, the 2nd respondent has heard the parties on 17/2/2010 and orders have not been passed, there is no reason why orders shall not be passed. 3. Therefore, I direct the 2nd respondent that if what the petitioner submits is factually correct, orders on Ext.P4 shall be passed. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible on the production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp