?:^^.s [C—78 w^r^r'^N' ^f^T ^T^T ^4W 's^ '^n^n^pT, ^tii^<i<o, T®t<'ii-y^< *<i*r??ii ^»<ncsi '^200 ^TF^ ^T^F (^f^^^) i^TW^fN^Tit^ ^T^id4l<t '^TST^* ^f^^ TJW^K ^^fN^^ (Sinole Bench; Hon'ble A W.P. (s) No.7180/2008 (Petition U/A 226 PETITIONER bevenc|ra Kumar Mehar, S/o Late Narsing Prasad |Mehar, aged about 49 years, Forest Guardjposted at Range Boro Bit Jaldega, Forest|Division, Raigarh (CG). R/o Boidar MalidigJi, Raigarh (C.G.) Versui RESPONbENT The S Principi Raipuri Present: Mr. Malay Kumar Bhaduri Adv. fc^i Ms. Sunita Jain, P.L. for the Staf 05.01.2009 r. Justice bhirendra Mishra) f Constitution of India) ate of Chhattisgarh, through: the J Chief Conservator of Forest, C&) |r the petitioner. By this petition the peti respondent to consider and petitioner within the specified ioner is praying for a direction to the decide the review petition of the period. Learned counsel for th^ petitioner submits that vide order dated 18.6.2007 the petition^r was terminated by the disciplinary ! authority from the post of Fcrest Guard. The petitioner preferred an appeal against his terminat on before the Conservator of Forest fiuiljjis^^Qi&js'saflctJ^^ ^n S3[-HC~78 5T?^T ^rf^Nr Ti^i^i^iwroT ~?^F'^[Fn^R, 'g^FT^, f^rrey HWWl ^rHI^t •"^200 ^n^i ^^T (^3^^) TOTOi'Hf^sniin considered and decided by the period of two months from the parties, the instant petition petitioner to resubmit a reviev^ is directed to consider and de< QBN^NFT-qmoffi fe^-(f^^n; ^^Rm^T^ 13.12.2007 the petitioner filecj an application for review of order dated 27.10.2007 before the rejspondent herein, however, even after a lapse of more than one year t{^e same has not been considered and decided by the respondent her^in. Learned counsel appearir|g for the State submits that if the petitioner resubmits his revi^w petition before the respondent herein within a period of 15 <jlays from today, the same shall be jconcerned authority within a further ^late of receipt of review petition. In view of the above sdbmission of learned counsel for the s disposed of with liberty to the petition along with certified copy of this order before the respondejnt herein and in turn, the respondent ide the same in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably withih a period of two months from the date of receipt of the review p^tition. Certified copy as per Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge