1 cam.68-2011 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 68 OF 2011 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 35 OF 2011 Ganesh Dnyandeo Bangar .. Applicant. Vs. Hemlata Ganesh Bangar .. Respondent. -------- Mr. Sudhir S. Hardikar, for the Applicant. Mr. A.B. Avhad, for the Respondent. ------- CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE & M.L.TAHALIYANI, JJ. DATED : SEPTEMBER 23, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By this application, the applicant-husband has prayed for stay of the impugned judgment passed by the Family Court dated 28.12.2010. By this judgment, the Family Court has passed a decree of restitution of conjugal rights filed by the respondent-wife. 2 cam.68-2011 3. Mr. Avhad, learned counsel for the respondent-wife makes a statement that the respondent-wife made repeated efforts to join company of the applicant-husband after the decree of restitution of conjugal rights but the applicant- husband did not allow her to join him. 4. On the other hand, Mr. Hardikar, learned counsel for the applicant-husband submits that the applicant-husband did not allow the respondent-wife to join his company as per the decree of restitution of conjugal rights when she tried to enter the matrimonial home forcibly. 5. The applicant-husband has filed an application for seeking access of the child-Purva. In that application, Mr. Avhad, learned counsel for the respondent-wife submits that she has made a statement that she is residing with her parents along with her child-Purva. In view thereof, we do not find it necessary to grant a stay as prayed for in the civil application. 3 cam.68-2011 6. Hence, the civil application is dismissed. Liberty to apply for appropriate reliefs, if circumstances so demand. (M.L.TAHALIYANI,J.) (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)