1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE ORIGINAL SIDE ORIGINAL SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 426 OF 2007 THE NAB WORKSHOP FOR THE BLIND & ANR. .. PETITIONERS Vs. THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GR. BOMBAY & ORS. .. RESPONDENTS Mr. Dilip Taur i/b K. Ashar & Co. for petitioners Mr. P. V. Naik for for R-1 & 2 CORAM:-SMT. RANJANA DESAI & D. B. BHOSALE, JJ. DATED:-24/4/2007 P.C. . The petitioner has inter alia prayed for quashing of Show cause notice dated 14/6/06 and the letter returning the various payments towards advertisement fees dated 16/10/06. . We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2. . We find that the petitioners have submitted a reply to the show cause notice issued by 2 respondents 1 & 2. The said reply has so far not been considered by respondednts 1 & 2. We also find that the petitioners have also addressed letter dated 6/11/06 stating inter alia that they have not cut the trees and there should be a joint inspection of the site. That letter also does not appear to have been considered by respondents 1 & 2. . In the circumstances, the following order will meet the ends of justice; . Respondents 1 & 2 shall pass appropriate orders on the reply dated 28/6/06 submitted by the petitioners to the notice issued by them and letter dated 6/11/06 sent by the petitioners to respondents 1 & 2 within a period of eight weeks from today. The respondents shall communicate the order passed by them to the petitioners. . Liberty to the petitioners to make an application in the meantime seeking permission to put up hoardings. If such an application is made respondents 1 & 2 shall consider it in accordance with law. . Petition is disposed of. JUDGE. 3 JUDGE.