IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9107 of 2011 RADHESHYAM MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.9128 of 2011 ANGAD MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 29.03.2011 Both the above stated petitions arise out of Gopalpur (Rangra) P.S. Case No.248 of 2010 initially registered under Section 394 of the I.P.C., but subsequently converted into 395 of the I.P.C., and accordingly, both the above stated petitions are being disposed of by this common order. Petitioners are not named in the FIR and during course of investigation their name surfaced in this case on the basis that they had some talks on telephone with the driver of the informant. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that petitioner in Cr. Misc. No.9107 of 2011 is full brother whereas petitioner in Cr. Misc. No.9128 of 2011 is “Phuphera” brother of the above stated driver of the informant. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as 2 submission of the parties, let the petitioners, namely, (1) Radheshyam Mahto and (2) Angad Mahto be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge, II, Naugachhiya (Bhagalpur) in connection with Sessions Trial No.98 of 2011 arising out of above stated Gopalpur (Rangra) P.S. Case No.248 of 2010. PN (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)