-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4195 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.4195 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.4195 OF 2006 Noor Mohd. Shah ...Applicant vs. M/s.Parshwa Corporation The State of Maharashtra ...Respondents Mr.Mukesh Pabari for the Applicant Mr.A.S.Shitole, A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : NOVEMBER 27,2006. : NOVEMBER 27,2006. : NOVEMBER 27,2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Not on board. Taken on board. 1. Heard Advocate for the Applicant. The Applicant is an accused in a case under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. By a Judgment and Order dated 21st January 2006, the learned Metropolitan Magistrate convicted the Applicant for the offence under section 138 of the said Act. Being aggrieved by the order of conviction, the Applicant preferred an Appeal before the Sessions Court. By Judgment and order dated 2nd November 2006, the Sessions Court dismissed the Appeal on merits. Being aggrieved by the said orders, the Applicant herein filed a Criminal Revision Application in this Court. By order dated 17th November 2006, the Revision Application has been dismissed by this Court (Coram : -2- S.C.Dharmadhikari,J.) on merits. 2. By filing the present Application under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973, the Applicant is challenging the said order of conviction which is already confirmed by this Court in a Revision Application filed by the Applicant. This Application is nothing but abuse of process of law. No case is made out for interference under section 482 of the said Code. Application is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE