1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.391 OF 2009 Mr.Dashrath Khandu Dhule. ...Petitioner. vs. 1.Kulgaon Badlapur Municipal Council & others. ...Respondents. --- Mr.V.N.Tayade, for Petitioner. Mr.Rajesh Datar, for Respondent no.2. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & K.K.TATED, JJ. DATED: 3rd November,2009 P.C.:- 1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks a direction against the respondent no.1 to remove construction put up by the respondent no.2 which 2 according to the petitioner is illegal. So far as the petitioner is concerned, his only connection with the land and the alleged construction made on that land is, according to the petitioner, that the father of respondent no.2 had entered into an agreement to sale the land to the petitioner and that he has filed a suit for specific performance of that agreement which is pending before the Civil Court. In our opinion, the petitioner is neither the owner of the land nor he is entitled to possession of the land till his civil suit is decreed which is pending in the Civil Court. Therefore, it cannot be said that the petitioner is aggrieved by any construction carried out on the land. The petition has no substance. The petition is, therefore, rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (K.K.TATED, J.)