'IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH g‘gwkx {w s gwgh w.P. No. fa 1242006 '5. Pt. Ravishankar Shukla / University, Through Kulpati Raipur (C.G.) (567) PETITIONER Smt. Gyaneshwary Soni Aged about 43 years W/o. Shri R.P. Soni R/o Block 46/D (200 Unit) Township, Nand‘ini Nagar 4/ Dist. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh WK‘ //Through : Secretary Department of Higher Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chairman Governing Body Nagrik Kalyan Mahavidyalaya Nandini Nagar, District Durg (C.G.) Nagrik Kalyan Mahavidyalaya I W Trust «’31! ‘hg it) 1&u V. 24.;JASJ UR Through : Secretary, Governing Body, Nandini NagarfDistrict / ‘‘1 n;’>\ \ Durg (C.G.) \ mama * tiawgw ,1 t 4. Incharge Principal / Nagrik Kalyan Mahavidyalaya Nandini Nagar, Dist. Durg (C.G.) (2 ) wRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF _ N CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Ix — «’ Shri Ashok Swarnaka'r, 5hri A5. K‘achhawaha! Heard. By This pe'ri‘l'ion under ArTicie 226 of The ConsfiTU‘rion‘of indla fhe pe‘h‘honer challe qes fhe order da‘red d4 1d £005 ' (Annexure—P/9) bv which Th pe‘rmoner has been removed from Ser'VlCe lhe fac‘fs 01' The case re Thai' The neTmoner was apDomTed as AsslsTanT Professor In N qrlk Kalvan Mahawdvainva Nondim -9 1999 (Annexure-P/d) and was nrowslons of granT-In-oud Rules .LT erTisemenTs dafed' 9-7-d00t) '& 20 10 1001') (Annexure-P/7) dpDhcaTIons were Invrred Tor The nos-rs of Assisfan'r Profes or and other vacanf pos‘ts. pe‘h'honer apphed for The same as per Annexure-P/8 Inferwew held on d9 10 dO Is apnaren‘r from 1'he removal order (Annexure-P/9) _ .LT Ts nomTed ouT ThaT agamsT The order of removai under Coiiege Code STaTuTe No.28 appeal is,provided. Counsei for The \ pe‘rifioner \ Nagar, Dlsfr'lc? Durg on receivinq The saiary as per‘ Is submm'ed 111a? vude Wye ounsel for fhe pefifioner.- vt Advocafe for me SmTe. Ihe ?he In which she was noT selected which submi'fs ‘l’HaT A he pefifioner has Submi‘r‘red o [nWéfa‘i ) 184 2G06 U \ c o ‘ ' 9 e v \ represenm$inh before 'fhe H )n‘bie Chanceilor fha‘r has'no‘r been decidgd. AT ihis stage, iearnecl counsei'appearing for 1'he Sfa‘re noin'rs ouffha‘i' The peTiTio’ne‘ar may prefer an appeal underThe 5mTu1‘e. Havinq considered The ‘ and maTenia'i oh record, Thé appeai before The compe‘l’e’n'r from foday and on such appeai being submiTted The same shall be considered and decided in acc ordance wiTh law a's expediTiously a geriod of Two moh‘rhs from The dajre teal. -I1’ is made ciear Tha'l' if any pefi‘rioner may avail The remedy n‘ossible preferabiy wifhin a} of producfion/receipf of app grievance vs‘riii remains The gvaiiabie underfhe iaw. disposed of. Consequen‘fiv, M.(W.7).’F‘ of. CerTitied copy as per rt aowr: observafions the ‘pefi'rion‘ sfands Wirh The aforesaid Facts and circums'rances ofeiihe case pefi‘l’ioner is direcfed To submi'i an au‘rhorify wi'l'hin a period of 15 days ‘ ‘ .No.797/2606 aiso .s‘rands disposed lies. Sd/— Fakhruddin Judge ' imam s