IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 28TH OCTOBER 2011 / 6TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 28652 of 2011(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. JAYAKRISHNAN.R.NAIR, S/O.V.K.RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR, AGED 21 YEARS, RESIDING AT KRISHNA PRIYA HOUSE, PALLIPPURAM P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 2. MANEESH KUMAR.I, THOTTATHIL HOUSE, KARUVASSERY P.O., CALICUT-10. BY ADV. SRI.T.MADHU RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 638. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 638. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER .MRS.RAJASHREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: VK WP(C).No. 28652 of 2011(F) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX ---------------- PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1- A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE IST PETITIONER DATED 10.10.2011. EXHIBIT P2- A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR SCRUTINY SUBMITTED BY THE IST PETITIONER DATED 10.10.2O11. EXHIBIT P3- A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 10.10.2011. EXHIBIT P4- A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR SCRUTINY SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 10.10.2O11. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL -------------------------------------- / TRUE COPY / P.A. TO JUDGE VK ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 28652 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of October, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the 4th Semester examination was declared, they had failed in one paper each. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/- [true copy] P.S. to Judge