IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13476 of 2011 Ghanti Sah Versus The State Of Bihar For the petitioner:- Mr. Chandra Mauli Prasad, Advocate. For the State:- Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate, Incharge Additional P.P. ----------- 3. 25.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is an accused in connection with Samastipur Town P.S. Case No. 478 of 2010 for the offence under Sections 363, 366A and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the resident village of Nana of victim Rajnandani Devi wife of the informant Manoranjan Singh and there was love affairs between petitioner and victim prior to marriage of victim and both left the village to perform the marriage age. Only to give undue pressure the petitioner has been falsely implicated on the basis of false story and the petitioner is in custody since 29.11.10. It has also been submitted that it has come in course of investigation in Paragraph 10 and Paragraph 71 that there was love affairs between petitioner and the victim. The learned Additional P.P. opposed the prayer for bail with contention that the victim in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr. P.C. has supported the prosecution case. Taking into consideration the facts and 2 circumstances of the case and the period of the custody of the petitioner since 29.11.2010, let the above named petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with Samastipur Town P.S. Case No. 478/2010. Kamlesh (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.)