^^ HIGH GOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRH'PETITION (C) No. 3205 of 2009 PETmONER M/s. Farm and Forest Products, Surguja, Proprietor Smt. Usha Jaiswal, Aged about 73 vears, Wd/b S.D.Jaiswal, R/o Ramanujganj, Ambikapur, Throu^i: Power of Attomey Holder, Kartikey Jaiswal, S/o Late Shri S.D.Jaiswal, Aged about 50 yeare, R/o Ramanujganj Road, Anibikapur, Surguja District Surguja (CG) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarii Throu^i: Collector, Ambikapur, Surguja, District Surguja (CG) 2. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Ambikapur, District Surguja (CG) WRI'LPETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUnON OF INMA SB: Hon'Ue Shri Satish K. Affnlhotri, J. RESPONDENTS Present: 1. Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate forthe petitioner. Sliri M.P.S.Bfaatia, Dcputy Govenimait Advocate for the State/respondents. ORUER(ORAL) (Passed on Q7ta day of July, 2009) Heard. Learaed counsel appearing for the petftioner submits that the petitioner has already made a representation fumishmg the required information/documeats to the Collector, Surguja on 29.06.2009 (Aimexure P/9) to establish that the petitioner has obtained required license frwa the District Industries Center, Ambikapur, and the license under the Shops and Establishment Act, 1958 is pending consideration. Shri Paranjpe farther subinits that tfaere are perishabie items lyiag in fhe premises in question. He prays fhat Ihe respondents may be .T:5""». directed to open the sealed factory and pemrit the petitioner to carry out his business. 2. Shri Bhatia, leamed Deputy Govermnent Advocate suhmits that fhe pendini representation ofthe petitioner shall be considered anddecided in accordance with law, expeditiously. 3. Having regard to the facts situation ofthe case, since no order has besn passed on fhe representation dated 29.06.2009 (,<!umexure P/9), the petition is premature at fhis stage. 4. Without expressmg any opinion on merits ofthe case, the Collector, Surguja is directed to consider the representation dated 29.06.2009 (Aimexure P/9) and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, on its own merits, as early as possible, preferably within a period of four weefcs Irom Ae date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. 5. Thus, the petition is dismissed. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file a fresh petition, ifso advised, in fhe eveat, eause ofaction survives or a new cause ofaction arises. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge .^—.——J'T