1 ABA 883 OF 2011 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.883 OF 2011 Nandkumar Sadashiv Wavekar .. Applicant. -versus The State of Maharashtra and ors .. Respondents. Mr. Rohan Sonawane, for the applicant Mrs. S. V. Sonawane, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 16th November, 2011 P.C. 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail by an alleged Director of the company which has defrauded several persons all over Maharashtra. Learned counsel for the applicant states that applicant himself has been admitted to anticipatory bail in other crimes, by orders dated 20th December, 2005 and 18th January, 2006. He also states that the other employees of the company have also been admitted to anticipatory bail. He states that to show his client’s bonafides, his client would deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- before the learned trial Court, without prejudice to his rights, within a period of four weeks though the applicant has no concern with any misappropriation. In view of this though the learned APP has strong objection that the applicant being admitted to bail, 2 ABA 883 OF 2011 it is not clear as to why the applicant’s being in custody is required. In view of this, in the event of applicant’s arrest in CR No.62 of 2006, registered at Guhagar Police Station, District: Ratnagiri, he be released on bail on his furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.10,000- with one or more solvent sureties in the sum aggregatingto Rs.10,000/- on the following conditions : i) The applicant shall deposit an amount of Rs. 10,000/- within a period of four weeks from today, before the learned Trial Court, which the learned Trial Court shall invest in the State Bank of India, to earn maximum interest and shall deal with the same at the end of the trial as per result of the trial. ii) The applicant shall make himself available on 21st January, 2011 at 10.00 a.m. for interrogation by the Investigating Officer and thereafter as and when required by the Investigating Officer. iii) The applicant shall also furnish his mobile telephone number and address and other details to the investigating officer. iv) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to 3 ABA 883 OF 2011 dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; v) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the trial Court. vi) The order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if chargesheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre -vs- State of Maharashtra and ors, in S.L.P No.7615 of 2009. vii) Application stands disposed of. (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)