C^l^'^-— IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.') WRIT PETITION (St N0. 4-^ OF 200^7 PETITIONER .s' ..>nN~;- ^% ^^^- ^yK^ ./'',:<><^y (^•V^\^ ^^y «• y RESPONDENTS sx^' .A- ^ ^ Duryodhan Sao, aged about 37 years, Son of Shri Narottam Sao, Presently posted at Govt. Primary School Paraskol, Block Basna, District Mahasamund (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of School Education, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The District Education Officer, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.). 3. The Block Education Officer, Basna, District Mahasamund (C.G.). WRLT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE ORDER/ORDERS, DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS. \w^ HI6H COURT OF CWWmSGMM AT SXLASWtt SIN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. &4TISH K. AWDWTKl. J. WRFT PETTTION (S.) No.458 OF 2007 Petitioner : &uryot ian Sae versus Resoondents State of Chhuttisgnrh and o'thers WRTT PFTmON (5.1 No.-»9OF 2007 Petitioner : Nersingh unte verais Resoondents Stdte of ChhatHsgarh <nd o'thers Petitioner WRTT PETmON (S.) No.460 OF 2007 Malikr'am Nog versus Itesoondents Stwte of Chhottis9CB"h and olhers WOT PETmON (5.1 No.461 OF 2007 Petitioner : Bhola Prosad Chauhan VW9US Respondents ; State of Qthattiagarh ond ol+iers WRTT PrmiCW (S.l No.462 OF 2007 Petitioner ; Amarbilas Sao versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and o'thws And WRTT PETmON (S.) No.463 QSt 2007 Petitioner : Ramesh Kumer Patel versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and olhers Present : Mr. P.P. Sahu, counael for the petitwner(s). Mr. Satish 6tyta, Oeputy Sowrnmen* Adwcate for Ihe Stdte/respondents. OR&ER yassed on this 24* Day of January, 2007) Leamed counsel afyearmg for •the portas jointly submit that the facts and question of law invohwd m •the present batch of writ petitions are sqiwrdy covered by -the decision of this Court in 1+ie case of Yadwfmit KUHHIT Wmradw»j vs. Mmiefpat Copponitlon. Oury and anortM^. 2. por 1+w aforementwned reasons, •rtiede writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Cburt in •the nwrtter of yadmmrt' Kumcr BhareshMj (Supro). subjed' to vwification of the frct as to u^iether the petitioners have acquired B.TJ. Certificates at their own snses as per the circulars doted 24-12-1998 ond 1-3-1999 and furlher whether -they have been paid -hw advwice mcrementd or not. No order ccs to costs. 3. A copy of •this order be placed on the record <rf the connected writ petitions. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Thdar 1 2006CEE)MPJR-C696