Vs. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Maiii Ram Sahu S/o. KoUiu Raia Sahu, aged about 45 years, residentofViilage Kodabhat, PoUce Station aad Tahsfl Pamgarh, District Janjgir Cham.pa (CG) State of Chliattisgarh, fhrough fhe Secretaiy, Departaient of Engergy, D.K.S.Building, Raipur (CG) The Director Geueral of Police, PHQ, Raipur, Tahsil aud District Raipur (CG) The Chaicmaa, Chhattisgarh, State Electricity Board, Raipur (CG) General Maiiager, Jindal Power Lunited, O.P.Jiadal Super Thermal Power Plant, ViUage aiid Post Tamnar, Tahsil Gharghoda, District Raigarh (CG) The CoUector, Janjgir Champa, District Jaujgir Cbampa (CG) The Sub Divisional OfBcer (Revenue) Pamgarh, District Jaajgir Champa (CG) Station House Officer, PoU.ee Station Paingarh, District Jaajgir Champa (CG) m (SB: Honlale Mr. Satish K. Agailiotri^J.) Shri Shaileudra Dubey, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Prashaat Mishra, Advocate General wifli Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govenunent Advocate for fhe State. Shri A.S.Geharwar, couitsel for respondent No.3. Shri B.D.Guru, Advocate with Shri S.R.J.Jaiswal, counsel for i^spondent No.4. (Passed on this 15th day of November 2007) ^S^^^^Sf^SSS^fS^^I^^^S^S'Sw^ Leamed counsel appearuig for fhe petitioner subinits fb.at fhe petitioner is entitied to corupensation for the land which has been rendered useless on account of erection of High Tension Power Liue. 2. Leamed Advocate General appearing for the State and Shri B.D.Gliru, leamed counsel appearing for respondent No.4 subinit fhat fhe petitioner will be entitled to coiupeusation as determiaed by the CoUector or Coinpetent Aufhority of fhe district. The same will be done witbia two inonths. 3. In view of the clear stateinent inade. by tlie Advocate General and counsel appearing for fhe respondent No.4, fhe learaed counsel appeariug for flie petitiouer subiaits that nofhia^ siuvives iii the inatter at this stage. It is thus, not necessary to go iuto tlie inerits of tfae case. However, if the grievaiice of fhe petitioner survives after deteriuuiation of fhe coinpensation, liberty is reserved to tbe petitioner to challenge fhe sam.e, if so advised. Sugiina 4. Thus, fhe petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge