BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Criminal Jurisdiction) Wednesday, the Second day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD)No.13548 of 2011 P.C.MURALIDHARAN :PETITIONER / ACCUSED -Vs- THE STATE REP. BY 1 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, DINDIGUL. 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. ( CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN ) :RESPONDENTS / COMPLAINANTS For Petitioner : M/S. VEERA KATHIRAVAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER:The Court Made the following order:- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police in Crime No.Not Known of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for alleged offences under sections 147, 471, 465, 468, 406, 420, 120(b) and 506(i) of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner has come up with the present petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2.It is submitted by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, who is instructed by the Inspector of Police, who is present before this court,that the petitioner was involved in two other cases in Crime No.66 of 72 of 2011 He further submitted that in those two cases, the petitioner has already been granted anticipatory bail. Apart from that according to the Inspector of Police, there is no other case pending against the petitioner and no enquiry is also pending. Thus, according to him, the petitioner is not wanted for arrest in any other case. The said statement is recorded Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. sd/- 02/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO: 1.THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, DINDIGUL. 3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. +1CC to M/S. VEERA KATHIRAVAN Advocate SR.No. 37662. RP/04.11.2011/1P/5C. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13548 of 2011 Date :02/11/2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/