IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 11516 of 1998 Between: Mohd. Nagani S/o Mohd. Ismail R/o 22-8-516/2, Purani Haveli, Hyderabad-500 002 ..... PETITIONER AND Union of India, rep. by General Manager Hyderabad Telecom District, Suryalok Complex, Gunfoundry, Hyderabad-500 001 .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to pass appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly a writ of mandmaus, in the nature of direction, directing the respondent Department to restore the telephone connections to the telephone Nos.528137 and 528498 and also direct the respondent department to permit the petitioner to pay the out standing amount in respect of telephone No.528137 in instalments of Rs.5,000/- each per month from April, 1998 onwards in addition to bi-monthly bills in respect of the said telephone. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.PRASAD RAO VEMULAPALLI Counsel for the Respondent: MR.RAMAKRISHNA RAO SIDDANATHI (SC FOR CG) The Court made the following : O R D E R: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter in the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. ------------------------ N.V.RAMANA, J March 11, 2005. BCS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The General Manager, represented by Union of India, Hyderabad Telecom District, Suryalok Complex, Gunfoundry, Hyderabad-500 001 2. Two C.D. copies.