IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.351/2005 Gopal Lal Vaidh S/o Shri Suraj Mal Jain Versus The State of Rajasthan and Another Date of Order ::: 28.05.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri G.K. Jain, Advocate, for Shri Hanuman Choudhary, Counsel for petitioner Shri M.C. Gupta, Addl. Govt. Counsel for respondents #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition for quashing of the order dated 4th April, 2001 passed by the respondents whereby a finding has been recorded against the petitioner under Section 38(1)(b) of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994. The effect of finding remains in force for a period of five years from the date of the order, and that period has now come to an end, therefore, the case of the petitioner is not going to be prejudiced in any manner and the present writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is accordingly dismissing as having become infructuous. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman// IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Misc. Stay Application No.322/2005 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.351/2005 Gopal Lal Vaidh S/o Shri Suraj Mal Jain Versus The State of Rajasthan and Another Date of Order ::: 28.05.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri G.K. Jain, Advocate, for Shri Hanuman Choudhary, Counsel for petitioner Shri M.C. Gupta, Addl. Govt. Counsel for respondents #### By the Court:- Consequent upon dismissal of the writ petition itself, the stay application, filed therewith, does not survive and the same is also dismissed. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//