CRM-M No.3965 of 2011 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CRM-M No.3965 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 16.03.2011 Vinod ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. J.S. Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana for the State. ... Alok Singh, J (Oral). This is an application seeking regular bail in case FIR No.424 dated 22.10.2010 under Sections 323/506/34 IPC Sections 325/302 IPC added later on), P.S. City Sonepat. Learned Assistant Advocate General, Haryana on the instructions of Vijender Singh, Investigating Officer has stated that ten formal prosecution witnesses have already been examined and rest of the witnesses can be examined in the near future. The trial may not take much CRM-M No.3965 of 2011 2 time. She further stated that in case petitioner is released on bail at this stage, there is every likelihood that he may win over material witnesses, who are yet to be examined. As per prosecution story, petitioner alongwith co-accused with common intention caused grievous injuries to Gaurav and Amit. Amit succumbed to head injury. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage. Dismissed. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 16.03.2011 sk.