IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No.619 of 1986 ** For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.A.MEHTA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? 1 to 5 : No -------------------------------------------------------------- MANIRBHAI AMARUBHAI KATHI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: SERVED for Petitioner Ms.S.D. Talati, AGP for Respondent No.1. -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.A.MEHTA Date of decision: 24/12/97 ORAL JUDGEMENT : The petitioner challenges the order dated 13.1.1986, whereby he was issued a notice for compulsory retirement. By way of interim relief, status quo was directed to be maintained and that interim relief was continued while admitting the petition. 2. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner has reached the normal age of superannuation on 30th April 1988. This petition, therefore, has become infructuous and is disposed of accordingly. Rule is discharged. -oOo- karim*