IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 120 OF 2008 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 120 OF 2008 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 120 OF 2008 MANGESH KASHIRAM PALEKAR & ANR. ..PETITIONERS V/S MAHAKALI DARSHAN CO-OP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. & ORS. ..CONTEMNORS Mr. Balasaheb Deshmukh, Advocate, for the Petitioners. None for the contemnors. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 27th March, 2008. DATE: 27th March, 2008. DATE: 27th March, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. In reference to certain enquiry on behalf of the present petitioners a request was made to the Assistant Registrar of Co-op. Societies (Slum Rehabilitation Authority) to give direction to the Respondents to give inspection of certain records on 12/2/2008. The said Assistant Registrar directed the Chairman/Secretary of the Respondents Society to give inspection of the required records on 26/2/2008. The Petitioner contends that inspite of that order the Respondents society has : 2 : not given inspection of the records and thus contempt of the court has been committed. He has not brought to my notice any documents or application to show that he has pointed out non-compliance of the order to the Assistant Registrar. In fact, the Petitioner could make an application to the Assistant Registrar pointing out that his order has not been complied with and he should take further action against the Society. However without taking any steps the Petitioner has rushed to this court by filing this contempt petition. This is not proper. Taking into consideration the above circumstances, I am not inclined to take any action against the contemnors. The contempt petition stands dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)