1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Civil Application No. 2474 of 2011 IN Writ Petition No. 765 of 2002 [Agricultural Produce Market Committee Vs. State of Mah. & others] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. A.A. Naik, Adv., for the applicants. Mr. Dastane, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr. Kankale, AGP for respondent nos. 1 to 4. Mr. C.S. Kaptan, Adv., for respondent no.5. Mr. P.C. Madkholkar, Adv., for respondent no.6. ----- CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATE : 18th October, 2011. Heard. The applicants-proposed interveners have supported the petitioner. Mr. Madkholkar appearing for respondent no.6 is strongly opposing any intervention at this stage. According to him, intervention is 2 coming belatedly and applicants have no locus. The applicants claim that they are farmers. Briefly stated, the Notification withdrawing de-notification of Mahatma Fuley Market as a Notified Market is questioned by petitioner before this Court. The issue is, therefore, already being looked into by this Court. Hence, by permitting the applicants to intervene, the nature of controversy does not undergo any change. Application is, therefore, allowed. The applicants be permitted to be added as interveners. Necessary amendment to petition be carried out by interveners within a period of one week from today. Judge Judge |Hedau|