IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 9467 of 2008. Decided on: 18th December, 2010. Sanjeev Kumar. …Petitioner. -Versus- The State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Lalit Sehgal, Advocate vice Mr. Peeyush Verma, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for the respondents. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): It has come in the reply that the matter is under consideration and the final decision shall be taken by the respondents after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to all the persons concerned. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to take a final decision in the matter, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge November 18, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. - 2 - - 3 -