\ EE THE HZGH CGURE 9F JUDICATURE AT EILAEPUE CHHATTISGARH is“: WP No. OF 2002 No.852310674 Cunstable Shambhu Kumar, CISF aged about 38 years S/Q Late Shri Ram Swarath Singh PreSently R/o Qrt.’N0. 3‘228, Pragati Nagarr Barri, KOREA CHHATTISG$RH V E‘R S U S PETETIO ER 1. Union of India Thraugh Secretary Ministry 0f Heme Affairs New Delhi RESPONDENTS 2. Deputy Inspectar General Central Industrial‘Security Force EaStern Zone Headquartara‘ CISF office Complex, Boring Patliputra; PATNA 800 013 a Road on The Group Cmmmandant Central Induetrial Security Force CISF Office Complex, Boring Read Patliputra, PATNA BOO 013 4. The Deputy Commandant CISF, Airport Security Unit, PATNA 5, The Resistant Commandant CISF, Airpert Security Unit, PATNA 6. Commandant, CISF Korba Super Thermal Power Plant KOREA, CHHATTISGARH /// WRIT PETITION. UNDER £RTICLE 22 227 OF THE CGKSTITUTION OF IEDIA , Union of India & Others Petitioner Qt HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILAS?UR WRIT PETITION NO. 133 OF 2002 No.852310674 Constabie Shambhu Kumar. Versus Respondents WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2261227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) resent :— vShri Dheeraj Wankhede, Advocate for the petitioner. Shr'i Kashif Sakeel, Advocate for the respondents. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 05‘ day of January, 201 1) ‘I. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that during pendenoy of the petition, statutory appeiiate forum has been created under provisions of Rule 46 of Central Industrial Security Force Rules, 2001. The petitioner may be permitted to take recourse to statutory appeal, after condoning delay, as the petitioner was pursuing this petition bonafide. 2. Shri Sakeel, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the respondents have no objection, if the petitioner takes recourse to the statutory appeal, as aforestated. Having considered the above—stated submissions made by the parties, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take recourse to alternative statutory forum that may be available to the petitioner under the provisions of law. lf the appeal is filed within a period of two weeks, the appeal shall not be dismissed on the I» r \ IA l \ , ground of limitation. Sd/— z ‘l i Sau'sh K. Agnihotrill" “‘4 Judge P