IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 14105 of 2006 Between: Pooja Sharan Kaur D/o.Raghuveer Singh S/o.Mohan Singh, aged about 48 years, Occ:Business R/o.7-1-282/C/93, B.K.Guda, Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Prl.Secretary] Department of Higher Education, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The Andhra Pradesh State Council, for Higher Education rep.by its Secretary, Mahaveermarg, Hyderabad-500028 3 All Indian Council for Technical Education, rep.by its Member Secretary, Indira Gandhi Sports complex, IP Estate, New Delhi-110002 4 Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, rep. by its Registrar, Kukatpally, Hyderabad 5 The Convenor, EAMCET-2006, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Kukatpally, hyderabad .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the 9a) paper Notification dated 16.2.2004 issued by the 3rd respondent limiting admission into Engineering Courses including Biotechnology only to those students who have passed 10+2 examination with Maathematics and physics as compulsory subjects (b0 G.O.Ms.No.8 dated 4.2.2006 issued by the 1st respondent as arbitrary, illegal, offending Article 14 of the constitutin of India and consequently direct the respondents to restore Rule 3(6) of Rules in G.o.Ms.No.16 dated 25.2.2004 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.RAVINDER Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 14105 OF 2006 ORDER: 1. This writ petition is listed under the Caption ‘for infructuous cases’. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It indicates that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing this writ petition. 2. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _____________________________ Justice B.Seshasayana Reddy 20th August, 2008. KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 14105 OF 2006 20th Augusts, 2008.