IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 18TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 27TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 22544 of 2011(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ SHOBA BHASKER, W/O.BHASKER SETH, AGED 51 YEARS,PAWAR HOUSE,EAST FORT PO, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER(UNDER SARFAECI ACT),THE IRINJALAKUDA TOWN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., HEAD OFFICE, TANA , IRINJALAKUDA,680 121, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. THE MANAGER, THE IRINJALAKUDA TOWN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., MAIN BRANCH(HEAD OFFICE BUILDING),IRINJALAKUDA 680121, THRISSUR DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.N.P.SAMUEL& ADV. SRI.PLEASANT.T.SAMUEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 22544 of 2011(P) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1 COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SEC.13(2) OF THE SARFAECI ACT DATED 28-6-10 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT P2 COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 4-07-2011 FOR SETTLING THE LOAN UNDER ASWAS 2011 SCHEME SUBMITTED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE MM S.SIRI JAGAN.J --------------------------------- WPC No.22544 OF 2011 --------------------------------- Dated this the 18 th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a defaulter in repayment of amounts due from him to the respondent. According to the petitioner, the petitioner has sought the benefit of a scheme framed by the Government by name “Aswas 2011” , in respect of the loan account. According to the petitioner, the same has not been considered. 2. A counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents in the writ petition, stating that the petitioner's claim would be considered in accordance with law and in the meanwhile further proceedings would not be proceeded with. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to see that the petitioner's claim under the 'Aswas scheme 2011' is considered and orders passed expeditiously. Till orders are thus passed, further coercive recovery proceedings shall be kept in abeyance. S.SIRI JAGAN MM JUDGE