IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.12378 of 2010 Date of Decision : 16.7.2010 Balram Sharma ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present : Mr.Nakul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. MAHESH GROVER, J. The prayer made in this writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is that respondents be directed to appoint an Administrator in village Kotisekhan during the pendency of regular inquiry against respondent No.4 as also during the pendency of preliminary enquiry pending against respondents No.5 to 8 so that they cannot misuse the record of Panchayat. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the considered opinion that the petition is misconceived. It is for the authorities concerned to see as to whether a particular Panch or Sarpanch who is facing inquiry regarding the allegations against him is fit to hold the office in public interest or not. The opinion which is required to be formulated by the concerned authority under the law cannot be taken upon itself by the Court. There is thus no ground to grant the prayer which has been made in the petition. Dismissed. 16.7.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) dss JUDGE