1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 332 OF 2008 Baba Biru Lawate........Appellant versus Subhash Tukaram Nagane.......... Respondent. Mr. M.A. Chaudhari for the Appellants Mr. Ajay Joshi for the Respondent. CORAM: R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 29th September, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties. Admit. Hearing expedited. The following question of law arises for consideration: 1. Whether Sopan, Karta or Manager of Hindu undivided Family has obtained no objection and/or consent from two brother namely Shripat and Amabadas for the purpose of executing sale deed so far as the ½ share which is sold to the respondent (Original Plaintiff)? 2. Whether if Sopal had no right to sale 1/2 portion of suit land out of gut no.134 then whether the respondent can acquire title of the suit property on the basis of sale agreement executed between the respondent and Sopan? ( R.V. MORE, J.) IN 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 852 OF 2008 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 332 OF 2008 Baba Biru Lawate........Appellant versus Subhash Tukaram Nagane.......... Respondent. Mr. M.A. Chaudhari for the Appellants Mr. Ajay Joshi for the Respondent. CORAM: R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 29th September, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. Since the Second Appeal is admitted, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). C.A. Accordingly disposed of. ( R.V. MORE, J.)