IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1069 of 2009 JAY KUMAR SON OF SHRI BIJENDRA SHARMA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KHOKHUNA CHAK SULTANPUR, POLICE STATION FATUHA, DISTRICT PATNA, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT MOHALLA KANKERBAGH, NEAR TIWARI BECHAR, POLICE STATION KANKERBAGH, TOWN AND DISTRICT PATNA. Versus 1. SMT.PINKI KUMARI WIFE OF SHRI JAI KUMAR AND DAUGHTER OF SHRI HARIDWAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ANJANI, POLICE STATION DHANARUA, DISTRICT PATNA. 2. SHRI HARIDWAR SINGH SON OF LATE SHEO BAHADUR SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ANJANI, POLICE STATION DHANARUA, DISTRICT PATNA. For the Petitiner :Mr.Krishna Kishore Sinha,Adv. ----------- 3. 21.1.2010. N.H./ After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the civil revision as the same is not maintainable as per the specific bar under Section 19(5) of the Family Courts Act,1984 has been interpreted by Division Bench of this Court in Jagdish Prasad Chouhan v. Bhuneshwar Chouhan and anr.,reported in 2009(4) BBCJ, 442 holding the civil revisions filed against interlocutory orders passed by Family Courts would not be maintainable. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner wants to avail any other remedy, if available under law to him. In that view of the matter, the civil revision is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J.) - 2 -