1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Application No 2596 of 2009 Kisan Sahare v. State of Maharashtra -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. None for applicant. Mr A. Parihar, APP for State Coram: A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 13th August 2009 1. None for the applicant. Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State. 2. Bail application is opposed on the ground that by a reasoned order learned Additional Sessions Judge has rejected the application vide order dated 15.10.2008. It is also contended that there are eye witnesses’ account involving role of the applicant. 3. Applicant was arrested on the very day of incident. It is stated by eye witnesses Umesh, Jitesh, Vanita and Parasram that applicant had assaulted deceased Shankar by means of knife. Post-mortem notes show that deceased Shankar died due to cerebral compression which resulted from depressed fracture of skull and haemorrhage with brain injuries. Weapon of offence used by the applicant has also been seized during the course of investigation. Prima facie involvement of the applicant is thus clearly seen. If released on bail, apprehension expressed by learned APP 2 cannot be ruled that applicant may influence the prosecution witnesses and tamper with prosecution evidence. Looking to the nature of offence and prima facie involvement of the applicant, this is not a fit case where applicant-accused can be released on bail. Application is accordingly rejected. Judge. hsj