@ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.2778 OF 2009 Tn'bhuwan Ram Verma PETITIONER Versus RESPONDENTS The State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Preseni :- Shri Rakesh Pandey, cnunsei for the petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Advocate General with Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Pane! Lawyer fer the Siaie. ORDER RA (Passed on ihis 6 day of Qc-tober, 29Q9) With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the petition is heard linally. This Court in Suryanath Kushwaha vs. state of Chhattisgarh & Others‘, arising from the same impugned order dated 13~2—2069 (Annexure -— P/1), whereby the petitioner has also been sent on attachment for specific purpose of survey of Abujhmand area, the petition has been disposed of. Shri Thakur, learned Dy. Advocate General appearing with Shri Bhaduri, teamed Panel Lawyer for the State submits that after completion of the specified purpose the petitioner shall be posted on the same place of posting from where he is drawing his salary. ln View of foregoing, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Under the aforesaid circumstances, there is no reason to take different stand in this petition. Accordingly. this writ petition is disposed of on the ground that the/impugned order dated 13-2-2009 is simply an ‘ adjustment for specific purpose of survey of Abujhmand area. The petitioner is drawing his salary from the original place of posting. i Sd/- .Satish K. Agnihotri Judge IWP (8) No.17‘I7 of 2009 (decided on 7-5-2009) ;