IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 26TH FEBRUARY 2007 / 7TH PHALGUNA 1928 WP(C).No. 283 of 2007(H) -------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- K.R. KRISHNAN, KOTTIKKAL HOUSE, CHIRAKKAKODE, P.O. VELLANIKKARA, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR. 3. K.S. ARUNKUMAR, S/O. ARAVINDAKSHAN, KUNNAMPATH HOUSE, KANNARA, ALPARA, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.K.PUSHPALATHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.283/2007 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1:- THE AGENDA OF THE MEETING OF THE R.T.A. DT.19.5.03. EXT.P2:- COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE STAT DT.14.6.04. EXT.P3:- COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.13554/05 DT.16.5.05. EXT.P4:- COPY OF THE OBJECTION DT.10.10.05. EXT.P5:- COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DT.4.10.05. EXT.P6:- COPY OF THE PROCEEDING OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DT. 26.10.05. EXT.P7:- COPY OF THE OBJECTION DT.5.11.05. EXT.P8:- COPY OF THE PROCEEDING OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DT.28.11.05. EXT.P9:- COPY OF THE NOTICE INTIMATING TIME CONFERENCE ON 30.12.05. EXT.P10:- COPY OF THE NOTICE INTIMATING ABOUT THE TIME CONFERENCE ON 21.1.06. EXT.P11:- COPY OF THE NOTICE INTIMATING ABOUT THE TIME CONFERENCE ON 24.2.06. EXT.P12:- COPY OF THE OBJECTION DT.27.2.06. /TRUE COPY/ tss K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR,J. ------------------------------------------ WP(C)NO.283 OF 2007-H ------------------------------------------ Judgment The petitioner challenges Ext.P6 proceedings of the Secretary, RTA, Thrissur dated 26.10.2005 and Ext.P8 proceedings of the very same Officer dated 28.11.2005, concerning the time schedule of the stage carriage KL-8/A-3447 on the route Vellakkarithadam-Kodungallur operated by the third respondent. The challenge against those orders are highly belated. Therefore, this Writ Petition cannot be entertained against them. Accordingly the Writ Petition is dismissed. If the petitioner has got any statutory remedy against those orders, this Judgment will not affect his rights in this regard. 26.02.2007 K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR,JUDGE sta 2