IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDRAJULU CRL.PETITION No. 4 3 1 5 OF 2010 Between: Y. Anjaiah ..... Petitioner V/s. The State of Andhra Pradesh Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. & Anr. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri G. Arun Kumar Counsel for the Respondents: Addl.Public Prosecutor The Court made the following : (Order follows 2nd page) THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDRAJULU CRL.PETITION No. 4 3 1 5 OF 2010. O R D E R : The petitioner-A2 is accused of offences punishable under sections 406, 418, 420 IPC in Cr.No. 175 of 2009 of II-Town Police Station, Karimnagar. Subject matter of the crime is the transaction between Nirmala Gas Agency and Bharath Gas. Ushodaya Enterprises, Products Priya Oil and Pickles. The second respondent, who gave the report is the Manager of Nirmala Gas Agency, owned by his father-in-law. A-1, who is not a party herein is BLGP product incharge of Ushodaya Enterprises at Karimnagar. A-2/poetitioner is Sales Officer therein. 2. It is alleged that there are certain misdeeds in the entries of accounts and transactions to the extent of Rs.9 lakhs and odd. It is further alleged that there is non-supply of oil worth Rs.30,80,000-00. 3. It is contended by the petitioner’s counsel that all the allegations in the report are against A-1 only and not A-2. It is not correct. The report reads that Sales Officer, Anjaiah is also a party to all these transactions. 4. It is next contended by the petitioner’s counsel that A-2 was not working in Karimnagar Office of Ushodaya Enterprises during the relevant time. It is a matter pertaining to question of fact whether A-2 was working at Karimnagar during the relevant period and whether he had any participation in the transactions leading to the offences alleged, these questions cannot be gone into in a petition under section 482 Cr.P.C. I do not find any valid reasons to stall of this crime at its threshold. 5. Hence, the petition is dismissed. ____________________________________ Justice Samudrala Govindrajulu.. 31-05-2010. I s L THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDRAJULU CRL.P.NO. 4 3 1 5 OF 2010 Circulation Entry No. 3 5 Date: 01-06-2010 COMPUTER No. 43 Court Master: I s L