IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 19TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 28TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 14832 of 2010(D) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- P.RAJU, DSA CENTRE, B.S.N.L. T.C.14/508-1, NANDAVANAM ROAD, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, RESIDING AT T.C.14/1150, LENIN NAGAR, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY ADVS. SRI.G.SASIDHARAN CHEMPAZHANTHIYIL SRI.VISHNU S. CHEMPAZHANTHIYIL RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, (SALES & PROMOTIONS), CTO BUILIDING, STATUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 1. 2. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, TELECOM, BSNL, KERALA TELECOM CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 33. R1,2 BY ADVS. SRI.K.KESAVANKUTTY, SC, BSNL SRI.K.KESAVANKUTTY, SC, BSNL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs/ WP(C).No. 14832/2010(D) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO. 31-1/510/94-PHB DATED 03/08/1994 ISSUED BY THE MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS, NEW DELHI. P2: COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO.TR/93/27-A/08-09 DATED 11/07/2008 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P3: COPY OF THE EXPERIENCE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. P4: COPY OF THE BID DOCUMENT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. P5: COPY OF SUBMISSION DATED 06/05/2010 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P6: COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS M.VIJAYAN & CO. DATED 19/06/2010. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE svs/ ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 14832 of 2010 D ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 19th day of November, 2010 J U D G M E N T According to the petitioner, in pursuance to Ext.P4, petitioner made an application for Franchisee ship of BSNL. Aggrieved by the selection, in terms of clause 28 of Ext.P4 bid document, petitioner has filed Ext.P5 before the Chief General Manager of the BSNL. In this writ petition, he seeks a direction to the second respondent to pass orders on Ext.P5 in terms of the provisions contained in Ext.P4. 2. I heard the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent also. 3. Having regard to the provisions of Ext.P4 bid document, if as stated by the petitioner, Ext.P5 has been filed and it has been received and is pending, it is directed that the second respondent shall consider the same, with notice to the parties concerned and pass orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks from the date of W.P.(C) No.14832/10 : 2 : production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge