1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.O.NO.1061/09 IN M.C.A.(Rev.) St.No.18355/09 in W.P.st.949/09. (Rej.W.P.No.352 of 2009) Shri Sadashiv Bapuji Junghare ..vs.. State of Maharashtra and others. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr.G.N.Khanzode, Adv. for the applicant. C ORAM : Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota,J. DATED : 8th January, 2010. This application for condonation of delay is made by the Advocate for the applicant and not by the applicant himself. As such the same is not maintainable. When this is pointed out by Mr.Khanzode, learned counsel for the applicant, he seeks to withdraw the same with liberty to file fresh application. The application is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to the applicant to file fresh application for condonation of delay. JUDGE. chute 2