1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5893 OF 2004 (Shyamsunder Ramkisan Jajoo & Anr. vs. Smt. Sulochanabai wd/o Jaisingrao Rajurkar & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. OCTOBER 04, 2010. Heard Shri Mehadia, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Malokar, learned counsel for respondent No.6. No body appears for other respondents. The perusal of impugned order shows that there is temporary injunction protecting the petitioner – plaintiff. The part of construction then proposed and undertaken by other respondents was stayed insofar as site in dispute is concerned. By passage of time, permitted construction may also be over by now. In this situation, I find that interest of justice can be met with by permitting the petitioner – plaintiff to challenge the said order after final adjudication of Civil Suit, if occasion therefor arises. The Suit is of the year 1999 and remained stayed till date. Hence, with that liberty to the petitioner, present petition is disposed of. No costs. No costs. JUDGE *GS.