IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No 431 of 1993 in SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATIONNo 5363 of 1992 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.R.TRIPATHI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- KANTILAL CHATURBHAI PATEL Versus CHANCELLOR -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR GIRISH PATEL for Appellant Ms.Harsha Devani, learned A.G.P. for respondents Nos.1 and 2. MR SN SHELAT for Respondent No. 3 No one is present on behalf of other respondents -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA and MR.JUSTICE R.R.TRIPATHI Date of decision: 26/09/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT(Per: M.R.Calla,J) Learned A.G.P. submits that this Letters Patent Appeal has become infructuous. This statement is not controverted by Mr.Girish Patel appearing for the appellant. This Letters Patent Appeal is, therefore, dismissed as having become infructuous. Notice is hereby discharged. No order as to costs. (M.R.Calla,J) (R.R.Tripathi,J)