IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM TUESDAY, THE 1ST FEBRUARY 2011 / 12TH MAGHA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 106 of 2011(S) --------------------------------------------- (AGAINST JUDGMENT DTD. 14/10/2010 IN WP(C) NO.28322/2010) PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN WP(C): ---------------------------------------------------------- ABDUL HAMEED MARAKKAR, S/O.A.P.A.K.ICHAVA MARAKKAR, ERAMAKKAVEETTIL PUTHIYAKATH HOUSE, CHETTIPADI POST, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT NO.2 & 3 IN WP(C): ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. K.P.VENUGOPAL (CHIEF MANAGER), THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD., REGIONAL OFFICE, KOZHIKODE, P.B.NO.933-CHAKKORATHUKULAM, WEST HILL P.O., KOZHIKODE. 2. JOSE, THE BRANCH MANAGER, SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD., PARAPPANANGADI BRANCH, POST PARAPPANANGADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI. GEORGE VARGHESE, SC, SIB THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss C.K.ABDUL REHIM,J. ------------------------------- Cont. Case (Civil) .NO. 106 of 2011 --------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of February, 2011 JUDGMENT Heard counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondents 1 and 2. It is submitted that Annexure-A6 notice was happened to be issued without noticing the specific directions contained in the judgment dated 14.10.2010. However it is conceded that no further action was pursued on the basis of that notice. It is also brought to my notice that Annexure -A6 was already challenged in a subsequent writ petition filed by the petitioner. 2. The above submissions are recorded. In view of the facts as stated above, I am of the opinion that the contempt proceedings need not be entertained further. Therefore the Contempt of Court case is hereby closed. C.K.ABDUL REHIM,JUDGE pmn/ 2