1 spb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION MISC. PETITION NO. 13 OF 2009 IN PETITION NO. 929 OF 2008 Smt. Ganga Kishin Matai .. Petitioner. V/s. Mrs. Lina Rahul Parekh (nee Matai) .. Respondent. And Shri Hiroo Matai of Mumbai .. Additional Respondent. --- Mr. Dinyar D. Madon, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pradeep Bakhur and Mr. Ranjit i/by M/s. Ranjit & Co. for the Petitioner. Mr. Janak Dwarkadas, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Zal Andhyarujina, Mr. Jariwala and Ms. Jyoti Ghag i/by M/s. Thakore Jariwala & Associates for the Respondent. Mr. Jaydeep Raut i/by M/s. Pathak Associates for the Additional Respondent. --- CORAM : DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATED : 16TH JULY, 2009 P.C. : 1. During the course of hearing of the Misc. Petition, the 2 learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties have attempted to resolve the dispute amicably on behalf of their respective clients. After extensive discussion between the parties and the Advocates and learned Counsel, the Court is now informed that the parties have agreed to resolve the dispute. Consent Terms have been tendered and are taken on record and marked as “X” for identification. The Consent Terms contemplate an addition of an additional Respondent as a party to these proceedings. All the three parties i.e. the Petitioner, the Respondent and the Additional Respondent are personally present before the Court and have signed the said Consent Terms together with their Advocates. 2. In terms of the request made to the Court, by consent of all the parties, the Additional Respondent is impleaded as a party to the proceedings. Amendment shall be carried out within a period of two weeks from today. 3. There shall be a Decree in terms of the Consent Terms, 3 marked “X”. 4. The Misc. Petition is disposed of in terms of the said Consent Terms. (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.) .....