IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13538 of 2009 Between: Smt. Medaboine Buchamma, W/o. Late Buhi Ramulu, aged about 62 years, Occ: Agriculture & ward Member of GP R/o. Janampally Village, Ramannapet Mandal, Nalgonda District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Nalgonda District, Nalgonda. 2 The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Bhongir, Nalgonda District. 3 The Circle Inspector of Police, Ramannapet, Nalgonda District. 4 The Station House Officer, Ramannapet Police Station, Nalgonda District. 5 Poshaboina Lingaiah, S/o. Laxmaiah, R/o. Janampally Village, Ramannapet Mandal, Nalgonda District. 6 Marsani Narsamma, W/o. Mallaiah, R/o. Janampally Village, Ramannapet Mandal, Nalgonda District. 7 Gattu Narsimha, S/o. Gopaiah, R/o. Janampally Village, Ramannapet Mandal, Nalgonda District. 8 Chelamala Chenna Krishna Reddy, S/o. Narsi Reddy, R/o. Janampally Village, Ramannapet Mandal, Nalgonda District. 9 Chilumala Bhaskar Reddy, R/o. Janampally Village, Ramannapet Mandal, Nalgonda District. 10 Chelamala Padma, W/o. Yadi Reddy, R/o. Janampally Village, Ramannapet Mandal, Nalgonda District. 11 Bontha Neelamma, W/o. Lingaiah, R/o. Janampally Village, Ramannapet Mandal, Nalgonda District. 12 Bontha Lingaiah, S/o. Ramulu, R/o. Janampally Village, Ramannapet Mandal, Nalgonda District. 13 Bontha Yettaiah, S/o. Chinna Mallaiah, R/o. Janampally Village, Ramannapet Mandal, Nalgonda District. 14 Vangala Yadaiah, S/o. Muthaiah, R/o. Janampally Village, Ramannapet Mandal, Nalgonda District. 15 Vangala Yadamma, W/o. Yadaiah, R/o. Janampally Village, Ramannapet Mandal, Nalgonda District. 16 Gattu Yadaiah, S/o. Gopaiah, R/o. Janampally Village, Ramannapet Mandal, Nalgonda District. 17 Gathu Yadamma, W/o. Yadaiah, R/o. Janampally Village, Ramannapet Mandal, Nalgonda District. 18 Medaboina Raghu, S/o. Buchi Ramulu, R/o. Janampally Village, Ramannapet Mandal, Nalgonda District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.C.VENKAT YADAV Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 4: AGP FOR HOME Counsel for Respondent Nos.5 to 18: ----- The Court made the following : ORDER: In this Writ Petition, the petitioner complained of inaction on the part of respondent Nos.1 to 4-Police Officials in dealing with the complaints filed by her against respondent Nos.5 to 18. In response to the notice of this Court, respondent No.4-the Sub-Inspector of Police, Ramannapet Police Station, Nalgonda District, filed counter-affidavit wherein it is stated that the petitioner lodged a complaint on 25- 06-2009 before respondent No.1 stating that respondent Nos.5 to 18 obtained loans from her by executing promissory notes; that when she insisted on repayment of the loan amounts, they started creating nuisance in order to avoid repayment; that on receipt of the said complaint, respondent No.1 forwarded the same to respondent No.4- Police Station; that the said complaint was registered as Crime No.91 of 2009 for offences under Sections 342 and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’); that investigation, so far conducted into the said Crime, revealed that the petitioner, who is liable to pay the chit amount of Rs.10,50,000/- to Accused Nos.1 to 13 therein, came out with a false story to avoid payment of the said amount. He assured that appropriate report/charge sheet will be filed after completing the investigation. He further stated that on 25-06-2009, petitioner’s daughter-in-law viz., Smt.Medaboina Dhanamma, wife of Krishna, lodged a complaint before respondent No.4 stating that on 25-06-2009 between 3 p.m., and 4 p.m., respondent Nos.5 to 18 came to her house and beat her and her sons viz., Sravan Kumar and Sharath Kumar; that as no cognizable offence was made out, respondent No.4 made an entry in the General Diary and filed requisition in the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Ramannapet, for enquiry and; that the said Court granted permission to proceed with the case under Section 323 IPC. Respondent No.4 maintained that except the said two complaints, the respondents-Police have not received any further complaint; that investigation in the said Criminal cases is still pending and; that necessary steps will be taken in this regard. Respondent No.4 denied the allegations that, in collusion with respondent Nos.5 to 18, he is threatening the petitioner and her family members and that he is forcing them to execute the documents to part with their properties. From the averments contained in the above counter affidavit, it is evident that there are serious disputes between the petitioner and respondent Nos.5 to 18 and that the investigation into the two Criminal cases, registered on the complaints of the petitioner and her daughter-in-law, is pending. Respondent No.4 is, therefore, directed to file appropriate charge sheet/report in the said Criminal cases at the earliest. However, the submission of respondent No.4 that he is not interfering in the disputes pertaining to money transactions between the petitioner and respondent Nos.5 to 18 is placed on record with a direction to him not to cause any such interference in future. Subject to the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.17602 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 17th July, 2009 lur