:1: :1: :1: IN IN IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL ORIGINAL ORIGINAL SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION BIFR CASE NO. 141 OF 1991 B.I.F.R. ....Petitioner vs. Tirupati Industries (I)Ltd ....Respondent ------- Mr.Manish Mistry i/by.M.M.Vashi & Co. for the respondents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. 18th 18th 18th January, 2007. January, 2007. January, 2007. P.C P.C P.C :- :- :- 1. In the light of the affidavit of Mr. Ketan Fatehchand Karani, the Managing Director of the respondent company tendered in court today, no orders can be passed on the petition which has been :2: :2: :2: registered pursuant to the opinion of the BIFR. The order of BIFR recommending winding up has been set aside and the matter is remanded back to BIFR as set out in para 5 of the Affidavit. In such circumstances, the matter is disposed off. Needless to state, that disposal of this petition would not preclude this court from taking such steps as are permissible in law in case BIFR forwards its opinion recommending winding up subsequently or upon any creditor approaching this court with the winding up petition. sd/- (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)