THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.10602 OF 2010 Dated 30th April, 2010 Between: Indla Saidulu …Petitioner And The Superintendent of Police, Nalgonda District and 2 others. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Mr.M.Subba Reddy for Ms.D.Madhavi Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Home The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.3 in registering Crime No.38 of 2009 only against one person though the petitioner has given names of other persons as being involved in commission of the offence in his complaint, dated 15-02-2009, as illegal and arbitrary. After hearing Ms.D.Madhavi, learned Counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the petitioner should have filed a private complaint under Section 190 Cr.P.C., instead of invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. In view of availability of the efficacious remedy referred to above, this Writ Petition is wholly misconceived and the same is accordingly dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail the said remedy. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP No.13586 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 30th April, 2010 lur