S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 266/2009 (Smt. Shamim Bano Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.) Date of order : 17.2.2009 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr. Mahaveer Bishnoi, for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner was appointed as a Central Reference Circular Facilator (CRCF) under the Scheme known as “Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan”. Some budget was allotted and apart from the budget allotted, the petitioner incurred some more amount from her own pocket, but that amount has not been paid by the respondent No.3 to the petitioner. In my view, it would be appropriate to permit the petitioner to make a detailed representation to the respondents No.2 and 3 within 15 days from today ventilating her grievances and if such a representation is made, the respondents shall consider and decide the same within one month therefrom according to law and after such decision, any of the grievance of the petitioner remains unredressed, the petitioner will be at liberty to file a fresh writ petition. With these directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp S.B.Civil Misc. Stay Petition No. 549/09 In S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 266/2009 (Smt. Shamim Bano Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.) Date of order : 17.2.2009 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr. Mahaveer Bishnoi, for the petitioner. Since the writ petition itself has been disposed of, the stay petition also stands disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp