HIGH eOURT OF CHHATTiSGARH: BILASPUR Petitioners 1) Banshila!Unhale,agedabout51years.sonof Shr Qsnds Ls! Unhsis. Drsssp.tlv workipo ss R.A.E.O Block Khadsawan, Distt. ..Korea (CG). 2) Atui Kumar Harne, aged about 48 years.son of Shri Kashlnath Rao, presently working as R.A.-E.O., BlGGk .Aiarharpur, Distt. Kanker (CG). • 3) Rajenara Prasad Joshi, agea about 47 years, son of Shri Sidhinath Joshi, presently working as, R.A.E.O. Block . Chhuli^ada, Dlstt. Rajnandgaon (CG). Resoondents 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through' Chief Seeretary, Dau Kaiyan Rslpur (CQ). • ' • Singh . Bhawan, 2) State of Madhya Pradesh,'through the Chief' ..Secretary, Govind Vallabh. • Bhawan, Qoyernment df Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal. 3) •The: : .Director • .(Agriculture), State of Chhattisgarh, Lophandi;Raipur (CG). 4) The Director (Agriculture) State of M;P. Vindyac.ha! Bhawan, Bhopal MP}: ' 5) UnionoflndiathToughiVtinistrvofPersonnel, Pubilc Grievances and Penslon Dspartment of Personne! and Training Khan Market, NewDelhi. (Writ Petition underArt'cte 226 oftheConstitutionofindia.) i,J. Shri V. Vijay, counsel fgr the petitioners, Shri M.P.S. Bhafia, C^'. Go'A Advocate fortheState. Shri Kasif Shakeei, ooijnsel for the resDondent No.5. (Passedon 8!dayofMay,20085 | . . With consent of learned counseiappearing for the parties, the matter is neard finaliy. ^ ' . , : . ' • • 2) Learned eounsei appearing for the peiitionere submits that the petitionersiao not want to pressthis petition on merit, exceptthatthe petitioners be.permitteci to maKe ^—-: • • <7: ,— ;?a|u -2.- a representation to the Committe'e in the light of the judgment and order dated 17 April, 2007 passed bythis Court in B.R, Godbole Vs. tvlunicipal Corporation, Durg and oihers {2007 (2) CGLJ 417}, to which learned counsel appearing-for the respondents have no objection. 3) Accordingly, the petition is disposed of in the same tenns i.e., the Committee so constituted is directed to consider.the representation made by the petitioners, if their representation is not considered eariier. In theevent, If it is-ftot considered earlier, the fresh representation may be considered.as eariy as possibie within a perioa' of four months from the date of receipt of t.he representation. This exeroise on the part of the Government of india may be completed within a period of fcur months from the date of receiptofacopyofthisorder. ^l Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri &• IS8 ga fUf s. iBll tolIluiSNBBs