IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL No.759 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 16.06.2008 in Writ Petition No.12316 of 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Abbineni Duragaiah, S/o Pochaiah, Kamalapur Village & Post, Bhupalpally Mandal, Warangal District. ....Appellant And 1. Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Warangal, represented by its Presiding Officer. 2. The Superintending Engineer, R & B Circle, Warangal, 3. The Executive Engineer, R & B Regular Division, Hanamkonda, Warangal District. ....Respondents Counsel for the appellant : Sri A.K.Jayaprakash Rao Counsel for respondent No.1 : None. Counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 : Government Pleader for Roads & Buildings. The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (per Anil R. Dave, C.J.) Being aggrieved by the order dated 16th June, 2008 passed in Writ Petition No.12316 of 2008, this appeal has been filed. The grievance which was made before the learned Single Judge was with regard to non-acceptance of a petition under Section 2-A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short, ‘the Act’) by the Registry of the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Warangal. The learned Advocate appearing for the appellant has submitted that the petition ought to have been accepted in view of the legal position enumerated in Section 36 of the Act. We do not ﬁnd any evidence to the eﬀect that a petition was submitted to the Registry of the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Warangal. We are sure that if the petition is re-presented before the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court at Wanrangal, the said petition shall be accepted by the Registry and if for any reason the petition is not to be entertained, reason for not entertaining the same would be recorded and then only the petition will be returned to the appellant. With the above observation, we do not entertain the appeal. The appeal is, therefore, rejected. ANIL R. DAVE, C.J. 31st July, 2008 R.SUBHASH REDDY, J. ….REGISTRAR To 1. The Mandal Revenue Oﬃcer, Araku Valley, Visakhapatnam District. 2. The Joint Collector, Visakhapatnam. 3. The District Collector, Visakhapatnam. 4. The Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 5. Two copies to the Govt. Pleader for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 6. Two C.D. copies. ARS