Crl.M.No.30331-M of 2009 #1# IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M.No.30331-M of 2009 Date of Order: 8.12.2010 Prem Pradeep and others .....Petitioners Vs. State of Haryana and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present: Mr. R.S. Cheema, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rohit Khanna, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. M.S. Sindhu, Addl.A.G, Haryana for respondent No.1. Mr. S.P.S. Sidhu, Advocate for respondent No.2. JASWANT SINGH, J (ORAL) Prayer under Section 482 Cr.P.C is for quashing of FIR No.144 dated 17.9.2009 under Sections 149/342/352/365/ 386/392/420/426 / 468/474/506 (2)/120-B/34 IPC, P.S Sector 17/18, Gurgaon as well as order dated 10.9.2009 (P.2) passed on a complaint filed by respondent No.2 under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. On the last date of hearing i.e 6.9.2010, learned state counsel, on instructions from Sub Inspector Ved Parkash, had stated that the matter is still under investigation and certain offences have already been deleted. Under the circumstances, the Commissioner of Police, Gurgaon was directed to file a status report by way of affidavit with regard to completion of investigation. In compliance of the same, status report by way of affidavit Crl.M.No.30331-M of 2009 #2# dated 4.12.2010 of Sh. Surjeet Singh Deswal, Commissioner of Police, Gurgaon has been filed in court today, which is taken on record. Status report reveals that the aforesaid FIR was registered on the complaint of respondent No.2-Rajiv Singh Rana and thereafter the investigation was transferred to Economic Offences Wing, Gurgaon. It is further revealed that from the investigation carried out by the investigating officers, alleged facts in complaint have not been substantiated and there is no evidence to take further action and the Investigating Officer is filing cancellation report in the competent court. In view of the aforesaid developments and on instructions from Inspector Sajjan Kumar, learned state counsel submits that the present petition has become infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioners in the circumstances agrees that the grievance of the petitioner no longer survives. Disposed of as infructuous. However, in case any adverse order is passed by the learned Magistrate, the petitioners shall be at liberty to seek their remedy and raise all the pleas available to them, as per law. December 08, 2010 ( JASWANT SINGH ) manoj JUDGE