THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CRIMINAL PETITION NO.11047 OF 2010 ORDER: This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash further proceedings against petitioner-A7 in Crl.M.P.No.13 of 2009 in S.C.No.3 of 2009 on the file of Assistant Sessions Judge, Jangaon. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor-2nd respondent-State. Perused the record. 3.Petitioner-A7 along with other others is accused of the offences under Sections 148, 341, 307, 120-B read with 149 of IPC. After due investigation, on the complaint given by the first respondent, the police filed a charge sheet against the petitioner and six others for the above offences. The petitioner-A7 filed an application under Section 227 Cr.P.C seeking to discharge him from the case. The learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Jangaon by order dated 24.3.2009 dismissed the said application in Crl.M.P.No.13 of 2009 in S.C.No.3 of 2009. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner-A7 filed a revision in Crl.R.P.No.15 of 2009 before the Sessions Court. The learned Special Sessions Judge for SC/ST Cases-cum-VII Additional District Judge, Warangal by order dated 12-10-2010 dismissed the said revision petition. Hence, the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. 4. As seen from the complaint and also the contents of the charge sheet, specific allegations have been made against petitioner-A7 to the effect that he was the person who masterminded the attack on the complainant. 5.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no evidence on record to show that the petitioner-A7 was in any way involved in the commission of offence except the alleged confessional statements of the other accused. 6.As rightly observed by the learned Sessions Judge, the admissibility or otherwise of the confessional statements given by the other accused, involving the petitioner-A7, cannot be gone into at this stage and it is a matter of appreciation of evidence that may be adduced during the course of trial. The role of the peititoner-A7 and the part played by him in conspiring the alleged offence and carrying out the same, is a matter to be considered only on the basis of evidence that may be let in by the prosecution. 7.The inherent powers of the Court have to be exercised with care, caution and circumspection and cannot be invoked for the purpose of scuttling further proceedings of prosecution at the threshold, especially when specific allegations have been made against the accused and they are required to be considered only on the basis of the evidence that may be adduced during the course of trial. There are no valid or justifiable grounds to invoke the inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and quash further proceedings against the petitioner-A7. There are no merits in this petition. In the result, the criminal petition is dismissed. ______________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY,J rkk Dated: 8-11-2010