.„a.^S^^ ^^^^ ft te'led.-;k-"' y.R ^ ^•1 ^,} IN THE COtJRT OF AT CBBATT1SGASK WRITPETITI . -2s.2s?W280< SingfaS/o Firtu Agsdabout53 years, Poiice Station- Dabhra, Distriet- WOlfeiQi 'DKiufsr OBerato*'' Open listt, K.orsa- Chb.attisgarb, South Coai Fieids Ltd., TIim.""jl a'tc r'MTi X^aiVUg^i ii3 ^.>li~lX->', Bilaspur, MaspHr, .^^ v^ ^ Vf>' - 3. Generai Distt. ChhattisaaA. CliiefPeisomei Maiiager, SECL Ciririwiri CoUier^', (< ri Disfrict Korea.^. 'enCastProject), 4. ^ ^£ss~a-afTdy ;a -LV-iaiiSg.ei^ SECL Cbirimiri Coyiery. (Opea Cs pf^^t^f^ fSSSt .:VL 1Vjts''^'t,^ euinmiri Superinteudent ofMinesA'faiiager; CbsmsiiOpen-Cast Project, Gfairimiri Colliery, Distt. Kc REi ENTS |)|l»tjNtlitT- sssssassc^zss^Ksn V i 'fn: ^ "4^' w 13sw ll"j i>KIIN §1§ li"BIS3 l&'i"l!S?l ll^l 1111 |,S l^ 1("*)l§li l^lsl3 SI»IS °1SIW WIIS81M llwll? I^IP|S§^, ISI?11»5ii "•'ii"u»r'CI l^ .\/_1. U/^ "70 XI-HC-78 vST.-d ^i^firt^, yrflf-i'id, Rp'il-i-iy^ ITPTc5T®m<^ lw.-l.^.;.z^^/v1^, ST^CTEpTf^lttf; ?raiT3)T^?TiPWP ^•^ 31T^9T q^Ef? (iqfg^g) ?RIl<R?lfeiaff^?T Mr- Pankaj Shrivgstava| Mr. P.S. Koshy, tearnecj Thls vi/rlt petition is ConstEtution of !ndia impugninlg P-1) whereby the petitioner w4: he retires on 30.06.2005 on si The undisputed facts p^r pstitioner submits that as certificate, 1965 (Annexure P recorded is 06.10.1952, but ir( recorded as 01.07.1945. The regard to his date of birth (f; deciston has been taken on| notice of retirement on 30.06.1 Annexure P-9 "implementatijsn determination / ciarification ofl date of birth given jn the Sc^ool correct, provided the same v^i date of empioyment. During the course of a| ^- - petitioner suggested that the ths petitioner be referred So ( ERrafcRfftWlTHt'ir'fs'^t^TR'R ^?3l1^T3f)^CT counse! for the p for rsspondents. 'iled under Articie 226/227 of the order dated 19.01.2005 (Annexure s directed to clear ai! his dues before i|perannuation. |re that the petitioner was appointed 112.1973. Learned counsel for the his mark sheet of primary schooi 1-2), the date of birth of the pstitioner the service book his daie of birth is Ipetitioner has raised the dispute with [>n 31.03.1989 (Annexure P-5). No his dispute before he received the .g005. Learned counse! has reiiea' on Instruction No.76 procedure for age of employees* to show that the Leaving Ceriificate be treated as fas issued by the schoot prior to the rguments, the learned counse! for the case for determination of the age of he Age Determination Committee as XI-HC-78 ^SET "yi<4irt«,y-alt-i•'KS, Rlril<(4y'( TFTc?T S?m^ 3'I^iTiprf^TT?? aa?TaTT*9Tg5tlH? 8BS >,3rm< 3TT^3T iraq? (l^cli^e)^) Wf' S^'55/C'J W^ 200 s^iTW^rftnan^sT -2-- provided in Ciause 'C' of |rr| determlnation of aae. Lsarned counsel forl objection in vievi' of the fact 1|1 vs. M/s. Souih Eastern Coail identical facts were involved Determination Committee bV thisGburt. !n view of the above, the dispute along wlth aj Determinatlon CommiStee arjd wiil consider all She documeiht as the respondents and give In case the petitioner instatement and continuationl age as may be determined with bacR wages. <ni<<[u<i1l llinT ^'fetfl >!Rl<•<;!•< ^aTl^Tsn^sT piementatlon of Instruction No.76 for ie respondsnts has no serious hat in VV.P.No.2564 of 2003 (Bhoreiai IRei(is Limited & Another) wherein the iand the case was referred to the Age order dated 05.12.2003 passed |the respondents are directed to refer relevant documents to the Age |d Shs Age Determination Committee ts furnished by the petitioner as weil 'its decision within a period of 30 days. the petitioner wi!t be entiited to re- o.f his services in accordance with the Iby the Age Determination Committee view of the foregcjiing, fhe petition stands disposed of Sd/- Satish K. Agnlhotri Judge