IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16088 of 2011 SATENDRA CHAUHAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 23.06.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner being husband is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 323, 324, 379 and 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 /4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner is ready to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour. It appears that the reconciliation failed due to non appearance of the petitioner before the learned court below. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that it was the fault of the learned counsel for the petitioner before the learned court below as the petitioner to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour. In the aforesaid circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the 2 learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on bail on provisional bail for six months, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Complaint Case No. 222 of 2010, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Let the learned court below issue notice to the complainant and fix a date for her appearance. On appearance of the complainant, the petitioner will take complainant to her matrimonial house and keep her as wife with full dignity and honour. The provisional anticipatory bail of the petitioner will be confirmed by the learned court below on substantial restoration of the matrimonial harmony within a period of six weeks, or if the complainant deliberately refuses to reside with the petitioner. Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) 3