IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 7TH AUGUST 2008 / 16TH SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 23784 of 2008(F) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: ------------ 1. N.LATHEEFA, LATHEEFA TILES DEPOT., MARKET JN., NEDUMANGAD. 2. R.CHANDRAN NAIR, AMANGANASSERI VEEDU ONAMOODU, ANACODU, VEERANAKAVU PO., NEDUMANGAD. 3. M.N.PRASAD, KARTHIKA BHAVAN, NANDU PO., NEDUMANGAD. 4. S.SHAJI, SHAJI BHAVAN, PARAMBUPARA, PERAYAM PO., PACHAPALODE. BY ADV. SRI.N.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR SRI.V.K.SHAMUSUDHEEN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER, NEDUMANGAD. 2. DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER, TRIVANDRUM BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. I.V. PRAMOD. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 23784 of 2008 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 7th August, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioners 2 to 4, who are workers claiming to be working for the 1st petitioner-employer, submitted applications for registration under Rule 26A of the Kerala Headload Workers Rules. The 1st respondent dismissed the applications by Ext. P4 order. Against the same, the petitioners filed Ext. P5 appeal before the 2nd respondent under Rule 25C of the Kerala Headload Workers Rules. The petitioners seek a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P5 appeal expeditiously. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P5 appeal as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioners shall forward a certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition to the 2nd respondent for compliance. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.