BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Eighteenth day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.10084 of 2011 1. BALAN 2. LATHA 3. ARUNKUMAR 4. SEKAR 5. MUNIYAMMAL ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 3 & 5 & 6 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALLI NAGARAM POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.245/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S. VELLAICHAMY Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 3 and 5 and 6 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147,294(b),324 and 506(i) of I.P.C. in Crime No.245 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned Counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners arrayed as A1 to A3 and A5 and A6 and a case was registered under Sections 147,294(b),324 and 506(i) of I.P.C. in Crime No.245 of 2011. He further submitted that already A4 arrested and enlarged on bail and the injured has already been discharged from the hospital and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that a case has been registered on 31.07.2011 and the injured has already been discharged from the hospital and hence he prays for dismissal of this application. 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case that the alleged occurrence took place on 31.07.2011 at 05.45 p.m and a case was registered on the same day against the unnamed persons and as per the documents filed it wou1d shows that the fourth accused arrested and enlarged on bail and the injured persons has already been discharged from https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the hospital and even though the petitioners were not arrested they neither interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Theni, and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Theni, and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. sd/- 18/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALLI NAGARAM POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1CC TO M/S.S.VELLAICHAMY, ADVOCATE SR.28388 SR : 23.08.2011 : 2p/6c ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10084 of 2011 Date :18/08/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/