IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA First Appeal No.163 of 1990 Daropadi Devi Versus Shri Kishore Sinha ---------------------------------- 11. 03.11.2011. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant on the interlocutory application No.3325 of 2000. This is a substitution application filed on behalf of the appellant for substitution of the legal representatives of the deceased respondent No.1. The application is within time. It is stated that out of the legal representatives as mentioned in detail in paragraph 1 of the substitution application the widow, Dropadi Devi, is already on record as appellant (now she is also dead). The rest of the legal representatives are required to be substituted. Accordingly, the interlocutory application No.3325 of 2000 is allowed and the legal representatives as mentioned in detail in paragraph 1 of this interlocutory application are substituted in place of the deceased respondent No.1 after deleting his name. As stated above since the widow who was original appellant also died and, therefore, another application, i.e., I.A. No.7413 of 2011 has been filed on behalf of the legal representatives of the deceased appellant as mentioned in detail in paragraph 4 who were substituted earlier for being transposed as - 2 - appellant in this appeal. Accordingly, this interlocutory application is allowed and they are transposed as appellant in this appeal. The learned counsel, Mr. Yogendra Mishra, submitted that he will file an application for restoration application within two weeks. Prayer is allowed. Sanjeev/- (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)