IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14353 of 2002 DHARAM VIR SINGH & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 9. 21.7.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioners are aggrieved by the declaration issued under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894(hereinafter referred to as “the Act) dated 3.8.2002 as contained in Annexure-1 to this application. It is submitted on their behalf that declaration dated 3.8.2002 should be quashed and the authorities should be directed to consider his objection dated 30.9.2002 as contained in Annexure-2 to this application. 3. I regret not to accept such submission in view of the counter affidavit that the acquisition is under emergency provisions as the appropriate Government issued notification dated 23.7.2002 which was published in the District Gazette on 1.8.2002, whereunder filing and hearing of the objection under Section 5A of the Act was dispensed with. 4. In view of the earlier notification dispensing with the filing and hearing of objection under Section 5A of the Act, the submission raised on behalf of the petitioners that declaration dated 3.8.2002, Annexure-1 should be quashed with direction to the authorities to consider the objection dated 30.9.2002 is absolutely misconceived and this writ application is, accordingly dismissed. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha,J.)