IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 8886 of 2008 Between: Hanumanthu Yerukla S/o. Yellappa Rajivgandhi Coliny, Rayadurg, Ananthapur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 M/s. Hindusthan Petroleum Co.Ltd., Rep. by its Regional Manager, Ananthapur LPG Regional Office, R.R.Mansion, 1-4-609, 2nd Floor, HLC Colony, Anantapur. 2 M/s. Hindusthan Petroleum Co.Ltd., Rep. by its Senior Regional Manager, Vijayawada LPG Regional Office, IDA Kondapally, Krishna District. 3 Deputy Central Manager, HPCL, Thallamuthunataeajan Building, 4th Floor, 8, Gandhi Irwin Road, Post Box No. 3045, Egmore, Chenai. 4 Balakoti Naik Nalavath R/o. Ganriggganumala Village, Bollapalli Mandal, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: MR. T.SRINIVAS MR.P.V.SANJAY KUMAR The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus to declare the inaction on the part of respondent Nos.1 to 3 in commencing enquiry on complaint, dated 15.03.2008 filed by the petitioner as per Clause 12 of notification, dated 01.10.2007 as arbitrary and illegal. The petitioner sought for a consequential direction to respondent Nos.1 to 3 to complete the enquiry on the said complaint. At the hearing, Sri T.Srinivas, learned counsel representing respondent Nos.1 to 3 submitted, on instructions, that the respondent Corporation is proposing to address the petitioner to furnish necessary details with regard to the allegations made by him in selection of dealer in respect of LPG Dealership in question and that till passing of appropriate orders on the complaint of the petitioner, the Letter Of Appointment (LOA) will not be issued in favour of respondent No.4. In view of this submission of the learned counsel, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.11789 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 25th APRIL, 2008 kvni