IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1727 of 2008 MANAS SHAW Versus KAILASH YADAV & ORS ----------- 2 24.10.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court, the amendment allowed in the written statement is only by way of certain clarifications which became necessary in view of the report of the Pleader Commissioner. This Court would find from paragraph no.6 and also other paragraphs of the written statement that such plea in fact with regard to the plot nos. 3901 & 3902 had already taken by the defendant opposite parties and accordingly, whatever has been brought by way of amendment in the written statement is only by way of clarification/explanation. Such routine and formal nature of amendment in the written statement for the reasons recorded in the impugned order has been correctly allowed by the Court below. That being so, this Court would not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order inasmuch as the same does not suffer from any jurisdictional error. Accordingly, this civil revision application, being devoid of any merit, is hereby dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)