•I 1 f(^t UlUUCOiJKl'UFC PETJTIONER RESPONDENT WRIT PETITION No. 3920 of2003 Gopal Ram Chandrakar S/o Late Jiwaxhan Lal Chandi'akar, aged about 59 years, R/o VilSage Atan.g, Tah. Kurud, Distt. Dhanitari (C.G.'i VERSUS : 1. Babu Rao Bhansde. s/o Lats Shankar Lal Bhangde, R/o GokuSpuc.Ward, Dhaintari Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) 2. Smt. Aausuiya Wd/'o Late Govind Piinplapure R,/o In fi-ont of Paiace of Gopai Pimplapure, Kiiafsiya Raod, Rajapara Sakti, Distt. Jaiijgir- Champa I'C.G.') 3. State of Chliattisgarii, Tlii'ough Coilector, Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari ('C.G.) WRTT PETITION U/A 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Boa'ble Shri K. Agmliotri. 'resent: Slii-i Awadh Trioathi, Advocate for the petitioasr. liri Rajeadra Agravi'al, Panel Lawyerforthe State. (Passed on 14l° day of October, 2008) Leamed counsei appearing fbr ttie petitioner, on instructioiis, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest tlus matter on merits at this s'tage. However, leamed counsel subiiuts fhat sincs the matter has been pending consideration in the court below for ths !ast more than six years, this C'ourt mav direct the court belovv to consider and decide the case expeditioiisly, to which leamed coimsel appearing for the respondent No. 3 has no objection. Ha\'ing regard to flie facts situation of the case. it is exoediem in the interest ofjustice to direct Ihe court below where the Civil Suit being No. 55-A/2002 ('Baburam Bhandge & one v. Gopal Ram Chandrakar & One) is pending consideration, to consider and decide fhe suit as expeditiously as possible. It is orderec accordiagiy. la view of fhe fbregoine. the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. __ ^- - —- —— Sd/- Satish K. Agirihotri Judge