\wY IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH A BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETIT10N(S)N0.$H4(/201o. $3§§§£E 5EN$H Z x PETITIONER: Gajendra Singh Mali, son of Amar Singh Mali, aged about 56 years, working as Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Aatargaqn, Block Churiya, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. verSus Respondents 1. f State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Dismét Education omcer, Raga-h, A (mini? 07)] , Secretary School Education Department, D.K.S.Bhaw‘an, Rajpur, Chhattisgarh. \ P District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 3. Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA RAL ORDE (Passed on 2"“ July, 2010) k The petitioner was appomted on O9¥07-1 9 asm Trainin Institute o 7’ m B g n probation 10f Rs 100l- and after that Rs 150l- m the second ear after c1earanc o te rstlannua! examination After completion of his probatlom he was rante reguiar pay seale Learned counsel appeanng for the petlttoner submits that the Issu Involved In the case ts as to whether the petitioner ls entitled to regutar pay scate Wh ff i it eect from the date of lmttal appomtment or after completion of probation e Invotved herem was consrdered by the Madhya Pradesh State dhistr‘a't‘ive Tribune! Jabalpur m O A No 2745/89 (Madhukanf Yadu and 56 thers v [State ofM P & others) wherem It was held that the srmrtarty srtuated teacher entrtled to regular pay scale With effect from the date of mrtral s ' ppointm The matter was taken up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court The peat was dtsmlssed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court uphotdmg\the decrsron o O R y e ; f h f gd er -! - ‘ _ u ‘Ami 3: O ‘ V a t I i v ap i f 1 eular pay scale from the date of Inmal appomt ’ en rg t i lLeamed counse! appearing for the pe moner further submits that thus Court ’whrte consrdenng the same Issue In Ram umar ahu . oters v tat ovt af Chhattrsgarh & Another W P (S) No 81 o 07 b order ated t 2/022007 has granted regular pay scale wrth eect rom the date ef rnrtral 1 ff f l apporqtment 5 t s . Learned counsel appeanng for the partres joinly submrt that the case I squarely covered by the decrsron of thrs Court In the case of Ram Kumar Sahu l l l ‘ (sapra). : In mew of that thrs etition Is allowed on the same terms subject to p l errfcatron of the acs No orer as to cost v ft d s na Moa te ge K S 3 h $e G 3 f 20 y d Mamdr hn shrlvasdv JFJd