IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13414 of 2009 SMT.RADHA RAJ Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 15.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated 30.7.2009 of the District Programme Officer discharging the petitioner from the post of Anganbari Sevika and in pursuance of which final orders have been issued on 3.8.2009 at Anenxure-5. While the petitioner contends specifically in Paragraph 10 of the writ application that the orders of termination are in violation of the principles of natural justice in as much as she was not heard, in absence of the original order of termination on record, this Court finds it difficult to arrive at any conclusion in respect of the same. The rules regulating appointment of Anganbari Sevika as framed in 2006 in its amended form dated 25.7.2008 vests power in the District Programme officer to hear and decide the issue of termination against which lies before the District Magistrate. This application is therefore disposed with an order of remand to the District Programme Officer, Rohtas who shall examine on facts if the petitioner was issued any show cause notice before termination. If he is satisfied that a show 2 cause notice was issued to which the petitioner replied to or not, he shall pass appropriate orders accordingly. If he is satisfied that no show cause notice was issued to the petitioner, he shall be required to issue a show cause notice, hear the petitioner and then decide the matter. In either event as the case may be, let the District Programme Officer pass fresh appropriate speaking orders in accordance with law within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed off. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)