IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 15305 of 2008 Between: C. Veeranaganna, S/o. Chinnappa, R & B Division, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Y.R. Subramanayam, S/o. Y.C. Ramaswamy, R & B Quarters, Near Rajannapark, Sarojinidevi Road, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 2 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, T, R & B Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3 The Engineer-in-Chief (Admn.), T, R & B Department, Errumanzil, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in thenature of Writ of Mandamus, to call for the records connected withthe directions of the Hon'ble A.P. Administrative Tribunal dt. 30-6-2008 in O.A.No. 4695/2008 and set aside the same, and issue any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circusmstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.BALA KRISHNA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR ROADS & BUILDINGS The Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU Writ Petition No.15305 of 2008 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) This writ petition is filed seeking to set aside the order dated 30-6-2008 passed in O.A.No.4695 of 2008 on the file of Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad. 2. The first respondent, who is the applicant in the above O.A., challenged the order of his transfer from R & B Division, Tirupathi, and posting of the writ petitioner in his place. The Tribunal had admitted O.A. and granted interim suspension of the transfer order, pending further orders, which is challenged in this writ petition. The Tribunal has not rendered any final decision or conclusion in the matter. When the Tribunal is seized of the matter and the interim order is passed pending disposal of O.A., we are not inclined to interfere with such discretionary order in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. It is always open to the writ petitioner to file a petition in the Tribunal seeking to vacate the interim order. In case the vacate petition is filed, the Tribunal is directed to dispose of the same within a period of two weeks from the date the writ petitioner chooses to file the vacate petition. 3. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of at the stage of admission. __________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J. 17-07-2008 ___________________ C.V.RAMULU, J. bsc