IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI TUESDAY, THE 23RD SEPTEMBER 2008 / 1ST ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 28256 of 2008(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SREEKALA P.P., PAROPARAMMAL PARANNUR P.O., NARIKUNNI, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.JOHN BRITTO SRI.C.A.RAJEEV RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THE CONTROLLER OR EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT. BY SC SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).28256/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of September, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner, who was a B.Tech student in the KMCT College of Engineering, Mukkom, in 'Information Technology' had written the 7th Semester Examination held in December, 2007. Apparently, dissatisfied by the marks obtained in one paper, she had applied for revaluation of her answer sheet for the failed subject before the second respondent. Petitioner is aggrieved that the result of the revaluation has not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of the 7th Semester B.Tech Examination held in December, 2007. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to publish the results of the revaluation of the answer sheet in relation to the 7th W.P.(C).28256/2008 2 Semester B.Tech Examination held in December, 2007, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment provided the application for revaluation is in order and otherwise correct. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs