... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.658 OF 1989 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.658 OF 1989 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.658 OF 1989 ...................................................... Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Orders Registrar’s orders ...................................................... Shri R.D.Suryawanshi i/by Shri G.B. Chavan for the Appellant. Shri S.R.Shinde, A.P.P. for the Respondent. CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. ABHAY S. OKA, J. ABHAY S. OKA, J. DATE : AUGUST 18, 2006. DATE : AUGUST 18, 2006. DATE : AUGUST 18, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . For the reasons separately recorded in the judgment, following is the operative part of the order: : O R D E R : (i) The impugned Judgment and Order dated 19th August, 1989 in Sessions Case No.189 of 1988 is quashed and set aside. (ii) The conviction and sentence of the Appellant under section 20(b)(ii) and 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and ... 2 ... Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 is set aside and the Appellant-accused is acquitted of the said offences. (iii) If any fine is recovered from the Appellant, the same shall be refunded to him. (iv) The bail bonds of the Appellant stand cancelled. (v) The direction given by the Trial Court regarding muddemal is confirmed. (vi) Appeal is accordingly allowed in above terms. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE