IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN MONDAY, THE 11TH OCTOBER 2010 / 19TH ASWINA 1932 RPFC.No. 430 of 2007 () ---------------------- ( MC.248/2006 of FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM) .................... PETITIONER/ RESPONDENT: ---------------------------------------- ABDUL HAMEED, AGED 28 YEARS, S/O.ABDUL KHADAR, CHALUNGAL HOUSE, NAD, P.O,.VIDAKUZHA KARA, THRIKKAKARA NORTH VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK. BY ADVS. SRI.BABU KARUKAPADATH SRI.JAGAN ABRAHAM M.GEORGE RESPONDENTS / PETITIONERS 1 AND 2: ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. HAMNAS, AGED 25 YEARS, D/O.ABDUL AZEEZ, ALANGAPARAMBIL HOUSE, NOCHIRA KARA, ALUVA EAST VILLAGE, ALUVA TALUK. 2. ISHA HANA, AGED 1 1/2 YEARS, D/O.HAMNAZ, MINOR, ALANGAPARAMBIL HOUSE, NOCHIRA KARA, ALUVA EAST VILLAGE, ALUVA TALUK, REPRESENTED BY MOTHER HAMNAZ. THIS REV.PETITION (FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: VK V.K.MOHANAN, J. ------------------------------- R.P.(F.C.)No.430 of 2007 ------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of October, 2010. O R D E R The counsel for the revision petitioner filed a memo dated 5.10.2010, in which it is stated that the claim of the 1st respondent herein has been settled between the revision petitioner and the respondent, as per an agreement dated 20.4.2009 and all the amounts due to the 1st respondent has also been paid to the 1st respondent by the petitioner and also stated that the petitioner continues to pay the amount to their child viz., Isha Hana, the 2nd respondent as per the order in M.C.248/06 dated 5.5.2007 of the Family Court, Ernakulam and thus finally it is also requested that the revision petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the above R.P.(F.C.) as settled. Recording the above memo, this revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. V.K.MOHANAN, Judge. ami/