1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CA NO. 11682/2008 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 997 OF 2006. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court s or Judge s orders. ’ ’ or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 10 th June, 2009. ... . Heard learned Counsel. The advocate for the respondent no.2 has intimated the office that the Respondent No.2 Salimul Hasan Khan alias Salimoddin Khan s/o Mumtazoddin Khan has expired on 7 th April, 2008, however there was no such communication to the Counsel for the appellant. This has added to the delay in the matter. The Counsel was required to collect names of the legal representatives of deceased Respondent no.2, which are disclosed in paragraph 4 of the application. The delay in causing to file the application is not deliberate, it is condoned. Abatement set aside. The legal representatives of respondent no.2 as mentioned in the application is 2 permitted to be brought on record within fourteen days. The application allowed as above. ( K.U.CHANDIWAL ) JUDGE **** bdv/office/ca5367.09