x^ HIGttCOURTOF^HHftTTIS©»RttATBtLASPU DIV1SSQMBENCH HON'SLESMRI^RNEEVGyPTA.ej. HC>N®LESHRI^UNILKUMARSiNHA,J.^ Writ Petitibn (PiU No. 5705of 2010 1. Pavvan Kymar Devrar^an ^ ^ of NaRu] Lal Dewangan, aged about 37 years:,,1.^:.'.. .:::,:•:•,'•••.••••,:^ 2. AasHish Jaisvral son of Anand Jaisvyal,agedabout27years, .•^3;.'::: Panna.;;^,.Lall:;;.'Dewan^n.'-.sQn:';..^^ Ramclylari Dewangan, agecl about 33years, Aii are?,R/o. Village Katangi, R.S. Tah9il?«asdol, District Raipur(C:G.) 4. Hemlat 'VeFma son of Pireet Ram 'Verma^agedSO.yeare, 5, Girjsh Kumar Verma son of , BisahramVerma, aged35 years, ^6. VisBny Prasad Verma, s^ Sbyan'i|alVernia,agect28yeare;.; ;NQ,^Y4 ^tQ, ;6. are. ;.R/o;^^^. ~ CRheGBftak^P.S. and Tahsil Kasdoli 1,.,,..\:\' Distrid:.Raipur:;(e.Q.),:^,..^''^ ;VI^US:...','::!';. ::•;•'• i'1.',;.:^tat^iQ Uft%iiSgar||^hrQugBygl3.i,V ;:'Secr^Fy,;:ElatS(5tiaiyafraind;Rura|^^:;?;.:; D^^lopjrierft;:'Departnient,.'D.K;S.!\^i? •,l:BhsiM/ao,',R3ipyr-(C.(3,^ ;/::::•; :;;-';. 2. CQljeetor, Raipur.^DistnetRaipyr' ^.^@(NW|||E5^!^|le;Qfjeei|,';..|aRpacl;; ; ^I^^CTI *IWi^11)^M£8isffiietJRSJ!S9ti ^aia •N fli^l^l ^fe-^'il it^tresR'l)^''' KIKilii.la l:!::llc 4. Additional Gollector, Balouda Bazar, DistrietRaipur (C.G.) 5. Sub Dh/isional Officer (Revenue), Bifeigarh, DistrictRaipur(C;G.) 6; Tahsildar, Tahsil Kasdol (Enquiry Qfficer), DistrictRaipur(C.G.) 7, -Block Eduoation OfRcer, Kasdol, DistrfctRaipur(C.G.) WritPetJtiQnunderArtiele228oTtheConstJitutionoflndja Present: Smt. Meena Shastri, leamed counsel for the petitioners...: ;•1:;•:\"- ".': :• • ;. .:: T;':: . ; '. , Shri Kisnore Bhaduri, learned Adyitional Advoeate General forthe State/ respondents. (04th pCtober, 2010) , The fotlowing order of the Court was passed by '•:... Learned counsel forthe parties are heard. 2) The petitioners have filed this writ petition styled as 'Public Interest Litigatipn' forthe following reliefs: "10.1 That, this hfon'ble Court be pleasedtacatl forthe l entire record pertaining to the instant enquiry for it's kind perusal. 10.2 That, the t-lon'ble Court may further be pleased to issue appropriate writ/ direction commanding the respondenfs to enquire/ investigate the entire matter properly by constituting a high power committee or Lokayukt or C.B.I, or any other independent enquiry agency to meet theends oifjustice. 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court further be pleased to direct the respondent No.1 to prosecute the liable S :'aB-!5S! ^xy authority and to reeover the amount taken by them.wifh bankrate interest; 10.4 Any other retief(s), which may deems fit, tooking to the facts & circumstances of the case may be given to thepetitioner." 3) The petitioners,thus,in substanee areseekinga direetion for enquiry/ investigation in the entire matter relating to the appointmentsof Shiksha Karmi Grade-ltl bythe Janpad Panchayat Kasdol, district Raipur. 4) For ascertaining the cprrectness ofthe allegations made by the petitioners in thewrit petition, a fact finding ienquiry wouldl be necessary. 5) In our opinjon, such a fact finding enquirycan better be conducted by the 'LokAayog'. 6) The petitioners, if advised, may approach 'Lok Aayog' forthe redressal oftheirgrievancesprQjected in the writ petition. 7) With the above observation, the writ petjtion stands disposed of Sd/- Chief Justice subbu Sd/- SunilKitmarSinha Judge Bl SX9