.7“. 1N THE HIQH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (i’y P wow w” ~ ME mum 1 O M.v. ACT’FOR ENHANCEMENT APPEAL U/s. 73 E [APPELLANT , ismvbha'jan, S/o. 1aikaran, Caste- i CLAIMANT Kewat, Aged about 18 years, 1‘ Occupation Cuitivator, R/o. ViHage Ramnag‘r, P.S. \]ainagar, Tahsil Suraipur, District Surguia (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS IL/ Bhanupratap Singh @ Pandul, S/o. “NON-APPLICANTS laimangal Singh, Caste — Gond, Aged \q about 30 years, Occupatiou-Driver, E :b' R/o.Village Kuruwan, P.S. ]ainagar, Q‘N Tahsil Surajpur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) (DRIVER) /2. Arjun, S/o. Dilaram, Caste-Gond, ‘ R/0.Village Kuruwan, P.S. Tainagar, y\ Tahsil Surajpur, Distt. Surguja' (C.G‘.) y (OWNER) " Tg / United India lnsurance Company ’ r/ Limited, Through-%ranch Manager, ‘v Branch Office ~ Near Ram Mandir, Ambikapur, District Surguia (C.G.). i I‘ ; ‘ (iNsURER) ¢ A...%é.,z..€z E200 'mmaéqim M a§awmuwa1aw%awaf%an § siiéummj amatuémmiaw‘ i EamRmaaa$a HI - A J. & Hon. shri D.KDeshmukj1,g L DB: Hon. Shri Fakhruddin, Agg. h7l1olzoos When the case was called, appellant and the case was passe er subsequent matters was going on, abruptly Shn Ashok Shukla Ad‘vocate appeared and ms1sted that h1s case be taken up This is nqt fair. Counsel to b6 careful in future. WM Sd/‘ Fakhruddin Judge Later on~ i \ x Shn A.K. Shukla, learned cou ‘ Leérned counsel for the appel According!y,gaf a‘ppeal is dismissed as withdrawn. ’ Sdl- Fakhruddjn I r Jdge 7" ~\\_ Wh1le haarmg on the oth i over. fl—t'w Sd/m DILIP RADSAHEB DESHMUKH Judge _»v i J, i i i M Sol 2A. SP/FS/2005-20,000 . V WWW) feel ant wants for the to apEeiiant. withdraw i this appeal. ameehmmeeeeneEm $Wm§€r none was present. on behalf of the i Dlllp Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge W q