IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 13 OF 2003 SHRI MAHESH VINAYAK PAI, ....Appellant MUMBAI-16. Versus SMT.RUPA MAHESH PAI, ....Respondent PORVORIM,BARDEZ-GOA. Shri M.S. Joshi, Advocate for the Appellant. Shri J.P. Mulgaonkar, Advocate for the Respondent. Coram:- P.V. KAKADE, J. Date:- 24th November, 2006 P.C.: Heard both sides. It is informed that this is an appeal against the interim order for maintenance, passed by the the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Mapusa dated 23/12/2002. However, the maintenance application is finally adjudicated by the trial Court and, therefore, this particular appeal is rendered infructuous. Hence, stands dismissed as rendered infructuous with no order as to costs. P.V. KAKADE, J. NH