1 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.686 OF 2009 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.481 OF 2008 Sou Rajashree Kamble & anr .. Applicants -versus Smt. Indirabai Potdar and ors .. Respondents Pankaj J. Das for the applicants Shri.Sachin Dhakephalkar for respondent Nos l & 2 None for the respondent Nos 3 to 7 CORAM: MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J DATED: 13t0 January, 2010 P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned Counsel appearing for the applicants submits that the respondent No.l is died on lst November, 2008. She has one son and one daughter. Her son Sunil is already on record as respondent No.2. However, the son and the daughter are to be taken on record as legal representatives of the Respondent No.l. 3. Learned Counsel further submits that the applicants became aware of the fact of death of Respondent No.l in December, 2008. He submits that he want to add the prayer for 2 condonation of delay. The amendment to add the prayer is allowed. The amendment to be carried out forthwith. The delay is condoned. 4. The application for bringing the legal heirs is allowed. The amendment to be carried out within four weeks and the applicant to supply the amended copy of plaint accordingly. 5. Civil Application is accordingly disposed of. (MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR,J)