.--•1- -,-'^ifrA'^ ^.•^yf^"T..€.-^--~' IN THE COURT OF HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION N0 .^.6(2...../2006 PETITIONER Kartik Ram Yadav, S/o Late Shri Gandhi Ram Yadav, Aged about 56 years working as Gangman Department of P.W.D.R/o Phulljhariya Para, Tah. Sarangarh Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) B91 •^ ^ RESPONDENTS /^^^l64 &c^c. .^" ^^." VERSUS / 1. State of Chhattisgarh through its Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) ^2. Engineer-in-Chief, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) ^ 3. Superintending Engineer, PublicWorks Department, BilaspurDivision, Distt.Bilaspur(C.G.) / 4. Executive Engineer, PublicWorks Department, Dist. Raigarh (C.G.) ^ WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AWRIT IN THE NATURE OF IVIANDAMUS, PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI ETC.ORANYOTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER XI-HC-22 3D^rq5I Ri-li'* 3il|t?[ si?qra"nf%?[ T?r ^ ^ -s^ •^PTRPI, ^cilwre, fti-i^y an^r q3w. U- P- M®. 760/C'fc' IIKWi VkW 200 aiR?I ?^IIW'HittT '2S-2-2006 Advocate Shri Sameer Behar, counsel forfthe Shri Satssh Gupta, Dy. Govt. Acjvoc Appfication for urgent hearing i^ Heard. The petjtioner has filed thi^ Constitution of India on the ground th^t petitioner is entitled to be reguiarizecf dated 3-9-2002. !t is pojnted out tha cbl^'c'i^l 'Rffl^ff ^ t^t <(^^.f< ^aipOTan^i petitioner. for the Siate. allowed. petition under Artictes 226/227 of the even after completing 25 years of service, his services have notAeen regularize4 Counsel for the petitioner subr^iis that the petifioner is serving as Gangman since more than 25 years. He has fil^d copy.of Sen/jce Book, He submits fhat the undsr the Gangmen's Service Rules, 1996 Annexure P-2 and Cireulars Annextjre P-3 dated 9-4-2003 and Annexure P-4 representations as per Annexure P-6 were ma.de CQliectjvely and the same is penjdin'g. Itis also pointedout thatsome persons haye been regularized. j Learned State counsel pointed petitioner is pend.ing and the same wiil <j>ut that the representation submitted by the Ibeconsidered and decided. .. the Having considered and withoutl case, in the opinion of this Court, for direction is given to the petitioner to his grievances before the respondent| of the petition and this order, withf representation bein.g filed, the coitipei^nt the same on its own merits in accordii v/ithin three months from the date of made clear that if any grievance rer|iains availabie under the law. With the aforesaid observationsl . Certified copy as per rules. expressing any opinion on the merits ofthe present, ends of justice will be served if a rfiake a detailed representation afresh raising jno. 2 - Engineer-in-Chief along with a copy fn three weeks from today, and on such authority of the respondenfs shall decide knce with law as early as possible preferably i|eceipt/ produetion of the representation. It is the petitioner may avail the remedy. this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [4^^fe^