CWP(T) No.2852 of 2008(OA(D) No.94/94 21.8.2009 Present: Mr. Rajesh Verma, vice Mr. Ranjan Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Mr. Anshul Bansal, Addl. A.G. and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant A.G. for respondent No.1. Mr. G.D. Sharma, counsel for respondent No.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that on the basis of pay fixation, the pay of the petitioner was enhanced but vide order dated 13.4.1994 Annexure A-1 the pay of the petitioner has been reduced. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the pay of the petitioner was reduced without notice to him. This fact has not been denied by learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that his case is covered by judgment dated 19.6.2009 passed by learned single Judge in CWP(T) No.2850(OA-D-66/94), titled Girdhari Lal vs. State of H.P. and another. This again has not been denied by learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents. Accordingly, in view of judgment dated 19.6.2009, the petition is allowed. Annexure A- 1 dated 13.4.1994 so far petitioner is concerned is quashed and set aside. It is open to respondent No.2 to re-fix the pay of the petitioner after giving due notice to him. No recovery shall be made from the petitioner on the basis of Annexure A-1 dated 13.4.1994. Petition stands disposed of. ( Kuldip Singh ) Judge. August 21, 2009 (sks)