1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.885 OF 2005. Sunil S/o Kalyanmal Bharuka and another ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents. ... Mr.S.P.Sonpawale, advocate for the petitioner - absent. Mr.K.G.Patil, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for the State. Mr.P.F.Patni, advocate for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4. ... CORAM : P.V.HARDAS AND : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,JJ. Date : 12.04.2010. PER COURT 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner when this petition is called out for 2 hearing. None had appeared on behalf of the petitioner when this petition was on board on 15.3.2010 and accordingly had been adjourned for today. Today also none appears on behalf of the petitioner when the petition is called out. 2. Learned counsels for the Respondents state that the reliefs sought for by the petitioner in this petition have been rendered infructuous in the light of the removal of the encroachment. 3. Since none appears on behalf of the petitioners, this petition is dismissed for default. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) (P.V.HARDAS,J.) asp/office/wp88505