i^Ct.)n^/es IH THE STATE ADMINISTRA31IVE TitIBUMAL AT JABALPUR f^ O. A. 10.^: ^ OF 1996 pETiTiGgrm : 7. Wi. Khobragade aged aboirfc 59 years son of Skri Botiram KMobragade resideat of C/o.Smt.Pratibha Chouhaia, Ad^oc ate» Kas airidiM» Byirg(MP) vs&sus RESPONDEITS ;1.The State of Madhya Pradesh thrcmgh Secretary, Depart- meMt of Commercial Tax, Vallabh Bhawan, Bfaopal (M.P). 2.11ae Divisional Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Civil Lines, Raipur (H.P) 3»The Director, ©irectorate of Pexisio^i and BSnployees Welfare, 2-21, 2one-1, - M.P. lagar, Bhopal (M.P). 4.The Joint Direetor, Treeisury and Acco^nts(Pension)y Raipur (M.P). PPLICATIQM UNDER SSCTIQN-19 OF THE ADHIHIS'mATITC TRIBUNALS ACT* 1985 T»^a ^^+^.-l ^L-A^ HIGH COIJRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmONYS) No. 1312 of2005 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS T.M.Khobragade. VERSUS State ofM.P. and three others. SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: None for the petitioner. Slm N.N.Roy, Panel La^yer forthe State. ORDERCORAL) (Passed on 17th day of November, 2009) 1. The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. 2. In view ofthe above, the matter is dismissed for want ofprosecution. 3. Registry is directed to seiid a copy ofthis order to the petitioner; forthwith. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ) Gov.Ti