HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 22261 OF 2004 Dated 25-11-2005 Between : 1. Vangara Sammaiah, son of Kataiah, late Kataiah, aged 75 years, Freedom Fighter, resident of H.No.10-5-119, Girmajipet, Warangal and another. …..petitioners. And: 1. The Government of A.P. represented by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and another. …Respondents. ORDER : This writ petition is filed by the petitioners who are two in number with a prayer to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring that the petitioners are entitled for allotment of house sites of 500 sq. yards each within the Urban Agglomeration, Ranga Reddy District in pursuance of G.O.Ms.No.472, dated 22-05-1993. 2. Pending the writ petition, 2nd petitioner died and accordingly, petition so far as he is concerned stood abated. The writ petition is considered in respect of the 1st petitioner-Vangara Sammaiah. 3. It is the case of the 1st petitioner that he is a Freedom Fighter Pensioner and he is entitled for allotment of 500 sq. yards of house site as per the G.O. Ms.No.472, dated 22-5-1993. It is his grievance that his applications made for allotment of house site proved to be futile. Therefore, he has chosen to approach this Court by invoking jurisdiction under order 226 of the Constitution of India. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the 1st petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents 1 and 2. 5. It appears that the 1st petitioner is a Freedom Fighter Pensioner. He submitted representation seeking allotment of house sites under G.O. Ms. No.472, dated 22-5- 1993. Earlier, he filed W.P. No.14603 of 2000 and the said writ petition came to be disposed of on 31-12-2001. The relevant portion of the order in the said writ petition reads as follows: “Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to consider the application of the petitioner dated 27-03-1994 in terms of G.O. Ms. No.472, dated 22-05-1993 if not already disposed of. This exercise shall be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.” 6. The grievance of the petitioner is that inspite of the direction, no orders have been passed on his representations. Copies of representations have been placed on record. 7. In that view of the matter, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representation of the 1st petitioner for allotment of house plots in accordance with G.O. Ms. No.472 dated 22-5-1993 and pass appropriate orders within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. __________________________ Justice B. SESHASAYANA REDDY Date : 25th November, 2005. Dvs HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 22261 OF 2004 Dated 25-11-2005