1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.8168 OF 2010 Madhukar s/o Rajaram Patil Petitioner Versus Smt.Mainabai w/o Bhagwan Patil and another Respondents Mr.P.R.Katneshwarkar, advocate for the petitioner. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 20 th September, 2010. P.C.: 1 Petition is directed against an order dated 29.03.2010, passed by Ad hoc District Judge-2, Jalgaon, whereby the appellate Court, while allowing the appeal, directed restoration of the proceedings in Regular Civil Suit No.24/2000 on the file of Civil Judge, Junior Division, Raver. 2 The suit presented by Respondents came to be dismissed on account of default. The restoration application tendered was also rejected. As such, appeal was preferred to the District Court. The District Court, after considering rival contentions, was pleased to allow the appeal and directed restoration of the suit. 2 3 I have perused the order passed by the appellate Court. The order passed by appellate Court is reasonable and proper and does not call for any interference in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution. Petition is devoid of substance. 4 Writ Petition stands rejected. (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE ******* adb/wp816810