IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 9958 of 2005 Between: 1. K. Kali Prasad, S/o. Bulli Raju, aged about 53 years, Presently working as NMR Electrician, Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority, Visakhapatnam. 2.J. Satyanarayana, S/o.Suryanarayana, aged about 47 years, Presently working as NMR Electrician, Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority, Visakhapatnam. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1. The Vice Chairman, Visakhapatnam, Urban Development Authority, Visakhapatnam. 2. The Government of A.P. represented by its Principle Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Secretary, Finance Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent No.1 in not regularizing the services of the petitioners though the petitioners have completed about 15 years of service as Electricians (NMR basis) in the office of 1st respondent i.e., from dt.12-11- 1990 and 11-12-1990 is highly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially declare that the petitioners are entitled for regularization of their services in terms of the G.O.Ms.No.212 F & P (FW.PCIII) Department, dated 22-04-1994 and G.O.Ms.No.112 F & P(FW.PC.III) department, dated 23-7-1997 in the category of Electrician (or absorb as work inspector by taking into consideration of their qualification and service rendered by them) from the date of their appointments with all consequential benefits. Counsel for the Petitioner :MR.K.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN. & URBAN DEV. The Court at the stage of admission made the following : ORDER: Seeking to declare the action of the respondent No.1 in not regularizing the services of the petitioners though they have completed about 15 years of service as Electricians (NMR basis) in the office of the 1st respondent, i.e., from dt.12-11-1990 and 11-12-1990, as illegal and arbitrary, the present writ petition is filed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, no order can be passed against the respondents. Therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I feel it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to consider the petitioners’ case for regularization in accordance with rules and regulations. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________ K.C.BHANU, J. Dated: 27..04..2005. Note: Copy in two days. (B/O) RNS To 1. The Vice Chairman, Visakhapatnam, Urban Development Authority, Visakhapatnam. 2. The Principle Secretary, Government of A.P. Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3. The Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Finance Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 4. Two CCs to G.P.for Municipal Administration, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad(OUT) 5. Two CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{ }