IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 30TH MAY 2008 / 9TH JYAISHTA 1930 W.P(C).No. 13076 of 2008(F) ---------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. BALAJI.K.P., AGED 47 YEARS S/O. K.K. PURSHOTHAMAN, KUMARAKOM, KOTTAYAM 2. MANJU ANANDAKUTTAN, AGED 38 YEARS, W/O.ANANDAKUTTAN K.P. KARIYIL PARAMBU (H) KUMARAKOM, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.A.K.ABDUL AZEEZ SMT.M.R.JAYALATHA RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. SECRETARY, RTA ,KOTTAYAM 2. ANILKUMAR, PEEDIKAPARAMBIL, KANJIRAMATTOM, KOTTAYAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SRI. K.V. MANOJ KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 13076 OF 2008 F = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 30th May, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioners submit that Ext. P4 objection has been filed against the timing that was proposed in favour of the 2nd respondent. According to the petitioners without considering the objection, timing conference was scheduled to be held and hence this writ petition has been filed. 2. The learned Govt. Pleader, on instruction, submits that the timing conference was originally scheduled to be held on 6.4.2008. But on that day it could not be held and the objection was not received. It is stated that the timing conference was adjourned to 19.4.2008 and was held on that day. In view of this, there is no question of now directing the 1st respondent to consider the objection stated to have been filed by the petitioners and if the petitioners are aggrieved by the timing scheduled, it is for them to pursue the statutory remedies that are available. The writ petition fails and is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-