C.W.P No. 14665 of 2003 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No. 14665 of 2003 Date of decision : December 08, 2008 Smt Sunita Devi, ...... Petitioner through Mr.S.S.Sodhi, Advocate v. State of Punjab and others, ...... Respondents through Mr.A.S.Jattana, Addl.A.G.Punjab CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) This writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 31.10.2000 (Annexure P-12), whereby the petitioner was held to be ineligible on the ground that she did not have necessary qualification on 31.10.1996 (which was the extended cut of date of eligibility fixed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court). It is the case of learned counsel for the petitioner that subsequently, by a process of re-evaluation, the petitioner was declared passed and, therefore, the amended result would have to relate back to the original date of result viz 7.10.1996. He has also argued that there are vacancies still available with the respondents. However, the learned counsel has no explanation for the delay of almost 34 months in filing the C.W.P No. 14665 of 2003 ::2:: present writ petition. Faced with this situation, counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to move a representation to the respondents taking the above pleas. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforestated. In case, such a representation is made within four weeks from today, respondent No.2 shall dispose of the same, in accordance with law, by passing a speaking order within a further period of eight weeks. ( AJAY TEWARI ) December 08 , 2008. JUDGE `kk'