IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL, TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.ASHOK KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO : 14197 OF 1999 Between: K.Pandari Swamy S/o.K.Naganna Municipal Corporation of Kurnool. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of A.P Rep. by its Secretary, Municipal Administration Secretariat Buildings Hyderabad. 2 The Special Commissioner and Director of Municipal Administration, MDH complex 4th Floor Hyderabad. 3 The Commissioner Kurnool Municipal Corporation Kurnool Dist. 4 The Registrar APAT Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction or writ more particularly one in the nature or Writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings impugned Rc.No.5666/97-E1, dt.3-2-1999 issued by the 3rd respondent is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and further direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in service till he attains the age of 60 years declaring that the non passing of the orders by the A.P. Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.3038/99 is arbitrary and illegal, contrary to the statutory rules and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.V.RAGHUNATH REDDY The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: (per THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI) M r . K.Rama Krishna, Advocate, representing learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed having become infructuous No order as to costs. ____________________ T.MEENA KUMARI, J. ___________________ S.ASHOK KUMAR, J. April 1, 2008 MAS.