1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5016/2010. ( Nirmala Jadhav Vs. The State of Maharashtra ) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ms. AN Ansari, Adv. for Applicant/s; Mr. SG Nandedkar, APP for State. Mr.AS Osmanpurkar, Adv. For Respondent No.2. *** CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 16 th June, 2011. 1) Heard finally. 2) The applicant, a police constable, remotely concern with the complainant Smt.Savita or her husband Ramdas, seeks quashment of – FIR dated 26.8.2010,giving rise to crime No.125/2010 of Beed Rural Police Station, Beed. 3) The FIR, at page 8 makes a sweeping reference with other accused of the present applicant, that she has also harassed the complainant Smt. Savita to purchase Ape Rickshaw by Ramdas. Nothing more is attributed as against the present applicant. Present applicant is not a family member of husband Ramdas. There is no allegation of any beating, assault or humiliation at the behest of present applicant Smt. – Nirmala. 4) Taking these aspects into consideration, the F.I.R. to the extent of present applicant/accused Smt. Nirmala, does not make a specific – case against her to proceed with the prosecution and consequently, the FIR is quashed and set aside to the extent of applicant Smt. Nirmala. – 5) Criminal Application is allowed as above. 6) Office to arrange to pay necessary fees to the counsel for respondent no.2 (original complainant.). (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/