-^- Vs. 1. 2. ShyaiTi Sharma, S/o, Shri Rdheshyain Sharma, Aged about 32 years, R/o. Hatari Bazar, Durg, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Pood, Ci'vil Supplies ' and Consui-ner Protection, Mantralaya, Dau Kaiyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Chhattisgarh Rajya Sahakari Vipajian Sangh Mar^'adit, 880, Civii Lines, MukhyaSaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) through its Managng Director, Raipur ;Chhattisgarhj Coilector (Food) District Durs (Chhattisgarhj Zila Vipanan Adhikari Chhattisgarh Rajya Sahakari Vipanan Sangh Mai-s-adit, Durg (Chhattisgarh) WR!T\PBTiTION UNDER ARTICLS 226 OF THE CONSTITUT30N OF t3. 4. I: HonTale Mr. Satish K. Aeaihotri, J. Shri Maniadra Shrivastava, Senior Advocte witti Shri Airoz Khaa, coiuisel for fhe petitioner. Slrri. Si.unesh Bajaj, Goverainent Advocate for fhe State, iTl 1. Learued counsel appeaiing for tlie petitioner siibiaits that the petitioner is aggrieved by tlie fact fhat the petitioner has been denied fhe benefits ofciicuiai- dated 31.10.2007 issued by tlie. Food, Civfl. SuppUes and Consumer Protection Depai-tment and as such they are not getting fh.e beiiefit of custoni iniUiug systeia. He turther subinits that flie petitioner has subinitted a representation to tlie Collector (Food) Dtu-g, on 17.11.2007 (Annexure P/16). Despite all eflbrts, tlie CoUector, Durg is proceediiig wifh fhe agl-eeiaents with. other parties without decidiiig his representation. 2. In fhe facts aiid circuinstaaces of fbe case, it is expedient fh.at tiie CoUector, Durg be directed to consider aad decide fhe representation dated 17.11.2007 (Aniielxure P/16) m. accordance with law wifhm. a period of one week aitd fb.e CoUector shall pass a reasoned order oii. the issue. 3. In view of the 1'oregom.g, tlie petition stands disposed of. 4. Certified copy wifh.ia 24 hours. Suguaa Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge