IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 2986 of 2007 Between: M.Manasa Reddy D/o.M.Satyanarayana Reddy R/o.Flat No.501, Sirisha Residency Santhinagar, Masabtank, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Dr.N.T.R.University of Health Sciences, rep. by its Registrar, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2 The Joint Registrar (Examinations) Dr.N.t.r.University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 3 Bhaskar Medical College, Rep. by its Principal, Yenkapally (v) Moinabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 4 State of A.P. rep. by the secretary, Medical & Health, Secretariat, Hyd. R4 is impleaded as per court order dt. 22-3-2007 .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the letter dated 13.02.2007 issued by the 3rd respondent as illegal, arbitrary and set aside the same and also set aside the letter No. 08284/E2(a)/MBBS 2006/Part file dated 12.2.2007 issued by the 2nd respondent and consequently direct the respondents to give effect to the results declared on 5.2.2007 for the 1 year MBBS in respect of the petitioner and continue the petitioner to prosecute the II year MBBS course in the 3rd respondent college by declaring that the petitioner is validly promoted to the II year MBBS Course after clearing all the subjects in the I year MBBS Examination in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.M.RATNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: MR.D.V.NAGARJUNA BABU The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON’BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI Writ Petition No.2986 of 2007 ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that in view of the subsequent developments, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication on merits. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _______________ 28.04.2009 VGB