BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fifteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15919 of 2011 1 P. KRISHNAN 2 P. MAILAMMAL 3 P. SUNDARAM 4 ANURATHA 5 D. VAIRAMANI 6 THAVAM 7 JAYARAJ ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED(RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, NILAKKOTTAI, IN CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2011, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. J.LAWRANCE Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are arrayed as accused and they prayed for grant of anticipatory bail under sections 438 Cr.P.C., for the alleged offences punishable under Section 498(A) I.P.C and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.Heard Mr.J.Lawarance, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that on the basis of the complaint given by the de-facto complainant, enquiry is pending. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai, Dindigul District and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai, Dindigul District and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 15/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NILAKOTTAI, DINDIGUL DIST 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, NILAKKOTTAI, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S. J.LAWRANCE Advocate SR.No.43870 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15919 of 2011 Date :15/12/2011 SMA/16.12.2011/6C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/