IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 5095 of 2011. Date of Decision : July 5, 2011 Chetna Kumari … Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others … Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R. K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. Vinod Thakur, Dy. A.G. for the respondents-State. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:- “(i) That the termination of the services of the petitioner may kindly be quashed and set-aside and the respondents be directed to reinstate back the present petitioner and she may be allowed to work as Mid-Day Meal worker in the same School/capacity under which she was working. (ii) That the respondents may kindly be directed to consider the case of the present petitioner sympathetically taking into consideration all aspect of the matter within time bound period. 2 (iii) That the respondents may kindly be directed to release the salary of the petitioner for the period of Sept. 2010 to till date.” 2. The petitioner may bring her grievance to the notice of the second respondent in which case the second respondent will look into the matter and take appropriate action, in accordance with law, after hearing the affected parties also. In case the due and admissible wages/remunerations have not been paid to the petitioner, the same shall also be paid. This shall be done within a period of four months from the date of the production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the second respondent. 3. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s) if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. July 5, 2011 (PK/hl)