IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3182 OF 2005 IN APPEAL (LODGING) NO.1093 OF 2005 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.14 OF 2005 IN PETITION NO.22 OF 2002 Shantaben Ramanlal Khambholja Appellant versus Rekha Girish Khambolja & anr. Respondents Mr.V.S.Kapse i/by Mr.Ajit Kenjale for appellant. Mr.Sanjay Jain i/by M/s.S.K.Srivastav & Co. for respondents. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATE : 25th October 2005 PC : 1. Heard learned counsel for parties. Notice of Motion seeks condonation of delay of 33 days in filing the appeal. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion and affidavit in reply. For the reasons stated in the affidavit, sufficient cause is shown for condoning the delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bona fides. Hence Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)