r"~"" ^^ L^^)^^ THE STAIE.ABMNISTKATIVB ^BIBUNA PRII-CIPAL ffi^CH AT JABALPUR. Original Application No«A—-<s—of 1998 • OBIGIKA iPPLICAIION U1 ^GTION 19 OF Kffi ADffiNISLTRATIVE._2RIMI^LS AGT^_1985. |lllliiUJllllll»l""1' Apj)licarxt_<, Sanooy Kumar Hahar SOR of Eitadesh-wari Baw aged about 24 years, residents o£ village-Bimda, Tahsil Bagicha, Bistt:! Raigarh. 'Versus^ Responden.ts* ;,::: 1 .State of M.P. Through tfae Secretary Eie-pt< of Agricultare^ Vallabh Bhav^an^ Bhopal M.P, 2» Joint Birector^ Etept o£ Agricaltare^ Bilaspur Division, Bilaspiir^ M<Pc 5. Bodhiram Chauhan, Besident o± Bag Bahar, Tahsil Pathal Gaon, .stts Raigarh N.Po ^PLIGATION Vm£R SEC2ION 19 OF <EmS_A»1« ACT_,_,19S5. ^"^T ^|<41d<LI, ^ni^^Ko, f®i<rll^y ^° +<1*<^11 $hHra> 3TT^?T ''^T^ _.^..:M^...illl. 'WI. 20(^~ 'l^^sr" 3TT^T^T 'f^ri^^n^T 9b^i<=t) ^f^a ^ v ^n^ ^T[^T'^TT8;R ^rf^T CM^f<n<fli TipT^rf ^ fe^t <F^^i< ^ ^rf^TH 377^T SE: KON'BLE EVEANiNDRA IVSOti AN SHRSVASTAVA.J. 08.01.2010 When the matter wascailed ouf for hearing, none appeared for the petitioner and the matter was passecp over. Even in the second round, none had .appeared for the petitioner. | Shrl Bhaskar Payashi, Panel L^ 1 &2. iwyer for the State/respondents No. None for respondent No.3. Taking into consideration, the rfature of controversy invoived in the petltion, the ipistant petltion is dis|missed for want of prosecution. However, a iiberty is reserved to the p^tltioner to revive the petition. A copy of this order be sent to t|ie petitloner. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Jude [Tft^ ^Ra^