IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15174 of 2010 PAWAN SAH, SON OF LATE RAM SAGAR SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DAMAILI GHAT, P.O. SANJHA GHAT, MIRGANJ, POLICE STATION MIRGANJ, DISTRICT- PURNEA. … PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PURNEA. 5. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PURNEA. 6. GRAMIN SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MIRGANJ, PURNEA. 7. OFFICER INCHARGE, MIRGANJ, PURNEA. 8. RAMCHHABILA SINGH S/O LATE SAHI NARAIN SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- DAMAILIGHAT, WISTARA TOLA, POLICE STATION MEERGANJ, DISTRICT- PURNEA. … RESPONDENTS. ----------- 4. 12.01.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner is the raiyat of 2.62 acres of land bearing Plot No. 618 and 619 appertaining to Khata No. 348 of village Damaili, P.S. Mirganj in the district of Purnea. He has acquired the aforesaid land vide two sale deeds from Sri Rajendra Choudhary who has also sworn affidavit to the aforesaid effect which is contained in Annexure-3 to this application. Present writ petition has been filed to direct the Private Respondent No.8 not to use any portion of the aforesaid land as a road. In this connection, it is pointed out that earlier Private Respondent No.8 had filed a petition under Section 147 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Sub-divisional Officer, Dhamdaha, Purnea praying inter alia to permit him to use the portion of the aforesaid land as 2 a road. Aforesaid petition was dismissed by the Sub- divisional Officer under orders dated 29.4.2003 which is contained in Annexure-2 to this application. From paragraph-15 of the writ petition, it appears that against the aforesaid order dated 29.4.2003 Criminal Revision No.279 of 2003 has been preferred by Respondent No.8 which is pending in the Court of Sessions Judge, Purnea. 3. Having heard counsel for the parties, it is directed that the Criminal Revision No. 279 of 2003 be disposed of by the Sessions Judge, Purnea at the earliest so as to ensure that the dispute between the petitioner and Private RespondentNo.8 comes to an end at the earliest. 4. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition is disposed of. Ibrar/- ( V.N. Sinha, J.)