IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33445 of 2008 RAVI KANT SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR - - - - 2. 3.9.2008 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the petition. Heard. The petitioner appears absenting himself from the trial which was under Sections 323 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code and the informant has appeared through his counsel and he has resisted the present petition tooth and nail. The contention is that The petitioner remained in presence till 1994 and the trial could not came to an end, whereafter the petitioner entrusted the pairvi to some of his pairvikars and went out side for earning livelihood and in the meantime his bond was cancelled on account of his absence as the pairvikar did not inform him about the dates. The petitioner is in custody since 5.5.2008. Let the above named petitioner be directed to be released from custody on his 2 furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Chapra, in Dariyapur P.S.Case No. 169 of 1989, G.R. No. 2497 of 1989. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)