n© IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BODARI, BILASPUR :^5 OF 2011. CONTEMPT CASE (C) No. :^5 PETITIONER Smt. Chhaniya Sahu, W/o. Shri Padum lal Sahu, aged about 42 years, Resident of »"\ \ \ ^y^ " 11L. Behind of Nandu Garrage, ^^'.. "'""^"' -— —^, ^^" Telipara, Bilaspur, District ^...^.^:"\\ ^^^":^°v' T^^^~ RESPONDENT CONTEMNOR ^^s-.^^<^ Bilaspur (C. G.), VERSUS : 1. M. K. Raut, Secretary School Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. K.S. Pisda, Director/Commissioner, Public Instruction Chhattisgarh Raipur (C.G.), Arising out ofW. P. (S) No. 1594/2005, orderdated 16.07.2010 CONTEMPT CASE (C) UNDER SECTION 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION (12) OF CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT EI W^T^FT f<-li<=h 3T1^T sti*iicr> -yf^a Deepti ^ST^PTI^FT, ^nl^^Ko, [^<ni^y sn^r ^^ ^^..^£..^.0^; •I^^T" .3^-pt 200 <^ 3^T ^^H^R'Hf^T SB : Hon'ble ShrE Manindra Svlohah Shrivastava. J Q3-02^011 Shri Somkant Verma, counseji Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner passed order on 16/7/2010, directiijig the case of the petitioner and appropriate orders, the matter is taken by the respondent. To my mind, this petition apft passing order, did not prescribe an^| it cannot be said that the process such an extent to initiate contempt The petition is accordingiy d( fresh, if eventuajityso arises. cblAli<rl4lTi 'RF^ff"? 'f^ft <fa^l< '^sri^FT^iTT^T for the petitioner. submits that though this Court had the concemed respondent to consider |ake decision in the matter and pass ^tili pending and dedsion has not been tears to be premature. This Court, while time limit to take dedsion. At this stage, taking decislon has been so deiayed to plroceedings. (smissed as premature with iiberty to file f4r Sd/" Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge [^