c^^-^/^ @ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHATBILASPUR W.P. (S) No. <^,Z- OF 2011. PETITIONERS ^%^ .^'y,^<i^-"' ^^y ..'w o^ : 1. Jaganu Ram Pawar, S/o. Shri Budhu Ram Pawar, aged about 52 years, Head Master, Girls Uchh Primary School Keshkal, Block Keshkal, District Bastar (C. G.) 2. Naval Kumar Nag, S/o. Shri Lahar Singh Nag, aged about 58 years, Head Master, Govt. Primary School Byalpur, Block Keshkal, District Bastar (C. G.) 3. Ganesh Prasad Nag, S/o. Shri Ram Nath Nag, aged about 55 years, Head Master, Govt. Primaiy School Godripara (Manjhichera), Block Keshkal, District Jagdalpur (C. G.) 4. Supet Ram Deewan, S/o. Shri Budhu Ram Deewan, aged about 55 years, Head Master, Govt. Primaiy School Pipara, Block Keshkal, District Bastar (C. G.) 5. Mangal Ram Yadav, S/o. Shri Bishram Yadav, aged about 55 years, Head Master, Govt. Middle School Gudrapara (Garka), Block Keshkal, District Bastar (C. G.) 6. Murha Ram Shori, S/o. Shri Shobha Ram Shori, aged about 56 years, Head Master, Govt. Higher Secondary School Bahigaon, Block Keshkal, District Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.). s."-^ 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Bastar, District Bastar (C. G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Keshkal, District Bastar (C.G.) 4. Treasury Officer, Treasury Account and Pension, Bastar, District Bastar (C. G.) S^i^ii®?,B'ssS?@f,y,KSSS?.'Sgii^'5^^I^^^^^^^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IIISif?; !!1r':;i:: ! '''%. -L. ^ ~' '^^^'' ^' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISOARH AT BILASPUR WRTT PETmON (S) No. 762 of2011 PETmONER :JagamiRamPawar&Others. VERSUS RE8PONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA • ' -, . /" SB: Hon'Ue Shri Satish K. Aeiuhotri. J. Present: 8hriSomkatitVemia,Advoeateforthepetttioaers. Shri Ajit Singh, Panel Lawyer for the State/reSpondents. ORDERfORAL) (Passed on 10th day of February,2011) 1. The petitioners were initially appointed as Deputy Teacher on a fixed pay of Rs. 100/-. After completion ofin-obation period, they were granted regular pay scale. 2. Learaed counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in fhe ease is asto whether, the petitioners are entitled to regular pay seale 'w.&.f. the date of mitial appointment w after completion ofprobationperiod. 3. The issue involved, herein was considered by the MaAya Pradesh State Adnnnistrative TribunaL, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhttkant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State OfMJ^. & others), wherein it was held that ths similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale -w.ef. the date ofinitial appointment. The matteF was taken up to Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Han'bleSupreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the ^ Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from date ofinitial appomtmeHt. 4. Leamed counsel appearing for tfae petitioaers also submits that tfais court, while considering the same issue mAmar Sai Ram & others Vs. State ofChhattisgarh & others [W.P. (8) No. 4725/2006] by order dated 01.09.2006, allowed the petitioners to make a representation along with copy ofthe petition and annesau-es within a period often days, raising all their grievances and in tum the eoncemed respondent was directed to decide the representation in an objeetive manner within a period of 3Q days from the date of receipt of the representation. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are grMrted liberty to make a representation raising all their grievances and in tum, the concemed respondent is directed to decide the representation, if any, in accordanee vyith law, on ite o\m merits, wittoin a period-ofSweeks from the date ofreeeipt ofthe representation. 6. In view ofthe foregoing, 1his petition is disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit