IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN : PRESENT : THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No. 1527 of 2003 (Criminal Revision case under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C. to revise the order of the Court of the I Additional Sessions Judge, Guntur, made in Crl. A. No. 84 of 2001, dated 10-09-2003 preferred against the order of the Court of the Munsif Magistrate, Vinukonda, passed in C.C. No. 119 of 1998, dated 06-02-2001.) Between: Parimi Israel S/o Kotaiah. ..Petitioner/Accused. AND The State of A.P., rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. Respondent The case coming on for hearing, upon perusing the memorandum of grounds filed herein and the order of the High Court dated 27-6-2007 made here herein and 15-10-2003 made in Crl. MP. No.7123 of 2003 and upon hearing the arguments of Sri T. Sunil Kumar representing on behalf of Sri Y. Srinivasa Reddy, Advocate for the petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent, the Court made the following ORDER: “The record shows that on 27-6-2007, a representation has been made to this Court that the petitioner and his wife have compromised and they are living together. Recording the same, the matter was referred to Lok Adalath of Guntur District for making application to record the compromise. Today, when the matter is called, there is no material placed before this Court recording the compromise by the Lok Adalath, Guntur. Under the above circumstances, and in view of the submission made by the husband and wife, I don’t want to pass any orders on merits. But, however, in view of the fact that no compromise has been recorded by the Lok Adalath, Guntur and has been produced before this Court, but in view of the statement of Mr. T. Sunil Kumar representing on behalf of Mr. Y. Srinivas Reddy that the husband and wife have compromised the matter and they are living together, it would suffice if the revision is adjourned by eight weeks to produce a copy of the compromise and in failure either party can ask for re-hearing of the case. Post after eight (8)weeks.” ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 2 To 1. The Chairman, Lok Adalath, (District Judge), Nyaya Seva Sadan, District Court Compound Guntur, ( BY RPAD) 2. The Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Nyaya Seva Sadan, District Court Compound, Guntur ( BY RPAD) 3. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad ( BY SPECIAL MESSENGER) 4. The I Additional Sessions Judge, Guntur. 5. The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Vinukonda, Guntur District. 6. The Munsif Magistrate, Vinukonda, Guntur District. 7. Parimi Israel S/o Kotaiah., R/o. Puvada Village, Christian, Nuzendla lMandal, Guntur District.(BY RPAD) 8. The Superintendent, Central Jail, Rajahmundry. 9. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT). 10. One CC to Sri T. Sunil Kumar, Advocate (OPUC). 11. One spare copy. KK HIGH COURT TMKJ DT. 25-7-2007 NOTE: POST AFTER EIGHT (8) WEEKS ORDER CRL.RC.NO.1527 OF 2003 DIRECTION Drafted by: KK Drafted on: 26-7-2007 HIGH COURT TMKJ DT. 25-7-2007 NOTE: POST AFTER EIGHT (8) WEEKS ORDER CRL.RC.NO.1527 OF 2003 DIRECTION