•u?' Narendra Kumar Chandrakar S/o Shri Diwakar Prasad Chandrakar about 40 years, Assistant Teacher, Presently Posted at Go'v't. Primary School Kukara, Block - Arang Dist - Raipur (C.G.) l^il.^. ;NTS : 1. S'tate of Chhattisgarh Through • the Secretarv', Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bh, 9 Ths A il^ Hstrict Education Officer Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Block Educatiot District ff' r^. \ li^.U.l Shri C.R.Sahu, Advocate for the petitioBsr. Shri Vinay Pandey, Panel Lawyer for the State' lents 1 to 3. (Passed 0112aa ofApril, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner as weii as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the fact and question of law mvolved in ths present writ petition are the same to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. t ^. ^, MPJR-CG 96}, which has been dispo.sed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Leamed coimsel inng l respondente does not controvert the said submissipn. . In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 {Gopesh Kwnm' Venna vs. Tne State Govt. of ''hhattwgarh anotker) and other connected matters, decided by this Court on 15-12-2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondaty Education, Bhopal and tlie prospectus of Diploma in Education Examination, it was clarified that the nomenclatr.re ofthe Basic Training Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed and renamed as Diploma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by tfae decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 {Gopevh Kiinuir Verimi vs, The State Govt. of T) (Supra), Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in temis of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj another fi subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired D.Ed. Examination Certificats on lis own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and furtfaer whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Assi