•^4''•/..s:rv-'i» 't" ^^"'^ ,^H*li.el ^" H^*>S'^1 C f- ( -2TO IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR /2007 W.P. fS) No. PETITIONER .*'nyv,*'~ \^yx ^M^ (^^'^^ Shivlal Uike, Son of Late Shivnath Uike, aged about 37 Years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Nawatola, Post Bagnadi, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS KI:Fn °' a?. if ia t..'"•'r;..'.;;:;^-.<S '^&y? 'sy^ey /3. 4. 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon - District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Block Education Officer Block- Chhuriya District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department Rajnandngaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIO NS ^ '^'- XI-HC-78 *11*ICTI S»>*11<h 3^''<<i<<ici<4,®Tf1<ris,Riciitfy ^.^).Q?.?5).^OTS 200 3)1^1 4aw (>jqI^<s|<^eT) sii^r^rR-fi* gw aii^i »w*i Bablu s^grsKHfiCTsn^r 29.L20Q7 Mr. Soutam Khetrapal, Advo^ate for the petitioners. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel lai»ye(|for the respondents/Stote. WHh the consent of leamed mottew are heard finolly and dispo|sed of, Common order dictated in W fwssed separately. A copy of thid order be plac^d on the record of the connected writ petitwns, <M^Fd41-1 ^TP^ff^ te^ ^^IK ^a'ri^'q'an^r counscl appearing for the parties, the P. (a) No. K?2 of 2007 in open Court, Sd/- . Satish K. Agiuhotri Judge P.T.O. HI6H COURT OF CHHATTESeARH AT BILASPVR! SIN6LE BENCH : HON-BLE MR. SATISH K. A6NIHOTRI. J. WRCT PETTHON tS.) N0. 302 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Reaondents Hemant Kumar Uike State of Chhatt'i^arh and otiiers Petitjoner WRTT prrmoN rs.i NO. 303 OFzooy Shivtal Uike versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and others WRIT PETmON (S ) N0. 320 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents yersus Bhojny Ja9ane State of Chhatt'isgarh and o-thers WRFT PETTTION (5.1 N0. 321 OF 2007 Petitjoner Romkishun versus Respondents : State of Chhatt'isgarh and others WRTT PFrmON (S) N0. 323 OF 2007 tetitjoner Re^iondents versus Kalarum Phulkunwir Stoite of Chhattisgarh and others WRIT PFTmON fS.l N0. 332 OF 2007 PetWoner Respondents versus Smt. Jagita Sewta S'tate of Chhatt-isgarh and others r WRTT PETCTKW 15.) N0. 333 OF 2007 Petitioner verajs Respondents Barsan Dos Kolure State of Chhatt^isgarh and o-thers WRFT PETTTtON (S.) N0. 334 OF 2007 Petitioner ; AA<msukh Lal Dewangan yersys Respondents : State of Oihatl'isgarh and ol+iers And WRFT PETmON (S.) N0. 362 OF 2007 Petitioner fteaaondents versus Sharod Kumar Thoduir State of Chhaf'isgarh and olhers Present : Mr. Soutam Khetrapal, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel tawyer for tfie State/respondents. OR&ER O'assed on 29th Ctoy of January, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel oppearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit ttiat the facts and question of law involved in 1he present batch of writ petitions are squarely covered by the decision of this Court' in the case of Yashwwit Kwmir BhmwdwaJ vs. Mwiic^ial Corparation. thwy and anothw^. 2. In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (.ffqpesh Kwnw Verma'vs. TTie State Sovt. of ChhatHyarh '~\ WMI <mathei) ond other conneeted matters, decided by -this Courf- on 15-12-2006, pursuant to -the memo dated 28-1-1995, isaied by the Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospeehis of 04>loma in Education Examination, it was ckirified -that -the nomenctature of the &isic Training Institute, i^., B.TJ. has been chdyiged and renamed as Diploma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Cerf'ificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (5.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gope^i Kumar Vermavs. The Stale Govt. of Oilvxtfisgcrh and cnolhei) (&ipra). 3. For -rtie aforemeaitioned reasons, the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of •this Court in the matter of yashimnt Kiimar aratS«Mj (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.T.I./D.Ed. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circutars dated 24-12-1998 oncf 1-3-1999 ond further whether they have been paid two advance Hicrements or not. No order as to costs. 4. A copy of this order be placed on "the record of the connected writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 2006(D:)MPJR-C696 Bablu