( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 81 OF 2010 Ajija Begum w/o. Anwar Khan .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Shri Shrikant Kulkarni h/f. Shri D.K. Kulkarni, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri B.V. Wagh, A.P.P. for respondent/State. CORAM : P.R. BORKAR,J. DATED : 15.02.2010 P.C. :- 1. Heard Adv. Shri Shrikant Kulkarni h/f. Adv. Shri D.K. Kulkarni for the petitioner and A.P.P. Shri B.V. Wagh for respondent/State. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With consent of learned advocates appearing for the parties, the writ petition he heard finally at the stage of admission. 3. This writ petition is filed for direction to the ( 2 ) Judicial Magistrate, First Class, IIIrd Court, Aurangabad, to pass appropriate orders in Criminal Misc. Application No. 1109 of 2009, which matter has been argued and written notes of arguments on behalf of the petitioner were filed on 23.12.2009. It is case of the petitioner that Imran was son of the petitioner. He was abducted on 21.02.2009 at 9.30 p.m. from Rubby Photo Studio, Baijipura, Aurangabad in Tata Sumo Jeep No. MH-21-C-2542. Imran did not return and inspite of search by the petitioner, he was not found. Ultimately, Imran’s dead body was found. On 24.02.2009 against sons’ of the petitioner the offences are registered under section 302 & 201 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. On 31.08.2009, the petitioner filed complaint making prayer that the Additional Director General of Police, C.I.D., Pune, should carry out investigation and send charge-sheet. It is stated that the matter was argued on 10.09.2009 and thereafter the matter was adjourned for orders on 18.09.2009, 25.09.2009, 06.10.2009, 09.10.2009, 31.10.2009, 10.11.2009, 20.11.2009, 30.11.2009, 04.12.2009 and 05.12.2009. Ultimately, written notes of arguments were filed on 23.12.2009. Still there was no order. Hence, this writ petition is filed. ( 3 ) 4. Without expressing any opinion on the tenability of the said Criminal Misc. Application No. 1109 of 2009 or the jurisdiction of the Magistrate to give direction as required in prayer clause (2) of the application, it can be said that the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, IIIrd Court, Aurangabad, ought to have passed some orders, which according to law is legal and proper. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this writ petition is disposed of with direction that the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, IIIrd Court, Aurangabad, should pass appropriate orders according to law, if not passed earlier, within three weeks from the receipt of writ of this Court. 5. The writ petition is accordingly allowed and rule made absolute. [P.R. BORKAR,J.] snk/2010/FEB10/crwp81.10