IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1261 of 2008 KAMLA DEVI & ANR Versus MARACH SAO & ORS ----------- 3 22.1.2009 This Court on merits would not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order inasmuch as the order passed by the court below allowing intervention of one Tetar Sao in the facts and circumstances of this case was fully justified. That is so because a registered deed of gift dated 14.7.2000, during the pendency of the suit itself, was made in his favour by defendant no.1 and therefore, if the said person on acquiring knowledge of the decree in favour of his vendor, which has been made subject matter of Title Appeal No. 9/2004, had sought intervention for protection of his right confined to the land covered by the deed of gift dated 14.7.2000, no error can be said to have been committed by the court below in allowing such intervention application. It is however, made clear that the interest of Tetar Sao will be confined only to the land covered by the registered deed of gift and ensure that even in the compromise made by the party, the same goes in the share of his vendor, the opposite party no.1 Marach Sao. The apprehension of the petitioner that a compromise petition may be unnecessarily kept pending 2 by the appellate court seems to be wholly misconceived and in fact, it is expected that the appellate court will definitely dispose of the appeal in terms of the compromise in accordance with law at an early date. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)