IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.89 of 2009 Bhupal Yadav & Ors Versus Kalpu Yadav & Ors ---------------------------------- 7 14-9-2011 Mr. Ratnakar Ambastha, advocate, appearing on the instruction of Mr. Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay, learned counsel for the petitioners, states that the impugned order in the present revision application is interlocutory in nature and as such the revision application is not maintainable. He makes a prayer to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in view of the decision in Durga Devi Vs. Vijay Kumar Poddar, reported in 2010(2)PLJR 954 . Mr. Jitendra Kishore Verma, learned counsel for the opposite parties, who has raised a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of this revision application on the same line, has no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel. The prayer is allowed. Four weeks’ time is allowed to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, failing which this revision application shall stand 2 rejected without further reference to the bench. roy ( V. Nath, J.)