WP 349/2004(S/B) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. Heard Sri R. Dobhal, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri L.P. Naithani, learned Senior Advocate on behalf of the H.N.B. Garhwal University and Sri V.K. Bisht for respondents 3 and 4. The short controversy involved in this writ petition relates to the factual dispute with regard to the merit of the selected candidates, the respondents 3 and 4 and the petitioner. The petitioner has approached the Chancellor, of H.N.B. Garhwal University. Since this Court cannot sit in appeal on the selection made by the Selection Committee, therefore we provide that the Chancellor of the University is expected to decide the representation of the petitioner U/S 68 of U.P. State University Act, within a period of one month, from the date of production of certified copy of this order With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (B.C.K.,J) (P.C.V.J.) 12-06-2006 ISB