In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ...... Criminal Misc.-M No.2033 of 2009 ..... Date of decision:22.1.2009 Satveer Kaur .....Petitioner v. Director General of Police Punjab and others .....Respondents .... Present: Mr. Shilak Ram Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... S.S. Saron, J. This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed seeking issuance of directions to the Police authorities-respondents No.1 to 5 to take legal action against the accused persons i.e. respondents No.6 to 10 for committing cheating, forgery and misappropriation by preparing and using forged and fabricated documents with mala fide intention to cause unlawful loss to the petitioner by grabbing her property for their unlawful gains. A prayer is made for registering a case under appropriate provisions of criminal law inter alia under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506, 120-B and 34 Indian Penal Code as despite several oral requests and legal notice dated 27.3.2008 (Annexure-P.1), application dated 2.5.2008 (Annexure-P.2) and representation dated 21.8.2008 (Annexure-P.3) submitted by the petitioner no action is being taken against the culprits i.e. respondents No.6 to 10 by the Police authorities (respondents No.1 to 5). Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The primary direction that has been sought in the present case Cr. Misc.-M No.2033 of 2009 [2] is for registration of FIR against respondents No.6 to 10. In this regard, it may be noticed that the petitioner has no where stated or shown that he approached the SHO concerned in terms of Section 154 of the Cr.P.C. for lodging the FIR. Besides, this Court is normally not to issue directions for registration of FIR. In Aleque Padamsee and others v. Union of India and others, (2007) 6 SCC 171, it was held by the Supreme Court that the correct position in law is that the Police officials ought to register a FIR whenever the facts brought to their notice show that a cognizable offence has been made out. In case the Police officials fail to do so, the modalities to be adopted are set out in Section 190 read with Section 200 Cr.P.C. Therefore, in case the petitioners are aggrieved by the inaction of the Police officials and they are not registering a FIR, the modalities contained in Section 190 read with Section 200 Cr.P.C. are to be adopted and observed. In view of the above, no directions are liable to be issued for registration of a FIR by this Court. Consequently, the criminal miscellaneous petition is devoid of any merit and the same is dismissed. January 22, 2009. (S.S. Saron) Judge *hsp*