IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.22641 of 1994 Between: Sura Bhuplreddy S/o. S.Ch. Kesalreddy aged 28 years, V.E.W., R/o. Akaveedu village, Racherla Mandal, Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Divisional Electrical Engineer, A.P.S.E.B(Operations), Markapur, Prakasam District. 2. The Superintending Engineer, A.P.S.E.B(Operations) Ongole, Prakasam District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not issuing the call letter to the post of Helper to the petitioner as being illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law, with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner along with candidates for appointment to the post of Helper. Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt. S. Swarna Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: Sri Samineni Kishore, S.C. for A.P.S.E.B. The Court made the following : ORDER: Smt. S. Swarna Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in this writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous without any order as to costs. ______________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J Date:08-07-2005. PV To 1. The Divisional Electrical Engineer, A.P.S.E.B(Operations), Markapur, Prakasam District. 2. The Superintending Engineer, A.P.S.E.B(Operations) Ongole, Prakasam Dist. 3. Two C.D. copies.