( 1 ) cra4733.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4733 OF 2010 1. Ram s/o. Bhanudas Kamble .. Applicants Age. 30 years, Occ. Labour 2. Sushilabai w/o. Bhanudas Kamble Age. 50 years, Occ. Labour, Both r/o. Khandeshwari Zopadpatti, Beed. Tq. & Dist. Beed. Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. A.M. Gaikwad, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. D.V. Tele, A.P.P. for respondent/State. CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR,J. DATED : 10.12.2010 P.C. :- 1. Heard. 2. The applicants are seeking regular bail under section 439 of the Cr.P.C. 3. Considering the averments in the F.I.R., it is ( 2 ) cra4733.10 amply clear that the prosecutrix, by name, Varsha was aged about 19 years at the relevant time and had gone together with one Vishal Kamble. The applicants are brother and mother of said Vishal Kamble and are named in the F.I.R, only for the reason that they acted in connivance with said Vishal. No specific overt act is attributed to them. In- deed, it prima facie appears that the offence may not come within the ambit of Sections 363 or 366 of the I.P.C., if the recitals of the F.I.R. are to be treated as gospel truth. 4. In view of the foregoing reasons, the application is allowed. The applicants are directed to be released on bail if they will furnish bail bonds in sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), each along with surety bonds in like sum. [V.R. KINGAONKAR,J.] snk/2010/DEC10/cra4733.10