1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9666 OF 2010 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Heard Mr. A.V. Patil, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B.L. Sagar Killarikar, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. This petition is filed being aggrieved by the order dated 31.8.2010, thereby the application for framing the issue about pecuniary jurisdiction has been allowed. Counsel for the petitioner submits that his application for amendment has not been decided. However, the application of the defendant is entertained and said issue is framed. According to the counsel for the petitioner, if the amendment application of the petitioner is considered, then in that case, the suit is maintainable. In my opinion, the grounds taken in this petition can be very well agitated before the trial court while 2 adjudicating the preliminary issue which is framed by the trial court in respect of the pecuniary jurisdiction. In this view of the matter, there is no substance in the writ petition. Writ petition stands dismissed. (S. S. SHINDE. J.) Date:25.11.2010. rlj/