IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.15415 of 1989 (O&M) Date of decision:23.03.2011 Shiv Darshan Singh and others ....Petitioners versus The State of Punjab and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: None . ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No. 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? No. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? No. ---- K.Kannan, J. (Oral) The petitioners have sought for quashing of the proceedings issued by the Chairman of Ludhiana Improvement Trust to show cause against acquisition of the land referred to within boundaries as a part of development-cum-housing accommodation scheme. The impugned notice calls upon any member of the public having any objection to the scheme to state the objection for the proposed scheme. The impugned notice does not adjudicate right of parties and I find, it was merely at the stage of proposal calling for objections from the parties. The writ Civil Writ Petition No.15415 of 1989 (O&M) - 2 - petition challenging such a proposal is not competent and even at the time when it was filed, it was premature. The writ petition is dismissed. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 23.03.2011 sanjeev