^. ^Y- IN TjrlB HIGn COURT OP CHHATTISGAR.H AT BILASpTJFL pgTITIONEiR Wr.it P@t.1t €on No, /2003 $ Sajixra ro Bhaiga, 47 year^, ^4pp©^^R-2 Mines, N.C.P.H. Colliery, P»0»'Haldi Badi Distt. Koriya(C.G.) •Viersu^ KBSPONDENTS $ 3.^. <Ehe Chiefi Managing Director Soath Easfeerncoa.L FieJLds Ltd, Seepat Roa<a» Bilasjpu^ .(C*G»)^ 2 • Th@ . Ch:i©£G@neral Manager, ^ S^E».C<»L<,^ Chirmxri Area .^'l'f^* • /'P •0,«-^®@tChirmiri Colliery ^•>3^$<" /. I>.i.stt. Koriya (C.Q*). ...€t?> >-"*"<0^%^' ^y^ •»y' ..'•' 'y ^_3:T_PETAT2pN UNDJSR, ARTIGLB 226 & M? QS' :THE CONSTITUTION OE- IN&A 3. The Technical Secretary/Director (Personnel) S.E^C.L., Seepat %Dad^ :Bilas|])Ur "(C^G.^ ) . 4, Th@- Sub Area Manageir/ N.C.P.H. c6,Miery, Hal<3i Ba<p:-, Dlstt. ^braya (C.G..), XJ-HC-22 "3T5^ t<ll^l<vt^ ^Tl1<14I<o, f®«y111My 3:n^'^i ftrll5t> 3?fl|t^T sd*ficn tii^n •N:^ '•^^ 3ffi^T X(^? Hl*l<!rtl ^NICh* 'l^tT' ^ 20d^ FT^?t ^WT^<yT^R: ^a 14.07.2003 Heard Shri Prafull BharatJ Learned coun^l for the p^titioner submits that the petitioner is working asClipperin N.C.P.H. C^llier'y at Haidi Badi, bistt. Korea. The petitioner'3 correct date of birt] Certificate issued by the Educ4tional Department, Orissa and even as per the AAedicaI Card issued by tjie Coiliery, which shows that in the year 1994 he was considered as 45 that as per Annexure P-13 date<| petition@r 019® wa^ recorded i^ whereas the respondents are petitioner as 15.07.1943 which is| not considering his case based o| above. Me further submits thatl th©Age Determincition Commiti the age as per the procedure petitioner's request, the respon< petitioner before the Age Oeter ct)k^i<rt^ TTP:t^f "^ fe^t <Pt^i< iF3^OT3T^?T counsel for the petitioner, i is 15th July, 1956 as per the Transfier ears of 090. Counsel further submits 26Tn February/2003, it shows thdt th® th th®Department as 15T" July, 1949, tonsidenng the date of birth of the [withoutanybasis. The respondents are h these documents which are mentioned |as per NCWA-IIE No.76 Issued on 25th April, 1988, if any dispute ?^g4r'di"9 theage ari^s and tt cannot be determined in the oirdinary cour|e, then the matter is to be referred to tee cxnd that Committee wiil determine ontained in CIause-B. In spite of the :' ^entS are rnot referring the case of the liination Commitree. XI-HC-22 '5"5?'^IPTI^FT, ^T?i<H4|<o, f®l<rtt«y ^TI^T ^T ft^ich w|t?r 5?»*iicb ^i^a <: Soma ^(H<rtl 5bH|cb 3n^?r x^ra? ....^•s?.:..^.0-^.' '^ 2003 I^^T" Sll^l ^WIW^^T - ^. direcfred The pepusal of the rele^ reveds that the submission petitioner appears to be just ar^ It \s therefore, representation before reSppnc then the respondents will refe| Committ^ee for determination| possible wiil determine the a| superannuation as per the report of that Committee the The petition is disposed Consequently, M.(W.)P.I^ stand disposed of. Certified copy be suppli< exi^ng <^^{<n<ili 'WT^if^ fe^t <Fait^i< ^^ri^^n^r /(ant documents annexeci with ths petition made by the iearned counsei for the (d proper- that if the petitioner moves. ony ents i &. 4 within a period of ten days, the cas©before the Age Determinatjon of age and the Committee as far as |e of th@ petitioner before his date of record and thereafter, based on the fespondents should take decision. )faccordin9Jy. Vo.1846/2003 & I.A.No.6159/2003 also d by tomorrow. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge [^^3^ 1