1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1. WRIT PETITION NO. 1900/2010 (JAISING BHIMSING PARDESI V/S THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. S.B.Talekar, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr. S.D.Kaldate, AGP for respondent State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:29-3-2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard. The writ petition is finally disposed of at admission stage. 2. The concern of the petitioner is, the order of the learned Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad dt.24.9.2009, whereby he refused to entertain, to stay the proceedings and, particularly, the mutation entry No.1246 concerning disputed land survey No.12 of village Shahnurwadi, taluka and District Aurangabad. 2 3. A query was made with the learned Divisional Commissioner as to how much time it will take if the entire revision is to be disposed of and the time sought was three to four months. 4. Taking these aspects into consideration, the learned Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad, will endeavour to complete hearing and decision in Revision No.ROR/REV/PT/224/2009 upto 29th June, 2010. Needless to mention, any construction carried at the site shall be subject to decision of the learned Additional Commissioner. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/1900-10wp