1 W.P.No.5289/10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.5289 OF 2010. Sindhubai W/o Balasaheb Galande ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents. ... Mr.A.A.Nimbalkar, advocate holding for Mr.V.D.Salunke, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.K.Kadam, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for the State. ... CORAM : NARESH H.PATIL & : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,JJ. Date : 12.01.2011. PER COURT 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner states that he has purchased certain immovable property but NA permission has been granted to the original 2 W.P.No.5289/10 landlord which order is against law and prejudicial to the interest of the petitioner. The petitioner had filed complaint in respect of conduct of the Tahsildar, who passed NA permission on 4.2.2003, with the Collector and the Lokayukta of the State of Maharashtra. 3. In respect of property rights of the petitioner, we observe that the petitioner is entitled to resort to appropriate alternate remedy if petitioner so desires. 4. As regards conduct of the Tahsildar, the petitioner had already approached the higher authorities. 5. The Writ Petition is disposed of. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) (NARESH H.PATIL,J.) asp/office/wp5289.10 3 W.P.No.5289/10