IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1188 of 1997 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- AGRICULTURE PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE Versus MAHENDRASINH BALVANTSINH CHUDASAMA -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR JAYANT PATEL for Petitioner MR AM DAGLI for Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE Date of decision: 19/01/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, this revision application stand disposed of in terms that the interim relief granted by this court on 5-9-1997 shall continue till the decision of the civil suit. Looking to the fact that the respondent is a Class IV employee and he has been dismissed from the services, learned trial court is directed to finally dispose of the suit within a period of six months from the date of receipt of writ of this order. 2. Shri Patel states that this court may observe that whatever observations made by the first appellate court while deciding the civil misc. appeal may not be taken to be final. This request of Shri Jayant Patel is wholly misconceived. These are the tentative observations or findings which are recorded only for the purpose of deciding the application filed by the respondent under Order 39 Rule 1, C.P.C.. Reference in this respect may have to the decision of the Apex Court in the case of P. Govindaswamy vs. S. Narayanan reported in 1987 (Supp) SCC 72. 3. The civil revision application and Rule stand disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. Liberty is granted to the respondent for revival of this revision application in case of any difficulty. ********** zgs/-