THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO Crl.R.C.M.P.No.200 of 2011 And CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.995 of 2005 ORDER: This criminal revision case filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. by the petitioner-appellant-Accused No.1 against the judgment, dated 22.07.2004 rendered in Criminal Appeal No.88 of 2004 by the III Additional Sessions Judge, Karimnagar, confirming the judgment of conviction and sentence passed in C.C.No.75 of 2003 by the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Special Mobile at Karimnagar, whereby and where under the petitioner was convicted under Section 248(2) Cr.P.C. for the offence punishable under Section 498-A IPC and sentenced to undergo SI for a period of six months and to pay a fine of Rs.2000/- in default, to suffer SI for a period of one month. 2. Heard both sides. 3. Today, the de facto complainant – Sathineni Sarojana and the revision petitioner-accused Sathineni Venugopal are present and they filed a petition under Section 320 Cr.P.C. stating that they are going to compound the offence. It is reported by the complainant that the matter is settled out of court between herself and her husband and prays to acquit the accused. 4. As the matter arises out of matrimonial disputes and as the complainant herself reported that the matter is settled and in view of the provision under Section 320 Cr.P.C., under which the petitioner is entitled for acquittal, the petition for compounding the offence is allowed. 5. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is allowed and the accused is acquitted under Section 320(8) Cr.P.C. _______________ RAJA ELANGO, J. 27th January 2011, Rns.