1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER SB Civil Writ Petition No.1381/2008 (Letter Petition) Umrav Vs State of Rajasthan 13.12.2010 HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Sandeep Pathak - for the petitioner Mr NR Saran, Dy Govt Counsel for respondents BY THE COURT: This writ petition has been filed to claim first regular parole. It is stated that petitioner has already undergone more than one-half of sentence awarded to him. He applied for benefit of parole but the same has not been extended to him. Learned counsel for respondents submits that case of the petitioner was considered and in view of adverse remarks by the Superintendent of Police benefit of parole has been denied. I have considered rival submissions made by learned counsel for parties and perused the record. Petitioner had already undergone one-half of the total sentenced awarded to him. His conduct in jail is not found to be adverse and even adverse recommendation does not exist from the Social Welfare Department. Looking to the aforesaid, I am inclined to grant parole for twenty days to the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. The Superintendent of Central Jail, Ajmer is directed to release 2 petitioner on parole for twenty days from the date of his release on furnishing his personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the jail authority with the stipulation that he shall surrender himself and return back to the Central Jail, Ajmer on expiry of twenty days. He shall maintain peace and tranquillity during period of parole which will include journey period also. In case he fails to surrender on stipulated date, the jail authorities shall proceed in accordance with law. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma