IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19120 of 2010 ARVIND SAO @ ARVIND KUMAR . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 4/ 02/07/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The submission in a police case under Sections- 395 and 412 of Indian Penal Code and 25 (1- B)A/26/35 of the Arms Act is that the owner of the truck with which the petitioner is alleged to have been caught, has stated that the truck was seized by the police one day prior to the occurrence. The allegations are of two vehicles intercepting a third and then cornering it on the highway and looting. The F.I.R. stated that the driver and Khalasi of the looted truck recognized the accused. The petitioner is named as one of them and is similarly situated with co-accused whose bail applications have been rejected in Cr. Misc. No.11798/10 and Cr. Misc. No.17468/10. This Court is not persuaded to grant bail to the petitioner. The application is rejected. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)