IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5616 of 2007 Pushpa Kumari, W/o Sri Sanjay Kumar, Resident of Village & P.O. Kanjari, P.S. Beldor, District Khagaria. ------ Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna. 2. The Secretary, Primary and Adult Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Khagaria. 4. The Block Development Officer, Beldor Block, District Khagaria. 5. The District Education Officer, Khagaria. 6. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Kanjari, Beldor Block, Khagaria. 7. The Mukhia, Gram Panchayat Raj, Kanjari, Beldor Block, Khagaria. 8. The Principal, C.M. Science College, Madhepura. 9. Kumari Indu, W/o Sri Shublesh Yadav, Village & P.O. Kanjari, P.S. Beldor, District Khagaria. -------- Respondents ----------- 2 27.10.2010 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State as with regard to the following relief:- “1(A) To set aside letter No.-07 dated 8.5.2005, as contained in Annexure-1, issued under the joint signature of the Mukhia and the Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Kanjari, Beldor, Khagaria, so far the same relates to selection and appointment of respondent no.- 9 as Shiksha Mitra at Gram Panchayat Raj Kanjari, made on fake mark sheet. (B) For a direction upon the respondent authorities to select and appoint the petitioner as Shiksha Mitra at Gram Panchayat Raj Kanjari, in place of the respondent no.- 9 with all the 2 consequential benefits.” and taking into account that the post of Shiksha Mitra has already been abolished with effect from 1.7.2006, no direction can now be issued by this Court for the selection and appointment of the petitioner. Nonetheless, the grievance of the petitioner with regard to the alleged illegality in the selection and appointment of the respondent no.9 can still be gone into by the District Teachers Appellate Authority. That being so, if the petitioner would file a complaint to this effect before the concerned District Teachers Appellate Authority, the same shall be disposed of strictly in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as also the respondent no.9. With the aforementioned observations, this application is disposed of. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)