IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25040 of 2008 1. CHUNU SINGH @ CHUNU KUMAR 2. Chandan Singh @ Chandan Kumar Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 23.10.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners, who are younger brothers of the husband of the deceased, apprehending arrest in a Police case under Sections 304B of the Penal Code. The submission is that it is their elder brother who had made a demand for Motorcycle from his wife’s family. The allegations against the petitioners are generalized as exhorting him to ask for the Motorcycle. They have been implicated only because of their relationship with the husband of the deceased. Learned counsel for the State from the case diary fairly submits that though there are allegations against the petitioners but they are of generalized, up-till-now A supplementary affidavit filed today states that the petitioners are 20 and 18 years of age respectively. The consideration of their age with generalized allegations persuades this Court not to subject them to the rigours of custody on materials presently available, considering the environment to which they shall be exposed at this age. For that reason, let the petitioners, abovenamed surrender in the court below within a period of six weeks from 2 today, when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail during the period of investigation till submission of charge sheet on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M.,Vaishali at Hajipur in Hajipur Sadar P.S. case No. 442 of 2006, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)