6 \ l v ‘ \ ,J 1} 1 < t > x IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHA'ITISGARH / WRIT PETITION No. 2L0! OF 2004 ‘ TR IQNE PET adha Gupta, 'ag'ed about ’40 years, , W/o' 'Ravindra 'Guptar Tésident of_7/239, ,Baijn‘athpar'a, Raipur,Di‘st.Raipur (Chhattisg’arh) o r t ae ' po r. . r rao Co a c u na r r Ra Raip ''hair .s in c i a A R . State f Chhattisgah thrCugh he Secretary, Deprtmnt of Transrt,” D K S. Bhawan. Mantralaya,Raipu (Chhattisgarh) . The Tnsprt mmISSIoner RaVI Nagar RaJa Talb Ralpur' f Distrit Ralpr (Chhattusgarh) Regiol ’ Tansport Office} I.lpur Dlst ’ur (Chtts/gah) , Asistant? Regoal Transpbrt; Offier Raipur Distrct Raipuri' (Chhttisgarh) RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 27 F TH CONSTITUTION OF INDIA W 25/08/2004 ! Shn V1vek RanJan Tlwan /Aga Shn Sanjay S spondent] Sfate ' ‘ x 1 l IC J ( _ The mam gnevance of th that respondent No 3 lssued sh (A:nncxure P 1) and asked the E a penod of one week The pe v Wlthm the supulated hme, but i glvmg anv &1d1ng m the explan F roons1derat10n o i 7 :é8/06/2004 the reglsuauon c w . ' e petltloner m thJs wnt petmon ls ow cause notlce dated 28/ 06/ 2004’ .entloner to glve explanauon Wrrhmy tmoner submltted hls explanatlonf x till then respondent no 3 ls not: atlon and at the same hme beforet f the exp1a11a1 Jon Vlde unpugned order dated} f the vehlcle of thepehtloner was! also cancelled ut10ner submlts that at “the hme of I k o n“ aving heard the learne regard to the facts and cucums1 1s dJrected to pass an appropx after cons1der1ng the explana1 'w1t.h1n a penod of thntv days \,. x late order m accordance mth law 10n submltted by the pet1t10ner‘ counsel for the petltloner / ,V , H twal Panel Laywer for "thei ‘ , the partles > the gpetmoner, Wlthout g1vmg a j H d ’f :