IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1168 of 2009 Date of decision: 3.3.2009 Major Singh ...Petitioner Versus Mohinder Singh and others ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Anupam Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. S.D.ANAND, J. A plea raised by the defendant-petitioner Major Singh for the appointment of a Local Commissioner, to visit the property in suit and to report about the factual position available over there, was declined by the learned Trial Judge by observing that the request made had nothing, at all, to do with the adjudication of the controversy which pertained to the specific performance of impugned agreement dated 29.4.2005. I have heard Mr. Anupam Bhardwaj, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. I have also been through copies of the pleadings with the assistance of the learned counsel who produced the same for perusal by this Court. The view obtained by the learned Trial Court is in order. The present is pure and simple case wherein the plaintiffs/respondents has asked for a decree for possession, by way of specific performance of agreement dated 29.4.2005. Whatever may be the factual position at the spot, shall have no bearing on the adjudication of that controversy. The petition being denuded of merit is ordered to be dismissed in limine. March 03, 2009 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge