-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.214 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.214 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.214 OF 2007 IN IN IN CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION ST.NO.14152 OF 2007 REVISION APPLICATION ST.NO.14152 OF 2007 REVISION APPLICATION ST.NO.14152 OF 2007 AND AND AND CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.219 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.219 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.219 OF 2007 IN IN IN CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION ST.NO.14160 OF 2007 REVISION APPLICATION ST.NO.14160 OF 2007 REVISION APPLICATION ST.NO.14160 OF 2007 .............................................................. Office Notes,Office Office Notes,Office Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, memorandum of Coram, memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s appearances,Court’s appearances,Court’s Court’s Court’s Court’s or or or orders or directions orders or directions orders or directions Judge’s Judge’s Judge’s orders orders orders & Registrar’s orders. & Registrar’s orders. & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. ............................................................. ............................................................. Mr.M.C.Shah i/b Mr.Ajay Rao for the Applicant. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : JUNE 28,2007. : JUNE 28,2007. : JUNE 28,2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. These Applications were on board. When the Applications were called out in the morning session, the learned Counsel for the Applicant stated that he has given notice of the Application to the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. He has also served notice of the Application to the Advocate who is appearing for some of the Respondents in the Writ Petition which was earlier filed. He states that the Affidavit of service will be filed tomorrow i.e. on 29th June 2007. 2. In view of the averments made in the Applications, same deserve to be allowed in view of the order passed in the Writ Petitions. Accordingly, Applications are -2- allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE