1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.538/07 Badri Lal vs. Malvika Panwar & Ors. Date of order : 27/1/2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri R.M.S. Panwar for the petitioner. Shri N.A. Naqvi, AAG for the respondents. ****** Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and perused the reply submitted by the respondents, I find that the last candidate according to the respondents appointed in the selection process has secured 79.27% marks whereas the petitioner's marks are 53.30% only and moreover respondent states that there was no post lying vacant against the advertisement issued in 1996-97. In view of above, the petitioner has not been able to make out a case as the respondents have considered his case and found him not entitled and accordingly conveyed to the petitioner. No case is made out for contempt. The contempt petition is dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/