IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE Afl‘ BILASPUR (C.G_.) o5g W. N3 D/o Late 4 P Shri Vinay Kumar Gupta Aged ETITIONERS: r" LVeshweshwari Gupta , wor ‘ng as Asst. Q’ \pW“ v‘ ‘ 0‘ about Teacher, 35 vGovt. years Primary School, Sahaspur Sarangarh, R/o Babakuti Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). OF MANDAMUS AND CTIONS:— FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRE \Y ‘ RESPONDENTS: / 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary ,Public Education Department Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. District Education off1cer, Raigarh, DiSt~Raigarh. (C.G.) / 226 F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA O / ‘ " " \ k A HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILAsPUR w. P. (s) Na. 373 ar 2007 Pefi‘rioner Veshweshwari Gup'ra Versus Respondents : stafe of Chhaffisgnrh and another SB: Han'ble Mr. JUS‘rice sa‘rish K. Agniho'fri. J 5hri Harish Khuiia, Advocu'te for 1h: pefifioner. 5hri Arvind Dubey, Panel lawyer for The respondenfs/S'ro‘fe. 0 R D E R (Passed on 24*“ Day of January, 2007') The following order of 1'he Cour? is passrd by $afish K, Agnihofri, J. 1. Learned counsel qupeoring for fine pe'rifioner as well as learned Penal lawyer appearing for The responden'l’s/S'rafe jointly submi'i' 'l'ha‘r 'l'he facfs of 'rhe presenf case are similar 'ro flan-r of in W. P.(5) 5742 of 2006 (Madan singh Vs. Sfafe of Chha‘l’fisgarh 8i others), which was disposed of vide order damd 27*“ amber, 2006. They funk.» submif 'rha'r 'lhe quesl'ion of law involved is also The same. 2. In view of +he above-sfa'red submissions made by learned counsel for fhe parfies, ‘l'he wri-r pe'rifion is disposed of in farms of fhe order dam! 27*“ amber, 2006 passed by ms Cow-i in w. P.(5) 5742 of 2006 (Madan Singh Vse 51am of Chhaffisgarh & o'lhers). No order as fo costs. j Sd/- J i Satish K. Agnihotri f Judge Bablu i i i