IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.51719-M of 2007 Date of decision : 03-02-2009 Nirmal Singh and others ....Petitioners VERSUS State of Punjab and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Ms. R.K. Girdhar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Anter Singh Brar, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Hitesh Sood, Advocate, for Mrs. Anju Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed u/s 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.101 dated 25-8-2001 registered at Police Station City Faridkot under Sections 452/324/323/148/149 IPC. Prayer for quashing of the FIR has been made on the ground that compromise was arrived between the accused and the complainant. Compromise has been annexed as Annexure P-2. A perusal of Annexure P-2 reveal that complainant accepted Rs.1,50,000/- and Rs.50,000 more was paid to her which was kept on trust with Bikramjit Singh Brar, Advocate, Faridkot. Sh. Anter Singh Brar, counsel for the State has submitted that Rs.50,000/- was not paid and compromise was not effected. Complainant has appeared in the Court and has testified against the petitioners. Once trial has proceeded what is the effect of the testimony of the complainant Crl. Misc. No.51719-M of 2007 -2- and the compromise are entirely in the realm of appreciation of the trial Court. Petitioner is at liberty to raise all arguments before the trial Court at appropriate stage. Petition is disposed of. (KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA) 3-2-2009 JUDGE manju