CLMA 7882/2009 with WPCRL 781/2009 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, ACJ Heard Sri K.S. Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.A. and perused the record. The petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the FIR dated 18-8-2009 lodged by respondent No.3 at P.S. Kotwali Nagar District Haridwar U/Ss 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 I.P.C. as well as a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to arrest the petitioner till the pendency of the presence writ. The complainant has made specific allegations against the petitioner in the F.I.R. I am not supposed to embark upon an enquiry about the reliability of the allegations made in the FIR at this stage. The evidence is still to come and any judgment to be given by this court would amount to pretrial. I do not find any substance in this petition and the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly the petition is dismissed in limine. However, if the petitioner appears before the learned Magistrate concerned in order to obtain his bail, then the learned Magistrate shall dispose of his bail application expeditiously without causing any unreasonable delay. Dated: 10-9-2009 (B.C. Kandpal, ACJ) ISB