IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10444 of 2010 1. SANJAY KUMAR SINGH, S/O SRI SHIV NATH SINGH, R/O 265, CIVIL LINES, NEAR HEAD POST OFFICE, P.S. KOTWALI, TOWN + DISTRICT- AZAMGARH (U.P.). Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE HOME COMMISSIONER, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY, HOME (POLICE) DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 4. THE DIRECTOR (PROSECUTION), BIHAR, PATNA. 5. INCHARGE, PERSONAL CLAIMS SETTLEMENT WING, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, BIHAR, PATNA. 6. THE COLLECTOR CUM DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, WEST CHAMPARAN AT BETTIAH. 7. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR, ESTABLISHMENT WING, WEST CHAMPARAN AT BETTIAH. 8. DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, WEST CHAMPARAN AT BETTIAH. 9. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. 10. THE HOME COMMISSIONER, JHARKHAND, RANCHI 11. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, JHARKHAND, RANCHI 12. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR, (LEGAL SECTION), RANCHI. 13. DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, RANCHI. FOR STATE OF JHARKHAND: N.N.OJHA FOR THE STATE OF BIHAR :YOGENDRA KUMAR SIGH A.C. TO S.C. 21 FOR PETITIONER: MS.PUSHKAR NARAIN SHAHI& DHANANJAY KUMAR SHAHI. ----------- 2. 11.05.2011 Petitioner’s grievance in this writ application is confined to payment of his monetary benefits and other service benefits for the period from 14.09.1990 to 14.11.1998 during which he was in the service of the State of Bihar, and for a direction that his service details may be sent to the State of U.P. for being 2 added to his service being rendered in the State of U.P. Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State of Bihar submit that after filing of this writ application a sum of Rs.78, 286/- towards G.P.F. dues has been paid to the petitioner, which as per submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, he has received under protest as the interest has not been calculated on the amount. In respect of other grievances of the petitioner, learned counsel for the State submits that he has no instructions. The writ application was filed on 06.07.2010 with service of two copies of the same in the office of learned Advocate General. However, till today no counter affidavit has been filed in the case. In the circumstances, petitioner is directed to file a detailed representation before the Director (Prosecution) within four weeks from today giving details of his dues and entitlements for the period he served under the Directorate as Assistant Public Prosecutor. In the representation, he shall also request 3 that his service record may be sent to the State of U.P. immediately. The representation of the petitioner, if filed, shall be considered and appropriate orders shall be passed on the same in accordance with law, item- wise, by the Director of Prosecution positively within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. The writ application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions. Nitesh (Jayanandan Singh, J.)