1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10865 OF 2004 Krishna Jayram Parab & Ors. .. Petitioners. Vs. Anant Pundlik Parab & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.N.V.Bandiwadekar for the petitioners. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 29TH AUGUST, 2006 DATED : 29TH AUGUST, 2006 DATED : 29TH AUGUST, 2006 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. The petitioners have impugned the order dated 2.1.2002 by which their Darkhast petition has been dismissed holding that the petitioners have failed to show that on 8.10.1997 they were entitled to share in the management of the temple and, therefore, no action could be taken against the opponents as requested in the Darkhast proceedings. For the reasons stated in the impugned order I see no reason to exercise the writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)