IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.245 of 2011 MADHU MOHAN KUMAR S/O- JAGDISH PRASAD YADAV @ JAGDISH YADAV, R/O- VILLAGE- MATHAR, P.S.- MUFFASIL, DISTRICT- KHAGARIA. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR For the petitioner : Mr. Binod Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Anita Kumari Singh, APP ----------- 3 12.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. Petitioner has been declared juvenile in conflict with law. He is in Remand Home in connection with a case instituted under Sections 20 and 22 of N.D.P.S. Act with an allegation that he was found possessed with 1 ½ kg. of Ganja. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this is the first criminal charge the petitioner is facing. It is submitted that the amount of Ganja allegedly recovered from the possession of the petitioner is close to small quantity. It is submitted that he is in custody/Remand Home since 6th September, 2010. The father of the petitioner has affirmed the affidavit filed in support of the bail application. He has taken on himself full responsibility respecting the petitioner, if released on bail. A report from the concerned Probation Officer was called for which is placed at Flag-A. It appears therefrom that on verification, nothing unusual was found by the Probation Officer with the petitioner and/or his family members. The Probation Officer has recommended his release subject to 2 supervision of the parents. Having heard the parties, this Court, while setting aside the orders impugned, directs release of the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Juvenile Justice Board, Munger in connection with G.R. Case No. 1588 of 2010 (arising out of Kotwali P.S. Case No. 370 of 2010) subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors shall be father of the petitioner. It shall be the sole responsibility of the bailor (father) to monitor conduct and behaviour of the petitioner and to produce him before the Court in person as and when directed therefor. In case of default in such appearance, the Court below shall have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (ii) During the subsistency of the present privilege of bail, if it is found that the petitioner is found involved in any other criminal case, the same shall be treated as a breach of condition of bail entailing cancellation. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J)