i^aw^ M!Wii? E-l; Ifii ^ ^^' ^it's^^s^is^i/i:j^^;:^^jii^Bi Nw.clii^litii^ill^li^ :ii?^siiviiii!!ffl^NiHy^i5^'iii^,'^ lcoR^^iHitiiiE|iiiiiii.i^iiiK|G^^ 8» 1^'Bi.E^I-lllD.R^IN^K^^^ C%n emi?tPetitionNo..9^ PET!TI©NER .;Knshnakai'r;<?Qrat|i|^^iy:l.^|Nirr^ '<|oraj<ij^e|36,||^j@|j:^|©a^|^d^ Rnmary^hQQl.BJIa^pulp.G.) VERSUS RESjPONDENT ^ho|;|^rawal|^,^^^si||oiE^ .'•^rawal.ga^^^jjDiffejjt^ 'lnyrastruc^jre.ilBrjyate,^^:,^ ^BF^:,^^]Flbor,^l|aJiy^'F>laza:,'|Bi^^ .:(C.G^i'.-',.,.'',l:<:v':^!^ Present: ShriAJiAsgar.leaniNcounselforthtel^titior^ iff^ililgig ^j|Pass^i||i||19ffl^une,| Thefono^^oralo^^ 'S.R.'1NAYAK,CJ'....-—;1;;;::-,,:?':':--':,11^ Thec^mplaintjnthiscontempt^^c^ petjtionerlorallptmentofshophaSbeehrejeGt^ stating the same reason which he had earlfer stated, ^ TOmplaJn^ that the jmpugn^ action of^^^^^^^^ tantamounttocontemptoytheCo ofthedemandv^notdecjded^^^^^^^^^^ proceeding. The Coyrt only^diret^d thelhird resp^^ theapplJcationc^tlwpetjtioneTfe^allQtmert^ jn accordance^vwth lavy, jf h^ pertod otthree w^l^fl^ t^ petitjon. the rejetrtion ttfthe^ :sassSi •^^ ^ ^SSi^ :s^ a 'S:t •MM ^^l 'as iai v'a .sm y - "L-- c4 respondent is not justified, it is open for the petitioner to assajl the validity of the same in an appropriate independent legal proceeding. That right is reserved to the petitioner. The contempt case is closed. No costs. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge ^^