IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12910 of 2010 FANTUS TIWARI @ FANTUS CHAURASIA @ FIRANGI CHAURASIA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------- 03. 01.07.2010 It is mentioned on behalf of the petitioner that in the order dated 26.05.2010, second alias name Firangi Chaurasia has wrongly been mentioned, whereas Firangi Chaurasia was father of the petitioner. On perusal of the record, it appears that at all the relevant places in the application petitioner appears to have been described as Fantus Tiwari @ Fantus Chaurasia @ Firangi Chaurasia, son of late Firangi Chaurasia. Moreover, the Vakalatnama attached with the application also bears attested L.T.I. of the petitioner showing the name Fantus Chaurasia @ Firangi Chaurasia and in the Vakalatnama also name of the petitioner appears to have been described as stated above with two alias names. Thus, I find no error in the description of the name of the petitioner in the order. Hence question of any rectification does not arise till step is taken for relevant correction of the error, if any, as pointed out. Rajeev/ (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)