IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1687 of 2009 SMT.LALMUNI KUMARI @ DEVI, wife of Sri Arjun Kumar, resident of village – Aslempur, PS Daud Nagar, District Aurangabad ……….. ……Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Director, Social Welfare, ICDS Department, Bihar, Patna 3. The District Magistrate, Aurangabad 4. The Chief Development Project Officer, Daud Nagar, Aurangabad 5. The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Daud Nagar, Aurangabad 6. The Chauri Gram Panchayat through its Secretary, Daud Nagar, Aurangabad 7. Smt. Manju Devi, the Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Chauri, Daud Nagar, Aurangabad 8. Smt. Rajmaniya Devi wife of Sri Sobha Ram, resident of village Sukhdeo Bigha,PS Daud Nagar, District Aurangabad ……….. …… Respondents ----------- 02- 3.2.2009 Heard Mr. D KTiwary for the petitioner, and Mr. Mukesh Kumar, learned AC to Govt. Advocate no.III. It relates to selection of Anganbari Sahayika. The learned government counsel raises a preliminary objection as to the maintainability of this writ petition, and submits that the petitioner has rushed to this Court without exhausting the statutory remedy of appeal available to her in terms of Section 11 of the Guidelines. In his submission, the appeal lies before the learned Divisional Commissioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she has found it difficult to prefer the appeal because of non-supply of the certified copy of the impugned order. 2. The writ petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to prefer her appeal before the appropriate authority which, if preferred within a period of six weeks from today, the same shall be considered on merits, and the delay in preferring the same shall not - 2 - come in her way. Respondent no.3 in his reply/counter affidavit shall ensure that copies of the relevant documents including the impugned order are annexed. ( S K Katriar ) mrl