IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICAITON NO.169 OF 2010 (ISHWAR CHANDRASHEKHAR SAWARKAR...VS.. STATE OF MAH. THR. PS KHAPA.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. L.B.Khergade, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. S.S.Doifode, A.P.P. for Respondent. CORAM : R.G.KETKAR, J. DATED : OCTOBER 12, 2010. The learned counsel for the applicant undertakes to file typed copy of the impugned judgment and order dated 26th August, 2010 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Criminal Appeal No.116 of 2006 within one week from today. The statement is accepted. This revision application challenges judgment and order dated 18th April, 2006 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Saoner in Regular Criminal Case No.397 of 2003 as also the judgment and order dated 25.08.2010 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Regular Criminal Appeal No.116 of 2006. By these judgments and orders, the Courts below convicted the applicant/ original accused for the offence punishable under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code and he was sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years and fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three more months. He was also convicted for the offence punishable under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year. ADMIT. Mr. S.S. Doifode, learned A.P.P. waives service on behalf of the respondent. Call for record and proceedings. CRI. APPLICATION NO. 254/2010. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By this application the applicant prays for suspension of sentence and for grant of bail. In paragraph 2 of the application it is asserted that the applicant paid the fine amount of Rs.1,000/- and he was also on bail during the trial. The learned counsel for the applicant further states that even during the pendency of the appeal the applicant was on bail. In view of this, the applicant shall be enlarged on the same bail but by executing fresh bonds. The application stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE RR.