CRLR No.130 of 2002 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Mr. U.P.S. Negi, Advocate for the revisionist. Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. On the previous dates, learned counsel for the revisionist was directed to furnish the correct address of respondent no.1, however, the order has not been complied with till today. Today, Mr. U.P.S. Negi, learned counsel for the revisionist has submitted that he is unable to trace the address of respondent no.1 and due to this reason he does not want to press his revision and therefore he prayed that the same may be dismissed as not pressed. Even otherwise, I have perused the judgment and order dated 12.11.2002 passed by Judge, Family Court, Pauri Garhwal and I do not find any illegality, incorrectness or impropriety in the impugned judgment and order. In view of the above, the revision is dismissed. (D.V.,J.) 07.10.2010 RG