WP(C) 5838/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Mr OP Sunar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms P Chakrabor ty, learned Standing Counsel, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Assam. The petitioner is aggrieved by her perceived inaction of the respondents in providing her with appointment as Anganwadi Helper in 3 No. Kasomari Anganwa di Centre under 2 No. Sootea Gaon Panchayat in the district of Sonitpur, Assam. According to her, though her name appears in the select list dated 18.8.2010 for Anganwadi Helper published on the culmination of the process relatable thereto, she has been denied her appointment without any justifiable reason. The parawise comments furnished to the learned Standing Counsel of the D epartment disclose that the Project Level Selection Committee having noticed tha t the petitioner’s sister Smt. Sanita Devi has been selected also, however, for the post of Anganwadi Worker in the same centre, comprehended that her appointme nt as well would be opposed to the spirit of the scheme involved. It, therefore, has forwarded the matter to the State Level Selection Committee for an appropri ate decision. Ms. Chakraborty submits that the matter for the time being rests with the State Level Selection Committee. Mr Sunar has submitted that the hesitation entertained by the Project Le vel Selection Committee is unfounded as there is no bar whatsoever in the appoin tment of the two family members in a particular Anganwadi Centre. Be that as it may, as the Project Level Selection Committee, as the para wise comments disclose, has in its wisdom considered it appropriate to refer the matter to the State Level Selection Committee for a decision as considered to b e essential and appropriate, this Court considers it expedient to close the inst ant proceeding by requiring it (State Level Selection Committee) to decide on th e claim of the petitioner for appointment as Anganwadi Helper in the aforementio ned Anganwadi Centre at the earliest. As the petitioner waits in expectation and as it has been submitted at t he Bar that the Project Level Selection Committee had forwarded the matter to th e State Level Selection Committee for its decision some time in the month of Sep tember, 2010, the exercise as pending should be completed within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. No costs.