n ^ ^z^^}- zfe/^/4 ?,......,....— Ft^eo""^i^^^;p<K(A^........ ,^ Sh?i..".^/"j—•'""""""{ ,.-,^cate <©ttre^^AJten-) M6Jb FX3C-<£ot ^•3',!?t^'«<-<'<" ft.tsA.H.A <^a- t^/^h^ 1 p^ A^AMENDED PETITION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR ^ (C.G.l WRIT PETITION No. 1488 /2005 PETITIONBR Smt. Sonu Gupta, Wife of Shri Deepak ia-tipta, Resident of B-l, A Block, Second Floor, Dhariwal Complex, Choubey Colony, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^r •^^ "Ml "^-t. ^(0^^^ ,^<O.^N ^^'€ ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Department of Home, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. Central Bureau of Investigation, Through The Superintendent of Police, 1st Floor, Carvas Building, Station Road, (Near Cat) Jabalpur (M.P.) 3. Union of India through the Secretary Department of Personnel Public Grievances, 112, North Block N.ew Delhi. WRIT PETITION UNDBR ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SEEKING THE ISSUANCES OF A WRIT/ORDER/DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS TRANSFERRING INVESTIGATION FROM RESPONDENT No.l TQ RESPONDENT No.2 SO AS TO ^ DISCLOSE THE NAME OF THE PERSON/PERSONS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REGISTRATION OF CASE FIR No.73/2002 DATED 6.10.2002, UNDER SECTION 498A & 34 OF IPC, P.S. MAHILA THANA, CHHATTISGARH PURPORTED MADE ON THE BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER THE WMT/ORDER/DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE REGISTRATION OF FIR AGAINST THE ACCUSED PERSONS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REGISTRATION OF CASE FIR No.73/2002 ON THE BASIS OF A FORGED, CONCOCTED AND FABRICATED COMPLAINT. aatm^.v^e^ss': C.OURT QF.CHHATTSSGARH AT BSLASPUR WRJT,PET3TIQN_Ng. 1488 Petrlioner 'Versus Respondents Bmt Sorsu Gupta of Chhattjsgarh & \.:. ^.' .-.J'- WRST PETITION UNDER ARTiCLE 226/227 OF THE CONS'ri'TUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hoifbie Mr. Satish K,. Agnihotri, J.) Eres^£li^ Sh^^ Rajeev Shrivastava, Advocate Shri Paii, Advocate for the petjtioner. Shri A.S. Kachhwaha, Deputy Advocate General with Shrl N»N»Roy, Panei Lawyer for the State. Ms/FouzJa Mirza, Asslstant Solicitor Generai for the Union of India. o.RDiB.l.QSAy (Passed on 24ih day of Jvne, 2010) 1. • Shri A,,S> Kachhwaha, tearned Deputy Advocate Genera'i appearing for the State, submits that. the enqulry report in dispu.te;woujd be provlded to the petitlonerwSthin a period of two weeRs. 2. • It is accordingty dlrected that respondent No. 1 shail ensure that a copy of the report In'respect of the commuhication 25/01/2005 (Annexure P/6), be providecr to :the pefltloner wlthin the aforestated specified time.' 3. in view of foregoing, Shri Shrivastava, ieaned counsel a.ppearing tbr the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want t.o press other reilefs 'at this Hov^ever, he liberty to lake appropriate steps thereafter, if cause of action survives or a new cause of action arises. : . • • 4. Accordingiy, the writ petition is dlsmlssed wtth the atorestated' SiDertv^ I Sd/- i SatishK.Agmhotri 1 Judge