IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. -M No. 22860 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 2.9.2011 Narinder Kumar .. Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana .. Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Premjit S. Hundal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Vermani, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. S.M. Sharma, Advocate for the complainant. Rajesh Bindal, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that mother-in-law and husband of the complainant were arrested and have been released on regular bail. The petitioner here-in is father-in-law. Learned counsels for the State as well as the complainant submitted that some of the jewellery is yet to be recovered. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, in my opinion, the petitioner is not required to be taken into custody merely for the purpose of recovery of jewellery which was allegedly given at the time of marriage as dowry or gift. It is also a fact that mother-in-law and husband had already been arrested and released on regular bail. Considering the aforesaid fact, interim bail granted to the petitioner on 29.7.2011 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. ( Rajesh Bindal ) 2.9.2011 Judge Meenu