IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.34/2007. Santosh Kumar Bhattacharya. VERSUS Shri Jwalaram. 13.05.2008. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.A.K.Pareek, for the appellant. Mr.G.K.Garg, for the respondent. ***** Heard learned counsel for the parties. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 17.05.2006 passed by the learned trial court by which the application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 C.P.C. for grant of temporary injunction, filed by the plaintiff- appellant, has been dismissed. During the course of hearing, it has been submitted by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent that since the respondent claims the property to belong to the temple and deity of Mataji situated in Amer. He does not claim title over the property in dispute. In that view of the matter, he submits that the respondent shall not alienate the property in any manner during the pendency of the suit. On the basis of the above submission, this appeal is accordingly disposed of recording the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the respondent. The appeal is accordingly disposed of. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.