IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN THURSDAY, THE 10TH APRIL 2008 / 21ST CHAITHRA 1930 WA.No. 899 of 2008() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.10440/2008 Dated 27/03/2008 .................... APPELLANTS: ----------- 1. JESSY MATHEW, WORKING AS LECTURER (SELECTION GRADE), ST.JOSEPH'S COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION FOR WOMEN, KOVILVATTOM ROAD, ERNAKULAM, RESIDING AT FLAT NO.5B, ELEGENT HEIGHTS, INDIRA NAGAR, KADAVANTHRA, KOCHI-20. 2. JOSE AUGUSTIN, WORKING AS PRINCIPAL, ST.JOSEPH'S TRAINING COLLEGE, MANNAM, KOTTAYAM, RESIDING AT NADAYTHOU, AMALAGIRI P.O., KOTTAYAM. 3. DR.PETER MATHEW, WORKING AS PRINCIPAL, MOUNT TABOR, TRAINING COLLEGE, PATHANAPURAM RESIDING AT KALLUMPURATHUKADAVIL. 4. ANNIE PAUL, WORKING AS PRINCIPAL, PEET MEMORIAL TRAINING COLLEGE, MAVELIKKARA RESIDING AT KOMMATTU FLAT 4D, VI PALACE, MAVELIKKARA. BY ADV. SRI.P.SREEKUMAR SRI.K.S.MANU (PUNUKKONNOOR) WA 899/08 -2- RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF SECONDARY AND HIGHER EDUCATION, MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 128C WING, SHASTRI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI. 3. THE UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION, BAHADURSHA ZAFAR MARG, NEW DELHI 110002, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 4. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM. 5. KERALA UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, SC, KERALA UTY. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & P.N.RAVINDRAN, JJ. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Writ Appeal No.899 of 2008 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Judgment Balakrishnan Nair, J. The point raised by the appellants is covered against them by the judgment in WA No.620/08. It is covered by several other decisions also. Therefore, we find nothing wrong with the decision of the learned single Judge. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR,JUDGE 10.04.2008 P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE sta 2