THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 8244 OF 2010 Dated 4th June, 2010 Between: P.Ravi Kiran …Petitioner And Additional Director General of Police and three others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri C.Raghu Counsel for respondents 1 to 3: G.P for Home The Court made the following ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.2 in rejecting the petitioner’s nomination for the post of Senior Vice President of the Andhra Pradesh State Police Officers’ Association State Executive Committee as illegal and arbitrary. I have heard Sri C.Raghu, learned counsel for the petitioner, and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing the respondents. In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is that his nomination was illegally rejected. By order dated 15.04.2010, this Court, while, prima facie, finding that the rejection of the petitioner’s nomination is not proper, directed respondent No.2 to accept the petitioner’s nomination which shall be subject to further orders to be passed in the writ petition. At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in pursuance of the direction given by this Court, the petitioner’s nomination has been accepted and the petitioner is permitted to contest the election, which was held on 18.04.2010. In view of the above fact, no further relief in the writ petition need be granted. As the petitioner is permitted to contest the election, respondents 1 to 3 shall be free to declare the result of the election. If respondent No.4 feels aggrieved by the result of the election, he shall be free to question the same before the appropriate forum. Subject to the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP Nos.10620 and 13489 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 4th June, 2010 vrn