mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLN NO.82 of 2008 Sanjay Laxman Patil .. Applicant versus Kamal Anil Keni & Anr. .. Respondents ... Mr.Ganesh Gole for the applicant. Mr.Shailesh Kantharia for respondent no.1. Mr.K.V. Saste APP for the State. CORAM : D.G.KARNIK, J DATED : 3rd March 2008 P.C.: 1. Heard. 2. learned counsel for the applicant and respondent no.2 hand in consent terms. Consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. 3. The applicant has been convicted for an offence punishable u/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on a complaint filed by the respondent no.2. Counsel for respondent no.2 states that the complainant has deposited sum of Rs.47,000/- in the trial court. The complainant has agreed to receive this amount and compound the offence. Complainant is also present in the court and is identified by her counsel. She states that she has compounded the offence and has filed the consent terms which bears her signature. She further states that the consent terms have been explained to her in Marathi by the interpreter and she has understood them and has voluntarily agreed for compounding. 4. In view of the fact that the original complainant has compounded the offence, the applicant is acquitted of the offence. The applicant be released forthwith unless required in any other offence. (D.G. KARNIK, J)