HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO C.R.P.No. 4883 of 2008 Date: 09-09-2010 Between: Molli Simhachalam and others …… Petitioners and Nambaru Gangathalli and others …. Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO C.R.P.No. 4883 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioners filed this Revision Petition, invoking Article 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking to assail the correctness of the order, dated 21-10-2008 in I.A.No.355 of 2008 in O.S.No.28 of 2004 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at Chodavaram, which is filed seeking to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to note down the physical features of the suit land as to the crops existing on it. The Court below, after contest, allowed the said Application through the impugned order appointing an Advocate Commissioner to verify the schedule property and note down the crops existing on it. Hence, the present Revision Petition. Heard both sides. The petitioners, who are the plaintiffs, filed the suit for injunction in 2004, whereas the present Application has been filed at the fag end only for noting down the crops existed in the suit land at that time. The impugned order itself was passed as long back as on 21-10-2005 and this Court granted interim suspension of the same through the order, dated 07-11-2008 in C.R.P.M.P.No.6464 of 2008 and therefore, having regard to the narrow exercise sought to be done by the Advocate commissioner and due to long lapse of time, nothing survives and there is absolutely no need to seek any verification of the schedule property at this stage, as rightly pointed by the learned counsel for the petitioners. Therefore, the impugned order is liable to be set aside. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed. The order in I.A.No.355 of 2008 before the Court below is set aside and consequently, the said I.A. stands dismissed. No order as to costs. _______________ B. PRAKASH RAO, J Date: 09-09-2010 YCR