1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.71 OF 2010 (Madhukar s/o Gangaram Kewat and another vs. The Special Land Acquisition Officer and another) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri R.N. Ghuge, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri N.S. Khubalkar, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent no.1. --------- CORAM : S.A.BOBDE AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 12, 2010 The petitioners have challenged the acquisition proceedings on two grounds. Firstly, according to the learned Counsel for the petitioners, the respondents had identified Survey No.51 for acquisition. However, they have wrongly proceeded to initiate acquisition in respect of Survey No.50. We see no material on record to substantiate this contention. Secondly, according to the learned Counsel for the petitioners, notification under 2 Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act is vitiated for want of proper publication. The ground is raised, vide (B) in the petition. We find the ground is extremely vague and does not specify what is not proper publication. We see no merit in the petition, which is accordingly dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE khj