HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.130 of 2011 Date : 07.02.2011 Between : Siddana Rami Reddy & another. …..Petitioners And Siddana Naramma. …..Respondent HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.130 of 2011 ORDER : This civil revision petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India, is filed, aggrieved by the order, dated 28.09.2010, passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Kovur, in I.A.No.12 of 2010 in A.S.No.15 of 2009. Respondent herein is the plaintiff in the aforesaid suit, which was filed for injunction simplicitor. The said suit was decreed, and aggrieved thereby, the petitioners herein have filed First Appeal in A.S.No.15 of 2009. On the ground that afterwards the suit schedule property was sold to a third party, the petitioners herein have filed the application in I.A.No.12 of 2010, seeking for amendment of the written statement. The Court below has rejected the said application by impugned order. Hence, this revision petition. It is the case of the petitioners that in view of the fact that the property was already sold, the Court below ought to have allowed the application filed under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, for amendment of written statement. In this case, it is to be noticed that the suit was filed for injunction simpliciter. The only question, which falls for consideration in the suit was, as to who was in possession of the suit schedule property, on the date of filing of the suit, and hence, there is no reason at all for seeking the amendment. This Court is in agreement with the reasons assigned by the Court below while rejecting the application for amendment. For the aforesaid reasons, this revision petition is devoid of merit and it is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 7th February 2011 ajr