IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 581 of 2010 with CWPs No. 582, 583, 584, 587, 588 and 589 of 2010 . Decided on: March 11, 2010 For title: Please see below. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista, Advocate for the petitioners in all the Writ Petitions. For the Respondents: Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1 in all the Writ Petitions. Mr. Rakesh Chandel, Advocate for respondent No.2 in all the Writ Petitions. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) 1. CWP No. 581 of 2010 Akash Fruit Company ……..Petitioner Versus H.P. Agriculture Produce Marketing Board and others …….Respondents. 2 CWP No. 582 of 2010 Sunil Kumar ……..Petitioner Versus H.P. Agriculture Produce Marketing Board and others …….Respondents. 3. CWP No. 583 of 2010 V.K. Fruit Company ……..Petitioner 2 Versus H.P. Agriculture Produce Marketing Board and others …….Respondents. 4. CWP No. 584 of 2010 Vijay Kumar ……..Petitioner Versus H.P. Agriculture Produce Marketing Board and others …….Respondents. 5. CWP No. 587 of 2010 Ravinder Kumar Gupta ……..Petitioner Versus H.P. Agriculture Produce Marketing Board and others …….Respondents. 6. CWP No. 588 of 2010 Joginder Kumar ……..Petitioner Versus H.P. Agriculture Produce Marketing Board and others …….Respondents. 7. CWP No. 589 of 2010 Vikas Fruit Company ……..Petitioner Versus H.P. Agriculture Produce Marketing Board and others …….Respondents. Since common question of law and fact is involved in these Writ Petitions, they are being disposed of by a common judgment. The petitioners approached this Court with certain grievances for allotment of shops on lease in the newly constructed fruit and vegetable market, Palampur. It is the stand of respondents No. 1 and 2 in the reply that the applications of the petitioners are under consideration and appropriate decision will be taken in the light of 3 the allotment policy expeditiously. Therefore, these Writ Petitions are dispose of , making it clear that in case on account of such consideration, the petitioners are found eligible as per the allotment policy, the allotment shall be made without delay. The needful shall be done within a month from the date of production of a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the Writ Petition. All the Writ Petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. March 11, 2010 (Justice R.B. Misra), (rks) Judge.