*1* nms.3380.10.s.3031.10.909 kps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.3031 OF 2010 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3380 OF 2010 Rajan Kumar Singh. ..Plaintiff -Versus- Daulat G. Thakur and others. ..Defendants .......... Mr.S.S.Lanke, for the Plaintiff. Mr.A.H.Nagi, for the Defendant No.1. Mr.R.M.Upadhyay, for the Defendant No.3. .......... CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 16th December, 2010. P.C. 1 Both sides state that the consent terms which are executed after mutual discussion be taken on record as they resolve the dispute amicably in relation to the rights in the film “Kurukshetra” for the territories namely Bihar and Jharkhand states. 2 In these circumstances, the consent terms duly signed by the Plaintiff and the contesting Defendant Nos.1 and 3 are taken on record. The Defendant No.3 has no objection to the order being made in terms of the consent terms. The Defendant No.2 is Laboratory and a formal party but confirms receipt of the money. No relief is claimed against the Defendant No.4, therefore, the suit is dismissed as against the Defendant No.4. 3 The consent terms are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. There will be a decree in terms of the consent terms. *2* nms.3380.10.s.3031.10.909 4 The Notice of Motion does not survive in the light of disposal of the suit and is also disposed of. Ad-interim order, if any, to stand vacated. (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J)