1 AO-684-11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 684 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 917 OF 2011 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. OF 2011 IN B.C.C.C. (Dindoshi) L.C.Suit No.1244 of 2011 M/s. Sainath Refreshment ... Appellant (Orig. Plaintiff) Vs. Municipal Corporatin of Gr.Mumbai. Respondent (Oig. Defendant) Mr. Mohan B. Jadhav,Advocate, for the appellant Mrs.K.K.Soraan,Advocate for the respondent - MCGM. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 4th July, 2011. P.C. 1. Appeal is preferred against the refusal of ad-interim injunction pending the Notice of Motion. Reply to the Notice of Motion has not been so far filed. Prima facie, it appears that the ground floor of the structure is protected but the dispute is about the first floor. Taking into consideration the material on record, in my opinion, it will be in the interest of justice to dispose of the Appeal and the Application with following directions : 2 AO-684-11.sxw Respondent shall file reply and/or written statement within six weeks before the trial Court and the trial Court shall dispose of the Notice of Motion within six weeks thereafter. Till the disposal of the Notice of Motion, parties shall maintain status quo. Appeal and the Application stand disposed of accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)