— -3- medteal report of the complainant, at best the pffenc? under Sei^ion 324 IPC is macle out. 6. On the other hand, leamed rounsel for |hie Slate/r^psirri^ supporte the impugned jydgmert and (^>RP^^ |(^ ,js»gim^^ advanced by team^t^HS^Jwt^ ap(»)tew^s6K»Msed^^^^^ submitted by leamed counset for thf Start^sspondent 'thgt iothe incident the injured had syffered as many as10 JiiMn^ and^^^ theappellants/accusedh9 beenrigWy<^^ the Court below for the offence under SecUons 307^4 IPC. 7. I have heard leamed counset fbr the parti^ ^nd peaiised the record as also the impygned jt^ment v^h utftnTOSt^reiuw^^ As perthestatementofl.axmiPrgsadK^^ when he was at home and haying his fwd at hB residence, accysed Rajesh Kumartook him tofield on the pr^®dthatthefiel(ts,|irebelng demarcated by thie Patwm ^ hence hls presenc^ re rsciuired. It is further alleged ftat wrtienhe reachedjhefietd, ^ Kumar and Vijay Nara^n were already presert thiere OT^ dispute cropped yp between the cpmplatnant and the appellants/accM^ regarxljngthe Paty^ ma^ Par^ipttam hekl him from behind, appeltenttecRused yijgy N,|r^yans^^ on his leg with pK^xe (Kiw^. appi^nt^cxajs^ Rgji^ t^imar on his right thigh and both harwte with axe and app^nt/apcysal Anil Kumar on his head and back with battle-axe (TajbfcaO, Ht lodgjid the F.I.R. (ExP^ ard he wi®referred to Dis^Hwp^ ^ fbr his medteal examinati<m where he was h(»sptolizedandexamined. Dr. VBJoppo (P.W.^),who hadexamlned the cpmplainatrtLaxmiPra^^