IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43521 of 2009 NAGENDRA KUMAR @ BIHARIYA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 07.12.2009 Heard. The case has been registered under sections 457, 480 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code. Initially no F.I.R. was lodged and it appears that some of the villagers searched the house of the petitioner and produced some cash and certain ornaments of gold and silver, said to be found by them from the house of the petitioner. The petitioner’s case is that nothing was recovered from the house of the petitioner and as such the case is of false implication after hatching up the story of such a recovery on account of differences between the petitioner and others of his village. It was further contended that there is no reason why in spite of theft having taken place on 06.09.2009, no report was made to the police. Be that as it may, considering that the petitioner is in custody in the light of the plea taken by the informant, let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs. 5,000/- ( Rs.five thousand-) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in Mufassil P.S. Case No. 154 of 2009. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J ) BTiwary/