1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.2706 OF 2005 Smt.Yashodhara Bolar & Anr. : Petitioners V/s. Voltas Limited & Ors. : Respondents ... Mr.Bhavesh Parmar for the petitioners. Mr.C.U.Singh with Ms Sonali Kanekar i/b. Haresh Mehta & Co., for respondent nos.1 & 2. ... CORAM : S.A. BOBDE, J. June 8, 2005. P.C.: 1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr.Singh, learned counsel, appears and waives service of rule on behalf of respondent nos.1 and 2. Heard by consent. 2. The petitioners have challenged the refusal of interim relief in a complaint made by them regarding an allegedly illegal transfer. 3. Petitioner no.1 , who was working as a Clerk grade ‘B’ 2 at Mumbai Branch of the respondent-company, has been transferred vide order dated 30.7.2004 in the same capacity to CABD-F & C at Bhandup with effect from 2.8.2004. 4. The main grievance on behalf of the petitioners urged by Mr.Parmar, learned counsel, is that petitioner no.1’s conditions of service are being altered as a result of the transfer and, therefore, the transfer is mala fide. Mr.Singh, learned counsel for respondent nos.1 and 2, states that petitioner no.1’s conditions of service would not be altered to her prejudice as a result of the transfer and that she would be given the duties of a Clerk as observed by the learned Industrial Court. In this view of the matter, there is no reason to interfere. The learned Industrial Court is requested to expeditiously dispose of the complaint. 5. Accordingly, the rule stands discharged Sd/- S.A. BOBDE, J.