IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN FRIDAY, THE 15TH JULY 2011 / 24TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 19201 of 2011(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. DELISHYA MATHEW, AGED 22 YEARS, D/O.MATHAI A.V., EDATHIL HOUSE, NECHIPUZHOOR P.O., PALA, KOTTAYAM, PIN-686574. 2. ARUN KRISHNAN, AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.UNNIKRISHNAN A.C., "KARTHIK" HOUSE, KABANIGIRI P.O., PULPALLY VIA, WAYANAD, PIN-673579. BY ADV. SRI.R.MURALEEDHARAN PILLAI SRI.P.V.LONACHAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REGISTRAR, COCHIN UNIVERSITY, CUSAT P.O., KOCHI-682022. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, COCHIN UNIVERSITY, CUSAT P.O., KOCHI-682022. 3. THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, COCHIN UNIVERSITY, CUSAT P.O., KOCHI-682022. BY SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAI, SC FOR CUSAT. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.(C) No.19201 of 2011 EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST PETITIONER'S MARK LIST. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE SECOND PETITIONER'S MARK LIST. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REVALUATION FEE RECEIPT OF THE FIRST PETITIONER. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE REVALUATION FEE RECEIPT OF THE SECOND PETITIONER. EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE OFFER LETTER ISSUED BY THE TATA CONSULTANCY LTD. EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE OFFER LETTER ISSUED BY THE MIND TREE LTD. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. P.N. RAVINDRAN, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.19201 of 2011 ------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioners underwent the B.Tech. degree course in Electronics and Communication Engineering from Model Engineering College, Ernakulam, a college affiliated to the Cochin University of Science and Technology. The first petitioner failed in the paper “Computer Communication and Networks” and the second petitioner failed in the paper “Industrial Organisation & Management” of the VII semester examination for which they appeared in November, 2010. They have therefore applied for revaluation of their answer scripts by submitting separate applications on 25.5.2011 and 23.5.2011 respectively. The petitioners state that they have completed the course of study, that they have passed all other semester examinations including the VIII semester, that they had done well in the examination and if their answer scripts are revalued, they are sure to secure a pass in the said subjects. It is stated that the petitioners have also been selected and offered employment in TATA Consultancy Ltd. and Mind Tree Ltd. Bangalore, respectively. In such circumstances, unless their answer scripts are expeditiously revalued, they will be put to serious prejudice. In this writ petition they seek a W.P.(C) No.19201 of 2011 2 direction to the respondents to expeditiously revalue their answer scripts and to publish the results. 2. Sri.S.P.Aravindakshan Pillai, learned standing counsel appearing for the Cochin University of Science and Technology submitted that if the petitioners' applications for revaluation are in order and the requisite fee has been paid, the University will take steps to expeditiously revalue their answer scripts and communicate the result to them, within six weeks from today. In the light of the said submission and having regard to the fact that the petitioners have completed their course of study and have also been offered employment, I dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents to take steps to have the answer scripts of the petitioners revalued and to publish the results expeditiously and in any event within six weeks from the date on which the petitioners produce a certified copy of this judgment before the respondents. P.N. RAVINDRAN, JUDGE. nj.