IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19039 of 2010 SUKH RAM MANDAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 26.05.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make correction in the prayer portion. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail since 01.12.2009 in a case registered under sections 379, 307 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. It is alleged in the F.I.R. that fourteen persons, including the petitioner have assaulted the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that though the allegation of assault is against several persons but only three injuries have been found by the doctor which is apparent from the injury report, as contained in Annexure-2. Moreover, the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that other similarly situated accused persons, like Dhanik Lal Yadav, Ramdeo Yadav and others and Umesh Yadav & others have been granted bail by this Court which gets reflected from the computer section report, enclosed with the file. It is submitted by Mr. Dasarath Mehta, learned Addl. P.P. for the State that injury no.1 is grievous though - 2 - there is no specific allegation against the petitioner. Considering the omnibus and general allegation against several persons and the bail granted to the similarly situated other accused persons as well as the period under custody, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court II, Madhubani in Laukahi ( Andhra Math) P.S. Case No. 18 of 2008/ S.T. No. 143 of 2010. Let the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court II, Madhubani make verification with regard to the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that he is involved in any other case, then the bail bond of the petitioner will not be accepted. Further, if the petitioner fails to appear on three consecutive dates, then the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) BTiwary/