IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14468 of 2011 LILAWATI DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. ----------- 2. 27.04.2011. Though the application for cancellation of anticipatory bail of opposite party no.2 has been filed who was granted anticipatory bail on 25.02.2011 in connection with Shakurabad P.S. Case No. 91 of 2010 pending in the court of the learned C.J.M., Jehanabad, registered under Sections 341, 302/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. But now Mr. Sanjeev Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer only to the extent that the opposite party no.2 may be directed to appear before the trial court on day to day basis and the trial court may be directed to expedite the trial. It goes without saying that the accused has to appear during trial on regular basis. Any default for three consecutive occasions will give liberty to the learned trial court to cancel the anticipatory bail 2 of the petitioner. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial. Let the learned counsel for the petitioner serve a copy of this order to the counsel who appeared on behalf of the opposite party no. 2 during the anticipatory bail application and file the service report before this court within a period of two weeks from today. With this observation, this application is disposed off. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)