IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.722 of 2009 CHANDRAMANI PRASAD Versus SUNITA KUMARI ----------- 2/ 14.05.2009 Heard counsel for the parties. After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the order impugned, the court is not inclined to modify it any bit, specially when the order is interim in nature. However, I direct the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna to take up the hearing of the petition filed under section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act in Matrimonial Case no. 20 of 1998 by holding an enquiry on it in which the evidence of the parties have to be taken and dispose of the same within four months of the receipt/production of a copy of the present order. It is found that the case was filed in the year 1998 and it is about 11 years old. Disputes in the matrimonial matters are always to be treated as most urgent and in that view of the matter, I direct that the suit must also be disposed of within six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. With the aforementioned observation/direction, Civil Revision petition is disposed of. Anil/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)