:1: :1: :1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1001 OF 2007 (FOR BAIL) IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 814 OF 2007 Bhima Tukaram Porje ...Appellant Versus The State of Maharashtra and anr. ....Respondents Mr.P.P.Runwal Adv. for the appellants. Mr.A.T.Zaveri, Adv. for the respondents. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 10th January, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. The Appeal is admitted. The application is for bail. The conviction is under Section 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. 2. It is not disputed that the applicant was enlarged :2: :2: :2: on bail during the course of trial. The contents of the Application are not denied. In such circumstances, the applicant is enlarged on bail during the pendency of the Appeal. However, he will have to comply with the same terms and conditions but furnish fresh bonds. In addition, the applicant shall report once in a month to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Tanna House, Woodhouse Road, Mumbai-400 039. sd/- *******