1 Farad Continuation Sheet No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRI.APPLICATION NO.60 OF 2009 IN CRI.APPEAL NO.6 OF 2009 (DEORAO NARAYAN TARPE. Vs. STATE OF MAH.THR. PSO PULGAON.) ________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ Shri M.B.Naidu, Advocate for Appellant. Shri O.D.Kakade, A.P.P. for Respondent. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : JANUARY 20, 2009. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The applicant was on bail throughout the trial. He has been convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 326 and 324 of the Penal Code and has been sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years and three years, respectively. The learned trial Judge has observed that the accused committed the 2 offence in the heat of passion as the victim picked up quarrel on the alleged excessive charges of hotel bill after consuming food there. 3. In these circumstances, since the applicant is stated to be suffering from bronchitis, the substantive sentence is suspended on applicant's executing P.R.B. in Rs. Twenty Five Thousand with solvent surety in the like sum. The application is disposed of accordingly. 4. Hamdast allowed. JUDGE RR.