IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.9829 of 2008. Decided on: 17.12.2010. Lalu Ram and others. ……….Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1No For the petitioners : Mr. Tarlok Chauhan,Advocate. For the respondents : Mr.P.M.Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P.Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) The case of the petitioners, in a nutshell, is that they are entitled to the same relief which was granted vide award dated 28th December, 1990. The petitioners have not made any representation to the competent authority. Accordingly, the petitioners are permitted to make the representation to the second respondent for redressal of their grievances on the basis of the award dated 28th December, 1990, within a period of three weeks from today. Thereafter, the second respondent shall decide the same in view of the findings recorded by the Labour Court. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s),if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 17, 2010. (krt) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?. No