IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19659 of 2011 Navin Giri, S/O-Shashi Ranjan Giri Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02 13.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Allegedly, the victim was kidnapped by petitioner on 06.07.2010 and admittedly, the first information report was lodged on 10.07.2010. It appears from perusal of the impugned order of learned Sessions Judge that the victim has already returned to her home and her statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. has been recorded. The victim states in her statement that she was taken away by the petitioner and she was confined in a room at Delhi where petitioner forcibly established sexual relationship with her but any how she eluded from the clutches of the petitioner and alone came at Motihari and after that informed her parents. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that, as a matter of fact, it is a case of love affair and when victim returned to her home she was pressurized by her parents to make false statement before the Court. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties coupled with period of detention of the petitioner in jail custody, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur West in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No. 206 of 2010. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)