IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 8TH DECEMBER 2011 / 17TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 32776 of 2011(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- LIJEESH LAKSHMANAN, PANIKKESSERY (H), P.O KAVEED, THRISSUR- 680 505. BY ADV. SRI.V.JOHN MANI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O, KERALA- 673635. 2. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY PO, KERALA- 673 635 SC SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 32776 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P1TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DTD. 02.12.2011 EXT.P2TRUE COPY OF HTE RECEIPT EVIDENCING PAYMENT OF THE NECESSARY FEE FOR REVALUING THE PETITIONER'S ANSWER SHEETS DTD. 02/12/2011. /true copy/ P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).32776/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 8th day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioner applied for revaluation of the subject 'Analog and digital communication' (Paper code EE04 501), covered by Ext.P1 application and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. 4. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs