IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYNA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 5318 of 2010 Date of decision: 4.3.2010 Sandip Singh and another Petitioner vs. State of Punjab Respondent Present: Mr. OP Kamboj, Advocate Mr. Arshvinder Singh, DAG, Pb M.M.S.BEDI,J. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a case, registered at the instance of complainant Paramjit Singh alleging that the petitioners along with Mandip Singh and othera attacked the complainant, armed with different weapons. So far as petitioner No.1 is concerned, he is alleged to have hit Ranga with a dang on the back side of his chest, whereas petitioner No.2 has been attributed injuries on the right arm and back of Ranga with a base ball bat. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is a cross version case and that Tarsem Singh on the side of accused had received a grievous injury at the hands of complainant party and that the matter has been compromised. Since the petitioners have caused injuries on the person of Ranga along with Mandip Singh, who has caused a grievous injury with a gandsa on the person of Paramjit Singh complainant, it will be premature to form an opinion that they did not share common intention with their co- accused. The story of cross version cannot be treated as beneficial to the petitioners at this stage. The factum of matter having been compromised can be seen for the purpose of grant of regular bail. No extra ordinary exceptional circumstances exist for the grant of pre-arrest bail. Dismissed. March 4 ,2010 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE