1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.30 OF 2006 IN APPEAL (L) NO.1320 OF 2005 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.441 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO.4913 OF 2000 Majid Oomerbhoy .. Appellant v/s. Rashid Sattar Oomerbhoy & others. .. Respondents Ms.Chandra Sonpal i/by M/s.Thakore Jariwala and Associates for the appellant. Mr.Sanjay Jain with Ms.Deepa Mani i/by M/s.S.K.Srivastava & Co. for the respondent No.1. Mr.Rajiv Narula i/by M/s.J. Narula & Associates for the respondent No.6. CORAM : R.M.LODHA AND ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : 23RD JANUARY, 2006 P.C. Heard. 2. There is delay of 17 days in filing the appeal. 3. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the notice of motion, we are satisfied that the delay is sufficiently explained. 2 4. We, accordingly, condone the delay in filing the appeal. 5. Office is directed to process the appeal and post it for admission as soon as numbered. (R.M.LODHA, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)