IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1995 of 2009 ANGAD PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 10.2.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner as with regard to site selection in the matter of land acquisition for construction of Canal cannot be made subject matter of judicial review in a writ petition. It is for the authority to take a decision as to which area would be most suitable for construction of the Canal. Admittedly the land acquisition proceeding was initiated way back in the year 2005 under section 4 which followed by the declaration under section 6 and the notice to the petitioner under section 9 in the year 2006 itself. Thereafter the petitioner has been called upon to collect the amount of compensation under section 12(2) of the Land Acquisition Act and at this belated stage the petitioner cannot be allowed to question the initiation of land acquisition proceeding as was held by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Keshav Pal & 2 ors. Vs. State of Bihar & ors., reported in AIR 1985 Patna 70. That being so, this application is wholly misconceived and is accordingly dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/