IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO. 21 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 153 OF 2002 SHRIMATI SHRIPAD PRABHU DINDIBAGKAR AND ORS. ... Applicant Versus LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND ANR. ... Respondent Mr. Sudesh Usgaonkar, Advocate for the applicants. Ms. S. Linhares, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 29th September, 2011 P.C.:- Heard Mr. Usgaonkar, learned Counsel for the applicants and Ms. Linhares, learned Addl. Govt. Advocate for the respondents. 2. It is the case of the applicants that certain inadvertent errors have crept up in the common judgment dated 29th July, 2011 passed by this Court in First Appeals No.153/2002 and 154/2002. This position has not been disputed by the learned Addl. Govt. Advocate. 3. In view of the above, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (i), (ii) and (iii). It is made clear that prayer (iii) is granted subject to applicants filing an application for certified copy of the orders. A. P. LAVANDE, J. ssm.