1 cra86 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.86 OF 2010 M/s.Taj Enterprises & Others ...Applicants vs. Parekh Paper Agencies Pvt.Ltd. ...Respondent Mr.Sandeep Bhagat for the applicants None for the respondent CORAM : A.S.OKA,J. DATE : FEBRUARY 8,2011 P.C.: 1 Heard learned counsel for the applicants who are the original defendants. At the instance of the applicants, preliminary issue was raised as regards the pecuniary jurisidiction of the trial Court to entertain and try the suit filed by the respondent. The issue has been answered against the applicants. 2 After having heard the learned counsel for the applicants, I find that the view taken by the trial Court that the suit will be governed by section 6 (iv) (j) of the Bombay Court Fees Act,1959 appears to be correct. The suit is simplicitor for injunction for protection of the alleged possession of the respondent without following due process of law. There is no error in the impugned order. Revision application is rejected. JUDGE