IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.5879 of 2011 1. Rama Jee Yadav son of Sri Babulal Yadav, 2. Sadhu Yadav son of Sri Babulal Yadav, 3. Baj Nath Yadav son of Sri Rudal Yadav, 4. Dhrub Yadav son of Sri Rudal Yadav & 5. Satya Narayan Yadav son of Sri Ganga Yadav. Versus The State Of Bihar With Cr. Misc. No. 6759 of 2011 Wokil Yadav son of Mulkhlal Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 4/ 11.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners was refused bail by order dated 11.08.2010 and now they have renewed their prayer on the ground that they are in custody since April, 2010 and till now out of twelve witnesses only four have been examined. Further submission is that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents and undertake to be physically present on each date of the trial and shall not attempt to tamper with the evidence. Considering the same, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj, in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case No.45 of 2010, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to 2 the court about any change in the address of the petitioners, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not accused in any other case and, if they are, they shall not be released on bail, (iii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse,(iv) that the petitioners shall physically present on each date of the trial and if they do not do so, on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, their bail shall automatically be cancelled. If at any stage of trial, it is found that the petitioners are attempting to tamper with the prosecution witnesses, their bail shall be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)