THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO.1890 OF 2002 7th February 2006 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent is against the Order dated 27.09.2001 in W.P.No.24233 of 1999 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Tirupati, rep. by its Executive Officer and four others. Appellants/Respondents. And Sri V. Rajendra, S/o Venkatarayulu, Aged 28 years, Sanitary Worker at Beechipalli Kalyana Mandapam, r/o Beechipalli, Mahaboobnagar District. Respondent/Petitioner. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO.1890 OF 2002 JUDGMENT: Heard both the sides. This appeal is at the instance of the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam/Management as against the order, dated 27.09.2001 in W.P.No.24233 of 1999, of the learned Single Judge allowing the Writ Petition filed by the respondent herein seeking to assail the proceedings in regard to his absorption to the post of Sanitary Worker. As he discharged his duties as a watchman, his services have to be regularized in that post only but not otherwise. The learned Single Judge, after contest, held that the petitioner was initially appointed as a Watchman on 10.02.1988. Even though he discharged his duties as a Sanitary Worker for some period, it would not in any way affect his initial appointment. Further, in view of the proceedings dated 11.04.1997, the petitioner cannot be denied of his claim for the post of Watchman. Therefore, a direction was given to absorb the writ petitioner to the post of watchman with effect from 01.08.1991. Having regard to the findings as arrived at, which are not seriously in dispute, especially in regard to the very appointment of the respondent herein as a Watchman, we do not find any merits to interfere with the impugned order. In the result, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. No costs. ___________________ B. PRAKASH RAO, J _____________ D. APPA RAO, J 7th February 2006. Chvn.