Criminal Misc. No. M-32064 of 2008 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Criminal Misc. No. M-32064 of 2008 Date of Decision: 14.1.2009 Satnam Singh and Another …Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and Another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Vivek K. Thakur, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Mehardeep Singh, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, for respondent No.1. Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advocate, has caused appearance for respondent No.2-complainant and also filed reply by way of affidavit. Affidavit is taken on record. Complainant is also present in the Court. He has been duly identified by his counsel. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No. 17 dated 12.2.2008 registered at Police Station Sadar, Kapurthala, under Sections 379/34 IPC on the basis of compromise. Complainant-respondent No.2 has stated that his trolley was stolen by unidentified persons. Petitioners have been found to be Criminal Misc. No. M-32064 of 2008 2 accused. Petitioners have annexed affidavit of Santokh Singh, complainant-respondent No.2 with the present petition as Annexure P2 to state that on intervention of respectables his grudge against the petitioners has been removed. In the reply filed, it has been stated that complainant- respondent No.2 does not want to pursue the present FIR and the parties are residing peacefully. Santokh Singh, complainant-respondent No.2, who is present in the Court, states that he has found his trolley back, therefore, he has no objection if the present FIR is quashed. In view of the reply filed and statement made by complainant- respondent No.2 Santokh Singh who has been duly identified by his counsel and taking into consideration ratio of mandate of law laid down by Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh v. State of Punjab 2007(3) Recent Criminal Reports 1052, continuation of proceedings will not fructifie. Therefore, the present petition is accepted and FIR along with all the consequential proceedings is quashed. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge January 14, 2009 “DK”