1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4492 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Coram: Shrihari P. Davare, J. Date : 06.05.2011. 1. Heard Shri S.G. Nandedkar, learned A.P.P. for the applicant-State, and Smt. S.G. Chincholkar, learned Advocate for Respondents. 2. This is an application preferred by the applicant-State, seeking condonation of delay of 44 days caused in filing accompanying criminal application for leave to file appeal. 3. Smt. Chincholkar, learned Advocate for the respondents opposed the present application, vehemently, and submitted that the same bears no 2 substance, and same is devoid of any merits, and hence, it be rejected. 4. Considering the contents of the application, and also considering the rival submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay, satisfactorily, and the said delay also does not appear to be willful, deliberate and intentional and hence, same deserves to be condoned, in the interest of justice. 5. In the result, present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) and delay of 44 days caused in filing the accompanying criminal application seeking leave to file appeal, stands condoned, and the present application stands disposed of, accordingly. pnd/criap-4492.10 (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.)