}'^S-^'", <^^S>'» 'T^..;..^-"--^'&T^.\< ^^^•^- "s"l:-,,i^^' s?is>i"i ^ •sFi.ff^ ^•fcff?.?'^.^. ^iC^^fT'S ©^ pr?SB '^••--^ HON'BLES. B. THE.HQN'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUE WRIT PETITION fS) No. L( ^ I L( / 20J,1 PfcTITIONERS: 1. Smt Heeramani Chandrawanshi, W/o Shri Doman Singh Chandrawanshi, Aged about 47 years, R/o Near Bus Stand Kharora, District Raipur, C.G. 2. Smt Usha Verma, W/o Jaiprakash Verma, Aged about 47 years, R/o Village Chuheeya, Block Balodabazar; District Raipur, C.G. VERSUS RESPONDENTS: .1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Education, Ministry, D.K.S. Building, Raipur, C.G. 2. The District Education Officer, District Raipur, C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA K!GH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT SIL&SPO'R SB : HGN'BLS lCB PRITI1 versus Sint. Heeramsuu Cna-Tidrawan & Anoth.er State of C.G. & Otliers S3iri Alok DewaaKEiB., coiinsel fbr tbe peatioaers. Sbri Yashwant Siush Thakur, Dy. A.G. for fhe StaTe. Gounsel s.ppearing for thc petitioiiers submits fb.at fee issue ia.volved isi fae case is as to whefher tlie petitioaers are enntled to legular pay scale w.e.f. tfae date of mitia!, appomtinent or after completion ofprobatiou period. T'b.e issue iavolved herein, wa§ considered by t&e 1 Otkers), whereia it. was held that tbe siiniiarly situaxed teachei-s are eafrltled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date ofinirial appoiBtiEect. Tbe uiatter was taken 'up to fhe Honlale Supreine Cuiirt. The appeai was dismissed by the Hoii'ble Supreme Court upboldmg tlie decision of ttie Tribuaat, to th.e effect £hat thc Teachers/Assistaiit 'TeacSiers asTe entitled to regiilar pay scale froiii the date of uiifri.al. a.ppo.uitmen,t. Couiise! appearing for tta,e petitioners fi.irtber submits tliat this Qourt, wfaile consideiiQg the same issue in Parcs Nath Gwpta. Vs. Sfete «fChhaWsgwk& Others (W.P.(Sj. Ko. 58 of 2007} by order dated 15.1.2007, nas graiited regular pay seaie w.e.f. the date of iiutial appoia.tineiit. Coasiderilie; tlie a"Dove tactual a.nd leeal ttie 'preseiyl petition is disposed.ofwith a dBrcctioil to the 'petitioners to approach {:' ff" ""*>. ^ i fc:^. 1 'i;3!<£3SBi : ^ the resp. No.2 by Sliag representatioa withia two weeks and in fee eventaali'ty of filmig any such representa.tion the aufh.onty conccraed woiild decide the saaie in accordance wjth 3aw as expeditiouslv as possible. It is luade cliear that this Court has not expressed any opiniori on m.erits of tjie case aa.d fhe authoritv conceracd would be a.t libcm" to decide the appeal of fiie petitioner ia accordance witli Isw. Sd/- <,/' L