IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24704 of 2008 SATYENDRA NARAYAN SINGH @ SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 9/7/2008 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the State. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated in this case for the offence under Section 366A of the Indian Penal Code for the reason that major daughter of the informant has solemnized her marriage with the son of the petitioner namely, Pankaj Kumar. The informant in spite of the marriage of her daughter Sweta Kumari with Pankaj Kumar, forcibly got her married on 6.5.2007 but she left her house in the company of her husband Pankaj Kumar. It has also been submitted that since the daughter of the informant is major it cannot be said that she has been abducted or taken away by Pankaj Kumar. Considering these facts, prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner Satyendra Narayan Singh @ Satyendra Kumar Singh is allowed in connection with Bihariganj P.S. Case No. 110 of 2007 in case of his arrest or surrender before the court below within four weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. S.Ali (Mridula Mishra, J.)