HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Criminai Revision No. 135 of 2006 Petitioner Smt. Tanuja Manikpuri W/o Rajendra aged Applicant about 35 years resident of Risali Bhata in the tahsii and District Durg (C.G.) Versys ResBondent Rajendra @ Rajan Das Minikpuri (holding post of patwari in revenue department) S/o Nakul Das aged 37 yeare r^dent of Gandhi Nagar ward No.22 Jagdalpur DistrictBastar(C.G.) REVISION PETITION UNDER SECTION 19 (41 (21 THE FAMILY COURTS ACT (SB: Hon'bte Mr. T.P. Sharma, J.) Shri C.R. Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner. ORDER (Passed on 1st April, 2008) 1. This revision is directed agaihst the order datect 21.12.2005 passed by the Second Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Durg in Criminal M.J.C. No. 146/05 whereby the Judge, Family Court has dismissed the application for maintenance filed on behalf of the applicant on the ground that in the decree of divorce ttie appticant has consented the maintenance of Rs. 1000/- per montti. She is getting Rs. 1000/- per month as maintenance in the case of decree of divoree as a permanent alimony. 2. Counsel for the applicant heard. 3. Order impugned pemsed. 4. lt is argued on behalf of the applicant that the triai court has not awarded any maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and committed itlegality. 5. The Judge, Family Court has denied the claim of maintenance of the applicant on the ground that the applicant has consented in civil court i.e. case of divorce for maintenance of Rs. 1000/- per month 2-- 6. 7. J^ and she is oettina Rs. 10CX)/- per month as a permanent atimony. It is cjear from the order impugned and the copy of the judgment and decree dated 16.12.2003 in Civil Suit No. 7-A/2003 thatthe consent for decree of divorce and permanent alimony of Rs. 1000/- per month was passed where both the parties has consented for decree of divorce and permanent alimony of Rs. 1000/- per month. After taking into consideration the decree of civit court, the tearned Judge, Family Court has rejected the application for maintenance on the ground of consent for decree of a permanent alimony. The trial court has not committed any illegality or irregularity in the order impugned. Consequently, revision is dismissed at the stage of admission. In view of the above order, M.(Cri.)P 425/2006 and i.A. No. 596/2006 stend disposed of. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge