5~ GoyRT FEES BxayrpTeo •V»OTIF}S^i?^iM0.9e6Q/D-2878flO|- B/C.SJ05/ ^ 3! ECIREO IN SCH£OUtt t OFTH£COURTreESACT1||T Sltt9^8«^» INTHEJilGH COURT QF JUDICATURE AT BTLASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P. (L) N0. ^a>$^> /2009 PETITIONER: 'IONER: \^ ^ ^^ii^. .••:-r'lp^^---"" ^ ^^T1^^ RESPONDENTS: State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division - Kabirdham (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Sindhidas, S/o ~ Ghasidas Tadiya, R/o - Ganganagar Ward No. 1, Tahsil & District - Kabirdham (C.G.) 2. The Labour Court, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA \ ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON (L) No. 2350 of2009 PETITIONER : State ofChhattisgarh. VERSU8 RESmNDENTS : Sindhidas & Another. WRIT PETITION UNDER AR'HCLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTmjTION OFI>JDIA SB: Hon^ble Shri Satish K. Aemhotri, J. Present: Shri Sushil Dubey, Govemment Advocate tbrthe State/petitioner. Shri Ajit Siiigh, Advocate fortfae respondent No. 1. OKDER(ORAL) (Passed on 11th day of January, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing ft>r the petitioner, on mstmctions, suhmit that since fhe respondent No. l has already been regulaiized m service, nothing remains for adjudication in fhis petrtion. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side does not controvert fhe above submission. 3. In view of the above, tfie writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit