IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-19917 of 2009 Date of decision: September 03, 2009 Sushil Kumar & another -Petitioners Versus State of Punjab -Respondent Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta Present: Mr. SS Rana, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Shilesh Gupta, DAG, Punjab. Rajan Gupta, J.(Oral) Learned State counsel ( on instructions from ASI Bachittar Singh, who is present in Court) submits that pursuant to order dated July 24,2009 petitioner No.1 has joined the investigation and is no longer required for custodial interrogation. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the interim order dated July 24, 2009 is hereby made absolute qua petitioner No.1 Sushil Kumar, subject to the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition qua petitioner No.1 stands allowed. So far as petitioner No.2 Reshma is concerned, learned State counsel submitted that she is not an accused in the FIR. In view of the above, petition qua petitioner No.2 is dismissed as infructuous. [Rajan Gupta] Judge September 03, 2009. 'ask'