IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 1848 of 2007 (Pandurang Ramkrushna Anturkar & Ors. vs. State & Ors.) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr.B.N.Jaipurkar, Adv. for the Petitioners. Mr.Sambre, Government Pleader for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and 9. CORAM : D.D.Sinha and Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, JJ. DATE : November 20, 2007. Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. At the outset, Mr. Sambre, learned Government Pleader has submitted that there is alternate remedy available to the petitioners against the mutation entry recorded in the Revenue Record by Talathi (Sub-Ordinate Officer) in view of the provisions of Section 247, Schedule E of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code before the Sub- Divisional Officer. In that view of the matter, we dispose of the petition with liberty to the petitioners to approach the competent Authority for redressal of their grievance against the mutation made by the Talathi within a period of four weeks. With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE