1 D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (WRIT) NO.375/2008 Smt. Manju Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. Date of Judgment :: March 04, 2008. HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.NARAYAN ROY HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr. Narendra Mishra for the appellant. *** Heard learned counsel for the appellant. The writ application filed by the writ petitioner, wife of the deceased employee was dismissed by the writ Court. It appears that earlier the husband of the writ petitioner had approached this Court for payment of pay scale. This Court, however, directed for payment of minimum of the pay scale meant for Class IV post. Subsequently, it was detected that some more payments were made to the husband of the writ petitioner; the authorities had directed for recovery of the same which was challenged by the husband of the writ petitioner before the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal. During pendency of that matter, the husband of the writ petitioner died and the proceeding before the Appellate Tribunal stood dismissed for non-prosecution. On account of the death of husband of the writ petitioner, she got herself appointed on compassionate ground and at the same time, she had given undertaking to the authorities that the 2 dues which were recoverable from her husband would be paid by her. Since the dues were not paid by the writ petitioner, the matter was pursued for recovery; ultimately giving rise to the instant writ application which was dismissed. It appears to be an admitted position that certain dues were there against the husband of the writ petitioner which were recoverable; at the same time, it is also undisputed that the writ petitioner had also given undertaking to repay the dues. In the given facts and circumstances of the case and noticing the subsequent developments whereby and whereunder the writ petitioner was given appointment on compassionate ground, the learned Single Judge of this Court refused to grant any relief. On appreciation of pleadings of the parties and the facts referred to above, it is held that the learned Single Judge of this Court was perfectly right in dismissing the writ application and the order impugned can, therefore, in no manner be termed to be bad either in law or on facts. For the reasons aforementioned, therefore, we find no merit in this appeal. It is accordingly dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ),J. (NARAYAN ROY),CJ. Skant/-