XI—HC-zz ;Ea2mnami m?@,%anQI mama; W? 111§l§r m. 200 ' WWEWW 15.5-2005 Mr, B.K. Rawat, couns: Mr. Y.s. Thakur, Govt. Tha petitioners have preferred this writ petition in respect of with a prayer that respondent-State be directed to decide the application of ‘ the petitioners for variation oif permit conditions and timing. Counsel for the pen'tic regular pemit holders on petitioners moved an applica change in ihe timings on 2.] under Statutory obligation t< I the same as per provisions o: 80(3) of the Motor Vehicle Ac not decide the application 01 the petitioners submits that application of the petitione: learned counsel for the mspoi - Having heard learned Iegaxd to the facts and cirou .is directed to decide the appi with law within a period of tw‘ With the direch'on aforc Gem‘hed copypas per ru :1 for the petitioners. Adv. for thg Stata. Permit No.7/01 & 69/03 Transport Authority, Raipur the route Raigarh tor Ranchi. Jners submits that the petitioners are The Ltion for variation in the condition and 2.2002 and 23.2.2004 and the STA is ) consider the‘application and decide t Section 72 (xxixmi) read with Section ibut inspite of repeated request STA is fthe petitioners. Therefore, counsel for respondents be directed to decide the rs in accordance With law to which udents has no objection. counsel t‘or‘the parties and having mstances of the case, respondent No. 1 ication of the petitioners in accordance o months h‘om today. said, the petition stands disposed of. les. t v‘ t; Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge ,