1 LPA254/10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.254 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5435 OF 2009 Shri Chandrakant B. Bandgar ...Appellant v/s The State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents Mr A.B. Avhad i/b Mr B.A. Lawate for Appellant. None for Respondents. CORAM : D.K.DESHMUKH AND ANOOP V. MOHTA JJ. DATE : 7TH SEPTEMBER 2011. 2 LPA254/10 P.C. :- 1] Initially, ration shop was allotted in favour of Premchand J. Yadav. He died. Therefore, as per the order passed by this Court in one writ petition claim of his widow and the two remaining applicants by name Gajanan Nalawade and the present appellant were considered. According to the authority, as Gajanan was a handicapped person, he had a higher priority and he was selected and allotment was made in his favour. That was subjected to revision before the State Government. That decision was challenged before the learned Single Judge. The learned Single Judge rejected the petition. The only statement made before us was that while Gajanan was running the shop after grant, the licence granted in his favour was suspended on allegation of some irregularity. The learned Single Judge has observed that this is totally irrelevant. In our opinion, the learned Single Judge is perfectly justified in holding that subsequent suspension of the licence of Gajanan is totally 3 LPA254/10 relevant to decide the question whether initial grant in favour of Gajanan was valid or invalid. There is no substance in the appeal. It is rejected. Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Sheristedar / Private Secretary of this Court. Certified copy expedited. ( JUSTICE D.K. DESHMUKH ) ( JUSTICE ANOOP V. MOHTA )