- 1 - 1 - 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 4175 OF PETITION NO. 4175 OF PETITION NO. 4175 OF 1989 Transport Dock Workers Union Bombay..Petitioner. vs. Maharashtra State Warehousing Corpn...Respondents. & ors. .. Mr.M.N.Bhatkal with Mr.P.L.Naik for Petitioner Mr.P.Ramaswami for Respondent no. 1 .. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.P.SHAH AND : A.P.SHAH AND : A.P.SHAH AND S.U.KAMDAR, S.U.KAMDAR, S.U.KAMDAR, JJ JJ JJ DATE: DATE: DATE: 28TH SEPTEMBER, 2004. 28TH SEPTEMBER, 2004. 28TH SEPTEMBER, 2004. ORAL RAL RAL ORDER ( Per A.P.Shah, J) ORDER ( Per A.P.Shah, J) ORDER ( Per A.P.Shah, J) 1. We have heard Mr. Bhatkal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Ramaswami appearing for the respondent no. 1. Respondent nos. 2 to 4 are absent. Respondent no. 4 is a formal party. 2. We have recorded in the companion writ petition being Writ Petition No. 1595 of 1993 that the petitioner therein who is the 2nd respondent in the present petition has become defunct and is no longer operating in the 1st respondent Corporation. In that view of the matter, the impugned order passed by the Industrial Court is also rendered infructuous. Therefore, nothing survives in this - 2 - 2 - 2 - petition and petition is accordingly disposed of. A.P.SHAH, J S.U.KAMDAR, J