-1- IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO.1087 OF 2006 NO.1087 OF 2006 NO.1087 OF 2006 Shri Chandanmal D. Gandhi and anr. ...Appellants v/s M/s Khinvasara Chavan, through its partners ...Respondents Ms Gauri Godse for Appellants. None for Respondents. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH J. DATE : 13TH JULY 2007. -2- P.C. :- 1. This appeal is filed by the original plaintiffs. The case of the original plaintiffs is that the development agreement entered into between the parties became void because the land was reserved for garden. The Appeal Court has held that on the date on which the agreement was entered into , the land was already reserved for garden. The learned counsel appearing for appellants fairly states that even before the agreement was entered into, it was declared that the land is reserved for garden. I do not see any substantial question of law arises in this appeal. Appeal is rejected. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Sheristedar / Private Secretary as true copy. . Certified copy expedited. -----------------