1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 21 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7061 OF 2008 Harshad H. Jambusaria ... Petitioner v/s M.D.Readymoney Apartment Co-op. Hsg. Society Ltd. ... Respondent Mr.Thakkar with Ms.Jai Kanade ii/by M/s.Gordhandas & Fozdar for the petitioner. Mr.Ajay Khandkar i/by M/s.Ajay Khandkar & Co. for the respondent. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 14TH AUGUST, 2009 P.C.: 1. The review petition has been filed against an order passed on 16.10.2008. According to the learned counsel appearing for the review petitioner, (i) issues which were argued have not been considered by the Court while passing the order; and (ii) certain findings in the order under review 2 are contrary to the record. 2. In my opinion, these submissions made on behalf of the petitioner cannot, in any manner, indicate that the review petition is maintainable. A review would be maintainable only when there is an error apparent on the face of the record or some documents or facts have come to the knowledge of the petitioner much after the order was passed, despite due diligence on the part of the petitioner to obtain the facts. The present review petition does not raise any of these issues. Assuming certain findings of this Court are erroneous, it would not mean that the review petition is maintainable. The petitioner would have to avail of other remedies. 3. Review petition dismissed. ..... 3