IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 566 of 2008 Smt. Anshu & others. … Petitioners Vs. State of Uttarakhand and Others. … Respondents Mr. R.K.S. Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. H.C. Pujari, Addl. G.A. for respondent nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent no. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. R.K.S. Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. H.C. Pujari, Addl. G.A. for respondent nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent no. 3. 2. Mr. H.C. Pujari, the learned Addl. G.A. submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners, has become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case have submitted the chargesheet against the petitioners before the court concerned on 13.01.2009. This fact has been indicated in Para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Consequently, the Interim order dated 22.07.2008 stands vacated automatically. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 05.03.2009 V.K.