ssp 1 WP(L) 1848 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.1848 OF 2011 Anita S. Dashputre .....Petitioner versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Ors. ..... Respondents Ms.Sumedha Rao, for the petitioner. Ms.P.A.Purandare, for the respondents. CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR & R.M.SAVANT, JJ. DATE: 06 th SEPTEMBER, 2011 P.C. 1. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the building is in dangerous and dilapidated condition. In our view, it is for the respondent No.1 Corporation to consider this aspect as to whether the building is required to be demolished immediately or any other directions are to be given in this behalf. The present petition itself may be treated as a representation to the respondent-Corporation and within a period of four weeks, the respondent-Corporation may take appropriate decision on the representation of the petitioner. Except the above direction, no other directions can be issued against the respondent No.3 who is the landlady of the premises in question, in our writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of ssp 2 WP(L) 1848 of 2011 the Constitution of India. The writ petition to accordingly stand disposed of. ( R.M.SAVANT, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )