1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No.531/2008 (Iqbal vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : February 06, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Mukesh Patodia, for the petitioner. Mr.J.P.S.Choudhary, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. The petitioner is facing trial for the offences under sections 452, 323/34 I.P.C.. The petitioner was granted bail but he failed to appear before the trial court. However, after having been arrested, he moved a bail application before the trial court, which came to be rejected by the trial court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that if the petitioner is granted bail, he will continuously appear before the trial court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial and will not repeat the bail jump. Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the oral arguments advanced 2 by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and petitioner Iqbal s/o Peeru Pinara be released on bail in Cr. Regular Case No.553/2007 (70/2000) pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Jahajpur, Distt. Bhilwara provided he furnishes a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 5000/- to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-