-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3174 OF 2008 Hari Shridhar Athawale ... Petitioner versus Shankar Nagesh Joshi ....Respondents Mr. M.V. Limaye for the petitioner. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR, J. DATE: JUNE 20, 2008. P.C. By filing this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order of the District Court, Pune dated 10th January, 2008, in Civil Revision Application No. 19 of 2007. By the impugned order, the learned District Judge has partly allowed the revision application of the present petitioner and fixed the standard rent at Rs. 2,000/-. 2. The respondent-tenant preferred a standard rent application before the trial Court . The said application was allowed by the learned trial Judge and fixed the standard rent at Rs. 1,000/-. The present petitioner challenged the said order by filing a revision before the District Judge. The learned District Judge, after considering the relevant material allowed the said revision application and modified the order of the trial Court and -2- ultimately fixed the standard rent at Rs. 2,000/- per month inclusive of all taxes and permitted increases. 3. Considering the reasoning given by the learned Appellate Judge, in my view, this is not a case in which this Court should exercise its jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India especially when even the prayer of the present petitioner has been allowed by the appellate Judge and fixed the standard rent at Rs. 2,000/-. Therefore, no interference is called for. Petition is rejected. P.B. MAJMUDAR, J.