1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.3 OF 2006 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.48 OF 2004 Mr.Dhondiram Maruti Bhosale. ..Petitioner. V/s. Mr.A.D.Sawant & ors. ..Respondents. Mr.Kishore R.Jagdale for petitioner. Mr.B.V.Phadnis, advocate for respondent No.1. Mr.H.A.Solkar, AGP for respondent No.2,4 and 5. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : JANUARY 19, 2007. DATE : JANUARY 19, 2007. DATE : JANUARY 19, 2007. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. As it is not in dispute that the petitioner’s papers have already been forwarded by the authorities to the State Government for fixation of his pension, there is no reason to entertain this petition, which intends to revive the contempt petition in terms of the liberty given to the petitioner under Order dated 18th July, 2006. Hence, dismissed. 2. All other issues are left open in the event petitioner takes recourse to appropriate proceedings.