IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1121 of 2007 HARI CHARAN RAI & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 30.7.2008 Heard learned counsel for the parties. This application has been filed against the order dated 6.8.2007 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Danapur in Trial No.1135/07 thereby the petition filed by the petitioners for discharge has been rejected. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the court below has not properly considered the material available on the record and has wrongly rejected the prayer for discharge. These petitioners are not directly involved in the alleged crime of misappropriation. On the other hand learned counsel for Opposite Party filed counter affidavit and submitted that charge has already been framed vide order dated 5.7.2008 (Annexure-A) and the case is pending for trial. Considered the submission of learned counsel for the parties as well as the materials discussed in the impugned order dated 6.8.2007. I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly, this application is rejected at the stage of admission itself. However, the court below is directed to dispose of the case in the light of direction given by this Court in its earlier order. B.Jha (Ghanshyam Prasad)