1 CWP No.7064/06 Man Singh & Another Vs.State & Others IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7064 Of 2006. Man Singh Meena son of Shri Harsahai Meena & Another VERSUS The State of Rajasthan and Others Date of Order :::: 04/08/2009 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh Mr. Timan Singh, Advocate, for Mr. Tarun Jain, Counsel for the Petitioners. Dr. M.S. Kachhawa and Mr. Anuj Tak, Counsel for the Respondents Per Court : Heard learned counsel for the parties. The relief, which has been claimed in the writ petition by the petitioner interalia is for issuance of a direction to the respondent No.3 to add the name of the petitioner in the register maintained by it for Nature Guides for the Ranthambhore National Park, Sawai Madhopur and to permit him to work as Nature Guide in Ramthambhore National Park. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has successfully completed the 2 CWP No.7064/06 Man Singh & Another Vs.State & Others training conducted by the Department of Tourism, Art and Culture, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur and is entitled to work as tourist guide. In support of the above, the petitioner has filed the certificates Annexure-1 and 1-A. The petitioner has further contended that between 25th of July, 2005 to 31st July, 2005 the training for the Nature Guides was jointly conducted by the Tourism and Forest Department at Sawai Madhopur and also for being registered as Nature Guides in the Ramthambhore National Park, Sawai Madhopur. He submits that despite the above, the petitioner has not been permitted to work as Nature Guide by the Forest Department and the officials of the Ranthambhore National Park. The respondents have filed their reply in response to the notice, wherein the fact with regard to the petitioner having been enrolled as guide by the Department of Tourism is not disputed. However, the respondents have placed reliance on the order Annexure R/1 dated 4th December, 2006 issued in relation to selection and training of Nature Guide for the Ranthambhor National Park, wherein as per learned counsel for the respondents the complete procedure for recruitment and issuance of license for Nature Guide has been prescribed. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. So far as the case of the petitioner is concerned, it is not disputed that the petitioner has completed the training 3 CWP No.7064/06 Man Singh & Another Vs.State & Others successfully, as would be evident from Annexure-1, the certificate issued by the Department of Tourism as well as Annexure 1-A, which is also issued by the Government of Rajasthan, Department of Tourism, Art & Culture. Be that as it may, since the respondents have subsequently framed composite guidelines and prescribed the complete procedure for registration of Nature Guide as per (Annexure R/1), it is necessary that the petitioner must acquired the necessary license in accordance with law laid down as per the aforesaid procedure provided under Annexure R/1. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the respondents are directed that in case the petitioner submits his application for a license for a Nature Guide, he would be permitted to be included in the training, as per the aforesaid circular, for Nature Guides and on completion of the same, he would be permitted to act as a Nature Guide in the Ranthambhore National Park, Sawai Madhopur keeping the past experience and training completed successfully by the petitioner. Subject to the above, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Dalip Singh) J. ashok/