1312wp3769.11.odt 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3769 of 2011. Gargi Sudhanshu Sekhar Das ..vs.. Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University, Nagpur. =-=-==-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr. C.S.Samudra, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr. B.G.Kulkarni for the respondent. C ORAM : D.D.SINHA AND A.P.BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : 13th DECEMBER, 2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondent. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner appeared for first year examination of Bachelor of Technology (bio-technology) in the month of March, 2011. Results were declared by the University on 18/05/2011 and petitioner was declared failed in the subject i.e. Applied Physical Chemistry, Paper – I and secured 34 marks out of 100 marks. The petitioner requested respondent for revaluation of the said paper. However, the University issued notification of no change to the marks allotted to the petitioner after revaluation. This court issued notice before admission, limited to question No. 1(b) of the question paper of the said subject. On 14th September, 2011, Mr.Kulkarni, the learned counsel for 1312wp3769.11.odt 2 the University made a statement before this court that the University was willing to have the answer to question No.1(b) verified from an expert and make a statement in this regard. Mr. Kulkarni has submitted that the question No.1 has been revalued by another expert in the subject who has submitted report, which is placed on record of the writ petition today. The clause 6 of the said report reads thus. “Hence according to my valuation the candidate is entitled to get 05 marks out of total 06 for the answer to question No.1(b).” It is in view of this report of revaluation done by Dr.Yenkie, we direct the University to include 5 marks given to the question no.1(b) of the answer book in respect of the subject as referred to herein above in the total marks received by the petitioner and modified the result accordingly. The University should complete whole process within a period of fifteen days from today. With these observations and directions, writ petition is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE. chute 1312wp3769.11.odt 3