IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7974 of 2009 1. LAXMI DEVI wife of Manoj Kumar Singh, Centre- Munshidihari, Panchayat- Rajpur, Code No. 144, P.S. Natwar, District Rohtas 2. Savita Devi wife of Ajay Kumar Singh, Centre- Natwarkalan, Panchayat- Tenuaj, P.S. Natwar, Distt. Rohtas 3. Kiran Devi wife of Kumar Ravi Ranjan, Centre- Arang II, P.S. Dinara, Panchayat Arang, Code No. 102, District Rohtas 4. Sushila Devi wife of Santosh Kumar Singh, Centre- Chorpokhar English I, Panchayat- Mednipur, Code No. 23, P.S. Dinara, Distt Rohtas 5. Sandhya Devi wife of Nitya Nand Singh, Centre Dinara, Panchayat Samahuti, Code No. 85, P.S. Dinara, District Rohtas 6. Sunita Devi wife of Santosh Kumar Centre Nadwan, Code No. 139, Panchayat Maharor, P.S. Natwar, Distt. Rohtas 7. Sandhya Devi wife of Kalika Nand Ojha, Centre Moudihara, Code No. 142, Panchayat Rajpur, P.S. Natwar, Distt. Rohtas 8. Deventi Devi wife of Sushil Kumar Singh, Centre Tenuath, Code No. 161, Panchayat Haribanshpur, P.S. Dinara, Distt. Rohtas 9. Pushpa Devi wife of Binod Kumar Singh, Centre Jamodhi, Code No. 145, P.S. Natwar, Distt. Rohtas 10. Nirmala Devi wife of Nand Kumar Singh, Centre Asian, Code No. 146, Panchayat Rajpur, P.S. Natwar, Distt. Rohtas 11. Anita Devi wife of Dinesh Singh, Centre Sundarvan, Code No. 47, Panchayat Bhanpur, P.S. Dinara, Distt. Rohtas Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department Govt. of Bihar 3. Director, Integrated Child Development Scheme, Indra Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna 4. District Magistrate, Rohtas 5. District Programme Officer, Rohtas, Sasaram 6. Child Development Project Officer, Dinara ----------- 02/ 14.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners were appointed as Anganwari Sewika on different centres. Their appointment was directed to be cancelled by the District Programme Officer under order, bearing No. 711 dated 1.10.2008, Annexure-5 to this application. Later, they represented before the District Programme Officer, who passed order, bearing letter No. 106 dated 9.3.2009, Annexure-7 2 reinstating the petitioners. The order reinstating the petitioners, however, was not acted upon by the Child Development Project Officer on the basis of the telephonic instruction of the District Magistrate, as it appears from the information furnished with No. 82 dated 15.5.2009, Annexure-8 to this application. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that along with the petitioners, Anganwari Sewika of Dehri Rural Project were also terminated under order dated 1.10.2008, Annexure-5 to this application, but they have already been reinstated in compliance of the order dated 9.3.2009, Annexure-7 to this application, but the petitioners are not being reinstated. Let the petitioners represent before the District Magistrate, Sasaram and he should consider the same in accordance with law and allow the petitioners also the similar treatment, which was allowed to Anganwari Sewika of Dehri Rural Project. The consideration of the representation of the petitioners be made as early as possible, in any case within one month from the date of its receipt. This application is, accordingly, ,disposed of. Arjun/ ( V.N. Sinha, J.)