1-f) c' /f IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. saa / 2002 7 PETITIONER Dewashish Ganguli, S/o Shri B. K. Ganguli R/o Arvi.ndo Enclave, Pachpedi Naka, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS IA .^i^ ^* .^1 ^t3s5: .-^%% ta-'' -^<V*' -.\J'-.>'*' &^ ?;»" v ,j-'; State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Public Works D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Behind Aakashwani, Raipur ; 3. Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, B & R Division No. - 2, Raipur (C.G.) WRI1 PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 sn^iw' k-ii'ti sii^i ^W ^li^ 'ssi^ •^(fflcl*!,^gi'y'iG, I«<ww<y HIHCTI aiNICB N^T1C(31^ _MJ^&..^Q...I..."g'l, 200 ^t^St' 05.07.2003 Shri Sudhir Verm.a, coun^ Shri Surul Smha, Addl. A^ Heard. This pctition has bccn f^Lcd on. Uic ground that at thc tlTne of foniiatioH of new Statel •pursuant to notice of the subinitted tender •wbich was act successfuUy coinpleted'the wori(: aiid tenas aad there is no coia^ by ftie petitioner. In spite offb) inade so far. By this petitidn, t| direction to ftie respoadents to| auiouiit aa& ;further to-pay intE^ Leamed counsel for the p: has passed an. order ui s: Nos.71/2002, 72/2002 aad 73/ Having heard leairicd coi: aad circuiastaaccs of fhc casc, '*Wf<"l<i)'l N|t|<'if4feZt,t(a|t<(l< ^3lPa*T 311^1 6l for the petitioner. tvocate (?eneral for the State. of Cbliattisgarh, the petitioner Goveraiaent invituig tender, septed aad thereafter petitioner and fulGBed aU the Gonditions 'laiat agaiust fhe work. executed at 'fhe paynients have not been h^e petitioner has prayed for the pay/release forthwith balanee •est on fhe atbresaid amount.at arties subuiitted thatthis Court Tnilar writ .petitions beariag 2003. -iiscl and consideriiig thc facts iiiatcrial on rccord aad witiiout ::;ilritrriiA<i,uiA., XI-HC-22 sii^r^ii. Rlict> <iti^t ?n4iieti -yli^ ny^vv *^__ 'ysi •t\Wv\^, o-alti'is, I<«ni«y STT^T 'qSRL ttfCTi a)*<i<n te^ar' entering into fhe inerits of ttie along^ifh Court, it would be just aild detailed represenfation respondent -Np. 2/ Chief Engine^ inade, the respondent No.2 accordance with. law as earlv d case, in th.e opinion of fhis p^oper that the petitioner to file a copy of fhe petition before LCitr aiid ifsuch a representation is thaU consider and decide it in uieitr exaTniTiatjon, if it; is found rcceipt of such. payment, ne^ alreadv been observed bv fbls It is inadc clcar that no: bc vicwcd scriouslv. Wifh the bbserve.fioiLs petition startds disposed pf; and;I.A.Nos;i2704/2002 for UT! for direction resppndents also Certi&ed photocopy, .ifai ^)[^fi?i'4)PI Hw<flf ^ fst<il •tf^i^i<i ^T SlPtIH S^V j. fs possible, preferably witliia bvo months fi-om the date of prc|duction of representation. Oa tl|iat ttie petitioaer is entitled to ;ssan''.action be taken, as has (f>3UrtiaW.P.No. 2173/2001. ji-coiapUao.cc of this ordcr shall inade hereinabpve, this writ (po&seqrfenfly, M.W.P.No.274/02 ^ent hearmg and I.A.No.4325/02 ^taad disposed of. for. ifaplplied ^^ f^ 5,^ jt