IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.48045 of 2008 SANTOSH YADAV @ BABUA,son of Baishakhi Yadav,resident of village-Jalalpur,P.S.- Kako,Dist.-Jehanabad. Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.2686 of 2009 CHITRANJAN KUMAR,son of Anand Bihari Singh, resident of village-Teni Bigha,P.S.-Jehanabd,Dist.-Jehanabad. Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.6200 of 2009 SATISH KUMAR,son of Upendra Prasad, resident of village-Nisarpura,P.S.-Kako, Dist.-Jehanabad. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03/ 20-03-2009 As all the above three cases arise out of the same P.S.case number, they are heard together. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is no evidence against the petitioners. Only printout of their calls have been obtained and found talk to each other. But in the case a stolen mobile was recovered from petitioner of Cr.Misc.No.6200/2009. Sim of petitioner of Cr.Misc.No.2686/2009 was used in mobile set of petitioner of Cr.Misc.No.48045/2008 and talk is there in between all the three. No doubt, FIR is against unknown and no other evidence is there to connect the petitioners in crime but discussed material is sufficient to not allow them on bail at this stage. Accordingly, these petitions are rejected. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )