g IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH V .WK AT BILASPUR 3MGLE BENQFE W.P.(S) No. Smaé /2010 / PETITIONER Ashok Kumar Verma, S/o. Shri R.B. Verma aged about 48 years WO Qtr No RH 2 P WD Colony, Korba (C G) VERSUS ‘ / RESPONDENTS 1] State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Public Works Department, D.K.S.‘ Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) / 2] Engineer-in—Chief, Public Works Department, Sirpur Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) / 3] Chief Engineer, Public» Works Department, Setu Parikshetra Raipur (C,G.) 4] Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Bridge Division Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 5] Sheikh Riyaz Mohammed, Sub— Engineer/ ln-charge, Sub-Divisional Officer, Public Works Department, Bridge Sub—Division No.1, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.5406 OF 2010 PETITIONER Ashok Kumar Verma Versus RESPONDENT State of Chhattisgarh & Others é? ‘ (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) ' Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Manoj Paranjape & Shri Vaibhav Goverdhan, Advocates for the petitioner. Shri Sushii Dubey, Govt. Advocate for the State. Shri KR. Nair, Advocate for the respondent No.5.f. ORDER ORAL (Passed on this 18t day of February, 2011) At the very outset, Iearned counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that in view of the order dated 18-2—2011 passed by this Court in W.P. (S) No.5727 of 2010 (Sheikh Riyaz Mohmad v. State of C.G. & Others), nothing remains in this petition for adjudication. The State Government may pass fresh order posting the petitioner and the other officers in accordance with law having regard to the f administrative exigency as well as public interest. 2. In view of foregoing, the writ petition is dispose of. ‘ i Sd/- . ‘ Satish K. Agnihotri __ , i Judge Gowri