IGH Q) IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR (C.G.f WRIT PETITION NO.A^'2006 PETITIONER ^••••^ / .\ ^^^t) ^s^ ^-•""•^^y .^w^y ^""^'s^>'"* ^**'*" A®0"'3-'" •*'..t^~ .»•••' VERSUS Smt. Nivedita Mukherjee w/o Shri Tapas Mukherjee, aged about 42 years, working as an Assistant Professor, at Dr. Khub Chand Baghel Government College Bhilai- 3, Bhilai, R/o. 8/4, Radhika Nagar, Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.) RESPONDENTS -COPY Uto"A. G.^BILASPUS "Q^:cr;«3& State of Chhattisgarh, Through- the Secretary, Department of Higher Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 22r6 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT/WRITS, ORDER/ORDERS, OR/AND DIRECTION / DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURB OF MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI, OR OF ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE NATURE. t>* XI-HC-22 lltlWI shWW 3^ '<imM^, ®Tfl*i'is,Rdiyy< 3ii^i ^a<ft ..U3...^.^.%.'^.a-i 200^ RR^[ sn^r^r Ratesii^iT Stlliqi itltlRfl <,\ sii^iewiwnfw 7-7- AAr. 6.5. Agrawa\, Senior Ad\ petitioner. AAr. Sumesh BqJaj, 6ovt. Adv< copy. Hsard. By the instant writ petition India, the petitioner has questionf June, 2006 whereby she has been Sovt. Co\\ege, Bhiiai-3, District: Durj Sandai, District: Rcjnandgaon. The cose of ths petitioner service on 27-7-1998 at Sovt. Collc| she worked till 8-7-1993. She was College, Bsmhani Banjar to (Sovt. C| 1993, bu+ surprisin9!y, she was Ncn/cgarh onty 4 days after her ji transferr'ed from Navs9arh to 6ov1( and she wor-ked there ti!l 5-10-200t is studying in Clsss-IX and daughte^ the petitioner'*s transfer wili bcdly Therefore, lecrned couns^ peti+ioner- moy be oliowed to make <<ii<if<i'11-i *ii*fCTT?Tte^l'<Riwi<. ^i^rf^ITSn^T joccte with Mr. K.R. Nair, Advocats for the cste for the State/respondent, onadvance lunder Article 226 of the Constitution of |d the propriety of the order dcted 30 transferred from Dr. Uioobchand Ba9hei to Late Deviprasad Choubey 6ovt. Coiie9e, s that the petitioner has first joined her ^e, Bamhani Banjar", &istrict: Madla, where fransferred on her own request from 6ovt. ilege, Dur9. She joined at Durg on 10-7- ^ransferred from Durg to Sovt. Co!le9e, ining ct Durg. Thereafter, she was ogain College, Utai where shejoined on 3-8-1995 1. Tns petitioner' hcs two children, her son is studyin9Jn Clsss-II at Bhilai, ther-efore, trffect the educction of her children. for the petitioner submits thot the a reprssentation to the respondent cnd in (^^f^) "'>>- ^£:^_. XI-HC-22 3^ '*ii*itivt<i, eiTfly'is, Riirtwy ^-^^^^/ 200 *<i*mi a>ww ain^rqir teNrsn^T fW'ffl (tftfl aii^iswiwgfer 2- turn, -the respondsnt be directed iearned <?oyt. Advocate has no objei Hsving heard learned couns< facts and circumstances of the representation raising ait har grou^ todoy, and in turn, ths respondent the petitioner within a period of tw^ considering a!i the points raised by^ the meon time, the petitioner reiieved, tiii the decision on the rep With the directions cforessit Consequentiy. M.(W.)P.No.2^ disposed of. Parties are entitled for" certl shla t)i<)tti<fl-) tii»cir^'te^<.f5tt<;i< ^'?I^IT'3TI^T to decide the sama to which Mr. Bqjaj, ttion. j! for fhe parties and having regard to the cjpse, the petitioner 'is oilowed to make a |ris to the respondent within 10 dsys irom s directed to decide the rspressntction of inonths from the dote of its receipt after the petitioner, in accordanee with Sav. In not be relisved jf she is not cir'eady ihesentstion. i(d, the petition stcnds disposed of. . }51/2006 and I.A.No.6525/2006 aiso stand fied copy of this order. SdS- L.C. BhiiStSO Judge (^^f^r)