-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 594 OF 2008 Shir Popat Piliaji Barge .. Appellant. V/s. Shri Ramdas Piliaji Barge .. Respondent. --- Mr. Milind Deshmukh for the Appellant. --- CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 07th OCTOBER, 2008. DATED : 07th OCTOBER, 2008. DATED : 07th OCTOBER, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Deshmukh, learned counsel for the appellant,the original defendant. The respondent’s suit for partition and separate possession came to be decreed by the trial court. The appellant’s appeal to the lower appellate court came to be dismissed and therefore, the present second appeal. 2. Both the courts below have concurrently held that the suit property is the ancestral Hindu Joint Family property. It was further held that the appellant, who is the original defendant, failed to prove his case of alleged oral prior partition and consequently, granted partition decree in favour of the respondent. I do not see any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment. No question of law much less substantial question of law is involved . The appeal is dismissed. -: 2 :- (R.V.MORE,J.)