0&) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SINGLE 8ENCH : HON'BLE SHRi H.L. DATTU, C.J. Petitaoners: Respondents: Writ Petition No.924 of 2004. 3. 4. Manharan, S/0. Lakhan, aged 32 years, Up-Safpanch of Gram Panchayat Pendri (Sa), Laxmiprasad Dubey, S/o. Mathura Prasad Dubey, aged 39 years, Active member of Gram Sabha PendriCSa), Ramesh Dubey, S/o. Ram Nihora Dubey, aged 44 years, Active member of Gram Sabha Pendri (Sa), All the petitioners are R/o. Village Pendri (Sa), Tahsi! Mungeli, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus Stete of Chhattisgarh ThFoygh Prineipai Secretary, Ctepartment of Panchayat & Rural Oevelopmerit, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) Director, Panchayat, Ghhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) Additional Co!lector,Bilaspur (C.G) \ Sub Divisional Cfficer, Mungeli, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Pafharia, District Bilaspur Yesu Prakash, S/o. YesudES, aged 44 j years, Ex-Sarpanch, Grarn Panchayat Pendri jSsf), Tahsil MUngeli,DistrictBilaspur(C.G.) 1 Present: ShrilRajeevShrivastav^.cburiselforthe Retitioners. "^: o ORAL ORDER (Passed on 16th March, 2007) As on today, in myopinion, the relief sought for in this writ petition would not survive for consideratibn of this Court. Learnedcounsel appearing forthe petitionere is also ofthe same opinion. (2) In thatview of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructyous. Ordered i Sd/- Chief Jiistlce Judge 1I,!|