[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 32 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 32 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 32 OF 2007 Sanjay Ramrao Chandurkar ..Applicant V/s The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. Ms. Anajli Patil, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. U.V. Nikam, APP for the State. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 8TH MARCH, 2007. DATE : 8TH MARCH, 2007. DATE : 8TH MARCH, 2007. P.C. . Heard Ms. Anjali Patil, learned Counsel for the applicant and Mr. Nikam, learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant was arrested on the ground that he had played fraud on the Central Bank of India and had obtained loan of Rs. 1 crore against the property, which he did not own. When the application for bail filed by the applicant came up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the applicant had offered that the applicant would deposit Rs. 20,000/-. It was payment towards at least some part of the amount. This Court, by the order dated 18th September, 2006, while granting bail, directed the applicant to deposit Rs. 20,000/- per [2] month as per the offer. 3. Now, by this application, the applicant seeks relaxation of the condition on the ground that bank has already commenced the proceeding before DRT, his machinery is attached and also that another accused Vilas Deshpande has been relieved of similar condition imposed on him. It appears that Vilas Deshpande has retired from the said company or partnership but that is not case with the applicant. There is nothing to show that whole of the amount taken by the present applicant from the bank is recovered. Therefore, there is no justification to relax the condition. Application stands rejected. (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (J.H. BHATIA, J.)