^^y4^-. f^''^ "% ^Sis^^ \, Z]X<? v&.. ' '^"-^' ^f :^^:" ^i^r^r'^fe il^? ^^ ^^SE^ 1 ^IWffdiNT^ "3^T ^l^Kn^, ^^^, I^TRTy: —..M.(?.-...GSJ...&to.A2L'-/-0^ ^^....^.....^....^.^...............^..^^•^^ - ^ -^T^T Tra^> (^ii^^)- ^'waW ^sf^ ^iT^T PETITiONBR Kuidiar Vers&is Ashok Shri Mad£ omce of K£ Sambhag, (CG) State of G Water Re; D.K.S. Blia^ Executive Sambhag, ( (CG1 WRIT PETlTIOH UNDER AR'1 1. SB:HON. J 2.2-1-2009 Goft ^iin Ajay ^iinvastava, Shri Rakesh Jha, Dy. The petitioner has filecl tll "That this Hon-blel sioiilar order as passed| passed by this Hoiirble Q may also i3e considered 1| representation aiicl tlie witii me petitioner may c\ Leained coun^el for the! may be disposed ofwith Ubert| ^N^T^'W^t ^ |T^ ^fe^R '^^tfm^i^i Shaniia, aged 50 yiiears, son of |ava Prasad, Assistaiit Gi-ade - 3, ^yapalaii Abmyaiita, Jal Sajisadhaa Chhuikhadaji, Distt. RajnajT.dgaon hhattisgarh, tlirough Secretaiy, sources Dep?j:tx£ient, Miiiistiy vaii, Raipur (CG) Engiiieer, Jal SaiisadhaD. 'hhuikhadaa, Distt, Rajnaadgaoii ICLE 226 OrTHE.COeiBTiTUTiON OF SNmA Ac|vocate, for the petitioiier. ^oft, Aclv,, fortlie State, [e uistaiit petitioirfcr foUowiiig reMef;- 1 Court. may kuidly be pleased to pass ui orcler Aunexure r?-l aiid. ^-'<5, as |oiii~t., so tiiat petitioners siiiiiiar ciaiiii ^y tiie depai-tment 011 filiiig of detailed tincoiistitutional acf of discnQiiiiatiou bme to aii end. petitioner szibmits that tliis peUtion [~ to tiie petitioner to make a detailed ^S^^ ^k^lS^ <M^KASM—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,009. y^w^' y-^ ^t^--- ^WW 9hW^ -75ET ^lt^H^I, 'S^lhFi'S, T®lcni^^< ^ v^?c$? M^3^l7o% ^....^...^.........^..............^.^..^^Q^ -37I^?T TR^ .(^ji^^T)- ^!^r%'R^rw ^? ^^' A P4 IFOTW^fS^,^T^T iislaises represeiitatioii before tlie acconiance-with law. Shri Rakesh Jha, leanie^ submits Uiat if fhe petitioner grievaiices before the respoudent| aiid clecided by him withiii a peri^ in vie~w of tlie submissioit parties, tlie uistaiit petiUoii isj petitioiier to make representat^on detajliiig his grievances raised) petitiouers siibmittmg such rep4 order, tlie same :shall be conspj period of 3 moiiths from the dat( accordaiice with law. respon(|ent No, 2, which shaU be ciecicied hi %^te^ ^iH^l ^ fe^r Ti^^ ^a?f^t^i^T . , couusel appeaiirig for the State akes a fresh rcpresentation for his no. 2, the saine shaU be considered )d of 3 moiitlis thereafter, made by leamed couiisel for the disposed of with tibert^7 to tlie before the respondeut No. 2 ui tlie iiistaiit petitioii aiid 011 ^sentatiou aloug witli a copy of tliis |iered by flie responcleuts witliiii a. ^ of receipt of the represeutation in Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ^\^^^^ ^U^ <M-IKJ!(H—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000.