1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO 6397 of 2009 Date of decision: 4.12.2009 For approval and signature HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH H.PATIL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.U.CHANDIWAL 1. Whether the Reporters of Local Papers Yes/No. may be allowed to see the Judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not ? No 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see No. the fair copy of the Judgment ? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial? No. question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950, or any order made thereunder ? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the No. Civil Judges ? 6. Whether the case involves an important No question of law and whether a copy of the Order should be sent to Bombay, Goa and Nagpur Office ? (A.G. PARALIKAR) Private Secretary agp/office/wp6397-09 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO 6397 of 2009 Abhishek Padmakar Raje, Age 17 years, Occ: Education, Through natural guardian i.e. father Dr.Padmakar Sahebrao Raje, Age: 49 years, Occ: Service as Assistant Commissioner of animal Husbandary, Behind Veterinary Polyclinic Staff Quarter No.1, Mahabal Road, Jalgaon 425 002 ...PETITIONER VERSUS 1. The Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Verification & Scrutiny Committee Nandurbar Through its Member Secretary. 2. Directorate of Technical Education, Maharashtra State, Mumbai. 3. Veer Mata Jijabai Technological College, Mumbai, Matunga, Mumbai 400 019 Through its Director. ...RESPONDENTS ... Mr.Sagar S.Phatale, Adv.,for the petitioner. Mr.U.S.Malte, Standing Counsel, for Respondent no.1 Committee. Mrs. A.V.Gondhalekar, AGP, for respondent State. ... 3 CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & K.U. CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATE : 4th Dec., 2009. ... ORAL JUDGMENT:( Per Naresh H.Patil, J.) 1. Heard. Rule. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties, Rule is made returnable and heard forthwith. 2. The petitioner's caste claim is pending before respondent No.1 Scrutiny Committee. The petitioner is a student of First Year B.Tech. (Electrical) Engineering Course. 3. Learned Counsel for the Scrutiny Committee Mr. U.S.Malte submits that within four months' the petitioner's caste claim would be decided. 4. The petitioner undertakes that he will cooperate with the respondent Committee. The petitioner shall appear before the respondent committee on 14.2.2010, at 11 a.m. 5. For a period of four months the petitioner's admission in respondent no.3 college is protected. The petitioner's admission and performance would be subject to the order to be passed by respondent no.1 Caste Verification Committee. 4 Petition disposed of in above terms. Rule is made absolute accordingly. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) (NARESH H.PATIL) JUDGE JUDGE ... (agp:wp6397-09)