IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 6 OF 2008 V. S. DEMPO AND COMPANY PVT.LTD. ... Petitioner Versus THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX PANAJI ... Respondent Mr. Sudin M. S. Usgaonkar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S. R. Rivonkar, Advocate for the respondent. Coram:- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & SANTOSH BORA, JJ. Date:- 26th August, 2008 P.C. For the reasons set out in the application, the order of the Registrar refusing to register the subject proceedings, stands quashed and set aside, provided the applicant/appellant fulfills the requirement and files a certified copy of the order impugned in the appeal, so also sets out details in regard to its communication. If the compliance is made by Saturday, 30th August, 2008, then, Office to proceed and number the appeal. Civil Revision Application No.5/08 allowed in the above terms and disposed off. No order as costs. S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. SANTOSH BORA, J. ssm.