BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Sixteenth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.14746 of 2011 1 SUDALAIKANNU, 2 NAMBIRAJAN ...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1&3 Vs STATE REP BY ITS THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NANGUNERI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI. (CRIME NO.295 OF 2011) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. N.MOHIDEEN BASHA Advocate For Respondent : Mr.C.RAMESH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 418, 465,468, 471 and 420 of I.P.C. in Crime No.295 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police. They have approached this Court for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2.Heard Mr.N.Mohideen Basha, learned counsel for the petitionres and Mr.C.Ramesh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners has made an endorsement not pressing this Petition for the present in so far as the first petitioner is concerned. 4.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this petition is dismissed in respect of the first petitioner. 5.In respect of the second petitioner, the learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that this Court has granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners 2 and 4, dated 21.09.2011 in Crl.OP(MD)No.12542 of 2011 and the fotting of A-3 is similar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ to that of A-2 and A-4 and therefore, he would request for the grant of anticipatory bail. 6.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the case is pending investigation and there are allegations against this petitioner also. 7.Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the second petitioner, of course, subject to certain stringent conditions. 8.Accordingly, the second petitioner is directed to be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the Judicial Magistrate concerned on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate , Nanguneri, Tirunelveli District and on further condition that the second petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks for the purpose of interrogation. 9.The second petitioner shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 16/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NANGUNERI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NANGUNERI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI +1. CC to M/S. N.MOHIDEEN BASHA Advocate SR.No.40070 rl/6c – 21.11.2011 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14746 of 2011 Date :16/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/