1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 400 OF 2007 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 400 OF 2007 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 400 OF 2007 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2224 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 2224 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 2224 OF 2006 Borivli Education Society. .. Petitioner. vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr. Rajiv Patil for Petitioner. Ms. Geeta Shasstri, AGP., for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Ms. A.K. Savla for Respondent nos.3 to 5. Mr. Puniwala i/by Y.R. Shah for applicant. CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & K.K. TATED, JJ. K.K. TATED, JJ. K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE: 29TH AUGUST, 2008. DATE: 29TH AUGUST, 2008. DATE: 29TH AUGUST, 2008. P.C. . The applicant claims to be impleaded as party respondent on the ground that the applicant is the proposed society of slum dwellers who were on the subject plot. In our view, it is not necessary that the applicant be impleaded in the petition as party respondent as nothing prevents the applicant proposed 2 society to approach the respondents and agitate their claim for rehabilitation if they are otherwise eligible in accordance with the policy of MCGM. With these observations, the chamber summons is dismissed with liberty. No order as to costs. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (K.K. Tated J.) (K.K. Tated J.) (K.K. Tated J.)