HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.24144 of 2006 Date: 12-02-2007. Between : Smt.Leela Agarwal. …..Petitioner And The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, IDA Gandhinagar Circle, Hyderabad & another. …..Respondents. HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.24144 of 2006 ORDER : (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Bilal Nazki) Heard learned counsel for the parties. The grievance of the petitioner is that the notices demanding tax have been issued to the Directors of the Company and not the Company which is in existence. In reply to these assertions, in the counter aﬃdavit, it has been stated that notices sent to the dealer-Company to the address furnished in the Registration Certiﬁcate, were returned unserved, therefore, they were sent to the dealer at the address of its Directors at relevant time. These notices were issued in the name of the dealer- Company only and not to the individual Directors. In view of the stand taken by the respondents in the counter aﬃdavit that no notices have been given to the individual Directors and only notices were given to the Company and the notices have been sent to the individual Directors as the Company could not be served at its known address, we do not think any orders are necessary to be passed in this writ petition, which is accordingly dismissed. _______________ BILAL NAZKI, J 12th February 2007. _____________________________ ajr NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J