IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6870 of 2009 MUKUTDHARI RAM S/O LATE PARMESHWAR RAM, R/O VILLAGE- LAKHOCHAK,P.S.,- CHANAN, DISTRICT- LAKHISARAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.8160 of 2009 UMESH SHARMA S/O LATE JANKI SHARMA, R/O VILLAGE- LAHNA, P.S.- KARANDE, DISTRICT- SHEIKHPURA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 01/05/2009 Above noted applications arising out of one occurrence i.e. Ariari P.S. Case No. 128 of 2008 have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The petitioners are accused of a case which has been registered under sections 420, 409/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners are accused of a case registered under sections 420, 409/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner Mukutdhari Ram was advanced to the tune of Rs. 98,260/- whereas petitioner Umesh Sharma was advanced to the tune of Rs. 2,09,834/- but they have not completed the work. Argument of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that they are ready to deposit the amount in the exchequer. Considering the aforesaid submissions, the petitioners above named of both the cases are directed to be released on bail on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of the C.J.M./concerned Court, Sheikhpura in connection with Ariari P.S. Case No. 128 of 2008 with condition that before furnishing of bail bonds they have to file the receipt before the court below showing the deposit of the amount aforesaid in exchequer which were advanced to them. It is made clear that depositing the amount in exchequer will not prejudice the defence of the petitioners and if the prosecution will not succeed in its case then the amount deposited by the petitioners will be returned to them by the order of the court below. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)