IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26723 of 2009 1. SUDIN RAVIDAS 2. URMILA DEVI -------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR 2 25.8.2009 Heard Counsels for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the complainant. Case has been instituted for offences under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Counsel for the petitioners submits that on account of financial disparity in between the family of the complainant and the petitioners, the complainant is not ready to live at the matrimonial home and she is residing at her parent’s place. A false case has been instituted under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code just to malign petitioners image in the Society. Considering these facts, the prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the above named petitioners is allowed. Let them surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in Complaint case No. 1266 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Mridula Mishra, J.) A.Kumar