IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 30TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 35727 of 2010(M) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- A.M.ABRAHAM, S/O. MATHEW, ADAPPOOR, EDAVETTY, THODUPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.P.RAMAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, IDUKKI-685 584. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, THODUPUZHA-685584. 3. VIJAYAKUMAR, S/O. RAJAPPAN NAIR, MANAPPATTU HOUSE, VENGALLOOR KARA, KUMARAMANGALAM VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA-685 584. 4. K.S.SURESH KUMAR @ AJI, S/O. SIVASANKARAN NAIR, KANDATHUMMATTEL HOUSE, VENGALLOOR KARA, KUMARAMANGALAM VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA-685 584. R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 35727 of 2010 ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 30th day of November, 2010 J U D G M E N T What is under challenge in this writ petition is an interim order passed by the first respondent. 2. In my view, this writ petition is premature and is not maintainable. Petitioner has to appear before the first respondent, contest the matter and, if the order is adverse, seek his remedies before the appellate authority. It is by passing all these, the writ petition is filed. Therefore, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition. Writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge