IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.28604 of 2009 RAMADHAR SINGH, son of Late Hari Ballav Singh, R/o Village – Anand Golwa, P.S. - Mohiuddin Nagar, Distt. – Samastipur …. Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ……………………..…. Opposite Party. ----------- For the Petitioner:- Mr. Chandra Bhushan Das, Advocate. For the State:- Mr. R.P.S. Singh, A.P.P. For the Informant:- Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate. ----------- 4. 07.12.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner files a supplementary affidavit. Let the same be kept on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Informant. Petitioner is accused in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 313, 498 A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the D.P Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that from the first information report it would appear that there were some differences between the informant - wife and the husband on account of pregnancy of the wife and the husband, who was living in Mumbai, had insisted the informant over phone for termination of pregnancy and he had also asked his parents (in-laws of the informant) to get the pregnancy of the informant 2 terminated. It is further submitted that the mother-in-law of the informant, who is also a co-accused in this case, has already been granted anticipatory bail vide order dated 16.11.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 33368/2009. Learned counsel further submitted that from perusal of the Doctor’s prescriptions and report, appended to as Annexures – 2, 3 & 4 to the aforesaid Cr. Misc. No. 33368/2009, it would appear that the allegation of forcible termination of pregnancy of the informant is falsified. Learned counsel for the informant submitted that there are allegations of torture and forcible termination of pregnancy of the informant against both the mother-in-law and the father-in-law of the informant as well as the husband. Learned counsel for the State also submitted that there are specific allegations against the father-in- law and the mother-in-law. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the petitioner, Ramadhar Singh to be released on bail on his furnishing bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like 3 amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Nalanda P.S. Case No. 13 of 2009, G.R. No. 444 of 2009. It is also made clear that if the petitioner, after his release in this case, misuses the privilege of bail in any manner, it would be open for the informant to move the court concerned for cancellation of the bail bonds of the petitioner. dk ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J. )