1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 865 OF 2010. M/s. Ashok Prakashan Pvt. Ltd. -: VERSUS :- Divisional Commissioner, Amravati and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JULY 19, 2010. Heard Shri Pradeep Marpakwar, learned counsel for petitioner, Shri Sonare, learned A.G.P. for respondent no.1 and Shri V.V. Naik, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 and 3. Challenge is to orders passed under Section 267- A of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samiti Act, 1961. I have heard Shri Marpakwar, learned counsel for quite some time. He states that the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the present Writ Petition with liberty to approach the competent Civil Court in the matter. He states that, adverse findings in the order of respondent no.1 however, should be quashed and set aside. 2 Learned A.G.P. is opposing the said request. I find that the observations made by respondent no.1 are in jurisdiction available to him under Section 267-A of the Act and the same will not be binding on the Civil Court. The petitioner can point out to the Civil Court the exact arrangement made and also how it was legal and valid. Hence with liberty to petitioner to file Civil Suit in accordance with the law, present Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn. No costs. JUDGE Rgd.