CRIMINAL MISCELLANIOUS No.12749 OF 2001 In the matter of an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. SUJIT KUMAR CHOUDHARY, SON OF BRAJENDRA PRASAD CHOUDHARY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAMPUR, P.S. AMARPUR, DISTRICT BANKA, PRESENTLY POSTED AS OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, NAWADA, P.S. ARA, DISTRICT BHOJPUR. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. SUNIL KUMAR PANDEY, SON OF BAIJNATH PANDEY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAHULI BUJURG, P.S. UDWANTNAGAR, DISTRICT BHOJPUR. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OPPOSITE PARTIES For the petitioner :- Mr. Sourendra Pandey, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Matloob Rab, A.P.P. For the O.P. :- Anil Kumar Dwivedi, Advocate P R E S E N T THE HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT. SHEEMA ALI KHAN S.A. Khan, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant. 2. The co-accused of Complaint Case No. 991(C) of 1999 have filed a quashing application against the order dated 6.1.2001, passed in Cr. Rev. No. 269 of 2000. The complainant had challenged in revision the order dated 28.11.2000 by which the complaint case has been dismissed. 3. Two different quashing applications had been filed in this Court. Cr. Misc. No. 9990 of 2001 and the present quashing application. The ground raised on behalf of the petitioner in both the quashing applications is that they were not made party by the Sessions Judge who passed an order to their detriment in the revision application. 2 4. This Court while considering all aspects of the matter has remanded the case back to the Sessions Judge for rehearing the matter after appearance of the parties. The present application would be covered by the order passed in Cr. Misc. No. 9990 of 2001, disposed of on 16.8.2010. 5. This application is thus, disposed of. Patna High Court, 17th of January, 2011, N.A.F.R./Sanjay ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)