WP(C) 2526/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. GOSWAMI Heard Mr. NN Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. RK Bora, l earned Additional Senior Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of the respond ent Nos. 1 to 4. The office note, dated 14-11-2011 indicates that notices on the responde nt Nos. 5 and 6 have been duly served. None appears for the respondent Nos. 5 and 6. Mr. NN Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner makes a very limited subm ission. His grievance is that he is a person interested in LA Case No. 6 of 2009 and he had filed an objection under Section 5A of the Land Acquisition Act, 189 4, before the Deputy Commissioner, Kamrup at Amingaon, on 07-12-2010, but the sa me has still not been considered. Mr. Jha, learned counsel submits that the peti tioner will be satisfied if a direction is given to the aforesaid authority to c onsider and dispose of the said objection, in accordance with law. Mr. RK Bora, learned State counsel, in view of the extremely limited pra yer of the writ petitioner, does not object to the submissions advanced by the l earned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, this writ pet ition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 2 to pass appropriat e orders on the objection, dated 07-12-2010, filed under Section 5A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The writ petition stands disposed of.