IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 21238 of 2011 Date of Decision: November 16, 2011 Tarlochan Singh Sethi Advocate …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present: Mr. Fariad Singh Virk, Advocate for the petitioner. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. 1. After arguing some time, learned counsel for the petitioner requests for withdrawal of the writ petition. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn as it is a frivolous petition. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (RAJIV NARAIN RAINA) JUDGE November 16, 2011 Atul