IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15527 of 2009 M/S RUNGTA ENTERPRISES Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS with CWJC No.15557 of 2009 M/S RUNGTA ENTERPRISES Versus THE UNION OF INDIA ORS ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Suraj Samdarshi,Advocate For Respondent Nos.2 to 7: Mr. Satish Kumar Sinha,Advocate For Union of India: Mr. Satya Prakash Tripathi,CGC. --- 6. 28.6.2010 The matter has come up under the heading “For Orders” for consideration of I.A. No.2095 of 2010 and I.A. No.2094 of 2010. The said interlocutory applications have been filed by the petitioner for stay of the tender notice dated 16.2.2010 by which tender has been invited for construction/repair and maintenance of Road Package No.BR-06/22, apart from other road packages, which the petitioner claims to have already completed and the same is the subject matter of dispute in both the writ petitions. However, Mr. Suraj Samdarshi, learned counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the said tender no one came forward with respect to the said road packages and thus both the interlocutory applications have become infructuous. - 2 - In the above circumstances, both the interlocutory applications ( I.A. Nos. 2095/2010 and 2094/2010 ) are disposed of as infructuous. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up on merit. It is pointed out by learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 to 7, National Building Construction Corporation Ltd. that earlier also similar matters have been disposed of by this Court on the fact being pointed out that in terms of clause 24 of the general bid document, there is mechanism for redressal of grievances/ objections of the contractors being referred to the Empowered Standing Committee and this Court, accordingly, did not interfere under its writ jurisdiction in the matter and directed the petitioner to approach the said authority accordingly. In the above circumstances, both the writ applications are also disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondent authorities by invoking clause 24 of the general bid document and the respondent-authorities shall ensure that the case of the petitioner is placed before the Empowered Standing Committee, which shall consider and dispose of the matter within a - 3 - period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order along with a copy of the application filed by the petitioner. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J. )