HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR CONTEMPT CASE (Ct No. 61 of 2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^' Bali Ram Chaurasia, s/o Shri Chaitu Ram, aged about 52 years, Head Master in the Government Girls Middle School, Surangpani Block, Pathalgaon, Distt. Jashpur (C.G). Vs. S. K. Choudhary, s/o not known, aged about 40 years, Block Education Offlcer, Pathalgaon, District Jashpur (C.G). D. D. Pathak, s/o not known, aged about 52 years, Principal, Government Girls High School, Ludeg, Distt. Jashpur (C.G). CONTEMPT PETITION UNDBR SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT. 1971 READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Ap^pearance: Mr. M. K. Sinha, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Arun Sao, Counsel for the respondents. ORAL ORDER (24.02.2010) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J, Heard. Petitioner Bali Ram Chaurasia has filed this petition for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for the alleged default committed in compliance of the order dated 29.09.2008 passed by this Court in W.P(S) No.5465/2008. This Court while disposing of the said writ petition on 29.9.2008 / passed the following orders: <(In view of the aforesaid submissions of the parties, the instant petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a detailed representation before the Competent Authority of the respondents, within 15 days from today, raising all his grievances raised in this petition. On such representation being made, the Competent Authority shall consider and decide the same on its own merits, in accordance with 1. 1 ' Contempt Case (C) No.61/2009 law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of such representation/' Mr. M.K.Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that after passing of the said order, a representation (Annexure C-2), was submitted by the petitioner making prayer for payment of salary from December 2007 to October, 2008. Mr. Sao, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that after receiving the representation of the petitioner in the month of October, a memo was issued to him on 07.11.2008 for giving application relating to leave ete., for deciding his case. He submits that the copy of the said memo has been filed by the petitioner himself as Anexure C-4. He submits that thereafter by taking a decision on the claim made by the petitioner in his representation dated 21.10.2008 the entire payment ofdues admissible in law has been made to the petitioner and a detailed order in this regard has been issued on 11.11.2008. In support of his oral submissions, he furnishes a copy of the order dated 11.11.2008 in this regard. Copy of the said order be made part of the record. In view of the above, I am not inclined to proceed further in the matter. There appears to be substantial compliance of the order dated 29.09.2008 passed by this Court. The proceedings of contempt, therefore, are dropped at this stage. ^^___——— [ Sd/- SunU Kuniar Sinha