HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 1243 or zoos gETmONER : Smt Archma Sam W/o smi Makeudm Kumar Sahu, age about 42 years, Assn. Teacher, Govt Primary School, Kumhaxda, Block Nagi, Dism Dhamtari (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS : LState Govt. of Chhaiiisgarh through Secretary, Education ‘ & Tribal Department DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2.Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department Distt. Dhamtari (CG). 3.Block Education OEcer, Nagari (CG), Distt. Dhamtari (CG). 4.Treasury, Accounts & Pension Distt. Dhamtari (CG). (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon‘ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present : Shri Somkant Verrna, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 26 of February, 2008) 1. Lieanwd counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submits that the fact and question of law involved in the present Writ Petition are the same to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bhardwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another {2%, ' MPJR-CG96}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 03.0443/006 and the order dated 07.02.2007, passed by this Court in W.P (S) No. 697 of 2007 (A.N.V. Satyanarayan & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others). 2. In subsequent cases, i.e. Writ Petition (S) No. 4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kmnar Verma Vs. The State of Chlmttisgarh and another) and other connected matters, decided by this Court on 15.12.2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28.01.1995, issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Diploma in Education Examination, it was clarified that the nomenclature of the Basic Training Institute i.e. B.T.I. has been changed and renamed as Diploma in Education i.e. D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by ft an, i‘, \ ; the decision in Wn't Petition (S) No. 4130 of 2005 (Goposh Kumar Verma Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh and another) (Supra). . ccordingly, the Writ petition is allowed in terms ofthe order passed in the L A ase of YashWant Kumar Bhardwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Burg ‘ nd another (Supra) and‘W.P.(S) No. 697 of 2007 (Supra), subject to , rification-of the facts asto whether the petitioner has acquired D.Ed . Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and mrther wheiher he has been paid two avance increments or not. NO order asto‘costs. d Sdl- ‘ ‘ v Satish K. Agniiio’tri \ Judge / c 'a ve