Wm rang mag mm we We Law“ V? aN M/ W$~ G3 .. m THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP. [c1 No.4 5’1 212011 i WRIT OF INDIA PETITION FOR UNDER ISSUANCE ARTICLE OF APPROPRIATE 226(OF 429 THE WRIT(WRITSz CONSTITUTION ORDER/ORDERS, DIRECTION /DIRECTIONS ETC L PETITIONER : Mahendra Singh Son of late Singh, aged about 49 years, Infront of Jute Mill Gate, Banjin Raigarh, Tahsil 8r, District (C.G.} t RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1) \ Municipal Corporation, Raigarh, y Through its Commissioner Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) Collector, Raigarh, Distu'ct RESPONDENTS Municipal Corporation, Raigarh & Another (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present a Ms Hamida Siddiqui, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate for the respondent No.1. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State. Gowri M i ORDER {ORAL} (Passed on this 11‘ day of August, 2011) 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 submits that the representation dated 2~8e2011 filed by the petitioner will be considered and decided, in accordance with law and on its own merits. within a period of three weeks. ln view of the above, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/—' Satish K. Agnihotgr‘i’ Judge ‘ .1 , HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION C NO.4542 OF 2011 PETITIONER Mahendra Singh