Leai‘ned counsei appearing fer the petitianer submits the? inspite of compiainis made by the petiéioner against ihe {espondents Na. 3 and 4. the Poiice autharities have not taken any action. Thus, the Poiice Gfficers are not taking any interest in the matter and net proceeding with the compiainte m” the petiiioner. 2) in this regard, iaw is very ciear. if the Poiice Siatieri ‘is not. recording the information as referred in sub-section (1) of Seciion.1}54 0f the Code of Criminai Procedure, 19?:3 (for short “the Sr.P.C."), a \ e wWbg HIGH SOUR"? OF CRHIXTWSGARH: BiLIi$PUR Ws'it Petition No 4229 of 2W4 RM F’etétioner Bhaiandas aged about 83 years S/o Late” Sim bamhanc: Habzam, wvénabh' Nagai‘, Raipur. CG” a” Versus 3esagndents 1. State of Chhattisgam, through Semetary to the Dept. of Casperative Sccietées D.K.Singh Bhawan, $ecretaria€, Raipur: (33‘ 2. Deputy Regkstray Cooaeraiive Sociefies Ib Kl ackage,, \ Clhe”;{kne" Il,;aul vim:r,CG. 3. Dr. Choithram Baiaj aged about 65 yeafs, S/c. SM Jeth’anand, L’s. Katora Taiab, Raipur, CG. 4. Rejiv Ceoperative Housing $ociety Ltd (Regsn. Na DRIéPR/go year 82.83; Katara Taiab,’ lRiaipur, through we President Dr. Choithram 8am}. Katm‘a Taiab, Raipur, CG. (Wr%t Petiiian under Article 226 and 227 oi“ Constitution of indie) 3g: Hon’ble Ffir. Sat§sh K. Agnihcir§, J. Present: Mr" Bhishma KIB§éEf ‘ééiiiis’e'l 'f6k’ihe’ iséfi’t‘ééhérf” Mr. Vinay Harit, Deputy Advaeate Genera for the State Mr. Ashish $m’ana, counSel fer the respondents No. 3 aind 4. ORAL GRDER (Passed on this 19th day a: November, 2993} camplami can be made to the Superin nden’t of Police 0f the 3%strmi cancemed. Even if the Superintendent of Po3ice fails i0 take any action, the compiainant can take recourse t0 provismn of Eection 190 read with Secticn 20G of the Cr.P.C. 3} The Hon’me Supreme Court in the mafia? of Meque Padamsee am ethers Vs. Union Df lndia and others1 hem that “if any persen ie aggrieved by the inactmn of the pelice officiale m registermg the HRS the modahties contained in Section wt) read with Section 2G6 of the Code are to be adopted and observed.” 4) in the matter of Samar! Vast: vs“ $tate of m3. and etheye2, the Hon’bte Supreme Caurt observed as under : t “11....we woutd ttke to state that it a person has a grievance that the police etatten is not registering his FIR under Section 154 Cr.F’.C.,. then he can approach the Superintendent at Peiice under Secticn 154 {3) Cr.P.C., by an apetieatten in writing" Even if that dees not yieid any satisfactory resuit in the eenee that etthet the FtR te sttt! not registered, or that even after registenhg it no propet investigation ie netd, it is open to the aggrieved person to fiie an apotication under Section 156 (3) €r.P.C., before the teamed Magistrate concerned, If such an appttoation under Section 156 (3) ie tited before the Magistrate the Magistrate can direct the FIR to he registered and aiso can direot a proper investigation to be made, in" a case where, according to the aggrieved eerson, no proper inveetigation was made The Magistrate can alao under the same provision monitor the investigation to ensure a proper investigation. -‘¢.‘,‘ R2000 u ego m 2 (2008) 2 soc 4o9 17. m our optnion ticm 156 (3} CRRC. ‘is wide eneu’gh to inmude 3%} such powers in a Magistxate which are necessary far ensuring a preper investigation; and ii inckude$ the pawer ta arder registratéan ou‘ an FJR. and 5f Ordering a proper Envestigatmn if the Mag§strate ia satis€ied that a preper investigatian has not been dcne, or i3 not being dune by the potice. Snction 156 (3) CLEO, though briefty worded1 in our opinicm, is very wide and it wiii inciude aii such incideniai pawers as am necessary fer ansuring a pmper investiga‘iion.” 5) Sufficient safeguards are provided in the Cr.P.C., iherefare, if any, grievance exists the petitioner may approach i’irstiy, the Superintendent of Poiice ef the District concerned and; thereafter; t9 the Court 9f Judicial Magistrate under ihe provisions of Seciion 190 read with Sections 200 to 203 and other provisions of the Cr.i3.C.7 if Poiioe is not regisfering FIR on the compiaint of the petitioner. b‘) in View of the above, without expressing any opinion on ihe merits of the case, the petition stands; disposed of, ?} Consequentiy, M.(W.)P‘No.4598 of 2OG4 aiso stands disposed of. Sdl- J ' Sansh K. Agnihotrin‘i’ ’ udge c