IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.169 of 2011 RANI KUMARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 21.6.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Irrespective of the merits of the matter or background which led to the action taken against the petitioner who happens to be Anganbari Sevika, the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner seems to be correct that neither the District Magistrate, Jamui has complied with the guidelines and the direction issued by the State Government in the matter of taking action of removal against the petitioner nor has the appellate authority who is the Divisional Commissioner, Munger in any manner applied himself to the issue as both the orders are non-speaking orders and do not provide materials based on which the conclusion could be reached. Both Annexures 1 and 2 dated 2.2.2010 and 21.7.2010 respectively are hereby quashed on the technicality of law that the District Magistrate has failed to pass a speaking order which is required to be done in the matter of removal of Anganbari Sevika. This writ application is allowed. Matter is remanded back to District Magistrate, Jamui for fresh consideration. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)