y^ iinsstt KfcNGH 0^- <p IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR (C.G.l WRIT PETITION N0. (Sl S & l^ 12,009 PETITIONER : ^ Ojha Ram Sahu, S/o L.R. Sahu, aged about 54 years, working as Upper Division Teacher, at Govt. Middle School, Borsi, Distt. Durg; R/o. ward No. 53, village- Potiakala, Post Hanoda, District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ..•' 16~ .-•i'c'<y ' x^-^^ ^^x^y ^•••'^A" /W -^' (^' / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through- the Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^2, The Directorate of Public Instructions Chhattisgarh, through its Director, Raipur (C.G.) ^3. The District Education Officer, Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G.) » \ ^4. The Block Education Officer, Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT. ORDER, ^ OR/AND DIRECTION IN THE NATUREOF MANDAMUS / ^A\ CERTIORARI, OR QZANY OTHER.A^PROPRIATE^NATURE, 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: As shown in the cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS As shown in the cause title. HSGH COURT OF CHHATTiSQARH : BiLASPUR WRIT PETiTiON (S', N0.4315 OF 2008 PETITiONER Smt. Jitender Lamba Versus Staie of Chhattisgarh & Others RESPONDENTS And ^A W.P.(S) Nos.5881, 5448, S450, 54S1, 5483, 5484, 5485,5584,5758, 5785, 5793,5805,S813, 581S, 5819, 5S20,5S2S,583S,5889,58SO, 5891, 6018, 60S4,62C4,S339,63.tt,S423, 8438, 5290, 5S18, S533, 5578, 5S11, 5SS1, 5S91,5811,53-i 7, 5927, 5930,S521 &SS22 of 2009. (Vtfrit Petitions under Articie 226 of the Constitution of indial Singie Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. AgnihoSri, J. Present:- Shri H.B. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Ms Meera J'aiswai, Shri P.P. Sahu, Shri Mateen Siddiqui, Shri P.R. Patankar, Shri i^anoj Faranjape, Shri Uttam Pandey, Shri C.J.K. Rao, Shri Roop Naik, Shri A.S. Rajput, Shri K.S. Pawar, Shri Ajay Shriv'astava, Shri R.R. Soni, Shri V.K. Pandey and Shri Ashwani Shukia, Advocates for the respective petitioners. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, Dy. Advocaie Generai for the State of Chhattisgas-h and its authoritses. ORDER{ORALi (Passed on this 12ih day ofNovember, 2008) 1. With the consent of learned counse! appearing for the parties, the petitions are heard finaiiy. 2. in thas batch of matters it has been brouyht to the notice of ths Court that the transfer orders have been passed without compiying with the policy and in some cases the orders having been executed aiso require reconsideration. 3. ' Shri Thakur, iearned Dy. Advocate General appearing for the State, on instructioi~>s, very rairiy submiis that ati the cases of the petitioners pending consideration before this Court shait be considered afresh, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the oarties concerned. to examine asto whether the transfer ® Gowri orders have bsen passsd in accordance with the policy and tiii that tinie the petitioners herein shai! not be disturbed. in vjew offoregoing, according to iearnsd counse! appearing for the respective petitioners nothing survives sn these petitions for adjudication. Accordingiy, the pstitions being W.P. (Sj Nos.4315, 5931, 5448, S4SO,54S1, 5483, 5484, 54S5, 5S84,5756, 5785, S7S3, 5805, 5813. 581S,5818, 5820,582S, 5833, 5889,5890, S891, 6018, S094,S204, S339,6340, 6423, 6438, 5280, 5518, 5533, S578, 5611,5861,5631, 5811, 5317, 5327, 5930, SS21 & £822 of 2&09 are disposed of. However, on the basis of submission macie by the iearned Dy. Advocaie Generai, 'it Is made eiear that the petitioners herean shail continue on iheir respective places of posting, as obtains today, tiil disposai offheir respective cases, in accordance with iaw and on its own merits. No order asto costs. „ ^-•''' SdA Satish K. Agiiihoti'i ^ ——Jndgf ^s^ 1u— -I—