:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2491 OF 2005 Eknath Shivram Pitambare & ors. ... Applicants versus State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ... Mr.N.N. Gawankar with Mr. Arfan Sait, for the Applicants. Mr.K.V. Saste, A.P.P., for the Respondent. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 20th April 2005 P.C.: . Heard Counsel for the parties. Learned A.P.P. fairly accepts that the Applicants are entitled for parity along with the Applicants in Criminal Application No. 2435 of 2005 who have been released on bail by this Court’s order dated April 12, 2005. Accordingly, this application succeeds on the following conditions. :2: (A) The Applicants are directed to be released on bail in connection with CR.No.I-96 of 2004 registered with Kalyan Taluka Police Station on executing personal bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand only) each with one or two local sureties in the like amount. (B) The Applicants shall not influence the prosecution witnesses or tamper with the prosecution evidence in any manner whatsoever. (C) The Applicants shall not enter Thane District during the pendency of the trial, except for attending Court cases on the specified dates. (D) The Applicants shall inform their places of residence to the investigating officer as well as the trial Court within one week from the date of release. In addition, the Applicants shall report to :3: the nearest police station, once in a month on first Satuirday of every English Calendar month between 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. (E) The Applicants shall extend full co-operation to the trial Court for early disposal of the trial. If the trial Court is of the opinion that the Applicants are responsible for the delay of the trial, that opinion be recorded in the roznama, which can be a ground for cancellation of bail. . Application disposed of on the above terms. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)