WP(C) 3188/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Mr. AM Barbhuya, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. RK Bora, learn ed State Counsel, Assam. For the order, which I propose to pass, it is not considered essential to issue formal notice. In challenge is the order dated 03.06.2008 passed by the Director, Social Welfar e, Assam, Guwahati, transferring the petitioner from Lala ICDS Project to Katlic hera ICDS Project and one dated 16.07.2009 issued by the CDPO, ICDS Project, Lal a, Hailakandi, releasing her pursuant thereto. The petitioner being aggrieved, had submitted a representation before the District Social Welfare Officer, Haila kandi on 17.07.2009 seeking his intervention and her retention at Lala ICDS Proj ect. The same has been forwarded to the Director of Social Welfare, Assam, Uzan bazar, Guwahati on 23.07.2009. According to the petitioner, the representation remains unattended as on date. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on a consideration of the m aterials on record, this Court is of the view, having regard to the constricted scope of interference in matters of transfer that it would be expedient that thi s petition is closed with a direction the Director of Social Welfare, Assam, Uza nbazar, Guwahati to pass appropriate order(s) to the petitioner’s aforementioned representation. Ordered accordingly. As the representation had been submitted on 17.07.2009, the afor ementioned authority would decide on it within a period of ten (10) days from th e date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. The petition stands disp osed in the above terms. No costs