IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 11726 of 2008. Decided on: 24 th December, 2010. Jagdish Chand. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________________ __ For the petitioner. : Mr. T.S. Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. T.S. Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 24, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.