IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3415 of 2010 Date of Decision: September 16, 2010 Bhinder Singh. …Petitioner Versus Avtar Singh and another … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Anil Kumar Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mohd. Yusaf, Advocate, for the respondent. Alok Singh, J. In the present petition, the question involved is as to whether in a suit for specific performance of the contract impleading the subsequent purchaser from the vendor, after the agreement to sell in question, plaintiff is required to pay C.R.3415 of 2010 Court fee on the consideration shown in the sale deed executed by the vendor in favour of the third party? The issue has already been decided by this Court vide judgment dated 27.08.2010 in Civil Revision No. 5416 of 2010, “Parsan Kaur vs. Balbir Kaur and others”. In view of the judgment passed by this Court in Parsan Kaur’s case (supra), present petition shall stand disposed of in the same terms. September 16, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2