THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA WRIT PETITION NO.3482 OF 2008 ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice B.Prakash Rao) Heard the learned Government Pleader for Services II and Sri G.Vidyasagar, learned counsel for the contesting respondent. At their request, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for disposal when the application for vacate stay came up for hearing. The only grievance of the petitioners is against granting directions for considering the case of the applicant by relaxing the Rules and to continue in the mean while. The main contention urged is that since the applicant has not acquired requisite qualifications; the question of continuance or consideration thereof does not arise. Hence, the Writ Petition. Having heard on either side and on perusal of the material available on record, it is to be seen that the direction given by the Tribunal is to consider and continue, which itself does not create any vested right to seek appointment or continuance as such unless and until the applicant is qualified with the requisite qualifications. Learned Government Pleader for Services II pointed out that till today, the applicant did not acquire the requisite qualifications. All these are matters necessarily to be taken into consideration at the time of considering the representation filed by the applicant. In the circumstances, the Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty to the applicant to file representation, which would be considered by the authorities concerned in proper perspective after verifying the compliance with the requisite qualifications or acquiring thereof and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law. No costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) ________________ (B.N.RAO NALLA, J) 11th April 2011 RRB