SBCWP NO.7265/09. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R 1) S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.7265/2009. Kaila Kumar Paliwal Versus State of Raj. & Anr. 2) S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.8765/2009. Shyam Manohar Sharma Versus RPSC 3) S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.7241/2009. Rakesh Kumar Meena Versus State of Raj. & Anr. 4) S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6186/2009. Govind Narain Versus State of Raj. & Ors. 5) S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6188/2009. Shyam Lal Versus State of Rajasthan & Anr. Date of order:- July 22, 2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Tanveer Ahmed and Shri Manish Kumar Sharma for the petitioners. Shri S.N. Kumawat, Additional Advocate General. ***** BY THE COURT:- All these writ petitions have been preferred with the common grievance that the respondents have not published the answer keys of the preliminary examinations and therefore it cannot be accepted that the assessment made of their answer-keys of the preliminary examinations is correct and further that even if there is a slight SBCWP NO.7265/09. 2 inaccuracy in regard to assessment of answers given by the petitioners, this may make a lot of difference. This argument is raised in the context of one of writ petitioner, Rakesh Kumar Meena on the ground that he secured 223.71 marks in the preliminary examinations whereas cut off marks in his category is 223.77. It is not known as to how many candidates are there in between 223.71 marks secured by petitioner-Rakesh Kumar Meena and 223.77 cut-off marks, particularly when, examinations are scheduled to take place on 25/7/2009. If what is contended is accepted that the answer keys unless notified, candidates who have failed in the preliminary examinations should be given the facility of appearing in the main examinations till it is established to the satisfaction of the petitioners and others, who have failed to qualify the examination, this argument may not be available just and proper to only the petitioners who have approached this court but also for others who could not approach this Court and have failed in the preliminary examination in similar manner. An element of certainty has to be ensured in the selection held. Petitioners have approached this court at a very belated stage. In three of these cases, petitioners approached in May 2009, in other cases during summer vacations and on 30/6/2009 when the courts were re-opened. No efforts were made to SBCWP NO.7265/09. 3 get the cases listed early in point of time. The cases were only listed on 17/6/2009 and thereafter now. At this belated stage, when the main examinations are going to take place on 25/7/2009, no relief can possibly be granted to the petitioners. The writ petitions are dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil