IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18910 of 2010 RAJ KUMAR RAI & ANR. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 13.07.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to withdraw the application for anticipatory bail with regard to petitioner no.1 who has been arrested during pendency of this application. Prayer is allowed. Prayer with regard to petitioner no.1 is dismissed as withdrawn. So far petitioner no.2 is concerned, he is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 307, 323, 324,341, 504, 379/34 of the I.P.C. There is allegation of assault against the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that subsequently the compromise has been filed. Both sides are neighbours. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that it is alleged against the petitioner that he assaulted with Tangi whereas the injury no. ‘a’ is shown to be caused by hard and blunt substance in the injury report. In view of the allegations, I am not 2 inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner no.2. The anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. However, learned court below will not be prejudiced by this order and will consider the regular bail in view of the fact that the matter has been compromised between the parties and the allegations are not being corroborated by the injury report. With this observation, this application is disposed off. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)