IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.7400 of 2010 Date of Decision : April 27, 2010. Bhupinder Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Vivek K.Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner while working as Peon was assigned the duties of Driver in the respondent-department. It is averred that the petitioner is working as such since 30.5.2007 to the entire satisfaction of his superiors. He seeks a mandamus to direct the respondents to grant him the pay scale of driver. In this regard, the petitioner is said to have represented the authorities vide a representation dated 10.2.2010 (Annexure P-2) followed by a letter by the PWD Workers Union dated 20.3.2010 (Annexure P-3) but without any response. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the same with a direction to respondent Nos.2 & C.W.P.No .7400 of 2010 2 3 to look into the grievances of the petitioner and dispose of the afore- stated representation of the petitioner by passing a speaking order, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. April 27, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE