IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33354 of 2009 SUDHIR SINGH, S/O YOGENDRA SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-SUKUL CHAK, P.S.-JEHANABAD (KARAUNA), DISTRICT-JEHANABAD. …………PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …………OPP. PARTY. ----------- 2 16.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Case is under Sections 302 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. However, from the confessional statement of one Sanjay Kumar it transpired that one Abhay Singh had called the deceased to collect juice for preparing toddy and in the evening, when the deceased was coming back, he was shot dead. The confessional statement which is part of the FIR does not show as to who had fired upon the deceased. It also shows that among the accused persons, Abhay Singh was also present at the place of occurrence. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that said Abhay Singh has been allowed bail by this Court vide order dated 17.09.2009 passed in Cr.Misc. No. 28242 of 2009. - 2 - Considering the above facts and especially the fact that said Abhay Singh who had called the deceased and was also present at the place of occurrence has been allowed bail by this Court, this application is allowed. Let petitioner Sudhir Singh be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Jehanabad (Karauna) P.S.Case No. 99 of 2009 with conditions as laid down in sub-section (3) of Section 437 of the code of Criminal Procedure as may be applicable and also that one of the bailors shall be a close relation of the petitioner. In case of breach of any of the conditions at any stage to the satisfaction of the concerned court below it shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner and take steps for his arrest. Arvind/ (J. N. Singh, J.)