HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.1959 and 1958 of 2009 COMMON ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for both sides, and at their request, the revision petitions are taken up for disposal. In these two revision petitions, the petitioners are aggrieved against the order of appointment of commissioner to ascertain the mesne profits in respect of schedule property in terms of the preliminary decree which is admittedly passed. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that having regard to the fact that as against the said decree which is ex parte, the petitioners filed an appeal though with condonation of delay and therefore, these applications could not have been taken up. There cannot be any dispute that though the appeal is filed even without a delay, that itself cannot stall the present proceedings which is only in pursuance of the decree. In the circumstances, I do not find any merits. Accordingly, both the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed. No order as to costs. _________________ Date: 27th October, 2009 B.PRAKASH RAO, J SKM