IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MISC. APPEAL No. / 2011 APPELLANT ^ f' Plaintiff PRI Pre1 Kripashankar Jaiswal, S/o. Late Raninayaran Jaiswal, Aged about 75 years, Caste Jaiswal, R/o. Hajaribag Road, Dislari Lalpur, P.S. Ranchi, Distt. Ranchi, power [No^..^'--"'""R°"p["%%it';l.. of attorney holder son ss-snisd cy ShfiP-—'—"f"^JSantosh Kumar Jaiswal, •""/""~ S/o. Shri Kripashankar Jaiswal, Aged about 50 years, R/o. Bajaribag Road, Lalpur, P.S. Lalpur, Ranchi, Jharkhand. o II 2-' 5 RESPONDENTS Defendants VERSUS _1. ^- 4. 5. 6. ^ Deonaryan Jaiswal, S/o. Late Ram.nayaran Jaiswal, Aged about 73 years, ShaUendra Jaiswal, S/o Late Sangram Singh, Aged about 35 years, Smt. Sarojani Devi W/o. late Girjashankar Jaiswal, Aged about 70 years, Ajay Kumar JaUswal, S/o Late Girjashankar Jaiswal Aged about 48 years, Vijay Kumar Jaiswal, S/o. Gujashankar Jaiswal, Aged about 40 years, AU R/o. Dislari Lalpur, Ranchi, P.S. Lalpur, Distt. Ranchi, Jharkhand. Smt. Pushpa Agrawal, W/o. Shri Arul Kumar Agrawal, aged about 35 years, J< ^ ^- 9. Smt. Vidyadevi W/o. Shri Lal Agrawal, Aged about 60 years, Smt. Jyoti Sinha, W/o. Vimlesh Siaha, Aged about 60 years, Smt. Rekha Devi, W/o. Late Ashok Agrawal, Aged about 50 years, Res. No. 6, 7 &9 are Caste Agrawal, & Res. No. 8 is Caste- Kayastha, AU are R/o. Nagar, Ramanujganj, P.S. & Tahsil- Ramaaujganj, Distt.- Surguja (C.G.) State of Chhatti^arh, Through: CoUector, Surguja (C.G.) MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL UNDER ORDER 39 RULE -MQ^ (^ OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, 19D8 .^ k 3D^[ W R-fi* ^IIT W^\ sbli* ^^ ^ 'S^ -^nicl^, »Til'y<ic, fsKii'Hy ri^...A.ft..Ms;...'l.0..g/J.i......... ^WM vhW<h••-—---—-•••••-•-r-'-'---^ 200 SII^T Traq7 (T3^f3^tr) gww ^itei aii^i <T>i<(i<rr^T "RR^Tf ^? 'fe^ ^•^K. ^sifinsn^i HON'BLE MKJUy 1 ICh N.K. AUAKWAL 09.12.2011: Shri A.N, Pandey, couns ShriSanjeev Agrawal, P Learned counsel appea plaintiff has not admitted bel defendants No. 6 to 9 are in In view of above, he sei to file reviewagainst the order He is permitted to do so. Accordinqlv, the mlsc. the llberty as aforesaid. No isjel for the appellant. 'l- for the State/respondent No.10. 1-ing for the appellant submits that the <ore the Court on 25.4.2011 that the phjysical possession of the suit property. i^ks to withdraw this appeal with liberty jmpugned. oraer kppeal is dismissed as withdrawn with ter as to costs. Sd/- N.K. Agarwai Judge ^ IS^"~~V