1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 432 OF 2010. (DEEPAK NARSINGH REDDY...VS... THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, NAGPUR DN. & ANOTHER..) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Ms. Tajwar Khan, Advocate(Appointed) for Petitioner. Mr. T.A.Mirza, A.P P. for Respondents. CORAM : A.P.LAVANDE AND P.D.KODE, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 18, 2010. Heard Ms. Tajwar Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mirza, learned A.P.P. for the respondents. The grievance made by the petitioner is that, although the petitioner has applied for furlough he has not been communicated the decision taken thereon. The reply filed on behalf of the respondents discloses that the petitioner has been granted furlough but he could not furnish surety, since his brother, who was offered surety, refused to stand as surety and therefore, the petitioner himself requested to file his application with liberty to renew his request whenever he would be able to arrange for surety. In view of above, the grievance made by the petitioner in the petition does not survive. Hence, the petition is dismissed. Needless to mention that the petitioner is at liberty to file fresh application seeking furlough, if permissible in law. 2 Fees payable to Ms. Tajwar Khan, Advocate appointed to appear on behalf of the petitioner are quantified at Rs.seven hundred and fifty only. JUDGE JUDGE RR.