In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 2071 of 2009 Date of decision: April 20, 2009 Des Raj Singh and another .. Petitioners Vs. Sukhpal Singh and another .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Yogesh Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. A.N. Jindal, J The order dated 23.8.2007 striking off the defence of the defendants was passed, against which the present petition has been filed. The petitioners have nothing to say except that the order could be set aside subject to payment of costs, as it is a matter of serious nature and lis regarding 6 kanals and 13 marlas would be adjudicated by the trial court. Heard. Notwithstanding the fact that the petitioner has committed negligence for not challenging the aforesaid order for the last two years. But, it appears that though the petitionees have been appearing before the trial court, yet, their counsel did not disclose about the order and consequences thereof. The meritorious claims cannot be thrown away for the fault on the part of the counsel. As such, this petition is allowed, the impugned order is set aside subject to payment of Rs.10,000/- as costs to be paid on the next date. This petition is disposed of without issuing notice to the respondent with a view to impart complete justice to the parties and to save the huge expenses, which may be incurred by the respondent as also in order to avoid unnecessary delay in adjudication of the matter. Still, if dissatisfied, the respondent may move to this court for recalling this order. April 20, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge