IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 15222 of 2008 Between: B. Ramaiah S/o. B. Padmanabham Osmania Medical College, Koti, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Regional Director of Medical and Health Services, King Koti, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintendent, Gandhi Hospital, Secunderabad. 3 The Director of Health, Sultan Bazar, Koti, Hyderabad. 4 State of A.P. rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Health, Medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 5 G. Krishna O/o. Superintendent, Gandhi Hospital, Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of Writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the order of the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad in O.A. 4951 dated 10.07.2008 and quash the same by declaring the impugned proceedings Rc.No.748/B2/RDH/2008 dated 27.06.2008 of the 1st respondent as illegal, bad and arbitrary and suspend the proceedings Rc.No.748/B2/RDH/2008 dated 27.06.2008 of the 1st respondent pending disposal of the O.A.No.4951 of 2008 on the file of the Andhr Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad and further direct the Respondents to permit the petitioner to join as Senior Assistant in Gandhi Hospital, Secunderabad pursuant to proceedings Rc.No.748/B2/RDH/2008 dated 10.06.2008 of the 1st respondent and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.J.R.MANOHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following : ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) This writ petition is filed questioning the order of the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (for short ‘Tribunal’) in O.A.No.4951 of 2008 dated 10-07-2008. A perusal of the order of the Tribunal would go to show that the Tribunal while admitting the O.A. ordered notice to the respondents returnable in four weeks. Admittedly, O.A. is pending consideration before the Tribunal. In as much as the Tribunal has ordered only notice and no final order has yet been passed on merits by the Tribunal either in the interlocutory application or in O.A., we are not inclined to entertain the writ petition. Suffice it to direct the Tribunal to dispose of the O.A. as expeditiously as possible. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed at the admission stage. _____________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED,J ____________________ C.V.RAMULU,J Dt:16-07-2008 usd