1 33.caw1782.1783.11 ast FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1782 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1783 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3423 OF 2000 _______________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s orders : Court’s or Judge’s Orders _____________________________________________________________________ Mr. Rohit Surwase h/f. Mr. Nitin P. Deshpande, Advocate for Applicants. CORAM : G.S.GODBOLE, J DATED : 15TH SEPTEMBER, 2011. PC :- 1. These Civil Applications are filed by the sons of the deceased original Petitioner for being substituted in place and instead of the Original Petitioner who had died on 5/3/2010. The provisions of Order 22 are not strictly applicable to the proceedings under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India as held by the 2 33.caw1782.1783.11 Supreme Court of India in the case of Puran Singh v/s. State of Punjab 1996 (2) SCC 205. Accepting the justification in paragraph-2,3 and 4, Civil Application deserves to be allowed. There is no delay. For the reasons stated above, the Applicants are allowed to be substituted as Petitioner in place and in stead of the Original Petitioner in the Writ Petition. Both the Applications are allowed. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. (G.S.GODBOLE, J)