Mgn CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.9822 OF 2009 Corporation Bank ...Petitioners Vs. Pune Municipal Corporation & Anr....Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office : Memoranda of Coram, : Court's or Judge's orders appearances,Court 's : orders or directions & : Registrar s orders . : ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. A.B. Shinde, for the Petitioner. Mr. V.S. Masurkar, Govt. Pleader for the Respondent No.2. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : 30th November, 2009. P.C.: Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. Respondent No.1 has been served on 21st October, 2009. The petitioners herein challenge the demand by the respondent for penalty on the ground that octroi was not paid on time. On behalf of the petitioner learned Counsel states that the octroi will be paid within one week from today. Statement accepted. 3. The issue pertains to penalty. The petitioners dispute their liability to pay penalty. The issue is covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Bank of Baroda vs. Pune Municipal Corporation being Writ Petition No. 9343 of 2009 decided on 17th November, 2009. That judgment will apply to the facts of the present case. For the reasons set out in the judgment in Writ Petition No.9343 of 2009 Rule made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)