1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NOs. 1255 OF 2008 Smt. Tulsabai Ramdas Chaware vs. WCL & Ors. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri V.A. Dhabe, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. MARCH 26, 2008. Heard. The petitioner is the wife of deceased employee, who, according to her, had nominated the petitioner for the purposes of receiving all the provident fund amount but Respondent No.1 distributed the provident fund amount to the father and mother of the deceased and also to the petitioner in equal shares on the basis of a certificate issued by Gram Panchayat. The effect was not given to the nomination made by the deceased on the ground that nomination was not available with Respondent No.1, although the document was available. The amounts have already been distributed between the petitioner and father and 2 mother of the deceased, who are not even respondents before us. As such, controversy cannot be sorted out in writ proceedings. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed. However, the petitioner is given liberty to take any other remedy that may be available to her in law. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.