IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO. 21 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 189 OF 2002 SHRI VASSUDEV LAXMAN PEDNEKAR (SINCE DEC) THROUGH LR'S ... Applicant Versus DEPUTY COLLECTOR AND S.D.O, PONDA, GOA AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. S.G. Dessai, Senior Advocate with Mr. A. Gaonkar, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, Senior Advocate with Mr. H.D. Naik, Advocate for the Respondents. Coram:- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 2nd May, 2011 P.C.: Heard Mr. Dessai, the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant. 2. Having heard him at length, we are of the opinion that this Review Petition is not maintainable, because there is no error apparent on the face of the record which requires any correction. The error pointed out cannot be corrected in the limited jurisdiction, in as much as that would require us to peruse the entire record and come to a conclusion whether the deduction, as made, is permissible in law or not. The relief that the Applicant seeks is not capable of being granted in Review jurisdiction. The remedy of the Applicant is to impugn the judgment delivered by the Division Bench by filing the substantive Appeal before the higher Court. 3. The Review Application is therefore devoid of any merits and is accordingly dismissed. S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. F. M. REIS, J. NH