THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU and THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI WRIT APPEAL No. 30 OF 2010 Dated: 24-02-2010 Between: V. Venkat Reddy and eight others ... APPELLANTS AND The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Lakdikapool, Hyderabad ... RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU and THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI WRIT APPEAL No. 30 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Nisar Ahmad Kakru) The learned single Judge has declined indulgence because the appellants have an alternative statutory remedy available. We are in agreement with the view taken. At this stage it is contended by the learned counsel for the appellants that the appellants have filed an application for release of the seized stock which should receive consideration. On the assumption of correctness of the statement, suffice it to say that if the application is maintainable in law, it shall be disposed of by the authority concerned. Disposed of. T. MEENA KUMARI, J NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, CJ 24-02-2010 ks