IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 114 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 26 OF 2009 SHASHIKALA RAIKAR / GAONKAR PRESENTLY UNDERGOING LIFE SENTENCE AT AGUADA CENTRAL JAIL AND ANR., ... Applicants Versus STATE THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ... Respondent Mr. Mahesh Amonkar, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. C. A. Ferreira, Public Prosecutor for the State. Coram:- B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 20th April, 2009 P.C. The appellant no.2-wife, has preferred this application for her release on bail. The learned Counsel for the applicant states that no application was moved during trial as there was no arrangement to furnish security or any surety. 2. Mr. Ferreira, learned Public Prosecutor, points out that the Court has after appreciation of evidence found both appellants guilty and he places reliance of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Kishori Lal v. Rupa & Ors. reported in AIR 2005 (S.C.) 1481. He argued that considerations in the matter at this stage i.e. after conviction, will be different. 3. We find that the appeal itself can be disposed off finally. The learned Counsel for the appellants states that the appellants can file private paper book by the end of May 2009. If the private paper book, is so filed, the Registry to list the appeal for final hearing after second week of its re-opening. 4. The application for grant of bail is dismissed in view of this early hearing granted and also in view of the fact that the appellant no.2 is found guilty after appreciation of evidence in the matter. B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. U. D. SALVI, J. arp/*