IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28237 of 2008 CHUNNU MISHRA @ SHASHI BHUSHAN MISHRA & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 29.08.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant who has appeared on her own and the State. Petitioners are accused in a case registered for the offences under Sections 498A, 341, 323, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted that petitioner no.1 is the maternal father-in-law and petitioner no.2 is the maternal brother of husband of the complainant. It is further submitted that the allegations attributed against the accused persons are general in nature. However, it has been alleged that all the accused persons misbehaved with the father of the complainant and they did some Mar-Pit as also taken the Stree Dhan which was given by her father. Learned counsel for the State as well as the complainant submits that all the accused persons have committed the alleged offence, as such, they are not entitled to privilege of bail. Having considered the submissions, as noticed above, and in the facts and circumstances of the case, it - 2 - is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioners, namely, Chuunu Mishra @ Shashi Bhushan Mishra and Shivdas Mishra be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram in connection with Sanjhauli P.S. Case No. 9 of 2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)