IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 24TH JANUARY 2011 / 4TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 2348 of 2011(P) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- T.G.MATHEWS, NEDUVAMPURATH HOUSE, VINOBA NAGAR, CHILAVNNUR, KADAVANTHARA.P.O.,KOCHI-20. BY ADVS. SRI.P.B.SURESH KUMAR, SRI.K.N.SASIDHARAN NAIR. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF LAND REVENUE, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN-689645. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ADOOR-691 523. 5. DISTRICT SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT, PATHANAMTHITTA-689 645. 6. THE TAHSILDAR, KOZHINCHERRY-689 641. 7. RAHUL MOHAN UNNITHAN, RAKESH BHAVAN, VALLIKODU-KOTTAYAM, PATHANAMTHITTA-689 656. 8. RAJ MOHAN NAIR.P.R., RAKESH BHAVAN, VALLIKODU-KOTTAYAM, PATHANAMTHITTA-689656. 9. CHERIYAN.K.G., S/O. LATE GEORGE, KADAMMATHU HOUSE, POOVAMPARA, KONNI P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA-689 691. 10. M.G. PHILIPOSE, S/O. LATE GEORGE, PUTHUVELIL HOUSE, POOVAMPARA, KONNI.P.O. PATHANAMTHITTA-689 691. Kss ..2/- ...2.... WPC.NO.2348/2011 P 11. JOSE SAMUEL, PUTHENVILAYIL HOUSE, VAKAYAR.P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA-689 698. 12. SALI SAM JOSE, W/O. JOSE SAMUEL, PUTHENVILAYIL HOUSE, VAKAYAR.P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA-689 698. R1 TO R6 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.2348 OF 2011(P) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T The only prayer that is pressed before me is for a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P10, a revision filed by the petitioner under Rule 18 of the Transfer of Registry Rules. 2. Now that such a revision is pending, it is directed that the 3rd respondent shall consider it with notice to the petitioner and respondents 7 to 12 and pass orders thereon. This the 3rd respondent shall do as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 6 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. It is made clear that this court has not expressed anything on the merits of the contentions raised and it is entirely for the 3rd respondent to consider the matter on merit. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :