IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12536 of 2010 RAJ KUMAR SAH, S/o Mishri Sah. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 26.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 279 and 304A of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that for misuse of privilege of bail for a period of about one and half months the petitioner has remained in custody since 29.01.2010, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Mahepura in connection with Murliganj P.S. Case No. 22 of 1996 (G.R. No. 165 of 1996) subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on 2 affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same positively within nine months since the matter is of the year 1996. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)