IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.916 of 2005 1.Vinay Kumar Yadav @ Mannu, Son of Late Laxmi Narayan Yadav, R/o Mohalla- Nand Gola(near bangle Per), P.S.- Malsalami, Patna City, District- Patna.— ----------------------------------------Defendant—Petitioner. Versus 1.Kumar Chiranjeev Rai @ Saloo. 2.Kumar Abhijit Rai @ Sonoo. Both 1 and 2 ,Sons of Ravindra Kumar Yadav. All Residents of Bihar Niwas, Station Road, P.S.-Kotwali, District-Patna.-------------------------Plaintiff. 3.Sri Ravindra Kumar Yadav, Son of Late Laxmi Narayan Yadav, Resident of Bihar Niwas, Station Road, P.S.-Kotwali, District-Patna 4.Sri Bijendra Kumar Yadav @ Totoo, Son of Late Laxmi Narayan Yadav. 5.Smt. Shushila Devi, Widow of Late Laxmi Narayan Yadav. 6.Smt. Prem Lata Devi, Widow of Late Gajendra Prasad Yadav-- --------------------------------(Performa-Defendant). No.4 to 6, residing at Mohalla- Nand Gola(near Bangla per)P.S.- Malsalami, Patna City, District-Patna. ------------------------------Defendants—Opposite Parties.. ----------- 14. 01.08.2011 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. It appears from the order sheet that on previous occasion also no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner. This civil revision application has already 2 been dismissed against opposite party no.4 due to non compliance of the peremptory order of this Court. This civil revision application arises out of partition suit in which all the parties are necessary parties and the dismissal of the case against some of the parties to this civil revision application has made the entire civil revision application incompetent and as such this civil revision application is dismissed as incompetent. Nitesh ( V. Nath, J.)