1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 863 OF 2010 Nitin S/o Balaji Mukkawar Through G.P.A. Munnasinha G. Tehra .. .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra and others .. .. Respondents Shri A. B. Girase, Advocate for the Petitioner. Smt. V. A. Shinde, A.G.P. for the Respondents No. 1 to 6. CORAM : A. P. DESHPANDE & N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 10TH FEBRUARY, 2010. ORAL ORDER [ PER A. P. DESHPANDE, J. ] : 01. By this petition, the petitioner is seeking quashing of an order dated 27.01.1998, passed by respondent No. 5, whereunder CL-III license of the petitioner's grand father has been transferred in the name of the respondent No. 7. According to the petitioner, his grand father was holding the said license to deal in country 2 liquor and for the purpose of business had engaged services of respondent No. 7 as manager. After the death of the grand father of the petitioner, the said manager in collusion with officers got transferred the license in his name by playing fraud. It is undisputed that some of the legal representatives of the deceased have already filed suit in the Civil Court for declaration that the plaintiffs have right of renewal of license in their names and the respondent No. 7 herein has no right to carry on business under the said license. The very entitlement to operate the license is subjudice before the Civil Court. 02. In that view of the matter, we decline to entertain this petition, as the petitioner has already availed of an alternate efficacious remedy in the form of a suit. Hence, petition is summarily dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to canvass all the points raised in this petition before the Civil Court. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [ A. P. DESHPANDE, J.] bsb/Feb. 2010