1 WP 3309/10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3309 OF 2010 Mr. Satish R. Mishra ...... Petitioner. V/s The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...... Respondents. Mr. A.M. Saraogi for the Petitioner. Mr. P.S. Hingorani, APP for the State. CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. DATE :6th December, 2010 P.C:- 1. This is an application for quashing by consent. Respondent – complainant is present in court. He has also filed his affidavit in reply. He has stated that he has no objection if the complaint is quashed. Investigating Officer also is present in Court. He has also stated that he has no objection if the complaint is quashed. Since the dispute between the parties is a personal one, in view of the judgments of the Apex court in Madan Mohan Abbot vs. State of Punjab1 and in Jagdish Chanana vs. State of Haryana2, in my view, the complaint can be quashed on account of 1 AIR 2008 SC 1969 2 AIR 2008 SC 1968 2 WP 3309/10 settlement between the parties. 2. Criminal Application is accordingly allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and disposed off. V.M. KANADE, J.