1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R M/s Epitome Destinations Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others. S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 2963/2007 ......... Date of Order : 29/05/2008 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR BY THE COURT Mr. Vikram Purohit for the petitioner. By the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order Annex.21 dated 3.5.2007 passed by respondent No.2 Rajasthan Tourism Development Corporation Limited (for short 'the Tourism Corporation' hereinafter). I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Carefully gone through the order impugned Annex.21 dated 3.5.2007. It appears that by the order impugned, the licence granted in favour of the petitioner was cancelled on the ground 2 that the petitioner issued cheques which on being presented to the bank were dishonoured on the ground that the amount in the account holder is insufficient and therefore, for want of sufficient fund the cheques were dishonoured and returned unpaid. Thereafter, various notices were sent to the petitioner to deposit the amount but the petitioner has neither paid the amount by cheque nor in cash. The order impugned is self explanatory and deals with events to the extent that the again and again Tourism Corporation has been asking the petitioner to deposit the amount but the petitioner failed to deposit the same and on that count the licence was cancelled. In the circumstances, therefore, in my view, cancelling of the licence for running a hotel cannot be said to be erroneous in any manner. The writ petition has no force and it is therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. Stay petition also stands dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp