FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.799 OF 1994 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:----------------------------------- Mr I.R.Kulkarni i/b Ms S.M.Takavde, for the petitioner. Ms Nayana Thattle, for the respondents CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATED: 18.09.2006 P.C.: Heard the learned counsel for the parties. This petition is pending for admission since 1994. The impugned order reads thus:- "In Spl Suit 65/83 between the same parties this Court passed orders today only to hear on all the issues instead of same preliminary issues and this suit is to be tried and heard along with Spl.Suit 65/83. Hence issues as proposed as per Exh.74 in this suit be treated as the issues raised in this suit and all the issues be heard along with Spl.Suit 65/83. This is in modification of above order dated 24.7.89." I perused the issues and the other material placed before me. I see no reason to exercise the writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)