(1) WP No.6262/2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6262 OF 2004 Vishwanath Girmaji Gaikwad ] R/o Pimpri-Aughad,Tq.Rahuri] PETITIONER. Dist. Ahmednagar. ] VERSUS The State of Maharashtra ] Through Govt.Pleader, ] High Court of Bombay, ] RESPONDENTS. Bench at Aurangabad ] and others. ] ----- Mr.S.S.Shete, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.K.Tambe, AGP, for respondents No.1. Mr.Pradeep Shahane, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ----- CORAM : Naresh H. Patil and N.D.Deshpande, JJ. DATE : 3rd July, 2009. ORAL ORDER [ PER – NARESH H. PATIL, J.]: 1] Heard. 2] The learned counsel for petitioner submits that under the Government Resolution, dated 19th September, 1975, petitioner is entitled to be awarded pension. According to counsel, the petitioner worked from 2/5/1071 to 14/06/1985 on work-charge basis with the respondent No.2 University and he accordingly retired thereafter. (2) WP No.6262/2004 3] We have perused the Government Resolution referred to above. We find that the services of petitioner were not regularized and in absence thereof the petitioner would not be entitled to claim any pensionary benefits. In view of the settled position of law that such employee whose services were not regularized and was temporary in nature could not claim pensionary benefits at par with the regular employee or an employee selected by following appropriate selection procedure. 4] In exercise of extra ordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, no interference is warranted. 5] Petition stands dismissed. [ N.D.Deshpande,J.] [ Naresh H. Patil,J.] pcr/o/wp6262.04