@ EH§311 CQETRT @E‘ gggigT’EEQARM 1LT EEEASSEER §.E. : HOWBLE £U§TE€E SHRE SATE§§ Eé AGNEEQTRE ‘WRET FETETE§K N0“ 2§8$ OE 294% ?E'E‘§T§®NER Rag'egéra C§18,i1d1‘akar, Aged about 34 yeai‘S, S/o; Manohmial €handrakar, Pmsidem, Chhamsgarh F’sha'ry Coopei‘aiiva Socieiy, TeEibandha Tah & Digtrist Mahasamund (CG) Law VEEISUS RE§FQNBEI 11$ Stave of €hha1$isgaxh EEOugh; Collastm‘, Mahasamupd, District Mahagamumd. zcha {3003361‘aii'va vmage Kuz‘rubhata, Tami! mid '‘: MahaSamLmd (CG) c 3 Lakhanlal, VicemPi'csiden‘i, Jai Mama Bhancha Coapmaihza ' Society, Viliage Kmrubhaia. ‘ Tahsii and District Mahasamund (CG) 4} Chisf Execmiva Offican Jazzpad Pamhayat, Mahasamund, Ta” SIE and District Mahasamund (CG) :3] 'Dimcmr of Pa.:§cha rat ChhaJiSgara, DKS. Bhawan‘, Raipm‘ CG) 6] Janpac‘: Panahayai; Mahagamund! V hkhand & DiSii. Mahammuad (CG) 3Q 4 WRET PETETIGN UNDER ARTECLE 226/227 Q1: THE CGNSTITUTEQN OF ENDEA‘ ?reS€m; Shx‘i Manoi Pamajpe, Aémca’ia for the petitisner. Shi‘i Sashi§ Diibey, GOV/t, Advocaie for tha I‘e‘sywéem no.1 3%: 5‘ Shri, }.A.?,0§‘.a‘ni9 AdV’OCgE £91” rgsmonégm no, éq gmd 3, m Ski Pankaj Shri'vastava, Advocate fm reseoildant no. 4 a0 6, ‘1. .i x ( i S QR$E1€ ,, (Passed 011 2 gv’day of Aprii, 2007) —~5 By this patiticm the pétitimwg; Presidgmj Chhaui$garh FiShm‘y COOperativa Society; Tglibaizdha, DiStzici ivhhagamumi, quasiimw tha lagaiity aiid vahdi’ry of ’the 0}'d@1‘ daiad 05.092005 {Annamw H3} passw by the Chief Executiva Offism; based out 111:3 right 0f iismng 0§ the disputeéi im‘iga‘cian poud m rsspmdem 110. 2 and 3 Society for a pen'od OE 5 years; the ordm‘ datad 13.12.2005 (Annexure 13/8) passad by the Colkcmg Maha3amm1¢ cm$ming tils Older datsd 0509:2005, ag 136mg valifj and pg‘omr am} ordsr daied 12.042006 (Ammxuw 13/1 1) mssed by tbs Diragter, Pamhayat, Whammdar tile ‘ revision 0kg? by the petitiengy was diSmiSiseé holding that 58’89 hactai'e 0f submeyged area of T61iba§dha Irrigation Pond is in Vi§1ag€ Kun‘ubhata amd 7.59 hectare Sabmcrgad aim is ii: Elihggzdha, Both The az‘eas come Wiihén ‘tha periphm‘y 0f 8 KM, Thug, ‘the: gram of lease for iishing righi to ”5:36 raspozldgm no, 2 and 3 sociaty was just and propsr. Tile indispui'abia facts, m nutshelL are that the petiiiana‘ anal regpmdwt 11G, 2 :md 3 sa§ieiies am registemci ca-opei‘a‘tiw sowéah‘as eugagcd in 01a busimss of pisciouhuro! 0:1 2007,2005, applisationg were invited on floatmg teodorS by Eaapad Panchayag Mahasamund, 1’01‘ Eoassiug out tho iifshizlg gi to tho Rogéstored ooooorativo sooiom which operateS withm the poriphoyy of 8 KM. The potitioner socio’iy and tho respondent 11o. 2 and ,, .Tai Mama Bhoncha Cooperahve Soaioty, Kurmhhaga? applied fey the: samo. Eavihg sottsidetoé. 8,11 tho aspacts, tho hast: of tiShhw tights of thh yond was awarded to tho respondent moiety; Jai Mama Bhanoha Coottet‘ative Society? Kurrubhata, {hereinafter referred to aS ‘1‘espondent sooiety’) vide order dated 5.9.2005, porsoant to the reso‘iution dated 20.7.;2005 (Almexut‘e P/l) . f, g s 1 : Being aggrievad aml dissa‘iigfmd, ihe peiitiomr socia‘ty ’Jwfau‘ed an apmal befclre {ha Cgileamr ix: Ra‘wizug Case No, léi’A—98i’2004-O5 @halkzigmg the order passad by ths Chiaf Exacutivr: Ofiicsr, Mahasamuad, on tha gmulad that iha petitionsr $ociety is Situated in village Teiibandha and 2A out 9f 25 membsm am the raaidsut 0f villaga Tglihandha. Thus. 'w mr policy of Le gavm‘nméng ths petiticmer society is an’iitlad to b6 alio‘ttad flshing yights of the said pond, The petitioner saciety’s r65isi1‘ati0n is sai‘iiei‘ in pomt of time and the petitioner society siiouid be given preference as per the gavermaiem paiicy, The Ceiieeier. Viée 0r&er daied 13.12200 {Amiexure 23/8). afm hearing beih the paiiiesa eame to the eonelusim that 58,89 hectare «3f the submerged ai‘ea is iii Viilage Kui‘i‘ubhata and 759 hectare 13 m Village Teiibaiidha‘ Thug, as per polie‘yg the Seeiety epei‘atiiig iii viliage Kui‘rubhata, ie the i‘eSpmident society, has; preferentiai tight ever the attotmeitt of fishing right of tiie Tetibattdha and the erea ef bettt the seeiety ate within the eeripheiy of 8 K‘M. Thus, the appeai tiled by the petitiener society wee rejected and the order passed by the Chief Executive Gffteeta Mahaeattttmd was ttpheidi Beihc awrieved ahd dissatisfied with the ordet passed by the b av " Ceileetei‘, the petitioner soeiety pi‘efet‘i‘eei e i‘e’v‘isien eaee no. 11/5};— 89/2005-06 before the Director, Panehayat, Government of Chhettisgat‘h Raigut‘, The Dii‘eetoi; Panehayat. aftei‘ havihg heard ‘ooth the parties and peiusii’ig documehts, eottfitmeci the hitdtttge teem-tied by the Coiteetor and :‘ejeeted the tevision Viete otdei‘ dated 12.042006 {&tttexure P/t }i Thus? this eetitioi’ii 6. Shi‘i Manoj F‘ai‘anjpe, ieai‘iied eottisei appearing for the petitiot‘iet would submit the same gi‘ouod before this Court as raisee before the Coileetet, iDeX contra, learned eottiisei appearing for the respondent society and respottdettt he. 5 attd 6 wettid sttepott the otders eessed by the authorities below. LO x _%wgm%w£§% Ewmwuwmwwwwwwgw$wwggww&w®w EE%§ €£§E§£E$wm aw? mug, “g E WE wEmw % Egg .Fwwgw EE\E%%§EE§E€W E E»? mg», wag E, % F55 E mg .nfmEbnoEvvvvw @EE§§§E§EKH¢E&W%£ Em%%\%.%§£&b% amwwiw wdw @gmw¢£rm@w§§£$wgww%mw. "ggkwwgwwz Erww§FEL$E£FEEME EnEEEhwaEMwmm§EwE wgwmwwwEmwwwEEawawgwwwE ~5EE$§£¥§%%wg%&EE q ‘ Em@£wwgw§%rmkmm§%§gk w in Eag$ ££Rm®WFMWEEEEEWwEEwW gap gm r?” % Ecw g? E? Em My mwwmwwwwmnwwwhwéwgwwpggm a,3b pm Wwwbmww mw %E\E% kw mm £$E£§$££w EEEr1c€€EE¢Emw$ WmmE wEE§£m§E%E m£§§§§w£¢§$baw¢hwr Eam EwE E Eww mg; Egaw E gqLLbrm%& mwExEEm wm {wwEwwEFvw w@&@f%w&%g%q§pm§% EKK$§$EEwEwww$E€$WE qL§g®E%%E\E Wwmwtwgmwéhmgagggww? g§§x§§ma¢wgrRmg wm “ E M ? %%%«wg%%gr%§&~mw EgbQEEEwgwEmwromE$wE ATEaagc£ rm wwhmLg? s Egg E Ewrwr%wp%%wm§@ wWEwE $ gags aw mmwg Mamwwmpmaanv wo33m EwLo ygmcm bnEmE 2w wem2 Em m2 4.2 “m? “ma wm “wm ME .2 egg EmEa 9MB 332$ wowmvmgw mmSo$ 2w g m wmEwmuE 2w wumgug “moEwQ 2w .EwEmmmwau wumh§ 3w 3mg gag M “a m® w% m an”? U‘wrw" *¥:§/§@?€’* 5 afga V§ a? mmmWWE€1QWa®WI§ EEWCrI WMH err-(Ha W QWa 3m (war’aw V? 1WI{% Ema an? a? 1H 311W W! W m m% 2% dWe/WW§ w Wé? mam“, x.¢i"§§§‘w&1f‘l G11 cm‘sfu} reading 0f ma abO‘Je sstaiacl clauSe$ mid pausing iha pQéEy it m CSLQbEmed ‘maL wu wgimen g 1 m a h» g 6:1 t0 i}: Sogia‘iy which 1C Opératiug Within the p6riph61y of 8 KM 1:3 Qase, 0m 01‘ mare secie:i€$ are working. the Okest some‘ty ahQLlc. b9 giveil @l‘efc Page {hm/mg 11mg QQhaéu d {Ewg ax; agrFdJé‘d “fogs a; mambm‘S 01 w socicw 1* x i1 161 1 1(16 cl r L t $16 mammars living lgbw thsz: povm‘ly iiaca 3110314, 110$ be tém m‘itaria f0; gyam of i gm: w; mkm Hg} a T} 3 2 i2 z; 0;: of the paiiiwwr is thai tha mad ‘ Fomoh m u a gaond is Simatgd Vz T zlbamha x1§iag aw ii is imawaz r3 adha h‘i‘igegieu pmdi iiiamfors, t’ge prefeg‘snev: ‘PLOJLJ 33$ giver! ”£3 :im s we‘v w gag OL Vi *my is} Tall dag 316a m ma preawt my; it is 1 rug: ti‘al my 3mm 1s situatpd m Tehbam": viilage out were Mag 8de’e oi ii“) ‘vatsg‘ peildage araa is i1} Kui‘mbh “ “ms, giaiitmg cf 1131 ii iigiits t0 i‘espenéeiit seeie‘ty 1< more viabEe amd boih the soc-iai‘igs are Qpayative within the pm‘iphei‘y afg KM. 16. Kw n cgard to me 16613 a‘tian of tha SGcie‘iy ai‘ an eaaiier pom: of ”mm: it i$ true iha'i 4&16 {iiffeyenca of few 1110mm is t}1ere but leaking iris ov 0 c 1 e t gml :11, megmmde of su‘bmergegee of KL Nanak “Ha“. i 1< jest an} mega; 1 z i ' iighing rights. m ’{he ‘esg‘sendexri seeiety. The guidelines am} the poiicy have i0 be 1:113 C? keepmg in View ihe mmmon anal it sheuid not be foiiewed so as $9 defeeii s on; i, 1 i Em; a might t9 be aehie'v‘ed 3 J me peliey ll. 111 111w let? 1d to me fie s 0? he egse E am of {Ree Censidereei Opinien iimi the greet of leeee of tishiiig’i‘ight to the i‘eependent seeiety i3 legal :«md propei: "file findings i‘egai‘deai by the authet‘itiee below is wexeeetionabie. T , y m e; 6 $95 The questiw of sewnd ravision is not mgessary to ha @xamilaéd in thé present case. it is well settled principk of Eaw that unéar Ai'ticlé 227 0f the Cmlstitm'ion of luqlia, this Com: has juIiSdiciiog ofjudicml mvi§w of the m‘dar pasaed by $116 Court beiew. i1: 17:16 avail; thaw w 111a§§f€s$ zmd appamm army on me faw of the pmceediizgS b21366; 0n ihe $1631 ignoranca 03‘ 1mm disregax‘d to the provisims of iaw er thm‘a is grave faiiura of justiw or grave injugtiga has Ocaasianed thez‘eby. Fmthei; ihis Cour; can alaca ematain thf; petition it} itS supen’iSOry juxisdictien if there is parvamétv ig‘regutarity miliagatity in tits prOQeSS 0f daisiam mt £11 ths dmission its¢1£ Applyittg tha above settlad prhmipieg Of law t0 ths facts ofthg present cgee, it does not warrant at} interference with the imeugaed orders pesset‘; by the autherities below. Tints, this petitioe, ie disméeeecl, No Order as ta costs, .i: Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge l p l2, l3.