1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.3166 OF 1998. Vidyasagar S/o Shankarrao Hardapkar. ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents. ... Mr.Suresh Kulkarni, advocate for the petitioner Mr.N.B.Patil, Asstt.Govt. Pleader for the State. Mr.H.A.Joshi, advocate holding for Mr.Vinay Muglikar, advocate for Respondent No.5. Mr.V.B.Nayak, advocate for the Respondent No.3 - absent. ... WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4010 OF 1998. Smt.Vijaya Govindrao Nandedkar ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents. ... Mr.Pradeep Deshmukh, advocate holding for Mr.V.V.Raut, advocate for the petitioner. 2 Mr.V.D.Rakh, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for the State. Mr.V.B.Nayak, advocate for the Respondent No.4 - absent. CORAM : B.R.GAVAI AND : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,JJ. Date : 15.07.2010. ORAL ORDER (Per S.V.Gangapurwala,J.) 1. The petitioners have assailed the orders of transfer. This Court vide order dated 16.7.1999 had issued interim directions. As per the said directions, the petitioners were asked to resume on their original posts i.e. the posts on which they were working before the order dated 24.6.1998. The said interim order is in operation till today. Any interference at this stage would unsettle the position after lapse of twelve (12) years. In light of the same, the petitions are allowed in terms of the interim orders. If the salary is deposited in W.P.No. 4010/1998, the same may be paid to the petitioner. Rule made absolute on above terms 3 with no order as to costs. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) (B.R.GAVAI,J.) asp/office/wp316698