IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1999 of 2011 SYED SARFRAZ HUSSAIN . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 03. 07.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, for the respondent Wakf Board and for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he proposes to question the impugned order dated 5.1.2011 of the Board in a statutory Appeal under Section 95 of the Wakf Act, 1995. He next submits that the limitation for filing of an Appeal was 30 days from the date of the order. The writ petition was filed on 31.1.2011 within the period of 30 days. Therefore the Appeal may be directed to entertained without going into issues of limitation as the petitioner was bona fide pursuing the wrong remedy. Relying on 1996 (6) SCC 199 (Danda Rajeshwari Versus Bodavula hanumayamma ), this Court directs that if the petitioner files such Appeal within 30 days from today, let the same be heard and decided in accordance with law after hearing all concerned without going into issues of limitation. The writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. P.K ( Navin Sinha, J.)