1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 1 OF 2009 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 31 OF 2008 Boys Sports Company Bombay Engineer Group ) and Centre Training Battalion I, Kirkee, Pune ).. Petitioner Versus Vinayak Mahadeo Nale ).. Respondent Mr. M.S. Bhardwaj for the Petitioner. Mr. G.M. Savagare i/b Mr.Prashant Suryawanshi for the Respondent. CORAM : J.N. PATEL, ACTING C.J. DATED : 18TH JUNE 2010 P.C. This Review Petition has been filed only on the ground that the reason for which the Respondent-original Petitioner was removed is on minor ground which falls with the exception under the Agreement dated 18th November 2000 and, therefore, the Application for appointment of Arbitrator was not maintainable. On this ground it is submitted that the order dated 24th July 2009 passed by the Chief Justice be recalled and the Application should be dismissed. 2 2. On the other hand, it is submitted that the appointment of Arbitrator in any manner is illegal as, in addition to removal of the Respondent-original Applicant, the other dispute, such as, is one falling under Clause 3 of the Agreement. Whatever may be the controversy, the Arbitrator who is the Secretary to the Government of India can very well decide these issues. Therefore, I am not inclined to consider the Review Petition as the order under review does not suffer from any error apparent on record. 3. Review Petition dismissed. ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE