!w X NITH HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BI£UR WRIT PEHTION 5 NO 2009 Surendm Sungh Thakur aged about 60 years $on 0f Shrl Khem slngh Thakur “Head Master” 6W? Mlddle ‘ School Tamara, Block - Samngnrh,‘ ‘Tahsil- Sarangar‘h, DisTT- Raigarh (6.6) PETITIONER > VERSU /1‘ The 51am of Chhcm‘isgarh Through— The Secrefar'y Deparfmenf of School ‘dutahon Manfmlaya Dau Kalyan Smgh hawan, Ralpur (CG) Tha Direefar Commissioner, Lok Shiksharg Sanchanalaya, Raipur (6.6.) The Distriat Education Officer, Di5trict ’— nigarh (C6,) he Blgck Eduggfion Officer, Block— Sarangarh, DIS1ricf - Rgigg’rh (C.G.) RESPONDENTS W’RIT PE11T10N U/A — 226 OF THE CONS‘HTUTIONOF INDIA W S LrE B / R T § SB z HONBLE SHRI JUSTIgE ?R§1INKER 33IWAKER ’ ’‘ ’ Surendra Sih Thakr ‘ RES?ONDENT$ State of CG. ’ 85 Ohe tm ' ’‘ Shri Roo Ni, ounSel fo he etitionar. Shri Sumesh a GA. for he State, p ak c r t p Bjaj, t ORAL ORDER (24..99) 9720 Wth the consent of the counse1 for th arties, he mter is ar finiy B way of this petitin e petitioner is seekin regular a scae on he post of Tcher. Counsel for he petitioner amits that numr of identical titions have ben decided by thie Court n he issue involved is a cncluded one. He has also referred o one of the orders in W.P.(S) No. 813/2007 (Ram Kumar Sahu V. State of Chhattisgarh] in which regular pay scale was granted from the date of initial appointment. Counsel for the respondents/State submits that in the light of the judgment of this Court the petitioner may make a. representation to the authorities concerned and the same wouid be decided after scrutinizing the factual and legal position. Thus? it is directed that if the petitioner makes a representation to the authorities concerned within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order,. the same shall be decided Within a further period of one month fro the date of its receipt. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of. / l Sd/-' Pritinkér B‘iwaker ‘ Judge HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ET 3EL$5PUR ‘ ¢ ‘ W.P.{S) NO. 3763/2009 PEMTIONER ng u Versus WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 9F TIIE COEISTITUIiOw OF XNDIA Appearance: i e n t at hed al. y o th g py l t ea t ub be pe e ad t o t m \