^- IN THE HI6H COURT OF JUOICATURE AT BILASPUR Cr.M.P. No. (/3CLt5 /2011 PETITIONER (NON- APPLICANT) Pawan Kumar Patre, S/o Pudu Ram Patre, aged 40 years, R/o Viliage- Badora, Police STation <& Tahsil- Masturi, bistrict- Bilaspur (C.G.) Vs RESPQN&ENTS (APPLICANT) ^^ ^ffp%< •^ •'hs ...•••-'\ Smt. Jaleshwari Patre, W/o Pawan Kumar Patre, aged 24 years, R/o Devrikhurd, Near Shiv Mandir, Quarter No.112, Potice Station- Torwa, Tahsil- and District- Bilaspur (C.6.) PETITION UNDER SECTION48ZOF THE CObE OF CRIMINAL PROCEOURE. 1973 ^fy%. IL^ ^ss^ '° —Jil SD^T^iT WM an^i ?hiflcfr ^TffcT 'ssi '^[plRra, ^Wl<i. Ttwwy sw^y Tra^ *11*ICTI (hKlch fa'bcitT' 200 ai^t'^aiWdfCT S8 ; HON'BLE MR. 3VSTSCE PRITINKER DXWAKER 01.07.2011 Shri Rajeev Shriv^stava, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Pravin Dhur^ndhar, counsel for the respondent. In the present petjt) order dated 11.05.2011 Bilaspur in M. Cr. C. NoJ !on the challenge is to the passed by Famlty Court, 85/2011 awarding interim for the petitioner is that the respondent was subj petitioner was having illic) tady and therefore she was| to live separately. Both the parties fairl «hi<)frl41-f iwcll' ^ ftIA <Fa<<;i< ^? aipin sil^l maintenance of Rs. 2,000 i(i favour of the respondent. Contention of Shri ^hrivastavg, leamed counsel [as the respondent ts living separately without any re^ison, she is not entitled for the maintenance. On the other hand i|: has been argued by Shri Dhurandhar, learned coun^el for the responderrt that iected to cruelty and the t relation with some other left with no other option but rjy submit that the evidenoe has already started in the Qourt below. In the facts and clrcpmstances of the case, this petition is disposed of witfi a direction_tOLjheL_FannLty_ 1 -'fi Stter. XI-HC-22 Ta -ilWlcll, tlTnwiii. (««yiiyi< 37i^?r iRrg? ^^...^^:.£..%^200 i^^r' sn^r^l r<-ii«b 3n^?i st>li°b^l)tcl an^i'B^nwsto < Court to decide the main possible, preferably wlthin date of hearing. It would to apprise the Court below Registry is directed tc^ the Famiiy Court. c6se itself as expedtttousty as five months from the next (36 the duty of the petltioner ^bout passing of this order. send a copy of this order to +llld41-1 tlTOff •? fetA {FdtriK ^raiPOTStl^l Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge 1 -Sft •6'Kri