IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.33505 OF 2009 VIJAY CHOUDHARY, SON OF RAJENDRA CHAUDHARY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BATHUWA BUZURG, POLICE STATION MUSARI GHARARI, DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR *********** 2 05/11/2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case under Sections395, 364, 396 & 412 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that on the basis of the statement recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, recovery was made from the house of Rajendra Choudary, the father of these petitioners. Annexure-3 is the seizure list which shows that the house belongs jointly to the petitioners and his father. The contention of the petitioner is that he is living with his in-laws and there has been a partition in the family. These points may be a good ground for grant of regular bail. However, I do not find this case to be fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. This application is thus dismissed. ANAND ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )