@ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR @-'mg&xg géam“? Writ Petition No. :Milié /2oo3 WRIT PETITION U/A 226/227 W OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER As stated above in the cause title’ PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS As stated above in the cause title. PETITIONER r Smt. Umaravvati Dcvi Agrawal Aged about 65 years W/ o Ram Kishan Agrawal R/ 0. Ram Sagarpara, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS The State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary .H" Department of Housing u-. 6g ~ and Environment Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Collector Raipur (C.G.) 3‘ Municipal Corporation Through its Commissioner Raipur (C.G.) 4. Director, Town and Country Planning Raipur (C.G.) HIGH COQRT Of CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2663 OF 2003 ETITIONER Smt. Umarawati Devi Agrawal Versus The State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon‘bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Parag Kotecha, Advocate’for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. Ms. Meera Jaiswal, Advocate for the respondent No.3. RESPONDENTS ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 16‘“ day of September, 2010) 1) Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.3, on the basis or return, submits that the land in dispute is not required at present for widening of the road. In future, if the same is required, the respondent Corporation shall take appropriate steps, in accordance with law and after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 2) ln view of the above,_according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication and the petition has become infructuous. 3) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, as having become infructuous. «a: l Sau'sh K. Agmhom *T Judge «I r} . Sd/— Gowri P