IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.651 of 2010 Ram Baboo Sahni S/O Girja Sahni R/O Vill Manikpur, P.O.Mustafaganj, Block-Meenapur, Distt-Muzaffarpur. ………… Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar , Through The Secretary, Department Of Human Resources Development Of Bihar Patna 2. The Secretary, Department Of Human Resources Development Government Of Bihar,Patna 3. The Director , Primary Education Government Of Bihar, Patna 4. The District Magistrate Sheohar 5. The District Superintedent Of Education Sheohar 6. The Block Development Officer Tariyani, Distt- Sheohar 7. The Block Education Extension Offficer Tariyani, Sheohar 8. The Mukhiya , Panchayat Raj Athkoni, Tariyani, Block Sheohar 9. The Panchayat Secretary, Panchayat Raj Athkoni, Tariyani, Block Sheohar. ……………. Respondents ---------------------------------- 3. 12/12/2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly accepts that the case of the petitioner is covered by a judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of State of Bihar Vs. Mamta Kumari, reported in 2010(4) PLJR 318. Hence, he does not press this application. However, he submits that the respondents should be directed to release the due salary of the petitioner of the period he has actually worked. The writ application is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the 2 respondents to pay the admitted due salary of the petitioner of the period he has actually worked, after due enquiry, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)