IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH DECEMBER 2007 / 21ST AGRAHAYANA 1929 WP(C).No. 36729 of 2007(V) --------------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- E.KUNHIMAYIN, S/O.KUNHAMMED HAJI, ELEYADATH HOUSE, KAITHAKKAL, PANAMARAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.JITHIN SRI.R.SUDHAKARA MENON RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SPECIAL SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, RURAL DEVELOPMENT, COMMISSIONERATE OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, KALPETTA BLOCK, WAYANAD. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BEJOY CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J. ========================= W.P.(C)NO.36729 OF 2007 ========================= Dated this the 12th day of December 2007 JUDGMENT The petitioner is working as a Joint Block Development Officer at Kalpetta Block from 2006 onwards. He contends that earlier he had worked in Malappuram, Kannur and Ernakulam. By Ext.P1 order he has been transferred to Chavakkad. He pleads personal reasons as a grievance as regards Ext.P1. In my view, if the petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P1, he may move the government pointing out the reasons which are peculiar to him. In the result, the writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to prefer a representation before the first respondent if he is aggrieved by Ext.P1, within a period of two weeks from today. Thereupon the first respondent shall, after hearing the petitioner, take a decision thereon, paying particular attention to the personal reasons pleaded by the petitioner, within a period of four weeks thereafter. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition also before the government. V.GIRI, JUDGE css/