IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.282 of 2009 MD. SHABBIR …PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. MD. ABDUL 3. MD. SHAMHIR 4. MD. SHAMSHAD 5. MD. NAUSHAD 6. ABRUNISHA 7. BIBI MADINA …OPPOSITE PARITES For the petitioner : Mr. T.N.Maitin, Sr. Advocate & : Mr. Rajeev Kr. Sinha, For the State : Mr. J. Upadhyay,APP ----------- 02. 05.10.2010 Petitioner is the informant (P.W.6). He is aggrieved by judgment and order of acquittal recorded by learned trial court in S.T.No.678 of 1996. I have perused the reasonings culled out in paragraphs 12 and 14 of the judgment. This court does not find any patent illegality in consideration of the matter by learned trial court justifying interference. The application lacks merit which is accordingly dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )