1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3798 OF 2008 (Director of Social Forestry, Pune & Ors. vs. Dilip Vitthalrao Jaybhaye) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. OCTOBER 08, 2008. Shri Kankale, learned Assistant Government Pleader contends that the respondent being Daily Wager, there was no question of learned Member of Industrial Court even ordering his consideration as it amounts to regularisation. Support is being taken from the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of the Secretary, State of Karnataka vs. Uma Devi, reported at AIR 2006 SC 1806. However, I find that the learned Member of Industrial Court has relied upon the policy decision of State of Maharashtra dated 19.10.1996 as per which for absorption, certain norms have been prepared and those who fulfill those norms are only to be absorbed. Several employees have accordingly been absorbed as one time measure. The learned Member of Industrial Court though prima facie finds the respondent entitled to 2 such absorption, he has directed the petitioners to consider the case of the respondent as per said Government Resolution dated 19.10.1996. I, therefore, do not find any merit in this writ petition. Writ Petition is dismissed. JUDGE *GS.