IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHLA AT NAINIAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 817 of 2008 Writ Stay Application No. 6827/2008 Surendra Singh, S/o Amar Singh, R/o A-14 Sharda Nagar, Jwalapur, P.S. Jwalapur, District Haridwar. ................ Petitioner Versus The State of Uttarakhand and others ............. Respondents Mr.Navneet Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.C. Pujari, Addl. Government Advocate for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocate for respondents no.3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr.Navneet Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.C. Pujari, Addl. G. A. for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocate for respondents no.3. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. On Due consideration of the submission of the learned counsel for the parties; the contents of the F.I.R. and the allegations made in the F.I.R. as well as the supplementary affidavit filed by the petitioner, I do not find that the petitioner-Surendra Singh is entitled for relief claimed in the petition. 4. I am refraining form commenting on the merits of the case lest it may adversely affect the petitioner’s case at the trial which is yet to state. 5. In view of above, the petition is dismissed in limine. Consequently, the stay application is also dismissed. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 24.10.2008 V.K.