IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 25TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 6TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 6159 of 2010(T) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.SAHADEVAN SUPERINTENDENT, KSRTC, ADOOR DEPOT, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.P.RAJEEVAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DEPUTY CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER (PRC) KSRTC, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. ASSISTANT TRANSPORT OFFICER KSRTC, ADOOR DEPOT PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. MR.V.V.N.NAMBIAR, SC FOR KSRTC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.6159 of 2010 (T) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 25th day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T Challenge in the writ petition is against the audit note in the service book of the petitioner made by Audit Officers. Even going by the averments in the writ petition, no action on the basis of the audit note has been initiated by the respondents. Only if any prejudicial action has been initiated, then alone can the petitioner have a cause of action to file a writ petition. Therefore, as at present, the writ petition is premature. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg