IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY WRIT PETITION No.33 of 2005 Between: Bharathamma and three others. … Petitioners And The Revenue Divisional Officer/LAO, Narayanpet Division, Narayanpet, Mahaboobnagar District and two others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri K. Govind. Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Revenue R.1 and R.2 Sri V.Manohar Rao for R.3. This Court made the following: ORDER:- At the interlocutory stage, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This Writ Petition is filed for a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of respondents 1 and 2 in contemplating to pay compensation in respect of Ac.7.08 cents of land situated in Neredgam village, Maganoor Mandal, Mahabubnagar District, to respondent No.3 in pursuance of Award No.1134/04 dated 13- 12-2004, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner also sought for a consequential direction to respondents 1 and 2 to withhold or deposit the amount to the credit of O.S.No.17 of 2003 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Narayanpet. In the affidavit filed along with the vacate stay petition, respondent No.3-vacate stay applicant stated on oath that O.S.No.17 of 2003 filed for partition was dismissed to the extent of the property in dispute in the Writ Petition. He also filed a copy of the judgment and decree. Sri K.Govind, learned counsel for the petitioner, has not controverted this fact. The grievance of the petitioner in the Writ Petition that pending the suit filed by him the land acquisition officer was proposing to pay the compensation to respondent No.3 ceased to exist with the dismissal of the suit. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. -------------------------------- ---- C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J 23-6-2008 MNR