- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4441 OF 2005 ... S.K.Jain & ors. ...Petitioners v/s. Union of India & ors. ...Respondents ... Mr.K.P.Anilkumar for the Petitioners. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Respondents Nos. 1 to 4. ... CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATED: 8TH JULY, 2008 P.C.: 1. By this petition the Petitioners challenge the - 2 - order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal rejecting the Original Application filed by the Petitioners. 2. The Petitioners had approached the Central Administrative Tribunal making basically the grievances against the restructuring of the transit cell department in the year 1993. The Tribunal has held that the petition filed in the year 2000 challenging restructuring done in the year 1993 is barred by the limitation as laid down under the Administrative Tribunal Act. 3. We have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners. He submitted that the Petitioners had made a representation and they have filed Original Application within the period of limitation after rejection of the representation. Therefore, we asked the learned Counsel to show the pleadings in that regard in the Original Application. He fairly stated that there were no pleadings in that regard in the Original Application. Therefore, we asked the learned Counsel to show us pleadings in the petition in regard to the finding of the tribunal that the O.A. was barred by the law of limitation. The - 3 - learned Counsel fairly stated that there is nothing pleaded in the petition also. Thus, there is no material on record to show that the Original Application was filed within the period of limitation. The petition, therefore, fails and is dismissed. Rule discharged with no order as to costs. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)