IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1791 OF 2010 DATE OF DECISION: SEPTEMBER 21, 2010 Ram Chander .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. S. S. Duhan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG, Haryana, for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. (ORAL) The primary grievance of the petitioner was against the order of his suspension. The submission is that the officer, who had passed the order placing the petitioner under suspension, was not legally competent to do so. In the reply filed, it is disclosed that the order of suspension of the petitioner has been withdrawn. Accordingly, this part of the relief, as claimed in the writ petition, has been rendered infructuous. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as having become infructuous. September 21, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE