IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36887 of 2010 1. UMAKANT MISHRA S/O NAMONATH MISHRA 2. DHANANJAY KUMAR MISHRA @ BHOLA S/O UMAKANT MISHRA. 3. MUKESH KUMAR MISHRA @ MUKESH KUMAR S/O UMAKANT MISHRA, 4. MRITUNJAY KUMAR MISHRA S/O UMAKANT MISHRA ALL R/O VILLAGE-SASULA, P.S. MAJORGANJ, DISTRICT-SITAMARHI. 5. AMOD NATH JHA @ AMOD KHA S/O LATE SHOBHA KANT JHA, R/O VILLAGE-MURHA, P.S. MAJORGANJ, DISTRICT-SITAMARHI. --PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. PUSHPA DEVI WIFE OF MRITUNJAY KUMAR MISHRA, DAUGHTER OF KARUNKARAN JHA, PRESENTLY R/O VILLAGE-MOTIPUR, P.S. BAIRGANIYA, DISTRRICT- SITAMARHI. --OPP.PARTY 2 02.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the five petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners are named accused in this complaint case wherein petitioner no.4 is husband, others are in-laws of the complainant, carrying general allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. Petitioner no.1, father in law, appears filing of informatory petition stating that there was demand of rupees one lac from petitioner no.4 as a help in the marriage of sister of the complainant which he could not be able to do 2 so. The present case appears filed against all the petitioners and other family members. Still petitioner no.4 is ready and willing to resume and continue marital life with the complainant who is residing with here two children at her father’s place. Considering the facts and circumstances, on the event of petitioner no.4 filing of application making offer to pay ad-interim maintenance of Rs.1200/- (Rupees twelve hundred) per month subject to final order of competent authority and begin with the payment, the petitioners, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, are directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar Sitamarhi, in Complaint Case no. C1/1217/2009, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioners shall remain present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case. If the petitioners fail to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation or petitioner no.4 3 make any single default in payment, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad