1 A IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.412 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1020 OF 2006 Madhukar Swami Palleria .. Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondents Mr.Taraq Sayyed for the applicant. Ms.M.H.Mhatre, A.P.P.for the State. CORAM : A.R.JOSHI, J. DATED : 8th JULY, 2009. P.C. Heard learned Advocate Shri Sayyed for the applicant accused on the present bail application. Also heard learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. It is the third application for bail, as earlier two applications were preferred before the another Bench and were disposed of. One of the earlier bail applications was withdrawn with liberty to move the court for taking up appeal for final hearing. First application of said earlier two bail applications was not granted by another Bench when it 2 was specifically mentioned on behalf of the applicant that he could not furnish any bail amount more than Rs.15,000/- and he could not deposit the fine amount of Rs.1 lakh. In fact on this premise such first bail application was not allowed. 3. In this third bail application again the same circumstance as to poor financial condition of the applicant accused continues. Under such circumstances, it is submitted on behalf of the applicant that alternatively the main appeal may be taken up for final hearing on a fixed date and in that event, applicant may not press the bail application. Considering these submissions, the present bail application is disposed of as not allowed, however, directions were given to the registry to fix the present criminal appeal after four weeks for final hearing. 4. With these directions, the bail application is disposed of. (A.R. JOSHI, J.)