^/l' IN THE HIGH GOURI.OF JUaififiBUjBfe.ffLBU-ASRUR CHH/CTIISS&BU. WRIT PETITION N0 1155- OF 2004 A1 PETITIONER Surendra Kumar Jaiswal S/o Late Kashi Prasad Jaiswal Aged about24years R/o Hasdeo Dafai, lassary Collieries, District Korea (C.G) VERSES RESPONDENT ..••^y<! /\l^p' ..<'^ .^€: .< ^v^'-^y ^y' ^^- ^^ .^. South Eastem galdfields Limited Though - Chairman cum Managing Director, Bila^pur (C.G.) Chief General Manager South Eastern-f.oldfields Limited Hasdeoarea, R O. South Jhagrakhand, Distt Korea (C.G) Chief PersQnnei! Manager South East^rn poldfields Limited, Hgsdeo area, RO. South Jhagrakhand, Distf Korea (C.G) Marfager South Eastern Coldfields Limited Office of the Manager, F'alimara Incline, R O. South Jhagrakhand, Distt Korea (C.G) WRIT PETITIONUNDERARTICLE 226/227 OFTHrCqNSTITUEl@ <3FllSD!A XI-HC-22 3TI^T?iT R-li«h3n^T St>1 'ulg(1 ^*- 3^'-?n?iRTi]', aTd^'Ks, Rjditiy ^....^.^.'..ILSS'Z- MWp{l shll* ••-••^•••••••••'•'•""•^•/g^-20(^- fc|<)<""" 311^1 ^WIWdfeT 4-4-2QOS Dr. ShaileshAhuja, Mr. H.B.Agrawal, for the respondents. Heard. The petitioner has the Constttution of tndia, on ttiel Jaiswrat, whowas srorking as However, some inquiry was !ns| the ground of unauthorized 4-1-1997 upon whterft he respondent authorities did not Prasad Jaiswal died. representatlon vide Annacure P-| petitloner on compasa'onate Evwi the petitioner made respondents. Retum has been fited been stated that since Late service, therefore, the compasslonato ground. However, torned eou< respondents ought to have petitioner, therefore, they be teamed counsel for ttie Having heard leamed co[ fEicts snd circumstsncQs of tti© , coun^el for ths p^ttoner. SeniorlAdvocate with Mr. Panka| ^rswal, Advocate directed respond^nts tii<<Ici<fl-f iitidT^te'<fl <Ri+iii<. ^iarf^riTan^T preferfed this writ petHton under Article226Q27 of ground that he Is son of Late Kashi F'rasad Lolader in the Soutti Eastern Coalfields Umited. InsjUtuted against the fattier of the petitioner en abs^nce from the duty and hewas fermlnated on mad|B representatiwi to ttie aUthonfiTO, but tte Ipay any heed, and in tte meanUme, Kashi The|refore, the pefitioner's mother made a ^Sto Uie respondent authortties to appoint the gi|ound and no appointtnent has been nrade. repre^entation ttiat has ncrt bean con^tored ^ the <^n behalf af the respondents tn which it has Iteshi Prasad Jaisvral was tierminated from petJUt^ner is not entitted for appointment on ^sel for ttie petitioner sutxnte that fte tecfded the representation nioved by the to deckle the representation to which hasno objecSon. insel for ttie paities and taving regard to fte C8S6- tft^ FQspondpnts aro <ijrl6ct©dto ^©cidG XI-HC-22 3:^''<<wi<t<i, ®tnwis,Rtciiyy r ' . 3)1^1 <43|t*l < HiiCTiaiiitn """""""^'"•y'g^ 2004- R'b«A •ati^r^r f^iNssn^r ^'is:; ^:jis Ni^fer »HR><( ^' p Soma v Klil y^7 1 'Y^ w \e~' <«^ 3<i^i 6'wiw nfer the representadon made by the eight weete from e date of rec^i taw. If is made ctear ttiat if tti^ petitioner is not available with th^ a fresh representation vrithin two and the respondents are directefd weeks from the date of receipt ofl With ffie directions aforesajd, Partes areentiUed for Gerfped eopy ofthis ordw |mother of the peBUoner within a period of jlpt of cofy of this order, in accordanee wHh representation flted by the mottwr of the respondents tten the petitioner can make (weeks from today raislng all Ms grievances, to ctecide the same within anottier eight t(ierepreseritertion. I, the pefition stands dispased af. !t]i«Ia41-i*iiiMTfftecfl'<.Ritrii<. ^iSTRlITSl^T Sd/- ^.Bhado° - judge ('ft^^l^) 111 -AU^^*t-l*K---^l*l^...