IN THE 'HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR § / / SINGLE BENCH (CHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION No gé GL 120 PETITIONERS Koshi Shukla , w Qt w a Aged Shukla about Occu 4ggtel$s Vg/oooiajendra R/o Ballka Sampreshan Grlh Rajnandgaon, (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, 'Panchayat & Social Service, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) /27 Director, Panchayat & Social Service D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 3 Superintendent, Baiika Sampreshan Grih, Rajnandgaon, (C.G.) Smt. Kamia Bai, W/o Shri Anup Das Mehan, Post. Chindh, Tahéil, Sarangarh, Dist. Raigarh, Qv. $$hu RESPONDENT y“ (“w .n- €’ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ... / / w Xl-HC-78 W mq'ém: w P ........ §l‘:I}Iéll IL-. ........... ' ..... ‘ 200 3/ 21 WQTWWEW) anéwmm mmmméa mm#fi€$m amméatgmiai aiwanéa 2 1. 1 1 . 2005 Shri Anand Shukla, couilsVI for the patiti'oner. Shn' Arun Sao, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. Heard. Learnsd co'unsel for' the pqtitioner submits that the petitio was tiled in View of anticipated termination as a new person has been selected against the post f Cook. He also submits that no termination order has been pass d till date. In View of the above, the etitioner wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to move this ourt again if need arises. In View of foregoing, the pe 'tion is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently,'I.A. No. 9 418/2005, application for urgent hearing also stands disposed ofe sw— ,9 Satish K. Agnihotri i’ Judge i \‘ / n