IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28112 of 2009 MD.GUDDU Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.28284 of 2009 MD.CHAND Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 25.08.2009 Heard both sides. Both the matters arise out of the same occurrence giving rise to Town P.S. case no. 137 of 2009 instituted under Sections 363, 365, 366 and 34 of Indian Penal Code. As per the allegation in the F.I.R., 14 year’s old daughter of the informant was enticed away by the accused persons named therein. Both the petitioners are very much named in the F.I.R.. The girl on her rescue appeared before the court and made statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. on 30.3.2009. The said document is on record. It appears that the girl has also alleged that these two petitioners had hand in enticing her away. Looking to the allegation, this court is not inclined to admit them to bail. Their prayer for bail stands rejected. This court, however, observes that if the trial of the case is not taken within 07 months from the date of receipt/communication of a copy of this order, the petitioners shall have liberty to renew their prayer for bail. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )