1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR. LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.40 of 2008 Pherulal Palu Raut .vs. Shri Shriknt Ramrao Khati and anr. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. Mr.J.L.Bhoot, Adv. for the appellant. Coram: ANOOP V. MOHTA and C. L. PANGARKAR, JJ. Dated : 1st SEPTEMBER, 2008. This is a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the tenant against the decree of eviction based upon the concurrent findings of fact with regard to bonafide need of respondent's tenement. There is no dispute that the petitioner/appellant contested the matter at every stage and all the courts, after going through the record and material available on the record; concurrently held and accepted the bonafide need of the landlord. The learned single 2 Judge, therefore, rightly dismissed the petition filed by the appellant/petitioner. We see there is no case made out by the appellant to interfere with the same on any point. The Letters Patent Appeal is accordingly dismissed. JUDGE. JUDGE. chute