IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15332 of 2011 Sunil @ Sunil Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Madanjeet Kumar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ***** 03. 11.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State who is armed with carbon copy of the case diary. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Kadamkuan (Patrakar Nagar) P.S. Case No. 928/2005, pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge, IInd, Patna. In this six years old case petitioner’s name emerged during investigation from the statement of co-accused Bhushan Yadav and his wife who was identified by the informant during investigation. The vehicle involved was also recovered from different place, and as per allegation, petitioner was one of the active participant in the guise of police personnel. No doubt, he has come with a plea that Bhushan Yadav was also at inimical terms with him due to demand of some back wages. But considering the facts and circumstances and claim of the informant to identify the persons, if apprehended, the petitioner does not deserve the privilege sought. Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected, in case of his surrender before the court below, his prayer for regular bail may be considered on its own merit without being prejudice of instant refusal. Rajeev/ ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)