IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29608 of 2010 BHARAT YADAV, son of Shiv Mandir Yadav, resident of village-Jamira, P.S. Arrah Muffassil, District-Bhojpur(Arrah). Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.10.2010 The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Ara Muffassil P.S. Case No. 26 of 2010 under Sections 272, 273, 420, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47(A) of the Excise Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner’s complicity is alleged on the ground of confessional statement of co-accused who was arrested at the spot and the recovery of several articles used in manufacturing of illegal liquor was recovered. It is further submitted that wine shop was running in the name of Amit Kuamr Jaiswal but it was suspected that the petitioner was running of the shop in the name of Amit Kumar Jaiswal. Further submission is that the police has not been able to collect sufficient evidence against the petitioner and that chargesheet has been submitted against the several accused and the investigation has been kept pending against the petitioner in the case. The learned A.P.P. does not point out any other material against the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and the petitioner, namely, Bharat Yadav in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within the period of four weeks, is admitted to anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10, 000/- (ten thousand) each with two 2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Arrah, in Ara Muffassil P.S. Case No. 26 of 2010, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Ravi/- ( C. M. Prasad, J.)