IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13270 of 2006 BAIJ NATH SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 5 2.5.2011 It appears that due to typographical error at page 2, it has been noted that the petitioner has since reached the age of superannuation in the year 2005. It should be read 2009. Let it be so read. In the last but one paragraph of the order dated 15.4.2011 it is typed that as the petitioner has reached the age of superannuation , his retrial and post retrial benefits would accordingly be calculated as if he was in service. It should be mentioned that as the petitioner has reached the age of superannuation, his retiral and post retiral benefits would accordingly be calculated as if he was in service. Let it be so read. singh (Navaniti Prasad Singh,J)