IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1527 of 2009 Shantosh Kumar Singh & Ors . Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors . ----------- 2. 01.07.2011 None for the petitioners. Counsel for the State has assisted the Court from the pleadings in the writ petition and the counter affidavit both. The petitioners claim to have secured 14,13 and 12 marks respectively in their physical tests. They alleged discrimination asserting appointment of persons with lesser marks. The pleadings in that regard at Paragraph-11 are wholly inadequate and vague. There is no mention of any names of the candidate and marks secured by such candidate who has been appointed. The allegation of discrimination is essentially a question of fact. The pleading has to be specific. Counsel for the State has taken the Court through Paragraphs 6, 7 and 8 of the counter affidavit. The Court finds no merits in this application. It is accordingly dismissed. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)