IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 16TH MARCH 2010 / 25TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 8677 of 2010(H) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. SUHABIB S.P., AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.SALAM, DARULHADEE HOUSE, MADIYAN P.O., MONIKOTH, KASARGOD DISTRICT. 2. JAWAHIR P.T., AGED 22 YEARS,S/O.ABDURAHIMAN P.T., PAVUTHODIKA HOUSE,KUTTOOR NORTH P.O.,A.R.NAGAR, KUZHICHINA, MALAPPURAM. 3. MUHAMMED NIYAS T.K., AGED 23 YEARS, S/O.KASIM T.K., NIYANISH MANZIL, CHALIAYM P.O.,CALICUT. 4. RIYAS T.P.,AGED 25 YEARS, S/O.MOHAMMED KUNJU, T.P.HOUSE, THOTTY P.O., PALLIKERA,KASARGOD. BY ADV. SMT.MEDONA LOPEZ RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CAICUT REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, THENHIPALAM,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY SHRI P.C.SASIDHARAN SC, CALICUT UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.8677 OF 2010 ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 16th DAY OF MARCH, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioners have completed their B.Tech Course from KMCT Engineering College, Manasserry, Mukkom. The 1st petitioner has appeared for the 3rd Semester examination in June, 2009. Since the marks awarded for the paper Electrical Engineering is very less than what he had expected, he had applied for revaluation of the same, vide Exhibit P2. 2. The 2nd petitioner has appeared for the 3rd Semester examination in December, 2008. Since the marks awarded for the paper Engineering Mathematics is less than what he had expected, he applied for revaluation of that paper, vide Exhibit P6. The 2nd petitioner has appeared for the 5th Semester examination in June,2009 in which examination also he had applied for revaluation of the subject Mechanical Engineering, vide Exhibit P9. 3. The 3rd petitioner has appeared for the 3rd Semester examination in June, 2009. Since the marks awarded to the W.P.(C)No.8677/10 -2- papers, Engineering Mathematics-III and Electronics Circuits-I, were very less than what he had expected, he applied for revaluation of those papers vide Exhibit P12. 4. The 4th petitioner has appeared for the 3rd Semester Examination in June 2009. Since the marks awarded for the paper Electrical Engineering is very less than what he has expected, he applied for revaluation of the same vide Exhibit P16. The 4th petitioner has also appeared for the 5th Semester examination. In that examination also he applied for revaluation of the papers, Linear Integrated Circuits and Electromagnetic Field Theory, vide Exhibit P20. 5. The petitioners have also applied for xerox copy of the respective answer scripts submitted by them for revaluation. All the petitioners remitted the required fee for revaluation also. Seeking for a revaluation within a time frame, this Writ Petition has been filed. 6. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the University. There will be a direction to the University to process the applications for revaluation submitted by the petitioners and W.P.(C)No.8677/10 -3- communicate the results within a period of eight weeks from today, if the applications and the payments are in order. There will be a further direction to issue xerox copy of the answer sheets, which also will be issued by the University to the petitioners within a period of one month. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE dsn