IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 4TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 13TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 32335 of 2008(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ADV.D.SREEKUMAR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, KAUSTHUBHAM, PARLIKAD.P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.D.SOMASUNDARAM RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. MUNDATHICODE GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MUNDATHIACODE.P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, MUNDATHICODE GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MUNDATHICODE.P.O. 3. SRI.PRABHAKARAN, PADATTIL HOUSE, PARLIKAD.P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 4. SRI.K.AJITH KUMAR, FORMER PANCHAYATH PRESIDENT, KARUMATHIL HOUSE, MUNDATHICODE.P.O,THRISSUR DISTRICT-680595. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/11/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.32335 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of November, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner is challenging Ext.P2 notice, whereby the petitioner has been directed to show cause why the construction made by the petitioner should not be demolished on the ground that the same is unauthorised. 2. I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition in so far as Ext.P2 is only a show cause notice to which the petitioner has filed Ext.P3 objections. That being so, no further proceedings can be taken by the Panchayat pursuant to Ext.P2 until final orders are passed, after considering Ext.P3 objections also. However, I make it clear that the final orders, if adverse to the petitioner, shall not be implemented for a period of two weeks to enable the petitioner to seek appellate remedies. The writ petition is disposed of as above. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd