IN THE HIGH COURT OF ,IUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, V CHHATTISGARH n x mge gmh»; MISC. APPEAL NO. , - OF 2006 APPELLANT/ p Krishna Kumar, S/o Late Gulab (,PLAINTIFF Singh Bardiya, Agedr about 65 years, R/o Village Barda, Tehsil ‘ & District Durg (Chhattisgarh). Versu$ RE§PONDENTS/ DEFENDANTS LII Dinesh Kumar, S/o Late Nepal g“ Singh Bardiya, Aged ab'out years. Pyarelal, ‘S/o Late Nepal Bardiya, Aged about 52 years. Smt. Lona Bai, W/o Late ', Singh Bardiya, Aged about years. $az‘lg¢‘\3\3( Respondents N0. 1 to 3 resident Q:v wea" 2 v Q‘ ’53P” I of Vinage & Post orace Barda, Tehsil & District (Chhattisgarh). Q/g ’4. Sohanlal, S/o Late Jetmal Jain, K Aged about 47 years. LE é. Suresh Kumar, S/o Late Jetmal '"V Jain, Aged about 45 years. Pgo. Sandeep Kumar Jain, S/o Rajendra Kumar Jain, Aged about 26 years. Respondents No. 4 to 6 resident of Jain Mandir Road, Dur‘g, Ward No.32, Tehsil & District. Durg (Chhattisgarh). Péwan Kumar, S/o Late Vikram Singh Bardiya, Aged about 55‘ years, R/o villag€ Barar, Post Barar, Tehsil Patan, District Durg . , (Chhattisgarh). ‘ Smt. Chandrakala, W/o Late Puran Kumar Bardiya, .Aged abmit 60 years. hanshyam, S/or Late Puran Kumar Bardiya, Aged about 18 years. ‘ RespOndents N0. 8 & 9 resident of Village Barda,‘ ’Post Offlce “Kutrel, Tehsil & District Durg (Chhattisgarh). Smt. Chitrarekha, VD/o Late Puran ”Kumar‘ Bardiya,rAged about 307 years,“ W/ov Chandlika Prasad, R/o Tikri, Post Arjunda, Tehsil 'Gundardehi, District Durg r (Chhattisgarh). . Smt. Sushma, D/o Late Puran Kumar, Aged about 28 years, W/o‘ Mahendra ’Belchandan, R/o Village Barda, Tehsil & District Durg (Chhattisgarh). Smt. Geeteshwali, D/o Late Puran Kumar Bardiya, Aged about 25 years, W/o Langeshwar, R/o Anjora (Daba), Post Nagpura, Tehsil & District Durg (Chhattisgarh). ' Smt.- Hemlata, D/o Late Puran ' Kumar Bardiya, Aged about 23 12. years, W/o Balla Deshmukh, R/o Pachripara, Durg (Desh Kiran Stores), Tehsil & District Durg (Chhattisgarh). G v . ,W Sahu 1 \qa. mm 3m: Ice 25.3.2010 Shri HS Patel, Advocate for S‘hri Malay Shrivastava, Adv Shri Uttam Pandey, Advocat e for respondent No. 4 to 6. 1/ Learned counsel appearing mmviwm $ai§mm “mm mq/ 91......................mzooa ‘mm<w> ‘ ‘ amaT the ‘lappeilant. ocate for respondent No. 1 to 3. Accordingly, the appeal is diaposed of and it is directed that the trial court shall decide the suit as early as possible preferably within a period of one year from the receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs. Sd/- N.K.Agarwai Judge ammo Mar gm? omen-er ~—r‘S/14"7_2/2om ~1 ,oo,ooo. >\ for the appellant submits that this appeal may be disposed of directing the trial court to decide the case within a stipulated time. . Prayer is allowed.