T»( ^' HtGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ^titjonISLNo_367Sof.2007 R.P. Tiwari, S/o Late Shri Ramkhilawan, Tiwari, aged about 60 years, R/o Qt. No.59 ,Mohan Nagar, Durg, DlstrictDurg tespondents Versus 1. State ofChhattisgarh Through - Secrfetary Department of Higher Education, Raipur - (C.Gj 2. ComBissioner, Directorate of Higher Edueation Ratpur (C.G.) 3. Principa!, Seth Ratan Chand Surana Arts and CommeroeCollege, Durg (C.G.) (Writ PetitionunderArticie 226/227 ofthe Constitution of india) Sinale Bench: Hon'bieJusticeSatish K. Aanihotri Ol•esent Shri Manish Upadhyay, counsel forthe petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. (Passed on 29" June, 2007) The petitioner by order dated 06.03.1884 (AnnexureP -4) was ippointed as Physical Training Instructor by the respondent - College. Thereafter, he was designated as Sports Offlcer. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by She judgment and order dated 05.11.2003 (Annsxure P-5) passed by this in W.P. No.1116/2003 (Appa Rao Thite Vs. State of Chhattisgarh& others), wherein it is stated that the Sports Officer comes within the definition of'teacher' and as such they are entitled to continue up to the age of 62 yeare in servlce. agpnf inoqiu§v"»qsPBS t -fps t , •s»oejsqi ^o uoseoyijaA 0} pslqns'aseo ps}e}sejo,s ui pis.q usaq seq se suus} siues 34} ui p pssodsip si uoitBsd 514} 'snql •{? •S}3E^8AOqe sij} 8}nds;p }ou saop siuspuodssj gq} joj issunoo psujesi •e •p8uo4usiu8jo^e se 'A|ue|iU!!S p|gq sey (qBuis Jei|pijjni •SA SJ34}0 y qjeBsiyeqqo ^o s}e?s) 200Z/Z08l'ON d'M ui psssed ;"90'OS pstep jspjo Aq ynoo siq} jo qousg UOIS!AIQ y 'Z