<L^ 'lOTS) THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT -l _^2°LfcG_ /2011 Rajiv Kumar Kulshresth, aged about 59 years, S/o Late J.P.Kulshresth, Assistant Fisheries Officer, Block Pussore, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) :1. v->< ^y^^- ...^ 0\r.^^:<. ^s^ State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Agricultural ( Fisheries ) Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director, Fisheries Department, Raipur(C.G.) Joint Director, Treasury, Account & Pension, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.) Assista.nt Director, Fisheries Raigarh (C.G.) WRITPETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OFTHE 2. 3. sn^ vs K-ti'* wi an*?i shtii'sb '?ST "i)|A|i<-i<i, tSiTi1y4ifi, [sicii<-ilj,< —.....^:£s.:..so'i.c/ sil^r TR^ ('^3^1) SB : HON'BLE MR. JUSflICE PRTTINKER DIWAKER 25.07.2011 Shri Pravin Das,.Dy. petitioner is entitled f6 ^rai^'fri •WCT •if1sld ^R?R ^siRmsii^T Shri Dhani Ram Pat^l, counsel for the pelttioner. G.A. for the State. Counsel for the |j)etitioner submlts that the two Kramonnaties as per circular dated 19.04.200p and 14.01.2003 (Annexure P-3) after completion of (.2 & 24 years of service. He submits that the issue int/olved in the present petition has aiready been conside|-ed and decided by this Court in the matter of R. S. v^rma v. State of Chhattisgarh and others (W.P. No.2405/2002) by judgment and order dated 29.08.2006. He further submits that the petitioner may be gr^nted liberty to make a representation to considejr the case of the petitioner in the llght of the judgmen^: passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of St^te of Tripura and Others v. K. K. Roy (2004 SCW/1) aijld the order passed In R. S. Verma (supra) to whi<|;h leamed counsel for the respondent/State has no Accordingly, the the concerned authorityl objection. Iberty sought for by the petitioner is granted to i|nake a representation before It is expected from the iiiiufl<iiisnfltlii"iififl, (rawpira—FS/140—2/2011—1,50,000. n XI-HC—78 s^ss ^n l<;.)ick tT%H Sff^T s»)^f!q) s> 'S'ST '^wiv\''i, ®xily'is,fs<<niyy,< ..w.:f±:.2t'^l<L. 311^'T'traqT (• y) TOnWHfeisn^i rec^ipt competent authorlty to Ihe petltion^r as objective manner preferabl^ months from the date of In view of above, the the aforesaid tiberty. It is made clear that any opinlon on the merits of| concerned would be at representation strictly in scrutiny of the facts. the representatlon of expediti^usly as possibte in an within a period of four of copy of this order. lietition is disposed of with ^F^^T^M 'RTtTcff ^f 'fe^ <f^l^l< ^ratRnaiT^f th|is court has not expressed |the case and the authority liberty to declde the accbrdance with law after due Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge