C.R. No. 6760 of 2010 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 6760 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 17, 2011 Jagjit Singh …..Petitioner Vs. Paramjit Singh and others …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr. A.S. Sivia, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Vide impugned order dated September 10, 2010, an application filed by the petitioner, legal representative of defendant has been dismissed seeking for a direction to re-summon Ravinder Singh to give his specimen writing in order to compare the same with the hand-writing in the body of the pronote and receipt. While dismissing the application, the learned trial Judge has observed that the plaintiff was examined and cross-examined by Sh.K.N. Gupta, Advocate at length on July 23, 2009. During the said C.R. No. 6760 of 2010 (O&M) [2] examination, the defendant did not request orally or through an application for seeking a direction to PW1 to give specific hand-writing for the purpose of comparison with the body writing of the pronote and the receipt in dispute. I have considered the facts and circumstances of this case. The petitioner-defendant does not seem to have made a prayer for comparison of the signatures on the pronote. Permission to compare the hand-written in the body of the pronote and receipt would not serve any purpose. The application seems to have been filed by the LRs of the defendant just to prolong the proceedings. No ground is made out for interference in the impugned order. Without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to produce evidence in support of the pleas taken in the written statement , this petition is dismissed. January 17, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE