1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2885 OF 2010 (Chandrashekhar Pandurang Thakre & Anr. vs. Pusad Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. JULY 20, 2010. Heard Shri Rode, learned counsel for the petitioners – employees and Shri Sambre, learned counsel for the respondent. Shri Rode, learned counsel points out that he has filed an application for amendment of petition. Shri Sambre, learned counsel has no objection, if the amendment is allowed. Accordingly, application for amendment is allowed. The necessary amendment be carried out by 27th July 2010. The challenge in present writ petition is to the order dated 11.06.2010 whereby the Industrial Court has refused to say transfer orders. The learned counsel contends that both the petitioners are active members of Trade Union and, therefore, have been victimized by sending them to outstation places located at a distance of 170 to 180 Kms. According to him, the learned Member of Industrial Court has not appreciated this position correctly. 2 Shri Sambre, learned counsel points out that the Industrial Court has specifically found that there was nothing before it to indicate that the petitioners were active members of Trade Union. He has taken the Court through the relevant observations. With the assistance of both counsel, I have perused the impugned order. The Industrial Court has found that not only the petitioners before this Court but several other employees were transferred by the employer. It also found that the petitioners could not show to it that they were active members of Trade Union. Because of these findings, it has rejected prayer for interim relief. The findings do not appear to be erroneous or perverse. Hence, no case is made out for interference in writ jurisdiction. The proceedings in Complaint ULP No. 25/2010 & 26/2010 filed by the petitioners are expedited. The Industrial Court shall attempt to decide the same as early as possible and in any case by 31st December 2010. At this stage, Shri Rode, learned counsel states that the wards of the petitioners are already admitted in the School at Arni and if they are required to join at other place, their education will be adversely affected. Shri Sambre, learned counsel points out that the transfer orders were issued well within time in the month of May 2010 itself. 3 I, therefore, find that the grievance made by Shri Rode, learned counsel, cannot be used to stay the transfer orders which are prima facie found to be legal and valid. With the directions to expedite the complaints as above, writ petition is rejected. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.