IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16077 of 2009 1. LEELAWATI DEVI W/O SRI SURESH MAHTO, R/O VILL- SURAHIYAN, P.O-BARHARIYA, P.S-BARHARIYA, DISTT- SIWAN Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT RAJ, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER CHAPRA DIVISION, CHAPRA 5. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SIWAN 6. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT RAJ OFFICER, SIWAN 7. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SADAR, SIWAN 8. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER-CUM-EXECUTIVE OFFICER, BLOCK-BARHARIYA, DISTT- SIWAN 9. THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSION, BIHAR, REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS SECRETARY SONE BHAWAN, 3RD FLOOR, VEERCHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA-800001 10. THE SECRETARY, STATE ELECTION COMMISSION, BIHAR, SONE BHAWA, 3RD FLOOR, VEERCHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA- 800001 11. SRI BADDUD AHMAD, SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SIWAN 12. SHRI NAUSHAD ALAM, D.P.R.O.-CUM - SUPERVISOR FOR THE ELECTION OF PRAMUKH, PANCHAYAT SAMITI, BARHAIRYA, SIWAN 13. SMT. SHAMA PARWEEN, W/O MD. MAHBOOB HASAN ANSARI, R/O VILL- KOIRI TOLA, P.O + P.S- BARHARIYA, PRAMUKH, BLOCK- BARHARIYA, DISTT- SIWAN ----------- 6. 25.01.2011 None for the petitioner. While respondent nos. 11 and 12 are officials, the primary relief claimed is against private respondent no.13. In view of the fact that the writ petition has been dismissed for non-compliance with regard to the said respondents, the writ petition has become infructuous and perhaps for that reason the writ petitioner has lost interest. The application has become infructuous. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)