-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.796 of 2008 Hoogly Ink Company (Bombay) Ltd. ..Petitioner vs. 1. Madhusudan Brijlal Vakharia and others ..Respondents Shri R.M.Haridas for petitioner. Shri Hiralal Thacker,Sr.Advocate i/b Shri S.J.Daruwala for respondent nos. 1 and 2. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. 8th February, 2008 8th February, 2008 8th February, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This writ petition is directed against the order passed by the Trial Court on 14th December, 2007 on Revision Application No.55 of 2007 in Interim Notice No.2531 of 2006 in RAE and R Suit No.1340/4212 of 1987. 2. By the said Interim Notice the original plaintiffs had prayed for keeping the suit for arguments and the said notice was made absolute by the learned Trial Court. Lower Appellate Court has confirmed the said order by discharging rule in Revision Application No.55 of 2007 by the impugned order. -2- 3. The petitioner claims to be a tenant in respect of the suit premises and further claims to be in possession prior to 1st February, 1973. The suit has been filed by respondent nos.1 to 3 against the petitioner for possession on ground of subletting amongst others. 4. Upon perusal of the impugned order, I am satisfied that the learned Judge has not committed any error in rejecting the prayer in the revision application. In such circumstances, there is no reason to interfere with the order under challenge which allows the plaintiffs’s request to place the 1987 suit for arguments. Petition is dismissed. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.)