IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1744 of 2008 SITLA DEVI Versus RUKMINA DEVI & ORS ----------- 4. 15.9.2008. This application has been filed to transfer the Title Appeal No. 86 of 1998 pending in the court of Shri K. P. Verma, Additional District Judge-I, Buxar alleging therein that the petitioner’s counsel is not being allowed to argue the case of the petitioner. It has been submitted that Sri Nagendra Kumar, a senior Advocate of the court in Buxer is the counsel in the case and the allegation is that the counsel is not being permitted to place the facts of the case before the court. One has full faith in judicial officers and expects that they would proceed in accordance with law in disposal of the cases and also permit the counsels to place their cases, in a manner befitting to the own and the court’s dignity. In the circumstances, I do not think this is a fit case in which the court can exercise its power under Section 24 of the Code of the Civil Procedure. This application is dismissed with the aforesaid observations. U.K. (Sheema Ali Khan,J)