Cri. Apln. No. 1855/2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1855 OF 2011 Navnath Dalsingh Rathod ....Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ....Respondent. Miss. Rashmi P. Gour, Advocate for applicant. Mr. N.H. Borade, APP for respondents. CORAM : T. V. NALAWADE, J. DATED : 10th June, 2011. PER COURT : 1. This application is filed for regular bail in Cr. No. 49/2010 registered with Shivoor Police Station for offences punishable under sections 302, 120-B, 201 r/w. 34 of the Indian Penal Code. APP is ready with police papers. Both the sides are heard. 2. There are allegations against wife of the deceased and persons like present applicant that they came together for finishing the deceased. There are allegations that for consideration of Rs. 30,000/- some persons including the accused took the responsibility to finish the deceased. The deceased was in company of one witness More for some time and he had helped the deceased in contacting the present applicant on mobile Cri. Apln. No. 1855/2011 2 phone. Accused/applicant had come there with other person and they had taken the deceased with them. After that the deceased was not seen alive by nobody. The dead body of the deceased was found. The record produced show that there is one important witness like More in the present case and the prosecution will be relying on the aforesaid circumstantial evidence. 3. The advocate for the applicant submitted that the incident took place in the month of July 2010 and the applicant is behind bars since 6th of August 2010. In any case, there is sufficient material to make out prima facie case for offence punishable under section 302 of IPC. Some persons involved in immoral acts committed the murder of deceased, who had no enmity with them. Allegations are made that for petty consideration the murder was committed. In view of these circumstances, this Court holds that it is not a fit case for granting the bail. Hence, the application stands rejected. These observations will not come in the way of Trial Court while deciding the case. [ T. V. NALAWADE, J.] ssc/criapln1855.11