.. 1 .. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3302 OF 2008 Mr. Nitesh H. Jain .... Plaintiff V/s. Mr. Nagesh Pandurang Bandekar .... Defendant Ms. Nita Solanki i/b Kiran Jain & Co. for Plaintiff. None for the Defendant. CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATED : 17th MARCH 2009 P.C. : This is a Suit for recovery of amount. The Defendant executed a Demand Promissory Note dated 15th July 2008 for a sum of Rs. 75,000/- in favour of Plaintiff for the valuable consideration received by him in cash. Despite demands to refund the amount, the Defendant failed to do so. Ultimately, a legal notice was sent on 7th October 2008, but in vain. The Suit came to be filed on 1st December 2008. Despite service of summons, the Defendant remained absent. The Plaintiff has tendered on record .. 2 .. original documents. So, whatever is stated in the plaint and through the document has gone unchallenged on record and the Defendant is deemed to have admitted the same. The case of the Plaintiff deserves to be believed and the Suit deserves to be decreed. The Suit stands decreed as prayed for. However, the rate of interest on the amount due from the date of the Suit till the amount is recovered shall be simple interest at the rate of 9% per annum. (A.V. NIRGUDE, J.)