FAO No. 346 of 2010 22.7.2011 Present: Ms. Seema Sood, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.5. Mr. Puneet Advocate vice Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Advocate, for respondent No.7. CMP(M) No. 878 of 2010 Heard. This application is cryptic and does not state anything as to why delay of 191 days has occurred in filing the present appeal. It does not contain any pleading regarding delay. However, I considered the submission of the learned counsel in order to satisfy my conscience as to whether the award passed by the Commissioner under the Workmen Compensation’s Act meets the requirement of law. In these circumstances, this application is allowed and delay in filing the appeal is condoned. FAO No. 346 of 2010 Record received. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. The questions raised by the appellant herein for determination have been settled and determined by the Commissioner after recording evidence and having granted the chance to each of the parties to lead evidence. Therefore, I do not find any illegality in the findings so arrived at by the Commissioner. On the question of grant of interest, the case is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in FAO No. 97 of 2011 titled as ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Meena Devi and others decided on 31st March, 2011. Appeal is dismissed. July 22, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), (ms) Judge