(^:2^ KBffiH ^ r 2. IN THE HON'BLE 1-II6H COURT OF CHHATTES6ARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITCON (S) N0. l6(i'^~ /2Q11 PETTnONER : ^ Ramkn'shna Pandey, S/o Moti Lal Pandey, aged about 61 years, Retired employee R/o Village Chandrapur, Tahsil Dabhra, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^: 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary, Education Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.). The Senior Account Officer, Through ; Office of Accountant General, Raipur, District ; Raipur (C.6-). -3. The Joint Director, Treasury, Account and Pension Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) ^4. The District Treasurer Officer, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 5. The District Education Officer, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) ^6. The Block Education Officer, Pusore, Distt. Raigarh (C.6.) WRIT PETETEON UNDER ARTECLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTETUTEON OF IN&IA '- The petitioner named above, most humbly and respectfully ^^^ <^^y '^^y '•^.. HIGH COURT OF CHHATfISGARH AT BILASPUR WR1T PETITION (S) No. 1687 of2011 PETmONER RESPQNDENTS Ramkrishna Pandey. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Me Shri Satish K. Aenihotri, J. Present: Shri P.K.Patel, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S.Thafa.ir, Deputy Advoeate General forthe State. Shri R.S.Baghel, Advocate tor the respondent No. 2. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 29th dayofMarch.2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearmg for the petitioner submits that the case, being payment of retiral benefits matter, may be referred to the pension commlttee. 2. This Court, in the matter of W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal v. The State of ChhaWsmrh & Others) and ofher connected matters. directed the Committee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar v. State Gcwemment and others) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (Stete of Chhattisgarh i& Others v. Baimath Mandal and another). Thus, this petition 1s squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31st of Januao', 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642/2004 Baynath '<t& ^ *a 8 "9/ Y Mandal (supra) as submitted by leamed counsel appearing for the parties. 3. This petition is accordinglv disposed ofin the same terms i.e. the office of the Advocate Genei-al is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date ofreceipt ofa copy offhe petition irom the petitioner and this order. Thereafter, the Conmuttee shall issue notice to the petitioner and the ofScers concemed, within a further period of 15 days. The Committee sliall consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after afifording proper opportunity ofhearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concemed may file additional documents, ifnecessar^'. The entire exercise, mcluding payment ofretiral dues, ifany, to fhe petitioner be completed within a period of six weeks fi-om the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. 4. The petitioner shall supply extra copy ofthe petition to the learned counsel appearing for the respondents for forwarding the same to the Committee. ~—^^- Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit