... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.772 OF 2003 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri Kishor Patil i/by Shri P.N. Joshi for the Appellants. Shri Ramesh Dube-Patil for the Respondent No.1a. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : JULY 25, 2006. : JULY 25, 2006. : JULY 25, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate appearing for the Appellants. The Appellants are the original defendants. The Trial Court passed a decree for specific performance against the Appellants. The decree for specific performance has been confirmed in the Appeal by the District Court. After having heard the submissions of the Advocates appearing on the behalf of the parties, I find that there are concurrent findings of fact recorded by the courts below. The concurrent findings of fact are based on appreciation of oral and documentary evidence on record. No substantial question of law arises. Second Appeal is dismissed with no orders as to costs. ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE