IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO. 1 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 514 OF 2007 MS. CECELIA LISBOA THROUGH ATTORNEY MR. KRISHNA GHATE ... Applicant Versus THE DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATS AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Valmiki Menezes, Advocate for the Applicant. Coram:- R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 26th March, 2008 P.C.: Affidavit filed by Advocate Ms. M. Conception is taken on record. 2. Heard. Only grievance which is sought to be made on behlaf of the applicant is that even on earlier occasion when party had approached this Court, opportunity was given to the concerned party to seek regularization from the Panchayat and that the report by the Directorate of Panchayat disclosed that though the Panchayat has claimed that there is already declaration granted, there was in fact no such decision taken by the Panchayat and in any case, regularization is not permissible in the absence of necessary NOC by various other departments. 3. By the order dated 26/11/2007, this Court has given opportunity to the party to move the Village Panchayat for necessary regularization. Needless to say that the concerned Authority has to take into consideration all the provisions of law before granting regularization and has to ascertain whether the construction satisfies all the provisions of law in force in the State. Merely because on earlier occasion opportunity was given and by order dated 26/11/2007, again fresh opportunity is given to seek regularization, that itself cannot be said to be an error apparent on the face of record so as to require review of the order. Hence, there is no case made out for review of the order dated 26/11/2007. Therefore, the review application is rejected. R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. NH