: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4695 OF 2010 Panchand Jethanand Gudkha & Anr. .. Petitioners V/s. Kanhayya Jamuna Rajbhar .. Respondent Mr. A.S. Rao for the Petitioners. None for the Respondent. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 21 ST JUNE, 2010. P.C.: 1. The Writ Petition has been preferred against the Award passed by the Labour Court, Thane on 30th January, 2010 in Reference (IDA) No.397 of 2005. By this Award, the Labour Court has granted the respondent-workman reinstatement with continuity of service and full back wages. The Labour Court has considered the fact that the petitioner did not issue appointment letters to any of its workmen. The Labour Court has also accepted the evidence of the witness of the petitioners that muster rolls and the wage registers were maintained by the petitioners. The Labour Court has also noted that : 2 : the possession receipt on which the petitioners rely to show that they did not continue any longer with the business of power looms as they have returned the power looms to the owner could not be accepted as the document appeared to be fabricated. The Labour Court noted that the written statement was filed on 19th April, 2007 whereas so called possession receipt was dated 30th May, 2007. 2. In my view, the Labour Court has considered all the necessary factors while deciding the Reference (IDA) No.397 of 2005. I, therefore, do not think it necessary to interfere with the Award, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, passed by the Labour Court, Thane on 30th January, 2010 in Reference (IDA) No.397 of 2005. There is no perversity in the award which is based on the evidence before the Labour Court. 3. The Writ Petition is dismissed.