1 CP-594-10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 594 OF 2010 Bhanudas Shankar Wanave ... Petitioner vs. Rayat Shikshan Sanstha ... Respondents Mr. Amogh Paralikar,Advocate, for the petitioner Mr.Milind Deshmukh,Advocate for the respondents. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 18th July, 2011. P.C. 1. The learned Counsel for the petitioner makes a statement that the petitioner has been reinstated and the salary has also been paid to him in compliance with the consent terms. He states that the petitioner was not liable to pay professional tax, but it has been wrongly deducted. The learned Counsel for the respondents makes a statement that if the petitioner is not liable, the respondents will take steps for refund of that amount. In view of this, nothing remains. Contempt Petition stands disposed of. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)