THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 4862 of 2007 Dated: 09.03.2007 Between: T.M. Kalinga Raju. .... PETITIONER AND The Board of Governors, A.P. Residential Educational Institutions Society, rep. by its Vice Chairman-cum-Secretary, Education Department, Government of A.P., Secretariat, Hyderabad and another. .....RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 4862 of 2007 ORDER The petitioner states that he was appointed as Post Graduate Teacher in Physical Science in respondent-School to teach 8th to 10th Classes, and subsequently, he was posted as Junior Lecturer to teach intermediate students. He further states that in view of the interim orders passed in W.P.No.15073 of 1993 filed by him along with two others, he continued as Junior Lecturer for some time, and after dismissal of the said writ petition, the 2nd respondent has issued proceedings dated 01.07.2004, posting him back as Post Graduate Teacher, and further proceedings dated 17.07.2004 retaining him at APR Junior College, Nimmakur till the end of academic year i.e, 2006-2007. Questioning the said proceedings, the present writ petition is filed seeking regularization of his services as Junior Lecturer. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is submitted by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents that the subject matter of this writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in CHITTI SIMHACHALAM NAIDU v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS, ANDHRA PRADESH RESIDENTIAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS SOCIETY, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD[1]. 3. Admittedly, the petitioner was appointed as Post Graduate Teacher and thereafter, he was permitted to teach as Junior Lecturer without any promotion order. When the petitioner was permitted to teach as Junior Lecturer without any promotion order, he cannot be allowed to contend that his services deserve to be regularized as Junior Lecturer. In CHITTI SIMHACHALAM NAIDU’s case ( 1 supra), this Court has rejected similar claim for regularization of the Post Graduate Teachers as Junior Lecturers, and observed that the order under which they were appointed as Junior Lecturers do not confer any right upon the petitioners to be appointed to the said post, nor were they entitled to be appointed as such in accordance with any Rules. In that view of the matter, no direction can be given to the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner as Junior Lecturer. 4. In the circumstances of the case, following the judgment of this Court in CHITTI SIMHACHALAM NAIDU’s case, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. ________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 09.03.2007 sj [1] 1999(6) ALT 308