'•.•"•••S'K'^!e~W^9Sses!Si'SS^^SSSI ^) ^.^/^/ TIN THg HlGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGAKH AT BILASPUR W.P. I'S'l N0. 'Tr'^_^_j_ / 2006 Jfeuuoner ^ 0 <j^-;'^-y^ ,..--•; ^'t"' <AW ^1-' <?v>''.-.c"ft" ....• Versus ^s .-Kesponaents /-- Raj Kuruar Sai S/o Late UOKUI yai, Aged about 38 years R/o Village T&pkara, TeJ'isil - KurLlsun, Dist: Jahspur-(C.G.) ^l. State of Chhattisgarh "rnrougn - 'rne upper yecretaiy Panchayat and Rural Development Departraent,D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Dist: Raipur-fC.G.) "2. The Director Panchayat & Social Welfare D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur Dist: Raipi.u--(C.O.) 3. The Dy.Director, pancnayat and yociai weuare •Jashpiir, Dist: Jashpur-iC.G.j 4. Tlie Chief Executive Officer, janpaa J-'ancnayat, Farsabahar, Dist: Jashpur-fC.O.) WRIT PETITlON U/A 226 / 227 OF THE CONS'TITUTiON OF INDlA ^' XI-HC-78 3:5? •^WW<, Vn!\Wt6, Rlrtiyy irmwg^riw •^-1^G-•^^-^ ancRT lra^? (l?f3gS8T) ?n; ^ a-n^TwR-ii* craTsn^Ta'ii't' S?BTgT<lf?cf3TI^T 18.8.2008:- 2006 Shri Arun Shukla, counsel fo)' Shri Satish Gupta, respondents No.1 to 3, on advance] Heard both the counsel. By this petition, the petitior|< Annexure-P/1 dated 30 June from Farsabahar, District Jashpur tc| The petitioner is working as The grievance of the petitiorjer of the petitioner is working as a T^ Janpad Panchayat and she is treatment is being taken up at empioyee which is district leve! po; out of the district. In the circumstances, iearne|d that the petitioner may be allowed ti|> No.1 and he be directed to decl respondents has no objection. Having heard learned couns^l facts and circumstances of the cas^, on the merit of the case, the peti| representation along with a copy o(] respondent No.1 within a period respondent No.1 shall decide the days from the date of receipt of th^ the points raised by the petitioner, ir( the petitioner. Depufy Govt. Advocate for the State/ :opy. irt •*i^[i'i41-< Mi^dTtrte^l'<Ri<.<;i< ^T Sff^Fq'3TT^T |er has challenged his transfer order whereby he has been transferred District Dantewada. (pram Sahayak. is that in the first instance the wife iacher at Kandaibahar in Farsabahar (iso suffering from Anemia and the Tlapkara. The petitoenr is a Class-3 tt, therefore, he cannot be transferred counsel for the petitioner submitfed make a representation to respondent |de the same, to which counset for ^l for the parties, having regard to the a, and without expressing any opinion itioner is altowed to mak'e a detailed this writ petition and its annexures to |of 10 days from today and in turn, Irepresentation within a period of 30 i^ representation, after considering ali accordance with law. P.T.O. XI-HC-78 3^ '^ww-f, yi-rflu'Ko, (stdi'Hy +11^WI SffflKb ^200 Sll^l i^cti ('ictl3Gli<,iT) sn^r^Tf^iR; (raTsn^rshiiti 'TU Ban/e ?T<ITW:flf?(T3n^T rg^ — ahd In the meantime, the effect respect of the petitioner shall remaih petitioner is decided. With the direction aforesaid, Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.: Parties are entitled for certifiey the petition stands disposed of. 3P80/2006 also stands disposed of. copy of this order. *i'iiffi41-i Hiti(iT^'teirit'<Ri+di< ^aTf^Tsn^r operation of the impugned order in stayed, ti!l the representation of the Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge P.T.O.