bam§ILE wimd‘ LfwJ/ y IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (c.G.) w.P. <0No. HL%§ [2006 PETITIONER r”: Smt. Subbmma Aged about 55 years W/o. Late Marimuthu R/o. 91-D, Rishali Sector, Bhilai Nagar, District Durg (C.G.). VERSUS :1. The Managing Director Bhilai Steel Plant, Bhilai District Durg (C.G.) RESPONDENTS /2. Estate Officer Town- Service Building First Floor, Indra Place, Bhilai Steel Plant, Bhilai (C.G.) /3. Dy. General Manager (Town Administration) Town Administration Dept. ‘ Bhilai Steel Plant, Bhilai District Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ® HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR : HB ATI I ON’LE MR. Sgl-I Ix, ACNIHOTRI WRIT PETITION 1C.) NO.4285 OF 2006 Petitioner Smt, Subbmma vel‘SUS The Managmg D1rector W Bh11a1 Steel Plant, Bh1la1 and others Present : Mr. Raghvendm Pradhan counsel for the pentloner ORDER (Passed on 29 of August 2006) The petitioner i3 Widow of the deceased — employee, namely, Late Mr. Marimuthu, who was working as Senior Operator Grade-H (CR) (3—9) and retired from service on 31 appears that the petitioner applied for grant of official quarter allotted to her late husharid under the scheme known as “SAIL Scheme for Leasing of Houses to Employees? 2002”. The petitioner has tiled this petition for following relief :- $4997. It 3:9 view of the fact that late husband of the petitioner retired on 31-8- 1997 and the petitioner has tiled this petition on 8-8-2006 seeking a direction against the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from Quarter No.91-D, Rishali' Sector, Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.)_ It appears that the petitioner is in unauthorized occupation of the official accommodation. This Court, in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, cannot permit illegal i s : r “7.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may be kind enough issue %} to a wn't in the nature of Mandamus directing the 7 respondent authorities not to dispossess petitioner nom the quarter No~91—D Rishali Sector Bhilai District Durg (C.G.). K 7.2 That, the Hon’ble Court V may also be kind enough to direct the respondent authorities not to further disturb the possession of the petitioner' over the said land. 7‘3 That, Any other relief which may suitable in the facts and circumstances i of the case may also be allowed, 7.4 Saddle the. tcost ' of the petition on the respondent authorities.” 2. The occupation of the official accommodation by the widow of the deceased — employee. 3. Hence, this petition is dismissed accordingly. However, the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation, if so advised, for any other relief which is permissibie in law. NO order as to costs, Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Certified copy as per mlea. i l l