IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH JUNE 2008 / 28TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 15617 of 2008(H) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ ASHRAF, S/O. PAREEKUTTY, KALAPPATT HOUSE, P.O. KAMMANAM, KALPAKANCHERY, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.G.HARIHARAN RESPONDENT: ----------------------- SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. K.V.MANOJKUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).15617/2008-H APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECREATARY RTA MALAPPURAM DATED 28/04/1998. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 15/05/2008 FILED BY THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL // TRUE COPY // Rs/ ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) 15617 of 2008 -------------------------------------------------------- Dated: JUNE 18, 2008 JUDGMENT What is sought for in this writ petition is a direction to consider Ext.P2, which is stated to be an application submitted by the petitioner for revision of his own timings. 2. On instructions the learned Government Pleader submits that the application was incomplete in as much as it did not contain the signature of the applicant. According to the learned Government Pleader, for that reason the application was returned to the party and was not accepted in file. 3. Going by what the learned Government Pleader submits, the application is not pending. If that be so, the direction sought for requiring consideration of Ext.P2 cannot be issued. In view of this, clarifying that it will be open to the petitioner to make a fresh application, in which event, it will be considered in accordance with law, the writ petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE mt/-