C.R. No.4457 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 10.08.2009 Kulwant Singh .....Petitioner versus Avinash Kumar .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Ramneek Vasudeva, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner-tenant is aggrieved at the order dated 13.6.2009, passed by the Rent Controller, Ropar, whereby his application for additional evidence has been dismissed. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the present revision petition on merits, provided that it is clarified that the observations made by the learned Rent Controller are tentative in nature and shall have no bearing on the merits of the case. There can indeed be no doubt that the observations made by the learned Rent Controller in the impugned order dated 13.6.2009 are purely C.R. No.4457 of 2009 2 tentative and shall have no bearing while deciding the eviction petition on merits. The revision petition stands disposed of accordingly. 10-08-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE