IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.467 of 2009 1. Prabhu Narayan Singh, son of Kapildeo Singh. 2. Nanda Singh, son of Kapildeo Singh. Both are residents of village- Karbandia, P.O. and Police Station Chainpur, District- Kaimur. ……Plaintiffs……Petitioners. Versus 1(a) Most. Radhika Kuer, wife of deceased (Shyama Singh). 1(b) Usha Devi. D/o deceased 1(c) Puspa Devi, D/o deceased 1(d) Nilu Devi, D/o deceased 1(e) Roma Devi, D/o deceased. 2. Krishna Singh @ Guddu Singh, son of Shyama Singh. 3. Sudami Devi, W/o Sudama Singh. 4. Kedar Singh, son of Sudama Singh. 5. Surendra Singh, son of Sudama Singh. 6. Anish Singh, s/o Kedar Singh. 7. Ajit Singh, son of Surendra Singh. 8. Ranjit Singh, son of Surendra Singh. 9. Kamata Singh @ Sri Kant Singh. 10. Lallu Singh,son of Kapildeo Singh. 11. Tara Singh @ Tarkeshwar Singh, son of Kapildeo Singh. 12. Shambhu Singh, son of Kapildeo Singh. 13. Rajgrih Singh, son of Kamata Singh. 14. Jitendra Singh, son of Lallu Singh. 15. Narendra Singh, son of Lallu Singh. 16. Ghirendra Singh, son of Lalu Singh. 17. Nanhe Singh @ Akhilesh Singh. 18. Anil Kumar Singh, son of Tara Singh. 19. Sunil Kumar Singh, son of Tara Singh. 20. Bachcha Bela, son of Nanhe Singh. 21. Prahlad Singh, son of Shambhu Singh. 22. Parwati Kuer, W/o late Kapildeo Singh. All residents of Mauza Bhabhua Ward No.18, Police Station and Anchal- Bhabhua, Police Station- Chainpur, District- Bhabhua Rohtas. 23. Kapildeo Singh, S/o Kuber Singh. 24. Nanda Singh, son of Kapildeo Singh. 25. Prabhu Singh, son of Kapildeo Singh. All are residents of Mauza Bhabhua Ward No.10, P.S. and Anchal- Bhabhua, Police Station- Chainpur, District- Bhabhua, Rohtas. 26. Bhagirathi Devi, W/o Baiju Singh, resident of Mauza Kabar, Police Station- Bhabhua, District- Bhabhua, Rohtas. 27. Sudama Pandey, son of Sri Ram Surat Pandey. 28. Tufani Pandey, son of Sri Ram Surat Pandey. All 27 & 28 R/o Mauza- Bhabua Ward No.10, P.S. & Anchal- Bhabhua, District – Kaimur (Bhabhua). 29. Smt. Damwanti Devi, W/o Shio Dular Singh, resident of Mauza- Amarhi, Police Station- Sonhan, District- Bhabhua. 2 30. Kailashi Devi, W/o Damari Noniya, resident of village- Khokhara, Police Station- Chainpur, District- Bhabhua, presently Sadar Bhabhua Ward No.6, Police Station- Bhabhua, District- Bhabhua. 31. Rama Nand Choubey, son of Sita Ram Choubey, resident of Mauza Karaha, Police Station- Sonhan, Distrit- Bhabhua, presently Sadar Bhabhua Ward No.6, Police Station and District- Bhabhua. 32. Lalmuni Devi, W/o Chirkut Sharma, resident of Mauza Dubauli, Police Station- Bhagwanpur, District- Bhabhua, presently Town Bhabhua Ward No.6, Police Station and District- Bhabhua. 33. Rajana Kuer, W/o Raghunash Sah, resident of Bhabhua, Ward No.1, Police Station and District- Bhabhua. 34. Hitlal Singh, son of Aliyar Singh, resident of Bhabhua Ward No.10, Police Station and District- Bhabhua. 35. Chandra Dev Dubey, son of Udit Narayan Deubey, resident of Mauza- Roop Nautiya, Police Station and District- Bhabhua. 36. Satya Narayan Prasad, son of Doma Seth, resident of Bhabhua Ward No.3, Police Station and District- Bhabhua. ….Defendant……Opp. Party 1st Set. 37. Sheshmuni Singh. 38. Shesh Nath Singh 39. Gopnath Singh @ Gopa Singh. 40. Kripal Singh. 41. Gariban Singh. 42. Amir Chand Singh. All sons of Nathuni Singh. 43. Dipak Singh, s/o Sheshmuni Singh. 44. Anil Singh. 45. Matukdhari Singh. 46. Chamcham Singh. sons of Dev Muni Singh. 47. Mantu Singh. 48. Uday Singh. sons of Shobhnath Singh. 49. Ranjit Singh, son of Amir Chand Singh. 50. Most. Bechana Kuer, W/o Nathuni Singh. 51. Deo Muni Singh, S/o Nathuni Singh. All residents of Mauza- Bhabhua Ward No.10, Police Station and Anchal- Bhabhua, District- Rohtas, Bhabhua. ….Plaintiff …….Opp. party 2nd Set. ----------- 07- 23.11.2011 None appears on behalf of the petitioner. This application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by the plaintiffs of Title 3 Suit No.63 of 1991, and are aggrieved by the order dated 6.12.2008, whereby permission to sell portion of the suit property, has been rejected. 2. We have perused the materials on record. It is evident that it is a suit of 1991. The plaintiffs filed an application for permission to sell a portion of the suit property which has been rejected on the ground that the suit was at the final stages of oral submissions and, therefore, it would unjust and improper to permit disposal of the suit property. We have also not been informed of the progress of the suit in the meanwhile. We entirely agree with the reasoning assigned by the learned trial court in rejecting the prayer. It is indeed a frivolous civil revision application 3. This Civil Revision application is dismissed. (S K Katriar, J.) S.K.Pathak/