- 1 - VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No. 5565 OF 2009 Arjun Kashinath Argade & Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Sanjeev P. Kadam, for the Petitioners. Mr. V. S. Gokhale, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. CORAM : D. D. SINHA & A. A. SAYED , JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 4, 2010. P.C. : . Heard the learned counsel for petitioners and learned AGP for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. The counsel for the petitioners states that the respondent in paragraph 4 of the affidavit has made following statements, which reads thus- “I state that the petitioner has preferred an application to the Commissioner, Pune Division Pune u/s 48(1) of the Land Acquisition Act for the deletion of land from acquisition proceedings. I state that the said application will pending before the Commissioner. I state that the said application will - 2 - be decided as per the law and after obtaining report from the District Resettlement Officer and the said application will be disposed off by passing a speaking order which will be communicated to the petitioner” . In view of the above statement of the respondent, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to take appropriate steps, if the decision is adverse to the petitioner. In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed. Sd/- [D. D. SINHA, J.] Sd/- [ A. A. SAYED, J.]