^ INI'HE HIGH COURT OF GHHATHSGARH AT mLASPUR M.A.NO. X^jl /2003 APBELLANT NidN-PLAINTIFF Rain Avfar, son of Banwari aged about 40 years, resident of Chilka, Tah. Baikunthpiu-, Distt. Korea(C.G.) SPONDENTS -^%^ ^.€^ :<>-'.rf* ^^' n<e:fw 'y ^/^ VERSUS 1) Smt. Manmati, daughter of Late Shri Subraj Singh, wife pf Saajan Singh, aged aboutSO years. ' ., 2) , Gokul Singh, son ofLate Shri Subraj Singh, aged about 71 years. 3) Dhanukdhari Srngh, son Qf Late Sfari Sufraj Singh, aged about 52: years. All resident of village Sai-Bhj), Ta]i. Baikunthpur, .Distt.KQre^E.G.^. ,' MISQELI^KffiSD;iaS.,AEE®^.'t,ffii:3®^^0^^^^ :TH^Bc®@:'^^sKaasE^^Eg%w'';^r':•'% -.<!S>.S»aUl*R«.»>JN ^•^^s^^^s titeHCOURTOFCHHATnSGARHATBILASPUR SintrteBench: Hon'bleShriJusticePraishantKunKU'Mishra APPELLANT RESPONDENTS MA.NoA81of2003 RamAvtar V^sys Smt. Manmati and crthere Ml^EtlJWEOUSAPI»E^^UNDER^SBH-ION43TO^1(D]tC£ Shri Shailenclra Sharma, coun^ for the appellant. ORAL ORDER 1(07.07.2840) Heard. . . ,'::: : : . :, : ' . (2) Thein^antappeaiynGlerC)FdCT43Rtrie1^of^P.G^^ directed against the order passea by the executing ©ourt on 3(f August 2W2, vsfterebytt»eaj^ellahigud^nenl drfrtOT^s (^e^fon to the listofpartitionpreipffl^byPatwarihasbeenrejec^ (3) Apparentty an S^ieaUtm under Order9 Rute 13 ofG.P.C. hss not been deaft wfth by the executing Gowt; theretorethis appeatunder Order 43 Rute 1(d) is not msunteinable. The e^)eat is therefore dismissecl as n<A maintainable. (4) Learned counsel for the ^ipellant prays Tor retumof certifiel copy of the order enabling him to take reeourse to stiGh proceedings undeTwhtehftreappellantmaych^engetheimpi^nedorder. (5) Prayer te allowed. Qertified copy of the itnpugned orderbe returr^ to ttie appetla^ on his supplyiTO a )^rw impugned ord|er intherecord oftt^ miscellaneouss^ieal. Sdf- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge