IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1907 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 1907 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 1907 OF 2006 Sharad Sampat .... Petitioner versus Union of India & ors. ... Respondents. Shri Ashok Singh with Mrs. S.Joshi i/b. M/s. H. Mehta & Co. for the petitioner. Shri S.S.Pakale with Y.S.Bhate for Respt. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.R.KINGAOKAR, V.R.KINGAOKAR, V.R.KINGAOKAR, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATED; DATED; DATED; 31st March, 2006. 31st March, 2006. 31st March, 2006. P.C: P.C: P.C: 1. By this petiion, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 5-1-2006 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange, New Delhi. The petitioner was put to contend by the appellate tribunal to deposit the amount payable by the petitioner to the department. The petitioner’s contention is that the petitioner is not in a financial position to make such deposit and the tribunal observed that in view of the fact that the flat of the petitioner is attached by the competent authority the amount of deposit is liable to be reduced by 50% and accordingly 45 days time was given to the petitioner to deposit the same amount. That period is over. Even till the date the deposit is not made. There is therefore no question to interfere with the order passed by the appellate authority. Accoridngly petition is dismissed. ...