BILASPUR Wl’yh W.P.N0. ii 77mm Lvf/i Peiiiioners : 1. Pmhlad Kmnar Chandel S/o Shri Khilawan Chandel, aged about 32 yeals, Rio Village Mandlatola, Post : Bodla, Tehsil : Kawardha, Dist : Kawardha a (CG) Tulsi Ram Paul S/o Pilu Ram Pati], aged about 34 yeals, R/o Gum Baddo Post Bodla, Tehsil : Kawardha, Dist : Kawarhda v (C.G.) Vishnu Prasad Shivas S/o Jhadi Ram Slnivas, aged about 343mm, R/o Raggu Pam, Post : Bodla, Tehsil :Kawardha, Dist : Kawardha — (C.G.) Versus Respondents : l. ¢é%ion of India through the Secretary Human Resource Development, New Delhi 2. K’séte of Chhamsgarh enough the G Pn'nciple Secretary School Education Department, DKS Bhawan Raipux : Dist :Raipm—(C.G.) 3. State ofMadhya Pxadesh through the Secretmy School Education Depaxtment Vallabh Bhawan Bhopal -— MP.) ( ow ~,A / : _l_l ~esi . o Kawdha Uptel’S ist a Mm ancat a, ecrl i da thrg ra , aha Secmy (31 aa Kwardha, Dist 5. . T}l §§3§“acigogiovg.g5 .339 ar . . ilBodl D a“ abol Phya Setay, Glam ouh Gm Kgtgo Panayt ts Pmayt Katgp; tax, am Kwr a CONSTIT INDIA OF . . . 223..:2§,§2§ a?§?§§2§2c ” WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE ,. . @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 1179 of 2002 PETITIONERS : Prahlad Kumar Chandel & Others. VERSUS : Union of India & Others. RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: rShri Kunal Das, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri R.Pradhan, Advocate for the respondent No. 1. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Dy. G.A. for the State/respondent No. 2. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 215‘ day of September, 2010) Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 15.09.1999, passed by the respondent No. 2 and the order dated'30.09.1999 whereby the State Government has decided t0 close down the Non-formal Education Programmes alongwith centers for the programme. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1 and 2 submit that the Non-Formal Education Programme has itself come to an end and as such, nothing survives in this petition and this petition has become infructuous as no relief, as sought for in this petition, can be granted at this stage. On perusal of the papers, it is found that the petitioner has not frled a copy of the order dated 15.091999 which is sought to be impugned herein. Thus, for want of material facts, this petition cannot be adjudicated. Subsequent challenge to the circular dated 30.09.1999 is not maintainable as the State Government has x. decided to close the Non-formal Education Programme. It is a @ policy decision of the State and this Court may not interfere with the policy decision, unless it is proved that the same is against the public policy or contrary to the provisions of the Constitution. The petitioners have also not produced any documents to establish that the order dated 30.09.1999 was passed either without any authority of law or is against the public policy. Even otherwise, no writ can be issued to create a scheme or to continue a scheme. For the reasons stated hereinabove, the writ petition is dismissed. Amit No order asto costs. \. , Sd/- a - Salish Salish K. Agnihou‘i: l Judge