THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1325 of 2010 ORDER: In this writ petition, it is the grievance of the petitioner that respondents 1 and 2 have not acted on the complaint lodged by her against respondents 3 to 9 on 16.01.2010. On instructions, it is submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents 1 and 2 that there are civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents; that One B.Kusuma Prakash Rao, who is the father of the petitioner, was the owner of the building, which is being run as lodging in the name of Kalaprakash Lodge, Karimnagar; that petitioner and five other children were born to his second wife and unofficial respondents were born to his first wife; that the petitioner’s brother filed O.S.No.508 of 2009 before the learned Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad and that the said Prakash Rao obtained injunction in I.A.No.530 of 2009 in O.S.No.112 of 2009 against the petitioner and five others. It is further submitted that aggrieved by the said injunction order, the petitioner filed C.M.A. before the learned V Additional District Judge, Karimnagar, but the same was ended in dismissal. It is further submitted that the said Prakash Rao filed a complaint stating that the petitioner through telephone No.040-32580062 threatened him with dire consequences and demanded to vacate the lodge by calling to 9989684525 and based on the said complaint, a case in Crime No.13 of 2010 was registered for the offence under Section 506 IPC against the petitioner and Sri B.Vincent, at Karimnagar I Town Police Station and it is under investigation. It is further submitted that to avoid arrest in the said crime, the petitioner filed this writ petition. It is also stated that the petitioner at no point of time filed a complaint before the Station House Officer, Karimnagar I Town Police Station. There is no material placed by the petitioner before this Court to show that she lodged a complaint before the Police Station concerned on 16.01.2010. Therefore, it cannot be said that the official respondents have not taken any action on the complaint lodged by her. Even a perusal of the complaint copy filed by the petitioner does not indicate that such copy is submitted to the first respondent. In the absence of any material before this Court to show that the petitioner lodged a complaint before the first respondent and in view of the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home that no complaint was lodged by the petitioner before the first respondent, I dismiss this writ petition giving liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate private complaint. No order as to costs. ______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 6th JULY, 2010. kvni