WP(C) 153/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI Heard Mr. S. Chamariya, learned counsel for the petitioner, and S. Chakraborty, learned Central Govt. Counsel, appearing for the respondents. Considering the fact that the pleadings, in the writ petition, makes out that th e cause of action for the relief(s), which the petitioner claims, has arisen wit hin the territorial limits of the State of Sikkim, this Court does not have the territorial jurisdiction to entertain this writ petition. In view of the above, it has been submitted, on behalf of the petitioner, that t he petitioner may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file appropriate writ application in the Court of competent jurisdiction. To the sub missions so made, no objection has been raised by the respondents. Considering, therefore, the matter in its entirety and in the interest of justic e, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty granted to the peti tioner as has been sought for by him. The interim direction, passed, in this case, on 11.01.2011, and continued therea fter, shall accordingly stand vacated.