IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.123 of 2007 MUNNA KUMAR PAUL @ MUNNA PAUL @MUNNA PD PAL Versus SHIV NANDAN PRASAD JAISHWAL ----------- 2. 26.03.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the trial court has passed orders for breaking open the lock of the shop alleged to be in possession of the defendant-petitioner, but since the court below has not ordered for police protection, he has not been able to get the lock opened. Without going into the merit of the case, this Court observes that if the tenant-petitioner has valid order of the court in his favour for breaking open the lock of the shop and to take possession of the same, the petitioner will be at liberty to produce the said order before the Superintendent of Police of the District for necessary police protection in compliance of the said order of the trial court. With the above observation, this civil revision application is disposed of. B.T. (J.N. Singh, J.)