1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.490 OF 2010 Prabhakar Gaadam & Ors. : Applicants V/s. State of Maharashtra & Anr. : Respondents .... Mr.Chetan Akerkar for the applicants. Ms Telgote i/b. S.J.Vaidya for respondent no.2. .... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : MARCH 25, 2010. P.C.: The applicants have filed this application for quashing Criminal Case No.107/PW/2010 pursuant to F.I.R. No.406/2009 pending before the learned Railway Mobile Court at Andheri, Mumbai. 2. The applicant no.1 and the respondent no.2 are husband and wife. It appears that there was some matrimonial dispute between the applicant no.1 and the respondent no.2. On account of the said dispute, the aforesaid F.I.R. came to be lodged. 3. However, now it appears that the matrimonial dispute has been resolved between the parties and that the applicant no.1 and the 2 respondent no.2 are residing together. An affidavit has been filed by the respondent no.1 reiterating this fact. Both the parties are present in Court and reiterate about the amicable settlement between them. 4. In view of the judgement of the apex Court in the case of B.S.Joshi v. State of Haryana (2003 (4) SCC 675), since the present proceedings arise out of matrimonial dispute between the parties and since the parties have now amicably resolved their dispute, I find that this is a fit case where under section 482 of the Cr.P.C., I should quash the criminal proceedings. 5. Rule is, therefore, made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). B. R. GAVAI, J.