IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 2015 of 2011 Date of decision: 19.7.2011 Parveen Sharma … Petitioner versus Rajiv Kundra and another … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Sidharth Gupta, Advocate, for the respondents. ... ARVIND KUMAR, J: The present petitioner is the defendant in the suit for possession by way of ejectment and recovery of arrears of rent. He is aggrieved with order dated 6.1.2011 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Panchkula, by dint of which the plaintiffs have been allowed to tender into evidence carbon-copy of the notice dated 21.7.2008 along with postal receipt, UPC and returned envelop. Heard. In this case, only the examination-in-chief of plaintiff No.1 has so far been recorded. The factum of sending notice dated 21.7.2008 has already been mentioned in the plaint but the same along with the allied documents i.e. postal receipts etc. due to inadvertence could not be annexed with the plaint. The said plaintiff is yet to be cross-examined by the defendant and as such, no prejudice is going to be caused to the defendant. Faced with this situation, counsel for the petitioner- defendant states that the costs of Rs.500/- imposed is too meager. Accordingly, the the same is enhanced from Rs.500/- to Rs.5000/-. Except with the said modification in the costs, the present revision petition stands dismissed. July 19, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) JS JUDGE