IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2009 / 18TH CHAITHRA 1931 Crl.MC.No. 1358 of 2009() ---------------------------- CC.761/2006 OF JUDL. MAGI. OF FIRST CLASS-I, THODUPUZHA .................... PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED: -------------------------------- SUNNY MATHEW, AGED 45, S/O MATHEW, PUTHIYEDATH HOUSE, THODUPUZHA KARA, THODUPUZHA VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.N.K.MOHANLAL RESPONDENT(S)/ACCUSED: --------------------------------- 1. BABY THOMAS @ THOMAS THOMAS, PUTHIYEDATH HOUSE, NEELOOR PO KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. GIKKU JACOB. THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N. KRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = CRL.M.C. NO. 1358 OF 2009 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 8th day of April, 2009. O R D E R This petition is filed with a prayer to quash Annexure- A2 judgment and direct the learned Magistrate to deliver the judgment after considering the result of comparison of handwritings made in the cheque. It is very unfortunate that litigations in these forms are galloping now-a-days giving way to the statutory provisions that has been provided. A case u/s 138 which has ended in conviction on 13th March, 2009 is now sought to be quashed by way of filing a Crl.M.C u/s 482 Cr.P.C. When a wrong judgment or a wrong conviction or sentence is passed by a Court of law the very same Criminal Procedure Code provides permission in the form of appeal and thereafter in the form of revision and it is the method that has to be followed by parties and not by resorting to shortcut methods u/s 482Cr.P.C. Even in Soorya Dev Rae's case the Apex Court has given guidelines where even interim order can be entertained in the proceedings in a Crl.M.C. 1358 OF 2009 -:2:- writ petition. I find absolutely no grounds to entertain this Crl.M.C. and therefore leaving open the right of the party to move the appropriate appellate forum for redressal of the grievance this petition is dismissed. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/-