IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14469 of 2010 1. DEO MUNA DEVI W/O SRI BHAGWAN SHARMA R/O MOUZA- DOGHARA, P.S.BEHIA, P.O.BEHIA, DISTT-BHOJPUR Versus 1. LALAN SHARMA S/O LATE NAGINA SHARMA R/O MOUZA- DOGHARA, P.S.BEHIA, P.O.BEHIA, DISTT-BHOJPUR 2. LAL CHAND SHARMA S/O LATE GAJADHAR SHARMA R/O MOUZA-DOGHARA, P.S.BEHIA, P.O.BEHIA, DISTT-BHOJPUR 3. SHEO SHANKAR SHARMA S/O LATE GAJADHAR SHARMA R/O MOUZA-DOGHARA, P.S.BEHIA, P.O.BEHIA, DISTT-BHOJPUR 4. SHEO NANDAN SHARMA S/O LATE GAJADHAR SHARMA R/O MOUZA-DOGHARA, P.S.BEHIA, P.O.BEHIA, DISTT-BHOJPUR 5. MAHESHWAR SHARMA S/O LATE DAROGA SHARMA R/O MOUZA-DOGHARA, P.S.BEHIA, P.O.BEHIA, DISTT-BHOJPUR 6. MOST. UGNA KUER W/O LATE RAM BACHAN SHARMA R/O MOUZA-DOGHARA, P.S.BEHIA, P.O.BEHIA, DISTT-BHOJPUR 7. THE STATE OF BIHAR 8. THE REGISTRAR, CIVIL COURT ARA, BHOJPUR ----------- 03. 29.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner has preferred this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India questioning the order dated 20.3.2010 passed by the Sub-ordinate Judge-VI, Bhojpur at Arrah in Title Suit No. 326 of 2001. The petitioner is stated to be the plaintiff in the suit. By the impugned order, a sale deed dated 7.3.1969 executed by the father of defendant no. 2-4 has been permitted to be brought on record and has been marked as exhibit upon payment of Rs. 100/- as costs. Assailing the order, learned counsel submits that the attempt to bring the document so belatedly was only to delay the suit. 2 From the impugned order it appears that the case was fixed for arguments and evidence was closed on 10.4.2007. The application for recall of witnesses was subsequently allowed and case was fixed for arguments again on 20.5.2009. The document in question has been marked as exhibit and the case has been fixed for argument. The evidentiary value of the exhibit is a matter to be decided in the suit itself. The submission of apprehended delay stands belied by the order itself which proceeds to fix the suit for hearing after marking the document as exhibit. The writ application is dismissed. P.K. ( Navin Sinha, J.)