1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 6964 of 2010 Decided on: 26th November, 2010. Sanjeev Kumar ….. Petitioner. Versus HPSEDC …… Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition has been filed with the following prayers: “(I) That a writ of mandamus may be issued thereby directing the respondent corporation to consider the case of petitioner for promotion to the post of Junior Engineer. (ii) That the respondent corporation may be directed to decide the representation in Annexure P-6 and P-7, as made by petitioner.” 2. There will be a direction to the respondent to take appropriate action on Annexures P-6 & P-7, representations, in accordance with law, with notice to the petitioner and any other affected parties, within three months from the date of production of copy of this judgment alongwith the copy of the writ petition by the petitioner. 2 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. November 26th, 2010. (Justice V.K. Sharma), (hl/kck) Judge.