1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Criminal Application No.2618 Of 2011 In Criminal Revision Application No.136 Of 2011 Yusuf Saibu Tadvi. .. Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondent. -------- Shri. Mukul Kulkarni, Advocate, for the applicant. Shri. D.R. Korde, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent. -------- CORAM: K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 24th JUNE 2011 PER COURT : 1) Head Shri. Kulkarni, learned counsel for the aplicant. 2) In Regular Criminal Case No.216 of 2011 the accused / revision petitioner was convicted for an offence under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for six months with fine 2 by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Bhusawal. In Appeal No.88 of 2004 the aforesaid recorded order of conviction was confirmed on 9-6-2011. The accused / applicant is in custody. 3) Shri Kulkarni informs that, there are no other cases pending against the accused. He was all throughout on bail during course of trial and he would not misuse liberty if released on bail. 4) In the set of above facts since the accused is only bread earner of the family and the fine amount is deposited, the accused be released on same bail with fresh PR bonds to be executed before the learned Sessions Judge. The sentence is suspended. The application is allowed. Sd/- (K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.) rsl