THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S.APPA RAO M.A.C.M.A No.64 of 2008 Being aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 09.01.2007 passed in O.P.No.3 of 2005 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-V Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Anantapur, the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed. 2 . The appellant herein is the petitioner in the O.P.No.3 of 2005. The petition was filed claiming a compensation of Rs.90,000/- for the injuries sustained by him in a road traffic accident that occurred on 27.03.2001. After adducing the evidence of P.W.1 and Exs.A-1 to A-3, the Tribunal below awarded compensation of Rs.36,500/- under all heads. Aggrieved by the same, the present civil miscellaneous appeal is filed. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant urged that the compensation awarded by the lower Court is very meagre and sought for enhancement of compensation. 4. Now, the point for consideration is: Whether the Order of the lower Court is sustainable? P O I N T: 5. The injured-appellant himself got examined as P.W.1 and got marked Exs.A-1 to A-3, which happened to be the Certified Copies of First Information Report, Insurance Certificate and Wound Certificate respectively. The respondent-insurance company urged that as per Ex.B-1-insurance policy, the offending vehicle has valid insurance coverage on the date of accident. 6. The injured-appellant sustained multiple injuries and filed Ex.A-3-wound certificate. As per Ex.A-3, he sustained two injuries, one simple and one grievous. While taking into consideration the gravity of injuries, an amount of Rs.15,000/- was awarded for one grievous injury and Rs.1,500/- for one simple injury. The injured- appellant has not examined the doctor who issued Ex.A-3. However, the lower Court granted Rs.15,000/- for grievous injury and Rs.1,500/- for simple injury and further Rs.10,000/- towards pain and suffering and Rs.10,000/- towards medical and other expenses, though no medical bills are filed. In any view of the matter, the award of compensation granted by the lower Court is very much excessive but not meagre. 7. Therefore, I see no grounds to interfere with the decision of the lower Court. Accordingly, the order of the Tribunal is sustainable. 8. In the result, the Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ K.S.APPA RAO, J March 30th, 2011 SP THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S.APPA RAO M.A.C.M.A No.64 of 2008 March 30th, 2011 SP