1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 69 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3526 OF 2009 (Public Education Society and another .v. Mirza Akhatar Baig Mirza Musavvir Baig and another) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri S. Raisuddin, Advocate for the appellants. Shri Mirza Akhtar Baig, Advocate for respondent No.1. Shri S.B. Ahirkar, AGP for respondent No.2. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. 30TH JULY, 2010. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. This LPA is directed against the interim order dated 19.11.2008 passed in Writ Petition No. 3526 of 2009. The interim order passed at the time of admission of the writ petition, reads thus :- “Heard parties on prayer for grant of interim relief. The order dt. 14/8/07 though presumed to be issued during probation of petitioner is per se punitive and stigmatic, admittedly no departmental enquiry has been conducted. In the circumstances the respondent Nos.1 and 2 are directed to reinstate the petitioner back in service during the pendency of the present petition and to continue to pay his salary in accordance with law.” When we asked learned Counsel for the appellants whether respondent No.1 has been reinstated in pursuance of this order, he submitted that the respondent No.1 never turned up and got employment in some other institution and he has been working there till this date. In view thereof, we also asked the learned Counsel for respondent No.1 whether the statement made by the learned Counsel for the appellants is correct. He submitted 2 that it is true that respondent No.1 is working in some other institution, but he further submitted that after the order dated 19.11.2008 was passed, he made an attempt to join the services but he was not allowed. The respondent No.1 has not made any application or filed contempt petition making grievance that he was not allowed to resume in view of the order dated 19.11.2008. In the circumstances, we do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. Hence, the appeal is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE *rrg.