IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 19007 of 1998 Between: B.Rajeshwar Reddy S/o. B.Sathyapal Reddy R/o. Sri Sai Ram Apartments, Saidaba, Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1.. The Area Manager, Hyderabad Telecom District, Room No. 415, Suryalok Complex, Gunfoundry, Hyderabad 2.. The Divisional Engineer (Extl), Saroornagar, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or writs, order or direction declaring the action of the respondents in not providing telephone connection to the petitioner’s residence situated at Flat No. 101, Sri Sai Ram Apartments, Saidabad, Hyderabad, inspite of the representation dt.24-6-1998 made by the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of the representation dt 24-6-1998 and pass For the Petitioner : Mr.T.Venkata Reddy, Advocate For the Respondent: Mr. S.S.Varma, Standing Counsel for Telecom The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become in-fructuous. Recording the submission of the learned counsel for petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as in-fructuous. No costs. ____________ N.V.RAMANA,J 24-2-2005 TVK ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.. The Area Manager, Hyderabad Telecom District, Room No. 415, Suryalok Complex, Gunfoundry, Hyderabad 2.. The Divisional Engineer (Extl), Saroornagar, Hyderabad 3) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{ }