IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.: 4515 of 2010. Decided on: 13.08.2010. __________________________________________________________ Prem Singh. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. For the petitioner : Mr. Vijender Katoch, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C. J. (Oral): The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:- “I. That the respondents be directed to grant notional work charge/regularization to the petitioner with all service benefits including Seniority, arrears in back wages, pay fixation w.e.f. 31st May, 2003. II. That the respondents be directed to produce the entire record pertaining to the case of the petitioner before this Honourable Court for perusal of this Honourable court so that a just conclusion may be arrived at by the Honourable court.” 2. According to the petitioner, his case is covered by the decision of this Court in Rakesh Kumar versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, CWP No.2735 of 2010, dated 28th July, 2010. Whether the decision of the case would apply to the Revenue - 2 - Establishment, is to be examined, since the implementation of the said judgment would depend on the fact whether the Revenue Establishment is work-charge Establishment. The petitioner has also raised a contention regarding retrospective regularization. According to the petitioner, juniors to him have been given regularization prior to him. If that is so, the matter requires examination. The petitioner may point out all his grievances before the first respondent by way of appropriate representation, in which case, the matter will be duly examined by the first respondent adverting to the submissions taken by the petitioner and appropriate action in accordance with law and justice shall be taken in the matter, within four months from the date of receipt of representation alongwith copy of this judgment and the copy of judgment referred to above. 3. With the above observations, the petitions are disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. August 13, 2010. (sck).