:1: IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1149 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.587 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income tax-VI. ..Appellant. Vs. M/s. E-Merck (India) Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr.S.G.Dalal for the Respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED : 22ND JANUARY,2008. PC : 1. This is a notice of motion for condonation of 484 days delay in preferring the main appeal. On perusal of the affidavit in support of the motion, we find that the file was sent to the Ministry of Law for drafting the appeal on 16.2.2005 and the draft appeal was received on 13.2.2006. The period of almost one year merely for drafting the appeal memo cannot be said to be reasonable. In the circumstances, cause shown is not sufficient cause and therefore, appeal is dismissed. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.) :2: IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.587 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income tax-VI. ..Appellant. Vs. M/s. E-Merck (India) Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr.S.G.Dalal for the Respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED : 22ND JANUARY,2008. PC : 1. As the motion for condonation of delay is dismissed, appeal is dismissed. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)