CHHATTISGARH WP No. 33X2000 PETITIQNER Narayan Singh VERSUS The State of Chhattisgarh And Another ? COUNTER AFFIDAVIT ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENTS J;#MDr E V auntg .,,,.1PM? ’ ? RESPONDENTS . ~‘n 'L ® §"€§%H CQURT 91F GE§5%??§$G&RH £32? SELASF£§R N EE§¥ES£Q§€ &§M£H Ci§é§£Mz HQNsgLE $HR§ RAJEEV GUPTA, CyJ. H§§é”%§.E $§€R§ ${JWEI KUM‘QR giNfm, $. N W?i€r F§€§tée§z N9. 33JEQ§§ E?§T§ON Narayan Singh yersus And This 1x12¥it petitfon came it: be registered on the campmint 9f one Nafayan Singh aiieging cgmmissien 13f murder. 9f Ms arm —— Skamwh Kumar on 2&042000 ciaf§ng the geriad ef h§$ daemon a5 Linda Mai prisoner in jgié by $ so—prisene‘r, rmmety, Rakegh S§ngh. 2) On immimortem examinatim, no external 3r éntema! mjuyiess were fwnd on the betjy Qf the deseased - Santosh Kumar‘ As the auiopsy surgecn cauid mf amerkain ihe Gauge cf death, his Visaera M13 preservaé and $eni far chemicai examinaiéea for the s'3 {lstemiqn 0f any chamicag paison The Chemica§ examination {apart PER @ESPQNmENw State of Another if. Chhatéisgarh LeEter 9e€§tmn Rresem : Peiiiioner’s counse; ab5eni. Shri MPS Bhatia‘ Dy GA for the state. éR§E§¥ (29m February, 2068) The feifswmg wder 0f the Ccurt was passed indicateg that m chemicaf poéson was detected En t. e Visaem af ‘khe deceased. Thus, there wa5 m mater§a3 to §nd§caie that deceased — Saniash Kumar amid an unnaturai death, in ihe m&g§$ieria! enquiry aJSG m evideme wag founci against any ca—pris’aner t9 establiSh that deceased; Sgntosh Kumar died. an assaum of any act 0f violemce. 3 m View of the abcve mentioned bmad feagtu'res a? the ceee, we are satisfied that no furiher monitering ef the matter in this writ petitien, new; is tequired. 4) The Wiit petition, thus, stande disposed cf. SW= gwmit Katmai“ Feimiza ék §ui§ge tip/k Chief Justice u—v