WPMS 1268/2011 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Sri Vipul Painuli, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri P.C. Bisht, the learned Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 3 and Sri B.C. Joshi, Advocate holding the brief of Sri Vipul Sharma, the learned counsel for respondent no. 2. The petitioner is patently responsible for not registering the appeal as per the direction of the Chief Information Commissioner. This information was given to the petitioner on 2nd November, 2010 and the petitioner was transferred on 29th November, 2010. There was sufficient time for the petitioner to obey the direction of the Chief Information Commissioner. This Court does not find any error in the impugned order. The writ petition is dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) 24-06-2011 SP