IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 14473 of 2005 Between: S. Khadar Basha S/o S. Mahbooob Basha SI (O) Under Suspension BSNL Telephone Exchange Kollur, R/o Pakala, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER AND The Sub-Divisional Engineer (Groups) Bharath Sanchar Nigam Ltd., Pakala, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the issuance of Letter No. SDE (G)/PACK/SISC- Case/Khadar basha/2/04-05 dated at Pak the 2-03-3005 from the file of the respondent, peruse the same and quash the said order holding it as arbitrary, illegal discriminatory and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the petition into service with all attendant monetary benefits. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.C.M.R.VELU Counsel for the Respondent: SC FOR B.S.N.L The Court at the admission stage made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioner aggrieved by the order of suspension dated 02.03.2005 passed by the respondent. According to the petitioner, as there is a criminal case against him, he was originally suspended and thereafter, on his representation, he was reinstated and was allowed to continue in service, pending criminal case. As the criminal case ended in conviction imposing punishment of two years imprisonment together with fine, the respondent passed an order on 02.03.2005 suspending him from service. However, as the conviction was suspended by the appellate Court by an order dated 31.01.2005 and the said fact was not brought to the notice of the respondent, he made a representation on 20.06.2005 bringing the same to the notice of the respondent. However, his grievance is that the respondent did not dispose of his representation though it was made on 20.06.2005. Hence, he has come up with the present writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent. As the representation of the petitioner is pending with the respondent, the respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the same expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. _________________ 06.07.2005 Note: Issue CC in three days. (b/o) VGB To 1. The Sub-Divisional Engineer (Groups) Bharath Sanchar Nigam Ltd., Pakala, Chittoor District. 2. 2CD copies. 3. 1CC to Mr.Velu.