IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO.2225 OF 2002 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2079 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.242 OF 2002 Smt.Jayashree Shantaram Manjarekar ...Applicant Versus Shri.Pandarinath Rajaram Yeram & Anr...Respondents ...... Mr.M.Unnikrishnan for Applicant. Mr.V.Z.Kankaria for Respondent No.1. Mr.K.V.Saste, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. APRIL 6, 2005. APRIL 6, 2005. APRIL 6, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. Perused the pleadings. : 2 : 2. Delay in filing Revision Application is only of seven days. Indeed, Respondents have raised several issues including maintainability of the Revision Application at the instance of the present Applicant. However, those aspects can be considered while examining the Revision Application for admission. For the present, suffice it to observe that as delay is only of seven days and explanation is offered, the same deserves to be condoned. 3. This Application is therefore allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). As a consequence of condoning the delay, the Application for substitution being Criminal Application No.2079 of 2005 is also granted. 4. It is once against made clear that all other issues regarding maintainability of the Revision Application or locus of the Applicant to maintain such Revision Application, will be considered at the admission stage. : 3 : 5. Both the Applications disposed of accordingly. 6. Office is directed to register the Revision Application, if already not done and place the same for admission on 12th April 2005. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.