IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.11770 of 2010 Date of Decision : July 07, 2010. Rajni Jain .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.S.S.Salar, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks a mandamus to direct the Ludhiana Improvement Trust, Ludhiana to allot her alternative plot in lieu of plot No.101-D, Model Town Extension Part-II, Ludhiana. It is averred that after a long drawn correspondence, the Trust vide its resolution No.145 dated 15.6.2006 (Annexure P-2) sent the case of the petitioner for Government approval regarding allotment of an alternative plot and the said proposal has been finally approved by the State Government on 31.8.2006 (Annexure P-5). Despite, the alternative plot has not been allotted to the petitioner, though she has represented several times including vide representations dated 24.6.2008, 23.12.2009 & 23.3.2010 (Annexures P-7, P-8 & P-9 respectively). C.W.P.No .11770 of 2010 2 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the same with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the above-mentioned claim of the petitioner and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. July 07, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE