ggsPoNDEms m THE HI$ COURT OF JUDI&TURE AT BEASPIR(&HETTEGARH) ‘ 1. DeeFak Nautiyalfi 3/0? Shri H‘ P. Nautiyalff Aged 43 years;‘% 0¢cupation service". Presently posted as Manager(Advance) , Surguja Kshetriya Gramin Bank? Head Office, m§§a ur, Dist.” Surgnja ($6.? Anup Kumar M ‘shra, S/a: Shri R. ; Mishra; Aged 43 YearS0 Occupation service, PreSently pasted as Branch Managerii Surguja'Kshetriya Gramin Ban 721, Branch O£fice Rajpur‘1'93 Disti‘ Surguja (COGD) 3i Ajay Kumar Guptai‘ii S/ei: ShrimP. Gupta)? Aged 41 yearsii; Occupaticn service’;% Presently posted as Auditar.’ Surguja Kshetriya Gramin Bank, He§d Officeg'Ambika ury Diétfiaarguja (QG. Dhirexmra Nath Dubey;% S/o‘i‘ Shri Tm‘i‘ Dubeyif Aged 43 yearsi: Occupaticn service? Presently posted as Branch- Manager%i > Snrguja ’Kshetriya Gramin Bank?i’1 Branch Office Darimay Dist: Surguja (C.G.) Vs; Surguja Kshetriya Gramin Banki A’Regional Rural Bank cormtitut— ‘ mm PEMTION m.‘ZL/ 22 (20m, ed under Regional Rural Bank Act'i; 1976; Throum its Charman; Heac Office; Kmar Cemplex$ ‘ mikapmm; Dise; Surguja (c.G.) Mahamaya Chowki’, contd".‘.72.’ e PETIT IONERS x i Vb AEEQH $§E§E§‘ @F $3§ATTE$$§E§§ £3? Eii§§§§§$§ W’RET PETITION N024i} /2001 DEEPAK NAUTIYAL 85 4 OTHERS -V51_ gVf‘‘ A A SURGUJA KSHETRIYA GRAMIN BANf< & TWO OTHERS 1 Sari Mamndra Shrivagtava; Counsel fcr the yetitioners; Shri P.$!Koghy, Coun$e1 for the re£psnéents. Kum. Sharmila Singhai, Ceunsei for intenlenerg- V Sukhram Sahu 8% Om Pasta 1 ORDER f 17/1 1g2003 £53- ?g§ §éK&E‘i§E@E§, J. -«~r—~. ’2. ’Fhi$ «gietitign under Artic1e 226 Ufthe Congtimtian i Gf hldia is (iirected again$t a letter dated 6. 1 1,;2001’ by ‘ which fé$p0i15§€nt No.1 has included 8 pes‘ig cf Officer Scaie H in the prccesS Gf geiection through interview withcut holding written examinations. It is $ubmitt-e ihai thege eight pogtg were creataLi afm‘r conling into fares of Regional Rural Bank$ (Pgpyointment ané \_lgmmgiian c‘fOfficeTs ajid othei‘ emakvew ; .y RuIES, 19:9 . OC x It is further gubmitted that the$e rules cane iato force on 29.07,.‘1998: 3. it i3 pmhted out by the counSei f0? respandents and interveners that salec’tiom yrece$S 1116.3 takén plame and the yessuitg thereaf have 110i been dgclared. ‘+ It i$ submitted by the counsel for the petitionerg that the petitioners were alsa called for interview. \ TWhe1;her the petitionerg appeared in the interview or 110:' 3S nOt disckmed. 5. interviews were to be held 0n 20‘} 1.20G1 Whereas: thi$ petition wag filed on 19.11.2061, which calne up fer hearing on 21. 1 1.2001. 6. Let the reeulte be declared. 7. Counsel fer the respondente Submitted that the reepondents‘ may be ailowed ta get the reSuite ‘. yubliehed. 8. .X‘Ceunsel for the petiticners submitted that the petiticmers’ intereet may be pretected to the extent that they may be allowed to make a representation, if they are not eeKected, which $11211 be coneidered after hearing them. 9. Having heard learneci couneel for the partiee arld *\c011$ic‘iering the facts alad. circurnstances of the caee \ \ ‘L \‘ anti without expres$ing any opimon on the merits of the case, in the Opinic'n of this Caurt, ends 0f justice Wm be sewed if the peiitionere are permitted t0 make their repreeentation, in case their grievancee euiaeiet, ‘io the competent Au€hority 16: on such representation‘ being filed, the Sarge Shall be decidegfipafter due / consideration on ite 0WD. merits in accordance with law as early as poeeihle. So far ae 4 poses cut of 8 paste are concerned, they may not be fiileci. Respondents; may preceed t0 fiB up the ether 4 poets. 10. This order has arrivecl at on the broad consensus of the partiee.