ians^ ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. W.P. (S) No.....:.UJ.^.....2011 PETITIONER. :..--"';i'y\J''" ^.•s:"t"' ^^y^^^} ^<' AaW0-" .^c:s.^:/> •f^ ll'.'''.' /" ~\'-*»' '••-^. p?? '^. \ v'f. \ '-^\ [BL^^ S^i \ \ <i%j'3j,y^ ^ j o^ RESPONDENTS (1) (2) (3)' (41 Sharad Kum.ar Parghaniya, Aged 56 Years, S/o Shri Moradlal, Lecturer, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Bemetara, Tah. 85 Distt. Durg C.G. VERSUS The State Govt. of Chhattishgarh, Through - The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan,'Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) Block Education Officer Patan, Distt. Durg C.G. Principal, Girls Govt. Higher Secondary School, Bemetara District Durg C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OR MANDAMUS/DIRECTION OFOTHER APPROPRIATEWRIT. HIGH CODRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIL^PUR yS.iSMQiwieM^lt versus Sharad Kumar PEiT^h&niya State of C.G. & Ofhers ^ _^ Shii Sonikaiit Verma., coiiD.scl for tlae petitioner. Shri Praveeu Das, Dv. G.A. for fh.e State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTXCLE 226 0V THB CONSTITUTION With the conse.nt ofthe psrties, fb.e aiatter is heard fiaaUy. The petitioiier was iniuaUy appoi&ted as Assi.staiit Teaclier on a fixed pay of Rs. 100, After coinpletion of his protoatioa period, he was iraiited regular pay scale ofRs. 169-300. Leanaed coiuisel for the •Detitioner subniits tha.t the above issue Iias been considered bv fhe M.P. State AdiiLmistrative Tri'bnnal. Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 between Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. arid otliers, wbeTein it was held fhat tbe siiD.ilarly situated teachers are entitled to regi.Uar pay scale with effect froiB. tbe date of m.itial a.ppointia.ent. The m.a.tter was taken •ap to the Hon'ble Suprenie Court. The appeal was disinissed by tlie Honrble S'upreiae Court upholding the decision of the Tribtinal to fhe effect tliat tlie Teaclieis/AssistaatTea.chers are entifled to regular pay scale from the date of inltial appointraent. It is fiirfb.er sub-niitted fhat this Court wllile coasidering the ssjne issue ja W.P. (S) No. 4725/3006 •bettiseen Ama.T Scd Rccnt & Others Vs. State of Chtvi.Uisgarh ajid. Others by order dated 01.09.66 allowed tlie petitioners to miake a. i^presentatio.n witb.ici a period oftea days, raisiag aU fhe grievaaces. Accordiagly the petitioa.er is graated liberty to laake a l-epFesentation raising ail his gricvances in thc light of fh,e aforessM judgnient aiid the circiilar dated 05.01.2011 (Annexure P/5), and i& ''^ %°S5S\ 2 '^::i^^&^ ^ 'y ^ 'i^--^-<^'; ^ tura 'Qie concemed respondent is dirccted to decide tae rep.resen.ta.tion, if aiiy, in accordaiice wifb. .law, on its own. ic.erits, withim. a period of eigat wceks from. the date of receipt of ftie representatioii subject to verification of tlie facts. In view of the foregoiiig, fhis petition is disposed of. No orrler as to costs.