1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.633 OF 2009 Mr.Suresh Shankarlalji : Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & Anr. : Respondents ... Mr.Rajendra J. Rathod with Mr.S.D.Kadam for the petitioner. Mr.S.S.Pednekar, Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Mr.A.Y.Sakhare, Senior Advocate, i/b. Y.K.S. Legal for respondent no.2. ... CORAM : S.A. BOBDE, J. DATE : JULY 29, 2009. P.C.: Rule, returnable forthwith. The learned counsel for the respective respondents waive service. Heard by consent. 2. It appears from the impugned order, process has been issued mechanically without due application of mind on the basis of a verification statement which is in a format already prepared. An order similar to the impugned order was set aside in similar circumstances by this Court in Amarnath Baijnath Gupta v. M/s.Mohini Organics Pvt. Ltd. 2 (2009 All MR (Cri.) 184). 3. In this view of the matter, the impugned order is set aside. The other accused have not approached this Court, but they will also naturally be entitled to the benefits of this order. The Magistrate shall proceed, in accordance with law. Order accordingly. Rule is made absolute. S.A. BOBDE, J.