IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19784 of 2010 GIRINENDRA KUMAR @ GIRINENDRA KUMAR JHA @ LUTTU Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 23.06.2010 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Mithanpura P.S. Case No.78 of 2009 for offences punishable under Sections 489-A, 489-B, 489-C, 420 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel with reference to the statement of allegation as set out in the F.I.R. submits that the alleged recovery is said to be of three notes of Rs.1000/- denomination, five notes of Rs.500/- denominations and five notes of Rs. 50/- denominations and which according to the informant, appeared to be counterfeit. Learned counsel submits that the statements are incorrect and the petitioner has been taken into custody merely on the basis of suspicion. He submits that apart from the present case he is also involved in other case bearing Mushari P.S. Case No. 16 of 2008 for the offence punishable under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and in which he is on bail. Learned counsel submits that despite the fact that the petitioner was taken 2 into custody on 23.5.2009 no report has been submitted in respect of alleged seizure. Having regard to the submissions aforesaid, let the petitioner, namely, Girinendra Kumar @ Girinendra Kumar Jha @ Lattu be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Mithanpura P.S. Case No. 78 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (1) One of the close relatives of the petitioner would stand as one of the bailors and would ensure his attendance before the Court below (2) The petitioner shall be attending the trial of the case on each and every date fixed without any break and the failure on the part of the petitioner to attend the Court below on two consecutive dates fixed in the case without any reasonable explanation to the satisfaction of the trial Court, would entitle the Court concerned to initiate proceedings for cancellation of his bail bond and for taking him into custody. Bibhash ( Jyoti Saran, J.)