1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11758/2009 Subhash Bishnoi. vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date : 24.2.2010 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.Pramendra Bohra, for the petitioner. Mr.KK Bissa, for the respondents. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner was contractual appointee and as per the contract executed by him, his term is going to expire on 28.2.2010. The petitioner's contention is that he could not have been removed by invoking power under condition no.6 of the contract and he has been removed from service by order dated 5.12.2009 in violation of Rule 16. The respondents submitted a reply to the writ petition and stated that the matter has been enquired into and thereafter, the petitioner was removed. It is also clear from the agreement that Annex.P/2 that no specific procedure has been 2 prescribed for the enquiry but in the present case, opportunity was provided to the petitioner and thereafter, this order was passed. Furthermore, even if this order is set aside, then also the petitioner can continue in service upto 28.2.2010. Therefore also, in such a matter, this Court is not inclined to exercise the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India looking to the facts of the case. Consequently, this writ petition is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya