IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4957 of 2011 MD. JAWED Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 25.03.2011 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in Ara Nawada P.S. Case No. 210 of 2002 under Sections 25(1- B)(a),26 & 35 of the Arms Act. It is alleged that the recovery of the arms has been made from Gajendra Singh and Dharmendra Singh, who disclosed the name of the petitioner as one of the suppliers. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the parentage and the address of the petitioner was not correct in the F.I.R. and for the first time the police has filed requisition for issuance of warrant in the Court in the year 2010. It is submitted by learned counsel that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Let learned Court-below i.e. Sri B.K. Singh, J.M. 1st Class, Arrah, consider the regular bail application of the petitioner, keeping in mind that the recovery has not been made from the petitioner and his name surfaced on the confession of the co-accused. Moreover, parentage and address of the petitioner are not correct in the F.I.R., provided that on verification it is found that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Let the order be transmitted through fax at the cost of the petitioner. Mkr. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)