HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petitian N0. 1677 of2092 PETITIONER Govcrdhan [a1 Nishad, S/o Shri Khorbahara Ram Nishad, R/o La:&nkhurd, Post Bamhani, District Mahasamund (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS i l. Deputy Dlrector (Hotncalture) Ralpur Dmsmn, C1v1l Lmes Ralpur (CG) 2 Pre§1&mg Officer Labour Court, Rmpur (CG). (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF NDIA) (SB: Hon‘ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) ‘ Present : Shri Pradeep Saxena, Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed! an 4‘“ day at" July, 2098) x‘x w The petitioner, by this petition, challenges the validity of the order dated 06.12.01 (Annexure P/l ), passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Raipur, to the extent of grant of25 percent back-wages. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to 100 percent back-wages as the petitioner was restrained from working. On perusal Of the pleadings and documents appended thereto, it appears that the petitioner was reinstated on the findings that the retrenchment was not legal. Grant of full back-wages was not pleaded before the Labour Court. Thus, at this stage, consideration of the facts ofthe case, in regard to grant of back-wages, when there is no foundation laid down by the petitioner before the Tribunal below, is not proper and justified. Grant of 25 percent back-wages with reinstatement is just and proper and no interference with impugned order is warranted. Thus, petition is accordingly dismissed. No order asto costs \ Sdl— anshg Agmhom’x ‘ . . udge \