E—JS 3)!^T ^Tftt-tI* wr SSKS <»*iw 3^^ ^(Tm^r, ^flRpis, Rcsi^y 10 ^ C^-) ^^9^^07- SH^T xra% c^fgq^T) 'g^tTsg? ^ifgtT sn^ PETITIONER Na ags Ra ag^d *wfi'f<i)'i wraf ^_fe^ <I««sii ^3tfg?T3II^?T IfinPoddar, son of Shri Pawan Poddar, about 33 years, resident of AC203, j?indra Faili, Kestopur, Koikata 101 (West Bejiaal). RESPON_DENTS 1. Sta -Versus- te of Chhattisgarh, through the Seoretary, Mir^istry of Home, Seoretariat, D.K.S. Bhawan, Rafcur. 2. Th^ Director General of Police, Raipur. 3. Th^ Station House Officer, Police Station Kh^mtarai, Raipur. 4. Viisl)? Poddar. son of Shri Shvam Sunder Pocjdar, Director, Ws Bulwald industries, 634 Uri^ indusiria! Area, Birgaon, Raipur. (Writ Petition under Arti|;Ie 226 ofthe Constitulion of India) Division Bench : Hon'ble Shri L.C. Bhadoo & i-loii'bSeShriSun!! Kyniar Sinha, aU 3-9-2007 Heard Shri B.P. Sharma, co Advocate General forthe State/resolindente No.1 lo 3. Learned counsel for the oetit Neerai Poddar has been traced out inse! for ihe petitioner & Shri Vinay Harit, Dy. oner submits that the missing person namely, |iythe Police aulhorities from Mumbai and he has been handed overlo his family rjiembers. In view of the above statem^nt, In our opinion, nothing survives in this wril petition. Accordinalv, the Detition stail ds disposed of. Consequentiy, application (I.^.No.1) for taking appropriate action against respondent No.4 stands disposed of.| Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge