^r^ ^a^1' w /^' INrHEH!GHCOURr:OFCH^^ Writ Retition IMp. 1369 o±2003 Petitioners 1. 2. Bhau Ram Sahu, S/o Dmu Ram Sahu, age 75 years, Tulailam, S/ o Bhau Raiii Sahu, Age 45 years. Both R/o vm. Paudarbatta, Talisil MungeM, Dist. Bilaspiir (CG) Versus Respondents 1, Leladhar alias Slriv Prasad, S/o Bhau Rani Sahu, aged 46 years, R/o Vill Parsada, Tahsil & Dist. Nawagarh. 2. Rainkiiinar, S/o Bhau Ram Sahu, aged 40 yeai-s. Laxman Sah.u, S/o Bhau Ram Sahu, aged 38 years. Both R/o vm. Paadarbatta, Tahsil Mungeli, Dist. Bilaspur (CG) Mohit Ram, S/o Bhauram Sahu, aged 36 ;/ears, R/o Hathinipara, Bhatapara, Tahsil Baloda Ba^ai, Dist. Ralpur. Pillau Ram, S/o Milau Kaoi Sataami, aged 75 years. Sukhuram, S/o Pillau Raai Satnami, aged 50 years, Both R/o VU1. Jaaji, Tahsu Seepat, Dist. BUaspur. State of C.G. Through CoUector, Dist: Durg (CG). 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. (Writ Petition under Ailicle 226/ 227 of the Constitution of India) (SB: Hon?ble Shri Satish K. Aguihotri J.) Shri Vimalesh Bajpai, Advocate for the petitioners, Shii Ashish Suraiia, Advocate tbr ttie respondent No. 1. Shii Ashish Sluivastava, Advocate ibr the Muxucipal Corporation, Raipur, Shii P. P. Sahu, Advocate for the respondents No. 5 aad 6. Shii Arviad Dubey, Paiiel Lawyer Ibr fhe respondent No.7, 1. ORDi&R ( Passed on this 30* Day 6fJaauar^r, 2009) Learned coiuisel appearing fbr the petitiouers, on nistructions, subinits fhat the petiteloners seek perinission of this Court to witiidraw this petition, ^- ^ 2. 3. 'rhakur Learaed counsel appearing fbr the respondents have no objection. In view of the fbregoiag, this petition is disinissed as withdrawn. ConsequenUy, M(W)P No. 1247/2003 is also disinissed, Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judgs