IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.20694 of 2010 BEBI DEVI, W/O GYANCHANDRA JHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SIRUA, P.S. BAHERI, DISTT. DARBHANGA. ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DY. INSPECTOR GENERAL, ADMINISTRATION, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. DY. INSPECTOR GENERAL, BHAGALPUR RANGE, BHAGALPUR. 4. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BHAGALPUR. ... ... RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 4.1.2011. Heard Shri Bishwanath Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Rajgarihiar, learned A.C. to A.A.G.4. The petitioner’s husband was to retire with effect from 31.12.2000 as Constable from Bhagalpur District Police. However, before retirement, he remained absent for a long period on the ground of illness. Subsequently, as per order of Lokayukt, an enquiry was conducted by the Superintendent of Police. During enquiry, the petitioner was found entitled for pensionary benefit after adjustment of absence period. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that despite decision taken by the Superintendent of Police, Bhagalpur vide Annexure-1, till date nothing has been paid to the husband of the petitioner. With the consent of the parties, the 2 N.H./ writ petition is being disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Superintendent of Police, Bhagalpur within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, the respondent no.4 i.e. Superintendent of Police, Bhagalpur is directed to examine the same and redress all the grievances of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. In case of refusal, the respondent no.4 is directed to pass a speaking order within aforesaid time. With above observation and direction, the petition stands disposed of. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)