\ao\ IN THE HIGH COURT OP“ CHHA’I‘TISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 711 of 2002 (Wm‘t Petition under Axticles 226/ 227 of the Constitution of India) (SB: Hon’ble Shn' Satish K. Agm‘hotn‘ J.) Shri Yogesh Pandey, Advocate on the authority of Shri R. S. Jaiswal, Senior Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Axvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the respondents. O R D E R ( Passed on this 9th Day ofJanuaIy, 2009 ) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition on the ground that this petition has become infructuous. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents] State has no objection. 3. In View of the foregoing, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, as having become inir'uctuous. Consequently, M(W)P No. 144/ 2002 for interim rehefis also dismissed. /——‘ /i Sdl- _ Satish K. Agnihotrl Judge 5; ‘Thakur ‘. Petitiomr M/s Chhattisgarh Mines 8t. Minerals, 9- 10, Ekfma Pahisar, Rajbanda Maidan, Raipur, Through its Paxtncr Shri Kailash Chandra Agrawal, Aged about 46 yeaxs, Son of Shn' Ram Swaroop Agrawal, Contractor, Mofilai Nehru Nagar, West —39/ 12, Bhilai, District : Durg (Chhattisgarh) Versus Respondents 1. The Collector, Surguja, Ambikapur (Chhattisgarh) 2. Tho Mining OfEcer, Ambikap .(ieiGJ 3. The Mining Inspector, Ambika‘ ur (C.G.)