gaalJQ/ BEFORE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 66M /2o11 /J.R. Sahu, S/o Late Shri LR. Sahu, aged about 62 years, Retired Health Supervisor, Shanti Nagar Ward No. 4. Lane No. 3, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) PET!TIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS : /1. State 0f Chhattisgarh, ,4, Chief Medical and Health Officer, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETlTlON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTlTUTlON OF INDIA, @S (m0) Through: the Secretary, Health and Family Welfare 11 ewxx Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) " 2. AccountantGeneraL Pagariya Comptex, Pandri, Near New Bus Stand, Raipur (C.G.) /3. Collector, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) M HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PET!TION (S) NO.664 OF 2011 @Q Petitwner J . R. Sahu Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh 8: Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india) Singie Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :— Shri Anup Majumdar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the State. Shri S.S. Rajput, Advocate for the respondent No.2. ORDER ORAL (Passed on this 4 day of February, 201 1) 1. Learnedcounsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the case, being payment of retirai benefits matter, may be referred to the i pension committee. 2. Shri Thakur, teamed Deputy Advocate General appearing for the State agrees with the submissions made by theiearned oounsei appearing for the petitioner and submits that the request of the petitioner is genuine and proper and the same order may be passed. 3. This Court, in the matter of W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Manda! v, The State of Chhattisgarh & Others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retirai dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. iii Keja Bai Chandrakar v. State Govemment and others) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhatir‘sgarh & Others v. Baijnath Manda! and another). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 315‘ of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642/2004 Baijnath Manda! ‘ (supra) as submitted by learned counsei appearing for the parties. 4. This petition is accordingiy disposed of in the same terms i.e. the office of the Advocate General is directed to send the case tojthe 2 (DJ C Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the petition from the petitioner and this order. Thereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and the officers concerned, within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shaii consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may file additionai documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner be compieted within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. The petitioner shail supply extra copy of the petition to the learned counsel appearing for the respondents for forwarding the same to the Committee. Sd/-' Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Arun i,