IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 9TH JUNE 2011 / 19TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 15472 of 2011(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SEBY.C.O, SON OF OUSEPH, AGED 31 YEARS, HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (PHYSICAL SCIENCE), ST.FRANCIS HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS, MATTOM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 003. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR-680 506. 5. THE MANAGER, ST.FRANCIS HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS, MATTOM, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 602. R1 TO R4 BY GP SMT.NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J. ------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.15472 Of 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 9th DAY OF JUNE, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner seeks the benefit of Exhibit P3 Government Order for getting the appointment approved on a regular basis. 2. The petitioner was appointed as a High School Assistant(Physical Science) for a period of two years from 1.8.2010 to 31.7.2012 as per Exhibit P1 order. The approval was ordered on on daily wage basis as per Exhibit P2. It is pointed out that in terms of Exhibit P3 Government Order, the Manager issued a revised proposal as per Exhibit P4. But the District Educational Officer rejected the proposal stating that without an appellate order he could not consider the same, by Exhibit P5 communication. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed a revision petition as per Exhibit P6. 3. The petitioner seeks for an expeditious disposal of Exhibit P6 revision petition. 4. There will be a direction to the 1st respondent- Government to take a decision on Exhibit P6 revision petition W.P.(C)No.15472/11 -2- after notice to the petitioner and 5th respondent-Manager within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will forward a copy of the Writ Petition along with a copy of this judgment to the 1st respondent for compliance. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Sd/-( T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.) dsn True copy P.A.to Judge