IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20152 of 2008 RAJESH KUMAR @ BHUKHU Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate. For the State: Mr. Upendra Kumar, A.P.P. ----------- 3 4.8.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered under sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that nothing incriminating has been found from the place of occurrence. There is no recovery of any fire arms from the possession of the petitioner. It has been further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case on account of family feud and no inmates or villagers have been examined themselves under section 161 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the State submits that there is direct allegation against the petitioner of firing from point blank range causing death. Son and daughter of the informant as well as sister of the informant who are eye witnesses, as per their statement recorded under section 161 Cr.P.C, have supported the case. In the facts and circumstances of the case, and in view of aforesaid submissions I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. Rahman/ (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)