HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.8022 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 05.05.2011 **** Yash Rani . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Advocate for the petitioner **** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner seeks a mandamus for deciding the departmental appeal said to have been submitted by her way back on 11.04.2005 followed by her written submissions on 06.12.2006. It is claimed that the above- stated appeal has not been decided so far. (2). Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent No.1/Appellate Authority to consider the pending appeal, which may be supplemented with additional material(s), if any, within one month from today and the same shall be decided by the Appellant Authority, preferably after giving an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (3). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. CWP No.8022 of 2011.doc - 2 – 05.05.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge