IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN MONDAY, THE 22ND FEBRUARY 2010 / 3RD PHALGUNA 1931 WA.No. 2340 of 2007() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.36707/2004 Dated 13/06/2007 .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENT NOS.1 & 2 ---------------------------------- 1. THE BRANCH MANAGER, IDUKKI DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, KALLIAR BRANCH, VANNAPPURAM, THODUPUZHA. 2. THE IDUKKI DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, P.B.NO.2, IDUKKI COLONY P.O., IDUKKI. BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER & 3RD RESPONDENT ------------------------------------------ 1. C.M.KURIAKOSE, S/O. MATHAI, RESIDING AT CHEMPAKATHINGAL, VANNAPPURAM P.O., THODUPUZHA. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 BY ADV. SRI.N.RATHEESH SMT.SUMA RATHEESH R2 BY SPL GOVT. PLEADER SMT.ANU SIVARAMAN THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------- W.A.No.2340 OF 2007 & C.M.Appl.1049 OF 2007 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of February, 2010 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. The first respondent is a debtor of the Idukki District Co- operative Bank. He moved for certain reliefs when recovery proceedings were initiated. This Court directed him to make a representation to the Managing Director and further directed that he will be given the benefit of One Time Settlement Scheme. This obviously means that the benefit of the scheme would be given if he is eligible for that relief in accordance with the scheme. For the parties to work out the remedies as directed, the recovery proceedings were stayed for six months. Even that period run out with the passage of time. As of now, what would remain would be merely academic and does not merit WA.2340/07 2 consideration in writ appeal. The writ appeal and the C.M. Application are accordingly dismissed. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. Sd/- P.S.GOPINATHAN, Judge. kkb.22/02.