CR No.6690 of 2010 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.6690 of 2010 (O&M) Decided on : 12-10-2010 Jaspal ....Petitioner VERSUS Avtar Singh ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Mr.Amit Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. MAHESH GROVER, J There is no legal infirmity in the impugned order dated 28.9.2010 vide which evidence of the petitioner was closed. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that only six opportunities were granted to him to adduce his evidence. He contends that if only one opportunity is granted to him, the petitioner will conclude his entire evidence on the date fixed before the Trial Court ie. 15.10.2010. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any legal infirmity in the impugned order but purely in the interest of justice, the impugned order is set aside without issuance of notice of motion to other side as resorting to this process is likely to delay the proceedings further the other side can be compensated with costs. Therefore, the impugned order is set aside, however, subject to payment of Rs.5,000/- as costs and the petitioner as a consequence thereof, shall be granted only one effective opportunity to lead his entire evidence on the CR No.6690 of 2010 (O&M) 2 date fixed before the Trial Court ie. 15.10.2010. The Trial Court shall afford only one effective opportunity on the date fixed for the said purpose and in no eventuality shall grant the petitioner more than one opportunity. Disposed of. October 12, 2010 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge