IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 4TH JANUARY 2008 / 14TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 525 of 2008(K) ------------------------------------- (O.P.(ELECTION)43/05 PENDING BEFORE MUNSIFF COURT,PARAPPANANGADI) PETITIONER: --------------------- MADAPPALLI HAMZAKUTTY, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O.KUNGUMOHAMMED, CHETTALIPARAMBA (HOUSE), CHEMMAD, TRIKULAM, THIRURANGADI, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.JESWIN P.VARGHESE RESPONDENT: ----------------------- CHAPPANGATHIL HYDRU HAJI, AGED 70 YEARS, S/O.KUNHAHAMMED, CHAPPANGATHIL HOUSE, KODINHI, CHEMMAD, TRIKULAM, THIRURANGADI, KOZHIKODE. 676306. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss M.N. KRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.C. NO. 525 OF 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 4th day of January, 2008. J U D G M E N T This writ petition is preferred for a direction to the Munsiff, Parappanangadi to consider and pass orders in I.A.1565 and 1566/07 in Ele.O.P.43/05. I am informed that the case stands posted for judgment on 7.1.08. As early as on 30.10.07 two applications are filed one with a prayer to reopen the evidence and another for sending the matter for an expert report. This Court while disposing of W.P.C.31953/07 had made an observation that at any stage if the Court feels that for a proper adjudication of the matter a comparison of signature by an expert is necessary, the Court may so direct. Whatever it may be, when an application is filed with a prayer to reopen and consider the application for sending the matter to an expert, it is rudimentary that the Court consider those applications before pronouncing the judgment in the case. Therefore I direct the Munsiff, Parappanangadi to consider and dispose of the W.P.C 525 OF 2008 -:2:- above two interim applications after hearing both sides before pronouncing the judgment. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/-