IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 3RD JUNE 2008 / 13TH JYAISHTA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1722 of 2008() ------------------------------ CC.109/2005 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I, KOCHI .................... REVN. PETITIONER: 1ST ACCUSED ----------------------------- THEJ RAJ MALLAR, S/O.GOVINDA MALAR, PROPRIETOR, M/S.KRISHNA OIL MILS, PAYYANNOOR, KANNOOR DIST. BY ADV. SRI.H.HAMZA ROWTHER SRI.V.K.PEERMOHAMED KHAN RESPONDENTS: STATE AND COMPLAINANT ----------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 2. K.K.KUNJI KOMU, PROPRIETOR , SEETHI OIL MILS,ERIYAD PO., KODUNGALLOOR BY ADV. SRI. C.M. NAZER, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR , J. ========================== Crl.R.P. No.1722 of 2008 ========================== Dated this the 3rd day of June, 2008. ORDER The petitioner who is the 1st accused in C.C. No. 109 of 2005 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Kochi for offenes punishable under Sections 419 and 120 B r/w Section 34 IPC, challenges the order dated 24.01.2008 passed by the Magistrate framing charge against the petitioner and others for the aforementioned offences. 2. It is too early to accept the petitioner's contention that there is no material in support of the prosecution case that the accused made false transactions through online for the unauthorised purchase of two units of coconut oil and thereby cheated the de facto complainant by impersonation. I do not find any good ground to interfere with the order passed by the Magistrate framing charge against the petitioner and others. It is upto the petitioner to face trial and try to secure an order of acquittal. This revision is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. rv