IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS SUMMONS SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.168 OF 2007 FOR JUDGMENT NO.168 OF 2007 FOR JUDGMENT NO.168 OF 2007 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 972 OF 2006 SUIT NO. 972 OF 2006 SUIT NO. 972 OF 2006 M.J. Patel (India) Ltd. ... Plaintiff. V/s. Mertex UK Ltd. ... Defendant. Mr. J.M. Sidhwa i/b. Mr. A.M. Joshi for the Plaintiff. Mrs. F. Philip i/b. Singhania & Partners for the Defendant. CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J. : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J. : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J. 18TH 18TH 18TH JUNE 2007. JUNE 2007. JUNE 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. :- :- :- . The genuineness and authenticity of the fax message at Exhibit ‘A’ to the plaint has been seriously disputed and it has been urged that the Defendant was not engaged for the purpose of procuring orders but only to assist in the technical specifications. Serious triable issue arise. Unconditional leave is accordingly granted to defend the suit. 2. The written statement to be filed within a period of 6 weeks from today. The Summons for Judgment is disposed of accordingly. ----