IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 4TH APRIL 2008 / 15TH CHAITHRA 1930 RP.No. 931 of 2007(M) -------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.27219/2000 Dated 21/11/2006 .................... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS --------------------- 1. CENTRE FOR WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT(CWRDM)EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, REPRESENTED BY SRI. K.R.PRASANNAKUMAR WORKING PRESIDENT, KUNNAMANGALAM, KOZHIKODE-673571. 2. K.R.PRASANNAKUMAR, TECHNICAL OFFICER(GRADE II), CENTRE FOR WATER RESOURCES MUSEUM, CWRDM, KUNNAMANGALAM P.O., KOZHIKODE-673571. 3. SREEVALLABHAN.S., TECHNICAL OFFICER(GRADE II), GROUND WATER DIVISION, CWRDM, KUNNAMANGALAM P.O., KOZHIKODE-673571. 4. M.K.RADHAKRISHNAN, TECHNICAL ASSISTANT(GRADE IV), GROUND WATER DIVISION, CWRDM, KUNNAMANGALAM P.O., KOZHIKODE-673571. 5. C.K.GOPINATHAN, TECHNICAL ASSISTANT(GRADE III), MOS UNIT, CWRDM, KUNNAMANGALAM P.O., KOZHIKODE-673571. BY ADV. SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J. RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS ------------------------ 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R.P. NO.931/2007 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE CENTRE FOR WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT, KUNNAMANGALAM, KOZHIKODE, REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. 4. COUNCIL OF SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH(CSIR), REPRESENTED BY THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, CSIR HEAD QUARTER, ANUSANDHAN BHAVAN, RAFI MARG, NEW DELHI. BY ADV. SRI.G.P.SHINOD GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.D.SOMASUNDARAM, ADDL.CGSC THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: KURIAN JOSEPH, J. --------------------------------------- R.P.No.931 OF 2007 IN O.P.No.27219 OF 2000 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of April, 2008. O R D E R This is a petition for review the judgment dated 21.11.2006. According to the petitioners, Ext.R1 order has not been taken note of by this Court while passing the judgment. It is seen that the petitioners have pursued a writ appeal as W.A.No.990/2007. The same was disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to move for a review. After having heard the counsel on both sides, it is fairly clear that the matter has to be considered afresh in view of Annexure A1. Therefore, the judgment dated 21.11.2006 is recalled. Post the original petition for hearing. It will be open to the respondents to file additional counter affidavits, if required. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. ps KURIAN JOSEPH, J. R.P. No. 931 OF 2000 O R D E R 04.04.2008