IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SLA No.66 of 2007 RAMESH PRASAD KHETAN Versus 1. NARENDRA PRASAD KHETAN 2. SURENDRA PRASAD KHETAN 3. SAJJAN PRASAD KHETAN 4. DIPAK PRASAD KHETAN 5. THE STATE OF BIHAR For the petitioner :Mr.Dronachrya For the State : Mr.Indu Bala Pandey,APP ----------- 3. 12.01.2009 Heard. The complainant-petitioner has taken exception to the judgment and order of acquittal recorded by the learned trial court. It appears that opposite parties herein are agnates and were tried for the charges punishable under sections 147, 148, 341, 379, 427 and 504 IPC. The learned trial court, on appreciation of evidence brought on record, has granted them the benefit of doubt. This Court perused the judgment and particularly the reasonings assigned in paragraph 12 and 13. The consideration of the matter by the learned trial court cannot be said to be patently illegal. This Court finds no merit in this application which is accordingly dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )