IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1131 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 253 OF 2000 Smt. Nirmala Trikamdas Guri ....Plaintiff Versus Trikamdas Kalyanji Guri & Ors. ....Defendants Mr. D. M. Joshi, Advocate for Plaintiff. Mr. A. K. Tripathi i/b. Mr. Shailesh Shukla for Defendant No.2. Mr. V. N. Solanki, Defendant Nos. 3 to 5. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATE : 19TH NOVEMBER, 2009. P.C. : Heard learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. The plaintiff failed to serve an amended copy of the plaint upon the Defendant No.2 within the time prescribed under the order dated 4th August, 2009 and therefore, the Defendant No.2 could not file additional written statement within prescribed time as stated in the said order. The learned Counsel for the Defendant No.2 submits that the additional written statement is ready but the office is not accepting the same on the ground that it is not filed within the prescribed limit. 3. Since, the amended copy of the plaint was not served upon the Defendant No.2 within the prescribed limit, the Office is directed to accept the additional written statement of the Defendant No.2, if filed within a period of one week from today. Sd/- (R. V. MORE, J.)