THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.1378 of 2008 Between: Smt.K.V.Narasayyamma and another. .. PETITIONERS and The District Collector, Visakhapatnam and others. .. RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.1378 of 2008 ORDER: It is the case of the petitioners that they are the daughters of the 4th respondent, who is aged about 80 years. At the time of their marriages, the 4th respondent promised and announced that out of 102 acres owned by him, 20 acres of the land in Sy.Nos.3/1, ¾, 5/2, 5/9 and 4/2 situated at Gangasani Agraharam, Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, will be given to both the petitioners. If the said property is the self-acquired property of the 4th respondent, it is the will and wish of the 4th respondent to enjoy the same and neither the sons nor the daughters will get any right. If the said property is an ancestral property, then the successors of the ancestor are entitled to the share. Admittedly, the petitioners have not made any foundation as to how they are entitled to the property except stating that there was a promise made by the 4th respondent. If there is any promise made by the father of the petitioners i.e., 4th respondent, it is open for the petitioners to work out their remedies elsewhere. But, however, the 3rd respondent issued notice in Rc.No.226/2006, dated 30-12-2007, with regard to issuance of pattadar pass books and title deeds, stating that the respective parties will be given an opportunity to represent their case before the Tahsildhar and Recording Authority, Anandapuram, and accordingly, they are requested to appear on 18-01-2008. Therefore, it is open for the petitioners to file their objections and representations, if any, if they have any right or interest over the property. Hence, the said disputed question of fact cannot be decided in the writ petition and the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 29-01-2008 Prv