1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4432 OF 2008 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.40 OF 2001 Daulat Gaindal Patil APPLICANT VERSUS Smt. Sojabai Narayan Patil and others. RESPONDENTS .... Mr. S. P. Shah, Advocate for applicant Mr.P.S. Pawar holding for Mr.S. P. Brahme, Advocate for respondent nos.2 and 3. .... (CORAM : K. U. CHANDIWAL, J) DATE :5th January, 2010. ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ PER COURT : 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. The respondent no.1 expired. There is delay in making application to set aside the abatement. Considering the genuine difficulties, since there is controversy about the death of respondent no.1 by the learned Counsel representing original respondent no.1, the names of legal representatives as disclosed by the applicant be brought on record within 14 days. The 2 delay is condoned. The application is allowed as above. (K. U. CHANDIWAL) JUDGE gas/ca4432.08