IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.17963-M of 2010 Date of Decision:28.2.2011 Sharun and another .... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Aman Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sidharth Sarup, D.A.G. Haryana. None for respondents No.5 to 7. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 to 4 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.5 to 7. At the time of issuing notice of motion, detailed order dated 29.6.2010 was passed and the interim directions were issued that in case the petitioners approach respondents No.2 to 4 setting out their grievances as have been made in the present petition, the same would be looked into by them independently and in accordance with law. The order was passed 8 months ago. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with a direction that in case petitioners still have any threat perception, they are at liberty to approach the concerned SP, who shall look into and take appropriate measures in accordance with law. 28.2.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE