THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.1640 of 2010 Date:07.02.2011 Between: Smt. Ameena Begum ..... Petitioner AND Gulzar Natarajan and others .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: None appeared Counsel for Respondents: Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue The Court made the following: ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 27.09.2010 in W.P.No.23852 of 2010. The petitioner is continuously unrepresented during the past two hearings. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. I have heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and perused the counter-affidavit filed by respondent No.2. This Court by its order dated 27.09.2010 in W.P.No.23852 of 2010, while disposing of the writ petition filed by the petitioner, observed that it is the duty and responsibility of the respondents to protect the property in question and prevent danger to the human life. It has further directed the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation and take appropriate measures in that regard. Alleging that the said representation is not disposed of and no protective measures were taken to prevent recurrence of the incident of wall collapse leading to a death, the present Contempt Case is filed by the petitioner. From the counter-affidavit filed by respondent, it is inter alia stated that the petitioner’s representation was disposed of on 02.02.2011, wherein it is stated that in order to grab the land in question, the petitioner has raised the compound wall and that she is wholly responsible for collapse of the wall for which a criminal case has been registered against her. It is further stated that as there is no possibility of encroachment of land from the southern side as there is vertiginous slope for the land on southern side, there is no need for a wall and that the property is being safeguarded by the Tahsildar, Shaikpet Mandal, without allowing any encroachment. In view of the above noted averments in the counter-affidavit, I do not find any merit in this contempt case and the same is accordingly dismissed. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 07th February, 2011 GHN