IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 164 of 2011. [O&M] Date of Decision: 10th February, 2011. Avtar Singh Petitioner through Mr. T.P.Singh, Advocate Versus ICICI Bank & Another Respondents through Mr. Rohit Suri, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner seeks a Mandamus for directing the respondent Bank to settle his accounts after receiving the amount in lump-sum. Learned counsel for the respondents has handed-over a complete statement of accounts to the petitioner who shall now be at liberty to make a representation to the respondent Bank for settlement of his accounts. If any such representation is made, the respondent Bank is directed to consider and dispose of the same, in accordance with law. If ultimately the accounts are settled to the satisfaction of both the parties, No Dues Certificate shall be issued to the petitioner. Disposed of. Dasti. February 10, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE