IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. 2192 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.11.2011 Vijay Mehta and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Jitender Dhanda, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anmol Malik, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. …… RAJESH BINDAL, J. Challenge in the present petition is to the order passed by the learned court below wherein the petitioners were summoned to face trial under Section 319 Cr.P.C. Along with the petition, an application seeking condonation of delay of 301 days in filing thereof has been filed. The reason given for the delay is that the petitioners were under the impression that the quashing petition against the impugned order has to be filed. However, the fact remains that no quashing petition was filed within reasonable time from the date of passing of the order of learned court below. The present petition has been filed with a delay of 301 days and the reason given for condonation of delay is not sufficient to condone such a huge delay. Accordingly the application for condonation of delay of 301 days is dismissed, consequently, the revision petition is also dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 18.11.2011 sharmila