HiQH COURT OF CHHATTISGARM: BILASPUR Writ Petiti&n (Sl No. 318S ot 2008 11 Petitjoner Baimukund Yadu, S/o. Shri Narayan Prasad Yadu, aged abQL't 52 years, Assistant Teacher, Govsrnment Primary Schooi, Mohands, Bfock Abhanpur, District Raipur (CG). Resoondeiits Versys 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Educatlon Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2) District Education Offlcer, Raipur, District Raipur (CG). 3) Block Education OfRcer, Abhanpur, District Raipur (CG). (Writ Petition under Articie 226/227 ofthe Constitution of tndia.) SB: Hon'bteMr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Presesit Shri V,K/Tekam, counsel for the petitioner Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 25th day ofJune, 2QQQ} With consent of iearned counseS appearlng for the parties, the matter Is neard finaily. 2) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed as Assistant Teacher in 1980 on a fixed pay scale of Rs. 150 /- for a period of t^o years. After compietion of two years probation, the petitioner was granted reguiar pay soaie. He further submits that the issue involved in the case is asto whether the petitioner is entitied to r^uiar pay scaie wfth effect from the date of initiai appointment or after compietion of probatlon period. 3) The issue invotved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Triburfal, Jabaipur in O.A.No.2745/89 ( Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs State of M.P. & others), wherein it was hetd that the simiJarly situated <l, Raju - 2_- teachers are entitied to reguiar pay scaie w.e.f. the date of inifial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon'bte Supreme Court. The appeat was dismtesed by the Hon'bie Supreme Court, uphoiding the decision of the Tribunai to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regutar pay scaie from date of initiat appointment 4) Sn vsew of the above stated submissions made by learned counsef for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in the same terms i.e., the petittener is granted iiberty to make a representation, if so advlsed, to consider the petitioner's case, if he stands cn the same footings as per order dated 24-8-1992 by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunai, Jabaipur, in O.A.No. 2745 of 89 (Madhukant Yadu (supra) and subsequentty confirm@j by order dated 3-1-1994 passed by the Hon'bie Supreme Court in Speciai Leave Petition (Civii) No. 6892/93 and grant relief accordingSy. 5) in view of foregoing, the petition is disposecl of. No crder as to coste. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge