ssp 1 WP 1477 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1477 OF 2011 Lilabai Dinkar Atkar and Ors. .....Petitioners versus Sai Satguru Apartment Sahakari Griha Nirman Sanstha Ltd. and Ors. ..... Respondents Mr.S.K.Dubey, for the petitioners. Mr.S.A.Sawant i/by Mr.H.V.Kode, for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr.G.D.Utangale, for respondent No.4. Mr.D.A.Nalawade, Govt. Pleader, for respondent Nos.5, 6 and 9. Ms.P.A.Purandare, for respondent No.7. CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR & R.M.SAVANT, JJ. DATE: 18 th AUGUST, 2011 P.C. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he is not pressing prayer clause (a) of the petition. The said statement is accepted. 2. The structures in question have been demolished pursuant to an order dated 07-12-2010 passed in Writ Petition No.2315 of 2010. It is stated across the Bar by the learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 3 that the petitioners have been granted permanent alternate accommodation in the SRA scheme. It is contended on behalf of the petitioners that the structures which have been demolished are not the part of the land covered by the SRA scheme. It is not possible for us to ssp 2 WP 1477 of 2011 countenance such a submission in our extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. 2. However, it will be open to the petitioners to adopt such proceedings to get their title established by leading evidence in respect of the portion of the lands in question. If such proceedings are filed, needless to say that such proceedings would be decided on their own merits and in accordance with law, uninfluenced by the instant order. ( R.M.SAVANT, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )