IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4864 of 2010 BIPIN YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.12298 of 2010 ARUN YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 21/04/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioners are not named in the First Information Report but subsequently their names transpired in the confessional statement of the co-accused as well as one witness who stated that he over heard the petitioner and Bipin Yadav along with two other co-accused persons of having talked about firing at the deceased, which reveals their complicity. In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial in view of the seriousness of the nature of the offence. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)