IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH: HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.767 OF 2010 BETWEEN: Smt. Prasuna Devi …. Petitioner AND U. Siva Rama Krishna Rao and another …. Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.767 OF 2010 ORDER: None appeared for the petitioner on 22-06-2010 both during before lunch session and after lunch session. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption of ‘for dismissal’. Inspite of it, today also the petitioner’s counsel is absent. There is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the revision petition. 2. This revision is filed by the de facto complainant against order of acquittal dated 22-06-2006 recorded by the XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Mahila Court) Hyderabad in C.C. No.132 of 2003. In view of Section 401 (3) Cr.P.C. order of acquittal passed by the lower Court cannot be converted into order of conviction in this Revision Petition. 3. It is contention of the petitioner in the grounds of Revision that no opportunity was given to the revision petitioner to depose her case before the trial Court. It is a police case in the lower Court. The case was pending in the lower Court for three long years. Inspite of it, the police could not produce any witness before the lower Court. Inspite of filing this revision petition also, the petitioner nor her counsel appeared before this Court. 4. In these circumstances, the lower Court rightly closed the prosecution evidence and delivered judgment acquitting the accused. There are no merits in this revision petition. 5. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed. __________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J June 23, 2010 KTL