THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI C.R.P.No.4241 of 2009 ORDER: This civil revision petition is directed against an order dated 4.6.2009 passed in IA No. 246 of 2004 in OS No. 1322 of 2009 by the X Jr. Civil Judge, City Civil Courts, Hyderabad, wherein the request of the petitioner to direct the respondents to deposit the ballot papers was negatived. Revision petitioner herein is the petitioner/plaintiff and the respondents herein are the respondents/defendants in the impugned petition. Revision petitioner filed IA No. 246 of 2009 in O.S. No. 1322 of 2009 seeking a direction to the respondents to deposit the ballot papers pertaining to the post of General Secretary, NGOs Staff Association election, Osmania University, Hyderabad which was held on 9-1-2009 stating that the counting officer and counting members were new to the procedure and they did not follow the procedure and votes were declared invalid without proper scrutiny or examination and number of ballot papers in which votes were cast in his favour by putting ‘X’ mark against his name were not counted in his favour and as such the result went against him and 4th respondent was elected to the post of General Secretary with a credit of two votes only. It is also the case of the petitioner that he made a representation to the registrar of University seeking permission to verify the ballot papers but the same was rejected. As against the orders of R-1 the petitioner preferred an appeal to the appellate authority i.e., Vice Chancellor of R-1 for furnishing the information, but the same was not furnished by them. The respondent therein contested the matter by filing a counter stating that the petitioner has not protested for the alleged irregularities raised by the petitioner and the counting process was completed by the concerned authorities and after taking objections, if any, the successful candidates were declared. It is also stated that as there was no protest, the authorities proceeded further in counting of votes and declaration of elected candidates. The petitioner after lapse of five days approached the respondents and lodged a complaint after the ballot paper bundles were kept in a box and handed over to the Chief Election Officer & Chairman. It is also stated that the main relief claimed by the petitioner has to be adjudicated only after full trial but not at the interlocutory stage and the petition is liable to be dismissed. Upon considering the material placed before him the learned X Junior Civil Judge, dismissed the petition. Hence, the present revision petition. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner and perused the order under revision. A perusal of the order would go to show that the petitioner has not raised any objection at an earliest point of time and after lapse of five days of declaration of results he made a representation under Right to Information Act for verification of ballot papers. The learned Junior Civil Judge has rightly observed that if really the petitioner has got any grievance with regard to the counting of votes and the manner in which the votes were counted he would have made an objection at the time of counting of votes and before the declaration of results. The silence on the part of the petitioner would show his negligence about his rights and having allowed the procedure to be followed and after lapse of five days making a representation would not serve any purpose on the part of the petitioner. Under the above circumstances, the learned Junior Civil Judge rightly rejected the request made by the petitioner and I do not see any reason to interfere with the said order. Accordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed. ____________ 17-09-2009 Kvrk/rkk THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI C.R.P.No.4241 of 2009 17th September 2009