IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.744 of 2010 1. The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited through its Manging Director Sone Bhawan , Birchand Patel Path, P.S.Sachivalaya, Distt-Patna. 2. The Managing Director, The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited,Sone Bhawan, Birchand Patel Path, P.S.Sachivalaya, Distt-Patna 3. The Chief of Administration, The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited Sone Bhawan, Birchand Patel Path, P.S.Sachivalaya, Distt-Patna 4. The District Manager, The Bihar State Food And Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, District Office-Samastipur, P.S.Samastipur, Distt-Samastipur Respondents-Appellants. Versus Bisheshwar Dutt Singh S/O Late Kalika Singh Resident of House No. C/81, Prabhu Nath Nagar, North of Sheo Mandir, P.S.Mufasil Chhapra, Distt-Chapra Petitioner-Respondent. ----------- 07 05.07.2011 Heard Mr.Amarendra Narayan Rai for the appellants and Mr.Bishnu Kant Dubey for the respondent. 2. This appeal under clause 10 of the Letters Patent of the High Court of Judicature at Patna arises out of order dated 03.07.2008, passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in CWJC No.4083 of 2008 (Bisheshwar Dutt Singh Vrs. The Bihar State Food & Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. & ors.), whereby the writ petition has been allowed and the benefit of enhancement of retirement age from 58 to 60 years has been granted to the employees of the appellant Corporation. This is identical to the subject matter of LPA No.850 of 2009 (The Bihar State Food & Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. & ors. Mahendra Pratap Singh), and the analogous L.P.A.No.922 of 2009 (The Bihar State Food & Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. & ors. Vrs. Maha Shankar Prasad),which have been dismissed by a Division Bench of this Court, as a result of which the order of the learned single Judge in writ petitions of those matters have been 2 upheld. In other words, the Division Bench has held that the learned single Judge in those writ petitions has rightly granted the benefit of enhancement age from 58 to 60 years. 3. We have no doubt that the present appeal is fully covered by the judgment dated 22.2.2011, passed in those two appeals. 4. The present appeal is accordingly dismissed. psc (S.K.Katriar,J) (Vikash Jain, J.)