- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.47 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.545 OF 2007 Satish Dnyaneshwar Jagtap. .. Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondent -- S/Shri Mahesh Jethmalani, Sr.Counsel, i/by K.S.Patil, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri P.S.Hingorani, APP for the Respondent. -- CORAM : SRI R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & SRI A.A.SAYED, JJ DATED : 1ST FEBRUARY, 2008 P.C. 1. Heard. Undisputedly, all other three accused have been released on bail under Order dated 27th June, 2007 passed in Criminal Application No.663 of 2007. Apart from the recovery at the instance of the present applicant, there is no difference as regards the role of the applicant herein in comparison to the role played by other accused in the matter in hand as is disclosed from the judgment passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Pune and the evidence recorded before - 2 - him. 2. In the circumstances, applying the rule of parity, we find no difference in the case of the applicant with that of the other applicants and hence the application for bail is allowed on the same grounds as were applied to other applicants viz. the applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with one or two solvent sureties in the like amount. The applicant shall furnish his residential address with Loni Kalbhor Police Station, Pune, and shall report to the said Police Station on any day of the first week of every month. 3. The application stands disposed of. ( R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J) ( A.A.SAYED, J )