HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WP. (S) No.7540 of 2097 PETITIONER Shayam Sunder Samai Sio- lndrajeet Samal, aged about 60 years, Occupation- Assistant Teacher at primary Schooi, Basana, District Mahasamund (C.G.) Versus RESPDNDENTS 1 8tate of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department 0f School Education. D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) District Education Offtcer, Di5trict- Mahasamund (C.G.) Biock Education Officer, Biock -— Basana, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) WRIT PETiTlON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIGN OF iNDiA Apgearance: Shri F3. Khare, counsel fer the petitioner. Shri Su'mit Verma, Panel Lawyer for the State on advance copy. mam. oaoea (20.12.2(307) . SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J Hoard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the case is as to whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scaie w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. He submits that the issue involved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunai, Jabaipur in 0A. No.2745i89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of MP. and others), wherein, it was held that the similariy situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon’bie Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civii) No.68§2!93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scaie from the date of initial appointment. counse Leémed t. of Chhattisgarh a State Gov order dated 1 initia1 ap squareiy covered by r va‘m Sahu and another (su in View of that, Howev State regar 2 WPLs5 No.754omm ' § for the petitioner in Ram further Kumar $ubm‘ats Ssahu that and ih‘xs others Court, Vs. another (W.P.(S) sca\e No.813 w.e.f. of the 2007) date by of wh‘ne consider‘mg the same issue nd 2.2.2001 has g!anted {egutar pay tiy submits the: this case is paintment. Learned oounsei pra‘). the fa decision the parties of this loin Couit in the case of Ram Kumar e terms. made by the s iiications this petitio iowed in the sam h is ai er, this order ehaii be subiect to aii ver n the petition. ' sar— Sunii Kumar Sinha 1 Judge ding facts pieaded i @