Bi B!"M^,^MA.':.y -A' '"''~"""''INTHEHIGHCOURT_QFCHHAmSGARHATBILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) ^o^ <y •nf~]^ .^ Contempt Pctition No. ^~/\ /2009. c^ ^ f> • Vww^ ^ (Arismgoutoforderd^ted 14.02.08 passedinwrit petition (S) No. 4990/2007 by Hon'ble High Court.) PETITIONERS: '^: ^^.^ 1. Krishna Chand Nayak, son of Sora Ram Nayak, aged about 39 years,wprkirig as Waterman, Govt. HigherSecondary School,'JaB!lgaon, R/o Patrapali:, Tahsil Raigarh District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 2. Ugaii Sai, S/o of Late Lal Sai, aged about 46 years,workingas^Watennan,Govt. Higher Secondary Schopl, Jamgaon, R/o Jamgaon, Tahsil Sarangrah, District Raigarh, C.G. 3. Heera Lal Sao, S/o Gokul Prasad Sao,' aged about 39 years, Wdrkitig as Waterinan, Govt. Higher Secondaty School, Godam, R/o Bunga, Tahsil Raigarh, District Raigarh, C.G. 4. Brijmohan Smgh, S/0 Badri Prasad Singh, aged about 39 years, Working as Peon Gdvt. Higher SeGondaiy School, Ulkhar, (Sarangarh), R/<}.Banjaii, Tahsil Sarangarti, Bistnet Raigarh, C.G. 5. MohitRain, S/o QfSa.nt Rani.ageda.bout 49 years, working as Peon, R/o Orada TahsU Kharsia, DistriGt Raigarh, C.G. 6. Bhyan LalToppo, S/Q Daulat Ram Toppo, aged about 46 years, working as Peon, Govt.iligher Secondary Schopl, ;- Kosir, R/o Banora, Tahsil and District Raigarh,C.G. 7.Ru.PushRlata,Sidar,D/oofShriAkbar Sidar, aged abolit 46 yeara, working as : Waterman, Govt. High^r Secondary SchoolTaricela, Tahsil and District : Raigarh, G.G. 8. Tika Ram, S/p qfSakhi Ram.aged about 4&years, workinglas Peoii, R/oofTafasil Sarangarh, Distnct Raigarh, (;.©. S.MphanLaliXsdavS/oHeerat.aI'^adav, gged about^S years^worla^ R/Q ofSaTangaTftt^I^sUSarangarh,^^^^^ : District Raigrah, C.G. Versus Respondents (Conteinnors) 1. Shri Nand Kumar, Education Secretary, Departinent of Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2/ Shri Ashok Kumar Bhargav, District Education Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Presently posted as District Education Officer, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh. CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT. ieli "TS k^. ~T- sy^yv R-<i+ w sn^i *4w Tiinnanal — 'S'sf •^i'4id<4, ®Ti1<H'i(B,Iqiniyy fc)t^.^2^-5 HIHWI a>*(ich •••••••••---•••••••-"^--••---•^^200 an^T 'T?^ (i^ci(^sii^T) TOnw^tefsn^r SB: Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava. J. 23-09-2011 None for the petittoners, cni^IcT^i lfl4<?ff'£f^£r<pf|^R. ^iafiman^r teven in the second round. Earlier, notices were dirdcted to be issued on 21-01-2009. However, process fee has not been paid. Now, an applcation has been moved by the petitioners for withdrawal of t^e petition on a statement that petition has become infructuous. In view of the fact that n and now the petitionere have petition on a statement that th^ petition is rendered infructuous and in the absence of there being any compliance ofthe Court order, (ule is discharged. Accordingly, the petitfon o representation is made by the petitionere noved an application for withdrawal of the speciffc all^ation with regard to non- B closed. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge \-