3?n^r ^»TR;^i<4» ^WT 3TT^T srs^w ^,1 -, •^ET ^II^H^, ^Til^i^Ko, [®i<ni<H^< H11CTI WNN? "Wt 200 ^n^T 'q^r (^f^^) ^CTWlrf^^T^T SIN6LE BBMCH: HON'Bt W.P. m No.1903/08 CONB^ Baljjnderj about 44 ©auhati Nagar, H^thkoj Singh, 5/o Shri ^urnam Singh, Aged yecrs. Occupation-Proprsetor M/s Bombay Corriers/ 2/47/ Transport tthkoj. Bhifai (C.0.) Vs RESPONDB^rrS 1. Com^nissioner of Income Tax, Department of I^icorRe Tax, Raipur (C^) 2. Inco^ne Tax Officer, Ward-5 Aayakar Bhav|ran, New Civic Centre, Bhiiai (C@) 08.04.2008 AAr. Sumesh Bcycy & Miss Mr. Amit Choudhary, Stand| Heard. This petitjon js directed 17.3.2cx)8 p<^ed by the Comm{ss| the applicatjon of the petitioner preferred agdnst the order of 28.12.2007 (Annexure P-4) has be^ Learned counsel for the impugned order it would be evide^t cryptic manner without assigning appelfate stage, ywr re<fuest for stcy af demo^d i§ hereby n wut^ cbl^fd^l^ ^HdT ^f 'feTst iFt^K ^37fm3Ti^T E JUSTECE &HIRBIDRA MISHRA D^epali Pandey, Advocates for the petitioner. |ng Counsel for the respondents. jagainst the order of Annexure P-1 dated joner, Income Tax (Appeals), Roipur whereby for grant of stcy filed along with the appeal a^sessment by the Income Tax Officer dated |^n rejected. p|etitioner submits that from perusal of the that tihe same hos been passed in Q most |any recison with oaii observation that 'ff^ the mt be acceded ta. Therefore, cppficathn ^/e€ted/. The above order has been passed ?1I^7T ^T ^D^, <H-li^licj —FS/197—3/2008 —40,000. XI-HG—78 ^TT^T ^T f^fNp)' TTSTT W^T^TT^ \ --' •k bNp^. 's'^ ^t^icn^, ^\ii-(-i4i(o, [®i(ni'>-i^< HWWt ^bNI^ '3^^ T^T (^f^^) ^^TW^iaTt^T •^^M5R •H1^ff ^ f^st Tf^R ^affiR^Ti^r without hearir^ the petitioner further submitted that this Commissioner of Income Tox (/ decide the application for stoy w Mr. Choudhary, learned objection if this petition js dispo| Aecordingly, the instant Commissioner of Income TQX application for stoy ond pass r< period of one month from Certified copy as per rulejs (|ierein and without application of mind. It is pejtition may be disposed of by directing the |ippeals), Raipur to rehear the petitjoner and |th reasoned order. ^tanding Counsel for the respondents has no ?fesed of with the above direction. |)etition is dispsed of with a direction to the 1 (Appeols) to rehear the petitioner on his lasoned order jn accordance with lawr within a the d<^e of receipt of copy of this order. Sd/- Db>"»draMistoa Judge