IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.W.P.(T) No. 8435 of 2008 Date of decision: July 21, 2011 Vidya Gandhi Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge For the Petitioner : Mr.Anshul Bansal, Advocate For the State: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K.Verma, Deputy Advocate General. For Respondent No.3: Mr. Ravinder Thakur, C.G.C. ___________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Petitioner prays for continuance upto the age of 60 years. In reply, at paragraph 6(iii), it is stated as follows:- “That the contents of these para are admitted to the extent that the commitment of the Central Government is restricted to reimbursement of only pay and allowances of the NDS staff and not the retirement benefits such as pension, gratuity etc. and rest of the contents are denied. It is important to point out here that the applicant cannot claim benefits, which have been extended to the Central Government Employees because the applicant is not a Central Government employee.” 2 2. There is no rejoinder. The writ petition is hence dismissed. The pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed. ( Justice Kurian Joseph ), Chief Justice July 21, 2011 (K) ( Justice V.K. Sharma ), Judge