IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.1890 OF 2005 Ujwal Rajshekhar Patil : Petitioner V/s. The General Manager Telecom Division & Anr. : Respondents ... Mrs. Badadane instructed by Mr. P.R. Arjunwadkar for the petitioner. None present for the respondents. ... CORAM : DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J. & S.A. BOBDE, J. DATE : MARCH 28, 2005. P.C.: 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order 13.5.2003. By this order, the petitioner's application for appointment on compassionate ground has been rejected. The reasons are reproduced below:­ “The committee has gone through the details of the case with reference to the following points: Terminal benefits:­ Rs.3,93,348/­. Family pension of Rs.2800/­ p.m. is being paid to the applicant as the only legal successor. Movable/immovable property:­ Living house. The divorced wife of late Shri R.H. Patil, 2 Smt.Sadhna R. Patil, who is the mother of Shri Ujwal R. Patil, is serving as a clerk in the court at Barsi. Size of the family:­ Only two members, out of which the mother is already serving and the other is the applicant.” 2. In view of the detailed reasons mentioned by the Assistant General Manager (Admn.) in his order dated 13.5.2003, no interference is called for in our extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution. This petition being devoid of any merit is, accordingly, dismissed. Sd/­ CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/­ S.A. BOBDE, J.