IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9159 of 2011 ADITYA KUMAR CHARTERJI Versus SATISH KUMAR ----------- 02. 23.06.2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ application has been filed against the order dated 13.09.2010 passed by learned Sub Judge Ist, Muzaffarpur in Title Suit No.323 of 2009 whereby the application for amendment in the plaint has been allowed by the Court below. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that while allowing the amendment application, the learned Court below has awarded cost of Rs.250/- also. It appears that by this amendment, the plaintiff sought to correct the plot No.232 (Ka) to 226 (Ja) on the ground that because of typing mistake in place of plot No.226 (Ka), it has been wrongly typed as 232 (Ka). Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, I find no reason to interfere with the impugned order in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. The petitioner may file additional written statement, if so advised against amended portion only. Sanjeev/- (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)