THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO.24398 of 2008 Date:05.10.2009 Between:- Smt Perelli Chandramma .. Petitioner And Government of A.P., rep. By its Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others. .. Respondents ORDER: The writ petition is filed seeking a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not conducting any enquiry and passing any orders on the representation dated 06.04.2006 submitted by the petitioner inspite of repeated visits as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to enquire into the matter and take appropriate action on the said representation. The case of the petitioner, as averred in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, is that her son by name Srinivas was falsely implicated in a case vide Crime No.12 of 1997 under Section 306 I.P.C; that on the date of the alleged offence, her son was juvenile and studying 10th class but was implicated in the alleged crime at the instance of third parties. It is also her case that because of the trouble created by the third parties, she had to take shelter in the neighbouring village. The third parties namely Chimata Madara, Monde Lingaiah, Galenka Srinu, T.Sastry and Indrapalli Janaiah belong to the upper class community, whereas the petitioner belongs to the schedule caste community (Madiga). In view of the threat given by the said persons, she submitted a written representation dated 06.04.2006 to the respondents but no action has been taken by them. Therefore, she filed the present writ petition. Based on the written instructions from the concerned police, it is submitted that the allegations laid against the respondents by the petitioners are false. He further submits that one Thanda Jamuna, D/o.Yellaiah, 15 years, R/o.Avanthipuram studied upto 5th class. Her marriage was arranged with one of her relatives but the son of the petitioner - Srinu tried to develop love affair with her without her consent and sent a love letter to her. On 09.02.1997, the parents of the girl went to settle the marriage with their relative’s boy. Srinu and his friend went to the house of the girl and threatened her to marry him and created nuisance. Therefore, the said girl felt insulted and committed suicide by hanging in her house, which resulted in registering a case against Srinu in Crime No.12 of 1997 under Section 306 I.P.C. and in the said crime, Srinu was convicted and sentenced to undergo five years Rigorous Imprisonment. It is also stated that on 12.02.1997, a complaint was lodged by one Pulijala Ravikantha Rao, V.A.O., Allagadapah alleging that on 10.02.1997, about five hundred villagers caught hold of Srinu and another, beat with chappals and tonsured Srinu alleging that they were responsible for committing suicide of Jamuna. On the said complaint, a case in Crime No.13 of 1997 for the offences punishable under Sections 342, 323, 355 I.P.C. and Section 7(d) of P.C.R.Act was registered on 12.2.1997 and the case has been investigated. After investigation, the case was referred as “undetectable” on 06.05.1999, as the accused persons were not identified. It is also submitted that the petitioner – Smt P.Chandramma is residing in her own house provided by the Government at Avanthipuram and she was elected as 5th Ward Member of the Gram Panchayat from Congress-I party. Her son is running an auto rickshaw and eking out his livelihood and staying in the village. At present, there is no threat to the petitioner and her son from the villagers. Therefore, no further action is required with reference to the allegation made by the petitioner. The case of the petitioner is that on 06.04.2006, a complaint has been lodged by the petitioner against Chimata Madara, Monde Lingaiah, Galenka Srinu, Tummalarama Sastry and Indrapalli Janaiah who enimically disposed against the petitioner’s family and due to the trouble created by them, they were made to vacate the village and reside in the neighbouring village. It is submitted by the learned Government Pleader that on investigation, it was found that the petitioner and her son are residing in their own house allotted by the Government and the petitioner was also elected as Member of Gram Panhayat and her son – Sreenu is running an auto rickshaw and eking out his livelihood and at present, there is no threat to the petitioner and her son from the villagers. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respondents, it cannot be said that the police have not taken any action and having regard to the submissions that at present, the petitioner is residing in her own house in the village allotted by the Government, that she was elected as a Member of the Gram Panchayat, that her son is running an auto rickshaw and leading a peaceful life without any threat from the villagers, no orders need be passed in this writ petition. The writ petition is closed. No costs. ___________________ G. CHANDRAIAH, J 5th October, 2009 AMD