- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.302/2009 Shri Yogesh Kesarimal Bedmutha. ...Petitioner.. Versus The State of Maharashtra & others. ...Respondents... ..... Mrs.Sushama Savale, Advocate for petitioner. Shri N.N. Jadhav, APP for respondent no.1. ..... CORAM: P.V. HARDAS & R.K. DESHPANDE,JJ. DATE: 06.07.2009 PER COURT: This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, by which the petitioner prays for issuing a writ directing the respondent no.1 to register an offence against respondent no.2 and to take appropriate steps for investigation of the crime committed by the respondent no.2. It appears that - 2 - a report came to be lodged by the petitioner and on the basis of the said report, an offence vide Crime No.127/2008 came to be registered on the same day i.e. On 25.8.2008 for offences punishable u/ss.420, 471, 467 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code. In the first information report, the petitioner had named only three accused. However, during investigation, it transpired that the respondent no.2 had also committed an offence and accordingly an offence came to be registered against the respondent no.2. Since the respondent no.2 is absconding, all efforts are taken by the respondent no.1 for tracing the absconding accused – respondent no.2. All this is disclosed by the respondent no.1 in the affidavit in reply. In the light of the affidavit in reply and the steps highlighted by the respondent no.1 for tracing the accused - respondent no.2, according to us, no interference is warranted in this petition, as the relief, which the petitioner has prayed for in this petition, stands fully granted. In the light of that, the petition is dismissed with no costs. (R.K. Deshpande,J.) (P.V. Hardas, J.) ndk/c67091