IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.W.P. No. 6088 of 2011 Date of decision: August 4, 2011 Beas Dev Chauhan Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge For the Petitioners : Mr. Lakshay Thakur, Advocate. For the State : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. ___________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner claims the benefit of ad hoc service followed by regular service for the purpose of pension and increments. According to the petitioner, the issue is covered in his favour by the judgments of this Court rendered in LPA No.36 of 2010, Sita Ram vs. State and Ravi Kumar vs. State of H.P. and others, CWP No. 4550 of 2010. 2. Learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. Petitioner submits that he would file an appropriate representation furnishing all factual details before the 2 competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for him to do so. 3. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent concerned to examine the matter, after verifying the facts, in the light of the judgments referred to above and take appropriate action thereon within a period of four months from the date of the production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copies of the judgments referred to above. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. ( Justice Kurian Joseph ), Chief Justice August 4, 2011 (K) ( Justice Rajiv Sharma ), Judge