IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-248 of 2010 Date of Decision:12.8.2010 Ishar Chand and others .... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. S.K. Bawa, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to respondent No.2 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners and their family members at the hands of respondents No.4 and 5. Upon notice, reply has been filed by way of affidavit of Harcharan Singh Bhullar, PPS, Sr. Superintendent of Police, Barnala, on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. As per the reply, an FIR No.38 dated 4.8.2009 under Section 420 IPC was registered against petitioners No.1 and 2 and one Ravi Garg son of petitioner No.1. It is further stated that the bail was granted to petitioners No.1 and 2 whereas Ravi Garg son of petitioner No.1 is absconding. Accordingly, the investigating officer visited the house of the petitioner for the arrest of said Ravi Garg. Learned counsel for the State has stated on instructions that the said Ravi Garg has been arrested on 16.6.2010 and challan has also been filed and therefore, there is no further reason to visit the house of the petitioners. In view of the above facts and circumstances, no further order is required to be passed at this stage. Dismissed accordingly. 12.8.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE