1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4280 OF 2009 Mr.Haseen Qureshi & Anr. : Applicants (Orig.Accused Nos.2 & 3) V/s. Mrs.Shamim Munir Hasan Fatta & Anr. : Respondents .... Mr.Meghashyam Kocharekar for the applicants. Mr.Suresh Dubey for respondent no.1. Ms P.P. Bhosale, Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. ..... CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : JANUARY 11, 2010. P.C.: Having heard Mr.Kocharekar on behalf of the applicants at some length, I am not inclined to interfere with the order directing issuance of process against the applicants for offences punishable under sections 143, 147, 341, 342, 427, 452 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code. The argument that the Magistrate ignored the relevant statutory provisions cannot be of any assistance to the applicants. Taking due note of the fact that the complainant even prima facie could not substantiate her allegations that the accused have committed offences punishable under sections 395 and 2 307 of the Indian Penal Code, the learned Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate refused to issue process summoning the accused to answer this charge. He issued the process on the basis of the materials available only insofar as the afore-mentioned provisions of the Indian Penal Code. That he has done by applying the mind to the statements recorded and the report of the investigation ordered earlier. I do not see any legal infirmity, much less any case of abuse of the process of the Court so as to interfere in my inherent jurisdiction. 2. The Criminal Application is dismissed. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)