1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.10561 OF 2004 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.170 OF 2006 Smt. Savita Arun Gaikwad. ...Petitioner. Vs. Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr. A. P. Vanarse for the Petitioner. Mr. M. B. Mehere with Mr. A.H. Gokhale for the Respondents. ..... CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, J. AND DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. January 20, 2006. P.C. Considering that the Petitioner already appeared afresh pursuant to a new advertisement, the Learned Counsel seeks leave to withdraw the petition. The Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The Civil Application is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. We make it clear that if the Petitioner appears for the fresh interview, her case should be considered independently and irrespective of what has been set out in the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, which rejected the case of the Petitioner. 2 With the above observation, the petition along with the applicant stand disposed of. ( F.I. Rebello, J.) (Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)