IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21744 of 2011 Govind Kumar, son of Narendra Kumar, aged about 28 years, resident of village + P.O. Jameera, P.S., District – Bhojpur (Arah) Versus 1. The Union of India through the Director General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force, New Delhi. 2. Director General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force, New Delhi. 3. Inspector General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force, Bihar Sector, Patna. 4. Inspector General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force, Northern Sector, New Delhi. 5. Deputy Inspector General of Police, Group Centre, Central Reserve Police Force, Muzaffarpur. 6. Deputy Inspector General of Police, Group Centre, Central Reserve Police Force, Mokama Ghat, Patna. ---------------------------------- 02. 08.12.2011 The issue raised by the present petitioner seems to be identical with cases of Ramta Singh and others, which is CWJC No.17078 of 2010 decided on 8.10.2010. Question raised is whether the petitioner would be allowed benefit of seniority, back wages etc. including arrears of salary, if any, in the background of a CBI enquiry which was conducted in matter of such selection. Learned counsel representing the Union of India submits that they have no objection if the petitioner moves the DIG, Group Centre, CRPF, Muzaffarpur, lodging his claim in this regard and in terms of the earlier direction contained in Annexure-3, which is the case of Ramta Singh (supra), he will take decision on this count in light of what has already been adjudicated earlier. Writ is disposed of with a direction upon the DIG, 2 CRPF i.e. respondent No.5 that in case petitioner files an application lodging his claim on this score with supporting material, decision on this count will be taken within a period of three months from the date of such filing of an application with a copy of this order. Writ is disposed of with above direction. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)