THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION No.32879 of 2011 ORDER: In this Writ Petition, the petitioner questions the final order dated 12.12.2011 issued by the third respondent directing to close down its business activity. The petitioner, M/s.Maruthi Crafts, is a car repairing shed in the premises bearing A.P.H.B.No.7, street No.2, Baghlingampally, Hyderabad. It claims to be running the repairing shed under a valid trade licence and the said licence was renewed from time to time which is valid upto 31.12.2013. The petitioner states that, pursuant to the show cause notice dated 22.10.2011 issued by the third respondent, W.P.No.28745 of 2011 was filed and, this Court, by order dated 24.10.2011, disposed of the Writ Petition directing the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC) to take action in accordance with law after considering its explanation. The petitioner’s grievance is that, while it has been carrying on its business activity under the valid trade licence, the third respondent has passed the impugned order directing to close down its business forthwith granting two days time to remove the machinery including spray painting machinery, denting machinery and other belongings to make the garages convenient for parking of the vehicles only. Sri V.Raghu, learned Counsel for the petitioner, contended that the premises in question is being used by the petitioner for the purpose for which licence was granted, that the third respondent without any authority passed the impugned order and, therefore, the impugned order is liable to be set aside. Smt Y.Padmavathi, learned Standing Counsel for GHMC, contended that the petitioner has been carrying on the commercial activity in garage Nos.7 and 9 for which no licence was granted, that the said garages are meant for parking of the vehicles of the private parties only and that the impugned order was passed only after affording reasonable opportunity to the petitioner and, therefore, it does not necessitate interference by this Court. It is not in dispute that the petitioner is having a trade licence for running a car repairing shed in premises bearing A.P.H.B.No.7, street No.2, Baghlingampally, Hyderabad. Based on the complaint lodged by the residents of the locality on 21.10.2011, the Municipal authorities issued the show cause notice dated 22.10.2011 cancelling its trade licence and directed to close down its business within three days. Thereafter, the said show cause notice was challenged in W.P.No.28745 of 2011 and this Court, by order dated 24.10.2011, disposed of the Writ Petition directing to take appropriate action in accordance with law after considering the explanation of the petitioner. As seen from the impugned order, the petitioner is said to have been carrying on the servicing centre without a valid trade licence in garage Nos.7 and 9 (which were meant for parking of the vehicles of the residents of HIG Blocks located in the area) and the same has been causing nuisance, air pollution, blockage, congestion of the road and severe health problems to the residents of the locality. It is also evident from the record that the car repairing/servicing is being carried on the footpath causing nuisance and inconvenience to the residents of the locality. In the light of the fact that the petitioner has to remove the machinery including spray painting machinery, denting machinery and other belongings, it would be appropriate that a reasonable time may be granted to make the garages convenient for parking of the vehicles only. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to remove the machinery, including spray painting machinery, denting machinery and other belongings to make garage Nos.7 and 9 available for parking of the vehicles only, by 31.12.2011, failing which, the respondent-authorities shall remove the machinery on or after 01.01.2012 without giving any further notice to the petitioner. It is also made clear that the petitioner shall not carry out any business activity in the premises in question for which there was no trade licence. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. K.C.BHANU, J Dt:14.12.2011 usd