SSK/907 1 RPW 102.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 102 OF 2011 in WRIT PETITION NO. 9897 OF 2010 Smt. Mangala Shantaram Pawar ....Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Shri K. Y. Mandlik, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri K. S. Dewal, Advocate for respondent no.4. Shri P. S. Cardozo, AGP for respondent nos. 1 to 3. Smt. Mangala Shantar Pawar, petitioner is present. Shri Rajendra Tukaram Bidkar, respondent no.4 is present. CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATED : 14th OCTOBER, 2011. P.C.: Heard Mr. Mandlik, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dewal, learned counsel for respondent no.4. 2. Petitioner and respondent no.4 both are present before the Court. Respondent No.4 without going into the merits of the review petition is ready and willing to give an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- to the petitioner over and above an amount of Rs.12,00,000/- agreed to be given to the petitioner under Consent Terms dated 4th May, 2011. The petitioner states that if an SSK/907 2 RPW 102.11 amount of Rs.2,00,000/- over and above an amount of Rs.12,00,000/- is given to her, she would have no grievance against respondent no.4. The statement of the petitioner as well as respondent no.4 is accepted. 3. Respondent no.4 has handed over two demand drafts drawn on Bank of Maharashtra dated 23rd May, 2011 for an amount of Rs.9,00,000/- and Rs.3,00,000/- respectively to the petitioner. Respondent No.4 states that the amount of Rs.2,00,000/- which is to be paid to the petitioner in pursuance of this order, will be paid to her by demand draft on or before 18th October, 2011. The said statement is accepted. 4. Mr. Mandlik, learned counsel for the petitioner also makes a statement that the petitioner will withdraw the proceedings for succession certificate in respect of the suit shop. The statement is accepted. 5. Mr. Dewal, learned counsel for respondent no.4 states that respondent no.4 shall withdraw Contempt Petition No.248 of 2011. The statement is accepted. 6. In view of the above, Mr. Mandlik, learned counsel, states that the petitioner will comply with her part which is required to be performed under Order dated 4th May, 2011 whenever respondent no.4 calls upon her SSK/907 3 RPW 102.11 to do so. Mr. Mandlik, learned counsel, in the above circumstances, seeks leave to withdraw the review petition. Leave as prayed for, is granted. The review petition is disposed of, as withdrawn. (RANJIT MORE, J.)