IN THE HIGH COUR_T OFJUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.N0.6^T9 / 2005 liiiSsjii!.; Petitioner /••^ Smt.Sangita Singh W/o Shri Raj'nish Singh Aged about 34 years, ^*v n^^u. CXUUUL ^>-r yv.eu-o, 9^.^;^fc- ..•• R/o In fronf of Water Tank, r* /^l - J T-i' - ^. -- '^L — 1 ^t —-^ -1 ^ ? ^^L/'...-'e^."...- ^--^ .^-:^^' t^^"" Respondents Govt.Hospital, Gandai, Post Gandai, Tehsil - Chhuikhadan, Dist : Rajnandgaon-(C.G.) Versus :l. ^c<^4. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, Janpad Panchayat Chhuhikhadan Through its Chief Executive Officer, Dist : Rajnandgaon- The Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Chhuhikhadan Dist : Rajnandgaon-(C.G.) Block Education Officer Chhuhikhadan, Dist: Rajnandgaon-(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTI.ON OF INDIA ^r • •u^kier? ; W.P. N0. 6479/2005 RESPONDENTS Versus Sinf. Saagita Singh State ofC.G. 8s Others |i!:l WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLB 32S/J227 OF THB CONSTITUTIOS OF INDIA Appearaace: Shri Rajnish Siagh Baghel, coujisel for fhe petitioner. Slrri Yashwaat Singh TUakur, Dy. A.G. wifh Smt. Smita Ghai, P.L. for fhe State. QRALORDER (10.07.2009) • Wtffa flie consent of the parties, fhe niatter is heard finally. ChaUenge ia fhe iastant petition is to the oider dated 4.7.2005 (Atinexure P/4) by which the petitioner who is worknig as Shiksha Karmi Grade III has been transferred froia Govt. Primary School, Kopebhata to Govt. Primary School, Parsatola by respondent No,3. Thereafter v-ide order dated 25.11.2005 (Annexure P/6), fhe petitioner was relieved to joia at Govt. Piimary SchooL Parsatola, Chlimkhadau. Tbis petition was ffled oa 22.12.2005 aud fhe stay was granted in favour of fhe petitioner vide order dated 5.1.2006. Contention of counsel for fhe pardes is fhat fhis Cpi.ut inay quash ttie impugned transfer order by giyiiig liberty to •'•^. ftie respondents to pass fresh order if admiuistrative exigency so warraats, In view- of fhe subiiussiou.s of the oouasel for the respetftive parties aad looking to fhe fact fhat fhe petition was filed on 22.12.2005 aad stay was granted iu favour of the petitioner vide order dated 5.1.2006, the mipugned ordersdated 4.7.2005 & 25.11.2005, so far as it relates to the petitioner are hereby quashed, However, tiie respondents sbaU. be free to pass fhe order afresh if adraiuistrative exigency necessitates ftie sanie. Wifh. fhe aforesaid observati.cn, the petition stauds disposed of. • . y • \.. ^ ] Pritinker Diwaker Judge i ^