H!GHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARH:BILASPUR SingleBench: Appellants Piaintlffs lil/ il--^ Hon'bie Shri Diiip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. Second Appeal No. 91/2008 1. Jagdish, aiged about 44 years, son of Heeradas 2. Banke, aged about 36 years son of Heeradas 3. Gore, aged about 33 years son of Heeradas i 4. Jawahar, aged abouf 28 years, son of Heeradas i 5. Dalung, aged about 56 years, son of BaSsram : 6. Sagun, aged about 46 years, son of Batjram 7. Jhadiram, aged about 55 years, son ofBaliram ' i ,8. Fooibai, aged about 55 years, D/o Raruha; A!i caste Satnami, resident of village Motimpur, P.H.j No.30, Tahsil Nungeli, District Biiaspur (CG) 9. Fuimatibai D/o Ljate Raruha, aged about 53 years, Wife Anjorcfas Sanami, resident bf Piparhata, Tahsi! Takhatpur, District; Biiaspur (CG) 10. Gangabai D/o Heeradas Satnami, resident of Motimpur, Tahsil Mungeli, DlstnctBi!aspur(CG) Versus 1. Ratanbai D/o Bajeial, aged about 31 years, ressdent of i viliage Totakapa, Tahsil Mungeli, presentfy residing at Takhatpur, Bazarpara, District Biiaspur(CG) 2. State of Chhattisgarh, through: The Coilector, Bilaspur(CG) The second appeai aaainst the aDDellate iudament and decree under Sectloh 100 of C.P.C. Present: None for the parties. ORALORDER (Passed on 12.03.2Q08) Respondents Defendahts i^ s&^ i.i^&ti.fiiSiiid^ .^.,.t- ^^*.-..^-.-. ^ None appears for the appellants when the matter Was callecl. On the last date of hearing atso, the matter was passed over as no one had appeared for the appeiiants. (2) Since none appeared for the appellants and no representation was made ontheir behaif, this appeai is dismissed in default of the appellants. Sd/- DilipRaosaheb Deshmukh Judge ftr <, ^M