IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11316 of 2005 SMT.LAKHMANI DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 06.05.2010 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. Vijay Bharti, learned A.C. to S.C.10 for the State and Mr. Ranjan Kumar, appears on behalf of Mr. J.P. Karn, counsel representing the Accountant General are present. A counter affidavit has been filed in the present case, copy whereof was served on learned counsel for the petitioner on 5.5.2010 in which a categorical statement has been made in paragraph 5 of the counter affidavit that all the retiral benefits admissible to the petitioner such as pension, gratuity, leave encashment, group insurance, balance of G.P.F. dues, suspense account and differential salary amount including the salary in the strike period has granted to the petitioner. Relevant enclosures in support of the statement have been annexed as Annexure-A series. It is further stated that if the petitioner yet feels aggrieved by any of the calculations he can represent before the authority concerned and - 2 - which would be considered in accordance with law. Having regard to the statement made in paragraph 5 and paragraph 7 of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the District Superintendent of Education, Munger, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to petitioner to represent, if she feels aggrieved by any of the calculations of the amount paid to her by way of retiral benefits, before the authority concerned and who shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law. Bibhash (Jyoti Saran, J.)