IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.9683 of 2011 Date of Decision : May 30, 2011. Narinder Mohan and others .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.G.P.Vashisht, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners seek a mandamus to direct the respondents to grant them the same benefits as have been granted to the petitioners in Civil Writ Petition No.16380 of 1989 (Balbir Singh and others versus State of Punjab and others) decided on 7.5.2009 (Annexure P-13) and Civil Writ Petition No.5629 of 2011 (Amarjit Kaur and others versus State of Punjab and others) decided on 30.3.2011 (Annexure P-14). It appears that the petitioners have approached this Court without first approaching the authorities for the aforesaid relief. In these circumstances, however, without expressing any views on the petitioners' entitlement, I deem it appropriate to dispose of CWP No.9683 of 2011 [2] this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to treat this writ petition as a representation on behalf of the petitioners and dispose of their claim in the light of the aforesaid decisions of this Court in Balbir Singh's case and Amarjit Kaur's case (supra), within a period of four months from the date of received a certified copy of this order. The petitioners are directed to send a copy of this writ petition to the respondents alongwith the certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. May 30, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE