1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1884 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 369 OF 2010 Sau Rajni Madhukar Saner .. Applicant Versus Shaikh Yakub Shaikh Amir and others .. Respondents Miss Surekha Mahajan, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri A. N. Nagargoje, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 24TH SEPTEMBER, 2010. PER COURT : . This is an application for stay to the order passed by the Trial Court, so also seeking injunction restraining the respondent Nos. 1 to 4 from alienating or creating third party interest in the suit property gat No. 377/1. The present applicant is the original plaintiff. The suit has been dismissed. There is no executable decree. As such, the prayer clause "B" cannot be 2 granted. As far as prayer clause "C" is concerned, the applicant admits that the respondents have share in the property and that applicant has 1/3rd share. In view of that the respondents are restrained from alienating, creating third party interest or changing the nature of the suit property gat No. 377 to the extent of 1/3rd share of applicant. The civil application is accordingly disposed of. [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] bsb/Sept. 10