1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5612 OF 2005 1. Shaikh Jameel Shaikh Hyder and others .. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Milind Patil, Advocate for the Petitioners. Shri S. K. Tambe, A. G. P. for the Respondents Nos. 1 to 3. Shri S. M. Godsaey, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 15TH JULY, 2009. ORAL ORDER [ Per Naresh H. Patil, J] : 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner Shri Patil submits that there are certain irregularities committed by the District Wakf Officer. In the submission learned counsel Shri Patil points out that a scheme is required to be framed. 2 2. Shri Godsay, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 4 submits that the respondent No. 4 would take appropriate steps whenever illegalities are noticed. 3. In case petitioner desires, the petitioner is entitled to file comprehensive petition/representation before the respondent No. 4 for redressal of grievances including prayer for framing a scheme. If such an application is filed, the respondent No. 4 would pass appropriate orders on such application in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. Petition is disposed of. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] bsb/July 09