IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- FAO No. 1653 of 2007 Date of decision: September 25, 2009 M/s Ashoka Industries and others Jalalabad ........ Appellants Versus Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Puneet Jindal, Advocate for the appellants Mr. G S Sandhawalia, Advocate for the respondent-PUNSUP Mr. C S Bakshi, Advocate for respondent No. 2 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. For orders, see FAO No. 4034 of 2007 titled as 'M/S G M Rice Mills and others v. Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. (PUNSUP) and another', decided on 25.09.2009. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge September 25, 2009 mohan IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- FAO No. 1654 of 2007 Date of decision: September 25, 2009 M/s Dashmesh Rice Mills Jalalabad ........ Appellant Versus Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Puneet Jindal, Advocate for the appellants Mr. G S Sandhawalia, Advocate for the respondent-PUNSUP Mr. C S Bakshi, Advocate for respondent No. 2 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. For orders, see FAO No. 4034 of 2007 titled as 'M/S G M Rice Mills and others v. Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. (PUNSUP) and another', decided on 25.09.2009. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge September 25, 2009 mohan IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- FAO No. 4801 of 2007 Date of decision: September 25, 2009 M/s Jagtar Singh Prabh Dyal ........ Appellant Versus Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Puneet Jindal, Advocate for the appellants Mr. G S Sandhawalia, Advocate for the respondent-PUNSUP Mr. C S Bakshi, Advocate for respondent No. 2 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. For orders, see FAO No. 4034 of 2007 titled as 'M/S G M Rice Mills and others v. Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. (PUNSUP) and another', decided on 25.09.2009. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge September 25, 2009 mohan IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- FAO No. 1653 of 2007 Date of decision: September 25, 2009 M/s Ashoka Industries and others Jalalabad ........ Appellants Versus Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Puneet Jindal, Advocate for the appellants Mr. G S Sandhawalia, Advocate for the respondent-PUNSUP Mr. C S Bakshi, Advocate for respondent No. 3 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. For orders, see FAO No. 4034 of 2007 titled as 'M/S G M Rice Mills and others v. Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. (PUNSUP) and another', decided on 25.09.2009. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge September 25, 2009 mohan