IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 27TH MAY 2011 / 6TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 13561 of 2011(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- URMILA,(ROLL NO.4117065/96 AISSE), HOUSE NO.24,TAJPUR VILLAGE,PIN:275101,NAMDAND.P.O, MADHUBAN TALUK,MAU DISTRICT,UTHARA PRADESH. BY ADV. SRI.K.G.NARAYANAN NAIR RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE PRINCIPAL,JAWAHAR NAVODAYA VIDYALAYA CHENNITHALA.P.O,ALAPPUZHA. 2. THE REGIONAL OFFICER,CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION,NO.3,J.BLOCK,16TH MAIN ROAD, ANNA NAGAR(WEST),CHENNAI-600040. SC FOR CBSE – SRI.DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN SC FOR R1- SRI.P.K.VIJAYA MOHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J -------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.13561 OF 2011 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of May 2011 JUDGMENT The grievance of the petitioner is that,her name has been wrongly entered in the mark sheet and pass certificate issued by the C.B.S.E, which is sought to be corrected. . 2. The actual name of the petitioner is stated as 'Urmila' whereas the same has been wrongly entered in the mark sheet and pass certificate as 'Urmila Singh'. On coming across the mistake as above, the petitioner sought to have the same corrected, by filing necessary application before the C.B.S.E, producing copies of the relevant records. Reliance is sought to be placed on Exts. P2, P3, P4 and P5, which are copies of the transfer certificate issued from Government Primary School, Admission form to Std.VI , Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Mau, U.P, Scholars Register maintained by Jawahar Navodaya Vidhyalaya, Mau, U.P and list of candidates submitted from Jawahar Navodaya Vidhyalaya, Chennithala. 3. The case of the petitioner is that, Ext. P7 application preferred by the petitioner through the school authorities has been simply rejected by the second respondent vide Ext. P10. The prayer in the Writ Petition is to give appropriate direction to the respondents to redress the grievance. 4. Heard the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents as well. W.P.(C) No.13561/2011 2 5. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court finds that, the name of the petitioner is liable to be corrected in the mark list and pass certificate, in the light of the records as mentioned hereinbefore. The mistake admittedly occurred at the hands of the 1st respondent in filling up the Registration form, as conceded in ExtP8,requesting the 2nd respondent to effect necessary correction; which however has not been properly adverted to by the 2nd respondent while turning down the request vide Ext.P10. 6. In the above facts and circumstances, Ext.P10 is set aside. The 2nd respondent is directed to effect necessary correction of name in the mark list and certificate of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months, from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment. The 2nd respondent can seek to surrender the original Mark list and certificate containing the defective name, if necessary. The Writ Petition is disposed of. vdv P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE