^'^^^?^ys^'^'^-^^^^-;'^?*^;%^:?^^^ 3 ..V" n " XH THE HIGH COURT OF H2U3HYA PRABSSH &T JABSIiPHR W.P. N0.c| L) °j o£ 1995 Petitioners Respondents: ^'.•' ^ ^*"'. '^ /• Rajendra Kumar Jalswal S/o Shri Kandlal .3'alswal Aged about 52 years . R/o 1555 Wrlght Town, ^ 3'abalpur, M.P. Versas 1. State Consumer Disputes Redressal CoOTnission, '- Throagh its Registrar, 24, Zone I, Maharana Pratap Nagar, B'aopal, H.P. 2. District Consamer Bisputes Redressal Forun, Ralpur, District Ralpar. M.P. S>3. Anupam sahakari Srih N.i.rman Samiti Maryadlt, Balpur, Through its President, - 50 vlvekanand Nagar, Raipur, M.P. ¥iRIT PBTITION UNDBR ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA -lli-?^ \ 'v:sr . 'S.'A //^''. 'Y^ ?! E-u < saal:Si,,f,,, . ies5i HE^ ('""' "yf^ &, ^' z. h o ^ MIGH COURT OF CHHATTISG^'UUH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETmON No. 949 of 1995 Rajendra Kumar Jaiswal VERSUS State Consumer Disputes Redressal Coirimission & Otfiers WRIT PETLTION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrTLTION OF INDIA Present: None forAe petitioner. 3. (Passed on 18m dayof Oetober, 2010) The matter is called for hearing. None appears nor is any represeiitation made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. In view ofthe above, the matter.is dismissed for want of prosecution. Registn' is directed to send a coov 'of this order to the petitioner, forthvvith. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihoiri Judge ijOirn '^.