IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 8TH JANUARY 2008 / 18TH POUSHA 1929 WA.No. 25 of 2008 ------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.34549/2007 Dated 30/11/2007 .................... APPELLANT/PETITIONER: ------------------------------------ SMT. LAKSHMIKUTTY NARAYANAN, CHAKKUTHODIYIL HOUSE, PERINGAVU P.O., THRISSUR-680 018. BY ADV. SRI.DENIZEN KOMATH RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: --------------------------------------------- 1. THE TAHSILDAR, THRISSUR. 2. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR(REVENUE RECOVERY), THRISSUR. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. BY SPL. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. VINOD CHANDRAN. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L. DATTU, CJ. & K.M. JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WRIT APPEAL No.25 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 8th day of January, 2008. JUDGMENT H.L.DATTU, CJ, The only prayer that the petitioner sought in the writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution was to direct the first respondent in the writ petition to comply with the orders and directions issued by this court in O.P.12261 of 2001 dated 6th June, 2006. The consequential prayer that was made was to direct respondents 1 and 2 to serve a copy of the order said to have been passed subsequent to the hearing conducted on Ext.P3 notice based on Ext.P1 judgment within a time frame. 2. When the matter was posted before the court, we had directed Sri.Vinod Chandran, learned Government Advocate to take notice for the respondents and to get instructions as to whether the first respondent has complied with the orders and directions issued by this court. 3. On instructions, the learned Government Advocate submits that the first respondent has not passed any order pursuant to the directions issued by this court and further requests us to grant them two months time from today to comply with the orders and directions issued by this court. 4. The request of the learned Government Advocate appears to be reasonable and if it is granted, it will not cause any prejudice to the appellant. Accordingly, we dispose of the writ appeal as under: Order (i) The order passed by the learned Single Judge is set aside. WA. 25 of 2008. 2 (ii) There will be a direction to the first respondent to comply with the orders and directions issued in O.P.12261 of 2001 within two months time from today. (iii) After passing the order as directed by this court, respondent No.1 is directed to serve a copy of the order to the petitioner. Ordered accordingly. H.L. DATTU, CHIEF JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE sb.