IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO : 5976 of 2009 Between: 1 Peetha Venkateswara Raju, S/o. Narasimha Raju R/o. Halia Village Anumula Mandal, Nalgonda District. 2 Peetha Srinivasa raju, S/o. Narasimha Raju R/o. Ibrahimpatnam, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 3 Peetha Padma, W/o. Venkateswara Raju, R/o. Halia, Anumanala Mandal, Nalngonda Districdt. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The State of A.P., rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad, through SHO P.S.,Alwal (Halia) Nalgonda District. 2 Peetha Narasimha Raju, S/o. Peetha Venkata Chalama Raju, R/o. Halia Village, Anumala Mandal, Nalgonda District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Section ____ of Crl.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased toto quash the proceedigns in Crime nO.160 of 2009 on the file of the Station House Officer, Alwal (Halia) Police Station, Anumula Mandal, nalgonda District The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.SANKU & KAVITI MURLI KRISNA, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent. CRIMINAL PETITION NO : 5977 of 2009 Between: 1 Peetha Venkateswara Raju, S/o. Narasimha Raju, R/o. Halia Village Anumula Mandal, Nalgond District. 2 Peetha Srinivasa Raju, S/o. Narasimha Raju, R/o. Ibrahimpatnam Vijayawada , Krishna District. 3 Peetha Padma, W/o. Venkateswara Raju, R/o. Halia, Anumnala Mandal, Nalgonda District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The State of A.P., rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad, through SHO P.S., Alwal (Halia) Nalgonda District. 2 Peetha Narasimha RAju, S/o. Peetha Venkata Chalama Raju, R/o. Halia Village, Anumala Mandal, Nalgonda District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Section ____ of Crl.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased toto quash the proceedigns in Crime nO.164 of 2009 on the file of the Station House Officer, Alwal (Halia) Police Station, Anumula Mandal, nalgonda District The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.SANKU & KAVITI MURLI KRISNA, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent. The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY Crl.P.Nos. 5976 and 5977 of 2009 Common Order: As the petitioners and the de facto complainant in both the petitions are one and the same and are inter related, both the petitions are heard together and being disposed of by this common order. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners; Mrs. K. Sesharajyam, learned counsel appearing for the second respondent and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. In the circumstances of the case, it is directed that the investigation into both the cases and the consequential proceedings based on the result of the investigation shall go on. However, the petitioners, in both the cases, shall not be arrested till filing of the charge sheet if any. 4. With the directions as above, the both the petitions are disposed of. _______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. November 18, 2009. *BVS _______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. November 13, 2009. *BVS