IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 6TH APRIL 2010 / 16TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 10894 of 2010(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- REETHAMA JOSEPH,AGED 54, W/O.IVACHAN T.JAMES, PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING SUPERVISOR, COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTRE, MUKKOM, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW KURIAKOSE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOF OF HEALTH SERVICES(FW), DIRECTORATE OF HEALTH SERVICES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER, HEALTH, CALICUT. 4. AJITHAKUMARY M.P,PUBLIC HELTH NURSING SUPERVISOR, COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTRE, BALUSSERY, KOZHIKODE. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.ANTONY MUKKATH FOR R1 TO 3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 10894 of 2010 ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 6th day of April, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is working as a Public Health Nursing Supervisor. Feeling aggrieved by Ext.P4 draft transfer list, the petitioner has submitted Ext.P5 objection. The apprehension of the petitioner is that the respondents would finalise Ext.P4 without considering Ext.P5. A perusal of Ext.P4 would reveal that the respondents themselves invited for objections from aggrieved employees. Therefore, there cannot be any reason for such apprehension. However, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 before finalising Ext.P4, in case it is not already finalised. Sd/- (C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge