IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.19287 of 2010 NAJBUM, WIFE OF LATE MD. SADIQUE ANSARI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RAJANDIH, P.S. NASARIGANJ, DISTRICT- ROHTAS AT SASARAM. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, ROHTAS AT SASARAM, DISTRICT- ROHTAS AT SASARAM. 3. THE TREASURY OFFICER, ROHTAS AT SASARAM, DISTRICT- ROHTAS AT SASARAM. 4. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA. 2 25.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent State as also the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is for revision of family pension which has not been done, despite representation as contained in Annexure-2. Learned counsel for the State submits that the grievances of the petitioner would be considered as per law without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 2 with a copy to respondent nos. 3 and 4 In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims, the above respondent shall consider the representation of the petitioner for revision of family pension in accordance - 2 - with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled without delay and admitted dues may also be paid along with statutory interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Amrendra/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.),