1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application No.2017 of 2009 In Writ Petition No.4294 of 2008 (Baldeosingh Rathod Shikshan Prasarak Sanstha and another v. Chandan Namdeo Dukare and others) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri T.R. Kankale, AGP for Applicant/R- 3. Shri C.A. Joshi, Advocate for Petitioners. Shri D.P. Dapurkar, Advocate for R- 1. Coram : R.C. Chavan, J. Dated : 14 th September, 2009 The learned counsel for respondent No.1 states that at the instance of the petitioners, respondent No.3 had adjourned the matter to 17-9-2009. He states that his client has already filed the written notes of arguments. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that he has no information. However, he states that he will instruct the local counsel to get the matter heard on 17-9-2009 and see that no further adjournments are sought. Respondent No.3 may not grant 2 adjournments to the petitioners and complete the hearing and decide the matter by 30-9-2009. The application is disposed of accordingly. Judge. pdl