IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8530 of 2009 ARUN KUMAR SINHA, SON OF LATE JAI NANDAN SINHA, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA KASHIPUR, WARD NO. 11, WITHIN SAMASTIPUR MUNICIPAL AREA, POLICE STATION SAMASTIPUR (T) DISTRICT - SAMASTIPUR Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE-CUM-DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER, SAMASTIPUR. 2. THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER, SAMASTIPUR. 3. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, FLOOD CONTROL, SAMASPTIPUR. 5. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA THROUGH G.M. BIHAR CIRCLE, PATNA. 6. BRANCH MANAGER, S.B.I. BAZAR BRANCH, SAMASTIPUR. 7. TREASURY OFFICER, SAMASTIPUR TREASURY SAMASTIPUR. ----------- 3. 06.08.2009 A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent – Bank. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, respondent – Bank, State and also the Accountant General. It is submitted on behalf of the respondent – Bank that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed as stated in the counter affidavit. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the statement made in the counter affidavit, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. As such he is not pressing this application. 2 However, he seeks opportunity to represent before the competent authority/Accountant General, if any of the claims have been still un-redressed. Accordingly, the writ application is disposed of with the above observations that if any of the claims still un-redressed, petitioner will be at liberty to represent before the competent authority including the Accountant General. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)