i^. \s, HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR .. '•. Writ Pstltaon'fS) No. 1254 of 2009 Petitloner Dr. Dadu Ram.Raj, aged about54 years, s/o. Late V.R. Raj, Medicai Offlcer, Community Heaith Centre, Kartala, District Korba(CG). Respondents Versys 1. The State of Chhattlsgarh, through the Secretary,, Department of yedicai and Health, D.K.S. Bhawan,Raipur (CG). 2. The Chief Medicai and Health Officer, Korba, Dlstrjct Korba (CG). 3. The Biock Medical Officer, Community Health Centre, Kartaia, Dlstrict Korba (CG). (Writ Petitlon under Artlcie 226 ofthe Constltution of India) SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K.Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri MalayKumar Bhaduri, counsei for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate forthe State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 4^h day of SViarch2008) By this petition, the petitioner Impugns the transfer order dated 2-1 -2009 (Annexure P/1) passed by the respondent No.2,whereby- the petltioner has been transferred from Community Health Centre, Karlala to Primary Health Centre, Pasan, Biock Development, Podiuproda, Dlst. Korba. 2) -Mr. Bhaduri, iearned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that •tho-ugh on the face of it, it appears to be a transfer order, b.ut it is an attachment. 3) On the other hand. IVIr. Bhatia, learned Deputy Govt. Advocate appearing for the State submits that It is not the order of attachment, but it is a sinnple. fransfer order from one place to another piace.. 4) Havlng heard leamed coun'sel for the petitioner and perused the pleadings and documents, I do not find that there is any complaln of maia fide, -^; ^- iack o? competence o? the offlcer passing the order orviolation of the statutory rules and regulations. 5) It is well settled princlple of law that transfer is apa incldent of service and it is for the employer to dedde asto whether a particular officer/empioyee be posted keeplng in view publlc Interest as well as administratlve exlgency. This Court has limited jurisdlctjon to interfere in the transfer rnatter and this Court can interfere oniy in the case of proved mala flde, non-competence of authority passing the transfer order and transfer order not being in conformity v^ith the rules and regulatlons, The petitioner/employee cannotbe permitt.ed to remain at one place, forever, by Court orders. . • • .6) , In vlew of the foregoing, thls petition'is devoid of merit and deserves to be dismissed. Accordingiy, the.petltlon Is dlsniissed. Consequently, 1A.No,1 also stands disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri | Judge ^'.^: