1 pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 655 OF 2006 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.912 OF 2005 Shamshoddin B. Bagwan ..Applicant versus The Commissioner, Sangli Miraj & Kupwad City Corporation & Others ..Respondents Ms.Deepti Patil i/b. Mr.A.A.Garge for the applicant Mr.Vishwajit Sawant for the respondent Corporation None for the respondent No.2 CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 24th JUNE, 2009. P.C: 1. By this application the applicant wants that there should be no interference so far as enjoyment of property, namely vacant land, more particularly set out in prayer clause (a) with reference to causing disturbance or discontinuance 2 in water and electric supply to the suit premises. Record show that by ad-interim order dated 12.4.2006 the notice dated 22.9.1989 was not to be acted upon. No affidavit in reply is filed by the Corporation-respondent No.1 as well as respondent No.2. 2. Second appeal is filed by the applicant himself. In my view, the order which has remained in force for last more than three years can be conveniently continued till disposal of the second appeal. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that notice dated 22.9.1989 shall not be acted upon till disposal of second appeal. 3. Learned Advocate Mr.Sawant appearing on behalf of the Corporation submitted that if the Corporation wants to rehabilitate the appellant in the scheme drafted by the Corporation, the Corporation be permitted to do so. Since the Corporation has exhibited its mind to rehabilitate the appellant, if the scheme so permits, it will be open for the 3 corporation to rehabilitate the appellant. In case the Corporation wants to rehabilitate the appellant they are free to move this Court for obtaining appropriate order. 4. Civil application disposed of with no order as to costs. (R.Y.Ganoo, J.)