HIGH mug; OF GagA, wgggRH: BlLAsPuR Wm Petition (S) go: 1w fr 8; J l l ! ‘ ‘ i , ‘ etite r . ibrar Miya lraqu‘ Slo Late Addul Jabbar aged ; . , g i l l about 51 ye rs working as Accauntant DIVIsianal ForestOfFcer South Surguja DIVIsnon . Amblkapur Distt Surgu1a (CG) Versu$ - . ‘ ‘ ‘ By this petition the petitioner Impugns the order dated 81%2007 (Annexure‘ Q Pl‘t) whereby the petitioner has been transferred from South Forest Crrcle Surgute to the ofr'tce of Conservator of Forest, Bitaspuro The petitioner had tiled earlier V also petition being Writ Petition (S) Nor 894 of ?008 taking the plea that in the order t dated 244 —2008 for'reiieving him from the post, his name waswrongly typed by , v corrigendum dated 23124—1 $3087: The order was supplied which was meant for l. Mas ’_ v lraqui, Grade ll In stead in the name of l.M. lraqui, Aocoun'tant. The order supplied t ,to him was in the name OHM. iraqui Grade ll This Court after having considered ‘I s this aspeot of the matter observed that the State/respondents shall communicate the J correct transfer order by making necessary amendment in the order it was further ‘ P ‘Respéndents 1} State of Chhattiisgarh through the Secretary,‘ ‘ 3 Department of Forest DKS Bhawan Raipur - \CG) o ,2) , The Principle Chtef Conservatorof Forest Raupur v ' (CG) ' V V . 3) The Conservator of Forest Surguja Circle Ambrkapur Drstt Surguja (CG) 4) ,The Dwrsronal Forest Offlcer O/o Divisional l; Forest Office South Surguja Drvrsron . ' Ambrkapur Drstt SurguJa (CG) 5) Shn Munsm KUJur S/o Not known to petrtroner *’ _ - v aged notknown to petmoner— years workmg as n—oharge JFMIFDA Drvrsronal Forest Omoef South Surguja DIVIsron Amblkapur Diettg i; SurgLrja(CG) - ‘ (WritPetition under Article 226 of the constitmton of Indie) » seman’bIeMr. Sausn K.Agnitrom;.i. I I t Present: r “ v Shrl NN Roy, counselforthe petitioner Shrr Satrsh Gupta Govt Advocate forthe State ORAL ORDER (Passed’on 36-2008) 1 J ‘ \ ‘ ‘ obsérvedithat in the event there is a transfer arder, the same may be given effect to as there iis he chailenge to the transfer order. i 2) :T;he petitioner is now challengrng the order dated 31 -8-2007. Once it has been ordered that if there is any transfer order, the same may be given effect to, the . challengé to the same transferorder dated 31 84807 which was in'question in the petition disposed ofv by the order dated 11-2-2008 by this Court, the present} petition eannot be entertained, it may be either a case? of suppression of facts or’an" attempt by the petitioner to get thermatter heard again: in both cases, this petition- i is not maintainabie. ”it 3) .‘Apcordingty, the petition is dismissed. / i. 3.. Judge Au i ‘ Satish K.Agnit\otr1 r i u‘ . ,- Raj.