IN THE HON'BLE HMH COURTOF CMHATTrS6ARH AT BILASPURfC.G.y •^s^prt**^-- ,Seee(W(-/\ppeal No. \.^2- of 2011 APPELLANTS/ Defendants no^Jl befendants no. 7 ^^^ ^^"^..•o.' ^'^•'"^'y' ~ ^ aritsno. 8 RESPON&ENTS/ Plaintiffs befendants ;1. Ramayan Prasad Gupta, aged about 41 yeqrs, S/o Shri Manharananya Lal 6upta, R/o Village-Baloda, Tahsil- Baloda, District'-Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 2- Smt. Prabha Shrivas, W/o Shri Arun Shrivas, aged about 45 years, R/o Village-6ataura, at present Near N.T.P.C., Seepat, Tahsil-Masturi, DiStrict-Bilaspur (C.6.) 3. Aj"un Shrivas, S/o Shri Muniram Shrivas, aged about 40 years, R/o Viltage-6atayra, at present Near N.T.P.C., Seepat, Tahsil-Masturi, DistrJct-Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS :1. Ramkali Bai, aged about 70 years, W/o Shri Dwarika Prasad Gupta, R/o Village-fiudi, Tahsil-Masturi, District-Bilaspur (C.6.) 2. &eeta Bai, aged about 65 years, W/6 Shri Parasram Gupta, R/o Imlipara, Bilaspur, District-Bilaspur (C.6.) :3. Lekhrom Sahu, Advocate.S/o Shri Ashok Kumar Sahu, R/o Jarve, Tahsil-Janjgir, Djstrict-Janjgir- Chdmpa(C.6.) : 4. Prcrnod Singh, Advocdte, S/o Shri Lakhan, R/o Javalpur, Tahsjl- Janjgir, District-Janjgir-Chdmpa (C.6.) K ^- •T---V 5. Smt. Seeta Bai 6upta, aged about 62 years, W/o Shri Manharan Lal, R/o Baloda, Tahsil-Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.6.) 6; Rajendra 6upta, S/o Shri Laxmi Prasad Gupta, Additional Tahsildar; Seepat, District-JanJgir-Champa (C.6.) at present Tahsildar, Korba, District-Korba (C.G.) 7. State 6f Chhattisgarh, through the Collector, Bilaspur, District-Bilaspur (C-G-) : W'^!w^^-_ ___ ^(rf4&v43<'>i(Ku)_ SE€GNe-APPEALUNbER.t^- OF THE C06E OF CTVIL PROCEDURE 1908 ^^ :l-1- Xl-HC-22 'FSl •^MWV, ^Ttl'y'16. l°«tl'M3,< __M{i>fL<)J°^^J ^ 111^11 «>Hi<:h^^'^^]'jl/^FI, 200 fe^il' 311^1^1 'tegTaiilS) sh*fi':h ^tl^a L^> Sahu M.' ffl^iTOiraTato I.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K._AAsnraI J6.04.2011 Shri Ratnesh Kumar Ag|rawal, Advocate tbr fhe )peUants. Shri Vinod Tekem, Panel Lav^yer for the State. apprc(pnate Leamed counsel appearin^ istructions, seeks permlssion of| )peal wifh liberty to avail ratlable to him under fhe provisio|ns Prayer is allowed. Consequenfly, the appeal i|s wl i|s dismissed as withdrawn ith fhe above stated Uberly. No ojrder asto costs. (he certified copy of the fuijnishing authenttcated true Registry is directed to ipugned order on counsel's retuitn ^)py of ftie same. <^l^<11Aft'fl iTPR^f ^ "f^Zt •<.P*1^1< ^aiPgH ail^i for the appeUants, on thls court to withdraw this reniedy fhat may be oflaw. Sd/- N.K. Agraw^ Judge [1ifryT '^^.