1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICMTURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. LPA No. 171 of 2007 Sanjay v. M.C., Wani Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr D.C.R. Mishra, Adv for appellant. Coram: A.P. Deshpande and R.C. Chavan, JJ Dated : 8th January 2008 A judgment and order passed by the learned single Judge of this Cout partly allowing the writ petition preferred by Municipal Council is challenged by filing the present Letters Patent Appeal. The appellant moved the Labour Court by making grievance that the respondent Municipal Council had indulged into unfair labour practice by terminating his service. The Labour Court allowed the complaint and directed reinstatement of appellant with continuity in service together with full back- wages. The period in relation to which back-wages have been granted is from 31.7.1997 to 11.10.1999. The Industrial Court, on revision by the respondent Municipal Council, maintained the said order passed 2 by the Labour Court and aggrieved thereby the respondent Municipal Council preferred writ petition. The learned single Judge observed that similarly situated employee was granted reinstatement with continuity of service. The learned single Judge has also observed that the present appellant has failed to make out the case that during the said period he was not gainfully employed and hence, though confirmed the order granting reinstatement with continuity in service, has set aside the order granting back-wages. Perused the impugned judgment and order. The same does not call for any interference for the reason that the appellant has failed to establish that during the relevant period he was not gainfully employed coupled with the fact that he has not worked during the said period. Letters Patent Appeal is summarily dismissed. Judge. Judge. hsj