IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.91 OF 2009 Pimpripada Raswhta Bachao Kriti Samiti (PROP) ... Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and others. ... Respondents None for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Saluja, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1,2 and 5. Ms. V.S. Gharapure for respondent Nos.3 and 4. Mr. S.A. Sawant for respondent No.6. CORAM : ANIL R. DAVE, CHIEF JUSTICE & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 8TH APRIL, 2010 P.C. This is a PIL wherein it has been alleged that respondent No.6 is likely to put up construction without taking any permission from respondent Nos. 3 and 4 and that too on a public street. 2. In pursuance of the notice issued by this court, respondent No.6 has appeared and it has been submitted that the construction is not to be put up on a public street and necessary permission like I.O.D. has been received by respondent No.6 from respondent No.3. 3 It would be open to respondent Nos.3 and 4 to take appropriate action in accordance with law against respondent No.6 if the aforestated statement is not correct. 4. In view of the above fact, we do not find any substance in this petition and the same is rejected. No order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.