IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.19807 of 2010 DR. ZAHIR-UL ISLAM & ORS . Versus MD. FAIYAZ ALAM & ORS . ----------- 4. 24.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 19.11.2009 rejecting his application under Order 6 Rule 17. The order impugned is well-considered and reasoned noticing the vacillating stand of the petitioner in first admitting facts, then seeking their deletion and then again seeking their reiteration. This Court finds no infirmity in the impugned order calling for interference. The application is dismissed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)