THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.23581 of 2009 DATED: 03.11.2009 Between: Smt.Narsamma .. Petitioner. And The Govt. of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by Revenue Divisional Officer, Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy District and others. .. Respondents. ORDER: Heard the learned counsel on either side. According to the petitioner, she is the owner of the land admeasuring Ac.3-18 gts. in Sy.No.97 situated at Gouthapur village, Tandur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, having acquired the same by virtue of succession, and pattadar passbook and title deeds, in respect of the said land, were also issued in her favour. While so, it appears that one Abdul Khader, the 5th respondent herein, claiming to have purchased the land to an extent of 241 sq. yards out of the subject land from one Hanumaiah, who in turn purported to have purchased the same from the petitioner, filed a petition before the 1st respondent, namely, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Vikarabad Division, Ranga Reddy District, requesting to delete the subject land from the Pattadar passbooks and title deeds held by the petitioner, for the reason that the subject land is not fit for agriculture and the same is being occupied by the villagers by constructing houses over it. Thereupon, the 1st respondent called for a report from the 3rd respondent-Tahsildar, Tandur Mandal, and basing on the report dated 25.07.2008 submitted by the 3rd respondent, recommending for deletion of the subject land from the pattadar passbook and title deeds held by the petitioner, the 1st respondent issued the impugned proceedings dated 07.08.2008, according permission for deletion of the subject land from the passbooks and title deeds of the petitioner as the said land is being used for non-agricultural purpose only. According to the petitioner, she never sold the subject land to any person and that she was not put on any notice before passing of the impugned orders. However, questioning the said proceedings of the 1st respondent, the petitioner preferred a revision before the 2nd respondent-Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District, on 13.05.2009, along with an I.A. seeking suspension of the impugned orders passed by the 1st respondent. The grievance of the petitioner is that the said revision petition is not yet taken up for disposal and, on the other hand, she is being deprived of her land forcibly under the guise of the impugned orders. In the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits, the 2nd respondent, namely, the Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District, is directed to dispose of the revision petition purported to have been filed by the petitioner on 13.05.2009 against the orders dated 07.08.2008 of the 1st respondent within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such time, the orders dated 07.08.2008 of the 1st respondent, impugned before the 2nd respondent, shall stand suspended. Further, if the petitioner is continuing in possession of the subject land or any part thereof, such possession of the petitioner shall not be disturbed pending disposal of the said revision petition filed before the 2nd respondent. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU,J 03.11.2009 Note:- Issue CC in one week B/o v v