1 ( CAO 205 of 2011) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 205 OF 2011 IN REVIEW PETITION ST.NO.1557OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4390 OF 2009 State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Applicants Vs. Jayshree Chavan and Ors. ...Respondents ----- Mr.A.I.I. Patel -AGP for Applicants Mr. N.V. Bandiwadekar for Respondent No.1 ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 30th September, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of AGP for the State and the Respondent No.1. 2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 221 days in filing the review petition. The review petition is filed seeking review of the order dated 16th July, 2009. It is submitted that after the said order was passed, LPA was preferred by the State and the said LPA was allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file an application for review by order dated 5th May, 2010. The application for review has been filed on 11th January,2001.In the application for condonation of 2 ( CAO 205 of 2011) delay, it is stated that a period of four months was required for implementing the online admissions scheme which was introduced by the Government. In view thereof, the Applicants could not file the review application in time. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.1 submits that till today the order though it was passed in July,2009, it has not been implemented by the Deputy Director of Education. It is submitted that in the main Review Petition, a different reason has been given for the delay caused in filing this application for review. 4. In my view, sufficient cause has not been shown by the Applicant for delay caused in filing the review application and, therefore, in my view, this is not a fit case where the delay caused may be condoned. Hence, application for condonation of delay is dismissed. Consequently, review petition does not survive and it is also disposed of. (V.M. KANADE J.)