HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO Writ Petition No. 21314 of 2007 Date: 06.11.2007 Between: P. Srinivasa Rao … Petitioner and Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise, Hyderabad & others … Respondents O R D E R: The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. Acceding to the said request, permission is accorded. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn. But, however, by virtue of the interim order that was passed on 08.10.2007, the contesting respondent No.4 has been prevented from carrying on his business. Therefore, as a measure of mitigating the damage caused to respondent No.4 in the interregnum, the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) as exemplary costs in the form of Demand Draft/Pay Order drawn in the name of respondent No.4 and deposit the same with the Registrar (Judicial) within a period of four weeks from today and on such deposit, the latter will transmit the same to respondent No.4 along with a copy of this order. Consequently, the interim order dated 08.10.2007 passed by this Court in W.P.M.P.No.27650 of 2007 stands dissolved. (NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J) November 06, 2007 ksld