IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATORE AT BIL&SPUR 2003 ^"^^••" ^^y Rambharosa Dwivedi, aged about 49 years S/o Ramsundar Dwivedi R/o Satipara, Ambikapur Distcict Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS l. State of Chhattisqarh r ^i'·\·l.; ~"; 3eci ?'t - r.v Panchayat and Social Welfare Government of Chhattisgarh D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Union of'India, /Through S^retary Ministry of ~'\ Home a'ffairs (State reorganisation Cell New Delhi). Special Secretary Department of Panchayat and Social Welfare Government of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) Director, Eanchayat and Soclal Welfare Government of Madhya Prades'h, PETITION UNDER OF ARTICLES 226 OF IHDIA FOR~ WRITS OF CERTIORARy AND MANDAMDS FOR FURTHER SUITAgLE WRITS AND SSUANCE THE OF 1 i 1 •••si •ii jlil !-!- XI-HC-22 'S^ tiiiiciq, »T{I«'IS,f<tdl«1< *nwiTw*irai Sff^T 'q^RR ...^..M.fcEsl"Wl. 200 fa<><l!I" 3iA<iw iy»^w^w Mtiiq* W^a *B OUtifl l«W8<^«(te<l 28/4/2003 Parties as before. Order passed, slgned an Since common orders order be placed in the record cause title ol' memo of petitic •.* ' '' - . the copy of this Qrder ui each |d dated. h^.ve been passed, a copy of this tf all the connected ruLatters and |ris .may be aiiiiexed along with |case. A.R. (J) to do tl»eneedful. Sd/- Eakhruddm Judge qiitrfcitil^ ^mv^^^e^ ^S^^i iTdlpdl 3D^T {'ai^ftm w r-, M-HC.22 ^ s.-,:--^3^:^^;^^^... ., '3^1 •<lt«ll<"tci,(fTftti'l^ (•Idliiy sv^f xRiq? _ ^ ,.^^-urA£^r<?^^ -—ft^^- "-•••'?"'••- i. ^^ir'wai te^ !1P*1?: ~,^yIC^f vwwi«wa wihrt?iwijf4Ikid<Biw ^^VI^V '.wi'!MSK^ O R D E: ; (28-4-2QQ^) This,batch ofpetitions ha^ been filed-by the petitioners pursuant to thc crcatioir'of ^tates undcr thefM.P. State i»3illi^pOTga]3|l%^Aci 200&, The dj^putes^relate:tq^ttie aUocaflon ^jof the employees of Ole State povenunent. It i? Gontended -thal under the provisions of t±ie{Actand poUcy^&^iaed by and or ai the behest bf tlie Centi-^J Goveniment, options were iiwited. It is subinitted tiiat fiAal allocation has been maclc and aggrieved by the same th^se peutions have been filed '_ . ; . . .' 1 ^ ' . . . . ~ [ before fhi? Coiirt clalming rellefs mentloned theretn. 2. Learned counsel for all th^ petitioners stated at tlie Baj' tliat ui the preseiit batch of pe(itions, none of the petitioners is in iudiciai service or in tJie ^ei-vice of Vidhan Sabha. T!-ie\ . all sa'c cnii?Io\-ecs of rlie de[5aijtnients otlier thgn thc abovf said deDa.iTmcnrs. Ii js also sralred rhai some cases are llsiecl ar monoii hearing anci rhey ai'i^being heai'd analogously n'jtli [<»*firt 3 2 XI-HC-22 T*? "inwf, onl^'ic, («<<"11«<1< 3n^?ritRW *<t*«nitblpb ':(ikfit«t^ '^ 289 ai^VH fiFfr3II§! ^4fl5<l »*•<»diig wAA<fi4 'ft^ff'^J&^S tRi^R *«ftnah%n consent of the parties finally, |as copiQS have been suppliecl aiid the ackaowledgemerlts has|e been obfatned 3. Shri MLtrthv subxuitted (hat Central Govemraent has Gled the retum iii W.P. No. 2£|53/2002 and prayed that thc same be adgpted In aU con4ecied cases, whlch was nor opposed and aUowed. 4. Sliri Saiijay . K. Agra^al, Dy. Advocate GeneraL, submitted tliat State has filed <letaited retum in Writ Petitions No.2215/02 (Dr. R.K. Tiwai-i vs] State), No. 2547/02 (BIumrao vs. Uiiion of India) aiicl No:24p7/02 (Sluya Sliai'aji Slianiia vs. Unloi? of India). He furth^r submltted that the saine be adopted in other cases also, allowed. During llie coui~se ofai'g uctiiioncrs snbniirtccl that. tlie ina\ be lakPD/'fiied/ragged. whi.ch was not opposed and Iments, counse] for some oftlic have filcd tlic s.ynopsis. Th(-^ [^Wrt 3 M-HC-22 's^ -<<iqK-i<<, »Tilwie,f«<i-ll«!i< 3n^?r ^nra? IIIMI n»«<i»'~-::~"'"""""""""""^a^ ^iW(ck<fii inc?4ft?i3 tPwft*< t'afdiaiAd *^n»«iw<^ftfl ls? 6. Coiinsel for t.he petitinr cases, their spOlis^s are i !RFS point.ed oiit ,thar in snme ivorking ui 'the Govt./Semi Goveminent departnients ofj|pne State whereas they have been aUocatcd to another Sta.tj and in that view ,of tlic inattcr, they pray that ttley should la|Lve beefi allocated 10 the same State where TAeir spouses arf working. It is submitted thar reorganizadon of the State, ui|so fai' as they liave been posted ui sei3ai~aie Siate, has re scpai-ation causiiig disturbaiK iLilted in automatic judiciai c iii Llicu' faiiiUy Ufc, crs]x;ciall^ paj'uiig coiupaiiy ofcluldreii a}id pai'eiiLs. IL is submiLlcd tliai vhile deciding the aUocation rjiatter, thls aspect has not been considerecl in proper pi-osp|"ctive and tliere is need ro s-ecoiisider tlie saiue. Their caies should also be eoiisidered. It is coiitendcd r.hat po^ >.^oi'l)oration. LocaJ bodies, ting of serving 6]^oiises in ti'it- )i'poj'ate offices, organizarions tinn.in'-.iiruiions is also a cla^s of spoiises who clesen'e rhe sami" ('onsKieration. 'l'he\' coi^enrlecl that the\ aj-e seivine )]i [<<^^few I. 1: t '.' l' ia -{ 'S^ -<<i<<i<i<<, »ill««i6,fftnwy 3II^?T 'VRK «n««na>«<w> "W[. 288 ' (<<fc<u" aa^i yaw«H(<i ^>Wfe<^i ^iw^r^|Rt<<fi ^Pttgn ^a^nal^i ^thesR dftpartmfinrs lycaiise thejOovt. johs werft i^or available !?3»^i.; ! _. - ' 3fo|ltheia. They also contende<| that in case they are not allocated;ih. the same State, it njav resiilt in cruninal waste of ';7^?a?W~xT' ' : ' ' ; -•.l.fj- ' -' ' . not only inanpow'cr butiaay al^o create economic crises ai-id affect (he aational gro\vdi. (THelr cases may also be considered. 8. It is submitted that durin: persons have retired or nearing the some ±ieageof retu'ement, say thi; ycai- i.c. upto 31"'. Octobcr, 2Cf)3. Thcy submit tliat thcu- cases mav bc coiisidered so itiai tliere is 110 di£(iculL\ iii apportlonment of retiral benen^ and they may get the sainc at tlie earliest and may settle tllemselves in tli.eirhome ron-n. Their cases ma\ also be considet-ed. 9. It is 1'iu'tlicr subniitted b\ ^lic cOLinscl fur thc petitionei-s T-hai besiries r.lie cases ofsDousefc, ihere are oiher cases wl'iere final ailoraTion neecls t'Ltther consideration ancl XJ-HC-22 'S^ 'fWMf, ^»' ,fadlUy 3ff^?T 'VW •wwi a»»fl<»> 'ti^ a» fffcyif 3B^I«T 1^C^> Aft<t<| a>:w^^ift^ Of^WESVC SfrcT wudiruT«n>*^i ^a^PK^l •ftRonsiderarinn and caregnries 1i^<e manjags of parties aficr )ptiqn, cnutual' cases, bonafidij residence," non-caUing of iption etc. Wliich have been iae4tioned bv fhe petitioners in llicir rcspfcctivc pctitions. 110.'.,Jt.ls coni^nded ihat ihere.tre-some persons who have ;n mamed in benveen as their|mamage was eartier settled has taken place after tlie adpointed day i.e. 1-11-2000 ^here ai'e few cases of this categ^ry. Theii- cases may also be :onsid<;rctl. 1. Il is puiiiLed OUL Lliai emplo^ccs liavc applied for muluaJ '^llocation. Jl is siibmitted ttiat i^utual allocatlon is possilile 1.1nder the provisions of scheme ^nd the few cases of miitiia] llocatioiis have beeii consideded whereas cases of tl ;dlioncrs havc bccii rejected/n IC- [>t properiv considered. Ii i.s ['urtlici siiljniittrd tliat thc miitu^Ll arljustmciit is permissil^Ic id mav lie consiciered aiid esp<^ciall\' in ihose cases n'liei-e |he persons ai-iplving for mutual 41)ocat.ion clo not disiurb ^v {^^w ISii: IH% •;,^ XI-HC-22 b "s^g ''iwwi, »^(l«'i6,f«<<'<i«y Sf^f 'WR IIICTI a>Nlc»""""""""" """""'H^ 200 'fire^i' afl^CR f<ili'»»«^[<B fl>fW* W^I 'bl'rft+ti-f 1W*ff4 fe><3 <fi|4<H ^<^i** ^u^fl seniority pr orher-wise affectin^ the Rt-atR excheqiicr. rr is rliar there arKWCher categories ofe inployees Uke change of opdon after mflGE^age. 12. It is contendcd fhstt cert^npersons have riot been given place;oftheto'g§|?lCe.'G§usyopl^^&)Ta partlcnlar;State but are given anotheKState and undei| the policy they are entitled to be given tlie place 6f theu-fchoice. Their cases may be reconsider tn accoi-dance wifh Uicv ruay bc givcn thc placc of] the policy and tfit is possible, thcu' choicc. 13. Duiitig diclatioii, il i^ also submiLLed by S/Slui ' _. _ 1 Manindiya Shrivastava, P. Dlw^kar, Prashant Mistira, Rajcev Shrivastava, Awadh Tripathj, Sandeep Diibey and SmT. Haiiieeda Siddique tliat iii thejbatch, there are soine cases of theni wliere the eiuployees have chajiged their optioiis bccausc of tlic compcUing circJLinistajilccs nicntionccl tlicrr-in. 14. IT. mav be nored ihai ma|n^' of ihese maiiers have been hearcl on earlier dates. Hov-<fvei~, detallecl ai'gumenrs n'erc' [-^^fwt XI-HC-22 T^ -^l<<l<-t<<, ^flld'Ko, 1«<-11+11< an^r TRRi *ti*<ni t6W^> 'W[. M9 ' R«><{1|~' SV^W ^*tt<fc ^0^(1 s»**ft<* i^%a 30^w<ww< ^rffcd afivancRri on 23-4-2003 bnr.cni / - ' ' of the Court'and it was statedl the State of Chhattisgarh Shri Advocate Gcncral of tlBsStatc ol ^^:: .' . addresson^ehaIl|pf|SielTre^pecdve Siaies. Shri Murthy, t. '. < leanied coiinsel for the Union dflnclia was given time to seek |1d nor. be cnndiiflef! ri11 Tising •d- Ithat the Advocate General of Ravindi-a Shrivaatava and the 'M.P. Shri V.K.Tai-ikha would defuiite instructioris/from the D{i-ector (S.R.) concemed on rlie ^arding consideration of the w<src dircctcd to bc listcd foi questions raised especiaUy re rcprcscnte.tions eaid thc niattci| lieai-iiig 011 24-4-2003, lliercfoi| been Usled accordlngly. Argi.jments have been 'heai-d at exteiitio. 15. Shri Ravmidra Shrivastav; tlw Statc 6;' CSihat.tisgarh an^ Advocarc Or-ncral of tlie Starc o<] rhe allocauon under the provisi(} ACT 2(K.)0 is concernecl, Tliie po\^| <>K<w8-( iw*S4ft^t t(<i«(K ^3(^tFCT3^ff , baLuli of Lliesc cases liave , leai-ned Advocate General oi' Shri V.K. Taiiklia. k'ai'!i<-<! M.P. siibmitted thar so fa^ a' isoi ihe M.P. Reorgajiisarioii !r is vestecl wiTJ'j t|-ip Onir;'il [^^fBR XI-HC-22 :''i;'*UttSftft#»^-IS''l? -: ;.^-^%^^^.-^' 's^ •<ii<<i<i<<, ^Tftu'Ki, ftiway ~~~'-' KfSfS^- , 3n^?T 'vt^s ^^Sy^K^ --'.1".«-•".^ffy^.fAt-A.&g^t.ris- *<1*<CTI <»*<10> R«><iK' ~~'W(. 200 dll^fl^ll fqiro 3R^ff flft^a SI'iHT^i )A<1 1<W^fl fl-WB^K ftfta i A?-—- ^trfw&i •ff'K'iT'ifftsftlftRgR "^ Ad^rt sb^ti' ^ Govt. and J'he role of rlie re; aid aiid a'ssist the Central' information. It is subruitted I do so as and whcn reqi.iuj dlrecied bf thls.Court. SpRCtive'State govRmments is to Govt. and'provide the^tieqiusite ;hat thev have done so aad would :d bv the Ccntral Oovt. or as 16. So far as provisions repating to sei-vices are concemed, ; sections 68, 69, 70, 71 afcd 72 ai-e relevant.ahd quoted below:- :a'!N "68. Provisioiis rclatiiifc to scrviccs_in Madliva Piad<»h and Chhattisgarh-(l) (Ever^' person who immediately beforc Ltie appoiiiLe(L4ay is servuig iii cuiniecLiou wiLli the affairs ofthe exist^-ig State of Madhya Praesh shall, on and from that dav tirovisionallv continue to sci~ve m connection with the laiTairs of the State of Madh\ a Pradesli unless he is| reqiiired, by general or special order of tlie Ceiiti-al C}ovcniirient to serve provisioiiali\ in coiinection with I the affairs of; the State of ChhaTTisgai'n: Provivlcd thar 110 dire sectioii at'ter r1ie expii| •Jav. ;uoji sl-ial! be issued under tliis \ of' one vear from the appointed •jav. (2) As soon as uia\'| be after the appouited day, the CeiiTraJ GOVT. ShallJ h\ generai or special order. clel.eriiiine UTIC succes^ i-efe!'i~ecl to in sub-secl sor State to vvl-uch evei-y. person i oi-i (1) shall be linaUv aUotted Ibr -icrvice aiid the datt \\-irli effcct from which sucii f»^» -M-HC-22 XI-HC-22 aiKff^ii ft'n??Bi^?n ri)trfq> tida •<^;'^^^^aS^?'." ^.•.^-;*. 9 v^ •<ii<<i<i<<, 'Brftwi^, ftgirey 3n^?r •qsre trowBBihs"""••—••—•"—~———^p^ ^g^ 'Pre^ti' w«tS^I«<aqi(Wff^I ftl wAfd^ ti'yjT4ft^t <fl|*{I( PCT^bio (3) Every , person whc) is fmally allotted under rli^ provisions Qfsub-sectio4"(2) to a successor State siiall, if he is not ah-eady servi4g tlterein be made available for State from such date as mav be Goverruuents concerned or in seivmg in the successor] agreed upon between th{ default of such agreeme^t, as may be detemiined hy t1ie Central Qovernment. 69.Provisions relating tt> ofher services-(l) Nothuig m this sfectlon or section 6$ shall be deemed to affeci on or after the appqinted dayjfhe operation of the provisions of Chapter I ofpart XIV 4>ffhe C'tonstitution inrelation to ^nditions of service of persons Kth tlie affairs of ttie Union or determhiation of the seivmg UT. coniiecuon anv State : Prov.ided tliat the co ImiBedlately betbre the persoii deeiued to liav( Madhva Pradesh or to Section 68 stiall iio.t except with the previou! iditions of sei-vice applicable tppointed day In the case ot aiiy bcen allocated to tlie Stale uj' h-e State of ChlTa.ttisgarh under )e vai'ied lo liis disadvaiitaye ofthe Central Govemnient. (2) AU services prior to fhe appointed day rendered hy a person- (a) if he is deen.'jed to have been allocatcd to aiiy State under section 681 shall be deemed to have 1-iepn widi the affairs of tliat Statc, we been allocated to the Ihuo:! ll'ie aclminisu'arion oi' ilic rcndered in L-onncctioii {bj if he is deeinecl t.o 1: in connecnon virh Cliliattisgarii sliall be ; leeiiieci to have been ren(!ei'(.\i ii'i coiLnecTion \vith rlie a1T<iirs ot'rhe LIn1on, foi thc purposcs of tllc | Liics icgulating liis condition-s of service. (3) The provisions of ^eciion 68. shall noi a'f)p[v iii relalion lo niembers ol'bnv All India Service. 7.". Provisions as TO (}(^nUnuanice ol' oflicers in ScUiii.- [X)st- (1) Evcry perso|i who. irniiiediatelv 'oefoie it'ir (<»^w •'" "'•-^^^-i;^^!^?''."..-"--,-'•.. 10 XJ-HC-22 WlilflWI fiitti?l> 9t^V i^'^lflffifl 7i? •<<1<11<>1<1, »l(]wi6,ftMIWy 3n^?r inra? IIICTI tB*IK*>"""""""""'"""""""""'H^ 200 ftrestt' w^dWWT^ftff appointed day is holding] post or 'office in connec existing State of Madhya that dav falls withln anv contuiue to hold the successor State, and shal] day, to have been duly ap the Govemnient of, or in, that guccessor Stare : Provided tha.t nbthing ui prevent a competent a| appointed dav, froni pass] aiiy order affectuig the office. 71. Advison' Couiinittees- Tl bv order establish one or tlie purpose of assistiiig it h] (a) the discharge of any of aiid (b) the ensLu~ing of fair atij perspns anected by the ^ proper consideration of such persons. 72. Powei of CentraJ Guverl Central Governnieii; inay, gi'| Goveniineni 01 Maclli'^'a P!'acl( ot'Chliattisgarh as inay app^- piirpose ot' giving ef't'"ct tn t)( Pajt ancl tli^ Staic Govei'iii directions." |or discharging dnties of an\ dtion with the affaii-s of Uie pradesh in any area wliich on lof the successor States shall ^me post or offlce ui that be deemed, on and from that >(»inted to the post or office by otlier appropriate autliority uidu'lli wxflOk'A <ftt<i< 1^1*1 <OR«I ar)v Ij-ds Section shatl be deemed to Lithority, on and from the |ng in relation to such person 'ontuiuaiice in such post or he Centi'al Goveniment may, ulore Advison7 Committees tor regard to- ts fuiictions mider this Pai't; equitable treatment to all ^-ovisions of this ParT and rhe ^-i\v reprcsentations niade by imeiit to give dircctions- Tlic such directioiis to the Stff.te sh ancl rlie Srare Govemmeni >r t.o ii io bc i~iecessai-\ for l)ie "' Toregoing provisions of tliis it-nt sliall coiiiplv witli siicli t'«^firt 1 XI-HC-22 XI-HC-22 12 T^ -<<l<41<iq, dTflwii^, t'ldltiy ••^tSivii 11 •--^''^•••'iaii'^^--^A'', 'S^ •<ii<<ii-i<<, t?nltf<is, hdiuy 3ff^?T XR^ *n*<ni a>*<i«i 'H^ 200 ' Rl*<itT" sn^nw Iitti<l> <xA<l «>*ri^> tt^d SB^?n»«n^i< 10 *i<<wBi iitdTitfls^ <R|«(K "^fliPtR^n^ff 17. Tt is siihmittefl In Shri IV bifurcation of the State o irthy that rhftre was pi-ocess of M.P., tlierefore, the policv guidelines were franied sepeLijate vide Ai-inexiires-R/1, R/2 and R/5. State of Chliattisfee l/11/2000. The Govemment | conterred under Section 71 ol feai-h caruc uito cxistcnce on of India in exerclse of powers the M.P. Keorganization Act, 2000 constituted a committe{& bv order dated Januai-\- 1, 2001 uiider Chainuansliip ol mcuibcrs, vvliicli is populai'ly 1| is fut'Llier subuiitlcd Lliat ul 1,62,46 t ,employees of 9 t dep; provisional allocations were. n allocalioii, certAi]] iiaines co| CeiitrQi Governiiieiit dccide<i allocation iisl, covcriilg al] intbrming ilieiii of r.heir 131-0^ oilier snrcessor StaTe and invi] Sliri N.B. Lohani with other iiowii as Lohaiii Coiuiuittcc. It aLLcrs of allouaLiuii of aboLii irtmenTs were dealt with. First lacle. Tn rhe said provisiona] ilc! iiol find pla.ee. Tlien tl'ie o introfluce a tentativc linui pc-i sonncl and t.ciilaiivcl\ ised allocailon ro one or rhe ng represenT.atlons t'rom rhein ('l»^fa^ 12 XI-HC-22 an^Kil ftil?i aiiSn tt**fl^?w^a 's^ -^nw<i, oxftyi^, Rldltiy an^yr iRra? *<i«<n(l>*<t<n"~~"': .————..^^ y^ 'fi«l<y<" 'Ott^O V«HW«WI aft< against r.hc same. ThRrefore, fhe representations before These representa.tions wer dcpaitmcnt and they wcic consideraitfin and 4014 rep tlie claims of about 467! GoveiTinient considered tlj 8692 aggnevftd personne] madc [the State^Advisdty Committee. exainu^ed bv the conccrned Ibnvardcd to thc coniniittcc foi~ 'escniations were accepted ancl [? were rejectecl. The Central [e request of State Advisory rcprcscntations wcrc rccci CliliaiLisgai-li, iii llcu of M. commlttee. It is further sub 219 excess oprees, 43 additicj Ceiilra' Goveniuieiil.. It is i OoveniiiicDt lias donc its bd ilicic i~s 110 [u'cjtK.iicc against ir; Miii-Th',, appearir •ilalecl a.iul suljiiiittccl tlli »lllwflf"Wffff ^t ft^l tfa<<i< ^ 4tP<W •OB^B Coiniuittee aiid decided to ajlocate 219 excess optees, whose tod to tlic SLICCCSSO]' Statc of '. as recoiiiiuciided b\ Llic said iiitT.ed that in addiTion to aliove ial cases vvere consiflered b\ tlif' Iso subinit.led that l.1ie Ceiili.ul -iT liiider tlic: circui)ihlaiiCt;h uijti inv pc-rson. fo]' tiie l.inion of ,'nctia !aiil\ ij' tlie icpreseiit.alioiis aj' c<»«^ XJ-HC-22 13 TS? -<<l^lfl<<, 9T(l«'lli, tlfiwy an^ST 'v^ HIICTI tR*<fe 'BT, 200 R<t<lti" an^Kii fkllyl w^» wn^ v i0 flra ^tiSfl »WI<1<tlftn *>l<llW<1 tOtttif-it ft^l <ftH<K ^^tPai W^ff siilimitted dnly snpporreri hy|ri"c"m<'n''s and copy nf rhp petitions and annexui-es filed;- t(ie Centcal Govemment u-ould consider flie saine afresh. It lis subinitted that the Policv which lias bccn fraracd is afttr duc cunisidcratioil aiid tlic representatlons wlll. be decli^ provisions of law ancl the polici^ ;(T in accordance wlfh rhe s franied. 19. It 1s coniended that f^lr and equimble TTearmenT envisages a declsioi~i, n'hich s falr aiid equitable to all. decision of the Honlile Apex Rellance has been placed on a{ Court in the case of State of Mlal-ia.i'ashtra vs. Chandrakailt. re]^orted iii AIR 1981 SC 1990. 20. Il is pci-tiiicnt tu i-iutc tjliat Scctiuii 71 of tlic M.P Reorgai'iization AC; ^".jii" casts enphrinpf) imder ihe s;-ii<) Act. equiialilc treatuieiit to all |:'ers' dut\ oi] Cenn-aJ Ooverniiieni Wl-iat is pnsnrerl is t'air an') ns affected b\ the provisions ol Pai-i. VIII and Tlie prol^er coiisicleration of an\ rcjli-csc-iitatioiis iiiaiii- bv sucli ]^?rsoil. It is f'or thc Cciitrai ['ftA^srt ••t^ XI-HC-22 14 T^ -<iww<i, »tfl«'is,[inwy 3TT^?T 'qSR? •nwfi a>w> "ffl. 200 fii<i<y CT^(W ftttl* OtA<fl *>*ff^i tf%d *H^^I lWiqi< Oftfl ^>i«<lCT<fli *itlwff 4 fc*4 <Rf*S^K '^'SlPtWW^I GovfiTiment. to finsiire fair ^nd eqiiitahlc treatmRnr rn all persons affected by tl-ie relevajnt provisions of the part VIII of thc M.P. Reorganlzation considcration of any represcrj Under the facts and clrcunisj [Act 2000 and the proper Itations iiiade by such persons. canCes xhis courr woiild llke 10 obsei've that power of' Centraf. Ctovernment is not exhaustecl nierelv by layiiig down cn condnues rill entire procesl doubts rcsolvcd aiid all rcprc^ 21. Having thus considered the case anci in view of the s| un bclialf of Uic pai'tics, ui tli lUSTice 'vill L)e sc'rvef"! il' ail ]ieTlTioners, tl'iosp wlio (} represeiitarion raising rheir g| tei'ia for final allotment but ; is coinpleted, all problems. cntatioiis coiisidcrcd. the tacts and circumstances of Lateuients inade bv thc coi.ins»~.i c u]-)inion uf tliis Court, ciid-s oi' opporninir'i is given rn ii";( ^sii-p, TO make a clpiaiiri •ieva-nces along \\'ith docuinenis oii or bctbi-e ]0'n ^·!a^ 20('J|3 to ihe Oillral Governilie]]t adciicssctl lo llic Goveriiii^eiit. ol Iiiilia. Depai'tuicDl ul [•4»Wrt H •:.., XJ-HC-22 15 'S'st -*iwm<i, ®tfltf<ie,pinitiy 3n^?r 'IRW «i«(>iiniiKb "tlt 200 'ftre^i' OI^I'EI flill^l W^W ff*lW>W^(I ff**W -awtSw ^tOtSK tl ff snfepft^la'R'ffAjk'ft <ni<<i< ^'®tftw)iu%iff Personal and Trainiiig, Mu4stiy of Personal, Pi-iblic •^'•. " '.•'•' •- . 1 n» • Grievances^siad Pensions, Loldi^yak Bhawan, KUan Market, New Deltu ia(8tates Reoi^anizatu^n Cell). Same copy of the rcprcscntation dul}' .sHPPOrted 1 by all documcnts bc also sei've^n th^cJQnceriie^lBepaj^jients ofboai^he^tates after obtaining tlie acknowledgemerjt and both U'le States to fbrward the same jto the Gen coninients and fhe requisite iiifoj witluii 30 days, ui order to eiiab] ral Govemment' with fheir ination and coniplete details e tlie Ceiitral Qoveniment to [dcGide the rcprcscntation. Itjs |jpen to tlie Cena-al Govt. to 'lseek siichl further mformation t'om the State Qovemments and on. such. requisition bejii Goveniinent; tlie State Goveni^iients u-ill supply tlie ssuiie ixpeditiouslv. On such a repr CcntraJ Govcrnuicnt sliail consjclci and dccidc -thc sajiic as 'g made frora the Centra] :sen;ation being iiiacle. r)i< eari\' as uosslble ureterabli' on j^assing api^ropriare orclers. r berore 31" Julv, -2U03 ID\ [^Ws^ XI-HC-22 vSwl tow'^l^ Sl>*»^flttFd 16 '3^ •<<|<(|<'|<<, gtfltl'is, (wiwy sn^r v^ HIICTt d>*U«l»' "W^. 209 ^ti^rt nwi^^fta t? 'ffis^ff '1?1^11^^rt^rt *rf^<) ^^w petitioners ofttuase cases at^ thi8faB?y^ttleBePreseiG(tatiol 22. So;fer asthe cases ofnjyised options are concempr), thp ^idu^cted'to specifically raention / [i. Theu- repreaentations shall be .;'^-?.^^^^""!?~—;•^—^"^^^•'^:'; decidcd by the Gentrail Qovt. bs dirccted abovc. It is also aiadc elieajg(.jtiat^IUiei't>®y.fiffiier^^ii8loyeesw^Ul Femaln on dury :i3<Sig!.K, • ! '••^y':i'^vgf;~':i' -• on 1/8/2003; |to recsive |the ctecision of the Central Goverainent on thfiir r^res^atatkins. 23. Counsel for the petiflo interuns orders^passed by relieved and thev are continjuing the Bar bv th.e coi-insel f] ^ers^submitted tJlat piirsuant to ;his. Coiirt, they have not been i. This statement is made at 3r the petiuoners and tliis is i-ccurdcd. Coi-uiscl for thc Stitte subinittad that thcv could nur veiii'v abour tlie inclividual dases ancl rlie sr.aienienr. macle ai tlTP' Bar mav be recorded. It' fouiid tl'iat Uie petitioners ihey nia\ be given liberty applicatiou for luodification. jn somp cases or rh's oThpr, it is [lave made uicorrect statement, to make a menuon bv lilhis FThc statciuciits ai-c rccordcd <:uii..l [<i»^a^ .^WSWS^Sta-'wsf^y.s.^i,,.^.,^ 18 17 ^SS^^^t^ r^^*iirtr?Ai XI-HC-22 "S^ -IIIKII, BT(ltf'l<», (iCTIUy 3TI^?T 'lR9» *u*<ni «»»*il«li""~""""-""""~'~"""""^^200 "" Rloq«' siSws I^i^* ^qclfl Wfll^ ^WW ^VtflWc-W ir 4>KdH^I*( WW111? 3fc*«fl^fi»*£i< "^ iftfSOT 88%ff :^i. ' l ' the liberty is^|gn?Rn m the: S^ate, as.prayeri. Relying on .the statements^made, it is direeted that if the persons are not / ' relieyed.they shall.notflbe^ell^ved. In the circumstances, k is TES3B?a',-?Si8''B.;^:^1- "^•""ssssff'i^ dmscted that till thc^^lieci^ion is givcn by the Ccntral Ivho faave not been reUeved and fcwed to continue. So far those ioncemed, tliey should mention Govemmeati^i still coiitmumgiAsti.aJtflbe aU .•(.T1.. who have been ^slieved are c tl-ds fact in theu- represent4.tion and it is for Uie Centi-al f* •• . Govcnuucnt t6i -pass suc(a oi-dcr which Uic Ccnti-c GovenuueiiL deeuis Ul. II is the rei^resentation woiild be 1 biiade clcaj- Llial llie decisioii 011 :ommunicated to the concemecl departments, who aft.er reGe|ving it would commi.inicate it ro the eniployees concemed. Tl^e directioiis are beii-ig issued to ' I . the respectivc depQTtinents| so tliat thc decisioi-i takeii is scrvcd on tlic pctitioncrs. 2^. In The opinlon of this (l^iurr. u.. is in rhe ImeresT ot' rlie emniovees as well as the rispecrive Governments That riie ['»wrt XJ-HC-22 sstwi Pi'ff?ft ^AO IB^ Wi^o •.'j \:.-. •^-^^^;:^sa^^^^? S^a--.^.;-uuyt..— 'S^ •<IHIVTi, ^^WW, fatflUy 3ff^I tRRS —NI«<CTIt6NI» "^0^209 ^flWQ VWWtJfWV fti <M<<ti<Bi w|df4ft«d<(iHj^< orders are itnplemRntRd, allff'at.ions .are finaliz-ed an<i tlic persons'start working, so thatjentire'raatter is fuiaUzed at tlie earliest and the resp^etive p^rao.nnel should devote tinie in pcribnning fhcir duiHsssinstcap of litigating. ?i^€^^:^;..?:^.• • ^ ;• •-^^&-.. l^<1'^1/v/^<^'^1 K 25. ^t is'inad^gcdeQEitluit^i^iB'C^urttias^^ the ..;.-i.^i. ../.'. ',• ..'^ .. ' ••::- inattcr on broad consensus |u~rivcd at bctwccn the pai-tics and has noi expressed'anyop^'iloa on the meriTsor otherwise of the case ana'it is left ft)t coi^siderafion of the l^ntral Governiuent. 26. With these observationsfthesepetitions are disposed of >t _ .. ; flnaUv. ' 27. Coiiscqucntly, M.W.P.s |& I.A.s, if anv, staild dispuscd OI'. 28.'" Be.fbre parting, this C()Tu'r appreciates rhe valualilp assistaiice rendered by coi4isel for the petitioners, Shi-i Ravindra Shrivastava, Advoc^.te Generol of State of C.G ai-ici liis collcagucs, aiid Slii-iV.K. faiika, Advocatc Ociicrajl ofM.F. [^&^fe^ XI-HC-22 an^t^iT Riltl aijSio wwia c 1' ^ 1^1 '••:-i-~'-vs^,',g;^ 19 T5g -<<1<4CT<<, »fll+l'I6,(•idltiy 3n^?r iraq? \^\f ^-/6^/2^'_ «im«wn»»n* "S^. 200 R«i^s(" ^u^n 1t^<»^<flftd and his .colleagues, Shri V| »K(H<-Iin(ff4ft<<fl <BH<I< ^'flBftRflR^ff V.S. Myrthy, Addl. Standing Counsel for Uiiion of India, ay.'.of wtusin. assisted the Court ii-i arriving broad consensus in a|inatter Uke this. Ccrtificd copy to thc ^ctitioncrs/thcu- fcounscl aftcr incorporation of the ainendm^ ^^•.•; Gopy to State'counsel nt.etc. if directed eai'Uer. ?®oththe'Statesi& oounsel for Union of Indla free of cost for fonvardmg it to respective Govem.m.ents for complLance.J Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge 28-4-2 [l^^firt