FAO No. 1047 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH FAO No. 1047 of 2011 Date of decision February 28, 2011 Harpal Singh ....... Appellant Versus Ramkali and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Sukhmeeet Singh, Advocate for the appellant. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? Yes 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? Yes 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?Yes K. Kannan, J (oral). CM No.2705-CII of 2010 1. For the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed. Delay of 3 days in filing the appeal is condoned. FAO No.1047 of 2010 2. The appeal is on a technical issue that the Tribunal had passed an award to the widow representing herself and also for children who are not impleaded as parties. In a case where legal representative is not impleaded the appropriate procedure for the Tribunal to adopt shall be to implead them. If it is not done the Court can determine an amount and direct that the amount is paid to a particular person as a trustee for other legal representatives as well. In this case, the Court has named the children who are not parties and has in some way protected FAO No. 1047 of 2011 2 their interest also. If at all, the Tribunal has done greater justice awarding compensation also to persons who ought to have been impleaded but who were not impleaded. This cannot cause any prejudice to the appellant and he cannot treat himself as an aggrieved person to come on appeal. 3. The appeal is dismissed. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE February 28, 2011 archana