1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.999 OF 2007 Imtiaz Ahmed Patel .. Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.Mihir Desai for the petitioner. Mr.M.V. More, AGP for the respondent-State. Mr.R.M. Vamoo for respondent Nos.3 and 4. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & J.P. DEVADHAR, J. J.P. DEVADHAR, J. J.P. DEVADHAR, J. DATED : 13th March, 2008 DATED : 13th March, 2008 DATED : 13th March, 2008 P.C. : 1. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the appointment of the petitioner with effect from 2006 has been decided and order has already been passed. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in terms of the order of President of one man Grievance Committee dated 3-1-2006, the respondents have not taken into consideration the services as Shikshan Sevak with effect from 1-10-2000 to 16-1-2002. 2. Let representation be filed by the petitioner within two weeks from today, which if filed shall be considered within four weeks 2 thereafter and appropriate orders be passed. 3. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE J.P. DEVADHAR, J.