1 Cri.W.P. No.898 of 2011 hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 898 OF 2011 Babu Venkatesh Koli and anr. ... Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra and Anr. ... Respondents Mr. R.M. Upadhyay, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.A. Shaikh, A.P.P. for State. Mr. Somendra Singh for respondent no. 2. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL,J. DATED : AUGUST 25, 2011 P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as also the learned counsel for respondent no. 2. The parties are present in the court and they are identified by their respective counsel. Affidavit of respondent no. 2/original complainant is taken on record. In the affidavit respondent no. 2/original complainant submits that incident has taken place due to prevailing circumstances beyond the control of respondent and petitioners herein. The act was owing to human behaviour and to react against the prevailing circumstances. Therefore, both the parties have decided to resolve the controversy. In the light of this affidavit, FIR No. 2 Cri.W.P. No.898 of 2011 231 of 2009 dated 30/09/2009 culminated into C.C. No. 119/PS/2010 pending before the learned 45th Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Mazgaon, Mumbai is quashed in terms of powers under section 482 of Cr.P.C. Writ petition to the extent above stands disposed of as compounded. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)