^^y^rf ;-"!? c '~?-=T> IN THE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SfV^-0 Writ Petitio^lo. J2-W/2007 PETITIONERS ^ (^s( x^ ^^^ ^' ^^'•^rv-"" ¥Sy /'y"' ^ \~ 1. D. D. Natekar, S/o Late Shri D. N. Natekar, aged about 54 years, Accounts Officer,C.R.E.D.A., R/0 H-2/Shri Ramnagar, Near TV Tower, Rafpur, {Chhattisgarh} 2. C. S. Goswami, S/o Shri Horampuri Goswami, aged about 44 years, Executive Engineer, C.R.E.D.A., Rekhankar Colony, Manendragarh Rd., Ambikapur, Surauia, {Chhattisgarh} 3. R.. K. Gajpalla, S/o Dev Singh Gajpalla, Accounts Officer, C.R.E.D.A., R/o B-404, Krishna Vihar, Vidya Nagar, Bilaspur {Chhattisgarh} y-- Versus RESPONDENTS /" ^eiiss^ '•'^'s^'^^^' >S- fl s'? /, 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Deptt. of Energy, D.K.S. Bhawan, Govt. ofChhattisgarh, Raipur {Chhattisgarh} 3.. State Madhya Pradesh, Through the Secretary, General Administration Deptt., Vallabh Bahwan, Secretariate, Bhopal, {Madhya Pradesh} 3. The Managing Director, Madhya Pradesh Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd., Bhopal, R/o Urja Bhawan Shivazinagar, Bhooal -fMadhva Pradesh} 4. The Chief Executive Officer, Rajya Akshya Urza Vikas Abhikaran, Shankar Nagar, Raiour -fChhattisqarh')- 5. The Secretary, Through Lokayukt, Near Old Secretariate, Bhooal {Madhya Pradesh} WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA OF THE .? •:/ 2--".^/' Si£^^^K sn^i1w Ki'fi.'* 311^1 sh*1 'HfFtf Tumane 3' -FSf ^fflRTO, dTil+lilti, i«lcll«1< w.f, WW'iT »)*fiqi [i-^IZ^- ••/-•g^ / 200 31^1'TC'IW ~Hf?3 SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava. J. 28-03-2011 Smt. Anju Ahuja, counsel for th^ petitioners. Shri S. K. Mishra, Panel Lawye Shri Vaibhav Shukla, counsel fc|r respondent No.3. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, counsel for Heard. Learned counsel for the pet|itioners submits that she has no instructions. However, learned State courlsel draws attention of this Court towards applications of the petition|ers filed along with the reply as Annexure R-4/1. Under these circumstances, tt)e petition is dismissed for want of prosecution, however, with liberty to r for consideration. •*l''li<'f'li)-l *<iiai'? feet <r«i]<rii< i? sifigir STI^T forthe State/respondent No.1. espondent No.4. ^vive, if cause of action still survives Sd/- M.M. Shrivastava Judge [••Ni^fe^ •:-i^B^ 1s:^^S& ga ssssai