HC-22 an^F^i R-li+ 3D^T shHi^ yfia T^ '^ipff?ra, 'g^ihn®,(qini'My WRV: Shliqi -^ 200 fa'btiS' 31^1'SWIWHfOT SINGLE BENCH: HON'BL W.P. rd N0.4423/2007 PETITIONER Vs RESPONDENTS Bhaiyalatl Manrakh^ Agricultui|ist Chuchuhl 1. State 19,03,2808 |of Chhattisgarh, ThroughSecretary, Administration, Deptt. Mantralay, Bhawan, Raipur, P.0. & Dlstt. /f (C.G.) Colleeftor, Bilaspur (Chhattlsgarh). S|ub-Divisional Officer, Bilaspur (C.G.) |ri through Sub Divisional Magistrate, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Geneilal D.K.Sl Raipul 2. 3. Thei 4. Patwali p.o. d Slub- Mr. B.R. Ghosh, Advocate f4 Mr. V.V.S. Murthy, Deputsj Sovemment Advocate for the Stat4 Heard. Grievance of the petitioner| bearing Khata No.581, Survey N4 acres. He intends to sell a portio)' financial requirement and therefor^ officer for filling up Form No.22, wfl registered sale deed. However, he| that respondent No.3-Sub Divisj Annexure P-1 which mandates tlt would be necessary. Respondet Annexure P-1, has no such power '4>Hl(vt-41'l T=fFRTf ^ t^t •<f^ $l< ^3lf:OT 311^1 E JUSTICE DHIRENDRA MISHRA aged about 57 years, Sfo Late Shri in, Caste Satnami, Occupation R/o Ganesh Nagar, yapara, Bilaspur(C.G.). r the petitloner. Advocate General with Mr. Arun Sao, is that he is recorded owner ofthe land .2/2 area 0.55 & Survey No.3 area 3.(» i of the above land due to some urgent 3, he approached the concerned revenue hich would be necessary for execution of was apprised by respondent No.4-Patwari ional Officer has issued a circular of lat to effect sale deed colonizer licence it No.3, who has issued the circular of jnd^rthe C.G. Land Revenue Code, 19% -^...^--f' m F- k- sn^w^i n<-fi?b -sn^T ^^ ^l%^f A^ 'S'si -^Hld^, 'S^TRT'TS, I°i<ni'H'i< 3^it?T 'q^? WHpn sfr* »i •M 200 (^•biiST" sri^r'^sniSR'oftg ~z. de^d to direct his subordinates to insistl No.22 before execution ofsale ^4r. Murthy, Deputy Advoc^te instruction from respondent No.3-pub production of colonizer licence a<| requirement of law. However, ifth^ the person concerned could be prcjsecuted Adhiniyam, 1982 and the revenuel No.22 to the intending seller on| colonizer licence. Submission made by tearn^d is taken on record. Inviewoftheabove ^)l<<feT4t'f "RTERff ^ t^st <f^l^l-(. ^T 3lfSn 3II^?I for colonizer licence while providing Form General for the State, after seeking Divisional Cfficer, fairly submits that the time of transfemng tand is not the land Is transferred in viotation of any law, under Vinirdishta Bhrasta Achran authorities could not refuseto give Form the pretext that he does not possess Deputy Advocate General for the State submis^ion, the instant petition is disposed of. Sd/- Dhu'endra Mishra Judge [^^fig^ !1