1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 350/2009 (Ramdas Shyamraoji Sorte VERSUS Nav Chetan Shikshan Sanstha Nagpur & others) AND Writ Petition No. 30/2009 (Kamlakar Wamanrao Gandharwar VERSUS Nav Chetan Shikshan Sanstha Nagpur & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.R. Patil, counsel for the petitioner. Shri A.S. Jaiswal, counsel for the R-1. Shri A.M. Deshpande, A.G.P. for the R-4 & 5. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 26, 2009. Since common questions of facts arise in these writ petitions, they are heard together and are decided by this common order. By these petitions, the petitioners challenged the judgments passed by the Presiding Officer School Tribunal, Nagpur on 20.08.2002 dismissing the appeals filed by the petitioners under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. On hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the impugned judgments, it appears that the School Tribunal did not commit any error in dismissing the appeals filed by the petitioners. The petitioners were 2 appointed on 20.06.1994 only for a period of one year. The appointment of the petitioners came to an end at the end of the academic session on 30.04.1995 due to the expiry of the term. The petitioners challenged the termination order dated 31.03.1995, which terminated the services of the petitioner with effect from 30.04.1995, before the Presiding Officer School Tribunal, Nagpur. The School Tribunal, in the aforesaid facts and circumstances, rightly dismissed the appeals filed by the petitioners by relying on the judgment in the case of Hindusthan Education Society Versus C. Kaleem Sk. Gulam Navi & others reported in 1997(5) SCC 152. There is no error whatsoever, much less, a jurisdictional error in the judgments passed by the Presiding Officer School Tribunal, Nagpur. In the result, the petitions fail and are dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE APTE