SiMie Bsncti uf' [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fC.G.1 W.P. N0.43>^°> /2004 rS.B.1 PETITIONER RESPONDENT; >^^i ^%y ..•^y ••'°-^"y ^y ^p- '^y '^ ^ r'€^\°\ ^^ •t.^ :.\" f/Z-{-'^ ?-^\)-" Laxmneshwar Machhuwa Sahka-ri Samiti Maryadit, Kharod, through- President Tulsiram Aditya aged 34 years S/o late Nakchhed Prasad, R/o Manjhapara, Kharod, Tah. Pamgarh, Distt. Janjgir-Champa [C.G.] VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through-SecretaryDepartment of Cooperative State of Chhattisgarh,-D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur [C.G.]. 2. Assisfant Registrar Cooperative Society, Janjgir, Distt. Janjgir- Champa [C.G.'| 3. Mahamaya Machhuwa Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Kharod, Tah. Pamgarh, Distt. Janjgir- Champa [C.G] PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 311^1 ^FT f^n^sn^T $h^i°n ^a ^ i<*y Sarve ^\ ^J ^./ y w ^ ^ ^ ' ' ^" ^sg -4NH*<. ^Tiiy^ rc«'iwi< ,^....^.^..^.R..,..H^J^ 'I^^T' ^IHdl ^*1|Gb 3?TT^T ^^HW^f^T fdr 3.1-2005 Shri H. V. Sharma, counsel for ] Shri Sumesh Bajaj, De| State/respondents 1 and 2. The petitioner has preferred the Constitution of India stating that the application filed by the petitioner| rospondent No.3. 1 have heard leamed counsei Learned counsel for the of the guideljnes issued by the SahaRari Samiti can be registered respondent No.2 has registered. No.3 which is contrary to th@ ab^ petitioner has preferred an applicatioi| re§pondentNo.2. Therefore, leamed| that respondent No.2 may be petitioner in accordance with !aw. Having heard learned counsell the facts and circumstances of the decide the appjication of the petitioner | WJth the direotjon aforesajd, the) Parties are entitled for certified |he petitioner. >uty Govt. Advocate for the t|iis petition under Artlcje 226/227 of |he respondent No.2 is not deciding for cancellation of the registration of petitic|ner apjart direct^d cbNfd^il-l ^H<rff ^ fe1^ <r^^l< ^ ^rf^T ^qi^T •theparties. submitted that as per para 10.4 iovernment oniy one Machchuara fl'thin the raciius of 8 km, whereas, from the petitioner. respondent )VQ guideiines, against which the which is not being dedded by the counsel for the petitioner submitted to decide the application of the |for the parties and having regard to c^se, respondent No.2 is directed to in accordance with law. 1 petition stends disposed of. ^opyofthisorder. ___—- -—- Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge [Tit^ ^fo^