Siii- o «laL£ k-\° ?JT1 r^'&TiT-"^ t^A 'A.A, ^ 0\°<^-- st'^y^ \'"%,../" ^ ' KK-5 >?' •S>l-Y-'~ .-• ^s^1'"---"" %^-"' ^^?'1' \ *" fr'\ Shant Kumar Jaiswal S/o Late Shri Salik Ram Jaiswal, aged about -62 years, R/o village- Sarwani, Tahsil- Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS g^&:.-^f£. ^•g?t%T;Ti :NT A. State Chhattisgarh through Collector, Raigarh Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 2. Additional Collector, Raigarh Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). 3. Sub Divisional Officer (R), Kharsi? Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 4. Nayab Tahsildar Kharsia, Distt Raigarh(C.G.) . w'srs- •I :0'NST] mw np i t' S.i [C] it.snnn utfrit snt Kumar M ^e;rsnnf^or''t^ versus •i-7 Shant Kumar Jaiswa! State of Chhattisaarh and others ^?»nfViaitOj KUruat CylHEia, COUflSei TOf IH8 pBIiliOHd Shri Sushil Dubey, Govemment Advocate fbrthe c '/r^suuiiu^ Writ Petition ypder Artic!e 227 ofthe Constitution of India /0^,^,,^^_^ ^_s^ -^nth E^^;;^,^^ ^j-i,^^\ 'asssa on ^y'" january, ^uiu.i H'aard on ^dmlsslon. 2. I" thls petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of Jndia, the petitionsr submits that his application under Sectlon '1S5(S-a) of the Chhsttisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959 (henceforth 'the Code, 1959') see'qng permission to sei' his is pending since 30-12-2005, as fffifl^^f^s^ jp ,,&.nnay|!r^5 P-'l Af^ft;f3rrltnn fn i^^rr petitsoner,r fhgs ^l j ^ ie DrGceeci!"!y. ^o'lecton'Additiona! CoHector, Raigarh, before whom ire pending, has not disposed of ths application of the petitioner til! !a+a 4. ConsiderinQ the 'imited oraver. it is directed that if the Detitioner's ^y <-•"—-•- ll-.-m-'^u J^" ^" JF' t appiication under'Section 165(6-a) of the Code, 1959 with respect to 'ands bearina Khasra No.180/5-'3? 3924 Sa.Ft. and Khasra 1 2-- No. 180/5-^ area 872 Sq.Ft. is stl!l pending, the same shal! be disposed of by the Collector/Additionai Collector, Raigarh withjn a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of this order. 5. It is clear that this Court has not any opinion on the merits of fhe applicaSion of the petitioner, v/hich shal! be dea!t with by the competent authority in accordance with h merits ofthecase. ff of. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition Sd//- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge