IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU WRIT PETITION NO : 24969 of 1995 Between: M.Jagannadham Goud S/o M.Chandra Goud A.P.State Electricity Board, Zaheerabad, Medak District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 A.P.State Eletricity Board, Rep: by its Chairman. 2 D.Ellaiah, Accounts Officer, APSEB, Revenue/Opn. Circle, Secundarabad. 3 G.Sudarshan, Accounts Officer (O & M) VTPS/APSEB, IBRAHIMPATNAM. 4 K.Sanjeeva Rao, Accounts Officer, Revenue/Opn. Circle/APSEB, Kurnool. 5 D.Ambaiah , Accounts Officer, Internal Audit, APSEB, Rajahmundry *Petition against Respondents 3 & 4 is dismissed as per Court Order Dated 5.8.2004. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring that the proceedings issued by the 1st Respondent in B.P.(P& G-SER) Rt.No.205, dt.3-8-1995, is arbitrary, illegal, unreasonable and unconstitutional and grant such other order or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.V.ANAND RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos 1,2 &5: … The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU WRIT PETITION NO : 24969 of 1995 ORDER: When the matter came up for admission on 5.8.2004, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence the matter was posted to 21.9.2004. Since there was no representation on 21.9.2004, the matter was posted to today for dismissal. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ 23rd September, 2004 Nn. Copies to: 1. The Chairman, A.P.State Eletricity Board, Hyderabad. 2. Two C.D. copies.