0 Order with Signature 10.2 -8-200 Office,Noi*sto action. (if any) taken on Order Heard M. N. Raf, leaned counsel for the petitigner and also heard M. A. Moulik, leaned senior counsel for respondent Nos.1, 3, 4, 5 and 6 and M. S.P. Wangdi, leaned Advocate General assisted by Mr. J.B. Pradhan [jl'.;. ` and M. Karma Thil}Iay, leaned Govt. I. `' ; I . Advocates for respondent No.2. At the very i` outset,.Mr. N. Rai, leaned counsel submitted ` )i.!t:-.1 `.:, tliat the. petitioner desires to withdraw this petitioli,,on the ground th.at this Cout has no tepritori`al jurisdi,£tion as the same vests upon tlle Calcutta Hidi Court. M. N. Raf, leaned counsel havd made` a prayer for allowing the writ petitioner .to approagh the appropriate film, i.e` Cfahanoq, Hi.gh C`ourt in tlie matter i wlfroh according to me the prayer is reasonable and aGe[dedingly, the petitioner is at liberty to api}roa,ch tbe appr.OPS,ate Court having jurisdiction in tile mattey and in the meantime, tile statusquo with r?gard±o the related search Order with Signature Office Note as to action (if any) taken on Order and seizure shall be maintained and apart from that,jffyrtherproceedingsinpursuancetothe 0\` related Notification No.PAN/GR-12-M dated 13-11-2000 shall remain suspended. It is further made clear tliat the petitioner shall approach the appropriate forum/Court within two montlis froin today. With tlie above observations, this case is closed as withdrawn with liberty mentioned above. \\ Or. Surj Chief '1Cfr Acting)