IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2374 OF 2006 Nabi Mohammed Khan ... Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr. Prashant Patil for the Petitioner Mr. D.S. Mhaispurkar, APP for the State CORAM : S.B. MHASE, & S.R. SATHE, JJ. DATED : 11 th DECEMBER, 2006 P.C. :- Heard. This is an application for quashing of FIR. However, Mr. Mhaispurkar learned APP states that charge-sheet under MCOC Act has already been filed and therefore, appropriate alternate remedy is available to the accused persons by way of approaching that Court for discharge. Therefore, we refrain to entertain the Petition. Petition is hereby rejected. We quantified fee of the appointed Advocate Prashant Patil at Rs.500/-(Rupees Five Hundred Only). (S.R. SATHE, J.) (S.B. MHASE, J.)