1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.3941 OF 2011. (Pankaj Baburam Sharma Vs. Mineral Exploration Corporation Ltd., Nagpur & others) __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. Shri S.G. Shukla, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri M.D. Samel, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM: B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATE: NOVEMBER 30, 2011. Heard Shri Shukla, Adv. for petitioner and Shri Samel, Adv. for respondent Nos.1 to 3. It is not in dispute that employment with respondents is subject to provisions of Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985. Shri Samel, Adv. therefore, contends that remedy under Section 19 of the said Act is available to the petitioner. Shri Shukla, Adv. states that appeal has been filed. In this situation without recording any finding on the question of pendency of appeal or its effect, we permit the petitioner to approach CAT in the matter. With this liberty, we dispose of the petition. No cost. JUDGE JUDGE NSN