IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32608 of 2010 MD.ARMAN, son of Md. Kalam Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/- 03.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Pirbahore P.S. Case No. 108 of 2010, registered under Sections 399, 402 of I.P.C. and 25 (1-B)a, 26/35 of Arms Act. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in self-statement of the informant no date of preparation of the aforesaid self-statement has been given and the seizure list is said to be prepared on 08.04.2010, whereas memo of arrest contains the date of arrest as 09.04.2010. He further submits that as a matter of fact, neither petitioner was caught at the spot nor anything was recovered from his conscious possession. Although, the report of Sr. Superintendent of Police, Patna dated 23.10.2010 reveals that petitioner carries criminal antecedents of four cases, considering the above stated discrepancies, I think it proper to grant the privilege of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, petitioner, namely, Md. Arman, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-VII, Patna, in connection with Pirbahore P.S. Case No. 108 of 2010 ( Sessions Trial No. 117 of 2010). Ashwini/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)