Crl. Misc. No.M-15500 of 2011 (O&M) ****** Ginder Singh @ Gurwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab Present : Mr. P.P.S. Duggal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Gill, D.A.G., Punjab. Mr. S.K. Arora, Advocate for the complainant. ******* AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case F.I.R. No.82 dated 24.10.2010 registered under Sections 395, 148, 149 IPC and Sections 25, 27, 54 and 59 of the Arms Act at Police Station Kulgarhi District Ferozepur. On 27.05.2011 the following contention was noticed:- “Learned counsel has argued that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and has been sought to be implicated many months after the incident on the statement of the alleged co- accused and there is a divergence of opinion between the two inquiry reports wherein one has stated that the incident stems from a property dispute and in this situation the false implication of the petitioner cannot be ruled out.” Learned Deputy Advocate General on instructions from Head Constable Lakhwinder Singh has accepted these factual assertions though he denied the allegation that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. Crl. Misc. No.M-15500 of 2011 (O&M) -2- Learned counsel for the complainant has argued that a similar petition filed by the co-accused was withdrawn but has also very fairly stated that the co-accused was named in the FIR while the petitioner has not been named in the FIR. In the circumstances, the interim order dated 09.06.2011 is confirmed subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) August 24, 2011 JUDGE ashish