IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5355 of 2004. Pitambar Lal Sharma son of Shri Parmanand Sharma VERSUS The Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur & Others Date Of Order ::: 18/03/2008. Hon'ble Mr. Narendra Kumar Jain J. Mr. Rajnish Gupta, Counsel for the Petitioner Mr. Rakesh Saharan, advocate for Mr. Arun Sharma, Counsel for the J.D.A. Mr. H.V. Nandwana, G.A., for the Municipal Corporation Mr. Deepak Singh Mehta, counsel for the respondent no.4 By the Court : Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition to issue a direction to the respondents to allot the strip of land, in question situated behind Plot No.D-60, Patrakar Colony, Jaipur in favour of the petitioner at the rate of Rs.20/- per square yard in place of Rs.1000/- per square yard, as demanded by the Jaipur Development Authority. During the pendency of the writ petition, the disputed area has now been transferred to the Municipal Corporation, Jaipur and the Municipal Corporation, Jaipur is the competent authority in respect of regularization or allotment of the disputed land. During the pendency of this writ petition, the respondent no.4 also filed an application under Order 1 Rule 10, C.P.C. to allow him to be impleaded, as party, which was allowed by this Court on 02.06.2006 and he was impleaded, as respondent no.4 in the writ petition. During the course of arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that he may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to him to file a detailed representation before the Municipal Council, Jaipur with regard to allotment of the disputed piece of land to the petitioner at the rate of Rs.20/- per square yard. Learned counsel for the respondents opposed the prayer and contended that the petitioner is not in possession of the disputed strip of land, but he is in possession of the same. After considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is allowed. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before the Municipal Corporation, Jaipur for the allotment/regularization of disputed piece of land in his favour. It will be open for the respondent no.4 to file a representation or objection before the Municipal Corporation claiming his own title over the disputed land and for regularization of the same in his favour. Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as respondent no.4, both submit that they may be allowed 15-days time to file representation and the respondent Municipal Corporation may be directed to decide their matter within a period of three-months from the date of filing their representation/objection. The prayer made appears to be reasonable. It is, therefore, directed that in case the petitioner as well as respondent no.4 filed their representation/objection before the Municipal Corporation within a period of 15-days from today, then the Municipal Corporation shall decide their claims within a period of three- months thereafter in accordance with law. There will be no order as to costs. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. ashok/