IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1395 of 2010 SHIVAKANT CHOUDHARY S/O LATE MANGAL CHOUDHARY R/O VILLAGE SUSTA, POLICE STATION SAKRA DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR…………………………PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR. 2. ARUN KUMAR, THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, MUZAFFARPUR………….…OPP.PARTIES 4 07-07-2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner and the opposite party are present. A show cause has been filed on behalf of the State stating that the order of the Court has been complied with by passing the necessary order as contained in Annexure -1 to the show cause, whereby the representation of the petitioner was considered and has been disposed of by a reasoned order. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to leave encashment amount for working during the holidays in terms of the order contained in memo No. 3053 dated 30th of July 1985 as contained in Annexure- 2 (series). The counsel for the petitioner submits that the said fact is recorded in the service and took the counsel for the State to the aforesaid aspect. The matter was discussed in the order disposing of the representation where it was held that the aforesaid order contained in memo No. 3053 on 30th of July, 1985 is contrary and as such petitioner is not entitled to claim for payment in question. Be that as it may, since the order of the Court has been complied with the contempt application need not proceed further and the same is accordingly disposed of. However, it will be however, open for the petitioner to bring to the notice of the authority concerned with regard to any discrepancy in the order within a period of four weeks. S.P. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)