1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 51 of 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 175 OF 2009 Ganesh Wamanrao Pathak ...Versus... State of Maharashtra ................................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................ Mr. S.V. Sirpurkar, Advocate for the applicant, Mr. D.B. Patel, A.P.P. for the non-applicant/State. CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 15.04.2010 1. Seen the report dated 30th March, 2010 submitted by the District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Akola. The learned District Judge has submitted that accused Ganesh Pathak moved an application for seeking adjournment for bringing stay order from the Hon'ble Supreme Court. 2. This Court had already directed the trial Court to dispose of the trial in specified period and the said time limit is over. The trial is unnecessarily being dragged and the applicant is unnecessarily protracting the trial. That does not give a good signal. It is further informed by the learned District 2 Judge that the trial was fixed for recording evidence on 19-1-2010. 3. In view of absence of the stay order from the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the trial Court has waited for reasonable period. Hence, the trial Court is directed to proceed with the trial and complete the same within six months from today and henceforth it need not entertain any such request for adjournment of the trial. 4. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE adgokar