CWP No. 22360 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 22360 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: December 15, 2010 Rajiv Kumar and others .........PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab and another ......RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA Present: Mr. N.K. Banga Advocate, for the petitioner(s). AJAI LAMBA, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel contends that the petitioners are placed at Sr. Nos. 11, 12 and 13 in the waiting list Annexure P-2 in general category for Multi Purpose Health Worker. Although posts were lying vacant and the respondents were obliged to give offer of appointment to the petitioners, the needful has not been done. The petitioners have filed representation Annexure P-4, however, no decision thereon was taken. The petitioners then got a legal notice served on the respondents vide Annexure P-5 dated 01.11.2010, yet no decision has been taken. 2. Learned counsel has drawn the attention of the Court towards Annexure P-8 also to show that the issue of giving appointment to the petitioners is under active consideration. Annexure P-8 is dated 18.11.2010. 3. I am of the opinion that the petitioners in view of the facts and circumstances noted above and the averments made in the petition, are CWP No. 22360 of 2010 2 entitled to a decision on the representation Annexure P-4 and legal notice Annexure P-5. 4. This petition is disposed of with directions to the respondents to take a decision on Annexurs P-4 and P-5 within a period of two months of receipt of certified copy of the order. 15.12.2010 (AJAI LAMBA) shivani JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?