HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR C^NTEMPT CASE (ClNo. 185 of 2009 lArisineout ofW.P.(S).No. 6294 of 20081 PETITIONER 1. Sanjaypuri Goswami, aged about 47 years, Headmaster, s/o Late Shri Keshavpuri Goswami, Pt. Ramdayal Tiwari, Govt. Middle School (B), KHO- KHO Para, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G). 2. Ghana Ram Sinha, aged about 46 years, U.D.T. s/o Shri Latel Ram Sinha.Govt.Hr. Sec. School, Pateva, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G). 3. Hari Krishna Patel, aged about 45 years, U.D.T. s/o Shri Dileshwar Patel, Govt. Hr. Sec. School, Raitum, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G). 4. S.A.H. Rizvi, aged about 42 years, U.D.T. s/oShri S.T.H. Rizvi, Govt. Hr. Sec. School, Pateva, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G). 5. S.S. Chawala, aged about 47 years, U.D.T., s/o Shri K.S. Chawala, Govt. Girls Hr. Sec. School, Shantinagar, Distt. Raipur (C.G). 6. Yadu Nath Sahu, aged about 44 years, U.D.T. s/o Shri Salik Ram Sahu, Govt. Middle School, Bhatgaon, Distt. Raipur (C.G). 7. R.S. Upadhyay, aged about 53 years, U.D.T. s/o Shri Natthu Lal Upadhyay, J.N.P. Hr. Sec. School, Raipur, Distt. Raipur(C.G). 8. Surendra Kumar Bhoi, aged abdut 38 years, U.D.T. s/o Late Shri Iswar Lal Bhoi.Govt.Hr. Sec. Schbol, Raitum, Distt. Mariasamund (C.G). 9. Sahja.de Azaz, aged about 42 years, U.D.T. s/o Shri G. Farukh, Govt. Hr. Sec. School Doudekala, Distt. Raipur (C.G). 10. Raju Jaikab Sahay, aged about 47 years, L.D.T. s/o Shri Rojiriya Sahay, Goyt. Middle School, Kachana, Distt. Raipur(C.G). RESPONDENT Contempt Petition CC') No. 185 of2009 11. Satruhan Prasad Sahu, aged about 48' years, L.D.T. s/o Shri Harilal Sahu, Govt. Middle School Nayapara, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G). 12. Smt. Ramavantin Sahu, aged about 48 years, UiD.T. w/o Shri Satruhan Prasad Sahu, Govt. Girls Hr. Sec. School, Mahasamund, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G). 13. Tarun Kumar Dewangan, aged about 35 years, L.D.T. s/o Shri Narayan Prasad Dewangan, Govt. School Charouda (Dharsiva) Distt. Raipur 14. Bharat Bhushan Verma, aged about 48 years, U.D.T. s/o Shri Baliram Venna, Goyt. Middle School Besik (Arang) Distt. Raipur (C.G). 15. Nandu Lal Sahu, aged about 47 years, Headmaster, s/o Shri Kartik Ram Sahu, Govt. Middle School Arundhati Devi Arang, Distt. Raipur (C.G). 16. Prem Sharikar Sharma, aged about 45 years, P.T.I. s/o Shri Mahadeo Prasad Govt. Girls High School, Arang, Distt. Raipur (C.G). 17. Ved Ram Verma, aged about SOyears, L.D.T. s/o Late Shri Ganesh Ram Verma Girls Middle School Mandir Hasoud, Distt. Raipur (C.G). 18. U.S. Padamwar, aged about 52 years, U.D.T. s/o Shri Rikhi Ram Padamwar, Govt. Girls Hr. Sec. School Arang, Distt. Raipur(C.G). 19. Ram Kumar Verma, aged about 45 years, Headmaster, s/o Shri Churamani Verma, Govt. Navin Middle School Giroud (Dharswiva), Distt. Raipur (C.G).. 20. K.R. Das, aged about 44 years, U.D.T. s/o Shri Resham Lal Das, Govt. College of Education, Shankar Nagar, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G). Persus Nand KumarVerma, Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bh.awan, Raipur (C.G). Contempt Petition ('CTNo. 185 of2009 T~~-. Appearance : Mr. Soinkant Verma, counsel for the Petitioners. ORALORDER t04;11.20091 SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard on admission. The petitioners have filed this petition for initiation of proceedings of contempt against the respondent, Secretary of the School Education Department, who, according to the petitioners, has npt obeyed the order dated 18.3.2009 passed by this Court in W.P(S).No.6294/2008 (Annexure C-l). While disposing of the said Writ PetiUon on 18.3.2009, this Court passed the following order: "Having regard to the facts situation of the case, this petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to inake a detailed representation before the respondent no.l for redressal of their grievances, who, in turn, shall consider and decide the same on its own merits, in accordance with law, in the Ught of -the above stated circular, within a period of six weeks frora the date of the receipt of the representation. No order asto costs." Leamed counsel for the petitioners submits that thereafter the petitioner(s) filed application in proforma vide Annexure C-2 on 28.3.2009 but their applications were not decided by the concemed secretary. A perusal of Annexure C-2 would show that in ia.et, in a proforma, the petitioner(s) have given their details and they do not contain as to what were the grievances of the petitioners and th'ey are making what prayer to the concerned authority of the 'State Government as per order dated 18.03.2009 passed in W.P,(S)-,No. 6294/2Q08. The said application(s) cannot be said to /Rao/ Contemut Petition (QNo. 185 of2009 be fhe detailed representation as directed in the order dated 18.03.2009 passedby this Court. In view of the above, I am not i.nclined to issue notice to the respondent as no detailed representation(s) was filed by the petitioner(s) in compliance ofthe order dated 18.3.2009. This petition for initiadon of the contempt proceedings, therefore, is liable to be dismissed and 1s hereby disn-iissed. HoweVer, the petitioners are free to file detailed representations making their grieyance as per Para 5 of the order dated 18fll ofMarch, 2009 (Annexure C-l). Sd/- SunU Kumar Sinha Judge »„ ~\ ^.k \- ,s.: i^di^^^d