THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.6447 of 2010 Dated:22.03.2010 Between: Smt.Sangi Sujatha. …Petitioner And The District Collector, Adilabad District, And others. ...Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.6447 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner was appointed as temporary Fair Price Shop (FPS) dealer by proceedings of the second respondent dated 29.02.2008 until further orders. The second respondent issued notification dated 09.03.2010 inviting applications for filling up the vacancy of FPS No.22/B, Mandamarri, Mandamarri Mandal, Adilabad District. Assailing the said notification the present writ petition is filed. The petitioner’s Counsel contends that when the petitioner is continuing for the last two years there is no necessity to appoint a regular dealer, and that there was no direction issued to the second respondent by the Government or higher authorities for filling up the vacancies. All the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner are stated only for the purpose of rejection. As noticed supra she was appointed as temporary dealer until further orders. Indeed, a perusal of the appointment order would show that the petitioner requested the Tahsildar, Mandamarri, for temporary dealership. The said Officer made a recommendation to appoint the petitioner on temporary basis until further orders. Therefore, the petitioner has no right that can be enforced by issue of writ of mandamus. However, if the petitioner is continuing as the temporary FPS dealer of Shop No.22/B, Mandamarri, Mandamarri Mandal, Adilabad District, and there are no allegations against her or no suspension orders against her, she shall be continued till a regular dealer is appointed by the second respondent, so that the cardholders attached to the shop would not face any inconvenience. The security deposit made by the petitioner at the time of appointment, if any, as temporary dealer shall be returned to the petitioner by the Revenue Divisional Officer on an application being made by the petitioner within a period of eight weeks after receiving the said application. This Court also observes that second respondent shall complete the selection process as early as possible. The Writ Petition, with the above observations, is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 22.03.2010 vs