-ae—; T ^ST ^WWi, W^WW, fqcll-My 8 *ii*<cfll (|,^K^, •—•••••• •••••• •••—^ 200 sn^r TPRT C^f3«i^) SfTi'i'd 'SRI 'f^fN; WIT SIR^I skliqi 'FRiRR'gftasn^i <M*lT<t<^1 *1l*1<llf ^f fs'<1 <^1^F< ^aiRpran^r MtGH-COORT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Coram: Hon' ble Shiti Dhirendra Mishra, & Hon' ble Shti R.N. Chandrakar^JJ Writ Appeal Appellant Petitioner Respondents Vs. 1. Mo. 2M OF 2009 2. 3. Shiv Kumar Nagarchi, aged about 32 /ears, S/o. R.K. Nagarchi, r/o. Kartala, Tahsil Kartala, District Korba :CG). itate of Chhattisgarh through the iecretary, Health Department, D.K.S. ihawan, Mantralaya, Raipur. 'he Director, Directorate, ;hhattisgarh Health Services, Raipur (CG). Fhe Chief Medical Officer, 3aikunthpur, District Korea (CG). (Appeal under Section 2 (i) ofth^ Chhattisgarh High Court (Appeal to Division Bejich) Act, 2006.) Present: Shri Arvind Kumar Dubey, Shri Vinay Harit, Dy. tounsel for the appellant. Advocfate General for the State. Ora|l Order (Passed on this|21st August, 2009) Per Dhirendra Mishra, J. Heard oh I.A.No.1, for The application is allowed conc|onation of delay in filing the appeal. ^nd delay is condoned.. ^5E[ .<||<fl|ciq, ®tTl+1<l%,IqOiyy \3 I SIT^I^'f?^ "ffsrr s^~^ ^^^ MMWI 9lHI«h •^200 3^I ~a^sK (.'^pp^f) 'TOITWafe'SII^T Tliis wiil ctppyal is diiet;le|J agaiiist tlie uider dated 4iT<ri^fift't T?W?ff^ t^3t ^.^f^R ^ssiRn sd^si z?-a-200& passed in Writ Petition (S) No.4()31 of 2008, whereby learned single [with a finding that the'^etitioner is not Judge has dismissed the petition entitled to any relief, as once th^ contract period Of a candidate has come to an end, the question of ci|)ntinuation of service does not arise. (before learned single Judge was that lician on contract basis for a limited The claim of the petitioner| he was appointed as Lab Techi) period. The period was extend^d from time to time till 31-3-2006. Thereafter, the respondent authoifties declined to extend the same and the representati'Qns ofthe petition^r were not considered. After going through the inn|pugned order, we are of the opinion that the order is based on sound the Supreme Court. There is no same deserves to be and is accor Sd/- Dhu-endra Mishra Judge |)rinciples of law laid down by Hon'ble ^ubstance in this writ appeat and the [fingly dismissed. / :^ Sd.'- R.N. Chandrakar Judge