1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3985 OF 2010 (Smt. Janibai Harlal Rathod vs. The Collector, Yavatmal & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. AUGUST 17, 2010. Heard Shri Dhumale, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Patel, learned AGP for respondents No. 1 & 2. Prima facie it appears that Respondent No. 3 did not disclose details of his conviction in declaration along with nomination paper. He has supplied those details on 11.08.2010 i.e. after scrutiny. However, it is not in dispute that his conviction under Sections 325, 506 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code is for three months only, therefore, the provisions of Section 14(1)(a)(i) & (ii) of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958, are not attracted. Shri Dhumale, learned counsel is further contending that respondent No. 4 has filled in nomination paper as a OBC candidate. The learned AGP states that he can still contest for open post. The elections are scheduled on 22.08.2010, hence I am not inclined to examine all these issues in 2 present writ petition as time left is very short. With liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to appropriate forum after election is over, present writ petition is dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.