IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 1ST OCTOBER 2009 / 9TH ASWINA 1931 RP.No. 763 of 2009(B) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.5853/2009 Dated 04/03/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONERS --------------------------------- 1. FATHIMATH SUHRA, W/O.JAFFERSHEREEF, 25/342(1) DEVI NAGAR COLONY, ABDUL KADER RD., PALAKKAD. 2. SHADIA SHEREEF, D/O.JAFFERSHEREEF, 25/342(1) DEVI NAGAR COLONY, ABDUL KADER ROAD, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN SMT.P.G.BABITHA RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD. 3. SPECIAL TAHASILDAR (LA)(G)I, PALAKKAD. 4. THE PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 5. THE SECRETARY, PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY. SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR(GP) & SRI.CHITAMBARESH (SC) THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/10/2009, ALONG WITH WPC NO. 30020 OF 2008 WPC NO. 29808 OF 2008 WPC NO. 35740 OF 2008 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= R.P. No. 763 of 2009 in W. P (C) No. 5853 of 2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 1st October, 2009. O R D E R This is an application to review my judgment dated 4-3-2009, whereby I dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn on a submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioners now submit that the submission was wrongly made by the advocate without obtaining instruction from the petitioners and in fact in respect of the same acquisition, W.P(C) Nos. 29808 & 30020 of 2008 are pending in which Annexure I interim order has been passed. 2. From Annexure I interim order, I find that this Court had permitted the Section 5A enquiry to be continued and the petitioners in those writ petitions were directed to participate in the Section 5A enquiry. In this case, the petitioners admit that no objection under Section 5A has been filed. However, insofar as two other writ petitions in respect of the same acquisition are pending, I feel that the petitioners should be given another opportunity to present their case in the writ petition. Accordingly, I allow the review petition and recall my judgment dated 4-3-2009. Post the writ petition before the appropriate court along with W.P(C) Nos. 29808 & 30020 of 2008. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.