IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 4007 of 2011 Decided on: 1st June, 2011. Tek Chand Sharma …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Verma, Advocate. For Respondents 1 to 3: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:- i) That the respondents may be directed to consider the case of the petitioner for releasing the grant in aid since 2007 as the petitioner is eligible in all respect to be appointed as PET and is working as such against vacancy and further be directed to give the appointment to the petitioner as PET against the said vacancy. ii) That the respondent No. 3 may further be directed to countersign the experience certificate of the petitioner in accordance with law as has been done in the similarly situated case. iii) That the respondents may further be directed to consider the case of the petitioner and decide the representation of the petitioner which is lying pending since long. 2 2. There will be a direction to the 3rd respondent/competent authority to look into Annexure P-7, representation, filed by the petitioner and take appropriate action thereon in accordance with law within a period of 4 months from the date of production of the copy of this judgment alongwith the copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the 3rd respondent. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 1st June, 2011. (Justice V.K. Sharma), (tr/K) Judge. 3