IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE REVIEW PETITION ST.NO.3564 OF 2006 IN MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.88 OF 2005 Paras Madhukar Patil (Jain). ...Applicant. Vs. Mrs.Archana Paras Patil. ...Respondent. ..... Mr.Sachin V. Dhakephalkar for the Applicant. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. September 8, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. : Upon the delay being condoned, the Review Petition with the consent of Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant and at his request is taken on Board and is called out. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant undertakes to get the Review Petition numbered during the course of the day. When the order of this Court was passed on 21st December 2005, the Review Petitioner was admittedly served. The order has been passed on merits. No case for review is made out. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Review Petitioner has only submitted in the course of the hearing that the Petition which is pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division at Malegaon may be expedited. It would be open to the Applicant to move the Learned Trial Judge for expedited disposal of the petition. In the event that such an application is made, the Learned Trial Judge shall consider the request for expeditious disposal after notice to the Respondent. The Review Petition is accordingly disposed of. ....