$mgae Bgnch IN THE HON BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (c G} m7? * w.P. s No.3)? I .B. PET‘ITIONER : D.S. Ka‘shyap, (Dhansay Kashyap) vS/o Late Shri Sonadhar Kashyap . t r aged ‘about 62‘ years, ' Retired Assistapt Teacher, (Tribal Weifare Department) R/o Tokapal, Tahsil—' JagdaIQur Distt. Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS RESPdNDENTs a : 1./ State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Tribal Weifare Department, D.K.S.‘ , \‘» Bhawan Raipur Distt, Raipur‘ (C.G.) 2 i 2./The Commissioner, Scheduie Tribe, and Scheduie ‘ Caste, DeveIOpment ' Chhattisgarh, Raipur'(C.G.) 3./The Assistant Commissioner Tribal Weifare Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) ‘ 4.“ The Block Education Offibe'ri i Tokapai, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) M“ 5. The Accountant Genera’L Chaatisgarh 'Pandri, Raipur: /(C.G.‘) £6. The Senior Accounts Ofncer,3 \2 ‘ /.J i @x © 'NI'dhi-6, Office of the Aacountant General, Chhattisgarh Pandri, ‘ Raipur (O.G.) WRITTPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE" CONSTITUTION OF INDIA //’, W'mm WP gs} NO. PETITIONER D.S. Kashyep Sonadhar Assistant R/o Tokapgl, (CG) Versus hESPONDENTS 1. State of Welfare Depa Raipur (CG) 2. The Commissioner, Caste, Develo 3. The Assistant dagdalpur, 4. The Block Bastar (CG) 5. The Accountant Raipur (CG) 6. The Senior Accountant (CG) Writ Petition under Article 2 317 OF 2009 (Dhansay Kashyap) S/o Lata Shn' Kashyap aged about 62 years, Retired Tracher, (Tribal Welfare Department) Tahsil Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Tn'bal ."tment, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. , Schedule Tribe and Schedule pment Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG) Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Distt. Bastar (CG) Education OCcer, Tokapal, Dist. General Chhattisgarh Pandri, Accounts Oilicer, Nidhi—6 Office of the General, Chhattisgarh Pandri, Raipur of the Constitution of India $.B Hon’ble Shri Dhirendra Mis a, J counsel for the petitioner. far the State. Asst. Solicitor General for the 21.1,2009 Mr. Subhash Yadav, learned Mrs. Smita Ghai, learned PL Ms. Sharmila Singhai, learned respondents No. 5 8a 6. Heard. mm 7mm (Wu) Immm L W xssistant Teacher in Govt. Higher kpartnmnt), Tokapal and retirad iowever, even after more than one mount of GPF has not been disbur Leaxned counsel for the peti " he petitioner may be referred XI-HC—78 g wuoo amtmw wmm yithin a period of 3 days, the sax office to the High ' Power Retira] Committee shall decide grievance 01 nonths fmm the date of receipt of n In View of above submissions with a direction to the petitioner to vith annexures in the office of Advo 3 days from today, Who, in turn, s >ower' Committee for Retiral Dues shall decide the dispute Within a f he date of receipt of copy of this o from the office of Advocate Gene: l s 1 l learing to the petitioner. immewm : $Wm tnCI‘ IS Elia: E6 Was WOI‘Kilig as ‘Miw Secondary School (Tribal Welfare nom his services on 30.112007. year of his retirement, the eniire ‘sed to the petitioner till date. ner submits that the grievance of o the High Power Retiral Dues iommittee, constituted by the Sta e as per directions of this Court, Vith a further direction to decide rievance of the petitioner Within a pecifled period. submits that in case the petitioner Learned counsel for the State m Lubmits copy of this petition along with annexures in the office of AG. 1e shall be forwarded by the A.G. Dues Committee and the said ‘ the petitioner within a period of 4 :ference. , the instant petition is disposed of submit a copy of this petition along :ate General (CG) within a period of hall forward the same to the High forthwith and the said Committee lirther period of four months from rder along with copy of the petition ."al, after affording opportunity of ‘ Sd/— Dhire'ndra Mishra ‘ (mm ' Judge PH” \ WW. o