CWP No. 6816 of 2010 08.7.2011 Present: Mr. H. K. Paul, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P. M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General for the respondents. It is seen that in the revision petition petitioner had taken plea of quantum of penalty being harsh, disproportionate and in excess which undisputedly has not been considered by the Revisional Authority in its order dated 17.6.2010. Petitioner submits that the Revisional Authority has also not taken into account various decisions of the Apex Court and other Courts of the country while passing order dated 17.6.2010. It is open for the petitioner to approach the Revisional Authority clearly pointing out all these aspects and also annexing materials in support of his contentions. This he may do within a period of four weeks from today. It is expected of the Revisional Authority to advert to and after taking into account the material placed by the petitioner pass a reasoned order on these aspects of the matter. Needless to add the Revisional Authority shall take into account the past service and age of the petitioner while arriving at its decision. 2. With these observations present petition stands disposed of. Copy dasti. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. July 8, 2011 (PK)