CRM-M No.8292 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.8292 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 28.09.2011 Manishwar Kaur ...... Petitioner v. U.T., Chandigarh ...... Respondent *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Rishi Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Ashima Mor, Standing counsel for U.T., Chandigarh. Mr. R.K. Chugh, Advocate for the complainant. *** AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case F.I.R. No.66 dated 19.02.2010 registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC at Police Station Sector 17, Chandigarh. On 19.03.2010 the following order was passed:- “Argues that present FIR is a result of CRM-M No.8292 of 2010 (O&M) -2- matrimonial discord between the petitioner and complainant as they are husband and wife and were together partners in the firm which already stood dissolved. Notice of motion for 29.04.2010. However, petitioner is directed to join the investigation and in case she is arrested, she shall be released on interim bail by the Arresting Officer to his satisfaction subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.” Learned counsel for the complainant has argued that the petitioner forged the signature of her husband in fabricating a false dissolution deed and she has misappropriated the assets of the Firm and impoverished the complainant. Be that as it may, it is not disputed that the petitioner has repeatedly joined the investigation. It is obvious if the petitioner is found guilty of an offence she would be liable to undergo whatever punishment imposed upon her. At this stage, I see no reason to vacate the above mentioned order. In the circumstances, the interim order dated 19.03.2010 is confirmed subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) September 28, 2011 JUDGE ashish