IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DECEMBER 2008 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 33684 of 2008(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- RADHIKA.P.T, W/O.T.K.JAYAKRISHNAN, AGED 33 YEARS, HSA(MATHS), GHSS ERUMAPPETTI, THRISSUR. NOW RESIDING AT THATTANPARAMBIL HOUSE, MOORKANIKARA, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.C.A.CHACKO SMT.C.M.CHARISMA SRI.N.A.SHAFEEK RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THRISSUR. 2. THE HEADMISTRESS, GHSS ERUMAPPETTI, THRISSUR. 3. HENCY LOUISE, HSA(MATHS),GHS PEECHI, THRISSUR DISTRICT. SHRI.A.J.VARGHESE, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------- W.P.(C) No.33684 OF 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of December, 2008 J U D G M E N T The petitioner submits that she is an HSA in GHSS, Erumappetti, Thrissur. According to her, by submitting Ext.P3 application she sought transfer to a school near to Peechi. Since there was no consideration of her request, she made Ext.P4 representation to the 1st respondent. Neither on Ext.P3, nor on Ext.P4 was there any response. While so, the 3rd respondent was posted at Peechi as per Ext.P5. The petitioner complains that the posting of the 3rd respondent by Ext.P5 is ignoring her superior claims. 2. As already noticed, the claim of the petitioner is for transfer to one of the schools in Peechi, and according to the petitioner, the claim made by Exts.P3 and P4 has not been considered. Complaint being the above, I direct the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P3 and P4, provided these are still pending without orders, within eight WP(C) No.33684/2008 -2- weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. 3. The petitioner shall produce produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the 1st respondent for compliance. Before final orders are passed, notice shall be given to the petitioner, and if necessary to the 3rd respondent also. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg