S.B. CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.162/2006 Kamlesh Shrimali Vs. Jagdish Chandra & Ors. Date of order : 24th November, 2008 PRESENT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. Manoj Joshi for the petitioner. Mr. Suresh Shrimali for the respondents. --------- 1. Mr. Suresh Shrimali submits that after amendment in the C.P.C. in Section 115 w.e.f. 1.7.2002 the present revision petition is not maintainable in view of the Supreme Court decision in case of Shiv Shakti Agro Loop Society Ltd. Nagpur Vs. M/s Swaraj Developers 2003(2) DNJ 353. He submits that the application to become party under Order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C. was rejected by the learned trial court by the impugned order and that if it would have been decided in favour of the petitioner then it would not have finally terminated the proceedings or suit and, therefore, the present revision petition is not maintainable. 2. Having heard learned counsels, this Court finds force in the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents. This revision petition is, therefore, dismissed as not maintainable with liberty to the petitioner to avail any other appropriate legal remedy. [ DR. VINEET KOTHARI ], J. item No.5 babulal/-