1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3095 OF 2008 Manik s/o Raoji Gaikwad ..APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Mah. & ors. ..RESPONDENTS Mr M.P. Kale, Advocate for the applicant; Mr S.V. Kurundkar, A.P.P. for respondents no.1 & 2; Mr S.S. Rathi, Advocate for respondents no.3 & 4. CORAM : P.V. HARDAS, J. DATE : 27th November, 2009 PER COURT : The applicant herein is the original complainant who had complained of the various offences and on the basis of whose complaint an offence punishable under section 353, 323, 504, 506 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and the offences punishable under the Atrocities Act and the Protection of Civil Rights Act came to be registered. By this application the applicant challenges the order passed by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani, dated 27.8.2008 granting anticipatory bail to the respondents herein . Mr Rathi, learned Counsel for the respondents states that a charge-sheet has been filed against the present respondents and the present respondents have 2 obtained regular bail from the Court. In that light of the matter, therefore, the challenge to the order granting anticipatory bail to the respondents no longer survives and application is accordingly dismissed. ( P.V.HARDAS, J.) amj/criap3095.08