: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.200 OF 2005 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.894 OF 2004 1. Popat Krishna Pawar & Ors. .. Applicants (Orig. Appellants) Versus 1. Balkrishna Namdeo Patil & Ors. Respondents (Orig. Respondents) Ms.Gauri Godsle for Applicants. Mr.G.S.Godbole for Respondents CORAM : P.V.KAKADE, J. DATE : 15TH FEBRUARY, 2005. P.C.: . Heard the learned counsel for both the parties. 2. This is an application for extension of the order of status-quo passed on 14.12.2004 and corrected on 18.1.2005 in Second Appeal No.894 of 2004. 3. The learned counsel for the applicants submits that she had already filed an Appeal in the Supreme Court, however, the lower court has fixed today the execution of the decree and therefore, the status quo is required to be maintained. The learned counsel for the : 2 : Respondents vehemently objects to further extension on various grounds. However, in the interest of justice I am inclined to grant extension of status so far as execution of the decree is concerned. Hence the application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). The status-quo order passed earlier stands extended by further four weeks, if the decree is not already executed as on today. With this order the application stands disposed of with no order as to costs. *****