CWP No. 303 of 2006 20.6.2008 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Thakur,vice counsel for the Petitioner. Mr.K.B. Khajuria, Centrla Govt. Standing counsel for the respondents. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Respondents have filed response, which indicates on the rejection of first appeal on June 20, 2006 in respect of the claim of petitioner regarding disability pension, the petitioner was advised by the respondents to prefer second appeal to the Defence Minister’s Appellate Committee. In view of such development, if petitioner had already moved second appeal and a decision has been taken thereon then against that order, petitioner may approach for appropriate remedy, if so advised. If the petitioner has not moved second appeal, then if advised, the petitioner is liberty to approach appropriate forum for relief by preferring second appeal in accordance with the provisions available to him. However, no relief could be given to the petitioner at this stage. In view of such development, the writ petition is disposed of accordingly. ( R.B. Misra ),J. ( Sanjay Karol ), J. 20th June, 2008 (sl)