IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH JULY 2009 / 17TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 19173 of 2009(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.J.MOHANAN,PRESIDENT OF THE SUPERCEDED MANAGING COMMITTEE OF THE NETHAJI KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGAM (LTD),NO.A.86(D)APCOS, VADAKKANARYAD.P.O,ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.V.G.ARUN SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR,DAIRY DEVELOPMENT, ALAPPUZHA. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.C. SANTHOSHKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- W.P.(C).No.19173 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 8th day of July, 2009. JUDGMENT President of a Co-operative Society is the petitioner herein. It is stated that he assumed charge on 17.9.2007. They were issued Ext.P4 notice under Section 32(1) of the Co-operative Societies Act. That was challenged before this court in WP(c).No.15686/08. The writ petition was allowed by Ext.P5 judgment setting aside Ext.P4 and other proceedings initiated under Section 32 of the Act. 2. It is stated that, thereafter again relying on the very same allegations, fresh proceedings have been initiated and Ext.P8 show cause notice was issued to which Ext.P9 reply was given. Thereafter, they were again issued Ext.P6, with the very same allegations and Ext.P7 explanation has been submitted. On its receipt, the respondent has been issued Ext.P10 notice calling upon WP(c).No19173/09 /2/ the petitioner to appear for a personal hearing on 8.7.2009. It is at this stage challenging the notice referred to above this writ petition is filed. Counsel mainly contends that Ext.P6 notice is absolutely illegal and the issue is covered by Ext.P5 judgment and no new allegations have been brought out for the fresh notice issued. In my view, now that petitioner have been called for a personal hearing, it is up to the petitioner to raise their objections before the respondent himself and it is for the respondent to consider those objections and pass final order in the matter. Therefore leaving open the contentions raised this writ petition is closed. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WP(c).No19173/09 /2/