IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND DECEMBER 2010 / 1ST POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 36786 of 2010(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- ARUN GOPI, LALATHU THAZHATHEL, THIRUVANCHOOR.P.O, KOTTAYAM - 686 637. BY ADV. SRI.LIJI.J.VADAKEDOM RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. DIRECTOR OF AYURVEDIC MEDICAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, DIRECTORATE OF AYURVEDIC MEDICAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -1. 2. COMMISSIONER OF ENTRANCE EXAMINATION, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF ENTRANCE EXAMINATION - 2010, SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 1. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 36786 OF 2010 ===================== Dated this the 22nd day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T According to the petitioner, in the Medical Entrance Examination 2010, he secured Rank No.6324. He did not succeed in getting any admission, and apparently for that reason, he joined a college in Bangalore for BAMS Course. 2. Subsequently when Ext.P4 was issued announcing spot admissions, petitioner applied. However, when he appeared for the selection process, for the reason that certificates were submitted in the college where he was admitted, he could not produce the original certificates. It is stated that for want of the originals, he was not permitted to participate in the selection process and therefore this writ petition has been filed seeking appropriate orders directing that he should be granted admission. 3. Learned Government Pleader, who has obtained instructions in the matter submits that it was a condition of Ext.P4 notification that the candidates should produce the originals of their certificates as also the entrance data sheet, which indicate the rank of the candidate. It is stated that several candidates WPC No.36786/10 :2 : including the petitioner who did not produce such records were refused permission to participate in the selection process. It is stated that from among those who produced the documents, selection was held and those eligible were granted admission. 4. Admittedly, the petitioner did not produce the original documents which were mandatorily required to be produced by the candidates. If that be so, the respondents cannot be faulted if the petitioner was not permitted to participate in the selection process. Since it is now disclosed that several candidates, who had superior ranking than the petitioner were also declined such permission, I see no reason to show any particular indulgence to the petitioner. Writ petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp