IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 4446 of 2011 Date of decision: 25.7.2011 Bagga Ram … Petitioner versus Buta Ram … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mr. R.K.Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner ... ARVIND KUMAR, J: A suit for declaration titled Sarwan Singh v. Buta Ram was decreed on 20.8.2001. During execution, the present petitioner, Bagga Ram, filed objections stating that he is in cultivating possession of Khasra No. 1000/10 min for the last 30/35 years, which is a part of the decree and as such, his interest is directly involved in the execution and thus, he be made a necessary party in the execution. The application has been dismissed vide impugned order dated 16.5.2011 passed by the Additional Civil Judge(Sr.Division), Nakodar. Hence, this revision. Heard. A bare perusal of the impugned order indicates that the jamabandi of the disputed property shows that the land in possession of Bagga Ram is different from the land in respect of which the present execution application has been filed. This is otherwise apparent from Annexures P-3 and P-4 indicating that Khewat/Khata numbers of Bagga Ram are different from Buta Ram. There is no infirmity in the impugned order. No interference is called for. The revision petition is dismissed. July 25, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) JS JUDGE