1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.110 OF 2009 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 990 OF 2006 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 466 OF 2004 M/s. Jaico Investments. .. Review Petitioner Vs Akhil Dalal ... Respondent Mr. Ashish Kamat with Mr. Ashok Purohit i/b Purohit & Co. for the petitioner. Ms. Sonal i/b A.K. Bakshi for the respondent. CORAM: S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 14TH DECEMBER, 2009. P.C.: 1. No review is called for despite the fact that when the order sought to be reviewed was passed, the respondent’s counsel was not aware that the appeal had been dismissed for default. Subsequently, an application for restoration was taken out. Mr. Kamat, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks an extension of the date permitting withdrawal to enable the 2 Petitioner/original Respondent to make an application for stay before the appeal court. In the circumstances, the date fixed on 15th December, 2009 in the said order dated 13th November, 2009 is extended upto and including 8th January, 2010. 2. The Review Application is, accordingly, disposed of.