IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Contempt Petition No.39 of 2009 1. M. N. Dimri, S/o Kanti Ballabh Dimri, Village-Jawahar Nagar, Post Office-Nagla Dairy Farm, District Udham Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand. 2. G.D. Deorari, S/o Late K.N. Deorari, Village- Lalpuri , Post Office-Gullarbhoj, District Udham Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand. 3. Ashish Agarwal, S/o Sri R.K. Agarwal, House No.21/28, Kapas Mill Compound, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand. ……Petitioners. Versus Sri B.S. Bisht, Vice Chancellor, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pant Nagar. …….Respondent. Mr. Subhash Upadhyay, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, Senior Advocate with Mr. G.D. Joshi, Advocate for the respondent. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. By means of this contempt petition, the petitioners has prayed to punish the respondent for flouting the order dated 05-05-2008 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 3394 of 2001 (S/S), Km. Sunita Pant and others Vs. Vice Chancellor and others. In the said writ petition, the direction was given to the respondent to take decision on the applications of the petitioners within a period of one month from the date of production of a certified coy of this order. 2 In response, counter affidavit has been filed by the respondent wherein it is stated in para No. 9 to the counter affidavit that the applications of the petitioners were decided by the respondent on 24-03-2009 by speaking order. Since, the order has been complied with, the contempt petition is liable to be dismissed. The same is dismissed. Notices issued against the respondent are hereby discharged. If the petitioners feels aggrieved by the order, which has been passed by the respondent, the petitioners would be at liberty to assail the order before competent forum as provided under the law available to the petitioner. All pending applications stand disposed of accordingly. (B.S.Verma, J.) 16-07-2010 MK