CRM No. M-27054 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-27054 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 28.03.2011 Rohit Michu ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Aditya Madan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Gautam Dutt, Advocate, for the complainant. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.226/10 dated 23.8.2010 under Sections 498A/406/506 of the Indian Penal Code, Police Station Sector 31, Faridabad. This Court vide order dated 15.9.2010 has directed to release the petitioner on interim bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will hand over the keys of the locker to the Investigating Officer within 15 days and Investigating Officer shall go to the bank along with applicant to open the locker. Every article found in the locker shall be taken out after preparing list thereof in the presence of both the parties and articles shall be handed over to the wife/complainant by the Investigating Officer. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that in case petitioner CRM No. M-27054 of 2010 (O&M) -2- fails to open the locker as undertook hereinbefore, his petition may be dismissed. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, on the instructions of ASI Kartar Singh, who is present in the Court, states that petitioner has joined the investigation and in view of the undertaking furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioner, petition may be disposed of making the interim bail order absolute. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, petition is allowed. Order dated 15.9.2010 is made absolute, subject to the conditions mentioned under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. However, it is clarified that if petitioner fails to honour the undertaking furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioner, complainant as well as Investigating Officer shall be at liberty to get the bail cancelled. (Alok Singh) Judge March 28, 2011 R.S.