HIGH COURT OF CHHATT8SGARH ATBILASPUR DiVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRi RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLE SHRI L.C.BHADOO, J. PETITIONER Writ Petition (PIL) (PR) No. 6446 of 2007 ^ffrA- fc/^^/b^ ^' RESPONDENTS 1 5. 6. 7. Ekaram Bhai, S/o Hazi Ishalam Ahamad, aged about 32 years, R/o Gaji Nagar Ward No.1 Birgaon Tahsil Raipur District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Versus State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Revenue, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Aivez Kumar Dewangan, S/o Phool Slngh, aged about 33 years, R/o Trimurty Nagar, Ward No.5, Birgaon Tahsil Raipur District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Smt Dineshwari Dewangan, W/o Shri Aivez Kumar Dewangan, aged about 30 years, R/o Trimurty Nagar, W^rd No.5, Birgaon, Tahsil Raipur Distrtet Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Balmukund Rajput, S/o Shri Raghav Singh, aged about 35 years, R/o Pt Sunder Lal Sharma Ward No.11, Birgaon, Tahsil Raipur District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Collector Raipur District RaEpur (Chhattisgarh) Additional Tehsiidar, Dharsiwan, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Nagar Palika Parishad Birgaon, through its Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Birgaon, Tehsil Dharsiwan, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 'S°) (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutlon of India) '^- Present : Shri Bhupendra Singh, counsel for the petitioner. Shri MPS Bhatia, Dy Govt Advocate for the State/ respondents No.1, 5 & 6. ORDER (15tnFebruary,2008) The foliowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, CJ. Learned counsel for the parties are heard on admission. 2) PetitSoner Ekaram Bhai has filed this writ petltion styled as Public Interest Litigation (PIL) for the following reiiefs : "7.1 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent No.1 , 5, 6& 7to conduct enquiry pertaining to encroachment over Govemment Land and construction on it in Municipat area Birgaon by respondent No.2, 3 and 4 and also by other person and take immediate action Sn accordance with law to protsct the subject matter (The Government Land) 7.2 Any other reiief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper may also be granted to the petitioner looking to the facts and circumstance of the case." 3) During the course of hearing, it transpired that petitioner Ekaram Bhai Is Councillor of Municipa! Council, Birgaon whereof respondent No.3 - Dineshwari Dewangan is also Councillor. The text and tenor of the wrst petltion when examined in the context of the above mentioned fact makes it apparent that the petitioner has filed this writ petition styled as PIL with a view to ® V '^ padma settle his persona! score with respondent No.3 - Dtneshwari Dewangan. 4) In our opinion, such disputes are not to be entertained as P!L. 5) The writ petitlon, therefore, is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed summarily. - „___._„-_^ Sd/- . Chief Justice Sd/- L.C.BHADOO Judge