^^u^-h--:CL~^3^.:i'. CL'^t- -^•i-1-•^.'^*LT/'^.-~-v-v-^T-^yT--\)^.'i_~--\,-t.-i,'u-t.-^~i_- .if.'.ft" e RFM'r istw. c .F-1 f> ^ IN THE HIGH COURTOF CHHATTiSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (227) N0. ^^<7^? /2008 PETITIONER: "•;'' Y Smt. She»talDaga, W/o Shri Anand Daga, ^g-^4 - aM-^'^.S't' R/o South End Park, KolKata, (W.B.), Through Special Attorney Kamal Rathi, S/Q Shri Surajmal Rafhi, R/o H-5, Anupam Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: DEFENDANTS 1y ,^ > p- 3. (2- 4. 5. Girijanand Singh, S/o Hira Singh Chandrakar, R/o Kasardih, Nav-Durga CUbwk, DurgfC.G.) RamavatarAgrawal, S/o Nanhemal Agrawal, R/o Choubey Colony, Raipur (C.G.) Satyabala Agrawal, W/o Ramavatar Agrawal, R/o Cfaoubey Colony, Raipur (C.G.) Ram Vishal Kurmi, S/o Chandulal Kurmi, R/oViUage-Rakhi, Tahsil-Arang, Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.) State ofChhattisgarh, Through Collector, Raipur (C.G.) 6. Deputy Manager (Land), New Raipur Development Authority, ft> Mantralaya, Near Mahanadi Gate, RaipurfC.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDMlAR3TCLE227J^^&JBrI3W-AIWICLI&226!OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FORISSUANCEOF WRIT IN NAfURE OF CERnORARIANDOTHERSmTABLEWRITORWRITS. ' DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. ORDBR OR ORDERS: HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (227) No. 6653/2008 PETITIONER Smt. Sheetal Daga Versus •^' RESPONDENTS Girijanand Singh and others SB:- HON'BLE SHRI N.K. AGARWAL, J PRESENT:- Shri Ashish Shrivastava,Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri Raja Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents No. 2 & 3. Shri Raghvendra Pradhan with Smt. Shashi Bareth, Adv. for the respondent No. 4. Shri G.D. Waswani, Govt. Adv. for the respondent No. 5 Shri Rakesh Dubey, Advocate, for respondent No. 6. None appears for respondent No. 1. ORAL ORDER (24-1-2011) 1. In the light of the fact that the land has already been transferred in favour of New R.D.A. and compensation amount has been paid to respondents No. 2 and 3, Shri Ashish Shrivastava, leamed counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to file an application for amendment regarding incorporation of subsequent events took place during the pendency of his injunction application. 2. Liberty, as prayed, is granted. 3. With the aforesaid liberty, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn. It is directed that if such aniendment application is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be decided by the trial court inaccordance with law. Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge