IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6382 of 2009 Rajeev Kumar Singh S/O Shayam Sundar Pd. Singh @ Shayam Sunder Singh, R/V Fatehpur(Naya Tola), P.S. Musharigharari, District- Samastipur. ------Petitioner. -Versus- The State of Bihar…………………………..Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 20.02.2009. Petitioner could not be allowed the benefit of the order dated 17.12.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 47434 of 2008, Annexure-1 as in terms of the said order when the verification of his antecedent was made he was found accused in another case for the offence under Sections 395 and 397 of the Penal Code. It is submitted on his behalf that besides the present case and the other case under Sections 395 and 397 of the Penal Code he is not accused in any other case. Let the court below verify the aforesaid submissions that besides the present case and other case registered for offence under Sections 395 and 397 of the Penal Code he is not accused in any other cases and if correct then the petitioner Rajeev Kumar Singh be allowed the benefit of bail granted in terms of the order dated 17.12.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 47434 of 2008. This application is accordingly disposed of. Let this order be communicated to the C.J.M., Samastipur in connection with Tajpur P. S. Case No. 60 of 2008 through fax on payment of usual charges by the petitioner. U.K. (V.N.Sinha,J)