1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6502 OF 2007 Sulbha Pradeep Gadekar. ...Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents. --- Mr.P.N.Patil, for the Petitioner. Mr.C.R.Sonawane, AGP for Respondents. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & V.M.KANADE, JJ. DATED: 20th December,2007. P.C.:- Heard the learned Counsel appearing for petitioner. The scrutiny committee has given reasons for the validity of the caste claim of the respondent no.5. The petitioner is totally a stranger. It is not the case that the respondent no.5 has produced any fraudulent document. In our 2 opinion, it will not be appropriate to interfere with the order in the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petition is therefore, rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (V.M.KANADE,J.) ---