THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23803 of 2010 Date:27.09.2010 Between: Md. Yousuf Khan and another ..... Petitioner AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by Chief Secretary and another. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Shaik Jilani Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5 to 10: Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue Counsel for Respondent Nos.4, 11 to 16: -- The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents authorities in threatening to dispossess the petitioners from the land in Sy.Nos.1 to 89 and 92 to 200 admeasuring more than 1500 Acres of land i.e., this land is one thousand Bigas, Five Saswa, One thousand Five Hundred Bigas, Eight Hundred Baam, the record is available 1435 Fasli, Mansoorabad, Masjid-e-Qutub Shahi, Jagir Inaam is under the Maqta Masjid situated at different Villages i.e., Village Marrepalli, Tatti Khana, Tatti Annaram, Mansoorabad, these villages are under the Taluqa Tahsil Nalgonda, Atraf Balda now in Ranga Reddy District which is ancestral properties of the petitioners without issuing any notice and without following the due process of law as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents No.9and 10 herein to issue the pattedar Passbooks and title deeds to the petitioners in respect of the Sy.Nos.1 to89 and 92 to 200 admeasuring more than 1500 Acres of land i.e., this land is one thousand Bigas, Five Saswa, One thousand Five Hundred Bigas, Eight Hundred Baam, therecord is available 1435 Fasli, Mansoorabad, Masjid-e-Qutub Shahi, Jagir Inaam is under the Maqta Masjid situated at different Villages i.e., Village Marrepalli, Tatti Khana, Tatti Annaram, Mansoorabad, these villages are under the Taluqa Tahsil Nalgonda, Atraf Balda now in Ranga Reddy District and to pass such other order.....” After arguing the case for sometime, Sri Shaik Jilani, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy including civil suit. The request of the learned counsel for the petitioners is accepted. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.30455 of 2010 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 27th September, 2010 GHN