IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1648 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO.3242 OF 1986 Maharashtra State Electricity Board ..... Plaintiffs V/s. India Fruits Pvt. Ltd. ..... Defendants And Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Company Ltd. .... Applicant Mr.K.H.Mody i/by Little & Co., for the plaintiffs. Mr.Pankaj Kowli i/by Pandey & Poonawala, for the defendants. CORAM: R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED: 30TH JANUARY, 2009. P.C. 1. Not on board. By consent, taken on board and taken up for final hearing. 2. By this chamber summons, the applicants want that they be added as plaintiff No.2 in the wake of developments as set out in the affidavit in support and they also want that the plaint should be amended as set out in the Schedule. The learned counsel for the defendants has no objection for grant of the chamber summons as the amendment sought are consequential on account of some changes in the structure of the original plaintiffs. Hence, I pass the following order. 2 : O R D E R : 1. The chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 2. Applicants to amend the plaint in terms of Schedule on or before 21-02-2009. Serve upon Advocate for the defendants amended copy of the plaint on or before 27-02-2009. 3. Pending Notices of Motion No.3809 of 2008 and 4354 of 2008 stand adjourned to 13-03-2009. 4. Applicant is also permitted to amend the Notices of Motion keeping in view the necessary amendment in the plaint. Such liberty is granted to them, though there is no specific prayer in the chamber summons. The defendants are also permitted to amend their notices of motion to bring on record correct name of the parties. ( R.Y.GANOO, J. )