IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30555 of 2010 PAWAN KUMAR UPADHYA SON OF SRI SUNIL KUMAR UPADHYA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 25.8.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Considering that the petitioner, who was initially the informant of the case, was subsequently implicated on account of some circumstantial evidence that had been collected during investigation pointing towards his complicity in the matter as also that he gave confessional statement before the police admitting that he had contracted the co-accused to kill the deceased to siphon off the money of the deceased, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial in view of the serious nature of the offence. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )