HIGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARH.BII.ASPUR CONTEMPTCASE(G) N0.1(^2009 PETnTONER RESPONDENTS Pradeep KumarArya, aged about 28 years, S/o N,R. Arya, R/o Indersen Nagar, 27 Kholi, Bjlaspur Versus 1 M.R. Thakur, Director, High Levet Gaste Scrutiny, Adim Jat Anusandhan Evam Prashikshan Sansthan, Pt. Ravi Shanker Shukla University Campus,Raipur. 2 Dr. T.K. Vaishnav, Member and Director, High Level Caste Serutiny, Adim Jati Anusancthan Evam Prashikshan Sansthan, Pt.| Ravi Shanker ShuWa Uniyersity Campus, Raipur GONTEMPT PETITION UNDER SECTION 120F THE CONT6MFTOF GOURT ACT Appearance: . : : . . Mr. Parag btotecha.iCounselforthepetitioner. Npne forthe resppndents, thaugh the reply has been fited6na3.02;2009. ORALORDER (27,04.2010) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitionersybmits that the petitioner appeared before the High Level Caste Scrutiny Committeeon 23.12.2008,as perQrderdated 19.12.2008 passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No.6712/2008, but the Committee did not dispose of the matterwithin 2 weeks, as directedintheabovementioneclwritpetition. Theorder shegts laefore-the Committee have n^ beenfiledbeforethisCourt,therefore,thisCourtisuhayieto find as to what wa&ihe reason, due to whteh the matter of CONTEMPTCASE (C) N0.10/200^ "^ shyna ~1 the petitioner was not disposed of within the stipulated period granted bythis Court inW.P.(S) No.6712/2008. Even learned counsel forthe petitioner is not in a position to point out the reasons for its delay in disposal. However, learned counsel submits that the matter of the petitioner has been disposed of bythe Committee on 25hofMay2009. .Since the matter has atready been disposed of before the Committee, though there is some delay in disposal ofthe same,! do notdeem it appropriate to proceed furtherin thematter. Inview ofthe above, the proceedings of contempt are dropped at this stage. Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge '•\ ^: s<. '"-'^' A-