IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No. 3784 of 2010(O&M) Date of decision : October 11, 2010 Maya Chand ....Appellant versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal Present : Mr. Ramesh Hooda, Advocate, for the appellant L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral) CM No. 11245.C of 2010 For reasons mentioned in the application which is accompanied by affidavit, delay of 6 days in refiling the appeal is condoned. RSA No. 3784 of 2010 Learned counsel for the appellant contended that the appellant had moved application for additional evidence in the lower appellate court to produce copy of order dated 11.2.1954 passed by the Consolidation Officer but the said application has been erroneously dismissed by the lower appellate court. After having sought instructions, learned counsel for the appellant states that even now copy of order dated 11.2.1954 of the Consolidation Officer is not available. Consequently, aforesaid contention carries no weight. Regular Second Appeal No. 3784 of 2010(O&M) -2- Heard. For reasons detailed in order dated 24.9.2010 passed in RSA No. 3781, titled Maya Chand versus Gram Panchayat, Rurki and others , the instant second appeal is dismissed in limine. ( L.N. Mittal ) October 11, 2010 Judge 'dalbir'