IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37636 of 2008 AJAY YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 7.1.2009 Heard Mr. Ashok Kr. Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. How a majority caste could subjugate a minority and manuscule population of the State could be illustratively appreciated after going through the F.I.R. of this case. Poor carpenters, who were earning their livelihood through carpentry, were asked to pay up, else to wind up; else to reap the consequences which could be firing a shot, as alleged against the petitioner, upon innocent carpenters. The contention is that the petitioner has already served incarceration for about two and a half years in a case under sections 387 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. It is not the offence that appears important to me. The very social condition and the fact as to how criminality, by and by, is eating up the social peace and harmony so as to replace it by lawlessness is the gist of the offence. As such, the petition is dismissed. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )