IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16683 of 2010 SHAMBHU SINGH SON OF RAMADHAR SINGHY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DUBHAL, POLICE STATION MAGADH MEDICAL COLLEGE, GAYA DISTRICT – GAYA Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. BAIKUNTH MISHRA SON OF LATE DINESHWAR MISHRA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHAPUK, P.S. GOH, DISTRICT AURANGABAD, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT BALJORI BIGHA NEAR KATARI HILL ROAD NEAR IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT P.S. CHANDAUTI, DISTRICT GAYA. ----------- 02. 21.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The offence alleged is under sections 406 419, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is that he impressed upon the Opposite Party no. 2 to take a land from his father. The same was executed as there was no defect in title. Later on, father of the petitioner executed the sale deed in question to the second party who is creating the trouble. It is further submitted that father of the petitioner who is alleged to have executed the sale deed, has been allowed bail by order dated 10.05.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 10710 of 2010 certified copy of the order which is produced by the petitioner is kept on record. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is 2 directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Gaya in connection with Complaint Case No. 1040 of 2007 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)