CWP No.1558 of 1992.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.1558 of 1992 Date of Decision: 07.04.2010 **** Sat Pal Kochhar and others . . . . Petitioners VS. State of Punjab and anothers . . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. P.K. Goklaney, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Charu Tuli, Sr. DAG, Punjab ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioners are retired Masters/Mistresses who were working in various privately-managed Government-aided recognised schools in the State of Punjab. They seek a mandamus to direct the respondents to consider the services rendered by them in privately-managed Government-aided recognized Schools for the purposes of pension, Proficiency Step- up, Senior/Selection Grades etc. on the analogy of the teachers working in the Government Schools. (2). Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the issues involved in this writ petition are squarely covered by a decision of this Court dated 10.03.2010 CWP No.1558 of 1992.doc - 2 – rendered in CWP No.14238 of 1991 titled as Sukhdev Singh and others v. State of Punjab and others. (3). Ordered accordingly. (4). The writ petition stands disposed of in terms of Sukhdev Singh’s case (supra). (5). Dasti . (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 07.04.2010 vishal shonkar