:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 136 OF 1992 WRIT PETITION NO. 136 OF 1992 WRIT PETITION NO. 136 OF 1992 Shankar Mahadev Tavdar & Ors. ..Petitioners versus Hindurao S. Jadhav & Anr. ..Respondents Mr. Sandeep Pathak h/f. Mr. A. V. Anturkar for the Petitioners. None for the Respondents. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 9TH OCTOBER, 2006 DATE : 9TH OCTOBER, 2006 DATE : 9TH OCTOBER, 2006 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. I have heard this matter on 21.9.2006 and I started dictating the order. But after going through all the orders, it was found necessary to give time to the counsel for the Petitioners to take instructions from his clients. Today, he states that even though he has written letter to his clients, there are no instructions in the matter. 2. On 25.1.1996 the petition was dismissed against the respondent No.1 as per the court’s order. So far as respondent No.2 is concerned, :2: there is nobody appearing for him. 3. Ad interim relief was granted to the petitioners in terms of prayer clause (b) on 20.1.1993. From the ad interim order, it is clear that the petitioners are continuing to act as Trustees. Even though this petition is pending for the last 13 years, nobody has come with an affidavit complaining about the management by the petitioners, and, therefore, the same order to continue. Hence, the Petition is allowed. Rule is made absolute as prayed. No order as to costs. (D.G. DESHPANDE, J.) (D.G. DESHPANDE, J.) (D.G. DESHPANDE, J.)