IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.222 of 2008 INAMUL HAQUE SON OF LATE MD. YASIN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MADHOPUR, SHEKH TOLI, P.S. TRUKAULIA, DISTRICT EAST CHAMPARAN AT MOTIHARI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY-CUM- COMMISSIONER, HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, EAST CHAMPARAN AT MOTIHARI 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, EAST CHAMPARAN AT MOTIHARI 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, TRUKAULIA BLOCK, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN AT MOTIHARI ----------- 10 18.01.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner, who happens to be the Mukhiya of Madhopur Madhumalat Gram Panchayat, Trukaulia Block, District- East Champaran, Motihari, is accused in Trukaulia P.S. Case No. 115 of 2007 along with the Panchayat Secretary of the said Gram Panchayat and one Iftekhar Alam. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is that co-accused Iftekhar Alam was appointed as a Panchayat Teacher on basis of forged educational certification in connivance/conspiracy of the petitioner and the concerned Panchayat Secretary. It is further submitted that during investigation no material was found against the petitioner in support of the allegation made against him, however charge-sheet has been submitted at the behest of the then Block Development Officer of the said Block who is the informant of the case. Learned counsel for the State submits that the charge-sheet was submitted on basis of the materials available against the petitioner during investigation. Considering the submissions of the parties, since charge-sheet has already been submitted, it will be open for the petitioner to place all his contentions available to him under law at the time of framing of the charge in order to show that charges against the petitioner are groundless. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)