THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B PRAKASH RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE NO. 1734 OF 2000 ORDER: (Per BPR,J) This matter is coming up for quite some time, but there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. However, having regard to the fact that the order complained against is dated 25.2.1997, wherein this Court while allowing the writ petition declared seizure and levy of compounding fee as illegal and further in terms of the interim directions given by this Court dated 8.1.2004, an additional counter affidavit was filed to the effect that Vanasamrakshana Samithi has already been constituted. In these circumstances, we do not find any contempt arising in the matter. Accordingly, the contempt case is dismissed leaving it open to the parties to pursue further remedies if any available under law, if it warrants. No costs. ____________________ B PRAKASH RAO,J __________________ SANJAY KUMAR,J DATE: 07.10.2009 TVK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B PRAKASH RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE NO. 1734 OF 2000 DATE: 7.10.2009