1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1925 OF 2009 ... M/s.Wireless TT Info-Services Ltd. ...Petitioner v/s. The State of Maharashtra & anr...Respondents ... Mr.Hiten S. Venegavkar for the Petitioner. Mr.s.N.Patil AGP for Respondent No.1. Mr.A.A.Gorge for Respondent No.2. ... CORAM: D.K. DESHMUKH & A.R.JOSHI,JJ DATED: 11th March,2010 P.C.:- 1. Rule. Returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties. 2 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the Corporation states that the Corporation has received applications from the Petitioners for regularisation of the towers and that the Corporation will dipose of those applications in accordance with law and as expeditiously as possible, in any case within a period of six weeks from today. Statement is accepted. 3. In view of this statement, the petition is disposed of in following terms: (i)Within a period of one week from today the Petitioner will supply to the Corporation a list of the applications submitted by the Petitioner to the Navi Mumbai Corporation and disclose in that list all details about the applications 3 and towers. (ii)The Corporation shall decide the applications, which are pending with it, as expeditiously as possible, in any case within a period of six weeks from today. (iii)Till the applications are decided the Corporation shall not demolish the towers which are mentioned in the list. (iv)In case the applications are rejected, the Corporation shall not take action to demolish the tower for a period of two weeks from the date of communication of the order rejecting the applications. (v)All contentions available to both sides are kept open. Rule made absolute. No order as to costs. ( D.K. DESHMUKH,J.) ( A.R.JOSHI,J) 4