IN THE HIr{ COURT OF K4R”TAKa T Br’1ICRE Dated this the 16th Day of *prll 19P BEFO R THE HCBLE MR. JUSTICE H.N. NRAYA No,19l99 Between: 1) Kumari 4nitha, Iged atout 15 years, D/o late Sonnapt. 2) Kumari Bhavya, azed about 15 yers, D/o late Sonnapna 3) Kutrari Lavanya, aged about 11 years, D/o late Sonnaopa 4) Kumari Shiloa, aged about 7 years, D/o late Sorropa, 411 are residinc’ at Anarth ur villec’e, Yelahanka Uoblj, Bangalore North Taluk, since the Det1tic!ers are aJI minors they are reoresented by their next frIend Sri Muniswm9, major residing at ommanaha1y, Bidarahally Hobli, Bangalore South Ta1uk (By Sri S Ciara a Reddy, 4dvocte) And: 1) Kakkallappa alias Anjanappa, aged about 52 years, 8/0 late Byrapa 2) Rajanna, Sb Kakkalappe alias *njsnsppa, acted alxnit 49 yearse 3) Srrt. Rada’rma, W/o late Sonnappa, aged atout 40 years *11 the defendants 1, 2, 3, are residing at Inanthapura village, ye1ahank b1i, Bangalore North Taluk 4) sri J.Y, Issa, S/o J,Mark, aged stout 35 years, 5 Sri V.Narsyana Reddy, 6/0 Chea Reddy, aged stout 41 years, r/ near Raghavendra Swiiy tole, Jalahalli, Bangalore South Taluk, Bangalore—13. 6) Sri Munigeish, Sb Dodda veerappa, major in age, Resident of Tagenaha1ly, Bangalore North Taluk 7) St, Chikkamuniyamma, W/o Muniswsniaiah, major, r,’s Kothakur village K,R,Purem rbbli, Bangalore South Teluk, •.Resnor!dents (By Sri S.Vishmurthy, for C/RI & R) This C,RP. is filed under Section 115 of CPC against the order dated 42e9 passed in 0,S,Wo 405/96 on the file of the II Idditional Civil Judge (Senior Division) Bane1ore Rursl District, Bane1ore, disrnissng Lk.4 filed under Section 151 of CPC for grant of interim m1ntenar.ce of 4,500/ per month e3e This C.R.P. cowing on for admission thie day, the Court made the ibliovin.: ORDER The revision comm on for admission this ‘ay, is taken up for final disposal by coNent of the pprties. Peard and disposed of by this order. P. It is directed againat the order of the Trial Court, dismissing I.gJo. IV filed by the plaintiff jito are the minor children of aid defendant-reepon4ent c3aiming the intent maintenance of Pe.4,500/_ per month fzom defendant 1 and P wit are the plainti ffs’ grand-father and uncle respecti ely. 3. The rinor peti tioners are repr ented by the material uncle. There is no allegation of desertion by the mother-aid defendsrt. this s it is filed by the minor-petitioners reoresented by maternal uncle daring the life time of natural g’ ian-i.ther Ths eron lire tha .4A at y the a ternal Lnele is rot made oat rima fade *se. Pt: er, alUgati ns are made tbst the pinora ere a t prooerly rtainta ned. terefbr , a suit is filed for partition and seperate possession ‘)ring t.a petklewy nf the Jt t defendant- grand-father has de’osited IW.95,000/- each in Win8 I DeposIt in the name of 1st and 2nd plaintiff who are acted 15 years, It is claimed by the defendant No,l & 2 that tjø other chij.dren namely piair.tiff 3 and 4 are in the custody of 1st defendant, Thugb it is dIsputed at this stage by the mother, it is stated that the first defendant h 9s 4ven the resIdential beuse for the mother and children to stay and further deposit “-.,OOO/— in the joint name of the first defendant and mother of the children, Apart fm the deposit made in the name of plaintiffs 1 and 2 plaintiffs have requested c4,5OO/ a interIm maintence and also getting rent from I rented preises, Certain claims made by the plaIntiff are dIsputed in the suit. Therefore, the claim made cannot be accepted at this stage. The court below has to see whether the arrangient row made for the .jntenance of the daildren is sufficient f. r their maintenance, It is admitted by the learned counsel for the respondents that the third resnondent 1n wse custody plaintiffs I and P of theIr mother is getting ,5OO/ as maintenance out of the interest accured. He now subnits the interest accrued in fixed deposit of t50,000/- be aid to the children for maintenance, That comes to g. abut .1,1OO/— ocr month, In addition the mother is getting some amount as rent fm the rented resident1a1 use provided by the 1st defenr1ant This In my coirlion u1d be suffIcient to meet the exoenses of the children, end the court below Is directed to disoose of the matter in accordnce wIth law, Ordered Iccordlngly. 4, RevisIon is partly ailowed The 3rd res pondentRadamma is permitted to withdraw the interest accrued from the fixed denosit made in the name of Kumari Anith & Bhavya deDosited in Raitara Sabkara Seva Sangha, Singanayakanaballi, Bangalore and also from the deposit of ,5O,OOO/— standin in the name of Kakalappa alias 4njanappa and third resnondent Radnma. The Trial Court has to expedite the trial and disi.ose of the suit positively within 6 montha. Sd/ JUDGE KNE/17049