IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 17TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 26892 of 2010(J) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): --------------------- 1. PRAKASH B,S/O.BALACHANDRAN PILLAI, GOURI VIHAR,KUDAVATTOOR, ODANAVATTOM, KOTTARAKKARA. ** PRAKASH, PRAKASH BHAVAN, BHARATHIPURAM P.O., ANCHAL. (The Ist petitioner is substituted as Prakash, Prakash Bhavan, Bharathipuram P.O, Anchal as per order on I.A.No.11988/2010 dated 31/8/2010) 2. K.SAINULABDEEN, S.R.COTTAGE, CHADAYAMANGALAM,AYOOR BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE S.I.OF POLICE, ANCHAL, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. THE PUNALOOR MEKHAL PRIVATE BUS THOZHILALI UNION(CITU),ANCHAL, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SRI.K.SURESH KUMAR,PIN-691001 3. S.ANIL KUMAR, AJAY VILASAM, BHARATHIPURAM P.O,EROOR VIA, ANCHAL,KOLLAM. 4. SHAJI GEORGE, VAARAVILAPUTHENVEEDU, THINKALKARIKAM P.O.,KULATHUPUZHA, KOLLAM. 5. THE DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER, KOLLAM. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS. R2 TO R4 BY ADV. SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHANDAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.26892 OF 2010: PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1.TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 30.7.2010 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P2. TRUE COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT DATED 5.8.2010. EXT.P3.TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 22.8.2010 ADDRESSED TO THE IST RESPONDENT. EXT.P4.TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 24.8.2010 ADDRESSED TO THE IST RESPONDENT. EXT.P5.PHOTOGRAPHS EVIDENCING CONTINUED DETENTION OF THE VEHICLES. K.M.JOSEPH & T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.26892 of 2010-J ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 8th day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T K.M.Joseph, J. Petitioners have approached this Court seeking police protection. We have already passed an interim order. We heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the party respondents and also the learned Government Pleader. The writ petition is disposed of making the interim order absolute. However, we make it as a condition to the same that the petitioners will participate in the conciliation proceedings and also co-operate in the other statutory proceedings which are initiated by the party respondents. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. (T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) JUDGE. MS