'y « .^-••. ^iK^S?S;'-^S& :%:'B-?»" XN T8E TOSB <3a%T @F OTBIS&T E aT JAB&I»& !.P. Ne.j3 l|^ O /% ^ ^••-.i^'.'; periTIOBER; Ashok, Aged aboat 40 years, S/0 Shri Yugal Prasad Mishra, R/0 213, Ma'itri Nagar, Risali, Bhilai Teh. & Distt. Burg, V ER S0 S RESPONDENrSt 1» State of MP, (,Secretary Home Affairs Vallabh Bhavan Msntralaya, Bhopal 2. The Distrlct Magistrate 8. Licencirg Authoriy. Durg. 3. Additional District Magistrate IXirg 4. Sqperintendent Police ,,Durg. .^S-/~o.q-°^' pu- -s~r^)^e-"i-^ ^(^•-S^»-5eC'9fS^.. f7. t3lSTP-l^--''M^!£rB^£/UcEr<fH4.AuTHo&lTV t<"^.£^'.1'°"' ' ALLA^'^'3-^ •,-^c^ WIT PETITION UWER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CaNSTITUTION OF INDIA« *fmv9iWW ^ET^nzncCT, s^hpis, fiiriwy w p s<<'?% ^ 3ni?TtR^(<jcrfgd^) sii^wwf^nm awsii^Tamm 8^tI<R%rf^TOT^CT >nwrd<n-i MKwTfffet^ ^fa^i^ ^•3if^r3)rt?T kS.8.2006 SP/FS/2005-20,000^ |fhe petitioner. Shri R.R. Si&ha, P.L. for th^ State. Heard. writ petiti<|>n fhe petitioner bas questioned the of order dated 27.6.1998 (Annexure t, Raipur Division, Raipiu- ia au appeal sbv aJBnnina the order dated 6.7.1997 KAanexure P-4$ passed by the D|istrict Magistrate, Raipur whereby the llicense of the petitioner to po^ses a fire arm. i.e.32 Bore Revolver No.86215 bas been suspended fi^r the ttidefiiufe period. TIie petitioner has cballea^ed the above order on the grouiid tfaat wifhout giviag aay opportuDity to fhe petitioner to explaia his condfuct aad same has been passed for mdefixiite period, whereas unde^ the provisions of Section 17(3) of fhe Arm.s Act penod of suspension) ought to have been nientioned by the District Magistrate. ;spondents submits ttiat fhe Ucense ia touut of report of the Superintendeut of Police, Durg. But the fact reiB|ains that li.ceiise in questioa has been. auspended witbout affording o^|portunity to tbe petitioner to explaiu his conduct aad that too for fh^ iadefiiute period, whereas imder tfae provisions of Section 17(3) of the Act envisages that 'the ticensing auihority rrvxy by order in writir^g suspend, alicenoefor suchperiod as it ffanfcs fft or reuofces a licens^'. In the present caae the period of suspcnsion has aot bcea spcc^ficd, aioreover, it has becn nieQtioned in Section 420 of IPC & Section 27 oftJie 1 XI-HC-78 ^s-cvf •^i<<irt<i, u>Til'<i<is, Rrtwyt •^- SII^ST iraq> (4cji^ci<i) .SII^STiCTRi-ii* ,aaiI3II^T**li* •l ^; B;RTt8R^riS?r SII^ST TJ Prevention of Con-uption Act we|s particulars of tfaat case has not In view of above, ftie ordejr the Coinmissioner dated 27,6. Magistrate are hereby quashe^ directed to pass the appropria|te considenag all ffae materials peadiug agaiiist the petitioner but the been nientioned. dated 6."f. 1997 as weU as fhe order of 11998 confinnmg the order of District and the District Magistrate, Durg is )te orders in. accordance with ]aw after |available on record and after givin^ opporttmity of hearing to the With the direction aforesatd Certified copy as per rules petitioner. witi(o)<il'i fi*f«V*Tis'^l•(lut'f^l't ^ ^|! 3ri^H3II^?T fhe petition stands disposed of. :1KJI i!;/il