:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CONTEMPT PETITION NO.138 OF 200 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.138 OF 200 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.138 OF 2006 Veena Ranjit Parikh ...Petitioner. v. Renuka Dinesh Parikh ...Respondent. Mr.Kishor Jain for Tushar Goradia , advs. for the Petitioner. Mr.H.C.Mehta i/by M/s. Mehta & Co. , adv. for the Respondent. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 22nd February, 2008. DATE: 22nd February, 2008. DATE: 22nd February, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Petitioner and contemnor both are present with their counsel. Parties have filed Consent Terms marked ’X’ for Identification. In view of the amicable settlement between the parties as per the Consent Terms, nothing survives in the contempt petition and, therefore, contempt petition stands disposed off. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)