1 crap1414.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1414 OF 2010 _________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _________________________________________________________________________________ Shri D.R.Korde, A.P.P. for the applicant/State Ms Priyanka Sawaji, advocate holding for Shri S.S.Thombare, advocate for respondent nos. 1 to 3 ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : 6 th July, 2011. PER COURT :- 1 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2 This is an application preferred by the applicant/State seeking leave to file appeal, challenging the judgment and order,dated 16.12.2009, rendered by learned 1 st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, in Special Case No. 3 of 2005, thereby acquitting the respondent nos. 1 to 3 (original accused) for the offence punishable under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) and under Section 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. 2 crap1414.10 3 After hearing learned counsel for the parties, apparently it appears that there is corroboration between the complainant i.e. PW2 Arun Gohil and panch witness PW3 Pravin Sonwane in respect of the alleged demand and acceptance of the bribe of an amount of Rs.300/- and even the learned Trial Court has held that the sanction is valid. Hence, matter requires re-consideration, and therefore, present application seeking leave to file appeal is allowed. Present application be treated as appeal. 4 Admit. Ms Priyanka Sawaji, advocate holding for Shri S.S.Thombare, advocate waives service for respondent nos. 1 to 3 after admission. 5 Respondent nos. 1 to 3 to furnish same bail, but to execute fresh bonds before the Trial Court, within the period of four weeks. 6 R. and P. be sent back to the concerned court. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) dbm/crap1414.10