IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 25TH JANUARY 2010 / 5TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 2379 of 2010(V) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- REMESAN,DRIVER,KSRTC DEPOT, ATTINGAL,KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION. BY ADV. SRI.A.RAJASIMHAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND SECRETARY, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. ERXECUTIVE DIRECTOR(VIGILANCE), KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SC SRI.V.V.N.NAMBIAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ------------------- W.P.(C).2379/2010 -------------------- Dated this the 25th day of January, 2010 JUDGMENT 1. Petitioner's grievance is against Ext.P7, an order passed by the 3rd respondent finding the petitioner guilty of misconducts and imposing punishment. It is stated that even going by Ext.P7, he has got a right to be promoted promotion which is also denied to him. Aggrieved by Ext.P7, although the petitioner has filed Ext.P8 appeal before the 1st respondent, he has approached this Court, complaining about the alleged denial of promotion and the salary due. 2. The whole grievance originated out of the disciplinary action, which culminated in Ext.P7 order. Therefore, if Ext.P8 appeal is disposed of expeditiously, the grievance of the petitioner would be redressed. In view of this, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to dispose of Ext.P8 appeal with notice to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month of production of a copy of this judgment along with the copy of the writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs