IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.897 of 2009 Hari Ram @ Hari Chamar, son of Late Gauri Ram, Resident of Village Kargahar, P.O. and P.S. Kargahar, District Rohtas. -------- Petitioner/Appellant Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Director, Consolidation, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Joint Director of Consolidation, Bihar, Patna. 4. The Deputy Director of Consolidation, Rohtas, Sasaram. 5. The Consolidation Officer, Karagahar, District Rohtas at Sasaram. 6. Nimiki Ram, Son of Ram Ashish Ram, Resident of Village and Post and P.S. Kargahar, Dist. Rohtas. -------- Respondents/Respondents ----------- 4 14.12.2010 Having heard learned counsel for the appellant as also perusing the impugned order, we are of the considered opinion that no prejudice has been caused to the appellant writ petitioner, inasmuch as, the learned single Judge has recorded as follows:- “---- It appears to me that the matter raises issues relating to right, title and interest with respect to the land in question which cannot be adjudicated by the authorities under the Act.” In view of the aforementioned findings and the admitted factual position that both the appellant writ petitioner as also the respondent no.6 has purchased the same plot of land from the same owner, any issue as with regard to land, in question, can be adjudicated more effectively in an 2 appropriate civil suit. Thus, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order and accordingly, this appeal is disposed of. Rishi/Kanchan (T. Meena Kumari, J.) (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)