IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH AUGUST 2008 / 5TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 16869 of 2008(G) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------=----------- P.ANITHAKUMARI, ACCOUNTANT, CALICUT NORTH SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, P.O.KARUVASSERY, KOZHIKODE, PIN : 673 010. BY ADV. SRI.P.N.MOHANAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, (GENERAL) CALICUT. 3. CALICUT NORTH SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.LL37, P.O.KARUVASSERY, KOZHIKODE, PIN 673 010 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. ADV. SRI.T.A.SHAJI FOR R3 SMT.S.SHEEJA KUMARY(AYOOR) FOR R3 R1 & R2 SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.ANU SIVARAMAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.16869/2008 APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS EXT.P1:- COPY OF THE LETTER DT. 31.10.07 ALONG WITH THE RESOLUTION. EXT.P:- COPIES OF THE ORDERS. EXT.P3:- COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DT. 5.12.2007 IN WPC. NO.31218/07. EXT.P4: - COPY OF THE. JUDGMENT DT. 24.1.08. EXT.P5:- COPY OF THE LETTER DT. 5.2.08. EXT.P6:- COPY OF THE LETTER DT. 24.5.08 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE tss Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J. ================================== W.P.(C)No.16869 of 2008 ================================== Dated this the 27th day of August, 2008. JUDGMENT Petitioner seeks judicial review of Ext.P6 order on different grounds, including on her alleged entitlement to an order of exemption in her favour. However, a perusal of Ext.P6 would show that it does not disclose any reason for the decision and therefore there could not be any judicial review on the sustainability or otherwise of the order, which may or may not be applicable to the relevant statutory provisions. The impugned Ext.P6 is a cryptic order and on that short ground, the same has to be set aside. In the result, the decision contained in Ext.P6 is set aside and the Joint Registrar is directed to communicate to the petitioner the reason, if any, as contained in the communication referred to in WPC16869/08 -:2:- Ext.P6, so that the petitioner will know the reason on the decision against her stand. All other issues are left open. Writ petition is ordered accordingly. Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, Judge. sl.29.8.