y} ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT: BILASPUR W.P. No:as?-^ OF 2003 ^ PETITIONER Vinod Kumar Pandey, aged 64 years, son of late Shri P.L.Pandey, retired lecturer, resident of Lochan Bhawan, / Kotra Road, Railway Bunglowpara, Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS (1) State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Higher Education and Technical Education, Raipur. / ^ ..^3^ (2) Director, Technical Education ^^^yf^ Directorate, Satpura Bhawan, .^^s?-- ^^"' Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) ^* (3) Additional Director, Technical Education Directorate, Women Polytechnic Premises, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) (4) Principal, Kirodimal Government Polytechnic, Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. XI-HC-78 *11<4^1I S»»N|Ct» S^^IPTl^pr, ^Tn^tll<o, {^<rtl^y _*„ /AJ.P.^s-7^ ^2003 3T1^?T<TaW (I!g^3^eT) 3TT^T^T^i<=h <W3T|iSTsbHich -^ M^mt^ ^«1lW^cT 3TI^T 11.10.2006 Shri SoBinafh. Venna, Shri Saiideep Yadav, Dy. State/ respoiidents. Leamed counsel for tiie flie petitiosier has been redress|ed uifructuous, He subinits that iil pressing this writ petition. The petition is dissidssed cou^isel for the petitioiier, Coveniment Advocate for the p^titioner submits fhat flie claini of aad tiiis petition has become this view of flie raatter, he is not lll cbi^Ici^'i ^i^<nT^te^l'<(^<^i< ^3ri^T3TT^ST s not pressed beuig infructuous. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge <^0 .y P.T.O. /^