IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 4TH JANUARY 2011 / 14TH POUSHA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 1417 of 2010(S) ---------------------------------------------- [THE ORDER IN W.P.(C).NO.26169/2010 DATED 18/08/2010] .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER: ------------------------------------- POOKUNHIKOYA K.P., S/O.K.POORADAM ATTAKOYA THANGAL, AGED 60 YEARS, ANDROTH ISLAND, U.T.OF LAKSHADWEEP. BY ADVS. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN, SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. SRI. I.C.POOKOYA, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICE, ANDROTH, U.T.OF LAKSHADWEEP, PIN – 682 555. 2. SRI.J.K.DADOO, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRESENTLY WORKING AS ADMINISTRATOR, U.T.OF LAKSHADWEEP, KAVARATTI, PIN – 682 555. R1 & R2 BY SRI. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, S.C. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/01/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Con. Case (C) No.1417 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 4th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner alleges that Annexure A1 interim order has been violated. By Annexure A1 interim order, I have directed that eviction of the petitioners shall be only after complying with the directions in Ext.P6 regarding rehabilitation. The counsel for the respondents submits that, there is no actual eviction insofar as the petitioner is not occupying any building in the property and what is in the property is only a passenger hall. In view of the above submission, I am not inclined to take further action in the contempt case. Accordingly the contempt case is closed. S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE shg/