/‘) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR . W.P.l (C) No.314Z of 2010 Vishwanath, S/o Shivprasad Rajwar, aged about 60 years, Occupation Agriculture, R/o Medratola, Tahsil Ambikapur, District Surguja (CG) PETITIONER: -Versus- RESPONDENT: 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Revenue Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2. Collector, Surguja, Ambikapur, District Surguja (CG) 3. Secretary, Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Ambikapur, Surguja, District Surguja (CG) Present: Smt. Hamida Siddique, counsei for the petitioner. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govt.‘Advocate for State/respondents No.1 & 2. Single Bench: Hon’ble Shri Dhirendra Miehra,_J_= ORAL ORDER (2-7—2010) .V 1. The grievance of the petitioner is that the disputed land was agatn 1/ allotted to the petitioner by Tehsildar, Ambikapur vide Annexure-P/1 in the year 1975, however, subsequently, allotment in favour of the petitioner was cancelled. .The petitioner applied for review. The Tehsildar applied for permission from the superior officers for reviewing the order, however, permission was refused, thereafter cancellation of allotment was confirmed by the Collector. The petitioner has applied for review of order passed by the Collector which is pending, however, during the pendency of the review petition, the land in question has been ‘ allotted to Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Ambikapur. \ @6 2. -The Iimited prayer of the petitioner is that the Coilector may be directed to decide the review petition‘med by the petitioner expeditiousiy, to which Iearned counsel for the State has no objection. 3. Accordingiy, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Collector to decide the Ireview petition filed by the petitioner expeditiously. I'\_,.’ 5d]- Dhirendra Mishra‘ ‘ Judge i to i Walt Barve