Petftioners HISH COURT OF CHHATrtSSARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S5 No. 2022 of 2007 Versis 1. Smt. Torsila Lakdo, wife of Shri Wrendra Lokda, aged <A>out 43 years, Assi. Teo»;her, Primary School, Rompur, P.W.D. Korbo. District Kor-ba, Chhattisgarh. 2. Arun Kumcr Choudhary, son of Motichand Choudha^, aged ebout 37 yeors, Asst. Teacher, Tribal Welfwe beportment, Primory 5chool, Jaghara, Block Korbo, Distr-ict Korba, Chhattisgorh. 1. Stste of Chhatti^arh, Throigh The Secretary School Educotion Etepartment AAinistry b.K.S. Bhawan, Roipur Chhcrttisqarh. 2. Commissioner Triba! Welfare Department, Korba, &istrict Korbo (<;.©.) 3. Asst. Commissioner Triba! Welfore bepartment, torba, bistrict Korba (C.6.) 4. Block Edueotion Officer, Korba, Kartola, Kat9hora, Podi Uproda, Pali. Present; Mr. Amit Kumar ShOT-ma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vinay Pandey, Pane! Lcnsyet- for State/respondents. OR&ER Passed on this 3rd Oay of April, 2(X)7) 1. The question of tow involved herein asto whether the petitioners ar'e entitled to regutcr poy scale w.e.f. the dote of initial appointment or from the dote of completion of probation period. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as we!) as f<w the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of taw •\^':'.-''.•[•^' /\/-i^^^^'\TL^U-L^-lj'LJ-<^V<f\/^/1'^ involved the present writ pstition <re the same as to that of in W.P. (5) No. 5191/2006 (Har Prasad fairre and others vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others). which wos disposed of vide order ctated 3.10.2(X)S 3. In view of the above-stated submissions made by learned counset for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in the same terms. No order 05 to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Subhash