IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18188 of 2009 1. ARVIND KUMAR S/O SRI OM PRAKASH TIWARY, R/O VILL- SAREYAN, POST OFFICE- KOCHAS, P.S- KOCHAS, DISTT- ROHTAS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY, null PANCHAYAT RAJ, GOVT.OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT TEACGER EMPLOYMENT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ROHTAS AT SASARAM 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ROHTAS 5. THE DISTRICT PROGRAM CO-ORDINATOR OFFICER, DISTRICT EDUCATION PROJECT, ROHTAS 6. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, KOCHAS, DISTT- ROHTAS 7. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, KOCHAS, DISTT- ROHTAS 8. THE MUKHIYA GRAM PANCHAYAT, SAREYAN, BLOCK-KOCHAS, DISTT- ROHTAS 9. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT SAREYAN, BLOCK-KOCHAS, DISTT- ROHTAS 10. RISHIMUNI SINGH S/O BUTAN SINGH R/O VILL-SAREYAN, P.S AND P.O- KOCHAS, DISTT- ROHTAS ----------- 2 22.4.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the State. Petitioner’s grievance is that in the year 2005, respondent no.10 was selected for the post of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra, by giving wrong weightage, though he has passed Intermediate in second division but he was given weightage of first division. It has also been submitted that subsequently he came to know about all these things, when information was supplied to him, under Right to Information Act. Annexure-8 is the application, filed by the petitioner before the District Magistrate, Sasaram, for - 2 - referring his case to District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal, Sasaram. It is submitted by the petitioner’s counsel that till date no order has been passed. This application is being disposed off, directing the District Magistrate, Rohtas, for referring his case to District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal, Rohtas, for consideration of his objection as an appeal by the Tribunal. The Tribunal in case of such reference will treat the objection as an appeal and will decide the merit of the case in accordance with law within the statutory time. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.Kumar