1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 11061 of 2011-G Decided on: 19.12.2011. Dharam Singh, S/o Shri Tawari Ram, R/o Village Pandiala, P.O. Dalah, Tehsil Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, HP. …. Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of H.P. through Secretary, HP PWD to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-171 002. 2. The Executive Engineer-in-Chief, HP PWD, Nirman Bhawan, Shimla-171 002. 3. Superintending Engineer, 10th Circle, HP PWD, District Bilaspur, H.P. …. Respondents. Civil Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction to the respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, C. J. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, J. For the petitioner : Mr. Kul Bhushan Khajuria, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General, Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General 2 Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:- “i) That the writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued and Annexure P-3 & P-4 may be quashed and set aside and the respondent department may be directed to reconsider the case of the petitioner for providing employment assistance on compassionate ground to the petitioners.” 2. There will be a direction to the second respondent/competent authority to take a final decision in the case of the petitioner, within a period of two months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the second respondent. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, as above, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 19th December, 2011. (Justice Dev Darshan Sud), (ms/hl) Judge.