CWP(T) No. 5078/2008 3.5.2010 Present: Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Dy. A. G. with Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. A.G. for the respondents. Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, learned Deputy Advocate General fairly states that the present petition is in fact squarely covered by a decision rendered by this Court in Gauri Dutt & Ors. vs. State of H. P., Latest HLJ 2008 (HP) 366. According to him the facts are same and similar. In terms of the decision rendered by this Court in Gauri Dutt (supra) it is stated that the petitioner shall also be allowed to exercise his option to the post for which he wants to continue on work charged basis. In view of the aforesaid the present petition is disposed of with the observations that the petitioner shall exercise his option and the respondent/State shall take action thereupon as expeditiously as possible. ( Sanjay Karol ), Judge. May 3, 2010 (rana)