IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Revision No. 14 of 2003 Bala Devi, W/o Gajender Singh, R/o Kotwali Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar. …......... Revisionist. Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Secretary, Home. 2. Jugal Kishor Grover, S/o Chunni Lal, R/o Village Manpur, District Udham Singh Nagar. …........…Respondents Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. None present for the revisionist. Mrs. Mamta Bisht, AGA present for the State. Mr. S.K. Mandal, Advocate, present for respondent no. 2. Heard. This revision is directed against the order dated 18.12.2002 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kashipur in criminal case no. 2127 of 1997 whereby the said court has acquitted respondent no. 2 Jugal Kishor Grover from the charge relating to offence punishable under section 500 / 501 IPC read with section 3,4,6 of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 A perusal of the impugned order shows that a news item was published on 08.07.1996 in the local newspaper Prabhat Milan with story that revisionist, who was wife of a Constable, got her hairs cut at the asking of Station Officer of the police station. The trial court has observed that neither the cutting of hairs is indecent representation, nor it defames anyone. 2 Having gone through the impugned order passed by the trial court, this court does not find any illegality in the impugned order, which requires interference of this court in its revisional jurisdiction. Revision is dismissed. Lower court record be sent back. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 17.06.2011 SKS