IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33174 of 2009 SHEO NARAYAN YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 20.11.2009 Heard. The allegation is that the petitioner trespassed inside house of the lady, took her up into the field so as to violate her. The contentions have been the same as appear raised before the court below that there was no support by medical opinion and that the mother-in-law of the lady had not supported the allegation till the date on which the learned Sessions was dismissing the prayer for bail of the petitioner. The contention further was that the case appears in retaliation to the complaint filed by the wife of the petitioner vide Complaint Case No. 743( C) of 2009 in which the husband of the prosecutrix has been made accused almost of the same offence on a date two days prior to the date of the alleged occurrence as alleged by the prosecutrix. The next contention was that it was a well thought out 2 story which is further indicated by the belated receipt of the F.I.R. by the Magistrate. Considering the facts and circumstances as also considering the contentions as raised before me, I direct the release of the petitioner, namely, Sheo Narayan Yadav, on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, in Khaira P.S.Case No. 106 of 2009. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)