..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATIN NO.687 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.39 OF 2008 Mustafa Kasimbhai Salot. ..Applicant. Versus Union of India and Anr. ..Respondents. .... Ms.Nilophar Sayed, Adv. for the Applicant Ms.P.H.Kantharia, Counsel for Respondent No.1-UOI. Mr.Rajesh More, APP, for Respondent No.2-State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 3rd July, 2008. DATED : 3rd July, 2008. DATED : 3rd July, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant-orig.accused No.1 and the learned Counsel for the respondent No.1-NCB. 2. The applicant has been granted bail by this Court in NDPS Spl. Case No.64 of 2006 by order dated 15.4.2008. One of the condition i.e. condition (b) imposed on the applicant while granting bail reads as under :- "(b) The Applicant Mustafa Kasimbhai Salot is directed to be released on bail in ..(2).. connection with the offence in NDPS Spl. Case No.64 of 2006, if not required in any other case, on executing bail bond in the sum of Rs.One Lakh with two local sureties in the like amount." 3. The learned Counsel for the applicant states that the applicant is unable to comply with the said condition of furnishing two local sureties and due to this fact, though bail was granted on 15.4.2008, the applicant has been languishing in jail for more than two and half months. 4. The learned counsel for respondent No.1-NCB states that the applicant may furnish one local surety and one other surety or if the bail amount is substantially increased, in such case respondent-NCB will insist on only one surety. 5. In this view of the matter, I am inclined to increase the bail amount to Rs.1,50,000/- (Rs.One Lakh Fifty Thousand Only) and the applicant shall furnish one surety. The said surety shall be either from Mumbai or Thane which ..(3).. is adjoining District. 6. In view of the above, condition No.(b) in the order dated 15.4.2008 is modified : (b) The Applicant Mustafa Kasimbhai Salot is directed to be released on bail in connection with the offence in NDPS Spl. Case No.64 of 2006, if not required in any other case, on executing bail bond in the sum of Rs.1,50,000/- (One Lakh Fifty Thousand Only) with one surety in the like amount. The said surety shall be either from Mumbai or Thane which is adjoining District. 7. Rest of the conditions in the order dated 15.4.2008 are maintained. 8. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)