IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.29498 -M of 2011 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : SEPTEMBER 27, 2011 HARPREET SINGH & ANR. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 This petition under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, filed on behalf of Harpreet Singh and Sukhraj Kaur, prays for indulgence in view of the alleged fact that the petitioners got married on account of a love affair. Respondents No.4 to 8, who happen to be relatives of petitioner No.2, have not accepted the marriage and, therefore, have been giving threats to the petitioners. 2 Notice of motion. 3 On the asking of the Court, Shri Manoj Bajaj, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. 4 At this stage, Shri B.S. Bajwa, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No.4 to 8. Criminal Misc. No.29498 -M of 2011 (O&M) 2 5 Respondent No.4-Baldev is present in court and has spoken to his daughter-Sukhraj Kaur in Court for some time. 6 Baldev states that he shall not cause any harm to the petitioners. 7 In view of the stand of respondent No.4, no further directions are required to be issued. 8 The petition stands disposed of. September 27, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?