IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16997 of 2011 Vijay Kumar Mishra Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02 24.06.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 143, 341, 323 and 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The accusation is of demand of dowry and torture but it appears in the maintenance case Rs. 4,000/- per month was awarded to the informant and her minor son while granting bail to the other family members the undertaking was given for depositing the entire maintenance amount. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that entire maintenance amount as per the direction of the learned court below has already been deposited in the account of the informant. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the informant that still two months maintenance amounts have not been 2 deposited. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar, in connection with Brahampur P.S. Case No. 179 of 2010, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The bail bond of the petitioner will be provisionally accepted by the learned court below till the verification of the fact that in pursuance of the order dated 14.09.2010 passed in Family Court, Buxar, in Matrimonial Case No. 47 of 2010 the petitioner has deposited the up-to-date maintenance amount. Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)