1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.09.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P(MD)No.1512 of 2011 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 C.Duraimanickam .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Divisional Engineer, High Ways, (Construction and Maintenance), Sivagangai. 2.The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Highways, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. 3.K.K.Meenakshi Sundaram, The Divisional Engineer, Highways, (Construction and Maintenance), Sivagangai. .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to order passed by the first respondent in Se.Mu.Ka.No.3/09-10/A3, dated 03.01.2011 received on 04.02.2011, quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to permit the petitioner to complete the work within the period fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Anandkumar For R-1 and R-2 : Mr.TR.Janarthanam, Additional Govt. Pleader For R-3 : No Appearance O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed to quash the order passed by the first respondent in Se.Mu.Ka.No.3/09-10/A3, dated 03.01.2011 and to direct the first respondent to permit the petitioner to complete the work, within the period fixed by this Court. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2. Heard Mr.J.Anandkumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.TR.Janarthanam, learned Additional Government Pleader, who takes notice for R-1 and R-2. 3. By consent, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. Though the Writ Petition has been filed challenging the termination order, now the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner may be permitted to give a detailed representation to the respondents 1 and 2 and a direction may be issued to the first and second respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner for extension of time, to complete the work. 5. In such view of the matter, the petitioner is given liberty to make a detailed representation to the first and second respondents and on receipt of such representation, the authorities are directed to consider the same, on merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's claim. 6. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(T&P) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Divisional Engineer, High Ways, (Construction and Maintenance), Sivagangai. 2.The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Highways, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. +1cc to the Special Govt.Pleader, Sr.No. 32227 pm/ts ssk/04.10.2011 /4c -2p/- W.P.(MD)No.1512 of 2011 19.09.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/