1 APL 441.11.sxw JPP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 441 OF 2011 Mr. Rajkumar Rampal Pandey & Ors. ... Applicants. V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents. Mr. Bhupendra Mishra i/b. Mr.. Ganesh Singh for the Applicants. Mrs. R.V. Newton, APP for the State. Mr. Arunkumar Tripathi for Respondent 2. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 04th OCTOBER 2011. P.C. :- Heard. 2. Parties i.e. Mr. Rajkumar Pandey and Mrs. Sarita Rajkumar Pandey present, identified by the respective Counsel. The matrimonial controversy between the couple is resolved and consequently, they have agreed to get orders of compounding in C.C. No.2290/PW/2007 pending before the 26th Metropolitan Magistrate’s Court at Borivali, Mumbai filed by Respondent No.2 - Smt. Sarita for an offence punishable under Section 498A, 406 r/w. 34 of I.P.C. 2 APL 441.11.sxw 3. Since Section 498A of I.P.C. not compoundable by exercise of Section 482 of Cr.P.C., the proceedings initiated by Respondent No.2 against the Applicants are quashed and set aside. The Application allowed. Bail bonds, if any, executed by the Applicants are terminated. Affidavit is taken on record. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)