l CL; ygi‘.‘ gmgie Bench IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.(S)No. ulqa 0F2011. PETITIONER : Ramnarayan Jain, S/ 0. Shri Dayaram—Jain, aged about 41 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School Bevarti, Block Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.) V E R S U S NDENTS :1: State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) 2.. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer, ' Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.) 4. Treasury Officer, Treasury Account and Pension, Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.) 5. Joint Director, Treasury Account and Pension, sf/ Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar at ‘ Jagdalpur (C. G.) RESPO W @‘ RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA W Counsel for the State sub Knits that case of the petitioner same lines. would also be considered on the w JXI—HC—78 MPmwWow'Lwg‘E mm m 3mmW (Wu) $§$§ WWm W$fa§§W 8.3.: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE I'RITXNKER DIWAKER 03.08.2011 Shri Somkant Verma, coumsel for the petitioner. Shri N.Naha Roy, RL. for the Statt. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to bandit of two advan 2e increments on account of he having passed B.’I‘.I. examination in the year 1993 before his appoinunent at his own cost. 1t is submitted that the issue ( involve-id in the present petition is no longer res integra and the same has been mall)? decided by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in § the case of Asha Saxena Vs. State of MxP. & Ors. 2009 (III)MPJR (SC) 59. ‘ It is further submitted that this Court has also taken a y: similar View in its order dated 6.2.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No. l _ 6257/2008, Counsel for the petitioners further submits that F the order dated 29.4.2010 passed in Writ Appeal NO. V 124/2009, wherein relying upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxeua (supra) and the order passed. by this Court in another Writ Appeal No. 87/2009, directions have been issued for considera Lion of the case for grant of two advance increments as per circular dated 21.9.1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh: after verincation of the facts pleaded in the petition. XI-HC—7 8 mm 1R zoo mm (Wu) 23 mimfzaiih‘ WWW?! WW'§1§@W mmm *aiwqm In View of above, the patition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent aut horities to decide the daim of the petitioner for grant of two advance increments as per circular dated 21.9.1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh after verification of the facts pleaded in the petition Within a pen'od of four months today. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and. the authority concerned same strictlv in accordance would be at libexty to decide with law. Sd/— Pritinker Diwaker Judge m e