R.S.A NO. 1652 OF 2007 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A NO. 1652 OF 2007 DECIDED ON : 09.10.2009 Anil ...Appellant versus Surjit and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. C. B. Goel, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Sunil Panwar, Advocate, for respondents No.1,2,3 and 5. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The defendant is in second appeal aggrieved against the judgment and decree passed by the Courts below, whereby suit for permanent injunction, was decreed. It was found that the plaintiffs are in possession of the suit property being legal heirs of Badlu. Both the Courts have given concurrent finding of fact that the plaintiffs are in possession of the suit property. Such finding has been returned on the basis of revenue record Exhibit PW2/C. Learned counsel for the appellant could not raise any meaningful argument to dispute the finding given by both the Courts below. R.S.A NO. 1652 OF 2007 -2- In view of the above fact, I do not find any patent illegality or irregularity in the judgment and decree passed by both the Courts below, which may give rise to any substantial question of law for consideration by this Court. Dismissed. OCTOBER 09, 2009 (HEMANT GUPTA) shalini JUDGE