Criminal Miscellaneous No.27462 OF 1999 ---- In the matter of an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. ---- GAURISHANKER S/O LATE KRISHNA BIHARI PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAKHDUMPUR, P.S. MAKHDUMPUR, DISTRICT JAHANABAD. ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. J.SUJATA, BRANCH MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, HAJIPUR BRANCH, HAJIPUR. 3. SURENDRA KUMAR RAI, INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CIRCLE INSPECTOR, MAHNAR, DISTT. VAISHALI. ... ... OPPOSITE PARTIES. ---- For the Petitioner : M/S Dharmendra Kumar,Adv. Binay Kumar Singh,Adv. Subodh Kumar Singh,Adv. For the State : Mrs. Pronoti Singh,A.P.P. ---- P R E S E N T THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ---- Rakesh Kumar,J. While invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the sole petitioner has virtually prayed for quashing of the F.I.R. No.172 of 1999 dated 14.6.1999 in Town P.S., District Vaishali for the offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. 2. On perusal of the F.I.R., which is Annexure-1 to the petition, it is evident that the petitioner and one another had visited - 2 - State Bank of India along with forged Bank Drafts and after noticing that the drafts were forged, the police was called for lodging F.I.R. and investigating the said occurrence and on the basis of written information given by the Chief Manager of the State Bank of India, Hajipur, Vaishali Town P.S. Case No.172 of 1999 was registered on 14.6.1999 for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. On perusal of the F.I.R. itself, it is clear that the F.I.R. discloses commission of the offences. Moreover, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., the petitioner was not entitled to make a prayer for quashing of the F.I.R. In absence of pendency of any proceeding before the court, the petitioner, on ill advice, had filed the present petition. 5. I do not find any merit in the present petition and, accordingly, petition stands rejected. 6. In view of rejection of the present petition, the interim order of stay dated 9.3.2000 stands automatically vacated. - 3 - 7. Let a copy of this order be sent to the court below forthwith. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.) PATNA HIGH COURT Dated 26.4.2010 N.A.F.R./N.H.