IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31179 of 2008 BIJENDRA THAKUR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18.8.2008 Heard. The petitioner is not named in the FIR of a case under Section 394 IPC and has been named by an accused caught at the spot. The contention is that the petitioner has nothing to do with the offence and that the man who had committed the offence was caught with the jeep. The further contention is that in spite of being in custody since 2.5.2008 the petitioner was not put on test identification parade. Let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in Shahpur P.S.Case no.24 of 2008. It is made very clear that as and when the police requires the petitioner for putting the test identification parade the petitioner shall make himself available to him. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )