1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5335 of 2009 SMT.GEETA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 03 03.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Accountant General. No one appears on behalf of the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the Accountant General has issued the authorization for payment of the gratuity. However, the same has been sent to incorrect address of the petitioner, as such the payment could not be affected as yet. Learned counsel submits that for expeditious disposal of the claim petitioner propose to file a representation before the respondent no.3 Collector Saharsa. In case, such representation is filed giving the relevant documents along with the certified copy of the present order, the respondent no.3 shall consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months on receipt of such representation so that the claim of the petitioner for payment of retiral dues as per Annexure-1 would be paid without delay. This writ application stands disposed 2 of with the above observations and directions. P.K. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)