IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 19th day of May 2003 II Bail Application no. 399 of 2003 Order on the bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Preetam Singh S/o Murli Singh, Resident of Village Mahuadabra, P.S. Jaspur, District Udham Singh Nagar. -----------accused applicant Versus State of Uttaranchal ------------Opposite party ______________________________________________________________ Arising out of case crime no.107 of 2002 U.S. 302 IPC. P.S. Jaspur, District Udham Singh Nagar. ______________________________________________________________ By the court Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal J. Heard Smt. Pushpa Joshi learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Rakesh Thapaliyal learned Counsel for the complainant as well as Sri H.C. Pandey learned A.G.A. The first bail application was rejected by the then Hon’ble Chief Justice of High Court of Uttaranchal on 04.10.2002. Smt. Pushpa Joshi learned Counsel for the applicant has stated that now the charge sheet has been submitted and most of the witnesses have been examined. Learned A.G.A. has stated that the testimony is not test worthy. Sri Rakesh Thapaliyal learned Counsel for the complainant has vehemently opposed the bail. Considering the facts there is no ground, in my opinion, to grant bail. The bail application is rejected. However, the Sessions Judge, Udham Singh Nagar is directed to conclude the trial preferably within a period of three months. With these observations this bail application is disposed of. 19.05.2003: NCM: (M.M. Ghildiyal, J.)