IN 1W EiEGEi CQifRT OF JUDICATURE AT rJABAIzE’UR’ 7WRIT Pmmmw Nc$ 8 {é g c2? 2mm $ET$TEQE {ELDER A'R’E‘TCLES 22$/227 C§N§TIWTEQN @Ej IHDIA :Ei‘ETITiOHERs: lib mm Sangaata Thbgani Wife @ 5mm Raj Kumar Thmamiv ageca abaut 33 vma 2% wk. Mewa Thamnig wif§ @f $3hri $hankgrlai Tharauis @geKi 35years. gam résdenm af mu, vridi Galia Magak’aj Mara r%©hail&g aaipum VEREBUS 10 E€aipur DEvalwmenh Aathm‘im? R&i§>urg thmmgh its {i‘nief Exg’acmbive Gffiaem Raim’im Asim}: Ktmtar Fataamig eaggd abmié; 552 yearag 3c; V£ahaamw Fame-mag agga §bwt 57 years)” $9 ShiVEaj Fatnanig agad abcmt 6A3 years E All saw M Emma» mural mammal aas- Fahnaaiar r/a Slmntinagarg ga‘iFu‘: $ 5a $31M Imiira Duae wife; sf S5hri maulatram Daag r/G Ahmedabaé {@tzjrat) a m e 3mm Bhagwaa K@sw&n£9 w£f@ l @f Shri 5hénk¢arlal Kwwanig x/c $hankemagar, aaipum i zamrrrom mama Amxcmsa 225/227 ox.“ THE CQNSTETU‘I'IGN 6:.- l'WIA FOR E$¢UAVCE 6F 55$? APPROPRIATE: WRET§ DERECT$€3N ANIDI’OR QRDERQ BETA ILS OF PETEIDM W N¥\ 1 , Sdl- , & Fakhruddin Judge Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty . to file WW afresh in case any cause of action still . surmves. . XI—EC—-78 WW, 3?} FF a” 3G Egi . um» NO‘ Qé? , Wgm m 2OGQ WI $1W ww m . mW (Kama) WWWm WW a; mm? W ffm F512?W 17.1.2002 Shri Bhisham Kinger, Counsel for petitionef No.2. Shn' S.L.Bajaj, counsel for respondent No. 1. Shri Kinger submits tha1 in View of the dismissal ofW.P.No.602‘ of’ 1996, no cause of action survives and he does not press this > petiu‘on‘