KJ 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.73 OF 2010 IN TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.32 OF 2010 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.265 OF 2009 Late Mr.Rajesh U.Nair ..Deceased Rishabh R.Nair (through its Guardian Mr.P.Balakrishnan Nair) ..Petitioner Vs. Mrs.Shubha Nair ..Caveator ---- Mr.Sureshkumar J.Panicker for the petitioner. Mr.N.S.Das for the caveator. ---- CORAM : R.S.MOHITE, J DATE : 13/8/2010 P. C.: 1 This is a Chamber summons taken out by the original petitioner for amending his petition. The petition is recently filed in 2009 and the issues have not yet been framed. Taking into account the nature of the amendment which is mentioned in the schedule which pertains to flat no.B-701 and seeks to introduce the pleading that the same stood in the name of deceased parents, KJ 2 in my view, the amendment cannot be said to be irrelevant. No prejudice would be caused by allowing the amendment. In the circumstances, for the reasons which are mentioned in the affidavit in support, Chamber summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause-(a). Amendment to be carried out within a period of three weeks. Amended copy to be served upon the respondent immediately to enable him to file reply. (R.S.MOHITE,J.)