IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 13973 of 2001 Between: 1 Nayanak Seth S/o Praveen Seth Ho.No.202, Shreeji Mehta Park, Rasoolpura, Secunderabad. 2 Mrs.Swathi Baxi W/o Vikram Baxi R/o 201Shreeji Mehta Park, Rasoolpura, Secunderabad. 3 P.Sashidar Sriram Kumar, S/o Radha Krishna Murthy Flat No.401 Shreeji Mehta Park, Rasoolpura, Secunderabad. 4 Smt.Shefali Sakaria W/o Sri Sanjay Sakaria (Hindu) R/o Flat No.205,Shreeji Mehta Park, Rasoolpura, Secunderabad. 5 M.Vinaya Kumar Reddy S/o Somi Reddy R/o Flat No.405, Rasoolpura, Secunderabad. 6 Smt.Kusum Benkadakia W/o late Jaswanthi Bai Kadakia R/o Flat No.402, Rasoolpura, Secunderabad. 7 Ms.S.Sunitha Reddy W/o Pulla Reddy R/o Flat No.403, Rasoolpura, Secunderabad. 8 S.M.Reddy S/o Pulla Reddy R/o Flat No.503, Rasoolpura, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Secunderabad Cantonment Board Rep by Executive Officer, Cantonment Board Office, Secunderabad 2 M/S Metha Builders Rep by Partner J.K.Metha S/o Mohanlal Metha General Bazar, Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue appropriate Writ, order or direction preferably a Writ in the Nature of Mandamus declaring the notices bearing No.EB/UAV/Sy.No.11/1/R.Pura/2947, 2948, 2953, 2954, & 2955 dt:5.7.2001 issused by the 1sr respondent proposting to demolish the flats bearing No.201, 202, 205, 401, 402, 403, 405, and 503 in Metha appartments (Shreeji Metha Park) behind Hokey Stadium, forming part of S.No.11/1, Rasoolpura, Secunderabad as illegal and void and consequently direct the respondent -1 not to proceed with demolition of the flats pursuant to the impugned notices and regularise the construction of the flats by accepting the aquired open land from the 2nd respondent to confirm to the buildings regulation. Counsel for the Petitioner:None appeared. Counsel for the Respondents: MR.Y.V.RAVI PRASAD The Court made the following : ORDER: When the matter was called on 28.03.2008, none appeared and therefore, it was posted to 04.04.2008 under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today also none appeared. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. Date:04.04.2008 Ccm To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{MN}