IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.10149 of 2002 Between: Smt. Liqunnisa Begum, W/o.Syed Abdul Ahmed, R/o.H.No.7-10/2, Raghavendranagar, Nacharam, R.R.District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District. 2 Revenue Divisional Officer, Hyderabad-East, Hyderabad. 3 Mandal Revenue Officer, Uppal, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction preferably one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in dispossessing the petitioner from her patta land to an extent of Ac.3-36 gunats in S.No.136 of Uppal Village and Mandal, R.R.District without following due of process of law, as illegal, arbitrary, null and void and consequently direct the respondents to issue No Objection Certificate in favour of the petitioner to enable her to sell away the said land to the interested 3rd parties. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.J.KANAKAIAH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.10149 of 2002 ORDER: The case of petitioner is that her husband by succession acquired an extent of Acs.3.36 guntas in survey No.136 of Uppal Village and Mandal in Ranga Reddy District. After his death, she succeeded to the property. She alleges that during lifetime of her husband, respondents fixed full tank level of Pedacheruvu of Uppal village and demarcated the land. She requested authorities for no objection certificate to sell the land as she is in need of money. It is alleged that respondents threatened to dispossess petitioner without initiating any proceedings under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Therefore, she filed writ petition seeking direction to respondents. At the time of hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for (Telangana Area) submits that respondents are not interfering with possession and that they will follow due process of law for depriving petitioner of her right to enjoy the property. The same is recorded. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. _____________ (V.V.S.RAO,J) August 07, 2009 YS