IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.12274 of 2007 Between: Namburi Bosu Babu ..... Petitioner AND 1.The Superintendent of Police, Eluru, West Godavari District and 6 others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: None appeared Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: AGP for Home Counsel for respondent No.4: Mr.K.Chidambaram Counsel for respondent No.5: Mr.A.Ramalingeswara Rao Counsel for respondent No.6: ----- Counsel for respondent No.7: S.Appadhara Redy The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the official respondents in not taking any action even after completion of more than six years from the date of registration of rime No.314 of 2001 as being illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to complete the investigation.” At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing respondent Nos.1 to 3, on instructions, submitted that Crime No.314 of 2001, in respect of which relief is claimed in this Writ Petition, was closed by referring the same as civil in nature. In view of the aforesaid submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.15295 of 2007, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 17th June, 2011 lur This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing the proceedings No.PC/(Lands-I)/533/07, dated 16-10-2009, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of aRtiles 14, 21 and 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution of India and for a consequential order directing the respondents to extend the lease for a period of 20 years by considering the representation, dated 22-10-2009, and also by taking the cases of other lessees, who are similarly situated, into consideration.” Sri Ch.Dhanamjaya, learned Counsel for the petitioner, circulated letter, dated 12-03-2010, to the Registry wherein he stated that his client instructed him to withdraw the Writ Petition in view of the order passed by the Government of A.P., vide G.O.Ms.No.3, dated 11- 03-2010. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, interim order, dated 27-10-2009, is vacated and WPMP.No.30048 of 2009, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous.