@ W K IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, ' CHHATI‘ISGARH wmT PETITIQN No, <§é95 OF 2003 f PETITIONERS 1. Vazir Khan, aged about 43 years, S/o Hussain Khan, working as Head Constable (Electric) posted at Range Police, Motor Transport Workshop, Bilaspur, District Biiaspu r (Chhattisgarh) 2. Somnath Shakywai, aged about 37 years, S/o Ghasiram Shakywal, working as Head Constabie (Mechanical) posted at Range Office, Motor ~ Transport Workshop, Bilaspur, Dist. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 3. Shobharam Patel, aged about 36 yeas, S/o Murlidhar Patel, working as Head Constable (Mechanical), posted at Range Office, Motor Transport Workshop, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 1. Union of India, through the Secretary, Department of Personal &Training, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi 2. State of Madhya Pradesh through the Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) 3. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Department of Home Affairs D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 4. Advisory Committee (Lohani) constituted under section 71 of Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act 2000, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) Versus RESPONDENT-S WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/§27 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 4 HIGH COURT OF CHEAT‘TESGARH AT BILASPUR single gench: Hon’bla Mr‘ Justice Sati5h Kn Agnihotri. i Wn't Petition No. 2695 of 2003 Pstitioners Vazir Khan and tvm ethers Vasus Respondents UniQn of India 85 others Shri Rajendra Tripathi, Advocate for the petitiomers. Shri S. K. Beriwal, Stemding counsd for Respandent Nd 1. Shri Sachin Singh Rajput far Raspandmn No, 2 85 4. Shn' Pankaj Shxivastava, Panal lawyar for the respondent No. 3. ORAL ORDER ( 8th February, 2006) Th6 followhlg ordér of ths Court was pass€d by Satish K. Agnihotri, J. 1: Lsamed ccunsel appsaring far tha petititmers submits that the petitioners are. wcrking in the Range office, Motor Transport Workshop, Bilaspur. The petitioners had submitted their option for serving in The. State of Madhya Praclesh. The peh'tioners have been ellocated to the State of Chhattisgarh and. they want their reallocation to the State of Madhya Pradesh‘ Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instruction, submits that the petitioners be grantect liberty to make a repreeentation to the respondents for redressal of their grievances. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection to the said submission. to in View‘of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of finally, with Eberty to the petitioners to make an appropriate representation to the respondentsfauthonties concerned, within a period of two weeks from today, and the respondents! authorities are directed to consider and decide the same, in an objective manner, in aceoidance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receiot of the representation 1f any/ s.» , Certified copy, as per Rules j 7, Sd/- c ‘ ‘ ‘ aush K mum“ Judge Thakur ’ n1 7 ' J m .sioauM e