IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 3088 of 2010. Decided on: 15th July, 2010. Vinod Kumar. ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and ors. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Pawan Gautam, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed for the following prayers: “(i) Issue any appropriate writ, order or directions especially a writ in the nature of certiorari with a prayer for quashing the impugned selection of private respondents No. 4 to 6 made by the respondents on the post of Panchayat Sahayak being illegal, invalid, wrong and not sustainable in law and be made afresh after declaring the petitioner as successful candidate for the said post; (ii) Issue a writ of mandamus thereby directing the official respondents to decide the representation (Ann.P-6) of the petitioner in accordance with law.” 2. The Block Development Officer is present before us with the records. Prima facie, we find that there are certain mistakes in awarding and totaling of the marks. The Block Development Officer submits that the matter will be looked 2 into and appropriate action will be taken in the matter. It is also submitted that the petitioner will also be called for interview. In view of the steps thus taken and depending on the marks obtained by the petitioner in the interview, he will be appropriately placed among the list of short listed candidates. The needful, as above, shall be done within one month from today. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 15th July, 2010. ( Justice Rajiv Sharma), (tr) Judge.