IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-26727 of 2008 Date of Decision: November 12, 2008 Nannu Ram @ Nannu … Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present : Mrs. Sarla Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Mor, Sr. DAG, Haryana. S.D. Anand, J. The parole plea of the petitioner – prisoner was declined by the Competent Authority by relying upon the report made by none-else or other than the father of the petitioner that the conduct of his son is not good and he is in the habit of committing crimes. The father has presently sworn an affidavit dated 20.05.2008 to the contrary. In the course of the affidavit, he has explained that it was on the basis of a misconception that he had given the earlier affidavit. Crl. Misc. No.M-26727 of 2008 The petition shall stand disposed of with a direction to the Competent Authority to take a decision afresh on the parole plea of the petitioner, within one month from today, in the light of the present stance of the father of the petitioner-prisoner. It will be for the State counsel to communicate the order to the Competent Authority. Copy of the order be given to the learned State counsel under the signatures of the Court Secretary. November 12, 2008 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 2