IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8819 of 2010 BRAJESH YADAV, S/o Dinanath Yadav. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 15.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 304B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that the informant himself resiled from his earlier statement that his daughter was done to death by her in-laws, let the petitioner above named who is in custody since 29.06.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Smt. Rumpa Kumari, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Gaya (or her successor) in connection with Khizersarai P.S. Case No. 105 of 1998 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will give an - 2 - undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The trial court in seisin of the case will conclude it expeditiously in view of the fact that the informant has now compromised the matter and there is no likelihood of conviction. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)