1 Cri.Appl.No.2718 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2718 OF 2010 Fazil Ahmed S/o.Ahmed Hussain, and others APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others RESPONDENTS Mr.A.N.Kakade, learned counsel for the applicants. Mr.G.R.Ingole, learned A.P.P. for respondent State. Mr.U.B.Bilolikar, learned counsel for respondent no.3. (CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.) DATE : 06/04/2011 PER COURT : 1. By the present application u/s. 482 of The Cr.P.C., the applicants have approached this Court with the prayers to quash the FIR in CR No.37/10, registered in Dharmabad Police Station for an offence punishable u/s. 420, 465, 468, 471 r/w. 34 of The IPC. 2. Heard learned counsel for applicants, learned A.P.P. and learned counsel for respondent no.2, the complainant. Even though, affidavit is not filed to oppose this application, it is informed across the bar that now the charge sheet is filed in this CR after completion 2 Cri.Appl.No.2718 of 2010 of investigation. Perusal of the complaint discloses that Gift-Deed was allegedly executed by Halimabee, the mother of respondent no.2, the complainant. In the complaint, it is alleged that at the time of alleged execution of the Gift-Deed, Halimabee was not feeling well, so also the thumb impression on the Gift Deed was not of Halimabee, for which investigation is carried out. Perusal of the complaint prima facie shows that the offence is made out, hence no interference is required at the hands of this Court. Application sans any merit, hence rejected. These observations are prima facie, and Trial Court not to influence with these observations. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/APRIL 2011/cri.appl.2718-10