IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.W.P.(T) No. 6274 of 2008 Decided on: 16th November, 2010 Rajesh Kumar Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge For the Petitioner: Ms. Nishi Goel, vice counsel For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K.Verma, Dy. A.G. ______________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Though the petitioner approached the Tribunal with certain grievances, it is submitted that now the only surviving grievance is with regard to the vacation salary. Reliance is placed on the decision of this court reported in 2009 (1) Latest HLJ 293, Baldev Singh and others Vs. State of H.P. and others. 2. Learned Deputy Advocate General submits that the matter is now pending before the Supreme Court. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of as follows:- 3. In case the petitioner gives an undertaking to the effect that in case the decision of the Supreme Court goes against him, he would refund the vacation salary with 10% interest. The vacation salary shall be paid to him on the basis of the undertaking within another three months. 4. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice November 16, 2010(K) ( Justice V.K. Ahuja), Judge