IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN TUESDAY, THE 17TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 26TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 32867 of 2009(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- LLOYD THOMAS, AGED 24 YEARS, S/O.THOMAS, RESIDING AT THOMAS VILLA, THEKKANATH, P.O.KANDASSASAN KADAVU, KARAMUCR, THRISSUR, KERALA. BY ADV. SRI.T.MADHU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY.P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY.P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY SC SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/11/2009,ALONG WITH W.P.(C). 32892/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.N.RAVINDRAN, J ------------------- W.P.(C).32867 & 32892 of 2009 -------------------- Dated this the 17th day of November, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner in W.P.(C).32867/2009 appeared for the fourth semester B.Tech degree examination in Electronics and Communication Engineering conducted by the University of Calicut. The results were published in the last week of August 2009. The petitioner failed in the paper, “Engineering Mathematics”. He has therefore applied for revaluation of his answer script by submitting Ext.P1 application dated 7.9.2009. It is stated that the requisite fee has also been paid. 2. The petitioner in W.P.(C).32892/2009 appeared for the fifth semester B.Tech degree examination in Information Technology conducted by the University of Calicut in December 2009. The results of the said examination were published in the first week of October 2009. The petitioner failed in the paper “Graph Theory and Combinatorics”. He has therefore applied for revaluation of his answer script by submitting Ext.P1 application dated 12.10.2009. 3. The petitioners submit that they have completed their course of study and that they had done well in the W.P.(C).32867 & 32892/09 2 examination. It is also stated that if their answer scripts are revalued, they are hopeful of securing a pass. In these writ petitions, the petitioners seek expeditious revaluation of their answer scripts. Sri.P.C.Sasidharan, the learned standing counsel appearing for the University of Calicut submits that if the applications for revaluation submitted by the petitioners are in order and the requisite fee has been paid, the University will take expeditious steps to revalue their answer scripts and to communicate result to them. In the light of the said submission, I dispose of these writ petitions with a direction to the respondents to take steps to have the petitioners' answer scripts revalued and to communicate the result to them within eight weeks from the date on which the petitioners' produce a certified copy of this judgment before the Controller of Examinations, University of Calicut. P.N.RAVINDRAN, Judge mrcs