i^-S^SJXw^ IN THE HKSII COURT OF JtJWt^TURT^T BILASPUR WRIT PETITIONNO. ^ 3,^ ^ OF 2004 .-:. .^ J ^^vi^tl PETITIONER RESPONDENTS : 1 •••/ ..--y y^' ..• ^yy ^/ ^ ^" ^'^5Tr ^.^" H '^ ^.,. !s fq%-^rl^ 'l ^WW . CHANDRAKANT DANI, AGED ABOUT Ty- YEARS, S/0 SHRI GANAPAT RAO DANI, RESIDENT OF BUDHAPARA, RAIPUR, DISTRICT RAIPUR(C.G.) MARATHA MITRA MANDAL, THROUGH SECRETARY RAVINDRA KUMAR DANI, S/0 MADHUKAR RAO DANI, R/0 BUDHAPARA RAIPUR, DISTRICT RAIPUR (C.G.) BALASHEB, AGED ABOUT @ YEARS, CULTIVATOR, S/0 GANAPATRAO DANI, R/0 BUDHAPARA, RAIPUR (C.G.) DAMAYANTI SHINDE, AGED ABOUT ~^/ YEARS, W/0 SHANKARRAO SHINDE, R/0 TARABAI PARK, KOLHAPUR (MAHARASHTRA) VIJAY SINGH DESHMUSK, S/0 BAPU SAHEB DESHMUKH.(DEAD1 JITENDRA DESHMUKH, AGED ABOUT ^^YEARS, S/0 VUAY SINGH DESHMUKH. R/0 FLAT N0.19,SARLA ROSES 12/2 SOMESHWAR WADI PASHAN,PUNE -28. 7. AMIT DESHMUE^H^AGED ABOUT % YEARS.R/Cy^^b/SHKbLE ROAD, FERNHUSHAN COLLEGE, SfflVAJI NAGAR PUNE (MAHARASHTRA) DHANAJI DESHMUKH, AGED ABOUT ^ YEARS.R/0 FLAT N0. 19,SARLA ROSES 12/2 SOMESHWAR WADI PASHAN PUNE -28(MAHARASHTRA). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA !B 5-$: SBI 3 ^ ©' ;BS?£^Sie';S%s^t XI-HC-22 3TT^T'^T T^jcb ^n^r s»»^icti^n ^or n T^ Barve ^ w^,< ^ % 'Ax "^' 75ET^IT?n^R. "^NPT^, r«ciwy Sf^ 'q^? , ,^....o.(?...^.?.fc^ •I^^T' i^TRdl 5h^l<=b 200 sTT^T'^nw^n 4-1-2005 Shri Prashant Mishra with petitioner. Heard. After addressing the Court,| submitted that the petition may be di] that the suit itself be disposed of afl since 1989 and the triai Court shok observations made in the order disc 39 Rute 1 & 2 of the C.P.C. by th^ Court. i have perused the impugned| The request of learned counsel for thj is pending slnce 1989 and aimost 15| The petition is dismissed aj direeted to dispo^e of the suit as e| months from today. Parties to brinis course they wiil be entitled for th( witnesses, if necessary. While passi shaii not be infiuenced by the observ^ appellate Court while disposing ofthe Parties are entitled for certified <=bHl<rl4t't 'RTR^Tf^ 'fe1^ Tf^R^R ^srf^RSTI^T Shri V.R. Tiwari, counsei for the learned counsel for the petitioner »missedas withdrawn with a direction the earliest, as the same is pending ild not be influenced by any of the osing ofthe application under Order triat Court as weil as the appellate lorder and the connected documents. 1e petitioneris just and fair as the suit lyears' time has elapsed. withdrawn and the triai Court is irly as possible but nof later than 6 their wjtnesses themselves and of- Dasti process for summoning the ilng the main judgment, the trial Court ^tions made by the tria! Court and the Isuit. i |copy of thi^ order. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge [Tft^ ^Hsi^i