IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33137 of 2009 SHANKAR NARAIN MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.09.2009 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and the learned Counsel for the informant. The petitioner is the husband in custody in a complaint case under Sections 498A of the Penal Code in a 20 years old marriage with two adult children aged 14 and 11 years respectively. The impugned order of rejection is in the teeth of the of the guidelines of this Court in the order reported in 2006 (3) PLJR 182 and the judicial adventurism deprecated in respect thereof in the order reported in 2006 (4) PLJR 342.. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM Samastipur in Complaint Case No. 1633 of 2007. Let a copy of this order be forwarded to the Presiding Officer who has passed the impugned order. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)