(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 388 OF 2000 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 388 OF 2000 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 388 OF 2000 Shri. Rajendra Chhotu Yadav ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents ..... Ms. A.S. Prabhu h/f N.V. Bandiwadekar, counsel for Petitioner Mr. K.P. Anilkumar counsel for Respondents 4 and 5. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 14TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 14TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 14TH FEBRUARY, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- . Ms. Prabhu, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that as at present the contempt petition does not survive. Therefore, the same is disposed of as infructuous.