IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 921 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 226 OF 2010 SMT. DEODITA REBELLO AND 2 ORS., ... Applicants Versus SMT. VICENTINA FERNANDES ... Respondent Mr. D. J. Pangam,advocate for the applicants. Mr. V. P. Thali, advocate for the respondent. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 16th December, 2010 P.C; Mr. Thaly learned counsel for the respondent states that he has no objection if the hearing of writ petition no.226 of 2010 is preponed. Mr. Thaly further submits that the basis on which the application has been filed by the applicants for preponing the matter is not correct in as much as the respondent had filed an application seeking declaration of traditional access by application dated 1/9/2008 after disposal of the appeal before the Lower Appellate Court and the same was allowed by the trial court by order dated 15/6/2009. In view of the statement made by Mr. Thaly, I am of the considered opinion that no case has been made out for preponing the hearing of the writ petition. Hence, the application is dismissed. All the rival contentions of the parties are kept open. A. P. LAVANDE, J. ap/-