IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 1814 of 2008. Decided on: 31st May, 2010. Lehna Singh. ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Ashwani Kumar Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral): Petitioner approached the Tribunal with the prayer that he may be regularized in service on completion of eight years of service. Petitioner submits that his case is covered by the decision in Mool Raj Upadhyaya versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, 1994 Supp.(2) SCC 316. Learned Senior Additional Advocate General submits that the petitioner did not have the required mandays for granting the relief. This is disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Be that as it may, whether the petitioner is entitled to regularization in terms of Mool Raj Upadhyay’s case, is to be examined on facts. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed making it clear that in case he has not been granted any relief by the State from the due date, he may file 2 an appropriate representation before the first respondent within a period of two months and his case shall be duly considered by the first respondent in the light of the submissions made therein and appropriate action, in accordance with law, shall be taken within a period three months from the date of production of the copy of the judgment alongwith copy of the writ petition. The petition stands disposed of, so as the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. 31st May , 2010 (bhupender)