:1: bgp bgp bgp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO.301 OF 2004 NO.301 OF 2004 NO.301 OF 2004 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.3406 OF 1993 NO.3406 OF 1993 NO.3406 OF 1993 AND AND AND APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO.382 OF 2004 NO.382 OF 2004 NO.382 OF 2004 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.1900 OF 2002 NO.1900 OF 2002 NO.1900 OF 2002 Keshav K.Gohil ..Appellant Vs. Dinshaw Sorabji Ghandy & Ors. ..Respondents Mr.A.B.Dubey i/b.M/s.Bharat Vaishnawa & Co.for the Appellant. None for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 3RD DECEMBER,2007 : 3RD DECEMBER,2007 : 3RD DECEMBER,2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant. The learned Counsel for the Appellant points out that in view of the consent-terms filed in both the above Appeals, the above Appeals actually stood disposed of. However, the order dated 16th October,2006 does not clearly spell out the same. In view thereof, we make it clear that both the above Appeal Nos.301 of 2004 and 383 of 2004 stand disposed of in terms of the said consent-terms. (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) :2: