\S @°u\0% PETITIONER M. Venkata Raju S!o Late Shri M.V. Brahmananda Rao, Aged around 60 years, Ex Mastar Operative-Cum- Technical, OHP Section of Bhilai Steel Plant, Bhilai, District Durg (CG). Residing at Qr. No. 2-A, HSCL Quarters, Ruwabandha Sector Bhilai, 490001 Tehsil and Disttict Durg (CG). VERSUS . Steel Authority of India Ltd. Through the Chairman, . Bhilai Steel Piant, Through the Managing Director, Bhilai Steel Flam, Ispat Bhwan, Bhilai 490001 District Durg (CG). . The Disability Medical Board, Through its Chairman 3c Director l/c (M&HS) Bhilai Steel Flam, J.L.N. Hospital & Research Centre, Sector 9,‘ Bl1ilai 490009 Dismct Durg (CG). . The Assistant Manager (Personnel-SPS & OHP) Bhilai Steel Plant. Bhilai 490001 District Durg (0G), (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITI J'I‘ION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agiihotri. J.) Steel Authority 0f India Limited, Ispat Bhawan, Lodhi Road, New DeLhi l 10011 I »v l} w Shri Gautam Bhadun', Advocate for the respondents. Present : Shm' B.P. Rao, Advocate for the petitioner. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 01;! of April, 2008) 1. The petitioner, by this petition, has sought for following reliefs : l. "That, the Hon'ble Court be pleased to accept the petition. ll. Thah the Hon‘ble Court be also pleased to decide the petitioner's grievance and pass an order directing the respondents, to pay just and reasonable claimed compensation of Rs. 25,00,000/- (Details as given in the para 5.29) to the petitioner with appropriate interests. lll. Any other order or orders or direction or relief though just and proper in the circumstances of the case may also kindly be granted." 2. The relief, directing the respondents the pay just and reasonable compensation to the petitioner, cannot be granted in writ jurisdiction y ae A I 4 I i r I i HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 3482 of 2007 \ as this involves disputed quastion of factS, which can be considered and decided by the Civil Court. Thus, the. petition is dismissed as n01 maintamable. However, the petitioner is at liberty to take recourse to any other alternative remedy that may be available to him under the provisions of law. \ff 21 Sd/- satish K.Agnihom Judge /