1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. JUDGMENT (Vivek Sharma Vs. Sitaram and anr.) S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.4863/2009 S.B. Civil Misc. appeal under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act against the award dated 02.02.2009 passed by M.A.C.T. And Addl. District & Sessions Judge, (Fast Track) No.3, Jaipur District, Jaipur in claim Case No.990/08(1056/07). DATE OF JUDGMENT ::: 5st OCTOBER, 2009 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH BHAGWATI Mr. Ashok Singh Shekhawat, for the appellant. BY THE COURT: The appellant has filed this appeal for enhancement of amount of compensation. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and perused the impugned award dated 2nd February, 2009 rendered by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jaipur District, Jaipur. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the Tribunal did not take into consideration the grievous injuries sustained by the claimant-appellant and awarded a paltry amount of Rs.9,855/- arbitrarily, which may be enhanced accordingly. 2 The claimant is found to have submitted injury report Ex.24 and X-ray report Ex.25 in support of the injuries he sustained during the accident. X-ray report Ex.25 does not suggest any fracture, hence, all the seven injuries sustained by the claimant have been found to be simple in nature. The grounds of appeal taken by the appellant in the memo of appeal are devoid of any substance. The grounds are illusory and not based on any ocular or documentary evidence. The impugned award is just and proper and does not suffer from any infirmity. It does not warrant any intervention and the appeal deserves to be dismissed at the threshold, which stands dismissed accordingly. (MAHESH BHAGWATI),J. PCG