IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No. 22985 of 2011 Date of decision December 12, 2011 Pardeep Kumar ....... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Harish Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. Notice of motion. 2. At the asking of the Court, Ms. Kirti Singh, DAG., Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the application for grant of money lender's license has not been considered by the authority in spite of the application being sent to the second respondent on 29.5.2009. The decision shall be taken by the respondents on the application of the petitioner for grant of license and communicated to him within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order. 4. The writ petition is disposed of dispensing with notice to the respondents at the stage of admission itself. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE December 12 , 2011 archana