^ QF CHHATTISOARH AT_B|LAS?_UR1 . Bench : Ho'n2b!e Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmykh. J. >-'^ Ap.oejjants Clajmants NorKlalmants .. G M.A.(C.1No.1287/2008 :. 1. Smt Artl Chakravorty', Wd/o Late Sapan Chakravorty, aged about 30 years, 2. iVlithun . Chakravorfr^ S/o Chakravorty, aged about 16 years. 3. Jaideo Chakravorly, S/o Sapan Chakravorty, 'aged. about 13 years, 4. Ku. Shobha Chakrayorty, D/o Sapan Chakravorty, iabout.11 years, Minor appeilant No,2 to 4, through iegai guardlan Mother Smt. Arti Chakravorty-Appeliant No.1. -5. Smt. Snehlata Chakravorty. aged aboutSOyears, i S. Surendra Nath Chakravorty, S/'o late Baninath Chakravorfr/, Aii Resident of Biock No.20, Qr.No. 13, Mana Camp, Tahsi! and DJstrict Raipur (C.G.) 1. Sukumar S/o Santosh a-ged about 38 years, R/o Omdham Coiony, Mana Camp, Tahsi! and District Raipur (C.G.) 2. The New India .jnsurance Co. Ltd., - through ' Dlvlsionai 'Manager, Dlvjsionai Office No.2, Jeevan Bima iVtarg, Pandari, Raipur, District Raipur" (C.G.) 173 of the 1994. Ereseni :n Shri A. L. Sjngroui, counsel fbr the appeiiants. Shri Shree Kumar Agrawai, Senior Advocate with Shri A. K. Gupta, counse! for respondent 'No.2/insurer. (Passed on this 30th day of September, 2008) Heard on admission. -2-- ^) (2) ' The appeilants/clalmants are' aggrieved by an award dated 22-07-2008 passed by the 10th Additiona! Motor Accidents Ciaims Tnbunai, F.T.C., Raipur (henceforth "the Tribunaf5) In Claim Case No.41/2008 whereby compensatjon of Rs.3,91 ,GOO/- was awarded in a death case, (3) The sole ~ ground urged by learned counsei- for the appeilants/claimants in thls appeal is that the Tribunal has not awarded cornpensation under the conventionai heads of consortlum and loss ofioveand (4) Shri Shree Kumar Agrawa!, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of respondent No.2/insurer did not oppose the appea! on the said prayer. (5) During the course of arguments, a settiernent was arrived at whereunder the insurance company to pay a-sum of Rs.25,OOOA to the appellants/ciajmants ov'er and above the arnount aiready awarded b-y the Tribunal by depositlng the same within a period of two months frorn today and prayed that appeal be disposed of on the same terms and conditlons. (6) Shri A. L. Singroul, learned counsel for the appeilants agrees to the settiernent. (7) In vlew of the settlement arrived at, the award passed by the Tribunai Is modified and an addltional sum of Rs.25,000/- over and above the sum already awarded by th©Tribuna! is awarded as compensation to the appeilant. The respondent No.2/insurance company shail deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- wsth the Tribunal v/ithin a period of two months frorrL today. ^te! -3- (8) With the aforesald directlon, the misceiianeous appeal stands dlsposed of. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge Tunisns 'c' >-^ € H9