HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.308 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: In view of the fact that pay slip is now issued and as the main writ petition filed by the petitioner is still pending, no final orders can be passed. 2. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that his pay slip ought to have been issued showing him as a ‘casual labourer’, whereas it was issued showing him as a ‘contract labourer’. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent Corporation – APSRTC contends that even earlier also as per the writ petitioner, he was only a contract labourer. 4. The order for non-implementation of which the contempt case is filed is that pay slip shall be issued. As pay slip is issued to the petitioner now and respondent Corporation has taken him into service, the question whether the petitioner should be treated as ‘contract labourer’ or ‘casual labourer’ can be decided in the main writ petition only. 5. With the above observations, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. ______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J September 7, 2010. PV