1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. O R D E R JETHA RAM & ORS. Vs. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN. S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No.677/2010 under section 397/401 Cr.P.C. against the order dated 04.08.2010 passed by the learned Addl.Sessions Judge, Ratangarh in Sessions Case No. 2/2010 . ............... Date of Judgment: 14th December, 2010 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH CHANDRA JOSHI Mr.Suresh Kumbhat for the petitioners. Ms.Chandra Lekha , Public Prosecutor. BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the impugned order dated 04.08.2010 passed by the learned Addl.Sessions Judge, Ratangarh in Sessions Case No. 2/2010 whereby the learned trial court has framed charges against the petitioners under section 2 452,323, 323/34, 307 and 307/34 IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that charges have been framed by the learned trial court without scrutiny of record and without discussing any evidence or relevant facts. Learned counsel for the petitioner relied on the judgment of this Court in Ramdeo & Anr. vs. State of Rajasthan [1993 (18) R.Cr.C. 412] and Mohan Lal Rao & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan [R.C.C.2008 (3)1102]. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Public Prosecutor, this Court is satisfied that the impugned order does not meet the requirement of framing the charges, after showing due application of mind by the learned trial court. Accordingly, the order impugned dated 04.08.2010, is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the trial court for framing the charges by passing a speaking order discussing the relevant facts and evidence which has not been done while passing 3 the order impugned. Accordingly the present revision petition is disposed of. (KAILASH CHANDRA JOSHI),J. l.george