[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION W.P.NO.1604 OF 2005 Prakash R.Pawar and Anr. ..Petitioner Vs. Station Superintendent and Ors. ..Respondents ... None for Petitioner Mr.Suresh Kumar Advocate for Respondents ... CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : JULY 13, 2006 DATE : JULY 13, 2006 DATE : JULY 13, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. When the matter was called out, none present for the petitioners. On behalf of Respondent, learned counsel points out that in view of the order passed by this Court, whatever has been payable, has been paid to the petitioners. Petitioners are demanding further amounts. There are serious disputes about the right of the petitioners to receive any further amounts and involves disputed questions of law. Considering that, in our opinion, this is not a fit case to exercise our extra ordinary writ [-2-] jurisdiction. However, it will be open to the petitioners to take out appropriate civil proceedings. In view of the above, petition is disposed of accordingly. [ F.I.REBELLO, J.] [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]