IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPU R w. p. No. 4*440 OF 2005 PETI IONE x“ S.K.Gupta, Aged about 45 years, S/o Late Shri M.P.Gupta, Chief Executive Officer [suspended] Janpad Panchayat, Batauii, Tehsii Sitapur, District Su'rguja, Chhattisgarh V ERSUS RESPONDENTS /1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Government of Chhattisgarh Tribal Development Deptt. DKS Bhawan, Mantraiaya Raipur Chhattisgarh / 2. CommiSSiOner Tribal Development Chhattisgarh Raipur, Chhattisgarh / 3. Collector Ambikapur DistrictSurguja Chhattisgarh /4. Project Administrator ‘ Integ rated Tribal Development, Surguja, District Surguja (CG) 5. Assistant Commissioner Tribal Development, Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh ‘/ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA / XI-HC-78 .Q..;I’.‘k§?;.f£fif1.9 mum aizn'm mzom” mam (1am?) the Constitution of India, th€ p titi0n€r has Challengsd tha legalit 0f his suspension order dated O 8.2005 (Annexufe P— 1). After perusal of the order it appears that the aforesaid order (1) ‘(Ka) of the Chhattisgarh Civil and Appeal) Rules 1966. There is such an order passed under the has beenpassed under rule. Services (Classification, Control a provision of appeal against aforesaid Rules. Since there is all altei petitioner, I am not inclined to petition is dismissed. However, to file an appropriate appeal accordance with law. This writ petition stands ii Accordingly, M.W. R36 14/ native remedy available to the interfere in the writ petition. The the petitioner would be at liberty before appropriate authority in nally disposed of. 2005 alsoistands disposed of. 5d]- Sunil Kumar Sinha j Judge l y maimw madam mermaids! Wams’wm $W3né¥1 06.10.2005 Shri Sanjay Kumar Agrawal, counsel for the petitioner. Shn' Arun Sao, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the State on advance copy. > Heard. By way of this writ petitio i tiled under Article 226f 227 of