IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.54433-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION:3.11.2006 Asha Rani & An. ..........Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ..........Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present:- Shri D.S. Pheruman, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri N.S. Gill, AAG, Punjab. **** Petitioners Asha Rani and Jagdish Raj apprehending their arrest in a non-bailable offence in case FIR No. 157 dated 18.7.2004 under Sections 304-B/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Chherata, District Amritsar, have filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail. I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the FIR. Counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners, who are father-in-law and sister-in-law (Nanad) of the deceased, were found innocent during the police investigation and the challan was filed only against the husband and mother-in-law. The petitioners were kept in column No.2. Subsequently, during the trial, after examination of the complainant, the petitioners were summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C. Counsel for the petitioners further contends that in view of the order dated 12.9.2006, the petitioners have appeared before the trial Court and have furnished their regular bail bonds, which have been accepted and Crl. Misc. No.54433-M of 2006 -2- attested and since then they are regularly appearing before the trial Court. Counsel for the respondent-State on instructions from Balbir Singh, Head Constable does not dispute these facts. In view of the above, the interim bail, granted vide order dated 12.9.2006 is made absolute. Disposed of accordingly. November 3, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) pooja JUDGE