Kambli 1 wp1265.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1265 OF 2010 ... Sadanand Shivram Jadhav and ors. ..Petitioners v/s. State of Maharashtra & ors. ..Respondents ... Mr.P.M.Pradhan i/b Mr.V.K.Damle & Mr.K.S.Dubey for the petitioners. Mr.Niranjan P.Pandit AGP for the Respondents Nos.1 & 2. Mr.D.D.Madon, Sr.Counsel with Mr.Rajiv Narula, Mr.A.Dasgupta i/b Jhangiani Narula & Associates for Respondent No.3. Mr.P.K.Dhakephalkar, Sr.Counsel with Mr.A.V.Jain & Ms.Laxmi Jessami i/b A.V.Jain & Associates for Respondent No.4. ... CORAM: D.K.Deshmukh & N.D.Deshpande,JJ DATED: 29th September, 2010 Kambli 2 wp1265.10 P.C.: 1. By this petition the Petitioners challenge the order passed by the Scrutiny Committee dated 31st March, 2010 holding that the claim of the Petitioner No.1 that he belongs to (Malhar Koli) Schedule Tribe Caste is not valid. 2. We have heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioners at length. We have perused the record. Perusal of the record shows that the Scrutiny Committee has considered every relevant documents in detail and has recorded a finding of fact. The scrutiny committee has found that in the school record of the period pre-1950, the entires in relation to the Petitioner’s father and his other relatives are not that they belong to Malhar Koli caste. The learned Counsel for the Petitioners relied on the school leaving Kambli 3 wp1265.10 certificate of Shri Ramchandra B. Jadhav, who claims to be the real uncle of the Petitioner No.1. That certificate has been considered by the Scrutiny Committee and it has found that the record has been tampered with. The scrutiny committee consists of experts on the subject. After that expert body considers the entire record and records its finding, we will not be justified in interfering with the same in the extra ordinary jurisdiction of this court. Petition is, therefore, rejected. (D.K.Deshmukh, J.) (N.D.Deshpande, J.)