C.R. No.5934 of 2009 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.5934 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 5.8.2010 Tarlochan Singh ……Petitioner VERSUS Punjab State Electricity Board and others ……Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH -.- Present: Mr. Sumeet Mahajan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Amit Kohar & Mr. Sham Lal Bhalla, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Verma, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.4. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. Present petition is filed challenging the orders passed by the Courts below on an application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 C.P.C. C.R. No.5934 of 2009 (O&M) -2- 2. All the learned Counsel appearing for the parties fairly state that present petition be decided with consent in the following terms:- i) Parties shall maintain status-quo pertaining to the con- nection in dispute during the pendency of the suit; ii) Petitioner/plaintiff shall keep on paying the consump- tion charges raised by the respondents; iii) No unnecessary adjournment shall be sought from the learned trial Court and both the parties shall make their best efforts for early disposal of the suit; iv) A joint request shall be made to the learned trial Court to expedite the hearing of the suit and in any case to de- cide the suit finally within six months from today. 3. Petition stands disposed of with the consent of learned Counsel for the parties in the aforesaid terms. ( ALOK SINGH ) 05th August, 2010 JUDGE ashish