(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 484 OF 2011 Namdeo s/o. Madhav Mali, Age : 55 years, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Mendha, Taluka & District : Osmanabad. .. Petitioner. versus 1. The State of Maharashtra. 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Civil Supply, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad. 3. The District Supply Officer, Osmanabad, Dist. Osmanabad. .. Respondents. ....................... Mrs. M.A. Kulkarni, Advocate, holding for Mr. A.M. Kulkarni, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. N.B. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos.1 to 3. ........................ (2) CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 24TH JANUARY 2011 COURT'S ORDER : 1. Mrs. M.A. Kulkarni, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, states that as revision is already dismissed, present petition may be allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to challenge the order of dismissal of revision before appropriate forum. 2. Mr. N.B. Patil, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, is opposing grant of liberty. 3. In the circumstances, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of, as such, with liberty to challenge the order of dismissal of revision before appropriate forum. ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp484