@iéwé‘auL gnaw»? @ ‘ i/ /‘ / 1 i ();)> IV} a '2‘. ‘ IN THE HIGH COURT O-F JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (ca) w.P.(S) No. 15033 12009 PETITIONER Smt. Sanju Shrivastava O W/o Chandrahas Shrivastava, Aged about 42 years, R/o Street-3, Nirala Chowk, Kasaridih Durg, Tah. and Distt. Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER 'ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OR MANDAMUS/DIRECTION OR OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT. VERSUS ‘ RESPONDENTS 1) State of Chhattisgarh v4 ‘ Through — The Secretary Ministry of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) . The Commissioner, Public Instruction, Raipur (C.G.) The Education Officer, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) /‘ 3) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH :IBILASPUR WRIT PETlTfON §S) NO‘6059 OF 2009 PETITIONFR Smt. Sanju Shrivastava Versus State of Chhattisgarh & others (Writ Petition under Arficle 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon‘ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. RESPONDENTS ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 12m day of AuQ ust, 201 1) 1. Heard learned counsei for the parties. 2, By this petition, the petitioner seeks to challenge the tegality and validity of the order dated 9-9-2009 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Durg Block to Gunderdehi Block. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the petitioner has already continued at the original place of posting for more than 2O months on account of interim order dated 23-10-2009 granted by this Court. The State/respondents may be granted liberty to pass appropriate orders keeping in View public interest and administrative exigency. Learned counsel further submits that the State/respondents shall not insist upon compliance of the impugned order dated 9-9-2009. It is accordingly ordered. 4-. Since no effect could be given to the impugned order dated 9-9—2009 on account of the interim order dated 23—10-2009, it is not necessary to go into the legality and validity of the impugned order dated 9-9-2009, in the facts of the case. 5. ln view of the above, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication atathis stage. 6. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. / Sdl- l Satish i l Gown / K. Agnimu” Judg?