^ HIGH C< iRTOFCMHATTISGARU A Wrlt Pstition (Art.227'i No.2941 if2""! £sW Petltlor.er Piaintiff Respondsrsts Non-applicants Ramnarayan Nishad, 3/o. BhurAa Nishad, aged about 50 years, R/o. Kuieiabhatha, District Dura (C.G.) snd VS/Su'S Gvf^Lr/?<** ir^ i <ar\uoi i Dani, Premuial, aged about 45 years, Sunii Dani, S/o. Premulal aged aboui 43 vears Boih R/o. Viiiage Banbarad, Poilce Station Nandani, Tahssi Dhamdha, (Ahiwara), District Durg (C.G.) aftlsgarh 3- State or CoSSector, Durg (C.G.) CWrit PstltloR under Artlcie 227 of the Consiitution of indla) ivir.H.B.Agrav.-ai, Senior Advocate with Ms Sahna S<han, counss 4'S^*-^ »^/>'frS^i^Mi^^Lr (.! ivs Sj^liliv^i id . Mr.Rahui Tamrakar, counsei for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr.Akhi! Agrawai, Panel Lav»yerfor respondent No.S/Stats. (SB: Hon'bie T ,F"« ^SBCTiBB ORDER (30-11-2011) 1. By thjs ••vrit petltion undsr Articie 226 & 227 of the Constifutlon of india the petiiloner has chsiienged the iegaiity and propriety of ihe order dated 25.4.2011 passed by the 8 Civil Judge Ciass-ii, Durg, in Civii Suit N0.183A/2010, whereby the 8[h Civii Judge Ciass-ii has stayed the mytation proceeding on the basis of appiication fiiea on behair of the defenSsnts/respondents No.1 snd 2 under Section 151 of the Code of Clvii Procedure. 2. i havs heard learned counsei for the parties, perused the order impugned, copy or the appiicatlon and other documents fiied on behalf of thep -^- 3. Injunciion appiication rlied on bshaif of ihe pstitionsr 'nas beers dismfesed by ths trlai Court, buf OR the basis of appiicatEon fiied on behalf of the defendants/respondenis No.1 snd 2 ihe triai Court ihas staysd the pendlng before the revsnue Courts. Present respondents fi syffi Hi& No.1 and 2 have not Ried any counter-ciaim or suit, rso reHef hss besn ciaimed by them. in thsse circumsiances, there wss no propristy for entsrtainlng such appiicaiion and staying revenue proceeding. By passing such order ths irial Court has committed grave [jiegaiity. 4. Consequeniiy, fhe writ petifion is aiiowed and ordsr impugned to the extent of staying the proceeding of revenue Courts is hereby quashed. However, respondents No.1 and 2 are at tiberty to ciaim and redress iheir grievancss bsrore ihe triai Couri: in appropriate manner, if they so wish and ciaim appropriaie protection avaiia&ie under the iaw. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P.Sharma Judge ^