mam r” ”’2/ BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WritPetition s No. M; 200 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT / WRITS, ORDER / ORDERS, DIRECTION '/ DIRECTIONS, IN FORM OF MANDAMUS / CERTIORARI / PROHIBITION / QUO-WARRANTO ETC. PETITIONER / Sml. Shardo Lonhore, wife of shri Chondrobhushcn Lonhore, aged about 38 years, Resident of ‘1. Singarpur, Post Office — Forodfore & Police Station — Dewri, Tahsil W ”a) (” 9 w Dondi—Lohqrq, Dis’rt Durg (CG) GR‘ g. ‘0 VERSUS R ESPONDENTS /, I . State of Chhattisgarh, through e ary, Depar ma nd ild ar th Secret tment of Won a Ch Welfe, Dau Kyn Sin Bhawan, Raipur (C. The Collct eor, Distt. Durg (C.G.) T Chie Executive Officer, tegre Chi Doent he, und Lohar fi at Dnd Lr, Dist. Dur (CG) /4 Th Proct Officer, Iee ilv Develont me di—Lara, Tah Daundl— Lohara, Distt. g C. It / ala gh .G) he f Inatd ld evelpm Scme Dal a, Ofce aui ohaa t g . e je ntgratd Chd pme Sche Donoh Dur (G.) mmwfCSJ44Z/é7m2oo ‘mm (W) mimfaaw WWW WWW WW wmm animm \ SB: Hon Mr Justice Pritinker Diwaker 23.10.2010: Shri Pravin Dhurandhar coun el for the petitioner. Shri Ajit Singh PL for respond nts 1, 2 and 4. Shri Arun Sao counsel for res ondent No.3. At the out-set, counsel for he petitioner submits that the petitioner is required to challenge th order dated 20.9.2006 passed by the Chief Executive Officer by hich the petitioner has been removed from the post of Anganwa i Worker and therefore he may be permitted to withdraw this peti on with liberty to file a fresh petition. Counsel for the respond ‘ts have no objection-to this prayer of the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. Sd/- ‘ Pritinker Diwakerl Judge l “‘\ J l W eats garment, wafer ta ——Fsn 47—2/201 o —1 ,uo,ooo. \