IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 1ST JULY 2008 / 10TH ASHADHA 1930 FAO.No. 140 of 2006() --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED / / IN IA 1879/2005. IN OP.58/2002 of PRL.SUB COURT,TRIVANDRUM .................... APPELLANT/PETITIONER. -------------------------------------- B.LAILA BEEVI, AGED 42, PRASANTH BHAVAN, GOLF VILLA, SREEKARIYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.R.ANANDAKUTTAN SRI.B.SATHIQ SRI.R.S.MADHU SRI.MAHESH ANANDAKUTTAN RESPONDENTS: COUNTER PETITIONER. -------------------------------- 1. MANVILA BANKERS, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SHERAFUNISA BEEVI, MANVILA BUILDING, KULATHOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SHERAFUDDIN, LAILA MANZXIL, T.B.JUNCTION, NEYYATTINKARA. 3. SHAFINA, LAILA MANZIL, T.B.JUNCTION, NEYYATTINKARA. 4. SHEHRUDDIN, KUDAPPANAMOODU, VELLARADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. SHAHIDA BEEVI, KUDAPPANAMOODU, VELLARADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6. SHERFUNNISA BEEVI, KADAVILA HOUSE, OPPO.K.S.E.B. ROASE NAGAR, SREEKARIYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 7. SHEREEF, RESEARCH CANCER CENTRE, MEDICAL COLLEGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 8. ANJANA SHERIF, CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA, KANIYAPURAM BRANCH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 9. SHAJUDDIN, PENPERT, VELLAIKADAVU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 10. SUHRA BEEVI, PENPERT, VELLAIKKADAVU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 11. SULFIKER, SALUJA MANIDARAM, ALAYAMON VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 12. BHASKARAN, SRE BHAVAN, KALLIYOOR, VELLARADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.B.PRADEEP FOR R4&7 SRI.K.B.PRADEEP FOR R5 & 6 THIS FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDERS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.Raman & T.R. Ramachandran Nair, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - F.A.O.No.140 of 2006 - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 1st day of July, 2008. JUDGMENT Raman, J. This is an appeal against an order rejecting the application to sue as an indigent person. Notice was ordered as early as in June, 2006. Notice to respondent No.2 returned with endorsement “expired”. Notice to respondent Nos.3 and 5 returned with endorsement “addressee left”. No steps taken so far. The appeal is therefore dismissed for non-prosecution. ( P.R.Raman, Judge.) (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/