COCP No.2024 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2024 of 2008 Date of Decision:30.07.2009 Jasbir Singh .... petitioner Versus M.K.Gupta, Engineer-in-Chief, Haryana Irrigation Department, PKL. .....respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Mr.Saurav Dalal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.S.K.Hooda, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent **** RAKESH KUMAR GARG J.(ORAL): The grouse of the petitioner is that a direction was given to the Engineer-in-Chief , Haryana Irrigation Department to consider the representation of the petitioner for providing them a path by way of over- bridge or otherwise. However, nothing was done by the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner. In reply to the show cause notice issued by this Court, short reply by way of affidavit of Sh.R.K.Diwan, Engineer-in-Chief, Haryana Irrigation Department, Panchkula, has been filed in which it has been submitted that the representation of the petitioner has been considered and construction of the bridge in question has been approved. It has been further stated that subordinate authorities were directed to send the necessary estimates, site plan etc. for the aforesaid purpose. It has also been mentioned that since all the formalities have been completed, the construction work is likely to be started very shortly. It has also been mentioned in the aforesaid reply that necessary path to the petitioner has COCP No.2024 of 2008 2 been provided to ingress and outgress to his fields and there is no hindrance for passing through the minor in question. In view of the aforesaid stand taken by the respondent, I am not inclined to proceed further in this contempt petition. Rule discharged. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 30.07.2009 neenu