IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND APRIL 2008 / 13TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 11264 of 2008(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ BENU IYPE V.A., W/O.SHIBU K.THOMAS, AGED 37 YEAS, HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (PHYSICAL SCIENCE), ST. MARY'S HIGH SCHOOL, NIRANAM, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, TRIVANDRUM-14. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PATHANAMTHITTA AT THIRUVALLA. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 5. THE MANAGER, ST. MARY'S HIGH SCHOOL, NIRANAM, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY G.P. SMT.T.B.REMANI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No.11264 of 2008 ================== Dated this the 2nd day of April, 2008 J U D G M E N T The petitioner was eligible for promotion as H.S.A. The same was granted by Ext.P1 order dated 11.6.2007. The petitioner submits that the petitioner should have been given that promotion with effect from 1.6.2005. In the above circumstances, the petitioner has filed Ext.P2 review petition before the 1st respondent seeking salary for the past period also. The petitioner now seeks a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2, in the light of Ext.P3. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there would be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2 review petition, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as the manager of the w.p.c.11264/08 2 school. It would be open to the petitioner to rely upon Ext.P3 or any other material in support of her case, in which case, the 1st respondent shall decide the applicability of the same also to the petitioner's case. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition along with a certified copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge