IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.11341 of 2009 Between: Y.V. Ramana @ Karri Venkata Ramana W/o. Durga Prasad R/o. Sanivarapupeta Village, Eluru Mandal, West Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary to (Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs (CS-I) Department, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2 Tahsildar, Eluru Mandal, West Godavari District. 3 G. Mahesh S/o. Not known Sanivarapupeta Village, Eluru Mandal, West Godavari District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 & 2:AGP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES ORDER: Though the petitioner questioned panchanama, dated 10.05.2009, under which, stocks from his fair price shop have been seized, at the hearing, Sri N.Satyanarayana, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that while the petitioner is not pressing the said relief, the action of the respondents to the extent of non-supply of essential commodities to the petitioner’s fair price shop on the ground of seizure is questioned. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies, on instructions, submitted that so far, no order has been passed suspending the petitioner’s fair price shop authorization. So long as his authorization is not suspended, varied or cancelled, the petitioner cannot be denied supply of essential commodities. Therefore, the writ petition is allowed to this extent by directing respondent No.2 to continue the supply of essential commodities to the petitioner so long as his authorization is not suspended or cancelled. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 12th JUNE, 2009. kvni