)/• ''fff HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGABH AT BILASPUR PETmONER Writ.Petiten.No, 2048 of2001 Govind Agrawal, S/o Prafalad Rai Agrawal, a; about 41 yeans, R/o Sahdeq)ali, Raigarh. VERSUS RESPONDENTS :Sahtt 1. State of Chhattisgarii through the Secretary Departmeiit ofExcise, Mantralaya, D.K. Bhawan, Raipur. 2. Tlie Ccamnissioner Excise, Chhattisgarii, Raipur. 3. The Collectw (Excise), Raigarh. 4. The Disfrict Excise OfBcer, Raigarh. 5. The Collecter (Excise) Raipur. 6. The District Excise Qffica-, Raipur. 7. TheCoUector(Excise)Durg. 8. The District Excise Qfficer, Durg. 9. Tlie Collector (Excise), Mahasamund. 10. The District Excise QfBeer Mahasamund. 11. The Collector (Excise) Dhamtari. 12. The Disfaict Excise OfiGcer, Dhamtari. 13. The Collector (Excise) Rajnandgaon. 14.The District Excise Officer, Rajaandg^on. (WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hxm'Me Mr. Satish K. AgnflNrtri, J.) Present : Shri B.D. Guru, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Vivek Shrama, Panel Lawyer for fhe State. ORDER (Passcd on flris irf" ofNovanber, 2007) (1) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitifflier submits that with fhe passage of time, this petiticm has become infiuetuous, to wiuch leamed eounsel appearing for the State/respondettfs has no objection. (2) It .is ordered accardingly. (3) Accordingly, Ihe writ petiticna is disamssed as hawng bec»me infitictuous. No ordw as to costs. Sd/- satish K. Agnihotri Judge