IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA MONDAY, THE 19TH JULY 2010 / 28TH ASHADHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 4302 of 2010() ----------------------------- CP.49/2009 of J.M.F.C.-II, ALUVA CRIME NO.155/02 OF ANGAMALY POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM. .................... (S): PETITIONER ------------------------------ VIPIN, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O.DEVASSYKUTTY, NEDUVELLY VEEDU,EDAKUNNUKARA, KARUKUTTY, ERNAKULAM BY ADV. SRI.ANIL K.MOHAMMED RESPONDENT(S): --------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.HEMA, J. ---------------------------------------------- Bail Application No.4302 of 2010 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 19th July, 2010. O R D E R This petition is for bail. 2. The alleged offences are under Sections 341, 326, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. According to prosecution, on 4.3.2002 at about 4.45 p.m., while defacto complainant was riding a motor cycle, petitioner (A1), along with second accused intercepted the vehicle and attacked defacto complainant with an iron rod and thereby committed the various offences stated above. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that petitioner did not receive any summons at the committal stage. He is released on bail in the other cases, it is submitted 4. This petition is opposed. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the crime is registered as early as in 2002 and petitioner jumped bail, even though he was granted bail at the crime stage. For the past about 8 years, he was absconding and he could be arrested only on 16.6.2010, a month before. It is also submitted that petitioner is involved in series of criminal cases of BA NO. 4302/10 2 similar nature and he was successful in absconding and evading process. If petitioner is granted bail, it is likely that he will abscond. 5. On hearing both sides, I am satisfied of the submissions made by the learned Public Prosecutor and I do not think that it is fit to grant bail to petitioner at this stage. Petitioner may move the court concerned for expeditious disposal of the case, in accordance with law. If there is any considerable delay in disposal of the case, he is at liberty to apply for bail again before the lower court itself. Petition is dismissed. K.HEMA, JUDGE. tgs