IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27456 of 2008 CHAITU YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 16.7.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. The only reason which has been indicated for filing a fresh application for anticipatory bail is that one of the co- accused has been enlarged on bail till filing of the chargesheet. But that may not be good enough for this Court to reconsider its earlier order which has given adequate opportunity to petitioner to buy his freedom by getting certificate from the complainant in the court below that the money in question has already been paid as is sought to be established by certain materials on record. There is no merit in this application to reconsider the prayer for anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)