Petitioners 1) Smt. Neeta Tamrakar, aged 39 years, W/o. Shri Rajesh Tamrakar, Assistant Teacher, Truwar Chaya, Near Hanuman Mandir, Dhimar Para, Distt. Durg (CG). 2) Ku. Vinita Thakur, aged 33 years, Die. Shii Bhuneshwa: Singh Thakur, Assistant Teacher, Govt. (Purva) Middle School, Mordongri, District Kanker (CG). Versus Respondents 1) ‘ The State Government of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Education & Tribai Department, D.K.S. Bhaven, Raipur (CG). 2) The District Education Officer, Durg/Kanker {CG). 3) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Department, Kanker (CG). 4) Block . Education Omcer, Burg/Kanker. (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia) SB: Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Somkant Verma, counsel for the petitioners. Smt. Binu Sharma, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL omen - (Passed en 9‘“ January, 2908) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the fact and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in Yashwant Kumarr Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another {2006 (ii) MPJR -CG 96}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 3-4-2006. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents does net controvert the said submission. in subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (S) No. 41 30 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Verma Vs. The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and another) and other connected matters, decided by this Court on 15-12-2006. pursuant to the memo dated 28T1-1 995, issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopai and the prospectus of Diploma in Education Examination, it was clarified that the nomenclature of the Basic Training institute i.e., B.T.l., has been changed and renamed as Diploma in Education,‘i.e., DEd. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S) No. 4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Venns Vs. The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and another (supra). Accordingly, the writ petition is aiiowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipai Corporation, Durg and another (supra), subject to veritication of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired D.Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-1 2-1 998 and further whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No ordef as to 7 costs. Sd/- , Satish K. Agnihotri Judge