IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35211 of 2010 SUCHIT KUMAR CHOUDHARY @ CHULBULI @ SUJIT CHAUDHARY, SON OF NARAYAN CHAUDHARY @ SOPARI CHAUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 18.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Didarganj P.S. Case No. 72 of 2009 registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Although, petitioner is not named in the First Information Report, but from perusal of the impugned order, it appears that he has been identified in Test Identification Parade. Although, learned counsel for the petitioner tried to convince me about the innocence of the petitioner by placing argument that the aforesaid Test Identification Parade was held after three months of the alleged occurrence, but I am not, at all, convinced with his submission. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )