IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14864 of 2009 1. BAIJU MAHTO 2. Jagmaya Devi 3. Seema Kumari 4. Funni Kumar Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 30.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that victim was in love with Dinesh Kumar which can be clarified from the letters sent by the victim to Dinesh Kumar. However, after recovery, she examined under Section 164 Cr. P.C. also and named these petitioners and ultimately, Dinesh Kumar took her and whatever he intended did. Police submitted final form against these petitioners showing them innocence, even then cognizance has been taken and they are apprehending their arrest, which can never be justified. Dinesh Kumar has already been allowed Regular Bail by a Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 13845 of 2007. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No. 170 of 2006, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)