IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17581 of 2010 CHANDRAKET PD.SINGH Versus THE B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY MUZAFFARPUR & ORS with CWJC No.18113 of 2010 PROF.ANIRUDH ROY Versus THE B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY & ORS. with CWJC No.18346 of 2010 PROF.SMT.RENU SINHA Versus THE B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY & ORS . with CWJC No.18463 of 2010 PROF.IRFAN AHMAD KHAN Versus THE B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY &ORS . with CWJC No.18574 of 2010 DR.VIDYAWATI SAHU Versus THE B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY &ORS . with CWJC No.19089 of 2010 NAGENDRA PRASAD THAKUR Versus THE B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY MUZAFFARPUR & ORS . with CWJC No.19143 of 2010 KARELAL MANJHI . Versus THE B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY &ORS . with CWJC No.20682 of 2010 UMA SHANKAR MAHTO . Versus THE B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY & ORS . with CWJC No.168 of 2011 JANAK PD.SINGH MITHILESH . Versus THE B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY & ORS . with CWJC No.741 of 2011 SAWITRI DEVI . Versus THE B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY & ORS . with 2 CWJC No.1009 of 2011 MAHERNDRA PRASAD SINGH Versus THJE B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY & ORS with CWJC No.2985 of 2011 MD.NAZIR SIDDIQUI Versus THE B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERCITY & ORS . ----------- 02. 18.03.2011 Heard the parties. In all the writ applications there is a common grievance that despite detailed claim of the arrears under various heads have been worked out and certified as such by the concerned Principals, the University has not taken steps for payment of their dues. The outstanding arrears are coming from one decade to another and there is no apparent reason why the claim should not be verified and payments made since State authorities have been releasing funds quite regularly to the University for payment of dues of the teachers. Since question is of verification of accounts and payments and no dispute as such has been pointed out, all these writ applications are disposed of with a clear direction upon the Vice Chancellor/Acting Vice Chancellor, as the case may be, to process the claim of the petitioners and take steps for payment of their dues within a period of four months from the date of production /communication of this order. It is made clear that if any part of the claim is not accepted by the University, the concerned petitioner would be 3 informed as to the reason for such a refusal. This too must be done in the above time frame. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)