6 (^- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH ATBILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Cl No. ^_<z> ^O OF 2011. PETITIONER fyy ^^! "^.--' Ayodhya Singh, Son of late Shri Rain Nagina Singh, aged about 64 years, Resident of Subhash Nagar, Telibandha, Mother Teresa Ward, Post Ravigram, Raipur, District Raipur, (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS I/^WMA^ ^^ " <"^\. jf^ ^"^\ ^(S.S^^StJ^ } ^^^tJ \ ^TA 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Urban Administration, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^^ 2. Collector, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. MunicipalCorporation, Raipur, Through : It's Commissioner, Jaisthamb Chowk, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 4. Zone Commissioner, Zone No. 4, Raipur Municipal Corporation, Jaisthamb Chowk, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) ^^^^ss'^^'B'-y':^^ / 5. ExecutiveEngineer(Project) Zone No. 4, Raipur Municipal Corporation, Jaisthamb Chowk, Raipur District Raipur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA lf ^.•^ Amit HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPLTR PETITIONER WRfr PETITION (C} No. 2320 of2011 Avodhva Smgh. RESPONDENTS VERSUS State ofClihattisgarh & Otliers. WSIi PEimON UNDER ARTICL.E 226 OF THE CONSTITUriON OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Present: ShriV.K.Pandey, Advocate forthepetitioner. Sht-i V.V.S.Moorthy, Deputy Advocate General forthe StateA'espondent No. 1 and 2. Shri H.B.Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Smt. Meera Jaiswal, Advocate for the respondent No. 3 and 4. (Passed on 04th day ofMay, 2011) Leained counsel appearing for the respondent No. 3 aiid 4 subniits that there is no contemplation to demolish the disputed structure of the petitioner, situated at Khasra No. 50//1, measuring 2400 sq.ft. at Subhash Nagar, Motlier Teresa Ward, Telibandha, Raipur. However, whenever it is contemplated or decided to take anv action for demolition oftlie said stnieture, tlie petitioner would be given a proper shovv cause notice and after considering the reply of the petitioner- action shall be takcti, ifany. In view of the foregoing, according to leamed counsel for the petitioner, notliing sun'ives for adjudication in this petition. Accordmgly, the writ petition is disposed of. \ • sd/" 'Satish^-- Judge -~r