IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.PADMANABHAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 1ST FEBRUARY 2008 / 12TH MAGHA 1929 AS.No. 476 of 1995(C) --------------------- OS.47/1993 of SUB COURT, KASARAGOD .................... APPELLANT: 2nd DEFENDANT: ----------- THE KASARGOD TALUK AUTORICKSHAW DRIVERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., KASARGOD, BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADV. SRI.U.P.KUNIKULLAYA RESPONDENTS: PLAINTIFF & DEFENDANTS 1 AND 3 TO 8 ------------- 1. STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, KASARGOD BRANCH, KASARGOD, REP. BY ITS MANAGER. 2. C.CHANDRASEKHARAN, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O.CHANDUKUTTY, HINDU, DRIVER, RESIDING AT CHEEKODU, MULIYAR VILLAGE, P.O.KOTOOR (VIA) KASARGOD, KASARGOD TALUK AND DISTRICT. 3. K.T.SRIDHARA, AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.KANDAN, HINDU, TEACHER, RESIDING AT 'SARITHA NIVAS', THERUVATH, THALANGARA VILLAGE AND POST, KASARGOD TALUK AND DISTIRCT. 4. B.BHASKARAN, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.KORAGA CHETTIAR, HINDU, DRIVER, RESIDING AT SHARADA NAGAR, ANANGOOR, KASARGOD P.O. KASARGOD TALUK AND DISTRICT. 5. K.N.RAMAKRISHNA, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O.T.K.NARAYANAN, HINDU, DRIVER, RESIDING AT KABEKODU HOUSE, NARAYANAMANGALAM, P.O.EDNAD (VIA) KUMBLA KASARGOD TALUK AND DISTRICT. 6. N.BALAKRISHNA, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O.CHANDU CHETTIAR, HINDU, DRIVER, RESIDING AT NAIKAPU, NARAYANAMANGALAM, P.O.EDNAD (VIA) KUMBLA, KASARGOD TALUK. 7. K.VISHWANATHA, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O.PADMANABHA, HINDU, DRIVER, RESIDING AT MARIGUDI TEMPLE, KORAKODE, KASARGOD, P.O.KASARGOD, KASARGOD TALUK AND DISTRICT. A.S.No.476/1995 : 2 : 8. V.MADHUSOODANA, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.K.V.KRISHNAN, HINDU, DRIVER, RESIDING AT VALIYAVEEDU, CERAMICS ROAD, THERUVATH, THALANGARA VILLAGE AND POST, KASARGOD TALUK AND DISTRICT. R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.K.JOHN, R2 BY ADV. GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE, SRI.K.A.LALAN THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------- A.S.No.476 of 1995 ------------------------------- Dated this the 1st February, 2008. J U D G M E N T Counsel appearing for the appellant is no more. Notice was issued to the appellant to appear and prosecute the appeal. But that notice was returned stating that the appellant Society is closed. So, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, JUDGE nj. K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------- A.S.No.476 of 1995 J U D G M E N T Dated:1st February, 2008. -------------------------------