IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.19187 of 2010 MD.MATIUR RAHMAN SON OF LATE JAN MOHAMMAND, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAGHOPUR GADDI, P.S. RAGHOPUR, P.O. RADHANAGAR, DISTRICT- SUPAUL Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE DIRECTOR, PANCHAYATI RAJ CUM JOINT SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR PANCHAYATI RAJ-CUM-JOINT SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, PANCHAYATI RAJ (HQ) DIRECTORATE OF PANCHAYATI RAJ, BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SUPAUL 5. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR, ESTABLISHMENT, SUPAUL COLLECTORATE, ESTABLISHMENT SECTION, DISTRICT- SUPAUL 6. THE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SUPUAL 7. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, RAGHOPUR, DISTRICT- SUPAUL 8. THE SECRETARY, DISTRICT BOARD, SAPAUL 9. THE PANCHAYAT SAMITI, RAGHOPUR, THROUGH PANCHAYAT SECRETARY 10. THE DISTRICT BOARD, SUPAUL THROUGH DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, SUPAUL 11. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, BIRCHAND PATEL MARG, PATNA ----------- 2 24.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Nikesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 8 & 10 and Mr. Arun Kumar Aurn, learned counsel for the respondent no.11. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 31st December, 2008 from the post of Tax Daroga while working under the respondent no.9 the retiral dues as admissible to him has not been paid till date as stated in paragraph 1 of the writ application. However, after some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of the unpaid claims, petitioner proposes to file a detailed representation before the respondent no.2 with copy to - 2 - the respondent nos. 8, 10 & 11. In view of the above, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the representation of the petitioner shall be considered and disposed of by a reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)