HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISiON BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. HON'BLE SHRS RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR,J c AppeiSants -.^- .^'- Misceilaneous Appeal No.611 of 2004 1 Smt Janki Bai, Aged about 21 years, W/o Late Shri Sudarshan Dhruw, Viilage - Hirri Mines, Thana Hirri Tehsil Bilha, Distt Bilaspur (CG) 2 IVlinor Hemant Kumar Dhruw, Aged about 1 year S/o Late Shri Sudarshan Dhruw, Through Legal Guardian & mother Smt Jankj Bal, Village - Hirri - Mines, Thana - Hirri Tehsii Biiha, Distt Bllaspur (CG) 3 Smt Sukalhin Bai, Aged about 50 years W/o Shri Agarsram Dhruw,, Viilage - Hirri -Mines, Thana Hirri, Tehsil - Bilha, Distt Biiaspur (CG) 4 Shri Agasram Dhruw, Aged about 55 years, S/o IfrAfw'ari Ram Dhruw, Vlliage - Hirri - Mines, Dlstt Bilaspur (CG) VERSUS Respondents Kamal Singh, Aaed about 24 years; S/o Sampat Singh, Occupatlon Auto Rickshaw Driver, R/o Bangla Yard RaiSvvay CoSony, Biiaspur Tehsil & District Bilaspur (CG) Bachchan Singh, S/o Sampat Singh, R/o Bangta Yard Raiiway Coiony, Bilaspur Tehsil & District Bilaspur (CG) The Nationa! Insurance Company Llmlted, Through Branch Manager, Branch Offlce Rlng Road, Priyadarshini Nagar, Biiaspur, Tahsii & Distt Bife^pur (CG) ^ Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 173 of Motor VehlcSe Act c Present : None for the appeifants. Shri MK Bhaduri, counse! for respondents No.1 and 2 Shri Pawan Shrivastava, counsel on behaif of Shri UNS Deo, counse! forrespondent No.3. ORDER ...l &th (20tn September, 2010) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. None for the appellants. 2) As there is no representation on behalf of the appeilants, we are ieft with no other option, but to dismiss the appeai for want of prosecution. ~ 3) /~.The appeai, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- ;R.N. Chandrakar ~ Judge X, Sd/- . Chief Justice subbu