IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1835 of 2009 1.SHEO MANGAL SINGH @ SHEO MANGAL SHARMA 2.Manoj Singh @ Manoj Sharma 3.Rakesh Singh @ Rakesh Sharma @ Rakesh Kumar Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----- 3 24.12.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that though the petitioners have been alleged for causing assault and their assault caused injury including a fracture of hand injury but petitioners are neighbours having land dispute. For the occurrence of the same day a case was lodged on their side against the informant’s side which also resulted in conviction for the offence under section 323 of I.P.C. But accused of that case were released after due admonition under section 3 of the Probation of Offenders Act and petitioners are awarded punishment for one month under section 323, six months under section 325 and fifteen days under section 341 of I.P.C. Learned counsel emphasizes on the point of sentence only by referring above submission to the period undergone by them which they faced after their surrender on 23.11.2009. Sentences are to run concurrently so further specification of the period of sentence for each of the offences is not necessary when I am of the opinion that the period undergone is sufficient towards the punishment. In the result, revision petition is partly allowed on the 2 point of sentence. The period of sentence is modified by minimizing to the period already undergone by the petitioners confirming the conviction. The aforesaid petitioners are directed to be released forthwith. Let this order be faxed at the cost of the petitioners. Anilkr.sinha (Mandhata Singh,J.)