1 8IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 13 OF 2009 Deepak S/o. Shivkumar Bahry ...Petitioner Versus Yashin Mohd & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Mishra i/by Mr. A.M. Saraogi for the Petitioner Ms. Indu Prakash for Respondent No. 1 Mrs. S. Joshi for Respondent No. 2. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE: AUGUST 26, 2009 P.C.:- This petition has been filed for reliefs mainly on two grounds, that respondent No. 2 passed an Award, although he was not appointed an Arbitrator by both the parties. Secondly, it is contended that he passed an Award after 13th Mach, 2007, but it was shown to have been passed on 9th March, 2007. 2. The petitioner further contends that a letter was sent to him by the Arbitrator on 9th March, 2009, which annexed an 2 Award, which had stamp paper bearing the date 13th March, 2009. According to the petitioner, if the Award was passed on 9th March, 2009, the non-judicial stamp paper, on which it was scribed, could not have been purchased on 13th March, 2009. We do not want to comment about the correctness or otherwise of these allegations, but at best, these can be grounds for challenging the Award in an appeal. We understand that the Award has already been challenged in an appeal. We do not find, in any way, that these facts disclose that the respondents have committed contempt of this Court. 3. For these reasons, the Contempt Petition is dismissed. We make it clear that we have not gone into the merits of the controversies between the parties as regards the passing of the Award or its legality. BILAL NAZKI, J. A.R. JOSHI, J.