IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 20TH DECEMBER 2011 / 29TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 Crl.MC. No. 328 of 2011() --------------------------------- (L.P.44/01 IN C.C.110/97 ON THE FILE OF THE JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, MAVELIKKARA) .......................................... PETITIONER : -------------------- SASIKUMAR, S/O.GOPALAN, THARAYIL PUTHEN VEEDU, WARD NO.10, PALLICKAL PANCHAYATH, KUNNATHUKARA MURI, PERINGANADU VILLAGE, ADOOR. BY ADV. SRI.S.HARIKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS : ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. RETHI KUMARI, THEKKEMEKKADU VEEDU, MANKAMKUZHI.P.O, VETTIYAR MURI, VETTIYAR VILLAGE, MAVELIKKARA TALUK. R1 BY SMT.JASMINE, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR R2 BY ADVS. SRI.M.V.THAMBAN SRI.R.REJI SMT.THARA THAMBAN THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: RKM -2- Crl. MC. No. 328 of 2011() APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A1 : COPY OF THE PRIVATE COMPLAINT, C.M.P6999/96 ON THE FILE OF THE HON'BLE JFCM, MAVELIKKARA. ANNEXURE A2 : COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.189/96 OF KURATHIKAD POLICE STATION. ANNEXURE A3 : COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 04.07.1997 ENTERED BY THE DE FACTO COMPLAINANT, WITH PETITIONER'S BROTHER. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE RKM N.K. BALAKRISHNAN,J. ------------------------------------ Crl.M.C.No. 328 of 2011 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 20th day of December, 2011 ORDER Petitioner was the accused in CC.110/97 which is now pending as L.P. No.44/01 of JFCM, Mavelikkara. The offence alleged against him is under Section 498A IPC. The second respondent is the de facto complainant therein. She is represented in this court by her counsel. It is submitted by both sides that the entire matter has been settled out of court. Affidavit of the de facto complaint has been filed stating that the matter has been settled and she has no further grievance on the matter. In the light of the settlement arrived at, this petition is allowed. Further proceedings in CC. 110/97 is quashed. N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. smvd