CWP No.675 of 1990 1 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.675 of 1990 Date of Decision: 29.04.2010 Bir Bhan, Tracer, Office of the Executive Engineer, Jagadhri. ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another .....Respondents 1.Whether Reporter of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment- Yes/No. 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not- Yes/No. 3.Whether judgment should be reported in the digest-Yes/No. Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh Present: Mr. Sunil Panwar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Paramjeet Singh Bitta, Addl. AG, Haryana. Mr. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) 1. By the present petition, petitioner is assailing order dated 02.01.1990 reverting the petitioner from the post of Tracer to the post of Ferro Khalasi Annexure P6. Order dated 28.09.1979 reveals that petitioner was provisionally/on ad hoc basis, promoted to the post of Tracer. On being confronted, learned counsel for the petitioner admits that there was no regular promotion to the petitioner and promotion vide Annexure P6 was only on ad hoc basis/provisionally. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner has acquired further qualification for promotion for the post of Ferro Khalasi. He further states that petitioner shall move representation, claiming relaxation, for promotion. CWP No.675 of 1990 2 3. Learned counsel for the respondents states that if petitioner moves representation that shall be decided by speaking order in accordance with law. 4. In view of statement made by learned counsel for the respondents, learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to move a representation seeking promotion for the post of Ferro Khalasi. 5. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to move representation, if so advised. In the event of moving the representation respondents shall decide the same within two months thereafter, by speaking order in accordance with law. (ALOK SINGH) JUDGE 29.04.2010 sharmila