IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22060 of 2011 Md. Zafar, Son of Late Md. Amanatullah, Resident of Village Sohatta, P.S. Chhatapur, District Supaul. ---------- Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar. 2.Md. Moinuddin, Son of Sk. Mohammad, Resident of Village Sohatta, P.S. Chhatapur, District Supaul. -------- Opposite Parties With Cr.Misc. No.23133 of 2011 Md. Anwarul @ Md. Anwarul Haque, Son of Late Md. Kari, Resident of Village Parsa, P.S. Supaul, District Supaul, At present posted as Assistant Clerk in Block Office, Chhattapur, P.S. Chattapur, District Supaul. ---------- Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar. -------- Opposite Party ----------- 02/- 01/08/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Both these applications arising out of one case are taken up together and being disposed of by this composite order. The petitioners are named accused in this case respectively being Ward Member and Assistant Clerk in Block Office, Chhatapur, carry allegation of providing the benefit of Indira Awas Scheme allotted to wife of the complainant-informant to another lady, who however has already refunded the money and the complainant- informant as said has already filed an application under the joint signature of petitioner also to dispose of the case in view of the compromise. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, on the event of the informant appearing as a witness in support of factum 2 of compromise with his free will and consent without any coercion and also stood as one of the bailors, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, in connection with Chhatapur P.S. Case No. 3 of 2011, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years of till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)