Q?:SS.g^R f S^VF-^t.^'- SiiMVLE SBaCs — EJii.B'gtyy <°^F (OQ ^— IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION [S] N0.57^& /2006 [S.B1 PETIT10NER RESPQNDENTS ^\ ^€/ '.->"; L .•"' \o..-' $%0 Ki^-v" /^^' ^y./-' ^.^- Ashwani Kumar Sharma son of Ganesh Prasad Sharma, aged about 43 years, lecturer Government Basic Training Institute Bilaspur [C.G.] VERSUS 1] The State of Chhattisgarh, Through- The Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur [C.G.]. 2] Director of School Education/ D.P.1. Raipur [C.G.]. 3] District Education Officer, Bilaspur 4] The Principal, Basic Training Institute, Bilaspur [C.G.]. <<<;WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION @P INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITFS1 ORDERrS], DIRECTIONtS] TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER Ih', HIi5H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (5) No. 5156 of 2006 Petitioner ; Adiwoni Kumar Siarma Versus Reqiondents The State of Chhatt'isgarh & others Single Bench; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. Mr. AA.K. Bhaduri, AdvocaTe for the Petitioner. Ms. Deepali Pandey, Panel Ldnwyer for the State/respondents. '-^T ORDER (Passed on this 23'i &ay of February. 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is working as Lecturer in the Schooi Education Oepartnnent. The petitioner obtained B. Ed. Examination certificate in the year 1990, on his own expenses. 2. Learned counsei appearing for -the petitioner submits that the question involved, herein asto whether the teacher, who obtained B. Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses is entitled to two advance increments. 3. According to ieamed counse! for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to two advance increments in view of the decision of this Court in the case of yaslwvant l&anar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporotion. Ehjrg ond another {2006 CEI) MPJR-C6 96}. This Court in the case of y<ashwcnt Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. AAunicipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), came to the conciusion that fne teachers, who had obtained B. Ed. /B.T.I. Examina'l'ion Certificate on their own expenses, are covered by the circufar dated 24.12.98 issued by the State Sovemment of Madhya Pradesh. 4. Leamed counsel for the petitioner further ^ubmits that the facts ond question of law involved in 1+ie present ca^ are squareiy coyered by decision of 1+iis Court in the case of yashwant Kunar Bharudwaj Vs. Municipai Corporution, Qwy and another (Supra), to which learned counsel appearing for the reqaondents fairty concedss and agrees with the averment made by leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner. Accordingly, tiie writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passsd in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Owy ond another (Supro), subject to verification of •tiie fact as to whe1+ier the petitioner has acquired B. Ed. Examination Certificale on his.own expensesas per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 & 1.3.1999 and further whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge yoge^i