^.A^fiSte,. J .f •^ COURT OF CHHATESGARH_:_BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 2930 of2009 Rupendra Kuiuar Sahu, S/o Vishnu Ram Sahu, aged about 33 years,R/o vQla^e Sim, P.0. Joratarai, T'alisil Kurud, District Dhamtari(C.G.) Versus .ents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretan', Department of Panchayat & Samaj Sewa, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur(C.G.) 2. !- Director, Paachayat & Samaj Sewa, Dit'ectorate, Chliattisgarh, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Circle, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Dhaiutaii (C.G.) (Wiit Petition Under Article 226 ofthe Constitution oflndia) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.j Shri Ajay Thakrc, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for fh.e respondents No. 1 9. Thakur (Passed on this 22nd day ofJune, 2009) By ttiis petition the petitioner prays for the relief "That, this Hon'ble Court niay krudly be pleased to direct the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner within a stipulated period." The petitioner has not sought for cousideradon or appointiuent on fh.e post of SIuksha Kanni Grade-I (Econoinics). However, the prayer confiaes only to ttie consideration of the representation, which is aanexed as Aiuiexure P/5. Without expressing any opiuion on the nierits of fhe case, it is directed fhat if the representation is peii.ding, the respondeiit No. 3 uiay consider and decide the same, iu accordance with law, on. its oxvn inerits. If the respondents are aggrieved by this order, fb.cy niay seek for inodi&cation, if so adnsed. In view of the foregoiag, this petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. ' i' -- -—- --- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge