Criminal Misc. No. M-3595 of 2009 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Criminal Misc. No. M-3595 of 2009 Date of Decision: 25.2.2009 Rajinder Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and Others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. A.P.S. Shergill, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) In the present case FIR (Annexure P6) has been lodged by the aggrieved wife. She has stated that she was married with petitioner on 10.6.2005. it is stated that she was residing alone at Jalandhar and her husband who was settled in America used to visit on and off. According to the complainant, in the FIR she has stated that she learnt that petitioner who is residing abroad is a Non Resident Indian and had married three ladies and had duped them. Specific instance has been stated that petitioner had married Paramjit on 3.6.1990, thereafter he had married Parminder Raj on 6.10.2000, and thereafter he had married Balwinder Kaur on 16.1.2008. The complainant was fourth victim of the petitioner who flush with dollars has ruined the life of many women. Specific allegations have been levelled against the petitioner. While issuing notice of motion on 6.2.2009, this Court had Criminal Misc. No. M-3595 of 2009 2 noticed the contention of counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready to comply with the compromise arrived between the petitioner- husband and the estranged wife. It was further stated that petitioner was ready to pay Rs.25,000/- for expenses for appearance of the estranged wife in this Court and engagement of counsel by her. Only on this count, notice of motion was issued. The amount was not deposited and another date was sought on 13.2.2009. Then also the amount has not been deposited. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR lodged at the instance of aggrieved wife cannot be quashed in view of the allegations made in the FIR that the complainant is the fourth victim of petitioner. Allegations levelled by the complainant in FIR have been disputed. Disputed facts cannot be entertained in petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR. At this stage, counsel for the petitioner states that he be permitted to withdraw the present petition to raise all arguments before the trial Court at appropriate stage. As prayed, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge February 25, 2009 “DK”