HEGH $©§JRT OF JUHECATURE AT E§LASE3URI SHRkTTEE§A§€R $ingae Sench : Hon’me Shri HA“. Eatm, gd. g Camempt Gage Na. 2§ GF 2w? ”: S'mi Amriie Das: counsei {er the peiii‘ioner. Shri GK. Beriwai, counsel far me responder}: QRAL OR§ER {Passed’ mm? on 23‘ March, 299?) This Court while disposmg of the Writ Petition No2$01 of 2004 rmted the petitioner to make an appropnate representation before the peit respondent and a direction was issued to the tespono‘erit to constder that rresentation in accordance with iaw. ep (2) Learned counsel appearing for the respondent wouio submit v‘ no Hetitiorrer. This assertion of t‘ne teamed counsei for the respondent requires to be accepted for the reason that he has produced a oopy of the order passed by the respondent before this Court. that the respondent has considered the representation (3} in View of theabove, in my opinion, there ie substantiai i compiiance of orders and directions issued by this Court. Acoordingiy, no further proceedings need to be continued However, iibertv is reserved to the Pmserii F‘aE‘Et'asner Jagdish Prasad Chakradhari 810. Shri Pandu Prasad Chakradharé, Aged auout 53 years, Ric. ViHage Kansabe!, Tehsii Bagicha, Dist Jashpur, ChhattiSgarh. M . , Vs, §§§Q§n§gn§ Shri CK. Khaitan Seamemmr Secretary, Deparement -f Edwaem DKVS. Bhawan} MantfaEaya, Raipun Chhattisgam, \ ' /p petitioner, if he aggrieved by the order passed by the respcndent, to approach an appropriate forum for appropriate relief. Ordered accorrjingiy. Sdl-~” ’ chief Justice ‘k