CWP(T) No. 7923/2008 05.03.2011 Present: Mr. Surender Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R. M. Bisht, Dy. A.G with Mr. Vinod Thakur, Dy. A.G. for the respondents Petitioner has prayed for the following relief:- “i) That the impugned Annexure A-6, dated 6.8.2001 may be quashed and set aside; ii) That the respondents may be directed to implement Annexure A-4, dated 18.6.2001 with a further direction to issue muster roll of Supervisor to the applicant and to pay him accordingly; iii) That the respondents may be directed to appoint the applicant as regular Supervisor w.e.f. his initial date of appointment in the respondent Department i.e. 23.12.1994 with all consequential benefits like seniority and arrears of salary alongwith interest @18% per annum; iv) That the seniority of the applicant may be counted w.e.f. 23.12.94 when he was engaged in the respondent Department after appointing him as Supervisor from due date.” 2. Even though order dated 18.6.2001 (Annexure A-4) does not assign any reason and the same was passed without affording any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, but however looking into the reply filed by the State, it is quite apparent that no case for interference under Article 226 is made out by the petitioner. Petitioner was given appointment on compassionate basis as a Beldar. On his subsequent representation, respondents changed his designation to that of a Supervisor and issued muster roll accordingly. This order however, was never acted upon and subsequently withdrawn in terms of letter dated 6.8.2001 (Annexure A-6). 3. From the unrebutted reply filed by the State, it stands explained that order changing the petitioner’s designation to that of a Supervisor was wrongly issued as there was neither any work nor any post available as on that date. Consequently, present petition does not merit interference and the same is accordingly dismissed. March 05, 2011 ( Sanjay Karol ), (rana) Judge.