IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.2844 of 2000 Date of Decision. 28.09.2010 National Insurance Company Limited, Regional Office, through its Assistant Manager, SCO No.332-334, Sector 34-A, Chandigarh ......Appellant Versus Baljit Singh son of Sardara Singh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. V.Ramswaroop, Advocate for the appellant. None for the respondents. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The insurance company is on appeal challenging the liability on the ground that for a third party claim for damage to property, the liability was restricted under the terms of the policy at Rs.6,000/- only, in the manner provided under Section 147(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act. The Tribunal has assessed the compensation for damage to a property at Rs.20,000/- and has directed the entire amount to be paid by the insurance company. The liability shall stand restricted in the manner provided by law and affirmed through contract at Rs.6,000/- with interest and the amount in excess of the same shall be recovered from the owner insured. 2. The appeal is allowed to the above extent. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE September 28, 2010 Pankaj*