HIGHCQURTOF CHHATTISGARH ATBIIASFUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION (S) No. 3016 of2008 : Devi Din Singh S/o Motilal Smgii, aged about35 yeas, R^- Village- K<miyalcala, TaBsil? - Tayonfiiai,DistrictReiwa(M.P.)'" ' "VERSUS: ,,;.,.'•<'• -: : 1. Chamnan, Coal Lidia Etd. 10.Ne1ajiSubl»shRoad, Kolkata(W.B.) ;• 2.T)irectw (P. & IR) Coal India Ltd., 10 Netaji SubhashRoad,K6lkata(WA) 3. MemberSe<a-etaTy,IBCC-yi(JomtB!ipartitefur1fae Coal Industty), Coal India Ltd. 10, Netaji Subhash Roa<iKolkata(W.B.) 4. Chauman-cum-Maaagu^ Direetoi, S.E.C.L. Head , Quarta, Seepat Ejoad, Bilagnir (C.6.) ? 5. Cluef Gaieral Maaag^ S.E.C<I» Area Bhat^M^ DistrictSurgiga^.O.) - WRm'ETITIONUNDER ARTIGI^326/2270F 1HE CQNSTmjHONWINraA SB: Hon'Me Shrt SatisteK. AenUntol. J; Present: ShriF.S.Khare, Advocate ^Aepetitumw. ^ T Shri Vwek Shrivastava, Advocate appearingonbehdfofShri Praveen Das, Advocate fbrthe respondeHtNo. 4 and 5.?^- ORALOfiDER (Passed on 19" day of Jvae, 2008) i 1. With the conserrt ofthe parties;the mattCT is taken up for hearing finatly. i2. Leamed coimsel appearing ft»r the petitiouer jsubmits that ths petitipner is similarly situated to that ofthe respondefflts in ffie matter ofCKairman, Cenfral CoalftelSs Ltd. & Others Vs. Jivendra Prasad Tiwari & Others (Civil Appeal No. 1714 of 2007). Leamed counsel furfflersubmits thatthe said Civil Appeal ha&been disposedofvide oTderdated29*March,20Q7,passedbyflieHoa'ble Supreme Court of India. Leamed eounsel furfher subimits fhat this case may also be disposed ofin Ifae same temis. There is no ojmosition by learaed counsel for fherespondents. 3. In view offhe above, fhe petition stands disposed of in the same terms. No orderastQ costs. SarishK.Agnihom Judge litoct