: 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4141 OF 1992 Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation ... Petitioner V/s. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. ltd. ... Respondent a/w WRIT PETITION NO.4146 OF 1992 Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation ... Petitioner V/s. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. ltd. ... Respondent a/w WRIT PETITION NO.4150 OF 1992 Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation ... Petitioner V/s. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. ltd. ... Respondent a/w WRIT PETITION NO.4151 OF 1992 Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation ... Petitioner V/s. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. ltd. ... Respondent a/w WRIT PETITION NO.4153 OF 1992 Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation ... Petitioner V/s. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. ltd. ... Respondent : 2 : WRIT PETITION NO.4155 OF 1992 Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation ... Petitioner V/s. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. ltd. ... Respondent Mr.P.K. Dhakephalkar i/b S.R. Ganbavale for Petitioner Mr.Milind Sathe a/w S.M. Gorwadkar and Mr.H.N. Vakil for Respondent CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 11th AUGUST, 2009 JUDGMENT: 1. These writ petitions are in respect of the ratable value for the residential flats which have been erected at the premises by the Company for their employees. The appeals filed by the Company have been dismissed. The Municipal Corporation’s assessment of the annual letting value @8% of the construction cost has been accepted by the Court. Similarly, the ratable value which is calculated after deducting 10% of the annual letting value has also been accepted by the Court. 2. Surprisingly, however, the writ petitions have been filed although the municipal Corporation has succeeded in these appeals. These writ petitions are therefore dismissed.