IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 14 of 2006 Amar Bahadur Saroj …Petitioner. Versus State of U.P. and others. …Respondents. Mr. Tumul Nailwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Beena Pande, Advocate for the respondents. Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. Khehar, C.J, (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states, that the petitioner’s gratuity had been withheld, but the same has now been released rendering the instant Writ Petition infructuous. 2. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant Writ Petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 7.6.2010 Rathour