IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2384 of 2005 DHRUP YADAV & ORS Versus MADHURI SHARAN VERMA & ORS ----------- 9 29.09.2008 No one appears for the petitioners. Counsel for the plaintiff opposite party No.1 is present. This Court would not find any jurisdictional error in the impugned order inasmuch as it was rightly held by the Court below that the matter of payment of Court fee is basically between the plaintiff and the Court. That being so, the prayer of the defendant-petitioner for rejecting the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 was wholly misconceived in as much as the suit was out and out a suit for injunction and was properly valued by the plaintiff as has been recorded by the court below in the impugned order. That being so, this Court would find no reason to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly, this Civil Revision application is dismissed. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)