IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9504 of 2009 1. ARUN MISTRY @ ARUN SHARMA 2. DEGAN RANA ---------------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 8 3.8.2010 By order dated 15.4.2009 petitioner no.2 who is father-in-law of the complainant, has been allowed anticipatory bail by this Court. Learned counsel is pressing this application for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner no.1, who is husband of the complainant. Heard the parties. Alleged torture for demand of dowry needs no further corroboration as in this Court, on request of petitioner no.1 his wife was noticed, both were directed to remain physically present in Court but it is the third date when petitioner is absent. Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner no.1 is rejected. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)