HIGH COURT OF CHHA’ITISGARH AT BILASPUR M,A. N0. 701 of 2005 Parmanand Sahu, aged about 48 years, S/ o Kriparam Sahu, Occupation — Post Master, R/ o Villag€ Bodsar, Thana —- Janjgir Champa, District Janjgir Cham‘pa (C.G.). Appellant Versus REspondents 1. Ramkrislma Rathore, S/ o Jogxendra Lal, aged about 38 years, R/o Khokhia, Thana 8r. Tahsil — Janjgir, District- Janjgir Champa (C.G.). 2. Bhagvat Prasad S] o Kartjram Rathore, aged about 37 yeaIS, R] o Khokhra, Tahsil and District- Janjgir I Champa (C.G.). V .‘ DB: Hon’hlo 8111i Justice S. R. Nayak, C.J‘ § ’ (”m Hon’ble Shn' Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Mr. Vimalosh Bajpai, Advocate for the appellant. ORAL ORDER ( 5*1‘ December 2005) The following order of the Court was passed‘by S. R. Nayak, C,J. This appeal is preferred by the. injured seeking more compensation. It was contended by learned counsel for the appellant that since the appellant has sustained 20% of the permanent disability on knee the Tribunal ought to have awarded compensation under the said head reasonable compensation towards ‘future loss of income’ and for ‘loss of amenities of life’. The fact remains that the appellant has not examinaed the doctor who treated him. In other words there is absolutely .no evidence to support the claim of the appellant that he sustained 200A) permanent disability on the knee. We have perused the record. The Tribunal has awarded permissible compensation under all relevant heads, such as, pain and suffering, medical expenses, traveling expenses etc. No ground is made out for our interference. The appeal is therefore dismissad. ‘ Sdl— Chief Justice' RN Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge