IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 26269 of 2001 BETWEEN: B. Radha, W/o. B. Rama Raju, R/o. 1-10-72/A, Begumpet, Hyderabad-16. ... PETITIONER AND The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent is not receiving the building plan application for sanction of building plans and releasing the building sanction plan in respect of the Petitioner's house properties bearing M.C.H. No.8-2-293/82/A/1326 in an area of 637 Sq. yards equivalent to 533 Sq. Mtrs., situated at Jubilee Hills in Sy.no.120 (old 403-1) of Shaikpet Village and Sy.No.102/1, of Hakimpet Village, Hyderabad and house property bearing H.No.8-2-293/82/A/1326/1, in an area of 728 Sq. yards equivalent to 602 Sq. mtrs, situated at Jubilee Hills in Sy.No.120 (Old 403-1) of Shaikpet Village and Sy.No.102/1, of Hakimpet Village, Hyderabad is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300 A of Constitution of India and consequently directions to the respondent, i.e, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad to receive, sanction and release the building sanction plan in respect of the petitioner's dwelling units bearing M.C.H.No.8-2-293/82/A/1326 in an area of 637 Sq. yards equivalent to 533 Sq. mtrs situated at Jubilee Hills in Sy.No.120 (old 403-1) of Shaikpet Village and Sy.no.102/1, of Hakimpet Village, Hyderabad and house property bearing H.No.8-2-293/82/A/1326/1, in an area of 728 Sq. yards equivalent to 602 Sq. mtrs, situated at Jubilee Hills in Sy.No.120 (Old 403-1) of Shaikpet Village and Sy.No.102/1, of Hakimpet Village, Hyderabad without insisting the NO OBJECTION CERTIFICATE from the respondent No.1 ie., Special Officer & Competent Authority Urban Land Ceilings, Hyderabad and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.C.HANUMANTHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: SMT.KALPANA EKBOTE The Court made the following: ORDER: Mr. Vijaya Bhaskar, learned counsel representing Mr. C. Hanumantha Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous and there survives no cause for adjudication. Recording the above submission, the writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J July 18, 2008 DSK