1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.272 OF 2004 (Margaret Dagalas Clancy vs. Molly Clancy and others) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr.L.V.Sangit, Adv., h/f Mr. V.J.Dixit, learned Senior Advocate, for petitioner. Mr.M.N.Navandar, Adv., for respondent nos. 1(A) to 1(H). ... CORAM: R.K.DESHPANDE, J. DATE:11/8/2010 ... 1. Heard Shri Sangit, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri M.N.Nawandar, learned Counsel for respondent no.1 (A) to 1(H). Both the learned Counsels have filed on record the consent terms dt.11.8.2010, marked as "X" for identification. 2. Shri Sangit, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is present in the Court in person whereas, Shri M.N.Navandar, learned Counsel submits that respondent No.1(C) is personally present in the Court 2 and she is holding power of attorney for and on behalf of respondent nos. 1(A) to 1(H). At the request of learned Counsel for the petitioner, respondent no.2 is permitted to be deleted. 3. The consent terms are taken on record. The petition along with the Civil Application stands disposed of in view of the consent terms. No order as to costs. (R.K.DESHPANDE) JUDGE agp/272-04wp