acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.38 OF 2009 Dayanand Vishnu Samant & Ors. ..Applicants. Vs. Shree Shrestha Sevashram (Ratnagiri) ... Respondents. ..... Shri R.D. Suryavanshi, for the Applicants.] Mr. Vaibhav Ratnakar, for Respondent Nos.3,4 and 6 to 8. ..... CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATE : 26 th APRIL, 2010. P.C. 1. The Order under challenge is interlocutory. There is no reason to interfere with the same at this stage. If the final orders in the suit are adverse to the Petitioners, then, while challenging them they can raise appropriate pleas with regard to the jurisdiction of the Trial Court and also on applicability of Section 50 of Bombay Public Trust, 1950. 2. Keeping open the contentions of both sides, this Civil Revision Application is dismissed. (S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)