IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22126 of 2011 Reena Kumari, D/O- Ram Bachan Lal Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03 26.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Petitioner being unmarried Nanad of the deceased is languishing in jail custody since 23.04.2011 in a case registered under Sections 304 (B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The only material which has come against the petitioner is that in course of treatment deceased gave her statement before one S.I., namely, Babban Baitha and in the aforesaid statement she stated that she was set ablaze by her husband as well as this petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner challenged the above stated so-called dying declaration of the deceased on the ground that the aforesaid statement does not contain either the signature of the deceased or signature of any doctor and moreover, the statement of above stated Babban Baitha has not been recorded by the Investigating Officer in course of investigation. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Mithanpura P.S. Case No. 122 of 2011. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)