0‘20 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P. (227) no. 7079/2011 Petitioner Smt, Firanteen (K11. Firanteen) Claimant Nov 3 D/d Late Ghasiyaram Kewat, Aged about 18 yeats, R/o Village Pisid, P.S. Kasdol, Distt. Raipur (C.G.), Versus Respondents 1. Pitambar Patel S/o Ramlal Patel, Non-Applicant Aged about 40 y€ars, R/o Village Pisid, P.S. Tahsil, Kasdol, Distt. Raipur(C.G,). Driver and Owner of Truck bearing registration No. CG-O4- DB-7792 2. Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd., (Anjl Dhirubhai Ambani Group), Shop No. 412-413, 4‘11 Floor, Ravi Bhawan, Jaisthumb Chowk, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.). Insurer of Truck bean’ng Iegistration No. CG-04-DB-7792. Claimants 3. Gurbari Bai Wd/o Late Ghasiyaxam Kewat, Aged about 42 years, 4. Fixtu Ram S/o Late Ghasiyaram Kewat, Aged about 22 years 5. Ku. Sum'ta (Minor) D/o Late Ghasiyaram Kewat, Aged about 14 years 6. Ku. Anita (Minor) D/o Late Ghasiyaram, Kewat, Aged about 2 yems 7. Ku. Sangeeta (Minor) D/o Late Ghasiylam Kewat, Aged about 7 years Respondent No. 5 to 7 are minors through natural guardian mother smt. Gurban' Bai W/o Late Ghasiyaram Kewat, Aged about 42 years. All R/o Village Pisid, RS. Kasdol, Distt. Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (83 :I-Ion’ble Mr. T.P.sharma, J.) Present:— Shri Suresh Kumar Vanna, Advocate for the petitioner. Respondents not noticed. ORDER (Passed on 28/ 1 1 1201 1) 1. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India petitioner has challenged the legality and propriety of the order datcd 3/ 10/ 2011 passed by 1“ Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Baloda Bazar, District Raipur (C.G.) in Claim Case No. 11/09 whcmby application for withdrawal of Rs. 30,000] — tiled on behalf of the petitioner on account of her treatlnent has been dismissed. Shri Smesh Kumar Velma, Advocate for the petitioner is heard. Order impugned perused. Being a unman‘ied daughter Rs. 40,000/- has been awarded to the petitioner thereafter her marriage was solemnjzed and presently she is pregnant out of Rs. 40,000/- Rs. 10,000/— has been given to her on 24/9/2011 and after 9 days petin‘oner has med another application for withdrawal of remaining Rs. 30,000/a. After her marriage, she looses character of dependency n‘om her parents. Rs. 30,000/— has been deposited in FDRs for 3 years for her benehts, I do not find any illegality in dismissing the application tiled on behalf of the petin‘oner. Consequently, petition is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. Wt Sdl— T.P. Sharma Judge