HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W’rit Petition (S) No. 2886 of 2008 PETITIONERS 1. Chamar Singh Sidar, S/o Shri Hanu Sidar, aged about 49 years. Upper Division Teacher, Govemmcnt Middle School, Padakidipa, Block Baramkcla. District Raigarh (CG). 2. Trinath Prasad Patel, S/o Shri Ghasiram Patel, aged about 53 years. Upper Division Teacher, Aashram Shala, Kenabhatha, Bloc-l: \Baramkela, District Raigarh (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS : ha . State of Chhattisgarh, throngh Sec-retaiy, Education Department. DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. District Education Officer, Raigarh (CG). 3. The Assistant Commissioner. Tribai 8L Welfare Department, Raigarh (CG). 4. Block Education Officer. Baramkela, District Raigarh (CG). (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'hle Mr. SatiSh K. Agnihotri, J.) Present : Shri Anil Mourya, Advocate for the petitioneis. Shri Amrito Das, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 18m day of June, 2608) With the eonsem of the parties, the matter is taken up for healing finally. 1. The petitioners were appointed as Assistant Teachers on fixed pay of Rs. 150/’-. After completion oftwo years of probation period, they were granted regular pay scale. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in the ease is asto whether, ' the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date initial appointment or after completion of probation period. i 2. The issue involved, herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in 0A. N0. 2745/89 (Madhulgant 1 Yadu and 56 others Vs. State 0f MP. & others), Wheyein ii was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale wef. the date of initial appointment. The matter Was taken up to Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93 The said petition was dismissed by the Honfble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from date of initial appointment. In View of the above stated submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in the same terms i.e. the petitioners are granted liberty to make a representation, if so advised, to consider their case, ifthey stand on the Same footings as per order dated 24.08.1992 by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur, in OA No. 2745 of 89 Madhukant Yadu mlpra) and subsequently confirmed by order dated 03.01.1994 passed by‘the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93 and grant relief accordingly. ‘ ‘ In View of the foragoing, this petition is disposed o£ No order asto costs. Satish K. Agnihotri l ‘Judge gg; a Sd/— Salm w. 9‘ ., .