IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 412 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION : 01.09.2009 Ram Raj and others .... PETITIONERS Versus Stae of Haryana and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. B.K. Bagri, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Kirti Singh, AAG, Haryana, for respondents No.1 to 4. Mr. Raman B. Garg, Advocate, for respondent No.5. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral ) The petitioners, who are 14 in number, have filed this petition for issuing direction to the respondents to grant Ist and 2nd ACP pay scales to them, in terms of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner & Secretary to Govt. Haryana Versus Ram Sarup Gainda and others, (Civil Appeal No. 3250 of 2006, decided on August 2, 2006), copy of which has been annexed with the petition as Annexure P-3. Counsel for the respondents, on instructions, state that all the petitioners, except petitioner No.6, have been granted the said benefit. CWP No. 412 of 2008 -2- Regarding petitioner No.6, it is stated that he was not found eligible, as no person junior to him has been granted the said benefit. In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. However, it will be open for petitioner No.6 to make representation, if any person junior to him has been granted the said benefit. In case, the petitioners are having grouse with regard to the fixation of pay scale, after granting the said benefits, it will be open for them to make representation before the appropriate authority. September 01, 2009 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE