HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO. 803 OF 2011 Between: Sri Ramana Maharshi Vidyalaya Sangham and one another ………….Appellants AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh represented by its Principal Secretary and six others ………….Respondents JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) This Writ Appeal is directed against the judgment rendered by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No. 3415 of 2011. Petitioners are the appellants. W.P.No. 3415 of 2011 was considered by the learned Single Judge with two other Writ Petitions viz., W.P.Nos. 29847 of 2010 and 23307 of 2011. All the three writ petitions are concerning about the approval of the correspondenceship for two schools, one Primary School and another High School of Proddatur, Kadapa District. The appellants herein are claiming the same right as was claimed by the writ petitioners in W.P.No. 29847 of 2010. A Revision Petition is preferred before the Government by the writ petitioners in W.P.No. 29847 of 2010 since the said revision petition has not yet been decided that the disputes have cropped up with regard to the arrangements to be made in the interregnum period. Therefore, the learned Single Judge directed that the arrangement of payment of salaries directly to the teachers may be continued till the State Government decides the revision petition preferred by the petitioners in W.P.No. 29847/2010. The learned Judge further proceeded to direct the Government of Andhra Pradesh to decide the said revision within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of that order. Learned Judge has also taken care to mention that no policy decision shall be taken by either group till the disposal of the revision. Heard Sri D. Ramakrishna, learned counsel appearing for the appellants and the learned Government Pleader for School Education. Learned counsel for the appellant would contend that when once the District Educational Officer has recognised the appellants as having the right to be the correspondent of the Schools, the learned Judge ought to have allowed the appellants herein to function as the correspondent of the schools till the Government decides the revision one way or the other. We do not consider that the arrangement made by the learned Single Judge should be upset, in the interest of the institutions concerned. Only when the Government decides the revision, a firm opinion can be taken as to which of the said Officers should be allowed to carryon the functions of correspondenceship of the schools. Till such time the issue is decided, teachers and other employees working in the school shall not be put to any inconvenience or hardship. To avoid the same, the learned Single Judge has devised the interim arrangement. We do not find anything improper in the arrangement worked out by the learned Single Judge pending disposal of the revision by the State Government. Hence, we dismiss the Writ Appeal at the admission stage itself. No costs. ________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J ________________________________ NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J DATE: 30.11.2011 KA ... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. 2 CD copies.