Civil Revision No.8205 of 2010 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.8205 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:25.11.2011 Smt. Pushpa Malhotra ....Petitioner Versus Sh. Bal Krishan Suri ....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Vijay Lath, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harit Sharma, Advocate for the respondent. * * * RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL) This is landlord's revision petition challenging the order dated 09.11.2010 of Rent Controller, Jalandhar, vide which an application filed by the respondent-tenant for rejecting the affidavit of landlord tendered in rebuttal evidence, has been allowed. Counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the instant revision petition with liberty to seek appropriate remedy in terms of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Harjit Singh Uppal versus Anup Bansal JT 2011 (6) SC 236. Keeping in view the fact that the petitioner was pursuing his remedy against the impugned order before this Court bonafidely. The question of limitation would not be raised against him, in case, Civil Revision No.8205 of 2010 (O&M) 2 he choses to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority against the impugned order within two weeks from today. With the aforesaid liberty, this petition is ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn. November 25, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) savita JUDGE