THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3291 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner complains that respondent Nos.1 and 2 are calling her to their respective Police Stations, though no case was registered against her. It is stated that the petitioner is a widow and that she is residing with her first son at Tadepali, Guntur. Petitioner’s first son died in an accident on 27.06.2008 and that there is a dispute between herself and the daughter-in-law as regards sharing of the death benefits. Respondent No.1 is said to have visited the house of the petitioner on 17.09.2009 on the basis of a complaint submitted by the daughter-in-law of the petitioner. It is alleged that respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are harassing and torturing the petitioner though no cases have been registered whatever. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Home. It appears that there is a dispute between the petitioner on the one hand and the daughter-in-law on the other as regards sharing of the benefits payable on account of the death of the son of the petitioner. Normally, those disputes have to be resolved by the Courts concerned or the Tribunals. In case any complaint is submitted against the petitioner alleging criminal acts, a case has to be registered and it has to be tried by the Criminal Court concerned. There cannot be any justification for the respondents in repeatedly calling the petitioner to the respective Police Stations for months together, that too, without registering a case. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondents not to call the petitioner and her family members to their respective Police Stations, unless it is warranted on the basis of a crime registered against her and in the course of investigation thereof. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Dt:16.02.2010 Note: Issue cc in three days. (B/o) kdl