IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 14TH OCTOBER 2011 / 22ND ASWINA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 3485 of 2011() ------------------------------------- CC.NO.75/2010 of JUDL. MAGISTRTE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-III, THRISSUR .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER/ACCUSED ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. SHIJU,S/O.YESUDAS,MALIAKEL HOUSE, ANCHERY SOUTH,OLLUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR. 2. YESUDAS,MALIAKEL HOUSE, ANCHERY SOUTH,OLLUR VILLAGE,THRISSUR. 3. RUBY,W/O.YESUDAS,MALIAKEL HOUSE, ANCHERY SOUTH,OLLUR VILLAGE,THRISSUR. 4. SHIJY,D/O.YESUDAS,MALIAKEL HOUSE, ANCHERY SOUTH,OLLUR VILLAGE,THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.V.BINOY RAM RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT -------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KEARLA,REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM.PIN-682 031 2. GEETHU,D/O.PAUL,NJERINJAMPULLY HOUSE, CHEERAKUNDU,MAROTTICHAL DESOM,MANNAMANGALAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK , DISTRICT.PIN-680 014 R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.RAJESH VIJAYAN R2 BY ADV.SMT.SAJITHA P.SOMAN THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts CRMC.NO.3485/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEX 1 COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.7/2010 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-III, THRISSUR. ANNEX 2 COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET IN CRIME NO.7/2010 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-III, THRISSUR. ANNEX 3 COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 10/02/2011 BETWEEN THE 1ST PETITIONER AND 2ND RESPONDENT. ANNEX 4 COPY OF THE PETITION IN OP 539/2011 ON THE FILE OF FAMILY COURT, THRISSUR. ANNEX 5 COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J. -------------------------------- Crl.M.C. No.3485 of 2011 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of October 2011 O R D E R Petitioners are the accused in C.C.No.75/2010 of J.F.C.M.-III, Thrissur. The offence alleged against them is under Sec.498 A r/w 34 IPC. The 2nd respondent is the de facto complainant in that case. It is stated that the parties have settled the matter out of court. The 2nd respondent is represented in this Court by her counsel. Affidavit of the 2nd respondent has been filed which shows that the dispute has already been settled between the parties. In the light of the settlement and as the dispute is purely personal in nature, this Crl.M.C. is allowed. Further proceeding in C.C.No.75/2010 of J.F.C.M.-III, Thrissur is quashed. N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Jvt