@x HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR .VIP-NOF 5.3.55 0f 2004 CORAM: Hon'ble Shri S.R.Nayak, Chief Justice & Hon‘ble Shri D.R.Deshmukh, J. 1. The Central Provident Fund Commissioner, Empioyees Piovident Fund Organ'zation‘ Head Office, 14, Bhikamaji Paiance. New Delhi. 2. Regionai Provident Fund Commissioner-i, 6- 9‘“ Fioor, Pradhikaran Bhawan. Race Course Road. Dr. R.S.Bhandari Marg. lndore- 452003 (M.P.) . 3. Regio‘nai Provident Fund Commissioner Employees provident Fund Organisation. Regional Ofnoe, Pandri, Raipur (C.G.) PETiTlONEBS Versus 1. Mrs. Mini Saiu. W/o Shri Saiu V. Thomas. Rio MD. 38. M.P.Housing Board Colony, Kata, Raipur Chhattisgarh. ‘ 2. Shri Jaye Moha K.. omce of R.P.F.C., Regional omce, Pandri. Raipur (C.G.) 3. Union of lndia, through the Secretary to the Government of lndia, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi. RESPONDENTS: Shri Pradeep saxena, Counsel for the petitioners. Shri P.S.Koshy. Counsel for respondent No.1 Shri Ashok Verma. Counsel for respondent No.3. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 08.09.2006) The following oral order of the Court was passed by 5. R. NAYAK. C.J. The order impugned 'in this writ petition is ex parte order made against the petitioners herein invoking Rule 16 of the Central Administrative Tribunal tProcedure) Rules. 1987 (hereinafter referred to a the Rules). The petitioners without seeking review under Rule 17 have straightaway approached this Court. ln that view of the matter. we dismiss -L- s Eh; the writ petition howaver reserving liberty to the petitioners to seek review of the impugned order under Rule 17 of the Ruies. if they are advised. 2. If such application for review is tiled before the Tribunal within one month from today, the Tribunal shall dispose of such revrew application wrthrn a period of srx months Rom the date submission of rewew of application without reference to the imitation it is open for the petitioners to seek appropriate interim orders before the Tribunal till the disposal of the revrew application to be filed ~ l Sdl— ’ Chief Justice