IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5203 of 2008 DHIRAJ KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5313 of 2008 RAM PRAVESH MEHTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5546 of 2008 NILU KUMARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5552 of 2008 SOMNATH SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5553 of 2008 SADHU SARAN PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5567 of 2008 MANJU SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5574 of 2008 RAJ LAXMI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5580 of 2008 SHAILESH KUMAR MEHTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5588 of 2008 NIRAJ KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5672 of 2008 KUMAR ANJALI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5678 of 2008 PRASHANT KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5679 of 2008 ARUN KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5730 of 2008 SANJEEV KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5753 of 2008 PRATIBHA KUMARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5990 of 2008 AVINASH KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.6003 of 2008 TARIQUE HASMI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.6007 of 2008 HABIBA ASGHARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.6528 of 2008 SHASHI BHUSHAN PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 04.09.2008 These matters have been listed out of turn on a motion slip filed that the petitioners did not wish to argue the matter on merits but wanted an order simpliciter for disposal of their representations When the case is called out learned Counsel for the petitioner reiterates that they do not press the writ application on merits but only seek appropriate orders for disposal of their representations which they propose to file in the light of certain orders of this Court in similar matters. In view of the limited prayer made these writ applications are disposed with directions to the concerned respondent to decide the proposed representation expeditiously in accordance with law. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into merits of the matter which shall remain open for consideration by the concerned respondent in his discretion, in its entirety. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)