CR No.2987 of 2010 (O & M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 18.05.2010 i) CR No.2987 of 2010 (O & M) Manoj Kumar ..Petitioner Versus Municipal Council, Fazilka and another ..Respondents ii) CR No.2988 of 2010 (O & M) Manoj Kumar ..Petitioner Versus Municipal Council, Fazilka and another .. Respondents iii) CR No.2989 of 2010 (O & M) Manoj Kumar ..Petitioner Versus Municipal Council, Fazilka and another .. Respondents iv) CR No.2990 of 2010 (O & M) Manoj Kumar ..Petitioner Versus Municipal Council, Fazilka and another .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI a). Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? b). To be referred to the Reporters or not ? c). Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present:- Mr.K.K.Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Kamal Satija, Advocate for the respondents. AJAY TEWARI J. (ORAL) This order shall dispose of four Civil Revisions bearing CR No.2987 of 2010 (O & M) ::2:: No.2987 of 2010 (O & M), 2988 of 2010 (O & M), 2989 of 2010 (O & M) and 2990 of 2010 (O & M) which address the same issue relating to order dated 21.04.2010 passed by the District Judge, Ferozepur, whereby the application of the petitioner for recalling two witnesses along with relevant record has been dismissed. Learned counsel has argued that the recalling of these witnesses would enable the Court to come to a just conclusion of the cases and that no substantial prejudice would be caused to the respondents and further that in case, if any prejudice is caused to the respondents, they can be compensated by costs. Learned counsel for the respondents has stated that when the said witnesses had originally appeared it was not pointed out that the summoned record had not come. However, learned counsel for the respondents is not in a position to deny that in case the summoned record is produced it would help the Court in coming to a just conclusion of the case. In my considered opinion, it would be in the interest of justice if the impugned order is set aside and one opportunity is granted to the petitioner to recall witnesses namely Rohtash Garg and Prem Kumar along with the record relating to the execution of the work as well as the tender files. Learned counsel has informed me that the cases are fixed for tomorrow. In the circumstances, a direction is issued to learned Trial Court to fix any date convenient to it for this purpose and to permit the petitioner to serve the said witnesses by way of dasti process. This shall be subject to costs of Rs.2500/- in case each to be paid in the form of a draft in favour of respondent No.1. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE May 18, 2010 sukhpreet