^ IN THEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.fStNO. ^^ /2010 PETITIONER <^> Smt. Laxmi Bai widow of Late \-\ .. < Shri Gendram Markam, aged L**' — 1-—..~-<- iC C --———— T^ /- \T1 -.^\" ^•' ^•-•^ RESPONDENTS / y^av^ about 65 years, R/o Village Latiya, Post office Akaltara, District Janjgir Champa C.G. VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretaiy School Education Departaient, DKS Bhawan Raipur C.G. / 2. The Accountant General, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ^3. The District Education Officer, Janjgir-Champa, District Janjgir ChampaC.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MAN DAM US /CERTIORARI ETC, OR DIRECTION/ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC, MAY THIS PLEASE TO YOUR LORDSHIP, The humble petition of the petitioner named above most respectfullyshoweth: - 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER. As mentioned in the cause title. 2. PARTTnTTLARS OF THE RESPONDENT ^^ '•:qT'4l^T,yflly'Ko, 'feTTCTgr . ..^..•.f;.^j..^.:..H'.^A.s 3?I^¥I'V^; (1c!l^1<i4) an^r vs ft-fi* WIT 311^1 **<i<t> (WIW ^W 311^1 SB: Hon'bte Shri Manlndra Mohan Bhrivaslava. J. 23-07-2010 Shri Rakesh Pandey, counsel f|or the petitioner. Shri Ajit Singh, Panel Lawyer on advance copy. Ms. Smita Ghai, Standing cour|sel for respondent No.2. With the consent of learned c()unsel for the parties, the petition is heard finally. This oase pertains to griev^ Learned counsel appearing for the p^tftioner, on instructions, submits that the matter may be referred to the Retif^l Dues Committee. This Court, in the matter ofMV.P.No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & ot^ directed the Committee to consider the question of facts were involved. The +l'<(rt<il"< "RTOHf ^E kvi <h<$i< ^aifimaii^n for the State/respondents No.1 & 3 noe of non-grant of retiral dues. ers) and other connectaJ mattere, matter of retriat dues as the disputed Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuart to the prder dated 19-06-2006 passed in W.P.No.1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai CT|andrakar Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh and others), and order No. 105 of 2008 (StateofChhattisgarhl another). Thus, thjs petition is squarel^ dated 31st January, 2008 passed in ^t/.P.No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal (supra) as submitted by learned couns^l appearing for the parties. This petition is accordingly dis|3osed of in the same terms i.e.,the office of the Advocate General is dlirected to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days dated 13-3-2008 passed in M.C.C. and others Vs. Baijnath Mandal and covered by the judgment andorder from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, theCommittee slfiall issue notice to the petitioner and ^(Rf<^T t^N ^n^'?,. .^"•n<Fira" —FS/I47—2/2010—1,00,000. l^ «11*1CTI a»*liq» 's^t '*twi<'\<i, yaly<i6, fs«niy^< ^....w.lljB^M2^ 31I^['T^T ('iqtl'"l4) sv^y ^i R'ti'k WIT 311^1 ih^i* TOiiw^teian^i —z- 'hllidll') im^f ^f ft1%t <i«<il< ^? affim 3(i^?( Tumane officers concemed within a further pe| consider and pass order, in accord^ opportunity'of'hearing to the petitio| •iod of 15days. The Committee shall nce with law, after affording proper ner. The petitioner and the officers :'l^^w ooncernedTnay;file additional docume^its, ifnecessary. Theentire exercise, ; inGluding payment of retiral dues, if Within a perioi:!' bf four months from any.tothe petitioner, be completed ihe date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petjtioner shall supply oijie complete set of the petition to the State counsel as well as counsel for ffl e Aocountant General for transferring the same to the Committee. In case of grievance with r^gard to non-payment of pensionary tietition before this Court directly, The Imoved before the Retiral Dues lira) Dues Committee shall not refuse dues, it is not necessary to file a writ representation/application can be Committ^, as stated above. The Re< to entertain the representation/applioa1|ion, if so filed directly. Man^^vs!ww Judge »lltl0flsl*T"!;"ll.;i<,!KTTiipT[iT —FS/I47—2/2010 —1,00,000.