WP9128&9391 (1) agk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9128 OF 2010 Vishwas Atmaram Patil & Ors .. Petitioners versus The Ward Officer, Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation & Ors .. Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.9391 OF 2010 Anil Ganpat Nikam & Ors .. Petitioners versus The Ward Officer, Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation & Ors .. Respondents Mr.Rahul S. Thakur for the petitioners. Mr.A.A.Garge for the respondents. CORAM : P.B.MAJMUDAR AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ. DATE : 10th December 2010. P.C.: . The learned counsel for the Thane Corporation states that fresh orders will be passed on the application of the petitioner regarding regularisation within a period of four weeks from today. At the time of considering the same, the concerned officer will consider as to whether the WP9128&9391 (2) nature of the construction can be regularised or not. The order may be passed on individual case basis after considering the nature of the construction. Till fresh decision is taken, the impugned decision for removal may not be implemented. In view of this, learned counsel for the petitioner is not pressing this petition at this stage with liberty to file fresh application, in case, any adverse order is passed on regularisation aspect. Subject to what is observed above, petition is disposed of accordingly. (Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar, J) (P.B.Majmudar, J)