HIGH CGURT 6F CHHAT?§$GARH : BIL§§PUR WRIT PETITION £5} NO. 18% $F 2009 Kanhaiya Lai Paiei (BTI ~ Shiksha Visharagi), aged about 45‘years, snn of Shti Rajiv L chan PateL Assistant Teacher at Gnvt. F3 imary $chool — Makari. Gatapirha‘ Block Sarangarhi'BTahsil Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarhl (CG) Vé'rsug RE$PU§§D:NTS ihe mate of Chhamsgarh thraugh th Secretary, Department of achool Education, Mantralazya Dau Kdlyan Smgh Bhawan Ralpur (CG) The Direciar/Cammissioner, Lak Shikshan Sanchahawya Chhattisgarh Raipur£CG) 3. The domt Director (%count$ Treasury & Pension), Bilaspur (CG\ The Di net Eduaatmn Officer, Districi Ralgarh (CG) (Wm petmon under Article 22o of ihe uonstituiten uf indla) Singte Bench . Hon’ble Shn Satish K. Agnihain, J. h? 4. S‘m Y S Thakuf Dy Advacate Genera! w1ih Shn Amnd Dubey Panel Lawyer for the State ORAL GREER {Passed on this 23m day of Apni 2mm Learned cnunsel appearing for {he petitioner subm‘is that the petmaner does not want ia contesi the matter on merit at this sidge However learned counsei prays thaf the pemroner may be granteo iroe‘ty to make a representaiion before ihe resnondent authorities in the light ofiudgment ofthis Cout‘t in ‘v‘asi‘iwant Kumar Eharadwaj vs. Municipal Corporation, Burn 8: Anr.’ within a period of seven days to consider his case in accordance With taw within a stipuiated period. 2) §hri Thakur learned Dy Adv General anpearing with Shri Dobey teamed Panei Lawyer for the State submits ll‘at in the event a representation re made by the petitioner Within a period of seven days the same shall he considered and decided in accordance With law. on its own merits. within a period of four weeks from the date ofreceipt of the representation. 3) in view of the foregoing, according to learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication ’ tsattsh K Agnihotri udge “ ' sit/— 4) ccordingly. the writ petition stards disposed of A 1 2006 (ii) MPJR-coes ?ETiTi§NER ‘ Present :- Qhri Roop Naik counsel forthe petitioner e " J