K K M IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR {''i'i •""ff ':' tl a '•?• W.P.NO. '3 O ^.S- /2Q06 SllSQ^ fi£^ PETITIONER 1, ..^ ^¥^ 7A-"^-i;y\;5'b..--"" ^ y;-'" ^^' w ^^v yv°\.- ^••" R^SPONDENTS VERSUS 1. 2. N.K-Sharma, S/o. Shri G.R.Sharma, aged about 48 years, R/o. Raipur, 836, Sundar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through fhe Secretary, Departtneat of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Jail Road, Raipur (C.G.) The Conservator of Forest, JaU Road, Raipur (C.G.) The Divisional Forest OfEcer, Raipur East, Raipur (C.G.). A.S.Agrawal, S/o. not known aged about not known Forest Raage Of&cer Laiani, BHaspur Vaa Mandal, Distt. BUaspur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 3. 4. 5. •^' Ift XI-HC-78 3^ -^WM^, BTfl^'IS, Rlc)lti^< ^ *<rqwr a»tnqi ^^.^^bS..[(^ 200 3ii^i ratn (^c|?^s|^!sr) 3ti^r^TR-(i+ traT3IT^Ts»>H[ch s^nwHfersn^T 29-6-2006:- cdunsel fRan s^rvice Shri Anand Kumar Tiwari, Shri Satish Gupta, Depl|ty respondents No.1 to 4 on advance Heard both the counsel. The main grievance raised vide impugned order dated 24-6-3f. the Work Plan Forest Area Surd Government Policy Annexure-P/3| envisages that the Deputy Forest who have completed 5 years of years of age shall be posted in th^ seniority. The petitioner has alreacjy Scheme even then he has been p( that too leaving the dfficers who ar^ Learned counsel for the pet( already made a representation rai^i and respondent No.1 be directe|d learned counsel for respondents N^i Having heard learned couns facts and circumstances of the c< considering the fact that the petit|c Plan Schemew.e.f. 1986to 1989, petitioner is just, fair and reaso|iab directed to consider representatioi^ with the Govemment Policy dated) objective manner, on ite own metit, <!ni<<fci<fli *iii<iT^'te3'<Ri't<i< ^srf^Tail^r for the petitioner. Govt. Advocate for the State/ opy. |?y the petitioner by this petition is that ]006 the petitioner has been posted in juja on special duty contrary to the dated 18-7-2005, clasue-1 of which igers and the Forest Range Officers and who have not completed 50 Work Plan Scheme according to their completed 3 years in the Work Plan asted again in the Work Plan Scheme, seniors to him. jtioner submitted that the petitioner has ting his grievances to respondent No.1 to decide representation to which i.1 to 4 has no objection. |el for the parties, having regard to the ise, having perused seniority list and joner has already worked in the Work t>rayer made by tearned counsel for the le, therefore, respondent No.1 is made by the petitioner in accordance 18-7-2005 and decide the same in an t, within a period of one month from 'weitWSfii^S^S^sK^^^^^^^i^^^SS'kSii.l.Si^wsS^Ki^.k^-s^sSlSS' i" 'l r^^ 8ii B^, M i' B. XI-HC-78 3S? '<<1<11<'1<<, »Tn<f'16, RlClltiy *TTHCtT »Wfr WS^ 200 3li^<?i <4acn (yt^ayT) 3n^fwi?:mi creT371^Tsht| Barve ^.^ ?TdIWflfef 3I1^?T today, in accordance with law. shall remain stayed, if he The writ petition is disposed Consequently, M.(W.)P. No. Parties areentitled for certifi Tlil then, the petitioner's transfer order not relieved. |of accordingly. ^341/2006 stands disposed of. ^d copy ofthis order. Sdf- L.C.Bhadoo Judge qil<lt<1<fl-< 1|t|(lT?fts<<Il <Rlt^K ^?3ri^iTgn^r affiBJ