1 Criminal Application No.1379/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1379 OF 2011 The State of Maharashtra ... APPLICANT VERSUS Tukaram Bansilal Mali ... RESPONDENT ..... Shri N.B. Patil, A.P.P. for applicant/State Shri J.R. Shah, Advocate for respondent ..... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 2nd May, 2011 PER COURT : 1. Heard finally. The deceased was allegedly chased while alighting railway and done to death, attributing principal role to the respondent/ Tukaram. Mobile call details allegedly traced to the involvement of the accused/respondent Tukaram. He was in custody from 20.11.2010 to 14.12.2010. 2. Learned A.P.P. submits, during further investigation, as charge sheet is yet to be filed, the investigator has collected mobile details showing user of mobile handset with double Sim Card facility by the accused/ applicant, which indeed was used by the deceased immediately before his death. 2 Criminal Application No.1379/2011 3. Several statemnets of inter-se mobile contacts slashed by learned A.P.P. can be enquired into without accused/ applicant putting in fetters. Since the investigator is equipped with the details, no further interrogation is required. At the most if anybody identifies the accused/ applicant, or disowns of receiving the call, it can be ascertained with the accused/ applicant, however, for that custody is not the solution. 4. In the result, for the present, application seeking cancellation of bail already granted by order dated 14.12.2010, is not entertained. However, the respondent Tukaram Bansilal Mali shall make himself available to the investigator on every alternate day between 10.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m. till 30th June 2011. The accused/ applicant shall reply to the queries put by the investigator about user of the mobile handset and the calls made to the persons as referred in the extract of mobile company. Application rejected, finally disposed of. K.U. CHANDIWAL JUDGE fmp/cri1379.11