CWP (T) No.6625 of 2008 7.9.2010 Present: Mr. Rakesh Dogra, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Anil Jaswal, Dy. Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2. None for respondent No.3. The matter was heard for some time. According to learned counsel for the respondents, no benefit of the pension scheme could be accorded to the predecessor-in-interest of the present petitioners (legal heirs) as scheme was introduced much after his retirement. There is no dispute about this fact. However, according to learned counsel for the petitioner benefits have been accorded to similarly situated persons. Admittedly, there is no mention about this fact in the petition nor is there any material to support the same. 2. Faced with this position, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions from his client, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to make a detailed representation by annexing the documents in support thereof. Liberty granted. 3. Representation be positively made within a period of four weeks from today. Any such representation made be considered and decided by the appropriate authority within a period of three months from the date of receipt thereof. Needless to add representation shall be decided by passing a speaking order, which shall be communicated to the petitioner. If need be, opportunity of hearing be also afforded to the petitioner. 3. With the aforesaid observations, the present petition is disposed of. 7th September, 2010 (Sanjay Karol) (C) Judge.