IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11691 of 2010 SURYA NANDAN PRASAD, son of Late Yamuna Prasad, resident of Village Govindpur, P.O. Basantpur, Via-Bakhra, P.S. Saraiya, District Muzaffarpur. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Executive Engineer, Tube Well Division, Muzaffarpur. 3. The District Provident Fund Officer, Muzaffarpur, Distt. Muzaffarpur. 4. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 26.7.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State as also the Accountant General. The petitioner retired on 31st of March, 1993 from the post of Tubewell Operator under respondent no.2. His grievance is with regard to the revision of pension with effect from 1.1.1996 in the light of the Finance Department’s Resolution No.11558 dated 22nd of December, 1999, as contained in Annexure 2. It is submitted that the above grievance has not been redressed despite representation. Learned counsel for the State submits that the claim of the petitioner needs to be verified from the record. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Executive Engineer, Tube-well Division, Muzaffarpur (respondent no.2), with a copy to the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna (respondent no.4). In case such a representation is filed stating distinctly the details of his claims as also enclosing the copy of the 2 relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)