.[1]. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1168 OF 2006 Sudhakar R. Kurlekar ...Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents. .... Ms.Ushah Purohit, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.G.W.Mattos, A.G.P.,for the Respondents. .... CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : JUNE 26, 2006. JUNE 26, 2006. JUNE 26, 2006. P.C.: . Considering the points set out in Para 2 of the affidavit, this would not be a case for Us to exercise our extraordinary jurisdiction, as the petition raises disputed questions of fact. It is open to the petitioner to move the competent authority or Civil Court for whatever reliefs he is entitled to in law. With the above observation, Petition stands disposed of. [F.I.REBELLO,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]