IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.712 of 2008 ANIL KUMAR Versus SMT. SITA DEVI With C.R. No. 1886 of 2007 Anil Kumar Vs. Smt. Sita Devi --------- 6 31/7/2008 This case has been listed at the instance of counsel for the petitioner who would submit that there is inadvertent error in the order dated 1.7.2008, may be typographical, wherein in page-2 third paragraph fourth line wherein the figure Rs.2000/- ought to have been Rs. 1000/-. Explaining this aspect Mr. Verma, counsel for the petitioner has said that actually court below had fixed installment Rs. 1500/- per month and therefore, this Court while intending to give relief of amount in installment had actually intended to Rs. 1000/- instead of Rs. 2,000/- and that is why there an order for payment of Rs. 1000/- towards arrear in addition to Rs. 1000/- being the current amount had been passed by this Court. Mr. Verma seems to be correct. Accordingly, the figure Rs. 2000/- in page-2 third paragraph fourth line will be read as Rs. 1000/- instead of Rs. 2000/-. The order dated 1.7.2008 is modified to the aforementioned extent. ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J. ) Abhay Kumar