IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 8321/2008 Decided on:7.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Sardari Lal. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. ____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). The petitioner has sought direction to the respondents to consider his case. The petition was filed in the year 2002. The relief prayed for cannot be granted at this stage. Accordingly, the petition is closed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 7.12.2010 *awasthi* 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?