IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 10235 of 2011-D & connected matters. Decided on: December 1, 2011. 1. CWP No. 10235 of 2011-D. Medar Singh. Vrs. State of H.P. & ors. 2. CWP No. 10237 of 2011-D. Mohan Lal Chauhan. Vrs. State of H.P. & ors. 3. CWP No. 10238 of 2011-D. Mehar Chand. Vrs. State of H.P. & ors. 4. CWP No. 10239 of 2011-D. Ashok Kumar & ors. Vrs. State of H.P. & ors. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioners: Ms. Nishi Goel, Advocate, vice counsel. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) These writ petitions have been filed with similar set of prayers and one such main prayer in CWP No. 10235 of 2011-D, reads as follows: “(i)) That the respondent department may be directed to count the ad hoc service of petition as Language Teacher with effect from 14.3.1985 followed by regularization on the said post without interruption, with effect from 28.6.1996, towards increments and other service benefits, including pensionary benefits, with all consequential benefits.” 2. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP No. 4550 of 2010, Ravi Kumar vrs. State of H.P. & another. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. The petitioners submit that they would file appropriate representation(s) furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for them to do so. As and when the same is made, the second respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a 2 copy of the writ petition(s) by the petitioner concerned before the second respondent. 3. The Writ Petitions are disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. December 1, 2011, ( Justice Rajiv Sharma), (karan/vs) Judge.