:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1117 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1117 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1117 OF 2006 IN IN IN APPEAL NO. 142 OF 2006 APPEAL NO. 142 OF 2006 APPEAL NO. 142 OF 2006 Ramesh Tikamdas Bajaj ..Appellant versus Vinod Tikamdas Bajaj & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. P. S. Gidwani for the Appellant. Ms. R. C. Nichani for the Respondent No.1. Mr. Uday Bobde for the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & S. J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. S. J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. S. J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATE : 13TH APRIL, 2006 DATE : 13TH APRIL, 2006 DATE : 13TH APRIL, 2006 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : . Heard learned counsel for the Appellant and the Respondents. Appeal is already admitted. Perused the Affidavit in Support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated in the Affidavit of Support, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Notice of Motion disposed of accordingly. (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ) (S. J. VAZIFDAR, J.) (S. J. VAZIFDAR, J.) (S. J. VAZIFDAR, J.)