IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 110 OF 2007 BANK OF GOA, THE MAPUSA URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK OF GOA LTD. AND ANR., ... Appellants Versus SHRI. ALVARO COLACO ... Respondent Mr. J. J. Mulgaonkar, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. N. N. Sardessai, Advocate for the respondent. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 27th November, 2008 P.C. Heard Mr. Mulgaonkar for the appellants and Mr. Sardessai for the respondent. By this appeal, the appellants take exception to the order dated 17.08.2007 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Vasco in Special Civil Suit No.9/2007/A, by which the Trial Court has granted injunction in favour of respondent/plaintiff, in respect of the suit properties under the Secutarisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and/or to proceed with the action as contemplated in the notice dated 15.12.2006. Mr. Mulgaonkar, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the injunction order passed by the Trial Court is patently without jurisdiction. He further submitted that in the event this Court is not inclined to entertain the appeal, all the issues raised by the appellant before the Trial Court be kept open. Per contra, Mr. Sardessai, learned counsel for the respondents submited that the impugned order is passed by the Trial Court by following the well settled principles governing the grant of injunction and therefore, no interference is called for by this Court. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. Needless to mention that the findings given by the Trial Court while disposing of the application for injunction are prima facie only for the limited purpose of deciding the application for injunction. The Trial Court shall decide all the issues including the maintainability of the suit in accordance with law. The appeal is disposed of. A. P. LAVANDE, J. lh/.