C-482 No. 25 of 2008 Hon'ble B.C. Kandpal, J. By way of this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 11.12.2007 passed by Judge Family Court, Udham Singh Nagar in Case No. 311 of 2007, under Section 125 Cr.P.C., Smt. Goldi Vs Jitendra Sahni. Heard Sri K.S. Bora and Sri M.K. Ray, learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. The impugned order shows that the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was filed by the respondent No. 2 - Goldi before the court concerned and the court vide impugned order dated 11.12.2007 has issued the direction for registering the case only. The court has also directed that the notices be issued to the husband i.e. Jitendra Sahni who is the petitioner before this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that Goldi is not legally wedded wife. Therefore, she is not entitled for any amount of maintenance from the petitioner. This arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner appears to be premature as the petitioner has still a right to file the written statement in the proceeding pending before the court of Judge, Family Court, Udham Singh Nagar. He may raise this plea in the written statements to be filed by him before the court concerned. With the aforesaid observation, the petition is dismissed being premature at this stage. (B.C.K., J.) 10.01.2008 ASWAL