IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2961 of 2007 1.(a)HAFIZ (b)ASFAK, (C)ANJUL (d)MAKSUD ALL SONS OF DECEASED PETITIONER NO.1, S.K. ALLUDDIN. (e)BIBI JAMINA, W/O DECEASED PETITIONER NO.1, S.K. ALLAUDDIN (f) BIBI FIROZA, (g) BIBI ROJILA, (h) BIBI MURSIDA, (i) BIBI KURSID, ALL DAUGHTERS OF DECEASED APPELLANT NO.1, S.K.ALLUDDIN APPELLANTS NO.1(a) to 1(i) ARE HEIRS OF PETITIONER NO.1, NOW DECEASED, SK. ALLAUDDIN. 2. S.K. SALAMAT, S/O S.K. SABHANI ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE RAMASI TOLA MURGAICHAK, P.S. SANHAULA, DISTRICT-BHAGALPUR. -PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-PETITIONERS Versus 1 (a) S.K. MARU S/O JAMDALI, (b) (i) HADISA KHATOON W/O LATE MD. SULEMAN @ SULLI (ii) SARIF @ SARFU S/O LATE MD. SULEMAN @ SULLI (iii) MD. GUDDU, (iv) MD. YASIN, MINOR SONS OF MD. SULEMAN @ SULLI THROUGH NEXT FRIEND AND GUARDIAN, MOTHERS (v) RUHI KHATOON, (vi)JUBEDA KHATOON, MINOR DAUGHTERS OF LATE MD. SULEMAN @ SULLI, THROUGH NEXT FRIEND AND GUARDIAN, MOTHER ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE/MAUZA RAMASI, TOLA MURGIACHAK, P.O. & P.S. SANHAULA, DISTRICT BHAGALPUR. (b)(vii) BIBI JAHIRA, W/O MD. RAFIQUE, R/O POST KASBA, THANA MAHAGMA, DISTRICT GODDA. -OPP. PARTIES NO.1(b)(i) to 1(b)(vii) ARE PROPOSED OPPOSITE PARTIES (LEGAL HEIRS OF MD. SULEMAN @ SULLI, S/O JAMDALI O.P.NO.1(b). ( c) SK.EQBAL, S/O JAMDALI, R/O VILLAGE/MAUZA RAMASI, TOLA MURGIACHAK, P.O. & P.S. SANHAULA DISTRICT-BHAGALPUR. 2 2. SK. SAMSUL, 3. SK BAUDHA, 4. SK MANSOOR, 5. BIBI LATIFAN, 6. BIBI ZAITUN, 7. BIBI KARI. ALL SONS AND DAUGHTERS OF LATE SK. GHAFOOR S/O LATE AMANAT, R/O VILLAGE RAMASI, TOLA MURGIACHAK, P.O. & P.S. SANAHAULA DISTRICT- BHAGALPUR. -DEFENDANT 1ST SET, RESPONDENT 1ST SET, O.P 1ST SET. 8. SK. DARAF ALI, S/O LATE SK.SABIR 9. SK. JAMAUDDIN, S/O LATE NAZIR ALI, S/O LATE SK. SABIR. 10. BIBI KAPOORAN, 11. BIBI SAFIDAN @ SAFFO 12. BIBI KUSMI, 13. BIBI SUKHO, 14. BIBI TAMIZAN, ALL DAUGHTERS OF LATE SK. AMANAT, S/O SK. AMDOO 15. SK. NAMANI, 16. SK. ISMAIL SONS OF LATE MOST HAFFO, S/O AMDOO, DECEASED 17. SI SHAHBUDDIN, 18. SK. TAYAB, S/O LATE GHOTTAN ALL R/O VILLAGE PARSANDA, THANA MAHAGMA, DISTRICT GODDA (JHARKHAND) EXCEPT OPPOSITE PARTY NO.13 BIBI SUKHO R/O VILLAGE HASAI, P.S. DHORAIYA, DISTRICT-BANKA -DEFENDANTS IIND SET, RESPONDENT IIND SET, OPPOSITE PARTIES IIND SET. 19. MD. SASIM, 20. MD. LATIF, SONS OF LATE MOST HABOO AND SK. BUDHOO BOTH R/O VILLAGE DALHA, P.O.PARSANDA, DISTRICT-GODDA (JHARKHAND) 21. SK. GAFOOR, 22. MD. LEAKAT, 23. BIBI ASHO, SONS & DAUGHTERS OF LATE ZAHROO ALL R/O VILLAGE BAIRIYA, P.O. LARENI, P.S. MAHAGMA, DISTRICT-GODDA (JHARKHAND) 24. SK. ALLAUDDIN, SON OF BIBI BASHIRAN AND SK. KHESARI, R/O VILLAGE SEKHOOCHAK, MAHAGMA, P.S. MAHAGMA, DISTRICT-GODDA, (JHARKHAND). 25. BIBI CHAMNI D/O LATE MOST SAFIDAN, R/O VILLAGE GODKACHAK, P.S. DHORAIYA, DISTRICT- BHAGALPUR. -DEFENDANT IIIRD SET, RESPONDENT, OPPOSITE PARTIES IIIRD SET. 26.(a) SK. KHALIL, S/O LATE SK. AZHARUL, (O.P. NO.26) 3 SON OF LATE GHYAS ALI (b) BIBI SHAMINA, (c) BIBI ROSHIA, (d) BIBI HOSHIA ALL DAUGHTERS OF LATE SK. AZHARUL (O.P. NO.26) S/O LATE GHYAS ALI R/O VILLAGE RAMASI, TOLA-MURGIACHAK, P.S. SANHAULA, DISTRICT-BHAGALPUR. -O.P. NOS.26(a) to 26(d) ARE PROPOSED OPPOSITE PARTIES (LEGAL HEIRS OF LATE SK. AZHARUL (O.P.NO.26, SON OF LATE GHYAS ALI. 27. SK. ILYAS, SON OF LATE GHYAS ALI 28.(a) BIBI RASHIDAN, WIFE OF LATE SK. LEAKAT (O.P.28), S/O SUBHANI (b) MD. ISHAQ, (c) MD. SALIM, (d) MD. FAZIR, ALL SONS OF LATE S.K. LEAKAT (O.P.28) S/O SUBHANI (e) BIBI BECHNI, (f) BIBI HAMIDA, BOTH DAUGHTERS OF SK. LEAKAT (O.P.28) -O.P.NOS. 28(a) to 28(f) ARE PROPOSED OPPOSITE PARTIES (LEGAL HEIRS OF O.P. NO.28, LATE SK. LEAKAT S/O SK. SUBHANI) 29. BIBI TAJO, 30. BIBI MAJO. 31. MD. FAKRUDDIN, ALL SONS AND DAUGHTERS OF SK.SUBHANI 32. MD. ASHGAR 33. SK. HAMID, 34. SK. OKIL, ALL SONS OF LATE BIBI ZAMIRAN AND SK. SAMEULLAH (DECEASED) -- ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE RAMASI TOLA, MURGIACHAK, P.S. SANHAULA EXCEPT OPPOSITE PARTIES NO.29 AND 30 WHO ARE RESIDENTS OF GALAKACHAL AND CHAKAMZA, THANA SANHAULA, DISTRICT-BHAGALPUR AND OPPOSITE PARTIES NO.31 TO 33 RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE MAHLA, P.S. DHORAIYA, DISTRICT-BANKA. --PLAINTIFF –APPELLANT --OPPOSITE PARTRIES 1VTH SET --OPPOSITE PARTIES. 3 12.02.2009 This application has been filed for restoration of MJC no. 2546 of 2003 which has been dismissed against opposite parties no.8 to 24 for non-compliance of the 4 peremptory order dated 6.9.2007. MJC no. 2546 of 2003 was filed for restoration of Civil Revision no. 1337 of 2002 which was dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 5.9.2003. Mr. Parul Ranjan, appears on behalf of the petitioners. There does not seem to be any justification for not complying the order dated 6.9.2007. Petitioners have also defaulted in complying the peremptory order passed in Civil Revision application. From the aforesaid, it is evident that they are not diligent in pursuing the application. In my opinion, the ground set forth is not sufficient to restore the application. The application stands dismissed. (C.K. Prasad, ACJ.) AAhmad