IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2009 SMT. DEEPA TARI ... Petitioner Versus DNYANESHWAR PRABHAKAR SHET AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Shivan Dessai,Learned Counsel for the Petitioner. Coram:- C. L. PANGARKAR, J. Date:- 13th January, 2009 P.C.: Heard Learned Counsel for the Petitioner. 2. The criminal revision is preferred by the accused who was convicted and the conviction was confirmed by the Appellate Court. The accused/petitioner and the original complainant is present before the Court. The original complainant states that he has received an amount of cheque and, therefore, he does not wish to prosecute the complaint further. In view of the same, the complaint is dismissed and the accused stands acquitted. It is stated by the learned Counsel for the respondent that a sum of Rs.50,000/- has already been deposited by the accused before the Sessions Judge in fixed deposit. The respondent is entitled to withdraw the amount from the Sessions Court. C. L. PANGARKAR, J. ah