Crl.M.No.14854 of 2011(O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.14854 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: May 17, 2011 Daljit Singh @ Sab .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Navkkiran Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.No.26765 of 2011 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-14854 of 2011 The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.10, dated 17.1.2010, under Sections 307, 324, 323, 341, 148, 149 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Bilga, District Jalandhar. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully, including the impugned order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jalandhar, vide which application filed by petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail has been dismissed. This is second application for anticipatory bail filed on behalf of the petitioner-accused before this Court. Earlier he moved anticipatory bail application before learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jalandhar, which was dismissed on 3.8.2010. Earlier application for anticipatory bail filed by petitioner-accused was dismissed by this Court on merit vide order dated Crl.M.No.14854 of 2011(O&M) -2- 1.9.2010, passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.M-25632 of 2010. Allegations against petitioner -accused are that he alongwith co-accused attacked the complainant while armed with deadly weapons. Petitioner was armed with a rod, whereas co-accused was armed with fire- arm. In all eight injuries were caused to the complainant, out of which three injuries have been attributed to the petitioner. Complainant was allegedly way-laid by petitioner and co-accused, who had come in a vehicle and attacked him. Learned counsel for the petitioner-accused contends that there are some change in circumstances on the plea that he was declared innocent by the police and, however, again he is sought to be arrested in this case. The present FIR is dated 17.1.2010 and since then petitioner is absconding. Allegations are serious in nature. Hence, it is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner-accused. Hence, in view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner- Daljit Singh @ Sab for grant of anticipatory bail is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit. 17.5.2011 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge