IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 10858 of 2005 Between: 1 Vani Jayalakshmi Educational Society, Registration No. 95/80, Pathapeta, Dhone, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh. 2 Vani Jayalakshmi High School, Pathapeta, Dhone, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Government of AP, rep by its Secretary, Department of School Education, AP Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Director of Public Examinations, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh. 3 The Board of Secondary School Education, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh. 4 The Regional Joint Director of School Education, Cuddapah, Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Secretary 5 The District Educational Officer, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh. 6 The Deputy Educational Officer, Dhone, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in withholding the 10th class results of the students of the petitioners by orders dated 27-4- 2005 as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the AP Education Act, 1982 and the AP Educational Institutions (Establishment, Recognition, Administration and control of Schools under private Managements) Rules, 1993, and unconstitutional and consequently direct the Respondents to forthwith grant permission/recognition to the petitioner and pass such other order or orders deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.SRINIVASA RAO BODDULURI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 10858 OF 2005 ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and thereby the writ petition has become infructuous. In that view of the matter, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _____________________________ Justice B.Seshasayana Reddy 11th June, 2009. KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 10858 OF 2005 11th June, 2009.