IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7602 of 2011 1. BINOD KUMAR SINHA son of Late Ram Deo Narayan 2. Madhu Sudan Prasad Verma, s/o Chaudhary Jagdish Narayan. Both residents of Mohalla- Menon Gali (Shivshankar Path) Club Road, P.S. Mithanpura, P.O. Ramna, District- Muzaffarpur. . . . . . . Petitioners. Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA through the Secretary, Information and Broad-casting Corporation, New Delhi. 2. The State of Bihar, through Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Secretary, Department of Forest and Environment, Bihar, Patna. 4. The Secretary, Department of Building Construction, Bihar, Patna. 5. The Secretary, Department of Disaster Management, Bihar, Patna. 6. The Secretary, Department of Urban Development, Bihar, Patna. 7. The Collector, Muzaffarpur. 8. The Sub-Divisional Officer, East, Muzaffarpur. 9. The Urban Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Muzaffarpur. 10. The Member Secretary, Bihar State Pollution Control Board, Beltron Bhawan, Shastri Nagar, Patna. 11. The General Manager, Idea Mobile, Aditya Birla Telecom Ltd. 1st Floor, Sumitra Sadan, Boring Canal Road, Near Boring Road, Patna-1. 12. The General Manager, GTL Infrastructure Markeday Complex, 3rd Floor, Rajendra Nagar, Patna-16. 13. Smt. Nita W/o Sri Rajiv Kumar, R/o Menan Gali, Shiv Shankar Path, Club Road, P.S. Mithnpura, P.O. Ramna, District- Muzaffarpur. . . . . . . Respondents. ----------- 2/ 29.04.2011 Heard Mr. Manoj Kumar Manoj, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, Mr. Shivendra Kishore, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.10, and Mr. Brajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Counsel to Additional Advocate General No.XI, appearing for respondent nos. 2 to 8. In the instant writ application, which has been filed by way of Public Interest Litigation, the petitioners have made objection to installation of Mobile Tower on the roof top of Smt. Nita, wife of Rajiv Kumar, R/o Menan Gali, Shiv Shankar Path, Club Road, P.S. Mithnpura, P.O. Ramna, District- Muzaffarpur. The petitioners submit that installation of Mobile 2 Tower would otherwise adversely affect the hygiene and health of the people living in the locality. Mr. Shivendra Kishore, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.10, submits that two years back a Mobile Tower was installed on the roof top of respondent no.13 but no objections was made at the relevant time. Now the second tower is going to be installed on the aforesaid roof of respondent no.13 but the objections are being raised. Having heard counsel for the parties, in view of the aforesaid, we do not wish to go into the matter whether the instant writ application can be filed at the behest of the petitioners. It appears that petitioners have filed representation before the Bihar State Pollution Control Board. It will be open to the petitioners to pursue their representations before the Corporation concerned. With the aforesaid liberty, this writ application is disposed of. Uday/ (S. K. Katriar, J.) (S. P. Singh, J.)