FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WP/2955/2001 VIJAY KASHINATH WANI AND ANR V/S REHABILITATION COUNCIL AND ORS ... 1. None present for the petitioners. Heard learned counsel for respective respondents. 2. In this petition on 2.8.2001 Rule was granted but interim relief was not granted. On 15.6.2010, none appeared for the petitioners. The matter was adjourned to 16.6.2010. Thereafter, on 23.8.2010, at the request of learned AGP, the petition was adjourned to 14.9.2010. None appeared for the petitioners on that day also. 3. With the assistance of the learned AGP, we have gone through the petition so also perused the reliefs sought. The petitioners claim to have completed Diploma in Education for Hearing Impaired (D.S.E.H.I.) in the year 1995-96 from respondent No.5 institute. We have also considered the pleadings as regards filing of earlier Writ Petition No.2710 of 2000 by the petitioners and order passed by this Court allowing the same partly on 10.11.2000. The petitioners have raised a grievance that respondent - RCI ought to have given grace of five marks to the petitioners and ought to have given sufficient time to appear for the examination. 4. After considering the pleadings, in our FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS opinion, over the years lapsed, the petition has become infructuous and needs to be dismissed as such. 5. In the result, Writ Petition stands dismissed. Rule discharged. No order as to costs. (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.) (S.B.DESHMUKH, J.) Dt.15.9.2010 akl