THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO :29348 of 2011 Dated: 12.12.2011 Between: G. Ratnakumari. ..Petitioner And 1. The Authorized Officer, Axis Bank, Vijayawada. ..Respondent This Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD W.P.No.29348 of 2011 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice N.V. Ramana) This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondent not to confirm the sale of the schedule property conducted on 28.10.2011. It is the case of the petitioner that she mortgaged the schedule property with the respondent-Bank as security to the loan amount obtained by M/s. Radhika Enterprizes & F.S. Furniture and that the respondent-Bank conducted auction of her properties without following the procedure and without issuing any notice and therefore, the auction proceedings conducted by the Bank are illegal and arbitrary. On 2.11.2011, while admitting the writ petition, this Court issued interim direction to the respondent-Bank not to confirm the sale of the schedule property auctioned on 28.10.2011, subject to the condition of the petitioner depositing Rs.25,00,000/-, within a period of four weeks from that day. It was also made clear that in case of default in deposit of the said amount, the respondent-Bank is at liberty to proceed further. On 1.12.2011, when the matter was taken up, the learned Counsel for the respondent brought to the notice of this Court that the conditional order dated 2.11.2011 was not complied with, whereas learned Counsel for the petitioner while disputing the same, sought time for producing material in proof of compliance. Hence, this matter was adjourned to 8.12.2011. On 8.12.2011, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption “for dismissal”. Today, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner though the matter was under the caption “for dismissal”, and the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent-Bank again submitted that the conditional order dated 2.11.2011 was not complied with. In the above circumstances and in view of the non-compliance of the conditional order passed by this Court, we are not inclined to entertain this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. __________________ Justice N.V. Ramana DATE: 12.12.2011 ____________________ Justice P. Durga Prasad nn THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD W.P.No.29348 of 2011 (Order delivered by the Hon’ble Sri Justice N.V. Ramana) 12.12.2011 Nn