SBCWP4481/2010 // 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4481/2010 Mukesh S/o Shri Damodar Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others Date of Order ::: 02.04.2010 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri B.M. Sharma, Counsel for petitioner #### By the Court:- Grievance of petitioner is that he was already working on the post of Mate under National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (Rajasthan) with respondent Department having been engaged on 25.02.2008. Respondents however discontinued him from service from 15.11.2009. Shri B.M. Sharma, learned counsel for petitioner, submitted that respondents have now invited fresh applications by Notification dated 12.06.2009 and are going to make fresh appointments. Learned counsel invited attention of Court towards Circular issued by the respondent Department on 15.06.2009 to say that such of Mates who had earlier worked and are trained, would be given priority in the matter of appointment if no complaint is found against them. SBCWP4481/2010 // 2 // There is no reason that petitioner would not be given priority in the matter of appointment if actually there is no complaint against him because that is the condition precedent prescribed by respondents in their Circular dated 15.06.2009. From job card produced by petitioner also it is evident that he was working with them till 31.10.2009, that means starting from 02.04.2008 upto 31.10.2009 he worked with them as Mate. Having regard to the facts of this case, this writ petition is disposed of requiring petitioner to make a representation to District Collector, Bharatpur, who shall examine petitioner's grievance and if he finds that there was no complaint with petitioner's work at the time of his earlier engagement, then he be given priority in the matter of appointment in the light of Government Circular dated 15.06.2009. Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed of. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. //Jaiman//