IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.836-M of 2010 Date of Decision:25.2.2010 Brij Lal .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. V.D. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pardeep Virk, D.A.G. Haryana. Mr. Manoj Kaushik, Advocate for the complainant. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. It is stated that the petitioner has been attributed only simple injury alleged to be inflicted by Danda. It is further stated that the grievous injury has been attributed to co-accused Sukhbir and not to the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 13.12.2009. Bail to the satisfaction of Trial Court. 25.2.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE