IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38507 of 2010 VINAY KUMAR SINGH @ VINAY SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 11.3.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Survey work for installation of plant of N.T.P.C. was being protested by a mob consisting of more than 100 people in which members of the Survey Team were assaulted, some of their articles including wrist watch and cash were snatched. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R., his name was later added without any basis of receiving further circumstance. He is named by injured officials also but with parentage having no occasion to know the identification of this petitioner that also without any overt act. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial 2 Magistrate, Aurangabad in Barun P.S. Case No. 9/2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)