IN THE: HIGH. CQVS.T OF JUDXe&TQRE AT BIIASPUR (C.G.) WRTT PETITION N0. '32.Z / 2002 petitioner 111-31 Responden'bs ^o •^ -^c^^ ^..-•^"^^' ,. •••••:^-'A,fe).^- .V : Sukhade®Das s/o Mehattar Oas Manikpuri,aged abou'fc 28 years, R/o» village Dhorabhata, P.S. Kaadol, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) V ER S U S i 1) /'The state of Chha-fc-tisgarli, through the Secretary Departroent of panchayafc , Man-tralay,' D.K.Building» Raipyr (C.G.) 2) collec-tor,' Raipur Distt. Raipur. 3) Chief Executive Officer, janpad Panchayat, Kasdol, Distt, Raipur 4} Block Education Officer, Kasdol, Bistt. Raipup (G.G.) WRIT PETITION U3SDER ARTICI,BS 226/ 227 OFTHE CONS'TITUTIOH . OF INDXA. ^ 5-[[q^T | •g^- ^ll^l^i), 'dTll^lCc, I<S(C1I^I1-! .to.!():..y».o... 311X^1 •^tflIWHfttI State. ^P»t"^ft-;tITtRfl'? fet?t TteZR •^sTraqsn^ Shmiiati Renu Kochar, cou4.sel for the Petitioner. Shri Saajay K. Agrawal, Cjy. Advocate General for fhe Heard. The petitioner has filed fhis] petition against the inaction of the respondents whereby fti^y have not appointed the petitioner on the post of Shiks^ia Kanni Gr. III to which, according to the petitioner, he is eijititled. It is submitted on behalf of pie petitioner that he is more cligible ftian thc pcrsons who have| Haviiig considcrcd fhc fact^ case and inaterial on record, in th( of justice wiU serve if a du-ection inake a detailed 'representatioa alc^n to fhe coinpetent authority withia| oa. such representation beiag fil^< shall decide fhe saine bv accordance with law withni tevo bccn giycD. appointm.cnt. . aud circuiastaiiccs of thc opuuon of this Court, ends is given to fhe petitioner to with a copy of this order iiftEen davs froin todav aud l^d fhe coinpetent authority pas^iag a reasoned order ia inonths froiu fhe date of [Tfr^ ^SiS^ ?;-KC-22 SIR^I^iT T?;If!R3Tls?l | iRTIWffl?^ •s^ ^mCTq, 'sTftwTs, hv\wy. 3i^i i^mw ^ifei '^'fezft^ 'wi?ff'? f3T?> <rai^it i? aifigtf a^ If any adverse order is passed aggrieved, he inay file the ^aid order. It is niade clear tbat feHs production of representation. and fhe petitioner theieby petition afresh chatlenguig fhe this Court has not expressed ajny optnion on ihe inerits of the case. With fhe aforesaid obs^rvations, fhis petition staiids disposed of. e [^•?fe^