WP(C) 5719/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE I A ANSARI Heard Mr. S K N Mahammad, learned counsel for the writ petitioner, who has produ ced a copy of the order, dated 14.06.2011, issued by the respondent No. 2, namel y, Director of Sericulture, Assam. Heard also Mr. B. J. Ghosh, learned Governme nt Advocate, appearing on behalf of respondents. From the copy of the ord er, dated 14.06.2011, issued by the Director of Sericulture, Assam, what transpi res is that a de novo enquiry, which had been conducted against the present peti tioner, could not prove the charges, which had been levelled against the present petitioner and basing upon which the petitioner had been suspended and, eventua lly, dismissed from service, and that the petitioner has accordingly been reinst ated in service w.e.f. 18.06.2010 and has been allowed to draw all arrear pay an d allowances in respect of the period of suspension as well as dismissal, i.e., w.e.f. 18.05.2007 to 18.06.2010, with, of course, a warning to the petitioner to conduct himself properly in public duty in future. In view of the fact that the grievances of the petitioner have been subs tantially met, it is submitted by Mr. S K N Mahammad, learned counsel for the pe titioner, that this writ petition has become infructuous and the same may accord ingly be disposed of. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. A copy of the order, dated 14.06.2011, aforementioned, produced by the l earned counsel for the petitioner, be kept with the records of this writ petitio n.