IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 207 OF 2008 Mr.Yashwant Sumant Lone. ... Appellant. V/s. Mrs.Minal Maruti Handal and others. ... Respondents. P.V.Samant for the appellant. S.M.Sabrad for the respondents. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. DATED : 24th September 2009. P.C. : Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. I was taken through the order of the lower appellate Court as well as that of trial Court. The lower appellate Court has appreciated documentary as well as oral evidence and reached to the conclusion holding that the present respondents were the owner of the property in question and that the present appellant was gratuitous licensee of the house No.1334. The entire findings recorded by the lower appellate Court revolve around documentary as well as oral evidence as well circumstances brought on record. In these circumstance, appeal is liable to be dismissed for want of substantial question of law. 3. At this stage, learned counsel for the appellant prays for time to vacate the suit premises. Learned counsel for the respondents opposed this prayer. However, I am inclined to grant time to the appellant to vacate suit premises, subject to undertaking to this Court that he will vacate the suit premises on or before expiry of six months from today without any demur or obstruction and shall not create any third party interest, failing which respondents shall be entitled to execute the decree in accordance with law. Needless to mention that the undertaking shall be signed by all the adult members of the family of the appellant. 4. With the above observation, appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA J.)