IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR C.A.F. NO.2144/2010 & 2145/2010 & 2146/2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.700 OF 2009 (RAMDAS GOVINDA WAGAD & ORS....VS.. PRAVEEN KUMAR LILAPAT BANSAL & ANR..) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. S.V. Sohoni, Advocate for Applicants. Mr. D.G.Paunikar, Advocate for Respondents No.1 & 2. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 17, 2010. Heard the learned counsel for the applicants. The learned counsel for the respondents opposes the prayer made in the civil application. However, for the reasons stated in the Civil Application Nos.2144 of 2006 and 2145 of 2006 the delay in filing the application for bringing the legal representatives on record is condoned and the abatement, if any, is set aside. All the three civil applications are allowed and disposed of. The necessary amendment may be carried out within a period of two weeks. C.A.F.NO. 1967/2010. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The learned counsel for the respondents states that almost entire consideration is paid to the appellants and therefore, it is necessary to execute the sale deed in favour of the respondents/ plaintiffs. However, since the first appeal is admitted and the issues of both facts and law can be argued in the first appeal, it would be necessary to stay the effect and operation of the judgment passed by the trial Court during the pendency of the first appeal. However, it would be necessary for the appellants to furnish solvent surety/ security to the tune of Rs.4,00,000/- to the satisfaction of the trial Court. The judgment and decree passed by the trial Court is stayed on the aforesaid condition. The solvent surety/ security should be furnished within a period of two months. The Civil Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and disposed of. JUDGE RR.