IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc-No. M-30164 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: 05 December, 2011 Sunil @ Tolu & another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI Present: :-Mr. Chanderhas Yadav,, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Shalini Attri, DAG Haryana. M.M.S.BEDI , J . The petitioners have allegedly robbed sum of Rs.7000/-, and a mobile phone from the complainant at pistol point. Learned State counsel has argued that the petitioners are involved in 4-5 other criminal cases. It will be debatable during the trial whether the petitioners have been implicated falsely or they are actually involved in similar cases of theft, extortion, robbery/dacoity. Without expression of any opinion, on the mertis of the case, it is sufficient to observe that there is a delay of eight days in lodging of FIR and the petitioners have been in custody since 17.6.2011, they can be granted concession of bail. The petition is allowed. The petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on their furnishing personal bond for sum of Rs.30,000/- with one surety each to the satisfaction of the trial Court. 05.12.2011 (M.M.S. BEDI) aarti JUDGE