IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6816 of 2010 1. RANJO DEVI 2. Sandha Kumari Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 12.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that informant’s daughter was married with one Jayanto Das, developed relation with his younger brother rather married also and came to her parents’ house where there was some negotiation and informant was given Rs. 20,000/- for remarrying his daughter but all the family members including these petitioners, who happen to be the mother-in-law and Nandad are also made accused apprehending their arrest which in my view also cannot be justified. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Balrampur P.S. Case No. 58 of 2009, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Katihar subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)