IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1587 of 2011 RAGHUBANSH MANI @ RAGHUBANSH SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.02.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Maner P.S. Case No. 116 of 2003 registered under Sections 302,201 and 34 of the I.P.C. The case was instituted in 2003 whereas charge sheet was submitted in 2008 on that ground alone, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. However, from perusal of the order sheet, it appears that there is only circumstantial nature of evidence against the petitioner. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was working in Delhi as a result of which he was not aware about the case. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner without being prejudiced by the order of this court considering the fact - 2 - that only circumstantial nature of evidence is available against the petitioner, if possible, dispose off the application on the same day if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within a period of four weeks from today. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)