IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 26534 of 2007 Between: M.Vijay Kumar S/o.M.Lakshminarsaiah Resident of H.No.11-3-292/2/C Srinivas Nagar,Padmaraonagar, Secunderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House officer, /Circle Inspector of Police (Mr,.Anjiah), P.S.Neredpet, Nredmet, Cyberabad 2 The Deputy Commisisoner of Police, cyberabad Zone Cyberabad 3 The Commissioner of Police, Basheerbagh Hyderabad 4 Smt.Nayeemunnisa Begum W/o.Nazir Ahmed khan Resident of Flat No.12, Block No.I,Krupa complex Neredmet, Malkajgiri, R.R.District 5 Naseer Ahmed Khan S/o.Nazir Ahmed khan Resident of Flat No.12, Block No.I,Krupa complex Neredmet, Malkajgiri, R.R.District 6 Shabbire Ahmed khan S/o.Nazir Ahmed khan Resident of Flat No.12, Block No.I,Krupa complex Neredmet, Malkajgiri, R.R.District 7 Ayub Ahmed khan S/o.Nazir Ahmed khan Resident of Flat No.12, Block No.I,Krupa complex Neredmet, Malkajgiri, R.R.District 8 Asraf Ahmed khan S/o.Nazir Ahmed khan Resident of Flat No.12, Block No.I,Krupa complex Neredmet, Malkajgiri, R.R.District .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MOHAMMED IMRAN KHAN Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.1 in calling the petitioner to the Police Stations of Neredmet, Cyberabad and Malkajgiri, Ranga Reddy District as illegal and arbitrary. Heard Sri Mohammed Imran Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home and perused the record. From the facts narrated by the learned counsel and as could be seen from the record, the civil disputes persist between the petitioner on the one side and respondent Nos.4 to 8 on the other in respect of a property said to have been sold by the husband of respondent No.4 and father of respondent Nos.6 to 8 to the petitioner. O.S.No.2877 of 2006 filed by the petitioner against respondent Nos.4 to 8 is pending and injunction has been granted in his favour by the competent Court of civil jurisdiction. On the complaint given by respondent Nos.4 and 5, Crime No.126 of 2007 was registered by respondent No.1 against the petitioner and he was arrested on 24.04.2007. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submitted that subsequently, a charge sheet has been filed and the case was taken on file by the jurisdictional Magistrate as C.C.No.447 of 2007. The learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the guise of pendency of the said criminal case, respondent No.1 had been summoning the petitioner to the Police Station and harassing him and that after filing of this writ petition, he stopped such harassment. In view of this submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of. Respondent No.1 is directed not to harass the petitioner by interfering with his personal liberty in the guise of the pendency of criminal case. He is, however, given liberty to follow the procedure under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in dealing with C.C.No.447 of 2007. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP.No.34611 of 2007 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 23rd APRIL, 2008 kvni