IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.55978 of 2007 UMESH KUMAR SINGH S/O SRI THAKUR PRASAD SINGH R/O VILL.SHERPUR, POLICE STATION-AKORHIGOLA, DIST. ROHTAS --- PETITIONER Versus STATE OF BIHAR ---- OPP. PARTY. ----------- 04 10.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State. Petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 08.10.99 passed by learned trial Judge in Tr. No. 1165 of 1998 whereby the application of the petitioner seeking discharge was considered and rejected. Learned trial Judge on a consideration of the materials found as follows:- “….. In any view, there is sufficient ground for framing charge against accused Umesh Kumar Singh for the offence U/s 414 I.P.C. Accordingly, prayer of petitioner accused Umesh Kumar Singh is hereby rejected and accused is directed to remain physically present before the Court on 19.11.99 for framing of charge against him.” Being aggrieved by the aforesaid order petitioner preferred criminal revision no. 371 of 1999 in the Court of Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. III, Rohtas Sasaram which remained pending for sometime. Ultimately learned revisional Court by order dated 04.10.2007 refused to interfere with the order. It may be stated here that learned revisional Court, in view of the materials placed on record, found and recorded its satisfaction that there is/are sufficient materials on the record justifying framing of charge. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to 2 demonstrate that the two impugned orders are perfunctory and/or patently illegal. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere with the orders impugned. The application is, accordingly, dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)