1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 2546 OF 2009 Muktabai W/o Govind Lokhande and others Versus The State of Maharashtra. *** Mr. N. L. Jadhav, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. P. M. Shinde, A. P. P. for the Respondent/ State. *** 1. Heard learned counsel. The application for Applicant No.2 Govind and Applicant No.3 Prakash is not pressed. Counsel urged, Muktabai, the mother-in- law of the deceased is attributed with limited role of pushing the victim/ deceased and facilitating homicidal death. Counsel informs, the other two ladies Savita and Meenabai, placed in similarly situated facts, are released on bail. 2. The role attributed to Muktabai is specific and not a case of a general character. Her age by itself will not be a boon for her to seek bail, at this stage. Consequently, the application is rejected. However, since the accused are in custody from March,2009 and I am informed there are few custody matters with the learned Additional Sessions Judge, the learned Judge will give priority to this matter, to ensure its disposal within eight months from receiving the order. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:10/08/2009. ans/2546