1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 4512 of 2008 IN Criminal Appeal No. 858 of 2008 [State of Mah. Vs. P.P. Apotikar & ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. S.S. Doifode, APP for appellant. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND R.C. CHAVAN, JJ. DATE : 3rd February, 2009. 1. Heard learned APP Mr. Doifode for the appellant. 2. Learned Sessions Judge acquitted the accused of charge under Sections 302, 323 and 504 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code. 3. Apart from many circumstances, what seemed to have impressed the Trial Judge very much, are the circumstances, namely :- [a] major injuries on the person of one of the accused were not explained; [b] there are major contradictions in the statements of witnesses, and [c] there was a fight in two groups, 4. The conclusions reached by the learned Sessions Judge are not just probable, but most probable conclusions. Thus, we see no grounds to conclude that the Judgment is a product of erroneous consideration of evidence or 2 perversity. 5. In the circumstances, no interference is called for. Leave is refused. Judge Judge |Hedau| 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Criminal Appeal No. 858 of 2008 [State of Mah. Vs. P.P. Apotikar & ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. S.S. Doifode, APP for appellant. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND R.C. CHAVAN, JJ. DATE : 3rd February, 2009. Appeal is dismissed. Judge Judge |Hedau|