@ 6%?6?” SINGLE BENCH IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmTISGARH AT BILASPUR (c.G.) WRIT PETITION (S) No. &o?0 OF 2010 \/ PETITIONERS : 1. Budhan Ram Paikra Son of Late ‘ : Shri Kenda Ram Paikra, aged about 55 years, Resident of Patelpara, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). 2. Bala Prasad Ahirwar Son of Shri 1 Mattulai Anirwar, ageda bout 54 years, Resident of North Ringh Road, Kedarpur, Near Arun Sangeet Vidyalaya, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). 3. Shankar Lal Verma Son of Late Shri Shyam Ratan Verma, aged about 50 years, Resident of Mahuapara, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). / VERSUS RESI30NDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the Secretary, Water Resources Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). / 2. The Chief Engineer, Mahanadi Project, Water Resources i I Department, Raipur (C.G.). / \ ’ 3. ,The Executive \ Engineer, Electricai/Mechanical, \ Heavy Machinery Division, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.). { 1 / The Superintending . Electrical/M chani‘cal, WRIT: PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF INDIA T Engine’er, Heavy THE CONSTITUTION OF I @g Machinery Division, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.i . i HGH I COURT OF CHHAI TTS ARH IASPU LR Wnt Petttton (S) No 220 of 20 ljo V Petitioners r V ' Budhan Ram VP l & others Respondents State of Chhattisg h 8r. others - Versus , ‘ * (Wnt P61111011 under Art1cle 226 of the Constt non of Indla) (SB Hon’ble Shn Satlsh K Agmhotn J ) Shri V. :K. Pandey, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri P. iK. Bhaduri, PanelvLawyer for the State] respondents. 0 R D E R (oral) ( Passed oh ans 15th day of Mm]: 2o1o ) Heaid. e 1. Learned counsel appeanng for the pehuoner on mstructlons subnnts that the petltloner seeks per-rmss1on of fins Court to w1thdraw the wnt pehtlon i t , , ' 2. ‘ Learned counsel appearmg for the respondents has no . objection. I 3; In View of the above the writ ‘ petition is dismissed as l mthdrawn No order asto costs V‘ 3v»; ' ' AL : ._ l _ l \ WV“ / i // Sdl- AGNm0TB} SATISH K.‘ Judge W/W’AM’W