IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 9TH APRIL 2010 / 19TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 11860 of 2010(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.V.DINESAN, AGED 41 YEARS, SON OF K.V.KANNAN, SENIOR ASSISTANT GRADE-I, KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD., KANHANGAD TALUK DEPOT, KANHANGAD, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA SRI.ANEESH JOSEPH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD., MAVELI BHAVAN, GANDHI NAGAR, KOCHI-682 020. 2. THE ADDITIONAL GENERAL MANAGER (P&A), KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD., MAVELI BHAVAN,GANDHI NAGAR, KOCHI-682 020. 3. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD., KOZHIKODE. 4. THE ASSISTANT MANAGER-IN-CHARGE, KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD., KANHANGAD TALUK DEPOT, KANHANGA, KASARAGOD DIST. ADV. SRI.LAKSHMI NARAYAN, SC, SUPPLYCO FOR R. SMT.MOLY JACOB, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 11860 of 2010 F ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 9th day of April, 2010 J U D G M E N T This writ petition has been filed challenging Ext.P2 order of transfer dated 29-03-2010. According to the petitioner, he has now been ordered to be transferred to a place which is 300 Kms away from his native place. According to him, the respondents have ignored the fact that he came to the present station only on 14-08-2008. Normally a person would be allowed to stay at a particular station, on transfer and posting, for a period of three years. He has certain personal grievances as well. The learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that disciplinary proceedings are contemplated against the petitioner. When faced with such a situation, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is prepared to approach the authorities with a representation requesting them to reconsider the issue. Therefore, without making any observation as to the merits of the contentions, this writ petition is disposed of with WPC.11860/2010 : 2 : liberty to the petitioner to approach the 3rd respondent by filing a representation raising grievances against Ext.P2 order of transfer. In case such a representation is received within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, the 3rd respondent shall consider and pass orders thereon expeditiously, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of the representation. Since the petitioner has not so far been relieved pursuant to Ext.P2 order, he shall be permitted to continue in the present station till a decision is taken on such representation. Sd/- (C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge