SM 1 24.ao.1137.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1137 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1513 OF 2011 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1137 OF 2011 Gopukumar Bhaskar Pillai ....Appellant. Versus The Municipal Commissioner and another ....Respondents. ____________ Mr. Y. R. Dube for the Appellant. Ms. K. K. Soraan for the Respondent No.1-BMC. CORAM: R. M. BORDE, J. DATED : NOVEMBER 21, 2011. P.C.: It is the allegation that the stable is established by the plaintiff without valid license and the license which was secured by the original owner has expired and he has presented the Suit No. 738 of 2011 in respect of the stable premises in the High Court and the same is pending. There is no order passed by this court in the pending suit. 2. In this view of the matter, the Trial Court was justified in turning down the application tendered by the appellant. No case is made out for causing interference in the order passed by the Trial Court refusing to grant ad-interim relief. 3. Appeal from order is devoid of substance and disposed of. However, the Trial Court is directed to decide the pending Notice of Motion in the L. C. Suit No. 1611 of 2011 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 16 weeks SM 2 24.ao.1137.11 from today. 4. In view of disposal of the Appeal from Order, pending Civil Application does not survive and the same stands disposed of. The respondent-Municipal Corporation is permitted to file written statement, say, documents etc. (R. M. BORDE, J.)