IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11855 of 2009 1. CHOTE LAL SINGH, SON OF SURAHU SINGH YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAMAULI, POST OFFICE BADHAUNA, POLICE STATION CHAINPUR, DISTRICT KAIMUR AT BHABHUA. 2. ASAGAR ANSARI SON OF MD. ISHAQUE ANSARI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARPALIYA, POST OFFICE BALUA, POLICE STATION GUTHANI, DISTRICT SIWAN. 3. UMESH KUMAR YADAV, SON OF INDRADEV YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE + POST OFFICE DHAMAR, POLICE STATION ARA, MUFFASIL, DISTRICT BHOJPUR---PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME(POLICE). 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR MILITARY POLICE, PATNA, BIHAR. 3. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR MILITARY POLICE(CENTRAL BOARD, PATNA.), BIHAR. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BUXAR-CUM-COMMANDANT, BIHAR MILITARY POLICE-IV, DUMRAON, BUXAR, BIHAR----RESPONDENTS. For the Petitioners : M/S Tej Bahadur Singh, Sr. Adv. Gyan Shankar, Brajesh Kumar, Advocates. For the State : Mr. AC to GA-I. ----------- 02. 10.09.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners were the applicants for the post of Constable in the Bihar Military Police pursuant to advertisement issued in the newspaper. They appeared in the physical selection test and were empanelled for appointment on the post of Constable, however, when they went to submit their joining they were again measured at the instance of the Superintendent of Police, Buxar-cum-Commandant, Bihar Military Pollice-IV, Dumraon, Buxar and were asked not to join the post as their chest were found less than the yardstick fixed for such appointment. Against the measurement made at Buxar, petitioner no.1 moved before the D.I.G., Bihar Military Police, Central Range, Patna, who got petitioner no.1 again measured and being satisfied that his chest measurement is as per the yardstick fixed for appointment on the post of Constable directed the Superintendent of Police, Buxar-cum- Commandant, Bihar Military Pollice-IV, Dumraon, Buxar to consider - 2 - the case of petitioner no.1 for such appointment. Even after issue of the order of the D.I.G., Bihar Military Police, Central Range, Patna bearing Memo No. 169 dated 19.6.2008, Annexure-5 the case of petitioner no.1 has not been considered for such appointment. 3. So far petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are concerned, they have also approached D.I.G., Bihar Military Police, Central Range, Patna for similar relief vide representation, reference whereof is given in Paragraph-24 of the writ application but copy thereof has not been annexed with the writ application. 4. Accordingly, this court directs petitioner nos. 2 and 3 to file fresh copy of their representation before the D.I.G., Bihar Military Police, Central Range, Patna along with a copy of this order, who should consider the same in accordance with law. So far petitioner no.1 is concerned, in whose favour the D.I.G., Bihar Military Police, Central Range, Patna has already passed order bearing Memo No. 169 dated 19.6.2008, Annexure-5, the D.I.G., Bihar Military Police, Central Range, Patna should ensure compliance of his own order as early as possible, in any case within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. He should also dispose of the representation of petitioner nos. 2 and 3 within the same time. 5. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)