IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39647 of 2009 BIRENDRA KUMAR MISHRA @ LALAN KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.39667 of 2009 BIRENDRA KUMAR MISHRA @ LALAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 22.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant. The defence in a complaint case under section 420 of the penal code is that a final report of a civil dispute was submitted in a police case whereafter the present protest-cum-complaint case has followed. The complainant states that he wants his money back. The agreement for sale reflects that possession was given to the complainant first whereafter on his failure to fulfil the conditions of the agreement for sale the petitioners subsequently sold it to another. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named, surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/-(twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Khagaria in connection with Complaint Case No. 1532© of 2008/900© of 2008. Shageer (Navin Sinha, J)