1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Contempt Petition No. 87/2010 IN C.R.A. NO. 48/2009 (Kisan Tansuji Meshram VERSUS Ritesh Kisanji Meshram & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.A. Bari, counsel for the petitioner. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : APRIL 27, 2010 . Heard. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have deliberately flouted the orders passed by this Court on 16.02.2010 in Civil Revision Application No.48/2009 by which the respondents were directed not to disturb the possession of the petitioner during the pendency of the civil revision application. The only grievance made by the petitioner is that the petitioner is not permitted to use the internal staircase and in stead the respondents have installed the staircase from outside the suit premises and it is not possible for the petitioner to use the staircase from outside as he is an old man. The alleged actions of the respondents, if any, do not show that there is disobedience of the order passed by 2 this Court on 16.02.2010. In case, the petitioner was aggrieved by the installation of the staircase from outside the premises, the petitioner could have moved the Court in Civil Revision Application No.48/2009 for seeking necessary orders in stead of filing this contempt petition. In the aforesaid circumstances, the contempt petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. JUDGE APTE