1/2 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7896/2009 (Ghodawat Industries (India)Pvt.Ltd. vs. M/s B.M.Joshi &ors.) DATE OF ORDER : 11/9/2009 HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr.M.Mridul, ] Mr.R.R.Nagori, ] for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel. The only grievance in this writ petition is that by the impugned order dated 26/5/2009 the learned trial court had directed that counsels may address the arguments on all the three applications filed by the parties namely, application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, application under Section 10 CPC and application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. The matter was fixed for such arguments on 14/7/2009. Learned counsel informs that such applications have not been decided and the matter is now fixed on 18/9/2009. From the bare perusal of the impugned order, it cannot be inferred that which application would be decided by the learned trial court first. The learned trial court has only stated the reason in the impugned order that since all the applications which have been filed by the defendant petitioner and they are pending, the arguments on all 2/2 the three applications may be addressed at the same time. In what sequence the applications would be decided is not yet known to the Court, therefore, in the opinion of this Court it would be premature to entertain this writ petition and set a frame for decision by the learned trial court on these three applications. Upon such decision, if any party is aggrieved of that order, it goes without saying that the party can take appropriate remedy against that order. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as premature. Copy of this order be sent to opposite parties & learned trial court immediately. (DR.VINEET KOTHARI),J . item no.4 baweja/-