IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR MONDAY, THE 18TH JULY 2011 / 27TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 19325 of 2011(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- REJI KUMAR.P., LASCAR GRADE-II, GOVERNMENT CENTRAL PRESS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J. SMT.POOJA SURENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PRINTING, GOVERNMENT CENTRAL PRESS,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 4. THE DISTRICT OFFICER, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, DISTRICT OFFICE, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SMT. SMITHA SUKUMAR, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 19325 of 2011(M) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: EXT.P1 : True copy of the ranked list for appointment to the post of Lascar Gr-II published by the PSC EXT.P2 : True copy of the appointment chart down-loaded by the petitioner from the Website of the PSC EXT.P3 : True copy of the Advice letter dated 22.9.2010 issued to the petitioner by the PSC EXT.P4 : True copy of the appointment order dt. 13.10.2010 issued by the 2nd respondent. EXT.P5 : True copy of the Show Cause notice dated 29.6.2011 issued to the petitioner by the 4th respondent. EXT.P6 : True copy of the amendment issued by the Government as per Notification dated 3.8.2010 EXT.P7 : True copy of the representation filed by the petitioner before the 4th respondent requesting for extension of time. EXT.P8 : True copy of the application dated 12.7.2011 filed by the petitioner under R.I. Act before the 4th respondent. RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: Nil //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE jma C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No. 19325 OF 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 18th day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T This writ petition has been filed challenging Ext.P5 whereby the advice of the petitioner as Lascar Grade II made as per Ext.P3 was sought to be cancelled on the ground that it was issued by mistake. As per Ext.P5 the petitioner was given 15 days' time to show cause as to why the said provisional decision should not be made absolute. The contention of the petitioner is that unless the petitioner is served with a copy of the revised advise list and appointment chart made by the respondents 3 and 4, he would not be in a position to file an effective reply to Ext.P5. When this mater is taken up for consideration today, the learned standing counsel for the respondents submitted that the details regarding the above mentioned aspects necessary to enable the petitioner to give an effective reply to Ext.P5 would be given to the petitioner. Consequently, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to make available such details and also to grant the petitioner seven days' time for filing a reply to Ext.P5 from the date of communicating such details to him. Sd/- (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge