S^l:'"ut..r ;.°"..? C1 'T IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO..^Yi^i..../2010 PETITIONERS ^;^^ 'Nyv'^v ^w .i^y ^"- -,,r:: /ey^, ^~^ f ®TS.B./XS<Ai« ^Af^/ £>%:/ 3. /' 4. Mithlesh Sahu, son of Late Gulapi Ram Sahu, aged about 23 years, working as a Shiksha Karmi, Grade-III, Naveen Primary School, Gudguda, R/o. village Kuhkuha, Post Dahdaha, Janpad Panchayat Kurud, District Dhamtari (C.G.), Leena Chandrakar, Daughter of late Koushal Kumar Chandrakar, aged about 24 years, working as a Shiksha Karmi, Grade-III, Naveen Primaiy School, Amapara,, Kamroud, R/o. village & Post Dahdaha, Blcok Kurud, District Dhamtari (C.G.), Pawan Kumar Sahu, son of late Dayalu Ram Sahu, aged about 40 years, working as a Shiksha Karmi, Grade-III, Naveen Primaiy School, Parkhanda, R/o. village and Post Katalbod, Tahsil Kurud, District Dhamtari (C.G.), Hemant Kumar Banjare, son of late Ganga Prasad Banjare, aged about 28 years, working as a Shiksha Karmi, Grade-III, Primary School, Mura, R/o. (9 /^^^., /^>~<^' /Gir/-..^-7N,% I!!- I V, «1s. ^. village Abhanpur Basti, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.), /5. Smt. Kiran Kanwar, wife of Late M.K. Kanwar, aged about 46 years, working as a Shiksha Karrai, Grade-III, Primary School, Purani Basti Parkhanda, R/o. village Navagaon, Post Parkhanda, Tahsil Kurud, District - Dhamtari (C.G.), •' 6. Duj Bai Kanwar, wife of Mahettar Ram Kanwar, aged about 36 years, working as a Shiksha Karmi, Grade-III, Primary School, Purani Basti Parkhanda, R/o. village Navagaon, Post Parkhanda, Tahsil Kurud, District - Dhamtari (C.G.), / 7. Manoj Kumar Dhruv, son of late Veer Singh Dhruv, aged about 36 years, working as a Shiksha Karn-ii, Grade-II.I, Primary School, Tikarapara Jijamgaon, R/o. village Bhotha, Post Karelibadi, Tahsil Kurud, District - Dhamtari (C.G.), 8. Bal Mukund Sahu, son of late Tanik Ram Sahu, aged about 33 years, working as a Shiksha Karmi, Grade-III, Primaiy School, Pashchim Para, Pachpedi, Block Kurud, R/o. village Post RESPONDENTS fy^\ ^ Bhakhara, Tahsil - Kurud, District - Dhamtari (C.G.) /9. Dipesh Kumar Sahu, son of late Rang Sai Sahu, aged about 38 years, working as a Shiksha Karrai, Grade-III, Primary School, Paraswani, R/o. village SE Dahdaha, Tahsil Kurud, District Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS /l. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through -the Principal Secretary, Department of General Administration, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^/2. The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). /3. District Education Officer, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) / 4. The Collector, Dhamtari, District - Dhamtari (C.G.) / 5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Kurud, District - Dhamtari (C.G.), WRITPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA. in^ ^.-"'^. '\ S SteSi;;.. 1 '•lasae'^ s ..r~'^:J: ^^.^HG-7^ .'/;<?~J an^?l w Ri-fi'* (TSTT •3Fn^T'^tt^ 'Svf ^i<4]y4|^ ®ti|y'i<o,iq<niyy _...Lrf..&..2..l(.3.Aj.;,o, 3(T^TTT5R5' (' ^RIIW ^lfCT CT^T SB: Hon'ble Shri Manlndra Mlohan Shrivastava, J 22.6.2010 Mr. R.S. Patel, counsel Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, P, Heard on I.A. No.l, ap^lication for modification of order dated 14.6.2010. Upon consideration, th^ dated 14.6.2010 is recalled anB The petitioners have fil^( are wards of Assistant Teachei an application for compassio^iate given appointment on the petitioners submitted that Assistant Teacher according tcj Learned State counsell petitioners may be given representation before £he be considered on its own merill Having considered and merits of the case, in the served, if a direction is giveit representation raising the4 q»T^[(rl4il ^!i4^1 Tf (s^ ^Tal'^K ^sffinsn^r br the petitioners. nel Lawyer for the State. application (I.A.No.l) is allowed. Order following order is passed. {d this petition on the ground that they |-s who died while in service. They moved appointment and they have been of Shiksha Karmi Grade III. The tjhey are entitled to be appointed as the policy. ^ost submitted that for the present, the 4n opportunity of iiling the detailed com^ietent respondent authority, which may ,, in accordance with law. |without expressing any opinion on the opirfion of this Court, ends of justice will be to the petitioners to make a detailed grievances before the cofflpetent /^'' r" :<»?'XI-B6—; '3~5T '*IWW-i,, »tlly'IS, f°<diy^< 3tI^T IT^T ('j°l(-l«<<1Et) aTl^l'^TfrlN? '^sn sn^r ^Hic^ WifTWtritc! 311^1 -z- Praveen respondent authority along w within sfa; weeks fromtoday, the competent respondent au merits in accordance with lav period of four months from tl' any grievance still remains, available under the law. With the aforesaid obsei jth a copy of the petition and this order, |and on such representation being filed, |:hority shall decide the same on its own as early as possible preferably within a ije date of receipt of the representation. If the petidoners may avail the remedy [|vation, this petition stands disposed off. Certified copy as per rulj <=h1^^*41^ ^IHCTT tf f^St' <.^q^R ^sfRRsn^i ;s. Sd/- & Manindra Mohan Shrwastava Judge