1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1741 OF 2009 Netaji Sakharam Divse .. Applicant. Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr.Vishwanath Talkute for the applicant. Mr.J.P.Yagnik A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2009. DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2009. DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2009. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.6 of 2009 of Sangola police station. The said crime has been registered against the applicant for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 376, 341 of IPC. 3. It appears that the present applicant was a landlord of the premises, which was let out to the prosecutrix for running her beauty parlour. The prosecutrix is 36 years old. From the FIR it appears that the applicant and the prosecutrix, knew each other very well and they enjoyed sex on several occasions since 2006. According to the prosecutrix, 2 2 2 the applicant had promised to marry her. The manner in which the alleged offence has taken place, and as narrated by the prosecutrix in the FIR, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Hence the following order: . The applicant be released on bail in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount subject to the condition that the applicant shall report to the concerned police station on every Saturday between 10 am and 11 am till conclusion of the trial. The application is disposed of. . While passing this order I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)