IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 4TH APRIL 2008 / 15TH CHAITHRA 1930 Crl.MC.No. 1493 of 2008 ------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 16/11/2007 IN MC 50/2007 IN CC.555/2006 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I, CHENGANNUR .................... PETITIONER: COUNTER PETITIONER IN MC: ------------------------------------- 1. SANKARA PILLAI K.R., MANIMANDIRAM, THRIPPERUNTHURA, CHENNITHALA, MANNAR, CHENGANNUR TALUK. 2. SASIKUMAR P.R., PATTARUDATHU HOUSE, KURATTISSERY, MANNAR, CHENGANNUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.AJITH MURALI RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER IN MC: ------------------------------ STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR. M.S. BREEZE THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 4-4-2008 ,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Crl.M.C.No. 1493 of 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 4th day of April, 2008 ORDER The petitioners, who are the sureties of the accused in C.C.No.555/2006 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Chengannur, challenge the final order dated 16-11-2007 in M.C.No.50/2007 passed under Section 446 Cr.P.C. and the consequential proceedings for realisation of the penalty. 2. The remedy of the petitioners is to file an appeal under Section 449 Cr.P.C. before the appropriate court. Reserving the said right of the petitioners, this Crl.M.C.is dismissed. In case, there is delay in filing the said appeal, I am sure that the learned Sessions Judge shall be indulgent in condoning the delay in filing the appeal. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE ks.