IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 25893 of 2007 Between: Pothula Venkataramana, S/o Sambaiah, Voolapalli Village, Biccavolu Mandal, E.G.District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Station House Officer, Peddapudi Police Station, Peddapudi Village, Peddapudi Mandal, East Godavari District. 2 Superintendent of Police, Kakinada, East Godavari. 3 The Commissioner of Police, Home Department, Hyderabad. 4 S.Narayana Rao, S/o Sanyasi Rao, R/o Vollapalli Village, Biccavolu Mandal, East Godavari District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MRS.K.SANTISRI Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for Respondent No.4: ------ The Court made the following : ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue a writ, order or direction, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to direct the 1st respondent not to interfere into petitioner's life, personal liberty without any basis in the absence of any criminal proceeding or without any search warrant in due process of law and to pass such other appropriate order or orders in the circumstances of the case.” At the hearing, Smt.K.Santhisree, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration and therefore, the Writ Petition has become infructuous. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.33750 of 2007 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. _________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 3rd June, 2008 LUR