@ @ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA'ITISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WTIIT PETITION (Si NO. @S? I OF 2006 PETITIONER ' /Ramnath Sahu Son of Late Shri Jeetram Sahu, aged about 60 years, Resident of Village Chipli, Post Amali, Tahsil Nagri, District Dhamtari (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1 State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Public Works Department, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). e?“ The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Raipur (C.G.). The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Division Dhamtari (C.G.). The Sub Divisional Officer, Public Works Department, Sub Division Nagri, District Dhamtari (C.G.). WRIT PETITION, UNDER ARTICLE 2,2,6 OF THECONSTJIUTION DE INDIA, 1950 FOR ISSUANQE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS ETC. AND EOR APEROPRIATE ORDER/ORDERS, DIRECTIONZDIRECTIONS. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI$GARH AT BILASPUR W. P‘ (S) No. 7574 of 200$ Petitioner- : Ramm‘rh Sahu Verws Respondenfs : S‘fa‘re of ChhoWsgm-h and ofhers SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice swish K. Agnihotri, J Mr. P.P. Snhu, Advocate for 111a pe‘m'ioner. Mr. Satish Gupta, Deputy Government Advocate for the respondents/State. O R D E R (Passed on this 10*“ day of January, 2007) The following order of the Court is passed by Satish K. Agnihotri, J. 1. i earned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as learned Deputy Government Advocate appearing for the respondents/State jointly submit that the facts of the present case are similar to that of in Writ Petition 108 of 2005 .(Govind Vs. State of Chhattisgarh 6i others), which was allowed vide order dated 4*“ day of January, 2007. They further submit that the question of law involved is also the Same. 2. In view of the above stated submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order dated 4m day of January, 2007 passed by this Court in Writ Petition 108 of 2005. No order as to costs. Sd/— l l l Satish K.Agniixo&ri l i Judge l Boblu