THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.4630 of 2011 ORDER: Respondent No.4 constructed a complex of residential flats in Door No.19-16-91 in T.S.No.7, Ward No.30 of Bhimavaram. The petitioner purchased a flat, which is constructed in the stilt floor. Respondent No.5, which is the welfare association of the flat owners, raised an objection for construction of the flat in the stilt floor, which is earmarked for parking. Respondent Nos.1 to 3 initiated steps for demolition of the flat constructed in the stilt floor. A notice was issued on 24.01.2011 to the petitioner requiring him to stop the construction. The petitioner challenges the notice. It is urged that no objection was raised by respondent Nos.1 to 3 when respondent No.4 constructed the flat and once the petitioner has purchased it through a registered sale deed, it cannot be demolished at this stage. On behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3, a detailed counter- affidavit is filed. It is stated that respondent No.4 has constructed the flat in the stilt floor contrary to the sanctioned plan and that steps are being taken to remove the same. It is urged that time and again, the Hon’ble Supreme Court and this Court directed that no construction shall be permitted in the parking area. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3. It is not in dispute that the flat that was purchased by the petitioner is in the stilt floor. According to the sanctioned plan, the entire stilt floor was required to be earmarked for parking. There was no basis for the builder to construct the stilt floor. The mere fact that the petitioner purchased the same through a sale deed does not make any difference. This Court does not find any merits in the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt: 25.03.2011. Kdl