CWP No.11778 of 2010.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.11778 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 01.11.2010 **** Jagtar Singh . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. HS Saggu, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Addl. AG Punjab Mr. GS Saini, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 5 ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner was employed as Driver in the Mansa Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. on daily wages basis w.e.f. 6th October, 2006. He, having been relieved from the said assignment, has approached this Court. (2). The respondents, in their short-affidavit, have averred that out of two cash vans owned by the respondent- Bank, one has already outlived its utility and has become defunct whereas the other cash van is being driven by a regular Driver. The reply also suggests that the petitioner’s service have been dispensed with being CWP No.11778 of 2010.doc - 2 – no longer required and there was no complaint whatsoever against his work and conduct. (3). Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank fairly states that as and when any Driver would be required, the petitioner’s claim for re-employment shall be considered sympathetically and on priority basis. (4). In this view of the matter, no further direction is required to be issued in this petition, which is disposed of accordingly. (5). Dasti . (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 01.11.2010 vishal shonkar