IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.19164 of 2006 Between: Gullapalli Ramesh S/o. Late Venkataratnam R/o. 7-196, New Ragavendra Colony, Nacharam, Uppal, R.R. District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Station House Officer, Nacharam Police Station, R.R. District. 2 Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 3 Director General of Police A.P. Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR. P.RAJGOPAL REDDY FOR MR.B.VEERABHADRA RAO Counsel for the Respondents:AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is prayed that the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction or writ, essentially in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to conduct an impartial enquiry in to crime No. 167 of 2006 on file of the 1Respondent by any other officer or officers from any other police station by altering the sections according to law.” Sri P.Rajgopal Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri B.Veerabhadra Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is therefore, dismissed as such. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.24116 of 2006 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 17th JUNE, 2009. kvni