IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 7TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 18TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 1673 of 2008(Y) ------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. SHINE JAMES, S/O JAMES K.S., KADAVIL HOUSE, FIRE STATION WEST ROAD, CHANGANACHERRY, NOW RESIDING AT PULIYANAM, ANGAMALY. 2. VEENA KURIAN, D/O P.I.KURIAKUTTY, PARAVALAPPIL HOUSE, CHAKKARAPARAMBU, PULIYANAM P.O., ANGAMALY. BY ADV. SRI.SIBY MATHEW, SRI.A.A.MOHAMMED NAZIR. RESPONDENT: ---------------------- THE MARRIAGE REGISTRAR/SUB REGISTRAR, SRO, ALUVA, PIN-683101. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. M.R. SABU. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/02/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.1673/2008-Y: J U D G M E N T In view of the interim order, no further orders are required in this Writ Petition. Writ Petition fails and is dismissed. 07/02/2008. SD/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. //TRUE COPY// prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).NO.299/2008 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of January, 2008 JUDGMENT As is seen from Ext.P2 order of the STAT, a direction was issued to grant concurrence for variation as sought for by the petitioner. It is seen that from Ext.P3 proceedings of the RTA that the RTA adjourned the proceedings for obtaining legal opinion for filing appeal against the judgment. It is beyond dispute that RTA is not an aggrieved party to have adopted this attitude. In any case, the decision to adjourn the proceedings was taken as early as on 18.7.2006 and even as on date no steps have been taken against Ext.P2 order of the STAT. In view of this, I direct the second respondent to grant concurrence as ordered by STAT in Ext.P2, at any rate, within 4 weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of. ANTONY DOMINIC vi JUDGE 2 JUDGE vi. 3