gjftjjll p ppsjft^ ^ i=- i<yv INTHE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S) No. K 1200Sf PETITIONER ^.1 /f^%c. ^e"^-" ./A'^""'t< " J''v ,^'fy~b-->" RESPONDENTS >— ^u'1 ^^^ ^-^^^ ^:^^^ t^G. Dwij Ram Dhruw, S/o. Shri Sukul Ram Dhruw, Aged about 38 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School - Birjhuli, Block - Magarload, Distt- Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS / 1. State of Chhattisgarh & Others Through- The Secretary, Department ofTribal Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur 3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Distt. - Dhamtari (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Block - Magarload, Distt- Dhamtari (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT. WRITS. DIRECTION ETC TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. 1. Particulars of the petition : As per cause title ^^ ^- HLOH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SINGLEBENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. Petitioner ResDondents Petitioner Respondents PefiBoner Petitioner Resoondents Petitioner Respondents WRIT PETITIONfS.) N0.97 OF 2007 Jeewan Lal Sinha versus State of ChhatBsgarh and othere wrar pETmoN <s.i NO. 98 OF 2007 Chandrahas Shandil^i versus State ofChhatti^arh and othere WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.107 OF 2007 Mani Ram Sidar vereus Respondents : State of ChhatBsgarh and othere WRIT PETITION fS.} N0.108 OF 2007 Ram LalJagat versus State of ChhatGsgarh and othere And WRIT PETITICTI (S.) N0.109 OF 2007 Dwij Ram Dhruw versus State of Chhattisgarh and othere Present : Mr. A.S. Rajput, counsel for the petitimier(s). Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER (Passed on 16 Day of January, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the petiUoners as well as for Uie State/responctents jeinUy submit that the facts and question of law invohwd in the present bateh of writ petitions are squarely covered by the decision of this '\, ^J Court in the case of in the case of Yashwant Kumar BhafadwaJ vs. Mtir^cfpal Corporatton, Durg and another . 2. In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Vwma vs. Tfte Stete Govt of ChhaWsgaiti smd anothw) and dher connected mattere, decided by this Court on 15-12-2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Diploma in Education ExaminaCon, it was clarified that the nomenclature of the Basic Training InsUtute, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed and renamed as Diptoma in Educah'on, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, theD.Ed. Certificate hoklers are also covered bythe decisfon in Writ Petitfon (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (ffopesft Kumar Vwma vs. The State Govfc afChhaWsgarh and anathw) (Supra). 3. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petitions are disposed of in tenns of the decisfon of this Court in the matter of Yashwant Kwnar Bharackwaj (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitfonere have acquired B.Ed./B.T.tTD.Ed. Certificates at their own expenses as per the cireulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further whetherth^ have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to coste. 4. A copy of this order be placed on the record of the connected writ petitions. _ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge iubhash 1 2006(11) MPJR-CG 96