IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Application No. 567 of 2006 Rakesh and others …… Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and another …… Respondents …….. Mr. Vinod Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Nandan Arya, A.G.A. for the State. Mr. Lalit Belwal, Advocate for respondent no. 2. Hon’ble V.K. GUPTA, C. J. After hearing the detailed arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Assistant Government Advocate and the learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2, and upon going through the contents of the First Information Report, I feel totally disinclined to interfere in this matter in exercise of this Court’s jurisdiction u/s 482 Cr.P.C. The petition is dismissed. Interim order shall stand vacated. The bail application, if moved, shall be heard and disposed of very very expeditiously. (V. K. Gupta, C. J.) 25.07.2008 A