0407wp867.11.odt 1 THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.867 OF 2011 State of Mah. and anr. ..vs.. Ganesh Uttramrao Kakad. ............................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ............................................................................................................................................................... Smt.Bharti Dangre, Addl.Govt.Pleader for the petitioners. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATED : 4th July, 2011. The above petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India takes exception to the order dated 16/4/2010 by which order the revision application filed by the petitioners came to be rejected. There is a concurrent finding against the petitioners of both the Labour Court in Original Complaint ULP No.294 of 1993 and the Industrial Court in Revision ULP No.6 of 2009 as regards the respondent herein having worked for 240 days in the preceding years prior to the date of his alleged termination. The Labour Court on the basis of the material on record has recorded a finding of fact that the respondent had, in fact, completed 240 days of continuous service prior to the alleged date of termination. The Industrial Court in Revision did not find any reason to interfere with the said finding. The leaned Additional Government Pleader contended that the respondent was claiming that his services were terminated on 18/11/1988, however, the Labour Court 0407wp867.11.odt 2 has proceeded on the basis that his services were terminated on 24/11/1988, and if that be so the respondent has not completed 240 days of service. In my view, the said aspect would amount to taking a too technical view of the matter. Considering the finding recorded by both the courts below, no case for interdiction in the writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is made out. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed. JUDGE chute