C. R. 6177 of 2010 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : C. R. 6177 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : October 07, 2010 M/s Kay Bouvet Engineering Pvt. Ltd. and another .... Petitioners Vs. M/s J. C. Engineers Pvt. Ltd. .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. D. K. Singal, Advocate for the petitioners. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : C. M. No. 25913-C-II of 2010 and Main Case : Defendants have filed the instant revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging order dated 04.08.2010 (Annexure P-6) passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, thereby holding that the said Court has territorial jurisdiction to try the suit, which has been instituted by respondent-plaintiff against the petitioners. The petitioners have moved C. M. No. 25913-C-II of 2010 for placing on record copy of order dated 24.09.2010 (Annexure P-7) passed C. R. 6177 of 2010 (O&M) 2 by the trial court, whereby plaint has been rejected for non-payment of court fee. The petitioners have also prayed in the application that in view of said subsequent development, the instant revision petition be adjourned sine die, with liberty to the petitioners to revive the same if and when necessary. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the case file. Copy of order dated 24.09.2010 (Annexure P-7) is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. Since plaint has already been rejected, the instant revision petition, arising out of order passed by the trial court in the suit, has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the revision petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous, with liberty to the petitioners to revive the same, if and when necessary i.e. if the plaint is restored in appeal or revision. C. M. No. 25913-C-II of 2010 also stands disposed of accordingly. October 07, 2010 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE