i M..JRiEJII@i-QsuRT (>,F,,J,u.srcW,,B®,,,,^ ,m^,,AsPUX.€:--.C^G»J •r- W._P,MO. ^^3 /2QQ 4, »ES?ITIGNSR syw_msTS ..}' (^ ^>' ^ /w ,^ .' -^ / ./f l-l'J!' Chsadra Ehaa M^iileRg®soir».of 1 @te K at%i Das H rfiilsnge, ag@d at pr©s%it28 years® zesldent @£Kastaffb®Nagaff^ B&laspar (€&©<,)e _'^asus_ ,-'.s\j !• Sfeate of QahafetlsgaA <tti%ugfa t O^ief Sec^afeary^ Hom@ D@pareamt» D.K, Baav^i Raipar (aG.)o 2, QiseGtor GSi@£-al of P&lAce Hoae Bspafftaent^ B^Ke SaaVtfi Raipur (G,.G, )<. 3, .^Ape£infc@ad@it of fblloe Mlaspar (C.G.). |?aTT PETIT2GN l»<fEER &Rna£ 226''/22T:OF 'MS ^^I^TI@3_ .o-F^IHm.A^.SORISia^-W®_0?._APPa3PaE-.S3® - tSlT^ ^BITS, ORDER ^D DZSBGTION StQ^ -r^ HIGH COURT OP CHHAmSGARH AT BILA8PUR WritPetitionNo,849pf2QQ4 Petitioner Chandra Bhan Mahilaage Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & others SB; HonT^le Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Shri II. S. AhliiwaUa, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Sixit. Anjii Ahiija, Deputy Croverainent Advocate for the State/respondents. ORDER (28th August, 2006) 1. The petitioner, who was appointed as child co3istable on the death of his father late Shri Karam Das Mahilaage on 3.6.1986, completed 18tfa years of age on 7.3.1994. Ser^ice ofthe petitioner was termiaated on 7.3.1994. 2. The circular dated 1.4.2003 (Annexure R/2) provMes that child constable on coiapletion of 18th years of his age be considered for appomtraent on fhe p^st of constable subject to passiag of 10th class exaniination certificate. It was further provided that in the event child constable had not obtaiaed 10th class examiaation certificate he should not be renioved from service for two years enabliag the child constable to obtam 10th class exaaunation certificate. 3. Be that as it xaay, leai-ned counsel appearing for tiie petitioner submiits that in view of the fact tiiat fhe 4. petitioner has obtamed 10th class exRmination certificate in tbe year July, 2002, The petitioner be peniiitted to make a representation before the respondents/aufhorities for cousidering his case afresh, to which leamed counsel appearuig for the respondents/State has no objection. On such representation being filed by the petitioner, fhe respondente/autliorities may consider the saiae wifhm a period of eight weeks froin tlie date of receipt of the rRpresentation, in accordence with law, on its own inerit, For the reasons stated-above, the writ petition stands disposed of with the above stated liberty. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Bablu