IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 15TH DECEMBER 2011 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 33553 of 2011(T) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- A.M.ASHOK, AGED 46, S/O.A.T.MARKOSE, ATTUVELIL HOUSE, RAMAMANGALAM, MUVATTUPUZHA. BY ADVS. SRI.PRAMOD KOCHUTHOMMEN.E, SRI.PRASAD M.BABY, SRI.P.RAHUL. RESPONDENT/RESPONDENTS: --------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MOTOR VEHICLES DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, MUVATTUPUZHA- 686 661. 3. JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, KOTHAMANGALAM - 686 691. 4. ANIL THOMAS.A., AGED 48, ATTUVELIL HOUSE, ARAPPURA LANE, HOUSE NO.1, MUTTADA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN- 695 145. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. S. JAMAL. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).NO.33553/2011-T: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXHIBIT-P1. TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF HON'BLE COURT IN W.P. (C)NO.6928 OF 2011 DATED 29.3.2011. EXHIBIT-P2. TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF ORDER NO.S4/1205/2011/EK DATED 7.7.2011 PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P3. TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 19/9/2011 FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT-P4. TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 26.9.2011 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT COPY OF WHICH IS SERVED TO THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT-P5. TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT IN RESPECT OF KL-7 D 7627 IN FORM G. EXHIBIT-P6. TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE DEMAND DRAFT FOR AN AMOUNT OF RS.8640/- DATED 17/2/2011 TAKEN INFAVOUR OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DRAWN FROM UNION BANK OF INDIA, ORAMANA BRANCH BANK. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Prv. S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.33553 of 2011 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner challenges Ext.P2 order passed by the 3rd respondent under the Kerala Motor Vehicle Taxation Act. I am not inclined to entertain the challenge against Ext.P2 order, since the petitioner has an effective alternate remedy by way of appeal as provided under the Act itself. Therefore, without prejudice to that right, this writ petition is dismissed. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE acd