HIGH QGURT OF CHHATT’SGARH AT B§LASPUR WRIT PETI‘HON §S\ NO. 5924 of 2GQ6 Ramesh Kumer Sharma Son of Battu Prasad Sharma, aged about 49 years, Assismnt Teacher, Pr§mary Schooi, Samapur, Biack Kawardha, Distr'ict Kabirdham (0G) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : ’1. Siaie of Ch'natt‘isgarh, Through the Secretary, Department cf Scheo! Education, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur, District Raipur (0G) PETiTiONER 2. District Education Officer, Kabirdham (C.G.) 3. Biook Education O§f§cer, Kawardha, DisWct Kabirdham (C.G.) WRIT PETH’KEN UNDER AR'HCLE 226 OF THE CONSTiTUTiON OF ”\iDiA $§: §-§or.’bie 3hri $ati$h K. £gn§hotfz J. $hg’i {)eepak’Jam, Ativocaie :‘or the oet‘itioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Depuiy Advocate Genera! with Ms. Suniia Jain Panel Lawyey fey the Statefreepondeme. V, §RBER gORAL; {Passed on 25‘ day of June, 2mg) Heard. Learned counsel appeeg’ing fer ’ihe pe’tiiioner submhte that the pet§t§oner is entmed to grant of two moremente as he has obtamea DEd. ceriificate en his owrz expenses; durmg the service period. Learned counee! furthea' submits ‘thet the peiitioner may be ga’anteci liberty to make a representai’ion to ihe autheritiee fer giant of two increments pursuant io the judgment and order passed by this Couri in Yashwam‘ Kama!" Bharadwaj v. Municipai Cerporaz‘ion, Dwg and ~u%/ anomef and Gapes§? Kumar Verma vs. The Sz‘ate Govf. of Chhafz‘xfsgarh and amthef. The State Government is under an obHgaiixm to follow the iaw sewed by this Ceurt and it is not necessary to approach this Court by each and every empieyee when the law has aaready been sewed by we Ccurt. The empioyees, who are simiiahy shuated and have not approached the Court, may be treated at par with other empioyees, who have appmached this Couttv 1t is not necessary to approach this Ceurt for simitar order, tn View of the foregoing reasons, this petition stands disposed of with tiberty reserved to the petitioner, on the request of teamed counsel, to make‘a representation. it the representation is filed by the petitioner, the same may be considered and-decided, in accordance with law on its own merit as expeditiousiy as possible, preferably within a peri of eight weeks from the date of recipt of the reresentatn, subject e pio to verification of the facts. Sd/— atish K. Agnihotri Juge ' K‘JR (ll) MPJR CG E36 S) No.41 30 of 2805 1 2ooa 2 we r od r i S d