Q 'y^ ./^^^ IN THB_HIGH <^U&S_OF il?OI<^®imBAT^^^M ^. WilZI? PBTZTION N@« 3£t1 ©F2@©1 P^2TI©NTOI&BR ARS'IOLB 22€/^27 OF 1'HE ©©NS'IISFpTI^ 0P_IN^:A PETITtONEa » <yabar Sincib Son o£ Pawan Siiigh oond Sarpanah Grara fanehayate Berigfoat Resiaeiiae of Berighat a'elisil D^vbtaog, RSSPONDENt® » VS. ^l, \.^y ^?^ ^r^- Sfcate o£ aahattisgarb tforough Seorefeary, Panehayafe Departaaenfe I?.K«Btaawan» ftaipiir (<3»©») Addifcional Ul>per CSollector» Qariyaband» Oistrict: a.aipur(G»G») Sato-Mvisional @£fieer»©ariya- band^ Distriet &aipuF (G»©^) ant* M. Bagha w/o <T«P» Bagha R/@ Paaiga®Tehsil Devbhog District Itaipur. RetaFnin^ Offieer, Masinpitr . Vilcas Khand, Mainpur. PETZTION XJNDER ARTIGLB 226/^27 OP •EHE Q©NSTITUTI<m @F_.:INSI^. • ^' (^, XI-HC-22 3TI^T^T f^rt^^n^T ^ra'^cf ^n^ \Qp< ^ ^3[ r^Micrt^, ^^^(0, ft^Kl^ 3ll^l ^tft KINdlshNith /""W^ g@_S-^ f^rc^ ^TI^T ^<TT^K ^rf^cT 12.04.2005:- Ms. Sapna Kshatri, Adv4< Ahuja, learnQd counsel for tho pQ^itioner Shri K.N.Nandey, learned| Shri Yashwant Singh, teailned 2, 3 and 5. counsel for respondent No.4. G.A. for the State/respondent Nos. 1, The instant petition ha^) aggrieved by the order dated 2^ Collector, Garlyaband whereby) ajlowed and the order dated 27.{ has been set aside. Learned counsel for the to ©lectionpetition filed under the petition has become infructuo|Lis in view of the fact that terim view of the submjssion of copnsel dismissed as having become infrttctuous <=M<4?d41Ti ^i^<nT^tec^'<Ri^i< ^^if^T3:n^T cate appears on behalf of Shri Shailesh been filed by the petitioner as he is i.04.2001 passed by the Additional Upper the appeal of respondent No. 4 was 39.2000 passed by Sub Djvisional Officer >etitioner submits that the dispute relates ffanchayatraj Adhiniyam, 1993. However, of the Panchayat is already over and in for the petitioner, the petition is Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge (<ft^^^)