1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REV. APPLICATION NO. 13 OF 2005 CRIMINAL REV. APPLICATION NO. 13 OF 2005 CRIMINAL REV. APPLICATION NO. 13 OF 2005 Mrs. Nirmala Narayan Parab .. Applicant V/s. Uday K. Shirodkar & Anr. ..Respondents. ----- Miss. Leena Patil for the Applicant. Shri S.V.Marwadi for the Respondent No.1. Shri D.R.More, APP for Respondent No.2-State. ----- CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : MARCH 03, 2005 DATED : MARCH 03, 2005 DATED : MARCH 03, 2005 PC :- PC :- PC :- . This matter was argued for admission on 1st of February, 2005. I was not inclined to interfere on merits. Counsel for the applicant suggested that if notice is issued, some settlement can be worked out. That indulgence was shown. As per the notice, contesting respondents appeared and agreed for some arrangement, which was reduced to writing, singed by the respondent and son of the petitioner. As per that arrangement, the applicant was required to pay initial instalment of Rs. 50,000/- on or before 1st March, 2005. In that backdrop, the matter was deferred till today for orders. 2 . Today when the matter was called out, counsel for the applicant fairly states that she has not received any instructions about payment. Counsel for the respondent No.1, on instructions of his client, who is present in the court, states that no amount has been received so far. Hence, no further indulgence can be shown. Dismissed. . Ordered accordingly. .....