La*-'*f*;K^TditNill 11in»ii 1^1 .r<^01 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.I WRIT PETITION NQ.'S~4-24-/2005 PETITIONER ^ Kundan Prasad Chaturvedi, Son Of Shri Sudama PrasEid Ch^turvecli, aged | about 38 years, SHiksha Ka^mi Grade-3, Prirtiary School Karahniyai, Tahsil Marwahi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS I^SPONDENTS .^<--'/<. <^;!?^""" ,....<;K^O.'?" ^^^"" " y^..•••"' • ' ^9'00^ State of Chhgttisgarh, Through: Department of Maritralaya, D.K.S. Raipur (C.G.), The ^ Secretgj^, "€fi^j^f'y^ Bhawdii v^ /4. Janpad Panchayat Marwahi, Through: The Chief Executive Officer, Marwahi, District Bilaspur (C.G.). The Adciitional Collector, Priidi.i Road, District Bilaspur (C.G.). The District Education Offlcei, Educatipn District Bilaspur !(C.G.). /5. The Zila Panchayat Bilaspur, Through: The Chief Executive Qfficer, Zila Panchayat Bilaspur (C.S.). / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OFTHE CONSIZIIIDON .QF_INDIA. 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OFWRIT IN THE NATURE.Oh t;ERTIQRARI, MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPB1A1I ORDER/ORDERS.DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS. 1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 5428 of 2005 Petitioner Kundan Prasad Chaturvedi Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & ofhers (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri P. P. Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N. N. Roy, Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State. O R D ER loral) ( Passed on this 9th day of March, 2010 ) ^ 1. 2. 3. Heard. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in view of the averments made by the respondents/State in para 6 ofthe return filed in W.P. No. 5414/2005 (Vinod Kumar Rai Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others), the relief sought for in this writ petition has already been granted. Thus, nothing remains for adjudication. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents/State does not controvert the above submission rnade by leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order asto costs. „,, SatishK. Agnihotri Judge Thakur