IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated : Nainital the 14th June, 2011 Order on the bail application of accused Second Bail Application No.51 of 2011 CRIMINAL SIDE Amit S/o Ramesh Chand … Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand … Opposite Party Arising out of Case Crime No.42 of 2011 Under Sections 323/324/307/504/34 IPC P.S. Cantt. District Dehradun Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. R. P. Nautiyal, the learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. B. S. Parihar, the learned brief hodler for the State. The first bail application was rejected by an order dated 19th April, 2011. This is the second bail application. A perusal of the first information report indicates that the complainant’s daughter Pooja married the applicant Amit on her own freewill and that both were living together, but the applicant and three others including his mother came to the complainant’s house and some altercation took place whereupon a third party Inder Bahadur Thapa tried to intervene resulting injuries on his head. The first information report gives a general description of the incident and it does not specify the role assigned by each of the accused. The court finds that no cause of provocation was made upon Inder Bahadur Thapa, who intervened in the matter. There appears to be no previous amenity of the applicant with this person. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case coupled with the fact that there appears to be some matrimonial dispute and that two of the co-accused has been enlarged on bail, the court is of the opinion that the applicant is also entitled to be enlarged on bail. The bail application is allowed. Let the accused-applicant be released on bail in connection with Case Crime No.42/2011, police station Cantt. District Dehradun on executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 14.06.2011 LSR