IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 29TH JULY 2008 / 7TH SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 22885 of 2008(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ TISS J. JOY AGED 17 YEARS, D/O K.J.JOY, KOYIKKARA VEEDU, MARUTHORVATTOM P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA, (REPRESENTED BY THE FATHER, AS NEXT FRIEND). BY ADV. SRI.C.V.MANUVILSAN SMT.K.VIDYA SRI.JETTIN K.J. RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER FOR ENTRANCE, EXAMINATIONS, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR ENTRANCE EXAMS, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001. 2. DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, MEDICAL COLLEGE CAMPUS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No.22885 of 2008 ================== Dated this the 29th day of July, 2008 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a selected candidate for admission to professional degree courses this year in the quota set apart for persons with disabilities. The petitioner was required to register her option from 9.7.2008, online. The petitioner submits that because of some mistakes in the key given to her or some other technical fault, the petitioner could not register her option online although she tried to do the same. The petitioner is stated to have approached the 1st respondent who is stated to have assured the petitioner that the petitioner would be given admission in accordance with her position in the rank list. But now to the disappointment of the petitioner, she learns that she will not be given such admission on the ground that she has failed to register her option. In the above circumstances, the petitioner has filed Ext.P5 representation before the 1st respondent. The petitioner seeks a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 expeditiously. w.p.c.22885/08 2 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. 3. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, it is only appropriate that the 1st respondent considers the case of the petitioner on the basis of Ext.P5 as sympathetically as possible. This, the 1st respondent shall do within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. The allotment to be made in the meanwhile shall be subject to the orders to be passed on Ext.P5. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge