IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3163 of 2005 SIDHARTHA KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANOTHER ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. P. N. Pathak For the Respondent no. 1 : Mr. Amar Nath Deo, S.C.X & Mr. Ranjit Sinha, J.C. to S.C. X For Respondent no. 2 : Mrs. Nividita Nirvikar, G.P. XVI ------------ P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal ------------ Dated, the 23rd July, 2008. On 24th August, 2005 the writ petition filed by the petitioner came to be disposed of thus : “Since the process of framing rules have already started, the authorities should hasten to frame rules as early as possible. With the direction/observation aforesaid, this writ application is disposed of.” 2. Counsel for the petitioner does not dispute that subsequent to the aforesaid order of this Court, Rules have been framed. He, however, submits that some of these Rules suffer from un-constitutionality. If that be so, the petitioner may pursue appropriate remedy in challenging such Rules. That cannot be a ground for entertaining contempt application. 3. M. J.C. is dismissed accordingly. R. M. Lodha, CJ Kishore K. Mandal, J - 2 - AMIN/-