Criminal Misc. No.M-24372 of 2010 Ravi Kumar @ Rinku @ Ravinder Vs. State of Haryana * * * Present: Mr.Ranjan Lakhanpal Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.S.Mor, Sr.DAG, Haryana. * * * The present petition has been filed on behalf of Ravi Kumar @ Rinku @ Ravinder for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.228 dated 01.11.2009, under Sections 489-A. 489-B. 489-C and 489-D IPC, registered at Police Station Bilaspur, District Yamuna Nagar. Notice of motion was issued on 23.08.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the name of the petitioner does not figure in the FIR and only on the basis of disclosure statement made by co-accused, the petitioner has been implicated in the case. He further submits that the case of the petitioner is also at par with co-accused Surmukh Singh, who has already been granted bail by this Court and moreover, the case of the petitioner is at better footings than the case of co-accused Surmukh Singh. Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner is computer engineer and after disclosure statement made by co-accused, recovery of the amount of ` 34,800/- was effected from the petitioner and it is only the petitioner, who was master mind in the case. As per disclosure statement, the petitioner was involved in the preparation of the fake currency notes. He also submits that the case of the petitioner is not at par with co- accused-Surmukh Singh, who has been granted regular bail whereas, the case of the petitioner is at par with co-accused-Labh Singh, who is in custody. Earlier the petition filed by the petitioner for grant of regular bail was dismissed as withdrawn in March 2010. Learned State counsel Criminal Misc. No.M-24372 of 2010 ..2.. further submits that out of 14 witnesses, 12 have already been examined and the trial is in progress and the same is likely to conclude. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and after perusal of the contents of the FIR and other documents on record, I am of the opinion that since the recovery of the amount of ` 34,800/- was recovered from the petitioner on the basis of disclosure statement and he was found involved in preparation of fake currency notes and moreover, trial is also likely to conclude as out of 14 witnesses, 12 have already been examined, no case is made out to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The petition being devoid of any merit is dismissed. However, keeping in view the custody of the petitioner, trial court is directed to make all best efforts to record the statements of remaining two witnesses on the next date of hearing. Registry is directed to send the copy of the order to the trial court. (DAYA CHAUDHARY) December 14, 2010. JUDGE Seema-II