————“_ WRIT PETITION No. ’ Q QQ /2002 ’)‘ (i‘ / PETITIONERS .1. Ramesh Prasad, S/o Shri Laxman Rao, age ‘ . A I) S;at€ Of ‘ hhattisg$ v n ... ..‘..' ‘ "‘,‘;ZM Through : Collector - Durg (C.G.) 2. Upper— Collector, Durg (C.G.) M Tahsildar, Najul,Tahsil & Distt. — Durg (C.G.) ”f ? asant Rao, S/o Appaiya, R/o Street No. 54, .No. 21A, K.L.C., Zone - 2, Bhilai, ahsil & Distti- Durg (C.G.) ONTITUTION OF INDIA SEEKING A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI/ MANDUMUS PROHIBI- TION AND DIRECTION AND/OR ORDER. The petitioners named above begs to state as under :- DETAILS OF PETITION PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERE g- As given in. the cause title. . Mr / gm THE HIGH COUQT OF DICATU AT BILASPUR C.G r T r C about 30 years. Wm i I. . ‘ n5 j; 2. Anita Bai @ Anita Devi, W/o Ramesh Prasad, aged about 26 years. Both are R/o Durga Mandir, Behind Masjid, —. H Khursipar, Bhilai, Tahsil & Distt.- Durg (C.G.) VERSUS PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226L227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF NDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agg'h0g‘ J. Present: None Shri P.K.Bhaduri, for the yetitioner. Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No. 1 to 3. 0 R D E R (Passed on 23’3 day ofNovember, 20 1 1) 1. The matter is called for hearing twice. None apgears nor is , any representation made on behalf of me petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. 2. In View of the above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. Consequently, M(W)P No. 149I2002, stands dismissed. Sdl— . i Satish K Agm‘m Judge Ashok f; m HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR »\\ WRIT PETITION No. 686 of2002 PETITIONERS Ramesh Prasad & Another. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others.