IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN MONDAY, THE 10TH MARCH 2008 / 20TH PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 315 of 2008(K) ------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------ A.M.SALI, S/O.ABDUL RASSACK, FLAT NO.KP II/831, A.J.APPARTMENTS, KAZHAKUTTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.G.SUDHEER RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAZHAKUTTOM CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. ASUMA BEEVI @ ASMA BEEVI, D/O.ABDUL REHIMAN, FLAT IN IIND FLOOR, A.J.APPARTMENTS, KAZHAKUTTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT.PLEADER MR. SALIM P.A. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/03/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.C. NO. 315/2008 APENDIX: PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT AS OS NO. 744/2007 FILED BY THE PETITIONER AND HIS SISTERS BEFORE THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF HE ORDER IN IA NO. 3969/2007 IN OS NO. 744/2007 DATED 23-5-2007 III ADDL.MUNSIFF COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITED BYHE PETITIONER AND DHIS SISTERS BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 29-12-2007. EXT.P3(A): TRUE COPY OF POSTAL RECEIPT. ks. TRUE COPY P.S. TO JUDGE K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & P.N. RAVINDRAN, JJ. ======================= W.P.(C)NO. 315 of 2008 ======================== DATED THIS THE 10th DAY OF MARCH 2008 JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair,J. The petitioner has approached this Court alleging that police is harassing him at the instance of the 4th respondent, the second wife of the petitioner's brother. There is a civil dispute between them and the petitioner and others have instituted O.S.No.744/2007 before the Munsiff Court, Thiruvananthapuram against the 4th respondent and others. There is already an interim order in that suit, a copy of which is produced as EXt.P3. Now the police is unnecessarily interfering in the above civil dispute at the instance of the 4th respondent, it is submitted. 2. The learned Government pleader submitted that the petitioner's late brother had two wives. The said brother established two trusts which are being administered by the two wives of him. There is some dispute between them. Both parties WPC. 315/2008 -2- have filed repeated complaints before the superior police officers. They were forwarded to the third respondent. The third respondent called the parties to enquire into the matter and submitted report to the superior police officers. The learned Government Pleader also denies the allegation that the second respondent is harassing the petitioner. It is submitted on behalf of the third respondent that he has no intention whatsoever to harass him. This submission is recorded and the writ petition is closed. K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE P.N. RAVINDRAN , JUDGE ks. K.R.UDAYABHANU,J. =================== CRL.A.NO. OF 200 JUDGMENT DATE: ......2006 =====================