- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3601 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.3601 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.3601 OF 2005 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.3600 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.3600 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.3600 OF 2005 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Mr.S.R.Shinde, A.P.P. for Applicant-State Ms Preetam Tendolkar i/b Mr.M.S.Karnik for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : SEPTEMBER 5,2006. : SEPTEMBER 5,2006. : SEPTEMBER 5,2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned A.P.P. for the Applicant and the learned Advocate for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5. Application s strongly opposed by the Advocate for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5 by submitting that the delay is not properly explained. 2. After having gone through the Application, I find that there is sufficient explanation for delay. Sufficient cause is made out. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE