HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1978 of 2011 Date : 07.02.2011 Between : B. Sudheer. …..Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Education Department & others. …..Respondents HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1978 of 2011 ORDER : In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks directions by way of Mandamus, declaring the inaction on the part of respondents 1 to 6 on the complaint made by the petitioner against the 7th respondent, 6as illegal. It is the grievance of the petitioner that though the 7th respondent is simultaneously prosecuting two courses of study i.e. Law course in the 5th respondent-College and Bachelor of Arts course in the 6th respondent-college, and inspite of bringing it to the notice of respondents 1 to 6, no action is being taken. It is the case of the petitioner that he is a student studying B.Tech. II year in Bharath Institute of Engineering and Technology, Hyderabad, and is a member of National Students Union of India of A.P. State Unit, which is an affiliated body to Indian National Congress, a political party. It is his case that for the purpose of contesting to the State Unit, one should be a studying student in any of the colleges. It is alleged that the 7th respondent, who is admitted into the Law college, has simultaneously obtained admission into the 6th respondent-College for degree course, and by producing the same, he has contested for the elections for the President of A.P. State Unit and he was elected illegally. It is contended that once the petitioner is already admitted to the 5th respondent-Law College, he could not have been permitted by the 6th respondent-college to pursue his degree course. If the petitioner is aggrieved of the 7th respondent being elected to the post of President of A.P. State Unit of National Students Union of India, it is always open to him to question the same by appropriately instituted proceedings. So far as the present writ petition is concerned, petitioner himself has produced the copy of the letter, dated 19th February 2010, issued by the 5th respondent-college, stating that the 7th respondent has studied his II year of 5-year LL.B course during the year 2007-08 and he was detained during that year. The said certificate further states that the 7th respondent was not promoted to the III year during 2008-09 and that he is not on the roles of the college after that academic year. In that view of the matter, once the name of the 7th respondent is not maintained on the roles of the 5th respondent-college, I do not find any illegality in admission of the 7th respondent in the 6th respondent-college to pursue his Bachelor of Arts course. For the aforesaid reasons, I do not find any merit in this writ petition for grant of directions as prayed for. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 7th February 2011 ajr