IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14661 of 2010 UMESH KUMAR SUMAN . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2. 20.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. Since the interest of respondent no. 12 are sought to be adequately protected at this stage, the Court does not consider it necessary to issue notice to him while disposing off the writ petition since the Court has declined interference with the impugned order at this stage. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of the District Magistrate, Madhubani dated 03.08.2010/6.8.2010/ 19.8.2010 by which he has set aside the order of the Block Development Officer dated 20.5.2010 canceling the appointment of respondent no.12. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the District Magistrate has in fact opined that the respondent no. 12 was a resident of Mumbai. He should have called for a forensic report rather than to set aside the order of the Block Development Officer. Reliance is placed on an enquiry report dated 10.03.2010. Counsel for the State submitted that at least the first part of the order requires no interference. This Court is satisfied that the finding of the District Magistrate with regard to the petitioner being at Mumbai for vocation and then returning home after selection requires no interference. In so far as the second ground with regard to the alleged defective application is concerned, the District Magistrate has arrived at a conclusion on conjectures and surmises. Having noticed the issue, he should have proceeded in accordance with law to the final culmination of a conclusive decision in accordance with law after calling for a forensic report. Only if the petitioner represents before the District Magistrate within 30 days from today, let the District Magistrate issue notice to the parties including respondent no. 12 and then proceed to pass final conclusive orders on the second aspect of the matter preferably within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order The orders impugned dated 03.08.2010/ 06.08.1998/ 19.08.2010 shall not be an impediment in the passing of a fresh order by the District Magistrate. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)