HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ' WRIT PETITEON (S) N0. 1077 of2009 PETITIONER Kushwa Prasad Sao 3/0 Late Shri Rajai Prasaé Sao, Aged about '72 years, Retired Assismut Teacher, R10 Viilage Banjari Post Jewara, Biock Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) RES?ONDENTS : 1. Siaie ofChhattisgarh Through: The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) . 2. Accountam Gexiera] Raipur District Raipur (0G) VERSUS 3. District Education 0&cer, Raigarh District Raigarh (CG) 4. Block Education Oiiicer, Block Sarangarh, Distt Raigarh (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTKTUTION OF INDIA $3: H0n’ble Shri Satish K. Agnillotri. J. Pre$ent1 Shri Sanjay Patel, Advocatc for the petiiioner. Shrl Arum Sat). Government Advocate for the State/respondent No. 1. 3 and 4. V15 Shannila Singhai, Assisiant Solicitor General for the respondent No. 2. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 2?; day of February, 2009) With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. This matter pertains to payment of retire} benefits This Court, in the matter of W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baijriath Mandel Vs; The State of Chhattisgarh & Others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Govemment, pursuant to the order dated i9.06.2006 ‘passed in WP. No. 1961/2096 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Govemment and othersDI’and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in MCC. No. 105 of ZGGS (State of Chhattisgaxh & Others Vs. Baijnath 7 l k) Mandal mad an0$11er). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgmem and order dated 31$ of January, 2008 passed in WP. No. 4642/2004 Baijnath Mandal (supra) as submitted by leamed counsel appeariag fQr ths paities. 1. Wi‘ah the consent of the parties, ihis petiiion is accordmgiy di$posad of in tho same ierms is. i116 office of the Advocate Geheral is directe§ to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from ihe date of rece§pt of a copy of the petition from the petifioner and this order‘ Thereafxer, the Commiftee shall issue notice to the yetitioner and the ottieers coaeemed, withm a further period of 15 days. The Committee shed} consider and pass order, in accordance with iaw, after affording proper oppormnity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may file additioaai documents: if necessaiy. The entire exercise, including payment of retirai dues, if any; to the petitioner be completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order. 4 ’i‘he petitioner shail suppiy extra copy of the petition to Shri Anni Sao, Government Advocate for the State/respondents i; 3 and 4, for forwarding the same to the Committee. 5. In case of grievance with regard to non-payment of pensionery dues, it is not necessary to file a writ petition before this Court directly. The representation’application can be moved before the Pension Committee as stated above. The Pension Committee shall not refuse to entertain the representation/appiication, if so tiled directly. Sd/— 1m Satish K. Agnihotri Judge l 1 . ‘ l l . it; .l t Amit