THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO SECOND APPEAL No.125 OF 2003 Date:22.09.2011 Between: S.Ahmed Alisha and another .. Appellants And Syed Usman and others .. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO SECOND APPEAL No.125 OF 2003 JUDGMENT: The counsel for the appellants submits that the second appellant died and the first appellant is working as Constable in CISF. The address of the first appellant is not known. When notices were sent to respondents 1 to 3, they returned with an endorsement that all of them died. In that view of the matter, no purpose would be served by ordering fresh notice or granting time to take steps. The Second Appeal is accordingly dismissed for default/non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ (V.V.S. RAO, J) 22.09.2011 KH