IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER TUESDAY, THE 23RD SEPTEMBER 2008 / 1ST ASWINA 1930 W.P(C).No. 27353 of 2008(F) ----------------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- ANANDAN P., ANANDA BHAVANAM, THAVALAPPARA, PERINJOTTAKKAL P.O., KONNI, SECRETARY, GRAMA VIKASANA SAMITHI, THAVALAPPARA, KONNI, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.VINOY VARGHESE KALLUMOOTTILL RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. CHIEF ENGINEER (SOUTHERN REGION), KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, P.H.DIVISION, PATHANAMTHITTA. 4. SECRETARY, DISTRICT PANCHAYATH, PATHANAMTHITTA. 5. SECRETARY, KONNI GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KONNI. R1 TO R3 BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.M.DINESH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & A.K.BASHEER, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.27353 of 2008 ------------------------------------------ Dated, this the 23rd day of September, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu, C.J. This petition is styled as a public interest litigation. According to the petitioner, the respondents herein are not providing sufficient water taps for supply of water in the locality of Thavalappara, Konni in Pathanamthitta District. 2. In the writ petition filed, except making certain bald allegations, the petitioner has not supported those assertions and allegations by producing appropriate documents. In that view of the matter, we cannot accept the bald assertions made by the petitioner. 3. When the matter was taken up for admission, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that now the Grama Panchayat has passed a resolution and in that they have taken a decision. In our opinion, if for any reason the resolution passed by the Grama Panchayat is adverse to the interest of the petitioner and similarly placed persons, he would definitely question the same before appropriate forum. 4. In that view of the matter, we decline to entertain this writ petition. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE (A.K.BASHEER) JUDGE vns