IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43362 of 2010 VINAY SINGH, SON OF LATE TRIVENI SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.3.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The sole petitioner prays for anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 147, 148, 447, 341, 323, 324, 307 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the present matter relates to the case and counter case and the allegations against the petitioner are of general nature and specific allegations are only against Rajiv Singh and Amarendra Singh. It is also submitted that all the remaining eight accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court by order dated 8.11.2010 passed in Cr.Misc.Nos.35940/2010 and 36271/2010 and the case of the petitioner stands on the same footing as that of the other accused and on better footing than that of Rajiv Singh and Amarendra Singh. On a consideration of the aforesaid fact that all the accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court, it is directed that the petitioner (Vinay Singh) in the event of - 2 - his arrest/surrender within four weeks from today shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Khagaria Gangaur P.S. Case No.137/2010 to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria, subject to other conditions laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Indian Penal Code. It is further directed that like the other accused persons the petitioner shall also be physically present before the Court below on each and every date till disposal of the case. In case of failure on two consecutive dates, the bail granted to the petitioner shall be deemed to be cancelled. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J. )