{1} cp6510.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.65 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.352 OF 2002 Kondiba Vaijnathrao Bomnale Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.Sanjay Kolhare, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.D.Kaldate, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1. Mr.V.D.Gunale, advocate for respondents no.2 and 3. CORAM : R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 30 th March, 2011 PER COURT: 1 This petition is directed against the order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.352/2002. 2 In view of the order passed in the aforesaid writ petition, this Court directed the Tribunal to decide the appeal expeditiously, after extending an opportunity of hearing to both the parties. 3 It is pointed out that the Tribunal has decided the matter and allowed the appeal presented by the petitioner. The petitioner shall have liberty to take steps for execution of the order passed by the Tribunal or in the event of violation of any order, he {2} cp6510.odt may have liberty to proceed against the Management by presenting appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum. So far as instant Contempt Petition is concerned, same is misconceived and, therefore, stands dismissed. R.M.BORDE JUDGE ******* adb/cp6510