WP(C) 3515/2005 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. SAIKIA (Amitava Roy,J) Heard Mr. N. Dutta, learned Senior counsel for the petitioners, Ms. M. Hazarika, learned Standing Counsel, G.M.D.A. assisted by Ms. A. Ajitsaria, Advocate and M r. J. Roy, learned counsel for Respondent No.3. The learned Sr. Counsel for the petitioners with regard to the factual backgroun d of the present lis has submitted with reference to the No Objection certificat es dated 08.10.2003 and 19.10.2004 granted by the GMDA that the petitioners pres ently intend to complete the constructions in terms thereof and to facilitate th e same, seeks to apply to the said statutory body for appropriate extension of t ime originally granted by these certificates. According to Mr. Dutta, though, t he petitioner No.2 on behalf of petitioner No.1 had meanwhile approached the GMD A to submit such an application, the endeavour met a lukewarm response, presumab ly, according to him, due to the pendency of the instant proceedings. The learne d Sr. Counsel on behalf of the petitioners, has therefore, sought for the leave of this Court to file such application(s) with the GMDA. Ms. Ajitsaria, in response has submitted that in the facts and circumstances of the case, no leave as prayed for from this court is necessary and that if the pe titioners submit such application(s), the same would be considered and disposed of by the GMDA in accordance with law. In the above view of the matter, without offering any comment on the legality or permissibility of such application(s) contemplated to be filed by the petitione rs for the aforementioned purpose, we part with the observation that if so advis ed, they may submit the same and in that eventuality needless to say, the GMDA w ould dispose those in accordance with law.