IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.714 of 2010 SHAILENDRA SINGH @ SHAILU SINGH S/O MURLIDHAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------------- 2. 13.08.2010 The Petitioner seek quashing of the order dated 24.11.2009 passed by the 2nd Additional District & Session Judge, Naugachia by which he has allowed prosecution to lead secondary evidence i.e. the carbon copy of the Post Mortem report in Naugachia (Parbatta) P.S. Case No. 451/2004. On going through the impugned order, I find that the court has considered that the post mortem examination report was not available with the prosecution and therefore, it had made a prayer for bringing on record the photo copy of the post mortem examination report as also that it was satisfied that same was not on record and if, an inquiry was done, it would further delay the trial. I see no infirmity in the order dated 24.11.2009 and therefore, decline to interfere. However, it is observed that the objection with regard to the admissibility of the document will be open to the accused persons at the relevant stage. With these observation, this application is disposed off. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )