IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.34447 of 2011 Rajesh Kumar Das Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 14.10.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the Accounts clerk in the office of the District Superintendent of Education, Araria, is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 420, 406,409, 120B, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. In the F.I.R., it is alleged that the Headmaster and Incharge Headmaster deposited the cheques issued for construction of building of the schools in the PACCS’s account of the School Education Committee but subsequently the PACCS did not honour the cheques as a result of which it is alleged that the amount has been misappropriated. It is submitted by Mr. Sanjeev Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was not named in the F. I. R. but at the belated stage of investigation, the supervising officer 2 contrary to the prosecution case in the F.I.R. alleged that it was the petitioner who transmitted the cheques to the PACCS. Considering the fact that prosecution’s specific stand was that the money was deposited by the Headmaster hence the accusation at the belated stage of investigation against the petitioner does not inspire confidence, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Palasi P.S. Case No. 30 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Araria, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)