HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 22nd September, 2011 2nd Bail Application No. 87 of 2011 Order on the bail application of the accused. Vinay Singh S/o Ghanshyam Singh ……. Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …….. Opposite Party In Case Crime No. 162 of 2011 U/s 408, 411, 468 and 471 I.P.C. Police Station Ranipur District Haridwar Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mrs. Pushpa Joshi, the learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Hari Om Bhakuni, the learned Brief Holder for the State. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and perusing the counter affidavit, the Court finds that the applicant is behind bars for the past six months for committing theft. It is alleged that the recovery was made from the kabari who pointed out that the applicant had sold the stolen goods to him. In view of the aforesaid, without commenting anything further on the merit of the case, the court is of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. Consequently, Bail Application is allowed. Let the applicant be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 162 of 2011, U/s 408, 411, 468 and 471 I.P.C., on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 22.07.2011 Shiv