59# $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2356/2011 PREM SAGAR SAWHNEY & ORS. Petitioners Through: Mr. S.C. Kalra, Advocate with Petitioners in person. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Respondent Through: Mi*. Pawan Bahl, APP for the State with SI Afaque Ahmed, PS Keshav Puram, Delhi. rvh". Banamali Shukla, Advocate fo Respondent No. 2 with Complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER % 27.07.2011 Crl. M.A. No. 8608/2011 (Exemptior.) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Crl. M.C. No. 2356/2011 Issue notice. Learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State. Learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of Respondent No. 2/Complainant. This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 211/1999 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Keshav Puram, New Delhi. CRL.M. C. 2356/2011 Page 1 of3 Signing Date:21.08.2024 17:03:48 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified The Complainant/Respondent No. 2 jMs. Pratima Sawhney is present in person. She states that after registration of the FIR the husband of the Respondent No. 2 and son of Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 unfortunately expired in a road accident on 5'*^ June, 2009. She also states the Petitionersand Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. She further states that as fiill and final settlement of ail the claims of the Respondent No. 2, the Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 have paid ^7.50 laldis by demand draft MNo. 878523 dated 11"^ July, 2011 drawn on PunjabNationalBank, Pune, in lieu of the claims of Respondent No. 2 and her minor daughter who will be in the custody of Respondent No. 2, however, the Petitioners would have the visitation rights for the daughter as agreed between the parties in terms of the settlement arrived at before the Mediation Centre, Rohini District Courts. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create ftarther acrimony between them, it would be in the CRL.M.C. 2356/2011 Page 2 of 3 interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Consequently, FIR No. 211/1999 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPG registered at PS Keshav Puram, New Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. Parties, who are identified by their respective counsels, have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court. The petition is disposed of. Order dasti. MUKTA GUPTA, J. •> JULY 27,2011 'vn' fc- )^ 4 Page 3 of3 CRL.M.C.2356/2011^.L'