1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:24.03.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN W.P.(MD)Nos.3440 and 3441 of 2011 and M.P.(MD).Nos.1 of 2011 S.Kalimuthan ...Petitioner in both WPs Vs 1.The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Medical and Rural Health Service Department, Chennai. 2.The Director of Medical and Rural Health Service, Directorate Office, Chennai-600 006. 3.The Joint Director of Medical and Rural Health Service, Family Welfare (I/C) Sivagangai. ...Respondents in both WPs Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writs of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned charge memo ( in respect of W.P(MD).No.3440 of 2011) issued by the second respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.106119/rpkh1/1/2006 dated 12.11.2010 and the suspension order issued by the third respondent No.6998/E2/2010 ( in respect of W.P(MD). No.3441 of 2011) dated 18.03.2011 and quash the same. For Petitioners : M/s. J.Nisha Banu For Respondents : Mr.V.Rajasekaran Spl.Govt.Pleader COMMON ORDER Mr.V.Rajasekaran, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. By consent, these Writ Petitions are taken up together and disposed of by a common order. 2. The Writ Petition in W.P(MD).No.3440 of 2011 has been filed challenging the order of charge memo issued by the second respondent dated 12.11.2010. Likewise, W.P(MD).No.3440 of 2011 has been filed challenging the order of the suspension order issued by the third respondent dated 18.03.2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3. As far as the charge memo is concerned, I am not inclined to quash the same, since the authorities concerned has to appoint an enquiry officer, who has to go into the details about the charges against the petitioner and file a final report to the concerned authorities and thereafter, either the concerned authorities will pass orders or refer to the same to the Government to pass final orders. 4. In view of the same, I am not inclined to quash the charge memo. However, I direct the respondents to pass appropriate orders within a period of six months from today. 5. As far as the suspension order is concerned, I am not inclined to revoke the order of suspension and the same has to be considered by the authorities concerned and this Court exercising its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot consider the same. 6. Taking such view, I direct the petitioner to send a representation to the concerned authorities for revoking his suspension within 10 days from today and on receipt of the same, the authorities concerned is directed to consider the same on merits and in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders thereon. In the result, these Writ Petitions are disposed of in the above terms. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Medical and Rural Health Service Department, Chennai. 2.The Director of Medical and Rural Health Service, Directorate Office, Chennai-600 006. 3.The Joint Director of Medical and Rural Health Service, Family Welfare (I/C) Sivagangai. W.P.(MD)Nos.3440&3441 of 2011 24.03.2011 ssm PAM 31.03.2011/4C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/