IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1862 of 2009 1. MANORMA DEVI 2. Bhakhtu Rai Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.10548 of 2009 1. BASULI RAI 2. Raj Bihari Rai Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners in Cr. Misc. No.1862 of 2009 are wife of the deceased and her brother. The petitioners in Cr. Misc. No. 10548 of 2009 are cousin of the wife. The allegation by the informant, father of the deceased is that he went to the house of the in-laws to collect money dues when he died their suddenly. The post mortem report does not reveal any external injury. The Viscera has been preserved. The submission is of a compromise between them and the informant. The impugned order of rejection of the courts below is hardly of any help to enable this Court to adjudicate the matter further. Given the nature of relationship between the parties and the absence of any materials, at this stage, in the case diary, the impugned order of rejection is not sustainable. Let the petitioners, above named, surrender in the - 2 - Court below within a period of four weeks from today when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail during the period of investigation till submission of charge sheet on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur in connection with Danapur (Akilpur) Police Case No. 124 of 2007, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)