IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH MAY 2008 / 7TH JYAISHTA 1930 RP.No. 526 of 2008(B) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.10094/2008 Dated 26/03/2008 .................... REVISION PETITIONER/3RD RESPONDENT IN THE WP: -------------------------------------------------------------- O.K. KURIAPPAN, S/O. LATE KUNJIPALU, OLLOOKARAN HOUSE, P.O. NELLAYIL, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SMT.PREETHY KARUNAKARAN RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 IN THE WP: ------------------------------------------------------ 1. OFS INDUSTRIES (P) LTD., 49 A & B/V PERAMBRA, KODAKARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT WITH ITS REG.OFFICE AT 125/126 DAMJI SHAMJI UDYOG BHAVAN, REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR, O.K.JOSE, AGED 55 S/O. LATE KUNJIPALU. 2. KODAKARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MUKUNDAPURAM, THRISSUR DIST 3. THE SECRETARY, KODAKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MUKUNDAPURAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY SRI.M.G.KARTHIKEYAN SRI.NIREESH MATHEW THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P.No. 526 OF 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 28th day of May, 2008 ORDER Even though the grounds raised in the Review Petition cannot be said to be totally unattractive, in view of the position that in compliance with the directions in the judgment an order has been passed, I do not think that this court may be justified in reviewing the judgment especially since I am informed that the order passed has come to be against the writ petitioner. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE JUDGE sv.