•^ S.l. ^^s^ w^rSr---••" BEFOiiE^H^HQI^L^HIGH_C^)URT_OF_CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRJT PETmQNJ10^_2j_6L/2QQ6 PETITIONER B RESPONDENTS yri co^ «.'-. fe^/"> Nagar Paiika Kharsia, fhrough - Its Chief Municipal Officer, Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.)- VERSU^ 1. The ControUing Aufhority under '' fhe Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 / District Labour OfEce, Raigarh (C.G.) 2. Mohaa Lal Yadav, son of Shri ^ Seturam Yadav, resident of Gopi Mahka, Tah. Kharsiya, District Raigarh (C.G.) ^^^l^^- vH^^^G-^^ y^^" WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. / XI-HC—78 aii^r "^i ft';(N? wif dtAti siiiit *Sf L ^ T w*itiTtti*n<!h 'yss •<ii'yi<'i<<, ©fll'y'Ko,TsK'ii'My. ^.h£.^l:..^.6.U........... »l*<l<ft 1^ •^iooc sil^i Tfs??; (li^i^«<<!sr) wnw ^iftn sii^'1 S.B: Hon'ble Justice Mr. Pritlnker Dhwaker trie 02-07-2009: Shri Shashank Thakur, Shri Arvind Dubey, Pan^l Counsel for the petition^r has been filed against the Controlling Authority, Paymenljand Counsel for the petitionj order impugned, the petitionej the Prescribed Authority or wants to withdraw the presenf before the Prescribed Authoritf. filed the writ petition before barred; therefore the Authority point of limitation liberally. Accordingly, the writ p| with aforesaid liberty. In the eventuality of filirjg will decide the same in limitation would be considered petition was pending before thiis filirjg thls 4>wl<r1'(fl^ ^li^df'^ Fs*<l <^q<-$K '^aiRnsii^T 4ounsel for the petitioner. Lawyer for the State. submits that the present petition ^rder dated 25.7.2005 passed by GratuityAct, 1972. i|r further submits that against the has remedy to file appeal before State Govemment therefore he petition with liberty to fite appeal tf. He further submits that as he has Court, his appeal would be time ty may be directed to consider the tetition is dismissed as withdrawn accctrdance the appeal, concerned Authority with law and the point of liberally; keeping in mind that writ Court. Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge