1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 2558 of 2011 Mohammadiya Minority Society VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and another - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. A. B. Mirza, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. P. D. Kothari, A.G.P. for the respondent nos.1 and 2. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATE : 9th August, 2011. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The proposal of the petitioner to start a primary school in English medium on ‘Permanent No Grant’ basis was rejected by the impugned order dated 27.12.2010 on the ground that the petitioner had not stated in the undertaking that he would run the school on ‘Permanent No Grant’ basis. The permission was also refused on the ground that the latest and up to date accounts report was not furnished to the respondents. On hearing the learned counsel for the parties, it appears that the petitioner, in any case, cannot be permitted to run the primary school for the academic year 2010-2011 or 2011-2012 and it would be necessary for the petitioner to apply afresh for grant of permission to run the primary school from 2 the academic year 2012-2013. Mr. Mirza, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that an application in that regard would be submitted by the petitioner- society to the respondents. In case that is submitted, the respondents shall decide the application in accordance with law, before March, 2012 and communicate the decision to the petitioner so that the petitioner can take appropriate action of either running the school or challenging the order. The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE Diwale