FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1877 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1877 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1877 OF 2006 ------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram Court’s or Judge’s orders appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders ------------------------------------------------------- Mr.K.V.Saste APP for the State. Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Date : 13.7.2006 PC 1. None for the applicants. None appeared for the applicants on 6.6.2006 and therefore, I have dismissed this matter for want of prosecution on 12.6.2006. APP states that the matter was restored on 10.7.2006. Today also nobody is present. In the circumstances, application is again dismissed for want of prosecution. (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) 2. The matter is mentioned at 3.00 P.M. by Shri Z.M.Avhad Advocate for the applicants. He states that he does not practise : 2 : in Bombay and has come from Nashik. His train was late by 15 minutes. In the interest of justice, matter is restored to file. Heard both sides. 3. This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail. The applicants are shown as accused in C.R.No.139/2006 registered by Panchavati police station for alleged offences under Sections 306 r/w 34 of IPC. The offence is registered on the complaint of the father of Vaishali by name Chabu Sathe. Vaishali was working as a maid servant in the house of applicant no.1. On the date of incident i.e. on 14.3.2006 both the applicants came to the house of Deepali and insisted that she should proceed on the motor cycle alongwith them. There was some function in the house of Deepali and therefore, she refused to go with them. But due to repeatedly insisting, Deepali has gone with them on their : 3 : motor cyele. Later on at 11.30 P.M. at the same evening both these applicants came at the house of Deepali and enquired with her father whether she had come home. After mid-night at 1.30 P.M. applicant no.2 came to the house of Deepali and once again made enquiries. Deepali was ultimately found in the well on 15.3.2006. In the circumstances, not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Application stands rejected. (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J)