1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4892 OF 1998 Sanjeevini Shikshan Prasarak Mandal ..Petitioner V/s The State of Maharashtra and others. ..Respondents ......... Mr.S.P. Kausale holding for Mr.S.B. Talekar, Advocate for petitioner. Mr.D.R. Korade, A.G.P. for respondent no.1. Mr.R.V. Ghuge, Advocate for respondent nos.2 and 3. Mr.V.D. Gunale, Advocate for respondent no.6. ........ (CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) DATE : 23rd June, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel. 2. Mr.Ghuge and Mr.Gunale, appearing for respondent nos.2, 3 and 6 submit that the Petition has become infructuous, because no interim relief was granted and the petitioner's claim for commencement of college. The petitioner granted liberty to move afresh proposal as per the order dated 25th August, 1999. Mr.S.P. Kausale holding for Mr.S.B. Talekar submits that his office brief is missing. However, accepting the statement made by the respondents' counsel, Petition is disposed of as infructurous. (V.R.KINGAONKAR) JUDGE gas/wp4892.98