..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.73 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.94 OF 2007 1.Ganesh Mahadeo Patil & 2.Smt.Anjana Mahadeo Patil. ...Applicants. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Mr.Sandesh Patil i/b. P.P.Jadhav, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr.D.P.Adsule, APP, for State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 20th February, 2007. DATED : 20th February, 2007. DATED : 20th February, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicants-orig.accused and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicants have been convicted under section 498-A r/w. 34 of IPC and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for two years each. The applicants are now seeking bail. 3. The learned Advocate for the applicants states that the applicants were on bail during the ..(2).. trial and they have not misused the liberty granted to them. This statement is not controverted by the prosecution. 4. Looking to the above facts and the evidence, I am inclined to release the applicants on bail. 5. The applicants to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.25000/- each with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The applicants shall report to Ashta Police Station, Sangli once in a fortnight, till disposal of their Appeal. 6. Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)