IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4489 of 2011 DOMAN MAHTO SON OF LATE MATTAR MAHTO, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA AURANGABAD (MAHUA SAHID) WARD NO.29, P.S. AURANGABAD (TOWN), DISTT. AURANGABAD(BIHAR). ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN/SECRETARY, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA. 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER-CUM-CHIEF ENGINEER, MAGADH ELECTRIC SUPPLY REGION, GAYA. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNTS, MAGADH ELECTRIC SUPPLY REGION, GAYA. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ELECTRICITY ENGINEER, SUPPLY DIVISION, AURANGABAD. 5. THE ASSISTANT ELECTRICAL ENGINEER, ELECTRIC SUPPLY DIVISION, AURANGABAD (BIHAR). ... ... RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 10.3.2011. Heard Shri Anil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and ShriAjay Kumar Gautam, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.1 to 5/Bihar State Electricity Board. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 30.6.2010 as Class-IV employee (Driver) from Electric Supply Division, Aurangabad, has prayed for directing the respondents to make payment of all his retiral dues. It has been categorically stated that all the retiral dues have already been sanctioned, but payment is not being made to him. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner has filed proper representation 2 before respondent no.2/General Manager-cum- Chief Engineer, Magadh Electric Supply Region, Gaya. However, no decision has been taken till date. With the consent of parties, the writ petition is being disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent nos.2 and 4 i.e. General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer, Magadh Electric Supply Region, Gaya and the Executive Electricity Engineer, Supply Division, Aurangabad respectively within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, both the respondents are directed to examine the same and pass appropriate order redressing all the grievances of the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of filing of such representation. It is directed that within aforesaid time, the respondents will take all steps to clear all the retiral dues of the petitioner. In case of refusal, both the respondents are directed to pass a speaking order within aforesaid time i.e. two months from the date of filing of such representation. It 3 is made clear that petitioner shall also be entitled to get admissible statutory interest. With aforesaid observation and direction, the petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)