1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4342 OF 2004 IN SECOND APPEAL ST. NO.13827 OF 2003 Sunanda Eknathrao Kulkarni Applicant Versus Balaji Dnynoba Munde Respondent Mr.Vivek Bhavthankar, advocate for the applicant. Mr.S.V.Mundhe, advocate for Respondents. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 11th September, 2009. P.C.: This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 161 days occurred in presenting second appeal. Heard learned Counsel for respective parties. For the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed. Delay of 161 days occurred in presenting appeal stands condoned. Civil Application stands disposed of. (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE ******* adb/sast1382703 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL ST. NO.13827 OF 2003 Sunanda Eknathrao Kulkarni Appellant Versus Balaji Dnynoba Munde Respondent Mr.Vivek Bhavthankar, advocate for the appellant. Mr.S.V.Mundhe, advocate for Respondents. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 11th September, 2009. P.C.: The subject matter of challenge is in respect of recovery of amount of Rs.20,000/-. In view of Section 102 of the Code of Civil Procedure, appeal is not maintainable. Hence, appeal stands dismissed. Pending Civil Applications do not survive and stand disposed of. (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE ******* adb/sast1382703