IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Application No. 437 of 2009 Natthu and another …… Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and another …… Respondents …….. Mr. B.M.Pingal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Nandan Arya, A.G.A. for the State. Mr. Vivek Shukla, Advocate for respondent no. 2. Hon’ble V.K. GUPTA, C. J. After hearing Mr. B.M.Pingal, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Nandan Arya, learned Assistant Government Advocate for the State, Mr. Vivek Shukla, learned counsel for respondent no. 2 and upon perusal of the material placed on record, I am fully convinced that no interference by this Court in exercise of jurisdiction U/s 482 Cr.P.C. is warranted. The petition deserves to be dismissed. The petition is dismissed in limine. Consequently, Compounding Application ( CRMA No. 683 of 2009) also stands dismissed. (V. K. Gupta, C.J.) 25.06.2009 A