iiiasi^s® C ^ fos/^ IN THEHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) S'^l^t'T- ^^^,— 7^ W.P. fe.1 No......./.^..f...^.7../2007 PETITIONER: ^' ^ y /?•••'" ..' €:^>-' ay ..••''.-€".\">A .,.--^\ ^ \--'l ^--y^ Vinod Kumar Shukla S/o Late Ghri K. P. Shukla Aged about 61 years R/o H-2/119, Narmada Nagar District- Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS ¥ ^*' RESPONDENTS: 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Department of Commerce and Industries D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director ^] y Industries Directorate L.I.C Premises Pandri, Raipur (C.G.) 3. State of Madhya Pradesh Through the Secretary Department of Commerce and Industries Vallabh Bhawan, Mantralaya Bhopal (M. P.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHERSUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS:- ^ Q T ? ^^L l ? f^. ^^ 3 3 r~^ ~T** /^i y-* E*<»[ ? * ^ t A "^-T" ? f^ir *-:*^ ^ r^ ? ? . r^ t s ^ ^^ ?*i ? »?*-». HiGH COURT OF ChtHATTtSGARH : B1LASPUR VtfRiT_PEimOM (S) NQ.73_71'3f 2007 :T!TiONER RESPONDeNTo (VVrit Peiition under Article 226 of the Con Slngie Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Versus State of Chhattlsgarh & Others Constitution of Ind Agnihotri, J. resent:- Shri Varun Sharma, counsei for the petitioner. S'nri A-V. Sridhar, Pa'nei No.1 &2. Sht-i Sachin Singh Rajput, resoondent No.3, le State/res le State ORDER ('ORAU (Fassed on this 2"c day of February', 2010) 1. With the consent of learned counse! appearing for ths parties, the peiition is he'ard finally. 2. At the very outset, iearned counsel appearing for the peti'aoner submits that so far as oraver ciause 7.ii is concsrned, bv ordar dated 28-4-2008 (Annexure - R/1) the suspenslon order has already been revoked and the period spent by the petitioner under suspension has been treated as on duty. 3. Shri Sridhar, learned Pane! Lawyer appearing for ihe State/ rssDondents No.1 & 2, concurs wflth the submission (rf the Detitioner. 4. So far as prayer cSause 7.1ii i.e. for release of payment of QPF fii aratuitv' is concerned, iearned counse! for the oet'rtloner subroits that the resoondent authorities mav be directed to consider and deciae the case ot ffie peUuoner, in accoraance wim law ana pass appropriats orders as early as possibls preferably v/ithin a period of weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. Shri Sridhar, iearned Fanei Lawyer appearing for the State/ respondents No.1 & 2, submits that the GPF case of ths petitioner has aiready been fonwarded to the office of the Accountant Generai Tor grant of sancilon. With regard to payment of gratuity, the State wlii look into the matter and pass appropriate orders^ within the prescribed period as afore-stated, in accordance 'with ia'jv. 6. !n view offoregoina, according to iearned counset aocearina for the peiitioner nofhinc; sumves in this petition for adjudication. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Gown Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge