WP(C) 3324/2008 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Mr. Mannan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sarma, lear ned State counsel. In challenge is the order dated 14.07.2008, passed by the Director, Soci al Welfare, Assam, transferring the petitioner from Pub-Mangaldoi ICDS Project t o Rupahi ICDS Project vice respondent No.3. Being aggrieved, the petitioner, in the meantime, has also submitted representation on 28.07.2008 before the aforeme ntioned authorities ventilating his grievances, which according to the petitione r remains unattended till date. Mr. Mannan without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petiti oner submits that the instant proceeding be closed with a direction to the above authority to consider and dispose of his representation within a time frame. Mr . Sarma has no objection to the course of disposal as suggested. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and without offering an y comment on the merits of the petitioner’s challenge to the order impugned, the petition stands closed with a direction to the Director, Social Welfare, Assam, to dispose of his representation dated 28.07.2008. The petitioner would be at liberty to supplement the representation with a fresh one or documents which in his perception may reinforce his pleas in sup port of his prayer. If the petitioner is so advised, he may do so within a week herefrom. If that is done the petitioner’s representation would be disposed of w ithin a period of two weeks thereafter. No costs.