Cr. R. No.1810/2008 19.9.2011 I have heard the learned counsel for the applicant Sanjay Choudhari, and learned counsel for the State. While passing the impugned order dated 29.8.2008, framing the charge under Section 306 of I.P.C., the Court below has referred in the opening part to the suicide note, but has thereafter totally ignored the contents of the suicide notice while discussing other evidence. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case particularly the averment made in the suicide note, which was found by the police and forms part of the record on investigation, and wherein it has been stated that Nigam aunty and uncle are responsible for the death, and some lady has been referred to, the impugned order is quashed. The matter will be reconsidered by the Trial Court in accordance with the facts, which seem to have been placed at secondary position among the list of large number of rulings cited in the impugned order. Accordingly, this revision is allowed. (Sushil Harkauli) Acting Chief Justice AK