^lliG.LS KBft^ C ^r^^ BEFORE_THE HON'BLEJ-fISH COURT OF CHHATTESSARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETETEON (C) N0. <^?>3 /2008 PETETTONER 0< ^^ ^"^ ^i ^y y Murharam Chandravanshi, S/o. Sidar Singh Chandravanshi, Aged about32-years, Sarpanch, R/o. Village Belargondi, Tohsil Chhuriya, bistrict- Rajnandgaon (C.6.) VERSUS RESPON&ENTS ^l. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Panchayat <& Rural bepartment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.6.) The Collector, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.6.) The S.D.O. bongargaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRTT PETITEON UNbER ARTECLE 226^^THE CONSTITUTTON OF INDIA 1 ^..•••;"^ ^s^ ^ %r HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR VVRIT PETITION (C) N0.5633 OF 2 PETITiONER RESPONDENTS Murharam Chandravanshi Versus State of Chhattisc Gowri (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Singie Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Shashank Thakur & Shri Arvind Dubey, Advocates Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyerforthe State. •o s;u ORDER(ORAD on this 26th day cf July, 2010) ippearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits.that the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition, to which learned counsel appearing for the State has no oblection. 2) It is ordered, as prayed for. 3) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Satish )K. Agnihotri •Judge •"^s, ^ ^ "^ l;s&IH!&.>. 1 !>i>^ 4!r 10? HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (O No. 5637 of: PETITIONER RESPONDENT Vishwambhar Prasad Sharma, S/o Late Kriparam Sharma, aged about 76 years, Retire U.D.T- Head Mater, R/o village & Post Tham Khamharia, DisU. Durg (CG). VERjSUS Registrar, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur (CG). (WTRIT PE'miON UNDER ^W.'HCLE 226 OPTHE CONSTmjTtON OF DMDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agmhotri. J.) Present : Shri B.K. Chakrabarty, Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondent. (Passed on 13 day of October, 1. The petitioner, being aggrieved by award of27 marks out of 100 in first paper, 9 marks out of 100 in second paper, 36 marks out of 100 in third paper and only 4 marks out of 100 in fourth paper in M.A. Previous (English Literature), has filed this petition seeking a direction to the respondent university to re-check his answer sheets, wherein the petitioner has been awarded 9 and 4 marks in second and fourth papers respectively, and further to conduct C.B.I. Enquiry or Enquiry by Economic Oflence Wing. 2. The only ground of challenge is that the petitioner had done very well in the examination and this was his third attempt. Thus, the marks awarded by the experts are not proper. No other grounds have been shown. On [tS -,<9^~ query, as to how much marks petitioner was awarded in the second attempt, leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner is unable to supply the information. Prior to filing of this petition, the petitioner has approached the ofGce of the Chancelior of the respondent university on 22.11.2006 (Annexure P/3). The office ofthe Chancellor, by orderdated 18.05.2007 (Annexure P/7) has already written to the Vice Chancellor of the respondent university for consideration ofhis application. 4. Be that as it may, the petitioner has failed to establish a case, wherein this Court should show any equity in his favour, as no record is available indicating that the petitioner had obtained very high marks in other papers. It is evident from the mark sheet. In other papers also, the petitioner has obtained 27 marks in first paper and 36 marks in third paper. The petitioner would hardly clear third paper by obtaining 36 perceat marks. In all other papers, the petitioner has obtained less than percent marks. 5. It is not a case where the Court should exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction to interfere with the academic functioning ofthe respondent university. The papers are valued by the experts and there is no reason to interfere with the same. The petition is meritless and deserves to be dismissed. The petrtion is accordingly dismissed summarily. Saliu Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri 'Judge ia 'ea ESB8 ss n• 88• IJS K• ^^8 'SM BS sa