IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 62 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1172 OF 2005 Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay & Thane Districts .. Petitioner V/s Maharashtra Rajya Suraksha Rakshak & General Kamgar Union & Ors. .. Respondents Ms. Lata Desai i/b Ms. Pallavi Divekar for the Petitioner. Ms. Ranjana Todankar for Respondent No.1. CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATE : 19TH DECEMBER 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. : 1. Heard Ms. Desai in support of this Review Petition. Ms.Todankar appears for Respondent No.1. Other respondents are served. Ms.Desai has filed an affidavit of service. 2. Review Petition seeks a correction of the order that we have passed in Writ Petition (L) No. 891 of 2005 on 15th April 2005. Under this order, we have directed the Petitioner to register the guards. The - 2 - exact sentence in our order is as follows:- "The persons concerned will apply to the 1st Respondent-Board and the Board will register them." Instead of the above sentence, the following sentence be substituted:- "The persons concerned will apply to the 1st Respondent-Board and the Board will consider them for registration." 3. The Review Petition is necessary because there is an error in what was recorded earlier since the right of the guards concerned is only to apply and it is for the Board to consider them for registration thereafter. 4. Review Application is allowed as above. (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)