IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1774 of 2003 BALDEO RAM SON OF LATE SHYAM RAJBANSHI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE REHUA, P.S. PAKRI BARANWA, DISTRICT NAWADAH........ PETITIONER Versus 1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 2. COMMISSIONER TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, VISHWASRAIYA BHAWAN, PATNA. 3. DEPUTY SECRETARY-CUM-COMMISSIONER, SOUTH BIHAR REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY HAVING ITS OFFICE NEAR GOLGHAR.........OPP. PARTIES. ----------- 3 12-8-2009 Heard the parties and perused the order of the Writ Court contained in annexure-1. Now the authorities have passed final order and determined final pension and final gratuity as per show cause filed on behalf of opposite party no.1. That stand is supported by the order dated 24-1- 2004 contained in annexure-3C to the show cause. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that order of the competent authority sanctioning only 90% of the pension in terms of Rule 139 of the Bihar Pension Rules is not in accordance with law. This submission cannot be entertained in contempt jurisdiction. The application is, therefore, finally disposed off. If so advised petitioner may pursue his grievance through appropriate proceeding in accordance with law. ( Shiva Kirti Singh, ACJ) Naresh - 2 -