W W= v. (A-Yvr‘ar'efsr- Shaun Clerk td A G: Blilasput unmac Wm Pemion Nof5 J“ / K {gr/W 4 E%% of 2003 / Luxmir'am Rana, 5/0 Jayaram iRana, Aged abou'r 24 years. Occupation: Shopkeeper, Govt. Fair Price Shop‘ Gram Panchayat: Tamnar, R/o ViHage'. Tammr, DisTT.: Raigarh (C.6.) 1. 5mm of Chhaf‘risgarh, Throgh‘. Deparfmenf of Food & Civil suppiy, Munfr‘alaya, D.K.5. Building, Raipur (C.G.) Coiled'or', Raigarh, Disf'r. Raigarh (C.G.) 3. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Garghoda, DIS‘H’J Raigarh (Ca) 4. Naib Tehsildar, Tammi", Dis‘H": Raigarh (C.5.) 5. Fobd Officer, Raigarh, Dis‘r’r; Raigcrh (C.6.) / 1N THE77H’lei—i couaf bFWDICATuRE A? BILAshUR. CHHATrIsGARH Versus ‘ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3888 OF 2003 (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :—‘ Shri Shashank Thakur, Advocate on behalf of Shri B.D. Guru, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 2nd day of December, 2010) ‘P Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that with the passage of time the petition has become infructuous, to which learned counsel appearing for the other side have no objection. 2. In view of foregoing, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/,— satish K. Agnihoui 'T T Judge PETITIONER Laxmiram Rana Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others