a} HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BELASPUR Wrii Petition (c) 3713 of 290? Ramnaresh S/o‘ Shvam Sunder, aged abaut 50 years, accupation — Labour, Rio. 3arangar’n Road, Kaidemuda, Raigarh (CG). PETITIONER Versus RE$PGN5ENT Munidpai Corporation, Ra§garh, through its Comméssioner, Distr§ct Raigarh (Cf-3. {Writ Petitiora under Articie 226 of the Consti'tutim of india) SB: Hon‘bie Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihoiri Present: Shri Ami: Shayma, counsel far the petitioner. Shri BD. Guru, ccunsei for the respondent. ORDER (Passed on 12th Juiy, 290?) The petitioner, ciaiming t0 be Pat§a hoider of ihe aand in diSpuie, has fiieci this petition for vague reliefs. There is no specific prayer seeking for restoration of any right or indicating that any right has been infringed thereon. 2) On perusai of papers, it appears that the Corporation authority has issued notice to the petitioner to expiain his right over the disputed iand‘ ‘ 3) Be that as it may, iearned counsel appearing for the Muaicipai Corporation submits that the petitioner has tiied a representation on 5-6-2GC7 which is pending consideration by the respondent. Learned counsei further submits that no steps for demoiition of the structure, if any, on the disputed iand be taken, tiii his representation is decided, in accordance with law. 4) in View of the above, teamed counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that nothing survives in the matter. 5) Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. l Sd/- J Satish K. Agnihotri l Judge Raj“.