7+12+13 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LA.APP. 81/2007 BHADUR SINGH & ORS. Appellant Through Mr.Pradeep Kumar and Mr.Sandeep Thakur, Advocates versus UOI THRU LAC (N.W.) DELHI Respondent Through Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate for LAC WITH + LA.APP. 82/2007 RAM PAT Appellant Through Mr.Pradeep Kumar and Mr.Sandeep Thakur, Advocates versus UOI THRU L.A.C.(N.W.)DELHI Respondent Through Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate for LAC & + LA.APP. 116/2007 % BARFI DEVI Appellant Mr.Pradeep Kumar and Mr.Sandeep Thakur, Advocates UOI Through versus Respondent Through Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate for LAC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJITSEN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.L.BHAYANA ORDER 11.07.2007 These Appeals have been filed in respect of Notificationdated 24.10.1961, and also No. 19/1983-84 of LA.APP.81/2007 Page 1of3 Signing Date:29.06.2024 17:21:54 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified Village Samaipur. Compensation payable in respect of this acquisition had come up for consideration before a Division Bench of this Court in Bboop Sbigb -vs- Union of India, 28 (1985) DLT 240 as well as in RFA 222/79. This Court had fixed the market value of the acquired land in question at the rate of Rs.7,000/- per Bigha. Indeed, a perusal of the Appeals discloses that the Appellants have themselves relied on Bboop Singb. Learned counsel for the Appellants submits that Bboop Singb dealt with Village Badli and, therefore, would not be applicable. The Court below has noted that the Petitioners have been remiss altogether in leading any evidence proving the market price of the land in question. The Notifications in these Appeals and in Bboop Singb are the same and the villages are adjoining each other. In RFA 222111 the Division Bench has already noted that the value of the lands in both villages would be identical. This objection is, therefore, of no substance. In the impugned Order the Court has applied the verdict in RFA 222/77. Furthermore, the Appellants before us have also made a reference to and in fact relied upon L.A.APP. No. 68/2005titled Hira Singh-vs- Unionof India,in whichAppeal the DivisionBenchpresidedover byHon'bleChiefJusticehad by Order dated July 14, 2005 followed the determination of LA.APP.81/2007 Page 2 of3 compensation in RFA 222/77 and on these grounds directed that the Appellants would be entitled to a higher value of land at i Rs.7,000/- per Bigha. ,Therefore, there has been ajujiicial determination of the price of the land by two Division Benches, and we are in respectful agreement with them. The Appeals are without merit and are dismissed. JULY 11, 2007 nt LA.APP. 81/2007 VIKRAMAJIT SENJ S.L.BHAYANA, J Page 3 of 3