IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11585 of 2010 PRAMOD KUMAR KAMAT, SON OF SRI KUMAR LAL KAMAT ALIAS KAMAL KANT KAMAT, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-ALOLA, POLICE STATION-GHOGHARDIHA, DISTRICT-MADHUBANI…………………….PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………………OPPOSITE PARTY. -------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Madhu Sudan Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the State : Mr. U.S.P. Singh, A.P.P. --------- 2. 29.4.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 469 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is not named in the First Information Report and later on merely on the basis that the petitioner was helping the accused persons in getting the forged signature in connivance with the officials of the Bank, he has been made accused in this case. However, it is submitted that there is no material against the petitioner regarding the alleged - 2 - crime. The petitioner is stated to be in custody since 28.12.2009 and is having clean antecedent. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Pramod Kumar Kamat, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M., Jhangharpur, District-Madhubani, in connection with Ghoghardiha P.S. Case No.79 of 2009/ G.R. No.1111 of 2009, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be the close relative or his family member, who will file affidavit before the court below giving full genealogy showing his or her relationship with the petitioner. Further, after his release in this case, if the petitioner is again found to be involved in criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Further, the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial in the court below. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of the trial without any reasonable cause - 3 - being shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)