1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (w) NO.3178 /2010 & CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6135 /2007 & CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5692/1007 & WRIT PETITION NO. 578/2007 (Gulab Hajare vs. The Commissioner, Nagpur Division and others ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 10 th DECEMBER, 2010. Heard. The dispute between the parties pertains to possession of agricultural lands and arises out of the proceedings under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vid.Region ) Act, 1958. There are two petitions filed against each other by the parties. In the circumstances as dispute appears to be pending since 1998 early hearing is granted. List the writ petition No. 518/2007 with Writ Petition No.1449/2007 as requested by parties for final hearing in the week commencing from 14.2.2010. In view of these orders, it is apparent that CA ( w) No. 6135/2007 for revocation of rule CA (w) No. 578 /2008 for dismissal of petition; CA: 5692 /2008 for dismissal of petition filed by respondent no.9 all are rendered infructuous. Advocate Deshpande says that these applications should be considered at the stage of 2 final hearing. However as the matter is directed to be listed for final hearing, these applications are disposed of as infructious; but the respondent no.9 is given right to move appropriate application if hearing does not take place as scheduled. JUDGE sahare.