THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.29739 of 2010 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents 1 and 2. In this writ petition, it is the grievance of the petitioners that in spite of their lodging complaints, dated 19.09.2010 and 25.10.2010 against respondents 3 to 5, respondents 1 and 2 are not taking any action. It is the case of the petitioners that they are lawful owners and possessors of plots bearing Nos.29 and 81 admeasuring 390 and 1241 sq.yards covered by Survey Nos.10, 15/1 and 11/5 respectively situated at Hydershahkote Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, having purchased the same by way of registered sale deeds from the earlier owners. It is their grievance that though their vendors have succeeded to the property in O.S.No.765 of 2005 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, on 19.09.2010, respondents 3 to 5 along with anti-social elements came to their property and threatened them with dire consequences, if they do not vacate the said property. On instructions, it is submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home that there is no such proof of receipt of the complaint of the petitioners on 19.09.2010. Though it is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioners that there is an endorsement on the complaint, dated 19.09.2010, as it is stated that the said complaint is not being traced in the Office of respondents 1 and 2, I deem it appropriate to permit the petitioners to submit copies of the complaints, dated 19.09.2010 and 25.10.2010, to the second respondent – Station House Officer, Rajendranagar Police Station, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District. If such complaints are submitted, the second respondent shall look into and consider the same whether any offence is committed by respondents 3 to 5 or not. It is made clear that if there is any case made out against respondents 3 to 5, the second respondent is directed to proceed to take steps in accordance with law. Subject to the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 6th DECEMBER, 2010. kvni