HON'BLE SHR! SUEMiL KUMAR SENHA, J. t'r.' Ku. Arshiya, aged about 13 years, D/o Late Shekh Hanif (Minor) Through - Guardian Smt. Sayara C7 ageci asout &,/ years, Vv'd/o Late Shekh Husain (Grand Mother) both R/o Behind Maszia'; Nehru Nagar, Bhiial - 3, Distt. Dur{ Smt. Teherun Nisha, Wd/o Late Shekh Hanif, Aged about 41 ysars, Bhiiai - 3, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Present Address: Office of the Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Somni, Distt. Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh State Electricitv Board, Shilai, DisS. Durg (C.G.) Misc. Appeal Under Section 30 fC) of the Workmen's Compensation 1993 i^.i., iS^&'ff Present : Shri Uttam Pandey, counse! for the appeEiant. (3rd March, 2008) The following order of fhe Court was passed by r> E.^ ^rf-a'SJi Learned counsel for the appeilant is heard on admission. 30 of Workmen's 2) This is ler Sectii Compensation Act, 1923 against the award dated 06.10.2007 ^" ^ B teie^^' ^y.^ passed by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Labour Court, Durg, in Case No.-89/Ke TE B-1/WCA/2004 fatal. 3) Respondent No.l-Taherun Nisha, appeilant Arshlya and Smt. Sayara Khatoon filed a joint application disbursa! of the amount of compensation of Rs.3,38,880/ deposited by the Chhattisgarh State Eiectricity Board, Empioyer I/-, deceased - Shekh Hanif. The Commissioner for Workmen's Compenss.tion on the basis of materia! placed before it found ail th< three appiicants entitied to get their share of the amount of compensation Rs. 3,38,880/-. The Commissloner, therefore, vide impugned order dated 06.10.2007 apportioned the amount of <s. 3,38.880/- in the followina manner:- 1 Smt. Taherun Nisha, widow of the deceased - Shekh Hanlf Rs.2,38,380/- 2. 3 Smt. Sayara Khatoon, mother of Rs.; the deceased - Shekh Hanif Arshiya, adopted daughter of Rs.i ie deceased - Shekh Hanif uu/- th men's ppellant 4) Shri Uttam Pandey, learned counsel for the appellant vehemently argued that the Commissioner for compensation has erred in awarding only Rs.50,000/- Ku. Arsh|ya, whereas, a major share of the Rs.2,38,380/- has been awarded to respondent Taherun Nisha. Learned counsei further submitted that \: \f ~^. '«l ? £,.,,—i-!Ta^,n '^SJ'] padma Nisha was gi'/en compassionate appointment also by respondent No.2 - Chhattlsgarh State Electricity Board. 5) The apportionment of the amount of compensation between the claimants is essentially a question of fact, which has been decided by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation or, the basis of material available before it. !n our opinion, no substantial question of law is invoived in thisappeal. 7) The appeal, therefore, is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed summariiy on merits notwithstanding that it is reported to be time-barred as many as 11 days SdA ChiefJustice Sd'- SunilKumarSinha Judge *<.