1 / °' -42" / ^J^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. WP[S] N0..^-x%^/2010 PetJtioner: !^ Respondents: ,-. ^ €--y ^ ^ \^/>>^ ^y -.^.' ^'^r, '^l^ S5>cv ^' .^" Kum. Manju Madhuri Bajpai, D/0 Late Shri A.M. Bajpai, AgedAbout 42Years, R/0 QTR.No. B-20, Pragati Vihar, Behtarai Road, BJIaspur, Dist Bilaspur, C.G Versus 1)StateofC.G., Thru: Secretary, Higher Education Deptt,, DKS Bhawan, RAIPUR C.G. STATE. 2). Prindpal, Govt M.D.P.College, Katghora, Korba Dist, CG State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT (S) / ORDER fS) / DIRECTION (S). ETC. ^^^^^ ^y;y\ ^!^ 1 \.i^y. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DB: Hon'ble Shri Justice I.M. Quddusi and Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Writ Petition (S.l No.2282 of 2010 Petitioner Kum. Manju Madhuri Bajpai versus Respondents State of C.G. and another g^ Present: Shri K.R.Nair, counsel forthe petitioner. Shri Vinay Harit, DeputyAdvocate General wjth Ms. Deepali Pandey, Panel Lawyer for the State/resppndenfs:::^:-':—^^ Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India ORAL ORDER (Passedon 6th May, 2010) Per I.M. Quddusi. J.: Learned counsel appearing for the parties are heard. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed with a prayer that similar order dated 1-4-2010, as has been passedin Writ Petition ^onaenis.' No. 1557/2006 and other similar writ petitions tied-up therewith, directing the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners taking into consideration the order dated 11-2-2010 passed by a Division Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court in Writ Appeal No.1188/2009, may be passed. 3. In fact, Writ Petition No.1557/2006 and other connected writ petitions were filed in 2006 and this Court directed the opposite parties to consider the cases of those petitioners, but learned Deputy Advocate General appearing for the State/respondents in the instant writ petition has submitted that the instant writ petition has been filed in ^^. . / •ts..,. ^ 1 3 '^m 1 l...C¥ .......^^y' &3 2010 itself and the petitioner was sleepingand onlyjust when she saw that this Court disposed of the aforesaid writ petitions filed in 2006,she approached this Court and it is settled law that the person sleeping for a long time should not be granted any relief. 4. However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to adjudicate this matter at this stage but we are leaving the matter for disposal at the discretion of the State Government. The petitioner may approach the State Government by moving a representation, which shall be considered and an appropriate decision in the discretion of the State Government shall be taken. It is also made clear that we have not considered the case of the petitioner on merits and also in view of the fact that she had not approached this Court earlier, she cannot be granted any benefit ofthe order dated 11- 2-2010 passed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court or on that basis passed in Writ Petition No.1557/2006 and other connected writ petitions. 5. The writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- I.M. Quddusi Judge Sd/- prashantKumarMishra Judge Gopal •^: u