1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi COMPANY APPLICATION NO.990 OF 2009 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.711 OF 2009 WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO.918 OF 2009 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.711 OF 2009. In the matter of Mahal Pictures Pvt.Ltd. Mr. Shandar K. Amrohi. ..Petitioner. V/s. Mahal Pictures Pvt.Ltd. & Ors. ..Respondents. And Kingstar Realtors Pvt. Ltd. ..Applicant. .... Mr. D.A. Athavale, for Applicant. Mr. Yaan Bhargavan, a/w. Mrs. R. Bhargavan, i/b. R.B. & Asso., for Respondents. .... CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 14TH OCTOBER 2009. P.C. On 9 th October 2009, when the matter reached before this Court, the petitioner and his Advocate were absent. The matter was, therefore, adjourned to 14 th October 2009. Advocate for the respondent was directed by this Court to inform the Advocate for the 2 petitioner that this Court will hear the petition alongwith the applications on 14 th October 2009, i.e. today, at 11.00 a.m. Despite receiving the notice, none appears for the petitioner. It is submitted on behalf of the respondent that the petitioner and the applicant are hand in glove and the petitioner is intentionally remaining absent because they want the application of the applicant to be heard prior to the admission of the petition. 2. The fact that the petitioner is aware that the matter is placed before this Court on 14 th October 2009 is also clear from the letter addressed by him to his Advocate dated 10 th October 2009 which is produced by the learned Advocate for the applicant. The company petition is therefore, dismissed on the ground of non- prosecution. In view thereof, company application also stands dismissed. [ S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. ]