1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 830 OF 2003 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 149 OF 1991 Gopal Vishnu Pawar ........Applicant versus Smt. Sushilabai Vishnu Pawar & ors........ Respondents. None for the Applicant Mr. A.B. Tidke i/b. P.D. Dalvi adv. for the respondent no.5. Mr. R.S. Datar for respsondent no.1. CORAM: A. P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 18th MARCH, 2009. P.C.: 1. The counsel for the applicant is absent. Heard the learned counsel for the respondent no.1. None for other respondents despite service. 2. By the present application three fold prayers are made : (1) for condonation of delay, (2) for setting aside abatement and (3) for bringing L.Rs. Of respondent no.2 on record. The respondent no.2 has expired on 7-2-1996, during pendency of the appeal and hence the present application has been moved. The learned counsel for the respondent no.1 has no objection for allowing the application. No other respondent has filed reply opposing the application. For the reasons stated in the 2 application delay is condoned, abatement is set aside. L.Rs. Of respondent no.2 are permitted to be brought on record. Cause title of memo of appeal be amended within two weeks, by bringing L.Rs. of respondent no.2 on record. Application is allowed and disposed of. (A. P. DESHPANDE, J.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY 3 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 831 OF 2003 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 149 OF 1991 Gopal Vishnu Pawar ........Applicant versus Smt. Sushilabai Vishnu Pawar & ors........ Respondents. None for the Applicant Mr. A.B. Tidke i/b. P.D. Dalvi adv. for the respondent no.5. Mr. R.S. Datar for respsondent no.1. CORAM: A. P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 18th MARCH, 2009. P.C.: 1. By the present application three fold prayers are made : (1) for condonation of delay, (2) for setting aside abatement and (3) for bringing L.Rs. Of respondent no.2 on record. The respondent no.3 has expired on 26-11-2002, during pendency of the appeal and hence the present application has been filed. None of the respondent have filed reply to the application opposing the same. The learned counsel for the respondent no.1 has no objection for allowing the application. No other respondent has filed reply opposing the application. Perused the application. For the reasons stated in the application delay is condoned, abatement is set aside. L.Rs. Of 4 respondent no.2 are permitted to be brought on record. Cause title of memo of appeal be amended within two weeks from today, by bringing L.Rs. Of respondent no.3 on record. Application is allowed and disposed of. (A. P. DESHPANDE, J.)