HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU W.P.No. 15725 of 2011 Date: 21-06-2011 Between: Guguloth Ganesh …………. Petitioner And The State of A.P., rep. by the District Collector, Warangal and others. …………. Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU W.P.No. 15725 of 2011 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 13-05-2011, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently, to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as Technical Assistant (Agriculture), Gudur Mandal, Warangal District as per the rules of the Andhra Pradesh Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme. 2. The brief facts that are necessary for the disposal of the present writ petition may be stated as follows: The petitioner was appointed as Technical Assistant (Agriculture) of Gudur Mandal, Warangal District, on 01-04-2006 under Andhra Pradesh Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme. However, in the month of December, 2006, the third respondent lodged a complaint at Gudur Police Station alleging that the petitioner forged a cheque leaf of the office cheque book and withdrawn an amount of Rs.24,465/- and further the petitioner was suspended from service. Basing on the complaint, the police registered a case in Crime No.194 of 2006 for the offences punishable under Sections 380, 468 and 471 of IPC and filed the charge sheet. After full fledged trial, the petitioner was acquitted of the offences with which he was charged. After the acquittal, the petitioner made a representation on 13-05-2011 to the respondents requesting them to continue his service as Technical assistant. As the respondents have not passed any orders, the petitioner filed the present writ petition. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that he was suspended from service on the ground that he forged a cheque, but the suspension order has not been served on him and further the criminal case registered against him was ended in acquittal and therefore, he made a representation dated 13-05-2011 to the respondents to continue him in service as Technical Assistant, but the same has not been considered. 4. Appropriate decision has to be taken by the second respondent- Project Director on the representation dated 13-05-2011 filed by the petitioner. 5. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent-Project Director to consider the representation dated 13- 05-2011 filed by the petitioner and take appropriate decision thereon within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. ________________ K.C. BHANU, J Date: 21-06-2011 YCR