IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9521 of 2008 MITHU SAH @ MITHU SAO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.5.2008. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 323,324,326,307,341/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner has a betel shop and it is said that the informant purchased one ‘Gutkha’ and paid a note of Rs.10/-to him which was torn which resulted in a hot exchange of words. On the next day, it is alleged that this petitioner is said to have fired on the informant causing grievous injury on his buttock. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to hot exchange of words one day prior to the occurrence between the petitioner and the informant regarding purchase of a ‘Gutkha’ . It is also submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner does not have any crtiminal antecedent and he has remained in custody since 25.6.207. Considering that the petitioner has completed one year in custody,I direct that the petitioner Mithu Sah @ Mithu Sao should be released on bail on or after 2.6.2008 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate,Begusarai in connection with Begusarai(Town)P.S.Case No.235 of 2007. U.K. (Sheema Ali Khan,)