THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO CRL.P.NO.1311 OF 2010 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondent. Evidently, petitioners 3 to 6 are residing separately and the 1st and 2nd petitioners are parents of the husband of the complainant. The reliefs claimed in D.V.C cannot be enforced against the petitioners 3 to 6 as they cannot provide maintenance or the residence. Therefore, in view of the above circumstances, the proceedings against the petitioners 3 to 6 cannot be said to be legal and maintainable and further they are said to be residing at a difference place. In view of the above circumstances, the Criminal Petition is partly allowed sofar as it relates to petitioners 3 to 6 and the proceedings against them are quashed. As against the husband of the 2nd respondent and petitioners 1 and 2 herein are concerned, the proceedings can go on. _______________________ N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO,J 21-07-2011 TSNR