[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.166 OF 2006 IN W.P.NO.2174 OF 1996 Sitaram Sonu Yadav ..Petitioner Vs. Bombay Municipal Corporation and Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.N.Engineer i/b Divya Shah and Associates for Petitioner Mrs.A.K.Savla Advocate for Respondents ... CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : JULY 7, 2006 DATE : JULY 7, 2006 DATE : JULY 7, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Considering what is set out in the Motion and the order to be passed, Motion allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) subject to the petitioner depositing in the account of the Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority a sum of Rs.1,000/- within four weeks from today. On such deposit, petition stands restored. On failure to deposit, Motion stands dismissed. If amount is [-2-] deposited, petition be listed on board for admission. Interim relief granted earlier to continue during the pendency and final disposal of the petition. On behalf of the Corporation, learned counsel makes a statement that they are not aware whether the structure is still in existence or not. [ F.I.REBELLO, J.] [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]