IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.49 of 2010 SUNIL KUMAR BHANDARI @ SUNIL PANSARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 3.11.2010 KHAN No one appears for the petitioner. The petitioner prays for quashing the part of the F.I.R. wherein his name has been included in the column of accused in Birpur P.S. Case No.1 of 2006 under sections 467, 468, 469, 471, 520, 120B of the Penal Code. The contention of the petitioner is that he was not posted in the office at the time of alleged occurrence. Counsel for the State submits that the instant case is of the year 2006 and if the petitioner has any grievance, he ought to have filed a representation before the Investigating Officer of the case or the Superintendent of Police of the District. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this court observes that if the final report/charge sheet is not already submitted under section 173(2) Cr.P.C., it would be open for the petitioner to make a representation before the Investigating Officer concerned regarding his innocence who will look into the matter in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ application stands disposed of. (S.P.Singh,J)