1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twelfth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.16047 of 2011 1.S.T.SUVAITHARAN 2.S.THANULINGAM 3.T.KALAISELVAM 4.A.SUGASHALINI 5.R.ARAVINTH ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. G.THALAIMUTHARASU Advocate For Respondent : MR. K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 498(A) of IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act in unknown Crime Number of 2011 on the file of the respondent police, the petitioners/accused have approached this Court for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the first petitioner is the husband of the de-facto complainant and other petitioners are only in-laws of the de-facto complainant. He further submitted that the petitioners have not committed any offence. 4.At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition in respect of the first https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 petitioner. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn insofar as the first petitioner is concerned. 5.Considering the fact that the petitioners 2 to 5 are in-laws of the de-facto complainant, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners 2 to 5. 6.Accordingly, the petitioners 2 to 5 are granted anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the concerned Judicial Magistrate and on each executing a bond with two sureties for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Nagercoil and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required; and the petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. sd/- 12/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, NAGERCOIL 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KANYAKUMARI AT NAGERCOIL 3 THE INSEPCTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. G.THALAIMUTHARASU Advocate SR.No.43338 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16047 of 2011 Date :12/12/2011 TR : 12.12.2011: 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/