IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.2070 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:25.03.2011. Smt. Veena Dahiya and another ...Petitioners Versus M/s Nikhar Herbal Beauty Point and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. S.S.Bhadana, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 14.01.2011 by which provisional rent has been assessed by the learned Rent Controller, Faridabad by assessing the rent of three months w.e.f. 01.11.2010 to 31.01.2011 @ `7,500/- per month alongwith interest and costs, total amounting to `23,500/-. The petitioners, who are the landlords, have disputed the rate of rent, but the learned Rent Controller has rightly observed that the statement of accounts produced by the tenants and the receipt issued by the landlords corroborates the rate of rent on the basis of which provisional rent has been assessed. The learned Rent Controller has also observed that the version of the respondents/tenants is more believable at this stage than of the landlords. Learned counsel for the petitioners has reiterated the stand taken before the learned Rent Controller, but has failed to impress this Court to disturb the impugned order. Hence, the revision petition is found to be without any merit and the same is hereby dismissed in limine. No costs. March 25, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE