'v OT THE HIGH GOURT OFJODIGATURE AT KGLASPUR CHHATTISGARH WKtT PB3CLTION N0. 3 ^ / OF 2005 psmiGsssKS 1II RESPONDENTS : yi. Smt. Ranjana Naik W/o Shri Pankaj Naik aged about 20 years , resident of Nawagarh, TahsU Janjgir District Janjgir Chamga (CG). r. Stnt. Bharti Choubey W/o Ramashanker Choubey, aged about 34 years, resident of Village Banari, DistriGt Janjgir Champa (CG). VERSUS l^ State of Chhattisgarh, Secretary Dep^rtment of Panchayat and Rural Develogment, D.K.S. Building Raipur (C.G.) y. The CoUector,Ja»jgirChampa(CG). •:!ai .: 3/ Chief Executive Officer, Janpad ' Panchayat, Nawagarh District Janjgir Chainpa (CG). WMT PETITION U/S ^26/227 OF THE 1. PARTICUI.ARS OF THE PETITIONER. tES"rll!1 C1i-^ ,.,^" <»ilt;t ^qTCT.'SlWti^ 7^ •<ii'4id*i, a-alwis, (si<Tii'ylj,< . Vv}.?. ^o.3&i?Vo$'•W^.200^ sn^i'tpR? ('^pfg^s?) ICN'BLE JUSTICs M Shri S.K. Tiwari. coun^ Shri AjayDwivedi, Dy. snn sandeep uuoey,!] Learned counsei app4 auestion of law involved her^ Karmi Grade-111 after aoDointrt there was irreguiaritv in the s4 This verv question carhs in Ku. Punam & others vs. (25 CQLJ 368 whiie aiiowint Court observed as under: • "22.Thecases of the seiectiod PiC? DSSH ?GU> including mass i^s'^can* ^aca% naving given subsequentlv, c ths candidats^ documents to 6i 23. AppSying facts of the prd nave aiready pr ^•f^r^/4l^4^'".^c- f^:i SI-ICAI i^-lt^^fctt.'^i.? IVl/1 appointments s candidstss coi-.'! scrutiny on accc <*i[2it^s^^ ^wv^ ^ ts(^t <r<*i^$i< iTaifinsnt^i . el for the DetitiOBer. f^ ft -?/'.?• *h^ GA^'i-, >>3.n. i^/i U Stt ^i.Cil.^;. ;ounse! tor resoonaent No. 4. 'aring for the petitioner submits thal in as to whether the services of Shii nent can be canceiled on the around lection orocess. up for. conslderation before th's State of C.G. & others reported in a the case of Ku. Punam feupra), t ths Ksha Court f.QG't this lon hand are not the cases of canceiiation process. the selection orocesses havs |ji vii.iai.CTu vi i c*\/iu>uui li. '•-'i <aiiy iisra^u'i* copying or mass irreguSanties. ! ne tr^i ^-vhAra ^ho ;snn/'Jr"S-m_o;ni- rTrlssris ^^tc.r Wi^^v^ tai.tS^-a ai. v t u...-;)^, .^i k.,/1 ettect to, naye oeen canceiiea |n discoverv of some facis that soms of i~/>/4 1 IWW =-s il^ywW-^.'i t^Uh/S 1 i;',.l,<3<-i ?/3 ] Ck."( i6()i-Pl? J^y^.^ &«i i'-a •tain tne appointments. the vi/eil settied pnncsples or la'w to tne <2ian& ^••sc^a's tS^:^. rjsic;n/^r)ri<an^'<2/*aurhnr^^i= ;iSDarea a secona seiect iist on me aasis of .the selectionls held eariier, On scrutiny. most of tne jsd piace in the sscond iist and thsir Ire continuin.g, as sucn. Some ct rne H r\^ i\n^ a n^r'f^ In ~h..& <;.Cir'ftrs^ |i?=t sff'o1- unt of doubtfully documents submitted by • •s-'^e-Hc^s .!„.. '>il~ •/ iiliS^I W TV a^ISII^ISTtlN; 'i-ie SF Tsf ":ii'4i<yi'ii, (9Ti1y<i<o, (°<diy^< 3II^T'<R^>' (13?T3^EI) —•2- them. It Is, therefor have nof found piac. an opportunity ot fn ithf; iina<;<s nf fha obtainrng appointn appointments made.1 One Kumari Aniuiata Ratri before this Hon'bie Court chal oassed bv CoSiector. Janjgir-Chal dlsposed of bv this Court bv ordei ths said writ petition this CourS ha; Learned counsei for the p| Detitioner is Identical to t'ne case impugned in both these cases ^ simiiar re!ief on the around of oari With the consent of the D^ disposed of in terms of the iudgri (S) No. 95/2008 (Ku. Punam & o1 also in terrns of the order dd 3848/2005 (Kumari Anjuiata R^ others). tt)|^[^4l-i 'RTR^ff "^f 'fe'^t t^t^R ^siRn sii^i e, directed that the candidates who 3 In ths second sslect list be aifordsd neanng to esta&iisn genusneness, d^r'-nm^n^ '^iihiTtift'Qrl hv ^h&rya fr^r on ine posis oetore tneir ieariier are canceiled." ore fiied writ petition No. 3848/2005 .enging the order dated 29.7.2005^ moa. The said writ Detition was also • dated 15.4.2009. Whlie disposing of observed : in vjew of wei! settSed principies of iaw, thls petitior stands dispossd o{ consequentiy, rvi.(V't| ^ l^ * .?:'^''s.yy« /t~I in lerms ai n.u. runotT; ^supraj. .)H. No. a.2UU8 stanas disposeci ot. ititioner submits that the case of the 3f Ku. Aniuiata ?SuDra) as the order re same and therefore he Dravs for "V. rties. the Dresent writ petition is also lent dated 14.3.2008 passed in W.P. hers Vs. Stats of C.G. & others) and ited 15.4.2009 passed in W.P.(S) thore Vs. State of Chhattisaarh Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge