IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 1843 OF 2009 WRIT PETITION NO. 1843 OF 2009 WRIT PETITION NO. 1843 OF 2009 Mrs. Kumudini Chandrakant Pethkar ] .. Petitioner Versus 1. Pune Municipal Corporation & anr. ] .. Respondents Mr. Uday Warunjikar for the petitioner. CORAM: S.B. MHASE & D.B. BHOSALE, JJ. DATED: 2ND FEBRUARY, 2009 P.C. : 1. The grievance of the petitioner can be redressed by giving directions to the respondent No.1-corporation to consider the representation made by the petitioner on 22nd January, 2009 before it, which is at Exhibit-L to the Petition. The stop work notice has been issued on certain grounds and the case of the petitioner is that those grounds are not applicable and, therefore, he has made the said representation. 2. The respondent No.1-corporation is directed to consider the said representation on its own merit after hearing the petitioner and after taking a site : 2 : inspection. The concerned officer who will deal with the said representation shall pass a speaking order, more specifically when the corporation rejects the said representation. While dealing with the said representation, the corporation shall not assume that we have considered the matter on merit. It is for the corporation to consider the matter on its own merit. 3. This exercise shall be completed within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the order by the corporation. A copy of this order shall be served by the petitioner on the corporation. 4. Writ Petition, accordingly, stands disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- [D.B. [D.B. [D.B. BHOSALE, J.] BHOSALE, J.] BHOSALE, J.] [S.B. [S.B. [S.B. MHASE, J.] MHASE, J.] MHASE, J.]