In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 7016 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: November 30, 2009 Lakhvir Singh .. Petitioner Vs. Usha Rani and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N. Jindal, J The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 5.11.2009 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Samrala. Learned counsel for the petitioner-defendant has stated that Parshotam Singh had died survived by Usha Rani widow, Pardeep Singh and Sandeep Singh sons and Madhu Rani daughter. The application was moved by Usha Rani etc. (i.e. all the legal heirs) to substitute them in place of Parshotam Singh and they were substituted accordingly. Now the petitioner has come to know that Sandeep Singh has not signed any power of attorney in favour of the learned counsel for the plaintiff and he has not engaged any counsel. Thus, he prayed for transposing Sandeep Singh as defendant. Heard. No matter Sandeep Singh has not signed the power of attorney, but this fact could be seen by the court at the time of passing of the judgment on merits. The petitioner could simply take the objection which could be settled at the final stage. Disposed of accordingly. November 30, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge