IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH JULY 2008 / 18TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 26864 of 2007(W) -------------------------- CP.34/2005 of LABOUR COURT, ERNAKULAM .................... PETITIONER: ------------ 1. DR.K.S. CHANDRAN,S/O.C.G.KUMARAN, 65 YEARS,R.C.M. HIGH TECH MULTI SPECIALITY HOSPITAL, THRIPPUNITHURA. 2. KHANTI CHANDRAN, ,R.C.M. HIGH TECH MULTI SPECIALITY HOSPITAL, THRIPPUNITHURA. BY ADV. SRI.R.S.KALKURA SRI.M.S.KALESH SRI.HARISH GOPINATH RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. N.RAJESWARI,JANAKI MANDIR, ELAMANA,AMBILI NAGAR,THRIPUNITHURA. 2. KUNJUMOL JOHNY,THEKKUM MATTATHIL HOUSE, P.O. MANEED. 3. USHA SIVAN,THAI PARAMBIL HOUSE, THEKKUMBHAGAM,.THRIPPUNITHURA. 4. MAYA RAJU, ALUKAL HOUSE, AROOR P.O. 5. C.K.RAMANI RAJU, PUTHUKKATTU VELLIYIL(H) S.PARAVOOR P.O., 6. BIJI M.A., SAJI, MELEPPARAMBIL HOUSE, KANJIRAMATTOM. 7. PREETHAMOL V.V., AMBANATTU HOUSE, THRIPPUNITHURA. 8. SHOBA A.C., KALANPARAMBIL, THIRUVANKULAM P.O., 9. SREEJA P.S., KADAPPATHU HOUSE, PUTHENCRUZ. 10. REMANI ELIAS, KARAKKATTIL HOUSE, THIRUVANIYOOR. 11. RADHAMANI M.L., MADAPPIL HOUSE, UDAYAMPEROOR P.O., 12. REMA GANGADHARAN, KHADHARI PARAMBIL, KARIMUGAL, THRIPPUNITHURA. 13. LABOUR COURT, ERNKAULAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. M.R. SABU. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 26864 of 2007 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 9th July, 2008. J U D G M E N T Counsel for the petitioners submits that counsel has already relinquished vakalath of the petitioners. 2. This writ petition was admitted on 19-9-2007 with the following order: “After hearing the matter for admission, I was not inclined to admit this writ petition. The learned counsel makes a plea that the petitioner may be given some time to pay off the amount as ordered in Ext. P3 order of the labour court. For that limited purpose, notice on admission is issued to respondents 1 to 12. Notice need not be issued to 13th respondent. Notice on admission by speed post. Post immediately after service of notice.” Process for issuing notice has not been paid. Since, almost ten months are over and the writ petition was admitted only on the question of granting time to pay, no further orders are also necessary in the writ petition. In the above circumstances, nothing further can be done in this matter and accordingly the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.