{ 1 } S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3572/1996. FAKIRCHAND AND ANOTHER VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. DATE OF ORDER : 25.02.2009. HON'BLE MR. GOVIND MATHUR, J. Mr. R.N. Upadhayay for the petitioners. Mr. Ravi Bhansali for the respondents. By this petition for writ, the petitioners sought appropriate direction for respondents to release all the Annual Grade Increments to them in the Pay Scale of Rs.350-570 and then in the Pay Scale of Rs.490-840 and then in the Pay Scale of Rs.950-1680. This Court on 10.10.1996 passed the following order: “Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. His grievance is that the respondents are not finalising the case of the fixation of the petitioners though they are feeling that the petitioners are entitle for the fixation, which they are asking for. It is expected from the respondents that within four weeks of this order being placed before them, they will decide upon the question of the fixation of grade and annual increments, for which the petitioners are stating their claim by a speaking order.” { 2 } In pursuant to the order aforesaid, the Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Raisinghnagar passed separate orders for the petitioner No.1 and the petitioner No.2 on 06.11.1996. By the orders concerned, all the fixation required were made and notional benefits too were extended. As such, whatever relief prayed by the petitioners has already been granted. Learned counsel for the petitioner has made an effort at the time of hearing that the respondents made a discrimination amongst the petitioner No.1 and the petitioner No.2 while releasing the Annual Grade Increments under the orders dated 06.11.1996. I am of the view that the discrimination, if any, made by the respondents in making fixation of the petitioners' pay, then that is required to be agitated by a separate petition for writ. In view of the fact that, whatever relief claimed by the petitioners has already been given, this petition for writ has become infructuous. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR)J. Anil/