BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty First day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.16594 of 2011 1. MURUGAN 2. SASI 3. ANAND 4. PUNITHA : PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KODAIKANAL POLICE STATION DINDIGUL DISTRICT. (CR.NO.662 OF 2011) : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. P.T.RAMESH RAJA Advocate For Respondent : Mr. K.S.DURAI PANDIAN Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are arrayed as accused and they prayed for grant of anticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C., for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 447, 427, 324 and 379(NP) of I.P.C. in Crime No.662 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.Heard Mr.P.T.R.Ramesh Raja, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal side) would submit in his argument that the petitioners caused damage to the tune of Rs.60,000/-. He would further submit that if for any reason, the petitioners are released on anticipatory bail, suitable conditions may be imposed. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I could see that the damage is caused to the tune of Rs.60,000/-, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kodaikanal and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kodaikanal and on further condition that each petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.15,000/-(Rupees Fifteen Thousand Only) to the credit of Crime No.662 of 2011 and on further condition that the petitioners 1 to 3 shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of three weeks and the fourth petitioner being a lady, she shall be available for interrogation as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 21/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KODAIKANAL. 2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KODAIKANAL POLICE STATION DINDIGUL DISTRICT. +1 CC to M/S. P.T.RAMESH RAJA Advocate SR.No.45108 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16594 of 2011 Date :21/12/2011 NSV/22.12.11/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/