W.P. No. 608 of 2004 (S/S) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Heard Mr. Tanuj Semwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Pankaj Purohit, learned counsel for the respondents. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to quash the charge-sheet on account of delay in completing the department proceedings. After perusal of the charge- sheet, I am not of the opinion that it is a fit case, in which the power under Article 226 of the Constitution be exercised. However, the Disciplinary Authority is directed to conclude the enquiry of disciplinary proceedings within a period of three months form toady. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Dt. 14.06.2004 G