IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18316 of 2010 PRAVEEN KUMAR MISHRA @ PRAVEEN KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 26.05.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make correction in the prayer portion. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner prays for bail in the case of misuse. Initially the case was registered under Arms Act in which the petitioner was granted bail and from 1995 to 2002 he regularly appeared in the court below. On 25.05.2002 petitioner’s bail bond was cancelled and ultimately he surrendered on 23.03.2010. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that he is the resident of Gorakhpur and due to default on behalf of his pairvikar , he could not appear and now he undertakes to appear regularly during the trial. It is also submitted that there is no other case against the petitioner. . Considering the aforesaid undertaking for appearing regularly during the trial, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari in - 2 - connection with Tr. No. 3141 of 2010, arising out of Motihari Sadar P.S. Case No. 204 of 1995. Learned trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner if he fails to appear physically on two consecutive dates. The trial court will try to conclude the trial expeditiously. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) BTiwary/