IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29914 of 2007 PRAHLAD SINGH, SON OF LATE FAKIRA SINGH, RESIDENCE AT GOVT. QUARTER, (CENTRAL SCHOOL), AIR FORCE CAMPUS, DARBHANGA, P.S. KEOTI, DISTRICT-DARBHANGA. ……………………………………………………………….PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. DINESH KUMAR SINGH @ LALAN SINGH, SON OF INDUDEO NARAYAN SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BUCHAMAN, P.S. SADAR, DISTRICT-DARBHANGA. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Amrendra Narayan, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhaya, A.P.P. For O.P. No.2 : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate. ------------- 3. 10.11.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned counsel for O.P. No.2 and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner through this application has challenged the validity of the order dated 17.3.2007 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, in Keoti P.S. Case No.98 of 2006, whereunder he has taken cognizance of offences under Sections 500 and 501 I.P.C. and has directed for the issuance of summons. Learned counsel for O.P. No.2, the complainant-cum- informant, has submitted that the charges have already been framed in this case and the recording of evidence is going on and in that view of the matter this application has become infructuous. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, I am in agreement with the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for O.P. No.2 that this application has become infructuous . - 2 - In view of this application having become infructuous, this application is dismissed. P.S. (Abhijit Sinha,J)