IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP-T No. 5851/2008 Decided on:14.6.2010 _____________________________________________ R.K. Jaiswal. …Petitioner. Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electronics Development Corporation Limited and another. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Praneet Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Additional Advocate General with Mr. R.P., Singh, Asstt. Advocate General for respondent No.2. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). It is stated by Mr. Praneet Gupta on the basis of instructions imparted to him that so far as the releasing of arrears and protection of pay is concerned, the grievance of petitioner stands redressed. This position is not disputed by the learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Accordingly, the petition has rendered infructuous and the same is dismissed having become infructuous. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 14.6.2010 *awasthi*