IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1451 of 2009(O&M) Date of decision: 4.9.2009 Harneet Kaur ......Petitioner(s) Versus Kanwal Kapoor and another ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Chawla, Advocate for the respondents. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) CM No.18690-CII of 2009 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. COCP No.1451 of 2009 At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents has stated that the respondents were directed to be present in Court, however, they have not come under the mistaken belief that since the order passed by this Court has been complied with, they need not be present. Learned counsel with vehemence, has stated that the order dated 13.11.2003 passed by this Court has been complied with. In view of the aforesaid stand taken by the learned counsel, the personal appearance of the respondents is exempted for today. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondents that the order dated 13.11.2003 stands complied with and since the petitioner has joined his duty as Lecturer on 1.9.2009, I am not inclined to proceed further in this contempt petition. Rule discharged. However, if the statement made by the learned counsel for the COCP No.1451 of 2009(O&M) -2- respondents is found false, the petitioner may file an application for revival of this contempt petition. September 4, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE