IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38269 of 2008 SANJIV KUMAR MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 8.12.2008 Heard Vivekanand Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. The case is under sections 397 and 395 of the Penal Code. The petitioner has been named as one of the accused persons, who had relieved the informant of his motor-cycle at gun point. The motor-cycle was subsequently recovered from the road side at a particular place. The contention is that the case is of false implication of the petitioner and that is the basis of the material collected in the case diary which indicates that a petition had been filed by the uncle of the petitioner against the cousin brother of the informant and since then the informant was looking out to implicate the petitioner and has falsely implicated in the matter. Let petitioner named above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M., Naugachia, in connection with Naugachia(Kharik) P.S.case no.189 of 2005. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )