IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10137 of 2010 TINKU @ TINKU KUMAR @ ARUN KUMAR, S/o Sri Shatrudhan Prasad. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.18725 of 2010 SATRUDHAN PRASAD, S/o Late Chhedi Ram. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04. 19.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 25(1-B) (a) (c), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution case is that the petitioners and other co-accused persons were arrested from the house of one Parvez Alam on suspicion that they were dealing with arms and arms were recovered from each of the accused persons. The antecedents of the petitioners are that they are previously accused in two cases of Arms Act in which the co-accused had disclosed that the arms had been purchased by them from the petitioners. In view of such, since there is a suggestion that the petitioners are arms dealers, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. The prayer for bail is rejected. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)