bsb IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 675 OF 2008 PETITION NO. 675 OF 2008 PETITION NO. 675 OF 2008 M/s.Sony India Pvt. Ltd. & anr. ... Petitioners v/s 1. Mr.Dattatray Nanasaheb Salunke 2. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondents Mr.A.P.Mundargi alongwith Mr.A.K.Jalisatgi and Mr. A. Shukla i/by M/s.Desai & Diwanji for the petitioners. Smt.Pallavi Divekar for the respondent No.1. Smt.A.A.Mane, A.P.P. for the respondent No.2 State. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 20TH JUNE, 2008 20TH JUNE, 2008 20TH JUNE, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C.: 1. The learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the Industrial Court had erred in not granting a stay of the process which was issued against the petitioners while admitting the revision. He submits that the petitioners would have no objection to have the revision application, which is pending before the Industrial Court, heard expeditiously. However, the order of issuing process be stayed during that period. 2 2. By consent of the parties, the matter is remanded to the Industrial Court. The Industrial Court will decide the revision within two months from today during which period the order issuing process is stayed. 3. Writ petition disposed of accordingly.