IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 818 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 80 OF 2006 MR. MAHABALESHWAR R. NAIK AND 10 ORS. ... Applicant Versus NARAYANDAS DAMODAR NAIK REP. THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS ... Respondent Mr.S.D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate for the applicants. Mr.Shivan Desai, Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- F. M. REIS, J. Date:- 2nd July, 2010 P.C: Heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the applicants and the learned Counsel for the respondents. 2. In view of the report of the Commissioner, the apprehension of the appellant does not survive. Nevertheless, Mr. Shivan Desai states that the respondents shall maintain status quo as of today, i.e the respondent shall not carry out any construction activity in respect of the suit house until further orders in the second appeal. 4. The respondents are at liberty to file appropriate application, for modification if so entitled. 5. The application stands disposed of accordingly. F. M. REIS, J. ap/-