•':"' Q *S< UBiJili' ! ^S ' ff;11' IBSJB^SI ':';':: IfiSSIf IH IHE HZGH COURT CF MADISA PB&BI^B^I J ALPUR^ Misc. petition NO. PETIIJCNSR: - ^-'~>'/.^..-c-^ ,' /.^•'^•A.-^t.S _of 198~57 c23~^-^^5f Rameshwar Singh son o£ shri Pooran Slngh ffar.i.har. Kanpal (Eorest Gaard) , Forest Office, Durg, Tahsil and District Darg, (M.P.) . VERSUS . • ; , , a --1"L g.'o W "!. (^9. RESPONDMTS:: -1 .State Qf Madhya Pradesh throcgh the secratary, D®partmentof Torest,.Bhopal 2.The sub Di.visional Officer, porest for Ourg sA> Oivi.sion» Duig, (H.-P.) . PETZCIffl UNQSR ART3EIt6S 226 & 227 CB' IHS CONSTIFUIiai OE 3NDIA. lisilfe, HIGH COIJRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIIASPUR V. P.IS.) No. 45 of 2005 Petitioner Rajiiesbwar Singh State of Madhya Pradesh and Others. Bene!x ; Hont>le Mr. Justice Satish K. AtSaihota?!. None appears for botli the parties. QRALQRD_ER (23rd August, 2006) The foUo^wng order of the Court is passed by Satish K. Agaihotri, J. The matter is cafled for 1'seai-ing thrice. On all the occasions, none appears nor any representatioD is made. °. In view of the abnve, fhe petition stands disiiaissed for want of pTosecution. » sati"s.'i S(t/- KAgi, e 9RSiSBBSiS ^B^iiSE