1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1507 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 1507 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 1507 OF 2008 Tarala Wadilal Doshi. .. Petitioner. vs. The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Nashik & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr. P.R. Arjunwadkar for Petitioner. Mr. R.D. Kane for Respondent nos.1 and 3. Mr. V.S. Masurkar, GP., for Respondent no.4. None for the persons who got the benefits. CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & A.A. SAYED, JJ A.A. SAYED, JJ A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE: 31ST MARCH, 2008. DATE: 31ST MARCH, 2008. DATE: 31ST MARCH, 2008. P.C. . The learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 3 tenders the affidavit in reply filed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Nashik. The same is taken on record. We are satisfied with the decision now taken by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Nashik i.e. withdrawal of the impugned order dated 27.2.2008 by his order dated 25.3.2008 copies of which 2 are annexed to the affidavit in reply. In view of the fact that the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Nashik has withdrawn the impugned order, the petition has become infructuous. The petition is dismissed as infructuous. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (A.A. Sayed, J.) (A.A. Sayed, J.) (A.A. Sayed, J.)