Q^: v-sss •f~ EG] OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, WRIT PETITION N0. /?YO/2005 te PETITIONER x> /A^ <%^ y^^ ^ "V-'' T C^ O.P. Awastliy, S/o Late Shri R.G.Awasthy, Aged about 50 years , Presently working as Accountant in the orfice ofthe Divisional Forest OfTice, East Raipur Dh'ision, District Raipur, C.G. R/o Bramhapuri, Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^ ^>^2^ ^w 7 ;y sy _/' .a^' ^ State of CUiattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department ofForest, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The CluefConservator of Forest, Govermnent of Chhattsigarh, Jail Road, Raipur, C.G. The Conservator of Forest, Raipiir Circle, Jail Road, Raipur, C.G. Shri G.P.Sharma, Accountant, Tlirough Office ofthe Conservator ofthe Forest, Raipur Circle, Raipur, C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE €X)NSTITUTIQNOF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI AND ANY OTHER WRITS. DIRECTIDNSOR ^ ^ri^ _. .-.. ^<^ ^OT-^\ f- " '-"^k. N 53'!-f 3. L. ;-,^...-.,\ II ^l' "^^,^v \ I jl ®f £'.;pS^^;^^"\<-1II &%\ S;is1^/^l /? £^ Cl4 •••WiW-fWS.Wf XI-HC-22 sn^r^ f^rwsn^r s Pf)Bf^tT ?$;: WSSW !^— } »awi"'" 3^ '<IWK'I<I, ®Tnw'i6,Ridiu^< Sll^l ^^eh Kltlril !ihW<h'ty^"i~(-{•°••••wq-^201 afl^lgWIWdfiff Shri Satendra Sanu, coun^el for the petitioner. Shri Bhaskar Pi'asi, Panel| The main grievance of thq post ofAccountant on 26.10.19^ on 1,1.1988, assuch, the peufic) promotion entitled for promofi^ respondent No.4. Therefore, 01 No.4 has been put above the pet order dated 12.4.2005 promotinj is arbitrai'y and illegal. Counsel for the petition^ petitionfer may be allowed to nia} in turn respondent No.2 be di) petitioner in accordance with 14 State has no objection. Hawng heard learned co| record and having considered tlt petitioner, the petitioner is allow| from today to respondent No,2 decide the representation of th4 from the date of receipt of the t^: by the petitioner in accordance fl With the direction aforesat Consequently, M.(W.)P. N^ Certified copy as per rule^ <til<iF<n<H-f t||t|<'l')'fffe'<'l <Rlt<K ^a.ri^q'an^r ILawyer for the State. ^ petitioner is that he was promoted to the |7, whereas respondent No.4 was promoted ber being the senior in terms of the date of !pn on the post of Head Clerk prior to [der dated 11.4.2005 whereby respondent jitioner in the seniority list is incorrect and respondent N6.4 by-passing the petitioner |r submits that in the circumstances the ^e a representation to respondent No.2 and icted to decicle the representation of the w, to which iearned Panel Lawyer for the -insel for the parties, having perused the limited request made by counsel for the ;d to make a representation vrithin 10 days tnd in tuiTi respondent No.2 is directed to petitioner within a period of two months rcler after considering all the points raisecl •ith law. .d, this petition stands disposed of. 1.1332/05 also stands disposed of. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo JUi ^lfl8>^i<a<t/ lili!