,.\ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI$GARH: BILASF’UR Writ Petiiion No.2é4 6f 2:362. Pet§tioner Gaya Prasad Gupta. 3/0. Late Shf; Mahadev Prasad Gupta, Retd, Sr. Cc-operative instrucwr, aged 61 years, riG,.Pici Ne. EWUS 647 MP Housma Board, indusiria? Area, Bhi§a§, Dis: Burg CG. Versus 1) Accountant Generai {A $5 f1}, Madhya Pradesh and C , Gvvaiior,(MP). Resnondents 2) Siaie of Chhattisgar‘n, Cc-opera€§V% Department i‘hrcugh Secretary, aipur, CG. $3: Hen’b1e $hri Justice $atish K. Agnihot‘ri Piesam: Smi. Meera Jai3wai, ¢oun$ei ¥o’r mg petifioner. Shri AS Gaharway. counsei for respondent No.1. ORAL GRS§R gassed on 43h May, gee?) This petition was flied f0.“ release of Provident Fund Wiih inferes‘i as ihe same was not paid tiii 19-1 -2002 i.e., tiii the petition was fiied. 2. The respondent no.1 in i'i's return categoricaiiy stated that the eniis'e GFF and other baiance amount to ihe tune of Rs.2,48.257l— inciuding interest has been reieased vide order dated iQ-5-2002 (Annexure R12}. 3. Learned counsei appointed by Legai Aid Commieee tried to .9 enouire about the fact of receipt of payment. According to ’net, she coutd not receive any instructions from the petitioner. Raju ;,A 4‘ In View of the categoricai siaiement made by respondent No.1 in its return, noihing survives in the ma€er‘ ‘x'hus, this peiitidn is accordmgw / * . sale ‘i disposed of. No order as to costs. Satish K. ‘Agoihotri\ /E “ ’- Judge. v-