-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRI. APPELLATE JURISDICTION W.P.NO.209 OF 2008 Mr.Gautam Ramesh Adhikari and Anr. ..Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents ... Mr.N.P.Bhavsar Advocate for Petitioners Mr.A.R.Patil APP for State. Mr.N.S.Parte i/b S.B.Prabhavalkar Advocate for Respondent No.5. ... CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : MARCH 10, 2008 DATE : MARCH 10, 2008 DATE : MARCH 10, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is about the medical negligence. Perused the affidavit. Affidavit filed by the State shows that the papers including the report given by the Tata Memorial Hospital were placed before the Dean, J.J.Hospital. The experts have considered the case papers and found that there is no negligence and therefore, police have not regsitered the offence. This is in -2- compliance of the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Jacob Mathew Vs. State of Punjab and Haryana Jacob Mathew Vs. State of Punjab and Haryana Jacob Mathew Vs. State of Punjab and Haryana reported in 2005(6) S.C.C.1. reported in 2005(6) S.C.C.1. reported in 2005(6) S.C.C.1. 3. In view of the above, we refrain to entertain the petition. 4. Petition is rejected. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [ S.B.MHASE, J.]