1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAQL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 490 OF 2010 Shri Ramdas Ganpat Sutar .. Petitioner Vs Shri Anant Babu Shigavan and ors. .. Respondents Mr. V.H.Shinde, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mrs S.D.Shinde, APP, for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE & A.R.JOSHI,JJ. DATE : 18/03/2010. PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. Mr Shinde, learned counsel for the petitioner, does not press this petition and seeks liberty to the petitioner to approach respondent no.5 for appropriate relief. It appears that the petitioner, after the order dated 4.3.2009 passed in the proceedings under section 138, made application to respondent no.5 dated 21.11.2009 seeking execution of the said order (order dated 4.3.2009). To that application, respondent no.5 has responded by issuing necessary direction on 22.1.2010 to the Deputy Engineer, Public Works Department, Chiplun, to take T 2 necessary steps for removal of encroachment. In view thereof, we do not deem it appropriate to entertain this petition and grant liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned authority, namely, respondent no.5, and Deputy Engineer, Public Works Department, for redressal of his grievance. If the petitioner approaches the aforementioned authorities, they may take appropriate steps in accordance with law expeditiously. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of as not pressed. (A.R.Joshi,J.) (D. B. Bhosale, J.)