IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 5TH APRIL 2011 / 15TH CHAITHRA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 2591 of 2011() ----------------------------- Crime No. 25/2011 of Kasaragod Police Station .................... PETITIONER/ACCUSD 1 TO 4&6 --------------------------- 1. PARAS @ PAROSH, PRADEEP, MEEPUKUZHI, KUDLU VILLAGE, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 2. KIRAN KUMAR, S/O.SIVA, KELUKUNDE, KUDLU VILLAGE, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 3. DINESH, S/O.JAYENDRA, MEEPUKUZHI, KUDLU VILLAGE, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 4. K.SUDHEER KUMAR, S/O.KRISHNA, K.C.COMPOUND, PACHIKKAD, KUDLU, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 5. ANJU @ AJITH KUMAR, S/O.RAGHAV, KEEZHUKUNDE, KUDLU, KASARAGOD. BY ADV. SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA SRI.ANEESH JOSEPH RESPONDENT(S): STATE -------------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-31. Public Prosecutor Sri.V. Manu THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/04/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. .................................................... Bail Application No.2591 of 2011 ..................................................... Dated: 05-04-2011 ORDER Petitioners, who are accused Nos. 1 to 4 and 6 in Crime No. 25 of 2011 of Kasaragod Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 324, 153 (A), 302, 201 and 120 B read with Sec. 34 I.P.C. seek their enlargement on bail. Accused Nos. 1 and 2 were arrested on 16-1-2011, A3 and A3 were arrested on 12-1-2011 and A6 was arrested on 7-2-2011. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners, the relative conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioner, the sentiments of the near relatives of the victim and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioners are released on bail, they will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioners making themselves scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. Dated this the 5th day of April, 2011. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) ani/