m 'sas Hiff-i coaR'r o? SUD'KJSSUKE AT BILSSPUR(CHH&TTISG^HI. WRZP PEO'CTION N0.. ^[ ) ''~2- i%^f61 ^^ r1'V«V S.A.Ali s/o Sa^yad Abaad, .c/o lralapara,Amar Qas Godam D»K*Sharma s/o L/Shri Ramadhar r/o Baniyapara,<Juaa B ila spur Distric-fc-BllaspurCC.G) J* K» Dubey s/o M.lrDubey, Kududand, 0'ain TallorsC-oppo) District-Bilaspur(C»G} A.K.Sharma s/o B/'P.P.Sharma r/o Kilaward, near Iilberary Districf-Bila spur(C.G} K.IM.Mighra s/o L/Jaganaa-th r/o Ghatxdih,near Masjid Dis-fc-BilaspQr (C.G) A.K.ShuKla s/o S.P.Shiriaa r/o Cha-t;idih,Ramayan Ghowk Distt-Bilaspur(C.G) A.K»Ven(ia s/o p*8.?erma r/o Vinobha Nagar,Lana Ho.3 Oayatri Mandir,Bj.laspur(C.G) D.S.Rajput s/o G. S.Sajput r/o Maagla^Maharshi School Road,Bistt^B ilaspur(C.G) 3.N«De(?angan s/o L/Banjulal r/o- c/o D.K.Sharma,Kilaward Juna Biiaspur,Bist-Biiaspur R* S.Saha s/p L/B.&.Saha r/o Yadunandan Nagar,Tifra Qr. Ho-,B-l5^Bilaspur(C.G} B.K.Dubey s/o U.R.Dubey r/o Kadudana,near B.B.L.s. School,Dis-tt-Bilasptxr(C.G5 Ku.Meena Rajak d/o Shivcharan Rajak r/o Gandhx Chow)E,near Laxmi- Talkies, Distt-Bila spur (Cl-G) ^Sf^: -^'1 •» 2 13 14. 15, 16v ^sS- A.K.Soni s/o I«/R«K»Soni r/o iJal3dapara,c/o Rr P«Upadhyay Bistt-Bilaspar(C.G) B.S.Son.i. s/o R.L.Soni r/o Chatapara,near residence of Badri Singb,Dis-tt-Bilaspur Mohan Iiat Sahu s/o Ii/B.R.Sahu r/o Knaharpara,31alapara, Distt-Bilaspur(G«G) Domait Lal Sahu s/o Ganesh Ram Sabu r/o Hatan Colony,H-2/21 . KSW Sarkanda,Bj.lagpur(GXS) Rajendra Kuraar Qewangan s/o Hanhe Dewaagan , r/o Sendrl Village, "'• Distt-Bilaspur(C.G) -He®ralal_Yaday "^ ~ -' - s/©I./Raiaa-.Zadav. r/o Masangaaj,;near- I'aay.-EoliG®- -3ta-tion.,'Distl;-Biias@u.HC.«.G) ?ideshiram Saha ~~~-—~—-— s/o L/Dunga.r-am Sahu r/o Chi.agrajpara,Ganesh Chowk Distt-Bilasplu: (C.G) VERSUS RESPONDSSI'S u 'i- 2;<7 3.^ State of Chhattisgarh through Secretar^'-yDepartment of Coo-oerafcive, Mantralay aaipur $C<G) Registrar^Copperative Society Chhat1;iagarti,Raipur (C.G) Liquidato.r in the matter oz Liquidatioa of Hagrik Cooperative Commercial Bank Iiimi'ted, ESole Bazar Bilagpur being- Assi.stant Regis-trar, Cooperative- Soci.ety,Bilaspur (C.G) pEICTIONJCTD^_&R^3iE._^22S_OF IHE CqMSTITUTION OP _I]^£^ FO& ISSUAKCE Q!?_ WRIS_IH THE HftIURE OF CS^5:'IOKARI, I^I^^lgS pROHlBl'riffli._&SB_Foa OTHBR SCTIT&BLE i-K£T._^;_MI£§^2S.ECSI^i OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER__OA_OR£HiS XI-HC-78 *ll*<ntSh*<|tb 'ssi '<ii<ii<'i<i, ®Tn«'is,RiciKiy ..fc}rf.-..d^.: ^200; Sli^i'i <<si«n ('i?rf3^Er) sn^r «KTR-ii* dWSll^iil **)i+ s^aiw (rf^cT 3:n^T qiiilci'fl-i ii*«nTffteiA<Ri«i< ^i3f1^IT3n^T 27.10.2006 Shri Manindra ShrivasN\ Shrivastava, iearned coilnsel Shri Sudhir Bajpai, learnj Shri Sunil Kumar Kuiuri, Chhattisgarh, Raipur(C. va, iearned Sr. Advocate with Shri Ashish forthe petitioners. 'd P.L. forState/resoondentsNo. 1 & 2. Registrar, Cooperafive Society', Govt. of p.) is present in the Court. ^Heard. The petitioners who wer Commereiai Bank Ltd., Gol Ba, as per the order of Reserve B; i reguiar employees of Nagrii'; Co-operative :ar, Bilaspur which is now under iiquidation ik of India, have filed the instant petition for iariK quashing and setting aside th<tir orders of termination dated 1.1.2001 of Annexure P/1 and have praye<j to absorb them in the Co-< Banks/Co-operative Institutiont for direction to tne respondents No:.. 1 & 2 Eive Department or with Co-operative agajnst the vacancies available in the ot)erat institutions. This Court vide order dd competent authority to expi' petitioners after examining the by 'them to the RegistFar,. orders. The Registrar, Co- vide 'nis affidavlt dated 31 Ju! him in compiiance of the order l4ted 24'" Septernber 2001 had directed the <>re the possibiiity to. rehabilitate these |r detailed'representations io be submitted )-operative Society and pass necessary oflerative Society (respondent No. 2 herein) !|/ 2002 detaiied the various steps taken by |dated 24[" September 2001 and submitted cb RTlO. XI-HC-78 *fTHipn SBfllW 7Sf ^iqi<i<i, aTflu'ie, Ricii^y *•'*»«•»**•*'»*'>'••****«* ^200 / 311^1 M^qi (l?f3g^T) 3ti^Tgir)^ri% gsiT sn^w awR> TOtTW(rfltT3TI^T •»>i<irn<fl-fWII<-]T ff te1^)' <Ri<^i< ^arl^R'sTi^r that aimost all the institutions to absorb/adjust the petition^rs dafss. have shown their Inabiiity or inconvenience annexing the repiies given on various • The petitioners vide thi (I.A.No. 341/2003) prayed for absorption of the petitioners a institutions indicated in the operative Society. ^ir appiications dated 11.12.2002/17.1.20C3 issuance of aDDroDriate direciions regarding ^ainst fhe vacancies in varic.us co-operative ^bove report submitted by Registrar, Co- On 1.8.2006 the submil forego their seniority', they m| lower post and that they wouj pay scale, was taken on recoi| thaf effect within a week an^ supplied to learned counsel f(| respondent authorities vyer. sympathetically and file app| 341/2003, appncation for is ;etitioners was dismissed as r|ot ision ofthe petitioners that they are ready fo !ay be absorbed on any post even on the Id not claim the place on the basis of fh.eir and they were directed to file affidavits to |i a copy of the same v/as directed to bs ^r the State/respondents No. 1 & 2 and 'ihe k directed to consider their affidavlts 1-opriate responss. On that date I.A.No. of suitable direction preferred by the pressed. ssuance P.T.O. XI-HC-78 *ll*l^rsh*lich d-°f'<<i<<ici<<, »Tfl«'i<»,Rioi'Hy ^/?;^.%....... X:)^ ^ 200 / 3n^?riraw (*icl^5i^sr) 3IT^T?iT^IRi craT3TR5Tsntii=ti W(ITW(ri?(T3n^T '»ii<tFii<fl-iHiidTffi3(^)'<Rit<iK ^isrf^iTan^T The petitioners filed af .The matter was agaih taken u| of counsel for the State four v;|i Governmeni to frame scherrji order.dated 1.8.2006 passed 1|> fidavits in compiiance of the above order. 5 on 1.9.2006 and on that date on the prayer seks' time was granted to faciiitate the State /take policy decision in compiiance of the iy this Court. The respondents have affidavit on record suDDOrted dated 9.10.2006 passed by re( The above applicatioi| Registrar, Co-operative Socie^ Learned counsel for respondents in compliance o dated 9.10.2006 whereby in Chhattisaarh Co-ODeratives i-egarding service conditions Karmchari Sewa (Niyozan, i filed IA.No. 10063/06, application for tsking |by an affidavi'; along with copy cf the order ^pondent No.2. is aliowed and affidavjt of the Deputs' |y istaken on record. |the petitioners submits that though the the order dated 1.8.2006 issued an ordei' Isxercise of power under Section 55 (1) s' ISociety Act, 1960, amendec' the r.iies. |3f the employees of Nagrik Sahkari Bsnk ^ibandhan Tatha Unki Kaiya isthithi) anc incorporated .a new rule 21|(9)(b) for rehsbiiitation of the retrenchec! empioyees and thereby rnadej is less than 50 years shail a provision that the employees whose age be eligibie against the advertisement fo' P.T.O. XI-HC-78 *Tfflrtt Sh*1iqi 'SSf •<11<IIM<4, t9Tn<rl'IS, Rtdl+iy Ad^. f( (<h ^ '\;1 ./ Wi; 200 / 3<i2i^l yaw (I^3^?T) 3n^r w 1^-ii.* dWSII^Tshliqi ?Riiw;Bl?a'3n^T qiiotll'lfl-f IPRff ff fS^S <R|«1< ^isif^rsn^r th^v recruitment issued by the eiigibiiity criteria ofthe adverti| matter of aDpointment but th4 not rehabilitated as per the( memorandum of Annexure R Sahkari Bank Limited, Raipur| they are initiating appointmen) yiew of the directions of this C'l On the other hand, leait submits that after hearing the| to file their response after con^ q;o-operative Banks and if they fulfili the ;ed posts, they sha!l be given priority in the ^y have not explained as to why they were eariier repiy particularly in view of the j/2-11 dated 19.1.2001 wherein Vyavasaik had communlcated respondent No. 2 that proceedings of all the 19 ex-employees in iburt. jned counsel for the respondents No. 1 & 2 Iparties this Court directed the respondsnts ^idering the affidavits to be submitted by ihe petitioner sympathetically an|d in compiiance of the same the polcy decision was .taken by the Govemment and accordingly the ruies governing the sep/ice conditio|is ofthe petitioners/ex-employees of Nagrik Sahkari Bank has been am^nded with a purpose to rehabilitate the petitioners. It is further subrr amended rules shall be giver Itted that 'all the eligibls petitioners as per •S.t-K- date of issuance of notificati vacancies advertised by the c<| direction issued by this Court ^ priority for a period of one year from the jsn amending the rules agains't the future ti-operative banks as per rules and thus, th-s |tands complied with. P.T.O. XI-HC-78 sn^rwR-ii.* cWTsn^awN? ^/f ^^ s~~ *11*lffTS»>*1iq» 3^ •<liq|ia«,®Tn«'l<D,lclclltiy . &L>-/^. <?-/% ^200 I 3ii^<i i<a«i>('ipI^yT) 6'WIWflftcT3n^?T 1 have heard learned COL This CourtWith a view 1 j'obs due to liquidation of thei explore a!l the possibilities to Co-Operative Banks/lnstitutionq the respondents have rnade al their rehabilitation and ultim^ scheme vi/hereby the eligible the advertised vacancies by ttli this Court. The direction dateB the consent of the parties .and| issued by respondent No. 2, tht accordingly, disposed of. 'oifFc'lffl-f WR?f ff fS^S (KlWi ^sri^Tsn^r |nsel for the parties. ]o rehabilitate the petitioners who lost their, |r banks had directed the respondents to f-ehabilitate the petitioners in various other and in compliance ofthe above directions |the endeavours to explore the possibility of jtely they have come up with a definite iletitioners have been given priority against |e Co-operative Banks as per directions of 1.8.2006 was passed by this Court with lin view ofthe notification dated 9.10.2006 i instant petition may be disposed of and is Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra , Judge P.T.O.