IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17713 of 2009 1. KAUSHAL KUMAR 2. Vimal Kumar @ Nippu Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 03.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners and their family members are alleged for making demand of dowry and non-performing the marriage even after accepting part of the agreed amount, while the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that demand was no where in the process of talk that also happened in between the complainant and the petitioners, father only to pressurize, this false case has been lodged but now petitioner no.2 and the girl are married elsewhere and no grievance remained at all. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Trial No. 56 of 2009 arising out of Complaint Case No. 548 of 2005, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Gaya subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)