IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI TUESDAY, THE 11TH AUGUST 2009 / 20TH SRAVANA 1931 LA.App..No. 595 of 2008() ------------------------- (LAR NO.3/99 OF SUB COURT, HOSDURG) APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------ STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KASARAGOD AT KANHANGAD. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LATHA T.THANKAPPAN RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANT ----------------------- 1. M.B.SAINABA, W/O.K.ABDUL KHADER, KOOLIKADU HOUSE, CENTRAL CHITTARI, P.O.CHITTARI, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARAGOD DIST. 2. KAPPANAKKAL NABEESA, D/O.ANTDUNHI, ILLIYAS NAGAR, PALLIKKARA VILLAGE. 3. B.R.D.C., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER FOR R1 THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ. ------------------------ L.A.A.No.595 OF 2008 ------------------------ Dated this the 11th day of August, 2009 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. This is an appeal by the Government and the judgment impugned is that of the reference court in an acquisition pertaining to Bekal Tourism project. Having gone through the impugned judgment, we find that the findings of the learned Sub Judge regarding the correct market value of the property at the relevant time is based on the evidence which was available on record. We also feel that it is more or less the correct market value of the property at the relevant time which has been fixed by the learned Sub Judge. We do not find any warrant for interference. The appeal will stand dismissed. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE dpk