IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.56262 of 2007 MD.SHAHWAJ Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 12.5.2008 Heard. This is a case under Sections 304B/34 of the IPC. As per the allegations the daughter of the informant died within seven years of her marriage and that 4-5 days prior to the occurrence the deceased had been assaulted by her matrimonial family members. Petitioner is the husband of the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is nothing in the case diary to connect the petitioner with the alleged crime. The father-in-law has already been released on bail by a Bench of this Court. The dead body of the deceased was found in the well, it is just possible that for attending the nature of call she had gone out of her house and met with an accident. From perusal of the report of the doctor it appears to be a suspected case of poisoning before drowning. Therefore, considering the relationship of the petitioner with the deceased, who was mainly responsible for the security of the deceased, I do not feel inclined to release the petitioner on bail. His prayer for bail is, therefore, rejected. However, it is observed that after receipt of the viscera report, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. DKS/ (Rekha Kumari,J)