1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 533 OF 2009 Mr Prafful S Tambe .. Petitioner Vs Mrs Preeti P. Tambe .. Respondent Mr.Sajal Biswas, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vijay Singh U Bali, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 20/07/2009 PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By this writ petition, the petitioner has impugned an order dated 17.10.2008 passed by the Family Court,Bandra, allowing the application filed by the respondent-wife for interim maintenance. By this order, the Family Court had directed the petitioner-husband to pay Rs.2500/- per month to the respondent-wife towards the interim maintenance from the date of the application. The only contention raised before the court challenging the order was that the respondent-wife has a business of Beauty Parlour and she is also earning substantial amount every month and, therefore, she is not entitled for maintenance. Except such an averment in the application and T 2 submission across the Bar, the petitioner-husband has not produced any material on record to substantiate his contention. A similar contention was raised before the Family Court and the Family Court, in paragraph no.5 of the impugned order, has rejected the contention for the reasons recorded therein. Considering the admitted income of the petitioner, in my opinion, the interim maintenance granted by the impugned order is reasonable and deserves no interference by this court in writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is disposed of. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)