IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 18696 of 2010 Date of Decision: 13.10.2010. Sunehari Devi widow of late Sh. Jai Bhagwan --Petitioner Versus H.V.P.N. Ltd. & another --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. J.S. Maanipur, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Advocate present in the Court has been asked to accept notice on behalf of Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate for respondents. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. The petitioner's husband was working as work charge T-Mate. On 26.8.1964 he met with an accident and suffered injuries resulting in amputation of fore-arm below the elbow joint and lower limb above the knee joints. On that account his services were dispensed with. The petitioner is claiming invalid family pension. The husband of the petitioner expired on 15.4.2003. Petitioner has served a legal notice (Annexure P-4) in this respect but no decision has been taken thereon till date. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if, respondents are directed to take decision on the legal notice served by the petitioner, referred to above. CWP. No. 18696 of 2010 -2- In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to take decision on the legal notice served by the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said respondent. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 13.10.2010. lucky