IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 10TH DECEMBER 2007 / 19TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 1762 of 2007(S) -------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.29651/2007 Dated 17/10/2007 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER ------------------------------------ V.OMANAKUTTAN PILLAI PRESIDENT, PERINAD LAKSHMI VILASAM VILLAGE SERVICE CO.OP. BANK. LTD. NO. 1841, KANJAVILA PO, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.N.MOHANAN RESPONDENT: RESPONDENT ------------------------------------------ OMANAKUTTAN, FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN AGED 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT CHAVARA JOINT REGISTRAR, OF CO.OP SOCIETIES (GENERAL) KOLLAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI M.P. SREEKRISHNAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- C.C.(C). NO.1762 OF 2007 IN W.P.C. NO. 29651 OF 2007 E -------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th December, 2007 ORDER By Annexure A1 Judgment, this Court had only recorded the submission of the learned counsel for petitioner that no orders are necessary in the Writ Petition, as the nomination of the petitioner has been accepted by the third respondent. The complaint in the Contempt of Court Case is that though the nomination was accepted and the petitioner stood for election and he was further elected as President of the Committee, subsequently proceedings have been taken to disqualify the petitioner. I do not see how an action in Contempt will lie. Moreover, counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner has already moved a Writ Petition against Annexure A2 notice and also obtained stay of Annexure A2. In such circumstances, I close this Contempt of Court Case. K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE kbk.