1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.9727/2009 Bihari vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 14.10.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA,J. Mr.NK Vyas, for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is challenging the award dated 8.8.2006 by which the petitioner's claim has been rejected by the learned labour court, Jodhpur. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner approached the learned labour court through the Union and union did not intimate about the progress in the case before the labour court and, therefore, the petitioner could not produce the evidence. It is also submitted that the labour union did not inform the petitioner about the award dated 8.8.2006, hence, there is no delay on the part of the petitioner in filing the writ petition to challenge the award dated 8.8.2006. The reasons given by the petitioner are not sufficient reason for filing the writ petition after delay of more than 3 years to challenge the award dated 8.8.2006. The contention 2 referred above itself show that petitioner himself was negligent and appears to have not in touch with the union and at least he was not in contact with the union for last 3 years as award was passed on 8.8.2006 and petitioner has preferred this writ petition before thie court in the month of Nov., 2009. In view of the above reasons, I do not find any reason to entertain the writ petition of the petitioner after such delay. Hence, the writ petition of the petitioner is dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA),J. cpgoyal/-