IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.17515 of 2011 J.C. Nandi, S/o late Narsingh Chandra Nandi, R/o Shivpuri Colony, P.O. Ishaque Chak, Bhagalpur Versus The State of Bihar Through C.B.I. ----------- 4/ 13.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the C.B.I. In the case Cash Credit has been increased from 80 lacs to 2.80 crores basing fake security as deeds for the property in security was owned by the Government. Bail is sought on the ground of petitioner’s bail with similar allegation in another case, vis. RC Case No. 23A of 2008 and in present case bail to lawyer having similar liability, both the grounds are vehemently opposed by the learned counsel for the C.B.I. on the ground that in R.C. Case No. 23 A of 2008 borrower was depositing the credited amount and in the instant case, lawyer’s liability is only to verify genuineness of the deed while petitioner’s liability is of physical verification of the land, though he is recommending authority but misdeed committed by him is apparent that government land has been shown of the borrower. In this case, Rs. 3.86 crore is borrowed by the co-accused, added by its interest. In my view, petitioner does not stand on footing of the lawyer (co-accused). Hence, his prayer for bail is rejected. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)