.°***A: ^ tlN^I c %^^^^'^^3i-J-;; 'TvffV. ^L-k.'t'i ' t?.?l-":";.U.!?.?-'->" .^--^^^s^" •y^y^" ^esEl A^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURB CHHATT1SGARH ATBILASPUR W.P.NO. I 2r>3 / 2005 Pet'tioner / .^ ^'0^: ^ <*' ^ (•\y ^.^ ^>°' •^' .ir Versus Respondents / 1. ^ •s^ ^ 39X%'/2- ^'3. 4. ^5. -^Smt.Uma Hidame Aged about 35 years, W/o Late Shri Ganesh Ram Hidame, Resident of Village - Chiladabri, Post - Marri, Tehsil - Mohla, Dist : Rajnandgaon-(C.G.) presently residing at Village - Mungesi Tola, Post - Kaudikasa, TehsU - Achowki, Dist : Rajnandgaon-(C.G.j State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretaiy Higher Education Department, Mantralaya at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Dist: Raipur-(C.G.) The Commissioner, Higher Education Department, Raipur, Dist: Raipur-(C.G.) The Collector, Dist: Rajnandgaon-(C.G.) State of Madhya Pradesh Through the Secretary, Education Department, Mantralaya at Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal, Dist : Bhopal-(M.P.) Union of India, Through the Prindple Secretary, Department of Personal & Training & Public Grievances, Shastri Marg, New Delhi WRIT PETITION U/A 226 / 227 OP THE CONSTITUTION OF INDtA XI-HC-22 31)^1 ^I R-ji'* 30^1 :SfrH ^l^fl H/- l^^f. Ei ^' .' ". ^g-afRRrq, •S^tWTS. 'fa?iTay iiiiiyff g»(ii% •OT%' ! , .w^G.....^i sil^l^giWHftg 23-3^006 ^ Shri Rakesh Anthony, counsel Shri V.V.S, Moorthy; Dy.AG. < the State of Chhattisgarh. Shri S.K. Beriwal, Sr.Panel Law^ Heard. - Leamed counsel for the petitionj was working as Lab Attendaiit, dlecj thereafter the petttioneri'appiied for cprj !t is further>submitted that in batc'n of the same question orders have beenp^ that similar orders may be passed in thij Leamed counsel for the.State that the State of Chhattisgarh has dependants bf those employees accordance with the policy prevalent at | in view of the submissions parties, without expressing any opinior) this Court, ends ofjustioe will be Chhattisgarh and the authorities petitioner in accordance with t'nepoiicy] husband. Ifthe petitioner fbuncl eligibl^ as possibie preferably. within a receipt/production of copy of thts brder.l co-operation to the authorities. With the aforesaid observationsi Certified copy as per rules. Cppy to the State counsei. whb mlade selved concet-ned p^riod ^rafeA tiFi^f'? fe^ ^siPtFTsn^r fi^r the petitioner, Shri Satish GufAa, Dy. Govt. Advdcate for jrer, for Uhion of India. ^r submits that the petitioner's husband, who during service period on IS^fiOOO and jipassionate appointment.whieh was denied. jsases tearing W.P. No.1322/2002 involying jssed by this Court on20-12-2005. He prays i& case also. poes not dispute the above fact and states ken a decision to oonsider the cases of died on or after 1-11-1997 strietly in thattime. . . by leamed counsel appearirig for the on tbe merits of the case, in the opiniqn of if a direction is given to the State of to consider and deckle the case of the prevalent at the time of death pf petitioner's ), appointment orders will be issued as early of tour months from the date of |The petitioner is aisodirectedtorenderdye this petition stands disposed of: Sdl- Fa ruddin judge [^^Rg^ ^-