IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3024 of 2007 RENU BEGUM, wife of Late Syed Turab Hussain Firdausi, resident of Nawab Bahadur Colony,m Nawab Bahadur Road, Police Station Khajekalan, District Patna .....Petitioner Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, Accountant General, Government of Bihar, Patna 3. Mr. Ashok Kumar Choudhary, Commissioner-cum- Secretary, Health Services, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 4. Dr. Deepak Tandan, Deputy Director, Health Workshop, Gulzarbagh, Patna 5. Mr. Hari Prasad Shah, Sub Treasury Officer, Patna City, Patna..... Opposite parties ----------- 07- 9/3/2011 Heard Mr. Syed Alamdar Hussain for the petitioner, learned Assistant Counsel to Govt. Pleader no.XI for opposite party nos.1, 3, 4 and 5, and Mr. P K Rajgrihar for opposite party no.2. This application under section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act has been preferred by the petitioner of CWJC no. 11979 of 2002 for the alleged disobedience of the order dated 5.5.2005, whereby the State of Bihar was directed to refund a sum of Rs.80,000/- , which was retained out of the pension amount of the late employee because he had, at the time of his superannuation, not accounted for the whole of the stocks in his custody and possession. The contemners have placed on record their show-cause. 2. We have perused the materials on record and consdiered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. The aforesaid CWJC no. 11797 of 2002, preferred by the late employee and the husband of the present petitioner, was allowed by order dated 5.5.2005, whereby the State of Bihar was directed to refund the sum of Rs.80,000/-. Aggrieved by certain portion of the order, the present 2 petitioner, being the widow of the late employee, had preferred LPA No.1400 of 2005, which was dismissed by order dated 31.1.2007, and the order on the writ petition remained unchanged. The State of Bihar has since refunded the sum of Rs.80,000/-, a position duly acknowledged by learned counsel for the petitioner. He, however, makes a grievance that the amount in question retained way back in 1999, has been refunded recently without any interest. He, therefore, prays for payment of interest. We regret out inability to accede to the submission for the reason that the order on the writ petition did not grant any interest. The present petitioner’s appeal was dismissed and no order was passed for payment of interest. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view that the orders in question have been complied with and nothing survives for consideration. 3. This MJC application is accordingly disposed of. mrl ( S K Katriar )