:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1507 OF 2005 Santosh Vitthal Kangude ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ... Mr.Jayesh B. Kocheta, for the Applicant. Mr.K.V. Saste, A.P.P., for the Respondent. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 24th March 2005 P.C.: . Heard Counsel for the parties. I see no reason to show any indulgence in favour of the Applicant having regard to the fact emerging from the record of the case that while on bail, the Applicant indulged in another serious offence under section 326 of the Indian Penal Code. Besides, he jumped the condition operating against him not to enter District Pune and :2: committed that offence while on bail. This by itself is a good reason to sustain the conclusion reached by the Court below in rejecting bail application preferred by the Applicant. Hence, dismissed. . As the prayer for bail is rejected, the trial Court is directed to proceed with the trial on expeditious basis as High Court Expedited Case. Applicant shall co-operate for the early disposal of the trial. In case the trial Court is of the opinion that the Applicant is causing delay in the trial, that opinion be recorded in the roznama, so that the same can be reckoned as and when occasion arises. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)