IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-13103 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 09, 2011 Kala @ Rishipal . ….Petitioner Versus State of Punjab … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Vimal Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) This is a petition seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 45, dated 27.02.2005, under Sections 406 / 420 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Sadar Ropar, District Ropar. Record reveals that petitioner was enlarged on anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 09.02.2006 in Criminal Misc. No. 6428-M of 2006. Record further reveals that after the investigation, police has filed challan under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before Crl.Misc. No.M-13103 of 2011 the Magistrate. Record further reveals that after filing of the challan before the learned Magistrate, petitioner did not appear for long six years and was declared proclaimed offender. In the opinion of this Court, if an accused is enlarged on anticipatory bail during the investigation and after filing of challan, if the same accused fails to appear before the Trial Court in compliance of the summons/warrants issued by the Trial Court, then the same accused is not entitled second time anticipatory bail, keeping in mind that he, who has violated the terms of the first anticipatory bail, is not entitled the extra ordinary discretion of this Court. Dismissed. May 09, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2