Cf^^cro 2—- IN THE HIGH COURTOFLCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S1 N0. "^02^ /2006 PETITIONER ..--•^^ ^^y... ^^%-"' \v- r:y ^ RESPONDENTS ^- Vipin Chand Paikara, Son of Shri Narrottam Rani Paikara, Aged about 36 years, Assistant Teacher, Govemment Girls Higher School Surangpani, Block Patthalgaon, District Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chliattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Deparfcment of Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. The Assistant Conim.issioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Head Office -T^\^^(C.(j.). 4. The District Coordmator, Tribal WeUare Departm.ent, Head Office- 3S^kPu-9-District3°<£k^i^2(C.G.). . 5. The Principal, Goverrtment Girls High School, Surangpani, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER_ ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION_ OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE QF _MAN_DAMUS, CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ^^^ ^^^. HKH COURT OF WHAmSGAW AT BILASPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE NR. SATISHJC^AQ (Ona. J. WRTT PFTTTION (5.1 N0.70^ OF 2006 ^ Petitioner Bharat Bhusan OadsBnu yersus Respondents State of Chhcrttiagarh and others WRTT PETmON (5.1 N0.7076 OF 2006 Petitioner Tarun Kunwr Chandrn versus Respondents State of ChhorMT<9arh ond o-thera wiar PETTTION rs.i NO.TDT/ OF 2006 Petitioner ManehaB' Lal Tiwuri versus Respondents : Staf of Chhattugnrh and oihers WMT PETmON (S.l N0.7078 OF_20Q(& ^ Petitioner Qnprnkash Jaiswal verais ResporKfents : State of Chhattiagnrh and olhers WRTT PETmON CS.) N0.7083 OF 2006 Petitwner Narangh RBrthiya vwsus Respondurhs State of Chhattisgarh and o-thers '^ Petittonw WRTT PETmON (5.1 N0.7084 OF 2006 V^»inChand Raa<ara wrsus Rcspondents State of Chhorttiagarh and olhers A PetrtionBr WRTT PFTmON fS.l N0.708S Ol8 2006 JuNidwr L<rf Yadw versus Re^ondents Stnte of Chhattisgorh and o'thers Petitioner WRTT PETmON fS.l N0.7086 OF 2006 Mnnnu Rom Rurtiiyo verais Respondents : Storte of Chhattiaigarfi and o-thws And wwrr pErmoN fs.ii>io.?wi<y 2006 Mitioner Kanhaiya Lal Sahu versus ,. Respwidents : Stnte of Chhdttisgarh ond olhers Pnssent : Mr. Arfwuni Shukla, counad fer •the petitiener(s). Mr. Suishil Oubey, Sovemnwnt Adwcate for •the Sttrte/ reapondents. OR O E R (Passed on Ihis 2011' cky of December, 2006) Leomed counsel a^eww^ for the petHioners as oldo for tfie State/respondents join+ly submit *at ihe f<Kts md questwn of kw involved in the present writ petitwns arc squarely covered by •the decision of this Court m -fhe case of Yadwwrt- KUIRW Wmwdwoj w. Mwrie^al Corporatlon. Oury ewd awthu^ . -(. 2. For •the aforementionad reasons, -the twit petitions are diaposed of m terms of •the decision of this Court' m •the matter of Yashwant Kumar ffMrodwaj (SufWtt), subjeet to vwification of •the fact aa to wihethw the petitioners hwe acquired B.Ed7B.TJ. Certificortea at their ofm expenses as per the circufars dorhed 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and fur-ther whether they have been paid Iwo advonce incrwnents or not. No order as to costs. < 3. A copy of -this order be placed on -the record of the conneeted wirit petitions. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge 1 2006CII)MPJR-C696 SiMuuh