w ^..-{^' rf^--' ^ "<;;'" THE HIGH COURr^"CHH&TTISG&RH A'S.'^g.ASPUR (d^.) 3S^-\ M.A. NO. /2004 - D.B. (Appeal against Order under section 104 read with Order 43 R.ule 1 C.p.C. valued at Rs 1,28,300/-). AppELLANTS DEFEHDANTS ^^ ^ 0<-'- /^v ,•" £VV ...->{M.- w^ ^••^•', "/ .'"'- '. //..s'''co' ^/y ^r<x- .° f-" .•' ^' '^ ><" .•' :^i. Arya pratinidhi Sabha, M.p. & ^ ; Vidarbha, Dayanand Bhavan, '. i Maharshi Dayanand Hargs; Mangalwa£|J| -1 Bazar, Nagpur Maharashtra ;-'' Tnrough : pradhan Nyashi. \ II Arya Pratinidhi Sabha, M..P. & ^ | Vidarbh, Dtirg Bhu-Sampatti, andl | Om Prishar, Advisory Committee 1 i Arya Nagar, Dhamada K.oaS. Durg , Through : Adhisthata Sbrii Harish Bansal. Ve r su s RESPONDEHT PLAJHTJFF Smt. Snehalata Yadav W/o Shri R.R. Yadav, 55 years, R/o Sbriram Colony i! Qakstiin Civil Line, Chhj.ndawada I-l.p. APPE&L UNDER SECTJON 1QA READ_WCTH_ORDER 43 RO&E I CGDEl OF CIVIL PRoCEDUy.E. 1908 (Amended Act. 20Q2) ASAINST THE ORBER QATED 0^^1-2004 E&SSBO BY LEARNED^^STRICT i J(JDGE,.IXJRG .IN CIVIL S@JT SQ. 5*A/2003 V&UJEB_AT 1 te_Ltl8,300/-. i Al II- :.; ^ ^.iu4t*dnni»i».j|ii ^^ •<ii'4i<n'si, »ti1<-ili<o, facii'yy ..<ffl^.ft,:..3..5-^,.,,.., s'l^t IPRT (^3^^) •'33ia?i qCT-Rah; •nqian^igniw 1 tt Brajesh TOTOT'nftt? 3^1 'qi)«<i<~]<I]-] TIFRTi ^ fe3t tFal^K ^sffin an^i 09/1Z/2W4;- Heard Shri Yashwant Tiwari Vimlesh Bajpai counsel for the respor; (jounsel for the appellants and Shri ident. thb This Court suggested to peculiar facts and cireumstances of of both the parties if the suit is months from the date of receiptof th^ directing the defendante to malntaji counsel accepted the suggestion oftltiisCourt dispose bf the suit wWhin a period respective counsel ttiat in fte Ihe case it woutd be in the interest dliposed of within a period of ttiree copy ofthis orderandalso ftirttier |n status quo !till ttien. Both the In vi®wofthis, there will be ?n order directm& the trial Courtto of three months ftom ttie date of rece'ipt of ttie eopy of this orcler. Till |then, the defendants shall maintain the status quo. Needless to mentjon that both the (arties shalt co- operate the trial Court in complyinjb with the above dh'ecttons of this order. The appeal stands disposed <ff. Parties are entitled Tor certifie<| copy of this order. s^- .. (^^^-