mm 13$ 2. W .7 ,’ w L...“ m mm fs¢m awrmm DB: Hon’bls 3usiics K. H. N. Kuranga, CJ. &. Hon’ble Justice L. C. Bhadoo, J. 20.6.2803 Pctitienem/Unian of India. by Dr. E Shailmdra Shukla, Advocate. Heard. The psmiencm/Union 0f India by %is 52etition under Aiiicle 227 9f £116 Constitution cf India have c-haEe-ngsd Admmisn‘ativa Tii‘ounal, Beach at Jabalpu' 3’2} pa§scd in Oriviml Applicatien No. 9} gamma! tha my against Haida Dnan P tkat thr: Enquuy Qfflcer has a1s0 actad as Officsr was appointed iii that depmimm natural §u3tice has baen Visiated and snquir the rasult {116 ordsr 0f 1'6mova1 ami 1‘educt I a ware quashéd and sat-aside. More over tho " ”sh? depzutmem Tmoo of Indm that 1f thev fwm the stace of apponnn‘em 01 the Prese oauei i0 the pefmonei s/Umon or .maa Hwmv heard learned counsel for 1h: $111: 13 Tmon has no ment and thew 1s no mi by the leamed Tribunal. We find no force in 5F.” I. K. Sl1u1da,.S1 Advocate wuh Sou ihe oi‘der oassed hy' Ehe Cemrai date-d 11th March 2962 (Aimexure 9 of ”000 by Winch 16am d Tribunal 11k (Respondem No.1) on the gound Preseming Officer as no‘Presentmg a1 enquiry thereby the principle of y on this grouiid stand vitiated and iv. on to the initial stage Armexure-A/l Tribunal has given the oppoltunity to )o want they can conduct the enquiry sting Officer; thereby no prejudice is petitionerswe are of the opinion that imity or illegality in the order passed this petition therefore it is dismissed. TV. m Sdl- Chief Justice l J it l Sd/- “ L.C.BHADOO Judge l l l l ‘i K ta