1 hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2833 OF 2006 Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak & Gr. Kamgar Union ... Petitioners Versus Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane Dist. & Ors. ... Respondents Mrs. Vaishali Bhilare for Petitioner. Mr. M.S. Topkar for R. No. 1. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED: DECEMBER 20, 2006 DATED: DECEMBER 20, 2006 DATED: DECEMBER 20, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . No appearance put on behalf of Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 though according to Petitioner Respondent have been served. . After considering the averments in the petition, the security guards whose names are listed in Exh. A and who have been applied for registration, respondent No. 1 to consider their application according to law and dispose of the same at any rate not latter than eight weeks from today. . In respect of the grievance against Respondent No. 2, if they are engaging security guards without being registered and or exemption, the Respondent No. 1 to take steps according to law. 2 . With the above observations, Petition stands disposed of. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)