N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR Singla gench WRIT PETITION N0. 21 3 é / 2006 S.L.Rathore S/o Late Shri B.L.Rathore Aged about 48‘ y€ars, f Junior Engineer Electrical Safety 85 Junior Assistant Electrical Inspector O/o Chief Electricallnspector, Raipur, Petitioner Responents : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through — The Secretary Energy Department, Raipur. 2. Chief Electrical Inspector / State of Chhattisgarh, 36/437, Barron Eazaar, Favara‘ Chowk, Raipur 3. The Secretary / CG. Public Service Commission, Raipur aéeg GLERK to WRIT PETITION U/A 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA A“ a. ETLASPUR I AT . .- %$ HKEH (EQURT CF JUDICATU‘RE AT BELASPLIF. (GHHATT156ARH) Wrét PetEiiQn No.2233 of 2906 3.1.. Rathore - Ver$us ~ Siate of Chha‘ttisgaa'h & Others Present: - O R D E R {Passed en 6‘“ September, 2006) SA'HSH K. AGNIHOTRL J. The petitioner was emp§oyed as Junior Engineer in the Energy Department of the State Government. Accorqmg to the reamed counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner became eiigibie for consideration for promotion to the post of Assistant Engineer in the year 2605. Name of the petitioner couid not be considered as admitteeiiy departmentai enquiry was pending against the petttioner. Learned counsei aopearing for the respondent/State submits that by order dated 15-5-2006 enquiry was conciuded and enquiry report was submitted on 7- 4-2GO6. it appears that in the enquiry, charge was found proved partiy. On the basis of enquiry report disciptinary authority byorc’ier dated 15-5-2006 (Annexure—Pl§) exonerated the petitioner with “warning”. Learned oounsei further submits that the case of the petitioner has been considered for promotion to the post of Assistant Engineer in the DPC held in the month of Aprii, 2606 in which a seated cover process was adopted in View of the pendency of departmentai enquiry against the petitioner. in View of the aforementioned, this petition has become intructuous on the ground that the case of the petitioner was considered in the DPC heid in the month of Aoréi. 2085 and deoision thereon has heen kept in the seaied sever. I r Mr. PrafuHa Bharat, Advocate: F0¥ the petitioner. ML fiatish Gupta, Deputy G.A.: For the State/respcndent No.1 & 2. Mr. Abhishek smha, Advocate: For respondent No. 3. Dr. NK. Shukia, Sr. Advocate w%t‘h Mr. AK. Yadav, Advocate: For the intewener. directed to open sealed cover and take 9bservedldecided by the departmental pening Respondents are accordinghj apprepr‘sate steps as a'eccmmended.’ committee. in the event, gr§evance of the petitioner still survives on re-o etitioner is at liberty t9 seek redressal of his grievances cf the sealed cover, the p before the appropriate Forum. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with the above stated tiberty. Parties are entitted for certified copy of this order. /\ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Barve a #L