1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.341 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.1487 OF 2005 Shrimati Gopal Wadkar and ors. ..Applicants Vs. Kalgonda Babgonda Patil and ors. ..Respondents ......... Mr.A.M.Kulkarni, for applicants. None for respondents. ......... CORAM: R.G.KETKAR, J. DATE : 30th APRIL, 2010. P.C. : This is an application for bringing heirs and legal representatives of respondent No.1B – Babasaheb Kalgonda Patil on record. It is reported that said Babasaheb died on 12 th August, 2008. The present Civil Application is filed on 31 st January, 2009. The office note indicates that the proposed heirs and legal representatives of respondent No.1B are duly served. Nobody appears on their behalf. 2] Considering the reasons set out in the application, I am satisfied that the applicants have made out a case for condoning the delay caused in filing the civil application and also for bringing the heirs and legal representatives of deceased respondent No.1B on record. 341-09.sxw 2 3] Hence, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (b), (c) and (d) with no order as to the costs. Amendment be carried out within two weeks. [R.G. KETKAR, J.] 341-09.sxw