:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.966 OF 2008 PETITION NO.966 OF 2008 PETITION NO.966 OF 2008 M/s Annaprabhu Caterers ..Petitioner V/s B.S. Pawar & Anr. ..Respondents Mr.Ramesh Dube Patil i/b Ajay Misar & Co for the petitioner Mr. R.V. Raghuvanshi,A.S.G. a/w Afroz Shah and Rui Rodrigues for the respondent No.1 CORAM CORAM CORAM : : : SRI R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR AND SRI R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR AND SRI R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR AND SRI SRI SRI A.A. SAYED, JJ. A.A. SAYED, JJ. A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 10TH JULY, 2008 : 10TH JULY, 2008 : 10TH JULY, 2008 P.C. 1. Heard. Undisputedly the agreement between the parties expired on 10th October, 2005. The clause regarding renewal of the earlier licence was to the effect that the same can be renewed on fresh terms and conditions as may be approved by the Welfare Committee and admittedly there has been no such approval from the Welfare Committee nor there is any document disclosing the extension of such original period beyond the period specified in the original agreement dated 30th October, 2005. Merely because, out of the good-will or pursuant to a licence by some of the officers of a government department, the :2: petitioner was allowed to continue his business in the Government premises that cannot create any right or interest in his favour so as to insist that he will continue to occupy the premises indefinitely or for a particular period as per the whims and fancies of the petitioner. Considering the same, as no right is created in favour of the petitioner to continue to renew the contract, no fault can be found with the direction issued by the respondent. The petitioner should cease to use the premises. In the circumstances, the petition is rejected. (R.M.S. (R.M.S. (R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.) KHANDEPARKAR, J.) KHANDEPARKAR, J.) ( A.A. SAYED, J.) A.A. SAYED, J.) A.A. SAYED, J.)