Court No.2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL. Writ Petition (S/S) No.985 of 2004. Kunwar Singh Negi ……. Petitioner Versus State of Uttaranchal through Registrar/Secretary, Cooperative Societies, Dehradun and others. ……. Respondents …………… Sri M.S.Pal, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Sukhdev Singh and Sri D.N.Sharma Advocate for the petitioner. Sri Paresh Tripathi, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand /respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 5. Smt.Beena Pandey, ld. Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos.3 & 4. Date: May 14, 2008. Hon’ble P.C.Verma,J. By means of this petition the petitioner has sought writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to give the benefit of revised pay scale of Rs. 1640-2900 to the petitioner from 1986 to 1995 and also to give other consequential benefits to the petitioner as per the government Order dated 22.10.2001, contained in Annexure No.8 to the writ petition. 2. The petitioner joined on the post of Stenographer in the office of Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Kumaun and Garhwal Division, Nainital on 01.04.1966. Thereafter he was given 2 promotion on 01.05.1986 in the pay scale of Rs. 515-860 by the Additional Registrar (Admn.), Cooperative Societies, U.P. On 28.08.1989 the State of U.P. / respondent No.3 revised the pay scale of the petitioner to Rs. 1400-2300 and the said pay scale of Stenographer has been mentioned at serial No.54 in the list appended to the Government Order dated 28.08.1989 which is Annexure No.2 to the writ petition. Again the pay scale of the petitioner has been revised from Rs. 1400-2300 to Rs. 1640-2900 and the Government of Uttar Pradesh has issued fresh Government Order dated 07.09.1995 in this regard which is Annexure No.3 to the writ petition. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that according to Government Orders dated 28.08.1989 and 07.09.1995, he is entitled for the revised pay scale of Rs. 1640-2900 from 01.05.1986 till 17.08.1995 but he is not being given the benefit of the said Government Orders. It is also alleged that despite several requests to the respondents, he is being deprived the revised pay scale of Rs. 1640-2900/- while his other colleagues of the department have been given the benefit of revised pay scale of the relevant period. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner confined his grievance that the writ petition may be disposed of finally with the direction to the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within a reasonable time. 5. The prayer is innocuous, deserves to be accepted. 3 5. The writ petition is disposed of finally with the direction to the respondent No.1 to consider and pass appropriate order on the representation of the petitioner dated 20.05.2004, contained in Annexure No.6 to the writ petition, within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. (P.C.Verma,J.) 14.05.2008 P.Singh