IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 4768 of 2010. Decided on: 2.12.2010. Surinder Mehta …..Petitioner. vs. State of H.P. & ors. …..Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr.M.L. Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr.J.S. Rana, Dy.A.G., for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr.N.K. Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.3 and 4. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ V.K. Ahuja, J. (Oral) The present dispute in between the petitioner and respondents No.3 and 4 is in regard to the timings for plying the bus fixed by respondent No.2 and it is alleged by the petitioner that the timings are not being adhered to by respondents No.3 and 4. The dispute is inter se the petitioner and respondents No.3 and 4 only in regard to the timings which have been fixed, as informed, by respondent No.2. The only question is if respondents No.3 and 4 are not adhering to the time schedule fixed by respondent No.2. 2. Therefore, respondent No.2 shall look into this question and see whether the timings fixed by him are adhered to by the petitioner and respondents No.3 and 4 as per his order. Copy of this order be produced by the petitioner before respondent No.2 for compliance. 2 3. In view of the above, nothing survives in the writ petition, which is disposed of accordingly, so also the pending application(s), if any. Dasti copy. Dec.2, 2010. (V.K. Ahuja), (tilak) Judge.