IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.23389 of 2010 Date of decision : 17.1.2011 Ranbir Singh SI and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Amit Khatkar, Advocate for the petitioners. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The petitioners have impugned the order of transfer Annexure P-1. Their grievance is that on an earlier occasion against the very same allegation levelled by the complainant and in an enquiry held by an officer of the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police the petitioners were exonerated but the complainant has once again raked up the same allegation and the petitioners have been transferred to Madhuban till the time the enquiry is over. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and have perused the impugned order and am of the opinion that the transfer of the petitioners, which is the cause of their grievance in the petition, is merely a temporary arrangement by which the petitioners have been sent to Madhuban in order to obviate the chances of their C.W.P.No.23389 of 2010 -2- interfering with the enquiry. In the given set of circumstances when the impugned order of transfer is clearly an administrative exercise lacking any mala fides, I am of the opinion that no interference is warranted. However, it is directed that the enquiry against the petitioners shall be concluded positively within a period of three months from today. Disposed of. 17.1.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss