IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 18978 of 2007 Between: S. Laxmipathi S/o Ashalu, R/o H. No. 1-4-209, Govindagiri Nagar, Koratla Post & Mandal, Karimnagar District 505 326. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, a Government of India Enterprises, rep by its Chairman & Managing Director, Registered office Bharat Bhavan, 4&6, Currimbhoy road, Ballard Estate, P.B.No.688, Mumbai-400 001. 2 The Regional LPG Manager, Bharat Gas, Bharat Petroleum Corportion Limited, No.1, Ranganathan Garden, Annanagar, West Chennai-600 040. 3 The Territory Manager, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Hyderabad LPG Territory, PO Box No.9 HCL Post, APIIC IDA, Phase-III, Cherlapalli, Hyderabad-500 051. 4 The Distributoriship Selection Committee, Hyderabad LPG, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, PO Box No. 9, HCL Post APIIC, IDA, Phase-III, Cherlapalli, Hyderabad-500 051. 5 Surakanti Srinivas S/o Venkat Reddy R/o Kothalapur Post & Mandal, Karimnagar District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order, direction or Writ more particularly one inthe nature of Writof Mnadamus or any other appropraite writ declaringthe action ofthe respondents in not awarding the LPG Gas Distributorship at Kathalapur, karimnagar District in favour of the Petitioner in terms of the advertisement dated 30-1-2004 andthedecision of the distributorship Selection Committee dated 17-1- 2007 is illegal, arbitrary and consequently directthe Respondents to allo the LPG Gas distributorship of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, at Kathalapur, karimnagar District in favour of the petitioner forthwith with all consequential benefits and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper inthe interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.G.VIDYASAGAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.O.MANOHER REDDY The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Petition. Permission is granted and the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ____________ G.ROHINI, J Dt.03.06.2009 PN/RNS