1 WP 5343/10 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5343 OF 2010 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. Sandesh D. Patil for the petitioner. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 20TH JULY 2010 P.C. : 1. By this petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 26 February 2010 rejecting the petitioner’s application (Exhibit-37) in the suit. The defendant made two prayers, viz. (1) to strike out the affidavit of evidence filed by P.W.2 from the record, and (2) to strike out the evidence in examination in chief recorded on an affidavit. The impugned order is an interlocutory order. Interference in the interlocutory order at every stage of the 2 WP 5343/10 proceedings would impede the trial. Suffice it to say that the petitioner can challenge the impugned order in appeal against the final decision of the suit if adverse to the petitioner. Consequently, no interference is called for in exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 2. The writ petition is accordingly rejected. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)