CRIMINAL MISC. M NO.12084 OF 2010 :{ 1 }: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISION: DECEMBER 15, 2011 Om Parkash .....Petitioner VERSUS Bimla Devi ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. Manish Kumar Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. S. K. Jain, Advocate, for the respondent. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The wife was allowed maintenance by the Magistrate, which order was upheld by the revisional Court. Against this the husband has filed the present petition. During the pendency of the petition, the husband- petitioner has died. Counsel for late petitioner submits that his salary was attached and now the question would be as to who would be entitled to arrears of salary and any such balance of salary. This issue is not relevant in the present petition. Right to balance of salary etc. has to be separately claimed. The counsel prays that he be given time to implead L.Rs of the petitioner to pursue the present petition. L.Rs of CRIMINAL MISC. M NO.12084 OF 2010 :{ 2 }: the deceased petitioner are not in any competent position to pursue the present petition challenging maintenance allowed. This petition would abate. Parties may separately contest their respective rights. The petition is accordingly disposed of. December 15, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE