IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.15372-M of 2010 Date of Decision:10.9.2010 Gurcharan Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. V.K. Sandhir, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed for issuance of direction to respondents No.1 and 2 to restrain respondents No.3 and 4 from harassing the petitioner and his family members at the instance of Balwinder Singh son of Gurmakh Singh, Gurmakh Singh son of Balwinder Singh, resident of village Kang, Tehsil Khadoor Sahib, District Tarn Taran. Upon notice, reply in the form of affidavit of Senior Superintendent of Police (PPS) District Tarn Taran on behalf of respondents No.1,2 and 4 has been filed. As per the said reply, the Antifake Travel Agent Cell called both the parties and directed and suggested them to wait for the decision of the Civil Court where dispute was pending. It is further stated that so far as the representation to DIG Border range Amritsar dated 20.4.2010 is concerned, it was never received by the Senior Superintendent of Police-Preet Pal Singh. However, as far as the legal notice through the counsel for the petitioner dated 30.4.2010 is concerned, the directions were given to the DSP Goindwal not to interfere into this Crl. M. No.15372-M of 2010 -2- matter as the Civil suit is pending between the parties. Accordingly, no further order is required to be passed. Disposed of accordingly. 10.9.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE