IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 22417 of 2008 Between: 1 Dhudekula Jandibeku S/o. Pitchaiah R/o. Mohiddinpuram Village, Arthaveedu Mandal, Prakasam District. 2 Ravulakollu Veeraiah S/o. Pedda Chenchaiah R/o. Mohiddinpuram Village, Arthaveedu Mandal, Prakasam District. 3 Chegireddi Chinna Kasireddy S/o. Kasireddy R/o. Mohiddinpuram Village, Arthaveedu Mandal, Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Principal Secretary, to Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2 Commissioner of Panchayat Raj, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 District Collector, Prakasam District at Ongole. 4 Chief Executive Officer, Prakasam Zilla Parishad, Ongole, Prakasam District. 5 Project Director, DRDA, Ongole, Prakasam District. 6 Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Arthaveedu Mandal, Prakasam District. 7 Special Officer, Indiramma Scheme for Arthaveedu Mandal-cum- Joint Director, Animal Husbandry, Prakasam District. 8 Mandal Education Officer, Bestavaripet Mandal-cum- 3rd Party Enquiry Officer for Arthaveedu Mandal, Prakasam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 5 in deciding to accept the list of beneficiaries for old age, widow and handicpped pensions submitted by 6th respondent for Mohiddinpuram Village and ignoring the lists prepared by respondent 7 and 8 who are competent authorities as illegal, irregular, without jurisdiction, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice, articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondnts to accept the list of beneficiaries submitted by the 8th respondent by including the names of petitioners 1 and 2 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following : O R D E R:- The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded, and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 10th June, 2009 bcj