IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 12956 of 2009 Between: 1 Marri Venkateswarlu, S/o. Samba Siva Rao, R/o. 3-73, Chinna Kakani, Mangalagiri Mandal, Guntur District. 2 Desaboina Sahadevudu, s/o. Appaiah, R/o. Chinna Kakani, Mangalagiri Mandal, Guntur District. 3 Marri Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Venkaiah, R/o. Chinna Kakani, Mangalagiri Mandal, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Chinna Kakani Grama Panchayat, Rep by its Sarpanch, Chinn a Kakani, Mangalagiri Mandal, Guntur District. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Mangalagiri Mandal, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3 Marri Samba Siva Rao, S/o. Srinivasa Rao, R/o. Chinna Kakani, Mangalagiri Mandal, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to pass any writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring highhanded action of the respondents in laying road in our sites is illegal, contrary to law, arbitrary and capricious and against to the principles of natural justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.KRISHNA MOHAN SIKHARAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.M.PRABHAKAR RAO The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: The writ petition is premature. It is directed against an oral statement by the 1st respondent that a resolution for laying a road through the petitioner’s property in the village (house site and an adjacent vacant space) has been passed. The petitioner asserts that no legal proceedings either for acquisition of the land or otherwise has been initiated. No formal proceedings or no overt action by the respondents 1 and 2 is asserted to have been taken for laying a road. The writ petition is thus seen to have been filed on the basis of a rumor in the village. As there is no cause of action, the writ petition is premature and is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J 1.7.2009. KRB. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION No. 12956 of 2009 Dated: 1.7.2009.