IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.968 of 2004 (M/B) Sarika Bhardwaj W/o Swami Nath, D/o Onkarnath, R/o House No. 291, Type 3, Sector 5, BHEL, Ranipur, Haridwar & another. ……. Petitioners Versus State of Uttaranchal Through Secretary Home, Secretariat Complex, Dehradun & others. …… Respondents Mr. Navneet Kaushi, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. D.K. Sharma, learned Government Advocate for the State. Coram:Hon. V.S. Sirpurkar, C.J. Hon. Irshad Hussain, J. (Per Hon’ble the Chief Justice) 1. Heard Mr. Navneet Kaushik, leanred counsel for the petitioners and Mr. D.K. Sharma, learned Government Advocate, who accepted the notice before admission on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3. 2. This is a very unusual writ petition seeking protection against the father of the petitioner No. 1 and the father-in-law of the petitioner No. 2 on the ground that he is not happy with the marriage, which is a love marriage. The fear is of an untoward incident because such incident had already taken place in past. 3. Mr. D.K. Sharma, learned public prosecutor promises to look into the matter and to instruct the concerned Police Station, accordingly, to afford adequate security, if necessary. 4. On that basis, the writ petition is disposed of. (Irshad Hussain, J.) (V.S. Sirpurkar, C.J.) 01.10.2004 01.10.2004 G