-1- :s. C^2 ^^sx IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSHGARH AT BODRI BILASPUR C.G. W.P. (S) No...^./6..........2011 PETITIONERS ^^y/ ^%^ '-7 •••f-^ y'i ~^y\^ '^''~,^"~ ^ ^~^? ^ <'"' ,y 1. Lallu Prasad Ratnakar, S/o Shri Adar Ratnakar, Aged 55 Years, Head-Master, Govt. Middle School, Anjeni Block Gourella, Bilaspur C.G. ^- • 2/6 2. Mohani Sankar Tiwari, ^^> Shri Sivebodhan Prasad Tiwari, Aged 59 Years, Head-Master, Govt. Middle School, Latkonikala Block Pendra, Post Pendra, Distt. Bilaspur C.G. RESPONDENS (1) (2) The State Govt. of Chhattishgarh; Through - The Secretary, Tribal a»d^WelfareDepartment D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Coramissioner Tribal aHd^A/elfare Department Bilaspur C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE As mentioned in the cause ti 02. PARTICULARS ABOUT THE RESPONDENTS; As mentioned in the cause title ,^;& s ^'. ,^^f.., li.-JIS^ >- v; ^ <i. HIGH CQU«aWCHHArnSGARH ATBBLASEUR WMT PETmON fS) No. 716 of2011 PETmONERS RESPONDENTS Lallu Prasad Ratnatar & Another. VERSUS , The State Govt of Chhattisgarh & Another. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihotei. J. Present: Sim ^ay Shrivastava, Advocate fbr the petitioaers. Shri P.K-Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer forthe State/respondents. ORDERfORAL) (Passedon 07th dayofFehruary,2011) 1. The petitioners were initiaUy appointed as Assistairt Teacher on a fixed pay ofRs. 100/-. After completion ofprobation period, they were yanted regular pay scale. 2. LeamediCounsel appearing for the petitioiMrs subniits that the issue involved in the case is asto whether, the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale vi.ef. the date of initial appoinfanent or after completion ofprobation period. 3. The issue involved, herein was considered by the Madhva Pradesb State Adnmustrative Tribunal, Jabalpu- in O.A No. 2745/89 (Madhidcant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State ofMJ'. & others), wherein it was held that the smiilarly situated teachers are entitled to reyalai pay scale w.e.f. the date ofinitial appointment. The matter vyas taken up to Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93. The said petition was disinissed by the Hon'ble SuprenM! 1 1^^^3'p""~^; ^ 3 ^sa-'' f ^::- '~? .rf';:' !tsS&.^g^^3^i 9. Court upholdmg the decision of the Tribunal to tiie effect that the Teachers/Assistaat Teachers are entitfed to regular pay seale from date ofmitial appointment 4. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners also subnuts that this court, while considering the same issue 'va.AmarSaiRam & others Vs. State of'Chhattssgarh & others [W.P. (8) No. 4725/2006] by order dated 01.09.2006, allowed the petitioners to make a representotion along wilfa copy ofthe petition and annexares within a period often days, raising all their grievances and in tura the eon(»medrespondent was directed to decide the represeritatioa ia an objective manner within a paiod of 30 days from the date of receipt of the representatlon. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are graated liberty to make a representation raising all their gpevances and m tum, fhe conoAned respondent is directed to decide the representation, if any, in accordaace wifh law, on its own maits, within a period (rf 8 weeks from the date ofreceipt ofthe representation. 6. In viewofthe foregoing, this petition is disposedof. Ne OTdter asto costs. Sd/- Satisb K. Agmhotri Judge Amit isn