IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.223 of 2008 Date of decision: December 22, 2008 State of Haryana ... Appellants Versus M/s Himwan Industries, Jullana & others ... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. Deepak Jindal, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Harsh Kinra, Advocate for the respondent. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J.(Oral) This appeal has been filed against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the Courts below decreeing the suit of the respondent challenging the notice Ex. P-1. Both the Courts below have found as a fact that the appellant-State was not able to establish its claim that the generator set had been sold prior to the period of 5 years. Learned counsel for the appellants has not been able to persuade me that the findings of fact cannot be held to be perverse or not arising from the material on record. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed. No costs. December 22, 2008 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE