AB 1701/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. GOSWAMI Heard Mr. D. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam, The learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam, has made available the case dia ry for perusal of the Court. The informant, who lodged the Ejahar, in her 164 CrPC statement, despite the atr ocities committed, condoned the wrong doings on the part of the accused persons. Since the informant had taken a conciliatory approach, keeping in view the rela tionship between the parties, I am of the considered opinion that the petitioner s be allowed the privilege of pre-arrest bail. It is solely on this consideratio n that the privilege of pre-arrest bail is granted to the petitioners with the e xpectation that the petitioners would reciprocate in equal measure the generosit y and magnanimity shown by the informant. Taking this view, it is provided that in the event of arrest of the petitioner, namely, Sri Kanak Nath, Sri Nilima Nat h and Sri Bhupen Nath, in connection with Tihu Police Station Case No. 46/2011 r egistered under Sections 498(A)/34 IPC, they shall be allowed to go on bail of R s. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) each with one surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the bail application is di sposed of.