!,1. SIKGLE StNi;?- ?M t^; IN THE HON'BLE HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISHGARH ATBILASPUR fC.G.t W.P. (S)No. ^f 3 33 /2010 Petitioner Awadh Ram Yadav, Aged 65 years S/0 Shri Fatte LalYadav, Retd. Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Arajkund Block Chhuriya, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Versus Respondents ^••' -f' 1. The State Govt. of Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Joint Director Kosh Lekha &Accounts, Ghadi Chowk,Raipur (C.G.). 3. District Education Officer, DistrictRajnandgaon (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Chhurya, DistrictRajnandgaon (C.G.) Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of writ of Mandamus/direction or any other aepropriate writ. , ^s^ ,-N.:'l/vi?"^?..-1 ^••"^'•^" .^^'f.'"':'fi:>'' -^•••^"•''^ •*/y" /T^ r^"^&, "%B!5 1,'^ftWI^, Ia)c1l+iy,< ^ } <A£> sn^i-q^pCipf^^;; •3)I^C%ll7TH? ! msntnwiN; ^aramteian^i SB : Kon bie Shri niar'inura moltan Siifjvasfaya, J. 10-08.2010 wqiOTN WRff •? fetat tfeSR Shri Somkant Verma, coun onri o<dusn <jups.ci, State/resDondents No.1, 3 and 4. neara. j nis case penains 10 gi i-earnea counsei appeanng TOI inai ine rnaiier rnav ue reTerr ne i niS ^/OUET;. in yv.r-.i\iu.' State of Chhattisgarti & o'lfiers] the Cornrnittee to consider the quesuuEi 01 rs^t^ vvere firvuiveu. State Governrnent, pui'suant to ^ w.r-.iMO.Isbi'Zuuo lofflt. f\eja of Cfifiatiisgarfi and others}, 0.4342/2GG4 {QsHnstss Msgi^ss ser nn.i-.^.i'MO.iuo OT zuuy i.siaw 01 MStfsCiSi SHCi SinOiH^f^ ' nUS, If iudgmeni ana order datect yV.r-.i\0.4o4z;^UU4 oiaiinau'i ivia counsei appeanng ror ine paiTies. i fiis peiiuoii is accoroinpiV oiTice OT ine Muvocaie uenerai ^es Tor ?ne Deisiioner. uovemmeni nuvocaie ror ine e'v'ance OT non-urani 01 reiirai aues. oeiiconer, on insiruciions. suDmiis !d to the nisri Po'wer Retirai Dues srau oin&r conn©ci8Qmsnsrs, oareciyu 'natter 01 reuial dues as the uisputed he Cornmittee »vas constituteu bv the iise OiUyi uaieu i^-uo-^uuo psi^^eu ^lianaraKat' vs. siiaie vsOVWTiinsnf fna oraer aaiea 'j^-o-^uuo passeu in ^nnawisgani afiu oifsers vs. tsaijiiSti is ueiiiion is SQusr^iv covereo DV in's sed in ifiai (supraj as suDiTiitteu Dy iearneu uisposea OTT in ine same rerms i.s., ine is directed to send the case to the >ira-FS.'I47—2/2niO—1,00,000. T' •SiI^IW omsn^n '3~5cT ^iiqKvj-ij,. ®iily<i<o,f»<(ii'Hy,< A.^.....^..?..^l.!^.;.....l'.s.5.1/..l, sn^i 'cpR7 ('^3^ti) ^^i^^ 'ITR^ff ^? I^St <^^i< ^sifOTa.n^t uornmiKee, 'witriin a penou uf lo QE iriis oruer. i nereaTier, ine L-ommii ano oTncers concernea wiinin a L-omniiiiee snaii consiQer and pys3 aTToruing proper opponun'iy OT nsq anu tne o»'icersconcsrneQ may lii^ i ne eniire exereise, inciuuing pa"; peutionef; De cofnpEeteci 'wsUiin a receipi OT copy OT iriis oraer. The petitioner shaii supply cj oia'ie counsei as 'w'eii as coung uansieiTing the sarne to the Comrni| iv's n'orn ine aaie OT r©cespiLOT copv 07 se shaii jssue nouce to fhe Detitionsr TUEinei" yeisuu 01 'io ^csv^. H'^ orasr, in accorQance VVILH isw, aner io ine peuuof'ier. i ne peuuoner aQQiiionsE ooGufnenis, 11 necesscarv. fmeni OT reiirai uues, ii any, 10 ine u^Etoa oi Tour rnutHns Korn ine osifei uf ne cornpieie sei or ine Deuuon 10 ine w Tor uie ftccuuni:ani ^er^eiGii i0) Liee. Sd/- i ManindraMohanShriva^av^ Judge