1^' -? -f6 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) WRIT PETITION (227) N0. <^M5 OF 2QW--ZQ \\ '-^ PETITIONER PLAINTIFF RESPONDENTS DEFENDANTS <c? _6^?^ ^w ^^y ^y/y .* •^r 1) ^2) 4) Dular, Son of Shri Ganpat, Caste- Marar, aged about 43 years, Resident of village- Jarwaydeeh, Tehsil- Kurud, District- Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS Smt. Bhana Bai, Widow of Toran Chandrakar, aged about 60 years; Kirti Bai, Daughter of late Toran Lal, aged about 44 years; Kamla Bai, Daughter of late Toran Lal, aged about 40 years; Nandni Bai, Daughter of late Toran Lal, aged about 38 years; 5) Premlata Bai, Daughter of late Toran Lal, aged about 36 years; 6) Mamta Bai, Daughter of late Toran Lal, aged about 34 years; -7) Neelsaroj, Daughter of late Toran Lal, aged about 32 years; Sheetal, Daughter of late Toran Lat, aged about 30 years; ls '~~i ^/9) Diwakar, Son of late Toran Lal, aged about 27 years; All respondents/ defendants No.l to 9 are resident of village- Jarwaydeeh, Tehsil- Kurud, District- Dhamtari, presently at Priyanka Colony, Kurud, Tehsil- Kurud, District- Dhamtari (C.G.) ^G^ ^-<l0) Rajkumar Nanda, Son of Shri Nemnath Nanda, aged about 70 years; Resident of Jagdalpur Road, Dhamtari, Tehsil & District- Dhamtari (C.G.) 11) State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Collector, Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari (C.G.) 12) The Sub-Divisional Officer, Kurud (The Ceiling Officer, Kurud) District-Dhamtari (C.G.) 13) The Additional Tehsildar, Bhakhara, Sub-Tehsil- Bhakhara, District- Dhamtari (C.G.) 14) The Revenue Inspector, Kurud, Tehsil- Kurud, District- Dhamtari (C.G.) 15) K.N. Dhruv, Patwari Halka No.l, Kachna, Sub-Tehsil- Bhakhara, District- Dhamtari (C.G.) WRFT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OFTHE CONSTTTUTION Q^INDIA -' E—78 sn^i^ifriN? ^^ 3ff^?T ^h^^. »n»)tfl**ir<<i ^s! -^wwi, ©til'H'is,f^(ni'9li,< _-vJ^"7J)......22^-Z../-! sn^l •VfV ('^{^S.q) Traiwwfei ai^i wiferaN •wwrf <r fezt-rfiregTC ^?3TfiTO31T^?I Hon'bte Shri Prashant Kymar 08.02.2011 Shri D.K. Vishwakarma, <j Shri R.R. Sinha, Panel M Heard. The Civil Judge Class -| dismissed petitioner's suit afte| Order7Rule11 ofC.P.C. Mishra, J. ounsel for the petitioner. iwyer for the State. il, Kurud, District - Dhamtari (C.G.) has r allowing defendants application under In view of law laid-dowiji by Hon'ble the Suprem®Court in the matter of Shamsher Singh vs.\ in AIR 1973 SC 2384, such an <i !n view of the legal po^ seeks permission of the Courl regular first Appeal under Sectic] Rajinder Prashad and others reported rder amounts to a decree. ition, learned counsel for the petitioner to withdrawn the writ petition and fiie 'n96ofC.P.C. Prayer aliowed. The writ petition is disnfiissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. Sd//- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge