IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.R.UDAYABHANU THURSDAY, THE 15TH FEBRUARY 2007 / 26TH MAGHA 1928 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 612 of 2007(E) ------------------------------ CRA.319/2002 of II ADDL. SESSIONS COURT, TRIVANDRUM CC.225/1999 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-II, NEDUMANGAD .................... REVN. PETITIONER/ APPELLANT/ACCUSED: ----------------------------------------------- ASHOK KUMAR, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O. VELAYUDHAN NAIR, SARASWATHY VILASOM VEEDU, MADANKAVU VADAKKUMKARA MURI, KARIPOOR VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN SRI.K.SATHEESH KUMAR RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: ------------------------------------------------- THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.M.KAMMAPPU THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.R.UDAYABHANU, J --------------------------------------------- CRL.R.P.No.612 of 2007 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of February, 2007 ORDER Revision petitioner is the accused, who stands convicted under Section 323 IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment till the rising of the court and to pay a compensation of Rs.2,000/- to PW1 and in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two months vide Section 357(3) of Code of Criminal Procedure. The appellate court set aside the conviction and sentence under Section 324 IPC i.e., to undergo R.I. for six months and convicted the accused only for the offence under Section 323 IPC and hence the appellate court has showed a maximum leniency in the matter. Considering the discussion of evidence contained in the judgment of the courts below, I find no reason at all to interfere. The revision petition is dismissed in limine. K.R.UDAYABHANU, JUDGE csl M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J S.A.No.709 of 1996 JUDGMENT 1st February, 2007