Criminal Misc. No.M-34898 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-34898 of 2010 Date of Decision : 25.07.2011 Hira Singh & another .... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL. Present : Mr. Karamjit Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No.1. Mr. Jagdeep Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. * * * * L.N.MITTAL, J. (ORAL) Hira Singh and his father Jagir Singh have filed this petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (in short, Cr. P.C.), for quashing FIR No.48 dated 12.04.2007 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 323, 324, 326, 34 of IPC registered at Police Station Kathu Nangal, Distt. Majitha, in view of compromise Annexure P-2 effected with respondent No.2-complainant injured Gurlal Singh. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file. Learned counsel for respondent No.2-complainant after seeking instruction from respondent No.2, who is also present in person in the Court, states that parties have effected compromise Annexure P-2 and therefore, respondent No.2 has no objection to the quashing of the impugned FIR. Affidavit of respondent No.2 to this effect has also been placed on record. Criminal Misc. No.M-34898 of 2010 -2- In appropriate cases, FIR can be quashed on the basis of compromise by exercising power under Section 482 Cr. P. C., even if the offences are not compoundable. It was so held by Full Bench of this Court in the case of Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007(2) Law Herald (Punjab & Haryana) 2225. It is stated that injuries relating to under Section 326 IPC are on non-vital parts i.e. right wrist and right leg. It is also stated that respondent No.2-complainant is the only injured person in the case. Parties belong to the same village. Compromise has been got effected by respectables. Accordingly, it is fit case in which FIR should be quashed, so that parties may live peacefully in the village. In view of the aforesaid, instant petition is allowed and impugned FIR Annexure P-1 is quashed along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom. ( L. N. MITTAL) JUDGE 25th July, 2011 'raj'