1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3367 OF 2001 IN FIRST APPEAL (Stamp) No.21567 OF 2000 The State of Maharashtra applicant vs Ramkishan Dagadu Kalaskar and others respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3369 OF 2001 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.21569 OF 2000 The State of Maharashtra applicant versus Ramesh Balasaheb Deshmukh and others. respondents Shri N.B.Patil, A.G.P. for the applicant-State. Respondents in C.A. No.3367 of 2001 absent although served. Shri B.A. Shinde, Advocate for Respondents in C.A. No.3369 of 2001. Coram : Shrihari P. Davare, J. Date : 27th August, 2010 P.C. 01. Heard learned A.G.P. for the applicant and Shri B.A.Shinde, learned Advocate for Respondents in C.A. No.3369 of 2001. 2 2. These are two applications preferred by the State for condonation of delay of 170 days caused in filing accompanying first appeals which are on stamp numbers, challenging the judgment and award dated 13.1.2000 rendered by the learned Vth Additional District Judge, Beed, in L.A.R.No.70 of 1992 and L.A.R. No.884 of 1989 respectively. 03. For the reasons stated in the applications, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily. It also appears that delay is not wilful, deliberate or intentional and, therefore, same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 04. Hence, applications are allowed in terms of prayer clauses (B) thereof and delay caused in filing the accompanying first appeals which are on stamp numbers, stands condoned. The said appeal be registered and numbered. Present applications stand disposed of, accordingly. (Shrihari P. Davare, J.) pnd/ca3367.01