IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17880 of 2011 Munna Yadav, S/o Bineshwar Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 25.10.2011 The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail as he apprehends his arrest in Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 462/2010 for the offences alleged under Sections 304 (B) and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is the husband of the deceased and it is seen from the First Information Report that the marriage of the petitioner with the deceased was solemnized in the year 2002 and there is allegation against the petitioner and other family members for demand of motor cycle as dowry. On 4.08.2010, the informant came to know that his daughter has been murdered, which has led to the filing of the instant First Information Report. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that apart from general and omnibus allegation against this petitioner and as such he should be granted on bail. Heard learned counsel for the State. Considering the seriousness of the allegations and considering that the petitioner is the husband of the deceased, this court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner at this stage. The bail application of the petitioner is accordingly rejected. Fahad. ( Vikash Jain, J. )