IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 28.3.2011 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition Nos.28517, 28518, 28519 and 28520 of 2010 W.P.No.28517 of 2010: to 28520 of 2010 EDAC Engineering Limited formerly known as SPIC Jel Engineering Construction Limited represented by its Chief Manager (Finance) N.Venkatachalam .. Petitioners in all the Wps vs. The Assistant Commissioner (CT) Saidapet Assessment Circle 3, Tank Square Street Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015 .. Respondent in all the Wps Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the proceedings of the respondent herein in TIN No.33346220369/2009- 2010, 2007-2008, 2006-2007, 2008-2009 dated 15.11.2010, while directing the respondent to pass fresh orders after affording reasonable opportunity to the petitioner to produce their books of accounts granting an effective hearing to the petitioners. For petitioner : Mr.N.Prasad For respondents : Mr.R.Mahadevan Additional Government Pleader (Taxes) C O M M O N O R D E R These writ petitions have been filed challenging the impugned assessment orders passed by the respondent, under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petitions, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the petitioner is granted fifteen days time to submit all the necessary documents to substantiate its claims, in respect of the different assessment years, for which the assessments had been made by the respondent, under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. He had also submitted that the petitioner would not seek for further time to produce the necessary documents. 3. The learned Additional Government Pleader (Taxes), appearing for the respondents, had not objected to such an order being passed by this Court granting time to the petitioner to submit all the necessary documents to substantiate its claims. 4. In such circumstances, the impugned orders of the respondent are set aside and the petiioner is granted fifteen days time, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, to produce all the necessary documents to substantiate its claims, to the respondent in respect of the relevant assessment years. On such production of the documents by the petitioner, the respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks thereafter. The writ petitions are allowed accordingly. No costs. Connected M.P.Nos.1,1,1, and 1 of 2010 are closed. Sd/- Asst.Registrar. /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar. lan To: The Assistant Commissioner (CT) Saidapet Assessment Circle 3, Tank Square Street Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015 4 ccs to mr.N. Inbarajan, Advocate, Sr. 21935 4 ccs to the Spl. Government Pleader (T),. Sr. 22093 Writ Petition Nos.28517, 28518, 28519 and 28520 of 2010 MS (CO) kk 30/3 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/