IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 173 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 173 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 173 OF 2004 AND AND AND CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 260 OF 2005 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 260 OF 2005 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 260 OF 2005 WITH WITH WITH CIVIL APPLICATIONS NOS.107 OF 2007 & 108 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATIONS NOS.107 OF 2007 & 108 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATIONS NOS.107 OF 2007 & 108 OF 2007 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 173 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3395 OF 2002 Mr. Sanjay Vitthalrao Ingale ... Petitioner Vs. Shri Mukundrao Ingale & Ors. ... Respondents CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 260 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3395 OF 2002 Shri Sanjay Vitthalrao Ingale ... Petitioner Vs. Shri Mkndrao Ingale & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Shrikant Yadav, Advocate, for Mr. Dilip Bodke, Advocate for the petitioner (in both matters). Mr. D.K.Bhalke, Advocate, h/f Mr. Vishwanath Talkute, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. (in both matters) Mr. D.A.Patil, AGP, for Respondents Nos. 3 to 6 (in both matters). CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 10th March,2008. DATE: 10th March,2008. DATE: 10th March,2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The learned Counsel for the petitioner makes a statement that the claim of the petitioner has been fully satisfied and the Writ Petition has been finally disposed of in view of this development. Therefore, he does not want to press these two Contempt Petitions. 2. In the result, both these Contempt Petitions stand disposed of without any further action. 3. As the Contempt Petitions are disposed of, the Civil Applications do not survive and stand disposed of accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)