CMPMO No.26 of 2004. 10.11.2009. Present: Mr.Ajay Kumar, counsel for the petitioner. Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for respondent No.1. Mr.Dinender Panwar, vice Mr.B.B. Vaid, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Mr.Vivek Thakur, counsel for respondent No.3. Mr.Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that this petition has become infructuous. He submits that the suit out of which this petition arises was filed challenging the appointments of respondents No.4 and 5 to the Governing Body of respondent No.3 Society. These persons are no longer members of the Governing Body of the Society and hence the petition has become infructuous. Therefore, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. In view of the final disposal of the main petition, all the pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Deepak Gupta), Judge. Nov.10, 2009. (V.K. Ahuja), (TILAK) Judge.