IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 5TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 34523 of 2008(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- N. VIJESH, NAGATHAZHE HOUSE, P.O. MOOYILOTH, VATAKARA. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, VATAKARA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C).No.34523 of 2008 P ------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of November, 2008. JUDGMENT The petitioner operates a regular stage carriage on the route Perambra-Kuttiadi via Mulakad, Moozhikode. According to him, the timings were last settled on 20.5.2005. He contends that due to subsequent events, a revision of timings is required. Therefore, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P1 application in this regard under Rule 145(7) of the Rules. 2. I heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader also. 3. The respondent is to consider whether Ext.P1 seeking revision of timings is maintainable under Rule 212 read with Rule 145(7) of the Motor Vehicles Rules. If it is found maintainable, then the petitioner's application for revision of timings shall, along with a copy of this order, be posted in a timing conference. Thereafter, the W.P.(C).NO.34523/2008 :: 2 :: respondent shall hear the objectors and take a decision on the petitioner's request for revision of timings. This shall be done within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (V.GIRI) JUDGE sk/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge