IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9861 of 2010 Kumari Rinku, wife of Bijoy Kumar, Resident of Village Harauli, P.S. Hazipur Sadar, District Vaishali…………………………………………Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The District Magistrate, Vaishali. 3. The District Welfare Officer, Vaishali. 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Vaishali. 5. The Block Development Officer, Block Hazipur, District Vaishali. 6. Kumari Munni wife of Sri Shatrughan Prasad Bharti, resident of village Harauli Panchayat Daulatpur, Chandi, District Vaishali. 7. Mira Kumari, wife of Jagadish Ram, Resident of village Daulatpur, Chandi, P.O. Harauli, District Vaishali…………….Respondents ----------- For the Petitioner: Mr. Praveen Kr. Agrawal, Advocate For the State: Mr. Manoj Kr. Ambastha, G.P.14 With Mr. Sanjay Kr. Pandey, A.C. to G.P. 14. 2 26.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is aggrieved by non- consideration of her case for appointment on the post of Vikas Mitra and appointment of respondent no.7. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that petitioner has remedy under the Guidelines. Under the Guidelines, petitioner has remedy by way of filing a complaint 2 in the matter before the Sub-Divisional Officer. From Annexure-6 it appears that the petitioner has already filed a complaint before the Sub-Divisional Officer, Hajipur Vaishali. In the circumstances, the writ application is disposed of with a direction to the Sub-Divisional Officer, Hajipur, Vaishali to consider complaint of the petitioner, issue notice to the parties and dispose it of by a speaking order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)