1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.1817/2008 with WP No.1689/08. M/s Bharat Trades through its Partner Ajay Dindayalji ..vs.. Maharashtra State Mining Corporation Ltd. and others. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, office Memoranda of Coram Court's or Judge's appearances, Court's orders or directions order and Registrar's order. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= CORAM: D.D.SINHA and C.L.PANGARKAR,JJ. DATE : 25th June, 2008. Heard petitioner-in-person and Mr. C.S. Kaptan, Advocate for respondent no.1 and 2. Mr. Kaptan, learned counsel, has submitted that these respondents have already issued advice of dispatch on 20/6/2008 whereby the petitioner in-person is intimated that he is entitled to collect 1525 metric tonnes iron ore from respondents no.1 and 2. Petitioner in-person does not dispute this aspect. However, he has submitted that there are other issues in the public interest which are required to be considered by this court and prays that direction be given to respondents no.1 and 2 to evolve the 2 comprehensive broad base policy for the purpose of sale/distribution of iron ore which would be equitable and free from aspect of discrimination. S.O.9/7/2008. JUDGE JUDGE. chute