IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9220 of 2008 RAMESHWAR PRASAD II Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3. 09.01.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The claim in this application is for regularization on the plea of an appointment on daily wages made on 1.7.1984 and uninterrupted continuance since then. The law with regard to regularization not being a mode of appointment and the manner in which such claims are to be dealt with now stands codified by the judgment of the Supreme Court in 2006(2) PLJR 363 (SC). The claim of the petitioner clearly falls under the discussion at paragraph 44 of the judgment. The matter is to be appropriately considered by the Respondents themselves if the petitioner fulfils the qualifications and conditions fixed therein. No positive directions can be issued with regard to the claim of the petitioner except for consideration of his case in accordance with the aforementioned judgment of the Supreme Court, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)