THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.3114 of 2006 Dated: 01.06.2010 Between: Kalur Joga Rao. .. Petitioner. and The Mandal Revenue Officer, Vemsur Mandal, Khammam District, And another. .. Respondent. ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief:- “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus by declaring the impugned action of the respondents in not following the due process of law as contemplated under the A.P. Telangana Area Tenancy Act and consequently direct the respondents to fllow the procedure as contemplated under the Act and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.” In the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition seeking the aforesaid relief, no specific cause of action has been mentioned by the petitioner and the relief is also very vague. At paragraph 4 of the counter affidavit filed by the 1st respondent, it is categorically stated that the petitioner submitted representation dated 02.11.2005 by registered post, but no relevant documents in support of his claim were submitted by him along with the said representation. Though no specific cause of action has been mentioned in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, having regard to the stand taken in the counter affidavit of the 1st respondent to the effect that except the petitioner approaching him with representation dated 02.11.2005, no relevant documents to substantiate his claim were submitted by him, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition as under: “The petitioner is directed to approach the 1st respondent-Mandal Revenue Officer, Vemsur Mandal, Khammam District, by way of appropriate representation with all necessary details enclosing relevant documents in support of his claim, and upon filing such representation, the respondents are at liberty to consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA,J 01.06.2010 v v