IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23985 of 2011 Mukesh Kumar Yadav @ Mukesh Kumar son of Jai Kishore Yadav, resident of Villae-Kakarghati, P.S.-Sadar, District-Darbhanga. ..................Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar ...............Opposite Party ----------- 02 12.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest, in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 372 of 2010, for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 326, 307, 504 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, is one of the named accused in this case. Submission is that there is no specific allegation attributed against the petitioner. Moreover, the dispute has been resolved by filing a petition for compromise, which is on record. If it is so and the informant by appearing before the Court below supports the factum of compromise with his free will and consent without any coercion and also stood as one of the bailors, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 372 of 2010, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with 2 additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for one year of till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Safik (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)