IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 19031 of 2007 Between: 1 Kanchuboyina Appala Naidu S/o.late Pydayya Door No.27-70 Appannapalem, Vepagunta Village, Pendurthy Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 2 Kanchuboyina Bangari S/o.late Ammoru Door No.27-72 Appannapalem, Vepagunta Village, Pendurthy Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 3 Nolla Appala Swamy S/o.late Kannayya Door No.27-7 Appannapalem, Vepagunta Village, Pendurthy Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority, rep. by its Vice Chairman, Visakhapatnam. 2 Dasari Sanyasayya Setty S/o.Late Somaraju R/o.6-85/1, Priya Gardens, Adavivaram, Visakhapatnam. 3 Dasari Satyanarayana S/o.Late Somaraju R/o.6-85/1, Priya Gardens, Adavivaram, Visakhapatnam. 4 The Hindustan Shipyard Co-op. Building Society Ltd., rep. by its President R.I. RAtnakumar, I &PE Dept., Badge No. 27-2-9742, Q.No.A-630, New Colony, Shipyard Quarters, Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in processing the layout application of 4th respondent in respect of inam lands in Sy.No.164/5C (part) in T.D.No.3146 of an extent of Ac.7.22 cents which is a mango groove of vepagunta village, Pendurthy Mandal, Visakhapatnam District as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the 1st respondent not to ﬁnalise the layout application of the 4th respondent in respect of the said property. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.P.SRI RAGHU RAM Counsel for the Respondents: MRS.(SC FOR VUDA)V.PREETHI REDDY The Court made the following Order: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.19031 of 2007 ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission as sought for is accorded. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ____________________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J Date:18th October, 2008 Note: Issue CC by Monday. B/o ghn To 1 Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority, rep. by its Vice Chairman, Visakhapatnam. 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KURR}