+- r' 1 $-* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 11+ w.P.(C) 13073/2009 & CM APPL No. 14063/09 LAL SAI HOSIERY ..... Petitioner Through:Mr. Amit Bhatia, Advocale VETSUS GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents <) Through: Ms. Renuka Arora, Advocate for DSIIDC. Mr. Sarfarz Ahmed, Advocate for Mr' Ajuy Aror4 Advocate for MCD. Ms. Zeenat, Advocate for Mr. N. Waziri, Advocate for GNCTD with t2+ w.P.(c) 1332112009 & cM APPL 1463612009 JAIN TEXTILES ..... Petitioner Through:Mr. Amit Bhatia, Advocate VETSUS GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Renuka Arora, Advocate for DSIIDC. Mr. Sarfarz Ahmed, Advocate for Mr. Ajay Atora, Advocate for MCD. Ms. Zeenat, Advocate for Mr. N. Waziri, Advocate for GNCTD with 13/ + _/W.p.(C) 13322t2009 & CM APPL No. 14637 /09, sr78ll0 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified {- ,''J 4 )0 ANIL KNITTING INDUSTRIES ""' Petitioner Thlough:Mr. Amit Bhatia, Advocate VETSUS GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Renuka Alora, Advocate for DSIIDC. Mr. Salfarz Ahmed, Advocate for Mr. Ajay Atora, Advocate for MCD. Ms. Zeenat, Advocate for Mr. N. Waziti, Advocate for GNCTD And + W.P.(C) t4029t2009 & CM APPLs 16075 129,1728/L0 DEEPAKHOSIERYFACTORY ..... Petitioner Through:Mr. Amit Bhatia, Advocate VETSUS covT oF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Renuka Aror4 Advocate for DSIIDC. Mr. Sarfarz Ahmed, Advocate for Mr. Ajay Arora, Advocate for MCD. Ms. Zeenat, Advocate for Mr. N. Wazfti, Advocate for GNCTD CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR ORDER ts.02.201.1 o !..- *j 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioners states that each of the Petitioners is willing to pay the amount as demanded by the Respondent No.2 DSIIDC and shift to the plois allotted to thern. Learned counsel for the Petitioners subrnits that no factory is being ru.n by them in the present premises under their occupation. The premises is being used only for office work. He accordingly prays that till such time they raise constructions on the newly allotted plots, the Petitioners should be pennitted to continue in the existing premises. 2. It is open to the Petitioners to approach the Municipal Corporation of Delhi ('MCD') with a representation for permission to continue their office work in the premises presently occupied by them. If such representation is made within ten days, the MCD will consider such representation in accordance with its current policy and take a decision thereon. 3. No fuither directions are called fbr. 4. f he petition is disposed of. Order be given dasti. FEBRUARY 1.5,2OII rk S. MURALIDHAR, J