IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3199 of 2009 Date of decision:28.05.2009 Anil Kumar Ahuja and others ...Petitioners versus Pardeep Kumar Arora ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KANNAN Present: Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioners. ----- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? K.Kannan, J.(Oral) 1. The revision is filed invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of Constitution of India to determine the provisional rent. Indeed from the records, it is not even seen whether the landlord has made such a request. On the first date when the tenant tendered the rent which according to him was due by him, the landlord received the rent under protest and he is in revision before this Court. 2. The procedure adopted leads much to be desired but still I direct the Rent Controller shall proceed to determine the provisional rent before taking up the rent control petition on merits, having regard to the claim by the landlord that the tenant is in arrears of large amount of rent. It is only desirable in such cases that the Rent Civil Revision No.3199 of 2009 - 2 - Controller makes adjudication as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. Civil Revision is disposed of at the stage of admission itself so as not to cause any obstruction for the conduct of the case before the Rent Controller. ( K.KANNAN) JUDGE 28.05.2009 sanjeev