SYK. kr,/, ";?r^'€'t- P*V! Gt'.',-'> ",. )N fv^. S3SWD-2S7QR{5a- ,.- .fWlEDINSCHffiULE OFTHE COURTFEES'ACTTsra' cs IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) REVIEWPETmONNo.?'0 /2010 APPLICANTS/ ^ RESPONDENTS 4 \.^^ ^^^5 ..^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, DKSBhawan, Mantralaya Raipur (CG) 2. The secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh Department of Finance, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG) ^ 3. ,6^ :^-- w°-^^-; ....•V" ^e.v ^ /' The Director General of Police, Police Headquarters, Raipur (CG) 4. D.I.G. (Administration) Police Headquarters, Raipur (CG) 5. The Director Treasury, Audit and Accounts Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG) VERSUS NON APPLICANTS/ PETITIONERS / 6. ,^" Pascal Ekka, S/o Shri Marcus Ekka, Aged about 48 years, Occupatio Subedar(M) Ravindra Ogale, S/o Late Shri 'T.M. Ogale, Aged about 41 years, Occupation Subedar (M) Smt. Indra Mukhtiyar W/o Late Shri Raghunath Aged about 50 years, Occupation Subedar(M) S.P. Shukla, S/o Shri S.N.P. Shukla, Aged about 50 years, Occupation SI(M) Egnasiyus Akka, S/o Shri Rafail Akka, Aged about 48 years, Occupation SI(M) L.N. Sharma S/o Shri S. B. Sharma, Aged about 47 years, Occupation SI(M) S.K. Shrivastav, S/o Late Shri R. K. Shrivastav, Aged about 54 years, Occupation SI(M) 8. Revaram Prajapati, S/o Shri Kaluram IPBa%,. 'i A "ft S^St "s tR ^»aW ;B ,y°;s"' ,y Prajapati, Aged about 45 years, Occupation ASI (M) 9. Ganeshram Gond, S/o Shri Sundar «- Lal Aged about 32 years, Occupation ASI (M) 10.. Smt. Shanti Ekka, W/o Shri Pascal '' Ekka, Aged about 44 years, Occupation Sl (M) ^. Harishankar Yahke, S/o Shri G.L. Yahke, Aged about 34 years Ocupation ASI (M) 12. N.K. Dubey, S/o Late Shri Balaprasad / Dubey, Aged about 54 years, Occupation ASI (M) 13. Lalmani Sen, S/o Shri R.K. Sen,Aged ^ about 43 years, Occupation SI(M) 14. K.G. Koshy, S/o Shri K.M. Johan, Aged about 42 years, Occupation ASI(M) 15. B.L. Yadav, S/o Late Shri J.R. Yadav, / Aged about 45 years, Occupation Subedar(M) 16, G.R. Dewangan, S/o S.R. Dewangan, y/ Aged about 36 years, Occupation Subedar(M) All the respondents are workina under the Police Head Qtr. (G.B.) Raipur C.G. APPUCATION FORREVIEW / RECALL OF THE ORDER DATED07th MAY. 2009 PASSED BY_TH£±ION'BLECOURT IN W.P.(S) NO'^801/2006, PASCAL EKKA & OTHERS VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND )THERS ^ />r"A£t ^•!«!»t, ff.""} § HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR REVtEW PETmON No. 20 of2010 \\^ APPLICANTS RESPONDENTS NON-APPLICANTS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. VERSUS PascalEkka&Otfaers. RESPONDENTS APPUCATION FOR REVIEW/KECALL OF THE PRDER DArED 07 MAY. 2009 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.fS) No. 4801/2006. PASCAL EKKA & OTHERS VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND OTHERS. SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnlhotri. J. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the State/ Petitioners. Sliri Prakash Tiwari, Advocate for the respondents. 9RDiER(ORAD (Passed on 22"'1 day of February, 2011) 1. The petitioners seek review ofthe order dated 07.05.2(X)9 passed in W.P.(S) No. 4801/2006 (Pascal Ekka & Others v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) on the ground tfaat the respondents (writ petitioners therein) are approaching the GoverameKt for fixation of their pay scale. 2. On perusal ofthe judgment and order dated 07.05.2009, which is sought to be reviewed, there is no direction for fixation of pay scale as the said issue was neither raised nor argued at fhe time of hearing ofthe writ petition, though a pleading was made in the writ petition. Thus, without pressing the issue as the same was given up during the argument, no decision on the question offixation ofpay was takea aad no direction has been issued. 3. The judgment and order dated 07.05.2009 is clear and does not adinit of any ambiguity and lurther, not capable of any other explanatioa ormeaning. 4. Ia view ofthe above, the review petition is disposed of SdA . Satish K. Agnihoc Judge Aimt