IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 8.4.2011 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.26233 of 2010 and Mp.P.No.1 of 2010 J.S.RAMYA [ PETITIONER ] W/O.MR.S.RAJISH REP.BY HER POWER AGENT MR.P.JAGANNATHAN Vs 1 THE COMMISSIONER CORPORATION OF CHENNAI RIPON BUILDING CHENNAI-3. 2 THE REVENUE OFFICER CORPORATION OF CHENNAI RIPON BUILDING CHENNAI-3. 3 THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER CORPORATION OF CHENNAI ZONE-VIII ARCOT ROAD VADAPALANI, CHENNAI-26. [ RESPONDENTS ] Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for records relating to the order of 3rd respondent dated 02.11.2010, Bill No.502, Ward No.114 given to occupiers notice under Rule 29 Schedule IV of the Chennai City Municipal Act IV of 1919 relating to the premises No.23/B-1, Mandira Apartments, B.N.Salai, T.Nagar, Chennai quash the same consequently directing the respondents to fix the Tax on par with other flats in the premises. For petitioner : Mr.A.John Britto For respondents : Mr.T.Mathi O R D E R Mr.T.Mathi, the learned counsel, takes notice for the respondents. 2. Though the prayer is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the third respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 22.12.2009, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. He had also submitted that no coersive steps would be initiated against the petitioner, pursuant to the impugned notice, dated 2.11.2010, till the disposal of the representation of the petitioner, dated 22.12.2009. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the third respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 22.12.2009, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of tweleve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation, dated 22.12.2009, to the third respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs. Connected M.P.No.1 of 2010 is closed. Sd/- Asst.Registrar /True Copy/ Sub.Asst.Registrar lan To: 1 THE COMMISSIONER CORPORATION OF CHENNAI RIPON BUILDING CHENNAI-3. 2 THE REVENUE OFFICER CORPORATION OF CHENNAI RIPON BUILDING CHENNAI-3. 3 THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER CORPORATION OF CHENNAI ZONE-VIII ARCOT ROAD VADAPALANI CHENNAI-26. + 2 ccs to Mr.N. Poovanaligam, Advocate Sr.24974 + 1 cc to Mr.T. Mathi, Advocate sR.25096 Writ Petition No.26233 of 2010 DM(CO) Eu 21.4.11 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/