D.B. SPECIAL APPEAL (WRIT) NO.619/2008 Meenakshi Sharma Vs. Sub-Divisional Officer, Bandikui, Dausa & Ors. Date of Order :: April 08, 2008. HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.NARAYAN ROY HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr. K.K. Sahu on behalf of Mr. V.S. Badhwar for the appellant. Mr. Samit Bishnoi for the respondents. *** Heard learned counsel for the parties. This appeal is directed against the order dated 31.1.2008 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition no.6953/2007 whereby and whereunder the writ application was dismissed. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that she was eligible for the post of Anganbadi worker but the authorities appointed the contesting respondent, Madhu Sharma on the post of Anganbadi worker ignoring her claim. It appears that initially the appellant was appointed on the post of Anganbadi worker but immediately thereafter, her appointment was cancelled by the authorities as she was disqualified to work as Anganbadi worker, and thereafter, the authorities took a fresh decision to appoint Madhu Sharma as Anganbadi worker in place of this appellant. It is not in dispute that the appellant was not fulfilling the mandatory requirements laid down by the State in the guidelines dated 15.9.2003. It is also not in dispute that contesting respondent, Madhu Sharma was otherwise qualified for the post of Anganbadi Worker. -2- The learned Single Judge of this Court, in this background, held the appellant-writ petitioner not eligible for the post of Anganbadi worker. The order cancelling the appointment of this appellant on the post of Anganbadi worker, at the same time, has not been challenged rather the appointment of Madhu Sharma, contesting respondent, is under challenge on untenable grounds. In view of the background aforesaid and the reasonings given by the learned Single Judge of this Court, no interference is required in this appeal. This appeal is accordingly dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ),J. (NARAYAN ROY),CJ. Skant/-