1 wp10662.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10662 OF 2010 _____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________________ Mr. K.J. Suryawanshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.V. Gaware, Advocate for respondent no.1. 1. Heard Advocate Mr. Suryawanshi for petitioner and Mr. Gaware for respondent no.1-Bank. Nobody appears for respondent nos.2 to 4 though they are served. 2. The award being executed by the respondent no.1- Bank specifically directs to adjust the amount of subsidy, if any, received by it on account of present petitioner. Learned Counsel for petitioner states that as the papers of petitioner are not being forwarded by the respondent to the authorities, that amount is still not received. Learned Counsel for respondent no.1 states that this is not correct position. 3. The petitioner is not in position to point out whether the Bank has received the amount of subsidy in relation 2 wp10662.10 to other similarly situated borrowers. 4. In this situation, the interest of justice will be met by permitting the petitioner to move appropriate and complete application before the Executing Court in accordance with law. 5. With that liberty, the present Writ Petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE. 13.01.2011 gas/wp10662.10