HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No. 4175 of 2009 O R D E R: Subject matter of dispute in this petition is a road, which is claimed exclusively by the petitioner as a private passage. On report given by the 3rd respondent and others, the 2nd respondent namely, Tahsildar, Pendurthi Mandal passed the impugned order dated 08-06-2009 under Section 147 Cr.P.C. preventing the petitioner from using the said road which was described as Public Road by the godown owners of Food Corporation of India authorities and directing the petitioner not to take possession of the said road until they obtain decree or order of a competent court adjudging them to be entitled exclusive possession. 2. Both the counsel reported that the 5th respondent filed OS No.576 of 2009 on the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam and also filed IA No.340 of 2009 therein for temporary injunction restraining the petitioner from interfering with the petitioner’s usage of the plaint schedule property therein, which is the disputed road and that the Civil Court by order dated 20-10-2009 granted interim injunction accordingly pending disposal of that suit. 3. In that view of the mater, the impugned order dated 08-06-2009 passed by the 2nd respondent/Tahsildar had worked itself out because the Tahsildar gave the preventive order only till a competent court adjudging the issue. 4. In the result, the criminal petition is dismissed as infructuous. ____________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J 08-10-2010 Mjl/*