IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION (C-482) No. 669 of 2011 1. Smt. Poonam Dhawan W/o Shri Manoj Dhawan D/o Shri Sushil Kumar Sood R/o 11/4 Chukhuwala, Near Guru Nanak Boys School, Dehradun (Uttarakhand). 2. Master Krishna S/o Shri Manoj Dhawan R/o 11/4 Chukhuwala, Near Guru Nanak Boys School, Dehradun (Uttarakhand). Applicant No.2 being minor is being represented through her mother and Natural guardian Smt. Poonam Dhawan i.e. applicant No.1 …..........Applicants Versus Shri Manoj Dhawan S/o Shri Kirti Kumar Dhawan R/o 68, Arjun Marg, DLF-1, Gurgaon. …………........Respondent Shri I.P.Kohli, Advocate, present for the petitioners. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. 2 Heard. (2) By means of this petition, moved under section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure,1973, the petitioners have challenged order dated 1.06.2011, passed by Principal Judge Family Court, Dehradun, in Case No. 180 of 2005, whereby said court has rejected application no. 246A moved by the petitioner before the trial court. (3) Brief facts of the case are that, petitioner no.1 Poonam Dhawan has instituted a case under section 125 Cr.P.C., against her husband Manoj Dhawan (respondent) for maintenance for herself and her minor son Master Krishna. It appears that the case is pending since 2005. The petitioner appears to have moved an application before the trial court to direct the respondent to file the details of the Bank Accounts and Life Insurance Policies. The trial court has mentioned that petitioner's evidence has already been recorded whereafter respondent has also been examined and cross examined. The trial court has further observed that the Income Tax return of the respondent is already on the record. In the circumstances, the trial court did not think it proper to allow application 246A and rejected the same. (4) In the above circumstances, having gone through 3 the impugned order, and after considering the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners, this court finds no illegality committed by the trial court. (5) Therefore, without expressing any opinion as to final merits of the case, pending before the trial court, this petition under section 482 of Cr.P.C., is dismissed summarily. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt.28.07.2011 N.P