1 APPLN-972.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.972 OF 2011 Vishveshwar Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit .... Applicant Vs. Pandhari Vaijnath Ohal & Anr. .... Respondents Shri I.M. Khairdi for the Applicant. Shri K.V. Saste, APP, for the State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: DECEMBER 14, 2011 P.C: 1. This is an application for leave to file appeal against acquittal of the respondent by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Solapur on the ground that the complainant failed to prove dishonour of the cheque, since the letter from the Bank which was produced did not bear the seal of the Bank. Ordinarily, the seal of the Bank should have been there on the letter of dishonour. If it was the case of the accused that the cheque was not dishonoured, nobody prevented him from depositing cash in the Court and finish off the grievance of the complainant. The view taken is 2 APPLN-972.11 hyper-technical. Leave granted. Admit. Call for the R & P.. Action under Section 390 of Cr.P.C. to follow. Needless to say, action under Section 390 means that the learned Magistrate may cause the accused to be produced before him by appropriate process and take security from them for their appearance in the Appellate Court. If the accused appear on their own, the learned Magistrate need not wait for the process to be issued or served upon the accused but shall admit them to such bail as he may deem fit. 2. The application accordingly stands disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)