1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1372 OF 2011 (Sau. Asha w/o Vitthalrao Garad and others vs. Sau. Harsha w/o Abhay Sharma and another) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri A.R. Rishi, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri M.P. Kariya, Advocate for the respondent nos. 1 and 2. -------- CORAM : R.M. SAVANT, J. DATED : JUNE 10, 2011 The above petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India takes exception to the order dated 21/1/2011 passed by the 3 rd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wardha by which application filed by the petitioners (Exh. 45) under Order I Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure came to be rejected. The petitioners sought to intervene in the suit filed for specific performance by the respondents 2 on the ground that they are co-owners of the property in question. Admittedly, the petitioners are not parties to the agreement in respect of which specific performance is sought. The trial Court on the said basis, has rejected the said application. In my view, the reasoning of the trial Court in rejecting the application cannot be faulted with. In that view of the matter, no case for interference is made out. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. JUDGE khj