IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARBITRATION ARBITRATION ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 21 OF 2005 APPEAL NO. 21 OF 2005 APPEAL NO. 21 OF 2005 IN IN IN ARBITRATION ARBITRATION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 392 OF 2003. PETITION NO. 392 OF 2003. PETITION NO. 392 OF 2003. Sunil Manharlal Gupta. ... Appellant. V/s. Rakesh Manharlal Gupta & ors. ... Respondents. P.M.Shah for the petitioner. Mrs.Anita R. Dhannuka for the respondents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. V.C.DAGA, J. V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 1st February 2006. 1st February 2006. 1st February 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Herd learned counsel for the appellant. . Having examined the impugned order, no case is made out to interfere with the impugned order. . The appeal is, thus, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, (V.C.DAGA, (V.C.DAGA, J.) J.) J.)