IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.2661 of 2005 Date of Order: 24.4.2009 Mukh Ram .....Petitioners Versus Bulla Ram and others Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present: Mr. Atul Yadav, Advocate for Mr. M.L. Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Jaivir Yadav, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Jasbir Singh, Advocate for Mr. Sachin Mittal, Advocate for respondent No.4. JASWANT SINGH, J (ORAL) On the last date of hearing i.e 31.3.2009, following order was passed: “As per office report, service of respondents No.5 to 7 is still awaited. Learned counsel for the respondents point out that in compliance of the impugned order dated 11.4.2005 passed by the learned Appellate Court, whereby on the application for leading additional evidence by respondent No.1-defendant, an additional issue had been framed and the learned trial Court was directed to submit its finding on the same, learned trial Court has since returned finding and submitted report before the learned Appellate Court on 14.3.2007, where the appeal is pending. Therefore, it is contended that the present revision petition has been rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to find out the factual position. Adjourned to 15.4.2009.” Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the present revision petition has become infructuous. Dismissed as having become infructuous. April 24, 2009 ( JASWANT SINGH ) manoj JUDGE