IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.4781 of 2007 Date of decision: 27.4.2009 Rahul Bhargava and others ......Petitioners Versus Bhim Singh Yadav and others ......Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Arun Jindal,Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Mukesh Verma, Advocate for the respondents. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral). The petitioners filed a suit for permanent injunction to the effect that defendants be restrained from causing any kind of damage or raising any sort of construction just adjacent to the walls and claiming mandatory injunction and other relief. Along with the said suit, an application for grant of ad interim injunction was also filed. The petitioners filed an application on 1.3.2007 under Section 151 CPC for granting permission for reconstruction of the wall from point C to D as per site plan and opening of closed ventilation from mark A to B. The aforesaid application was dismissed by the Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division) Rewari, for the reason that even the application filed by the petitioner for grant of ad interim injunction was pending before the trial Court. It is not in dispute that the aforesaid application for grant of ad interim injunction is still pending. The only objection raised by the learned counsel for the respondents is that the petitioners should file a fresh application after withdrawing this application. In view of the aforesaid assertion, the petitioners may move a fresh application before the trial Court who will consider the same in CR No.4781 of 2007 -2- accordance with law along with the application for grant of ad interim injunction. With these observations, the civil revision petition stands disposed of. April 27, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE