IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.56634 OF 2007 1. RAMJI SINGH, SON OF LATE DAROGA SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE HARPUR KALA, POLICE STATION MAJORGANJ, DISTRICT SITAMARHI 2. PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH, SON OF SHRI BANSHI MOHAN PRASAD SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PATAHI, POLICE STATION BAIRGANIA, DISTRICT SITAMARHI ………………………………………………………………………PETITIONERS VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SAHIDA KHATOON, WIFE OF KALAM ANSARI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PANCHTAKI BHADU, POLICE STATION BAIRGANIA, DISTRICT SITAMARHI …………………………………………………………………OPPOSITE PARTIES ********** 9 02/12/2010 In this case, cognizance has been taken against two Advocates, who are petitioners before this Court, alleging that they had identified the signature of Sahida Khatoon on a compromise petition, allegedly filed by her while moving for bail for Md. Zakrillah. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the bail was not granted to the said accused persons on the basis of the compromise petition, rather it was granted on merit. Counsel for the petitioners further submits that the enquiry has not been done in a proper manner. In cases such as this, the admitted thumb impressions along with the thumb impression under challenge should be sent to a Government expert to compare the two thumb impressions before this case is sent up for trial. At this stage, I am not inclined to interfere with 2 the order impugned. This application is accordingly dismissed. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )