1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2716 OF 2009 Prakash Dattatraya Chougule : Petitioner V/s. Ravindra Digambar Desai & Ors. : Respondents .... Mr.S.V.Sadavarte for the petitioner. Mr.A.S.Shitole, Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. .... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 16, 2010. P.C.: The petitioner takes exception to the order passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, dated 14.7.2009 in Criminal Revision Application No.100 of 2008 thereby allowing the Revision Application filed by the respondents herein. 2. A complaint came to be filed by the petitioner before the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Gargoti, contending therein that though there was an agreement between the petitioner and Doodhganga Vedganga Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. for supply of sugarcane, the said sugarcane was not cut in time and that though the petitioner had 2 registered prior to some other agriculturists, sugarcane of other agriculturists was cut prior to the sugarcane of the petitioner. The respondents are the Managing Director and other officers of the Karkhana. The learned Magistrate issued process. Being aggrieved thereby, the respondents-accused preferred a revision and the same was allowed. 3. A perusal of the impugned order would reveal that the finding of the learned revisional Court shows that the matter was purely a civil dispute between the parties and as such, the order of the learned Magistrate issuing process was not sustainable in law. Upon a bare perusal of the pleadings in the complaint and taking them to be correct on face value, it will clearly reveal that at the most, the claim of the petitioner could be for damages towards the said Karkhana. It can further be noticed that no allegations of any nature personally against the accused have been made in the complaint. 4. In that view of the matter, no fault can be found with the view taken by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge. Criminal Writ Petition is dismissed. B. R. GAVAI, J.