IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 814 OF 2009 M/s. Paradise and Bhoomi Developers and Ors. ... Petitioners. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents. Mr. A.M.Saraogi Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. I. Calcuttawala AGP Advocate for the State. Ms. Geeta Joglekar Advocate for the BMC. Mr. Pratap Singh Advocate for respondent No. 4. CORAM CORAM CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & A.A. A.A. A.A. SAYED, J. SAYED, J. SAYED, J. DATE DATE DATE : 29TH APRIL, 2009. : 29TH APRIL, 2009. : 29TH APRIL, 2009. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Learned Counsel appearing for the MHADA states that the BMC can issue NOC to the petitioners after the water charges are paid by the petitioner. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that so far no bills have been given to it which are required to ba paid. According to him there is no water supply to the premises. This fact is disputed by the learned Counsel appearing for the Corporation, who states that water tap exists and the water infact has been misused. 2. In view of the above there seems to be disputed questions of facts and it is not necessary for us to examine these controversies. We dispose of this petition with a direction to the MHADA to issue appropriate bills to the petitioner for consumption of water by the petitioner within two weeks from today, which the petitioner shall pay within two weeks thereafter. The BMC will thereafter issue the NOC to the petitioner, which will be without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties to challenge the bills in accordance with law. CHIEF CHIEF CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE JUSTICE A.A.SAYED, A.A.SAYED, A.A.SAYED, J. J. J.