IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1431 of 2005 1. PUNIT PASWAN, S/O LATE SHAUKHI PASWAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – BHARATPUR, PS. SURGADA, DISTRICT – MUNGER, AT PRESENT POSTED AS AN ASSISTANT ANCHAL KHARAGPUR, DISTRICT – MUNGER. 2. VINOD KUMAR MISHRA, S/O LATE GHANALAL VAIDHAYA, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA – MADHAPUR, P.S. KOTWALI, DISTRICT – MUNGER, AT PRESENT POSTED AS AN ASSISTANT IN THE OFFICE OF DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, MUNGER. 3. SMT. RANJANA SWARNAKAR, D/O LATE RADHA BALWA SWARNAKAR OF MOHALLA – CHANDANBAG, P.S. KASHIM BAZAR, DISTRICT – MUNGER, AT PRESENT WORKING AS AN ASSISTANT IN THE DISTRICT SPECIAL SECURITY OFFICE, MUNGER. 4. VISHWANATH PRASAD, S/O LATE FEKU PRASAD, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA – GULZAR POKHAR, P.S. KOTWALI, DISTRICT – MUNGER, AT PRESENT POSTED AS IN THE OFFICE OF GENERAL SECTION COLLECTRIATE, MUNGER. 5. VIMAL KUMAR SINGH, S/O SHRI MURALIDHAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – BHAGALPUR, AT PRESENT POSTED AS AN ASSISTANT IN THE BLOCK OFFICE, TARAPUR. 6. ASHOK KUMAR NAIYAR, SON OF LATE K.T. NANU OF MOHALLA – CHHOTIKELAWARI, P.S. KOTWALI, DISTRICT – MUNGER, AT PRESENT POSTED AS A GENERAL SECTION COLLECTRIATE, MUNGER. 7. KISHOR KUMAR, SON OF SHRI YOGENDRA PANDIT OF MOHALLA – RAISAR, P.S. KOTWALI, DISTRICT – MUNGER, AT PRESENT POSTED AS AN ASSISTANT IN THE OFFICE OF BALRIYARPUR BLOCK, DISTRICT – MUNGER. 8. MURALIDHAR PRASAD, SON OF LATE LALA SUDHAKAR PRASAD, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA – SHASTRI NAGAR, P.S. KASIM BAZAR, DISTRICT – MUNGER, AT PRESENT WORKING AS IN GENERAL SECTION COLLECTRIATE, MUNGER. …………… PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DIRECTOR, COMMISSIONER –CUM- SOCIAL LABOUR EMPLOYMENT AND TREASURY DEVELOPMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY, LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA. 5. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MUNGER. 6. D.D.C., MUNGER. 7. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, TARAPUR, MUNGER. 8. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BARIYARPUR, MUNGER. …………………. RESPONDENTS. ----------- 05/ 15.03.2011 Yesterday when this case was called, no one appeared for the petitioner. Today again no one is present on behalf of the petitioner. 2 This application is dismissed for non- prosecution. DKS/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)