IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 51 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 120 OF 2009 MORMUGAO MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER ... Applicant Versus BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF MORMUGAO ... Respondent Mr. S. D. Padiyar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Y. V. Nadkarni, Advocate for the Respondent. Coram:- S.B. DESHMUKH & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 19th January, 2011 P.C.: We heard learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respective parties. We have seen order dated 13-12-2010 passed by this Court (Coram: S.B. Deshmukh & F.M. Reis, JJ.). 2. There is consensus among the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties that final notices were issued to 363 persons, out of these 363 persons, 30 persons have filed 30 appeals before the competent authority. Out of these 30 appeals, stay was granted to 23 persons by the competent authority in relation to the appeals filed by them. On this factual position additional affidavit is filed by the petitioner which is not objected by the Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 3. Our order dated 13-12-2010 and additional affidavit on behalf of the petitioner on record states that 30 persons/appellants out of 363 persons against whom final notices have been issued, 23 persons were granted stay. 4. In view of the above, by modification, now it is clarified that out of 363 persons who had received final notices, 30 persons were before the competent authority and among these 30 persons, stay was granted in 23 appeals and this position was existing on 13-12-2010. In our opinion further action therefore may be initiated, if not taken, in respect of remaining except 23 appellants. 5. With this modification, civil application is partly allowed and disposed of. S.B. DESHMUKH, J. F. M. REIS, J. EV