( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 688 OF 2009 Dr. Shivaji s/o Marotrao Panzade APPELLANT VERSUS Sow Usha w/o Shivajirao Panzade RESPONDENT ..... Smt. Manjusha Deshpande, advocate for the appellant. Mr. A.S. Deshmukh, advocate for the respondent. ..... [CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.] [DATE : 22nd April, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard Smt. Deshpande, learned counsel for the appellant – Dr. Shivaji and Mr. Deshmukh, learned counsel for the respondent – Sow Usha. 2. The parties are present, identified by respective counsel. 3. The husband – Dr. Shivaji withdraws the second appeal. Allowed. The wife – Sow Usha, in presence of ( 2 ) Mr. A.S. Deshmukh, makes a statement, she has patched up her controversies with her husband – Dr. Shivaji and desires to join company of the husband – Dr. Shivaji with the daughter, who is studying in 10th standard. I do not see any oblique motive in such statement by Sow Usha – the respondent since the second appeal itself is withdrawn by her husband – Dr. Shivaji wherein the contentions were for divorce. In the controversy between the couple, the female child should not be a casualty and should not be a sufferer as her welfare needs to be a paramount object for the couple. The wife – Sow. Usha further makes a statement, without any reasonable cause, she will not part with company of her husband – Dr. Shivaji, on flimsy grounds. 4. In view of above circumstances, the second appeal stands disposed of. No costs. [ K. U. CHANDIWAL ] JUDGE NPJ/sa688-09 ( 3 )