IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) MONDAY THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND SIX : PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1121 of 2006 Between: Cement Corporation of India Limited, Tandur, Ranga Reddy District, Rep. By its Manager (Personnel and Administration), K.C. Gopinathan Nair. ..... Petitioner AND 1. Mr. B.V. Rajendrudu, Deputy Director, Employees State Insurance Corporation, Regional Office, 5-9-23, Hillfort Road, Hyderabad –063. 2. Mr. M. George, Recovery Officer, Employees State Insurance Corporation, Regional Office, 5-9-23, Hillfort Road Hyderabad –063. .....Respondents To 1. Mr. B.V. Rajendrudu, Deputy Director, Employees State Insurance Corporation, Regional Office, 5-9-23, Hillfort Road, Hyderabad –063. 2. Mr. M. George, Recovery Officer, Employees State Insurance Corporation, Regional Office, 5-9-23, Hillfort Road Hyderabad –063. WHEREAS the Petitioners herein has presented a petition to this court under Section 10, 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the Respondents for violation of the Orders dated 13-10-2006 in W.P.M.P.No. 26988 of 2006 in W.P.No. 21273 of 2006; AND WHEREAS this court upon hearing the arguments of Sri S. Venkateswara Reddy, Advocate for the petitioners while admitting the Contempt Case and while dispensing with the presence of Respondents for the present and directing counter affidavit be filed by the 1st respondent within four weeks, further directed issue of notice to the Respondents herein to show cause why, in the circumstances stated in the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof (copies of which are annexed hereto) they should not be punished for contempt of court; Now: Therefore you namely ; 1. Mr. B.V. Rajendrudu, Deputy Director, Employees State Insurance Corporation, Regional Office, 5-9-23, Hillfort Road, Hyderabad –063. 2. Mr. M. George, Recovery Officer, Employees State Insurance Corporation, Regional Office, 5-9-23, Hillfort Road Hyderabad –063. BE AND HEREBY are directed to show cause why in the circumstances stated in the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof, you should not be punished for contempt of court ; Sd/- P. EKAMBARAM, DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. (in duplicate with a copy of petition and affidavit for service on the respondents and return to this court on or before 11-12-2006) 2.Mr. B.V. Rajendrudu, Deputy Director, Employees State Insurance Corporation, Regional Office, 5-9-23, Hillfort Road, Hyderabad –063. 3.Mr. M. George, Recovery Officer, Employees State Insurance Corporation, Regional Office, 5-9-23, Hillfort Road Hyderabad –063. (ADDRESSEES 2 & 3 BY RPAD with a copy of petition and affidavit) 4.Two spare copies. TKK Note :- The last paragraph of the order dt. 13-11-2006 in Contempt Case No. 1121 of 2006 is corrected as per the order of the Deputy Registrar as follows : ‘BE AND HEREBY are directed to show cause why in the circumstances stated in the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof, you should not be punished for Contempt of Court”. Substitute this corrected order in place of previous order which already dispatched on 18-11-2006. Sd/- P. EKAMBARAM, DEPUTY REGISTRAR HIGH COURT GRJ Date: 13-11-2006 AMENDMENT ORDER C.C. No. 1121 of 2006. DISPENSING WITH THE PRESENCE OF RESPONDENTS. DRAFTED BY TKK DT.15-11-2006. HIGH COURT GRJ Date: 13-11-2006 Note :- Post on 11-12-2006. C.C. No. 1121 of 2006. DISPENSING WITH THE PRESENCE OF RESPONDENTS AND DIRECTION TO THE RESPONDENTS TO APPEAR BEFORE THIS COURT