\c^^ .:^<^-'''"::..-- ^^•.•:^.- v^. f-w^^y>-" SJ^i^'i ^ ^^tlCS'. (^§3;S^-—^'-^w c . C . \^ ^^^ -»»" IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OP 0-iHI^TT ISGARH AT BIL^SPUR W«P« No. 4'^_?S-/2005 PSTITIONBR ^•i /^. ?-* Rakesh Kumar Baghel S/o Bhaiyalal Baghel^ aged aboufc 16 ye^rs^ R/o village Didori^ Tah* Loxmi^ Disfcto Bilaspur (c*G<i) through Bhaiyalal Baghel S/o late Parashuram aged about 40 years, father of fche Petitioner, R/o village Didori, Tahi Lormi^ Disfct^ Bila^ur (C<G»)» Being minor represented fchrough his father^ VSRSU^ $- - 1) The State of CnhatfcjLsgarh Through- School Education Deparfement ^ Raipuro ^2) The Chhatfcisgarh Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, Raipur (C.G.)<» ^" WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OP THE CONSTITUT20N pB* INDIA S*OR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT(3)« ORDER(S), DIR2CTION(S) TO D0_ JUSTICE IN THE MATTER* RESP01S1DENTS *11*1WI ^»TTq» \3-c.r|'^qiqiC)<4^tP-a1wi<S, Rrtl^-l^ .l/SJ.r..../v<s'.:..l1..^&C. W^200^ 3TT^9T q=m? (<^t3CI^) ^^T^rR^icb ?T81T3TI^9Tamhp ^n'toshan/- ?^1TSf?^rf^T3Tr^$T 21.10.2P95 Shri M.K. Bhadiui, Adv<| Shri Saadeep Dubey, G<| Shri Pankaj Agai-wal, Ac^ Pursuant to tlie Cour counsel for respondent No.2 the subjects, same have beenj petitioner, petitioner hioiself are satisfied witli tlie evaj Therefore, fhere is no merit m| Leaiiied counsel for th^ per Court order, to leained c| tani to deposit flie same wiflij In view of tlie above, fh^ I.A. No.8641/05 stands tpi<<Io<?lvi ^i^oT^'l^^l \Rn^i^< ^srf^ran^^ |)cate for tlie petitioner, ^vt., Advocate for respondent No, 1, |vocate for respondent No,2, |;'s order dated 6.10.2005 leamed ^as brought flie answer sheets of all perused by leaiTied counsel for tlie ^ father of flie petitioner and they [uation done by tlie Invigilators. ftiis m.atter. petitioner has paid Rs.1,000/-, as 3unsel for respondent No.2, who ia respondent No,2. peUtion is dismissed. disposed of Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge SP/FS/2005-20,000 ^ y ^