IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 6TH MAY 2010 / 16TH VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 14347 of 2010(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- K.K. SALEEM, S/O. SYED MOHAMMED, KUNDANKADAVATH HOUSE, P.O, PARAPPANANGADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.K.MOHAMED RAVUF RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE HUSUR SHERISTADAR, THE POLICE COMPLAINT COMITTEE, COLLECTORATE, MALAPPURAM. 2. THE DY. SUPDT,. OF POLICE, TIRUR. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUR GOVT.PLEADER SRI.M.P.MOAMMED FAZIL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 14347 OF 2010 (P) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of May, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that he is employed in the Middle East. According to him his relationship with his wife was not cordial and that during March 2010, while the petitioner was absent, his wife left the house locking the same, and taking away his passport, driving licence etc. Coming to know of the same he made Ext.P1 complaint to the 2nd respondent and in view of his inaction, he made Ext.P2 complaint to the 1st respondent, which also is allegedly remaining unattended. It is with this grievance, the writ petition is filed. 2. In the facts as stated above, without expressing anything on the merits of the allegations levelled and leaving the whole issue entirely open, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to conduct enquiry on the allegations contained in Ext.P1 complaint in accordance with law and with notice to the parties. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible. WPC.No. 14347/10 :2 : Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the 2nd respondent for compliance. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/