IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44898 of 2007 NARESH PRASAD YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 16.01.2009 Heard leaned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the orders dated 7.1.2007 of the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar Gaya in Dispute Case No. 22 of 2004 declining to initiate proceeding under Section 188 of the Penal Code and which came to be affirmed in Cr. Rev. No. 84 of 2007 by the Sessions Judge, Gaya by order dated 7.8.2007. Both the orders are based on sound reasons. An order under Section 144 Cr.P.C. has a duration for its existence in accordance with the statutory provisions. To invoke Section 188 of the Penal Code for violation of the same the sine qua non would be details of the date and time of violation so as to demonstrate its occurrence within the period of prohibition. In absence of the same, the allegations shall become vague. For that reason this Court finds no infirmity in the reasoning contained in the impugned orders to warrant interference. This application is dismissed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)