Z¢ x E CHHATTISGARH zigy'bfBILAsPUR 1 ~ R / Wrf " ..‘.. J”! w.P No Q3 2/2002 State of Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretary, Forest Department, D K S Bhawan, Raiput /Chhattisgarh PETITIONER: Versus Hariram Sonkar, Aged about 62 years, $/o Shri sarju Prasad Sonkar, R/o Namta Nagar Rajnandgaon , Teh.& Distt. Rajnandgapn, Chhattisgarh // 5 PM§EJTIONER UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIX QEVESION gENCH: — é H$N3LE EzHRI KHN. KURANGA, 34 HQN’ELE $HRI L.€‘ $HADQG, 4 1?!Gé/2063: - Heard Shri Rnnbir Singh Govt Advomi'e, for The Sm‘r'e'fpai‘rioner. “-1 This wrif pefifian under Arm le 226/227 of The Cen$1'i‘ru?ion of India has been file‘éi‘chaHehgin »+he order dafed 1?/Q5/2000 passed by fhe Madhya Pradesh S‘mf AdminisfraT%ve Tr§bunaL Raipur Bench in Origina! Applica‘réon No.83 of 1998 by>which ‘(h'eiaumed Tribunal quashed The orders Ahnex res-£/4 and A/9r passed<by fhe D§s+ri¢f Fares? Officer and 1'he Cons- rvd‘mr of Fares? respecfiveiy. ‘ A perusal 9f ‘rhe impugned' order shows fha‘r Annexure~A/4 was quashed because fhe same w s passea wifhau? feliowing ‘rhe ‘recedure as emi‘sageci §n Ruie 6 b”? ‘f'he' MP. Civii Serviges €iass§ficafi0h, Cmfroi, 6x Appea!) R !es, 1966 w vicie Anhexure—fEM 'khe recovery of Qs.38;80é/— Was deres from W‘he sséaryxif fhe uiry Eh cahsomhce wish The rovisions 0f §uie 16 sf 'i‘he M . Civi§ 5ervices"(Cbssifica‘riom . p . ' p u"( r respcndeh‘i‘ wifhou? hoMihg cmy ' i ‘ q XI—HC-22 . {Zon‘rroi §§ Appeai) Ruks, 1966.. Tk AnneXura—A/9 on ihe groumd fhm giving amt opbor‘mniw of baing heam raspondem' and The? is why ‘rha 'condusion fhm‘ ‘l‘he amire procedur . quashed. ounsei appearing for ihe Having heard iaarned c S‘mTe/‘pe‘iiiioner, havingkegard Ta “fine abeve facfs cf The, case, we ‘ are of‘Jrhe opinion Thm‘ The 'earned iiiegaii‘iy aw irreguiari'ry in passing The impugneci érder. Therefore, we d9 ne'i' find any ground To inferfere wi‘in The impugned order of f‘ne Tribune! and we are Vof The opinion fha‘i’ The wri‘i pe‘i’i‘iion has no i meri? anci The same is iiabie “To be dieriissed and ii- is dismissed. ? Sdl- ‘ Chief Justice l‘$r‘ajh * ag a iaarned Tribunai haEs qua§ne& ‘i'he same was pagsed wifhou‘i i in snppor'? of "rhe appeai To tine ieamed Tribunai reachad The 'e of ‘ihe appeai is Iiable To be ribunal has no+ commiffed any L Sd/- i L.C.BHADOO w I ‘ , ‘ "i§'¥\m ‘L‘ Judge , i ‘rr