^ HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT.BILASPUR SB': HO ?BLB SHm JUSTICE PmTINKBR DIWAKBR W.P. 181 WO. 2609/2000 ^ -^ PBTITIO'NBR^ RBSPONDENTS Vcr^UB 1. Uziiesh Siiigh Netani, S/ o. Shri Alam Sai, aged about.20 years, 'R/o, vitlage Cliaiidan Nagar, P.S. aad Btock Rreiiiiiagar, Tahsil Surajpur, Distt, Surguja(CG) State . df Through Paxichayat Developinent, Raipiir(CG) Chhattisgai'h, fhe Secretary, 8& Rural D.K.S.Bhawan, 2. The ControUer, Clihattisgarh Professional Exainiuation Board, Raipur (CG) 3. The CoUector Surguja, Distt. Surguja (CG) 4, The Chief Executive Ofiicer, Janpad Paiichayat, Preninagar, Distt, Surguja WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OP THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearaaoe: Shri A.N,Paadey, couiisel for fhe petitioner. Shri. Paakaj Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer for fhe State, ORALORDBR (15.05.2009) Witli Gonsent oftiie leanied coiinsel appearhig for the parties, the raatter is heard fiaalty, ChaUenge ia this petitbn is to the order dated 24.1.2009 passed by tlie Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Q0 Paachayat, Prein Nagar whereby fhe representation given by fhe petitioner has been i^Jected, Leamed counsel for tlie petitioner fairly subinits that he has a remedy to cliallenge the said onler before the CoUector uuder Rule 3 of fhe C.G. Panchayat Raj Adhmiyam, 1993 aiid therefore he waats to wifhdraw the present petition wifli Mberty to approach fh.e conipetent aufhority. He furtlier submits ffaat tlxe conipetent authority 32iay be directed to decide the petitioner's case irrespective of the fact fh.at the petitioner has filed the same after expiry of tiie period of lioiitation. I have heard coiuisel for the parties. It is directed that if an.y such appMcation is flled withia a period offhree weeks froia today, fhe same m.ay be| considered ignoriag fhe point bf lix&it^Aion .Uberafiy and itt would be decided on it own nierits an.d^mLajcconlaiice with law. . .. "'-<: • •' •::\-. With fhe above observatk>n, fhe petition staiids disposed of Sd/- PritinkerDiwaker Judge