IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6237 of 2003. Bharat Lal son of Shri Ram Narain. VERSUS Civil Judge (Senior Division) & Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Srimadhopur, District Sikar & Others Date Of Order ::: 19/03/2008. Hon'ble Mr. Narendra Kumar Jain J. Mr. Ajay Gupta, Counsel for the Petitioner Mr. Manish Sharma, advocate, for Mr. Anoop Dhand, Counsel for the respondents BY THE COURT : Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file fresh application to summon the F.S.L. Report. He submits that he moved an application in the trial Court to summon the FSL Report in respect of so-called forged rent-note, but the same was dismissed only on the ground that the petitioner has not placed on record a certified or uncertified copy of the FSL Report nor he has given any date thereof. He submits that now he has received a certified copy of the FSL Report, therefore, he may be given liberty to file fresh application to summon the same in accordance with law. After considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I allow the prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh application to summon the FSL Report in respect of so-called forged rent-note. It is made clear that the grant of liberty to file an application will not create any equity or right in favour of the petitioner and the trial Court will decide the application, if it is filed, in accordance with law and without being influenced in any manner from this order. It will be open for the respondent to contest the said application on all grounds, including the ground of delay in filing the application. There will be no order as to costs. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. ashok/