IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.7902 of 2010 Date of Decision : May 03, 2010. Jaspal Singh and others .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Raj Kumar Arya, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners, who were appointed as Teaching Fellows, challenge the termination of their services which have been terminated, inter-alia, on the allegations that the petitioners have produced the bogus experience certificates to secure their recruitment. The petitioners, on the other hand, assert that their experience certificates are genuine. Alternatively, it is urged that even if the marks for the `experience' are excluded or not awarded to them, still the petitioners make to the merit-list. Reliance is placed on a decision of this Court dated 18.3.2010 in Civil Writ Petition No.11111 of 2009 (Parminder Kaur versus State of Punjab and others). C.W.P.No .7902 of 2010 2 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and considering the assertions made on their behalf, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction that let the petitioners represent to the authorities alongwith the material in support of their plea that the `experience certificates' relied upon by them are genuine and/or they are otherwise entitled to be given appointment. The said representation(s), if any, shall be considered by respondent No.2 in the light of the above cited decision of this Court in Parminder Kaur's case (supra) , within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. May 03, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE