IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 13353 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: July 13, 2010. Jagdish @Jaggi @Jagganath and another. ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Haryana ...... RESPONDENT(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Jitender Dhanda, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ranvir Singh Arya, D.A.G., Haryana. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) This is an application for regular bail filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in FIR No. 79 dated 03.02.2010, under Sections 307/323/506/34 IPC, registered at Police Station city Hansi. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner No.1 – Jagdish has been continuing in custody since 06.02.2010 and petitioner No.2 – Harish has been continuing in custody since 07.02.2010. It is further contended that trial is not likely to be concluded in CRM No.M-13353 of 2010 near future as no witness has been examined so far. It is further contended that no offence under Section 307 IPC is made out. It has been stated by learned counsel for the State that challan in this case has already been filed and however, no witness has been examined so far. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioners are likely to abscond or that they are likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, keeping in view these facts and without expressing any opinion on merits, the instant application for regular bail filed on behalf of Jagdish @Jaggi @Jagganath and Harish @Monu, is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Hisar. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) July 13, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2