BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. IntheMatterof W.P.No. PETITIONER Between M.A. Qureshi, aged about 54 years, son of Abdul Samad Kureshi, resident of Housing Board Colony, North Chakradhar Nagar, Raigarh (CG), Drug Inspector, Raigarh. VERSUS RESPONaENTS 1. 2. M/ ^f^f '-/..A''Q>- .^y <!(•" * •' < V"' 3. 4. 5. State of Chhattisgarh, through : Principal Secretary, Public Health and Family Welfare, Mantralay DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG) Controller, Food and Drug Administration, Old Nurses Hostel, Near Mantralay, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Joint Director, Food and Dru; Administration, Raigarh (Chhattisgarh). Collector Raigarh, (Chhattisgarh) Nilambar Seth, Drug Inspector, Korea, Distt. Korea (Clihattisgarh) WRIT PETITIQN UNDR ARTICLES 226f227 _OF_ THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA J''OR_ISSUANQ^OF_WRIT IN THE NATURE OP MANDAMUS, CERTIORARL^ND/OR ANY OTHER WRIT LIKE NATURE. ,/ ES^^ SB ii^ III K 11 B$ HI 01) PARTICULAKS-ABQUX^IU'-DJ ::!1 '|iN|%i^KB '1:^^.":::' 3n^?[w Fi-il'n 3IRBI ^^}<^^Tft^ ^K^^iBB^SIlSiBSSBSSHRSSS? 21/03/2003 Shi~i Kishore Bhaduri, Shri Raiibir Smgh, GA fo Heard. cobnsel for tbe petitioaer. * t- the State. he challenge ui tiiis -4rit petition is to tlie order dated &er who 1s workme as a Drug 19/12/2002 vvhereby tlie inspector, has beeii ti~aiisfen~ed| It is stated that the repr^seutation filed agaiast ttie order of traas ilie petitioner is not able to reprcscntatioa has not bce4 approaclied fhis coui~t for relief,| Since fbe representatiod whicb is still pending, it vrould to consider it on ou~n its in.eriti '*l<lli'l''il-l t<l^irt!^~fs^t<pi]t(i< ^3lf;tftr3iT^I . froiu Raigai'h to Aiubibs.pur. seutation (Aunexure P/6) has beeu 'er pouitiiig out (he dit5ciUt.ies that move out diie to aihaent of lii; 'w— . - -. iV daughter wlio is suiicring 4-om. Thvroid discasc. As tj considercd, thc pctitioncr has has been filed bv flie petitioner be appropriate for tlie Govenunent ;^. Accorduigly, this writ petition is ^ disposed of by directiag tbe respoiident 110.2 to consider and dispose ofthe petitioner's repre^entation 011 its own ineiits vvifhm a period ofsixweeks froiu tlie dE^te ofcorcmiunicaaoii/'receipt oftliis iSS ^i XI-HC-2Z m '3:^-^lt'ijf<ft'>'l,'9inl<i'iSt^faai*i3<. T.yfK^K'^Bf^ sn^i^i ^^snt?! wqhT'glta' ^&.£..S..W^s ^^y.y^..^f,.J^......^.'^xJ&^r^^.L.l.h ^ t> '^-<-^ sn^ii^iRrester order. It is niade clear tbat 4liis Court is not exnressiag anv opiaioii on tlie nieiits of tlii raised by tbe petitioner, wh^ch is to be considered by fhe Autliorln- on its own Hients. With the aforesaicl ^ petition is disposed of. C(j)nsequeiiUy, M.W.P.No. 391/2003 a-ad LA.No. 1023/2003 also stajlld disroc.sed of. <4ii^d41^ TnT?^f ^ f^^i <^t^.i< I? 31RIH 311^1 case or on the pentioner s contention bbservalious and directbns this writ Sdl- p.C NA1K judge [-•ftitfea ^ r\j