EKé‘rii C(EUR‘i‘jPF {IEIHA’i"HS{}ARH AT EELASPUR WR I? PETITION N3); 140 0f 2G0; PE’E‘K'E‘IONFJR Dhan Singh Pate}, aged about 45 years, son of Shri Ugra$en Pate}, working as Pmjbct Adminisimtor, Tribai Welfare ProjecL Dharamjaigarn Dim. Raigar‘h (Chhaiiisgarh) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State efChhattisgarhithrough : The Secmtary, Department 0f SC/ST, OBC and Minority Welfare, D.K.SK (Chhattisgarh) N The State of Madhya I’radesh, *fhrough : its Secremryv Department of SC/ST, OBC, and Minority Weifare, Vaiiabh Bhawan, Bhopal (MP) 3n The Commissioner, Seheduied Caste and Sched‘uied ’I‘ribe Welfare Bhawan, Raipur Depattment, Premises of Ravishankax Sukia Uuiversity, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 4. 'I‘he Commisgioner, Seheduied Caste and Scheduied Tribe Welfare Department, Satoura Bhawan, Bhopal (M?) W1{1T_PE§IlQl\L§LNMDER AR'HCLE 226/227Qf THE CQbLSJILQTQCAJgFiNELA M SB: Hmn’hie Shri Satish K. Awnihotri. J‘ Present: Shri Shashmk 'I‘hakm‘, Advocate for the petitioner. Me Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the Statez’regpoxzdent No. 1 & 3 - ‘ §&£Q§Q¥§$ (Pegged w Mm eay sf Adgm, 2008) \ ,. With the consent ofthe parties, the matter is taken up for heating finaliy. Learned counee} appeaxing for the petitioner submits that the charge-sheet was issued against the petitioner when he 'waS working as incharge, Assistant Commissionex: Tribal Welfare Departmeng iiashpui: .oe 5:4.2GGU we i \ _2. (Armexure P11). A§er bifurcation ofthe Siam ofMad‘nya Pradesh, by urder datad 14.8.2002 (Amexure PM), the Coiiector, $urguja§ was apgomted as enquiry officer and tha AsSistant Project Admmistmtori iaategrated Tribal Welfare Projeci, PaL Ramwmganj? Disirict Surgujay was appointed as presenting viiicer. In the said order, it was mentioned that the ergquiry be completed wit§§in a peried of60 éays and a mpmi may be wbmitied to the Gm/enmem. Shri ’3‘hakur funher submits that despite the Order dated 143.2002, no action has been taken tiil date. The petitioner is being harassed unnecessari1y for delay in conclusion ofthe enquiry. Be ihai aS it may. since the enquiry is pending eonsitieraijon, the Order to quash tiisciplinary enquiry cannot be yassed at This sfage. Hewever. in the inierest of justice. the Collector, Surguja, is (Eirected to comp¥ete ihe enquixy expeditiously. preferabiy within a period of 60 days item the receipt ofa copy of fhis‘order, in accordance wi‘ih Iaw, on its own merit. In View of the toregoing, this yetition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Consequently, MOW)? No. 122/2005. aiso stands disposed of. e‘ Sd/— 1 y /-’3 Satish K. Agnihotrif‘ f s ; Judge 7’ ‘ -‘ ‘y :