1 IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE SIDE SIDE LETTERS LETTERS LETTERS PATENT PATENT PATENT APPEAL NO. 219 OF 2001 APPEAL NO. 219 OF 2001 APPEAL NO. 219 OF 2001 M/s. Anita Medical System Pvt. Ltd. ... Appellants Vs. Dr. Gopal Mahadeo Dhadphale ...Respondents Mr. R.V. Govilkar for Appellants. Mr. S.M. Dixit for Respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED : AUGUST 25, 2004 P.C. : 1. This was a petition filed by Respondent herein invoking article 227 of the Constitution of India. Reliefs sought in the petition was as under : "That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or a writ in the nature of Certiorari and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari, calling for the records and proceedings in Appeal No. 33 of 1998 in R.A.D. Suit No. 3604 of 1987 before the Court of Small Causes at Mumbai, Bandra Branch and after going through the same, quash and set aside the Order dated 4.5.2000 passed by the appeal Court in R.A. Appeal No. 33 of 1988 before the Court of Small Causes at Mumbai, Bandra Branch." 2. This Petition came to be disposed of along with some other writ petitions. Writ Petition No. 2254 2 of 2001 was allowed. That petition is subject matter of the present L.P.A. 3. Considering that the petitioner now respondent herein, had invoked only supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and even otherwise, as the petition was preferred to challenge the orders of the Subordinate court/tribunal, no L.P.A. would be maintainable. Considering that L.P.A. rejected. 4. The learned counsel for the appellant seeks stay to the operation of the order. Considering the fact that the appellants are in possession, it will be in the fitness of things that they are not dispossessed at least for the period of eight weeks on the petitioner’s filing usual undertaking within two weeks from today. If the undertaking is not filed within two weeks, it will be open to the respondents to execute the order in their favour. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.)