IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP (T) No. 5863 of 2008(OA No.1707/1999) Decided on : 28.10.2010. Sarwan Dass …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others ..Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Surinder Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Ms. Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Ashwani Pathak, Advocate for respondent No.4. Kuldip Singh, Judge (Oral) The following prayers have been made in the writ petition:- (i) That the impugned Annexure A-4 dated September 02, 1998 may be quashed and set-aside. (ii) That the respondents may be directed to pay to the applicant enhanced pension with effect from August 31, 1990 (date of superannuation), along with interest at the rate of 18 percent per annum, after taking into account the Selection Grade granted to the applicant vide Annexure A-1 dated June 18, 1997. (iii) That the respondents may further be directed to release the applicant other retiral benefits, like DCRG, Leave Salary etc., after refixing the pay of the applicant on 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the Judgment ? 2 the basis of Annexure A-1 dated June 18, 1997, along with interest at the rate of 18 percent per annum.” 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the case of the petitioner is covered by judgment dated 28.6.2010 in CWP(T) No. 6029 of 2008. This submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner has not been opposed by the other side, rather the learned counsel for the respondents have submitted that the case of the petitioner is covered by judgment dated 28.6.2010 in CWP(T) No. 6029 of 2008 titled Gambhir Chand Sood Vs. State of H.P.& Ors. 3. In these circumstances, the petition is allowed, the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner in view of judgment dated 28.6.2010 in CWP (T) No. 6029 of 2008 referred to above. The needful be done within a period of two months after the production of copy of the judgment by the petitioner to the competent authority. The petition stands disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. ( Kuldip Singh ), October 28, 2010 Judge. (GR)