hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 1030 OF 2002 Zuleikha Sultan Allana and Ors. ... Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. G. Misquitta i/by Mahendra Patel & Associates for Petitioners. Mr. K.R. Belosey, A Panel Counsel for State. Respondent No. 4 present in person. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 18, 2010 P.C. The counsel for the Petitioner states that they have instructions to withdraw the matter. Admittedly Respondent No. 4 who has been allotted a flat and in possession is present in the court. Respondent No. 4 has deposited the money before the Collector. In the light of that the following order: Petition disposed of as withdrawn. Rule discharged. Amount deposited to continue to remain deposited with the Collector. If Respondent No. 4 files any petition, the same would be entertained independently and the money deposited thereafter can be subject matter of the writ petition being filed. Since th petition is now withdrawn and Respondent No. 4 will be the person aggrieved, disposal of this petition will not stand in his way in filing fresh petition. (J.H. BHATIA,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)