IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No 354 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.P.BUCH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Versus MUKESH DEVENDRAPRASAD PANDYA -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Criminal Revision Application No. 354 of 1999 MR AMIT J SHAH for Petitioner No. 1 MR BN KESHWANI for Respondents No. 1-3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE D.P.BUCH Date of decision: 21/01/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT By consent, this revision application is taken up for final disposal today. Heard the learned advocate for the petitioner and also Mr B N Keshwani, learned Advocate for all the three respondents. It appears that the revision application has been filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation against an order passed by the Special Judge, Ahmedabad City on 30.4.1999 allowing application Exh.59 and closing down the evidence of the petitioner-original complainant. 2. Learned Advocate for the respondents states that having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, it is difficult to say that there was negligence on the part of the complainant in producing evidence within the time stipulated in the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court. He, therefore, submits that the revision application may be allowed. 3. In that view of the matter, this revision application is allowed. The order of the learned Special Judge, Ahmedabad City passed on 30.4.1999 in Special Case No.17/92 below Application Exh.59 is quashed and set aside. The matter is remanded to the trial court for trial and disposal of the case according to law. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. 21.1.2002 [D P Buch, J.] msp