IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3520 of 2006 BHARAT THAKUR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 30.4.2010. Heard Mr. Shambhu Narain Singh for the petitioner, Mr. Ashok Kumar, Assisting Counsel to G.A.1 for the State. The petitioner superannuated from the post of Junior Engineer with effect from 31.10.2001 and had earlier came to this Court through C.W.J.C.No.8301 of 2003 by raising issue of non-payment of his post retiral benefits. The entire post retiral benefits as admissible to the petitioner was paid to him except for an amount of Rs.26,300/, which had been recovered from the amount of his leave encashment against some advances outstanding against him and for which the petitioner was willing to offer explanation.. In this view of the matter, the writ petition was finally disposed of vide order dated 17.5.2004with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the Executive Engineer, Saran Canal Division, Siwan to resolve the dispute and if the petitioner was able to hand over the charge of the materials and submitted the vouchers in question, the amount was be released. 2 It is contended that in compliance of the order of this court the petitioner approached the Executive Engineer concerned by filing a representation dated 2.7.2004 placed at Annexure-5 of the proceedings and which has yet remained pending giving rise to the present proceedings. As there already exists an order of this Court in context of the pending grievance, placed at Annexure-4, hence the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Executive Engineer, respondent no.4 to discharge his obligation in the light of the directions of this court contained in Annexure-4 within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.. (Jyoti Saran,J.) ahk