[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.108 OF 2007 M/s.NYK Line (India) Ltd. ..Applicant Vs. M/s.LMJ International Ltd. & Anr. ..Respondents ... None for applicant Mr.Subhodh Desai for Respondent No.1 Mr.A.S.Shitole, A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : FEBRUARY 21, 2007 DATE : FEBRUARY 21, 2007 DATE : FEBRUARY 21, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The applicant-original accused has preferred this petition for quashing of C.R.No.M-1/2006 registered at Nhava Sheva Police Station. 2. Heard Mr.Subhodh Desai, the learned advocate for the respondent no.1-original complainant. The learned advocate for the respondent no.1-original complainant states that the parties have settled the matter and they have entered into an M.O.U. which is annexed at Exhibit-B to the petition. Mr.Desai states that in view of the said M.O.U. [-2-] C.R.No.M-1/2006 be quashed and the property seized by the Investigating Agency be returned to the respondent no.1-complainant. 3. In view of the above statement made on behalf of respondent no.1-original complainant and in view of the decision of the Apex Court in in the case of B.S.Joshi and another Vs. State of Haryana and B.S.Joshi and another Vs. State of Haryana and B.S.Joshi and another Vs. State of Haryana and another reported in Judgment Today 2003(3) S.C. another reported in Judgment Today 2003(3) S.C. another reported in Judgment Today 2003(3) S.C. 277, 277, 277, C.R.No.M-1/2006 registered at Nhava Sheva Police Station, is quashed. Property seized by the Investigating Agency in the said C.R., be returned to the respondent no.1-original complainant. 4. Application is disposed of. (V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J)