1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4180 OF 2010 YOGESH KAMLAKAR JAGTAP Age : 27, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O : MUKUNDWADI, AURANGBAD TQ. & DIST. AURANGBAD .... PETITIONER V E R S U S 1. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MANTRALAYA, MUMBAI. 2. THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, CIDCO, UDYOG BHAVAN, AURANGABAD. ..... RESPONDENTS Mr. M.P.Gude, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.V.Kurundkar, Govt. Pleader for State. Mr. A.S.Bajaj, Advocate for respondent no. 2. CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & S.V.GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE OF JUDGMENT : 05/05/2010 ORAL JUDGMENT : ( PER – P.V.HARDAS, J.) 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the parties, this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission. 2 2. The limited relief, which the petitioner has sought for in this petition is for issuance of direction to respondent no. 2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 10/10/2008. Mr. A.S.Bajaj, learned counsel for respondent no. 2 very fairly states that if the representation of the petitioner dated 10/10/2008 is pending, respondent no. 2 would decide the same, in accordance with law, within period of two months from today and communicate the decision thereon to the petitioner. 3. Rule is thus made absolute on the above terms with no order as to costs. [ S.V.GANGAPURWALA ] [ P.V.HARDAS ] JUDGE JUDGE knp/WP 4180.10 ( J )