IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION No.12214 of 1998 Between: P.G. Vijayakumar R/o H.No.37-84, Plot No.583, Defence Colony, Secunderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Jubilee Hills Co-op. House Building Society Ltd. Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-33 2 Ajas Ahmed R/o Gandhi Chowk, Wanaparthy, Mahaboobnagar 3 The Dy. Registrar Co.op. Societies (Housing) Hyderabad Opp: Pass Port Office, M.J. Road, Hyderabad 4 Justice P. Rama Rao (Rtd.) Hyderabad 3-1A Aurora Colony, Road No.3, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-34 5 Sri N. Subba Raju No.7, Sivabagh, Ameerpet, Hyderabad (Dismissed for default vide court order dt.28/3/2003) 6 Dr. D. Venkayya Chowdary 31 P&T Colony, Kharkhana, Secunderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ, directing respondent No.1 to cancel the registered sale deed of 2nd respondent Ajas Ahmed, dt: 28-12-1991 and to confirm the possession and sale in favour of the petitioner dt: 17-9-1991 by executing the sale deed in favour of the petitioner by calling for records in ARC No.10/96 on the file of Deputy Registrar/Arbitrator and Arbitral Tribunal in CTA No.209/1997, dt: 21-3-1998 while holding that the order passed by the Arbitral Tribunal in CTA No.209/97 as illegal and void. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.NARASIMHA CHARY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.PALLA.DAMODAR REDDY The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION No.12214 of 1998 ORDER: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Eswaraiah) When the matter was taken up for hearing on 25-06-2009, none appeared for the petitioner and as such, the matter was directed to be posted under the caption “for dismissal”. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in spite of addressing a letter, dated 26-06- 2009 to the petitioner, there have been no instructions from his client. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J _____________________ P.SWAROOP REDDY, J Date: 16-07-2009 Prv