IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. W. P. (S) No. (é #‘l’Lf I2906. Smt. Jeevan Lata Bada Wife of if] Shri Rejoon Bada, Aged about 37 years, Occupation — Govt. Middle, Bhawreli, ®\A/IE o Bamnidih, R/o PWD Colony, Champa, Distt. Janjgir — Champa (C.G.) PETITIONER Teacher VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh,/' Through- The Secretary, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Department Education; D.K.S. Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) Bhawan, 2. Director, Public Instructiony Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Educatibn Officer Distt. Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Block f Distt. Janjgir— Bamnidih, Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 26 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT ORDERS AND DIRECTIONS AS DEEMED FIT , r 2 XI—HC-78 0 w;.€;;€§2..§éwf:.. mm a1 200 é, mm (W) ané$mri§af$ WWEWW mm$am ' égmm 11.12.2006 Shri Ashwani Shukla, lea med counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Sunita Jain, iearnei P.L. forthe StateJrespcndents. By this petition under Articles 226i22710f the Constitution of inclia, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to pay the increments and seniority on the basis of the date of her initial appointment in the iight of the decision rendered by the iearned State Administrative Tribunal, Jahalpur in Originat Application No. 145211998 (Harish Chandra S'gh and others Vs. State of MP. and others) dated 31 .1 .2000 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner placed on record copy of the order dated §th Oc ober 2006 passed by this Court in Writ Petition (S) No. 5473/2006 (R kesh Kumar Sharma and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ohers) and in Writ Petition (5) No. 547412006 (Jai Nath Bajpai Vs State of Chhattisgarh and others) and submits that the petitioner is miiariy situated, therefore, the similar order may be passed. 3. The case ofthe petition r 'rs that she was appointed as Teacher in the School Education .Depa ment on probation for a period of two years with the ftxed salary. Ho vever, later on, atter completion of two _ years’ probation, the petitioner regularized but, she was not given the regular pay scale from th date of her initial appointment. Other similarly situated teachers mo ed the State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur for regular pay-scale wherein learned Tribunai vide order dated 31.1.2000 altowed the same. The petitioner made several IIO n i s XI—HC—78 EW,W$,W mm ‘ .w-.P:.G.2...€..§L?.‘1. a1 ‘ 200g Wm (W) WWW WWEWW WWW ’ v agwm representations to, accord the same‘treatment as she was also similariy situated, but, the respandents have not paid any heed. Thus, this petition. 4. Learned counsel for- ti e petitioner submits that the petitioner may be allowed to make a repreaentation to respondent No.1 to give similar treatment to the petitioner and same pay-5cale which has been sanctioned to other similarly ‘uateol teachers on account of the order ofthe State Administrative Tri unal dated 31 .1 .2000, to which learned counsel for the respondents! ate has no objection. 5. Having heard learned ounsel for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstance ofthe case, in the opinion ofthis Court, the limited prayer made by-le rned counsel for the petitioner appears the petitioner is allowed to make a representation within 'a period of two weeks from today to respondent No.1, raising all her grievan es and, in turn, respondent No.1 shall decide the said representati in an objective manner within a period of 3O days from the date f receipt of such representation, after considering all the points r ised by the petitioner and taking into account the order dated 31.1.2000 passed by the learned State Administrative Tribunal in Ori inal Application No. 145211998. '6. The writ petition isac ordingly disposed of with the aforesaid direction. No order as to cos Sd/— Dhirendra Mishra t . 7. Certified copy as per'r les. Judge P.T.O. s"t , o