-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2895 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 33 OF 2005 Satish @ Raju Waman Koli and Ors. ..Applicants Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondents Mr.R.D.Suryawanshi Advocate for Applicants Ms.S.V.Gajare A.P.P. for the State CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JUNE 10, 2005 DATE : JUNE 10, 2005 DATE : JUNE 10, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard both sides. 2. All the four applicants have been convicted under section 395 of IPC and sentenced to R.I. for seven years. There is recovery at the instance of all the four applicants and all the four applicants have antecedents. The applicant no.1 has ten cases pending against him, applicant no.2 has 9 cases pending against him, applicant no.3 has one case pending against him and applicant no.4 has five -2- cases pending against him. Almost all the cases are of similar nature. Looking to these facts, I do not think that this is not a fit case to grant bail. Application for bail is rejected. [V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J]