IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.23209 of 2008 Between: 1 M. Jyothi Reddy W/o. Trinadha Reddy R/o. Dummugudem Village and Mandal Khammam District. 2 A. Vani Kumari W/o. Jagannadhacharyulu R/o. D.No. 9-2-107, Kunavaram Road, Bhadrachalam, Khammam District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Secretary Social Welfare Department, Secretariat at Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Small Savings Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 The District Collector (Small Savings) Khammam, Khammam District. 4 The Tahsildar, National Savings Government of India O/o. District Collector, Khammam District at Khammam. 5 The Post Master, Head Post Office, Bhadrachalam, Khammam District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in issuing Proceedings in Memo No. 5820/LTR1/2006-1 dt. 22-6-2006 as illegal and void to the extent of non- renewal of Small Saving Agencies prior to present impugned Memo by the 4th Respondent without considering the case of the petitioners as per the 2nd respondent order in Memo No. 8/A1/SS/2006 dt. 2-6-2006 is opposed to law and opposed to Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th Respondent to renew the petitioners agencies in question in accordance with law in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.K.VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE MR. A. RAJASEKHAR REDDY (ASST. SOLICITOR GENERAL) GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.23209 of 2008 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. _________________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 23rd April, 2009. Note:- Issue CC by tomorrow. BO IBL