«-^EJEi^%1 ^oK "^/'^- '^^ :*2!i.^^*-'=te5f=-s:i'^ ^l^^^fcs-' Petitioners • N L-^.I"-..,•~r*ir,i;,.».-%m^1, ;: yi^i •i''<3\^^iJw&l:i iii3y (Applicants) C! .M.P.No.212of2008 <. Laxman Bhsi S/o. Deoraj Rathors aged about 75 years, Proprietor of M.P. Kirana Store 2. juioti'al S/o. Suhaama! Totwani, aaed about 45 years, Proprietor of Super csssettss, (Both aidnema line Ralnandaaort Versus J^ 1. Naresh Baid S/o. Bhanwer Lal Baid, aged about 48 years, House of Inderchand Jain, Saa'ar Line, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 2. Manoj Jain S/o. IVIadanchand Jain, aged about 40 years, Arihant Finance R/o. Kailash Nagar, Town, Tashli and Dis'trict Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3. Sanjaya Gangwani S/o. Ramesh T. Gangwani, agsd about 35 years, Gall No. 6. Vvard No. 20, Lai Bag, Town, Tshsii and Distt.-Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 4. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Office of Coitector. Rainandcs.on >ETITION U/S. 482 OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE SB: Hon'bie Mr. T.P. Sharma. J.) Prssent: Shri V.K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Rhri Shri Ravindra Agrawa! and Shrl Sanjsev K. Agrawal, Pane! iawyers the resoondent No. 4/State. (Passed on 28'" Apri!, 2008) This petitSon is dlrected against the order dated 24.9.2007 passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Rajnandgaon in Crimina; Cass No. 1507/2005 whereby fte ieamed Sub Divisiona! Maaistrate has reiected the DreHr-iinaw objection of ths pemioners in proceeding of section 133 of the Code of CriminalProcedure,1973. 2. The order is chaiienged on ths ground that ths trial court has wronfliv "smissed prellminarv objsction of the oetitioners. ^as'^fa, 1 •-^liSli. ^s-r \»rlStSfWf9w* B/- -& 3. Counsel for the petitioners and the respondent No. 4 on notice heard. 4. it is argued on behalf of the petitioners thai the dispute specificaily fsjls under the categor/ of civil dispute or private nuisance and does not fal'i ynder section 133 of the Code of Cririiinal Procedure, 1973 (hsreinafter referred to as, "the Code"}. rf* 5. Copy of the documents filed on behaif of the petitioners perused. S. The Sub Oivssional Maciistrate is reauired to dispose of the cass in terms of section 133 to 143 of the Code. The matter is pending before the Sub Divisional Maaistrate for enauirv where the aopiicant msv aitege hls claim and defence and after fina! adjudication if he fseis aggrieved, he may recourse appropriate remedy availabie to him under the iaw. At this stage, no interference ss called for. 7. Consequentiy, the petition is dlsrnissed at the stage of admission. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge