! cF'i^ffls ^^. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C .0 WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 33S /2007 ,v- PETITIONER i^ \°€>?/ f^^^W Shre^.Devi Singh Dhruv S/o shri, Ram nath, age, 47years Presently working as Asst. Teacher In Govt. Higher Sec.School, Risda (Baloda Bazar), Disst. Raipur (C.G) .fS' RESPONDENT 1. State of Chattisgarh Through -Secretary Deptt. Of Education Mantralya D.K.SAhawan, Raipur.(C.G) .2. DjstrictEducation Officer, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chattisgarh. ^3. Block Education Officer, Bhatapara, Distt. Raipur Chattisgarh WRIT PETETION UNDER ARTICLE 226/327 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA_j'OR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OFMANDAMUS, CERTIORARI ETC. XI-HC-78 aii^T^irf^rNi (I2IT3TI^Tai*1 Qopd a TS( •^ww^^farKww, l°idi«y <^+,^ »1T*t^n SfWTqi i, Q^^-05^.33J/°^ ^J^...................../^ ^QQ sn^r'ra'sF (<^ig^£T) s^rrwHfeTsn^r 22-1.2007 Mr. Deepak Jain, ^4r. Wvek| Siddk|ue, Mr. Mahfooj Alanji, Somkant Vsrma and Mr. Mftnewh the petitioner(s). Mr. Sushil Dubey, Goivemnjient Advocat®, Gupta, Deputy Governmenf Dubey, Panel Lawyer forth|e Statc/respomlents <tii<i[ii'in-f iiicil'ffteEil'<Rf<<;i< ^? aif^T •an^rr Verma, Mrs. Hamida i, Mr. Rakesh Anttiony, Mr. Sharma, counsel for s, Mr. SaUsh Advocate and Mr. ftiwnd counsel appearing for the parties, the lof. Writ PeBtfon (S.) No.322 of 2007 in Wrth the consent of teamefl matter is heard finally and dispos^d Common order dictated ii|i open Court, passed separately. A copy of this order be pla|sed on the re<»rdof ttw connected writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge P.T.O. f^" HIGH COURT OF GHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR SINGUE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. "fc^ PeUtioner WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.322 OF 2007 Raj Kapoor Kesharwani versus Respondents : State of Chh^isgarh and another PelUoner WRIT PETmON (S.l NO.MS OF M07 Devi Smgh Dhruv versus Respondents : StateofCMiattegarhandrtheis PeBUoner WRIT PETITION (S.t N0.342 OF SQ07 Sanat Kumar Ohandrrior versus Respondents : Stateof ChhatHsgarhand othera WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.3430F 2607 Petitionere Respondents Versus Smt.Ganga Gilahre and others Ststo <rf C.G. and others Petitionere WRTT PETITION (S.»N0.34»OF2007 Gokul Ram SE^IU and another versus Respondents : State Govt of ChhatUs^rh and others Petitioner Resoondente WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.352 OF 2007 Smfc M.B. Banjara vereus Govemmentof ChhatBsgarh and others WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.353 OF 2W7 Petitioner Resoondents versus Yad Ram Banjare State Govwnment ofGhhattisgarh and othere WRIT PETITION (S.1 N0^312 OF 2006 PeUtioner Resoondents vereus htagendra Kumar Actarya Stateofhtedbya Pradesh Chhattisgart^ and others WRIT PETITION (S.t N0.46880F 2005 Petitioner : Idiwar Lal Kuiflam Versus Respondente : ^iteofChhatti^iarhandottiers PjgUUoBer WRTT PETITION (S.) N0.6076 OF 2005 Heeraman Sin^n KsBhysy yersys Responderrts : State of ChhatBsgarh and othere Present : Mr. Deepak Jain, Mr. Vivek Verma, Mis. Hamfda Siddkiue, Mr. Mahfooj Alam, Mr. Rakesh Anthony, Mr. Somkant Verma and Mr. Maneesh Sharma, coureel for the petiConer(s). Mr. Sushil Dubey, GovemmentAdvocate, Mr. &itich Gupta, Deputy Govemment Advocate and Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer fortheState/re^ondents. ORDER ind (Passed on 22"°Day ofJanuary, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the i^rties jeintly submtt ttiat the facts and question of taw involved ln,,the present bateh of writ petiUons are squarely covered by the deeision ofthis Court In the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadw^j vs. Muntelpal Coiporatton, Dwg andanoffiwa. 1 2. In subsequent csses, t.e., Writ P^tlon ^.) No.4130 ef 2005 (Sppesft Kumar Vwma vs. The Stete Govt af CMiaWsyarii and anotte»)and other connected matteis, dedded by thfe Court on 15-12-2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondary Educatien, Bhopal and the prospectus of Diploma in EducaUon ExaminaUoH, it was clarifiat that the nomenclature of the Basic Training InsUtute, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed and renamed as Dlploma in Education, i.a., D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ PeUUon (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Venna vs. TheStete Gavt. ofChfta(ttegarf»andanotbe»)(Supra). 3. For ttie aforementioned reasotre, ttie writ peUtions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Cnirt fn the matter of Yashwant Kumar BharKlwai (Supra), subject to verificatton of the tart as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed^.T.IJD.Ecl. Certfficates at their own expenses as per the circutere dated 24-12- ^906 and 1-3-1999 and further whether they hawe been paid two advance incremente or not. No order as to costs. Qopal 4. A copy of this order be ptaced on the record of the connected writ petltions. —- . _._ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 2006 (II) MPJR-CG 98 r