Crl. Misc No. M 4244 OF 2011 ****** Dalip Saini vs State of Haryana Present : Mr. S.K.Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmohan Sikka, DAG Haryana for the respondent. ******* The petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.32, dated 26.1.2011, registered under Sections 379, 188, 353, 186 of the IPC, at Police Station Tauru, District Mewat. On 10.2.2011, the following order was passed :- “ Learned counsel for the petitioner states that allegations against the petitioner are mainly under Sections 186 and 188 IPC and he is in no way concerned with the allegations under Section 379 IPC, which is the main offence, and under Section 353 IPC. Notice of motion. On being asked, Mr. Manmohan Sikka, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to supply two copies of the petition to the counsel opposite during the course of the day. Adjourned to 22.02.2011.” Counsel for the respondent, on instructions from ASI Manphool Singh, has accepted the statement of fact made by counsel for the petitioner. He, however, states that the petitioner should join the investigation. In my opinion, the petitioner should be granted the concession of anticipatory bail. Consequently, the petitioner is directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on 25.2.2011 between 10 am to 5 pm or any other subsequent date which may be required by the Investigating Officer, Crl.Misc No. M4244 of 2011 : 2 : and in the event of his arrest, the Investigating Officer shall release him on anticipatory bail to his satisfaction subject to the conditions contained in Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) February 22, 2011. JUDGE `kk'