1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO: 5908/2007 (Shrikant Myakalwar vs. Dy. Director of Education Amravati and others) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram Court's or Judges Order appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders. .................................................................................................................................................................. CORAM: D.D. SINH A & Smt. V.A.NAIK , JJ. DATED: 22nd January, 2008. *** Heard Mr. Anupam De, learned counsel for petitioner and Mr. Jichkar, learned AGP for Respondents 1 to 4. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner states that the petitioner had applied for admission to first year D.Ed. course for the academic session 2007-08 from the category of 'calamity stricken' ( i.e. people who have come under calamity because of unforseen circumstances). It is contended by the learned counsel for petitioner that though the petitioner belongs to the said category, his application has been rejected by the Competent Authority without any justification, ignoring the fact that the petitioner belonged to the said category. 2 3. We asked the learned counsel for petitioner to demonstrate whether the certificate issued by the Tahsildar in this regard, as required as per the admission Rules, particularly Clause 18.9, was submitted by him along with the application. However, the learned counsel was not in a position to demonstrate this fact. In absence thereof, rejection of the application form of the petitioner by the Competent Authority from the said category, cannot be said to be bad in law. 4. In the circumstances, Petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE sahare