IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 19TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 28TH BHADRA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 1310 of 2003(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN OP.29066/2002 Dated 28/07/2003 .................... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS IN THE O.P. -------------------------------------------------- 1. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT EMPLOYEES, ASSOCIATION (CITU) REGN.NO.40/67, AZHIKODAN MEMORIAL BUILDING, MANJALIKULAM ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REP. BY THE GENERAL SECRETARY, SRI.K.K.DIVAKARAN, S/O.NARAYAN NAMBOODIRI(LATE) AGED 57 YEARS. 2. SAJOY.W. S/O.WILFRED THOMAS, AGED 24 YEARS, WORKING AS RESERVCE CONDUCTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CITY DEPOT AND RESIDING AT WILLS HOUSE, KURUVINMUKAL. MACHEL PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.N.UNNIKRISHNAN RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.1 IN THE O.P.: ------------- SRI.C.K.APPUTKUTTAN NAIR, S/O.CHELLAPPAN NAIR, AGED 63 YEARS, MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADDL. RESPONDENT: 2. SRI.T.P.SENKUMAR, I..P.S., S/O.LATE T.PRABHAKARAN, WORKING AS MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSRTC, TRANSPORT PHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. (IMPLEADED AS ADDL. RESPONDENT NO.2 AS PER ORDER DATED 18.7.2008 IN IA 405/2008 IN COC 1310/2003) BY ADV. SHRI.JOHNSON P.JOHN, SC, KSRTC FOR RESPONDENT THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, J. ----------------------------------------- CONTEMPT CASE (C) NO.1310/2003-S ----------------------------------------- JUDGMENT The petitioners have moved this contempt application, alleging that the direction issued in Annexure-1 judgment has not been obeyed by the K.S.R.T.C. The present Managing Director of the K.S.R.T.C has filed a counter affidavit in this contempt application and has produced Annexures-R3(a) to R3(c) documents, which would show that the Managing Director has issued necessary directions for implementation of the orders of this Court in Annexure-1 judgment. So, there is substantial compliance of the direction issued by this Court. Accordingly, the contempt application is closed. But, if any incumbent has not received the arrears of salary or other benefits flowing from Annexure-1 judgment, he will be free to work out his remedy. 19th September, 2008. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. Nm/