1%. C/§:“M/ $ingle Benc“ i IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION ($)_NO. lgim OF 2011 PETITIONERS : 1. Abdul Rasid S/o. Shri Abdul Rahim, aged about 39 years, 2. Surjan S/o. Shri Punnu Lal, aged abouf 33 year's, 3. Harjeef Singh, S/o. Shri Vishal Singh, aged about 33 years, 4. Mohan Soni, S/o. Shri Tulsi Ram, Aged abou‘r 33 years, 5. Uma Tamrakar D/o. Shri Ganesh Tamrakar, aged about 47 year's, 6. Mohan Soni, S/o. Shri Naranayan Soni, Aged abouf 36 years, 7. Mukesh Soni, S/o. Shri Kishori Soni, aged abouf 25 years, 8. Ni‘resh Soni S/o. Shri Kishori Soni, Aged about 28 years, Jymi W/o. Shri Babulal, aged about 25 years, 10. Anita W/o. Shri Sukhdeo, aged abou‘r 3O years, 11. Narsammo, W/o. Kurpa Rao, aged about 35 years, 12. Vohan S/o. Shri Samuel, aged about 3O years, 13. Suresh S/o. Balesh Kumar, aged about 35 years, 14. 15. 16. 17. @ 7, Suresh S/o. Shri Ramamo, Aged about 27 years, Dhar‘am Rathore, S/o. Shri Veer Sai, Aged abou’r 25 year's, Lakhan S/o. Shri Chho‘r’ran, Aged abouf 35 years, Dippu, S/o. Shri $uresh,_ aged abou’r 20 ears, y Gorraiya, S/o. Shri Subbaiya, aged about 4O years,- Jansan, S/o. Krishna, aged abouf 24 years, Mahesh S/o. Shri Chho‘rtan, aged 20. about 28 years, 21. 18. 19. Babu S/o. Jamis, aged abouT 20 years, Rajkumar S/o. Bhajanlal, Aged 41 22. years, Janwari, S/o. Chho‘relal, aged 23. about 35 years, 24 Raisingh, 5/0. Ramsingh, aged about 26 years, Sanjay S/o. Bhaiyyalal, aged about 25. 32 years, Duryodhan, S/o. Preetam Singh, 26. Aged about 34 years, Kunwar Singh,$/o. Charnu Singh, 27. Aged about 26 years @ 3 Jagdish S/o.5hri Jivanlal, Aged abouf 3O years, Ramvishal S/o.5hri Kama! Singh, aged about 38 years, Mohd. Salim, S/o. Mohd. Jalil, aged abouf 42 year‘s, L Chefan Rao, S/o. Ramr'ao, aged about 18 years, Jailsingh, S/o. Shri Veer Singh, aged about 40 years, Panchram, S/o. 5hri Hridayyai, aged abouf 40 years, Saurav Tiwari, S/o. Shri Kaushal Tiwari, aged abou‘r 20 years, Maiku S/o.5hri Mo?ilal, aged abouf 39 years, Ramprasad, S/o. Komal Singh, Aged abou’r 28 years, Infakhaf S/o. Mukhmr Hussain, Aged abouf 28 years, Surmendra S/o. Harisingh, Aged abouf 24 years, Ashok S/o. Bhuneshwar Singh, aged abouf 24 years, Raj S/o. Shri Sundar Singh, Aged abouT 25 years, Mahajan S/o.$hri Sambhu Singh, Aged about 24 years,- 28. 32 29. 30. 31. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. @ w 42. Marry, W/o. Ismile, aged abou‘r 3O years, All are daily wages employees ‘working in different posfs in various deparfmenfs of Nagar Panchayal' Gaurela, Disfl'. Bilaspur (C.6.) VERSUS I,“ RESPONDENTS : 1. The Sfa‘le of Chha‘H‘isgar‘h, through The Principal Secretary, Deparfmenf of Urban Administrafion and Development Mantralaya aT D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Under Secrefary, Departmem‘ of Urban Administralion and Development Mantralaya a? D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (6.6.) / 3. Nagar Panchayal Gaurela, Through its Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayaf Gaurela, Disfricf- Bilaspur (6.6.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA @ HIGH COURT OF CHHA'I'I‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 1874 of20 11 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTI’I‘I ITION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Present: Shri Shashank Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner. x Shri Sushi! Dubey, Government Advocate for the State/ respondent No. 1 and 2. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 11 day of April, 2011) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly and fairly submit that the issue involved in the present petition as well as in Virendra Das Manikpurz' & Others v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Othersj which was considered and decided by‘this Court on 10.02.2011, are identical. Thus, the instant petition is squarely covered by the order passed by this court in Virendra Dax 'Manikpurl‘ & Others] . 2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel appearing for the patties, this petition is disposed ofin terms ofthe order passed in Virendra Das Manikpuri & Othersi. “WM/,1, Sd/4 ‘ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge m 1W. P.(S) No. 7450 of 201 0, decided on 10.02.2011 PETITIONER Abdul Rasid & Others. VERSUS RESPONDENTS The State of Chhattisgarh & Others.