IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST MAY 2008 / 31ST VAISAKHA 1930 WP(C).No. 13790 of 2008(S) --------------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ C.C.SOMASUNDARAN, MEMBER, PUDUKKAD GRAMA PANCHAYATH, (SPECIAL GRADE), S/O.CHIRAKUZHY CHARU, P.O.PUDUKKAD, THRISSUR DIST. BY ADV. SRI.U.O.JOSE RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. 3. THE GEOLOGIST (DEPT. OF MINING AND GEOLOGY), THRISSUR. BY GOVERNMENT PELADER SRI.M.P.SREEKRISHNAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & M.C. HARI RANI, J. ------------------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.13790 OF 2008-S ------------------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 21st day of May, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu, C.J. In our opinion, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is premature. We say so, for the reason that expressing his grievances, the petitioner had filed representation before the Ist respondent on 18-4-2008 and the same was received by the respondent on 19-4-2008. Even before the authorities could react, the petitioner has rushed to this Court on 28-4-2008 for certain directions to be issued to the respondents. The petitioner ought to have waited for some time for his representation being considered by the respondents. If for any reason, there was enormous delay in considering the representation so filed, the petitioner could have approached this Court for appropriate direction. (2). In that view of the matter, we decline to entertain this writ petition, for the present. Accordingly, it is rejected. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approach this Court, at appropriate time. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE (M.C.HARI RANI) JUDGE MS