IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3257 of 2007 AWADHESH SAHANI, son of Rajendra Sahani, resident of village Kusahi, PS Patepur, District Vaishali ….. Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Secretary, Department of Animal Husbandry and Fisheries, Bihar, Patna 3. The Secretary, Department of Co-operation, Bihar, Patna 4. The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bihar, Patna 5. The Director, Fisheries, Bihar, Patna 6. The Deputy Director, Fisheries, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur 7. The Deputy Registrar (Judicial), Co-operative Societies, Bihar, Patna 8. The District Co-operative Officer, Vaishali 9. The District Fisheries Officer, Vaishali 10.Maudah Chatur Matasyajivi Swawlambi Sahkari Samiti Limited, through its President Ram Brichch Sahani, district Vaishali ………. Respondents ******* 02- 16.1.2009 None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned JC to Standing Counsel no.11. Respondent no.10 herein had earlier preferred CWJC No. 10165 of 2005 (Maudah Chatur Matasyajivi Swabalambi Sahkari Samiti Ltd. vs. State of Bihar & Ors.) raising two fold grievances. Its first grievance was with regard to cancellation of settlement of three jalkars earlier made in its favour. Its second grievance was against a notice dated 3.5.2005 asking it to show cause why settlement of 33 jalkars earlier made in its favour should not be cancelled. The writ petition was disposed by order dated 5.9.2005 (Annexure 5), whereby respondent no.10 (the petitioner therein) as well as respondents therein were directed to appear before the Registrar, Co-operative Societies, for disposal of their grievances. The - 2 - High Court had also given liberty to the Registrar to assign the matter to any other competent authority. The application of respondent no.10 herein has since been allowed by order, dated 26.12.2006 (Annexure 6), whereby the cancellation of 3 jalkars as well as the proposed show cause notice for cancellation of 33 jalkars, have been recalled. It appears to me that the impugned order has been passed for valid reasons assigned therein. 2. The writ petition is dismissed. ( S K Katriar ) mrl