'€' f' BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH^M BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^0^ /2008 fS.B.) & ^^rr' PETITIONER Smt. Suchita Singh, wife of Shri Ravindra Nath Deo, aged about 32 years, Jb...<?3^ resldent of Behind Veterinary Hospital - ..""' Jyotipur, Tah. Pendra Road, Distt ^" . ^•""^ l^<... ^" ^^••- '^"" RESPONDENTS 1. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, DKS Bhawan, Mantrataya, Raipur (C.G.) State Level Committee for Scrutiny of Caste Certificate through its Secretar/, Pt Ravishankar Shukla University Compound, Raipur (C.G.) Collector, BJIaspur (C.G.) Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat - Gaurela, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.j^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIOIN OF INDIA Ir Amit HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 1904 of 2008 PETITIONER : Smt. Suchita Singh. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. PETITION UNDER ARnCLE2260FTHECQNSTITUTIONOFrNt31A SB:HQn'bIeShriSatishK^A2nihptri,J, Present: Shri Ashok Soni, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.S.Kachhwaha, Dy. A.G. with Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Dy. G.A. and Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No. 1 lo 3 Shri Sandeep Dubey., Advocate forthe respondent No. 4. ORDERCQRALl (Passed on 06th day of September, 2010) 1. Grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent No.2-High Povvcc Caste Scrutiny Committee {for short <(the Commitfee)i) has c^ncetled the caste certificate of the petitioner vide order dated 10.09,2007 (Annexure P/l) which was issued by the competent authority on llie ground that the petitioner has failed to produce any docunieirls showing him to be of'Tanwar" caste. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly and fairly submit that this case is squarely covered by the decision o(' this Court rendered in Dinesh Kumar Bhagoria v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others and other connected matters, wlierein this Court afiter considering all the aspects of the matter and after considering the law laid down by the Supreme Court in urnpteen number ofthe cases, in para 26 ofthe judgment and order has niaclc certain clarifications for verification ofthe caste certificate. 3. In view offoregoing, the writ petition is disposed of. The Committee is directed to proceed in accordance with the decision of this Court rendered m Dinesh Kumar Bhagoria (supra) and other connected matters. ; Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge WP (S) No.3338 of 2007 decided on 19-8-2010