IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.107 of 2010 Yogendra Kumar Yadav @ Yogendra Kumar, son of Saryug Yadav, resident of Village- Karra Police Station-Laxmipur, District- Jamui. ……………………………….Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar………………………..Opposite Party. ----------- 5. 21. 04. 2010. Heard the parties. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 183/2008 dated 18. 11. 2008, registered under Sections 498 A, 307 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code as also Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. In compliance of the order dated 05. 04. 2010, the petitioner and the informant are physically present in the Court and have been duly identified by their respective lawyers. When the matter was heard on 05. 04. 2010, it was submitted by the parties that there are still possibilities of compromise either for restoration of matrimonial relationship between the petitioner and the informant or for one time settlement of the entire dispute. Unfortunately, when the matter was taken up today for final disposal, then it was informed by the parties that compromise could not be arrived at, though at one point of time, some sorts of agreement had been arrived at between the petitioner and O.P. No. 2. This Court inquired from the petitioner and the informant about the possibilities of compromise. But from the statement made by the informant, it appears that she is a lady of fickle mind and she keeps her stand changing frequently. At one 2 point of time, she says that she wants restoration of matrimonial relationship, but at other point of time, she wants one time settlement of the entire dispute. The petitioner is a student of M.B.A. and is residing at Gajiabad in a hostel. He shows his willingness to restore his matrimonial relationship with the informant, but explains his difficulties in keeping the informant with him in the hostel, though, he is prepared to keep the informant as his legally wedded wife at his paternal house. Be that as it may, in the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the fact that the informant is a lady of fickle mind, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, namely, Yogendra Kumar Yadav @ Yogendra kumar, shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 183/2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. m.p. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)