1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 266 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 266 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 266 OF 2006 Mahadeo Jokhai Yadav ... Petitioner Versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. M.C. Shah i/by R.R. Shah for Petitioner. Mrs. P. Purandhare for R. No. 1. Mr. G./D. Utangale for R. No. 2. Mr. D.S. Sakhalkar for R. No. 5. Mr. H.S. Anand for R. No. 6. Mr. Milind MOre, A.G.P. for R. No. 4. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & A.V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : MARCH 07, 2006 DATED : MARCH 07, 2006 DATED : MARCH 07, 2006 P.C. . The Petitioner claims tobe rehabilitated under the S.R.A. Scheme. His right has not been determined. As application was made by Mr. Sadanand Mahadeo Yadav, son of the Petitioner Mahadev Yadav. That application has been rejected. The present petition, is by the father Mahadev Yadav . As noted earlier, Mahadev Yadav has not moved the competent authority for ascertaining his claim. 2 In these circumstances, the petition as filed would be premature. . It will be open to o the Petitioner to make claim before the competent authority which is Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. If the Petitioner applies to the competent authority within the period of two weeks from today, the competent authority concerned to dispose of the same within four weeks thereafter. . With the above directions, petition stands disposed of. . We make it clear that we have not decided any rights of the parties. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (A.V. MOHTA,J.) (A.V. MOHTA,J.) (A.V. MOHTA,J.)