FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Family Court Appeal No.74 of 1996 With Family Court Appeal No.75 of 1996 With Family Cou9rt Appeal No.45 of 1997 ------------------------------------:----------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:------------------------------------ Mr.Shelke for Mr.A.A.Kumbhakoni for appellant. Mr.Sachin Chavan for Mr.S.S.Kulkarni for respondent. ---- CORAM : H.L GOKHALE & CORAM : H.L GOKHALE & CORAM : H.L GOKHALE & SMT.R.S.DALVI, JJ. SMT.R.S.DALVI, JJ. SMT.R.S.DALVI, JJ. DATED : 26th September 2005 DATED : 26th September 2005 DATED : 26th September 2005 P.C. : 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties in all the above three Appeals. 2. All these three Appeals arise out of a judgment and order dated 13th May 1996 passed by the Judge of the Family Court at Pune in three proceedings which were heard and decided together. Principally, the Family Court had dismissed the Petition for restitution of conjugal rights filed by the appellant-husband. There was an order of maintenance and there was also an order on the Custody Petition which was dismissed. 3. These three matters were adjourned from time to time. During the course of the proceedings, an affidavit has been filed by the appellant-husband that the dispute no longer survives and the appellant and the respondent are staying together happily. That affidavit is affirmed on 20th September 2005. In view of this affidavit, we adjourned the matter to today’s date for the respondent’s Advocate to take instructions. We had hoped that the parties will remain present in Court. 4. Mr.Chavan, learned Counsel appearing for the respondents, informs that he has been instructed by the respondent’s father that the statements in the affidavit are correct and that the respondent is now staying happily with the appellant. 5. In view of what is stated above, the parties have, in fact, united and these Appeals are not required to be pressed. All the three Appeals stand disposed of. (H.L.GOKHALE, J.) (H.L.GOKHALE, J.) (H.L.GOKHALE, J.) (SMT.R.S.DALVI, J.) (SMT.R.S.DALVI, J.) (SMT.R.S.DALVI, J.)