THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.1921 of 2010 Date:07.02.2011 Between: Shaik Mabu and another ..... Petitioners AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Secretary, Revenue Department, and others .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri A. Rajendra Babu Counsel for Respondents: Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue The Court made the following: ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 27.09.2010 in W.P.No.18713 of 2010. This Court by the said order, while disposing of the writ petition, held that it is obligatory on the part of respondent No.3 to dispose of the petitioners’ representation and accordingly directed respondent No.3 to consider the petitioners’ representation and give appropriate reply within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Complaining that this order has not been complied with, the present Contempt Case is filed. In the counter-affidavit filed by respondent No.3, it is inter alia stated that in pursuance of the order of this Court, he has caused enquiry and found that the land in question is a Government land, that it is being used for Government purpose for construction of educational institutions and that the said land was not assigned to the petitioners by way of issuing D-Form pattas. It is further stated that the photo copies of D-Form pattas filed by the petitioners are fake and that he has passed an order in his proceeding Rc.B.224/2009 dated 13.01.2011 to the above effect. Respondent No.3 has filed a copy of the said proceeding. The learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that his clients have not received the said proceeding. Inasmuch as this Court directed respondent No.3 to consider the petitioners’ representation and pass an appropriate order and respondent No.3 is stated to have passed an order, a copy of which is enclosed to the counter-affidavit, the plea of the petitioners that respondent No.3 has committed violation of this Court’s order cannot be accepted. If the petitioners feel aggrieved by the proceeding dated 13.01.2011 issued in pursuance of the orders of this Court, they are entitled to avail appropriate remedy. Subject to the above observations, the Contempt Case is dismissed. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 07th February, 2011 GHN