^ ? / . ^ c^- i^^I -^! ' •.' :;i'^y^ ll9 0@P@io BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) ^) W.P. fS) N0. of2011 PETITIONER (\^^ .^-,Q'<%;\L...<- <@lp..v^-:>'0^:; ^><^^' ^^y'" '»'<;.. '^•"" RESPONDENTS : M.R. Gaikwad, Son of late M.D. Gaikwad, aged about 62 years, R/o. Kududand, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^" 2. Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. Tahsildar, Bilaspur, Tahsil & District Bilaspur (C.G.), WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^TI^T ^T f^^ich ^rm ST^T sb^i°h " *llNCrll VhWQh 'S^sf ^ww^, ^ti1-H4l<o, f®l<rtl'<-i^< —....^.:..£-:.&2.^:..3J.^ll f»w^ ^s 200 W^T 'q^T ( ^|(^<^T) ^<TTW ^Tf^T ^TT^T SB : Hon'bie Shri Manindra M<bhan Shrivastava. J. 2Q"Q6^011 Shri Raghvendra Pradha^ Shri A.V. Shridhar, Panel] With the consent of learnl heard finaiiy. This case pertains to grie| retirai dues. Learned couns] instructions, submits that the m| <t)i^(<vt<i)i *ii^<!ill ^ Fs^l <f^t^j< ^3tRrH3;TT^T i, counsel for the petitioner. Lawyer for the State. sd counsei for the parties, the petition is ^ance arising on account of non-grant of ?i appearing for the petjtioner, on atter may be referred to the High Power Retiral Dues Committee. This Court, in VV.P.No.4^42/2004 (Baijnaih Mandai Vs. The Staie of Chhaiiisgarh & others) and| Committee to consider the M question of facts were involvedl State Government, pursuant to| other connected matters, directed the latter of retriai dues as the disputed The Committee was constltuted by the ithe order dated 19-06-2006 passed in W.P.No.1961/2006 (Smt. Keja ^ai Chandrakar Vs. Staie Govemmentof ChhaUisgarharid others), ar(d order dated 13-3-2008 passed in M.C.C. No.105 of 20Q8 (State {)f Chhattisgarh and oihers Vs. Baijnath Mandai and anothet). Thus, 1|iis petition is squareiy covered by the judgment and order date^ 31 January, 2008 passed in Vtf.P.No.4642/2004 (Baijnath iV(andal (supra) as submitted by iearned counsei appearing for the partie^. This petifion is according) office of the Advocate Gener^ y disposed of in the same terms i.e., the ii is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 1$ days from the date of receipt of copy of XI-HC—78 ^II^T ^r f^Nr ^T8n 3TT^T 9hHi<=b Deepti "i »(THdT«»*1ich 'Tocf ^TPTT^R, ^tll^41<o, [®|<ni^{^< . ^)^-(S')^o.Q)^r-/^ y Q? "^200 ^TT^T ^^K (lioif^<^r) ^<HW^f^T 31T^?T ^- this order. Thereafter, the Comnrl and officers concerned withinl Committee shail consider and p^ affording proper opportunity of ij ct)l^<yt<flT1 TTTTT^tf ^* "fe1c3t <R3l^l< '^3iRTH3?T^T ittee shali issue notice to the petitioner a further period of 15 days. The iss order, in accordance with law, after learing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may|fiie additionai documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, including (j)ayment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner, be completed within receipt of copy ofthis order. The petitioner shall suppi^ one compiete set of the petition to the State cpunsel as well as coLlnsel for the Accountant General for transferring the same to the Conimittee. With the aforesaid obserl/ations, the petition is finally disposed off. period of four months from the date of Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge