IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Second Appeal No : 1340 of 2008 Between: K.Bharathi ..... PETITIONER AND Ch.Veeraswamy and others. .....RESPONDENTS Order: The second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree of the learned VI Additional Senior Civil Judge (FTC), at Medchal, dated 30.10.2008, in A.S.No.120 of 2008 dismissing the appeal filed against the judgment and decree of the learned Junior Civil Judge, at Medchal, dated 03.07.2008, in O.S.No.21 of 2006. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant-plaintiff and the learned counsel for the respondents-defendants. Perused the judgments under second appeal. Both the Courts below, upon appreciation of the evidence on record, have concurrently found that the appellant as PW.1 has admitted in her cross-examination that the suit schedule property was the self acquired property of her father, late Balaiah, and that the appellant filed the suit in collusion with respondents 1 and 2, brothers, due to escalation of the land value. Further, the appellant has utterly failed to establish her joint possession along with respondents 1 and 2 over the suit schedule property. Accordingly, both the Courts below dismissed the suit filed by the appellant seeking partition of the suit schedule property. The conclusions arrived at by the Courts below being based on proper appreciation of evidence, no interference is called for by this Court with the judgments under appeal, in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and more particularly when there is no question of law, much less a substantial question of law involved in the second appeal. The second appeal is devoid of any merit, and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date:29.10.2009 VGB