:: 1 :: rpa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 116 OF 2007 REVIEW PETITION NO. 116 OF 2007 REVIEW PETITION NO. 116 OF 2007 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2713 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 2713 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 2713 OF 2007 ....................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda . of Coram, appearances, Court’s . Orders or directions and . Registrar’s Order Court’s or Judge’s Order ....................................................... Mr.R.G.Ketkar for petitioner. Mr.J.S.Kini for respondents. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 12TH OCTOBER, 2007. DATE : 12TH OCTOBER, 2007. DATE : 12TH OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- . Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. It is not the contention of the review petitioner that a mistake is committed by this Court while passing the order dated 28th July, 2007 appointing the court receiver. Admittedly, that order was passed with :: 2 :: consent given by both the parties. Mr. Ketkar, learned counsel for the Review Petitioner who is original respondent no. 1 had himself given the consent for the same. According to him he was not aware that earlier a request of appointment of receiver was rejected and therefore, by mistake he gave the consent. This is no ground to review the order passed by this Court on 28th July, 2007 with consent of the parties. The review petition stands dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA, J) (J.H.BHATIA, J) (J.H.BHATIA, J)