THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 3566 of 2007 ORDER: 1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order dated 18.06.2007 in E.P. No.1 of 2004 in O.S. No. 28 of 1998 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Srikakulam, whereunder and whereby attachment warrant was issued against the petition schedule property under Order XXI Rule 32 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘CPC’). 2. The petitioner herein is the judgment debtor no.4; first respondent herein is the decree holder and the respondents 2 to 4 herein are the judgment debtors 1 to 3, in the Execution Petition. 3. The first respondent herein is said to be tenant of the plaint schedule property in Original Suit No.28 of 1998 on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Srikakulam. He filed the suit against defendants/judgment debtors for perpetual injunction restraining them from interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property. The said suit was decreed on 22.1.2002 and the judgment and decree have become final. Therefore, so long as the injunction is in force, the defendants/judgment debtors have no manner of right of whatsoever to interfere with the possession of the first respondent. The evidence of P.Ws. 1 and 2 is very clear that the judgment debtors have interfered with the possession of the first respondent/decree holder. Therefore, the executing court rightly issued the attachment and the impugned order needs no interference by this Court. 4. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the application is filed under Section 83 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions & Endowments Act, 1987 before the Deputy Commissioner of Endowments for evicting the first respondent. But, that cannot be a ground to interfere with the possession of the first respondent over the plaint schedule property. 5. The Civil Revision Petition is devoid of merit and is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs. However, this order will not preclude the petitioner to evict the first respondent through process of court or in accordance with law. --------------------- (K.C.Bhanu, J.) 21.2.2011 DRK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 3566 of 2007 21.2.2011 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 3566 of 2007 21.2.2011 Between: The Executive Officer, Sri Kodandarama Alayam, Palakonda Road …Petitioner And Nagireddi Balarama Swamy & others …Respondents