HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. Revisioners Respondents Non^apDlicant Appellant Non-apDlicant Respondent No.3. Civil Revision No. 57 of 2008 1. Santu Ram S/o Kewta DhoN, aged about 50 years, occupation-cultivator 2. Baosu Ram @ Bantu S/o Kewla Dhobi, aged about 45 y^rs, occupation-cultivator Both are R/o VHIage Dhapna (Sohagpur), Post Karanjee, Tah. Surajpur, Distt. Sarguja (CG) Versus : 1. Babulal son of Late Beegan Dhobi, aged about 50 years, occupation- Cultivator, R/o Vill. Cher, Tah.Baikunthpur. Distt. Korea (CG) 2. State of Chhattisgarh through the Collector. Distt. Korea Civil revision under Section 115 ofthe C.P.C. 1988. Present: Shri A.K. Shukla, counsel for the applicants. Shri G.D. Vaswani, G.A. for ttie State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 16.04.2008) Heard on admission. (2) The only ground urged by the learned oounsel fw ttie applicants in this revision is that the lower AppeMate Court erred in allowir^i the application under Section 5 of fiie Limitation Act v^thout there being any affidavit in support ttiereof and v^ttiout there being any medical ceriificate filed by the non-applicant/defendant. (3) I have perused ttie impugned order dated 07.03.2008 pSBsed by the District Judge, Baikunttipur, Distt. Korea in mtscetlaneous cMI case No.01/2Q07. The learned District Judge has given cogent reasons for allowing the application under Section 5 of the Limltation Act and alsw for taking liberal view. No such lllegality as would justity any C^4d -r^ -^) T ^ f^v interference M exerdse of revisional jurisdiction js seen in the impugned order. (4) Accordingly, this civtl revision No.57/2008 is dismissed at the stage of admission. (5) In view of the above, I.A. No.1 for grant of stay also stands dismissed. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge I.