Crl. Misc. No. M-21023 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-21023 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 6.9.2010 Mohammad Shamshad and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Kapil Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vikas Malik, AAG, Haryana for respondent No.1. Mr. R.K. Agnihotri, Advocate for respondents No.2 & 3. Rajan Gupta, J. (oral) The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.75 dated 29th May, 2006 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 323, 324, 452, 506 read with Section 34 IPC, registered at police station Chhachhrauli, District Yamuna Nagar, and the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2) arrived at between the parties. Complainant Hasina (respondent No.2) alongwith injured Noor Ahmed, her husband (respondent No.3) are present in Court. They are duly identified by their counsel. They have filed their respective affidavits in court today, which are taken on record as Mark 'A' and Mark 'B' respectively, wherein the factum of compromise dated 19th May, 2010 (Annexure P-2) arrived at between the parties has been Crl. Misc. No. M-21023 of 2010 2 admitted by them. They state that they have no objection if the present FIR is quashed. Learned State counsel submits that since the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement, the State would not stand in the way of quashing of the FIR on the basis of compromise. The compromise is in the interest of the parties and after the matter has been resolved by an amicable settlement, no useful purpose is likely to be served with continuance of the criminal proceedings. In view of the above, the present FIR and the consequent proceedings deserve to be quashed in the light of the decision of a Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab, 2007(3) RCR ( Crl.) 1052. Resultantly, the present petition is allowed, the FIR and the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 6.9.2010 'rajpal'