IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7527 of 2007 MUNESHWAR SAH, S/o Late Soti Lal Sah, Resident of Mohalla- Champanagar, Kishun Thakur Lane, Mahashay Dyorhi, Bangali Tola, P.S. - Nathnagar, Town and District – Bhagalpur. ........ Petitioner Versus 1. THE T.M.BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY , Bhagalpur, through its Registrar. 2. The Vice Chancellor, T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. 3. The Registrar, T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. 4. The Finance Officer, T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. 5. The Head, P.G. Department of Zoology, T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. 6. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 7. The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Finance, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 8. The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 9. The Director, Department of Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. ........ Respondents ----------- 9 22.06.2011 Heard Sri Purushottam Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Anil Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents/Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur and Sri Apurva Kumar, learned A.C. to Standing Counsel No. 12, who appears on behalf of respondent/State. Sri Anil Singh, while referring to Annexure 'E' to the supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of university, submits that most of the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed. On perusal of Annexure 'E', it appears, that some amount was due on the date of order of Annexure 'E'. Sri Purushottam Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner, is not in a position to inform the court as to whether the said amounts have been paid or not. So far as question of granting 50 % dearness relief on basic pay of the petitioner is concerned, the issue has already been settled in C.W.J.C. No. 3616 of 2010 (Dr. Himanshu Bhushan Vs T.M. Bhagalpur University & Ors.), disposed of on 3.12.2010, alongwith analogous writ petitions accordingly this writ petition is allowed in same terms. In view of the facts and circumstances, particularly the fact, that in the year 2009 order was passed for payment, the court is of the opinion that there is no need to further keep the matter pending. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. However, it is made clear, that if remaining amount as per Annexure 'E' has not been paid to the petitioner, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file representation before respondent nos. 2 & 3 i.e. Vice-Chancellor, T.M. Bhagalpur University as well as Registrar, T.M. Bhagalpur University respectively. If such representation is filed, both the aforesaid respondents are directed to take steps to make payment of the dues within one month from the date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction the writ petition stands disposed of. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)