IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 14.12.2011. CWP No. 23246 of 2011 Pavitar Kaur ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and ors …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA Present: Mr. Ramesh Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. Petitioner claims to be a bona-fide purchaser from Gurmukh Singh and Mohinder Kaur, the purchasers from Reena Syal and Ashwani Kumar Syal. It is the contention of the petitioner that the petitioner is a bona-fide purchaser for valuable consideration and without notice of any mortgage, as the original title deeds of sale executed by Reena Syal and Ashwani Kumar Syal in favour of Gurmukh Singh and Mohinder Kaur, are in his possession and that the revenue record does not reflect any transaction of mortgage. Petitioner has approached this Court without submitting any objections to the `Notice Inviting Tenders’ dated 14.11.2011 proposing auction on 16.12.2011. CWP No. 23246 of 2011 Since, the issue raised by the petitioner is factual in nature, we permit the petitioner to file the objections to the Notice Inviting Tenders. On submission of the objections, the Bank shall consider the same and communicate its decision to the petitioner. Any auction conducted in the meantime shall be subject to the decision on such objections. Disposed of. Copy of this order be given dasti under the signatures of the Bench Secretary. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 14.12.2011 (G.S. SANDHAWALIA) preeti JUDGE 2