IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC (T) No.: 7 of 2008. Decided on: 24.09.2010. __________________________________________________________ Kuldip Kumar Lath. … Petitioner. Versus S. Roy and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. K.C. Sankhyan, Advocate vice Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): It has come in para 2 of the reply filed by the respondents that the judgment in question has been implemented in letter and spirit. Consequently, the same is dismissed as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. September 24, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?