Eqi$ .-..-"nu-"nuuuuuu W 3WW (W) m 200 WWWWW V $Waném » through: Secretarv, through its Chief Mahasamund (CG) Collector Cum Chairman Education Guarantee Schema, Mahasamund, Distdct-Mahasamund {CG} WRET PETETIDN UE‘DER ARTECLE 226 OF THE CON$TITUTEON 0? ENDXA SE" EQ3€ $HRE DHERENBRA ME$HRA, J‘ G3-ll—2GD$ / Shri Abhay Kumar Tiwa ‘i, Advocate for the petitioners. Ajay x Shri n With the consent of 1e irneci counsel’for the pai‘tiest the oetition is 1naarci Anahy. r , State of Chhattisgarh, a, . dnvchéyat Department, D.K‘S. Bhawan) Rainur {CG} V Jammc ‘Panchaya Pi Execut ve Officar, Dist tJ- m Dwivadi, Dy‘ otate/responciente No. 1 to 8‘ Eff. is! No‘ 606912908 Tikes 1War Pradhan, aged abcut 38 yearS, S/o Jegdish Pradahem, Occu'wation-EX—Gumji umd-er tha ation Guarantae Scheme, R/o Khamhar arpara, Post-Patharra, Tahsil—Pithaura, Distr: Ct~I‘JI&hasaznLand (CG) Babulal Banjara, aged about 4:2 years, ‘S/o Shri Dhaniram E.G.E e, R/o Baniara Baiitaxé: Occupation:Ex—Guruii Tarapara,- Post~Pathér1a, Lmc‘k ’Iéhsis r the PithaJra, Disu‘ict—Mahsaamund (CG) Mu‘iciland -Jagat, aged about 32 years, S/o Shri Gyan ias Jagat, Occupation-EX—Guruji under the E,G.S., R/o Dongariyadipa, post Savitripur, Tahsil- Pitha Ha, District— Mahasamund (CG) Vijay‘ Kumar Nayak, aged about 32 years, S/o Shri Madam Lal Nayak, Occupation-Ex-Gur‘uji under the E.G.E‘, R/o Rawatdipe, Limdarha, post Limdai‘ha, Tahsii-Pitl'laura, District—Mahasamund (CG? Vex 5115 Government Advocate ii ‘ the Q mmm anéei ‘ I t r t ‘ v h PETITIONER$ l 3. 4. RESPONDENTS i. C -78 m Eqi$ mzoo amm(m) y mmmma w ? F WW§MW $Wsnésr Learned counsel empaa] amassing this Detitian at this : raspondent authorities} as giv Ram Patal and othars Vs. Stem to ci€cid6 th6 rem‘esentations authoriti63 in accordance with Learnted counssl for the petitiOn is disnosad of in tha af In vitew of abova subm. instam netitiml i$ diSposed 0f ‘ I‘em‘ewntatian before the com their griévénces, raisgd in this the ccmpetsnt authority of the the petitioners i‘n accordance 7.5.2008 passed by this Court In View of the above, the Certified copV as per rul i 'ing for the petitioners submits that he is not tage, hoWevei‘, he prays for a direction to the en by this Court in 'WP, No, 6127/98 (Mohit e of M.P( or, others} vide order dated 7.5.2008, (Annexures P—4 to P-6} pending before the iaW expeditiously. . State submits that he has no objection if the oresaid terms ssions of learned counsel for the parties, the vith a direction to. the oetitioners to make fresh )etent authoi‘itv of the respondents raising all petition On such representation being made, resnondents is directed to consider the ca se of With law and in the light of the order dated netition stands disposed of. /.V