Criminal Revision No.2553 of 2011(O&M) --1-- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.2553 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: November 16, 2011 Mahender Singh Dangi ....PETITIONER VERSUS State of Haryana and another ....RESPONDENTS ***** CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Saini, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for respondent No.1. Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. The revisionist challenges the judgment of conviction rendered by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Rohtak dated 12.06.2008 and order of sentence dated 13.06.2008. The petitioner has been convicted for commission of offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.2000/- and in default, further imprisonment for 15 days. The petitioner carried an appeal that has been dismissed by Additional Sessions Judge(FTC), Rohtak vide the other impugned judgment dated 08.10.2011. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent-complainant states that the cheque amount viz. `5 Lac has been received by the Criminal Revision No.2553 of 2011(O&M) --2-- respondent-complainant and, therefore, provisions of Section 147 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 be invoked and the offence be compounded. Respondent-complainant- Birmati Devi who is present in Court as identified by her counsel, Mr.Neeraj Kumar, having received the amount states that she does not want the petitioner to undergo any further agony. 3. Considering the stand of the complainant, the petition is allowed. The offence committed by the petitioner is hereby compounded. Release warrants be issued. (AJAI LAMBA) JUDGE November 16, 2011 sonika 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?