IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.35308 of 2010 Md.Anwar Versus State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- Lawyer for Petitioner- Mr. Vinay Ranjan- Adv. Lawyer for State- Mr. Ansarul Haque- A.P.P. ------------------------------------- 09. 27.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Torture for demand of dowry is the allegation. Differences appear otherwise as wife who was before this Court on notice refused to accompany this petitioner. Now, she is before Court with an original ‘NIKAHNAMA’ of second marriage of the petitioner with another lady apparently appears creation of a forged document, this much only entitles the petitioner for bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with Azam Nagar P. S. Case No.30 of 2010, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P. C. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.)