THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2580 of 2007 ORDER: The petitioner submitted objection/complaint dated 20.11.2006 and 3.02.2007 to the first respondent alleging that respondents 2 and 3 are conducting business in the neighbourhood, causing inconvenience and pollution. It was also alleged that respondents 2 and 3 do not have the required permission and licence to carry out such business. His grievance is that no action has been taken on the complaint submitted by him. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the first respondent. The petitioner on the one hand and respondents 2 and 3 on the other hand are the lessees of the premises held by the first respondent. It appears that respondents 2 and 3 have established a bakery. The grievance of the petitioner is that the smoke emanating from the bakery is causing inconvenience and pollution. This, however, is a matter, which needs to be taken into account by the first respondent. It can be verified as to whether the activity or business undertaken by respondents 2 and 3 are by any law. The complaint made by the petitioner cannot be kept pending for a long time. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider the objection/complaint dated 20.11.2006 and 3.02.2007 submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders within a period of two months form the date of receipt of a copy of this order, duly issuing notice to respondents 2 and 3. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ (L. Narasimha Reddy, J.) 4th November, 2009 Js.