... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1646 OF 2004 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.29732 OF 2003 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : JUNE 06, 2006. : JUNE 06, 2006. : JUNE 06, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocates appearing for the parties. Application is strongly opposed by the learned Advocate appearing for the Respondent. In view of the averments made in the Application, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. However, the Respondent will have to be compensated by awarding costs. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to condition of the Applicant paying costs of Rs.2,500/- to the Respondent within a period of a six weeks from today. Payment of costs will be condition precedent. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE