IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 9722 of 2008 Between: 1 N. Jagdish S/o. N. Krishna R/o. H.No. 3-1-42, Bagh Ameer, Kukatpally , Ranga Reddy District. 2 Nerudi Krishna S/o. Rukkaiah R/o. Bagh Ameer Village, Shamsuguda, Kukatpally , Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONERS AND The Deputy Collector & Tahsildar, Revenue Mandal Balanagar, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the inaction of the respondent to conduct demarcation and fixation of boundary work in respect of the lands bearing SY.No.237 extent of Ac 0-22 guntas, Sy.No. 242 extrent of Ac 0-20 guntas, Sy.No. 243 extent Ac 0-26 guntas and Sy.No. 244 extent Ac 2-28 guntas totally admeasuring Ac 4-16 guntas situated at Village Shamsuguda Kukatpally, Ranga Reddy District as illegal, null and void and consequently the respondent may be directed to take action to demarcation and fix boundaries of the said lands in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.MOHD. GHULAM HUSSAIN Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: It is the case of the petitioners that petitioner No.2 and others are the absolute owners and possessors of the land admeasuring Ac.4.16 guntas situated at Village Shamsuguda, Kukatpally, Ranga Reddy District having purchased the same under sale deed dated 6.5.1966. Since their neighbours are raising boundary dispute and trying to encroach upon their lands, they submitted an application to the respondents on 29.1.2008 to demarcate the said land. The grievance of the petitioners is that so far no action has been initiated on their representation to demarcate the land. Hence this writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Government Pleader for Revenue. Since the petitioners have already made a representation to the authorities to demarcate and fix the boundaries of the subject matter of the land on 29.1.2008 by paying all the requisite fees and the same is still pending, both the learned counsel agreed to dispose of the writ petition with the following direction. The respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 29.1.2008 to demarcate the land and fix the boundaries and dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. N.V.RAMANA,J DT.30.4.2008 msv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Deputy Collector & Tahsildar, Revenue Mandal Balanagar, Ranga Reddy District. 2. 2CCs to G.P for Revenue, High Court of A.P Hyd (OUT) 3 2CD copies