^Z.^^^^SB,.^^^^^^.^,^^.^^^ ''^-H^K ^' ^C.^f^U ^aa^tt yfc^i"M c.^Pi IN THE HON»BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) N0. '"f'3 M if /2009 PETITIONER ( RESPONDENTS r Smt. Shahnaj Khan (before marriage Ku. Kurdulla Panna) W/o Mohamniad Lal Khan, aged aboyt 54 years, working as Assistant Teacher, R/o P.0. Narayanpur, Police Station Narayanpur, Tahsil - Kunkuri, Block- Kunkuri, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secretary, School Education Deptt., D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer, Jashpur, Distt. - Jashpur (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Kunkuri, Block- Kunkuri, Distt.-Jashpur (C.G.) —— .^ /, TU y^. r-r^,^^ ^^y 4-. Treasury, Account 85 Pension Jashpur, Distt.- Jashpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDBR ARTICLE 226 OF THE rnwsTTTUTION OF INDIA. ^H^ ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITJON (S) N0. 7344 OF2009 Smt. Shahnaj Khan Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Articte 226 of the Constltution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Somkant Verma, counsel for ft»epetitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Adv. General for the State. ORDER{QRAU (Passed on this 16th day of December, 2009) 1. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the partaies, the petition is heard finally. 2. At the very outset, leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this petition js squarely covered by flie decision of this Court passed in W.P. (S) No.6257 of 2008 (Salit Kant Singh vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) and prays that similar relief roay be granted in case of the present petitioner also. 3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing for the State submits that in the event the petitioner submits a detailed representatjon the same shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law and in vi@w of the decision of this Court rendered in Salil Kant Singh (supra), subject to verification ef facte. 4. In view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, sd/- „ .. Gowri SatishK.Agnihotn Judge