l§_THE HIGH COURT QE.JUDIB TURE QI.BILASPUR (C.B.) Nuru Ng~[17 mi Aw IN THE MATTER DF i. BHAGAT SINEH SADIJA Vén aqmd mf abaut Léte 5# D$wandag year$ $adija ident mf $amta Emlwmy pur (Chhatti§g&rh) E" NAND LAL SADIJA $&g aqwm of 41 L&k; y$ar$, Dewandaa Sadija id$nt 0f Samta Calmny (Chhatti$garh) PETITIUNERS VERSUS STATE DF CHHATTISEARH Raipu; thrmuqh ( hha£tié;géh)4 the V011&CLDV. THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, Raipur (Chhatti$garh) United Commercial Bank, & bady carparata can$tituted under thw Banking Cwmwaniaa (Qmqui$itinn & Transfar of Undertakinga) ct intmr ..... alia ammngat athwr branches a branch at 6.E~Raad, Rainur RESPGNDENTS wRIT PETITIDN UNDER ARTICLE 22$I227 QE_THE CQNSTITUTIGN QE_INDIA R- AW. , 1ft; .._,,_._. s ' 370 HIGH COX TRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT EH ,ASPI JR WRIT PETITION No. 47 of 2900 PETITIONERS Bhagat Singh Sadija & Another. VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgaxh & Othars, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CQNS’I‘ITUTION OF INDIA SB: H0n’h1e Shri Satish K. Agnihotri‘ .L Presem: Shri Kshitij Shaw-ma, Advocate fnr the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhadun', Fanei Lawyer for the State/respontienl N0. I & 2. 3' i Shii .J,N.Nande, Advocaie for the respondent No. 3. K 0 R I) E R (Passed on 22“ day ofNovember, 20} 1) 1. Leameii counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the respondent. Nor 3, by letter dated 07:12.2002 (Annexure A) has already withdrawn the revenue recovery case flied on 30.032000 2w addressed to the Tahsildar, with permission to pursue remedy before the Debts Recovery TribunaL Jabalpur, and thereaftera by proceeéjngs dated 13.012003 (Annexure B; the case was withdrawn. In View of that, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 2t Learned counsel appearing for other side does not oontrovert. the 2t above submission, 3, In view‘ofthe above, the writ petition stands disposed of.