IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 27TH MARCH 2008 / 7TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 34012 of 2007(Y) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- V.P.ABDUL JABBAR, S/O V.K.PAREETH, VETTAKKAYAM, NADAKKAL P.O., EARATTUPETTA. BY ADV. SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SR.), ADV. SRI.S.SUJIN. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. TALUK LAND BOARD, MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD. 2. TAHSILDAR, MANNARKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 3. VILLAGE OFFICER, PALAKKAYAM VILLAGE, MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD. 5. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVT., GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/03/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.34012/2007-Y: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT DTD. 07/03/1990 IN O.P. NO. 5588/88. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT DTD. 11/08/2005 IN O.P. NO. 8792/97. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE NOTICE DTD. 17/10/2006 ISSUED BY THE R.3. VILLAGE OFFICER, PALAKKAYAM TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE PETITION DTD. 06/01/2007 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.4. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) 34012 of 2007 ------------------------------------- Dated: MARCH 27, 2008 JUDGMENT The grievance of the petitioner appears to be that the property in Sy.No.2261 which is mentioned in Ext.P1 is sought to be taken over in order to make up the deficit in the land that was surrendered by the petitioner's father in pursuance to the order passed by the Taluk Land Board, under the Kerala Land Reforms Act. 2. It is seen that pursuant to Ext.P2 judgment of this court, the matter was considered by the 3rd respondent and the representation made has been rejected. Aggrieved by the said order, petitioner submits that Ext.P4 representation has been made to the 4th respondent and in this writ petition what is sought for is a direction to the 4th respondent to consider the same. 2. If, as stated by the petitioner, Ext.P4 has been received and is pending consideration of the 4th respondent, it is for the 4th respondent to consider and pass orders thereon. Accordingly, I WP(C) 34012/07 Page numbers dispose of this writ petition directing that the 4th respondent shall consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 if the same has been received and is pending, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-