X^/L_A ^ cf i^2- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C .0 )sns WRIT PETITION (S) N0., f^'f / 2007 ^mw T's ? s^.s !£NI.I- PETITIONER ^.v^^'. ^^^ V-" rt^\ :'-• Ksvn^ ^' \> ^.^' ^y ^°". RESPONDENT Shree. Rameshwar prasad manhre S/o shri, Hari Das, age, 46years Presently working as Asst. Teacher In, Primary school Khamradeeh, Disst. Raipur(C.G) 1. State ofChattisgarh Through -Secretary Deptt. OfEducation Mantralya D.K.S.bhawan, Raipur.(C.G) .2. District Education Officer, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chattisgarh. 3. Block Education OfEcer, Bhatapara, Distt. Raipur Chattisgarh WRIT PETETION UNDER ARTICLE 226/fi^' OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OFMANDAMUS. CERTIORARI ETC. \ HISH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLEJSaR._SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. Petittoner WRIT PETITION (S.l NQjKS OF 2007 Charan Singh Thakur versus Respondents : State of ChhatUsgarh and others Petitioner WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.6S1 OF 2007 Shree Rameshwar Prasad Manhre versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarti and othere Present : Mr. N.P.Koshta and Mr. Vivek Verma, counsel for the petitionere. Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govemment Advocate and Mr. Anrind Dubey, Panel Lawyw for the State/respondents. ¥- *-> ORDER /' (Passed on 2^h Day of January, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that the facts and quesUon of law involved in the present writ peUtions are squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Yastwant Kumar Bharadway vs. Municlpal CorporaVon, Durg and anottier1. •N"n""^,,^3^^~^.-^u'-A. ^_ ^ ^^^.^. '^^ '.^•j-^,.^^ .j'-.j"-""y"""'"'^ '^'^ '""'^.—2=m=^affiimF»'<'——~~saasa"d@tmSS 2. For the aforemenUoned reasons, the writ peBtions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter <rf yasftwart Kumar Bharadwsy (Supra), subject to vertfication of the fact as to whether the petittoners have acquired B.Ed./B.T.I. Certfficates at their own expenses as per the circulare dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. Noorderastocosts. 3. A copy of this order b®placed on Uie record of the connected wrtt petition. iatisb K- Judge 1 2008 (IQ MPJR-CG 96 ¥=