Criminal Appeal (U/S) No. 26 OF 1995 In the matter of an appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. ************ Nandu Mallah, S/o Lakhan Mallah, R/o Village Mal Bigha (Madhopur) P.S.-Chandi, District- Nalanda. ……(Appellant) Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Krishna Sao, S/o Sri Rovind Sao. 3. Naveena Sao, S/o Lakhan Sao. Both R/o Village-Madhopur Bazar, P.S.-Chandi, District- Nalanda. 4. Ram Golam Chaukidar, S/o Sri Prabhu Chaukidar, R/o Village-Madhopur Dih, P.S.-Chandi, District- Nalanda. 5. Nawal Kishore Dafadar, S/o Sri Ram Chandra Singh, R/o Village-Parari, P.S.-Chandi, Dist.-Nalanda. 6. Rameshwari Devi, W/o Ram Golam Chaukidar. 7. Kameshwar Paswan eldest son of Ram Golam Chaukidar. Both R/o Village-Madhopur Dih, P.S.-Chandi, District- Nalanda. 8. Pragash Pandey, S/o Govind Pandey, R/o Village-Madhopur Dih, P.S.-Chandi, District- Nalanda. ……….Respondents. ************* For the Appellant : Mr. Girish Chandra Narain, Adv. For the State: Mr. R.B. Roy “Raman”, APP. ************** P R E S E N T THE HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH Anjana Prakash, J. 1. The appellant is aggrieved with the judgment dated 07.07.1994 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hilsa in Complaint Case No. 28(C)/1988/Tr. No. 93 of 1994 by which it has acquitted the Respondents No. 2 to 8 for the charges framed under Sections 147, 148, 379, 323 and 342 IPC. 2. On going through the judgment of acquittal I find that the Trial Court has not committed any illegality in acquitting the Respondent Nos. 2 to 8. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. (Anjana Prakash, J.) Patna High Court, Patna, Dated, the 2nd May, 2011. NAFR/Vikash/-