IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.972 of 2008 Between: E.Muni Venkata Ramana and another … Petitioners And A.Appala Narasamma and another … Respondents This Court made the following: HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.972 of 2008 ORDER: - This Court never comes across quashing a Sessions Case on committal and when the charges were framed. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that, the 2nd respondent filed the present complaint, as a counter blast to the case in P.R.C.No.25 of 2007, where the complainant is accused No.1. This Court by order dated 07.03.2008 dismissed the Crl.P.No.7825 of 2007 filed by the petitioners, in which the de facto complainant is accused No.1, seeking quashing of the proceedings in P.R.C.No.25 of 2007 on the file of I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam, holding that by initiation of quash proceedings by the petitioner, it desires this Court to conduct an enquiry into the truth or otherwise of the rival contentions of the parties about the incidents leading to the registration of two crimes and also requires this Court to analyse the abuses said to have been made by the accused with reference to the ingredients of the offence under Section 3(x) of the Schedule Castes and Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. It is well settled that in exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C., this Court will not be justified in conducting an enquiry as to the reliability or genuineness or otherwise of the allegations made in the F.I.R. and the charge sheet and this extreme relief is available in only rarest of rare cases. In view of the fact that the complaint allegations in the charge sheet clearly discloses that the petitioners, who are accused 1 and 2, committed offences punishable under Sections 354 and 506 IPC by pushing L.W.1 a woman and touched her shoulder and pushed her down in broad day light with an intention to outrage her modesty in the presence of several people and on committal the same is numbered as Sessions Case No.5 of 2008 and necessary charges have been framed, it is not desirable to quash the proceedings at the initial stages. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. _______________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J 2nd July 2010 lmv