C. Review No. 1 of 2008 10.01.2008 Present: Mr. J.L. Bhardwaj, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. R.M. Bisht, Deputy Advocate for respondent No.1. The only grounds taken in this review petition are that (1) the petitioner shall become overage by the next academic year and (2) in the case relied upon by us in our judgment i.e. CWP No. 1397 of 2007, titled Dreamz College of Pharmacy and another Vs. State of H.P. & others, decided on 14.9.2007, the students were granted admission. Both these submissions are without any force. We had clearly held in our judgment that the academic atmosphere cannot be vitiated by giving admissions at a very belated stage. This order was passed by us on 27.12.2007 and, therefore, we felt that no admission should be granted at such a belated stage. In Dreamz case (supra) the order was passed on 14th September, 2007, which was much earlier. As far as the contention with regard to petitioner’s becoming overage is concerned the same has no merit. Once we have held that the petitioner is not …2… entitled for admission this year, the fact that he may become overage next year does not in any manner affect the merits of the case. The review petition is rejected. ( Deepak Gupta ), J. January 10, 2008 ( V.K. Ahuja), J. (BSS)