CRM No.M-9942 of 2011.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CRM No.M-9942 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.05.2011 **** Anju Aggarwal & Anr. . . . . Petitioners VS. State of Haryana . . . . Respondent **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Sarfaraj Hussain, Advocate for petitioner Mr. HS Deol, Addl. AG Haryana **** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The prayer in this petition is for enlargement of the petitioners in case FIR No.127 dated 21.02.2011 under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act registered at PS City Gurgaon. (2). As per the allegations contained in the FIR, the petitioners are alleged to have accompanied the members of a gang who used to inspire confidence amongst the prospective buyers to sell the property by impersonation which was admittedly not owned by them. (3). The petitioner was arrested on 21.02.2011 and is in judicial custody since then. CRM No.M-9942 of 2011.doc - 2 – (4). The petitioners are young women who have minor child to look after. There is no criminal antecedent of the petitioners. (5). Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Harmesh Chand, states that the investigation is complete though challan is yet to be presented which shall be presented within a week. (6). Owing to all the attending circumstances and the fact that the conclusion of the Magisterial trial will take more time, however, without expressing any views on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. (7). Disposed of accordingly. Dasti. 10.05.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge