W; m m zoo \ E%d mm wt zoo ‘mm (W) k . Wm W200 WW (WEI) WWW F ammm WWW 3 WW€ifEW7fm§w %3?Ema?ré$r mandatory procedures under the Act have been duly compned with, has been cross—examined at length, however, the defence has not been’abie to impeach the credibmty of his version. His from the evidence of Nathmai Soni In the instant case th ugh the witnesses of recovery, seizure and other documents hav turned hostile, however, they have admitted their signatures o er the prosecution documents. Shri M.G. Chowke (P -5) Investigating Officer, has deposed that after receiving secret i formation he recorded the same in the Sanha, after forwarding th version is also corroborat (PW-7), who is an indepe dent witness and has stated that he recognized the accused Pa ha, recovery of cannabis was made in his presence, he had don the weighment and on weighing, the contraband was found to b 7.1 kg. He has denied the suggestion that he is deposing at thei stance of the poiice. I have heard iearned ounsel for the parties. information to the City Superintendent of Poiice and after record ng the reasons for not obtaining the search warrant he proce ded to the piace of occurrence. He apprised the appellant a ut his legal rights that he could be searched in presence of Magistrate or Gazetted Officer and after obtaining his conse the search was effected and ?kg of narcotic drug was recov red and seized from the appellant. §ample of the contraband was sent for chemical examination and chemiCar analysis report? confirms that the contrabawas X/ ,i e n , r” 3AA ”x Wm m zoo ‘mm (13W)