EIGH CGHRT OF CHHA'E‘TISGARH AT BHASPHR ‘vVrit Feiitian ( “1 No. $3 0f29§8 (WRTT PETTHON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Honvble Mr. Satish K. Awnilmtri, J.) Present : Qhn Ajay Shivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents QRAL GR.E. (Passed (m 8m 0f February, 20$3) 1. The petititmer was initially appointed as Teacher on 10.09.1998 on a fixed pay of Rs. 1400/-. A_&er completion of probation period the petitiorier was granted regular pay scale on 10.09.2000. 2. The question of law involved herein is asto whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. 3. Learned oounsel appearing for the petitioner as weil as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same as to that of in WP. No. l463l2006 (Aeman Jain Vs. State Government. of Chjiattisgarh & another), whieh was allowed wide order dated 10. l1,.7.,006. 4. In View ofthe above-stated submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms i.e.Apetiti011er is entitled, for regular pay scale with effect from the date of initial appointment, subjeot to verifieation ofthe facts. No order asto costs. v r #e Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Salm l’E’l‘lTlGNER : MGhan La! Sahu Sfo Shri Daya Ram Sahu, age about 52 yams, U,D.T., Govt. High Schooi, Nari, Block Kurud, Digit. Dhamtari (CG). VERSUS RESPGNDENTS : 1. State of ClLhattisgarh, Through the Secretarv Education 8c Trihal Department, DKS Bhava'n: Raipur (CG). 2. District Education Officen Distt. Dhamtari (CG). 3. Block Edueatioo Ofiieer, Block Kurud (CG).