THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH C.R.P.Nos.4603 of 2009 and C.R.P.No.3342 of 2011 COMMON ORDER: The petitioner-Revenue Divisional Officer/Land Acquisition Officer, Guntur, is common and the respondents are different in both the civil revision petitions. But, however, as similar questions of law and facts are involved in both the Civil Revision Petitions, these petitions are taken up together for disposal by way of common order. The extent of the land is different and the quantum of compensation is different. For the purpose of convenience, the facts in C.R.P.No.4603 of 2009 are referred hereunder. The land of the respondent to an extent of Ac.1-59 cents was acquired under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act and award No.4/86-87, dated 09-09-1986, was passed by the Land Acquisition Officer awarding compensation @ Rs.40,000/- per acre and other statutory benefits. Aggrieved thereby, the respondent filed an application requesting to refer the matter to the Civil Court. On reference, the Reference Court, vide order, dated 28-06-2002, enhanced compensation from Rs.40,000/- to Rs.50,000/- per acre and awarded other statutory benefits. Aggrieved by the order of the Civil Court, the respondent-claimant filed A.S.No.2616 of 2003 before this Court and this Court by judgment and decree, dated 05-04-2005, allowed the appeal in part holding that the claimant is entitled for payment of compensation @ Rs.14/- per sq. yard for the lands acquired apart from all statutory benefits that have been granted by the Reference Court and also awarded interest on 30% solatium. As the compensation awarded by this Court was not paid, the respondent herein filed E.P.No.23 of 2006 and the Executing Court i.e., Principal Senior Civil Judge, Guntur, while taking into consideration about enhancement of compensation by this Court in A.S.No.2616 of 2003, dated 05-04-2005, allowed the said application directing the Land Acquisition Officer to deposit an amount of Rs.11,02,293/- before the court below. Thereafter, the petitioner herein filed E.A.No.103 of 2008 requesting the court to record full satisfaction of the decree. The court below vide its order, dated 30-05-2009, dismissed the said application. Aggrieved thereby, the present application is filed. As per Section 23 (1-A) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short “the Act”), the claimant is entitled for 12% additional market value and as per Section 23 (2) of the Act, the claimant is entitled for 30% solatium. I have perused both the calculation memos filed by the respondents/claimants as well as the Land Acquisition Officer. The respondents/claimants have calculated the compensation amount as per the orders of this Court. The Land Acquisition Officer, calculated the compensation without taking into consideration the enhancement made by this Court. Absolutely, there is no justification on the part of the Land Acquisition Officer in filing such calculation memo without calculating the amount of enhanced compensation. Therefore, I am of the opinion that the court below had rightly dismissed the said applications. Hence, I do not see any infirmity, legal or otherwise in the impugned orders so as to call for interference by this Court. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed with costs. __________ 29-07-2011 Prv