IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.977 OF 2004 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.1 OF 1998 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.1708 OF 1992 AND SUMMARY SUIT NO.1709 OF 1992 AND SUMMARY SUIT NO.3754 OF 1992 Ashok Thapar, etc.etc. ...Plaintiffs Versus M/s.Saral Enterprises & Ors. ...Defendants And The Court Receiver, High Court, Mumbai. ...Respondent ...... Mr.Kishore Jain i/b Mr.Priyadarshan Shah for Applicants/Plaintiffs. Mr.Ankit Bhatt i/b Mr.D.D’Mello for Defendants. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. JULY 18, 2005. JULY 18, 2005. JULY 18, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. : 2 : 1. Counsel for the Applicants fairly states that nothing survives for consideration in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (d) and (g) and (h). 2. In other words, only prayer clause (f) will remain for consideration. Even with regard to this prayer clause, Counsel for the Applicants fairly states that the Applicants have been recently informed that the Judgment Debtor has been declared insolvent. If it is so, the Applicants will have to implead Official Assignee as party to the proceedings to seek such relief. 3. In the circumstances, Counsel for the Applicants prays that the Applicants be permitted to withdraw this Chamber Summons with liberty to file fresh Application for the relief in terms of prayer clause (f) or such other relief as may be advised. 4. Hence, dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.