1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP Nos. 558 with CWP Nos. 559, 560,561,562,572,573,574,575,576,577 and 613 of 2010. Decided On : 13.7. 2010. 1. CWP No. 558 of 2010 Krishnu Ram …..Petitioner Vs State of Himachal Pradesh & others …..Respondents 2. CWP No. 559 of 2010 Guljari Lal …..Petitioner Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & others …..Respondents. 3. CWP No. 560 of 2010 Shiv Kumar Sharma ..…Petitioner Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & others ...Respondents 4. CWP No. 561 of 2010 Nirupma Sharma …....Petitioner Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & others ……...Respondents. 5. CWP No. 562 of 2010 Arvind Bhargava ..Petitioner Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & others ..Respondents. 6. CWP No. 572 of 2010 Ashwani Kumar ..Petitioner Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & others . .Respondents. 7. CWP No.573 of 2010 Vinay Kumar Bhargava …Petitioner Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & others Respondents. 8. CWP No.574 of 2010 Narinder Kumar Sharma …Petitioner Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & others …Respondents 9. CWP No.575 of 2010 Mahender Singh …Petitioner Vs State of Himachal Pradesh & others Respondents. 2 10. CWP No.576 of 2010 Shrinivas …Petitioner Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & others ….Respondents 11. CWP No.577 of 2010 Subhash Bhargava ….Petitioner Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & others …..Respondents 12. CWP No.613 of 2010 Bhuvneshwari …Petitioner Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & others ….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the Petitioner(s) : Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondent(s) Mr.R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners in these cases are aggrieved since according to them the training period they had spent for JBT is not counted for the service benefits. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that all the petitioners will represent their grievances before the Government and at this stage, this Court need not go into the merits of the cases. Therefore, without expressing any opinion as to the merits of the cases, these writ petitions are disposed of as follows: 3. There will be a direction to the first respondent to look into the grievances of the petitioners and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law treating the writ petitions as representations. The needful shall be done within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along 3 with a copy of the writ petition in each case. In case the petitioners seek for an opportunity of hearing, the same shall also be granted. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. July 13, 2010. ( Justice Kuldip Singh ), Judge (sks/grs).