IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9824 of 2005 Madan Tiwari …Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Secretary Forest & Environment Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. Bihar State Forest Development Corporation Ltd. 13 Patliputra Colony Patna through its Managing Director cum Chief Conservator of Forest, Bihar Patna. …Respondents For the Petitioner :Mr. Ram Krishna Singh & :Mr. Raghunath Singh For the B.S.F.D.C. :Mr. R. K. Shukla For the State :Dr. Chandra Shekhar Azad, A.C. to G.A.9 ----------- 05. 24.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shukla, learned counsel for the Respondent-Bihar State Forest Development Corporation (for short ‘the Corporation’). Learned counsel for the respondents looking at the order dated 29.07.2011 passed on the present writ proceeding has taken a fair stand that the matter be disposed of by directing the appropriate authority of the Corporation to consider the writ petition itself as a representation of the petitioner and dispose of the same by a reasoned order. He, however, points out that since the petitioner has already superannuated, relief, if any, to be ultimately granted may be notional. In view of the aforesaid, the application is disposed of in the following terms:- Let the Managing Director-cum-Chief Conservator of Forest, Bihar, Patna(respondent no..2) consider the grievance of the petitioner set out in writ petition itself and dispose of the same by a reasoned order as quickly as possible preferably within three months from today. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )