1 CA-5814.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5814 OF 2010 The Archdiocese of Bombay & Ors. .... Applicants Vs. Mr. Arcanjo Mario Sodder & Anr. .... Respondents Shri Prakash Naik for the Applicants. Ms P.H. Kantharia, APP, for the State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: JANUARY 18, 2011 P.C: The learned counsel for the applicants has not been able to show any good reason why he cannot challenge the order issuing process against the applicants by filing appropriate proceedings before the Court of Sessions. The learned counsel states that two judgments of the Supreme Court say that High Court, too, can entertain such an application and there is no obligation for the party to approach the Court of Sessions first. Though the High Court can always entertain applications/petitions in exercise of its revisional, inherent as well as supervisory jurisdiction, unless the litigant 2 CA-5814.10 shows that the ordinary remedies which are available under the Cr.P.C. are inconvenient or would not produce the desired result, there would be no occasion for forcing the High Court to take upon itself the business which can be dealt with by the Court of Sessions. It has to be mentioned that this principal seat of the High Court has under its jurisdiction about 20 Courts of Sessions, spread over half of Maharashtra and if everybody in the State decides to rush to the High Court simply because the High Court can entertain such applications/petitions, the High Court would have no other business. Therefore, while granting liberty to the applicants to approach the Court of Sessions and protecting the applicants from the proceedings which have been initiated before a Magistrate, that is by staying the proceedings for a period of seven days, the application is allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed as such. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)