IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 284 of 2011 Decided on: 26.8.2011 Amar Dogra …Petitioner Versus Shri P.C. Dhiman …Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner : Mr. G. R. Palsra, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : In sequel to notice issued by this Court, Mr. P.C. Dhiman, Principal Secretary (Health) is present before the Court. The Court has very interactive session with him. He submits that there are some administrative difficulties in not implementing the judgment dated 21.6.2010, rendered in CWP(T) No. 760 of 2008. 2. The Court is of the considered view that the ends of justice will be met if the case of the petitioner is considered by the respondent for promotion w.e.f. February, 2008 on ad hoc basis in order to enable her to get promotion to the higher post and also consequential increase in her salary by way of one increment. Mr. R.P. Singh, learned Assistant Advocate General prays for and is granted four weeks' time to do the needful. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No -2- 3. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-State to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the higher post w.e.f. February, 2008 on ad hoc basis, within a period of four weeks from today. 4. It is made abundantly clear by way of precaution that the order passed in the present contempt petition read with judgment dated 21.6.2010, rendered in CWP(T) No. 760 of 2008, as modified herein above, shall not be treated as precedent for future. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge August 26, 2011 (K. Attri)