IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10796 of 2010 MADAN SADA @ MADAN KUMAR . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02. 26-04-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. On behalf of the petitioner it has been submitted that the present case under Section 366(A)/34 of the IPC has been filed on wrong allegations and in fact the petitioner and the alleged victim, Nitu Kumari, daughter of the informant were having love affair and they have married voluntarily and are living together. It would not be proper to accept such submissions only on the basis of alleged affidavit by the victim girl. Hence, this application for anticipatory bail is dismissed. However, it is made clear that in case the victim girl is produced before the concerned Magistrate and in her statement recorded after proper identification, she supports the aforesaid case of the petitioner, in that event on surrender, the above named petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.7000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in Morkahi P.S. Case No.26 of 2008, G.R. No. 551 of 2008. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh,J.)