IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 10TH OCTOBER 2011 / 18TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 26552 of 2011(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------- 1. NIMMI N., D/O NARAYANANKUTTY, AGED 21 YEARS, SREEKRISHNA HOUSE, NEAR MAZHAYANNUR SIVA TEMPLE, VARIYAM LANE, NETTISSERY P.O., THRISSUR - 680 657. 2. KIRAN K., S/O.VENUGOPAL V., AGED 23 YEARS, SOWPARNIKA, P.O.PERINGAVU, THRISSUR - 680 018. BY ADV. SMT. SHAMSEERA. C.ASHRAF RESPONDENT(S): -------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673635. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673635. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: BKA WP(C).No. 26552 of 2011(T) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 20.09.2011. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 22.09.2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE BKA ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).26552/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 10th day of October, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners applied for revaluation of the failed answer scripts in the 6th semester B.Tech Supplementary Examination vide Exts.P1 & P2 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4.Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs