IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12577 of 2006 RAJU RAM Versus THE C.E.O.,PATNA MUNICIPAL COR ----------- WITH CWJC No.12589 of 2006 KAMLA Versus THE C.E.O.,PATNA MUNICIPAL COR ----------- WITH CWJC No.12598 of 2006 PARWATI DEVI Versus THE C.E.O.,PATNA MUNICIPAL COR ----------- WITH CWJC No.12679 of 2006 WAKIL RAM Versus THE PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPN.&ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.12699 of 2006 SMT.UMA DEVI Versus THE PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPN.&ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.12741 of 2006 SMT.SUDAMIYA Versus THE PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPN.&ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.12855 of 2006 HASIBA KHATOON Versus THE C.E.O.,PATNA MUNICIPAL COR ----------- WITH CWJC No.13033 of 2006 AKBAR ALI Versus PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPN.& ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.13118 of 2006 BIRJU RAM Versus 2 THE C.E.O.CUM COMMISSIONER,PMC ----------- WITH CWJC No.13178 of 2006 KESHO SINGH Versus PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPN.& ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.13838 of 2006 MOSTT.DEVMUNNI DEVI Versus THE C.E.O.CUM COMMISSIONER,PMC ----------- WITH CWJC No.14325 of 2006 SAGARWA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.14759 of 2006 SHANTIYA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.15508 of 2006 DILIP KUMAR Versus THE PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPN.&ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.15545 of 2006 MOST.SHILA DEVI Versus THE PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPN.&ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.15578 of 2006 SMT.HIRIYA Versus THE PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPN.&ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.15594 of 2006 SMT.DHANMA Versus THE PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPN.&ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.15596 of 2006 3 MOST.PHULA DEVI Versus THE PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPN.&ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.15604 of 2006 DHARMENDRA Versus THE PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPN.&ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.15688 of 2006 RAM SIDH SHARMA Versus THE PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPN.&ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.15696 of 2006 MOST.KAUSHALIYA DEVI Versus THE PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPN.&ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.15700 of 2006 MARCHHIYA DEVI Versus THE PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPN.&ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.15917 of 2006 MOST.LALPARI DEVI Versus THE PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPN.&ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.16144 of 2006 NURAISHA KHATUN Versus THE PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPN.&ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.16337 of 2006 DEO MUNI DEVI Versus THE PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPN.&ORS ----------- 2. 13.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh learned counsel appearing 4 on behalf of the respondents – Corporation. All the writ applications are relates to the payment of retiral dues, as such they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The grievances of the petitioner in these writ applications are with regard to payment of retiral dues which according to them have not been settled as yet. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents – Corporation submits that in case petitioners file separate representation stating details of their claims, the same would be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for expeditious disposal of their claims, petitioners propose to file separate representation/fresh representation before the Municipal Commissioner-cum- Chief Executive Officer stating all their claims separately enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of their claim alongwith certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks from today. In case such representations are filed, the Municipal Commissioner-cum-Chief Executive Officer shall consider each of the claims raised by the 5 petitioners in their representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the admitted claims of the petitioner could be paid without delay. However, if any of the claims are found not admissible as per law, the same should be communicated to the petitioners along with reasons therewith. All the above writ applications are disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)