IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2011 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 34257 of 2011(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- MURALIDAS.A., S/O.BALASUBRAMANNIAN, AGED 23 YEARS, RESIDING AT AMBAKKATTU HOUSE, MADAKKATHARA P.O., MANNUTHY VIA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.SANDHYA RAMAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673 635. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-673 635. BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 34257 of 2011(F) APPENDIX: PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1: A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 14/11/2011 IN RESPECT OF HIS 4TH SEMESTER EXAMINATION. EXHIBIT P2: A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 1/12/2011 IN RESPECT OF HIS 5TH SEMESTER EXAMINATION. EXHIBIT P3: A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 25/9/2011 IN RESPECT OF HIS 6TH SEMESTER EXAMINATION. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE. KP ANTONY DOMINIC, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 34257 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioner, submits that he appeared for B.Tech 4, 5 and 6th semester examinations and failed in some papers. He submitted Exts. P1 to P3 applications for revaluation and filed this writ petition seeking an order for expeditious revaluation and declaration of his results. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Kp/-