IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.49363 of 2008 SHIVPUJAN MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 13.04.2009 Heard. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted under sections 304(B)/34 and 201 IPC. Admittedly, the death of the victim has occurred in suspicious circumstances in matrimonial home within one year of marriage. It is contended that the petitioner was not present at the house. In this connection, learned counsel for the petitioner draws attention of the Court to Annexure-2 which is a certificate granted by the Station Superintendent, East Central Railway, Motihari. It is also submitted that the informant in his further statement has not alleged anything about the present petitioner. Referring to Annexure-3, it has been submitted that a compromise has been entered into between the parties. This document dated 10.10.2008 has been filed in the court below by the informant. Having considered the submissions and after going through the records, this Court is not convinced that a case for grant of anticipatory bail has been made out. The application seeking anticipatory bail stands rejected. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )