IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No. 16134 of 2007 Between: K.Rajesh Babu S/o.K.Venkateswarlu, R/o.Vidyutnagar quarters, D.No.4-1326, Greamspet, Chittoor Town and District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd., Vidyutsoudha, Hyderabad - 500 082, Represented by the Chairman and Managing Director. 2 Joint Managing Director (HRD, COMML, IPC, Reforms, RA & IT, Transmission Corporation of A.P. Ltd., Vidyutsoudha, Hyderabad - 500 082. 3 Superintending Engineer, Transmission Corporation of A.P. Ltd., Cuddapah Circle, Cuddapah. 4 Divisional Engineer, A.P. Transco Ltd., TL & SS, Tirupathi. 5 The Assistant Divisional Engineer, (Maintenance) TL & SS Transco Ltd., 225 KV Sub-station, Chittoor. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to continue the petitioner in service as A.E. on contract basis and to consider about his regularization on merits de hors the fact that Crime No.89/2007 was registered against him by Chittoor II town Police Station declaring that the petitioner did not violate any of the service agreement conditions as alleged in the order dated 19-7-2007 issued by the 2nd respondent in his memo CGN (HRD & TRG)/DE/DC 170-0-2007-1, that the termination of the service of the petitioner is highly unjust improper and contrary to law, and violative of the fundamental rights and the principles of natural justice and to pass such other or further orders which the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to deem fit, just and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.D.RAMALINGA SWAMY Counsel for the Respondents: Mr. P.R.BALARAMI REDDY (SC FOR AP TRANSCO) The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.16134 OF 2007 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner addressed a letter, dated 23.02.2008, to the Registry stating that the matter has been settled out of the Court and, as such, the writ petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. _________________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 25th February, 2008. IBL To 1. Two CCS to 2. Two CD Copies