IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 4 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 749 OF 2009 MR. SAVIO PINTO AND ANR., ... Petitioners Versus MR. SUDIN NATU, EX-CHIEF OFFICER,CURCHOREM CACORA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. A. F. Diniz, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. D. Pangam, Advocate for respondent no.2. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 6th May, 2011 P.C. Heard Mr. A. F. Diniz, learned Advocate for the petitioners and Mr. D. Pangam, learned Advocate for respondent no.2. 2. The grievance made by the petitioners in this petition is that respondents have not complied with the directions given by this Court by Order dated 25.1.2010. 3. Reply filed on behalf of respondent no. 2 discloses that the persons to whom the directions were issued to demolish the constructions have obtained stay from appellate authority, Hence the cause of action for filing the present petition does not survive. 4. Hence notices issued to respondents stand discharge. 5. The petition stands disposed of. A. P. LAVANDE, J. vn