1 BA 955-2011 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.955 OF 2011 Vitthal Ganapati Patil .Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr.P.G.Sarda, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs.S.D.Shinde, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 16TH AUGUST, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. This is an application for bail by an accused, who is in jail for more than two years for the offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant is alleged to have had forcible sexual intercourse with the victim and dragged the victim from the place of rape to a place in his field and then left. Victim's ear rings 2 BA 955-2011 were allegedly snatched by the applicant. The ear rings were, however, in the field as per the spot panchanama. It is possible that when the victim was dragged, ear rings might have fallen in the field. 3. Considering the nature of allegations made, applicant is not entitled to bail. The learned Additional Sessions Judge has already observed that the trial would be expedited. The learned Judge should, therefore, proceed with the trial, since the applicant is in jail for more than two years and finish it as early as possible. 4. Bail Application stands rejected. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)