IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5277 of 2011 MD. ALIM S/o of Late Ibrahim Nadaf , resident of village- Mahpatia, P.S- Bheja, District- Madhubani. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.03.2011 The petitioner is in custody since 10.10.2010 in relation to Katihar Railway P.S.Case No. 42 of 2010 instituted under Section 328 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The bail petition has been rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge III, Katihar in bail petition no. 43/2011 by order dated 27.01.2011, I have perused the order. It is an apology of an order which shows absolutely non application of mind by the Judicial Officer, concerned. It must be remembered that while passing orders rejecting bail, the judicial officer is required to note down the reasons for which he is disinclined to grant bail merely stating that there is enough material against the petitioner does not take us anywhere. It is only shirking judicial responsibility and shows the irresponsibility of the officer concerned. What is the material and how is the petitioner is connected with the crime is not even indicated much less discussed, and therefore, this Court has no option but to remand the matter for fresh consideration to the learned Judge which should be disposed of in accordance with law. Upon petitioner moving the learned Additional District Judge and Sessions judge Katihar once again appropriate order passed in accordance with law within two weeks and this time after due deliberation and not shirking his responsibility and showing it on the High Court. 2 This application is disposed of. Let the order be communicated to the concerned Judge by fax at the cost of the petitioner and let the copy of the order also be sent to the Judicial Officer to be used that his duty in passing such orders. Namita ( Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)