IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. L.P.A. No.208 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 17.2.2010 The Indian Overseas Bank. -----Appellant Vs. The Presiding Officer & another. -----Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present:- Mr. Ramesh Chopra, Advocate for the appellant. ----- ORDER: 1. This appeal has been preferred against order of learned Single Judge, dismissing the writ petition against interim order of the Labour Court, allowing additional evidence to be led on the quantum of punishment and on decision making by the Inquiry Officer. The order has been upheld by learned Single Judge. 2. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant relies upon proviso to Section 11-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short, “the Act”) to submit that for exercising power under Section 11-A, no fresh evidence could be considered. We are of the view that LPA No.208 of 2010 interference with proceedings before the Labour Court is not called for at the interim stage. Whatever arguments the appellant may have, can be considered if the appellant is aggrieved by the final order of the Labour Court. 4. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. ( ADARSH KUMAR GOEL ) JUDGE February 17, 2010 ( ALOK SINGH ) ashwani JUDGE 2