1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 2352 OF 2009 Harshad Smruti CHS Ltd & Anr. ...Plaintiffs. Vs. Kulsum I. Dayatar & Ors. ...Defendants. Mr. Santosh Narwade i/by M/s. M.P. Vashi & Associates for the Plaintiffs. Mr. D.R. Dahiwar for Defendant Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 17TH FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C.- 1 The parties have arrived at settlement and accordingly signed the consent terms dated 17/02/2010. It is counter signed by the respective advocates. The same is taken on record and marked “X”. There is no objection of signatures, authorization and identity of the parties. The statement is made that the consent terms are well within the framework of law and the record and no persons/parties will be affected by this consent terms. The parties are present in the Court. The undertaking given by the Defendants as agreed and accepted by the parties, are also accepted. 2 In view of this consent terms the suit is disposed of. 3 The refund of court fee, if any, in accordance with law. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)