le' DIVISIOIS! BE HON'BLESHRI SUNIL KUMAR SiNHA, J. Niti Das D/o Late Shri Anil Kumar Das, aged about 55 years, working as Upper Division Teacher, Kamladevi Sangeet Mahavidhyalaya Rangmandir, Gandhi Chowk, Raipur, residenf ofTikarapara, Chhoti Golony, Raipur (C.G.) ; Versus 1. Tfte ; Stete through ifs Education of Chhattisgarh, LJ:^"!•./-" retary, Higner artment, DKS r (C.G.) 2. Kamladevi Mahavidyalays, Sangeet ! ritvyyn IIS> .en >+ 3. President Shri Shekhar Ashaskiya Shlkshan San iang Mandir, Gandhi Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Indira Kata Sanaeet Universitv Khairagarh, Chhattisgarh. 2(iroffhs (ApReal to the Division EenchlAct. 2006 r.f'Li-fii^'S' Smt. Mala Dubey, iearned counsel for the Shri J.K. Gilda, learned for the State/ respondent No.1. appellant. te th The followina iudament of the Court was passed bv Learned counsel forthe parties are heard. t'? 2. Appellant Niti Das has filed this writ appeal against the impugned order dated 30-04-2009, passed in W.P.(S) No. 2049/2009. 3. During the course of hearing of the writ petition, it transpired, as is recorded in the impugned order, thatthe statutory appeal filed by the petitioner/ appellant against the order of her termination from ser/ices dsted 19-02-2008 was heard and was reserved for orders. Para 3 of the impug.ned .order further records the submission of learned State Counset that appropriate order shati bepassedbyrespondentNo.1 expeditiously. 4. On due consideration of the submissions of leamed counsei for the parties; respondent No.1 is directed to pass order in the appellant's statutory appeat, if not already passed, within a period of one month from today. 5. Shri J.K. Gilda, tearned Additionai Advocate Generai is directed to convey this order to respondent No.1 immediately. With the above direction, the appeal stands disposed of. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- Suiul Kumar Sinha Judge nimmi