C.W.P. No.16335 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.16335 of 2011 Date of Decision.02.09.2011 Jiwan son of Teka and others .....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana through its Financial Commissioner & Principal Secretary, Government of Haryana, Department of Urban Development and Panchayats, Haryana, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Gaurav Singh Hooda, Advocate for the petitioners. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner challenges the communication from the District Revenue Officer, Sonipat to District Development and Panchayat Officer, finding some persons as ineligible for allotment as the petitioner claims to be a person, who had been originally included in the list but later removed without any notice. I do not find that there has been any allotment made so far. If only the property had been ordered to be allotted to him and later a decision is taken not to allot, the petitioner can claim that his right is infringed. In the absence of any order of allotment, the petitioner's right had not been fructified and therefore, the petitioner's action is premature. 2. If ever any action is taken for making an allotment and if the petitioner can establish that allotment to yet another person was wrongly made and that he has better claims over any other person, who C.W.P. No.16335 of 2011 -2- had been actually allotted, then the petitioner will be at liberty to approach this Court. Right now, the petitioner has no legal right to claim any allotment or complain of a communication not to himself that has removed his name from the panel of eligible candidates. 3. The writ petition is disposed of with the above observations. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE September 02, 2011 Pankaj*