Eagmanch IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION s No. . $g% of 2009 PETITIONER T.R. Mehra, son of Shri Pr'em Sui, aged 50 years, Occupafion—Service, presenfly pos‘red as Training Officer-3, Social STudies, Industrial Training Ins’rifufe, Korba (CG). <.w’ VS 1. / Secre‘rary, Technical Educafion, Manpower Planning, Science & Technology Deparfmen’r, D.K.5. Bhawan, ‘Man’rralaya, Raipur. VK 2. RESPONDENTS ’7‘. 3. w, 4. .m Pradeep Diwan, son of no’r kn‘own To ’rhe pefi’rioner, Occupa‘rion-Service, The Secre’rary, Depar’rmem‘ of Tribal Welfare Deparfmem‘, D.K.$. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). The Director, Technical Educa‘iion, Manpower Planning, Science 6 Technology Deparfmen’r, Raipur (CG) The Principal, IndusTriol Training Insfi‘rufe, Korba. 5. 1 Sfm‘e of Chhah‘isgar‘h, fhrough The i é Training Officer—3, Social S’rudies, presen‘rly pos’red af Indutrial Training Insfi‘ruTe, Mann, Disfric’r Raipur (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA s HIGH COURT OF CHHA’I‘TISGARH AT BILASPUR SB HON’BLE sHRI JUSTIbE PmTm ' r » x w.P.(sy‘No. éassmow T§R.Mehra Versus PETITIONER RESPONDENTS State bf C.G. 85 Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ART!CLE 226 OF THE ODNSTYI‘UTION OF INDIA - Appearance- Shrl Rajeev Shrlvastava counsel for the petltloner Shn Sumesh Bajag, G A w1th Smt Srmta Ghax P L for thc Stats ORAL ORDER (13.07.2009) Challenge in the present petition is to the-order dated 30.06.2009 (Armeuxre P/ 1) passed by respondent No.1 by which the petitioner has been transferred from Industrial Training , Institute Korba to Industrial Training Institute, Pankhanjore. Contention of counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is the employee of Tribal Welfare Department Whereas by the impugned order he has been, attached to the Technical Education, Man Power Planning, Science and Technology Department. I-Ie submits that this transfer order is impermissible under the law. On the other hand, counsel for the State submits that let the petitioner make a representation to the respondent No.1 and the same would be decided in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make a representation to the respondent No.1 within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of this order and in the eventuality of making any such representation the same would be dec1ded expeditiously Within a period cf three weeks from the date of its receipt Till then the impugned order /' Sd/- a. , Pritinker Diwaker l Judge l shall not be gven effect to. xER mwAxER l