IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2008 / 21ST POUSHA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 605 of 2007(S) --------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IA. NO./2372/2004 IN RP.709/2003 Dated 25/09/2004 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN IA. ------------------- POULOSE, S/O.PAILY, PLAKATTU, MANIYANTHATTU HOUSE, KUZHIKADU KARA, PUTHENCRUZ VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.K.NARAYANAN (PARUR) SRI.G.RAJAGOPAL RESPONDENTS: FIRST RESPONDENT IN IA. ----------------------- MUHAMMED HANEEF, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN OT THE PETITIONER) DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.R.BINDU THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.KRISHNAN, J ===================== CONTEMPT CASE(C)No.605 OF 2007 ===================== Dated this the 11th day of January 2008 JUDGMENT Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader, Annexure A5 is produced to show that only the question regarding title to the property is referred to the court. That was as per the order in R.P.No.709 of 2003. Subsequently the learned Judge by order dated 25.9.2004 had further given a direction to the District Collector to refer the question of entitlement to compensation for taking possession of the suit property and the question of title to the Sub Court within one month from the date of receipt of the copy of the order. Contempt proceedings were initiated earlier and on the basis of the submission made by the Government Pleader that the the matter has already been referred to the Prl.Sessions Court, N.Parur, the matter is closed. Therefore, I direct the first respondent District Collector,Ernakulam to refer the question of entitlement to compensation as well to the Sub Court along with the question of title which is already referred. The District Collector is directed to comply with the direction within six weeks from CC(C) 605/2007 -:2:- today. In case of failure, the petitioner herein is permitted to move this court for further orders. The contempt of court case is disposed of as above. M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE Cdp/-