IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH JANUARY 2011 / 29TH POUSHA 1932 OP (RC).No. 264 of 2011(O) ------------------------------------ RCP.143/2008 of PRL.MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM .................... PETITIONER :- -------------------- K.R.KABIR DAS, S/o.LATE SRI.RAMAN, 57/804, MAHAKAVI G. ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI – 682 011. BY ADV. SRI.H.HAMZA ROWTHER SRI.V.K.PEERMOHAMED KHAN RESPONDENT(S) :- ------------------------ V.T.AMBIKA, AGED 64 YEARS, W/o.N.G.KURUP, “SOUPERNIKA” PLOT No.29, JAWAHAR NAGAR, KADVANTHARA, KOCHI – 682 020. THIS OP (RENT CONTROL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: jvt PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JJ. ---------------------------------- O.P.(RC) No.264 of 2011 --------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of January 2011 J U D G M E N T Pius C. Kuriakose, J. Under challenge in this original petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is Ext.P6 order passed by the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam in a proceeding for execution of an eviction order passed by the Rent Control Court, Ernakulam. Even though several apparently attractive grounds have been raised, we notice that the petitioner has a statutory remedy under Section 14 of Act 2 of 1965 against Ext.P6 (even if he has a genuine grievance regarding the same) to the District Court, Ernakulam. We relegate the petitioner to that remedy and dispose of this OP(RC) without examining the merits of the grounds. 2. However, in view of the above, we direct the O.P.(RC) No.264 of 2011 -: 2 :- learned Munsiff (Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam) to keep the order of delivery in abeyance for five days, if delivery of the building is not already effected. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Jvt