^sae^'as F?C St^afeS^>S.S ^ C f- { 21^>^_ DT THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASFUR W.P. fS) No. 9-^/2003' PETITIONER .*/ Smt. Pumiina Sao, W/o. Shri Naresh Kuna.ai Sao, aged about 33 years, ^..•^p' Occupation Assistant Teacher- -°.••"i^-'/ Primary School, Sasatoli, Block TUda, -.'^'-••"l^ 'y.;)^y /xy e^ i/ ,'•(.•' RESPONDENTS "<^ /•'../' <-$/" .^ ^\>^ ^, ^' o- ^- ••^ District Raipiir, R/o. Jal Sansadhan Colony, TUda, Block TUda, Dista-ict Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS :1) State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretaiy, Department of School Education, DKS Bhavan Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) :2) District Education Officer, Raipur (C.G.) :3) The Block Education Officer TUda District Raipur (C.G.) ^•.r r".'-' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF USDIA _p^ nniTfiTTT * n' W. P.(S1 No. 9 Petitlone" Versus Stat®of Cnhattist !; 'rlon'ble Mr. Justice Satish g. Aflmhotri. J Mr. Mahrooz Atam, Adyocate for the petitioner. .^r. Satish Supta, &y. ©ovt. Advocat< idents/State. tt.t^- OR&ER (Passed on tiiis 20th &ay of February, 2007) 6, The petitioner was appointed vide order dated 31.12.93 (P/2) as Assistont Teacher on fixed poy scaie of Rs. 1200/-. Afte" completion of two years probation, she was gronted r-eguicr' pay scaie. 7. Leamed counsei appearing for -the petitioner ajbmits that the issue involved in the case is asto whether the petitioner is entitled to reguhr pay scale w.e.f. ihe date of initinl appointment or after compfetion of probation period. 7he isaie invoSved. herein was considered by the Madhya Prodesh State Administrative Tribunat, Jabatpur in O.A, No, 2745/89 wkant Yadu and 56 otiiers Vs. State of M.P. & otiiers), uAerein it was held tiiat the simitarly situated teachers are entitled to regubr pay scate w.e.f. the date of initial appointroent. The matter was taken-up to the Hon'bfe Supreme Court in ^ecia! Leave Petition (CiviS) No. 6892/93. Tne Miid petition wos dismisad by -Hie Hon'ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribuna! to the effect '^ay that -the Teachers/AssistcBit Taichers are entitled to regular pay scaSe from date of initict qipointraent. 4. Le&med counse! oppairing for the petitioner further ajbmits that this Court, whiie considering the same issue in Aemcn Jain Vs. T^e State Sovemment of Gihattisgarh &. eino-rtier (W.P. No. 1463 of .e.f. 200d} by order dated 10.11.2006, has granted reguhr pay scate w 1+ie dat®of initial appointmsnt. Learned counsel appearing for the parties jointiy submit -that this [s squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the eaie of Aeman Jain Vs. The State Sovemment of Chhaftisgar+i & onother (&ipru). Bablu ^- In view of that, +his petition is disposed of in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish KAgnihotri Judge