SM 1 1.ao.211.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 211 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 283 OF 2010 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 211 OF 2010 M/s. Riddhi Siddhi Developers ....Appellants. Versus Mrs. Nandini Anil Adhawade and others ....Respondents. ____________ Ms. Tanu Kothari i/b Sandesh D. Patil for the Appellants. Mr. Rajesh S. Datar for the Respondent. CORAM: R. M. BORDE, J. DATED : OCTOBER 13, 2011. P.C.: The appellants are raising exception to the interim order passed below Exhibit-5 in S. C. Suit No. 84 of 2009 on 14th September, 2009. The appellants/original defendants are restraining from carried out any construction upon the suit property or creating any third party interest of any nature during continuation of the suit. Since the order is operative for more than two years. The ends of justice would be met, if the directions are issued to the Trial Court to decide the pending suit expeditiously by continuing the interim order passed by the Trial Court which was operative until the disposal of the application. The Trial Court is directed to decide the S. C. Suit No. 84 of 2009 as expeditiously as possible, preferably by the end of April, 2012. The interim order passed by the Trial Court which was operative during pendency and disposal of application Exhibit-5 shall continue until the disposal of the suit. SM 2 1.ao.211.10 2. This order is passed without entering into the merits of controversy involved in the matter. The Trial Court is directed to decide the pending suit on its own merits and in accordance with the provisions of law. 3. With these directions, the Appeal from Order stands disposed of. In view of disposal of the Appeal from Order, pending Civil Application does not survive and stands disposed of accordingly. (R. M. BORDE, J.)