IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15873 of 2010 DEEPAK KUMAR S/O SRI RAMDESHWAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-GAWANDRI, P.O GAWANDRI, P.S.KUNDWA CHAINPUR, DISTRICT-EAST CHAMPARAN (BIHAR)…………………..PETITIONER Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POSTS, DEPARTMENT OF POST, DAK BHAWAN, NEW DELHI. 2. THE CHIEF POST MASTER GENERAL, BIHAR CIRCLE, PATNA (BIHAR). 3. THE DIRECTOR, POSTAL SERVICES (NORTH REGION), MUZAFFARPUR (BIHAR). 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POST OFFICES, WEST CHAMPARAN DIVISION, BETTIAH (BIHAR)……………………………RESPONDENTS ----------- 03/ 28-Sep-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Union of India representing the respondents. 2. The learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna has dismissed O.A. preferred by the petitioner against his inter-divisional transfer on consideration of relevant facts and on finding that Rule 37 which is mentioned in the order of transfer permits such transfer. We find no good reason to interfere with the order of the Tribunal. This writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. 3. A grievance has been raised on behalf of the petitioner that his representation dated 11.06.2010 contained in Annexure-3 against the order of relieving 2 dated 2.6.2010 has not been considered as yet. We make it clear that if the petitioner joins the transferred post and makes a representation against his transfer then such representation should be considered on its own merits without being prejudiced by the order of the learned Tribunal or of this Court. perwez ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)