IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1739 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5986 of 2010 With Interlocutory Application No. 7947 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.1739 of 2011 ====================================================== Babita Devi, W/o Shri Shyam Sahu, R/o Vill.- Bihnagar, P.O.-Biraul, P.S.- Pandaul, District- Madhubani. .... .... Appellant Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Commissioner, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga. 3. The District Magistrate, Madhubani. 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar, Madhubani. 5. The Child Development Project Officer, Pandaul, Madhubani. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant : Mr. Maya Shankar Mishra, Advocate with Mr. Nagendra Upadhyay, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 2. 23-11-2011 Interlocutory Application No. 7947 of 2011: The delay of 301 days occurred in filing the Letters Patent Appeal is condoned. Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. Patna High Court LPA No.1739 of 2011 (2) dt.23-11-2011 2 / 2 2 Letters Patent Appeal No.1739 of 2011: Feeling aggrieved by the order dated 8th December 2010 made by the learned single Judge in above C.W.J.C. No. 5986 of 2010, the writ petitioner has preferred this Appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent. The appellant claims appointment as Anganbari Sevika in Centre No.61, district-Madhubani as a matter of course on cancellation of the appointment of one Manju Devi. On cancellation of the appointment of one Manju Devi, the resultant vacancy shall be filled in afresh after demarcation of the beneficiary area. The claim for appointment made by the appellant has been rejected. Learned advocate Mr. Maya Shankar Mishra has appeared for the appellant. He has vehemently argued that on the merit list the appellant was at serial number 2, as a consequence of the cancellation of the appointment of the aforesaid Manju Devi, the appellant has a right to appointment as Anganbari Sevika in Centre No.61. We see no substance in the submission made by Mr. Mishra. Appeal is devoid of merit. Appeal is dismissed in limine. Pawan/- (R.M. Doshit, CJ) (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)