IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8710 of 2007 KUMARI CHANDA wife of Tribhuvan Baitha, resident of village Madhopur Digharua, P.S. Tajpur, District Samastipur … Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, through the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna, 2. District Magistrate, Patna, 3. Block Development Officer, Block Tajpur, District Samastipur, 4. Block Education Extension Officer, Block Tajpur, District Samastipur, 5. Ram Eqbal Rai, Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Madhopur, Digharua, Block Tajpur, District Samastipur, 6. Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Madhopur Digharua, Block Tajpur, District Samastipur, … Respondents with CWJC No.11762 of 2009 KUMARI CHANDA wife of Tribhuvan Baitha, resident of village Madhopur Digharua, P.S. Tajpur, District Samastipur … Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, through the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna, 2. District Magistrate, Patna, 3. The District Superintendent of Education, Samastipur, 4. Block Development Officer, Block Tajpur, District Samastipur, 5. Block Education Extension Officer, Block Tajpur, District Samastipur, 6. Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Madhopur Digharua, Block Tajpur, District Samastipur, 7. Chandeshwar Rai son of not known, the then Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Madhopur Digharua, Block Tajpur, District Samastipur, 8. Awaikant Bishwakarma son of not known, Present Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Madhopur Digharua, Block Tajpur, District Samastipur, … Respondents For the Petitioner: Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate 2 For the State: AC to SC 16 Mr. Umesh Kumar, AC to GP I ----------- 3 17.03.2011 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw these two writ applications to enable the petitioner to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority constituted under Rule 18 of the Bihar Panchayat Prarambhik Shikshak (Niyojan Avam Seva Shart) Niyamavali, 2006 (as amended by Amendment Rules 2008) (hereinafter to be referred to as “the Rules”). Learned counsel for the State raises no objection. As a result, these writ applications are dismissed as withdrawn. If such an appeal is preferred before the Appellate Authority, the same shall be considered and disposed of on its own merit in accordance with law within the time prescribed under the Rules. However, it is made clear that this Court has not formed any opinion on merit of the cases of he parties. SC (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)