vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5617 OF 1996 WRIT PETITION NO.5617 OF 1996 WRIT PETITION NO.5617 OF 1996 The Chief Engineer Irrigation Department, Pune & Ors. ... Petitioners V/s. Shri Savaleram S. Chavan & Anr. ... Respondents Mr.D.A. Patil, AGP, for Petitioner CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. J. J. DATED: NOVEMBER 27, 2006 NOVEMBER 27, 2006 NOVEMBER 27, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The Petitioners have challenged the order passed in complaint (ULP) No.239 of 1994 dated 29.3.1995 and in Revision Application (ULP) No.47 of 1995 dated 10.9.1996. The complainant, i.e. the respondent-workman had contended that his date of birth was 17.11.1936 and not 21.9.1934 as recorded by the Petitioners. The Labour Court granted interim relief to the Respondent and directed the Petitioners to reinstate the Respondent till the disposal of the main complaint. 2. Aggrieved by this order, the Petitioners had filed the revision application. The Industrial Court dismissed the revision application. This led to the petitioners filing the present Petition. : 2 : 3. While admitting the writ petition, the Petitioners had secured interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b) of the Petition i.e., the orders dated 29.3.1995 and 10.9.1996 at Exhibit C and F to the Petition were stayed. However, the proceedings in the complaint were not stayed. In all probability, therefore, the complaint itself must have been disposed off by now. In the event, the complaint is still pending, the III Labour Court at Pune is directed to dispose of the pending complaint (ULP) No.239 of 1994 within six months from today. 4. Writ Petition stands disposed off.