IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.4718 of 2010(O&M) Date of decision: 2.12.2010 Rakesh Parshad @ Rakesh Kumar …..Appellant versus Smt.Tarawati ……Respondent CORAM: Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jasbir Singh Hon’ble Mr.Justice Augustine George Masih Present: Mr.S.K.Chauhan, Advocate for the appellant Mr.Vikram Singh Prabhakar, Advocate for the respondent Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral) Vide order dated 12.8.2010, subject to deposit of ` 10,000/- by the appellant with the Registry of this Court, to be paid to the respondent- wife towards litigation expenses, notice of motion was issued in this case. Amount was not deposited. On the next date i.e. on 9.11.2010, an undertaking was given that the appellant shall bring a demand draft of ` 10,000/- in the name of the respondent-wife on the next date of hearing i.e. today. There is no compliance with the order passed. Counsel for the appellant states that despite communication sent, the appellant has not responded. In view of above, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. (Jasbir Singh) Judge 02.12.2010 (Augustine George Masih) gk Judge