r;'2- ;u r-i Satya Naraian Singh, Aged 34 years, S/o Snri Guiab Singh, H.No.148, Bajarpara, Viiiage Latori, Gram Panchayat; Latori, P.S. Jainagar, Tahsil Surajpur, District jja (C.G.) \ ~ ' '/ |CMT< ."— &3 F' •s^i 1 The State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Panchayat Evam Gramin Vi Vibhag, D.K.S. Mantraiaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2 District Election Officer, The Collector, District Ambikapur (C.G.) 3 Add. District Election Officer, (Panchayat) The Sub-Diyisiona! Officer, ilock Surajpur, District Ambikapur (CG) 4 The Returning Officer, [Panchayat Election), Ths Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Biock Surajpur, District Surguja (CG) kas U! Mr. J.A. Lohani, Counsei for the petitioner. Mr.V.V.S Murthy, Dy. Advocate Generai with Shri Shashank T-hakur, Panel Lawyerfortherespondents '.1.02.2010) ft \"^f "lea^;iS^ s ;!1 Pfc 'n .^-i? ^ Petitioner -Satya Naraian Slngh has filed this petition Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the followira '(i) That this Hon'ble Court may kindly 'oe p'eased to pursue entire records pertaining to preparation of the Voters List of Gram Panchayat -Latori, for the Panchayat Eiectlon 2010, (AnnexureP/1). ;ii) That this Hon'bie Court may kindly be pteased to iilo'w this Writ Petition further directing the respondents to enter the name Petitloner including the name of Voters residing at Ward No.08 and 09 of Gram Panchayat Latori, as per the Voters List 2008 (Annexure P/1). ;iii) Any other relief as may deemed fit necessan/ & proper by this Hon'ble Court, in view to the above facts & the circumstances of the case be also be given to the Petitioner." The petitioner, thus, in substance is prayinc correction of the Voters List of Ward Nos.8 & 9 of Grs Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that th< elections have been notified on 24.12.2009 and the election process is go'ng on. In the matter of £fecBon_ Cpmmlssion of Thi'ough_Secret8rv^ys,_Ashok_Kumsr_and gthers,__G s rk 'a 'Sia*', •C.C. .216, the Apex Court considered the High Court's jurisdiction to entertain a petitiQn under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and to issue Interim directions after commencement of electorai process. It heid that if the Court's intervention sought for has t'ne effect of interrupting, obstructing or protrscting the eiection proceedings, then, the judidal ^iaps^^ /-.^''.^—^ "'^;!,, /y^ ^ s ^w^ '-r^^ ; ^.~ • /^ •<;.^ '.ss'.''^ '^fe..:.—-^^ ^-1 remedy shouid be posiponed tiii after the comptetion of such proceedings. in the opinion ofthis Court, v/hen the election process is already going on, if the writ petition is entertalned, the effect would'be interrupting in the election process. in view of the above legai posltion, i arn not inclined to entertain this writ petition. The writ petition, therefore, is liable to dismissed and is hereby dismissed summarily. However, the petitioner shaii be at liberty to file an appropriate petition at the appropriate stag before the aDDropriate forum. yy' "f Sd/- SunU Kumar Sinha Judge shvna