HIGH C»URTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RE8PONDENTS Writ Petitiqn(S)No.5871of2{N)7 Bhagchand Chandrawanshi S/o Lste Shri Vishal Singh Chandrawanshi, aged about 46 years, Upper Division Teacher, Higli School Ramatola, R/o Village Sendri, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Director, Public Education Directorate Raipur (CG). 2. District Education OflBcer, EAication Department, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (CG). (WMT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA) <SB: Hon'Ue Mr, Satish K. Aanlhotri, J.) Present : Shri Anup Majumdar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shn A.S. Kachhwaha, Deputy Advocate Oeneral for the State/respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on 15th ofFebruary, 2008) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instruction, submits that the petitioner does not want to press this petition on merit at this stage. However, the petitioner be permitted to make a detailed representation to the concenied authorities, in tiim, the authority coneemed be directed * to consider and decide liis represeiitation expeditiously in accordaace with law on its own merit within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt ofrepresentation. 2. Leamed couiisel appearing for the State/respondents does not oppose. It is ordered, accordingly. 3. The petition is accordingly disposed ofwitli the above-stated liberty and direction. No order asto costs. I.A. No. 02, application for ui^ent hearing also stands disposed of. Sahu Sdt- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge