mGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARHATBItASPUR c' PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRTT PETITIONrQ ^fo._37«M2W7 Gopendra Kumar Baghel S/o K.R.Ba^iel Age 3? Years Wo "Mahamaya Sidhi Traders" Tatyapara, Raipur(C.G.) VERSUS 1. Mumcipal Corporation Through Commissionei-, Raipur (C.G.) 2. State of Chhattisgarh Throu^i - Collector,Raipur(C.G.) WRTT PETTHON UNDER SECTION 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA Single Bench: Hon'bIeJusliceShriSatishK.Agmhotri. Present: „ ShriC.R.Sahu, AdvocatefQrthepetitioner. Shri KashifShakeel, Advocate for the respondent No. 1. Sfari Y.S.Thakur, Govt. Advocate fortheState/respondent No. 2. ORDER (Passed on 28ttday of Jime, 2007) 1. Leamed coynsel appearing forfhe petitioner siibnutsthat the facts aifd ^•s , • question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same as that ofin W.P. (C.) No. 257 af 2007 (DeepakKflmflrShrivasta.vaVs. Municipal Coiporation, Raipur & anotKer), wtuclrhas;sbeen disposed . . afbythisCourt<m2911'March,20D7. ; • l£tG .. 2. Leamed couiisel appearing &r the respective respoBdents do not dispute the above fact. 3. In view ofthe above-stated submissioris rnade by leamed counsel for the parties, fhe writ petition is disposed of in terms ofthe order dated 29th March, 2007 passedfeythis Court in W.P.(G) No. 257 of 2007. No order as to costs. SatishK.Agnihom y^<:'yud@e .L^'-.-;. ..—