a^^^^^':m"- T ^i 0 ^^ IN THS. HIQH GOURTOF CHH&.TT3S;GARH &T BIL^^PUR _( C G _) NRIT PE.TITION N0 » "^ .^ ^J- OP 20_03 /- PKTITIomi®; s 1, Salyed Yaqub Ali^ S,on of S.aiyed Hasham M.1 ^ aged about 40 years^ worklng as Constable ( Telecom )<. /^•r^"'" ^I?: ^<°. ^•^~ ^%-%'-- ,^^-" ^\^%>; ^' '^ ..'v «-!^>' 'y' Arun Kumar Kshatri, Son of S.hri Man Bahad-ar^ aged about 49 years^ working as Head Constable ( Telecom )<, &ewak InduUa^ Son of late , Shri Eteviraaa Indulia, aged about 37 years worklng a& && 2 ( Telecaea ) ( Technical],j l&ll tl^ above petiticners ar^ presently posted in tj Offioe of the S-.uperintendexit of PolAi^s Teleoom C Itedio )» BAlaspyff < OB ) V B R S U S EE^6.pO »BmS; ! ^^ ^^ ^ v^'' lo Uaion of India^ Through ttie Secretary ^ Departinenfc of personnel/publlc" Grievanees ax^3 pe^slon^ Third Ploore Lok Nayak Bh0.wan< Khan Market» Vew DelM^ 2« The Bdvisory Cbramittee ( presided over by Shrl Lohani ) Constituted arrier Se-afeion 7X of the MoPo Re-prgaMsati©saAct^ " 2000» Departraent of General ^aministration^ Vallabh Bhax^an Bhopal^C M,P^ ) 3, State of Madhya pradesh, Thrcugh s The S'.;eoretaxY» Department of H&me Affalrs, Valiabh Bhawan, Bhopal ( M^P.) "ill s$ 2 (3 ?s fiBI ;t.. • %"»'' 4. / S'.tate of Chhafctisgarb,, Through s The S.ecreta.ry^ Departmenfc of Hoae Mfairs^ MaQtralaya, D.eK,S;o Building^ Raipur ( CoG» ) T^RIT pE.TlflON UI^SR ^RTICLES; 226/227 OF THE>. CO .TITUTION OF INDI^ i v3S£si!a.s3vmiBS»fa HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Beiseh: Hon^le Mr, Justice K. Agisihotri. Writ Petition No. 2581 of 2003 Petitioners Saiye.d Yaqub AM & others Verszis Respoiidents Uiiion of India & otliers 1. Shri Rajndra Tripathi, Advocate for fh.e petitioners. Shri S, K, Beriwal, Stsjiding counsel for Respondent No, 1, Shri Sachiii Singh Rajput for Respoiident No. 2 & 3, Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Pajiel lawyer for the respondent No, 4, ORAL ORDER ( 8th Febmary, 2006) The followiiig order of the Court was passed by K. i,J. Leamed counsel appeaxio.g for fhe petitioner sxibmits that the petitioners were workiag in the office of the Supermtendent of Pollce Telecom (Radio), Bilaspzir, The petitioners are peniianeut resident of the distri.cts ia the State of Madhya Pradesh, The petitioners have been ailocated to the State of Chhattisgarh aad they wajit fheir reallocation to the State of Madhya Pradesh. Lea-raed coiinsel for fhe petitioners, on uistniction, STibniits fhat the petitioiiers be granted liberty to make a represeutation to fhe respondents for redressal of their grievaiices, Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection to fhe said siibmissioii, lu view offhe foregoing, the petition staiicls disposed offiiiaUy, wifh libert^7 to tiie petitioners to make aii appropriate representation to fhe respondents/authorities couceraed, withia a period of two weeks from todsj, sjid fhe resppndente/aufliorities are directecl to consider ajid clecide the sajiie, ia an objective manner, iii accordaiice with law, withio. a- period of eight weeks froni fhe date of receipt of fhe representatioii, if a-iiy, Certified copy, as per Rules. Sd/- 2. ThaJ^ur Satish K. Agnihotri Judge