IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.278 of 2010 BINDA DEVI,wife of Sri Hridyanand Singh, resident of village-Amaishi Dihra, P.O.-Daraon, P.S.- Kochas, District-Rohtas. .. .. Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Principal Secretary, Water Resource Department, Government of Bihar, Patna-1. 3. Joint Secretary to Government, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna-1. 4. The Superintending Engineer, Flood Control Circle, Buxar. 5. Sub-Divisional Officer, Sone Nahar Sub-Division, Krishnapur, Buxar. 6. Executive Engineer, Ganga Pump Nahar Pramandal, Chausa District-Buxar. 7. Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Dihari, District-Rohtas. 8. Mr. Kedar Singh, son of late Ram Raj Singh, resident of village-Amaishi Dihra, P.O.-Darhawn, P.S.- Kochas, District-Rohtas. .. Opp.Parties. ----------- 05/ 27-10-2010 Heard. This application has been filed for review of the statement made in the order dated 12-08-2010 passed in C.W.J.C.No.12755 of 2010, although it was dictated in open Court but this fact was not brought to the notice of the Court. The first aspect is that Annexure-7 is addressed to the Executive Engineer by the Superintending Engineer, by which the Executive Engineer has been asked to show cause as to how the settlement was made in favour of the petitioner. The Superintending Engineer has further cancelled Annexure-5, that is the order of 2 settlement for the year 2010-11. The second aspect is that as the Court has noticed that the petitioner has already filed representation before the Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Dihri as contained in Annexure-8, this Court has observed that the petitioner ought to have filed representation before the Superintending Engineer, Flood Control Circle, Buxar. This Court has further observed that the Superintending Engineer should try and accommodate her and grant her settlement for a period of one year and further ordered that the Superintending Engineer should dispose of the matter within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the representation. This part of the order is not changed and will be applicable to both respondent (Kedar Singh) as well as the petitioner. Position and contents of Annexures-7 and 8 has been clarified by the present order. The review application is thus disposed of. A.H./ ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )