THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2226 of 2010 ORDER: Respondent No.1 is the wife of the petitioner. She filed M.O.P.No.145 of 2008 against the petitioner in the Court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kothagudem under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for restitution of conjugal rights. The petitioner was employed as Health Inspector in the South Central Railway and he was working at Railway Hospital, Dornakal. Recently, he was transferred to the Railway Hospital, Tenali. Respondent No.1 filed I.A.No.1408 of 2009 with a prayer to grant temporary injunction to restrain respondent Nos.2 to 4 from transferring respondent No.1 to any other place from Dornakal. The application was opposed by the petitioner and respondent Nos. 2 to 4. The trial Court allowed the I.A. through order, dated 09.10.2009. The same is challenged in this revision. Heard Sri Nuthalapathi Krishnamurthy, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri M.Surender Rao, learned counsel for respondent No.1 and Smt.Pushpinder Kaur, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 to 4. I.A.No.1408 of 2009 filed by respondent No.1 is totally outside the scope of the M.O.P. The limited relief claimed in the O.P. is for restitution of conjugal rights. The place of residence of the petitioner does not make any difference. Being an employee of the Railways, he is under obligation to serve in any place to which he is transferred. The pendency of the M.O.P. for restitution of conjugal rights does not become a ground for scuttling the transfer. The civil revision petition is accordingly allowed and the order under revision is set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:04.08.2010 kdl