IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 417 of 2002 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated in 04-2-2002 WP NO : 26104 OF 2001 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Sankuru Mark, S/o Gnanandam, Licencee M/s Geetanjali Wines, Mangalagiri R/o Pattur Village, Thadepalli Mandal, Guntur District. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 M Ramesh Babu S/o Venkateswara Rao M/s Srinivasa Wines, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 2 The Government of A.P., Revenue (Excise.III) Department rep by its Officer on Special Duty, Secretariat, Hyderabad 3 The Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise, Government of A.P., Hyderabad. 4 The Prohibition and Excise Superintendent Guntur District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: MR.M.CHANDRASEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: MR.CH.DHANAMJAYA The Division Bench of this Court made the following : Judgment follows 2nd page THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 417 of 2002. J U D G M E N T : (Per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) The writ appeal is filed against order dated 04-2-2002 passed in WP.No.26104 of 2001 by the learned single Judge, whereby the learned single Judge allowed the writ petition and set aside the impugned order. 2. When the came up today, Sri Jaganadha Rao, representing Sri M.Chandrasekhar Reddy, the learned counsel for the appellant that the matter has become infructuous and nothing survives in the writ appeal. 3. Recording the above submission, the writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _____________________ JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI ______________________ JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR 04-6-2009. I s L