IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2965 of 2006 GEETA KUMARI, D/o- Late Basant Ram, Resident of Mohalla- Telbigha Domtoli, P.S.- Kotwali, Distt- Gaya :---- Petitioner. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. Mr. Uddav Pandey, The Chief Executive Officer, Gaya Municipal Corporation, Gaya :----Opposite Parties. ----------- 6. 30.04.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the Gaya Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “Corporation”). 2. In compliance of the general direction of the High Court admitted retiral dues of the father of the petitioner has been paid except the Group Insurance Dues which could not be paid as funds for such payment has not been received from the L.I.C. 3. Let the Corporation obtain such fund from the L.I.C. and make payment within one month. So far the payment of family pension is concerned petitioner is directed to file an application giving out her date of birth and the authorities of the Corporation are at liberty to get the same verified by their own doctor and if petitioner is found to be a minor, she must be paid family pension as also its arrears within two months from the date of filing of the application. So far recovery from the arrears of leave salary is concerned, counsel for the petitioner submits that such recovery is wholly without jurisdiction as no order for recovery has ever been - 2 - passed by the Corporation. Let the authorities of the Corporation pass appropriate order in this regard with reference to the leave account of the petitioner within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. For any other grievance petitioner is at liberty to file representation before the authorities of the Corporation which should be considered in accordance with law within one month from the date of its receipt. 4. This contempt application is, accordingly, disposed of. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)