Crl.M.No.M-31273 of 2009 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-31273 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 28, 2010 Hari Singh .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.H.S.Rakkar, Sr.Advocate with Mr.AGS Dhillon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, AAG,Punjab. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.129, dated 2.6.2009, under Sections 452, 307, 436, 511, 342, 427, 294, 120-B, 148, 149 IPC, registered at Police Station Jagraon, District Ludhiana. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully. It has been argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that no injury has been attributed to the petitioner and that he has not been named in the FIR. It has further been contended that petitioner has been continuing in custody since 20.6.2009. Though it has not been disputed by learned State counsel, on instructions from Malkiat Singh, ASI, that no injury has been attributed to the petitioner-accused and that he has not been named in the FIR, however, it is argued that enquiry regarding death of Jarnail Singh alias Jailli and Rajdev Singh alias Raja is pending in the cross-case registered regarding those deaths. Further stated that challan has already been filed against the petitioner-accused. Bail application has been opposed on the plea that petitioner is involved in five other cases and, however, in one of the said Crl.M.No.M-31273 of 2009 (O&M) -2- case, he has already been acquitted. It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in two of the cases under Arms Act after this occurrence, i.e., one is dated 12.6.2009 and another is 19.6.2009. It is further contended that one of the FIR is regarding some dispute at the time of election and that in another FIR as well, no injury has been attributed to him. Trial of the case is not likely to be concluded in near future. No injury has been attributed to the petitioner. He has not been also named in the FIR. Hence, in view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner- Hari Singh for grant of regular bail is accepted. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Ludhiana. 28.4.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge