IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 2ND SEPTEMBER 2011 / 11TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 23980 of 2011(V) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- VISHNU DEV.V., AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.VASANTHAN, VISHNU NIVAS, PAZHAVATHU, CHANGANACHERRY. BY ADV. SRI.PRAKASH KESAVAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE REGISTRAR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM - 686 562. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM - 686 562. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI. T.A. SHAJI, SC, M.G. UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.23980/2011 V APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBIT: P1: COPY OF HALL TICKET ISSUED BY MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 23980 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of September, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner completed B.Tech Electronics and Communication Engineering Course. The petitioner had appeared for the final semester examination and along with the said examination, he had written the subject Advanced Communication System. When the result was declared, he had failed in the above paper. He applied for scrutiny and revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the scrutiny and revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the scrutiny of the answer paper within two weeks and the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for scrutiny and revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/-