1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No.4480/2007 (Tara Ram & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : September 11, 2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.V.R.Choudhary, for the petitioners. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. The petitioners are facing trial for the offences under sections 427 and 447 I.P.C. The petitioners were granted bail but they failed to appear before the trial court. However, after having been arrested, they moved a bail application before the trial court, which came to be rejected by the trial court. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that if the petitioners are granted bail, they will continuously appear before the trial court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial and will not repeat the bail jump. Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances 2 of the case and taking into account the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and petitioners Tara Ram s/o Kassa Ram and Kistur Ram s/o Kalu Ram be released on bail in FIR No.338/2003, P.S. Kotwali, Distt. Pali provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-