IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 16636 of 2006 Between: 1 Sri Pamulapati Omkar Murali, S/o.P.Venkatramaiah, R/o.265-I, Road No.10, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. 2 Sri G.R.V.Prasada Rao, S/o.Sri G.Venkateswara rao, C/o.# 265-I, Road No.10, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. 3 Sri Koneru Eashwar Chandra, S/o.Sri Koneru Murali, C/o.#265-I, Road No.10, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. 4 Sri Bhogineni Kiran Kumar, S/o.Tirupathi Rao, C/o.#265-I, Road No.10, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. 5 Smt.Suchitra Narla, W/o.Sri Naveen Narla, Rep by her G.P.A Holder Sri.Murali Shyam Gottipati, Resident of # 27, Vidyagiri Club Road, Bellary, (on Camp to Hyderabad). 6 Smt.Veeramanchaneni Mani, W/o.Sri Ramesh, R/o.6-3-1112/7, 102, Snow Drop Apartments, Hyderabad-500 016. 7 Smt.Balusa Sridevi, W/o.B.Laxminarayana, R/o. MIG-1/9, Tilak Nagar, Bellary-583104 , (on Comp to Hyderabad). ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, Rep by its Vice Chairman, Hyderabad. 2 The Special Officer & Competent Authority Urban Land Ceiling, Govt. of A.P., Hyderabad R2 is impleaded as per court order dt. 14-8-2006 in WPMP 21249 of 2006 ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proposal to auction the lands (originally scheduled to be held on 24-07-2006) belonging to the Petitioners in Sy.No.6 & 7 of Izzatnagar, Serilingampally mandal, Ranga Reddy District by the Respondent as without jurisdiction, illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the same and to pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.V.S.CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent No.: M.DHANANJAY REDDY(SC FOR HUDA) The Court made the following : ORDER: Sri S.V.S.Chowdary, learned counsel for the petitioners filed a letter in the registry stating that subsequent to filing of this writ petition, the petitioners have applied for the regularization of the disputed land and the government has accepted the regularization by issuing a G.O in favour of the petitioners and, therefore, they seek permission of the court to withdraw the writ petition. Accordingly, permission is granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. N.V.RAMANA,J DT.16.3.2009 msv