IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.53 of 2005 THAKUR PRASAD BHAGAT S/O LATE RAGHUNATH BHAGAT,R/O MOHALLA- MAHARANJGANJ, PS- & DISTT- JAMUI----PETITIONER Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 2. THE SECRETARY, BSEB, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD,PATNA 3. THE JOINT SECY. BSEB, PATNA 4. THE FINANCE CONTROLLER-1, BSEB, VIDYUT BHAWAN, PATNA 5. THE DY. DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNTS BSEB, PATNA—RESPONDENTS. ---------- 3 2.2.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. After perusing the counter affidavit learned counsel for the petitioner fairly concedes that if as a matter of policy decision commutation of pension is not being allowed to the employees then he is not willing to insist on such payment. He however has made a grievance that despite a categorical statement with regard to payment of revised pay arrear from 1.4.97 to 31.10.99 he has not received even a single instalment though the statement has been made that payment has been made in 30 equal instalments. The Board is also silent on the revised pay scale. In view of above this writ application is disposed of with a direction upon the respondent no.2, Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board that he shall examine the matter as to why the petitioner has not been paid the arrears of salary as noted above even in instalments and as what is the impediment for payment of revised pay scale. The Court expects positive action in this regard within a period of three months from the date of communication or production of a copy of this order. This writ application stands disposed of with the above direction. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)