IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA THURSDAY, THE 3RD JUNE 2010 / 13TH JYAISTHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 2704 of 2010() --------------------------------- CRIME NO. 121/2010 0F KURATHIKAD POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT ........................ PETITIONER/ACCUSED : ---------------------------- VINOD, S/O.SARASWATHYAMMA, CHANDRALAYAM, THEKKEKKARA P.O., MAVELIKKARA. BY ADV. SRI.RASHEED C.NOORANAD RESPONDENT: --------------- S.I. OF POLICE, KURATHIKAD POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM. BY SRI. M.S.BREEZ PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K. HEMA, J. --------------------------- B.A. No. 2704 of 2010 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 3rd day of June, 2010 O R D E R This petition is for anticipatory bail. 2. The alleged offence is under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code. According to prosecution, petitioner married de facto complainant on 06.12.2000 and petitioner was harassing de facto complainant physically and mentally. He misappropriated gold ornaments and cash given to the de facto complainant. On 20.12.2009, when the de facto complainant and petitioner were travelling in a bike, he pushed down the de facto complainant and she sustained injuries. There is also an allegation that petitioner is leading an immoral life with another woman. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that there are no serious allegations in the complaint. There was only a motor accident. It is also submitted that though de facto complainant would allege that the marital relationship is strained, motor accident happened only on 20.12.2009 and it is clear that parties B.A. No. 2704 of 2010 2 were having cordial relationship and that they were living together. 4. This petition is opposed. On hearing both sides, considering the nature of the allegations made, I do not think it fit to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner. The petitioner has not made out any ground to get anticipatory bail. This petition is dismissed. K. HEMA, JUDGE ln