o w £ c^^<<TZ7 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(C) N0. 2-^^L( /2011. PETITIONERS ^^ (V' ^'^y (^./S!^T ?bx.-''/i,,y ^/^•^ •o^l^' . «t-' <[v :1. Bharat Kumar Gabel, S/o Ahivaranlal Gabel, aged about 55 years, 2. Granth Kumar, S/o Ahivaranlal Gabel, aged about 50 years, 3. Vijay Kumar, S/o Ahivaranlal Gabel, aged about 45 years, 4. Kaushal Kumar, S/o Ahivaranlal Gabel, aged about 40 years, 5. Gulab Kunwar, Wd/olate Ahivaranlal Gabel, aged about 65 years, Note: All are residents of village Thakurdiya, P.S. & Tahsil Kharsiya, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). Versus ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Collector and Ex-Officio Secretary, Govt. ofC.G., Raigarh (C.G.). 2. The Collector, Raigarh (C.G.). 3. The Land Acquisition Officer, Kharsiya, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). 4. The Sub Divisional Officer, Kharsiya, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA RESPONDENTS ^ 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER : As Stated in the cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS : As stated in the cause-title. PETITI RESPONDENTS HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRiT PETiTION (C) N0. 2304 OF 201 1 Bharat Kumar Gabel & Others Versus State of Chhattisp.arh & Others 0/Vrit Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constttution of India) Single Bench : Horfble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. ' Shri Ratan Pusty, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri V.V.S.Moorthy, Dy: Advocate General forthe State. ORDER(ORAU onthis10thdayofMay,2011) ^ 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side has no objection. 3. It is ordered as prayed for. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. ^ Ashok