cg? \W7/ i IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.(s1No. Hot) mew“ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE C PETITIONER : Ranban Das, S/o Singh, aged about 23 R/o. Village Machaha, Badra ‘B’, Distt. (C.G.) ‘ RESPONDENTS VERSUS : 1./State of Chhattisgarh ” Through :— The Secretary, /.” \fpaxwww \Q’(b¢.w%?"°x‘w Education Department, Bhawan, Rajpur (C.G.) . é€k\a 2./ Joint Director, Treasury ‘axx ........ Account & Pension, HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 409 OF 2011 Petitioner I Ranban Das Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & Another (Writ Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of india) Single Bench : Hon‘ble Shti Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Somkant Verma, Advocatefor the petitioner. ‘ Shri Y.S. Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the State. ORDER ORAL (Pgssed on this 24‘ day of January. 201 1) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the case, being payment of retiral benefits matter, may be referred to the pension committee. 2, Shri Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General appearing for the State agrees with the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and submits that the request of the petitioner is genuine and proper and the same order may be passed. 3. This Court, in the matter of W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandel v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others) and other Connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar v. State Govemment and others) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhath’sgarh & Others v. Baijnath Mandel and another). Thus, this .\\. \petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31" ‘\. x of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642/2004 Baijnath Manda! (supra) as submitted by learned counsel appearing for the parties. 4. This petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms i.e. the office of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the petition from the petitioner and this order. Thereafter, the Committee shail issue notice to the petitioner and the officers concerned, within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may tile additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retirai dues, if any, to the petitioner be completed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. The petitioner shall supply extra copy of the petition to the learned counsel appearing for the respondent's for forwarding the same to the Committee. Sd/-‘ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Aruri