IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3799 of 2008 MAHESHWAR PRASAD, SON OF LATE CHANDRADHARI PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – AZAD NAGAR GANJ, P.O. – SIMRI BAKHTIYARPUR, DISTRICT - SAHARSA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MADHEPURA. 3. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, MURLIGANJ, DISTRICT – MADHEPURA ----------- 02. 29.10.2009 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the payment of retiral dues and other dues as indicated in paragraph – 1 of the writ application. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner retired from the post of Panchayat Sevak from Murliganj Block in the district of Madhepura, however, retiral dues of the petitioner has not been finally settled as yet. Learned counsel for the State submits that in case a fresh representation giving specific details of the claim as also the copy of the relevant documents in support of the claim is filed, the same shall be considered in accordance with law without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his pending claims, as raised in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file representation before the respondent no. 2. In this view of the matter, it is directed that in case such representation is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order, the above respondent shall consider and dispose of the same by a reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievance of the petitioner as raised in the representation could be settled without further delay. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)