.IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 840 of 2008 Madan Mohan Johar S/o late Chunnilal Johar …… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others …… Respondents Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, government Advocate with Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. JUDGMENT Hon. J.C.S. RAWAT, J. Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G. S. Sandhu, Government Advocate with Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. On due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR and supplementary affidavit; and perusal of the Income Tax PAN Card of the petitioner; I am of the opinion that it is not a fit case for grant of the reliefs sought by the petitioner in the writ petition. I am refraining from commenting on the merits of the case lest it may adversely affect the case of the petitioner at the trial, which the petitioner is yet to face. However, in view of the fact that the petitioner is aged about 79 years as alleged in the petition it is directed that the trial court shall dispose of the bail petition of the petitioner expeditiously without waste of time. The writ petition, therefore, is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. Stay application stands disposed of accordingly. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 07.11.2008 LSR