IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32601 of 2010 MD.MURTZA & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 02.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel for the state. Petitioners, namely, Md. Murtaza and Md. Shahin apprehend their arrest in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 259 of 2007 for offences punishable under Sections 419, 486/34 of the IPC. Admittedly, the F.I.R. was instituted under bailable sections i.e. 419 and 486/34 of the IPC and the petitioners were granted regular bail by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul. But subsequently, after competition of the investigation, police submitted charge sheet under non- bailable sections and thereafter, petitioners moved before the sessions court for grant of anticipatory bail. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, this anticipatory bail petition stands disposed of with direction to the petitioners to appear before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul within 30 days from the date of receipt of the order and if petitioners do so, the learned court below shall permit them to remain on bail which has been granted by the learned court below itself. As prayed let the order be communicated to the court concerned through fax at the cost of the petitioners. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)