HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.23179 of 2011 Date : 29-11-2011 Between: Smt. Y. Vimala Reddy .. Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by the Special Deputy Collector(LA), Unit IV, ORR, HMDA, Tarnaka, Hyderabad .. Respondent Counsel for petitioner : Sri Vijay B. Paropakari Counsel for respondent : Sri Y. Ravindra The Court made the following: ORDER: The grievance of the petitioner in this Writ Petition is that compensation in respect of the land acquired from her is not paid and instead the Land Acquisition Officer has proposed to refer the matter to the Civil Court under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short "the Act"). This Court has disposed of W.P.No.2247/2010, by order dated 10-2-2010, in which an identical issue had arisen, with the direction to the Land Acquisition Officer to consider the claim of the petitioner therein for payment of compensation. It is apt to refer to the relevant portion of the said order : “Inasmuch as the petitioner claims to be the owner of the land in question by virtue of a registered sale deed, and as no opportunity was given to her to participate in the enquiry, and as she is not questioning the quantum of compensation, I deem it appropriate to quash award No.02/2009 in file No.36/LA/Unit-5/ORR/2008, dated 15-09-2009, to the limited extent of referring the matter to the Court under Sections 30 and 31 of the Act, and permit the petitioner to file claim petition, seeking compensation for the land in question, together with the supporting documentary evidence, before respondent No.3 within a period of four weeks from today. On such claim petition being filed, respondent No.3 is directed to consider the same and pass supplementary award, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of two months therefrom.” As it is agreed at the hearing that this Writ Petition is similar to the above mentioned Writ Petition, this Writ Petition is also disposed of in terms of the order passed in the said Writ Petition with the direction that the reasons and the directions contained therein shall form part of this order. ________________________ Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy Date : 29-11-2011 AM