IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.30897-M of 2010 Date of Decision:18.1.2011 Vikas .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. J.S. Dahiya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Rana, D.A.G. Haryana. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for transfer of investigation of the case FIR No.212 dated 29.7.2010 under Sections 328/302/506/34 IPC to any other independent agency. Serious allegations have been levelled in the FIR. As per the allegations, the mother of the petitioner was killed by respondents No.5 to 9 by giving poison by calling her to their house on the excuse to return their money. Upon notice, reply dated 22.11.2010 has been filed by the State stating therein that the result from the FSL Madhuban has been received and as per the report dated 24.9.2010 an organophosphorous pesticide was detected. However, the said sample was sent to PGIMS Rohtak and opinon of the doctor was awaited. Today, the State has filed the status report. It is submitted in the said report that in this case investigation was conducted by Sh. Sultan Singh Inspector/SHO Police Station Rai, District Sonipat and DSP Asandh, Crl. M. No.30897-M of 2010 -2- District Karnal as directed by IGP Rohtak, Range Rohtak. In the status report, there is no mention of the opinion of the Doctor. In fact, it is submitted that during investigation no offence has been found to be committed by the accused. The facts of the case be brought to the notice of IGP Rohtak, Range Rohtak, who shall personally hear the complainant and satisfy himself with the investigation conducted in the present case and if he is not satisfied with the inquiry, the same be handed over to a Senior Officer not below the Rank of SP, Crime, to further investigate the matter. In case, the investigation is handed over to the said official, he shall conduct the same within a stipulated period of 3 months and submit final report thereafter. In case, the IGP, Rohtak, Range Rohtak, is satisfied, then speaking order to the said fact be placed on record before this Court. Disposed of in the above terms. 18.1.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE