IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5697 of 2011 ANISH RAMAN & ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 06.04.2011 Petitioners being the father and the proposed groom are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 406, 504, 323 of the I.P.C. and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is alleged that complainant spent Rs. 5,51,101/- for performing engagement ceremony with petitioner No. 2 but subsequently the marriage has not been finalized and now the boy has married with someone else. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the marriage could not be solemnized due to the latches on the part of the complainant. Let the petitioners deposit Rs. 1,25,000/- before the learned Court below. Let the aforesaid amount be invested in some fixed deposit scheme which will be subject to the result of the case. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners namely 1. Anish Raman 2. Rebti Raman, on deposit of the aforesaid amount before learned Court below and in the event of their arrest or surrender before 2 the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate(East) Muzaffarpur in connection with Complaint Case No. 377 of 2010, Trial No. 2183 of 2010. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)