IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2822/2007 IN ITXA (L) NO.1485/2004 (The CIT Mumbai V/s.Triloksingh P.Rajpal) ____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memo- ¦ -randa of Coram, Apperances¦ Court’s or Judges Orders Courts orders or directions¦ and Prothonotary’s orders ¦ -------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & A.V.NIRGUDE, JJ. A.V.NIRGUDE, JJ. A.V.NIRGUDE, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 30th April, 2008 30th April, 2008 30th April, 2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard the learned Counsel Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. None appears for the Respondent though served. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 836 days’ delay caused in filing an application for restoration of an Appeal which was rejected by the learned Prothonotary & Sr.Master on 8.2.2005 for non-removal of office objections. It is stated that the delay was caused due to the process of Annual General Transfer in the Income Tax Department & the administrative difficulties etc. However the said reason does not appear to be justifiable. No sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay caused in filing the restoration application. Hence, the Notice of Motion stands dismissed. (A.V.NIRGUDE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (A.V.NIRGUDE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (A.V.NIRGUDE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)