IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 10439 of 2008 Between: Thalaria Yadavva, W/o. Chennakeshavulu, R/o. Mundrai Village, Nangnoor Revenue Mandal, Medak District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Siddipet, Medak District. 2 The Tahsildar, Nangnoor Mandal, Medak District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent No.2 herein in not considering the representation dt. 1-9- 2007 submitted by the petitioner for furnishing of the Certified copies of the pahanies in respect of Sy.Nos. 192 and 198, 13(B) Certificate and RORO Copy despite the endorsement made by the 1st respondent as illegal, arbitrary, and consequently direct the respondnet No.2 herein to furnish the ceritified copies sought for by thepetiitoner inhis representation dt. 1-9-2007, and to grant Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.GOVATHOTI BHASKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 10439 of 2008 Oral order: The petitioner claims to be absolute owner and possessor of various extents of land situated in Survey Nos.192, 198 and 199 of Gundrai village, Nangnoor Mandal, Medak District, having purchased the same under various sale deeds. The petitioner states that for the purpose of obtaining loan from the banks, she made several representations, the latest being on 18.02.2008, requesting respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to furnish certified copies of Pahanis for the years 1989-90 to 2006-2007 as also 13(B) Certificate and also copy of ROR, but till date no action thereon had been taken. Hence, she filed the present writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, and both of them agreed for disposal of the writ petition with the following directions: Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are directed to consider and dispose of the representation dated 18.02.2008 of the petitioner for furnishing certified copies of Pahanis for the years 1989-90 to 2006-2007 as also 13(B) Certificate and also copy of ROR, and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, expeditiously. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 02nd May 2008 KSR/Nsr