IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34872 of 2010 ASHOK CHOUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR 3 08.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Petitioner, Ashok Choudhary seeks his bail in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 88 of 2008/ registered under sections 302/34 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, the petitioner and deceased had taken a franchise from Electricity Department but subsequently, some defalcation was made by the petitioner and when the deceased insisted upon the petitioner to return the aforesaid defalcated amount, the petitioner committed murder of the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as a matter of fact, the aforesaid franchise had been taken by a society in which the petitioner was chairman but subsequently, in the year, 2006, he parted himself from the aforesaid society and his resignation was accepted by the Secretary of that society. The Secretary of aforesaid society was none else but the wife of the deceased. Considering the facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, the petitioner, namely, Ashok Choudhary is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Raghopur P. S. Case No. 88 - 2 - of 2008 to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Birpur at Supaul. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.) insist