IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTYFIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY WRIT APPEAL No.39 of 2008, 951 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION No.2322 & 22289 of 2008 W.A.No.39 of 2002: Between: The Sub-Registrar, Kadapa ..... Appellants/Petitioners AND B.Brahmaiah and others. ....Respondents/Respondents W.A.No.951 of 2007: Between: The Sub-Registrar, Srikalahasti, Chittoor District And another. ..... Appellants/Petitioners AND N.Raja Reddy and others. ....Respondents/Respondents W.P.No.2322 of 2008: Between: Ranam Nageswara Rao ..... Petitioner AND The Tahsildar, Rajampet Mandal and another. .... Respondents W.P.No.22289 of 2008: Between: B.Chandrasekhar ..... Petitioner AND The Sub-Registrar, Kadapa and others. .... Respondents COMMON JUDGMENT : (PER HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO) Since the question involved in all these matters are one and the same, all these matters are taken up together for disposal. Learned counsel on either side submits that these writ appeals and writ petitions are squarely covered by the judgment in W.A. No.950 of 2007 dated 30.12.2008. Following the same, the writ appeal Nos.39 of 2002 and 951 of 2007 are dismissed and the writ petition Nos.2322 and 22289 of 2008 are allowed. ________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J _________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J AUGUST 25, 2009 KSH