1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO 7022 OF 2006 [ K.R.V.Shikshan Santstha Padegaon through Chairman Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri P.N. Sonpethkar, Advocate for Petitioner Shri V.H.Dighe,A.G.P.for Respondent- State. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 23rd JULY, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in view of the affidavit-in-reply filed by the respondents, the petition can be disposed of. 3. In the light of the statement made by 2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders the counsel the Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- Sd/- [K.K. TATED, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] MTK