BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Third day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15209 of 2011 1 AMSAVALLI 2 PONNAIYAN ... PETITIONERS Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CONTONMENT POLICE STATION, TRICHIRAPALLI, CR NO.1721/2011 ... RESPONDENT For Petitioner : M/S. S.MUTHUKRISHNAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Addl.Public Prosecutor(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 448, 427, 323 of IPC read with Section 4 of Women Harassment Act in Crime No.1721 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police. They have approached this Court for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. Heard Mr.S.Muthukrishnan, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Durai Pandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit in his argument that due to civil dispute, the petitioners have been falsely implicated and they are innocent persons and they have nothing to do with the alleged offences. He would also submit in his argument that they are also having permanent residence and therefore, he would request for the grant of anticipatory bail. 4. The Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side)would submit in his argument that the investigation is pending and if for any reason, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners, suitable conditions may be passed for the secured presence of the petitioners. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, of course, subject to certain stringent conditions. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the Judicial Magistrate concerned on executing separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Trichirappalli, and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks for the purpose of interrogation. 7. The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail petition shall stand automatically cancelled. Sd/- 23/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II TRICHIRAPPALLI 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CONTONMENT POLICE STATION, TRICHIRAPALLI 3 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. S.MUTHUKRISHNAN Advocate SR.No.41048 ssk/28.11.2011 /5c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15209 of 2011 Date :23/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/