IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4556 of 2009 Ram Swarath Rai, son of late Punni Lal Rai, resident of village Chaputa, P.S. Hajipur, District-Vaishali ………. Petitioner Versus 1. The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Labour and Welfare, New Delhi. 2. Secretary, Public Grievance and Pension Cell, Ministry of Labour and Welfare, New Delhi 3. Central Provident Fund Commissioner, New Delhi 4. The Provident Fund Commissioner, Bihar, Patna 5. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Guwahati, Range, Assam, through the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Bihar, Patna 6. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Regional Office, North- East Zone, G.S. Road, Bhanagara, Guwahati, Assam ……. Respondents ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Choudhary Shyam Nandan, Advocate For the Provident Fund:- Mr. R.S. Pradhan, Sr. Advocate For Union of India:- Mr. Sarva Deo Singh, Advocate ------------ 2. 10.04.2009 Learned counsel for the Provident Fund Commissioner submits that the writ application is not maintainable as no part of the cause of action has arisen within the State of Bihar. Learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to satisfy this Court on the point of any part of the cause of action having arisen within the State. In the above circumstances, the writ application is not maintainable before this Court and it is accordingly dismissed. S.Pandey (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.)