IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- Crl. W. P. No. 1843 of 2010 Date of decision:- April 5, 2011 Madho Ram ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & Ors ... Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present:- Mr. H.S.Jaswal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Shekhar Mudgal, DAG, Haryana. Gurdev Singh, J (oral) It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has already been granted the relief, claimed in the present writ petition, by the concerned authority and that the present petition has become infructuous and be dismissed as such. Dismissed as having become infructuous. April 5, 2011 (Gurdev Singh) tripti Judge