IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 66 of 2011. Decided on: 14.10.2011 Raj Dulari …Petitioner. Versus Shrikant Baldi & Ors. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No. For the petitioner : Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Dy. Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant AG for the respondents. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. R.P. Singh, learned Assistant Advocate General on the basis of instructions imparted to him submits that the judgment in question has been implemented in letter and spirit. As per operative part of the judgment, the petitioner shall be deemed to be in service for all intents and purposes with effect from 19.9.1996 onwards. However, it is made clear that the petitioner shall be entitled to seniority w.e.f. 19.9.1996. Consequently, the contempt petition stands disposed of. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. October, 14, 2011 (Krn Guleria) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.