IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No. 80241-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: FEBRUARY 20, 2007 Pardeep Kumar Sharma ...PETITIONER VERSUS State of Haryana ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr.P.S.Jammu , Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Siddharth Sarup, AAG, Haryana. ... Petitioner Pardeep Kumar Sharma apprehending his arrest in a non-bailable offence in case FIR No.656 dated 19.8.2006 registered under Sections 420/467/468/471 IPC at Police Station City Sirsa, District Sirsa, has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail. I have heard the counsel for the parties. Counsel for the petitioner contends that after registration of the case, the petitioner filed an application for release of the vehicle on sapurdari and the same has now been released to him. Counsel further contends that the petitioner is the registered owner of the motor-cycle and he has not been named in the FIR. Counsel also contends that in the FIR, which has been registered against co-accused Raj Kumar, the petitioner has been falsely implicated during investigation being owner of the vehicle. Counsel further contends that in terms of the interim order dated December 22, 2006, the petitioner has joined the investigation. This fact has not been disputed by the State counsel and he further states that the petitioner is no more required for further investigation. In view of the above, the interim order dated December 22, 2006 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions. Disposed of accordingly. February 20, 2007 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE