IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.4129 of 2010 Date of decision: 10.12.2010 Dharampal and others ....Petitioners Versus Gulab Chand and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. S.K. Jain, Advocate, for the respondents. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Undisputedly, plaintiffs/petitioners were not executants of the sale deed in question, hence In view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of Suhrid Singh @ Sardool Singh Vs. Randhir Singh and others, 2010(2) RCR (Civil) 564, plaintiffs are not liable to pay ad vlorem court fee. Undisputedly, in the suit plaintiffs have not claimed relief for possession, hence at this stage no ad valorem court fee is required to be paid. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. Order dated 21.10.2004 is quashed. Parties are directed to appear before the trial Court on 20.1.2011. (Alok Singh) Judge December 10, 2010 R.S.