1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.1557 OF 2006 PETITION NO.1557 OF 2006 PETITION NO.1557 OF 2006 Subhash Balwant Bapat .... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondents None for Petitioner Ms.S.D.Shinde,A.P.P. for Respondents CORAM CORAM CORAM : : : J.N.PATEL AND J.N.PATEL AND J.N.PATEL AND SMT.ROSHAN SMT.ROSHAN SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ DALVI, JJ DALVI, JJ DATED DATED DATED : 11th October, 2006 : 11th October, 2006 : 11th October, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. None for the petitioner. 2. On the last date, we have directed the petitioner to annexe copy of the FIR so that this Court would assess whether the FIR discloses a cognisable offence. The learned A.P.P has 2 submitted that the complaint lodged by the petitioner disclosed non-cognizable offence and therefore, a certificate to that effect was issued after recording offences under section 523, 504, 506 IPC registered vide N.C.complaint No. 1128/2005 on 9th July, 2005. Taking the true copy of the FIR furnished by the A.P.P. on record, the same is marked X for identification. 3. On going through the substance of the matter, we do not find that any cognizable offence is made out from the report lodged by the petitioner nor any allegations in the petition make out such a case so as to direct the respondents to register the offence and investigate the matter and take action against the police Officers who were at the relevant time posted at Pant Nagar Police Station and failed to take cognizance of the matter. 4. Petition is dismissed. (Smt (Smt (Smt R.S.Dalvi,J) R.S.Dalvi,J) R.S.Dalvi,J) (J.N.Patel,J) (J.N.Patel,J) (J.N.Patel,J)