( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2956 OF 2005 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2956 OF 2005 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2956 OF 2005 IN IN IN APPEAL (LODGING) NO.835 OF 2005 APPEAL (LODGING) NO.835 OF 2005 APPEAL (LODGING) NO.835 OF 2005 IN IN IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2621 OF 2004 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2621 OF 2004 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2621 OF 2004 IN IN IN SUIT NO.2660 OF 2004 SUIT NO.2660 OF 2004 SUIT NO.2660 OF 2004 Krishnakant Ranchoddas Lotlia .. Appellant V/s Recovery Officer of DRT & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.R.V.Govilkar for the Appellant. Mr.John Danial for Respondent No.2. CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATE : 21.10.2005. DATE : 21.10.2005. DATE : 21.10.2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant and the learned Counsel for Respondent No.2. None appears for the Respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4 though served. The learned Counsel for the Appellant undertakes to file an affidavit of service within a period of two weeks from today. 2. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated therein, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay in filing the Appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence of want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) ( 2 ) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)