COURT 0 BNGAIORE DATFI) THIS TUE i1 DAY OF JUNE 2010 BEFORE THE HON t BLE MR. JUSTICE A.5.PACHHAPURE G.R1MINAL APPE..L NO.82 G.E 2010 BETWEEN I Y R LKSEIiNAPYANA RAG S/ 0 LATE Y. RAGHAVENDRA RAO NOW AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/A NO ..1.O.,.. ND CROSS, 8TH MILE. CIRCLE B.HUANSHWARI NAGAR, HESARGHATTA ROAD T-DASARAHALL1, BANGALORE- 57. NOW R/A NO.39, SR1NIVASA KRUPA,SBI RAGHA VENDRA NAGAR, 1ST MAiN 2ND CROSS, V1DYAMANYA NAGAR, VISHWA NEEDAN POST, BANGALORE-91. APPELLANT (BY SRI:BALARAM LAW FIRM, ADV., FOR APPELLANT) AND 1 D.K.DWARAKANATH NOW AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS P/A NC. 48, SRi SADGURU NILAYA iim iRu iuuc THYAGARRJANAGAR NT0TW. RESPONDENT CRL.A. FILED U/S.378 CR,P.C BY THE ADV. FOR THE APPELLANT PRAYING THAT THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 16.11.2009 PASSED BY THE XII ADDL. C.M.M., BANGALORE ACQUITING THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S. 138 OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT THIS CRL.A. COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Learned Counsel for the appellant is absent. Two weeks time grant€d as a last. chance to comply the office ohjections If trie Office oLectcs are rot oople within ue time aranted, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the eneh. SD/—J1JDGE