HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIViSION BENCH CORAiVI: HON'BLESHRIRAJEEVGUPTA,C.J. HON'BLE SHRS RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR,J Miscellaneous ADpeal (C) No.987 of 2007 Apoellants 1 Smt Rani Keshri, Wd/o Ramesh Kumar Keshari, Aged about - 44 years 2 Ashish Kumar Keshari, S/o Late Ramesh Kumar Keshri, Aged about 23 years 3 Ku. Ankita Keshri, D/o Late Ramesh Kumar Keshri, Aged about 21 years t. 4 Ku Akansha Keshri, D/o Late Ramesh Kumar Keshri, Aged about 17 years 5 Abhishek Kehri, S/o Late Ramesh Kumar Keshri, Aged about 1 5 years The appeilant No.4 & 5 through lega! guardian Smt Rani Keshri, AppeiEant No.01 Ali are re^ident of Pendra, Tahsil Pendra Road, Dlstrict Bilaspur.(CG) VERSUS Respondents 1 Moh Suieman, S/o Sheikh Shahabuddin, Aged about 36 years, Occupation - Driver, R/o Kachhi MohaSia, Dhanpuri; Djstrict - Shahdoi (MP) 2 Navin Goyal, S/o Late GD Goyal, Dlrector/Pianning Construction Pvt Limited, New DeEhi, Address : Bank Mod, Near Gujrati School, Dhanbad, PS & Distt Dhanbad, Present Address : RK Mishra, 14/625, Vinoba Nagar, Biiaspur Distt - Bilaspur (CG) 3 Bajaj Aioyance General Insurance Company Limited, Chohan Complex, Behlnd Rajkumar CoSSege, Raipur (CG) 4 Vijay Kumar Kesharwani, S/o Late Hajari Lai Kesharwani, Proprietor : Sukh Suvidha Gandhi Chowk, Manendragarh, Tahsil Manendragarh, Distt-Korea(CG) 5 United India Insurance Company Limited, Ambikapur TahsiE'& District ~ Sarguja (CG) Miscellaneous Appeai under Section 173 of l^otor VehicSe Act Present : None for the appellants. Shri GS Patel, counsei for respondent No.3. Shri Pankaj Agrawal, counsel for respondent No.5. QRDER subbu sth (15tn December, 2010) The fotlowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. None for the appellants. 2) As there is no representation on behaif of the appellants, we are left with no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge \^