1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 317 OF 2005 Baburao Pilaji Hajare ........Appellant versus Ananta Savleram Hajare & ors........ Respondents. Mr. P.S. Dani adv. for the Appellant Mr. T.D. Deshmukh adv. for the respondents 2 to 4. CORAM: RANJIT V. MORE, J. DATED : 05th DECEMBER,2008. P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Dani learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Deshmukh for the respondents 2 to 4. The appellant/original plaintiff's suit for specific performance of reconveyance. was decreed by the trial court. The appeal to the lower appellate court at the instance of the respondent/defendant, however, was allowed and the trial court's decree was set aside. The lower appellate court after appreciating evidence on record recorded the finding that the appellant/plaintiff could not prove that his father sold out suit property to the deceased defendant with a condition to repurchase. Apart from this the agreement of reconveyance was alleged to have executed in the year 1951. This agreement has not signed by the deceased father of the appellant/plaintiff. The suit is filed in the year 1992 i.e. after 2 expiry of the period of 15 years. In these facts and circumstances I am not inclined to interfere in the second appeal. Second appeal is accordingly dismissed. (R. V. More, J.)