IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 2216 of 2011. [O&M] Date of Decision: 14th February, 2011. Kulwant Singh Petitioner through Mr. Sunil Toni, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents through Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner who is a Head Constable in the Punjab Police, is aggrieved by the order dated 25.01.2011 passed by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Faridkot directing him to vacate the Family Quarter No. SI/5, Police Lines, Faridkot. It is a fact that the afore-stated quarter is meant for the police officers in the rank of ASI/SI etc. whereas the petitioner is only a Head Constable. It appears that the subject quarter was allotted to him as he belongs to a family of terrorists' victims. The SSP, Faridkot has cancelled the allotment on the ground that the petitioner created a scene in an inebriated condition. The dispossession of the petitioner from the subject Quarter was stayed vide order dated 04.02.2011 with liberty to the SSP, Faridkot to shift him to some other Quarter of his entitlement as per the petitioner's rank and pay. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of in the same terms, namely, that the dispossession of the petitioner from the subject Quarter shall remain stayed with liberty to the SSP, Faridkot to allot and shift him to a Quarter to which he is entitled to as per his rank and pay scale. Disposed of. Dasti. February 14, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE