IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6245 of 2008 SUDHIR MANDAL & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 03. 30.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The present application has been filed for quashing of the order dated 06.10.2007 passed by the learned Sessiions Judge, Madhepura in Criminal Revision No. 55 of 2007 whereby learned Sessions Judge has affirmed the order dated 28.02.2007 passed by the learned C.J.M., Madhepura in Complaint Case No. 151(C) of 2005 by which cognizance has been taken under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 380 and 365 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the present complaint case arises out of Bihariganj P.S. Case No.21 of 2004 in which the police submitted final form on 28.05.2004. Subsequently on protest the cognizance was taken. It is next submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have been roped in the present case only because the petitioners were the witnesses against the informant in a case and for that petitioners were being threatened. It is further submitted by the petitioners that petitioner No. 1 has filed a complaint being Complaint Case 2 No. 58C of 2004 against the informant also. In view of the fact that the matter is at the level of framing of charges, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. However, petitioners are at liberty to raise all these issues at the time of framing of charge, if the charges have already not been framed. With these observations, the application stands dismissed. Shageer (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)