THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.22452 of 2009 Dated: 22.04.2010 Between: K.Nagarajamma. … Petitioner. And The District Collector, Anantapur, Anantapur District, and others. … Respondents. ORDER: Aggrieved by the action of the 3rd respondent-Tahsildar, Narpala Mandal, Anantapur District, in issuing the proceedings dated 16.09.2009, suspending the petitioner’s dealership authorization for Fair Price Shop of Kuraganipally village of Narpala Mandal, the petitioner filed the present writ petition. The 3rd respondent-Tahsildar, Narpala Mandal, Anantapur District, filed a detailed counter affidavit specifically stating that aggrieved by the impugned proceedings dated 16.09.2009, the petitioner has already filed an appeal before the 2nd respondent- Revenue Divisional Officer, Anantapur and the same is pending. Learned counsel for the petitioner admitted the fact of the petitioner preferring an appeal before the 2nd respondent against the impugned proceedings. This Court, while issuing notice before admission on 20.10.2009, granted interim suspension of the impugned order. Heard the learned counsel on either side and they agreed to dispose of the writ petition with the following directions: “The 2nd respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer, Anantapur, is directed to dispose of the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the impugned proceedings dated 16.09.2009 issued by the 3rd respondent, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. Till such time, interim suspension granted on 20.10.2009 shall continue.” Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _____________ N.V.RAMANA,J 22.04.2010 v v