IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. L.P.A. No. 104 of 2011. Decided on: 4th August, 2011. State of Himachal Pradesh and others. ….. Petitioner. Versus Ram Kali. …… Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the appellants. : Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. For the respondent. : Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral): C.M.P. (M) No. 416 of 2011. Allowed. Delay condoned. L.P.A. No. 104 of 2011. State has come in appeal against the judgment dated 5th April, 2010. It is seen that the learned Single Judge though observed that the case is covered by the decision of Phool Maya Vs. State of H.P. and others, a direction was issued to confer work charge status on the basis of the decision in Mool Raj Upadhyaya Vs. State of H.P. and others 1994 Supp. (2) SCC 316. It is made clear that the respondent being Nepali citizen, the judgment that would be 2 applicable to her will be either Man Singh Vs. State of H.P. or Phool Maya Vs. State of H.P. and others. Subject to the above clarification, the appeal is disposed of. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. August 04, 2010 (bhupender/priti)