1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WP/8202/2009 PRAKASH SHANKAR LASHKAR AND ORS ...PETITIONERS V/S THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ...RESPONDENTS ... Mr. D.S.Bagul, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr. P.M.Shah, Senior Counsel, for respondent No.2. Mr. S.K.Tambe, A.G.P., for respondent State. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & K.U. CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATE : 4th Dec., 2009. *** PER COURT : 1. The Counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent no.5, M.L.A., has declared a project of Safari Park, located in a Green Zone, in a portion of land which, according to petitioners, is owned by them. 2. The Learned Senior Counsel Mr. P.M.Shah, appearing for the respondent Municipal Council, submits that the Municipal Council is noway 2 concerned with any such project nor any land is subjected to acquisition for the said project. 3. In this situation, it would be a matter of dispute between two private parties. In case the petitioner is aggrieved - that a person is illegally encroaching upon the petitioners' land then the petitioners have effective statutory remedies to avail of. At this stage, we are not inclined to exercise our extraordinary writ jurisdiction. The Writ Petition stands disposed of. We have not expressed any opinion in respect of the merits of the petition. [K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.] [NARESH H.PATIL, J.] ... agp/wp8202-09