Aiiiit TjT.o'j-1 f'OTreT np r:FrT-TATTT;OAT?H AT RTT.ASPTTT? lll''LJ.l.l '"^/^J'U IV j- <^/1' ^'lill^'^.l 1 l>^VJi-^.J^ll ^~\. i U'lL-r^-^01 ^ JX PETmQNER WMT PETITION fS) No. 5859 of2009 Chovaram Chauhan. VERSUS State ofCKhattisgarh & Olhers. WMT PETmQN UNDER AR'HCLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ton'ble Shil Satish K. Aairihotri, J. Present: Shri S.P.Kale. Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawver for the State' Passed on 09th dav of October. 2009) 1 fr,^ »!-< Uearci ieamed counsei tor the partaes. 1. Learaed counsel appearing fbr the petitioner submits tliat tlie instant oetition is squarelv covered bv the decision of this Coui't reiidered in Snst. A.Lall v. State qf Chhattisgarh & Others', tlws the petitioner iiiay be peiTnitted to make a representation to decide his case in tlie 1ight of aforestated decision. subiect to verification asto whether the respondeiit No. 3-Institute is a Govenmient Aided school and tlie petitioner is a teacher vvithin the sanctioned sti-ength. 2. Leamed counse! appearing for the State submits taat in the evect, the petitioner makes a representation, the sarae will 'oe considered aiid decided, in accordance with law, witliia a period of four weeks from the date of recerpt oftlie representaton. 3. Ii'. vie.w of foregoing, accordine to the leairied couiisel appearing for the pstitioner, nothing sumve.s in tSiis petition for adjudication. 4. Accordiaely, the writ petition is disposed of. 1 SdA Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 2UU7 i 1) bLJ 2&;?