IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 5TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 14TH KARTHIKA 1931 WA.No. 2463 of 2009() --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN WPC.28532/2009 dated 29.10.09 APPELLANT(S): 6TH RESPONDENT IN WPC K.V.CICILY, W/O. K.C.DOMINIC, AGED 56 YEARS, BRANCH MANAGER, THE KADUTHURUTHY URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.K.399, MANVETTAM BRANCH. BY ADV. SMT.A.SREEKALA RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 1 TO 5 IN W.P.(C) 1. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE KADUTHURUTHY URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.K.399, KADUTHURUTHY.P.O., KADUTHURUTHY REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, U.P.CHACKAPPAN AGED 61, S/O. LATE PAILY. 3. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES(G), KOTTAYAM. 4. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES(G) VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM. 5. RAJU M.C., AGED 46 YEARS, S/O. LATE JAMES, BRANCH MANAGER, KADUTHURUTHY MAIN BRANCH, THE KADUTHURUTHY URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. 6. E.D.PRAKASHAN, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O. LATE DIVAKARAN, BRANCH MANAGER, PERUVA BRANCH, THE KADUTHURUTHY URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. SENIOR GOVT.PLEADER SRI.BENNY GERVASIS-R1 THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ. --------------------------------------------- W.A.NO.2463 OF 2009 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of November, 2009 JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph, J. 6th respondent is the appellant in the Writ Petition. The appellant is aggrieved by an interim order dated 29.10.2009 passed by the learned Single Judge. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is the senior most person to be appointed. According to the appellant, going by the spirit of the interim order, the appellant should have been entrusted with the charge of the office of the General Manager, being the senior most. Further, it is submitted that charge has now been handed over to the junior. If that be so, it is certainly be open to the petitioner to move the learned Single Judge for appropriate orders in modification/clarification/variation of the order and for consequential relief. Therefore, without expressing anything as to the merits of contentions taken by the parties, we dispose of the Writ Appeal relegating the appellant to move the learned Single Judge for appropriate orders. (KURIAN JOSEPH) JUDGE (C.T. RAVIKUMAR) JUDGE spc W.P.(C) NO. 2