Ul Petition No. 19 of ititi State of Chhattlsaarh. throush Divisional Forest Officer (Generai), Forest Division, Rajnandgaon, CG, ^) Tesuram Nishad (Aduit), Son of Ramprasad, Resident of Village Arjuni, Dist. Rajnandgaon, CG. Presiding Officer, Labour C-ourt, Rajnandgaon, CG. tWrit Petition under Articie 226/227 of Constitution of India) ton'faie t. Aniu Ahuii petitioner/State. DeDuty Govt. Advocate for 'assed on 24th Aprii, 2007) The petitioner is aaflrieved bv the award dats •^-< A ^;n^, ^'t-4-AUU' (Annexure P/1) passed by the Labour Court in Case No. 1/iD Act-R- 2000. The respondent No.1 was an empioyee working since 1-4-1986 as Watchman. The sen/ices of t'ne respondent No.1 was retrsnchsd by order dated 1-7-1997, without following the provisions of iaw as enshrined in Section 25-F ofthe industrial Dispute Act, 1947. 2. The Labour court after havlng examined ths case came to the conciusion that the employee - respondent No.1 has worked for more than 240 days in the D-'eceding calendar vear and even eariier. ii was further heid that the resDondent No.1 was nelther paid rstrenchrnent ulowance nor one month's salan/ In lieu of notice before the imouaned 7. <^r: •y^. order of retrenchment dated 1-7-1997 was passed. In view of that, the !abour Court vide award dated 21-4-2001 ailowsd the appiication filed 'oy respondent No.1 v/ith a direction to reinstate the respondent No.1 with 50 % back wages. This award was oassed in the vear 2001. The app'ication for Interim reiief was rejected. The pet'iiioner must have cornplied with t'ne av/ard dated 21-4-2001 (Annexure P/1) by this sime. Even otherwise, there is no merit in this case. 3. It is weli settied principle of Saw that this Court, v/hite exercising its jurlsdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of india, has iimited jurisdiction to th®extent of reviewing the case in the event, there is pen/ersity or irreguiarity in t'ne process of decision, noi in the dscision itself. 4. In view of' the foregoing, the petition deserves to be and is dismissed accordingiy. No order as to c.ost^- — - Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Raiu