1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO.7442 OF 2005. WRIT PETITION NO.7442 OF 2005. WRIT PETITION NO.7442 OF 2005. Krishnaji Ramchandra Chinchalikar & ors. : Petitioners versus State of Maharashtra & ors. : Respondents. Mr.G.S.Godbole for the petitioners. Mr.C.R.Sonawane for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr.N.V.Walawalkar for Respondent No.4. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & NARESH H. PATIL, JJ. NARESH H. PATIL, JJ. NARESH H. PATIL, JJ. DATED : September 05, 2006. DATED : September 05, 2006. DATED : September 05, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The learned counsel for the respective parties agree that an agreement has been signed between the petitioners and the respondents-State authorities. We are further informed that the said agreement is likely to be registered very soon and once the agreement is registered, the petitioners will submit amended lay-out plan to the Respondent Nos.2 and 4 for fresh consideration and approval. 2 2 2 2. We, therefore, dispose of this petition by directing the petitioners to submit the amended lay-out plan within a period of four weeks from today to Respondent Nos. 2 and 4 and, the Respondent Nos.2 and 4, in turn, shall take appropriate steps as per law and pass orders as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of one month of the submission of the lay-out plan. Copy of the proposed lay-out plan is placed on record. The ad-interim order passed by this Court shall be effective till the final order on the fresh lay-out plan is passed. [NARESH H. PATIL, J] [NARESH H. PATIL, J] [NARESH H. PATIL, J] [B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.] [B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.] [B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.]