HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1563(MS) of 2009 Shakuntala Devi Educational Institute. Raipur Road, Dehradun. ...Petitioner. Versus Northern Regional Committee (NRC), National Council of Teachers Education, (North Region), A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur Service, Through its Regional Director. …Respondents Mr. Rajendra Tamta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Singh, Advocate for respondent. Dated: October 12, 2009: Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. By means of this petition the petitioner has challenged the order dated 22.08.2009 passed by the respondent whereby file of the petitioner Institution for grand of recognition for running B.P.Ed. Course was closed. The impugned order dated 22.08.2009 was passed on the following four grounds. i. CLU is not submitted, ii. Land documents has not been submitted, iii. Approved building plan has not been submitted, iv. FDRs of Rs. 5 lacs and Rs. 3 lacs are not submitted. 2. On 16.09.2009 this Court granted three weeks time to the respondent for filing counter affidavit but no counter affidavit has been filed till date. 3. The petitioner filed Civil Misc. application no. 8708 of 2009 supported with an affidavit and in paragraph-5 of the accompanying affidavit it is submitted that after filing of instant petition, the petitioner Institution has removed all the discrepancies raised by the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that since the petitioner 2 Institution has removed all the discrepancies raised by the respondents, his representation may be decided and his case may be reconsidered for grant of recognition for B.P. Ed. Course. 4. The prayer being innocuous is unopposed. In view of the above circumstances, it is directed that in case the petitioner Institution has already removed all the discrepancies as raised by the respondent, the respondent shall reconsider and decide his application dated 17.09.2009 within a period of one month from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. 5. With these directions, the writ petition is finally disposed of. No order as to costs. (V.K. Bist, J.) 12.10.2009 NCM: