WP(C) 3535/2008 BEFORE HON’BLE TMR JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Mr MU Mahmud, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr S. Chakra borty, learned Standing counsel, Gauhati University. The petitioner, a student of Final Year LL.B. Course of the University L aw College is before this Court being aggrieved by what she perceives to be un derevaluation of her performance in the IV th paper thereof, praying for an appropriate writ and/or direction to have the said paper reassessed by an exper t. Mr Mahmud while reiterating the above has submitted that as this is the las t chance of the petitioner to pass the said course , considering her past perfo rmance in the earlier examinations, the relief as sought for may be granted in t he interest of justice. Mr Chakraborty in reply , has urged that as the petitioner has not appro ached the University and has come to this Court directly , at this stage no judicial intervention is called for. He submits that if an appropriate applica tion is filed before the concerned authority of the University, the same would b e attended to in terms of the Regulations in force. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the nat ure of the grievance made in the instant petition, I am inclined to accept the s tand taken on behalf of the University. As a set of Regulations exist which prov ide for such an eventuality as in the instant case, it would be expedient for th e petitioner if so advised ,to approach the concerned authorities of the Univers ity for redressal of her grievance. In that view of the matter, the petition stands disposed leaving the pet itioner at liberty to file an appropriate application before the concerned autho rity of the University. If such an application is filed and necessary formalitie s in accordance with the extant Regulations are complied with, the same would be attended to in accordance with law. No costs.