:1: IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 3014 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 3014 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 3014 OF 2006 Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. ... Petitioner. V/s. Jayprakash M. Kokate ... Respondent. .... Mr.P.K. Rele, Sr.Counsel with Mr. Rajesh P. Rele.and Mr. Vinod Tayade wit Piyush Shah for the Petitioner. Mr.J.P. Cama with Mr. K.P. Anilkumar for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J. : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J. : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J. 20TH 20TH 20TH DECEMBER, 2006. DECEMBER, 2006. DECEMBER, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. At the hearing of the Petition, Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and for the Respondent had discussed the matter with a view to explore the possibility of an amicable solution to the dispute. Accordingly, the Court has been informed after due deliberation amongst the parties that the Petitioner shall pay to the Respondent within a period of four weeks the total sum of Rs.23.00 lacs in lieu of all the claims, demands and outstandings of the Respondent. :2: 2. In the circumstances, by consent the award of the Labour Court dated 2nd May 2006 in Reference (IDA) 575 of 1994 is quashed and set aside. There shall be an order by consent in the aforesaid terms. 3. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner states that the payment shall be effected within a period of four weeks from today. The Respondent shall be entitled to such spread over according to law in the tenure of the unemployment. 4. The Petition is accordingly disposed of since no other point has been pressed on either side on the merits of the case. ----