IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.40288 OF 2009 1. MAHESHWARI DEVI, WIFE OF KAILASH SINGH 2. SHARDA DEVI, WIFE OF RAM CHANDRA MAHTO 3. CHANDRAMA DEVI, WIFE OF SIKANDRA MAHTO 4. MANORAMA DEVI, WIFE OF RAMJEE MAHTO ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAMGARH, POLICE STATION DEHRI, DISTRICT ROHTAS AT SASARAM ……………………………………………………………………………….PETITIONERS VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR ******** 2 15/02/2010 The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 10.08.2009 passed by the Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram in Sessions Trial No. 271 of 2005 whereby the Court below has refused to discharge the petitioners for offences under Sections 364A, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The allegations against these petitioners who are ladies are that they watched over the kidnapped boy as per the statement made under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Considering this aspect of the allegation, it cannot be said at this stage that the petitioners should be discharged under the aforesaid sections. The involvement of the petitioners in this case has to be judged in a full fledge trial. I find no illegality in the impugned order. This application is accordingly dismissed. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)