WIRE AT PARTY’S COSTS TO 1. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA, MACHILIPATNAM. 2. THE SUB-COLLECTOR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURAL MARKETING, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE ESTATE OFFICER, RYTHUBAZAR, SWARAJ MAIDAN, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. BY ORDER OF HIGH COURT DATED 9-2-2010 IN W.P.NO. 2463 OF 2010 FILED BY THE PETITIONERS VIZ. 1. ABBURI VENKATESWARA RAO, 2. YENAMAL ANJAIAH, 3. GORESAPUDI LAKSHMI, 4. TALLURI SAMUEL, 5. SALIKITY VAIKUNTA RAO – WHILE DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, THIS COURT IS NOT INCLINED TO GO INTO THE FACTUAL CONTROVERSY BE THAT AS IT MAY, IT IS STATED THAT THE PETITIONERS WERE NOT GIVEN ANY OPPORTUNITY BEFORE TAKING SUCH ACTION. IN THE LIGHT OF THE SAME, THIS COURT IS OF THE CONSIDERED OPINION THAT THE WRIT PETITION BE DISPOSED OF DIRECTING RESPONDENT NO.1 TO PUT THE PETITIONERS ON NOTICE, AFFORD OPPORTUNITY TO EXPLAIN THEIR STAND IN THIS REGARD, CONSIDERED THEIR OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW, AFTER CONSIDERING SUCH OBJECTIONS WHICH MAY BE FILED BY THE PETITIONERS TILL APPROPRIATE DECISION, AS DIRECTED BY THIS COURT, IS TAKEN BY RESPONDENT NO.1, THE ORDER UNDER CHALLENGE IS BE HEREBY SUSPENDED-ORDER FOLLOWS HIGH COURT W.P.NO. 2463 OF 2010 For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR