1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5687 /2010 (Govinda Tikar vs. Returning Officer and others ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 3 rd DECEMBER, 2010. Heard. The Returning officer has produced the application submitted by the petitioner at the time of scrutiny. That application does not raise any objection to nomination paper of respondent no.2 on the ground that his nomination paper was not accompanied by requisite caste certificate. Before this Court Advocate Kshrisagar has tried to show that respondent no.3 has a fabricated story of loss of original and is using the caste certificate issued to Khandu Ganpat Khadpe in very same case by the Executive Magistrate. He has tried to compare photostat copies produced before this Court for that purpose. Advocate Patil for respondent No.1, learned AGP Mr A.S.Sonare for respondent no.2 and Advocate Bhide for Respondent no.3 have supported the impugned order. They contend that relevant objection was not raised before the Returning Officer and for the first time a question which is disputed, is sought to be raised in this Court in writ jurisdiction. 2 It is apparent that question requiring factual investigation is being raised before this Court. Though respondent no.3 states that he has no original of the caste certificate filed by him along with his nomination paper, that by itself, is not decisive. Hence leaving all contentions of petitioner in the petition open, the present petition is disposed of. The petitioner is at liberty to invoke appropriate jurisdiction in this respect. No costs. JUDGE sahare.