IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 1ST MARCH 2011 / 10TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 6471 of 2011(H) ------------------------ PETITIONER : --------------------- MANAGER, S.V.H.SCHOOL, ERUTHENPATHY, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI. U. BALAGANGADHARAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 695 001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 695 001. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PALAKKAD. 678 001. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PALAKKAD. 678 001. R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 6471 of 2011-H - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 1st day of March, 2011. JUDGMENT The petitioner is the Manager of a school. One Smt. Bhanumathy G. was appointed as H.S.A. Tamil from 2.6.2008 against the retirement vacancy of one Smt. Thilagavathy, H.S.A. Tamil, as per Ext.P1. By Ext.P2, the approval was rejected by the fourth respondent stating that the petitioner has not accommodated any protected teacher in the school. Since the appeals filed before the District Educational Officer and the Deputy Director of Education have been dismissed, the petitioner has filed a revision petition before the first respondent Government as per Ext.P4. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that he has complied with the statutory prescriptions, by appointing one protected teacher, but she left the school later. It is a matter for the appropriate authority to take a decision. 3. Therefore, there will be a direction to the first respondent to take a decision on Ext.P4 revision petition after hearing the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. 4. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. The petitioner wpc 6471/2011 2 will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the first respondent for compliance. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/