IN THE HIGH COUR T OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35154 of 2010 Binod Chaudhary Versus State Of Bihar ----------- 05. 29.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. In the F.I.R. suspicion is cast about killing by this petitioner also. Some of the Paragraphs are referred on behalf of learned A.P.P. that when informant came his house from his shop this petitioner along with Raju and deceased were there and went in his house, spot of blood was also seen, but all by the family members of the informant only. According to the learned counsel for petitioner, if, there would have been any reality about remaining of this petitioner along with his brother and deceased last seen at the shop that should be mentioned in the F.I.R.. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that there is political rivalry in between the parties and there is chance of false implication in the F.I.R., co-accused Raju Chaudhary having allegation for giving threatening also, is allowed bail by another Bench of this court vide Cr. Misc. No.29838 of 2010 though in regular side. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of 2 receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram, Rohtas in connection with Nokha P. S. Case No.58 of 2010, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P. C. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)