IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18008 of 2010 SATISH KUMAR @ CHANTU Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 24.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Matter relates to running of a wine shop in partnership of three persons. Licence was issued in name of petitioner but according to deed (agreement) money was to be deposited in account of third partner Gorakh Nath Singh. Moreover it is submitted that it is a case of bouncing and not of criminal liability and in any case, petitioner’s refusal for anticipatory bail is not justified though it is opposed but discussed circumstance, entitles petitioner for anticipatory bail. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Sasaram in Complaint Case No. 449 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)