IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 7TH APRIL 2009 / 17TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 11621 of 2009(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.F. NOUSHAD, GENERAL SECRETRY, PEOPLE'S MOVEMENT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS, (REGISTERED NO.A/8/2001), PAVUKKARA P.O., MANNAR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.VINOD J.DEV SRI.PRAMOD J.DEV RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, STATE SECRETRIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SECRETARY,VENMANI GRAMA PANCHAYAT, VENMANI, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VENMANI, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 5. KARTHIAYANI AMMA, VETTIYIL HOUSE, VENMANI VILLAGE,CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. MS.M.R.SREELATHA, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.11621 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 7th day of April, 2009 J U D G M E N T Allegation in the writ petition is that the 5th respondent has annexed a portion of the puramboke property lying adjacent to the property in her possession. Raising this allegation, it is stated that the petitioner has filed Ext.P4 before the 2nd respondent and it is complained that action thereon has not been taken. 2. Taking into account this grievance in the writ petition and without expressing anything on the merits, it is directed that if Ext.P4 has been received and is pending, the 2nd respondent shall take necessary action thereon, which shall be only with notice to the 5th respondent also. 3. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg