IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32766 of 2008 AFSANA KHATUN Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 4. 26.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The present application has been filed for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to opposite party No.2 by order dated 26.2.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No.481 of 2008. The main plea taken by the petitioner is that the so- called Talakanama and giving of Talak are all manufactured stories and were never sent nor received by the petitioner and only by making false story on the basis of false documents and misleading statements, the anticipatory bail has been obtained by opposite party No.2. On perusing the anticipatory bail application filed earlier, the Court finds that a clear statement has been made that the Talaknama prepared in front of the Notary Public, Nawadah has been sent to the opposite party –complainant through registered post and a copy of the registration receipt issued by the Post Office is also annexed therein. The said registration receipt shows that it has been issued on 13.9.2006 by the Post Office concerned and thus it cannot be stated that the statements made in the earlier anticipatory bail application are false. The claim of the petitioner is that she never received such letter/documents sent by registered post. In my opinion the claim of non- receipt of the said documents by the petitioner can have no relevance so far as the issue of cancellation of anticipatory bail granted earlier is concerned. 2 No case is made out by the petitioner for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted earlier to opposite party No.2 according to well-settled principle in this regard. The application is, accordingly, dismissed. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.)