IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 709 OF 2003 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 709 OF 2003 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 709 OF 2003 WITH WITH WITH REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO. 23594 OF 2002 REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO. 23594 OF 2002 REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO. 23594 OF 2002 IN IN IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 307 OF 1998. SECOND APPEAL NO. 307 OF 1998. SECOND APPEAL NO. 307 OF 1998. Narayan Laxman Dakare. ... Applicant/ Rev.Petitioner. V/s. Raghunath Shamrao Mohite and others. ... Respondents. M.R.Suryawanshi for applicant/review petitioner. R.S.Apte with A.A.Garge for the respondents. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 14th September 2006. DATED: 14th September 2006. DATED: 14th September 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard. 2. By consent of parties, delay is condoned. Civil application for condonation of delay is allowed with no order as to costs. 3. The registry is directed to register review petition. By consent of parties review petition is taken on record for final hearing and disposal. 4. Heard learned counsel for the rival parties. 5. Having perused review petition and the order dated 9th October, 2001, which is sought to be reviewed, no case is made out to review the order in question. Review petition is, thus, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)