IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PIL PIL PIL WRIT PETITION NO. 112 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 112 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 112 OF 2006 Asit C. Mehta ] .. Petitioner Versus Union of India & Anr. ] .. Respondents Mr. M.L. Sharma for the petitioner. CORAM: R.M. LODHA & NARESH H. PATIL, JJ. DATED: 03RD AUGUST, 2006 P.C. : . This is classic case of abuse of process of Court at the instance of a public limited company espousing the cause of sub-brokers whose list is given in paragraph 10. Almost all these sub-brokers are also public/private limited companies or partnership firms. Public Interest Litigation is not meant for espousing the cause of such sub-brokers by public limited company. 2. Writ Petition (PIL) does not deserve to be entertained. Dismissed in limine. Sd/- [R.M. [R.M. [R.M. LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] Sd/- : 2 : [NARESH [NARESH [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] H. PATIL, J.] H. PATIL, J.]