IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS TUESDAY, THE 12TH APRIL 2011 / 22ND CHAITHRA 1933 OP (FC).No. 1524 of 2011(R) ------------------------------------- OP.1200/2010 of FAMILY COURT,KOLLAM .................... PETITIONER (S): ----------------------- PAUL BENCHAMIN, AGED 37 YEARS, KADAPURATHU VEEDU, KATITHURA MURI, CHAVARA VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPALLY TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.N.SUNIL JOSEPH RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. HELAN PAUL, THOPPIL KOCHU VEETIL, NEENDAKARA VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPALLY TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-690518. 2. MANU (MINOR), AGED 10 YEARS, THOPPIL KOCHU VEETIL, NEENDAKARA VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPALLY TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY MOTHER AND IST PETITIONER, HELAN PAUL, THOPPIL KOCHU VEETIL, NEENDAKARA VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPALLY TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-690518. 3. SACHIN (MINOR), AGED 3 YEARS, THOPPIL KOCHU VEETIL, NEENDAKARA VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPALLY TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY MOTHER AND IST PETITIONER, HELAN PAUL, THOPPIL KOCHU VEETIL, NEENDAKARA VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPALLY TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-690518. 4. THE PRESIDENT, IRE LOADING UNLOADING WORKERS WELFARE FORUM, Q.657/88, CHAVARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-690518. THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/04/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------ O.P.(FC) No.1524 of 2011-R ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 12th day of April, 2011 J U D G M E N T K.M.Joseph, J. The prayer in the original petition is to take a decision on Ext.P2. Ext.P2 is an application filed by respondents 1 to 3 who are the wife and children of the petitioner seeking interim direction to the 4th respondent not to disburse arrears of salary. Ext.P3 is the order passed by the Family Court, Kollam therein. Petitioner filed Ext.P4 objection. It is stated to have been filed on 18.11.2010 and the matter has not been disposed of. According to the petitioner, Ext.P2 is not maintainable in view of the provisions in Section 60 (1) (h) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. (2). Without expressing any view on the merits of the petitioner's case, we dispose of the Original Petition by directing the Family Court, Kollam to take a decision on Ext.P2 without delay. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. (M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS) JUDGE. MS