1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 969 of 1983 The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay .. Plaintiff versus Takma Machinery Mfg. Co.Pvt.Ltd.. Defendant Mr.A.V. Fegade i/b Mulla & Mulla for the plaintiff. None for Deft CORAM CORAM CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J : D.G. KARNIK, J : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED DATED DATED : 1st July 2005. : 1st July 2005. : 1st July 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. None present for the defendant. Suit is filed for recovery of money. Despite service of the writ of summons, the written statement has not been filed for a period of more than 20 years. 2. Suit of the plaintiff is decreed under Order 8 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure in terms of prayer clause (a) of the plaint. D.G.KARNIK, J