91 O CWP No8583 of2009 e 1e S 1nthe Court ofPuno andHaryana at Dateofdecision0804 2010 1 CWP N8583 of2009 SamritiSharmaand others Petitioners Vs 0 GuruNanak Dev University aild another 0 2 CWP 9218 of2009 CA3 I JugrajSingh Petitioner C5 VS I GuruNanak Dev andothers Z m 3CWP No11867 of2009 tr I NaveenSingh Pctitioner 08 Vs GuruNanak Dcv UniversityAmrsat CO andanother 3 72 4 CWP N9277 of2009 14 Silngh ePctiti01101 VS GuruNanak Dev andanother 5CWP No13363 of2009 C RitllpiKumari Pctitioner VS GuruNanalcDev andanother Resndellts e 6CWP N09339 of2009 SahasChopra and another Petiti oners VSe Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 92 4 CWP N8583 of2009 2 Guru Nanak Dev andanother 7 CWP N09351 of2009 RajivKumal andothers Petitioloers VSe Guru Nanak Dev andanother 1 8CWP No487 of2009 0 Singhatld others PetitioneFS 0 VS GuruNanak Dev C5 andanother I 9 CWP No340 of2009 Z SinghAulakh andothers Petitoioners VS tr Guru Nanak Dev I and another 06 10CWP No10490 of2009 CCl c 47 Virdi andothers Petitioners n 4 VS Guru Nanak Dev 11e and another l l CWP Nc9770 of2009 Singhand others Petoitioners e VS Guru Nanak Dev andanother 12 CWP 9492of2009 Ashish Luna alndothers Petitioners VS Guru Nalak Dcv andanother Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 93 0 4 CWP No8583 of2009 3e 13 CWPN08153 of2009 Kaur andothers Petitioners VS Guru Nanak Dev andailother 14CWP No779 of2009 1 Kumar andanother Pctitioners Q VS Guru Nanak Dev 0 andanother 0 I 15 CWP N8514 of2009 C5 Dhir etitioner Vs Z Guru Nanak Dev andallother m 16 CWP No0038 of2009 olj Jatin Setll Petitioner VS OQ C GuruNanak Dev a andanother 21 17 CWPNo9888 of2009 0 Rahul Sharmaand others Petitioners VS Guru Nailak Dev andothers Cee 18 CWP No9644 of2009 SiddharthAcharyaandothers ePetitoioners VSe Guru Nanak Dev andanother 19 CWPNo9411 of2009 ArnritpalSinghand others Petitioners Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 94 1 9 CWPN8583 of2009 4e VersuS Guru Nwlak Dev Amritsar andanother CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE PERMOD KOIlLJ Preseont1 lVlrNeneet Sharma MrAS Mlnaise Mr Naresh m Prabhakar Mr RS Mallhas M1SK RaUatl M4anuj Ngrath Advoc8tes for the 0 MlDS Patwalia Advocatefor the 0 I PERMOD KOHLI J C5 All these petitionsare beingdisposedof by this 4 Z COlTllllOll order as the facts and of law Ill all these 0 petitionsare identical Z All the in these are the studentsof 08 ClO COUrse Iike Bachelor of mputer r 7 Science and Bachelor of Architecture Degtee Il in the Faculties of AppliedSciences and and PhysicalPlanning and Architecture Theywere adInittedto the course in theyear 2005 At the relevanttilne they C Were governedby the Ordinances franled by the Universityfor PronlotlOllfTOlll One semester to anothersemesler The cligibility conditions were 111 para 8 of the Appendixof Ordinances for Under Graduate BTechlB Arch Degree in the Faculties of Applied Ce and PhysicalPlanningand Architecture Ordinance Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 95 ri 4 CWP No8583 of2009 Sm dated 15 1000 ln operationat the time of the admission lS hereunder 8 a1 A candidateshall be promoted to thc next higherselnester providedhe SCCUresat Icast40Io 1 lllarks Ill of all the courses takn 0 together for thatsemester even ifhe fails lll One or 0 more coursels I C b examinations for an odd seInester I shall be conducted alongwith 1he next odd Z seinestoer and an eveil semester alongwith the next m tr even semester r r 01j C 9 An extra chanceshallbe givento a reappeor LO C n candidate of seventh semester 13TecllI9th W n S mo Semester 3 Archlalongwith the 0 end seinester examinationprovidedthe candidate has passedall the courses uptoo setnester C dl A end semester exainination shall be conducted only for eighth 3ecllIl tenth 03 Arcl semesterprovidedthe candidate has passedall the courses upto seventlllninth semester Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 96 1 CWPNc8583 of2009 nw6 e9Award of grace marks for these examinatlollS shall be as per the Ordinances Under Clause ofthe Ordinance a candidatewas entitledto be to the next higher semester if he securcs 1 at Ieast40Io marks lll of all courses takentogether for Q that semester ifhe fails in one or more courses Under Clause 0l 0 0 for an odd semestershall be conductedalong rcappear C5 with the next oddsemester and even semesteralongwith the ncxt I even semester Under Clause an ex1rachance is to a Z reappearcandidateof 7 semester 6BTech 9 semester 3 m 1 ArchI with 8 and 10 semester a candidatehas all courses uptoG and eighthsemestcrs 08 rlO under Clause 6d9a supplemenryexanlination is to be n7 c2 for 8 03Tech9andtenth68rch semesters D al1 the courses upto seventhlninth the candidate has selnesterThere is alsoa provisionfor awardof gracemarks as perthe UniversityOrdinallces The Universityamended the t aforesaid The Universityhas introducedthe carry Oll systemlll tlleyear 1999for various underthe Calendar1999 Vol III for variouscourses exceptIaw and Technol7 facultiesand School of 50ci3l Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 97 1 4 CWP No8583 of2009 m Sciences In respectto the course having8 seincsterdurati010 following conditionshavebeen laid down 3 Courses havingeightsemestcr duratlolln a1There shall be no condition for proinOtillga studentfroin first semester to second semester 1 b9However a studen shall be pronlotedlootllircl r semester only if he has passedatleast 500Io 0 C of the first two semeslers but there I will be no conditionlforprolnoting a studcntfrolll C5 I third semester to fourth semester Z C 9However a studentshall be promoted to flAlh m semester Ollly if he has passedatleost 50 C ofthe flrst four semestcr I 06 d1There wiil be IlO condition for a rQ studentfromflAh to sixth seinester 4r e e9 However a student shall be pronlotedto n seventh semester only if he has passcclall the ofthe flrsttwo semesters 0 The student shall be promotedto eighth seinester only if he has passedall the ofthe first tllree senlesters AAer a periodof eighthsemestersthe student shall be givena periodof two consecutive years more to pass failingwhich he shall haveto start tllc course afresh from the 6rst semester llowever such a Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 98 We CWP No4583 of2009 e8 studentwill not be to qualifythe entrance test agaln ll The aforesaidOrdinances ny on systeml was further amendedbythe 111lts meeting held on 13122006 IIl thefollowing Inanner 1 Presentlleaditll ProloosedHeading tr ii CarryOll Systeinfor variousiil CarryOll for various 0 semester examinations exceptlaw semester examinatlollS 6exceptLaw 0 Iand and Faculties and School of Sociall Faculties and School of Social Sciences I C5 I Vide the amendment the cany Oll systemfor vanous 4 Z semesterex1uninationswas made to tlle tr andTechnology Faculties as well exceptLaw and School of Social 1c Sciences However the amendmentwas appliedfrom Session c tll 20072008 llhe Universityfurtherintroducedthe ametldmeilt lll r n7 the cany on systemof B Tech M Tech IvICA and MBA 5 1 07 fl years course vide its decision dated 18 2 008 the carry Oll system was applied 111all the exceptLaw and Schoolof Social Sciencesfor which thereare separateOrdinances e Vide the aforesaid decision the carry Oll system was made to the Computer Sciencec and Electronic by wayof further clariflcation of the amendment introducedvide Item Nol3 111theineetingof the held on 05122006 The are of the decision dated Ol082008 the amendedOrdinancesGoverning the cany Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 99 C V0 CWPN08583 of2009 e9 on systemhas been appliedto all the coursesrefened to hereminaboveAs a consequenceofthc of calTy on systema studentcan be from first semester to second semester without any condition Hwever such a studentCall be to third semester if he has passedat least 50 per cent 1 of the First two semesters For to 4 0 semester no condition lS applicableAgainfoi pronlotlOllto 0 I semester a studentmust pass at least50 per cenli of C9 I the first four semesters Againfor lrom 5 to 6 Z semcster ls Witllout any condition For to 7thsemester a Q further embargolS crealted that the student nu st pass all ee ofthe flrst two eL semesters for otj cQ to 8 semesters a studentmust quafy all the ofthe 4 47 firstothree thereby a student will not be 2 0 n eligibleto seekadmission in 7 semester ifhe hasany reappearor backlogof first two selnesters Same eligibility condition wil applyfor to 8 semester and if te stuclcnt has a reappearOl backlogof first threesemesters he is inelgibleto seek admisslOll1118 semester The grievance of the lS that the anlendment inUoduced or the clarification issuedvide order datedOl 082008 IS illegaland lll cases of the With a view to supporttheir contention reliance is pIacedon the Ordinance Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 400 r CWP No8583 of2009 10e dated 14112000 Pml which was 111force at thetilne of amission which onlyrequired 40 per cent aggregatc marksof all the papers ln a selnester of the fact whether a studentfails ln one or more papersof that semesters I is further contended that carry Oll wlch was introduccd in the 1 C Calendar 1999 Vol II has no 10 the 0 and Technology Faculties Law and School of Social C I Sciencesas 1S evidentOom Annexure I3 13venthe atnendlnent C5 introducedpursuantto the decision of the vide I1em Z No3 lIl the held on 5 122006 cany on systemfor the m r1 of and Faculties has been r from Session20072008 It is subnted that 08 Ctl Slnce the were admitted 111 the year 2005 this e 7 amendmentis agalll not to the halingbeen 2 made froln Scssion 20072008 as per tlle 0 contained in the amendmentOrdinances itsclf It lS furthercontendedthat vide orderdatedOl 082008 lnnexure PI herein the amendmenthas beenapplied which has affected the career of the Accordingto the Ieamedcounsel for the had the known that theywould be requiredto clear all thc of first 213semesters tlleywould halve concentratedon tllose papers 011 Now after two years the Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 401 r CWPNo8583of2009 11 cannot be for 110thavingclearedthe paperstwo years back It oisthe case of the that the of the rules is when it takes away any of the rightof the hither to available 111 existingstatutellaw to the the only m for to the seven and eighthsemesters was 0 that a candidateshouldsecure 40 per cent marksin aggregatc m a 0 semester of the fact whethera candidatehas failed lll C5 I one or more ofthe papersofthat semester Z ln the oreplyflled by the the Unillersityhas relied upon the order dated Ol082008 whereby r t r carry on has beenapplied to all the courses otj 111 the UniversityexceptLaw and School of Social Sciences CQ 1 ee Thesetwo courses being by separateOrdinances It lS 2 reiteratedthat any having Ill Ll the flrst two semesters is ineligible for seekingadlnission to semester and a candidatehavingoreappearin flrst tllrec semesters lS to seekadlnission in 8 semester It is statcdthatas a matter of fact order datedOl 082008 1Snot an amendmentto the but onlybyway of clarification as previous Ordinances of 2000 were in this regardand thus necessitateda clarification It is mentionedin the replyfiled by the University that some of the who had ln reappear Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 402 Ol CWP No8583 of2009 12 f examinations on fi rst two semesters were admissionto 7 semester subject to clearanceofthe backelog ofthe first two semestersOll their filingof the affidavit tllat in the event of the failure of the candidateto clear the reappear of first two the admission to 7 semester could be cancelled m Similar affidavits were filed by the who 0 securedadmission Ill 8 semester while Ill flrst three 0 Itissubmitted thatallthe admissionsto 7and C5 8 semesters in respectto thecandidateswho had of first Z 213semesters Were 111natureand could be cancclledOll m their failureto clear the baclolog tr t 341 When these were flled interim orders were 08 by this Court in CWP No8583 of 2009 on 29052009 ltl 1 e entryin 8 semester Similar orderswere passed in other writpetitions the to seekadmissoionin 7 and l7 8 senlesters ancl also to appear Ill the examoinationsfr0111time to tlll MrOS Patwalia learned counsel for the G has however arguedthat neither the Ordoinances carrying on systemare in natUrC Ilor the order dated Ol 082008 can be construedto haIe His furer contentionis that the is entitled to changethe rules even duringthe continuance ofthe Course bya Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 403 vlC CWP No8583 of2009 en13 studentas the doesnot holda promise to a studentnot to change the duration or the manner Or metllod of proinotions from one semesters to anolher except the or a courseofstudyfor which a studentmaybe entitlcdto notice The have Fed reliance upoll a Single j Bench judgment ofthis Court reportedPawanKumar Sharma Vs 0 The State of Puniab and others 1991 Recent Services 0 I 407 In this case the C I byeIaws the condition of passingthe Z examinations lll a particularchance The students who are 2 the course at the tilne of introductionof the 1X I assailed the action of the the issue a 06 leaornedSingleBench ofthis Court held as follows Cll 1 7 It has beenlaid down in the aboverelfetored two 2 authoritiesthat the which aore O at thetime a studenttakesadInissionIll the consolidatedcourse would keepon applyiilg irrespective of any amendment till the studentSO admittedcompletes the course ln view of 1111S the were not justieclin tlpplying the whicll were on 16 August 1986 to the stidents who had got adinissioninthe BAMS course 111the first year prior to that date 35 Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 404 1 1 4 CWP No8583 of2009 1 4 Relance 1S also placedOll another Division Bencll of this Court in the case of Munish Kumar Talwar Vs The Vice Chancellor Baba Farid Universityof Health Sciences and others 2007 62LR 330 ln thIScase also the rulcs for BAMS course were amended The amendedrules 1 C admissionto flnal examlnatlOIl ifthere lll 0 the second examination The petitioner therein had 0 reppearm second though he was admissioll C I to third semester but not to appearin the examinations 0 Z This Court the held as under W 7 The short that requiresdetermination 0 lll this case is whether the is to be I 08 by the alnended or OO Ordinance The had been to eo Z in the 3 Professionalexaminationheld lll tl 2005 Ifthe original durationofthe 3 Professionalhad not been amendedthe hadcleared thereappearsof the2 Professional and on that account there was no imped imenl 4e before hiin to appear in the 8nal examinallon which was then to be held in NIember December2005 As per tlle he 1S suffering on account of the wrong of theamendedOrdinancein his case Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 405 tv CWPN85830f2009 15 9 Slncethe is to betreatedas belongingto batch of year 2000 as already noticedtheprovision ofpara11 above would also come to his rescue When the the course he was entitledto take that he would be eligible to clear lst and e 2 Professionalby 2005 0 He reallycould ilOt have any say 111flxlllgthe 0 I duration of the 3 by amendinentin C5 the Ordinanceafter he hadjoinedthe course To I sucha situationonly theprovision Z ofpara 11 of Ordinance provided that m candidatesadmittedpriorto 2001 will appear lll I final aftertwo yearsof studyIt Call 08 oo be noticedthat the hasstudiedwith the en7 batch ln 1 and 2 Professional exanlinatlOllSe Z Thus a cferent duration of the course if being tl to similarlysituatedcandidas We do notsay that it ainounts to discriminationbutparity needto be inaintainedbetween similarlysituated candidatesand that is what is soughtto be c achievedbyOrdinance above We are thusofthe view that unamcndedOrdinancewould governthecase ofthe appelant andtheprovisions of the amended Ordinance cannot be made to him 99 Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 406 V CWP No583 of2009 16 4 To the contrary Mr DS Patwalia learned counsel appeanngfor the has relied upoil PuniabUniversity Vs SubashChander and anotherl 98413 Court Cases 603 ln thiscasethe had securedadmissionto MBBS COurse lll the year 1965 The existing required 1 1 llllllllllUln of 50 per cent marksto pass in eachsubjectIn addition 0 to the above there was a rule for grantof goracenarks 0 I uptoOne of the total aggregate marksincluding marksfor C5 I Practicaland internalassessment if a candidatefails in one or more Z n theyear 1970 an amendmentwas madein the m rules and the award of grace marks was confined to total C 4t marks exciudingthe lnarks for intertlal assessment 06 Where a candidatefails ln one or more he has C1O 7 111all subjects where a separate of passing also exists In case of BAMSIBDS examination the Cle gracelnarks of one percentwas confinedto eachsubjectand not to aggregate of all subiects The petitioner who was a studentof MBBS was failing111one paperHe claimed grace marks on the basisofuramended rules but he was awardedgracemarkson the A basisof the amendedrules which did not prove beneficialto him He tbe same in the PunjabandHaryanaIlirh C4Iui1I Full Bench ofthis Court allowed thewrit pctl41r 1 rules at thc tintc i4 a1 1i 1 Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 407 Vl 1 1 CWP N8583 of2009 17 applyand the amendedrules cannot be applied to thedetrimentofthe candidates Honble the Court whe the 1SSUCheld as under 11 We do not agree with the IearnedJudgesofthc Full Bench ofthe IIighCourtthatthereis any clelnent of j 111 the changebroughtabout by the Ir additionof the to Rule 2 l of theCalendarfor 0 0 the year 1970 according to the Shorter C Oxford EnglishDictionaryThird Edition in relationto I Statutesetc means Operative with regard to pasttime Z The changebroughtabout by tlheacldhionof the m to Rule 2 does not say tllat it shall be lr r I with elYect from any earlier date It IS 08 obviously It is not possible to hold that it is QO 1 retrospecttve111 operationtnerelybccause though 2 Z introducedin 1970 it was applied to SubashChander m 1 who appeared for the flnal exalnination lll 1974 after he hadjoinedthe course ealrlieritl 1965 No promise was made or could be deemedto have becn made to him at the time of his admissiOlllll 1965that 4 there will be no alteration of the rule or regulation ltl regardto the percentageof marks requiredfor passing anyexamination or award of goracemarks and that the rules relating theretowhich were in forceat the time of his admission would continue to be appliedto hiin until he Onishedhiswholecourseeee0009 99 Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 408 1 CWPNc08583of2009 1 1 2 Therefore we are clearlyofthe opliliolltllat thereis 110 of the changein the rule inode in the year 1970 merclybecause it was in 1974to SubashCllanderwho lladjoined theMBBS coursein 1965when award of grace inarkswas different ln thesecircumstances W we afflrm the Vlew of D1C MallajanandPC Jain JJ 0 in the DivisionBench in Sewa Ram 0 I Ve University and tlle view taken C0 by the learnedJudgesofthe Full Bench in the decision I underappealin this case and hold thal the University Z rightin holding that SubashChander l was 0 4Cr was not entitledto 16 grace marksunder the old rule r but was entitledto only4 gracemal4csundcr thc ncw rule 08 CO and had therefore not passedtlle examination in 4 We allow the appea but withoutany order Z Howeverthis decision will 1101affect the as to costs a resultof the exainination of Subash Chander in if it hadbeendeclaredas per thedirecllonof thelearnedJudgesofthe Full Bencll in the LettersPatent 4 Appea 99 The aforesaid was followedbyanodlerBench of the SupremeCourt 111 the case of Puniab University ChaldarhVs DevianiChakrabartiand others 61984 3 CourtCases 612 whereinit has been held as follows Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 409 1 CWP No8583 of2009 9 ln the presentcase also the new dccisionsOre prlma facle in lllld theydid not become merelybecausethey applied to studentswllo hadalready started their educationalcareers We therefore 1 allow lhese appealsbut without any order as to C costs and set aside the of thc High 0 0 Court ancl doisinissthe writ petitionsHowever I this decisionwill not affectthe rightwhicll tnight C5 I have beeil grantedto the in tlhewnt Z petitions on the basis ofthe High Court which have beenreversedin theseappeals Il 1 Asimilar issue calne to be considered by a Division 08 Bench of ths Court 111the case of hul GuptaVs State of OO Harvana2000 49SCT 1099 whereinSubhashChanders case e Z suprahasbeenrelied uponand it has beenheld as under 0 4 We have heard learnedcouilsel for the parties and are of the view that there is no merit in the writ petitionsThe onlyargumentadvancedbythe counsel for the petitioner is tlhat when his client joinedthe diploina course lll the year 1997 tlle made it clear thatthe durationof that course was 3 yearsand the could not changethe dutation till the studentswho joined the course ln the academic session 199798 had Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 410 r CWP N8583 of2009 20 the same H has plucedrelianceon Full Bench of this Court in Ainardeep SinploSahotav StateofPuniabetc 1993 ll SLR 673 1993 SCT 328 Pe H 31 and SwaraniitSinahandanotherv StatcofPuniaband others 1998 21SLR 1411997 l41 SCT 511 P 8 Q Hl FB We are unable to agree wilh the 0 contentioll of the petitionerFrom the standtaken C I by the it lS clear that the coinpetent C5 I decidedin the year 1995 to revisethe curriculum of Electronics and Communication Z DiplomaCourse to 3eel12 years of 7 C senesters The 7 semester includesthe I 08 training and the lnarksawardedto a candidate111 CtO this training have to be includcd in thc diploma 4t e awarded to him It is further clear that the 2 Director Technical Education Haryanaby his tl communicationdated18101995 informed allthe Principals of theInstitutesin tlle Stateof HIana which impartsuch education that the duration of the course had been increased to 3112 years and that the revised curriculum was to be with effect from the academic session 199596 Hhat was that when the prospectuswas issued for the academic session 199798 therc was an inadvertent error therein and the duration Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 411 CWPN85830f2009 m21 1 of the course was shown to be of 3 years When this error was noticed the Dlrector Technical Education Haryanasent anotllercoinmunication to all the Principals of the Institutes impwting educationin Electronics ancl Communication Coursethat therevised curriculum was to m Lr be with e0ect froin the academic 0 sessloll 199586 This is not a case where the 0 I durationof the course was midestream C40 The duration of the course had