w HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR DIV}SION BENCH: HON’BLE SHRI DILIP RAGSAHEB DESHMUKH 85 HON’BLE SHRI RAJESHW$R LAL JHANWAR, JJ. Writ Appeal No. 23212009 APPELLANT Gaurav Shanna, son of Shri Lakhan Lal Petitioner Shanna, agsd about 25 years, resident of near Shiv Mandir, Subhas Nagar, Kasan'dih, Durg, l District Durg (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh thmugh 'the Secretaxy Law and Legal Deparément, Mantralay, D.K.S: Bhavan, GE. Road, Raipur (CG) 2. High Couxi of Chhattisgarh, through the Registrar General, High Court Road, Bilaspur (CG) Agneal under Section 2 Ciause [1] of the Chhattisggh High Court (gppeal to Division Bench) Act Rules 2006 Present: Shxi H.B. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Smt. Meera Jaiswal, Advocate for the appellant. Shn‘ Pravin Das, Dy‘ Govt. Advocate for the State. ORAL - ORDER (Passed on 20.08.2009) The following order of the Court was passed by Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. Heard on admission. 2. This writ appeal arises out of the order dated 21.4.2009 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition (S) No.463/ 2009, whereby the wn‘t petition was dismissed. 3. The appellant had appeared in. the preliminaxy examination conducted for selection on the post of Civil Judge Class—II on 15th May; 2008. He. obtained 85 marks add while cutoff marks in 26“ general categoxy wgre 86. It was contended by the appellant that queStion No.98 of the preliminaiy examination was out of the syllabus. The leanled Single Judge has considered this in para 4 83 5 of the impugned order. Obviously the question related to procedural law of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which was in the syllabus. The learned Single Judge rightly held that the petition had no merit and Was liable to be dismissed. 4. Accordingly, the wn't appeal has no mexit and is accordingly I Note‘:This case is to be argt dismissed at the stage of admission. Sdl- Sd/- R.L. Jhanwar Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh 3 Judge Judge l Accepted a Counsel for J7 I k if