IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: May 10, 2011 1. Civil Writ Petition No.981 of 2006 Ram Kumar & another .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . 2. Civil Writ Petition No.8903 of 2006 Bani Singh & another .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. H.N. Khanduja, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Saini, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondents. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) CWP No.981 of 2006 [2] 1. This shall dispose of Civil Writ Petition No.981 of 2006 titled ‘Ram Kumar & another vs. State of Haryana & others’ and Civil Writ Petition No.8903 of 2006 titled ‘Bani Singh & another vs. State of Haryana & others’ as common question of law and facts are involved. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, in both the cases, contends that the cases were part of a bunch of cases disposed of vide judgment dated 10.4.2008 rendered in Civil Writ Petition No.18601 of 2006 titled ‘Om Parkash & others vs. State of Haryana & others’. The cases somehow got detached. The cases are covered by the decision rendered by this Court in case of Om Parkash (supra). 3. Learned counsel for the respondent-State says that indeed the case of the petitioners is covered by judgment rendered in Om Parkash’s case (supra). 4. In view of the above, both the petitions are decided in terms of judgment dated 10.4.2008 rendered in Civil Writ Petition No.18601 of 2006 titled ‘Om Parkash & others vs. State of Haryana & others’. (AJAI LAMBA) May 10, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? CWP No.981 of 2006 [3]