1 Prem Raj Goyal Vs. Dr. Ramraj S.B.Civil Review Petition No. 09/2009 In S.B.Civil Revision Petition No.1338/2001 Dated:- 05/05/2010 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA Mr. J. Gehlot for the petitioner. 1. This review petition under Order XXXXVII Rule 1 Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) has been filed by the petitioner seeking review of order dated 25.09.2007 passed in Civil Revision Petition No.1338/01 whereby an order dated 8.11.2001 passed by the Additional District Judge No.2, Jodhpur in Civil Appeal No.26/97 reversing the order passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) No.6, Jodhpur in Civil Misc. Case No.73/95, has been set aside. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that while passing the order under review, various documents produced on behalf of the petitioner have not been considered by this Court and therefore, the order suffers from error apparent on the face of the record. Learned counsel submitted that Photograph Ex.3 placed on record was an admitted document and therefore, it was not required to be proved by producing any evidence. Learned counsel submitted that the statement of AW-2 Trilok Chand have also not been considered in its entirety by the Court while passing the order under review. 2 Accordingly, it is submitted by the learned counsel that the order under review deserves to be recalled and the revision petition deserves to be dismissed. 3. It is to be noticed that while passing the order under review, the statement of AW-2 Trilok Chand so also the photographs produced have been taken note of by this Court. If the finding arrived at by the Court after appreciation of the evidence on record is erroneous then it cannot be a ground for review of the order. The scope of the review is very limited. Unless any error on the face of the record is pointed out, the order cannot be reviewed, even if the parties are in position to satisfy the Court that order under review is an erroneous order. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the considered opinion that the order under review does not suffer from any error apparent on the face of the record so as to make the petitioner entitled to seek review of the order in terms of the provisions of Order XXXXVII Rule 1 CPC. 4. In the result, the review petition is dismissed. (SANGEET LODHA),J. rp/-