c- ,\.- 'T T T?' '^•S'-s1'^-^ .....K""'. IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^ WRITPETITION^S^-NO. 6(2- /2009 c^ PETITIONER / ' : " Mahadeo Prasad S/o. Gaya PLAINTIFF Ram Kesharwani, Caste : U\ ^,.^ 'c5v'Y,'r.^' ^-,^1 ^yyv ^''^'\/ t<f <^'.y Baniya, Occupation : Agricultural, aged about : 71 years, R/o. Kedia Chowk, Sonarpara, Sarangarh, Tahsil Sarangarh, District : Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS/ DEFENDANTS ^.^ .s"*^' /-l. Dilip Bai Wd/o. Late Aghori, Caste : Baniya, aged about : ' 80 years, Occupation : Housewife. / 2. Ram Bai D/o. Late Aghori, W/o. Shri Keshav Bani, Caste : Baniya, aged about : 55 years, Occupation Housewife, Both are R/o. of ^ Bhoghapara, Shivrinarayan, Tahsil : Navagarh, District : Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). Krishna Kumari D/o. Late Aghori, W/o. Deoprasad, Caste : Baniya, aged about : 50 years, Occupation : Housewife, R/o. Bazarpara, Shivrinarayan, Tahsil : Navagarh, District : Janjgir- Champa (C.G.). Krishna Bai D/o. Late Aghori, W/o. Devendra Bani, Caste : Baniya, aged about : 45 years, Occupation Housewife, R/o. Rajapara Bhatgaon, Tahsil : Bilaigarh, District : Raipur (C.G.). State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Collector, Raigarh, District : Raigarh (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA . ."TKfi - nQl-it-iQ-nar-_j?tama/-< Lkv^'u-ua_ ~ys( -^ww<i,'^tWTS, ^vfW^i ^p.c^-^) t^5 c,i ^M SBs_HOS'BI^ SHM JUSn@B MjK, AGIURW^ 13-5-2009 Stui P.K. Patel, Advocate, ^>r the petitioncr. Shri Sunil Sahu,;Advocat4 for the respondeats No. 1 to4. Sfari Ajay Dwwedi, Dy. Go^t. Adv. for fhe State. With the consent ofthc pajrties, tfae aiatter is heaid fiHaIty. Thc iastant pctition is d^rected against the order dated •6-1-2009 passed by the Cjourt of Civil Judgc Class II, Sarangarh, Distt. Ra^arh in whercby leamed tnal Coiul amendmcnt application filed b}( [CmlSiiitNo. 2-A/2007, |ias partly allowed the the plainttff/ petitioner hcreia aad disallowed thc pray^r of aaiendment sought by fhe petitioner in para 10 ofthje plaint. Shri Sahu, leamed coims^l fi>r the respondents No. 1 to 4, has no objection in allcwjdng tfais petition, but liis prayer is that a directiou may l}e given to dispose of the suit within a reasonable tune. With (he consent of fhe impugned order by which, thie a(acadment sought in para 10 of fhe plaint was disaUow^d, is set aside aud fhe amendmeat sou^tt in para 1Q The trial Court is directed t(j> permit tfae plaintiff / parties, the part of the of the plaiat is allowed. awfei ^•S«ipBneRKROTpira'—FS/95—1!/2008—1,00,000. W33&1 K^IpFB^^ miaiirogsiw d-a^ "41<41Cl^, ^TlTCTTO, iqMI-Hy L^ ^, afliy'ifi, T^rray ^^^HO- ^\ ^i'q^T(^ ^ipifepftt 'swRif if 'fe'zt <n<t;i< ^•stiwian^ petitioner herein to incorporate jthe amendment tiU 19-6- 2009. i It is also directed fhat the| by the tnal Court in accorda4ce wifh teff as early as possible preferably withm a perijsd ofsix monfhs fix>m fhe date ofproduction/ receipt ofa ^opy ofttus oidcr. With the aforesaid obs^rvatton, fhis petition is disposed of. suit shall be disposed of Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge