IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 9TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 20TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 2472 of 2009(T) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- V.D.VINOD, DRIVER - (UNDER SUSPENSION) OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (SOIL SURVEY), KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, KERALA GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR, AGRICULTURE (SOIL CONSERVATION) DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR,(SOIL SURVEY), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 36. GOVERNMENT PLEADER, ADV.SMT.ANU SIVARAMAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.2472/2009-T ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 9th day of February, 2009 J U D G M E N T All that the petitioner seeks for is to consider his representation Ext.P4 requesting for revocation of his suspension. 2. The petitioner is a driver working under the third respondent. He entered service on 15/09/2003 in the office of Assistant Director (Soil Survey), Kottayam. He is served with Ext.P1 memo seeking explanation on certain omissions and commissions. It is submitted by him that ultimately he had approached this Court by filing W.P.(C).No.30992/2007, W.P.(C). No.22347/2008 and W.P.(C).No.31635/2008 seeking various reliefs and copies of the judgments have been produced as Exts.P5 to P7. The order of suspension is issued thereafter as per Ext.P3, which according to him amounts to victimisation. 3. Ext.P4 is dated 17/01/2009. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that so far no action has been taken on the same. 4. Since the petitioner is seeking for revocation of the order of suspension, the first respondent will consider Ext.P4 in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The same may be done within two months from the date of W.P.(C) No.2472/2009 -:2:- receipt of the copy of this judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of the writ petition along with the copy of the judgment to the said respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms