IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31258 of 2009 BHOLA SARDAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 20.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Petitioner was not one of the persons and for that no person has been named in the FIR. A dacoity came to be committed in a big way in the house of the informant, namely, Yamuna Prasad Yadav. Bhargama P.S. Case No. 27 of 2008 therefore was instituted under sections, 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. Submission of learned counsel is that no material linking the petitioner with the crime has come during course of investigation. The reason for his implication in the case is so called confessional statement of other co-accused. But quite a few of those persons who have named the petitioner have already been enlarged on bail by the High Court. Petitioner deserves similar treatment. In view above, let the petitioner, namely, Bhola Sardar be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 27 of 2008. One of the sureties to be executed by the father of the petitioner and other by son of the petitioner, namely, Fagu Sardar and Kritya Nand Sardar respectively on due identification by the court below. Petitioner - 2 - shall cooperate in the trial by appearing on each and every date fixed in the case either by himself or through his counsel and shall not indulge in any kind of crime after grant of bail. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)