IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 15TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 24TH KARTHIKA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 824 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.18802/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- JAYA P.C., W/O.JOSE GRAHARI, AGED 36 YEARS, RESIDING AT VILAYIL KIZHAKKATHIL, MATHILIL P.O., THRIKKADAVOOR VILLAGE, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- SRI.BINOY, FATHER'S NAME AND AGED NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.ALEXANDER THOMAS,SC,KPSC FOR R1 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Contempt Case(C) No. 824 of 2010 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 15th day of November, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioner complains of non-compliance with Annexure judgment. In the same, I had directed the Public Service Commission to advice the petitioners as and when their turn arises as per the rank list. Now an additional affidavit has been filed by the Public Service Commission, wherein it is stated thus: “It is respectfully submitted that in the light of the observations made by this Hon'ble Court, during the course of the submissions in the above matter on 18.10.2010, the PSC was advised to take necessary steps to advice the petitioner in the PH quota, in order to avoid contempt of Court proceedings so as to report compliance of the directions. Accordingly, the Public Service Commission decided to advice the petitioner in view of the aforementioned aspects, without it to be treated as a precedent. The above aspects were duly reported on behalf of the Public Service Commission before the Hon'ble Court on 28.10.2010. It was then directed by this Hon'ble Court to take necessary steps in that regard and to report the same on the next posting date. It is respectfully submitted that pursuant to the above decision, the Public Service Commission has issued letter dated. 29.10.2010 addressed to the Director of Higher Secondary Education informing that the petitioner has been advised in the PH quota from the post of HSST Zoology (Jr) and further advise memo dated 29.10.2010 was also issued to the petitioner advising her accordingly to the post of HSST Zoology (Jr). In view of these aspects, it is most humbly submitted that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to close this petition and to drop all further proceedings .” Both parties now agree that the same can be recorded and the contempt case can be closed. Accordingly, the above averment in the affidavit of the Public Service Commission is recorded and the contempt case is closed. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.