HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRL.R.C.No.1880 of 2002 JUDGMENT: This criminal revision case is filed against the order of dismissal of complaint of the petitioner herein by the V- Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, in C.C.No.363 of 1999 dated 26.09.2002. Brief facts of the case are that the 2nd respondent- accused issued a cheque bearing No.641278 dated 09.03.1999 for an amount of Rs.26,000/- towards discharge of liability to the revision petitioner-complainant and when the said cheque was presented for realization, the same was bounced with an endorsement ‘funds insufficient. Thereafter, after following the procedure provided for under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the revision petitioner -complainant filed the complaint and the same was taken on file by the trial Court and numbered as C.C.No.363 of 1999. Heard both sides. The impugned order reads as under: “Complainant absent. No representation till 3.00 P.M. Process for issue of N.B.W. as required under rule 235 of R.P. not paid. In the result, the complaint is dismissed under Section 204 of Cr.P.C.” Having regard to the fact that the cheque issued by the 2nd respondent-accused to the petitioner-complainant was dated 09.03.1999, that too, for an amount of Rs.26,000/-, this Court is of the view that no purpose would be served in remitting the matter back to the trial Court at this length of time. I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order of the trial Court. The Criminal Revision Case is accordingly dismissed. _______________________________ (GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J) 15-07-2010 Gsn.