1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. A.O. NO.: 113 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s orders. appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. CORAM: S. S. SHINDE, J. APEAL FROM ORDER NO.:113 OF 2011 *** Raju Nanasaheb Shinde VERSUS Sopan Maroti Gayke *** Mr. Shripad Kulkarni , Advocate for Petitioner Mr. Kulkarni Sudhir V., Adv For R/sole. *** 1. There is consensus between learned counsel appearing for the parties that instead of adjudicating the matter on merits, the learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Jalna may be directed to hear and dispose of Special Civil Suit No.1 of 2010. 2. In the aforesaid background, Civil Judge, Senior Division, Jalna is directed to hear and dispose of Special Civil Suit No.1 of 2010 as expeditiously as possible, however, within a period of six months from today. 3. Needless to mention that, the parties to 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. A.O. NO.: 113 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s orders. appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. CORAM: S. S. SHINDE, J. the suit will cooperate the concerned Court for early disposal of the suit and will not ask for unnecessarily adjournments unless there is any extraordinary circumstance to ask for the adjournment. It is further clarified that till the suit is decided, the interim order dated 14th March, 2011 passed by learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Jalna will remain in operation. 4. It is made clear that the learned Judge should not grant unnecessary adjournment to the parties unless there is any genuine reason for granting such adjournment. 5. In that view of the matter, Appeal from Order as also Civil Application No.7774 of 2011 stand disposed of. [S. S. SHINDE, J.] Dated:13/10/2011. ans/113