;^-. ^ 77 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH : BiLASPUR SSNGLE BENCH: HON'BLE SHR! S.R. NAYAK, CJ. WRIT PETITION N0.4742 OF 2005 PETITSONER } RESPONDENTS Vs. 1. 2. 3. 4. Maruti Nandan Prathmlc Upbhokta Sahkari Bhandar Limlted, Tatpatti Colony Ward No. 21 Camp Bhitai, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Through •- ite President Uday Shankar Yadava son of Shri Shrinath Yadava, about 38 years, re3sdent of TatpattJ Cofony Ward no. 21 Camp-1, Bhiiai, Distt. Durg (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh. Through - the Pnnclpa! Secretary, Office ofthe C-hjef Min'ister, of Chhattjsgarh, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Mantmlaya, Raipur (C.G.) The State of Chhattisgarh, through - the Secretery, Department of Civi! Supplles, Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) Controiler of Food, Distt. Durg (Chhattlsgarh) CoIIector (Food), Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) Present: Mr. Uttam Pandey, iearnsd counsei for the petitioner. &4r. Vinay Harit, learned Govt. Advocate forthe State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 3rd February, 2006) AIthough it was maintained by the ieamed counsel for the petitioner in the course of argument that the respondente •- authorities without cai'iing for appjications and wrthout issuing notifications jn that regard ^^-\ ^SZ^s^-; wr 78 -X- ctandestineiy have been granting authorizations to severa! persons to run fair pric-e shops and without considering hls appjicatlon 13/04/2005 to respondente 3 and 4 for grant ofauthorization to run fair pffce shop, when the Court pointedjy asked the jearned counsel to draw the attention of the Court to specific averments made in the petition In that regard, iearned counse! though took con^iderable time, w^s not in ^ position to point out any averment made in the writ petition. The contentions raisod beforo the Court is not supportod by any pleading in regard. 8^3so other polnt was urged before me. The writ petition Is, therefore, djsmissed.as devoid of merit. No costs. Sd/-, Chief Justice