•^':'-w ^ IN THE HIGHCOURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. .2;?..%:OF 2003 /^ PETITIONER .«• Ravikant Doye, Aged 27 years, S/o Late R.H. Doye y y'fRamchandra Doye) ^^^'~.' / R/° 542' New shanti Nagar, ^^^^7"' RaipurfC.G.) •:^r^' y &• RESPONDENTS Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through-Secretary, Deparinient of Education, Secretariat, Raipur (C.G.) '.3P a- 2. Director, PubUc Instructor, Department of Education. 3. District Educatio.nOf&cer, Mahasaraund (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLES 22f6/^7LQFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. s.. Si XI-HC-22 an^'^i' ft-ii'* sn^f aRWHftf f-Q •S^^KitylfesiTllwJC^fti'tliM^ flfflOT aBiraiigS^.^fesNi'? 2003, 31I^w lIW^tf 17/09/300a Shri Ashdk Bas VaisTiTiavj, counsel for the petitiDner. .the.State.1^^'-' ' ';" ;.; ' Shri Raabir;Suigb, GA foi Thfi petifijoaer has pre^ Article 236/227 i0£ tBe ' 0|i respondents t6 : give ^fhe- coinpassionate ground in fEe D^ Thfi case of tB.e petitiai|ier ^ 'that lus fatlier aamely R.H.Doy®was worKuig in Ih^ Accounts Officei^ at Distirct aiid wlulc in sciviGC hc cxpircd niadc an. jappIiGation ibr ^ ""-' '• /'::.. 22/05/3000.^'the post of reeQrcuneIided t>v the Distriist Instructions. VideL letfer date<31 . ci->!<-il(n'iftvt.ffl^^^ I^i^ :<^i^K. ,,: ^Ssifigq si@w ..? • ^rred this writ petitaon zuider |iBsfitu|i6it; &r ^ffl petj^ner appoiiiteaent} pn Department ^of E^iucation' as ^u<atioa'Of&e, Matlasainund lon 04/05/2QOQ.' Tfac pctitibiicr c^iapassioaatc appointincnt pn Alssistant rGrade III.' wliieliL iwas igd^cation £)ffice:r, MaiiQsainund anfl it yas^ also rec6ininen|lefc^ ^ APuyiic Sl/OT/aOO lie seilt a letter to ffiat since Rawikaiit Dove tfae District Educayon, Malias^mund has not been appoiiited on coi)i@^sionate?giounffi^^cau^ tias not passed'ont the typiagj^st aiid ja^^ -•:'-1; . • :'^. ;.IH ^®!< XI-HC-22 •a^w^i Cw* 5fn|S! ^Rf^i'^rii^ p 1:'" :l.:;^ '3^'<l!!tl!^t<},ii^il l<«,ifaai!8^<;, SlfRff^BfSi "fg^r .;3f)SwX(gms r : '~'2-' ^.•test,^]us^iease^]be';recoa ..repr.eSentat.IoiT. agaia made^Ai^^^^: videAiin tilln' tlie :tvpuig. test,? the ^ :Distrie|t iieispmineildatiort Isa 13/07/: InstructiQQs. ;Th.e petitieiBcKai fhe CUief Mioister who feirw^tEtted consiiteratioa, bu;t the petifior Assistaat Grade Itt^in.^itEof; is fuUy coyered^ under fbe\ Sehfime. The case of ftse Kau^aa Suigh;fHialnic ' lasi^ Aiuiexuic P/^ regarding •gic case Qfthe Bilas Kumar iias al^ &mt. Tulasi Bai lias also b^| lespondeiits ^ ^e.sd.ir^eted- 'tcj coinpassionate gTpulid. I liaye lieard leamed coullsel Leanied ^ouiisd. fbr the ^? of the petitioner; is ftiUy c6. ^riiT?t^l^^fTtfef^:;fst<?i •<.ffl)^i< : •^•sfffigtpgn^g/ jumeaded, agaul. 1?fce ^pelTtioiier ^:saire;P.S).aiidafteE'passiB:gouf Edacati.on Qffieer made ;a ^OQl ^ .1^ Bjiwwr, Pu^^ prbacbett^thi&'MniisterantKsdso ^fiie pefyioner's cas& lor ter Iias aot been stppouitett as t| £»faetAIiaftliepetitioiiet^scase eprtipassioBate AppOHitment ^th^ simflarlT isiti^fe^ ^peisoa 'Bccri feoilsidGrcdi vide . oidcr eo^npassioaate appointniexit.? Thp io beeii coQsidered. sTBe Sase^of ^ coiiside^d. 'SSteisfore, ffiei appouiti.^tte.'pGtitiolijer' oii- forfKe pscriass.ir ' ,•;;-•>•,. •: etitionersuluoitstl'iaf ttiB case" ered; ^as. <per: •thef^heiHe fi^ ^ ,^a€- :: ^.:--'- .:!'!!u'fc-4^1-:^^ XI-HC-22 sn^t'^i ...,..K(-{!<4i'aiiSsi ^R •yf^I ^' ,,^i/':"y ^. ^ -A;"7 l'\ '^ rL| (-._ i :l^f5:^*l<sfl^|lga"ett<:igte;;'S«ai*f^' •^*iffR' ^)<<!% 3(1^^2(Kt. GoiripaSsionate a.ppotiitmeiit^ Tec'buuneiided Irv; fhe Bistrict ahd Insttucfions, fb fhe Djrectfir,' PubUc petitioaer has not beeirappoitifed Haviag heard; leamfid colunsel tb&^case ofthe^petitioiieTwas pducatiQii QfBcer, Mahasainliad i, 'but, : SCF far .': v .tHe regard^ to Ihe iacfs and ogation tliat it wiU be just petitmiier to, laals&.a delaitedy QO, l^ ior coulpassionate previous eorreSpoiidence and Etiucation Of&ccr aiid after ic circuidstanees appQUitment pcfitioDcr; thc rcspoiidcnt. aoj after cpnsideruig ;thfi case of 4 "appQiirtnient.'. \: ,.;.,;'..* WifB f6e afbresaid petition is disposed pf. Cons for iateriin relief ajid I.A. No. stand disposed ofi °|il'ittd'il-l *<l*<<rtT^1StZt<r;fl^l< ^i^srf^Tg.ai'lRr" • . inaay post. ; forfhe parties and havuig^ of tfae case, I ain'df fhe aiid"^prQipria(as^ to^ allow the ijepiresetitatioirlDtbfiiespondeitt mfintiomng aU^ Jus t:Ec6inTnendatioiis Qf^Sie iDistrict ;cipt offhc icprcscsrtatiioiL of^thc 1 sliall pass a. icasoncd ordcr ^lie vpetitioiifir &r. coiupassiQnate obseivatibris se^vatibris' aad directioiis, the writ iquently, M.W.P.No. 2646/2003 86^25/2003 for uigent hearing also Sd/- -C. BhadoQ Judge s •'ss^\ .;;^^IW1 I'llSlli!