IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 7514 of 2008 Between: Akula Satya Suri Babu S/o. A. Sree Veera Venkata Rao, Kannapuram (V), Koyyalagudem (M), West Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Village Secretary, Kannapuram Gram Panchayat, Kannapuram (V), Koyyalagudem (M), West Godavari District. 2 The Executive Officer, Gram Panchayat, Kannapuram (V), Koyyalagudem (M), West Godavari District. 3 The District Medical & Health Officer, Eluru, West Godavari District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the 1st respondent in not considering the representation dated 15.12.2007 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and clear violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the 1st respondents to consider the petitioner representation dated 15.12.2007 and permit the petitioner to establish Poultry Farm and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.P.RAJU Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.M.PRABHAKAR RAO Form-NIC-OGS/WP{MSN} The Court made the following : O R D E R:- This writ petition is filed seeking a mandamus to declare the action of the 1st respondent in not considering the petitioner’s representation, dated 15.12.2007, as arbitrary and illegal. The petitioner asserts that with a view to establishing a Poultry Farm under Self Employment Scheme, he took lease of Ac.01.00 cents of land from Alluri Raghava Rao, situated on the outskirts of Kannapuram village, Koyyalagudem Mandal, West Godavari District and made a representation dated 15.12.2007 to the 1st respondent-Village Secretary for obtaining permission to establish Poultry Farm. Now, the petitioner’s grievance is that though he made a representation intending to establish a Poultry Farm on the outskirts of the Kannapuram village, the 1st respondent-Village Secretary has not considered his representation on the ground that a complaint was made by a villager that the petitioner is establishing the Poultry Farm in the middle of the houses situated in 11 and 12 wards of Kannapuram village. Having heard the learned counsel for both the parties and perused the material placed on record, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the 1st respondent-Village Secretary to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 15.12.2007 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage. No costs. _______________ 08.04.2008 bcj