IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2170 of 2009 RAJ KISHORE PRASAD Versus CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION & ORS. ----------- 2 13/2/2009 Heard Mr. Shukla learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Vinay Krishna Tripathy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Central Board of Secondary Education (C.B.S.E.). Grievance of the petitioner in this writ application as with regard to change of name of his minor son in the records of C.B.S.E cannot be permitted. The reliance placed by the learned counsel for the petitioner on an earlier bye-laws brought on record by way of Annexure-5, being no longer in existence and infact repeated/changed in the recent bye-laws as produced by the counsel for the C.B.S.E., seems to be wholly misconceived. Even otherwise the C.B.S.E. after declaration of result on the basis of the records submitted by the school including the name of the son of the petitioner cannot make alternation in the such name unless there be a declaration by the competent court to this effect. In any when now there is no such provision for an altogether change in the name of a student in the records of C.B.S.E. the petitioner cannot claim such relief through this court. That being so, this writ application is wholly misconceived and thus dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar