1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.263/2011. (Krishna s/o Bapurao Aware Vs. The State of Mah.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.ST Shelke Adv. for applicant; Mr.KM Suryawanshi, APP for State. *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 3 rd February, 2011. ... 1) Heard. 2) The laxity shown by the officers during the raid facilitated escape of the tractors. The officers did not inform, the tractors were laden with either trolley or trailer. They did not check the movement and now desire the applicant/accused to be apprehended being owner of one of the tractors. 3) In the light of factual details, custodial interrogation of the applicant/accused not warranted. However, if in the investigation, seizure of the tractor is imperative, the authorities are at liberty to do so. 4) Interim protection dated 24.1.2011 is made absolute. The attendance is modified from every alternate day to every Sunday between 3.00 p.m.; to 6.00 p.m.till 31st May, 2011. 5) The application allowed as above. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/ 2