IBS^-frt-'i^'aiH EIGi )l?R.T 'B^r-;i!4 'n,-.A*45,^~_ •'^T_-_ t n-? d _-. ^••'^nfh'? fr r^ rtce.iuvii i^o> I.OA-? 05, AUU*? 1- Dr. A.P. ShariTi.a ^s^d about 62 'vears. S/o Sbi'.'i D.P. Sharma,(Retd.) Sundar Nagai', Q. No. 25, Raipur(CG). 2.- Dr. P..K. Tiwari, Aged about 62 years S/o Late Ramlal Tiwari Ward No. 32 Brahman Para, Rajnandgaon (CG). 3. Dr. K.L. Tikariha aged about 62 years S/o Late Ramlal Tikariha D-2, Rama Niwas, Behind Aurvedic Colony, Rohinipurani Raipir (CG). 4. Dr. P.L. Katzhare aged about 61 vears S/o Late A-mar Singli Katazhare Tahsilpara Bhanuprateppur Distt. Kaiiker (CG). 1. State of Clilia-ttisgarh tiirough the Secretary Department Health and Educaiion DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. Director, Indiaii Sysl^iii ofMedical siid Hoiiiigopathy^ Bhawan (old D.K. Hospital) Raipur (CG). 3. Principal Govf. A\iirvedic College, Raipur (CG). nf 'vro '.VR.TT PETITION WTOER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmmON OF INniA) (SB; Son'Me Mr. K. Agnfliotri, J.) Present : Shri Jitendra P^*li. Advocs-te for the petitioncrs. Shri A.B. Kachtiwaha, Uepuiv Advocate Uenerai lur ihe 'State. :Alj (Passfcu oii 17°' ofMui'c^ 2008) With the conseat ofthe parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. This petition pertains to payiiient ofretira! benefits. Tiiis Court, in the matter ofW.P. No. 4642/2004 (BaijaaA Mandal Vs. Tlie State of CSiliattisgarh and others) and other comiected Kialters, directed the CoiTiiiiittee to ooii<?ider the iTiattcr ofthe retiral dues as tlie <iiisniited ciiiestion of facts were lD^/Tolved> Th^ CoiiTiiiitte'e wa.s cou.sl'itiited bv the State Govemmeiit. nursiiant to the ord^r d^ted 19-06.2006 D?isscd m W.P. No. ~---> j------ --—— -- —--„-- .------. ».--^.-.—-._ ^- 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Va. State Govemiiier" and others) si orcier dated 13.03.2008 nassed in M-C.C. No. 105'2008 ('State of CMiattisgarh and others Vs. Baijnath Mandal and aaother). Thus, tliis petition is squas-ely covsi-ed by the judgment and order dated 31 of Januan', 2008 passed m W.P. No. 4642./2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of T". -;'"' io^ B3b ,'ianu CIiSiattisgarh and othera) aiid other comiected matters, as s'jhn'iitted by the 'eamed couiisel appearing for the parties. Tliis pefition is disposed ofin the same terms i.e. the office ofthe Advocate Gcfier^I is directed to send the case to the Coniiiiittee. within '^ r^eriod of 15 day^ from the date of receipt of £i copy of this ordcr. Thereafter, the Coniiiiittee shall issue notic^ to the oetitio?ieT^-'?-nd th^ ofiice'rs concenied. ^dtl'dn a fiirth^r pc-riod of 15 davs. Tli^ ConiEiiitte^ ^hall consider and pass order, in accordance with !aw, after affording proper opportimity ofhearin^ to the petitioners. The petitioners and the ofiicers coiicemed tTiay file additioaal documenls, ifnecessary. The entire exercise, including paynient ofretira! dues, ifany, to the petitioner, be completed within a period offour months from the date ofreceipt ofa eop37 ofthis order- One extra copy ofthc papers ofth^ p^titioxi sh^l! be supplied b)/' the leanied eoiuiscl appeanng fbr the petition^rs to Sliri A.S. Kachh^aha, Depiit}^ Advocate Ociieral, today itsel^ fbf on\vard tran^Bissioi'i to the con'iniittee. Sd/- Satish K..Agnihotri Judge