> s.rc[noi)JBd sqi.'ssqs) •suopaajip^io uopoajip 'sjapjo jio jgpjo 'S^UA jo ^UA a{qB»ms jaq.(o JGJ pue uoi(iqiqojj 'uBjopjaa SnMVQNVM J° aJi4BU aq» m iraM J° aaucnssi aqt JGJ BIPUI JO uopi4psno3 aqj, jo 4ZZ/9ZZ sappjy •iapan uoppaj HJM|^ ^ .-l^p ('O'O) -mdre-g 'JBSBM JBVieqg ^,^ 'sogjO pE3H ^^K' ,(^ .^ 'ppuBpsi UBIIUIM qr-iO qjBgsinfqqo sqj, •Z ^O*^ ('O'O) -md?^ 'oBAYEqg •§•3-0 'lusroiJEdsQ aeqsEqsBJd BXijeSBj^ pm S^AV 'Areisjoss sqi -qSnojqj, -'qjE8srBEqt[3jo-IAOF) 3^B;s sqi 'I s^uapaousay snsja^ ('Q'O) mdre^i 'jegBTUiqE-^ 'p-reog gmsnoH'0'3 'III-sp^O '1SSV 'dE^BJj mqsqg o/§'sjBsA 6(7 psSy ^7"toT^''r""""""Pi)t3P 'BuuBqg; jBum-g qssgoj^ - jauoppa^ •^^^^•••^g'p'-iSAq paiuasa^ T(ht/^"'"oray 900Z"^^i;5"""OM"S 'd'AV •jndseng 3!j§8•qjBSsiWBqq3jo ^no^ qSiH aiq<uoH aq»ui <B ^ ic ^^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B. : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. WRIT PETiTlON (S.1 N0.5152 OF 2006 Petitioner Respondents versus Yogesh Kumar Sharma The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and another Pressnt : iVir. Somkant Verma, counsel for the petitioner. !V!r. Somesh Bajaj, Govemment Advocate for the State/respondeni No.1. None appears for respondent No.2. V- (Passed on 218I of September, 2Q06) The petitioner, working as Assistant, has been transferred from Chhattisgarh Grih Nirman Mandat, Division No.1, Kabeer Nagar, Raipurto Project Division, Jashpurby order dated 12-9-2006 (Annexure p-1). 2. At this stage, the only contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner be granted iiberty to make a representation before the respondsnts - authorities raising his heaith and other problems for reconsideration of his transfer ordsr, to which learned Government Advocate appearing forthe Stete/respondent No.1 has no objection. £ 3. In the facts and cireumstances of the case, the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation, if so advised, before the appropriate authority. On such representation being made by the petitioner, the appropriate authority shall decide his representation keeping in view humanitarian aspect, on merit, within a period ofthree weeks from the receipt of the representation. l! 'i.S,""! 've 4. costs. Accordingiy, the petition stands dismissed. No order as to Certified copy as per ru!es. Sd/- ;. Satish K.Agnihbtri -. Judge ••,,!, •„