Court No.2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 1246 of 2003 Brahma Singh .................. Petitioner. Versus The District U.S. Nagar Cooperative, Union Ltd. Uttaranchal through Its Assistant Registrar and others. ............... Respondents. .................... Sri S.S. Negi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri Paresh Tripathi, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent Nos. 1,2 & 4. Sri Aashish Joshi, leaned Counsel for the respondent No.3. Dated: May 14, 2008. Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking writ of certiorari quashing he impugned order dated 05.04.2003 passed by respondent No.3, by which the petitioner was relieved and he was directed to give his joining to the Managing Director, U.P. Cooperative Union Ltd., Lucknow. 2. The petitioner was appointed on ad hoc basis on the post of Junior Clerk on 25.09.1989 for 89 days only in Cooperative Union Pradhikari (P.C.U.) Cooperative Training Centre, Mathura (U.P.). The petitioner has served near about 14 years service in the aforesaid department upto the year 2003. At the relevant time the petitioner was serving as Junior Clerk under respondent No.1 at Udham Singh Nagar. By the impugned order the petitioner has been relived for Lucknow. 3. It is alleged that the impugned order dated 05.04.2003 relieving the petitioner has illegally been passed by respondent No.1 on the wrong direction and talks held with respondent No. 2 on 02.04.2003 and 05.04.2003 to 17.05.2003 by the respondents. The respondent No.3/Managing Director, U.P. Cooperative Union Ltd. through order dated 07.04.2003 has cancelled the said order dated 05.04.2003 and directed the respondent No.1/District Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Uttaranchal, Udham Singh Nagar to restore the Petitioner’s joining at Udham Singh Nagar from where he was relieved. 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that the direction issued by the respondent No.3/Managing Director on 07.04.2003 is not being complied with by the respondent No.1. Thereafter, petitioner made representation to the Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Uttaranchal, Dehradun on 23.07.2003 to issue direction to the respondent No.1 for taking the petitioner on work/duty. The said representation is pending for decision with the Registrar, cooperative Societies. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner confined his prayer that the writ petition may be disposed of with the direction to the respondent No.4 to decide the representation of the petitioner in the light of recommendation issued by respondent No.3/Managing Director. 6. In view of above, the writ petition is disposed of finally with the direction to respondent No. 4 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 23.07.2003, contained in Annexure No. 6 to the writ petition, within a period of two months form the date of production of certified copy of this order, in the light of direction issued by the respondent No.3/Managing Direction, U.P. Cooperative Union Ltd., Lucknow on 07.05.2003. (P.C. Verma, J.) 14.05.2008 P.Singh