IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. SUIT No.3229 of 1987. Reliance Industries Ltd. and Anr. ..Plaintiff. Vs. Anchor Line Ltd. ..Defendant. Mr. Shailesh Sawant i/b Gordhandas & Fozdar for the Plaintiff. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: D.G. KARNIK,J. D.G. KARNIK,J. D.G. KARNIK,J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 23RD JANUARY, 2007. 23RD JANUARY, 2007. 23RD JANUARY, 2007. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the plaintiff. None present for the defendant. Despite order dated 6th September, 1988 directing the defendant to file written statement, the defendant has not filed its written statement. 2. Considering the nature of the suit which is a simple suit for recovery of money being the value of damaged consignment, I consider it appropriate to proceed under Order 8 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 3. The suit of the plaintiff is decreed [ 2 ] under 8 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure in terms of prayer clause. [D.G.KARNIK, [D.G.KARNIK, [D.G.KARNIK, J] J] J]