IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1085 of 2008 MANJU DEVI Versus LALITA PRASAD ----------- 2 31/7/2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court this petitioner does not fall within the category of a person in terms of Section 283(1)(C) of Indian Succession Act 1925 who may be said to have an interest in the estate of the deceased. The petitioner is only claiming to be purchaser from a person who has executed the Will. If that be so, the petitioner has his own remedy but he cannot be allowed to intervene in the Probate proceeding. That being the position in law, the court below has not committed any jurisdictional error in rejecting the application of the petitioner for being added as a party to the probate proceeding. At this stage, Mr. Narayan, counsel for the petitioner submits that as a matter of fact the Sub.Judge has no jurisdiction to initiate a proceeding for grant of probate. However this question having not raised either before the Court below or even in this civil revision application cannot be gone into on the oral submission of the counsel for the petitioner. There being thus no merit in this application, the same is dismissed. ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J. ) Abhay Kumar