1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1009 OF 2001 Milestone Mercandise Pvt. Ltd. ..Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & ors ..Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1010 OF 2001 M/s. Petron Trading Company .. Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & ors ..Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1791 OF 2001 Ashok Gangawani ..Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & ors ..Respondents WITH 2 WRIT PETITION NO.1813 OF 2001 M/s.Aakash Traders .. Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & ors ..Respondents Mr.D.B.Sawant, Advocate, for the petitioners in all Writ Petitions Mr.D.A.Nalawade, Government Pleader, for the respondent No.1 – State in W.P.Nos.1791/2001 & 1813/2001 Ms.Geeta Shastri, Advocate, for the respondent Nos.1 to 4 in W.P.Nos.1009/2001 & 1010/2001 CORAM : P.B.MAJMUDAR R.M.SAVANT, JJ. DATE : 23RD APRIL, 2009 P.C. . Since the point involved is common, all these Writ Petitions are taken together. 2. By way of this petitions, the petitioners pray for appropriate 3 directions to be issued in connection with Demand Notice at Exhibit “B” and for restraining the respondents from recovering any amount pursuant to such Demand Notice at Exhibit “B”. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the Demand Notice is in connection with supervision charges for the excise staff appointed at the premises of each of the petitioners. The learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submitted that the issue in question is already covered by the Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Government of Maharashtra & ors V/s. M/s.Deokar' s Distillery, reported in AIR 2003 SUPREME COURT 1216. Since the issue is already covered by the Judgment of the Hon' ble Supreme Court, nothing survives for consideration in the above Writ Petitions. The Writ Petitions are accordingly dismissed. Rule discharged. Interim relief in each of the above petitions stands vacated. Parties to bear their respective costs. (P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.) 4 (R.M.SAVANT, J.)