IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 11TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 22ND MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 23120 of 2010(L) -------------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- INDIRA PRIYADARSHINI, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT, "SURABHILA", MANNARKKAD COLLEGE (VIA), PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA SMT.RASHMI RAVINDRAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION (C) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-01. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PALAKKAD-678 001. 4. C.J.ANTHONY, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PALAKKAD, PIN-678 001. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.ANTONY MUKKATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.23120 OF 2010 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF GO(RT) NO.3540/2008/GEN. EDN. DATED 2.8.2008 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF GO(RT) NO.866/2009/GEN. DATED 26.2.2009 EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER ON 20.1.2010 BEFORE THE DY. DIRECTOR OF EDN. PALAKKAD EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF GO(RT) NO.1660/2080/GEN.EDN. DATED 17.4.2010 EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF GO(RT) NO.3045/2010/GEN.EDN. DATED 14.7.2010 EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE IDENTITY CARD ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY COMPETENT AUTHORITY EXT.P7 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 8.4.2010 ISSUED BY THE DPI EXT.P8 TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO.GO(RT) NO.2895/2010/G.EDN. DATED 2.7.2010 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: EXT.R1(A) TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 8.3.10 EXT.R1(B TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 20.3.2010 EXT.R1(C) TRUE COPY OF THE NEWS ITEM APPEARED IN MALAYALA MANORAMA DAILY DATED 26.4.2008 / TRUE COPY / S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ---------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No. 23120 of 2010 and I.A.No.2296 of 2011 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of February, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioner originally filed this Writ Petition challenging the orders of transfer issued to him. Although originally there was a stay, subsequently, after considering the counter affidavit of the respondent the stay was vacated. But learned counsel for the petitioner submits that both the petitioner and the fourth respondent have now requested for transfer. The petitioner has filed Exhibit P9 representation. The petitioner now seeks a direction to the second respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P9 as expeditiously as possible. Having heard the learned Government Pleader also, I dispose of the Writ Petition with a direction to the second respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P9 after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and the fourth respondent as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE vgs The words “second respondent” occurring in the 5th sentence of paragraph 1 and in the first sentence of the operative portion of the judgment in WP(C) 23120/2010L dated 11.02.2011 are corrected and substituted as “first respondent” vide order dated 24/02/2011 in I.A.No.3008/2011. Registrar (Judicial)