IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20607 of 2009 1. SATAN CHOUPAL 2. PRAKASH CHOUPAL @ PRAGAS CHAUPAL 3. KRISHNA KUMAR CHOUPAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 22.06.2009 Heard both sides. Petitioners have approached this court for grant of bail in a case instituted under sections 341, 342,, 448, 376/511 and 34 of Indian Penal Code. It is further contended that the evidence on record including the statement of victim do indicate that there was only an attempt to commit rape. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the learned Sessions Judge has already granted liberty to the petitioner to renew prayer for bail no sooner the charges are framed. The admitted position is that the charge-sheet has already been submitted. Counsel for the petitioners stated before this court that committal proceeding has also taken place. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court can only observe for the present that the Trial Court should proceed with the trial and frame the charges against the petitioners within two months from the date of receipt of this order so that that petitioner may avail the liberty granted by the learned Sessions Judge under the impugned order. With this observation, this application stands disposed off. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. ) 2