3i^iqiTfi;-tro '?faTT SH^T sh*iiqi 3=5^' -<||<||<y><l|, 0lTfiy'|lS, [s|l'iiy^< iflNdl **<1* •••---—--••-•--•--•-••--•-•^ 200 ani?r iraw (4ci(-i«i<{ti) ?^iwafer •sn^T Ss: HOHSBLB sHSi.DHIRBNDRftMisHRA. J. APpyCANT Vs. NON-APPLICANT Mu: 'aee' fu: Sta' |licinar Uupta, son ot tiliiv 1-Tasad Uupta, fi a-bout 32 veaj''s. Occu'Dation ~ Shiksha. ^ni, R/o Village Sode^la, Police Station ^ur, Tehsil aild District - Raigarh (C.G.) dt (JhhatUsgarn, tlirougn Uistnct Ma^istra.te.^ Raigarh;. District Raj.gorh (C.G=) ynn Amit yi'iai-ma, Advoci Shri U.K. Beriwal, Addl. f 'l'tie petitioner has tiled against tlie order clated 1'2-/ 89/2007 wtiereby learhed ^ttl has rejected ttie revision ot tni Uhiel Juclicial Magistrate, Kaij by wtiicn tne appiicauon ot th Cr.j-'.C. tias been rejectecl. 'l'he undisputea tacts ol on b-5-^iUUY anct ne was remanc otlences punistiable under yect' sheet against tl-ie petitioner was petitioner was remancled to U- Magistrate. Leanied counsel tor tne yection 4'2U ol l.t^.U, is punistiat the provisions of Section 167(2)1 was entltiea lor baii as ttie ctliarKe ^ti<ii^<il*< *tw<»iftf^ls^ <F't^g.i< '^3tfOT3TI^f l.te tor tne petitioner, llblic n-osecutor tor ttie Htate. |nis petltion unaer yection 482 ot Ur.l-'.C. 'l-'^iUU'/ passecl in cnminal Kevision No. 4clcimonal Bessions dudge (K.'r.u.j Kaigarh petitioner prelerred against the orcler ol passed in Unminal:Case No. lUiy/^uu'/ petitioner unaer Bection lb7 ('^il ot me ^at-h f<ie case are ttiat the petitioner was arrested |ed to tirat juclicial custody on 8-S-2UU7 tor )ons zriy aiia 4'^SU ol I.f.C. ancl ttie criarge' Itiled only on 'l-'t-lWJI i.e. t>lst day alter the [e judicial custody by tlie Chiel Judicial Ipetitioner su&mits ttiat tne otlence under [le witti impnsonment ol Y years anct as per proviso tajl.llj ol me Cr.f.C., tne appucant sheet coulcl not be -lilect wimm a penod XI-HG—78 ^- 3n^r?nl<-< ?TSfff3Tli^T^>1 f 3^r ^w\^, ®Tfl'y'i<o,Ri0iyy ^..(n.?.Mo,, Tnwrr wira? ........................................................^ 200 an^yr tisiq; (ipf^g^w) TODWdfCTsii^r su&sectuently ol GU clays irom ttie date ol tu-s) tn'e application lor bail undei] observation that lor ttie purpo^i ai-rest or llie ctate on wnicn tnel tlius tlie ciiai'ge sneet tias beeib above tinding tias Deen Sessions Judge by the impugne^ Learned counsel lor the {}i lor ttie purpose ot Kection I0'/(^j clays envisagect by proviso (affllj is remanded to jucliaal Magistrate. In tlie instant case, Uius tne cnai'ge sneet was was oDtainect, tnerelore, me uncler yection lb'/(^) ot tlie Cocl| matter ol Cnaganli Satyasat'aydi gc 2l3u. The above legal position n-iblic I-'rosecutor. 'l'Iius in view ot tne seffletl ciate ol lirst juclicial remand, me| that tne cnai-ge stieet tia.s been 1| is Dased on en-oneous computatip In the result, tne petition| Uouits Delow are set aside. ^ii^icpil'f 'w^ ^fet^' •<F<Ii-^i< ^T3TRfflL3n^?r remanct. However, tMe tnal Uourt rejected yection ib7(2) ol tne Cr.^.c. wim ttie ot computing bU days eitner ttie date ol !:cnai'ge sneet is lilea is to be excludect aiid lilecl wittiin a penocl ol &U clays anct the allirmecl by tne leamed Adclitional order. ititioner su&mits tliat it is settled law tnat [j ot ttie Cr.l^.u., tne ctetention penod ol bU (tommences trom tne date wl-ien me accused tor ttie tirst time Dy tne concerned irst remand was oDtainect on S-5-^;UU7 and Ifiedly tiled on 6 lat day alter the first rem.aiid ^titioner is entitled to tie released on bail Ip. Keliance is placed on tlie clecision in Uie ^na -v- State of A.P. reported in AIR 1986 custc|cty admiqtedlv p^titioner |is not clisputecl by me learnect Aciditional law'that the period commences trom the [linding reeorciecl by botti tne Courts beiow tled on tlie t>utn clav trom ttie date ot ai-rest t>n and the same cannot be sustained. |is allowect. 'i'ne orders passed by bottl the 3Sq'^TFn^RT, ^rfl^'KS, Rl<?il+iy ^.^-^.Mo 31t./2B07- ^Wft\ tbNlcb""""""""""""" """"""""""""""^ 200 an^r iigg; C^?f^??l) SII^I.'RI R-fi* WII 311^1 ifctli* ''!" TRIRIT'afCT aii^i Consequently, UT.C applicati<|)n of the Cr.R.C. is allowed and it is tuniistling a personal bond in th< sureties eacn 'ot •me liKe amount Magistrate, Kaigarn, fae snall tie re| Uertilied copy as per Fules. chiAfi<n41Ti ^Ht^^T f^L<^ <r^i'^l< ^73TfiPT3IT^[ ot the petltioner under yection Ib'/i^j directed that m tine event ot petitioner's : sum ot Ks. 1U,UUU/- with two solvent to the satislaction ot tfte uniet Juclicial eased on bail. GR.PRJ— FS/246—2/2007— 50.QOO.