IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 23RD NOVEMBER 2009 / 2ND AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 31687 of 2009(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. AMBIKA.S, D/O. SANTHAMMA PUTHUVEEDU, VALATHUNGAL PO, KOLLAM. 2. GEETHA T D/O. ANANDAVALLY, SUNDARAMVATTATHU VEEDU KARIKKUZHI, MAYYANADU PO, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.SHABU SREEDHARAN SRI.N.A.JOHN JACOB RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HELATH & FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER HEALTH DEPARTMENT, COLLECTORATE, KOLLAM. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT GOVT. HOSPITAL,MAYYANADU, KOLLAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P. NANDAKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.31687 OF 2009 (E) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of November, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioners were provisionally appointed as Hospital Attendants Grade-II in the Government Hospital, Mayyanadu. They claimed regularization and that was ordered to be considered by the respondents. Accordingly, their claim was considered and by Ext.P6 order issued by the first respondent, their claim has been turned down. It is challenging Ext.P6, that this writ petition is filed. 2. A reading of Ext.P6 itself shows that the appointment of the petitioners were under Rule 9(a)(i) of the Kerala Subordinate Service Rules, 1958. If so, the petitioners have no right to continue beyond the term of their appointment. In such circumstances, I am not persuaded to think that there is anything to be considered in this writ petition. Writ petition fails and is dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No.31687 /09 :2 :