IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52935 of 2008 RAJ KISHORE HAZRA @ CHOTU Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 18/05/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner, who is the husband, apprehends arrest in a complaint case under Sections- 498A and 323 of I.P.C. The submission is for willingness to revive matrimonial harmony. Considering the nature of allegations at page-6 of the complaint with regard to his behaviour, this Court is not persuaded to grant him the privilege of anticipatory bail. The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner shall be considered by the court below in accordance with law on its own merits and the guidelines of this Court for grant of bail in matrimonial matters when the court below shall be at liberty to appropriately consider matters including that of issuance of notice to the opposite party, without being prejudiced by the present order of rejection. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)