1` IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR C.A.No. 4689/2007 in C.R.A. No. 280/2002 Sou. Anita Dnyneshwar Wardhekar vs. Dnyaneshwar Ramkrishana Wardhekar ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : A.P. Lavande ,J DATE : 31.8.2007 Heard Mr. Khadse, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Kothari, learned counsel for the respondent. By this application, the applicant seeks recall of the order dated 11.8.2006 by which Civil Revision Application No. 280/02 was disposed of. The revision was disposed of on 11.8.2006 in the absence of the learned counsel for the applicant. The revision was heard on 2.8.2006 and 4.8.2006 and since none appeared on behalf of the applicant on 11.8.2006 the revision was disposed of. It is the case of the applicant that Advocate Mr. Sambre appearing for the applicant had mentioned the matter on 11.8.2006 in the morning session to fix the matter in the next 2` week. However, inadvertently the matter was called out in the afternoon session and was disposed of. This position is not disputed by Mr. Kothari, learned counsel for the respondent. In view of this position the order dated 11.8.2006 is recalled. Civil Revision Application No. 280/2002: By separate order passed today in C.A.No. 4689/2007 the revision application has been recalled. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, I do not find any ground to take a contrary view than the one taken by me in order dated 11.8.2006. Hence, for the very same reasons mentioned in the said order the revision stands dismissed. Judge patle