IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.CHELAMESWAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 5TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 14TH BHADRA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 761 of 2011(S) ---------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPCR.236/2011 Dated 30/06/2011 .................... PETITIONER(S): 3RD RESPONDENT IN WPC: -------------------------------------------------------------- PRAMOD.K.R., S/O. RADHAKRISHNAN, AGED 30 YEARS, KANDATHIL HOUSE, AROOR.P.O., CHETHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.PREMCHAND SMT.A.A.DILSHAH RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. RARIMOL.P.R., D/O. RAJAPPAN.K.P., AGED 23 YEARS, HAPPY VILLA, CHAPPAIPARAMBIL, NANTHAYATKUNNAM, NORTH PARAVUR.P.O., PARAVUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. (PETITIONER IN WPCR NO. 236/2011 (HABEAS CORPUS) PIN-689019. 2. RAJAPPAN.K.P., AGED 63 YEARS, HAPPY VILLA, CHAPPAIPARAMBIL NANTHAYATKUNNAM, NORTH PARAVUR.P.O.,PARAVUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT(1ST RESPONDENTS FATHER)PIN-689019. 3. LAILA, W/O. OF RAJJAPAN.K.P., AGED 54 YEARS, HAPPY VILLA, CHAPPAIPARAMBIL NANTHAYATKUNNAM, NORTH PARAVUR, PARAVUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-689019. (1ST RESPONDENTS MOTHER) BY ADV. SRI.M.A.MOHAMMED SIRAJ FOR R1 SRI.K.M.MANOHARAN FOR R1 SRI.P.PRIJITH FOR R1 SRI.S.SREEKUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.P.PRIJITH THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN COC 761/2011 ANNEXURE A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENTOF THIS COURT IN WPCRL. 236/2011 DT. 30.6.11 ANNEXURE B TRUE COPY OF THE WOUND CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE CHC, AROOKUTTY DT. 8.7.11 /TRUE COPY/ J.Chelameswar, C.J. & P.R.Ramachandra Menon, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Contempt Case (Civil) No. 761 OF 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 5th day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT J.Chelameswar, C.J. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, there is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Even on an earlier occasion, i.e. on 17.08.2011, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. In the circumstance, we do not see any reason to examine the allegations made against the respondents. The Contempt Petition is therefore dismissed. J.Chelameswar, Chief Justice. P.R.Ramachandra Menon, Judge. ttb