IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CIVIL SIDE REVIEW PETITION ST. NO.208 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.70 OF 2007 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.29 OF 2010 Shri Prakash M. Morbale & Anr. ...Petitioners. v. Shri Akaram B. Naik Since deceased through his L.Rs. Smt. Darubai B. Naik Since deceased through her L.Rs. 1a) Urmila A. Naik & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.N.J.Patil, adv. For the Petitioners. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 26, 2010 P.C. 1 The delay is hereby condoned. Review Petition be registered. 2 After perusal of the judgment passed by this Court on 30th July, 2009 in Second Appeal No.70 of 2007, I find that no ground is made out for review. There were concurrent findings of the facts by both the Courts below that the deceased Bhaurao, the vendor was not exclusive owner of the suit property. As the suit property was ancestral property in his hand, his wife and children were also entitled to have - 2 - their share in the same. Both the Courts below have also given findings that there was no legal necessity for Bhaurao to dispose off the suit property. He could sell his own share and he could not have sold the shares of his wife and children. This Court found no substantial question of laws involved in the second appeal. 3 In view of the above circumstances, the review petition stands dismissed. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)