IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 18455 of 2007 Between: Mattaparthi Veera Venkata Satyanarayana S/o.Late Venkata Swamy, R/o.D.No.6-165, Tottaramudi village & Post Mukteswaram Inavilli Mandal, East Godavari District ..... PETITIONER AND 1.The Endowment Department, Rep.by the Regional Joint Commisisoner, Multi Zone-I, Kakinada, East godavari District 2.The Deputy Commissioner, Endowments Department Kakinada, East Godavari District 3.The Assistant Commisisoner, Endowments Department Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. 4.Sri Mukteswara And Mooleswara Swamy Temple Tottarmudi village, Mukteswaram, Tottaramudi Post, Inavilli Mandal, East godavari District, rep.by its Manager .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declare the order passed by the 1st respondent in Revision petition No.377 of 2005 dated 6.2.2006 in confirming the orders passed by the 2nd respondent in OA.No.94 of 1999 dated 18.1.2005 as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to the provisions of AP Charitable and Hindu Religious and Endowments Act 30/1987 and consequently set aside the said orders and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.L.V.S.NAGARAJU Counsel for the Respondent Nos1 to 3.: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : Sri V.T.M.Prasad. The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No.18455 of 2007 ORDER: Sri L.V.S.Nagaraju, learned counsel for the petitioner, addressed a letter to the Registrar (Judicial), on 10.03.2008, stating that the petitioner in this writ petition had instructed him to withdraw the writ petition, as his case is considered by the respondents. In the light of the said letter, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. ________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA,J 11th March, 2008. v v To 1. Two CCs to 2. Two CD copies.