Crl. Misc. No. M-7423 of 2011 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-7423 of 2011 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 14.03.2011 Naresh Kumar ..........Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ..........Respondents BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. R.S. Athwal, Advocate for the petitioner. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. Crl. Misc. No. 13556 of 2011 Application is allowed as prayed for. Crl. Misc. No. M-7423 of 2011 The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of Naresh Kumar for issuing directions to respondents No.1 and 2 to entrust the investigation of case FIR No. 156 dated 30.9.2010 registered under Sections 302/307/379/427/148/149 IPC at Police Station Model Town, Hoshiarpur to some independent agency. Admittedly, earlier also petitioner has approached this Court for the same relief by way of filing Crl. Misc. No. M-33160 of 2010, in which, following order was passed on 6.12.2010:- “This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking a direction for entrustment of investigation of the case registered vide FIR No. 156 dated 30.9.2010 under Sections Crl. Misc. No. M-7423 of 2011 (O&M) (2) 302/307/379/427/148/149 IPC at Police Station Model Town, Hoshiarpur, to an independent agency outside the jurisdiction of district Hoshiarpur. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage he shall be satisfied if a direction is issued to respondent No.3 to look into the grievance of the petitioner, who is complainant and author of the FIR. He has also referred to affidavit dated 16.11.2010 (Annexure P-6) to contend that petitioner wants to make a statement before the investigating agency in terms of the said affidavit. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that respondent No.3 may look into the grievance of the petitioner and take steps as deemed appropriate.” Since directions have already been issued to look into the grievance of the petitioner and to take steps as deemed appropriate, no ground is made out to entertain this petition. Petition is dismissed accordingly. March 14, 2011 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE