IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17897 of 2009 1. GANESH SHANKAR VIDYARTHI S/O LATE GAURISHANKAR MOCHI R/O VILL.- MALAHI, P.S.- SURSAND, DISTT.- SITAMARHI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPTT., GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPTT., BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, BRIDGE DESIGN CIRCLE, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPTT., PATNA ----------- 2. 9.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The claim that the petitioner was appointed on 23.3.1997 in the unified cadre of Accounts Clerk after merger on 30.12.1981 with effect from 1.5.1980 and that any demerger on 28.9.1999 subsequently shall not relegate him to the pay scale of a Junior Accounts clerk are issues which stand decided by more than one judgment of the Court, copies whereof have been annexed to the writ application. Counsel for the State points out that the petitioner appears to have rushed to this Court directly against the impugned order when there is no order impugned also. He, therefore, submits that the petitioner may represent the matter before the authorities which shall then be considered properly in accordance with law and the pronouncements of this 2 Court. The application is disposed off with observation that if the petitioner files a representation, let the same be considered and disposed by a reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The application stands disposed. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)