IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No.5620 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.1.2009. Smt. Asha Khanna and another ....Petitioners Versus Pran Nath Khanna and another ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr.B.R.Mahajan, Advocte for the petitioner.s RAJESH BINDAL, J. **** The challenge in the present petition is to the order passed by the learned Court below whereby the application filed by the petitioners under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC for amendment of the suit for declaration/permanent injunction and damages under Section 142 of Trade Marks Act, 1999 (for short 'the Act') was dismissed on the ground that the relief which is sought by the petitioners by way of amendment in the suit is not covered under the provisions of Section 142 of the Act, as for the relief which is sought by way of amendment would not be covered under provisions of Section 142 of the Act and the petitioners will have separate independent cause of action to claim that relief. To this observation of learned Court below, no illegality could be pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioners. Accordingly, while concurring with the view expressed by the learned Court below, the present revision petition is dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) 19.1.2009 JUDGE Reema