HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.5940 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.08.2011 **** ASI Satnam Singh . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. KG Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG Punjab **** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner seeks a direction for his promotion to the post of Sub Inspector from the date when his juniors were promoted, along with all consequential benefits. (2). Learned counsel for the petitioner states that though the petitioner has been granted promotion from the due date vide order dated 01.07.2011 (Annexure R1), however, the said order is silent with regard to the arrears of pay as also the full salary and regularization of the suspension period etc. (3). Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the fact that substantial relief has already been granted to him, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation to the competent authority claiming the left out reliefs, which shall be considered and disposed of within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (4). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 10.08.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge