IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 24401 of 2007 Between: K. Chetan Suvignya, S/o. Dr. Kumar Kesaraj, R/o. 2-5-251, Nakkalgutta, Hanmakonda, Warangal District being minor, Rep by his father and natural guaradian, Dr. Kumar Kesaraj ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Convenor, EAMCET-2007, J.N.T.U. SIT Building, Kukatpally, Hyderabad. 2 Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep by its Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Secretariat, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondents in not calling the students who got below 50000 Rank in EAMCET-2007 for the III Phase counseling of B.Pharmacy ( Bi.P.C. Stream) Scheduled to be held on 18.11.2007 and in not following the Roster system in allotment of seats to the I year B.Pharmacy Course illegal Arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to call students who got below 50000 Rank in EAMCET-2007 for the III Phase counseling of B.Pharmacy ( Bi.P.C) Scheduled to be held on 18.11.2007 and to follow Roster System in allotment of seats to the I year B.Pharmacy Course and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.GIRI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.K.RATHANGA PANI REDDY The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No : 24401 of 2007 O R D E R : This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not calling the students, who got below 50000 rank in EAMCET-2007 for the III phase counselling of B.Pharmacy (Bi.P.C Stream) for the academic year 2007-2008. Since the admissions for the academic year 2007-2008 were over long back, nothing survives for adjudication on merits at this point of time. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J Dated: 23-04-2009 KLP