1 mgj IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Suit No.848 of 1983 Mr.Jokhin Vincent Gomes ..Plaintiff vs. 1 Mr.JosephVincent Gomes and others ..Defendants None for plaintiff None for defendants,. CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI J. 27th November, 2009 P.C. 1 The suit was filed in the year 1983. The sole plaintiff had expired and after the amendment his heirs have been brought on record. It appears from the record that the heirs were brought on record on 7th August, 2003. 2 The defendants and their Advocate were absent when the suit appeared on my board on 4th September, 2009. The plaintiffs Advocate was directed to argue so as to 2 assist the Court to frame the issues or hand over the draft issues. He sought time. Prior thereto the matter had appeared on board on 20th July, 2009, on which date also it was clarified that the parties must be ready to have the issues framed or the suit would be dismissed for want of prosecution. 3 Today the plaintiffs and their Advocate are absent. At one stage it was stated that there is an amicable settlement. The suit is for partition. When it is called out today none appeared on behalf of the plaintiff. The suit is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.)