IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.20136 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : MARCH 28, 2011 MOHINDER SINGH ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS THE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER, HARYANA & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Gopi Chand, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. SS Nara, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. HP Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.4. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 Tej Parkash-respondent No.4 was appointed Lambardar for Village Ganiar, Tehsil Narnaul, District Mahendergarh. The petitioner filed an appeal, which has been dismissed. Even the revision petition filed by the petitioner has been dismissed. Order dated 24.5.2006 (Annexure P-3), passed by the Collector, Mahendergarh, order dated 29.4.2008 (Annexure P-4), passed by the Commissioner, Gurgaon Division, Gurgaon, and order dated 27.8.2009 (Annexure P-5), passed by the Financial Commissioner, Haryana, are under challenge. 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that for the wrong reasons, in regard to the petitioner, it has been observed that he was involved in electricity theft. 3 I have considered the contention of the learned Civil Writ Petition No.20136 of 2009 2 counsel for the petitioner. 4 So far as the merits of the petitioner vis-a-vis respondent No.4 are concerned, they have been held to be comparable, so far as age and educational qualification are concerned. 5 This writ court does not find any reason to judicially review the orders passed by the authorities under the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1987, as applicable to Haryana. 6 No ground for interference is made out. 7 The petition is dismissed. March 28, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?