IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRAPRADESH AT HYDERABAD HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.885 of 2010 DATE:03.08.2010 Between: Krupa Madhuri …… Petitioner And: The State through SHO, WPS, CCS and another …..Respondents HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.885 of 2010 ORDER : This revision petition is filed by the petitioner/defacto-complainant against order dated 06.04.2010 passed by the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad in Crl.M.P.No.115/2010 in Crl.A. No.134 of 2009 by which the lower Court allowed the petition filed under proviso to Section 24(8) Cr.P.C in the following terms: “In the result, the petition is allowed. Petitioner’s counsel Sri G.Narender Raj and Ms.Saleema Naaz, Advocates are permitted to assist the Public Prosecutor in presenting the case of the prosecution before the Court in C.A. No.134/2009.” 2) Apprehending that some events may happen in the lower Court while carrying out this order, the petitioner filed this revision petition. This Court is of the opinion that the alleged apprehensions of the petitioner are unreal and baseless. The petitioner wants to fight a ghost which is non-existent. In case there is any cause of action for questioning any future event, it cannot be subject matter in the present revision petition. 3) Hence, the revision petition is dismissed. _______________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J August 3, 2010 KSH