IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 2122 of 2008 (M/S) Joginder Singh …... Petitioner Versus Smt. Santosh Garg …… Respondent ………. Mr. Lok Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.K.Sharma, Advocate for the respondent. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the impugned judgment passed by the Appeal Court as well as the release order passed by the learned Trial Court, I find that both the Courts below have concurrently held against the petitioner. There is no warrant for interference because the need of the respondent for occupation of the shop in question was bona fide. The petition is dismissed in limine. (V. K. Gupta, C. J.) 08.12.2008 A