IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 29TH MARCH 2007 / 8TH CHAITHRA 1929 RP.No. 329 of 2007(S) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN OP.31879/2002 Dated 26/06/2006 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/PETITIONER ----------------------------- 1. DENNY V.D, S/O DEVASSY, T.C.NO.68/1601, KUMALY NAGAR, RES.NO.110, PACHALOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-27. 2. INDUCHOODAN.N, S/O NARAYANAN NAIR, VALLOPPILLIL HOUSE, KUTTIKKATTUKARA P.O., UDYOGAMANDAL 683 504. BY ADV. SRI.ANTONY V. PAUL RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS ------------------------ 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, VIDHYUTHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. KURIEN E KALATHIL, CONTRACTOR, PYNADATH, SUBRAMANYAM SWAMY KOVIL LANE, RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION,(S.S.K.R.A)B-5, JAWAHAR NAGAR, KAWDIAR P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 BY ADV. SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC FOR KSEB R2 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI BENHY GERVACIS THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/03/2007,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN & ANTONY DOMINIC,JJ. ----------------------------------------------- R.P.NO.329 OF 2007 IN O.P.NO.31879 OF 2002 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 29th day of March, 2007 O R D E R Raman,J. Petitioners seek for review of the judgment of this Court dated 26/6/2006. The judgment dealt with elaborately various contentions put forth in the original petition. Though the learned counsel for the petitioners would contend that some of the aspects were not dealt with, no specific instances as such with reference to the judgment could be pointed out. The review is not an appeal or a petition for re-hearing. If any finding recorded in the impugned judgment is not correct in law, the remedy is to file an appeal therefrom. We are not satisfied that any grounds are made out within the parameters as prescribed for seeking the review. We are also not satisfied that there are any errors apparent on the face of the record calling for any review. In the circumstances, the review petition is dismissed. P.R.RAMAN, Judge. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge. kcv.