IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN TUESDAY, THE 10TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 21ST MAGHA 1930 CRP.No. 84 of 2009(G) OP.80/2001 OF DISTRICT COURT, PALAKKAD REVN. PETITIONER: 1ST RESPONDENT IN THE OP: ---------------------------------------------- PETRONET CCK LIMITED, IRIMPANAM INSTALLATION OF BPCL, IRIMPANAM, KOCHI-682 309, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMPANY SECRETARY, SHRI.S.RAMESH. BY SENIOR ADV. SRI.M.PATHROSE MATTHAI SRI.SAJI VARGHESE SMT.MARIAM MATHAI RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER & 2ND RESPONDENT: -------------------------------- 1. THANKA, W/O.PAZHANI, PAZHAYAKALAM, CHITHALI P.O., ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. DEPUTY COLLECTOR, THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY (KERALA), COCHIN-COIMBATORE-KARUR PIPELINE PROJECT, RENJISHA BUILDING, ALINCHUVADU, EDAPPALLY P.O., KOCHI-682 024. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LATHA THANKAPPAN THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------------------------------ C.R.P. NO. 84 OF 2009 G ------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 10th February, 2009 O R D E R The first respondent filed O.P.No.80 of 2001 under Section 10(2) of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipe Lines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962, claiming enhanced compensation. The court below, by the order impugned, allowed an enhanced compensation of Rs.4,641/-. 2. Several Civil Revision Petitions, where the same question as is raised in this Revision is involved, have been admitted by this Court. However, since the amount awarded is only Rs.4,641/-, comparatively a negligible amount when compared with the amount involved in the other cases, I am not inclined to admit this Civil Revision Petition. If the Revision is admitted, the respondents will have to appear before this Court to contest a matter in which the amount involved is only below Rs.5,000/-. To avoid such a situation, though the connected matters have been admitted, I am not inclined to admit this Revision. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. However, it is made clear that dismissal of this Civil Revision Petition shall have no impact on the maintainability of the connected Civil Revision Petitions nor C.R.P. NO. 84 OF 2009 :: 2 :: would it affect the contentions of the petitioner in the connected Revisions. This order will not be treated as a precedent in any other connected matters. (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/