IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.20024 of 2011 Date of decision : 31.10.2011 Ranjeet Singh and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Manoj Makkar, Advocate for the petitioners. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The petitioners pray that they are contractual employees and the respondents are likely to replace them with another set of contractual employees. While making a grievance out of it the petitioners have placed reliance upon the judgments of this Court. On due consideration of the matter, I am of the opinion that the petitioners' services are purely contractual in nature and are governed by a contract of employment as indicated in the appointment letter. They are liable to be terminated in accordance with this appointment letter. The petitioners' grievance that their services are being replaced by another set of contractual employees is not borne out from any other material on record. Having regard to the aforesaid, there is no reason to grant the prayer of the petitioners at this stage. However, in the event of the petitioners being confronted with the situation when their services are C.W.P.No.20024 of 2011 -2- likely to be replaced with another set of contractual employees, they are at liberty to approach this Court once again. The petition stands disposed of. 31.10.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss