IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34377 of 2009 SHAILESH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 22.12.2009 Heard. The petitioner is said to have pierced a chura into the body of the deceased from his back and to have moved it back and forth. The contention is that the cause of death was not the injury allegedly caused to the deceased by the act attributed to the petitioner. In support of the contention, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner read out to me from the contents of the postmortem report. It is true that the cause of death has been opined on account of the trauma caused due to an injury on chest but also by the injury which was inflicted by the petitioner. Considering that aspect of the matter the petitioner appears the assailant of the deceased considering which the prayer is dismissed. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )