IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH AUGUST 2011 / 26TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 22304 of 2011(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. ASHA MONCY JOSEPH, AGED 21 YEARS, D/O. MONCY JOSEPH, MAPRATHU HOUSE, ALLEPPY, PIN - 688 525. 2. SOMIYA SARA ZACHARIAH, AGED 22 YEARS, D/O. ZACHARIAH OMMEN, MURINGASSERIL HOUSE, PURAMATTOM.P.O, PATHANAMTHITTA - 689 543. BY ADV. SRI.K.A.MANZOOR ALI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (CUSAT), REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, THRIKKAKARA.P.O, KOCHI -22. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, THRIKKAKARA.P.O,KOCHI-22. ADV. SRI.SURIN GEORGE IPE SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAI, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.22304/11 APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE MARK LIST OF THE 1ST PETITIONER. EXT.P1(a): TRUE COPY OF THE MARK LIST OF THE 2ND PETITIONER. EXT.P2: A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT EVIDENCING REMITTANCE OF FEES FOR REVALUATION BY THE 1ST PETITIONER. EXT.P3: A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT EVIDENCING REMITTANCE OF FEES FOR REVALUATION BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE OFFER LETTER OF 2ND PETITIONER. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 22304 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 17th day of August, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners are Computer Science and Engineering Students. When the results were declared, 1st petitioner failed in “Engineering Mathematics II” in the IIIrd Semester and the 2nd petitioner failed in “Advanced Computer Networks” in VII Semester. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 6 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp