IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No.272 of 2010 Laxman Singh Bora ……Petitioner Versus Union of India Secretry Home, Government of India at New Delhi and others .…Respondents Ms. B.S. Adhikari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned G.A. for the State/respondent no.3. Dated 19th April , 2010 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. Hon’ble Nirmal Yadav, J. By way of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought relief for issuing a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 1 to take the decision in the matter of referring the investigation to the CBI of the murder of Yogesh Singh Bora. Heard Mr. B.S. Adhikari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned G.A. for the State/respondent no. 3 and perused the material available on record. The material available before us in the case indicates that the matter was firstly investigated by C.B.C.I.D. who submitted the final report. Thereafter, final report was rejected by the court concerned. The matter was again investigated by the regular police who again submitted the final report and this final report was again rejected by the court concerned. Now, current situation is that the matter is still pending before the court as a complaint case. In the aforesaid circumstances, petitioner may raise his grievance before the Court where the complaint is pending. We are not supposed to issue any direction by way of writ to transfer the investigation to any other Agency. We do not find any force in the writ petition. Hence, the writ petition is accordingly dismissed. (Nirmal Yadav, J.) (B.C. Kandpal, J.) JKJ 19.04.2010