IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.57768 of 2007 SOGARA KHATOON Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 09.5.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the state. The informant has entered his appearance through his counsel. Counsel for the petitioner has filed supplementary affidavit annexing the affidavit sworn by the informant that on some wrong information, he instituted a case u/S 304B, 328/34 of the IPC against the accused persons. In fact his daughter has consumed poisonous medicine by mistake and there is no torture for demand of dowry. Counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that in the case diary charge sheet has been submitted u/S 306 & 498A of the IPC. I find discrepancy in the affidavit as well as in the charge sheet which has been submitted u/S 306 of the IPC according to which it was a case of suicide. Counsel for the informant submits that he was given wrong information and that is why this case has been instituted u/S 304B read with 498A of the IPC. - 2 - I find that the petitioner is guilty of tampering with the evidence and influencing the witnesses. So far the informant is concerned, he has instituted a false case, as such, a criminal case should be instituted against the informant of Dalsingh Sarai P.S. Case No. 270/07 for instituting a false case. Prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner is rejected. A.K.V ( Mridula Mishra, J.)