IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.19651 of 2009 SHAMBHU PRASAD, SON OF DANANJAY MAHATO @ DHANRAJ MAHATO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – MADHOPUR, P.S. – BAKHTIYARPUR, DISTRICT – PATNA …………………….. PETITIOENR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …………………… OPP. PARTY ----------- 2 09.06.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary corrections in the prayer portion and paragraph 13 of the bail application. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under Section 452, 341, 323 and 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is not named in the First Information Report. He along with one Rajesh Kumar were drivers of the car hired to abduct the children from the uncle’s house. The allegations are mainly against the father of the informant and the other members who had gone to the village of the grand parents of the informant to abduct her. Rajesh Kumar has already been granted bail by this Court. Considering this aspect, let above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Sheikhpura P.S. Case No. 17 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of rupees ten thousand with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura. Kundan/ (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)