(. )-1'Z$& ^§11^^^s JTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT^L/^PUR WRIT PETITION [C] N0. 13>r/200^- 'ITIONER ^'* .. Rajesh Kumar Shukla, S/o Late /*' w ^0..^.'-''' .••'*Heera Lal Shukla, aged about 36 >'' riy ..^' years, R/o- Station Road Charapa, 7>f^- .. ^^€^ ;^y .^>" Distt.- Janjgir-Champa, C.G. VERSUS -^.RegionalTransport Authority, Chhattisgarh at Raipur. ^'S'^l i) °'? ^ 2.Secretary,Regional Transport >* 1° ^t.^f ^ .-, .- /^. l 1 , .• iPONDENTS ^^ at V°\,..^ Authority, Chhattisgarh Bilaspur. 'WRIT PETITION UNDER^ ARTICLE 226 OF_THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA ^ /.y :^'°' XI-HC-78 HTHcTTSb+llch 3ST -^WW^, V^\W}6, RlcllUy . U:P..CA^;J,.^ WT 200^ 311^1 i<a<h (licl'dcl^,]iT) 3:[11^T?)TR-<i»b craTsn^TstiiI* .^ ??(ITWHf?(r-»I^T 31.01.2007 agau|ist Shri Anshul R. Shrivastava Heara. The grievaace oltjie petiti(| ol stage carnage pemut Deion iiowever ftie saiae fi.as not beenl clirecUon faas been sougllt applicauon ot Uie peuuoner tor e: 1 have heard counsel for th| F'roin. perusal df ftie docft fhat fhe appUcation dated 27.11, fhe respondents and there is no] as suc& Uiere is no cause ot faing the petition. The petiuon i; it is accorttingly aisiuissed. (^onsequenUy M.W.K. No. ^iPtf?Izfr;T WRTf''tffei^ <iSrezR ^aTf^iTan^r |, counsel tbr fhe petitioner. j)ner is ttiat &e appnecl tor extension fhe respondents oa 27.11.2006, cousidered aad fherefore a suitable Uie respondents to consicter ttie ctension ot pei-init. peUtioner. tment ol Aanexure Jr'-^ it is eviaent ,]2006 is pending consicleration belbre ladverse order against uie petitioner, available witti tne pettuoner tor Uieretore tiable to De uisimssecl and act&on 57/2007 also stands disniissed. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge P.T.O. ^