CWP No.16305 of 2007 -: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.16305 of 2007 Date of decision: January 29, 2009. Ravinder Kumar Jain ...Petitioner(s) v. Union Territory, Chandigarh & Anr. ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri Sandeep Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Rajiv Narain Raina, Advocate with Shri K.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the respondents. ORDER Surya Kant, J. - (Oral): The petitioner has moved an application for impleadment of certain persons as respondents to this writ petition. Having heard Learned Counsel for the parties for some time and on perusal of the material on record, it appears that there is a dispute regarding properties left behind by the deceased Puran Chand Jain, between his widow on one hand and some of his sons, including the petitioner, on the other hand. It further appears that some of the properties were transferred by the Estate Officer in favour of widow of Puran Chand Jain on CWP No.16305 of 2007 -: 2 :- the basis of a civil court decree and/or Will executed by the deceased. Based upon the said transfer of title, it is the conceded position that Smt. Trilok Sundri, widow of Puran Chand Jain, has disposed of all the properties and, thus, third party rights have also been created. This necessarily gives rise to more than one seriously disputed questions of fact, like:- (i) as to whether or not the private respondents are bona fide purchasers?; (ii) whether the Will executed by the deceased was genuine?; and (iii) what is the legal effect of the collusive decree suffered by the deceased, etc. In my considered view these questions cannot be effectively decided by this Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction. Consequently, this writ petition is dismissed, however, with liberty to the petitioner to initiate appropriate proceedings before an appropriate forum (like a civil suit) on the same cause of action, if so advised. January 29, 2009. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge