1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 420 OF 2010 (Shalikram Raghunathji Ramteke .v. State of Maharashtra and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri S.P. Palshikar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.S. Fulzele, AGP for the respondent No.1. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. 14TH JUNE, 2010. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. By this writ petition, the petitioner has impugned the order dated 29.06.2009 passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur, by which Review Application No. 12/2008 filed by the petitioner has been rejected. The petitioner's Original Application No. 71/2005 was dismissed by the Tribunal vide its order dated 25.11.2008. In the Original Application, the applicant/petitioner had prayed for grant of time bound promotion with effect from 27.03.1996 in stead of 28.03.1997. It appears that such promotion was denied to the petitioner in view of his Confidential Reports for the years 1995-96 and 1996-97. According to the petitioner, it was wrong since no such condition was prescribed in the Government Resolution dated 08.06.1995. We have perused the impugned order dealing with the aforementioned submission and for the reasons recorded therein, we do not find any merit in the writ petition challenging the order passed on the review application. It is pertinent to note that the petitioner has not challenged the basic order passed by the Tribunal dated 25.11.2008. Moreover, this Court is informed that the petitioner was granted promotion in the subsequent year. In view thereof, we do not find any substance in the writ petition warranting any interference in writ jurisdiction under 2 Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Hence, the petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE *rrg.