IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16836 of 2010 WAKIL MIYA, Son of Jamil Akhtar, resident of Village- Sahpur, P.S. Khodawanpur, District- Begusarai.........................................Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR.................................................Opposite Party. with Cr.Misc. No.11751 of 2010 LALJI PASWAN, Son of Late Bindeshwar Paswan, resident of Village- Gobindpur, P.S. Rosera, District- Samastipur......................Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR......................................................Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 25.05.2010. Both the aforementioned Criminal Miscellaneous applications arise out of the same F.I.R. hence it is being disposed off by a common order. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioners are languishing in jail since October, 2009 in a case registered under Sections 324, 307 of the I. P. C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It is submitted that the petitioner Wakil Miya was named by one Anil Kumar Singh but neither any recovery has been made from possession of the petitioner Wakil Miya nor he was put on T. I. Parade though he is involved in one other case in which he is on bail. Moreover, the injury of the informant has been found to be simple. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner Lalji Paswan that his name sprang 2 up on the statement of the spy but from his possession also nothing has been recovered though he was identified by the informant but that too after much delay of his arrest in the case. The petitioner Lalji Paswan has no criminal antecedent. The aforesaid submissions have not been controverted by the learned A.P.P. Mr. Dinesh Singh who made the submissions after going through the case diary. Considering the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners for the purposes of bail only, let the petitioners, Wakil Miya and Lalji Paswan, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Though) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Rosera, Samastipur, in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No. 130 of 2007. If the petitioners fail to appear for three consecutive dates during trial, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioners. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)