1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No.4062/2011 Hindvi Swarajya Shikshan Sanstha, Wardha and another Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr. S. V. Sohoni, Adv. for the petitioners. Mrs. Dangre, Addl. G.P. for respondents 1 to 3. CORAM : D.D.SINHA & A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : 15/12/2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Additional Government Pleader for respondents 1 to 3. Communication dated 14.3.2011 issued by the Deputy Director of Education to the Principal/Head Master, Agriculture Higher Secondary School, Wardha whereby it is informed that the benefits as per decision dated 10th March, 2010 given by the Deputy Director of Education, Nagpur, were not extended to respondent no.4 and, therefore, three days time was given to the petitioner-Sanstha in this regard, failing which the Principal is informed that the salary grant of both the schools will be stopped. Counsel for the petitioner states that all the benefits, which were required to be extended as per the said decision to respondent no.4 - Ku. Shobha Khodke were already extended and, therefore, impugned communication is bad in law. 2 Considering the issue involved, we dispose of the petition with liberty to the petitioner to make representation in this regard to the Deputy Director of Education. If such representation is made, we direct the Deputy Director of Education to consider the same and pass an order accordingly within a period of three weeks from the date of representation. Steno copy is granted. JUDGE JUDGE Ambulkar.