IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J W.P.NOs.11536 and 11537 OF 2006 DATED 13-06-2006 BETWEEN Syed Nizamuddin Beedi Manufacturers Private Limited, Essen Tobacco Beedi Manufacturers Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Manager, Ameen Mohammed Shareef. .. PETITIONER And Smt.Mahamooda Bee and three others. …RESPONDENTS W.P.NO.11537 OF 2006 Syed Nizamuddin Beedi Manufacturers Private Limited, Essen Tobacco Beedi Manufacturers Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Manager, Ameen Mohammed Shareef. .. PETITIONER And Smt.Mahamooda Bee and three others. …RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J WRIT PETITION NOS.11536 & 11537 OF 2006 COMMON ORDER:(per Sri BPR.J) Heard Sri Syed Sharif Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri RN Reddy, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of respondents 2 and 3 and at their request, the matters are taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. Since common question is involved in both the writ petitions, they are being disposed of by this common order. Admittedly, as against the impugned orders passed by the District Forum, Kurnool, a regular statutory appeal is provided for under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act,1996. In view of the effective alternative remedy available to the petitioners against the impugned orders passed by the District Forum, we are not inclined to entertain these writ petitions. They are accordingly dismissed giving liberty to the petitioners to approach the appellate authority within a period of two weeks from today. Office is directed to return the original orders passed by the District Forum filed by the petitioners in these writ petitions forthwith. B.PRAKASH RAO,J Dated 13.6.2006 RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J