IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE SATURDAY, THE 18TH AUGUST 2007 / 27TH SRAVANA 1929 CRP.No. 652 of 2005() --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 08/04/2005 IN EP 1416/04 IN OS.1798/2001 of PRL.M.C.,IRINJALAKUDA .................... REVN. PETITIONERS: DECREE HOLDERS 1 TO 7, 9 AND 10 --------------------------------- 1. PARU, W/O.AYYAPPAN, RESIDING AT NEDUMBAL DESOM, THOTTIPPAL VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. NARAYANAN, S/O.AYYAPPAN, RESIDING AT DO. DO. 3. KRISHNAN, S/O.AYYAPPAN, RESIDING AT DO. DO. 4. VALSALA, D/O.AYYAPPAN, RESIDING AT DO. DO. 5. PARU, W/O.SANKARAN THEKKINIYEDATH, RESIDING AT DO. DO. 6. SASI, S/O.SANKARAN, RESIDING AT DO. DO. 7. MINI, D/O.SANKARAN, RESIDING AT SREENARAYANAPURAM VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 8. AMMINI, D/O.AYYAPPAN, RESIDING AT NEDUMBAL DESOM, THITTIPPAL VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 9. RADHA, D/O.AYYAPPAN, RESIDING AT NEDIKKARA DESOM, PARAPPUKARA VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.P.KELU NAMBIAR (SR.) SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR SRI.P.G.RAJAGOPALAN CRP.652/05 RESPONDENTS: JUDGMENTS DEBTORS. ------------------------------- 1. BHASKARAN, S/O.THEKKINIYEDATH ACHUTHAN RESIDING AT NEDUMBAL DESOM, THOTTIPPAL VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. RAMACHANDRAN, S/O.ACHUTHAN, RESIDING AT DO. DO. 3. SUNDARAN, S/O.ACHUTHAN, RESIDING AT DO. DO. 4. SULOCHANA, D/O.ACHUTHAN, RESIDING AT DO. DO. 5. SHEEJA, D/O.ACHUTHAN, RESIDING AT EAST OF KOPRAKALAM, CHANDRAPPINNI VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. R1 BY ADV.SRI.G.SREEKUMAR. THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: I.A.1778/05 IN CRP.NO.652/05 DISMISSED. 18.8.2007 SD/-PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. /TRUE COPY/ PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. .......................................................... C.R.P.No.652 OF 2005 ........................................................... DATED THIS THE 18th AUGUST, 2007 ORDER In view of the subsequent event of the petitioners-decree- holders withdrawing from the Execution Petition itself, the Civil Revision Petition will stand closed. The merits of the grounds raised herein will be adjudicated in the event of any execution petition being filed in future. (PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE) tgl