.tte—- ^ ^.l?-;-;.^ SfeS^ IN<THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION N0. [ff^/ /2006 Artidas Manikpuri, S/o- Late Bhuneshwar Das Manikpuri, Aged about 35 years, R/o- Village - Piparkhar, Tehsil - Dondi Lohaii}., Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh. PETITIONER VERSUS O' 2. 3. 5. State ofChattisgarh, Tta'ough-Secretary, Deptt. OfGeneralAdministratioa, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Secretary, Deptt. ofEducation, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, CG. State ofMadhya Pradesh, Through-Secretary, Genera Admimstration Deptt., Secretariat- Bhopal, M.P. District Education OfBcer, Durg,Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh. Unionofladia, Throgh-Du-ector, Departmemt ofPersonnel, Traming and Public Grievances, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, NewDelhi. RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FQR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI ETC. I-HC-22 •3~5| •^IJ-lld'4, ^Til'y'iri, 'Mclltiy tO-y-^6. 1<Z^/- •OT, SII^T^! h-u't s^; grtfwgfiti f^-1^1 ^ y/ -^.\k an^r'SWilwgfttT 1S-1-200S peti^ioner 2b- Stslte Petitionerby Shri Paakaj Sliri Vivek Sharma, Panel Shri S.K. Beriwal, Sr. Panel Wifh consent, heaid finally. This case relates to coiapassf deafh of an einployee serviug in the Leamed counsel for fhe of the eaiployee has occurred ou earlier. It is furfher subniitted No. 1322/2002 involvmg the same Court on 20/12/2005. He prays case also. Learaed couasel for fhc states that the State ot' Chhattiss cases of dependaats of those strictiy iti accordance with the subinits that four inonths tiine for In view of fhe subinissions parties, without expiTessing any opiaion ofthis Court, ends ofjustijc fhe State of Chhattisgarh and fh^ decide the case of fhe petitioner iri the time of deafh of the einpkiyee appointment orders wfll be issued 3 lrt May, 2006. The petitioner is tiie authorities. It is inade clearl petitiouer inay avail the reinedy the petition before fhis Court. Wifh the aforesaid observatiofas, Certified copy as per rules. Copy to fhe State couiisel, order to fhe respondents for coinpli^n' Shrtvastava, Advocate. La^er, for fhe State/respondents. L^wyer for the Union of India. i^onate appoiatatent consequent upon fhe IState. -. • categoricaUy stated fhat, the death l-2-2000 i.e. after l-11-1997andnot Ifhat in batch of cases beariag W.P. jiuestioii orders have begn passed by Qiis Ipiat similar orders inay be passed iu this Ot) ^F^f^Ffi^ ^wvli ^ ^^t '^^r? ^3ti5(ii[3nt?T Estrh em^loyees p<tlicy ntade does not dlspute the above fact and has taken a decision to consider the who died on or after 1/11/1997 prevalent at that tune. He however ^ssuiag necessary orders luay be given. by leamed counsel appeariug for the o^inion on the inerits of the case, ia the ;eWiU be served if a direGtioa is giveu to aufhonties concemed to consider and accordance wifh the policy prevalent at cJ3ncemed. If the petitioner found eli^ible, early as possible preferably on or before directed to render due co-operation to that tf any grievance stiU reuiaiiis, the a^ailable under fhe law iacludiag filing of as sdso ., this petition staads disposed of. who wffl be obUged to cooimuiucate the ance. _..__^- Sd'- Fakhruddin Judge [~^ ^Ftsi^