WP(C) 2814/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR RS GARG HON’BLE MR JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY With the consent of the parties the matter is finally disposed of. Heard Mr JP Das, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr J Singh, lear ned counsel for the respondents. At the very outset the learned counsel for the respondents submitted tha t the impugned order dated 16-03-2010 has been passed by a single Member of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Guwahati Bench, while in accordance with the ju risdictional roster, the matter should have been heard and decided by a Division Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal. His submission is that because of the jurisdictional flaw the order impugned may be set aside and the matter may be remanded to the Tribunal to decide the same in accordance with law. The learn ed counsel for the petitioner concedes to the position. In accordance with the submissions jointly made by the parties, the orde r impugned is hereby set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Central Ad ministrative Tribunal to decide the matter afresh in accordance with law, by a B ench which is competent to hear the matter. The parties present before us shall appear before the Tribunal on 07-06- 2010 and shall file a copy of this order before the Tribunal enabling the Tribun al to decide the matter in accordance with law, preferably within three months f rom the date of appearance of the parties.