IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38496 of 2010 VIJAY RAY Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 3 21.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Special Case No. P.S. Case No. 7 of 2009 arising out of Fatuha P.S. Case No. 38 of 2009 registered under sections-20 & 22 of the of the NDPS Act. Admittedly, nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner and the name of this petitioner came in the confessional statement of co-accused, Gyanchand Ram who disclosed that the Ganza belonged to petitioner but the police reported that except the present case, the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent in his credit. Furthermore, it would appear from perusal of the case diary that except the aforesaid co-accused, none of the person has stated about the involvement of the petitioner in the alleged crime. Considering the facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, the petitioner, namely, Vijay Ray is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount - 2 - each in connection with Special Case No. P.S. Case No. 7 of 2009 arising out of Fatuha P.S. Case No. 38 of 2009 to the satisfaction of Sessions Judge, Patna. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)