IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 13007 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.08.2011 Kulwant ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Ms. Avinash Mandla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Godara, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. ..... RAJESH BINDAL, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has neither been named in the FIR nor was arrested on the spot. Thirty seven kilograms of poppy husk was recovered from Suresh Kumar, who was arrested on the spot. In the disclosure statement Suresh Kumar stated that the car is owned by the petitioner and he had purchased poppy husk from Rajasthan and handed over the same to the petitioner. He got down from the car at Siwani. In fact, the petitioner is not the owner of the car and has no concern with Suresh Kumar, who has been arrested. He has already joined investigation. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Ranbir Singh, submitted that the registration certificate of the car was found in the name of Suman Kumar son of Amar Nath resident of Kabir Basti, Gaziabad. However, on inquiry, it was found that he was not the owner of the car. He never purchased this vehicle. Name of the petitioner was disclosed by the person, who was arrested on the spot. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid materials, in my opinion, interim bail granted to the petitioner on May 18, 2011 deserves to be confirmed. Ordered accordingly. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 12.08.2011 sharmila