IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.8148 of 2005 Between: Mirza Yaseen Ali Baig S/o Mirza Hadi Ali Baig, r/o 12-2-37/B3, Muradnagar Mehdipatnam, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER AND 1 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Shaikpet Mandal, Hyderabad District. 2 Station House Officer, Banjara Hills Police Station, Hyderabad. 3 Sub-Registrar Ameerpet, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the first respondent in not directing the police to Protect the land from encroachers namely Mr. P. Laxmaiah Mr. Muthyal, Mr. Saleem and others as illegal, unconstitutional and violative or 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the first respondent to instruct the 2nd respondent to protect the land in survey No. 86, 87, 88 89 and 90 of Hakeempet Village correlated to T.S. No. 7 and 10/1 Block-B, war No. 12 of Hakeempet Village, T.S. No. part, T.S. No. 10/1 and T.S. No. 10/3 part Block-B ward No. 12 extent 66, 279-76 sq. mts., and ensure that the lands are not sold to any and pass such other order or orders in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.RAMAKANTH REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.8148 of 2005 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the first respondent in not directing the Police to protect the land from encroachers namely Mr.P.Laxmaiah, Mr.Muthyalu, Mr.Saleem and others as illegal, unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and for a consequential direction to the first respondent to instruct the second respondent to protect the land in Survey Nos.86, 87, 88, 89 and 90 of Hakeempet Village correlated to T.S.Nos.7 and 10/1, Block-B, Ward No.12 of Hakeempet Village, T.S.No.7 part, T.S.No.10/1 and 10/3 part, Block-B, Ward No.12 extent 66,279-76 square meters. At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Writ Petition has become infructuous. In view of the submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to the dismissal of the Writ Petition, W.P.M.P.No.10795 of 2005 is also dismissed as infructuous. _______________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 12th June 2008 RRB