IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 3RD APRIL 2009 / 13TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 10944 of 2009(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ ABU THAHIR, AGED 27 YEARS, S/O. ALIKUTTY, PUTHENPEEDIKAYIL, VADANAM KURISSI AMSOM, DESOM.P.O, VADANAAM KURISSI, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH SUBRAMANIAN SRI.E.A.THANKAPPAN SRI.SHERRY J. THOMAS SRI.S.SREEKUMAR(NORTH PARAVUR) RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OTTAPPALAM. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, PALAKKAD. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/04/2009, ALONG WITH WPC NO. 10987, 11015, 11027, 11053 AND 11060/09, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NOs. 10944, 10987, 11015, 11027, 11053 & 11060 OF 2009 ========================= Dated this the 3rd day of April, 2009 J U D G M E N T Ext.P1 in WP(C) Nos.11015, 11027 & 11060/09 and Ext.P2 in WP(C) Nos.10987 and 11053/09 and Ext.P3 in WP(C) No.10944/09 are the applications made by the petitioners before the Revenue Divisional Officer seeking permission for conversion of the lands mentioned therein in terms of the provisions contained in the Kerala Land Utilization Order. Orders have not been passed by the RDO and therefore the writ petitions have been filed. 2. Taking into account the above grievance, I direct the Revenue Divisional Officer to consider Exts.P1, P2 and P3 referred to above, if the same have been received and are pending, in the light of the law as laid down by this Court in Jayakrishnan v. District Collector and others (2008(4) KHC 514). Orders shall be passed as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 8 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petitions are disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp