IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 4TH MARCH 2010 / 13TH PHALGUNA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 155 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WA.2268/1997 Dated 11/04/2001 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- ANTONY JOE KINGSLEY FERNANDEZ, AGED 68 YEARS, S/O.F.M.FERNANDEZ, RESIDING AT KALLUVEETTIL, SHYRES GARDEN, 46, CHIDAMBARANATHAN STREET, R.V.PURAM, NAGERCOIL, TAMILNADU. BY ADV. SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.N.M.MADHU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. M.R.UNNI (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN) REGISTRAR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM.) 2. RAJAN GURUKKAL (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN) VICE CHANCELLOR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM. BY SC SRI. T.A. SHAJI THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMAN, Ag. C.J. & C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------- Cont. of Court Case No. 155 OF 2010 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of March, 2010 JUDGMENT Raman, Ag. C. J. This Contempt Petition is filed alleging non-compliance of Annexure A judgment. As per Annexure A judgment, after setting aside the order passed by the Vice Chancellor, the University was directed to pass appropriate orders and left open all the contentions raised by the appellant in the Writ Appeal. The complaint of the petitioner is that University has not passed orders. Standing counsel appearing for the University has produced before us the fax message received from the University informing that decision has been taken by the University and the decision is to the following effect: The University is willing to honour the sale deed by paying the balance consideration, i.e., Rs. 50 lakhs only to be paid as agreed earlier. As there is no legal heir proved beyond doubt by a competent court, the amount can be entrusted to the State if order to that effect is issued by the Court. The delay in this case was on account of factors beyond the control of the University. The rival claimants including the C0C 155/2010 2 petitioner in the contempt case are not prepared to produce the order of the court to substantiate their claim of rightful heirship to the estate of the deceased, Fr. Cyriack Puthenpura. Standing counsel submitted that copy of the order will be served by the respondent on the petitioner within two weeks from today. In the above circumstances, Contempt case is closed. (P.R. RAMAN) Ag. Chief Justice (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) Judge. kk C0C 155/2010 3