IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. Nos.29527, 29568,30199, & 30570, all of 2010 MANJU KUMARI, D/O RAM ASHISH SINGH, R/O VILLAGE- EHADOKHARA, P.S. TILAUTHU, DISTRICT-ROHTAS, AT PRESENT PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, TILAUTHU, P.S. TILATHU, DISTRICT-ROHTAS. --PETITIONER (In Cr.Misc. 29527/2010) KUMARI ANITA DEVI, W/O AWADHESH SAH, R/O INDRAPURI, RAJA BAZAR, P.S. TILAUTHU, DISTRICT-ROHTAS. --PETITIONER (In Cr.Misc. 29568/2010) Smt. ANJU KUMARI D/O SHEOMUNI SINGH, W/O SHRI SHANKAR DAYAL SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-NAUGAI, P.S. DARIGAON, DISTRICT- ROHTAS, AT PRESENT R/O VILLAGE-TILAUTHU, P.O. & P.S. TILAUTHU, DISTRICT-ROHTAS. --PETITIONER (In Cr.Misc. 30199/2010) Smt. LALITA SINHA, W/O CHANDRA SHEKHAR, ASHA WORKER, PHC, TILAUTHU, DISTRICT-ROHTAS, PRESENTLY R/O BABUGANJ, P.S. TILAUTHU, DISTRICT-ROHTAS --PETITIONER (In Cr.MiSC. 30570/2010) Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --OPP.PARTY (In all four Cases ) 2 22.09.2010 Since all the four petitions arises out of same case, it is being heard and disposed of by this composite order. All four petitioners are named accused in this case being employees connected with Primary Health Centre, 2 Tilouthu, Sasaram, carry allegation that in order to take undue advantage they have got names of the pregnant ladies registered in the register of hospital showing their delivery therein though the ladies delivered their child outside the Health Centre, i.e., at their respective residence or at private clinic of other doctor. However, as it appears, the money prescribed for such ladies delivering child could not be paid to them since the irregularities came into light. Remaining one co-accused appears granted the privilege by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 02nd July, 2010 in Cr.Misc. no. 22090 of 2010. Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, are directed to be enlarged on bail on each of them furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram, in Sasaram (Tilauthu) P.S. Case no. 302 of 2010, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, with additional condition that the petitioners shall remain present before the court below on 3 each and every date for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier. If the petitioners fail to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad