IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 4628 of 2008. Decided on 8th September, 2010. _____________________________________________________ Jodh Vir. …Petitioner. -Versus- H.P. State Electricity Board and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): The case of the petitioner, in a nut-shell, is that he has completed 240 days in a block of twelve calendar months, however, he has been retrenched without complying with the principles of natural justice. Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, learned counsel for the respondents has drawn the attention of the Court to the mandays chart placed on record. A bare perusal of the mandays chart reveals that the petitioner has not completed 240 days in a calendar year preceding his retrenchment. Accordingly, there is nothing wrong with the termination of the petitioner. 2. Consequently, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge September 08, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?