IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-46755 of 2007 (O&M) Date of decision: 1.7.2009 Subhash Kumar and another .. Petitioners v. State of Punjab and another .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. H.R. Nohria, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Anter Singh Brar, Sr. DAG, Punjab for respondent No. 1. Mr. H. N. S. Gill, Advocate for respondent No. 2. .. Rajesh Bindal J. Learned counsel for the parties are not in dispute that the petitioners have been discharged in the complaint filed against them in the trial court. However, the complainant is in revision before the learned Additional Sessions Judge against the order of discharge. In view of this development, at this stage, the present petition seeking quashing of the complaint has been rendered infructuous. Ordered accordingly. However, it is made clear that in case the order of discharge is set aside and the complaint is restored, the petitioners would be at liberty to seek revival of the present petition. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 1.7.2009 mk