^"^'^^ •'T^ ^-\^]^ Dlvlsslorii Bwi rBefore Hon'ble Division Benchl IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT APPEALNo. \(s5 / 2010 APPELLANT ;&i-j^;.^"^N ^; "tF?1—. ^'•./.--.-^s"?^ 7 .^•.. '..^' RESPONDENTS '<'.••' ^ ^wy <>.• ^' '^~' 'e1 ^' ARUN KUMAR YADAV S/o Shri. Shyam Lal Yadav, Aged about 45 Years, Employed as Conductor (W/C) Office ofthe Executive Engineer, E&M, L/M, Tubewell and Gate Division, Water Resources Department, Raipur, Residing at: Khushalpur, RAIPUR (CG) VERSUS ^l. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Water Resources Department, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, RAIPUR- 492001 (CG) ^2. The Engineer-in Chief Water Resources Department, Sihawa Bhawan, Civil Lines, RAIPUR-49200KCG) ^ 3. The Chief Engirieer, (Mahanadi Godawari Basin) Water Resources Department, S.R.P.Chowk, ShankarNagarRoad, RAJPUR-492001(CG) 4. The Executive Engineer, E&M, L/M, Tubewell & Gate Div. No.l, Water Resources Department, RAIPUR- 492001 (CG) ^-5. The Divisioaal Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts & Pension, City Treasury Office, G.E.Road, Ghadi Chowk, RAIPUR- 492001(CG) /6. The Sub-Divisional Officer, E&M, L/M, Tubewell & Gate Div. No.l, Water Resources Department, RAIPUR- 492001 (CG) ^' 1. The Additional Director, Directorate ofTreasury, Accounts & Pension, Chhattisgarh, RAIPUR-492001(CG) !»l-!j;! 'K WRIT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2 OF THE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT (APPEAL TO DIVISION BENCH) ACT,2006 .linif,, ^i-it^^i't^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR APPELLANT WRIT APPEAL N0. 165/2010 Arun Kuraar Yadav RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh and others DB:- HON'BLE SHRI I.M. QUDDUSI & HON'BLE SHRI N.K. AGARWAL, JJ PRESENT: Shri B.P. Rao, Adv. for the appellant. Shri G.D. Wasvani, Govt. Adv. for the State. ORAL ORDER (5-7-2010) 1. This writ appeal has been filed against the order dated 5-5- 2010 passed in W.P.(S) No. 5114/2008 whereby learned Single Judge has disraissed the writ petition. 2. The petitioner earlier filed Writ Petition (S) No. 4117/2008 for the same relief which has been sought in the W.P.(S) I'io. 5114/2008, which was dismissed vide order dated 30-7- 2008. Further another writ petition bearing W.P. (S) I'Jo. 4397/2008 was Gled for the same reUef which was dismisiied as withdrawn vide order dated 28-8-2008. Thereafter third writ petition was filed registered as W.P. (S) No. 5114/2008, which was dismissed as not maintainable by the impugned order. 3. Once the appellant has agitated the grievance by filing a vTit petition and earlier no opportunity was taken to file a frc'sh petition, we cannot say that the impugned order passed by learned Single Judge is not sustainable in the eye of law. 4. The writ appeal is misconceived and the same is dismissed in limine. ,-^i' Sdl- I.M. Quddusi Judge Sd/- . N.K.AgrawaI Judge ^---.