IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45809 of 2008 1. SIYARAM MAHTO 2. KAMAL MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03/ 20-01-2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are accused in a case under Sections 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the entire case is false and baseless. Actually the victim died in course of treatment as a result of excessive bleeding. On the other hand, case diary would go to show that the charge sheet has already been submitted. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to release petitioner no. 1, Siyaram Mahto who is the husband of the victim lady. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is hereby rejected for the present. So far the case of petitioner no. 2 Kamal Mahto is concerned, he is father-in-law of victim. Main allegation is against the husband of the victim. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner no. 2, namely, Kamal Mahto is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Town (Rahika) P.S. Case No. 341 of 2008 corresponding to G.R. No. 2003 of 2008. S.Sb/- (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)