IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-24545 of 2010 Date of Decision: 01.09.2010 Sushil Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & Ors. ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Navjeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for issuance of direction to respondent No.2 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner from the hands of respondent No.3 at the instance of respondent No.4 and her family members. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that earlier two enquiries were initiated against the petitioner but nothing was found against him. Now, the third enquiry has been initiated against him and, therefore, he fears threat to his life and liberty. Heard. The fact that a third enquiry is marked does mean that his life and liberty is threatened. Hence, there is no threat perception. Dismissed. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 01.09.2010 JUDGE gurpreet