Page No.Q- IN THE HIOH COURT OF CHHATTISGAKH AT BILASPUR M. C. C. N0. r't32-^ /2005 Singl APPLICANTS 4-PPELLANTS ^ :1. </ Smt. Jayanti Widow of Liti Muriya, Agriculturist, at present aged about 58 years, 2. Sukman S/o Liti Muriya, Agriculturist, at present aged about 38 years, 3. Dasmu S/o Liti Moriya, Agriculturist, at present aged about 36 years, AU are R/o ViUage Karanji, TahsU Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G-). VERSUS NON-APPUCANTS RESPONDENTS : ly Gopinafh S/o Gobaru ( Muriya, Agriculturist, at present aged about 62 years, 2, Samnath S/o Gobaru Muriya, Agriculturist, at present aged about 58 years, ^s/> (2) 3. Smt. Subri Widow of Ramnath Muriya, at present aged about 51 years, 4. ~vf i Lachhu S/o Ramnath Munya, at present aged about 16 years, a minor through natural guardian mother Siut. Subri widow of Ramnafh Muriya, AU are R/o village Karanji, TahsU Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar(C.G.). .^' y^PLICATION UNDER ORDER 41 RULE 19 OF C.P.C. FOR RE-ADMISSION OF APPEAL DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT R'l'|!—^ Xi-HC-22 an^r^ h-i sn^y ^•H --sf?<1 'tl d^ ^[TTi^p?, CT^lTWlS, isiWW^ ^ti^^'i ^i5i^ ..£:..C..-..^ .^SJ's^ "wr-t3«3" ftre^s 31T^I'SWIWHltTT .li^s7 l"'^ ^S^^-ii^ Shri Manoj Mishra, teamed . ' Ths appellants have preferi| Appeal No. 897/98 as the same 'j a'ated 15.02.2005 fornon prosscui Heard on M.C.P. No. '!590< Limitation Act. rilei isei ^<^ •?^; icaEion lor c<! appllcation supported Vi"th an fiiing this application for restoratior For the reasons indicated aliowed. The^elay in fiiing appiicai Learned.cpunse1 for fhe apj Appeal was fiied before'the High| counsei. However afte.r formati^ Bilaspur, no notice '.vas'given to case -n-om Jabalpur to High Court that from perusal ofths erder dat' directed to be issued on.18.01.2Q has been issued to.the'appeliantsl dismissa! of the apDeal on 17.0S ^Uhftfc"''' Tahslidar in thep&rtteari proceedin "/y" '"•""""" Taking into consideration th appllcation wiiich is supported by s appncation^js ailowed snd jt is dire. be restored to its orid'nal number. • ^r^^li! ^iH^ii ^ 'f^et <Pn^iJ i73lfiW3n^! sd this appeat for restoration of Se •secona 'a;£'i<*J ^n,\i 4' aii~- .^'^fir^ ts\i^^\ ^i.yii'i. 'U UV ll'HS; '^UU[t V)Uc OI.'C'SI innc. . )5 application under Section 5 ofthe sliants submits thatthe apoeiiantshave ndonation of deiay in prefsring this davit as there is deiay of 178 days in under Order41 Ru!e 19'ofthe CPC. in the said appiication, the same is :ian for restoration is condoned. )ejlants subinits that the instant Sscond Courf of M.P. at Jabalpur throuah the 'n of High Court of Chhattsigarii at he appeilants' regarding tranafer of the of C.G. at Bilaspur and •Mrthsr submits sd 15.02.2005 it apoears that SPC was i5 to ihe1 appellants however no notics in this regard and thev.ieamt about the 2005 •a*en they attended the.Court of e overail circumstances narrated in this in affidavit ofappeliant No.2, the instant ;ted that the Second Aaoeai No. 897;98 Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ^ ^ '-^