IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 2ND MARCH 2009 / 11TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 6536 of 2009(J) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------- 1. DR.T.C.JAMES,S/O.CHACKO,AGED 54 YRS, THERAKATHINKAL HOUSE, THALAYAD POST,KOYILANDY TALUK,KOZHI-KODE DISTRICT. 2. T.C.SHIRLY JAMES, W/O.DR.T.C.JAMES, AGED 49 YRS,THERAKATHINKAL HOUSE,THALAYAD POST, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.T.MADHAVANUNNI SRI.V.A.SATHEESH RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,KUTTIADY EXTENSION SCHEME DIVISION, KAKKAYAM, KOZHIKODE. 2. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REP; BY ITS SECRETARY,VAIDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,DEPARTMENT OF POWER, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 6536 OF 2009 (J) ==================== Dated this the 2nd day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioners submit that out of 5 acres and 40 cents of land, which they held in Athyodi amsom in Koorachundu Village of Koyilandy Taluk, 2 acres have been acquired by the respondents for the purpose of Kuttiadi Additional Extension Scheme. It is stated that in view of this, they were not in a position to enjoy the remaining portion of the properties and therefore they submitted various representations requesting the 2nd respondent to acquire the remaining portion also . It is stated that finally at the request of the 1st respondent, they have even submitted a sketch of the remaining land. The complaint in this writ petition is that despite all this, a final decision on their request has not been taken by the 1st respondent. 2. If as stated by the petitioners, they have represented to the 1st respondent for acquisition of the remaining portion of their extent and a final decision has not been taken, it is directed that within 6 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment, the 1st respondent shall take a final decision on the request made by the petitioners. WPC 6536/09 :2 : Petitioners may produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the 1st respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp