FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of | coram, appearance, court’s orders |Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders | WRIT PETITIONS NO.6924 6925/2010 Shri S.P.Brahme,Adv.for petitioner. Shri K.M.Suryawanshi ,AGP for R-State ... CORAM : B.R.GAVAI & A.A.SAYED,JJ. DATE : 20/10/2010. 1] The petitioner challenges the termination order. However, the basic grievance of the petitioner is that the termination order issued by the Corporation is without following the principles of natural justice. 2] Respondent-Municipal Council has realized its mistake and has stated to have withdrawn the termination order. An affidavit to that effect is already placed on record. 3] In that view of the matter, Petitions have served their purpose and Petitions are therefore,disposed of accordingly. 4] Needless to state that as consequence to the withdrawal of termination order, petitioner would be reinstated with consequential benefits. 5] Needless to state that the withdrawal of the termination would not come in the way of the respondent- Municipal Council in taking appropriate proceedings, if permissible in law. (A.A.SAYED) (B.R.GAVAI) JUDGE JUDGE umg/wp6924-10