The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.28259 of 2011 Date: 18.10.2011 Between: B.Lakshmi Bai ..... Petitioner AND The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, (GHMC) rep. by its Commissioner, Tank Bund, Hyderabad and 4 others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.N.M.Krishnaiah Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3: Mr.Santosh Kumar for Mr.C.Damodar Reddy, SC for GHMC Counsel for respondent Nos.4 & 5: ----- The Court made the following: Order: In this Writ Petition, the grievance of the petitioner is that her objection petition, dated 10-06-2011, submitted to the Commissioner of respondent No.1- Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, is not being considered. The petitioner pleaded that respondent Nos.4 and 5 encroached upon the 18 feet public road and made an application for regularisation of the plot under Layout Regularisation Scheme; that by Order, dated 22-06-2009, the application of respondent Nos.4 and 5 was rejected, questioning which they have filed W.P.No.15806 of 2010. While the said Writ Petition is pending, respondent Nos.3 and 4 have, allegedly, approached respondent No.1 again for reconsideration of the earlier order. The petitioner is stated to have submitted her objection on 10-06-2011 to the said application of respondent Nos.3 and 4. Apprehending that respondent No.1 may review his earlier decision and regularise occupation of respondent Nos.4 and 5 over the public road in question, the petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition. On the petitioner’s own showing, so far, respondent No.1 has not taken any decision on the application of respondent Nos.4 and 5 for reconsideration of the earlier decision. As the petitioner has already submitted her objection, respondent No.1 is bound to consider the same before disposal of the application of respondent Nos.4 and 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.1 to consider the petitioner’s objection, if already received by him, before taking a decision on the purported application of respondent Nos.3 and 4 for reconsideration of Order, dated 22-06-2009. Subject to the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.34889 of 2011, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 18th October, 2011 LUR