IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.30119 of 2011 Dhrub Yadav, son of Brahmdeo Yadav @ Bramhi Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 3. 15.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 4.3.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. 45810 of 2009 since the allegation against his was that he was forcibly looted wheat of the Informant and also because of his antecedent. The prayer for bail has been renewed on the ground of undue delay in trial. A report was called for from the Trial Court which reveals that unfortunately the trial is not proceeding without any fault of the petitioner. Considering the same, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Sri A.K. Pandey, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Naugachia, Distt. Bhagalpur, in connection with Bhipur (Bhawanipur) P.S. Case No. 164 of 2006, subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other shall be the brother of the petitioner namely Jarmani Yadav. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if 2 there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner shall be physically present on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail shall stand automatically cancelled. In view of the antecedents of the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Bhagalpur, within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and every two weeks thereafter for the next six months. The conduct of the petitioner will be kept under watch in this period by the Superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the petitioner before the court concerned. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)