IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16374 of 2010 1. ANTIMA KUMARI, DAUGHTER OF YADO LAL SAH. 2. YADO LAL SAH.@ YADAV LAL SAH SON OF LATE YODHA SAH. 3. KRISHNA DEVI, WIFE OF YADO LAL SAH. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR. 2. MOTI LAL SAH, SON OF LATE BRIKSHA SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- JHAJHAWA, P.O. AND P.S. SINGHWALIA, DISTRICT- GOPALGANJ(BIHAR) ----------- 4. 11.02.2011 Notices were issued in this case to opposite party No. 2 the complainant, which have been validly served but complainant has not chosen to appear. The present application is on behalf of unmarried sister-in-law, father-in-law and mother- in-law of the complainant. It appears that marital distress started soon after the marriage. It is submitted that it was actuated by the fact that marriage was performed in respect of a different girl because upon marriage it was found that the girl was blind in both her eyes, which was not disclosed earlier also another girl was shown. Be that as it may, in the event of arrest/surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order 2 petitioners, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Turkaulia P.S. Case No. 308 of 2009. Devendra/ ( Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)