THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No. 17372 of 2010 O R D E R: When this Writ Petition came before me on 21.07.2010, for consideration, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents has taken time to obtain instructions in the matter, as it is alleged in the affidavit that the 1st respondent has orally instructed the writ petitioner not to attend to duties as a Shift Operator in 33/11 KV Electrical Sub- station at Athaveedu in Prakasam District. The learned Standing Counsel, upon instructions, submits that the contract entered into with the writ petitioner is subsisting till the end of May 2011 and therefore, the question of the 1st respondent insisting upon the writ petitioner contractor not to attend to any duties of Shift Operator at 33/11KV Sub-station, would not arise. In fact, the 1st respondent would not be interfering with the work of the writ petitioner in supplying technically qualified manpower for functioning as Shift Operators in the sub-station. Objection, if any, would be raised only if the writ petitioner tries to engage the services of unqualified candidates, inasmuch as there will be risk not only to the property of the respondents, but to human lives as well. In view of this categorical statement made by the learned Standing Counsel, the apprehensions entertained by the writ petitioner contractor that he will not be allowed to operate the contract, which is subsisting in terms of the said contract, are put paid to. Therefore, the Writ Petition does not deserve to be admitted. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed at the admission stage. No costs. ---------------------------------- (NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J) 28th July 2010 ksld