IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.18295 of 2010 LALBABU SAH, S/O LATE LAKSHMAN SAH, R/O VILLAGE JAMSAR, P.S. UCHKAGAON, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ .. PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR .. OPPOSITE PARTY **** /3/ 07.07.2010 Heard the learned counsel for both the parties. 2. This application is for anticipatory bail for offence under Sections 420, 406, 504 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. There is allegation that Rs.1,25,000/- and passport were taken by the petitioner for sending the informant to Arab. An agreement has also taken in this regard. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the money was taken by the informant to purchase of golden chain and some jewellery with the assurance that the amount shall be paid and when the said amount was demanded by the petitioner, he has falsely been implicated. However, the order of the Session's Judge that the witnesses have stated in support of the prosecution case and the photo - 2 - stat copies of passport and agreement have also been filed and such type of offence is rampant in that area. 4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. 5. However, if the petitioner files a petition for regular bail that may be considered on it’s own merit without being prejudiced of this order. S.A. (Gopal Prasad, J. )