<7-^- lsr-3^__ IN THE HONBLE^HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER Non-applicant ^/°^° y'"^--"" ..•••* ^" ..-••" -••< \yj i <»••' Q.-' ,^^£\$v' '•*• ^:^ ^ -•••' W.P. (Q No.^^\ Of201o3sliGU Shri Tejram Dewangan, aged about 51 years, son of late Shri Heerasingh Dewangan, F>ujari and Sarvarakar Ma Mahamaya Devi Mandir Kumhari, R/o. Patelpara, Durga Chowk, Ward No.l, House No.l, Kumhari Tahsil Dhamdha District Durg (Chhattisgarh) RESPONDENTS Applicant' Versus If Shri Raj Sahu (wrongly written correct name is Raju Sahu) son of Shri Babulal Sahu, R/o. Shantinagar, Kumhari, Tahsil Dhamdha, District Durg (C.G.) :2) Sub Divisional Officer (R) Durg- Cum-Registrar, Public Trust G.E. Road, Durg (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA /o HIGH COIWT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Cl N0.24740F2010 Petitioner Resoondents Versus Shri T^ram Dewangan Shri Rq Sahu (wrongly written correct name is Raju Sahu) & Another WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon'bte Mr. SaHsh K.Agnihotri, J.) 1. 2. 3. 4. Present:- Shri H.B.Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Pragya Singh, Advocate for the petltioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for the Strte. ORDER<ORAL) (Passed on 27"* day of August, 2010) Learned counsel appearing for the peUtloner, seeks permission of thls Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse of alternative statutory forum that may be availabte under provlstons of law. Learned counsel further submits that in view of the facte, stetus quo in respect of the possession of the temple in question as obtained on 14-06-2010 may be permitted to continue for further period of two weeks from today. Leamed counsel appearing for respondert No.2 has no objection. Accordingly, the vwit petition is dismissed, as withdrawn with the aforestated liberty. State quo granted earlier on 14-06-2010 to continue for further period of two weeks only from today. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Ashok