IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40709 of 2008 RAGHAV RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.12.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Samastipur Town (Muffasil) P.S. Case No.277/2006 for the alleged offences registered under sections 302, 324, 326, 307 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is the father of Tribhuwan Rai, who is alleged to have killed the daughter of the informant. It is submitted that only allegation during the investigation has come to the effect that the petitioner is alleged to have conspired in the alleged killing. The learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the specific allegation of killing the daughter of the informant is on the part of co- accused Tribhuwan Rai. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner 2 above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Samastipur Town (Muffasil) P.S. Case No.277/2006 within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)