IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5507 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 23.9.2009 Amrit Kaur .....Petitioner versus Sanjeev Kumar Jain & others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Chetan Mittal, Senior Advocate, with Mr.Vishal Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This revision petition is directed by the petitioner-landlady against the order dated 6.8.2009, whereby the mesne profits at the current market rent of a triple storied SCF No.29 situated in Vegetable Market, Sector-26, Chandigarh, has been assessed by the Appellate Authority, Chandigarh @ Rs.6000/- per month. The mesne profits at the aforestated rate have been fixed in an appeal preferred by the respondent-tenant against the order of his eviction dated 7.3.2008 passed by the Rent Controller, Chandigarh. C.R. No.5507 of 2009 (O&M) 2 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the considered view that in stead of going into the question of the prevailing market rent of the demised premises and then determine the mesne profits, it would be more appropriate to direct the Appellate Authority, Chandigarh, to decide the appeal at the earliest, moreso when the petitioner has sought the eviction of the respondent-tenants on the ground of bonafide personal necessity. It may also be noticed that the eviction petition was filed in the year 1999. For the reasons aforestated and in the interest of justice, this revision petition is disposed of with a direction to the Appellate Authority, Chandigarh to decide the appeal preferred by the respondent-tenant as early as possible and preferably within 3 months from today. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 23-09-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE