FARAD CONTINUTION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Appeal From Order No.59 of 2006 with Civil Application no.ll48 of 2005 with Appeal From Order no. 60 of 2006 with Civil Application No.ll45 of 2005 -------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office Court or Judge’s Order Memorandum of Coram appearence,Court’s Orders & Directors and Registrar’s Order --------------------------------------------------- Mr Bharat Vaishnava for appellant CORAM; A.M.KHANWILKAR J. CORAM; A.M.KHANWILKAR J. CORAM; A.M.KHANWILKAR J. DATED 30.l.2006 DATED 30.l.2006 DATED 30.l.2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Both appeals are disposed of as the appellant intends to move the trial court by way of formal application that decree on admission be passed in the respective suits as he has no interest in the suit property. He is neither co-owner nor has any causal connection with the suit property. If such an application is filed the trial court may pass appropriate orders thereon and dispose of the suits on such terms as may be advised. .The only grievance of the appellant made before this court is that he has been named as defendant in both the suits even though he has no connection with the suit property and for that reason he should be compensated by way of litigation cost and damages for the mental harassment caused and time spent in attending the court proceedings. Even that prayer can be made before the trial court which will consider the same while passing appropriate orders in the suits on the basis of formal application to be filed by the appellant. . Both appeals as well as civil applications stand disposed of accordingly.