1 AO 461 OF 2006 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.461 OF 2006 Minoti S Anand .. Appellant -versus Subhash M. Anand and ors .. Respondents. Ms. Chandana Salgaonkar, for the Appellant. None for the respondents. CORAM: A. S. OKA, J. DATED: 13th April, 2011 P.C. 1. This appeal was finally heard on the last date. As none appeared for contesting first respondent, final order was not passed. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant has served private notice to the first respondent. Affidavit of Service tendered today is taken on record. 2. Learned counsel appearing for appellant prays that time granted under the impugned order for taking back plaint be extended. Learned counsel submitted that the appellant be permitted to delete the name of the second defendant in the suit while filing the plaint before the Family Court. The said request deserves to be accepted. Hence I pass the following order. ORDER I) The impugned judgment and order dated 20th 2 AO 461 OF 2006 June, 2006 is confirmed. However, time granted under the impugned order to take back plaint is extended by a period of six weeks from today. II) Before instituting the plaint before the appropriate Family Court, it will be open for the appellant to delete the name of the second defendant. III) To enable the appellant to take back plaint and to move the concerned Family Court for grant of appropriate relief, the ad interim order of status quo granted by this Court on 12th July, 2006 will continue to operate for a period of 12 weeks from today. (A.S. OKA, J.)