1 ao 41-2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 41 OF 2011 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2163 OF 2010 IN S.C. SUIT NO. 2513 OF 2010 M/s.Mehta Developers Through Mr.Jugaj Rathod ...Appellant vs. Ashok Amrutlal Shah & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Bharat L. Jain for the Appellant. Mr.Kunal Cheema for Respondent No.1. Mr.G.W. Mattos for Respondent No.6. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATED : JANUARY 17, 2011 P.C :- 1 The appellant challenges the ad-interim relief granted in favour of the respondent-plaintiff vide order dated 30th September, 2010. From the perusal of the order impugned, it appears that the Notice of Motion itself was made returnable on 15th October, 2010. 2 ao 41-2011 2 It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the appellant that though Notice of Motion is made returnable, the matter is not being heard by the learned trial court and as such, the appellants are being put to great loss. 3 Since the appellant challenges the ad- interim relief and since the replies have already been filed, I find that interest of justice would be met by directing the learned trial court to dispose of the Notice of Motion itself within six weeks from today. 4 Needless to state that the learned Judge would not be influenced by the observation made by him at the stage of grant of ad-interim relief and would decide the matter after considering the rival submissions. 5 Appeal is disposed of. In view of the 3 ao 41-2011 disposal of the appeal, nothing survives in the Civil Application. Same is also disposed of (B.R. GAVAI, J.)