1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APLICATION NO. 6322/2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 347/2003 Virbhadras/o Mahdappa Rachatte Vs. Annasaheb s/o Sitaram Deshmukh andanother Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. Anoop Patil h/f Mr. R.N. Dhorde, Advocate for applicant. Mrs. M.A. Kulkarni, Advocate for the respondents. PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2 The Courts below concurrently held that the appellant is entitled to specific performance of the suit agreement. The appellant claimed that he was also put in possession at the time of agreement. But this has not 2 been proved. It is held by the Courts below that the respondent no.1 had agreed to sell his undivided share in suit lands. It would be sufficient in the interest of justice to direct respondent no.1 not to alienate his undivided share in survey no. 148 of Ausa Dist. Latur. 3 Respondent no.1 shall not alienate or deal with his undivided share to the extent of 3 acres 3 gunthas of land Survey No.148 of village Ausa Dist. Latur till disposal of the appeal. 4 Civil Application disposed of. 16th June,2010 ( A.V.NIRGUDE,J. ) tsk/