THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.21769 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner is an employee borne on the cadre of the Group of Temples, Kothapadu Village, Sirivella Mandal, Kurnool District, respondent No.4 herein. Initially, he was appointed as an Attender in 1991 and thereafter, earned promotions as Record Assistant and Junior Assistant. Soon after promotion to the post of Junior Assistant, he was transferred to Sri Lakshmi Narasimha Swamy Devasthanam, Ahobilam, respondent No.3 herein, in the year 2003. It appears that the petitioner faced certain disciplinary proceedings in the course of his service at respondent No.3 Temple. The Commissioner of Endowments, respondent No.1 herein, passed orders, dated 27.05.2011, directing that the petitioner be transferred to his parent institution, respondent No.4. Accordingly, respondent No.3 issued proceedings, dated 26.06.2011, relieving the petitioner from service. He feels aggrieved by the same. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4. It is not in dispute that the petitioner is borne on the cadre of respondent No.4 institution. He was posted on deputation to respondent No.3 Temple. It is in the discretion of the authorities whether or not to continue the petitioner on deputation in the other institution. The petitioner cannot be said to have suffered any grievance on account of his redeployment in his parent institution. The grievance of the petitioner is that a clear vacancy may not exist in the post of Junior Assistant in respondent No.4 Temple. Such presumption is without any basis. If in fact he has been promoted as Junior Assistant in respondent No.4 institution. It is but natural that he can occupy that very vacancy. If any person is functioning against the vacancy due to deployment of the petitioner at respondent No.3 Temple, he has either to be reverted or otherwise shifted, to enable the petitioner to occupy the vacancy, which was held by him earlier. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of upholding the impugned order, but directing respondent No.4 to ensure that the petitioner is accommodated on his repatriation to the parent institution. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:02.08.2011 Note: Issue cc in three days. (B/o) kdl