IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2021 OF 2008 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.246 OF 2005 Ashok Honda ....Petitioner V/s. Tilak Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. ....Respondent Ms.Sayed Misar Fatima i/b Mr.A.M. Saraogi for the Petitioner. Mr.A. Dasgupta i/b M/s.J. Narula & Associates for the Respondent. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 4TH DECEMBER, 2009. P.C. :- 1. It does appear that on the previous occasion also, the Petitioner’s advocate had remained absent. However, as pointed out by Ms.Fatima, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner, on the date the matter was dismissed, every effort was made by the Petitioner’s advocate to remain present in Court. However, unfortunately he was held up in traffic while returning to Mumbai from out of town. The matter was dismissed before he could reach. However, as pointed out by Ms.Fatima, the present Notice of Motion was taken out on the same day for restoration. 2. In the circumstances, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer (a). The Petitioner shall pay the costs fixed at Rs.2000/- to the Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority on or before 31.1.2010.