Peiitiona Resaondenis H§$H CGURT OF CHHATTISGARH: §iL§SPUR wm yemion ig’; 1%. 977 of 2969 Bhagii’athi Dhruw, aged 42 yams, son of Sim Jhunau Dha’uw, suspended A.G.m, yegident 0f ’ QNOE, P.W.D. Cobnv, Rampur, Disti'ict Korba (Chhattisgarh). Versus The State of Chhai‘tisgam, Secretary. Department of Ravenue, Qaipur (CG). - District CoHeci‘cr, Kcrba (Chhattiwam). 3. Commissioner, Bé‘iaspur Divisioa. {CG}. ‘ a Sub DivisionaiGfficer{Re\/enue), Korba (CG). A” yo {Wiit Peiition under Ariicie 226 of Constitution of india) SB: Hon’ble Mr. 3aiish K. Agnmotri, J. Mr. Somnaih Verma, counsei for the petmoner. ‘ Mr. MRS. Bhaiia, Depuiy Goa/it Advocate for ihe $ta€e. Present: suspension. 2) Be that as it may, even if some persons invoived in the iike manner have noi been suspended, mat cao neve; be the ground for not suspeno‘ing the pei§iioner, as a criminal case being No. 58/96 has been registered‘ against ihe for having commiiteci offences under Section i3(’i}(ci) of the ‘ Preveniion of Corruption Aoi, 1988 and éections 436, 457, 468 and 120-8 of the indian Penai Code aad ohaiian has also been med. petitioner eRAL omea Mr. Somnat‘n Verma, iearned counsei appearing for the petitioner suomits that the suspension order dated 27-8-2064 (Annexure F’i2} is bad on the grouné that some othei’ persons were aiso chatged and case has been registered against the prime accused aiso, but they have not been piaoed under /_ §Pessed era this 15th day ef February, 2am} r 3} Ruie QUXb} of the MP. Civil Services (Ciassifica‘iian Controi & Appeai) Ruies 1966 provides that the appoiniing autherity 0? any authori‘iy t0 which r is subordinate ar the discipi‘mary autheriiy 0r any Oiher authority empawered in thai behaif by the Governor by genera! a" speciai om‘er, may piace a government ser-iam under suspeneion Wham a case agamet Mm in {especi cf any criminai offence is under mvesiigation. eneuiry of ti'iai. 4) in View of ihat, ihe§e is no megaiity in ine suspension order. The onier is just and proper and needs no interference. 5} in View of the foregoing the petition is dismissed in iimine. i Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri i Judge Raju