1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JJDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R D.B. Civil Writ Petition (Parole) No.1341 of 2009. Ram Singh Vs. State & Others Date of Order :::: 22/07/2009 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jitendra Ray Goyal Mr. Lakhan Singh Tomar, Counsel for the Petitioner Mrs. Rekha Madnani, Dy. Govt. Counsel for the State. By the Court : This order governs the disposal of writ petition (parole) filed on behalf of convict-petitioner Ram Singh, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Heard learned counsel for the convict-petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the material available on record. The convict-petitioner has sought first parole under Rule 9 of the Rajasthan Prisoner's Release on Parole Rules, 1958. The convict is serving his sentence of life imprisonment, awarded by the learned Additional District & Sessiions Judge (Fast Track) Alwar vide its judgment dated 2 02.08.2003 in sessions case No.67/2002 for commission of the offence under Section 302/149, 148 and 341 of the I.P.C. After issuing notice, in the reply the State has submitted that the conduct of the accused-petitioner has been unsatisfactorily and he has also remained willfully absent from the Jail Udhyogshala for which he was awarded punishment in Jail. As per Rule 9 of the Rajasthan Prisoner's Release on Parole Rules, 1958, it is a condition precedent for the accused to be released on parole that his conduct should have been good. In the facts and circumstances of the present case, therefore, the accused-petitioner does not fulfill the requirement of the Rule 9 of the Rajasthan Prisoner's Release on Parole Rules, 1958. As such he is not entitled for the benefit of being released on parole. This petition is accordingly dismissed. (Jitendra Ray Goyal) J. (Dalip Singh) J. ashok/ 3