1 cp-398.10 Ash FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 398 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri N.V. Bandiwadekar for the Petitioner. Shri A.I. Patel, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. ­­ CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 29TH NOVEMBER, 2010 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and the learned AGP for the Contemnors. 2. Affidavit of the Deputy Education Officer (Secondary) shows that though belatedly, compliance is made with the order of the Division Bench. Moreover, the officer has tendered unconditional apology for the delay. 3. In view of this position, no case is made out for initiating proceedings for contempt. It is obvious that if the Petitioner is aggrieved by the decision taken, he can always avail of appropriate remedy. Petition is disposed of accordingly. (A.S.OKA, J)