: 1 : chs-998-06=.sxw USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 998 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO. 543 OF 2000 Prafullata Rajan Varhadi .. Plaintiff v/s. Pushpalata Chandrakant Churi (Deceased) .. Defendants ......... Mr. Pravartak Pathak i/b Uday Warunjikar for the plaintiff Mr. Umashankar Upadhyay for the applicant Ms. Aparna Muralidharan i/b P.G. Lad for defendant nos. 1 and 3. ......... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 6th JANUARY, 2011 P.C. : 1. As the matter was called out, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant states that he has returned the papers to the applicant. In 2008, the applicant has not made any arrangement to see that he appears in the Court. The matter was called out in the morning. The applicant remained absent. When the matter was called out in the afternoon, the applicant is absent. It is clear that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting this chamber summons. The chamber summons is dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. The suit is already disposed of. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)