IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-11969 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 9.9.2011 Navdeep Kaur ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Naresh Gopal Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shailesh Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Veneet Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2. Rajan Gupta, J (oral). In this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., quashing of the FIR has been sought on the basis of compromise, claimed to have been arrived at between the petitioner and the complainant. Learned State counsel points out that there are total four accused in the matter. The present petition has, however, been preferred only on behalf of one of the accused. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 has denied the factum of compromise. In view of the fact that the petition was entertained by this court only in view of a compromise claimed to have been arrived at between the parties, there being no compromise, the petition is without any merit and is hereby dismissed. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 9.9.2011 'rajpal'