( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 308 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3855 OF 2007 Suresh s/o. Kerbaji Gawali .. Petitioner Versus Pramodkumar Sharadkumar Tiwari and ors. .. Respondents Shri Vivek Bhavthankar, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM : P.R. BORKAR,J. DATED : 14.10.2009 P.C. :- 1. Heard Adv. Shri Vivek Bhavthankar for the petitioner. He has brought to my notice the order passed by the Joint Charity Commissioner, Latur Region, Latur, on 19th November, 2007, below application Exh.50, in Inquiry Application No. 19 of 2005, whereby he prevented respondent Nos. 1 and 3 to 6 from dealing with movable or immovable properties of the trust, alienating trust properties or creating third party interest. Said order is taken on record and marked “X” for identification. It is stated that after ( 2 ) this order, the Assistant Charity Commissioner, Beed i.e. respondent No.4 has finalised the scheme, which is produced at Exh. “B”. 2. In my considered opinion, finalizing of scheme was not prohibited. If there is any objection to appointing respondent No.1 as trustee of the temple, that part of the matter can be challenged. However, it appears from para 8 that there were in all six trustees and respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and other three persons are appointed as trustees. In my considered opinion, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the scheme framed by the Assistant Charity Commissioner, before the appropriate forum. Framing of scheme cannot be said to be contempt of the Court. Therefore, this Contempt Petition is dismissed. [P.R. BORKAR,J.] snk/2009/OCT09/cp308.08