1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2103 OF 2010 (Mohansingh Premsingh Chauhan vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. AUGUST 16, 2010. Heard Shri Gour, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Wasnik, learned AGP for the respondents. The learned AGP has contended that in application as filed, seeking information, the petitioner has made allegations of corruption and bribery against the superiors and has also called for their explanation. I have perused the application as filed. Shri Gour, learned counsel argues that the alleged offending portion can be ignored and only information can be directed to be supplied. The petitioner cannot call for any explanation and also cannot allege any mal-practices in such application. If the petitioner files appropriate application seeking information only in accordance with law, the authorities shall dispose of the same within the statutory period. The impugned orders passed by the State Information Commission and by the appellate authority shall not come in the way of the petitioner in moving 2 such fresh application. With this clarification, writ petition is disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.