IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 1803 of 2006 Date of Decision: 06.11. 2008 Om Parkash ...... Appellant Versus Gurdial Singh and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.C.L.Sharma, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Sanjay Majithia, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shailender Sharma, Advocate for the respondents. **** Ajay Tewari, J. This appeal has been filed against the concurrent judgments of the Courts below dismissing the suit of the plaintiff-appellant for permanent injunction on the ground that he has become owner of the suit land by adverse possession against the respondents which they admittedly purchased in an open auction. The Courts below have upheld the purchase of the respondents and have rightly held that the appellant could not raise the plea of adverse possession since he denied the title of the respondents. It was in these circumstances that the plea of the plaintiff-appellant for permanent injunction was declined. Consequently I hold that the questions of law proposes in this appeal do not arise and the same is dismissed, however, with no order as to costs. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE November 06, 2008 sunita