IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18305 of 2009 Bhola Nath Srivastava, son of Late Kameshwar Prasad, Resident of Road No.39, H/O Prabhash Kumar, Raghunath Tola, Gardanibagh, District-Patna…………..Petitioner. Versus 1. The Bihar State Electricity Board, through its Chairman, Vidyut Bhawan, Patna-1 (hereinafter referred as Electricity Board). 2. The Chairman, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Patna. 3. The Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan,Patna. 4. The Joint Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board,Vidyut Bhawan, Patna. 5. The General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer, Central Electric Supply Area, Patna. 6. The Electrical Superintending Engineer, Patna Electrical Circle, Patna. 7. The Executive Engineer, MRT Division, Patna. 8. The Deputy Director ( Personnel) , Central Electric Supply Area, Patna. ………………………………………….Respondents. ----------- For the petitioner :- Mr. Ajey Kumar, Advocate. For the B.S.E.B. :- Mr. Archana Jha, Advocate. 2. 23. 12. 2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Respondent-Board. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 31st July, 2008 from the post of Fitter Grade-2, MRT Division, New Punaichak, Patna, only provisional pension has been granted to the petitioner and also received Provident Fund dues and Group Insurance. However, authorities did not pay admissible interest till the date of actual payment. Learned counsel for the Respondent-Board submits that in case petitioner file a representation stating details of his unpaid claims, the same shall be considered without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of serious ailment as he is suffering 2 from cancer and taking his treatment in Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, petitioner proposes to file a representation stating details of his unpaid claim before Respondent No.3. In case, such representation is filed along with relevant documents in support of his claim as also certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks from today, Respondent No. 3 shall consider and dispose of his unpaid claims in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months on receipt of such representation, so that the unpaid claim of the petitioner could be settled without delay. With the above observations/directions, the writ application stands disposed of. m.p. ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J. )