CRP 288/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.N. SARMA Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner was the defendant in Money Suit No. 21/06 pending in the court of learned Civil Judge, Jr. Divn., No.1, Nagaon in which a claim for recov ery of Rs.49000/- with other relief have been made against the petitioner. In the present revision petition, the petitioner has challenged the orde r dated 15/3/10 passed by the learned trial court. Challenging the said order, the petitioner already approached this Court by filing CRP No. 119/10 which was dismissed on 2/6/10 on withdrawal. The other order challenged in this petition is the order dated 13/7/10. By the said order, considering the absence of the d efendant/petitioner without steps when the matter was called upon, the learned t rial court passed an order to proceed ex-parte against the defendant /petitioner fixing 3/8/10 for argument. Upon perusal of the impugned order and the materials available on record , I do not find that the trial court has committed any jurisdictional error in p assing the aforesaid orders. In the absence of the defendant when the matter wa s called upon, the trial court adopted a right course to be followed in view of the conduct of the defendant/petitioner by passing the order dated 13/7/10 and t he same cannot be said to be without jurisdiction justifying interference of thi s Court. Similarly, the order dated 15/3/10 was passed rejecting the prayer of the petitioner as the petitioner was not present at the time when the order was passed on 8/9/09 and in the meantime the suit proceeded substantially. The lear ned trial court had necessary jurisdiction to pass such order. Accordingly, I do not find any merit in this revision petition and the same stands dismissed. Interim order dated 2/8/10 passed earlier stands vacated.