IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1730 of 2003 Yuvraj Grih Nirman Swavlambi Swavlambi Sahkari Samiti Limited, through its Secretary, Shri R.K.Singh, son of Shri R.P.Singh, resident of 19-Namada New Layout, Golmuri, P.S. Golmuri, District-Jamshedpur ……….. Petitioner Versus 1. The Bihar State Housing Co-Operative Federation Limited, through its Administrator, Lalit Bhawan, Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Patna 2. The Administrator, Bihar State Housing Co-Operative Federation Limited, Lalit Bhawan, Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Patna 3. The Chief Manager (Administration), Bihar State Housing Co-Operative Federation Limited, Lalit Bhawan, Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Patna ………….. Respondents. with CWJC No.1785 of 2003 Minakshi Sahkari Grih Nirman Samiti Limited, through its Secretary, Dharma Nand Jha, son of Late Mangala Nand Jha, resident of M-42, Argora Housing Colony, P.S. Argora, District-Ranchi. ……… Petitioner Versus 1. The Bihar State Housing Co-Operative Federation Limited, through its Administrator, Lalit Bhawan, Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Patna 2. The Administrator, Bihar State Housing Co-Operative Federation Limited, Lalit Bhawan, Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Patna 3. The Chief Manager (Administration), Bihar State Housing Co-Operative Federation Limited, Lalit Bhawan, Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Patna ……….. Respondents. ------- For the petitioner: M/S. Naresh Dikshit and Kunal Tiwary, Advocates For Resp. Nos. 4 and 5: Mr. Purushottam Jha, Advocate. ------- 6. 7.4.2010 In the reply to the counter affidavit filed today in 2 CWJC No. 1730 of 2003, it is stated by the petitioner that by Annexure- P/3 certain package has been proposed in the year 2005 by the Bihar State Housing Co-operative Federation Limited for default resolution. Mr. Naresh Dikshit, learned counsel for the petitioners of both the writ applications submits that the petitioners have not been given the benefit of the said package although they had approached the Federation for the said purpose. Learned counsel for the Federation however, submits that the writ applications are not maintainable in view of the statutory remedy provided by Section 48 of the Bihar Co-operative Societies Act, 1935. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ applications with liberty to approach the authorities of the Bihar State Housing Co-operative Federation for default resolution in terms of the aforesaid package. The writ applications are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. S. Pandey ( Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.)