BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Second day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.13313 of 2011 SUNDARAM ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VEERAPANDI POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.271/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate For Respondent :Mr.K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprhending arrest at the hands of the respondent police in Crime No.271 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for alleged offences under Sections 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner has come up with the present petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2.According to the casae of prosecution, the petitioner produced a School Certificate, showing his date of birth for the purpose of getting employment. Now, it has turned out that the date of birth given by him is not correct and that the school certificate produced by him in support of the date of birth itself is not a genuine document. With these allegations, the present case has been registered. \ 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that for the purpose of getting certificate, he applied to the school and he did not tamper with the document. He would furtehr submit that the petitioner would co-operate with the further invesigation. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the present Headmaster of the School has given a statement that as the said certificate was not issued by the said School. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.From the rival contentions, now, it could be seen that there is a dispute as to whether the said certificate, was really issued by the then Headmaster or not. The matter needs further investigation. In any view of the matter, since every transaction is based on records, by granting anticipatory bail, in my considered opinion, the further investigation shall not be hampered with. Above all, the petitioner is prepared to appear before the respondent police to subject himself for interrogation. In such view of the matter, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, but with conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Theni , on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m. without fail for a period of eight weeks. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. sd/- 02/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THENI DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VEERAPANDI POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT, +1. CC to M/S. P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate SR.No.37616 rl/6c – 4.11.2011 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13313 of 2011 Date :02/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/