IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2246 of 2011 Md. Sakil Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 5 03.08.2011 Petitioner and opposite party no.2 are present. Petitioner is ready to keep the opposite party no.2 as wife with full dignity and honour, however it is submitted by opposite party no.2 that the petitioner has performed second marriage which is not being denied by the petitioner, but it is submitted that since 2007, the opposite party no.2 deserted the petitioner and was not willing to resume the conjugal life then the petitioner performed second marriage which is controverted by opposite party no.2 to the effect that she was residing with the petitioner till 2009. In the present situation, the opposite party no.2 is not willing to go to her matrimonial house. The petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 2,000/- per month to the opposite party no.2 from September, 2011 by depositing the same in the bank account of opposite party no.2 by second week of every month. The aforesaid offer of the petitioner is 2 acceptable to the opposite party no.2 who undertakes to supply the bank account number to the petitioner within a period of two weeks by filing the account number on affidavit before the learned court below. The aforesaid payment will be subject to any order being passed in matrimonial or maintenance proceeding. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, West Muzaffarpur in connection with Complaint Case No. 2104/2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Three consecutive defaults in making payment by the petitioner will give liberty to the opposite party no.2 to file an application for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner. The present order will not preclude the parties to 3 reconcile the matter in future. Amrendra/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)