IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15176 of 2011 1. MARKENDEY PANDEY. 2. HARENDRA PANDEY. 3. OM PRAKASH PANDEY. 4. RAMASHANKAR SHARMA. 5. RAMESHWAR SHARMA…………………………….Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 18.05.2011 Heard the learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioners is that the petitioners purchased the land of the complainant from a fictitious person. The complainant claims to have purchased the said land on 14.06.2000 for which mutation has also been done. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the basic dispute with regard to the passage and name of petitioners’ vendor is recorded in the revenue records. It appears from the impugned order that 144 Cr. P. C. proceeding was also initiated between the parties and there was some sort of settlement also. 2 Considering the nature of occurrence and there was litigation between the parties from before, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Buxar Town P.S. No. 46 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Buxar subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)