1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.189 OF 2009 (Shri Avinash s/o Pundlik Kakde vs. The Hon'ble Chief Minister and others) ___________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 9, 2009 Heard Shri Narnaware, learned Counsel for the petitioner. We have considered the contentions canvassed by the learned Counsel for the petitioner. The learned Counsel for the petitioner has failed to demonstrate any illegality so far as recommendations of the 6th Pay Commission are concerned, which are made applicable to the employees of the State of Maharashtra by the State Government. The learned Counsel for the petitioner has also failed to demonstrate that the action of the State Government in accepting the 6th Pay Commission's recommendations is either inconsistent with any provision of law or suffers from want of jurisdiction. Though the petition consists of 32 pages, however, 2 the learned Counsel for the petitioner did not canvass any particular ground in order to show that the action of the State Government in accepting the 6th Pay Commission's recommendations cannot be sustained in law. In the circumstances, petition is misconceived and devoid of substance and hence, the same is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE khj