IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA. WRIT PETITION NO. 98 OF 1999. 1. Mr. Laxmikant B. Naik, Technical Assistant, PWD., Ponda. 2. Mr. Sudhir A. Parab, Technical Assistant, PWD., Opa, Khandepar. 3. Mr. Dattaprasad S. Kamat, Technical Assistant, PWD., Ponda. 4. Mr. Dilip M. Dhawlikar, Technical Assistant, PWD., Ponda. ... Petitioners. Versus 1. State of Goa through the Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Panaji. 2. The Chief Engineer, PWD., Altinho, Panaji. 3. Mr. Ratnakaran Challan, Junior Engineer, H. No. 887/11(2), Kamat Nagar, Socorro, Porvorim. 4. Mr. Devidas S. Naik, Junior Engineer, Flat No. C-304, Dhanalakshmi Complex, Bhatulem, Panaji. 5. Mr. Pramod S. Prabhu, Junior Engineer, A-3, Classic Enclave, Borbhat, Taleigao. 6. Mr. C. Radhakrishnan, Junior Engineer, MAG-3, M.I.G. Colony, Pundalik Nagar, Porvorim. ... Respondents. Mr. S.D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Mr. A.D. Bhobe, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, Advocate General with Mr. H.R. Bharne, Government Advocate for the Respondents 1 and 2. Mr. D.B. Ambekar, Advocate for the Respondents 3 to 6. - 2 - Coram : F.I. REBELLO AND P.V. HARDAS, JJ. Date : 13th August 2003. ORAL JUDGMENT (PER REBELLO, J.) In this case the petitioners have challenged the Recruitment Rules. Subsequent to the filing of the petition, new Recruitment Rules have been gazetted under Article 309 of the Constitution of India. That being the case, nothing survives in the petition. If the petitioners are aggrieved with the new Recruitment Rules, liberty to challenge the same. Rule discharged, with no order as to costs. (F.I. REBELLO) JUDGE. (P.V. HARDAS) JUDGE. ed’s .