IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN FRIDAY, THE 26TH JUNE 2009 / 5TH ASHADHA 1931 CMCP.No. 20 of 2008 IN RFA .../2008 --------------------- OS.362/2004 of I ADDL.SUB COURT,ERNAKULAM PETITIONER/APPELLANT VASUDEVAN PILLAI, ALIAS VASUDEVAN K.PANTHALATH, S/O.KRISHNA PILLAI, AGED 54, PANDALATH BUNGLOW, POONITHURA VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.JESWIN P.VARGHESE RESPONDENTS:RESPONDENTS & STATE: 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. 2. PEETHAMBARAN.N., S/O.KRISHNAN NAIR, AGED 52, RESIDING AT SOUPARNIKA, HOUSE NO. 29/812, (OLD NO. 48/1670), DESHABHIMANI ROAD, ELAMAKKARA, KOCHI-26. 3. P.X.JAMES, MINAN HOUSE, N.G.O.QUARTERS JN., NEAR ST.ANTONY'S CHURCH, KAKKANAD P.O. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. R. LAKSHMINARAYAN. SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN FOR R1 SRI.P.V.BABY FOR R2 THIS CIVIL MISC. CASE(PAUPER) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMAN & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = C.M.C.(P) NO. 20/2008 IN R.F.A. ...../2008 . = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = DATED THIS, 26TH DAY OF JUNE, 2009. O R D E R Raman, J. In the light of the order passed by this Court, it should be taken that the Revenue has no objection in allowing this application to file the suit as informa pauperis. In the affidavit filed by the applicant the details of the property belonging to him is declared. It is stated that there is no sufficient means for raising the funds for paying the court fee. In the circumstances, we allow this C.M.C.(P), however, subject to the right of the Government to move on a later stage in terms of Order 33 Rule 9. P.R. RAMAN, JUDGE. P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE. KNC/-