@55» i^ NGLE W^ s IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR •^ .$ Writ Petition (B No PETITIONER 7 : .SSll/ 2010 RESPONDENTS '<• »wy ^y ^y^ /^ ^ ^ ^ Onkar Karelia, S/o Shri Rajju Lal Karelia, Aged about 25 years, Caste - Mehter, Occupation- Unemployed, R/o Ward No. 13, Jankpur Road, Takhatpur, Police Station - Takhatpur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.). Versus- / : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe Development Department, Mantralaya, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^2. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Kota, Tahsil Kota, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) /-3. Tahsildar, Takhatpur, Tahsil - Takhatpur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIQN QF INDIA FORJLSSUANCE QF A WRHL^ CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS OR ANY QTHER WRIT ^)R DIRECTION TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. 3TT^T '^T f<^|ch ^WT ^ll^l 9ft^|G^ I*1» ^' -Y Tumane "s^ ^ww^ ®ti1-(-i<i<o, fcs|diy^< ^ ^.<:Cs^r^^^l/tO Wff^^KW^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^ ^TI^T TRR7 ( ^Gtf"lc<<;^T) ^TW^rf^T ^T^T SB : Hon'ble Shri ManEiidra Mohan 23-06-2010 Shri K. K Singh, counsel forth|e Smt^mita Ghai, Panel Law1 copy. X';' HeaFd,,^y The grievanoe as set out by th|£ claims to belong to Scheduied Cast^ advantage ass aisadvanteges class| certificate. it is submitted that eariier the year 1976, however, the petitior status as he is not possessed of perr that the petitioner is also belongs to t^ application was submitted cn 07-04^ Officer (Revenue), Kota for issuance| neither consideration has taken plac^ issued bythe respondentauthority. Taking into consideration the| Court, in the opinion ofthis Court, it respondent No.2-Sub Divisional Offi| consider petitioner's representatio^ accordance with law and decide the| four months from the date of receipt that the petitioner is entitled to issued without any undue deiay. With the aforesaid direction, tl|i( Gr)i^f^i<i1l 'RFI^ff ^f f^Tst <P»1^I< ^3tRm3TT^?T Bhrivastava.J. petitioner. fer for the State/respondents on advance petitioner in the petition is that though he (Caste "Meheter"), he is deprived to take on account of non-avaitebilitv of caste ^ tempora^' caste certificate was issued in ler is unable to seek benefit of his casts lanent caste certiflcate. !t is. atso submitted (e handicapped category, as he is blind. An (010 (Annexure P-10) to the Sub Divisional of permanent caste certificate, but so far, nor permanent caste certificate has been nature of grievance ventilated befo.re this [A/ould be .appropriate at this stage to direct )er, Kota, .Tehsit Kota, District Biiaspur, to for issuance of caste certificate in same at the earliest with an outer iimjt of )f a copy ofthis order In case, If it is found pernjianent oaste certificate, the same shall be |e petition is finally disposed of, Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge