IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1617 of 2011 DEVENDRA RAI, SON OF LATE PRIKCHAN RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 28.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Samastipur (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 341 of 2010 registered under Sections 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Admittedly, the victim boy has returned to his home safely and his statement was recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C., in which he stated that he was taken away by the petitioner and others for the purpose of his marriage and, thereafter, his marriage was forcibly solemnized with a girl. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is major and, as a matter of fact, he solemnized his marriage with one Guria Kumari by his own sweet will but after solemnization of the marriage, the family members of the victim boy started making illegal demand which was not fulfilled, resulting the filing of the instant case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with above stated Samastipur (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 341 of 2010. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)