IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.16424 of 2011 Date of decision: 16.09.2011 Shiv Singh and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. I.S. Saggu, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Raghbir Chaudhary, Sr. DAG, Punjab. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Mr. Raghbir Chaudhary, learned Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, has fairly submitted that dismissal of revision vide impugned order dated 1.8.2011 was not proper. He further states that revision was very well maintainable, therefore, it ought to have been decided at its own merit. He further states that impugned order dated 1.8.2011 be set aside and revision be restored to its original number and it shall be decided at its own merit in accordance with law. In view of the statement made by Mr. Chaudhary, present petition is allowed. Order impugned dated 1.8.2011 is set aside and revision is restored to its original number. Parties shall appear before the Revisional Authority on 20.10.2011. Thereafter Revisional Authority shall decide the revision at its own merit in accordance with law. (Alok Singh) Judge September 16, 2011 R.S.