-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3136 OF 2011 Ashok A. Jolia and Ors. ..Petitioners. Versus The Dy. Registrar and Others. ..Respondents. Mr. K. S. Patil for the petitioners. Mr. C. R. Sonawane, AGP. Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : April 20, 2011. P. C. : 1. Not on board. Mentioned for production in view of the urgency. Production was granted. 2. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 3. Petitioner nos. 1 to 4 are the member of the managing committee of Madhu Co-operative Housing Society Ltd, SVP Road, Borivali (West), Mumbai – 400 092. On 8th November 2010 1st respondent issued notice under section 77A of the M.C.S. Act directing the petitioners to show cause why the Administrator should not be appointed on the said society. This notice was challenged by the petitioners by filing revision before 2nd respondent. The said revision is dismissed by the order impugned in this Writ petition. 4. I am not inclined to entertain the writ petition as challenge is srp -: 2 :- only to the show cause notice and petitioner is always at liberty to give reply to the said notice. In my view, the interest of the petitioner can be protected by directing 1st respondent not to give effect the order in case it is adverse to the interest of the petitioner. The petition is therefore disposed of by passing following order. -: O R D E R :- In the event the 1st respondent passes an order under section 77A of the M.C.S. Act appointing an administrator on the said society, the same shall not be given effect to for the period of 15 days from the date of service of such order on the petitioner. (RANJIT MORE, J.)