o ^' (fri 2) IN THE HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURE AT BILASPURfCHHATTISGARH} ^o WRFT PETmON N0. '' ' - /2005 PETITIONER -•'/ ...•'.n y ..••'\rl^..y ^M^ ^^•^ .-^. Suneeta Gupta, aged 41 Yrs. W/o. Shri Deepak Gupta, R/o. HMo 44, near crico garage, Amanaka, Raipur (C.G.) V?-" ,^V ^yy '^y RESPONDENTS VERSUS /1) State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary to the dept. of home Affairs, D.K.S. Bhawan Secretariat, Raipur(C.G.) 2) Superintendent of police, Raipur,' Chhattisgarh 3) Station House office, P.S. City Kotvifali, Raipur (C.G.) 4) Inspector General of Police, Raipur, C.G. .5) Jagdish Prasad Gupta S/o. Babulal Gupta, aged 67 years. 6) Pradeep Kumar Gupta S/o. Jagdish Prasad Gupta, agecl 45 Years. 7) Sanjay Kumar Gupta S/o. Jagdish Prasad Gupta, aged 42 Years, respondent no. 5 to 7 are R/o. House No. 11/566, Sadar Bazar, Raipur, P.S. City Kotwali, Raipur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR GRANT OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR CERCIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRITS QR DIRECTIONS OR ANY OTHER REMADY OF THE LIKE NATAURE ^w^^ .^•' <y^ XI-HC-22 ^__ sn^rw f^TTERSn^T giiiWdf^cT <° 3ap. 3^ ^I-MK-I^, ®Tfltf'l(o,(stCtl+iy tllHrlll SnW^i ^.^.^.•..^%.';.\^~ 3I^r?Tt(TWHf?(T Meard Shri S.C. Varma, Dubey, Govt. Advocate for the S This is ihe ssoond round iariier the petilioner fiied writ pe| on 14-4-2003 after breaking Shi away whoie jewe'iery vaiuing.ai She immediately rushed *o the While disposing of the said wri) make a representation before direcied to snqulre Into and deci| Lesmed. counsei for t!1 petitioner made a representatioj the offence under Sectlons 4541 8-1-2005 and since then the D<t and the maiief is lyi-ng ss it is, the invesi'gation and fite report if As the case has aireat inveetigating into the mstter, ccncerned Judiciai iViadietrafe staiion falis and oonoerned IViagl With the above obsen/atit Parlies ars ent!7ied for cd! «bM(d41.iimcfF ff fsW (fezn: ^;3i1WT3l1^?T |counseS tor the psiitloner and Shri Si fate/responitents No.1 to 4. bi iitiaaiion bv ths petiiioner bsfore this Couri. i|iiion No.3575/2003. raising the grievanoe ihat [iook of her shop, respondents No.5 to 7 tuuk }iout Rs.3 la.khs which was iy'ng in !he shop. toiice but the poilce had not taker' any aGtion. petition this Court aiiowed the peiitioner ra responde",t Np.2 and respondent No.2 was ipe the representation in accordance with ia'A'. je pefitioner submitted ShaS thereafter the ti upon which the case for the commission of 380 and 426 of the I.P.C. was registered on iiice is not proceedlng with the investigatton Sheretore, ihe poiice be airected io complete lefore ths concernscj Magisirate. y,' besn reaisisred and/the Police ,'s not Ithe Detitioner is entitied to apDroach Ihe nder whose iurisdictiGH the concerned Dolioe [strate is enflt!ed to oal! for She report. {?n, the petiiion stands disposed of. c^riified ccpy Q?th)s order. _____--—_—— L.C. Bhadoo r ^ '.<~^ -^^