IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20541 of 2011 Chandan Kumar Singh Versus The State Of Bihar (C.B.I.) ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rana Pratap Singh, Sr. Adv. For the C.B.I. : Mr. Bipin Kumar Sinha. ------ 2/ 27.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the C.B.I. Rs. 7,92,000/- is fraudulently encashed in the account of one Ganesh Prasad, not authorized for receiving the same. Defence is that petitioner is not signatory of the cheque and if that was not signed by authorized person involvement of L.I.C., officials was also there but they have not been made accused in the case may not be ground for others to be exonerated when involvement is found otherwise. Conspiracy of this petitioner is disclosed by Alok Ranjan in his statement under Section 164 Cr. P.C. may be ignored but his handwriting on the disputed cheque has been found after comparing the same. So, he is not entitled for bail at the stage. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for bail is rejected. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)