IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.34017 of 2011 ====================================================== Randhir Singh Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== 2 12-10-2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the agent for executing various schemes is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 419, 420, 409, 467, 468 and 471/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The irregularity and non-compliance of the government rules by the concerned officials were alleged in the F.I.R., subsequently, during the enquiry, eight accused persons were inducted by the General Director (Industry). It is alleged that they used J.C.B. machine instead of human labour and the work were done contrary to the specified sites. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner was not named in the F.I.R. and the F.I.R. named accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 13897 of 2010 and Cr. Misc. No. 35315 of 2010. It appears from the impugned order that the investigation is still pending against the petitioner. Considering the fact that other accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Dharhara P.S. Case No. 87/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra Kumar/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)