IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 28TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 9TH PHALGUNA 1932 RCRev..No. 200 of 2007() ------------------------ RCA.87/2006 of RENT CONTROL APPELLATE AUTHORITY, THRISSUR RCP.22/2004 of RENT CONTROL COURT, THRISSUR .................... REVISION PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS :- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. JOSHY, S/O. CHALISSERY KUTTOOKKARAN- GEORGE, NEDUPUZHA DESOM, KANIMANGALAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK. 2. GEORGE, CHALISSERY KUTTOOKKARAN GEORGE, NEDUPUZHA DESOM, KANIMANGALAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK. 3. MARY, W/O. GEORGE, CHALISSERY, KUTTOOKKARAN HOUSE, NEDUPUZHA DESOM, KANIMANGALAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.T.KRISHNAN UNNI, SENIOR ADVOCATE RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT/PETITIONER :- ----------------------------------------------------------------- MR. JOSE, S/O.CHAKKALAKKAL KOCHAPPU, VADOOKKARA DESOM, KOORKKANCHERRY VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK. ADV. SRI.N.SUBRAMANIAM FOR R1 SRI.M.S.NARAYANAN FOR R1 THIS RENT CONTROL REVISION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: jvt RCRev..No. 200 of 2007 ORDER IN I.A.No.1529/2007 IN RCR No.200/2007 Dismissed. SD/- PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. SD/- N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. 28.2.2011. //True Copy// P.A. to Judge PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JJ. ---------------------------------- R.C.R. No.200 of 2007 ------------------------------ Dated this the 28th day of February 2011 O R D E R Pius C. Kuriakose, J. Today also there is no representation for the revision petitioner. Sri.M.S.Narayanan, the learned counsel for the respondent would draw our attention to the order dated 17.9.2009 passed by this Court in this RCR. Mr.Narayanan submitted that the revision petitioner has not complied the direction passed by this Court for depositing a sum of Rs.2,30,400/- so far. According to Mr.Narayanan that must be the reason why the revision petitioner is not turning up. On verification it is seen that the above part of the direction contained in the order dated 17.9.2009 has not been complied with. R.C.R. No.200 of 2007 -: 2 :- Under the above circumstance, the RCR will stand dismissed however, only for default. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Jvt