IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 3958 of 2008. Decided on: 06.10.2010. __________________________________________________________ Satish Kumar Gupta. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : None. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondent No.1. None for respondents No.2 to 10. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): The intimation as per order dated 29th July, 2010, was sent to the petitioner. Neither the petitioner is present in person nor is he represented by any learned Advocate. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution, so also the pending application(s), if any. However, the same will be revived as and when appropriate application is moved for the purpose. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. October 06, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?