IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39609 of 2010 SANTOSH RAM & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 03.11.10. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are languishing in custody since 12.07.2010 in a case registered under Section 365 of the I.P.C. It is alleged against the petitioners that in February 2002, the petitioners requested the complainant to allow his son to go to Haryana on assurance of earning of Rs. 1,000/- per month but thereafter the complainant’s son never returned which culminated in lodging of the present complaint in the year 2004. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the complainant’s son is major and he went to earn his livelihood of his own and the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. Considering the fact that the complaint was lodged after two years of the alleged occurrence, let the petitioners, Santosh Ram and Mantosh Ram, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each 2 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Ist Class, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 208 of 2004. The learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioners if the petitioners fail to appear on three consecutive dates during trial. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)