THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.26071 of 2006 ORAL ORDER: The issue that arises for consideration in this writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment rendered in W.P.No.26070 of 2006 dated 1.10.2010, whereunder this Court, while dismissing the writ petition, held as under: “The Labour Court recorded a specific finding to the effect that the petitioners failed to prove the charge. A charge, alleging impersonation, can be proved only by examining the actual person, who is said to have been impersonated. No such effort was made. It appears that the 1st respondent is also known as Narsi Reddy in the village, and that was treated as basis for alleging that he impersonated as Venkat Reddy. When the so called Venkat Reddy was not examined, the basis of charge disappears. This Court is not inclined to interfere with the award passed by the Labour Court. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed”. In view of the same, following the principle laid down in the said judgment, this writ petition is also dismissed in terms thereof. No order as to costs. ______________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 7.2.2011 DA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.26071 of 2006 7.2.2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.26071 of 2006 Date: 7th February, 2011 Between: The Central Power Distribution Company Ltd., represented by its Managing Director, Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad & another. .. Petitioners And B.Krishnaiah and another. .. Respondents