( 1 ) wp8792.09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8792 OF 2009 Rohidas s/o. Rangnath Brahmaaraksh & Anr. .. Petitioners Versus Ushabai w/o. Masuji Shinde & Anr. .. Respondents Mr. Patel Shaikh Ashpak Taher, Advocate for the petitioners. CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR,J. DATED : 10.01.2011 P.C. :- 1. Heard learned advocate. The petitioners are the original plaintiffs in suit bearing R.C.S. No. 1143 of 2007. They sought interim injunction during pendency of the suit by filing an application vide Exh.5. By order dated 27.06.2008, the Trial Court dismissed their application. The dismissal of the application is confirmed by the First Appellate Court in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 122 of 2008. The dispute relates to an open plot. ( 2 ) wp8792.09 2. Having heard learned advocate and on perusal of the orders impugned, it is amply clear that the dispute relates to title over the plot in question. It is common knowledge that the possession in respect of the plot would follow the title. At this juncture, the question of title cannot be decided only on basis of prima facie material. Considering these aspects and having regard to the fact that there are concurrent findings of both the Courts, the petition is dismissed with direction to the Trial Court to expedite the final hearing of the suit bearing R.C.S. No. 1143 of 2008 and to decide the controversy regarding the question of title on basis of the available material and without being influenced by the impugned orders as well as any other order and by taking up early hearing within a period of six months. No costs. [V.R. KINGAONKAR,J.] snk/2011/JAN11/wp8792.09