IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 2327 of 2009 Decided on: 15.09.2011 Rukmani Devi & others …Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. & others …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioners: Mr. R.K. Gautam, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Vikrant Chandel, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Vivek Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General, with Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 3. None for respondents No. 4 to 8. Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral) It is not disputed that this matter is identical to CWPs No. 3327, 3317, 3134 of 2009 and 7680 of 2010, decided on 7th December, 2010, by a learned Single Judge of this Court, in which the learned Single Judge held as follows: “3. State Government and its functionaries, in their reply, have stated that their scheme is distinct and separate from the Central Government's Scheme and that their Scheme will be funded by the State Government itself and the funds of Central Government, for its National Rural Health Mission, will not be diverted for implementing its scheme (MGPSSS). 1 Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes. -: 2 :- 4. In view of the aforesaid reply of the State Government and its functionaries, no orders are required to be passed. The Scheme of the State Government does not affect the petitioners or their alleged status/claim as ASHAs, in any manner. Writ petitions are disposed of accordingly. Pending applications shall also stand disposed of.” 2. The present petition is also disposed of in the identical terms. No costs. (Deepak Gupta) Judge September 15, 2011 (rajni)