IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27385 of 2008 SHAILESH RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR - - - - 2. 31.7.2008 Heard. The facts have been clearly stated in the petition of complaint but incidentally some of the facts are not stated in the petition for bail which is being disposed of by the present order, like, that there was an order of maintenance in favour of the complainant by a competent court under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act and that by getting the compromises in the earlier complaint petition as also in the Matrimonial petition, the lady was brought back and she was tortured and expelled in the manner as alleged. The contention is that the petitioner filed a Divorce petition and after getting notice on that the lady filed the complaint petition. This contention is undermined by some of the facts of the present complaint petition in which the petitioner is in custody. The complaint petition indicates the 2 stark reality so as not to permitting this Court to direct release of the petitioner on bail. The petition is dismissed. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)