S5?^? c ^. [Q^^-- IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH^AT BILASPUR W. P. fS) No. ^^- ISQW ^°'<\ PETITIONER ^ RESPONDENTS .iy ,^M '^y ./ ,<?•' "t?-' ••' *, .f^" •v'^' , /' ^. Dr. A.K. Jaiswal, S/o. Shri J.P. Jaiswal, Aged about 55 years, Presently working as Professor (Physics), Govt. Science CoUege, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Manatralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipi.u- (C.G.) 2. Conimissioner, Directorate of Higher Education, Govt. Science College Campus, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Smt. Shashikant Bhandari, Principal, Late Deviprasad Choubey Govt. College, Saja, Distt. Durg (C.G.) /4. Dr Ashok Pandey, F>rincipal, Govt. College, Pakhanjur, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) .5. Dr. L.N. Verma, Principal, Saint Gahira Guru Rameshwar CoUege, Lailunga, Distt. Ralgarh. 6. Dr. Bihari Lal Sahu, Principal, Govt. College, Dharamjalgarh, Distt. - Raigarh. 7. Dr. M.P. Gupta, Principal, Govt. College, Devbhog, Distt. Raipur (C)Q.) 8. Dr. Ranjit Kumar F'urohit, Principal, Late Jaidev Satpathi, Govt. CoUe^, Basiia, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) '^ di i ii I_J-UWB! /9. Dr. Surendra Kumar Rajput, Principal, Govt. Maharshi Valtniki,College Bhanupratappur, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) ^10. Dr. Smt. Aruna Palta, Govt. Model Girls CoUege, Raipui- (C.G.) 11. Dr. Prakash Chandra Choubey, Principal, Govt. Gaj'anand Madhav Miiktibodh, CoUege, Kawardha (C.G.) /12. Dr. KapU Narayan Sharma, Principal, Govt. Lal Kalitld Singh, College, Antagarh, Distt. Kanlcer WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION. ETC OR ORDERfS) OR DIRECTIONfS) AS DEEM FIT BY THIS HON'BLE COURT. UlTl II1 '::I -^^" -S-iS llf'°^;;. r ^te.;: ^ y^ ^/ ^ ^^^^^ !\v' WRJT PETTFIONiS) N0.42 OF2011 Versus Dr. A.K.Jaiswa! State of ChhatSisaarh & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon'bie Mr. Safish K. Agnihotri, J.] Present:- Shri Ashish Shrivastava with Shri Harsh Wardhan, Advocates for the petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lav/yer for the State. (Passed o." 07'" day of Janua"/, 2011) By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to consider his representation pendlng since 22.9.2010 (Annexure 2. Shri Roy, learned counse! appeanng for the State submits that if a representation of the petitioner is pending, the same sha!! be consldered and decided preferabiy within a period of 6 weeks. 3. In view of the above, the petitioner submits that nothing survives in this petition for adjudlcation at this stage. 4. Accordingiy, the writ petiti.on stands disposed of. No order asto Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge