THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Contempt Case No.115 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner was awarded a civil contract by the respondents and an agreement was entered into. However, the 1st respondent cancelled the contract through proceedings dated 24.02.2009. The petitioner filed W.P.No.5518 of 2009 questioning the same. The writ petition was allowed on 23.03.2008 and the proceedings dated 24.02.2009 were set aside. This contempt case is filed alleging that though the petitioner executed the work, the respondents are not paying the bills. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. The effect of the order passed by this Court was that the petitioner was entitled to proceed with the contract not withstanding the termination. In case, the work was executed as per the stipulation and the bills were not paid, a different cause of action arises and the petitioner has to work out his remedies separately. Therefore, the writ petition is closed, leaving it open to the petitioner to seek redressal, in case he had executed the work and bills are not paid. There shall be no order as to costs. __________ 24.02.2010 JSU THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Contempt Case No.115 of 2010 Date: 24.02.2010 JSU