- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1058 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.1058 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.1058 OF 2006 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.942 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.942 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.942 OF 2006 Madhav Ramchandra Kahandal ...Applicant vs. Subhash Sambhaji Dhale and another ...Respondent Mr.S.K.Shinde for the Applicant Mr.S.V.More A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : OCTOBER 19,2006. : OCTOBER 19,2006. : OCTOBER 19,2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Appeal is already admitted. The conviction of the Applicant is for offence under section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The substantive sentence is S.I. for one year. The fine of Rs.34,000/- has been imposed out of which a sum of Rs.5,000/- has been deposited. 2. The Applicant was on bail throughout the trial. Hence, a case is made out for grant of bail. However, the Applicant will have to deposit further amount towards fine. 3. Application is disposed of by passing the following order: i) The Applicant shall be enlarged on the same bail on which he was enlarged during the pendency of the trial subject to filing fresh bail bonds. - 2 - ii) The Applicant is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- towards the fine amount within a period of eight weeks from today. If compliance is not made within stipulated period, liberty to the Respondents to take out appropriate application. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE