IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9871 of 2010 1. CHHATHU YADAV, SON OF LATE SAJWAN YADAV. 2. MANAGER YADAV @ MANGER YADAV, SON OF LATE SAJWAN YADAV. BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-MAJHARIYA, P.S. MALAHI, DISTRICT-EAST CHAMPARAN. ………………………………………………PETITIONERS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR……………OPPOSITE PARTY. --------- For the Petitioners : M/s. Ansul and Madhurendra Kumar, Advocates. For the State : Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, A.P.P. ------------ 2. 26.3.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case registered under Sections 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are not named in the First Information Report and even the victim in his statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has not named the petitioners, however, subsequently at belated stage the name of the petitioners has come on the basis of suspicion. The petitioners are stated to - 2 - be in custody since 30.10.2009. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioners, namely, (1) Chhathu Yadav and (2) Manager Yadav @ Manger Yadav, are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the 9th Additional Sessions Judge, East Champaran, Motihari, in connection with S.Tr. No.855/09 arising out of Paharpur P.S. Case No.78/1996, with a further condition that one of the bailors in case of each of the petitioners must be the close relative or their family member, who will file affidavit before the court below giving complete genealogy showing his or her relationship with the petitioners. Further, after their release in this case, if the petitioners are again found to be involved in criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)