: 1 : FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CONTEMPT PETITION NO.366 OF 2008 -------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders of Coram, appearances, Court’s . orders or directions and . Registrar’s orders . -------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Manoj Prajapati i/b M/s.R.J. Singh & Co. for the Petitioner. Mr.D.M. Gupte for the Respondents. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 17TH NOVEMBER, 2008. P.C. : 1. Mr.Gupte, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents states that the Respondents genuinely and bona-fide construed the order to mean that no further articles of their ought to be brought upon the suit premises. They did not understand the order to mean that their articles ought not to remain in the premises. However, the order dated 29.4.2008 of which contempt is alleged clearly prevents them from keeping their articles or belonging in the suit : 2 : premises. I will presume that the order was bona-fide misunderstood by the Respondents on this occasion. This is in view of Mr.Gupte having fairly stating that in view thereof but without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the Respondents, the Respondents are willing to remove their articles from the suit premises on or before 1.12.2008. He further agrees that in the event of the Respondents failing to do so, the Petitioner shall be at liberty to remove the same entirely at the the Respondents’ risk. 2. The above statements are accepted. I also accept the statement of the Respondents that they will not henceforth, as long as the order dated 29.4.2008 is in operation, enter upon the suit premises or disturb the Petitioner’s possession thereof and will also otherwise comply with the order dated 29.4.2008. These statements are also accepted. 3. The Contempt Petition is accordingly disposed of.