IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.8986 and 9011 of 2009 W.P.No.8986 of 2009 Between: Venkat Swamy Goud, S/o.Chinnaiah Goud, Counter No.5, R/o. Kalvakol Village, Peddakothapalli Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Prohibition & Excise Superintendent, Nagarkurnool At Nagarkurnool, Mahaboobnagar District. 2 The Inspector Prohibition & Excise (SHO) Kollapur At Kollaur, Mahaboobnagar District. .....RESPONDENTS W.P.No.9011 of 2009 Between: Nagender Goud S/o. Chinnaiah Goud R/o. Kalvakol Village, Peddakothapalli Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Prohibition & Excise Superintendent Nagar Kurnool at Nagar Kurnool, Mahaboobnagar District. 2 The Inspector Prohibition & Excise (SHO) Kollapur at Kollapur, Mahaboobnagar District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.B.SAI RAM GOUD Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court made the following : COMMON ORDER: In these two Writ Petitions, the petitioners, who were holders of TFT licenses of Kalvakol Village, Peddakothapalli Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District, assailed separate orders dated 09-04-2009 passed by respondent No.1 whereby their TFT licenses have been cancelled on the ground of adulteration. At the hearing, Sri B.Sai Ram Goud, learned Counsel for the petitioners, made strenuous efforts to convince this Court that the orders of cancellation impugned in these Writ Petitions are patently arbitrary and illegal. I am, however, not inclined to go into the merits of these submissions because, admittedly, under Section 63 (1) of the A.P.Excise Act, 1968, the petitioners have a right of appeal to the Deputy Commissioner of Excise concerned. The petitioners have not made out any case to allow them to bypass the said statutory remedy, which is, undoubtedly, efficacious. Therefore, both these Writ Petitions are dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to file appeals before the Deputy Commissioner concerned. If such appeals are filed within a period of three weeks from today, the same shall be entertained and decided by the appellate authority objectively and on the basis of the material available on record, without raising any objections regarding limitation. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petitions, WPMP.Nos.11747 and 11787 of 2009 filed by the petitioners for interim relief are disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 3rd June, 2008 LUR