IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12827 of 2011 Rajiv Kumar S/O Late Ayodhya Sao R/O Vill.- Alapur, P.S.- Lakhisarai, Distt.- Sekhpura ……………. Petitioner Versus 1. The Union Of India Through The Director General Of Police C.R.P.F. 2. The Director General Of Police C.R.P.F. 3. The Inspector General R.A.F., C.R.P.F., Jharkhand, Jamshedpur 4. The Commandant 106 Battalion, R.A.F./C.R.P.F., Jamshedpur, Jharkhand 5. The Director General Of Police R.A.F., Mokamaghat 6. The Commandant C.R.P.F., Mokamaghat ………………. Respondents ---------------------------------- 05. 09.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the Respondent-Union of India. Court fails to understand that for a simple information, which could have been obtained at the cost of Rs. 15/- under the Right to Information Act, a Writ Application has been filed and that too of a roving kind. Let the petitioner file an application under Right to Information Act as to what decision has been taken on the question of his compassionate appointment. The respondents will respond to the same within a time-frame in terms of the Act. Writ is otherwise dismissed. SKM (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)