IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.629 of 2005 (M/S) Pradeep Walia ..… Petitioner Versus Civil Judge (Junior Division) & another ….. Respondents Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the petitioner MR. Sudhir Kumar, Brief Holder for respondent no.1 Mr. Pankaj Chaturvedi, Adv. holding brief of Mr. Rakesh Thapliyal, Advocate for the respondent no.2 Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought writ in the nature of certiorari calling for the records and setting aside the order dated 23.4.2005 (Annexure-3) passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Dehradun, whereby the said court decided the issue no.6 of court fees and issue no.7 of limitation, in favour of the plaintiff. So far as issue no.6 is concerned, statutory remedy to file an appeal u/s 6(a) of Court Fees Act is available to petitioner and with regard to issue no.7, remedy of revision lies before the revisional court. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of the alternative remedy available to the petitioner. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy before appropriate forum, if so advised. Interim order dated 22.6.2005, passed by this Court, stands vacated. (B.S. Verma, J.) 28.3.2011 RG