Crl. Misc. No. M-37504 of 2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-37504 of 2010 Date of Decision: December 21, 2010 Neelam …..Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and others …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.S.N. Pillania, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Vide impugned order the revisional Court examining the legality and propriety of the order of framing charges against all the accused arraigned as petitioners in FIR under Sections 406, 498A and 506 IPC opted to discharge Nisha and Sunita, respondents No.2 and 3, the sisters of Surender Singh. Crl. Misc. No. M-37504 of 2010 [2] Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that despite there being material against respondents No.2 and 3, they have been wrongly discharged by revisional Court. I have heard counsel for the petitioner, gone through the contents of the FIR and I am of the opinion that there are vague allegations against respondent No.3 Sunita, the married sister of Surender Singh and respondent No.2- Nisha, the unmarried sister of Surender Singh. It appears that in an attempt to rope in the entire family members in the criminal case, all the relations of Surender Singh have been made accused. The day, date and time of any incident in which the petitioner had been maltreated by respondents No.2 and 3 has not been specified. No ground is made out for interference in the impugned order. Dismissed. Nothing mentioned in this order will prejudice the rights of the petitioner during trial of the other accused. December 21, 2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE