IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.603 of 2011 SMT. RAM PUKARI DEVI, Daughter of Jageshwar Thakur, wife of Nagendra Mishra, resident of village Salaha, P.O. Jalalpur, P.S. Musahari, District Muzaffarpur. .............Petitioner. Versus 1. SMT. KUSUM DEVI , daughter of late Jageshwar Thakur, wife of Girijanandan Singh, resident of village Gokula, P.S. Paroo, District Muzaffarpur. 2. Smt. Siya Dulari Devi, daugther of late Jageshwar Thakur, wife of Suraj Deo Singh, resident of village Chhajan, P.S. Kurhani, District Muzaffarpur. 3. Madhuri Devi widow of late Ramlakhsan Thakur 4. Sushil Kumar Son of late Ramlakhsan Thakur 5. Amaresh Kumar Son of late Ramlakhsan Thakur 6. Indu Devi Daughter of late Ramlakhsan Thakur 7. Sudha Devi Daughter of late Ramlakhsan Thakur 8. Kamani Devi Daughter of late Ramlakhsan Thakur 9. Maheshwar Thakur Son of late Jamuna Thakur 10. Smt. Sarojani Devi Wife of Maheshwar Thakur 11. Rajendra Thakur Son of late Jamuna Thakur 12. Pramod Thakur Son of late Jamuna Thakur All residents of Village Patahi Bishwanath, P.O. Patahi, P.S. & District Muzaffarpur 13. Mrityunjai Kumar Thakur Son of late Deonarain Thakur, resident of Village Danapur, P.O., P.S. & District Muzaffarpur. 14. Munni Devi wife of Mukteshwar Singh, resident of village Rehua, P.S. Mushahari, District Muzaffarpur. 15. Ram Kumari Devi wife of Dhirendra Singh resident of village Chintamanpur, P.S. Pipara, District East Champaran. 16. Chandeshwar Thakur Son of Girbal Thakur, resident of Village Patahi Bishwanath, P.O. Patahi, P.S. & District Muzaffarpur .................Opposite Parties. ----------- 2/ 23.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The present application has been filed for restoration of Civil Revision No. 777 of 2010 which stood 2 dismissed due to partial compliance of the per-emptory order dated 02.12.2010 passed by this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of order dated 02.12.2010, passed in the aforesaid Civil Revision No. 777 of 2010, requisites etc. for issuance of notices under registered cover with A/D were filed well within the prescribed time. However, talbana as also the requisites for issuance of notices to the opposite parties by ordinary process could be filed belatedly. For the reasons disclosed in the present petition, the prayer for restoration of the aforesaid Civil Revision application, which has been treated to have been dismissed due to partial compliance of order dated 02.12.2010, is allowed. The Civil Revision application is restored to its original file. Let the requisites filed by the petitioner for issuance of notices upon the opposite parties be accepted. The Office may take steps for issuance of notices under both processes upon the opposite parties, as directed earlier. Anjani/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J )