IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1907 of 2010 RAVIKANT SRIVASTAVA SON OF LATE SACHCHIDANAND SRIVASTAVA, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- SAGUNA MORE, DANAPUR, P.S. DANAPUR, DISTRICT PATNA. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 17.3.2010. Heard Mr. Rana Pratap Singh, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner, who is in custody in connection with Aurangabad Town P.S. Case No.301 of 2009 for the offences under Sections 364, 342, 376, 506, 420, 120B of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of bail. While pressing the bail petition, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that it is a peculiar case in which the informant had made a complaint that she was taken by this petitioner and she was with this petitioner for almost three months. Subsequently, by using the telephone of this petitioner, the informant informed her father and thereafter, her father came and rescued the informant. Even though, as per the informant, she was rescued in the first week of July, 2009, without any plausible - 2 - N.H./ explanation, the present F.I.R. was lodged almost after expiry of 28 days. Learned Senior Counsel submits that on perusal of the F.I.R. itself, it appears that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also brought on record several documents to impress upon the court that this case has been filed maliciously and with oblique motive. Without going into the merit of the case, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Aurangabad in Aurangabad Town P.S. Case No.301 of 2009. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)