1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7058 OF 2009 Suryakant Pundalik Patil. ..Petitioner. Vs. The Chief Security & Vigilance Officer and anr. ..Respondent. Mrs.Seema Sarnaik for the Petitioner. Mr.G.S.Hegde for the Respondent No.2. CORAM :R.S.MOHITE, J. DATE: 20TH NOVEMBER,2009 PC: 1 This petition has been filed against the order passed by the Industrial Court dismissing the employee s complaint under MRTP & PULP Act. Petitioner challenged the transfer order dated 13.3.2008 before the Industrial Court Nashik. Initially, the employer took the stand that the employee was not workman. That issue was carried upto this court where the matter was remanded to the Industrial Court. After remand, it was decided in favour of the workman and interim relief staying the transfer was granted. Employer carried the 2 matter upto this Court and this court after vacating the interim order allowed the employee to make a representation for a fresh posting at a nearer place. Thereafter, the workman made such a representation and now in super-cession of the earlier transfer order, a fresh order has been passed transferring him from Nasik to Ahmednagar instead of Sindhudurga. In view of the changed circumstances, on a precepie, the complaint was dismissed as infructuous as transfer from Nashik to Sindhudurg was cancelled. It is also noticed that the workman has been granted liberty to challenge the new order in accordance with law. No fault can be found with the impugned order. Advocate appearing for the respondent No.2 makes a statement that if any fresh complaint is filed within four weeks from today then he will not raise the plea of limitation. With the aforesaid liberty, petition is disposed off. (R.S.MOHITE, J.)