CRM No. M 35089 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 35089 of 2010 Date of decision: 21.04.2011 Gurmit Singh ........ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. B S Bhinder, Advocate for the petitioner Ms Gurveen H Singh, Addl. A G Punjab for the respondent State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under section 482 Cr.P.C and under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of appropriate directions to respondents No. 1 to 4 to investigate the case and enforce law in FIR No. 30 dated 10.04.2001 under Sections 307, 324, 323, 506, 148, 149 IPC, P S Noormahal as respondent No. 5 along with other co-accused after committing cognizable offence on 09.04.2010, roaming freely without any fear inspite of anticipatory bail dismissed by the Sessions Judge as well as by this Hon'ble High Court in CRM M 14655 of 2010 on 18.05.2010, Reply by way of affidavit of Raj Balwinder Singh, PPS, DSP, CRM No. M 35089 of 2010 2 Sub Division, Phillaur, District Jalandhar (Rural) on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 4 has been filed. The same is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition is rendered infructuous in view of said reply in para 5 . Dismissed as having become infructuous. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 21.04.2011 mohan