1 pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Suit No. 1676 of 1992 Shravan Kumar Indian Minor .. Plaintiff v/s. Jagdish Gurbani & Ors. ..Defendants Mr.C.A.Shukla i/b. B.S.Chandani for the Plaintiff. Ms. Ratna Bhargavan for the Defendant No.2 CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 19th March, 2010 P.C. : 1. The defendant no.1 has expired long back. His heirs are not brought on record. Suit abates so far as defendant no.1 is concerned. 2. Learned Advocate for the plaintiff applies for withdrawal of the suit as against defendant no.3. Suit is allowed to be withdrawn as against defendant no.3. There shall be no order as to costs. 3. Consent terms dated today i.e.19.3.2010 between the plaintiff and the defendant no.2, signed by the parties and their respective advocates are 2 taken on record and marked “X” for identification. There shall be a decree in terms of consent terms, with no order as to costs. 4. Refund of Court fees is granted as per rules. 5. In view of the above order Summons for Judgment No.423 of 2009 does not survive and is allowed to be withdrawn with no order as to costs. [R.Y.GANOO, J.]