C.M. No.9110 of 2009 and -1- CWP No.20492 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.M. No.9110 of 2009 and CWP No.20492 of 2008 Date of Decision: 25.5.2009 Dr. Veena Chugh ...Petitioner V E R S U S State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present: Mr. J. S. Bedi, Advocate and Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana for respondent No.1. Mr. R. K. Malik, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sajjan Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. AJAY TEWARI J. (ORAL) C.M. No.9110 of 2009 C.M. allowed. CWP No.20492 of 2008 Rejoinder of the replication filed is taken on record. The petitioner who was the senior most Medical Officer of the State has challenged the action of the respondents in promoting respondent No.2 as Director General Health Services. She had also impugned the action by which her post has been upgraded to that of Director General Health Services-II. The petitioner is also aggrieved of having been placed C.M. No.9110 of 2009 and -2- CWP No.20492 of 2008 in a situation where respondent No.2 has started exercising administrative control over her. The next grievance of the petitioner is that respondent No.2 by virtue of his appointment as Director General Health Services is getting higher emolument than the petitioner who otherwise is concededly senior to him. Learned Senior Deputy Advocate General has very fairly conceded that these grievances of the petitioner can be redressed. He has agreed that the nomenclature of the post of the petitioner would be termed as Director General Health Services-I while that of respondent No.2 would be termed as Director General Health Services-II. He has further stated that respondent No.2 shall exercise no administrative control over the petitioner. He has further accepted that respondent No.2 is being granted some honoraria which has come to the notice of the Government now and Government shall review the same and shall take steps to ensure that those honoraria are withdrawn. With these observations, this writ petition is disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) May 25, 2009 JUDGE ashish