IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9510 of 2008 SITAI DAS BIDIO & ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 02.5.2008. Heard. Amongst others it was alleged in the complaint case that there has been physical torture of the complainant. However, cognizance under Section 307 IPC has not been taken. Though cognizance under Section 498A IPC has been taken but there appears to be no allegation as to existence of evidence pertaining to physical or mental torture except those which were alleged in the body of the complaint for framing of charge under Section 379 IPC but the same was not insisted upon at the time of enquiry. In the circumstances I think a case for grant of anticipatory bail to the father-in-law and mother-in-law has been made out. The application succeeds. In the event of arrest or surrender of the petitioners within six weeks from today, the petitioners, namely, Sitai Das Bidio, Kabutari Devi be enlarged on bail on their furnishing bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the - 2 - satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jhanjharpur, District Madhubani in connection with Complaint Case No. 503 of 2007 dated 2.7.2007 / T.R. No. 2474 of 2007 subject to the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. dk ( Barin Ghosh, J. )