^ .1. ^} IN THE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C. N0.2-0 OOF igg) ^o V\ ^-<g,"t^( IN SECOND APPEAL N0. /2010 (PR No.2216) IN THE MATTER OF: ^IlglS APPLICANTS/ APPELLANTS ^^q '•• ^.^•^^v" ^' "^^: ..^' Subhash Agrawal S/o Late Shri Banwari Lal Agrawal, Agedabout51 years, R/o Industrial Ward, - P.0. -Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari (C.G.) ^^ ...&p>' NON-APPLICANT/ RESPONDENTS VERSUS The General Manager, Sout^Eastern Railway, Garden Reach, Kolkata, West Bengal, ^ The Estate Officer; South East RailWay Management Compound, W.R.S. Colony, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Union of India, Through Chief Manager, South East Railway, Garden Reach/ Kolkata, West Bengal, MISCELL^N^OUS CIVIL CASE FOR RESTORATION OF. S.A, N0. /2010 (P.R.NO':2216) ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 19^f0.2010 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN THE CASE OF SUBHASH AGRAWAL VS. THE GENERAL MANAGER & ORS. -i^-1 3?7^?r ^r'f^rhF ^?T 3?T^T sb^lJcb )<— <IPKfT ^Hi^t 'T^ ~^\WW^,W^\W\VD, ^<r\W^ l-C-C- ^o/ii ^ -^ 200^ ^TI^T Xf5j^ ( ^i^^T) ^dTW ^1^311^1 S.B. Hon'Me Shri Justice Prd 09.05.2011. chl<<f<n41yl ^TT^lf ^* 'feT^t Tf^T^R ^T^tRm ^TT^T ishant Kumar Mishra Shri Rakesh Dubey. coijinsel for the applicani Leamed counsel for th^ applicant subrNts that defeult poNed out by the Registry has been rem4ved. Heard learned couns^l for the applicant on IA. No.1 for condonation of delay in filing tl|ie application for restoration. On due consideration, IjA. No. 1 is allowed. Delay in filing the restor|ation application is condoned. Heard tearned counsel for the applicant This is an applicatfon flor restoration of Second Appesrt (PR) No. 2216/201Owhich was dismissj&d for want of prosecufion by this Court on 19/10/2010. The reasons assigned flor default in appearance is consktered and found to be sufRcient. Accordingly, the M.C.Cjis allowed. Second Appeal (PR) ^o. 2216/2010 is restored to its original number. Sd//- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Ife