1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.506 OF 2010 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.507 OF 2010 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.508 OF 2010 (Dinesh P. Kejriwal vs. Rupshi Patel & Anr) Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Ms. Suvarna Vait i/by Mr. R.B. Mokashi for petitioner. Mr. Dharmendra Joshi Advocate for respondent no.1. Mrs. G.P. Mulekar, APP for State. Coram : Smt. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. Date : 11th August 2011 PC :- Both the counsel state that pursuant to the order dated 10th June 2011, the petitioner has paid a sum of Rs.3,25,000/- to the respondents today. The present proceedings are arising out of a complaint filed under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act by the respondent against the petitioners. In 2 view of the compromise of the dispute between the parties, the proceedings are allowed to be compounded. The petitions are allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The petitioner is acquitted of the offence under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act in original complaint No. 759/SS/2005, 760/SS/2005, 761/SS/2005 and 762/SS/2005. (Judge)