IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 19203 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: December 3, 2008 Vijay Pal Singh Besoya …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH Present: Mr. Rajendar Chhokar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. J.P. Bhatt, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. The claim of the petitioner in the instant petition is that he has applied for allotment of 10 marla plot in Sector 23, Sonipat. It has been alleged that the draw of lot was held on 22.8.2006, however, his application has not been considered, which was carrying Application No. 1095641. In the reply filed on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 and 3 it has been clarified that there was a clerical mistake and the name of the petitioner, in fact, was put in the draw of lot. The master list of the relevant portion has been produced on record as Annexure R-1. The name of the petitioner with address was shown against C.W.P. No. 19203 of 2006 Registration No. BSNP007503 though his application No. was wrongly mentioned as ‘1095464’ instead of ‘1095641’. Even there is slight spelling mistake in the father’s name of the petitioner, which has been mentioned as ‘J.S. VASOYA’ instead of ‘J.S. BESOYA’. In the draw of lot the aforementioned application was considered but it was not in the list of successful applicants. In view of the above, the grievance of the petitioner does not survive as the name of the petitioner has been duly considered in the draw of lot although there were some clerical mistakes. The writ petition fails and the same is accordingly dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (JORA SINGH) December 3, 2008 JUDGE Pkapoor 2