MKWfMf e: ./* '-'^.\°c IN THE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (•CHHATTISGARH') WRIT PETITION N0.2.S l0 OF 2006 PETITIONER ^^> ^^ **e' . .-?'-.''lJ\\'-<i' ''•?'' v^^"t .'$•' y <<%/"" v^-" RESPONDENTS / Kishan Asawa, Son of Late Shri Ganga Bisen Asawa, aged about 68 years, Resident of Ring Road Namnakala, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). l^- ^ ^}^^ /f-i/fl's!TS<il^%.. y.»/•^-^—^ - ?A%. -g^A * | l^^^^l >'^a<-*\./ VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 3. The Tahsildar, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, (C.G.). 4. The Dainik Nava Bharat Through: Its Managing Director, Cotton Market, Nagpur (Maharashtra). 5. The Nava Bharat Press, Bilaspur, Through: Its Manager, Bilaspur (C.G.). 6. The Commissioner, Regional Provident Fund Office, Nava Bharat Complex, Raipur (C.G.). ;.J»w's£sxs£^ewsws^w^ues»»sf,s,t^^ssf WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI, PROHIBITION ETC. XI-HC-22 ~5^ "ill^lc)4), aTil'y'is, Rfli+iy an^l^iT R-<i.<* sn^r sriif?if?ti Barre ^ '^ <? iiiCTi aiiich 'fN^ST' sn^i '^nw 'afN 11.S-200S Sh.ri V.K. Pandey, counsel forf.h^ petitioner. Shri Ashutosh Kachchwaha, SSate/respondentsNo.1 to3. 'Heard both the counsel. The main grievance of the det resDondents No.4 and 5. When the p /"t.^., .-A .,,i«^,-.-. r^^ »-i /^-< QFtr^ ins i-aDour L/QUH wnsrs r<s.^,&*4,yuu Even the recovery' certfficate was issu sent to resDonderit No.3 fcr recoven/ in letitioner is that he was working with fetitioner's claim was not paid, he rnov'ed l- wss ciSifHcQ 3n€i ssme waS SiiOWeCi. ^d by tne Coitector, Bliaspur whlch was vears resoondent. No.3 is not taRirj rsspondents No.4and 5. . - petltioner may be allowed to mate a .-equesting for taking steps for recover^ N6.4 & 5, and they be dlrected to pass (( Having hearci iearned counsei facts snd circumstances of the case, a represeniatio" to respona'ents No.2 ^ and in t'jm, respondents No.2 & 3 3re represerrtation made by tne petitioner receipt or representation. Wltli the direction aforesaid, thd 'artles are entitied for certified i^opy'of this order. <=M<4ld^1Ti '^TF^ff ^ f^Sl' <Fy|-^i< '^aipOTsn^r Govt. Advocate takes nottee for the the year 2003. Even aSer the lapse of 3 ^ steps to reoover the amount from !n the clreumsiances. learned ccjunsel ror trse petltloner su&miRed tiiat Sne epresentation to respondents No.2 & 3 of the amount due against respondents irder on nis represeniatlon witHm a perlod or' 4 weeks to which iearned counsei for) respondents No. 1 to 3 has no oisjeciion. 'or the parties and hayinQ resard to the a '-2?» prayer macie by ieapned counsei ror thi petitioner Is Just, fair and reasonable, ti)ierefore, the petitianer is allowed to make |t 3 within a period 'of 10 deys from today [directed toJakeapprQpriate steps on the [yithin another 2 months from the date of petition stands disposed of. Sd.i- i_.C. Bhaaoo judge ['qt^tfig^