IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.22230 of 2010 Date of Decision : December 14, 2010. M/s The Jalandhar Transport Society (P) Ltd. .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Munish Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner who is a Transport Society is aggrieved by the action of respondent Nos.5 to 7 who are compelling it to pay the Bus Adda charges at a higher rate for availing the facilities of the Bus Stop at Dasuya, District Hoshiarpur. Respondent Nos.5 to 7 are the contractors for the recovery of Bus Adda fee and appears to have got an order dated 16.7.2010 (Annexure P-4) from the Civil Court at Dasuya, which entitles them to charge the fee in dispute at a higher rate. Since the Bus Adda fee at a higher rate is being charged from the petitioner-society in terms of the order passed by the Civil Court, in my considered view, the appropriate remedy for the petitioner would be to become party to the pending civil suit and seek vacation of the injunction C.W.P.No .22230 of 2010 2 order and/or challenge the same before the Appellate Court, if so advised. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to apply for its impleadment in the civil suit being an aggrieved party and seek appropriate relief from the Civil Court at Dasuya. It is directed that in case the petitioner moves an application, the same may be disposed of within a period of two weeks from the date of its filing. Dasti. December 14, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE