WPMS No. 827 of 2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. M.S. Tyagi, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Narendra Bali, Advocate for the respondents. The defendant’s application 33 C-2 praying that the commission be issued so that the status of the properties is given to the Court was rejected by the trial court against which a revision was field by the defendant which was also dismissed. The defendant, being aggrieved by the aforesaid order, has filed the present writ petition. At the moment the court below is considering the injunction application filed by the plaintiff, in the event, the injunction application is decided and the defendant is aggrieved, it would be open to the defendant to move an appropriate application again for issuance of the commission. At this stage, the Court does not find it fit to interfere in the impugned order. The writ petition is dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 04.08.2010 Shiv