IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP (T) No. 15467 of 2008 Decided on: 22.6.2011 Dharam Pal …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and ors. …..Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice (oral). The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:- “(i) That the respondents may be directed to grant work charged status to the applicant w.e.f. 1.1.2002 with all benefits incidental thereof such as full back wages, seniority & pay fixation etc. from the due date.” 2. According to the petitioner, his case is covered by the decision of Supreme Court in Mool Raj Upadhyaya Vs. State of H.P. and others 1994 Supplement (2) S.C.C. 313. Petitioner submits that he would file an appropriate representation furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for him to do so. The first respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, 2 in light of the decision referred to above within a period of two months from the date of production of a copy of the judgment referred to above and a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the first respondent. 3. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice (Justice V.K. Sharma) Judge. June 22, 2011 (LSP/pankaj)