t9 ^)^r ^ i>|B|(t Binch lihil €< ^ IN THE HIQH CCXJET OF CHH&TTISQ&BH AT BIL&SPUE W,P. B'0.2K13/2004 PSTITIQSiEB ; Shri S.S.Ganjeer, aged 39 years, S/o. K.B.Gaiy eer, Sut) Engineer (Clvil), PTO, Sub Divislea, ; ~ Eai&er, B/o. BTI Colony, Kan&er Versas SPOTOESITS y.%•^^- :1. State of C.G., fhroagB the Secretary Pu'blic Worfcs Departmen-fc State 6f C.G., D.E.S.Bhavaa .: Raipur. ' 2. Addttional Secret&iy, State of' C.Q., Public Works Department, D.K.S.Bhavan, Baipur. PETI33:(B:5HD@ABTICLE 226/227 OF THE C<SSTITEJTIW OF CTBXA ^•\ '-3;; "$- "^ MT-HC-22 'S^ -'<141<'1'1<, »TJI<;<'IS, RclKiy *nwn aitn'^ 3n^r"tj^ ^.^L.^.S^..-^ 200 ^ sitetW l<-fi* ^i^ ^{T?tT; ^i^ sii^i tawTrfw 26.11.2004:- Shri Anup Majumdar, counsel for Shri Satish Gupta, Dy.G.A. advance copy. AppficattonfQrurgenthearingis Heard. |the petitioner. for the State/respondents, on Ulowed. Leamedcounsel forthe petitione^ to transfer of the petttioner. HeJurthe|r been transferreel from Kanker to <| 20.09.2004 (Annexure - P/1). He al^ woridng as Sub-Engineer (Chril), Katlker submitted that the petitioner has been | policy laid by the State Govemment in| person shaH not be transferred until yearsof service in the asheduled area| scheduted area and accoFdinfltothe continue for three years. Leamect place of the petjtioner no person (as beeft relisved and he has joined at ti|s[ fhis histant petition. Hei also submits t| may be given .an oppprtMnity affilmg Ithe cdmpetent authority of the Fespon<| In its own merits in accordance with lav(r <tii<iT(n?fti *iiH<af^ fsl<) <f^^.i< ^ slfigtT gi^l thle ^- submits that the mtrtter relates • sutxnits that ths petttioner has ^undardhehi vide oider dated to submits that the prttttoner is Leamed counsel ftuther )transferred against the transfer Iwhfch it has been statedthat a |and unless he completes three The petjtjoner wss serving iin policy fte was attoiwsd to^ ftrther submtttsd that liri posted. Ttie pettttoner^has lti3insteiTe<t^place after ffling 0( |iat for the presert tHe pettidittr idetailed representaUon beiSoee (ents, wtuch S'latt.toe cortsidered tdansfer cbonsel tteen [»:^3^ -4. •i !i "T-n-i i-itmmmitiniin XI-HC.231^ ;3 |"<tltl|SI<), ®'gl'9al®,iwiWK.' ifflffipgpnw S.&Si'S... ••^200^ SII^TBiF ft'ii.'* sn^i sh*ii<ft ^if^d. sn^r SSITW ^fet Maving cQnsiaered and wl(h<j merits of the ease, in the opinion o1 served tf a direetion is given to representation raising his grievances the respondents along wfth a copy <j 15 days, and on such represenf| authority of the respondents shall d4 accordance wjth law as early as po| from the date of reeeipt ofthe repre^ Consequently M.W.P.No.4249 ct)l<iI<n<i1Ti^W<^'^ ^^'^i^K ^3lfWt3fli?I |ut sxpresslng any opinlon on the this Court, ends ofjurtfeewill be |he petitioner to makea detailed before the eompetent authortty of (fthe petition and this oiifer.within lation being filed, the competent lcidethe same onitsownmeritsin ssible preferably wtfithln two months lentation. Withthe aforesaid observatioits.this petltionjstandsdisposed of. /04 also stands dtspo$ed of. Sd/- Ac«ngChiefJustice IH;