IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-24403 of 2009 Date of Decision:5.4.2010 Piara Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. R.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. Mr. Gursimran Singh, Advocate for the complainant. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) On 12.1.2010, it was stated by learned State counsel that although the petitioner has joined the investigation but the money is yet to be recovered, whereas, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was ready to settle the entire matter. On 16.3.2010, more time was sought to enable the petitioner to settle the dispute. Today, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has neither given any instructions nor contacted him. The allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner cheated the complainant and took money from the complainant with the promise that his grand son shall be enrolled in the navy. The concession of anticipatory bail cannot be extended to the petitioner. Dismissed. 5.4.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE