IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14935 of 2011 RAM BILASH SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 23.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the state. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was granted bail before cognizance but after cognizance and commitment, neither any notice nor any process was ever served upon the petitioner but in spite of that, his bail bonds was cancelled and he was declared absconder. Subsequently, the petitioner was arrested by the police at the strength of warrant of arrest issued by the court and accordingly, he was remanded in the case on 13.10.2010 and since then he is languishing in jail custody. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Ram Bilash Sharma be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Madhepur (Bheja) P.S. Case No. 93 of 1994 corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 205 of 1995 to the satisfaction of F.T.C. No.-III, Madhubani subject to condition that one of the sureties shall be close relative of the petitioner. Furthermore, the petitioner shall attend the trial court on each and every 2 date physically for a period of nine months and if he fails to do so without any valid cause, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)