IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11948 of 2009 KAILU SAHNI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 20.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Petitioner is in custody in relation to Jamalpur P.S. Case No. 32 of 2007 for the offence under sections 302, 201 and 120B of the I.P.C. and sections ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Allegation is that for non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry the daughter of the informant was burnt to death and her body disposed of. The case came to be instituted and investigated and prima facie found to be true. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that even according to the allegation made in the FIR at best he had only helped in disposal of the body but was not involved in the actual commission of murder and therefore, he deserves consideration of bail; more so when some of the similarly situated co-accused with similar allegation, namely, Bachchi Sahni and Baua Sahani have been enlarged on bail. In view of the above stated circumstances, let the petitioner, namely, Kailu Sahni be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Biraul at Benipur, District- Darbhanga. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)