[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL W.P. NO.2112 OF 2008 Smt.Tandrali Pathak and Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.Ravindra A.Lokhande advocate for Petitioners Mr.S.R.Shinde A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : NOVEMBER 18, 2008 DATE : NOVEMBER 18, 2008 DATE : NOVEMBER 18, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the petitioner no.1-wife. 2. The learned Magistrate had directed the husband to pay maintenance of Rs.10,000/- to each of the applicants-petitioners herein i.e. wife and two children from 25.6.2008. Being aggrieved thereby, the husband-respondent herein, challenged the said order before the Sessions Court. The learned Sessions Judge stayed the impugned order on the condition that the appellant-husband to deposit Rs.1,05,000/- in the Court till 30.9.2008 and the [-2-] appellant-husband was further directed to pay monthly maintenance of Rs.15,000/- to respondent nos.2 and 3 till the decision of the appeal on or before 5th day of every month. Being aggrieved by the said order, this petition has been preferred by the wife and children. 3. It is an admitted fact that the amount of Rs.1,05,000/- has been deposited by the respondent-husband as directed by the Sessions Court. In addition thereto, it is an admitted fact that the respondent-husband is also depositing amount of Rs.15,000/- on or before 5th day of each month. It is seen that the order is an interim order and it is not a final order and proceedings are still going on before the Sessions Court. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere at this stage and I am only inclined to pass direction that the learned Sessions Judge to dispose of the case as expeditiously as possible. 4. Petition is disposed of with the aforesaid direction. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]