IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8768 OF 2005 M/s.Rajendra Trading Co. .. Petitioner Vs. Tasgaon Taluka Sah.Kharedi Vikri Sangh Ltd.,Tasgaon & Another..Respondent Mr.R.V.More for the petitioner Mr.T.S.Ingale for the respondent no.2 CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J S.U.KAMDAR, J S.U.KAMDAR, J DATED : 22ND DECEMBER, 2005 DATED : 22ND DECEMBER, 2005 DATED : 22ND DECEMBER, 2005 P.C.: . The learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will prefer an appeal against the order dt.25.7.1996 passed by the Liquidator under section 105 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 and does not wish to press the present petition at this stage. It is clarified that if an appeal is filed within 3 weeks from today the order impugned herein dt.16.11.05 is not to be implemented. If an appeal is not filed within that period, the order dt.16.11.05 will come into force. The Registrar will decide the appeal and application for condonation for delay, if any, on its own merits without being influenced by the impugned order passed in the present proceeding. If the appeal is filed Registrar to decide the same on or before 28.2.06. It is also open to the petitioner to file appropriate proceeding for claiming his right of tenancy if so permissible in law. Petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs.