IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA COMPANY APPEAL NO. 2 OF 2009 MR. SERGEY IVANOV THROUGH ATTORNEY JAMES MICHEL MARQUA ... Appellant Versus M/S. ARTLIBORI RESORTS PVT. LTD. AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Nitin Sardessai, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. Vikram Varma, Advocate for the Respondents. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 13th March, 2009 ORAL ORDER: Heard learned Counsel on behalf of the parties. 2. On behalf of the respondents, an objection was taken that this appeal could not have been filed by the attorney as he had no valid power in his favour. This appeal has been filed challenging order dated 15/02/2008. Both the parties having disputed their share holding in the Company, the learned Company Law Board was pleased to appoint Investigative auditors. The auditors so appointed have already filed a report. 3. On behalf of the appellant, Shri Sardessai submits that the parties be remitted to the Company Law Board with liberty to the appellant herein to raise all objections as available in law to the said report of the auditors including the appointment of Koshi and George, Chartered Accountants, as auditors. Counsel on behalf of the respondents has no objection to this arrangement. 4. Consequently, the appeal is disposed of with liberty to the appellant to file objections to the said report of the investigative auditors, as are available to them in law including the objections as to the appointment of Koshi and George as auditors. The learned Company Law Board to decide the objections in accordance with law, before deciding any other issue in the petition, as agreed by the parties. Objections to be filed within 3 weeks. Parties to appear before the Company Law Board at New Delhi on 3/04/2009 at 10.00 a.m. Appeal disposed of on the above terms. N. A. BRITTO, J. NH