IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT APPEAL NO : 2398 of 2005 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 24/10/2005 in WP NO : 13318 OF 1999 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 Tuljaram Singh (Since died) per L.Rs (Appellant No.3 herein) 2 Man Singh S/o.Balaram Singh R/o.H.No.3-6-677, Street No.10, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad. 3 Chotam Singh S/o.Late Tuljaram Singh R/o H.No.3-6-677, Street No.10, Himayatnagar, Hyderabad - 29. 4 Man Singh S/o Late of Late Balram Singh R/o H.No.3-6-677, Street No.10, Himayatnagar, Hyderabad - 29. ..... APPELLANT(S) AND 1 State of Andhra Pradesh rep by Joint Collector, Hyderabad (Appellate Abolition of Inams Act 1955) 2 Revenue Divisional Officer,Hyderabad Primary Authority under the A.P.(T.A) Abolition and Inams Act 1955. 3 Govinddas S/o.Mukund Das R/o 4-3-347, Bank Street, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad. 4 Shyam Sunsdar S/o.Late Balkishan Das R/o 4-3-348, Bank Street, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad. 5 Prabhu Charan Das S/o.late Dwaraka Das (Died) per L.Rs. R/o 4-3-348, Bank Street, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad. 6 Prabhu Charan Das S/o.Late Dwaraka Das (Died) Per L.Rs. R/o 4-3-348, Bank Street, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad. 7 Krishna Kumar S/o.late Dwaraka Das R/o 4-3-348, Bank Street, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad. 8 Madan Mohan S/o.Late Dwaraka Das R/o 4-3-348, Bank Street, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad. 9 Suresh Kumar S/o.Late Dwaraka Das R/o 4-3-348, Bank Street, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad. 10 Smt.Aruna Ben W/o.Sri Prabhucharan Das R/o 4-3-348, Bank Street, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad. 11 Brij Gopal S/o. Sri Prabhucharan Das R/o 4-3-348, Bank Street, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad. 12 Pramod S/o. Sri Prabhucharan Das R/o 4-3-348, Bank Street, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad. 13 Sandeep S/o. Sri Prabhucharan Das R/o 4-3-348, Bank Street, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:MR.A.ANANTHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH W.A.M.P.No.3044 of 2008 and Writ Appeal No.2398 of 2005 Oral Judgment: (per D.S.R.Varma, J.) Heard both sides. 2. This writ appeal is directed against the order, dated 24-10-2005, passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in allowing W.P.No.13318 of 1999 filed by respondents 3 to 13 herein by setting aside the orders passed by the Joint Collector as well as primary authority and remanding the matter back to the primary authority for fresh disposal keeping in view the date of vesting as 01- 11-1973, with a further direction to the primary authority to dispose of the case as expeditiously as possible within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the said order. 3. At the stage of hearing of the writ appeal, Sri V.Ramakrishna Reddy, learned Counsel appearing for the appellants and Sri Peri Prabhakar, learned Counsel, representing Sri V.Venkata Ramana, learned Counsel appearing for proposed legal representatives of the deceased appellant No.2 Man Singh-appellants 4 to 6, submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties out of Court amicably. 4. To this effect, the application W.A.M.P(SR).No.122191 of 2008, under Order XXIII, Rules 1 and 3 read with Section 151 C.P.C., has been filed, duly enclosing Memorandum of Compromise, seeking to record the said compromise and to dispose of the writ appeal and dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn in terms of the said memorandum of compromise. 5. Both the parties to the writ appeal are present before this Court. Upon being questioned by this Court, both the parties have stated that they are fully aware of the contents of the Memorandum of Compromise that has been pressed into service, which contains the signatures of both the learned Counsel as well as the parties also. The parties have identified themselves and were also identified by the respective learned Counsel. Therefore, we have no hesitation to disbelieve regarding the compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the said settlement, which is reduced into Memorandum of Compromise, the application W.A.M.P(SR).No.122191 of 2008 is allowed and consequently, the writ appeal W.A.No.2398 of 2005 is allowed and the writ petition W.P.No.13318 of 1999 is dismissed as withdrawn, in terms of the memorandum of compromise. No costs. 7. Registry is directed to append a copy of the said Memorandum of Compromise, which shall form part of this judgment. ____________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA ____________________ JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH 19th November, 2008. Ak ........REGISTRAR To 1. 2.2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WA {MPL}