1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3106 OF 2006 IN REVIEW PETITION ST.NO.9733/2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2284 OF 1993. Managing Director, City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra and others ... Applicants. Versu Utkarsh Mitra Mandal and another ... Respondents. ... Mr.A.S.Bajaj, advocate for the applicants. Mr.V.D.Rakh, advocate for the State. Mr.S.A.Kulkarni, advocate for the Respondent No. 1. ... WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3123 OF 2006 IN REVIEW PETITION ST.NO.9724/2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2561/1990. Managing Director,CIDCO Bombay and another ... Applicants. 2 Versus Dr.Bhalchandra Anandrao Kango and others ... Respondents. ... Mr.A.S.Bajaj, advocate for the applicants. Mrs.R.K.Ladda, Asstt.Govt. Pleader for the State. ... WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3240 OF 2006 IN REVIEW PETITION NO.9740 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3012/1992. Managing Director and others ... Applicants. Versus New Chaitanya Co-operative Housing Society, through its Secretary, Aurangabad and another ... Respondents. ... Mr.A.S.Bajaj, advocate for the applicants. Mr.K.B.Choudhari, Addl. Govt. Pleader for the State. ... CORAM : B.R.GAVAI AND : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,JJ. Date : 05.07.2010. 3 PER COURT 1. These are applications for condonation of delay seeking review of the order passed by this Court dated 12.2.2004. The applications are vehemently opposed by Mr.Kulkarni, on the ground that the delay is inordinate which is not properly explained. 2. Though the delay is inordinate, in the interest of justice, we are inclined to condone the same. The applications are allowed. Delay is condoned. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) (B.R.GAVAI,J.) asp/office/Ca3106.06