(1) WP. 5384.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5384 OF 2010 Vasantlal S/o Chandanmal Bhalgat .. PETITIONER VERSUS Shri Zumbarlal S/o Ghewarchand Bothara and others .. RESPONDENTS Mr.S.S. Gangakhedkar, Advcoate h/f. Mr.R.R. Karpe, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr.S.P. Deshmukh, Advocate for the respondent nos.2 and 3 ... CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 20TH JULY, 2010 ORAL ORDER:- 1. Heard counsel. The petitioner challenges order dated 8th April, 2010 rendered on application (Exh.298) filed in suit bearing R.C.S. 218 of 2010. The petitioner is original defendant. An officer from the Sales Tax office was called as witness at the instance of the petitioner. The petitioner had filed certain documents at exhibit 28 and in order to prove those documents, the witness was put in the witness box. The witness i.e. D.W.7 Janardan Ghorpade was asked certain questions by the counsel (2) WP. 5384.2010 for the plaintiff/respondent. It was the contention of the petitioner that those questions could not be put for want of documents regarding the questions. The objection of the petitioner was overruled. The main question which was objected by the petitioner was as to whether the name of the defendant no.1 was individually recorded as proprietor of the shop and that there had been no entry in the record of the Sales Tax Office to indicate that the shop was a partnership firm. The witness answered these questions. The answer was given on basis of available record which was brought by the witness. The objection raised by the petitioner has been rightly turned down by the trial Court. The impugned order is not perverse. As such no interference is called for. Petition dismissed. Sd/- [V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp