IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43711 of 2010 BHARAT MISTRI S/O VISHUN MISTRI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 14.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 20 of the N.D.P.S. Act and 414 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that only 1 ½ Kg. ganja was recovered from the possession of the co-accused and the petitioner has fair antecedents, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned District and Sessions Judge, Nawada in connection with Govindpur P.S. Case No. 51/2010, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailors shall be the mother of the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address 2 of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)