Civil Revision No. 4229 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 4229 of 2010 Date of Decision: 9.7.2010 Ramesh Kumar …Petitioner Versus Sweety and Others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Grievance of the petitioner is that the trial Court has committed a grave error by allowing the application of the plaintiffs to amend the plaint. Learned counsel submits that by making an amendment in the plaint, nature of the suit has changed. Three daughters of Pushpa Chaudhary have instituted a suit wherein they averred that their mother had purchased a plot measuring 5 marlas vide a registered sale deed dated 21.3.1990. She died on 28.2.1993. It was further pleaded that they were owner in possession of the suit property in equal share and the petitioner/defendant was stranger to the same. The petitioner/defendant had made an attempt to dispossess the plaintiffs from the suit property. It is a case of the plaintiffs that during the pendency of the suit, Civil Revision No. 4229 of 2010 2 the petitioner/defendant took possession of the suit property by erecting a boundary wall on two sides. Since this was a subsequent event which happened during the pendency of suit and the same was sought to be brought on record by amending the plaint. The trial Court, taking into consideration the sale deed Ex.PW.1/C, proved by Krishan Kumar, Clerk, Sub Registrar, Karnal, came to a conclusion that the amendment is necessary as it was an event which happened during the pendency of the suit. The trial Court further opined that this fact can be determined later on when the parties adduce their evidence. Therefore, impugned order dated 21.4.2010, passed by the trial Court, is a well reasoned one. Hence, no interference is warranted in the present revision petition and the same is hereby dismissed in limine. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge July 9, 2010 “DK”