MP 1 CRA186_11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 186 OF 2011 The Chief Officer, Pandharpur Nagar Palika ... Applicant Versus Shri Ashok Balbhima Sonalkar ... Respondent Mr. S. S. Aradhye for Applicant. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. WEDNESDAY, APRIL 06, 2011 P. C. : By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the concurrent orders, that too interlocutory in nature, vide which the learned Trial Court has granted injunction in favour of the respondent- plaintiff and the Appellate Court has confirmed the same. 2. No perversity is noticed in the approach adopted by the learned Trial Court as also by the Appellate Court to warrant interference in the extra-ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Rejected. 3. However, in the facts and circumstances of the case and since the petitioner is a statutory local authority, the hearing is expedited and the learned Trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within a period of six months from today. MP 2 CRA186_11 4. Needless to state that since the observations made by the Trial Court and the Appellate Court, in the orders impugned, are purely upon prima-facie consideration, the learned Trial Court would not be influenced by the same at the stage of the trial. (B.R. GAVAI, J)