1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4202/2011 (SAKHUBAI G. KUMARE & ANOTHER VERSUS SUNIL MAHADEO NAITAM & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.S. Dhore, counsel for the petitioners. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : AUGUST 26, 2011 . Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioners are the parents of one deceased Ujwala, who died in a motor accident. The husband of Ujwala by name Sunil had filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Pandharkawada. In the said proceedings, the petitioners filed an application for joining them as parties on the ground that they were the legal heirs of deceased Ujwala. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, however, by the impugned order dated 08.12.2010, rejected the application filed by the petitioners. The order passed by the Tribunal on 08.12.2010 is just and proper and calls for no interference in exercise of the writ jurisdiction. It is necessary to note that the husband of Ujwala was only entitled to file the Motor Accident Claim Petition in view of the provisions of Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 as Sunil and Ujwala did not have any issues. In this background, the Tribunal rightly rejected the application filed by the parents of Ujwala as they were not entitled to compensation due to her death. 2 In the result, the writ petition fails and is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE APTE