IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 908 of 2006 (M/B) 1. Baljinder Singh S/o Sri Karam Singh 2. Kulvinder Singh S/o Sri Karam Singh R/o Village Ludhpura, P.S. Bazpur District Udham Singh Nagar …..Petitioners Vs 1. State of Uttaranchal through Home Secretary Uttaranchal Govt. Dehradun 2. S.H.O. Bazpur, District Udham Singh Nagar 3. Manjeet Singh S/o Sri Baja Singh R/o Village Rajpura No. 2 P.S. Bazpur District Udham Singh Nagar ….Opp. Parties Sri Dharamveer Sharma, learned senior Advocate assisted by Mohd. Azim, learned counsel for the petitioners. Sri H.C. Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. Hon’ble P.C. Pant, J. Heard Sri Dharamveer Sharma learned senior Advocate assisted by Mohd. Azim, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri H.C. Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. By means of this writ petition the petitioner has sought for following relief:- 1) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 19.07.2006 lodged against the petitioners at Police Station Bazpur, District Udham Singh Nagar as Case Crime No. 2745 of 2006 lodged by opposite party No. 3 under Sections 324, 504, 326 I.P.C. & 25/27 Arms Act. 2) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite party No. 1 and 2 not to arrest the petitioners in connection of F.I.R. dated 19.07.2006 lodged against the petitioners at police station Bazpur, District Udham Singh Nagar as case crime No. 2745 of 2006 lodged by opposite party No. 3 under Sections 324, 504, 326 I.P.C. & 25/27 Arms Act during the pendency of the above writ petition. 3. Consideration the role assigned to the petitioners in the First Information Report as well as the injuries sustained by the injured – Tota Ram, grandfather of the informant, we are not inclined to grant any of the relief mentioned in the writ petition. 4. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed. 5. Consequently, the stay application No. 9685 of 2006 also stands dismissed. 6. However, it is directed that in case, of arrest or surrender before the court concerned by the petitioners, their bail applications shall be heard without unreasonable delay. (P.C. Pant, J.) (B.C. Kandpal, J.) 02.08.2006 ASWAL