IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS THURSDAY, THE 18TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 29TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 4056 of 2010(F) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- K.A. ABDUL MANAF, S/O. AZEEZ, AGED 38 YEARS,KARUPPAMVEED, KEERTHI NAGER, ELAMAKKARA P.O., KOCHI - 24, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CENTRAL ZONE, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALAMASSERY POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY GOVT. PLEADER SHRI. P.N. SUKUMARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 4056 of 2010 F - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 18th day of February, 2010 JUDGMENT Joseph, J. The petitioner has approached this court seeking a direction to the second respondent and his subordinates not to harass the petitioner unnecessarily. A direction is also sought to the first respondent to register a crime against the second respondent based on Ext.P1 complaint, investigate the same and to consider and dispose of Ext.P1. 2. Briefly the case of the petitioner is as follows. The petitioner executed a sale deed with respect to the property owned by the petitioner in favour of one Ansari. There was a liability at that time in connection with the property. The petitioner disclosed this liability at the time of sale and the said amount is deducted from the total sale consideration. It is the W.P.(C).No. 4056 of 2010 2 case of the petitioner that the buyer was aware of the said charge over the property. After the sale, the purchaser did not clear off the liability. It is alleged that the second respondent, hand in glove with Shri.Ansari, is compelling the petitioner to clear off the liability and forcing him to execute a document. 3. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that a petition was received from Shri. Ansari alleging that there was a mortgage on the basis of the prior title deed. The petitioner was called to the police station to dispose of that petition. It is submitted that the petitioner did not co-operate. The petitioner has made his intention clear that he does not intend to settle the matter in the Police Station. 4. It is submitted by the learned Government Pleader that the petitioner will not be called to the Police Station. We record the said submission and close this Writ Petition. (K. M. JOSEPH) Judge (M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS) tm Judge W.P.(C).No. 4056 of 2010 3