1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2827 OF 2009 Shri Ganesh Balu Patil ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr.Girish R. Agrawal for the Applicant. Mr.J.P. Yagnik, APP for the State. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 22, 2009 P.C. :- 1 Heard Counsel for the applicant and APP for the State. 2 This is a second application for bail. The earlier application for bail was rejected on merits on 16th March, 2009. The applicant has been arrested in connection with an offence punishable under Sections 302, 301, 201, 120-B read with 34 of the IPC. 2 3 Learned APP for the State submits that the charge has been framed and the prosecution proposes to examine only five witnesses. 4 In my view, by a detailed order, previous application for bail is rejected on merits and therefore, the second application cannot be entertained since there is no change in the circumstance. However, the trial is expedited. The Sessions Court is directed to decide the case, as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within a period of six months from today. If the trial is not over within six months, liberty is granted to the applicant to apply for bail. 5 The application is disposed of. (V.M. KANADE, J.)