^^ 0 ^ ^ IN THE H1GH COURT OF CHHA1TISGARH! BILASnjR WritPetttKmj(&\J No. 4647 of 2008 I'etitioncr Sfaaitesti UUariya @ Shailesli Verma, S/o Dhannu LiBarya, Aged about 35 yem-s, R/o ViUage . Nathi-tBawagaoa, Tahsil Dongat^aon, P.S. nojigBi^ioin, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. State of CIth^tisgarh,'Iltrough - Secretaiy, Departinent of Hoine Man.ttalaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raqiur (C.G.) District Magtetrate, Rajnandgaaia (C.G.) Supermtendent of Police, Rajaadgaon, CG. 2. 3. WRH' PETmON UNDER AKTICLE 226 OP THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon'ble Sbri Satish K. AgaihotriA) Shri Rajeev Shriyastava, Advocate wifh Shri Rajnish. Ba^hel, Advocate, for the petitioncr. Slui Vmiay Harit, Deputy Advocate Geneial for ttic icspondents, assisted by thc Officer lactiarge offhecaseSluiVijayPandey.C.S. P. RaJBandgaon. OR DER (Passed oia this 1" Day of September, 2008) 1. With the consentof teamedcouasel appeariagfor theparties, the matter is licard finaUy. 2. Shri Hant, teamed DeputyAdvoeate GeneBad, appeMing fbrtte respondents/State, oninstructioas, submits ttot fhe ^atutwy appeal, fited bj fhe petitioner is pendiag befmc the appellate authonty, wlucU may be considerad ia tbe nextweelc, 3. In tbc l^t of fh^e fot^oing suba^aion ntade by the State Counsel, nofhing siuvwes ia this xnatter. 4. As the dispute is already pending considteration befiwe thje appeflate aufhiority, the petltion M disposwl of with fla.c directfon that the appeal of tfae petitioncr shaU be conSMlered, - ^- as statcd above, in the next wcek i.e. oa 9.9.2008, in accordancc with law. In the eveat, no toearing takes plaee oh accouat of aay ttnavoidable reasoa, tfae appljcatioB ef the petitioiicr for interim lelicf" sUaU be considered, to ac<»rdaace with law and appxupriate orderai^r be passcd. Certified copy, as per Rutes. —^01" Tbdaa r ,[:,'r' \ '•';' \: »• -'A^; ^?^^^Ss.