SiNGlE s ^ }vq IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fSl N0. <^^1 QF2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS A"^...- ^y .^y.-/ff ^ ^ Dheeraj Kumar Gupta, son of Ravishankar Gupta, aged about 22 years; resident of village- Jarhadih, post office: Maharajgunj, Tehsil- Balrampur, District- Surguja (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through: The Secretary, Panchayat & Rural Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2) The Collector, Surguja, Ambikapur, District-Surguja (Chhattisgarh) 3) The Chief Executive Officer, Jila ^ Panchayat Ambikapur, District- Surguja (Chhattisgarh) 4) The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Kusmi, TehsiI-Samri, District-Surguja (Chhattisgarh) ^5) The Block Education Officer, Kusmi, District-Surguja (Chhattisgarh) 6) The Headmaster, Naveen Primary School, Bhadaar, Baskepi, Tehsil- Samri, District- Surguja (Chhattisgarh) ^ 7) Suresh Kumar Yadav, son of Shri Ravishankar Yadav, resident of village-Mankepi, TehsiI-Shankargarh, District- Surguja (Chhattisgarh) 8) Jiyaul Hasan, son of Sajjad Ahmed, resident of village-Shahpur, post ofRce: Kusmi, Tehsil-Samri, District- Surguja (Chhattisgarh) 9) Ambika Prasad, son of Shri Vishwanath, resident of village & ^ post office: Jamirapaat, Tehsil-Samri, District- Surguja (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA \^ ,HIGH COUST Or CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUB SB f HON%LB!SHm.,ffl^ICEJP^XIMKgaj5ffi£AKSB PBTITIONBR W.PJS) N0. 4881/2011 Dheeraj Kumar Gupta Versws RBSPONDBNTS State of C.G. 8s Others WRIT PBTmON UNDBR ARTICLE 226/227 OF THB CONSTITUTIOII CiF mDIA Appearaface: Shri V.K.Pandey^ counse! for the petitioner. i Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, Dy, A.G. for the State. ORALORDER (25.08.2011) Shri Pandey fairly submits that-there exist an altemative remedy for the petitioner to file revision under Rule 5 ofthe C.G. -Panchayat (Appeal & Revision) Rules 1995 and therefore he may be pemnitted to withdraw thiB . petition with the liberty to fiie revision. He however submits that direction. may be issued. to the revisional autho.rity to decide the reviaion of the petitioner expeditiously. State counsel has no bbjection if the petitioner wanta to withdraw this petitionwith Ubertyto avail the statutoryremedy, 'Accordingly, the petitioner is permitted towithdraw'this petition with' the liberty as aforesaid. Needless t6 state that in the eventuality of filing any suohrevis.ton by the petitioner the same would be decided by the competent aiithority as expeditiously as possible in accordarlce with law, Thus,.the petition is dismissed a.s withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed ajiy opimcn on the merits of the case .arid.fhe authority concemed would be at liberty to deoide the revision strictly m accordance with law* Counsel for the petitioner submits that the Registry be directed to retuin the certified oopy of Annexure P/.1 which has been filed along widi this petition. Registry is directed to retum the certified eopy provided he supplies the xerox copy of the sarae. r— ———- '^ Sd/- PritinkerDiwaker Judge