IN TH®HIGH GQURT OP CHHATTlSGiARHATBILASPUR W. P.(S)No. OF2011. i'igTlTlONER Nandu Ram Latiya, S/o. Shri Sonau Ram Latiya, ag&3 about 51 years, F'rinGipal, Govt. Higher School Lohandiguda, Block Lohandiguda, DiStriGtBastar (C.G.) VERSUS RES^ONDENTS ^ M/O^. -^3%/ 4^y ^J^ ^^ /^^l <^/-"^ '"y : 1.'' State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) 2. Coinmissiotier; Schedule Caste ^nd Schedule Tribe Development Departm.ent Pt. Ravisharikar Shukla Premises Raipur, Disft. Raipur, (C.G.) ^ 3. Treasury Officer, Treasury Accouftt an.d Pensibn, V/ \ BaAh'v' - '^B-wg, Distt.Dtt^, (C.G.) *^ ^^ WRrTP:E^TiONUNDE»Ain3eL£226t)I'*THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC—78 ^ST "iil4ld4, ^•rt!.Wt<S, ftdiyy W.P^5-)w,'3o^'S/^-(| T 0 31TOI TCTW (1 3iii?i^i<?;fe ^tnsfi^i^tte ^i^WtN WK%i< fe^ ^Rgn i? •afctf si^a SB : Hon'ble Shri ManindraMohan Shrivastava, J. m-06.2011 Shri Somkant Verma, oourjsel for the petitioner. Shri Y. S. Thakur, [Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondents on advance ocjpy. Heard. Learned counsel appeaifng for the petiti.oner submits that the petitioner is entitled to benefit ofjtwo advanoe increments on aocount of he having passed B. Ed. examinaticjn before appointment at his own oost. If is submitted that the issue involv^d in the present petition is no longer res integra and the same has beer{ finally decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Aslia Sa^ena vs. State of M.P. & Ors., 2009 01i) Ibmitted that this Court has also taken a similar view in his order dated P6-02-2009 passect in W.P. (8)No. 6257 of 2008. Learned counsel for th^ petitioner further draws attentlon of this Court to order dated 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeal No. 124 of 2009, wherein relying upon the judgr|ient of the Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) and the ij)rder passed by this Court in another Writ Appeal No.87/2009, direotions fiave been issued for oonsideration of the oftwo advance iilicrements as per cireular dated 21-09-1974 te Pradesh, after vetiflcation of the facts in pleaded petition. Leamed counsel for th^ respondents submits that now the State Government had issued a cirtular on 05-01-2011, which applies in the School Eduoation Department. ^-aa^ ^sSi^^l -^^/i ..,ff..i*y' XI-HC—78 ^sf -^nw^, 'ST&WW, fartl4iy< .\^.:£:(^).'y.:.'30^.s^^.l sn^"1^'?; (' 311^51 W K-ii* ^TT 5RT^?T: »>*lRt ^tfTO 'afel 311^1 — 2- Tumane In view ofthe statement mads of with a direction to the respondent) olaim of the petitioner for grant oft\| with law, after verification ofthe fact^ ofthree months from the date of recd ^ above, this petition is finally disposed lauthorities to oonsider and decide the fro advance increments in accordance pleaded in the petition within a period (ipt of a copy ofthis order. '^^feP'ft^ *)P'1W| tf fS1E3t'- <F3|^1:< 1;'afBtf SB^t Sd-/ . Manindra Mohan Shrivasfava Judge