WP(C) 302/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B. K. SHARMA Heard Mr. A.K. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms . A. Verma, learned Standing Counsel, Health. Mr. A.K. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if his representations relating to the grievance raised in t he writ petition are disposed of. The said representations are Annexure-5 dated 7.12.2010 and another one dated 8.12.2010 (Annexure-6), addressed to the Joint D irector of Health Services, Sonitpur, Tezpur, Assam. It appears that the said re presentations are public representations. If the petitioner is aggrieved by any action of the respondents in the matter of appointment as Chowkidar, he should h ave filed representation of his own and not through the public. It will be open for the petitioner to make representation to the Director of Health Services, As sam agitating his grievance. In the event of making such representation, the said Director shall disp ose of the same in accordance with law. It will be pertinent to mention here tha t as against the claim of the petitioner that he should have been appointed as C howkidar instead of respondent No.5, it is the stand of the respondents in their counter affidavit that in the selection, the respondent No.5 faired well and ac cordingly he has been appointed. With the above observation, the writ petition stands disposed of, withou t however, any order as to costs.