1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7567 OF 2008 IN REVIEW PETITION STAMP NO.12513 OF 2008 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.1367 OF 2005 Narayan s/o Vithoba Vyawhare Applicant Versus Kalu s/o Shankar Wani & others Respondents MrsS.D.Tambat-Dhumal, advocate for the applicant. Mr.C.G.Patil, advocate for Respondent No.2-a. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 08 th October, 2009. P.C.: This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 114 days occurred in presenting review application. Heard learned Counsel for respective parties. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 114 days occurred in presenting review application stands condoned. Civil Application stands disposed of. (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE ******* adb/rast1251308 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW PETITION STAMP NO.12513 OF 2008 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.1367 OF 2005 Narayan s/o Vithoba Vyawhare Applicant Versus Kalu s/o Shankar Wani & others Respondents MrsS.D.Tambat-Dhumal, advocate for the applicant. Mr.C.G.Patil, advocate for Respondent No.2-a. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 08 th October, 2009. P.C.: Heard learned Counsel for respective parties. There is absolutely no ground for reviewing the order passed by this Court. Review Application is devoid of substance. Hence, stands rejected. (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE ******* adb/rast1251308