1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3023/2005 Devi Singh and others. Vs. State of Raj. and others. Date : 5.7.2005 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. Sudhir Sharma, for the petitioners. Mr. Vijay Bishnoi, for the respondents. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were not given copy of the order dated 5.5.2005 (Annexure-R.2/13) by which the decision was taken by the Gram Panchayat to evict the petitioners from the land in dispute. It is also submitted that the petitioners were not knowing this order but since the respondents have placed on record copy of order dated 5.5.2005, the petitioners may be permitted to prefer the appeal to challenge the order dated 5.5.2005. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioners preferred the writ petition before this Court and this Court was pleased to pass the interim order in favour of the petitioners on 20.5.2005 and thereafter, the copy of this order has been supplied to the petitioners on 24.5.2005. 2 Be it as it may. Since the order under challenge is appealable, according to petitioners themselves and they want to prefer appeal, therefore, this writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to challenge the order dated 5.5.2005 (Annex.R-2/13) in appeal. If there is any delay, the petitioners may submit application for condonation of delay which may be considered sympathetically by the appellate authority. The appeal may be filed within a period of ten days from today and till then, both the parties shall maintain status quo with respect to the land in dispute. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya