@ p. Smgha Rgnm @ 1N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRITPETITION N0. ‘7 $3 macs PETITIONER :/ Anil Kumar Tiwari, S/o Shri Gaya Prasad Tiwari, Aged about 50 years , Presently working as Assistant Fisheries- Officer ai the Department of Fisheries; Rajnandgaen , CG. R/e HNO. 236/19, Gayawi Colony, Kamla Cellege Reéd‘ e s \ \ ¥ Rajnandgaon , CG. VERSUS :/ 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Fishexies, Mantraiaya, DKS. Bhawan , Raipur (CG) i’" 2. The Diwctor, Depaftment of Fishefie‘s, RESPQNDENTS Telibandha , Ravigram, Raipur (C.G.)‘ O WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 2'f6/227 OF THE CONSTiTUTiON OF 1NDIA FOR 1SSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE ()F MANEAMUS; ?R(}HiBiTiON z RTIORARI AND ANY OTHER WRITS D ' ECTIONS 0 ’ ORDERS; XI-HC-78 WW,W,W WWW w/;vr..V\..., uha—“t v 'WW§WW %37%n3n%¥r r 14.3.2005 Shri Satyendra Sahu, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri AkhilAgrawal, Panal Lawyer for the State on advance copy. Application (I.A.No. l 565’2005) for urgent hearing is allowed. Heard on admission. . The contention of the leamed counsel for the petitioner is‘that the gradation list prepared by the, department does not containsthe name of the petitioner. Vide rel Lef clauSe 7.2 of the petition. learned counsel has claimed that the name of the petitioner should be placed before serial no.20 in the gadation list (Amexure'P-l). beamed counsel further submits that ifthe petitioner is placed at Serial No. 19 or prior to Serial No.20, he Will‘be considered for further promotions. Learned counsel for the being, this petition may be disp t0 file a detailed representation the competent authority should within the stipulated period grant The prayer seems to be i in allowing such prayer at this st Prayer is allowed. directed. may file a detailed representation along-With a copy of this order and the copy of this petition before the competent/authority within a period of 15 days ' The petitioner, if so petitioner submits that for the time used of with liberty to the petitioner ’before the competent authority and be directed to dispose of the same .ed by this Court. ‘easonable. There is no impediment 1ge without hearing the other side. amenW wgeiwataeelr§a mmmtawu ; ‘ s: 1 o XI—HC—78 'WWWW / ..o..oooooo¢ooo. K/h? W 200 mW<W> ’ WWW wmm WWW “ ‘1’ WW§WW %31%n311%$1 , from today and if such a r authority shall decide the sam possible preferably within 8 v remesentation. It is made clear opinion on the merits ofthe case. With the above obsel disposed of at this stage. C.C. as per rules. :presentation is flled the competent a in accorllance with law, as early as reeks o‘om the date of filing of such that this Court has not expressed any vations, this petition standsifinally Sgt/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge "