THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.15215 of 2006 Dated: 24.08.2006 Between 1.Masina Sriramulu and others. …..Petitioners and 1.The Govt. of AP rep., by its Principal Secretary and others. ….Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.15215 of 2006 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a Mandamus to direct the respondents to take action with reference to Memo No.2725/A6/2000 dated 6.1.2006, Endorsement No.2725/A6/2003 dated 12.06.2006 and Rc.No.2725/A6/20003 dated 7.10.2004 and 8.12.2004 of the Deputy Director of Fisheries Department, East Godavari District, the Memo in Roc.No.606/2006/A4 dated 3.3.2006 of the District Panchayat Officer, East Godavari District, the Report in Rc.No.10/2001 dated 4.9.2003 of the Fisheries Development Officer cum G.Medapadu Fishermen Cooperative Society Enquiry Officer submitted to the Assistant Director of Fisheries, Kakanida Division, East Godavari District by returning the amounts due to the petitioners with 18% per annum as mentioned in the Report dated 4.9.2003. The grievance of the petitioners seems to be that on a representation submitted by them to the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Department, and Panchayatraj Department complaining about the misutilization of funds of the society, the Departments were activated and were directed to furnish specific remarks for taking action. The Deputy Director of Fisheries, Fisheries Department and Ex-Officio Joint Registrar, Fishermen Cooperative Societies, Jagannadhapuram, Kakinada, East Godavari District issued a show cause notice dated 4.3.2005 under Section 34 of A.P. Co-operative Societies Act 7 of 1964 and called upon the Managing Committee to submit explanation against the allegations leveled against them including the one regarding misappropriation of society funds etc. According to the petitioners, at various levels action was proposed to be taken and a report was submitted. But, nothing happened thereafter. In view of the above, the respondents are directed to treat the very writ petition as a representation. The concerned respondents shall take appropriate action as per law and communicate the petitioners as to the status of action taken on the reports submitted by them against the management of the society. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. __________ 24.08.2006 rkk