1 mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.1129 of 2010 Krishnat Vitthal Mane ... Petitioner versus Mangal Krishnat Mane ... Respondent ... Mr. M.M. Patil for the petitioner. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATED : 07th June 2010 P.C. 1. Heard. 2. I am not inclined to interfere in the impugned order firstly because it is interlocutory. Even otherwise I am not inclined to interfere in the order for the reasons indicated below. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the trial court committed a jurisdictional error in granting an injunction restraining the petitioner husband from interfering with the possession of the respondent wife in the suit premises. Whether the suit premises was a matrimonial property or was a separate property of the respondent wife could be decided by the trial court especially at the interlocutory 2 stage for grant of an injunction. In my view, there is no jurisdictional error committed by the trial court. 4. No other point was urged. Writ Petition is dismissed summarily. (D.G. KARNIK,J.)