W.P. No. 1271 (MB) of 2001 Old No. 48550 of 2000 Hon. A. A. Desai, C.J. Hon. Irshad Hussain, J. Sri O.P.Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned C.S.C. appeared. The petitioner has applied for manual rickshaw. In 2000, his application was rejected on the ground that the number of rickshaws is more than sufficient. Sri O.P.Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, has argued that by now after the expiry of two years, the traffic has increased and, therefore, his claim for licence has a justification. Heard learned counsel for the parties. It is revealed that the petitioner is not a rickshaw puller. She has applied on somebody’s behalf. Such claim for permission is untenable. However, the authorities shall consider the application of individual rickshaw puller, if they apply afresh, according to requirement and need or the time. With the above direction, the petition is disposed of. (A. A. Desai, C. J.) (Irshad Hussain, J.) Dt. 02.09.2002 A