HIQH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITLONiRS RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION N0. 3297 OF 2005 1 Vinod Kumar Jogl, aged about 33 years, S/o Shri JaJiaS Jogi, "!TI Dongargarh" R/o Qtr. No.t-B, Street No.5, Sector-S, Bhiiai, Distrlct Durg (CG). 2 Ku. Vaishaii Gajbhiye, aged about 26 years, D/o Shri Bhuneshwar Gajbhiye, "STI Durg", R/o Zon-1, Near Panchshii School, PanchshiS Nagar, Bhltei, Sector -11, Dlst. Durg (CG). 3 Vldya Bhushan Patsi, aged about 23 years, S/o Shri Chandra Bhawan Patei, •1TJ Durg", R/o 544/3, Ashish Nagar, Face-2 (Esst), Street No.5, Reeshall, Bhilai, District Durg (CG). 4 Bhupesh Kumar Kaushik, aged about 29 ysars, S/o S.R. Kaushlk, "1T! Durg", R/o Qtr. No.G-1, ITI Colony, Chhawani, Bhiiai, District Durg (CG). 5 Hemant Kaushlk, aged about 30 years, S/o S.R. Kaushlk, "JTI Parpodi", R/o Qtr.No.G-1, !Tj Colony, Chhawani, Bhiial, Distrlct Durg (CG). S Sanat Kumar, aged about 32 years, S/o KanhalSal, "IT! Ber!a", R/Q viJlage Post Dhour (Jamui), Tahsil & Distrid Durg (CG). 7 Kamai Kisahore Jangade, aged about 25 years, S/o Shri Tularam Jangde, "ITJ Bemetara", R/o Post Nagarda, VSa Biiaigarh, District Raipur (CG). Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secrstary, Hlgher & TechnscaJ Education Department, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. The Secretary, IVIan Power & Piannjng, Mantraiaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 3. Director, Empioymsnt & Training, Mahila Polytechnjc Campus, Bairan Bazar, Rajpur, Tahsil & District Raipur (CG). 4. Joint DIrector (Tralning), Industrial TraininQ Instltutes, New Shanti Nagar, Gaii No.4, Raipur (CG). (Writ petition under Artlcle 226/227 of the Constitution of India) ^'-1-''' ^*^^ Slngie Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satlsh K. Agnihotri, J. Present :• Vr. Roop Naik, counsei for the petitioners. Nr. Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Advocate General forthe State. gRAL_ORDER (Passed on this 7 day of JVIay, 2009) Learned counsei for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to v^thdraw this petition In the light of dedslon of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Secretary, State of Karnataka anci others Vs. Umadevi (3) and others1, with llberty to take reeourse to appropriate remedy. 2. It is ordered, as prayed for. 3. Accordlngiy, the petition is ciismjssed as wlthdrawn with the aforesaid iiberty. — — Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ' (2006) 4 SCC 1