IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33732 of 2009 KUSHAL RISHIDEO @ KAUSHAL RISHIDEO, SON OF PARSADI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SONAPUR BAZAR, P.S. NARPATGANJ, DISTRICT-ARARIA……………………………………………PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………………………………..OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. R.P.S. Singh, A.P.P. -------- 2. 9.10.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 304(B)/328/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner, who is the husband of the deceased, has falsely been implicated in this case. In fact, the deceased had died due to complications during pregnancy. It is further submitted that the father and mother of the petitioner have already been granted bail by this Court. Learned A.P.P. for the State submitted that for the said occurrence a complaint case was filed which was forwarded to the concerned police station for investigation and it has come during the course of investigation that the deceased was poisoned to death by the accused persons for the non-fulfillment of illegal demand of dowry. It has also come that this petitioner had committed the occurrence due to the disclosure of the fact that there is illicit relation between him and his bhabhi. - 2 - Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner for the present. As a result, this application is dismissed at this stage. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)