1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2268 OF 2011 (Rahima Bi wd/o Sayyed Isaque vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. AUGUST 11, 2011. Heard Shri Kulkarni, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Kankale, learned AGP for respondent No. 1. Shri Kulkarni, learned counsel has supplied second set of the petition. We find that the challenge is to the notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Scheme of the Land Acquisition Act is complete in itself and if the respondents do not comply with the procedure within stipulated time, consequences to the benefit of the petitioner ensue. Hence, without observing anything on the merits of the controversy, we dispose of the petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach again, if cause of action arises. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.