IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22738 of 2010 SHAMBHU NATH JHA, SON OF SRI YUGAL JHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 13.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 465, 467, 471, 472, 474 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that by an order dated 21.4.2009 the petitioner was granted privilege of anticipatory bail vide Cr. Misc. 45826 of 2008 but, unfortunately, when one of the co-accused persons came before this Court, submission was made that the petitioner is still continuing with his old tricks on account of which his anticipatory bail was cancelled by an order dated 31.3.2010. The submission is that the petitioner is in custody since 25.5.2010 and the entire case is based on documents and in fact in the next School where the petitioner was reportedly working on the basis of the same certificate, no case had been instituted against the petitioner. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in Garhpura P.S. Case No. 49 of 2008 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner 2 who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)