•h- t •-HC—78 T^ r*ll<llcl<), 8>TTlwle, fsl<ilW3,< MI^I*Ni*-^-^^-"^^-&""--Wt2000) an^T'qgq? (yf^vi) afl^T W R-li* wii an^i siiiiii <' tSMIW ^ffSW 311^1 PhllltUNhK RESPONDENTS -Versu^ 1. 2. 3. Sinale Bench: Hon'bte 28-1-2009:- Dr. Sanjeet Sharma, counsel fo Shri M.P.S. BhaBa, Deputy No.1,2and4. Heard. The grievance of the petitions Annexure-P/6 dated 17-11-2008 he jo his transferred place at Kanker. order of Annexure-P/8 dated 17-12-2( Superintendent Land Records at his liWft'fll'l iwwff <i^6 tl<n<(i< ^aiRnsw^ snankar PaUe7 S/o Late Shri Ariuj Ram Patle, aged about 54 years, Occupation Service, At present posted as Superintendent Land Record, Kanker, District Kanker (CG) The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Buitding, Raipur (CG) Collector, Jagdatpur, Dlstrict Bastar Election Commission of India, through the Secretary, ElecUon Commission, New'Dethi Additional Coliector, North Bastar, Kanker, District Kanker (CG) Bhri Dhirendra Mishra. J. G<tvt the petitioner. t. Advocate for the StaWrespondents jr is that in compliance of the order of [ned as Superintendent Land Records at Ho<)i/ever, the petitloner was informed vide -2IJ108 that since there is no vacant post of ti^nsferred place, it would not be possibls fahtftf—HftK**?W 2.'A'"^a.^*<£?t-a^K.^.. ^p^/ 3 XI-HC—78 311^1 ^TR-li'* 'irai <*n^i ^•flNt /<? Bar/e T ~S53f '^WM^, ®TaT^<ls,ftwi'My «ii*i<ni a»*ii<»i •Vt200 sn^r'q'w (1pi35Rp) ^iiwateTsn^i ^ *i'i(f<'i<il-i timCTf 4 fe^ "(ftre^R ^sifOTan^i lu (Jiaw balaiy and omer attowanipes orme petitioner in compliance of (he directions issued bythis Court on 1f-1-2009. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, tearned |Deputy ©ovt.Advocate appearing for the Stete submitted that the Governm Records to draw salary of the petiti^ the..Districtvide order dated 21-1-2fl ent has now directed the Collector Land iner against the vacant post of Tehsildar jn 09. Learned counsel for the peti(ioner submitted that the petitioner has not been given charge of SLR, as therejls no vacant post of SLR In the District. Leamed counsel for the S(ate submitted that if the petitioner files representation for redressal of his g Secretary, Revenue, the same sl rievances raised in this petition betore the lall be considered and decided by the concerned authority within a perio^l of 3 weel®from the date of receipt of representation. In view of the submission mi representation before the Secretary de by teamed counset for the parties, the instant petition is disposed of wijh liberty to the petttioner to file fresh Revenue within a period ef 10 days from today. On such representation bein^) made by the petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided by the con^erned authority within a further period of 3 weeks from the date ofreceipt of repjresentation. A;. ;— Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge g