1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NO.1446 OF 2007 IN CHANDIGARDH CIVIL SUIT NO.154 OF 2004 Jaicksin Wadhumal Balani and Ors. .. Plaintiffs Versus Vasant Rai Pandit & Anr. .. Defendants Mr.Jatin Sanghvi i/b. M/s.Dholakia Law Associates for plaintiffs CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 31st March 2008 P.C. . Notice under Order 21 Rule 22 has been despatched by R.P.A.D. on defendant Nos. 1 and 2 in separate packets. The packets have been received undelivered and the postal remark is "left not known". Thereafter the order of 7th December 2007 for substituted service has been 2 complied with by publishing notice in Free Press Journal and Navshakti, which are daily newspapers published in English and Marathi respectively. 2. Similarly, notice has been pasted/affixed at conspicuous place in Court premises. In such circumstances, there is a presumption that the notice has been duly served. None appears for the judgement debtors. The notice is not opposed. In such circumstances, the same is made absolute. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)