IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1364 OF 2007. APPLICATION NO.1364 OF 2007. APPLICATION NO.1364 OF 2007. IN IN IN SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.1407 OF 2005. APPEAL NO.1407 OF 2005. APPEAL NO.1407 OF 2005. Smt Sundrabai Dattatraya Kamble ...Applicant. Versus. Shri Deoram Phulaji More ...Respondent. Shri G.R.Agarwal for the Applicant. Shri S.H.Joshi for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 14th MARCH, 2008. : 14th MARCH, 2008. : 14th MARCH, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard advocates appearing for the parties. My attention has been invited to judgment and decree passed in Regular Civil Suit No.121 of 2000 filed by the respondent against the applicant’s husband. The said suit related to the suit structure which is the subject matter of the dispute in present Second Appeal. By the decree passed in the said suit there is an injunction granted against the husband of the applicant restraining him from carrying out permanent construction or alteration to the suit structure. Even in the impugned judgment and decree of the Appellate Court which is the subject matter of the present Second Appeal there is a finding recorded that applicant’s husband was a tenant of the suit structure. Therefore, granting the relief which is prayed for in this application will have effect of nullifying the decree passed in Regular Civil Suit No.121 of 2000 against the applicant’s husband which as of today has attained finality. Hence, prayer made in this application cannot be granted as of today and the same is rejected. Judge. Judge. Judge.