IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARILAL THURSDAY, THE 17TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 26TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 30215 of 2011(B) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- M/S. NEESA LEISURE LTD., "CAMBAY SQUARE", PLOT NO.X-22, 23 & 24, GIDC ELECTRONIC ESTATE, SECTOR-25, GANDHINAGAR, GUJARATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER HAREESH S. BY ADV. SRI.R.ANIL RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF KERALA, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM(RURAL), KOTTARAKKARA - 691 506. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,KUNDARA, KOLLAM- 691 001. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUNDARA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM - 691 001. 5. DIPUCHANDRA MOHAN, AGED 36, S/O.GOPALA PILLAI CHANDRA MOHAN, NEELESWARAM P.O., NEDUVATHOOR, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691 506. 6. ANISH KUMAR, AGED 37, S/O. APPUKUTTAN NAIR, THEKKATHU VEEDU, MURUKKUMON,NILAMEL P.O.-691 535, KERALA. 7. JINESH KUMAR U., AGED 26, S/O. UNNI PILLAI, JINU BHAVAN, VELLIMON WEST, KOLLAM. 8. DINESH CHANDRAN, AGED 39, S/O.CHANDRAN PILLAI, SREEVILASAM, PADINJATTINKARA,KOTTARAKKARA-691 506. R1 TO R4 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. C.R.SHYAMKUMAR R5 TO R8 BY ADV. SRI.K.V.ANILKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 30215/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT TO THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUNDARA POLICE STATION DATED 04/11/2011. P2: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT AND REQUEST FOR POLICE PROTECTION MADE TO THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM DATED 07/11/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & K.HARILAL,JJ ------------------------------------------------- W.P(C) No.30215 of 2011 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T Pius C. Kuriakose, J The learned counsel for the party respondents sought for a weeks time to file a counter affidavit. Sri.Shyam Kumar, learned Senior Government Pleader submitted that subsequently there are conciliation conference was conveyed by the Sub Inspector of Police and in the said conference all the issues between the parties was amicably settled. At the moment there is no law and order situation. Sri.R. Anil Kumar the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner's resort will not able to function unless the interim order issued by this Court on 14.11.2011 is confirmed. We enquired of the learned counsel for the party respondents as to whether the party respondents intend to cause any obstructions in the matter of conducting a resort by the petitioner. The learned counsel answered in the negative. In the above circumstances we dispose of this writ petition confirming the interim order issued by this Court on 14.11.2011. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE K.HARILAL ab JUDGE