IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.661 of 2009 (S/S) Gajendra Kumar Bhogal …..Petitioner Versus Union of India & others ….Respondents Mr I.P. Kohli, Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs Anjali Bhargava, Standing Counsel for Union of India. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. By means of this petition, the petitioner has challenged the transfer order dated 19.05.2009 and also the order dated 02.06.2009 by which his representation was rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted before the Court that in his representation the petitioner has specifically mentioned that his father is 74 years old and is disabled and he has to look after his father. It was also mentioned in the representation that wife of the petitioner is working in the office of District Magistrate, Dehradun and in view of the guidelines the petitioner is entitled for his posting at Dehradun or at nearby place. According to learned counsel for the petitioner the respondents while rejecting his representation has not considered the submission of the petitioner made in his representation and as such rejection order is bad. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that in rejection order dated 02.06.2009 respondent no.3 has also mentioned that no representation will be considered in future also. In view of the Court such observation is not correct as no person can be prevented for making his representation in future. During the course of the argument learned counsel for the petitioner confined his prayer that he may be permitted to move fresh representation before respondent no.3 and his representation may be decided within reasonable time. Mrs. Anjali Bhargava, Standing Counsel does not have any objection if aforesaid order is passed. In view of the above, the petitioner is permitted to move fresh representation before respondent no.3 within one week from today. In case representation is moved within one week, the respondent no.3 shall decide the same expeditiously by reasoned order. With this direction the writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not stayed the transfer order. Let the certified copy of this order be given to learned counsel for the parties today on payment of usual charges. (V.K.Bist. J,) 01.07.2009 Arti