IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 1678 of 2010 Date of Decision: 27.10.2010 Seth Pal and another .... Petitioners Versus Ram Chander and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioners ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Plaintiff has invoked supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 22.1.2010 passed by Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.) Karnal thereby rejecting the application moved by the plaintiff-petitioners seeking amendment in the plaint and seeking permission to implead LRs of Raja Ram and their vendees as defendants. Learned trial Court has rejected the application having observed that plaintiff was very well aware about the facts and circumstances of the proceedings before the commencement of the trial and plaintiff could not prove as to why all the facts were not brought on record despite of due diligence. I do not find any illegality or perversity in the impugned order. Dismissed. (ALOK SINGH) 27.10.2010 JUDGE reena