?etitionar \Nrii ?ef§€§on igg No. 7551 9f ”2%aT AP. pate}! S/o. Late Rishikes'n Patel: aged about 5? wars, Depuhl Director of Agricu!ture, Rig vmagle Birkd, Pos€ Nawagarh, Distt. Mahasamuno‘ (CG); ai assent resident 9f Kabir Chem/k, Raigam, Tahsi! and District Raigarh {39). Verws ’i) The State of Chhattisgam thrcugh ihe Seme‘tary, Department of Agricultura DKS. Bhawanx RaipumCG)‘ ”w I; Vm. Resgondems Weseni: With cansem of ieamed counsei appearing for both the games, i‘ne matter is heard finaHy‘ 2) Learned counsei appear‘ing for the respondentsi$tate submits that the impugned order 5-t’r-2007 (Annexure Pit) may be quashed and the respondents/State be granted tiber‘ry to pass fresh order, iooking into the administrative extgehcy and tn the public interest. 3) Learned oounset appearing for the petitioner auomits that eno‘s or“ justice wouid be subserved, it the respondentsf’a‘tate pass fresh order, in administrative exigenoy and in the pubiic interest. 2) D‘reotor, Agricuiture, Ra§pur$ Tahsil and Gistrio“: Raipur (CG). Joint mrector, Agiicultere, Ragam D§strict Raigam (CG). Jami Direcior, Agr§cuiture, Bnaspur] Distric‘i Bi!aepur (CG). 5) shri Lam Mohan Bhagat, Prmcipax Former TrainingCentre Ambikapur. Sayguja, District garguga (CG). (Writ Petitéon under Articie 228 of the Constitution of tndia) s3: Hon’bie Mr. eaiish K. ’Agathatri. a. Shri Gautam Khetrapai, counseiforthe petitioner. Smt. Sunita Jain. Pane! Lawyer for the State. @Rm. $R§ER gassed on 2‘” may of May. gees; MM 1ew of the foregoing, the impugmd om‘er ciateo‘ 5-11 4) in v £007 (Annexure P11) is quashed am the respondemtsistate is at iibetiy t0 pass fmsh order a 5) s siaied above. Accordingiy’ the petition is disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge iju .. .....