IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 94 of 1986 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.P.DHOLAKIA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO @ RASILABEN BHUPATRAI JHALA Versus GORDHANDAS JEVANT GOKANI,THRO:POWER OF ATT. LJ GOKANI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Civil Revision Application No. 94 of 1986 MR JR NANAVATI for Petitioner No. 1-2 RULE UNSERVED for Respondent No. 1 NOTICE NOT RECD BACK for Respondent No. 1-2 RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.P.DHOLAKIA Date of decision: 13/08/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT The learned counsel for the petitioners, producing the letter received from his client, has made a statement at the bar that the matter has been settled between the parties and hence, they do not like to proceed further with the matter. Letter is ordered to be taken on record. 2. In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Civil Revision Application stands disposed of. Rule is discharged. Interim relief stands vacated. (R.P.DHOLAKIA,J.) radhan/