1 wp 9699.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9699 OF 2011 Ranjana Pandurang Shingare .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri M. P. Tripathi, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri N. H. Borade, A. G. P. for the Respondent/State. Shri Sangle, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 19TH DECEMBER, 2011. PER COURT : . The petitioner impugns the order dated 23 rd November, 2011 refusing the stay to the present petitioner in an appeal filed against the order of Chief Executive Officer. Shri Tripathi, the learned counsel strenuously submits that no reasons are given for not granting of stay by the Commissioner which shows that the Commissioner has not applied mind while rejecting the application for stay. 2 wp 9699.11 2. Shri Sangle, the learned counsel for respondent Nos. 3 and 4 submits that the appeal itself can be disposed of on merits. The learned Assistant Government Pleader also supports the order. 3. Taking into account the appeal is fixed for hearing and fact that there is no order of stay since 20 th October, 2011, I do not feel it appropriate to intervene at this stage. The Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad shall dispose of the appeal expeditiously and preferably within a period of two months from today. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. 4. Needless to state that, I have not opined on the merits of the matter. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/Dec. 11