Cr.Misc. M 21014 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 21014 of 2011 Date of decision: 11.8.2011 Ravi petitioner vs State of Haryana respondent Present:- Mr.Rakesh Nehra, Advocate. Ms. Sushma Chopra, Addl.A.G.Hry Mr. RN Lohan, Advocate. M.M.S.BEDI, J. The petitioner as a member of an unlawful assembly is alleged to have assaulted Rakesh, Krishan and others with rods and lathies pursuant to a dispute, which has arisen on account of calf of accused having entered the fields of the complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the petitioner has not been attributed any grievous injury. He has been attributed an injury on the right hand of complainant Rakesh. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the police file. Though the injury on the person of Manjit PW on his right hand has not been explained by the informant Rakesh but Manjit has suffered a fracture of right hand. The said injury is attributed to the petitioner with an iron rod. The petitioner has inflicted an injury with an iron rod on the person of Rakesh as well as on the person of Rinku. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the petitioner is a young boy of 19 years and has been falsely implicated in the Cr.Misc. M 21014 of 2011 2 case. The allegations in the FIR are absolutely vague. There is no specific injury attributed to any of the accused persons. The injuries, if any, could be in self defence. I have considered the contentions of counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner and others, no doubt, are not specifically attributed any injury in the FIR but the statement of the injured, recorded during investigation, specified the injuries attributed to each of the accused. The MLR of the injured existing on the file, at this stage, seem to corroborate with the injuries described by the injured witnesses in their statements u/s 161 Cr.P.C. The plea of self defence raised by the petitioner may constitute a good ground for grant of re0gular bail to the petitioner but no extra ordinary exceptional circumstances exist for the grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner on account of he having been attributed grievous injuries on the person of Manjit and Rinku and simple injury on the person of Rakesh. Dismissed. August 11 , 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE