IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4314 of 2010 1. CHUNNA ALAM @ CHUNNU. 2. Tuna Alam @ Tunna. Both are sons of Hadish Mian. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04. 08.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 363 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation in the First Information Report is that the Marshal Jeep with driver had disappeared and it was suspected that the driver had been kidnapped along with the vehicle. During investigation the petitioners were implicated on suspicion and they gave a disclosure statement on which the mobile phone of the deceased was found in a box. In view of such and also that the petitioners have criminal antecedents, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to consider as to whether a case under Section 364 IPC is made out in the facts of the case. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)