IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.CHELAMESWAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 4TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 13TH KARTHIKA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 1276 of 2010(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.32954/2005 Dated 05/12/2005 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER: ---------------------------- GOPALAKRISHNAN, NAMBRAMPURATH KOZHIPURATH, S/O.VASU, P.O.CHELLANNUR, THAMARASSERY, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SMT.T.RESMI DAMODARAN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 5 & 6: ------------------------------------------ 1. ASHARAF, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, NADAKAVU POLICE STATION, NADAKKAVU, KOZHIKODE-673 011. 2. SAJEEV, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, ELATHUR POLICE STATION, ELATHUR, KOZHIKODE-673 303. BY SENIOR GOVT. PLEADER, SMT. K. MEERA. THIS CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J.Chelameswar, C.J. & P.R.Ramachandra Menon, J. ------------------------------------------ Cont. Case (C) No.1276 of 2010 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 4th day of November, 2010 JUDGMENT Ramachandra Menon, J. This Contempt Case has been preferred by the petitioner alleging contumacious act on the part of the respondents in so far as they are not taking any effective steps to grant police protection as ordered by this Court as per the judgment dated 5.12.2005 in W.P. (C) No.32954 of 2005. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by virtue of the settled rights and liberties of the petitioner pursuant to the verdict passed by the competent civil court, it ought not to have been neglected or disrespected from the part of the respondents in providing the protection as ordered by this Court. 3. The learned Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents submits with reference to the contents of the statement filed that the respondents have offered adequate and Cont. Case (C) No.1276 of 2010 - 2 - effective protection as and when any attempt to thwart the orders passed by the civil court was brought to notice, as ordered to be ensured throughout and that it will never be left to be flouted in any manner. The statement as above is recorded. We find that no further orders are called for in this matter. The contempt case is accordingly closed. J.Chelameswar, Chief Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon, Judge vns