1 CR.APL NO.1482/2011 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 915. APPLN/1482/2011 ASHOK BHANUDAS DIGHOLE [Criminal] V/S THE STATE OF MAH THR. PARALI CITY P.S. -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. R.N.Dhorde, Adv., h/f Mr. V.R.Dhorde, Adv., for the applicant. Mr.K.S.Patil, APP for State. Mr. A.M.Gaikwad, Adv., for assisting A.P.P. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:3/5/2011 1. Heard Mr. A.M.Gaikwad, appears for the complainant Sunil, seeks to assist A.P.P. Permitted. Application allowed. 2. Heard. The accused who is in custody seeks bail on protraction of the Sessions trial, for not adhering time schedule by the State or by the learned Additional Sessions Judge. The order dt.30th June, 2010, speaks of time schedule to dispose of the case upto 10th Sept.,2010. Thereafter, by order dt.27th Sept.,2010, as and by way of last chance, it was extended by six months which, by calculation, expired in March, 2011. I am informed, and not controverted, 2 CR.APL NO.1482/2011 the learned Sessions Judge again sought extension, explaining the reasons and the extension is granted for six months. Certain developments in the matter illustrate that the learned Judge then presiding over heard the submissions/arguments, however, could not continue with the matter. The next incumbent also could not proceed. It was in the above situation and inspite of submissions of learned Public Prosecutor being completed before earlier Judge, fresh submission is required to be advanced for which the matter is informed to be placed either on 9th May, 2011 or on 11th May, 2011. In the above situation, the laxity to which Mr. Dhorde has given reference would not germane to entertain the application to release the applicant on bail. Application dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/1482-11crapl