IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1422 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 1422 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 1422 OF 2005 Purshottam V. Raheja. ... Petitioner Versus. State of Maharashtra & others. ... Respondents. Shri D.D.Madan i/by M/s.Bachubhai Munim & Co. for the Petitioner. Shri Niranjan Pandit, A.G.P.for respondents 1 & 2. Shri Samir Bhalekar for respondent 3. Ms.Betty D’Souza, i/by Shri M.P.Vashi for respondent 4. CORAM CORAM CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI & : SMT.RANJANA DESAI & : SMT.RANJANA DESAI & ABHAY ABHAY ABHAY S. OKA, JJ. S. OKA, JJ. S. OKA, JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 29th November, 2005. : 29th November, 2005. : 29th November, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The learned counsel for respondents 2 and 3, on the instructions of Shri Hemant Mokashi, Assistant Legal Manager of respondent 2, states that the matter is likely to be settled between respondent 3 and respondents 4 to 6. He states that respondent 3 has not attached the property involved in this petition and they do not intend to do so in pursuance of the notices impugned in this petition. He states that respondents 2 and 3 may issue fresh notice if necessary. 2. In view of this, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition. Petition disposed of as withdrawn. (Smt.Ranjana Desai, J.) (Abhay S.Oka, J.)