IM& HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLESHRtRAJEEVGUPTA.C.J. HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. WRTT PETITION (PIU N0.6676 of 2009 Petitioner Respondents Sanjay Nayak, S/o Shri Rajendra Nayak, aged 26 years, R/o House No.2, SBI Golony, in front of Doffin Int. School, Sundar Nagar, Mahadevghaat Road, Raipur, Distrlct Raipur (C.G.) Versus Union of India, through, The Director, (Transport-Research), Ministry of Surface Transport, New Delhl State of Chhattisgarh, through the Home Secretary, Department of General Administratlon/Public Grievances, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur The State of Chhattisgarti, Through, Commissioner of State Transport, Pandri, Raipur (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA Present : Shri Devershi Thakur, Counsei for the petitioner. Shri R. Pradhan, Standing Counsel for the Union of India/respondent No.1. Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Additional Advocate General for the State/respondents No.2 & 3. ORDER (16th of November, 2009) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Learned counset for the parties are heard. 2 'V;!^ 2. Petltioner Sanjay Nayak, claiming himself to be an Advocate, has flted this writ petition styled as 'Public tnterest Litigation' for the following relief (s): "10.1 A writ and/or an order in the nature of writ of mandamus do issue commanding and directing the res[X)ndents to produce before this Hon'ble Court all the relevant records, files, sanctlon orders, certiflcat^ etc. relevant for the disposal ofthe case. 10.2 A writ and/or an order in the nature of writ of mandamus do issue directing the respondents authorities to compel the respondent State authorities to comply with the provisions of the Acts legislations described herein above and further direct the authorities to take action for prosecution of all the persons concerned and officers in-charge etc. of the respondents respectively as per law. 10.3 A writ and/or an order in the nature of writ of mandamus do issue to the State authoritles to compute the compensation to all those who have been deprived of their identities in records or being issued the doubling of their License numbere to be issue fresh ones and authenticate them as genuine, for the start, the records available in this petition, licenses issued admlttedly twice on the same number by the officer himself be corrected and either of the two be re-issued a new numbered licenses without any cost to those who are being issued the new ones. 10.4 A writ and/or an order in the nature of writ of mandamus do issue to the respondents to arrange the records in a computerized format linked with the Central lincensing Authority, as In the other states, which would enable to check one's identity on a mouse ctick. ^c. 10.5 A writ and/or an order In the nature of writ of mandamus do issue to the respondents to enqulre by a competent authority or agencies, the conduct of the officers in charge using their Chair's power for their personal benefrts, or irregularities unexplained, prosecuting them for punishmente as perlaw prescribed accordingly. 10.6 A writ and/or an order in the nature of appropriate writ do issue restraining the respondents from further practicing as they are, i.e. the "Devil may Care" attitude of the authorities may be stopped and the procedures as in the Acts and Rules respectively should be followed strictly through proper channels and appropriate direction in this regard may also be issued to the respondent State authorities. 10.7 A writ and/or an order in the nature of appropriate writ do issue to the respondents to make provisions as to no officer should be handling a work for long conforming him to maniputate. 10.8 A writ and/or an order in the nature of appropriate writ do issue to the respondents to conclude the case before the CBI Court, or the writ petitton pending before this Hon'ble High Court respectively. 10.9 A writ and/or an order in the nature of appropriate writ do issue to the respondents that the Registration Authorities Officer shoutd not be In key positions so as they can again be facilltated to do the same as they are charge-sheeted by the CBI, and should be given such work where they cannot use their pen power for their personal gains. 10.10 A wr'rt and/or an order in the nature of wrlt of running mandamus do issue to the respondents to arrange provisions to keep check on the conduct oftheir subordlnates regularly. 10.11 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court, may deem fit in the facts and circumstances ofthe case. 10.12 Cost ofthe petition may also be awarded." 3. On a bare perusal of the averments made in the writ petition, it becomes apparent that the averments in the writ petition are too vague. The petitioner has not come forward wlth any specific instance, which is the root cause for his grievance projected in the writ petition. 4. In this view of the matter, we decline to entertain the writ petition flled by petitioner Sanjay Nayak as 'Public tntere^ Litigation'. 5. The writ petition, therefore, fails and is hereby dismissed summarily. 6 .The security amount of Rs.5000/- deposited by the petitioner be refunded to the petitioner. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge subbu