Civil Revision No. 2022 of 2009 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2022 of 2009 Date of decision: 7.05.2009. Baldeep Singh Petitioner Versus Jeeta Masih and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Anil Chawla, Advocate the petitioner. Mr. Rajinder Sharma, Advocate for the respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Vivek Singal, Advocate for the respondent no.3 ***** S.D.ANAND, J. In all, the claim petitionwas allowed in favour of the petitioner and three others i.e. Jagjit Kaur, Baldeep Singh and Rupinder Kaur. Insofar as the claimants other than Charanjit Kaur are concerned, the amount of their share had already been disbursed to them. Charanjit Kaur died thereafter. The amount pertaining to her share is lying deposited in an FDR. Petitioner Baldeep Singh applied to the learned MACT/District Judge, Amritsar for disbursement of the amount pertaining to the share of Charanjit Kaur. The plea did not find favour with the learned Tribunal. It was of the view that the request is premature. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner is Civil Revision No. 2022 of 2009 -2- **** named as a nominee in the FDR record and there also is a registered will executed by Charanjit Kaur (in respect of this very amount) in his favour. He otherwise informs that he would be willing to file an indemnity bond qua that amount. In view of the fact that Charajit Kaur is dead, the request for disbursement of the amount lying deposited in her name cannot be said to be premature. The petition shall stand disposed of with a direction to the learned Tribunal to disburse the amount of the share of Charanjit Kaur to the petitioner, if he is able to prove that there is a registered will in respect of this amount in his favour and also that he is indicated as the nominee in the documentation pertaining to the obtaining of the impugned FDR. May 07, 2009 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge