IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37954 of 2010 PURUSHOTTAM LAL LAT S/O LATE BARBARILAL LAL………..PETITIONER Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 18.11.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. There is allegation about receiving of Rs. thirteen lac. On failure to pay the same, it was agreed to transfer seven katthas of land, but later on lesser area of the land was transferred valued Rs. one lac. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner has been made accused due to being father of co-accused Aakash to whom really payment was made. Land is also transferred by him if that is done in presence of this petitioner in my view also may never be taken for refusal of anticipatory bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri A.K. Thakur, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Sitamarhi in connection with Complaint Case No.C-1/1836/2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.)