'.;-^:. ^f'- 1 • -1 '^ ^' V^^S'^r'^yWi^SS:iS!SSii?Sl^fflS^SS^ SiV3iii^yff!^^ \^f^1^ A': % p%-7S^o3 f^J SHi SIAII ^ IiISIHA31IV£ 'miBmALs PE3NGIPAL 'BMQR s J^ALP®.. <33-3 0<A- N0< 199^. m^sst Shasakerlal Tanirakar son of iate p<L< Tamrakai',aged ^ years, Asslstsat Sngi2ieer(Designs) , Water Besouj'ees Bepax'teent^ Mahana^l Pro.}eet,Kaipur, resident of Eouse No »22, Sundern.agar ,Baipur ,MP < vs. APH.IGAK!1! 1 • Ihe S-ba-fce of Madhya Eradesh, Ibrough the Seeret£a?y, BepartBieiat of Water Kesources, Vallabh BhaTan, Bhopal. 2. The .Sngineer-ln-Cfalef, Water Besources Bepaz'tm%t,©ovt.of MP ShlTaj1 Nagar, Bhopal • 3. The Ghief Eagineer, Mahaaadi Project, Water Besoxirces Bepartment, Govt. of Madhya Pradesh, Saipur. -aESPQNEESiTS APPLICMI®UEJEiR SEGTIO? 19 QP IBE ^iMI§3®A£IMJSE]M^^_ACT.198^. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 889 of2005 APPLICANTS : Shankerlal Tamrakar. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : The State ofMadhya Pradesh & Others. APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRTOUNALS ACT, 1985 SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: None for the oetitioner. Sliri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer forthe State. ORDER fORAL^ (Passed on 07tn day of September, 2009) The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor any representation is made on behatf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. In view ofthe above, the matter is dismissed for want ofprosecution. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Ajiut