CWP(T) No. 5976 of 2008(OA No.2143/99) 3.6.2010 Present: Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, counsel for petitioner No.1. Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. Advocate General, for the respondents. The learned Addl. Advocate General has stated that vide office order dated 8.7.2002, both the petitioners were appointed on temporary/probation basis as Patwari against vacant posts. He has further stated that petitioner No.1 Naresh Kumar has died. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that in view of the death of petitioner No.1 the petition filed by him does not survive. She has also stated that since the petitioner No.2 was also appointed as Patwari vide office order dated 8.7.2002, therefore, the petition filed by petitioner No.2 also does not now survive. In these circumstances, the petition is dismissed as rendered infructuous. (Kuldip Singh) Judge June 3, 2010 (sks)