:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.688 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3904 OF 2000 Smt.Shalini R. Korad .. Applicant. v/s. State of Maharashtra & ors. .. Respondents. Mr.R.K.Mendadkar for applicant. Mr.C.R.Sonawane, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No.1 to 4. CORAM : R.M. LODHA AND R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED : 18th March, 2005 P.C. Heard. 2. For the reasons stated in the civil application, we are satisfied that the advocate for the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause in appearing before the court when the writ petition was called out and dismissed in default. 3. In the application, the applicant has stated that the writ petition survives as on date. 4. The inconvenience caused to the respondents may be compensated by award of cost of Rs.1000/-. :2: 5. We, accordingly, allow the civil application and restore the writ petition No. 3904 of 2000 to file subject to the applicant paying cost of Rs.1000/- to the respondent Nos.1 to 4. Nobody has appeared for respondent No.5 and accordingly, no cost is awarded to them. 6. Civil application stands disposed of. (R.M. LODHA, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)