IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.518 of 2010 VIPIN KUMAR @ RAVI RANJAN KUMAR S/O SRI DEEPAK KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Deoeshwar Prasad Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ----------- 05. 16.07.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioner, who has been declared juvenile and is facing accusations under Sections 392 of the Penal Code, has renewed prayer for bail in view of the liberty so granted to him by order dated 02.07.2009 (Annexure-1). It is stated that petitioner is in custody since 17.07.2008. Not a single witness on behalf of the prosecution has been examined. Status report called for in this case indicates that charges were framed recently. The case is posted for examination of witnesses. It is further submitted that the dependent of the present application, namely, father and step-mother will stand as sureties. It is also stated that father will file an undertaking in the Court below to take full responsibility in respect of the juvenile and shall approach the Court below for cancellation of bail if it is found that the juvenile after release has not mended himself. It is also stated that it will be the responsibility of the father to produce the petitioner on the dates fixed in the case so that the trial is not delayed on his account for any single day. Considering all the submissions and after going through the materials on record, this Court is persuaded to release the petitioner on bail. Let petitioner, above named, be released on 2 bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Juvenile Justice Board, Patna in connection with J.J.B. case no. 363 of 2008, arising out of Kadam Kuan P.S. Case no. 214 of 2008, subject to the following two conditions:- (i) Two bailors shall be father and step- mother of the petitioner. (ii) Father of the petitioner shall file an undertaking in terms of the statement made hereinabove. During the period on which the juvenile is on bail if it is found that he can be himself indulged in any criminal case that shall be treated as breach of the condition of the present grant of bail and the trial Court shall cancel the bail bond(s) of the petitioner and secure his arrest in accordance with law. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)