1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.224 OF 2009 (Dinkar s/o Vishnu Mahajan vs. State and others) ___________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 5, 2009 Heard Shri Dahat, learned Counsel for the petitioner. The petition is directed against the orders dated 21.8.2006 and 17.6.2008 passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal whereby original application as well as review application of the petitioner came to be rejected. Shri Dahat, learned Counsel for the petitioner, states that claim of the petitioner for grant of promotion to the post of Junior Engineer has been denied by the respondents without any justification and in a most arbitrary manner. It is contended that assessment of eligibility of the petitioner as Sub-Overseer was done on the basis of seniority list, which was not a genuine and correct seniority list 2 and, therefore, whole process is vitiated. Consequently, decision taken by the Coordination Committee in this regard is bad in law. We have considered the contentions canvassed by the learned Counsel for the parties and perused the impugned orders. The observations made in para (13) of the impugned order dated 21.8.2006 shows that the Tribunal has carefully scrutinized the list of Sub-Overseers, which was considered by the Coordination Committee and found that decision taken by the Coordination Committee is just and proper since other Sub-Overseers whose names were mentioned in the impugned order were senior to the petitioner and the Coordination Committee, even otherwise, found petitioner not fit for promotion. In view of these specific findings, no case is made out for showing indulgence. The petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE khj