IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1964 of 2006 RAJESHWAR PRASAD VERMA Versus MD.ZAMIL AKHTAR ----------- 3 11.12.2008 In the opinion of this Court, the impugned order rejecting the prayer of the defendant-tenant in a suit for eviction questioning the valuation of the suit and consequently the pecuniary jurisdiction has been decided by the Court below on a correct analogy of fact and right application of law. The reasons assigned by the Court below in the last paragraph of the order in rejecting such prayer of the petitioner, does not suffer from any jurisdictional error. Accordingly, this Civil Revision application being wholly misconceived is hereby dismissed and the trial Court is directed to proceed with the further proceedings of the eviction suit so that the eviction suit of the year, 2003 gets disposed of within a period of nine months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)