IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.828 of 2009 Between: B.Anna Reddy … Petitioner And V.Seshadri and antoher … Respondent. The Court made the following: HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.828 of 2009 ORDER: - (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice D.S.R.Varma) Heard the petitioner in person and the learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents. The complaint of the petitioner is that the respondents have been violating the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.11636 of 1998, dated 09.06.1998, wherein it was observed as under: - “ Heard the petitioner in person and also the learned Government Pleader for Home. As the petitioner has been restored with the possession by an order of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupati, which is lawful, it is always better that any attempts by the adversary to dispossess the petitioner or damage the crops raised by him is to be protected rather than wait for the damage to be done and then take action. As such, we hold that whenever there are any attempts to commit Criminal Acts, the petitioner may lodge police complaint in writing and on such complaint being lodged, the Police shall swing into action and protect the interest of the petitioner apart from taking criminal action against the accused.” Notwithstanding the said directions, the petitioner appears to have approached the respondents’ office to implement the same, but no action has been taken by the Collector. Therefore, he seeks interference of this Court. Now, a report has been furnished by the Tahsildar, Y.V.Palem Mandal, who is added as respondent No.2 herein, to the effect that the petitioner has been inducted into possession to an extent of Ac.4-92 cents, which actually is in possession of the petitioner. It is also further stated in the report that the Mandal Surveyor and Village Revenue Officer along with the Village Servant also inspected the land and boundaries also were shown to the petitioner and that the land in which the petitioner is in possession is free from all encroachments and there is no objection by the adjacent pattadars or by any villagers. The petitioner also further decided to have cleared the bushes in the land to an extent of Ac.1-00. Since there was no objection whatsoever either from the Revenue Authorities or from the Villagers, the petitioner can now peacefully bring the land into cultivation and presently the petitioner is busy in bringing the land in cultivation. In view of the said report by the Tahsildar, we do not find any reason to continue the contempt case, any longer. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed, without any further orders being passed at the stage of admission. No order as to costs. ________________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA _________________________ JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO 20-08-2009. Lmv