IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-20111 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision : 14.9.2009 Sattu @ Sat Pal Singh and another ....Petitioner Versus Jaswant Kaur ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.S.S.Joshi, Advocate for the petitioners. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The only plea which has been taken while impugning the order dated 6.3.2009 is that the petitioners are subjected to the same allegations twice over. It is contended that the petitioners were discharged in the earlier proceedings initiated by the respondent- complainant and that the subsequent complaint is not maintainable. A perusal of the documents shows that the petitioners were discharged in the proceedings under Sections 107/151 Cr.P.C. on technical grounds. Besides this, the subsequent complaint was preferred under the provisions of Sections 324, 325, 504, 506/34 IPC. The discharge of the petitioners under the provisions of Sections 107/151 Cr.P.C. cannot be construed to be an impediment for the complainant to prosecute the petitioners under the aforesaid offences. The order of the revisional court vide which it had upset the order of Crl.Misc.No.M-20111 of 2009 (O&M) -2- the Magistrate discharging the petitioners, therefore, cannot be said to be erroneous. Thus, there is no infirmity in the impugned order. Dismissed. 14.9.2009 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss