Jo C3 (:53 IW mm gmw IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATIAGAR AT BILAPUSK W.Pclsl K 2’ @!g\\,‘SB . .l / PETETIONER— Chandan Lal Nagpure S/o late Shri laxaman Nagpure aged about 61 year’s C— Somvaj, C.S.A.F. lst Battalion, Bhilai, Distt-Durg (C.G.) RESPONDENTS 1 ./‘ @fa'te of 'Chhattisgarh, through “\WV ....... a?) Secretary of home department, W p/\Q............ D.K.S.BhaWaI1, GE. ROad Ralpur (CG.) 2. K The Inspector general of police (C.S.A.F.) Head Off1ce Bhilaj Range, ¢’ ¢ ;f '. /,iv '-. ? ‘ 6TS . . . . . . . . Bhilai, District Durg. (C.G.) /., 3. Commandant, lst Battalion C.s.A.F. Bhilai, Distt-Durg‘(c.G.) WRIT PETION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ‘ [to INDIA ‘ : Chandan Lal Nagpure. VERSUS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. '‘’‘' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PE’ITIION (S) No. 1402 0f2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PEIIIIONUNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. ' v .L.xAr Present: Shri Vivek Shanna, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Government Advocate for the State/respondents. ORDER ORAL ‘ (Passed on 14 ‘day ofMarch, 201 1) The petitioner claims benefit under Annexure P/2 and P/5, seeking time bound promotion with consequential benefit on the gound that since the petitioner had completed more than 20 years of service on the post of constable in the year 1988, the petitioner ought to have been considered for promotion to the post of Head Constable. 2. The fact remains that the petitioner has retired from the post of Head Constable on 31.05.2009. Thus, the relief for considering his name of for promotion under Annexure P/2 and P/4 cannot be granted, as the aforestated annexures do not provide for automatic promotion to any post. It simply provides for sending the name and that ought to have been done earlier. At this stage, no such direction to send the name ofthe petitioner, can be passed. 3. The petition is berett ofmerit and is accordingly dismissed. MM Sdl- smSH 1c ANGN‘H0R1 , Judge