IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34788 of 2008 1. BISHUNDEO RAI 2. KISHUNDEO RAI 3. CHUMAN RAI 4. SHAILESH RAI 5. BABBAN DEVI 6. CHAMPA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 28/11/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a police case under Sections- 307, 323, 324, 452, 354, 379, 147and 149 of I.P.C. The allegations are in the back ground of a drainage dispute. There is a case and counter case. In the case filed by the present petitioners, the present informant and others re stated to have been enlarged on regular bail. The injuries noticed from the case diary in the impugned order of rejection appear to be simple in nature. No special circumstances have been urged to accord any different treatment to the petitioners. The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioners shall be appropriately considered by the court below on its own merits, in accordance with law, in like manner as that of the present informant and others - 2 - granted regular bail, without being prejudiced by the present order of rejection. KC ( Navin Sinha, J )