HjGH CQURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR DIV1SION BENCH CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI S.R. NAYAK, CJ & HON'BLE SHRI D.R. DESHMUKH, J. PETmONER Wnt Petition No.116 of 2006 All Agriculturists of Vill. Raliya & Bhilai Bilaspur VERSUS RESPQNDENTS 1. 2. 3. 4. State of C.G. Through Secretary, Deptt. of Land Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) Collector, Bilaspur (C.G.) Sub-Divisional Land Acquisition Officer, Bilaspur Genera! Manager, N.T.P.C., Seepat Bi'aspur (C.G.) Present: Shri Vinay Harit, leamed Dy. A.G. for the State. Shri Prashant Mishra, learned Sr. Advocate with Shri V. Tiwari, learned counsel for respondent No. 4. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 24th August, The foiiowing ora! order of the Court was passed by S.R. NAYAK, CJ . A letter addressed to Hon'fele the Chief Justice of th!s Court was registersd as writ petition and notices were ordered. The crux of the aitegation contained in the ietter is that there exist two drains for carrying water to the lands of the petitioners from Hardadih canai and Raliya canal; the said drains have been d^maged on account of the construction of Ash Dyke aeross those drains Shereby stopping the water ">ow to the iands of the petitioners, thereby rendering the lands of the petitioners uncultivable and use!ess. in the reply filed by the respondent No. 4, General Manager, i""i KtrA^- N.T.P.C., Seepat, this allegation is squareiy denied and it is contended that there are no such drains on the lands acquired by the State Governmentfor N.T.P.C. for construction of Ash Dyke. It is also denied that on account of the construction of the Ash Dyke, the lands of the petitioners are not rendersd uncuitivable or usetess. !n the cireumstance, we think that there is no n.eed for taking further steps or to monitor further. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Nocosts. CH Sd/- Chief Justlce Sdf- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge