- w HIGH-COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH AT BiLASPUR Writ Petition fS) No. 1 764 of 2008 Petitioner Respondente Prannath Churahe, S/o Shri Dayaram Churahe, aged about 68 years, R/o Viliage - Kotart, Post Kota", Tahsi!- Lormi, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretery, Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Accounfant Generai, State of 2. 3. Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) Block Education Officer Lormi, District- Biiaspur (C.G.) 4. Principa! Govsrnment Higher Secondary Schooi Kotari, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) WRST PETSTOIN UNDER ARTSCLE 225 OF THE CONSTITUTiON OF iNDIA Singte Bench : Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri K. S. Pawar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A. S. Kachwaha, Dsputy Advocate Genera! for the respondente No. 1, 3 and 4. Miss Sharmiia Singhai, Assistant Soiicitor General for the Union of tndia/ RespondenS No.2. -•" 3. ORAL ORDER (Passed on ihis 25 day of March, 2008) With the consent of learned counse! appearing for the parties, 8ie matter is heard finally. This matter pertains to retrial dues. This Court in ttie matter ofWrit PetiSion No. 4642/2004 ^aijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & others) and other connectsd matters, decided on 31.1.2008, directed the CommitSee to consider the matter of retria 1 dues as She disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constifruted by the State Government, pursuant to She order dated 19.6.2006 passed in W.P.No. 19S1/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chapdrakar Vs. State Government and others) and order dated /!" S^ '' ^ 1 "^y 4. Thakur 13.3.2008 passsd in M.C.C. No. 105/2008 (State of Chhattisgarh and others Vs. Baijnath Mandal and anottier). Thus, friis petition is squareiy covered by ttie judgment and order a'ated 31 of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chha sgarh & others) and other connected matters, as submitted by tearned counsel appearing forthe parties. Witt the consent of the parties, this petition is accordingiy disposed of in the same terms i.e. the office ^f 4^-rt Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Commi8ee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, ttse Committee shal! issue notice to the petitioner and the officers concemed, within a ftirther period of 15 days. The Committee shai! consider and pass ordsr, in accordaiice witts !aw, after affording proper opportunit/ of hearing to She petitioner. The petitioner and the ofRcer concerned may fiie additiona! documents, if necessar/. The entire exercise, including payment of retria! dues, if any, to the petitioner be comp!sted wittiin a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy ofSiis order. The petttioner shal! supply extra copy of the petition to I'eamed counsel appearing for the respondente, for onward fransmission to She said committee. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri j Judge *'St-