1 16 S.B. CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO. 256/1994. LRs of Nar Mal Vs. LRs of Hasti Mal ... Date of Order :: 19th August 2010. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr. K.C. Samdariya, for the appellants. Mr. R.K. Thanvi ] Mr. Narendra Thanvi ], for the respondents. ..... BY THE COURT: The learned counsel appearing for the appellants- defendants pleads no instructions with the submissions that despite his having sent communication way back in the month of December 2009 on the known address of the appellants, he has not received any response or instructions in the matter; and he finds himself unable to proceed and to assist the Court. In view of the submissions so made by the learned counsel for the appellants-defendants, it appears that even sending of a notice of hearing to the appellants-defendants would be an exercise in futility because no other address of the appellants is available on record except the one stated in the memo of appeal. When the counsel himself has not been able to secure response from the known address, no useful purpose would be served by sending notices. Having regard to the circumstances and for none else being present for the appellants, this Court has no option but to dismiss this appeal in default. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. //Mohan//