1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6988 OF 2009 (Pradip Vs. The State) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Mr. V.G.Salgare, Adv., for the petitioner. Mrs. R.K.Ladda, AGP for respondent State. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & K.U. CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATE :9th NOVEMBER, 2009. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner is entitled to file a fresh proposal in accordance with the Scheme framed by the State of Maharashtra. 3. The petition is disposed of. As petitioner's proposal was for 2008-2009, which academic year is over, we do not express any opinion on the merits of the matter. [K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.] [NARESH H.PATIL, J.] agp/wp6988-09