IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2944 of 2008 1. JAGARNATH RAI 2. CHANAR RAI 3. BADRI RAI 4. BAIJNATH RAI 5. RAM NARESH RAI 6. JITENDRA RAI 7. BRAJESH RAI 8. ASHOK RAI 9. SURENDRA RAI 10. BIRENDRA RAI 11. INDRAJEET RAI 12. NANDU RAI @NAND LAL RAI 13. SRI NARAYAN RAI ----PETITIONERS Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. DHRUV NARAYAN DUBEDI ----OPP.PARTIES ----------- 08. 20.07.2010 Heard both sides. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that pursuant to investigation charge sheet has already been submitted leading to order taking cognizance. It is admitted at the Bar that trial has already commenced in which some of the witnesses have been examined. Consequently the present application has become infructuous. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as having become infructuous Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)