IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 11214 of 2004 Between: P.Kishan, s/o Mallaiah, r/o H.No.1-12-2/T/C/1, Near Govt.Hospital, Jammijunta, Medak District. ..... PETITIONER AND The Regional Manager, APSRTC, Medak Region, Sanga Reddy, Medak District. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not considering the Revision Petition, dated 31-3-2004 which was received on 1-4-2004 which was filed against the proceedings No.PA/28(10)/2004-DVM;SRD, dated 18-3-2004 of the Divisional Manager, Medak Division, Sanga Reddy who confirmed the proceedings No.M1/2(18)/97-MDK, dt.8-1-1998 of the Depot Manager, Medak Depot is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent to consider the Revision Petition dt.31-3-2004 Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.J.M.NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent: MR.K.HARINATH The Court Made the Following : ORDER: The present writ petition is filed by the petitioner questioning the order passed by the disciplinary authority, who imposed a penalty of reduction of pay by two incremental stages with cumulative effect. For which the petitioner preferred an appeal before the Divisional Manager, APSRTC on 25.02.1998, which was rejected by the appellate authority on 18.03.2004. Against the said orders, a revision petition is filed before the respondent- Revisional Authority. The grievance of the petitioner is that the revisional authority has not passed appropriate orders in respect of filing the revision petition, dated 31.03.2004. At the request of the counsel appearing for both the parties, the main writ petition, itself, is heard and disposed of. The respondent-revisional authority has to pass appropriate orders as per law, because it is a statutory revision. Therefore, the respondent- revisional authority is directed to pass appropriate orders on the revision petition dated 31.03.2004 filed by the petitioner, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, with the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. In the circumstances of the case, no costs. 05.07.2004 KLP ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //True Copy// SECTION OFFICER To The Regional Manager, APSRTC, Medak Region, Sanga Reddy, Medak District. 2. Two C.D.copies.