..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2262 OF 2008 Nilesh Ramesh Pawar. ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. .... Mr.A.P.Mundargi, Sr.Counsel a/w. Mr.Niranjan Mundargi,Adv. for the applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste, APP, for State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 12th August, 2008. DATED : 12th August, 2008. DATED : 12th August, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.27 of 2007 of Sangli City police station. The said case is mainly under Section 302 of IPC. 3. There is no eye witness who involves the present applicant. There is no recovery of weapon at his instance. The learned APP pointed out that there is recovery of ornaments and blood stained slipper at the instance of the applicant. As far as slipper is concerned, the C.A. report is ..(2).. inconclusive. I find much merit in the submission that the recovery of ornaments does not necessarily mean that the applicant committed the crime, as the applicant could have come into possession of these ornaments at the later stage through some other source. Looking to all these facts, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. 4. The applicant - Nilesh Ramesh Pawar to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The applicant shall report to Sangli City Police Station once in a week, till conclusion of the trial. 5. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)