(1) CRI. APLN. 4085.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4085 OF 2010 Shaligram Arjun Gaikwad and ors. APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra RESPONDENT ..... Mr. Joydeep Chatterji, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. B.J. Sonawane, A.P.P. for the respondent/State. ..... CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 1ST DECEMBER, 2010 ORAL ORDER:- 1. The applicant no.6 Shri B.P. Zawar is absent notwithstanding the directions given by this Court. The learned Advocate Mr. Joydeep Chatterji submits that the said applicant is admitted in hospital and is unable to attend due to old age ailments and hospitalization. He has placed on record a medical certificate to such effect. 2. Absence due to medical reasons cannot be taken into account at this juncture and his Application is rejected without considering the (2) CRI. APLN. 4085.2010 merits of his case, only on the ground of his default because it is not the stage of investigating the fact situation regarding his admission in the hospital and showing sympathy to him. It is not un-common that sometimes the hospitalization is the methodology resorted when attendance is required. The Application is accordingly rejected. Sd/- [V. R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp