1 rpa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 563 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 563 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 563 OF 2008 ....................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda . of Coram, appearances, Court’s . Orders or directions and . Registrar’s Order Court’s or Judge’s Order ....................................................... Mr.Y.S.Jahagirdar, Sr.Counsel i/b.A.G.Jamale for the Petitioner. Mr.D.A.Nalawade, G.P. for Respondent No.1. Mr.P.P.Chavan i/b.Little & Co. for Respondent No.2. CORAM : J.N.PATEL AND CORAM : J.N.PATEL AND CORAM : J.N.PATEL AND S.S.SHINDE, JJ. S.S.SHINDE, JJ. S.S.SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 24TH MARCH, 2008. DATE : 24TH MARCH, 2008. DATE : 24TH MARCH, 2008. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- . The learned counsel for the Respondent No. 2 tenders his affidavit-in-reply. The same is taken on record. 2. In so far as other Respondents are concerned, as the main Respondent has filed his affidavit-in-reply, their reply to the Petition is not necessary. 3. On going through the pleadings in the Petition as well as in the 2 affidavit-in-reply filed by the Respondent No.2, in so far as there are disputed question of facts arising out of it which are averried by the Petitioner against Respondent No.2. In case Petitioner is aggrieved by the termination of the contract which is subject matter of the challenge in the Petition, he has an alternative remedy to approach the Civil Court. We therefore permit the Petitioner to withdraw the Petition and seek alternative remedy. The Petition is dismissed. (J.N.PATEL, J.) (J.N.PATEL, J.) (J.N.PATEL, J.) (S.S.SHINDE,J.) (S.S.SHINDE,J.) (S.S.SHINDE,J.)