IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 366 OF 2004 Sayaji Mohan Patil ... Applicant versus State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ... Mr. K.Y. Mandlik, for the Applicant. Mr. D.R. More, A.P.P., for the Respondent. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 24th September 2004 P.C.: . An offence has been registered against the Applicant punishable under sections 452, 385, 506, 427 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is not in dispute that the offences punishable under sections 385, 506 and 427 are bailable offences. The only non-bailbale offence alleged is under section 452, I.P.C., which is house trespass, having made preparation for causing hurt, assault, etc. The other accused has already been released on bail in connection with this offence. Taking overall view of the matter, the Applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail on the following terms : a) The Applicant is enlarged on anticipatory bail in connection with CR.No. 84/2004 registered with Islampur Police Station on executing personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one or two local sureties in the like amount. b) The Applicant will abide by the conditions contained in section 438(2), Cr.P.C., as applicable to the State of Maharashtra. . Application disposed of accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)