FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 38 OF 2011 SANJAY BHAGWATRAO BHOSALE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS ... Advocate for Petitioner : In Person AGP for Respondent(s): Shri Dighe V.H. ... CORAM : D B BHOSALE & S B DESHMUKH, JJ. Dated: July 25, 2011 ... 1. Heard petitioner - in person and learned AGP for respondents 2. In this Writ Petition, the main prayer made by the petitioner reads thus : " By issuing writ of mandamus or any other writ or order, directions in the like nature, the respondents may kindly be directed to implement the rules framed for prohibition of transport / heavy / long vehicles during the period from 6.00 a.m. to 1.00 p.m. and 4.00 p.m. to 9.00 p.m., in the Aurangabad city area strictly accordance with the provisions of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988" 3. We find the prayer very strange. It is obligatory on all the authorities to follow the Act / Rules, if any, in respect of an entry of long / heavy vehicles in the city. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not place any Rules as such on record prohibiting entry of particular type of vehicles in the city during particular hours. In view thereof, we are satisfied that the Writ Petition can be disposed of with the following observation. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS (2) PIL/38/2011 (A) The concerned authority shall follow the Rules, if any, in respect of an entry of heavy / long vehicles in the city of Aurangabad during particular hours. 4. With these observation, Writ Petition is disposed of. ( S B DESHMUKH, J. ) ( D B BHOSALE, J. ) akl