1 9067.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9067 OF 2010 Shri.Shankar Ramu Ingle ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Shiva Patil for Petitioner. Mrs.S.S.Bhende, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1. Mr.V.S.Paradkar for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED:- MARCH 15, 2011. P.C. 1. The grievance in this Petition is that the pension offered to the petitioner is not in consonance with the provisions of the M.C.S. (Pension) Rules, 1982 and more so, in the light of clarification issued by the School Tribunal in its order dated 29th August, 2007 in Miscellaneous Application No.22/2007. On the earlier occasion, we called upon the learned A.G.P. to ascertain as to the status of the pension proposal of the petitioner pending before the Appropriate Authority. Today, we are informed by the learned A.G.P. that the original proposal received from the Management of the School after order of the Tribunal dated 25th August, 2006 was duly 2 9067.10 processed by the Authority and pension is already offered to the petitioner on the basis of the said proposal. She further submits that no further proposal has been submitted by the Management after the clarificatory order passed by the Tribunal on 27th August, 2007 in MA No.22/2007. 2. In the light of this submission, Counsel for the Management on instructions of Respondent No.3 Principal, who is personally present in Court submits that if the petitioner presents himself in his office on 24th or 25th March, 2011, he would take necessary measures to submit further pension proposal to the Appropriate Authority in the context of the clarificatory order passed by the Tribunal dated 27th August, 2007 in MA No.22/2007. The further proposal would be submitted to the Appropriate Authority by the School Authority within two weeks thereafter. That assurance is accepted. 3. The petitioner through Counsel submits that the petitioner would remain present in the Office of the respondent No.3 on 24th March, 2011 at around 11.00 a.m. Respondent No.3 has taken notice of this position and would make himself available at his Office on that day around the same time. 3 9067.10 4. The learned A.G.P. submits that as soon as the further proposal is received from the School Authorities, the Appropriate Authority would process the same and issue appropriate orders as may be required in the fact situation of the case. That will be done not later than six weeks from the date of receipt of the proposal. 5. Accordingly, the Petition is disposed of on the above terms. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)