IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 3124 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 3124 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 3124 OF 2005 Ramdayal G. Gupta & Ors. ... Petitioners V/s. The Chairman/Chief Executive ... Respondents Officer and Competent Authority S.R.A. & Ors. Mr. K.P. Tiwari i/b. M/s. K.P. Tiwari & Co. for petitioner. Mr. K.R. Belosey for respondent No. 2. Mr. A.B. Mishra for respondent Nos. 3 & 4. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 10th November, 2006 : 10th November, 2006 : 10th November, 2006 P.C. . In the Annexure II produced before us, the petitioners are held to be entitled to only one strcture. Earlier that structure was held as residential and thereafter an order was passed that the structure is commercial. The contention of the petitioners is that they are also entitled to residential premises. The name of the petitioners in the Annexure II is not shown as entitled to two structures but only one structure. If the petitioners are aggrieved with the entries in the Annexure II, the petitioners to take steps in law to which they are ( 2 ) entitled to. 2. With the above observation the petition stands disposed of. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks stay of the order. The prayer is rejected. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]