1 N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. APPEAL (LODG.) NO.770 OF 2008 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2650 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.1994 OF 2007 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4440 OF 2008 IN APPEAL (LODG.) NO.770 OF 2008 Ramulu B. Shekelli ..Appellant. Vs. Mohamed Afzal Mohamed Ismail Memon and others ..Respondents. .... Ms. Sheela Tambe i/b Mr. Manoj Bhatt for the Appellant. Mr. M.Y. Sayani for Respondent No.1. Ms. S.M. Poddar for the Appellant in Appeal 501 of 2008. .... CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 3rd March, 2009. P.C. : 1. There is no objection to Notice of Motion 4440 of 2008 for condonation of delay. The Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 2. With the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the 2 parties, the Appeal itself is taken up for hearing. 3. It is commonly conceded that connected matter between the parties had already been referred to sole arbitration of Mr. Rajiv Kumar, advocate. This matter may also be referred to him. Consequently, the entire matter, the Appeal and the suit is referred to the sole arbitration of Mr. Rajiv Kumar. The parties to appear before the sole arbitrator who shall dispose of the matter in accordance with law. The Appeal is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.