IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. -M No. 4839 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : 24.04.2009 Tarsem Lal Hans .... PETITIONER Versus State of Punjab ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. Vivek Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Gill, DAG, Punjab. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral ) This order be read in continuation of the order dated March 06, 2009. Counsel for the petitioner states that in terms of the said order, the petitioner has furnished the personal bonds and surety bond, which have been accepted and attested by the trial court on 26.3.2009. This fact has not been disputed by counsel for the respondent-State. In view of the aforesaid fact, the interim order dated 6.3.2009 is made absolute. Petition is accordingly disposed of. April 24, 2009 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE