IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD Crl.A.M.P.No.184 of 2010 and Criminal Appeal No.1361 of 2008 Crl.A.M.P.No.184 of 2010 Between: Ramavath Neela …. Petitioner/Complainant AND: Komati Sudhakar and 2 others ….. Respondents/accused Criminal Appeal No.1361 of 2008 Between: Battu Srinivasulu and others .. Petitioners AND State of Andhra Pradesh, reptd. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. .. Respondent COMMON JUDGMENT: The de facto complainant, her mother (PW.2) and accused 2 and 3 are present before the Court. Heard Sri C. Padmanabha Reddy, learned senior counsel for accused 2 and 3 and Sri P. Vamsheedhar Reddy, learned counsel for the de facto complainant/ victim, who represented that the parties compounded the compoundable offences punishable under Sections 342 and 354 of the Indian Penal Code. The parties also stated the same before the Court and requested for acquittal of the accused 2 and 3. Accordingly, the de facto complainant/victim and accused 2 and 3 are permitted to compound the offences punishable under Sections 342 and 354 of the Indian Penal Code and the accused 2 and 3 are acquitted of the said offences under Section 320 read with Section 235 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, setting aside the conviction and sentences imposed on accused 2 and 3 in respect of the said offences by the judgment dated 10-11-2008 in S.C.No.104 of 2007 on the file of Special Sessions Judge for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Nalgonda. The Criminal Miscellaneous Petition and the Criminal Appeal are ordered accordingly and the parties are informed. _____________________ G. BHAVANI PRASAD, J Date: 22-01-2010 Ksn