55 ^fr' DMSION W : HON'BLE HON'BLE Sl lTi9N.N0.738.pF., S 1 .Rnnli-ar >/o Late Shri Bansi RaiTi Sonkar, Aged around 61 years, Rgtit-arj Guard. S.E.C.RIv- tVioinQriOi'SQdfTl, r<OSiQCriI ^l . Behind Railway Schooi, unsHvsncisnci) N©sr •^ri&K^r Mandir, ^.4^Rondra'r1^rh Distrjct: Korba (CG). :NTS 1. Union of India. i nrouyi'l : 11'le toecreiai'y, Ministry of Railways, i'\Sii ^HSVSu, i^OW USiHL 2. The General Mana.aer, South Eastern Centra! Raiiway, BiiaspurZone, G.M. Office, Bilaspur (CG). 3. The Sr. Divisional Opsrating Manager, South Eastern Centrat R^ilwsv, BH^sDur Diviston. BHssour (CG). 4. The Sr. Divisional Personal Officer. South Eastem Centra!.Rai!way, BHaSpur DivlsioHi DPO. Of^c^, Bilaspur (CG), 5. The Rsglsti'ar, Central Administrative Tribuna!, Caravs Building, South Civi! Lines, Jabalpur (M.P.) Shri B.P. Rao, learned counsel forthe Detitioner. Ms. Samata Jain, learned counsei for the respondents. I'OP.AL ORDER) ?°yn-^-i." —^ ^-<S-. ^ ;n^ S_«;.5^.S».5,=»=-5.- i^:'?!t^=&^- ^.uy^i Th9 fo!!ow!no ordQr ofthQ Court w^s D^sssd bv wak. C.l. i •'-^a. WL^.. 56 ar- .--! The petitioner was decategor'zed on the basis of a' medical report dated 15.03,2000 and "'de order dated 30.08.2CK)0, he was offerec' a'ternative err'pfoyment as Head Contro' Clerk at Bifaspur in the pay-scate of Rs.5000-8000/-. HQ Tofus^d the sltomstiv^ QmDlovmQnt, Lster. hs sousht "oluntary retirement and in pursuance of that request, he was retired w.e.f.11.00.2001. When the matter stood thus, the petft'oner raised demand before the departmsnt that he shou'd paid saiary for the period from 15^03.2000 to 11.09.2001. His request was turned down by the department. Hence, tho pst'tion^r instituted O.A. Mo.555/2004 beforo th@ Cantrs! Adminsstrstive TfLbun^I, J^b^JDur Bsnoh. -Jabslour ffor -short i th©Tnbunsi'). Th©TribuD^! h^vlna oDin©dthat sincs th'9 petitionor r@fus@d to sccopt ths sfr!piovm@nt offer@d bv th@ dsD^rtmsnt ^nd ^dmlttediv hs wss dsc^t^sorteod on 15.03.2000, h9 is not ontitied to D@V ^nd ^dni'ssifote 3!iOW3HC9S for tHQ p9r|od bQt4.?t/98H 15.03.2000 snd 11.09.2001, Ths yisw taken by the Tribunal, in our consjdered opinion, is unexceptionable. S'ncs the p©tjtionorw^s d8C3t9.Qonz&d on m©d!c^ioroynd, th^r^ wss HQ oy^stion of p^tEtfon©rbein<3 contlnusd in thc SSHIQ oost which h9 hsd ^^rilor hojd sftcr 15.03.2000 and s'nce admittedly the petitioner rsfused to accept alternative einpioymsnt offsr^d by the dao^rtm^nt ^s H^^d Contro! Cierk at Blfasour in the pay-scale of Rs.5000-8000/-, he is not entitled to pay and admissibte attowances during the interregnum period of 15.03.2000 and 11.09,2001. Ti-us...t.(n.t.Qetjt'[gn 15 devold of merit and 't is accordinaiv dismissed. No costs. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge ^