Crl. Misc. No. M-23105 of 2010 (O & M) ::1:: IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-23105 of 2010 (O & M) Date of decision: 19.08.2010 Anil and others. .. Petitioners Versus State of Haryana. .. Respondent Present:- Mr.Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. * * * * S.S. SARON, J. This petition is filed by the petitioners seeking quashing of FIR No.263 dated 30.07.2010, registered at Police Station Gannaur, District Sonepat for the offences under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC, Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the marriage between the complainant-Manisha and her husband-Sunil (accused No.1 in the complaint Annexure-P-1) was solemnised on 02.12.2008. It is submitted that petitioner No.1 is the husband's elder brother (Jeth) of the complainant, petitioner No.2 is the husband's sister (Nanad) of the complainant and petitioner No.3 is the husband of petitioner No.2 i.e. Husband's sister's husband (Nandoi) of the complainant. Petitioner No.1, since May, 2007, has been doing the M.Tech course from Panjab University, Chandigarh, as regular student. At present, he is Assistant Professor in the R.P.IIT Institute, situated at Bastara District Karnal. Petitioner No.2 and 3 are married since February, 2007, much prior to the marriage between the complainant and her husband on 02.12.2008. It is further submitted that the petitioners have no concern Crl. Misc. No. M-23105 of 2010 (O & M) ::2:: with the matrimonial life of the complainant and her husband. It is also submitted that the challan in the case has not so far been filed. In the circumstances, the present petition at this stage is premature and the petitioners may in the first instance approach the Investigating Authorities, Sonepat, in order to show that they are not liable for any offence and cancellation report qua them is liable to be filed. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, the present petition is dismissed being premature. (S.S.SARON) August 19, 2010 JUDGE Sukhpreet