1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 23/2006 IN WRIT PETITON NO. 1051/1993 Suryanarayan L. Pandey ..versus.. Shri D.R.Deshmukh, Education Officer, Amravati =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-== Shri Mohan Sudame, Counsel for petitioner Shri Khubalkar, AGP, for respondent no.1 Shri A.B.Patil, counsel for Respondent no.2 C ORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 14th JUNE, 2010. Heard. The record display, the directions about pension to the petitioner are complied with. The petitioner still feels that accounts are not settled, which prima facie rebels the record. The petition is having not pressed, is disposed of. The petitioner if still finds that certain amounts are not correctly accounted for, he shall have communication directly with the institution, the Treasury Officer and the Education Officer. No costs. (K.U.Chandiwal) JUDGE. Rvjalit