IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 523 of 1995 Between: K.Syamasunder Rao S/o.Seetharama Rao, Retd. Govt. employee, R/o.Kamalapuri, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition (General), Hyderabad. 2 B.Vijaya Reddy 3 B.Visweswara Reddy (R.2 and R.3 are impleded as per court order dt.6-2-95 in WPMP.No.2276/95) .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent herein to refer the compensation amount to the court. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. C.SITARAMAYYA (Not present) Counsel for Respondent No.1: GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR LAND ACQUISITION Counsel for Respondents 2 and 3: MR. P.NAGASESHAIAH The Court made the following: ORDER: Yesterday i.e. on 18-01-2005, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the matter is posted “for dismissal” today. Even today, though the matter is posted under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. ____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 19th January, 2005. Ak ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition (General), Hyderabad. 2. Two CCs to the Government Pleader for Land Acquisition, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (O.U.T). 3. Two CD copies.