1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R Birbal Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others. S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 3587/2008 ......... Date of Order : 29/05/2008 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR BY THE COURT Mr. N.A.Rajpurohit for the petitioners. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The grievance of the petitioners is that the petitioners filed an application Annex.6 for including their names in the list amongst the other persons for allotment of land in Colonization area before the respondent No.3 Assistant Commissioner (Colonization), (Administration) Indira Gandhi Nahar Pariyojana, Jaisalmer and without deciding the application, a list has been prepared vide Annex.5 and the respondents are going to allot the land to those who have been included in the list excluding the petitioners and therefore, the petitioners seek a 2 direction to the respondent No.3 to decide the application utmost expeditiously so that names of the petitioners also can be included in the list. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, in my view, it would be more appropriate to permit the petitioners to make a fresh representation to the respondent No.3 Assistant Commissioner (Colonization) (Admn.), Indira Gandhi Nahar Pariyojana, Jaisalmer ventilating their grievances with requisite details within one week from today and if such a representation is made to the respondent No.3, the respondent No.3 shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law within 15 days therefrom. With these directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp 3 S.B.Civil Misc. Stay Petition No.6611/08 IN S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 3587/08 ......... Date of Order : 29/05/2008 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. N.A.Rajpurohit for the petitioners. Since the writ petition itself has been disposed of, the stay petition also stands disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp