c.^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR n;..;< Tax Case (Income Tax Appeal) No. /2008 l1 Appellant , ^ , : ^Assistant Commissionerof ~~^.^.^& ^ ' ^..^'^s^- f-ri''"\ ^\\'J.l ^•^A^v"^^ Income Tax, Circle 1(1), Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS ResDondent ^ ^Raipur Jila Sahkari Sangh Maryadit, Raipur INCOME TAX APPEALU/S.260 A OF INCOME TAX ACT, 1961. XI-HC-22 ...^v' ~-c sn^i^a- h-\M sn^r sft*iictt *if?fl ^' ".) k_s>- ^^. )<?"<.'oS'J 'S^ -<<l<<lct<l, afll'y'iG, Rifii+iy wii?trww<»> 3(I^?T 'tR^f? ^s.a^:..^^s:. .l^i ••^ f 200^ ist^ss' an^FTOiiw^ifOT Diyision Bench:- Hon'ble Shri Dhjrendra Mishra & HQn'!i'a Shr'?U1!. Chandraka.r, JJ Shri S. Rajeshwar Rao, oounse| The matter is listed on default 21.07.2008 forfiling certified oopyofth{ Heard on application for exemFltion impugned order. Leamed counsel for the appe) week's time to comply with the order di ApDiication for exemption impugned order is dismissed as not pr^s It is made clear that if the for the apDellant. |for non-oompliance of order dated impugned order. from filjng oertified copy of the stipulated period, the appeal shafl be ftirther reference to the Bench. SdA i Dhirendra Mishra I Jndge tt»l<ih?T<i1Ti ^m^^ f^& <M^I< ^?3lPOT3Ilta m |ant prays forand is granted four jited 21.07.2008. filing certjfied copy of the •^ssed. default is not removed within the liable to be dismissed without any Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge I-