1 WP No.8818/10 mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8818 of 2010 Madrasa Mohammediya Ahle Sunnat Waijamat ... Petitioner versus Mohammed Hanif Mohammed Ismile Farooqi ... Respondent ... Mr. Avinash H. Fatangare for the petitioner. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 23rd November 2010 P.C. 1. I am not inclined to interfere in exercise of a writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for reasons more than one. The order is interlocutory and calls for no interference. 2. The trial Court has declined to frame and decide the issue of jurisdiction as preliminary issue. Order 14 Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that notwithstanding that a case may be disposed of on a preliminary issue, the Court shall, subject to the provisions of sub- rule(2), pronounce judgment on all issues. Considering this, Court has committed no error by declining to frame and try the issue regarding jurisdiction as a preliminary issue. 3. Writ Petition is rejected summarily. (D.G.KARNIK, J)