‘ IG uT OF ,cHHATTlseARH' AT‘ILAPUR ‘ Coram: nd JJ 3 HH coR BS Hon’bie Shn Dmrendra Mishra & Hon ble Shrl R N Cha rakar Writ Appeal No 89 of 2 11 Dlllp Taank S/o l-larl Lal Bhal Taan Resident of Nmn gnglneerlng Works Taank Para Ranjandgaon Tahsrl and District Ralnandgaon (CG Appellant ° Ptitioner Resipondents ‘ Department Satpuda Bhavan Bhopal I' (MP) Chief Engineer In Public Works I Department Satpuda Bhavan Bhopal (M P) Chief Engineer Publlc/ orks - Department, Ralpurr V Executive Engmeer Pabllc Works Department Durg, DIV N01 District V Durg(MP resent ShnV K Sharma counselforthe appellant Shrl UNS Deo GA forthe State State of Madlhya Hradesh, Through Secretary, Public Works ORALJuDGMEMT (1‘1 03 2011) Appellants Onglnal Application No 84712000 which was subsequently transferred and registered as Writ Petrtlon (S) s . 2. I Indisputably, _ the appelant sent his reSignation on ’ s: . 23 05 1979 clearly stating therein that he be retieved from the post on completion of one month With effect from 29 05 1979 t5: . Thereafter he remamed absent The appellant was also served wxth a letter dated 23 061979 whereby he was required to . No 3374/2005 in this Court for the relief that his re5ignatton ha not been accepted nor retected and he is entitled for the serVice and amount of G P F has been dismissed by learned Single Judge by the impugned order e ) P L ; ‘ k ) W I ‘ l l deposit a sum of Rs.1454.05 as outstan ing dues after a period of 20 years to join the service was rightly rejected by the State. 3. Having heard learned counsei for the appellant, having perused the impugned order, we are of the opinion that looking to the overall conduct of the appellant, learned Single Judge rightly held that the appellant is not entitled for a;ny relief. 4. We find no substance in this Writ appeal. The same deserves to be and is accordingly dismissed. ' i - Sd/— , i ‘ Dhirendra Mishra xvw.‘ n ‘ Judge a ii: