1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2500 OF 2009 (Omkar Shivramji Kadikhaye & oths ..VERSUS.. The Commissioner, Nagpur & oths) =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==- Mr. S.S.Sanyal, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. S.M.Puranik, Advocate for Respondents no.1 to 3. Mr. R.O.Chhabra, Advocate for Respondent no.4 Mr. A.A.SOnak, Advocate for respondent Nos.5 &6 Mr. A.M.Ghare, Advocate for Respondent no.8. C ORAM : D.B.BHOSALE ; and PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. DATED : 23rd June, 2010. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. S.M.Puranik, learned counsel for respondent nos.1 to 3, on instructions, submits that the Nagpur Municipal Corporation has already initiated action against respondent nos.5 & 6, who according to the petitioner, are encroachers on the public road. 3. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press this writ petition. Writ Petition is disposed of as not pressed. JUDGE JUDGE Diwale