1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Civil Application No: 3485/2006 in SECOND APPEAL NO: 656/2005 (Abdul Hamid s/o Ahmed Miya Saudagar vs. Vijay Damodar Narnaware and others) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram Court's or Judges Order appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders. .................................................................................................................................................................. Mr. Yogesh Nayyar, Adv.for applicant CORAM: SMT. Vasanti A. Naik , J. DATED: 30th AUGUST, 2007. *** Heard. By this Civil Application, the applicant seeks permission to serve Respondents 1 , 2,4 to 6 by substituted service. It is stated in the Civil Application that though the applicant tried to serve the aforesaid respondents on the addresses stated by them in RCS No. 30/2000, respondents could not be served on the aforesaid addresses. It is submitted on behalf of the applicant that inspite of serious efforts of the applicant to serve the aforesaid respondents by regular mode of service as well as by Humdast, respondents could not be served. It is further submitted that though efforts were made, 2 the recent addresses of respondents 1, 2,4 to 6 could not be procured. In view of the aforesaid position, it is necessary to permit the applicant to serve respondents 1,2 4 to 6 by publishing notice in daily Newspaper “Lokmat “ which is widely circulated in Mul, which is situated in Nagpur District where respondents 1,2,4 to 6 were known to have lastly resided. Necessary steps should be taken by the applicant to serve respondents 1,2,4 to 6 by substituted service within a period of three weeks from today. Civil Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and disposed of. JUDGE sahare