./'" IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AI BILaSPUR W.P.NO; ! 11.3 / 2004 Petitioner Muilidhar Dewangan S/o Late S.L. Dewagasn, Aged about 38 years, Occupatibn: FieldAssistant Centra! Tasar Silkwonn Seed Station, Lakha, District Raigarh (Cfi) Rf'o Kosta Para, Raigarli District-Raigarh (CG). Versus .?^ if. ^•v^ ^-y .-•'' .<y.^.-'' ^^yr / <'-^e'X / 3. <• .^' ?" A y ^> o,^ -< Deputy Dlrector, Ceatral Tasar Silworm Seed Station, Lakha, Post Box No.25, PO: Raigarh, District: Raigarh(CG). JointDirector, Basic Tasar Silworm Seed Organiation, Satyam Complex, Link Road, Bilaspur, District-Bilaspur-(C.G.) M embsr Secretary, Csntral Silk Board, C.S.B. Gomplex, B.T.M. Layout, PO M adivala, Bangaiore-68 (Karnataka) SVtSJ' PETITION UNDERARTICLE I'KlllTOF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ?'"{ [''-k'f-n ivfmilcSilars ofthe Petitioner ;^ ^ // '^^?- ^a'gAs^& cause title. Parttculars of the resRondents Asper cause title. 3. Particnlars uf the order agamst which the Detition is beinti fUed : I) Orderdated21.tl.2003 Passsd by Rsspondent No.3 . <:y«a'«raiip)<<,fyT;i1<(t*ld;Rrtl^^< ,l^i^^^.....^^.4i^^. sTi^siqa?? (q^fgc^) 3ii^iwiR*ii* (TaiTsii^arwiraT B^ITWrt&ff SlftSVf 26.3.2005 ! Shri s P. Diwaka.r, wtth Shri P.R.Pdtankar, cou hds Shri Ashok Swarnkai Vinay Harit, eounsel for the With the consent of The petitibner namely| Fietd Assistant in Centroil Tc Roigarh (C.6) has been trai) Central Seed Bodrd, Mutugu, By way of This writ pe| Constitution of India, he order dated 21.11.2003 (Ar proyer clause, he had pnay| dated 21.11.2003 andvide it respondents be directed to place of Raigarh. By retie^ respondent no.l be directed^ sataries of the petitioner 25.12.2003. Retum has been counsel for the l responder( fil4d tixiio^li *ii*inV^fls<cltlutt5;i'< ^aiR^aii^r—- 'senior Advocate isel for the petitioner. , Advocate appears Qn behalf of 5hri (^spondents. •^ieparties.hearcl finally. Murlidhar t)ewangan who Was working as jsar Silkwor'm Seed Station, Lakha, Distt-. ^sferred to Research Extension Centre, [Distt-. Warongal (Andhra Pradesh). etl-ition filed under Article 226/227 of the cjs challengecl the validity of his trfluisfer irjnexure P-3). Vide relief No.7.1 of the sd for quashmentof the tronsfer order i^elief No.7.2 he had fui'ther prayed that >ost the petitioner in any of -rtie adjacent No.7.3, the petitioner had prayed tiiat to release all the dues|in respect of the and other benefits with effect from in this case on 20.8.2004; Learned ts draws the att'ention of this court -A- SP/FS/2D05-20,000 ywi'-*iiiyi<*y,»^V<t''i^,R*cwMT; +tl1<9ia»1TT^ w^zoo 3n^T(:13^(%ll3*6) s^tr^Rfltefan^i "2~ «W^S-iHtHtft'^l^^l •(t^l^ ^srf^SII^T sii^rqsiR'ii* as'iian^was'nw towards the document Anne^ure R-1, which is a memorandum dated 06.5,2004 andaccording to 1+iis memorandum, the original transfer orcier of -t+ie petitioner date^i 21.11.2003 has besn modified and now the petitioner has been transferred to Katghora (C.6). In view of the subseqi^ does not survive fbr the main ent order of modification, this petition (•elief of quashin9 fhe transfer order of the petitioner. In fact, the r^liefs no.l or\d 2 sought above hw?been redressed by the rsspondent4 So far as relief no.3 in relation to the salaries of the petitioner i^ concerned, iearned counsel for the respondents submits that let the^petitioner join at h-is transferrec! place and make representatioti to the concemed authority then the matter of salary of the petiti^ner diall be decided by the concemed authority inaccordance wil+i rij les applicable in case of the petitioner; On this statement t|iade by leamed coynsel for the respondents for which the i^espondents are even otherwi^ also obligecl, learned counsel for t^e petitioner has no pbjection in taking that course. In view of the above su^missions made by teomed counsel for the parties, thispetition 'is displosed of at this stage. So far as the first two retiefs are concerned, they nd longer • surviye cxnd so far as relief no.p is concerned, it is directed that the 3 shy2005-20,000 i:^:fiyiiattiajyaii XI-HC-78 <dT*|-^<lyiri^,»Tilwi<»,teiww3'< *tl*tCTlfl?TRW ail^STiRwt'itl^6''®) W^200 gil^CTWfcrtW aanan^CTgnra? g'RTrwtfteiart?! _^ petitioner will file a detailed authority of the departmenj disposeof the representation weeks from the date of filing c »l<<itt.41^tllHrft'^'fe^l •(Rf'^R ^siRWW^t ' , representation beforie the concerned ond the concemed authority shall of the petitioner within a period of 8 f the aforesaid repreantation. 'Wil't'i'thisobservation.tfliispetitionstandsfinally disposed of. i;i Mi< No order as to costs. Sd/- Sunil KumarSinha Judge (r—