PETiTiONERS Sa,l|Sse:ili8g ^ss^^s HiGH COURT OF JUD1CATURE CHHATTLSGARH: BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI H.L. DATTU, CJ. HON'BLE SHR1 V.K. SHRIVASTAVA, J. W.P.No.321 of 2002 1. Nanhi Ram, son of Gangaram Kanwar aged about 45 years. 2. Karamdas, son of Shanichardas Panika, aged about 30 years. 3. Jagdeo, son of Gangaram Kanwar, aged about 40 years. 4. Siyaram, son of Nanhiram, aged about 25 years. 5. Tetkuram, son of Lagansay, aged about45years. 6. Panikram, son of iagansay Kanwar, aged about 32 years. 7. Anupsingh son of Prushay Kanwar, aged about 28 years. 8. Premsay, son of jataram Kanwar, aged about 30 years. 9. Raviram, sonof Ransay Kanwar, aged about 28 years. 10. Dhansay, son of Sangram Kianwar, agsd a&out 35 years. 11. Tejram son of Suritram Kanwar, aged about 23 years. 12. Mayaram son of Govardhan Kanwar, aged about 25 years. 13. Johitram sonof Ransay Kanwar, aged about 32 years. 14. Ramsingh, son of Amardas Kanwar, aged about 25 years. 15. Karamdas son of Shanichardas Panika, aged about 35 years. 16. Athnasiyush son of Johan Toppo, aged about 59 years. 17. Panchram son of Budhram Kanwar, aged about 35 years. 18. Chhabiram son of Ramsay Kanwar, agsd about 22 years. 19. Jeetram son of Ramayan Kanwar, aged about 48 years. 20. Chakar Singh, son of unknown, adult. 21. Deepkumar, son of unknown, adult. Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: Chlef Secretary DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, s „., ""5j!Sto I" (. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. The Secretary, Department of Home Government of Chhattisgarh DKS Bhawan, Mantralay Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3. The Directorate General of Police Department of Home (Govt. of C.G.) Raipur (C.G.) 4. The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, District Raigarh (C.G.) 5. The Station House OTficer Police Station - Chhal Tahsil Dharamjaygarh, Distt. Raigarh. 6. The Station House Officer, Police Station - Dharamjaygarh Tahsil - Dharamjaygarh Distt. Raigarh. 7. Smt. Shanti Bai wife of Guiabsingh aged about 55 years. 8. Ijhar Singh, son of Gulab Singh aged about35years. S!. No. 7 & 8 are resident of vitlage Samarsingha, Chhal, Distt. Raigarh. Shri A.N.Bhakta, counsei for the petitioners. Shri Vinay Harit, Deputy Advocate General for the State. ORAL ORDER {Passed on 13tn March, 2007) The foilowing oral order of the Court was passed by i,A.No.955/2002. By this appiication, the petitioners are seeking exemptaon from payment of security deposit. To maintain a petition by way of public interest Sitigation, the petitioners have to deposit the security amount under the rules. if they are not in a position to deposit the said amount, they can make an application before this Court with appropriate reasons for exemption from payment of the said amount. (2) We have carefully seen the application filed by the petitioners. The reason assigned by thepetitioners, in our opinion, is not satisfactory. pBiSIIJilS^^^ "~'^f- ^3/ Therefore, the request made in the application cannot be granted by us. Accordingly, I.A.No.955/2002 is rejected. (3) Consequently, the writ petition and I.As.No.727/2002 & 4720/2002 also stand rejected. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to make an appropriate appiication for rsvival otthe writ petition after deposit ofthe security amounL ' Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd//- V.K-Shrivastava Judge