IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 3RD AUGUST 2007 / 12TH SRAVANA 1929 RP.No. 731 of 2007(W) ---------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.17206/2007 Dated 03/07/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/RESPONDENT --------------------------------------------- THE SECRETARY, ARPOOKARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, VILLONNI, ARPOOKARA WEST P.O., KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.BOSE RESPONDENT: PETITIONER: ---------------------------------------- K.REMADEVI, W/O. P.K.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR, KUDAVOOR HOUSE,ARPOOKARA EAST P.O., KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SHRI MATHEW JOHN (K). THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- R.P.NO.731 OF 2007 IN W.P.C. NO. 17206 OF 2007 W -------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd August, 2007 ORDER The Review Petition is filed by the Secretary of the Panchayat who is the respondent in the Writ Petition, feeling aggrieved by the Judgment of this Court directing the respondent to consider and take a decision on Ext.P3 in which the prayer was to assign number to the building put up by the writ petitioner in accordance with law. I heard the learned counsel for the review petitioner and the respondent. It is pointed out that the name of the counsel appearing for the Panchayat was not shown in the cause title dated 3.7.2007 and, therefore, he could not be present in Court when the Writ Petition was considered. It is also submitted by the review petitioner that Ext.P3 was not received. This is, of course, disputed by the respondent who also submits that she has filed another application along with the Judgment on 16.7.2007 and RP 731/07 IN WPC 17206/07 W 2 the receipt of the same was acknowledged by the Secretary and, therefore, a decision can be taken. The review petitioner also points out that the time given is also not sufficient. 2. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the Review Petition is disposed of as follows: In modification of the Judgment, there will be a direction to the respondent in the Writ Petition to take a decision on the application dated 16.7.2007 within a period of three weeks from today. K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE kbk.