IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13038 of 2005 1. Jaddi Mandal 2. Pradip Mandal Both sons of Sukdeo Mandal, resident of village-Askatiya, Police Station-Bhawanipur, District-Purnea. Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The District Magistrate, Purnea. 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Dhamdaha, Purnea. 4. The Circle Officer, Bhawanipur Block, Purnea. 5. The Superintendent of Police, Purnea. 6. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Dhamdaha, Purnea 7. The Officer-incharge, Bhawanipur Police Station, District- Purnea. 8. Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Dhamdaha, Purnea. ---------------------------------- 2. 15.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Without going in to the merits of the matter at this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition may be disposed off with liberty to him to approach afresh, the Deputy Collector Land Reforms Damdaha, Purnea who is permitted to be added as respondent no. 8. Learned counsel for the State does not object to the same. In view of the aforesaid the writ petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh representation before the newly added respondent no. 8. If such representation is filed within two months from today alongwith a copy of this order then the concerned respondents will look into it and see if the grievances of the petitioners can be redressed in 2 accordance with law. He should ensure that if the State is empowered under law to act on the grievances of the petitioners, then necessary steps should be taken within the next two months thereafter. Anand Kr. ( Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)