1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.4757/2007 Wardhaman Urban Cooperative Bank Vs. The Central Board of Direct Tax and others. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's order Judge's orders and Registrar's order ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Coram : A.P. Lavande And P.D. Kode, JJ. Dated : 18th March 2009. Ms. Ahuja, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Dewani, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files pursis seeking discharge of Vakalatnama of Mr. Dewani. Notice has been duly given to the petitioner. Hence, Advocate Dewani stands discharged. Mr. Sunil Manohar, Advocate submits that he is appearing on behalf of the petitioner. This petition was filed by the petitioner challenging Search proceedings under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act. Mr. Manohar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners states that the proceedings under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act are over. This position has not been disputed by Mr. Parchure, learned counsel for the respondents. 2 Mr. Manohar, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to the petitioner to urge grounds before Assessing Authority or any other appropriate authority. The petition is accordingly allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to urge whatever grounds available in law before appropriate authorities at appropriate time. JUDGE JUDGE Ambulkar.