1 S.B.Cr.Misc. 2nd Bail App. No.454/2008 (Pradeep Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : March 04, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Pradeep Shah, for the petitioners. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he does not want to press the bail application filed by petitioners No.1 Pradeep Kumar and No.2 Deepak. The bail application filed by petitioners No.1 Pradeep Kumar and No.2 Deepak under section 439 Cr.P.C. is, therefore, dismissed as not pressed. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned as well as the challan papers. I have carefully gone through the statements of PW.1 Jabbar Singh and PW.2 Jeeva Ram. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that so far as petitioner No.3 Ajmeri alias Ajmer Ali is concerned, no role has been assigned to him and he has not been identified by any of the eye-witnesses in the test identification parade. 2 According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, there is no evidence against petitioner No.3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that none of the witnesses, so far examined, has identified the petitioner No.3, taking into account the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge accused petitioner No.3. on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed by petitioner No.3 Ajmeri alias Ajmer Ali s/o Ali Hasan under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that he be released on bail in FIR No.134/2007, P.S. Sanchore provided he furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-