IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.PADMANABHAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 10TH MARCH 2008 / 20TH PHALGUNA 1929 MACA.No. 2116 of 2007() ----------------------- (AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN O.P.(M.V.) No.351/2001 of MACT, PALAKKAD) APPELLANT/PETITIONER ------------- K.RADHAKRISHNAN, S/O.KUNJU, PAMKULAMBU HOUSE, ELANADU P.O. THRISSUR DIST. BY ADV. SRI.LIJU. M.P RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS ------------------------ 1. K.SUDEVAN, S/O.KRISHNANKUTTY, PUTHAN HOUSE, THIRUVADY, THEKKEPOTTA, PUDUKKODE, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DIST. 2. M/S.UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD., BRANCH OFFICE, I.G.TOWERS, NEAR BUS STAND, NEMMARA, PALAKKAD. BY THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------- M.A.C.A.No.2116 of 2007 ------------------------------- Dated this the 10th March, 2008. J U D G M E N T Appellant met with a motor vehicle accident. He was awarded an amount of Rs.29,900/= as compensation. According to the appellant, the compensation awarded is meager. The wound certificate shows that the appellant sustained fracture to 5th metatarsal bone and tarsal bone of the left foot, in addition to some fleshy injuries. Considering the nature of injuries, it is not possible to hold that the compensation awarded is too meager. So, I do not find any reason to admit this appeal. The appeal is only to be dismissed. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, JUDGE nj.