IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13067 of 2007 MAMTA DEVI daughter of Surendra Sah resident of Mohalla Bhatta Bazar P.S. K.Hatt, P.O. & District Purnea. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Commissioner-cum- Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar,Patna 2.The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Human ?Resources Development Department,Government of Bihar,Patna 3.The Distict Magistrate,Purnea. 4.The Deputy Development Commissioner,Purnia. 5.The District Superintendent of Education,Purnea. 6.The District Education Officer,Purnia. 7.Block Education Extension Officer,Purnia. 8.The Block Development Officer,K.Hatt,Purnia. 9.The Bihar School Examination Board through its Secretary, Patna 10.The Secretary,Bihar School Examination Board,Patna. ----------- 5 20.1.2009. Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. This application has been filed by the petitioner for a direction to the respondents to appoint her on the post of Prakhand teacher,K.Nagar Block, Purnia. Petitioner’s case is that her name is at Sl.no.54 in the merit list prepared for appointment of teachers. Total number of vacancies in the general and reserved category are 85. She has alleged that ignoring her candidates having lesser marks have been appointed. I.A.No.5322 of 2008 has also been filed by the petitioner, in paragraph 5 it has been stated that the petitioner belongs to extremely backward class. As per the roster, eight post of prakhand teacher were sanctioned for extremely backward class. It has also been stated that seven posts have been filled up by extremely backward class ladies and one post is still vacant. In paragraph 6 it has been stated that six posts have been filled up by these candidates who have obtained less marks than the petitioner. 2 Considering this specific statement by the petitioner it is desirable that in case the petitioner files representation before the Superindent of Education, Purnia within four weeks from today her representation be considered and if it is found that the allegations made by the petitioner regarding appointment of persons having lesser marks against the reserved post of extremely backward class is correct and petitioner’s name is in the merit list, consideration be made for her appointment. Final order be passed on petitioner’s represent within four weeks from the date of filing her representation. With the aforesaid observations/direction this application is disposed of. Sss/- (Mridula Mishra, J)