IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP NO. 21749 OF 2008 DATE OF DECISION: 14.1.2009 Gurcharan Pal Singh Brar ...Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab & Others …Respondents CORAM HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI PRESENT: Mr.G.S.Bal, Advocate for the petitioner Permod Kohli, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. On the asking of this Court, Mr.B.S.Chahal, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents-State. With the consent of the counsel, this petition is disposed of at motion stage. The short grievance of the petitioner is that his junior, namely, Sh. Ramesh Singh is drawing more pay than the petitioner. The petitioner has served a legal notice (Annexure P-10). But the same has not been decided. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if the respondents are directed to consider the legal notice and take a decision thereon. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to take a decision on the legal notice (Annexure P-10) within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order CWP NO. 21749 OF 2008 :2: is furnished to respondent no.2. Needless to say, in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, it should be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 14.1.2009 MFK