IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 301 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 21st February, 2011. Wariyam Singh Petitioner through Mr. Aashish Aggarwal, Advocate Versus Shiromani Gurudwara Prabandakh Committee & Anr. Respondents through Mr. Sukhbir Singh, Advocate Mr. Ajaib Singh, Advocate, for respondent No. 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner appears to have been dismissed from service pursuant to the disciplinary action based upon the charge- sheet dated 27.10.2008 [Annexure P-5] alleging that while he was the In-charge Pathi of the Gurudwara, the petitioner developed illicit relations with a woman. The petitioner denied those allegations and has contended that no proper and fair inquiry procedure has been followed by respondent No. 1 before punishing him. It is alleged that even dismissal order has not been supplied to the petitioner. Learned counsel for respondent No. 1 – SGPC refutes the petitioner's contention, nevertheless agrees to hand-over a copy of the dismissal order within two weeks. On receipt of the dismissal order, the petitioner shall be at liberty to submit a departmental appeal before the Executive Committee of the S.G.P.C. who shall decide the same in accordance with law and by following the principles of natural justice, preferably after giving an opportunity of personal hearing to him, as early as possible but not later than six months from the date of submission of the appeal. In case the petitioner files the appeal within one month from the date of supply of a copy of dismissal order, the plea of limitation shall also not be taken against him. Disposed of. Dasti. February 21, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE