IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS MONDAY, THE 11TH OCTOBER 2010 / 19TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 22815 of 2008(S) -------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 10/07/2008 IN IA 1273 & 1293/08 IN OS.832/2007 of FAMILY COURT, MALAPPURAM .................... PETITIONER: --------------- IYYATHUMMA, D/O.CHITTEPURATH MUHAMMED HAJI, R/AT.EDASSERY DESOM, KURUMBATHOOR AMSOM, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM BY ADV. SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON SRI.JIBU P THOMAS SRI.P.S.APPU RESPONDENT: --------------- KUNJI MUHAMMED HAJI, S/O.PUTHUVALPAR- AMBIL, SAIDALI, R/AT.EDASSERY DESOM KURUMBATHOOR AMSOM, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM ADV. SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/10/2010, ALONG WITH WPC 15942 OF 2009 & MA 545 OF 2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R. BASANT & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).Nos. 22815 of 2008, 15942 of 2009 & Mat.A.No. 545 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 11th day of October, 2010 JUDGMENT Basant, J. W.P.(C).Nos. 22815 of 2008 & 15942 of 2009 The learned counsel for the petitioner in these Writ Petitions submits that the disputes between the spouses have been settled as per an agreement dt. 18.5.2010. In these circumstances these Writ Petitions can now be dismissed as unnecessary, submits the counsel. We accept the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner/wife. 2. These Writ Petitions are accordingly dismissed as not pressed. Mat.A.No. 545 of 2008 3. This appeal is preferred by the appellant/husband. The respondent/wife contends that the matter has been settled W.P.(C).No. 22815/08 & connected cases 2 between the parties as per the above said agreement dt.18.5.2010. The learned counsel for the appellant was requested to take instruction as to whether the appellant now wants to prosecute this appeal in the light of the settlement dt.18.5.2010. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the counsel has no instruction. Learned counsel for the respondent/wife submits that the matter has been settled and that is why the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. A copy of the agreement dt.18.5.2010 has been placed before us for our perusal. We are satisfied that the appeal can now be dismissed as unnecessary. 4. Mat.A.No.545 of 2008 is hence dismissed. (R.BASANT) Judge (M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS) Judge tm