IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33371 of 2008 ARVIND SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR - - - - 2. 3.9.2008 Heard. The prayer for bail of the petitioner has been dismissed by an Officer in the rank of Additional Sessions Judge who was also acting as In-charge Sessions Judge of the Sessions Division, Jehanabad, in a case under Sections 363 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. If the learned Judge could have consulted the Cr.P.C. and its Schedule it could have appeared to him that the offence has been listed under the heading “bailable”. I could point out to the learned Judge for his information and guidance that when the police has registered a case under bailable offence, the attempt to go beyond that and dismiss the legitimate prayer for bail was not proper. Besides, the learned Judge ought to have considered other attending materials before deciding to dismiss the prayer. Let the above named petitioner be directed to be released from custody on his 2 furnishing a bond of Rs. 2,000/-( two thousand) with one surety of the like amount leach to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, in Hulasganj P.S.Case No.23 of 2008. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)