-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 86 OF 2005 Narayan Tukaram Bhoir ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. S.G. Surana for the petitioners. Mr. C.R. Sonawane, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondents. CORAM: DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J. & S.A. BOBDE, J. DATE: MARCH 04, 2005. P.C. The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to quash and set aside the impugned orders dated 9th August, 1991, 8th October, 1991, 5th September, 1991, 3rd October, 1991 and 2nd September, 1991 passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Metro Centre No.2, Uran, Dist. Raigad. 2. The petitioner's application for enhanced compensation has been dismissed by respondent No.3, without giving any reasons. In the impugned orders, respondent No.3 has mentioned that notification -2- under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was different. 3. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. In the facts and circumstances, the impugned orders are quashed and set aside. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner undertakes to file a fresh application before the Special Land Acquisition Officer within two weeks from today giving all details of the lands which are covered by Section 4 Notification. On petitioner filing a proper application, the same shall be decided by the Special Land Acquisition Officer by a reasoned order within four months from the date of receipt of the application. No further directions are necessary. The petition is accordingly disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE, J.