. . ,. ^^^•^:i^S^^ J CTi ^ ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR ^ WMT PETITION N0. SS^3>OF2003 PETITIONER : Mnketan S/o Late Shri Kanhu Charan P&nigrahi, %ed about 47 / years, ooctyation - Peon posted at / Sub Treaswy Qffice SanapaU Distt. Mahasamund(C.G) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: (1) Stete of Otihaittisgarii lin-ou^i ttie Sea-etary Fmance Departmmt, D.K.S. Hiawan, Raipur (C.G.) (2) Under SeCTetary Fmance Dq)artme3it, Raipur (C.G.) ^St>< •\^ (3) CommlssioneT Treasuiy, Accountant & Penision Clihadtisgarh, Ralpur } \^€^) Distnct Treasuiy Qfi&OCT, /^^^^' ^hsamund, Distt. c-'^^y^^ Mahasamund(C.G.) /.••'^<v"^*y' ^ <^\^u^5>^ (5) Safed Lsi Ehm, Occt^ation^ - ^^.'^^..•^' P&on at Disfc Treasury offioe Mahsamund (C.G.) .^ WRIT PETITION U/A 226/227t)F THE CQNSITITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC—78 ^i^'^T'f^fi^ 14.11.03 '^. ^ ^.' -^S •^n-q^rq^ 'g^Fre, f^TRTy W.P.N0.3523/ aTT^T'q^^ (' Upon being raeQtlcmed Stei Awadh Tripathi, Shci Ranbir Siagh Ma^haa, Sovernnent Advocate for the state. Heard both the couns^l. By this owit petitio^i uncter Artiele 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the th®ordec dated 10.09,2003 iaetitione^ se^cs to challenge KAnnexure P-2) by which he ; was available in the house Accordlngly» the request o^ 30th June, 2001, and since at Sarapali^ However^ vid^ ^pite^ ^t^ff ^ w^ TfN^R' ^^f^v^T^l' the mattw is taken on Board^ eounsel for the petitJloner^ haa be«i transferred from S^raipali to Mahasamund by respondent No»2. Th®case o£ the peti|fcioner is that he is a IV Class CTaployee and working as peo|i in the Sub-'Treasury Office, Saraipali« In th®year 200JI» the petitioner was posted in the District Treasury O^fice^ Mahasamimd^ The petition^ flled a repres^itation for hia transf^: to Saraipali because, aft«: tfcje death of his father nobody to lookafter his aaother. the petitioner ^as aceeeded to and he yas transferred <|o Saraipali viae order dated then the petitioner was working the impugned oraer» the petitioner has again 1oeen transferred to Mahasamand LjBe^A^iEIl^l^M!!LJ:^^J^_^e_t:iti?ner wil1 bear his XI-HC—78 -3^1 -^i-raTCT^, -^I^TR:, f^n^y W.P.No.3523/ 3 c^T^ll^t^ ^m Scma •^- 37I^T^^(^i^^) T: ^(i ovn esipeases^ ^hereas the pc| request fos his transfer frdm Saralpali, The difficultles on which the petitioner ha Mahasamiind to Saraipali are Therefore^ the learned sybmits that the petitiorier .^Plfe'4h> ^PT^f "H fe^ TN^$K 2 »- '^^t1^w^r titioner has not raade any tought his transfer frora sttll existing, coxansel for the petition^^ may be allo^ed to make repres<mtation raising all l^is difficulties and grievances for which the learned Goiver4ment Advocate has no objection. Having heard the learn<|<S counsel for parties and having regard to the facts 4»d circumstances of the case^ the petitioner is allo^ed t<^ mak@ a detailed representation raising all his grievances ^o respondcnt No«2 within 15 days from today and in txirn i respond<ait No.2 shall decide the re^esentation within 3|) days froia the date of receipt of the sarae consldering all his grievances in an objective manner with a reasoned ordet< Till then^ th@ petitioner may not be relieved/ if alr^ady not relieved^ With the above observaUons and directions, th® petition stands disposed of| Coissequently, M.(W,)P.^0,3194/2003 and I.A.NO,! 0102/2003 also stand disposed of^ parties are entitled fjar certified copy of this ord«r« Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge