1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Second Appeal NO.171 of 2009. Gopala Sukaru Bambole & others. Vs. State of Maharashtra thr. Collector, Gadchiroli & others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri U. M. Aurangabadkar, Advocate for the for the appellant. Coram : A.H. Joshi, J. Dated : 26th June, 2009. 1. Heard learned Advocate Mr. U.M. Aurangabadkar for the appellant. 2. Perused the impugned Judgments and pleadings tendered for perusal by learned Advocate for the appellant. 3. The appellants/plaintiffs had sued for declaration that he was entitled for allotment of 0.80 Hectors of land based on provisional Lease deed, and sought declaration that orders passed by Revenue authorities were null and void and also for consequential relief as to injunction etc. 4. Whether final lease ought to have been granted for entire area for which provisional lease 2 was granted, is a matter to be governed by law vesting the executive powers. 5. It is not shown by appellant as to what vested right appellant had to claim as a matter of right or privilege lease for full land covered by provisional lease. 6. In absence of demonstrating any legal right, impugned judgments are not shown to be erroneous, and correctible solely on a substantial question of law. 7. It is seen that present appeal does not involve any substantial question of law, and is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE /Muley/