Ndm 1 wp.2299.09.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2299 OF 2009 ANZ International manufacturing Pvt. Ltd. and ors. ... PETITIONERS Vs. The State of Maharashtra and anr. ... RESPONDENTS -------------- Mr. Siddharth Karpe with Ashish Gaikwad i/b YKS Legal, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. A.S. Shitole, APP for State. -------------- CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATE : 23 rd September, 2009. P.C. 1 Heard learned counsel. 2 An alternate efficacious remedy of challenging the order rendered by the learned Magistrate regarding issuance of process by way of revision application is available. 3 The Apex Court in Sakiri Vasu vs. The State of Utter Pradesh and others (2008) 2 Supreme Court Cases 409 observed “it Ndm 2 wp.2299.09.sxw is true that alternative remedy is not an absolute bar to a writ petition, but it is equally well settled that if there is an alternative remedy the High Court should not ordinarily interfere” 4 In this view of legal position, it be may proper to relegate the petitioners to the alternative remedy. 5 The petition is dismissed with liberty to prefer alternative remedy as is permissible under the law. In the meanwhile, the learned Judicial Magistrate may not proceed with the criminal case for a period of four weeks. All questions are kept open. [ V.R. KINGAONKAR, J ]