•2007 IT] ESP< Ku. Chandrakanta Soni D/'( Shri Dhamnarayan Soni aged about 39 years, Assistant Teacher, Presently posted at Govt Primary Schooi Aran^ ng, fC.G.) : 1. ! of Chhattis^ h the Secretary, lent of School D.K.S. Bhawar*, Dist - Raipur (C.G.) 2. The District Education Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Officer, lock s., Uistnct - upur (C.(j.) Present: Shri C.R.Sahu, Advocate for tfae petitioner. y, respondents .1 to3. (Passed on 2m ofApriL 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the Stat&'respondents joistly submit that the fact and question of law involved ia the present writ petition are the same to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. ^, 3. 96}, which faas been disposed of vide order lated 03.04.2006. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondeute does not controvert the said submission. 2. In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of Ster) an decided by thi.s Court on 15-12-2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by fhe Secretary, Board of ;ondar;'' Education, Bhopa! and the prospeetus of Diploma in Education Examination, it was clarified that the nomenclature ofthe Basic Training Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has beec changed and renamed as Diploma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 {Gopesh Kiimar Verma vs. The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and another) (Supra). Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case ofYashwant Kumar Bharadwaj (Supia), subiect to verificatioa of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired D.Ed. Examiaation Certificate on her own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and farther whether she has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit I-.-,.:.