1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 124 OF 2008 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 124 OF 2008 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 124 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLN. NOS. 158 OF 2008 & 159 OF 2008 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. OF 2007 IN SUIT NO. 550 OF 2007 National Federation of the Blind, Maharashtra & Ors. ..Appellants Versus Kishor L.Gohil ..Respondent Mr. N.Y.Gupte, Advocate, for Mr. Mukesh Subramaniam,advocate for the appellants. Mr. A.A.Kumbhakoni,Advocate, for the respondent. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 12th February, 2008. DATE : 12th February, 2008. DATE : 12th February, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 2 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The Appeal is against the refusal to grant ad-interim relief. The Notice of Motion is still pending. During the vacation, this Court had passed an order on 28th December, 2007 refusing to intervene in the said order. At that time, this Court had made it clear that whatever decision will be taken by the requisitionists in the proposed meeting would be subject to further orders to be passed by this Court after the matter was heard by the regular Bench. The meeting has already been held. Taking into consideration the circumstances, in my opinion, it will be desirable that the Notice of Motion is heard on its merits after the reply is filed by the respondent. 3. Therefore, the Appeal stands disposed of with the following directions :- (i) The respondent shall file reply to the Notice of Motion within two weeks from this date and the trial Court shall hear and dispose of the Notice of Motion within four weeks thereafter. (ii) Pending the Notice of Motion, all the 3 decisions which may be taken in the meetings held or to be held shall be subject to the result of the said Notice of Motion. 4. As the Appeal itself is disposed of, both the Civil Applications stand disposed of. (J.H. BHATIA,J.) (J.H. BHATIA,J.) (J.H. BHATIA,J.)