IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4950 of 2011 Bindeshwari Prasad Versus The Bihar State Electricity Board & Ors. ----------- 05. 21.10.2011 Both sides present. The application has been listed under the heading ‘to be mentioned’ at the instance of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the second paragraph of the order dated 16.08.2011, by mistake, it has been incorporated as Rs. 60,375/- and Rs. 60,383/- in place of Rs. 6375/- and Rs. 6383/-. He submits that aforesaid mistake crept in the aforesaid order on account of the fact that necessary corrections were not carried out in paragraph 1 of the writ petition, although correction was made in the office copy thereof. It is further submitted that instalment amount was, however, rightly mentioned in paragraph 11 of the writ petition. It is, therefore, submitted that he may be permitted to make appropriate corrections in paragraph 1 of the writ petition. Mr. Nikesh Kumar, learned counsel for the Respondent- Board, in view of the submissions of the petitioner, does not object to such permission to be granted to the petitioner. Let appropriate corrections in paragraph 1 of the writ petition with regard to amount of instalment(s) be carried out in course of the day. Accordingly the order dated 16.08.2011 is modified to the effect that in second paragraph, in place of Rs.60,375/- and Rs. 60,383/-, it shall be read as Rs. 6375/- and Rs. 6383/- respectively. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )