^ <7 ^ •^^ HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS Contemnors .•.<'" ContemptCase No. 25 of 2007 1. Shri Santosh Charid Parakh S/o Shri Malchandji Parakh aged about 65 years, Advocate & Notary, Resident of Station Road, Balod, District Durg 2. Shri Sheo Narayan Sharma S/o Shri Lakhan Dhan Diwan, aged about 68 years, Advocate & Notary, Resident of Near Maszid, Balod, District Durg 3. Shri Sewak Ram Sonbarsa S/o Late Shri Brij Lal Sonbarsa aged about 57 years, Advocate & Notary, Resident of Behind jChurch, Mararpara, Balod, District Durg. 4. ShrimatiArvindar Kaur Sandhu w/o Shri Paramjit Singh, aged about 45 years, Advocate & Notary, Resident of Dalli-Rajhara, Tahsil Balod, District Durg i 5. Shri Jwala Prasad Dewangan S/o Shri Shyam Lal Dewangan, aged about 59 years, Advocate & Notary, Residentof Jawahar Para, Balod, District Durg 6. Shri Fattoochand Jain S/o Late Shri Gopichand Jain aged about 42 years, Advocate & Notary, Resident of Naya Para, Ward No. 5, Balod, District Durg. Versus I" . • • . • . 1. Shri Inderchand Rakecha S/o Shri Baluram Rakecha, aged about 45 years, Advocate, Resident of Dalli Road, Tahsil Balod, DistrictDurg 2. Shri RamKishore Sahu S/Ck6hri Sant Ram Sahu, aged about ®"years, Advocate & President of Tqhsil Bar Association, Balod, Distriet Durg 3. Shri'Lakshya Kumar Kalihari S/oShri Gyan D.as Kalihari, aged about 38 years, Advocate & Secretary of Tahsil BarAssociation, Balod, DistrictDurg 4. Shri Dhannu Lal Sao S/o Shri Ajit Ram Sao, aged about 64 years, Advocate R/o Lohara Road, Balod, District Durg 5. Shri Ram Awatar Sharma S/o Shri Radhey Shyam Sharma, aged about 62 years, Advocate R/o Lohara Road, Balod, District Durg Contemut Case No. 25 of2007 6. Shri Kamal Upadhyaya S/o Shri Kishori Lal Upadhyaya, aged about 38 years, Advocate R/o Sindhi Colony, Balod, District Durg 7. Shri Kuffiar Singh Sahu S/o Shri Thanwar Singh Sahu, aged about 50 years, Advocate, Near Kharkhara Canal, Amapara, Balod, District Durg 8. Shri Ashok Kumar KashyapS/oShri Ram Singh Kashyap, aged about56 years, Advocate, R/o Near Kharkhara Canal, Amapara, Balod, District Durg 9. Shri Hira Singh Deshmukh S/o Bhaiya Ram Deshmukh, agedabout 42 years, Advocate, R/o Near Kharkhara Canal, Balod, District Durg 10. Shri Ashok Soni S/o'Shri Bhikham Chand Soni, aged about 50 years, Advocate, R/o Sadar Road, Balod, District Durg J 11. Shri Sunil Soni iS/o Shri Bhikham Chand Soni, aged about 36 years, Advocate, R/o Sadar Road, Balod, District Durg 12. Shri ImtigzKhan S/o Shri Firoz Khan, aged about 52 years, Advocate, R/o Balod, DistrictDurg 13. Shri Suraj Bhan Yadav S/o Shri Pyarelal Yadav, aged about 48 years, Advocate, R/o Shikaripara, Balod, DistrictDurg 14. Shri Sita Ram Gupta S/o Shri Sheo Kedar Gupta, aged abolit 55 years, Adv&cate, Resident of Jawaharpara, Balod, District Durg 15. Shri Jai Bharat Puri S/o Shri Jivrakhah Puri, aged about 45 years^Advocate, Resident of Gurur, Tah —Gurur, DistrictDurg 16. Shri Devendra Kumar Sahus/o Shri Bisheshar Sahu, aged about 42 years, Advocate, r/o Near Ganga S'agar Talab, Balod, District Durg 17. Shri Gulab Chand Jain s/o Late Bane Chand Chopda, aged about 60 years, Advocate, r/o Dalli-Rajhara Road, Bal6d, District Durg 18. Shri Bharat Soribarsa s/o Shri A.R. Sahu, aged about 38 years, Advocate, r/o Nayapara, Ward No.4, Balod, District Durg <7^ Contemot Case No. 25 of2007 \^ 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. Shri Devesh Kumar Thakur (Nai), s/o Shri Jagdeo Singh, Advocate, aged about40 years, r/o Mairi road Doundi Lohara, District Durg Shri Adil Siddiqui s/o Shri Hamid Siddiqui aged about 43 years, Advocate, Musalman Para, Balod, District Durg Shri Rajendra Prasad Diwan s/o Not known to the petitioners, aged about 40 years, Advocate, Deori, Tahsi] Doundi Lohara, DistrictDurg Shrimati Meena Awasthi w/o Shri Ram Kumar Awasthi, Advocate, aged about 50 years, r/o Daundi Lohara Road, Balod, District Durg Ku. Anita Shivhare d/o Not known to the petitioners, Advocate, aged about 35 years, r/o Doundi, Tahsil Balod, District Durg i Shri Danmal Jain s/o Late Shri Gapichand Jain, aged about 34 years, Advocate, r/o Nayapara, Ward No.5, Balod, District Durg Shri Israil Shah s/o Not known to the petitioners, aged about 36 years, Advocate, r/o NearJivan Bima Office, Dalli-Rajhara, Tahsil Balod, District Durg Shri Rupesh Kumar Kashyap s/o Shri AshokKumar Kashyap, aged about 30 years, Advocate, Near Kharkhara Canal, Amapara, Balod, DistrictDurg Shri Shriniwas Pandey s/oNot known to the petitioner, aged abput 38years, Advocate, r/ovillage Kolihamar, Tahsil Gurur, DistrictDurg ^^-'~ Shri Tomanlal Sonwahi s/o-'Nofknovi/n to the petitioner, agedabout^8 years, Advocate, r/oNear Bus Stand, Balod, District Durg Shp Dularwaran Gajendra s/o Not known to the petitioner, aged about 39 ye^rs, Advocate, r/o Near Saraswati Sishumandir, Ganjpara, Balod, District Durg, Smt. Manorama Deshmukh w/o Not known to the petitioner, aged about 40 years, Adyocate, r/o Shiksiripara, Balod, District Durg Shri Visheswar Sahu s/o Late Balram Sahu, aged about 55 years, Advocate, 1., ^ Contempt Case No. 25 of2007 r/o village Khapri (Malighori), P.S. Balod, Tahsil DoudiLohara, District Durg 32. Shri Hridayram Sahus/o Not known to the petitioner, aged about 55 years, Advocate, r/o village Mujgahan, P.S. Balod, Tahsil Doundi Lohara, District Durg CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE215 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOF INDIA Appearance : Ms. Sunita, Advocate for petitioner No.1. Mr. Pawan Kesharwani, Advocate for respondents 2 to 23, 26, 28 & 30 to 32. Mr. B.P. Singh, Advocate for respondents 24,25,27 & 29. ORAL ORDER (11.01.2010) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. I They are heard on I.A. No. 2/2008 an application filed by Prateek Sharma, Advocate and his associates including Ms. Sunita Jain, Advocate for withdrawal of their power on behalfofpetitionerNd.1. By allowing I.A. No. 2/2008, Mr. Prateek Sharma and his associates including Ms. Sunita Jain is permitted to withdraw the power on behalf of petitioner No.1. There is no representation on behalfbf the other petitioners to prosecute this contempt petition. Since there is no representation on behalf of the oth6r petitioners, this Court is left with no other way except to dismiss the contempt petition for want of prosecution. Accordingly, Contempt Case No. 25/2007 is dismisseg.J'pr want of prosecution. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge 'v- vatti