IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.57106 of 2007 DHANNU @ DHANANJY KUMAR @ DHANANJY KUMAR SHUKLA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 2.5.2008. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under Section 387 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the informant owns the rice shop and is neighbour of the petitioner. It is alleged that the petitioner demanded Rs.50,000/-as a ‘Rangdari’ from the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for about six months and that he has a clean criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that the petitioner is a Sales Representative and sells mustard oil. On behalf of the petitioner it has been said that due to local politics between the two as they are neighbours, a false case has been instituted against the petitioner. Be that as it may, the petitioner Dhannu @ Dhananjy Kumar @ Dhananjy Kumar Shukla is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Kotwali P. S. Case No. 183 of 2006 corresponding to G.R.No.1936 of 2006 with the condition that one of the bailors should be a closed relative of the petitioner. U.K. (Sheema Ali Khan,J) - 2 -