THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO CRL.P.NO.10180 OF 2009 ORDER:- The petition is filed by the petitioner/accused seeking to quash the order dated 20-10-2009 of the Principal District Judge, Warangal in Crl.R.P.No.17 of 2009. Initially, the case was instituted for enforcement of the liability under the cheque said to have been issued by the petitioner herein. After the trial was over, an application being Crl.M.P.No.765 of 2009 was filed by the petitioner/accused herein under Section 45 of Indian Evidence Act to send the disputed cheque to the expert and the said application was allowed by the lower court and as against that the revision was preferred by the complainant/respondent herein, vide Crl.R.P.17 of 2009, to the Sessions Judge, Warangal and the same was allowed. Aggrieved by the said order, the present application is filed to quash the said order. Now the point that arises for consideration is:- Whether the order of the learned District Judge is legal and sustainable? POINT:- There is no dispute about the fact that the trial of the case has been stopped at the stage of defence evidence. Since sending of a document to an expert is as good as examining of a witness on behalf of the petitioner/accused, in stead of sending the document to the expert, the accused is at liberty to get the document examined by any private expert in the court and he can be examined in the court. With the above observation the Criminal Petition is disposed of and the trial court is directed to dispose of the case within three months. _______________________ N.R.L. NĀGESWARA RĀO,J 28-12-2011 TSNR