1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.38 OF 2009. Shri Ganpat Wishvambhar Ambilwade ..vs.. Shri Niranjankumar Kisanlal Goenka and others. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- C ORAM : C.L.PANGARKAR, J. DATED : 14th December, 2009. Heard petitioner in-person. Respondent nos.1 and 2 are represented by Shri Lohiya Advocate and respondent no.3 represented by Mr.Kankale, learned AGP. The petitioner does not dispute that his case has been forwarded to the office of the Accountant General and there are no deficiencies in the proposal sent to the Accountant General for sanction of the pension. The petitioner is claiming arrears of the Sixth Pay Commission. The Sixth Pay Commission arrears are to be paid in five instalments, one such instalment has already been paid. Rest of the instalments would be paid by the respondents as and when the Government directs those instalments to be 2 paid. The petitioner is claiming interest on the amount of pension. The interest on the pension can be paid as per the Government Resolution dated 24 th April, 1995 only when there is a default on the part of the administrative machinery. The delay has not occurred on account of the default on the part of the administrative machinery but because the matter went in court with regard to the validity of the notice of voluntary retirement. In the circumstances, I find that all parts with respect to which the order was passed by the court have been complied. Nothing, therefore, survives in the petition. As and when the petitioner may have grievance with regard to the non-payment of the arrears of Sixth Pay Commission, he may approach the court once again. The petition, therefore, stands disposed of. JUDGE. chute 3