R.S.A No. 3869 of 2008 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A No. 3869 of 2008 Date of decision : August 13, 2009 Ghisa Ram and others, ...... Appellant (s) v. Ranjeet Singh @ Ran Singh and another, ...... Respondent(s) *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Yashwinder Paul Singh, Advocate for the appellants. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) This appeal has been filed against concurrent judgments of the Courts below decreeing the suit of the plaintiff/respondents for permanent injunction. The following questions have been proposed :- “ I. Whether the suit of the plaintiffs-respondents is maintainable or not and liable to be dismissed ? II. Whether the findings of the learned Courts below on issues No.1 to 8 are correct and erroneous or not and are liable to be reversed ? III. Whether the Courts below have proceeded to grant R.S.A No. 3869 of 2008 ::2:: decree without bearing in mind that it is a discretionary relief which is unrealistic and unjustified in the present circumstances ? IV. Whether the impugned judgments and decrees are patently illegal, ultra-vires, void and without jurisdiction and are liable to be set aside ? V. Whether grave and manifest injustice has been caused to the appellants in the matter ?” It would be seen that questions No. II and III proposed are questions of fact. Counsel for the appellants has taken me through the findings recorded by both the Courts below but has not been able to persuade me that the findings recorded are either based on no evidence or are based on such misreading of evidence as would render the same perverse. Learned counsel for the appellants has not denied that assertions on questions No. I, IV and V arise only if questions No. II and III were to be decided in favour of the appellants. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. As the main appeal has since been disposed of, all the pending civil miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) August 13, 2009. JUDGE `kk'