1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 1951 OF 2009 Dattarao S/o Bhujangrao Sontakke Versus Madan S/o Pralhad Telang and others *** Mr. Santosh C. Bhosale, Advocate for the Applicant Absent. Mr. A. N. Gaddine, Advocate i/b Mr. V. D. Gunale, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. K. M. Suryawanshi, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. *** CORAM: K. U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED: 25th SEPTEMBER, 2009. 1. Heard. Grant of pre-arrest bail to the accused is subject of criticism. I have gone through the order under challenge recorded by learned Additional Sessions Judge dated 1st December, 2008. There is apparently no mistake by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in exercising the discretion in terms of section 438 Cr.P.C. The matter revolves to issuance of certificate and production thereof in the year 1998 for which the Head Master has initiated action, after his retirement. Nothing is demonstrated 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. that custodial interrogation itself will be the answer to the queries posed by the complainant. Consequently, no merit. Criminal application rejected. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:25/09/2009. ans/1951