\W-l ® $lngie Bench \ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S) NO. Shri Ram Dhruv, Aged about 55 years, S/o Shri Mahetar Dhruv, Off1ce Sub Divisional Officer, Gangman, Sub Division No.6, Water Resource Department, Baloda Bazar, Raipur—(C.G. Khedu Ram Dhruv Aged about 50 years S/o Shrl Dhelu Ram Gangman O/o Sub D1v1s1on Office, Water Resource Department No.6, Baloda Bazar. Kartlk Ram, Aged about 55 years S/o Shrl Khru Chandrakar Gangman O/o Sub Division Office, Water Resource Department No.6, Baloda Bazar. Jhadu Ram Aged about 50 years S/o Shr1 Jantu Ram Verma, O/o Sub D1v1s10n Office, Water Resource Department No 6 Baloda Bazar Shyarn Lal, Aged about 49 years, S/o Shri Gend Ram Yadav, O/o Sub Division Office, Water Resource Department No.6, Baloda Bazar. ’l‘ukeshwar, Aged about 49 years, S/o Khorbahra KanOJe O/o Sub Division Office, Water Resource Department No.6, Baloda Bazar. Ganesh Ram Sahu‘,‘Aged about 48 years, S/o Shri Tuka Ram, O/o Sub Divisional Office, Water Resource Department No.6, Baloda Bazar. Jageshar, Aged about 47 years, S/o Shri Bhakala, O/o Sub Divisional Office, Water Resource Department No6, Baloda Bazar. Babu Ram, Aged about 52 years, S/o Shri Rajau Kevat, O/o Sub Divisional Office, Water Resource Department No.6, Baloda Bazar. 10. ,v-w'Jageshwar Satnami, Aged about 55 years, S/o Shri Pardeshi, O/o Sub Divisional Office, Water Resource Department No.6, Baloda Bazar.” §o\é ' / 2010 zlfv / / w gigv/r» PETITIONERS ) . 1; . K“ (:22, ' Sub Divisional Off1ce, Water Resource Depafjtment No.6, Baloda Bazar. 5;“ Mani Ram Dhriuv, Aged about 54 years, S/o Shri Raja Ram, 0/0 Sub Divisional ' Office, Water Resource, Department No.§, Baloda Bazar. A’MVW-Prem Manikpurii, Agcd about 49 .years, S/o Shri Sonsai, O/o Sub Divisional Off1ce, Water Resource Department No.6, Baloda Bazar. 1g/BBdhi Ram Sahu, Aged abogt so years, S/o Shri Jodhi Ram, o/o sub Divisional Office, Water Resource Department No.6, Baloda Bazar. , S/o Shri Bisnath Kanoje, O/o Sub, Divisional Office, Water Resource Department No.6, Baloda Bazar. ’LQK Ledga Ram Yadav, Aged about 60 years, S/o Shri Chait Ram, O/o Sub Divisional Officer, Wate‘r Resource Department No.6, Baloda Bazar. 20. 21. (.33 Shyam, Aged about 50 years, S/o Shri Jahbal Satnami, ,O/o Sub Divisional Office, Water Resource Department No.i‘6, Baloda Bazar x ,1» Jaiphal Satnaxf‘li, Aged about 55 years, S/o Shri‘ Roop Chand, O/o years, VS/o Rania Manikpuri, O/o Sub Divisional Office, Water Resource Department No.6, Baloda Bazar. ’l‘STW/Shyam Lal Sahu, Aged about 49 years, S/o Shri Kejau Sahu, O/o Sub Divisional Office, Water Resource Department No.6, Baloda Bazar». ‘ /Mani Ram Yadav, Aged about 49 . ‘Bhoklu Ram, Aged about 56 years, wu‘ ,, Bhaiya Ram, Aged about 5O years, S/o Shri SiyaRam Dhruv, O/o Sub Divisional Officer, Water Resource Department No.6, Baloda Bazar. Azava Ram, Aged about 56 years, S/o Shri Indman Knaoje 0/0 Sub Divisional Officer, Water Resource Department No.6, Baloda Bazar. . y 1 ® 2}/Markhapdey Sahu, Aged aboht 55 years, SVo ShriRamadhin, O/o Sub Divisiona;l Office; Water Resource Departmient No.6, Baloda Bazar. years, S40 Shri Sukh Deo, O/o Sub Divisional Officer, Water Resource Department No.6, Baloda Bazar. ‘ 24. ywotamg Chandrakar, Aged about 48 years, S/o Late Sonu, O/o Sub Divisional Officer, Water Resource Department No.6, Baloda, Bazar. 2 f’Mohit Verma, Aged about 5O years, S/o Shri Udiall, O/o Sub Divisional Officer, Water Resource Department No.6, Baloda Bazar 2(3/@rotam1‘ Verma, Aged about 49' 2 Jageshwar Dhemar, Aged about 48 ' years, S/o Shri Raja Ram, O/o Sub Divisional Officer, Water Resource Department No.6, Baloda Bazar WSamaru ”Kanoje Aged about 50 years, S/o Shri , O/o Sub Divisional Officer, Water Resource Department No.6, Baloda Bazar Wwasu Ram, Aged about 56 years, S/o Shri Dukalu chandrakar, O/o Sub Divisional Officer, Water Resource Department No.6, Baloda Bazar ' 29/) Sukhi Ram, Aged about 52 years, S/o Shri Milan Ravat, O/o Sub Divisional Officer, Water Resource Department No.6, Baloda Bazar $104 .‘‘.... Tezi Lal, Aged about 62 years, S/o Shri Heera Lal, O/o Sub Divisional Officer, Water Resource Department No.6, Baloda Bazar ’ SILV/"Bhagi Rathi Dhemar, Aged about 48 years, S/o Shri Milau, O/o Sub Divisional Officer, Water Resource Department No.6, Baloda Bazar VERs‘Us : State of Chhattisgarh Through — Secretary, Water Resource Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Mantralaya, Rajpur-(O.G.-)" 1. ® Director Finafgce, Account an Pension, AnandlNagar, Raipur. Executive Engixieer, Water Resource Department, Division No.2, Baloda Bazar, Raipur. E Sub Divisionél Officer, Wate Resource Depafgtment, Sub Division No.6, Baloda Bgzar, Raipur-(C.G.) > WRIT PETITION ' UNDER ARTICLE 226 WRIT OF IN THE THE CONsTITUTION NATURE OF OF MANDAMUS, INDIA FOR PROHIBITION, ARESUANCE ORDER OF CERTIORARI A TO DO JUSTICE ETC. OR IN .THE ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR MATTER d ‘ r HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Di laker) Writ Petition (S) No. 5016 of 2010 PETITIONER Shri Ram Dhruv and others VERSUS i RESPONDENTS State of Chiiiattisgarh and others Shri Sunil Otwani counsel for ihe petitioners. 1‘ i Shri Pravin Das Dy. GA for the respondents/State. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOFINDIA ORDER (03.09.2010) tq At the outset counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permite to Withdraw this petition With liberty to make representation in terms of ordei% dated 30 6 2010 passed by this Court in Writ Petition (S) No 3412/2005 He’ t also prays for a direction to the respondent No 1 to deCide the representation made by the petitioner in accordance With IaW as expeditiously as posstble Counsel for the respondents/State submits that in accordance With la the petitioners are not entitled for the reliefs sought for in the present petitioni lit He however submits that the representation made by the petitioner would be t deCIded by the competent authority m accordance With law. l Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as Withdrawn With liberty as ” l it. ' ‘ «I ‘aforesaid lf the petitioners make representation detalllng their grievances the ”é‘ \‘W‘l / same is expected to be deCIded by the competent authority in accordance Withi ‘ law as early as pOSSIbIe l lt is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on th ‘ “‘f "merits of the case and the competent authority would be free in deCIding the c ; A representation of the petltioner on its own merits. Aw‘a Sdl- V v t i l l Pritinker Diwaker l Judge 5i. l ,,-i /