Civil Writ Petition No. 12541 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 12541 of 2009 Date of decision:- 15.7.2011 Man Singh ...Petitioner Versus Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Gurgaon and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Mr. Rajbir Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Duhan, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. RITU BAHRI J.(Oral) The workman was appointed for 89 days and w.e.f. 03.4.1995 till 15.6.1999 his service were continuous with notional breaks as per letters Ex.M-2 to M-14. The conclusion of the Labour Court is that the workman has not completed 240 days and therefore he was not entitled to reinstatement and back wages. He was appointed as Peon for 89 days. In view of the Supreme Court decision in Secretary, State of Karnataka and others versus Umadevi and others 2006 SCT 462, the daily wages workman neither can seek reinstatement in the service of respondents nor regularization with or without back wages. This view has been followed by this Court in Bharat Singh versus Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court-1, Gurgaon, Executive Engineer, P.W.D. (B&R), Nuh, District Mewat and Executive Engineer, Mechanical Division, P.W.D. (B&R), Gurgaon, C.W.P. No.9732 of 2008 and decided on 29.5.2008. No law to the contrary has been shown or cited Civil Writ Petition No. 12541 of 2009 -2- at the bar. In view of settled preposition of law, it is not proved that the service of workman were dispensed with wrongly and in an illegal manner. No ground is made out to interfere in the order dated 16.3.2009 (Annexure P-6) passed by respondent No.1. The writ petition is dismissed. July 15, 2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Vijay Asija JUDGE