HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.26747 of 2011 Date: 24.11.2011 Between: 1. V.Surender Reddy (died) 2. Vedire Raghu and five others. ..... Petitioner AND The Government of A.P., Reptd by the Secretary, Agricultural Market Committees, Hyderabad and Three others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri N.Vasudeva Reddy Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP for Agriculture Counsel for Respondent No.4: AGP for Land Acquisition The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is ﬁled for a Mandamus to direct the respondents to deposit the compensation amount to the credit of E.P.No.12 of 2009 in O.P.No.10 of 1989 on the ﬁle of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Suryapet. At the hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition, appearing for respondent No.4, on instructions, stated that on 15.11.2011, the respondents have deposited a sum of Rs.17,03,695/- payable to the petitioners in the said E.P., in terms of the judgment and decree, dated 28.07.2000, in A.S.No.1388 of 1996. Sri N.Vasudeva Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that according to his clients, the respondents are liable to deposit Rs.20,35,016/-. Ordinarily, this Court seldom entertains Writ Petitions raising disputes which are subject matters of Execution Petitions. However, as an exception to this general rule, this Court has been lenient in entertaining Writ Petitions, where the farmers’ complain of inaction of the State and its oﬃcers in honouring the judgments and decrees in land acquisition cases. Indeed, the purpose of the petitioners in ﬁling this Writ Petition is substantially served with the deposit of more than 90% of the amount claimed by them in the said E.P. Therefore, I do not ﬁnd any reason whatsoever for this Court to examine whether the calculation put forth by the petitioners is correct or whether the amount deposited by the respondents is correct. It is for the executing Court to resolve this dispute. Inasmuch as the respondents have deposited the above-mentioned sum, which according to them is the amount payable to the petitioners by them, no relief in this Writ Petition need be granted to the petitioners. If the petitioners feel dissatisﬁed with the amount deposited by the respondents, they shall be free to raise a dispute before the Court in which the Execution Petition is pending. Subject to the above observations, the Writ Petition is dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, W.P.M.P.No.33019 of 2011 ﬁled by the petitioners for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. _____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 24th November 2011 DR