HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 1710 OF 2010 Friday, the Eleventh day of June, Two Thousand and Ten Between Ballabh Vyas Petitioner AND Sri Gopi @ B.Goverdhannath and others Respondents THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 1710 OF 2010 ORAL ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 8.3.2010 passed in I.A. No. 98 of 2010 in R.C. No. 262 of 2008 whereby the learned IV Addl. Rent Controller, Hyderabad, has dismissed the application filed under Rule 7(5) of A.P. Rent Control Act, 1960 praying to receive certain documents by condoning the delay. The petitioner herein filed the above R.C. seeking eviction of the respondents. It is his case that along with the R.C. he filed Xerox copies of certain documents and sought to file the originals thereof with the present petition. The documents in original, which are sought to be filed are the Income Tax Returns from 1997-98 to 2003-2004 and 2008-2009 in respect of the petition schedule property, property tax for the year 2008, NIL encumbrance Certificate in respect of the petition schedule property and death certificate of the father of the petitioner dated 14.8.2006. The court below dismissed the petition observing that copies of any of the documents sought to be received under the said application were not filed by the petitioner at the time of filing the above R.C. It is further observed that no good reasons are shown by the petitioner for non- production of the documents earlier, which are now sought to be received. Aggrieved thereby, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. As observed by the court below, no ground clinching the issue in dispute in the suit is made out to receive the documents, therefore, he ought to have taken more care in filing the suit, instead of filing those documents at a belated stage. Having gone through the affidavit of the petitioner and the reasons recorded by the court below, I do not find any reason to differ from the finding arrived at by the trial court. On a perusal of the entire material available on record, I am of the considered view that no grounds are made out to interfere with the finding of the court below and I do not see any illegality or irregularity in the order impugned. Consequently, the Civil Revision Petition fails and is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ________________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari June 11, 2010 MAS