IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7713 of 2011 Mantu Ram Mantu S/o Rampukar Ram Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 04 05.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is husband of informant's daughter and as per prosecution case the marriage of petitioner was solemnized with informant's daughter. It is further alleged that on 11.04.2010, petitioner went at the house of informant and took his wife to his home but when informant went at the house of the petitioner on 13.04.2010, he found that petitioner as well as his wife were missing and after that informant lodged the case on 21.04.2010. Admittedly, the victim girl is still traceless and after completion of the investigation, police submitted charge-sheet for the offences under Section 498A and 365/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner has also filed a complaint case against the informant and others 2 for committing the murder of his wife. In course of investigation there are two sets of witnesses, the persons who are either family members of informant or his co-villager support the prosecution case whereas the co-villagers of the petitioner support the defence case. Moreover, some co-accused persons have already granted privilege of bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of this case as well as the submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, in connection with Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 106 of 2010. Safik (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)