1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER SB Cr Misc Bail Application No. 4195/2010 Dhanpal Versus The State of Rajasthan through PP 28.5.2010 HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Govind Chaudhary - for petitioner Mr Peeyush Kumar, PP – for the State BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that co- accused has been released on bail under section 439 CrPC. Thus petitioner may be granted benefit of anticipatory bail. On the other hand, learned PP has opposed the bail application moved by the petitioner. He submits that cases have been registered against the petitioner under the provisions of Rajasthan Excise Act and there is a bar for entertaining application for bail under section 438 CrPC therein. There exist previous cases 2 against the petitioner also. After taking into consideration rival submissions of learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, but looking to the facts of this case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Hence, the bail application is dismissed. (MN Bhandari), J. bnsharma