// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3285/2008 Pat Ram Rawat S/o Shri Umrao Singh Rawat Versus Hari Dayal Das Chela Shri Radhika Dass Ji Maharaj Date of Order ::: 23.07.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Suresh Dhanwal, Advocate, for Shri Praveen Balwada, Counsel for petitioner #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ petition, on behalf of the defendant, is directed against the impugned order dated 15th February, 2008 passed by the first appellate court, whereby his application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC for amendment in the written-statement, during the pendency of his appeal against the impugned decree passed by the trial court, has been rejected. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and also examined the reasons assigned by the first appellate court for rejecting the application and, after considering the same, I find that // 2 // the reasons assigned by the court below appear to be perfectly justified and the said order does not call for any interference by this Court. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//