..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1039 OF 2008 Madhav Chhabria. ..Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..Respondents. .... Mr.Shailesh Kantharia, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr.C.V.Golwala, Adv. for respondent No.2. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP, for State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 10th October, 2008. DATED : 10th October, 2008. DATED : 10th October, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant-orig.accused, the learned Advocate for respondent No.2-orig.complainant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking quashing of C.C. No.146/SW/2007 pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Mazgaon, Mumbai. The said case pertains to M.E.C.R. No.2 of 2008 of Nagpada police station. The said case is under Sections 406 & 420 of IPC. 3. The learned Advocate for respondent ..(2).. No.2-orig.complainant has stated that the complainant and the accused have amicably settled the dispute amongst themselves. In view of the settlement, the complainant has stated that the said case be quashed. 4. The complainant has also tendered his affidavit-in-reply to the above effect. In view of the said affidavit-in-reply, C.C.No.146/SW/2007 pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Mazgaon, Mumbai is quashed. 5. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)