1 CP-109-09.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 109 OF 2009 Shri Santosh V. Mestri & Ors. ... Petitioners vs. Municipal Commissioner for Gr.Mumbai & Ors. Respondents Ms. Pratibha Borade, i/b. M.S.Kumthekar,Advocates, for the petitioners Mr.M.M.Malvankar,Advocate for the respondent MCGM. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 24th September, 2010. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. On 25.4.2008, in a group of Writ Petitions, being Writ Petition Nos. 1772/2008 and others, this Court had permitted the petitioners to submit a fresh proposal within a period of three weeks for redevelopment of Koli Chawl and the Corporation was directed to process and consider that proposal within eight weeks from the date of receipt of the proposal. That was the interim order pending the Writ Petitions. 3. The petitioners have filed Contempt Petition contending that the Municipal Corporation has not acted upon that order. The learned Counsel for the Municipal Corporation points out that the proposal submitted by the petitioners 2 CP-109-09.sxw was not feasible as the petitioners could not be rehabilitated in redeveloped Koli Chawl. He has also pointed out that looking to the facts ad circumstances, the Writ Petition was finally disposed of directing the petitioners to vacate the premises in their occupation. Meanwhile the Corporation was also permitted to take possession from them. This fact is not denied by the learned Counsel for the petitioners. 4. In view of these developments, this Contempt Petition does not survive and stands dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)