IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. W.P. No.2453 of 2010 Date of Decision:23.12.2010 Lala .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Sidharth Sarup, D.A.G. Haryana. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) In pursuance to the order dated 14.12.2010, the report in the form of affidavit by Ajit Balajit Joshi, I.A.S., District Magistrate, Sonepat (Chairperson) of the Vigilance Committee under the Bonded labour (Abolition) Act, 1976 alongwith the report (Annexure R-1) of Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sonepat has been filed. As per the report (Annexure R-1) of Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sonepat, the petitioners were found at the brick kiln and their statements were recorded vide which it is submitted by them that they were not kept under detention and they were allowed to go any where for their day today needs. They are being paid wages as fixed by the Government. They came to this brick kiln at their own will and now they are leaving the brick kiln with their luggage for their villages. It is further submitted in the said report that no laborers were bounded at this brick kiln and all laborers came to work at their own will and left at their own. In view of the said report, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and is dismissed as such. 23.12.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE