IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6602 of 2010 1. DILIP KUMAR S/O KEDAR PASWAN R/O VILL GOVINDPUR, P.S.MANSOOR CHAK, DISTT-BEGUSARAI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR , THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR PRIMARY EDUCATION GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DISTERICT MAGISTRATE BEGUSARAI 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION BEGUSARAI 5. THE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER BEGUSARAI 6. THE REGIONAL EDUCATION OFFICER TEGHRA, DISTT- BEGUSARAI 7. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT BLOCK-MANSOORCHAK, DISTT-BEGUSARAI 8. THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER BLOCK MANSOORCHAK, DISTT-BEGUSARAI 9. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY PANCHAYAT GOVINDPUR, BLOCK MANSOORCHAK, DISTT-BEGUSARAI 10. THE MUKHIYA GRAM PANCHAYAT GOVINDPUR, BLOCK-MANSOORCHAK ----------- 2 24.9.2010 The petitioner had applied for the post of Prakhand teacher in respect of Mansoorchak Block, District – Begusarai .He had done two years vocational course conducted by the Bihar School Examination Board but his candidature was not accepted on the ground that vocational course is not equivalent to Intermediate. He has come to this court challenging the same in view of decision of this court holding otherwise . In my view, this court has held clearly that two years vocational course conducted by the Bihar School 2 Examination Board is equivalent to Intermediate. But the question remains whether the petitioner should be given a chance or not in view of the fact that the selection process was completed in the year 2007 and the petitioner has now come to this court. In the mean time others may have been appointed and it would not be fair or proper to displace them because they would not be at fault. However considering the fact that the petitioner was wrongly not considered, I direct the concerned Block Development Officer to consider the case of the petitioner if there is a vacancy available and if considering his qualification and academic achievement, he finds that he would have been selected in the year 2007 and there is vacancy presently available then notwithstanding any circular or directive of the government, he would give him employment, which would effective from the date when the same is done. If there is no vacancy, the petitioner would then have no claim. The Block Development Officer would consider the case of the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of production of a copy of this order. With these observations the writ application is disposed of. singh ( Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)