1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 513 OF 2010 Dr. K.R. Davies (MD) (General Medicine) Son of late Raphel K.R. Kuthur House, P.O. Eithuruth-68060 Thrissur, Kerala ..PETITIONER VERSUS Mr A.V. Johny, Authorised Officer, Federal Bank Trichur, Regional Office, Trichur & ors. ..RESPONDENTS Petitioner in person; Mr N.R. Shaikh, A.P.P. for respondent no.5 CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND A.V. POTDAR, JJ. (Date of reserving the order : 29.9.2010 Date of pronouncing the order : 4.10.2010) ORDER (PER P.V. HARDAS, J.) This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by which the petitioner prays for issuance of a writ for "getting of my lost documents which are important for me legally which lost at Bhusawal 2 Railway Station. Complaint dated 12.4.2010." The petitioner also prays for "analysis of the whole incidents and the steps may be taken to prevent such shameful incidents related with the Honourable President of India and the Honourable Supreme Court of India and also appropriate solution." The petitioner further prays that "the petitioner may be given Government accommodation at concessional rate because the petitioner is not having any job for the last many months." 2. We have heard the petitioner in person and the petitioner states that he is pressing for the two reliefs, i.e. in respect of location of the documents which were lost at the Bhusawal Railway Station and for giving him protection. 3. According to the petitioner, the petitioner had lost the documents at the Bhusawal Railway Station and had accordingly given his complaint which is annexed to the petition. The aforesaid complaint came to be received on 12.4.2010. The petitioner has made several averments in respect of certain orders which were passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Trichur and the Kerala High Court. He states that the Delhi High Court had granted him police protection after admitting his Writ Petition (Criminal) No.306 of 2010. 4. Affidavit in reply has been filed on behalf of Railway Police Station, Bhusawal. In the affidavit in reply it is stated that the report of the 3 petitioner about loss of documents was registered as Missing Case No. 28/2010 at Bhusawal Railway Station. It is stated that the deponent immediately issued a wireless message to all the Railway Police Stations within Manmad Sub-Division in respect of the complaint of the petitioner. The affidavit in reply further discloses that the deponent who is the Assistant Police Sub-Inspector of the Railway Station, Bhusawal inquired with the coolies, vendors, etc., but no one had seen the speed post receipt belonging to the petitioner which was alleged to be missing from the Bhusawal Railway Station. It is further stated that after lodging the report the petitioner never approached the Railway Station, Bhusawal. It is also stated that apart from the speed post receipt, which other documents are missing is also not disclosed. The petitioner had not given his detailed address in the complaint and, therefore, the Railway Police could not correspond with him. It is further stated that a report has been submitted to the Police Inspector with a request to close the file, which has been granted. 5. It appears that despite careful search, the missing documents belonging to the petitioner which he alleges were missing from the Bhusawal Railway Station have not been found. No fault can be found with the police officers as they have taken all the steps as are necessary in law to be taken for tracing the documents. In respect of the prayer of the petitioner for providing him protection, the petitioner may resort to the remedy available to the petitioner in law of submitting an application 4 to the Superintendent of Police requesting for providing police protection. The averments in the petition do not disclose any cause for immediately providing any police protection. 6. Since there is no merit in the petition, the petition is dismissed summarily with a direction to the Police Station, Bhusawal to return the documents to the petitioner in the event the aforesaid documents are traced. In the circumstances, there will be no order as to costs. (A.V. POTDAR, J.) ( P.V.HARDAS, J.) amj/criwp513.10