IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE. ORIGINAL SIDE. ORIGINAL SIDE. CUSTOMS APPLICATION NO. 23 OF 2002. CUSTOMS APPLICATION NO. 23 OF 2002. CUSTOMS APPLICATION NO. 23 OF 2002. Shri R.V. Desai with A.S. Rao for the applicant. WITH WITH WITH CUSTOMS APPLICATION NO. 25 OF 2002. CUSTOMS APPLICATION NO. 25 OF 2002. CUSTOMS APPLICATION NO. 25 OF 2002. Shri P.S. Jetly with A.S. Rao for the applicant. WITH WITH WITH CUSTOMS APPLICATION NO. 32 OF 2002 CUSTOMS APPLICATION NO. 32 OF 2002 CUSTOMS APPLICATION NO. 32 OF 2002 Shri R.V. Desai with A.S. Rao for the applicant. WITH WITH WITH CUSTOMS APPLICATION NO. 33 OF 2002. CUSTOMS APPLICATION NO. 33 OF 2002. CUSTOMS APPLICATION NO. 33 OF 2002. Shri P.S. Jetly with R.C. Master for the applicant. WITH CUSTOMS APPLICATION NO.37 od 2002. CUSTOMS APPLICATION NO.37 od 2002. CUSTOMS APPLICATION NO.37 od 2002. Shri R.V. Desai with A.S. Rao for the applicant. CORAM: V.C.DAGA & CORAM: V.C.DAGA & CORAM: V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 17-3-2005. DATED: 17-3-2005. DATED: 17-3-2005. P.C. 1. Heard rival parties. 2. Learned Counsel appearing for both the parties in all the above applications agree that the issue sought to be raised in these applications has already been answered by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Customs, Nhava Sheva vs. Commissioner of Customs, Nhava Sheva vs. Commissioner of Customs, Nhava Sheva vs. Marmo Classic reported in 2003 (156) ELT 14 (Bom.) Marmo Classic reported in 2003 (156) ELT 14 (Bom.) Marmo Classic reported in 2003 (156) ELT 14 (Bom.). In this view of the matter, all these applications are rejected in limine with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)