HIGijgaURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT EILASPUR WEE PETETlfJN LS} Na. 3893 at 200? PETI'HONER V‘ijay Kumar Pradhan S/‘o Shri Sounkhi La! Pradhan, Aged about—45 years, Assistant Teacher. Middie School. Jharmuda, Block-Pusour. District — Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. $tate of Chhattisgarh. Through : The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S, Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director, Public instruction. D.K.S. Bhewen, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The District Education Officer. Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 7L4 4. Block Education . Officer, Biock-Pusour. District Raigarh (0G) WRIT PETiTiON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFJNDIA Single Eench : Hon‘ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri Present: Shri Sanjay Patei, Advocate for the petitioner. Smti Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the respondents/State. ORDER (Passed on this 11f day of Ju!y,' 2907) ‘1. The question of Iaw invoived herein Is asto whether the petitioner is entitieo' to regular pay scale wet the date of initiai appointment or from the date of compietion of probation period. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the 1. x respondents/State jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in WP. (S) No. 5976/2006 (Su‘shtt Ttwart and others vs. state Government of Ghhattisgarh and others), which was aliowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. 3. in View of the above—stated submissions made by learned counsei appearing for the parties, the writ petition ls allowed in the same terms, subject to verification of the facts. No order as to costs. Sd/- ‘ I Satish K.Agnihotri Bi- Judge