IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34483 of 2010 1. Chunnu @ Chunnu Rai @ Chunchun Rai, 2. Munnu Rai, 3. Rajesh Rai, All are sons of Ram Jinish Rai, residents of village Amba Oujha Tola, P.S. Piprahi, District Sheohar…………….Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar…………………Opposite Party ----------- 2 22.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel for the State. The case is under Sections 323, 380 and 504 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 (X) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that after investigation, the police did not find the case true against the petitioners and submitted final form. However, on the complaint of the informant, the court below has taken cognizance against the petitioners. Since the case has not been found true by the police, this Court is of the view that anticipatory bail application of petitioners is maintainable. Considering the above facts and 2 circumstances, petitioners, namely, Chunnu @ Chunnu Rai @ Chunchun Rai, Munnu Rai and Rajesh Rai, are directed to surrender before the court of Sri Rakesh Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Sheohar at Sitamarhi in connection with Piprahi P.S. Case No.35 of 2010 (G.R. No.162 of 2010) and upon their so surrendering, the court below shall allow them bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to his satisfaction, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)