IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.19642 of 2008 Date of decision: February 3, 2009 Shiv Kumar Bahl ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & another ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. Deepak Balyan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J.(Oral) This writ petition has been filed challenging the action of the respondent for deducting an amount of Rs.71,311/- from the medical reimbursement of the petitioner. In reply, learned counsel for the respondents states that the petitioner has submitted a bill of Rs.1,72,991/- on account of having receiving treatment at Sir Ganga Ram Hospital at New Delhi. It has further been stated that as per instructions the charges at AIIMS/PGI rates + 75% of the balance cost of treatment has been reimbursed to the petitioner. No replication has been filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner controverting the same. I find that the action of the respondent is valid and in consonance with the instructions of the policy of the government. Consequently, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. February 03, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE