IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO. 996 OF APPEAL NO. 996 OF APPEAL NO. 996 OF 2002 2002 2002 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.P.S.Dani for the Appellants. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 14th March, 2008. : 14th March, 2008. : 14th March, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Both the Courts concurrently based on the material available on record held that the Appellants/Orig. Plaintiffs have no title to the suit property; the Plaintiffs are not in possession of the suit property; plaintiffs failed to prove the defendants obstructed the possession of the Plaintiffs in the suit and thereby rejected the ( 2 ) suit filed by the Appellant. Apart from this, it is a clear finding given by the Courts below that the suit is beyond limitation. Taking all this into account and as the land is belonging to the Government, Respondent No.1 and as there is no case made out and perversity pointed out, the present Second Appeal is therefore, dismissed. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]