IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20255 of 2009 HARE RAM SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 16-06-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been named in the last incident for demand of Rangdari followed by threatening, earlier also such demand is shown to be made which has been falsely made due to having grudge in the parties for negotiation of sale and purchase of informant’s old house for which part of the consideration money was also paid. otherwise there was no probability of making of demand of rangdari from the villager. Firing is also shown but that did not hit anybody and the petitioner remained in custody since 17.12.2008. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-1, Begusarai in Sessions Trial No. 176 of 2009, arising out of Naokothi P.S. Case No. 76 of 2008. ( Mandhata Singh, J ) BTiwary/ - 2 -