IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 3RD JUNE 2011 / 13TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 15003 of 2011(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- VIJANI VIJAYAN, D/O. VIJAYAN, AGED 28 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, STAR AGENCY, (DEALER, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD.), NH 17, THRIPRAYAR P.O., NATTIKA P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR. C.A.CHACKO RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, STATE OF KERALA, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. THE BHARATH PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS AREA MARKETING MANAGER OF KERALA, 1ST FLOOR, PETRONET, C.C.K.BUILDING, SEAPORT-AIR PORT ROAD, KOCHI-683 309. 4. ANOOP ASOKAN, KALLATTIL HOUSE, KACHERIPADY, THALIKULAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. R1 AND R2 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. P. N. SANTHOSH R3 BY ADV. MR. S. SUJIN, STANDING COUNSEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P (C) No. 15003 of 2011 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 3rd June , 2011 JUDGMENT The prayers in the writ petition are as noted below : i. issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, directing the 2nd respondent not to issue No Objection Certification to the 4th respondent to start new Petroleum Outlet in Survey No. 209/1B of Tthalikulam Village, Thrissur District, on the side of N.H. 17 in violation of Exts. P1 and P2. ii. issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, directing the 3rd respondent not to issue Dealership to the 4th respondent in violation of Exts. P1 & P2. and iii. issue such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of this case. 2. Exactly similar issue as involved in this case had come up for consideration before this Court in W.P.(C) 1016 of 2010 and connected cases, which was dealt in detail and all the writ petitions were dismissed as per the judgment dated 23.05.2011. In the said circumstances, this Writ Petition is also fails and it is dismissed in tune with the common judgment as aforesaid. P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE kmd