IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.629 of 2010 1. Rama Ranjan Prasad Singh S/O Late Muneshwar Prasad Singh R/O At & P.O- Ramna, P.S Mithanpura, Town And Distt- Muzaffarpur Versus 1. The Union Of India 2. Mr. S.K.Biswas, The Group General Manager, Indian Railway Catering And Tourism Corporation Limited, Eastern Zone, Office, 3, Koilaghat Street, Ground Floor, Kolkata-700001 3. Mr. Rajesh Rana The Regional Manager, Indian Railway Catering And Tourism Corporation Limited, 4th Floor Biscomaun Bhawan, West Gandhi Maidan, Patna 16 30.11.2011 The petitioner has filed the instant contempt application for willful disobedience of the order dated 7.9.2009 passed in C.W.J.C. No.9404 of 2009 heard analogous with C.W.J.C.No.10504 of 2009. The aforesaid order was modified by order dated 1.12.2009 passed in M.J.C. No.3364 of 2009 heard analogous with M.J.C. No.3365 of 2009. The petitioner submits that he was holding licence for running a trolley at Muzaffarpur Railway Station. The policy of the IRCTC is to gradually eliminate trolleys at ‘A’, ‘B’ and ‘C’ category stations and rehabilitate the trolley owners by first setting the stalls in their favour. This court disposed of the aforesaid writ petitions with an observation that the petitioner should raise his grievance before the Respondent no.3, the Group General Manager, Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd., Eastern Zone Office, 3, Kolkata. It was observed that if the petitioner files a representation before respondent no.3 within three weeks thereof, he would dispose of the representation preferably within further three weeks. It was further observed that till then the tender papers filed 2 by the aspirants will not be opened and considered, so far as it relates to stations where petitioners run their trolleys. A supplementary show cause has been filed on behalf of the IRCTC wherein in paragraph 6 it has been stated that as per New Catering Policy, 2010 which has came into effect from 21.7.2010, regulation of Catering Services has been again handed over to the Indian Railway and the responsibility of the IRCTC would now be limited to selling e-ticket and i-ticket. Counsel for the IRCTC submits that the petitioner may move the authorities of the Railway for redressal of his grievance in light of the New Catering Policy, 2010. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, if so advised, may file a fresh representation for redressal of his grievance before an appropriate authority of Indian Railway, who would dispose of the same expeditiously preferably within three weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this contempt petition stands disposed. This order is being passed in presence of counsel for the IRCTC. KHAN (S.P. Singh,J)