IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA LPA No.146 of 2011. Decided on 2.6.2011. Shyamanand Shandil ….Appellant. Versus State of H.P and others …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the appellant : Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. for the respondents No.1 to 3. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice (oral). The matter pertains to the transfer. All that the appellant-petitioner wants is to submit a representation before the second respondent pointing out the family circumstances seeking for accommodation either at Shimla or Solan. For that purpose, we do not think that the matter should be considered on appellate side, while dismissing the application for condonation of delay and consequently the appeal, it is made clear that in case the appellant- petitioner files an appropriate representation pointing out the grievances before the second respondent within a period of two weeks from today, the same shall be considered on adverting to the submissions made therein, within another two weeks. 2. The appeal is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice (V.K. Sharma) Judge. 2nd June, 2011. Lsp/cs