CRM-M No.28801 of 2011 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : December 13, 2011 1. CRM-M No.28801 of 2011 Sanjeev @ Sanju vs The State of Haryana and another, 2. CRM-M No.31791 of 2011 Kulbir vs State of Haryana and another, *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. R.K.Malik, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M No.28801 of 2011. Mr. Vikas Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M No.31791 of 2011. Mr.Manmohan Sikka, DAG Haryana Mr. J.P.Dhull, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) The petitioners seek grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.148, dated 31.10.2009, registered under Sections 365, 376, 511, 506 of the IPC, at Police Station Kalayat, District Kaithal. Counsel for the petitioners have argued that the petitioners were originally found innocent and have now been summoned under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C. As per them, the antecedents of the complainant/respondent No.2 and his previous admitted conduct though CRM-M No.28801 of 2011 ::2:: may not be enough to entitle him to challenge the summoning order, yet would definitely entitle the petitioners to the protection from arrest. Both counsel for the State of Haryana, as also counsel for respondent No.2 are not in a position to controvert the above argument. In this view of the matter, I deem it appropriate to confirm the order dated 27.9.2011 passed in CRM-M No.28801 of 2011 and dated 19.10.2011 passed in CRM-M No.31791 of 2011. Ordered accordingly. Petitions stand disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) December 13, 2011. JUDGE `kk'