IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 24.08.2011 1. CWP No. 8866 of 2011 Imanbir Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ..Respondents. 2. CWP No. 5303 of 2011 Daljeet Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ..Respondents. 3. CWP No. 953 of 2011 Prince Bajaj and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ..Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present : Mr. B.S.Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioners in CWP No. 8866 of 2011 and Mr. G.S.Chahal, Advocate, for the petitioner in CWP No. 5303 of 2011. Mr. S.S.Sodhi, Advocate, for the petitioners in CWP No. 953 of 2011. Ms. Kavita Arora, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. **** CWP No. 8866 of 2011 [2] SURYA KANT .J.(Oral) This order shall dispose of all these petitions as common questions of law and facts are involved therein. The petitioners in short seek a mandamus to the Punjab Public Service Commission to follow the pattern of formula of 'scaling' as adopted by the Union Public Service Commission. The issue in my considered opinion essentially falls within the domain of the subject experts/expert body. There is a little scope of judicial review in such like matters. The recommendations said to have been made by some subject experts is undoubtedly a relevant material to be considered by the Constitutional Body and other stake holders who are to lay down such like policy decisions. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction that the contentions raised by the petitioners as also the material relied upon by them shall be considered by the Punjab Public Service Commission objectively, if so required, with the aid and advice of other subject experts to enable it to take an appropriate policy decision with an abound object to select the best merited persons. It would be appreciated if the decision is taken within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Dasti. (SURYA KANT) 24.08.2011 JUDGE 'ravinder'