IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 9235 of 1999 Between: R.K.Arjun, S/o Late R.V.Karunakar, University of Hyderabad, R/o Ho.no.101, Vansavi Nagar, Secunderabad-15. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Vice-Chancellor, Unversity of Hyderabad, P.O.Central University, Hyderabad-500 046. 2 The Chairman, Executive Council, P.O.Central University, Hyderabad-500 046. 3 The Secretary, University Grant Commission, Bahadurshah Suffer Marg, New Delhi-110 002. 4 Ministry of Human Resoruces Development, (Department of Education) Rep.by its Director (University), Sastry Bhavan, New Delhi .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue writ, order or direction more in the nature of writ of mandamus and declare that petitioner entitled to be continued in service till attainment of 62 years of age as per clarification issued by 4 th Respondent in Letter No.F.11/97-0.1 dt.6/11/98 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.HARI HARAN Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.V.RAJENDRA BABU The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO. 9235 OF 1999 ORDER: Since none appeared for the petitioner on 26.2.2008, the writ petition was directed to be posted “for dismissal”. Today though the writ petition is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, neither is the counsel for the petitioner present nor is there any representation on his behalf. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as costs. ___________ 19-3-2008 asp