1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Second Bail Application No. 9933/2010 Rohitash Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 11.11.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Sudhir Jain - for the petitioner Mr Laxman Meena, PP – for the State BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that twenty material witnesses have already been examined again and none has made allegations against petitioner. Main accused was earlier granted bail. Petitioner is behind bars from April, 2009 and trial is likely to take time. Thus petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He will otherwise face the trial. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. After considering rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this 2 case, I am of the view that petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, bail application is accepted and it is directed that accused-petitioner namely; Rohitash may be enlarged on bail under section 439 CrPC in FIR No. 33/2006 registered at Police Station – Mandawar, Dausa for offence under Section/s 302, 376 and 120-B IPC provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.40,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma