Petitioners WritPetition (SiNo.384Sof2008 3) Pahari Dutta, S/o. Late Satya Ranjan Dutta, aged about50 years, working as Trainlng !0fficer, . Grade II, t.T.i. Mana, RaiptirfCG). Ku. Rama Nirmal, D/o. Shri Baidao Rao. Nirmai.agec! about 48 years, working as AsstS. Grade II, I.TI. Mana, Distt. Raipur </~s/~'\ -^ ^^). . "y . Jawahar Shrivas, 3/o. Late B.L. Shrivas, aged about 47 years, working as Training Officer, I.T.!. Rajnandgaon, Distt. Rajjandgaon (CG).. Resoondants 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretary, man Power and P'anning Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(CG). 2. Director, : Employment and Training, Women PoMschnic Campus, Byran Bazaar.RaipuF (CG). , (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutlon of india.) SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri P,S, Koshy wjth Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocates for the petitioners. Smt. Sunita Jain, Panei Lawyerforthe respondents/S'tate (Passedon 21st day ofJulyi20(») With the consent-of tfie parties, the matter is taken up for hearing rinaily: 2) Leamed counseiappearing for the petftioners submits that the petitioners Np. 1 and 3were inltiaiiy appointed as Junior InstructorCraftsman on the pay scale of Rs, 740/- for the period of six month? on ad hoc basfe against the sanotioned vaoant posts, by Qrder dated 14-11-1986 and 19-11-1986 and the petitioner No.2 was inltially appointed.as Lower Division Clerk on ttie pay scate of Rs.515-10-575-15-800/- for the period of six mpnths on adhoc basis against the sanetioned vacant posts by order dated 31 -1 -1965 and posted at different it is. The sen/ices of the petitioners were continued' with artificial break of twoor three iays in servioe and workedcontinuously tili the date oflheir Fegularization. ,; ri •! •' naju 3) The simiiariy situated empioyees have approached the State Administrative Tribunai (for short, "SAT') in Originai Application No. 1979 of 1891 (Satish Kumar Mandloi Vs. State of State Madhya Pradesh and another) praying for similar reiief as sought for in this petition. Learned oounsel appearing for the peMtioner submits that ttiis case may aiso be disposea' of in the same terms and conditions. 4) Smt. Sunita Jain, iearned counsel appearing for the respondents/State e/ submits that the case pfthe petitioners wouid be consideFed in the iight ofthe order of the SAT as aforestated, after verifying the faots of the case, . 5) in view of the foregoing and categorical statement made by the isamed counse'i appearing for the State, the petition is atlowed in the same terms i.e., if the Committee finds them suitable for the post in ali aspects, they shali be regularized on the post heid by them and shall also pay them salary on regular scaie. They shail be entitied to saiary for the dates. on break Ih servioe. Thelr seniority shail be counteQ from the dates of their initial appointments. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge