BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Seventh day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15832 of 2011 1 PUSHPAVALLI 2 VELLAIAMMAL ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 & 2 Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PULIVALAM POLICE STATION, MANACHANALLUR, TRICHY DISTRICT. CRIME NO.166/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT FOR PETITIONER : M/S.M.SURI ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR BAIL UNDER SEC.439 CR.P.C. ORDER : THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER :- The petitioners are arrayed as A1 & A2 and they were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 13.11.2011 for the alleged commission of offences under Section 379 I.P.C., in Crime No.166 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek bail. 2.Heard Mr.M.Suri, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public prosecutor appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners are ranked as A1 & A2. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioners are women and they are also aged persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for bail. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the property has been recovered from the petitioners. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioners have no previous case and if for any reason, the petitioners are entitled for bail, stringent condition may be imposed. 5.Considering the submission made on both sides, I could see that the petitioners have no previous case and the property has been recovered from the petitioners who are women, and there is no bad antecedent against the petitioners, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail on the following conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-[Rupees Ten Thousand only] with two sureties https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thuraiyur and on further condition that the petitioners should appear before the Madurai, All Women Police Station, daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. sd/- 07/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THURAIYUR. 2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY. 3 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON FOR WOMEN, TRICHY. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PULIVALAM POLICE STATION, MANACHANALLUR, TRICHY DISTRICT. 5 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MADURAI. 6 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC TO M/S. M.SURI ADVOCATE SR.NO.42632. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15832 of 2011 Date :07/12/2011 2P/8C RPB : 07.12.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/