IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16803 of 2011 ---------- Suraj Sahil, son of Sajjan Ram, resident of village Bahuarwa, P.S. Ratanpura, District Supaul. …. Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar … Opposite Party -------- 03/ 13.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is an accused for offences punishable under sections 366, 420, 467 and 498 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant is the husband of the alleged victim Sabita Kumari and the allegation is that the petitioner, who happens to be a distant relation, had enticed her away. The said Sabita Kumari has also given her statement under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on 20.04.2009 (Annexure 2), whereafter final form had been submitted by the Police on 29.08.2010 (Annexure 3), but subsequently thereafter cognizance had been taken by the court below against the petitioner for the aforesaid offences. He further submits that in the year 2009 itself the said Sabita Kumari had filed Matrimonial Case No. 105 of 2009 against her husband for divorce, which is pending before the Family Court, Saharsa. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender of the sole petitioner, namely, Suraj Sahil within fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order in the court 2 below, he shall be admitted to bail on executing bail bond of Rs.10,000.00 (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Birpur, in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 38/2009 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. MPS/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )