THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTIC B.PRAKASH RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA W.P.NO.11379 OF 2011 ORDER: (Per BPR,J) Heard Sri P.V.Krishnaiah and the learned Government Pleader for Services-I and with their consent, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage. The petitioner, who is applicant before the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.5164 of 2010, filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, aggrieved by the interim order dated 4-10-2010, pending the said OA. The said interim order reads as under: “Pending further orders, there shall be an interim direction to the respondents to consider the case of the applicant for promotion to the post of D.C.T.O on the basis of the date of her appointment, seniority and rules.” The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent-authorities have not included his name in the impugned seniority list or otherwise. Having regard to the chequered events as stated in the main OA and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and having perused the material placed before this Court, it has to be examined as to whether the claim of the petitioner for promotion can be considered or not. The question of including the name of the petitioner in the seniority list can only be gone into after adducing oral and documentary evidence. All these questions have to be gone into by the competent authority by exercising powers conferred to it. However, the order passed by the Tribunal is modified to the effect that there shall be interim direction to the respondents to consider the case of the applicant-petitioner for promotion, on merits and in accordance with law. Subject to the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ B.PRAKASH RAO,J _________________ B.N.RAO NALLA,J rkk Dated: 20-4-2011