HISH COURT OF GHHATTISQARH : BILASPUR Division Bench M..C,C.NO,2J50f200S Coram : Aooellants Hon'ble Shrl Jagdish 8 Hon'MeShriSatishK. ha!ia,Actlng CJ ^nihatri, J i 1. 3. Versus Respondent State of Chhatiisgarh through the District Coilector, DrstnctDurg, CQ. The Divisional Forest Officer, Narainpur (P5, Division ! Narainpur, Distt. Bastar (Chhattisgarh) The Additional Tahsildar, S.D.O. Forest, Durg,' Sub Diviston, Distt. Durg(CG) j Bhurmal Baradia, .aged about 50 (pressntly 68) years, son of Late Shri Pdkharmai R/o. Sankari, Tahsil and Distt.Durg ; (Appiicstion fbr restoration of Second Appeal No.126 of 1991) PTesent: Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Governinent Advocats TOF the appeliants/State. iiid fPassed on 2"° November, 20075 The foliowing ora! order of the Gourt was passed by Hon'ble Shri Jagdish. Bhaila, ActmgC.J. The appellants have filed thisappltoation for restoration of Second Appeal No.12Sof1991. ' - !n the light of the reasons ihdicated in the application for restoration, we findsufficfent ground to restore the matter to its original number. Arcordingly, the application for rsstoration is atlowed and Second Appeal No. 126 of 1891 is J^torsi tsuts oriainal numbeL. Sd/- -BE5ng-Ctiief Justice Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge Suguna