IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-29430 of 2009 (O/M). Date of Decision : October 21, 2009. Rukhsana Khatun @ Rajni Devi daughter of Sharwan Kumar wife of Sharafat Ali, and another ...... Petitioners. Versus. State of Haryana, and others. ..... Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH. Present:- Mr. K.V. Nanda, Advocate, for the petitioners. AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL). Counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners have got married against the wishes of respondent No. 4-Sharwan Kumar, respondent No. 5-Soni Devi, respondent No. 6-Karam Vir, respondent No. 7-Jai Kumar, and respondent No. 8-Ram Dhari and there is threat to their lives and liberty from them. He contends that the petitioners have already made a representation dated 15.10.2009 (Annexure-P-4) before the respondent No. 2-Superintendent of Police, Yamuna Nagar, giving therein the details about the apprehension of the petitioners. He submits that they would be satisfied, if a direction be issued to the respondent No. 2-Superintendent of Police, Yamuna Nagar, to look into the matter and take appropriate steps in accordance with law. Without going into the merits of the case and the assertions as made by counsel for the petitioners, a direction is issued to the respondent No. 2-Superintendent of Police, Yamuna Nagar, to look into the representation dated 15.10.2009 (Annexure-P-4), preferred by the petitioners and take necessary steps in accordance with law. The petition stands disposed of in above terms. (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) JUDGE October 21, 2009. sjks.