1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 247 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 247 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 247 OF 2006 Ravindra Dayaram Damaniya and anr.... Petitioners Versus The Mumbai Municipal Corproation and Ors. ... Respondents None for Petitioners. Mrs. S. Ajitkumar for R. Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Rajiv Mane, A.G.P. for R. No. 3. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : MARCH 13, 2006 DATED : MARCH 13, 2006 DATED : MARCH 13, 2006 P.C. . None present for the Petitioner when the matter is called out. From the Prayer clause, it is apparent that the construction is demolished. Once that be the case, it is not possible for us to consider the relief as prayed for. Petition rejected. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.)