IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI THURSDAY, THE 23RD JUNE 2011 / 2ND ASHADHA 1933 MACA.No. 999 of 2006 ------------------------------------ OPMV.3635/2000 of MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, THRISSUR .................... APPELLANT(S): APPELLANT/3RD RESPONDENT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., REP. BY ITS ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, REGIONAL OFFICE, SHARANYA, HOSPITAL ROAD, KOCHI-11. BY ADV. SRI.MATHEWS JACOB, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.P.JACOB MATHEW RESPONDENTS / PETITIONERS 1 & 2 & RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 RESPECTIVELY: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VENUGOPALAN, S/O.KARAPPAKUTTY, MANIYANTHARA HOUSE, PALUVAI.P.O, GURUVAYUR, THRISSUR. 2. V.B.SUBITHA, W/O.VENUGOPALAN, MAMPULLY HOUSE, THAIKKAD, GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR. 3. B.KRISHNAN, S/O.BIHYA, BEERASHETTY PALAYAM, NARASIMHALAPET MANDAL, WARRANGAL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. PEDEGONI RAMULU, S/O.MALLIAH, GATTIKKAL, RFAYAPARTHY MANDAL, WARRANGAL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ADV. SRI.K.A.SALIL NARAYANAN FOR R2 THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: A.K.BASHEER & P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - M.A.C.A.No.999 OF 2006 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 23rd day of June 2011 JUDGMENT Basheer, J. This appeal is at the instance of the insurer of a vehicle involved in a road traffic accident. The claimant was awarded compensation by the Tribunal keeping in view various aspects like the age of the deceased, his income, etc. 2. However, dissatisfied by the above award the claimant had filed MACA 1186/05. This court by judgment dated July 20, 2010 awarded additional compensation of Rs.16,000/- and directed the insurance company to pay the said enhanced compensation also. In this appeal, the contention of the insurance company is that the amount awarded by the Tribunal is on the higher side. But since this court has already awarded enhanced compensation to the claimant, we do not find any reason to entertain this appeal. Therefore, it is dismissed. A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE jes