IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1676 of 2011 DINESHWAR PRASAD S/O LATE MAHAVIR PRASAD RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KHARKA, P.O. KHARKA, P.S. NANPUR, DISTT. SITAMARHI. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DAYASHANKAR PANDEY, REGISTRAR, SAHYOG SAMIT, BIHAR, PATNA, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 3. R.K. SRIVASTAVA, MANAGING DIRECTOR CUM MEMBER SECRETARY, STATE CADRE, COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. BIHAR. 4. SANJEEV KUMAR THAKUR MANAGING DIRECTOR CUM MEMBER SECRETARY DISTT. CADRE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. SITAMARHI. 5. KAMESHWAR PRASAD VERMA, BRANCH MANAGER, SITAMARHI, CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. PUPRI BRANCH, DISTT. SITAMARHI. ---------------------------------- With Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1677 of 2011 SAHDEV PATHAK, SON OF LATE JAIKANT PATHAK, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AWAPUR, P.S. PUPRI, DISTT. SITAMARHI. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DAYASHANKAR PANDEY, REGISTRAR, SAHYOG SAMIT, BIHAR, PATNA, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 3. R.K. SRIVASTAVA, MANAGING DIRECTOR CUM MEMBER SECRETARY, STATE CADRE, COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. BIHAR. 4. SANJEEV KUMAR THAKUR MANAGING DIRECTOR CUM MEMBER SECRETARY DISTT. CADRE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. SITAMARHI. 5. KAMESHWAR PRASAD VERMA, BRANCH MANAGER, SITAMARHI, CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. PUPRI BRANCH, DISTT. SITAMARHI ---------------------------------- With Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1678 of 2011 VEDANAND JHA, SON OF LATE RAMCHANDRA JHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KHARKA, P.O. KHARKA, P.S. NANPUR, DISTT. SITAMARHI. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DAYASHANKAR PANDEY, REGISTRAR, SAHYOG SAMIT, BIHAR, PATNA, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 3. R.K. SRIVASTAVA, MANAGING DIRECTOR CUM MEMBER SECRETARY, STATE CADRE, COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. BIHAR. 4. SANJEEV KUMAR THAKUR MANAGING DIRECTOR CUM MEMBER SECRETARY DISTT. CADRE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. SITAMARHI. 2 5. KAMESHWAR PRASAD VERMA, BRANCH MANAGER, SITAMARHI, CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. PUPRI BRANCH, DISTT. SITAMARHI For the petitioners : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Mishra, Advocate. For the Board : Mr. S.N. Pathak, Advocate. For the Bank : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate. ---------------------------------- 05. 11.11.2011 In compliance of the order of this Court dated 19.10.2011 supplementary show cause has been filed on behalf of opposite party nos.4 and 5 stating that whatever amount was available in the district cadre fund has been paid to the petitioners and now there is zero balance in the district cadre fund, as such, further arrears cannot be paid to the petitioners. In view of the statement made in the supplementary show cause, the three contempt petition(s) are disposed of, wherefrom it appears that each of the three petitioners have been paid Rs.2,17,924-32/-. The cheque is handed over to the counsel for the petitioners who is requested to grant receipt on the margin of the order sheet. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)