IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 4563 of 2008. Decided on: 10.08.2010. ________________________________________________________________ Jagdish Chander. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : None. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): The petitioner has already filed a representation for redressal of his grievance vide Annexure A-2, dated 6.2.1997 to the Secretary (Forests) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh. The same has not been decided till date. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the Secretary (Forests) to decide the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure A-2 by passing a speaking order, within a period of three months after the receipt of certified copy of this 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - judgment. In case the representation is decided in his favour, he shall be held entitled to all the consequential benefits. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. August 10, 2010. (sck).