IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 30944 of 1998 Between: K.Yadamma W/O Balaraju, Sweeper, Anwarul-Uloom Junior College, Nampally, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Govt. of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Secretary, Higher Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2. The Director, Intermediate Education, Nampally, Hyderabad. 3. The Secretary and Correspondent, Anwarul-Uloom College, Nampally, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings of the 2nd respondent in Rc.No.838/JC8-3-/98 Dt.30-08-1998 is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional, consequently direct the respondents to absorb the petitioner in her respective post as sweeper into grant-in- aid post in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.212 Edn. & Fin.dated 22-4-1994 from the date of initial appointment of her with all consequential benefits such as salary and seniority and direct the respondents to pay salary as per aided scales. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.JOGAIAH SARMA Counsel for the Respondents Nos.1 & 2: G.P. for Higher Education. Counsel for the Respondent No.3: MR.B.NALIN KUMAR The Court made the following : ORDER: This court by an Order Dt.7-3-2003 by adopting pragmatic approach directed the petitioner to make a representation to the school management to consider her case in the available vacancies and send necessary proposals to the competent authority. 2. In fact, in pursuance of the said order Dt.7-3-2003, the petitioner made a representation on 10-3-2003 to the Secretary and Correspondent – 3rd respondent, who was supposed to forward the same with necessary comments to the Director of School Education, Hyderabad. 3. According to the learned counsel for the 3rd respondent, the representation received from the petitioner was already sent to the Director of School Education, Hyderabad, and it is under consideration. 4 . In view of the above, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. However, the 3rd respondent shall pursue the matter and get necessary orders from the Director of School Education, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. With the above observation, the writ petition stands closed. __________ 13-08-2004 sh/prk To 1. The Secretary, Higher Education Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2. The Director, Intermediate Education, Nampally, Hyderabad. 3. The Secretary & Correspondent, Anwarul-uloom College, Nampally, Hyderabad. 4. Two CCs to the G.P. Higher Education, High Court Buildings, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad (out) 5. 2CD copies THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO.30944 OF 1998 Dated : 13-08-2004