IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.CHELAMESWAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 2ND JUNE 2011 / 12TH JYAISHTA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 1378 of 2010(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.20151/2009 Dated 17/08/2009 & ORDER DT.30.7.10 IN IA.4066/10 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- THE COMMONWEALTH TRUST INDIA LTD. SOUTH MANANCHIRA ROAD,KOZHIKODE-673 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR IN CHARGE. BY ADV. SRI.V.KRISHNA MENON RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SRI.N.C.MOYINKUTTY,THE DISTRICT SECRETARY,JANATHA DAL(S),(PRESENTLY SOCIALIST JANATHADAL),CONGRESS BHAVAN,TOWN HALL ROAD, KOZHIKODE-1. 2. SALEEM MADAVOOR,THE STATE GENERAL SECRETARY(YOUTH WING),JANATHA DAL(S)(PRESENTLY SOCIALIST JANATHADAL),CONGRESS BHAVAN, TOWN HALL ROAD,KOZHIKODE-1. 3. SRI.A.J.BABU,THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,KOZHIKODE TOWN CIRCLE,K.P.KESAVAMENON ROAD, KOZHIKODE. 4. SRI.RAJEEVAN,THE TALUK SURVEYOR, TALUK OFFICE,CIVIL STATION,KOZHIKODE-20. SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.MEERA FOR R3,4 SRI.SAJU.S.A FOR R1-R2 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J. CHELAMESWAR, C.J & ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------- Cont.Case.No. 1378 of 2010 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of June, 2011 JUDGMENT Antony Dominic, J. This Contempt Petition has been filed alleging disobedience on the part of the respondents in not complying with the directions in the judgment in WP(C).No.20151/2009 and the order in I.A.No.4066 of 2010. 2. It is now brought to our notice by the learned counsel for the petitioner that subsequent to the order dated 28.3.2011, directing the parties to make deposit of `50,000/- before the Executive Magistrate, the dispute has been resolved on purchase of the property on 13.5.2011. Therefore, according to the learned counsel, since the issue itself having been resolved, there is no necessity in prosecuting the matter any further. Therefore, we close the Contempt of Court Case. Needless to say that in view of the closure of the Contempt of Court Case, Cont.Case.1378/10 2 there is no necessity for the Executive Magistrate to insist compliance of the order dated 28.3.2011. J.CHELAMESWAR, CHIEF JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE vgs