IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. 3332 of 2008 Date of decision:- 27.10.2009 Balbir Singh petitioner vs Yashwant Singh Respondent Present: Mr. PL Singla, Advocate Mr. RK Lamba, Advocate. M.M.S.BEDI,J. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the lower appellate court has vacated the order of grant of interim mandatory injunction directing the defendant- respondent to demolish the wall, raised by him. It appears that the plaintiff- petitioner claims his right of passage on the southern side of the plot, sold to him by the defendant vide sale deed dated 25.3.1996 on the basis of an oral agreement. Prima facie it does not appear to be a case of easement of necessity. There does not appear to be any illegality in the order passed by the lower appellate court. The revision petition is dismissed. However, in the interest of justice, it is ordered that the trial court will decide the suit within a period of six month after the receipt of a certified copy of this order. The parties,however, will maintain status quo, as it exists today, during the pendency of the suit. October 27 ,2009 (M.M.S.BEDI) TSM JUDGE