IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28120 of 2010 RAJIV BAGWEY @ RAJU BEGWEY & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 11.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel for the state. Petitioner seek their bail in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case No. 79 of 2004 registered under sections-302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Admittedly, the alleged occurrence took place on 30.06.2004 and the FIR was lodged on 05.07.2004. In course of investigation, the daughter of deceased claimed to have seen the alleged occurrence and she has specifically stated before the police vide Paragraph-6 of the case diary that she disclosed about the alleged occurrence to her villagers on the very next morning of the alleged occurrence and according to the aforesaid version, the so-called eye witness namely, Shweta Kumari had already disclosed the name of the petitioners as murderers on 01.07.2004 but it is surprising enough that the aforesaid fact has not been mentioned by the informant even he lodged the FIR on 05.07.2004. Considering the facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, the petitioners, namely, Rajiv Bagwey @ Raju Begwey and Ravishankar @ Nutan Bagwey are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs - 2 - 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with S.Tr. No. 1078 of 2009/T.R. No. 404 of 2010 arising out of Amarpur P. S. Case No. 79 of 2004 to the satisfaction of Shri P.N. Tiwari, A.D.J., F.T.C.-II, Banka. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)