IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 9TH JANUARY 2009 / 19TH POUSHA, 1930 WP(C).No. 872 of 2009(D) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- SANTHOSH BOBAN, S/O.V.NARAYANANKUTTY MENON, VALORE HOUSE, IRINJALAKUDA, TRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.M.N.UNNIKRISHNAN SRI.P.K.MOHANAN(PALAKKAD) RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE IRINJALAKUDA TOWN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.55, IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER, THE IRINJALAKUDA TOWN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.55. 3. THE RETURNING OFFICER FOR THE ELECTION OF MANAGING COMMITTEE, IRINJALAKUDA TOWN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.55. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES OFFICE, IRINJALAKUDA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSHKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J. ================================== W.P.(C)No.872 of 2009-D ================================== Dated this the 9th day of January, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner seeks relief against the contents of Ext.P2. This is how I understand this writ petition. Asserting that he is a reporter of a news daily and a social worker, the petitioner aspires to contest for the election to the managing committee of the first respondent. He made Ext.P1 representation before the society. Either in the writ petition or in Ext.P1, I do not find any assertion that the petitioner is a member of the first respondent society. Not only that, the election has not been notified. On notification of the election, consequences either in terms of Rule 35 or 35-A of the KCS Rules will follow. The General Manager of the bank appears to have taken the correct view while issuing Ext.P2. I, therefore, do not find any ground to direct WPC872/09 -:2:- consideration of Ext.P3. Writ petition fails. It is accordingly dismissed. Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, Judge. sl.