IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NOS.1386/05, 1387/05, 1388/05 1389/05, 1390/05, 1391/05, 1392/05. ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:----------------------------------- Mr.R.N.Sanghavi for the petitioner in all the petitions. Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh A.P.P. for the State in WP Nos.1386/05, 1387/05. Mr.P.A.Pol A.P.P. for the State in WP Nos.1388/05, 1389/05, 1390/05. Mr.S.V.More A.P.P. for the State in WP Nos.1391/05, 1392/05. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED: 11TH JULY, 2006 DATED: 11TH JULY, 2006 DATED: 11TH JULY, 2006. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. This group of writ petitions is directed against the identical orders passed by the Sessions Court in criminal revision applications filed by one and the same petitioner in different complaints filed against him. All the revisions, before the Sessions Court, were directed against the order, "issue process" passed by the Magistrate in criminal complaints filed by respondent no.1 under section 138 read with section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. I heard this group for quite sometime and since I was not inclined to interfere with the impugned order Mr.Singhavi, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly stated that I need not record the reasons and the petitioner will be satisfied if the directions are given to the Magistrate to dispose of all the complaints expeditously. In view thereof I refrain from recording the reasons for rejecting this group of petitions. However, let me only record that I did not find any infirmity, worth mentioning, in the impugned orders. The writ petitions, accordingly, fail and are dismissed as such. The hearing of the cases before the Magistrate is expedited. The trial Court shall decide the complaints on merits in accordance with law and uninfluenced by the observations made by the Sessions Court in the impugned orders. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. It is open for the parties to apply to the learned Magistrate for clubbing all the matters and hear them together. If such an application is filed, same may be considered in accordance with law. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)