1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.138 OF 2006 IN REVIEW PETITION ST.NO.21445 OF 2006 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.1191 OF 2002 Ruia Fiscal Services Pvt.Ltd. ..Applicant. V/s. Cormorant Investment Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondent. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.139 OF 2006 IN REVIEW PETITION ST.NO.21438 OF 2006 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.1190 OF 2002 Sri Ram Business Pvt.Ltd. ..Applicant. V/s. Cormorant Investment Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. P.K.Dhakephalkar i/b. Sachin V. Dhakephalkar, advocate for the applicants. Mr. Navin Parikh i/b Shri Haresh Mansukhani, advocate for the respondent. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : DECEMBER 12, 2006. DATE : DECEMBER 12, 2006. DATE : DECEMBER 12, 2006. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. Delay in filing Review Petition as computed by the office is about 15 days. The reason indicated 2 in the applications is that the officer who was dealing with the court matters left the company, on account of which the matters went unattended. Although this application is opposed, in the interest of justice, as the delay is only of 15 days, the same is condoned. Both the applications are allowed. Ordered accordingly.