CT gg^^gg'g-s ^ HISM COURT OF WWfHISWKH AT UUtSPUR W.P. (Sl No. 2084 trf 2007 Petittoner Versus Respondents Panchrom 'nwNwit, S/o. Shri Heera Lal Thenrait, oged about 42 yeors, Assistnt Teocher, 6wt. MicUle School- Khokhora (Tai^lr), Block - Nawagarh, t»istt. - Jorygir^hompa (C.6.) 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Deapurhnent of Education E>.K.S. Bhawn, Raipur (C.6.) 2. Director Public Instruction Chhuttisgorh ®ovt.Raipu* 3. District Education Offiser, t)istt. - Jorygir-Chnmpa (,Cj6.) 4. Block Education Offiwr, Btock - NaiBogarh Distt. - Jorygir-Champo (C.&.) SB; Hontole Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J Present; Mr. Anil Singh R<yP"t, Advocdte for the petitioner. Mr. Vinay Pandey, Panel l.anyer for State/respondents. OR&ER (Passed on this 4*1' Dcy of April, 2007) t. The quwtion of IONF inwhyed herein dsto whether the petH'wner Is entitted to regyAw pay scole w.e.f. the date of imtial appointment or fron» the date of completton of probation period. 2. Leamed counsel appeoring for the petittoner cs i»ell as for the State/respondents jointly submit thort- the focts and question of tonf involved the [yesent writ petition are •the same (»to that of in W. P. (S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiuiari ond others vs. State 6overmnent of Chhattisgorh & others), which »wsalloured vide order dated 7.11.2006. 3. In view of -the above-stated sutsBissions made by leamed couBel fw the parties, the «wit petjtion is altowed in the same terms. No order os to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge ThdktB*