HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR CRP No.5797 of 2008 ORDER: This revision is preferred questioning order dated 03.11.2008 in E.A No.27 of 2008 in EA No.271 of 2003 in EP No.12 of 2003 in OS No.1784 of 2002 on the file of I Senior Civil Judge, City Civil court, Hyderabad. 2. E.A.No.27 of 2008 in E.A No.271 of 2003 is filed under Order VI Rule 17 read with 28 of Civil Rules of Practice to permit petitioner to amend the pleadings in E.A.No.271 of 2003, which is a claim petition. 3. Admittedly, E.P is filed enforcing Lok Adalat Award dated 21.12.2002. Trial Court dismissed the petition holding that petition filed for amendment is not maintainable and the objections raised on behalf of petitioner that schedule properties are Wakf properties cannot be decided in the petition and on that ground the petition was dismissed. 4. Heard both sides. 5. Advocate for petitioner submitted that the properties are wakf properties and two persons by colluding together and obtained award playing fraud before Lok Adalat and on the basis of that award they want to grab wakf properties, therefore to protect interest of wakf, claim petition is filed. 6. Advocate for respondents submitted that the remedy of petitioner was not before the executing court because by way of claim petition, petitioner cannot challenge the correctness of Lok Adalat award and it is only by way of writ and even a civil suit is prohibited under Legal Services Authority Act questioning award, therefore court below was right in dismissing the petition. 6. Advocate for revision petitioner in reply submitted that at least liberty may be given to petitioner to avail the remedies available under law to challenge the Lok Adalat award. 7. Considering the submissions of both parties and considering the material on record, I am of the view that court below has not committed any error in dismissing the petition and that there are no merits in the revision. However, petitioner is given liberty to take appropriate legal action to challenge Lok Adalat Award. 8. With this observation, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this revision shall stand closed. __________________ S. RAVI KUMAR, J Date: 31-03-2016. gvl