IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2127 of 2008 VIJAY NARAYAN SINGH & ORS Versus BALESHWAR SINGH & ANR ----------- 2. 5.1.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioners. In view of the facts mentioned in the limitation petition, the delay of 14 days in filing this civil revision application is condoned. Coming to the merits of this case, this Court would not find any error much less any jurisdictional error so as to interfere with the impugned order. The court below having noted that the suit was of the year 2004 in which the evidence of the plaintiffs petitioners had already been closed on 19.1.2006 had rejected the prayer of the petitioners made on 10.7.2008 for exhibiting two receipts, one dated 2.1.2007 and the other dated 2.7.2008. Both these receipts in fact would have no evidentiary value and in any event they having even not been produced at the time of filing of the suit could not have been even otherwise taken on record. 2 That being so, there is no merit in this application and accordingly, it is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/