IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER CHAMBER CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 133 OF 2002 SUMMONS NO. 133 OF 2002 SUMMONS NO. 133 OF 2002 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 39 OF 2001 PETITION NO. 39 OF 2001 PETITION NO. 39 OF 2001 Samata Industrial Premises ... Petitioner Welfare Society & Ors. V/s. D.B. Abhyankar & Ors. ... Respondents And Victor Gulbano ... Applicant Mr. Umesh Shetty for the petitioner. Mr. M.A. Sayed i/b. Dhru & Co. for respondent No.10 Mr. N. Sahu i/b. S.K. Srivastav & Co. for respondent Nos. 3 to 9. Mr. N. Pandit, AGP for respondent No.2. None for applicant in CH.S. No.133 of 2002. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 13th December, 2006 : 13th December, 2006 : 13th December, 2006 P.C. . Though the applicant is not present, considering what is set out in the affidavit in support of the Chamber Summons, the applicant will be entitled to intervene. Hence, Chamber Summons made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). The petitioners are directed to amend the cause title by adding applicant as party respondent within two weeks from today. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] ( 2 ) [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]