^ •ss^la-HC—js ati^r ^i R-fi* W 3fl1^?T?FWRi' ~F31 "4I<IIC1<4, ^Ttl'y'Ko, fqcll'Hy *ii*i<ii a»*ii«*> TF^ZOO SiI^T'q^? (1<:l(31<vcl) cwisR ^Tcd STf^T W.P. IS1 No. 696/2009 PETITIONER Ratansiijigh Bhoi, S/o Shri Phudukram Bhoi, 4ged about 22 years, Village Jerebhaj-am, P.O.Chhote Loram Developitnent Block Pithora, Tehsil & District-t Mahasamund Versus RESPONDENTS 1. 2. 3. 4. High 1\ Ravi Raipur CONSTITU SB: HON. SHRI DHIRENDRA 05-2-2009 Shri Utkarsh Vanna, ShriY.S. Thakur, Dy. Ai Heard. The petitioner has fili following reliefs:- "10.1.Direct by issuing the respondent circular dated 2 supra) ^tTq^tfll "RTRffTf "^f 1^TSt <[^(t^l< ^sifin 3ii^i State |of Chhattisgarh, through the Secreta|ry, Department of Home, D.K.S. Bhawai|i, Raipur Directot- General of Police, State of Chhatt^sgarh, Directorate, Raipur Superu^tendent of Police (Railways), Goyern(nent Railway Police, Raipur ^vel Caste Scrutiny Committee, ihankar University Campus, WRIT PETITION UNDflR ARTICLE 226 OF THE tION OF INDIA MISHRA cotinsel for the petitioner. Ivocate General for fhe State. [d the instant petition for the Pte writ of inandainus to ]io.3 to act as per the p.9.2007 (Annexure P-7 'XI-HC—78 '3^'*ll<11<1<l,S)Tll'M;|io,rq<11'H^< ^tl^WIT t(»*11<h "^200 sn^i 'tRg? (1}?f3«^) an^Tv\ K-u"h ^T'BWE crar w^f st^v<ft ^mw^fta aii^i -z'•//1 <!hl^id4l'1 'RPT^Tf ^f f§l<?|<T^^i< ^? aifin sii^i 10.2 Direct by issuing the writ of mandamus to the respondent fio.4 to verify the caste certificate withjout demanding any document whatsol ^ ver from the petitioner." Leamed counsel for t|he petitioner submits that the petitioner wa.s recruited on scheduled tribe category vid 13.8.2008. Subsequent to his directed to produce pennaner^t caste cerdficate duly verified by the competent authority vid| 5.1.2009 and the petitioner account of non-production of\ verified by the competent autt] the State of Chhattisgarh vid the post of Constable in the order of Annexure P-3 dated recruitment, the petitioner was s order of Annexure P-6 dated rias not been allowed joining on permanent caste certificate duly .onty. Learned counsel for th^ petitioner further submits that circular of Annexure P-7 dated 26th September 2007 issuedfjlirections to various departments of the State to provisionally a^low the successful candidates of reserved category to join theii^ their caste certificates by Committed. In case, the ca^ may be terminated and neces submits that his applicatio services subject to verification of •he High Level Caste Scrutiny te certiHcate produced by such candidates is found to be fals^, the concerned employee/officer sary action may be taken against him. Despite the above circjular, respondent No.3 has not allowed the petitioner to joiiji on the post of Constable. He n for verification of the .caste _4: K'aw^?"^''' XI-HC—78 silt^iwR-ti* wn ^fl^<i si»*ii<^ T5E( •^l'4lc1'4,yal'y're, IsKii^y »n*iciia»*ii<t) WI,200 sn^i 'q^q? (•iqlaiyi) '^nw^ct <w^<i •'s' circumsttnces petitjioner leariied certificate is pending before Coinmittee. In these to provisionally allow the On the other hand that the petitioner may be di^ Scrutiny Committee and cooij the mater of verification to his In view of the above the parties, the instant petiticj respondent No.3 to provision; the post of Constable till his veriGed by the High Level Gi petitioner is also directed to on 20th February 2009 and for expeditious decision in permanent caste certificate. Certified copy as per rul dn 4)l^<rl41*1 tfTq^T^f Jfei^ •([ai^R ^sTRm^n^T the High Level Caste Scrutiny the respondents be directed to join his services. counsel for the State submits ^ected to appear before the Caste srate with the said Committee in permanent caste certificate. sitibmission of learned counsel for is disposed of with direction to ^lly allow the petitioner to join on .^ermanent caste certificate is duly |ste Scrutiny Coinmittee and the tppear before the said Committee c^operate with the said Comn'iittee fche matter of verification of his ;s. Sd/- Dhu-endra Mishra Judge B ?>:A ^a