IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY WRIT PETITION No.13983 of 2005 Between: M.Raghav Reddy. … Petitioner And Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajampet, Kadapa District and three others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri T.P.Acharya for Sri Karanam Ramesh. Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Revenue for R.1 to R.3. Sri K.S.Murthy for R.4. This Court made the following: ORDER:- At the interlocutory stage, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This Writ Petition is filed for a Writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction of respondents 2 and 3 in implementing order dated 4-5-2005 passed by respondent No.1, as illegal and arbitrary. In paragraph 6 of the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of respondents 1 and 2 it is stated that the said order was implemented on 10-12-2005. Sri T.P.Acharya, learned counsel representing the petitioner, submitted that in view of implementation of the said order, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration. Sri K.S.Murthy, learned counsel for respondent No.4, however, submitted that against order dated 4-5-2005 his client filed an appeal before the Joint Collector, Cuddapah district and that the same is pending. Since the order, whose implementation is sought for in this Writ Petition was already implemented, the Writ Petition has become infructuous. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. However, this order does not preclude respondent No.4 from pursuing his appeal said to have been filed before Joint Collector, Cuddapah district, against order dated 4-5-2005 passed by respondent No.1. ------------------------------------ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J 19-6-2008 MNR