[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVN.APPLN.NO.513 OF 2007 WITH CRIMINAL REVN.APPLN.NO.514 OF 2007 Smt.Susy Richad ..Applicant Vs. Shri.Vishwas Balkrishna Jain and Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.A.H.Nagi i/b H.H.Nagi and Associate for Applicant Mr.Dileep V.Bhangare Advocate for Respondent No.1 Mr.K.V.Saste A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JULY 25, 2008 DATE : JULY 25, 2008 DATE : JULY 25, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant-original accused, the learned advocate for the respondent no.1-original complainant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant was convicted by the learned Judicial Magistrate F.C. 1st Court, Kalyan in two cases under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaints in both cases were filed by Respondent No.1. Being aggrieved by the conviction [-2-] and sentence the applicant preferred appeals. As there was delay in filing the appeals, applications for condonation of delay came to be preferred. The said applications came to be rejected, hence, these revisions. 3. During the pendency of this revisions, the parties have arrived at settlement and they have sought permission to compound the matter. The parties have tendered the consent terms which are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. Both the revision applications are disposed of in terms of consent terms. It is made clear that respondent no.1 is allowed to withdraw the amount of Rs.5 lakhs which has been deposited by the applicant before the trial Court. 4. Both the Revisions are disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]