1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.__________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3040 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 3511 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3042 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 3597 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3044 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 4593 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar/s orders | and Registrar’s orders | Mrs. R.K. Ladda, AGP for the State. CORAM : K. U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 30 th November, 2009 1 Heard learned AGP for the State. 2 There is delay of 1446 and 1447 days in preferring appeal against the order of learned Civil Judge, Sr.Dn., Latur in the respective Land Acquisition References. Judgment and order is dt. 30-11-2004. Application for certified copy was moved 2 belatedly on 26-8-2005 which was ready for delivery on 26-10-2005. Thereafter the matter was processed. Delay occurred shows the casual approach of the concerned authority associated with laxity. No reasonable excuse could be accelerated. 3 That apart, having gone through the order under challenge of the reference court, I think that it is in tune with the sale instances and the rates in prevalence at the time of acquisition. Delay is not properly explained. Respective application dismissed with first appeal. Necessary court fees be refunded. ( K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.) dyb / office /ca3040.09.odt