IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. No. 6730 of 2011. Decided on: 24th August, 2011. Ram Lal. ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. …… Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kumar Dhiman, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral): The writ petition is filed with the following prayers: “I) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other Writ, Order, Direction directing the respondent to grant the pension and other pensionary benefit to the petitioner from the date when the petitioner completed his ten year service with the respondent. Before the 1994 or from the due date. II) That the respondent may kindly be directed to give the arrears to the petitioner from the due date when the petitioner completed ten years of service i.e., in the year 1994 to the petitioner.” 2 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the case is squarely covered by the decision of the Apex Court in Mool Raj Upadhyaya vs. State of H.P., 1994 Supp. (2) SCC 316. 3. Learned Additional Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will file appropriate representation furnishing all factual details before the competent authority, within a period of one month from today. It is always open for him to do so. Thereafter, the matter will be duly considered by the second respondent/competent authority in the light of the judgment, referred to above and appropriate action in accordance with law will be taken within another four months from the date of production of the representation(s) alongwith a copy of this judgment and the copy of the judgment, referred to above, by the petitioner. 4. The writ petition is disposed of, so also pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. August 24, 2011 (bhupender/K. Attri)