IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 4 OF 2009 GOPI RAMA NAIK AND 2 ORS., ... Petitioners Versus PANDURANG GOPINATH GAUNEKAR AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Valmiki Menezes,Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Thalmann Pradeep Pereira,Advocate for the respondent No.1. Coram:- SMT. R. S. DALVI, J. Date:- 17th April, 2009 P.C. The petitioners have challenged the order of the Civil Judge, J.D., Ponda dated 09.09.2008 dismissing the application for stay of the hearing of the contempt proceedings against the defendants. The suit was stayed and the enquiry before the Mamlatdar's Court was pending. However, an interim order was granted. That order is stated to have been violated and breached. The proceedings under Order 39, Rule 2A of the C.P.C. were to follow. These proceedings have nothing to do with the suit, the plaintiffs' claim in the suit, or the stay of the suit. The defendants' claim that these proceedings be heard along with the suit after the issue of tenancy is decided. The claim is entirely misconceived. The application for showing whether there was wilful breach of the order of injunction, is a completely different matter. Hence, the order dated 09.09.2008 does not suffer from any infirmity. The writ petition is dismissed. SMT. R. S. DALVI, J. SMA