IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 20TH JUNE 2011 / 30TH JYAISHTA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 1756 of 2011() --------------------------------------- (CRIME NO.460/2009 OF MALAPPURAM POLICE STATION) ....... PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED: ----------------------------------------- 1. SHAREEFA BEEVI, D/O.K.V.K.POOKOYA THANGAL, SAYYID MANZIL, KURUVA, MAKKARAPARAMBU, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. POOVANTHODI KUNHUMUHAMMED, S/O.BEERAN, KOTTAPPADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. CHAPPANGAKATTIL MASTHAN, S/O.KUNHUMUHAMMED, KOTTAPPADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. PERUMPALLY KUNHUMUHAMMED, S/O.MUHAMMED KURIKKAL, KOTTAPPADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BABU S. NAIR RESPONDENT(S): STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MALAPPURAM POLICE STATION - THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 680 031. 2. SAYED UMMER CHERUKOYA THANGAL, S/O.SAYED ABDULLA FAKEEH THANGAL, PARAYIL PUTHIYAMALIYEKKAL HOUSE, VENGARA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676 304. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. V. MANU R2 BY ADV. SMT.M.T.SHEEBA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss CRMC.NO.1756/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEX.A: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT BEFORE THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KOZHIKODE DTD. 15/10/2009. ANNEX.B: COPY OF THE F.I.R. IN CRIME NO.460/2009 OF THE MALAPPURAM POLICE STATION. ANNEX.C: COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN TO BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 4/06/2011. ANNEX.D: COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN TO BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 15/06/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J. ==================================== Crl. M.C. No.1756 of 2011 ==================================== Dated this the 20th day of June, 2011 O R D E R Petitioners are accused in Crime No.460 of 2009 of Malappuram Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 465, 468, 471, 402, 420 and 120(b) read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioners requested to quash proceedings against them as per a settlement. When the matter came up for hearing learned counsel sought permission to withdraw this petition without prejudice to the right of petitioners to take appropriate plea/defence in the trial court. Having heard learned counsel on both sides and the learned Public Prosecutor I am inclined to allow the request. Resultantly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Case is dismissed without prejudice to the right of petitioners to take appropriate plea/defence in the trial court. THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE. vsv