IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. O. O. C. J. O. O. C. J. SUIT NO. 3169 OF 1996 SUIT NO. 3169 OF 1996 SUIT NO. 3169 OF 1996 Gujarat Sidhee Cement Ltd. ... Plaintiffs V/s The Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. ... Defendants Mr. A.V. Doijode for the plaintiffs. None for the defendants. CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. DATED: 18TH AUGUST, 2004. DATED: 18TH AUGUST, 2004. DATED: 18TH AUGUST, 2004. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The advocate for the plaintiffs present. None present for the defendants. 2. On perusal of the record, it is seen that the dispute is governed by the provisions of Sec. 7(B) of the Indian Telegraphs Act, 1885 and, therefore, is required to be referred to the Arbitrator. Hence, by virtue of Sec.7(B) of the Indian Telegraphs Act, 1885, the dispute between the parties is referred to the sole arbitrator to be appointed by the Central Government under the said provisions. 2 The Arbitrator shall decide the dispute and dispose it of within six months from the date of receipt of this order. The suit, in the circumstances, stands disposed of. Refund as per law. .....