IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS THURSDAY, THE 24TH JUNE 2010 / 3RD ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 10049 of 2010(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- SHYBIMON, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.LATE DIVAKARAN, PUTHAN NIKARTHIL, MUTTATHIPARAMB P.O., CHERTHALA. BY ADV. SRI.B.PRAMOD RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALAPPUZHA. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHERTHALA. 3. HARIDAS, S/O.CHELLAPPAN, PUTHAN THARA, THANNEERMUKKOM PANCHAYAT, WARD NO.19, MUTTATHIPARAMBU P.O., CHERTHALA. 4. RAHUL, S/O.HARIDAS, PUTHAN THARA, THANNEERMUKKOM PANCHAYAT, WARD NO.19, MUTTATHIPARAMBU P.O., CHERTHALA. 5. KARTHIKEYAN, S/O.VAVA, PUTHAN THARA,THANNEERMUKKOM PANCHAYAT, WARD NO.19, MUTTATHIPARAMBU P.O., CHERTHALA. 6. SHAJI, S/O.CHELLAPPAN, NIKARTHIL, T.P.,WARD NO.20, KOKKOTHAMANGALAM P.O., CHERTHALA. G.P. SHRI T. K VIPINDAS FOR R1 & 2 ADV. SRI.R.AZAD BABU FOR R3-R6 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 10049 of 2010 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE I.A. NO. 673/2009 IN O.S. NO. 550/08 OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, CHERTHALA. EXT.P2 : COMPLAINT SUBMITTED TO THE 1ST AND 2ND RESPONDENTS. EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL A/D CARD RECEIVED BY THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL // TRUE COPY // K. M. JOSEPH & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 10049 of 2010 E - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 24th day of June, 2010 JUDGMENT Joseph, J. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking police protection to the life of the petitioner. 2. We heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for respondents 3 to 6 as also the learned Government Pleader. 3. The learned counsel for respondents 3 to 6 submits that those respondents have no intention to cause any threat to the life of the petitioner. He submits that civil disputes are pending between the petitioner and respondents 3 to 6 in various courts. 4. We dispose of the Writ Petition recording the submission of the learned counsel for respondents 3 to 6. In W.P.(C).No. 10049 of 2010 2 case there is any threat, it is open to the petitioner to bring the same to the notice of the second respondent, who shall take action in accordance with law. (K. M. JOSEPH) Judge (M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS) Judge tm