In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. CR No. 269 of 2011 (O&M) Decided on January20,2011. Rakesh Bansal -- Petitioner vs. Vivek Kackria and another --Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Dr.Anmol Rattan Sidhu, SrAdvocate, with Mr.Rajesh Narang,Advocate,for the petitioner. Mr.Arun Palli, Sr.Advocate, with Mr.KVS Kang,Advocate, for the respondents. Rakesh Kumar Jain, J, (Oral) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be granted some time to deposit arrears of rent. This revision petition is, thus, not argued on merit and the same is dismissed. However, one month's time allowed by the learned Appellate Authority to deposit the arrears of rent, failing which the landlord shall be capable to get the decree executed, is further extended to three months from today. The remaining directions contained in the order of the learned Appellate Authority shall be maintained. January 20,2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge