Jf- naiu ^ Respondents Writ Petltion (SS Ho. 4609 of 2008 Nazar Mahammed, S/o. Gul Mohammed, aged about 55 yeare, Peon, Imgation Department, Sub Division - Nawagarh, Tahsil - Nawap.arh, District Durg (CG). Versus 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretar^, Irrigation Departmert, D.K.S. Bha'/rein, Fulantraiaya, Raipur(CG5. 2. The Chief Engineer, Sub Division Nawagarh, TahsilNawagarh; DistrictDurg (C<3). 3. The Exeoutlve Engineer, Sub Division - Ngwagarh, Tahsi! - ' Nawagarh, Distriot Durg (CG). <Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) SB: Hon'bte 1 Shri S.C.Verma, counse! for the petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, DepLrty Advocate Generai with Shri Bhaskar Payasi, Panel Lawyer fortheState. (Passedon this25th dayof August, With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the petition is heard finally. 2) Learried counsef appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press this petitton on merits, at this stage. However, the petitioner may be permftted to make a representation before the concemed authorities Vt'ithin a period of three days and the same may be directed to be oonsidered and ctecideci, in accordance with !aw, within the prescribed time. 3) Shri Y.S. Thakur, learned Depyty Advocate General appearing for the State submits that if the representation is made, the same shali be considereci and decided by the concerned authority, in accordance with law, on its own merits, with.'n a period oftwo weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 4) Shri Thatajr further submits that no coeroive steps shali be taken against the petitioner, tiil the disposa! of the representation.. 5) I hope and trust that the State Go^^rnment shai! examine the repreSentation obj'ectiveiy in accordance with !aw and guideiines, issued by the Government time to time . 6) in view of the foregoing, ths petition stands disposed of. No brder as to costs. Sd/- ^., SatisliK.Agnfflt>tri -.;..„,•Judge "