IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8064 of 2010 HARI LAL SAH, son of Late Panchoo Lal Sah, resident of Ward No.25, Professor Colony, Forbisganj, P.S. Forbisganj, District Araria. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt, of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Vice-Chancellor, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Madhepura, District- Madhepura. 4. The Registrar, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Madhepura, Distt.-Madhepura. 5. The Principal, Forbisganj College, Forbisganj, District Araira. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 10.5.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-University. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation as a Reader from Forbisganj College, District Araria on 31st of July,2004 under the respondent-University, his retiral dues have not been finally fixed as yet inasmuch as the past services rendered by him has not been taken into consideration. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner had represented his grievances earlier before the respondent-authorities, however, for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Registrar, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Madhepura (respondent no.4). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of the unpaid claims as 2 also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation may be settled at the earliest and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid. However, upon consideration, if any of the claims or any part of the claims is found not admissible, the same shall be informed to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)