wp3444-11.doc 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3444 OF 2011 M/s.Akaash Impex .. Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.A.M.Saraogi for petitioner Mr.S.N.Bhosale AGP for State. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 10th JUNE 2011. P.C.: 1] Heard Mr.Saraogi for petitioner. He submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by a common order which is passed on the application seeking condonation of delay, admission of revision application and interim stay. He submits that the petitioners have not been heard when the revision application was admitted, delay was condoned and the interim stay has been granted. wp3444-11.doc 2 2] The petitioners have final and conclusive rights in the subject property and at the instance of second respondent, no revision could have been entertained. 3] Without going into these contentions at this stage and keeping pleas of all parties open in that behalf, in my view, interest of justice would be served if the Divisional Joint Registrar, before whom the revision application No.220 of 2010 is pending, is directed to decide it as expeditiously as possible and within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)