IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.934 of 2008 MITHLESH SINGH & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 17.4.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The appellate court has affirmed the conviction under sections 323 and 379 of the I.P.C. passed by the learned trial court and sentenced them to pay a fine of Rs.100/- Rs.150/- respectively. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is a bonafide land dispute and, in fact, the land in question belongs to the petitioners no.1 and 2. He submits that in view of the aforesaid circumstances no case under sections 323 and 379 of the I.P.C. would be made out against them. In course of the trial the prosecution examined two witnesses, whereas the defence did not examine any witness. After having heard the learned counsel for the parties this Court does not find any material to interfere with the aforesaid Judgment of conviction passed by the trial court and affirmed by the appellate court. However, in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and also in view of the fact that petitioners no.1 and 2 are claiming the land to be of their own I observe that the conviction would not incur any disqualification as provided under the provisions of Offenders Act. 2 With the aforesaid direction this application is disposed of. Anilkrsinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)