2501ca2031.06.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR C.A.NO.2031/06 IN F.A.NO.156 OF 1990 State of Maharashtra and ors. ..vs.. Narayanprasad Raghuvirprasad Pande ............................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ............................................................................................................................................................... Smt. Jachak, AGP for the appellant. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATED : 25th January, 2011. Heard Smt. Jachak, learned A.G.P. for the appellant/State. By the above civil application, the applicant prays for condonation of delay in filing the application for bringing the heirs of the respondent on record. The reasons for the delay are mentioned in the civil application. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents no.1 and 5 i.e. widow and son of the original respondent fairly concedes to the said application. Hence, for the reasons stated in the civil application, the same is allowed. Resultantly, the delay in filing the application for bringing the heirs on record is condoned. The civil application is accordingly disposed of. C.A.NO.2030 OF 2006 By the above civil application, the applicant seeks setting aside of the abatement qua the respondent. By an order passed today, the delay in filing the application for 2501ca2031.06.odt 2 bringing the legal representatives on record has already been condoned. In view thereof, the above civil application is allowed. Consequently, the abatement would stand set aside. The civil application is accordingly disposed of. C.A.NO.2032 of 2006. By the above civil application, the applicant seeks to bring the heirs of the respondent on record. The name of the heirs are mentioned in paragraph no.3 of the civil application. The civil application is, therefore, allowed. The learned AGP to carry out the amendment in the cause title of the appeal within a period of two weeks from date and serve an amended copy on the learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 and 5, who waives notice on their behalf. In respect of the other respondents, office to issue notice returnable in twelve weeks. The civil application is accordingly disposed of. C.A.F.NO.161 of 2011. In view of the order passed in Civil Application No.2032 of 2006, no orders are necessary to be passed on the above civil application, which is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE chute