2306wp3960.00.odt 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETIITION NO. 3960 OF 2000 WITH CIVIL APPLICATIONS (CAW) NO. 1649 &1650 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETIITION NO. 3960 OF 2000 (P. K. Udupa Narayan Udupa through Lrs. Smt. Aumathi wd/o P. K. Udupa & 3 others Vs.Krishna Marotrao Kohad)) ...................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ...................................................................................................................................................................... Mr. V. P. Panpalia, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. D. G. Paunikar,, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATED : 23rd JUNE 2010. CIVIL APPLICATIONS (CAW) NO. 1649 & 1650 OF 2010: These are the applications for bringing legal heirs of the deceased petitioner on record so also for condoning the delay and setting aside the order of abatement. Considering the contentions raised in the applications, both the applications deserve to be allowed and the same are accordingly allowed. Legal representatives of the deceased petitioner are permitted to be brought on record by setting aside the abatement. The delay occured in bringing the legal representatives on record stands condoned. The applications are disposed of accordingly. WRIT PETIITION NO. 3960 OF 2000 The parties to the litigation have placed on record a 2306wp3960.00.odt 2/2 pursis (stamp No. 6239/10), signed by the Counsel appearing for both the parties. It transpires that the parties have settled the dispute out of the Court. It is also noted in the pursis placed on record that vacant possession of the suit property has already been handed over to the respondent. The petitioner has further no objection for withdrawal of amount deposited in this Court by the respondent or his power of attorney holder. In view of this, the petitioner does not want to prosecute the matter further and seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Leave is granted. Writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn accordingly. Rule discharged. No costs. JUDGE wwl