IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 9054 of 2008 Decided on: 31.3.2011 Sh. Yogender Pal …Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner : Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents : Ms. Anjula Khajuria, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Petitioner has made representation for the redressal of his grievance that his case be considered for regularization against the vacant post of Junior Draughtsman instead of Helper. The representation made by the petitioner was duly recommended by the Executive Engineer as per Annexure-PD to the Superintending Engineer, Operation Circle, HPSEB, District Kullu. However, till date no decision has been taken on the representation and recommendations made by the Executive Engineer on 15.12.1998. 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the Superintending Engineer, Operation Circle, HPSEB, Kullu to decide the representation made by the petitioner by 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No -2- passing a speaking/detailed order, within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment. No costs. Copy dasti on usual terms. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge March 31, 2011 (K. Attri)