Civil Misc. No.4372 of 2011 in/and Civil Writ Petition No. 4815 of 2001 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Misc. No.4372 of 2011 in/and Civil Writ Petition No. 4815 of 2001 DATE OF DECISION: JULY 14, 2011 Roshan Lal .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana & others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. V.K. Vashishta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Nehra, Sr. DAG, Haryana, for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. Initially, the petitioner has approached this Court through the present writ petition for seeking writ of mandamus directing the respondents to regularize his services as Assistant Pump Operator/Water Pump Operator-II i.e. Class III post and further to direct the respondents to grant him the scale of Class III employees, who are working as Water Pump Operator. As per the counsel for the petitioner services of the petitioner have already been regularized and now he is only left with grievance that he is entitled to pay scale of ` 1200-2040/-, which is now further revised. The writ petition was admitted and Civil Misc. No.4372 of 2011 has now been filed by the petitioner for early hearing of the writ petition on the ground that during the pendency of the petition, Government itself has issued policy instructions Civil Misc. No.4372 of 2011 in/and Civil Writ Petition No. 4815 of 2001 -2- regulating the payment of pay scale of `1200-2040/-. Thus, prayer has been made through the said application for hearing the writ petition and for disposing the same in terms of the policy instructions. Notice of the application was issued to Mr. Sunil Nehra, Sr. DAG, Haryana, who says that the matter can be disposed of by directing the respondents to see whether the case of the petitioner is covered by the policy instructions for grant of pay scale of `1200-2040/-. This suggestion is acceptable to the counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, with the concurrence of the parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and is disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner in the light of the policy instructions and to see if he would be entitled to a technical pay scale of `1200-2040/-, which has been subsequently revised, in accordance with law laid down by this Court. July 14, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH) monika JUDGE