IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 1879 of 2009. Date of Decision : February 05, 2009. Anangpal .... Petitioner. Versus. State of Haryana and others . ...Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH. Present: Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL). In the present writ petition, the challenge is to the award dated 04.01.2008 (Annexure-P-4), passed by the Labour Court-II, Faridabad, wherein reference has been answered against the petitioner-workman. Counsel for the petitioner contends that although the workman has been put to work in different projects but the controlling authority as far as the projects are concerned is one and therefore, the services rendered by the workman in the different projects which should have been taken together to count his period of service which would entitle him for the benefit of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The perusal of the award would clearly indicate that the workman has been put to work in different projects for which specific appointment letter and agreement which have been placed on record by the respondents indicating that the projects were sponsored by different organisations and was working in different fields. The workman was performing different type of works and he was not working on the same post. Apart from that the workman has not completed 240 days as required C.W.P. No. 1879 of 2009. under the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, and therefore, no benefit can be granted to the petitioner-workman. The award is in accordance with law, therefore, no interference with the award is called for by this Court. In view of the above, the present writ petition stands dismissed. (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) JUDGE February 05, 2009. sjks. -2-