HI§H COURT OF CHHATTI56ARH AT BILASPUR W. P.(S) No. 1486 af 2007 Pe'ri'i'ioners‘ : 1. Shukhdev Pmsad Sahu, 5/0. Shri Late! Ram Sahu, aged abou'r 44 yaars, Assistanf Teacher, 6cv+. Middla Schoa!-5umedha, Block- Kafghom, Dis++.-Kor'ba (€16) Z. Bahadur Singh Chha‘l’ri, 5/0. Shri Jeevon singh Chhm'ri, aged abou‘i’ 45 years, kssisfan'r Teacher, GOVT. Midd!e schwkéevara Basri, Block—Ka‘fgham, Dis‘rt—Korba (Ca) 3. Ba§bhcmdm Prasad Bewangan, 5/0 5hri Sycxm La! Dewangan, aged about 42 year; Assiskmf Teacher, 6W1: Primary schnaJ-Kuruda, Biock-Balnda, Disi"f—J'anjgir Champa ((3.6) Versus Respondenfs : 1. 51‘crf2 af Chhm'i’isgm‘h, Through - Tha 5ecre‘rary Depar‘l'menf of Educa‘rion D.K.5. ghawcm, Raipur (65.) 2. Dired’or PubTic insfmcfion Chhu'f'fisgarh Govt Raipur" 3‘ Disfrivr Educa‘rion Offiter, Disft—J’anjgir-Champa (C.6.) 4. Disfricf Educcmmi Oficer, D3511. Korba, ($6.) 5. Assismn‘r €ommissioner, Tribal Welfare District Karba (C‘G‘) h) SB: Hon'ble Mr. Jusfice Sa‘i'ish K. Agnihoh'i, J Presen’r: Mr. A.$. Rajput, Advoca're for The petitioner. Mr. Ajay Dwivedi, Pane! Lawyer" for STa‘i'e/respondenfs. G R D E R (Passed on fhis 14"“ Day of March, 2007) 1. The pefifioners ware appein+ed in fhe yaar 1982 as Assis‘fanf Teachers on fixed pay scaie of Rs. 150/-. AHer complefi0n a‘f fwo years proba‘l’ion, They were gratifed reguiur pay scale sf Rs. 169- 300A 2. Learned coijnszl appearing for +he pefifianers submi'm Tha‘l’ 1'he issue invah/ed in ‘i'he casa is as'i’c whe‘i’hei", “Hie pe'iii'ioners are aimed +0 regular pay scale w‘ef. ’i'i’ie dafe cf ini'i'iai uppoinfmerii' 9r af‘i’zr compie‘l’ibn 9f prabu'i'ion period’ 3. Thé issziz invoivad, herein was caesidered by fhe Madhyu Pradesh Siefe Adminisi‘m‘iive Tribunal, Jabalpur in QA. No. 2?45/$9 (Mudhukan‘i' Vadu and 56 cfhers Vs. Sfa'i‘e of MP. c3: oihers), «herein if was held fha‘i' 'i'he similarly si'fue‘ree +eathers are enfii’led +0 regular pay ecale wef. ‘i'he ea‘fe of ini‘i‘ial appoinfmen'r. The mai‘fer‘ was ‘i'aken-up Te The Hon'ble Supreme Cour-l" in Special Leave Pe'fi'l'ion (Civil) Ne. 6892/93. The said pe'li'iion was dismissed by iiie Han‘ble Supreme €our‘i' uphelding 'fhe decision of fhe Trihunal i’o ihe effeci' +im+ ihe Teachers/Assism’n'l' Teachers are en’ii'fled 'i'o regular pay sceie from do‘fe of inii'ial appoin'rmen‘l’. my“ “M i 4. Learned comse! appaarfng far 1412 pa'ri'rioners furfher submit; fha? 'fhis Court whik considering fhe same issue in Amar 5ai Ram & n+h2r$ V5. Sim-e of Chhu‘f‘fisgarh (31 oiimrs (WP. (5) No. 4725/ 2006) by order dm‘ed 1.9.2006, has grani'ed regular pay scaie wef. ‘i'he da‘fe of ini‘h'a! appoinfmenf. 5. Lzarnad counsal appearing far ‘f'he par'h‘es jaimly submi? fha'f' fhis case is squarely covered by The eecisiom of +his Cour? in +he case of Amer Sai Ram & afhers Vs. SW12 of Chha'r‘fisgarh & whers (Supra) 6. In view of The? fhis peri‘fion f5: dispased of in ‘f‘ne same ferma No order as 1'0 cosfso I J \ f J Sd/— ; Satish K. Agnihotri r Judge ' we“