IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.44 of 2007 Between: M/s. Shirdi Sai Balaji Constructions, Srikakulam District. ..... Petitioner AND The Superintending Engineer, Tribal Welfare Circle-Sector No.8, Visakhapatnam District & others. .....Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Ch. Satish Kumar Counsel for the respondents: GP for Social Welfare The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.44 of 2007 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly on ein the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the representation of the writ petitioner and contemplating to recover the seigniorage charges at the enhanced rates, as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and discriminative and declare that the petitioner is entitled for the revision of estimates in terms of minutes of Board Meeting dated 30.01.2004 on the relevant Memo’s on par with the similarly situated persons in respect of the work relating to BT road from Chupi to Budari Singi (0/0-4/2 KM) under agreement No./2005-2006, dated 15.04.2005 and further direct the respondents to revise the estimates by providing reimbursement of the differences in seigniorage charges as per G.O.Ms.No.217, dated 29.09.2004.” At the hearing, Sri Ch. Satish Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that in pursuance of the interim direction granted by this Court, the bills were paid to the petitioner without deducting the seigniorage charges and that as the interim order has worked itself out, no adjudication of the Writ Petition on merits is required. Having regard to the above submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.64 of 2007 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also disposed of as infructuous. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 21.06.2011 ES