CWP No. 5643 of 2010 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 5643 of 2010 (O&M) Decided on : 20-04-2011 Dr. Neelam Hooda ....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Mr.N.K.Malhotra, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana MAHESH GROVER, J The petitioner is aggrieved by the recording of adverse confidential report against her for the period 2005-06 which is attached alongwith the instant petition as Annexure P-6. The grievance of the petitioner is that this ACR has been recorded at the behest of respondent no.4 against whom she has made allegations of sexual harassment which was inquired into by the respondents and the petitioner and the said respondent were advised not to indulge in slugging. On a prior occasion too, the respondent no.4 had adversely commented on the service record of the petitioner forcing her to file a writ petition and subsequently the said remarks were expunged. The very same officer has now once again recorded adverse remarks against the petitioner. Ordinarily a representation should have been made to the respondents highlighting the grievance which has been raised in the CWP No. 5643 of 2010 (O&M) 2 petition. Learned counsel for petitioner contends that representation has been made to the respondents which fact is denied by the respondents. Be that as it may be, the Court does not wish to travel into this domain of assertion and denial and deems it appropriate at this stage to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondent no.2 to treat this writ petition as a representation against the adverse remarks for the period 2005-06 and take an appropriate decision in this regard within a period of six weeks from the date of the receipt of the copy of this order. Disposed of. April 20 , 2011 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge