1 wp2437-2011.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2437 OF 2011 Vidyadhar Ganesh Mahajan & Ors. ..Petitioners vs. The Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority & Ors. ..Respondents Mr.N.V. Walawalkar,Sr.Advocate i/b. Mr.P.G. Karande for the Petitioners. Mr.V.Y. Sanglikar for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. CORAM:- B.R. GAVAI, J DATED :- MARCH 23, 2011. P.C. 1 The learned Counsel for respondent nos.2 and 3 on issues raised in the Chamber Summons No.79-2011 makes a categorical statement that the said respondents would delete prayer clause (b) of the said chamber summons. 2 In that view of the matter, insofar as impugned order passed in Chamber Summons No.79/2011, it would stand to be inoperative. It is needless to state that the parties would always be at liberty to raise the 2 wp2437-2011.sxw question regarding the relevancy or irrelevancy or admissibility or inadmissibility of the evidence at the stage of hearing of the application filed under Section 9-A of the CPC. 3 Petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. (B.R. GAVAI, J)