(^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S.)NO. L\^l /2009 PETITIONER llil!:" .,^ c^^^ ^^^- ^-^- '^-- ^v' RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. ^o^/^ ^~*^^ ^/ ^\<^\ (S.B.^s^) «j; ^\ (^L^s ^^-~~^r/ ^TAtt^ Sanat Kumar Choubey S/o. Shri Gopal Prasad Choubey, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Maro, Post Maro, Block Navagarh, District Bilaspur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary, Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The District Education Officer Durg, District Durg (C.G.) The Block Education Officer, Block Navagarh, District Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OP THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARY OR ANY QTHER_WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC. !C—78 Sll^T'SFT'f^TW WT 3?n^T s?)*iic»» -5fc ^ '3'^r ^NI^I^ ^Ti1^4i<o, f^Kni^y J-(p. C^>) ^^1, IMCTI tblicft ^.....^............^...,.........:..........^ 200^ / 3?n^?T '<T5w (yst^^) ^<TTW^f?^3^[ SB: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICB PlUTINKER DIWAKER 20.8.2009 Shri V.Rathore, counsel fc| Shri Vivek Sharma, P.L. f4 Contention of the the petitioner. r the State. petiticjner covered with the decision of th^ orders passed by this Court in id|e Counsel for the petitione^ this petition with Uberty to| respondent No.l. He further sul^ for deciding the representaticji expeditiously. Counsel for the State sublnits a position to make any statem^nt petitioner is covered by the orc identical writ petition. He how< make a representation to the r< decided strictiy in accordance wil Accordingly, the petition i$ iiberty as aforesaid. In the representation by the petitioner the date of receipt of the copy of be decided within a period of tlin is that his case is squarely Supreme Court and also various mtical matters. at this stage, wants to withdraw file representation before the •mits that direction may be issued ;n so made by the petitioner, '^P)lfel4t<l <iH<nf "^ fest <F3i^i< i|T3tfim 371^1 ^' that at this stage he is not in |nt as to whether the case of the sr passed in the aforementioned ^er submits that let the petition ^spondent No. 1 which would be |h law. dismissed as withdrawn with 'the |eventuality of filing any such ^ithin a period of three weeks from [his order^ the same is expected to mcnths. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge