:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2986 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 2986 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 2986 OF 2006 Capt. Bibhas Kanti Pal .....Petitioner. vs. Mrs. Maitreyee Bibhas Pal .....Respondent. Shri Vishal Kasbekar i/by. D.B. Parmar for the petitioner. Ms. Kokila Kalra for the respondents. CORAM: S.B. MHASE, J. CORAM: S.B. MHASE, J. CORAM: S.B. MHASE, J. DATED: 2ND MAY, 2006. DATED: 2ND MAY, 2006. DATED: 2ND MAY, 2006. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Prima-facie the Trial court has found that the marriage is subsisting. The only ground challenged in the impugned order is that there is no evidence of marriage. However the trial court is satisfied on the basis of photographs that the marriage exists. No interference is called for. Petition rejected. :2: Learned counsel at this stage submitted that the petition be expedited. Petition is expedited provided the petitioner regularly pays the amount of maintenance alongwith the arrears and the legal expenses as directed by the Trial court. The petition shall be disposed off within a period of one year. **********