IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4952 of 2009 MAINA DEVI @ USHA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 18.02.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. In this renewed prayer for anticipatory bail in a police case under Sections 498A and 304B of the Indian Penal Code and 315 of Dowry Prohibition Act, this Court is not satisfied that any fresh ground has been made to reconsider the prayer. Nonetheless, learned counsel places before this Court certain orders of this Court granting regular bail to the husband of the deceased and the husband of the present petitioner. If that be so, obviously any application for regular bail on behalf of petitioner shall have to be considered in the light of the regular bail-orders passed by this Court when the accusations are common with regard to the petitioner as those granted regular bail, without being prejudiced by the present order. Notwithstanding the dismissal of this application for anticipatory bail, any application for regular bail shall have to be considered in the light of the aforesaid observation. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)