^^z -s=—?- c^,, IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ('C.G.I WRIT PETITION CS) N0. '*-:Y'<^H ^2Q1Q PETIJIQNERS ^^ ^y «}?'• A ^'.^••' 1. Ramanuj Sharma, S/o. Mukund Lal Sharma, aged about 50 years, Ward No.5, Mohbhatta, Post & Tahsil Bemetara, District Durg (C.G.). 2. Basant Kumar, S/o. Shri Shiv Prasad Pandey, aged about 50 years, Village Amora, Post Bijabhar, Tahsil Bemetara, District Durg (C.G.). 3. Santosh Kumar Soni, S/o. Ramji Lal Soni, aged about 45 years, Ward No.13, Village Nayapara, Nearby Durga Mandir, Tahsil Bemetara, District Durg (C.G.). 4. Rajendra Pandey, S/o. Shri Rama Prasad Pandey, aged about 46 years, Village Nayapara, in front of Gound Dharamsala, Tahsil Bemetara, District Durg (C.G.). 5. Ku. Sashi Tiwari, D/o. Shri R.P.Tiwari, aged about 40 years, Mohbhatta Road, Tahsil Bemetara, District Durg (C.G.). 6. Ku. Mamta Pandey, D/o. Shri Rama Prasad Pandey, aged ^^QW^V^; ^>-<-% ;9'/ v:. I s j S.B.^<a?fti!<! s i ^ u^i j --- -^r--—y- _^a&- !; !. -i8. l%>.. "—"^/^"J VliCs^. ^ \'^ "'^ f?' RESPONDENTS about 40 years, Ward No.14, Village Nayapara, in front of Gound Dharamsala, Tahsil Bemetara, District Durg (C.G.). 7. Anil Kumar, S/o. Shri Ram Kumar Tiwari, aged about 48 years, Ward No.6, Brahmanpara, Vill. Mohbhatta, Tahsil Bemetara, District Durg. 8. Ku. Sunita Tiwari, D/o. Shri Durga Prasad Tiwari, aged about 40 years, Ward No.6, Brahmanpara, Mohbhatta Road, Tahsil Bemetara, District Durg. 9. Vibha Pathak, D/o. Shri D.N.Jha, aged about 41 years, Civil Colony, Tahsil Bemetara, District Durg (C.G.). 10. Shankar Lal Sahu, S/o. Shri K.L.Sahu, aged about 45 years, Sundar Nagar, Tahsil Bemetara, District Durg (C.G.). 11. Manoj Kumar Sharma, S/o. Late Badri Prasad Tiwari, aged about 43 years, Ward No.6, Brahmanpara, Vill. Mohbhatta Road, Tahsil Bemetara District Durg (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Education Department (Ministry), D.K.S. Bhawan, G.E. Road, Raipur(CG) I: 2. Deputy Director of Public Instruction, Education Department, Post Office Pension Bada, Arvind Nagar Ward, Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. F 75T "i)l'iil<')<<, afl1<H'l6, (««')l'Mll,< 3Hi?T V^R '•.2^..1.^^lT^l!j^ VWW »11<») "w2 fa'b^ST' aforesaid liberty. Sd/- pritinker DiwAar Judge [•cite -^fe" an^i^iT f?;ri?'3iit?i a^i^ •R[^l si'^i^RiRre'gfsd <»>i^[<n*<1Ti^i^cff ^ fs^ ^i^rt ^? aifigiT aii^i S.B.: HQN'BLB JUSTICE^R. PSITINHER DIWAKBR 16-12-2010 Shri Alok Nigam, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Praveen Das, Dy. G.A. for the State. Counsel for ftie . petitioners wants to witlidraw fhis petition wifh Uberty to make appropriate representaTion before fhe coiapetentaufhority. Sta.te counsel has no objection if the petitioners niake any such represeatation.. Accrodtngly, fhe petitioners are permitted. to withdraw fhis petition with the