IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4919 OF 2004 IN FAMILY COURT PETITION NO.A-395 OF 1992 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4921 OF 2004 IN FAMILY COURT PETITION NO.A-392 OF 1992 Rameshchandra Prabhlal Modi ..Petitioner Vs. Renuka Rameshchandra Modi ..Respondent Mr.Pankaj Bhatt for the petitioner Mr.A.S.Kadapkar for the respondent CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J DATED : 16TH NOVEMBER, 2005 DATED : 16TH NOVEMBER, 2005 DATED : 16TH NOVEMBER, 2005 P.C.: 1. Both the parties have tendered the Consent Terms duly signed dt.21.9.05 which are taken on record and marked ’X’ for identification. The said consent terms with the consent of the parties are modified as under: 2. The amount mentioned in clause 7 of Rs.24,000/- is substituted by Rs.30,000/-. Payment to be made within two weeks from today by the petitioner to the respondent herein. The learned counsel for the petitioner also states that the petitioner will not raise any objection in respect of return of ornaments of the respondent lying with the Income Tax Authorities and the respondent would be entitle to claim the same back. 3. In so far as articles of respondent are concerned, the petitioner advocate states that the respondent can visit the premises of the petitioner after giving notice of 48 hours and two weeks from today and shall identify her articles which are lying with the petitioner. On such identification petitioner will return the same to the respondent herein. With the aforesaid modification, both the petitions are disposed of in terms of consent terms taken on record. No order as to costs.