‘W’ma W. P. (S) No. PETITIONER Shmb Bunch IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR LRéL OF 2011. /, Ku. Sarita Giri, (Now Smt. Sarita Dewangan) W/o. Shri Nahush ‘ Kumar Dewangan, aged about 39 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School Kodejunga, Block Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.) v E R s U s :1 7” State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bha'wan, Raipur (C. G.) 9‘ ESPONDENTS é?“ ® Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Kanker, Distt. Kanker (C. G.) Block Education Officer, Kanker, Distt. Kanker (C. G.) Treasury Officer, Treasury Account and Pension, Kanker, Distt. Kanker (C. G.) Joint Director, ‘ Treasury Account and Pension, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar at Jagdalpur (C. G.) / R RIT PETITION UNDER ARICLE 226 OF THE W T CONSTITUTION OF INDIA mm H Pmg‘uqm H 200 mm (Wu) Mmm wmm WWW WW fs€tm $aimm 8.3.: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKER 03.08.201 1 Shri Somkant Verma, counsel for the psti‘rioner. Shxi N.Naha Roy, P.L. fox the Statg. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to beneot of two advan cc increments on account of she having passed B.T.I. examination in the year 1993 before his appointment at her own cost It is submitted that the issue involved in the present petition is no longer res integra and the same has been ‘linaHy decided by the Hon’ble Supieme Court in the case of Asha Saxena V . State of M.P. & 01's. 2009 (III)MPJR (SC) 59. It is further submitted at this Court has also taken a similar View in its order dated 6.2.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No. 6257/2008. Counsel for the etitioners further submits that the order dated 29.42010 passed in Writ Appeal NO. 124/ 2009, wherein mlying up n the judgment of the Supxeme Court in the case of Asha Sax na (supra) and the order passed by this Comt in another Writ Appeal No. 87/2009, directions have been issued for conside tion of the case for grant of two advance increments as per c' ular dated 21.9.1974 issued by the State of Madhva Prades , after verification of the facts pleaded in the petiuon. Counsel for the State su mits that case of the petin'oner would also be considered on same lines. XI—HC 78 mm 111 zoo mm (Wu) mmw «imam Wmm WW WWR $mm em‘tion is disposed of With a horities to decide the Chaim of o advance increments as per led by the State of Madhya e facts pleaded in the petition rom today. Court has not. expressed any and the authority concemed 1e same strictly in accordance In View of above, the f direction to the mspondent au‘ the petitioner for grant of tw circular dated 21.9.1974 isst Ptadesh after vermcation of th Within a period of four months f It is made clear that this opinion on merits of the case would be at liberty to decide 1i with law. ‘. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge