IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 5674 of 2008 Decided on: 05.10.2010 Nirmal Sharma and others. …Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioners. : Mr. K.C. Sankhyan, Advocate vice Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr.R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : In sequel to order dated 16.07.2010, Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General placed on record a copy of letter dated 12th August, 2010. A bare perusal of this letter reveals that the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. 2. Consequently, the present petition is rendered infructuous and the same is dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge October 5, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?