CWP No. 186 of 2003 with CWP No. 187 of 2003 CWP No. 186 of 2003 18.12.2008 Present: Mr. B.C. Negi, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Surender Sharma, counsel for respondent No. 2. Mr. P.K. Sharma, Additional Advocate General for respondent No. 3. Mr. D.Dadhwal, counsel for respondent No. 5. CWP No. 187 of 2003 Mr. B.C. Negi, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Surender Sharma, counsel for respondent No. 2. Mr. P.K. Sharma, Additional Advocate General for respondent No. 3. It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioners, in both the writ petitions, that since the passing of the impugned order by the Tribunal, i.e. order dated 27th February 2003, petitioners’ services have been regularized and that now, the only grievance of the petitioners is about the date of regularization. According to the learned counsel, petitioners’ plea is that they are entitled to the regularization of the service from a date, earlier in point of time, than the date from which their services have been regularized and that they may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petitions, with liberty to make a representation to the concerned authorities to seek regularization CWP No. 186 of 2003 with CWP No. 187 of 2003 of their services from the date, they feel they are entitled to and also to file fresh petitions, in case their representations are not decided, according to their satisfaction. In view of the above stated position, both the writ petitions are dismissed, as not pressed. Petitioners may approach the concerned authorities for regularization of their services from the back date and in case the representations are not decided to their satisfaction, they may file fresh writ petitions. (R.B. Misra), J. December 18, 2008(vs) (Surjit Singh), J.