IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL NO : 1311 of 2001 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated ______ in WP NO : 4166 OF 2001 on the file of the High Court.) Between: ..... APPELLANT AND .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant:MR.A.RAJASEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: . The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL No.1311 OF 2001 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari) Sri K.P.Vijaya Bhaskar, learned Counsel representing Sri A.Rajashekar Reddy, learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the cause in the writ appeal does not survive. Recording the said submission, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. _______________________ T.MEENA KUMARI, J. _____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J. Date: 01.09.2008 GS/ASP