IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH JULY 2008 / 18TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 802 of 2005(U) ------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------ THE PRESIDENT, PONKUNNAM AIDED SCHOOL TEACHERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., NO.K.651, PONKUNNAM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.BABY SRI.R.KIRAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. K.C. JOSEPH, KURISUMMOOTTIL HOUSE, PONKUNNAM P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, ELAPPARA, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP FOR R1 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.R.SABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/07/2008, ALONG WITH WPC NO. 16548 OF 2004 WPC NO. 7618 OF 2005, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).No.802/2005 2 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF PETITION DATED 16.2.1999 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT BEFORE THE DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER, KOTTAYAM. EXT.P2: COPY OF CLAIM STATEMENT DATED 29.1.2001 FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN I.D.NO.5/2001. EXT.P3: COPY OF WRITTEN STATEMENT FILED BY THE PETITIONER MANAGEMENT BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN I.D.5/2001. EXT.P4: COPY OF AWARD DATED 11.8.2004 IN ID.5/2001 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE S.SIRI JAGAN, J ==================== W.P (C) .Nos.802 of 2005, 7618 of 2005 &16548 of 2004 ==================== Dated this the 9th day of July, 2008. J U D G M E N T These three writ petitions relate to the same subject matter namely, reinstatement of the petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 7618/05 by the petitioners in the other two writ petitions pursuant to the award passed in an Industrial Dispute namely I.D.No. 5/2001 before the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki. Now the parties have come to a settlement to the effect that the workman would be reinstated in service with effect from February 2005 with all consequential benefits and the parties agree that these writ petitions be disposed of in terms of that settlement. In view of the above settlement between the parties, these writ petitions are disposed of recording the above settlement and declaring that instead of the award which is the subject matter of the writ petitions, the above settlement would govern the issue involved in these proceedings. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE rhs