IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5939 of 2009 CHAYA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 13.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The claim in this writ application is for arrears of salary from 5.12.2006 up-to-date for discharge of duties as Panchayat Teacher. The Mukhia by order dated 14.8.2007 opined that the appointment was not in accordance with law and cancelled the appointment. The matter was then placed before the statutory authority under Rule 18, the Block Development Officer, who has ruled by his order dated 31.12.2008 that the order of Mukhia was not in consonance with law by a reasoned discussion and set aside the same. Counsel for the State has found himself at a loss as to why the petitioner has approached this Court for the relief after an order of the statutory authority. The writ application is allowed. Respondent no. 6 is obliged to comply the order of the Block Development Officer within a maximum period of four weeks from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order by payment of all necessary arrears of the petitioner. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)