IN THE HIGH COURT OF £HHATTI$GARH AT BILA’S?U§ M,A, No.‘ 2 t OF 2003 APEEILANT (JefEJAmANm VERSUS RE$261€DENT$ NiiN—APPLICANTS Manbodh, Son of Dhaniram aged about 38 years! resident of village 1 Parsiya, Poli Station'~ Bhaiyathan, ce Tahsil — Surajpur, Dist z $urguja ( C G ).' Kedar Singh, Son 0f_Gore, resident Near A.C.Co Gate, Dist :‘Durg (‘C G ).’ g DRIVER ) Jagat Pal; $0n of Har- »narayanl aged about SO years / / APPEAL UNDER SECTION FOR THE‘ENHANCEMENT OF THE AWARD. .e W , _ Appeal valued in sum of Court fee paid Claimed in the Claims Amount awarded in sum of . \ w, Obeupation ~ Business, resident of Adarsh Nagar, Durg, Police-$tétion,‘Tahsil & District — Durg ( C G ). c owmEg a) The New India Insursnce Company Ltd.through WarishtheN Mandal Menager‘ ( Superior Regional Manager The New India insurance 7H Company Ltd., Office at : Korba,_ Dist’ : Korba ( CAG . ( INSURER ) . 173 OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, 1988 m. 1£Q9,000/ k. 15/~ only_ Rs. 5,75%), 000/— Tribunal $5 kn 2,500/e with 8% interest p.a, g! , .< ) M LOK ADALAT Chhattisgarh High Court Campus, Bilaspur Case No. MA? 2241 u ‘of 20‘03 Wévoéh Appellani/s Versus Respondent/s koala/v JygM} Z 0% {M ' , u 9‘ i . fa Appeuaniwj'm / by Shri 0m f/wwwh 7M4” Advocate Respondent/\woifh 1 \N -} / by~Shn " @W %7lz Advocate Mum W Maw) Jww A MVWLL W 9W QMWMA . ad, bow4 AWARD (Passed on 01% 02‘260‘7) IVDM {0N W“ M/WW Parties file a compromise petition The terms are just We hereby record the compromise and pass an award In terms of compromise and order that appeH—ant / respondent shali (my respondent / appeiiant a sum of Rs. 5+_5_O_’_Q[r 05? f’ /by way of ”“73 compensation tegemeL—Mmmterest @ _ /o-per WLMn CW Maa WW Jfwu ;fui?z/@%;zfg %£4 m MLM ‘aafe M WJAZVWJ' is S I Sd/— . ‘. \k‘ , - ,‘- Member LokAdaiat Sunil Kumar L Sinha ’ a \ High Court of Chhattisgarh t ‘ Bllaspur Judge [ “penigmuwomunmgamm; Member Lmadam r ‘ m, ‘ V W woogrgrgggfgwsg ‘ mhztaaicf u BILASPUR _V _ cw ‘ ii KgVi r \ ‘ d