IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9981 of 2008 Sukhdeo Gareri, Son of Late Munilal Gareri, Resident of Village + P.O. – Gareri Tola Sahsaul, P.S. – Basnahi, District - Saharsa. ………. Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Birpur District – Supaul. 4. Superintendent Engineer, Nahar Anchal Saharsa, District – Saharsa. 5. Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division Raghopur, Nahar Anchal Saharsa, District – Saharsa. 6. District Provident Fund Officer, Saharsa District – Saharsa. …………. Respondents ---------------------------------- 2 04.11.2011 Heard Sri Sharda Nand Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Parineeta Rai, learned A.C. to Government Pleader No. 7, appearing on behalf of all the respondents. The present writ petition was filed in the year 2008 with a prayer to direct the respondents to make payment of G.P.F. amount which was deducted from 1979 to September, 1995 with interest. In this case, earlier a counter affidavit was filed wherein it was indicated that G.P.F. amount for the relevant period was already paid to the petitioner. Thereafter, a supplementary counter affidavit was filed by respondent no. 6 in the month of January, 2010, wherein it has been indicated that even amount for the deduction made during work-charge period has also been paid to the petitioner. It was submitted by learned counsel for the state that grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed. In this case, no rejoinder to the counter affidavit has 2 been filed by the petitioner. However, it was prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner that the writ petition may be disposed of in view of stand taken in the counter affidavit but liberty may be granted to the petitioner to approach the authority concerned if still any grievance exists. In view of stand taken by the parties, the writ petition stands disposed of. However, if still any grievance exists, the petitioner shall be entitled to approach the authority concerned by filing representation. If such representation is filed, the court expects that same will be examined and disposed of in accordance with law without any delay. The writ petition stands disposed of. Praful ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)