IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. LPA No. 749 of 2010 Date of Decision: July 2, 2010 Union of India and others …Appellants Versus Ex. Naik (TS) Daya Singh …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present: Ms. Renu Bala Sharma, Central Government Counsel, for the appellants. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. This appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent challenges order dated 8.9.2009, passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP No. 13943 of 2009. It was not disputed before the learned Single Judge that the issue regarding payment of disability pension was covered against the appellants and in favour of the writ petitioner-respondent by a Division Bench judgment of this Court rendered in the case of Paramjit Singh v. Union of India and others (CWP No. 67 of 2007, decided on 12.2.2008, Annexure P-3). Once the factual and legal position was conceded before the learned Single Judge, LPA No. 749 of 2010 there was no room for the appellants to file the instant appeal. Even otherwise, the matter is covered by the Division Bench judgment of this Court rendered in the case of Paramjit Singh (supra) as the observations from the Division Bench have been quoted by the learned Single Judge. Accordingly, the appeal fails and the same is dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (A.N. JINDAL) July 2, 2010 JUDGE Pkapoor 2