1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.169/2003 in WP NO.5212/2002 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.DV Tele, AGP for State. *** CORAM: S.S.SHINDE ,J. DATE : 27 th JULY, 2011. PER COURT: 1) Though the petitioner is served through court-service notice, they have not bothered to appear either in person or by engaging any counsel of their choice. 2) This Contempt Petition alleges disobedience of the interim order dated 29th January, 1996, thereby the respondents in the writ petition were restrained from evicting the members of the petitioner-union till alternate premises are offered to them. 3) Learned Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that there was no breach of the interim order. The member of the petitioner-union were not evicted from the premises in question. He further submits that subsequently Writ Petition No.5212/2002 came to be finally decided by this court on 26th October, 2010. In that view of the matter and in the light of the statement made by learned Counsel for the respondents, in my opinion, no further orders are required to be passed in this contempt petition. Hence, the contempt petition stands disposed of. Notice stands discharged. (S.S.SHINDE,J.) bdv/