1 WP 8774.2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. WRIT PETITION NO. 8774 OF 2011 (Balaji Shankar Kamble VS. The State of Maharashtra and ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. Shashikant S. Londhe, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. P.P. More, A.G.P. for the respondent-State Mr. S.G. Sangle, Advocate for respondent nos.3 to 5 ... CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 21.11.2011 P.C.:- 1. Heard. The petitioner has approached this Court after taking part in the selection process. 2. Having taken a chance and failed therein, it is not permissible for the petitioner to raise the grievance in that regard. A reference in this respect could be made in the Judgment of the Apex Court in the matter of Madan Lal and ors. Vs. State of J. & K. and ors. (1995) 3 S.C.C. 486. Hence, Writ Petition rejected. 2 WP 8774.2011 3. Insofar as claim of the petitioner for grant of permission to appear in the forthcoming examination is concerned, the petitioner would be at liberty to make a representation to the Chief Executive Officer, which will be considered in accordance with law. Sd/- Sd/- arp [M. T. JOSHI, J. ] [B. R. GAVAI, J.]