IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35534 of 2010 SAROJ SINGH @ SAROJ KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 08.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Petitioner is husband of the informant and there is allegation that he alongwith his other family members tried to cut the neck of informant with knife. Furthermore, the marriage had taken place in the year, 2001 and after that the Gauna was solemnized in the year, 2006 and when the informant went to her in-laws’ house, she was subjected to cruelty on account of non-fulfillment of illegal demand. Annexure-2, the Photostat copy of the injury report of informant, corroborates the allegation. Although there is mention in the aforesaid injury report that one old scar on mid of neck was found on the person of informant but Learned counsel for the informant produced order dated 31.03.2010 passed by learned Sessions Judge in B.P. No. 197A of 2010 and submitted the victim had appeared before learned Sessions Judge and the learned Sessions Judge had observed the sign of cut mark on the neck of informant. In the aforesaid circumstance, I do not feel it proper to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, 2 his prayer for bail in connection with Kudra P.S. Case No. 26 of 2010 stands rejected. However, if the trial is not concluded within four months, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)