1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 793 OF 2010 Smt. Bhagirathibai Madhavrao Patil .. Petitioner Versus 1. The Union of India and others .. Respondents Shri S. S. Choudhari, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri Alok Sharma, Standing Counsel for the Union of India. Smt. V. A. Shinde, A.G.P. for the Respondent/State. CORAM : A. P. DESHPANDE, AND N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 03RD MARCH, 2010. ORAL ORDER [Per A. P. DESHPANDE, J. ] : 01. By this petition, the petitioner questions legality, validity and propriety of an order communicated to the petitioner by the Collector dated 16th July, 2009. Perusal of the order reveals that the petitioner's husband who claimed to be a freedom fighter has been denied freedom fighters pension, as the petitioner's husband did not submit the proposal backed by the documents as has contemplated by Government Resolution dated 04th July, 2 1995. The petitioner's husband during his life time was communicated the decision of rejection of his claim for pension, however, the petitioner continued to pursue the matter and hence by communication dated 16.07.2009, the petitioner is informed that for non compliance of the requirement of Government Resolution dated 04.07.1995, the case of the petitioner's husband cannot be considered favourably. 02. It is undisputed that the proposal of the petitioner's husband was not favourably recommended by the Zilla Gaurav Samiti and hence, the proposal has to be dealt with in accordance with the Government Resolution dated 04.07.1995. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in case the petitioner is in position to comply with the requirement of Government Resolution, the petitioner's case may be directed to be considered in accordance with law. In the result though the petition stands dismissed summarily, we grant liberty to the petitioner to apply afresh in compliance of the Government Resolution dated 04.07.1995. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [A. P. DESHPANDE, J.] bsb/Mar.10