IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 5030 of 2008 Decided on: 04.10.2010 Mangu Ram and others. …Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner. : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate, for the petitioner. For the respondents No. 1 and 2. : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to passage of time. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge October 4, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?