Petitiorier ;;..^^B^ ,.AI%I:( ...-••''^^s;'^^". .£. •m /-ST) iNTHE.MIGMCiOyRyolGHH/^ISGA^H^^ ,'. .^•••W.P.fSMMo.'^.G'^ /2007:' -;z;l •:.l^:l:'l •.•''!:'^ :• ^ Smt.Ranjita Bai, W/o Bala; Rarn, ^Aged ab6ut:27 yegirs. R/o VillSge Hingnactill,i Gram Panchayat^ DHaur, T^l-isil . ;, • DhamdS, Distt.Duig (C.G;) '^^^^^^^ ^^ VERSUS yVi r* ^' o r^. •^ J^ ^»'; ^- ^ ys) :^ /5) ^ State of Chhattisgarh — Througli the Secretary, Panchayat & SbcialyWelfBre Depaftment/ DKS Bhavan, ^Rai(?uF THeCollector, Distt. Durg(C.G.) The Project Officer, Integrated GRild Develbpment, Bldck Dhamda,; vDisft. Durg<G.G.)' . ;,:1 • :•! ,'.. :,: :'; ,1^:.}-;/:,'?^; The Gram Panchayat, Dhaur, Tahsil; Dhamaa,Distt. Durg(C.G.), S The Seftretary, Gram Panchayat.Dhal.Ir, Tahsil Dhamda, Distt. Durg(G.G:) Smt. Sunita Sahu, VW6 Parmanand Sahu, Village HJngnadih, TaMsil Dhamda, Distt.Durg(C.Q.) ' WRI-TPETITIONUNDERARTICLE2260ETHE GONSTlTUTIONOFlNDIA <»;: i-TOHCGURTO^HHA^asSARH^TBILASPUR Writ Petition (s\ No.903 of 2007 Petitioher Smt. Ranjita Bai Versus Re^sondents StateofChhatt'isgairh&others SB: Hon'bleMr. JusticeSatish K. Agnihotri. J Ahr.P.R. Pa'tunkar, Advocate for'riiepetitioner. Mr. AjffyDwivedi, Panel lawyerfor therespOndentsNo.ttoS/State. ORbER (PoiSSed on this 15th doy of F^bruary,2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing for-the petitioner aibmits •Hiat the petitioner belongs to Scheduled Caste category cnd the respondent No. 6, who has been c^ointed <m ^e ppstof Aqnganvuadi Sahcyika, belongs to Other BoKkward Glass ca^oi^.^e area predomhiantly belongs to Scheduled Tribe community. Therefore. Ihe petitioner has preferential right for oppointment on the post of Aongonwadi Sahayika. 2. In view of the above stated aibmission made by learned counsel <()pearing for the petitionep, the Collector, Diirg is direc-ted to look into the atle9ation made by the petitioner and pass approprkite ot-der in accordance with Aangonwadi Scheme and law after affording an oppor-hjnity of hearing to +he petitioner, withina period of four weeks ft-om the date of receipt of a copy of this order.. 3. The writpetition is accordingly disposed of. No orderas to costs. Bablu Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge