IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 164 OF 2008 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 164 OF 2008 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 164 OF 2008 Shri Abdul Quayyum Abdul Quddus. ... Appellant. V/s. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and another. ... Respondents. Shiva D. Patil for the appellant. Ms.Geeta Joglekar for respondent No.1. T.V.Ganesh i/b. Ganesh & Co. for respondent No.2. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 16th July 2008. DATED: 16th July 2008. DATED: 16th July 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- . Heard learned counsel for the rival parties. 2. This revision is directed against the order dated 26th April, 2006 whereby by one line order the order dated 31st March, 2006 is stayed by the Judge of the City Civil Court, Mumbai. The said order is unsustainable for want of reasons. The learned Judge was expected to give reasons keeping in mind that his order is subject to challenge in appeal or revision. In absence of reasons, it is difficult for the higher Court to read the mind of the author of the order. The impugned order is passed in breach of natural justice as such liable to be set aside. 3. In the result, impugned order is set aside. Proceedings are remitted back to the trial Court for consideration afresh. It would be open for the applicant to take appropriate proceeding before the trial Court. 4. Appeal is disposed of in terms of this order with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)