IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7591 of 2011 RAJESH PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04 23.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner being the father of the husband is languishing in custody since 24.08.2010 in a case registered under Sections 304-B, 120-B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Admittedly the victim was killed within six months of the marriage. The accusation is of demand of dowry and torture. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that that the independent witnesses have supported the accusation against the husband. The postmortem report reflects strangulation. It is further submitted that the grand father has been granted regular bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 40908 of 2010 by this Court and husband is in custody. 2 Since there is general accusation against the entire in-laws family whereas the thrust of accusation is against the husband, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, in connection with Dulhin Bazar P.S. Case No. 120 of 2010. Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)