IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19001 of 2009 1. ARJUN SINGH 2. Dharmendra Kumar @ Tuntun Kumar Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 4/ 29.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. A mob was agitating, according to the F.I.R., in the reaction of suspension of one of the examinees, Dharmendra Kumar and pelting stones damaged some Police Jeep and Police Officials also received injuries. Firing is also alleged but injuring none. Nine of them were arrested and allowed bail. Petitioners though are named but several are unknown. So, according to the learned counsel, nature of allegation upon the petitioners does not justify refusal of anticipatory bail. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Arwal P.S. Case No. 26 of 2009, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Jehanabad subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)