THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.18209 of 2003 Dated: 17.01.2008 Between: Pajuru Shiva Kumari ..... PETITIONER AND The District Collector, Vijayawada, Krishna District and others. .....RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.18209 of 2003 O R D E R: This writ petition is filed seeking a mandamus declaring the alleged action of the third respondent-Mandal Revenue Officer in not initiating any action for evicting the fourth respondent from the site admeasuring Ac.0.3 cents situated in Survey No.52/2 of Pinapaka Village, as arbitrary and illegal. Even according to the petitioner, the land, in question, is a Government land. However, it is claimed that she was granted a patta long back and was put in possession by the 3rd respondent. It is alleged that while she was taking steps to construct a house in the said land, the fourth respondent had obstructed and highhandedly encroached upon the same. Immediately, she lodged a complaint with the police and also made a representation before respondents 1 to 3 requesting to take necessary action against the fourth respondent. Alleging that respondent 1 to 3 failed to take any action against the fourth respondent, this writ petition has been filed. In response to the rule nisi ordered, the Mandal Revenue Officer, G.Konduru Mandal, Krishna District filed a counter-affidavit stating that the land in question was classified as a tank poramboke and that neither the petitioner nor the fourth respondent was granted any patta in respect of the land in question. No reply affidavit has been filed by the petitioner nor any other material is placed before this Court to show that the land in question, has been assigned in favour of the petitioner at any point of time. Since no case is made out to show that any legal right acquired by the petitioner in respect of the land in question has been infringed, though no Mandamus can be issued directing the 3rd respondent to evict the 4th respondent, keeping in view that it is a Government land, it is made clear that this shall not preclude the 3rd respondent to take appropriate action in accordance with law. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________ G.ROHINI, J Date: 17.01.2008 va