FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2100 OF 2008 (Pranay Goradia & Anr.V/s.Abdul Razak Shaikh & Anr.) ___________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, apperances, Court's orders or Court's or Judge's directions and Registrar's orders orders ___________________________________________________________ Mr. Mahendra Agvekar h/f.Mr.Rajesh Gehani ,adv.for petitioners. Mr.A.H.Patel,adv. for respondent no.1. Mrs.A.A.Mane, APP for respondent/State CORAM: SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATED: 10 TH FEBRUARY, 2009. P.C. : 1. Heard counsel for both sides. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and respondent no.1 have tendered consent terms and requested that the petition be disposed off in terms of the consent terms. The consent terms are signed by only the counsel for the petitioners, respondent no.1 and the counsel for respondent no.1. The petitioners have not put their signatures on the consent terms. When this fact is brought to the notice of Mr.Agvekar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, he has made a categorical statement that he has a specific instruction to sign the consent terms and obtain orders for disposal of the petition in terms of the consent terms. In view of this categorical statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the consent terms are taken on record and marked `X'. The petition is disposed off in terms of the consent terms. [JUDGE]