IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 29 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 79 OF 2009 SHRI. SURESH PANDHARINATH K. SATOSKAR ... Applicant Versus SHRI. XARADA MANDIR THROUGH PRESIDENT AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. P. S. Lotlikar, Advocate for the applicant. Coram:- U. D. SALVI, J. Date:- 12th January, 2010 P.C. Heard. Perused application, affidavit in support and record. 2. The appeal against respondent no.1 came to be dismissed on account of failure of the appellant to comply with the Order dated 16.12.2009. The Order dated 16.12.2009 requires the appellant to take steps regarding service of notice on respondent no.1. It is contended that due to intervening vacation and oversight the steps remained to be taken in compliance of the Order dated 16/12/2009. Now an application is moved for taking such steps. Appeal against respondent no.1 is restored. 3. MCA no. 29/2010 is disposed off accordingly. U. D. SALVI, J. vn