IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8436 of 2008 MANIKANT JHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4 21.5.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. A categorical statement has been made on behalf of the respondents that payment to the extent the work done by the petitioner has already been made, his earnest money refunded and presently there is no obligation on the respondents. If the petitioner is not satisfied with the settlement of the payments then the Court will not be able to bail him out. He has remedy under common law. His prayer for payment of interest is also rejected because the delay of only two years is not unreasonable to warrant any decision of the interest. There are common ways where the cases of 15 to 20 years old are brought before this Court for payment. This writ application is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)