hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8777 OF 2009 Dr. Anil M. Ravetkar ... Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. A.M. Joshi for the Petitioner. Mr. V.S. Masurkar, Government Pleader for R. No. 1. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & D.B. BHOSALE, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 03, 2009 P.C. Rule. By consent heard forthwith. Notice waived on behalf of Respondent No. 1. In view of the order to be passed, notice on Respondent No. 2 dispensed with. The Petitioner earlier approached this court by way of Writ Petition No. 2390 of 2006 which came to be disposed of by order dated October 04, 2006 with a direction as set out in Paragraph 10 of the said judgment. The grievance of the Petitioner is that till date no decision has been taken on the same. Without going into the issue whether we should issue contempt notice, for the first instance we direct Respondent No. 1 to comply with the directions of this court in terms of Paragraph 10 as set out in the order passed in Writ Petition No. 2390 of 2006 within eight weeks from today. Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (D.B. BHOSALE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)