THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Contempt Case No.1515 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner filed W.P.No.25539 of 2008 for a writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in planning to diver the existing canal through Survey No.148, without removing the encroachments etc. His grievance is that the respondents have taken up work and the same would be in such a way as to effect his property. The writ petition was disposed of directing that the respondents shall verify the record before undertaking any work and issue notice to the petitioner, in case his property is needed for that purpose. This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondents have not implemented the orders of this Court and are taking steps in contravention of the same. Respondents 3 and 4 filed a counter affidavit denying the allegation of the petitioner. It is stated that as of now, no work of widening nala is undertaken and as and when the work is taken up, the petitioner would be given notice. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. The apprehension expressed by the petitioner is belied with the specific averment in the counter affidavit. It is clearly stated that in case, any land of the petitioner is needed for widening of the nala, he would be issued notice. The contempt case is accordingly closed. __________ 06.08.2010 THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Contempt Case No.1515 of 2009 DATE: 06.08.2010 JSU