iiii^S^^sa^&giji^i.^E^^^i'u'is.rfa^^^.^M^^.-^^ ^.^ru(^u»—.,B,.^a.asi>.^ i .-.^'•*^ ^' r IN THE HIG8. COURT OF JUI^fcATURE AT BILASPW CRMIb?5b I2Q11 PETITIONER Slngto VINAY KUMAR SAHU, AGED 26 YRg' S/0 GANGARAM SAHU • R/0 VILLAGE AUREDHI P.S. SIMGA DISTT. RAIPUR (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS (1) SMT. SUNITA BAI SAHU AGED 24 YEARS W/0 VINAY KUMAR SAHU KU. TIKESHWARI SAHU AGED 3 YEARS D/0 VINAY KUMAR SAHU (MINOR) THROUGH LEGAL GUARDIAN MOTHER SUNITA SAHU BOTH R/0 VILLAGE KATAI TAH. NAWAGARH, DISTT. DURG (C.G.) PETITION UNDER SECTION 4^2 OF CRIMINAL s^:-!l- ^.^- PROCEDURE CODE &(^4:-iv't'M iin-.R^v- ^!£o • •^-'^V v °A^rr< ^v-r The Petitioner respectFully begs to subniit as under :- \ • 'J»~»aM ^S~'S»IT_s^11!t*xff» VERSUS Vlnay Kumar Sahu Smt. Sunita Bai Sahu and another Shri Anand Kumar Gupta, counsel for the petitioner. fnfi_f5.i? s1*f^r» The present petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedur0 is dlrected against the order dated 16.03.2011 passed by revisional Court betow in Cnminal Revisi No.23/2010 dismissing the revlsion filed by the petitioner against order dated 12.05.2010 passed by Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Simga, Dis 2. Brief facts of the case are that respondent NQ.I is wife of she petitioner, whereas respondent No.2 is his daughter. In an appllcation filed t?y of Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of maintenance, it has been contended that after about a month of their marriage, respondent No,l was subjected to cruelty by the petitioner. During her pregnancy she was deserted by the petitloner. The respondents have prayed for grant of maintenance and after considering the entire evidence of the case, leamed Sria! Magistrate has awarded Rs,250/- per month as msintenance amount in favour of respondent No.l, whereas Rs.1,000/- per month has been awarded in favour of resooncient No fSs-f order was unsuccessfully challenged by the petittoner before the Reyjsional Court. By the impugned ordeo the revjsion has been dismissed. 3, I have perused the orders passed by the Courts below. I find no illegality in the order impugned which is a well reasoned orcier. Even otherwise looking to the present day cost of living; a very meager maintenance amount has been awarded by the Courts below and the same cannot be interfered with, The petition has no substance and is accordingly dismissed at the motion stage itself ^v^;^ Bini