IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No.9460 of 2011 Date of decision November 17, 2011 Mahinder Pal and others ....... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Pradeep P. Chahar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Kirti Singh, DAG., Haryana for the respondents. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?No 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?No K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. At the previous date of hearing, on the contentions raised by the counsel for the State that the petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 have since been married and therefore it is not possible to provide any financial assistance under the scheme of the State and having regard to the further contention that the person who was referred to as the grandfather of the orphan children had himself died on 6.3.2010, there was a direction to the petitioners' counsel to take appropriate instructions about the marital status of petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 and about the death of the grandfather. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks for further time. I do not think that there is any further need to keep the case pending with such facts that have been brought through the contentions of the State. 2. The writ petition is dismissed. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE November 17 , 2011 archana