IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.11289 of 2011 BETWEEN Ramaiah Goud. ... PETITIONER AND The Deputy Commissioner of Proh. & Excise, Govt. of AP, Nizamabad and three others. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. AMARNATH GOUD THODUPUNURI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court made the following order: ORDER: Heard both sides. 2. Though several reliefs are sought for in the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner restricts his relief now only to the extent of sending one sample of toddy obtained by the inspecting officials i.e. Prohibition and Excise Superintendent and Sub-Inspector and staff of Task Force, Hyderabad from TFT Ranjole, C.No.2 on 11.02.2011 for chemical analysis to an independent laboratory. 3. While the learned Government Pleader expresses no objection for the said relief being granted, she points out that the initial suspension of the licence further resulted in cancellation of the licence as well. 4. However, in view of the limited relief sought for by the petitioner, I see no reason to deny the said relief to the petitioner. The respondents shall send the subject sample to the fourth respondent i.e. A.P. State Food Laboratory, Nacharam, Hyderabad subject to payment of requisite charges by the petitioner. The fourth respondent laboratory, on receipt of the sample, shall conduct chemical analysis thereof and send a report to the second respondent. The writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J August 25, 2011 Note: Furnish C.C. of the order by 27.08.2011 (B/o) DSK