IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15752 of 2010 1. GAURI SHANKAR BHAGAT S/O SHIV PUJAN BHAGAT R/O VILL.- BATSAR BAZAR, P.O.- BATSAR, P.S.- DHURAIYA, DISTT.- BANKA Versus 1. MOST. CHINTA MANI DEVI W/O LATE SHIV PUJAN BHAGAT R/O VILL.- BATSAR BAZAR, P.O.- BATSAR, P.S.- DHURAIYA, DISTT.- BANKA 2. GYATRI DEVI W/O SHAMBHU BHAGAT R/O VILL.- CHANDPUR, P.O. & P.S.- JAGDISHPUR, DISTT.- BHAGALPUR 3. ASHA DEVI W/O OM PRAKASH BHAGAT R/O VILL.- SHAHPUR BELDIHA, P.S.- MAHGAMA, DISTT.- GODDA 4. RANI KUMARI MINOR D/O LATE SHIV PUJAN BHAGAT, GUARDIAN AND NEXT FRIEND OF THEIR MOTHER MOST. CHINTAMANI DEVI R/O VILL.- BATSAR BAZAR, P.O.- BATSAR, P.S.- DHURAIYA, DISTT.- BANKA 5. REKHA KUMARI MINOR D/O LATE SHIV PUJAN BHAGAT, GUARDIAN AND NEXT FRIEND OF THEIR MOTHER MOST. CHINTAMANI DEVI R/O VILL.- BATSAR BAZAR, P.O.- BATSAR, P.S.- DHURAIYA, DISTT.- BANKA 6. PUNAM KUMARI MINOR D/O LATE SHIV PUJAN BHAGAT, GUARDIAN AND NEXT FRIEND OF THEIR MOTHER MOST. CHINTAMANI DEVI R/O VILL.- BATSAR BAZAR, P.O.- BATSAR, P.S.- DHURAIYA, DISTT.- BANKA 7. RAMADHAR BHAGAT S/O SHIV PUJAN BHAGAT R/O VILL.- BATSAR BAZAR, P.O.- BATSAR, P.S.- DHURAIYA, DISTT.- BANKA 8. BINDO DEVI W/O GANGA BHAGAT R/O VILL.- BARIA, P.O. & P.S.- BARIA, DISTT.- SAHEBGANJ 9. JANKI DEVI W/O BRIJ BIHARI BHAGAT R/O VILL.- SHRIPUR, P.O.- SHRIPUR, P.S.- BARIARPUR, DISTT.- GODDA 10. PAPPU MINOR S/O RAMADHAR BHAGAT THROUGH RAMADHAR BHAGAT GUARDIAN AND NEXT FRIEND 11. SONI KUMARI MINOR D/O RAMADHAR BHAGAT THROUGH RAMADHAR BHAGAT GUARDIAN AND NEXT FRIEND 12. MUNNA MINOR S/O GAURI SHANKAR BHAGAT GUARDIAN AND NEXT FRIEND OF HIS FTHER GAURI SHANKAR BHAGAT R/O VILL.- BATSAR BAZAR, P.O.- BATSAR, P.S.- DHURAIYA, DISTT.- BANKA ----------- 2/ 07/04/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is stated to be the defendant in partition suit No.98/97. He is aggrieved by the order dated 25.1.2010 closing his evidence. If the fact that the suit has remained pending since 1997 was not enough to persuade this Court not to interfere with the impugned order dated 29.7.2010, 2 the detailed recitals in the impugned order of the indulgence granted to him earlier on the same question, taken advantage of on more than one date to keep the suit pending, satisfies the Court that the present is not a fit case for exercising supervisory powers under Article-227 of the Constitution of India to further prolong the suit on the submission made that in the interests of justice the petitioner be granted one opportunity. The interest of justice requires that this Court does not interfere with the impugned order. The writ application stands dismissed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)