S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2902/2008 Baljeet Singh Vs. The Addl.District Judge, Raisinghnagar & Ors Date of order : 10th July, 2008 PRESENT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. Trilok Joshi for the petitioner. --------- 1. Heard learned counsel. 2. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 15.1.2008 passed by learned Addl. District Judge, Raisinghnagar rejecting the revision against the order dated 20.4.2004 passed by the learned trial court rejecting the application for amendment in the written statement under Order 6 Rule 17 C.P.C. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the amendment would have allowed and opportunity to the defendant to produce the books of accounts maintained in the regular course of business which would have shown that he had not taken advance in question for plaintiff. He has produced the original written statement filed by the defendant as Annexure 3. A bare perusal of written statement clearly shows that the defendant has denied any transaction of advance and execution of promissory note and, therefore, this is sufficient pleadings on the part of the defendant and no further amendment was considered necessary by the learned trial court and the revisional court below. 4. Having considered the submissions of the learned counsel and after perusal of the record, this court finds no ground to interfere in the impugned order under supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 5. The writ petition is found to be devoid of merit, the same is accordingly, dismissed. Copy of this order be sent to respondent No.3 plaintiff. [ DR. VINEET KOTHARI ], J. item No.4 babulal/-