1 FARAD CONSTITUTION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4919/2009 (Sou.Malti Rajesh Jawalkar and another ..vs.. The Collector and other) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM:- B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE:- NOVEMBER 12, 2009 Heard learned Advocate Shri Dhatrak for petitioner. Learned AGP for respondent No.1. Learned counsel for petitioner states that documents have been allowed to be produced for further cross-examination of the petitioner. It is apparent that procedure contemplated by Rule 6 (4) of the Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Rules, 1987 will not apply when documents are sought to be produced to contradict the witness. Though, the application seeking leave for that purpose was filed, it is clear that, that application was also not necessary. I am, therefore, not inclined to interfere in the matter at this stage. The fact that there is dispute in relation to those documents is, therefore, not very relevant. 2 Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed. However, liberty to petitioner to challenge the impugned order dated 07/11/2009 after final adjudication of the matter. No order as to costs. JUDGE Diwale.