Crl. Misc. No. M-36883 of 2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-36883 of 2010 Date of Decision: March 8, 2011 Sarabjit Singh …..Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.P.S. Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Garg, Addl. A.G., Punjab. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Heard. The petitioner has inter-alia argued that unnecessary delay is being caused by the prosecution agency to complete the evidence. It has also been submitted that an application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. filed by the prosecution agency is pending since September 2010. On account of the delay caused, a prayer has been made for grant of bail. Crl. Misc. No. M-36883 of 2010 [2] After hearing counsel for the petitioner, I am of the pinion that no doubt, the delay is being caused but at the same time, the provisions of Section 113-A of the Evidence Act cannot be ignored while considering the plea for delay. Disposed of as withdrawn at this stage expecting that the trial Court will expeditiously decide the application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. by next date of hearing and concluding the trial expeditiously. March 8, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE