IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-16106 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 01.06.2011 M/s. Shree Balaji Timber Traders and another .... Petitioners Versus M/s. Shivam Traders ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present : Mr. Kapil Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? RITU BAHRI J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the complaint (Annexure P-2) bearing Complaint No. 68 dated 14.1.2011 under Section 138/142 of Negotiable Instruments Act and under Section 420 IPC and summoning order dated 14.1.2011 (Annexure P-4) passed by JMIC Yamuna Nagar under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Petitioners have been summoned to face trial under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that after cheque was dishonored, the legal notice was sent but the accused did not receive the said legal notice. There is non-compliance of Section 138 of Negotiable Instrucments Act. This argument will not help the petitioners as legal notice was sent through Registered A.D. and it is not the only case of the Crl. Misc. No. M-16106 of 2011 (O&M) 2 petitioners that it was sent on a wrong address. No grounds. Dismissed. (RITU BAHRI) 01.06.2011 JUDGE reena