IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.4234 of 2010 MOST. SATYA BHAMA DEVI & ORS. Versus JANARDAN MAHTO ----------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Singh 2, Advocate ---- 3 09.03.2011 This application has been filed for restoration of Second Appeal No. 278 of 2009, which stood dismissed for non compliance of order dated 21.6.2010. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the certified copy of trial court judgment and certified copy of decree under appeal, which were wanting, by mistake had been filed in S.A. No. 276 of 2009 within the period granted for by order dated 21.6.2010. However, by mistake suit and appeal value could not be entered for rectification of defect no. (C). In above view the mater, the period of compliance of order dated 21.6.2010 is extended till 23rd March, 2011. It is made clear that if the certified copy of the trial court as well as the certified copy of decree under appeal, which were required to be filed in S.A. No. 278 of 2009 had been filed in S.A. No. 276 of 2 2009, the same should be attached with this file and would be deemed to be sufficient compliance. On being satisfied with the sufficiency of reasons mentioned in this application for omission on part of the petitioners, the date of compliance of order dated 21.6.2010 is extended till 23.03.2011 and the Second Appeal No. 278 of 2009 is restored to its original file and number subject to the condition that the order dated 21.6.2010 has fully been complied by 23.03.2011. Accordingly, this application stands allowed. Spd/- ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)