IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 8 OF 2010 MR. SIMAO MORAES ... Petitioner Versus GOVIND SITARAM PATKAR (DECEASED) THROUGH LR'S ... Respondent Shri J. Godinho, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri M. S. Usgaonkar, Senior Advocate with Ms. Amira A. Razaq, Advocate for the Respondents. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 12th August, 2010 P.C.:- Heard. This Writ Petition is directed against Order dated 2-12-2009 of the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Quepem. Admittedly, there is no challenge to Order dated 25-8-2009 by which the Petitioner as plaintiff was directed to restore possession of the suit premises to the Defendants on or before 31-8-2009. Shri J. Godinho, learned Counsel on behalf of the Petitioner submits that there is no proper identification of the veranda or part of which the Petitioner is required to restore to Defendant No.1. Shri Godinho further submits that the pleadings of para 6 of the plaint which are incorporated in para 3 of the impugned Order dated 2-12-2009 were not admitted by Defendant No.1. However, Shri M. S. Usgaonkar, learned Senior Counsel on behalf of Defendant No.1 submits that the plaintiff is required to restore that part of the veranda which was converted into a room by wooden planks, and which was identified on the sketch Exh.B as room no.3. Learned Senior Counsel submits that the Petitioner is required to restore the possession of the said room to the Defendants. Since the Defendants have now accepted that the converted veranda into a room is sufficiently identified on the sketch and marked as room no.3, no purpose can be served by directing an inquiry as regards the identity of the room to be restored to Defendant No.1. Therefore, I find there is no merit in this Writ Petition, and accordingly the same is disposed off. Parties to appear before the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Quepem on 30-8-2010 at 10.00 a.m. for further proceedings. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.