IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P. No. 687 of 2009(O&M) Date of Decision : April 15, 2009 Lakhwinder Kaur ....Petitioner Versus Anil Gupta .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.S. MANN Present : Mr. Mansul Ali, Advocate and Mr. H.S.Deol, Advocate for the petitioner. T.P.S. MANN, J. (Oral) Learned counsel contends that against the violation committed by the respondent of the undertaking/order dated 2.8.2008, the petitioner has filed an application under Order XXXIX Rule 2-A C.P.C. (Annexure P-5) but the said application is not being decided and is being taken up for consideration along with the main suit. The petitioner would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the trial Court to consider and dispose of the aforementioned application within a particular time frame. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the view that a direction can be issued to the trial Court to consider and dispose of the application filed by the petitioner under Order XXXIX Rule 2-A C.P.C., without waiting for the conclusion of the trial of the suit. Accordingly, the C.O.C.P. No. 687 of 2009 -2- petition is disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to consider and dispose of the application under Order XXXIX Rule 2-A C.P.C.(Annexure P-5) filed by the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order. ( T.P.S. MANN ) April 15, 2009 JUDGE ajay-1