AB 2209/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE A.K. GOSWAMI Heard Mr. M. Hussian, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr . Z. Kamar, learned Additional P.P. for the State. The petitioner’s anticipatory bail application was rejected along with H armuj Ali, S/o Jadu Miah and Mandal Khan, @ Mangal Khan, S/o Late Gafur Khan a fter perusal of the case diary by an order dated 26-05-2011 in A.B. No. 1218 of 2011. The name of the petitioner was spelt in A.B. No. 1218 of 2011 as Md.Mahir udin @ Mahirudin Ahmed, S/o Md. Rames Ali. The learned counsel for the petitione r submits that the accused in the case is one Md. Mahuruddin and not him. In th e cause title of the present application, the petitioner’s name is spelt as Moh ir Uddin @ Mohir Uddin Ahmed. I have perused the case diary. Mr. Z. Kamar, learned Additional P.P. submits that the name Mohir Uddin or Mahi ruddin does not appear in the case diary but name of Md. Mahuruddin appears in t he case diary. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the case dia ry, I am inclined to grant the privilege of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, it is provided that in the event arrest of the petitioner, he shal l be released on bail on furnishing a bond Rs. 20,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority. It is also directed that the petitioner shall report to the Investigation Officer of this case withi n a period of seven days from today and shall also continuously report to him fo r a period of two months at an interval of 15 days.. With the above direction, bail application stands disposed of.