In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 7292 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: November 10, 2010 Trilok Chand Taneja and another ---Petitioners versus Bindia Woharra @ Bindia and another ---Respondents Coram: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH *** Present: Mr.Amit Jhanji, Advocate, for the petitioners *** GURDEV SINGH, J. Heard. The petitioners, Trilok Chand Taneja and Arti Taneja, who were impleaded as defendants No. 2 and 3 in the suit filed by Bindia Woharra @ Bindia-respondents No. 1, and who had made counter claim in that suit, have filed the present revision petition under Article 227 of the constitution of India for issuing a direction to the trial court to decide the said suit expeditiously and preferably within time bound period. A perusal of the proceeding orders, copies of which have been placed on the record, shows that the suit was dismissed in default, which was subsequently ordered to be restored and the records were received by the Trial Court from the Record Room on 21.5.2010. It cannot be said that Civil Revision No. 7292 of 2010(O&M) -2- there is any lethargy on the part of the Trial Court. No such direction can be issued in view of the Case Flow Management Rules, already framed by this Court. Revision petition is dismissed accordingly. (GURDEV SINGH) JUDGE November 10, 2010 PARAMJIT