IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 19TH MARCH 2010 / 28TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 7234 of 2010(D) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- S.JAYADEV, SON OF K.SUNDARESAN, POOMADHURAVILAKOM, PACHALLOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-27. BY ADV. SRI.S.EASWARAN SRI.P.MURALEEDHARAN (IRIMPANAM) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SOUTHERN RAILWAY, REPRESENTED BY THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE STATION MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, ALWAYE. BY STANDING COUNSEL SHRI N.B.SUNILNATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.7234 OF 2010 ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 19th DAY OF MARCH, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner was appointed on 7.12.2007 to manage the work of handling parcel in Alwaye Railway Station. It is averred in the Writ Petition that pursuant to the same, the 3rd respondent issued identity cards to the petitioner as well as 10 members of staff under him. Exhibits P1(a) to (g) are the copies of the identity cards. 2. The matter was going on smoothly and when one Station Manager Shri Rahim was appointed, he restrained the petitioner from entering into the Station and accordingly there arose some dispute in respect of that matter. The main prayer in the Writ Petition is for a direction to the 3rd respondent to grant the petitioner payment of the work of handling parcel in Alwaye Railway Station with effect from 7.12.2007 at the rate of Rs.10 per ton. The further prayer is to direct the respondents to furnish the petitioner his work experience certificate as expeditiously as possible. W.P.(C)No.7234/10 -2- 3. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. It is submitted that the 2nd respondent will consider Exhibit P4 after verifying the records maintained in the Office concerned and then take steps in the matter. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Exhibit P3 may also be directed to be considered by the 2nd respondent while considering Exhibit P4 representation. Exhibit P3 is a reply given by the Additional Divisional Railway and Appellate Authority. Therefore the same also will be considered by the 2nd respondent. The petitioner can also appear before the 2nd respondent and place all the details available to him in that regard. Appropriate action will be finalised within a period of two months. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE dsn