1 wp 9585.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9585 OF 2011 Dr. Sunil Rambhau Bhangale .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Tiwari, Advocate h/f Shri N. L. Choudhari, Advocate for the Petitioner. Smt. R. K. Ladda, A.G.P. for the Respondent/State. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 12TH DECEMBER, 2011. PER COURT : . Heard Shri Tiwari, the learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned counsel submits that the petitioner had challenged the auditors report before the Joint Registrar. Though the same is pending an order was passed for an enquiry U/sec. 88 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. The enquiry would not have been ordered during pendency of said revision. The learned counsel further contends that when legality of the auditors report itself is subject matter of dispute and the same has not 2 wp 9585.11 attained finality, the enquiry U/Sec. 88 pursuant to the said auditors report could not have been initiated. 2. In the impugned order only an enquiry has been directed to be conducted against the petitioner. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that revision is subjudiced before the Joint Registrar. The petitioner is at liberty to obtain appropriate orders from the Joint Registrar on its own merits. The petitioner can file application for appropriate orders in the said pending revision which application can be decided on its own merits. 3. The Joint Registrar shall decide the revision filed by the petitioner challenging the auditors report within a period of two (2) months from today. 4. The writ petition accordingly is dismissed, however, with no order as to costs. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/Dec. 11