v 'f- IN ffiE HIGH CXIURT OF GHHATCTSGAflH AT BILASPUR (G.G.) S.3 CTVIL BSVISXON N0. ,Jj_'t^__/2003 PETZCTONERS; DECRES HOLDERS .^••"^i^V .^:y ^y.^ ^^"" •^•^ ^^'" *»'*•' vs aESp0ND2NTS s w5GSfma'£ ^EB'SO&S 1. Qhai'tEam s/o Jiwanlal SatDanii, 2. Dani @ Chaitu s/o Late Jagat ram Sa'tnami i'3. Hirawan s/o Late Jagat-ram Sataami 4. Smt. Bitawan Bai w/o Late Hira Lal Satnaml 5.. Smt. Yashoda Bai d/o Late Hira ^' ' . Iial Sa'fcnaml, aged 19 years Kamta Prasad a/Q I»ate Hiralal Satnaltii All B/o vill. JarodhaSEati 'Ehania A-arang Tah. & Distfe. Baipur, (G.S.) 1. Rupu s/o Budharu Saha. aged 5Q Vs '2'. Somna'th s/o Budhgru Sahu, aged 50 years .: ,. jogiram s/o Late Jagatpal | • satnami . All R/o vill. Jarodha P.S. Aaraag >Sh. & Distt. Raipur (C.G.) , :.\ GEVXIi REVISION V/S'llS OP aEVIt PM) CgW RB GQDE. liil 'i\ YT_T?P- -^j.-i-l^,.— .0 ! ^^iwfnw '^^3T^T sS^fri^ Sahu 'S^ •*fWWi<, (9V\WW, fsldiy^ ...^,.....1!9:.. sn^I 'T^q; (iy{^i{t}) ^nwdftg aii^i S.B, HQn'ble_SbrLJystice N.K. Aaarwal 11,03.2010 Shri Abhay Tiwari, Advocat^ forpetitioners. 1£fe The instant revision is di] 23.01.2003, passed by IVth Raipur, in Execution Case No. the appiication preferred by the) profit during pendency of ex|i dismissed by thei Executing has not been granted by the couiji Coilrt Having heard the counsel having perused the order impugn|ec itlegality or irr^ularity in the orcjer Court cannot go behind the decr^e. In wew of above, the liable to be and is hereby dismis^ed cbf^fet^T *ff*(f?f ^f ^^fl '^PST^K ^affOTsn^Sl lij'ected against the order dated ^tdditional Civil Judge, Class I, Qp-ftJQO whereby and whereunder petitionere fpr grant of mesne ><|ecution proceeding has been on the ground that the same in decree. jappearing for the petitioners and |ed, 1 do not find any jurisdicttonal It is trite law that Executing revi^ion being devoid of substance is No order asto costs. Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge y