1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7046 OF 2010 Varsha d/o Sitaram Vavale, Age 32 years, Occ. Unemployed, R/o C/o Hemant Vishwas Sawkar, API Corner, Vivek Nagar, Plot No.18, N-2, CIDCO, Aurangabad. ... PETITIONER VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Medical Education & Drugs Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai. 2. The Director of Medical Education & Research, St. George’s Hospital Compound, Government Dental College Building, 4th Floor, Near C.S.T., Mumbai - 1. ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri V.P. Golewar, Advocate for the petitione r Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, A.G.P. for respondents ..... CORAM: P.V. HARDAS & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED: 5th August, 2010 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER N.D. DESHPANDE, J.): 1. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission 2 2. The petitioner by this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, prays for directing respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 12.2.2010. Since the petitioner has only prayed for the aforesaid relief, we are inclined to decide this petition finally at this stage. 3. Since the representation is said to be pending, which has been made purusant to the reliefs granted to others, on account of judicial orders passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.6412/2006 and Writ Petition No.6372/2006, we allow this petition and direct the respondent No.2 to decide the said representation, if pending, in accordance with law and communicate the decision thereon to the petitioner. 4. Rule is thus made absolute on the above terms with no order as to costs. (N.D. DESHPANDE, J.) (P.V. HARDAS, J.)