IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN FRIDAY, THE 15TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 26TH MAGHA 1929 SA.No. 967 of 2001(F) AS.69/1996 OF THE ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, KOTTAYAM OS.419/1992 OF MUNSIFF'S COURT, KANJIRAPPALLY APPELLANTS: APPELLANTS: PLAINTIFFS: 1. NAVEERU MEERA AHMED KANNU MUTHU, PUTHUPARAMBIL HOUSE (PADA HOUSE), PUTHENCHANDA BHAGOM, ERUMELY NORTH VILLAGE.\ 2. MUTHU KANNU LATHEEF, S/O. -DO- -DO- BY ADV. SRI.NOBLE MATHEW RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS: DEFENDANTS: 1. NAVOORU MEERA PILLAPPA, PUTHUPARAMBIL HOUSE (PADA HOUSE), AMARAVATHY BHAGOM, ERUMELY NORTH VILLAGE. 2. NAVOORU MEERA ABDUL KHADER, PUTHUPARAMBIL, RESIDING AT 10-CENT CO,OLY, VANDANPATHAL BHAGOM, -DO- VILLAGE. 3. NAVOORU MEERA ISMAIL, PUTHUPARAMBIL (PADA HOUSE), PUTHENCHANTHA BHAGOM, -DO- VILLAGE. 4. NAVEERU MEERA ADIMA, PUTHUPARAMBIL (PADA HOUSE), INCHIYANI BHAGOM, EDAKKUNNAM VILLAGE. 5. NABEESA, W/O.SYED, PUTHUPPARAMBIL (PADA HOUSE) PUTHENCHANTHA BHAGOM, ERUMELY NORTH VILLAGE. 6. MAUSHAD, S/O.ABDUL KHADER, PUTHUPPARAMBIL (PADA HOUSE), RESIDING AT 10 CENT COLONY, VADANPATHAL, -DO- VILLAGE. 7. NASEER, BROTHER OF 6TH RESPONDENT, -DO- -DO- 8. P.A.PAREEDU KANNU BASHEER, PADA HOUSE, NEAR PUTHAVATHU IDAYATHI MADRASSA, CHANGANACHERRY TALUK. 9. THANKAMMA, W/O.KOCHAPPU, -DO- -DO- 10. KHADEEJA BEEVI, W/O.IBRAHIM, ILLATHUPARAMBIL, KANJIRAPPALLY PETTAI BHAGOM, KANJIRAPPALLY TALUK. 11. NAVOORU MEERA SYED MUHAMMED, PADA HOUSE, PUTHUPARAMBIL, CHANDANPATHAL KARA, ERUMELI NORTH VILLAGE. 12. NAVEERU MEERA NAVOORKANI, -DO- -DO- R2 TO R5, R11 AND R12 BY ADV. SRI.T.I.ABDUL SALAM THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ORDERS ON 15/2/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. -------------------------------------------- S.A. NO. 967 OF 2001 F and C.M.P.NO.2301 OF 2001 in S.A.NO.967 OF 2001 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th February, 2008 JUDGMENT As per order dated 29.1.2008, ten days' time was granted as last chance to cure the defects. It was also noticed that if the defects were not cured by that time, the Second Appeal will stand dismissed. The defects are not yet cured. There is no representation for the appellants. C.M.P.No.2301 of 2001, petition for condoning the delay of 154 days in filing the Second Appeal, is, therefore, dismissed for default. Consequent on the dismissal of the petition for condoning the delay in filing the Second Appeal, the Second Appeal is also dismissed for default. (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/ K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------- S.A.NO. 967 OF 2001 F JUDGMENT 15th February, 2008 -------------------------------------------