1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 11513 of 2008 Decided on: 23rd September, 2011. Brahma Nand .....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others .....Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. ______________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. A.K. Jaryal, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Challenge is on Annexure A-1, order. As per the order, LTC claim has been sought to be withdrawn on account of audit objection. What is the audit objection, has not been communicated to the petitioner. He has not been granted an opportunity to submit his version of the case. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of as follows. 2. Respondents No. 3 & 4 may communicate the audit objection to the petitioner within a period of six weeks. The same 2 shall be treated as a notice. Thereafter, it will be open to the petitioner to submit his reply to the same within a period of another one month. The said reply will be considered by the first respondent/competent authority within a period of another three months. Till the orders, as above, are passed, the interim order granted by the Tribunal will continue. 3. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 23rd September, 2011. (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (hl) Judge.