IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.3094 of 2010 Date of decision:- 01.02.2011 Mahesh Aggarwal ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Mr. D.N. Ganeriwala, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.S. Virk, DAG Haryana. RITU BAHRI J.(Oral) Custody certificate has been placed on record by State counsel. Criminal revision has already been admitted and counsel for the applicant-petitioner requests for suspension of sentence of the applicant- petitioner during the pendency of the revision-petition. Argues that the applicant-petitioner has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years with a fine of Rs.5000/- for commission of offence under Section 16(1)(a)(i) of PFA Act, 1954 and that the applicant-petitioner has already undergone more than two and a half months of sentence out of total awarded. Learned counsel for the State has not disputed these facts. The revision-petition is not likely to be heard in near future. Applicant-petitioner has already undergone more than two and a half months of rigorous imprisonment out of total two years rigorous imprisonment awarded. Hence, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the prayer of the applicant-petitioner is accepted and the remaining sentence of the applicant- petitioner is suspended during the pendency of the revision-petition. Bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Sonepat. February 01, 2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Vijay Asija JUDGE