In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh R. F. A No. 406 of 1991 (O&M) Date of decision : 15.12.2008 Shkuntla Devi and another ..... Appellants vs State of Punjab ..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: None for the appellants. Mr. Vivek Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Rajesh Bindal J. The landowners have filed the present appeal for enhancement of compensation for the acquisition of land. Briefly, the facts are that the State of Punjab acquired the land within the revenue estate of Village Saneulian vide notification dated 14.12.1982, issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act'), for construction of Sutlej Yamuna Link Canal. The Land Acquisition Collector assessed the market value of the land at Rs. 13,200/- per acre for chahi and Rs. 10,000/- per acre for Rauali/ Gair mumkin kind of land. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned court while relying upon an earlier award, Ex. A-1, enhanced the compensation to Rs. 45,000/- per acre for chahi and Rs. 24,000/- per acre for Rausli/ gair mumkin/ Dakar kind of land. Learned Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, submitted that claim made by the appellants/ in the present appeal is squarely covered by the Division Bench of this court in L. P. A. No. 49 of 1988 Sant Ram vs The State of Punjab and another, decided on 8.1.2002, whereby the compensation assessed by the learned court below was upheld. As the landowners have already been granted compensation for the acquired land which is in conformity with the Division judgment of this court in Santi Ram's case (supra), I do not find any merit in the present appeal. However, as the learned counsel for the appellants is not present, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. 15.12.2008 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge