IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN THURSDAY, THE 25TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 6TH PHALGUNA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 1517 of 2009(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.26091/2009 Dated 25/09/2998 .................... PETITIONER/ADDL.6TH RESPONDENT IN THE WPC -------------------------------------------------------- J.S.MAHESH, AGED 27 YEARS, S/O.JANARDHANAN PILLAI, CONVENOR, ACTION COUNCIL, KOTTUKUNNUMALA PROTECTION COUNCIL, RESIDING AT CHERIYIL HOUSE, GANDHI NAGAR, VAMANAPURAM (P.O), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN 695 606. BY ADV. SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J. RESPONDENTS/ 4TH RESPONDENT & PETITIONER IN THE WPC ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. SRI.BIJU.K., (AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SRI.ABDUL SALAM, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O.POOKUNJU, RESIDING AT KOCHULOICKAL HOUSE, MUKUNDAPURAM (P.O), CHAVARA, KOLLAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. T.B.REMANI FOR R1 ADV. SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.T.RAMPRASAD UNNI THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. --------------------------- Cont. Case (C) No. 1517 OF 2009 -------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T Smt. T.B.Remani, the learned Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent submits that as directed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruvananthapuram on 1.1.2010, the Tahsildar, Nedumangad Taluk has issued a stop memo dated 6.1.2010 directing the second respondent/writ petitioner to stop operating the quarry. Sri. T.Ramaprasad Unni, the learned counsel for the second respondent/writ petitioner is not in a position to state whether such a memo has been received. Sri. Elvin Peter, P.J., the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in such circumstances, this contempt case may be closed leaving open the right of the petitioner/ 6th respondent in the writ petition to bring the fact that a stop memo has been issued by the Tahsildar, Nedumangad Taluk on 6.1.2010 to the notice of the learned single Judge and seek appropriate variation of Annexure A1 order. Reserving liberty as above, this contempt case is closed. P.N.RAVINDRAN, (JUDGE) vps 2