IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.15030 of 2009 NARESH RAJAK Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 14.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code in Kursela P.S. case no. 23 of 1991 corresponding to G.R. No. 570 of 1991. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the First Information Report and he did not know about the pendency of this case, as no notice was issued. He further submits that he has received instruction that one of the co-accused has been acquitted. It would appear from the order of the learned trial court that the original case diary is not available. In this respect the trial court has sought cooperation from the lawyers of both sides to make available a copy of the case diary, if they are having the same. It appears from the order-sheet that petitioner has been shown absconder on 22.03.1995. Having considered the submission of the counsel as well as facts of this case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner for the present. Accordingly, prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to take all steps to expedite the trial. The District Judge, Katihar would also render all help so that the records could be traced and made available to trial court. Uday/ (S. P. Singh, J.)