IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP (T) No. 16258 of 2008 Decided on: 18.7.2011 Dharam Chand and another …Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioners : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous with the passage of time. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed having become infructuous. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge July 18, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?