IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATI’ISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. 9 NU?532’[201Q ”Smt. Pirty Paikara, wife bf Shindhu Sai Paikara, aged about 23 years, resident of village Pagurabahar Tahsil Farsabahar, District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh). PETITIONER VERSUS 1.6 State of Chhattisgarh through Collector Jashpur, District Jashpur (Chhatti'sgarh). RESPONDENTS District Mahiia Ayam Bal Vikas Karyakram Adhikari Jashpur (C.G.) Pariyojna Adhikari (Project Officer) Bai Vikas ’ Pariyojna Farsabahar, District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh). .Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Farsabahar, District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh). \ ' Smt. Sunita Bai, wife of Shyam Kumar Sai, > aged about 29 years, Kawar by caste, resident of village ' Ganjhutoia, " Gram Panchayat Pagurabahar,Tahsil Farsabahar, District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh). WRIT PEIITION unbeg ARncLE 2;§/227 or THE CON$TITUTION OF LNDIA- 1 . PARTICULARS OF THE PEITIONER. As stated above in the cause title. C@> URT OF CHHATI'ISGARH : BILASPUR ,WRIT PETITION (S! NO.2532 OF 2010 (Wnt Petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Slngle Bench Hon ble Shri Satlsh K Agmhotn J Present :— Shri J.S. Baralk, counsel for the petitioner. Shri N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyer fOr the State. Shri P.K. Patel, counsel forthe respondent No.5. - ORDER (O L) ~ (Passed on thls 315‘ day of March 201 1) Heard learned Counsel for the parties. The instant petition is against the order dated 23-3-2010 (Annexure — P/1) passed by the Additional Collector, Jashpur, under the provisions of the phhattisgarh Panchayat Raj Aclhiniyam, 1993. 3. Statutory appeal is maintainable against the order passed by the Additional Collector to the Director (Panchayat) in View of the 1 ~prOViSions of Rule 3 (b) of the Chhattisgarh Panchayats (Appeal and ReVI3ion) Rules, 1995. 4. Under the aforesaid circumstances, learned counsel'appearing for the“petitionevr submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to take reocurse to- statutory forum, which is available under the provisions of law, to which learned counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection 5. V Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of With the aforesaid observations Since the petitioner is pursumg the remedy before this Court, the limitation for preferring the appeal before the Director I (panchayat) may be reckoned from today. / I ' \ Sdl- Gown \ sATISH K “mo .é O f PETITIONER I ' Smt. ‘Pirty Paikara Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattlsgarh &