IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 18902 of 2003 Between: 1 P. Bikshapathi S/.o late P. Beerappa, R/o Puppalguda Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Raqnga Reddy District 2 P. Srisailam s/o late P. Bheerappa R/o Puppalguda village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 3 P. Padma rao s/o late P. Beerappa R/o Puppalguda Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Rangareddy District 4 P. Gopal s/o Shivaraj R/o Puppalguda village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division, Attapur, Ranga Reddy District 3 Chakali Ramchander s/o Late Bhavani, R/O PUPPALGUDA VILLAGE, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 4 Chakali Suresh S/o Late Bhavani R/o Puppalguda village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Rangareddy District 5 Chakali Narsing Rao s/o Late Bhavani, R/o Puppalguda Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Rangareddy District .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners:MR. K.GOVARDHAN REDDY FOR MR.C.R.PRATAP REDDY The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is therefore prayed that this Honourable Court may be pleased to issue Writ, order or direction preferably in the nature of writ of Certiorari quashing the order of the 1st respondent dated 19-7- 2003 in File No. F1/426/2001 arising out of the order dated 2-1- 1999 in File No. L/4053/98 on the file of the 2nd respondent declaring the same based on false and forged application statements of the respondents 3 to 5 have no locus standi to claim any Occupancy Right Certificate under A.P. (TA) Abolition of Inams Act.” Sri K.Govardhan Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri K.G.Krishna Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioners sought for permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition as the matter is settled outside the Court. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as withdrawn, WPMP.No.4457 of 2006 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 9th JULY, 2008. kvni