1 ca2246.04 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2246 OF 2004 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 698 OF 1995 [Maruti Sonawane & Ors. vs. Prakash Kulkarni & Anr.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. N.N. Shinde, Advocate for applicants. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 19TH JULY, 2011 PER COURT : Heard learned Counsel for the applicants. Though respondent No.1 is duly served, none appeared for him. So far respondent No.2 is concerned, learned Counsel for the applicants submits that he is a formal party. He submits that, he has not claimed any relief against respondent No.2. 2. In that view of the matter, and upon 2 ca2246.04 perusal of the contents of the application and in particular Para-5 and 6, I am satisfied that the sufficient cause has been disclosed so as to condone the delay. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (A) and (B) and stands disposed of. The order dated 01-02-1999 dismissing the C.R.A. No. 698/1995 in default is recalled. C.R.A. No. 698 of 1995 is restored to its original file. 4. C.R.A. No. 698/1995 be included in final hearing list to be prepared for second week of August 2011. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/JUL11