IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38875 of 2010 JAWAHAR SAH S/O SRI JAGDIP SAH……….PETITIONER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 19.11.2010. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Receiving of Rs.26,000/-(twenty six thousand only) in name of appointment of Maha Dalit Sikchhak and abuse in name of informant’s caste is denied and doubted on the ground that abuse, if any, was given in night in presence of non means not in public view and for receiving of Rs.26,000/- may be received by Mukhiya; petitioner is her husband and if money is paid for appointment that also is an offence that should be cared while accusationing anyone including petitioner and his wife and once it comes that informant himself is an accused, his statement can only be taken as confession basing which refusal of anticipatory bail is not justified. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with Patory P. S. Case No.35 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.)