XI-HG—78 ^ ?^T ^II^Krl^, ^tll^J^Ko, f®i<y1KH^< —^J..^..y......s:^j..(/.............- "w^rr (h*<lcb " " ^" "^ 200 s> ^IRt?TT[^^' (1°i^^) ^TT^T ^RT f<^i<=b ^sn ^TT^T'^RT^ ^^R^rf^T3TI^T Petitioner Pradtiaa B.K. about 53 Basna, Mahasamhind Versus Respondents 1. State ofl Secretar^j Govemjad Mantrala^ 2. 3. 4. The Coifamissioner Directorate of PubUc Instructic|ns, Chhattisgarh Raipur (CG) Education Officer, Mahasainund Instoructidns Distrfict The (CG) The Blocll: Mahasamlund S.B. Hon'ble Shri Dhireadra Mishral. 22.9.2008 Shri Imtiaz Ali, comisel tbr tjtie Snit. Sunita Jaia, PL This is fhe second round of) iaipugned his toraasfer order of (S) No.3569/08, which was dispo^ 17t11 July, 2008 with Mberty to thej before fhe concemed auflioritles, | ia accordan.ee with law wifhia a receipt of fhe reprcsentatiou, ^i^t<n^i ^THcff ^ 'fexst ^fa^K ^'^tRTH'ST^T S/o Late Pavitra Pradhaa, Aged ycars, Accountaiit, Education Ofi&cc ?/o Basna, Tahsil-Basna, Distt. (CG) Chhattisgarh, Through - The School Education Department, ;nt of Chhattisgarh, DKS Bhawan, a, Raipiir, District: Raipur (CG) Education OfEicer, Basna, Distdct : (CG) for fhej respond petitioner. spondents/ State. I Utigation. EarUer, the petitioner had A^inexure P/3 by way ofWrit Petition 3>ed of by this Court vide order dated jpetitioner to submit a representation |who, ia tum, shall decide the saiae )eriod of two weeks froia the date of ^owever, the representation of fhe -f- XI-HG—78 ~3^T ^I^Krl^, ^tll^^Ko, f^Crll<rl^< ^^^./s.u.......^ *ii*icti «»*ii<s?» " " "^ ^ 200% ^?TTT^^ (^oif^^r) 3TI^T ^FT R^jch ?T8H 311^1 $t)*ll<=^ ^^TW^ftn ^T?^?I ^- cbi^f<li<fl<i Ni^cnl*'? f^st <f^i^i< ^^riTR^n^T ^ h jpetitioner has also been disniis |Annexure P/l, ed vide order dated 11.9.2008 of Leanied counsel for fhfc |representation has been disin^ssed |opportunity of hearing. petitioner subraits that his wifhout afforduig him aii beeb Haviag heard learaed couns^ |the fact fliat fhe petitioner has lEducation Ofiicer, Basua to |Chhaporadeeh, wifhia fhe saine lopiaion fhat no uiterference is Aunexure P/1 ui exercise of wri^ deserves to be disioissed at accordiagly, disiaissed. [1 for fhe petitioner, havtag regard to traiisferred froia fhe office ofBlock povt. Higher Secondaiy School, pistdct-Mahasainund, I am of the c^Iled for ui fhe iaipugned order of jurisdictiou. The mstaat petition f|ie admission stage itself and is Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge +