IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13073 of 2010 JAI RAM YADAV S/O LATE RAGHUVEER YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 13.8.2010 The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 6.10.2009 passed in Case No. 2256/09 by learned Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul at Motihari by which he has refused to release the truck of the petitioner as well as the order dated 10.3.2010 passed in Cr. Revision No. 347/09 by the learned District and Sessions Judge, East Champaran at Motihari by which he dismissed the revision. On going through the impugned orders, I find that since the courts below were not satisfied that the documents produced on behalf of the accused persons, the vehicle in question was not released in their favour. I find no illegality in the matter but a direction is given to the Trial Court to call for a report from the D.T.O. North 24 Pargana with regard to the ownership of the vehicle and pass such orders as may be deemed fit in the facts of the case. The application with this observation is disposed off. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )