0‘??o’c//q @v $mg‘9 gem“ IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.p. (s1 No.,21.%$’0F 201 1 LP. Markam, aged about 8 years, S/o Late Shri Shobharam Markam, Occupation — Lecturer, District Institute of Education and Training, (DIET) District Janjgir-Champa .(C.G.). PETITIONERS B.L. Kanwar, aged about 57 years, S/o Late Shri P.L. Kanwar, Occupation — Lecturer, Adarsh Higher Secondary School, Sakti,. ; Tahsil Sakti, District: Janjgir— ,i Champa (C.G.). ' 3. M.S. Kanwar, aged about 55 years, S/o Late Shri S. Kanwar, Occupation ~ Lecturer, Government Higher Secondary School, Changori, Block — Akaltara, Tahsil Akaltara, District: Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). VERSUS of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, School Education Department, . D.K.S. Bhavan Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). Director, Public Instructions (D.P.I.) Pensionbada, Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE LIKE NATURE. -'- ‘ wey RESPONDENTS :— l. / State W l) PARTICULAR OF THE PETITIONERS:- As given above in the cause title. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS1» As given above in the cause title. w 5 . 3 ‘ . w t HIGH COURT OF CHHATTBGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION gSz NO. 2285 OF 2011 {Writ Petition under Amok 226 of the Constitution of india) Singie Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihatri, J. Present :- Shri Rahui Birtharey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Dy. Advocate Genera) for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 02”“ day of May, 2G1 1 ) 1. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioners submits that the grievance of the petitioners with regard to fixation of the seniority was raised in the representation dated 25.05.2ODQ made to the Commissioner, P'uiatic tnstructtons, Raipurt The same has not yet been considered and, as‘suoh‘ a direction be issued to the Director, Puniic instructions to consider the above-stated representation and decide the same, in accordance with iaw, on its own merit 2i Shri Thakur, teamed Dyi AG. appearing forthe State/respondents submits that it the above~stated representation is stiii pending consideration the same shaii be coneidered and decided, as eariy as poseibie, in accordance with law. 3. in View of foregoing, teamed counsel appearing for the petitioner eubmits that nothing sun/ives for adjudication in thie matter. 4. Aocordingiy, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order asto costei Sdk S¢UUE“1]K.IUVG¢H}K3TRI Judge A aehok PETiTiONERS iPi Markam & Others Versus RESPONDENTS State ct Chhattisgarh &