1 GPN-J.332-ARCHB-8.94-1310500-ALA4 Spl-H.C.A.S.C.D.79e FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 4646 OF 1998 PETITION NO. 4646 OF 1998 PETITION NO. 4646 OF 1998 ------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office ) Memoranda of Coram, ) appearances, Court’s ) Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or directions ) and Registrar’s orders.) ------------------------------------------------------------ Mr.R.K. Mendadkar with Ms. Helen Koli Mandlik for Petitioner. Mr. R.M. Patne, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & S.P. KUKDAY,JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 18, 2005 P.C. . The counsel for the Petitioner states that the petition is not being pressed on merits. However, petitioner was admitted in Engineering College. The order of the Committee was stayed by this court and the Petitioner was allowed to prosecute the Engineering decree course. It is the contention of the petitioner that by now the petitioner must have completed his engineering course and he may be protected to that extent. 2 . The committee has rejected the case of the Petitioner as belonging to the Halba S.T. We have no reason to interfere with the findings recorded by the committee. However, considering the fact that petitioner was allowed to prosecute studies, more so by interim order of this court, we do not propose to interfere with the decree obtained by the petitioner, if any. With above observations, rule discharged. No order as to costs. . The Petitioner however, to file an undertaking within four weeks from today that the Petitioner and progeny will not take benefit as Halba S.T. (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (S.P.KUKDAY,J.)