uSi^M "•i^ Si?: H1GJ1COURTOF JUDICATURE CHHATT)SGARH:BILASPUR o. :a4!«HiS3® SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI S.R. NAYAK, CJ 1. Saligram s/o Vishes years s63 laniram s/o Visheshwar aged 50 Labhoram s/o Visheshwar aaed 4; Krishnanchand s/o Visheshwar as 45 years al! residents of Viliage Jarekela, P. No. 37, Tahsii Gharghoda, iaigarh. 3"2s!S'*^IE2'3<! 1. State of Madhya Pradesh through Secretary, Revsnue Depari:ment Vatlabh Bhawan, Bhopal. 2, The Collector, Raigarh, Dist. Raigarh, M.P. 3. The Sub Divisional Officer (Civil), Gharghoda, Dist. Raigarh, M.P. 4. Pardesi s/o Ghasilal aged about 30 years resident of Village Jarekeia, Tahsil Gharghoda, Dist. Raigarh. Shri P. Diwaker, leamed Sr. Advocate with Shri Adil Minhaj, learned counsel for the petitioners. Shri Sanjay S Agrawal, learned G.A. for the Stats/ respondent1 to 3. Shri V.R. Tiwari, learned counsel for respondent No.4. QRALQRDER on22"ajune, 2006) -^. 's-'S-'sS.-S-^-/^ The points that arise for decision are substantially similar to those that arose for decision in W.P. No.910 of 1998, disposed of by me, by a separate order today, except the detaite of the iand, notice, proceedings etc. In that view of the matter, i dismiss the writ petition with no order as to costs. The 3 respondent-Sub Divisionai Officer is directed to consider the repty atready filed by the petitioner^ if any, give the parties fair opportunity to submit their respective case and appreciate the evidence produced by them and pass appropriate order, in accordance wlth law, at an early date. it is, however, directed that the status-quo thaf obtains as on today with regard to possession of the subject property shall be maintained till the 3 respondent disposes of the proceedings. After receipt of a copy of this ordsr, before taking any further step and conducting any hearing, the 3 respondent shal! issue notice of hearing to the parties. Sd/- ChiefJustice ..•^"