IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M-1759 of 2009 Date of decision : 17.2.2009. ... Vinod Kumar and another ................ Petitioners vs. State of Haryana .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. Jainainder Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. Sh. Ashok Kumar Jindal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. ... K.C. Puri, J. (Oral) Vinod Kumar and Sonu – petitioners have applied for the grant of bail in FIR No. 383 dated 23.5.2008, under Sections 323/506/34 IPC, Section 307 IPC added later on, registered at Police Station City Hisar, District Hisar. As per allegation of the prosecution, Sonu gave a brick blow on the temporal area of Sushila, whereas Vinod gave injury on the temporal of Sushila. Opinion regarding the nature of injury was sought from Medical Officer, G.H., Hisar, who on 26.5.2008 opined that report regarding nature of injury be taken from private hospital. Thereafter, the opinion of private hospital i.e. Metro Hospital, Hisar was taken, who has given the opinion that there was depressed fracture on left temporal bone, underlying left temporal contusion, which is dangerous to life. Crl.M. No. M-1759 of 2009 -2- The State counsel has stated that in the FIR both Sonu and Vinod have given injury on the temporal area, but he cannot tell from the record who has given injury on the left side of the temporal. The petitioners are in custody since 26.5.2008. So, without commenting upon the merits of the case, bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court. ( K.C. Puri ) 17.2.2009. Judge chug