^^ SingteBench IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.fC) No. 3^T /2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^^t ^%v ..--y^.y" ^: 2] Munnalal Tandey, S/o. Late Shri Gangaram Tandey, aged about 40 years, R/o. Govt. Quarter H-3, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through: Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District Raipur 3"]" Collector (Tribal Welfare), ^" Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.) 4] Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Mahasamund, Collectorate Premises, District Mahasamund (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Y^ '^%^^ ^•J A^ HIGH CCyURT OF CHHiATNSGARH : BUASyUR SINGLBBBNCH : HON»BLBSHRI BIANINDRA MQHAM SHRIVA8TAVA,J, PBTITIONER RESPOND^TTS W.P. (Cl No.3887/2011 Munnalal Tandey Versiw State of Clihattisgarh 8s OTS. Petition under Articl®226 of the <3oastltutton ofIndta Appearance: Shri Manoj Paranjpe, counsel for the petitioner. Shii M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt Mvocatc for the State/respondents, on advance Gopy. ORAL-ORDBR (Passed on 20.7.2011) Heard on admission. 1. The grievance of the petitioner, as ventilated through fhis petition, is fhat even fhough son of the petitioner toas been selected for admission in Oyan Gan^ Public Boarding School, Raipur, under the scheme of Jawahar Adim Jati AnusucMt Jati Utkarsh Vidyarthi, fhrough tlie exammation and tiis admission recommended by tiie Commissioner, Tribal Welfare vide his letter dated 8.7.2011 addressed to fhe Asst. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, the concemed Asst Commissioner is not allowtag the son of the petitioner to take admission nor tesuing ^propriate orders for his admission to the concemed scliool on certato objections, which are baseless. '^ '% ^fc..-^.....l -2- ,/ 2. From fhe documents whicto have been placed on records and ftie averments which have been made by the petitibner m fhe petition, It is reveaMl/ fhat son of fhe petitioner was selected for admission to Gyan Gai^a PubMc Boarding School, Raipur under the welfare policy ofthe State Govt. to provide better education in public schools to scheduled caste and scheduled trttoes candidates known as Jawahar Adian Jati Anusuchit Jati Utkarsh ^dyarfhi Yojna. The son of fhe ^titioner belongs to schedule caste categoiy. It has been averred in fhe writ petittion ftiat son of the petitioner was sele^ted and was recommended for tfae admission. Leamed counsel for fhe petitioner submits fhat on 8.7.2011, the Commissioner, Tribal Welfeire, directed fhe Assistant Commissioner to provide adinission ^ter certata verification to ftie enlisted candidates, which tocluded fhe name of the son of petitioner for admission to Gyan Gteiga PiibUc Boarding School, Vidhan Sabha Road, Raipur. 3. Under fhese circumstances, it would be proper to direct respondent No-4/Assistant Commissioner, Tribial Welfere, Mahasamnd to look mto the claim of fhe petitioner aiid take appropriate steps to provlde admission to son ©fhe petitianer on the basis of fhe diTecticms/instructions issued by the Commissloner, Tribal Wetfare in his letter dated 8.7.2011 after necessary verification. The Asst. Commissioner shaU dcxdde fhe claim of the petitioner within a period of 10 days and if there is any objection, the same shall be conamunicated to Itie petitioner in writing. If after proper veriflcation, the case of son of fhe s ~\^.^~ 3- petitioner is cleared, immediate steps shaffl be taken for issuance of necessary ordere/letter to fhe concemed institution for his admission. 4. With the aforesaid observations, fhe ^tition is fiiially dispos^l of. 5. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge Praveea