l'o *l,n rHE HrcH couRT oF DELHr AT NEw DELHI Q + CRL.M.C. 1580/201 1 BRAHAM PARKASH & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Abhishek Kaushik, Advocate with Petitioners in person. VETSUS NCT OF DELHI & ORS Through: CORAM: IION'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER 16.05.2011 CRL. M.A. NO. 580L/20L1 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Crl. M.C. No. L580/20LL By this petition the Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 30912010 under Sections 3081452/34 IPC registered at PS Bawana, Delhi on the complaint of Jagdev Sharma/RespondentNo. 2 herein. As per the cornplaint, it is alleged that the Cornplainant and the Petitioner No. 1 Braham Prakash are having some dispute about the land and because of this his crops were destroyeci. On 5th December, 20J.0 at about ..... Respondents Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the State with SI Sumit Kumar, PS Bawana, Delhi. Mr. S.K. Malik, Advocate with Respondent Nos. 2,3 and 4 in Person. oh CRL.M.C. 1s80/2011 Page I cf 3 Signing Date:29.08.2024 17:09:50 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified 3.30 P.M. the Petitioner No.l along with Anil, Jai Prakash, Govind and Rambir entered their house with iron road, dandas and Gandasa in their hands and started beating thern resulting in injuries on Respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4. Respondent Nos. 2,3 and 4 arc present in Court and are identified by the learned counsel and the Investigating Officer. They state that tht: Petitioners are living in their neighbourhood and with the interuention of the neighbours and the relatives the matter has been settled between the parties' Since the parties are living in the neighborhood the pendency of the abovementioned FIR would create fuither acrimony and disharmony in their relations and the neighbourhood. They state that in view of the settlement between the parties, they do not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact.that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will and volition and without any coercion and no useful putpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be appropriate to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. CRL.M.C. 1s80/2011 Page 2 of 3 /.t ) ,n\/) ((/ Consequently, FIR No. 30912010 under Sections 3081452134\Pg- registered at PS Bawana, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed, subject to each of the Petitioners paying <5,000/- within two weeks to the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee' Parlies have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements before this Court. The petition stands disposed of' Order dasti' Wre- MUKTA GUPTA, J. MAY 16,20ll tvnt f--"4 .-<-*tQ-f a'WW ,,^htw G"r'd P,qrfrn J |ddt\ al|tr. 1drh"r"'oa "Aw; (u-,s;t3lY t ta.cl t{sorzott Page3of3, I tv Nlp,"tl"lfhlr+* rA^. I \X. &,"lc\r"^^ "6h D. \t r^; g;r,*!'ks