IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc No. M-2495 of 2009 Date of decision : 20.02.2009 Santokh Singh and othes ....Petitioners V/s State of Punjab and others ....Respondents. BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Ashit Malik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG Punjab. Mr. Parveen K Kataria, Advocate for the respondent No. 6. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) On the last date of hearing following order was passed:- “Counsel submits that the son of petitioners No. 1 & 2 married one Kanwaljit kaur on 16.07.2008 and since then their whereabouts are not known. However, the petitioners, who are all related to the boy namely Harkirpal Singh, are being threatened by the relations of the girls. Counsel further submits that though no FIR has been registered till date, yet the petitioners are being harassed by respondent No. 6 and his relations. Notice of motion for 20.02.2009”. Learned counsel for the State today has filed a reply on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and the same is taken on record. According to the said reply, petitioners are not required in any case and no complaint is pending against them. Counsel for the State has pointed out that ASI Baldev Singh, is present in Court on behalf of respondent No. 5 and has Crl. Misc No. M-2495 of 2009 -2- stated that there is no complaint pending against the petitioners at present at police station Mattewal. Learned counsel further submits that no harassment whatsoever is caused to the petitioners. In view of the statement made by counsel for the State, no cause of action survives in this petition and the same is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 20.02.2009 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE