HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 16th October, 2008 Bail Application No. 453 of 2008 Order on the bail application of the accused. Bhoop Singh S/o Ram Dayal …….. Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …….. Opposite Party __________________________________________________________ Case Crime No. 5026 of 2007 U/s 302/201 I.P.C. Police Station Pantnagar District Udham Singh Nagar Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Heard Mr. S.K. Mandal, Advocate for the applicant; Mr. Nandan Arya, A.G.A. for the State; and perused the record. It was contended on behalf of the accused/applicant that the co- accused Ramvir has already been enlarged on bail vide court’s order dated 15th October, 2008 in Bail Application No.469 of 2008, therefore, it is a case of parity. Learned A.G.A. did not dispute that it is not the case of parity. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case in totality; and contentions of the learned counsel for the parties; I find that it is a fit case for bail. Let the accused/applicant be released on bail on executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 16.10.2008 Shiv