IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.48134-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: OCTOBER 12, 2006 Smt.Divya Jyoti ...PETITIONER VERSUS Union Territory, Chandigarh ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. Manjeet Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.N.S.Shekhawat, Standing Counsel for U.T. Chandigarh. ... Petitioner Smt.Divya Jyoti apprehending her arrest in a non- bailable offence in case FIR No.239 dated 23.6.2006 registered under Section 304-B IPC at Police Station Sector 34, Chandigarh, has filed this petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail. I have heard the counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the FIR. This order be read in continuation of the earlier order dated August 18, 2006 passed by this Court. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner along with her husband and minor child is living separately from the house of the husband of the deceased and she has nothing to do with the allegations of demand of dowry as alleged in the FIR. Counsel for the petitioner further contends that in terms of the aforesaid interim order, the petitioner has joined the investigation. This fact has not been disputed by the State counsel and he further states that in this case challan has also been filed. In view of the above and for the reasons stated in the interim Crl.Misc.No.48134-M of 2006 -2- order dated August 18, 2006, the same is made absolute. Disposed of accordingly. October 12, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE