IN THE H1GH GOUKI' OF GHHATriSGARH : BILASPUK WritPetitipn (C) No. 1743 of2008 Petitioner Kailash Gabfael, aged about 30 vcars, S/o Shri GrEtiittt Kuraar CS^abhel, R/o Thakurdia, Kharsia, Dist. Raigarh (Chhatisgarh), Versus Respondents 1. 2. 3. 4. ! State of Chhattisgarh, fhrough tbe Secretaiy, Department of Urbaa AdministTation, Maatralaya, D.K.S.Bhawaii, Raipur (C.G.) Municipal Council Kharsai, ttuough Ctuef Mimicipal Officer, Kharsia, Dist. Raigarh (C.G.) Sub Divisfonal OfiScer (R), Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh. (C-G-) The Collector, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) (Writ Petition Uhder Artiele 226 of ftie Coastitution Of India) (SB; Honlle Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shla Vivek Raryaa Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shii A. S. Kachwaha, Depuly Advocate Geneial for the respondents No. 1,3 aml4. Shri B. D. Guru, Advocate forthe respondent No.2. ^w. ORDER (Passed onthis 21st Daybrjaauaiy, 2009) 1. With the consent of leafaed counsel appcaring tbr fhe parties the matter is heard fixially. 2. Leamed counsel appearmg for the petitioner subinits fhat at this stage fh.e petitioner restricts his prayer to the extent that he inay be permitted to make a representation to the conceined authonty/Respondent No.4 aiid. the coiicemed authority may be directed to consider and decide tbe representation, ia. accordaace with law, on its own m.erits, withln the prescribed time. 3. Sttri A. S, Kachwaha, leeiraed Deputy Advocate Gisneral appearmg for the respondents/State submits . that the representation, it' any, shall be considered and decided by the concerued authorily/Respondent No.4, ia accordaace wifh. law, on its own merits, withia a period of tliree weeks fl-om the date ofreceipt of the representation. 4. In view of the foregoiag, the petition staads disposed of. Sd/- ; Tb.Aui / SatishK.Agnihotri