IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.846 of 1985 Decided on : 06-09-2010 Karnail Singh ....Appellant VERSUS Harnam Singh ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- None for the parties MAHESH GROVER, J No one is present on behalf of the parties. I have perused the impugned judgment. The plaintiff-appellant prayed for possession of the suit property by pleading that he was owner of the same having purchased it on 24.3.1975. He conceded that the possession is with the respondent. The suit was filed in the year 1980 and was thus clearly hit by the provisions of Article 65 of the Limitation Act wherein a person who is basing his claim on the title was required to approach the Court within a period of 12 years. It is not the case of the appellant that he was ever in possession of the property. The Appellate Court was thus right in applying provisions of Article 65 of the Limitation Act to the facts of the case to decline the requisite relief to the appellant. No ground to interfere. Hence, dismissed. September 06, 2010 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge