IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1917 of 2008 AMRUL HASSAN & ORS Versus SK.FIROZ ALAM & ORS ----------- 2. 19.11.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. While this Court would not find any error in the impugned order allowing prayer of the defendant- opposite parties for calling certain documents for its being taken into evidence, the grievance of the petitioner that such relief will not be granted to him though he is a plaintiff is wholly misconceived. It goes without saying that if the plaintiff petitioner can satisfy the court below of requirement of any document to be led in evidence the court is under obligation to consider the same provided such prayer is made in terms of the settled procedure of the Code of Civil Procedure. With the aforementioned observation, this application is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/