IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31308 of 2010 PRABHU YADAV SON OF RAMDEO YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.9.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304B and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that even though there was an allegation in the first information report that the deceased was done to death by her in-laws for ends of dowry, but subsequently the informant filed a petition in the court below resiling from his earlier statement. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 7.6.2010, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in Laxmipur P.S.case No.35 of 2003, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iii) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two - 2 - consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The Magistrate concerned before releasing the petitioner on bail will notice the informant and confirm that indeed he had filed a petition resiling from his earlier statement and without coercion. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )