HIGH CGURT OF JUDECATURE CHHATTE$GARH: BELASPLifi $INGLE EEaKiCH : HGN’ELE $HRI SR. NAYIAK, GJ W P No 23 @F 26M F‘E’TiTiONERS i. Senior Manaqer in-charqe (Finance) Wages Bhiiai étee! Piant, Tspat Bhawan Bhiia§ ‘2. Steei Authoritv of india Ltd. Bhiiai Stee! Plant, Bhiiai represemed by Execut§ve Direcw (Fin) 3"? .t’ VER$U$ RESPQNE§ENT$ g.. 2. 3. Income Tax Officer (TBS) 32’32, Bungkaws Bhilai Depu‘iy Commissioner oi income Tax Bhiiai Circie, Bhiiai. Commissicner of income Tax Raipur ' Present: Shri Ashish Shrivastava, iearne‘d counsei far iiie petitioners. Shri Amit Choudhary. iearned counsel for the respondents. ORAL 6§DER gPessed en 16“ Nevember, 29%) $hri Amit Choudhary, learned counsel far the income Tax Depai‘iment would submit that the point tha’: arises f0? oiecieion in this Wm petition is squareiy covered by the judgment 9f this Court dated if5f2GOS I“ passed in WP. No.636 l3? 20m and 434 9f 20G’i. (2)3 in ihat view of the matier. ihis writ petition is dismissed for the very same reason set out by this Court in the above orders. No costs. Sdl— V Chief Justice l