1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.430/2009 IN CRIMINAL REVN.NO. 594/2008 Mithalal J.Jain & Anr. Applicants Vs. Chandan P.Mehta Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 431/2009 IN CRIMINAL REVN.NO. 595/2008 Mithalal J.Jain Applicants Vs. Abhay P.Mehta Respondent Mr.Omkar Khaiyam Shaikh i/b M/s Mishra & Co.for Applicants in both applications Mr.Sandip R.Karnik i/b Mr.A.H.H.Ponda for Res.no.1 in both applications Mr.H.J.Dedhia,APP for State in both applications CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J. DATE : 8th SEPTEMBER,2009 P.C. . In both these matters the applicants/accused were acquitted and the order of conviction was set aside by the order of this Court dated 24/4/2009 . As per the agreement of both the parties while compounding the offence the applicant/original accused has deposited an amount of Rs.35,000/- in Criminal Revision Application no.594 /2008 and Rs.2,10,000/- in Criminal Revision Application no. 595 /2008. 2 2] The learned counsel for the parties submit that the original accused has deposited the amount in the department in his name . The receipts are issued in the name of his advocate. The original complainant in Revision Application no.594/2008 Chandan Mehta and original complainant in Revision Application no. 595/2008 want to withdraw the said amount . However, as the receipts are issued in the name of advocate of original accused the department will not be in position to issue the cheques in the name of original complainants. 3] Considering this position the concerned department is directed to issue cheques in the name of original complainants as mentioned above and make specific note accordingly in the account book. Both the Applications stand disposed of. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.)