AB 659/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.K. MUSAHARY Heard Mr. B.K. Mahajan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B.S. Sinha, l earned Addl. Public Prosecutor. Also heard Mr. Mollah, learned counsel for the i nformant. The accused petitioner is a landlord and the victim woman is the tenant. Due to constant meeting, some relation has grown up between them. They also had physica l relation by mutual consent. This has been revealed in the case diary. Although the victim woman lodged the FIR, it has been submitted through her counsel that she consented to the physical relation with the accused petitioner and she woul d not oppose the granting of bail. Situated in such position, I direct that in the event of the arrest of the accus ed petitioner namely, Sri Pratap Singh, in connection with Basistha Police Stati on Case No.84/2011 under section 448/376 of the IPC, the accused petitioner sha ll be enlarged on bail of Rs.20,000/- with one local surety of the like amount s ubject to the satisfaction of the arresting authority, on the condition that he shall appear in person before the I.O concerned within 7 days from today and he shall co-operate with the investigation. Bail application stands disposed of.