1 caf9 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.14 OF 2011 K.Sivasankar & ors. ...Applicants vs. The Charity Commissioner & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.K.S.Dewal for the applicants Mr.Sandesh Deshpande for the respondent nos.2 and 3 CORAM : A.S.OKA,J. DATE : APRIL 11,2011 P.C.: 1 Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned counsel for respondent nos.2 and 3. The respondent nos.2 and 3 are revision applicants in the revision application. Hence, service of notice to other respondents is dispensed with. The learned counsel for the applicants has invited attention of the Court to order dated 18 th December 2008 passed by this Court in Writ Petition no.8295 of 2008, order dated 10th September 2009 in Writ Petition no.1943 and 1944 of 2009 as well as the order dated 15th December 2010 passed in Writ Petition no.9594 of 2010. His submission is that order of status quo passed by this Court was operating till the disposal of the application under section 72 (1) of the Bombay Public Trust Act,1950. The learned counsel for the respondent nos.2 and 3 submits that the order of the Joint Charity Commissioner was acted upon and therefore, there is no occasion to grant any interim relief. 2 One of the grounds on which the appeal is admitted is that all the trustees of the public trust whose 2 caf9 registration has been ordered to be cancelled by the Joint Charity Commissioner were admittedly not impleaded to the revision application on the day on which the order on revision application was passed. In fact, this Court had suggested that by setting aside the impugned orders the revision application can be heard afresh after granting permission to the respondent nos.2 and 3 to implead all the trustees of the trust as parties. However, the learned counsel for the respondent nos.2 and 3 has stated that the said respondents are not willing to go back before the learned Joint Charity Commissioner. 3 It must be noted here that all throughout during the pendency of the application under section 72 (1) of the said Act, order of status quo passed by this Court was in force which was continued from time to time till today. Now, the appeal has been admitted for final hearing and hence, the said order deserves to be continued till the disposal of the appeal. 4 Accordingly, application is disposed of by directing that order of status quo passed by this Court on 10 th September 2009 in Writ Petition nos.1943 and 1944 of 2009 will continue to operate. JUDGE