IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 22136 of 2007 Between: 1 K.V. Venkateswara Rao S/o. Venkateswara Rao M/s.Venkatramana Metal & Fire Works, Gandhi Chowk, Gannavaram, Krishna District. 2 G.V. Samba Siva Rao Fireworks Shop, Budhararam Road, Gannavaram, Krishna District. ... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Sub Inspector of Police, Gannavaram, Krishna District. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Gannavaram, Krishna District. 3 The Sub Collector, Gannavaram, Krishna District. 4 The Law and Order, Crimes and Traffic, Gannavaram, Krishna District. 5 The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Vijayawada, Krishna District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the respondents herein in trying to shift the petitioners fire works shops viz., Shri Venkateswara Rao M/s. Sri Venkatramana Metal & Fireworks at Gandhi Chowk, Gannavaram, Krishna District and G.V. Samba Siva Rao, Fire works shop, Buidhararam Road, Gannavaram Krishna District only on oral orders of the respondents as arbitrary, illegal, and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents as arbitrary, illegal and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents herein not to shift or interfere in possession and sale of fireworks from the petitioners existing shops and to pass such other order or orders as are deemed fit and proper. Counsel for Petitioners: MR.C.C.S.SASTRY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: Order: As there was no representation on behalf of petitioners on 18-01-2008, the writ petition was directed to be listed today, under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, when the matter is taken up, none appears for petitioners and there is no representation. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. __________________________ JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY. February 29, 2008 MRR ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VSMI}