IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 4929 of 2011 Date of Decision: August 10, 2011 Braham Parkash ...Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG, Haryana, for the State. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. Though respondent Nos.3 & 4 are not served, but Mr. Rathee has placed before me a copy of the reply stating that all the benefits due to the petitioner have been released. Copy of the reply handed over in Court, is taken on record. In para 7 of the reply, it is stated that respondent No.1 has issued revised retirement order on 4.5.2011. In view of this revised retirement order, the answering respondents have also released payment of leave encashment to the petitioner on 22.6.2011. In view of above, the present writ petition is rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. August 10, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE