IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32378 of 2008 BALRAM RAWAT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 19.09.08. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. . The informant Urmila Devi has alleged kidnapping of her daughter Choti Kumari by accused persons named in the F.IR.for which Barhat (Mallepur) P.S. Case No. 44/2006 has been instituted for offence under Section 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the victim girl in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has not disclosed petitioner’s involvement in the alleged occurrence rather she has stated that she went with Jahu Mian willingly. Now she is married with him and carrying pregnancy of seven months. Age of victim girl has been assessed in between 18 to 19 years by Medical Board. .Considering this fact, prayer on behalf of petitioner namely, Balram Rawat for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Barhat (Mallepur) P.S. Case No. 44/06 is allowed in case he surrenders before the court concerned within four weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Jamui, subject to the conditions, as laid down under Sub Section 2 of Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure. m.p. (Mridula Mishra, J.)