IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.O.C.P.No.441 of 2009 Date of Decision:-10.8.2009 Rajni Bahri ...Petitioner Versus Alok Bahri ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Mr.Anand Rohilla, Advocate for Ms.Jyoti Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.H.S.Saini, Advocate for the respondent. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): In response to the show cause notice issued by this Court, reply by way of affidavit of the respondent has been filed in Court and the same is taken on record. In the reply submitted by the respondent, it has been specifically stated that the petitioner has already filed a fresh petition under Section 125 Cr.PC for grant of maintenance before filing of the present contempt petition and the aforesaid fact has not been mentioned by the petitioner in the present contempt petition. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner does not dispute this fact. In view of the aforesaid fact, I am not inclined to proceed further with this petition. Rule discharged. (Rakesh Kumar Garg) 10.8.2009 Judge AS