IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36297 of 2008 VINAY KUMAR, Son of Ram Brich Singh, Advocate, Resident of Mohalla- Shekhpura Sherghatty, P.S.- Sherghatty, District- Gaya :------ Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR:-------Opposite Party ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Shivendra Prasad, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwari, A.P.P. ====== 6. 22.12.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 395 and 397 of the Penal Code registered in connection with bank dacoity. He has been implicated in this case at the instance of Ramesh Kumar who stated in his extra judicial confession that he had called the petitioner who is an Advocate’s clerk to make payment for the services rendered by him in connection with the litigation pending against said Ramesh Kumar in different courts. Let the court below verify whether petitioner is a registered Advocate’s clerk and if that be so then release him, namely, Vinay Kumar on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Sherghati (Gaya) in connection with Gurua P.S.Case No. 30 of 2008. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)