IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 17049 of 2006 DATED: 21.8.2006 Between: D.Narasimha Reddy petitioner And The Regional Manager, APSRTC, Hyderabad City Region, JBS, Picket, Secunderabad and 2 others Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO. 17049 of 2006 ORAL ORDER: Assailing the action of the respondents in recovering an amount of Rs.1,14,792.80 Ps towards the loan amount and penal interest instead of Rs.30,000/- as illegal and arbitrary the present writ petition is filed. The petitioner herein while working as Conductor in the respondent corporation obtained a loan of Rs.32,700/- and Rs.20,000/- in the year 1982 and 1989 respectively repayable in monthly instalments. He was promoted in the year 1994 as Assistant Depot Clerk was transferred to Cantonment Bus Depot. The petitioner claims that from the date of issuance of the loan amount, the instalments were being recovered from his salary and due to non availability of loan details mentioned in the last pay certificate, deductions were not made in the Cantonment depot where he is presently working. The petitioner claims that he is liable to pay only an amount of Rs.30,000/- and alleges that the respondents delayed the recoveries and by making wrong calculations has insisted to pay an amount of Rs.91,819/- and Rs.22,973.80 for the loans obtained by him and illegally recovered the same by making wrong calculations. Hence, the present writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for respondent corporation. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is that he is liable to pay only an amount of Rs.30,000/- and the respondents by making wrong calculations and imposing penal interest has illegally recovered an amount of Rs.1,14,792.90. The record does not disclose that the petitioner has raised any objection for such recoveries made nor submitted any representation to the concerned authorities furnishing the details and requesting the authorities to correct the mistakes, if any committed in calculating the due amount. The calculation of the loan amount is purely a factual aspect governed by an agreement entered into between the parties and omissions or commissions, if any, committed can only be looked into by the authorities concerned and this Court cannot go into the same. Hence, this Court do not see any reason to interfere into the matter. There are no merits in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. However, this order does not preclude the petitioner from making a detailed representation to the respondent authorities. On making any such representation, the respondents are at liberty to consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law. ____________ N.V.RAMANA,J DATE: 21.8.2006 TVK THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 17049 of 2006 DATED: 21.8.2006