IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1635 OF 2000 Shri Dattatraya Vinayak Hasabnis ...Petitioner Versus Sou.Sudha Dattatraya Hasabnis & Anr....Respondents ...... Mr.D.K.Ghaisas for Petitioner. Mr.K.V.Saste, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. JANUARY 13, 2005. JANUARY 13, 2005. JANUARY 13, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The finding recorded by the Court below in Para 8 of the impugned order that the issue as to whether the Respondent No.1 was legally wedded wife is no more open for debate in view of the decision of the Civil Court in matrimonial proceedings, will have to be upheld, therefore, the argument canvassed before this Court that the Respondent No.1 was not entitled for maintenance, as she was : 2 : not legally wedded wife, cannot be accepted. Since that is the only objection taken, no case for interference. Hence, dismissed. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.