Crl.M.No.M-27229 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-27229 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:September 16, 2010 Jaspal Singh .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.K.S.Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. .... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.No.48606 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-27229 of 2010 The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.101, dated 21.7.2010, under Sections 307/34 IPC, and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Sadar Sunam. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully, including the order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sangrur, vide which application filed on behalf of the present petitioner for anticipatory bail was dismissed. Brief allegations against the petitioner-accused are that he alongwith co-accused, i.e., brother of petitioner attacked the complainant party. Co-accused fired from double barrel gun belonging to the petitioner on lalkara being raised by him. Co-accused fired shot on the complainant twice with 12 bore gun belonging to the petitioner causing injuries to complainant including injuries in his chest and stomach. Co-accused also reloaded the gun and fired again twice. Hence, it is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner-accused. Rather, his Crl.M.No.M-27229 of 2010 (O&M) -2- custodial interrogation is necessary. Hence, in view of these facts, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner- Jaspal Singh for grant of anticipatory bail is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit. 16.9.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge