IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 12TH APRIL 2007 / 22ND CHAITHRA 1929 WP(C).No. 29804 of 2005(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ MADHURAKKAT VALIYA MADATHIL SREEDHARAN KANAKKAPILLAI, S/O.T.M.VISHNU NAMBISAN, P.O.HARIPURAM (VIA) ANANDASHRAM, HOSDURG TALUK AND KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.SHRIHARI RAO RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE TALUK LAND BOARD, TALIPARAMBA. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, TALIPARAMBA TALUK, TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT. 3. AUTHORISED OFFICER AND SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.R.), TALUK LAND BOARD, TALIPARAMBA. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PERINGOME VILLAGE, TALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/04/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J ----------------------------------------- W.P.(C)NO.29804 of 2005 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of April, 2007 JUDGMENT The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondents in holding that excess land to be surrendered by the petitioner should be taken from land in resy.No.8/1 of Peringome village instead of the survey number mentioned in the order of the Taluk Land Board. Now the petitioner submits that going by the statement filed by the Government Pleader on behalf of the second respondent, the matter has been referred back to the first respondent Taluk Land Board for clarification, and therefore, he would be satisfied with a direction to the first respondent to pass appropriate final orders in the matter expeditiously. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader. I have also perused the statement filed by the Government Pleader on behalf of the second respondent. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the Taluk Land Board (first respondent herein) to take a W.P.(C)No.29804/2005 :2: final decision in the matter, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE css / W.P.(C)No.29804/2005 :3: W.P.(C)No.29804/2005 :4: