‘HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR O Writ Petition 1s) No. 3572 of 2005 Applicant Sone Sai Sahu S/o Late Shri Jait Ram Sahu, Aged about 62 years, Retired Plamberl P.W.D. Division, Raipur Rio Gram Mova, Govt. Higher Secondary Schooi, Near Sundripara Mova. Raipur. Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary, P.W.D. Department, Mantralaya, D.K. Hospitai Bhavan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. Executive Engineer, P.W.D. Division, Raipur II, Distt. Raipur. 3. Sub-Divisional Officer. P.W.D. Sub-Division No. 1, Raipur 7“ SB : Hon’ble Justice Shri Satish K. Aqnihotri Present: Mr. Sanjay Patel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. V.V.S. Murthy, Deputy Advocate General with Ms. Deepali Pandey, Panel lawyer for the respondents/State. ORDER (Passed on this 2““ day of May, 2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the facts End question of law involved in the present writ petition are similar to that of in Writ Petition No. 4135 of 2004 (MA. Hakim vs. State of ’ Madhya Pradesh (Now C'3G.) and others), which has already been disposed of vide orde} dated 28.8.2006. . Mr. V.V.S. Murthy, learned Deputy Advocate General with Ms. Deepali Pandey. learned Panel lawyer for the respondents/State fairly submits that against the order dated 28.8.2606, passed in WP. No. 4235 of 2004, the State Government has filed the Special Leave Petition before Hon'ble the Supreme Court, which has been dismissed. / to Thereafter a rewew petition med therein was also dismissed Thus this case is squarely covered by the said declswn 3. in View of the above submission made by iearned counsel appearing for the parties, the writ petition is ailowed in the same terms, as passed in the matter of MA. Hakim vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (Now C.G.) and others. No order as to costs. I It ; Sdl- \ Saush K Agmhotn 1 i ‘ udge f’lr