IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fCHHATTISGARH) W.P.NO. ±€>3^ . /20.02 PETITIONER S1 A JAWTmiR RAM S/0. ADAL RAM CASTE- GOND, R/0. RAMPUR KALA, P.S. AND TAH. AMBIKAPUR DISTT. SURGUJA (CHHATTISGARH) RESPONDENTS .'M ^y 't^.,^ ^ Y,^ '^'y ^ ^^ 7). 8) 9); 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) 15) VERSUS • ^^^^, ^^^ 1) STATE OF CHHATTISGARH.-^TD^ & S^SC^^<, ^^^VA^ , r>^^. S^^o^. ^^^f^^ 2) THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, FIS'HT^Y INDUSTRY, AMBIKAPUR, DISTT. SURGUJA (CHHATTISGARH) 3) GRAM PANCHAYAT S7\KHAULI, BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, AMBIKAPUR, DISTT. SURGUJA (CHHATTISGARH) BODHAN, S/0. BISHUN AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS .BALDEV, S/0. BISHNA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, SUKHDEV S/0. LATE SONU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, DOMNA, 3/0.. DASHAYEE, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, KENDU, S/0. KHIRMOT AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS BHAGLU S/0. RAMBHALAI AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS. RAMNATH, S/0. BUDHU, AGED ABOUT 22YEARS, P7UIRU, S/0. BUDHU AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS. 7\ANA, S/0. KUNDARU, AGED ABOUT 45 YE7VRS, SOMARU, S/0. ANSO, AGED 7VBOUT.45 YET^S, GOD7VRI, S/O.JHANJHARI, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, SAKHDEV, S/0. NANKA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 16) GOHDUL S/0. SUKHJW AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, SN.4 TO 16 ARE R/0. VILLAGE AAMADARSJIA, CASTE-PAHARI KORWA, OCCUPATION-LABOURER, P.S. DARIMA, AMBIKAPUR DISTT. SURGUJA (CHHATTISGARH) 17) GIRISH CHANDRA PRATAP SINGH, SURPANCH GRAM PANCHAYAT SOKHAULI, AMBIKAPUR, DISTT. SURGUJA (CHHATTISGARH) ^ WRIT PETITION TTNDER ARTTFT.ES 226/228 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF TNDIA. .1:.^^..^^^..-._.-__ XI-HC-22 3:IT^T^T -^Ti^ent^T W^ ~^ft<T ^sr ^pn^z?,-g^Fi^, /^ ^J:,...';' V),"(>. (03^-)^^^- 11T^^TWffT^"""'^'<""^""*"^^>"""T<<^ 2(N) "fa^&I""""""""""""""".' 3TT^[ ^I^TT^R Trf^T extended period (Annexure PJ ^rqf^^ TrTT^f -q feT^ • •^T S^PT .STT^T 07.08.2003 Shri Sushil Dubey, Advo^ate for the Petitioner. Shri Rajesh Pandey, Gov^. Advocate for the State. Heard. It i8 stated that initial^y the petitioner was ollotted certain ponds on lease for fisl|iing for a period of five years, later on the said period ofleas^ was extended for seven years< Accordingly, the petitioner h^s executed lease-deed for the f4). Thereafter, the petitioner was informed that the exten|ied lease was terminated by passuig a resolulioii by Uie Gij'aiu-Paiicliayal. TIie pelitioiicr preferred appeal before the Ad4itional CoUector, Surguja who aftcr considcring thc facts and ^ircumstariccs and matcrial on record stayed the execution c|f the order of termination of lease-deed (Annexure P/5). Tt^e respondents 4 to 16 being aggrieved by the order passed t|y the Additional Collector filed Misc. case before the Collectot-. Petitioner submits tliat the Collector has passed the exporte order dated 1-1,8.2001 without giving opportunity of h|earing. Having considered the fajcts and circumstances of the case and without expressing ai}iy opii-don in the merits of the .case, in the opinion of tfais Court ends ofjustice will be served \ -^HT^ '^[7^^ ^- XI-HC-22 •^"^ ^l^ld^ '^ftTFT^^. t^^l^ ./c.,, / t)b,P. ?o9^-^^0- irrq^r^^ra?' 2(M) •^?<y STS^T^? t^Tr^3?1^T •^tt^^ifi^ v^. STS^i-^HW ^ilt^ ff if the petitioner mskes a de|:ailed representetion afresh alongwith a copy of this petitic^n within 15 days from today before the CoUector and on su^h representation being flled, the Collector shall after giving petitioner and tlie other side, coiJisider and decide the saiiie as early as possible preterably witt^in two months from the date of receipt of the representation i^i accordaace with law. Ifany 1 grievance subsists, the ag^rie\ W^wfP. ^TTrFff ^ fe^ '<1^^' ^- sri^R ^Tf^r pportunity of hearing to the ed party may avail remedy under the law. With the du'ection aforesaid, this petition is disposed of, ) Accordingly, M.W.P. No. 401/02 and I.A. No. 3483/02 i also stand disposed of. C.C» as per rules. .Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ^ ^r^ -.^"