IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 13TH OCTOBER 2011 / 21ST ASWINA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 910 of 2011() ------------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.29002/2010 Dated 30/09/2010 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER ---------------------------------- K.P.VIJAYAN, KARUMAN PARAMBIL HOUSE, P.O.PUZHAKKAL, THRISSUR. BY ADVS. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR SMT.G.CHITRA RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------------------- P.C.THOMAS, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR. PIN 680 001. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. MANOJ P. KUNJACHAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs COC. NO. 910/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A1: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN WPC. NO.29002/2010 DATED 30/09/2010. ANNEXURE A2: COPY OF THE LETTER SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT ALONG WITH THE JUDGMENT FOR COMPLIANCE DATED 19/10/2010. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. ---------------------------------- Cont. Case (C)No.910 of 2011 ----------------------------------- Dated 13th October, 2011 JUDGMENT This contempt petition has been filed alleging willful disobedience with the directions in the judgment dated 30.9.2010 in W.P.(C)No.29002 of 2010. As per the said judgment, this Court directed the respondent to consider Ext.P6 application, referred as such therein, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. When this matter came up for admission on 25.8.2011 this Court directed the respondent to file an affidavit and the personal appearance was dispensed with. However, when this matter was taken up for consideration on 27.9.2011, no affidavit was placed on record. It is in the said circumstances that personal appearance of the respondent was ordered. Subsequently, an affidavit was placed on record in terms of the order dated 25.8.2011. It is specifically stated therein that in terms of the directions in the judgment dated 30.9.2010 a timing conference was convened and ultimately order No.C2/29002/2011 dated 13.9.2011 was passed. In the said circumstances, recording the said fact, this contempt petition is closed. In case the petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 13.9.2011 it will be open to him to challenge it in appropriate proceedings, in accordance with law. Sd/- C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge TKS