CRM-M No. 31061 of 2011 **** Vinod Kumar v. State of Haryana Present: Mr. J.S.Bedi, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Choudhary, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for the complainant. **** This is a petition for regular bail filed in case bearing FIR No. 216 dated 31.07.2011, under Sections 147, 148, 323, 325, 307, 308, 201 IPC registered at Police Station DLF, Qutab Enclave, Gurgaon, District Gurgaon. On 17.10.2011 the following contention was noticed:- “ Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that by order dated 26.09.2011 passed in CRM-M No. 27755 of 2011 the co- accused was granted the concession of anticipatory bail and that the petitioner has now been in custody since 31.07.2011.” Apart from that learned counsel has argued that the alleged victims have now been discharged from the hospital. Learned AAG, on instructions from SI Jagdish as well as learned counsel for the complainant have accepted this factual assertion. Learned counsel for the complainant, however, states that some persons have still not been arrested by the police. Be that as it may, without going into the merits of the case, this petition is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Gurgaon. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE December 13, 2011 sunita