IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 17341 of 2011. [O&M] Date of Decision: 15th September, 2011. Rakesh Kumar Aggarwal Petitioner through Mr. R.K.Arora, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner seeks a direction for the release of Annual Increments for the years 1992 and 1993 claiming that the same were not released arbitrarily, even though he had successfully completed the probation period. Though, there is no explanation for the inordinate delay, however, having regard to the fact that the petitioner is said to have represented the authorities for the desired relief on 07.07.2011, the writ petition is disposed of, without expressing any views on the petitioner's entitlement, with a direction to respondent No. 2 to take a decision on the petitioner's representation in accordance with law within a period of six months from the date a certified copy of this order is received. Disposed of. Dasti. September 15, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE