1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1651 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.269 OF 2009 Vasant s/o Jagannath Chavan Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.Swapnil S.Rathi, advocate for the applicant. Mr. Dilip Bankar Patil, A.P.P. For Respondent-State. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 11th June, 2009. P.C.: Heard Shri S.S.Rathi, learned Counsel for the applicant and Shri Dilip Bankar Patil, learned A.P.P. For Respondent-State. Accused-applicant is convicted for the offence punishable under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code and is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months. Accused-applicant is also convicted for offence punishable under Section 498-A of I.P.C. and is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay fine of Rs.2000/-, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two months. The substantive sentences are directed to run concurrently. 2 It is stated by learned Counsel for the applicant that accused-applicant was enlarged on bail during the course of trial. In this view of the matter, the substantive sentence imposed against the accused-applicant needs to be suspended during the pendency of appeal. Criminal Application is thus allowed. The substantive sentence of imprisonment imposed against accused-applicant by Sessions Judge, Parbhani, in Sessions Trial No.34/2009, by judgment and order dated 30.04.2009, is suspended during the pendency of appeal. Accused-applicant Vasant s/o Jagannath Chavan is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rs.Ten thousand) with one surety in the like amount. Bail before the trial Court. (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE ******* adb/criappln165109