IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 30TH MARCH 2010 / 9TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 10901 of 2010(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ANAND MAHADEVAN, S/O.K.MAHADEVAN, 37/2511, T.D.ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 035. BY ADV. SRI.K.JAJU BABU SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI SRI.BRIJESH MOHAN SRI.T.R.SADEESAN SRI.T.S.SHYAM PRASANTH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REGISTRAR OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS, PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY, PALAKKAD. 2. THE PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY, PALAKKAD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY SC SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ------------------- W.P.(C).10901/2010 -------------------- Dated this the 30th day of March, 2010 JUDGMENT According to the petitioner, his name has been wrongly entered in the records of the 1st respondent. Therefore, he submitted Ext.P4 representation requesting for correction of his name as 'Anand Mahadevan' instead of 'Hariharan'. Orders have not been passed on Ext.P4 and therefore the writ petition is filed. 2. Heard both sides. 3. In cases of this nature, this Court has repeatedly held that if there is a mistake in the particulars entered by the 1st respondent, it is for the 1st respondent to pass orders correcting such mistakes. Having regard to the pendency of Ext.P4 representation made by the petitioner in this behalf, I dispose of this writ W.P.(C).10901/10 2 petition directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with the copy of the writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs