IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND JUNE 2010 / 12TH JYAISTHA 1932 Crl.MC.No. 1910 of 2010() ------------------------- CRRP.5/2008 of SESSIONS COURT, KASARAGOD CMP.5140/2007 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I, HOSDRUG .................... PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ 1. RAJAN, 40 YEARS, S/O.APPUCHETTY, R/AT KAVVAI. 2. C.MADHAVAN, 49 YEARS, S/O.ALAMI, SECRETARY, SREEKRISHNAPURAM TEMPLE, KAVVAI. 3. M.KUNHIKRISHNAN, 48 YEARS, S/O.KOMA, PODUVEL, PRESIDENT, SREEKRISHNAPURAM TEMPLE, KAVVAI. 4. KUNHIRAMAN @ KUNHAMAN, 68 TEARS S/O.NOT KNOWN, TREASURER, SREEKRISHNAPURAM TEMPLE, KAVVAI. 5. K.V.KUNHIRAMAN, 77 YEARS, S/O.KANNAN, R/AT.KAVVAI. 6. APPUTTY HEGDA. 52 YEARS, S/O.NOT KNOWN, R/AT.KAVVAI. 7. NALINI TEACHER, 69 YEARS, W/O.NOT KNOWN, KAVVAI. 8. DAMODERAN, 58 YEARS, S/O.CHOMMU, R/AT.KAVVAI. CR.M.C.NO.1910/2010 2 9. BALAKRISHNAN, 96 YEARS, S/O.CHOMMU, R/AT.KAVVAI. 10. KUMAR, S/O.PADMANABHA HEGDA, R/AT KAVAVI. 11. CHOMMU, 79 YEARS, W/O.KUNHIKANNAN, R/AT KAVVAI. 12. LALAITHA, 48 YEARS, D/O.CHOMMU, R/AT KAVVAI. 13. KAMALABHAI, 73 YEARS, W/O.MANJAPPA HEGDE, R/AT KAVVAI. 14. VENUGOPALAN NAIR, 47 YEARS, S/O.KOMAN NAIR, R/AT THEYAMMAL. BY ADV. SRI.T.B.SHAJIMON SMT.GOVINDU P.RENUKADEVI RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: ------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REP.BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HOSDURG POLICE STATION, REP.BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. K.KRISHNAN, S/O.KUNHIRAMAN, R/AT KALLURAVI, KANHANGAD SOUTH. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.S.U.NAZAR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Crl.M.C..No.1910 of 2010 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 2 nd day of June, 2010 ORDER The order impugned in this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C is Annexure A3 final order passed by the Sessions Court, Kasaragod allowing the revision filed by the 2nd respondent herein. If so, it is a final order which is revisable at the instance of the petitioner. 2. Realising the above hurdle, the learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission to convert the Crl.M.C into a Revision. The permission is granted. This Crl.M.C. is disposed of accordingly. It will be re-registered as a revision by the Registry and shall be sent to the appropriate Court as per the roster. Dated this the 2 nd day of June, 2010. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE sj