CR No.1971 of 2009 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No.1971 of 2009 Date of Decision: 29 - 7 - 2010 Munshi Ram ....Petitioner v. Shri Kishan and others ....Respondens CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA *** Present: Mr.J.P.Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Akshay Kumar Goel, Advocate for respondent Nos.1,2,4 to 9. *** KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the petitioner states that he has sought instructions from the petitioner not to press the present petition in case some reasonable time is granted to vacate the demised premises. Mr.Akshay Kumar Goel, counsel appearing for respondents No.1,2 and 4 to 9 has stated that in case the parties can settle the dispute, he is always ready to extend an olive branch. During the course of arguments, a broad consensus has been arrived at between the parties. It is stated that in case the tenant-petitioner is granted two years and six months time to vacate and hand over vacant possession of the demised premises, it will be in the interest of all. CR No.1971 of 2009 [2] In view of the consensus formulated between the parties, tenant-petitioner is granted two years and six months time to vacate and hand over vacant possession of the demised premises. He shall file an undertaking by 1.9.2010 before the Rent Controller that he shall hand over actual physical vacant possession of the demised premises on or before 31.1.2013. He shall also undertake that the entire arrears of rent shall be paid immediately and the future rent by 7th of each following months. As prayed by Mr.J.P.Sharma, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Needless to say that in case the consensus formulated in this order is not adhered to by the parties, then the law will take its own course. ( KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA ) July 29, 2010. JUDGE RC