- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO.182 OF 2007 ----------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s appearances, Court’s orders order or directions ----------------------------------------------------- ¦ Mr.R.V.Desai with Ms.Lata Patne ¦ for the Appellant. ¦ Mr.P.V.Patankar with ¦ Mr.P.P.Patankar for the Respondent. ¦ ¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & ¦ J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. ¦ DATED: 17TH JULY, 2008 P.C.: Heard the learned Counsel for both sides. The order of the tribunal shows that the tribunal has relied on the judgments of the tribunal mentioned in paragraph 3 of the order. The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant urged before us that the matter was not covered by the judgments referred to by the tribunal in paragraph 3 of its order. - 2 - 2. Perusal of the order shows that this was not the submission made before the tribunal. It appears from the order that before the tribunal the Appellant has not raised an issue that the matter is not covered by the judgments which were referred before the tribunal. 3. In our opinion, therefore, no fault can be found with the order of the tribunal in disposing of the appeal. Petition is, therefore, rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)