: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.873 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.873 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.873 OF 2006 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3959 OF 2003 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3959 OF 2003 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3959 OF 2003 Sunanda Madhukar Salvi ...Applicant. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents. Shri A.V.Pawaskar h/for Khandeparkar & Associates for the Applicant. Shri N.N.Gavankar with Arfan Sait, advs. for the Respondent No.2. Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, APP for the State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 4th May, 2007. DATE : 4th May, 2007. DATE : 4th May, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Mr.A.V.Pawaskar the learned counsel for the applicant and Mr.N.N.Gavankar the learned counsel for the respondent no.2. The applicant is present in person. 2. The parties have filed ’Consent Terms’ marked ’X’ and the applicant has also filed ’Undertaking’ marked ’Y’. Undertaking accepted. In view of the amicable settlement between the parties in terms of the ’Consent Terms" and the Undertaking, this application stands disposed off. : 2 : (J.H.Bhatia,J.) (J.H.Bhatia,J.) (J.H.Bhatia,J.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.40 OF 2007 CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.40 OF 2007 CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.40 OF 2007 Mrs.Madhavi Neelkanth Gawankar ...Petitioner. V/s. Smt.Sunanda Madhukar Salvi & Anr. ...Respondents. Shri N.N.Gavankar with Arfan Sait, advs. for the Petitioner. Shri A.V.Pawaskar h/for Khandeparkar & Associates for the Respondent No.1. Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, APP for the State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 4th May, 2007. DATE : 4th May, 2007. DATE : 4th May, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Mr.N.N.Gavankar the learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr.Pawaskar the learned counsel for : 3 : the Respondent No.1. 2. This contempt petition was filed on the ground that the respondent no.1 had not complied with the ’Consent Terms" filed in the Criminal Application No.3959 of 2003. The learned counsel for the Petitioner informs that now the matter has been settled amicably again for which the ’Consent Terms" are filed in Criminal Application No.873 of 2006 filed by the respondent. In view of this settlement, the petitioner seeks to withdraw this contempt petition. 3. In view of the amicable settlement between the parties, Contempt Petition stands disposed off as withdrawn. (J.H.Bhatia,J.) (J.H.Bhatia,J.) (J.H.Bhatia,J.)