c^ •-< 5 SingteBdiich IN THE HON'BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) WRIT PETITION fS.) N0:^/? ? f^/2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ..^* ^ ....<^^ ^".••^<re> ^^7 ^y^ .^ .^v ^ ^y,- ^y ^"' 1. 2. 3. 5. Shrimati Nirmala Rai, aged about 34 years, wife of Rajesh Rai, at present working as a Class III Shiksha karmi, R/o Village Post Cherapalti Tehsil Bhopalpatnam District Bijapur (C.G.) VERSUS Director Mission Leader, Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Raipur (C.G.) Collector and Mission Leader Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Misson Dantewada, District South Baster, Dantewada (C.G.) Collector and Mission Leader Rajjev Gandhi Shiksha Misson, District Bijapur (C.G.) 4. The Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Bhopalpatnam, Distt Bijapur (C.G.). The Block Education Officer, Bhopalpatnam, Distt Bijapur (C.G.). fRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTI- TUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT OR MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI.ORDER/ORDERS. MRECTION/ DIRECTIONS ETC. /y^ ^\ ff / '..^ 1 -^y- j ^ -g-^r ^j^iKn^. ^TiT^^i^ f^iray ^ffHyff ^*i8<s<» ..y..e..fe2..-?...-..SA^2oo ^^^^! ( ^(^^f) 3?T^I ^T Iqii<^' 1OTT 3?T^T ^"RN? Deepti '^RHW^f?^ ^n^T SB: Hon'bie Shri Manindra Mohan Shdi 04-07-2011 Shri Vishnu Koshta, counsei for tht Ms. Sunita Jain, Panei Lawyerfor| Heard. Limjted grievance as raised by tj though, the petitioner was worked as 'G^ honoranum from the month of Juiy, 20011 Learned counsei for the petitjo) representation have been made to the C^ Bhopalpatnam with a copy to the Missioj her grievance has not been redressed till In view ofthe above, it is directec t'ne case of the petitioner and in case, if Ipayment of honorarium, the same shouid Wjth the aforesaid djrection, the pe "^Rf^N'RTH^f ^ 1^^ ^N^H •^3?i^R3iT^T vastava, J. petitioner. ihe State/respondents 1 to 3 and 5. ie petitioner through thls petition Is that ruji" under Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission, to June, 2005 has not been paid to her. ier submitted that in spite of several 'ief Executive Offlcer, Janpad Panchayat, Leader, Rajiv Gandhi Shsksha Mission, Idate. |that the respondent No.3 shaii examine Is found that the petitioner is entftled for |be released without further deiay. tition is finaliy disposed off. Sd/- ManindraMohan Shrivastava Judge ^W^ft^gs<m^r,Ti^kITN—FS/i40—2/2011—1,50,000.