1 Cri.Appln. No. 723 of 2011 hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 723 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 455 OF 2010 Dilip Babruvahan Giri ... Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr. Amol Joshi for the applicant. Mr. J.P. Yagnik, A.P.P. for State. Mr. Sachin V. Dhakephalkar for respondent no. 6. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & K.U. CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 09, 2011 P.C. Heard. 2. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that respondent no. 6 has not complied with direction no. 2 of the judgment and order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan in Sessions Case No. 75 of 2007 dated 18th May, 2010. 2 Cri.Appln. No. 723 of 2011 3. The learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 6 states that respondent is not in a position and willing to execute the bond of Rs2,50,000/- for getting the articles attached under panchanama Exh. 216. 4. Considering the scope of this application, we are not inclined to allow the request of the applicant in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) of the application. Hence, application is rejected. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.) (NARESH H. PATIL,J.)