IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 2404 of 2009 Between: Dasari Surayya S/o. Late Veerayya Tantikonda Village, Gokavaram Mandal, East Godavari Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Additional Agent to Government East Godavari Dist. Rampachodavaram. 2 The Special Deputy Tahsildar (TW) Devipatnam Mandal, Devipatnam, East Godavari Dist. 3 The Tahsildar Devipatnam Mandal Devipatnam, East Godavari Dist. 4 The Government of A.P. Rep. by its Secretary Social Welfare (LTR-2) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, declaring as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the action of the 4th respondent in not granting stay / suspension of the orders of the 1st respondent in CMA No. 144 of 2005 dated 15-01-2009, in the statutory revision before it and it is further consequentially prayed that this Honourable Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order in CMA No. 144 of 2005 dated 15-01- 2009 on the file of the 1st respondent, pending disposal of the statutory revision dated 28-01-2009 on the file of the 4th respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI S.R.SANKU & KAVITI MURLI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.2404 OF 2009 ORDER: The only grievance of the petitioner is that aggrieved by the order made in L.T.R.P.No.320 of 2004 dated 02.08.2005 on the file of the Special Deputy Collector, Tribal Welfare, Rampachodavaram, East Godavari District, he filed C.M.A.No.144 of 2005 and the same was also dismissed on 15.01.2009 by the 1st respondent-Additional Agent to Government, East Godavari District at Rampachodavaram. Aggrieved by the same, he preferred a statutory revision before the 4th respondent- Government and during pendency of the revision, he also filed a stay petition seeking suspension of the orders of the 1st respondent. However, the stay petition is not yet disposed of. Therefore, the present writ petition has been filed. 2. According to the petitioner, the transactions in dispute have taken place much prior to the Act 1 of 1970 came into force and throughout the proceedings and even as of now he is in possession of the property. 3. In view of the pendency of the revision petition before the 4th respondent, it would be appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the 4th respondent to dispose of the revision petition filed by the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, pending disposal of the revision petition, the respondents are directed not to dispossess the petitioner from the schedule land. 4. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. No costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU,J 16.02.2009 v v