46 cp 314.09.doc 1 srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 314 OF 2009 Mrs. Neeta Rakesh Jain ... Petitioner Vs. Mr. Rakesh Jeetmal Jain ... Respondent None for Petitioner. Mr. Manish Rai i/b Smt. Manjula Rao for Respondent. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 9th September, 2010. P. C. 1 None for the Petitioner. 2 The learned counsel for the Respondent points out that this Contempt Petition was filed for noncompliance of order dated 21st September, 2006 passed by this court in Civil Application No.107 of 2006 in Family Court Appeal No. 10 of 2006 granting maintenance at the rate of Rs.12,000/- per month to the Petitioner. The Petitioner had herself 46 cp 314.09.doc 2 challenged the same order in Civil Appeal No. 5660 of 2010 before the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has set aside the order of this court and remanded the matter back for fresh hearing. In view of this, order dated 21.09.2006 is no more in existence. 3 In view of the facts, the Contempt Petition itself does not survive and stands disposed of as infructuous. (J. H. BHATIA, J.)