IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31165 of 2009 1. Sebalal Paswan, S/o Late Sikam Paswan. 2. Ramanand Paswan, S/o Late Debalal Paswan. 3. Shambhu Paswan, S/o Late Debalal Paswan. 4. Danalal Paswan, S/o Bikan Paswan. 5. Kapildeo Paswan, S/o Bikan Paswan. 6. Anita Devi W/o Binod Paswan. Petitioner No. 1 to 6 residents of village-Thadha-Bhawanipur, P.S.- Balua-Bazar, District-Supaul. 7. Bhola Paswan, S/o Late Bankar Paswan @ Nakchhedi Paswan, resident of village-Bishanpur Gulami, P.S.-Balua-Bazar, District-Supaul. ..................Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ......................Opp. Party. ----------- 2/ 10.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioner Nos. 1 & 4 are elder brothers of the complainant’s husband, petitioner Nos. 2, 3 & 5 are cousins and petitioner No. 6 is second wife of the husband of the complainant, petitioner No. 7 is a villager. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the entire allegation in the F.I.R. regarding torture and demand of dowry is false and concocted. As per the, complainant’s own case after several years of the marriage the demand of dowry was made which itself shows the correctness of the allegation. Considering these facts, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of above named petitioners 2 is allowed, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today and on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D. J. M., Supaul, in connection with Complaint Case No. 256’C’/07 subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. Sanjeet/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)