WP(C) 5815/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Mahmud, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Ghosh, lea rned State counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 5. None appears for the other respondents. The grievance of the petitioners in the present petition is that though the petitioner No.1, namely, Pijush Kanti Das lodged the F.I.R. on 07.09.2010 wi th the Officer-in-charge of Silapathar Police Station, the said F.I.R. has been refused to be registered. The petitioners, therefore, have prayed for a directio n to the respondent authority to register the said F.I.R. and to reinvestigate a nd to submit the report of such investigation in the appropriate criminal Court. The petitioners have also prayed for a direction to make the investigation thro ugh the Central Bureau of Investigation. The petitioners are yet to approach the Superintendent of Police as requ ired under sub-section (3) of Section 154 of the Criminal Procedure Code intimat ing him that the F.I.R. lodged by him has not been registered and no action has been taken. That being the position, the writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners to approach the Superintendent of Police under sub-section ( 3) of Section 154 of the Cr.P.C. In case such approach is made the S.P. shall de finitely look into the matter and pass necessary order in accordance with law im mediately. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.