] $~ * m THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 950/2011 VIJAY MAHAJAN Petitioner Through; iVlr. SanjeevAgarwal,Advocate. versus SUDHIR VASUDEVA Respondent Through: Mr. VipinNair, Mr. P.B. Suresh, Ms. Madhu Bhora & Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocates with Mr. Sunil Johare, Manager (MM) of the Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER ORDER % 23.12.2011 CMNo.23553/2011 (Exemption) Allowed subject to just exceptions. Cont. Gas. rC)No.950/2011 We fmd the conduct of the respondent organization completely unacceptablewherefirstthey show the name of the petitionerunderthe ban orderdespitethe ban orderhavingbeen stayedand WP (C) No.6943/2011is allowedon 14.12.2011givingtwo (2) days' time to rectifythe position,the needful has still not been done. Learned counsel for the respondent, on instructions fi-om Mr. Sunil Johare, Manager (MM) of the petitioner, states that the website has now been rectified and that the petitioner will be permitted to participate in the bid even though the last dateis overandcan collectthe tenderdocuments Cont. Cas. (C) No.950/2011 Page 1of2 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified within a week and submit the same thereafter as the last date for submission has been extended from 26.12.2011 to 9.1.2012. In view of the aforesaid stand of the respondent we desist from issuing notice of contempt but consider it appropriateto direct that the respondent should pay the litigation cost of the present petition to the petitionerquantifiedat^10,000.00. It is opentothe respondentorganization to recover it from the delinquent officer. The petition stands disposedof Dasti to learnedcounselfor the petitionerunder the signaturesof the Court Master. SANJAYKISHXNKAUL, J. DECEMBER 23, 2011 RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. b 'nesh Com. Cas. (C) NO.950/20H Page 2of2