1 RA No.45 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Review Application No.45 of 2011 In Writ Petition No. 8853 Of 2010 Rajureshwar Shikshan PrasarakMandal Takli-Kolte, Taluka Bhokardan. .. Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others. .. Respondents. -------- Shri. K.T. Shirurkar, Advocate for petitioner. Shri. N.H. Borade, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent Nos.1 to 3. -------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE: 16th MARCH 2011 PER COURT: 1) Heard. 2) The grounds raised in the review petition do not commend to us. The learned counsel submits that, the review basically is in respect of last sentence in para 2 of our order passed on 10th February 2011. 2 RA No.45 of 2011 3) We do not find any error in the order passed by us. The review petition is misconceived. 4) The review application is dismissed. Sd/- Sd/- (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl