IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 9TH APRIL 2010 / 19TH CHAITHRA 1932 RP.No. 377 of 2010() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.8983/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS: --------------------------------------------------------- 1. ANILKUMAR, S/O.KARUNAKARAN, AGED 53 YEARS, SREEVILASAM, AMBALAKKARA HOUSE, KIZHAKKEKARA, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM. 2. BAIJU K., SREEVILASAM, AMBALAKKARA BUNGLOW, THRIKKANANMANGAL, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHANDAS RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------------------ 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM. 2. THE KOTTARAKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH (THROUGH) THE SECRETARY, KOTTARAKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, PULAMON P.O., KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KOTTARAKKARA VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA. 4. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS, KOLLAM. 5. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF SURVEY, KOLLAM. GOVT.PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA SRI.C.J.JOY, SC FOR PANCHAYAT THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ R.P.No.377 OF 2010 IN W.P.(C) NO. 8983 OF 2010 (W) ===================== Dated this the 9th day of April, 2010 O R D E R I do not find any merit in this review petition. However, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that pending consideration of the matter as directed in the judgment, the Panchayat may be directed to consider their request for numbering the building. 2. Having regard to the nature of the controversy which is still remaining unresolved, it is not possible for this Court to issue any such positive direction. However, if the Panchayat is willing, it is upto them to deal with any such request. Review petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp