IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10170 of 2010 1. SAROJ DEVI, W/O SHRAVAN KUMAR, R/O MOHALLA PREM NAGAR EAST UNTA, P.S. JAHANABAD, DISTRICT-JAHANABAD. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,JEHANABAD. 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE,JEHANABAD. 4. THE CIRCLE OFFICER,JEHANABAD. 5. GANESH DAS, S/O CHALITAR DAS, R/O MOHALLA PREM NAGAR EAST UNTA, P.S. JEHANABAD, DISTRICT-JEHANABAD. ----------- 2. 02.12.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Counsel for the State and the learned Counsel for private Respondent no. 5. Learned Counsel for the State very fairly acknowledges that the order of the Sub Divisional Officer on 25.2.2010 for removal of encroachment in pursuance of Encroachment Case No. 2 of 2007-2008 with regard to Khata no. 56, Plot no. 426 Gairmazarua Aam is required to be implemented in accordance with law. In view of the stand taken on behalf of the State no further orders are required from the Court except an observation that the Court expects the respondent State authorities to act in accordance with their stand taken before the Court with regard to the order dated 25.2.2010 expeditiously. At this stage, learned Counsel for Respondent no. 5 submits that he has filed an application before the Commissioner against the order dated 25.2.2010. Needless to state that if the order dated 25.2.2010 has been questioned before a superior authority in accordance with statutory provisions, any compliance of the order dated 25.2.2010 has to be only in accordance with any orders that the superior/appellate authority may pass against the same in exercise of its statutory powers and not otherwise. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)