IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRL W P No. 38 of 2010 Date of decision: 19.01.2010 Mosam ........ petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Mahabir Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Pardeep Virk, DAG, Haryana for the respondent- State Mr. Surender Saini, Advocate for the complainant -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Pursuance to the order dated 07.01.2010 a report has been filed by the Warrant Officer. As per the report, the owner of the Brick Kiln had no objection if the petitioner and his men leave the premises. Accordingly, the petitioner and others were allowed to leave the premises along with their belongings. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, states that he does not wish to pursue the matter further and that the petition be dismissed as infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge January 19, 2010 mohan