IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23380 of 2010 RAM CHANDRA SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR -------- 2. 03.08.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in prayer portion of the petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 457, 482, 483, 486, 419, 420 of the I.P.C. and Sections 63 and 65 of the Copyright Act. It is alleged that on raid being conducted in the rented house of Rakesh Kumar 50 Tins of adulterated mustard oil was recovered. From perusal of the F.I.R. it appears that Rakesh Kumar was the tenant in the house of this petitioner. From the F.I.R. it does not appear that the police suspected any hands of this petitioner in manufacturing of adulterated mustard oil. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the fact that the main allegation is against Rakesh Kumar and the recovery has also been made from him and not - 2 - from the petitioner, let the petitioner, Ram Chandra Sah, be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Muzaffaprur Town P.S. Case No. 488 of 2009, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Muzaffarpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)