c . [06 L. TJV HON'BLE HIGff COVRT OF CHHATTISGARH .runrcATURB AT BILASPU'R w,P. / S.i No. 6^(Q> /2011 PETITIONER: - ^-•. ^>^ ^c^ <^'y .^y ^-" ^•^ RBSPONDENTS:- T.R.Sahu S/o Shri Sonsau Sahu Aaed aboiit 51 vears OcciiDcition —Male.Health Suoendsor .Sector Ganeivada Block DanteiL'ada, District - Danteviada Soufh Bastar (C. G.) VERSUS ^l.Stccte of Chhattisaarh Throuah , Secre.taru , Denartment of Health and Fnmilu welfcire Mantralaua. D.K.S. Bhawan. Rai.nurfC. G..) 2- C'.ollector . Da.nteiua.da . District - Dantewada Sou.th BastarfC. G. 1 3. Chief Medical and Health Officer , Danteivctda. District - Dantewada South Bastar (C. G.) <s^ ^ WRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLB 226/227 OF T1SB CONSTTTUTION OP INDIA /-? a» 1. <• ^' N1 ashok RESPONDENTS HiGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 6S13QF2011 T.R. Sahu Vereus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Ms. Deepali Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Government Advocate for the State. ORDER (Passed on this 23 day of Novsmber, 2011) 1. Learned counsei appearing for the petilioner submits that vide order dated 27.08.2011 (Annexure P/1), the petitioner, working as Male Health Suf»rvisor at Sector Ganewaia, Block Dantewada, District Dantewada, has been transferred to Community Heaith Centre, Chhura, Ostrict Raipur, on his own request. However, the petitioner has not yet been reiieved to Jointhe new piace of posting. Ms. Deepali Pandey, further submits that once the order of transfer has been passed, it is for the government to ensure that it is compiied with immediateiy. She relies on a decision of the Supreme Court in Sreedam Chandra Ghcsh v. State af Assam & others, m support of her contention that if the order is not complied with, a direction can be issued for enforoement thereof. 2. Shri Sao, leamed Govemment Advocate appearing Tor the State/ respondents submits that if the fransfer order dated 27.08.2011 (Annexure P/1) is still in existence and has not been complied with,appropriate steps would be taken to comply with the prder. if the aforesaid transfer order is stili in existence and no other order has been passed, the government is under anobligation 1o comply with the same at •" once. It is accordingiy directed that the transfer order shall be complied with forthwith, wrthin a period of two weeks. Accordinalv. this oetition stands disposed of. _ ——. 3. 4. (1996) 10 SCC 567 Sd/- SATISH K. ANGNIHOW Judge