IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6375 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision: 19th November, 2008 Vijay Kumar … Petitioner Versus Smt. Santosh Singhal and others … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Gorakh Nath, Advocate for the petitioner. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Mr. Gorakh Nath is present along with Mr. Vijay Kumar tenant petitioner. At the outset, Mr. Gorakh Nath appearing for the tenant petitioner has stated that he has been instructed by the tenant petitioner that in case reasonable time is granted, he will not pursue the present revision petition. Mr.Gorakh Nath has further stated that there is concurrent finding of fact recorded by two courts below that the premises are required for use and occupation of Vipul Kumar, son of the landlady Smt.Santosh Singhal. Mr.Gorakh Nath has stated that in case his alternative prayer is accepted and nine months’ time is granted for handing over the peaceful vacant possession, present petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. I find merit in the alternative prayer made by Mr.Gorakh Nath on instructions from Vijay Kumar, tenant petitioner, who is stated to be present in Court. Accordingly, petitioner is granted nine months time to vacate the premises, subject to filing an undertaking that he shall hand over peaceful vacant possession after nine months commencing from 1st December, 2008 and he shall further pay the use and occupation charges to the landlady. The use and occupation charges are determined as Civil Revision No. 6375 of 2008 Rs.1268/-, which according to Mr.Vijay Kumar was the rent paid earlier. The undertaking shall also contain a condition that the entire arrears of rent shall be paid at the time of filing of undertaking, which is to be filed on or before 1st December, 2008 in the Court of concerned Rent Controller. Thereafter, use and occupation charges, as determined above, shall be paid or tendered on or before 7th of each following month. In view of the observations made above, Mr.Gorakh Nath, on instructions from Mr.Vijay Kumar petitioner tenant, has stated that the present revision petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. As prayed, dismissed as withdrawn. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE November 19, 2008 rps 2