IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 13938 of 2002 Between: 1 Reddy Rama Rao S/o Reddy Gowraiah D.No. 19-5-18, Varma Vari Veedhi, Muthasetty Vari Palem, Tenali. 2 Sajjevarapu Devamani W/o S. Prasad R/o D.No. 19-11-1, Battavari Street, Muthemsetty Vari Palem, Tenali. 3 Mangaraju Vijaya Kumari W/o M. Prabhakar R/o D.No. 19-11-2, Battavari Street, Muthemsetty Vari Palem, Tenali. 4 Darla Devamani W/o Darla Irmaiah R/o D.No. 19-11-2A, Battavari Street, Muthemsetty Vari Palem, Tenali. 5 Dasari Chakri W/o Dasari Subbarao R/o D.No. 19-11-3, Battavari Street, Muthemsetty Vari Palem, Tenali. 6 Mangalagiri Srinivasa Rao W/o Mangalagiri Pothuraju R/o D.No. 19-14-38, Battavari Street, Muthemsetty Vari Palem, Tenali. 7 Tullimilli Gopala Rao S/o T. Sambaiah R/o D.No. 19-14-37, Battavari Street, Muthemsetty Vari Palem, Tenali. ..... PETITIONERS AND The Tenali Municipality, Rep. by its Commissioner, Tenali, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.RAVI SHANKAR JANDHYALA Counsel for the Respondent: --- The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an order or orders more especially one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing the impugned notice No. 577/02/G/[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] dated 17-7-2002 respectively, for eviction from their respective residences/houses, bearing house Nos. D.No. 19-5-18, Varma Vari Veedhi, Muthemsetty Varipalem, [2] D.No. 19-11-1, [3] D.No. 19-11-2 [4] D.No. 19-11-2A [5] D.No.19-11-3 [6] D.No.19-14-38, [7] D.No. 19-14-37 of Battavari Street, Muthemsetty Varipalem, Tenali, without showing alternative accommodation as illegal, arbitrary, capricious violative of principles of natural justice and consequentially direct the respondent not to evict the petitioner from their respective houses bearing Nos. D.No. 19-5-18, Varma Vari Veedhi, Muthemsetty Vari Palem, [2] D.No. 19-11-1, [3] D.No. 19-11-2, [4] D.No. 19- 11-2A, [5] D.No. 19-11-3, [6] D.No. 19-14-38, [7] D.No. 19-14-37 of Battavari Street, Muthemsetty Varipalem, Tenali consequent upon the issuance of notice in proceedings No. 577/02/G[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] dated 17-7- 2002 of the respondent” At the hearing, Sri Ravi Shankar Jandhyala, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 27th February, 2009 vrn