Crl. Misc. No.M-38023 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-38023 of 2010 Date of Decision: 24.12.2010 Mangal Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. B.S. Bajwa, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 to 4 to hold an enquiry and register an FIR against respondents No.5 to 14 as they have in connivance with each other performed second marriage of Sandeep Kaur and prays for issuance of directions to hold the respondents in contempt of court as they have attained order dated 29.11.2010 passed in Crl. Misc. No.M-34882 of 2010 by forging the documents and by concealing the material and true facts from this Court. No doubt, it is correct that Sandeep Kaur and Sarabjit Singh filed Crl. Misc. No.M-34882 of 2010 in this Court seeking protection to their lives and liberty from the hands of respondents No.6 to 10 in the said Crl. Misc. Petition. However, the petitioners approached for protection to this Court so that they are not physically harmed. No one is allowed to take Crl. Misc. No.M-38023 of 2010 2 law in their own hands. Every citizen has a right to be protected against any physical harm being caused to them. Accordingly, a direction was issued to the concerned Senior Superintendent of Police to look into the grievances of the petitioners and if found necessary, take appropriate measures, in accordance with law. The said order does not mean that no action can be initiated against the petitioners in the said Crl. Misc. Petition or any one else if they are found guilty of having committing any criminal offence. Any offence, if committed is a separate cause of action for which, they are always liable. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in the above terms with liberty to the petitioner to` approach the appropriate authority for the redressal of their grievances and avail of the alternative remedy as available under law. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 24.12.2010 JUDGE gurpreet