IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.3684 of 2010 Date of decision: 27.5.2010 Diwan Khan and another ......Petitioner(s) Versus Gram Panchayat village Uchana and others ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Sonia G. Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral) Vide this revision petition, the petitioners have challenged the impugned order dated 16.11.2009 passed by the trial Court on an application filed by the petitioners for clarification of order dated 5.9.2005 whereby the parties were directed to maintain status quo regarding possession till the next date of hearing which was 14.11.2005. As per averments, on 14.11.2005, the Presiding Officer of the trial Court was on leave and therefore, the case was taken up on an earlier date and was adjourned to 18.1.2006 on which date, the suit was dismissed in default. The suit was restored on 29.4.2006. It has been further submitted that now the respondents are claiming that there was no stay order in favour of the petitioners and therefore, necessity arose to seek clarification of the aforesaid order dated 5.9.2005. The trial Court after noticing all the facts, including that the aforesaid stay order dated 5.9.2005 which was only till the next date of hearing i.e 14.11.2005, was never extended, clarified the order holding that the stay order dated 5.9.2005 was not extended. Challenging the aforesaid order, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that there was no specific order for vacating the stay order, therefore it was presumed to be continuing and thus, the CR No.3684 of 2010 -2- clarification given by the Court vide impugned order is erroneous and is liable to be set aside. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order and the contents of this petition. Status quo order dated 5.9.2005 was passed till next date of hearing and the same was not extended after 14.11.2005. Even the aforesaid stay order was not extended after restoration of the case on 29.4.2006. Moreover, the order stands clarified by the trial Court that it was for a specific date. Thus, I find no fault in the impugned order. Dismissed. May 27, 2010 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE