IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 19TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 28TH KARTHIKA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 7303 of 2010 (E) ----------------------------- (CRIME NO.685 OF 2010 OF ERITTY POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTICT) PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS. 5 TO 12, 14 TO 18 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A.P.KUNJAHAMMED, S/O.MOIDEEN HAJI, AGED 65 YEARS, KAVUMPADI, THILLANKERRI.P.O. 2. P.P.ALI, S/O.KUNJAMI, AGED 30 YEARS, KAVUMPADI, THILLANKERRI.P.O. 3. N.K.MUNIR, S/O.ABUTTY, AGED 27 YEARS, KAVUMPADI, THILLANKERRI.P.O. 4. SHAHEER.K., S/O.MAMMED, AGED 22 YEARS, KAVUMPADI, THILLANKERRI.P.O. 5. MUSA.K., S/O.MOIDEEN, AGED 23 YEARS, KAVUMPADI, THILLANKERRI.P.O. 6. K.SUBAIR, S/O.KATHISOMA, AGED 25 YEARS, KAVUMPADI, THILLANKERRI.P.O. 7. K.BASHEER, S/O.MOIDEEN, AGED 25 YEARS, KAVUMPADI, THILLANKERRI.P.O. 8. K.SUBAIR, S/O.BHIYATHUMA, AGED 30 YEARS, KAVUMPADI, THILLANKERRI.P.O. 9. P.MUSA, S/O.AYAMUHAJI, AGED 60 YEARS, KAVUMPADI, THILLANKERRI. 10. JAFFAR, S/O.ERAMULLAN, AGED 26 YEARS, CHOLAYL, KAVUMPADI, THILLANKERRI.P.O. 11. C.ANTHRU, S/O.MOIDEENKUTTY, AGED 46 YEARS, CHAKIYAD, KAVUMPADI, THILLANKERRI.P.O. 12. N.K.PARIYAI, S/O.MAMOOTTY HAJI, AGED 25 YEARS, ERAKANDY, KAVUMPADI, THILLANKERRI.P.O. 13. T.JAMSHEER, S/O.USMAN, AGED 22 YEARS, RAMLA MANZIL, KAVUMPADI, THILLANKERRI.P.O. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.HABEEB RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT ------------------------------------------------ STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ERITTY POLICE STATION, THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COMR UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: VK V. RAMKUMAR, J. ............................... B.A. No. 7303 of 2010 .......................................... Dated: 19th day of November, 2010 ORDER Petitioners, who are accused Nos. 5 to 12 and 14 to 18 in Crime No.685/2010 of Eritty Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 452, 427 and 353 read with 149 I.P.C. and Section 3(1) of P.D.P.P Act, Section 137, 138(A) of Panchayat Raj Act, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application. 3. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. But at the same time, I am inclined to permit the petitioners to surrender before the Investigating Officer for the purpose of interrogation and then to have their application for bail considered by the Magistrate having jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petitioners shall surrender before the investigating officer on 29.11.2010 or on 30.11.2010 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery of incriminating material, if any. The petitioners shall thereafter be produced before the Magistrate who on being satisfied that the petitioners have been interrogated by the police shall consider and dispose of their application for regular bail preferably on the same date on which it is filed. This petition is disposed of as above. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE dmb