1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.20 OF 2006 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO._____ OF 2006 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL ST.NO.26270 OF 2005 IN CIVIL SUIT NO.21 OF 2005 Union of India. ...Appellant/Applicant. vs. M/s.M.V.Patel & Co. ...Respondent(orig.claimant) --- Mrs.S.V.Deshpande, for Appellant. Mrs. V.A.Modak with K.M.Jawle, for Respondent. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH,J. DATED: 8th November, 2006. P.C. The learned Counsel appearing for respondent states that the statements made in paragraph 3 of the application that Advocate Mr.Kishore Jawale informed the applicant/appellant that he is appearing on behalf of the respondent is correct. In view of this position, the applicant/appellant was justified in not effecting service. The Civil Application is therefore, granted in terms of prayer clause (a). ----