1 wp329310 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3293 OF 2010 Kishore Kumar Gulab Parmar ...Petitioner VERSUS Inspector General of Prisons, Pune, & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. V.N. Tripathi for the Petitioner Mr. A.S. Gadkari, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATE: 2ND DECEMBER, 2010 P.C.:- The limited grievance made in this petition is that the petitioner’s case for premature release has been considered on the basis of Guidelines of 1992, whereas the Guidelines of 2008 are more favourable to the petitioner. By now, it is well established that the authority has to consider the case of premature release of the convict on the basis of the latest Guidelines if the same are favourable to the convict, as observed by the Apex Court in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. v. Jagdish, reported in (2010) 4 SCC 216. 2 wp329310 2. In the circumstances, we dispose of this petition with direction to the Appropriate Authority to re-consider the case of the petitioner and take fresh decision as may be advised in accordance with law. That be done as expeditiously as possible, and in any case, not later than three months from today. A.P. BHANGALE, J. A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.