IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11918 of 2006 Dhruv Narayan Singh, son of Shri Sheo Shankar Prasad, Resident of village & P.O.- Jamunia, Via-Ghorasahan, P.S.-Jharokhar, District-East Champaran. …………. Petitioner. VERSUS 1. The State of Bihar through the Director (Youth & Welfare), Human Resources Department, Patna. 2. The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Chhajjubagh, Patna. 3. The Principal, S.M. Zaheer Alam Physical & Teacher’s Training College, Bahera, Darbhanga. 4. Regional Director, N.C.T.E., Bhuneshwar. ……… Respondents. WITH CWJC No.3203 of 2007 Wakil Lal Deo, son of Late Kunji Lal Deo, Resident of village & P.O.-Waligaon, Via- Anandpur, District-Drbhanga. …….. Petitioner. VERSUS 1. The State of Bihar through the Director (Youth & Welfare), Human Resources Department, Patna. 2. The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Chhajjubagh, Patna. 3. The Principal, S.M. Zaheer Alam Physical & Teacher’s Training College, Bahera, Darbhanga. 4. Regional Director, N.C.T.E., Bhuneshwar. …… Respondents. ----------- Counsel for the Petitioners : Mr. A. A. Khan, Adv. Counsel for the Board : Mr. Lalit Kishore, Sr. Adv. Counsel for the N.C.T.E. : Mr. S.N.Pathak. Counsel for the State : Mr. S.S. Prasad Sinha. ------------ 05 19.02.2009 Petitioners were student of an institution, which pursuant to High Court directions got recognition. Petitioners were permitted to appear in the Primary Teachers Training Examination conducted by the Bihar School Examination Board. Subsequently, the permanent recognition granted was cancelled and the institution was derecognized. Petitioners have now come to this Court for declaration of their results. 2 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that when the petitioners took the admission in course, studied and gave examination, the institution was duly recognized, subsequently derecognized, with giving right to move against the institution, but they should not make the students suffer. In my view, Sri Lalit Kishore, learned senior counsel appearing for the Bihar School Examination Board has rightly relied on a judgment in the case of L. Muthukumar and another Vs. The State of Tamilnadu since reported in (2000) 7 Supreme Court 618, wherein the Apex Court virtually on the same argument had held that once the institution was derecognized then students could not claim declaration of results or issuance of certificates in this regard, even though, when they took the examination, the institution enjoyed the recognition. In that view of the matter, the two writ petitions are dismissed. Trivedi/ (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)