IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revision No. 2234 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: September 22, 2011 Bijender .. Petitioner Vs. Smt. Manju and another .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Ramender Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N. Jindal, J Assailed in this petition is the order dated 1.6.2011 passed by the learned District Judge, Family Court, Bhiwani, awarding maintenance to the tune of `3000/- per month to the respondent No.1- wife and `2000/- per month to the respondent No.2- minor child. The petitioner is serving as Constable in Indian Army and is drawing salary of `24,000/- per month. The respondents being the wife and minor child are liable to be maintained by him. Nothing has come on record that they are having source of income to maintain themselves. The learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the respondent is living in adultery, but no evidence has been led by him before the Family Court, Bhiwani in order to prove that she has been living in adultery. Such allegations rather prove the utter negligence on the part of the husband. The trial court has awarded quite reasonable amount as maintenance to the respondents. Even otherwise, this revision petition is barred by limitation. Consequently, finding no merit in the petition the same is dismissed.. September 22, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge