IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15874 of 2009 1. PANKAJ JHUNJHUNWALA @ PANKAJ KUMAR 2. Manish Taluka Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 5/ 14.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that all the allegations are false. This case has been lodged at the instigation of Ram Prasad Sharaf with whom complainant was working, as his domestic servant and he has every grudge against the petitioners for the differences of his sister namely, Priyanka and her husband Kaushal Sharaf and now, parties have already compromised the case. Keeping in view the nature of the allegation, liberal view is justified but not by this Court rather by the Trial Court as anticipatory bail petition is not maintainable before this Court. Senior most additional District Judge at the station is designated Special Court for the offence under Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (prevention of atrocities) Act so that the Court should not remain vacant. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is rejected. However, petitioners are directed to surrender before the Court below and pray for regular bail, which shall be decided on the same day, if possible, without being prejudiced by the rejection order and taking into consideration the compromise in between the parties for taking liberal view. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)