IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No.146 of 2009 Abhishek Kumar ……….. Petitioner Versus Secretary, Department of Cane Development and Sugar Industry, Government of Uttarakhand and three others ....……… Respondents Coram:- Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, Chief Justice Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, Judge Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. P.C. Bisht, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for respondent No.3. None for respondent No.4. Date of Decision: 22.04.2010 J.S. Khehar, C.J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondents state, that the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Since none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, we have no option but to accept the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents. The instant writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Liberty is, however, given to the petitioner to move a civil miscellaneous application to revive the instant writ petition, in case the same has not been rendered infructuous. ( Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. ) ( J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 22.04.2010 P.Singh