IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40707 of 2009 SUDARSHAN SINGH, son of Ramashish Singh, resident of Village – Belhar, Police station – Sasaram (M), Dorigaon, Rohtas Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04. 18.12.2009 Petitioner happens to be the husband who has been charged under sections 304B of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act. The case is Complaint Case No. 363 of 2008. Submission of the counsel for the petitioner is that the complaint case by itself is a give away to the whole story. There are certain evidence to show that the wife of the petitioner namely, Anita Devi who was seen walking out of the house of the petitioner and thereafter she has not been heard of. Taking advantage of such a situation the present case has been filed. It is also indication that complainant initially tried to raise the issue in a local Gram Panchayat and when he did not get adequate support, he filed the present complaint case. Keeping in mind the circumstances to the lodging of the complaint and the material, let the petitioner Sudarshan Singh be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in Complaint Case No. 363 of 2008. One of the surety will be executed by the father of the petitioner and other by a close relation on due identification. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)