-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION No. 3740 of 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1491 OF 2010 . Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s orders. Mr Rajesh Datar for the Applicant/Appellant. Mr Dilip Bodke for the Respondents. Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : 12th October, 2011. P. C. :- 1. Heard Mr Datar, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr Bodke, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The civil application is preferred by the applicant/original appellant for injunction restraining the respondents from creating third party interest on the suit property. The appellant is the original plaintiff, in the suit filed for specific performance of the agreement which has been dismissed by the trial Court. During the pendency of the suit, the appellant filed an application for temporary injunction, restraining the respondents from creating third party interest in the suit -: 2 :- property. However, the trial Court did not grant any interim relief of injunction in favour of the appellant. Admittedly, there was no injunction in force against the present respondents during the pendency of the suit. The interest of the appellant is protected in view of the provisions of Section 52A of the Transfer of the Property Act. In these circumstances, I am not inclined to grant prayer of temporary injunction made by the appellant in the present application. Same is, therefore, rejected. (RANJIT MORE, J.)