1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3601/1998 (Satya Narain Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) Date of Order :: 26.05.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr.Hemant Shrimalee, for the petitioner. Mr.Deepak Choudhary, Dy. Govt. Counsel. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition for compliance of the judgment rendered by this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2108/1993 decided on 27th January, 1993. After issuing notices to the respondents a specific plea has been taken by the respondents that no junior person than the petitioner was ever promoted on the post of LDC. This assertion is clear from Annexure-R/2 dated 28th June, 1993 filed by the respondents in compliance of the judgment passed by this Court. Upon perusal of whole pleadings of the case, it clearly appears that there is no evidence with regard to promotion of any junior person. However, in my opinion, the 2 department has already complied with the direction issued by this Court vide judgment 27th January, 1993 by way of passing order dated 28th June, 1993 (Annexure-R/2), therefore, there is no force in this writ petition. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. However, if petitioner is having any grievance against the said order (Annexure-R/2), then he can agitate his matter afresh. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS),J. A.K. Chouhan/-