IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.169 OF 2010 Trilok Chand Gupta ………Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others …Respondents Dated: March 12, 2010 Sri Rajendra Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Sri M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State HON. DHARAM VEER, J. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed to issue writ of certiorari quashing the FIR in case crime no.56 of 2010 u/s 420/467/468/471 IPC P.S. Ranipur Distt. Haridwar. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the entire material on record. In brief the prosecution case is that the petitioner has forged the signatures of Peshkar in the Writ Petition No.12 of 2010 (M/S), summon dated 26.11.2009 and application dated 26.11.2009. After coming to know about the said facts, the Additional District Magistrate, Haridwar Administration conducted an enquiry and gave a report that in the Annexures NO.9, 10 and 11, the petitioner has deliberately and intentionally made forgery and also made fraudulent signatures of Peshkar. On a careful perusal of the contents of the FIR, hearing the learned counsel for the parties, it transpires that prima facie there is sufficient evidence against the petitioner and the offence punishable u/s 420/467/468/471 of the IPC is made out against the petitioner on the basis of the averments made in the FIR as well as on perusal of the other papers on record. After considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case and upon hearing learned counsel for the parties as well as on perusal of FIR and other documents and on record, the petitioner is not entitled for any relief by this Court and the petition is liable to be dismissed summarily. The writ petition is, therefore, devoid of merits and is dismissed in limine. (Dharam Veer, J.) 12.03.2010 Rajeev Dang