IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7069 of 2010 01. RAM BINAY SINGH @ BIRENDRA SHARMA 02. Chintoo Sharma @ Bhagwan Das Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 08.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The defence of the petitioners in a police case under Sections 328, 302/34 of the Penal Code is that the deceased was married to the son of petitioner no.1 in 1995 itself, when the latter was deceased in 1999. All these years till 21.12.2009 there have been no allegations. The defence, therefore, is that the deceased died of ailments for which she was under treatment as stated in the F.I.R. itself. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Jehanabad in connection with Mahendiya P.S. Case No. 86 of 2009. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)