1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. O R D E R Prithvi Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5512/2008 Date of Order : : 11/08/2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R. PANWAR Mr.S.D.Vyas, for the petitioner. Mr.O.P.Boob, Addl.Government counsel. BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties. The only grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner has filed an application under Section 144 CPC for restitution in compliance with the decision of respondent Board of Revenue in Appeal/Ceiling/19/97/Ajmer dated 11.11.1998 before the Authorized Authority SDO, Fatehgarh, District Jaisalmer and the same has not yet been decided. There is no reason to keep the application pending for indefinite period. The application is said to have been filed in the year 2 2006 and there can be no reason for not deciding the same expeditiously. In the circumstances, therefore, it is appropriate to direct the respondent Authorized Authority-cum-Sub Division Officer, Fatehgarh, District Jaisalmer to hear and decide the application filed by the petitioner under Section 144 CPC utmost expeditiously preferably within a period of one month from the date of producing the certified copy of the order. With these observations, the instant writ petition is disposed of. (H.R. PANWAR), J. NK 3 S.B.CIVIL MISC.STAY APPLICATION NO.9869/2008 IN S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION 5512/2008 Date of order : : 11.08.2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.S.D.Vyas, for the petitioner Mr.O.P.Boob, Addl.Govt.counsel Since the writ petition itself has been disposed of, the stay petition also stands disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR), J. NK