IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 8TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 19TH MAGHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 820 of 2011() --------------------------------------- C.P.NO.1/2006 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-II, KOTTARAKKARA. CRIME NO.392/2004 OF CHADAYAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DIST. ...................... PETITIONER/IST ACCUSED --------------------------------------- NAJEEMUDEEN, S/O.MUHAMMED HANEEFA, AGED 30 YEARS, MALATHIL VEEDU, KAITHODU, NILAMEL VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI. K.SIJU, SMT.BINDU GEORGE. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHADAYAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR.M.S. BREEZ. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/02/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: rs V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Bail Application No.820 of 2011 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 08.02.2011 ORDER Petitioner, who is the 1st accused in L.P.No.3/2009 on the file of Assistant Sessions Court, Kottarakkara, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. Admittedly non-bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioner. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Court below and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the court below and files an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of, preferably, on the same date on which it is filed notwithstanding the pendency of non-bailable warrants of arrest against the petitioner. This Bail Application is, accordingly, disposed of. Dated this the 8th day of February, 2011 V. RAMKUMAR,(JUDGE) sj