IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 14966 of 2011 Date of decision : August 17, 2011 Rishu Hooda and others ....Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal Present : Mr. Ravinder Malik, Advocate, for the petitioners L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners would be satisfied if respondent no. 3 is directed to decide representation Annexure P/11 made by the petitioners within fixed time frame. In view of the aforesaid limited prayer but without entering into merits of the claim of the petitioners, the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent no. 3 to decide representation Annexure P/11 made by the petitioners within two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law. If the representation is proposed to be rejected, then speaking reasoned order shall be passed. ( L.N. Mittal ) August 17, 2011 Judge 'dalbir'