1 appw391.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Application no. 391 of 2010 IN Writ Petition No. 2883 of 2010 The State of Maharashtra ..Applicant v/s. Jignesh Jasawantrai Shah & ors. ..Respondents Mr. P.A. Pol-PP for the applicant. Mr. Sanjiv Sawant-advocate for respondents (orig. petitioners in WP) Mr. V.V. Purwant-advocate for respondent no.1. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR & A.P. BHANGALE, JJ DATED :- NOVEMBER 16, 2010. P.C. The Application is taken out by the prosecution essentially on the assertion that inspite of assurance given by the Respondent Nos. 1-4 that they would co-operate with the investigation, they have failed to do so. Counsel for the said Respondents on instructions states that without accepting the grievance of the Applicant, the said Respondents would make 2 appw391.10.sxw themselves available in the concerned police station tomorrow at 3.00 p.m. and even thereafter, as and when required in connection with the investigation of the case. 2. In view of this assurance, Learned Public Prosecutor submits that no order be passed on the present Application but liberty be reserved to the Applicant to move Application for further reliefs as may be required. Therefore, without going into the correctness of the grievance, Application is disposed of with liberty to the Applicant, in view of the assurance given by the Respondent through Counsel to the Court as recorded earlier which is accepted. (A.P.BHANGALE, J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)