IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.858 of 2011 MEENA DEVI …….Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 11.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K.S.P.Singh, learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 08.09.2010 in a case registered under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that entire in-law’s family including the petitioner had torturing the victim for non-fulfillment of dowry demand of Rs. One lac cash and a colour TV. It is also alleged that during the reconciliation this petitioner her husband and other gave threatening to the informant side. From the impugned order itself it is apparent that the father-in- law and sister-in-law have been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 37272 of 2009 and Cr. Misc. No. 8332 of 2008. From the accusation made in the FIR the case of the petitioner cannot be distinguished from father- in-law. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the - 2 - petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Chapara, District- Saran in connection with Sonepur P.S. Case No. 168 of 2007 corresponding to U.T. No. 171 of 2010. From the impugned order it appears that the trial of the other accused persons are going on. In that view of the matter, learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner, if petitioner fails to appear before the court on three consecutive dates fixed in the case. Bhardwaj (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)