(1) wp2608-07 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2608 OF 2007 Lukmanbhai Ahmedbhai Thekiya PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others RESPONDENTS .... Mr. S.T. Veer, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.K. Kadam, A.G.P. for the respondent/State. Mr. S.S. Bora, advocate for the respondent No. 3. Mr. V.P. Kadam, advocate for the respondent No. 4. .... CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 23rd JUNE, 2011 ORAL ORDER : 1. The petition has been filed by a person who claims to own a plot of land which is adjoining to the plot in which a school is being run by the respondent No. 4. The main contention of the petitioner is that the Municipal Authority i.e. the respondent No. 3 had not taken any action against the respondent No.4 for running a school in an Industrial Zone. (2) wp2608-07 2. Mr. Bora, appearing for the respondent No. 3, places before us the order passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Parbhani on 23rd February, 2004 in Regular Civil Suit No. 289/2003 (marked "X") wherein the interim relief application preferred by the respondent No. 4 has been granted. Accordingly, the defendant in the suit i.e. the Municipal Council, Parbhani has been restrained from removing the construction of the plaintiff i.e. the respondent No. 4 in the present writ petition, till disposal of the Suit. 3. In our opinion, the petitioner has not made out case for granting him any relief. In any event, we find that the petitioner has not established his locus to maintain the present writ petition. The petition is dismissed. [M.T. JOSHI, J.] [SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.] NPJ/wp2608-07