IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.18033 of 2011 Tetari Devi, wife of Tulsi Das, resident of village – Gurwalia, P.S. – Manuapul, Bettiah, District – West Champaran. -------- Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Shiv Balak Yadav, son of Late Sukat Yadav, resident of village – Sonwal Godown, P.S. – Paharpur (Malahi), District – East Champaran. ----Opposite Party ******** With Criminal Miscellaneous No.18683 of 2011 Akhilesh Yadav, son of Tulsi Yadav, resident of village – Gurwalia, P.S. – Mahuapul, Bettiah, District – West Champaran. -------- Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Shiv Balak Yadav, son of Late Sukat Yadav 3. Anita Devi, wife of Akhilesh Yadav, D/o – Shiv Balak Yadav, both opposite parties no. 2 and 3 are resident of village – Sonwal Godown, P.S. – Paharpur (Malahi), District – East Champaran. ----------Opposite Parties. ****** 06. 14.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Paharpur P.S. Case No. 187/2010 for offences under Sections 323/326/307/498(A)/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Counter affidavit has been filed. Petitioners are respectively husband and in-laws of opposite party no. 3 who is daughter of complainant informant opposite party no. 2. Submission of Bar is that opposite party no. 3 suffered some paralytic attack and is still under treatment. Petitioners intend to resume and continue the relationship and take her due care and also provide suitable treatment. Opposite parties also give positive response by filing counter affidavit. In view of the above, in the event of filing joint petition of compromise or individual petition on behalf of the petitioners, and in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with Paharpur P.S. Case No. 187/2010, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition with respect to petitioner Akhilesh Yadav, (in Cr. Misc. No. 18683/2011), to attend the court regularly till disposal of the case, in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled, further additional condition in case of filing individual petition on behalf of the petitioner the court below on getting positive response from the complainant or filing joint petition of compromise permit the victim (opposite party no. 3) to go along with the petitioners and reside at their place and both the couple report personally on the date fixed for the purpose and only after being satisfied of their conduct for a reasonable period court below shall pass appropriate order in accordance with law. Rajeev/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)