IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM No. 27177 of 2010 and CRR No.1440 of 2010 Date of decision:- 26.08.2011 Iqbal Singh ....Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present:- Mr. Tarsem Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) There are no plausible grounds for condoning the delay of 94 days in filing the present revision petition. Even otherwise, on scrutiny of the impugned judgment, it transpires that the 'khata' in dispute is joint between the parties, therefore, the accused were also the co-sharers of the land. In such circumstances, no offence of criminal trespass is made out. The trial Court appears to have appreciated the evidence in the right perspective. No such illegality or irregularity in the impugned judgment has been detected, warranting interference by this Court at this revisional stage. Dismissed. (A.N.JINDAL) 26th August, 2011 JUDGE ajp