EN THE HIGH QQURT OF JUDICATURE AT BIUXSPURQCHHKTTISGARH) WRIT PETITIOE: m. i573 _12002_ PETIOEEER Smt.Joginder Kaur: S/o. Daljeet Sing‘n, AbWed about 55 years, R/o. Shiv Talkies Chowk, Bilasggur, Tahsil & Dist“ Bigaspur (c.G.) VersuS .‘¥ 12:3sygmms 1 . Collector, Bilaslsur (C .G .) Comissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur (CeG .) Joint Director, Town é: Country Planning Eept’c" Bilaspur (CgGJ Vii/V WRIT PETKTEOH UNDER ARTICIE ‘22§/227 OF TEE CONSTITUTION OF ENDIA FGR ISSUANCE O}? WRI‘T IN THE NATURE OF i‘ylxNDi—XMUS’ CERTEOWXRI, PROHIBI'I‘ION OR ANY SUITABLE ‘EIRI'I‘ OR WRIT§, 9RDER OR ORDERS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. l/ TI WW, waw a W /2002\ “mt ww (W) :§$i2gg WWW WWW Emm§a%aa%$ WWWkéWK $Wa4~é$ ...a.,. No. 1049/2002. Counsel for the petiti are taking coercive steps £¢ : land o£ the petitioner, Cou as intervener, on the other being constructed in public petitioner has already file is submitted that since the before the court the case f 04.10o2002. Petitioner by Shri Ash State by Shri Sanjay K General . ahri Rajeev ShrivaStav Heard . Also hear& on M.(W.)P. Dner’submits that the resoondents )r construction of road upon the nsel for the reapondents as well hand, submitted that the road is I interest and further that the i the suit. which i3 pending. It matter is pending adjudication Articles 226/227 of the Con 3r exercise of jurisdiction under Having cons idered the ecord especially in View o£ the ndency of matter in the opinion of this Court, no case is made jurisdiction by this Court Constitution of I ndia . the material available on r facts and circumstances of the case, order of’iltrial Court and pe out for invoking extraordinary inder Articles 226/227 of the ish Shrivastava, Advocate. . Agrawal, Deputy Advocate Jr.” a, Advocate for intervener. stitution is not made out. GH’RT FS/350—12/2000 50,000, es %?m&g%€&&$ Wm? -F However, the trial cou :t is directed to expedite the hearing o£ the. case? ;The matter shall be in accordance with. law expeiitiously. the petition is di‘segosed ofo with this observ ation In view cf' the above order M.(W.)P. No. 1049/2002 for interim relief stands disposed of. Certified copy as per Rules. o the trial Court. ””’/’f ed1- Thak‘ heard and decided f? A copy of this order be also sent t ... m 29$ aide? were: (We) emWnmaia’wW eeeumer Fakhruddin