1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.282 OF 2006 IN APPEAL (L) NO.65 OF 2006 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.307 OF 2004 Maganlal Dalichand Jain and others. .. Appellants v/s. Narpatraj Besarmal Mehta and others. .. Respondents Mr.Tejas Vora i/by Mr.Bharat Joshi for the appellant-applicant. CORAM : R.M. LODHA & ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. DATED : 16TH FEBRUARY, 2006. P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant-applicant. Nobody appears for the respondents to oppose the notice of motion. 2. Having considered the affidavit in support of the notice of motion, we are satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause in filing the appeal in time. Delay in filing the appeal is condoned. 3. Office is directed to process the appeal and post it for admission as soon as numbered. Notice of motion stands disposed of. (R.M.LODHA, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)