IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** C.M. No.2488 of 2011 in/and C.W.P. No.8250 of 2006 Date of Decision:14.10.2011 Bhai Gurdev Singh .....Petitioner Vs. Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee .....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Ms. Vanita Sapra Kataria, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Virk, Advocate for the respondent. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in case the petitioner is reinstated in service with the same terms and conditions as applicable to Baljinder Singh, who filed C.W.P. No.7391 of 2006, he would be satisfied whereas learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the petitioner has been reinstated with the same terms and conditions as were applicable in the case of Baljinder Singh and copy of the order was sent but could not be delivered. In response to this, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to join his duties on Monday itself. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the present petition has become infructuous as the petitioner has been ordered to be reinstated at par with Baljinder Singh. Disposed of accordingly. October 14, 2011 ( DAYA CHAUDHARY ) renu JUDGE