WP(C) 6701/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Mr A Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr BJ Ghosh , learned State counsel. In challenge is the order dated 13.10.2010 passed by the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests and Head of Forest Force, Govt. of Assam transferring, i nter alia, the petitioner on promotion from Jorhat Division to Dibrugarh Divisio n to officiate as Accountant. Prior to the order of transfer the petitioner had been serving as Senior Assistant (Divisional Level). Being aggrieved by her tran sfer, the petitioner meanwhile has submitted a representation on 15.11.2010 befo re the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests and Head of Forest Force through p roper channel seeking interference therewith pleading, amongst others, that she was prepared to forgo her promotion if necessary. The representation, as the pet itioner as asserted, has remained undisposed as on date. Meanwhile, she has foll owed up the earlier representation by another dated 2.12.2010 which as well has remained unattended. Mr Choudhury on instructions submits that the petitioner is prepared to forgo her promotion if the same is a relevant consideration for her retention at Jorhat Division. Mr Ghosh, learned State counsel submits that in view of the s tand of the petitioner it may be in fitness of things that her representations be required to be disposed of on due consideration of the grounds as set forth t herein. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on a consideration of the pleaded facts and the documents appended to the writ petition, this Court is inclined, in view of the stand taken by the petitioner vis-à-vis her promoti on, that the respondent authorities ought to consider her representations on mer it and pass appropriate orders with due regard to the grounds as narrated therei n. For obvious reasons, this Court at this stage refrains from making any commen t on the grounds and it is left to the discretion and dominion of the concerned official respondents to take an appropriate decision. Needless to say, while disposing of the representations the aforemention ed respondent authority would keep in mind the consequence which the petitioner is prepared to suffer in pursuing her relief to continue at Jorhat Division. As the first representation of the petitioner is pending for over a mont h, the decision as required would be taken within a week from the date of receip t of a certified copy of this order. No costs.