IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition PIL No. 11 of 2010 Rajendra Singh Sagoi. .……… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others. .………. Respondents. Mr. M.S. Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.C. Bisht, Brief Holder for the respondents. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. KHEHAR, C. J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondents states, that the impugned order dated 07.11.2009 has been cancelled and the school, in respect of which a grievance has been raised by the petitioner, has been restored. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondents, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C. J.) 21.04.2010 21.04.2010 G