IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.8077 OF PETITION NO.8077 OF PETITION NO.8077 OF 2005 . 2005 . 2005 . Prakash D..Karande .. Petitioner. V/s. Mah.State Road Transport Corpration. ... Respondents. Shri N.A.Kulkarni for the petitioner. Shri G.S.Hegde for the respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. : V.C.DAGA, J. : V.C.DAGA, J. DATE: DATE: DATE: 20.12.2005. 20.12.2005. 20.12.2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : ---- ---- ---- . Heard rval parties. . During the course of hearing, Shri Hegde, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent, after taking instructions from Shri A.V. Patil, Legal Adviser, who is present in Court, makes a statement that in the event of imposition of any punishment, the same shall not be given effect for a period of one week. While reacting to this, learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that in that event, he may be permitted to withdraw the substantive complaint filed before the Labour Court, Pune, bearing Complaint (ULP) No. 24/2005, with liberty to challenge the said action, if so advised. Shri Hegde has no objection in permitting the petitioner to withdraw the complaint . 2. In the above view of the matter, petitioner is allowed to withdraw the complaint. Complaint is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner as indicated above. Needless to mention that with the withdrawal of the substantive complaint itself, all orders passed from time to time shall not survive. All rival contentions are kept open. . Petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs.