IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15522 of 2009 JAMIL AHMAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 20.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This petition for bail has been filed by the petitioner, who is an accused for offences punishable under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from the F.I.R. itself it is quite apparent that the informant had not recognized the petitioner rather at the instance of the someone else the petitioner was caught but neither the mobile concerned nor any other articles has been recovered from his possession. He further states that he has made no confessional statement and has been falsely implicated in the instant case. Learned counsel for the petitioner also avers that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since October, 2008. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, this petition is allowed. Let petitioner, namely, Jamil Ahmad be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Rail Judicial Magistrate, Barauni (Bachhawara) in connection with Barauni (Bachhawara) Rail P.S. Case No. 112 of 2008. S.Sb/- (S.N. Hussain, J.)