IBSWTS Kaialeshwar Tiwari (wToagly iiientioned as Kameshwai' Tiwari ia the impiigned order } Son of Late Shii Chandrika Tiwari, aged about 59 years, Workini as Railge Assistaat (Forester) Forest Range Baskepi, Circle Chando, District Surguja (C.G.) State of Chhatnsgarh, Through: The Secretaiy,. Departnient ofForest, D.K.S. Bliawan, Raipur(C.G,^ The Under Secretaiy, State of Chhattisgarli, Departinent of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawaii, Raipiu-(C.G.) The Priiicipal' Chief Conservator of Forest, Raipiir (C.G.) The ConseiT'ator of Forest, Surguja Forest Circle Ambikapur, District The Divisional Surguja Division, Suj~guja(C.G.) Arabikapur, District Shn V.K. Paiidey, counsel for the pei Shri Arviad Dubey, Panel Lawyer for copy. icr. State ofadvan< Heard on adxnissioii. The cliaUenge is inade to fhe transfer order dated 7.7.2007 by which, fhe petitioner, who is working as a Raage Assistant (Forester), has been transferred from. Baskepi Circle Chando, Forest Division Surguja to Bastar Forest Div~ision. Leamed counsel for fhe petitioner argiies tfaat tlie petitioner is going to retire on 31.7.2008, fherefore, he shoiild not have been transferred froni the said place and protection should have been given to hiia ia. tei-ms of tramsfer y' W,P,(S) No. 4334/2007 poUcy dated 13th June, 2007 (Aiinexiire-P/45. He subinits that if exactly calculated froia fhe date of issiiance of transfer order, fhe period of superanauation coines few days, later tlian one year, tliereforc, in the strict sense, fhe benefit ofthat clause inay not be extended to ftie petitioner but on huinanitai-ian grounds, tlie case ofthe petitioner laay be considered by fhe departinent. He subinits fhat the petitfoner has made a Tepresentation dated 16.7.2007 to fhe conceraed authorit}r biit fhe concemed aufhority has not disposed of the representation so far. He also subiaits that tliis petition niay be disposed ofwith a directioa to fhe concemed authori^y to dispose of the said lepresentation witlua fhe stipulated period granted by this Court and tffl tfaen, the petitioaer luay be atlowed to contuiue on fhe present place of vatti The prayer jaade by leamed counse.} for th.e petitioner is principatiy opposed by leanied coirase} for the State. Haviag heard tlie learaed couasel for tlie pai'ties, having considered fhe facts and circuxnstances of fhe case, particularly coasideiing that flie petitioner is going to retire oa 31,7.2008, I aia of fhe considered opinion that flie ends of justice would be seived, if fhe petitioncr is given a direction to ffle .a represeatation aud the concemed authority is directed to dispose of fhe saine v/ithin fhe stipulated period grauted by this Court. It is directed that let the petitioaer file a detailed representation before the concemed aiifhorit}r aloEginfii the copy of fliis order said copy of fhe writ petition wifhia a period of 15 days from. toda}r said if such a representatioa is filed, tfae concemed authority shall dispose of tlie saine as early as possible preferably wifhia a period of 60 days fx-oia the date of receipt of such represeatation. It is further directed fhat fhe transfer order shaU be lcept m abeyance aad the petitioner shall be aUowed to contmiie on his pi-esent place ofpostmg. Witli !fhe aforesaid directions, the petition stands fijially disposed of. -.-,..—.—&—~ Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge