^^ /r^: "\ / .—':^ ik... ^l ^'' ^ <vu HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BiLASPUR DIVISION BENCH Coram APPELLANT NON-APPLSCANT N0.3 HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. IVI.C.C.No.82of2007 National Insurance Company Limited G.E. Road, Near Old Bus Stand, Raipur, Through : Its Acting Divistonal Manager, Bilaspur Office, Taha Complex, Vyapar Vihar Road, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh Versus RESPONDENT N0.1 1. APPLICANT RESPONDENT N0.2 2. NON-APPLiCANT N0.1 RESPONDENT N0.3 3. NON-APPUCANT N0.2 Raju Sahu, aged about 38 years, S/o. Shri Daulal Sahu, R/o. Near Satbahanta Temple, Jorapara, Raipur (CG) L. Krishna Reddy, aged about 38 years, S/o. Shri Veera Reddy, R/o. Malkapet, P.S. Matkapet, District Hyderabad (Andhra Pradesh) (Driver df Truck No. AP 28 T/7261) Smt. Rama Rectdy, C/o. V. Rajendra Reddy, R/o. Plot No.38, Highway Colony, Chintalkiitta, Saror Nagar (Andhra Pradesh) (Registered owner of Truck No. AP 28 T/7261) APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF MISC. APPEAL PR No. 3083/2008 Present: Shri N.K. Agrawal, learned Senior Counsel with Shri Suryakant Mishra, learned counsel for the petitjoner. Shri Harsh Mahant, learned counsel for respondent No.1. None for respondents No. 2 and 3. ORDER (22nd October, 2008) ^;.;:^..,. ^i'^^J?" The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J.: Learned counsel for the parties are heard on M.C.P. No.362/2007, a petition for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 2. On due consideration of the submissjons of the leamed counsel for the parties, we are satisfled that the petitioner/lnsurance Company has succeeded in showing sufficient cause for the delay in filing the restoration petition. 3. M.C.P. No.362/2007, therefore, is allowed and the delay in filing the restoration petition is hereby condoned. 4. Learned counse! for the parties are heard on the restoration petition. 5. The petitioner/lnsurance Company is seeking restoration of M.A. No. 553/2006, which came to be dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated 13.11 .2006. 6. On due consideration, M.C.C. No.82/2007 is allowed and M.A. No.553/2006 is restored to its original number. -^—-— Sd/- aiiefJustice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge padma