r»J INTHE HIGHCOURTOF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR WRIT PETITION fSI N0. ^z^s" / 2006 PETITIONER: Y>,.-' c5; ^y1 6'°"x...••"'" y" .•**"'' ,,,-^(?" 41 Years, ^^^ ^.'"'" ^<0^:y"/-""" Bhavar1' ] ^l.--"' ^^ ^ Suraj Kumar Dewangan, S/o Shri K.L.Dewangan, Aged about Post- Teacher, R/o Ashirvad Infront of kumharpara School, Karbala Road, Juna Bilaspur, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS; ^l. State of Chhattisgarh ^ v / " •l^d'- /o4 .-. .s^£ ^^ t c^v / Through the Secrgtary, School Education Oepartment Ministry, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur, (C.G.) 2. The District Education Officer Bilaspur, District Bilaspur,(C.G.) 3. The Principal, Shri Gurunanak Higher Secondary School , Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUENCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBTION. CERTIORARI. AND ANY OTHER WRITS. DIRECTIONS OR ORDERS. The petitioner named above begs to submit as under: - XI-HC-78 sn^TqiTfeN; dqr 3TK?T sRTW Y^ HIH^II Sh*1ICh 3^'"i<l<<ld<l, si-rfly'is, Rldiyy m^ .W?.^fl..^.^-^ 200 ^ 3(1^?T wch (yi(^cti^T) ^iiwnf^rsn^T 14-8-2006;- Mr. Alok Dewangan, counsel Mr. Sotish 6upta, Deputy Bf advance copy. Heapd both the counsel. The case of the petitionet) since 27-8-1987 and as per the State of M.P. the Assistant Teacl examination on their owri expense^ increments. The petitioner posse^ year 1993 and a certificate to th4t has not been given the benefit w| granted two advonce increments Courtvide Annexure-P/4. Having heard leorned couns^ and cireumstances of the case, wi| the case, the petitioner is aibwed copy of this petition raising a!l period of 15 dcys from today a( examine the case of the petitio^ier petitioner in this petition and in reaches to the conclusion that siml benefit of two advance increment4 ':'---^ *l<lfifl<)1-l WRff ff fS^S <Rl«;K ^isrf^Tsn^r for the petitioner. 'ovt. Advocate for- the State/respondents, on is thot he is wor-king as Assistant Teacher Instructions dated 24-12-98 issued by the ^iers vuho have passed B.T.I., B.Ed. and AA.Ed. after 22-10-64 are entitled for two advance his B.Ed. exsmination on his own cost in the effect is Annexure-P/1, but the petitioner nereas, similarly situated persons have been under the order-s of the Tribunal and this * ^l for- the parties, having regard to the focts thout expressing any opinion on the merit of to make a detoiled representation along with his grievances to respondent No.2 within a pd in turn, respondent No.2 is dir-ected to in the tight of averments made by the ihe representation also. If respondent No.2 ilarly situated persons have been granted the ; and the petitioner's case is also covered for P.T.O. i* XI-HC-78 3:n^T^irR-) traTS)l^iilsht|i+ Barve ^ ^" f»> A> 3^'-^raT?pr, »Tf)'M'i6,Rrtiyy *11+<MI S(WT^ ^ 200 W^t\ tia<ti (l,clt3's««ET) ^ITWCTl^cTSn^T -cX. grant of two adyance incremenl pass orders within a period of 3 With the direction afore: Parties are entitled for c qiiitfi'fl-i 1111-iT ^ fscS <R]^K ^srf^iTsn^r •s on the basis of Sovernment's order, then to months from today, in accor'donce with law. said, the petition stands disposed of. sr'tified copy of this order. Sd/- L.< P.T.O. /