MP 1 WP7765_09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7765 OF 2009 Smt. Rakhamabai Ramchandra Takale and another... Petitioners Versus Balu Jaising Yadav and others ... Respondents Mr. Umesh R. Mankapure for Petitioners. Mr. Vishwanath Talkute for Respondent No. 2. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. THURSDAY, APRIL 21, 2011 P. C. : Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard by consent. 2. Inspite of being duly served with notice for final disposal, none appears for respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4. 3. The petition challenges the order dated 22nd July 2009 vide which the review application filed by the respondent No. 1 was allowed. By the impugned Order, the learned Principal District Judge, Satara has directed M.A.C.P. No. 393 / 1988 to be reopened only against the present respondent No. 1. 4. I find that it would be in the interests of justice that instead of reopening the M.A.C.P. No. 393 / 1988, the entire claim petition is restored to the file of the learned Tribunal, and that the learned Tribunal decides the same in accordance with law after hearing all the concerned parties. MP 2 WP7765_09 5. Rule made absolute in the aforesaid terms with no order as to costs. 6. In the facts and circumstances, the learned Tribunal is directed to decide the claim petition on merits within a period of six months from the date of the receipt of the order. (B.R. GAVAI, J)