WW,WWW ¢ M 200 3mm 0mm) WWW,W bhn gume'sh State} résp011dcuts. Ham‘d. 0210112008 Shn A2111 $mgh Ra1put C unsel for the pcutmner BaJaj Govt Advocate for the T116 patitianar by this pe ition has imyugned the order dated 11th December 2007 yassed by Upper C(Jllector, Durg, respondent No.2 herem, in Pallchayat Ca e No.1ljA—89 whereby her petition under Section 2 1(4) of the Chh ttisgarh Panchavat Raj Adhjm'yam, Fs/59~ 3mm ._3o,m.-u m m Hi 200 mm (W) WWW WWW Wmmgsétm Z % aimm 11. Hceraxlan, Sic; Shiv Lal, aged about 35 y€ars r 12. \ Narayzm Singh, Sjc; Kripa Ram, aged abaut 29a years 13. Hari Ram: 8/0 Budh Ram, aged about 30 yuata 14. Gavab ti. WI a Rai Kumal‘ 15. 16. 17. 18. Respt) 1dents 5 to 18 are Panchas Rjo 476 WW,W,W was dismissed declaring the No 1993 {for hravity ‘Act of 1993’) Conjldence Motion taken up bV the Gram Panohayat, Anwari to be passed in accordanca with law. Laarned counsel for the meeting h€1d for cansideratim: petitionsr was not afforded an r and straighmray tho motion was. that the karks made by the } favour of thc Motion was not ck Sectiml 2 1(4) of the Act of 1993 Z of by the Upper Collector where Act of 1993 clearlv mentions th the Collector who alone 1S compe imnugned orders it is manifestly anbrded sufncient opportunity of onndence Motion was put to vote. The presiding ofiicer, respondent No. 4 herein, has mentioned this Ier, the Tribunal after considering t4 were present in the meeting and Edence Motion and onlv one Panch .eclared the No Confidence Motion law. After going through the clear that the petitioner was Stating his case befm‘e the NO C fact in the proceedings. Moreo the fact that out of 18 PanchaS 13 voted in favour of the No Con] voted agajnStJzhe Motion, has c to be oassed in acc ordance with petitioner submits that in the of No Conhdence Motion, the pportunity of presenting her case put to vote. It is further argued ’anchas present in the meeting in tar and thirdly, the petition under 1:13 been entertained and disposed 1s Sub—section 4 of Section 2 1 the at the dispute is to be referred to tent to decide the reference. tint-m tow gamma, maria FS/59— 8mm iaoniu. ‘FFL 200 an?“ W (W) m anW m afar am 3 W111? Inwh‘ 1? fag? W. ‘ a: aimm WW, m, Wm a 200 3mm (W) mmm WWW§1®€IWR §3Wa1€m Collector was dulv authorized reference and no objectian was Upper Collector in this regard, entertained bv this Court. being devoid of Substance is liable 111 the reeult. the petition to be dismissed at the admission stage'itself diemiss ed. $0 far .as the other ai‘gument that the Upper Collector was not comoetent to decide the reference is concerned, the Upper bv the Collector t0 consider the raieed by the petitioner before the therefore. this obiection caimot be