IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50837 of 2008 ARBIND KUMAR PATEL … … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … … Opp. Party For the petitioner: Shri Shakeel Ahmad Khan,Sr.Adv. For the State: Shri Dashrath Mehta,APP ----------- 2. 15.12.2008 Heard. I do not see any reason to reconsider the earlier rejection order. The reasons are duly assigned therein. The petition is dismissed. However, on a reading of the order dated 18.11.2008 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtas, it is pointed out that the complainant is not producing all the witnesses and delaying the trial. I could direct the trial court which is in seisin of the matter, to act under Section 309 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the complainant so as to discouraging him from taking dilatory tactics. If still the complainant does not produce the witnesses or does not produce the document before the court then the court could have no option but to close the 2 evidence so as to disposing of the case as the petitioner is in custody since 14.3.3008. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)