IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DECEMBER 2010 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 14377 of 2010(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- RAJAN M.N., CLERK/CASHIER, M/S.KERALA STATE HOMOEOPATHIC CO-OPERATIVE PHARMACY LTD., (HOMCO), NO.T-432, PATHIRAPPALLY P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN-688 521. BY ADVS. SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.S.SUJIN SMT.NITA.N.S. RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE HOMOEOPATHIC CO-OPERATIVE PHARMACY LTD. NO.T-432, PATHIRAPPALLY P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN 688 521. 2. THE KERALA STATE HOMOEOPATHIC CO-OPERATIVE PHARMACY LTD., NO.T-432, PATHIRAPPALLY P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN 688 521 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT.RANI DIOTHIMA P. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 14377 of 2010(V) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX ---------------- PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ------------------------------------ EXT.P1. COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 5.11.2004 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONENT. EXT.P2. COPY OF APPOINTMENT ORDER OF ONE MR.MATHEW JOSEPH DATED 21.11.1981 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT. EXT.P3. COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER ON 22.04.2010 BEFORE THE RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL --------------------------------------- / TRUE COPY / P.A. TO JUDGE VK P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. W.P.(C) No. 14377 OF 2010 ......................................................................... Dated this the 1st December , 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner, who is working as a clerk-cum-cashier in the second respondent/Pharmacy, is stated as aggrieved of his stagnation in the post held by him without being given any promotion while several other persons have already been promoted by passing appropriate orders by the first respondent at different points of time. The learned Counsel submits that the grievance of the petitioner has already been projected by filing Ext. P3 representation, which is stated as pending before the first respondent. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court does not propose to go into the merits of the case. The first respondent is directed to consider Ext. P3 representation preferred by the petitioner, in accordance with law and pass final W.P.(C) No. 14377 OF 2010 2 orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment . The Writ Petition is disposed of. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk