IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.961 of 2005 Between: Baniqula Eswara Rao, S/o.Late Konda R/o.Rolugunta Village and Mandal Visakhapatnam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Sub Divisional Magistrate (Exercising powers under Criminal Procedure Code, 1973) Paderu, Visakhapatnam District. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer Rolugunta Mandal, Rolugunta Village and Mandal Visakhapatnam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the notice in Rc.No.3346/04.C Dt.20.12.2004 issued by the 1st respondent herein is arbitrary, illegal and one without jurisdiction and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.SOMASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.961 of 2005 ORDER: When the matter has been taken up for hearing on 01-05-2008, none appeared for the petitioner and as such, the matter was directed to be posted after summer vacation. Again on 12-06-2008, when the matter has been taken up for hearing, none appeared for the petitioner and therefore, the matter was directed to be posted after three weeks. Today, though the matter is posted under the caption “final hearing”, neither learned counsel for the petitioner is present nor is there any representation on his behalf. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, the interim order granted on 08-02-2005 stands vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 03-07-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{MPL}