IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.1955 of 2009 Date of decision: February 6, 2009 Balwant Singh ... Petitioner Versus Haryana State Agriculture Marketing Board & others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. Ravinder Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J.(Oral) In this writ petition, the petitioner has claimed appointment to the post of Accountant with effect from the date respondent No.3 was appointed as such. It is not disputed that both the petitioner and respondent No.3 had filed separate writ petition for claiming this relief. In the litigation initiated by the petitioner he was directed to be appointed as Mandi Supervisor to which the petitioner was so appointed. However, in the writ petition filed by respondent No.3 a direction was issued to appoint him as Accountant. In the circumstances, the claim of the petitioner is totally untenable. He got a particular relief from the Court and took the benefit thereof. He cannot now claim another relief which has been granted to another person and claim parity. CWP No.1955 of 2009 -2- Consequently, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. February 06, 2009 ( AJAY TEWARI ) sonia JUDGE