IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD SATURDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH SECOND APPEAL No.1394 of 2010 Between: Paturi Veera Venkata Narasimha Rao ..... APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF AND Paturi Geeta and 4 others .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH SECOND APPEAL No.1394 of 2010 JUDGMENT: Appellant is the plaintiff who filed the suit O.S.425/1991 on the file of the II Addl.Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam for specific performance of Ex.A1 agreement of sale dated 23.04.1991 and to set aside Ex.A6 registered sale deed dated 02.11.1991. It is stated that during pendency of the suit, the original defendant died and his legal representatives and subsequent agreement holders of Ex.B1 agreement dated 22.03.1991 which was subsequently sold under Ex.A6 sale deed were impleaded. The trial Judge held that the tenor of drafting the contents of Ex.A1, when perused referring to the signature of the 1st defendant and the rubber stamp of the 1st defendant, it creates very strong suspicious circumstances as to the correctness of the contents of Ex.A1. However, the plaintiff was not ready and willing to perform his part of contract in all material time and therefore, the suit was dismissed. As against the same, the appeal was filed and the lower appellate Court also confirmed the findings of the trial Judge holding that Ex.A1 is not genuine and bind to the defendant. In view of the concurrent findings of both the Courts below, I do not see any question of law, much less substantial questions of law that arises for consideration in this second appeal. The Second Appeal is accordingly dismissed at the stage of admission. No order as to costs. ___________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 29.01.2011 Dsr