IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR [C.G.1 WRIT PETITION (S) N0. \^V\ /2010 PETITIONER ^v^ <y /" .^...•^' /vX^-^^.- ^SP' '^>f" ^ \ RESPONDENTS Harishankar Chandra S/o Sri Buda Gountiya Chandra, Aged-about 58 years, Working as Upper Division teacher, Goverrunent Priinary school, Kansa, Block- Dhanbhara, Distt.- Janjgu-- Champa [C.G.] VERSUS l.State of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, School education department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur [C.G.] 2. Director, Lok Shiskan sanchanalaya, Raipur [C.G.] 3. District Education Officer, Distt- Jaajgir-Champa [C.G.] 4. Block Education officer, Block- Dhabhara, Distt- Janjgu- Champa [C.G.] WRIT PETmQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT. ORDER OR DIRECTIONS The above named petitioners inost humbly and respectfully begs to submit as under: l.PARTICULARS OF THE-PETITIONER- As mentioned above. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS- As meritioned above. fp^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.1271 OF 2010 PETITIONER Harishankar Chandra ^ RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others Gov/ri (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri D.R. Patel, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyerforthe State. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 23rd day ofApril, 2010) Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 1) Learned counset appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made a representation to the District Education Officer, Janjgir-Champa, for correction of his date of birth in the service record by Annexure - P/4, but ti!l date no action has been taken. 2) Annexure - P/4 does not indicateany date. However, if there is any discrepancy in the date of birth of the petitioner, firstly the petitioner has to make a representation before the appropriate authority and after decision taken on the said representation by the authority the petitioner still remains unsatisfied, he may approach the Court. At this stage, when the application is pending consideration, no writ can be issued. 3) Accordingly, the writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed at the motion stage itself. However, it is expected that the District Education Officer, Janjgir-Champa, shall look into the grievance of the petitioner and take appropriate decision, in accordance with law and on its own merits. __^—— Sd/- SatishK-Agnihotri Judge