^r; .lUDLCATUREATCHHATOSQARHiBfl.ASPUR !,J. PETITSON 1373S&06 4. Sunil Kumar Yadav, S/o Shri Chhedilal Yadav, Aged 32 years. Occupation -P.C.O. Shop Resident of: Railway Bugtoa para RAIGARH District - Raigarh (CG) Deepak Jaiswal, S/o Shri iuiewalal Jaisvval, Aged about 30 years Occupation-Photocopy Shop, Resident of: Behind Ans Hotel, Dheemrapur Chov'/k, RAIGARH District-Raigarh(C.G.) Anima Vibha Kujur, W/o Shri Deepak Jaiswal, Aged about 28 years. Resident of: Behind Ans Hotel, Dheemrapur Chowk, RAIGARH District-Raigarh(C.G.) Dwarka Prasad Aarawal S/o Shri l-1etram Agrawal, Aged about 67 years Resident of: Baikunthpur • RAIGARH District: Raigarh (C.G.) 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Home Secretar^, D.K.S. Bhawan, RAIPUR(C.G.) 2. The Superintendent of Police, RAIGARH (CG) 3. The Station House Officer, City Kotv/ali, Police Station, RA!GARH(C.G.) 4. Smt. Rani Devi Lala, Widow of Late Horiial Lala. aged about 60 years; resident of Tendudipa, Behind Railway West Cabin, Raigarh (C.G.) 5. Sudesh Kumar Lala, Son of Late Shri Horiial Laia; aged about 40 years, resident ofTendudipa, Behind RailwayWest Cabin, Raigarh (C.G.) 6. Smt. Chandra Kanta Wife of Shri Sudesh Kumar Lala, aged about 38 years, resident of Tendudipa, Behind RailwayWest Cabin, Raigarh (C.G.) 7. Dr. Virencfra H. Singh, Son of not known, occupation - Lecturer in College, resident of Gwalipura, Naya Sahar, Post Bandera, District Amravatj (M.S.) Present Shri A.P. Sharma, Counsel forths petitioners. Shri Pramod KumarVerma, Additional Advocate General for the State/respondent nos. 1 to 3. Smt. Meena Shastri, Counsel for respondent nos. 4 to /'. . (Passed on 21 stAprji 2CCS) The following oral order of the Court was passed by On the last date hearing i.e. on 4/4/2006, Ku. Anita Lafa was produced before this Court and this Court had interacted with Ku. Anita Lala, her mother - Smt. Rani Devi Lala and her brother - Sudesh Kumar Laia. After hearing all of them, we were satisfied that Ku. Anita Lala was not either confined or detained by the respondent nos. 4 to 7 against her vi/ill. In that view ofthe matter, there is no need to take any further steps in this Writ Petition and it is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- Chief Justice Sdf- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge