1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 7810 of 2010 Date of Decision: 14.7.2011 *** Harbinder Singh .. Petitioner VS. Jaswinder Singh & Ors. .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR, Present:- Mr. G.S. Punia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. D.N. Ganeriwala, Advocate for respondents. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. The present petitioner-plaintiff, after having remained unsuccessful in getting temporary injunction during the pendency of the suit, before the Courts below, has preferred the instant revision petition. Heard. It emerges out from the records that the plaintiff filed a suit seeking specific performance of the agreement to sell dated 22.6.2001, the execution of which has been denied by the contesting respondents. Both the Courts below have taken the aforesaid agreement with suspicion, prima facie. Before this Court, learned counsel for the petitioner has pressed his prayer qua grant of injunction pendente-lite qua alienation of the suit property. Both the Courts below observed that the alienation, if any, made during the pendency of the suit, will certainly hit by lis-pendense and thus, refused to grant any injunction. It is no doubt true that transferee is bound by the decree in respect of transfer made in his favour during pendency of the suit, but in the considered opinion of this Court, to avoid multiplicity of 2 litigation and any further intricacy in the matter, it would be in the interest of justice if the respondents are restrained from alienating the suit land in favour of anybody else, during the pendency of the suit. In this view of the matter, the instant revision is partly allowed, thereby modifying the orders passed by the Court below, restraining the contesting respondents from alienating the suit property in favour of anybody, during the pendency of the suit. (ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE July 14,2011 Jiten