..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1166 OF 2008 Shri Baljit Singh Gandhi s/o Dhanwant Singh Gandhi. ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. .... Mr.Aabad H.H.Ponda, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.H.J.Dedia, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 28th July, 2008. DATED : 28th July, 2008. DATED : 28th July, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in C.R.No.73 of 2008 of Byculla police station. The said case is under Sections 285, 336, 337, 338, 304 of IPC. 3. The prosecution case is that many aerosol can and other products were kept in the premises of the applicant. Work of sealing the cans was taking place in the premises. There was leakage of gas. Due to this, there was huge explosion in ..(2).. the premises. Ten persons died and fifty-eight persons were injured in the incident. In the year 1997 there was an incident in the premises of the applicant wherein a worker died due to inhaling of poisonous gas. 4. The present matter is of serious nature which requires investigation. Looking to the above facts, I do not think that this is a fit case to grant anticipatory bail. Application for anticipatory bail is rejected. 5. On request of the learned Counsel for the applicant, applicant is granted time to surrender upto 4th August, 2008. 6. The lower Court shall not be influenced by any of the observations made in this order while deciding the application for regular bail or while deciding the trial. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)