IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-27934 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:-29.10.2010 Kamljit Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present:- Mr.Dhanpat Rai Singla, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Shilesh Gupta, D.A.G. Punjab. M ehinder S ingh S ullar , J . (Oral) At the very outset, the learned State counsel has submitted that the offences under sections 395, 365 and 506 IPC and sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act cannot be compounded, in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in case Manoj Sharma V. State & others 2008 (4) RCR (Criminal) 827. 2. Faced with the situation, the learned counsel intends to withdraw the present petition to enable the petitioners to place on record the compromise before the trial Court. 3. In this view of the matter, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 4. Needless to say that the petitioners would be at liberty to bring on record the compromise and the concerned Court, of course, would be well advised to take the same into deep consideration as mitigating circumstances and to pass an appropriate order, in this relevant connection, in accordance with law. 29.10.2010 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) AS Judge