IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CM Nos. 16683-84-CII of 2012 in/and CR No. 2341 of 2003 Date of decision:- 16.07.2012 Ashok Kumar ....Applicant-Petitioner Vs. Aman Kumar and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL ****** Present: Mr. Aman Vashisth, Advocate, for Mr. Salil Bali, Advocate, for the applicant-petitioner. A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) The present revision petition was dismissed for want of prosecution on 15.07.2009 and the application for restoration of the same was filed on 05.03.2012. However, the delay has not been properly explained. Even otherwise, while examining the legality of the order passed by the trial Court on the application for amendment of the written statement, it transpires that the suit was instituted on 16.04.1993, the application was filed after a lapse of about seven years and the same was decided on 26.04.2003. Thereafter, the revision petition was filed which was dismissed on 15.07.2009, against which restoration application has been filed now. The impugned order does not suffer from any illegality, warranting interference by this Court. Dismissed. (A.N.JINDAL) July, 16, 2012 JUDGE ajp