THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.7748 OF 2010 ORDER: Heard Sri C.Ramachandra Raju, Learned Counsel for petitioner and Sri R.Ramachandra Reddy, Learned Standing Counsel for the respondent – Corporation and, at their request, the writ petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission. The notice issued under Section 636 of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 (GHMC Act) is under challenge in this writ petition. While Sri R.Ramachandra Reddy, Learned Standing Counsel for the GHMC would submit that the records would reveal the notice earlier having been issued under Sections 461 and 402 of the GHMC Act, it is necessary to note that the impugned notice under Section 636 makes no reference thereto. I consider it wholly inappropriate, therefore, to go into the question as to whether or not a notice was issued earlier. Leaving it open to the respondent – Corporation, if they so choose, to initiate proceedings under Section 636 of the GHMC Act afresh furnishing all details as to whether the said notice was preceded by notice under other provisions of the Act, the impugned notice is quashed on the ground that the said notice makes no reference to any prior notice being issued to the petitioner and as to whether or not she was given opportunity of being heard. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________ 15-4-2010 Note: Issue C.C. by 19.4.2010 B/o asp