THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.6213 of 2010 19.03.2010 Between: P.Devi Das ….Petitioner AND The District Collector, Adilabad District and others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.6213 OF 2010 ORDER: The petitioner is sarpanch of Bembar Village of Tannor Mandal in Adilabad District. He filed instant writ petition complaining about inaction of respondents 1 to 3 in conducting enquiry against fourth respondent as illegal and violative of Andhra Pradesh State Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2008. The petitioner states that the villagers gave a complaint on 13.08.2009 to third respondent about illegalities and irregularities committed by fourth respondent in distributing redgram to the cardholders. Be it noted that fourth respondent is a dealer of Fair Price Shop (FPS) of the village having 472 cards attached to the shop. It is further complained that Gram Panchayat also sent a complaint to third respondent on 21.08.2009 but no action has been taken. At the stage of admission itself, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies submits that on the complaint of villagers, the FPS dealership of fourth respondent was suspended by proceedings dated 22.01.2010. Aggrieved by the same, fourth respondent filed writ petition being W.P.No.1605 of 2010. This Court disposed of the same on 01.02.2010 directing second respondent herein to complete the enquiry within four weeks and also permitted fourth respondent to distribute essential commodities till then. A copy of the order passed by this Court in the said writ petition is annexed to writ petition by the petitioner himself. But he contends that in spite of the order of the Court, no further progress exists in the enquiry against fourth respondent. This is, however, denied by Assistant Government Pleader. After having perused the writ affidavit, and the earlier order of this Court as well as other material, this Court is convinced that the writ petition is filed in haste. Enquiry has already been initiated afresh. This Court observes that the same may be completed – if not already completed – as expeditiously as possible keeping in view the order of this Court in W.P.No.1605 of 2010. The counsel requests that the petitioner may be given opportunity to participate in the enquiry. The Control Order referred to hereinabove does not contemplate any such notice to cardholders or the complainants. Therefore, this Court cannot issue a direction, which would be contrary to Control Order. The writ petition, with the above observations, is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 19.03.2010 Pln