IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.1802 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:20.04.2011. Ramesh Kumar and others ...Petitioners Versus Ramesh Kumar ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. V.K.Sandhir, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 02.02.2011 by which evidence of the petitioners has been ordered to be closed. Learned counsel for the petitioners has produced zimni orders before this Court from which I have found that the petitioners have been regularly producing their witnesses for examination, but their cross- examination was deferred many a times on the request of counsel for the respondent and then the matter was kept on adjourning because of the talks of compromise between the parties. Hence, in view of the aforesaid fact, I do not agree with the impugned order whereby learned Rent Controller has observed that 18 opportunities have been granted to the petitioners but they have not led their evidence and as such, the impugned order is hereby set aside by allowing this revision petition in limine, though without any order as to costs. April 20, 2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain ) vinod* Judge