RFA No. 2615 of 1990 Present: Mr. P.S.Rana, Advocate for the appellants Mr.Rajeev Kawatra, Sr. DAG, Haryana -.- The appellants seek disposal of the present appeal in terms of the judgment dated 5.10.2007 passed by this Court in RFA No. 882 of 1983. In the aforesaid judgment, the following directions were issued:- “In absence of sufficient material of comparable rates, the market price can be determined by periodical increase formula approved by the Apex Court in the case of Sahaswan, District Badaun (supra). If the formula approved by the Apex Court in Sahaswan, District Badaun (supra) is to be applied with 1973 year as the base, the market value of the land in the year 1980 comes to Rs.58.45/- in the year 1981 comes to Rs.66.21 and in the year 1982 comes to Rs.76.21. The land being big chunk, 1/3 rd of the price has to be reduced as at least this much land is required for development purposes, for roads, parks and public utilities. Therefore, the rate per square yard comes to Rs.39.17 as on the date of notification dated 4.6.1980 and Rs.44.37 per square yard as on the date of notification dated 13.3.1981 and at Rs.51.07 per square yard as on the dates of notifications dated 22.6.1982 and 5.7.1982. Accordingly, the market price of the land under different acquisition notifications is assessed at Rs. 39 per square yard in respect to land acquired for Sector-6(represented by Notification dated 4.6.1980), Rs.44 for Sector 3 (represented by Notification dated 13.3.1981) and Rs.51 for Sectors 9 & 7 (represented by the notifications dated 22.6.1982 and 5.7.1982). These appeals are accordingly allowed with costs and respondents are directed to calculate the compensation for the acquired land at the above rates. The appellants are also entitled to solatium and interest as RFA No. 2615 of 1990 -2- determined by the Reference Court on the amount determined herein. A copy of this judgment by placed on record of all above said connected cases.” The acquisition in the present case is covered by the notification dated 5.7.1982 pertaining to Sector-7, Urban Estate, Karnal, which was also the subject matter of the aforesaid appeal. This appeal is, accordingly, disposed of in terms of the directions contained in the the aforesaid judgment 9.5.2008 (PERMOD KOHLI) mk JUDGE