IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.28369-M of 2009 Date of Decision:20.7.2010 Darshan Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Rishav Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Priyanka Dalal, A.A.G. Haryana. SI Narender Kumar in person with Mr. Naresh Kaushal, Advocate. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed for issuance of direction to the respondents to investigate the case and to take measures for the discovery and arrest of the accused/offender in FIR No.293 dated 26.6.2009 under Sections 379/411/452/467/471/120-B/420 IPC Police Station Sector- 5 Panchkula. In para 4 of the reply filed by SI Narender Kumar, P.S. Sector- 5, it is stated that the Superintendent of Police, Panchkula has already ordered re-investigation on 9.7.2010 by the D.S.P. Crime, Panchkula. In view of the above, no further action is called for. However, this Court has no doubt that the re-investigation ordered by the Superintendent of Police, Panchkula, shall be fair and impartial. Meanwhile, in pursuance to the order dated 21.5.2010 issuing notice to SI Narender Kumar, P.S. Sector-5, Panchkula, with respect to Crl. M. No.28369-M of 2009 -2- show cause as to why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against him, reply by way of affidavit of Narender Kumar, Sub Inspector, P.S. Sector 5, Panchkula has been filed tendering unconditional apology with a request that there was no intention to mislead the Court. The same is accepted. SI, Narender Kumar is discharged of the said notice. However, he is directed to be careful in future. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. 20.7.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE