bgp bgp bgp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3815 OF 2008 OF MOTION NO.3815 OF 2008 OF MOTION NO.3815 OF 2008 IN IN IN INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.3023 OF 2008 TAX APPEAL (L)NO.3023 OF 2008 TAX APPEAL (L)NO.3023 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs. M/s.Gitanjali Exports Corporation Ltd. ..Respondent WITH NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3816 OF 2008 OF MOTION NO.3816 OF 2008 OF MOTION NO.3816 OF 2008 IN IN IN INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.3022 OF 2008 TAX APPEAL (L)NO.3022 OF 2008 TAX APPEAL (L)NO.3022 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs. M/s.Gitanjali Gems Ltd. ..Respondent Mr.R.Asokan for the Appellant. Mr.S.J.Mehta for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, V.C.DAGA, V.C.DAGA, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 15TH DECEMBER, 2008 : 15TH DECEMBER, 2008 : 15TH DECEMBER, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Mr.Asokan, the learned Counsel for the Appellant undertakes to serve a copy of the Memo of Appeal along with its annexures to the learned Counsel for the Respondent, within a period of two weeks from today. 2. By these Notices of Motion, the Appellant is seeking the condonation of 19 days’ delay in filing the above Appeals. Perused the Notices of Motion and Affidavits-in-support thereof. Sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay. There is no case of inaction negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notices of Motion are made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)