IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 1ST APRIL 2008 / 12TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 11081 of 2008(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- JANASREE CANTEEN UNIT, KUDUMBASREE, KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESENT SECRETARY SHEEBA VELAYUDHAN, AGED 36 YEARS, W/O.VELAYUDHAN, VADAKKUMPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHITTANOOR, KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT SRI.RANJIT BABU RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL, KUNNAMKULAM, REPRESENTED BY THE SUPERINTENDENT, KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT, GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL, KUNNAMKULAM, KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 11081 OF 2008 T = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 1st April, 2008. J U D G M E N T The challenge in this writ petition is against Ext. P3 notice by which the petitioner who was running a canteen by Ext. P1 is asked to vacate the premises. Counsel contends that Ext. P1 did not provide for any period and therefore, there is no justification in issuing Ext. P3. 2. I am not in a position to accept this contention for the reason that Ext. P3 shows that the contract with the petitioner was terminated and orders dated 9.1.2008 and 5.2.2008 are referred to in Ext. P3 itself. These orders were not challenged by the petitioner. Now that the termination has become final, the respondents are entitled to require the petitioner to vacate from the premises entrusted for running the canteen in pursuance to Ext. P1, the contract that is already terminated. W.P.(C) No. 11081 OF 2008 -2- 3. However, I clarify that this judgment will not stand in the way of the petitioner approaching the respondents for reconsideration of the matter. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-