1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R D.B. Civil Writ Petition (Parole) No.7928 of 2009. Mohd. Salim son of Shri Sayad @ Shahjada VERSUS State of Rajasthan & Others Date of Order :::: 07/09/2009 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh Hon'ble Mr. Justice G.S. Sarraf Mr. Lakhan Singh Tomar, Counsel for the Petitioner. Mrs.Rekha Madnani, Deputy Government Counsel for State. Per Court :- Heard learned counsel for the parties. This petition has been preferred by the convict- prisoner for being released on parole. Earlier a petition No.906/2009 came to be filed before this Court and this Court directed the respondents vide its order dated 04.03.2009 to decide the application submitted by the petitioner in accordance with the law within a period of three months. Along with this petition, the document (Annexure-1), which is the order of the Advisory Committee 2 has been filed and according to which the petitioner has been declined the grant of parole on the ground that the petitioner had submitted that his mother had been unwell and he may be released on parole. As per the report (Annexure-1), there is no supporting document or report duly verified from the District Authority at Muradabad (Uttra Pradesh) verifying the aforesaid fact. In the facts and circumstances, therefore, the petitioner is at liberty to submit a fresh application with relevant document in support of the illness of his mother. Another ground, which has been taken by the respondents in their reply is that the conduct of the petitioner was found to be unsatisfactorily. No details of any such unsatisfactorily conduct has been specified either in the reply or in the order. In such an event the respondents must specify the exact nature of the unsatisfactorily conduct as to whether any punishment etc., in jail has been awarded or there is any other reason for treating the conduct of the prisoner as unsatisfactorily. In the facts and circumstances of the present case with liberty to the petitioner to submit the proper application to the jail authorities with supporting document, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction that in the 3 event of such an application being filed the application would be considered and decided on merits in accordance with the law within three months. This petition stands disposed of. (G.S. Sarraf) J. (Dalip Singh) J. ashok/