IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 1731 of 2008. Decided on: 02.11.2011. _______________________________________________ Shri Bablu and another. … Petitioners. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioners : Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Dev Raj Dev, Advocate for respondent No.3. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. Ramesh Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present lis is covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in Kushal Chand and another Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, CWP(T) No.1728 of 2008, decided on 12th July, 2010. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for regularisation strictly as per the principles laid down in the judgment cited hereinabove, within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioners. Needless to add that in the eventuality of the services of the petitioners being regularised, they will be entitled to all the consequential benefits. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. November 02, 2011. (sck).