^ c -f.1y BEFORETHE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.A.(C)No.\G^ /2008 APPELLANT DEFENDANT N0.3 .-.»•••:•;.,<""T: .^^.^ ^^^.{^ .^- :1. IFFCO- TOKIO GENERAI. INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, through the Branch Manager, Iffco- Tokio General Insurance Co.Ltd, . 3rd Floor 345-347, Lalganga Shopping Mal, G.E Road Raipur (CG) VERSUS t) •^ RESPONDENT N0.1 CLAIMANT N0. 1 RESPONDENTN0.2 CLAIMANT N0. 2 1., Smt. Lilavati Bai Widow of late Balla 2. alias Balram Sahu, Aged about 29 years. Dikesh S/o Late Balram Sahu, Aged about 12 years (Minor) RESPONDENT N0.3 CLAIMANTN0.3 Ku. Prabha, D/o Late Balram Sahu Aged about 10 years (Minor) RESPONDENT N0.4 CLAIMANT N0. 4 4^ Suraj , S/o Late Balram Sahu, Aged About6 yrs. (Minor) RESPONDENT N0.5 CLAIMANT N0. 5 5, Jhadiram ,Son of Late Ramadhin Sahu, Aged About55 yrs., , RESPONDENT N0.6 CLAIMANTN0.6 6. Yashodabai , Wife of Jhadiram Sahu, Aged About 50 yrs. Respondent no. 2 to 4 minor, represented through guardian mother Smt. Lilavati Bai Widow of late Balla alias Balram Sahu, All resident o) Village Bhatgaon, Police Station & Tehsil Mungeli, District - Bilaspur (C.G..), .^.•.•. ^...^.^..i^..^ RESPONDENT N0.7 DEFFENDENT N0.1 ^ RESPONDENT N0.8 DEFFENDENT N0.2 Santosh Kumar S/0 Adhanuram Aadile Aged About 32 yrs. Resident of Village -Lingiadih ,Police Station Sarkanda, Dist.-Bilaspur (C.G.), (Driver -Auto Delivery No.-C.G. 10- C/0705) Anukul Kumar S/0 R.K. Sinha Aged About 33 yrs , Resident of -E.W.S.-35 Nehru Nagar, Bilaspur (C.G.) (Owner- Auto Delivery No.-C.G. 10- C/0705) .I1 MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER SECTIQN 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, 1988 —78 3TT^T ^RT f<'-li4» ^f8TT <W^T sb^li<st) T ^^ »iw^fT^»*n^» 's^ ''^P^R, yTi1<l-(4i<o, [^<r)l^^< ...B.*A,C,e...W?.:...16°^ 200 W^ 1CT^F (^<i^<^T) y^mw^^Tsn^r D.B: HON'BLtWIR.JIUSriUE:! HON'BLE MR. JUSTICB 16.08.2011: None for the appellant. Shri Anumeh Shrivasta fa, counsel for the respondent No. 7. Even after the matter appeared for the appellant, have no other option but to| prosecution. Accordingly, the mis4 prosecution. Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge ch<^id41^ "wT^r ^f f^t Tf^r^R ^^tfiR W^T N.K. AGAKWAL & G. NINHAJUDDIN ^vas called in the second round, none jtherefore, in these circumstances, we dismiss the misc. appeaf for want of |. appeal is dismissed for want of I i Sd/- G. Minhajuddin Judge r