THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI Writ Petition No. 18021 of 2010 Dated: 26.07.2010 Between: Mohd. Abdul Aleem, Hyderabad. … Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by its Secretary, Hyderabad and 3 others. … Respondents THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 18021 of 2010 O R D E R: This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the notice dated 19.07.2010 issued by the 3rd respondent under Section 636 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 (for short ‘the Act’) calling upon the petitioner to remove the compound wall being constructed by the petitioner illegally in the open land opposite Masjid-e-Rahmania, Aghapura, Hyderabad is arbitrary and illegal. The material available on record shows that a show cause notice was issued on 14.07.2010 under Section 452 of the Act, alleging that the petitioner had un-authorizedly constructed a compound wall to the open land opposite Masjid-e-Rahmania, Aghapura, Hyderabad without obtaining any permission of the Corporation and calling upon the petitioner to show cause in writing as to why the said unauthorized compound wall should not be removed. The petitioner submitted an explanation on 17.07.2010. Having found that the said explanation was not satisfactory, the impugned notice was issued on 19.07.2010 under Section 636 of the Act directing the petitioner to remove the unauthorised construction. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents 2 and 3. According to the petitioner he is the joint owner of premises No.11-2-557/15, Shamsheer Bagh, Aghapura, and as the building therein was dilapidated, he got it demolished and raised a boundary wall around the plot to protect the same from encroachments. However, it was conceded that no specific permission was obtained by the petitioner before constructing the compound wall. Having regard to the admitted fact that no permission was obtained by the petitioner, the impugned action of the respondents in issuing the notice dated 19.07.2010 under Section 636 of the Act cannot be held to be arbitrary or illegal. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. ________________ G.ROHINI,J Date: 26.07.2010 KLP