IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 379 OF 2008 GOA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR ... Petitioner Versus STATE COMMISSIONER FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES STATE OF GOA AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Mahesh Sonak, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms. Sapna Mordekar, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 3. Mr. Valmiki Menezes, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Coram:- P. B. MAJMUDAR & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 5th February, 2009 P.C.:- By filing this petition, the Petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Commissioner, on the ground that the order is without jurisdiction. It is pointed out that during the pendency of this petition the post is identified and the Petitioner has started the process of filling the post expeditiously. Since the post is identified in consonance with the identification and with the roster, learned Counsel for the Petitioner has no objection if the impugned orders of the Additional Commissioner and Commissioner, are set aside. Considering the said aspect of the matter, in our view, the orders passed by the Additional Commissioner and the Commissioner are not required to be complied with regarding identification of the post by the Department. Considering the said aspect, both the said orders are set aside. The Department to act accordingly as per the statements made before this Court and fill up the post within a reasonable time. Petition disposed of accordingly. It is clarified that the issues raised in this petition are not adjudicated on merits in view of subsequent development and the petition is being disposed of as above, which is acceptable to the Respondents, also. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.