CW 6700/08 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6700/08 Smt. Rajesh Kanwar Versus State & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 21/07/2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. Sanjay Gangwar, for petitioner *** Counsel submits that petitioner is working as ANM and selected on the basis of merit for General Nursing Training which is of three years duration. Her only grievance is that training period has not been considered on deputation which has been examined by Division Bench of this court in D.B. Special Appeal No.1468/06, Shri D.S. Nathawat Vs. The Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal & Ors., decided on 3rd March, 2008. But, despite legal notice being served, still the same has not been considered by the respondents. Relevant part of judgment [supra] is reproduced as under: “Consequently, we allow this appeal and set aside the order of the Single Judge dated 12.4.2006 and also that of Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal dated 9.6.1993 and it is declared that the time spent by the appellant from 13.3.1986 until the successful completion of 3 year general nursing course shall be treated as period on deputation. All consequential benefits will accordingly follow. The parties shall bear their own costs.” CW 6700/08 [2] In the light of judgment [supra] and without going into merits of the matter at this stage, this court considers it appropriate to direct the petitioner to make a fresh representation pointing out her grievance within a period of one month from today before the competent authority, who is directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a speaking order within three months thereafter. Copy of their decision be communicated to petitioner also. If still petitioner feels aggrieved by their decision, she will be free to avail remedy available to her under law. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA6700CW2008 21-7.doc