( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION USJ CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1438 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1438 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1438 OF 2005 IN IN IN SECOND APPEAL NO.896 OF 2005 SECOND APPEAL NO.896 OF 2005 SECOND APPEAL NO.896 OF 2005 Nana Bhagwan Kolte ..Applicant V/s. Vithal Bhau Kolte & Anr. ..Respondents ...... Ms.A.R.S. Baxi for the applicant Mr.M.V. Rawool i/by P.B.Shah for respondent Nos.1 & 2. ...... CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 24th April, 2009 DATED : 24th April, 2009 DATED : 24th April, 2009 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The appellant has filed Civil Application so as to protect his possession in regard to the land in regard to which the suit is filed. It is seen that the order of status-quo passed on 29th August, 2005 is running and operating. In my view this is not the stage where Court should record any positive finding whether the appellant is in possession or otherwise. The order of status-quo is operating for last more than 3 years and it can be continued till the disposal of the appeal, as it is clear that both the parties know what is status-quo. In view of the above, Civil Application is disposed of by passing following order. ( 2 ) ORDER ORDER ORDER . Pending the hearing and final disposal of the appeal, both the parties shall maintain status-quo which was in progress as of 29th August, 2005. There shall be no order as to costs. (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.)