1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3305 / 2011 (Arunkumar Punjabrao Malwar and others vs. Nagpur Municipal Corporation ) .................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... CORAM : D.D.SINHA & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ DATED : 17th November, 2011 Heard Mr D N Mathur, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr J B Kasat for respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks oral permission to implead the State of Maharashtra (Through Its Secretary, Urban Development Department Mantralaya,Mumbai-32) as a party respondent. The request being of a formal nature, the same is granted. Appropriate amendment in the cause title be carried out forthwith. Mrs. T.D.Khade, learned AGP waives notice on behalf of added- respondent. The instant Writ Petition is directed against the order/ communication dated 18.12.2009 issued by the Town Planner, Municipal Corporation, Nagpur whereby the building plan submitted by the petitioners for grant of sanction came to be rejected on the ground that the land in question i.e. Khasra No.64 of Mouza 2 Indora is reserved for State Transport Stand in the Development Plan of City of Nagpur. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the reason given by the Town Planner is incorrect as per the information sought by the petitioners under the Right to Information Act, 2005, which is otherwise. Be that as it may; the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty to file a representation to the State Government against the impugned communication dated 18.12.2009 within a period of four weeks along with necessary evidence to substantiate their stand and prayed that direction be given to the State Government to decide the same within a stipulated period. In view of the above-referred facts, we dispose of the petition by giving liberty to the petitioners to make a representation accordingly within a period of four weeks. If such a representation is made, we direct the State Government to consider the same in accordance with law and take a decision thereon within a period of six weeks from the date of communication of this order. JUDGE JUDGE sahare