IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 1077 of 2002 Between: Govindachandra Harichandana Jagdev S/o.Late Laxminarayana Harichandana Jagdev, R/o.Temple Palace, Tekkali Town and Mandal, Srikakulam Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Dist.Collector, Srikakulam Dist at Srikakulam. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tekkali, Srikakulam Dist. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Tekkali Mandalam, Srkakulam Dist. ..RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR M.SESHU REDDY FOR MR A.M.RAO Counsel for the Respondents: --- The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is ﬁled for the following substantive relief: “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing the impugned notice Rc.No.9/2002 dt.8-1-2001 as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and ultravires the fundamental rights guaranteed under Constitution of India and to consequently set aside the impugned notice dt.8-1-2001 and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems ﬁt and proper in the circumstances of the case.” At the hearing, Sri M.Seshu Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri A.M.Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 10th November, 2008 vrn