IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 12979 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: May 27, 2010. Kishan ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Haryana ...... RESPONDENT(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Malik.A.G., Haryana. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No.205 dated 19.04.2010, under Sections 25/54/59 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station Nuh, District Mewat. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. This Court while issuing notice of motion on 05.05.2010 passed the following order:- “Argues that no fire-arm was allegedly recovered from the possession of petitioner-accused and that he was also not CRM No.M-12979 of 2010 identified by anybody at the spot and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Notice of motion for 27.5.2010. However, petitioner is directed to join the investigation and in case he is arrested, he shall be released on interim bail by the Arresting Officer to his satisfaction subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has already joined the investigation pursuant to said order dated 05.05.2010. It has also been stated by learned counsel for the State, on instruction from HC.Dharmender, that petitioner has joined the investigation and that he is no more required for any custodial interrogation. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, in view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of Kishan, is accepted and order dated 05.05.2010 granting interim bail in favour of the petitioner is, hereby, made absolute subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) May 27, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2