1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER SB Civil Writ Petition No. 3549/2010 Rajendra Prasad Kedia Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 18.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Ajeet Bhandari - for the petitioner Mr GS Bapna, Advocate General – for the State Dr PC Jain – for respondent BY THE COURT: The matter has come up on application under Article 226(3) of the Constitution of India for vacation of stay order passed by this court on 16.3.2010. Learned Advocate General submits that respondent- Rajasthan Housing Board has issued order dated 4.8.2010 fixing preference of petitioner in 4% quota meant for the category to which petitioner belongs. Petitioner would be allotted house in order of his priority in the category for which he has made application. Mr Bhandari shows his satisfaction to aforesaid, 2 however, prayer is that petitioner's case may be considered by the respondent-Board in the allotment so made for the year 2009-10 by calculating aforesaid 4% quota. If, as per priority of petitioner, he is entitled to get house in HIG then necessary allotment may be made. After hearing learned counsel for parties, I am of the view that petitioner has already been given priority pursuant to the order dated 4.8.2010 i.e. in regard to 4% quota meant for the category to which petitioner belongs. In view of aforesaid, main grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. Respondent may now undertake exercise for allotment of house if petitioner is falling in priority of 4% quota and allotment becomes due after fixing his priority. Necessary exercise may be carried out within three months from today. In view of aforesaid, writ petition as also the application are disposed of. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma 3