1 16 wp.8654.11 ndm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8654 OF 2011 Vaishali Lata Mahesh Shelolikar. ... Petitioner Versus Beena Suresh Tendulkar @ Mrs. Maitreyi Dinesh Rane. ... Respondent ----- Mr. Haresh Shivdasani for the Petitioner. Mrs. Ranjana Parikh for the Respondent. ----- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 24 th November, 2011. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2 The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the Respondent in the pending Appeal states that she has no objection if the compensation amount is reduced to Rs.3,000/- per month provided the hearing of the appeal is expedited. 2 16 wp.8654.11 3 Hence, the petition is disposed of by passing the following order: i. The impugned order dated 19 th March, 2011 passed by the Appeal Bench of the Court of Small Causes is modified only to the extent that the compensation payable by the Petitioner shall be Rs.3,000/- per month instead of Rs. 5,000/- per month; ii. Hearing of the pending appeal is expedited ; and iii. All contentions of the parties on merits of the appeal are kept open. [ A.S.OKA, J ]