1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.1561 OF 2010. Ahkude Shivaji S/o Ambadasrao Age 53 years, Occ.Sr. Clerk, Tahsil Lohara, R/o Tuljapur, Kasar galli, Opp.Vidya Mandir, Tuljapur, Dist.Osmanabad. ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. ... Respondents. ... Mrs.A.N.Ansari, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.K.Kadam, Asstt. Govt.Pleader for the State. ... CORAM : P.V.HARDAS AND : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,JJ. Date : 08.04.2010. PER COURT 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, by which the 2 petitioner prays for quashing and setting aside the order passed by the Aurangabad Bench of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, dated 18.2.2010, in Original Application No.979/2009 and also prays to declare that the date of birth of the petitioner is 15.2.1056 and not 15.2.1952. 2. The Tribunal while considering the aforesaid challenge in the original application, directed the Respondent authorities therein to conduct an inquiry for deciding the correct birth date of the present petitioner after giving adequate opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in the said inquiry. The Tribunal accordingly decided the original application as well as Misc. Application. 3. On notice of this petition being issued to the Respondents, the Respondents have filed their affidavit-in-reply and at para 8 of the affidavit-in-reply it is stated that the Collector has issued directions to the Sub- Divisional Officer, Osmanabad on 5.3.2010 for conducting a detailed inquiry as per the order 3 passed by the Tribunal. It is further stated that the inquiry has been initiated and notice has been issued to the petitioner calling upon him to remain present for the inquiry. 4. In that light of the matter and in the light of the fact that dispute was raised by the petitioner regarding recording of correct date of birth, according to us no interference is called for in the order of the Tribunal. Since the inquiry has already been initiated, we expect that the petitioner shall cooperate whole- heartedly in the expeditious conclusion of the inquiry and we also hope that the Respondent authorities expeditiously conclude the inquiry keeping in mind the fact that the petitioner has now retired from service. 5. With the aforesaid observations, this Writ Petition is summarily dismissed with no order as to costs. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) (P.V.HARDAS,J.) asp/office/wp1561.10 4