IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 14367 of 2008 Between: Mrs. M. Kanta Leela, W/o. T. Ravi Kumar, A.P. Residential School (Boys), Borbanda, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 A.P. Residential Education Institutions Society (Regd), Hyderabad, Rep by its Secretary 2 The Principal, A.P. Residential School (Boys), Borbanda, Hyderabad. 3 A.Q. Nasar, Physical Education Teacher, A.P. Residential School (Boys), Borbanda, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus or otherwise declaring the proceedings Rc.No. 14386/A2- 2/06 dt. 30-5-2008 and Proceedings Rc.No. 6249/A2- 2/2008 dt. 24-6-2008, issued by the 1st respondent, as arbitrary, illegal, malaﬁde and unconstitutional, violating Articles 14 and 21 of the constitution of India and set aside the same. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.V.KRISHNAIAH Counsel for the Respondents: MR.K.DURGA PRASAD The Court made the following : ORDER: The petitioner is working as Physical Education Teacher in the A.P. Residential Education Institutions Society, the ﬁrst respondent herein. Through order, dated 30.05.2008, the ﬁrst respondent transferred the petitioner from the Residential School (Boys), Borabanda, Hyderabad; to a Residential School (Girls) at Pochampad, on administrative grounds. The same is challenged in this Writ Petition. It is stated that the transfer was eﬀected, only with a view to accommodate the third respondent herein. Respondents 1 and 2, on the one hand, and the third respondent, on the other, ﬁled separate counter- affidavits. It is stated that ever since she was posted at Borabanda, the petitioner did not report to duty, at all, and left with no alternative, the ﬁrst respondent passed the impugned order. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2 and learned counsel for the third respondent. While admitting the writ petition on 08.07.2008, this Court took note of the facts that led to this case and it was directed that the petitioner shall join the duty at Pochampad, on account of the fact that ever since 19.11.2006, on which date, she was transferred to Borabanda, she did not report to duty at all. In view of the complaint of the petitioner that 3rd respondent is brought to Borabanda, a direction was issued to the eﬀect that the said teacher shall be continued in the institution at Maheshwaram, until further orders. Today, it is represented that the petitioner did not report to duty at the institution at Pochampad, at all. When it is found that the petitioner has not only defy the orders of the ﬁrst respondent-society, but also those passed by this Court, she cannot be entitled to any relief. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ Dt.06.08.2008 L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J GJ