IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15180 of 2011 SINTU KUMAR @ BAUDHA SINGH @ SITU KUMAR, SON OF SHRI ARUN KUMAR SINGH. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 11.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. By an order dated 28.4.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. 13153 of 2010, the petitioner was refused bail since the Informant had identified the petitioner in the Test Identification Parade as one of the miscreants. The prayer for bail has been renewed on the ground that now the Informant has been examined during trial and in its cross-examination, it is stated that the Police had got the petitioner identified in the Police Station whereafter he identified the petitioner in the Test Identification Parade. Considering the same, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura, in Sheikhpura P.S. Case No. 204 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other shall be the father of the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish 2 information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)