IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33521 of 2009 SHRIMATI RENU DEVI & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR 5 25.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. The office has reported that the complete carbon copy of case diary has not been received as yet. Perusal of record shows that petitioner No.1 was Mukhiya at the relevant time whereas petitioner No. 2 is husband of petitioner No. 1. It would appear from the record that the S.D.O., Sikarahna conducted an inquiry and he found that the distribution register does not contain the signature of these petitioners and it was Panchayat Sewak who distributed the amount in question among the forged persons. It is surprisingly enough that the concerned BDO has not been made accused in this case. In the aforesaid circumstances, I think it proper to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail petition is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within 30 days from the receipt of the order, the petitioners, namely, Shri Mati Renu Devi and Upendra Thakur shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Ghorasahan P.S. Case No. 79 of 2009 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, - 2 - Motihari subject to conditions as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.),