..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3059 OF 2008 Vicky @ Victor Julias Manthera. ..Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .... Mr.Sudhir Halli, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste, APP, for State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 5th September, 2008. DATED : 5th September, 2008. DATED : 5th September, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. By order dated 16.6.2006 the applicant came to be granted bail in C.R. No.177 of 2006 of Khopoli police station in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with one solvent local surety in the like amount. 3. The learned Advocate for the applicant submitted that the applicant hails from a very poor financial background, hence it was not possible for him to get necessary surety. Hence, it is prayed that the surety amount may be reduced. It is also ..(2).. prayed that the condition of local surety may be deleted. 4. The applicant has produced ration-card and other documents which show that he is a permanent resident of Mumbai. Hence, the condition of furnishing local surety is deleted. Looking to the facts of this case and the other facts I am inclined to reduce the amount of surety from Rs.20,000/- to Rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like amount and P.R. bond in the like amount. The applicant shall report to Khopoli police station once in a fortnight till disposal of the trial. Rest of the conditions in the order dated 16.6.2006 are maintained. 5. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)