IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 9831 of 2008. Decided on: 21.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Bansi Lal. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. J.R. Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): The case of the petitioner, as per pleadings is that though he had been working with the respondent-department as Pipe Fitter, he has been regularised as Beldar. Consequently, there shall be a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in view of the law laid down by this Court in Gauri Dutt and others Vs. State of H.P., Latest HLJ, 2008 (HP) 366, within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner, from due date. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - 2. Accordingly, in view of the observations made hereinabove, the petition stands disposed, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 21, 2010. (sck).