IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23405 of 2009 ROSHAN KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 30.07.2009 Heard both sides. Sole petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is that he interpolated with the bank document and got the amount withdrawn which was allotted in favour of the informant for construction of Indira Awash. The amount involved in the case was Rs. 21,000/-. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that apart from the petitioner, Mukhiya and Gram Sevak are also accuseds. It is further contended that co-accused, namely, Manju Devi (Mukhiya) has been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by the court below. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner, if directed, shall deposit the amount alleged to have been embezzled by the petitioner in the Nazarat of the concerned Block or in the Civil Court itself which shall, of course, be without prejudice to the right claim/defence of the petitioner in the case. Considering the aforesaid submissions and also taking into consideration the fact that some of the accuseds have been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by the court below 2 itself, this court is inclined to grant the privilege of bail to the petitioner. Petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with singheswar P.S. Case no. 51 of 2008, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs. 21,000/- in the manner noted above. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)