THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.1930 of 2011 Dated 17th June, 2011 Between: T.Rama Murthy and others …Petitioners And Kaviti Byragi …Respondent Counsel for the petitioners: Sri K.Pavan Kumar For Sri K.Vinay Kumar Counsel for respondent: -- The Court made the following: ORDER: This civil revision petition arises out of order, dated 31.12.2010, in C.M.A.No.3 of 2008 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Sompeta. The petitioners are the defendants in the suit filed by the respondent for permanent injunction. Along with the suit, the respondent filed I.A.No.86 of 2005 for temporary injunction. The said application having been dismissed by order, dated 13.03.2008, the respondent filed C.M.A.No.3 of 2008 in the Court of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Sompeta, who by order, dated 31.12.2010, disposed of the same by directing the parties to maintain status quo. At the hearing, Sri K.Pavan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, fairly submitted that since his clients are in possession and enjoyment of the suit property, the order of status quo would not affect their interests. However, he contends that in order to put a quietus to the disputes between the parties, the trial Court may be directed to dispose of the suit at an early date. Having regard to the above submission of the learned counsel, the civil revision petition is disposed of without interfering with the order under revision with the direction to the learned Junior Civil Judge, Tekkali, to dispose of O.S.No.47 of 2005 within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. As a sequel to disposal of the civil revision petition, C.R.P.M.P.No.2718 of 2011 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 17th June, 2011 VGB