1 jdk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION ST. NO. 2290 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7011 OF 2007 Atpadi Education Society Atpadi, and Anr. ..Applicants Vs. Smt.Sushama Jaysingrao Deshmukh and Ors. ..Respondents .... Mr.Dilip Bodake Adv. for Applicants Mr.N.V.Bandiwadekar Adv. for Respondent No.1 Mr.S.D.Rayarikar AGP for Respondent No.3 .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. DATE : MARCH 22, 2010 IN CHAMBER AT 2.40 P.M. P.C.: 1 Heard the learned advocate for the applicants, learned advocate for respondent no.1 and learned AGP for respondent no.3. 2 The learned counsel for the parties agree that as far as payment of back wages is concerned, there was an amicable settlement 2 between both the parties in which the original Petitioner had agreed that she would not claim back wages from the Management and the Management had agreed that they would submit salary pay bills to respondent no.4-Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Sangli. Hence, in view of this, by consent the second sentence in paragraph 6 of the order passed by this Court, dated 12th October, 2009 which reads as “As per the approval order granted by Respondent No.4 on 20.8.2009 the responsibility for payment of back wages and other consesquential benefits is that of the Respondent-Management ” shall be substituted and read as “The Management shall submit the salary bills of the Petitioner to the Respondent No.4 in the original writ petition i.e. Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Sangli in respect of the period from 20.10.1997 to 31.3.2009 within a period of six weeks from today. The Respondent No.4-Education Officer shall process and take decision on the said bills within a period of eight weeks thereafter ”. 3 The order dated 12th October, 2009 passed by this Court, shall stand modified accordingly. 4 Review Petition is disposed of. [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]