IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 4319 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: May 12, 2011. Sandeep Singh Dhillon. ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus Kulwinderjit Kaur. ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Petitioner in person with Mr. Parminder Singh-I, Advocate for the petitioner. Respondent in person with Mr. Yashpal, Advocate for the respondent. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing order dated 15.04.2010, Annexure P1 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Patiala vide which application of petitioner filed under Order 9 Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure read with Section 151 of CPC for restoration of the divorce petition, was dismissed. CR No.4319 of 2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner handed over a Demand Draft of `15,00,000/- to respondent-wife pursuance to order passed by this Court on the last date of hearing i.e. 10.02.2011 as the entire dispute between the parties has since been settled as per the statements of both the parties recorded by this Court on that day. Both the parties are bound by the said statements. Hence, the present revision petition stands disposed of accordingly. However, it is made clear that if both the parties file a petition for divorce by mutual consent under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act (for short the ‘Act’) as per their statements recorded before this Court, the dismissal of earlier petition for divorce under Section 13 of the Act filed by the petitioner-husband would be having no effect upon the same. (RAM CHAND GUPTA) May 12, 2011 JUDGE ‘om’ 2