.-s^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 2042 of2005 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Smt. Shanta Electa Gulab Lakara W/b Shri Xaviour Francis Tirfcey, aged about 42 years, .4ssistant Professor ((jeogi'aphy) Govt. NES P.G. College Jashpur Nagai\ Distt. Jashpur (CG). VERSUS 1. State of Clihattisgarh tlirougli the Principal Secretaiy, Department of Higtier Education, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. The Coimiiissioner/Director Higher Education Go\±of Cliliattisgarh Govt. Science College Campus Hostel No. 4Raipur(CG). 3. The Principal, Go\7t. NE8 P.G. College, Jashpur Nagm\ Distt. Jashpur (CG). (WTUT PETITION UM)ER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTnTITION OF INDIA) (SB: Honrb!e Mr. Satish K. AgnihotrL J.) Present : Shri N.K. Malviya, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Deputy Advocate General \vith Shi-i M.P.S. Bhatia, Deputy Cro\l. Advocate forthe State. O.RALORD;£R (Passed on 19til day ofMarch, 2009) Witii the consent ofthe parties, the matter is taken up for hearmg finaily. 1. Leamed counsel appearing fbr the petitioner submits that the case ofthe petitioiier is identica! to the case ofDr. Smt. Sarojbala Shyag Bislmoi Vs. State of Cliliattisgarh & Otliers (W.P. No. 4099/2003). Leamed counsel farther submits that the present petition may also be disposed ofin the same - temis as passed in the matter ofDr. Smt. Sarojbala Shyag Bishnoi (Supra). 2. SM Thakur, lcanied Deputy Advocate General, appearing for the State, submits fhat he has no objectioii if^the saiiie order is passed in the present petition also. 3. Accordmgly, the petition is disposed of-in the same teniis i.e. havmg considered and without expressing any opmion on merits ofthe case, in the opinion ofthis court, ends ofjustice will be serv'ed ifa direction is given to the petitioner to make a detailed representation raising his/her gi'ievances before the competent authority/respondent No. 2 along with a copy of the petition and this order, within a month, and on such representation being filed, the competent authority/respondent No. 2 shall decide the same on its own merits, in accordance with law, as early as possibie preferably within tl'ii'ee months from the date ofreceipt ofthe representation. It is made clear that if any grievance still subsists, the petitioner may avail the remedy available under the law. No order asto costs. 4. Consequently, pending applications, ifany, stand disposed of Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Sahu