HSGH CDURT GF CHH$JT5$GARW EIL£SPUR Wi’it ?et§tien NG 1571 of 29M Petitioner Baia Ram Sahu. S/o. Late Kripa Ram Sahu, aged abaut 54 years, NAIB TAHASILDAR, DaiKi—Rajhara Ric. Qr. No.32«D 3A, Dam Rajhara, Tah. Baied, Distt‘ Eurg (CG). u wefsLKS Resbondenis 1. Assit. Estate Officer. Office 0% Eskate Gfficef’s. Bhiiai Steel Plant, Dam Rajhara. Tah.rBa§od, Disit. Duig (CG). Dy. Generai Manager (Mines), Bhila§ Stee5 Piant, 53am Rajhara, Tah. Eabd, Distt. Durg (CG). Bhiiai Steak Piam, tha‘ough' Maiwagmg whack”, §spat Bhawan, Bhiiai! Dsitfic’t Durg (CG). M )it. (Wa'it Petmon undef Articie 226 of Const§tut§on of mdia) $8: Han’bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihmri. J, Present: $hri A$hok Das Vaishnav with Shri Samee! Sahu, counse! for the petitioner. Shré VR. Tiwari,‘counse! for ihe respondents. {)RAL Gi‘tDER {Pawed on ihi5 3Qth'day of SeptembensimOB) By this petition under Aiticie 22$ 0f the Consiitutien of indie, the petitéener seeks the faHowing reiiefs. Te issue a writ or directéon ’in ihe nature of certim‘ari whieh may be issued by this Court to quash the iiiegai, arbitraw anci unreasonabie. Netice/order dated 22-3—20Q1 (Armexure PW) and Notice/weer dated 28-6—2001 (Amexure PfQ) issued by the respcndents’2 ,,;E§ 2) The petitioner, thus, m substanca is seeking quashSng 0f Annexures Pl'.’ & vP/Q whemby the respandents ordered for. enhancement of rent, canceliation of a§iotmem and disconnection of eiectricéty, fespectiveiy. 3) A bare perusai of the averments in the writ petition reveais that the» ‘ petitioner’s eniire ciaim in the writ petition is based on the disputed questions of facts, which cannot be gone into in the writ proceedings under Articie 226 at the Constitutien of india as the parties wenid be required to iead evidence in suepori of their riva! ciaims. 4) in View of the foregcing, i am not inciined to entertain the Writ petition n exercise of discretionary jurisdictiun under Anicie 226 9f the Constitution at indie with the liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedies which may be avaiiabie to e petitioner Lander the reievant provisions of iaw, before the appropriate oivii court. 5. With the above iiberty, the writ oetition stands disposeo of“ Consequentiy, interim order passed eariier shaii stand discharged and the pending appiications, if any, aiso stand diseased ‘,x'Wof./ i - Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri r, 39999.net a i i th