IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 170 OF 2004 OF MOTION NO. 170 OF 2004 OF MOTION NO. 170 OF 2004 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 2629 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 2629 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 2629 OF 2002 Shri Suresh B. Gandhi & Ors. ... Petitioners V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Devendra B. Shukla for the petitioner. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 29th September, 2006 : 29th September, 2006 : 29th September, 2006 P.C. . On queries to learned counsel, if any of the petitioner is aged over of 65 years, the learned counsel says that they are not. In view of that, it is not possible to expedite the petition. Hence, relief of expediting the hearing rejected. 2. Insofar as prayer clause (a) is concerned, this Court cannot direct the respondents to execute the order passed in Writ Petition No. 1801 of 2001. It is open for the petitioner to take appropriate praecipe in that petition. 3. Motion disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]