1 S.B.CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO.322/2007 LRs of Mohan Das v. Ravindra Kumar Date of Judgment :: 10 th March, 2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. Sajjan Singh] Mr. J.K.Bhaiya ] for the appellants. .... This appeal as per provisions of Section 100 Code of Civil Procedure is preferred to challenge validity, propriety and correctness of the judgment and decree dated 12.4.2007 passed by learned Additional District Judge No.1, Bhilwara affirming the judgment and decree dated 18.11.2004 passed by learned trial court i.e. Civil Judge (JD), West, Bhilwara. On 18.11.2004, the trial court while accepting a suit for recovery of arrears of rent and eviction from the rented premises, passed a decree for eviction from the rented premises within a period of two months with recovery of arrears of rent and mesne profit. The appellate court by judgment dated 12.4.2007 affirmed the judgment and decree passed by the trial court. While assailing validity of the judgments and decree referred above, the contention of counsel 2 for the appellant is that the trial court committed manifest perversity while considering the point of bonafide need. I have examined the judgments impugned. The finding given by the trial court regarding bonafide necessity as well as comparative hardship is based on sound appreciation of facts and such finding of fact do not constitute any substantial question of law, warranting adjudication by this Court in its second appellate jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. ( GOVIND MATHUR ),J. Kkm/ps.