H COURT OF CHHATTI56ARH AT BILASFU ' M § R Writ Perifian (5! No. 3924 of 2QO8 Pefi'fioner Rupeshwar Singh Thukur aged abau‘t bou? 47 years, Son c ,Phagu Singh Thnkur, at reset Woking as a Fares? Guard, /o. OH Foresf Co!ony, Kumha Pam, Jagdalpur, DisWicf Eastev .6.) Versus Respnwen-rs 1. 511312 of Chha'H’isgarh, Through : The Secrefary, Fares? Departmen D.K.5. Bhuwnn, Rnipur (Ga). 2. hief Conserva'for of Forest Fares? Depnrfmem, Raipur (C.6.) 3. Coriservufor of Forest, Jagdaipur Circle, Dis-rick uer (C.G.) 4. Divisional Foresr Officer, Bnsrer Fares? Division, n'l' agdalpur, Disw-ic Bur (6.5.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CO&§TITUTIQQ QF INDIA Single 3mm: : Hon’ble Mr. Sqsh K. Agnihofri, J, Shri Vishnu Kosfha, dvaca'l’a for 'H1e pzfi'rinner. Panel Lawyer, 5hri Y. for S. The Thakur, responden‘rs/Siufe. Deputy Advoca‘re (Bauer-a! ' with Shri P. K. Bhoduri, Q x, cw, ORAL G$3ER (Passed en 1his 23w day of Jub', 2008) 1. Wi‘rh The canszn'r of ieamed counsel oppanvkng for fhe par-ties, +112 pafifion is heard finnHy. 2. learned counse! appearing for the pe‘ti-Honer suhmi+s 'Hm'l' fhe pe'rih‘oner does nof wom fo press fhis pe‘ri‘rion on merii's, of +his \ s-rage. However, +he responden'r ou'rhorifies may be direcfed +a , f a Pn r Q r (6 t C t Bst J v ste ?i A camider and decide ‘I'he pending represen‘fafim dafed 18.7.2008 (Annexure P/4), an ifs awn meri'fs, in accordance wi'fh law, wi‘l'hin 1'he prescribed fime. 5hri Yashwan'!‘ Singh Thakur, learned Depufy Advom‘re General, appearing for fhe respnnden'i’s/si’a‘m submifs 'Hm't fhe represen'ra'rion dnfed 18.7.2008 (Annexum P/4), shun be nonsidered and decided by ‘H'ie concerned au‘ihnri‘i'y, in accordance with law, an H's awn merifs, within a period of him weeks from +he da+e of receip'i of o copy of 'H‘iis order. 5hri Thakur further submits maf no coercive steps shali be inken. grill fhe disposal of fhe. reprzgn-m‘rion. In view of 1412 foregoing, The pe‘fH'ion sfands disposed of. No order asfo c0515. " Sdl— 7 Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur-