1 2091.11 SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2091 OF 2011 Sandip Suresh Garate ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Rakesh Bhatkar for Petitioner. Mr.A.B.Vagyani, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED:- MARCH 23, 2011. P.C. 1. In deference to the observations made by the Court, Counsel for the petitioner submits that in that case, the petitioner will not pursue the reliefs claimed in this Petition. However, the petitioner be permitted to withdraw this Petition with liberty to make representation to the Chief Minister in respect of issues pertaining to Ratnagiri District with regard to the process of appointment to the post of Shikshan Sevak. 2. Accordingly, this Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to pursue his remedy before the Chief Minister as desired. We 2 2091.11 express no opinion either way as to whether the petitioner can make such representation to the Chief Minister or whether the Chief Minster is free to interdict the process inspite of his own order passed on February 23, 2011. 3. Petition disposed of accordingly. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)