BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirty First day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.14149 of 2011 A. SAKTHIVEL ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.7 Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PERAVORANI POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT CR NO.172/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.VENKATESWAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDI, Addl.Public Prosecutor(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest, at the hands of the respondent police, the petitioner, who is an accused in Crime No.172 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b) and 506(ii) of I.P.C and Section 3(i) of TNPDL Act, has come forward with this petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of prosecution, a relative woman of the petitioner died in the hospital. Alleging that the death was due to the negligence of the doctors, the petitioner and others indulged in a road roko. At that time, the Tahsildar and other Officials came to the place of occurrence and tried to persuade them. It is alleged that the petitioner instead of getting persuaded, caused extensive damage to the jeep and other properties of the Government. The loss is estimated at Rs.1,03,000/- With these allegations, the present petition has been filed. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has got nothing to do with the offence. He is only bystanders. Though the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is attractive, as of now, there are no other materials against the petitioner to show that he has participated in the occurrence. 4. Considering the circumstances in which the occurrence has happened, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pattukkottai, Thanjavur District, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner should deposit a sum of Rs.5,000/- before the learned Magistrate and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. Sd/- 31/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PATTUKKOTTAI, THANJAVUR DT 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PERAVORANI POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DT 3 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. R.VENKATESWAR Advocate SR.No.37152 ssk/01.11.2011 /5c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14149 of 2011 Date :31/10/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/