IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No .M-36644 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 19.12.2011 Naveen Kumar ......Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L.N. MITTAL. Present: Mr. Rajesh Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. *** L.N. MITTAL, J. (Oral). Learned counsel for the petitioner states that instant petition for anticipatory bail has been rendered infructuous because the petitioner has since been arrested and released on bail. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. December 19, 2011 (L.N. MITTAL) harjeet JUDGE