1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR W.P.No.861 of 2008 (Ramesh Maroti Kumbhekar and anr. vs. State & Ors.) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CORAM : D.D.Sinha and Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, JJ. DATE : 3.3.2008. Heard Mr. S.J.Khandalkar, Adv. for the Petitioners and Mrs.Bodade, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent nos. 1 and 2. Counsel for the petitioner states that vide communication dt. 5.10.2007 the petitioners were informed by the Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Babhulgaon that though cognizance is taken by the said Authority of the complaint filed by the petitioners for allotment of houses to the persons other than those who are below poverty line, however, no final decision in this regard has been taken by the Block Development Officer on the said complaint and therefore, the petitioners have approached this Court. Considered the contentions canvassed by the learned counsel. Perused the impugned communication which demonstrates that the Block Development Officer has already communicated to the petitioners that the grievance of the petitioners made in the complaint 2 would be considered within one month and appropriate action according to law would be taken, if necessary. In that view of the matter, in the present Writ Petition, no fresh direction, as such, is necessary. Hence the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioners are at liberty to approach the said Authority for expediting the proceedings, if they are not decided till this date. JUDGE JUDGE ssj