1 1312.11-ao IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1312 OF 2011 Jayantilal Harishchandra Bhandari and another. ... Appellants. V/s. Mumbai Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others. ... Respondents. Drupad Patil for the appellants. Ms.K.K.Soran for respondent No.1. Ashok Purohit for respondent No.8. Shailendra Singh i/b. J.P.Consulti for respondent Nos.9 & 10. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATED : 25th November 2011. P.C. : Since the challenge raised in this appeal from order is in respect of grant ad-interim relief by the trial Court in view of order dated 15th November 2011, this appeal from order can be conveniently disposed of by directing trial Court to dispose of pending notice of motion expeditiously. 2. It is observed by the trial Court that defendant No.1 has not issued DRC in favour of the defendant Nos.9 and 10 till the date of 2 1312.11-ao passing of the order. The same situation be continued until the disposal of the notice of motion. 3. The trial Court is, thus, directed to dispose of pending notice of motion in Suit No.2251/2011 as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within six weeks from the date of receipt of writ of this order. The respondent No.1- Corporation shall be at liberty to file their written statement/ reply before the trial Court along with documents, if any. 4. With the aforesaid directions, appeal from order stands disposed of. In view of disposal of appeal from order, pending civil application does not survive and stands disposed of accordingly. (R.M.BORDE, J.)