IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.372 of 2010 MOSTT.BHAGWANI DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 30.9.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is the mother of respondent no.6 Anirudh @ Narendra Singh seeks a direction to the respondent authorities not to attach the properties of the petitioner. It is alleged that the son of the petitioner has been implicated in a case bearing Bikram Case No.211 of 2000 dated 3.11.2000 for offences under sections 354, 427, 341, 325 of the Penal Code and sections 25(1B), 26, 27 and 37 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there has been partition in the family vide Title Partition Suit No.187 of 2001 in which certain properties has been decreed in favour of the petitioner. He submits that in view of the decree of the Title suit, the property of the petitioner cannot be attached for forcing the appearance of respondent no.6. In support of his contention that the petitioner is living separately, he has annexed a copy of rent receipt at Annexure-5. Learned State counsel submits that respondent no.6 is absconding. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is not inclined to interfere in the matter as the property has already been attached. However, it would be open 2 KHAN to the petitioner to agitate her grievances before the learned court below itself which would be considered and disposed of on its own merits. With the aforesaid liberty, this application stands disposed of. (S.P.Singh,J)