THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA C.R.P. Nos. 6093 and 6094 of 2009 Common order: These two C.R.Ps. are directed against the separate orders dated 03.12.2009, passed by the Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kukatpally at Miyapur, in I.A. Nos. 995 and 996 of 2008 in O.S. No. 705 of 2008, filed by the respondent-plaintiff praying to receive documents, namely original and certified copies to substantiate their claim and to recall P.W.1 for marking them in evidence. The respondent-plaintiff filed suit in O.S. No. 519 of 2003, for eviction and mesne profits against the petitioner-defendant on the file of the I Junior Civil Judge, Hyderabad West and South, Ranga Reddy District. The said suit was transferred to the Court of the Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kukatpally at Miyapur, and re-numbered as O.S. No. 705 of 2008. After framing of issues, the petitioner-defendant filed application praying to amend the written statement, and the same was rejected. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner-defendant filed revision, and the same was allowed by this Court, permitting the petitioner- defendant to amend the written statement. While so, the respondent- plaintiff filed the present applications praying to receive additional documents, namely original and certified copies and to recall P.W.1 for marking them in evidence. The petitioner-defendant contested the said application. However, the Court below by reason of the orders under revision, allowed them. The learned counsel for the petitioner-defendant submits that the there is no pleading in the plaint with respect to the documents, which the respondent-plaintiff seeks to receive and mark them in evidence, and in absence of any pleadings, the Court below committed an error in allowing the applications. Hence, he prayed that the orders under revision be set aside and the C.R.Ps. be allowed. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondent- plaintiff submitted that since the petitioner-defendant was permitted to amend the written statement, the necessity to file additional documents arose, and as such, the respondent-plaintiff filed the present applications praying to receive additional documents and recall P.W.1 for marking them in evidence, and the Court below, has rightly allowed the same by reason of the orders under revision, and no interference is called for therewith. Hence, he prayed that the C.R.Ps. be dismissed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner-defendant and the learned counsel for the respondent-plaintiff and the perused the orders under revision. Though no reasons are given by the Court below for allowing the present applications filed by the respondent-plaintiff praying to receive additional documents and recall P.W.1 for marking them in evidence, but having regard to the developments that have taken place subsequent to the allowing of the present applications, namely marking the additional documents as exhibits, I am of the considered opinion that it would not be proper for this Court to interfere with the orders under revision at this stage. Hence, the C.R.Ps. are dismissed. However, the petitioner- defendant is at liberty to produce rebuttal evidence and take objections, if any, to the contents of the documents, which are now received and marked in evidence. The Court below is directed to expedite the disposal of the suit. No costs. ________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 25th January, 2010 KSR