HI6H COURT OF OIHATTISftWN AT BnjWUR W. P.fSlNo. t 4 »f2007 Petitfoner Respondents Versus Mahabir Rcm S/0 shri Jarmale Rem aged d»out46 yeorsft/0 Bosantolo Tehsil Kunkuri District Joshpur [c.e.] 1. Stoteof Chhotti^<rh through;- the Secpetory Tribal Welfore Oeparhnent, D.K.S. Bhnvan, Mantrolaya, Roipur (CjG.) 2. Secretory Oeparhnent of Finance, tSXS. Bhwan, Montrolayn, Raipur (C.6.) 3. Commissfoner, Tribal Welfore Dep«tfrtment,Jashpur (C.S.) 4. Assistont Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Oqwrtment, Dislrict Joshpur (C.6.) SB; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satisli K. AymhoM, J Pcesent: Ms. Binu Pathak, Aih/ocate for the petitioner. Mar. Arvind t>ubey, Ponel Uniyer for State/r«spondents. ORDER (Passed on thte 21*t Dcy of Mffl-ch, 2007) 1. The question of lcn» fnwhwd herein asto whe-rtier the petitkmer is entitled to regular p<y scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from the dote of completion of probatton period. 2. Leorned counsel oppetrjng for -the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly StAmit that the focts and question of kw iwolved the present writ petition ore the same to tiwt of m W. P. (5) No. 5976/2006 (SiBhi'l Tiwari and ottiers vs. Stote eovermnent of CWiattisgarh &others), wihich wos otlowed vide order dated 7.U.20(%. 3. In view of the obove-sttrted submissions made by leamed counsel for the porties, •the iwit petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge &ribhosh