IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.664 of 2008 PUSHPA KUMARI ……Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THRU. VIG. …..Opposite party ----------- 2. 08.12.2008. This revision has been filed against the order dated 10.6.2008 thereby the petition of the petitioner for release of Tata Indica Car bearing Registration No. WB-20B-2920 seized in Spl. Case No. 31 of 2007/ Vigilance Case No. 90 of 2007 has been rejected by the Special Judge (Vigilance)(Trap) Bihar, Patna. Heard learned counsel for both the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is not the accused in this case. The vehicle in question stands in the name of this petitioner. The same is lying uncared in vigilance campus. It is likely to be destroyed as a result of rain and sunlight. It is further submitted that the petitioner is ready to furnish required security and is also ready to furnish an undertaking not to sell the car till the disposal of the case and he shall produce the same as and when required by the court. Considered the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order. The petitioner is not accused in the case and the vehicle in question stands in the name of this petitioner. The vehicle is lying unattended in the open premises of the department. Under the facts and circumstances, this revision is allowed. The court below is directed to release the vehicle in question after verification of the document on proper sureties with an undertaking - 2 - not to sell the same during the pendency of the case and produce the same as and when required by the court. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)