CRM No. M 25141 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 25141 of 2009 Date of decision: 10.03.2010 Manmohan Singh ........ Petitioner Versus Pritam Singh and another .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: None for the petitioner -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) The following order was passed on 15.12.2009 by this Court:- “No one is present on behalf of the petitioner despite the fact that the case has been called out twice. On 05.10.2009 also learned counsel for the petitioner had not appeared despite the case having been called out over twice. Thereafter he had filed an application for preponing the case which was also declined. The conduct of learned for the petitioner does not warrant any further adjournment. However, yet in the interest of justice, one last opportunity is granted to him to argue the matter. Adjourned to 10.03.2010. It is made clear that in case learned counsel for CRM No. M 25141 of 2009 2 the petitioner does not make any attempt to argue the matter on the next date of hearing the petition shall be dismissed for want of prosecution.” However, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner even today despite the fact that the case has been called out twice. In view of the order dated 15.12.2009, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge March 10, 2010 mohan