IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45438 of 2007 SHAMBHU RAI, S/O PARAMHANSH RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BATHNAHA TOLE RAMPUR, P.S.BATHNAHA, DISTT. SITAMARHI. ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. HARI MOHAN PRASAD YADAV, S/O RAM KANDRA RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHAVPRASAD, P.S. DUMRA, DISTT. SITAMARHI. ... ... OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 4. 29.9.2010. The sole petitioner, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has prayed for quashing of an order dated 10.9.2007 in G.R. 948 of 2007 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi. By the said order, the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of offence under Sections 302, 201, 316 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Many grounds have been taken in the present case assailing the order of cognizance. In this case, earlier a report was called for from the court below, which is kept at flag ‘A’. The report indicates that after order of cognizance, the case was committed to the court of Sessions and in this case, altogether five witnesses have already been examined and only informant and 2 N.H./ Investigating Officer have been left to be examined. Keeping in view the subsequent development, the court is of the opinion that it would not be appropriate to interfere with the order of cognizance at this stage. Accordingly, the petition stands rejected. Let a copy of this order be sent to the court below forthwith. Earlier case diary was called for. Office is directed to send back the same to the concerned court. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)