THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.444 of 2011 Date:31.01.2011 Between: Rangisetti Venkayamma ..... Petitioner AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and others .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: None appeared Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2: Government Pleader for Endowments Counsel for Respondent No.3: Sri V.T.M. Prasad, standing counsel for Endowments The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction preferably one in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent No.1 in canceling the sale conformation orders vide Rc.No.N2/43353/2010 dated 25.11.2010 as illegal, void and violative of principles of natural justice and further declare the consequential action of the 3rd respondent in forfeiting/confiscating the amount of Rs.1,03,000/- as illegal, void and consequently to set aside the proceedings in Rc.No.N2/43353/2010, dated 25.11.2010 and consequently direct the respondents to register the land in favour of the petitioner by duly accepting the remaining bid amount along with interest, after conducting survey of the land and after evicting the tenants and pass such other order…” On 21.01.2011, the case was adjourned at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Even today, when the case is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, it is reasonable to presume that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing her cause in the writ petition. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.556 of 2011 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 31st January, 2011 GHN