IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34995 of 2009 ANIL SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 7.10.2009 KHAN Heard counsel for petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case under section 7 of the E.C.Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed an application for quashing of the prosecution in view of the subsequent findings in course of investigation of the case. He further submits that the supervising officer in course of supervision of the case has noted that the food grains in question may not be of F.C.I. In the F.I.R. it has been alleged that the food grains in question is suspected to be misappropriated from the P.D.S. shop. It appears that anticipatory bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected by this court by order dated 5.10.2007 passed in Cr.Misc.No.33471 of 2007 with an observation to surrender and pray for regular bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any reason to differ with the earlier order passed in this case. This application is accordingly dismissed. (S.P.Singh,J)