1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3710 OF 2009 Gajanan Shikshan Prasarak Mandal ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents ..... Mr. P.B. Patil, advocate for the petitioner Mr. V.H.Dighe, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and 6. ..... CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR & S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATED: 18TH JANUARY, 2010 PER COURT:- 1 Heard the counsel for the parties. 2 In so far as the grievance regarding appropriateness of the permission granted to respondent Nos. 4 and 5 is concerned, that grievance cannot be considered in the present proceeding. In as much as the said permission was subject matter of challenge in the proceeding before the Apex Court, in the case of Superstar Education Society Vs. State of Maharashtra in Civil appeal No. 2 1105 of 2008 and companion cases. The Apex Court has confirmed the permission granted to respondent Nos. 4 and 5 on the basis of the representation made by the authorities that the same was as per the prescribed norms. In other words, it is not open for this Court to examine the correctness of those permissions in the present petition. 3. In view of the above, no interference is warranted. This petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to adopt other remedy as may be permissible in law. 4. The petition is disposed of on the above terms. ( S. S. SHINDE. J.) (A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.) rlj/