1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Sixteenth day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) Nos.10272 and 10275 of 2011 BALAKRISHNAN @ BALAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 IN BOTH THE CASES Vs STATE REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, TUTICORIN, ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT IN BOTH THE CASES CRIME NO.31 & 30/2011 IN CRL.OP.Nos.10272 & 10275/2011 For Petitioner : M/S. H.ARUMUGAM Advocate in both the cases For Respondent : MR. A.RAMAR, in both the cases Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, in both the petitions, is arrayed as A2 and he was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 17.07.2011 for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 419, 468, 471 and 420 IPC in Crime Nos.30 and 31 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner in both the petitions would submit that A4 got the power of attorney from the son of A6, who was introduced by A1 and A2 and he sold the property to the de-facto complainant. When the de-facto complainant visited the property, then he came to know that somebody has claimed the title of the property and hence, the complaint has been given by the de-facto complainant. He would further submit that the petitioner is only the attester of the sale deed. He would further submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for enlargement on bail. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner is arrayed as A2 and he is only the attester of the sale deed. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 He would further submit that the investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4.Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that the petitioner is only the attester of the sale deed and the investigation is going on, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, in both the petitions, with certain conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioner, in both the petitions, is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tuticorin, and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m unitl further orders. sd/- 16/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, TUTICORIN 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TUTICORIN 3 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, PALAYAMKOTTAI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, TUTICORIN, 5 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +2. CC to M/S. H.ARUMUGAM Advocate SR.Nos.27693 & 27694 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) Nos.10272 & 10275 of 2011 Date :16/08/2011 TR : 17.08.2011: 2p/8c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/