mGH COURT OF CHHATTISGASH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 2696 of2007 PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS 1. Durga Shankar Diwan Age about 37 year, Asstt. Teacher S/o Shri Durjan Singh Diwan Primary School KhutiyapMa (Sonabal) Block- Kondagaon, Distt- Baster (C.G.) 2. Lakhnu Ram Kange Age about 40 year, Asstt. Teacher S/o Shri Dhaniram Kange Village- Kaharagondi, Post- Puri Distt. - BasEter(C.G.) VERSUS 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department & Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Astt. Commissioner Officer Baster, District-Bastar(C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer Kond^aoii, District- Bastar (C.G.) 4. Treasure & Accounts District-Baslar(C.G.) Bastar, WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA S.B. : HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI SATISHK. AGNIHOTRI Present: Mr. Somkant Venna, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the Stete / respondents. ORDER (Passed on 4B1 day ofMay, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that Ifae fact and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same to Ifaat of in Yashwant Ktunar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}, which has been / disposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents does not controvert the said submission. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in tenns of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Miinidpal Corporation, Durg and anoflier (Supra), subject to verification ofthe fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.T.I. Examination Certificate on their own esqienses as per fte cu-culars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.19^ and fiirtfier whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihoiri Judge ^-