IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 1664 of 2008 Between: Karuturi Subrahmanyam, S/o. Satyanarayana, R/o. 12-4-4, Ramayya Street, Suryaraopeta, Kakinada. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Eastern Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Ltd. Rep by its Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Visakhapatnam. 2 The Divisional Engineer (Operations), Eastern Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Ltd. Kakinada. 3 The Addl. Asst. Engineer (Operations) D6, Eastern Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Ltd. 4 Municipal Corporation of Kakinada, Rep by its Commissioner, Kakinada. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.CH.DHANAMJAYA Counsel for the Respondents: MR.O.MANOHER REDDY The Court made the following : O R D E R: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: ‘It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the 2nd& 3rd respondents herein in not increasing the power load from 1 KW to 4 KW (3 phase) to the Service Connection No.A/24531 and for not providing another two commercial connections and one residential connection to the petitioner’s building at D.No.12-4-4, Ramayya Street, Suryaraopeta, Kakinada, even after submission of Occupancy Certificate vide Permit No.163/2006G2, dated 20-03-2006 by payment of Registration Charges and Deposit amount to the respondents herein, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and for a consequential order directing the respondents to provide Electricity Connections forthwith to the petitioner’s residential building at D.No.12-4-4, Ramayya Street, Suryaraopeta, Kakinada, and pass such other order or orders as may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.’ Sri Ch.Dhnamjaya, learned Counsel for the petitioner, sought for permission of the Court for withdrawal of the Writ Petition. The request of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is accepted. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.2061 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is dismissed. _____________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 14th May, 2008 LUR