IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25008 of 2010 1. Naresh Rajak.son of Mahendra Rajak 2. Doma Ram, son of Jagdish Ram, 3. Mithilesh Rajak, son of Mahendra Rajak 4. Rajesh Rajak, son of Vishundeo Rajak 5. Pappu Rajak, son of vishundeo Rajak 6. Panchu Rajak, son of Chuwharu Rajak Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 26.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Complainant's son is allegedly killed by petitioners. Submission is that cognizance is taken only on basis of complaint that also under the direction of the revisional court. Complaint was lodged after two months of the incident while an FIR was lodged by husband of the informant about missing of his son from the house noticed in the morning. Dead body recovered in the morning. Matter was thoroughly investigated by the I.O. Who submitted final form exonerating petitioners. The main stress is on the point that averment made in the FIR is not similar to the complaint's version, rather a changed story has come. Taking that into consideration, prayer of the petitioner for bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt / production of a copy of 2 this order in connection with Complaint Case No.629 of 2003 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M., Ist Class, Katihar Sri A.V. Singh subject to conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. PN ( Mandhata Singh, J.)