1 nms32.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE O MOTION NO. 32 OF 2011 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 4984 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-II, Mumbai-20 ...Appellant. Vs. M/s. Runwal Developers Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant. Mr. Vishnu S. Hadade for the Respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 8TH JULY, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. Learned Counsel for the respondent opposes the Notice of Motion. 2. In our opinion, the reasons set out in the affidavit in support of Notice of Motion, are not sufficient reasons so as to condone the delay of 522 days. However, in the interest of justice Notice of Motion is made absolute in term of prayer clause (a) and (b) subject to payment of costs of Rs. 5000/- to be paid to the respondent within 2 weeks from today. The office objection be removed within two weeks from today. 3. Notice of Motion disposed off. ( A.A. SAYED, J. ) ( J.P. DEVADHAR , J.)