IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3619 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 26.5.2010. Dr. Avtar Singh ....Petitioner Versus CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJESH BINDAL, J **** Challenge in the present revision petition is to the orders passed by learned Courts below whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC for grant of ad-interim injunction was declined. The petitioner had filed a suit claiming that he being eligible is entitled to allotment of type-IX house in the University Campus and during the pendency of suit the respondents be restrained from allotting the house in question to any one else except the petitioner/plaintiff. The prayer having been rejected by both the Courts below, the petitioner/plaintiff is before this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in case one house is not kept reserved/vacant for allotment to the petitioner/plaintiff, in case he succeeds in the suit filed by him and the same is decreed, his rights will be prejudiced. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any merit in the submissions made. The right of the petitioner to get allotment of Type IX house is yet to be established in the suit filed as evidence of the parties is yet to be led, which may take some time for conclusion. One home of the category to which the petitioner is claiming allotment cannot be kept vacant as the same will not be of any use to any person. In case the petitioner ultimately succeed in suit he will have right to get the decree passed in his favour executed in accordance with law. The revision petition is accordingly dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) 26.5.2010. JUDGE Reema