IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 8587 of 2005 Between: Mohammed Istiyaq Akber, S/o Sultan Mohiuddin, R/o H.No.18-7- 205/C/14, Jahangir Nagar, Talab Katta, Hyderabad. ... PETITIONER AND 1 Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, rep., by its Commissioner, office at Tank Bund, Hyderabad. 2 The Medical and Health Officer, Circle No.1, MCH, Sardar Mahal, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate order writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, to declare the action of the respondents in not shifting the garbage box from the land bearing premises No.18-7- 205/C/14 situated at Jahangir Nagar, Talab Katta, pursuant to my representation dated 18-3-2005 as arbitrary, illegal, unjust and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith act upon the representation dt.18-3-2005 and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.LAYEEQ KHAN Counsel for the Respondents: MR.RAMA RAO GHANTA The Court made the following: ORDER: None appears. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that he is the owner of premises bearing H.No.18-7-205/C/14, Jahangir Nagar, Talab Katta, Hyderabad and the respondent corporation has kept a garbage box in his land and the locality is throwing the garbage in and around the box, as a result of which his land has become garbage yard. Therefore, he approached the respondent corporation on several occasions and requested the second respondent to lift the garbage box from his land at an early date. 3. This Court while issuing notice before admission directed the respondents to consider the application of the petitioner dated 18.03.2005 and take necessary action in accordance with law. In view of the aforesaid interim order, I am of the opinion that no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J March 7, 2008 DSK