IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 82 OF 2010 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 111 OF 2009 Rahul Anant Waghwale .........Appellant V/s Yogita Rahul Waghwale .........Respondents. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda ) Court's or Judge's Orders of Coram, appearances ) Court's orders or directions and ) Registrar's orders. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ms.Smita Kadu, Adv. for the appellant. CORAM: A.P. DESHPANDE AND R.V.MORE, JJ. 19.3.2010 PC: It is seen from the record that the appeal came to be dismissed on 17.7.09 on the first date of hearing as the counsel for the appellant did not remain present. In that view of the matter notice need not be issued to the respondent. It is stated on the application that the counsel attends the 1 court at Mumbai from Pune and because of personal difficulty on account of illness of her son she could not remain present when the matter came to be dismissed for default. For the reasons stated in the application delay is condoned. Impugned order of dismissal of the appeal in default is set aside. Appeal restored to file. Application disposed of. 19.3.10. 2