THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA W.P.M.P.No.16049 of 2009 in W.P.M.P.No.8152 of 2009 and WRIT PETITION No.6241 of 2009 COMMON ORDER: The main grievance of the petitioners is that they filed applications before the 2nd and 3rd respondents seeking conversion of their property bearing D.Nos.9-1-176, 9-1-176/A, 9-1-170 and 9-1-171 of Sarojini Devi Road, Secunderabad, from residential use to commercial use and for building permission as per building byelaws of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, but however, the 2nd and 3rd respondents, without having any authority of insisting to produce ‘No Objection Certificate’, are insisting them to produce such certificate from the 1st respondent. Hence, the writ petition. This Court, while admitting the writ petition on 25.03.2009, in WPMP.No.8152 of 2009 granted interim order directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents to release the building permission without insisting the petitioners on producing No Objection Certificate from the 1st respondent under the Andhra Pradesh Agricultural Land (Conversion for Non-Agricultural Purposes) Act, 2006 (for short “the Act”) subject to the condition that the petitioners give an undertaking that in the event of their failure in the writ petition, they shall pay necessary conversion fees as required under the Provisions of the Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the case on hand is governed by Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, but this Court, in the aforesaid interim order dated 25.03.2009, referred to the Andhra Pradesh Agricultural Land (Conversion for Non-Agricultural Purposes) Act, 2006 (for short “the Act”), which is not applicable, and, as such, the order dated 25.03.2009 passed in W.P.M.P.No.8152 of 2009 needs clarification. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents also conceded the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and also the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, it is clear that inadvertently a mistake has occurred in the order dated 25.03.2009 passed in W.P.M.P.No.8152 of 2009 in W.P.No.6241 of 2009 and, therefore, I deem it appropriate to recall the said interim order and dispose of the writ petition itself with the following direction: “The 2nd and 3rd respondents are directed to consider the application of the petitioner for change of land use and for grant of building permission in respect of the premises bearing D.Nos.9-1-176, 9-1-176/A, 9-1-170 and 9-1-171 of Sarojini Devi Road, Secunderabad, without insisting the petitioners to produce ‘No Objection Certificate’ from the 1st respondent”. Accordingly, the W.P.M.P.16049 of 2009 is ordered recalling the order dated 25.03.2009 passed in W.P.M.P.No.8152 of 2009, and the writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. No order as to costs. _____________ N.V.RAMANA,J 28.07.2009 v v