IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14886 of 2009 1. AMIT KUMAR MISHRA S/O GHANSHYAM MISHRA R/O VILL- DARIAPUR, P.S- SAGAUR, DISTT- BHAGALPUR Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH D.G.P. , C.R.P.F., C.G.O. COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI 2. THE I.G C.R.P.F, PATNA 3. THE D.I.G. null C.R.P.F. DANAPUR, PATNA 4. THE D.I.G. C.R.P.F., MUZAFFARPUR GROUP CENTRE 5. THE COMMANDANT, null C.R.P.F., CUM CHAIRMAN, RECRUITMENT BOARD CENTRE, BEGUSARAI, DISTT- BEGUSARAI 6. THE COMMANDANT, C.R.P.F.-CUM-CHAIRMAN, RECRUITMENT BOARD CENTRE, MOTIHARI, DISTT- GAYA ----------- 03/ 09.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the Union of India. 2. Petitioner was applicant for the post of constable general duty in the C.R.P.F. pursuant to advertisement dated 25.10.2008, as contained in Annexure-1 to this application. He appeared in the selection process, namely, physical measurement, physical skill test and written test as also for the interview and became successful, but his joining was not allowed as selection process pursuant to Annexure-1 itself was cancelled. Later, the authorities have published another advertisement for the post of constable general duty in the C.R.P.F., including the post which were notified under Annexure-1, which is dated 27.7.2009 and is contained in Annexure-10 to this application. 3. It appears from perusal of Annexure-10 that the date for initiation of selection process was fixed as 17.8.2009, but learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner had 2 appeared before the authorities on 17.8.2009 for participating in the selection process, but on 17.8.2009, the authorities for the reasons best known to them, did not proceed with the selection process and till date the selection process has not begun pursuant to Annexure-10, so submitted learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Having heard counsel for the petitioner and the Union of India, I am of the opinion that as and when selection process pursuant to Annexure-10 shall begin, petitioner is at liberty to participate in the same and his case for appointment as constable general duty in the C.R.P.F. should be considered in the light of his performance in the selection process in accordance with law. 5. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. Arjun/ ( V.N. Sinha, J.)