IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2395 of 2007 Surendra Yadav S/o Late Ragho Yadav, residentof Village Audhey PS and District Sheikhpura ....Applicant- Petitioner Versus 1. Sumitra Devi D/o Rajendra Yadav, resident of Village – Bihta, PS and Distt. Sheikhpura 2. Rajendra Yadav son of Late Siri Yadav - Both OP nos. 1 and 2 residents of Village –Bihta, PS and District Sheikhpura...Opp. Parties – Opposite parties ----------- 06- 24.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The applicant of Title Suit (Matrimonial) no.123/05/84 has preferred this application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and raises a grievance with respect to the order dated 12.7.2007, passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court – III, Sheikhpura, whereby the applicant has been directed to make payment of litigation cost amounting to Rs.20,000/-, and maintenance of Rs.500/- per month, to opposite party no.1, during the pendency of the main matter. 2. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner has instituted the suit to dissolve his marriage with opposite party no.1 by a decree of divorce. During the pendency of the proceeding, opposite party no.1 filed the application for interim relief which was allowed by the impugned order. On a perusal of the 2 impugned order, we are of the view that the learned trial court has passed just, proper, and appropriate order. We agree with the same. We do not find any ground for interference with the same. In view of the position that it is with respect to a matrimonial matter, the learned trial court would be well advised to dispose of the suit on merits most expeditiously. 3. With the above observations, this civil revision application is rejected. mrl ( S K Katriar, J. )