1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10828 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.7355 OF 2008 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Mr. P.S. Agrawal Advocate for Applicant. CORAM: K.K. TATED, J. DATE : 15TH OCTOBER, 2009. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant. Though the Respondents are served, no one appeared on their behalf when the matter called out. By this Application, the Applicant is seeking extension of time to deposit a sum of Rs.5000/- by way of cost in the trial Court as per order dated 22nd June, 2009 passed by this Court (Coram: B.R. Gavai, J.). Learned counsel for the Applicant states that they filed application before the trial Court on 21st July, 2009 seeking permission to deposit cost of Rs.5000/- as per order dated 22nd June, 2009 passed by this Court. The said application rejected by the trial Court by order dated 21st July, 2009 on the 2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders ground that Applicant approached the trial Court after the expiry of time granted by this Court. Learned counsel for Applicant states that Advocate has wrongly calculated the four weeks time from the date of order passed by this Court and therefore the application was filed on 21st July, 2009. The said delay was not intentional but due to miscalculation of the days. He submits that actually there is only one day's delay in depositing the cost before the trial Court. 2. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, time extended till 4th November, 2009, for depositing the cost of Rs.5000/- in the trial Court as per order dated 22nd June, 2009 in Writ Petition No. 7355 of 2008. With these directions, Civil Application is disposed of. [K.K. TATED, J.] asb/OCT09/ca10828.09