c^- iz?z9-— •yi;S^^; ,fc RESPONDENTS: N THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (»1 No. HZ&'^- Of2010 ^-^ ^f PETITIONER : Kamal Prasad S/o. Shri Seetal Das, aged about 45 years, R/o. Village Mangala, Tahsil & Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretaiy, Department of Khadi Gram Udyog DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) Deputy Director, Khadi Tatha Gram Udyod Board, New Shanti Nagar, Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3. Manager, Chhattisgarh Khadi Tatha Gram Udyod Board, office of the District Panchayat BUaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE-226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ,, ^ ^•^ ^s^ ^••/^ -e.'. ^A- '±"^<cS^& P\ i^ M/^ ^x^^f^-y ~s'^s-fS^C—J8 ^ sn^i^iil^^; ^sn sii^i wiN? fraffeeit '3~S[ "4|411d-'), 'S^FTS, r°«iwy,< ..^..^^2.^ sn^T '75RT (yifj^iitT) 'TOnw^fet3H^!i <*t<lfd<fl-1 iniRlf'? 'fs'zt <rn<$i< ^aifwan^T SBs Hoa'Me Sln-l MvwSmStStWobsnSbflvasita'sa^J. 11.8.2010 Shri S.K. Dadscna, coutisel for thc petitfoaer. Shri Viaod Tekani, Paa^l Lawyer for the State, oa advance copy. Heard on admission. This petition tvas bce^i accoiiat of non-nnplciacntatii^n Labour Court on 12.1.1999, petitfoner was declared invali4 Leamed counsel for tht was passed, the same was cti|al by flliag a Writ Petittoa No.i Court vidc order dated 31st Mt award is not beiag implementtd impteincntation of awaid, the| filed by the petitioaer aggrieved oa of award passed ia his favour by ttie •^hereby the tenmnatkm of services of fhe aiid reinstatement was oxdcred. ^ petitioner subaute that after the award •ti|aUenged by lespoDdent before this Court SpQO/1999, whlch was dismisscd by ttus ^rch, 2006. Howevcr, evcn fhCTeafter, tbs tf tfae grievaacc of ijhie petitioner is oa aceowat of aoa- pctitioner iiiay, if so advised, appax>ach fhe Labour Court for imptem^ntation of award by iavokmg provfeioas contained in Industrial Dispu^sAct, 1947. Wifh the aforesaid liber1|y. tfate petitfon is finalty disposed off. Sd/- I Manindra Mohan Shrivastava| Judge 4v\ ^*