-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPLICATION NO.3131 OF 2007 IN APPEAL NO. OF 2007 The State of Maharashtra ..Applicant Vs. Waman Tandel Chavan ..Respondent .... Mr.A.R.Patil APP for applicant Mr.M.S.Mohite Advocate for respondent .... CORAM: S.B.MHASE AND CORAM: S.B.MHASE AND CORAM: S.B.MHASE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 11, 2007 DATE : DECEMBER 11, 2007 DATE : DECEMBER 11, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. Accused no.1 was convicted and accused no.2 was acquitted. This is an appeal against acquittal of the accused no.2. We have scrutinized the judgment. We find that the view taken in respect of accused no.2 by the Sessions Judge who tried the case, is a very plausible and reasonable view. No interference is called for. 3. Leave rejected. -2- [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [ S.B.MHASE, J.]