IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2262 of 2010 1. NIRMALA DEVI W/O BANBARI SINGH VILL JALALPUR,P.S.MARANCHI,P.O.BARAHIYA,DISTT-PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT BIHAR,NEW SECRETARIAT,PATNA 2. THE MEMBER ,DISTRICT TEACHER EMPLOYMENT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER PATNA 4. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION PATNA 5. BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER MOKAMA,PATNA 6. MUKHIYA PANCHAYAT RAJ NAURANGA JALALPUR BLOCK MOKAMA,DISTT-PATNA 7. PANCHAYAT SECRETARY NAURANGA JALALPUR PANCHAYAT BLOCK MOKAMA,DISTT-PATNA 8. HEADMASTER RAJKIYA MADHYA VIDYALAYA JALALPUR MOKAMA ,DISTT-PATNA 9. BHARATI DEVI W/O VIJAY KUMAR SINGH PRESENTLY TEACHING RAJKIYA MADHYA VIDYALAYA,JALALPUR ,MOKAMA ,DISTT- PATNA ----------- 2 27.4.2010 Heard Counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the State. Interlocutory application No. 3278 of 2010 has been filed by the petitioner for staying the operation of order dated 4.12.2009 passed by the District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal, Patna in case No. 1149 of 2009, whereby a direction has been issued to restrain the petitioner from attending classes in Middle School Jalalpur, Mokama, holding that petitioner was never selected as Shikshamitra and posted in Jalalpur Panchayat, Mokama. 2 Counsel for the petitioner submits that finding has been recorded without considering the relevant facts. Though, petitioner claim to have been selected for the post of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra in the year 2005, but admittedly,till date not a single farthing has been paid to her as honorarium/salary. It is unbelievable that a person, legally appointed in the year 2005, will not be paid her honorarium/salary, even though continuously discharging duty for five years. The impugned order passed by the Tribunal indicates that petitioner managed to get issued a forged appointment letter in her favour and on that basis, she started claiming to be a genuinely appointed Shikshmitra. Considering the finding recorded by the Tribunal, I do not find any merit in the writ application and the interlocutory application. Both the petitions are dismissed. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.kumar