IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 20756 of 2010 Date of Decision: 22.11.2010. M/s Chandgi Ram Bhagwan Dass & another --Petitioners Versus State of Haryana & others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Sanjeev Kodan, Advocate for the petitioners. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. R.D. Sharma, D.A.G., Haryana and Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate present in the Court have been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents no.1 and 2 to 4 respectively. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. The petitioners claim to be licensee under the Punjab Agricultural Produce Marketing Agents carrying business at Gohana Mandi. The Market Committee formulated a scheme for establishing a new grain market. Under the scheme plots were to be allotted to the allottees on fixed price. The grievance of the petitioners is that their claim for allotment of plots on fixed price basis has not been considered by the respondents. Petitioners made representation (Annexure P-6) followed by reminder (Annexure P-7) but no decision has been taken thereon till date. CWP. No. 20756 of 2010 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be satisfied, if, respondents are directed to take decision on the representation made by the petitioner, referred to above. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to take decision on the representation made by the petitioners, within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said authority. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioners is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 22.11.2010. lucky