IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 4421 of 2010. Decided on: 28.10.2010. __________________________________________________ Nitya Dev … Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & another. … Respondents ___________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Subhash Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. ___________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral). The writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- “That a writ in the nature of mandamus may be issued directing respondent to regularize the services of the petitioner w.e.f. 1.4.2009 instead of 22.12.2009, with all consequential benefits.” 2. According to the petitioner, as per policy, on completion of eight years of service regularization is done, whereas, in the case of the petitioner the regularization has been done after eight years and eight months. It is submitted that there are several such cases where after completion of eight years of service regularization has been granted. The petitioner may point out any such two instances before the second respondent by filing a representation within a month in which case the second 2 respondent may consider the stand taken by the petitioner and shall decide the representation within another three months. 3. With these observations, writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice. (Justice V.K. Sharma) Judge. October 28, 2010. (cr/virender)