Versus HtGtfCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petitfon (S) No. 1944 of2008 Petitioner Smt. Leela Bai. W/o Shri Jyotish Kumar, Age about 39 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary School. Charghat. Block- Bemetara, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary, Education & Tribal Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur, 2. District Education Officer, Bemefara. Distt.- Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETtTOIN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTtTUTION OF INDIA Single Bench : Hon'bte Mr. Satish K.Agnihotri, J. Respondents 1, Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petttioner. Shri U. N. S. Deo, Govt. Advocate for the respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on this 1st day ^ April, 2008) Leamed counsd appearing for the petitioner submtts that the petitioner has obtained D.Ed. examination certificate.at her own expenses. on 1.12.1997. while in service. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as teamed counsel appearing for the respondents/State jointly submit that the facts and question of law, invoived in the present writ petition. are the same asto that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Munteipal Corporation, Durg and another (2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96), which has been disposed of vide order dated 3.4.2006 and the order dated 7.2.2007, passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No. 697 of 2007 (A. N. V. Satyanarayan & othere Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others). _^^^-_—— - 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of ttie order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj (supra) and WP.(S) No. 697 of 2007 (supra), subject to verification of the fact asto whether the petttloner has acquired B.Ed./D.Ed./B.T.I./M.Ed. Examination CertifScate on her own expenses. as per the circulars dated 13.9.1974, 24.12.1998, and 1.3.1999 and further whether she has been paid two advance increments or not No order asto coste. —_ _ _-— Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Thakur