IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 735 OF 2005 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 735 OF 2005 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 735 OF 2005 IN IN IN SUIT NO. 1689 OF 1978 SUIT NO. 1689 OF 1978 SUIT NO. 1689 OF 1978 M/s. Liberty Oil Mills ... Plaintiffs V/s The State of Maharashtra ... Defendants And M/s. Liberty Oil Mills Ltd. ... Applicants Ms. K. Bilani i/by Ms. Eventa A. Gonsalves for the plaintiffs. Mr. Denzil D’Mello for the defendants. CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. DATED: 8TH DEC., 2005 DATED: 8TH DEC., 2005 DATED: 8TH DEC., 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C.: 1. Heard both sides. 2. This is a chamber summons to implead M/s. Liberty Oil Mills Limited, a Public Limited Company, as a party, which was earlier a partnership firm. The only objection raised on behalf of the defendants is that of delay in moving the chamber summons. However, taking into account the fact that the entire the technical 2 format of the suit would be depending upon the involvement of the proposed plaintiff in that capacity, I am inclined to allow the chambers summons in the interest of justice. 3. Hence, the chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) & (b) . Amendment to be carried out within two weeks and the matter to be placed on board by filing of affidavit of evidence and documents alongwith the compilation on record. S.O. after two weeks. .....