IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.26 OF 2007 M/s. B.D. Shah & Co. ... Applicant Versus Union of India ... Respondent Mr. U.S. Samudrala for the applicant. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the respondent. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. DATED : 27TH NOVEMBER, 2009 P.C. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the claims filed by the applicant being in excess of 20% of the contract value, there would be no arbitration clause. He further states that the arbitration clause was invoked. Thus, the respondent will not take objection of limitation if fresh notice is given by the applicant for constituting the Arbitral Tribunal in accordance with the Arbitration clause and restricting his claim to 20% of the contract value. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant, thus, does not press this application. 2. Application is disposed of. No order as to costs. Respondent will abide by their statement. Fresh notice may be served upon them within one week from today. CHIEF JUSTICE