1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION F. NO.1580/2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.92/2011 Shri Vinod s/o Shalikaram Nitnaware and another ...Versus... State Bank of India and others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. [Shri P.S. Sadavarte, Adv. for appellants] [Shri Deepak Gupta, Adv. for respdt. No.1] CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 30.06.2011. Heard at length. Perusal of Exh.62 and 63 the statements proved by the Bank before the trial Court have not been put to challenge in the cross-examination qua the contention that the appellants deposited Rs.3,50,000/- in all was not given credit in those documents (Exh.62 and 63). The cross-examination of the witness of the Bank does not reflect that the said case was put to him in order to find out the truth, in the absence of which, it is not possible to prima facie find what Advocate Shri Sadavarte has contended in favour of his clients. In view of this, civil application is rejected, as it is a money decree. No order as to costs. JUDGE ssw