WP(C) 6885/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. MU Mondal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. UK Goswami, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department appearing for the res pondent Nos.1 to 4. I have also heard Mr. G. Goswami, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.5 and 6 and the learned State Counsel appearing for the respondent No.7. As agreed to by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, t he writ petition is taken up for disposal at the motion stage itself. The petitioner, by the present petition, has prayed for a direct ion to the respondent authorities to consider its cases for grant of financial a ssistance in terms of the Scheme formulated by the Government of Assam. Accordi ng to the petitioner, on the earlier occasion, the petitioner’s case was not con sidered for which he has the apprehension that in this financial year also his c ase may not be considered, though he is entitled to such financial assistance. It is not in dispute that the Government of Assam has formulated the Scheme for grant of financial assistance to the deserving schools on the ba sis of need-cum-seniority. If the petitioner applies for grant of such financia l assistance and he come within the zone of consideration and also fulfill the r equirement stipulated in the Scheme formulated by the Government of Assam, his c ases shall definitely be considered by the respondent authorities for providing the financial assistance for the year 2010-2011. Such consideration is to be ma de only in the event that his name is forwarded by the authority concerned. Whi le doing so, the respondent authorities shall also bear in mind the decision of this Court in Kanaklata Girls’ ME School & Ors. -Vs- State of Assam & Ors. repor ted in 2007 (3) GLT 333. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No cost.