IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5868 of 2010 MAHENDRA RAI, son of late Shiv Narain Rai, resident of Pokhara, P.S.Town Hajipur, District Vaishali--petitioner Versus 1.THE NAGAR PARISHAD,HAJIPUR through its Chairman 2.The Chairman, Nagar Parishad, Hajipur 3.The Nagar Parishad, Hajipur through its Executive Officer 4.The Executive Officer, Nagar parishad,Hajipur-respondents ----------- For the petitioner :Mr.N.K.Agrawal,Sr.Advocate For the respondents :Mr.Ajay Kumar Jain,Advocate ---- 5. 20.5.2010 Heard learned Sr.counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Hajipur Municipal authorities. After the exchange of pleadings and material the present case is not of the kind where a direction can be issued for payment of the bills being claimed by the petitioner. There are many controversies around the claim of the petitioner and some statutory body of the Municipal authorities have also applied themselves and raised objection to the work done or the amount payable which is based on audit objections and report. In view of the above, Article 226 of the Constitution is not the remedy for the petitioner. He has to avail of alternative dispute mechanism including common law remedies instead of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226. The writ petition is dismissed with the liberty as above. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.) Spal/