MC 1554/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY It is submitted by the learned counsels appearing for the parties that pleadings in this case are complete. Mr. R K Bora, learned Govt. Advocate further submits that the interim order date d 1.8.2008 was passed by this Court under the mistaken impression that counter a ffidavit on behalf of the Government was not filed by that date. Mr. Bora however points out that a counter affidavit sworn on 30.6.2008 by the R ange Officer, a copy of which was served on the learned counsel for the writ pet itioner on 1.7.2008, was filed in the case on 16.7.2008 and therefore the record ing made by the learned court on 1.8.2008 that, counter affidavit was not filed, is an incorrect recording of the facts. Accordingly, Mr. Bora submits that ther e was no justification by passing the interim order dated 1.8.2008 and the same be recalled. Mr. J I Borbhuiya, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners on the other ha nd submits that although it is claimed that the concerned land is reserved fores t land, the lands claimed by the writ petitioners are their patta land and neces sary documents in this regard is available with the petitioners. In view of this controversy, I am of the considered opinion that instead of enti rely recalling the interim order dated 1.8.2008 at this stage, status quo as on today should be ordered to be maintained by both the parties. It is ordered acco rdingly. As the pleadings have been exchanged in the main case, the writ petition is orde red to be posted for final hearing in the first week of August 2009. The Misc. Case stands disposed of accordingly.