IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18185 of 2009 SURESH PRASAD SINGH Versus THE PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION with CWJC No.18186 of 2009 NAGWA DEVI Versus THE PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION with CWJC No.18187 of 2009 NEELAM KUMARI Versus THE PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ----------- 2. 22. 12. 2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Respondent-Corporation. The grievances of the petitioners are with regard to payment of their retiral dues as indicated in paragraph 1 of the writ applications. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent-Corporation submits that in case petitioners file their representations separately, grievances of the petitioners as highlighted in the writ petitions shall be considered as per law without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for expeditious disposal of their grievances, petitioners propose to file their separate representations before Respondent No.2. In case, such representations are filed along with relevant documents in support of their claims as also certified copy of the present order within a period of eight weeks from 2 today, Respondent No.2 shall consider and dispose of their grievances in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representations, so that the grievances as raised in their representations could be settled at the earliest and admitted dues could also be paid to the petitioners without delay with statutory interest. With the above observations/directions, the writ applications stands disposed of. m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)