IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Revn. No. 2506 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION : 08.12.2006 Devender and another .... PETITIONERS Versus State of Haryana and another ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate, for the petitioners. * * * The petitioners have filed this revision petition against the order dated 7.10.2006, passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad, whereby charge under Sections 148, 323, 324, 307 and 506 read with Section 149 IPC has been framed against them. Counsel for the petitioners contends that charge under Section 307 IPC has been framed on the basis of the opinion obtained from the Doctor of a private hospital, namely B.K. Hospital, vide which injury on the person of injured Sunil was declared dangerous to life. Counsel further contends that the said opinion was obtained after a month of the alleged occurrence. After hearing counsel for the petitioners, in my opinion, on the ground that the opinion belongs to a private hospital and it was obtained after one month of the occurrence, charge cannot be set aside. Dismissed. December 08, 2006 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE