CWP No.21903 of 2010.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.21903 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.12.2010 **** Jaspal Singh & Ors. . . . . Petitioners VS. Registrar of Firms & Societies Punjab & Anr. . . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. MS Kang, Advocate for the petitioners ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Mr. HS Brar, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Having regard to the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no necessity to call upon the respondents to file the counter reply/affidavit at this stage. CWP No.21903 of 2010.doc - 2 – (2). The petitioners seek quashing of the impugned orders dated 24.11.2010 & 25.11.2010 (Annexure P8 & P10, respectively) and direction to the respondents to permit them to cast their votes in the election of respondent No.2 which is scheduled to be held in a day or so. (3). Having heard learned counsel for the parties, the impugned order dated 24th November 2010 qua the petitioners is set aside on the solitary ground that no reason whatsoever has been assigned for declaring the petitioners ineligible to cast their vote. (4). The first respondent, who is present in Court, undertakes to pass a fresh speaking order within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (5). It is, however, directed that meanwhile, the election may be held as per the notified schedule but subject to the final outcome of the legal proceedings. (6). Disposed of accordingly. Dasti. 13.12.2010 vishal shonkar (SURYA KANT) JUDGE