V HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR Writ Petition (Art. 227) No.7502 of 2011 PETlTlONERS: 1. Smt. Khalida Aafaaq W/o Shri Mohammad Aasfaq aged about 60 years Rlo Green Park Colony Jarhabhata Bilaspur Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. Mohammad Aarif S/o Late Mohammad Aasfaq aged about 41 years R/o Vyapar Vihar Road Bilaspur Distt. Bilaspur (C.G. 3. Mohammad Taarik S/o Late Mohammad Aasfaq aged abo_ut 33 years R/o Green Park Colony Jarhabhata Bilaspur Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) s RESPONDENTS: 1. Smt. E. Kasturi Rao W/o Shri Late Ashok Rao aged about 65 years R/o Narmada Nagar Mangla Naka Chowk Bilaspur Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. Smt. A. VinitavPrasad W/o A. Venu Prasad 3. Smt. P. Nandita W/o P. Harish 4. Smt. K. Ranjita W/o K. Eanindranath Respondent No.2 to 4 Through Smt. E. VKasturi Rao aged about 65 years R/o Narmada Nagar Mangla Naka Chowk Bilaspur Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited Chief Regional Manager Ofnce Madina Manzil Jail Road Raipur Tahsil District Sarguja (C.G.) 6. State of Chhattisgarh' Through Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus Q. {Writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India} Present: Mr. Atul Pandey, counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Akhil Agrawal, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No.6, on advance copy. Sinqle Bench: Hon’ble Mr. T.P. Sharma, J Soma ORDER (1 5-1 2-201 1) . By this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for expeditious trial of Civil Suit No.21-A/2011 pending before the Court of District Judge, Bilaspur. . i have heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the petition and copies of other documents. . Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners herein have filed civil suit on 21—6-2011 and have prayed for grant of temporary injunction, but the Court below has not decided the application for grant of temporary injunction till today. Therefore, the Court below be directed to decide the application for grant of temporary injunction as early as possible. . Considering the nature of suit and date of filing of suit, i do not nnd any ground for grant of such direction. Inter alia, it is the duty of all courts to expedite the trial and decide the claim including the claim of interim relief, as early as possible. With this observation, the petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. . Consequently, l.A.No.1 also stands disposed of. e Sdl- TA). shat“ Judge ("x M