1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 02.12.2011 Coram THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA Writ Petition (MD)No.13801 of 2011 M.A.Udhuman Mohideen . . . Petitioner -Vs- 1.State of Tamil Nadu, rep. By its Secretary to Government, Co-operation Food and Consumer Protection, Department, Fort St-George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Registrar of Co-operative Societies, No.170, Periyar E.V.R.Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010. 3.The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Thiruvannamalai Region, Tiruvannamali. . . . Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of mandamus to direct the 1st respondent to sanction and pay the service benefits due to the petitioner as claimed in his representation dated 16.09.2011 within a stipulated time. For petitioner :Mr.A.Sivaji For respondents :Mr.B.Pugalendhi Special Govt.Pleader ORDER The petitioner M.A.Udhuman Mohideen, who was allowed to retire by an order dated 31.12.1999 in G.O.(D).No.322 Co-operative Food and Consumer Protection Department, pending enquiry of a charge memo dated 23.03.1992, has come to this Court seeking a peculiar prayer to issue a writ of mandamus against the first respondent, Secretary to Government, Co-operation Food and Consumer Protection Department, Fort St.George, Chennai to sanction and pay the service benefits due to him as claimed in his representation dated 16.09.2011. 2.In the representation, dated 16.09.2011, the petitioner has made a prayer to regularise his 147 days of service and also to pay monetary benefits for the period of 59 days on account of compulsory transfer and again for the period of 95 days on account of the regional transfer, i.e prior to the one year period of transfer. 3.Nowhere, in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the petitioner has mentioned during which period, these 147 days lie. Further in respect of monetary benefits sought for 59 days also, he has not mentioned, what is the relevant period. Very vague averments, mentioned in the affidavit without any clarity itself would disentitle the prayer. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4.Since the petitioner was allowed to retire by an order dated 31.12.1999, as he has not claimed any of these facts when he was in service and in view of the inordinate delay in claiming the above mentioned benefits, this Court is not inclined to entertain this writ petition. 5.In view of the above, this writ petition fails and accordingly, the same is dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (Accounts) /True copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1.The Secretary to Government, Co-operation Food and Consumer Protection, Department, Fort St-George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Registrar of Co-operative Societies, No.170, Periyar E.V.R.Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010. 3.The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Thiruvannamalai Region, Tiruvannamali. +1CC TO MR.A.SIVAJI, ADVOCATE SR.42615 +1CC TO THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SR.42685 Vs SR : 16.12.2011 : 2p/6c W.P.(md).NO.13801 of 2011 02.12.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/