CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.20572 OF 2010 :{ 1 }: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISION: NOVEMBER 18, 2010 Shri Vaishno Devi Siksha Samiti, Mohindergarh and another .....Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. Vivek Khatri, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner-Educational Institutions appear to have made the present approach with a strange prayer. The petitioners pray for issuance of mandamus to respondent Nos.1 to 3 for permitting them to fill up the vacant seats of C.P.E.D Courses on their own in the Colleges run by the petitioner-Societies. The petitioners have further prayed for direction from this Court, allowing them to fill up the seats lying vacant in the said course in the Colleges run by the respective Societies either by their own methods or as per the method considered fit by this Court. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.20572 OF 2010 :{ 2 }: It is not understood as to how the Court can grant permission to the Societies like the petitioners to admit the students on their own. If any law is the basis, then such direction need not be sought from the Court. It seems that the petitioners are wanting to advance this as a base for doing something, which may not be legally permissible. How the Court will have any roll to issue any such direction is really not understood. No case for issuing any direction, as prayed for, therefore, is made out. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed in limine. November 18, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE