FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2594 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3524 OF 1995 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ According to the petitioner, the fact that the petitioner was resident of Degloor would make no difference to his claim of belonging to reserve category, as admittedly, Mahadeo Koli was notified as Scheduled Tribe for the entire State of Maharashtra and Degloor is part of State of Maharashtra. It is further contended that the regime provided in the decision of the Supreme court in the case of Madhuri Patil, was not available when the caste claim of the petitioner was decided. The petitioner would be entitled to avail of the said remedy in the light of the exposition in Madhuri Patil's case. Both these grounds were available to the petitioner and could have been raised when writ petition was heard by the earlier Bench. We are in agreement with the arguments of the respondents that such ground cannot be the basis to entertain the review petition, as expounded by the Apex court in the case of Ajit Kumar Rath Vs. State of Orissa and Ors., AIR 2000 SC 85. Accordingly, we hold that no ground for review is made out. Review petition is dismissed. (S. S. SHINDE. J.) (A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.) Date:08.02.2010. rlj/