f '5 C ‘ BEFORE THE wgL-LCOURT OF CHATTISGARH, AT B!LASPUR, mg 2w W.P.NO ...../’ 2&01' Smt. Nirmala Singh W/o. Shri L J Singh Aged 53 years .{C ‘ 1 / Additional District Judge te the District Judge, Raipur, R/c. New Shanti Nagar Raipur. Chattisgarh. VERSUS PETITIONER K5, 1.State of Chattisgarh ‘ Through Secretary Law D K Bhawan Raipur. § % 2Registrar Genera! High Court of MP. JABALPUR. K5 3.Registrar High Court of General Chattisgarh Bilaspur 9 ,(4. Smt. Shakuntaia Das District Judge Raigarh. 6 5. S .ri Chandra Bhushan Singh Pate! A.D.J.Consumer Forum Ambikapur g 6, Shri Dinkar Kaehinath Damie A.D.J., SPzciari Judg V Db RC1. 7. Shri Tankeshwar Prasad Sharma ADJ. BAKUNTHPUR SARGUJA R 8. Shri Ranganath Chandr’akar, A.D.J Special Judge (ST/$C) SARGUJA AMBIKAPUR g 9. Shri Rajendra Lal Jhnawar ADJ. Consumer Forum Bilaspur § 10.3hriTaranchancl Yadu ADJ (Law Department) Raipur. 9 11. Shri Raghuvir Singh A D J Special Judge (SC/ST) '7 RAIPUR. 9 12.8hri Lakhanlal Jogvanshi A.D.J BALAOD z 133‘Shri Hira Singh Markam A.D.J.CONSUMER FORM DURG g 14. Shri Sanman Singh A D J Consumer Forum Raipur. , 15. Shri Hiraram Gurupanch \ADJ (Law Department) RAIPUR. $ gt. 5 Shri Tarenqra Kumar Jha A.D.J., Registrar General High Court, Bilaspur 9 17. Shri DiHp Kuma! Bhatt A.D.J., ST/SC.SP, JUDGE BILASPUR 9 18.Shri Gulam Minhhajuddin A.D.J. Consumer Forum ’QAJNaNBanoN. @Kia A.D.J Shri Radheshyam Sharma Special Judge (ST/SC) BASTAR g 20. Shri lnder Singh Uboweja ADJ (Law Department) RAIPUR g K21. Shri Sandeep Buxi A.D.J. Add. Registrar High Court, BILASPUR § 22. Smt. Maiteryi Mathur A.D.J. RAJNANDGAON. 9 23. Shri Pradeep Kumar Shrivastav A.D.J. Bilaspur 24. Shri Ambrish Kumar Patel ADJ. RAJNANDGAON RESPONDENTS. PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUE OF WRIT OF MANDAMAU3. CERTIORARY OR ORDER OF DIRECTION OF LIKE NATURE. XI-HC~22 CD g? ; H2mmam£§ w@3%Wmmg hyp‘r&c‘?3y?]?4wi Wtrm mm W 1200 W . . ., Wm WW mam 1%? WW§WW %a wa&m 15.6.2005 PETitioner by Shri Kaniik Tiwari, Sr. Advocate with Shri Anand Kumar Tiwari, Advocate. I,A.No. 4805/ 2005. This is an applicati n, suppmted by aEldavit, for withdrawal of the wn't p€titioin No. 1358/ 2001. 3 ‘ M1". Kanak Tiwari, le‘ ad counsel for the pe1jtioner states that the petitioner h s filed a representation before the High Court for redressal of her grievances and the same is likely to be considered b_ the High Court, hence at this the does want to the He stage petitioner no press petition. He prayed that this petition b dismissed with liberty to file again in case the petitioner s not granted relief by the High Court on the administrative ide. The I.A.No. 4805/200 is allowed. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn Wi ithe aforesaid liberty. / .Lm‘__ J. “l l Sdl— i ,‘l ‘ Satish K.1Agnihotri Judge l l N i (eaten