HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.25208 of 2010 Date: 1-11-2011 Between: D. Nageshwara Rao s/o.Suryanarayana .. Petitioner And The Joint Collector & Chairman, Selection Committee (For Backward Classes), Visakhapatnam and another .. Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Smt. N (P) Anjana Devi Counsel for respondents : Assistant Government Pleader for Social Welfare The Court made the following: ORDER: The petitioner, an Advocate enrolled in the year 2007, was selected for undergoing training in Administration of Justice, for a period of three years, in terms of G.O.Ms.No.160, Social Welfare (BUD.1) Department, dated 27-7-1991, and was attached to the office of the Government Pleader, Visakhapatnam, vide proceedings in Rc.No.A4/88/2008/BCW, dated 6-9-2008 of respondent No.1. Under the said proceeding, respondent No.1 has stated that the trainee Advocates will be paid stipend of Rs.500/- per month for a period of three years, subject to the condition of their having 90% attendance in the training and submitting attendance certificate from the concerned Law Officer, a one time allowance of Rs.3000/- for books and furniture, besides reimbursement of enrolment fee of Rs.585/-. According to the petitioner, the stipend and the one time allowance were revised from Rs.500/- to Rs.1000/- and Rs.3000/- to Rs.6000/-, respectively, under G.O.Ms.No.109, dated 10-6-2008. It is the case of the petitioner that while the original one time allowance of Rs.3000/- was paid to him, he was not paid any amount towards stipend, original or revised, and also the enhanced one time allowance of Rs.3000/-. The petitioner is stated to have made a representation on 10-7-2009 to respondent No.1 in this regard, but there was no response from him. Therefore, he has filed the present Writ Petition. No counter-affidavit is filed on behalf of the respondents. From the facts discussed above, it is evident that the petitioner is entitled to the payment of stipend and one time allowance, as subsequently revised, subject to his producing the attendance certificate from the concerned Law Officer. Therefore, the petitioner is permitted to approach respondent No.1 with a representation while enclosing the attendance certificate for payment of the amounts due to him. Within one month of receipt of such representation, respondent No.1 shall consider and dispose of the same and communicate the decision thereon to the petitioner. Subject to the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel, WPMP No.32213/2010 is disposed of as infructuous. ________________________ Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy Date : 1-11-2011 Note : Furnish copy in a week. AM