- 1 - - 1 - - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. WRIT PETITION NO.1163 OF 1994 Laxmanrao Hiruji Gajare .. i Gajare .. i Gajare .. Petitioner. Verus. Verus. Verus. The State of Maharashtra & Ors harashtra & Ors harashtra & Ors .. Respondents. Mr.Prashant Naik for the petitioner. Mr. Vishal Phal,AGP for the respondent. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1164 OF 1994 Kassam Mohd. Thakur and Ors .... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..... Respondents. Mr.Prashant Naik for the petitioner. Mr. Vishal Phal, AGP for the respondent. CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & V.M.KANADE,J V.M.KANADE,J V.M.KANADE,JJ. DATE : DATE : DATE : SEPTEMBER 27, 20 SEPTEMBER 27, 20 SEPTEMBER 27, 2005. P.C. 1. Learned advocate for the petitioner states that in view of subsequent events in the matter and consequent decision by the Apex Court, both the petitions are rendered infructuous. The petitions, accordingly, disposed of as infructuous. The rule stands discharged. There shall be no order as to cost. The interim relief, if any, stands vacated. (R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J) (R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J) (R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J) - 2 - - 2 - - 2 - (V.M.KANADE,J) (V.M.KANADE,J) (V.M.KANADE,J)