3.wp­9825­11.doc jdk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9825 OF 2011 Mr. Abdul Kadar Gafoor Kalsekar and Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. Regional Authorization Committee for the Approval of Unrelated Transplant ..Respondents Mr. Uday Warunjikar for Petitioners Mrs. M.P.Thakur AGP for Respondent No.1 Mr. S.R. Nargolkar AGP for Respondent No.2 CORAM : S.A.BOBDE AND SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J J. DATE : DECEMBER 23, 2011. P.C.: 1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties. 2. Mr. Nargolkar, the learned AGP for Respondent No.2 states that the Petitioners are entitled to approach any of the nine hospitals in Pune which deal with the petitioners' problem. As regards Respondent No.2-Hospital, Mr. Nargolkar states that if the Petitioners make an application for registration with Respondent no.2, Respondent No.2 will take a decision on the said application in accordance with the provisions of 1 3.wp­9825­11.doc the Transplantation of Human Organs Act, and communicate it to the Petitioners and Respondent No.1 immediately. Upon receiving a communication from the Respondent No.2, the Respondent No.1 shall take a decision within a period of two weeks and communicate the same to the Petitioners. 3. Rule is disposed of in above terms. [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [ S.A.BOBDE, J. ] 2