THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI C.R.P. No. 1238 of 2010 ORDER: Aggrieved against the order dated 9th March 2010 passed in IA No. 256/2010 in LGC No. 70/2007 on the file of the Special Court under A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, Hyderabad, the respondents therein filed the present civil revision petition. The revision petitioners are the respondents and the respondent herein is the petitioner before the Special Court. The above I.A was filed under Order VI Rule 17 read with Section151 CPC seeking to amend para 6 of the plaint relating to cause of action on the ground that there is a change in the cause of action by marking Ex.A5 on behalf of plaintiff. The respondent resisted the application. The court below after considering the merits of the application allowed the same. Aggrieved thereby, the respondent therein filed the present civil revision petition. Heard learned counsel for the revision petitioner and perused the order challenged in this revision. The order of the Special court shows that from the material available on record, it inferred that the wrong mention of the year in the complaint may be on account of typographical mistake and therefore it allowed the application. Further, it is to be seen that if really there is a change in the date as contended by the respondents, the same can be availed while at the time of disposal of the main suit. In view of the reasoning adduced by the Special Court, I do not find any ground to interfere with the same. This civil revision petition is dismissed at the stage of admission. ____________ 23-3-2010 kvrk THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI C.R.P.No. 1238 of 2010 23-03-2010