Efii F R?M< SSSLC yc, ^'.c C^^l cyo @x,& IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S) N0. 566; /2009 PETITIONER ^RESPONDENTS -e -: /€ ^^r ^^ "/^t'.-'-v '^n/ .••'•; ^ ^y -<t-' ^' . <lyy Mt ^ /• ^ Arvind Kumar Singh, S/o. Late Laxman Singh, Aged about 33 years, R/o. Bariyocharpara, Tahsil Rajpur, Ambikapur, District Surguja (CG) VERSUS 1] State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Seeretary, School . Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) 2] Director, Public Education, Directorate, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) 3] District Education Officer, Surajpur, District Surguja (CG) 4] Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Surguja, District Surguja (CG) 5] Secretary, Panchayat & Gramin Vikas Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur District Raipur (CG) 6] Fulmani Ekka, Lecturer, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Kalyanpur, Ambikapur, District Surguja(CG) WR1T PETITIQN^JNDER^ARnCLE 226 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1] PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER (S): As stated above in the cause title. 2] PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENT (S): - As stated above in the cause title. "^ HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BiLASPUR WR!T ;TiTiO<^ PITiTiOhsER RESPONDENTS ISiN0.43150F200S Smt. Jitender Lamba Vsrsus State or Chhattisgarh & Others W.P.jS) Nos.5981, 5448, 54SS, 5451. 5483.5484,5485.5584.578S. 57S5. 5783,580S, 5813, 5815, 5819, 5820,5S2S,SS3S,5889, 5880, 5891, S018, S034, 6204, 633S, S340, 5423, S43S, 5280, 5518, 5533, S57S, SS11, SS61, 5S91,5811,5817,5S27, S830,S621 & 6622 of 2009. (Writ Peiitions under Articie 226 of the Constitution of India) SingSe Bench : Hon'bie Shri 5atish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- At Shri H.B. Agrawa!, Sr. Adyocate with Ms Meera Jaiswa!, Shrl P.P. Sahu, Shra BAaieen Siddiquj, Shri P.R. Patankar, Shri Manoj Paranjape, Shri Uttam Pandey, Shri C.J.K. Rao, Shri Roop Nask, Shri A.S. Rajput, Shri K.S. Pswar, Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Shri R.R. Soni, Shri V.K. Pandey and Shri Ashwani Shukia, Advocates for the respective petiaoners. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, Dy. Advocate Generai for the State of Chhattisgarh and its authorities. ORDER{ORAL} (Passed on this 12th day of November, 2008) Wslh the consent of learned counsei appearing for the parties, the petitions are heard finaiiy. in this batch or matters it has been brought to the notice of the Court that the transfer orders have been passed without compiying with the pollcy snd in some cases the orders having been executed also requlre reconsideration. Shri Thakur, iearned Dy. Advocate General appearang for the Siate, on instructions, very_raif!y submits that ail the cases of the petitioners pending consideration before this Court shaii be considered afresh, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, to examine asto whether the transfer 6. orders havs been passeci in accordance with the policy and tii'i that tii-ne the petitioners herein shal! not be disturbed. in view of foregoing, according to learned counsei appearing for the respective petitioners nothing survives in teese petitions for adjudication. Accordingiy, the petitions being W.P. (S) Nos.4315, 5981, 5448, 545S,5451, 5483, 5484, 5485, 5S84, S75S, 5785,5793,5805, 5813, 5815,5819, 5320,5826,5839, 5889, 5890, 5891, S018,S094,6204, S33S,6340, S423, 6438, 52SO, 5518,5S33,5578, 5611,5SS1, 5S91, 5811, 5817, 5327, 5930, SS21 & S522 of 2009 are disposed of. However, on the basis of submission made by the learned Dy. Advocate Qeneral, it is made clear that the peiitioners hersin shaii continue on their respective places of posting, as obtains today, tiii disposai of thear respective cases, in accordance with iaw and on its own merits. No order asto costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Gowri Judge ^•£