IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24128 of 2008 1. RAMKRIPAL SAHNI 2. Janak DulariDevi 3. Ram Parikshan Sahani @Parikshan Sahni 4. Sariratan sahni @sarikhan sahni 5. Lalit sahani 6. Khusar sahni@kusar sahni Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.10.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. In this application under Section 498A of the Penal Code, others except for petitioner no. 3, who is the husband, have been granted anticipatory bail. The submission today on behalf of petitioner no. 3 is of matrimonial harmony having been restored. However, there is no affidavit on record to that effect. The application is, therefore, disposed directing the petitioner no. 3 abovenamed to surrender in the court below within a period of six weeks from today, when he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Madhubani in complaint case no. 1181 of 2007. If the complainant disputes the factum of compromise, the court below shall be at liberty to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law when its power shall not be inhibited merely because of the grant of anticipatory bail by this Court, when the submission subsequently found to be incorrect. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)