IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 1ST DECEMBER 2011 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 RP.No. 861 of 2011() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.26390/2011 Dated 16/03/2011 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- RAJI.B.S., W/O GIREESH K.G., GIRI BHAVAN, KURAMBALA, PANDALAM(HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHER (ENGLISH), DEVASWOM BOARD HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, PARUMALA). BY ADV. SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND SMT.V.AJITHA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. MALINI DEVI.S, AGED 44 YEARS, W/O.N.KRISHNAN MOOTHATHU, TEACHER (ENGLISH), DEVASWOM BOARD HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,CHERIYANADU CHENGANNOOUR TALUK,ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT,RESIDING AT KARIKKA MADOM, HARIPPAD VILLAGE, MANNARASSALA P.O. KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK, ALAPPUZHA (DISTRICT). 2. TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF DEVASWOM, OFFICE OF THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM, DEVASWOM BUILDINGS, NANDHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695003. 3. THE MANAGER (SECRETARY), TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD SCHOOLS, DEVASWOM BUILDINGS, NANDHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695003. 4. THE PRINCIPAL, DEVASWOM BOARD HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, PARUMALA, KADAPPRA VILLAGE, PARUMALA P.O., MANNAR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN 689626. 5. THE PRINCIPAL, DEVASWOM BOARD HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, CHERIYANADU, CHERIYANADU P.O., CHENGANNOOR TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN 689511. 6. THE REGIONAL,DEPUTY DIRECTOR, HIGHER SECONDARY, CORPORATION BUILDINGS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN 695001. BY ADV.SHRI G.BENO FOR R1 STANDING COUNSEL SHRI G.BIJU FOR R2 TO R5 SR.GOVT.PLEADER SHRI M.A.FAYAZ FOR R6 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN RP NO.861/11 PETITIONER'S EXTS: CERTIFIED COPY OF JUDGMENT DT.16.3.11 IN W.P.(C)No.26390/11 OF THIS COURT. TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE dsn T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------------- R.P.No.861 OF 2011 in W.P.(C)No.26390 of 2011 -------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 1st DAY OF DECEMBER, 2011 O R D E R This Review Petition is filed by the 6th respondent in the Writ Petition. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the review petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel for the Board and the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner. 3. The Writ Petition was filed by the 1st respondent herein challenging an order of transfer. This Court did not go into the merits of the matter and the only direction issued was that the Devaswom Board will consider Exhibit P6 representation after notice to both parties, namely, the review petitioner herein and the first respondent herein. 4. The learned counsel for the review petitioner submitted that the apprehension of the review petitioner is that the direction to the Board to consider the representation will be treated as a direction to reconsider it. That apprehension is R.P.No.861/11 -2- without any basis. The only direction is to consider the representation with notice to both parties. Therefore, the Review Petition is dismissed, as there is no apparent error in the judgment. Sd/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn