IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 7614 of 2010 Date of Decision: 22.11.2010 Charanjit Kaur and another .... Petitioners Versus Nachatar Kaur and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Aman Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) The only grievance of the plaintiffs-petitioners is that both the Courts below have not granted injunction in favour of the plaintiffs-petitioners restraining defendants not to alienate plaintiffs share during the pendency of the suit. The settled principle of law is that any alienation made during the pendency of the suit would be hit by principle of lis pendence irrespective of the fact that injunction application has been rejected. In view of this settled principle of law, no further order is required. Petition is dismissed. (ALOK SINGH) 22.11.2010 JUDGE reena