IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-20262 of 2008 Date of Decision: November 20, 2009 Dinesh Kumar and others …. Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another. ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present: Mr. Parampal Singh, Advocate, for Mr. Vinod S. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Pattar, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. S.S. Khurana, Advocate, for respondent No.1. S.D. Anand, J. Case FIR No. 51 dated 03.03.2005, Police Station Rewari, was an outcome of a matrimonial feud between petitioner No.1 – Dinesh Kumar and respondent no.2 – Usha, the other petitioners being parents, sister and brother of petitioner no.1 – Dinesh Kumar. The parties arrived at a settlement and a decree for divorce by mutual consent had already been granted by the Competent Court on 18.02.2008. As per the other terms of the documented compromise, the wife – respondent no.2 had to concede the quashment of the FIR. In view of the fact that she refrained in conceding quashment before this Court, this petition had to be filed. The learned counsel, appearing on behalf of respondent No.2, Crl. Misc. No. 20262 of 2009 states that respondent No.2 has no objection if this petition for quashment is allowed. The petitioner shall stand allowed accordingly. FIR No. 51 dated 3.3.2005, under Sections 498-A, 406, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Rewari, and also the proceedings arising therefrom shall stand quashed. Disposed of accordingly. November 20, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 2