CRM-M No.36327 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CRM-M No.36327 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.02.2011 Surjeet and another ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Bijender Dhankar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana for the State. ... Alok Singh, J (Oral). Petitioners were arrested for an offence punishable under Sections 323/324/326/506/34 IPC pursuant to FIR No.165 dated 20.6.2010 P.S. Kunjpura, District Karnal. Petitioners were enlarged on bail by the learned Magistrate. However, during the investigation, petitioners were found to have committed an offence under Section 326 IPC, hence Section 326 IPC was added against the petitioners and petitioners were again arrested on 12.11.2010 and are languishing in jail since then. Their bail CRM-M No.36327 of 2010 2 application for the newly added section has been rejected by the Magistrate vide order dated 15.11.2010 as well as by the learned Sessions Judge vide order dated 27.11.2010. This Court in the case of Rakesh Vs. State of Haryana (CRM. No.M-1661 of 2011, decided on 14.2.2011) has ruled that if an accused is enlarged on bail for offence triable by the Magistrate and if he is found to have committed another offence during the investigation, he shall continue to enjoy the bail granted earlier after submitting fresh bail bonds and surety bonds for the newly added section and he is not required to seek fresh regular bail for the newly added section. Present petition is allowed in the light of the judgement passed by this Court in Rakesh's case (supra). Accused shall be released forthwith on furnishing fresh bonds (personal and surety) for the newly added section, to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 28.02.2011 sk.