IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8111 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO.8111 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO.8111 OF 2006 Ashok Govind Walunj )..Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. )..Respondents ---- Mr.Uday Warunjikar for the petitioner Mr.P.P.Kakade AGP for respondent no.1. ---- Coram : S.B.Mhase & Coram : S.B.Mhase & Coram : S.B.Mhase & R.S.Mohite,JJ R.S.Mohite,JJ R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 18.04.2007 PC 1. Heard. 2. Larned Counsel Mr.Warunjikar for the petitioner states that he may be allowed to withdraw the petition with liberty to follow an alternate available remedy. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with such liberty. However, we make it clear that whether the period of pendency of this petition in this Court shall be treated as a period for bonafidely prosecuting the remedy or not under the Limitation Act shall be independently considered by the concerned authority if the appeal is found to be beyond limitation by the said authority. (R.S.Mohite,J) (S.B.Mhase,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (S.B.Mhase,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (S.B.Mhase,J)