1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1987 OF 2010 1. Anusaya W/o.Waman Ghule, Age-76 years, Occu-Household, R/o.Kostgaon, Tal.Renapur, Dist. Latur, 2. Vaishnavi W/o.Ramkisan Dahiphale, Age-35 years, Occu-Service, R/o.Kostgaon, Tal.Renapur, Dist. Latur, At present, residing at Aurangabad, 3. Vaijnath S/o.Baliram Nagargoje, Age-48 years, Occu-Service, R/o.Venkatesh Nagar, Latur, 4. Priya Vaijnath Nagargoje, Age-25 years, Occu-Service, R/o.Mukhed, Dist. Nanded APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra RESPONDENT Through Police Inspector, Police Station, MIDC Latur, Tal. and Dist. Latur. Mr.S.S.Thombre, learned counsel for applicants. Mr.K.S.Patil, learned APP for State Mr.S.G.Jadhavar, learned counsel for original complainant. CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J. DATE : 11/06/2010 PER COURT : 2 1. By the present application, the applicants have approached this Court for their release on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest in connection with CR No.99/2010, registered in Latur Police Station, Dist. Latur for the offence punishable u/s. 498A, 306, 323 r/w. 34 of IPC. 2. Heard learned counsel for applicants, learned APP for State, and learned counsel for original complainant. 3. The record shows that when the application was moved during vacation on 26/05/2010, applicant no.4 was ordered to be released on bail in the event of her arrest in connection with the said offence on furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.15,000/- and on executing PR bond in the like amount. 4. Considering the submissions across the bar and on perusal of the complaint, on the basis of which an offence was registered, deceased Kavita has committed suicide in the early hours of 08/05/2010. Further it shows that the deceased was residing in the premises at Sai Road, Latur alongwith her husband and at that time, these applicants were not residing with deceased and her husband, where the incident occurred. For the offence punishable u/s. 498A, 306 of IPC, the incident which took place soon before the alleged incident, played very vital role. From the allegations in the complaint, for about 1 year prior to the incident, the deceased started residing separately alongwith her husband. From these allegations 3 in the complaint, on the face of it, it reveals that at the relevant time or soon before the incident, the deceased was not either in the custody of these applicants or residing in the company of these applicants, and if it is so, the applicants are entitled for anticipatory bail. In view of this, following is the order : O R D E R 1. Application is allowed. 2. All the applicants be released on bail in the event of their arrest in connection with CR No.99/2010, registered in Latur Police Station, on furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each and on executing PR bond in the like amount. This protection is granted till filing of the charge sheet. 3. Application stands disposed of accordingly. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/JUNE 2010/cri-appl-1987-10