IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5270 of 2010 RAMA KANT PD. CHOUDHARY S/O LATE HARINANDAN PD. CHOUDHARY R/O SOUTH OF LAW COLLEGE, GANNIPUR, MUZAFFARPUR, AT PRESENT POSTED AS ELECTRICAL EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRIC SUPPLY DIVISION, DARBHANGA Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VIDYUT BHAWAN BAILEY ROAD, PATNA, THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN 2. THE SECRETARY, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 3. THE JOINT SECRETARY (GENERAL ADMINISTRATION) BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 4. THE FINANCIAL CONTROLLER BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 5. THE ACCOUNTS OFFICER (ESTT.) BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 6. THE GENERAL MANAGER-CUM-CHIEF ENGINEER BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, MUZAFFARPUR ----------- 02. 02.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Bihar State Electricity Board(hereinafter referred to as the Board). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the disciplinary authority never passed any order that petitioner will not earn increment during suspension period yet he has been deprived of five increments during the suspension period. Highlighting such grievance petitioner has filed representation dated 27.5.2009, Annexure-6, which is addressed to the Chairman of the Board but the same has not been considered so far. 3. Let Chairman of the Board consider the representation of the petitioner dated 27.5.2009, Annedxure-6 in accordance with law, as early as possible, in any case within two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order before the Chairman. In the event, representation of the petitioner is allowed, amount becoming due to the petitioner be also paid to him within the same time. 4. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)