CR No. 7 of 2004. 23.12.2008 Present: Mr.Romesh Verma, counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Seema Guleria, counsel for the respondent. Mr. Romesh Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner- tenant states that this petition has become infructuous in view of the fact that he has been informed by his client that the petitioner- tenant has vacated the premises and handed-over the possession of the premises to the respondent-landlord. Ms. Seema Guleria, learned counsel for the respondent- landlord states that she also been instructed by his client that the possession of the said premises had been handed-over by the petitioner-tenant to the respondent-landlord. The petition is, therefore, dismissed as having become infructuous. December 23, 2008 ( Deepak Gupta ),J. s.