IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 1317 of 2008 Between: Ch. Madhu, S/o. anjaiah, Poodur, R/o. H.No. 15-45/5/A, Bhopalapatnam Road, Choppadandi Post and Mandal, Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Chairman & Managing Director, A.P.N.P.D.C. Limited, Corporate Office, Opp: REC Petrol Pump, Hanamkonda, Warangal District. 2 The Chief General Manager (ARO), A.P.N.P.D.C.L., Warangal District, Warangal. 3 The Superintendent Engineer (Operations) A.P.N.P.D.C.L, Operation Circle, Karimnagar District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of respondents in not finalizing the interview results conducted on 09-4- 2007 for the post of Contract Junior Linemen as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to finalise the interview results conducted on 09-4-2007 and appoint the petitioner on regular basis. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.BUCHI BABU Counsel for the Respondents: P.R.BALARAMI REDDY(SC FOR AP TRANSCO) The Court made the following ORDER: This writ petition is filed with a prayer to declare the action of the respondents in not finalizing the selections for which the interviews were held on 09.04.2007 for the post of Contract Junior Lineman, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Whatever may have been the justification for the petitioner in approaching this Court, the fact remains that the results of the interviews conducted for the appointment of Junior Lineman on contract basis were declared, appointment was made and even the term of appointment is nearing completion. Hence, the writ petition has become infructious. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:19.06.2008. Kdl