1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.134 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2797 OF 2005 Prathamesh Aquaculture Development Pvt.Ltd. & anr. Petitioners vs. Union of India & ors. Respondents Mr.V.N.Bodke i/b.M/s.Chitnis Vaithy & Co. for the petitioners. Mr.R.Asokan for the respondents. CORAM : R. M. LODHA & J. P. DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED : 10th April, 2006 P.C. On 31st March, 2006 we passed the following order: " Prima facie, we do not find any justifiable ground to extend the time for executing the conveyance as in the order dated 19th December, 2005, the court made it clear that on an outer side the conveyance should be executed by end of March, 2006. 2. Mr.R.Asokan, advocate prays for time to seek instructions in the light of what we have observed above. . Stand over to 10th April, 2006." 2. Mr.R.Asokan, advocate appearing for the revenue submits that in the light of the letter dated 5th April, 2006 written by the advocate for the original petitioners, the conveyance could not be executed. He placed before us the letter dated 5th April, 2006. 2 3. It appears that now the petitioners want time for execution of the conveyance as they are awaiting adjudication of the stamp duty. 4. In the peculiar circumstances, by consent, we extend time for executing deed of conveyance by four weeks from today. 5. Notice of motion stands disposed of. (R.M. (R.M. (R.M. LODHA,J.) LODHA,J.) LODHA,J.) (J.P. (J.P. (J.P. DEVADHAR,J.) DEVADHAR,J.) DEVADHAR,J.)