IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1160 of 2009 PRITHIVI CHAND CHOUDHARY,S/O LATE PHENILAL CHOUDHARY, R/O VILL. HULASH, P.S. RAGHOPUR, DIST. SUPAUL. ---- APPELLANT/PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER- CUM-SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DIRECTOR, LAND ACQUISITION AND REHABILITATION, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR,PATNA. ------ RESPONDENTS. ----------- 3 13.10.2009 Heard Mr. Amrit Abhijat for the petitioner, and Mr. Arup Kumar Chongdar, learned Assistant Counsel to Additional Advocate General No.2. This appeal under clause 10 of the Letters Patent of the High Court of Judicature at Patna has been preferred by the petitioner of Civil Review no. 42 of 2009, to set aside the order dated 22.04.2009, whereby the Civil Review application has been rejected. The review application, in its turn, had been filed for review of the order dated 01.12.2008, by which the writ petition bearing C.W.J.C.No. 1616/2007 was dismissed on merits. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. It appears that Civil Review no. 42 of 2009 has been rejected on the ground that the scope of interference is very narrow. The issue raised by the petitioner cannot be entertained within the 2 narrow confines of the Civil Review application. We entirely agree with the impugned order. It is accordingly dismissed. Sym/ ( S.K.Katriar, J.) (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)