1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.2639/2011 [Sindhu Education Society .vrs. State of Maharashtra and another] ................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................................... CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND P.D. KODE, JJ. DATE : JULY 18, 2011. Mrs. K.S. Joshi, learned AGP for the respondents states that she is still awaiting instructions from respondent no.1. Shri A.A. Naik, learned counsel for the petitioner, invites attention to representation dated 20.8.2010 at Annexure – F and states that it is still undecided. He points out that first representation in this respect has been preferred on 7.9.2009 vide Annexure – C. According to him, as the petitioner is not seeking any operative direction as such, the matter can be disposed of by asking the respondent no.1 to consider that representation within stipulated time. In view of rival contentions, we find that if 2 the representation of the petitioner is not already decided, the same needs to be decided. Hence, we direct respondent no.1 to take appropriate decision on the same as early as possible and in any case within a period of four weeks from today on communication of this order to it. Respondent no.1 is free to hear the petitioner if it finds the same necessary. With these directions, writ petition is disposed of. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE Gulande