CWP no. 1194 of 2011(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP no. 1194 of 2011(O&M) Decided on : 16-05-2011 Gulab Kaur ....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Mr. S.N.Pilliana, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Sunil Nehra, Sr. DAG, Haryana MAHESH GROVER, J The grievance of the petitioner was that the benefit of second ACP should have been granted to her w.e.f 2007 as has been initially done by virtue of Annexure P-1 and not from 2009 which has been done by the respondents now. Notice of motion having been issued, respondents have filed their reply to say that the petitioner was appointed on regular basis in August, 1989 and therefore when she completed 20 years in 2009, the benefit was granted to her. It has further been stated that the earlier order was passed inadvertently and the mistake having been rectified, the benefit was granted to the petitioner w.e.f. 2009 as per the rules. The stand has not been controverted by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of this when concededly petitioner has jointed regular CWP no. 1194 of 2011(O&M) 2 service in 1989, the benefit of ACP has been rightly granted to the petitioner after completion of 20 years service in 2009. Hence, there is no fault in the approach of the respondents. Therefore, the instant petition is held to be without any merit and the same is hereby dismissed. May 16 , 2011 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge