IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 23RD MAY 2008 / 2ND JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 14282 of 2008(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ VIJESH.S, S/O.SUKUMARAN NAIR, GEETHA MANDIRAM, VALATHINGAL P.O, KOLLAM-5691 018. BY ADV. SRI.G.BHAGAVAT SINGH RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY SECRETARY TO HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DISTRICT OFFICER, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, DISTRICT OFFICE, KOLLAM. 4. THE COMMANDANT, KERALA ARMED POLICE III BATTALION, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA. BY SC SRI.ALEXANDER THOMAS GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.T.B. REMANI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C). 14282/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of May, 2008 JUDGMENT The issue raised in this case is covered by the judgment of this Court in Writ Petition No.26549/2007 and Connected Cases. In the result, it is declared that the directions issued in the said judgment are applicable in the case of the petitioner herein as well. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass orders as regards the suitability of the petitioner in terms of Rule 10(b)(3) of Part II of K.S. & S.S.R for the appointment in question, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. In the meanwhile, taking note of the fact that the training has commenced on 5.5.2008, there will be a direction to the fourth respondent to depute the petitioner for training on a provisional basis, subject to the decision to be taken by the Government as aforementioned. It is made clear that if ultimately the Government finds the petitioner unsuitable after completion of the exercise, in terms of the W.P.(C).14282/2008 2 directions contained in the common judgment dated 14.3.2008 in Writ Petition No.26549/2007 and connected cases, then the mere participation of the petitioner in the training by itself shall not confer any right on the petitioner. Writ petition is disposed of as above. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs W.P.(C).14282/2008 3