HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.7268 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner is a Dealer of the respondent herein in Petroleum products and an outlet is being run at Tadikelapudi Village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, West Godavari District. The officials of the respondent have conducted the inspection on 22-04-2010. Samples were drawn from the Nozzles and on finding that the sample did not accord with specifications, a show cause notice was issued on 07-06- 2010 requiring the petitioner to explain as to why dealership be not cancelled. The petitioner submitted a reply, dated 18-06-2010, requesting the respondent to send the sample left with it, for analysis to the same laboratory. The request was acceded to and the sample was sent for analysis. The analysis disclosed that the sample that was left with the petitioner accorded with the specifications whereas the one take by the respondent, failed. On this basis, show cause notice, dated 04-03-2011, is issued. The same is challenged in this writ petition. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent. 3. It is only in rare and exceptional cases that this Court would entertain the writ petition against a showcase notice, that too, where it was issued by an authority not vested with the jurisdiction. The petitioner does not contend that the respondent does not have the jurisdiction to issue show cause notice. The grievance of the petitioner is mostly about the merits. It is pleaded that even according to the show cause notice or the analysis report the sample left with the petitioner accorded with the specifications, the question of taking any further action does to arise. This, however, is a mater, which the petitioner can plead before the respondent. The apprehension of the petitioner that dehors the explanation which he may offer, the respondent would cancel the dealership agreement, can be taken care of by directing that in the event any adverse order being passed against the petitioner, the same shall not be given effect to, for a period of two (2) weeks from the date of its communication. 4. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to submit explanation within two (2) weeks from today. In case, the respondent passes any order, adverse the interest of the petitioner on consideration of such explanation, it shall not be given effect, for a period of two (2) weeks from the date of its communication. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J March 21, 2011. KTL