THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL. Writ Petition (S/S) No. 606 of 2009. Bhagat Singh. … Petitioner. Vs. State of Uttarakhand and two others. …Respondents. Mr. Rajendra Tamta, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Upadhyay, Brief Holder, learned counsel for the respondents. Date September 16, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Mr. Rajendra Tamta, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to make a representation to appropriate authority for redressal of his grievance. Permitted to withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioner is given liberty to make a representation to the appropriate authority for redressal of his grievance. If such a representation is made by the petitioner, the authority concerned shall decide the representation by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order along with the representation. (B.S.Verma,J.) RCP