IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN MONDAY, THE 31ST MAY 2010 / 10TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 16635 of 2010(D) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ BABY AUGUSTINE,S/O.AUGUSTINE,AGED 61 YEARS, RESIDING AT MADAKKAL HOUSE,PRAVITHANAM,PALA. BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- THE SECRETARY,REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,ERNAKULAM. BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. K.C. SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss K. SURENDRA MOHAN, J. ------------------------------------------------------------ W.P(C) NO: 16635 OF 2010 D ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 31st May, 2010. JUDGMENT The petitioner is a stage carriage operator conducting services on the route Pala-Ernakulam on the strength of a regular permit issued to the stage carriage bearing registration No: KL-17/F 191. On 6/8/2007 the petitioner submitted a request for the revision of his own timings. However, the same was not considered. Therefore, the petitioner filed W.P(C) 31209/2007 before this Court praying for an expeditious consideration of the same. As per Ext.P2 judgment, this Court directed the same to be considered. Thereafter the timing conference was held on 9/4/2008 but, the same was adjourned indefinitely. Thereafter, though the petitioner had submitted a reminder to the respondent, there was no action. 2. In the above circumstances, a timing conference has been scheduled to be held on 8/7/2010 for the purpose of considering Ext.P1 request. In view of the above lapse of three years since the submission of his application, the petitioner has submitted Ext.P6, an additional representation. The petitioner apprehends that on 8/7/2010 only his earlier request would be considered. Therefore, he prays for the issue of appropriate directions for the WPC 16635/2010 2 consideration of his additional request evidenced herein by Ext.P6 also. The learned senior Govt. Pleader has no objection to such a direction being issued. 3. In the above circumstances this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider the additional request of the petitioner evidenced herein by Ext.P6 also while considering his request for revision of his own timings evidenced herein by Ext.P1 on 8/7/2010. K. SURENDRA MOHAN Judge jj WPC 16635/2010 3