IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2501 of 2010 1. ANADO BALKESH DUBEY SANSKRIT PRATHMIK SAH UCHCHA BALIKA VIDYALAYA PANDIT KESHWARPURI KATHDIHARI, P.S- SASARAM, DISTT- ROHTAS, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY SRI SHIV SHASNKAR DWIVEDI S/O LATE BALKESH DUBEY R/O VILL- KATHDIHARI, P.S- SASARAM, DISTT- ROHTAS Versus 1. THE BIHAR SANSKRIT SIKSHA BOARD EAST BORING CANAL ROAD, P.S- BUDDHA COLONY, DISTT- PATNA THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN 2. THE CHAIRMAN, BIHAR SANSKRIT SIKSHA BOARD, EAST BORING CANAL ROAD, P.S-BUDHA COLONY, DISTT- PATNA 3. THE SECRETARY BIHAR SANSKRIT SIKSHA BOARD, EAST BORING CANAL ROAD, P.S- BUDH COLONY, DISTT- PATNA ----------- 2. 25.02.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The grievance is with regard to non-issuance of OMR forms to the institution for enabling its students to appear at the Madhya Examination 2009-2010. The submission is that the school has been established in the year 1978 and recognition granted by the Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board vide Annexure 2 dated 6.10.1993. In pursuance thereof the students of the petitioner institution have been regularly appearing at the Madhyama Examination. This application is disposed with the observation that if recognition by the Board is a fact, and the recognition has not been modified/varied/cancelled till date and remains operative, the Board is obliged to consider the matter in that perspective within a maximum period of four weeks and dispose the proposed representation of the petitioner in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order adequately dealing with the order dated 6.10.1993 to facilitate judicial review should the need arise. It is expected that all issues with regard to the claim that the students of the institution have regularly been permitted to appear in the examination for years since 1993 inclusive of the order dated 6.10.1993 shall find adequate and full consideration in the order of the Board. In the event that the Board proposes to issue OMR forms it shall also be required to discuss why forms were not issued compelling the institution to file writ application for that purpose. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)