1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 126 OF 1998 IN SUM. SUIT NO. 4626 OF 1997 Zeus Air Services Pvt. Ltd., .. Plaintiffs vs. M/s. Avon Industries. .. Defendants. Ms. Alpana Ghone i/by Shah & Sanghvi for plaintiffs. Mr. A.N. Singh i/by N. Dinkar Rao for defendants. CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J. CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J. CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J. DATE : 5th September, 2005. DATE : 5th September, 2005. DATE : 5th September, 2005. P.C. . The present suit is filed for recovery of a sum of Rs. 2,0919,627 as due and payable in respect of the freight charges covered under various railway bills as stated in para. 2 of the plaint and interest at the rate of 21% of the amount of Rs.10,475/-. The defendants are served. Defendants have filed Vakalatnama. The summons for judgment is taken out. There is no reply to the summons for judgment. Since none was appearing for the 2 defendants on the last occasion, i.e. 18.8.2005 and on 31.8.2005 by my order dated 31.8.2005 I directed the plaintiffs to give notice to the defendants’ advocate and placed the matter today on Board. The learned counsel appearing for the defendants states that they have addressed a letter to their client and informed them that the matter is fixed on Board but he has no instructions. The original documents are taken on record and marked P-1. In view of the aforesaid, suit decreed as prayed. 2. In view of the disposal of the suit, the summons for judgment does not survive. The same is disposed off accordingly.