IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21101 of 2010 JAGDISH SAH @ VIDHAYAK . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 25.06.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The defence of the petitioner in a Police case under Sections 395 and 412 of the Penal Code is that the allegations are against 10 – 15 unknown. The petitioner has been named by co-accused Shiv Bachan Mahto who has himself been enlarged on bail in Cr. Misc. No. 11788 of 2010. This Court finds that apart from the petitioner 16 accused have already approached this Court for bail. The petitioner is the seventeenth. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah in Sugauli (Motihari) G.R.P. PS Case No. 26 of 2009. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)