SJBgIa Bencff ^/^ \ ^]- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETmON(S)No. M')-k<) 0^2006 PETITIONER \^ ^-- . ^••^ ^ ^t" .3..-''' ..•••'..lL'\cfc>'' cy k'^^ RESPPNDE^TS .0°'^ ^> *^€^1 )€> ^.^ <.o fr.- c^'^ Smt.J.Pankaj W/o Shri / N.P.Pankaj , aged about 48 years , Assistant Grade III, Office of Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Raigarh , resident of Quarter No. KH-17, South Chakradhar Nagar, Degree College Road, District- Raigarh (CG). VERSUS : l.The State of Chhattisgarh,, through the Secretary , Public Works Department, Mantralay , D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Division Raigarh, Tahsil and District Raigarh (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH: BILA8PUR Sin^e Beach: Hon'Me Shri Satish K. AgaUiotri, J. W. P. No. 4743 of 2006 Petitioner : Sint. J. Paakaj Versus Respondents The Slate of Chhattisgarh & aaofher Shri Rakesh Anthony, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S. Moorthy, Dy. Advocate Geueral with Shri Satish Gupta, Deputy Govt Advocate for the State/respondents. ORDBR (4tb ofSeptember, 2(W6) By fhis petition, the petitiouer has chaUenged tegaUty of the transfer order dated 6.7.2006 (Aanexure P-1) whereby he has been transferred fix>in Raigarh Diwision to Ambikapur Circle. The inaui grievance of the petitioner is that he is working as Assistant Grade-III and fhe seniorily of Assistant Grade-III einployees are beiag matataincd circle wise and in support, a gradation list has beeu enclosed as Anaexure P-2 which has not been denied by leamed Deputy Advocate General for the State. Leanied counsel for the petitioner subinits that if the order iinpugned is aUowed to be executed, then fhe seniority of the petitioncr shall be afiFected, therefore, fhe petitioaer inay be atlowed to inake a deteited representatioa to respondeut No.l ^' aud in tum, the respondents be directed to dec.uie fhe same in accoidance with law. Haviag heard leamed counsel for the parties aad having regard to the facts and circuinstances of the case, without expressing any opiaion on tbs merit ofthe case, the petituner is aflowed to make a detailed representation raisiag aU Uis grievances to respondeut No. 1 within 10 days firom today along with a copy ofttus petitfon & aancxures.Qn such representation J- being fifcd fhe respondent No. 1 shaB decide the same within a period of 30 days fium the date of receipt of the said representation ia accordance with law afiter considering atl fhe points raised by the petitioner. In the nieantune, tiU the decision offhe representation the effect and operation of the impugned order dated 6,7.2006 (Aaaexure P-1) in respcct ofthe petitioiier shaB remain stayed. Wifti the direction aforesaid, fhe pctitkin stends disposed of. Consequenfly, M.(W.)P. No. 3669/06, also stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. -__ Sd/- st-tishK.AgniJ,otri SaVbaah