1 wp5956­11 rpa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURSIDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5956 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. ..... Mr. N. V. Walawalkar, senior counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Umesh R.Mankapure for respondent No.2(b). ..... CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 22, 2011. P.C.: Heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners. The petitioners are the respondents in an Appeal preferred by the respondents­plaintiffs. By the impugned order, pending the Appeal, the amendment of the plaint has been permitted. The impugned order is of interlocutory nature. Moreover, in the event, the decree passed by the Appellate Court is adverse to the petitioners, while challenging the decree for possession by filing appropriate proceeding, the petitioners can always challenge the impugned Judgment and order. 2. Moreover, the petitioners are entitled to file the written statement and raise all permissible contentions while dealing with the 2 wp5956­11 amended portion of the plaint. 3. Subject to what is observed above, the writ petition is rejected. 4. All contentions of the parties on merits are kept open. (A.S.OKA, J.)