Yi. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR {CHHATTISGARW M .C.C No. 39^ /2006 Petitioner Lalsai Khunte aged aboput 40 years S/o Kartik Ram R/o ViUage Jangahan Post Mukta, Tahsil and Thana Malkhaauda, Distt. Janjgir Champa VERSUS Respondents ^. Nirraal Sinha aged about 32 years S/o N&ndr&m Sinha, R/o Villa.ge and post Hasaud, Tahsil and Thana Jaijaipur, Distt. Janjgir Champa Chain Singh Sana.ie aged about 44 years,S/o Anand rasa Sainle R/o Village Adil Post Orda, Tahsil and Thana Malkharaud Distt. Janjgir Champa Dayaram Koshle ageda bout 58 years, S/o Kunjram Koshle, R/o Village Post Jaijaipur Tahsil and Thana Malkharauda Distt. Janjgir Champa Jambulal Khunte aged about 25 years R/o Village jamgahan Post Mukta,Tahsil and Thana MaJkharatida Distt. Janjgir Chmpa Bandhulal aed about 35 years, S/o Bodoram R/o Village and post Bandora Tahsil and Thana Malkharaud Distt. Janjgir Chmpa Tarjan Siongh aged about 26 years, S/o Late Shri Kartikram R/o Village Post Piharid,Tahsil and Thana Malkharauda Distt. Janj'gir Chmpa Rajkumar aged about 32 years S/o Wl ;. ^. Deoram, R/o ViIIage and post Odekera,Tahsil and Thana Malkharauda Distt. Janjgir Chmpa APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 116-B OF THE REPRESSNTATION OF THE PBOPLE ACT 19S1 XI-HC-22 a'n^T^ir f^i^sn^T shiitiBfscr SPIR) 3^ '<ii^i(n<4, ®Tn<i'is,Riciwy )VlG-C^ ^l^l^lcb " tTraCTr'gs.iTOi""—-•-'"--•"^ ' 2^ f^s sn^TTOiTWtrittr Shri Parag Kotecha, Co |insel for fhe petitioner. Shri Pradeep Saxena, C^uusel for respondent No. 1. Shri Prakash Tiwari, Co|unsel for respondent No.2. None for ofher respond^nts. Leamed counsel for th] fhe objection pointed out by pie Registiy, he has filed appUcation in proper fonnat, aiemo of a|ppearance and afSdavit. To reiaove objection regarduig non-fum he has filed an appUcation fc|r exeniptuig him froni filmg certified copy of the judginent dated O ^ Heard on I.A.No. 2450/| the default, I.A.No. 2451/200)l 'him fi-om. filuig certified copy| record. AU these application^ 1 aad2. After due considerationl tpplication is not in proper appearance. wriwft^ inwff ff tet3'tftTRTC ^arf^q'an^r petitioaer subinits fhat to reinove shiag of cei-tified copy of judgaient, /08/2006. 2006 i.e,, aa application for reiaoving 6 i.e., aii application for exeiaptinj ofthe judgment dated 01/08/2006 and I.A.No.2468/2006 i.e., a|n application for takiag affidavit on arc not opposed by i^spondents No. appUcation for exeiaption froni filing certified copy of the ji^dgineat dated 01/08/2006 and I.A.No.2468/2006 i.e., an ap]|)Ucation for takiag affidavit on record are allowed. So far defai^lt poiated out by fhe office, that 'onnat aad non-subinission. of ineiuo of appearaace both fhese d^faults have been reinoved by fhe petitioner by filing applicatiJ3n ia proper fq@ia<_and_ineino of ff^y^) k' iniai 3TQ jff'JSquisl^i SB '•01.3 XlB^BS ^TIB M^, sgiiipaaoo.td aq+ ai S^OA -to s^diopjB) •jatsigsy 310 u5is o^ ayiyi^ aiBGiaj neqs lltrq ^u Pisq s^sod jg^ pire SE'ON ^oasiUlts'aoo '^qiDJ; '^tqinassv 3AT}B{sig3q jo jaquiapii ary. TP.TM paqoi^^'e ssgauAud pire sitq •paAKfs iiiBin|a 900S/80/IO p3^p -rspio 3tp jo uont ^eadde aqi jo Sni[g ttp jo SABp (aasgil:) giii^aonoj aip. TIO ^noi}n]:os Svi.Sy: 3ip Ot 900S/80/ZO ps^p jspjojo seq '^oy aif^ jo V-91 T tloI^03S JSpTT)'1 sjojaq ^Badde ue 3]g 05. aop.aattn: aoitoas J3pun uoi^BOT[ddB ^.uEtsui 31 uo paiepap SBA qoiqM Apnsssv sip. GI gg'ON Aouan^p.saoo A{qui3S< iesp3q jaaoiip.ad 3tp jo uoiiosp aip uo^osia TO psssiid 900E/80/IO PS4^1 'toy 3ido3ij jo aori.Biussaids; japan nottBoiiddB TIB '•3'i 900E/6( i^uehiyte^ liausp: <?i£[.^.piui i4)^41Il'fe 'asnOH [p o^ jo asnoH sqi jo • ^OH I[BT(S J3UOpT13(J (g Apzo ]ieqs jauoi^T^aj (g •papaadsns O.o 1.1 o^ -^asnfosnoa >ssv vprveiBTpye]/^ [O V3VQ. (^SOd) ^B3S IqStt 'sJSMod siq uv (l {[BT[S 'ijnoo sno ^Cq passed e.iado ycp. '-l3Ti-t83 si jaAaqoiqA Q\ pcaa aip JQ): 'suortjpuoo ? aoiiBiqis^ PIOAB oj, •aorisnfjo spaa tacfKiado 3ip £e^a o^. pa^Kid |i iJnoQ amsjans sq}. 3^q,noH iaiAoqs '^y 3tR JO 3-91 l ^ ^q J3HOi^L}3j -SOOS/SI/frO ^q.BisTga'i sifs^s II-regsW13TITIO IV vpweiBTfSQBy^ roo-g a^nnq^ ^PJSB ^38 •bOOS/60'c)N aonnsci p japjo apiA unoo siqj, •(^ovsm,, 'trFojsoasqnsQT: aq^ jo g-9i i ao^oss ^e-ON'O'O-N QO presH Slft USJH.ttellMS 1^1 •-S - 'S»oy dez lifi..................... ^UtifiDdiiUt ^ <*>Kh IA^I ^fittU^ '2)l,t»|jl®'bUlh.lh" lap uyrt *ihtg li^ue+jhy Jifei^UE n-OH-K XI-HC-22 sn^r^r f^lN?3(I^T ailittiBfScT Raju 3^ •^WM^, sST5\W16, fstc^|yy< 3T^5Ttra^' *fTqcITsh*ll<*i CT^ 200 ^, f^s -^. aii^rSTciTW^fer If respondents No.3 tip order, they inay i-aise fheir or situation cropped up sttall be at liberty to inove accordance with ]aw. A copy of this order Conunissionaad Speakerof shall be entifled to have copyj M.C.C.No.399/2006, 2452/2006aad 2468/2006 7 have aay grievaace agamst the gijievaace. If any new events take place waiT^ntuig fhe review of the oiiler, parties f}us Court for appropriate direction io. WlfeN^T WRff ^'fei^t-rfSfRTC ^srf^Hsn^T pe sent inuaediately to the Election (he State Legislative Asseiubly. Parties of it in accoidaace wifh law. ^A. Nos. 2433/2006, 2451/2006, staiid disposed aSf^ "ISBBBSSJSI V.K.Shrivastava Judge ^ffK^'Sfflw^