IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.917 of 2007 SONA DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 3 18.09.2008 This revision application has been filed against the order dated 17.5.2007 in Maintenance Case no. 13 of 2006(A) by Principal Judge, Family Court, Kaimur at Bhabua whereby Principal Judge, has refused to grant maintenance. Heard learned counsel for the both and parties and perused the impugned order. On perusal of the impugned order, particularly paragraph 5, it appears that the petitioner had illicit relation with Rambachan Bind which would also be apparent from Ext. A. It further appears from the paragraph 6 that the son of the petitioner is also not the son of the Opposite party no. 2. O.P. No. 2 is issueless. The son of the petitioner has been set up to grab the properties of O.P. no. 2. The son of the petitioner is also major from whom she (the petitioner) can claim maintenance. In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is quite clear that the claim of maintenance of the petitioner is barred under section 125(4) of Cr.P.C. as she is leading adulterous life with one Ram Chandra Bind. In the result, this application is rejected. pkj (Ghanshyam Prasad,J)