THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.7922 of 2011 Dated 25th March, 2011 Between: S.Nadipi Channaiah …Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Commissioner of Endowments, Hyderabad and others. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri K.V.N.Bhupal Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3: Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments Counsel for respondent Nos.4 and 5: -- Counsel for respondent No.6: Sri V.T.M.Prasad, standing counsel for Endowments The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in Memo Rc.No.DP1(GRV) 10th/32961/2010, Dated 30.11.2010 passed by the 1st Respondent and its consequential Proceedings of the 2nd Respondent in Rc.No.A2/1400-2/2008/EO, Estt., Dated 03.01.2011 appointing the 4th and 5th Respondents as Single Trustee to the 6th Respondent Temple and to pass such other order….” After arguing the case for some time, Sri K.V.N.Bhupal, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to his client to avail appropriate remedy available to him in law. The request of the learned counsel for the petitioner is accepted. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.9843 of 2011 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 25th March, 2011 GHN