IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WPMS NO. 153 OF 2009 Mursalin ……Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. ……….Respondents. Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Advocate for the State of Uttarakhand / respondent no. 1 and 2. Mr. D.S. Patni, Advocate for the respondent no.3. 12th February, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the recovery against him. Admittedly, the petitioner had taken loan and the same is being recovered from him as arrear of land revenue. Now, he has stated at bar with joint request, which has been agreed by the counsel for the respondent no.3 that the petitioner will pay the entire loan amount though he (petitioner) has requested for payment of the same in easy instalments. 2. The petitioner will repay the entire loan amount in four equal quarterly instalment, which will include the recovery charges. The first instalment shall be paid on 1st March, 2009. On default of the payment, the Bank / respondent no.3 may recover the loan amount as arrear of land revenue. 3. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 12.2.2009 Rathour