IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 210 OF 2003 WRIT PETITION NO. 210 OF 2003 WRIT PETITION NO. 210 OF 2003 Shri Harmandeep Singh Gill ... Petitioner V/s The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents Mr. Siddharth Shah holding for P.M. Shah for the petitioner. Mr. J.P. Sen i/by Desai & Diwanji for Respondent No.7. Mr. V.P. Malvankar, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 & 5. CORAM: H.L. GOKHALE & CORAM: H.L. GOKHALE & CORAM: H.L. GOKHALE & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. J.H. BHATIA, JJ. J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED: 29TH JUNE, 2006 DATED: 29TH JUNE, 2006 DATED: 29TH JUNE, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C.: 1. Mr. Siddharth Shah appears for Mr. P.M. Shah for the petitioner. He has filed a civil application of the original petitioner. It states in para 6 that the circumstances of the case have changed and at present the petitioner family’s income exceeds the limit of Rs.1,50,000/-, for ascertaining the eligibility as a weaker section person. He has made prayer (b) through civil application affirmed on 23.6.2006 stating that two other persons, namely, one Shailesh Narmadashankar Oza 2 and Umanand Singh Ganesh Singh, be brought in as petitioners. These two other persons have filed their affidavits saying that their income is less than Rs.1,50,000/-. If that is so, let them file their own petitions if they are aggrieved by the decision which is sought to be challenged in the present petition. The petition, at the instance of the original petitioner, challenging the decision of the authorities under the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 can no longer be continued. The petition is, therefore, disposed of. 2. Interim orders passed in this petition stand vacated. 3. Since the petition is disposed of, the civil applications therein also stand disposed of. ..... ( H.L. Gokhale, J. ) ( J.H. Bhatia, J. )