IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST JUNE 2011 / 11TH JYAISHTA 1933 RP.No. 244 of 2011() ------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN RFA.320/2010 Dated 23/12/2010 ............ REVIEW PETITIONER / APPELLANT / IST DEFENDANT: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AZAD RAHIM, AGED 62, S/O.LATE A.A.RAHIM, MALIKAVEEDU, KOTTAKAKOM WARD, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) RESPONDENTS / RESPONDENTS / PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS 2 TO 4 AND ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDITIONAL 5TH RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------------------ 1. ANZAR RAHIM, S/O.LATE A.A.RAHIM, PALM GROVE, THEKEVILA, KOLLAM. 2. LAILA ASLAM, D/O.LATE A.A.RAHIM, BLUE MOUNT, KOTTAKKAKOM WARD, KOLLAM. 3. JAMEELA SALI, D/O.LATE A.A.RAHIM, LEPERY HOUSE, ALISSERY WARD, NEAR COLLECTORATE, ALAPPUZHA. 4. SHAMEELA FAZAL, D/O.LATE A.A.RAHIM, MANAPAT HOUSE, NEAR MALABAR CHRISTIAN COLLEGE, KANNUR ROAD, CALICUT. 5. RAHIYANATH AZAD, W/O.AZAD RAHIM, MALIKAVEEDU, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI. P.B. KRISHNAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ. ----------------------------------- R.P.NO.244 OF 2011 IN R.F.A.NO.320 OF 2010 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 1st day of June, 2011 O R D E R Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan,J. Learned counsel for the review petitioner says that the order sought to be reviewed was challenged before the Apex Court and that SLP was dismissed. He says that the order sought to be reviewed will be complied with in three weeks' time by making all payments. We record the submission. In case of failure of such payment, any persons aggrieved will be at liberty to move this Court for violation of this undertaking and also the direction contained in the order sought to be reviewed to make the payment. The review petition is dismissed with the aforesaid observation. RP.244/11 2 We also record that if payments due until today from the first defendant is paid in terms of this order, he will stand relieved from receivership from today, however, he will be treated as the custodian till actual possession is transferred to the next receiver, if so ordered. Post RFA.320/10 on 23.6.2011. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. Sd/- P. BHAVADASAN, Judge. kkb.2/6.