..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE, JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE, JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE, JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.264 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.264 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.264 OF 2006 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.243 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.243 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.243 OF 2006 Arjun Laxman Jogadia ...Applicant. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. . . . Mrs.Sushma Nair Advocate for the Applicant. Smt.V.R.Bhosale, APP, for the State. . . . CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED : MARCH 22, 2006. DATED : MARCH 22, 2006. DATED : MARCH 22, 2006. P.C.: . Heard the learned Advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the State. There is delay of 10 days in filing the Appeal. The accused is life convict and is undergoing the sentence. In the circumstances, the delay is condoned. Application disposed of. . Appeal is admitted. . Put up the Appeal with confirmation proceeding No.1 of 2006. (D.G.DESHPANDE, J.) (D.G.DESHPANDE, J.) (D.G.DESHPANDE, J.) ..(2).. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)