IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3506 of 2010 SANJAY KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ----------- 02. 1/9/2010 Counsel for the petitioner seems to be correct that some mistake has crept in recording of the two orders in the two writ applications which were filed by the same petitioner but with relief directed against two District Magistrates of Darbhanga and Vaishali. The payment has been made by the District Magistrate, Vaishali to the petitioner on account of the bill for repairing, greasing and painting of ballot boxes which were used for conducting Panchayat Election in the year 2006. He, however, prays that since there was delay in payment, he should be entitled to some interest for the delayed payment in absence of any cogent reason for such delay. Let it be recorded that the writ application is disposed of with a direction upon the District Magistrate, Vaishali that in case petitioner makes out a case for payment of interest , the same shall be considered and appropriate decision communicated to the petitioner within a period of four months from the date of communication/production of a copy of this order. The earlier direction dated 11.2.2010 stands modified in the above circumstance. The modification stands allowed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)