IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 369 of 2003 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- ALIAS MANUBHAI SIPAI @ ILIASBEG MUNAVERBEG MIRZA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Criminal Application No. 369 of 2003 MR RAJESH K KANANI for Petitioner No. 1 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent No. 1,4 DS AFF.NOT FILED (R) for Respondent No. 2-3,5 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA and MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE Date of decision: 23/04/2003 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA) #. As per the order dated 17.4.2003 passed by this court respondent No.3-Taslimabanu is produced by her father Gafarbhai, respondent No.2. We had first ascertained wishes of Taslimabanu in chamber. She had specifically told us in presence of learned APP, Shri Pancholi that she is not willing to go and stay with the petitioner and she wants to go and stay with her parents. Thereafter, we had called the learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Kanani and Shri Saiyed for private respondents. In their presence also, she stated that she is not willing to go and stay with the petitioner. #. In view of the above, learned counsel Shri Kanani for petitioner, on instruction from the petitioner, who was also present in the court, sought permission to withdraw this petition to which neither Shri Saiyed appearing for private respondents nor Shri Pancholi, learned APP have no objection. #. In view of the above, permission is granted. Dismissed as withdrawn. Rule is discharged. No order as to costs. (B.J.Shethna, J.) (A.L.Dave, J.) *Pvv