HC-22 SD^IWT Ri-fi* sii^r Sb+lich ^lft^ ^ 'S^ -^MM^, vs-Avi^, 'f^?IRT snt?nrag? 02?. P- ^O. ^"Wl. 200 titNCTI Olllch fq^sr' sn^i^TOiiw ^f?g PE'Ti'TIONBR adui Siaved Ji aboiit 43| Engiaeer G<?lleetoia|te MIG 60, Versus Aluned, S/o Syed Aluned AU, aged years, presentl)' working as Sub |in the Tribai Welfare Department, Office, Korba, R/o Sharda Vihar, T^iuisport Nagai, Koroa (CG) RESPONDBNTS 1. State o Urban Ueparaiient, 2. The Set Tribe, Welfarej (CG) 3. The Departijrien.t Caiapu^, 4. The Asfc Depart]|aen4 (CG) WRIT PETITIOS GNDBR ART1 Chhatdsgarh, through the Secretary, Adaunistration aad Developineis.f DKS Bhawan, Raiipiu- (CG) t:retary, Scheduted Caste, Scheduled Backward Classes and Minorily Departinent, DKS Bhawaa, Raipiir iepart]|aen SB;HON^SHRI DHIREHDRA 10-12-2008 Shri Anaad Dadanya, Shri Anm Sad, Govt. 2. ; The petitionfir, who is| AdnuiustTatlon Uepartment, parent department to the Tribe, backward Classes and hereinafter referred to as tlte ^t4i^t<fli ^i^df^ ^^ <F>I^K ^TsiPnqaiieSr Commissioner, Tribal Wetfare jaen.t Ravi Shankar Uiuvergily i, Raipur (CG) ^istant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare laent, CoUectiorate Campus, Korba ICtLB 226/227 OF THE CON3TITCTIOK OF iHDIA MISHRA. J Ajivocate, for the petitioner. Ad|vocate, Advocate for the State. working as Sub Engineer in Urbaa was posted on deputation fioin fhe partment of Schediue Cast, Scheduled winority Welfare Department (for short, 'SC/ST Departinent') vide order of -HC-22 an^i-gii K'li* sf^s ^flTcti ^^v\ T Tig "'lllM'4, anlwi®.1^?n 3n^?r IRT^ ^i^....^0;...^.50/°<^ "ff% 200 *it*icn 'ER*nqi ^S^fl' 3ii^ii?^iiw<riOT -^- Annexure P-1 dated 19-7-2 due consent froin the S repatriated to his or^iaal dated 18-1-2006. The ouy petitioner is ftiat lus servio department without consent 2002. 2fl)02. Tfie above onder was passed after p/ST Departuient. However, he was ^epartmentvide order of Annexure P-3 ^round ui^ed by learaed counsel for the ts have been repatriated to his origmal ^fthe SC/ST' Department 3. Leamed counsel for fh' fhe matters of Unioa of Indla and Others1 , submits that sent ondeputation should a fixed period or iu posthast^ seut on deputation witli however lus services have without formal consent froni Hianner. He furftier contend nud-session taav adverselv presentfy pursiiing their 4. Qn the other hand, le tfie petttiorier has no legal already remained on depu J f^(2005)SSCC39- <»tl<<Icl<ill lllcif ^ fB^ <f»l'yi< •^sipOTail^l s petitioner relying upon the judgment in and Another—v-V. Ramateishnan stuaies iniiaarily, the employees who have been be repatriated, ifthe deputation is for :. In the mstaat case, thc petitioner was conseut of bofh fhe departments, repatriated to his parent department the SC/ST Department, in a posthaste s ttiat repatriation of fhe petitioner in fhc studies oflus chiidren, who are iu Kusmunda, Korba. nbt ctue bden slBect fcmed counsel for the State subinits that tight to continue on deputation. He has (ation for about 4 yeara aud it is fhe rtfro; sn^i ^r h-u^i an^r Sft*li<t> flf^T 9/- t|W?(T(h*ll<*> 3TRf?T TR^ j^L...^....^y/c c ...............^ ^ ' (c|*<i8t""""""""""""""""""" CT^liTRHW 'dfel -5. prerogattve of fhe parent deps|rtment to repatriate the services of the petitioner to his origuial deparjhiient. 5; I have faeard leamed coi^nsel for the parties. &. It is settlea law ttiat] continue in aeputatton. froinl peti.tion, it is clear that tiiere individtial in rcpatrtatuig the departm.eat. Therefore, consuf sent on deputatibn on 19-7-^ vide brder of AImexure P-3 d^ted and furflier considermg fhat tjy Cottrt, the petitioner is conti4i-tmg Korba tiU date, I am of the op^ubn or jurisdicfional error commit|ted fhe impugned order of aanext<re 7. TIie petition. beiag dismissed aad is accordingly q)l<4[ci<fl1t TTffl^f ^ 'fel3t' ^piK-^K ^SlPOTSTt^I deputationist has no legal r^ht to perusal of ftie avennent inade in this [s no aUegation of malafide agamst any Iservices of the petitioner to his parent |ering fhe fact fhat the petitioner was ?002 and his services were repatriated 18-1-2006 i.e. aliaost after 4 years |y virtue of intermi order passed by this at his present place of postiag at fhat mere is no illegality, mfimiity by fhe respondent No. 1 ia passing P-3. dtwoid of substance, deserves to be (lisiuissed. Sd/- j DhlIe^Mish», ITT'W^-'"'