^;.'1!^'; Hfett COURT OF CHHATTtSGARH AT BILASPUR WritPetttion<SVNo.^1 of 2008 Petitioner Munendra Kumar Sharma, S/o Shri Yadunahdan Prasad Shaima, aged about 46 years, Assistant Teacher, Shashkiya Kanya Prattiamik Shala, Sakri, Btock Takhatpur, Distt. BHaspur, (C.GJ. Versus Respondents 1. 2. 3. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary, Schoot Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C-S-) Distrtet EducaUon Offlcer, Bitaspur, Distt. Bilaspur.CS.G.) Biock Education Officer, Block Takhatpur, Distt. Bilaspur, (C.G.) Mtaltyrl WR!TPETITOINUNDERARTICLE22SOF Ti-IECONSTtTUTlQNOFINDiA Singte Bench : Hon'bfe Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri K.S. Pawar, AdvocatefoFtHeRetitioner. Shri A. S. Kachwaha, Deputy Advocate General forthe responcients. ORALORDER (Passedonthis1^day(rfFebruary,2008) 1. The petitioner was appointed initialiy, on a fixed pay of Rs. 150/-. The petifioner was ttiereafter, granted regular {ayscal? on comptetion ofthe probation period. 2. The questionof law involved herein is, asto whether the petitfoner is entitied to regular pay scate w.e.f. the date of injtialappojntaient orfrom the date of completion of probation period. Learned counse! appearing for thepetitioner, as wel! as learned counset appearing for the respondents/State, jointly submit that the facts and '. question of law, involved in the present writ petition, are the same asto that of in W.P.(S) No. 5976^006 (Sushit Thf,'ari & others Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & others), which was allowed vide order dated 7.11 .200S; 4. in view of the above-stated submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, the v/rit petition is ailowed in thesame terms i.e. petiSoner is entitled for regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment.subjecttoverificatiOnGfthefacts.Noorderastocoste. Sd/- 3atish K. Agnihotri :^-^_ Judge 3. ^..