c^v IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No, ....a.......2002 PETITIONER ^t^-^ ..^l^ •^f v&^" RESPONDENTS Chimla S/o Madhuwa aged near about 40 years, R/o Village Belljaora Tah. Sitapur. VERSUS ^< The state of ChhaHisgarh Through : Tahsildar Sitapur District Sarguja (C.G.) 2, Reman Rai S/o Ganju Aged 50 years R/o V:!lage Beljora Tah. Sitjapur, Distt. Sarguja, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION feg XI-HC-22 3TI^?T^T ^w* sn^r stiiiti trf?a' SblRi gu"'Ta 1 ef ^' 3^ •<<i<ii<n<<, ssTlltf'is, fstdiyy iiiwi aiHrai ^1'^^ .l^.;f.;./.7.U V^ 1692- 1^% •Mi^TSWRreflfsa' 13.5.2005 <tr 5hri Manoj Paranjape, 5hri Pankaj Shriva| No.l. Shri M.K-Baig, counsel fe Heard on I.A.No.34811' withdrawal of 1+ie petition wil available under the taw. This application is not o^| as counseifor respondent No. The interim appiication (p. The petition is dismiss^d petitioner to wait appropriate cdunse ';ni's](<'l<Hl >iW<ll'fffetA<Rlt<l< ^sri^Tsn^r for the petitioner. , Panel Lawyer for the respondent No.2 2005 which is an iication for h liberty to avail appropriate remedy posed by the counse! for State as weii [.A.No.3481/2005) is allowed. as witiidrawn with a liberty to the 'emedy available under the taw. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge (^y»)