IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9302 of 2004 HARI PRASAD PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 6. 16.12.2009. Counsel for the petitioner points out that in the quoted portion at internal page 4 of the order dated 13.4.2009 in the 9th line from the bottom the word “fujLr“ has wrongly been typed which ought to have been “fu;qDr“. In this context, he would refer to Annexure-18 where the word “fu;qDr“ has actually been mentioned. Consequently, the word “fujLr“ will stand substituted by word “fu;qDr“. Subject to aforementioned modification / correction in the order dated 13.4.2009, the rest of the order will remain unaltered. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)