IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28113 of 2008 GANESH SHUKLA @ SONU SHUKLA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 23.9.2008 Heard. The case is under Section 394 of the IPC and the rejection order indicates that one witness in paragraph 13 of the case diary could have identified the petitioner. For recovery of the arms, a separate case has been registered as appears from the rejection order itself. Even if one accepts the finding recorded by the learned Sessions Judge that a witness had identified the petitioner, it could be at best a case of single identification. Let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Gopalganj in Bhorey P.S.Case no.30 of 2008. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )