THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1766 OF 2010 DATED:29-09- 2010. Between Sri Rodda Ramachander … Petitioner And 1.Chakali Chandrasekhar and five others …Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1766 OF 2010 ORDER: This revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order, dated 26-02-2010, in I.A.No.57 of 2009 in I.A.No.911 of 2007 in O.S.No.126 of 2005, on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Chevella, R.R. District, whereunder and whereby the application filed under Order I Rule 10 r/w Section 151 CPC to implead the petitioner as defendant No.5 in I.A.No.911 of 2007, was dismissed on the ground of lis pendency. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that the petitioner purchased the property from one of the sharers namely defendant No.4 and to safe-guard the right, title and interest to the extent of his share, he can be brought on record i.e., semblance of right he has got in the property and hence, he prays to allow the revision. 3. None appears for the respondents in spite of service of notice. 4. Under Order I Rule 10 CPC, a party can be brought on record at any stage of the suit provided the proposed party got some right or interest in the property. The suit is filed for partition and preliminary decree has been passed determining the shares of the parties. That preliminary decree has become final as none of the aggrieved persons filed an appeal. When a petition was filed by the plaintiffs for passing of final decree, the present application was filed by the petitioner to come on record. No doubt, the petitioner is pendente lite purchaser, but that does not mean he has no right or his right will be adversely affected in view of the decree. If the petitioner-third party is a bonafide purchaser for a valuable consideration without having knowledge of the pendency of the suit, in such circumstances, he can claim equities to the extent of properties that may be derived by virtue of preliminary decree from the vendor of the petitioner. Therefore, to safe-guard his interest, certainly he can come on record because when he says that he is bonafide purchaser of the property for valuable consideration, the same has to be established before the Court and after establishing, he can claim equities at the time of dividing the property among the sharers. Therefore, to claim equities to the extent of property from his vendor, who has got a share, he can come on record. 5. With the above observation, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed. No order as to costs. _______________ K.C. BHANU, J DATED:29.09.2010 Hsd