IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.74 OF 2005 FIRST APPEAL NO.74 OF 2005 FIRST APPEAL NO.74 OF 2005 alongwith alongwith alongwith FIRST APPEAL NO.75 OF 2005 FIRST APPEAL NO.75 OF 2005 FIRST APPEAL NO.75 OF 2005 Babasaheb Namdeo Barate ..Appellant versus Sanjay Dyanoba Barate & Others ..Respondents V.S.Gokhale for the Appellant Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Dated : 10th Jan, 2006 Dated : 10th Jan, 2006 Dated : 10th Jan, 2006 P.C. 1. Heard learned Advocate for the Appellant. The learned Advocate fairly submits that the appeal has become infructuous, in as much as the duration for which the trustees were appointed has expired. Hence, appeal is disposed of being infructuous. (S.R.Sathe, J.)