ENT THE HON'BLE^mGH COURT OF JUDICATURE. GHHATTISGARH at BILASPUR, WRIT PETITIONNO^W-^/2006. -^ PETITIONER ^^ .'•:' ....-••^•^ ^^"0> Smt. Marry Mafcsima Tirkey W/o Late Shri B.S.Tirkey Aged around 43 years, Occupation - House Wife Residmg_at: Behind Marbal House, RadhikaNagar, Supela, BHILAI - 490001 District: Durg (CG). RESPONDENTS VERSUS / \ .0' ^. ^ .^".^ w ^ /1. c^ .t-\p ^y' :^ 4. W^^f- A'a?-1-.^ys State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Ministry ofHome, Govemment of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralaya, RAIPUR-(CG). The Director General ofPolice, Police Head Quarters Chhattisgarh Police, RAIPUR-(CG) The Inspector General ofPolice, Sarguja Range, SARGUJA - (CG). The Superintendent ofPoIice, Balrampur District, BALRAMPUR-(CG). WRIT PET1TION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE ORDER AND DIRECTIONS IN THE NATUREOF CERTIORARY. IVIANDAIV1US ETC. ^. •teAi"^. ". WRITPETmON N0.3i8470R2006 Petitjoner Resoondents Versus Smt. MarryMaksimaTirkey State of Chhattisgarh & WRIT PETITSON UISiDER ARTiCLE 226 OF THE CONSTiTUTiON OF INDIA Present:- Shri B.P.Rao, Advocate for the petitioner. (Passed on 21" day of September, 2010) iv tftis Lacs, on the ground oratiy assured the petitioner (legal representative of the deceased Shri i.S.Tirkey) that she wouid be granted a sum of Rs. 10 Lacs in >SI 4 ^ ' not found that there is any instructlon or notlfication issued by the then The State Government, thereafter, took a policy deoision to provide s' payment of Rs. 10 Lacs from 20.5.2005 onwards !n the case on hand, the husband of •V ^fSS^iti,! 2CX35 and the petitioner was paid a sum of about Rs.13 Lscs, und< tieyaiii IS R.S. ^. 4. It is well settfed principleoflaw that a policy decisidfi-^fiotification cannot be made effective retrospectively, uniess contrary is prowcted in the poiicy decision / notification itself. It is ciear case of the State Government that all those poiice employees who have attained martyrdom in a naxalite .5.2005, which cannot lere is no merit of the case and tl petitioner is not entitied to any further additional sum, as the same is 4. A(X;ordino!v, the writ petitlon is dismissed. No order asto costs. asnoK Sd/- SatishKAgnihotri Judge