IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43290 of 2009 DILIP RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 17.12.2009 Heard. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that enmity was prevailing in between the parties. So, the petitioner involved for committing the offence under Section 436 of Indian Penal Code which really was an accident. But, now realising the fact and after resolving all the differences the informant has come forward with a compromise that house was not set on fire by the petitioner and his family members. In the facts and circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within one month from today, the petitioner, namely, Dilip Rai shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Mahua P.S.Case No.76/2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2)Cr.P.C. SKBOSE (Mandhata Singh)