^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Misc. PetitioaNo. 3426 of 1993 ..y Jeevanlal Ojha, aged about 30 years, Occupation-Daily \Vages employee in Krishi Upaj Maiidi Samiti, Mahasamund, District Raipur. Kaushal Srngh Thakur, aged about 40 years, Occupation-Daily Wages employee in I^jishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Mahasamund, District Raipur. Ku. Roopkumari Sahu, aged about 28 years, Occupation-Daily Wages employee in Krishi Upaj Mandi Sainiti, Mahasamuiid, Dists-ict Raipur. Hemla! Chandrakar, aged about 33 yeai-s, Occupatioa-Daily Wages employee in Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Mahasamund, District -ilALfUi, 6. 9. Thakur Rain Chandrakar, aged about 27 yeai-s, Occupatioii-DaiSy Wages employee in Krishi Upaj Maiidi Saiiiiti, Mahasamund, District Raipur. Devnarayaii Chandrakar, aged about 26 years, Occupation-Daily Wages employee in Krisli; Upaj Mandi Samiti, Mahasamund, District Raipur. Amn Kumar Shamia, aged about 28 yeai's, Occupation-Daily Wages eiuployee in Knshi Upaj Mandi SaiTiiti, Maliasamund, District Raipur. Kamal Narayaii Sahu, aged about 26 years, Occupation-Daily -\Vages employee in Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Mahasaimind, District Raipw. Maheshwai- Chandrakar, aged about 27 years, Occupation-Daily Wages empioyee in Krishi Upaj Mandi Sainiti, Mahasamund, District Raipur. .Deveadra Chaidrakat', aged about years, Oecupation-Daily Wages employee in Krishi Upaj Mandi Saniiti, Mahasaniund, Disti-ict 1. Director, Krishi Upaj Mandi Sarniti, Sahkar Bhawan, Bhopai. 2. Depun? Secretan'. M.P. Rajva Krislu Vipnaii Board, Raipur. 3. Krishi Uoai Maiidi Samiti, Mahasaniuiid, ti'iro-ugh its Secretar',', Mahasamund, District Raipur. •V.. .' -. '<- ^ (WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 QF iBE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Asnilioti-i. J.'! Sliri Aaiit Venna, Advocate fbrthe petitioners. Siiri Y.S. Tliakur, Advocate forthe respondents. -jn .l..^ n'FIV'r.-iyts ,1—. 1. '(.rassea on JU~' aay onviares, zuuy} Leamed counsel appearing tbr the petitioners on behalf of Sliri Aslush Shi-ivastava, on uistruction, seeks permission ofthis court to withdraw fhis petition on the ground that this petition has become infi-uctuous. No obiection from other side. It is ordered. 2. The petition is accordingly disimssed as withdi-awn, No order as to costs. 3. Consequently, pending applications, ifany, staiid disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agmiiotri Judge