”vi INTHE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W135 No. Ié ’2» /2oo}a~ ($.34 PETITIONE.§<"W //Ku. Trapati Kosariya, D/o Shri Rameshvar Prasad, aged about 42 yeérs, Bjlaspur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh , Through Sccretaly , Education Departmént , D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G‘.) Dimctor of public Instruction , Pensionbada Raipur (C.G.) \ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2g6OF THE X COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA i @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (5) No. 1162 of 200i Petitioner z Ku. Trapc‘ri Kosariya Versus Respondents Stafe of Chhaffisgarh & mofhgr Single Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Jus'rice safish K. Agnilwtri. Mr. Kumnred'l Tiwari, Advocate for 'l'he pefi'rioner. Smt Anju Ahujn, Depufy Eovemmerrr Advocate for fine State/respondents. 0 R D E R (Passe d on #his 28’“ boy of Fobnnry, 2007) horned counsel appuring for 1h: pofifioner submi'rs that the pe'rH'ioner is working as Lecturer. The petifioner obtained B. Ed. Examina‘rion oer‘rifica‘ie on 27.3.1996, on his own expenses. 2. Learned counsel appearing for fhc pefii'ioner submits that ihe ques‘l'ion involved, herein asfo whe'lher 'l’he foacher, who obtained B. Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses is entitled to two advance increments. 3. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to two advance increments in view of the decision of this Court in the case of Yoslwant Km Bhamdwoj Vs. Municipal Comorotion. Dug and another {2006 (H) MPJR—CG 96}. This Court in the ms? of Yashwmt Kumar Bhoradwqi Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), came to the conclusion that the teachers, who had obtained B. Ed. /B.T.I. Examination Certificate on their own @ expenses, are covered by the circular dated 24.12.98 isalrd by the S‘tme Govemmenf of Mndhya Pradesh. Lzamad counsel for 111a petitioner further submifs 'Hmf 1m facts and quesfion ofrlaw involved in m present case are squareiy covered by decision of this Cour‘r in fhe case of Yashwonf Kumar Bimrodwaj Vs. Municipa! Corporation. Durg and ano‘rhor (Supra), to which learned counsel appuring for ihe respondents fairly concedes and agrees wifh 'the avermenl' made by learned counsel appearing for fhe pefifioner. Accordingly, 1he wrif pefifion is allowed in farms of fhe order passed in the case of Vasimmt Kim:- shmdmj Vs. Mmipai Corporation, burg and anofher (Supra), subjecf fo verifiaafion of fhe fac'l' as To whefher the petitioner has acquired B. Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 & 1.3.1999 and further whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. ‘i ' l Sdl— i ‘ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge . Subhosh