IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 28197 of 2005 BETWEEN: Sanga Sanjay, S/o. Ramulu, R/o. Rangashaipet, Warangal, Warangal District. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Warangal. 2 The Deputy Superintendent of Police (Town), Warangal. 3 Station House Officer, Women Police Station, Subedari, Hanumakonda, Warangal. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or direction preferably writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent police in deleting the accused Nos.3 to 5 from crime No.366/05 and also inaction of the 1st Respondent in taking appropriate action for further investigation in the light of the latest representation Dt.20-12-2005 submitted by petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to record and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 1st respondent to order for further investigation in the above said crime and to include A3 toA5 in the said crime and pass such other or further orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.KOWTURU VINAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: Petitioner questions the impugned action of the police in deleting the names of the accused 3 to 5 from Cr.No.366 of 2005 on the file of the Station House Officer, Women Police Station, Hanumakonda, Warangal as illegal and arbitrary. He further submits that specific allegations have been made with regard to the harassment meted out by the accused 3 to 5 therefore, there cannot be any justification in deleting their names on the ground that there was no evidence against them. 2. Counter has been filed stating that investigation revealed that the husband and mother-in-law harassed the victim but there was no evidence against the accused 3 to 5, therefore, their names have been deleted. 3. If the petitioner is not satisfied with the manner of investigation and if there is any material to show that the accused 3 to 5 harassed the victim, the petitioner has remedy to file a private complaint under Section 190 read with 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which has to be proceeded in accordance with Section 210 Cr.P.C., but the petitioner is not entitled to any relief in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J July 10, 2008 DSK