IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 631 of 2011 Madan Pal ...Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and other …Respondents. Present: Mr. Niranjan Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N. P. Sah, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) Heard Mr. Niranjan Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. N. P. Sah, Standing Counsel for the respondents. While the petitioner was earlier working as Gram Panchayat Adhikari, Vikas Khand Bahadarabad, there were some complaints against him that he has made Below Poverty Line Cards de hors the rules and regulations applicable in such cases. Consequently a departmental proceeding was under contemplation against the petitioner, during which the petitioner has been suspended. There is absolutely no anomaly in the order dated 2.6.2011 passed by respondent no.1. As such, the writ petitions fails. However, it is directed that the respondents in case they finally decide to initiate departmental proceeding against the petitioner they should do so without undue delay. With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 22.6.2011 Kuldeep