w^ i RESPONDENTS Versus- 1. Ul THEIBOH COURT OF JUDICATVRE AT BH.AWUR Wit Petitton Ho.^?Z^L_/2004 PETITIONER : NmnalaBisen, ^ W/o Late Qopal Silagti Bisen, aged about 39 years, Qccupation - Uriemployed R/o Mamta Nagar, Street No.5 Rajnan<teaon)-Tahsilaad District- Rajnaa^aon (C.G.) L ' ' ' .• . / '•: Stete of Clihattiagarh, Tbrough. Secretary, RBViBnue Department, Mantralaya, D.K. 8. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). Collector, Rajnaadgaon(C.G.). Deputy'Director, Gdvt. Printing Press, Ctrildili, R^iiaiu^aon (C.G.). WIUT PMJTOS IIBBBR «A^ CGW8TlTrcnCW;^FI»B^^Jil^^IiaiBlS!M<»^^^^fi^ WRIT. ORDER <W Dro^Sl^ir ^^^^ D MATTER. ' : ':; ^ :.:: •"•' : 1;':',. ' ::::: •• ' •: . : ' ^.'" -^ 2, HIGH CQURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR SIngle Bench: Hoa'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. W. P. No. 3770 of 2004 Petitioner Respondents Versus Nirmala Bisen State of Chhattisearh & ofhers Shri H.S, Ahhrwalia, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel lawyer for fhe respoudents/State. (l8t September, 2006) I.A._ N0^8749/2006 This is an appUcation for withdrawal ofthe writ petition ou the grounds steted in fhe application, to which learaed couusel appeamig for the respondents has no objectidn. The appUcation is onlered as piayed for. Consequently, the writ petition is disniissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishIC.Agnihotri Judge t.i': ^••'.•'-bllash