1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPALICATION NO.48 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPALICATION NO.48 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPALICATION NO.48 OF 2006 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.26 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.26 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.26 OF 2006 Shri Rahul Amin @ Bablu Abdul Rauf Talukdar : Applicant. versus The State of Maharashtra : Respondent. Mr.M.S.Mohite, for the applicant. Smt.U.V.Kejariwal, APP, for the State. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE V.K.TAHILRAMANI JJ. V.K.TAHILRAMANI JJ. V.K.TAHILRAMANI JJ. DATED : APRIL 10, 2006. DATED : APRIL 10, 2006. DATED : APRIL 10, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant/accused and the learned APP for the State. This is an application for condonation delay of 471 days in filing the present appeal. 2 2 2 The present applicant/accused has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302. He is in jail. Considering the circumstances, this application is allowed. Delay is condoned. Criminal Application is disposed of. 2. So far as Criminal Appeal is concerned, heard both sides. Admit. [D.G.DESHPANDE,J] [D.G.DESHPANDE,J] [D.G.DESHPANDE,J] [V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J] [V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J] [V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J]