: 1 : CRR-123-10=.sxw USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COURT RECEIVER’S REPORT NO. 123 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO. 2553 OF 1992 Smt. Dhondubai N. Pahanewad & Ors. .. Plaintiffs v/s. Smt. Kamlabai & Anr. .. Defendants ......... Mr. B.S. Nayak for the plaintiffs Mr. S. Nagvadana i/by M/s. Mehta & Co. for defendant no.1 Mr. G.G. Ketkar, 1st Asstt. to Court Receiver. ......... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 1st SEPTEMBER,2010. P.C. : 1. Officer on behalf of the Receiver states that plaintiffs have not complied with the order as regards deposit of Rs. 17,350/-. By order dated 3rd August, 2010 plaintiffs were directed to deposit the aforesaid amount otherwise Receiver was to be discharged. Learned Counsel for the plaintiffs requested for adjournment for 4 weeks so that he could contact his clients. 2. In my view, sufficient time was given to plaintiffs to deposit the : 2 : CRR-123-10=.sxw amount. Hence, request to grant time cannot be accepted. Receiver stands discharged. Receiver’s charges payable are fixed at Rs.17,350/-. Plaintiffs are entitled to receive from the Receiver Rs.2,092/-, which amount is lying with the Receiver to be appropriated towards Rs. 17,350/-. Receiver to recover from the plaintiffs in accordance with the provisions of law. On account of discharge of the Receiver whatever royalty has been deposited by agent of the Receiver, defendant no.1 be repaid the same. This be done within 7 days from the production of authenticated copy of this order. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)