z •^s ^ t\ IN THE fflGH COURT OF JUDICATURE. AT- BILASPUR fC.G.) W.P.No. J?^1 OF 2004 BETWEEN PETITIONER .Af; ^•^ ^/i^ •"x>:^- ^..•7<€-'"" <^"~ KARAN SINGH KARASOLIA AGED- 42 YEARS, SON OF LATE SHRI M.L.KARASOLIA, POSTED AS- SUB-ENGINEER, AT- P.H.E. DIVISION, RAJNANDGAON DISTRICT- RAJNANDGAON (C.G.) R/0- KHAIRAGARH, (RAJNANDGAON). YERSUS .^'^ <<^'.» RESPONDENTS 1. ^•i:^:::- :^M ^S^. ••.y^'Tl^s'^' /••^"/ ^ '^. ^ - / ^.'B^".. "'%. 2. "•^^ -^, ^/ ^"^sv: 3. fca'^S^' ^j^v4- ®\© ^^ STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, THROUGH - THE SECRETARY, PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MANTRALAY, D.K.S.BHAWAN, RAIPR. ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF PUBLIC HEALTHENGINEERING CHHATTISGARH, RAIPUR. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING CIRCLE, RAIPUR. SHRI 8.K.GUPTA, ASSISTANT ENGINEER, CURRENT CHARGE, P.H.E. SUB-DIVISION, KHAIRAGARH, DISTRICT- RAJNANDGAON (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE- 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION, SUITABLE DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS. XI-HC-22 '3TST ^||<41<yl<ll, ^Tl1<-l^l<o, ^Krll^y 37T^T^T R-li^h 3Tlt?T 5FRW^1 \1 ^ ^^ 31lt^T 'q^? ^l*1<ni ^b^icb _JAJ.^ •^ 200^ 'iN^r' 371^1'^TT^R ^rft<T 03/09/2004: - Shri R.S. Patel, counsel forth^ Yashwant Thakur, G.A., Shri Satish Sandeep Dubey, Panel Lawyers, for tt^e State/respondents. Applioation for urgent hearing i cbl^(<n41v1 'RTR^ff ^ f^4l) ipal^K ^3Tf^fH37T^T petitioner. Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Advo^ate General, with Shri U.N.S. Deo, G.A., Shri iGupta, Dy.G.A., Shri Akhil Agrawal and Shri ^ allowed. Heard. Learned oounsel for the petitiottier submits that the matter reiates to transfer of the petitioner. He further submits thatjfor the present the petitioner may be given an opportunjty offiling the detailed repre^entation before the Competent Authority ofthe respondents, which shail be consider^ Having heard and considered| opinion on the merits ofthecasa in tt^ served if a direction is given to the peti| his grievance before the State/Comp^ copy of the petition and this order, wjt^ same on its own merits in accordanc^ d on its own merits in accordance with law. the rival contentions; without expressing any e opinion ofthis Court ends ofjustice would be tionerto make a detailed representation raising tent Authority of the respondents aiong with a iin ten days, and on such representation being made, the competent authority of th^ respondents shai! consider and decide the with iaw as eariy as possible, preferably within sjx weeks frdm the date of receipt of tt^e representation. if any contravention of policy or guideiines is brought to the notice, ^he same be considered on its own merits. Learned counsei for the peljitioner prays that after the decision of the representation, if any grievance of th^ petitioner remains he may be aiiowed to avail the remedy avaiiabie under the iaw. !|t is open to the petitioner to avail the remedy avaiiabie underthe law. With the aforesaid obsen/atton^ Consequently, M.W.P., ifany, ^, this petition stands disposed of. Mands disposed or. Certified copy as per rules. Copy to State counse! for com^liance. ^7N'rfe 3 /j/<^/ ^t^^/^— ^^v^\, ^.€^[^ Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ^i^ ^i-<