IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.993 of 2008 POONAM DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 22.04.2011 Petitioner is the informant of Saharsa P.S. Case No.200 of 2005 and thus igniter of criminal proceeding giving rise to Sessions Trial No.102 of 2006 wherein learned Trial Court, on a consideration of evidence on record, acquitted the Opposite parties of the charge(s) punishable under Section 302, 120B I.P.C. In the backdrop of the fact that the FIR was lodged after fifteen days the evidence on record was appraised by learned Trial Court. Learned trial court on an appraisal of the evidence of P.W.s 1, 2, 4 and 7 found that they were at material divergence. The injuries sustained by the victim were also not found compatible with the allegations. In the light of entire materials on record learned trial court found that charges have not been proved to hilt. This court does not find any patent illegality in the consideration of the matter by the learned trial court meriting interference. The application is dismissed. PN (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)