^, f'f1 lyLE of.v G:..<T(^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI SGARH AT BILASPUR (C. G.) ^:.^. PETITIONER WRIT PETItION^IiO, Gs /.^ /2 O 07 Padum. Kumar Sahu, •fri t^ .••" ./ -••'' -•*^' ^^y .riA rt-:^ It&SPONDENTS VERSUS ^-^ ^ . %''^/2 </~\^* ^ /^?:<y /• S/o. Shri Thahdaram Sahu Aged aklOut 40 years, Presently wcirKi.ng as As s i stant Teacher, T. W. P. , Gov&; - Higlier , : Secondary School, Pali, District Korba, (C.G.) State of Cbhattisgarh, Through the SeGretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner, Triba.1 Deveiopment Department, Kcirba District Korba(C.G.) Districfe Education Officer, Korba Dtstrict Koirba fG.G. ) Principa.1, •::.:•.•.' ••^.^•:i^ Goyt. B®ys' Higher. ;. Secondary Sehoi&I,,, T.W. P. , Eali,1 KcirBa, Z.1 Distriet Korba (G .^G. J WRIt PETITION UNDER ARTICLE <^' • 226/2f7 OF, THE CONSTITUtION OF INDZA FOR ^ISSUANCE QK^^ITi INi^^^ NATURE OF CERTIORAiU,^ Mairo^^ OTHER , SUITABLE WiCTT ,OR.^^^ DIRECTION OR DIREGTIONS fr^t-^L^ t-nT^^^m^e ,<5t MISHCQURTOFCHHATriSfiARHATBILASPUR WP.fSINe. 815 of 2007 Petitioner : Padum KuniarSahu Versus Re^aondents : State of Chhattisgarh and others SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J Present: Mrs. Fouzia Mirza. Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Dwiyedi, Ponel Lawyer for State/respohdents. OR DER ./~. ^ If (Passedonthis 12Tn &oyofFebruary,2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitionei* submits that the 1 question of law involved in this petition is governed by the Circular dated 20-1-1987. The t-tigh Court of Madhya Pradesh in Indraveer Singh Tomar ys. State of M.P. and others has considered the isaie and disposed of -the said matt'er in foltowing terms:- Pare2 "..................... In view of this submission advanced by Counsel for parties, this petition isdisposed of by 9iying following directions. The reqaondent No. 1 shall consider petitioner's representations referred to above and dispose of the same at an edrly date, prefer-ably within a period of 3 months from the date of communication of this order in accordance with law, keeping in mind the circulars issued by State 6ovt. as also the directions giyen by -the Tribunal in similar matters." ^ .ii;(*. 'v- 2. Leamed counsel oppearing for the parties would jointly submit and admit that this case, being Similar in nature, issquarely covered by the decision of the Madhya Pradesh 1-ligh Court in the case of Indniveer Singh Tomar (Supra). 3. In view of aforestated reasons, this petition is disposed of in the sanie terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 2004(2) tt.P.H.T.3(NOC) Subhash ^^•^^.^^U-iM.