IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.4807 of 2010 Date of Decision : March 17, 2010. Ravinder Singh Gill .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Bhim Sen Sehgal, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks a mandamus to direct the respondents to promote him to the post of Senior Assistant w.e.f. August, 2008 and grant him the consequential benefits. The petitioner is said to have served the respondents with a demand notice dated 7.9.2009 (Annexure P-3) but the same has not been responded so far. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the same with a direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to take cognizance of the above-mentioned demand notice dated 7.9.2009 served on behalf of the petitioner and decide the same by passing C.W.P.No .4807 of 2010 2 a speaking order as early as possible, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. March 17, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE