rg> HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT 'BILASPUR W.P. Art. 227 No. 7625 OF 2010 PETITIONER: K11 Saroj Singh Binii aged 53 years, daughter of late Shxi Preetam Singh Birdi, resident of Q. No. E.W.S. -2, Janta quarter, Nehru Nagar, Bilaspur, tahsil and dis11ict Bilaspur (C.G.). (Appellant) VERSUS 1. Harpreet Singh Birdi, aged 15 years, son of late Shri Raj Kumar Singh Birdi ah‘as R.P. Singh Birdi, minor, through natural guardian, the mother, Smt. Raviuder Kaur, resident of C.H. 581, Tatibandh, Raipur, tahsil and district Raipur (co). 2. Divisionai Manager, C.G. Forest Development Corporation Limited, Kéta —Pandariya Project Division, Mangla Road, Bilaspur (C.G.). Commissioner, O$ce of the Regional Provident Fund, Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS: (Respondentg WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (SB :Hon’ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:- Shri Somnath Verma, Advocate for the petitionerr Shri Akhil Agrawal, P.L. for the State/respondents No. 2 8s 3. None for the respondent No. 1. ORDER (Passed on 29/11I2011) 1. By this petition n/nderkzAriicle. 227 of the Constitution of India petitioner has challenged the legality and propriety of the order dated 23/ 10/2010 passed by First Additional District Judge, Bilaspur C.G. in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 4/ 09. 2. After some aiguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that revisional remedy has been provided under special law i.e. under Section 384(3) of the Indian Succession Act, which shall prevail over general law i.e. (Section 1 15 of the C.P.C.) themfore he $ @5 EXEC §§ i 6%; k S€eks to Withdraw this petition with liberty to approach mvisional forum. 3. Prayer. allowed‘ 4. Consequently, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. No order as to costs. 5. Certified copy of the order impugned be returned to the leaxned i counsel for the petitioner on his submitting duly attested photostat copy of the same. i , a V Sd/— , j T.P. Sharnga 7 Judge .._/’\ 7_ g-g g ?