1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2778 OF 2011 (Suresh Rambilas Malani and others vs. Ajam Ali Walayat Ali and others) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri R.L. Khapre, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri A. Mardikar, Advocate for the respondent nos.1 to 4. Shri P.V. Bhoyar, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent no.5. -------- CORAM : R.M. SAVANT, J. DATED : JULY 20, 2011 The above petition takes exception to the order dated 13/4/2011 passed by the Additional Collector, Akola whereby the order dated 20/10/2008 passed by the Naib Tahsildar and the possession receipts dated 29/3/2011 and 30/3/2011 issued to the petitioners pursuant to the precept came to be stayed. The petition also challenges the order dated 4/5/2011 passed by the Additional Collector, Akola whereby the Application filed by 2 the petitioners in respect of tenability of the Revision Application and review of the order granting stay came to be rejected. In the course of hearing of the above petition for admission, the learned Counsel Shri Mardikar, on instructions of the respondent no.2, who is personally present in the Court, submitted that his clients would be satisfied if the Revision Application filed by the respondent nos.1 to 4 before the Additional Collector is directed to be disposed of within a particular time frame. In view of the said statement of Shri Mardikar, both the impugned orders, as aforesaid, are set aside and the Additional Collector, Akola is directed to hear and dispose of the Revision Application filed by the respondent nos.1 to 4 within four weeks of the parties appearing before him. The parties to appear before the Additional Collector, Akola on 25/7/2011 at 3 p.m. In view of the statement of Shri Mardikar, no detailed reasons have been given for setting aside the impugned orders. Needless to say that the contentions of the parties in respect of partition that has been effected and 3 tenability of the Revision Application are kept open for being agitated before the Revisional Authority. The above petition is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE khj