IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. LPA No. 252 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 10, 2010 The Tauru Primary Cooperative Land Development Bank Ltd. …Appellant Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present: Mr. Kulbir Dalal, Advocate, for the appellant. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. The instant appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent is directed against the judgment dated 10.11.2009, passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP No. 11077 of 1995, dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant on the primary ground that the provisions of Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for brevity, ‘the Act’), have not been complied with. In concluding para 4 of the judgment learned Single Judge has declined the prayer of the appellant to hear the petition on merit once they have failed to comply with the provisions of Section 17-B of the Act. LPA No. 252 of 2010 (O&M) In the appeal the pleaded case now is that vide pay order dated 23.2.2010, which is obviously after the delivery of the judgment by the learned Single Judge, the provisions of Section 17-B of the Act stand complied with and they have become entitled to the grant of hearing of their petition on merit. Having perused the pay order dated 23.2.2010, we are of the considered view that the remedy of the appellant would be to move appropriate proceedings before the learned Single Judge with a prayer for prosecution of its writ petition on merit. Accordingly, we relegate the appellant to the remedy of filing appropriate proceedings before the learned Single Judge. Appeal dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (A.N. JINDAL) August 10, 2010 JUDGE Pkapoor 2