IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.132 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2733 OF 2005 Rajendra Chhotu Yadav ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Sanjay Prabhu i/b Mr.N.V.Bandiwadekar for Petitioner. Mr.A.H.Palekar, A.G.P. for Respondent 1 and 2. Mr.B.H.Phadnis for Respondent No.4. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. APRIL 28, 2006. APRIL 28, 2006. APRIL 28, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. It is not in dispute that representation has now been finally decided by the appropriate Officer. Whether the issues are answered in favour of the Petitioner or against, is not relevant for the purpose of present proceedings. : 2 : 2. As the representation has been finally disposed of, nothing survives for consideration in this Petition. The same is disposed of. Notice issued to Respondents is discharged. 3. It is once again made clear that it will be open to the Petitioner to challenge the correctness of the decision of the Officer by way of appropriate proceedings as may be permissible by law. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.