IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI TUESDAY, THE 23RD JUNE 2009 / 2ND ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 17313 of 2009(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. C.VENKITAKRISHNAN AGED 22 YEARS, RESIDING AT 27/140. THONDIPARAMBU MADOM, THAMARAMKULANGARA,NF GATE TRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM. 2. RAMSHAD T.V, S/O.ABDU RAHMAN, AGED 22 YEARS RESIDING AT THAZHEVADAKKEDATH HOUSE. CHEMMARATHUR PO, VADAKARA, CALICUT DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.MADHU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY CALICUT UNIVERSITY PO, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY SC SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).17313/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioners are the students of MES College of Engineering, Kuttippuram, for B.Tech (Electronics and Communication Engineering) Degree Course for the year 2004-08. Apparently dissatisfied with the marks obtained by the 1st petitioner in three papers in the 6th semester supplementary examination, and by the 2nd petitioner in one paper in respect of his 4th semester supplementary examination, they had applied for revaluation. They are aggrieved that the result of the revaluation has not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of the B.Tech supplementary Examination, June 2008. Exts.P1 and P2 applications for revaluation are pending before the respondents. W.P.(C).17313/09 2 3. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to publish the results of the revaluation sought for by the petitioners, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment provided the applications for revaluation are in order and otherwise correct. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs