IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24006 of 2011 Raju Kumar son of Ghura Yadav, resident of village-Mauare Khaira, P.S. Baroon, District-Aurangabad. ..........Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. Guriya Devi W/o Raju Kumar, D/o Brahamdeo Yadav, R/o Village- Mauar, Khaira, P.S.-Baroon, District-Aurangabad, at present Kurma tola-Phulchandra Bigha, P.S. Jamhore, District-Aurangabad. ..............Opposite Party ----------- 02 12.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest, in connection with Baroon P.S. Case No. 16 of 2011 for the offences punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, is named accused in this case with allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. Submission is that petitioner still intends to resume and continue the matrimonial relationship with the informant with all due dignity and care, who is his one and only wife. To further, strengthen his intention an offer is being made to pay a sum of Rs 700/- (seven hundred) per month to the informant by way of interim maintenance, subject to any order on the point by the competent court. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, on the event of filing of an application before the court below, clearly stating such intentions as stated above, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- 2 (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Baroon P.S. Case No. 16 of 2011, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years of till disposal of the case, which ever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation or even on single default in payment, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Safik (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)