IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5026 of 2007 BANGALI SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 11.11.2009. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 23.11.2006, passed by the Collector, Patna in EC Case no. 1/2005-06 and also order communicated under memo no. 168/S dated 14.5.1997, issued by the SDO, Barh by which licence granted under the Bihar Trade Article (Licence Unification ) Order, 1984 has been cancelled. Grievance of the petitioner is that his licence has been cancelled by the SDO and by the Appellate authority without giving any reasoning. Learned counsel argues that in case the authorities were dissatisfied with the reasoning given by the petitioner in the show cause reply, they must state the reasons for disagreeing with the same. Learned counsel for the State submits that after giving show cause, shop licence of the petitioner has been cancelled. Having considered the submissions of the parties and materials on record, I remit the matter to the Commissioner, Patna Division to look into the mater and pass appropriate order after giving notice to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of with aforesaid directions. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J).