IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.20113 of 2010 BRIJ NARAYAN YADAV S/O LATE BASANTI YADAV R/O VILL. JARARA, P.O. KENNARPATTI, TAHSHIL, PADRAUNA, DIST. KUSHI NAGAR( UTTAR PRADESH) Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT OF BIHAR 2. THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, WEST CHAMPARAN 3. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND REFORMS, BAGHA, WEST CHAMPARAN. 4. THE CIRCLE OFFICER, MADHUBANI, DIST. WEST CHAMPARAN 5. RAMAKANT YADAV S/O LATE RAJBANSHI YADAV 6. RAMAYAN YADAV S/O LATE RAJBANSHI YADAV 7. BARAMA YADAV S/O LATE RAJBANSHI YADAV 8. KANHAIYA YADAV S/O LATE RAJBANSHI YADAV 9. PRABHU YADAV S/O LATE RAJBANSHI YADAV 10. SAHDEI DEVI S/O LATE RAJBANSHI YADAV 11. VISHWANATH YADAV S/O CHANDI YADAV 12. SHANKAR YADAV SON OF CHANDI YADAV 13. VAKIL YADAV S/O CHANDI YADAV ( RESPONDENT NOS. 4 TO 13 ARE R/O VILL-PARSAUNI TOLA KANKATHA BANKATAWA, P.O AND P.S. PIPARASI, DIST. WEST CHAMPARAN, AT PRESENT R/O VILL. JARAR, P.O. KINNARPATTI, P.S. PADARAUNA, DIST. PADARAUNA, UTTAR PRADESH. --- RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02 21.12.2010 Present application arises out of a Mutation proceeding. Petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 04.08.2010 passed by respondent Additional Collector, West Champaran in Mutation Revision case no. 180/2009-10, whereby the revision was allowed and order dated 04.11.1999 passed by respondent Deputy Collector, Land Reforms Bagha, West Champaran in Mutation Appeal no. 33/97-98 was set aside. The impugned order records as under:- ^^mHk;i{kksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa dks lquk ,oa nkf[ky dkxtkrksa rFkk fuEu U;k;ky; ds vfHkys[kksa dk voyksdu fd;kA Hkwfe lq/kkj mi lekgRrkZ cxgk dk vkns'kgd ,oa fgLlk ij vk/kkjhr gS tks fd jktLo U;k;ky; ds {ks=kkf/kdkj ds ckgj gSA 2 bl okn ds nkSjku gh mRrjoknh ds olh;rukek tks fd probate ugha gS dk Hkh vfLrRo izdk'k esa vk;k gS fcuk probate ds olh;r dk dksbZ otwn gh ugha gksrk gS tc rd fd og l{ke U;k;ky; ls probate ugha djk;k tk; lkFk gh mHk;i{kksa ds chp esa LoRo okn la0 633@04 Hkh l{ke U;k;ky; esa fopkjk/khu gS oSlh fLFkfr esa Hkwfe lw/kkj mi lekgRrkZ cxgk dk vkns'k fnukad 4-11- 99 dk vkSfpR; ugha jg tkrk gSA vr% mDr vkns'k dks fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA LoRo okn ds fu.kZ; ds vkyksd esa gh vxzsRrj dkjokbZ mfpr gksxhA vr% iqujh{k.k vkosnu Lohd`r djrs gq, bl okn dh dkjokbZ lekIr dh tkrh gSaA vkns'k dh izfr ds lkFk fuEu U;k;ky; dk vfHkys[k okil djsaA** In that view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to exercise its discretionary writ jurisdiction in the matter. The application is dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)