IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No.118 of 1991 ** For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA. ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? 1 to 5 : No -------------------------------------------------------------- SADHNA VIDYAMANDAL TRUST Versus CHHANUBHAI B PANCHOLI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR KB PUJARA for Petitioners MR RK MISHRA for Respondent No.1 (not present) SERVED for Respondent No. 2 GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent No. 3, 4 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA. Date of decision: 01/12/97 ORAL JUDGEMENT : Shri K.B. Pujara, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the parties to the dispute have resolved the dispute outside the Court by mutual settlement and an affidavit is also placed on record to that effect, which is taken on record. 2. In view of the above the petitioner does not press the petition. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as not pressed. Rule is discharge. No order as to costs. sca 118/91 -oOo- karim*