IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 29TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 10TH PHALGUNA 1929 OP.No. 35372 of 2001(J) --------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ SOUDA W/O. LATE SULAIMAN CHELLATHA, PLAMOOTTIL HOUSE, KUMILY KARA,. PERIYAR VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.JACOB VARGHESE SRI.G.GOPAKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT , SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KUMILI VILLAGE. 4. THE SPECIAL GRADE SECRETARY, KUMILI GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KUMILI. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BENJAMIN PAUL. THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: OP. NO.35372/2001 ORDER ON CMP. NO.57672/2001 IN OP. NO.35372/2001 DISMISSED 29.02.2008 SD/- KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS EXT.P1:- COPY OF THE GIFT DEED NO.372/72 OF PEERMADE SUB REGISTRY. EXT.P2;- COPY OF THE LAND TAX PAID RECEIPT. EXT.P2(a):- DO. DO. EXT.P2(b):- DO. DO. EXT.P3:- COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT EXTRACT OF THE PERIOD 1988-89 1992- 1993. EXT.P4:- COPY OF THE DECREE IN OS. 18/81 OF MUNSIFF'S COURT, THODUPUZHA. EXT.P5:- COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN AS. 32/93 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, THODUPUZHA. EXT.P6:- COPY OF THE DECREE IN OS. 28/88 OF MUNSIFF'S COURT, IDUKKI. EXT.P7: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN OP. 9992/91 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT. EXT.P8:- COPY OF THE TAX PAID RECEIPT DT. 21.5.2001. EXT.P9:- COPY OF THE NOTICE DT. 25.4.2001 ISSUED BY SECRETARY, KUMILY GRAMA PANCHAYAT TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P10:- COPY OF THE NOTICE DT. 28.4.2001 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KUMILY. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE tss KURIAN JOSEPH, J. --------------------------------------- O.P. No. 35372 OF 2001 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of February, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioner approached this Court aggrieved by Exhibits P9 and P10 in the matter of construction of a compound wall. According to the petitioner, she is the title holder in possession of the property where the construction is made, as per Exhibits P1, P4 and P5. Unless those are duly varied, there shall be no interference with the peaceful enjoyment of the property referred to in Exhibits P1, P4 and P5. This original petition is disposed of as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. smp KURIAN JOSEPH, J. O.P. No. 35372 OF 2001 J U D G M E N T 29.02.2008