[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. APPLN.NO.330 OF 2007 IN CRI.APPLN.NO.2053 OF 2005 Keshav Bendu Pitambare ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.N.N.Gavankar i/b Arfan Sait Advocate for Applicant Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh APP for State ... WITH CRI. APPLN.NO.355 OF 2007 IN CRI.APPLN.NO.2964 OF 2005 Deepak Mangal Bhoir ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.N.N.Gavankar i/b Arfan Sait Advocate for Applicant Smt.A.S.Pai APP for State ... WITH CRI. APPLN.NO.360 OF 2007 IN CRI.APPLN.NO.2965 OF 2005 Ramesh Tukaram Bhoir ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.N.N.Gavankar i/b Arfan Sait Advocate for Applicant [-2-] Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh APP for State ... WITH CRI. APPLN.NO.361 OF 2007 IN CRI.APPLN.NO.2966 OF 2005 Bhaskar Shirpat Bhoir ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.N.N.Gavankar i/b Arfan Sait Advocate for Applicant Smt.A.S.Pai APP for State ... WITH CRI. APPLN.NO.362 OF 2007 IN CRI.APPLN.NO.2967 OF 2005 Dyaneshwar Walku Bhoir ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.N.N.Gavankar i/b Arfan Sait Advocate for Applicant Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh APP for State ... WITH CRI. APPLN.NO.365 OF 2007 IN CRI.APPLN.NO.2969 OF 2005 Malhari Kaluram @ Baliram Bhoir ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... [-3-] Mr.N.N.Gavankar i/b Arfan Sait Advocate for Applicant Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh APP for State ... WITH CRI. APPLN.NO.366 OF 2007 IN CRI.APPLN.NO.2970 OF 2005 Bharat Sambhu Vishe ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.N.N.Gavankar i/b Arfan Sait Advocate for Applicant Smt.A.S.Pai APP for State ... WITH CRI. APPLN.NO.372 OF 2007 IN CRI.APPLN.NO.2934 OF 2005 Krishna Deu Bhoir ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.N.N.Gavankar i/b Arfan Sait Advocate for Applicant Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh APP for State ... WITH CRI. APPLN.NO.396 OF 2007 IN CRI.APPLN.NO.2968 OF 2005 Pandit Keru Pitambare ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent [-4-] ... Mr.N.N.Gavankar i/b Arfan Sait Advocate for Applicant Smt.A.S.Pai APP for State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : OCTOBER 24, 2007 DATE : OCTOBER 24, 2007 DATE : OCTOBER 24, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicants and the learned APP for the State in all the above matters. The applicants were granted bail in C.R.No.I-96 of 2004 of Kalyan Taluka Police Station by this Court. 2. When bail was granted, one of the conditions imposed on the applicants was that they shall not enter Thane District during the pendency of the trial except for attending the Court cases on the specified dates. Thereafter, by order dated 29.6.2006, the applicants were allowed to enter Thane District for a period of sixty days. Thereafter, pursuant to various orders passed by this Court, the applicants were granted relaxation of the said condition till 31.3.2007. Now the applicants are seeking that the said condition may be deleted. [-5-] 3. Mr.Gavanekar, the learned advocate for the applicants states that during this period viz. from June 2006 till 31.3.2007, when the condition imposed of not entering Thane District, was relaxed no untoward incident has been reported. He, therefore, prays that the said condition be relaxed. As of today, the learned APP could not point out any untoward incident during the said period in relation to the applicants. 4. In this view of the matter, condition that "the applicants shall not enter into Thane District" is relaxed. On account of the said condition being relaxed, the applicants shall report to Kalyan Taluka Police Station henceforth till further orders. Rest of the conditions mentioned in the bail orders i.e. dated 28.3.2005 & 4.5.2005, are maintained. 5. Applications are disposed of. [SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.]