-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1209 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.1209 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.1209 OF 2006 IN IN IN SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.1292 OF 2004 APPEAL NO.1292 OF 2004 APPEAL NO.1292 OF 2004 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Mr.S.M.Sabrad for the Applicant Mr.Kishor Patil i/b Mr.P.N.Joshi for Respondent No.2-A CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: AUGUST 11, 2006. AUGUST 11, 2006. AUGUST 11, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Not on board. Taken on board. 1. A case for restoration is made out subject to complying with earlier order. The learned Advocate for the Respondent No.2-A opposes the restoration of the ad-interim relief on the ground that there are subsequent events. 2. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b) subject to the condition of the Applicant complying with requirement of filing compilation within a period of three weeks from today. -2- 3. Parties will maintain status quo as of today for a period of three weeks from today. The Respondent No.2-A will be at liberty to file reply to the application for interim relief. Judge. Judge. Judge.