1 300711 vgm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3007 OF 2011 Reshma Pakhandi Jaiswal ...Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. M.S. Singh for the Petitioner Mr. J.P. Yagnik, A.P.P., for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 Mr. Amit Shastri i/by M/s. Khilnani & Co. for Respondent No. 6 CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR AND R.G. KETKAR, JJ. DATE: NOVEMBER 30, 2011 P.C.:- The learned A.P.P., on instructions, states that F.I.R. has since been registered on the basis of statement given by the petitioner. In view of this development, the petitioner is not pursuing the present petition, with liberty to take recourse to other remedy as may be permissible in law, if and when occasion arises. 2 300711 2. The counsel appearing for respondent No. 6 submits that civil dispute is pending between the parties, and the allegations made by the petitioner are baseless. That is a matter to be investigated by the police officer. It will be open to respondent No. 6 to rely on all circumstances and material to justify his clam that the allegations made by the petitioner are baseless. We are not expressing any opinion on the correctness of the stand taken by the petitioner or respondent No. 6 on merits. All questions are left open. 3. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid. R.G. KETKAR, J. A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.