IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD JUNE 2009 / 13TH JYAISHTA 1931 Mat.Appeal.No. 289 of 2008 ---------------------------- OP.1554/2006 of FAMILY COURT, PALAKKAD .................... PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENTS 2 & 3 -------------------------------- 1. PADMAKSHAN, KALLIKKATTU HOUSE PARANATTUKUNNU DESOM, MALA, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. SUSHEELA, W/O.PADMAKSHAN, DO.. DO.. BY ADV. SRI.T.N.MANOJ SRI.V.VIPIN SRI.P.R.JOSHY RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER & 1ST RESPONDENT ------------------------------------------ 1. LEEMA, D/O.KUTTAPPAN KANDAMKULANGARA VEEDU, KUNDUKADU DESOM AYILOOR VILLAGE, CHITTOOR TALUK PALAKKAD DISTRICT 2. JIMMI, S/O.PADMAKSHAN KALLIKATTU VEEDU, PARANATTUKUNNU DESOM MALA, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK. ADV. SRI.T.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR FOR R1 SRI.M.H.HANIL KUMAR FOR R2 THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER ON I.A. NO. 10852008 IN MAT.A. NO. 289/2008 DISMISSED. 3-6-2009 SD/-R.BASANT, JUDGE SD/-M.C. HARI RANI, JUDGE TRUE COPY P.S. TO JUDGE R.BASANT & M.C. HARI RANI,JJ ============================== MAT. APPEAL NO. 289 OF 2008 ============================ DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE 2009 JUDGMENT Basant,J. When this matter came up for hearing today, it is reported by counsel for the appellants and the counsel for respondent No.1 and respondent No.2 that all outstanding disputes have been settled in terms of the compromise which is narrated in detail in I.A.No.1301/2009. The parties pray that the compromise may be accepted and this appeal may be allowed modifying the impugned decree in terms of the settlement reported in I.A.No.1301/2009. 2. The request is accepted. This appeal is allowed. Joint compromise petition shall form part of the appellate decree. R. BASANT, JUDGE M.C. HARI RANI,JUDGE ks. WPC. 2