'«; ^ ^o-' ,,\-A ^7^?^"; <5^'w ^bs^>% 1 's?-''"\ ^.•••"" -^^"1 ^' ^- e^' .->'' y~ >..••-' ' ^•"" IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO. ^&M /2006 C-l PETITIONER^: 1. Sarvajanifc Vitran Pranali, ^ Jagamathpur, Fair Price Shop, Jaearnathnur Block - Pratapapur, Tahsil-pratappur,District- Surguja, (C.G.) Through: Salesman, (Authorized By - Manager) Krishna Gupta, S/o Shri Awadesh Sao, Age about 32 years R/o Village - Jagamathpur, Distt - Surguja, (C.G.) VERSUS tac RESPONDENTS: -^ ^(^^ o^^ ^^ ^^°' ?^ <.^s V ?y / 1 State of Chhattisgarh, Through-.The ^ Secretary,Department of Food Public Distribution and Consumer Protection, Manta-alaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) 2 Collector, Surguja, ^ District: - Surguja, (C.G.) 3. Sub-DivisionalOfficer, Pratappur,,/ District: - Surguja, (C.G.) Ife1. WRIT PETITION UNDER^ AR'HCLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIA'GE WRIT. OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORAm AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS^ SG. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILAS .9 (Ll f.P.(ClNo.4820/2 ^ PETITI Sarvajanik Vitran Pranali, Jagarnathpur, Fair Price Shop, Jagarnathpur, Block - Pratappur, Tahsil - Pratappur, District Surguja (C.G.5 Through : Saiesman (Authorized by Manager) Krishna Gupta, S/o Shri Awadesh Sao, Age about 32 years, R/o Vitlage - Jagarnathpur, District^ Surguja (C.G.) Consumer 2. 3. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretsry, of Food and Protection, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) Collector, Surguja, Surguja(C.G.) Sub-Divisional Officer, PratapDur, District Surguja (C.G.) Present: Shri A.N. Pandey, Advocate on behaif of Shri Jltendra Shrivastava, Counss! for the petitloner. Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Additional Advocate Genera for the State. 'he foltowing order of the Court was passed by 2 Padma Qt Shri Kishore Bhaduri, learned Additional Advocate Genera! submits that as ail the issues raised in thls writ petition have already been finally deciaed vide order dated 09.03.2007, passed in W.P. No.5265/2006 and other connected petitions, now nothing survives for decision in this writ petition. 2) Shri A.N. Pandey, leamed counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the above facfuai situation now prevailing in the case. 3) The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. 4) Consequently, the stands vacated automaticaily. Sd/- ChiefJustice interim order dated 05.09.2006 Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge