IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. No. 7258 of 2011. Decided on: 31.08.2011. Anuradha Jarial. ….. Petitioner. -Versus- Union of India and others. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner. : Mr. Dushyant Dadwal, Advocate. For respondent No. 1. : Ms. Anita Dogra, Advocate vice Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India. For respondents No. 2 and 3. : Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral): The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “It is therefore respectfully prayed that the present petition may kindly be allowed and the respondents may kindly be directed to produce the letter of intent, which has been issued to the respondent No. 4 contrary to the terms & conditions of the advertisement & policy & guidelines in an illegal, arbitrary & unconstitutional manner as also against the principles of natural justice, which may please be quashed & set-aside, keeping in view the averments & submissions made hereinabove, by issuing a writ of certiorari, which is quite illegal, arbitrary & has been issued in her favour contrary to the selection 2 procedure & police & guidelines, with the further directions to the respondents to produce the complete record, pertaining to the present case.” 2. Petitioner has submitted Annexure P-4, complaint. There will be a direction to the 3rd respondent to look into the complaint filed by the petitioner, with notice to the petitioner and 4th respondent and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. This shall be done within a period of one month from the date of production of a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition before the 3rd respondent by the petitioner. Petitioner will also serve a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition to the 4th respondent immediately. The allotment granted to the 4th respondent will be subject to the decision thus taken by the 3rd respondent. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Copy dasti, on usual terms. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. August 31, 2011. (bhupender/K. Attri)