IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4655 of 1994 Mahanth Nalanda Giri, Chela Sahto Giri Math Akorha P.S. & Anchal Sheo Sagar, Dist. Rohtas --- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The joint Director Consolidation (H.Q.) Bihar Patna 3. Deputy Director Consolidation, Rohtas. 4. Consolidation Officer, Sheo Sagar Anchal, Rohtas. 5. Munni Singh Head Master, H.E.School Akorha, P.S.& Anchal Sheo Sagar, Rohtas. ---Respondents. ----------- 11 27.04.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent no.5 are present. Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Upadhyay submits that two advocates had filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the petitioner. One of them, namely, Hariji Upadhyay is dead and another counsel, namely, Shiva Nand Pathak has shifted his practice to Jharkhand High Court. This Court on 04.05.2006 passed the following order:- “Mr. Kameshwar Prasad Gupta, learned Standing Counsel No.5, and Mr. Yogendra Kumar appearing for respondent no.5 are present. Mr. Om Prakash Upadhyay learned counsel is present and submits that one of the previous counsel is no more and the other counsel has shifted his practice to the Jharkhand high Court. He, however, submits that he will try to obtain instructions in the matter and file duly executed vakalatnama on or before 26.6.2006. Put up under the heading „For Orders‟ in case learned counsel is unable to file vakalatnama on behalf of the petitioner. 2. This matter shall be taken up for admission along with C.W.J.C.No. 2121 of 1994.” Mr. Upadhyay submits that in spite of his persuasion 2 he has not been provided with Vakalatnama on behalf of the petitioner. Accordingly the application is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sym (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)