Cri. Apln. No. 2280/2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2280 OF 2011 1. Sow. Shamal w/o. Rajdendra Puri, R/o. Bamaniwadi, Tq. & Dist. Osmanabad. 2. Sow. Santhosh w/o. Dattatraya Puri, R/o. Karepur, Tq. Renapur, Dist. Latur At present Chapoli, Tq. Chaqur, Dist. Latur. 3. Sow. Urmila w/o. Ram Puri, R/o. Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya School, Tuljapur, Dist. Osmanabad. ....Applicants. Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ....Respondents. Mr. N.D. Kendre h/f. Mr. S.Y. Patil, Advocate for applicants. Mr. S.G. Nandedkar, APP for respondents. CORAM : T. V. NALAWADE, J. DATED : 24th June, 2011. PER COURT : 1. This application is filed for anticipatory bail. Ad-interim relief was granted to the applicants on 6.6.2011 by this Court. It appears that by mistake it was mentioned in that order that entire application is allowed. Today both the sides are head. APP has made papers of investigation available for perusal. 2. The crime is registered on the basis of report given by the father of the deceased. He has made allegations that demand of Rs. two lacs was Cri. Apln. No. 2280/2011 2 made by the husband and his relatives. Present applicants are the sisters of the husband. In the past one crime was registered under section 498-A read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and after that compromise had taken place. The deceased was taken back to matrimonial house and during one month from the resumption of cohabitation, she committed suicide by consuming poison. Allegations are made that demand was made continuously and for that the illtreatment was continued. 3. For the applicants, the record is produced to show that they were given in marriage twenty years back and since then they are living separately and in different villages. The record in respect of two applicants is produced to show that they are employed and on the relevant dates they were on their duties. In view of these circumstances, interim relief was granted to them. 4. There is no record to show that when suicide was committed, these applicants were present in the matrimonial house of the deceased. In view of these circumstances, this Court holds that the application deserves to be allowed. So the interim order made in favour of applicants is confirmed by allowing the application accordingly. [ T. V. NALAWADE, J.] ssc/criapln2280/11