IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2664 of 2010 1.SHABNAM KHATOON wife of Ainul Mian 2.Darudan Khatoon wife of Ali Hussain Mian , both r/o village Bagahin,P.S. Pear, Dist. Muzaffarpur ……..Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 25.3.2010 Heard the parties. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Pear P.S. case No. 63 of 2009, dated 28.6.2009, instituted under sections 314, 302, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that according to the first information report itself petitioners are not alleged to have caused any injury to the deceased and specific allegation of assault is against co-accused Ainul Mian. Petitioners are said to be members of the mob and are said to have participated in the assault to the informant and his mother. By referring to annexure-2 series learned counsel for the petitioners submits that informant and his mother sustained superficial injuries and same have been found to be simple in nature. Learned counsel for the State has also not disputed the aforesaid submission. In the aforesaid back ground particularly in view of the fact that petitioners are ladies, , let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within - 2 - four weeks from today , be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Muzaffarpur, in the above noted case subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) M.Rahman