IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6148 of 2007 (O&M) Date of decision: 03.03.2009 Nirmal Kumar Jain, Advocate .............Petitioner Vs. Parul Modgil ............Respondent Present: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K.KANNAN, J.(ORAL) 1. There was no representation for the petitioner even at the previous hearing on 17.02.2009 and it was specifically posted for final disposal today since the matter related to a prayer for rejection of eviction petition under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. There is no representation today as well. 2. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution and default of appearance. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE March 03, 2009 Pankaj*