^. IN THE HISH COUHr OF JUDIC&TURE OF CHH&T2ISGAKH AI BIIASPUS PETITION BNDER ABIICLES 2Z6/2Z7 QJ' IHS CONS'riTBTION OF INDI& W.P. NO."L_/£^-OF 2001 PE'EITIONEE 2^* ,^^ ,<TA"-'b.-1'' ^s'^-' ..'r : .!••'' .C\' ..••'^<V"Q."-'l .••' - A '\<^ *v ..-.^^- ,^-y ^-^ &*-- SESPOl'IDEN'ES ^^y nMw f^p;^ ASHOK KUMAfi DUBEY S./D. Shri S&tya Sev Dubey Aged about 50 years, Journalist fi^o. K&tshora, Tahsil - Katghora, Distt. Korba (C.G.). Versus ^ /}; ^}. llaion! of India Actisg tlirough - Secretary Bepartin.eut of Eniri.roim.ent S. Forest, SoTt. of ladia, ,./ New Belhi. 2. St&te 6f Chhattisgsirh- Acting through - Secretary Forest Departnieat Qov^t. o£ Cbb.&'t'tisgsrh Sachifalaya, Bsipur (C.S.). 3. Birector Semer&l of Forests Sovt. of Chh&'fctisgarb Baipur (C.G.). . 4. CoBservetor of Porest Bilaspur Circle Bil&s-pur (C.Q.)' 5. B.ivisional E'orest Offlcer, Kor&a Si^tision Korba (C.Q.). 6. St&te of Madhya Pr&desii Actiag througii Chief Secretary V&ll&lah Bhawan, Bfa^op&l (M.P). Contd..P-2 tniUlflisa .2, PEri'EIOH UNDEB AR'EICLES ZZ6/£Z7 OP 'rffE CONSII'rHTION OF INDIA FOB ISSMNCE OF mNDEMOUS. TOIIS &ND_OE DIEECTIOBS TO THE BESPONDEBTS "IB—Lt • .. • \. . •: •..•.•^t,'''.::^^'!;;-. .•''':•• "••••• .. ^. '.' :": \':': .. .•'.'..•.' . • • ; •^HC'-22',^-'; •..:<^.^:,:''.. 3^-^l<<lcy<p»'(3<ais,^(s<'w'Hil<.' •.S^'^'-.ags $sa r.p< 'NQ^ 14 tffHW! ?hHld) STltCT^Rl STR'^I gn:ira7W?a JJS11! sii^^CTwafttT 4-9-2001 ShriK.A, Aasari, Advo, qipiferah •mIRif.^ isT3t tfiR3R ^r aTpgiT sili?T bate for the oetltj-oner. ShrJ. A.s. Sabarwar, Srj. Standing counsel for Union of India on advance dppy. Shri Oautam Bhaduri. C^svt. Advocate for State on advance copy. Heard learned counsel.l Learned counsel for th authorities conceraed are n the provisions of law and t S petltj.oner alleges that the ot acting in accordance wlth tiere'is violation o£ law. Counsel fca- t&e petiti^ner was polntedly asked as to whether the parties who ,{iave been arrayed as respondents have been served with^ioti'c^. Learned counsel for the A petitioner submlts that cert-ain objectlons were filed before the Sub-div.i.sional offlcec and D.i.visloa Forest Officer. Learned counsel for thf respondents also ralsed a question that no notlce or ^epresentatlon has been served •aaaanding justice. Having considered the Q case. mater.i.al on record. iif the Apinion of this Court. ends of Justice wlll serve. acts and circamstances of the if the petit-Loner is allowed to make representation to 4he respondeats along with a [^^feir tlL.. :...-.-_—jLL-.-_.-i.: XI-H8-22 ~^~ i^.^fP((eS,'i®^(ifB,^'^sW'S W.P. N0. 1451/01 "frt SffW^i •Pyiwa'l^l | ^PTN'Bl?? sn^t'^Rnwdfei ';"i:- ,. vl: -2- cooy of the petition and itjs annexures by Regd. A.D. within a month and the resdondents No. 1 and 2 to consider the same and decic^e as early as possible preferably withln four mcjnths fron the date o£ receipt of representation. obsert?ation Witb the above petition is disposed of at •qiFfeft3;t[P:Rif •?'fe^ i; aipati siit?T and directions, the [this stage. Seeura.fey d'epesifced ijE any be refynded accordj.ng to rules. j C. c. as per rules. • Sd/- ChiefJusticc Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [•^^fisra _^ ^x mi K