r ^y^ /' ^.^ ^..;:'^ %. '& 'M ^^^^" ^^^^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER DEFENDANT JUDGMENT DEBTOR RESPOKDBNTS PLAINTIFFS DECREE HOLDER W.P. (2271 N0. 4594/2010 Paiich Ram S/o Shri Guha Aged about 55 yeai's, R/o Village Jhaal, TahsU Beinetara District Durg (C.G.). VERSUS 1A 1B 1C 1D Lobhaa Smgh S/o Bishru Siagh, aged aboiit 40 years, R/o Village Jhaal, TalisU Beinetara, Distiict Durg (C.G,) (Dead) through his legal representative Rajesh Verma S/o Lobhaii Siagh, aged about 40 years Nagendra Siagh Vemia S/o Lobhan Singh, aged about 30 years. Both. are resident of viUage Jhaal, Tahsil Benietara, District Durg (C.G.). Srat. Anusuiya Bai W/o Ashok Verraa, aged about 42 years, R/o Village BeiTa, Tahsil Beiuetara, DistrictDurg(C.G.). Gtrija Bai W/o Shn Viaod Veroia Aged about 36 years, R/o ViUage Dunda, Tahsil Benietara District Durg (C.G,). Panvati Bai D/o Bishin, aged about 50 years, R/o village Kashal board, Tahsil Bemetara Distdct Durg (C.G.). Jainuna Bai D/o BishTU, aged about 38 years, R/o Village Telai Kuuda, Tahsil Benietara, Distorict Durg (C.G,). WRIT PETITION UNDBR ARTICLE 227 OF THE CQNSTITU'HON QF INDIA. (SB :Hon?ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Preseut:- Shri Saniir Siagh, Advocate for the petitioner. Respondents not noticed. ORAL- ORDBR (Passedon 18/08/2010) 1. Heard. 2. Order dated 20/4/2010 passed by First Civil Judge Class-2 Bemetai'a, Distiict Durg ui execution Case No. 95-A/91 whereby "'as^ ^ ^, ! . ^ 1""^ .^ %^.^ ^; ^^^^^' 4. ^ appUcation/objection of the petitioner/judgnient debtor has been disniissed perused. On ttie basis of oral agreement with the origmal decree holder present petitioner had filed the petition for dismissal of execution proceediag on fhe ground of fuU satisfaction this was deiiied by the legal representatives of origuial decree holder after appreciatmg fhe material Court below has dismissed the petition/objection of the judgnient debtor. Learaed Court below has not coinmitted aay illegality ui dismissiag such petition based on oral agreeinent tliat too relating to eviction decree, I do not find aay iUegaHty iii fhe order unpugned requiring aay iaterference, Consequently, this petition is Uable to be disniissed aad is hereby disniissed. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge