IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE Dated this the 18th Day of June 199o BEFORE THE H’BLE Rh. JUSTICE CHANDRASHEKARAIAH Between: 1, R,Basavaiah, S/o.Rangaiah, Aged about 48 years, R/at. 31, 1st Main Road, Thimmenahally, Bangalore — 560 040, 2. E.H.angajah, S/o.Honnappa, Aged about 43 years, No.56/i, Byadarahally, Viswaneedain Post, Banjalore — 560 091. 3, Hanurnakka, D/o . Late Honnappa, Aged about 52 years 1 No.22, 17th Cross, Agrahara Basarahally, Bangalore — 560 079. ...PET1TIONERS (By Sri.P.N.Nanja Reddy, dv.) And: 1, The Corporation of the City of 5 angalore, Reptd. by the Corniissioner, Hudson Circle, Bangalore—560 002. . . .2 —2— 2. anjalore Zevelopment Eutnority, by its Commissioner, sankey Road, Bangalore-20. . . .RESPuNDETS (By Sri.K.N.Puttegouda, Adv. for R—., Sri.R,.Hegde, Adv. for R—2 1 Sri.Vishnu D.bhat, Adv. for R—2) , , 4 4 hese rit Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to quash vide Annexure W0 X & Y dcited 9,12,971 b R-1 in respect of the petitioners only. These ‘b4Lit Petitions coming on for orders this day, he Court made the following:— C B The petitioners have challenged the endorsements dated 09,12.1997 issued b the respondent—Corporation in these rit Petitions. 2. The learned Counsel for the Corporation submitted that what has been challenged in these Writ Petitions are only the endorsements and not the oroer. further, he has produced the records to show that the Joint Comnissioner ot the Corpordtion has passed considered order cnsidering the contentions S 4 3 —3— raised by the petitioners on 01.12.1997. The said order has not been challenged. Therefore, no relief can be granted in favour of the peti tioners in these Writ Petitions. In the r suit, I pass the following order. writ Petitions are rejected. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to challenge the order of the Joint Commissioner if they are so advised. safr