IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2318 OF 2009 Dnyanu Bhau Chougale, Since deceased through heirs: A) Pandurang Dnyanu Chougale & Ors. ...Petitioners V/s. Dattatraya Keshav Bhandari ...Respondent ...... Mr.A.B.Borkar for Petitioners. None for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. MARCH 12, 2009. MARCH 12, 2009. MARCH 12, 2009. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the Petitioners. 2. The argument of the Petitioners that in view of the peremptory order dated 27th February 2007, the Defendant was expected to file additional written statement within eight weeks from the date of the said order. Having failed to do so, the Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the amended written statement. It is not possible to : 2 : countenance this submission. The fact that on the earlier occasion, Court passed peremptory order, does not preclude the Court from showing indulgence to the party especially when the matter is only with regard to amended written statement. It is not as if the Court has entertained original written statement after the statutory period. 3. In the circumstances, no interference is warranted with regard to the discretionary order passed by the Court below. Hence, dismissed. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.