^ ^^ HSGH CGURT OF Cl lliATTjSGARH AT BILASPUR Writ PetitSon (S\ No. 1 947 of 2008 Petltioners 1, 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Versus Respondents 1. 2. 3. 4. Ram Chand Sahu. S/o Late Shri KushaJ Singh Sahu, Age about 57 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Mankeshri, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) Sudama Ram Patel, S/o Shri Telsi Ram Patel, Age about 52 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Prsmary Schooi. Bagdor, Distt.-Kanker(C.G.) Dev Krishan Shav^mvanshi, S/o Shri Ramshran Shawarnvanshi, Age about 53 years, Asst. Teacher, Govt. Primary Schoot. Devgaon, Distt. - Kanker (C.G.) Smt. Rampyari Yogi. W/o Shri Durga Nath Yogi, Age about 50 years, ^stt. Teacher, Janpad Primary School, Sambatpur. Distt. - Kanker (C.G.) Raghu Ram Thakur, S/o Shri Ra. Thakur, ^e^about 52 years, Asstt. Teacher, G6vt. Primary School, Ghordda, Distt. - Kanker (C.G.) Arun Kumar Singh, S/o Shri Ramawadh Slngh, Age about 54 years, Assti. Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Bhanuprateppur, Distt. - Kanker (C.G.) Arun Kumar Yadu, S/o Shri Hari Ram Yadu, Age about 50 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Bhainsha Kanhar (du) Distt. - Kanker (C.G.) Smt. Shanti Thakur. W/o Late Shri Prabhu Sjngh Rajput, Asstt. Teacher, R/o Govindpur, Kanker, Djstt. - Kanker (C.G.) State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Education & Tribal Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner, Distt. - Kanker (C.G.) District Education Officer, Distt. - Kanker (C.G.) Treasury, Account & Pension, Distt. - Kanker (C.G.) WRIT PETtTOIN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONST1TUTION OF tNDIA Single Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnthotri, J. Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioners. Smt. Smitha Ghai, Pane! Lawyer for the respondents. I— 1.-^ 4. Thakur ORALORDER (Passed on this 1st day of Aprii, 2008) The petitioners were appointed jnitiaJly, on a fixed pay of Rs. 150/-. The petitioners were thereafter, granted regular pay scale on completion of the probation period. The question of law involved herein is, asto whether the petitioners are entitSed to regutar pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from the date of compjetion of probation period. Learned counsel appearing for the petjtjoners, as well as learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State, jojntiy submit that the facts and question of iaw, invoived in the present writ petition. are the same asto that of in W.P.(S) No. 813/2007 < Ram Kumar Sahu & others Vs. State Govt. of Chhattissarh & another),which was allowed vide order dated 12.2.2007. jn view of the above-stated submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the parttes, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms l.e. petitioners are entitSed for regular pay scate w.e.f. the date of initial appojntment, subject to verification of the facts. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge