IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1156 of 2009 1. Nageshwar Singh son of Haro Singh, resident of village Maldah, P.O., Maldah, District Munger 2. Lakhan Prasad son of late Bindeshwar Singh resident of village Rasalpur, Post Office Hathiawan, District Munger 3. Kishori Singh son of late Bajrangi Singh resident of village Mehush Post Office Mehush, Police Station Sheikhpura District Munger (Now Sheikhpura) 4. Ram Naresh Pandey son of late Ram Prasad Pandey, resident of village Mandanna, alias Manna, Post Office Manna District Munger 5. Birendra Kumar Singh son of Amir Singh, resident of village Kamta, Post Office Hathidah, Distt. Munger. 6. Sahdeo Prasad son of late Fakira Mahto, resident of village Mahadeobigha, Post Office Belar, Distt. Nawadah 7. Bhola Prasad Singh, son of late Ram Janam Singh resident of village Korma Post Office Gagaul, Distt. Munger 8. Ram Nandan Prasad Singh son of Indradep Singh resident of village Korma P.O. Gangaul, Distt. Munger 9. Ram Chandra Prasad Singh son of late Mahabir Singh resident of village Rasalpur P.O., Hathidah, Distt. Munger 10. Kheyali Mahto son of late Sahdeo Mahto, resident of village Korma P.O. Gagaul, Distt. Munger Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Sri K.K. Prasad, Deputy Secretary, Jal Sansadhan Wibhag, Prasakha (14), Patna 2. Sri Kamla Kant, the Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Kotari Hill Road, Gaya 3. Sri Rambilash Choudhary Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Anishabad, Patna 4. Sri Ajit Kumar Sinha, Executive Engineer, Water ways Division, Biharsharif 5. Sri Bijendra Kumar Ram, Superintending Engineer, Jalpath Anchal, Nawadah, Biharsharif ----------- 03/ 30.06.2010 In compliance of the orders of this Court dated 4.12.2007, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 6789 of 1993, case of the petitioners for regularization on the post of Moharrier was considered and rejected by the Superintending Engineer without taking into account the service rendered by them as seasonal employees and such fact is evident from perusal of the order of the Superintending Engineer, Water Ways Circle, Biharsharif 2 dated 4.7.2009, Annexure-D to the show cause filed on behalf of opposite nos. 1 to 5. This Court under contempt jurisdiction cannot consider the validity of the order rejecting the claim of the petitioners. Accordingly, the contempt application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to challenge order dated 4.7.2009, Annexure-D to the show cause filed on behalf of opposite nos. 1 to 5 in accordance with law by filing appropriate writ petition. Arjun/ ( V.N. Sinha, J.)