V. 3S 'EHE aJSSB. WSSil: OS^3TJBICKSVB.B AT BZLASPUR.iCHHMTISGARH HSI'i' PESCTZON HO.^?&OF 2001 EEICTIOHIR Ramesh Chandra Dubey s/o Ram Dulare Dabey aged 45 years, r/o Pandri-tarai, Raipnr (C«G) vsasus ,RESPONDBtn?S | ^f) ....•••^' ^sy'' ^ cv.-5y\ 1. State of Qihafctisgarh through Secretary^ Bepartment of Hoae Affairs, Mantralaya, Raipur 2. Colleetor, Raipur (C.G) PETIII0N _ONDBR ARTICLE 23fi OF THE CO.HS'rEPUriON OF INDIS, POR ISSU&NCB OF t®ITIH IHE _H&TgKE OF CBRTIORARI MAHD&MUS PROHrBIIION_AI®O'mER SUITAB&E WtIS. •fS.IES. DIRECTZQN_SB' DIRECTIOHS. CRDER OR ORDSRS. m^nm-r^xuT.An o n&„^fflLIEk—13^'T*— rpTFiMTP'O ^ & ff eUr^.Tn ^n _fchfit 4- NINttTWtfI^ ^s[ «yi<<i<'i<i, Qfll+i're, fsi<niyj,< W.p. No. 838/2001 sn^r XR?' (•ic)t-i<«i«i) sil^I^iiftihr ^PEFT 5?|i^T ^^icft ^ 'staraT ^ifct anta 28/6/2001 Shri Manindra Shrivafe peU.tloner. • ^ Shr-i Ranvii- Singh, li^arned G.A. fbr :res?ondent/State Heard. O R Maint^nance The.order of detentj-An writ petitioner ynder cert^. Black- Marketing and Commodities&ct, 1980. The as the writ petitioner has impugB.ed order was issued 4 has been avpiding arrest b^ prevent the Competent &uth4 order_of detention aforesa. th^re Mr. Manindra Shrivast petltioner submits that for issuanee of impugned or writ petitioner. It is als ssarily there ought to be soon after detention is mage ttii<i?<ri<iT'f *ii+i<nf'^ ^s^t <^i<^i< ^affipTsn^i tava, learned cdunsel for the D E has been issued aoalnst the iln provisions of prevention of of Suppliss of Essential said order. is yet to take effect not been detained till date. The >n.4/4/2001. Tbe writ petitioner ' filing this.writ petition'to' .. >rity to act on: the basis of th e -d. ava. l^rned counsel for the are no si-ifficient materials der of detention against the o further submitted that nece- n Aidvisory Board inasmuch as and the^^^^-..Xs-feaS?:n^, s-^S^^Jt. GRPRI—FS/350—12/2000—50,000. -t T XI-HC—78 SIT^I^I K;-fi°b WIT an^t **<i+ <sxci '<<i<<i<"i-4, ®iily<i<o,[s|cll'Ll^< ^iWWI <»iHiq! •TFI,200 sn^i'ci^E' (' y) TOITWHfTO 311^1 i& conclustLon into custoay, the matter i^ Advisoty Board which Will findtng to the Detaining A[ Board comes to the materials for fletention forwarded to the Detaininql the order of detention wou|ld would be set at liberty. there is no such-Advisory ant3 of Chhatt.i.sgarb, ^feherefor|s ~^ forijm detained, there is no can be referred to for exajmination petitioner has approached of powers under Article 2^ matt Mr.. Ranvir Singh, 1 that though as on this da^) been constituted, such ma1|. Principal Secretary of has been clearly mentionec^ maklnq tt clear that the •fi; tfiis remedy. Mr. Hortie ^t^[(Ti<fli ~f^^i ^ f^st' <P^'^.i< ^r3fftCT 311^1 required to be .referred to ^xamine In turn and give its Lithority. Once the Advxsory that there are no suffici'en ffsfl^L such findingjwd-i;]. duly be Authority and in such a situation be revoked and the detainee p^ccordj-ng to Mr. Shrivastava; iBoard in existence in the State |e, once thevrit petitioner 1s to whlch his order of detention Hence, the wrifc- |this Gourt directly for exercise 6 of theConstifution of In&ia. terned G.&. for the State submits , no Advisory Board as such has .er can be Feferred to the Department an3 this fact in'the ader of detention itself, a'it -oetitioner is entitled SS5& .- Shrlvas+ava, learned counsel for oetitloner ^. ^^ '•:!TPTRT!T, ®Trl<H+ls, fs«»ll'Hy,< "^200 a'li^T'^^ ('^3^?) 311^1 W R-ti* ^T 3?f?^T ^»l^^i ^CTwateisn^r Wlf^pfhT •WWTfif 1sczt TfsR^IT ^3jfiCT3n^[ submits that such Authocity relevant grovisions of lav.| On perusal of orderoj 1-earned counsel representin^ that -by'approaching this Co>t sedting rSlSef to the effec' shoiild be prevented from talf the w'rit peti.txoner is enti' detention once he tias been 4 of detention. AS statea abd detention is served uoon thi he 'is detalned, 'tbe entlre to the &dvisory Board which 1s not contemplafced under detention and after hearing the parties. it j.s clear ,rt, the i»T-it petitioner is 'that the order of detention ing its effect. in my view, its findina to the Comoeten ^^•5--p(yA^A< the final ori3er/ by the Comp report from the Advisory Bo4rd this Gourt. Shri '-Maiaindra Shrivasl led to challenge the order of ietained as a resu.it of the orde: ^ve, ss soon as the order o£ wnt petitioner and as a result njiatter shall again be referred |in tur-n will examine and aive Authority. If aggrieved by jtent Authority, on receiot of , the petitioner may aporoach ipetittoner submlts that til; "Ui;U<"~ [Board/ia'ar-3e'angfituted in thi: |that if ftdvisory Board whicl- .|ava, learned coun sel for the date, there -^ no Advisory regard. I shall make it clear is reqaired under Drovisl.ons of GRPRJ—FS/350—12/2000—50,000. T" XI-HC—78 sn^r^i R;-< TOT SfRW i»>H!t> ^~5T '<11<<l<n<4, 0Tll-H<IS, Ts)c1iy^< sn^r'q^^' (• y) wnw^ifCTsn^i r .—..•• .^A/.^^.._ ., is not^ existence, the tute such Advisory Board i: clear that because of non-i writ petitloner shall not filed pn behalf of the Sfa have been taken. It is no all these averments and.gi vlew the merits .of the cas Caurt comes to the conc-Lus entertained for hearing un' of India. In. the present the opinion that the matt® cscamj.uo—.the—mQrl:of-ti' "7, In the facts and cir petition is dj.sroissed. consequent to the order of writ petitioner,shall have the duly costituted- Adviso _^A^C(-v conteiTplated unSsqi^^f^^ express aray opinion as to Governmoit that the matter 'lil'lfi't'fl-) 'qpRif 'i? ^VS tfa*$l< ^aifgirsiT^r 'tate Governmait shall constl- i|nmed-tately. I shall also make l.t |existence of Advj.sory Boa,'"d, the-; pe made to syffer. In th6 rep-ly |fce Government, various averments |fc neeessary for me to enfeer Into 'e findi.ngs thereona as in my can be examlned only when this .on that the: matter shouldbe erArtlcle 226 of the Constitut.lon pacts and ciccumstances, I am of is pre-mature^ <®e—Lhl-s Ct^ctrL—bo /lr- O LiL.i (.ToAk i|:umstances aforesaid, thj.s'.<"^t the vri.t petitioner be detained Shibuld detentj.on issued on 4/4/2001 , the being remedy of..thl.s matter/referred to •y Board. at the earliest as is ^ provisions of; law. l do not ^hether tb.e .cpntention of the State can :be refecred to Principal ..5 '3^i"!iwi8fl?i(,.i'^ftwi®,,'fi<ci ty<.^ ^(Netia»ttlt*» 3ii^ 'CH^^'jc(i3«i<y;f); aiAa w R-<i* ^T 33I3^f 8E»*tte{) "^*-;; Secretary. Home Dgoartmen t. A copy of this order Sovernment of Ghhattisgarh, *l<|ts«jl'lHWftl'flft'^ <E*l«EK ^TaiRssn^t • ^ be sent to the Chj.ef Secretary, Raipur, for immedlate aetJ.on. Sd/- Ouef Justice -A^ K J-f-