BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the First day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.9672 of 2011 1. S.ANBUSELVAN 2. S.RAVI 3. O.SARAVANAN 4. V.P.DEIVENDRAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. T.IQBAL Advocate For Respondent : A.RAMAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN CRIME NO.27 OF 2007 ON THE FILE OF THE RESPONDENT POLICE. The petitioners/Accused apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 120B, 406, 408, 384, 419, 448, 420 & 506(ii) of IPC in Crime NO.27 of 2007 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that a false case has been foisted against the petitioners in crime No.27 of 2007 on 19.08.2007 under Sections 120B, 406, 408, 384, 419, 448, 420 & 506(ii) of IPC and there is a Civil dispute and the petitioners are entering into a memorandum of understanding in respect of running of hotel and it is the case of Civil nature and they apprehended for arrest and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged occurrence took place between 15.07.2006 and 24.07.2007 and Rs.1.25 crores has been given and investigation is going on and in FIR, two person's names were mentioned and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and considering the fact that the alleged occurrence took place between 15.07.2006 to 24.07.2007 and complaint has been given on 19.08.2007 and even though the case has been registered on 05.07.2011, the petitioner neither interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain condition. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Magistrate No.I, Dindigul and executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the court concerned daily at 10.30 am., until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C Scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. sd/- 01/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I,DINDIGUL 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,DINDIGUL 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. T.IQBAL Advocate SR.No.25415 GH : 03.08.2011 : 2p/6c ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9672 of 2011 Date :01/08/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/