1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT No.1387/2009 Kanakia Spaces Pvt.Ltd.. ..Plaintiff -VERSUS- Joist Developers Pvt.Ltd. And others. ..Defendants ............... Mr.P.K.Samdami, Senior Counsel a/w Ms.Shweta Menon, Advocate i/b M/s Wadia Ghandy & Company, for the Plaintiff. Mr.Dhiren Shah i/b Vimla & Company, Advocate for the Defendant No.5. Mr.Prafful Satra, Director of the Defendant No.5 present. ............... CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 17th June, 2009. PC:- 1 Not on Board. Mentioned. 2 The praecipe has been moved by the Advocate for the Plaintiff/Decree Holder certifying the satisfaction of decree on receipt of a sum of Rs.45 Crore by Demand Draft dated 16th June, 2009 drawn on the Bank of India. The Advocate for the Plaintiff so also the Advocate for the Defendant No. 5 have signed the praecipe which records the payment of a sum of Rs.45 Crore by the Defendant No.5/Judgment Debtor to the Plaintiff/Decree Holder towards full satisfaction of the decree. The Advocate for the Plaintiff has certified the receipt of the entire decreetal sum and full discharge and satisfaction of the decree. The praecipe submitted by the Advocate for Plaintiff and the Advocate for Defendant No.5 is taken on record and marked as “X” for identification where under the Plaintiff/Decree Holder has certified the satisfaction of decree. 3 In that view of the matter, the Registry is directed to record the satisfaction of decree as contemplated by Order-XXI Rule-2 of the Civil Procedure Code. JUDGE kps