tTTI ^SJ. WRIT PETITION (S) No. 3504 of 2007 NARESH C.HANDRAKER, S/o Shri Shatmghan Lal Chandraker, Age about 37 years, Oceupation- Service as Shiksha Kanni Verg-II, Presently Posted at govenmient Higher Secondary School, Ganaud, Vikaskhaiid - Aaraiig, Distt: Raipur [C.G.] VERSUS : 1. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Through the Seeretary, School Education Departiiient, DKS Syilding, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Tiie Secretary, Paiichayat & Social Welfare Department, D.K.S.Building, Raipur [C.G.j 3. The Collector, Raipur, Distt: Raipur [C.G.] 4, DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, Pension Bada, Raipur, Distt: Raipur [C.G.] 5. •C.R.Devansaa, Sesior Shikshak, Goveniment Higli School, Garioud, Araiig, Distt: Raipur ^VKH PETmON LTNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTTPJTION OF INDIA Preseat: Shri Sunil Sahu, .Advocate fbr the petitioner. Sliri Arvind Diibey, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents 1 to 4. •'11 (Passed on 25m day of June, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner Sta-i Naresh Chaadraker workine as Shiksha Karmi Grade II, vide order dated 19.02.2007 (Ajmexure P/6), was assisned the charge 'ofPriacipal, Goveniment High School, Ganoud, on temporary basis till fdrther order Tliereafter, by order dated 18.05.2007 (A-mexure P/7), the additional charge sranted to fhe petitioner was withdrawn aad fhe same was haaded over to the senior most teacher S'ffl'i C.R.Dewansan Crespoadent No. 5) oj the Govemment High School Ganoud. 4, ieing agarieved, tfae petitioner faas filed this petitioa on the ground that the impugned orda- dated 18.05.2007 is discriminaton' as the petitioner is teaching higher elasses. Be that as it may, the petitioner has not acquired any ri^t to fhe post of Principal as he was assisnsd ttie additional charge to look after the vaeant post ofthe Priacipal ofthe concemed school. It was clearly stated in the order that fhe assigmiient oftbe additicaial charge \vas temporan' and uitfil ferther orders till any otlier officer joins the oSace. By the impusned order, the semor most teaeher has been given the charge of Priacipal of High School Ganoud, may be he is teaching lovver classes. Oa the basis of teadiing ofclass, one does aot get seniority aad this is also not the case of the petitionerthathe is seniorto Shri C.R.Dsvangan. In view ofthe foregoiag, lliere is no merit ia tfais case. Tlius, tbis petition is dismissed, summarily. Sd/- . ., SatishKAgniIiotri , Judge , Anat ¥-