1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 1528 OF 2007 (Sanjeev Kumar Chandan .v. Mahatma Gandhi Antarrashtriya Hindi Vishwavidyalaya & ors) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri F.T. Mirza, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.C. Dharmadhikari, Advocate for the respondents. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. 20TH NOVEMBER, 2008 Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Perused the record. Though the petitioner had made allegations against the Vice Chancellor, the respondent No.3, we find from the petition that the petitioner has not produced anything on record which will show that the alleged recommendations of the enquiry into the affairs of the University was made on the basis of the complaint of the petitioner. There are also no allegations in the petition which will show that the lady involved had any reason to make false allegations against the petitioner at the behest of Vice Chancellor. In our opinion, unless there is a compelling reason, a lady student will not involve herself in such 2 murky affairs. In such enquiry, really speaking, in order to avoid embarrassment to the female student concerned, according to dicta of the Supreme Court, even principles of natural justice need not be followed. But, in this case, the principles of natural justice had also been followed. This is the matter of discipline in the academic institution. The Supreme Court has said that the interference by the Court with the maintenance of the discipline in academic institution should be very rare. Considering the nature of allegations, in our opinion, it will not be appropriate to interfere in the matter. The writ petition is, therefore, rejected. JUDGE JUDGE *rrg.