IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 9334 of 1999 Between: B.Lokeswara Rao S/o Venkat Reddy, R/o Nunna, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Dy. General Manager, State Bank of Patiala, Zonal Office, Arcade, A-13, World Trade Centre, Cuffe Phase, Mumbai-400 005. 2 The Branch Manager, State Bank of Patiala, Vijayawada, Krishna District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the proceedings of the respondents vide No.DBM/M/1828 dt. 16/9/97 on the file of the Res.No.1 and consequently direct the respondents to re-instate the petitioner with all consequential benefits, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.VENKAT REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: MR.G.DHARMA RAO The Court made the following Order: Since none appeared for the petitioner on 26-02-2008, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, neither the counsel for the petitioner is present nor is there any representation on his behalf. Hence the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. ____________ 27-02-2008 usd ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Dy. General Manager, State Bank of Patiala, Zonal Office, Arcade, A-13, World Trade Centre, Cuffe Phase, Mumbai-400 005. 2 The Branch Manager, State Bank of Patiala, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 3 Two CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VEENA}