IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5547 of 2004 BRAJ KISHORE SINGH, SON OF LATE SHIV NANDAN SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RAJKHAND (TOLA- RAM NAGARA), P.S. AURAI, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR --- PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MUZAFFARPUR, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR. 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MUZAFFARPUR, DISTIRCT MUZAFFARPUR. 4. THE CIRCLE OFFICER, AURAI, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR – RESPONDENT IST SET. 5. SRI JAI MANGAL RAI, 6. SRI KAPILDEO RAI, 7. SRI GANESH RAI, ALL SONS OF LATE BHAIYA RAM RAI. 8. DHARAMCHAND RAI, 9. JAWAHAR LAL RAI, 10. KRISHNADEO RAI, ALL SONS OF SRI JAI MANGAL RAI, 11. BRAJ KISHORE RAI, SON OF KAPILDEO RAI, 12. RAM KALASH RAI, SON OF LATE RAJAN RAI, 13. SUJINDRA RAI @ Ram SHOBHIT RAI, SON OF RAK KALASH RAI, ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RAJKHAND, P.S. AURAI, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR. RESPONDENT 2ND SET. ----------- 3/ 25-03-2011 Heard the parties. The grievance of the petitioner is that some land (identity not disclosed in the writ petition) situate at village- Deoki Bujurg, in the district of Muzaffarpur, is a public land and has been encroached upon by the private respondents, whereas according to the respondents, the lands in question were purchased by them through some valid documents. On the enquiry initiated by the Circle Officer also lands in question was not found to be a public land. 2 On the basis of material on record this Court finds that petitioner is trying to settle his private dispute with private respondents by showing the lands belonging to them as public land, which on enquiry was found not to be correct. This Court does not find any merit in the present writ petition. It is, accordingly, dismissed. BTiwary/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)