IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36134 of 2010 BHUNESHWAR YADAV, SON OF LATE RAM SWAROOP YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAHRO GORAIYA, POLICE STATION ISLAMPUR, DISTRICT-NALANDA. …..Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …..Opposite Party. For the Petitioner : Mr. Md. Sufiyan (Adv.) For the State : APP. ----------- 02/ 06.10.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner’s prayer for bail was rejected earlier with liberty that he may renew his prayer for bail in the court below if the informant in course of trial does not support the allegation. The case has been registered under Sections 392, 376 of the Indian Penal Code. From the impugned order it appears that the informant and other witnesses have been examined and the case is pending for examination of the investigating officer and the doctor. The informant has supported the case. The petitioner has been identified by the informant. Considering the earlier observation and also that the informant has supported the case prayer for bail of the above named 2 petitioner is again rejected. However, the trial court is directed to expedite the conclusion of the trial. kksinha/- (Shyam kishore Sharma, J.)