IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 28262 of 2008 Between: Mamidi Bhavani, W/o. Mamidi Appalanaidu, Sarika Grampanchayat, Vizianagaram Mandal & District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Panchayat Officer, Vizianagaram District, Vizianagaram. 2 The Divisional Panchayat Officer, Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned order of the 1st respondent in Rc.No. 1367/2008/A2, dated 11-12-2008 in so far as suspension of cheque power of the petitioner who is the sarpanch of Sarika Grampanchayat, Vizianagaram Mandal, and District even before enquiry is conducted is illegal, unconstitutional and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the impugned show cause notice of the 1st respondent in so far as suspending the cheque power of the petitioner as null void in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.JANARDHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following : O R D E R : On the last occasion, when the matter was taken up for hearing, none appeared for the petitioner, as such, the matter was adjourned to this day under the caption “For Dismissal”. Even today, when the matter is called, none appeared for the petitioner nor is made any representation on her behalf, and it seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for default. No costs. _______________ N.V. RAMANA, J. 3rd June, 2009. bcj