IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.2409 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision: January 25, 2010. Naranjan Singh ...Appellant v. Kato Devi ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Shri R.P. Singh Ahluwalia, Advocate for the appellant. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): The only point raised before this court by the appellant was that the lower appellate court has decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiff- respondent without adverting to the plea of limitation raised by the appellant before the said court. From the perusal of the record, it was found that no such plea was raised before the lower appellate court. However, on the basis of the contention raised before this court that plea of limitation was specifically raised by his counsel before the lower appellate court, the appellant was directed to file an affidavit of the counsel who represented the appellant before the lower appellate court. Today, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has submitted that the appellant is not in a position to file such an affidavit. In view of the aforesaid facts, I find that the plea raised by the appellant is without any basis. Thus, no substantial question of law arises in this appeal. Dismissed. January 25, 2010. [ Rakesh Kumar Garg ] kadyan Judge