FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. CONTINUATION SHEET No. CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE. SIDE. SIDE. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 29 OF 2005. Tarun R. Rathi ..Petitioner. vs. State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. ------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office : Memoranda of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s orders appearnaces,Courts’s : orders or directions : and Registrar’s orders. : ------------------------------------------------------------ Ms. Pallavi Ashar holding for A.M. Saraogi for the petitioner. Shri A.S. Shitole, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.M.KANADE,J. V.M.KANADE,J. V.M.KANADE,J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 28-2-2005. 28-2-2005. 28-2-2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the application for discharge which is filed by him in the trial Court has not been decided so far. Offence is registered against the petitioner under sections 467, 468, 471, 420 read with section 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The said offence is a cognizable offence and application filed by the petitioner being under section 245 of the Cri.P.C., the trial Court should consider the application on merits and decide the same as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within a period of 2 months. Needless to state that if any adverse order is passed, the petitioner will be at liberty to take appropriate proceeding against the said order. Certified copy expedited. ------