v^^^? F" ^'•U~r^^^ ^£ ^ ^•1^. ^' i.'^r • n fyiiQ^Sffy.;; e^L...a^-,-••;; >^Q Page No, ^^^•••- ^^/OT>, pses^- _jj^.'- &a-!"" 1N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.1 W.P.No.........lf..':^..^....../2006 PETITIONER: Harishankar Chauhan S/o Shri Dhaniram Chouhan, Aged 48 year's Working as L.D.T. (Education Department) at Govt. Higher Secondary School, Kotba, R/0 Kotba, Tahsil - Pathalgaon, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) PONDENTS ^Mw^\ f/ \!:. VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretaiy Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. District Education Officer District Jashpur (C.G.) 3. Collector, Jashpur Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 'ETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/.a3^ OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORAm ETC. OR DIRECTION/ORDER OF LIKB NTURE ETC :- HI6H COURT OFCHHATrt56ARH AT BILASPUR Singl®Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. A9nihotri. W. P. (5) No. 6853 of 2006 Petitioner : 1-larishankar Chauhan Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & others Present: 5hri Rahul Jha, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Sovernment Advocdte for the respondents/State. ORDER )th O'assed on 12T"day of December, 2006) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner aibmits that the facts and questions of law involved in the present petition are squarely covered by the order dated 1.9.2006 passed by this Court in W.P. (5) No. 4725 of 2006 (Amar Sai Ram vs. Stnte of Chhattisgarh and others). 2. Learned counset appetiring for •the reqiondents does not dispute the facts, as stated by the petitioner. 3. Thus, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 1.9.2006 passed by this Court in W.P. (5) No. 4725 of 2006 (Amar 5ai Ram vs. State of Chhatt'isgarh and others). No order as to costs. Subluish Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge