IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4434 of 2011 DR.TRIBHUWAN SINGH, SON OF LATE MUNI RAM SINGH, RESIDENT OF 42/1, NEW PATLIPUTRA COLONY, BORING ROAD, PATNA, P.S. PATLIPUTRA, TOWN & DIST. PATNA. ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE MAGADH UNIVERSITY, BOTH GAYA, DISTRICT GAYA, THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, MAGADH UNIVERSITY,BODH GAYA, DISTRICT GAYA. 3. THE FINANCE OFFICER, MAGADH UNIVERSITY, BODH GAYA, DISTRICT GAYA. 4. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIATE, PATNA. 5. THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. ... ... RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 10.3.2011. Heard Shri Purushottam Kumar Jha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Shri Vikas Kumar, learned A.C. to learned Advocate General appearing on behalf of respondent nos.4 and 5/State of Bihar and also learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.1 to 3/Magadh University. The petitioner, who retired as University Professor, Department of Psychology, A.N. College, Patna with effect from 31.1.2002, has prayed for a declaration that the petitioner is entitled to get his pension revised in view of Government Resolution No.820 dated 2 23.9.2009 and he is entitled for merger of 50% Dearness Relief on his basis pension. It was submitted that the point involved in the present matter has already been settled in C.W.J.C. No.3616 of 2010 ( Dr. Himanshu Bhushan Vs. Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University and others) and other connected writ petitions, which was disposed of on 3.12.2010. The petitioner has also prayed for other reliefs. The writ petition is being disposed of in terms of Annexure-2 i.e. order dated 3.12.2010 passed in C.W.J.C. No.3616 of 2010 and other connected writ petitions. The petitioner is further granted liberty to file appropriate representation before respondent no.2 i.e. Vice Chancellor, Magadh University within a period of six weeks from today for redressal of his remaining grievances. If such representation is filed, respondent no.2 is required to examine the same pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. In case of refusal, respondent no.2 is 3 required to pass a speaking order within aforesaid time. With aforesaid observation and direction, the petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)