IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND JUNE 2010 / 12TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 11516 of 2010(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ANISHAD.A., S/O.ABDUL SALAM, ANVAR MANZIL, KOOTTUKUNNAM, KOLLAYIL, KOLLAM (DIST). BY ADV. SRI.LIJU. M.P RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, THULASI HILL, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REP.BY SECRETARY. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY SECRETARY, PUBLIC RELATIONS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE UNDER SECRETARY-IV, GOVERNMENT WING (RECRUITMENT), KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.ALEXANDER THOMAS,SC,KPSC FOR R1,3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.11516/2010 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1 : COPY OF NOTIFICATION ATED 12/11/2007 PUBLISHED IN THE WEBSITE OF R1. P2 : COPY OF EXPEERIENCE CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER. P3 : COPY OF LETTER DATED 16/03/2010 ISSUED BY R1 TO THE PETITIONER. //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE. jg ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.11516 of 2010 (L) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 2nd day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T In response to Ext.P1 notification inviting applications for the post of Translator (Malayalam), the petitioner applied producing Ext.P2 certificate to the effect that he has worked as a Translator. However, his application was rejected by Ext.P3 stating that the experience certificate did not meet with the requirements of Ext.P1. It is challenging Ext.P3, this writ petition is filed. 2. In paragraph 2 of the affidavit filed on behalf of respondents 1 & 3, it is stated thus:- “Further it is submitted that in the light of the appeals received from the candidates, the Commission have decided to re-examine the experience certificates of candidates including the petitioner and the applications of candidates who are found eligible on such re-examinations will be admitted for the selection.” From the above, therefore it is evident that the Public Service Commission is reconsidering all cases including that of the petitioner. Therefore, recording the above submission and directing that WP(C) No.11516/2010 -2- the matter shall be reconsidered duly adverting to the contents of Ext.P2 certificate produced, and leaving open the contentions of both sides, this writ petition is disposed of. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg