IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9966 of 2008 HAKINA KHATOON Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR A& ORS with CWJC No.10138 of 2008 GAYATRI DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.10490 of 2008 DROPADI DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.10491 of 2008 DINESH PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.10764 of 2008 UMESH CHANDRA CHAUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.10928 of 2008 BASUDEO PRASAD SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.11217 of 2008 CHANDRIKA DUTTA MISHRA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.11311 of 2008 SHRINANDAN MISHRA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.11418 of 2008 DHARICHHAN THAKUR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.11597 of 2008 BAIJ NATH GOSAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.12203 of 2008 CHANDRA DEO PRASAD SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.12215 of 2008 VISHAMBHAR TIWARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS - 2 - with CWJC No.12297 of 2008 BINOD MANDAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.12307 of 2008 DWARIKA SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.12440 of 2008 SHRI HARI DAMODAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.13026 of 2008 DEOKI NANDAN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.13279 of 2008 DEOKANT SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.13502 of 2008 BISHWANATH PRASAD GUPTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.13517 of 2008 SUDARSHAN RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 05.10.2010 Heard learned counsels appearing for the petitioners, the State and the Accountant General. The above writ applications were filed in the year 2008 however till date no counter affidavit has been filed and the payment of retiral dues are still pending according to the writ petitioners. Learned counsels appearing for the respondent- State submits that the claim of the respective petitioners shall be considered without delay as per law. - 3 - In the above circumstances, for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in these writ applications, concerned petitioners are permitted to file their separate representations before the concerned District Superintendent of Education/ District Education Officer/District Provident Fund Officer as the case may be with copy of the same to the Accountant General and the concerned Treasury Officer. In view of the above, in case such separate representations stating details of unpaid claims are filed by the concerned petitioners within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the concerned petitioners raised in their respective representations be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representations so that the grievances of the petitioners may be settled without delay and upon consideration the admitted dues if any may also be paid to the petitioners along with interest permissible under the rules. However, upon consideration if any of the claim or part of the claims are not being paid the same may be informed with reasons thereof and communicated to the concerned petitioners by post under registered cover. - 4 - All the above noted writ application stand disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)