IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1158 of 2010 Chinta Devi, wife of late Umesh Prasad, resident of Quarter No.10, Kaveri Bhawan, Purana Police Line, P.S.-Arrah, District- Bhojpur, Bihar. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. Smt. Pawan Devi, wife of Nathuni Prasad, resident of village-Mishrawalia, P.S.-Jalalpur, District- Saran, Bihar. 3. Sri Nathuni Prasad, son of Late Khekhar Raut, resident of village-Mishrawalia, P.S.-Jalalpur, District- Saran, Bihar ----------- 2. 26.08.2011 This revision application has been filed under Section 19 (4) of the Family Courts Act against the order dated 19.06.2010 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Chapra in Maintenance Case No.102/07 that the petition for maintenance against the petitioner is maintainable under Section 22 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The main grievance of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 had three sons, out of them, one died. Petitioner is the wife of the deceased son. Two sons of the opposite party are alive and they are also able to maintain their parents, but they have not been made the party in that proceeding for 2 maintenance. Considering the facts and circumstances, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. The petitioner is at liberty to raise her grievance before the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Chapra. This revision application stands disposed of. V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)