1 S.B. Cr. Bail Application No. 3948/2007 (Vajeng Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 20.08.2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr. P.R.Mehta for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, P.P. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and public prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and challan papers. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that it was deceased herself did not want to live with the husband and that was the cause that she was brought back by some of her family members and therefore, she committed suicide along with a child of two and half years. I have carefully gone through the statement of Nathulal brother of the deceased as also statements of Megji, Ratan Ji, Lala etc. From the statements of witnesses recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. as also the FIR, it appears that the deceased was subjected to cruelty on account of demand of dowry not only once but continuously. She was ultimately forced to bring Rs. 50,000/- else why should she not die. It appears that on account of continuous harassment in connection with 2 demand of dowry more particularly on non-fulfillment of demand for a sum of Rs. 50,000/-, she was asked why should she not die. In this view of the matter, I do not find it a fit case to release the petitioner on bail. The bail application filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is therefore, dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp