IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-27443 of 2009 Date of decision : 5.10.2009 Binder ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present: Mr.K.S.Dhaliwal, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he was not arrested from the spot and his co-accused is his father- in-law. It is further contended that the quantity recovered is non- commercial which was in fact stocked for personal consumption. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the considered opinion that noticing the fact that the petitioner has been prima facie found to be involved in the commission of offence under the NDPS Act, there is no reason to grant him the concession of anticipatory bail especially when no material has been shown from where false implication can be inferred. Hence the petition is dismissed. In case the petitioner makes a regular bail application before the court of competent jurisdiction, the same shall be Crl.Misc.No.M-27443 of 2009 -2- considered and disposed of preferably within a period of one week. 5.10.2009 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss