IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 21042 of 2008 Between: Mrs. R.Vijaya, W/o. Guravaiah, R/o. 1-101/2, Gudem Village, Dandepalli Mandal, Adilabad District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Endowments Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 Deputy Commissioner, Endowments Department, Warangal Zone, Warangal. 3 Assistant Commissioner, Endowments Department, Adilabad, 4 Manager, Sri Satyanarayana Swamy Temple, Gudem village, Dandepalli Mandal, Adilabad District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Orders or Orders by declaring the inaction of the ﬁrst respondent to pass any orders in the Revision Petition ﬁled by the Petitioner herein and to declare the order No.139 in O.A.No.156/2008 dated 25-8-2008 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Endowments Department, Warangal Zone ordering eviction of the petitioner from the subject property bearing H.No.1-101/2, admeasuring 242 square yards in Sy.No.226 of Gudem Village, Dandepalli Madnal, Adilabad District, is illegal, without any right or jurisdiction, without proper notice and violative of principles of natural justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.V.KRISHNA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following ORDER: The petitioner challenges the order, dated 25.08.2008, passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Endowments, Warangal Zone, the second respondent herein, in O.A.No.156 of 2008. An extent of 242 square yards of land owned by Sri Satyanarayana Swamy Temple, Gudem Village, Dandepalli Mandal, Adilabad District, the fourth respondent herein, was under occupation of Sri Ramidi Satish, the son of the petitioner. The husband of the petitioner and the father of Sri Ramidi Satish, by name Guravaiah, was the lessee. At the instance of the Temple, proceedings under Section 83 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act 30 of 1987 (for short ‘the Act’) were initiated by the second respondent. Through the impugned order, the second respondent directed eviction of the son of the petitioner. The petitioner states that the site in question belongs to the Government and she is in possession of the same for a long time. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Endowments and the learned Standing Counsel for the fourth respondent. A perusal of the impugned order discloses that a lease existed in favour of the husband of the petitioner in respect of the site in question. As a successor, the son remained in possession. As required under law, proceedings under Section 83 of the Act 30 of 1987 were initiated. Extensive discussion was undertaken as regards the nature of enjoyment of the property by the occupants and their predecessors-in-title. Ultimately, the second respondent directed eviction. It is not known as to whether the son of the petitioner had availed the remedy of revision. Not being a party to the O.A., the petitioner cannot canvass the correctness thereof. At any rate, this is not the forum. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:14.10.2008. kdl