iSB f '3-Tj BiF'S'Aff^ ^^^.r;3 ^) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. OF 2005 PETITIONER Yashpal Gupta, S/o. Late Shri L.N. Gupta, Aged about 62 years, R/o. Janiulbada, Polsay Chowk, Station Road, Durg (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Chief Secretary, Office situated at D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Secretary, Law & Legislative AfFairs Departinent, OfGce situated at D.K.S. Bhawan, Secretariat Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Secretary, District & Sessions Judge, Durg, Office situated at Durg, District Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA RESPONDENT .\^7/ ^y/ v /o^, / ^/^w 'y^y »<' 0?:%>y <^iy (?•* 3^'^TraRW, aTTi^'is, fsioi'yy 3T1^5Tqi *11NWI EhXIch ••••••••••••••"•—•• ^pj Sn^T^iT 'sn^r aitiwgfta' sn^r STtTrw gfw ^iFlfcTsfr-T qillcTr'^'fec£t; ^sri^q-sn^r pe'tjit 1 i.7.2005 Shri N.S. Dhurundhar, Shri Yashwant Singh State. By this petition the pe' of order dated 21.6.2009 application of the petiotion^r practice as Notary, Public The case of the appointed as Notary-Public 14.3.1991. Thereafer, the from time to time and petitioner moved an applicat^ion but the same was refused Learned counsel for thi raised in this petition has a vide order dated 24.3.2005 Chandra Prakash Sharma Vs. other connected matters Secretary, Law & Le9islativj Raipur have been quashed <)ounsel for'the petitioner. IThakur, 6ovt. Advocate for the itioner has questioned the legality (Annexure A-l) whereby the on^r for renewal of certificate to ^ been rejected. le^itioner is that initially he was \or a period of three years w.e.f. pe^itioner's certificate wois renewed ul|t-imat.ely, in the year 200>S the for renewal of his certificate impugned order. petitioner submits that the issue |ready been decided by this Court (^assed in W.P.No.3247/03 between State of C.6. S, others along with the orders passed by Oeputy '^ Affairs, 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh, id he is directed to consider the vicle aiid an applicatKins for renewal of certificate to practice as ar XI-HC-22 3ST ^||i||(»|^|, tSnfl'M'16, (elciwy ^K-iMraiWflfi' V^ 200 3TI^?T5fiT 'sn^r aiiiwgfer sn^rgTOTWwfN' ifirafefl^ WRif ff teczt d^RCTi: ^aif^Tsn^T ^ -2J-- Therefore,based on the order in question (Ai No.2 is directed to consid for renewal of the certifjj light of the above order With the '\direction disposed of. Certified copy as per nn^xure \he above order passed by this Court A-i) is quashed and respondent ^r the appliGation of the petitioner :ate to practice as Notary Public in by this Court. aforesaid, the petition stands pa|3sed rules. Sd/- 1-.C. Bhadoo