IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6163 of 2011 ANIL KUMAR YADAV @ ANIL YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 18.03.2011. Heard. The petitioner had been admitted to bail during the investigation. After submission of chargesheet and passing of order of cognizance, he did not appear which resulted into cancellation of his bail bond and issuance of warrant of arrest under processes under Sections 82 and 83 of the Cr.P.C. By making reference to 1982 BBCJ page 35 (SC) Legal Aid Committee, Jamshedpur Vrs. State of Bihar, it has been contended that the law does not require that the accused should remain physically present in making Pairvi prior to the submission of the chargesheet and it is required that as soon as the order of cognizance is passed the court has to ensure that the accused had noticed an information about being summoned. The petitioner did not have any knowledge that he was required to appear in the court below. Regard being had to the above facts and circumstances, let the above named 2 petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-III, Vaishali at Hajipur in Sessions Trial No.597 of 2002 arising out of Goraul P.S.Case No.59 of 2002. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha,J.)