IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 766 of 2005 Between: Dinesh Kumar Jain, S/o. R.S. Jain, Convener, I.E.s. Club, Members Welfare Association, R/o. Centricast Linings India Limited, P.25, Road No.10, IDA, Nacharam, Hyderbad - 500 076. .... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner, Cyberabad Police Commissionerate, Lakdikapool, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Station House Officer, Nacharam Police Station, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District. 3 Registrar of Companies, Koti, Hyderabad. 4 IES Club and Resorts, S.No. 44/12A, Adjacent to Nacharam Telephone Exchange, Nacharam, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not taking any action against the antisocial goonda elements who are creating nuisance and trespassing into the 4th respondent club premises by force and consequentially direct the 1st and 2nd respondent to initiate action against the illegal, antisocial goonda elements and protect the rights of the members of the 4th respondent club and resort and to pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.T.HANUMANTHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1&2: GP FOR HOME The Court at the admission stage, made the following : ORDER: The petitioner claims to be a member of the fourth respondent club. According to him, taking advantage of certain disputes in the management of the club, certain anti social elements are entering the premises of the club and the congenial atmosphere is getting spoiled. He claims to have submitted a complaint before respondents 1 and 2 and submits that no action has been taken thereon. He seeks appropriate directions in this regard. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Home. 3. Respondent No.4, of which the petitioner is a member, has got its own management. It is for the management of the club to ensure that congenial atmosphere prevails therein. If any untoward incident takes place, the management has to take necessary steps. An individual member cannot canvass the grievance, when there is a legally constituted management. The petitioner can certainly point out his grievance to the management, who, in turn, can move appropriate authorities. 4. Hence the writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to workout his remedies in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Dated : 2.2.2005 To 1 The Commissioner, Cyberabad Police Commissionerate, Lakdikapool, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Station House Officer, Nacharam Police Station, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District. 3 Registrar of Companies, Koti, Hyderabad. 4 IES Club and Resorts, S.No. 44/12A, Adjacent to Nacharam Telephone Exchange, Nacharam, Hyderabad. 5 2 CCs to G.P for Home, High Court Bldgs,Hyd. (OUT) 6 2 CD copies. RAR