fS Petitioner ResDondents 'ok—' £ K-;'-- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C. No,393 of2008 Sombhatt, aged about 35 years/S/o Shri Madanlal Bhatt, resident of Plot No. 648, StreetNo. 39, Sniriti Nagar, Bhilai, Distt. Durg (CG). VERSUS 1. State 6f Chhattisgarh through tlie Secretary, Departmcnt of Reveime, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur(CG);- 2. Municipal Corporation, Distt. Durg, fhrough its Commissioner, Bhilai, Distt. Durg (CG). 3. Buildmg Pemiission Oificer, I Miimcipal Corporation Durg(CG). 4. Smriti Grih Nirman Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, through its Pressident Smritil Nagar, Bhilai, Distorict Durg(CG). - i 5. B.C. Banchhod, son ofnot known, resident of 22/5, Nehiii Naggr, East Bhilai, District Durg (Chhattisgarh). (APPLICATION FORRESTORATION OF W.P. (C) No. 4848/2006) (SB: Hon'fele Mr. Satlsli K. Agmjiotri, J.) Presenf Shri T.K. Tiwari, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Shri Bhaskar Pyzzsi, Panel Lavvyerfprthe State. ORALORDER tW (Pa§§edon llulday ofDecember, 2008) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the coimsel for fhe petitioner could not appear on account ofboiiafide mistaike, fherefbre, W,P.(C) No. 4848/2006, which \'vas dismissed on 11.11.2008, may be restoredto its file. 2. Reasonable and suffi^ient cause has been shown. W.P (C) No. 4848/2006 is restored to the original file, subject to payment of cost of Rs. 500^ by the applicarrt, to the High Court Lega! Aid Committee. 3. A copy ofthis order be placed on record ofthe original petition andthe same be listed for hearing. 4. In view ofthe above, application for restoration is allowed, Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge ;S^:^^^SS^'3^^SS^|^S^S15I^^ ^^•sSy^^'y^i^^tth;!^^^