IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR THURSDAY, THE 12TH JULY 2007 / 21ST ASHADHA 1929 RP.No. 945 of 2006 -------------------------- TO REVIEW JUDGEMENT IN F.A.O.32/2005 Dated 25/01/2006 ................................. REVIEW PETITIONER/APPELLANT: ----------------------------------------------- POULOSE MEMORIAL FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES, VADANAPPILLY P.O., CHAVAKKAD TALUK, REPRESENTED BY V.P.DAVIS, PROPRIETOR, AGED 54 YEARS,S/O.POULOSE, VADAKETHALA OUTHOODAN HOUSE, KARAMUKKU DESOM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------------------- 1. V.K. RAJAN, S/O. LATE KESAVAN, VADAKKUMCHERY VEEDU, ENGANDIYOOR AMSOM, KUNDALIYOOR P.O., CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR. 2. P.K. RAVEENDRAN, S/O. KRISHNANKUTTY, PALLIKADAVATH VEEDU, ENGANDIYOOR AMSOM, KUNDALIYOOR P.O., CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR(CHELUR) THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: J.B.KOSHY & M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JJ. ------------------------------------- R.P.No.945 of 2006 in F.A.O.No.32 OF 2005 and C.M.Appl.No.1199 of 2006 ------------------------------------- Dated 12th July, 2007 ORDER Koshy,J . C.M.Appl.No.1199 of 2006 is a petition for condoning the delay of 240 days in filing the review petition. P.O.P. was filed with a petition to condone the delay of 1804 days. After detailed consideration, the delay petition was dismissed. Consequently P.O.P. was also dismissed. The above order was challenged in the first appeal. First appeal was also dismissed. The judgment in the first appeal is now challenged in the review petition filed with a delay of 240 days. Judgment was dictated in the open court and there is no reason for the long delay in filing the review petition. Hence, both delay condonation petition and review petition are dismissed. J.B.KOSHY JUDGE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE tks