DSPLA No. 4 of 2006 With CRMA No. 305 of 2006 Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. G.A. for the appellant/State. None for the respondents inspite of sufficient service. Delay Condonation Appl. No.305 of 2006 After going through the contents of the application and the affidavit, I am satisfied that the State has sufficiently explained the delay in filing the Government appeal. The delay in filing the Government appeal is hereby condoned. The delay condonation application is allowed. SPLA No. 4 of 2006 Heard on leave to appeal application. I have gone through the entire judgment and the evidence recorded by the trial court. The learned Addl. G.A. for the appellant/State contended that the findings recorded by the trial court are self-contradictory and there is an injured witness who has supported the prosecution version. After going through the entire judgment and the evidence as indicated in the judgment, I find that it is a fit case where the leave to appeal should be granted. Accordingly, the leave to appeal is hereby granted. As the delay has already been condoned the appeal be registered as regular appeal. Government Appeal Heard on admission. Admit. Issue notices to the respondents returnable at an early date. Summon the lower court’s record. Post after receipt of lower court’s record. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dt. : 28.08.2008 Shiv