1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3346 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 29454 OF 2003 Dr. Kanhaiyasingh Govindsingh Tehra .. Applicant Versus 1. Kailash S/o Kishan Kadam and another .. Respondents Miss. Asha D. Sherkhane, Advocate h/f Shri S. B. Talekar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs. Geeta Deshpande, Advocate for the Respondents No. 1 and 2. CORAM : N. D. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 05TH NOVEMBER, 2009. ORAL ORDER : 1. From perusal of record it reveals that, cost of Rs. 1,000/- was condition precedent for allowing the application for condonation of delay and the applicant was directed to deposit the cost within a period of four weeks from the date of order i. e. 10th July, 2009. Thus it is seen that, there is further delay of near about three months and as such no further extension is allowed. The order dated 10th July, 2009 is confirmed. The application for condonation of delay 2 stands dismissed for non compliance. For the reasons stated above the application for condonation of delay is disposed of. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] bsb/Nov. 09