IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 27047 of 2010 Date of decision: 02.12.2010 Surinder Kumar ........ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. P S Paul, DAG, Punjab for the respondent- State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) On 01.11.2010, the matter was adjourned as the Investigating Officer did not come present. Today, learned State counsel still prays for some more time as the Investigating officer is not present in Court. It is pointed that the son of the petitioner who was arrested on the same day but in FIR of even date for the same amount of recovery i.e. 60 kg. of poppy husk, has been released on bail vide order dated 27.10.2010 passed in CRM M 27089 of 2010. In this case also, the recovery of poppy husk is 60 kgs. which is slightly higher than the non-commercial quantity. He is in custody since 01.11.2009. Bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, SBS Nagar (Nawanshahr). (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 02.12.2010 mohan