bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.134 OF 2009 Shyamrao Narayanrao Mitra ..Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents Ms.Neeta Karnik for petitioner. Mr.V.S.Masurkar, AGP for respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & A.A.SAYED,JJ. DATE : 18TH SEPTEMBER, 2009 P.C. 1. Heard. Perused petition. 2. During the course of hearing, it is brought to our notice that, the pay fixation has been done by respondent No.2 somewhere in the month of April, 2009. Almost six months have been passed, however, no further steps appears to have been taken. 3. In the aforesaid backdrop, no doubt, the petition is practically worked out and the cause of action for the petition does not survive. However, so far as payment on the basis of working done by respondent No.2 is concerned, the same is yet to be received by the petitioner. Respondent Nos.1 to 3 shall take adequate steps to see that the payments are made to the petitioner within a period of four months from today. The respondent No.4 is also expected to coordinate in complying with the same. With these observations, petition stands disposed of. (A.A.SAYED,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)