IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.3803 of 2011 Date of Decision : March 03, 2011. Sukhwinder Singh Bhoma and another .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.S.L.Chander Shekhar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms.Monica Chhibber Sharma, DAG, Punjab. Mrs.Kamla Malik, Advocate, for respondent No.3. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Ms.Monica Chhibber Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1, 2 & 4 and Mrs.Kamla Malik, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.3. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no need to seek any counter-reply from the respondents at this stage. The short grievance of the petitioners is that notwithstanding the reservation of 10% vacancies in the public employment for the victims of 1984 Anti-Sikh Riots as provided under Clause 4 (iv) of the Policy of the State Government dated 24.12.1985 (Annexure P-5) as well as the C.W.P.No .3803 of 2011 2 Government of India policies dated 16.8.2005 and 16.1.2006 (Annexures P-7 & P-9), no such employment in terms of the aforesaid quota has been provided to the affected families in District Amritsar. To be precise, the petitioners allege that the Deputy Commissioner, Amritsar has failed to comply with the aforesaid Government policies. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, I am of the considered view that the issues raised on behalf of the petitioners are essentially the question of facts. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos.2 and 4 to consider the above noticed grievance of the petitioners and redress it in accordance with law by passing a speaking order and also by taking appropriate steps, within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. The respondents shall be at liberty to treat this writ petition as representation on behalf of the petitioners. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. March 03, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE