IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37476 of 2009 1. LALIT TANEZA S/O GOPAL KRISHNA TANEJA R/O SHOP NO. -52, PUSHPA MARKET , CENTRAL MARKET, LAJPAT NAGAR, NEW DELHI- 24 Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. MD. AYAZ HABIB S/O LATE HABIBULLAH R/OVILL TATARPUR, P.S. TATARPUR, DISTT- BHAGALPUR ----------- 2 18.12.2009 The petitioner’s grievance is that although cognizance was taken in the year 2000, there is nothing in the order sheet to indicate that in fact summons were validly served to him and process has been issued under Sections 82 and 83 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. I direct that the petitioner should appear in the Court below within a period of three weeks and take appropriate steps to do ‘pairvi’ in this case. In the mean time, the issuance of summons by order dated 22.4.2009 without proper notice to the petitioner in Trial No. 868 of 1999 arising out of Complaint Case No. 1109/99 pending before the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bhagalpur shall remain stayed. This application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. Sanjay ( Sheema Ali Khan, j.)