y. ^SinglBBench ^iSlieneto IN THE HIGH €QUm'_OF_]UD!CATURXT BILASPURfC.G.y MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL N0.^ 2006 APPELLANT /CLAIMANTS •<f RESPONDENT ,^ON-APPUCANT •^ y ^^Kumari Neha @ RashmiYadu D/o Late Dhanesh Kumar Yadu, Agetaboutl3years Appellant are represent§^by legal Guardian mother SmfrKanti Yadu, R/o M.I.G.-36 Housing Board Colony Kota Raipur, Distt. Raipur(C.G.) VERSUS 1. -^ Mustkeem @ Munna, Agedabout24years R/o Village & Post Silyari, P.S. Dharsiwa, . . Dlstt-Raipur(C.G.); 1 Smt. Akhtari BaiW/bWd. Rehman, R/o Village & PostSilyari, P.S. Dharsiwa, Distt.Raipur(C.G.) The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. By Divisional Manager Divisional OffiCe Kachahari ChowkJail RoadRaipur(C.G.) Goyerdhan S/o Tirith Nirmalkar, Aged about 31 years,R/o VillageMandir l-lasod,P.S.Mandirl-lasod, 1 Distt. Raipur(C.G.) ; Chawla RoadCareer, ' ' Bitaspur Road FafadiH Raipur(C.G.^ j NaBonalinsuranceCo.Ltri. ~ I By Dh/istonal Manager, NatienaB .Insyrance Co. 1-td., <a.E. Road, Ralpyr,' Distt.Raipur(C;.(3.) Miscellaneous Appeal under/seGtion 1:73 Motor Vehiele/sfett§88 "^ ^3. s^ 9->& ^ <=.. i'l m t'!i K':l l^il tPinrL^innriai^^ ^/ l-ho 1i i^nnnn^ .^- . .••' '^. ^nicicl-mTTT (3TRra?T? TT^) 3'sq'^ITZTRRT, aiTfl'l-l'Ko, Rlrtl'yy VW<?{\ *M|eb .^:A^...'&I?..i. an^r ws (ijcti.jsi^sr) SiI^T.WftFIW OTISIK^I *<41<* K M TCTWHto^ii^i - ?-.- .0.04.2007 Shri S.C.Verma, counsel for Sbri M.K.Bhaduri, Advocate ^.grawal, counsel for respondent Shri S.S.Rajput, counsel for Heari. on M.C.P.No. 1205/' jif delay ia fiiing fhe appeal ai t)referred with a delay of 51 1.3.04.2006. The reasons assigned for ^ippeUant did not have kaowledge However, the reasons assigi| IIL filing the application. is not sij (L205/ 2006 appUcation f6r condoi] Consequently fhe appeal| tmutation. |the appeUant. onbehalfofShri Saajay S. N|o.3. |respondent No.5. p006 application for condonation ^ the iastaat appeal has been P.ays . as per office note dated chi<iTn41TT "RTq^f ^f 'fe^ •(TW;^T< ^?3iRlHOT^I depay ia filing fhe appeal is tliat fhe lof limitation. jied by fh.e appellaiit for the deiay Ifficient and ttierefore M.C.P. No. (.ation ofdelay is rejected. is disniissed as barred by Sd/- \ Dhirendra Mishra; Judge GRPRJ— FS/246—2/2007 — 50.300.