WP 6538/11 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6538/2011 Bhagwantrao Yeshwantrao Jadhav V/s The State & others. _______________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | Shri A.S. Sawant, Advocate for petitioner. Shri V.D. Rakh, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3. Respondent no.4 served. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. Date: 15.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. Leave to amend. Though the notice was issued to the respondent no.4, who is duly served, none appears for the respondent no.4. As such, the allegations made in the petition being un- controverted are to be treated as admitted. It is the contention of the petitioner that though the petitioner, who is suffering from renal disease, has submitted the application to the WP 6538/11 2 respondent no.4 for grant of permission for transplanting, the same is not being forwarded by the respondent no.4 to the respondent no.3. In that view of the matter, we dispose of the petition by directing the respondent no. 4 to forward the proposal submitted by the petitioner to the respondent no.3 within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt thereof. Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. No order as to costs. (M.T. Joshi, J.) (B.R. Gavai, J.) Dt/- 15.09.2011 ndk/c1591114