IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1582 of 2010 MUKESH SINGH @ RAJEEV KUMAR son of Sudarshan Singh r/o village Masarhi, P.S. Gaurichak, Dist. Patna …Patna. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 10.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the informant’s tractor was taken away by the miscreants by providing intoxicant. None is named in the case for his having direct involvement. Owner of the hostel from were the victim driver was recovered is allowed bail along with one Chansu Kumar in whose confessional statement the name of the petitioner has appeared that also having no direct participation rather on telephone of the accused who was directly involved having in his possession or disposal of the tractor came to him but the confession of Chansu Kumar is not leading to recovery. The stolen tractor is traceless till today and nature of the case is of such that from every suspects different in nature of evidence can be collected including confession leading to recovery and identification by victims. I do not find it a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. However, the petitioner is directed to surrender and pray for regular bail. (Mandhata Singh, J) M.Rahman