IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER, TWO THOUSAND NINE CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.5107, 5113, 5122, 5160 and 5592 of 2009 CRP.No.5107 of 2009 Between: Sekharamantri Prabhavathi … Petitioner And Dadi Adinarayana (died) & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri N. Pramod for Sri C. Srinivas This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.5107, 5113, 5122, 5160 and 5592 of 2009 COMMON ORDER:- All these five civil revision petitions arise out of various interlocutory orders passed by the Court below. In the manner in which the revision petitions are proposed to be disposed of, it is not necessary to refer to the nature of these orders. At the haring, Sri N. Pramod representing Sri C.Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner, who is common in all these revision petitions, submitted that as the judgment and decree passed against the petitioner, who was judgment debtor No.5 in O.S.No.33 of 1984, has become final, the petitioner may be permitted to vacate the suit schedule premises and handover the vacant possession of the same by 1st February, 2010. The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to file an affidavit to this effect before this Court on or before 02.12.2009. In view of the submission of the learned counsel, the civil revision petitions are accordingly dismissed. The petitioner is permitted to remain in possession of the suit schedule property till 1st February, 2010 and shall file an affidavit before this Court to the effect that she will handover the vacant possession of the property in question to the respondents – plaintiffs on 1st February, 2010. If such an affidavit is not filed on or before 02.12.2009, the respondents – plaintiffs shall be free to enforce the various orders passed by the Court below, which are the subject matter of these civil revision petitions. As a sequel to dismissal of the revision petitions, CRPMP.Nos.7001 of 2009 in CRP.No.5107 of 2009, 7007 of 2009 in CRP.No.5113 of 2009, 7016 of 2009 in CRP.No.5122 of 2009, 7072 of 2009 in CRP.No.5160 of 2009 and 7640 of 2009 in CRP.No.5592 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief are also dismissed. _____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 27.11.2009 ES