IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.6547 of 1992 (O&M) Date of decision:11.11.2011 Pawan Kumar son of Sardara Ram, R/o 482, Mahesh Nagar, Ambala Cantt. ...Petitioner versus Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board, through its Chairman C-6, Sector-6, Panchkula, and others. ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Singh, Advocate, for Mr. Partap Singh, Advocate, for respondents 1 to 3. None for respondents 4 and 5. ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No. 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? No. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? No. ---- K.Kannan, J. (Oral) 1. This matter had been directed to be posted for hearing after the decision in CWP No.616 of 1992, by an order of the Division Bench on 20.08.1992. The Registry has pointed out that CWP No.616 of 1992 came to be decided along with CWP No.1465 of 1992 as early as on 02.01.1995 itself. 2. By the decision in the said case, the Division Bench has remitted the matter to the Chief Administrator of the Board, who Civil Writ Petition No.6547 of 1992 (O&M) - 2 - would examine the qualifications of every selected person and take a decision after being satisfied about the eligibility of the candidates. The selection process has been directed to be undertaken afresh through the aforesaid order. Nothing survives for consideration in the writ petition and the petitioner must have obtained a fresh consideration in the light of the direction given already by this Court in CWP No.1465 of 1992. 3. There is no representation for the petitioner. I have proceeded to examine this case on the basis of the records and with the assistance of counsel appearing on behalf of respondents 1 to 3. 4 The writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE 11.11.2011 sanjeev