K49 (LC (wk ,» IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHA’I‘TISGARH AT BILASPUR {C G) WRIT PE'III‘ION S) NO g§éu OF 2009 S B R P Achala S/o Late D R Achala ged about 34 years, Presnntly single Bench PETITIONER a ‘ posted as Tahsildar Saja, District Durg (C.G.). VERSUS ESPONDENT 1. The State of Chhattisgarh7 through The Secretary, Rajaswa Avam Aap‘da Vibhag, D; K. S; Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). G. L. Dhruv, Tahsildar, posted a . Disstrict ‘ Tahsi] Pithaura, Mahasamund (C.G.). WRIT PF'IITION UNDT‘R ARTICLL 2&6 OF THE (,ONS I‘HU l ION “ D RS t \ OI INIA WW Wm? W W '/1=I=[ 2007 mm (Wu) Wwm WW§WW agaifmm S B' HON’BLE .mSTiCE MR 9R§T§NKER mWAKER 17-07-20 9: Mr. MK. Bhaduri; counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Y.S. Thakur, Dy‘ A cate Genera! for the State. d o Challenge in the instant writ petition is to the order dated 30.6.2009 (Annexure P-1) pa sed by the respondent No.1 by which the petitioner who is w king on the post of Taheiider has been transferred from Tahsit S ja. Distt. Durg to Distt. Serguja on administrative ground. Counsei for the petition r submits that it is a case where respondent No. 2 has been accommodated in piece of the petitioner because earlier ai respondent No. 2 has worked in the same place as Nayab Ta siidar for about 8 to 9 years. He further submits that petitioner as not completed one year in the present piace of posting. but y t he has been shifted. Learned counsei for the State submits that let the oetitioner make a reoresentation before he reseondent No i and the same would be demoted in accordan e with law Accordinoiv the Writ oetition is disoosed of with a direction, l to tne oetitioner to file reorese tation to the authenties corcerned Within 10 davs from the date f receiot of coov o‘ this order the s same would be decided by th further period of three weeks fr: accordance with law. l J J ‘ / V Sd/ Pritinker Diwaker L a i‘tv Judge 1>l a authorities concemed within a rm the date of its receipt strictty in mm §fb m zoo mmqafiau) mmm mmm wwwifwm ammm -2:— $§1€mani¥1