IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 22573 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: September 23, 2010. Smt. Meman ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Haryana ...... RESPONDENT(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Surinder Dagar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh, A.A.G., Haryana. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No.142 dated 17.05.2010 under Sections 498A/325/406/506 IPC, registered at Police Station Ferozepur Jhirka, District Mewat. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. Coordinate Bench of this Court while issuing notice of motion on 06.08.2010 passed the following order:- “Heard. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that similarly situated accused; namely, father and the other son CRM No.M-22573 of 2010 of the husband of the complainant, have already been granted the benefit of regular bail. The present FIR was got registered in respect of the matrimonial offences and the main allegations have been levelled against the husband of the complainant. The present petitioner is the mother of the husband of the complainant. Notice of motion for 23.9.2010. In the meanwhile, in the event of arrest, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to the following conditions:- i) she shall join the investigation as and when required by the Investigating Officer; ii) she shall not offer any threat, promise or inducement to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing the same to the Investigating Officer/Court; and iii) she shall not leave the limits of the is Country without prior permission of the Court.” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has already joined the investigation pursuant to said order dated 06.08.2010. It has also been stated by learned counsel for the State that petitioner has joined the investigation and that she is no more required for any custodial interrogation. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that she is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, in view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of petitioner-Meman is accepted and order dated 06.08.2010 granting interim 2 CRM No.M-22573 of 2010 bail in favour of the petitioner is, hereby, made absolute subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) September 23, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 3