IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 1936 of 2005 Between: Smt.M.Lakshmi, w/o M.Chandramouli, r/o Nidigallu Gram Panchayat, Tadimarri Mandal, Anantapur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The District Educational Officer, Kamalanagar, Anantapur, Anantapur District. 2. The Mandal Development officer, Tadimarri Mandal, Anantapur District. 3. The Executive Engineer, Panchayatraj, Dharmavaram Z.P.Compound, Anantapur, Anantapur District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in trying to construct school building in some other place instead of the land admeasuring Ac.0.20 cents in Survey No.115-2 situated at Nidigallu Village and Gram Panchayat, Tadimarri Mandal, Anantapur District gifted by one Sri Anand Kumar vide gift deed dated 17-9- 2003 bearing document No.3541/2003 for the construction of school building and without considering the representations of the public in proper perspective as arbitrary, illegal and without jurisdiction and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. SESHADRI GOALLA Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR EDUCATION Counsel for Respondent Nos. 2&3: GP for Panchayat Raj. Smt.Jyothi Eswar Gogineni. The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: (per Honourable Sri Devinder Gupta, the Chief Justice) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the affidavit in reply filed by the respondents and in view of the fact that record has also been produced, the petitioner is satisfied that no case is made out for issuing any direction, and, therefore, he sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission sought for is granted and the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. _______________________ DEVINDER GUPTA, C.J. 17.3.2005. ___________________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. VR. To 1. The District Educational Officer, Kamalanagar, Anantapur, Anantapur District. 2. The Mandal Development officer, Tadimarri Mandal, Anantapur District. 3. The Executive Engineer, Panchayatraj, Dharmavaram Z.P.Compound, Anantapur, Anantapur District. 4. Two CCs to Government Pleader for Education, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 5. Two CCs to Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj, High Court, Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 6) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RS}