IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.5357 of 2002 Between: A.Amrutha Reddy ..... PETITIONER AND The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies, (Officer on Special Duty) Charminar Coop.Urban Bank Limited, Mehdipatnam, Hyderabad and another .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.5357 of 2002 O R D E R: Heard. The petitioner questions the action of the respondents in putting the house of the petitioner in public auction to be held on 30.03.2002 as per the sale notice issued by the 1st respondent-Deputy Registrar Cooperative Societies, Hyderabad in E.P.25/2001, dated 15.01.2002 pending disposal of CTA.263/2000 on the file of the Cooperative Tribunal, Hyderabad as illegal and arbitrary. This Court by order dated 26.03.2002 granted interim stay of auction of the house of the petitioner subject to the condition of the petitioner paying a sum of Rs.4,50,000/- on or before 01.05.2002, in default the stay shall stand vacated. Thereafter, this Court by order dated 10.06.2002 extended the time for payment of Rs.4,50,000/- upto 30.07.2002. It is stated that the petitioner did not deposit Rs.4,50,000/- within the stipulated period and therefore, the interim stay deemed to have been vacated. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner had approached the 2nd respondent for sanction of loan of Rs.12 lakhs but the 2nd respondent- Charminar Cooperative Urban Bank sanctioned Rs.8 lakhs only. As the petitioner committed default in payment of the loan amount the matter was referred for arbitration under Sec.61 r/w.Sec.62(2) of the A.P.Cooperative Societies Act and the 1st respondent passed an order in ARC.7/99-OSD dated 07.01.2000, against which the petitioner filed CTA.263/2000 on the file of the Cooperative Tribunal, Hyderabad and the Cooperative Tribunal, Hyderabad by order dated 07.01.2000 passed a conditional interim order pending disposal of the CTA on condition of the petitioner paying Rs.45,000/- every month. As the said conditional order has not been complied with, E.P.25/2001 was filed and in the E.P. the house was put in public auction. Questioning the said action this writ petition is filed. Admittedly, the CTA No.263/2000 is pending before the Cooperative Tribunal, Hyderabad. As the petitioner failed to comply with the conditional order passed by the Cooperative Tribunal, the E.P.proceedings were initiated. The petitioner neither complied with the conditional orders of this Court as well as the orders of the Tribunal, and therefore, I do not see any justification on the part of the petitioner in approaching the Cooperative Tribunal as well as this Court. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to pursue her remedy in CTA.263/2000 pending on the file of the Cooperative Tribunal, Hyderabad. No order as to costs. ___________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 12.08.2010 Dsr