IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26225 of 2008 KHEDAN PANDIT @ KHEDAN KUMAR PANDIT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ---------- 2. 31.7.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Arwal P.S. Case No.10/2003 for the alleged offences registered under sections 420, 467, 468 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the specific allegation is against another co-accused, namely, Ranjit. However, the petitioner has been also made accused. It is further submitted that from the statement of the informant recorded under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, it would appear that the basic allegation of handing over the alleged amount for procuring the appointment letter is on co-accused Ranjit and receiving of balance amount is also not against this petitioner. Considering the above, it is directed that the petitioner Khedan Pandit @ 2 Khedan Kumar Pandit, in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Arwal P.S. Case No.10/2003, within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub- section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)