IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12686 of 2005 1. RAJENDRA PASWAN S/O CHATRU PASWAN 2. SHIV KUMAR PASWAN S/O OF CHATRU PASWAN, BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF VILL- NUMAR, PS- BARHAT, DISTT- JAMUI----- -------------------PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, JAMUI 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PURNEA 4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR & CENSUS OPERATIONS R.T.O.PURNEA- ---------------------RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2 7.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioners are stated to be retrenched employees of the census operation which has been carried out in the year 1981. They filed this writ application claiming such a benefit in the light of discrimination since yet another person, namely, Baikunth Thakur came to be appointed in the year 1989. The only reason which is offered by the petitioners in approaching the High Court after so many years is filing of repeated representations before the authority. Hon’ble Supreme Court had already held that repeated representations are no ground for availing the remedy before the court of law and the same cannot be a ground for condonation. The claim of the petitioners is not only belated but suffers from latches on the face of it. No direction is required to be issued in the above circumstances. This writ application is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)