IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43719 of 2008 SANJU DEVI @ MANORAMA DEVI … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … … Opp. Party For the petitioner: Shri.Ranjan Kr.Jha For the State: Shir Dashrath Mehta, APP - - - - 2. 21.10.2008 The Court after hearing the parties is not inclined to admit the petitioner to anticipatory bail. However, if the court finds that the parties have compromised, as appears the case, the court below cold not be pre-occupied with the embargo which could have prohibited by virtue of the order passed in Cr. Misc. No. 21127 of 2007 and shall consider the prayer for bail of the petitioner favourly in the light of the fact that other accused persons have been granted bail by this Court in the light of the compromise and further that the petitioner is a lady and that she is stated to be suffering from some chronic orthopaedic problem. The petition is dismissed with the above observation. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)