IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRAPRADESH AT HYDERABAD HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1371 of 2010 DATE:02.08.2010 Between: Bandari Pochamma …… Petitioner And: Sandela Ramu @ Ramulu and others …..Respondents HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1371 of 2010 ORDER : The defacto-complainant seeks to file this revision petition against finding of acquittal by order dated 22.05.2010 recorded by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Jangaon in S.C. No.413 of 2009. In view of Section 401(3) Cr.P.C, while entertaining a revision petition under Section 397 Cr.P.C this Court cannot alter a finding of acquittal into one of conviction. The petitioner did not point out any irregularities in procedure during trial conducted by the lower Court. 2) The accused/respondents 1 to 3 were charged in the lower Court for offences punishable under Sections 506 and 307 I.P.C. The prosecution witnesses mainly focussed their attention on the sexual affair between the petitioner and A-1. P.Ws-4 to 6 and 8 to 11 turned hostile to the prosecution case. It is alleged that the accused set fire to her clothes, beat her and threatened to kill her. The prosecution did not mark any burnt clothes of the petitioner. There is no medical evidence regarding the petitioner/P.W-1 sustaining any burn injuries or any other injuries in that transaction. The lower Court after considering evidence of the prosecution, came to the conclusion that the prosecution did not make out the alleged offences under Sections 307 and 506 I.P.C. There are no grounds in law to interfere with the said finding of fact arrived at by the lower Court. 3) Hence, the revision petition is dismissed. _______________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J August 2, 2010 KSH