IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15476 of 2009 RAJ KUMAR RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 27.7.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 376/511 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation is that during night when the prosecutrix was sleeping alone in the room, the petitioner made entry therein and caught hold of her and she was pulled down on the ground and thereafter an attempt was made to commit rape on her by removing her sari. She raised hulla, in the mean time, the father-in-law and other co-villagers assembled and he was apprehended and later handed over to the Police. Learned counsel submits that going by the allegations contained in F.I.R. at best a case under Section 354 is only made out. It is contended that petitioner is in custody since 24.1.2009 and that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel referring to the averments made in para-9 submits that because of that case he has been made accused. This Court perused the averments made in paragraph-9 and found the same vague. 2 Learned A.P.P. looking to the case diary submits that the allegations contained in the F.I.R. have been supported in the course of investigation. Having regard to the allegations, this Court for the present, is not inclined to grant him the privilege of bail. Prayer for bail of the petitioner is, accordingly, rejected. Petitioner, however, is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after six months, if In the meanwhile the trial of the case is not taken up. P.K. (K.K. Mandal, J.)