IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1852 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6085 of 2006 With Interlocutory Application No. 8298 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.1852 of 2011. ====================================================== Chandrakala Devi, Wife of Late Baidyanath Rai, resident of Village - Harpur, Rewari, P.S.- Angarghat, District - Samastipur .... .... Respondent no. 3 / Appellant Versus 1. The New India Assurance Company through its Manager and duly constituted Attorney Sri Bhaskar Mallick, New India Assurance Company Limited, Regional Office, 6th Floor, B. S. F. C. Building, Fraser Road, Patna – 800001 …………………..….. Respondent 1st Set / Writ petitioner 2. The State of Bihar 3. The Permanent Lok Adalat, Muzaffarpur through its Presiding Officer, Civil Court, Muzaffarpur 4. Ranbir Kuma Mishra, son of Nagina Mishra, resident of Village - Rewari, P.S. - Angarghat, District - Samastipur .... .... Respondents / Respondents. ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Hemant Kumar Karan and Mr. Shekhar Singh, Advocates. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjay Singh, Advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 2 05-12-2011 Re. Interlocutory Application No. 8298 of 2011. The delay of 150 days occurred in filing the Letters Patent Appeal is condoned. Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. Patna High Court LPA No.1852 of 2011 (2) dt.05-12-2011 2 / 2 2 Re. Letters Patent Appeal No. 1852 of 2011. Feeling aggrieved by the order dated 10th May 2011 made by the learned single Judge in CWJC No. 6085 of 2006, the respondent no. 3, the claimant, has preferred this Appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent. It appears that the appellant had lodged Claim Case No. 54 of 2004 for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the Permanent Lok Adalat, Muzaffarpur. The said claim was adjudicated by the Permanent Lok Adalat without the consent of the insurance company. The order of the Lok Adalat has been set aside by the learned single Judge. Therefore, this Appeal. We see no merit in this Appeal. It is but natural that once the order of the Lok Adalat is set aside, the aforesaid Claim Case No. 54 of 2004 stands revived to be tried and decided in accordance with law. No case for interference is made out. Appeal is dismissed in limine. Dilip. (R.M. Doshit, CJ) (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)