1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Writ Petition No.4216 Of 2009. Ramesh S/o Namdeo Gorde. ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra And Others. ... Respondents. -------- Shri. P.S. Dighe, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Rekha K Ladda, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent Nos.1 to 4. Shri. S.V. Suryawanshi, holding for Shri.P.B. Shirsath, Advocate for respondent No.5. -------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & K.U. CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATE: 1st DECEMBER 2009 PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) The petitioner raises disputed questions in respect of alleged damage caused by deers to the crops in the agricultural lands. According to the petitioner, the Government has 2 determined meagre amount of compensation in such cases of crops being destroyed due to animals. The submissions of the petitioner is that in the light of the panchanamas drawn for the year 2009 in respect of destruction of crops, compensation is not paid to the petitioner. 3) In exercise of extra ordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, we are not inclined to enter into the issues in respect of extent of damage, if any, and the cause of the damage. If the State authorities had conducted some panchanama for determining the damage in view of the scheme as reflected in the Government Resolution and determined the amount of compensation then the respondents - authorities shall disburse the amount of compensation at the earliest. In case the petitioner is not satisfied with the amount of compensation, alternate remedies may be availed of. 4) The writ petition is disposed of. (K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl/ wp.4216.09