IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.4555 of 2010 Between: M/s. Redan Infrastructure Pvt., Ltd., Hyderabad. … Petitioner And M/s. Non-Conventional Energy Development Corporation of A.P., Ltd., (NEDCAP), Nampally, Hyderabad & another. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Siddartha Sarma for Sri P. Venugopal Counsel for respondent No.1: Sri Y. Rma Rao Counsel for respondent No.2: AGP for Forests This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.4555 of 2010 ORDER:- This Writ Petition is ﬁled for the following substantive relief: “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in proceeding with the meeting scheduled to be held on 26.02.2010 or any other subsequent date for looking into the aspect of passing orders on the application made by some other third party for establishment of power project of a capacity of 7 MW in Chittoor District based on the raw material called ‘poultry litter’ despite the representations dated 15.01.2010 and 23.02.2010 made by the petitioner company as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and pending disposal of the above writ petition, to direct the 1st respondent herein not to grant any sanction to any other company for the purpose of establishment of power project based on raw material called ‘poultry litter’ in Chittoor District without considering the representations of the petitioner dated 15.01.2010 and 23.02.2010 and without taking into the current availability of raw material namely poultry litter.” At the hearing, Sri Siddartha Sarma representing Sri P.Venugopal, learned counsel for the petitioner, stated that the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, WPMP.No.5872 of 2010 is also dismissed. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 08.12.2011 ES