:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE, JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE, JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE, JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5486 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5486 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5486 OF 2005 The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant. Versus Versus Versus Raghunath D. Raut & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mrs.P.H.Kantharia, APP, for the State. Mr.S.V.Marwadi, Advocate for the Respondent Nos.2,3 & 4. .... CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED : MARCH 09, 2006. DATED : MARCH 09, 2006. DATED : MARCH 09, 2006. P.C.: . Heard learned A.P.P for the State and Mr.Marwadi learned Advocate for respondent Nos.2,3 & 4. This is a double murder case. According to the learnd A.P.P. there is one eye witness and one servant. Both have been disbelieved on the ground of unsustainability in law. Leave granted. Appeal is admitted. Action under Section 390 of Cr.P.C. before the trial Court. The trial Court will consider the fact that the accused were on bail during the trial. (D.G.DESHPANDE, J.) (D.G.DESHPANDE, J.) (D.G.DESHPANDE, J.) :2: (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)