1 mss CHS1205 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1205 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 3245 OF 2007 AMARNATH D. YADAV .. PLAINTIFF Vs. SURENDER SINGH GURMUKH SINGH BAKSHI .. DEFENDANT AND KHUSHALI DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. .. RESPONDENT Mr. S. P. Srivastava for the plaintiff CORAM: S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED: 21/11/2011 P.C. Heard Shri Srivastava, learned advocate for the plaintiff. 2. Perused the chamber summons and the affidavit in support. It is stated that during pendency of the suit, the defendant has sold the property to respondent and, therefore, it is necessary to join the respondent because the suit is filed for a declaration that the demolition of the structure 2 mss CHS1205 belonging to the plaintiff is illegal and improper. Now, the property is purchased by a deed of conveyance dated 26th November, 2007. In these circumstances to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and for proper adjudication of the suit, the presence of respondent is necessary. 3. This chamber summons is duly served on both, the defendant and the respondent. None of whom are present. The chamber summons is therefore, made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment be carried out within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. (S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)