IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 3136 of 2011 Murari Lal ...Petitioner Versus Kamlesh Rani ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. J.S. Brar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. I.S. Mann, Advocate for the respondent. **** RANJIT SINGH J. In FIR registered under Sections 498, 406, 494 and 120- B IPC, the petitioner was acquitted. At the time of framing of charge, offence under Section 494 IPC was deleted. During the pendency of the trial, the complaint was filed under Sections 494 and 120-B IPC. Notice of motion was issued and further proceedings before the trial Court are stayed. Primarily, the petitioner is coming against the order summoning him for offence under Sections 494 and 120-B IPC. Against this order, the revision before the Court of Sessions is maintainable. Let the petitioner first avail the remedy of filing the revision before the Court of Sessions. The petitioner would also be at liberty to move an application seeking condonation of delay in filing the revision on the ground that he was pursuing his remedy before this Court. The delay shall be, accordingly, considered and condoned by the revisional court and the case shall be considered on merits. The present petition is, accordingly, disposed of. December 21, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE