IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.10372 of 2007 Between: V. Hanumanth Reddy S/o Ramana R/o P. Gujulapalli Village, Gooty Mandal, Anatapur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Joint Collector (CS), Aathapur District, Anantapur 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer,Ananthapur .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M. Nagaraju MR.C.B.RAM MOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following Order: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue a Writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings No: K4/ATP/210/2007, dated 26.04.2007 passed by the Joint Collector, Ananthapur, rejecting the stay of operation of the Orders in Rc.No. D1/CS/318/05, dated 02.02.2007 passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Ananthapur, as illegal, arbitrary, and has the effect of violation of fundamental rights guaranteed to me U/a 14, 19 & 21 of the Constitution of India, and to stay the operation of the orders in Rc. No. D1/CS/318/05, dated 02.02.2007 passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Ananthapur, and pass any such other orders.” At the hearing, Sri M. Nagaraju, learned counsel representing Sri C.B. Ramamohan Reddy, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.V.M.P.No.1676 of 2007 filed by the respondents in the writ petition and W.P.M.P.No.13093 of 2007 filed by the writ petitioner are disposed of as infructuous. _________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 21st July, 2009 GHN