awry IN THE ON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION § S INO, (;2%’€3 OF 2011 /, PETITIONER Bramhanand 3/0. Khojram Safnami, aged abouf 38 Year's, R/o. Nawapam Colony Chhal, Tahsit - Dhammjaigarh, Disff: Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS ‘ RESPONDENTS :1./ Chairman— Cum Managing Direcfor' Coal India limited Bilaspur' Chhc'rr‘risgarh / 2. Senior Divisional Manager SECL Raigarh Area Raigarh (C.G.) 3. Sub Divisional Manager, Sub Division Chhal, Tahsii— Dharamjaigar'h, Disfi: Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA . H @Df‘ HIGH COURT OF CHHA'ITISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 686 of2011 W WRII‘ PE HTION UNDER ARI ICLE§ 226 OI‘ IHE CONbTlTU'I ION OP INDIA SB Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agmhotri, J Present: Shn K K Pandey Advocate for the peuuoner Shn H B Agrawal Semor Advocate w1th Smt Meera .Izuswal Advocate for the respondents ORDER ORAL _ (Passed on 10 day of February, 2011) x Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has preferred an appeal against the dismissal order dated 16.10.2010 passed by the General Manager (Mining)/Sub Area Manager, Chhal, District Raigarh, which is pending consideration before the appellate authority since 27. 10.2010 (Annexure P/7). I Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents submits that since the appeal has not been preferred to the appropriate authority, thus, it could not be disposed ot‘in time. Be that as it may, ifthe appeal is pending consideration before the appellate authority, i.e. Chief Managing Director, South Eastern Coaltields Limited, Bilaspura, the same may be considered and decided as early as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance with law, on its own merit. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of: Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge PETITIONER : Bamhanand. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : Chaixman—cum Managing Director Coal Indla Lumted & Others