IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7571 of 2009 1. LOHA PRASAD 2. SHOBHA DEVI ………… PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2 7.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that petitioner no.1 is brother of the husband and petitioner no.2 is wife of petitioner no.1 having no concern with the differences of the complainant with her husband. So, petitioners’ arrest cannot be justified. I agree with the same. In the facts of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Complaint Case No.1362 of 2006 (Tr.no. 1031/08), the above named two petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub- divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI