1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE APPEAL NO. 934 OF 1997 IN SUIT NO.1464 OF 1996 1. K.R.Steel Union Ltd. & ors. Appellants vs. 1. Punjab National Bank & Anr. Respondents Mr. Dinesh Pednekar i/b. M/s. Khaitan & Jayakar for the appellants. Mr. K. H. Mody i/b. M/s. Little & Co. for respondent no.1. Mr. Sandeep Parekh i/b. M/s.Bilawala & Co. for respondent no.2. CORAM : R. M. LODHA & J.P. DEVADHAR,JJ DATED : 2nd September 2004 P.C. Mr.Dinesh Pednekar, the learned counsel for the appellants submits that he has no instructions to argue the matter. 2. On 9th July 2004, we passed the following order: " Mr.Ashish Panickar, the learned advocate for the appellant submits that talks of settlement between the parties have substantially progressed and some more time shall be required. 2. S.O. three weeks." 2 3. Thereafter, again at the request of the counsel for parties, we adjourned the matter on 19th August 2004 to enable the parties to file the consent terms. The order dated 19th August 2004 reads thus: "Earlier twice the hearing of the appeal was adjourned as the learned counsel appearing for the parties informed us that talks of settlement between the parties have been substantially progressed. The counsel for the parties pray for further time for filing consent terms. 2. S. O. two weeks under the caption "For filing consent terms". 4. The consent terms have not been filed and the learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has no instructions to argue the matter. 5. The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. (R.M. (R.M. (R.M. LODHA, J.) LODHA, J.) LODHA, J.) (J.P. (J.P. (J.P. DEVADHAR,J.) DEVADHAR,J.) DEVADHAR,J.)