IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.O.C.P.No.1509 of 2009 Date of Decision:-20.8.2009 Ram Lubhaya ...Petitioner Versus Ms.Vimmi Bhullar ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Mr.S.P.Soi, Advocate for the petitioner. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): The grievance of the petitioner in this case is that while dismissing his petition vide order dated 28.5.2007, this Court had directed the Executive Magistrate (D.O.R.G.) Patiala to decide the pending application of the petitioner for possession of the land at the earliest and despite the fact that a considerable period has elapsed, no orders have been passed by the aforesaid Officer on his application. I have considered the case of the petitioner. Without going into the merits of the averments made in this petition, I deem it appropriate to direct the Executive Magistrate (D.O.R.G.) Patiala to decide the application of the petitioner if pending as mentioned in the order dated 28.5.2007 passed in CRM No.34872-M of 2007 within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Disposed of. 20.8.2009 (Rakesh Kumar Garg) AS Judge