( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3526 OF 2010 Rahul Shankar Guldagad APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS .... Mr. S.S. Jadhavar, advocate for the applicant. Mrs. B.R. Khekale, APP for the respondent/State. .... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 28th September, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. It appears that the prosecutrix has married the applicant after she attained majority. An affidavit of the prosecutrix is placed on record (marked "X"). The learned APP also states that in view of such affidavit, the ad-interim bail order may be confirmed because arrest of the applicant is likely to cause turmoil in the marriage relationship between the spouses. In this view of the matter, arrest of the ( 2 ) applicant is not required for the purpose of effective investigation and as such, the ad-interim order dated 1st September, 2010 is confirmed and the application is disposed of in terms thereof. [V.R. KINGAONKAR] JUDGE NPJ/criapln3526-2010