1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.255 OF 2006 IN CRI.WRIT PETITION NO.896 OF 2006 Goldie Parshottam Sud, .. Petitioner Vs 1. The State of Maharashtra and ors Respondents Mr Madhukar Dalvi, for the petitioner Mr R.Y.Mirza,APP for the respondent-State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 3rd August, 2006 DATED : 3rd August, 2006 DATED : 3rd August, 2006 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. By this application, the applicant has prayed for modification of the order dated 11.7.06 passed by this Court in Criminal Writ Petition No.896 of 2006. Mr.Dalvi, learned counsel for the applicant, states that when he argued the matter he had requested this court to allow him to amend the writ petition since he wanted to add some more grounds. I perused the order dated 11.7.06. It is clear that the writ petition was disposed of after hearing the petitioner and no such request was recorded in the order. It was open for the petitioner to move the court immediately either for speaking to the minutes or by filing present application. To the best of my memory, such a request was not made. As a matter fact, the order dated 2 2 2 11.7.06 merely shows that the matter was heard on merits and it was disposed of. I find absolutely no merit in the contention raised in the present application. The application is rejected. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)