IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 23.07.2010 C.R.No.4548 of 2010 Nanak Chand ...Petitioner Versus Raj Karan and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. Naveen Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order passed by the learned trial Court on 08.06.2010, whereby ex parte proceedings leading to ex parte judgment and decree dated 12.11.2003 were ordered to be set aside. Learned trial Court has found that defendant No.2 was served by Munadi after it was reported that he has refused to accept summons. It was also found that such report of refusal is not attested by any witness. In respect of defendant No.1, it has been found that the said defendant was never served. In view of the said fact, the setting aside ex parte proceedings against the defendants cannot be said to be suffering from any patent illegality or irregularity, which may warrant any interference in the revisional jurisdiction of this Court. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed. 23.07.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE