1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5830/2008. Pushap Kumar. VERSUS The Board of Revenue, Rajasthan, Ajmer & Others. 02.07.2008. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.Sunil Kumar Singodiya, for the petitioner. ***** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner is that by the order dated 02.04.2008 the Receiver has been directed to handover the possession to the opposite party. It is not in dispute that the revision petition is still pending before the learned Board of Revenue. In the present case the petitioner has rushed to this court at the interlocutory stage of decision on the stay/misc. application by the Board. This court seldom interferes in the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the matters arising out of the application under Section 212 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act regarding interim relief and interference by this court at the interlocutory stage during the hearing of the proceedings on the application under Section 212 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act is even more remote. While the revision petition is still pending before the learned Board of Revenue 2 this petition against the interlocutory order on the stay application is not maintainable. In the facts and circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the petitioner to get the revision petition decided by the learned Board of Revenue at an early stage by making an application for early hearing of the same. Subject to the above, this writ petition stands disposed of. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.