OF AT CT'BLE S] •ETITIONJ ^ '^1 Smt. Phuleshwari wife of Shri Somar Sai, aged about 47 years- Lesident of Viilage Sorga, Post Pandopara, Tahsil Baikunthpur, District Koriya (C.G.) of Chfaattissarh. Tliroueh: »+. Women and lent, D.K,S. 3 Child Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Commissioner, Women and Child Development, Raipur (C.G.) The Collector, Distric.t Koria, Baikunthpur(C.G.) The Programme/Project-Officer, (Project), Baikunthpur, District Koria (C.G-). Tfae Chief Executive Officer. Janpad Panchayat, Baikuntbputv- District Koria, (C.G.). Janpad Panchayat, Baikunthpur, Through: The President, Janpad Panchayat Bai1c)6ithpur, District Koria (C.G.)., Amraso Bai Wife of Shriram, Resideat of Khalpara, resideat df Village Sorga, Pandopara, Tahsil Baikunthpur, District Koriya (C.G.) >resent: Shri P.P.Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Govemment Advocate for the^ respQndent No. I to4. Sfari Prakash Tiwari, Advocate for the respondent No. 7 S^' (^y ^. 4. ORDER (Passed on 2"1 ofApril, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has a preferential right of appointment over respondent No. 7 because she is already working as Anganbadi Sah-Sahayika for the last two years. Leamed counsel fartfaer submits that the candidature of the pstitioner was rejected on the ground of her age to be 47 years. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 7 submits that the respondent No. 7 has the first preference over all the other ladies. Secondly, the respondent no, 7 is a mem'Ber of the Scheduled Tribe community, contrary to the petitioner, who belongs to Other Backward Class. §e that as it may, the Collector, Baikunthpur, District Koria, is directed to look into the facts of the case and submissions made by their counsel and pass the appropriate order, after affording proper opportimity of hearing to both the parties, in accordance with law as per Anganbadi Scheme, within a period of three weeks from the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. The parties are at libert}.' to raise all the grounds whatever is available to them in support oftheir cases. In viewofabove, this writ petition stands disposed of. Ad interim order granted earlier vide order dated 08.08.2006 shall remain in operation for a period ofthrse weeks from the date ofthis order. Sd/- Satish K. Agruhotri Judge Amit