IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8830 of 2010 M/S R.S.PANDEY & CO. Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ----------- For the Petitioner: Archna Palkar Khopde, Advocate For the Union of India: Md. Abu Haider, CGC . ---------- 2 18.5.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The Court is of the considered opinion that the writ application is premature at this stage. Petitioner has been only given a show cause for contemplated action under clause 52 of the agreement. It will be well within the interest of the petitioner to first respond to the show cause instead of challenging the same. This writ application is misplaced. If the petitioner first files his show cause before the concerned authority and if no further action has already been taken the authority may consider the same and pass appropriate order. This writ application stands disposed of with the liberty above. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)