CRM-M No. 38131 of 2010 **** Omkar Anand vs. State of Haryana Present: Mr.Mahavir Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shalini Attri, DAG, Haryana. **** This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in a case bearing FIR No. 121 dated 29.03.2010, under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC registered at Police Station City Sonipat. Learned DAG, instructions from ASI Sunil Kumar, states that the petitioner had joined investigation pursuant to the interim bail granted to him by the learned Sessions Judge and that he is not required any further. In this view of the matter, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.:- i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police office as and when required; ii)that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of this case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer; and iii)that the petitioner shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE January 24 , 2011 sunita