l\ 1 HiQH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUI ilpRS :t No-2SA9 cf 2011 "ij^s&w" c: p, NBtrsm Dhruw, S/o, l8t8 Shri Lakhsn Lai Dhruvv', aged about 59 years. H^;^^ MastBr. Govt. Prin^3rv School nariKara, UIOCK unamian, ijisinci Dhamtari ''C.G.'S ROQD R%m Vorm^. S/Q. E:3t8 Shri Hutasan Singh Verma, aaed about E7 vssrs !-laa-| ^.'actor f~!m)4 Pt^hnnl J.,[.. ^.^*.^ "nmary scnooi i enau&naina, DIOCK Qrt-y-^-'s n^-^^ p-s?"; ?- /'<s r^ ^ ^n;-^ffi. i^;.3-U^;. ,\C^pU, ^^.^.; PijrEj^hntt^n" Ni^h^r^ ??/o l^?^ RhrE jagyii r\am NisnaQ; agea auoui oo vaa-s Has" Mactp- /~;nv* p-:"~arv ocnooi r<arn 'Maaar ij'raua. DIOCK [''''g'gn.'g District RaJDur ('C.G.! -.»,.^„.. ^..^ . -^ -^ Mi'gD Rsr" Verms. S/o. late Shri Ledua SinRh Verma, afied about 61 '^•s'src. ! ? "•^•iss' r^''i?1^;sf"i?"t 7i!S's^'<*^'Ci'' rs.;^^?A ^'~Z;?S! 'S ; ''BT';J.w;i:^^ "—i'i¥.'•^i i.,-i i ; i ;i~;d'li>/! i'^?! ; 't^?';-; y;.. tviiaaie \ ycnooi uiraua, siocK ff^. n ^ D. "r'n M^hri I ^l !<?:???hv;?n ^/o |?tp ^hri '-f ^i''-- ~-^'^'- i^^'w -h/i J. : uasnram i-a' xasnyap, agea aDoui 57 vssrs Hfisri Mais-nr ttnvt M'rfdipi ocnooi yiapur, BIOCK Simua, Uisinci Raipur(C.G.) Rp^nf^?'^ ^ riH^ \/^1'^^. ?^/n '??f?s ?^hri '\esno riam verma, asea aDOut oa vssrs. UD"er Dlvision Teachsr. Govf^ '"iiaciie'sciiooi uor, biocK ur'a''siva. District Raiour 'C.G.) /'k:ntg Ra—Ysrfsv fi/n 'a+a Rhr: i\no!'Danra K'am Taaav. agea a&oui Q^ y^ff.r^ L!DD8F DivlsiOH TS3Ch8F. uovi. jyijQQie scnooi • baruanaa, Rinntf nhsreh.a nietrif4 Rai-i!!!- iT- F; V ^'u-..". i.;i!e;iB;"ei, L.f'su.i-.; i\,a!j-Ui ^,..'J,; Or^ksr Prassd Verms. S/o. Iste Shri ">am i^nana verma, aaea aDoui oo ViSipr's f 'nnns'.r H"vfis'n"i T^^r^h^r F^n^ft ^^•v.--.::^ ^^:^\..f ^-•; i-,3;^'; it;.:^,^;;^^ •^.'-/v^. uir's iv"Quis scnooi tinvan, yiuCK Dharslva, D'sfrict Raipur fC.G.) Rmf Amrika Vsrm?3 W/n Shr' Onksr r-i'asaa verma, aciea aoouE ou vears, j in?'*;Cir r]hr^r'^ T^^'~-ha" f^ry.f- '"iiQr'ief osconaarv ocnoo' auacneQ C:-f~t\;" Mirjriip c?rthnr';! •C^;K/?^['? Rlrllnt^ W.P.CS)No. 2949 of 2011 ^' c i-~ 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1. . Dharsiva, District Raipur (G.G.) Purushottam Lal Sahu, S7o. late Shri Manbodhi Lal Sahu, aged about 54 years, Head Master, Govt. Primap/ School Magsha, Block Dharsiva, District Raipur (C.G.) Krishngir Gosvvaml, S/o. lateShri Ratangir Goswami, aged about 58 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt.. Middle Schoof Malod, Block Dharsiva, Dlstrict Raipur (C.G.) Damodar Prasad Pandey, S/o. late Shri Satanand Pandey, aged about 53 years, Upper Diyision Teacher, Go\4.- Middie Schoof Saragaon, Block Dharsiva, DisSrtet Raipur (C.G.) Bharat Lal Verma, S/o. Shri Sunder Lal Verma,, aged about 50 years, Head Master, Govt. New Primary School Paras Nagar Raipur, Block Dharsiva, District Raipur (C.G.) Smt. Annapurna IVIanjhi, W/o. "Shri H.S. Manjhi, aged about 53 years, Head Master, Govt. New Primary School Tilaknagar Gudiyari, Block Dharsiva, District Raipur (C.Q.) Smt. Bhagwati Prasad Dewangan, VV/o !ate Shri Buddhuram Dewarigan, aged about 51 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School Pandarbhatta, BSock ' Dharsiva, District Raipur (C.G.) Smt. Abha Dubey, W/o Shri Dev Kumar Dubey, Aged about 50 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middie School Kachna, Biock Dharsiva, District Raipur (C.G.) Raj Kumar Shukla, S/o. !ate Shri Radhika Prasad Shukla, aged about 58 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Teiibandha, Block Dharsiva, District Raipur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) W.P.CSlNo. 2949 of2011 2. 3 Djstriet Education Officer, Raipur, District RaipiDr(G.G.) District Education Officer, Dhamtan, Distrid Dhamtari, (C.G.) WRIT PETiTiON UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA 4. Mr. Shashank Thakur, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Somkant Verma,Advocateforthepetitioners. Mr. M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt Advocatefor the State/respondents. ORALORDER Heard. , Learned counsel for the petitionerssubmits that the petitioners were appoirrted as Assistant Teacher on a fixed pay. After completion of probation period, the petitioners were granted regular pay scale. Learned counsel further submits that the issue involved in the case is as to whether the petitioners were entitled to regular pay scale with effect from the date of initial appointment or after completion of. probation perifid. The issue involved, herein, was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No.2745/89 (Mahdukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. Stateof M.P. & others), wherein It was held that the similarly situated teaehers are entltled to regu!ar pay scale w.e.f. the date of Initia] appointment. The matter was taken up to Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Givil) No.6832/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunai to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from the dateof initial appointment. Learned counsel also submits that this Court, while considering the same issue inseyera! writ petitions,allowedthepetitionerstomake a representation along with copy of the petition and annexures 7. W.P.fS'iNo. 2949 of 2011 within a period often days, raisingall theirgrievances andin turn the concerned respondent was directed to decide the representation in an objective manner within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt ofthe representation. Accordingty, the petitioners are granted liberty to make a representation to the concerned authority. Itis expected that the representation may be considered and decided in accordance with lawwithin a reasonable period, subjectto verification offacts. In view of the above, the petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to costs. In viewoftheabove, IA.No. 1/2011 forurgent hearing and I.A. No. 2l2Q'\ 1 for hearing during summer vacation both stand disposed of. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Vacation Judge vattl /\ ii-.i^