IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12713 of 2008 Nitesh Kumar son of Sri Keshari Nandan Sharma, resident of vill- Sukhaspur, P.O. Modanganj, P.S. Ghosi in the Dist. of Jehanabad. ---Petitioner. Versus 1. The Union Of India through the Home Secretary, Union of India, North Block, New Delhi. 2. The Deputy Inspector General, Central Industrial Security Force, (Ministry of Home Affairs), Headquarters, North Region, Shaket, New Delhi. 3. The Deputy Inspector General, Central Industrial Security Force, (Ministry of Home Affairs), Pataliputra, Boring Road, Patna-13. 4. The Group Commandant, Group Headquarters, Shaket New Delhi. 5. The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. ---Respondents. ----------- 02 08.07.2011 Petitioner prays for diverse reliefs. Relief B of para 1 of the writ petition reads as under:- “B. Also for directing the respondents concerned to dispose of the appeal vide Annexure- 9, preferred by the petitioner against the order of termination passed against the petitioner.” In paragraph no. 16 the petitioner has asserted as under:- “16. That the petitioner thereafter being aggrieved by the order of termination, contained in Annexure-8 preferred an appeal before the respondent Deputy Inspector General on 7th July 2008 mentioning therein that the petitioner has not suppressed the pendency of criminal case. The criminal case has been registered against the petitioner on 16th April 2006 (which is after the last date for making application for appointment pursuant to Annexure-1).” The respondents have filed a counter affidavit which is on record. Learned counsel for the respondents draws attention of this Court to paragraph nos. 32 and 33 of the counter affidavit. Paragraph no. 33 of the counter affidavit reads as under:- “33. That with regard to the statement made in paragraph no. 24 to this writ application it 2 is stated that the appeal submitted by the petitioner is under consideration of the Inspector General, CISF for its disposal on merit of the case.” It, thus, appears that appeal filed against the order of termination (Annexure-8) is pending. In that view of the matter, this Court disposes of the application by the following order:- Let pending appeal, if not already decided till date, be disposed of in accordance with law by the respondent no.2 within a period of 01 month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )