: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.64 OF 1996 Mrs.Shobhana R. Khimani & Anr. ....Plaintiffs V/s. Mrs.Kanchanben R. Khimani & Anr. ....Defendants Ms.Yogini Gada i/b Harakchand & Co. for the Plaintiffs. Mr.I.S. Yadav for Defendant No.2. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 18TH SEPTEMBER, 2008. P.C. : 1. Defendant No.1 has expired and is therefore deleted from the record. The suit as against Defendant No.3 is dismissed for want of prosecution. The suit between the Plaintiffs and Defendant No.2 is disposed of in terms of the consent terms signed by the Plaintiff and Defendant No.2 and their advocates, tendered in Court, taken on record and marked "X". The undertakings contained in the consent terms are accepted. 2. When the consent terms were tendered before the Conciliator, Plaintiff Nos.2 and 3 were minors. Hence clause 14 of the consent terms. Today they have : 2 : attained majority. It is further stated that Plaintiff Nos.2 and 3 signed these consent terms after they attain majority. 3. The suit accordingly stands disposed of. Refund as per rules.