IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.110 OF 2005 IN REVIEW PETITION NO. 38 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITIOPN NO. 724 OF 2005 KHAN UBAIDUR REHMAN ABDULLA & ORS ...PETITIONERS. VS. SHRI GAMEY, ADITIONAL COLLECLTOR, (ENCROACHMENT) AND ORS. ...RESPONDENTS. MR. MIHIR DESAI FOR THE PETITIONERS. MR. P.M.JADHAV APP FOR RESPONDENT NO.1. & 2. MR. M.M.VAISI FOR RESPONDENT NOS. 3 TO 5. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. DATE : July 14, 2006. DATE : July 14, 2006. DATE : July 14, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The Petitioner is alleging that the Respondents committed contempt of the Order passed by the division bench of this Court on 5th April, 2005. In short what is alleged is that the respondent nos. 3,4 and 5 had started the work on the site without complying with the directions of the Court. 2. The learned Counsel representing the respondent nos. 3,4 and 5 states that in fact the work has been stopped. The work was in progress only for three days. However, he has now stopped the work and he further makes a statement that he will not carry out the work till the Order is complied with in all other respects, including the issuance of LOI by the SRA. 3. In view of this statement, the contempt petition stands disposed of. ..... [S.K.SHAH,J.] [S.K.SHAH,J.] [S.K.SHAH,J.]