1 cri-appln.310-10 mgn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.310 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2318 OF 2010 Ketan K. Tirodkar, ..Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra in Special MCOC Case 11 of 2004 ..Respondent Applicant party in person. Mr. P.A.Pol, P.P., for the respondent. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE: 4th October, 2010. P.C. Heard the applicant party in person and Mr. Pol, the learned P.P. 2. This is an application taken out for speaking to minutes. Para.4 of our order dated 12th August, 2010 be corrected and read as under:- “4.We make it clear that the petition will have to be decided at the admission stage itself as the petitioner is seeking relief solely on the 2 cri-appln.310-10 law point i.e. the sanction under Section 23 of the MCOC Act was not obtained before taking cognizance in MCOC Special Case No.4 of 2004 from which all further proceedings arose and, therefore, the MCOC Special Case No.11 of 2004 is required to be dismissed against him.” Criminal Application is disposed off accordingly. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)