IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2090 of 2010 SARJU PRASAD AMBASTHA S/O LATE BALDEO SAHAI R/O VILL.- MOCHAREE, P.O. MOCHAREE, P.S. BODH GAYA, DISTT.- GAYA Versus RAY MADAN KISHORE, THE GAYA MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER CUM CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (ADMINISTRATOR), GAYA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION DISTT.- GAYA ----------- 3 23.09.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the opposite party-Corporation. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner stating therein to the effect that except the claims as mentioned in paragraph 5 all the retiral dues have been settled and paid. Learned counsel for the opposite party-Corporation submits that with regard to the implementation of the revised pay scale in terms of the 6th Pay Revision Committee’s Report w.e.f. 01.04.1997 none of the employees have been paid and when such payment would commence the petitioner shall also be paid along with other retired employees of the Corporation after a policy decision is taken by the Corporation. Similarly the arrears of pension after March, 2010 will also be accordingly considered. In view of the above, the contempt application need not proceed further and the same accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)