IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.5600 OF 2007 DATED:03.12.2010 Between: Hariram Bahed … Petitioner And Smt. Chandrakantha Ladda and another … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.5600 OF 2007 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order dt.19.7.2007 passed by the XIII Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, in C.M.A. No.2 of 2006 in confirming the order dt.30.12.2005 passed by the II Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, in I.A. No.2207 of 2005 in O.S. No.6685 of 2005, in giving certain directions while grating temporary injunction in favour of the revision petitioner - plaintiff. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S. No.6685 of 2005 on the file of the Court of the II Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The suit was filed for permanent injunction against the respondents – defendants. Along with the suit, the petitioner also filed I.A. No.2207 of 2005 for temporary injunction restraining the respondents and their men from interfering, dispossessing or demolishing the portion of house bearing No.20-3-658, at Tagarikanaka, Hussain Alam, Hyderabad. The learned Junior Civil Judge, by order dt.30.12.2005 allowed the application granting temporary injunction in favour of the petitioner and against the respondent No.1 till the petitioner will be evicted under due process of law and against respondent No.2 till the respondent authorities will proceed against the petition schedule property for demolition by following the procedure contemplated under the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act or till diposal of the suit, whichever is earlier. Aggrieved by the said directions while granting temporary injunction by the learned Junior Civil Judge, the petitioner - plaintiff filed an appeal before the Court of XIII Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, and the appeal was dismissed. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition. Both the Courts below, i.e., the trial Court and the appellate Court, after going into the merits of the case, passed orders as long back as in 2005 and 2007 respectively. At this stage, I do not find any reason to interfere with the same. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _______________________ B. PRAKASH RAO, J 03.12.2010 bnr