IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.2245 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.05.2011 Kulwinder Singh . . .Petitioner Versus Surjeet Singh . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.A.K. Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Ranjivan Singh, Advocate, for the respondent. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against order dated 14.3.2011 by which an application filed by the tenant to prove death certificate of Chand Singh son of Bishan Singh has been declined. Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that he had taken a stand in his reply that Ujjagar Singh son of Chand Singh had received rent from him upto the month of May 2009. He wanted to contend that the rent was paid to him after the death of Chand Singh and in order to prove the death of Chand Singh, he wanted to produce on record his death certificate. Learned counsel for the respondent, however, submits that the tenant cannot be allowed to fill lacuna at this stage by producing the said document. I have heard both the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record from which I have found that the tenant only wants to produce the death certificate of Chand Singh, which is not a manufactured document, therefore, the said document can be brought on record in order to prove the death of Chand Singh only. In view thereof, revision petition is hereby allowed, however, subject to payment of `5000/- as costs. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) MAY 02, 2011 JUDGE Vivek