[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.365 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.686 OF 2008 Munawar Mohd.Yunus Shaikh ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.Rishi Bhuta advocate for applicant Ms.A.T.Jhaveri A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JULY 29, 2008 DATE : JULY 29, 2008 DATE : JULY 29, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant was granted bail by this Court by order dated 16.4.2008. The said bail was granted in CR No. 92 of 2007 of Khalapur police station, Dist. Raigad. The bail was granted in the sum of Rs.25,000/-. The learned advocate for the applicant has submitted that as the applicant hails from poor background, he has been unable to furnish requisite surety in the amount of Rs.25,000/-. It is submitted that as the applicant has been unable [-2-] to furnish the surety since more than three months, the applicant has been languishing in jail, hence, it is prayed that that the surety amount may be reduced. 3. Looking to the above facts, the surety amount is reduced from Rs.25,000/- to Rs.10,000/-. Rest of the conditions in the order dated 16.4.2008 are maintained. 4. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]