IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 15292 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION: 20.10.2011 Harnam Singh ..........Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ..........Respondents BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- None for the petitioner. Ms. Kavita Arora, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Suvir Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.3. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. Reply on behalf of respondent No.3 has been filed in Court today and the same is taken on record. Learned counsel for respondent No.3 on the basis of reply submits that necessary relief as claimed in the petition including pension upto September, 2011, arrears of revised pension w.e.f. 1.1.2006, revised pension from 1.8.2009 and other benefits have been released to the petitioner. In view of the reply, the present petition has become infructuous and is dismissed as such. However, in case still the petitioner is aggrieved by any action of the respondents or necessary payment has not been made, he is at liberty to make representation to the respondents. October 20, 2011 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE