IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13878 of 2010 Naresh Prasad Yadav @ Naresh Prasad, S/o Late Sibbi Yadav, Resident of Village- Bhatu Bigha, P.S. Ghosi (Okri O.P.), District- Jehanabad. …………………………….Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ………………………….Opposite Party. ----------- 3. 15. 07. 2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 14. 12. 2009, in a case registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged in the F.I.R. that due to some land dispute the petitioner and one Sudhir Prasad Yadav assaulted the informant's father with lathi, as a result of which the victim died on the spot. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that from the F.I.R., it appears that the informant has not seen the occurrence as in the first part he states that he saw the petitioner and one other person assaulting his father, but in the later part of the F.I.R. it is stated that after death of the father, the informant and others came out from the house. It is further submitted that only family members have supported the prosecution case and 2 there is admitted land dispute and the victim had serious criminal history and due to collapse of the wall, the informant's father received injury. Learned counsel for the informant submits that there is specific allegation against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State submits that during investigation, it is found that there is admitted land dispute and the family members of the victim have supported the prosecution case. Considering the fact that there is specific allegation in the F.I.R., I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at present. Hence, his prayer for bail is rejected. m.p. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)