1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1167 OF 2004 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION Nos. 326 OF 2005 Sou. Alka Dattatraya Vader ........Appellant versus Smt. Jaibunbi Ajij Mujawar......... Respondents. Mr. N.N. Bhadrashete i/b Pallavi Divekar adv. for the appellant Mr. Umesh Manekapure adv. for the respondents CORAM: A. P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 3rd APRIL, 2009. P.C.: 1. The consent terms duly singed by the parties and their advocates were placed on record before this court on 17th March 2009. However, the consent terms were not accepted and compromise was not recorded as the respondent had not remained present in the court. It was then stated that the respondent is a resident of Sangli and was not keeping good health. Thus it was suggested that the compromise be permitted to be certified by the labour court before whom the parties would appear. Having regard to the ailment of the respondent and convenience of the parties, the order in that regard came to be passed on 17-3-2009. Thereafter parties appeared before the Commissioner of Workmen's Compensation and the Judge, 2 Labour court, Sangli on 16-3-2009 and the trial court has certified the consent terms and recorded the compromise. The consent terms duly recorded and certified by the trial court has placed on record of this court by the respective counsel appearing for the parties and a joint prayer is made for disposal of the appeal in consent terms. In the consent terms the respondent has agreed to accept the sum of Rs. 65000/-. towards full and final settlement towards the compensation payable by the appellant. The trial court had awarded Rs. 65,000/-by way of compensation so also interest thereon. In the consent terms the interest has been given up whereas the amount of compensation is maintained. In that view of the matter the consent terms placed on record duly recorded and certified by the trial court are accepted and marked as `X' for identification. The appeal stands disposed of in consent terms which shall substitute the award passed by the trial court. The appeal is disposed of with no order as to costs. 4. In view of the disposal of the appeal,civil application does not survive and the same is also disposed of. (A. P. DESHPANDE, J.)