THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.5877 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner is an advertising agency. The 3rd respondent is another advertising agency obtained NOC/licence from the A.P. Wakf Board, the 4th respondent, and erected hoardings at Darge Takia Amanuallah Shah, Tank Bund, after obtaining permission from the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation. The 4th respondent revoked its licence and based on the same, the Corporation required the 3rd respondent to remove the hoardings. Challenging the same, he filed W.P.No.832 of 2011. An interim order was passed by this Court on 24.01.2011 in W.P.M.P.No.1023 of 2011, staying further steps in pursuance of the orders passed by the Corporation. The petitioner contends that though the interim order has the effect of staying the removal of hoardings, the 3rd respondent is displaying advertisements upon it. It is alleged that the Corporation did not prevent such illegal activity. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for the Corporation. On the face of it, the writ petition is misconceived. The 3rd respondent is continuing in the activity of advertisement on the strength of the interim orders passed by this Court. The restricted interpretation placed by the petitioner upon the orders of this Court is totally untenable. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as costs. _____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.09.03.2011. GJ