1 mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.1744 of 2007 Kaulchand Hastimal Jogani & Ors. ... Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents ... Mr. G.S. Godbole for the petitioner. Mr. R.M.Patne, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATED : 07th June 2010 P.C. 1. In my view, the impugned order does not affect the petitioners at all. The original order was allowing the sub-division of the property which has been affirmed all through by the revenue authorities. Learned counsel for the petitioner may affect the rights which the petitioners claim to have in the property or part thereof. It is clarified that the sub-division of the property would not affect the rights, if any, which the petitioners may have in the property or any part thereof. With this observation, petition is dismissed. (D.G. KARNIK,J.)