^-78 ^3wT "qi^io^, u>-a1<<i<ic,R^i^y<< r' HMOI ^^TT^ ^200 3TT^?Tq^P (qcrfgel^) 3TT^$TciTTf^rtcp ?Tsn3n^?Ta?qt<i? ?^ITSR^rf^T3TT^$T cp|^Ic"»<nT1HFIc^t' ^"f^€t^RTT^R ^3Tf^T3TT^^T i; Hon'blleA W.P. ts1 (Sinole Bench; Hon'blle Mr. Justice &hirendra Mishra) No.6535/2008 (Petition U/A 2 PETn-EONER Vs RESPON&ENTS 1. Th( Se< D.K 2. AS! Dei 3. Blo Ois 26 of Constitution of India) Gulab |Ram Diwan, S/o Late Lakhu Ram Diwan, aged [about 54 years, Preseht working as Assist{int Teacher dt Primary School, Kudmura, Reside^t of Vilage-Kudmura, Post Office Ranpur, Police j Station- Narayanpur, Block-Bagicha, Distri4t Jashpur (C.e.). Present: Mr. Somkant Verma/ Advocate for Ms.Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for 1 T State of Chhattisgarh/ Through: ^retary, Tribal Welfare bepartment, |.S. BhQwan/MantralQya, Raipur (CG). ^istant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare ^artment, District Jashpur (CG). |:k Education Officer, Block Bagicha, 1-rict Jashpur (C.<5.) the petitioner. he State. 24.11.2008 Grievance of the petition^r/who is physically disabled, is that he is working as Assistant Teacher in 2006. He attended his duties in tH from the document of Annexure P2| period mentioned in the document representation for release of his| Block Education Officer, Block Bacj ^he Primary School, Kudmura since February, e said school regularly which would be evident ^, however, he has not been paid salary for the )f AnnexureP-2. Learned counsel for the p^titioner submits that he has already made salary for the aforesaid period before the icha, District Jashpur, however, the same.has ?C-78 ^3'wT'r^l<<lrt«,tp-^l^i<i<»,Rrtl^^ x TPTOT^^T^ 3TT^?iq^^ (^cfijel^) ^200 OT^^TcPTf^TT^ cT2n3TT^$T3?^tcp lt ^. B^cTTSR^rf^T3:IT^$T ^ not been considered. He further ^i this stage, however, he prays for| representation of the petitioner w Learned Panel Lawyer for files fresh representation before and decided by respondent No.3 v( receipt of representation. In view of above submissl petition is disposed of with libertty along with certified copy of this grievances raised in this peti1|i respondent No.3 is directed to cor law within a period of six weeks fr<| Certified copy as per rules. cpi^fo41<ri ^i+irtT^TsLc) ^Ri^i<< ^)3Tf^T3TT^^T ;ubmits that he does not press this petition at a direction to respondent No.3 to decide the ithin the specified period. |he State submits that in case the petitioner 'espondent No.S/the same shall be considered ^ithin a period of six weeks from the date of [onsof learned counsel for the parties/this to the petitioner to make representation |order before respondent No.3 raising all his ion. On such representation being made, ksider and decide the same in accordance with |)m thedate of receipt of representation. Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge