IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH AUGUST 2010 / 20TH SRAVANA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 3584 of 2010(E) ------------------------------------------ (CBCID.CR.210/CR/SII/08/CR.NO.406/08 OF VAZHAKULAM POLICE STATION) ............. PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 5 AND 7: ------------------------------------------------ 1. BAIJU K.K., AGED 39 YEARS, S/O.KUTTAPPAN, PARACKAL HOUSE, KUMARANALLOOR, KOTTAYAM. 2. RAMESH P.R., AGED 26 YEARS, S/O.RAJAMONY, PARACKAL HOUSE, KUMARANALLOOR, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.RAJAGOPAL PADIPPURACKAL. RESPONDENTS/STATE AND COMPLAINANT: ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CB CID, ERNAKULAM. R1 & R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. M.S. BREEZ. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/08/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: prv. V.RAMKUMAR, J. ------------------------------------------------ Bail Application No.3584 of 2010 ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of August, 2010 ORDER In this petition filed under Sec.438 Cr.P.C. the petitioners (Accused Nos.5 & 7) seek anticipatory bail on the allegation that they are sought to be arrested by Vazhakulam police in connection with CB CID Cr.210/CR/SII/08 (Crime No.406/2008) registered for an offence punishable under Section 489 A, B, C, D and 34 I.P.C. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application. 3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case including the fact that grave offences are involved, anticipatory bail cannot be granted to the petitioners . There is no reason why they should not approach the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail after their arrest. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE skj