1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.09.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.JYOTHIMANI W.P.(MD)No.10902 of 2011 Thanakayee @ Sengamalai ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Trichirappalli, Trichy District. 2.A.V.Joseph ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.07.2011. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Gopalamanikandan For Respondents : Mr.M.Govindan, Spl.G.P. for R1 O R D E R Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the 1st respondent. By consent, the Writ petition itself is taken up for final hearing. 2.The Writ petitioner is stated to be in possession of a punja land to an extent of 0.78.0 hectares in Survey No.275/1, in which, she has put a house and living there for the past 20 years and she continues to live in the said place along with her son after the death of her husband. 3.The grievance of the petitioner, as it is seen in the representation made by her on 18.07.2011 to the 1st respondent is that the 2nd respondent and his men in the year 1966, after the death of her husband, has created forged documents claiming ownership over the same and therefore, in the said representation, she has requested the 1st respondent to take appropriate action for the alleged forgery stated to have been committed by the 2nd respondent and others. 4.Even though in the said representation, she has also stated that the 1st respondent Police should take steps to cancel the forged document, the learned counsel for the petitioner would fairly submit that aspect of the representation is not pressed and the petitioner would take https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 appropriate action in the appropriate Civil forum for setting aside the same. 5.In such view of the matter, the 1st respondent is directed to consider the said representation dated 18.07.2011 and if it is found that a prima facie case is made out in respect of the allegation of forgery, it is for the 1st respondent to take appropriate criminal action after conducting proper investigation in accordance with law and file a report before the jurisdictional Magistrate. The Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl. Side) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar (C.S) To The Superintendent of Police, Trichirappalli, Trichy District. + 1 cc to M/s.Gopalamanikandan, Advocate, SR No.33331 + 1 to The Special Government Pleader, SR No.33104 W.P.(MD)No.10902 of 2011 23.09.2011 nbj RJ/10.10.11 2p/4c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/