IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST AUGUST 2011 / 9TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 11470 of 2011(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SMT.SREELATHA.G., PADIPURAYIL HOUSE, KEEZHANTTINGAL P.O., ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.JOHN K.GEORGE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE BANKING OMBUDSMAN, C/O.RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, BAKERY JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER, DEPARTMENT OF BANKING SUPERVISION, RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK, KEEZHANTTINAL BRANCH, ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.P.B.SURESH KUMAR, SC,I.O.BANK FOR R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC.11470/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DT 2.8.10. P2 COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DT 29.10.10. P3 COPY OF THE MASTER CIRCULAR OF RBI. // True Copy // P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 11470 of 2011 G ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 31st day of August, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ According to the petitioner, she made a complaint to the first respondent making allegations against the third respondent in regard to the manner in which the bank accounts of the petitioner were allowed to be operated. It is stated that the said complaint has been forwarded to the second respondent under cover of Ext.P2 letter. It is complaining of delay in finalising the proceedings by the second respondent, the writ petition is filed. 2. I heard the counsel appearing for the petitioner and also the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the third respondent. From Ext.P2, it is seen that the complaint of the petitioner has been forwarded to the second respondent. In view of the reference made, necessarily the second respondent has to finalise the proceedings. W.P.(C) No.11470/11 : 2 : Therefore, I dispose of the writ petition without expressing anything on the merits and directing the second respondent to take a decision on the request made by Ext.P2 with notice to the parties, who are likely to be affected by such decision and as expeditiously as possible, within eight weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/31/08 // True Copy // P.A. To Judge