1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1029 OF 2010 Revnath Balu Chavan ..Applicant V/s The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ..... Mr.U.S. Malte, Advocate for applicant. Mr.S.G. Nandedkar, APP for respondent. ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE,J. DATE : 1st April, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard Mr.U.S. Malte, learned Counsel for applicant and Mr.S.G. Nandedkar, learned A.P.P. for respondent. 2. This is an application preferred by applicant seeking regular bail in connection with C.R. No.I-211/2009 registered with Kannad Police Station, Dist.Aurangabad for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code in pending Sessions Case No.37/2010 before the learned Additional Sessions Judge-3, Aurangabad, since he was arrested on 18.11.2009. 2 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the parties invited my attention to the fact that applicant had preferred application for bail earlier bearing criminal application no.255/2010. After completion of investigation, the charge sheet has been filed and the order came to be passed on 04.02.2010 and thereby the said application was partly allowed in respect of applicant nos.1 and 3 and the application in respect of applicant no.2-Revnath Balu Chavan i.e. present applicant was rejected. 4. On this scenario, learned counsel for applicant failed to point out any change in circumstance for considering the present application for bail, Since earlier application i.e. criminal application no. 255/2010 was rejected in respect of applicant herein on merits after filing of charge sheet. 5. In the result, present application being sans merits, stands dismissed. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE) JUDGE gas/cri1029.10