1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.86 OF 2010 IN MISC.PETITION NO.47 OF 2009 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.888 OF 1999 Jyotssnaqben Pranlal Doshi .. Appellant Versus Pankajkumar Pranlal Doshi & Anr. .. Respondent Mr.Dilipkumar Pranlal Doshi appellant No.2 in person. CORAM : ANIL R. DAVE, C.J. & S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 2nd March 2010. P.C.: 1] Appellant No.2 has appeared in person. He has challenged the order passed in Misc.Petition No.47 of 2009 in Testamentary Petition No. 888 of 1999. 2] Appellant No.2 has submitted that this Court should not have permitted learned Advocate Mr.Mishra to appear for the respondents. 3] The said objection was not found to be just by the learned Single 2 Judge and the learned Single Judge has finally decided that learned Advocate Mr.Mishra should be permitted to have inspection of the Court Record. 4] The aforesaid order has been challenged in this appeal. 5] In our opinion, the order passed by the learned Single Judge is just and proper. We do not find any substance in the appeal and the same is, therefore, dismissed. (CHIEF JUSTICE) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)