1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 269 OF 2008 Dnyanoba Babu Khopade & ors ........Appellants versus Anand Maruti Khopade ........ Respondent. Mr. V.D. Borwankar & Aniruddha Pratinidhi for the Appellants CORAM: RANJIT V. MORE, J. DATED : 16th OCTOBER, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Borwankar learned counsel for the appellants. The appellants are the original defendants and respondent is the original plaintiff in Regular Civil Suit No. 142 of 1995 filed for simplicitor injunction. The trial court decreed the suit and the appellant challenged the decree of the trial court by way of appeal before lower appellate court. However, same was also dismissed by the judgment and order which is impugned in the present Second Appeal. 2. Both the lower courts below concurrently held that the respondent/plaintiff is in possession of the suit property. The finding of possession in favour of the respondent/plaintiff is recorded on the basis of documentary evidence as well as admission of appellant's father. The finding of possession cannot 2 be said to be perverse. No question fo law much less substantial question of law is involved. Hence Second Appeal is dismissed. (R.V. More, J.)