IN THB HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATBILASPUR CHHAmSGARH REVIEW PETITION N0. h C- OF 2010 APPLICANT RESPONDENT NQ. 12 / RESPONDENTS ^seis°*a-iis2%,^ ^^S ^ -^ ~^ 4^!!:3n*c:l!^^.' ^\ '^ K^ '%. Dr. Pulak Jain, *" S/o Punam Jain, Aged about 26 years, R/o. 12-Mahavir Colony, Durg, District - Durg (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the Secretary, Departmeat of Health, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. ^- 4. &, Dircctorate of Medical Education, Chhattisgarh, through its Director, Raipur (CG.) Niraj Kumar Gupta, S/o not kaow to the petitioners, Aged about 28 years (roll no. 10546). Mukesh Kumar Keshetrwani, S/o not known to the petitioners, Aged about 29 years, (Roll No. 10769), Renu Chandrakar, S/o not known to the petitioners, Aged about 28 years, (roll no. 10636) Atorita Soni, D/o not known to the petitioners, Aged about 27 years, (roll no. 10163). ^.7. ManjuAgrawala, / D/o not known to the petitioners, Aged about 30 years, (rollno. 10330). ^S. Swarna Gupta, ' D/o n.ot known to the petitioners, Aged about 29 years, (roll no.10143) 9. KamalKant Sahu, ' S/o not known to the petitioners, Aged about 25 years, (roll no.10352) 1.0. Priya Verma, . - y S/o not kaown to the petitioners, Aged about 27 years, (roll no.10108) 11. Naveen Khubchandani, S/o not known to the petitioners, Aged about 28 years, (roll no.10079) 12. Rachana Daddha, D/o not knpwn to the petitioners, Agcd about 28 ycars, (roll 110. 10148) ? , ]3. Raysev Jaiswal, S/o nol known to the petitioners, Aged about 31 years, (roll no.10135) r f. 14. 15. ^' 3.6. 7. Suraan Agrawal, S/o not known to the petitioners, Aged about 29 years, (roll no. 10149). Rajesh Kumar Agrawal, S/o not known to the petitioners, Aged about 29 years, (roll no. 10519). Aditi Das, S/o not knowa to the petitioaers, Aged about 25 years, (roll no. 10558). Respondents no. 3 to 16 C/o Directorate of Medical Education Chhattisgarh, through its Director, Raipur (CG.) Thandaram Patel, S/o Shri Loknath Patel, Aged about 30 yearp, R/ o Kanchan Ganga Colony, Phase II House No. 99, Raipur (CG.) Petitioner No. 1 Arun Kumar Kedia, S/o Shri Mohan Lal Kedia, Aged about 30 years, R/o Near Tulsi Hotel, Ramniwas Talkies Chowk, Raipur (CG.) Petitioner No. 2 REVIEW APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF ORDER DATED 14/06/2010 PASSED BY THE DIVISION BENCH OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT IN W.P. (C) N0. 2364/2010 (THANDARAM PATEL AND ANOTHER VS. STATE^: CHHATTISGARH AND 16 OTHERS). a HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR REWIEWPETITION N0. 60 OF 2010 APPUCANTS RESPONDENTS Dr. Pulak Jain Versus State of Chhattisgarh and others DB:- HON'BLESHRI I.M. OUDDUSI & HON'BLE SHRI N.K. AGARWAL. JJ PRESENT:- Shri Revindra Agrawal, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Adv. General for the State. ORALORDER (28-6-2010) 1. This review petition ha§i been filed for review of the order dated 14-6-2010 on behalf of thestudent who has already taken admission after participating in the counseling before passing of the order in question. 2. There is no need to review the order dated 14-6-2010 on the ground that this review petitioner has already taken admission after participating in the counseling as the order will not affect those candidates who have already taken admission or participated in the counseling before the order in question was passed i.e. 14-6-2010. 3^_The^petition stands disposed of accordingly. Sd/- I.M.Quddusi Judge SdJ- N.K. Agarwai Judge 1