IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23388 of 2010 JULITA DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 03.08.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioner being the Mukhiya of the Gram Panchayat is apprehending her arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 420 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that the petitioner deliberately did not include the name of the complainant in the beneficiaries list of the flood affected area of Koshi. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in preparation of the beneficiaries list, the petitioner has no role of play as the same was prepared by the local B.D.O. and other officers. Learned counsel for the complainant, however, submits that the petitioner was responsible for deletion of name of the complainant. Moreover, the petitioner is also involved in committing forgery in other scheme like Indira Awas Yojna. Considering the nature of allegation and the fact that the petitioner is a lady, let 2 the petitioner, Julita Devi, be released on bail in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 1030C of 2009, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Saharsa, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. Let the complainant file an appropriate application before the learned District Magistrate, Saharsa, who will conduct a proper enquiry on the complaint of the complainant. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)