IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 6TH AUGUST 2010 / 15TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 22965 of 2010(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. THE MANAGER, T.V.J.M.H.S., PINDIMANA, CHELAD P.O., KOTHAMANGALAM. 2. V.V.SHYJA, F.T.MENIAL, T.V.J.M.H.S., PINDIMANA, CHELAD P.O., KOTHAMANGALAM. BY ADV. SRI.ABRAHAM VAKKANAL, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.PAUL ABRAHAM VAKKANAL SRI.DIJO SEBASTIAN SMT.VINEETHA SUSAN THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, ERNAKULAM 2. THE DEO, KOTHAMANGALAM. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY G.P.SRI.DILIP MOHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P(C)No.22965 of 2010 ---------------------------------------- Dated 6th August, 2010 JUDGMENT The first petitioner is the Manager and the second petitioner is the Full Time Menial, of T.V.J.M. High School, Pindimana. The first petitioner appointed the second petitioner as a Full Time Menial as per Ext.P1. However, the said order of appointment was declined to be approved by the second respondent as per Ext.P2. The first petitioner preferred an appeal against the order of rejection. The said appeal preferred by the first petitioner was rejected as per Ext.P5 by the first respondent. Now, the petitioners have taken up the matter before the third respondent by filing Ext.P9 revision petition. Ext.P9 revision petition is still pending before the third respondent. The contention of the petitioner is that in the light of Exts.P6 to P8 Government orders/circular the respondents are bound to approve the appointment of the second petitioner and in fact they have taken such contentions in Ext.P9 revision petition. In the said circumstances, taking into account the fact that Ext.P9 is pending before the third respondent, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the third respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P9 revision petition WP(C).No.22965/2010 2 expeditiously at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment with notice to the petitioners. C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge TKS