IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13737 of 2006 NANHU YADAV, SON OF NARAYAN YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KATHAULIA, P.O.- BHORE, P.S. – MUFASIL, DISTRICT – GAYA. ………. PETITIONER Versus 1. THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, REGIONAL OFFICE, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, R. BLOCK, R. NO. 6, PATNA. 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER, DAYA ENGINEERING WORK LIMITED, UNIT II, MANPUR, GAYA. …….. RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 27.04.2011 The petitioner has prayed for directing the respondents, particularly, respondent no. 1/Regional Provident Fund Commissioner to re-fix his pension. Sri Rajiv Kumar Verma, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 1/Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, submits that the position has been clarified in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no. 1. He further submits that if aggrieved the petitioner can approach the competent authority by filing representation. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file representation before the competent authority. The writ petition stands disposed of. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)