x 3 1_9 * IN THE HIGH COURT FAO 25/20L0 S.K.DUBEY & ANR OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI .....Appellants Rajeev Sharma, Advocate Through Dr. versus 3 CITI FINAAICIAL CONSUMER FINANCE LTD Through None ..... Respondent CORA]VI: HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE REI(HA SHARN{A ORDER 1.5.04.20L0 This appeal has been taken up today as April L4, 2ot0 was declared a holiday It is not disputed by learned. counsel for the appellants that the suit that was filed before the learned Additional District Judge against the arbitration award. was barred by limitation. In this view of the matter, there is no infirmity in the impugned order dated December 04, 2009. The appear, therefore, has no merit and is accordingly dismis sed. It is, however, submitted by learned counsel for the appellants that the accounts have been settled with the respondent and yet the respondent is not returning their title deeds of the mortgaged properby along with other documents. % b f Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified ' fq, I In case, as stated by counsel for the appellants, the accounts have been settled, the respond.ent is directed to return the title deeds along with the documents to the apperants. A copy of this order be given Dasti to the learned counsel for the appellants under the signatures of the court Master. A il\l I REKHA- SHARMA, J. o ApRrL Ls,2oto ka :L f