x I? \ as Executive Engineer, Bilaspur, M.P. 9. Shri LPriyadaIShi,‘ ’ Superintending Engineer, yx‘sofecial Area Development Authority, Emmi-Burg, . ' District Durg, M.P. 5. Shrirn.L.A1ya;‘ FormerVChief mecative Qfficér; Special Area Development Authority, Bnuai-mrg,’ Di‘strict burg, M.P. 1 #1: present suspended Settlemnt Office r; Béve nué Department, £bti mhal, than” ,' (mm). 7 6. Shri $t3ia Narayan aigrawél, 3 ? I Ebrmer chairman, - ; Special Area‘Development Authority; l 'Bhilai-Ddrg, District Durg, Raident af New Khnrsipar, Bhilai. § 7. Shri S.P. Singh, Collector Durg, at present pasted in Gwalior District 8. Shri Lalit Panigrahi, the —then Supe rinte nding Engines r, R SADA, mrg, at present posted - xiv in. Bilaspur DeVelopmnt Authority WT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES gg6z 222 OF 'THE ‘CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. Contd....3. f . LHC—22 7 ‘ Wmfxw %af¢aqa1r%3r ‘ Division Bench ‘ Hon’ble Shri Justice L.c. Bhadoo & Hon’ble 81m Justice V.K Srhxivastava, JJ. 23_[12I2005 When the mattsr ls calledout none present‘én behalf. of the peunonels In pursuance of the wuxt’s’ onier dated 23/ 11/2005, SPC was dilected tobe 1ssued to the petitioners and respondents No.3 to 7. SPC of the petitioners- have not been received served or unserved. In pursuance of the Comt’s order dated 23/ 1 1/2005 SPC was issued on 26/ 11/2005 an Smt Shaslu Agrawal Advocate appears on behalf of the respond nt No 3 and subnnts that name of the respondent No 3 has been c anged Shn ’ Santosh Ya u, Advocate appears on behalf of the respondent No 4 Shn Ayt Smgh Adv ate appears on behalf of Shn P Diwakar s Sr Advocate for respondent No 6 Shn Sanjay K. Agrawal, Advocate appears on behalf of ‘ respondents No. 8 and 9. ‘ SPC was also issued to the petitioners on the given address, but ‘ no representah'on is made. r /" The petition is dismissed for non-pmsecutgiV" a . SOV— \l wage T7 2 \ *X $“t'Nasia L.C.BHADOO i Judge I y / / t \ma‘l K“ [11% éfel‘r m j \ "