IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16499 of 2011 1. HARIHAR BHAGAT 2. SHANTI DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 20.06.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioners being the parents of the husband are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 304B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the marriage was performed six years prior to the occurrence, which gets reflected from the F.I.R also. There was demand of motorcycle and for non-fulfillment of the same, the victim was killed. It is submitted by learned counsel for the informant that all the family members connived in eliminating the victim. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the victim was suffering from some abdominal problems and due to which she died. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the 2 informant that no document to that effect was produced by the petitioners' side. Considering the fact that petitioners are old parents of the husband and the thrust of accusation is against the husband, let the above named petitioners, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Bhorey P.S. Case No. 58/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)