IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1976 of 2006 GOPAL LAL S/o Late Rajo Lal resident of village – Bakhtiarpur, Station Road, P.O. and P.S.-Bakhtiarpur, District- Patna. . . . . . Plaintiff-Petitioner. Versus 1. JAGDISH SAO S/o Late Ramchandra Sao, 2. Bharat Sao, S/o Jagdish Sao, 3. Nandu Sao, 4. Santosh Sao, Both are sons of Late Brahmdeo Sao. All are residents of Village- Bakhtiarpur, P.O. and P.S.- Bakhtiarpur, District- Patna. . . . . . . Defendants- Opposite Parties. ----------- 2/ 21.07.2009 After some argument learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission is accorded. This application is dismissed as withdrawn. It has been pointed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petition under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure restraining the other side from making construction upon the suit property is still pending and the suit is also pending since long. In view of the aforesaid submission court below is directed to dispose of the aforesaid petition filed by the petitioner-plaintiff under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure within two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, if the same is still pending. Uday/ ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J. )