(1) CRLA No.40 of 2013 With Bail application no.130/2013 (2) CRLA No.41/2013 With Bail Application No.131/2013 (3) CRLA No.38/2013 With Bail Application No.132/2013 & (4) CRLA No.39 of 2013 With Bail application no.133/2013 Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J. Mr. H.S. Dhillon, Advocate for the applicants/appellants in all the matters. Mr. V.K. Gemini, Dy. Adv. General (Cri.) for the State. Learned counsel, instead of commencing his arguments on the merits of appeals, only pressed for the bail applications, though the matters are fixed for final hearing. However, having heard the learned counsel to an extent, it appears that this is a case of robbery on the open road. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the Court is not inclined to grant bail to any of the applicants. Accordingly, all the bail applications are hereby rejected. When the learned counsel was asked to put forth his arguments on the merits of appeals, he sought for a date. As prayed for by learned counsel for the appellants, list this matter, along with connected cases, after two weeks. (Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.) 24.03.2014 Rdang