BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Saturday, the Twenty Ninth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.9883 of 2011 1. ABUKHAN 2. SAIBUNISHA ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 & 2 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ENAMKULATHUR POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.58 OF 2011 ) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. M.NAVEEN KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) For Intervenor : M.R.SREENIVASAN, Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- When the matter was came up for hearing on 28.10.2011, there was no representation on the side of the petitioners. Therefore, the matter is posted today under the caption 'For dismissal'. Today also there is no representation for the petitioners. It shows that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting this case. Hence, this petition is dismissal for default. sd/- 29/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ENAMKULATHUR POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT. 2. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. M/S.M.R.SREENIVASAN, Advocate SR.No.37093 SR : 01.11.2011 : 1P/4C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9883 of 2011 Date :29/10/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/