IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR C.A.F. 2038/2010 IN F.A. 799/2010 Sadashiv Bhojane ..vs.. Babarao Marotrao Thakare & ors Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or judges Orders. CORAM: SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE: 2 /12 / 2010 Heard Shri Bhattad the learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Deshpande, the learned advocate for the non applicants. The trial court has held that the applicant is not in possession of the suit property and has also not paid the amount of more than Rs.2,00,000/- to the non applicants/ vendors, towards the consideration. It is also difficult to believe that the respondents/vendors had parted with the possession of the property in favour of the appellant at the time of agreement of sale as the property was allegedly agreed to sold for a consideration of Rs.3,25,000/- and only a sum of Rs.50,000/- was said to be paid at the time of execution of the agreement of sale. It is necessary to note that though the applicant has claimed possession over the suit property, in pursuance of the agreement of sale, the agreement of sale is an unregistered document. In such circumstances, temporary injunction cannot be granted in favour of the applicants. The civil application stands rejected. JUDGE SMP.