Cr.M.M.O No. 24 of 2010. 4.5.2010Present: Ms. Vidushi Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Bhasin, Advocate, for the respondent. The petitioner has challenged condition No. 2 of the order passed on 15.1.2010 in an interlocutory application, seeking suspension in Criminal Appeal No. 3- R/10 of 2010, pending in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Shimla Camp at Rohru, being unjust and unreasonable. The bonds in terms of condition No. 1 stand furnished. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the cheque amount was adjusted and to that effect evidence was led in the trial Court which fact was not considered by the learned trial Court in the right perspective thus, the appeal has been filed. Contra learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the appropriate orders be passed in the matter. Considered. The cheque amount is alleged to be liquidated and findings are questioned in this appeal therefore, the second condition in the order impugned appears to be excessive and unreasonable. -2- In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, it is modified to the extent that the petitioner shall deposit Rs.50,000/- out of the fine amount in the trial Court on or before 15.6.2010. The matter stands finally disposed of. Cr.M.P. No. 85/2010. In view of the above order, the interim order dated 29.1.2010 stands vacated. The application stands disposed of. Order Dasti. May 4, 2010 (Surinder Singh),J (cm)