COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH AT BILASPUR DSVSSiON HON'BLESHRJRAJEEVGUPTA,CJ. . HON'BLE SHRS SUNIL KUSVIAR SINHA, J. s> Appeliants CIaimants Non-aDDlicants Respondents Non-applicants M.C.C.No. 300 012010 1. Budhardas Dahariya, aged about 52 years, son of Perdeshi Dahariya 2. Kumari Ertln, aged 16 years, D/o Budhardas Daharlya 3. Hemraj Dahariya, aged 1 4 years (Minor) son of Budhardas Dahariya on behalf of Minors applicant No.2 and 3 through their naturai guardian appiicant No.1 Budhardas Dahariya ail R/o Viilage Akoii, Post Khudmuda, PS Berla, Tahsil Bemetara, District Durg (CG) Versus 1. Rajesh Das Manikpuri, aged 22 years, S/o Vishaldas Manikpurl, Occupation Driver, R/o Village Muraithi, PS Dharsinwa, Tahsil and District Raipur 2. Mayaram Yadu, aged 38 years, S/o Vlshveshwar Yadu, R/o Village Muralthi, Post Siltara, PS Dharsinwa, Tahsii and District Ralpur (CG) 3 The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., through Divisiona! Manager, Divisional Office, No.1 Kachhari Chowk, Jail Road, Raipur (CG) Poiicy No.9581 Policy year 2008 Deveiopment Officer Code 34, period from 20.02.2008 to 19.02.2009 ADplicatioo for restoratlon Present: Ms. Maya Verma, learned counsel for the petltioners. n / ORDER (29th July, 2010) The foliowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, CJ. Ms. Maya Verma, learned counse! for the petitioners is heard on the restoration petition. 2) The petitioners are seeklng restoration of M.A.C. No.392/2010, which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide orderdated 15.04.2010. 3) On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsei for the petitioners and the grounds taken in the restoration petition, we are satisfied that the absence of the petitloners' counsel on 15.04.2010 when M.A.C. No.392/2010 was taken-up for hearing was based on bona fide grounds. 4) M.C.C.No.300/2010, therefore, is allowed and M.A.C. No.392/2010 Is restored to its originai number.r Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge subbu