1-.-^J-^° IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (Sl. No. tA^ of 2009 s8i1SSs PETITIONER Bharat Lal Awasthi, S/o Late Shri .-,-^ ^. Ramphal Awasthi, aged about 55 I'x^?-.-:"''^^'--^ years,Upper Division Teacher, .'^•y^^..-1^^ .....•••""" Govt. Higher Secondary School; Korba, Block-District-Korba (C.G.) ^••••'^^:-'^i^9" lys^-^ A8S-'" VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1: State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretaiy, Tribal Welfare Departmeht, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department, District- Korba (C.G.) <-" ;; :! ' 3. Block Education Officer Korba, District-Korba (C.G.) 4. Prineipal, Govemment Higher Secondary School, Korba, District-Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITmON OF INDIA w :-KI:« HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR SB : HON'BLESHRI JUSTICB PRITIHKER DIWAKBR W.JP.ISl N0. 4286/2009 PETITIONBR Bharat Lal Awasthi Versus RBSPONDENTS StateofC.G.fiE Others WIUT PETmON UMDER ARTICLE 236 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF moiA Aopearaace: Shri K.S.Pawar, counsel for the petitioner. Ms. SunitaJain, P.L. for the State. ORALORDER (11.08.2009) With the consent of leamed counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally. By way of this petition the petitioner is seeking regular pay scale on the post of Assisfant Teacher. Counsel for the petitioner. submits that number df identical petitions: have been decided by this Court and the issue involved ,is a concluded one. He has also referred to one of the orders in W.P.(S) No. 813/2007 (Ram KumarSahu V. Stateof Chhattisgarh) in which regular pay scale was granted fronn the date of initial appointment. Counsel for the respondents/State submits that in the light of the judgment of this Court the petitioner may make a representation to the authorities concemed and the same woyld be decided after scrutinizing the factual and legal position. Thus it is directed that if the petitioner makesl a representation to the authorities concemed within a period of fhree weeks fcom the date of receipt of copy of this order, tbe same shall be decided within a further period of one month fijom thedate of its receipt. . ; With the aforesaidobservations, the petition is disposed;of. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge <