!: "- ^ HI6H COU&T OF CHHATTES6ARH AT BILASPU& Writ Petition (5) No. 2763 of 2008 Petition&r Versus R&spondsnts 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Prariay Verma, ogedl obout 29 yepr^, son of 5hri S. K. Verma. residait of Tor-wa ^jruriarmk Chowk, BSb^pur, Tahsi! and Distrsct Bilaspur (C6) The State of Chhattisgarh, through The Secrstary, Losnd Revenue Department, D. K. S< Bhawon, Raipur {CG} Jhs Commissjoner, Land Records, Chhattisgar-h, Raipur (CS\ The SuperintendenT, Uand Records. Bilaspur (C5) Tha CoHisctor ^ond Rfecord) Bsbspur (C.6.) Ajay {^umar Soni, son of Ayodhya Prasad Soni, dged about 28 years, R/o, Lormi, Tah. Lormi Distt. Bilaspur {C.6.} WRFT PETmON UN&ER ARTECLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTuTZON OF IN&ZA Single Beneh : Hon'bie Mr. Sotish K. Agnihotpj. J. Shri Ashok Soni, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Smitha 6hai, Pan&l Lawy&r for the responcSersts No. 1 to 4. ORAL ORDER (Pssssd on this 18th da>' of JuSy, 2008) 1. Wsth th& con^&nt of learn&d counsBl appearina for the par-ti&s, 1Jrie petition i5 heard finfilly. 2. Learned coun^S appearing for the patition&r subfriit^ that th& petitioner doe.s not want to pre^s this p&tition Gn m&rst5, at this ^ z- ^tag^- Rowfivsr, the concarn^d authorities iricr/ b& dir&cted to consid&r and decide th& repi^^&ritQtions doted 28.4.2007 (AnniBXure P/10) and 18.7.2007 (Annexur-e P/ll), pending bafor& the Respondent Mo.4, in accordance with Saw, wi-Him •rt-.e prsscribed time. 3. Learned coun^e} appeuring for th& r&^pond&rits/StGtB submit^ that the pending represe.ntatlons ahail bs consid&re.d and cSecided by the conc&rn&d authority, sn accordance with lawu, on ita own m&rits, within u p&rioc! of one srionth from Ifie dats of r^c&ipt of o copy of ths^ ord&r< 4. In view of th& forsgosng, no^ing aurvives in tha matt&r- 5< AccordinySy, the patition stands dispos&d of. No ordar asto costs. h^^ Thakur Sd/- SatishK-Agnihotri Judge