IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.5486 of 2010 Date of decision: 20.9.2010 Raja Ram …..Appellant versus Smt.Bimla and another ……Respondents CORAM: Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jasbir Singh Hon’ble Mr.Justice Augustine George Masih Present: Mr.Sudhir Aggarwal, Advocate for the appellant Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral) Vide the impugned order, application of the appellant to set aside an ex-parte order granting an amount of Rs.500/- only towards maintenance to his child, was dismissed. The Court below has found that the explanation given by the appellant for not appearing on a particular date is not justified. Be that as it may, age of son of the appellant is about eight years and he is residing with his mother i.e. respondent No.1. It appears that a very meager amount of Rs.500/- towards maintenance has been granted, which is on the lower side. We do not incline to interfere at the instance of the appellant. It is also not coming out from record whether arrears have been paid or not. No case is made out for interference. Dismissed. (Jasbir Singh) Judge 20.09.2010 (Augustine George Masih) gk Judge