IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24257 of 2008 BINAY KUMAR & ORS. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.7.2008 As prayed for, the learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary corrections in the prayer portion of the petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case No.234/2007 for the alleged offences registered under sections 341, 323, 379, 504 and 353 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the allegation attributed against the petitioners is baseless. As a matter of fact, during distribution of relief materials on account of the irregularities being committed by the concerned Panchayat Sachiv etc., the petitioners objected and there was some hot exchange of words and except that nothing happened. However, the Panchayat Sachiv lodged the First Information 2 Report with the false allegation only to harass the petitioners. It is further submitted that the police during investigation did not find such assault or taking away the alleged watch etc. Considering the submissions, as noticed above, and on perusal of the allegations made in the F.I.R. as well as the other materials brought on record, it is directed that all the petitioners, namely, Binay Kumar, Babloo Kumar @ Bablu Prasad and Pappu Kumar, in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case No.234/2007 within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Patna City, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)