:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE FIRST APPEAL NO.755 OF 1993 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 756 OF 1993 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 759 OF 1993 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 763 OF 1993 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.764 OF 1993 -------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders -------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Anturkar for the applicants/respondents. Mr. Suresh Sabrad for Appellants. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 22.12.2005 . These appeals are circulated again for stay of the judgment dated 13/14- December, 2005, passed in the above matter. 2. In view of the order passed in :2: First Appeal No.755 of 1993, the learned Counsel appearing for the applicants in this appeal now praying for stay of the order and also seeking time to vacate the premises. As the issues are same and basically the respective defendants Trust and trustees, I am inclined to grant time to vacate the premises on the same footing, if they have not already vacated. 3. At the request of the advocate appearing for the appellant/plaintiff and as consented by the learned advocate for the respondents, time to vacate the premises, if not already vacated, is granted for six months subject to the appellant filing an usual undertaking along with all other adult members, who are occupying the premises in question within four weeks from today as a condition precedent for time to vacate :3: the premises. Failing which the respondents/original plaintiffs are at liberty to proceed in accordance with the law to take possession. (ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.]