^ ^ tl tri 's^a. -^^. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHRATHSGARH AT BILA^PUR W.P.NO. j2.|2- / 2004' Petitioner Versus Respondents ^^ M} ^.i 1. 2. 3. 4. Dilip Kuraar Pandey S/o Late Komal Kumar Pandey Aged about 23 years, R/o Moti Talab Para Near B.Damodar Petrol Purap, Jagdalpur, Dist: Bastar-(C.G-) State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretaiy Forest Departanent Mantralaya, Raipur-(C.G.) The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest (Administration), Raipur-(C.G-) The Conservator of Forest Jagdalpur Circle, Jagdalpur-(C.G.) The Divisional Forest Officer, Bastar (General Forest Division) Jagdalpur Dist: Bastar-(C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 5. The CoUector Jagdalpur, Dist: Bastar-(C.G.) 7 227/OF' OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA _-J^—^^3^ XI-HC-22 ^5ET -^T?TT^n, ^tn7T%. f^TRfqT W^C'TT ^)^Tf<=h 371^ •CH^^ ^-(^^[7-\^/^ '^T, 21)0 f^-^y" .^r^i ^ f?7ri^~<RT^T -5^W^f^T ^' t- 3JT^r ^Rn'^R 'RfeT 21-12-2005 Petitioner by Shri (^^c^t^f @^i4 Shri P.S, Koshy, Dy. Adv. Generalj Heard. This case relates to compassional employee sen/ing in the State. Leamed counsel for the petitionerj the employee has occurred on or after 1-1 in batch ofcases bearingW.P. No. 1322/2p02 passed by this Court on 20/12/2005. He atso. Learned counsel forthe State doe^ of Chhattisgarh has taken a decision employees who died on or after 1/11/199"j that time. In view of the submissions madj without expressing any opinion on the me| Justice will be sen/ed if a direction is j concerned to consider and decide the c^se prevalent at the time of death of the appointment.orders will be issued as petitioner is also directed to render due cd- any gnevance stilt remains, the petition^r ! including filing of the petition before this Cjourt. With the aforesaid observations. Certified copy as per rules. Copy to the State counset. who j respondents for compliance. / :e appointment consequent upon the death of an ^ ^ ^ •^T^T^t^ ^Tr^ff ^ ftTZl' <fa^d!< -^ •3:rf^R ^T^T' f\^A^ Advocate. for the State. jcategoricatly stated that in this case, the death of 1 -1997 and not eartier. It is further submitted that invotving the same question orders have been ^rays that similar orders may be passed in this case not dispute the above fact and state that the State to consider the cases of dependants of those strictly in acco.rdance with the policy prevalent at Ip by leamed counsel appearing for the parties, |"its of the case, in the opinion ofthis Court, ends of to the State of Chhattisgarh and the authorities of the petitioner in accordance with the policy em^loyee concemed. If the petitioner found eligibte, as possible on or before 30 April, 2006. The -operation to the authorities. tt is made clear that if ^r may avail the remecty availabte under the law c^se earjy thisis petition stands disposed of. will be obtiged to communicate the order to the Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge .^ .fe^ Bift.