1 upa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.2078 OF 1986 SUIT NO.2078 OF 1986 SUIT NO.2078 OF 1986 Narendra Mafatlal Mehta carrying on ) business in the firm name and style ) of M/s.N.Mehta & Co. ).. Plaintiffs Versus M/s.Hindustan Industrial & Electrical ) Engineers and another ).. Defendants Mr.Ketan A. Chothani for the Plaintiffs. None present for Defendant No.1. Mr.N.M. Shah for Defendant No.2. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 18TH APRIL 2006 DATED : 18TH APRIL 2006 DATED : 18TH APRIL 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The Plaintiffs have filed the present Suit to recover an amount of Rs.90,500/- with interest at the rate of 18% per annum. 2. The Plaintiffs sold and delivered goods to Defendant No.1 pursuant to the order placed by Defendant No.1. These goods were delivered on the basis of two invoices, one dated 8th April 1983 for an amount of Rs.1,48,500/- and another dated 11th April 1983 for an amount of Rs.85,000/-. The aggregate amount of the goods worth Rs.2,33,500/- were sold and delivered by the 2 Plaintiffs to Defendant No.1. The Plaintiffs have filed copies of the invoices and the letter issued by Defendant No.2 indicating that an amount of Rs.90,500/- remained to be paid by Defendant No.1 from the total sum of Rs.2,33,500/-. Defendant No.1 placed orders for goods and made payments through Defendant No.2. 3. The documents support the case made out by the Plaintiffs. There is no Written Statement nor is any appearance filed on behalf of Defendant No.1. 4. Hence, decree as prayed for against Defendant No.1 only.