HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23055 of 2009 Date: 17th February 2010 Between: Smt. Vuppu Challa Rani. … Petitioner And The District Collector, West Godavari District & others. … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23055 of 2009 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 and 2, and also the learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3. 2. An extent of Ac.1-21 gts. of land in Survey No.182/2 of Kadakatla village in Tadepalligudem Mandal of West Godavari District, is notified for acquisition, along with other lands, for the purpose of construction of 2nd Over Bridge and by-pass road from Eluru road to K.N.Road. In the notice issued in Form-5A, the 3rd respondent’s name is mentioned as owner. In this writ petition, it is the grievance of the petitioner that as she is the owner of the land in question, it is obligatory on the part of respondents to mention her name by issuing necessary amendment to the Proceedings, dated 15.07.2009, issued in ROC.No.G2/269/07 (General). 3. From the proceedings on record, precisely, it is the grievance of the petitioner that though she is the rightful owner of property by virtue of a Will, but the same is notified in the name of respondent No.3 and further steps are being taken for passing of Award in favour of respondent No.3. 4. On instructions, it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 and 2 that the Award is not yet passed, and that after the award inquiry, the petitioner has also submitted a representation and appeared before the 2nd respondent-Land Acquisition Officer. 5. As much as the Award is not yet passed, I permit the petitioner to place on record before the 2nd respondent, the documents and title deeds, in proof of her claim for award of compensation with regard to Ac.1.21 gts. of land covered by Sy.No.182/2, situated at Kadakatla village in Tadepalligudem Mandal of West Godavari District. On filing such documents, the 1st respondent is directed to give notice to the petitioner as well as respondent No.3 and take further steps for passing of Award. It is made clear that the claims of respondent No.3 and the petitioner shall be decided on their own merits, without being influenced by any of the observations made in this order. 6. Subject to the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 17th February 2010 ajr