f^St^^Ssa^.ssigssssi ^ THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) W. P. N0. OF 2004 PETITIONERS ^ ^ ^ ,%' y 'y •^ ^/ y ^' 1. Sant Ram Sahu, S/o Shri Natthuram Sahu, aged 42 Years, Occupation -Service, Presently posted as Asstt. Sub Inspector, Krishi Upaj Mandi, Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh [Chhattisgarh] 2. Ramji Vaishnav, S/o Shri Garib Das Vaishnav, aged about 34 years, Occupation - Service, Presently posted as Asstt. Sub Inspector, Krishi Upaj Mandi, Nagari, District Rajnandgaon [C.G] 3. Kishore Masih, S/o Shri Laxman, aged about 46 years,0ccupation - Service, Presently posted as Asstt. Sub Inspector, Krishi Upaj Mandi, Nagari, District Rajnandgaon [C.G] 1 ~k L^ F???A'r?J •<-^^ ,4. Mohan Lal Yadav, S/o Shri Mangloo Ram Yadav, aged about 46 years, Occupation - Ser^ice, Presently posted as Asstt. Sub Inspector, Krishi Upaj M:andi, Nagari, District Rajnandgaon [C.G] 5. Laxmi Prasad Soni, S/o Shri Chhedi Lal Soni, aged about 42 years, Occupation ~ Ser/ice, Presently posted as Asstt. Sub Inspector, Krishi Upaj Mandi, 1^1^-^p.i^District Bilaspur [CHhattisgarh] 6. Vishnu Verma, S/o Shri Devnath Verma, aged 35 years,0ccupation - Ser^ice, Presently posted as Asstt. Sub Inspector, Krishi Upaj Mandi, Kasdol, District Raipur [Chhattisgarh] ^a 9 ^^—•^^, ^^\^ 3?r;.-...."""^ •^^ ^13^'"^ -•.. / 7. Arun Verma, S/o Shri Neel Kanth Verma, aged 39 yrs., Occupation - Service, Presently posted as Asstt. Sub Inspector, Krishi Upaj Mandi, Kasdol, District Raipur [Chhattisgarh] 8. Kishan Lal Nishad, S/o Late Shri Bisahu R Nishad aged about 44 years, Occupation - Sen^ice, Presently posted as Asstt. Sub Inspector, Krishi Upaj Mandi, Kurud, District Dhamtari [Chhattisgarh] 9. Ram Kumar Sahu, S/o Shri H. K. Sahu, aged 40 years, Occupation Service, Presently posted as Asstt. Sub Inspector, Krishi Upaj Mandi, Raipur, District Raipur [Chhattisgarh] 10. Ghanshyam Yadu, S/o Shri Natthu Lal Yadu, aged about 39 years, Occupation - Ser^ice, Presently posted as Asstt. Sub Inspector, KrishiUpaj Mandi, Bagbahara, District Raipur [Chhattisgarh] 11. Shiv Narayan Singh, S/o Shri Raju Singh, aged about 39 years, Occupation - Service, Presently posted as Asstt. Sub Inspector, Krishi Upaj Mandi, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja [Chhattisgarh] 12. Abdul Quadir Ansari, S/o Shri Abdul Zafar, aged 46 years, Occupation- Service, Presently posted as Asstt. Sub Inspector, Krishi Upaj Mandi, Surajpur, District Surguja [Chhattisgarh] 13. Ram Pratap Sahu,S/o Shri Chova Lal Sahu aged about 40 years, Presently posted as Asstt. Sub Inspector, Krishi Upaj Mandi, Rajim [C.G.] 14. Thakur Ram Chandrakar, S/o Bisahu R.Chandrakar, aged about 37 years, Occupation - Service, Presently posted asAsstt. Sub Inspector, Krishi Upaj Mandi, Bagbahara, District Raipur [Chhattisgarh] 15. Milan Ram Verma, S/oShri Pooran Lal Verma, aged 44 years, Occupation -Service, Presently posted as Asstt. Sub Inspector, Krishi Upaj Mandi, Kusumi, District Rajnandgaon [C.G] 16. Mohammed Late Fakir aged about Occupation Yusuf, S/o Mohanimed, 35 years, Service, Presently posted as Asstt. Sub Inspector, Krishi Upaj Mandi, Rajim, District Dhamtari [Chhattisgarh] 17. Bharat Das Vaishnav, S/o Bhagwat Das Vaishnav, aged about 42 years, Occupation - Service, Presently posted as Asstt. Sub Inspector, Krishi Upaj Mandi,Baloda Bazar, Distt. Dhamtari [Chhattisgarh] :^: IS.Ramadhar Sahu, S/o Shri Ratan Das Sahu, aged about 46 years, Occupation - Service, Presently posted as Asstt. Sub Inspector, Krishi Upaj Mandi, Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipur [Chhattisgarh] 19.Pramod Kumar Sharma, S/o Sri Ramgopal Sharma, aged about 38 years, Occupation - Service, Presently posted as Asstt. Sub Inspector, Krishi Upaj Mandi, Rajim, District Dhamtari [Chhattisgarh] VERSUS RESPONDEKLTS 1. Chhattisgarh Rajya Krishi Vipanan Board, a body Constituted under CG Krishi Upaj Mandi Adhiniyaml972,through its Managing Director, Purani Ganjmandi Parisar, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Raipur Mandi through its Chairman, Raipur Mandi Dist. Raipur [Chhattisgarh] 3. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Balpda Bazar through its Chairman, Baloda Bazar District Raipur [C G] 4. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Kasdol Mandi through its Chairman, Kasdol Mandi, Distt. Raipur [C G] ^:....,.'^ /{^l^5 ^:L 5. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Ambikapur through its Chairman, Ambikapur District Surguja [CG] 6. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Bagbahara through its Chairman, Bagbahara, Distt.Raipur[Chhattisgarh] 7. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Kurud through its Chairman, Kurud District Dhamtari [Chhattisgarh] 8. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Rajim Mandi through its Chairman, Rajim Mandi District Raipur [C G] 9. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samifi Kusumi Mandi through its Chairman, Kusumi Mandi Dhamtari [Chhattisgarh] 10. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Sarangarh through its Chairman, Sarangarh District Raigarh [C G] ll.Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Nagari Mandi through its Chairman, Nagari Mandi Dist. [C G] 12. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Takhatpur through its Chairman, Takhatpur District Bilaspur [C G] 13. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Surajpur through its Chairman, Surajpur District Surguja [C G] WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR QRDERS: „„_-_ _--nvi—— XI-HC—78 ^i^^T^te WW<R^¥r%TO^ *liN€?ll5h<4jch '3'^' '^WW'ti, ^Tll-H^ f®|dl^l^< ^^^).P. ^G-^^...... g^^^...........................-...^...........^ ^^ ^ ^^I^T'q^R' (^cif^Sl^) <^nw^f??i 3?n^? 30.06.2004 SIuiManmdra Shrivastavs Slui Kanbir Singli, C^)uns^l Heard. Tlie matter is such wherc Vipa4aa Djaily Cliliattisgarh Rajya Kristu Petiliouei-s weit? workiug ais rcgularbcd on 27.5.2002. coxnplauits axid iii fhc xxicctsng o| acrutinissed ond fhe deciaion to r^gulorize haa been taken, pie petitionere who arc workir^ m Board are being dercgularized, Wage Euiployees, They weit; Fhjc Board faas rcccivcd ccrtain to dcrcgulaiizcc artd rclcgate Wo^c Eniployccs is agaiast Leamed couiisel aubinits fhat ttt< of fhe Suprexae Court reportedj Pereiikar -V- State of Goa and 1 has been held as under:- The manner in W7 70QQ^nm»inh»Tnr,\ c^l<4^<4lv} '^MW ^ 'fe^^i^R ^3ffiR3iT^[ counsel tbr the petitioaers. for rcspondents/Board. Boeird of Dircctors fhc axxattcr v^as Lcarucd counscl for tfac f3|ctitfoncr subxaitsi fhat fhc dccision ffattm to fhc prcvious status of Dafly 'pic priiicipal of natural jiiaticc. niatter is covered by fhe decision in 1999 1 SCC 378 (Gaianon L. |aaoftieri wheie in paragraph 8, it ui/fnch the order dcxted 21.1.1999/ te was, tosay the teasi, notproper. ^--..sasa XI-HC—78 ^STT^T ^T f^TW ^^T 3^^TsFRh? NlfrKtl »»*il<^ "^sf -qiqicn^, ^tii^j4i<o, T®i<ns<H^< .^.&.^/M..:... -^200 3?TI^TTR^ (y<(^<^T) '^TTWHi^^H^I - V- dif The appeltantwas denitde^ 16.2:1994unheccrd. There o/ natural justioe and a wd^l earlier order made in fava^r 16.2.199f wcis resanded iff the dppellcmt to show csppellant as Headfrwster daied 16.3.1994 had not procsedings by emy pcvty <jd oould rwt have been (afcen affbrding him any absorption as Headmasier ^ isssue. 77ie prirusples of nut^ thjffir hreajch^ Thj^ ordter made by ihe respondents\ contained in para 2 of the ^ obser^ations^ we have for. In the fads and daied 21.1.1999/22.1.199^ acoardxngly set it aside. A plam readiag offhe abov^ in laaue. Learaed coiiasel for the deeteion of M.P. High Court in Goswaixd aiid ofhers -Vs- State reported m2004M.P.S.T. 49 whe^ ^^ncoltotton of rogiitori%ation oiril chi^fcn<i1i 'RHI^if ^f Fs^l <p3i<^i< '^'3tfTO3T^T of tfw benefits of the order dated fias been a brecwh of ihe prindpte ^cstion offair play in acfion. The favc^r af the appellant as early as on ^iihDui giving any opporhmity to oau^e against it Absofption of tiw Govt High School by Ihe order \been put in isszie ffvrough any any point of ttme. Thea benefit \away frwn the appellant withoui opporhjtpity of hecsring, even where the fcfihe High School kad been put in of nut^rciljustica fuwe beenrespected in d^xted ^7.7.7999/ ^.7.7999 waft inftuerwed by the obseryations ^rder ofHigh Court (supra), which cdre^dy found^ were not cct cdl called of ihe case, Ihe order ocinnof be suslcdned and we araJtmslanoes shcws ffaat thc benefit could aot havc bccii snatchcsd fixxoi fhc pcti^ioncrs wifhout afEbrdiag him. aay opportunily ofhcariag, cvcn v^hcr^ his rcgulanzation had bccn put Ipetitioner fturther reUed on a b siiuilar case of Radha Mohan of Madhya Rradesh aod ofhere it h^s been heM tlaat in case of rieht hod b e«M»- XI-HC—78 -^? ^w ^4T^^?^:?T^ ^ 'WR^T^W^ T5c[ ^TRT^PT, ^•<li'IHll'o, [sK'll'y^ ..te...3...^....^K/...^ ^, •"^200 sTi^T-'??^ (-^^r) -'*>' fhe pctitioner aad it w^ inci cause notice to tfae petitioners Learaed counsel for the incilimbent ajnd gifen ordere have not yet been opportunity of hearing and aftejr xnay be passed, lu view of this subiiussioti aud ni vtew of the dcdhsk>u»cAted satuic po^aibty above, fhe petitioners niay inal^s rcprcskcn.tati.ons arc filcd, fhc by the Board as earfy as fhex^eafter, after heoring fhe decision i®taken, fhe petitioner^ Wifh tihis obseryation, fhi^ Consequenfly, appHcatio4 disposed of. C^ V^< ^i^lj C.C.as pernries. \^ ^psit^f^ 'w^rf ^ 'fe^ <psi^i< ^? ^ff^H 3TT^T upoH tfaem to issuc show consider IIieir objections. petitioners fasrfy submit that tfae and tfaey may be given due hearing them indlvidualty, orders representatioais and ia case such afaaUbc con»idcrcdaad decidcd preferabfy wifhioi 2 xnonllia petitionere individuatfy, TiU the may be conthiued, petitioii staods disposed of. for ad-interfan reUef alsa ^taads C fywh(C^Se) Q>ft^-^ 8d/- Fakhruddin Judge ^^ ^