v IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIIASPUR WRIT PETITION (e».)NO. j^^ /2009 ShiQle Beiieh PETITIONERS 2. Sameer Arya @ Jamir Ahamad Rizvi, S/o Aggan Ahamad Rizvi, Aged about 32 years, R/o Kasarideeh Chowk, Durg, Distt. Durg (CG) Tanushree Tiwari, D/o Shri HC Tiwari, Aged about 22 years, R/o Aadarsh Nagar, Kasarideeh Chowuk,' Durg, Distt. Durg (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^€&^:^ .^•••A' <'*fc.'.-%" ... ^<^P,^.--2 ^•^^^?"^"" ' .jjlj -^^ ^-^- State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Home (Police), DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, . Raipur District Raipur (CG) Inspector General of Police, Police Headquarters, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG) Superintendent of Police, District Durg (CG) Station House Officer, Police Station - City Kotwali, Durg, Distt. Durg (CG) Shri HC Tiwari, R/o Aadarsh Nagar, Kasarideeh Chowk, Durg, Distf. Durg (CG) \ 2-2.<«^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE SS?- OF THE . CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The RetitinrLers^- aha^wp -namo^i- m^ot-__i.....-j~^-.^. —-' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Cr) No. 1947 of2009 PETmONER : Sameer Arya @ Jamir Ahamad Rizvi & another. VERSUS. RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarli & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER , TICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmJTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Me Shi-i Satish K. Asnihotri. J, Present: Dr. FouziaMirza, Adyocate for the petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for the Stat&fespondent No. 1 to 4. Shri T.K.Tiwai-i, Advocate for the respondent No. 5. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 22"'' day of November, 2010) Leanied counsel appearing for the respondent No. 5 submits that thei-e is no question of any harassment or tlireat eitiier to fhe petitioner No. 1 or petitioner No. 2 as they are adults and they are free to live as they like. In view offhe above submission, accorduig to leamed counsel for the petitioners, nothing survives for adjudication m this petition at this stage. • Accordingly, the writ petition is disinissed. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Ainit