1 10 wp 2396.11.doc srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2396 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders. Mr. Pradhyuman M. Bhagat for Petitioners. Mrs. S.V.Bharucha for Respondents. CORAM : K.K.TATED,J. DATE : 13/06/2011 PC: Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Rule made returnable immediately by consent of the parties. By this Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner is challenging the order dated 12th October, 2010 2 10 wp 2396.11.doc passed by the learned Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Regional Office, Mumbai – 1 under section 14-B of the Employees’ Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 and the visit note dated 30th March, 2009. Admittedly, there is a provision of appeal under the Act to challenge the order passed by the authority under section 14-B of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. As alternative remedy is available, I do not find any reason to entertain this writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Same is rejected. (K.K.TATED,J.)