IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2214 of 2008 RAMANAND PRASAD & ORS Versus LAGANDEO PRASAD & ANR ----------- 2. 15.1.2009 Surendra/ For the facts and reasons mentioned in I.A.No. 7782/2009 the delay in filing of this civil revision application is condoned. Coming to the merits of this case, in the opinion of this Court the intervention sought by the petitioners in a suit being contested between the plaintiff opposite party and the State of Bihar was not required. The court below in fact has also taken into consideration that Parwana Bandobasti allegedly granted by the Ex- landlord in favour of the petitioners was not in respect of the same land. Be that as it may, in the event the petitioners have any claim on the basis of the aforementioned Parwana Bandobasti they may file their own suit but that cannot be a ground for their impleadment in the suit filed by the plaintiff opposite party. There being no error in the order, this application is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.)