THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 4256 OF 2008 ORDER: The petitioner who is a tenant, filed the present revision under Section 22 of the A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1960, seeks to assail the orders dismissing the appeal filed by him in RCA No.6 of 2003 as against the orders passed by Rent Controller. Briefly the facts of the case are that the landlord has filed the eviction case in respect of a premises, which is residential one, on the ground of wilful default and for personal requirement. Initially, the Rent Controller, after holding enquiry, where both sides lead evidence and on behalf of respondent herein, he himself was examined as P.W.1 and marked documents in Ex.A.1 to A.3 and the revision petitioner examined himself as R.W.1 and no documents were marked on his behalf, the Rent Controller accepting both the grounds, ordered for eviction. Against the said order, the revision petitioner preferred an appeal and the Lower Appellate Court, once again re-appreciated the entire evidence including the additional evidence in Ex.B.1 and B.2 filed by the revision petitioner, did not find favour and confirmed the findings of the Rent Controller. Hence, the present revision. Having heard the learned counsel on either side and on perusal of the material available on record, the entire gamut of arguments is on self same lines as projected in both the Courts below. Since, both the Courts below, concurrently found favour with the landlord on both the grounds as to wilful default and personal requirement of the landlord, it is not open for this Court in exercise of powers of revision under section 22 of A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1960 to make a re-exercise or re- appreciation of the evidence to come to a different conclusion. There are no merits in the revision and accordingly the same is hereby dismissed. At this stage, it is represented by learned counsel for respondent that the revision petitioner/tenant has abandoned the premises in question and is not available therein. Be that as it may, one month time from today is granted to the petitioner to vacate and hand over vacant possession to the respondent. Subject to above, the revision stands dismissed. No costs. _________________ B PRAKASH RAO,J DATE: 12.8.2010 TVK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 4256 OF 2008 Date: 12.8.2010