THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.19150 of 2007 ORDER: The petitioner challenges the construction permission, dated 31.05.2001, accorded by respondents 1 and 2, in favour of respondents 3 and 4, enabling them to make construction over certain premises. The petitioner states that the permission so far accorded is contrary to various orders passed by the Madras High Court and that a serious title dispute is pending, in relation to the property. Heard Sri Ch.Samson Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner, Smt.Padmavathi, learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2, Sri R.Narasimha Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.3 and Sri Venkata Ramana, learned counsel for respondent No.4. The petitioner challenges the permission granted to respondents 3 and 4, mainly on the ground that serious title disputes are pending adjudication, in respect of the property on which the construction is proposed. Reference is made to quite large number of proceedings, pending in various Courts, including those in the Madras High Court. It is not in dispute that in O.S.A.No.69 of 1999, the Madras High Court has passed an order of temporary injunction restraining construction over the land in question through order, dated 25.07.2000. Obviously respondents 1 and 2 were not aware of that order, when they accorded permission. As long as the order of injunction subsists, respondents 3 and 4 cannot make construction. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of, setting aside the permission, dated 31.05.2001, and leaving it open to the parties to take further steps depending upon the orders that may be passed by the Madras High Court in O.S.A.No.69 of 1999. There shall be no order as costs. _____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.03.02.2011. GJ