1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 11th day of February, 2011 First Bail Application No. 95 of 2011 Criminal Side Sukhbir @ Kala S/o Phool Singh R/o Village Jhanjhedi P.S.Kotwali, Manglaur Tehsil Roorkee Dist Haridwar …….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ..…..Opposite Party Arising out of Case Crime No. 154 of 2010 Under Sections: 302, 201, 364, 120B I.P.C. Police Station: Jhabreda District: Haridwar Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Mohd Umar, Advocate, present for the applicant. Mr. G.S.Sandhu, G.A. with Shri T.C.Aggarwal, A.G.A, present for the State. Applicant–Sukhbir @ Kala, who is in jail in connection with Case Crime No. 154 of 2010, relating to offences punishable under Section 302, 201, 364 and 2 120B I.P.C police station Jhabreda, District Haridwar has sought his release on bail. Heard. Applicant is not named in the First Information Report. It is a case of circumstantial evidence. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is the person with whom marriage of the deceased was settled, but since the girl did not want to marry the applicant , she got married to another boy Indresh, and started living with her. There is no evidence that applicant had any grudge or enmity against the deceased. It is argued that only on suspicion the applicant has been arrested in the case. In the above circumstances, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view, that the applicant deserves bail. Bail Application is allowed. Let the applicant- Sukhbir @ Kala be released on bail on executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Vacation Judge Dt.11.02.2011 N.P 3