IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:- 24.08.2011 C.W.P.No.1132 of 2009 Ram Bahor ....Petitioner(s) vs. Union of India and others ....Respondent(s) C.O.C.P.No.560 of 2011 Ram Bahor ....Petitioner(s) vs. Balwan Singh ....Respondent(s) *** CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH *** Present:- Ms.Sangita Dhanda, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Kuldip Singh, Advocate for Mr.G.S.Hooda, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr.K.K.Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3. *** AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (Oral) Mr.Gupta, Counsel for respondents No.2 and 3 states that in compliance with the order dated 1.2.2011, the petitioner has reported for duty on 16.3.2011 and is being paid the wages which he is entitled to as per the project in which he is working. Counsel for the petitioner although admits that the petitioner has joined back in service but submits that he would be entitled to the minimum of the wages. She further contends that junior to the petitioner C.W.P.No.1132 of 2009 -2- had earlier been paid higher pay than the petitioner. She, however, submits that liberty may be granted to the petitioner to file a detailed representation qua other claims made in the writ petition and the replication filed thereafter, which have not been granted to the petitioner till date. In view of the statement made by the counsel for the parties, the present writ petition as well as the contempt petition are disposed of as having been rendered infructuous to the extent the petitioner had claimed taking back in service on the post from where he was transferred as Helper in the project. Liberty is also granted to the petitioner to make a detailed representation to respondents No.2 and 3, who shall consider the same and pass a speaking order thereon expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from the date of submission of representation. Photocopy of the order be placed on the Contempt file. August 24, 2011 ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) poonam JUDGE