IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.PADMANABHAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 29TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 10TH PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 26338 of 2007(I) --------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: ------------------ 1. WILSON, S/O VIJAYAN, AGED 44, PUTHENPURACKAL, PRAYAR THEKKUMMURI, KLAPANA VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY. 2. PURUSHOTHAMAN, S/O KOCHUKRISHNAN, AGED 60, CHALITHARAYIL, PRAYAR THEKKUMMURI, KLAPANA VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY. 3. M.H.ASHRAF, S/O HASSAN KUNJU, AGED 40, AZHEEKAL THURUTHUMMURIYIL, ALAPPAD VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY. 4. OMANA, W/O LATE MAHASENAN, PUTHEN VEEDU, HOUSE NO.AP II 249(TSUNAMI HOUSE), ALAPPAD VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY. 5. KUNJUMOL, W/O JALAUDHEEN KUNJU, AGED 43, AZHEEKAL THURUTHUMMURIYIL, ALAPPAD VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY. 6. VIJAYAMMA, D/O KOMALATHU CHELLAMMA, AGED 43, AZHEEKAL THURUTHUMMURIYIL, ALAPPAD VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY. BY ADV. SMT.R.RANJINI RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND THE CHAIRMAN, DLPC, KOLLAM. 2. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, L.A.NO.1, SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, KOLLAM. 3. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA STATE P.W.D. ROADS DIVISION, KERALA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, KOLLAM. BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI BASANT BALAJI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. PADMANABHAN NAIR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P(C) NO.26338 OF 2007 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 29th day of February, 2008 J U D G M E N T -------------------- Petitioner is aggrieved Exhibits P3 and P4. 2. First respondent has filed a counter affidavit. In paragraph 4 of the counter affidavit it is stated that subsequent to Exhibit P4 another meeting was convened by the District Collector, Kollam, which was attended to by the Additional Secretary to Government, Disaster Management Department and the major concerns of all the petitioners were heard. It is also stated therein that Government have passed another order on 26.10.2007 redressing the grievance of the petitioners. In view of the statement in the counter affidavit, no further orders are necessary in this case. Writ Petition is disposed of recording the statement contained in the counter affidavit. K. PADMANABHAN NAIR, JUDGE. vsv K. PADMANABHAN NAIR, J. ===================== M.F.A. ===================== J U D G M E N T ------------------------------------------- TH FEBRUARY, 2008