IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Crl. Writ Petition No. 72 of 2008 Rispal and five others …………… Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …………….. Respondents Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Mr. M.A. Khan, learned Brief Holder for the State makes a statement that after completion of investigation, charge sheet has been filed against all the six petitioners, namely Rispal, Bhupendera Singh, Satnam Singh, Balwindera Singh, Joga Singh and Jagdev Singh. A short counter affidavit has also been filed by the Investigating Officer to this effect. In view of above, development, this writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous with the observation that the interim order dated 29.01.2008, passed by this Court, shall automatically stand vacated on the date the charge sheet is filed before the court concerned. (Dharam Veer, J.) (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 21.05.2008 21.05.2008 H. Negi