IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19111 of 2010 NITYA NAND YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 6.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Rs. 24,000/- each was allotted to informant’s wife and mother under the scheme of Indira Awas. Rs. 12,000/- each drawn also from the bank then it is said that Rs. 12,000/- from the amount was demanded from the informant. The informant was abused in name of his caste Chamar. Abuse in name of caste is not corroborated by his mother and wife. No construction work was found started. Benefit under the Indira Awas Yojna was not allotted to the informant rather to his wife and mother, goes to show some foul game played by him which is strengthened by no construction work. The allegation appears an explanation for the game played by him, rightly final form was submitted though cognizance is taken which never can be taken for refusal of anticipatory bail. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above 2 named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in Sangrampur (Tetiya Bumber) P.S. Case No. 88 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)