CRM No. M 28623 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 28623 of 2010 Date of decision: 11.11.2010 Vijay ........ Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner Ms Priyanka Dalal, AAG, Haryana for the respondent - State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.125 dated 30.03.2010 under Sections 302, 34 of Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Sampla, District Rohtak. It is contended that while giving information to the Doctor, the complainant who is the real brother of the deceased made a statement that it was a case of accident. Thereafter, while recording the FIR, he changed his statement and stated that some unknown persons have killed his brother- Kuldeep. During investigation, he made another statement and stated that CRM No. M 28623 of 2010 2 he had actually seen the petitioner causing injuries. The complainant has been consistently changing his stand making the prosecution story almost doubtful. It is also stated that the co-accused of the petitioner has already been enlarged on bail by the Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtak, vide order dated 01.09.2010 (Annexure P-4). Bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtak. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge November 11, 2010 mohan