IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.BALACHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 1ST SEPTEMBER 2008 / 10TH BHADRA 1930 RSA.No. 391 of 2008 ----------------------- AS.155/2003 of PRL.SUB COURT,IRINJALAKUDA OS.1662/2002 of ADDL.M.C.,IRINJALAKUDA .................... APPELLANT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT ----------------------------------------- NANDAKUMAR, AGED 48, S/O.SANKUNNY, PALAKKAL HOUSE, NEAR PATHANAPURAM TEMPLE, THANISSERY DESOM, MANAVALASSERY VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.K.RAVI (PARIYARATH) RESPONDENT: RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF --------------------------------------------- LOUIS, S/O.POULOSE, MALIEKKAL HOUSE, IRINJALAKUDA DESOM, MANAVALASSERY VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.T.N.MANOJ THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.P. BALACHANDRAN, J. --------------------------------------------------- R.S.A. No 391 of 2008 --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st September 2008 JUDGMENT Counsel for the appellant submits that the Second Appeal is against the concurrent judgment in a suit for recovery of money, that he does not canvass for the contention that there is any merit in this appeal and that what the appellant wants is only four months' time to discharge the entire debt. Granting of time as prayed for is not opposed by counsel for the respondent in the event of the appeal being dismissed as desired by counsel for the appellant. In the result, I dismiss this R.S.A in limine, but all the same appellant is granted four months' time to discharge the entire debt. Sd/- K.P. BALACHANDRAN Judge 01/09/2008 en [true copy]