1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR FIRST APPEAL NO.444/2011 ASHOK NAMDEORAO TAYADE & ANOTHER ..VS.. VISHANT MANOHAR INGALE & OTHERS Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri D.N. Kukday, advocate for appellant. Shri K.R. Lule, advocate for respondent no.1 CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 28.09.2011. CIVIL APPLICATION CAF NO.1640/2011 Heard. Perused the judgment impugned. Looking to the nature of the injury namely amputation of knee and leg and the fact that the claimant has been working in Cooperative Bank, in my opinion, the following order would sub serve the ends of justice, with a further direction that the claimant shall not be allowed to withdraw the amount hereinafter, since the major amount is being allowed to be withdrawn: The civil application is partly allowed. The respondent no.1 is permitted to withdraw 50% of the amount deposited by the appellant, subject to furnishing surety to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial). It is made clear 2 that the respondent shall not be allowed to seek withdrawal of amount hereinafter. The balance amount may be invested in the nationalised bank, as per standing orders. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that pursuant to the order dated 29.7.2010, this court had asked the appellant to deposit 10,000/- towards litigation expenses and he has accordingly deposited. Learned counsel for the respondent has applied for withdrawal of the same by filing the civil application. In view of the fact that the respondent/ claimant has already been permitted to withdraw major amount i.e. 50% of the amount deposited by the appellant, in the is court, the same does include the litigation expenses. Hence the amount of Rs.10,000/- be returned to the appellant/ company. The civil application stands disposed of. JUDGE SMP