t^ HIGH GOURTOFGHHATTiSQARHATBILASPUR DIVISIONBENCH CORAM: HQN'BLE SHR8 RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. & HON'BLE SHRI RLJHANWAR, J. Mlsc ApbeaKClNo. 1616 bf 2009 ADpeilants ¥"; Respondents 1 Smt Bharti, Wd/o Surendra Kumar Bhooar^a, aged about 37 years 2 Katya Bhushan, S/o Late Surendra Kumar Bhooarya, aged about 13 years 3 Nanek Prasad Bhooarya, S/o Late Bai'iram, aged about 80 years 4 Smt Suraj, V^/o Nanek Prasad, aged about 72 years (Respondentj No.2 is minor, represenfed tiytheQuardian at iitem MotherSmtBharti(AppeSlant No.1) (whereas in the award the appellant No.1 has been shown as natural guarcllan of appellant No.2 and 3 by mistake) (AII r/0 Village Arjunda, Tahsil Guderdehi, Distt Durg (Chhattisgarh) Versus 1 Santlal Nishad, S/oShivlaf Nishad, R/o Bhagoli Para, DaKirajhara, Distt Durg(CG) Driver 2 Amarjeet Singh, Bedi. S/o late AS Bedi, R/o Main Road, DafHrajhara, Distt Durg Owner 3 DMsional Manager, Reiiance Generaj . {nsurance Co.Ltd., ^aistambh Chowk, GE Road, Raipur c^ .^^ subbu Miscelianeous Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehides Act 1988 Present : Shri SRJJaiswai, counseifortheappeilants. ORDER (16th February, 2010) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri SRJ Jaiswal, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the appeal filed bythe appellants/ciaimants for enhancement of the compensatjon awarded by the Tribunal, with the liberty of filing cross-objectionsj for enhancement of the compensation in theappeaJ oftheinsurer/ owner of the vehide. 2) Permission granted. 3) W'rth the above iiberty, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Chief Justice