IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 6358 of 2006 DATE OF ORDER:29.4.2009 State of Haryana and another ....Petitioners Versus Sumitra and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Navneet Singh, A.A.G. Haryana for the petitioners. Mr. R.A. Sheoran, Advocate for respondent No.1. RAJESH BINDAL J. The challenge in the present petition is to the judgment passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Bhiwani whereby the application filed by the petitioner for condonation of delay of 12 days in filing of appeal against the judgment and decree of the trial court was dismissed. While dismissing the application for condonation of delay, the appeal was also dismissed and the learned courts below further directed for preparation of decree sheet. Against the judgment of the lower appellate court the petitioner filed revision petition before this Court. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 at the very out set raised preliminary objection and submitted that against the judgment and decree of the lower appellate court, the Regular Second Appeal is maintainable before this Court and not Civil Revision. In view of this factual position, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail alternative remedy in accordance with law. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 29.4.2008 ( RAJESH BINDAL ) rajeev JUDGE