CLCON No.198 of 2001 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. List has been revised. No one is present for the applicants. Mr. Subhash Upadhayay, the learned counsel for the respondents is present. The court has perused the contempt application and finds that the applicants are basically aggrieved by their non- appointment as Teachers in the hill areas inspite of having the eligibility. It is alleged that various interim orders were issued, which were not complied with by the opposite party nor their representation have been decided. Para 17 of the counter affidavit reveals that the representation of the applicants was rejected by a speaking order. The counter affidavit further indicates that the applicants were appointed as part-time volunteers and were not eligible for appointment as teacher. In the light of the aforesaid, the court does not find any willful disobedience on the part of the opposite parties. Notices are discharged and the contempt application is dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 22.11.2011 LSR