IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17851 of 2009 1. AJAY KUMAR SINGH S/O RAM PRAVESH SINGH R/O VILL.- SONBARSA, P.O.- WAR, P.S.- MADANPUR, DISTT.- AURANGABAD Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AURANGABAD, DISTT.- AURANGABAD 4. THE DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER AURANGABAD, DISTT.- AURANGABAD 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER MADANPUR BLOCK, DISTT.- AURANGABAD 6. THE MUKHIYA GRAM PANCHAYAT NIMA ANJAN, BLOCK- MADANPUR, DISTT.- AURANGABAD 7. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY GRAM PANCHAYAT NIMA ANJAN, BLOCK- MADANPUR, DISTT.- AURANGABAD ----------- 2 19.4.2010 Petitioner’s prayer is for quashing of the order contained in memo. 1141 dated 3.10.2007 passed by the Block Development Officer, Madanpur, cancelling appointment of petitioner. The ground, which has been taken for assailing the impugned order is that without issuing any notice to the petitioner, the order terminating his service, has been passed. The order was passed in the year 2007 and what developments have taken thereafter, has not been mentioned in the writ application. In the given circumstance, petitioner is allowed to withdraw this writ application giving him liberty to file an appeal before the District Teachers Employment Appellate - 2 - Tribunal, Aurangabad. In case the post on which the petitioner was appointed, has not been included in the second phase of appointment, the Appellate Tribunal will consider his case in accordance with law and pass orders within the statutory period. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.Kumar