IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHALITISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition (227) No. 4751 of 2008 Ram Lal Sahare, S/o Budgu Ram Saharc’, aged about 42 years, VR/o Village — Bamnidih, Tahsil 8:. Poh'ce Station — Bamnjdjh, District — Janjgir—Champa (C.G.) Petitioncr Applicant Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhatu'sgarh, Through Secretaxy, Panchayat, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director, Panchayat, Raipur, District — Raipur(C.G.) Collector, Janjgil‘, Disin‘ct - Champa {c.G.) ‘4. Chief Executive 0f&cer, Janpad Panhayat - Bamnidih, Dishict Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Guiabuddin, S/o Guiam Khan, Saxpanch, Glam Panchayat Bamm'dih, District — Janjgr—Champa (C.G.) Janjgir‘ OI Non- applicant WRIT PEI‘I'HON UNDER Agnew 227 OF THE CONSTITunoFbp INDIK (SB: Hon’ble Shri Saiish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri Awadh Tripathi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Vinay Han't, Deputy Advocate Geneml for the respondents No. 1 to 4. Shri Avinash Mishxa, Advocate for the respondent No.5. O R D E R (Passed on this 29th Day ofAugust, 2008) With the consent of learned counsel appealing for the arties, p the matter is heard finally. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made a revision against the order dated 17.4.2008, passed by the Additional Collector, Janjgir Champa in Case No. 5-A/89(15)/2007-08. He further submits that the main contesting respondent No.5 appeared as caveator on the hrst date of hearing. The application’ior interim relief was A rejected and the matter is not being disposed of. / / Shri Avinash Mhhra, leanled counsel appean'ng "for the mspondent No.5 submits that if a dimcu'on is made to the Director, Panchayat to hear the matter expaditiously, the interest ofjustice would be sub-served. Shn' Vinay Harit, learned Deputy Advocate Geneml appean’ng for the respondents No. 1 to 4 also have no objection to the above submission. In View of the fomgoing, havingregaxd to the facts situau'on of the case, it is desirable that the Director, Panchayat, Raipur may consider the revision of the petitioner expediu'ously, in accordance with law, on its own merits, as early as possible, preferably within a pen’od of six weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the above direction, this petition stands disposed of. No \ order asto costs. Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakut