1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.252 OF 2007 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders Mr.S.S.Halkunde, learned counsel for applicant. Mr.P.P.More, learned APP for State CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J. DATE : 23/06/2010 Respondent no.1 absent even though duly served. This criminal revision application arises against the order passed by the Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge Latur in Criminal Appeal No.30/2006. This appeal was preferred by the original accused against the order of conviction passed in STC No. 1004/2005. By way of order dated 11/07/2006, the 2nd J.M.F.C. Latur has convicted the accused, respondent no.2 in this revision for the offence punishable u/s. 138 of The N.I.Act, which order of conviction was set aside in the criminal appeal, which is impugned in this revision. It is informed across the bar that the revision applicant is 2 expired during the pendancy of this revision application, and his legal heirs are not traceable. In view of this, this revision application stands abated and disposed of accordingly. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/JUNE 2010/cri-rev-252-07