MC 862/2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Choudhury, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Mr. Phukan, le arned counsel appearing for the opposite parties/appellants in MAC Appeal No. 74 /2008. The applicant who is the mother of deceased Prafulla Sharma, by the present application though has prayed for her impleadment, in para 9 of the application she has prayed for a direction for allowing her to withdraw 50% of t he money deposited before the learned Tribunal in terms of the award dated 21.7. 2008 passed in MAC case No. 80/2004, which is also reflected in the cause title. In fact the prayer for impleadment was made in Misc. Case No. 863/2009. Mr. Chouhdury, learned counsel submits that because of the inadv ertent mistake in the prayer instead of praying for a direction to allow her to withdraw 50% of the money deposited as has been mentioned in the cause title of the application, the prayer for impleadment has been made as sought for in MC No . 863/2009. The learned counsel, therefore, submits that by this application the applicant in fact prays for a direction to release the aforesaid amount, as suc h necessary direction may be issued. Mr. Phukan, learned counsel for the appellant, the widow of the deceased, has submitted that whether the present applicant would be entitled to any amount is to be decided at the time of hearing of the main appeal. It appears that there is no dispute that the present applicant i s the mother of the deceased. The applicant is stated to be more than 70 years o ld. Having regard to the aforesaid position, am amount of Rs. 1,50,0 00/- is directed to be released in favour of the applicant by an account payee c heque on being identified. The remaining amount, however, may be kept in fixed deposit by t he learned Member, MACT, Sivasagar. Misc. case stands disposed of.