IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41615 of 2009 RANDHIR KUMAR SON OF BISHUNDEO PRASAD @ SUDHIN PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 2.12.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is not named in the first information report and thereafter a seizure list was prepared showing that the recovery was made from the front of the betel nut shop of one Sanjay Kumar but the name of the petitioner was also inserted in the column where the article was seized and apart from the present case even though he was earlier an accused in a case u/s.392 I.P.C., he was acquitted in the same, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 5.5.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya in Sherghati P.S.case No.113 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and (ii) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )