IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 1ST JULY 2011 / 10TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 17809 of 2011(A) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ THE MANAGER, ALP SCHOOL POLUR, KONOTT P.O., KUNNAMANGALAM, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.K.MURALEEDHARAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, TRIVANDRUM. 695 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KUNNAMANGALAM. 673 015. 3. SMT.K.SANALKUMARI, HEADMISTRESS (UNDER SUSPENSION), PAKALEDATH HOUSE, P.O.PARAMBIL, VIA MARIKUNNU, KOZHIKODE-673 012. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.V.VIJULAL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss W.P.(C) NO.17809/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE MANAGER ALP SCHOOL POLUR KUNNAMANGALAM DTD. 16.6.2011. P2:- COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER ENCLOSING THE COMPLAINTS OF THE TEACHERS AND PARENTS DTD. 16.6.2011. P3:- COPY OF THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER AUTHORIZING HER SON TO REPRESENT IN THE DEPARTMENTAL HEARING. P4:- COPY OF THE ORDER NO.D/2000/2011 DTD. 21.6.2011. P5:- COPY OF THE REVISION DTD. 28.6.2011 FILED BY THE PETITIONER. P5(a):- COPY OF THE STAY PETITIN DTD. 28.6.2011 FILED BY THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL:- TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.17809/2011-A ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 1st day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T The writ petition is filed by a Manager of a school seeking for a direction to consider the revision petition filed as Ext.P5 within a time frame and also to pass orders on the stay petition filed along with it at the earliest. This is a matter concerning the suspension of the third respondent. The Assistant Educational Officer has rejected the application for continued suspension. It is in these circumstances, the petitioner has filed revision petition before the Government. 2. One of the main grounds stated in the writ petition is that the petitioner-Manager was not heard before the order was passed. 3. The petitioner has already availed the statutory remedy by filing a revision petition. The said revision petition will be disposed of after hearing the parties within six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. In the meanwhile W.P.(C). No.17809/2011 -:2:- stay petition filed along with Ext.P5, produced herein as Ext.P5(a) will be disposed of by the Government after hearing the parties within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms