IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4307 of 2006 JAGDISH PRASAD Versus THE CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR AND OTHERS. ----------- 2. 18.5.2010. Heard Mr. M.P.Dixit, learned counsel for the petitioner. There is no representation on behalf of the respondent Bihar State Road Transport Corporation and its functionaries. The father of the petitioner died in harness on 6.12.1984. It is stated that even the mother of the petitioner predeceased his father. The deceased employee was survived by three sons, namely, Jagdish Prasad (the present petitioner), Sakaldeep Prasad and Om Prakash. The petitioner is the eldest son of the deceased employee who makes a complaint regarding the non payment of the provident fund amount and group insurance amount to which the deceased employee was entitled together with the admissible interest thereon. The matter regarding the payment of the dues of the employees of the respondent Corporation is pending before the Supreme Court and directions have been issued to the Corporation for making payment(s) thereof. As 2 the payment of the in-service benefit and post retiral benefits of the Corporation’s employees is subject matter of a proceedings before the Supreme Court and is being regularly monitored, there can not be a parallel proceedings for the self same cause of action and the writ petition is disposed of in the light of the directions passed by the Supreme Court on this issue. The respondents are under obligation to make the payments of the admissible dues of the petitioner strictly in terms of the directions issued by the Supreme Court in the pending proceedings. The writ petition stands disposed of. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)