IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 12311 of 2004 Between: 1 A.Venkataiah, s/o Chandraiah, working CSI High School, Alair, Nalgonda District. 2 M.Mruthyunjaya Raj, s/o Simon, working CSI High School, Alair, Nalgonda District. 3 N.Ephraim, s/o Williams, working CSI High School, Alair, Nalgonda District. 4 Smt.D.Gijy Joyce, working CSI High School, Alair, Nalgonda District. 5 D.Venkat Narsimha Reddy, s/o Sammi Reddy, working CSI High School, Alair, Nalgonda District. 6 M.Vidyasagar Reddy, s/o Narsimha Reddy, working CSI High School, Alair, Nalgonda District. 7 M.Balraj, s/o Malkaiah, working CSI High School, Alair, Nalgonda District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh rep., by its Secretary, Department of Education, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 District Educational Officer, Nalgonda. 3 CSI (Church of South India) High School Alair, Nalgonda District rep., by its Correspondent K.J.Thomas .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction or writ specially writ of mandamus directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioners in pursuance of respective appointment orders No.10/2003-2004 dt.13-8- 2003 of 3rd respondent and pay arrears of salaries payable to the said aided posts along with attendant benefits to the petitioners by declaring the action of respondents in not regularizing the appointments of petitioners as made by the selection committee as arbitrary, illegal, void, without jurisdiction and violative of Art.14, 16, 21 of Constitution of India. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.L.PRABHAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 12311 of 2004 ORDER: The learned counsel for the writ petitioners submitted that the subject matter in the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _____________________ Justice G. Chandraiah Date:19-06-2008 mrb