HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.24952 of 2011 Date:06.09.2011 Between: Sampathirao Ramu ..... Petitioner AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Reptd by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration, Hyderabad and two others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Sri N.Vidhya Prasad For Sri N.Ravi Prasad Counsel for Respondent No.1: AGP for Municipal Administration Counsel for Respondent No.2: Smt V.Preethi Reddy, Standing Counsel for VUDA Counsel for Respondent No.3: Sri N.Ranga Reddy Standing Counsel for GVMC The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent Nos.2 and 3 and their sub- ordinates in interfering with the petitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of Ac.0.47 cents of land equivalent to 2,274.80 square yards in Sy.No.59/2 of Vadlapudi Village, Visakhapatnam, without issuing any notice to the petitioner and without passing any order as illegal and arbitrary. At the hearing, Sri N.Vidhya Prasad, learned counsel representing Sri N.Ravi Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the case for some time sought for permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to his client to first approach respondent No.2 for granting permission for raising compound wall, and avail his legal remedy thereafter, in the event respondent No.2 seeks to interfere with his right to raise the compound wall. Request of the learned counsel for the petitioner is accepted and the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, W.P.M.P.No.30679 of 2011 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. __________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 06th September, 2011 DR