IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45217 of 2010 1. UDAY KANT ROY S/O LATE WAKIL ROY. 2. RAJIVA ROSHAN ROY @ RAJEEVA ROY @ SANDJEEV ROY S/O UDAY KAND ROY. 3. AMITABH BACCHAN ROY @ ANIL ROY S/O UDAYKANT ROY. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 05.05.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the application of petitioner No.1. Such permission is granted. Accordingly, the application of petitioner no.1 is dismissed as withdrawn. For petitioner Nos. 2 and 3, heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. There is case and counter case for the occurrence of the same day. Theft is said ornamental and abuse in name of informant’s caste is inside the house not in public view. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of their arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Sahkund (Sajour) P.S. Case No. 155 of 2010, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Ibrar/- ( Mandhata Singh, J.)