M HIGH CGURT OF CHHA’I"I‘ISGARH AT BILAS?UR M WRIT PETITION (S) No. 3376 01‘29G7 RIT PETXTION UNDER ARTIQLE 226 OF THE CON'S’I'ITU'I‘ION OF INDIA. Shlgie Eench ' H0117“ ie Justice Siui Satish K. Agy§10t11 Presem: blm Ami Mourva, Advocate Ior me penuoners S‘m Y S T334 n Govt Ad Jocaie f0: the ShJeAospond 3w. ORDER (Passed on 20m day ofJune, 200?) The question of law involved herein is asto whether the petitioner is , ehtitled to regular pay scale wefthe date of initial appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same as to that of in W.P.(S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh & Others), which was allowed Vide order dated 7. 1 1.2006. 3. In View ofthe above~stated submissions made by learned counsel for the panties: the Writ petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge W PETITKONER Net Ram Raoutxa Aged about 47 Years elm Jethuram Raoutia Assistant Govt Middle School SaraQkeEa Block wi'aikharoda Dxs‘t JamgE-Champa C G.) VERbUb RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhamsgarh Through Secretarv School Eduyatmn Department D K S Bnawan, Ralpur (tG) 2. Thv Dlrector Pubhg InsLructimi Depai‘tment Ramur (CG) 3. Dmnm Euuuation Officer Janjgir Distm'ct Jamgir-Lhamna (C G) 4‘. 106k Educmcm Offiyer Mal ‘mmda Janjglr-Champa (CG)