1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No.3127/2009 ( Bhushan Tupsaundarya +2 ..V/s.. State of Maharasthra +1) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. C.A. Joshi, Advocate for applicants. Mr. D.M. Kale, A.P.P. for State. CORAM:- R. Y. GANOO, J. DATED:- 15 th SEPTEMBER, 2009. Heard Mr. Joshi, learned advocate for the applicants. This is a petition for quashing of F.I.R.No.250/2009, filed with Civil Lines Police Station, Akola by one Smt. Bharti Janjal. I have perused the text of the F.I.R. which is a only document filed along with this petition. A perusal of the F.I.R. goes to show that it is came to be lodged on 7th of April 2009. While registering the crime police have registered an offence under section 307 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned Advocate Mr. Joshi wanted this Court to quash this F.I.R. on the ground that the text of the F.I.R. does not disclose an offence punishable under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. 2 After having gone through the F.I.R., I am inclined to observe that it would be too early to say that the offence under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code is not disclosed. Undoubtedly, after entire chargesheet is filed, it will be open for the petitioners to attend the said chargesheet in accordance with the provisions of law. As on today no interference in the matter is called for. Hence the F.I.R. No.250/2009, for an offence under section 307 R/w. Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code cannot be quashed. In view of the above, petition stands dismissed at the stage of admission. JUDGE Tambaskar.