wwg, Rww x o? J 527/\ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Cr ) NaQ‘Dfb 2/ 0f 20 1 1 PETITIONER: / Arun Trivedi S/o Shri AB. ‘ ‘ Trivedi, aged about 32 y6ars, occupation— medical shop, resident of Kargi Road, Tahsil Kota, District Bilaspur (CG). Versus RESPONDENTS: /1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Home Department, Mantralay at 'D.K.s. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). &. The Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development Department, Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). ( 3. The Director General of Police, Police Headquarter, Raipur, District Raipur (CG). The Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (CG). 5. The Superintendent of Police, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (CG). / 6. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Kota, District Bilaspur (CG). /7. The Station House Officer, ' Police Station Kota, District Bilaspur (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: As stated‘in the cause title above. )\/‘ x, w »\. , \px HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH i BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Cr.) NO.2282 OF 2011 PETITIONER Arun Trivedi Versus RESPONDENTS The State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Atticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :— Shri M K Bhaduri Advocate forthe petitioner i (2008)72 SCC 409 #v it Shri VV S Murthy, Dy Adv General for the State ORDER (Passed on this 29m day of September, 201 1) T\ 1 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel appearing (for the petitioner submits that the Police Authorities have decided to close the investigation. According to the petitioner, the investigation has not been done properly. 3. Thus, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to the provisions, as enshrined under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by approaching to the competent Court for fresh investigation or re-investigation in the matter, in view of the decision of the Supreme Court rendered in Sakiri Vasu v. state or up. & othersi. 4. No objection from other side. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as wrthdrawn wrth the aforesaid liberty, if so advised. T Satlsh k Aonmotn \ Judge Gowri