IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14580 of 2010 1. BHIKHAR MAHTO 2. CHATHIYA DEVI ------------------------------ PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 7.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioners are father-in-law and mother-in-law, alleged for killing the deceased along with their other family members for demand of dowry in matrimonial house within seven years of marriage. For presumption under section 113B of Evidence Act torture for demand is lacking. For the circumstance, if exists, submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that matter was informed to parental family members while she (deceased) was suffering from some ailment. Further paragraph 49 of the case diary is referred which is statement of a doctor who provided some medical aid to the deceased and referred her for better treatment. Admittedly there is no eye witness. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on 2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate (West), Muzaffarpur in Baruraj P.S. Case No. 35/07, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)