®@ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION N053“ ( 2005 TI'I‘IQNER AT BILASPUR : r Tikaram Dansena S/o. Sukhram @ Sukhru Ram Dansena , Aged about-43 years, Driver, I.C.D.S. Kharsia, District— Raigarh (C.G.), R/o. Village- Sodhka, Tahsil- Kharsia, District- Raigarh (C.G.). :VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretaly, Woman and Child Development Department, D. K. S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). The Additional Collector, Raigarh, District— Raigarh (C.G.). District Woman and Child Development Department, District- Raigarh (C.GI). The Project Officer, I.C.D.S. Kharsia, District- Raigarh (C,G.). The Labour Offlcer, District Ofiice Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226(227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. W m4 PE ‘ «a HIGH COURT OF CHHliL’ITISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 5381 0f2005 \ Tikaram Dansena. VERSUS PETITIONER RESPONDENTS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE C INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. AglL”hotri. J. Present: Shri P.K.Patel, Advpcate for the petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. QNSTrrUTION OF ORAL ORDER (Passed on 22“a day of February, 2010) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission ofthis Coult to withdraw this petition. Learned counsel appearing for other side has no obj action. 3. It is ordered aceordingly. 4. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as Withdrawn. ,‘f‘sw g ' Satish K. Agnihotri; Judge