IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 13422 of 2000 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- MANDVI TALUKA SAHAKARI Versus AUTHORISED OFFICER ELECTION -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR JAYANT PATEL for Petitioner Ms NANDINI JOSHI, agp for Respondent No. 1, 2 DS AFF.NOT FILED (R) for Respondent No. 3, 4, 5 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH Date of decision: 21/06/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has challenged the inclusion of the names of respondent Nos. 3 and 4 in the voters list for the elections to the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Mandvi. 2. Notice was issued by this Court on 27.12.2000 and the Rule was issued on 11.1.2001. However, no ad-interim or interim relief was granted by this Court earlier. By the time this petition has come up for hearing, the elections to the APMC have already been held and the results are also declared. 3. In view of the above developments, as stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner, no useful purpose will be served by entertaining this petition at this stage. The petition is accordingly disposed of as infructuous. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. (M.S. Shah, J.) sundar/-