w y!QW30URT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Pefflion No. 978 of 2002 Petitioner Versus Respondents 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Ashok Kumar, S/o Nanak Ram, aged about 42 years, resident of Silyari District Raipur, (CG). The State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary 1-lome Affairs, Mantralay, D. K. S. BuiUing, Raipur, Tahsil and Dsitrict Raipur (CG) The Collector, Raipur, District Raipur (CG). The Superintendent of Police, Raipur, D!strictRatpur(CG). Siation Housa Officer, Poiice StaBon Dharsivan, Dtstrict Raipur (CG). Shri U. R. Netam, Tahsildar, Titda Neora, District Raipur (CG). Khem Chand Son of Megh-raj- Ma!, D-4164 Deo Nagar, Raipur (CG). Deputy Registrar, Shri CSnesh Kumar Kosaiay, Raipur, OfRce of Deputy Registrar, Raipur (CG). Dilip Kumar 5/o Danamat Nihichalani, P.0. Silyari, Raipur, District Raipur. /tehok Kumar S/o Khubchand Setpal, Post Office Neora, Disfrict Raipur (CG). Prakash Chand S/o Danamai Nihcha'ani, Tilda Camp, P.0. Neora District Raipur. WR!T PETITOiN UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THECQNSTn'UTlON^E INDIA Single Bench : Hon'bts Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Nons appears for fte petitioner. Shri S. K. Mishra, Panel Lawyer for tte respondente No.1 to 4. Shri P. R. Patankar, Advocatsfor the respondent No.6. Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate for the respondents No. 5,8, 8 and 10. s '\ 's ja' o TTiakur ORALORDER (Passed on this 11"' day of December, 2007) The matter is called for hearing twce. On botti the occasions, none appears nor any representation is made on behaff of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. In view of the above, the writ petition stands dismissed for \vant of prosecution. Satish K. AgiiiSiotri Judge