1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPEAL NO.21 OF 2006 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.79 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2683 OF 2003 Shri Rajnarayan S. Pathak .. Appellant V/s. The Dy.Director of Education, Greater Mumbai & ors. .. Respondents Mr.S.J. Panicker for the appellant. Mr.Vishal Phal, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM : R.M. LODHA & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ DATED : 19TH JANUARY, 2006 P.C. Heard. 2. By the impugned order, the learned Single Judge has refused to take cognizance of the contempt on the ground that the order dated 4.2.2004 has been substantially complied with. Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 provides for an appeal from order or decision punishing the contemnor for contempt. In the present case, no case has been found against the contemnor. 3. Appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. (R.M. LODHA, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)