IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26403 of 2010 MUSAI MALLIK Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 8.9.2010. Heard. The court has expressed his opinion in Annexure-1 while dismissing the prayer for bail of the petitioner for the first time. Since thereafter the petitioner has made the renewal prayer, whereupon a report was called for from the learned 7th Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur. The same appears at flag-A. The learned trial Judge has reported as under: “Likely time to be consumed in the conclusion of trial would be six months. However I shall try my best to conclude the trial even before expiry of six months.” The Court trusts the words of the learned trial Judge and the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also pins his hope on that. The learned trial Judge shall rise up to the occasion and live up to his words in concluding the trial within the time frame set down by himself or may be earlier to that. Under the above expectation, this petition is dismissed. However, if the learned trial Judge, i.e., 7th Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur fails in keeping his words then he shall himself release the petitioner on bail on execution of a bond to his own satisfaction in connection with S.Tr.No.957 of 2009 arising out of Mushahari P.S.Case No.40 of 2009. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)