IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.443 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.3303 OF 1992 Rameshchandra K. Raote ..... Plaintiff V/s. Dattaram A Raote & ors. .... Defendants And M/s.Abhay Gems .... Respondent Ms.P.L.Bachani, for the plaintiff Mr.Y.R.Shah, for the applicant. Mr.J.M.Chondankar, for defendant No.5. CORAM: R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED: 19th JANUARY, 2009. P.C. 1. This chamber summons is taken out by the respondent for getting final royalty fixed as the respondent was called upon to pay adhoc-royalty. It is required to be mentioned that a request for respondent to reopen the lock and put the respondent as agent of the Court Receiver made to the Court through Chamber Summons No.90 of 2008 has been declined by dismissing the said chamber summons. Hence, the respondent now cannot go back into the suit premises on the basis of the earlier orders passed. It is noted that adhoc ad-interim order was fixed. However, now the respondent is not going back in the premises. There is no need to fix full fledged royalty as is normally done. Hence, the chamber summons is required to be dismissed. For the reasons aforesaid, the chamber summons is dismissed with no order as to costs. ( R.Y.GANOO, J. )