IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 4173 of 2008. Decided on: 20.09.2010. __________________________________________________________ Amar Singh. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : None. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): In sequel to order dated 21st July, 2010, the petitioner has been served. Neither the petitioner is present in person nor is he represented by any counsel. Consequently, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution, so also the pending application(s), if any. However, the same can be restored as and when application for the purpose is moved. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. September 20, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?