-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.52 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.606 OF 2005 Ramesh V. Kharat & M/s.Prerna Housing & Developers ... Petitioner (Org. Petitioner) V/s. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & ors. ... Respondents (Org. Respondents) Mr.P.K. Dhakephalkar with Mr.S.V.Dhakephalkar i/by Mr.I.G.Buddhadev for petitioner. Mr.N.V.Walawalkar with Ms.Preeti Purandare for res.Nos.1 to 3. Mr.Paresh Shah i/by M/s.Shah and Sanghavi for res.Nos.5, 6 & 8 to 15. ----- CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATED : 24th November 2005 DATED : 24th November 2005 DATED : 24th November 2005 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard Mr.Dhakephalkar in support of this Review Petition, which is filed by a group of developers who want to develop a parcel of land known as Vasanji Park separately under Development Control Regulation 33(7). The plot is owned by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The Municipal Corporation owns another adjoining plot known as Dastoorwadi. The Municipal Corporation earlier decided to develop these two plots separately. However, on re-consideration, it was -2- decided to develop both these plots together and another developer has been appointed for that purpose. Both the plots are owned by the Municipal Corporation. It is for the Municipal Corporation to decide how best the property should be developed. No mala fides were shown on the earlier occasion. Now also nothing has been shown. 2. In the circumstances, there is no reason to recall the order which we have passed. The Review Petition is rejected. (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)