IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 1314 of 2006 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.3.2009 Gulzara Singh ....Petitioner Versus Amoldeep Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. P.S. Baath, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Pal Singh, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. RAJESH BINDAL J The challenge in the present petition is to the order dated August 31, 2005 passed by the learned Court below whereby in proceedings for passing of final decree in a suit for partition the respondent No.1 was permitted to be impleaded as party. A perusal of the impugned order shows that it is the estate of deceased Kartar Singh, the partition of which was being sought by his heirs. After the passing of preliminary decree on November 29, 1998, Kartar Singh died and on December 10, 2003 respondent No.1 projected a registered Will dated June 20, 1994 executed by deceased Kartar Singh in his favour vide which he inherited share of property which was to go to his father Malkiat Singh. It was on the basis of this subsequent development that during the proceedings for passing of final decree, the respondent No.1 was directed to be impleaded as one of the plaintiff in the suit as he had acquired interest in the property owned by Kartar Singh by way of a registered Will dated June 20, 1994 executed by Kartar Singh in his favour. It is pertaining to 1/8th share in the property owned by Kartar Singh regarding which separate possession was being claimed by Malkiat Singh. Once the respondent No.1 had acquired interest in the property on the basis of Will executed in his favour by Kartar Singh whose share on account of inheritance was being claimed by Malkiat Singh father of respondent No.1 Amol Deep Singh, he was certainly a necessary party in the proceedings pending before the Court below. Accordingly, I do not find any reason to interfere in the impugned order and the present revision petition is dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) 27.3.2009 JUDGE Reema