SINGLE BENCH IN THE HIGH CQURT OP CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ petition rC1 No ^ /201 1 ^ PETITIONER_: Tilakbai, D/o Titra Satnami, aged about 48 years, R/o Plot No. 590/1 Vindhyawasmi Ward No. 14 f '^n..l-*;'F» <n^^ [New ward No-20] Kawardha ^J^ "'^ V.- ^^s6 ^- ...^<^^ ^^,^w 1 Distt-Kabirdham. (CG). Versus RESPONDENTS •^. 1- State of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Kawardha District - Kabirdham. (CG) 2- ^ Municipal Council Kawardha through The Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Council Kawardha , Distt-Kabirdham. (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, ^i ^' ^. HTGH COimT OF CHHATTT80ARH AT BTTA8PUR WRTT PETITION (Q No. 5666 of2011 PETITIONER RE8PONDENT8 Tilakbai. VRR8U8 StMe ofChhattisgarh & Another^ Amit WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFWDIA SB: Hon'We Shri Satish K. A^nihotn^l. Present: Shri Ashok Vaishnav^ Advocate fbr thenetitioner. Shii Shashatik Tliakur, Paiiel Lawyw for tlie State/respotident No. 1. Shri Anm Sao^ Advoeate for the respondent No, 2. ORnRR (Passed on 26th day ofSeptember, 2011) 1, At the very outset Shri Sao^ leamed coua^el apparing for the respondent No. 2, on ia^tnictioiL submite that no demolition in respect of the property m dispirte shall take place withoirt followmg the due proce-ss of law and withoiit affbrdmg an opportimity ofhearing to the petitioner. 2. In view ofthe above siibmission, accordmg to leamed coiimel for the petitioner^ notNng survives for adjydication in this matter at this s?tage 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the aforest^ted observation, Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge n..