IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13178 of 2011 PALTU JHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 05.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. It would appear from perusal of Annexure-2 of this application that earlier petitioner was granted privilege of anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 31.08.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 25780 of 2010 with condition that he would appear before the trial court on each and every date till the disposal of the case and if he fails to do so without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted to the petitioner by this Court shall be deemed to be cancelled. It appears from perusal of the impugned order that when the case was committed to the court of Sessions, the petitioner made himself absent as a result of which his bail bond was cancelled. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner had no knowledge of commitment of the case and furthermore, he fell ill as a result of which he could not appear before the trial court. It is further pointed out by him that the petitioner has himself surrendered before the court below, which is evident from the impugned order itself. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 2 Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-I, Madhubani in connection with Sessions Trial No. 47 of 2011/05 of 2011 arising out of Complaint Case No. 747 of 2010. It is made clear that the conditions imposed by this Court vide order dated 31.08.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 25780 of 2010 shall remain in force till the disposal of the above stated Sessions Trial No. 47 of 2011/05 of 2011. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )