IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. L.P.A. No.934 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 1.2.2010 Gram Panchayat Tharoli. -----Appellant Vs. The State of Haryana & others. -----Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present:- Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Advocate for the appellant. ----- ORDER: The matter was considered at length on 25.9.2009 when a detailed order was passed. Thereafter, on 27.11.2009 following order was passed:- “Learned counsel for the appellant states that he has taken instructions, in pursuance of order dated 25.9.2009. A Committee of Panchayat is the selecting body. On being asked as to who gives appointment letter and who gives wages, learned counsel is unable to show that Panchayat paid the wages or gave the letter of appointment. In absence of this the Panchayat may not be held to be appointing or the disciplinary authority of Anganwari workers. Clause 14 of the instructions, shown by LPA No.934 of 2009 learned counsel, specifically mentions that appointment letter could be issued by Child Development Project Officer (CDPO). If this position is correct, there may be no ground to challenge the impugned order of learned Single Judge. On request of learned counsel for the appellant, adjourned to 1.2.2010.” Learned counsel for the appellant is not able to add anything to the submissions earlier made. In view of above, we do not find any ground to interfere with the view taken by learned Single Judge. The appeal is dismissed. ( ADARSH KUMAR GOEL ) JUDGE February 01, 2010 ( ALOK SINGH ) ashwani JUDGE 2