IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6969 of 2005 ABHIMANYU THAKUR & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 25.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioners are seeking regularization under the respondents since according to them they came to be appointed in the regular establishment in a temporary manner in terms of annexure-1. That was on 9.12.1994. Thereafter no work is being taken from them. From the counter affidavit which has been filed on behalf of the respondents it has been stated that the petitioners were terminated from service vide various orders issued in the year 1998 itself and the same was communicated to them. But despite such order they want a direction for regularization. The stand of the respondent is that large scale illegal appointments came to be made numbering 883, when this fact and position came to the knowledge of Chief Engineer (Mechanical), steps were taken to undo the mischief which was done by certain authority. Since the petitioners were working on daily wages their services came to be terminated vide annexure-C series. In view of the above stated circumstances there is no occasion for giving direction for regularization of these petitioners and that too when they were removed in the year 1998. This writ application has not merit and it is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)