n'f'^py CTTHEHIGHCOURTQFCHHATTISG WMT TITION (81 N0^/Lf OF 2011 PBTITIONER: ^^s-^ '^a^.^-'""....--0 ^^!^""....--"" ^^^^'^^ ^•i'.'<y". _...•••"'''" ^ \^ RESPQNDENTS: ^" Raj Kumari Ahirwar, D/o Laxmi Prasad Ahirwar, aged about 22 years, R/o village Block Colony, Janakpur, Post Janakpur, Thasil Bharatpur, District Korea (CG). Versus l'. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur / (CG). 2. Chief Executive Officer, ZUa Panchayat, Korea, Baikunthpur, Dist. Korea / (CG). 3. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Bharatpur, District Korea (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLB 226 OF THE consTiTunoN OF INDIA ''r^e.fv N> @) SB : HOEg'BLB MR. JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKBR W,P,(S1,NO, 714972011 Raj Kumari Ahirwar versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others Shri Jitendra Shrivastava, counsel for fhe petitioaer. Shri N.Naha Roy, P.L. for fhe State. (01.12.2011) Grievance of the petitioner in the present petitiou is that fhough she is performuig her duly as Shifesha Karmi Grade III but she has not beea paid her salaiy frota August 2008 to April 2009 & June 2010 to October 2010. Coiinsel for fhe petitioner suonuts that the petitioner has already iaa.de represeatation (Annexure P/6) but tili date no response has been giyen by fhe coinpetent aufhority. State counsel subiaits fhat let ftie petitioner m.ake a fresh representation to fhe respondent N0.3 anfl in tara fbe same would be decided ia. accordaiice with law subiect to the verification of fhe facts. The present petition is disposed of witli a direction to the petitioner to -make a fresti representation to the respondent N0.3 wifhia two weeks froia today and ia tum the said aufhority wUl decide the representation within a further period ofthice weeks. It is ra.ade clear th.at this court has not expressed any opinion on the ruerits of the case aud fhe aufhority concemed would be at Jiberty to decide the representation strictly in accordaace with law. ^ Sd/- \ Pritiaker Diwaker