COCP No.1718 of 2011 (O & M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1718 of 2011 (O & M) Date of decision: 19.12.2011 Chattar Pal .... Petitioner Versus T.V.N.S. Parshad, Chief Administrator and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. J.K. Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.P.S. Batta, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.: (Oral) On 27.08.2010, this Court while disposing of CWP No.19762 of 2009 had directed the respondent-State to deposit the pro rata retiral benefits with the Board, who was to count the service rendered by the petitioner in the PWD (B & R) department towards the qualifying service for payment of pensionary/retiral benefits. It was further directed that the pensionary/retiral benefits of the petitioner shall be redetermined and paid to him within a period of three months and the petitioner was held entitled to the statutory interest wherever payable and on all other benefits, interest at the rate of 6% per annum. The pro rata interest was to be paid by the State for causing unnecessary delay in pensionary contribution and rest of the interest was to be paid by the Board. The grievance of the COCP No.1718 of 2011 (O & M) ::2:: petitioner is that the said directions have not been complied with. 2. Upon notice having been issued to the respondents, reply by way of an affidavit of respondent No.1-T.V.S.N. Parsad, Chief Administrator, Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board, Mandi Bhawan, Sector 6, Panchkula, has been filed in Court today. Same is taken on record. A copy thereof has been given to learned counsel for the petitioner. It has been stated in the reply that an amount of Rs.15,21,178/- which includes interest upto date has been paid to the petitioner and in the reply already filed on behalf of respondent No.2, it has been stated that an amount of Rs.1,49,028/-, as per calculation sheet (Annexure R-2/5), has been paid to the petitioner. 3. In view of the above, no further action is called for in the present petition. Same stands disposed of. 4. However, it shall be open to the petitioner to take recourse to the legal remedies, in accordance with law, in case, any grievance still subsists. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE December 19, 2011 sukhpreet COCP No.1718 of 2011 (O & M) ::3::