IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-27748 of 2009 (O/M). Date of Decision : November 18, 2009. Amrinder Singh @ Bunni and another ...... Petitioner(s). Versus. State of Punjab ..... Respondent(s). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH. Present:- Mr. Puneet Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. A.S. Rai, A.A.G. Punjab, for respondent-State. AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL). Counsel for the petitioners states that in compliance of the order dated 06.10.2009, passed by this Court, the petitioners have joined the investigation. This fact is not disputed by counsel for respondent-State, on instructions from S.I. Devinder Pal Singh, Police Station Phase-I, Mohali. He further states that the recovery of danda has been effected from the petitioners. Counsel for respondent-State further states that Section 318 I.P.C. has been added on 07.10.2009 on supplementary statement given by the complainant. Counsel for the petitioners states that the incident is of 28.08.2009, which led to the registration of the F.I.R. against the petitioners. The petitioners were granted the benefit of anticipatory bail by this Court, Criminal Misc. No. M-27748 of 2009 . vide order dated 06.10.2009. It is only thereafter that the complainant has got recorded supplementary statement, leading to the addition of Section 318 I.P.C., which is clearly an afterthought and with an intention to deprive of the petitioners the benefit of anticipatory bail, granted by this Court. Looking into the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, the order dated 06.10.2009 is hereby confirmed. However, the petitioners shall be bound by the provisions of Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) JUDGE November 18, 2009. sjks. -2-