IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9881 of 2011 RAJNI DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 13.04.2011 Petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered under Sections 302, 201, 120B/34 of the I.P.C. It appears that initially the informant lodged the case under Sections 302, 201, 120B/34 of the I.P.C. for the death of the husband of the petitioner. Petitioner is the second wife of the deceased. It appears that the informant who is the police officer during investigation found the complicity of this petitioner and lodged the present case on 06.04.2010. The informant was not required to lodge another case. If the complicity of this petitioner, who is informant of the initial case was found then the investigating agency ought to have chargesheeted the petitioner in the case lodged earlier by him. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that son of the petitioner has been granted regular bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 22418 of 2010. Let learned Court below pass appropriate order with regard to regular bail of the petitioner, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned Court below 2 within a period of four weeks and prays for regular bail which may be disposed off preferably on the same day. With the observations made above, the application stands disposed off in connection with Phulwari Sharif P.S. Case No. 182 of 2010. Let the order of this Court be transmitted through Fax to the learned Court below at the cost of the petitioner. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)