1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 106 OF 2009 IN W. P. NO. 1558 OF 2008(P) & 1606 OF 2007 (Pending) Shaikh Vakil Shaikh Tanumiya Vs. Suryakant Ambadikar & Ors. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Shri D. C. R. Mishra Adv for petitioner. Shri S. N. Gaikwad Adv H/f Shri V. G. Wankhede Adv for respondents. CORAM: C. L. PANGARKAR J. Dated: 19 th NOVEMBER, 2009. Heard counsel for the petitioner and the respondents. This application has been filed for taking an action in contempt against the respondents. The Industrial Court had passed an order directing the reinstatement of the petitioner. The respondents preferred a writ petition before this Court. This Court had admitted the writ petition but has refused to grant interim relief to the respondents in the writ petition. Shri Mishra learned counsel for the petitioner submits 2 that since this Court has refused to grant interim relief the respondent was bound to obey the order and he wants that contempt action should be taken against respondents. This Court cannot execute order of the subordinate Court. Petitioner is at liberty to take action as may be advised to the petitioner under law. No action in contempt can lie for non implementation of the order passed by the subordinate Court to this Court. The petitioner is at liberty to execute the order as the law may permit him to do. Petition is dismissed in limine. JUDGE svk 3 4 5