IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10512 of 2011 Bachni Mestarani, W/o Feku Ram, resident of Village Mathia Zirat, P.S. Chhatauni, Dist. East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Secretary Urban Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Deputy Secretary cum Director, Urban Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4. The District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari. 5. The Motihari Municipality (Nagar Parishad), through its Chairman. 6. The Chairman, Nagar Parishad, Motihari, East Champaran. 7. The Executive Officer, Motihari Municipality, Main Raod, Motihari, P.S. Chhatauni, Dist. East Champaran. ... ... Respondents. ----------- 2. 5.7.2011. Heard Shri Sangeet Deokuliar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Ranjan Kumar Dubey, learned A.C. to G.P.23, who appears on behalf of respondent nos.1 to 4 and Shri Raghwanand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.5 to 7/Motihari Municipality (Nagar Parishad). The petitioner, who retired as Sweeper from Motihari Municipality (Nagar Parishad) with effect from 1.4.2008, has prayed for directing the respondents to make payment of amount of gratuity with calculation of Dearness allowances, Leave Encashment, Pension and difference of amount due to revise pension. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the 2 petitioner has also represented before the authority concerned. However, till date, neither any decision has been taken nor retiral dues have been cleared by the respondent/Municipality. With the consent of parties, the writ petition is being disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no.7/Executive Officer, Motihari Municipality (Nagar Parishad) within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, respondent no.7 is required to examine the same and pass order in its right perspective redressing the grievances of the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of filing of such representation. If the respondent no.7 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for clearing all the retiral dues of the petitioner within aforesaid time i.e. two months. Even in case of refusal, respondent no.7 is directed to pass a speaking order within aforesaid time. It is made clear that petitioner 3 shall be entitled to get admissible statutory interest on delayed payment. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)