1 S.B.C.W. NO. 5350/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 5350/2009 Krishna Kant Sharma Vs. State of Rajsthan and Ors. Date of Order : : 29.05.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R. PANWAR Mr. R.C.Joshi for the petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Tak, Dy. Govt. Counsel for respondents. BY THE COURT By the instant writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order Annex.8 dated 24.10.2007 and Annex.12 dated 25.1.2008 passed by respondent District Magistrate, Hanumangarh and Divisional Commissioner, Bikaner respectively. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. The controversy involved in the instant writ petition stands concluded by order dated 29.9.2008 passed by this Court in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3959/2008 “Jodh Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.” and 49 others. In terms of the order dated 29.9.2008 passed by this Court in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3959/2008 “Jodh Singh 2 S.B.C.W. NO. 5350/2009 Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.” and 49 others, and for the reasons mentioned therein, the instant writ petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to apply afresh for grant of licence before the concerned District Magistrate, the Licensing Authority, if so advised and if the petitioner applies afresh, the Licensing Authority shall decide the same strictly in accordance with law. (H.R. PANWAR), J. Rp 3 S.B.C.W. NO. 5350/2009 S.B.Civil Misc. Stay Petition No.8536/2008 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5350/2008 Date of Order : 29/05/2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R. PANWAR Mr. R.C.Joshi for the petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Tak, Dy. Govt. Counsel for respondents. Since the writ petition itself has been dismissed, the stay petition also stands dismissed. (H.R. PANWAR), J. Rp