IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD AUGUST 2011 / 12TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 20741 of 2011(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.A.LAILA W/O.ABOOBACKER, AGED 58, MOLATH HOUSE, AMBADY MOOLA, KAKKANADU P.O., KOCHI-30, REPRESENTED BY P/A HOLDER ABOOBACKER S/O.ABDUL RAZAK, AGED 63, MOLATH HOUSE, AMBADY MOOLA, KAKKANADU P.O., KOCHI-30. BY ADV. SRI.P.MARTIN JOSE SRI.M.A.MOHAMMED SIRAJ SRI.P.PRIJITH SRI.ANEESH JAMES RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANADU, PIN 682030. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT KOCHI, PIN 682 001. 3. M/S.MIR REALTERS PVT.LTD., REGISTERED OFFICE AT FIRST FLOOR, M.M.BUILDINGS, ERNAKULAM NORTH NEAR TOWN HALL, ERNAKULAM, PIN 682 018. GP SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 20741 of 2011 APPENDIX EXHIBITS EXT.P1- TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 3.7.2010 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXT.P2- TRUE COPY OF REPORT DATED 27.8.2010 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.P3- TRUE COPY OF SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED 8.9.2010 ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY OF THRIKKAKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH EXT.P4- TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 21.6.2011 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER EXT.P5- TRUE COPY OF PRELIMINARY ORDER DATED 21.6.2011 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT (True copy) P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).20741/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 3rd day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT The alleged inaction on the part of the second respondent on Ext.P1 complaint made by the petitioner making allegations against the third respondent that a tower crane is used for their construction, is complained in this writ petition. 2. Petitioner submits that the second respondent has taken cognizance of Ext.P1 and passed Ext.P5 order and parties have already entered appearance before the second respondent. 3. If the facts stated by the petitioner are true, the second respondent shall expedite the proceedings on the production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs