<:P g ”/W 1 / m THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (c.G.) ‘ $73¢ w.P.No.. . . . . /2003 / Con-ha. o n 2 Petitionerg -‘ (1) Vishnu Ial Sahu,age 35 years, s/o late Nanku Ram Sahn shiksha Karmi Varga - 3, Prathamik Shala Palari,. kho Gurur, mstt. DURG (cG). ww’ (2) ,3?” Pradip Kunar Sahu Age 23 years S/o late Deo Kumar‘Sa‘hu QQ X Shiksha Karmi Varga -3a ' ." Prathamik Shala, § Village.- Kolhiamar khn Guwr’ Distt- wRG (CG). .‘.\%\~\\\x . Bhusha& 181 %13, Q' Q‘Q $ Qé‘: $¢‘ £9 i‘92f a?” Age - 24‘years 78/0 - Late Mohan Ial mla, shiksha Karmi Varga - 3, Village - PURUR, Tab. GURUR Dis-ht. DURG (CG). Versus §espondents - (1) sate Govt. o: c.G., ' Through - The Secretary, School Education Dept-tn D.K.s.Bhawan, RAIPUR (m). (2) Distt. Education Officer, DURG (c.G. ). / ks ‘(3) Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat GURUR, Distt. Burg (cc). (4) Block Education Officer, GURUR, Distt. DURG (CG). 2426:0NSTITU1E0N OF mug ': 1 wwi qh ii ::2:: lay}: mm TION UNDER ARTICLE 2 wk*mgzr mm: a J XI-HC—22 - aiongwith a copybf ihe petifion an fA'om today and Van such represent of ihe respond‘ems shai§ decide th with my as eariy a$ possib§e prefe Ehe date bf receipt of representatio _ With the aforeeaid cbsewé‘t: g C}wri 2m 2.26% Shri RS. Shrivastava, coun Shri PS. Koshy, Dy. Advocaie Generai wifh Shri Vivek Sharma, Panei Lawyer ror rne state er Chhattisgarn. Heard. 5 ei fer ‘the petifioners. eig’fy :i' thie order Wr‘zhin a peried of one month ation being fried, the competen‘é authcriiy " ye same an its own merirs in accorciance rabiy within a pericd effo‘ur months from 'i. one, inie petition stands disposed of. Ce£1ifiedr copy as per ruies. sdi- ‘ i Fakhruddm e W ’ Judge _ Learned counsei for ihe petizioners submits that thgma‘tter reiates to reguiarization of services of the petitioners. Learned cgunsei submits that for the present ends of justice wit he served if a direction is givento the respondent authorities’to decide the’representatio’n eithe petitioners. The prayer is not Opposed by the other'side. f‘ Having considered and with out expressing any opinion on the merit of the case the petitioners are directed to make a detaiied representation r raising their grievances before the competent authority of respondents ’ s