Civil Revision No. 2603 of 2003 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 2603 of 2003 Date of Decision: 4.9.2009 Mulkha Ram and Others …Petitioners Versus Tilak Raj and Others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Ashok Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. None for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Anil Rathee, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, for respondents No.3 to 5. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) On 3.8.2009, this Court had passed the following order:- “In the present case, Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Fatehabad, allowed the application of the plaintiff Milkha Ram, Smt. Narayani Devi and Harbans Lal, and restrained the defendants from restoring the watercourse. Aggrieved against the same, defendants had filed an appeal. The appeal was accepted and stay application filed by the plaintiffs was dismissed. Aggrieved against the same, present Civil Revision No. 2603 of 2003 2 revision petition was filed. On May 24, 2004, revision petition was admitted and the parties were directed to maintain status quo. Status report be called from the Court of Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Fatehabad, regarding the outcome of the Civil Suit No. 51-C/14.3.2003. Status report be called by the Registry through FAX. To await for status report, adjourned to 21st August, 2009”. The Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division)-cum-Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Fatehabad, has sent a communication that case under reference was decided on 11.8.2007 by Mr. Sudeep Goel, the then Civil Judge (Junior Division), Fatehabad. Mr. Ashok Verma, Advocate, appearing for the petitioner states that present petition has been rendered infructuous. As prayed, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge September 4, 2009 “DK”