IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.330 of 2008 RAJMANI DEVI wife of Late Akshayawat Sharma, resident of village Panduki, P.S.- Goha District- Aurangabad. Versus 1. THE PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, through Chief Executive Officer, Patna 2. Chief Executive Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation. ----------- 8 09.04.2009 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that during the pendency of this writ application the amounts as indicated in the order issued by the Corporation as contained in memo no. 149 dated 21.01.2009 vide Annexure-A to the counter affidavit has been paid to him which he has received, however the amount indicated therein is not correct as the Corporation ought to have given a detailed chart as well showing the calculation. Besides the above, it is submitted that the petitioner was entitled to the family pension and also other grievances with regard to calculation of the pensionable period of her husband which has not been redressed for which he has filed a representation on 24.01.2009 (Annexure-2 to the rejoinder) before the Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna. Learned counsel appearing for the Corporation submits that all the retiral dues which is admissible to the petitioner has been paid save and - 2 - except the leave encashment. The same is controverted by the petitioner. In the above circumstances, petitioner is permitted to file a fresh representation before the Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna within a period of eight weeks along with the certified copy of the present order giving details of his unpaid claims supported by relevant document, if any. In this view of the matter, it is directed that in case such representation is filed by the petitioner the Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna shall consider and dispose of the same by a reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months on receipt of such representation taking into consideration the grievances raised in the representation. In case the representation is disposed of in favour of the petitioner, the above respondent shall simultaneously issue necessary orders for redressal of the grievances of the petitioner as per the order passed by him on the representation of the petitioner. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)