IN THE HON’B w. P. (S g 7 2oo7 ($3.) ) é / / PETITIONER ANIS FATIMA ZAIDI / W/o Shri Syed Qumber Mehdi Zaidi Aged About 46 Yrs R/o Masanganj Bilaspur Tahsl 85 Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through, ecretary Department of Women and Child Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Project Officer, Women and Child Development Project ilaspur Disrict Bilaspur. B t Q?‘L / . Women Programme and Child Officer Development Bilaspur District Bilaspur. /4. Smt. .Richa Tiwari - Supervisor Integrated Child Development Service (Urban), Distt. Bilaspur. (C.G.) / ‘V‘T'v’ I g) \§é$kg$“¥ 1X- G Rg to Cb ” .I www / i%& r “ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ,w LE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR i VERSUS / S ,3 " \ i i V l HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 6371 of2007 PETITIONER : Anis Fatima Zaidi. 2 é VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Present: Shri Prakash Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri Ashish Surana, Advocate for the respondent No. 4. ORDER (ORAL (Passed on 27 day of August, 201 1) Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondent No. I to 3 submits that the petitioner has already continued at the original ’ place of posting for more than three years on account of interim order granted by this Court on 05.11.2007. The State/respondent No. 1 to 3 may be granted liberty to pass appropriate orders keeping in View public interest and administrative exigency. Shri Thakur thrther submits that the State/respondent No. 1 to 3 shall not insist upon compliance of the impugned order dated 03.10.2007 (Annexure P/l) in respect ofthe petitioner. At this stage, when no effect could be given tothe impugqed order dated 03.10.2007 (Annexure P/l) on account of the interim order dated 15.11.2007, thus, it is not necessary to go into legality and validity ofthe aforestated impugned order. 3. In View of the above, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs- Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge