r>l"l:5^1 n'^Cl ^ yb.»<w' •^t.tw^'- " fff^ / IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. ( S L N0. 'b5'\ QF 2009 PETITIONER ^...;^<5- c..^"v..'s"" .-••• ^^;"/ ..y _^ n..~' ^' v^".^..- ' ¥^-"' fc^ ^.^w C<S/\<.1" > ;^ "/ /\ V RESPONDENTS 1. P. S. Sudhakar, S/o. Late B. S. Sudhakar, aged about 48 years, working as Executive Engineer, Rural Engineering Service, Division - Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretaiy, Panchayat & Rural Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^.WtSs^. ^•<&w^'^<^ >,:•<-" '~"\%x y-f','^ ^ "^ 8!~ i' ' .-<^x4\*^- i I. ^».».¥^?i<ts!! ^ ft l^ \<-fr f^ ',''*•• SJ^^ '/^s: ^>-,^y s'ivr/ \$^j^ ^f{y'/ Chief Engineer, Panchayat 85 Rural Development Department, Rural Engineering Service, Vikas Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). Shri J. L. Patanwar, at present working as Sub Divisional Officer, Rural Engineering Service, Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA rfS?l°3a%,. .^-^ ~'\ ' ^.^ .^^5^ ^ ^^ '^^?^\ (3 '°^':33.^'^''<:::.;i i9^ .•^" <!„. -rf' .•? "^s^ ,<^ 6 .r' sm^i %t R;-<i<* ^ 0 3^ •<fi'4ici^, anl-H'Ko, fq<')i'yli< .^J..£..L^.)....^^.i. sn^l '(R%' ('^3^?) ^ SB: Hon. Mr. Justice Pritmker Dlwaker Divi^ion Shri P.S. Koshy and| the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakj- 2/State. Challenge in this passed by the State been Sransferred from the Engineering Servtee, Officer, Rurai Engineeringl Korba. Counsei for the pe( petitioner Is senior to resp( has been made in charge position remains that th| respondent No.3 wouid be He submits that the instructions not to post a^ Engineer above his senior. However, in the fact^ counsel for the petitioner s|i this petition with liberty petilfon is to the order dated 29.6.2009 Gover|iment by which the petitioner has j)ost of Executive Engineer, Rurai iilaspur to Sub Divisional Service Podi - Uproda, District Shri Vinod Deshmukh counsel for lir PL for res titioner submits that though the ()ndent No.3 yet respondent No.3 lExscutive Engineer and now the ^ petitioner vi/ho is senior fo |required to work under his junior. G|3vernment has already issued ly junior as in charge Executive and circumstances of the case, ubmits that he wants to withdraw make a representation to the I® !t»uf\V^ito l},'W\st<l <l«l^]<t'IW—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000. 'XI-HC—78 SD^CT W S'li* 'cT^T 3?T^?T Sfi+lioh »^^ ^SET';^irai?PT, '^ftWTS, fs|c)iylj,< WqpffWTi^ 3i^1 Traq? ( yit^'Ki1!) 's^iw ^rfsa sffl^F authorities concerned. He authorities concerned to expeditiously. Accordingly, the petit^n liberty as aforesaid. However, if the petiti(}ner a period of 10 days from tfie order, the authorities conce|r a further period of fhree we|eks same. Till then the petiti present place of posting. <t)i14itn<ii'i *i!^dt* ^T fs^l <f<it^.K ^sifOTsn^i |also prays for a direction to |decide the said representation itfcn is dismissed as withdrawn Vi/ith makes a representation within date of receipt of copy of this shall decide the same within from the date of receipt of the orter shail not be relieved from his Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge i...