IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.110 of 2007 FIROZ RAI Versus REHANA KHATOON ----------- 2 14/8/2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the opposite party. In the opinion of this Court the amount of Rs. 1,500/- for the wife, opposite party and Rs. 500/- for the child by way of maintenance under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure cannot be said to be either excessive or illegal. Counsel for the petitioner at this stage submits that, in fact, he is prepared to restore relationship with all dignity with the opposite party, wife and the petitioner would like that the opposite party, wife may stay together with him. This submission, however, has been sought to be contradicted by counsel for the opposite party, who has drawn attention of this Court towards paragraph nos. 7 and 8 of the impugned order to say that such effort of reconciliation and settlement made by the court below had failed on account of specific grievance of the opposite party that she was treated and subjected by both physical and mental torture. That being so, this Court would not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly, this civil revision application is dismissed with a direction to the court below to ensure that the arrears and current amount, as directed by it in the impugned order, shall be realized from the petitioner within a period of 2 two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J. ) Abhay Kumar