IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6946 of 2011 1.SATYABHAMA DEVI, w/o Ganesh Yadav. 2.Ganesh Yadav, Son of Late Teju Yadav. 3.Ajit Yadav, Son of Ganesh Yadav.. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners being the parents and the brother of the husband are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Amarpur P.S.Case No.124/2001(G.R. No.863/2001) pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka. The marriage was performed in the year 1999 when the victim died in 2001 the accusation is of administering poison by entire in-laws family. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner, that the investigation was kept pending awaiting the viscera report but ultimately in 2005 the charge sheet was submitted and the cognizance has been taken in 2010 and the husband is in custody. This court is not inclined to interfere on the ground that the case was instituted in 2001. 2 Let the Learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner keeping in view that the cognizance has been taken in 2010 and the fact that the accusation is against all the accused persons of administering poison but no injury particularly resisting injury were found on the person of the deceased and if possible, dispose off the regular bail application of the petitioners on the same day if the petitioners surrender and pray for regular bail within a period of four weeks from today without being prejudiced the order of this court. This application is disposed off with the aforesaid observations. Nitesh (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)