IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1471 of 2011 1. HIPPY RAJWAR 2. LALU RAJWAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 22.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Although, petitioners are named in the first information report but it would appear from perusal of the first information report itself, that co-accused Raju Rajwar took the victim from his house and so far as petitioners are concerned, the informant is not an eye-witness of the incident of alleged assault. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor fairly conceded that in course of investigation, none of the witness has claimed to have seen the incident of alleged assault. Considering the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram, Rohtas in connection with Rohtas (Amjhora) P.S. Case No. 100 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )