:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.596 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.596 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.596 OF 2008 IN IN IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.6591 OF 2008 SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.6591 OF 2008 SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.6591 OF 2008 Shubhangi Vijay Manjrekar & Anr. ...Applicants. v. Shantaram Hari Amberkar & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.Milind Parab , adv. for the Applicants. Mr.Sudhir Prabhu , adv. for the Respondent No.1. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 12th September, 2008. DATE: 12th September, 2008. DATE: 12th September, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Parties. 2. The applicant has filed a suit for partition and separate possession to the extent of her share contending that the suit properties were ancestral joint family properties. According to the respondent no.1, property was bequeathed to him under a will executed by his father. The applicant contends that she was not aware when the appeal was dismissed. It is true that her advocate was appearing in the appeal, however, in my considered opinion, taking into consideration the stake involved in the matter, it will be in the interest of justice to allow application. Therefore, application is allowed and delay is condoned. The Second Appeal be registered subject to removal of other office :2: objections, if any and be listed for admission. 3. Application stands disposed off. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)