1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:24.02.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH WA(MD)No.264 of 2011 Ganesan :Appellant -Vs- 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Home Department, Fort.St.George, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Director General of Police, Chennai 600 004. 3.The Director, The Tamil Nadu Uniform, Civil Code Recruitment Board, Chennai 600 003. 4.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai. :Respondents PRAYER:Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 19.11.2010 made in W.P.(MD).No.7243 of 2010 on the file of this Court. WP 7243/10:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order in R.C.No.178123/Rect II(1)/2009 dated 4.5.2010 on the file of the second respondent and to quash the same as illegal and consequently, to direct the respondents to appoint th petitioner as the Sub Inspector of Police. For Appellant : Mr.R.Venkatasan For Respondents : Mr.R.Janakiramalu,Special Government Pleader JUDGMENT [Judgment of the Court was delivered BY N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR, J] This Writ Appeal is directed against the order dated 19.11.2010 made in W.P.(MD).No.7243 of 2010. 2.The appellant herein filed the said Writ Petition challenging the order dated 04.05.2010 passed by the second respondent herein and for a consequential direction to the respondents to appoint the appellant as a Sub – Inspector of Police. 3.The learned Single Judge, by order dated 19.11.2010, dismissed the said Writ Petition and imposed costs of Rs.5,000/- [Rupees Five Thousand Only], which was directed to be paid by the appellant within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. 4.Challenging the said order dated 19.11.2010, the appellant is now before this Court with the present Writ Appeal. 5.Today, when the Writ Appeal is taken up for admission, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that he is not pressing the Writ Appeal, insofar as the merits of the contentions and the findings of the learned Single Judge and the imposition of costs of Rs.5,000/- alone is challenged. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 6.The said submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant is recorded. 7.In view of the said submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant, the learned Special Government Pleader was directed to take notice and on perusal of the order dated 19.11.2010, the learned Special Government Pleader fairly submitted that the Government is not interested in getting costs of Rs.5,000/- from the appellant and the portion, i.e., award of costs of Rs.5,000/- payable by the appellant, alone may be deleted. 8.The said submission made by the learned Special Government Pleader is also recorded. 9.In view of the said submission made by the learned counsel on either side, the Writ Appeal is disposed of by deleting the award of costs of Rs.5,000/- alone and insofar as other aspects are concerned, the findings given by the learned Single Judge are confirmed. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (LA) / TRUE COPY / Assistant Registrar To: 1.The Home Department, The State of Tamil Nadu, Fort.St.George, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Director General of Police, Chennai 600 004. 3.The Director, The Tamil Nadu Uniform, Civil Code Recruitment Board, Chennai 600 003. 4.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai. +1CC to Mr.R.Venkatesan, Advocate. SR.No.9860. NB RP/24.02.2011/2P/6C. JUDGMENT MADE IN W.A.(MD).No.264 of 2011 24.02.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/