IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2753 of 2008 Usha Kumari, wife of Sheo Kumar Singh, village Nimra Pali, PS Dhanarua, district Patna – Petitioner. Vs. 1) The State of Bihar, 2) The Collector, Patna. 3) The Dist. Welfare Officer, Patna. 4) The C.D.P.O. Dhanarua, Dist. Patna. 5) Mukhiya, Nimra Panchayat, village Nimra, PO Panditganj, PS Dhanarua, Patna. 6) Panchayat Sachiv, Nimra Panchayat, Ps Dhanarua, Patna. 7) Pinki Kumari, wife of Jitendra Kumar, village Nimra, PS Dhanarua, Dist. Patna – Respondents. 2 5.4.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by appointment of respondent no.7 as Aangan Bari Sevika on the ground that she is not the resident of the Centre where the appointment had taken place. It is further stated that the date of the meeting was surreptitiously shifted. If the petitioner is aggrieved by order of appointment of Aangan Bari Sevika, the proper course should be that she should have filed an application before the District Magistrate who would have taken steps in accordance with law, to conduct an enquiry. If the District Magistrate finds that prima facie the case of the petitioner had merit, then only he would be required to issue notice to the parties and take further steps in the matter. The petitioner should not have filed a writ petition directly in this court as there is a provision for remedy under the guide lines provided for appointment of Aangan Bari Sevika. This writ petition is dismissed. The petitioner may always make a complaint before 2 the District Magistrate, if so advised. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)