THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR W.P.No.14099 OF 2011 ORDER : (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) This writ petition is filed assailing the legality and validity of the interim order dated 13-04-2011 in O.A.No.2142 of 2011 on the file of the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (for brevity ‘the Tribunal’), wherein the Tribunal passed the order as follows: “Pending disposal of the O.A., there shall be an interim direction to the respondents, to consider the claim of the petitioners for promotion to the post of Deputy Superintendents of Police, from the category of Inspectors of Police, as per the seniority list dated 29-04-2010 of the Inspector of Police (Civil) prepared as per the orders of the Hon’ble High Court in W.P.M.P.No.11865 of 2010 in W.P.No.9186 of 2010m, dated 26- 04-2010.” 2. The grievance of the petitioners, who are not the parties in the said O.A., is that the due to the orders passed by the Tribunal, their rights are virtually effected when they are to be considered for promotion. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Additional Advocate General, appearing for the learned Government Pleader for Services-I, for the respondents 1 and 2 and the learned counsel for the respondents 3 to 7, 9 and 10. 4. As seen from the record and after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners, it is clear that the respondents 3 to 7 filed O.A.No.2142 of 2011 on the file of the Tribunal and obtained interim direction as stated supra. Meanwhile the petitioners approached this court and filed the present writ petition challenging the order of the Tribunal, dated 13-04-2011. When once the matter is seized by the Tribunal, it is for the Tribunal to decide the issue and adjudicate the matter. Therefore, if the writ petition is entertained at this stage, it will lead to multiplicity of proceedings and therefore, to avoid the issuance of parallel proceedings and future conflicts, we are declined to exercise our extra ordinary jurisdiction to grant any direction in the present writ petition. Hence, this writ petition is misconceived and the same is liable to be dismissed. 5. In the result, the writ petition is dismissed. However, the Tribunal is directed to dispose of the O.A. as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from today. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________________ JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED Dated: 07-06-2011 ________________________ JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR kvr