IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43589 of 2010 1. SOHANLAL TATMA S/O LATE CHETHARO TATMA 2. SHIVAM TATMA @ SHIVAM KUMAR TATMA BOTH R/O VILLAGE- NAWTOLY P.S.- SIMRAHA, DISTRICT- ARARIA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.03.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make correction in the name of the petitioner no.1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the state. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 366 (A) and 120 (B) of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted from the narrative of the victim recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. wherein she has stated that it was the petitioner no. 2 who had brought her to the court for the statement, it appears to be a case of consent. Considering the same, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 188/2010, 2 subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioners. (ii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iii) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date if they fails to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)