IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.535 of 2009 Prabhunath Singh, son of late Raghuni Singh, resident of Village- Lohara Tola Shivpur, P.O. Badlu Tola, Pergana- Bal, Police station-Chapra Muffasil, District- Saran. ---- Defendant --- Petitioner. Versus 1.Rajeshwar Singh 2. Mahesh Singh, both sons of Yadunandan Singh 3(i). Raj Ballabh Singh, son of Budha kuer (ii) Kamalpato DeviD/O Budha Kuer 4. Raj Ballabh Singh, son of Rama Singh 5. Parvati Kuer, wife of Ambika Singh 6. Dharamnath Singh, son of Shyama Singh, all resident of Village-Lohara Tola Shivpur, P.O. Badlu Tola, P.S. Chapra Muffasil, District- Saran --- Plaintiffs --- Opposite parties. ---------------------------------- 7. 25.11.2011 None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Heard Mr. Udai Shankar Singh for opposite party nos. 1, 2 and 4 to 6. The defendant of Title Suit No.161 of 2006, has preferred this civil revision application under the provisions of Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and raises a grievance with respect to the order dated 13.1.2009, passed by the learned Vth Civil Judge, Senior Division, Saran at Chapra, whereby his application under Section 4(C) of the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956, has been rejected. The defendant had prayed that, in view of the consolidation proceeding going on in the area, the suit has abated. 2 We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of the opposite parties. It appears that question of validity of Patta is in question which can be decided only by the civil court. Law is well settled that suit is the basic remedy of the citizen of this country, and can be displaced by a different forum created under a specialized enactment. Law is equally well settled that, in case of doubt and difficulty, the court shall lean in favour of the jurisdiction of the civil court. We, therefore, agree with the impugned order. The civil revision application is dismissed. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar, J.)