^>.t ]R^ ff_J^ ®By?'tfp cl"'';Ti^ C-^-/£Z?L^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^0^-2- /2006 PETITIONER ^••^: ^'o^y^' •w^- Navin Chand Sai Paikara, Son of Shri Narrottam Raiu. Paikara, Aged about 38 years, Assistant Teacher, Priinajty School Kachhuwakani, Block Kaashabel, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS rrt*./ <^?£- ^- &. fe>,;i^»*^-i Sla. :! '• ys'SS •^.^-^.^.ff '"%%3^.t. ^" ^ .3. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Departinent of Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). The District Education Officer, District Jashpur (C.G.). The Bock Education OfEcer, Block ICanshabel, District Jashpur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARY_OR_^NY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE 1^____EAEIICJ IT AR.C; nFTUP PB'T'TTTnNPRR '^. l ur ^TBILASPl SIN6LE_BEN5H : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. ASNIHOTRI. _J. 'etitioner' Navin Chand Sai Paikara versus ReSBondents State of Chhattisqcrh and others PETITIOI Petitioner Rohit Kumar Rathiya varsus ftesopndents State of CSihattisgarh and others Ai rs Petitioner ftajnand Kumar Paikara •k- teSDondenrs Versus State of ChhattiSQar-h and others Mr. Ashwini Shukia counsel for the Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Deputy fiovernmsnt the respondents/Stote petitloners. (Passed on 19th &ay of &ecember, 2006) 1. Laarned counsel appear'ing for the petitioners as aiso for the Sj-ate/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of !aw involved in the present batch of writ petitions are squarely co^ered by the decision of this Court in the ca.se of Yash Municipal Cofpssration, Durg and anothef'. 2. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petitions are disposed of in tsrms of the decision of this Court in 1+ie matter of yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj {SufiTd), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitloners have acquired B.T.I. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 cnd 1-3-1 and further whether they have been paid two advonce increments or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order connected writ oetitions. placed on the record of the fe:L''<- Sd/- Satish KAgnihotri Judge 2 2006 (II) MPJ'R-CS 96