1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1918 OF 2010 Narsing s/o Sangram Gaikwad .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents Shri G.G.Suryawanshi, Advocate holding for Shri S.L.Namewar, Advocate for petitioner Shri K.J.Ghute Patil, A.G.P. for respondent No.1-State Shri VS.Panpatte, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ DATE : 15th March 2010 PER COURT : 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by which the petitioner prays for issuance of a writ directing the respondents to decide the application/representation of the petitioner, dated 2.7.2009 which is said to be pending. Learned Counsel for respondent No.2 states on instructions that if the said application/representation of the petitioner is pending, the respondent No.2 would decide the said application, in accordance with law, within period of three months from today. We accept the aforesaid statement as an undertaking to the Court. In the light of the said statement, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition. 2 2. We, therefore, permit the petitioner to withdraw this writ petition by accepting the statement made by learned Counsel on behalf of respondent No.2. Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ( S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.) ( P.V. HARDAS, J.) (vvr/1918.10wp)