IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No.9626 of 2011 . Date of Decision: 27.5.2011. Munish Kumar and another --Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate for the petitioners. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. B.S. Chahal, D.A.G., Punjab has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents. Petitioners have filed this petition seeking a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider and appoint them as Teaching Fellow against the seats reserved for physically handicapped category. It is admitted position that the controversy involved in this petitions is squarely covered by a judgement of this Court dated 12.1.2011 rendered in CWP No. 12886 of 2010 and other connected matter, wherein following observations have been made:- “ In view of the above, writ petitions are allowed. Respondents are directed to consider the petitioners for appointment against the unfilled handicapped vacancies on the basis of their merit in the selection. Let process of selection be completed within one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Copy of this order be served upon the competent authority.” CWP. No.9626 of 2011 -2- In view of the above, this petition is disposed of in terms of the aforementioned judgement. Petitioners shall be entitled to the similar relief as granted in the aforementioned writ petition. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 27.5.2011. lucky