IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36081 of 2008 CHANDRIKA HAZARA Versus STATE OF BIHAR - - - - 2. 27.8.2008 Heard. The earlier prayer of similar nature was dismissed by me in Cr. Misc. No. 25918 of 2007 by order dated 5.6.2007. The main ground for renewing the prayer for bail, as appears from paragraph 16 and other paragraphs of the petition, is that the case could not be disposed of in spite of a direction from this Court to the court concerned as also to the District and Sessions Judge. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the trial could not be concluded till today and that the petitioner is in custody since 7 years. The Court is really concerned about the plight of the petitioner for being in custody for 7 years but having perused the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge, what transpires is that the case is at the threshold of being disposed of on any day inasmuch as the trial has gone up to the conclusion of the arguments. It could be for 2 the parties to address their arguments and the court could be delivering the judgment. I set down a timeframe of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of the present order for the learned Magistrate to dispose of the trial. The parties to co-operate, else, the learned Magistrate shall peruse the record and deliver the judgment. The petition is dismissed. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)