^ 6^ 1 S.B. fService Matterl IN THE HIGH COURT OP CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISOARH) WRIT PETITION (S) N0. <^c) /2011 PETITIONER: Ganpat Rara Dewangan, son of Late Ramratan Dewangan, aged about 52 years, working as Upper Division Teacher Govt. Middle School Baijnath (Kasdole), Education District Baloda Bazar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. versus Respondents <0^ \^s^ ^N^ " \ ^-^' •"^"^' •('''' <(<*5 ..y"' ,»?>• 1; State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. District Education Officer, Baloda Bazar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. /. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA '*•. "•"(1 ' -^e X%HC-22 s^, a •zA .-^- -^' ff 311^1 ^T Id.-fi'* sn^i ^Hi^-afsfl •^Sf ^irqRTq, •B^ff'TS, flcti'My U.-P. 3I1^T ^ra^; ><11CTT *t)|ch ^)^:1 Z6\\•l^ 200 SII^I'^R'IWdf^I SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohlan Shnyastava, J. 10-01-2011 Shri C. Jayant K, Rao, cour|sel Shri Ajit Singh, Panel Lawy^r copy. Heard. Learned counsel appearirjg petitioner is entitled to benefit of t^ having passed B. T. I. examinatior) It is submitted that the issue involvfed jntegra and the same has been Court in the case of Asha Saxeh MPJR (SC) 59. It is further submitted that tt his order dated 06-02-2009 pass^d counsel for the petitioner further 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeg|l the judgment of the Supreme Coi| and the order passed by this directions have been issued for cc advance increrrents as per-circul^r of Madhya Pradesh, after verifioati( Learned counsel for the petitioner woutd also be considere<j »til<<Id'lfl-1 IWdf'? feTZ> <[»it$i< ^ siPgH SII^CT for the petitioner. for the State/respondents on advance drbws Coprt for the petitioner submits that the 'o advanoe increments on account of he before his appointment at his own cost. in the present petition is no longer res inally decided by the Hon'ble Supreme is vs. State ofM.P. & Ors., 2009 ffll) lis Court has also taken a similar view in in W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. Learned attention of this Court to orcfer dated No.124 of 2009, wherein relyjng upon irt in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) in another Writ Appeal No.87/2009, insideration of the case for grant of two r dated 21-09-1974 issued by the State )n of the facts pleaded in the petition. espondente submits that case of the on the same lines. [^^fel 11'"]-!!- XfcHC-22 ^ 's r "'41'iiid*), ^iily'i'c, I'liii'yy r^TT^T xra^? \^.\'-is]^'^]^\\ .^^.....v_/..............j...........,^ 200 111CTI Shllti te^ST' sn^i^ii lt;-li?b 31)^1 ?ti*ii<=n ^fl^T 311^1'5^'IW: ^lf?(T -Z-- In view of the statement mad of with a direction to the respondenl dated 21-09-1974 issued by the Sta <*i^f?l<fl-< tHlRTf 4 'fe1^ <Rflt<K ir aifigii 3ii^i ^ above, this petitioa is finally disposed authorities to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner for grant of t^o advance increments as per ciroular |e of Madhya Pradesh, after verification of the faots pleaded in the petitiorl within a period of eight weeks from today. Sd/- Manmdra Mohan Shrivastava Judge i'Tfi^if'rJ'