/- ^ IM THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W. P.(Sl. N0.<r< /2006 PETITIONER ./^ '0 ..••k.^.i .^^ y^/^%/ ^^w .yi;'^'"^oy ,.--7^-'<^>-'' <??'~^' y^t,/ '^y RESPONDENT ,<^T Rajendra Kumar Gupta S/o Shri Kanhaiya Lal Gupta Age about46 years, Village- Urla Post-AbhanpurTehsil -Abhanpur Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. StateGovtofChhattisgarh /^ Through Secretary Educational Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Drictt.-Raipur(C.G.) 2. District Education Officer -/ Raipur, District-Raipur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^' f*' '». \~> ^^i^ @ HE6H COURT OF CHHAniSSARH AT BELASPUR W. P. fS) Mo. 5635 of 2006 Petitwner : Meghanuth Yadw Versus Respondents : State 6ovt. of Chhuttisgarh &ano'rtier W. P.fSlNo. 5636 of 2006 Petitwner : Sqjadhur Prasad Satni Versus Respondents : StateSovt.ofChhattisgerhddno-lher W. P.fflNo. 5637 of 2006 Petitioner : (tamaahonltnr Supta Versus Re^pondents : Sfxrte 6ovt. of ChhaWW9arh A ano'ther W. P.fSlNo. 5638 of 2006 Petitionw : Tcekam Lal Sinha Vsrsus Re^pondents : StateSovt.ofChhattiagarhAano'thcr W. P./SiNo. 5639 of 2006 Ptetitioner : Smt. Sunita Pnrf Versus RMpondmts : Sta*c6ovt.<»fChhattisgarhAano1her W. P.ffflNo. 5640 of 2006 PetM'ioner : Mohbaob Khnn Quruishi Veraus Respondents : Statefiovt.ofChhatMagnrhAdnolher W.P.rfflNo.S641of2006 Petjtioner : Smt. Jageawnri Bhagel Weraus Respondcnts : StutB 6avt. of Chhul twfarii A anulhcr W. P. fft No. S642 of Z006 Petitkmer : Tutendru Kumor TnmrJ Vcrsus ReapondBnts : S*Brt»6ovt.ofChhn*tisgdrhdano1h W.P.fS)No.S643of2006 Ptetitioner : Rnmavtur yadatin WBMUS Rwpondents : Stnte 6ovt. of ChhattKgarh A ano'ther^ Retitioner Reapondents Retitioner Respondents Pktitioner Respondents Pktitk>ner RBSpondents Petitioner fi»<nnnrl»jr Petitioner Reapondents Petitwner Respondcnls Petitioner Reapondents Petitioner RffffBwidcnls W.P. fSi No. S644 of 2006 : AnujRamSnhu Verau : Stute6ovt.cf ChhattiagurhAano'thcr W. P.fSiNo. 5646 of 2006 : tojundro Kunwr fiupta Vcrsus : Starte 6uvt. of ChhatMs9arh A ono'thcr W. P.fSlNo. 5647 of 2006 : SharudTiwnri Versus : StafSovt.ofChhattisgarhAono'rtier W.P.fSllNo. 5648 of 2006 : AAahmdFaPrasndShukki Veraus : StutBfiovt.ofChhutttogarhAomrthu- W. P.faNo. 5673 of 2006 : fiunbheoahan Sahu Versus Stute 6<wt. of Chhattiagorh Aaiwrtw W. P.f5lNo. 5674 of 2006 : Smt. Jaya Tiwari Veraus : Statefioyl'.ofChhaMiagorhdano-ther W.P.ffflNo. 5675 ef 2006 : Tuto Rnm Chandnknr Versus State 6ovt. of Chhattiagarh Aaiwther W. P.fSiNo. 5676 of 2006 : Rameah Kumar Verma Verais : State6ovt.cf OihattisgnrhAano'ther And W.P.f5»No.5677ofa)06 Vcrais OhunanyRatel Stute 6»wt.»fChhattiagarh^Aioihei^ Singto Bmch: Hon'ble ttr. Justice Satiak K. AgnitNrtri. Shri Ajay Shrivustam, Advocate for the Petlrioners. 5uit. Anju Ahuja, &y. 6ovt. Adwcate for 1fw reapondcnts/Stut*. ORDER (26th October. 2006) 1. Lcamed counael appenring for the petitioners aibroits Iha* while «»orkin9 us Assistant TeachersAJpper Owision TeachersAAehirers, •the peKtioners hmc gene on truinirg to iniprove Iheir quaUfications on •their awn expcnaea and acquired B. Ed7B.TJ Ewniinotion Certificate. The preaent writ petitions, being WP^ Nos. 5635/2006, 5636/2006, 5637/2006. 5638/2006. 9639/2006. 5640/2006. 564V2006, 5642/2006,5643/2006, 5644/2006, 5646/2006. 5647/3X)6. 5648/2006, 5673/2006,5674/2006, 56TO/2006. 5676/2006 and 5677/2006 inwlve aintikir fncta and cwiinwn question of tawi. Thus, •these petitions ore being diaposed of by •this conunon'order. According to learned counael for Ihe petrMonws, the petitjonera are entitted *o Iwo aidvnnoB ncrwnuThi in view of •the decision of •this Court in •the caae of yaahwant Kiumar Bharudwnj Vs. Afainicipal Corporution, Durg and anolher {2006 OCE) MPJR-C6 96}. This Court h -the caae of Yaahwant Kiumor Bharodunj Vs. Municipal Corporution, Durg ond awthm' 4 (S^>ra), eamK to •the conclusion •that Ihe teachm-s. who hud obtained B.Ed./B.TJ. Examination CBrMfiarte on his own oqwises.dre covered by •Ihe drcular doted 24.12.98 isaued by Kie State Swemment of A^odhya Pradeah. 4. Leomed counsel for Ihe petitwncra furlher aubmits •that •the faets and <|uestion of law involved in •rtw pnsent eaass arc squardy cwered by decision of Ihis Court' in 1he cnae of yaahtinn* Kumur Bhandwuy Vs. AAundpal Corponriion. Durg and ano-ther (5upra), to wihich teamed «»uMelcppuring fw 1hc reapondBnts fourly concedes and agrees iwth the ayerment nwde by lumed counsel oppeering for Ihe p»titioners. 5. Accordingly, •the writ petitio»ware allowied in tBrms of 1h» order passed in •the case of yaahiinnt ICunur Bhandw«y Vs. AAunicipal Corponrtion, tSurg and another (SupnQ, aibjact t» verification of 1he fact aa to ihe-rtier •rt—petitioneM haw acquBwl B. Ed7B.TJ. Ewuninutwn Cwtificate on their own expenaea er not. No order as to casts. 6. A copy of 1his onter be plund on record of olhm' connBctcd NrM- petitwns. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge iBablu