IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 5TH JANUARY 2009 / 15TH POUSHA 1930 RP.No. 1376 of 2008(B) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.33615/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER/PETITIONER ------------------------------------------- SADANANDAN.V., S/O.VELU, AGED 40 YEARS, VAZHATHODIYIL HOUSE, NALUCENT COLONY, COLONY LANE, MALAMALKAVU POST, TRITHALA, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PALAKKAD 3. THE GEOLOGIST, MINING AND GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT, PALAKKAD 4. THE ANAKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 5. SATHYANANDAN, S/O.LATE MADHAVAN, PAROL VEEDU, ANAKKARA POST, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DIST. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MATHEW VADAKKEL THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- R.P.1376/2008 in W.P.(C).33615/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 5th day of January, 2009 ORDER Petitioner has filed the Review Petition on the ground that though I relegated him to an alternate remedy under the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, I had omitted to take note of prayer No.(ii) made in the writ petition. It is clarified that the judgment dated 18.11.2008 has dealt with only the challenge against Ext.P10 order. It is now affirmed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that an appeal has already been filed against Ext.P2 as Annexure-A2. Other aspects have not been dealt with in the judgment. It is open to the petitioner to prosecute further steps, against the contesting respondents, if there is unauthorized quarrying. Subject to the above clarification, Review Petition is disposed of. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs