IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 26851 of 2008 Between: Sri Inti Yesu Babu S/. Elia, Hindu R/o. Prodduvaka Gram Panchayat Mudinepalli Mandal, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Krishna District Machilipatnam. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer Gudivada, Krishna District 3 District Panchayat Officer, Machilipatnam Krishna District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in conducting "Motion of No-Confidence" against the Petitioner -UPa Sarpanch without following the procedure contemplated under the Act as well as Rules is arbitrary illegal, un-constitutional and against to the provisions of A.P. Panchayat Raj Act 1994 and the rules framed there under and consequently stop the proceeding in pursuance of the notice dt. 11-11-2008 issued in Form -IV by the 2nd respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed to declare the action of the respondents in conducting ‘Motion of Confidence’ against the petitioner, a Upa Sarpanch without following the procedure contemplated under the Act and the Rules as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and against the provisions of the A.P.Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 and the rules framed thereunder. Today, when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. N.V.RAMANA,J Dt.9.6.2009 msv