1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. C.A.W.NO. 1440/2011 IN W.P.NO. 2087/2010. Shri Madhukar Chokha Kakde and another. -VERSUS- Registrar Co-op. Societies, Buldhana and others. _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : SEPTEMBER 21, 2011. Heard Shri P.B. Patil, learned Counsel for petitioners, learned A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 to 3 and Shri K.B. Ambilwade, learned Counsel for respondent no.31. Short contention of Shri Patil, learned Counsel for petitioner is in 2007 elections have been conducted and tenure of that body is to expire in 2012, in this situation there was no scope for holding any election in 2010. 2 Shri Ambilwade, learned Counsel for respondent has only contended that because the election officer was appointed, he has conducted the election in 2010 and new body has been elected. Question therefore, is, when elections conducted in 2007 were not in dispute, why need to hold fresh election in 2010 arose ? Shri Ambilwade, learned counsel is seeking time till December, 2011 to answer this question. List the matter on 13.12.2011. Parties to note that Court may dispose of the Writ Petition on that date if it is otherwise convenient to the Court. Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE Rgd