A IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1469 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra .. Applicants. vs. Arun Shankarrao Desai & Anr. .. Respondents. Mr.D.P.Adsule, A.P.P.for the State. Mr.P.D.Salvi for Respondents. CORAM : A.R. JOSHI,J. DATE : 17th July,2009. P.C.:- It is the leave petition to file an appeal against the acquittal of Respondent accused in the matter of offence punishable under section 7(1)(d) of Protection of Civil Rights Act and section 3(1)(x) of Scheduled Caste and Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. 2. Perused the reasoning given by the Trial Court. Also perused the documents annexed to the application. It is admitted position that the incident of alleged utterances of words regarding the caste of the complainant, occurred in the cabin of the accused the Manager of the Bank. Allegedly, in the said cabin complainant accompanied by his son, was censored by the accused persons, official of the bank regarding the repayment of loan. At that juncture, allegedly certain words were uttered mentioning the caste of the complainant and asking him when he would pay the loan. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the accused that the son of the complainant did not support the evidence of his father on the aspect as to utterances of words by the accused. Admittedly, there was no any third person in the cabin and even the door of the cabin was closed. These circumstance weighed much with the trial Court while arriving at the failure of the prosecution to establish the ingredients for the offences charged. 4. In the above situation, in the opinion of this Court, there is nothing to interfere with the impugned Judgment and order in the appeal before this Court and as such present leave petition is dismissed and accordingly disposed of. (A.R. JOSHI,J.)