wWW‘W/“S wing THE STATE mxnqIsTRATIVE QRIBUmL, BENCH JABAL RIGEIAL -AP?LI.CATIDN N .gL 1994. Cg. Wu» Qy x95 ”: Chancirabhan Pgteld 3/0 aged years R/ Jag§alpur, Bastar. APPL ICAW -‘krsus _ mwpmcAms : 1. stategfadhya Pradesh'through $ecretary Adim Jati, Harijan Avam Pichda wrg v Kalyan Vihhag, Bhoyal, zxss istant‘ ‘Commiss‘icner, Ai ivasi Vikas, Jagdalpur. 3, Erincipal‘ mrnya miksha Parisar, Jagdalpu 4 Coll ecto r, m. skit . Bastar, Jagdalpur , Ba star; A?PLECATION U/s 9 OF THE AWEINISI‘RATIVE‘ TRIBUAM$ MT, 1985 DETAESOF THE APPLICATIG 2. WR O i f o m r ‘ . . N: ’ W HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRW PETfTiON §S§ NO.§_31 CF 2035 PETmONER Chandrabhan Patai @aaw Versu$ RESPGNDENTS same oi Madhya pyacgesh a athers S§ngie Bench : Hon’bie Shré Satish K. Agni'netri, J. Present :- None for the petitioner. Ms $uniia JaEn, PL f0! the State. DRDER §GRAL) (Passed on this 16m day bf $eptember, 2099) The matter is caiied fer hearing twice. Gr: bow occasions! nene appears nor is any {ewesentation made or: behah‘ of the petmoner. The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. 2) in View of the above, the wrEt peiition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Regisiry is directed {o semi a com: of 'ihie order to ihe petitioner forthwith. ” Satish K. Agnihotri ‘ Judge Gowri r i ‘