: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3359 OF 2007 Ravindra S. Jadhav ....Petitioner V/s. Union of India and others ....Respondents Mr.Padmakar Kharat for the Petitioner. Mr.Kiran Khanpile for the Respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.M. SAVANT, JJ. DATED : 18TH JUNE, 2007. P.C. : 1. We have heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner. The Petitioner had earlier approached the Tribunal. That application was rejected by an order dated 22.10.2003. Liberty was however given to make a representation. That representation was made and the same has been rejected by the Respondents. The Petitioner once again approached the Tribunal, the Tribunal by the impugned order dated 15.9.2006 considered the case of the Petitioner as also its earlier finding. The Tribunal noted that on merits, the case has been disposed of by its earlier order and only liberty was given to the Petitioner to make a representation. That representation had been considered and rejected. : 2 : 2. In our view, considering that the Petitioner’s case had originally been rejected and the Respondents have refused to reconsider the Petitioner’s case and the Petitioner had only served from 2.6.1994 to 30.11.1994 and thereafter from 1.6.1997 to 30.11.1997, no case made out for interference. The impugned order also does not suffer from any error apparent on the face of the record. No interference is called for. Hence the Petition is rejected. (R.M. SAVANT, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)