IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.6429 of 2007 Between: Surapaneni Venkata Narasamma. … Petitioner And The State of A.P., rep. By its public Prosecutor and another … Respondents This Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No. 6429 OF 2007 ORDER:- This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to quash the orders of IV Additional District & Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam in Criminal Revision Petition No.27 of 2007, dated 16.08.2007, whereby the revision filed by the petitioner against the orders of II Metropolitan Magistrate for Railways, Visakhapatnam in dismissing Crl.M.P.No.64 of 2007 in C.C.No.124 of 2004 for sending the suit promissory note Ex.P6 to he handwriting expert, has been dismissed. It is not disputed that for due discharge of the debt covered by Ex.P6 promissory note Ex.P1 cheque is issued and the signature on it is admitted. Once the signature on Ex.P1 is admitted, necessary presumption has to be drawn under Section 118 of the N.I.Act that every negotiable instrument was made or drawn for consideration. Further, the trial court found that the handwritings and signatures of the petitioner in the statements recorded under Sections 251 and 313 Cr.P.C., are at variance and disguising and that the specimen signatures of the petitioner if taken in the open court are not contemporaneous and will be of disguising style. Therefore, it is not necessary for sending the suit promissory note to the handwriting expert and accordingly dismissed the petition. The said order has been confirmed by the revisional court. No infirmity is discernable with the order passed by the courts below. The Criminal Petition is dismissed. __________________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J 22nd October 2010 lmv