MC 1767/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C. UPADHYAY This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, praying for condonation of delay of 143 days in filing the accompanying appeal. Heard Mr. A. Ganguly, learned counsel for the applicant-appellant, and Mr. A. Ph ukan, learned counsel for the respondent-Insurance Company. Learned counsel for the applicant-appellant has submitted that the applicant-app ellant suffered serious injuries in the accident and had to undergo a nephrectom y (removal of one kidney) and splenectomy (removal of spleen) and spent lakhs of rupees for his treatment. The applicant has explained the reasons in preferring the connected appeal in paragraphs 4,5,6 and 7 of the instant application. The respondent-Insurance Company has filed written objection to the prayer for c ondonation of delay. I have heard the learned counsel for the respondent on the objection raised by h im. On careful consideration of the matter in its entirety, I find that there are co gent and sufficient reasons for condoning the delay of 143 days in preferring th e connected appeal. Accordingly, the prayer for condonation of delay of 143 days in preferring the c onnected appeal is hereby condoned. Misc. application stands disposed.