Q SINGLE BENCH CPI \ m / a / C 2 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (s) No. 1160 *6 / 2006 PETITIONER: m. Yogita Patil,(’ M W/o Late Shri Chandan Singh Patil, Aged about 25 years, R/o Hikmipara, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh w°§ VERsus RESPONDENTS: 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Law, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) 2. The District and Sessions Judgel’ Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar, (C.G.) 3. The Registrar General,/ High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur (C.G.) (‘ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUENCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBTION, CERTIORARLAND ANY OTHER WRITS, DIRECTIONS OR ORDERS. r ‘ I of 3D days from today. With the dkection aforesaid, thé CertMed copy as per ru‘es‘ a petition stands disposed of. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge l l P.T.O. XI—HC-78 3aW, J f mW ...‘/r3‘.0/.\./§;.'1F3 7.6 .9 gm; 200 m mW mm (W) mW § fgfrW 103.20% \u Shri Alok Pandey, Advocate fo; the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dye G‘A‘ for the State on advance copyi Heard‘ a! ‘ The main grievance of the peti‘ ioner in this petition is that her application for compassionate appointment is not being processed and decided by respondent No.2 Le. the District & Sessions Judge Bastar. The case of the petitioner is trat she is widow of Late Shri Chandan Singh Patii who was working as Assistant Accountant (Grade iii) in the office of the District & Sessions Judge, Jagdaipur, District Bastar and died in harness on 20.6.2003 leaving behind the petitioner and one daughter. Death certificate is Annexure P4. The petitioner’s husband was the only earning member in the family and now there is no source of income to fulfill the requirements of the family, therefore, the petitioner had made an application f0' compassionate appointment. The petitioner had completed all the formalities through proper procedure and fulfilled all the requisite norms by submitting certificates, as demanded by the authorities, but till date the petitioner’s application for compassionate appointment is not being decided, Learned counsel for the peti‘ ioner submitted that in the circumstances, limited prayer is made that respondent No.2 be directed to decide the application of the petitioner for compassionate appoi 1tment in accordance with law. The prayer made by learned c unsel for the petitioner appears to be just, fair and reasonable, therefore, responden No.2 is directed to decide the application of the petitioner for compassionate appoi tment in accordance with law within a period