IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9563 of 2011 Bibi Aklimun Nisha & Anr Versus Md.Asad & Ors ---------------------------------- 11. 25.10.2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. By the impugned order dated 22.08.2006 passed by Sub Judge IInd Munger in Title Suit No.83 of 2000 the application filed by the intervener-respondents under Order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C. has been allowed by the Court below finding that their presence is necessary for just decision of the suit as they have got interest in the suit property. The learned counsel for the petitioner only submit that Bibi Abedunnisha has already gifted the property and, therefore, there is no question of inheriting the property by the petitioner arises. In my opinion, so far this question is concerned that can be decided in presence of the interveners only. In view of the finding recorded by the Court below that the interveners have got interest in the property and that they are necessary party because it s a partition suit. In my view, the impugned order cannot be interfered with in supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. Sanjeev/- (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)