IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2009 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 36121 of 2009(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.C.KURIAKOSE, S/O.CHACKO, AGED 75 YEARS, KIZHAKKAYIL HOUSE, MUTTUKKADU, BISON VALLEY, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.PHILIP T.VARGHESE SRI.THOMAS T.VARGHESE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, IDUKKI. 2. THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, IDUKKI. 3. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDHUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 4. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ELECTRICAL SECTION,CHITHIRAPURAM, IDUKKI DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B FOR R3,4 GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.C. SANTHOSH KUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 36121 of 2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 21st December, 2009. J U D G M E N T The learned standing counsel for the respondents hands over to me a copy of the order of the Additional District Magistrate, permitting the 4th respondent to draw the line as proposed. The petitioner filed this writ petition on the premise that no order has been passed by the District Magistrate. Now that the District Magistrate has passed an order, without challenging that order, the petitioner cannot challenge the drawing of the lines. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the order now passed by the District Magistrate. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.