IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 16TH AUGUST 2011 / 25TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 22173 of 2011(V) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- MOHAN SANKAR V.N., VAIKKATTIL HOUSE, VADANAPPALLY AMSOM DESOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TRICHUR- 680 001. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR – 680 702. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VADANAPPALLY, TRICHUR – 680 614. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REP; BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695 001. 5. SREE NARAYANA PARAMAHAMSA SAMAJAM, VADANAPPALLY, ENGANDIYUR, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, REP; BY ITS SECRETARY SRI. C.V. SATHYAPALAN, S/O. VELAYUDHAN, CHERAYATH HOUSE, GANESAMANGALAM, VADANAPPALLY.P.O- 680 614. R1 TO R4 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/08/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.22173/2011-V: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DTD. 09/06/2009. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE MANAGER, SOUTH MALABAR GRAMIN BANK TO THE PETITIONER DTD. 20/12/2010. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE MANAGER, SOUTH MALABAR GRAMIN BANK TO THE PETITIONER DTD. 14/03/2011. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.2. DTD. 29/03/2011. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P(C).10545/11 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE ORDER IN R.P.380/11 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. EXT.P.7: COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE R.2. DTD. 01/08/2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. Prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).22173/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 16th day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioner claims to be the owner of 1.29 acres of land in R.S.No.207/11 of Vadanappally Village. It is stated that he also owns another plot of 45 cents comprised in R.S.No.207/12 of the same Village. 2. Non acceptance of the tax is complained of in this writ petition and finally Tahsildar has passed Ext.P7 order justifying his stand. It is challenging Ext.P7 order, and seeking consequential directions for the acceptance of the tax, the writ petition is filed. 3. A reading of Ext.P7 discloses that O.S.No.804/03 involving a dispute of title of the property in question is pending before the Sub Court, Thrissur and it was therefore, the tax was not accepted. Facts being as above, I do not think that this Court will be justified in coming to the rescue of the petitioner at least at this stage. Writ petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs