IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.11741 of 2009 ***** Ashok Baitha, S/o Mahanth Baitha, resident of village- Hathini, P.S.-Nokha, Distt.-Rohtas. …. …. Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar …. …. Opposite party ----------- 2. 7.7.2009. Heard learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner is in custody since 16.6.2008 in relation to Nokha P.S. Case No.15/2008 under several substantive sections including 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Contention of the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner is that he has not been named in the F.I.R. nor in the informatory petition filed by the informant, it is only on the hearsay statement made before the police many months later that the petitioner has been made an accused and came to be arrested and remanded in the case. His contention is that there is no cogent evidence to link the petitioner and he is willing to cooperate in the trial of the case, if he is enlarged on bail. In view of the above, let the petitioner, namely, Ashok Baitha, be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties in the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas in connection with Nokha P.S. Case No.15/08 corresponding to Tr. No.6/09 with a direction that he shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court and shall cooperate in trial. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)