IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23061 of 2011 Ram Kripal Ojha, son of Gauri Shankar Ojha, resident of village Sadha Damber, Police station Motipur, District-Muzaffarpur Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Pushpa Devi, daughter of Uday Nath Pathak, wife of Ram Kripal Ojha, resident of village Sadhadamber Ojha, Ojha Tola, police station Motipur, District Muzaffarpur, presently resides at Dariya Chapra, Pathak Tola, police station Motipur, District Muzaffarpur. Opposite Parties. ----------- 2. 01.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case no. 1267 of 2009 (Trial No. 2131 of 2010) for the offence under Sections 498(A), 420 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the Court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (West), Muzaffarpur. Petitioner is named accused in this case being husband of the complainant with allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. and also marrying with him of concealment of earlier marriage and the decreed of divorce. Submission is that it is the complainant who has deserted the petitioner under compelling circumstances one matrimonial suit no. 66 of 2009 under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act has been filed seeking dissolution of marriage 2 and decree of divorce etc. still the petitioner intends to resume and continue matrimonial relationship with the complainant who is his own and only wife to further strengthen the intention and offer is to pay of Rs. 1,000/- per month by way of interim maintenance subject to any order of the competent Court on the point. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the petitioner, namely, be enlarged on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate,(West), Muzaffarpur in connection with Complaint Case No.1267 of 2009, subject to condition under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure of two consecutive dates, without reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Kamlesh (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)