IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9797 of 2010 1. ALGU BHAGAT SON OF RAJENDRA BHAGAT 2. BABITA DEVI @ SABITA DEVI W/O ALGU BHAGAT 3. MADHURI DEVI W/O SUGREEV BHAGAT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.3.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. On 25.6.2007 the husband of the alleged victim filed a complaint that his wife had been kidnapped by certain accused persons. Three days later the father of the alleged victim instituted a complaint that in fact it is her husband, her sons and daughter-in- law who had caused disappearance of the victim, his daughter, then for the same occurrence he filed the present first information report only raising a suspicion against the family members of the alleged victim. In view of the relationship between the parties, who happen to be the son and the daughters-in-law of the victim and against whom apart from suspicion there is no cogent material, let the petitioners above named, who are in custody since 16.2.2010, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Gopalganj in Bhorey P.S.case No.117 of 2007, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving - 2 - genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners and (ii) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )