q / g ? HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Wrii Petition No.2699 of 2006 1. Krishna Dutta Tiwari, Sio Late Shri Virat Dutt Tiwari, aged about 50 years, occupation practicing advocate. 2. Arun Kumar Tiwari, Sic Late Jivrakhan Prasad Tiwari, aged about 59 years, Occupation Patei, Mangia. (32 Petitioners DL S. N. Thawait Sic Bodanna! Thawait, aged about 52 years, cccupation doctor. Ashish Murarka, Sio Mahesh Murarka, aged 24 years, occupation businessman. 5. Murari La! Gupta, S/o Late Durua Prasad Gupta aged abeut 54 years, Eccupation businessman. 6. Kaushal Kumari Singh, Wlo Ramshairan Singh Thakur, aged about 50 years, occupation housewife. 7. Kama! Kumar Soni. Sio Jawahar Lai Soni, aged 28 years, occupation businessman. U, Y”, Ali resident of Viiiage Mangia, Gram Panchayat Mangia, Tahsii and District Biiaspur (CG) Versus Rescondents 1) The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Locai Self Government, Raipur, D.K.S. Building, Raipur (CG) 2) Nagar 'Nigam, Bilaspur, through its Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Biiaspur (CG) 3) Sub Divisionai omcerlLand Acquisition Officew Prescribed authority under the Land Acquisition Act, Biiaspur, Tahsil and District Biiaspur (CG) 4) The Executive Engineer, Division No.1, Nagar Nigam, Biiaspur, Tahsii and District Biiaspur (CG) 5) The Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Mangla, Tahsii and District Bilaspur (CG) (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) SB: Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: $mt. Rent! Kechar, counse! for the petitioners. $hri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents \ No.1 & 3. Shri A. S. Kachhawaha, counsei for respondents No.2 & 4. GRAL ORDER (Passed on this s‘h day cf Aprii, 2009) At the very outset, ieamed counsel appearing for respondents No.2 & 4 submits that the foilowing pet§tion schedule properties of the petitioners are not required for any purposes by the Municipai Corporation, Biiaspur. Thus, the apprehension of the petitioners that the petition scheduie ianci and house constructed thereon shall be demoiished is unfounded :- Land ad-measuring 1208 Sq. Ft. situated in Khasra No.1147/5 as well as in Khasra No.1147/7 Patwari Halka No.21 belonging to petitioner No.1. Built up house and open pieces of land Khasra No.1152 ad-measuring 0.8 dismal, Khasra No.1157 area 0.33 dismal and Khasra No.1156 Patwari Haika No.21 belonging to petitioner No.2. Land ad-measuring 0.07 dismal situated in Khasra No.1148/3, 9.03 dismal and 1150/3 0.04 dismal (Total 0.07 dismal) Patwari Haika No.2i beionging to petitioner No.3. o Land ad-measuring 525 Sq. Ft. situated in Khasra No.968/3 and 968I2(c) Patwari Halka No.21 belonging to petitioner No.4. Land ad—measuring 0.02 dismal situated in Khasra No.1033/1 PatWari Haika No.21 belonging to petitioner No.5. Land ad-measuring 221 Sq. Ft. and 1160 Sq. Ft. situated in Khasra No.1033/5 and Khasra No.1101/8 Patwari Halka No.21 belonging to petitioners No.6 & 7. Shri Kachhawaha, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 & 4, further submits that at present there is no proposal and if in future, some scheme/proposal is made, due notice shall b'e given in accordance with law. ve‘ I in View of the foregoing statement made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents No.2 & 4, according to learned counsel for the petitioners, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 2) 3) Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. i Sdl— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Tumane