/ uTMl? B 1>1 ^ \ •IN EiB HIGH OOU'RT OF aiHATTISGAHI AT BILASPUR PS'ISSXONBR ^ 1^^-/ ^'^'[^' >^'"A^-"" ^ 'y^ .'^- ^ RgSPONDENTS VBRSUS s- ^.l^ '^:e>a?' G^*^" W.P. No. L1^10 /20Q4 j- ^nt» LaXshmi ,Bagb@l widow o£ lat.e ^ 'A^- ^^~ " • Gajendr^ Singh Baghel^ aged about 45 years^ A<N»M# Distriat Hoapi.tal^ Kaigarh (c»G») R/o," Raig^rh^ Distt, Baigarh (C^G^Y. l^ Sfate of CShhattisgarh Shrough-}- Seoretory Kealth.and Pamily Welfare Depa^'toen^ D<.K»S< Bhavan^ Raipur (02<i) <» 2. Chief Hedioal & Health Officer, .Raigarh (C,G«). 3 <» Szip erintendent / ©ivilSurgeon & Main Hospi-tal R^igarh^ Distt,. Raigarh .(<33»5 PETITIOKI ONDER ARTICliB 226/227 OP OONSTITUEEON OF INQIA, ^n^i'^T ^ich 'OTT 3?H^T ^5'HW --^^- NTN<!fll <5ft*lieii ^"aET ^|q|<nq, ^Ti1<-|^(o, [®l<rlj[y^< _.......^..f?.....h.l.'...O.J.Q.•^200 ^ri^T XR^ (^qi^^r) I^fTW^feT3H^T petitio^er shle 01-02-2005 Shri J.K. Shastri, learned ^ Shri Sandeep Dubey, Heard on admission. The contention of learnel though the petitioner has been (Annexure-P/1) from her piace order of transfer has been rec^ submits that in fact the 18-7-2003 (Annexure-P/3) but filing on application dated 14-8- suffering from a disease in whicl^ not uniformally formed in the petitioner wants to serve at Raig^i and having the fadlities of distri the petitioner is sent to Lailungal ond in case of emergency she Ldlunga. It is settled principle of service and nobody con claim for when he/she is working on a cbl^fd^l^ ^i*i<riT ^f f^l<) <r3i^« ^ 3tR?H 3TI^[ ounsel for the petitioner. learn^d Panel Lawyer for the State. counsel for the petifioner is that -elieved by order dated 23-10-2004 oflposting i.e. Rd9<3irh to Lailunga but no uved by the petitioner. He further was promoted vide order dated hos denied to avai! the promotion by -p003 (Annexure-P/4) because 3he is the Red Biood Corpuscles (RBC) are He also 3ubmits that in fact the )c|rh because Raigarh is a district place i^t hospital. He also submits that if it may adversely affect her health c4nnot get immediate medical help at la^v thot the transfer is on incidence of tetdnin9 him/her at a particulQr place tran^feroble post, however, the per^onat botly GRPRJ—FS/350—12/2000—50,000. T -Y ^ V. ^TN^Tt »»<1^1) 's^ ^ww^, ^^\w\^, f®i<ni^^< ..VJf......^i.°iQ-^200 ^TT^r XRR? (^tp^?) 3???^l^T^ri^ 'cCT^H^i^Hr^ ^- ffown ^fTW^ftTT 3TT^T ^ difficulties of an employee are to employer in appropriate cases. HQvin9 considered the facts a^i material on record, in the opinion o1 would be served if a direction is di detoiled representation before th| respondents alon9with Q copy of thi relating to the disease of the petitio^ier of this order dnd on such represen^ation authority shall decide the same by Q law as early as possible preferably w| the date of filing of the representati^r With the oforesaid observatl disposed of. Consequently, M.W.P.No.4661/1 6/05 also stand disposed of. Parties are entitled for certit <=hl^id<4l^ ^IW^ff ^f 1^t '^n^R ^ 3tRPT 3?IT^[ „ be seen ond considered by the id circumstances of the case and this Court, the ends of justice iven to the petitioner to file a ^ competent authority of the order and medical certificates within 10 days from the date being filed, the competent leasoned order in accordance with thin a period of one month from |n. ons, the petition stands finally 104, I.A.No.8713/04, 9546/04 <& ied copy of this order^ Sd/- SunilKumarSinha Judge GRPRJ—FS/350—12/2000—50,000. _< ^