THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL Nos. 248 of 2009, 262 of 2009, 264 of 2009 AND W.A.M.P.No. 487 of 2009 IN W.A.No.802 of 2009 AND W.A.No.802 of 2009 COMMON ORDER: (Per T. Meena Kumari, J) W.A.M.P.No. 487 of 2009 Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner- appellant, the delay is condoned. W.A.Nos. 248 of 2009, 262 of 2009, 264 of 2009 AND W.A.(SR) No. 14333 of 2009 All the Writ Appeals are filed against the orders passed by the learned Single Judge in different Miscellaneous Petitions. But, however, the question whether the respondent-appellate authority has the power to seize the vehicles for contravention of the provisions under Sections 3,4, 39, 66(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act has to be decided in the main Writ Petitions itself. Under these circumstances, we are of the opinion that it would suffice if the main Writ Petitions are posted for final hearing for disposal of the matters according to law. In the result, W.A.M.P.No. 248 of 2009 is ordered and all the writ appeals are dismissed and all the Writ Petitions shall be listed before the learned Single Judge after Summer Vacation, 2009 for Final Hearing in the top of the list. _______________________ T. MEENA KUMARI, J _______________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 17.3.2009