IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.854 of 2011 Date of Decision : January 18, 2011. Fruit and Vegetables Commission Agents Union .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Hitesh Kaplesh, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner-association is aggrieved by the proposed construction of pack-house/cold storage in the vegetable and fruits market at Phagwara. According to the petitioner-association, the pack-house is likely to be constructed within the covered plate-form which is being used by its members for their day to day business activities. It is also averred that there is sufficient land available adjoining to the covered pakka plate- form where the proposed pack-house can be easily constructed. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner-association at some length, I am of the considered view that such like issues do not fall within the ambit of judicial review as it is for the authorities to take an appropriate decision in the public interest. The best course for the C.W.P.No .854 of 2011 2 petitioner-association would be to make a self-explanatory representation to the respondent-authorities who, in turn, are directed to consider the same objectively within a period of three months from the date of receiving such representation. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. January 18, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE