1 D. B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO.1082/99 SURENDRA KUMAR SAHARAN V. RSRTC & OTHERS. DATE OF ORDER ::: 21-04-2008 HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. NARAYAN ROY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI Mr. P.S.Chundawat, for Appellant (s). Mr. P.K.Lohra, for Respondents. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the order impugned. The learned Single Judge of this Court disposed of the writ application in terms of the order passed by it earlier in Writ Petition No.854/96, duly affirmed by the Division Bench in Appeal No.887/98. On appreciation of submissions of the counsel for the parties and pleading of the parties, it appears to us that the question involved in the writ application was similar to that of Writ Petition No.854/96, in the case at hand, the employment of the appellant was by virtue of the contract, whereas in the earlier case also, it was the same. The award passed by the Labour Court was under-challenge in the earlier case also and the same is position here also. The learned Single 2 Judge decided earlier writ application and disposed of the present writ application as well in the same term. Earlier order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.854/96 has been produced before us for perusal. It appears to us that the facts are identical and the issues involved are also identical. This being the situation, the learned Single Judge was perfectly justified in disposing of the writ application in terms of the order passed by it as referred to above. We, therefore, find no merit in this appeal. The appeal is dismissed. (M. N. BHANDARI), J. (NARAYAN ROY), C. J. scd