IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No. 38239 of 2010 SHANTI DEVI, W/o late Shiv Nandan Thakur Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 27.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. It appears some mistake either by inadvertence or by misconception, order dated 01.02.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 46472 of 2009 is not justified for its result. Observations is to the effect that for the differences in between the wife and husband, petitioners of that case were apprehending their arrest while a lady, wife of the petitioner’s brother was done to death. So, cancellation of bail is proper remedy for which notice be issued to the petitioners in Cr. Misc. No. 46472 of 2009 never can be made ground for allowing bail to the petitioner who has been refused earlier by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 10406 of 2010. Earlier defence was made about burning an accident of burst of stove but no such stove is seized in course of investigation. Accordingly, petitioner’s prayer for anticipatory bail is again rejected. Office is directed to issue notice to the petitioners of Cr. Misc. No. 46472 of 2009 for cancellation of anticipatory bail. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)