1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Review Petition No.12/2009 In S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 490/1998 (Jamal Versus Abdul Rahman & Others) Date of Order :: 18th May, 2009 PRESENT HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Shri Arvind Sharma for the petitioner BY THE COURT: The petitioner has preferred this review petition to review the order dated 2nd March, 2006 passed by this Court in S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 490/1998. There is a delay of 30 days in filing the review petition, hence an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has also been filed for condonation of delay. 2. The appellant in para 2 of the application has explained the delay by contending that he was not having the knowledge about passing of the order dated 2nd March, 2006 as he could not receive the information from his counsel. However, he has not filed any affidavit of his counsel to the effect that for whatever reason he could not inform the appellant about decision of the second appeal. 2 In these circumstances, I find that the delay in filing the review petition has not been explained satisfactorily and the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act deserves to be dismissed. 3. Apart-from above, I have also examined the order dated 2nd March, 2006 and I do not find any error or illegality in the said order, so as to review the same. Hence, the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act stands dismissed. Consequently, the review petition also stands dismissed being barred by limitation as well as on merits also. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN), J. DK