© HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P. (81 No.5222/2007 PETITIONER Fakin-am Sahu, S/o Late SIm Bahorik Sahu, aged about 60 years, r/o viUage Haokash, Post Dahi, Tahsil & Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) Versus RESPONDBNTS 1. State of Chliattisgarh, Through: The Secretaiy, Water Resources Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Mahaaadi Water Maaagement, Sub-Division No.8, Gurur, Distnct Durg (C.G) 3. The Executive Bngiaeer, Water Manageinent Division, Rudri, Tahsil & Distnct Dhamtari (C.G) WRJT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLB 226 OF THE CON8TITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Shri P.P. Safau, Counsel for the petitioner. Shri N.K. Agrawal, Senior Advocate aud Deputy Advocate General with SIiri A.S. Kachliwaha, Govt. Advocate for fhe State/respondents. ORM, OKDER (31.10.2007) SUOTL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard. Learued counsel for the petitioner subinits fhat a pennauent Gang-iaan is to be retired at fhe age of 62 years in accordance wifh fhe Chhattisgarh Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivarshiki-Ayu) Adhiniywn 1967 read with Fundamental Rules, 56. He also submits tfaat the poiat raised bas been decided by this Court m batch ofmatters i.e. W.P. No. 108/2005 aad maay other connected inatters on 04.01.2007, reported in SOOTJSIC.GM.J. 29 (Gootnd 8s Others vs. State ofC.G. and others) and this matter is squarely covered by fhat decision, wluch niay be disposed ofon fhe same tenns. W.P.(S)No.5222/2007 Leamed coimsel for fhe State fairly agrees fhat this niatter is covered by thc said decision, However, he subinits fhat iu some inatters fhe State has ffled writ appeals. Utdess some interim order is passed, inerely on account of filing of the writ appeal, heariag of this writ petition cannot be kept in abeyance, when fhe aiatter is squarely covered by the said judgjment. In the result, this petition is allowed. It is disposed of ia terms of the order dated 04.01.2007 passed ia W.P. No. 108/2005 aad other comiected matters. No order as to cost. Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Rao/ Shyna