IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3348 of 2010 1. BIBHISHAN RAM S/O RAMJI RAM R/O VILL.- TULSIPUR, P.S.- KHARIK BAZAR ( NAUGACHIA ), DISTT.- BHAGALPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION BIHAR, PATNA 3. REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION BHAGALPUR, DISTT.- BHAGALPUR 4. COMMISSIONER BHAGALPUR DISTT.- BHAGALPUR 5. DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, BHAGALPUR DISTT.- BHAGALPUR 6. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE BHAGALPUR, DISTT.- BHAGALPUR ----------- 2 13/12/2010 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State, the Court can only observe that the case of the petitioner will have to be considered in light of the circular which has been issued by the Personnel Department in the background of the decision rendered by the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court which is the case of Uma Devi. Petitioner cannot get a better claim than that. If petitioner comes within the parameters of said policy decision of the State, he has a right for consideration or else the law will take its course. - 2 - This writ application is disposed of with the above observation. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)