•I. ^'^'p--.^. HIGH COURT OF CHKATriSGAKH AT 'ni '.(SS HO Vs. 2. 4. Dalpat Smgh,-s/°S1m Sunder Singh Tliakur, aged about 28 years, R/o Baadipaia, Vfflage Kilepal, Post Ifflcpal, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh State of Chliattisgarh tlirough the Secretaiy, Departnieiit of Panchayat and Rural Developnient Govemineut of Chliattisgarh, DKS Bhavon, Mmistry. RainurfCG) The Depuly Director, Departineiit of Panchayat and Riu-al Developnieut, Jagdalpur District Bastar CG The Chief Executive Officer, Block Bastanar, District Bastar, CG Gram Pancliayat Jamgaon, Throiigh Sarpaach, Block Bastenar, District PBTITI01S UNDERARTICLE; 286 QP THE Shri A1ok Dewangan, counsel for the petjtioner. Shii Pradeep Singh, Paael Lawyer for the State on advance copy. GR&L ORDER (26.11.2007) Heard. I^eamed counsel for the petitioner argiles that the petitioner was appointed as a PancTiayat. Kai-niidn 20.7.1998 and he was working on the sajd post tiB Febniaiy, '2007, but. by an oral order of teriiimation, ti'ie seivices of the petitioner have been terminate.d by respondent No.3, which is not in accordance witli law. Ou being ponatedly askerl from leamed coiinsel for ttse petitioner tbat whet.her any statutoiy remedy has been availed by t-iic petitione.r or not. ?, he subiuita that. ao statiitoiy reinedy has W.P. (S) No.7051/2007 2 been availed by tiie petitioner though representations have been [iven to the Collector as well as the C.E.O. etc. In wiew ofthis, I am not inclmed to adBiit ilvs petition. The petition is disposed of at tliis stage. However, the petitioner shaU be at Uberty to avail the statiitory reiaedy befolie Uie concemed authorily in accordance with tl-.e Panchayat. Act and the Rules fi-amed thereunder. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judee ^i^t-t/VQ ( fr^