1 crap3011.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3011 OF 2011 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3010 OF 2011 Prakash Namdeo Yadhav ...Applicant VERSUS Bhausaheb Karbhari Sadafal ...Respondent ..... Shri M.A.Jahagirdar, advocate for applicant Shri S.K.Shinde, advocate for respondent absent ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : 14th November, 2011 PER COURT : 1 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2 This is an application preferred by the applicant for condonation of delay of 25 days caused in filing the accompanying Criminal Application seeking leave to file appeal. 3 For the reasons stated in the application, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily and it further 2 crap3011.11 appears that the delay caused in filing the accompanying application is not willful, deliberate and intentional and same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 4 Hence, present Criminal Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B' thereof and delay of 25 days caused in filing the accompanying application seeking leave to file appeal stands condoned and present Criminal Application stands disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE), JUDGE. dbm/crap3011.11