^wf '-^l^lrt<l, tPTTl^-i<i<o, Rlrtltiy*< TFT^T^TTT^ OT^^Tcinf^Tfcp cT^n^^T^^f^ 3TT^9T IWP (^cl^cl^) ^200 ^^TT^ ^rf^T 3H^$T wl PBTITIONBR Aiul agedj ProsAciition Stati^) (CG) Verlsus RESPONDBNTS 1. Statel of Chhattisgarh, fhrough Secretary, pf Home, D.K.S. Bhavaa, D^trict- |ir (CG) 2. Direc|Lor, Directorate of Public Prosecution, Dist4ct-Raipur (CG) Depa^tiaeut Raipi|i WRIT PETITION CON^TITUTION OF INDIA SB: HOW. SHR1 DHIRBNDRlA MI8HRA. J 17-11-2008 Shn Sunil Ofcvaai, Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, D-f Heard. The petitioner, who i^ Officer at Maaendragarh, for certain inisconduct. By fhe legality and vaUdity of Enquiry Officer on the permittiag assistaace of Co| preliaiuiary enquiry as well clurmg preliminary enquiry T^. cpi<4fc^TlTi +ii+ioY^Csl<) ^FJI^I^ ^ari^Tsn^sT P. [81 No.6346/2008 Kuxaar Garg, S/o. Late Shri K.K. Garg, about 37 years, Assistaiit Distdct Officer Maaendragarh, R/o. PoMce >u & Tahsil -Manendragarh, Distiict-Korea UNDER ARTICLB 226 OF THE co^insel for tlie petitioner. . Govt. Advocate for fhe State. posted as Assistant Distiict Prosecution Di|strict-Korea is facmg departmental enquiry piis petition the petitioner has questioned t^e departmeutal enquiiy conducted by the g4>und that tlie deliaqueiit officer is not ^officer aad secondly, fhat fhe copy of tfae as statements of the witaesses recorded Diave not been furaished. __ /y^\ f"4^Z. \ ^ ^..y/ "%^!fty ;3^T;:?TRTTo5?T, U>TT|^<I<?, Rrti^^ ^^^ *11*1«1^TT^ 3TT^9T q^(»(^c|I^6|<£;) ^200 3TT^5TcpTRFTtcp ^^3TT^$T^qtc}? |iNNNtNN|^ ^ ?^TT^ ^rf^T 3TT^$T 2 -I From penisal of fhe with this petition, it appe^ allowiag assistaace of C}< Director/ respondent No.2, | petitioner xaakes stateinent eitlier by tiie Enquiiy Office|r secoudly, that copy of fhe s^ preliininaxy enquiry have al^ fact has already been dispu1| Siiice the above disp|i record of fhe Enquiry Of!\ dn'ection to the Enqiiiry by referring the record enqurry. Offiber an|d cpi<4fc")41^+ii+ioV^'fe^t ^FJI^I^ ?l?3l1^iH3Tr^?T <|locunients along wifh aanexnres annexed ^irs fhat fhe prayer of flie petitioner for [o-officer was already allowed by the though the leamed counsel for the |that no such pemiission was ever graated ^ or by tfae Director/respondent No.2; aiid lateiaents of the witaesses recorded diiring |>o been fumished to fhe petitioner an^d this ^d by the petitioner iii the instant petition. |ute caii be sorted-oiit by referring to fhe [cer, fhis petition is disposed of with a to decide the grievaace of fhe petitioner after such decisiou, proceed with the Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge