IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No. 23894 of 2000 Between: 1 St. Mary's Educational Society, Rep. by its President and Correspondent : Kum.P.Rose Mary D/o. Balaswamy R/o. B-16, Gouthamnagar, Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District. 2 St. Mary's Engineering College, Rep. by its President and Correspondent : Kum.P.Rose Mary D/o. Balaswamy R/o. B-16, Gouthamnagar, Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The State of A.P. Rep.by its Secretary, Technical Education, Govt. of A.P., Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Technical Education, BRKR Bhavan, Opp : Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3 The Chairman, High Power Commiittee, Grant of NOC's for granting of Engineering College, JNTU ,Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 4 The Chairman, All India Technical Education, I.B.Sports Complex, L.B.Street, New Delhi. 5 Sindoor Education Society Rep.by its Secretary and Correspondent, NTPC Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District. 6 Vivekananda Educational Society, Rep.by its Secretary and Correspondent, NTPC, Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the respondents 1 to 3 in not granting NOC (No Objection Certiﬁcate) to the 2nd petitioner college and the action of the respondents 1 to 3 in granting NOC to respondents 5 and 6 for 2001-2002 and 2002-2003 academic years is illegal arbitrary and discriminatory violative of Arts. 14,29 and 30 of the Constitution of India, and further declare that the petitioner college is entitled for grant of approved by the AICTE (4th respondent) without reference to non grant to NOC by State Government and further declare the Petitioner college is entitled to be given NOC basing on Ist Notification, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.SURENDER RAO Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION The Court made the following Order: Since none appeared for the petitioners on 28-08- 2008, the writ petition was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, neither the counsel for the petitioner is present nor is there any representation on his behalf. Hence the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No costs. RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J Dt:10-09-2008 Usd To 1 The Secretary, Technical Education, Govt. of A.P., Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Technical Education, BRKR Bhavan, Opp : Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3 The Chairman, High Power Commiittee, Grant of NOC's for granting of Engineering College, JNTU ,Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 4 The Chairman, All India Technical Education, I.B.Sports Complex, L.B.Street, New Delhi. 5 The Secretary and Correspondent Sindoor Education Society, NTPC Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District. 6 The Secretary and Correspondent, Vivekananda Educational Society, NTPC, Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District. 7 Two CCs to GP for Technical Education, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 8 Two CD copies