IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16977 of 2011 Rajendra Yadav @ Barak Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02 24.06.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of the petition. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 448, 411, 379, 323, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged against the petitioner is to have taken away diesel pumping set and other articles of the informant. It is also alleged that the articles were taken away since the informant purchased the land which was previously being bought by the petitioner's side. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that F.I.R. was lodged on 12.02.2011 at 11:00 A.M. when the seizure was made on 13.02.2011 at 2:25 P.M. but the seizure list does not reflect that the articles were seized form the 2 petitioner. Considering the fact that in the background of admitted land dispute somehow clouds the bonafide of the accusation, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, Patna, in connection with Ranitalab P.S. Case No. 19 of 2011, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)