1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1272 OF 2007 IN SECOND APPEAL St. NO. 20096 OF 2007 Raghunath Bhikaji Shinde since deceased through L.Rs. Bajirav Raghunath Shinde & ors........Applicants versus Vasant Pandurang Chapade & ors........ Respondents. Mr. P.S. Dani adv. for the Applicants Mr. R. N. Gite adv. for the respondent no.1. CORAM: A. P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 5th FEBRUARY, 2009. P.C.: 1. The applicant no. 1(e) in this application by name Houshabai had expired during pendency of the first appeal before the District Judge. However, the appellant before the District Judge who is respondent no.1 herein did not take steps with a view to bring the L.Rs. of applicant no.1(e) on record. The appeal came to be allowed by the first appellate court and hence this second appeal. 2. Acording to the applicants as all the legal heirs of the deceased are already on record, the present application is formal in nature in as much as it proposes to indicate the L.Rs. who are already on record in the capacity as legal representatives of the 2 deceased. As the prayer made in the present application, is formal in nature, the same is allowed. Application is disposed of. (A. P. DESHPANDE, J.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1273 OF 2007 3 IN SECOND APPEAL St. NO. 20096 OF 2007 Raghunath Bhikaji Shinde since deceased through L.Rs. Bajirav Raghunath Shinde & ors........Applicants versus Vasant Pandurang Chapade & ors........ Respondents. Mr. P.S. Dani adv. for the Applicants Mr. R. N. Gite adv. for the respondent no.1. CORAM: A. P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 5th FEBRUARY, 2009. P.C.: 1. The applicant no. 1(d) in this application by name Nivrutti Raghunath Shinde had expired during pendency of the first appeal before the District Judge. However, the appellant before the District Judge who is respondent no.1 herein did not take steps with a view to bring the L.Rs. of applicant no.1(e) on record. The appeal came to be allowed by the first appellate court and hence this second appeal. 2. Acording to the applicants as all the legal heirs of the deceased are already on record, the present application is formal in nature in as much as it proposes to indicate that the parties who are already on record are also shown in the capacity as legal representatives of the deceased. As the prayer made in the present application, is formal in nature, the same is allowed. 4 Application is disposed of. (A. P. DESHPANDE, J.)