IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO : 8532 of 2009 Between: 1 Maddina Sekharaiah (A-1) S/o. Sundaraiah R/o. Gotlapalem Village, Manubolu Mandal, SPSR Nellore Dist. 2 Krishnamaneni Venkateswarlu (A-2) S/o. Venkaiah R/o. Gotlapalem Village, Manubolu Mandal, SPSR Nellore Dist. 3 Chinta Ramana Reddy (A-3) S/o. Subba Reddy R/o. Gotlapalem Village, Manubolu Mandal, SPSR Nellore Dist. 4 Pandipati Venkaiah (A-4) S/o. Subba Rami Reddy R/o. Gotlapalem Village, Manubolu Mandal, SPSR Nellore Dist. 5 Maddina Venkaiah (A-5) S/o. Sundaraiah R/o. Gotlapalem Village, Manubolu Mandal, SPSR Nellore Dist. 6 Yepati Kondaiah (A-6) S/o. Padma Naidu R/o. Gotlapalem Village, Manubolu Mandal, SPSR Nellore Dist. 7 Krishnamaneni Madhu Sudan (A-7) S/o. Venkama Naidu R/o. Gotlapalem Village, Manubolu Mandal, SPSR Nellore Dist. 8 Putta Manohar @ Manoj (A-8) S/o. Bhaskara Naidu R/o. Gotlapalem Village, Manubolu Mandal, SPSR Nellore Dist. 9 Pandipati Raghava Reddy (A-9) S/o. Subba Rami Reddy R/o. Gotlapalem Village, Manubolu Mandal, SPSR Nellore Dist. 10 Pandipati Jaya Rami Reddy (A-10) S/o. Subba Rami Reddy R/o. Gotlapalem Village, Manubolu Mandal, SPSR Nellore Dist. 11 Chinta Rama Krishna Reddy (A-11) S/o. Subba Reddy R/o. Gotlapalem Village, Manubolu Mandal, SPSR Nellore Dist. 12 Maddina Ramanaiah S/o. Sundaraiah R/o. Gotlapalem Village, Manubolu Mandal, SPSR Nellore Dist. 13 Namburu Maheswar S/o. Masthanaiah R/o. Gotlapalem Village, Manubolu Mandal, SPSR Nellore Dist. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court Buildings, Hyderabad, Through P.S. Manubolu, Nellore Dist. 2 Gunti Venkateswarlu S/o. Bujjaiah R/o. Gotlapalem, Arundatiya Wada, Manubolu Mandal, SPSR Nellore Dist. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Section ____ of Crl.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased toto call for the records relating to Crime No. 122 / 2009 on the file of P.S. Manubolu, SPSR Nellore District and quash the same as illegal. The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.KRISHNAN, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent. CRIMINAL PETITION NO : 8829 of 2009 Between: 1 Nellore Gopal (A-12) S/o. Venkaiah R/o. Gotlapalem Village, Manubolu Mandal, SPSR Nellore Dist. 2 Yapati Suresh (A-14) S/o. Gopal Naidu R/o. Gotlapalem Village, Manubolu Mandal, SPSR Nellore Dist. 3 Gandavarapu Prathap Reddy (A-15) S/o. Krishna Reddy R/o. Gotlapalem Village, Manubolu Mandal, SPSR Nellore Dist. 4 Rayapuneni Sri Hari Naidu (A-16) S/o. Rama Subbaiah R/o. Gotlapalem Village, Manubolu Mandal, SPSR Nellore Dist. 5 Badugu Venkateswarlu (A-17) S/o. Subbaiah R/o. Gotlapalem Village, Manubolu Mandal, SPSR Nellore Dist. 6 Chinta Srinivasulu Reddy (A-18) S/o. Ramana Reddy R/o. Gotlapalem Village, Manubolu Mandal, SPSR Nellore Dist. 7 Namburu Maheswara Naidu (A-19) S/o. Mastan Naidu R/o. Gotlapalem Village, Manubolu Mandal, SPSR Nellore Dist. 8 Pandipati Dasaradha Rami Reddy (A-20) S/o. Subba Rami Reddy R/o. Gotlapalem Village, Manubolu Mandal, SPSR Nellore Dist. 9 Jana Ramanaiah (A-22) S/o. Ramaiah R/o. Gotlapalem Village, Manubolu Mandal, SPSR Nellore Dist. 10 Ganta Sudhakar (A-23) S/o. Sundaraiah R/o. Gotlapalem Village, Manubolu Mandal, SPSR Nellore Dist. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court Buildings, Hyderabad, Through P.S. Manubolu, Nellore Dist. 2 Gunti Venkateswarlu S/o. Bujjaiah R/o. Gotlapalem, Arundatiyawada, Manobolu Mandal, SPSR Nellore Dist. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Section ____ of Crl.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased toto call for the records relating to Crime No. 122 / 2009 on the file of P.S. Manubolu, SPSR Nellore District and quash the same as illegal in so far as petitioners / Accused No. 12, 14 to 20, 22 and 23. The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.KRISHNAN, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent. The Court made the following: PSR, J. Crl.P.Nos. 8532 and 8829 of 2009 Common Order: As both the petitions relate to the same crime, both the petitions are heard together and disposed of by this common order. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners in both the petitions and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that the investigation into the crime and the consequential proceedings based on the result of the investigation shall go on. However, the petitioners, in both the petitions, shall not be arrested till filing of the charge sheet, if any. 4. With the directions as above, the both the petitions are disposed of. _______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. October 28, 2009. *BVS Note: Furnish CC tomorrow. (BO) BVS.