IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.8486 of 2008 Date of Decision: 20.5.2008 Randhir Singh Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.C.PURI Present: Shri Umesh Narang, Advocate for the petitioner Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral) Counsel states that the petitioner was taken in service on regular basis in the month of November 1997. On the basis of some Vigilance enquiry, in which the petitioner was not associated, now it has been decided to terminate his service vide order dated 2.5.2008 (P/2). Counsel for the petitioner contends that without conducting regular enquiry under the rules, the petitioner cannot be thrown out of service. To say so, reliance has been placed upon a Division Bench judgment of this Court in Sheela Devi v. State of Haryana and others (CWP No.5770 of 2008) decided on 7.4.2008 (P/5). Shri Rathee has failed to show us anything to the contrary. In view of facts mentioned above, this writ petition is disposed of in the same terms as in Sheela Devi’s case (supra). (Jasbir Singh) Judge May 20, 2008 (K.C. Puri) gk Judge