LPA No. 1469 of 2009 [ 1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 15.07.2011 LPA No. 1469 of 2009 M/s Kamal Transport Corporation through Kushal Kumar Jain, Partner ... Appellant Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJENDER SINGH MALIK 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri Sandeep Jain, Advocate,for the appellant. Mr.S.S.Dhaliwal, Addl. A.G., Punjab for respondent no.1. None for respondent no.2. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral). The appellant is aggrieved by the order dated 20.05.2009 passed by the Single Judge of this Court directing the respondents to hand over the vacant possession of the plot in dispute subject to deposit of all arrears of interest/penal interest by the appellant. The appellant was also granted liberty to make representation to the Improvement Trust to allow an alternative site in the event, possession of allotted plot cannot be delivered. The order dated 20.05.2009 passed by the Single Judge of this Court is equitable in nature. On failure to deposit the amount against the plot in dispute, the plot would have incurred the liability of resumption. Instead of the said possibility, the Court has balanced rights. LPA No. 1469 of 2009 [ 2] Keeping in view the said fact, we do not find any ground to interfere in the order passed by the Single Judge. Dismissed. [ HEMANT GUPTA ] JUDGE [ VIJENDER SING MALIK ] JUDGE 15.07.2011 dinesh