1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHS/1243/2009 IN SUIT NO.1952 OF 2006 Mr.Sayed Mustafa Hussaini ...Plaintiff Vs. M/s.Anita Hermy D’souza & ors. ...Defendants. M/s.S.K. Legal Associates for the Plaintiffs. None for the Defendants. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 11th January, 2010. P.C.- 1 An affidavit of service is filed. None appears for the defendants. 2 Considering the averments made and as the chamber summons is filed prior to the service of writ of summons and even there is no written statement on record and even vakalatnama is also not on record, I am inclined to grant this chamber summons in terms of prayers (a) and (b) by keeping all points open. 3 The plaintiffs to take steps for amendment within four weeks. 4 Chamber summons is therefore allowed in terms of prayers (a) and (b). (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)