1 6 D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO.722/2000. Smt. Sushila Dugar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. .. Date of Order :: 11th February 2010. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. SAPRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr. Siddharth Joshi, for the appellant. ..... BY THE COURT: Learned counsel Mr. Siddharth Joshi appearing for the appellant submits that this appeal has rendered infructuous because the subject matter for which this appeal was filed no longer subsists. In other words, it has come to an end by efflux of time. In the light of the statements made by the learned counsel for the appellant, we do not wish to embark upon the merits and demerits of the case nor we wish to enter into the factual matrix much less in detail. It is really not necessary. Accordingly and in view of the statement of the learned counsel for the appellant, we dismiss this appeal as having rendered infructuous. No costs. Certified copy as per Rules. (DINESH MAHESHWARI),J. (A.M. SAPRE),J. /Mohan/