1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO.365 OF 2000. _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _______________________|_______________________________________ CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J. Date : 11.10.2010. 1. The matter has been disposed of in terms of the compromise vide order dated 16.9.2010. Mr.Shah, learned counsel for the appellant has move the matter by filing a praecipe for speaking to minutes. According to him the Respondent No.2-A and Respondent No.3 are one and the same person and the appeal is withdrawn as against Respondent No.2-B and 2-C and compromise is entered into with Respondent No. 3. According to him, as no orders are passed as against Respondent No.2-A, the decree is not being prepared. As Respondent No.2-A and Respondent No.3 are one and the same person and the matter is already compromised with Respondent No.3, no separate order is required to be passed as against Respondent No.2-A. It will be deemed that the matter is compromised with Respondent No.2-A. The fact that the matter also stands compromised with Respondent No.2-A be effectuated in the main order. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) Dt.11.10.2010. asp/office/fa365.00