IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2553 of 2006 SATISH KUMAR Versus BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite parties : Mr. M.K. Jha, Advocate ------ P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal --------- Dated, the 24th July, 2008. On 2nd December, 2005, the writ petition came to be disposed of by the following order – “This court does not consider it necessary to deal with the proceeding in detail any further. The writ application, is, therefore, disposed off with a direction to respondent no. 6 to examine the grievance of the petitioner and to pay the legitimate dues of his late father in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of the copy of this order. The petitioner would be entitled to the interest at the rate of 10% on the retirement dues, if any, from the date that the same became payable till the date of actual payment.” 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that he is entitled to leave encashment amount for 240 days whereas he has been paid leave encashment for 120 days only and thereby the opposite parties have committed disobedience of the order dated 2nd December, 2005. 3. Opposite party nos. 1 to 6 have shown cause and denied that any disobedience of the order dated 2nd December, 2005 - 2 - has been made by them. 4. We have carefully perused the order dated 2nd December, 2005 and, in our view, the order does not say that the petitioner shall be paid leave encashment of 240 days. A direction was given to the respondent no. 6 to examine the grievance of the petitioner and pay the legitimate dues of his late father in accordance with law. The leave encashment of 120 days have been found due and has been paid. 5. We are satisfied that nothing further needs to be done in this matter. Contempt petition (M.J.C.) is disposed of accordingly. R. M. Lodha, CJ Kishore K. Mandal, J. Anil/