1 XI—HC-22 mmmw WW3§f3§tW émranm On the other hand, iearnsd counsei for the State has opposau the above prayer. 1 ave head the learned counsel for the appeliant. Considering the statement' of Dr. Govind Singh (RW. ‘3), n appears that the injured Wa‘, aumltted 111 me nospnal on 1d 1 1998 and he iefi ihe hospitai on 13—1-1996 Just aiter two days Wlthout mfomlation to‘fue hospitai administration and aiso considering that the appeilant has underg the]an sentence of two years and 4 months out of the totai sentence imposed upon him ol three years, the conviction impose upon the appellant under Sections 323 allfl J'Zb 01 l 1" L 13 ma‘l however, the sentence is modified and the appellant is sentenced to the period already undergone by him y He he released forthwith if not warranted in any other case. The appeal is accordi [111%W o j ' n d n