IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. W.J.C. No.86 of 2010 REKHA PODDAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ----------- 4. 29.3.2011 A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent no.4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The prayer of the petitioner is that in Complaint Case No.198 of 2004 pending in the court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhanjharpur for the offence under section 498A of the Penal Code although warrant of arrest and processes under sections 82 and 83 of the Code of Criminal Procedure have been issued, but the police are not complying with the order/arresting Pradeep Poddar (respondent no.6). Learned counsel appearing for the State, on the other hand, submits that the aforesaid coercive processes, which have been issued, are not pending in Jhanjharpur Police Station. This being a complaint case, it being issued directly to respondent no.6. Learned counsel points out that the court below vide order dated 17.7.2007 after having taken note of the above fact, has declared the accused as absconder and necessary entry has been made as also permanent warrant of arrest has been issued. It further appears from the aforesaid order that since the petitioner was not inclined to given evidence in terms of section 299 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the record of the case was deposited. In view of the above, I am not inclined to interfere with - 2 - the mater. However, it will be open for the petitioner to take any further recourse available to her as per law. The writ application stands disposed of. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)