: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.162 OF 2009 Manish Mordani ....Petitioner V/s. The Greater Bombay Co-operative . Bank Ltd. and another ....Respondents Mr.Dara Zaiwala i/b A.A. Siddiquie & Associates for the Petitioner. Mr.Sameer Bhalekar for Respondent No.1. Mr.J.S. Saluja, A.G.P. for Respondent No.2. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.428 OF 2009 Jasmine Corporation through . its Prop.Jasmina P. Aildasani ....Petitioner V/s. The Greater Bombay Co-operative . Bank Ltd. and another ....Respondents Mr.Dara Zaiwala i/b A.A. Siddiquie & Associates for the Petitioner. Mr.J.S. Saluja, A.G.P. for Respondent No.2. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 23RD MARCH, 2009. P.C. : 1. The impugned orders warrant no interference. The proceedings under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 are only qua the properties over which the security was : 2 : created for repayment of the dues of the bank. Subsequent proceedings for the purposes of having the claim adjudicated and even for execution qua other properties, if any, of the debtors, must be taken under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. Whether the property which is secured ought to be sold before the execution is levied as against any other properties, is a matter which the Executing Court will decide. 2. In the circumstances, both the Writ Petitions are dismissed.