IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 12058 of 2009 Between: Sabia Sultana D/o. M.M.A. Quadri, Aged 30 years R/o.H.No.2-4-72/3, Plot No.10, Paramareddy Hills, Upparpally village, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Division, Lakdikapul, Hyderabad. 2 The Station House Officer, Police Station Rajendra Nagar, RR.District. 3 The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rajendranagar Circle, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad. 4 Md.Kazim, S/o Not Known to the petitioner, R/o.H.No.2-6-14/5/A, Plot No.75, Heeranagar, Upparpally Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not taking action on the representation of the petitioner dt. 3-3-2009 and not stopping the dog breading and other commercial activities etc., in H.No. 2-6-14/5/A Plot No. 75 Heeranagar, Upparpally Village, Rajendranagar and not demolishing illegal structure including the gate therein as illegal, unconstitutional and violative of Art. 14, 21 and 300A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 not to permit any commercial activity particularly dog breading by the 4th respondent and demolish the illegal, structure of the 4th respondent made without permission in H.No. 2-6-14/5/A, Plot No. 75, Heeranagar, Upparpally Village, R.R. District and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.A.MUJEEB Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: SMT.KALPANA EKBOTE Govt. Pleader for Home The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondent No.3, in considering the petitioner’s representation dated 03.03.2009 complaining about the alleged illegal structures raised by the 4th respondent herein at House No.2-6-14/5/A, Plot No.75, Heeranagar, Upparapally village, Rajendranagar, thereby blocking the way leading to the colony of the petitioner, as arbitrary and illegal. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. As could be seen from the material on record, the representation/complaint of the petitioner, dated 3.3.2009 was received in the office of the 3rd respondent on 04.03.2009. In the circumstances, the third respondent is bound to make necessary enquiry into the allegations made by the petitioner in his representation/complaint, dated 3.3.2009. 4. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion as to the correctness of the allegations made by the petitioner in his representation/complaint dated 3.3.2009, the third respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 3.3.2009 and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity to the 4th respondent to rebut the allegations made. Such an exercise shall be completed, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly, at the stage of admission. No costs. _____________ G.ROHINI, J 22nd June 2009 RAR THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 12058 of 2009 DATED :22-06-2009