G? HIGH COUR'E' OF CHHATTI$€ARHAT $ILA§PQR M.A. 637 of 2005 CGRAM'. Hon'ble Shri 5R. Naynk, CJ & Hon'ble‘ Shri Dilip Raosuheb Deshmukh. J. Ap%pellanfs CIKImmk \ Ram Singh, 5/0 Shri Pan‘l'an 5in9h; aged about 55 years. Ghnsin Bai, W/c Shri Rum Singh, ugud abou‘l' 52 year-s. 3. Ganesh singh, S/oShri Ram Singh, aged ’ abou‘l' 15 years. minor ‘rhr-ough Guardian Ram Singh. AII residen‘r of Village-Nandoi Disfr. Rojnandgaon (C.6.) Versus Reispondenfs (D‘river') ‘ 1. Poshan LoL 5/0. Shri Than Singh Halba, aged obou? 25 years, R/o vmoge- Hodgehon, Thono-Arjundu, Tuhsil - Gundodehi, Disf‘l'. - Durg (C.G.) 2. Knpil Kumar- Sahu, Sic. Shri 'u'a'ol'a iiorn s Sahu, aged abou‘r 35 ye n/o Vi:ki§e 6i Post - Polar-i, Thana - Gurur, Disfr. - bur-g (C.6.) 3. Unifed India Insurance Co. Lfd. Through Divl. Manager, Krishna Compiex Kechahari Chow, Disff. Raiour (Ca) 4. Mansha Ram, 5/0 $hri C.hain Singh; R/o Village - Hadgahan, Thana - ArJunda, Tahsii - Gundadeha, Dim. - burg (ch) OWner i . Tmli Owner i S ri Srikumar Agrawal, 5r. Advoaafe wifh Anand Shukla; Counsel for 1’h appellant Shri Rajendra Tripa'rhi, Advocate assisling Shri Prashanf Mishra, Sr. Colmsel for fhe Insuranoekompany. a “x (P 7“ 00 assed oh 1' Janimi‘y, 26) Q The following oral order of fhe ,urf s psed by Co wa as S..NAYAK, R CJ. 1. The appallan'rs are 1’he parents and or younger brother of T decease In fh appea fhey seek mor compensa'o 2. Wha was urged by 4 learned counsel for fhe appellts Is ff fhe no‘l' sd ’g Te mon'rhly come of fhe deed at 00/ y hag oe That The deceased was e dy come of R 100/- on The ground ThaT Te deceased cld oT ha secured wk all The days of The onT IT was also coTeded ThT whaT awarded Tards loss o 'love and affecon Is on lower sid IT was furTher conTended ThaT The MoTor ccidenTs Clims Tribunal (M.A.C.T.) is noT jusTified in noT awarding any cpenTion er The head ‘loss of esTaTe'. 3. Having heard The learned counsel for The parTies, The only Ton ThaT arises or our consideraTion is 'wheTher The cosaTion warded by The M.A.T., in The facTs an circumsTances o he case and The evidence on recor. could be regarded as a .iusT an easonablecompensaTion wiThin conTelaTion f‘ MoTo Vehicles A, 1988 (fo sho ‘The AcT'). 4. In our considere opnion. e M.A.C.T. havng Taken The daily e : The deceased aT Rs.1/- ough To have comouTed The mTy income aT Rs. 00l The order passed b The ThaT h dceased woul have worked onl for 26 days a monTh shows ve reaso If e Ta Th nThly come of The deed ‘i' Rs.3,000- and deduc‘l’ 1/3” of T same Towars his psol expenses an aply Tiplr 11 having regar To The one of Th moer of The deceased on The daTe o accienT, The ToTaI 'loss v: ORAL ORDER mln he d ls l e hn f he an ha M A C T Is Juhfle m 1akm h m ecas Rs26- onl vm pind armng all In s h ou n ve or mh nn a ls ow f Tl ; e. A a omsa und 1 . q si f mpen a C. d f T d d r mp o r cT r rT d i Th i incom of 00 T onhl 3 0- y M A C T Te e d y in perrsiTy In ning w ke e mo In epns Q / he d erna d p The mulie d e Th f d vx A g- of dependency would come 1’0 Rs.2,64,000/- (2000 x 12 x 11). In addifion we award a'qsum of Rs 20 000/- Towards Ioss of 'love and affechon Rs 20 OOOI- fowords 'Ioss of esfafe' and Rs 5000/- fowards funeral expenses Thus fhe appellanf—clmmanfs are en'h'rled To tom! compensaflon of Rs.3,90,000/- wrrh Inferesf af 6% from 'rhe da're of claim pe‘ri'tion fill payment The impugned order shall stand modified in; fhe above ferms. l 1 1 5i The appeal is allowed To the exfen‘r indicaied above. The fies shall bear Their respec-hve cosis ir This appeal i i i l 6; The Insuranoe-Company shall deposrr fhe balance compensation money wifhm six weeks from foday and on such deposrl' being made The M.A.C.T. shall disburse/invest *he compensation money in The same, propor'l'ions, if any, as specified by if in the impugned award. T‘ «l // Sdl- Dmp Raosaheb Deshmukh udge Sdl- Chief Justice E i r