IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No.10333 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: 27.7.2009 Maa Sarswati College of Education ...Petitioner VERSUS National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi and another …Respondents CORAM HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI PRESENT: Mr.Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Vishal Aggarwal, Advocate for respondents Permod Kohli, J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved of the order dated 10.6.2009 (Annexure P-8) passed by respondent no.2 withdrawing the recognition granted to the petitioner-Institution on 27.8.2006 vide Annexure P-2. It is further stated by the petitioner that subsequently, the intake capacity of the petitioner- Institution was enhanced from 100 to 200 seats and a fresh order was passed in this regard on 28.8.2007. While granting enhancement, the respondents were satisfied regarding the availability of the infrastructure for enhancement of intake capacity with the petitioner-Institution. Now the recognition granted to the petitioner has been withdrawn by the impugned order (Annexure P-8) on the ground that the list of Faculty selected by duly constituted Selection Committee as per NCTE norms is not submitted. It is CWP No.10333 of 2009 :2: not the case of the respondents that the petitioner does not have the Faculty. The only default seems to be non-submission of the lists. Be that as it may. The petitioner has preferred a statutory appeal which is still pending. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of at this stage with the direction to the Appellate Authority to decide the statutory appeal within a period of four months. In the meanwhile, the petitioner shall be entitled to all the benefits of recognition, notwithstanding the pendency of the appeal. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 27.7.2009 MFK