IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.LAKSHMANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 2821 of 2002 Between: 1 A.P.Geno, rep.by it's Chariman-cum-Managing Direactor, Vidyut Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. 2 The Chief Engineer, V.T.P.S.,A.P.,Genco., Ibrahimpatnam, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Zone-II ,Eluru, W.G.Dist. 2 B.Nirmala Kumari, D/o. Raja Rao, R/o. 8-239,B-Colony, VTPS, Ibrahimpatnam, Krishna district. 3 P.Renuka, W/o. Venkateswara Rao, R/o. 8-239,B-Colony, VTPS, Ibrahimpatnam, Krishna district.. 4 N.Bala, W/o. Nagabhushanam, R/o. 8-239,B-Colony, VTPS, Ibrahimpatnam, Krishna district. 5 B.Krupamma, W/o. Raja Rao, R/o. 8-239,B-Colony, VTPS, Ibrahimpatnam, Krishna district. 6 G.Tirupahamma,, W/o. Lingaraju, R/o. 8-239,B-Colony, VTPS, Ibrahimpatnam, Krishna district. 7 K.Mariyamma, W/o. Nagabhushanam, R/o. 8-239,B-Colony, VTPS, Ibrahimpatnam, Krishna district. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ order or direction more fully in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent herein suomoto coducting the re-enquiry and submitting the report dt.5.11.2001 stating the respondent no.2 to 7 fall within the 33 prohibited category as illegal,improper arbitrary and consequently declare the respondent No.2 to 7 are not entitled for absorption in the service of A.P.Genco and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.SAMINENI KISHORE, SC for APTRANSCO Counsel for the Respondent No.1: G.P. for Labour. Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 7: MR.G.V.SHIVAJI The Court made the following : ORDER (Per the Honourable Smt.Justice T.Meenakumari) When this matter is taken up for hearing, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the point involved in this writ appeal is squarely covered by an un reported judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.1857 of 2004, dated 1st December, 2004. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the above Division Bench Judgment. ______________________ (T.MEENAKUMARI, J) 21st JULY, 2005 __________________________ (P.LAKSHMANA REDDY,J) gurc/rkk To 1. The Dy.commissioner of Labour, Zone-II, Eluru, W.G.Dist. 2. Two C.Cs. to the learned G.P. for Labour, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 3. 2. two CD copies 4. One CC to Mr.G.V.Shivaji, Advocate 5. One CC to E.Urmila, Advocate THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.LAKSHMANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO :2821 OF 2002 (Order delivered by the Honourable Smt.Justice T.Meena Kumari) 21st JULY, 2005.