1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.35 of 2006 (D) (Chanda Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and others v. Uddhao Harbaji Tajane and others) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri A.S. Chandurkar, Advocate for Petitioners. Shri R.M. Sharma, Advocate, holding for Shri A. Parchure, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Shri Mujumdar, AGP for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. Coram : R.K. Deshpande, J. Dated : 7 th October, 2010 This petition was decided on 31-8-2010. While disposed of this petition, this Court has observed in para 12 as under : “ Shri Chandurkar, learned counsel for the petitioner has invited my attention to the order dated 20 th June, 2006, by which the petitioners were directed to deposit 50% of the arrears of salary of the respondent no.1. Accordingly, an amount of Rs.2,28,880/- has been deposited in this Court on 16.09.2006. In view of the fact that the matter is sent back to the School Tribunal for decision afresh, the office is directed to remit this amount of Rs.2,28,880/- along with interest to the School Tribunal at Chandrapur, which shall pass the 2 appropriate order in respect thereof after the decision of the appeal. The tribunal is directed to decide the appeal within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the writ from this Court.” The learned counsel for respondent No.1 has pointed out that an amount of Rs.2,28,880/- has been withdrawn by respondent No.1/employee by furnishing security and pursis to that effect, bearing stamp No.9798 of 2006, was filed on 14-11- 2006. In view of this, the question of transmitting an amount of Rs.2,28,880/- to the School Tribunal, as observed in para 12, reproduced above, does not arise. However, the security furnished by respondent No.1/employee on 14-11-2006 be transmitted to the Tribunal and the Tribunal shall pass appropriate orders thereon after the decision of the appeal. Judge pdl