THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.19479 of 2010 Date : 27-9-2010 Between : M/s.Hindusthan Shipyard Workers Co- operative House Building Society Limited, Regn.No.B 1990, Gandhigram, Visakhapatnam, represented by its Vice President K.Appala Raju .. Petitioner And Special Chief Secretary to the Government, Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, A.P., Hyderabad and others .. Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Sri G.Ram Gopal Counsel for respondents : Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (Assignments) The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.19479 of 2010 ORDER: The innocuous relief being claimed by the writ petitioner in this Writ Petition is to issue a mandamus to the respondents to process the petitioner’s application for allotment of Ac.0-72 cents in various survey numbers of Madhurawada village, Visakhapatnam, on market value. It is the pleaded case of the petitioner, which is a Co- operative Housing Society Limited, that on its application dated 10-1- 2008 to allot Ac.0-72 cents on market value, respondent No.2 has called for a report through respondent No.1, from respondent No.3. The grievance of the petitioner is that so far the petitioner’s application has not been considered and appropriate orders passed. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (Assignments) submitted that the Government needs the above mentioned land which forms part of Ac.2-87 cents and therefore no order has been passed alienating the land in favour of the petitioner. In my opinion, when a report was called for by respondent No.2 on the petitioner’s representation, it should have passed an appropriate order after receiving the report from respondent No.3. Even if respondent No.2 felt that the land in respect of which the petitioner requested for alienation is required by it for a public purpose, it shall pass an appropriate order to that effect and communicate the same to the petitioner. Since that has not been done, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction the respondent No.2 to consider the petitioner’s application dated 10-1-2008 in the light of the report, if any sent by respondent No.3 in pursuance of Memo dated 13-1-2008, pass appropriate order and communicate the same to the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Subject to the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. ___________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY.,J Date : 27-9-2010 AM