IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.580 of 2009 Date of decision: 12.8.2009 Smt. Jangir Kaur and another ......Petitioner(s) Versus Satpal ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. N.L. Sammi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ashok Singla, Advocate for the respondent. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) As per the averments made in this petition, a decree was passed in favour of the petitioners by the Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Faridkot which was affirmed by the Additional District Judge, Faridkot vide his judgment and decree dated 9.2.2007. The respondent filed RSA No.910 of 2007 in this Court. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the respondent submitted an undertaking on 30.4.2007 before this Court seeking two months' time for depositing the decretal amount in the Executing Court and the sale of the attached property of the respondent-appellant was ordered to be stayed for a period of two months. As per the learned counsel for the petitioner, the respondent has failed to honour his aforesaid undertaking given in RSA No.910 of 2007 and thus, has committed the contempt of this Court. It is not in dispute that the stay order dated 30.4.2007 was conditional and there was no stay as the respondent failed to deposit the decretal amount. It may also be noticed that thereafter the petitioners have already filed execution of the judgment and decrees passed by the Courts below in their favour and the execution proceedings are being pursued by them. COCP No.580 of 2009 -2- In view of the aforesaid fact that the decree is being executed and there is no stay in RSA No.910 of 2007, I am not inclined to proceed further in this contempt petition. Rule discharged. However, the petitioners are at liberty to execute the decree passed by the Courts below in their favour in accordance with law. August 12, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE