[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 3314/2007 SHAKUNTALA DEVI GUPTA Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. DATE: 24.07.2007 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RATHORE Mr. Sunit Awasthi for the petitioner. **** By way of this writ petition the petitioner has assailed the order dated 11.05.2006 (Annexure-6). As per the petitioner, the amount which has been asked to be deposited, the petitioner is not liable to make the payment of difference of the amount as the delay caused on account of the respondents and not on the part of the petitioner. After serving notice for demand of justice, the petitioner has preferred the instant writ petition. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have also gone through the impugned order dated 11.05.2006. It appears that the notice for demand of justice sent by the petitioner, has not been considered by the respondents. [2] Therefore, in the interest of justice, I deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the notice for demand of justice pursuant to the demand raised by the respondents and after considering the same, shall pass speaking order as to how the petitioner is responsible to make the payment of difference amount. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. (K.S. RATHORE),J. /KKC/