IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. 54653-M of 2007 Date of decision:-13.5.2008. Sunder ...Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Namit Gautam, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Jindal, Addl.A.G. Haryana. RAJESH BINDAL J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in terms of order passed on 21.12.2007 he has joined investigation. This fact is not disputed. He has further referred to an affidavit sworn by the complainant stating that he had inadvertently mentioned the name of the petitioner, otherwise, the dispute with the other accused, namely, Raj Kumar has been compromised. Without recording any finding on the merit of the controversy, the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner on 21.12.2007 is made absolute. The petition is disposed of. May 13, 2008 (RAJESH BINDAL) ritu-II JUDGE