IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.6112 of 2009 Decided on : 08.04.2010 Veena Sood ... Petitioner versus Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh & others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present : Mr. R.K.Malik, Sr. Advocate with Mr. J.K.Bedwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vishal Sodhi, Advocate for respondents No.3 & 4. Mr. G.S.Bal, Advocate for respondent No.5. **** 1. To be referred to the reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? *** M.M.KUMAR, J. The instant petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 19.03.2009 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh vide which, the application filed by the petitioner has been rejected. It is conceded position that respondent No.5 – Mrs. Narinder Sethi, has already stopped working as ad hoc Principal of the Govt. Polytechnic for Women, Sector 10, Chandigarh. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the instant petition has therefore been rendered infructuous. We disposed of the instant petition as having been rendered infructuous. (M.M.KUMAR) JUDGE April 08, 2010 (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) sonia JUDGE