1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 85 OF 2006 Sunil Bhardkar & Anr. ... Review Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. Respondents Mr. M.M. Vashi for Petitioner. Mr. R.M. Sawant, Govt. Pleader for R.Nos. 3 and 4. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED: AUGUST 28, 2006 DATED: AUGUST 28, 2006 DATED: AUGUST 28, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The order dated 1st August, 2006 against which review has been sought is the subject matter of S.L.P. before the Apex Court which has been dismissed. The parties who went before the Apex Court had been given time upto 12th September, 2006 to remove their structures. The Review Petitioners were not amongst those who had gone to the Apex Court. . The case of the Review Petitioners is that they were earlier shifted pursuant to the orders and that instead of Respondent No. 4 giving them alternative accommodation at Poonam Nagar, theCorporation to do so. Their representation is pending. If any such representation has already been made, Respondent No. 2 to consider the same and dispose it off according to law. 2 . With the above observations, Review Petition disposed of. . It is made clear that the removal of the structure before the stipulated date i.e. 12th September, 2006 has not been stayed by the order of this court. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)