WPSB 184/2009 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, ACJ. Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has challenged the judgment and order dated 27.08.2009 passed by State Public Services Tribunal, Nainital Bench, Nainital in Claim Petition No.32/N.B/2009, Deewan Nath Goswami vs. State & others. Heard Sri Suresh Chandra Bhatt, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri J.P. Joshi, learned Chief Standing Counsel for the respondents and perused the record. The judgment and order passed by the Tribunal clearly reveals that the petitioner has to participate in the departmental enquiry and as and when final order is passed he shall have a right to approach the Tribunal again. In this writ petition the petitioner has sought the relief for quashing the order passed by the Tribunal as well as suspension order and charge sheet submitted against the petitioner. In our considered view, the relief sought by the petitioner is premature at this stage. As the enquiry is pending against the petitioner, hence, we direct respondent no. 4 District Education Officer, Champawat, who is conducting the enquiry against the petitioner, to conclude the enquiry within a period of three months from the date of passing of this order. With the aforesaid observation, petition is finally disposed of. (B.S.V., J.) (B.C.K., ACJ.) 10.09.2009 SP