:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 116 OF 2007 MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 116 OF 2007 MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 116 OF 2007 Amita Vinay Bhandari ...Applicant. v. Vinay Manohar Bhandari ...Respondent. Mr.V.A.Sugdare , adv. for the Applicant. Mr.Gopal Hegde , adv. for the Respondent. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 13th February, 2008. DATE: 13th February, 2008. DATE: 13th February, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Parties. 2. The respondent/husband, who is residing at Pune filed the Petition P.D.No.129 of 2007 before the Family Court, Pune under Section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act for the custody of his minor son. By this application, the applicant/wife seeks transfer of that petition to the Court of Civil Judge Senior Division, Nanded on the ground that already two petitions filed by both the parties are pending before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Nanded and it will be convenient if this petition is also transferred to the Civil Judge Senior Division, Nanded. According to her, it will be inconvenient for her if she is required to travel to Pune. The respondent/husband has opposed the request. :2: 3. After hearing the learned counsel for both the parties, I am convinced that it will be in the interest of justice that this petition should also be heard alongwith the petition filed by the husband for divorce and another petition filed by the wife for judicial separation. It will reduce inconvenience to both the parties. 4. Therefore, application is allowed. The Petition P.D.No.129 of 2007 is hereby withdrawn from the file of Family Court, Pune and stands transferred to the file of Civil Judge Senior Division, Nanded with direction to hear the said petition alongwith two other petitions pending between the parties before that Court. The learned Civil Judge Senior Division will require the husband to produce the child before the Court only on such date when the presence of the child is absolutely necessary. 3. Application stands disposed off accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)