IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPLUR.C.G.1 MISC. APPEAL ^ ^ OF 2007 APPELLANTS 't] Jaspal Notra s/o Late KaramChandra,Aged-49 years, P^d'tvvS^^^ B.ted......-t^-V^^" » f R6SPONDENT Plainttffs VERSUS :- ^ 2l «.' 3] 3] 4} ^ ^- Kamaljeet Notra w/o Jaspal Notra,Aged 41 years, Both R/o- Sriran Towers Vyapar Vihar, Tah.- Distt.- Bf(aspur,CG Smt.Saroj Notra w/o Late Amarjeet Notra/Aged about 44 years. Ku.Mamta Notra D/o Late Amarjeet Notra Aged about- 20 years, Ku. Juhl Notra D/o Late Amarjeet Notra Aged about- 15 Years^Minor though-mother naturat gaurdtan^Plainttff no.l All R/o-Tikrapara, Tah.- Distt.- Bitaspur,CG State of Chhattrsgarh Through- Collector,BEtaspur District.-Bilaspur [CG] State of Chhattisgarh Through- Collector,Korba Disfrict.-Korba [CG] (Y) /C_ APPEAL U/0 41 Rule t OF CIVL PROX:EDURE CODE EC—78 :^TT^7\ -3T| T^T^^ j ^i-T^^Ti 'sF?TNr ^ -g~^ ^n^r^i, ^rti^j^ie f^wp:F 4t4(4(t^4^^:;M-A.--.'-'-£'^-'"'----'--""-^^^^ W^f 'W^R (;'^3^^) ^^HW^rff^ -^^ ^T^^W^ 'wy^r -^ -fe^ 7f^?R ^3tfTOa^W S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. 24,09,2009 Shri Ravish Verma, Adv^cate Shri RR Sinha, Advocat^ Shri Arvind Dubey, Pan^l Shri Sinha, learned cou 1 to 3 submits that the suit ftaarwal for the appetlants. for respondent No. 1 b 3. al Lawyer for State. nsel appearing for respondent No. plot bearing Khasra No. 134, as Sahu mentioned in annexure A/4 (A{3plicatjon under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 fifed by the appellants her^in) has already been sold by the plaintiffs before filing of ap{3lication (Annexure A/4) by the appeliants. In view of above, Shri yerma, learned counsel appearing for appellants submits that i this appeal has now become infructuous. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order asto costs. Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge