IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27781 of 2008 NOMID @ NOMIR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 24.07.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner is in custody since 21.5.2008, in relation to a complaint case no. C.A.2929/2007 under section 498A of the I.P.C. Contention of the petitioner is that certain misunderstanding in the family has led to filing of the present case. He is still willing to reconcile the differences with his wife. Since he is still to face trial in the matter, keeping him in custody will only make things difficult towards reconciliation. Keeping the above submission in mind as well as the fact that it is a complaint case which has led to the present situation that too in matrimony entered between the parties almost 10 years ago, let the petitioner namely, Nomid @ Nomir, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand ) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M. Katihar in connection with Complain Case No. C.A.2929/2007. Rajeev/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)