IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 7211 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: March 14, 2011 Vishwa Nath and another .. Petitioners Vs. Subhash Chander and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Yogesh Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Devinder Saini, Advocate for Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate for the respondent. A.N. Jindal, J (Oral) Office has reported that C.R. No. 7211 of 2010, fixed for today, is not traceable and the same appears to have been burnt in the fire incident. Learned counsel for the petitioners has supplied copy of the paper book along with annexures. As such, the record stands re- constructed. Heard, Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the decree holder has already taken the possession of the demised premises. In this connection he has produced copy of the order dated 16.11.2010 passed by the Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Kurukshetra, which reads as under :- “Present: Shri Suresh Sharma, counsel for D.Hs. Shri S.P. Sharma and Shri A.S. Malik, Advocate for J.Ds. Warrant of possession received back duly effected. Report perused. At this stage, learned counsel for the D.Hs. has made a statement that present execution petition has been fully satisfied. Therefore, there is no need to proceed with the present execution petition. Same may be dismissed as Civil Revision No. 7211 of 2010 -2- *** withdrawn. In view of the statement of learned counsel for the D.Hs., present execution petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn being fully satisfied. File be consigned to the records, after due compliance. Announced: Sd/- (Dr. Virender Parshad) ACJM/CJ(SD)/RC/KKR 16.11.2010” Keeping in vie*w the fact that the main application has been dismissed as withdrawn being fully satisfied, the instant petition having become infructuous is dismissed. However, the petitioner is relegated to the remedy as provided under the law. March 14, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge