[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.995 OF 2007 Bharat Digamber Oval ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... Mr.K.S.Patil and D.Girme advocate for applicant Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JUNE 06, 2007 DATE : JUNE 06, 2007 DATE : JUNE 06, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.221 of 2005 of Nigadi Police Station. The said case is mainly under Sections 420 and 468 of IPC. 3. Mr.Patil, the learned advocate for the applicant states that the applicant is in custody for over one year and hence, the applicant may be released on bail. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, the learned A.P.P. states that the trial in the present case is going on and 18 witnesses have [-2-] already been examined and only four witnesses remain to be examined. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to grant bail to the applicant at this stage. The application is rejected. However, liberty is granted to the applicant to prefer a fresh application for bail if the trial is not concluded within one month from today. It is made clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. 4. Application is disposed of. [Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.]