1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 599 of 2007 Smt. Kusum Moreshwar Naik, Since deceased through her Legal heir and daughter Smt. Usha Ajit Mahadik. ... Appellant (Orig. Plff.) Vs. Shri Anil Moreshwar Naik & Anr. . Respondents (Org. deft.) Shi P.K.Dhakephalkar,Senior Counsel a/w Mr. Ramesh Karale, Advocate for the appellant. Shri V.A.Thorat, Senior Counselo, a/w. Shri sandesh Deshpande, Advocate, for the respndent No.1. Shri Rajiv Patil, Advocate a/w. Shri Sachin S.Punde, Advocate for the respondent No.2. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 22nd September, 2009. P.C. 1. After arguments at some length, the parties agreed that the matter may be amicably settled. Mrs. Usha Ajit Mahadik, legal heir and daughter of the deceased plaintiff/appellant Kusum Moreshwar Naik, is present with her Senior Counsel, Mr. Dhakephalkar. The respondent No.1 is represented by Mr. Thorat, Senior Counsel and respondent No.2 - M/s. Puranik Builders Pvt.Ltd., who has 2 since purchased the property and rebuilt, is represented by Mr. Patil, Advocate. With consent of the parties and their Counsel, the Appeal stands disposed of in the following terms :- (i) The respondent No.2 – M/s. Puranik Builders Pvt.Ltd. shall pay an amount of Rs.15 lakhs (Rupees fifteen lakh only) to the appellant – Usha Ajit Mahadik, the legal heir of the original appellant, in full and final satisfaction of her claim in the suit property. (ii) The respondent No.2 shall make payment to the appellant by Pay Order on or before 25th September, 2009. If for any reason, the Pay Order cannot be delivered to the appellant, the Pay Order may be delivered to Mr. Dhakephalkar, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant. The Appeal stands disposed of accordingly. 2. As the Appeal itself is finally disposed of, C.A No.509 of 2007 does not survive and stands disposed of. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)