IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 25TH JULY 2008 / 3RD SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 22531 of 2008(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ TOMY PRINCE, SON OF JOSEPH IPEKUTTY AGED 47,MANAKKIL HOUSE, OCHANTHURUTHU P.O., KOCHI, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.MANOJ KUMAR.M RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE INSPECTOR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES FOR ARBITRATION AND EXECUTION, KOCHI-1. 2. KARTHEDOM RURAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KARTHEDOM, MALIPPURAM P.O.. R1 BY SR.GOVT. PLEADER SMT.ANU SIVARAMAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.22531 OF 2008 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of July, 2008 JUDGMENT Having regard to the nature of the order being issued hereunder, notice to the second respondent dispensed with, preserving its right to move for review of this judgment, if aggrieved. Learned senior Government Pleader appears for the first respondent. 2. The petitioner states that he availed the loan in question for the expenses of his father's treatment when his father fell sick and that, to his fortune, his father had been recovered, though under continued medication. It is stated that the recovery proceedings have been taken as a resultof an award passed in his absence, as he could not attend owing to his father's hospitalisation. Ext.P3 is the demand notice issued on 1.7.2008. The petitioner submits that he will be able to pay off the outstandings in six months. This submission is recorded and it is directed that the first respondent will defer further action on the WPC.22531/08 Page numbers basis of Ext.P2, till a decision is communicated by the second respondent on Ext.P4. At any rate, the petitioner will be given sufficient time, by six months, on such terms as may be found necessary. Any accruals by way of penal interest should also be considered for being slashed, if the petitioner makes appropriate request. The petitioner is directed to place a copy of this judgment and copy of the writ petition before the first respondent and a same set before the second respondent. The writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge kkb.25/7.