FE HI©HCOURTOFJUt>ICATURECHHATTIS6ARH:BILASPUR &IVISION BENCH 1 CORAM : HON'BLE^HRI H.L. &ATTU, CJ& HON'BLESHRIV.K.SHRIVASTAVA,J. MA (ONo.344of 2007 Appellant Samelai Yadav, S/o BhukhQn Ram yodciy, cgedJQbout 45 years^^ ViltGge - Nur^ra, ThanaPaH, Tahsil -Sakri,Dist1j.Bilaspur(C@5 Versus RESPONDB'ITS 1) Ekraram jHusain, S/o^^^^^^^^^^^A^ Hussain, jdg^d obout 35 years, R/Q kashi Ncsgor, Niharika Road, Korba,t)jstt - Korba (GG) - Driver ! 2) Anup Kumar NQ^iani, S/o Pritam Nhthani, og^cl dbout 4^ years, Rj/6 AAV Mcrket^ stand^ Bilaspur, bistt-Bilasp^ (C6)—Gwner 3) ©er^ralAAancyer, The Grien^^^ Insurance CompQny Ltd., Throu9h Jbivision Office - On . UTI Bank, Ih front of Rcgiv Plaja, Bus stdnd, bistrict BiQSpur I (C&) —I^ Cohvpany Present : Shri Sameer Singh^counsel fortheop Nohe for the respondents. ORALORDER (Passedon 20th March, 2007) .'A. The followirig oral order of the Gourt was^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^' Vijay Kumar Sbrivastava, J. '^'^,l'''l'.v' ••.;..1::;''.:'- .••'.:••-.:.-'. .';.:.'." ^:. ' '..;:''-..".:^ .•::;"-.' This is\^n appedl filed under Sectipn 17 '\^'^';'.^.<-.':.::^^ :.-;" 1..•.:;•. ',;l.:.,'l;'r'.;;'ll.'''/ -.;:^ Vehicle Act 198^ ^ienceforth "the Act") for enhancement of :' 't: [ "^ ,^v compensation Ggainst the award dated 29.01.2007, passed by Fifth Additionat Motor Accident Glaim Tribunal, Bilaspur (C(5) (henceforth "the Tribunal") in claim case No.14/2006 whereby a compensation of Rs.30,000/n- hds been awarded. 2) On 15.06.2006 appetloint was travelting in bus bearing registrGtion No.UP-70/R/973g, respondent No.l by driving the said vehicte in a rash and negligent manner caused an accident, vehicle turned turtle, resuttantly, appelianf sustained injuries. Appellotnt filed cxn appliart'ion under Section 166 of the Act for compensation against respondents who are; driver, owner cxnd insurer of the yehicle. Kespondents No.l & 2 remo^ned exparte, whereas respondent No,3 contested the clGim. 3) Learned Tribunal after due enquiry/passed the impugned award and allowed compensation as below (a) Medical expenses (b) For pain &suffering (c) For loss of income <& special dietduring treatment (d) For grievous injury Total Award Rs 12,000/- Rs. 5,000/- Rs.3,QbO/- Rs.10,000/- Rs.30.000/- 4) Heard learned counsel for the appellant. He contended .A; that the Tribunal erred in allowing just and proper compensation to the appellant. '-?•' '' ~ : ' '' • . ' .. ' .'. • • . • :.'^ . • '' . ' ! •. • .. . ; . •- 5) Atth<)ugh AAedical Officer to prove the injury of appellant .^. -\ :.. _• • ..'. has not been e^arrtined by the oppeilant, no disabjtity certificate -:r^: 3 y has been obtained or filed before the Tribunal, yetthe Tribunal sympathetically considered ths matter and allowed compensation Rs.30,000/- on various heads, therefore, the award passed by the Tribunat cannot be defined to be unjust or improper. 6) We are of the considered opinion that there is no illegality or infirmity in the factual findings recorded by the Tribunal which may call for interference by this Court in its appelbte Jurisdiction.The appeal is liabte to be dismissed and it is accordingly dismissed. No costs. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- V.K. Shrivastava Judge M- '' x '\ E...