1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 109 OF 2009 IN TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.46 OF 1996 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 234 OF 1996 Surekha S. Juvekar ...Plaintiff. Vs. Shubhada P. Juvekar S.S.Potdar ...Defendant. Mr. Suresh N. Manoti for the Plaintiff. Mr. N.P. Bedse i/by Mr. P.G. Lad for the Defendant. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 17th November, 2009. P.C.- 1 The parties to exchange draft issues. 2 Considering the averments made, at this stage to avoid further complications in the matter, the Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The parties to consider to appoint the Commissioner to record the evidence. 2 3 Prayer clause (b) can be considered at that stage. 4 The Chamber summons is accordingly, allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)