a IN ThE HIGH CDUT CF VAPNsiTaP A 47 WGMC.RE Dated ti-is U th Day f June 1 98 BEFflE N HOb’sIl HP. JLSTIcL’ 1. VOIIAN flHPR .Pfl PETITIOh tiO.16205/1998 LETWEE?’ 3. Gurumurc.y, 8/0 0. hudiyappa aged 35 years. 0cc” :ursemvloyed. z/o. Santhe ennur ts. Qsarnagiri, himagqa. . . .PETIflCI4EP ( y Sri. Cairih toz in. 4.6. Shnstri ndv.) MD: 1. The .xec tivo hrgare r. OPEC Division Nc.3 Gckak r .tgaa Difl. li-c Presadng (nicer, Aaal. lnbc,ur Oturt ‘lubli. ...ESCTsDflTS y 1. a ?‘.aun. r, n) eaeee ‘I tnt et o a a u •r 4 t 1 2ó & 227 ct the r.st4tution ct Indies dw a nr ar te vie mn—C at. 29..;7 y P—2 E2 C. This Writ Petttion cowinq on for preLtmina’y ar’nJ tn Ca ti-c C.tur na e t e f LW irp— n2 — — / CRDEP The wor’er in esticn w s te rmir att-d from servLe on 26_u8_1n72, He Claims that he NOS workirg as litelate ssistant or a daiV’ aC of sC—UO P iii aje tbot c r a e n li uticr bet re is L 8 k r (ou t fter Siction I 4—s) wee inti caucec into the stat. ce, he oh eec tr at he aflpflaCneo tne authorities tot two or three years saekirg reinstatemeit, 7hjs is the reason jiver 2 bytin or hc no iritad ‘ y. I eLbcur Cot t coroidereo the etion cfl( cami to Us 00 olusion that there ru merit in ens cnc rct there are no jc’od rc’nos tc corocre caThy, The Latout Court octet u tThtt r cc. ojo c a roacbtce on e cc utr ‘. t s re cx n a j ‘ to ns Curt icr aujuoication No re ecu ‘ fortncorriino xci the ctelav, Cci this qrourc3 the Labour court re ecten tne aro.jCaticfl, The saib ‘a i nnraxur —C n clahlerged, 2. 1 have heard Mr. Gins l€arned counsel apneaning for Mr. Vqneshwara Shastri, I do not find any ground to interfere with the award of t1.e Labour Court. The rker was dismissed on 26—08-1978, He shoulc* have made the applica.tion for reference within a reasonable time, Nothing nas been done by the Petitioner with resuect to the d.ismissal till 1988, The whole is sue was raised only beoause Section 10(4—A) was introduced to the statute, Section l0(4A) is for vigilent persons and not for the persons who sleeps over the right. The Labour Court is justified in rejecting the application. Writ Petition dismissed, kso/— bnv/— U r j U,LiLi 2 ;ji