IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA No.3542 of 2010 Date of decision:09.12.2010. Hari Singh and others ...Appellants Versus Haryana State and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Narender Sura, Advocate, for the appellants. Ms. Sushma Chopra, Addl. A.G., Haryana. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the appellants had submitted that the present appeal is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in RFA No.1824 of 2006 titled as “Sudama and others Vs. The State of Haryana and another” decided on 01.10.2010. Notice of motion was issued and on the asking of the Court, notice was accepted by the learned State counsel for the purpose of verifying this fact. Today, learned counsel for the State has made a statement that the statement made by learned counsel for the appellants on the last date of hearing is correct as the case is covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Sudama and others (supra). Hence, the present appeal is also disposed of in terms of the order passed in RFA No.1824 of 2006 titled as “Sudama and others Vs. The State of Haryana and another” decided on 01.10.2010. December 09, 2010 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE