1 wp10424.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10424 OF 2010 _____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________________ Mr. P.N. Kutti, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Patil, Advocate for respondent. 1. Heard Advocate Mr. Kutti for petitioner and Advocate Mr. Patil for respondent. 2. The impugned order does not show any jurisdictional error or perversity. Effort of Mr. Kutti for petitioner is to urge that suit of present nature is not contemplated at all and everything has to be agitated before the Trial Court under the provisions of Hindu Marriage Act. I find that such grievance was not specifically raised before the trial Court. 3. Hence with that liberty to petitioner to move appropriate application before trial Court, present Petition is disposed of. No costs. (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE. 27.01.2011 gas/wp10424.10