1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 26 OF 2011 SYED MUKHTAR ALI SYED MUMTAZ ..VERSUS.. AATIYA KHANUM ISMAIL KHAN AND ANOTHER Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. A. B. Mirza, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. B. M. Khan, Advocate for respondent no.1 Mr. D. B. Yengal, A.P.P. for the respondent no.2. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. DATED : 7 th SEPTEMBER , 2011 . Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Mr. Mirza, the learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to place on record a Pursis dated 07.09.2011, in which it is stated that the applicant and non-applicant no.1 have settled the dispute amicably out of the Court. The pursis is taken on record and marked as “X” for identification. It is further stated in the Pursis that a Pursis dated 25.07.2011 is also filed before the learned Judge, Family Court, Akola by the parties and in view of the settlement between the parties, the revision application may be disposed of. The learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, submits that the applicant is not desirous of prosecuting the revision application and seeks permission to withdraw the application. Permission is granted. 2 The Criminal Revision Application is disposed of as withdrawn. JUDGE Diwale