IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14425 of 2010 1. RAMDEO MANJHI, S/o Jatan Manhi. 2. Jitan Manjhi, S/o Late Mahabir Manjhi. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02. 06.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that there is specific overt act alleged against the petitioner No. 2 of having assaulted the deceased on the neck along with co- accused due to which he died, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner No. 2, Jitan Manjhi. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, with regard to petitioner No. 1 there is no specific overt act, let the petitioner No. 1, Ramdeo Manjhi be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawadah in connection with Kawakole P.S. Case No. 78 of 2000 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be 2 a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)