IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1921 of 2009 CHANDRA BHUSHAN PRASAD YADAV, S/o Sri Nageshwar Rai, R/o Village – Maruahan, P.S. – Sakra, Distt. – Muzaffarpur …………….. Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, through Mr. R.J.M. Pillai, son of Not Known, the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna, Bihar, 2. Mr. Bipin Kumar, son of Not Known, District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, 3. Sri Shailendra Nath, son of Not Known, Block Development Officer, Sakra, Distt. – Muzaffarpur, 4. Smt. Sumitra Devi, Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Katihar, wife of Sri Kishore Rai, R/o Village – Katesar, P.S. – Sakra, Distt. – Muzaffarpur and 5. Sri Vijay Shankar, son of Not Known, Panchayat Sachiv, Gram Panchayat Raj, Katihar, P.S. – Sakra, Distt. – Muzaffarpur …. ………………………………………Contemnor / Opp. Parties. ----------- For the Petitioners: Dr. Maya Nand Jha and Mr. Anil Kumar Roy, Advocates. For the State: Mr. Prassoon Sinha, G.A. III. ----------- 2. 03.02.2010. Heard Mr. Maya Nand Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Prassoon Sinha, learned counsel for the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that the order dated 30.01.2009 passed by the Division Bench in CWJC No. 1480 of 2009 has not yet been complied with. On a perusal of the Annexures it is perceivable that the order has been complied with. 2 It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the order has not been properly complied with. Be that as it may, the same aspect cannot be adverted to in a proceeding for contempt. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, it is open to him to initiate an independent action, as advised in law. With the above observation, the proceeding for contempt stands dropped. Dilip ( Dipak Misra, C.J. ) ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J. )