IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4073 OF 2005 OF MOTION NO. 4073 OF 2005 OF MOTION NO. 4073 OF 2005 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL LODG. NO. 803 OF 2005 LODG. NO. 803 OF 2005 LODG. NO. 803 OF 2005 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 974 OF 1983 NO. 974 OF 1983 NO. 974 OF 1983 G.N. Sainani. ] .. Appellant (Ori.Plaintiff) Versus The New India Assurance Co.Ltd. & Anr. ] .. Respondents (Ori.Defendants) Mr. N.K. Mudnaney for the applicant. Mr. K.J. Presswala i/b M/s. Mulla & Mulla and Cragie Blunt & Caroe for the respondents. CORAM: R.M. LODHA & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 20TH JANUARY, 2006 P.C. : . Heard. 2. For the reasons stated in support of the Notice of Motion, we are satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause in filing the Appeal belatedly. The delay of three days is sufficiently explained. : 2 : 3. We accordingly condone the delay. 4. Office is directed to process the Appeal and post it for admission as soon as numbered. 5. Notice of Motion stands disposed of. [R.M. [R.M. [R.M. LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] [srpasha@hc]