•w's-"';^';^."?""^1?'K- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. /2005 PETITIONERS ..^•''4^ ^••^y >^.---; ^^••' -e ,\ ^ss^- o^--''/ . -•' ^.••- ^\o^~'i' ^e^~ 1. Ram Singh Vishwakanna, S/o. //" Dhan Singh Vishwakarma, Aged about 50 years, R/o. Baniyadih, P.S. Seepat, Tahsil 8s District BUaspur (C.G.) •<^-, ^ w /2. Smt.Tilmati, W/o.Bishahu Sahu, Aged about 55 years, R/o. Mangala, Tahsil & District Bilaspur (C.G.) ,,3. Heera Bai Suryawanshi, W/o. ^lr^pU^ Dayaram Suryawanshi, Aged '^^ &..'-'•' about 60 years, R/o.Mangla, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Bhim Singh, S/o.Vishram Singh, Aged about 50-years, R/o.ViUage Parsada, Post Office Banari, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Principal Secretary, Department of PubUc Works, Mantralaya, D.K.S Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Superintending Engineer, Department of PubUc Works, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. The Executive Engineer, F'ublic Works Department, Sub Division l,28s3 Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. The Sub Divisional Officer, Public Works Department, Sub Division 1,2&3 BUaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ORDER/DIRECTIONS IN NATURE OF WRITS OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR LIKE NATURE The Petitioners most humbly beg to submit as under :- '~~ XI-HC-78 *iwni sfi*<i<ti 3ST ^iww^, »Tf1<l'ie, [sldl^y .^f....^a.oj.^.. ^F[ 200 3TI^?Ttra^ (yi(^a<^T) sn^r^f^ri^ (ISlTSn^Tshtliqi STdTW Hfer 311^1 'hl'qfCT'fl-f K11ClT^'tet^'<R]«K ^ari^TTsn^r 25.8.2006 Shri Abhishek Soni, Adwcat^ for the petitioners. Shri G.K. Beriwal, Dy. Adv. S^neral for the SJate on advonce copy. Heard. The main grievanee of the p^titioners in this petition is thot they have been retired vide .order dated 3p.4.2003 on 'Hie ground that they have completed 30 ye<rs of service. At the outset, lea'ned D iputy i4dvocate Seneral for the Stote submitted that no doifct the petiti^ers are entitted to continue in service iy to attaining the <qe of 60 years. Looking to the limited pn petitioners and submission made by |iyer made by learned counsel •for the learned ttepifly Advocate Seneral for the State, the petition of petitioners fpo.l, 2 A 4 is atlowed and respondents are directed to take them back in servi^e, as they hwe not corapleted 60 years of age so far. Petitioner No.l, 2 &4 ^hall also be entitled for all the salary and dues since the date they were tenni nated. As far as petitioner No.3-H^era Bai Suryawanshi is eoncerned, die is aged about 60 yea-s, as mentioned in the petition, therefore, her petitiwi is dismissed, as she has already attain4d the age of 60 years. It is made clear that or retirement of the petitioners No.l, account of impugned order regarding 2 & 4, if they have been paid any retiral benefits, then they are supposed t(? redeposit the sane with the respondent authorities. With the aforesaid, the peti-tfon stonds disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. .•^-^; Sdl- . _ L.C. Bhadoo judge '—.—^LZ;__