c482 No. 868/2010 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Mr. MK Ray, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Ms. Suman Sharma, Advocate for the respondent no. 2. Heard. Also perused the record. Learned Counsel for the respondent no. 2 raised a preliminary legal objection on the maintainability of the present C482 petition. She submitted that since there is a statutory remedy available to the petitioner to file an appeal before the Sessions Judge against the impugned summoning order passed by the Magistrate, therefore, this petition at the behest of the petitioner is not maintainable. On perusal of Section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, it reveals that against the order passed by the Magistrate, statutory remedy of appeal before the Court of Sessions is provided. But the petitioner, instead of availing the appropriate statutory remedy, has directly approached this Court through this C482 petition. As such, this petition is dismissed as not maintainable. The petitioner is relegated to avail the appropriate remedy by way of filing the appeal before the Court of Sessions, if he so desires. (D.V., J.) 11.11.2010 Prabodh