: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.222 OF 2010 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.292 OF 2010 Madanlal Shyam Bihari Jaiswar .. Appellant V/s. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. J.A. Udaypuri i/b. Mr. V.S. Bhorge for the Appellant. Smt. K.K. Soraan for the Respondent-BMC. Mr. A.M. Kulkarni with Mr. Vaibhav R. Gaikwad for Respondent Nos.3 & 4. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 10 TH MARCH, 2010. P.C.: 1. The Appeal from Order has been preferred against the order dated 11th February, 2010, passed by the City Civil Court, Bombay, in Notice of Motion No.355 of 2010 in L.C. Suit No.357 of 2010, refusing ad-interim relief to the appellant. The appellant contends that he is entitled to continue in the suit structure since it has been in existence and he has been occupying the same prior to 1995. In view of this, it is contended that the City Civil Court, Bombay, ought to have granted ad- : 2 : interim relief directing the respondent-Municipal Corporation not to demolish the suit structure. 2. Admittedly, the area on which the suit structure is situated has been declared a slum and is being redeveloped in accordance with the provisions of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971. It appears that the name of the appellant is not reflected in Annexure-II. It is contended on behalf of the appellant that he is eligible for alternate accommodation and also for inclusion of his name in Annexure-II. 3. In my view, the Suit itself is not maintainable. The appellant may prefer an application before the appropriate authority within a week from today. 4. The appropriate authority will decide the same within a period of four weeks from receipt of such application. : 3 : 5. Till then, the respondent-Municipal Corporation will not demolish the suit structure. 6. In case the application is not preferred within a week from today, the status-quo granted will automatically come to an end. 7. The Appeal from Order is disposed of. 8. In view of the above, Civil Application No.292 of 2010 pending in the Appeal from Order does not survive and the same is dismissed as infructuous.