IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Application No. 573 of 2008 Mahendra Singh and others ….Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. Respondents ………… Mr. B.S. Adhikari, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, learned Brief Holder for the respondent No. 1. Mr. Sachin Pawar, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. H.C. Pathak, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 to 4. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. Compounding Application No. 724 of 2008 This application has been presented by the petitioners and the respondent 2 to 4 and has been signed jointly by the counsel for the aforesaid parties. The application is supported by the affidavits of the petitioner No. 3 and the respondent No. 2. Mr. Sachin Pawar, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. H.C. Pathak, admits about the compromise. Through the aforesaid application, the parties have prayed for compounding. For the reasons stated, the Application is allowed. The offences are compounded. The Criminal Misc. Application No. 573 of 2008 is accordingly allowed and disposed of in terms of the prayer part and with all the consequences. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 05.09.2008 Avneet