BSFORE HON'BLE HIGH COUR.T OF CMMATTISGARH / ^l^—^ l^.-":^^^^' ,AT BILASPUR ^w.^^1," r^.p. "J° ci 2001. ^•: 7.r Petltioners s~ 1 SURE.SH KUMAR VISHWAKA'RMA S/o Shri Gopsljl vishwak£rma, aged about 36.years^ Vo Village Mohlal Tah. & Distt. DURG. (chhattlsgerh) < l^ GAKESH RAM DESHMUKH s/o Shri Dhan "ej Singh Qeshmukh Aged about 42 years^ R/o Yille.ge - Beloudi, Tah. & 'DlStt. DURG (M.P,) VERSUS. Kesppndents s - 1 <. SMt^of_Chhjattl^^^ %rough s Secretary ^ Sahool F<3.ucatlon Department Secretariate^ Ralpur (C»G.) . 2. Dlstrict Educetlon pfficer 'lstrj.cfc - Durg. Durg (C.G.) . SecretarY Education Committee Vidyapeeth ^-e.lviya Nagar, DURG (Ghhafctisgarh). ?u;dha^A ^A.p'^li ^ / '"l ?-e ^y k'.^y-^•^ contd•«2 i»iii|r:i«ir:^i~r:-: ® ^£i^2£lJS^E»«.2EM2lJS£-^^i^32--2£^tle^22^.fcl£^ of Indiae ^^: HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 309 of 2001 Petitiones Suresh Kumar Vishwakarma & another Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & ofhers Sin^e Bench : Hon'bleMr. Justice Satlsh K. Agnihotri. Shri V. G. Tamaskar, Advocate for fhe petitioners, Srat Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govt Advocate for fhe respondents No. 1 & 2, Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Advocate for the Respondent No.3. ORAL ORDER (17^ April, 2006) The following order of fhe Court was passed by ^itisk K. Agniliotri, J. Learaed counsel for fhe petitioxiers, on instruction, subioits that the petitioners do not waat to pursue fhis matter aad seek to wifhdraw fhe petition, to which learaed counsels for fhe respondents have no objectk>n. The petitk>n is disxaissed as withdrawa, No oider as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur