IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1477 of 2008 (M/S) Satya Prakash Kaushal …… Petitioner Versus Smt. Savita Kaushal and another …… Respondents …….. Mr. T.S.Bindra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Alok Singh, Senior Counsel with Ms. Mamta Joshi, Advocate for respondent no. 1. Hon’ble V.K. GUPTA, C. J. Petitioner Satya Prakash present in person along with his learned counsel. After hearing the detailed arguments of the learned counsel for the parties, I feel totally disinclined to interfere with impugned order dated 26.07.2008. The impugned order accordingly is affirmed. Mr. T.S.Bindra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the petitioner himself, who is present in person in Court, have both stated before this Court that the petitioner shall abide by the Court order dated 06.02.2008 passed by the learned Family Court, Dehradun in letter and spirit, of course, without prejudice to the petitioner’s rights and contentions in the pending Appeal in this Court against the said order. According to Mr. Bindra, learned counsel for the petitioner, even though the petitioner shall abide by the aforesaid order dated 06.02.2008 in letter and spirit, such abiding shall be until the aforesaid Appeal in the High Court is disposed of and subject to the result of the said appeal. In the meantime, Mr. Bindra, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the petitioner in person, state, submit and undertake before me to remove the objectionable hoardings. They also submit, state and undertake that they shall not interfere in the functioning or operations of the ‘Wedding Point’, which presently, on the force of the aforesaid order dated 06.02.2008 is being run by respondent no. 1. The petitioner shall not 2 cause any interference in the running of the ‘Wedding Point’ by respondent no. 1. This of course is without prejudice to the petitioner’s ultimate rights and contentions in the aforesaid pending Appeal in the High Court. Mr. Alok Singh, learned Senior Counsel appearing for respondent no. 1 submits before me that respondent no. 1 shall withdraw composite contempt application against the petitioner in which charges under the Contempt of Court Act and under Order 39 Rule 2A of the Code of Civil Procedure are leveled. The petition is disposed of. (V. K. Gupta, C. J.) 22.08.2008 A