IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 15th day of March, 2010 Urgency Application No. 927/2010 Ist Bail Application No. 175 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Rajendra & Ors. .….Applicants (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party ___________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No. 169/2009, U/s 2/3 Gangsters Act, PS Nehru Colony, District Dehradun. _______________________________________________________________ March 15, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Mr. Prem Kaushal, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. Nandan Arya, AGA for the State. In view of the reasons mentioned in the accompanying affidavit, urgency application is allowed. Heard on the bail application of the accused applicant. A gang chart has been annexed as Annexure No. 2 to the bail application, wherein following cases have been shown to be registered against the accused applicant no. 1 Rajendra with PS Nehru Colony, Dehradun: (i) Case Crime No. 114/07 u/s 380/411 IPC (ii) Case Crime No. 129/07 u/s 379/411 IPC (iii) Case Crime No. 133/07 u/s 399/402 IPC (iv) Case Crime No. 134/07 u/s 25/4 Arms Act (v) Case Crime No. 156/09 u/s 454/380/411 IPC (vi) Case Crime No. 157/09 u/s 454/380/411 IPC Following cases have been shown to be registered against the applicant no. 2 Jogendra: (i) Case Crime No. 156/09 u/s 454/380/411 IPC, PS Nehru Colony (ii) Case Crime No. 157/09 u/s 454/380/411 IPC, PS Nehru Colony (iii) Case Crime No. 74/06 u/s 380/411 IPC, PS Basant Vihar. Following cases have been shown to be registered against the applicant no. 3 Yogendra with PS Nehru Colony: (i) Case Crime No. 133/07 u/s 399/402 IPC (ii) Case Crime No. 156/09 u/s 454/380/411 IPC (iii) Case Crime No. 157/09 u/s 454/380/411 IPC Learned Counsel for the accused applicants submitted that all the accused applicants have been granted bail in all the aforesaid cases by the orders of the Court. In support of his submission he has filed the copies of the orders whereby the bail has been granted to the accused applicants in all the aforementioned cases. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicants deserve bail at this stage. Let the applicant Rajendra, Jogendra and Yogendra be released on bail on executing a personal bond by each of them and furnishing of two sureties, each in like amount, by each of them to the satisfaction of Special Judge, UP Gangster & Antisocial Activities (Prohibition) Act, 1986, Dehradun. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 15.3.2010 PRABODH 2