^'\^2^ i ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER ._\." W. P. S. N0. ZJ^^^OF 2010 Pravin Kumar Tiwari son of Shri Bhola / . Shankar Tiwari, aged about-26 years, R/o /o ^ /' » ,o\..<^.-' / Mahalpara, Saraipali, Tahsil- Saraipali ^QF?.^<^\?- Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.). <^.<"^/7\y" .^\b>" ^y^ ^ ONDENTS VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Panchayat and Gramin Welfare Departinent, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Collector, Mahasamund Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.). 3. District .Education Officer, Mahasamund, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.). 4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Mahasamund Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^"""^ ^ f'^£fe..: 1 The petitipnerj-£siiect&-iU^ L XI-HC—78~ ^I^T^T^TW WT ^TI^T sh^icb ^ l^.ld^^—tt^ +. Qx^- <nN^iT ^»*ir<»» "s^ ^ww^, ^\\\ww, [^<nj<H(j,< a.?. P. CSJ ^Jl<' " 2^^S'/t-o •:---"<^200 3H^rITra^ (yii^<^T) I^TTW ^rft<T 3TT^?T SB : HON?BLE BSR. JUSTICE Pfl 09.09.2010 Shri Maxioj Kum.ar Smha, Shri PraveeB. Das, Dy,,G.A] Counsel for the petitione| petitioner is at Seri.al. N0,8 ia tt^e nierit •Mst but ign.ormg his cajididature the persons who w^re at Serial Nos. 11 and 13 have been appoio.ted. He submiil be ser^ed it' the petitioner is petition with Mberty to iiiake j: respoiidenf No.4 aiid ;iii tum directed to decide tiie represei^tation of t3ie petitioiier as expeditiously as possible, State counsel has no| represeiitation is bemg made g] accordaiice with law. Accordn.igly, the petition€{r is pensiitted to withdraw <=M^(^i4ii TrR^?f "^* f^st <F»i^i< ^73ffiW 3TT^T DIWAH.BR ^ounsel for the petitioner.' for fhe Stete, r. subniits tliat though the -s that euds ofjustice would peiTnitted to witlidraw the rop.er representation before fhe said i^spOB.dent be objectio.n if aiiy such [n,d the sam.e is decided io. tliis petition with the aforesaid filiiig representation by tlie petit^ [ibe.r'U7'. I.n fhe ev.entuality of ^ner within a period of tliree weeks 'from. fhe date of receip^ of copy of tli.is order, it is expected irosii fhe competent aufhority to deci.de the same iii accordaiice with law-within a fuilther period ofthree nionfhs. It is nia.de clear that. tliis (p-ourt has not expressed aiiy opmion on'm.eiits of the ca.se d^id tlie authQrity. coB.cenied would be st Itbertv to decide tliel with. law. sam.e strictly io. a.ccordan.ce Sd/- pritinker Diwaker Judge