IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 22020 of 2002 Between: 1 Alasapuri Sandya W/o. Krishna Prasad R/o. Suryapet, Dhanthala Bazar, Nalgonda District. 2 Nookala Shiresha W/o. Krupakar Reddy R/o. Sreeram Nagar Colony, Suryapet, Nalgonda District. 3 Manna Community Hall, Rep. by its Father David, S/o. Danial, Suryapet, Nalgonda District. 4 Kollu Narsi Reddy S/o. Ramaswami Reddy R/o. 1-6-141/34, Sreeram Nagar Colony, Suryapet, Nalgonda District. 5 Kontham Sreenivas Reddy S/o. Narsi Reddy Door No. 1-6-141/29-6, R/o. Sreeram Nagar Colony, Suryapet, Nalgonda District. 6 Yella Rama Rao Choudary S/o. Venkaiah Choudary R/o. 1-6-141/29/6, Sreeram Nagar Colony, Suryapet, Nalgonda District. 7 Sundari Ramakrishna S/o. Gopaiah Suryapet, Nalgonda District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner, Suryapet Municipality, Suryapet, Nalgonda District. 3 The Director of Town Planning, Hyderabad. 4 S.Ranga Reddy S/o. S.Padma Reddy H.No.1-6-141/27/B, Sriramnagar, Suryapet, Nalgonda District. RR 4 to 6 are impleaded as per Court Order in WPMP 8664/03 Dt. 18.6.03 5 A.Jayamma W/o. A.Krishna Murthy H.No.1-7-141, Nalla Baqvi Bazar, Suryapeta, Nalgonda District. RR 4 to 6 are impleaded as per Court Order in WPMP 8664/03 Dt. 18.6.03 6 A.Krishna Murthy S/o. Srisailam H.No.1-7-141, Nalla Baqvi Bazar, Suryapeta, Nalgonda District. RR 4 to 6 are impleaded as per Court Order in WPMP 8664/03 Dt. 18.6.03 7 Nookala Vanaja W/o. Narasimha Reddy R/o. khammam Cross Road, Surypet Nalgonda Dt. RR 7&8 are impl. as per court order dt.30.8.05 WPMP24052/05 8 Sankarishetty Eshwaramma W/o. Veeraiah R/o. 1-2-120 Kudakuda Suryapet. RR 7&8 are impl. as per court order dt.30.8.05 WPMP24052/05 .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari quashing the Notification issued by the Government published in A.P. Gazette dated 13.8.2002 to the extent of the variation to the 50.00 wide Master Plan road in the General Town Planning Scheme (Master Plan) of Suryapet Municipality sanctioned under G.O.Ms.No. 932 M.A., Dated 2.11.1982 and also set aside the consequential G.O.Ms.No.397 M.A., dated 2.9.2002 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.G.SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN. & URBAN DEV. The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 22020 of 2002 ORAL ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioners challenged the validity of the notification dated 13.8.2002 to the extent of the variation to 50 feet wide master plan road in the General Town Planning Scheme notified by the Suryapet Municipality. They have also prayed for quashing of G.O.Ms.No.397 dated 2.9.2002 by which the Government of Andhra Pradesh confirmed the draft variations. At the time of admission of the writ petition, initially there was an interim order dated 5.11.2002 in favour of the petitioners. Subsequently, on a vacate petition moved by the respondent – municipality as well as third parties, the interim order was vacated by order dated 30.8.2005. As against the same, the petitioner carried the matter in appeal -W.A.No.1148 of 2006, which also ended in dismissal by order of the Division Bench dated 13.11.2006. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that in view of the order of the Division Bench in the writ appeal, the writ petition may be closed. In this writ petition the petitioners assailed the draft variation, as confirmed by G.O.Ms.No.397 dated 2.9.2002, to the master plan road in the town of Suryapet Municipality, on the ground that no opportunity was given to them before making the variation. However, from the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents, it is clear that after issuing draft notification, objections were invited and after considering the objections, the variations notified in the draft notification were confirmed by G.O.Ms.No.397 dated 2.9.2002. In that view of the matter and as no other argument is advanced, I do not find any merit in this writ petition. The writ petition is devoid of merits and is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ____________ 16-6-2009 asp