1 ^L-,v.. -/ r3'V.I^-^S^^ •^^y^,, prtise"18" .^-. ,.-• o-^-, Shigte B®r»e?h IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. «~^ W,P(C) No. -Q OF 2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ;Rajendra Prasad Mali, S/o. late Jangali Mali, aged 55 years, Occupation Business, R/o. in front of Jute Mill, Raigarh, Tahsil and District Raigarh (C.G.) Versus :1) Municipal Corporation, Raigarh through its Cominissioner, Municipal Corporation Office, ^-Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) :2) The CoUector, Distiict Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (o •'3?"^ A^ '^.,. fS~.c9!'- PETITIONER RESPONDENTS HIGHCOURT QF CI-fHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETmON (0 No. ^67 OF2011 Rajendra Prasad Mali Versus Municipal Corporation, Rdgarh & Another (Writ Petition under Article 226 of Uie ConsUtution of tndia) Singte Bench: Hon'bfe Shri Satish K. Agrahotri, J. Preserit:- Shri VipinPunjabi, Advocats f6rthe;p^itioner. Shri H.B.Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with R4a. Sareena Khan, Advocate for the respondent No.1, Shri Shashank Thakur, Panet Lawyer for the Stete/ respondent No.2. ORDER(ORAU (Passed on this 11" day of July, 2011) 1. At the very putset, Shri Agrawaf, learned senjor counsel appearmg for the respondent Np.1 and Shri Thahur, leamed counsel appearing Tor the State/respondent No.2, submit that no steps for demolishing the structure on the land in question shall be taken without affording proper opportunity of hearlng to the pet'rtloner. Slnce no notces have been issued till date, thus, at this stage, it is not necassary to go irto further facts of the case. 2. However, it is made clear that the respondent authorities shEll not demoiish any structyre without affording proper opportimity of hearing to the petitioner. 3. Accordingly, the writ petttion stands diaposed of w^th Bie aforesaid observaflons and direction. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^ ashok