IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 202 of 2010 Date of decision : 14.1.2010 Pintu and others ....Petitioners Versus Municipal Committee, Goniana Mandi and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr. Sushant K.Batish, Advocate for the petitioners. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The petitioner has approached the trial Court purely on the basis of family settlement which is yet to be tested in a regular second appeal which is still pending in the High Court. There is no other material to form the basis of the claim. The trial court was right in observing that till the time the regular second appeal is decided, the instant suit cannot be proceeded with and has directed to staying the proceedings. It has also given liberty to the parties to get the matter restored when the regular second appeal is decided. It further observed that as on today only issue No.4-A, which was the matter pertaining to the stay of proceedings, ought to be decided and no other issue should be decided in view of the pendency of the regular second appeal. There is no infirmity in the approach of the learned C.R. No. 202 of 2010 -2- trial court. The impugned order is therefore justifiable in the given set of circumstances. No ground to interfere. Dismissed. 14.1.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss