C-482 No. 12 of 2008 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. By way of this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is facing the trial in Complaint Case No. 3580 of 2006, Virendra Singh Rana Vs Faiyyaj Ali, under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee, District Haridwar challenged the summoning order dated 16.12.2006 as well as aforesaid criminal proceedings initiated against him. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent No. 2 filed the aforesaid complaint before the Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee, District Haridwar alleging therein that the cheque issued by the petitioner to him was dishonoured due to Insufficient Fund. On the basis of that complaint, the learned Magistrate took cognizance against the petitioner vide order dated 16.12.2006 which is under challenged by way of this petition. Heard Sri Shashi Kant Shandilya, learned counsel for the petitioner on the point of admission and perused the record. Having considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the documents filed before me, I am of the view that there is no flagrant injustice and abuse of process of court in this case. The points raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner are the disputed question of facts and they can be judged by the trial court where the evidence is yet to be collected. At this stage, I am not suppose to embark upon an enquiry with regard to the reliability of the evidence which is yet to be adduced before the court during the course of the trial. Any judgment rendered by me would amount to premature judgment where the evidence is still incomplete and hazy. I do not find any merit in this case at this stage. Accordingly, the petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed in-limine. (B.C.K., J.) 07.01.2008 ASWAL