<3•^gs^ ^:^^^:>'^ ;^"!'3p.v-A'"" ^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE<;HHAmSGARH AT BJLASPU.R W. P. N0. /'<?-/ / PETITIONER Versu^ Resoondents ^ 1. ^ ^ ^^ ^^ ^»l o^ •> Vt ^- ^fl^< w^^2^ X/ 2. -4. 5. Anoop Prasad Sahani S/o late Shri M.R.Sahani, Aged about 24 years, R/o Village Cheer Bagicha Bijli Toli Jashpur, Dist : Jashpur-(C.G.) State ofChhattisgarh, Through The Secretary Home Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur-(C.G.) The Inspector General of Police, BUaspur Raage Bilaspur-fC.G.) The Supdt. Of Police Jashpur, Dist : Jashpyr- (C.G.) The Union of India Through - The Secretaiy Department of Human Resource, New Delhi State of Madhya Pradesh Through - The Secretary, Department of Home, Bhopal - (M.P.) WRIT PETmONUNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC.-22 -g^-^dqRTq, ^grepis, Rilni'yy 17 an^?T ^ra? . / , A ; _____M.^;.^.&...i..lL? / ^ c- TOt[?ffcCTW"""""""""""""""""""'"Wt. SII^I^T fe-titi sn^i a>tiict> ^ift'cT (-.,<. ?)- </j /^ 113-1-2006 311^1 TCiIWHf?5T conipassi^aate eariler ordeifs Petitioner by Shii A. N. Pande'! Sfari S.P. Kate, Govt. Advocat^ Wifh consent, heard finally. This case relates to |deatli ofan eniployee semug iu the Leamed coruisel for fhe petit^o: fpf the employee has occurred oa 2- sariier. He further subnuts fhat furtb.er submitted fhat in batch jmvolviag the satae qucstion )20/12/ 2005. He prays that similar| Leamed couusel for ftie Sta^ jstates tfaat the State of Chliattisga^h ;ases of dependants of fhose einp^ §sfricflyia accordaace wifh the policjr In view of fhe subinissions jparties, wifhout expicssiag any jopiaion offhis Court, ends ofjusti<jc jflie State of Chltattisgarh aad the| |decide the case of fhe petitiQner iu| |the tiine of death of the einployee lappointment orders will be issued a( |2006. Tbe petitioner ia also direjc iauthorities. It is luade clear that if jmay avaU. fhe reinedy available Uuc|ei ibefoie this Court. Wifh fhe aforesaid observatiq,i]is Certified copy as perrules. Copy to the State counsel, |order to fhe respondents for coiupli^n ^, Advocate. j, for the State/respoitdents. <»i<ila4i'wrcff'? feczt ^fsR^R ^; aiPnH aii^i appoiattnent consequent upon the ^tate. • tit^oner categorically stated that, fhe deafh 110-1999 i.e. after l-11-1997 aad not his appUcatioa has been rejected. It is iqf cases bearing W.P. No.1322/2002 have been passed by fhis Court on |orders inay'be passed in this case also. (e does not dispute th.e above fact aad ga^-h has taken a decision to consider tfae (oyees who died on or after 1/11/1997 prevaleat at that tune. mbde by learaed counsel appearing for the o^uiion on fhe inerits of fhe case, ia the wiU be served ifa direction is given to authorities conceraed to consider and aecordaace with fhe poUcy preyalent at c^acemed. If fhe petitioner fouiid eligible; early as possible on or before 30til April, :ted to render due co-operation to fhe ^ny grievaace still cemaias, the petitioner jer fhe law includuig ffling of fhe petition Lci,i)iSj this petition-stands disposed of. ^ho will be obUged to eoininunicate the ince. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ['qt^tfisT^-