1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.60 OF 2010. IN WRIT PETITION NO.1501 OF 2009. 1. Smt.Vasantabai W/o Rambhau Ubale and another ... Appellants. Versus Sk.Javed Sk.Khalil ... Respondent. ... Mr.Vivek Bhavthankar, advocate for the appellants. Mr.G.R.Syed, advocate for the Respondent. CORAM : P.V.HARDAS AND : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,JJ. Date : 19.04.2010. PER COURT 1. This letters Patent Appeal filed under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Act, seeks to 2 challenge the order of the learned Single Judge dated 22.6.2009, allowing the petition and directing the trial Court to frame an additional issue in respect of jurisdiction of the Civil Court to entertain the suit. 2. The application filed by the present Respondents for framing additional issue in respect of the Court came to be rejected by the trial Court. The Respondents herein being aggrieved by the said order filed Writ Petition before the learned Single Judge of this Court. The learned Single Judge found sufficient merit in the contention and accordingly allowed the Writ Petition by directing the trial Court to frame additional issue in respect of jurisdiction of the Civil Court to entertain the suit in the light of the averments between the parties in respect of the relationship of landlord and tenant. 3. We have heard Mr.Bhavthankar, learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the Respondent and we have perused the findings 3 recorded by the learned Single Judge. Upon such perusal, we do not notice any perversity in the reasoning of the learned Single Judge to justify any interference in the Letters Patent Appeal. Consequently, there being no merit in the Letters Patent Appeal and the same is summarily dismissed with no order as to costs. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) (P.V.HARDAS,J.) asp/office/LPA60.10