IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 11960 of 2010 Date of decision: 13.09.2010 Anwar Khan ........ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Parminder Singh Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab for the respondent State Mr. Jasbir Rattan, Advocate for the complainant -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel, on instructions from SI-Prem Singh, states that whatever the dowry articles recovered by them, have been handed over to the complainant. However, learned counsel for the complainant states that some of the dowry articles are yet to be recovered from the petitioner. Whether the same are still in possession of the petitioner or not, is a matter of evidence. It is not disputed that the petitioner has since joined the investigation. Accordingly, the order dated 27.04.2010 passed by this Court is made absolute. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge September 13, 2010 mohan