IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35733 of 2010 JEEVAN PASWAN @ KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR 04/ 20.01.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of this application within the course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Mahendia P.S. Case no.65/1999 registered under section 396 of the IPC. Petitioner is not named in the first informant report but it appears from perusal of the impugned order of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge that on 23.7.2001 Investigating Officer filed a petition before the court praying therein to remand the petitioner in the instant case as he was langhishing in judicial custody in connection with Konch P.S. Case no.10/2000 and Bodh Gaya P.S. Case no. 97/2000 but learned counsel for the petitioner points out that no order was passed on the above stated petition and the petitioner was remanded in this case on 17.7.2010. Moreover, learned counsel for the petitioner points out that except confessional statement of the petitioner, there is nothing against him. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions of the parties, petitioner Jeevan Paswan @ Kumar is directed to be released on bail in connection with Mahendia P.S. Case no. 65/1999 on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief - 2 - Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)