6A.cr appr 288­10.doc RMA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 288 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 424 OF 2010 Manoj Madhukar Yadav .. Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. B.G. Tangsali for the Applicant Mr. V.B. Konde-Deshmukh, APP for the State CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J DATE : 9th SEPTEMBER, 2010. P.C.: 1. Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant original accused has been convicted under Sections 304A, 279 and 337 of IPC. The applicant is now seeking bail. 3. Learned advocate for the applicant stated that besides this case, the applicant has a clean record. He further stated that the applicant was on bail during the trial and he has not misused the liberty granted to him. Both these statements have not been controverted by learned APP. Moreover, it is seen that the maximum sentence is 1 6A.cr appr 288­10.doc only for five months and the Revision is not likely to come up for hearing within the said time. Thus, looking to the above facts, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. Hence, the order: O R D E R 1. Applicant Manoj Madhukar Yadav be released on bail in the sum of Rs. 10000/- [Rs. Ten Thousand Only] each with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The Applicant shall report to the concerned Police Station once in three months till disposal of the appeal. 2. Application is allowed in above terms. [SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] 2 6A.cr appr 288­10.doc 3