1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.03.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2731 of 2011 Chinnamathu Naicker ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Karur District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Thogamalai Police Station. 3.Madha Naicker ... Respondents PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the 2nd respondent to grant police protection to the petitioner to maintain the Kovil Veedu as per order dated 01.11.1949 in R.C.No.32 of 1949 on the file of the II Additional First Class Magistrate, Trichy. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Anand Kumar For Respondents : Mr.L.Murugan Govt. Advocate (Crl.side) ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the 2n respondent to grant police protection to the petitioner to maintain the Kovil Veedu as per order dated 01.11.1949 in R.C.No.32 of 1949 on the file of the II Additional First Class Magistrate, Trichy. 2. Heard Mr.J.Anand Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.L.Murugan learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondents 2 and 2/State. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that as per the order dated 01.11.1949 passed by the II Additional I Class Magistrate, Trichy, the possession of one Kovil Veedu in the Bommakkan samy is in favour of the petitioner. He would further submit that all of a sudden during the month of May 2010, the 2nd respondent at the instigation of some of the community members disturbing the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the said Kovil Veedu and threatening the petitioner to leave the said Kovilveedu. He would further submit that the petitioner filed Crl.O.P.No.6963 of 2010 for a relief of not to harass and the same was ordered by this Court on 29.09.2010 and hence, the respondents 2 and 3 hand in clove with each other, interfere with the right of the petitioner to maintain the said Kovilveedu. When the petitioner was approached the 2n respondent to seek protection to maintain the said Kovil Veedu, it was refused to give protection. Hence, the petitioner has come forward with the present petition and therefore, he would request the Court to give police protection to the petitioner to maintain the Kovilveedu as stated above. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4. The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submit that they would give police protection only to the life and limb of the petitioner. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (criminal side), the respondent police is directed to give police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner. 6. With the above said direction, this criminal original petition is ordered accordingly to that extent. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(P&A) /TRUE COPY/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The II Additional I Class Magistrate, Trichy. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Karur District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Thogamalai Police Station. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2731 of 2011 02.03.2011 vsm PA/17.03.2011/2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/