1 UNREPORTED IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.1879 OF 1998. Hitendra Chandanmal Jain, Age 21 years, Occ.business, Partner Navashakti Developers, Tilak Road,Nandurbar, Dist. Dhule. ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra. 2. Director of Town Planning and Valuation, Maharashtra State, Central Building, Pune. 3. Town Planner, Dhule. 4. Nandurbar Municipal Council, Nandurbar, Dist. Dhule, through its Chief Officer. ... Respondents. ... Mr.A.B.Girase, advocate holding for Mr.R.B.Raghuwanshi, advocate for the petitioner. Mrs.R.K.Ladda, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for the State. Mr.L.V.Sangit, advocate instructed by Mr.V.J.Dixit, Sr. Counsel for the Respondent No. 4. ... 2 CORAM : B.R.GAVAI AND : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,JJ. Date : 09.07.2010. ORAL JUDGMENT (Per S.V.Gangapurwala,J.) 1. The present Writ Petition has been filed with a prayer that the Respondent No.4 be directed to take immediate decision on the revised proposal dated 7.4.1998. 2. At the time when the petition was admitted, this Court had passed the order on 11.3.1999 as per minutes of order tendered by the parties. 3. As per said minutes of the order, the petitioner was given liberty to move the proposal to the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 for regularisation of the revised plan and the Respondent No.4 was directed to consider the said proposal on its own merits. 4. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with direction that in the event the 3 proposal is not considered as per said minutes of the order, the same be considered within one month from today. 5. The interim order would operate till the decision of the Respondent No.4 and four (4) weeks further from the date of receipt of the communication of the order in the event the order is against the interest of the petitioner. Rule discharged. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) (B.R.GAVAI,J.) asp/office/wp187998