IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:- THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND JULY 2008 / 11TH ASHADHA 1930 W.A.No.1371 of 2008 ----------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).27913/2006 DATED 06/06/2008 .................... APPELLANT/8TH RESPONDENT:- ----------------------------------------------- T.N.BABU, THEKKUMKATTIL, MEVALLOOR, VELLOOR VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.T.M.MUHAMMED YOUSEFF (SR.) SMT.AYSHA YOUSEFF RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 1 TO 7 & 9:- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. NARAYANAN NAIR, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.R.NARAYANAN NAIR, PERUMPILLIL VEEDU, KALAMPOOR, PIRAVOM. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. 4. DIRECTOR OF MINING AND GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MUVATTUPUZHA. 6. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIGILANCE & ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU, ERNAKULAM. W.A.NO.1371 OF 2008 - 2 - 7. PIRAVAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, PIRAVAM. 8. GEOLOGIST, MINING AND GEOLOGICAL DEPARTMENT, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM. 9. SURESH BABU, VELIYATH HOUSE, ATHANI P.O., NEDUMBASSERY. R1 BY ADV.SRI.PEEYUS A. KOTTAM. R2 TO R6 & R8 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.MEERA. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.Dattu,C.J. & A.K.Basheer, J. --------------------------------------------- W.A.No.1371 of 2008 ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 2nd day of July, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu,C.J. This Writ Appeal is directed against the orders passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C).No.27913 of 2006 dated 6.6.2008. 2. By the impugned order, the learned Single Judge has only set aside Exhibit P9 order passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer and, further, has directed him to reconsider the matter in the light of the materials available and with due notice to the petitioner as well as respondents 8 and 9 in the writ petition. 3. Since the matter has been remanded to the Revenue Divisional Officer for fresh consideration and decision, in our opinion, we need not have to entertain this Writ Appeal. Therefore, the Writ Appeal requires to be rejected and it is rejected. Ordered accordingly. H.L.Dattu Chief Justice A.K.Basheer Judge vku/-