IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3609 of 2009 ANIL KUMAR SINGH, son of late Balram Singh, resident of Mohalla B.F.Parisar, Rajput Tola, P.S. Banmankhi, District Purnia, at present working as a Headmaster Pannalal Baidh Girls Middle School, Banmankhi, Purnea … Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Commissioner cum Secretary, Department of Secondary Primary Education, Bihar, Patna 2. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna 3. The District Magistrate, Purnea 4. Shri Harihar Nath Jha, son of not known, present posted as District Superintendent of Education, Purnea 5. Sri Kanhaiya Lal Sinha, son of not known, at present posted as Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Purnea … Respondents. ----------- 2. 23.6.2010 No one appears for the petitioner. Counsel for the State Bank of India is present. For removal of defects this Court has gone into the order of this Court dated 19.3.2008 in C.W.J.C.No. 12656/2005 directing only the refund of the amount of commission allegedly deducted from the salary of the petitioner. In the show cause filed by O.P.No.5, the Bank Official, it has been stated as follows: “5. That in light of the order passed by the Hon’ble Judge on 21st March, 2008, the petitioner filed a representation before the DSE Purnea on 4th March, 2009 in which he claimed the refund of the 2 amount to the tune of Rs. 18,555/- A copy of this letter was also sent to the Bank. 6. That on receipt of the said representation, the DSE, Purnea vide his letter no. 963 dated 21st April, 2009 advised the State Bank of India Purnea Branch, Purnea to refund the entire amount to the Principal, Middle School, Banmankhi which had been deducted by way of Draft commission while issuing the Bank’s draft to the petitioner. 7. That after receipt of the advise of the DSE, Purnea, the SBI, Purnea Branch has refunded the amount of Rs. 18,555=00 to the DSE, Purnea payable to the petitioner by way of Bankers Cheque No. 114839 dated 9th December, 2009 being enclosed with the Bank’s letter no. 107 dated 9th December, 2009 which was deducted towards the draft commission for preparation of the Bank draft. It shall be relevant to state herein that the aforesaid amount has been received by the DSE, Purnea on 10th December, 2009.” Inasmuch as the aforementioned statement in the show cause reply of O.P.No.5 would go to show that the order of 3 this Court has been substantially complied, there would be no need to continue with this contempt application. That being so, this contempt application is dismissed as having become infructuous. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/