IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5780 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 08.10.2009 Anuj Kumar and others .....Petitioners versus Aman Gupta .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Pravindra Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed by the defendants against the order dated 20.8.2009, whereby an application moved by them for framing an additional issue has been dismissed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Karnal, after observing as follows:- “ I find force in the arguments raised by learned counsel for the plaintiff. The plaintiff has not denied the existence of a Will dated 9.3.2000. However, validity of its execution is in dispute. If an additional issue as pleaded by learned counsel for plaintiff is allowed, it would tantamount to changing the nature of the suit.” C.R. No.5780 of 2009 (O&M) 2 The approach adopted by the learned Civil Court is in consonance with the settled law that no issue is required to be framed with regard to the admitted facts. No interference with the impugned order is called for by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. Dismissed. 08-10-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE