CRM-M No.366 of 2011 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CRM-M No.366 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.02.2011 Virender and another ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Gorakh Nath, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana for the State. ... Alok Singh, J (Oral). This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.172 dated 20.10.2009 under Sections 148/149/332/353/290/291/341 and 307 read with Section 34 IPC and Section 3 of PPD Act, P.S. Nangal Chaudhary, District Mahendergarh. This Court on 1.2.2011 has passed the following order:- “While handing over the photographs of the petitioners to the learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, learned counsel for the petitioners has vehemently argued that the petitioners CRM-M No.366 of 2011 2 were not present on the spot and they are not seen in the videography. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana states that he shall personally see the videography, which is with the Investigating Officer, who is present in person in the Court, to find out as to whether the petitioners were present on the spot in the videography.” Learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, on the instructions of ASI Anand Parkash has stated that in the film videographed, identity of the petitioners – accused could not be established beyond doubt. He has also stated that challan in this case has already been submitted before the competent Court. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, present petition is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners, they shall be released on bail by the Investigating Officer on furnishing their personal bonds and one surety each to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer, subject to the limitations provided under Section 438 (2) of the Code. Petitioners – accused shall participate in the investigation as and when they are required. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 09.02.2011 sk.