^s IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION(C.) No.^l^ /2010 PETITIONERS o ^o--" ^•v"^ v^v^ p^GS^""' ^6^-" ^^:-r^(^ •^^v 1. Tayyab Ahsari, Son of Shri Rais Ansari, aged about 22 years, R/o. Kusini, District Surguja (C.G.), Gulshan @ Rajkumari D/o. Bishun, aged about 18 years, R/o. Phuljhar, P.S. Sanna, District Jashpur (C.G.) 2. VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.), ^ 2. The Superintendent of Police, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.), ^ ^ . ' . . 3. Station House Officer, Police Station Sanna, District Jashpur (C.G.), 4. Station House Officer, P.S. Kusmi, Distnct Surguja (C.G.), 5. Bishun Ram Son of Mitku Ram, aged about 60 years, Occupation Agriculturist, R/o. Phuljhar, P.S. Sanna, District Jashpur (C.G.) :ia '1;il •ill (31 a s^ N11 !'•. •II I. 6 M lil WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1.^ IIIf li HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITSON (C) N0. €149OF 2010 Petitjoners Tayyab Ansari & Another Versus Resoondents The State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) ^ Present:- Ms. Hamida Siddiqui, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri A.V.Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORALt (Passed on 07th day of December, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petttioners submits that the petitioners have no threat at present and as such nothing remains in the petition for adjudication. 2. Having regard to the facts situation of the case, however, if in future, there is some threat or action against the petitioners, they may be granted liberty to take appropriate steps. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed, as having become infructuous. 8d/- SatishK.Agnillotn Judge ashok