IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4815 of 2008 1.SURAJ KUMAR, SON OF LATE AM NARAYAN RAM, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA MAHMUDI CHAK RAJENDRA NAGAR, P.S. KADAMKUAN, DISTRICT PATNA 2.ASHWINI KUMAR AMBASTHA, SON OF LATE CHANDRIKA PRASAD, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA S.R.T. 27, RAJENDRA NAGAR, P.S. KADAMKUAN, DISTRICT PATNA--------------------------------------PETITIONERS Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR 2.PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH ITS TOWN COMMISSIONER AT HAVING ITS OFFICE NEAR G.P.O. GOLAMBER, PATNA 3.TOWN COMMISSIONER, PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION NEAR G.P.O. GOLAMBER 4.PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MAURYA LOK BRANCH THROUGH ITS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER HAVING ITS OFFICE AT MAURYA LOK COMPLEX, PATNA 5.ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, MAURYA LOK BRANCH, PATNA KLMUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MAURYA LOK COMPLEX, PATNA --RESPONDENTS ----------- 3. 21.4.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and for the Patna Municipal Corporation. The petitioners have approached this Court for quashing the order dated 29.2.2008 (Annexure-1) issued by the Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation by which he had cancelled the earlier order dated 5.9.2007 passed by the Municipal Commissioner. By the order dated 5.9.2007 the order dated 5.4.2002 had been cancelled and the office orders of the appointment of the petitioners on Class III post had been revived. The effect of the impugned 2 order is that the petitioners have again been reverted to Class IV post. In the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent-Corporation, it is stated that the impugned order dated 29.2.2008 has been cancelled and the office order dated 5.9.2007 has been revived. In the above circumstances, the writ application has become infructuous. It is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. (Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.) Spal/