IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.21804 of 2006 Between: Sangam Roadways, Fleet Owners & Transport Contractor & Forwarding & Agent Kedia Office Situated at 22/7/270, Diwan Devidi, Room No. B-2, Hyderabad - 500 002. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House Officer, Toopran Police Station, Toopran, Medak District. 2 The Station House Officer, Pet Basheerabad Police Station, Ranga Reddy District. 3 Indore Agra Roadways, Rep by its Proprietor Yogesh Sharma, S/o. Not Known to the petitioner Office situated at Shop No. 16, 1st Floor, Kavi Complex, Near Horkicks Factory, Kompally Village, Qutbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 4 Kishan Kumar, S/o. Balbir Singh, Jadishpur Village, Sonipat, Haaryanastate, Qutbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 5 Sudheer Kumar, S/o. Not Known to the petitioner C/o. Indore Ara Roadways, aged about Major, Driving License No. 1795/JKL/2008, R/o. C/o. Owner of the Lorry Address .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.J.P.SRIKANTH Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2: AGP FOR HOME Counsel for Respondent Nos.3 to 5: ----- The Court made the following : ORDER: In this Writ Petition, the grievance of the petitioner is that respondent Nos.1 and 2 failed to cause proper investigation and complete the same in Crime No.180 of 2006 of Pet Basheerabad Police Station, Ranga Reddy District. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submitted that the complaint was investigated into and the final report, under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, was filed before the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Gajwel, on 02-11- 2007, reporting the case as ‘undetectable’. The learned Assistant Government Pleader also furnished a copy of Notice, dated 28-12-2007, served on the petitioner. In view of the fact that the Police filed a final report after completion of investigation, the Writ Petition has become infructuous and the same is, accordingly, dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file a protest petition before the jurisdictional Magistrate. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, W.P.M.P.No.27660 of 2006 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 3rd July, 2009 lur