IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-35214 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 02, 2011 Rajinder Singh. …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana. … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. B.S. Chahar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana, for the respondent-State. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) This is an application seeking regular bail in case FIR No. 166, dated 21.04.2010, under Sections 302 / 307 / 395 / 397 / 435 / 436 / 449 / 450 / 452 / 427 / 323 / 148 / 149 / 120-B IPC and Section 3(i) SC/ST Act, 1989 registered at Police Station Narnaund, District Hisar. Learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, has stated that now trial is pending before the Delhi Court CRM M-35214 of 2010 pursuant to the transfer order passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court, hence, it would not be appropriate for this Court to enlarge the petitioner on bail during the pendency of the trial before the Delhi Court. Learned Deputy Advocate General has further argued that otherwise also, petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 302 / 307 / 395 / 397 / 435 / 436 / 449 / 450 / 452 / 427 / 323 / 148 / 149 / 120-B IPC and Section 3(i) SC/ST Act, 1989, in a famous Mirachpur episode in which two Dalits were murdered and house of the Dalits were set on fire. Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Dismissed. February 02, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2