(^-^ &^ s° SlngleBench IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUbICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.&.} WRIT PETETCON (5)^0.31^^ OF 2011 PETITIONERS : 1. ,^ '• M^ (vsf /"(^' /^ /\ /^ // ./ ^ / ^y/<< <^/ ^ RESPONDENTS : ^lk^ y^^ ^. <?° \. R. C. Verma S/o. Late Shri L. P. Verma , aged about 57 Years, Posted as Assistant Conservator of Forest at the office of Superintendent Gomarda Wild life Sanctuary, Sarangarh. Distt.- Raigarh (C.G.) T. B. Singh S/o. Shri Chandradeo Singh . aged about 58 years . posted as superintendent Seeta Nadi Century Nagari. Distt.- Dhamtari (C.6.) VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Forest Department , D.K,S. Bhawan Raipur (C.6.) 2. Secretary Finance Department fiovernment of Chhattisgarh Raipur, Distt- Raipur (C.G.) 3. Chief Conservator of Chhattisgarh Raipur ( C.G.) Forest ^^ WRIT PETCTEON UNDER ARTCCLE 226 OF THE CONSTCTUTION OF INblA FOR ISSUEANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT. } o c. o ^^a ^M^^^ U o ^ COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT (Hon,'IVI^ Jystice Pritinker Diwaker) W.P.(S)No.3139of2011 Petitioners R»C.Verma and another VERSUS Respondents State of Chnattisgarh and oth.ers Present Dr. Sanjeet petitioner. Shri N. Naha Roy, PL for the State. Sharma, counse! for the O RD E R (18.09.2011) The grievance of the petitioners m the present petition is that after being promoted, though they are workjng as Asslstant Conservators of Forest, they have not been given the salary of the post. 2. Further contention of the petitioners Is that pursuant to the order dated 25.10.2010 passed by this Court, fhe petltioners have agaln ma.de representations on 08J1201.0'and 16J 2,201 OaJong with the copy ofthe order passed by this Court but tsl! date, no orders have been passed by respondent No.1. He submits that time iimlt be fixed for the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioners. 3. Learned State counsel submits that in ai! fairness the representation of the petitioners should have been decided by the competent authority and orders of thjs Court shouid have been .complied with. He further submits that a fixed tlme period be granted to the respondents to decide the representatlon of the petltioners and the petitioners be directed to make a fres-h representatlon. 4. The present petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to file a fresh representation before respondent No.1 wlthln t^vo weeks from today and in the eventuaiity of fjiing of any such representation, the same would be decided within further two months. Non-compliance of thls order would be vlewed seriousiy by this Court. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge