( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 322 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7432 OF 2007 Dnyanoba s/o. Wamanrao Tekale & anr. .. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents Shri P.G. Rodge,Advocate for the petitioners. Shri D.V. Tele, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : P.R. BORKAR,J. DATED : 14.08.2009 P.C. :- 1. Heard Adv. Shri P.G. Rodge for the petitioners and A.G.P. Shri D.V. Tele for the respondent – State. The learned advocate for the petitioners has drawn my attention to last para of order dated 19th December, 2007, passed in Writ Petition No. 7433 of 2007 and para 6 of order dated 21st November, 2007, passed in Writ Petition No. 6415 of 2007. Both the orders are to be read together. It is clear from the said orders that the respondents were asked to enter name ( 2 ) of the petitioners in the list of staff of the schools to be absorbed as surplus in accordance with Rule 25A of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Rules, 1981, as directed by the School Tribunal and also consider the petitioners for absorption as and when vacancy arises. As per reply affidavit filed, name of respondent is taken on waiting list and thus there is obedience of the direction of the Court. 2. At this stage Adv. Shri Rodge submitted that the School was aided school, whereas A.G.P. disputed said position by filing reply. In any case, this court is concerned with the contempt petition and it is seen that the direction as stated above is complied with. 3. In this view of the matter this Contempt Petition is dismissed. [P.R. BORKAR,J.] snk/2009/AUG09/cp322.08