IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 66 OF 2008 RAMDAS GUNO FOL DESAI ALIAS RAMDAS BABANI FOL DESAI ... Petitioner Versus SHRI. JANU THULO VELIP AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. M. B. Da Costa, Senior Advocate with Mr. J. Abreu Lobo, Advocate for the Petitioner. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 25th February, 2008 P.C.: Heard Shri M.B. Da Costa, the learned Senior Counsel on behalf of the petitioner/plaintiff, whose application for amendment has been rejected by the trial Court by order dated 6/12/2007. 2. Although an amendment of the nature sought to be made ought to have been liberally granted, the fact remains that by refusal, no injustice would be caused to the plaintiff, since the dispute between both the parties, either before or after amendment would have been restricted to Survey No. 25/1 of Village Quepem. 3. In my view, this is not a fit case for interference in extraordinary jurisdiction, in the light of what has been stated by the Apex Court in the case of Surya Dev Rai V/s. Ram Chander Rai & Ors. (2003 (6) SCC 675). Petition dismissed in limine. N. A. BRITTO, J. NH