2% A$sistmnt wamissioner oi RN11 esa Tam {Nmmsstw Gammionen M amencial Tag) w THE HIGH §OI¥RT OF WEIGATEIRE AT JABNIWR Wep. NGQ§( Cl é ~ [9? 1. ‘ a “William aws and Go‘a" q9°too u9a8!3 Ines») why; Ltwwz mum ‘ through mitemter M g no Gum New azh.7Vaamn&m& Builéing 2/1; $11ara'd Em Road 4th “Elbow: ‘Blacxk $333 Galautta é 39 M. L. my“ €Df§bc . 16.3 commity men ea Vaémlt Em: H Vasmat Vihawér New mama. $Ver$kl3¢fb v Adaitianal mmsaanen of sales; Tm . . .‘& Resgmmenta (New Edd.“ amissianer of Gammexaial Twg} 3walpmn 3&WI (Mt P) 3331K ‘ww Tm Mfim § i (Nawq Wenmial: Ta§:€m€£1cen) mm ($49? ETETI®N I WEER ARTIGLE n 2% ‘ 9F THE \ GQNSTITUTI® 9E7 INEIA‘rFQR ~ ISSHEN¢E @E‘ ‘ RPPRQPRIW ‘ WRIT ‘ ~ IN > THE NWRE‘QE €ERTI®RARI>0R THE hm W P 2” EI WGH COUR'X' OF CHHAYQSGARH AT BELASPUR WRET PETE’HON No. 5196 of 19§7 PETITIONER : M/s. Wimam Jacks & C0. (1mi) ?Vt. Ltd. Bhilai 8: Anoiher. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : Additiogal Commigsioner of Sales Tax Jaba1pu1' & Oth'srS. ' 5 PETETF‘N UNDER ARTICLE 227/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 3%: Hoaab’ie Smi Satish K. At:n1i’3mtrL J. 6 231‘esent N one fsr the petitioner. Shri NNRG}; ‘32me1 Laxwar fer {1m Staiex’yeSpondentg. Ux®h1{ ORAL) (Passed 3n 28‘“ éay of Octcbe-r, 2919) The mamar is caiied for hearing. None appears nor is any representation made on 'behaif of me petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. 111 View of the above: the matter is dismissed for want of prosecutioii. ? Registry is éii‘ectect to senc’i a copy of this order to the oetitionei‘s, forthwith, My Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri . JUdQ¢., i , , ,