g^fdoZ- IN. THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR IC.Cr.) CS3 • W.P. No 5~^^° /2006 i.''. ..•• \'k4sy ..-'t.'-r' / ^v^y ^••^&'' /^^y ^P''...*'" 7 ^/ ' ff RBWONDENTS: . R.K. BanLS/o- Sbri L. Bani/ Aged about 40 years, worteing as Tracer in the offiee of Assistant Commissioner Tribal Develogtnerlt, Durg R/o. Subhash Nagar Durg District- Durg (C.G.) ^ jcP^,^ ^ll^ •^^ '^^%/\ ,/;pFyftrARNft ^', ' VERSUS 1. State ofChhattisgarh Through'the Secretary' 1 Deparfment of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe.s Develcipmcnt D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur' • '.(C.G.)-'. • 11;' . '.V1'' -. :::-lly1:'; 2. CommissiOner, Schedule Caste artd " Scheduled Tribes Development , Chhattisgarh R.S. Univergity Campus Raipur (C.G.) 3. Collector,, . , : !;. DistrictDurg (C.G.) 4) AssistantComniisSiOEter^ : : , Scheduled Tribes DeYelopmetlt Durg tC.G.) 11. : 1.-, -, '. ' ::. ^ *s; ^BTimtiN UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUtlON ^S^y OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WR!TS_OF MANiDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHERSUITABl.E VftaiTS AND DIftECTIONS:- C-22 sn^rq^ R-fi+sn^r Sbll'shBl?^ Sbll'sh ^ TS^^IWIdit, e»T(i«'ls,Rti'liuy 3Ti^?r qslth TTtcrT iStllth_.^..^'..v='.^010^ ra7"yM"k—"""""wi; 200 fa<>«d s. Shri Jitendra PaM, couut ShriV.V.S.Mm-fhy, Dy| Agrawal, Govt. Advocate for| Heard on adiuissioa andl Petitioner has challeneel has been placed luider suspe| Pradesh Civil Services {Classiticatioii 1966 (hencefoi-fh, "the Rules"'!.! Rule 9, as a whole aftei scheine reRardtng placiltg a ao' and its revocation. Here ia order, ia detaU fhe reasons aiid ifwifhia fhe preseribed pc article of charge and other d< appropriate authority- for revoc unpugned order does not caU Therefore, fhe petition deserve; <tiwf<-f41-i tiit<<-iTffteA<l»it<i< ^;3ri^ff3n^?r :1 for the petitioner. Advocate General with Stui Saajay aB the respondents. M.W.P.No.4135/2006. 1 the impugned.order by which he ision under Rule 9 of the Madhva i, CoQtrol and Appeal) Rules, ainendiuent prescribes a coniplete ^eniinent seivaat under siispension, 1|he instant case, iii fhe suspension f3r suspension bave been assigned pelriod petitioner is not provided wifh lcutaents, he is at liberh' to niove •fction oflus suspension. For the foregoiag reasotis. ! am of the opiaion that tlie for aav interference at this staee. to be disinissed suinniarilv aad is accordiagly disniissed. (tft^y^) ^o XI-HC-22 SfI^rqiT R-ii+sn^T SW (l)^(T SWItl raiu SSf •^WId'y, l9Tn<rl'IS, Rl<"1l<iy 3TT^?T Ma<t» twni shiich fl^ 200 R<>«d 3TI^?T6WliSITHf?cT z In view of the above oidl 10195/2006 for Ustmg fhe 10204/2006 for urgent he; disposed of. *i<iFct41-) w^V ff teA <Ri+ti<. ^iail^irsn^r ;r, M.W.P.No/4135/2006 aiid I.A.No. ase ia DiwaU HoUdays and I.A.No. nag/out of tiu-n h^aiiag _staad Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge (ift^^^)