C.R. No. 31 of 2010 1.7.2010 Present:- Mr. R.P.Singh, counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, counsel for respondents No. 1 to 3. The petitioners had filed two applications in the Court below one for proving the document mark ‘X’ prepared by Junior Engineer working in the office of Block Development Officer, Una and certified copy of judgment dated 30.8.2007. The court below has rejected the applications on the ground that petitioners were already aware of the document mark ‘X’ and, therefore, it should have been proved when the evidence was led. In so far as placing on record judgment dated 30.8.2007 is concerned, the learned Court below has rejected the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners in the court below for placing that judgment on record on the ground that the said judgment is not relevant for adjudicating the dispute between the parties. 2. The document mark ‘X’ is already on record. The petitioners want to prove this document by examining the Junior Engineer from the office of Block Development Officer, Una, who has actually prepared the document. This document is already on record, therefore, it will not cause any prejudice to the respondents in case this document is allowed to be proved through Junior Engineer, who prepared the said document. In so far as judgment dated 30.8.2007 is concerned, it is a judgment of the court and its evidentiary value will be seen by the court below at the time of final adjudication of the dispute. In these - 2 - circumstances, the impugned order dated 6.3.2010 is set-aside and both the applications are allowed. The parties through their counsel are directed to appear before the Court below on 31.7.2010. CMP No. 231 of 2010 Infructuous. July 1, 2010 ( Kuldip Singh ) (GR) Judge.