1 wp708.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.708 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4414 OF 2010 _________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Court's or Judge's Orders Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Coram : Smt. Nishita Mhatre & orders or | Shri M.T. Joshi, JJ. directions and | Date : 7th June, 2011 Registrar's orders | _________________________________________________________________________________ Shri D.P. Palodkar, Advocate for petitioner. Shri N.B. Patil, A. G.P. for respondent no.1. Shri M.A. Deshpande, Advocate for respondent no.2. ..... 1. The petitioner has approached this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the respondent-Corporation to take action against the newly added respondent nos. 4 and 5, who, according to the petitioner, have illegally and unauthorisedly constructed a structure on the City survey no. 20773, Times Colony, Katkat Gate, Aurangabad. 2. By the order dated 17th February, 2010, this Court had noticed a report submitted by the Commissioner, Aurangabad Municipal Corporation dated 15th February, 2010. The Corporation had by that report rejected applications for regularization filed by Shaikh Riyaz Shaikh Salimuddin, as well as Mohd. Abdul Jalil 2 wp708.10 Siddiqui. Since these persons had not received a copy of the report, the learned Advocate for the Corporation was directed to serve them with a copy of the order passed on the regularization applications. The Court then permitted these parties to take appropriate proceedings, as advised, in respect of the rejection of their applications for regularization of their structures. It appears that these parties i.e. respondent nos. 4 and 5 had filed an appeal before the State Government. The State Government has rejected that appeal by an order dated 14th February, 2011. 3. In our opinion, therefore, the relief sought in the present Petition has been granted. It is expected that since the appeal has been decided, the Corporation will take necessary action in accordance with law against respondent nos. 4 and 5. Petition disposed of, accordingly. 4. In view of the disposal of the Writ Petition itself, the Civil Application is also disposed of. ( M. T. JOSHI, J. ) (NISHITA MHATRE, J.) ga s/wp708.10