IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3215 of 2009 ARUN KUMAR SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ----------- 4 25.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Just because the contempt application is being disposed of it does not mean that the opposite parties are absolved of their liability or responsibility to pay salary for the period the petitioner was made to supersaturate at the age of 58 and then allowed to rejoin and retire at the age of 60. The Court is willing to consider the request of opposite parties on this ground that necessary allocation of fund has not been made by the State Government and that some issues arising out of the writ application has travelled to Hon’ble Supreme Court. Either of the two issues being decided first, the petitioner must be paid the arrears of salary for the period in question, which is if the fund is released by the government or the issue gets decided by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. This contempt application is disposed of with the above direction. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)