IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1362 of 2009 1. MOST. SHAHZADI KHATOON W/O LATE MD. ALI R/O MOHALLA- BARAHPURA, P.S.- KOTWALI NOW ISHAKCHAK AND DISTT.- BHAGALPUR 2. RESHMA KHATOON D/O LATE MD. ALI R/O MOHALLA- BARAHPURA, P.S.- KOTWALI NOW ISHAKCHAK AND DISTT.- BHAGALPUR 3. SABIHA KHATOON D/O LATE MD. ALI R/O MOHALLA- BARAHPURA, P.S.- KOTWALI NOW ISHAKCHAK AND DISTT.- BHAGALPUR 4. KASHMIRI KHATOON @ NAGHMA KHATOON D/O LATE MD. ALI R/O MOHALLA- BARAHPURA, P.S.- KOTWALI NOW ISHAKCHAK AND DISTT.- BHAGALPUR --------------Appellants. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. D.M. BHAGALPUR 3. C.S. BHAGALPUR 4. A.C.M.O. BHAGALPUR 5. A.D.M. LEGAL SECTION D.M. OFFICE BHAGALPUR 6. MOST. SHAIYAD KHATUN W/O MD. NIZAM VILL./MOHALLA- BARAHPURA, P.S.- KOTWALI NOW ISHAKCHAK, DISTT.- BHAGALPUR--------------------Respondents. ----------- 7. 2.12.2010 Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and taking into account that I.A. no.3463 of 2010 has been filed by four persons for being impleaded as a party and also being given leave to pursue their present appeal, we are of the considered opinion that since appelllant no.1 Mosst. Shahadi Khatoon, being the mother of the deceased employee, does not fall within the category of dependant who can be employed under the Government policy we are not inclined to grant such leave for filing appeal against the impugned order. As a matter of fact, learned single Judge has correctly held that the Respondent no.6, the wife also cannot be appointed on compassionate ground for the present in the light of the following consideration and decision taken by the District Compassionate Appointment Committee in its meeting held on 19.2.2010. 2 Þ22- Jherh 'kS;knk [kkrqu ifr Lo0 futke pkyd ftyk izfrj{k.k dk;kZy; vlSfud 'kY; fpfdRld lg eq[; fpfdRlk inkf/kdkjh Hkkxyiqj e`rd dh iRuh ,oa ekrk ds chp vuqdEik ds ykHk dks ysdj fookn gksus ds dkj.k lh0MCyw0ts0lh0 okn la0 6337@09 nkf[ky gqvk FkkA ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; }kjk iRuh ds vuqdEik ykHk ij fopkj djus dk vkns” fn;k x;k gSA ijUrq eqrd dh iRuh vius gh ifr ds gR;k ds lansg esa vizkFkfedh vfHk;qDr gSA bl rF; ds vkyksd esa bl dk;kZy; ds i=kad 233 iz0] fnukad 06-11-09 }kjk dkfeZd ,oa iz”klfud lq/kkju foHkkx ds funs” dh ek¡x dh xbZA foHkkxh; i=kad 13293 fnukad 5-10-91 dh dafMdk 2 ds vkyksd dkjZokbZ djus dk funs” izkIr gqvk gS] ftlesa dgk x;k gS fd ;fn vkosnd dks fdlh laKs; vijk/k ds vizjk/kh ds :i esa U;wure 6 ekg dh dkjkokl dk n.M gqvk gks] ,oa ,slk eqdnek fopkjk/khu gks ftuesa e`R;q n.M vFkok 7 o"kZ ls vf/kd dkjkokl fn;s tkus dh laHkkouk 3 gks ;k okn ds fuLrkj ds gksus ij 6 ekg vFkok mlesa esa vf/kd dk n.M gqvk gks] rks oSls vkosnd dk p;u ugha gks ldrk gSA pwfd vkosfndk ds fo:) pktZ”hV nkf[ky gks pqdk gS vr% mudk nkok fu;ekuqlkj fopkj ;ksX; ugha ik;k x;kA ;fn la{ke U;k;ky; }kjk Hkfo"; esa buds laca/k esa dksbZ vkns” ikfjr gksxk] rks vkns” dh izd`fr ds vk/kkj ij buds ekeys esa iqu% fu.kZ; fy;k tk,xkAÞ In that view of the matter, we are of the view that this appeal even otherwise cannot be pursued as the order of the learned single Judge has been complied with. On recording the aforementioned decision, we dismiss I.A. no.3463 of 2010 and consequently the appeal is also dismissed. Sudip ( T. Meena Kumari, J.) ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J. )