1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi WRIT PETITION NO. 955 OF 2010. Rajendra Sharma & Anr. ..Petitioners. v/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. .... Mr. Y.R. Naik, i/b. Mr. Prashant Naik, for Petitioners. Mr. A.S. Desai, a/w. Mr. R.S. Ghadge, for Respondent Nos. 6 to 14. .... CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 8TH JULY 2010. P.C. Petitioners are allowed to carry out amendments to the extent of incorporating the name of Narayan Prabhakar Rao as Petitioner no.3 to the Petition and to correct the name of Respondent no.13. Amendments to be carried out in the course of the day. 2. The learned Advocates appearing for the Petitioners as well as Respondent nos. 6 to 14 have tendered the consent terms executed by and between their respective clients. They have submitted that the consent terms be taken on record and the Writ Petition be disposed of in terms of the consent terms. 3. The consent terms are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. The undertakings given in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the consent terms are accepted. 4. Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the consent terms marked ‘X’. [ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ]