IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18314 of 2008 MUKESH PRASAD @ KARU @ KARUYA @M KAMLESH MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 05/08/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State. The case has been lodged under sections 386, 302/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code against six named accused persons, namely, Satyendra Kumar, Ranjit Mahto, Karuya, Gerua, Mukesh Mahto, Puspanjay and Manjil . Allegation is that Mukesh Mahto demanded extortion and when that was not received then the petitioner and others committed murder of the driver of the vehicle. Allegation against this petitioner and others including Manjhila, Ranjeet Mahto and Puspanjay is identical that they have killed a person on account of his failure to provide extortion money and prayer for bail of those accused persons have been rejected by this court. Considering the above facts, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. avin. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)