IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40210 of 2009 ARUN KUMAR son of raghav Sharan Prasad, resident of Mohalla Shivganj, Narkatiaganj, P.S. Shikarpur, Dist. West Champaran Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 10.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the informant. Offences alleged are under sections 420 , 406 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the petitioner is supplier who supplied goods of worth Rs. 2, 62,826/- whereas the petitioner had paid a total sum of Rs. 70,000/-. However since the rest amount was not paid the petitioner had filed a complaint against the informant. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant submits that the allegations are to the contrary that the petitioner has availed the advance amount but he did not supply the construction material not refund the amount even though the legal notice was served on the petitioner. The learned A.P.P. submits that the differences are with regard to the demand and the supply of goods. Of course there is no civil suit for the same. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case let the above named petitioner in the event of arrest or surrender in the court below within four weeks from today be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri Girish Mishra, J.M. Ist class, Bettiah, West Champaran - 2 - in complaint case no. 557-C of 2009, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J) M.Rahman