IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 24TH MARCH 2011 / 3RD CHAITHRA 1933 RP.No. 206 of 2011() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.12070/2009 Dated 27/01/2011 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- KUTTAPPAN, PULICKAL HOUSE, POONJAR VADAKKEKARA VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.P.BABU KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY SECRETARY TO REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, KOTTAYAM. 3. THE TAHASILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, MEENACHIL, PALA. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.V. MANU THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- R.P.No.206/2011 in W.P.(C) NO.12070/09 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of March, 2011 O R D E R This review petition has been filed mainly relying on paragraph 4 of the judgment in State of Kerala & Ors. V. George Jacob (2010(3)KHC 381). 2. However, a perusal of paragraph 4 of the judgment relied on by the counsel for the petitioner, I am inclined to think that the directions therein were issued mainly on account of the facts of the peculiar facts of the case which was under consideration of the Division Bench. Therefore, the said directions do not in any manner render the judgment under review erroneous. Review Petition fails and is dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :