/\" é; %§§Gé’§ $0U$€T (3F $M%%A??i§G£RH: $§L§x39ijR Wri‘; $a€iiian€§§ Na J8Q 3‘ twé Petmgne? S§swaieei Eiswas, age 38 yeay$ mi AK. E-cwvas, mm“ 5;: W‘w) Jagaaipu, .Q' 1) (30W of madhya F’radesq i?“ wan *{emam an the S“ rsLaw 35$ i"wa;‘ticm, ‘gauaou bnavan, Bhwai. N"! mg The kiditiomai Win :D‘i Chief Secrezwy a? F re”. Nan Gazettcc? bazpuaa 6.1awaw, mmpai 3) The Divi$ona1 ”west {Efficen muth Bas£aa Fa $f DW' w, uukma, Dbl; Daniewaaa, CG. SB: Han’bie $§a:% $u3£§ce Saiish K Am‘imgm 3&3? $u§a§1ash ‘a’aéav swam 3r aha periiwwar. ghri V.¥.$. Niurihy, Depuxy Advoeate Geiaami mm WE $un§ta Jain, Pane! Laww? far fg5§andem wa3I$ia§a {Extéuz QQE M1 {$asmg w f‘“ 2:397) By imis petitEon. (3% pe€ii§ona;’ has assaiiecf me #egai va§§d§§y of ihe ardei‘ of susae‘nsicm comainea m Annexum N2“ am: the charge saae‘i soniained in Annexum A—‘l. 2. :‘z as suammed m VV S mwuv ieaz‘naci comse§ fsz‘ the State ‘ma‘: the oma sf sus§ensiera was revoked or: 8-3—1$9§, when the mater was 9end§ng “before me MP. Acimmistrai’we T§ibunaL A: éhiS junc'ime! $hri Subhash‘ Vadav! ieameé Caumei for ‘ihe pe€§€§0ner subméi‘éeci ‘mai by such revocation the Wm pet§iioa has no? become mfs‘uctLiw$ inasmuch as "zhe péti’dané‘? has caiEecE in ques’tiori téwe §ega§ gzropi‘iety of ”the §ssue of Gha¥ge-shee€ contained in Annexure i354. S § g Leamed courise§ has submi'EEeci ihai the Tiibunai bad directed stay o?" ihe demrmenta! enqaia'y am during ihe continuance of me stay, o€¥zer empioyees were proceeded m fespect of ihe same Charges and ihey have beea excnerated inf éhe same. 3A Having heard Sm‘i Yadav, ieamed cuunsei for ihe peti‘i§onef and $hri V.V.S. Murihy, §eamed counse! for tine State. i am of the considereé opinicm iha€ the Wf§t petition can be d§smse§ 0f on foiiowmg terme: (a) Since fhe order of suspension has been :‘evoked by aihe comgetem au’thog‘iw, the oeti‘tioner wouid be eniieed to geé the benefii of the period ef suepeesioe. {b} if the chafges ffamed against 0‘3:%’3er oo-de%ineuems and if the diecipiiaar‘y proceedmgs iniiéatee’ against teem have eneed in exoneratiea and the charges against éhe goeii‘iioner me simi§an the discin§inary amhoeiy womc‘a be weil. advised t9 consider the case e‘? the aetéeoner cm tee anvii of pant}; and pass a definiie and dear Cider $0 ihai‘ a sim§§aey pieced persen does ne‘t‘suifer iee numiii iion of cen‘iineance ef disc§p§§nary proceeding soiei'y because rae has approached ine Tribuna'r a'i éne eariier stage. (c) Tine aforeeaicé exercise shaié be campieied within a peried or‘ iwo menihs from i‘ne rece§iet of ine order grassed today. \ 4} Witn the aforesaid direciion, ihe wrii petition stands diseased of. T‘nere shaii be ne orcier as t6 costs. 3 n ‘ Sane K.Agnihotri Judge 1&6. as per ruies. Raju