CRM No. M 30737 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 30737 of 2010 Date of decision: 21.11.2010 Tek Chand Sharma ........ Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. N S Shekhawat, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Sidrath Sarup, DAG, Haryana for respondents No. 1 to 5 Mr. P K Chug, Advocate for private respondents -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for issuance of direction to respondents No. 1 to 5 to protect the lives and properties of the petitioner and his other family members as they apprehend imminent threat to their lives and properties at the hands of respondents No. 6 to 13. Mr. Sidrath Sarup, DAG, Haryana, on instructions from ASI Dharam Pal, states that in pursuance to the order dated 09.11.2010, the matter was inquired into and statement of the girl was recorded. CRM No. M 30737 of 2010 2 Accordingly, FIR No. 441 dated 26.11.2010 under Section 292, 506, 120-B of Indian Penal Code and Sections 66-A, 67 of I.T. Act was registered at Police Station Sarai Khwaja, Faridabad. It is further stated that two constables have been posted out side the house of the petitioner. In view of the above, the present petition is rendered infructuous and disposed of as such. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 21.12.2010 mohan