1 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Revision No. 228 OF 2009 Vinayak s/o Bhaiyalalji Bilgaye v. The Amravati Zilla Mahila Sahakari Bank Ltd. Amravati & anr. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's and Registrar's orders orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. J.B. Kasat Advocate for the applicant. Mr. A.S. Kilor Advocate for Respondent no.1. Mr. D.B. Patel, A.P.P. for Respondent no.2. ..... CORAM: A.B.CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 7 th APRIL, _2010. Learned counsel for the applicant as well as for non-applicant no.1 jointly make a statement that the entire amount due has been paid to the bank/respondent no.1 and the bank is satisfied with the payments made and is not interested in pushing the applicant in jail by virtue of the judgment and order of conviction and sentence recorded by the courts below. In view of the above position, the order of sentence passed by the courts below to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months is set aside. Counsel for the applicant states that the compensation of Rs.22,000/- payable to the bank as ordered by the courts below 2 therefore deserves to be waived, to which learned counsel for the bank has no objection. Hence the said direction no.(2) in the operative part of the judgment of the trial Court is set aside. Learned counsel for non- applicant no.1/bank states that amount of Rs.30,000/- is deposited in the trial Court by the applicant and the Bank is entitled to receive the same. Counsel for the applicant has no objection for withdrawal of the same. Hence, the trial Court shall allow the bank to withdraw the amount of Rs.30,000/- deposited with it. The bail bonds shall stand cancelled. Criminal Revision No.228 of 2009 stands disposed of. JUDGE /TA/ 3