IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13888 of 2009 SHASHI BHUSHAN PRASAD SHARMA, son of Late Nathuni Singh, resident of Village Tilhipar,P.S.-Telhara, District- Nalanda at Biharsharif. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Finance Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Patna Municipal Corporation through the Commissioner-Cum-Chief Executive Officer. 3. The Commissioner-cum-Chief Executive Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 26.10.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-Corporation as well as the State. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the payment of his retiral dues as also certain other dues. It is submitted that although the petitioner had represented before the authority concerned stating the details of the claims, but the same has remained unpaid till date. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondent- Corporation submits that in case the petitioner files a fresh representation stating the details of his unpaid claims, the same would be considered as per the law without delay. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as raised in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Commissioner-Cum-Chief Executive Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna (respondent no.3). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of the claims as 2 also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, respondent no.3 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation and dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that, upon consideration, the amount found admissible for payment, with statutory interest, could be paid to the petitioner without delay. However, if any of the claims is found not admissible, the same shall be communicated to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)