IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 17TH JUNE 2011 / 27TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 16237 of 2011(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- M/S PARK RESIDENCY,ERNAKULAM,REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SHRI.KURUVILA AUGUSTINE. BY ADV. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,REVENUE DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,ERNAKULAM, PIN-682030. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT COCHIN,ERNAKULAM-682001. 4. THE TAHSILDAR,KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM-682031. BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV. MR. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 16237 of 2011(D) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 30..12.2010 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 2.12.2009 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KAKKANAD IN THE NAME OF M/S. MARIA RESIDENCY. EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE NON-ATTACHMENT CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER ON 10.01.2010. EXT.P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE LOCATION SKETCH OF THE PROPERTY PREPARED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KAKKANAD. EXT.P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE THANDAPER ACCOUNT ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER. EXT.P6 : TRUE COPY OF THE RE-CONSTITUTED PARTNERSHIP DEED IN THE NAME OF M/S. PARK RESIDENCY. EXT.P7 : TRUE COPY OF TH REGISTRATION NUMBER OBTAINED BY THE PETITIONER IN THE NAME OF M/S. PARK RESIDENCY. EXT.P8 : TRUE COPY OF THE DEED OF AMENDMENT TO THE PARTNERSHIP IN THE NAME OF M/S. PARK RESIDENCY. EXT.P9 : TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE SALE DEED NO. 2155/2003 OF SRO, THRIKKAKARA. EXT.P10 : TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 16.02.2011. /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. W.P.(C) No. 16237 OF 2011 ......................................................................... Dated this the 17th June, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is stated as aggrieved of the impugned order passed by the concerned respondent whereby the transfer of registry sought for, as per the relevant provisions of the Transfer of Registry Rules 1966, has not been acceded to. The case of the petitioner is that, being aggrieved of Ext. P1 order passed by the third respondent, Ext. P10 Revision Petition has been preferred under Section 18(4) of the Transfer of Registry Rules, 1966, which is stated as pending consideration before the second respondent. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the only relief now pressed before this Court is a direction to the second respondent to dispose of Ext. P10, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court does W.P.(C) No. 16237 OF 2011 2 not find it necessary to go into the facts and figures . The writ petition is disposed of, directing the second respondent to consider Ext. P10 Revision Petition and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, of course, after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned, which shall be done within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the second respondent for further steps. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk