T c ^A^ s» IN THE HIGH COURT OF JITDICATURE AT BILASPUR. CHHATTISGARH Writ Petition No; 70 of2006 PETITIONERS/: (Defendants) ^l. ^^ ^••:'%fA>--"" 'J^i& ^-;:yy ^''^ >^£-- '^' ^9 Chaiidan Shukla, S/o Late Prayag Narayan Shukla, Aged about 40 years, Occupation: Bank Employee. Ramendra Shukla, S/o Late Prayag Shukla, Aged about 38 years, Occupatioa: Agricultiire. Shishir ShuUa, S/'o Late Rajesh Kumar @ Upendra ShuUa, Aged about 22 years. All residents ofBrahmpai-a, Near Ram Mandir, Ambikapur, Police Station,/Tehsil: Ambikapur, District: Surguja, Chhattisgarh. - Versus - RESPONDENT/: (Plaintiff) Ram Avtar Agravval, S/o Late Kishan Agrawal, Aged about 58 years, Occupation: Business, R/o Rajesh Restaurant, Near Banaras Chowk, Maiiendragarh Road, Anibikapur, District: Surguja, Chhattisgarh. PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT/WRITS. DIRECTIONS ETC.. IN THE NATURE OF ?vL\NDAMUS. CERTIORARI AND/OR ANY OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OF LIKE NATURE The petitioners, above named, most respectfully beg to submit as under: - =.y .; r.t't> 1::. f- ' HIGH COURT OF CHHATreGARH ATBILASPUR Sinate Bench: Hon'bte Shri Justfee Prashant Kumar Mishra Wfrit Petttion (Ci HoM7Q t 2006 PETITIONERS (Defendants) RESPONDENT (Plainttff) Versus Ctiandan Shukla and others. Ram Avtar Agrawai Shri R.S. Marhas, cminsel forthe p^itionere. Shri Ravish Verma, counsel for responctent wrar pETmoN UNI R ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA J ORALORDER (25.03.2010) The instant p^ition under Artkste 227 of tt»eCwistitution of tndia has been preferred against the order dated 24^)4-2006 passed by the District Judge, Surgup in appeal under Order 43 Rute 1 (r) of G.P.©: whtoh in tum was preferred to chattenge the ordar passed by the tria! Court <m 13-03-2006 rqecting plaintiffs applfcation uirier Orcter 39 Rute 1 & 2 of C.P.C. for grant of temporary injunction. (2) T» plaintiff, cteiming to be the tenant of the defendante, has preferred the sutt for pennanent injunctkMi to restrain the defendants from evtoting him foreefuUy without takii^ irecouree to law. (3) (t is common ground that the su'rt is at the ^age of recording of evidence of the parties. (4) Wfthout comnrentii^ on the merits of the matter and ab<xit their resj ctive rights, entittement and liabilities, this Court directs that the tria! Court shall do well to dispose of the sutt as eariy as possibte and preferably within a period of sbf montte frmn the date the copy of tMs order is presented before the trial Court. (5) Wtlh this obsen/ation, the vwtt petiti<m stands dteposed of. '¥- Sd//- Prashant °ljlr Jud&e Mistaa