IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12325 of 2010 NAVNEET KUMAR UJJWAL, SON OF SHIV KUMAR SINHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-MANJHAULI, P.S. BIKRAM, DISTRICT-PATNA……………….PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR……………….OPPOSITE PARTY. ------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Anjani Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. U.S.P. Singh, A.P.P. ------- 2. 18.5.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 461, 379 and later on added Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that his name had allegedly been disclosed by some spy of the police as having seen four persons on a particular vehicle. Learned counsel submits that though in the First Information Report, it has been alleged that the informant saw four persons escaping from the place of occurrence, neither the petitioner nor the alleged recovered mobile phones had been put to any test of identification even - 2 - though the petitioner is in custody since 24.12.2009. It has also been submitted that there is nothing on record to demonstrate that the alleged recovered mobile phones from the joint family house of the petitioner were the stolen articles. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Navneet Kumar Ujjwal, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Sanjiv Kumar Rai, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Danapur, Patna, in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No.318 of 2009, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be his father. Further, after his release in this case, if the petitioner is again found to be involved in criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Further, the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial in the court below. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of the trial without any reasonable cause - 3 - being shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)