1 spb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 30 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2374 OF 2006 M/s. Akruti City Ltd., .. Petitioner. V/s. Ms.Geeta Maurya and Another .. Contemnors. --- Ms. Dhwani Mehta i/by J. Sagar Associates for the Petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Dubey for Respondent No.1. Ms. Reshmarani J. Nathani i/by Navdeep Vora & Associates for Respondent No.2. --- CORAM : DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATED : 16TH JULY, 2009 P.C. : 1. On 5th May, 2009 this Court, while issuing a Notice to show cause to the First Respondent, observed that prima facie it appears that there was a breach of the undertaking tendered before the Court by the First Respondent in the Consent Terms 2 which were taken on record by an order dated 6th of February, 2008 passed by the Division Bench. The Division Bench while disposing of the Petition accepted the undertakings. The First Respondent was a signatory to the Consent Terms and to the Plan at page 66 of the paper-book, which reflected the alternative premises that were to be allotted. Despite this the First Respondent had not vacated the existing premises. The First Respondent appeared before the Court in pursuance to the Notice to show cause. Hearing of the Contempt Petition was adjourned on 23rd of June,2009; 30th June, 2009; 1st July, 2009 and 15th July, 2009 since the Court was informed that an effort was being made by the parties to attempt an amicable solution. 2. Yesterday, the Court was informed that the dispute has been resolved and the parties would desire to place Consent Terms on the record. Consent Minutes signed by the parties and their Advocates have been placed on record today. The Consent Minutes are taken on record and marked “X” for 3 identification. Contemnor No.1 is personally present before the Court and the Court is informed that the Consent Minutes have been duly explained and interpreted to her by the Advocate appearing on her behalf. The authorised representative of the Petitioners is also present before the Court. 3. Since the Contemnor has agreed to vacate the premises subject to the Terms which have been agreed upon, it will not be expedient in the interest of justice to pursue the exercise of the contempt jurisdiction any further. In the event there is a further breach, the Petitioners would be at liberty to apply. The Contempt Petition shall accordingly stand disposed of by recording and accepting the statements made in the Consent Minutes of the order signed by the parties. (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.) .....