Farad Continuation Sheet No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3717 OF 2007 IN CRI.APPEAL NO.526 OF 2007. (LAKHESINGH LIKSAHAY DHURVE & ANR. Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .) ________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ Mrs. Barabde h/f. A. Sambre, Advocate for applicant. Shri D.P.Thakare, A.P.P. for Respondent. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : NOVEMBER 26, 2008. 1. Applicant No.1 Lakhesingh, was in jail for about three years at the time of his conviction on 26.02.2007 and was sentenced to suffer R.I. for five years. Thus, by now, he has been in jail for about four years and nine months. Considering the remission that he would have been entitled to, he has already served most of his sentence. 2. Therefore, remaining part of the substantive sentence of applicant No.1 be suspended on his furnishing P.R.B. in Rs.Twenty Five Thousand with solvent surety in the like sum. 3. As far as applicant No.2 Mathavarabai Jivanlal Kumare is concerned she was in jail for about 14 months on the date of her conviction i.e. on 26.02.2007 and she too has thus, suffered almost three years of imprisonment by now. 4. In view of this, remaining part of the substantive sentence of applicant No.2 be suspended on her furnishing P.R.B. in Rs.Twenty Five Thousand with solvent surety in the like sum. 5. Surety(ties) to be furnished by the applicants may either be from local limits of the Sessions Court, Chandrapur and if from District Seoni (Madhya Pradesh), such surety should be accepted only after getting verification from the Tahsildar/ Revenue Officer concerned. JUDGE RR.