1 S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.677/2010. Gopal Krishan Dhawan. VS Laxman Rawat & Ors. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.677/2010. Gopal Krishan Dhawan. VERSUS Laxman Rawat and Others. 23.03.2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.Mahesh Gupta ] Mr.Manu Bhargava ] for the appellant. Mr.Paras Kuhad, for the respondents. ***** During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the interest of the plaintiff-appellant would be safeguarded in case the respondents No.2 to 6 are permitted to transfer and alienate the property in dispute subject to their furnishing a solvent security for an amount of Rs.50,00,000/- (In words:Rupees Fifty Lakhs) before the learned trial court to the satisfaction of the learned trial court. The aforesaid offer appears to be just and reasonable and would take care of the interest of the appellant. In the facts and circumstances, while maintaining the impugned order this appeal is disposed of with the direction that in case the defendants-respondents No.2 to 6 furnish a solvent security to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for an amount of Rs.50,00,000/- (In 2 S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.677/2010. Gopal Krishan Dhawan. VS Laxman Rawat & Ors. words:Rupees Fifty Lakhs), the respondents would be free to alienate the property in dispute. The respondents would further furnish a certified copy of the transactions of the sale-deeds, agreements, etc. entered into by the defendants in respect of the suit property and file the same before the learned trial court from time to time. The aforesaid undertaking given by the learned counsel for and on behalf of the respondent is without prejudice to the rights of the defendants to contest the suit on merits. Consequently, the appeal as well as the stay application stand disposed of, as above. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.