1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.09.2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.11171 OF 2011 AND M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2011 1.S.V.S.P.Kumararaja 2.Poiyali 3.E.Gurusamy 4.Karuppusamy 5.Ramasubramanian ..Petitioners Vs. 1.State rep. By:: The Inspector of Police, Koppampatti Police Station, Tuticorin District. In crime No.14 of 2011 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kovilpatti, Tuticorin District. 3.P.Jeyakumar ..Respondents Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records in connection with crime No.14 of 2011 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Veilkani Raju For Respondents: Mr.A.P.Balasubramani G.A., (Crl. Side) for R1 and R2 ORDER This petition has been filed to call for the records in connection with crime No.14 of 2011 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same. 2.Heard both sides. 3.On the basis of the complaint given by the 3rd respondent/defacto complaint, a case has been registered in crime No.14 of 2011 on the file of the 1st respondent for the offence under sections 120 (b), 419,. 423, 465, 467 and Section 3(1)(IV) of SC/ST Act on 03.02.2011. 4.Today, when the matter was taken up, the petitioners/accused and the 3rd respondent/defacto complainant are present and they have filed a joint memo stating that at the intervention of the elders, the matter has been compromised between them and the 3rd respondent/defacto complainant do not want to pursue the matter against the petitioners only and he has no objection to quash the proceedings against the petitioners only. The said joint memo filed by the 3rd respondent/defacto complainant and the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 petitioners is recorded. 5.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would rely upon the decision reported in 2009(2) CTC 220 (Prakash and others Vs. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thiruvidaimaruthur, Thanjavur District and others). 6.Considering the decision cited supra and recording the joint memo filed by the 3rd respondent/defacto complainant and the petitioners/A1,2 and 5 to 7, this Court is of the view that this is a fit case to quash the proceeding against the petitioner/accused Nos.1,2 and 5 to 7. 7.Accordingly, this criminal original petition is allowed and the proceedings Crime No.14 of 2011 dated 03.02.2011 as against the petitioners/Accused Nos.1,2 and 5 to 7 on the file of the 1st respondent is hereby quashed against the petitioners/A1,2 and 5 to 7. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. SD ASST REGISTRAR ( CRL SIDE ) /TRUE COPY/ SUB ASST REGISTRAR Arul To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.2, Kovilpatti. 2.The Inspector of Police, Koppampatti Police Station, Tuticorin District. 3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kovilpati, Thoothukudi District. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,Madurai. 1CC TO MR. M. VEILKANI RAJU, ADVOCATE, SR: 30010: DM:2011:SEPTEMBER:16:: Crl.O.P(MD)No.11171 of 2011 05.09.2011 2P:6C: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/