IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRAPRADESH AT HYDERABAD HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.3323 of 2009 & 10110 of 2010 DATE: 08.12.2011 CRL.P.No.3323 of 2009 Between: N.Babu Ramesh Chand …… Petitioner And State by Station House Officer, Eluru II Town Police Station, rep. by Public Prosecutor and another …..Respondents CRL.P.No.10110 of 2010 Between: Nukala Devi Varaprasada Venkata Subba Rao …… Petitioner And The State of A.P, through Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P, Hyderabad and 2 others …..Respondents HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.3323 of 2009 & 10110 of 2010 COMMON ORDER : The petitioners in both the petitions are not named as accused persons in crime No.100/2009 of Eluru II Town Police Station, West Godavari District, in respect of which they are seeking quashing under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The accused named therein are N.Anjaneyulu and his brother. It is contended that neither N.Anjaneyulu nor his brother is alive. The criminal law proceeds not on names of individuals but proceeds on identity of individuals. One person may have several names and may not have any name at all. 2) Allegations in the report given by the victim Pantham Venkateswara Rao, Public Health Worker- cum-Driver in Eluru Municipality to the Health Oﬃcer, who forwarded the same to the Municipal Commissioner who in turn forwarded the same to the Police, attract the oﬀences under Sections 353, 323 I.P.C and Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. It is contended that mother of the petitioners gave report to the Municipal Commissioner alleging killing of pet dog by the municipal workers by administering poison and that therefore this false case was instituted against the petitioners. On the report given by the public health worker-cum-driver, the health oﬃcer and the Municipal Commissioner went to the locality and after enquiry only forwarded the same to the police. It would be premature to contend and to ﬁnd that report given by the public health worker is a counter blast for the report given by the mother of the petitioners. If there is any illegality or criminality committed by public health worker, it is for the petitioners or their mother to take appropriate steps and proceedings against him. There are no circumstances herein to quash F.I.R in this case. 3) Since the petitioners are not admitting that they are the accused herein, the petitioners are not entitled for any relief in these petitions. It is for the police to investigate and ﬁnd out who are the real culprits who are named as N.Anjaneyulu and his brother in the report. 4) In the result, both the Criminal Petitions are dismissed. _______________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J December 08, 2011 ksh