IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 895 OF 2008 IN MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 930 OF 2007 MR. UPDESH DEVRAJ ANAND ... Applicant Versus MR. PRAKASH K. NAIK AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. P.Rao, Learned Counsel for the Applicant. Coram:- C. L. PANGARKAR, J. Date:- 12th January, 2009 P.C.: Heard learned Counsel for the applicant. By Order dated 28.2.2008, the respondent No.2 had applied for withdrawal of the amount. In view of the fact that respondent No.1 died, therefore there is no question to pay the amount to the respondent No.1. The amount has been directed to be paid to the respondent No.2, since the matter is settled in the Lok Adalat. It appears that the court had directed the amount to be paid to the respondent No.1. In advertantly the respondent No.2 is entitled the amount to be paid. It be paid to respondent No.2. The application is disposed of. C. L. PANGARKAR, J. ah