WP(C) 5864/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY The petitioner, a student of the Three Years LL.B. Course of the Gauhati University (for short, hereinafter referred to as ’the University’), is before this Court seeking judicial intervention so as to facilitate his appearance in t he ensuing final examination. I have heard Mr R Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr LP Sa rma, learned Standing Counsel, Gauhati University. The facts leading to the filing of the instant petition have to be summa rized. The petitioner after having graduated himself took admission in the afor ementioned course in the academic session of 2002-03 and appeared in his first L L.B. Preliminary Examination held in the month of December, 2003 but was unsucce ssful. In his next attempt he, however, cleared the said examination which was h eld in the month of January, 2005. Though he took the examination in the interme diate course held in the month of December, 2004, he could not clear Paper-III t hereof. In his next attempt in November, 2005 he, however, passed in the said su bject. In his pursuit to clear the final examination the petitioner appeared in January, 2006; March, 2007; December, 2007 and also in the year 2008. He, howeve r, inspite of his repeated and persistent efforts could not clear Paper-II of th e said course. He having been declined to take the examination in the said Paper again in the year 2010 inspite of a representation being filed by him to that e ffect, he is before this Court. Mr Sarma while admitting that meanwhile the petitioner in his pursuit to clear Paper-II of the Final Year LL.B. Course has availed all the four chances as prescribed under the relevant Regulations as well as the Notification dated 2 7.9.2007, has beseeched this Court to issue a direction to the concerned authori ty of the University to consider his representation afresh favourably and to all ow him to take the ensuing examination in which he intensely desire to appear. In response, the learned Standing Counsel of the University has urged th at as admittedly the petitioner has utilized all the four chances available to h im under the relevant Regulations and the Notification associated therewith, in view of the decision of a Division Bench of Court rendered in Monmi Sarma -vs- G auhati University & Ors., (2009) 5 GLR 144, no such direction as prayed for ough t to be issued. A combined reading of Clause-15 of the New Regulations & Syllabus for LL .B. Course and the Notification dated 27.9.2007 demonstrates without any ambigu ity that a candidate pursuing the aforementioned course is entitled in all to av ail four chances in each part thereof. The petitioner having admittedly utilized all his chances, he cannot be permitted thereunder to appear in the forthcoming final examination of the University. The decision of the concerned authority th ereof declining his request, therefore, cannot be faulted with in terms of the a forementioned Regulations as well as the Notification relatable thereto. A Divis ion Bench of this Court in Monmi Sarma -vs- Gauhati University & Ors., (2009) 5 GLR 144 has authoritatively taken the said view as well. In the above premise, there is no merit in the instant petition which ac cordingly is dismissed. No costs.