IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 7623 of 2010 Date of Decision: 22.11.2010 Rishi Pal @ Jaggu .... Petitioner Versus Braham Dev and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. H.P.S. Aulakh, Advocate for the petitioner 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner shall move appropriate application under Section 12 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 seeking permission to repair the shop. He further states that filing of the application under Section 12 of the Act pursuant to the order dated 8.10.2010 passed by Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.) Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri should not be construed as admission of the plaintiff on the question of title. He further states that plaintiff-petitioner shall prove his title independently in the pending civil suit and moving of application under Section 12 of the Act shall not effect plaintiff's right to prove the title. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition. Present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the observation that moving of an application under Section 12 of the C.R. No. 7623 of 2010 2 Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 pursuant to the Civil Court's order shall not be construed as admission against the petitioner in a pending title suit. (ALOK SINGH) 22.11.2010 JUDGE reena