IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.24332 of 2007 Between: Sami Venkata Srinivasa Rao, S/o Late Venkata Subba Rao, Resident of Podili Village and Mandal, Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Ongole, Prakasam District. 2 The Circle Inspector of police, Podili, Prakasam District. 3 Avuluri Yellamanda, S/o Kotaiah, R/o Viswanadhapuram, Podili Village & Mandal, Prakasam District. 4 Avuluri Nageswari, W/o yellamanda, R/o Viswanadhapuram, Podili Village & Mandal, Prakasam District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MRS.PULIPATI RADHIKA Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 & 2:AGP FOR HOME Counsel for Respondent Nos.3 & 4:MR. G.PEDA BABU ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in not taking any action on the representation dated 6-11-2007 submitted by the petitioner as illegal and arbitrary.” After arguing the case for some time, Smt. P.Radhika, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to him to approach the Civil Court, which granted the order of injunction, to initiate appropriate proceedings against respondent Nos.3 and 4 for violation of order of injunction. Since the petitioner has got a legal right to initiate such proceedings, he always has such a liberty. Subject to these observations, the writ petition is dismissed. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 1st JUNE, 2009. kvni