IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19462 of 2008 BHUNESHWAR TANTI, SON OF LATE BAJRANGI TANTI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DAULATPUR, P.S. JAMALPUR, DISTT. MUNGER. ------ PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. ANIL SINGH, SON OF LATE BAIKUNTH SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAHADEO SIMARIYA, P.S. SIKANDRA, DISTT. JAMUI. ------ OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 2. 05.04.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioners are aggrieved with the order dated 4.3.2008 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamui, in Complaint Case No. 20C of 2008 by which cognizance has been taken under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The case of the Complainant is that he approached the Health Department for securing a job for his eldest son but the same was not done despite having taken money from him. Considering that all these allegations are only oral without any documentary proof, and at best it would be a case of civil dispute for which the Complainant should take recourse of money suit, I am inclined to set aside the order of cognizance. In the result the application is allowed and the entire proceeding including order dated 4.3.2008 passed by the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jamui, in Complaint Case No. 20C of 2008 is quashed. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)