THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5321 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner ﬁled O.S.No.1022 of 2001 in the Court of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ongole against the deceased respondent No.3 for recovery of a sum of Rs.1,27,160/-. The suit was decreed and after the decree became ﬁnal, the petitioner ﬁled E.P.No.288 of 2007. It appears that respondent No.3 was employed in the oﬃce of the District Collector, Prakasam, respondent No.9 herein, and he died during the pendency of the E.P. An application was ﬁled with a prayer to direct respondent No.9 to send the death beneﬁts of respondent No.3 to the credit of the E.P. Respondent No.9, however, informed the Court that the amounts were already paid to the dependents on 19.07.2008. The petitioner ﬁled E.A.No.206 of 2008 under Section 151 C.P.C. with a prayer to summon respondent Nos.5 to 9 to the Court. It was pleaded that necessary facts can be ascertained, once respondent Nos.5 to 9 are summoned to the Court. The executing Court dismissed the application through order, dated 04.06.2010. Hence, this revision. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. On the face of it, the application is untenable. The eﬀorts made by the petitioner to seek direction against a garnishee did not fructify. Therefore, he could have chosen alternatives, namely to proceed against the properties of the legal representatives of the judgment-debtor or if any of them are employed, to get their salary attached by ﬁling an application under the relevant provisions of law. There was absolutely no basis for him to ﬁle the application to summon the respondents. The executing Court has taken the correct view of the matter. Hence, the civil revision petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt: 29.11.2011. kdl