IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1418 OF 2006 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1418 OF 2006 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1418 OF 2006 Vinodkumar Vrandavandas Kanabar ...Petitioner V/s. Smt.Meera Borvankar (Crime), Jt.Commissioner of Police & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.V.V. Kanabar, Petitioner in person present. Mr.Y.S. Shinde, APP for State. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : AUGUST 22, 2007 DATED : AUGUST 22, 2007 DATED : AUGUST 22, 2007 P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- . Heard the petitioner in person. 2. The petitioner takes exception to the order passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 17th Court, Mumbai, whereby his private complaint was dismissed by order dated 14th June, 2005 and the revision application filed by him against the said order was also dismissed by the Sessions Court. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that he had filed the private complaint against Senior Police Officers on the ground that they had not properly supervised their subordinate officers and as a result, - 2 - the petitioner was arrested in the false and fabricated case in which it is alleged that the petitioner had committed extortion. The complaint is filed against the Senior Police Officers who were not concerned with the arrest of the petitioner herein in respect of the offence alleged in the complaint which was lodged against them. It is the case of the petitioner that petitioner was arrested for offence punishable under Section 385 of the IPC. It is submitted that the said offence is bailable and even then, he was retained in the police custody for more than 20 hours. It is submitted that therefore, Senior Police Officers had failed in their duty in supervising the subordinate police officers. The complaint was dismissed by passing a reasoned order. Revision Application also has been dismissed. 4. In my view, no case is made out for interfering with the orders passed by the lower Courts while exercising writ jurisdiction of this Court. . Writ Petition, accordingly, dismissed. - 3 - (V.M. KANADE, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)