_y ^) t}:;"!fS t»!'a«K;' Sf'fs.^'i ^fr-f-zro IN THE fflGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (s) No. .....q.6.9......../200^ PETITtONER ??•' ^•i^.--'' V'?'' i'\1 .^: M^ ^" ^Sbila IChaperday W/o. Shri Dhushyaat Khaperday Aged about 50 years Post - Assistant Teacher Govt. Primary School Natunwa gaon, Block Dongargaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon. (C.G.) < ^" A-'" RESPONDENTS VERSUS ^ State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary Department of Education Mautralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3: Block Education Officer Block - Dongargaon District -~ Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WMT PETITION U/A 226/27^0F THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIAFORISSUANCEOF WRTTSmTHE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOK OTHER SmTABLE WRITSAND DIRECTIONS The petitioner named above most humbly and respectfully begs to submitas under:- yiew COURT OF cHHAmseARH AT BILASPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HON-BLE MR. SATISH K A6NIHOTRI. J. WRIT PETTTION tS.) N0. 464 OF 2007 Petitioner verais Resoondents Hemroi Kumbhkar State of Chhatl'isgarh and others WRIT PETTTION tS) N0. 465 OF 2007 PffLitioner Resoondents versys Siddharth Chaure State of Chhattisgarh and o-thers Petitioner WRTT PETTTION fS 1 N0. 466 OF 2007 Pimch Ram 5ahu versus Responctents : State of Chhattisgarh ond o-thers WRTT PFTTTION (S.) N0. 467 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versus Monharon Lat Pithaura S'tute of Chhatt'isgarh and olhers WRTT PETHION fS.l N0. 468 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents versus Yaggaya Datt'a Baghel State of Chhatt'isgarh and o-Hiers WRTT PETmON (S.) N0. 469 OF 2007 Petitioner verajs Respondents Shila Khaperctay State of ChhorM'isgarh ond o-thers WMT PETITION (5.1 N0. 470 OF 2007 Petitioner : Rndhey Kishun Patel versus ftespondents : State of Chhattisgarh and others WRTT PETmON (S.) N0. 471 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versus AAnngonLal State of Chhattisgarh nnd o-thers WRTT PETmON IS.) N0. 472 OF 2007 Petitioner : Dhal Singh Sonuwni versus ftespondents ; State of Chhattisgnrh ond o-thers WRTT PETITION (S.) N0. 473 OF 2007 - Petitioner : Onkar Lal Sonboir versus Respondents : Stdte of Chhattisgarh ond others WRTT PETTTION (S.) N0. 474 OF 2007 Petitioner : Shiv (Cumar Sharma versus Resoondents : Sta'te of Chhcrtti^arh and olhers WRTT pETmoN rs.i NO. 475 OF20QZ Petrtioner Resbondents versus Rajendra Kumar Sagar State of Chhatt-isgurh and others X) WRTT PFTmON (S.) N0. 476 OF 2007 Petjtioner Makhanbl Thakur versus Respondents : State of Chharttisgarh and others WRTT PETITCON (S.) N0. 477 OF 2007 Petitioner versys Resoondents Fool Chond Kamleshwar State of Chhattisgarh and olhers WRIT PETTTION (S.l N0. 478 OF 2007 Petjtioner venys Respondents Kajendra Kumar Dewongan State of Chhatt'isgarh ond o-thers And WRTT PETTTION (S.) N0. 479 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents yersys Joyant Kumar Shendey S'tate of Chhottisgarh ond others 1. Present : Mr. R.K. Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sushil Dubey, Sovemment Advocate for the Slate/respondents. OftDER Q'assed on 24th Day of Janueuy, 2007} Leamed counsel oppearirg for the petHioners as well as teomed Sovemment Advocate appearhig for the Sta-te/respondents jointly submit -that the facts and question of law involved in the present batch of writ petitions are squarely covered by -the decision of this Court in the cose of YtalMwit Kuww BhoiwdHw^i »s. Munle^al Cwpoiwllon. t^iy eswl evwrtM^. 2. In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (5.) No.4130 of 2005 (Sopesfi Kumar ysnmva. Ths Sfafs ffwt. af ChhaHisQaiii and mwthw) ond o-ther connected mdft'ers, decided by •this Sl Court on 15-12-2006. pursuont to-the memo dated 28-1-1995, isaied by •the Secre-hiry. Board of Seconctary Educatwn, Bhopal ond the prospectus of Diploma m Educatron Examination, it wss cku-ified that -the nomenckture of the Basic Troining Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been chcnged and renamed as Oiploma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (5.) No.4130 of 2005 {Sapedi l&imar Vermavs. TTie State Govt. of Qdwttisgarh ondanolhe^ (Supra). 3. For -the aforementioned reasons. the writ petitions are di^iosed of in terms of the decisipn of this Court in the matter of Yadiwaint Kumar WiaradwaJ\Su^r«}, subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.T.I./D.Ed. Cert'ificates at their awn expenses as per the circuhrs dated 24-12-1998 ond l-3-1999 jand further whether -rttey have been paid two advance increreents or not. No order as to costs. 4. A copy of Ihis order be placed on the record of the connected writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 2006CEI)MPJK-C696 Thakur