IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15606 of 2011 Sri Bhola Prasad Mandal , Son of Late Ayodhya Mandal, resident of village- Ambai, P.S. Habibpur, P.O. Mirjanhat , District-Bhagalpur ------------------ Petitioner Versus 1. The Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur through the Vice-Chancellor 2. The Vice-Chancellor, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur 3. The Pro Vice-Chancellor, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur 4. The Registrar, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur 5. The Finance Officer, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur --------------- Respondents. ---------------------------------- 02 13-09-2011 Heard Sri Radha Raman Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent/ Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 31.01.2000 as Section Officer from Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, has prayed for directing the Respondents to grant merger of 50 % dearness relief on his basic pension with effect from 1st January,2005 , revise his pension in terms of Government Resolution No.820 dated 23.09.2009 and to pay arrears of difference of pension as well as leave encashment etc. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that so far as the issues regarding merger of 50 % dearness relief and revision of pension are concerned, the same have already been settled in C.W.J.C.No.3616 of 2010 ( Dr. Himanshu Bhushan Vs. T.M.Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur & Ors.) and other connected writ petitions disposed of on 3.12.2010. Learned counsel for the University does not dispute the fact that the aforesaid two issues have already been settled. Accordingly, the writ petition so far as claim of merger of 50% dearness relief and revision of pension is concerned is allowed in terms of order dated 3.12.2010 passed in C.W.J.C.No.3616 of 2010 ( Dr. Himanshu Bhushan Vs. T.M.Bhagalpur University & Ors.) and other connected writ petitions. Regarding other reliefs, the petitioner is granted liberty to file a detailed representation before the Respondent no.2/ Vice- Chancellor, T.M.Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed by the petitioner, the Respondent no.2 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. If Respondent no.2 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for payment within the aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, the Respondent no.2 is required to pass speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within three months from the date of filing of such representation. With the above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)