IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25800 of 2008 1. VIJAY KUMAR 2. AHILYA DEVI 3. BOTH SON AND DAUGHTER OF LATE RAM JATAN PRASAD ALL RESIDENT OF MOHALLA TARNI PRASAD LANE, P.S. KHAJEKALA, P.O. – JHAUGANJ, DISTT. PATNA. AT PRESENT AHILYA DEVI, WIFE OF MR. DEO MUNI, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA – TRYA SAHOG ROAD, P.S. HILSA, DISTT. NALANDA. -------- PETITIONERS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ---- OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- 2. 05.05.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioners prayed for quashing the order dated 30.5.2007 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna, in Complaint Case No. 3710(C) of 2006 by which it has taken cognizance under Sections 420 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code. The case of the prosecution was that the Complainant was married with the petitioner No. 2 and out of their wedlock, one child was born who was given to the petitioner No. 1 on direction of the High Court. However, he had been given permission to meet the child despite which the petitioner No. 2 did not allow the meetings and, thereafter, showed the Complainant’s son having been adopted by his maternal grandfather. On going through the complaint as well as the petition filed herein, I find that the complaint is completely misconceived and baseless. In the result, the application is allowed and the entire 2 proceeding of Complaint Case No. 3710(C) of 2006 is quashed. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)