THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 25388 of 2009 Oral order: The petitioner states that he made representation dated 30.09.2009 to respondent No.1, namely the Deputy Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, complaining about the illegal constructions being made by respondent Nos. 2 to 5 on the northern side of his house by encroaching the public road which is choking the drainage lines, and it is his grievance that no action thereon had been taken till date. Hence, he seeks appropriate directions to respondent No.1. Even though vakalat is filed for respondent Nos. 2 to 5, but none appeared for them. However, the learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.1 submitted that respondent No.1 has requested the Tahsildar concerned, to conduct survey of the road and submit report, and based on the report to be submitted by him, respondent No.1 will take further action in the matter. In view of the above, I deem it appropriate to consider and dispose of the writ petition directing respondent No.1 to pass appropriate orders on the representation of the petitioner after receiving the survey report from the Tahsildar concerned and after issuing notice to respondent Nos. 2 to 5, expeditiously, and then take action in accordance therewith Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 11th August, 2010 KSR