HIGH COURTOFCHHATTISGARHATBILASPUR WRITPETITION(2271 N0, 5630/2011 PETITIONERS (Plaintiffs) 1. 2A. 2B. 2C. ^ •^ Respondents Plaintiffs YERSUS 1A. 1B. # 5. Abrar Ali Ansari, son of Late Asgar AIi Ansari (wrongly written Ansar), aged abouf49 years. Amt. Nafina wife of Late Roshan Ali Ansari,laged about 33 years. Aftab son of Late Roshan Ali Ansari, aged about 21 years. Khusdil son of Late Roshan Ali Ansari, aged about 16 years. Haider Ali, son of Late Sobrati, aged about; 55 years. Akhtar Alt Ansari, son of Late Asgar Ali, aged about 45 years. Applicant no. 2C minor through Natural Guardian and Mother Applicant no.2 Smf. Nafina wife of Roshan Ali Ansari, All residence of Ram Mandir Road, Bhrampara Ambikapur, Police Station and Tahsil Ambikapur, District SargLija, Chhattisgarh. Arun Kumar Vcrma, son of Lcite Jagdish Prasad Verma, aged about 60 years. Anil Kumar Verma, son of Late Jagdish Prasad Verma, agcd about 47 years. Both resiGiencc of Rammandir Road, Bhlrampara, Ambikapur, Police Station and Tahsil Ambikapur, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, Sarguja, Ambikapar, Chhattisgarh, Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Ambikapur, Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. Nazui Adhikari, Ambikapur, Districf Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. Hanyman Singh Nazul/ Revenue Inspector, Ambikapur, District Sargu]a,Chhatttsgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (SB :Hon>ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:- Mr. C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate fbr the petitioners. Ms.. Sangeeta Mishra, P.L. fbr the State/ respondents No. 2 to 4,on advance notice. RespondentsNo. 1A, 1B & 5 notnoticed. ^' c -<g- ORDER !Jl 3. 4. (Passed on 22/09/2011) By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India petitioners have challenged the legality and propriety of the order dated 14/7/2011 passed by Second Additional District'Judge, Sarguja (Ambikapur) in Civil M.J.C. No. 4/2011 whereby application filed under Order 9 Rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (in short 'the Code') has been dismissedby Second Additional District Judge, Sarguja (Ambikapur). After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to file Miscellaneous Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(C) of the Code. Prayer allowed. Consequently, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.No order as to cosfs. Certified copy of the order impugned be returned to the learned counsel for the pefitioners after his submission of duly photostat copy of the same. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge ^...