[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.235 OF 2008 IN REVISION APPLN.NO.269 OF 2008 1. Shri.Ramesh Balasaheb Dargode 2. Shri.Balasaheb Kacharu Dargode 3. Sau.Latabai Balasaheb Dargode ..Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.M.S.Karnik Advocate for Applicants Mr.Rajesh More APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : AUGUST 26, 2008 DATE : AUGUST 26, 2008 DATE : AUGUST 26, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard both sides. 2. The applicants have been convicted under Sections 498-A and 304-B of IPC. The learned advocate for the applicants stated that the applicants were on bail and they have not misused the liberty granted to them. It is further stated that the revision preferred by the applicants is not likely to be heard in the nearfuture and prayed [-2-] that the applicants be released on bail. 3. The case of the prosecution is that due to illtreatment and harassment by the applicants, Sangita died on account of consuming poison. There is no material to show that Sangita consumed poison. The CA report is negative. In this view of the matter, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicants. 4. Each of the applicant nos.1 to 3 i.e. applicant no.1-Ramesh Balasaheb Dargode, applicant no.2-Balasaheb Kacharu Dargode and applicant no.3-Latabai Balasaheb Dargode be released on bail in the sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rs.thirty thousand only) each with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The applicants to report to Dindori Police Station, Dist.Nasik once in a month till the disposal of the revision application. 5. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]