IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.CHELAMESWAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 2ND JUNE 2011 / 12TH JYAISHTA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 546 of 2011(S) ------------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WA.2062/2010 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -------------------------------- PROMPT CHARITABLE TRUST, REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN,36/684,TAILOR STREET, PALAKKAD-678001 BY ADV. SRI.C.A.MAJEED RESPONDENT(S): ------------------ 1. DR.T.K.NARAYANAN, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O.T.T.KOPPUNNY, WORKING AS REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT THENHIPALAM-673635 2. SHRI.TOME JOSE IAS, WORKING AS SPECIAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KERALA IN CHARGE OF VICE CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENHIPALAM-673635 BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J. CHELAMESWAR, C.J & ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------- Cont.Case (C).No. 546 of 2011 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of June, 2011 JUDGMENT Antony Dominic, J. This petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience on the part of the respondents in complying with the directions in Annexure A1 judgment. By Annexure A1 judgment dated 5th April, 2011, the respondents were directed to take a decision on the request of the petitioner for affiliation for MBA course. 2. From the pleadings it is seen that pursuant to the directions in the judgment, an inspection team of the first respondent-University has visited the petitioner's institution on 25.5.2011. It is also seen that though a meeting of the Syndicate was scheduled on 29.5.2011, the same was postponed. It is submitted by the petitioner that since the last date for applying for admission to MBA course during the present academic year is 31.5.2011, petitioner should have given affiliation before that date and therefore there is violative of direction in the judgment. The judgment was rendered on 5.4.2011 and the inspection Cont.Case.546/11 2 was held on 25.5.2011. The follow up action taken shows that there is no deliberate attempt on the part of the respondents in not complying with the directions in the judgment, warranting proceedings under the Contempt of Court Act. The Contempt of Court Case is, therefore, dismissed. J.CHELAMESWAR, CHIEF JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE vgs