1 pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 160 OF 2010 Mrs. Anita Ashok Shetty .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents Mr. Prashant Maggu for petitioner. Mr. D. P. Adsule, APP for State. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. JULY 06, 2010. P.C. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, who seeks to impugn the notice dated 13/12/2007 issued under Section 149 of Cr. P.C. and directing the petitioner to remove the cameras installed at the entrance of the Hotel/Restaurant run by the petitioner. Even by the petitioner’s own contentions and as intimated to the Senior Inspector of Police, Bhoiwada Police Station vide her letter dated 10/4/2009, the petitioner has re-installed the cameras and, therefore, as of now, the 2 challenge to the notice dated 13/12/2007 is stale. Hence, there is no case made out to entertain this petition at this belated stage. Petition is rejected. However, this order will not prevent the petitioner from raising appropriate challenge to the fresh notice, if any. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)