*1* IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2480/2009 Muhammad Ibrahim Para. ..Petitioner -VERSUS- State of Maharashtra and others. ..Respondents ............... Mr.P.R.Hegde, for the Petitioner. Mr.Mandar Goswami, AGP for the Respondent No.1/State. Mr.Ashok Kotangale, for the Respondent No.2. ............... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.P. DESHPANDE, JJ. Dated 18th December, 2009. P.C.:- 1 The counsel for Respondent No.2 University states that the representation of Petitioner (at Exhibit-O page-61 of this petition) is pending consideration before the Grievance Cell Committee of the University, for which reason, this petition is pre- mature. 2 The counsel for Petitioner, on instructions, submits that as of now the Grievance Cell Committee is not functioning. This position is refuted by the counsel for Respondent No.2 and he submits that the incharge Vice-Chancellor is heading that Grievance Cell Committee and the representation made by Petitioner can be considered by the said Committee. 3 In the circumstances, we dispose of this petition with *2* liberty to the Petitioner to pursue the remedy before the Grievance Cell Committee which in turn shall dispose of the representation of Petitioner as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of four weeks from today. Writ Petition is disposed of in the above terms. (A.P. Deshpande, J) (A.M.Khanwilkar, J)