THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.8683 of 2010 Dated:19.04.2010 Between: Smt.K.Jyothi. ...Petitioner And Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, And others. ...Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.8683 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner is a Sarpanch of Jawharnagar Gram Panchayat. She filed the instant writ petition assailing the notice dated 13.04.2010 issued by Tahsildar attaching the movables under Andhra Pradesh Revenue Recovery Act, 1864. It is the case of the petitioner that when she was spinster she purchased plot No.6 admeasuring 333 square yards in Survey No.447, Jawaharnagar Village, Shameerpet Mandal, in Ranga Reddy District, from Janaki Ram under an agreement of sale. She allegedly constructed a house and obtained a ration card. She also relies on house tax receipts and election identity card in proof of possession. On 15.03.1992 she was married to Shanker Goud. She alleges that on 12.04.2010 she and her children along with her husband went to Yadagirigutta on pilgrimage. In her absence the subordinate officials of third respondent came to the house and took away movables like T.V., Computer, Washing Machine, Refrigerator, D.V.D, five ceiling fans, ten chairs, and notice was issued on 13.04.2010. At the stage of admission itself Assistant Government Pleader submits that the petitioner’s husband was Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat earlier. Surcharge proceedings were initiated against him for recovery of about Rs.37,00,000/- and in that connection movables were attached. He submits that the electricity bills stand in the name of one Nagamma, and that respondents are not conducting any auction of the house. The same is recorded. Insofar as the attachment of movables is concerned, Assistant Government Pleader has placed before me the panchanama which shows that movables were attached in the presence of D.Prakash, S/o.Yadaiah, the petitioner’s brother. A copy of the panchanama is placed before this Court and the same is made part of the record. As there is no move to auction the house bearing No.4-17 allegedly owned by the petitioner, the writ petition is misconceived. The petitioner may approach the third respondent for the release of the attached movables by filing a claim petition. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. ____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 19.04.2010 Note: Issue C.C in one week. B/o. vs