1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO. 355/2005 (Santosh Pandurang Hazare & 4 ors. Vs. Bajirao Sadu Nannaware) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. Mr. P.S. Lambat, Adv. for the appellants. Mr. A.S. Chandurkar, Adv. for R- Sole. CORAM : Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, J. DATED : 26 th AUGUST, 2008. The learned counsel for the parties have presented a compromise pursis dated 26/8/2008 in this Court. The compromise pursis is accepted on record and marked as Exh. “Z”. The compromise pursis dated 26/8/2008 is signed by all the parties to the second appeal. The pursis is also signed by the learned counsel for the appellants and the respondent. All the parties to the second appeal are personally present in the Court today. The Court has specifically enquired with the appellants and the respondent on the terms of the compromise pursis. The appellants and the respondent are ad idem over the terms mentioned in the compromise pursis. The appellants have informed this Court that they have handed over the possession of three acres of land from field Survey 2 No. 86/1, 86/2 and 86/3 at village Parodhi, District Chandrapur, to the respondent towards full and final settlement of the respondent's claim. The respondent has also acknowledged in the Court that he has received the possession of 3 acres of land on 14/8/2008. Both the parties have informed the Court that the claim in the second appeal stands fully settled in view of the aforesaid terms mentioned in the compromise. The parties have further agreed to bear their respective costs. Since the parties are personally present in the Court today and have settled the claim in the second appeal in terms of the compromise pursis dated 26/8/2008, it is necessary to dispose of the second appeal in terms of the compromise. The terms of the compromise, according to me, are just and reasonable. The second appeal is, therefore, disposed of in terms of the compromise pursis dated 276/8/2008. A decree be drawn accordingly. JUDGE RMP