IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.9857 -M of 2011 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : NOVEMBER 2, 2011 PARAMJIT SINGH ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Sukhjit Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Satish Bhanot, Addl.AG, Punjab. Mr. Satnam Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 Separate replies on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2 have been filed in Court today, which are taken on record. 2 This petition has been filed under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, praying for quashing of FIR No.151 dated 31.12.2004 under Sections 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Ahmedgarh, District Sangrur (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings, on the basis of compromise dated 26.03.2011 (Annexure P-2). 3 The allegations made in the FIR are to the effect that petitioner-Paramjit Singh, Halqa Patwari, and co-accused changed the revenue record, so as to cause wrongful gain to Sanjeev Kumar. Criminal Misc. No.9857 -M of 2011 (O&M) 2 4 Since a public document has been forged, I do not deem it, in the interest of justice, to allow the petition for quashing, on the basis of compromise, particularly because the entire evidence has been led and concluded and the trial court is about to deliver the final verdict. 5 The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. NOVEMBER 2, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?