IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHA'ITISGARH AT BILASPUR Wm‘ t peti ti'on No. // ,/ / of'ZOOI Namdas Tandon S/o Dhansingh aged about 54 years resident of V111age T11a1‘ P.O. 'Padumtara Dist. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) pr‘es'entw posted as Rura1 Agricmtur‘e Extension officer at vfH’age T11a1‘ P.‘0. Padumtara Dist. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) PETITIONER ‘ Versus [l] State of Chhattisgarh /‘ V’ Enrougn Secretarx Department vex/’3 ”gi-8 agaa D.K. f Agr1cu1ture Bhawan Mantra1aya RESPONDENTS 46» «4‘ r \l \i":\ (u y, . ‘. /:;:$'ré¢‘}" . Raipur (C.G.) [2] DireCtor Agricmture Agricufture Department Rafpur (CsG.) Joint Director Agricuiture Agricuiture Department Raipur DiVision Raipur (C‘GJ [4] Deputy Director Agricuiture Coiiectorate Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ESE! Sheba Macikyc't Pradaik &:_\\g‘é\‘IODL\‘ O ’DHHHM,P.) } Twang?) a. Sacra 7 Dqmytw emt . 4% ‘MWJ Vw'qioh Bhwam Bhqpal; :f’ (Miro PETITION UNDER ARTICLE é26 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR A WRIT“ IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS ETC. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 1946 of 200 1 Petitioner : Namdas Tandon Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh 6r, others Single Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. Sim Shashank Dubey,‘ Senior counsel with Shri Neelab Dubey, counsel for the petitioner. Shn' G.D. Vaewani, Govt. Advocate for the State] respondents‘ o R A L o R D E R (28th July, 2006) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that in View of the statement made in para 6 of the return dated 31.1.2006, n1ed by the respondents, \the peh'tioner is not interested to pursue the matter further, pa1a 6 reads as unden- “It is, resPectfully, submitted on behalf of the answen'ng respondents that the petitioner did not submit his caste certiiicate, therefore, the caste of the petitioner was mentioned as “General”. Had the petitioner submitted his caste certificate, the omission occuning in the seniority list could have been mended. lt is, further, submitted that respondents are ready to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion from the year, 1998, if the petitioner, submits a Valid caste certihcate duly issued by the competent authority.” In View of the submission of the respondents stated in para 6, the petition stands disposed of. The respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner, Within a period of six Weeks, from the date the petitioner mes caste certificate. VT W: sd,_ a ‘ i Satish K.Agnihotri ‘ Judge (war i