IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12299 of 2009 1. RAJO DEVI, wife of Daso Rai. 2. DASO RAI, son of Late Sheodhari Rai. 3. RINKU RAI, son of Daso Rai. 4. MAMTA DEVI, wife of Julso Rai. All residents of Village Shivkund, P.O. Dharhara, District Munger ------Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 8.4.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The offence alleged against the petitioners, who are apprehending their arrest in connection with Kharagpur P.S. Case No.121 of 2008, is under section 498A of the Penal Code. Earlier the petitioners had approached this Court for grant of anticipatory bail, which was rejected vide order dated 18.12.2008 passed in Cr.Misc. No.42436 of 2008, as contained in Annexure 1 to the petition. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners are mother-in-law, father-in-law, Dewar and Gotani respectively. The petitioners have stated in paragraph 7 of the petition that the differences in the family was amicably settled and they had entered into a compromise and accordingly filed a petition and thereafter the victim lady is living with her husband along with the in- laws and on such consideration, the husband of the victim Pinku Rai was allowed bail as per the order dated 6.2.2009 passed in A.B. No.78/09 on the conditions mentioned in the order. Learned counsel submits that in the above circumstances, the petitioners, who are the 2 members of the in-laws’ family, deserve to be allowed anticipatory bail. The learned APP appearing on behalf of the State submits that the allegations are against all the accused persons. However, in view of the statement made in paragraph 7 of the petition, he is not in a position to refute the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioners. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioners no.1 to 4 above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Kharagpur P.S. Case No.121 of 2008, within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief judicial Magistrate, Munger, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)