IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.15 OF 2008 OF MOTION NO.15 OF 2008 OF MOTION NO.15 OF 2008 in in in CENTRAL CENTRAL CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO.1 OF 2008 EXCISE APPEAL NO.1 OF 2008 EXCISE APPEAL NO.1 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Central Excise,Thane-II .. Appellant Vs. M/s Pharmalink Laboratories ... Respondents Mr.A.S.Rao with Mr.S.D.Bhosale for Appellant None for Respondents CORAM CORAM CORAM : Dr.S.Radhakrishan and : Dr.S.Radhakrishan and : Dr.S.Radhakrishan and A.V.Nirgude, A.V.Nirgude, A.V.Nirgude, JJ JJ JJ DATE DATE DATE : 26th June, 2008 : 26th June, 2008 : 26th June, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. None appears for the respondents though served. By this Notice of motion the appellant is seeking condonation of 190 days delay caused in filing the appeal. For the reasons stated int he affidavit in supporot of the Notice of motion sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay and there is no case of inaction,negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the appellant. Hence, the Notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). { A.V.Nirgude, J } A.V.Nirgude, J } A.V.Nirgude, J } { Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J } Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J } Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J }