IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 22 OF 2009 SHRI. SHIVDAS SADANAND KAUTHANKAR PRESENTLY LODGED IN SUB JAIL SADA VASCO ... Petitioner Versus THE BICHOLIM URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD THROUGH MANAGER (RECOVERY) AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Rahul Satardekar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. R.G. Ramani, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 31st March, 2009 P.C.: Heard learned Counsel on behalf of both parties. Both the parties filed an application for compounding the offence and it has been submitted by Shri Ramani, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.1, that the dues payable to the complainant/respondent no.1 under the subject cheque has been received by the complainant and, as such, the complainant has no objection to compound the offence against the applicant/accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. 2. In view of the said application for compounding of offence filed by both the parties, the judgments below are hereby set aside ad the parties are permitted to compound the offence. Consequently, the applicant/accused shall now stand acquitted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. 3. Revision petition disposed of. Expedite authenticated copy. N. A. BRITTO, J. NH