IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT TUESDAY, THE 18TH MARCH 2008 / 28TH PHALGUNA 1929 Bail Appl..No. 1608 of 2008() ----------------------------- COMPLAINT BEFORE THE GURUVAUYUR POLICE STATION LODGED BY SMT.M.R.CHANDRIKA PETITIONER : ----------------- K. ARUN KUMAR, S/O.PROF.M.K.GANGHADARAN THE PROPRIETOR, M/S.HORIZON BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS NO.14/D1, MAHARAJA COMPLEX SOUTH NADA GURUVAUYUR-1. BY ADV. SRI.K.R.VINOD RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER GURUVAYUR POLICE STATION, GURUVAYUR. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.S.U.NAZAR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT, J ------------------------------------ B.A.No.1608 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of March, 2008 ORDER Application for anticipatory bail. Petitioner apprehends that the respondent/police may arrest him on the allegation raised by one M.R.Chandrika before the Guruvayur Police Station. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor after taking instructions submits that it is true that the said Chandrika had filed a complaint, but no crime has been registered on such complaint and the petitioner is not required to be arrested on those allegations. In these circumstances the learned Public Prosecutor submits that the apprehension of the petitioner is without any basis. This application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed, submits the learned Public Prosecutor. If, in future, the arrest of the petitioner becomes necessary in connection with any crime concerning offences, if any, committed against the said Chandrika prior to this date, sufficient prior notice shall be given to the petitioner and the prior permission of this Court shall be taken before effecting such arrest, submits the learned Public Prosecutor. B.A.No.1608 of 2008 2 3. The submissions of the learned Public Prosecutor are taken note and recorded. The undertaking given is also taken note of and accepted. It is now evident that there is no merit in the apprehension of the petitioner. This bail application is, in these circumstances, dismissed as agreed. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) rtr/-