IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH JANUARY 2009 / 24TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 1463 of 2009(Y) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ANILKUMAR, ASST.SALESMAN (UNDER SUSPENSION) MAVELISTORE, KALLIKKADU, TRIVANDRUM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.SREEJITH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD., REGIONAL OFFICE, PRS ROAD, THYCAUD, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE REGIONAL OFFICER, REGIONAL OFFICE, T.C.NO.24/469, PRS ROAD, THYCAUD, TRIVANDRUM-695014. ADV. SMT.MOLLY JACOB,SC,SUPPLYCO THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 1463 of 2009-Y - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 14th day of January, 2009. JUDGMENT The petitioner was holding the post of Assistant Salesman in a Maveli store under the respondents herein. He was placed under suspension as per Ext.P1 order dated 17.6.2008. Ext.P1 shows that a vigilance enquiry has also been ordered against him. The order of suspension was passed by the Regional Manager. Ext.P2 is a copy of the memo of charges issued against him and he has filed a reply as per Ext.P3. Presently, another memo of charges evidenced by Ext.P4 has been issued, for which also the petitioner has submitted Ext.P5 explanation. 2. According to the petitioner, he is innocent of the charges levelled against him in the respective memo of charges. Therefore, he has filed Ext.P6 representation for revocation of suspension. It is stated that the same has not been considered by the first respondent so far. 3. Heard learned Standing Counsel for the respondents also. There will be a direction to the first respondent to consider Ext.P6 and take a WPC 1463/2009 2 decision on the same in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/