IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE 13TH JULY 2010 / 22ND ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 21758 of 2010(T) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ 1. RENJITH N.V.,VATHAMKOLLY, MANNAMPATTA P.O.,SREEKRISHNAPURAM P.O., PALAKKAD. 2. P.NARAYANANKUTTY, VRINDAVAN, P.O.PARASSERY, KONGAD, BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,PALAKKAD. 2. J.FIROZ, F.R..MANZIL, MANALI ROAD, KALMANDAPAM,PALAKKAD-678 001. R1 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.21758 of 2010 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th July, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioners are existing stage carriage operators conducting services on the routes Muriyankannikadavu- Cherplassery-Palakkad and Cherplassery - Palakkad respectively. As per Ext.P1 judgment in WPC No.7655/2010, this Court has directed the disposal of an application for revision of timings submitted by the second respondent. According to the petitioners, the timings of the second respondent are not to be revised. Therefore, they have raised objections to the revision of his timings by submitting Exts.P2 and P3 before the first respondent. According to the petitioners, orders pursuant to Ext.P1 judgment have not been passed yet. Therefore, they pray for a consideration of their objections in Exts.P2 and P3 also while considering the request for revision of the second respondent's timings. 2. In the above circumstances, this Writ Petition is wpc No.21758/2010 2 disposed of directing the first respondent to consider the objections of the petitioners set out in Exts.P2 and P3 also while considering the request for revision of timings submitted by the second respondent, if the same has not already been considered and finally disposed of. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE css/