IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.18284 of 2010 RAMA NAND PRASAD SINGH s/o Late Ram Prasad Singh, R/o village- Munja, P.S.- Baikunthpur, District- Gopalganj …Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, 2. Tribhuwan Nath Prasad, s/o Late Rajendra Lal, resident of village-Faijullahpur, P.S.- Baikunthpur, District- Gopalganj, 3. Chandrama Tiwari s/o Late Mandhat Tiwari, resident of village- Khajuri, P.S. Panapur, District- Saran, 4. Shyamdeo Singh & 5. Surendra Singh both sons of Late Rajendra Singh R/o village- Munja, P.S. Baikunthpur, District- Gopalganj …Opposite Parties ----------- 2/ 02.02.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 13.02.2002 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Gopalganj, in C. Case No.1296 of 1993/ Tr. No.673 of 2010, by which he has dismissed the application filed under section 311 Cr. P. C. filed on behalf of the complainant, who is the petitioner here. The petitioner further prays for quashing of revisional order dated 29.01.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Fast Track Court No. III, Gopalganj, in C. Revision No.170 of 2002/ 123 of 2009, by which he has dismissed the application of the petitioner against the said order considering it to be interlocutory in nature. It appears that the petitioner had filed an application for calling for a certain document which was allegedly in possession of the accused persons and the court was of the view that under section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure it could not have been done since “person” did not include an accused. I am in full agreement with the Judicial Magistrate and, 2 therefore, seeing no merit in the application, the same is dismissed. In this case, I find that in the present case the petitioner filed application on 10.10.2001 for summoning a document under section 91 Cr. P. C. which was disposed of on 13.02.2002 and as against this, the petitioner filed a revision which was finally disposed of only on 29.01.2010 i.e. about eight years later which is unfortunate to say the least. The District and Sessions Judge, Gopalganj, is directed to hold a meeting of the Judicial Officers within his jurisdiction to ensure that such applications are not kept pending by the revisional courts and the trial court should proceed with the case in case no stay has been granted by the superior court. The application is dismissed. Let this order be communicated to the District and Sessions Judge, Gopalganj, for needful. JA/- ( Anjana Prakash,J.)