PETITIONER «sky v p (:x‘wn “I 3% 3§$Hg W mp BILAsPUR (CHHATTISGARHJ w.P. (s1 No. WW?7 of2011 / Ram Sai Ram S/o Bolwa Ram, aged about 55 years, posted as Head Master at Govt. Primary School Parsagudi, Block—Rajpur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS Block— Rajpur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) / 5. Amrendra Singh, Head Master Govt. Primary School, Markadand, Block-Rajpur, Distt. m Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. I BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT RESPONDENTS / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through- \w.“éw Secretary Department of School WWW \W Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Q 4N” M Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Collector, / Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) 3. / District Education Officer, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) Block Education Officer, HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 5043 0f2011 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shl'i Satish K Agnihotri. J. .{Vtx Present: Shn' Viplaw Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAL ,L (Passed on 3O day of August, 201 1) Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 15.07.2011 (Annexure P/ 1), whereby the petitioner working as Head Master, at Primary School, Parsagudhi, has been transferred to Primary School, Markadand, Rajpur. showing it to be on mutual basis. 2. Shri Shn'vastava, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner never made any request for his mutual transfer from the present place of posting. Thus, the impugled order to transfer the petitioner on the gound of mutual basis, is bad in law and does not come within the purview ol‘administrative exrgency. 3. Shri Thakur. learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State submits «L1 . that if it is so, appropriate shall be passed keeping in view the above infinnities in the impugned order. Till then, the impugied order dated 15.07.2011 (Annexure P/l) in respect ol‘the petitioner shall not be given eEect‘to. 4. In View of the above, according to learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication in this petition. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the aforestated observation. SATISH K. ANGNIHORI Judge Sd/- PETITIONER : Ram Sai Ram. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others.