IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28606 of 2009 1. YOGESH YADAV 2. Jitendra Yadav Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 18.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. A truck was looted. Its driver and khalasi were kidnapped, who later on succeeded to come out from the custody of the accused persons and on their alarm, some of the accused persons were chased and caught. They made confession also, but according to the learned counsel, none of them named this petitioner, rather one of the co-accused, vis. Upendra Yadav who had fled disclosed the petitioner’s name. Upendra Yadav is said co-villager of petitioners having enmity with them, but in the case a claim is made by the driver and khalasi of the truck to identify miscreants, who looted the truck. So, one of the nature of the evidence is identification in T.I. parade including others which never can be possible, if petitioners are allowed anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioners is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)