1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 27. WP/387/2010 (RAJENDRA JAGANNATH BHUTEKAR V/S JYOTI RAJENDRA BHUTEKAR ) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr.B.K.Patil, Adv., h/f Mr.Hemant Surve, Adv.,for the petitioner. Mrs. C.E.Gaikwad, Adv., for respondent. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:12/10/2010 1. Heard. In a controversy between spouses, proceedings under Section 10 of Hindu Marriage Act are initiated by the husband. An application was moved by the wife in terms of Section 24 thereof for interim alimony. The learned Judge, on re-assessment of the facts, after remand found, the capabilities of the petitioner/husband to pay an amount of Rs.3000/- per month as interim maintenance to the wife and also Rs.720/- towards travelling allowance. This observations of the learned Judge, Family Court, Aurangabad, were in 2 tune with the documentary evidencee prima facie tendered before it. Had it been a case, that the writ petitioner/ husband was merely earning Rs.1500/- as is tried to be demonstrated, there was no good reason for him to have entered into purchase transaction of agricultural land Gat No.29 dt. 20th July, 2007, for an amount of Rs.2,50,000/-. That apart, the record illustrates, the writ petitioner has immoveable property from which he has good yield of income. It may be, primarily, to dodge the contentions of the wife, a ruse of dissolution of the partnership way back 29.2.2008 is created. It will not change colour and complexion of the matter to the extent of primary income of the writ petitioner. 2. The other grievance of the writ petitioner is, the wife is unnecessarily dragging the proceedings. The concept of taking up matrimonial matters expeditiously will be taken note of by the learned Judge, Family 3 Court at Aurangabad, and he will ensure to dispose of the ongoing proceedings within six months from receiving the communication. Both the parties to cooperate with the learned Judge. This Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the matrimonial proceedings. Writ petition lacks merit, hence disposed of in above terms. No costs. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/387-10wp