OJWJL! w^t. ti. ^.. c ^' .^^ ^ IN THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmONJio. *7^ 4-^ /2006 PETITIONERS ^/l. Ku. Savita Sahu, Daughter of Shri Ledgaram Sahu, aged about 37 years, Village Bithia, Post Beldar Seoni, Kharora, District Raipur (C.G.). -^^>, .....„,., „._ »„„„,„. ^.-^' •..l;'''.••••''' "' 2. Kishanlal Verma, Son of Tika ' ffk^^ ^^ 'f- .-•••"'^l^''" ••°'•.•^"A^ wtr ^^.••' (-'{ •s-Tr? fe^ „ ^.^CT'" t0 "• RESPONDENTS :tOMM/^ y^~<"^ Ram Verma, aged about 37 years, resident of VUlage Tohra, District Raipur (C.G.). 3. Katyani Tikriha, wtfe of Shri Kishor Kumar, aged about 37 years, resident of Village - Sankara, District Raipur(C.G.). VERSUS ^ l. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Education Department (Ministry), D.K.S. Bhawan, G.E.Road, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Deputy - Director of Public Institution, Education Department, Post Office - Pension Bada, Arvind Nagar Ward, Raipur (C.G.). 3. Block Education OfRcer, Govemment of Chhattisgarh, Education Departinent, Post - Tilda, District-Raipur(C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 /3Sy OF THE ^ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ^) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ I^tition (S) No. 7648 of 2006 Petitionere : Ku. Savita Sahu & others Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and others SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Present: Shri, Alok Nigam, counset for the petitioners. Ms. Deepali Pandey, P.L. for the respondents/State. ORDER (Passed on 21st Day of February, 2< 7) It is submittsd that the facts and question of taw involved in the prssent petition are same to that of in Ram Sahay Jha Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others (Originat Apptication No. 15/1995). The Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur, by its judgment and order dated 16/2/19^, allowed the application ofthe petitionertherein. Learned counset for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to approach the respondente/State for consideration and disposal of the petitioners case in terms of the order dated 16/2/1996 passed in the case of Ram Sahay Jha (Supra) by Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur. Learned counsel appearing for the respondente/State fairiy agrees witti the submissions made by learned counsel for e petitioners. 3. Accordingly, the petitioners are granted liberty to make a representation before the respondente-State Authorities for their decision on the representation in the light of the order dated 16/2/1996 passed in the case of Ram Sahay Jha (Supra), in accordance with law, on its own merit, within reasonabletime. 4. With the above-stated liberty, this petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. ——— Sd/- Satish K. Agaifcstei Judge