Civil Revision No. 254 of 2010 -1- *** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 254 of 2010 Date of Decision: February 10, 2010 Udey Singh ….Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others. …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. S.D. Anand, J. The learned Trial Court, vide impugned order dated 28.1.2009, directed that the 50% of the amount (deposited by the State) as compensation payable to the petitioners herein in respect of the acquisition of land of the law shall be disbursed to the petitioners herein against security; while the balance amount shall be disbursed without any security. In granting that order, the learned Presiding Officer was swayed by the statement made by the judgment debtors an appeal (against the impugned order) is pending Civil Revision No. 254 of 2010 -2- *** before this Court. On that premise, the judgment debtors had requested that the payment may be released against security. In view of the position apparent from the impugned order itself that there is no no stay order granted (in the context of disbursement of compensation amount) granted by this Court, the impugned order qua imposition of rider of security is indefensible. A similar matter came up before a Coordinate Bench ( Ajay Kumar Mittal, J.) of this Court in Civil Revision No. 3912 of 2009 ( Samay Singh Vs. State of Haryana and others) and the order granted by the learned Additional District Judge was invalidated by this Court, vide order dated 12.10.2009. In the light thereof and in view of the view obtained by this Court, the petition shall stand allowed. The impugned order shall stand set aside. The amount of compensation deposited in the Court shall be disbursed to the land owners whose land had been acquired. The petition shall stand disposed of accordingly. February 10, 2010 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE