WPMS No. 1591 of 2001 (Old No. 29512 of 2000) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Heard Mr. Nand Prasad, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Mr. Pankaj Miglani, learned counsel for respondent No. 2. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, learned counsel for respondent No. 2 conceded that the respondent No. 2 shall not claim any back wages as well as the cost of litigation. Learned Standing Counsel for the State has submitted that the respondent No. 2 shall be reinstated and shall be allowed to work in view of this concession made by learned counsel for respondent No. 2. In view of these statements made by learned counsels for both the parite4s, the writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (P.C. Verma, A.C.J.) Dt. 10.06.2004 G