IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.61606-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION:01.12.2006 Anoop ..........Petitioner Versus Stae of Haryana ..........Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present:- Shri Sanjeev Kadian, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Partap Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana. **** Petitioner Anoop apprehending his arrest in a non-bailable offence in case FIR No. 307 dated 27.7.2006 under Sections 365/342/506 IPC, registered at Police Station City Hansi, District Hisar, has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail. I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the FIR. Counsel for the petitioner contends that co-accused of the petitioner, namely, Vakash @ Vikey, Vijay Bohar & Sunil Beri and Sandeep Kajla, against whom there are similar allegations, have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court. Counsel for the petitioner further contends that in view of the order dated 17.10.2006, the petitioner has joined the investigation. Counsel for the respondent-State does not dispute the factum of joining of investigation by the petitioner as well as the fact that the co-accused of the petitioner, namely, Vakash @ Vikey, Vijay Bohar & Sunil Beri and Sandeep Kajla, against whom there are similar allegations, have been granted Crl. Misc. No.61606-M of 2006 -2- anticipatory bail by this Court. In view of the above, the interim bail, granted vide order dated 17.10.2006 is made absolute subject to the same terms and conditions. Disposed of accordingly. December 01, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) pooja JUDGE