1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.5259 OF 2004 M/s.Hira Investments Pvt. Ltd. : Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. : Respondents ... Mr.V.K.Mourya for the petitioner. Mr.S.K.Chinchalikar, Asstt. Govt. Pleader, for the respondent nos.1 to 4. Mr.V.D.Patil for the respondent no.6. ... CORAM : S.A. BOBDE, J. September 29, 2005. P.C.: 1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr.Chinchalikar, learned Asstt. Govt. Pleader, for the respondent nos.1 to 4, and Mr.Patil, learned counsel for the respondent no.6, appear and waive service of rule. Heard by consent. 2. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 18.6.2004 by which the State Minister (Co-operation) 2 vacated the interim order 5.4.1999, pending revision. 3. Mr.Patil, the learned counsel for the respondent no.6 Chief Promoter of the proposed society, states that the impugned order may be set aside and stay may be granted. He further submits that it would be expedient, in the interest of justice, that the revision application itself be decided by the learned Minister within a fixed time. 4. In the circumstances, having regard to the fact that the revision is pending for a period of about six years, it is directed that the revision be decided within a period of eight weeks from the date the parties appear before the authority. The parties are directed to appear before the authority on 10.10.2005. 5. The rule is disposed of in the above terms. S.A. BOBDE, J.