^ IN THEiIONLBLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) No. 3 / 2011 PETITONER ^ ^y '^" RESPONDENT Smt. Aradhana Sharma, aged ^•^\ about 26 years, wife of Shri ><<'iA.^*\.-^ Kavindra Sharma, R/o. Kapil Nagar, Sarkanda, Tahsil & District Bilaspur (C.G.) .•••^-'•\y" 'y VERSES Ravindra Sharma, aged about 31 years, son of Shri J.L. Sharma, R/o.Jora Talab Road, Near the resident of Rtd. R.I. Chandra, Jorapara Sarkanda, Tah. And District Bilaspur (C.G.) TRANSFER PETITION UNDER SECTION 24 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE,1908 ^) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BILASPUR TRANSFER PETITSOM (C6VIU N0. 3/2011 PETiTIONER RESPONDENT Smt. Aradhana Sharma Versus Ravindra Sharma TRANSFER PETITION UNDER SECTION 24 OF CODE OF CIV!LPROCEDURE.19Q8 (Slnale Bench: Hon'ble Shri N.K. Aaarwal. J.l Present : Shri Atanu Ghosh, counsel for the petitioner. ORALORDER (Passed on 14th day of February, 2011) Heard. 2. The instant petition has been preferred for transfer of divorce case from Fami!y Court, Katghora, District Korba to Fami!y Court, Bilaspur. 3. Having heard learned counse! for the petitioner and having perused the record, ! do not find any substance in the petition. According to petitioner, Famiiy Court, Katghora has no territoriai jurisdjction to try the divorce petitlon filed by the respondent. Further, the petitloner being a poor lady, It wiil be very difficult for herto attend the iegai proceedings at Katghora. 4. So far as the question of territorial jurisdjction of the Famijy Court, Katghora is concerned, the same can be raised by the petitioner before the Famliy Court, Katghora as per the statutory provjslons. So far as the second contention raised by the petitioner is concemed, in an appropriate case, the respondent may be directed to bear her expenses by the Famiiy Court. 5. In view of above, the petjtion faiis is liabie to be and Is hereby dismissed. Sd/- N.K.Agarwal Judge l<^