IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.l379 of 2006 Ramesh Alva .. petitioner vs Commissioner of Police and ors.. respondents Mrs V B Thadani with Mr V Thadani for petitioner Mr S.R.Nargolkar AGP for respondents CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & V.R.KINGAOKAR JJ. V.R.KINGAOKAR JJ. V.R.KINGAOKAR JJ. DATED 23.3.2006 DATED 23.3.2006 DATED 23.3.2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. l. This petition can be conveniently disposed of by granting amended prayer clause (c-l) of the petition. The petitioner has sought intervention of this court so that the application dated 25.l.2006 to the Commissioner of Police, Navi Mumbai can be decided. 2. The learned AGP Mr.Nargolkar submitted that unless reply is filed, the petition may not be taken up for hearing. We have rejected this contention inasmuch as the only relief which we are granting relates to the consideration of the application filed by the petitioner before the concerned police authority. The administrative decision may be taken by the Commissioner of Police in accordance with law. 3. Consequently, Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (c-l) of the petition. Petition is disposed of, accordingly. 4. It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion as regards the merits of the matter. (V.G.Palshikar J) (V.R.Kingaokar J)