Crl. Misc. No. M-6751 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-6751 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 4.3.2011 Gulu @ Vipin Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. K.V. Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Rajan Gupta, J. (oral) This is a petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking pre- arrest bail in a case registered against the petitioner under Sections 323, 186, 353, 427, 148, 149 IPC and Section 307 IPC added later on, at Police Station GRP, Ludhiana, vide FIR No.17 dated 26th January, 2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. Even injury attracted offence under Section 307 IPC is not attributed to him. He is, thus, entitled to concession of pre-arrest bail. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and given careful thought to the facts of the case. The FIR was lodged on the complaint of D.S. Garcha, Excise and Taxation Officer, Ludhiana-II who stated that on 26th January, 2011 at about 12.45 A.M. he was present along with staff at Railway Station, Ludhiana in vehicle No. PB-10 AM-0039. They saw Crl. Misc. No. M-6751 of 2011 certain vehicles loaded with hosiery goods and gave a signal to them to stop. Instead of stopping the vehicles, they fled towards the railway station at a high speed. One of the vehicles struck against the official vehicle. The accused thereafter gave Danda blows to the ETO. The driver of the vehicle Jarnail Singh was thrown on the railway line with intention to kill him, due to which offence under Section 307 IPC was included in the FIR. In view of the nature of allegations levelled in the FIR, I am of the considered view that petitioner is not entitled to concession of pre-arrest bail. The petition is without any merit. The same is hereby dismissed. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 4.3.2011 'rajpal'