<L^ l€rz^ ^ S*^S.^f j.C«:j!|!SS^ ^•Mi^^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARHAT BILASPUR fC.G.) WRIT PETITION fS) N0. \TS>^ OF 2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ,<?^^ c* y-<.'{>:'"\-0.- ^fc^^' V^'VA.--"' Nagendra Singh Son of Late Shri Shambhu Singh, aged about 59 years, working as a Headmaster, Govt. Primary School Baigapara, Janakpur, District Koriya (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through: ^ the Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). ^••^" s 1?^' -Au': ^...-'' ^.-' 2. The Commissioner, Tribal Development, Raipur (C.G.). 3. The Collector, Baikunthpur, District Koriya (C.G.). 4. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Baikunthpur, District Koriya (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIQN OE1NDIA 1. PARTICUU\RS OF THE PETITIONER As given in the cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS As given in the cause title. .sBes&XS iK3*5"" HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER WRIT PETITION (S) N0.17340F 2010 Nagendra Singh Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others Gowri RESPONDENTS (Writ Petition underArticie 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri V.K. Pandey, Advocate forthe petitioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate forthe State. ORDER(ORAU (Passed on this 19th day ofApri!, 2010) Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the is$ue involved in this case is squareiy covered by the judgment and order dated 9<h October, 2006 passed by this Court in W.P. (S) No.5473 of 2006 (Rakesh Kumar Sharma & Another v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others). In view of the above, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation forconsideration of his case by the concerned authority in the light of the above stated judgment and order dated 9th October, 2006. It is directed that in the event a representation is made by the petitioner, the same shall be considered in accordance with law, on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 10 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. r sd/- 1 SatishK.Agnihotn 2. 3.