IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6661 of 2008 RAN VIJAY PRATAP SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 22.8.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No.174/2004 for the alleged offences registered under section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that during the trial of the chargesheeted accused, the informant had categorically stated that his daughter died on account of natural death and not on account of any poisoning or assault by the members of the in-law’s family and accordingly chargesheeted accused were acquitted by judgment dated 12th of November, 2007, vide Annexure 2. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State on perusal of the case diary submits that the petitioner at the material time was absconding. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was in the service 2 of the Indian Army and was on duty in Jammu and Kashmir as stated in paragraph no.7 of the petition. Considering the submissions, as noticed above, it is directed that petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No.174/2004 within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)