IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.R.No.1093 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 11, 2010 Sombir .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Dhiraj K.Sammi, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Argues that petitioner had already moved application under Section 216 Cr.P.C. before learned Sessions Judge, Gurgaon, for amendment of charge through Public Prosecutor, however, the same was not even entertained and no order was passed on the same. Further argues that petitioner will be satisfied if learned Sessions Judge is directed to entertain the application under Section 216 Cr.P.C. filed by petitioner through Public Prosecutor for amendment of charge and decide the same. Hence, the present petition is disposed of with direction to learned Sessions Judge, Gurgaon to entertain the application of the petitioner filed under Section 216 Cr.P.C. through Public Prosecutor for amendment of charge and decide the same on merits. Copy of the order be given dasti. 11.5.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge