... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.362 OF 2004 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri P.D. Dalvi for the Appellant. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : JULY 20, 2006. : JULY 20, 2006. : JULY 20, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Shri Dalvi appearing for the Appellant. The Appellant is the original Plaintiff. 2. Finding of the Appellate Court is that father of the Appellant was holding ancestral property and he sold the property during his life time in favour of the Defendant No.4. The finding of the Appellate Court is that the Appellant and the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 being the daughters of the deceased father could not have claimed any right, title and interest in the ancestral property during the life time of the father. The father had executed a Will in favour of the Defendant No.4 in ... 2 ... respect of which the probate has been granted after contest by the Appellant-Plaintiff. 3. In this view of matter, no substantial question of law arises. Second Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE