IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8776 of 2010 RAMOTAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 12.03.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioner, who is an accused in a case instituted under diverse Sections of the Penal Code including Section 302 of the Penal Code lodged sometimes in the year 2002, has approached this Court for grant of anticipatory bail. F.I.R. would show that petitioner and others, in the dead night, captivated the son of the informant and took him away. Following morning the dead body was recovered. It further discloses that earlier to this the accused persons had committed murder of the nephew of the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was, in fact, not present in the village on the relevant date and time of the occurrence. It is next submitted that investigation is still going on. This Court finds from the impugned order that charge sheet was submitted against the other accused persons. The matter was kept pending against him as the petitioner absconded. Considering the allegations and the materials available on record as reflected from the impugned order, in my view, no case for anticipatory bail is made out. Prayer for anticipatory bail is, accordingly, rejected. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)