IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16011 of 2010 1. RAM CHANDRA RAI S/O LATE RAGHUVEER RAI R/O VILL.- RAMJICHAK, P.S.- DIGHA, DISTT.- PATNA ---- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. COLLECTOR, PATNA 3. ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, PATNA 4. DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND REFORMS, DANAPUR 5. CIRCLE OFFICER, DANAPUR 6. NIRALA SAHKARI GRIH NIRMAN SAMITI LIMITED KUMHRAR, PATNA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, SATYANARAYAN SINHA NAGAR, PATNA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY SATYANARAYAN SINGH, S/O LATE JAI NANDAN SINGH, P.O.- KESHARI NAGAR, P.S.- SHASTRI NAGAR, DISTT.- PATNA ---- RESPONDENTS. ----------- 03 04.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the State and the private respondent. Nobody has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner raises a grievance with respect to order dated 25.05.2010, passed by respondent no.3, in Mutation revision case no. 08 of 2003-04 (Annexure-4), whereby the revision preferred by respondents was considered and allowed. The revisional Court set aside the order dated 25.05.2003, passed by respondent Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Danapur in appeal no. 23 of 2002-03. It appears that claiming his title and possession on the strength of 04 sale deeds, respondents herein approached the respondent Circle Officer for mutation of their name(s). The same was allowed by order dated 23.01.2003 (Annexure 1). It appears that 04 cases were instituted vide Mutation case nos. 1046, 1047, 1048 and 1049 of 2002-03. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order the writ petitioner filed one appeal which was considered and allowed by 2 respondent DCLR vide order dated 22-05- 2003(Annexure-2). Aggrieved over the said order respondents preferred revision which has been allowed by the order impugned (Annexure-4). It is well settled law that mutation neither creates title nor extinguishes it. The aggrieved party, in such circumstance, may approach the Court of competent civil jurisdiction seeking appropriate remedy. Any observation with regard to title made in the order, in that event, shall not prejudice him. The petitioner, therefore, would be at liberty to approach the appropriate Court of competent civil jurisdiction for ventilation of his grievance. The application stands disposed of. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)