IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14626 of 2010 AKANKSHA KUMARI & ORS . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 02. 09.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the Bihar School Examination Board (hereinafter referred to as the Board). The petitioners are students of the Session 2008-10 Inter course of the degree college at Bagha. This Court in C.W.J.C. No. 14321 of 2009 found it peculiar that the institution was stated to have recognition for the Session 2006-08/2007-09, but the fees and Forms of the students for the Intermediate examination Session 2008- 10 was not being accepted. The writ was disposed with directions to the Director of the Board to pass appropriate orders in light of the discussion contained in the order. The fresh order dated 26.11.2009 of the Director, declining relief was set aside in C.W.J.C. No. 17101 of 2009. That order noticed the inter se fight between respondent no.6 as the petitioner therein and the intervenor therein for the post of Principal. Both claiming that they alone were competent to forward the O.M.R. Forms of the candidate to the Board. This Court expressed its anguish for the genuine students in the fight for supremacy for the post of Principal between the respondent no.6 and the intervenor. It was also noticed 2 that the conduct of the Board was hardly conducive to aiding academic environment. The matter was remanded to the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department to resolve the issue with directions for issuance of O.M.R. Forms to the genuine students. An order dated 4.2.2010 then came to be passed by the Principal Secretary, in favour of the respondent no.6, holding that the Forms forwarded by him were the genuine students. The rival Principal/ Intervenor then filed C.W.J.C. No. 2573 of 2010. It questioned the order dated 4.2.2010, in context of the fight, for the post of Principal. The petitioner has been admitted for hearing and the operation of the order dated 4.2.2010 has been stayed. The respondent no.6 then filed L.P.A. No. 411 of 2010 against the interim order in C.W.J.C. No. 2573 of 2010. The Division Bench directed the respondent Board to examine the cases of genuine students and permit them to appear at the examination. Respondent no.6 and the Intervenor were prevented from being even present during the inspection. The respondent Board then identified the present petitioners and issued Admit Cards to them. They have appeared at the final examination of Class-XII for the Session 2008-10 and seek the direction for publication of their results. 3 Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted from the order dated 4.2.1010 that the Principal Secretary had, in any event continued the operation of his order for the Session 2008-10 only. Thereafter the institution, whether it be respondent no.6 or rival claimant have to seek and fight their own battle for the supremacy with which the present petitioner/students are not concerned. Learned counsel for the Board submits that the Board shall comply with all consequential actions necessary in light of L.P.A. No. 411 of 2010. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is apparent that the order dated 4.2.2010, operation of which has been stayed, is confined to the issue of recognition of the rival claiming Principal. It has nothing to do with the genuineness of the students under one Principal or the other. The genuine students was required to be identified as observed by the Writ Court and directed by the Appellate Bench. The genuine students have been identified. They have appeared at the examination. This Court is satisfied that they cannot be allowed to suffer. The stay of the operation of the order dated 4.2.2010 has been diluted by the Division Bench in 4 L.P.A. No. 411 of 2010, giving appropriate scope for issuance of directions for publication of the results of the petitioners. Let the results of the present petitioners be published. If any others claim to be similarly situated and approach the Board for similar relief, the Board is under a bounden obligation to examine each individual case and pass reasoned orders in accordance with law for publication or non-publication as the case may be within a maximum period of three weeks from the date of receipt/production of such application by it. The Court consider it necessary to incorporate this part of the direction, so that this Court is not flooded with a series of litigation for primarily what are matters to be examined by the Board itself, and directing individual students to obtain individual orders from the Court. The application stands allowed. P.K. ( Navin Sinha, J.)