IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH JULY 2009 / 24TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 19932 of 2009(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- TINA KRISHNAN ,PROPRIETOR, ANJALI POULTRY FARM,MATTATHUKAD P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.S.ANIL KUMAR (TRIVANDRUM) SRI.K.S.HARIHARAN NAIR RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, MANNARKKAD,PALAKKAD. 2. THE DY.COMMISSIONER (APPEALS),ERNAKULAM. 3. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR),TALUK OFFICE, MANNARKKAD,PALAKKAD. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV. MR. C.K. GOVINDAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ........................................................................ W.P.(C) No. 19932 OF 2009 ......................................................................... Dated this the 15th July, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner, who is aggrieved of Ext.P1 order passed by the first respondent, has approached the appellate authority by filing Ext. P2 memorandum of appeal along with Ext. P3 petition for stay. The cause of action projected in this Writ Petition is that the third respondent has moved the machinery under the Revenue Recovery Act against the petitioner, without any regard to the pendency of the proceedings before the second respondent/appellate authority. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances, the second respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext. P2 appeal as well as Ext. P3 petition for stay, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. It is made clear that till such orders are passed on Ext. P3 petition for stay, all further W.P.(C) No. 19932 OF 2009 2 coercive steps pursuant to Ext.P4 shall be kept in abeyance. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk