FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2884 OF 1991 (Madhusudan Ramgopal Bharuka Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr) ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Mr. P.F. Patni, advocate for petitioner Mr. V.H. Dighe, A.G.P. for respondents. ..... Mr. Patni, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from his client, submits that in view of the subsequent events, which took place after filing of the petition, this petition has become infructuous. In the result, writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. Rule discharged. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) Date:06.01.2010. rlj/