IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-24926 of 2008 Date of Decision: November 12, 2008 Arshad … Petitioner Versus State of Haryana. … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present : Mr. R.S. Rai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karan Pathak, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Mor, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Satish Chaudhary, Advocate, for the complainant. S.D. Anand, J. It is argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the entire prosecution presentation is denuded of truthfulness inasmuch as it is quite unnatural to accept that the prosecutrix, a married female aged 27 years and a mother of 8 months old child, would have gone to sleep at her house without bolting the door from inside. The learned counsel also finds fault with the fact that though the impugned incident which had Crl. Misc. No.M-24926 of 2008 allegedly taken place on the night intervening 16/17.02.2008, she notified the police only on 26.02.2008. The petition shall stand allowed accordingly. It is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner by the arresting officer, he shall be released on bail subject to the following conditions:- i) that he shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; ii) that he shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iii) that he shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. Disposed of accordingly. November 12, 2008 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 2