c. (p \.^]^ ^- S8NQLE BENCH IN THE HON'BLE HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.fS)NO. ;a>&^- /2010 PETITIONER ^^,^>- '^•^.••- / ^^y ^ ^^^^ ^yy ^.--•" ^ Smt. Nalim tsashyap W/o Jamima Prasad kashy^) Aged about 65 years Retired Headmaster R/o Near Bishamber Bada ward no.7 Baloda Bazar DistrictRaipur (C.G.) Present Address: C/o Premlata Venna Staff Nurse Near P.H.C. Bjlha Post- BilhaDistrictBilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh fhroiigh Secretary, Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipiu- (C.G.) ^' . ! . ' ' . 2. District Education Of&cer, Dissi: Raipur (C.G) 3. Block education Officer, BalodaBazarDisst: Raipur(C.G.) ^' Office, 4. Accomitant General Raipur,Disst:Raipiir(C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION QF INDIA ^^^-^s^ 3TT^T ^TT f<-lJch 'cT^TT 3Ty^?T ^^icD '3^ ^ni<n^ ^tTl^^Ko, [®i<nH^< ^-^....toPi.?.^.-...'31.?..?!.!.^ *<MCTI ^^i^ r -^ 200 ^TI^T^^ (^l^^T) ^^ITW^T[ 3TT^T SB : h'on'bie Shri rvlanindra Fvlon <=M4if<n4ITi Tm^ff ^ feTst <p3i^i< ^3tRR3T?^?T an Shrjvastava. J. 26-07-2010 Shri Deepak Jain, counsei Shri Ajit Singh, Panel Lavw) Shri 3.3. Rajput, Standing With the consent of iearned heard finaliy. This case peilains to griev^ retiiai dues. Learned counsell instructions, submits that the rnat^ Retirai Dues Comrnlttee. This Court, in W.P.No.484^ of Chhattisgarh & others) and c| Committee to consider the mal question of facts were invoivea'. State Govemment, pursuant to tij W.P.No.1961/2006 (Smt.Kela Sa| Chhattisgart) and othef's), and| M.C.C. No.105 of 2008 (Stete o^ Mandal arid anoiFTer). Thus, thj| judgment and order dateci W.P.No.4842/2004 (Baijnath Ma?i counsej appearing for the parties. |or the petitioner. ^r for the State/respondents No/i to 3, ^ounsei for respondent No.2. counsel for the pailies, the petition is (nce arising on accoui^t of non-grant of appearing for tSie petitioner, on |er rnay be referred to the High Power ;/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State ther connected matters, directed the ter of retriaj dues as the Qlsputed he Committee was constituted by the le order dated 13-OS-2006 passed in Chandf'aksr Vs. Smte GovBrnmerft of order dated 13-3-2008 passed In Chha sgBrh and others Vs. Baijnath > petition is squareiy covered by the 31st january, 2008 passed in idai (supra) as submitted by iearned .^^. ^.•^^^ ... ys^-^ ^ "^^./ '"^^XI-HG-78 ^n^T^Tf^ThF QW[± ~?^r ^ii^Krt^, ^t{l<ri^<o, f®i<ni^^< *11*(^(T^i^|eb ^vu? '^S^j^ '"^ 200 3^?T T^RT (^f^^T) ITCT^R-^-cT a^T^T -^- This petition Ss accordingiyl office of the Advocate Generai Committee, within a period of 15 ^i this order. Thereafter, the Comm|tee and officers concerned within Cornmittee shaii consiuer and pa^ affordjng proper opportunity of h^c and the officers concerned may fj The entire exercise, inciuding p| petitSoner, be cornpieted within a receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shaii suppjy'l State counsei as vveji as court transferring the sarne to the Cornrfiittee cM^fcn^ll '^T^ff "^f fe^ Tf^T^R ^3:JfW37T^T disposed of in the same terms i.e., the is directed to send the case to the iays from the date of receipt of copy of shall issue notlce to the petitioner a further period of 15 'days. The >s order, in accordance with iaw, afier ^aring to the petitioner. The petitioner ie additionai docuiTients, if necessary. ryment of retirai dues, if any, to the ^eriod of four months from the date of one complete set of the petition to the sei for the Accountant General for Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge