SPA No. 45 of 2008 Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Sri V.K. Bisht, Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Sudhir Singh, learned counsel for the appellant, Sir J.P. Joshi, learned Chief Standing Counsel for respondents no. 2 and Sri Arvind Vashistha with Sri Sanjay Bhatt, learned counsel for respondent no. 1 and 3. This special appeal preferred under Chapter IX Rule 10 of the High Court Rules, challenging the order dated 09.04.2008, passed by learned single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No. 623 (M/S) of 2008, whereby said writ petition is dismissed on the ground that statutory remedy is available to the petitioner and election process cannot be interfered with in view of the provisions contained in Article 243-ZG of the Constitution. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after going through the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge, we do not find any sufficient reason to interfere with the impugned order. The order passed by learned Single Judge is in the spirit of Article 243-ZG of the Constitution, which bars interference by the Courts in electoral matters. Section 19(1)(C) of the U.P., Municipalities Act, 1916, permits a person to challenged election on the ground his nomination is wrongly rejected. For the reasons as discussed above, the appeal is dismissed summarily. (Interim Relief Application No. 1966 of 2008 also stands dismissed.) (D.V.,J) (P.C.P.,J.) 11.04.2008 NS