IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18086 of 2010 1. NAND SINGH 2. HARAY GOVIND SINGH 3. RANA SANGRAM SINGH @ PINTU SINGH ------------------------ PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 4.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Maintainability of anticipatory bail is doubted on behalf of prosecution on the ground that petitioners were allowed bail at earlier stage which was cancelled by the Sessions Judge, validity of which was questioned by petitioners in quashing side but no illegality was found and petitioners were directed to surrender and pray for bail in regular side that they are bound to follow. In my view also the only relief to the petitioners can be given in regular side that also after their surrender in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in G.R.No.1037/96, Tr.No.1013/09 arising out of Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 53/96. Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioners is rejected. However, petitioners’ prayer for bail shall be decided on its own merit without being prejudiced by any rejection order. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)