IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16246 of 2011 Rana Arun Kumar Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 23.06.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the owner of the vehicle is apprehending his arrest in connection with Agamkuan P.S. Case No. 216 of 2010 registered under Sections 420 and 406 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that Suraj Prasad driver and cleaner Umesh Rai took the goods on the truck of the petitioner but it could not reach the consignee place. Initially it was informed that due to no entry of heavy traffic but subsequently the goods did not reach. Subsequently it was gathered that the petitioner is being owner of the vehicle contrived in the offence. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that goods have been subsequently recovered and the petitioner was not present on the place of occurrence nor he was entrusted with the goods and driver Suraj Prasad has been granted bail by 2 this court vide Cr. Misc. No. 45437 of 2010 on 17.03.2011. I see no reason for the learned court below not to give the same privilege to the petitioner and try to dispose off the regular bail application of the petitioner if possible on the same day if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within a period of four weeks from today. With this observation, this application is disposed off. Let the order be faxed to the learned A.C.J.M., Patna City in connection with Agamkuan P.S. Case No. 216 of 2010 at the cost of the petitioner. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)