IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. NO. 6833 OF 2009 DECIDED ON : 10.12.2009 Sunita Rani and another ...Petitioners versus Om Parkash and another ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present : Ms. Monisha Lamba, Advocate, for the petitioners. SABINA, J. (ORAL) The petitioners-plaintiffs have filed a suit for specific performance. Vide the impugned order, the suit of the plaintiffs qua defendant No.1 was dismissed as his correct address had not been furnished. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners, I am of the opinion that the instant petition is devoid of any merit and deserves dismissal. The impugned order was passed on 06.09.2006. However, there is no cogent explanation as to why the revision petition has been filed after such a long delay. Admittedly, now the case is listed for rebuttal evidence of the plaintiffs and arguments. It appears that the revision petition has now been filed with a view to delay the proceedings before the trial Court. No ground for interference is made out. Dismissed. DECEMBER 10, 2009 (SABINA) shalini JUDGE