IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 3950 of 2009 Between: Md. Khaleel Khan S/o. Late Jaleel Khan R/o. H.No. 19-4-340/54/22/1, Kishen Bagh, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad. 2 The Station House Officer, P.S. Rajender Nagar. 3 Hadi (Major) S/o. not known to the petitioner C/o. Sagar Travels, H.No. 15-5-824, Beside Raj Towers, Afzal Gunj, Hyderabad. 4 Shaik Noor Ahmed @ Shaik Ahmed (Major) S/o. not known to the petitioner R/o. H.No. 19-4-340, 9/6/A, Owaisi Colony, Kishan Bagh, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ or order/s more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent Nos. 1 & 2 in registering any crime and taking action against the respondent Nos. 3 & 4 as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.VENKATA MAYUR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : O R D E R:- The case of the petitioner is that his brother, Sayeed Khan is working as Cleaner and the 4th respondent as Driver in the bus belonging to the 3rd respondent. While so, at the instance of the 3rd respondent, the petitioner’s brother along with the 3rd and 4th respondents went to Sabarimalai in the bus on 8.1.2009. It is his case that even though the bus returned from Sabarimalai on 24.1.2009, his brother did not return. When he made enquiries with respondent Nos. 3 and 4 about the whereabouts of his brother, they remained silent spectators and did not disclose his whereabouts. Then, the petitioner, on 25.2.2009, lodged a complaint to respondent Nos.1 and 2 against respondent Nos.3 and 4 with regard to the missing of his brother, but his grievance is that respondent Nos.3 and 4 have not registered any crime against the culprits. The 2nd respondent filed counter affidavit stating that based on the complaint filed by the petitioner, he registered a case in Cr.No.204 of 2009 on the file of Rajendranagar Police Station for the offence punishable under Section 363 IPC, another case in Cr.No.86 of 2009 was registered on 29.1.2009 on the file of Tiruvanthapuram Police Station, Kerala State and also based on a complaint lodged by the wife of the petitioner’s brother, another Cr.No.36 of 2009 was registered on 7.2.2009 on the file of Bahadurpura Police Station and the investigation of these crimes is in progress. In view of the stand taken in the counter affidavit that three crimes were already registered against respondent Nos.3 and 4 and the investigation in those cases is in progress, no further orders need be passed in the writ petition, and the same is accordingly closed. However, respondent Nos.1 and 2 are directed to expedite the investigation of the crimes. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 6th March, 2009 bcj