THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI Writ Petition Nos.11513, 11534, 11553, 11626, 11639, 11706, 11708 and 11714 of 2011 Date : 25-04-2011 W.P.No.11513 of 2011 Between : Smt.Bhupathiraju Naga Venkata Padmavathi .. Petitioner and The Special Cadre Deputy Registrar/ Officer on Special Duty/ The District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, Eluru, West Godavari District & 2 Others .. Respondents W.P.No.11534 of 2011 Between : Smt.Bhupathiraju Naga Venkata Padmavathi .. Petitioner and The Special Cadre Deputy Registrar/ Officer on Special Duty/ The District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, Eluru, West Godavari District & 2 Others .. Respondents W.P.No.11553 of 2011 Between : Smt.Penmetsa Suryakanthamma & another .. Petitioners and The Special Cadre Deputy Registrar/ Officer on Special Duty/ The District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, Eluru, West Godavari District & 2 Others .. Respondents W.P.No.11626 of 2011 Between : Smt.Penmetsa Suryakanthamma .. Petitioner and The Special Cadre Deputy Registrar/ Officer on Special Duty/ The District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, Eluru, West Godavari District & 2 Others .. Respondents W.P.No.11639 of 2011 Between : Smt.Penmetsa Suryakanthamma & another .. Petitioners and The Special Cadre Deputy Registrar/ Officer on Special Duty/ The District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, Eluru, West Godavari District & 2 Others .. Respondents W.P.No.11706 of 2011 Between : Smt.Penmetsa Suryakanthamma .. Petitioner and The Special Cadre Deputy Registrar/ Officer on Special Duty/ The District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, Eluru, West Godavari District & 2 Others .. Respondents W.P.No.11708 of 2011 Between : Smt.Bhupathiraju Ramalinga Raju .. Petitioner and The Special Cadre Deputy Registrar/ Officer on Special Duty/ The District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, Eluru, West Godavari District & 2 Others .. Respondents W.P.No.11714 of 2011 Between : Smt.Bhupathiraju Ramalinga Raju .. Petitioner and The Special Cadre Deputy Registrar/ Officer on Special Duty/ The District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, Eluru, West Godavari District & 2 Others .. Respondents The Court made the following Common Order : COMMON ORDER : These Writ Petitions are connected, involving common questions of fact and law, therefore being disposed of with the consent of both the counsel by this common order. Heard Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarty, learned counsel for the petitioners and Smt.Bobba Vijaya Lakshmi, learned counsel for Respondents 1 to 3. These Writ Petitions have been filed to declare the certificate dated 19-11-2010 issued under Section 71 of the A.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 by respondents 1 and 2 herein viz., the Special Cadre Deputy Registrar/Officer on Special Duty, the District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, Eluru, West Goadavari District and the Senior Inspector/Arbitrator/Sale Officer, the District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, Eluru, West Goadavari District, as illegal. The 3rd respondent-society filed an application under Section 71 of the Act against the petitioners for recovery of some amounts allegedly due from them to the society. The petitioners appeared through counsel and submitted their defence by filing written statements. The 1st respondent thereafter passed the impugned orders. The petitioners challenged the said orders by filing C.R.P.Nos.444, 315, 106, 314, 112, 312, 310 and 313 of 2011 respectively. This Court considered various contentions of the petitioners including the contention that the impugned order was passed without giving an opportunity to the petitioner to cross- examine the witnesses of the society and disposed of the Civil Revision Petitions holding that there is no violation of principles of natural justice, nor the impugned orders suffer from any jurisdictional error, therefore the Civil Revision Petitions are not maintainable under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. While observing that the petitioners are not precluded from availing the alternative remedy of appeal under Section 76 of the Act this court directed to maintain status quo obtaining as on that day in all respects for a period of four weeks from the date of the order. Notwithstanding challenge made to the impugned order in the revision petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and the disposal of the same by this Court in the manner as stated above, the petitioners have filed these writ petitions against the very same orders under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. In my view these writ petitions are not maintainable because this Court has already considered the contentions of the petitioners as regards the violation of principles of natural justice and recorded a finding thereon. The petitioners are therefore precluded from agitating the same issues by filing these Writ Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution. In view of the above, these writ petitions are not maintainable and are accordingly dismissed. No costs. ________________ NOUSHAD ALI, J. 25th April, 2011 skmr