Civil Revision No. 890 of 2010 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No. 890 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:- 21.10.2011 Bhagwant Singh ....Petitioner Vs. Sher Singh and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL ****** Present:- Mr. Vikas Lochab, Advocate, for the petitioner. None for the respondents. A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) This petition assails the order dated 21.01.2010 (Annexure P-3) passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Assand, allowing the application filed by the defendant No.2-respondent No.2 (hereinafter referred as 'the respondent No.2') under Order 7 rule 11 CPC and directing the plaintiff- petitioner (hereinafter referred as 'the petitioner') to file ad-valorem court fee. The petitioner has challenged the sale deed dated 12.03.2009 on the allegation that respondent No.1, the alleged General Power of Attorney, was not authorized to sell the property standing in his name. As such, he was not liable to make payment of the Court fee. Thus, it appears that the sale deed has been challenged by the petitioner being the result of fraud and Civil Revision No. 890 of 2010 (O&M) 2 without authority. In these circumstances, this petition is accepted; the impugned order is set aside, subject to the condition that if the trial Court finally reaches the conclusion that respondent No.1 had the authority to execute the sale deed and the sale deed was valid, then the petitioner could be directed to make payment of the Court fee before passing the judgment. (A.N.JINDAL) October 21, 2011 JUDGE ajp