IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1223 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 1223 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 1223 OF 2006 Bansnarayan Sitaprasad Patel. ] .. Petitioner Versus 1. The Slum Rehabilitation Authority ] & 5 ors. ] .. Respondents Mr. V.R. Tripathi for the petitioner. Mr. G.D. Uttangale for respondent No.1. Mrs. S. Ajit Kumar for respondent No.2. Mr. R.Y. Gaonkar i/b B.R. Patil for respondent No.5. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 03RD MAY, 2006 P.C. : . It is a case of the petitioner that his name was originally included in Annexure II, but without giving him notice, his name has been excluded and the name of his brother-in-law has been included. It is submitted that he has made a representation to the BMC and the same has not been considered. He has also preferred an Appeal before the SRA which also has not been considered. We direct the respondents No.1 and 2 to consider the representation/Appeal pending before : 2 : them, filed by the petitioner herein, and to dispose of the same according to law at any rate not later than eight weeks from today. If the claim of the petitioner is upheld, he will be entitled to transit accommodation. 2. With the above directions, Writ Petition stands disposed of. Sd/- [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] Sd/- [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]