-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1942 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 1942 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 1942 OF 2005 IN IN IN SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO. 47 OF 1990 APPEAL NO. 47 OF 1990 APPEAL NO. 47 OF 1990 Sudhir Rangnath Wani & Ors..... Appellants. Versus Bapurao N. Wani (since deceased) through his L.Rs. Kalyan Bapurao Wani and Ors..... Respondents. Mr. K. Y. Mandlik for the Appellants. None for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 25TH NOVEMBER, 2005. : 25TH NOVEMBER, 2005. : 25TH NOVEMBER, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: Heard learned Counsel for the appellants. 2. Considering the averments made in the application for restoration and revocation of orders dated 4-3-2002/29-4-2002, I am inclined to grant prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c). Averments are sufficient to demonstrate that there was no office objection at the -: 2 :- relevant time, but in view of the general order passed, the appellants suffered dismissal order of the present second appeal. In this background, the civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c). Civil application is, accordingly, stands disposed of. 3. Interim relief also stands restored. Sd/- (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. V. V. MOHTA,J.) MOHTA,J.) MOHTA,J.)