' Writ Petition (s; No. g'ssofzoos‘ 1) Petitioners Smt Madnuiata Tamrakar aged 52 years, W/ Shn Janaklai Tamrakar ovt Hr Sec Schoo! Takhatpur AsSIstant Teaéher Dsstnct Bllaspur (CG) ishwar Lal Sahu aged 47 years S/o Shn Pam: Lal Sahu Govt Middle S hool Joob Assxstant Teacher Dxstnct Rajnandg on (CG Versus Respondents a, The State Gavemment of Chhattlsgarh through the Secretary, Education & Tuba! Department D K S Bhawan Ralpur(CG) The District Education Officer Rajndo CG) Bilaspu r 2) 3 Th strct ucation Offce CG) Block Nagan (CG) Writ Petition under Articte 226 of the Constitution of indie) SB Hon’ble Mr Satish K Agnihotri, < x r i v I t i Present: i i i i i i i t. i i t hri SomkantVetma counsetforthe petitioners Shri U N S Deo Gov‘ Advocate forthe State ORAL ORDER- ‘(Passed on 14'" February, 2008) earned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well a8 f the § Stateirespondents jointly submit that the fact and question of law involved in the g present writ petition are the same to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwa; Vs 'Mumcipal Corporation, Burg and another {2006 (H) MPJR -cG 96} which has been disposed of Vide order dated 3 4 2006 Learned counsei appearing for the respondents does not controveit the said submissro ' 2) Accordingly, the writ petition is altowed in terms or the order passed in the t case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwai Vs Municipal corporation, Durg and ‘ another (supra), subject to verit'cation of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquzred B Ed Examination Certificate on their own expenses as per the Circutars dated 24 12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further whether they have en i two t iadvance Increments or not No order as to costs Sd/— Satish’ K.'Agniotr *J‘u'dge I t t i i > i I i t r i 1 ‘E 1 1, ' " o ) angan ( ) e Dii Ed r re ( S « i L or , ‘ n be pad I V . h1f t i =