IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.17202 of 2011 Date of Decision : September 14, 2011. Anshu Singla .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Randhir Singh Manhas, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks a mandamus for her appointment as Hindi Mistress in the Education Department, Punjab being higher in merit. The petitioner was not given appointment as she did not attend the second counseling. The petitioner alleges that she did not come to know about the second counseling as it was displayed on the Internet only. The petitioner is stated to have attended the third counseling but the official respondents refused to consider her claim for appointment. The petitioner has tried to explain the circumstances for her non-appearance in the second counseling. The petitioner has, however, approached this Court without even representing the Authorities. CWP No.17202 of 2011 [2] Since the petitioner has not appeared in the second counseling, the respondents may consider her explanation sympathetically and if found worth acceptance, her claim for appointment as per merit may be considered. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with the direction to the respondents to treat this writ petition as a representation on behalf of the petitioner and dispose of her claim by passing a speaking order, within a period of two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. September 14, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE