IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14342 of 2009 SUGANDHI DEVI …PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SHANKAR RAM …OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 02. 25.11.2010 Heard. Petitioner is the informant of the case instituted under sections 420,406,347 AND 504/34 IPC. O.P.No.2 (accused) was serving as a Branch Manager of a Scheduled Bank. Allegation was levelled that he received certain gratifications, but did not issue Kisan Credit Card in favour of the informant. By order impugned granting anticipatory bail, learned Sessions Judge has noticed the salient features of the case and thereafter admitted him(o.p.no.2) on anticipatory bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner (informant) submits that o.p.no.2 is also involved in some other case which was not taken note of by learned court below. I am afraid on this ground the impugned order can be interfered with. This court finds not merit in this application which is accordingly dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )