IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1739 of 2011 Sudhir Kumar, son of Ram Bhagan Prasad resident of Chitkohra, P.O. Anisabad, District- Patna……… Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The District Superintendent of Education, Nalanda 3. The Block Education Extension Officer, Chandi, Nalanda. ……………….. Respondents. ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Chakrapani, Advocate Mr. Dipak Kumar, Advocate Mr. Madhuresh Singh, Advocate For the State: Mr. P.K. Verma, AAG-V Mr. Jahan Ara, A.C. to AAG-V ------------- 2. 9.8.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. In view of the statement made in paragraph No.5 of the counter affidavit that the suspension of the petitioner has been revoked by office order dated 22.1.2011, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. Thus, the writ petition has become infructuous. However, it is pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has not been paid any subsistence allowance for the period of his suspension. The writ application is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous, but with a direction to the respondent authorities to pay the subsistence allowance to the petitioner within a period 2 of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J. )