IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.1757 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : February 03, 2010. Ram Dass .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.R.S.Manhas, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved at the selection and consequential appointment of respondent No.5 as Clerk against the post reserved for physically challenged persons, namely, the candidates belonging to special categories. It appears from the material on record that out of three categories of the Physically Challenged persons, the said posts of clerks were earmarked for the visually impaired candidates only. The petitioner, however, is a Orthopeadically Challenged person. His grievance is that the entire process of selection has been kept secret and short-listing of the candidates etc. has not been disclosed to him despite the representations C.W.P.No .1757 of 2010 (O&M) 2 dated 19.9.2008 (Annexure P-7) and 30.1.2009 (Annexure P-9). Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner at some length and keeping in view the nature of relief sought by him in the writ petition against the selection process followed by the respondents, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the claim of the petitioner, as contained in his representation dated 30.1.2009 (Annexure P-9), and redress his grievance by passing s speaking order, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Disposed of. Dasti. 03-02-2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE