IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6494 of 2011 SATYENDRA KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 20.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Mainatand P.S. Case No. 58 of 2010 registered under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420 and 473 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran. From the studio of the petitioner, the forged residential certificates, income certificates, caste certificates, election I.D. cards and other documents were recovered. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the studio was being run by the brother of the petitioner and neither the seized documents were verified nor the hard disc of the computer was verified, whether it was prepared in the studio or not, that can be a good ground for grant of regular bail to the petitioner. 2 Let the learned court below consider the regular bail of the petitioner if the petitioner surrenders within a period of four weeks. With the above observation, this application is, accordingly, disposed off. Let the order be transmitted to the learned court below through fax at the cost of the petitioner. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)