1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION (LODGING) NO. 1196 OF 2009 Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. ...Petitioner. Vs. Irshad Hussain Khatib ...Respondent. Mr. Prasad Das i/by M/s. Goenka Law Associates for the Petitioner. Mr. Y.M. Naik i/by Mr. Y.Y. Naik for the Respondent. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 11th December, 2009. P.C.- 1 The parties have, in Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act-1996, (for short, the Arbitration Act) Petition, settled the matter and also re-scheduled the installments. The letter dated 10th December, 2009 signed by the Petitioner, addressed to the Respondent is placed on record and marked as Exhibit "X". 2 In view of this, the present petition is disposed of, as the matter is settled out of the Court, with liberty. The interim order already granted in terms of prayer clause (d), for item No.1, shall continue till the amount is paid as prayed. 3 The petition is dismissed as settled. No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)