(1) CRI. APP. 2132.2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2132 OF 2011 1. Hamida Banesaheb @ Banekha Shaikh 2. Kayyum Sherali Sheikh 3. Shabna Kayyum Sheikh .. Applicants VERSUS The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent ... Mr. P.B. Kakade, Advocate for the Applicants Mr. S.K. Tambe, APP for the respondent-State ... CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, V.J. DATED : 18TH MAY, 2011 ORAL ORDER:- 1. Heard. 2. The FIR filed by the complainant reveals that all the present three applicants had insulted the complainant, who is of 'Mang' community by abusing over her caste 'Mang'. It is not a case where the FIR does not disclose the commission of the offence under section 3 r/w. section 7 of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. (2) CRI. APP. 2132.2011 3. Learned counsel for the applicants, however, states that the caste of the accused is not mentioned in the FIR and, therefore, the applicants can be released on bail. However, the very names of the accused exhibit their community as 'Mohammadan' community. Therefore, merely for some technicality, the Application cannot be allowed. 4. In the circumstances, no case is made out for grant of anticipatory bail. Hence, the Criminal Application is dismissed. Sd/- [M.T. JOSHI] VACATION JUDGE arp