IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 24TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 12733 of 2007(N) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- NARAYANAN, S/O.VASU, AGED 80, BLOCK NO.552, CHAKKAMALA, CHITHARA, KOTTARAKKARA. BY ADV. SRI.J.OM PRAKASH RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT SURVEY SUPERINTENDANT, COLLECTORATE, KOLLAM. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, KOTTARAKKARA. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, CHITHARA VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA. 4. NISHA UMESH, USHA BHAVAN, BLOCK NO.91, CALLIMUKKU, EX.COLONY P.O., KOTTARAKKARA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. M.R. SABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.12733/2007 N APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 18/12/99. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DTD. 19/01/2000. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DTD. 17/07/2006. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT DTD. 5/10/2006. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE SURVEY SKETCH IN SURVEY NO.379 OF THE CHITHRA VILLAGE DTD. NIL. EXT.P6: COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT SURVEY SUPERINTENDANT DTD. 6/12/2006. EXT.P7: COPY OF THE LETTER OF THE SURVEYOR DTD. NIL. /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) 12733 of 2007 ------------------------------------- Dated: February 13, 2008 JUDGMENT In this writ petition the prayer of the petitioner is for correction in the mutation that is already effected. Ext.P3 is a representation the petitioner made to the Chief Minister and it is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that the representation has been forwarded to the 2nd respondent. It is also stated by the petitioner that following the receipt of Ext.P3, the 2nd respondent got a report from the 3rd respondent and that is Ext.P4. It is also submitted that pursuant to Ext.P6, the property has been measured. 2. Taking into account the complaint of the petitioner and also the fact that Ext.P4 report has been obtained and the property itself has been measured, I direct that the 2nd respondent shall consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 as expeditiously as possible, at WP(C) 12733/07 Page numbers any rate, within four weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-