n ^ r^.s^^ co IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF C.G. AT BILASPUR W. P. (Cl No. of 2009 PETITIONERS ^/ \/~y / •* ./ ,^^/ y ^ ..-•' ^y/ .<^7 ^ RESPONDENTS 4 •^' 1. Renuka Yadav, D/o Kirti Yadav, aged about 17 years, Through her Legal Guardian and Father Kirti Yadav R/o Irrigation Colony, Kududand, Bilaspur, District-Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. Vijay Rajak, aged about 19 years, S/o Sahdev, R/o Mata Choura, Bilaspur, District-Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. Rajkumar Rathore, aged about 19 years, S/o Raghunandan,R/o Mata Choura Mangla, Bilaspur, District-Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Rajendra Singh, aged about 22 years, S/o Ram Singh, R/o Yadav Mohalla, Tikrapara, Bilaspur, District-Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. Late Devidayal Sahu Education Society, Navgawan, Block- Baloda, District-Janjgir-Cham.pa (C.G.) Registered under the Chhattisgarh Societies Registration Act 1973 (Registration No. 3807) through the authorized signatoiy, Registered Office at Navgawan, Block-Baloda, District-Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) VERSUS :!.' State of Chhattisgarh : Through Secretary School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chhattisgarh Board of Secondary Education, though the Secretary, Pensionbada, Raipiir (C.G.) \\ w 3. Board of Higher Secondary Education, Delhi, through the Secretary Registered Office at Rajputana Lal Bhawan, Bhawan No. 17, Gopalpurgaon (Tunarpur) Post Office Azadpur, Delhi-9 4. Guru Ghasidas Central University, through the Registrar Koni, District-Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. Pt. Sundar Lal Sharma University, though the Registrar, Vyapar Vihar, Bilaspur (C.G.) 6. Unemployment Office, Bilaspur (C.G.) through the Office- Incharge, Ware House Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) 7. Industrial Traming Institute, Bilaspur, through the Principal, Koni, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA NTS HIGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH : BiLASPUR WR1T PETiTION (C) NO._48TOQF2009 (Writ PetitiQn under Stngie Bench : Stateof Chhattisgarh & Othere Aiticie 226 of the Constitution of India) Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Pratsek Sharma, Advocate forthe petitioners. Shri V.V.S. Moorthy, Dy. Advocate Generai for the Shri Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate for the respondent No.2. Shri Ashish Shrivasfava, wiih Shri Harsh Wardhan, Advocates for the resppndenf sMo.4. Advocate for the ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 04th day of August, 2011) Shri Agrawal, iearned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2/ Soard submits that fhe petitioner, by fiiing this petition on 28.08.2009, has sought a direction against the respondent Board to grant admission to the students of school of petitioner No.5 society by deciding there eiigibiiity in accordance with law and further to give admission to the students of schooi of petitioner No.5 society, In respective cfasses for further studies, by extending the period of admission. in accordancs with law. Shri Agrawai, further submits that the Board has no objection to consfder cases of the pstitioners No. 1 to 4 in the light of {heir request, as v/as made in the year 2009 and pass the order at the aariiest. !n view of foregoing, iearned counsei appearing for Uie petitioners submits fhat nothing remains tor adjudication, sinca the petitioners No.1 & 2 were admitted Dursuant to fhe order dated 07.10.2010 passed by this Court and they have completed their couree also. In vlew of that, if thsre is no other difficulty, the resuit of the petitioners No.1 & 2 shal! be deciared within a period ofseven days. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. 4. Certified copy today. ashsk Sd/- SatishK.Agmhotri Judge tS^