(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.314 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.314 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.314 OF 2004 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 453 OF 2003 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 453 OF 2003 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 453 OF 2003 The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant Versus Bhalchandra Trimbak Kharwandikar ...Respondent ..... Mr. Y.S. Shinde, A.P.P. for State-Applicant ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. DATED: 22ND JULY, 2005 DATED: 22ND JULY, 2005 DATED: 22ND JULY, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. The State has preferred Criminal Appeal No. 453 of 2003 against acquittal of the respondent. There was some delay in filing the said appeal, hence, Criminal Application No. 4863 of 2003 came to be preferred for condonation of delay. In the said application notices have already been issued. Now, it appears that inadvertently, the State has filed another application i.e. the present application for condonation of delay in the very same appeal. 2. Looking to the fact that the Criminal Application No.4863 of 2003 has already been filed, this application does not survive and the same is disposed of as infructuous *****