THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.11440 of 2009 Date:28.04.2011 Between: G.Harinath ..... Petitioner AND The Collector, Hyderabad and others .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri B.Gangadhar Goud Counsel for Respondent No.1: Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue Counsel for Respondent No.2: Sri R.Radha Krishna Reddy, standing counsel for GHMC Counsel for Respondent No.3: Sri C. Raghu Counsel for respondent No.2: Sri V.Subrahmanyam The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the respondent No.2 in allowing the 3rd respondent herein to proceed with the construction of the premises bearing H.No.18-3-507/1 situated outside Lal Darwaza, Hamam Bowli, Hyderabad, despite the specific orders passed by the 1st respondent on 8-5-2008 vide Endorsement No.N1/10975/2008 wherein it was directed to the 2nd respondent herein not to accord building permission in favour of the 3rd respondent or any other person in respect of premises No.18-3-507/1, Outside Lal Darwaza, Hamam Bowli, Hyderabad, as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the 2nd respondent herein to demolish the structures and to take legal action against the 3rd respondent herein in accordance with law, and to grant such other relief or reliefs..” At the hearing, Sri B.Gangadhar Goud, the learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. To that effect, he addressed letter dated 27.04.2011 to the Registry. The request of the learned counsel for the petitioner is accepted. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.14729 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 28th April, 2011 GHN