IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 648 of 2008 (M/S) Mohd. Salim S/o Khursheed Ali ……Petitioner Versus Jogendra Singh S/o Ishwar Singh …….Respondent Mr. J.C. Belwal, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. Siddharth Singh, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, counsel for respondent. Dated:-21-10-2010 Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By means of this petition, the petitioner has sought writ in the nature of certiorari for setting aside the impugned judgment and order dated 20.02.2008 (Annexure-11 to the writ petition), passed by District Judge, Udham Singh Nagar, whereby revision of respondent-Jogendra Singh (tenant) was allowed and the order dated 08.08.2007, passed by Judge, Small Cause Court in S.C.C. suit No. 19 of 2001, was set aside. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the parties have informed to the Court that the parties have settled their dispute outside the court and have also filed an affidavit to this effect before this Court on 19.10.2010. Since the parties have settled their dispute outside the court and possession had already been delivered to the petitioner and the entire arrears of rent and damages have also been paid, learned counsel for respondent has no objection if the petition is allowed. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly conceded to this fact that the amount of arrears has been paid to his client and the premises in question is in the possession of petitioner. In view of the above statement, made at bar by the counsel for the parties, the writ petition is allowed. The judgment and decree dated 20.02.2008 passed by District Judge, Udham Singh Nagar in S.C.C. revision No. 44 of 2007, 2 is set aside and the order dated 08.08.2007, passed by Judge, Small Cause Court in S.C.C. suit No. 19 of 2001, Mohd. Salim Vs. Jogendra Singh, is affirmed. (B.S.Verma, J.) 21-10-2010 S