IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R No.4624 of 2011 Date of Decision:- 2.8.2011 M/s Devinder Nath Bhim Sain ....Petitioner vs. Suresh ....Respondent *** CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR *** Present:- Mr. Rajnish Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. The present petitioner is the plaintiff in the suit for recovery of Rs.2,69,000/- titled M/s Devinder Nath Bhim Sain v. Suresh. He is aggrieved with order dated 3.6.2011 passed by the Civil Judge(Sr.Division), Kaithal, by dint of which their evidence has been closed by order of the Court. Hence, this revision. Heard. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the plaintiff-petitioner is not to lead any further evidence but just wants to tender two documents for which one opportunity be granted otherwise they will suffer an irreparable loss; however, for their lapse, the plaintiff is ready to compensate the opposite party. Only documents are to be tendered by the plaintiff. Plaintiff deserves one opportunity for the said purpose. Rules and procedure are hand-maid of justice and are meant to enhance it and not to scuttle the same. Accordingly, the present revision is allowed, impugned order is set aside and the trial Court is directed to afford one effective opportunity to lead evidence as stated above; however, subject to payment of costs of Rs.10,000/- to be paid by the plaintiff to the opposite side before the trial Court. Keeping in view the circumstances mentioned above, this revision is being disposed of without issuing any notice to the opposite C.R No.4624 of 2011 -2- party. If the respondent is summoned to contest this litigation, he will have to incur huge expenses to defend this case. However, liberty is granted to the respondent that if he feels dissatisfied with this order, he may move an application to recall the same. August 02, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR) JS JUDGE