wp1413.10 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1413 OF 2010 Sau Alka Namdeo Kadu ...Petitioner Versus Babasaheb Mohan Yevale and others ...Respondents ..... Shri Namdeo R. Kadu, attorney of petitioner Sau. Alka Kadu Shri V.V. Tarde. Advocate for R. Nos. 1 to 3. ..... CORAM: B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED: 21st FEBRUARY, 2011 PER COURT:- 1 The petitioner has refused to engage any other advocate. Her attorney (husband) appearing today is again not in a position to assist the court. He is not comprehending the scope of this petition. 2 Advocate Shri. V.V. Tarde, appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 has stated that civil suit is still pending. The trial court has rejected the prayer of the petitioner for temporary injunction and that has been maintained by the appellate court. 3 In this situation, without going into the merits of the matter, the wp1413.10 -2- proceeding in R.C.S. No. 149 of 2009 are expedited. The Court of learned C.J.J.D. is directed to decide the same as early as possible and within a period of one year from the date of communication of this order to it. 4 Liberty to the trail court to direct the petitioner-plaintiff to engage advocate, if it found that it is not receiving proper assistance. 5 Writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ( B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) rlj/