IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14736 of 2006 SUNIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Versus BIHAR STATE CONSUMERS CO-OPERATIVE FEDERATION LTD. & ORS. ----------- 4 4.9.2008 Heard learned counsel for the parties. On the face of it the facts of the case look rather unfair to the petitioner that petitioner was suspended way back in the year 1986 and he continues to be in that position of suspended animation all these years. But the petitioner seems to have reconciled to the position for one or the other reasons as did not to come before this Court earlier. The order of suspension has been challenged after more than twenty years. Many a things have happened in twenty years including the fact that the so called organization of which the petitioner was in service which is an apex Co- operative body has virtually lost its existence and has become defunct. In the given facts and circumstances the Court is not in a position or inclined to interfere with the matter one way or the 2 other while exercising power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Since the petitioner has remedy under the Bihar Co-operative Societies Act, he may invoke the same. The present writ application is dismissed with the above liberty. RPS/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)