MC 1713/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Mr. Sk. N. Mohammad, the learned counsel for the applicants and Mr . N. Rajkhowa, learned standing counsel, Education, for the official respondents . Considering the prayer for induction of the Inspector of Schools, Kamrup as Respondent No.4, in place of the Deputy Inspector of Schools, Kamrup, who wa s erroneously arrayed, the induction of the concerned officer is permitted. Accordingly, the misc. case stands allowed and the Inspector of Schools, Kamrup, is permitted to be shown as Respondent No.4, in place of the Deputy Ins pector of Schools, Kamrup, in WP'No.2722/11. Office to make necessary correction accordingly, in the cause-title of the writ petition.