IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH AUGUST 2011 / 26TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 22244 of 2011(E) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- SURENDRA N.NAIR, S/O.NARAYANAN NAIR, A/303, EC 61, MANGAL SADAN, EVERSHINE CITY, VASAI EAST, THANE-401 208. BY ADVS. SRI.PHILIP T.VARGHESE SRI.THOMAS T.VARGHESE SMT.ACHU SUBHA ABRAHAM SMT.DIVYA KRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER, PUBLIC OFFICES BUILDING, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR-680 001. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, KODUNGALLOOR-680 664. R1 TO R3 BY SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.J.RAJASHREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/08/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.22244/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.2058/2008 OF SRO, MALA DATED 27/5/2008. P2 COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, THRISSUR DATED 17/5/2011. P3 COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 2/6/2011. P4 COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF REVISION PETITION DATED 8/8/2011 WITHOUT ANNEXURES. P5 COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 8/8/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO.JUDGE sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 22244 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 17th day of August, 2011 J U D G M E N T Ext.P3 is an order passed by the 2nd respondent in the purported exercise of powers under Act 28 of 2008. Aggrieved by the said order, petitioner has filed Ext.P4 revision, which is pending before the 1st respondent. In this writ petition, what is sought for is an expeditious decision on Ext.P4. 2. Having regard to the case of the petitioner regarding the pendency of Ext.P4 revision, which is statutory in nature, I direct the 1st respondent to consider the same and pass orders thereon. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible at any rate within 3 months of production of a copy of this judgment. It is directed that until a decision on Ext.P4 is taken, further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P3 will be kept in abeyance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp