IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 4860 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 4860 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 4860 OF 2006 Nagraj Pukharajaji Sheth ] .. Petitioner Versus 1. Uran Municipal Council & 6 ors. ] .. Respondents Mr. P.K. Dhakephalkar i/b Mr. Sudhir Prabhu for the petitioner. Mr. C.J. Sawant i/b Mr. V.C. Ghosalkar for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. P.M. Patil, AGP, for respondents No.3 to 5 and 7. Mr. Sachin Shetye for respondent No.6. CORAM: R.M. LODHA & NARESH H. PATIL, JJ. DATED: 09TH AUGUST, 2006 P.C. : . We heard Mr. P.K. Dhakephalkar, the senior counsel for the petitioner and perused the averments made in the Writ Petition and the documents annexed thereto. 2. There is no element of public interest involved in the Writ Petition nor does it espouse the cause of public at large. : 2 : 3. We are, thus, satisfied that this public interest litigation does not deserve to be entertained. Dismissed accordingly. Needless to say any party privately aggrieved by the action of the State Government or the Municipal Council, Uran is free to prosecute his remedy available under law. Sd/- [R.M. [R.M. [R.M. LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] Sd/- [NARESH [NARESH [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] H. PATIL, J.] H. PATIL, J.]