IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1488 of 2009 SATYA NARAYAN MISHRA, SON OF BHASKAR PRASAD MISHRA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-ISLAMPUR MOTIJHEEL, POLICE STATION-TOWN, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR. …………………………………DEFENDANT-PETITIONER. Versus 1. SUDHANSU ANAND. 2. HIMANSHU ANAND. BOTH SON OF SRI RAM NATH GUPTA, RESIDENT OF ANANDAM, D.P. GUPTA LANE, MOTIJHEEL, TOWN- MUZAFFARPUR, P.S. TOWN, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR. …………………………PLAINTIFF-OPPOSITE PARTIES. ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. K. N. Diwakar, Advocate. -------- 2. 3.2.2010. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Civil Revision to avail any other remedy, if available to him under law, in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Shiv Shakti Coop. Housing Society, Nagpur Vs. Swaraj Developers and others, reported in (2003)6 Supreme Court Cases 659 and Surya Dev Rai Vs. Ram Chander Rai and others reported in (2003)6 Supreme Court Cases 675. In that view of the matter, this Civil Revision is - 2 - dismissed as withdrawn. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)