IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.356 of 2007 Sheo Prasad Singh son of Late Bhagwan Prasad Singh, resident of village Bajidpur, P.S. Bihta, District Patna. ….Plaintiff-Petitioner Versus Smt. Jageshwari Devi wife of Sri Ram Nath Prasad, resident of village Sri Rampur, P.S. Bihta, District Patna. …Defendant-Opposite party. For the petitioner : Mr. Nand Kishore Pd. Sinha, Advocate. For the opposite party: None. ----------- 03/ 05.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. By the impugned order dated 30.11.2006 the learned Munsif, Danapur rejected two applications filed by the plaintiff-petitioner in Title Suit No.42 of 1998. Since one civil revision can be filed only against that part of the impugned order by which one of the applications was disposed of, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he limits this civil revision only against that part of the impugned order dated 30.11.2006 by which his application dated 13.10.2006 for admitting some documents as exhibits has been rejected by the learned court below. He further submits that he reserves his right to file a separate civil revision against other part of the impugned order. The said prayer made on behalf of the petitioner is allowed, subject to the specific provisions of law. 3. This civil revision has been filed by the sole plaintiff-petitioner which is now against only that part of the impugned order dated 30.11.2006 by which the learned Munsif, 2 Danapur rejected his application dated 13.10.2006 filed for admitting certain documents as exhibits in Title Suit No.42 of 1998. 4. The aforesaid suit was filed by the plaintiff- petitioner for demarcation of his land bearing plot no.1657 mentioned in Schedule-II of the plaint, ridge of which had been broken in between the said land of the plaintiff-petitioner and the land of defendant-opposite party bearing plot no.1656 mentioned in Schedule-III of the plaint after due measurement and fixing pillar after appointment of Pleader Commissioner and for other ancillary reliefs. 5. It transpires that the sole defendant-opposite party appeared in the suit and filed his written statement, whereafter issues were framed and the plaintiff was directed on 09.09.2005 to start adducing his evidence but he started his evidence on 19.12.2005 after three months, which was concluded on 28.12.2005, whereafter evidence of the defendant also started and was concluded on 10.03.2006. It further transpires that the arguments could not be started as the plaintiff had filed a petition on 27.04.2006 which was disposed of by the learned court below on 31.05.2006 holding that if the plaintiff wanted he may get the disputed signatures examined by an expert but neither the plaintiff challenged the said order nor got the disputed signatures examined and hence arguments of the defendant started. 6. While the arguments were going on, plaintiff- petitioner filed two applications, both dated 13.10.2006, one for 3 admitting certain documents as exhibits and the other for withdrawal of some paper, which were photocopies of the originals. Both the aforesaid applications were rejected by the learned court below vide its impugned order dated 30.11.2006. This civil revision is limited only to that part of the aforesaid order by which the application of the plaintiff-petitioner for admitting certain documents as exhibits was rejected by the learned court below. 7. The learned court below had very carefully gone into the details of the matter and after considering the averments made in the plaint filed by the plaintiff-petitioner and the contents of the documents sought to be exhibited, rightly came to the conclusion that the said documents had no concern with the issues framed, nor they were connected with the pleadings of the plaintiff and were filed only to linger the suit, as was also apparent from the conduct of the plaintiff throughout the proceeding of the suit. 8. This court does not find any illegality or jurisdictional error in the impugned order of the learned court below. Accordingly, this civil revision is dismissed. harish/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )