CWP No.12315 of 2011 (O&M) Manohar Lal V/s State of Haryana and others Present: Mr.Namit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner sought information with respect to a Parwana (Annexure P-1) issued from the Police Station Madlauda, District Panipat. The concerned officer filed a reply that no such Parwana has been issued. It is prayed that as the reply is factually incorrect, the matter should be remitted to the appellate authority to decide it afresh. I have heard counsel for the petitioner, perused the impugned order and express my inability to issue a writ, as prayed. As the officer concerned has disowned the alleged Parwana (Annexure P-1), nothing survives in the application filed by the petitioner for supply of information. The appellate authority has, therefore, not committed any error that would require interference. Dismissed. 29.07.2011 [ RAJIVE BHALLA ] shamsher JUDGE