Civil Revision No.1638 of 2009 [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Civil Revision No.1638 of 2009 Decided on : March 24, 2009 Darshana and others ... Petitioners VERSUS Gurmukh Singh and others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Vikas Bahl, Advocate for the petitioners. A.N.JINDAL, J.- The petitioners – plaintiffs have pleaded natural succession for seeking inheritance of Nathu Ram and had filed the suit for declaration and consequential relief of injunction and possession. However, the respondents – defendants, besides taking other pleas also pleaded the Will dated 3.6.1964 in favour of Padma Devi, Sheela Devi and Maina Devi, daughters-in-law. Counsel for the petitioners contends that in fact, no will was executed in favour of these ladies. The Will dated 3.6.1964 does not confer any absolute right upon these ladies, as such, the petitioners – plaintiffs wanted to raise this plea. After hearing the counsel for the petitioners at length, this Court is of the view that the petitioners – plaintiffs could challenge the Civil Revision No.1638 of 2009 [ 2 ] genuineness and validity of the Will before the Trial Court, without getting the plaint amended, in that regard. With the observation that the petitioners – plaintiffs shall be at liberty to raise all the aforesaid pleas at the time of arguments and the court would decide the same, this petition is disposed of accordingly. March 24, 2009 ( A.N.JINDAL ) `gian' JUDGE