Misceilanesu! lON-APPLiaWTS -r^ (^Y c IN THE HIGH COUffT OF JUDICffTuKE AT BILA5PURJC.G.) s No. ^° ^ f^;'un BgRgii ^) Kripa Ram Ttiakur S/o Budh Ram Tiiakur, ay6dAtout46yearB 2) Si«t. Bai w/o Ram 1s y Nagar,Raipur Tah & C»istt- Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS Ballu @ Rajkumar S/o Qiobha Ram Eihruw R/o Shwail Chbwk, Santoshi Nagar Raspur PS Tikrapara, Ralpur.Tah & Dsstt - Raipur (C.G.) Shrt Vaishno Interpris^ R,/o Banjari Road, Raipur,Tah & Dlstt- Raipiit (C.G.) Aooeaf unda-/section 17.3 OfThe MotorVehide Acfl' ~5^ -^WW^, •®Tl\W\S,h^wy. ....p,.A....4.&^.-......--^200!r sn^r •q5w (•ijcifgii^q) 3n^i w l<;-ii+ WI sn^T aT*iicb 'FaiiWfftei sii^i ^pifeRt'T Trroff tf fe^t 'tfsi^R ^•siRman^ S,B. Hon'bte Shri Justtee N.K. Adaraal r »> >!f 03.09.2010 Shri AL Singroul, Advocate T<(r the appellants. This Is 15 day's time barr^d appeal. The order under challenge in this appeal Is passed l|>y the Tribural under ©rder17 Rule 2 of CPC, therefore, leam^d counsel appearing for the appellants seeks permission of thi^ court te withcfraw this appeal with liberty to avail attemative renjiedy that may be avallable to him under the provisions of law. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly the appeal is ijlianissed as wlthdrawn. No order asto c<rets. | Sd/- N.K-AgrawaJ Judge Sahu |tii,