IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17886 of 2011 PAWAN PRASAD KESHRI, S/o Late Mahabir Saw, R/o – Beur Jail Chouraha, P.S. – Beur, District – Patna. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 15.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Smt. Indu Bala Pandey, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor and Sri Sunil Kumar Yadav, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant. The petitioner, who is in custody in Complaint Case No. 1070 of 2009 for the offence under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code has prayed for grant of bail. Initially the complainant, who is widow of one Ganesh Prasad Keshri, had filed a complaint for offences under Sections 467, 468, 379, 498A & 34 of the Indian Penal Code against her in-laws. In the case after conducting enquiry learned Magistrate took cognizance of offence under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has got no connection with the affairs of the present case being husband of sister of the complainant’s husband (nandoshi). Learned counsel for the complainant has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and it was submitted that by hatching conspiracy the accused 2 persons ousted her from matrimonial house. Be that as it may, the petitioner who is in custody for offence under Section 498A that too being husband of sister of the complainant’s husband (nandoshi), the court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for extending the privilege of bail. Let the petitioner namely, Pawan Prasad Keshri, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Gaya in connection with Complaint Case No. 1070 of 2009 Praful ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)