•t.Vfft. BENi*n QtWUt-i- (1) IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BiLASPUR (C.G) W. P. (S)NO. 7084 OF 2009 (S-B-) PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Shyam Dev Singh Yadav, S/o Shri Harinam Singh Yadav, aged about 66 years, Retired, Office Superintendent Office of IG Intelligence, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.), at present R/o H. No. 51, E-8, Extension, Chandrika Housing Society Bawadiakata, Bhopal(M.P.) ( VERSUS :1. The State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Home Department, D.K.S. 'Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director General of Police, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Inspector General of Police, Intelligence, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G,)- 4. The Assistant Inspector General of Police, Special Branch, P.H.Q., Raipur(C.G.) 5. The Aceountant General, Chhattisgarh Pagariya Complex, Pandri, Raipur(C.G.) 6. The Senior Account Officer, Office of Accountant ' General Ghhattisgarh, Pagariya Complex; Pandri, Raipur(C.G.) WRIT PEJ1TLQN UNDER ARTICLE226 OF THE CONSTITUIONOFINDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WRTT PETmON CS) No. 7084 of2009 Shyam Dev Singh Yadav. VERSUS RESPONDENTS The State ofClihattisgarh & Others. WRTT PETmON XJNDER ARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTmJTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Asnihotn, J. BaT- Present: Shri Subhash Yadav, Advocate tbr the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer forthe Statefespondents I to 4. Shri R. Pradhan, Advocate for fhe respondent No. 5 and 6. ORDERfORAL,) (Passed on 03" day of Itecember, 2009) Withthe consent ofleamed coimsel appearing for the parties, thematter is heard finallv. 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that tfae case, being payment of retiral benefrts matter, may be referred to the pensioa comnuttee. This Court, inthe matter ofW.P. No. 4642/2004 (BaynathMandal v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others) and otherconneeted mattera, directed the Committee to consider the matter ofretiral dues as the disputedquestion of facts were involved. The Coramittee was constituted bv the State Govemment, pursuant to fhe order dated 19.06.2006 passedinW.P. Na 196f/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Gewemment and athers) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.G.C. No. 105 of 2008 (5tofe< Chhattisgarh &0thers v. Baij'nath Mandal andanother).rQius,'6as petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31st of JaiiBary;"2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642/2004 Baijnath Mandal (supra) as subnutted by leamed counsel appearing for the parties. 3. With flie consent of the parties, this petition is aceordingly disposed of in the same terms i.e. the ofBce ofthe Advocate Oeneral is directed to send the case to fhe Connnittee, within a penod of 15 days ftomthe date of receipt of a copy of the petition from tfae petitioner and this order. Thereafter, the Coimnittee shall issue notice to tha petitioner and the officers coneemed, witfain a fiufher period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to '&e petitioner. Th& petitioner and th®officers concemedmayfile additional documents, ifnecessary. TIie entire exercise, inchidmg payinent 6f retiral dues, if any, t<»4he petitiones be completed within a period of four monfhs from the date of receipt of a <opy of this order. - 4. The petitkmer shallsujyly extra copy ofthepetitionto fhe leamed counsel appearmg^theresponderts^&rwardmgthesametoteGemnBttee. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Axmt