IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15171 of 2010 SAMI AHMAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 02.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 25 (1-B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that due to the political rivalry on the eve of Municipal Election some arms were planted and recovery has been shown evidence to that effect has been collected during investigation which gets reflected in the case diary. Moreover no recovery was made from the personal possession of the petitioner and he is a teacher of Government school having no criminal antecedent. I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. His prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. But keeping in view of the fact that the recovery has not been made from the personal possession nor he was arrested from the spot but the evidences suggest that due to political rivalry the arms 2 were planted in motor cycle which is a good ground for regular bail. Let the Court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner and may dispose of the same preferably on the same day. Let a copy of this order be communicated through FAX, to the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Saharsa P.S. Case No. 225 of 2008, at the cost of the petitioner. Anand Kr. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)