1 3556.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3556 OF 2010 Uday Dashrath Patil ...Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Abhijeet Desai i/b Mr.Jitendra P.Patil for Petitioner. Ms.M.H.Mhatre, A.P.P. for State/Respondents 1 & 2. Mr.M.S.Mohite for Respondents 3 to 7. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED:- JANUARY 12, 2011. P.C. 1. Preliminary objection regarding maintainability of this Petition is made. Our attention is invited to the fact that in earlier Writ Petition being Criminal Writ Petition No.1734 of 2008, specific relief was claimed by the Petitioner against the Respondents to transfer the investigation of C.R. No. 99/2008 registered with Akluj Police Station to Central Investigation Department (C.I.D.) or to Central Bureau of Investigation (C.B.I.). Identical relief is claimed in the present Petition, although in the earlier Writ Petition, the said relief was not granted to the petitioner. In that view of the matter, it 2 3556.10 is not open to the Petitioner to agitate the same relief by filing successive Petitions. 2. It is next contended that the Petitioner in the present Petition has asked for further relief of transfer of case registered with Akluj Police Station being C.R. No.100/2008 from District Solapur Malshiras Court to Satara Court, as the earlier case registered by Akluj Police Station being C.R.No.99/2008 against Respondents 2 to 7 has already been transferred to Court of Satara. This relief cannot be entertained in exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Petitioner, if so advised, may pursue such other remedy as may be available to him in that behalf. 3. Suffice it to observe that insofar as prayer clause (a) of the present Writ Petition is concerned, the same cannot be entertained for the reasons already recorded hitherto. 4. Petition disposed of on the above terms. (A.R.JOSHI, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)