R.S.A. No. 2324 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- R.S.A. No. 2324 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:- 15.11.2011 N.D.Rahi & Ors. ... Appellants Versus State of Punjab & Ors. ... Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present:- Mr. Hitesh Kaplish, Advocate, for the appellants. Gurdev Singh, J (oral) C. M. No. 6986 – C of 2010 Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing the appeal is hereby condoned. The application stands disposed of. C. M. No. 6987 – C of 2010 Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in re-filing the appeal is hereby condoned. The application stands disposed of. R.S.A No. 2324 of 2010 Appellants/plaintiffs have come up with this second appeal after their suit was decreed regarding the correction/rectification of the jamabandi, so as to incorporate them to the owners of the land to the extent of 7 marlas instead of 11 marlas in the land comprised of khasra Nos. 14(0- 11), 59 (10-13) and 1297 (0-18). R.S.A. No. 2324 of 2010 (O&M) -2- The grouse of the appellants is that the decree should have been passed for correction of the jamabandi in their names to the extent of 11 marlas. The suit of the plaintiffs itself was not maintainable before the Civil Court in view of Section 158 (2) (vi) of the Punjab Land Revenue Act 1887. The jurisdiction of Civil Court is specifically barred in the matter regarding correction of any entry is the record of right. The jamabandi forms part of record of right. However, the plaintiffs could have filed a suit, in case they were aggrieved by any entry of the record of right, for declaration of their right under Section 45 of the said Act. When such is the position, it cannot be said that any substantial question of law is involved in this appeal and the same is dismissed accordingly. November 15, 2010 (Gurdev Singh) tripti Judge