IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 11888 of 2009 Sudhir Jaglan ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents Present: Mr. Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG, Haryana for the State. RANJIT SINGH J. On 21.10.2009, this Court passed the following order:- “ The respondents have demanded an amount of Rs. 1,12,000/- from the petitioner on account of alleged subsidy spent on the study of the petitioner. No details have been given. In the communication dated 20.12.2008 (AnnexureP-3), the demand is made for Rs. 11,000/- as subsidy + Rs. 2050/- as penalty = total Rs. 13050/- per year. Rs. 11,000/- has already been deposited by the petitioner and rest of the amount i.e. Rs. 2050/- has been recovered from the account of the petitioner. Apparently, it appears that the subsidy spent on the study of the petitioner was Rs. 11,000/- per year. The petitioner has studied for a period of four years in the respondent- School and thus, the total subsidy which the petitioner may be found liable to pay comes to Rs. 44,000/-. What is the basis for imposing the penalty is also not known. Mr. Kundu shall seek fresh instructions and file fresh affidavit Civil Writ Petition No. 11888 of 2009 -2- giving details of calculations and the amount of annual subsidy which was spent on the study of the petitioner. Let the affidavit be filed within a period of two weeks. In the meantime, the petitioner will deposit Rs. 33,000/- with the respondent-School. On deposit of the amount, the respondent-School will release all the necessary and required documents in favour of the petitioner.” Counsel for the petitioner submits that sum of Rs. 33,000/- has been deposited in addition to earlier amount of Rs. 11,000/-, which was deposited. Accordingly, the order has been complied with. Mr. Rathee still says that the petitioner would be required to make good the amount, as per the reply filed. Since this Court has already applied mind and come into the conclusion that sum of Rs. 44,000/- was required to be deposited by the petitioner, in view the earlier stand taken by the School, no further amount would now be payable by the petitioner. With the deposit of the amount, the writ petition is rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. The documents of the petitioner have already been released. School would not be entitled to any further amount. August 18, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE