IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.127 of 2007 BIRENDRA PRASAD CHAUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 6 2.9.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the opposite parties. This revision application has been filed against the order dated 7.11.2006 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court,Vaishali at Hajipur in Misc .case No.202 of 2003/ Tr.No.1329 of 2006 thereby the petitioner has been directed to pay maintenance at the rate of Rs.800/- per month to his father, opposite party no.2. I have considered the submission of learned counsel for the parties and also perused the impugned order. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, It is quite apparent that the court below has rightly granted maintenance to opposite party no.2. I find no illegality or impropriety in the impugned order which warrants interference under revisional jurisdiction. Accordingly, this revision application is dismissed. The petitioner is directed to pay maintenance to his father as directed by the court below in the impugned order. B.Jha (Ghanshyam Prasad)