IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-20804 of 2008 Date of decision : 9.9.2008 Harbhagwan Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. J.S.Bedi, Advocate for petitioner Mr. Shilesh Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab S. D. ANAND, J. At the time of motion hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner was not alleged to have caused any injury to the deceased; that the injury attributed to him was on the person of an injured PW and that injury had been found to be simple in nature. It was also argued at that time the petitioner is in custody for the last about two years. Learned State counsel is not in a position to contest the correctness of the averments noticed in the order granted at the time of motion hearing. Bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhatinda. September 09, 2008 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE