IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE S.A.No.222 of 2006 (Shri.Maruti Dagadu Jadhav V/s.Shri.Y.J.Chincholkar) ____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memo- ¦ -randa of Coram, Apperances¦ Court’s or Judges Orders Courts orders or directions¦ and Registrar’s orders ¦ -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.S.V.Gavand for the Appellant. Mr.P.S.Dani for the Respondent. CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J. CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J. CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J. DATE : 22nd June, 2006 DATE : 22nd June, 2006 DATE : 22nd June, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Perused the trial Court’s judgment. The suit filed by the Appellant was for the perpetual injunction. The trial court, after considering the evidence, specially the admission of the plaintiff that he was not in physical possession of the suit land, has dismissed the suit. The lower Appellate Court has concurred with the findings of the trial Court. There is no substantial question of law involved in this Appeal. Hence, Appeal stands dismissed. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)