IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11950 of 2009 1. PINTU KUMAR 2. SRIKANT SINGH ----- Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 22.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that for the land dispute in between the parties there may be some incident but a general and vague allegation is made against all including these petitioners also while they were not the participants. The matter was investigated by the I.O. who submitted charge sheet showing petitioners innocent but cognizance is taken. Further submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that initially it was a case under section 307 IPC which later converted into section 302 IPC after the death of the injured victim and there can be no motive gathered for killing. However, in course of investigation their involvement was not found, so, they are entitled for anticipatory bail. I agree with the submission. In the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Vaishali P.S.Case No.99 of 2007, the above named two petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI