FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3557 OF 2011 1- HARISHWAR BHASKARRAO GORE 2- KRUSHNA LAXMAN SURASE. VERSUS THE STATE OF MAH ... Advocate for Applicant(s) Mr. Chatterji Joydeep APP for Respondent(s) Mr. D.R.Korde. Smt. S.D.Matkar advocate for complainant ... CORAM SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. Dated September 13, 2011 ... 1. Perused investigation papers, which were made available for the inspection purpose, as well as heard learned respective counsel for the parties, finally. 2. After hearing the learned respective counsel for the parties extensively, Mr. Chatterjee learned counsel for the applicant No.1 namely Harishwar Bhaskarrao Gore, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw present application to the extent of said applicant No.1. 3. In view of said submission, leave granted and present application stands dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of finally, to the extent of applicant No.1 namely Harishwar FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Bhaskarrao Gore. 4. As regards applicant No.2 namely Krushna Laxman Surase, he has preferred present application seeking anticipatory bail, apprehending his arrest under Crime No. 90/2011, registered at Maujpuri Police Station, District Jalna for the offences punishable under sections 325, 326, 143, 147, 148, 149, 504 of Indian Penal Code. 5. At the outset interim anticipatory bail was granted to the applicant No.2 Krushna Surase by order dated 16.8.2011. 6. It appears that offence has been registered on the basis of the complaint lodged by one Nagorao Panditrao Gore on 18.7.2011 in respect of the occurrence of the incident on12.7.2011. It also appears that name of the applicant No.2 Krushna Surase has not been disclosed in the First Information Report, except at the fag end thereof, alleging that he assaulted the complainant by fist blows and leg kicks alongwith applicant No.1 and allegations made against said applicant No.2 are restricted to that extent and not beyond that. Hence, interim protection granted to the applicant No.2, deserves to be made absolute. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders 7. In the result, present application is allowed partly to the extent of applicant No.2 Krushna Laxman Surase and it is directed that in the event of arrest of applicant No.2 Krushna Laxman Surase, under crime No.90/2011, registered at Maujpuri Police station, District Jalna, he be released on bail, on furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/-, with one surety in the like amount, on the following conditions. i) The applicant no.2 shall give attendance before the concerned Investigator twice in a week i.e. on every MONDAY AND THURSDAY between 05.00 p.m. to 07.00 p.m. till filing of the Charge sheet and shall cooperate in the investigation. ii] The applicant no. 2 shall not influence upon the witnesses, and/or tamper with the prosecution evidence, directly or indirectly, in any manner, what so ever. 8. Present application stands dismissed as withdrawn in respect of applicant No.1, as mentioned herein above. Present application stands disposed of finally. These observations are the primafacie in nature, same may not be used in any other matter, being decided on merits. ( SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. ) aaa/- ***