IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 4TH APRIL 2011 / 14TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 10739 of 2011(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- C.L.JOSEPH, CHIRAYIL HOUSE, ETTUMANOOR, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.LIJI.J.VADAKEDOM RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. TAHSILDAR-PERUMEDU TALUK, TALUK OFFICE PEERUMEDU, PEERUMEDU P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT-685603. 2. VILLAGE OFFICER-KOKKAYAR, KOKKAYAR VILLAGE OFFICE, KOKKAYAR P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT-685603. 3. DISTRICT COLLECTOR-IDUKKI DISTRICT, COLLECTORATE, PAINAVU P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT-685603. BY G.P.SRI. P. NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/04/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ........................................... W.P(C).NO.10739 OF 2011 ............................................. Dated this the 4th day of April, 2011. JUDGMENT Petitioner submits that Ext.P4 is an application made by him before the first respondent for the issuance of genuineness certificate in respect of the property mentioned therein. According to him, on the application, the first respondent has already obtained Ext.P5 report from the Village Officer. Even thereafter orders are not passed on Ext.P4. It is stated that the reminders made by the petitioner did not evoke any response. It is complaining of the above, this writ petition is filed. As at present Ext.P4 application made by the petitioner is pending before the first respondent and what is required is that the first respondent should consider Ext.P4 in the light of Ext.P5 report and pass orders thereon. This is the first respondent shall do as expeditiously as possible at any rate within six weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Sd/= ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. cl /true copy/ P.A. to Judge