IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M.No.M-15807 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 9.7.2009 Saurav Khanna ...Petitioner. Vs. State of Punjab ..Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present : Ms.Rajwinder Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Ranbir Singh Rawat, AAG Punjab. RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J.(Oral) Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner stood only guarantor whereas the main accused is father of the petitioner, who had taken loan of Rs.7 lacs from the Bank on 4.5.2004 fraudulently by depositing title deeds of his sisters Kanta Chopra and Sunita Aggarwal. She further submits that pursuant to the order dated 4.6.2009, the petitioner has joined investigation. This fact is admitted by the counsel for the State on instructions received from ASI Nirmal Singh. Be that as it may, without commenting on the merits of the case, order dated 4.6.2009 is made absolute. The petitioner shall keep on joining investigation as and when called for. He shall also abide by the provisions of Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petition is disposed of. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) 9.7.2009 JUDGE Meenu