THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1865 of 2008 Date: 24.03.2008 Between: Sagilala Siva Lasya … Petitioners AND The Superintendent of Police, Nellore district. And others … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri T.C.Krishnan Counsel for respondents: A.G.P. for Home HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1865 of 2008 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus to direct respondents 1 to 3 to give protection as and when it is necessary in pursuance of the complaint filed by the petitioner on 23.1.2008. The petitioner, who claims to be aged 19 years 7 months, averred in her affidavit that she fell in love with one Mr.M.Bujji Babu, son of Peraiah, aged 24 years and they got married on 21.1.2008 in a temple. She further stated that since her parents are against the said marriage, they gave complaint before the respondents and she apprehends that the respondents may arrest the petitioner’s husband and hand over her to her parents. In the counter affidavit filed by the Sub Inspector of Police, Naidupet Police Station, Nellore district, it is stated that on the complaint given by the mother of the petitioner stating that her elder daughter was found missing and that one Mr.Bujji Babu, the brother of Smt.Ratna Kumari with the assistance of the husband of Ratna Kumari and other friends Rajendra, Poola Balaji and Naveen kidnapped her daughter, a case was registered as crime No.12 of 2008 under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code on 22.1.2008 and that the investigation is under progress. On 10.3.2008 this Court directed the learned counsel for the petitioner to ensure the presence of the petitioner alongwith M.Bujji Babu who allegedly kidnapped the petitioner. Today both of them are present. At the hearing, this Court questioned the petitioner whether Mr.Bujji Babu, who is also present in the Court, kidnapped her. She stated that she went with the said person on her volition and that they got married on 21.1.2008 against the will of their parents. This statement of the petitioner is taken on record. Since this Court is satisfied that the petitioner was not kidnapped by M.Bujji Babu and that on the other hand she went with him on her own volition, the respondents are directed not to proceed with the case registered against the said Bujji Babu. With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.Nos.2324 and 7430 of 2008 filed by the petitioner seeking interim relief are dismissed as infructuous. ___________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:24.03.2008 mdaa