IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7002 of 2009 CHHOTHU RAUT SON OF LATE JHULAN RAUT, RESIDENT OF MAUJA SHRINAGAR, P.S. NAUTAN, DISTRICT WEST CHAMPARAN …. PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. RAM CHANDRA MAHTO SON OF LATE HARI DAYAL MAHTO 3. INDRADEO MAHTO SON OF LATE HANUMAN MAHTO 4. RAMDEO MAHTO SON OF LATE HANUMAN MAHTO 5. SUKDEO MAHTO SON OF LATE HANUMAN MAHTO 6. SUNDARPATI DEVI WIFE OF LATE SUBHA MAHTO AND DAUGHTER OF LATE HANUMAN MAHTO, ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SHRINAGAR, P.S. NAUTAN, DISTRICT WEST CHAMPARAN 7. DRAUPADI DEVI WIFE OF SARJUG MAHTO AND DAUGHTER OF LATE HANUMAN MAHTO, RESIDENT OF MAUJA HARSIDHI, P.S. HARSIDHI, DISTRICT WEST CHAMPARAN AND 8. SK. JEEWAD SON OF SK. SUBEDAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KUNJRI KUJLAHI, P.S. NAUTAN, DISTRICT WEST CHAMPARAN …. OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 2. 23.8.2010 The petitioner is the complainant, upon whose statement Complaint case No.2322 of 2004 was instituted and is aggrieved by the order dated 16.1.2006 of the Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran, by which he has taken cognizance only against some of the accused persons. In my view, the order is well reasoned. I see no reason to interfere with the same. The application is dismissed. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )