IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 17002 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.12.2010 Chaman Lal, Sarpanch .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Ms. Jatinder Jit Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Satish Bhanot, Addl. A.G. Punjab Mr. V.K. Sandhir, Advocate and Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate for respondent No. 5 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the respondent-State and respondent No. 5 fairly stated that impugned order be quashed with liberty to the respondent-State to hold fresh enquiry and to pass order in accordance with law. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent-State, present petition is allowed. Impugned order is quashed. However, liberty is granted to the respondents to hold fresh enquiry and to pass appropriate order in accordance with law. (ALOK SINGH) 08.12.2010 JUDGE reena