IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14372 of 2009 VISHNUDEO URAWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.15751 of 2009 JAMIL AKHTAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 12.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Both the applications for anticipatory bail arise out of Bhargama P.S.Case no. 138 of 2008, have been heard together. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that finding some wrong either illegality or irregularity, F.I.R. was lodged for the selected candidates who were discharged from their service. They all approached the High Court where the Court held in C.W.J.C.NO.1617 of 2008 that irregularity was only there so candidates were given fresh opportunity in fresh counseling which never can be made ground for petitioners’ arrest at the moment. I agree with the submission. In the discussed suggested facts and circumstances, the petitions for anticipatory - 2 - bail are allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Bhargama P.S.Case No. 138/08, corresponding to G.R.No. 2860 of 2008, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI