HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No:5675 OF 2010 Dated: 10.12.2010 Between: Vaddi Srinivasa Rao. ..Petitioner And 1. Ahmed Khan and another .. Respondents This Court made the following HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No:5675 OF 2010 ORDER: This is a revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to revise the docket order dated 13.07.2006 passed in A.S.No.115 of 2004 by the VIII Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Vijayawada. In the impugned order, it was recorded that the counsel for the appellant is in the habit of sending false petitions to the High Court and he also publicly pronounced that he will send a petition to the High Court, and hence, it is not proper to pronounce judgment. Call on 28.7.2006. Hence, the present revision is filed by the Counsel, who appeared for the appellant before the Court below, seeking to expunge the remarks in the order impugned herein. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and perused the material available on record. The revision petitioner is present in the Court. When he was called upon to verify the letter sent by him, he pleads that the letter addressed by his client was not within his knowledge. But the tenor and contents of the complaint made by the appellant in the A.S.No.115 of 2004, appear to have been drafted by an Advocate. But, it cannot be said as to whether the author of the said letter is the petitioner or some other advocate. The report sent by the VII Additional District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Vijayawada, FAC of VIII Additional District & Sessions Judge (FTC), Vijayawada enclosing the copy of letter addressed by Ahmed Khan, dated 11.7.2006 to the Hon’ble Chief Justice of the High Court and also to the Principal District Judge, Krishna, Machilipatnam, discloses untoward comments made against the Presiding Officer by the appellant, which has caused the Presiding Officer to get in a fit of anger to record the same on the docket. But it is not all warranted in the circumstances of the case. In view of the above circumstances and in order to put a quietus to the litigation and also to maintain harmoniousness, this Court feels it just and proper to expunge the remarks made against the revision petitioner in the order impugned and hence, the remarks made against the revision petitioner in the course of the order impugned herein, are hereby expunged. Accordingly, the civil revision petition is allowed. No order as to costs. ________________________ Justice A. Gopal Reddy Date: 10th December, 2010 Nn. HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No:5675 OF 2010 10.12.2010