^ ,-- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASFUR WRIT PBTITION (Sl N0. 7-25^ OF 2011 PETITIONER : RESPONDENTS: r6?. •s^y .c«:y'~ ...-'•'' ^&-" ^ Raj Kumari Ahirwar, D/o Laxmi Prasad Ahirwar, aged about 22 years, R/o village Block Colony, Janakpzu-, Post Janakpur, Thasil Bharatpur, District Korea (CG). Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). 2. Collector, Korea, District Korea (CG). 3. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Bharatpur, District Korea 4. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Bharatpur, Korea WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OP THE CONSTITUTION OF IITOIA The petitioner, above named, most humbly an^t respectfully beg to submits as under: - ! Details of the petition: - ; 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER : - As mentioned in the cause titie. (^ ?r HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON'BLB MR. JUSTICE PRITlKKER DIWAKBR W.P.jS'j.NO. 7226/2011 Petitioaer Rai Kumari Ahirwar versus Respoadezsts State ot' Chhattisgarh Others Shri Jitendra Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Bhaskar P}rasi, P.L. for the State. (02.12.2011) Grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that though he has applied for grant of permanent caste certificate in the year 2008, only a temporary certificate has been issued tili date whereas his appiication for issuance of permanent caste certificate is still pending before the respondent No.4. Counsel for the petitioner submits that if the petitioner is legally entitled for the issuance of permanent caste certificate, the respondent No.4 under no circumstances can withhold the same though he is empowered to pass an order subject to verification of the caste of the petitioner. He t'urther submits that on account of non-issuance of caste certificate, the petitioner is in difficulty because the appointing authority is insisting for submission of his permanent caste certificate and in absence of which any day the services of the oetitioner would be terminated. He further submits that in identical case this Court has passed order directing the State Govemment to decide the issue of caste certificate. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the grievance of the petitioner, the respondent No.4 is directed to expedite the proceedings of issuance of caste certificate in favour of the petitioner and to decide his,app.Iication in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably ' within three months from the date ot' receipt of oopy of this order, Till tHe matter is finaUy decided by respondent N0.4, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner. With the above obseryation, the petition is finally disposed of. It'would be the duty of the petitioner to apprise the respondent N0.4 Sbout the passing of this order. Pritinker Diwakar Judge *