1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11994 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & N.D. DESHPANDE,JJ. DATE : 18th November, 2009 PER COURT : 1. This is an application for condonation of delay. Heard Shri Shinde, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Bayas, counsel for the respondent NO.1 2. The applicant is seeking a review of the order passed by this court dated 17th August, 2009. There is a delay of 29 days in filing the application. The grounds for condonation are stated in para.2 of the application, stating that after the impugned order was passed on 17th August, 2009, the applicant consulted his advocate and sought advice in the matter. It is submitted that necessary documents were collected and on the advice rendered to him, the applicant has chosen to file the review 2 application. 3. When the order of which the review is sought was passed by this court, the counsel for the applicant was very much present and he was heard. Not only this, but the applicant himself had filed an intervention application in the main petitoin, which was allowed. 4. It is clear that all the documents were very much available with the applicant when the order under review was passed. 5. We do not find that any sufficient cause has been made out in the application for condonation of delay. Hence, the application is rejected. [N.D. DESHPANDE,J] [B.R. GAVAI,J.] grt/-