IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14123 of 2011 1. NARAYAN CHOWDHuR. 2. Satyendra Chowdhur Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 31 .05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner No. 1 is the father of the deceased, petitioner No. 2 who is the brother of the deceased have been made accused by the in-laws of the deceased for the offence registered under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation in the F.I.R is that the dead body of the girl was recovered from a well and an F.I.R was instituted by the informant who happens to be the brother of the husband of the deceased. Surprisingly, the husband had not filed this case earlier to the filing of the present case. A case was instituted against the in laws i.e. Cr. Misc. No. 3334 of 2011 under Section 498A, 304(B) of the I.P.C and 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, this complaint case has been dismissed but the copy has not been sent to the police station. It is not clear whether the police instituted a case or not against the informant and his family members. It appears that the petitioners have been made accused in this case at the behest of the In-Laws of the deceased. A statement has been made that the deceased was tortured by husband and in-laws for demand of dowry. It is submitted that it is conceivable that the parents could have killed their own child. Be that as it may, the above named petitioners are 2 directed to be released on bail in connection with Beniyapur P.S. Case No. 171 of 2010 furnishing bail bond of rupees ten thousand each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran. Prakash ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)