IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1258 of 2007 MD. SARIFUR RAHMAN @ SHERU Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 11.8.2008. This Cr. Revision has been filed for setting aside the order of acquittal in respect of opposite party nos. 2 to 5 dated 31.7.2007 passed by Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya in Sessions Trial No. 26 of 2005/12 of 2005. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the Court below has wrongly acquitted the opposite parties whereas on the same evidence he has convicted two persons namely husband and mother-in -law of the deceased lady. Considered the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned judgment. Having regard to the facts and circumstances as well as grounds given by the lower court for acquittal of opposite party nos. 2 to 5. I see no reason to interfere in the impugned order of acquittal in respect of opposite party nos. 2 to 5. Accordingly, this Cr. Revision is dismissed at the admission stage itself. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)