IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.M.Nos.10464-65-CI of 2011 in/and RFA No.4611 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:02.11.2011 State of Haryana and another ....Appellants Versus Daya Ram ....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Hawa Singh Hooda, Advocate General, Haryana with Mr. H.S.Lalli, Addl.Advocate General, Haryana. * * * RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL) At the outset, learned State Counsel has stated that on a similar application filed in RFA No.4218 of 2011 titled as The State of Haryana and another vs. Khazan Singh and other connected matters decided on 23.08.2011, this Court has not accepted the explanation for condonation of delay on similar ground and therefore, the instant appeal is liable to be dismissed being time barred. In view of the aforesaid submission and the reasons mentioned in the aforesaid judgment of this Court, the applications for condonation of delay in filing and refiling are rejected. Accordingly appeal is also dismissed as time barred. November 02, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) savita JUDGE