IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29307 of 2010 RAJA RAM & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.08.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 3 and 4 of the D. P. Act. It is alleged that the petitioners’ side took some money and other articles at the time of engagement on 24.04.2010 but subsequently the marriage was not performed nor the alleged articles were returned which resulted into lodging of the present case on 27.06.2010. It is submitted that the petitioners’ side lodged the informatory petition before the learned C.J.M., Rohtas on 15.06.2010 alleging that actually the marriage was not fixed and no engagement was performed singly the petitioners were invited on lunch. Without expressing any opinion of the merits of the case since the petitioners’ side lodged the informatory petition on 15.06.2010 and the present case was lodged subsequently on - 2 - 27.06.2010, let the petitioners, Raja Ram, Dipika Ramadhar, Virendra Kumar and Sandhya Kumari alias Sandhya be released on bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Akhorigola P.S. Case No. 71 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Rohtas at Sasaram, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)