IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.348 of 2008 BRIJ BHUSHAN MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 4.2.2009 KHAN The petitioner and respondent nos.5 to 8 are step brothers. The petitioner claims to be the son of first wife where as respondents 5 to 8 are sons of his father from the second wife. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondents 5 to 8 have filed Title Suit being T.S.No.119 of 2001 in which an injunction petition was also preferred which was also refused by the learned court below. He further submits that some of the private respondents are accused in a case of murder being Sultanganj P.S. Case No.132 of 1993. He further submits that in Hindu Law the second marriage itself is void so far as first wife is alive and as such the respondents could not have the same right in the property as the petitioner. He submits that the respondents time and again come to his house and threatened him with pistol and as such the petitioner apprehends danger to his life any moment from the aforesaid respondents. He submits that he has filed a representation in this respect before various authorities. Having heard counsel for the parties, this court is of the view that the petitioner would file a representation before the A.S.P., Patna who will look into the mater and do the needful in accordance with law after noticing the other side. (S.P.Singh,J) - 2 -