Crl. Misc. No. M-30814 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : Crl. Misc. No. M-30814 of 2011 Date of Decision : November 03, 2011 Smt. Nisha Thakur .... Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. Siddharth Sanwaria, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Padam Kant Dwivedi, Advocate for the complainant. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Accused Nisha Thakur has filed the instant petition for anticipatory bail in case FIR No.100 dated 14.09.2011, under Sections 420 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Cantt. Ferozepur. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file. Crl. Misc. No. M-30814 of 2011 2 According to the prosecution version, the petitioner, along with her co-accused, received Rs.8,02,000/- from the complainant for sending his son and daughter-in-law abroad. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that it is a false case. On the other hand, learned State counsel, on instructions from Head Constable Ramesh Kumar, and also counsel for the complainant submitted that amount of Rs.8,02,000/- has been received by the petitioner and the same has to be recovered from her because complainant's son and daughter- in-law were not sent abroad by the petitioner. Keeping in view all the circumstances, but without meaning to express any opinion on merits of the case, I do not find it to be a fit case to extend the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Dismissed. November 03, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE