IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2688 of 2009 IFTEKHAR ALAM @ MUNNA JEE, son of Faizul Hussain, resident of village Mehsaul, P.S. Mehsaul, Dist. Sitamarhi---------petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR----------------opp.party ----------- 2. 8.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional P.P. for the State. The petitioner prays for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 420 of the IPC and Section 138 of the N.I.Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had earlier filed a complaint case against the complainant of the present case and after the cognizance was taken and summonses were issued in the said case the present complaint case has been filed. It is further submitted that the petitioner’s cheque was not dishonoured on account of insufficient funds but on account of the stop payment order issued by the petitioner to the Bank, since the complainant had failed to comply with the earlier agreement between the parties for transferring the land in lieu of which the cheque had been issued. 2 On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court does not consider it a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail is, accordingly, rejected. (Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.) spal/