1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.488 OF 2009 (Govinda Krishnaji Thokale vs. State and another) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND P.B. VARALE, JJ. DATED : SEPTEMBER 29, 2009 Heard Ms. Rane, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Shri Mandpe, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents. Ms. Rane, learned Counsel for the petitioner, states that grievance of the petitioner is in respect of inaction on the part of the respondents to decide the application of the petitioner for grant of furlough. Shri Mandpe, learned Additional Public Prosecutor states that application of the petitioner has already been decided by the competent Authority vide order dated 6.6.2009 whereby petitioner was 2 granted furlough leave. In the circumstances, cause of action in the criminal writ petition no more survives. Hence, the criminal writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE JUDGE khj