1 C.P. No.313/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.313 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.7135 OF 2008 Satyabhamabai w/o Eknath Narwade and another ... PETITIONER VERSUS Deobai w/o Bansi Narwade and another ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri B.G. Sagade Patil, Advocate for the petitioners Shri V.I. Thole, Advocate for respondent No.1. ..... CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATED : 25th July, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This contempt petition is filed alleging disobedience of the order dated 16.1.2009, passed by learned Single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No.7135/2008. It is the contention of the counsel for the petitioner that, in spite of the undertaking given by the counsel for the respondent No.1 while passing order dated 16.1.2009, that the respondent No.1 will not alienate the property, the General Power of Attorney is executed in favour of one Dhammasing. 2 C.P. No.313/2010 2. In pursuant to the notice issued in this contempt petition, affidavit-in-reply is filed by respondent No.1. The relevant portion from the said affidavit-in-reply reads thus : “As on today the property is neither alienated nor created any third party interest and the property is in my possession and I am cultivating the same. I, therefore, say that, I have not committed any breach of the order passed by this Hon’ble Court nor dealt with the property.” 3. In that view of the matter, in my opinion, there is no any disobedience as such as alleged in the petition. The property is in possession of the respondent and is not alienated or no third party right is created. Contempt Petition stands disposed of. Notice stands discharged. ( S.S. SHINDE, J. ) fmp/cp313.10