IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.24666 of 2009 VINAY VERMA, SON OF JUGAL KISHORE ROY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BITHOSHARIF, P.S. CHANDAUTI, DISTRICT GAYA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The case is under section 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 25 (1-B) A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. As per the prosecution case, petitioner along with others while plying Sumo car intercepted one truck and looted some cash from the occupants of the truck. It is said that later on, the informant and others chased the accused persons and apprehended them and from their possession some cash and unlicensed arms were recovered. Petitioner is said to have made extra- judicial confession. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on account of overtaking the police vehicle, the petitioner and others invited the displeasure of the police party and due to which they have falsely been implicated in this case. Cash allegedly looted from the truck occupants has not been recovered either from the vehicle of the - 2 - petitioner or from his possession. It is said that petitioner is in custody since 10.1.2009 and he has no criminal antecedent. Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 10.1.2009 and he has no criminal antecedent, the application is allowed. Petitioner (Vinay Verma) is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati at Gaya in connection with Barachaty P.S. Case No.14 of 2009 (G.R. No.27 of 2009). B.T (J.N. Singh, J.)