IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 10TH JUNE 2011 / 20TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 15715 of 2011(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MOIDUNNI HAJI, S/O.MAMMU, AGED 55 YEARS, KANDAMKULANGARA HOUSE, PERUNTHURUTHY P.O., PERUNTHURUTHY DESOM, PAZHAJI VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER/RDO, OFFICE OF RDO, AYYANTHOLE P.O., THRISSUR DISTIRCT. 2. VILLAGE OFFICER, KARIKKAD VILLAGE OFFICE, KARIKKAD P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. SENIOR GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J -------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.15715 OF 2011 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of June 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers: i) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to remove the ordinary soil from the Ext.P1 property up to the road level to enable the petitioner to start the construction of the building as per Ext.P2 building permit. ii) Issue a writ of mandamus directing 1st respondent to consider Ext.P5 request submitted by the petitioner and pass orders on the same within a time limit. Iii) Issue a writ of mandamus directing 2nd respondent to submit a report to the 1st respondent forthwith to enable him to issue permit to the petitioner to remove the soil from the property. iv) Issue such other relief as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is given to the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P5 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a reasonable time. 3. Heard the learned Govt. Pleader as well. W.P.(C) No.15715/2011 2 4. In the above circumstances, no 'fact adjudication' is necessary in the hands of this Court. The 1st respondent is directed to consider Ext.P5 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 'six weeks' from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. 5. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the Writ Petition before the 1st respondent for taking further steps. Writ Petition is disposed of. vdv P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE