IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14023 of 2011 Shatrudhan Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ganpati Trivedi, Mr. Mandan Mohan, Advocates For Respondent No. 5 : Mr. Vijay Kr. Singh, Mr. Dronacharya, Advocates For the State : Mr. Mrigendra Kumar, A.C. to S.C. 10 ………………… 2 13.09.2011 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application to file an appeal available under law before the appropriate authority. Learned counsel appearing for the State and respondents do not have any objection. Permission is accorded. As a result, this application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted to the petitioner. However, if such appeal is preferred before the competent authority, by the petitioner within four weeks from today, then the same should be considered on its own merit and in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties. 2 Before parting with this order, I must indicate that the petitioner has stated in Paragraph- 44 of this writ application that he has filed a representation before the District Magistrate on 09.06.2011 making certain complaints against the concerned Anchal Adhikari. This order would not come in the way of the District Magistrate in considering the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner on its own merit and in accordance with law. Sanjay-II ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)