WP(C) 6254/2007 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY The petitioners, members of the Bharulua Krishi Pam Samabai Samitee Lt d, Sivasagar(for short hereinafter referred to as the ’Society’) though had app roached this court with an array of reliefs including nullification of the pro cess for the constitution of the Managing Committee thereof initiated by the le tter dated 28.9.07, of the Registrar of Cooperative Society, Assam, the resulta nt proceeding related thereto as well as a direction to the Joint Zonal Regist rar, Cooperative Society, Jorhat to complete the enquiry based on their compla int u/s 36(2) and Section 60 of the Assam Cooperative Societies Act, 1949( her einafter referred to as the Act), due to passage of time they seek to pursue a s on date only the outcome of the enquiry as above. I have Heard Mr.P.Kotoky learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms.B.Da s learned State Counsel, Government of Assam. The prefatory facts as laid in the writ petition are that the petitioner s are members of the Society. They had donated arable land to the Society and wh ile they were ploughing the same some time in the year, 2006, the then President and Secretary of the Managing Committee thereof raised commotion whereafter it transpired that they had in league with others sold the same to outsiders .Out o f the confrontation, proceedings u/s 145 and 144 Cr.P.C. followed, the former b eing initiated by the petitioners. The aforesaid complaint was also filed by the m insisting for an enquiry into the reprehensible conduct of the President and S ecretary of the Society and for consequential penal action. While the enquiry wa s thus pending, according to the petitioners, by the impugned notification dated 28.9.07, the Registrar of the Cooperative Society, Assam initiated the process for constituting the Managing Committee of the Society afresh. Apprehending that the process if started would provide a fresh opportunity to the offending Presi dent and Secretary a chance to return to office, they approached this Court for necessary reliefs . Respondent No.4 in his affidavit interalia has stated that following t he enquiry on the representation submitted by the petitioners, the then Managin g Committee was dissolved and the affairs of the society were entrusted to a on e man committee constituted by the Zonal Joint Registrar of Cooperative Soc iety of Jorhat. Mr.Kotoky learned counsel in course of the arguments has urged that thou gh it is represented by the concerned official respondents that an enquiry had b een conducted on the petitioner’s representation, neither they have been furni shed with a report thereof nor they have been intimated the result and the find ings recorded therein. According to learned counsel having regard to the illegal activities of the concerned President and Secretary of the then Managing Commit tee of the Society, they are liable to be disqualified under the Act. Having regard to the rival stands of the parties as disclosed by the abo ve narration and in view of efflux of time , in between, it is considered ap t to close the proceeding with a direction to the Zonal Joint Registtrar, Jorha t to cause completion of the enquiry on the petitioners’ representation, if it has not been culminated as on date. If the enquiry as claimed by the official re spondent has been completed, in the meanwhile, the aforesaid authority would ens ure that a copy of the report in connection therewith, be furnished to the pet itioners at the earliest and in any case not later than two weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order. It would be open to the petitione rs, if so advised, having regard to the said report and the findings recorded th erein to pursue reliefs in law as available to them. No costs.