IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33305 of 2009 1.DEORATH YADAV @ DEORATH YADAV 2.TRILOK KUMAR @ TRILOK KUMAR YADAV, BOTH SONS OF SUKHDEO YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHOURA, P.S. TRIVENIGANJ, DISTRICT- SUPAUL. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 13.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State as also the informant. The allegation against the petitioner no.1 is that he made firing with three nut rifle and the allegation against the petitioner no. 2 is that he is alleged to have given Bhalla blow. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner no. 2 was earlier on police bail. Learned counsel for the State submits that there is specific allegation against the petitioners as such, they are not entitled to the privilege of anticipatory bail. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, prayer for bail on behalf of the petitioners is rejected. However, on surrender in case the petitioners makes application for grant of regular bail in the Court below, the same shall be considered on its own merit in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the present order. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)