1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1867 OF 2005 CIPLA Ltd. and anr. ... Petitioners Vs. Union of India and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Manish Sautrashtri i/by Shantilal & Co. for Petitioner. Mr. Rajeev Chavan with Mr. G. Hariharan for R. Nos. 1 to 4. Mr. H.W. Kane for R. No. 5. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2006 DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2006 DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . On instructions, the learned counsel points out that due to subsequent events, the Petition has become infructuous. In the light of that seeks leave to file fresh petition on the cause of action which is available. In the light of that petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)