1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 455 OF 1999 Akbar S/o Syed Meer .... PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & Oths. .... RESPONDENTS Ms. Surekha Mahajan, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. K.G.Patil, Assistant Govt. Pleader for State. ............................ CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE: 09/08/2010 ORDER ORDER : 1. The petitioner claims that he was appointed as Assistant Teacher in Primary school on 1/4/1965. 2. The petitioner has not been in a position to point out any document to show that the petitioner’s services were approved by the Education Department. On the contrary, while examining the correctness in Writ Petition No. 660 of 1999 which is decided by the order of even date, we have noticed that the said school was closed since 1976-77. As per the application of Ex- Head Masters and Ex- Teachers dated 29/3/1978, the Education Officer has declared the list of teachers entitled to Provident Fund. The name of the present petitioner does not figure in the said list. 2 3. In that view of the matter, no merit is found in the petition. The petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA ] [ B.R. GAVAI ] JUDGE JUDGE knp/CA 76.07 in WP 3921...........96