IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 64 OF 2009 TAX APPEAL NO. 64 OF 2009 TAX APPEAL NO. 64 OF 2009 and and and INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.66 of 2009 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.66 of 2009 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.66 of 2009 The CIT-I Kolhapur ... Appellant vs Kolhapur Zilla Sahakari Dudh Utpadak Sangh Ltd .. Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for Appellant Mr.S.N.Inamdar with Mr.A.R.Jasani for Respondent .. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I.Rebello and : F.I.Rebello and : F.I.Rebello and R.S.Mohite, R.S.Mohite, R.S.Mohite, JJ JJ JJ Judgment/order Judgment/order Judgment/order reserved on: 25th March, 2009 reserved on: 25th March, 2009 reserved on: 25th March, 2009 Pronounced Pronounced Pronounced on: 4th April, 2009 on: 4th April, 2009 on: 4th April, 2009 COMMON ORDER P.C. P.C. P.C. { Per F.I.Rebello, J } { Per F.I.Rebello, J } { Per F.I.Rebello, J } Office objections if any, are dispensed with. Appeals to be registered. 1. The questions which arise in these appeals are same or similar which arose in case of Income Tax Appeal No.997 of 2008 (The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV) vs The Solapur District Cooperative Milk Producers and Process Union Ltd and Income Tax (Lodging) No.290 of 2006 (The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) vs The Kolhapur Zilla Sahakari Dudh Utpadak Sangh Ltd). 2. For the reasons set out while disposing of the said appeals, we find no merit in these appeals which are accordingly dismissed. { R.S.Mohite, J } R.S.Mohite, J } R.S.Mohite, J } { F.I.Rebello, J } F.I.Rebello, J } F.I.Rebello, J }