IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 14071 of 2009 Between: 1 Mallina Lashminarayana, S/o. Atchutaramanna, R/o. Thorredu, Rajahmundry Rural Mandal, East Godavari District. 2 Chitturi Surya Prakasa Rao, S/o. Surya Rao, R/o. Thorredu, Rajahmundry Rural Mandal, East Godavari District. 3 Chitturi Venkata Rama Krishna, S/o. Venkata Rao, R/o. Thorredu, Rajahmundry Rural Mandal, East Godavari District. 4 Uppuluri Satyanarayana, S/o. Latchanna, R/o. Thorredu, Rajahmundry Rural Mandal, East Godavari District. 5 Dandamudi Srihari, S/o. Appa Rao, R/o. Thorredu, Rajahmundry Rural Mandal, East Godavari District. 6 Katragadda Satyanarayan, S/o. Ganga Raju, R/o. Thorredu, Rajahmundry Rural Mandal, East Godavari District. 7 Dandamudi Venkata Ramarao, s/o. Subba Rao, R/o. Thorredu, Rajahmundry Rural Mandal, East Godavari District. 8 Maasina Peda Subba Rao, s/o. Bullaiah, R/o. Thorredu, Rajahmundry Rural Mandal, East Godavari District. 9 Gadde Rama Mohana Rao, S/o. Subba Rao, R/o. Thorredu, Rajahmundry Rural Mandal, East Godavari District. 10 Narukula Annavaram, s/o. Satyanaryana, R/o. Thorredu, Rajahmundry Rural Mandal, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Thorredu Primary Agricultual Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. Thorredu Village, Rajahmundry, Rajahmudnry, East Godavari District. Rep by its Secretary 2 The Commissinoer & Director of Agriculture, Govt of A.P. Hyderabad. 3 The Assistant Director of Agriculture, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. 4 The Mandal Agriculture Officer, Rural Mandal, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more fully in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings of the 3rd respondent in Roc No. A/382/08 dated 27-9-2008 as confirmed by the 2nd respondent vide order No. Fert-II(2)/1162/2008, dated 31-1-2009 is illegal, improper, arbitrary and consequently set aside the same. Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT.K.SESHARAJYAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING The Court made the following : ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court for withdrawal of the Writ Petition. Permission is accorded. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. ___________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J. 15th July, 2009 skmr