IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 450 of 1988 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- KANTILAL K DALIA Versus SHANTILAL M SHAH -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR BHARAT J SHELAT for Petitioner No. 1 NOTICE UNSERVED for Respondent No. 1 NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Date of decision: 09/10/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT On elevation of the learned counsel for respondent no.1 as a Judge of this court, notice was issued to the respondent no.1 for engaging another advocate. However, the notice has come back with the report that the respondent no.1 is not residing at the address and the premises had already been sold. In the circumstances, this revision application has become infructuous and is accordingly disposed of. Rule discharged. ******* hki