IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.1082 of 2011 Decided on: Mar. 10, 2011. Anuradha Sharma …….Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. …….Respondents. _______________________________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr.Adarsh K.Vashista, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr.R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr.Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General with Mr.J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Petitioner is a PTA teacher. She is aggrieved since she has been replaced by the fourth respondent and according to the petitioner, there are convenient places for the fourth respondent. In the event of the petitioner getting willingness of the fourth respondent for working in any of the schools pointed out by the petitioner, the second respondent shall take action in that regard and the petitioner shall be continued in the resultant vacancy. 2. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice Mar.10, 2011 (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tilak/pankaj) Judge.