1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No.4180/2007 (Bhakar Ram vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : August 29, 2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Dr.A.A.Bhansali, for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and the challan papers. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that similarly situated co-accused Smt. Jhamku Devi, Bhanwar Lal and Kamla have been granted bail and the case of the present petitioner is not distinguishable from that of co-accused, who have already been granted bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the fact that similarly situated co-accused have been granted bail as also from the investigation diary, it appears that if at all there had been any demand of dowry, then it was a year ago and as noticed by this Court while granting bail to co- accused Smt. Jhamku Devi in S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail Application No.3898/2007 vide order dt. 21.8.2007, I consider it just and 2 proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Bhakar Ram s/o Chhoga Ram Bishnoi be released on bail in CR. No.106/2007, P.S. Pipar City provided he furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-