IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10524 of 2010 2 26.4.2010 1. Shankar Yadav alias Shankar Kumar Yadavendu 2. Sintu Yadav, both sons of Nageshwar Yadav, Resident ofvillage Ahir Bigha, P. S. Madanapur, District Aurangabad (Bihar) ...... Petitioners VERSUS The State of Bihar ...... Opp. Party. ------- Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that police has not found the case true under Section 307 IPC and submitted charge-sheet only under Section 379 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The materials on record show that one of the injuries on the informant was found to be grievous in nature and in the FIR itself he has stated that the shot by firearm missed his forehead by a whisker. Considering the entire facts and circumstances, it is not found to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. The prayer of the petitioners is, therefore, rejected. This order shall not prejudice the case of the petitioners if they surrender and seek regular bail on the ground of lack of specific allegation against them individually. (Shiva Kirti Singh,J.) sk