IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.5354 of 2011 Date of Decision : July 12, 2011. Amar Singh .....Petitioner versus Financial Commissioner (Revenue) Punjab & Ors .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Sandeep S.Majithia, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 12.10.2010 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Financial Commissioner (Revenue), Punjab, upholding the orders passed by various Revenue Authorities including the Assistant Collector 1st Grade, Amritsar, the Collector, Amritsar as well as the Commissioner, Jalandhar Division, Jalandhar, whereby the application for partition moved by the 5th respondent has been concurrently allowed and that order has been upheld. The Financial Commissioner has categorically held that the joint holding has been partitioned strictly in accordance with the Mode of Partition and also keeping in view the value of the joint land located at more than one places. It has also been observed CWP No.5354 of 2011 [2] that the Sanad Takshim was issued on 16.3.2007 and warrant of possession was also got executed on 4.4.2007. The parties are thus in possession of their respective shares in terms of the final partition. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner at some length and perused the orders. In my considered view, no case to interfere with the impugned orders is made out as no patent error in exercise of jurisdiction or of over- looking of any material facts has been made out. Dismissed. July 12, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE