IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16553 of 2010 JAGDISH YADAV . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02. 7-May-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is father-in-law of the victim lady in a case under Section 304B/34 of the IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the allegations were levelled by the father of the deceased in haste on hearsay evidence but subsequently after about eight months he has filed a petition before the A.C.J.M, Rosera withdrawing all the allegations of torture. The aforesaid fact may be taken into consideration for the purpose of regular bail but since the petitioner is head of the family wherein allegedly dowry death took place, it is not proper to grant him privilege of anticipatory bail. This order shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner if he surrenders and seeks regular bail. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)