IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43935 of 2010 MANOJ KUMAR SINGH S/O HARDEO SINGH, R/O TIURA, P.S. CHUTIYA, DISTRICT-ROHTAS. --PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --OPP.PARTY 2 15.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is the named accused in this Complaint case, being husband of the complainant, carries allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. However, it is submitted that the petitioner intends to resume and continue the marital life with the complainant with all due dignity and honour. To achieve the goal he has already filed one Matrimonial Case no. 162 of 2009 pending before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Sasaram (Rohtas). Considering the facts and circumstances, on the event of filing a petition before the court below by the petitioner stating the intention as stated here with an additional offer to pay a sum of Rs.700/- (Rupees seven hundred) per month by way of ad-interim maintenance for the complainant and the only female child of the couple subject to 2 final order on the point by the competent authority in this regard or any settlement between the parties and begin with payment, the petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram at Rohtas, in Complaint Case no. 1388 of 2009, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioner shall remain present before the court below till disposal of the case. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation or make any single default in payment, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad