IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.8790 of 2010 Date of Decision : August 17, 2010. Avtar Singh .....Petitioner versus Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. And others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Virinder Kumar Shukla, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 10.9.2007 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Managing Director, Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, whereby punishment of recovery of the amount of loss allegedly caused by the petitioner alongwith stoppage of two annual increments with cumulative effect was imposed, as well as the order dated 30.11.2009/1.12.2009 (Annexure P-6), whereby the Appellate Authority has partly accepted the appeal of the petitioner to the extent that the punishment of stoppage of two annual increments with cumulative effect has been reduced to stoppage of two annual increments without cumulative effect. C.W.P.No .8790 of 2010 2 It is urged on behalf of the petitioner that various contentions raised in his grounds of appeal as well as at the time of hearing of the appeal, have not been dealt with by the Appellate Authority. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner at some length and perused the records. The Appellate order (Annexure P-6) nowhere indicates that the petitioner had raised more than one contentions. No interference by this Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction is called for except to grant liberty to the petitioner to move a review/supplementary appeal before the Appellate Authority with specific reference to the contentions which were allegedly raised earlier but have not been dealt with, while deciding the appeal. If such a review application is moved by the petitioner, the Appellate Authority shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law, preferably within a period of three months on receipt of review/ supplementary appeal. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. August 17, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE