IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.2936 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision : 27.08.2009 Sohan Lal .....Petitioner versus Lyallpur Khalsa College, Jalandhar and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.K.S.Dhillon, Advocate, for the respondents. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner-decree holder impugns the order dated 29.1.2007, passed by the Executing Court, Jalandhar, whereby his execution application has been disposed of as having been fully satisfied and the objections raised by the respondent-judgment debtors to that effect, have been accepted. It is not clear from the petitioner's stand as to what remains still to be recovered from the respondent-judgment debtors in terms of the Civil Court decree dated 26.3.2001 passed in his favour? C.R. No.2936 of 2007 (O&M) 2 The revision petition is accordingly disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner-decree holder to file a fresh execution application before the Executing Court, giving specific details of the claims which, according to him, are yet to be satisfied/settled by the judgment debtors. The application, if any, shall be moved by the petitioner-decree holder within 3 months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order, which shall thereafter be decided by the Executing Court on merits, within one year, notwithstanding the impugned order dated 29.1.2007. Disposed of. Dasti. 27-08-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE