1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8013 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders Mr.N.N.Nerlikar h/f Mr.S.T.Shelke,counsel for petitioner. CORAM : R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 3/09/2010 1] The application tendered at interlocutory stage of the proceedings in a pending suit has been rejected by the trial Court. The petitioner original defendant has raised objection to the valuation arrived at by the plaintiff recorded in the plaint. The trial Court on consideration of the contentions raised by the parties, has turned down the application. 2] I have perused application as well as impugned order passed by the trial Court. I do 2 not find any error in the impugned order passed by the trial Court. In exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution, no interference is called for in respect of interlocutory order passed during the pendency of the civil proceeding. Petition is devoid of merit. Hence stands rejected. (R.M.BORDE,J.) umg/wp-8013-10