suws5essV soxea IJuo’ JO UO j IWUOD daG jvoj3PLiV UOjbTA1. puj ( iddv sXJ, TUU1OD SSIILUOO UTO J ) s Aq puszds ‘IBUt3Tt ‘soSTJdJU UUVB v VrAtot ÀY itt Q y(J IL9 !ij ,)Lli LVG /2/ praying b,, quash the cider of lb. Li dt.4.1.94 vide Mnexure C and etc., This writ petitioraI coming on for 1.fl1. 5 this day, the Court made the following • nat In this petiton order of appellate authority refusing to grant the stay of demand is challenged. In the petition, it is staled that the stay apjtieatibn is re3.eted without hearing the petitioner. Noon. is present on behalf of petitioner. the learned ecimsel for the rae poedents has bee heard. In the facts and circias tances of this ease, the endonesent dt4.i.94 is quashed and the appellate authority is directed to hear the petitioner on the ‘b 4. 4 S ‘3/ stay mpgication and thereafter pass order in accordance with isv, if appear is pending. Writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/ JUDO!. Me/a r. by4. COPY 1$ ‘H— Assistant Rtgista, Sigh Court of t;rnøakt ‘ RanEaloro-5N) (411 t’:lt’1 4