IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2268 of 2009 KAILASH PRASAD AGRAWAL Versus RAJENDRA PRASAD AGRAWAL & ORS ----------- 02. 03.11.2009 This petition has been filed for restoration of C.R.No.307 of 2009 which stood dismissed for default as against the substituted heirs of opposite party no.2 due to non-compliance of peremptory order dated 15.05.2009 by which two weeks peremptory time after summer vacation was allowed to the petitioner to take steps for filing requisites for issuance of notice both under ordinary process and registered post on the substituted opposite party. Considering the statements made in this petition, it appears that genuine reasons have been shown which prevented learned counsel for the petitioners from complying the said order. Accordingly, this petition is allowed and C.R.No.307 of 2009 is restored as against the substituted heirs of opposite party no.2 to its original file and number. However, this order will be subject to the compliance of the said order within one week, if not yet complied. Sunil (S. N. Hussain, J.)