wGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 2042 of 201E PETITIONER : Khamhan Singh Bargah. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh 8: Others. WRIT PETLTION UNDER ARTICLE 22§OF THE QQjgSTITUTION OF INDIA $5: Hon‘ble ShiiSatish K. Agnihatn', J.- Present: Shri Somkani Verma, Advocate appearing on behalf of Shri‘Amlt Kumar Sharmal Advocate for the petitioner. Shri MRSB‘natla, Depuiy GA. for the State 0§DER geRAL} (Passed on 30"“ day of April, 2010) . By this petition, the petitioner seek a direction to the respondents to pay iwo advance increments on passing of B.T.I. examination, on his own expenses, before entering into service. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the present case is no ionger res infegra as the same has been considered and decided by the Supreme Court in Ashe Saxena y. Sia‘z‘e of M. P. & Ors.’ Learned counsel further submits that the instant petition is squarely pa covered by the decision as aforestated. Thus, the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the respondent authorities to decide his case for grant of two increments in the light of aforestated decision, subject to verification of the fact of possession of B.T.i. certificate on his own expenses betore entering into service. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with law and in the light of the decision of the Supreme Court in Ashe Saxena (supra) within a period of tour weeks from the date oi receipt of the representation. ln view oi foregoing, according to the teamed counsel appearing for the (T‘I. petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. A“. Wm. Sd/— V Satish K. Agnihotri l Judge i “2069 (in) MPJR tee) 59 W