CWP(T) No. 2362 of 2008. 25.02.2009 Present: Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate for the respondent. Ms. Ranjana Parmar has fairly submitted that it was necessary for the disciplinary authority to assign reasons while dis- agreeing with the report of the Inquiry Officer. She has further submitted that the disciplinary authority will pass fresh orders after taking into consideration the inquiry report. In case the disciplinary authority is inclined not to agree with the inquiry report, he will assign reasons and the petitioner shall also be heard. In view of these observations, the petition is disposed of. The impugned orders dated 5.12.1991 (Annexure A-6) and dated 25.11.1993 (Annexure A-9) stand quashed and set aside. The disciplinary authority shall undertake and complete the entire process within a period of three weeks from today. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), J. February 25, 2009. (sck)