^v d3y IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITIQN N0. 7-L) PETITIONERS .-r. ..^^ \s/^<'^'. \^%-' ..^y ^°\^'..•-•" Shiv SShai Dewangan, S/o Gangarain, Aged 45 years, R/o Taadaria, District Kawardiia. Ram KumarPathak, S/o Ghasiram Pathak, Aged 58 years, R/o Paadaria, District Kavvardha. ^. <-\^"^ -VERSUS- ^ RESPONDENTS v-^f ,0^ ^&^ State' of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Urban Administration & Development Department, D.K. Bhavan, Raipur. Director, Urban Administration & DevelopmentDepartmeHt, GoYemmentofCiihattisgarli, Raipur. 3. Deputy D irector, Urb aii Administration & Development Department, Raipur. Collector, Kawardha. Nagar Panchayat, Paadaria through ChiefMunicipal I .^" Officer. ^ <,/—WRITUNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTlON OF JNDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE WRIT.ORDERS OR )N,' ' ! ! ! . ':. • : '. -. .XI-HC—78 's^ •^IMM^, ^iily'ita, H<niylj,<. ..W..-:P.?.N.O..,.74./2.002.. (• SH^H ^i fs^ "'-HWWSTqW ^iTqig^i'wrai ^ •felst TfSn?R: ^siTOT.W^'I •^^ 14.11.2003 Shri Rajeev Sbrivast^va. Counsel for the jpetitioners. j Shri Qautara Bhaduri. |Dy. Advocate Geaeral £or the State/respondents Nc^.l to 4. Kum. Samata Jain, Ad^. appears on behalf of IShri Prafulla Bbarat» Adv. flor responSent No.5. 1 Heard.' j I ! I Iiearned counael for 4he petitioners siibinits ?.'-'.. ' . J that tbe petitioners have s<)raightaway filed this oetition. He further subsnitis that in this case returns oa bebalf of respon^ents have been filed Shri Shrivastava referred tci paragraph 3 of the return filed on behalf o£ responde^t No.5 whicb reads as unders "3. That the pres^nt petitioa is aot teaable as the saaie is pt-emdture. It is sub'nitted no allotaent orders have been issued in favour o£ any persons. It is jrespectfully subriiitte<3 that tte answering respotldent had only selected three persons for alloti rtt and the proposal is sent , to t,be State Govt. ^or approval and as on the v \ date there is no aliotmeat order hence the pcesent petition is |pre:inature and deserves to be dis^iissed. It i^ further subinitted that 1 \ the petitioners ha3 jnot availed the statutory 2. ;c- 's^^''v^v^,, ^nnpTc', T^'RTT ^p^^;^ ;i^^iE^% 'C1 .f; 'ia'l luu ^T^ °^^('^f^ >•( °riT?;T35 »!<%9;?!is 'a;PltEWR 'nWBf 'q fetzt ^i%R' ^7 SI^T 3li*i?I renedy of appeal be^ore the couacil and has directly rushed jto tbis Hon'ble Court on this Court too ttte present petition is 1 liable to be disinls^ed. Xt is further subraitted that the ^st.ttioner bad not arrayed the persons jwho are sdected for allot.iient as respon^ents and for noa- joirrier of necessar^ parties t,he pefcitioa deservea to be dismjjssed." In view of the statenlent 'nade in the said return, le'arned counsel for the pet.iitio'aer wants to withdraw the jpetition with liberty to niafe representation to the corn- ' . i petent Autbority incl.udiag ^tate Governnent. j Having heard lear,fled lcounsel and considering the facts and circuinstances of t(hs case and aiaterial available on record, the petitioners ^ay aake a detailed representa- 1 . . ' tion which, after bearing ofl tbe parties, shall be consi- Idered and decided on its owri inerits ia accordance with law withia 2 inonths from tbe datte o£ receipt of repcesentation. A copy of such representatic|a shall also be given to respondent No.S-Nagar Panchayat. fandaria. With the aforesaid ofliservation, this petitioa is 1 disposed of at this stage with liberty avail the re;nedy siAwwtofe SS1 3TR?i ^s'it-^^S*. ^ST '<<iAfici-4, ®flly'i]ts,fqc'ii'(-iy,< R7( t-ranR^tean^T • ••^ • ^ wra? ^ 'fetet ^' •^sifOTsn^i AI! -iai- ander the law. Certified copy as pei Sd;- Fakhruddin Judge |^,,.,g,jljtgy!|BS i-j^i.&•u-—.^---