0 ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. ?J¥^/04 PETITIONER Pannafal Sahu, S/o. Shri R.am Sahai, Aged about 40 years. Occupation ,^^^/^^ Service, R/o. Kailashpur, Post ''^'/•''K^.LALl Devnagar, Tahsii Surajpur, District ..••'.•rK. V- Surguja (C.G.) SP<^^7^' ^y^' %^ " - y~ VERSUS RESPONDENTS •.\-' 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary 81 Ministry of General Administration Department D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. Secretary sc Ministry of Tribal and S.T Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Commissibner Tribal and S.T. Development Deptt. Raipur (C.G.) 4. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal 8!: S.T. Development Department, Raipur (C.G.) 5. Block Education Officer, Ramanujnagar, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDCR ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Xt-HC-22 sn^iqii R'li.'h 311^1 ah'Hi=fr ^ffe^ H I!]': i^ ^^ '7Sf '•^PIRTT, '3^'OTS, l«l<li^y an^r ira^? W.P. f^o. -25-77/2-^0^- •,---^ 20d ^irwti aKi* (ci.bctg' an^i^grwafeT 26-8-2004 On a mention being made, this ca^e is taken up. Petitioner/s by Shri A^k S.tf^A.kSA^ ftdvo caf^- State by Shii- V.V.S. Murthy, I[y. Advocate GenSral, with Shri Satish Gupta, D}'.G.A., and SKri Akhil Agrawal and Shiji Sandeep Dubey, Panel La\v}'ers. Heard. • The matter relaies to transfer ot tHi Counsel for the petitionsr/s subm) effeeted illeeally in eontravention of law ^ State counsel submitted that thei ^^.iboui servina notice for demand of iustik Ha'.'ing heard and considered the riva' contentions. without exDressms anv opip-ion on the inents of the case. :n t*~-f sen'cu it a du-ection is siven to the petil ms'her grievances and groimds bet'ore th respondents along with a copy of the peti under the law. shall consider and decide law as e'arly as possible preferably withir notice. the same be cop^i.dered on its o\\n Counsel for ihe petKioner-s pray< any grievance of ihe petitioner/s remain: available under the law. It is open to the p iaw. \Vith the aforesaid obsen.'alions, l|iis petition stancls disposed of. ConsequenTly L\'I.W.P., ifan\\ a's ^NcpN •qfflrif •?fe^ •rfsngt •^srfigHsn^T e petitioner from the respective piace. .tted thatthe transfer ofthe petinoner/s has been nd policy. State counse! opposed it. petitioner's has straightway filed the petiuon :e and represeraation o'?inion of this Court, ends of justice 'nul be ^oner/s to make dstailed representation raising ^ State GovemiT.ent/competent authonty of thc tion and this order. within 10 davs. ai--d on suc'r' representaiion being filed, the State Govetnment'competent authorixy of the respondcn7--/. the same on its own merils in accordan.ee v.'ith six weeks irom the tlate of r.;ceipL'producuon of the representauon. If any contraventjion ot' policy or guidi-iines is brought to the (Tients. that at'ter the decision of the representaiion if I. he/'she mav be allov/ed to avail the remedv ^titioner to avail the remedy avaiiable under the ^ stands disposed c>f. Ceriified copy as per rules. | I Copy to State counsel for compliance. -L Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge