IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 17030 of 2008 Between: M.Chandrakala, W/o. Rama Krishna Reddy, R/o. Gowrelly Village, Hayatnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Joint Collector-II, C.S., Ranga Reddy District at Lakdi- ka-pool, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Collector and Tahsildar, Hayatnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 3 The District Supply Officer, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the order of the second repondent bearing Proc.No.D/1991/2008 dated 08-07-2008 as arbitrary, illegal, violative of Art.14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently to set aside the same and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.SUDERSHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following at the stage of admission: ORAL ORDER: The petitioner’s authorization for the Fair Price shop of Gowrelly Village, Hayatnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District was suspended by the order of the 2nd respondent dated 8.7.2008. Thereagainst, the petitioner preferred an appeal to the 1st respondent on 16.7.2008. Aggrieved that the 1st respondent-appellate authority has neither disposed of the appeal nor the application for interim relief, the Writ Petition is filed. Formally, however the petitioner challenges the 2 nd respondent’s order dated 8.7.2008 suspending her authorization. The petitioner cannot be permitted to pursue parallel remedies. Hence, no decision can be recorded in respect of the validity of the order of suspension, in view of the fact that the petitioner has already preferred an appeal. In the circumstances, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission, after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies, directing the 1st respondent-appellate authority to expeditiously and in any event, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, consider and dispose of the application ﬁled by the petitioner in the appeal, seeking interim relief. There shall be no order as to costs. GODA RAGHURAM, J Date: 06.08.2008 cvm