IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY FRIDAY, THE 29TH JULY 2011 / 7TH SRAVANA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 1736 of 2011() ------------------------- (CC NO.96/2010 IF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PALAKKAD) ------------ PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 --------------------------------------- P.RAVINDRAN,S/O.M.T.PADMANABHAN, AGED 45 YEARS,MAYIKA,KOPPAM AMSOM,PALAKKAD III VILLAGE,PALAKKAD TALUK,PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN RESPONDENTS/ STATE AND COMPLAINANT -------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM. 2. JOSEPH GEORGE,S/O.LATE GEORGE,AGED 64 YEARS, KANNIYILLATHU, PONNAMKODE, MANNARAKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PINCODE 678582. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR R2 BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.MC.No. 1736 of 2011() ------------------------------------- APPENDIX --------------- PETITIONER'S ANNEXURE ------------------------------------ ANNEXURE A1. COPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICE DATED 29.08.2008 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE A2. COPY OF REPLY NOTICE DATED 09.09.2008 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER AND THE OTHER ACCUSED. ANNEXURE A3. COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S.NO.249/2009 OF THE SUB COURT, PALAKKAD. ANNEXURE A4. COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN O.S. NO.249/2009 OF THE SUB COURT, PALAKKAD. ANNEXURE A5. COPYOF THE PROTEST COMPLAINT FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL --------------------------------------- / TRUE COPY / P.A. TO JUDGE VK B.P. RAY, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.M.C. No. 1736 of 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 29th day of July, 2011. O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. 2. The petitioner is the first accused in C.C. No. 96 of 2010 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palakkad for offences punishable under Sections 192, 465, 420, 120B and 82(a) of the Registration Act. I am not inclined to entertain this application at this stage. It is open to the petitioner to file an application for discharge before the trial court and plead for a discharge. If such an application is filed, the learned Magistrate shall pass reasoned orders thereon. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is a business man and his presence may not be insisted upon before the trial court. If the petitioner files an application under Section 205 Cr.P.C on or before 17.08.2011, the same shall be allowed on such terms and conditions the learned Magistrate deems fit. This Crl.M.C. is disposed of as above. sd/- B.P. RAY, JUDGE. rv