“hiW(m) “i 200 mmm WWW ' . . ¥ ““‘Wwm Wmaww ammm 7 §5ingle Benchi Hon'ble Mr. Justice? Dhirendra Mishr-a) WP. s No.M (Pefh‘ion U/A 226 of‘ Sonsfifu5fion of India) Peh’fioners 1. .of Vi Dism‘ t Dh’a’rma’ri (co) Rohid sin, wife of Lakhan Sahu, aged abou‘r 60 years, residen'l' of Village and uri Tahsil and Disfric’r Dham’rari Sukhi am, son of ShrLMansingh Rawa‘r, aged bouT 60 years, resident of Village- Barar Post Achora, Districf Dhamfari (C’G.) Sukhi I Sahu, son of lafe Shri Dauwa Lal ~ Sahu,,aged abouf 60 years, residenf of Villag Nawagaon (Jhura), PosT‘ Borne, Tahsil nd District Dhamtari (C.G.) Sukh Yadav, son of Shri Bodhiram i m Yadav, aged about 60v years, R/o Village- .Bhanp ri, Tahsil and Disfric’r Dhamfari. ‘Posf (6.6.) Ram l Yadav, Son of Shiv Pr'asad Yadav, aged bouT 60 years, residem‘ of Village— Laha afhr‘a, Posf Korra, Tahsil Kurud, Disir cf Dhamfari (6.9.), _Ramd ya! Sahu, son of Late Shri Surif Sahu, aged abou‘r 60 year‘s, residen’r of Villag -Bodr‘a (Waliyar‘a), Pos‘r BhoThli, Tah‘si and Districf Dham’rar‘i (C.6.) Dhan n’jay Nirmalkar, son of Vishambher Nirm lkar, aged abouf 60 years, residenf [age and PosT Kandel, Tahsil and k z a a , i / 19. ' WWWWI'E’Fs/os—l 1 /2oos~—1,oo,ooo. \v r'esid‘mT-of illage-Karr'a, Tahsil Kurud, Disfr‘ c’r Dhamfari (6.6.) 5m. babsir Bai Nemm, wife of 5m DayaHam,1uged abou’r 60 year's, r’esidenT of Gc ngrél Colany, GangreL Pos’r Gangrel, Tahsi and DisTr‘icT Dhamfuri (C.G.) 16. BisahJ Ram, son of Shri Bak'ka Ram, aged abou11 60 years, residenf of Village and Nagr'i Sonu JRum, son of Shri Fremlol Suhuf aged 59 years, resuden‘r of VIHage— Mujegiahan, P.O. Loharsi, Tahsil and Phulma‘f Bai Gond, wife of Shri Sonuram, 'Gond, aged about 60 years, residenf of Villuge—Navegaon ‘(Rudri), Post Rudri, TahSi and Di‘s‘rric‘r Dham’rar‘i (6.6.) Bai, wife of Shri Suklal, aged abou'r 60 y ars, residenf ofJLiJage-BaridkalaV ' edi Bai Sahu, wie of Shri Bishal Sahu, aged abouT 60 years, Resident of Sehr‘afubri, Posf Sambalpur, Tahsil and D sTric‘r Dhamfar‘i (C.G.) Daya m Sahu, son of Budhiyar' Sahu, aged about 60 years, residenf of Village- Gujar , Posf Doma, Tahsil and Disfr'icf Dham ari (C.G.) Smf. ulkunwar Yadav, wife of Lafe Shri Dinu adav, aged abou’r 60 years, residenf \\ 17. .Posf Sondur (Mechka), Tahsil Dis’rr cf Dham‘tari (C.G.) abouf Dism‘cf Dhamfari (6.6.) 18. 20. ' 21. 22. 23. V , h f - ' mmm rel Colony, Gangrel, Post Gangrel, Tahsi and Dis’rric‘r Dhamfari (C.G.) Sm’r. ' 24. of Dham ari (CG’) Smf. aged abou’r 60 years, Borid ala, Sanfipur, Tahsil Gurur', District Durg G.) Kaush Iya Bai, wife of Iafe Shobhara, aged ubouf 60 years, residen’r of Village- Ha’rk hwar‘, Tahsil and Districf Dham‘rari (C.G.) hana’i’ Bai Dhruv, wife of Bi’dhi Ram Dhruv aged abou’r 60 year's, residenf of Amlipara, Post Chanagaon, Tahsil Nagr‘i Disfr'icf Dham‘rari (C.G.) Smf. Fulu Bai, wife of Thanram, aged abou’r 60 years, Caste Teji, residem‘ of Viuag -sondur, P.s. sihav’afTahsil Nagri, Disfr'i f Dhamfari (C.G.) Shrir m, son of Kapoor' Chand, aged abouf 60 ye r's, Cas’re Gada, residenf 'of Village and P s’r Mechka, ‘i‘ahsil Nagri, Dis‘rricf Dham ari (C.G.) Nares Nirmaikar (Dhobi), son of Anjor' Nirma kar, aged abouf 6O year‘s, residem‘ of Vilage—Gujra, Posf Doma, Tahsil and Disfri f Dhamfari (C.G.) anu Bai, Daughfer' of Punau Ram, aged bouf 60 year's, Casfe Teli, Residenf ch‘ka, Tahsil Nagri, Disfr'icf hbai, wife of’ La’re Shri Jefhuram, Residen’r of 25. 26. ‘ 28. 29. 30. ”Wmm:WWwFs/gsé1 1 /2008—~1,00,000~ K g h 'e s C . - ’/ 'wmm Respondem‘s 1. Sfaf of Chhaffisgarh, Through fhe Secr Tary, Wafer ReSources Deparfmenf, D.K. Bhawan, RaipUr (6.6.) Wa (CG 2. The ngineer-In-Chief, Mahanadi Project Resources Deparfrnem‘, Raipur Present: Mr. P.P. Sahu, Adv. for the pefh‘io ers. Mr. Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Advocate Ge era! for the S’raTe. 15.01 .2009 Heard. The pefifiqne’qs by The i stanfr-pefi’rion are praying for . direcfion to The respondenTs To onsider The case of peTiTioners for regulariza’rion/appoin‘rmem ’o ’rhe post of Labourers as per circular dafed 5.3.2008, as The efh‘ioners have complem‘ed more v Than 20 years' of un-inTerrupTed s rvice under’The respondenTs. Learned counsel for~The petitioners submifs Tha’r The peTi’rioners’ represenTa?ion of A nexure P-6 is already pending Considerafion before respondent No.2, howeverfno orders have been paSSed on fheir representat Mr. Thakur, learned Depu‘ly Advocafe General for The S'la'fe submifs fhaf in' case ‘i‘he 'pefifi ners file fresh represenfafion Q WWWW~Fs/95—l 1 /2003—1 ,oo,ooo. ¥ f . i I.m ..............:5;.......::....'.'....‘..............‘.mi 20 am m- (W) ‘ 1! bév before résponden‘r No.2 wi’rhin 1‘ . copy of This pefijrion & order, T decided by respondenf No.2 wi’rhi from fhe dotehof', receipt of repre‘ In view of The above, Thi direcfion To ’rhe pefifioners To n Two weeks from Today, along wiTh v‘ This order, before respondenT No being made, responden’r No.2 is accordance wiTh law wiThin a peri‘ of receipT of The represenTaTion. Certified copy as per rules; mmxwfm‘rm ‘ g ' $§mm 7 / wo weeks from Today along wiTh 1e same‘shall be considered and 1 a furTher period of eighT weeks' ;enTaTion. ; peTiTion is disposed of wiTh a lake fresh represenTaTion wiThin This peTiTion and cerTified copy of 2 herein. On such represenTaTion direcfed To decide The same in Jd ofeighT weeks from The, daTe Sdl- hra mater-(1m . _ Mis i , , Judg’e / W r/ WWWW FS/9s—11/2008 1,00,000. o W 0 ‘ i