IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASKUR. W.P.fSL^o, S6SS QF 2009 £lB^ASaf;a PETITIONER ^ ^p %%. (S^A'. ?.-?:^-x^ .0..^<^'W' ^ <-;;^-;)<fi>r', '•"N..p^v" RESPONDENTS Heera LalKesharwani ^aged 65 years, son of late Gangadeen Kesharwani, Retired Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Karahi(^^^ Post Sargaon, Block Pathariya, District Bilaspur, R/o. Near Ilahabadi Hotel, Ashok Nagar, Chantidih, BUaspur (C.G.) ymssus 1) State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary Department of Education, DKS Bhavan, Raipur Raipur(C.G-) 2) Joint Direetor (Treasury) Account and Pension, Bilaspur Division, Dist-ict Bilaspur (C.G.) 3) District Education Officer, Bilaspur ^{C.G.) :4) HeadMaster, Govt. Primary School, Karhiji';^. Block Pathariya, District Bilaspur(C:G.) WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ii'!1 t'y '^.'- ^« HIGHCQURTOFCHHA'mSGARH;BILASPUR Writ Petitioa (Sl No. 569SM^09 Petitioner Heera Lal IfcsbarBeani Versus Respondcnts State ofChltattisgayi &ofheis wRrr pETmoN UNDER ARTIGLE 226 OF THB CONSTn'UTION OF mDIA (SB: HonlBlc ShriSatish K. Agnjhotn J.) ShdK. S, Pawar, Advcx^te for the petitkuier; Shri A. V. Sltriilhar, Advocate for tte respoiideats. ORDERliOtan (Passed on fbis7thd^ ofNovember, 3009) Hearel. 1. TUe chaltenge ia tliis petition is to fhe order dated 3.11.2006 (Anacxuce' P^2},. whereby a suin of Rs. 29,952^- (Rulpees'Twcai^ Nmc Ttlousaad, Nine Himdltcd atul. F*ifty-tw(4 towaaits eaBBesa payawnt luade to'fhepetitiQrier^hasbeeadnectedto be Becowe»ed- fix)mthe retiral/pensioitatylitenefits. 2. LeanicdcOTmaeIappeariagfiM-t&^tiiliM^su&ai&lfiiat^^^^l^ pctitioner Was not ffven aay opportaxsfy to explam about the paymciit inade to flic petitKme& Ttius, flusorder is vttiateff fiM- waat of cofflpBaaee <xf the j»4D<apfesof natiffial justice aiaff &u" play ia acticm. Leamed counsel furttier suSmits that.'tfaeiBe is;iia; fautt oa the parttrftlic petitibnerand theaatount^is paid tQ.Iumtln aceordanGe witfa ffie pay scales, revised aaxt ffifed by tBe '•^.. . - .• .' ".'' • ••••..' '•i:.:~.'' •" •;...' " • • • '^;.'.:•'.';• • /-; ..' :' ' • "...•' ' ' • ".;'.•:;'- •- respcmdeiitsfioiatmietOtiaM.NOaeasouiiasfeeenass^aeAias^ on which couat Q wccess peymient, S s^, waa'faaSe.'Ftvts icspoadfints canaot Tecover ffie aauHtat, (already paid to tliie petitfeuaer after Uis retiEemjRttt,. tbat too withc^ fcMDiBa^ tto priacqiles ofxiaturaljustice. 6. ThEtfcur -'3 Purshottam Lal Das v. Stete of Bihar, Puajab Natioinal Baiik v. MaajeetSingb and Bffliar SBB v. Bijay Bhadur." Inviewoffhcfbigomg.thepetitionis.anowed.TheiBipugnedorder dated 3.11.2006 (Aiuiexure P/2), directiag recovciy of Rs. 29.952/-, on accqunt of excess pagrment aiade to, fhe pctiUoner, is hereby quashed. The petttioner is entiUed to fidl retiral beiiefite wdtliout any deduction. If fhe amouat has ateady been recoveied, (he petitioner is entifled to the said amQunt with intea-est at fhe rate of6%>per anaum. No order asto costs. Sd/-.:,,.:... SafishK.Agn^trl ^ Judge .!•*.•