IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 1ST PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 15993 of 2003(D) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: ------------ 1. JOSE VARKEY, L.P.S.A. (NOW UNDER SUSPENSION), M.O.L.P. SCHOOL, MUNDA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. A.K. JOSEPH, L.P.S.A. (NOW UNDER SUSPENSION) M.O.L.P. SCHOOL, MUNDA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, NILAMBUR. 3. THE MANAGER, M.O.L.P. SCHOOL, MUNDA, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.T.T.MUHAMOOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 15993/2003/D ORDER ON I.A. NO.593/2003 IN W.P.(C) NO.15993/2003 DISMISSED Sd/- 20.2.2008 S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT. P1: COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 7.3.2003. EXT. P2: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN MFA 702/03 FILED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 10.3.2003. EXT. P3: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SENT BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 25.3.03. EXT. P4: COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED TO THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 3.4.03. EXT. P5: COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED TO THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 3.4.2003. EXT. P6: COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (EDN), MALAPPURAM DATED 21.2.2004. EXT. P7: COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER G.O.(RT) NO.4259/04/G.EDN. DT.30.9.04. ESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: EXT. R-3(A): COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION DATED 19-07-2003 FILED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE JP S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ======================= W.P.(C) No.15993 of 2003 ======================= Dated this the 20th day of February, 2008 JUDGMENT In this writ petition, the petitioners challenge orders of the 3rd respondent manager of the school where the petitioners are working whereby the manager has refused to reinstate the petitioners who were placed under suspension in accordance with the orders of the Assistant Educational Officer on the ground that the manager has filed a revision before the Government against the orders of the Assistant Educational Officer. That was in 2003, almost 5 years have elapsed since then. I do not think that the same situation would be available at this point of time since the suspension would have been culminated to some final orders pursuant to this disciplinary proceedings. Therefore, this original petition is closed. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE jp