IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3815 of 2008 RAJENDRA KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 3. 30.4.2010. After hearing both the sides what appears to this court is that the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Jamui in G.R.No.27 of 2004 does not indicate as to what could the material upon which the petitioner Rajendra Kumar could be said to have committed the offences under which he has been directed to be tried by framing charges. The mere allegation in the written report was that the petitioner was sent by the Branch Manager to the house of the informant and to convey the threat of the accused Branch Manager that if he did not withdraw the prosecution against the Branch Manager then it may prove a costly affair to him. The court believes that merely conveying a message of any proportion of any person may not be an offence, as such, it was required by the learned trial court to point out the paragraphs of the case diary and thereafter to assign reasons as to what offence appeared committed by the petitioner Rajendra Kumar. - 2 - In the result, the order directing framing of charges which was passed on 6.10.2007 is hereby set aside with a direction to the learned trial court who is trying G.R.No.27 of 2004 to hear the parties afresh and pass a proper order which should indicate the material upon which the order is based. This petition is allowed with the above observations. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )