IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6813 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 20.11.2009 Mohinder Singh and another .....Petitioners versus Surjit Singh and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Arvind Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 27.7.2009 passed by the Civil judge (Junior Division), Rajpura, vide which the petitioner-plaintiffs have been directed to affix the ad-valorem Court fee on the sale considerations mentioned in the impugned sale deeds. The petitioners have filed a Civil Suit for declaration to the effect that four sale deeds executed by their mother in respect of her 1/7th share in the agricultural land situated within the revenue estate of Village Sarala Kalan, Tehsil Rajpura, in favour of respondent-defendant Nos.4 to 6, are null and void and cannot affect their rights as legal heirs of their deceased mother. C.R. No.6813 of 2009 (O&M) 2 On an application moved by the respondent-defendants under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, the Civil Court vide its impugned order dated 27.7.2009 has directed the petitioners to affix the ad-valorem Court fee on the sale considerations mentioned in the four sale deeds referred above. Aggrieved, the petitioners have approached this Court. It is not the case of the petitioners that the suit land was a Joint Hindu Family ancestral property or they were the co-sharers during the life time of their mother. They are claiming their rights on the basis of inheritance while the sale deeds had been executed by their mother during her life time. In other words, no relief can be granted to the petitioners unless the registered instruments under challenge, namely, the sale deeds, are set-aside. The petitioners, therefore, have been rightly asked to affix the ad-valorem Court fee in terms of Section 7 (v) of the Court Fee Act, 1870. No interference with the impugned order is called for by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. Dismissed. 20-11-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE