Criminal Misc. No. M-16285 of 2011 (1) IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-16285 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 19.7.2011 Sarto .. Petitioner vs State of Haryana .. Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Manish Soni, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Vermani, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal, J. Prayer in the petition is for grant of pre-arrest bail in FIR No. 85 dated 28.2.2011 registered under Sections 498-A, 406 IPC, with Police Station Kalanaur, District Rohtak. On 25.5.2011 this Court, while issuing notice of motion, noticed following contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner states that complainant, as well as, her sister are married to both the sons of the petitioner. Her sister had no complaint ever against the petitioner. Learned counsel further states that petitioner has never mal-treated complainant and never demanded any property or dowry items. He has further stated that petitioner is an old lady of 62 years and shall co-operate in the investigation.” Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in terms of the order passed, the petitioner has joined the investigation and dowry articles have already been recovered. Criminal Misc. No. M-16285 of 2011 (2) Learned State counsel did not dispute the facts that the petitioner has already joined the investigation and dowry articles have been recovered. He on instructions from HC Subhash submitted that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. Considering the aforesaid facts, interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 25.5.2011 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. 19.7.2011 (Rajesh Bindal ) vs Judge