i § « HIGH COURT OF cHHATnseiARH: BILAs‘PUR Single Bench: Hon’ble Shri Dilip‘ Raosalheb Deshmukh, J. Tr tition (C) No. 2 o[f 2008 etitioner Smt. Neha Klniand'elwal, Wlo Dev'esh Khandelwal, aged about 29 yearsl R/o 386, Samta CoUo‘ny, Raipur. Tahsil and District Ra'ipurKCG) " Versu's Devesh; Khanfdelwal,‘ S/o RadheShyam Khandelwal, aged about 35 years, R/o Diprapara, near Chhattisgarh ’Agra’wa! Dharmshala, ‘ ' High Court Road, Biiaspur (CG) Respondent Transfer Petition under Section 24 of the Cede of Civil Procedure 1 Present: Shri A.K. Praéad, counsel for the ipetitioner. Shri Vimalesh Bajpai, counsel for‘the respondent. ORAL onoER (Passed on 1 0.1 1 .2008) Learned counsel for the‘parties have no objection if this transfer petition is heard finally and decided at the stage of admission. (2) Heard finally. (3) By this petition, the applicant/wife seeks transfer of Family Suit No.146—A/2007 pending before the Family Court, Bilaspur which ha been tiled by the non-applicant/husband under Section 13-A (1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for dissolution of marriage. (4) i'he following facts are not disputed by the learned consel for the parties:- \1‘ \ at Bilaspur, ‘ // Al that, the marriage between the applicant and the non-applicant Was solemnized on, 13.02.2005 at ansfer Pe P s u that smce Aprll 2005 the spouses are hvmg separately, _ § that the applicant/wife hast fied a petition pending before the Prlnmpal Judge Family Court MM. under Sectron 9 of the Hrndu Marriage Act against the non-apphcantjhusband for restltutlon f conjugal rights hat, the appllcant/wife;’ is residing at her matrimonial home at Ralpury (5) Learned counsel for the applicant argued that lt would b convenient not only for the applicant/Wife but also for the non- appllcant/husband if the application Is allowed smce the petltlon fled under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act Is pending at Raipur (6) Learned counsel for the non-applicant/husband opposes the prayer. ‘ ’ (7) Having heard the ”rival submissions l am of the conSIdered opinion that it would be convenient not only for the applicant/Wife but also for the non-applicant/husband if the petition for dissolution of marriage under Section 13-A (1) of the Hindu Marriage Act in Family SUit No 146-A/2007 pending before the Family Court Bilaspur is transferred to PrincipalJudge Family Court Raipur (8) Accordingly, the petition is allowed Family Suit No 146-A/2007 pending before the Family Court Bilaspur is transferred to the Princrpal Judge Family Court Raipur (9) ’ A Family Court Raipur on 1 12-1008 r 3 Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh ' Judge Parties are directed to appear before the Pnncipal Judge Sd-/ a.» I 1 ’: 1 r o t e