1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.1538 OF 2006 PETITION NO.1538 OF 2006 PETITION NO.1538 OF 2006 Zarir Phiroz Khariwala....Petitioner Vs. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors...Respondents Mr.S. Rustomji i/b. Crowford Bayley & Co., for the Petitioner. Mrs.S.Ajitkumarfor respondent No.1. Mr. Sanjay Jain i/b. L.D.Shah & Co., for respondent No.3. CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE: 10th July,2006 P.C. . The petitioner challenged the development permission. Even the basic facts which were required for this Court to consider whether the challenge is available have not been set out. On account of formal defect at this stage learned Counsel seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. No order as to costs. Interim relief granted to continue for a period of four weeks. On expiry of the said period the interim order to stand vacated on its own. (F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J). J). J).