IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34055 of 2010 1. RUMA DAS @ RUMKI DAS 2. MUNMUN DAS 3. BABLU DAS ---------------------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 4.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. For allowing construction, demand of ransom is doubted as parties are at litigating term. A proceeding under section 133 Cr.P.C. was pending. Much foul is shown against the complainant party by making accused to the family members including unmarried girls of the family, in my view also makes a ground for anticipatory bail. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in Town P.S. Case No. 253/2010, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)