IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 10988 of 2008. Decided on: 23.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Sanjay Verma. … Petitioner. Versus H.P. State Electricity Board and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Ms. Anjula Khajuria, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): The only surviving dispute in the present petition is that the petitioner has not been paid the salary for the vacation period. Consequently, there shall be a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in view of the principles laid down by this Court in Baldev Singh versus State of H.P. and others, CWP No.415 of 2000, decided on 1st September, 2008 and to pay and release the salary for the vacation period to the petitioner, within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of the judgment by the petitioner. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - 2. In view of the above observations, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 23, 2010. (sck).