WP(C) 2904/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Mr. S.C. Biswas, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. H. Rah man, learned State counsel. For the order proposed to be passed, it is considered inessential to iss ue formal notice to any of the respondents. The petitioner’s grievance in short compass is that she had offered her candidat ure in response to an advertisement dated 9/1/2010 published in local daily Ass am Tribune initiating the process for selection and appointment to the post of Child Development Project Officer. According to her, on the scrutiny of her cand idature, she was found entitled to be called for interview and as a matter of fa ct, she received an envelope with her name inscribed in it, carrying a call lett er. However, on opening the letter, she found that the call letter was addressed to Ms. Karabi Das mentioning inter alia the date of interview to be 24/5/2010. The petitioner on 17/5/2010 has submitted a representation to the Deputy Secreta ry, Social Welfare Department, pointing out the above anomalies and requesting h im to issue a call letter to her so as to enable her to participate in the inter view as scheduled to be held. As the representation remained unattended and the date of interview is drawing alarmingly near, the petitioner has approached befo re this Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner while reiterating the above, apprised thi s Court that the proposed interview is to continue till 29/5/2010. Mr. Rahman ho wever, is not in a position to offer any comments in absence of instructions. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on a consideration of the p leadings on record, this Court is of the view that the instant proceeding ought to be closed with a direction to the aforementioned authority before whom the pe titioner’s representation is pending to take an appropriate decision thereon. Or dered accordingly. This process as directed should be completed, in view of the paucity of time, by 24/5/2010. Needless to say, if the petitioner is entitled to participate in the interview, the authority concerned would not waste time to take necessary steps to facilitate the same. The petition stands disposed in the above terms. No costs.