"V HIQH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR WritPetiBonisiNo.S003ofaiC6 Petitiorter R.P. Venna, agect atiout 55 yeare, S/o. Late Shri Durga Prasad Verma, 'Co-operatsiiye' inspector (Under Suspension) posted at DPCS, Korba; R/6. Fazal Bada, Juna, Bilaspuf, Near Laxmi Talkies. Resoondents !4•>? .^^ Versus 1) 2) 3) 4) State of Chhattisgarh, through Seoretary, Depattment of Cooperatives, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, CG. Registrar Co-operative Society, Government Qf Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG), Ring Road, Oid R.T.O. Qffice, and near the Police Station: Telibandha, Raipur, CG. Joint Registrar; Gooperative Sooieties, Composite Building, BilaspuF, GG. • Depyty Registrar,—Cooperatiye Societies, ; CollectOFate : Building Kosha Badi, Korba, CG.- -<; V. :f: (Writ petitipn under Artiele 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) SB: Hon'bte S'nri JusticeSiHish K.Agnihdtri Present: Shri D. Shashidharan, cpunsel ftsr the petitioner. . Shri V.V.S, Myrthy, Dy; Advocate Generai fbr the State. ORALORDER (Passedon 7BII'flay,Z>07) I.A.No.1 • • • !; . This is an applioation for taking documeFitson record. The application is oiriered as.pi'ayed for. By this petition, the petitioner has ehalienged the legaiity andvalidity of the order dated 21-2-2006 (AhnexureP@),whereunderthepetitionerwas placed yndersuspension in view ofthe proposed departmental enquiry against tiim.i'He furtherseel^.a ctirectionfo quashthe chaige-slieet dated 30-3-2006. /\ & -^ ^ .2. Learned counse! appearing forthe petitioner submits that enquiry has already been completed and the suspension of.the petitioner has been revoked by order dated 30-4-2007 (Annexure A/1) stating specifically that with regard to the payment of suspension period, the ordei- would be passed at the time of decjsion on the departmental enquiry. 3) In view of the aboye stated facts, the challenge to the suspension order dated 21-2-2006 (Annexure P/3) has become infructuous and also challenge to the charge-sheet dated 30-3-2006 has also beoome infructuous as the enquiry pureuantto the charge-sheet has been concluded Learned oounsel appearing for the respondents-authorities also submits accprdingly. 4) In view of the above stated developments, nothing suri/ives in the mater and this petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as having become infruotuous. However, liberty is reseri,'ed to the petitioner to file appropriate petition, if so advised, in the event of new cause of action anses. Sd/- i SatishK.Agnihotri i Judge Raju ?<