IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 9577 of 2008 Decided on: 21.2.2011. Sunil Datt ……….Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents :Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) It is not disputed that the present lis is covered by the judgment rendered in CWP (T) No. 781 of 2008, titled as Rakesh Chand & others versus State of H.P. and others and Baldev Singh and others versus State of H.P. & others, Latest HJL 2009 (HP), 293. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in view of the principles laid down in the judgments cited herein above, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge February 21, 2011. (hl) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.