2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4356 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.4206 OF 2008 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders 1. Heard Adv. Shri P.M. Gaikwad for the applicant and Adv. Shri P.R. Salunke h/f. Adv. Shri Dilip Bankar Patil for the respondent. Perused judgment of the Trial Court. The learned advocate for the respondent submitted that the vehicle of the Zilla Parishad was not involved in the accident. However, the judgment showed that not only Ambassador Car bearing No. MH 20 U 9510 was involved, but even its driver Vishnu Tatyarao Bhosale himself had taken the injured applicant to the hospital. Prima facie there appears to be material on record to show that the vehicle was involved. The original claim was by injured person for permanent disability. In view of 2 this only half of the amount is deposited. It is directed that said amount be paid to the applicant on applicant's furnishing security to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial) and on an undertaking to repay the same as and when directed by this Court. 2. The Civil Application stands disposed of. Date : 15.06.2009 [P.R. BORKAR,J.] snk/2009/JUN09/ca4356.09