an h , REPLY OF IrHE t d Anoter f k // H£GH CQURT OF JUDICATURE 1§T EILA8P'SR‘ CHHATT§$GARH SENG‘LE BENCH : HGN’BLE SHRE H.L. D TTU, CJ. CeMemnt Petition (S) No.4 of 2Gi35 Present: None appears for the appiicané. Shri Ashutosh Singh Kachhawaha, GA. for the Sfaée. ORAL QRHER gassed on maih March, 2am; This contempt petition arises out of an order passed by the State Adménistrat§ve Tribunai in O.A.No.54&3 of 399i} dated 6~3- 1996. By the said oa'der, the learned $ingi’e Bench of the Tn'ounai had directed the respondents to settie the ciaim of the appiicent within three weeks. Since the respondents have not compiied with the orders and directions issued by the Tribunai, the iearneoi Singie Bench referred the matter to the Division Bench of the Tribunai for initiating contempt proceedings against the respondents under Section t? of the Administrative Tribunat Act. The reterenoe was regtstered as M.A.No.124 of 1990 and on receipt of the same on transfer to this Court; it has been registered as contempt petition. (2} After service of notice, detaiied counter attidavidrepiy has been fiied. in the reply, the respondents have stated that they have compiied with the orders and directions issued by the $tate Administrative tribunal in O.A.No.546 of 1 9%. A¥3PLECANT KP. Mishra VERSU$ RESPawmENT The Secretary to Government MR, Housing & Enviomment @ (3) i have aiso gone through the repiy filed by the respondents. Since there is substantial compliance of the directions issued bv the Tribunai, in my opinion, the proceedings in this contempt petition need not be continued. Therefore, the contempt proceedings are dropped. Ordered accordingiy.