r ^ THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT APPEAL N0. ^SA OF 2011 APPELLANTS/ RESPONDENTS 1. Guru Ghasidas University Bilaspur through Registrar, , Bilaspur (Chhatti sgarh) € 2. Examination Con troller, Guru Ghasidas University Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) RESPONDENTS/ PETITIONERS VERSUS ^"'" ^-^- ^f^ / F?XW/. ^w' y /y.A°' .^ / ^'^'/ '^' '3^^. '-^feii€/" Manisha Gupta, D/o Shri Narayan PravSad Clu]:)t:a aged About, 19 years, student of B. Com Part-1, R/o RK Nagar, Tulsi Awas, Bilaspur (CG) ^r^ Apeksha Sharma, D/o Shri Kaml Kishore Sharnici., agcd 20 years, student of t3,Com Part-I, R/o RK Nagar, P.220 Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 3. Shalini Pandey, D/o Shri Prabhat Kuma.r Pandey, agcd about 19 years, stude.nt of B. Com Part-I, R/o RK Nagar, Near Telephone Excliange P. No. 24, EiSilaspur (CG) 4. Rameshrin Dhruw, D/o Sri Kartik Ram Dhruvv, aged about 19 years, student of B.Com.Part-I, R/o Kanchan Vihar, Bilaspur (CG) 5. Neha Vaishnav, D/o Shri Manharan, agect about about 19 years, student of B.Com. Part-I, C/o Shaskiya Mata Sabari Naveen Kanya Mahavidyalaya I3ilaspirr (CG) 6. Sapna Sharrna, D/o Shri B D Sharma, aged about 19 years, student of ];.i,.Com Part-I,R/oRK Nagsu-, Chandan Awas, P.No.2/87 Bi].aspur(CG) 7. Indu Mishra, D/o Charidra Shekar Mishra, aged about 20 years, student: of B.Com, Part-I, R/o Jorapara, t:3ilaspur 'f' ^^^ //::-y:'-""^-%'\ z'"-' /' "" "^ \\ /^.-' 10 -,. ^^ \^ ^ \ ,1 ,f^ i! ^ lo^'t ^~::<?%T^^/ 8. Aarti Somawar, D/o Shri Raju Somawar, aged about 20 years, student of B.Com Part-II, R/o New Sarlcanda Near Gudi Mai Mandir, Sanjay Pan Patace,Bi]aspur Dist. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 9 . Surekha Yadav, D/o Shri Mohanlal Yadav,agecl about 20 years, student of B.Com Part-II, R/o Sarkanda Bilaspur (Chhafctisgarh) 10. Sunita Patel, D/o Dujram Patel, aged about 20 years, student of B. Corn. Part-II, R/o Chingrajpara, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (CG) 11. Meena Kaushik^D/o Kamal Kaushik, aged about 20 yrs student of B. Corn. Part-II, R/o Basant Vihar, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (CG) 12. Munmun Soni,D/o AL Soni aged about 20 years, student of B. Com. Part-Il, R/ o Jorapara, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (CG) 13. Deepa Gandharva , D / o Kartik Ram Gandharva, aged about 20 years, student of B. Corn. Part-11, R/o Sarkanda,B:ilaspur(CG) 14. Jyoti Yadav, D/o Marakhan Lal Yadav, aged about 22 years, student of l3.Com. Part-III, R/o School (:;howk, Chingrajpara, Bilaspiir (CG) 15. Shyam Kumari Patel, D/o Bhuvneshwar Prasact I->atcl, agcd about 22 yrs, student of B.Com. Part-III, R/o Chilhati, Bilaspur (CG) 16. Smt.Manjari Shukla,Wife of AK Shukla, aged aboii.it 23 years, student of B.Corn. Part-IIl, R/o Panchaval.i Cly, R KNagar, Bilaspur (CG) i , -y^v^: 17. Mini Sahu, D/o Bholaram Sahu,aged about 22 years student of B.Com. Part-III, R/o Bharat Chowk, Chingrajpara, Bilaspi.lr (CG) 18. Uma Sahu, D/o Alakhram Sahu, aged about 22 years student of Ei.Com. Part-III, R/ o Laxmi C'howk, Chingrajpara, Bilaspirr (CG) 19. Saraswati Sahu, D/o Ram Kumar Sahu aged about 22 Years, student of 13.Com. Part-III,R/o Ganesh Cliowk, Chingrajpara^ Bilaspi.ir (CG) 20. Ishwari SahuJJ/o Rarnavtar Sahu, aged about 21 years student of B.Com. Part-III, R/ o Devnagar (E5 i r'kona) District Bilaspur (CG) 21. Lata Sahu, D/o DevnMrayan Sahu, aged abouL 2 1 years student of B.Com. Part.-I.Il, R/o Bahtarai Cl-iowk, Chingrajpara, Bilaspur (CG) 22. Rajeshwari Mishra, D/o Sri Devvrat Mishra, agecl about 21 years, student of B.Com. Part-III, R/o Suiya Chowk, Chingrajpara, Bilaspur (CG) 23. Shilu Paul, D/o Jeevcinram Sahu, aged about 2 1 years student of B.Com. l::>art-III, R/o Khandelwal Kliai (}odam, Seepat Road, Bilaspur (CG) 24. Vijya Tiwari,D/o Shri Kalika Prasad Tiwari,aged about. 21 Years, student of I3.Com. Part-III, R/o Muktidharn Chowk, new Sarlcanda, Bilaspur (Chhtisi;>;garh) 25. State of Chhafctiisgarh Through the Sec'retary, Higher PxlLication Department, Man l:ralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bltiawan, Raipur (C h ha t (:: i sgarh) /^1 t_ 26. Shaskiya Mata Sat3ari Naveen Kanya Maha.vidyalaya, Though Principal, Seepat Road, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 27. Smt. Sunanda Maravi, Assistant Lecturer (Hindi Subject)Shaskiya Mafca Sabari Naveen Kanya Mahavidyalaya, Through Principal, Seepat Road, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) WRIT APPEAL UNDER SECTION ^__^1L—OF CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT APPEAL TO DIVISION BENCH ACT, 2006 READ WITH RULEJL58J10)_OF CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT RULES^007. HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH^MLASPUR DB: HON*BLB I.M. QUDDUSI & HON*BLB G. MINHAJUDDIN, JJ, W.A.No.421/2011 Vs. RBSPONDENTS Lata Yadav aad others ItSWWIN^: l^ W.A.No.468/2011 Vs. W.A. No.449/2011 Vs. W.A.No.433/2011 Vs. WRIT APPEALS UNDER SECTION 2(11 OF THE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT (APPBAL TO DIVISIQN BBNCHI ACT. 2006 RBAD WITH RULE 158 110) OF CHHATTISGARH HIGH CQURT RULBS. 2007 APPELLANTS Gum Ghasidas Universityand anofher APPELLAS9TB Gum Ghasidas Universilyand aiiother RE8PONDBNT8 Renu Jaiswal and ofhiers APPBLLANTS Gum Ghasidas Universityaad aaother RESPONDBNTS Maya Dubey aad ofhers APPBLLANTS Guru Ghasidas Universityand another RESPONDBNTS Maaisha Gupta aad othera^ APPEARANCB: Mr. Ashish Shrivastava aiid Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, counsel for fhe appeUaats ia all fhe writ appeals. Mr. V.C. Ottalwar counsel for respondents 1 to 34 in W.A.421/2011, respondents 1 to 27 m W.A.468/2011, respondents 1 to 60 m W.A. 449/2011 and rcspondents 1 to 24 inW.A. 453/2011 Mr, Viaay Hadt, Deputy Advocate General for fhe State/ respondent no.35 ia W.A, 421/2011, respondent no,28 ia W.A.468/2011, respondent No.61 in W.A.449/2011 and respondent no.25 inW.A. 453/2011. Mr, P.S. Koshy, appears on behalf of Sunaada Maravi/ Respondent no.37 in W.A.421/2011, rcspondent no.30 in W.A.468/2011, Respondent no.63 in W.A.449/2011 & Respondent no.27 m W.A.453/1 1. Per I.M. OUDDUSI. J. ORALORDER (18.11.2011) 1. The above writ appeals have been filed agamst fhe common impugned order dated 08,08.2011 passed by fhe leamed Siagle Judge in W.P(C).Nos.l581, 1626, 1673 and 1580 of 2011 aUowiag the writ petitions, The learaed siagle Judge has held fhat the petitioners satisfied fhe basic requirements of attendaace; fhus tiiey shaU be treated as regular students for fhe examination wherein they had already appeared and fhe result of fhe said exainiaation shall be declared forthwith within a period ofone week fi-om today so fhat fhe petitioners could not be deprived ofadniission to furfher higher courses. 2. W.A. No.421/2011 rclates to W.P(C ).No.l581/2011 (Lata Yadav and others -vs- State); W.A.468/11 relates to W.P.(C ). 1626/11 (Renu Jaiswal and others -vs- State); W.A. 449/11 relates to W.P (C). 1673/2011 (Maya Dubey and others Vs. State) and W.A. 453/11 relates to W.P (C ). 1580/11 (Mamsh Oupta and others Vs. State). Siace fhese appeals iavolve smular facts and question of law, fhey are being disposed of by fhis coinnion order. 3. AppUcation has beeu filed ia each writ appeal on behalf of fhe respondent-stadents who were petitioners iii fhe writ petitions prayiag that the appeUaats/Universily herem.be directed to declare thej4? results of fheir respective courses ie,, B.A,, /B.Com., /B.C.A., (Part-I, Part-II aad Part-III) in the interest of justice, However, ia Paragraph 2 offhe application it has been prayed for a direction to the appeUaat University to declare ttie results of fhe respondent students tareatirtg fhein as private studeuts as fhey had appeared for fhe fiinal exaoiiaation of said courses held ia acadenuc session 2010-2011, 4. In view of tkie above, learaed counsel for the appeUants has submitted that fhe writ appeUants have no objectiou to declare the result of fhe respondents as private students. 5. Siace therc is no objection on tiie side of fhe writ appeUants, we dispose of all fhe four writ appeals with a direction fhat the results of the respondent-stadents shaU be declared treatiag fhenx as private students, 6« The ixnpugned order dated 08,08.2011 passed by the learaed siagle judge shall staad modi&ed to fhe above exte^t^ Sd/- I.M. Quddusi Judge Sd/- G. Minhajuddin Judge Rao ^