1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Civil Application (CAZ) No. 197 of 2010 in L. P .A. (St.) No. 3327/2010 in C.A. No. 1838/2009 in W. P. No. 761/2008 (D) Raje Dharmarao Shikshan Mandal and another ...VERSUS.. Vijay @ Vinod Motiramji Bodakhe and others =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==- Mr. V.D.Awachat, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. P.B.Patil, Advocate for Respondent No.1 C ORAM : D.B.BHOSALE ; and PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATED : 01st July, 2010. 1] Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2] By this Civil Application, the applicants/ appellants have prayed for condonation of delay of 49 days in filing Letters Patent Appeal. The appeal is directed against the order dated 30/11/2009 passed by the learned Single Judge in Civil Application No. 1838/2009 in Writ Petition No. 761/2008. By the impugned order, the learned Single Judge has directed the appellants to reinstate respondent no.1 back in service with continuity and 40% back wages. Mr. Abhay Sambre, learned counsel for the applicants/appellants submits that when the civil application was heard and disposed of finally, the fact that the school was already de-recognized and it was closed, was not brought to the notice of the learned Single Judge and hence, 2 the appellants have filed the present appeal. 3] At this stage, we would not like to consider the merits of the matter. However, for the reasons stated in the application, we are inclined to allow this civil application for condonation of delay, subject to payment of costs of Rs.1,500/- to respondent no.1 within a period of two weeks from today. Order accordingly. Civil Application is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Diwale