"'.' ;. ' ^ ^ F^Ct^J ^)^ HIOH COURT OFCHHAmSGARH: BILASPUR 'rliii SingleBench: Appellants Respondents Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. F.A.M IPR\ No.354 of2007 1. Puranchand Agrawal, S/o Late Mohanlal Bagadjya, aged about 65 years : 2. Tarachand, S/o. Late Mohanlal Bagadiya, aged about 70 years 3. Puranchand Agrawal, S/o Mohanlal Bagadiya, agedabout65 years , Appellant No.1 to 3 are R/o Akaltara, Tahsil-Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa (CG) ! 4. Naresh, S/o Sitaram Bagadiya, aged about 52years Suresh, S/o Sitaram Bagadiya, aged about 5. 50 years 6. Umesh, S/o Sitaram Bagadiya, aged about :48years, i 7. Dinesh, Sitaram Bagadiya, sged about 46 years, I • v 8. Gayatri, Wd/o Sitaram Bagadiya, aged about 72 years. AppetlarttNo.4 to 8 are R/o Torwa Naka, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (CG) Versus 1. Stateof Chhattisgarh, Through the Collector, Distriot Janjgir Champa(CG) 2. Land Acguisition Officer, Hasdeo Bango Project, Distriot Janjgir-Champa (CG) FA(M) uhder Section 54 of the LancLAcgyisition^rt^^^ Present: Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, couhsel for the appellant/s. Shri P.R. Patankar, PL forState. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 06.08.2008) Leamedcounselfortheappettantssubmittedthattheappellantshave no grievance against the quantum of compensation awarded by the learned Additionaf District Judge, Janjgir-Champa inM.J.C.No.14/2006. Leameci counsel for the appellants urged that white passing the impugned order, the iearned Additionat District has not awarded any compensation from the date of publication of notification under Section 4 (1) ofthe Land Acquisition Act, 1894. (2) In this view ofthe matter, learnedcounsel forthe appeliants sought permission of this Court to withdraw this.appeal with liberty to file an appljcatjon for review before the learned Additional District Jydge, Janjgir. ^y^ ' 5 Priya Champa for awarding interest from the date of publication of notification. under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 * (3) Accordingty, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The appellants/plaintiffs are at liberty to avail the remedy as prayed for, if avaitabte underthe law. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge ^ M 6