IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15648 of 2011 1. DILWASO DEVI 2. JITAN SINGH @ JAGJITAN SINGH 3. NIRAJ KUMAR SINGH @ NIRAJ KUMAR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. ASHOK KUMAR ----------- 2 19.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 406, 504, 506, 500/34 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The accusation against the petitioners is that the marriage of the son of the petitioner was fixed with the daughter of the informant for which the engagement was performed, but ultimately, the marriage was not finally performed. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that since, the marriage could not finally performed, hence, all the articles of the informants' side were returned. The petitioner is ready to deposit Rs. 25,000/- before the learned court below which will be 2 invested in some fix deposit schemes which will be subject to the result of the case. Considering the nature of accusation, let the above named petitioners, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 68/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)