1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. WRIT PETITION NO. 858 OF 2011 Abdul Wahab Ansari ... Petitioner v/s Union of India & ors. ... Respondents Mr.B.B.Parikh for the petitioner. Mr.R.A.Rodrigues with Mr.Som Sinha for Resp.Nos.1 and 2. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DATED: 18TH AUGUST, 2011 P.C.: 1. Admittedly, the petitioner has retired from the Central Government service and, therefore, the challenge raised in this petition to the departmental enquiry initiated against him must be, at the first instance, raised before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, as per the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of L.Chandra Kumar v/s Union of India & ors., reported in A.I.R. 1997 SC 1125. 2. Hence, the petition is disposed with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal. (SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.) 2 3