mm 226 of the Constitution of India Writ Petition under Article S B Hon’ble Shri Dhirendr Mishra, 07. 1 1.2008 Mr SOmkant Verma, PA B‘narl Liri M1 ensel for the petitioner. ‘ PL for a c , mmawrfm WWI‘?%Q?W #Wm PETITIONER Sudhman ‘Nagesiya, S/o Shri Akbar Nagesiya, aged abOut 54 yearS, R/o Village Tut To]i Chhotemundpar, Post Gholeng Tahsil Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (CG) Versus ’ RESPONDENTS 1. State of Cthhattisgarh, Through the Secretaly, Department of Public Woks, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, .Raipur (CG) 2. Chief Executive Engineer, Department of Public Works, Division Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur 1CG) 3. Sub Divisional ' Officer, Public Works Department, NH. Sub Division Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (CG) EW.WW.W am m “W same as to that of in Govind i {2007 12) CGLJ 29}, Wherai gangmen are entitled to, be i years, in accordance with t} Shaskiya Sevak‘ (Adhivarshiki— Learned counsel appe further submits that if the ca ftgtingstthere is no reascn tc ' the permanent gangnen. Accordingly, this writ 1: order passed in the case of G verification of the fact as to V the Status of permanent gangt ‘a others Vs. State of CG & others n it is held that the permanent 'etired on attaining the age of 62 1e provisions of the Chhattisgarh Ayn) Adhiniyam , 1967. axing for the respondents/State se of the petitioner is on the same deny him the benefits available to etition is allowed in terms of the ovind '8a others (supra); subject to 'hether the petitioner has acquired Lian. No order as to costs a ’ t ;f” We I mm mm Mates Mmmm 7/ mwawm s aifrvmm , counsel appearing for the respondents/State jointly submit that the question of law, involved in the present writ petition, is the