1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.13 of 2008. [Shri Rajesh S/o Dokawdi Yadav & one] Vs. [Shri Motiram Damdu] ---------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances,Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri Suresh Dhole, Advocate for the petitioner. Coram: A. H. JOSHI, J. Dated: 15th January 2008. 1. The petitioner is raising as grounds for review the points namely: (i) Can the alleged eviction with house breaking be accepted without supporting police complaint against the applicant. (ii) Is the mere say of the respondent of forcible eviction, without corroborating evidence be accepted as Gospel truth by the trial Court. (iii) Why the complainant son of the respondent was not made co-plaintiff 2 who was in actual possession of suit premises. 2. These points were already urged and were not accepted by the Court. The grounds raised do not constitute grounds for review. 3. No interference is called for. 4. Review application is dismissed. JUDGE Sbm