IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF APRIL, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.19958 of 2007 Between: Dr. Chalasani Venkatadri & others. … Petitioners AND The Director General of Police, A.P., Hyderabad & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : Sri Venkatesh Varanasi for Sri V. Ravi Kiran. This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.19958 of 2007 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, order or direction preferably a Writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents more particularly the 3rd respondent not to interfere with the peaceful possession, enjoyment and construction activity of the petitioners in respect of the property bearing Municipal No. 8-2- 293/82/J-311/480 admeasuring 618 sq. Yards, Plot No. 480-111 in Sy.Nos.120 and 403/1 of Shaikpet Village and Sy. No. 102/1 of Hakimpet Village, Road No. 86, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad which is the subject matter of the suit i.e. OS No. 699 of 2007 (new) (O.S.NO. 1496 of 2005) and which is pending on the file of XV Junior Civil Judge City Civil Court, Hyderabad by duly declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in interfering with the civil dispute at the instance of the 4th Respondent which is the subject matter of the suit i.e. OS No. 699 of 2007 (new) (O.S. No. 1496 of 2005) and in which interim order has been granted by the learned XV Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in favour of the petitioners and against the 4th Respondent and also the inaction on the part of the Respondents 1 and 2 even after filing representation of them on 8-9-2007 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the well settled principles of law and pass such further or other orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” At the hearing, Sri Venkatesh Varanasi representing Sri V. Ravi Kiran Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that after filing of this writ petition respondent No.3 is not interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioners and respondent No.4. In view of this submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous with liberty to the petitioners to avail their remedy, in the event the police interfere with such civil disputes in future. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.25736 of 2007 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is also dismissed. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 19.04.2008 ES