IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9360 of 2011 HEMANT YADAV @ HEMANDAR KUMAR YADAV SON OF LATE BACHCHA LAL YADAV. -------------- PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 25.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It is alleged that the cash and jewelry was robbed from the house of the informant. It is further submitted that the petitioner is the co-villager of the informant and has not been named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner sprang up on the confessional statement of Md. Usman. Petitioner is the government servant and has no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that no recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, 2 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 69/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The bail bond of the petitioner will be provisionally accepted and on verification of the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, when it is found that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, the bail bond of the petitioner will be finally accepted. The petitioner will file an affidavit before learned court below that he will co-operate in the investigation as and when required. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)