IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 7147 of 2011 Date of decision: November 22, 2011 Vijay Kumar and others .. Petitioners Vs. Mangat Ram .. Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. S.K. Singla, Advocate for the petitioners. A.N. Jindal, J (Oral) The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 26.9.2011 passed by the trial court. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that Mr. Vinay Kashyap, Advocate, could not appear in the court as he was busy in arguing 10 yeas old appeal. The impugned order reveals that Mangat Ram and Vinod Kumar who were present since morning and had tendered their examination in chief by way of affidavit were returned without cross examination. Under the circumstances, the instant petition is allowed, impugned order is set aside and the plaintiff is directed to produce Mangat Ram and Vinod Kumar witnesses in the court for cross examination on the next date of hearing subject to payment of `2000/- as costs. It has been brought to my notice that tomorrow i.e. 23.11.2011 is the next date fixed before the trial court, as such, the plaintiff is directed to produce the aforesaid witnesses for cross examination on the next date i.e. succeeding 23.11.2011. This petition is allowed without issuing notice to the respondent with a view to impart complete justice to the parties and to save the huge expenses, which may be incurred by the respondent as also in order to avoid unnecessary delay in adjudication of the matter. Still, if dissatisfied, the respondent may move to this court for recalling this order. November 22, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge