C-78 *11*101 ^<TT^ ^3w^'-<<i<iio<i,y>Tnwin<?^R»m3<( ^^ ^.^^?. .^.9:. .6 .-?. %.T9.. 3TT^$TcpTRrll<h ^n3TT^$Ta?Htcy) 3TT^?T q^F(<jc|Ij6|c£{) Wt200% ?^n^^rf^T3n^9T PETITIONER Raglr^bti' Siiigh Thalcu.i\ S/o Late Gaiipat Sia.gh ThcA:iJ|i\ Agcd aboiit 45 ycai-s, R/o Housc No.A- 17, I^adhaswariii Nagai^ Raipur, PS Puraai Basti. rTah.. & Distt. Raiuur CCG1 Versus RBSPONDENTS 1. Distt. 3, Directoj Raipurj Writ Petltiou undCT Artil State c|f Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Honic pcpailnicnt, DKS Bhawan, Maiitralaya, Raipm'l(CO) 2. Directo^ Inspector General of PoUce (Admmlstrative) PoUce Head Quart.er, Raipur, K|aipur (CG) General of PoUce, PoMce Head Quarter, Distt. Raipur (CG) ifcle 226 of the Constitution of ladia (Admniistrat S.B Hon'ble Shri Dhireadr^ 17.11.2008 Shri Jitendra Gupta, co| Smt, Smita Ghai, PL foi| rotilid Tliis is the second No.6036 of 2007 agaiast the was disBiissed by this Gourt Ubert;/ to the petitioner to authority for rcdressal of his decide th.e representation of tlie eartiest. Leamed counsel for f aforesaid dii'ection, represeni petitioner on 5.11.2007, has consideration period. chl4fc641^^1^<^T^rfe1:^<<f^l^i'< ^3?f^T3TT^?T J. unsel for the petitioiier. tlie State. of litigation. Earlier Writ Petition (S) inipugued order dated 9th March, 2006 t/-ide order dated 10th October, 2007 with represeiitation before tlie coiicemed grievances, who was further directed to |iie petitioner in accordauce with law at ]ie petitioner suljmite that despite the l|ation of Anuexure P/8 preferred by fhe not been deiced eveH affcer lapse of a C-78 *11*101 ^*TT^ ^ET'-«l««?i*l,u>TH1<l<l^Roi'<-l^ ri«^A.&.?...^.^......6.s.%.^. 3n^?T q^f) (^clljelce;) WFt 200 % 3TT^^TcynR^ ^H 3ff^^TjCTTcp (<f ?^T^R ^rf^T 3TT^$T ^- Leamed counsel for the| files a fi-esh representatiou be^ his grievances, the same sha|ll accordance with law withui a| receipt ofthe K'presentation. In view of al^ove s'ull respective pailies, 'tlie uistaiit. petitioner to file a fresli rep;|; withui a period of two weeks as well as tlie order dated 101 •On.such representatiou beiiig| decided- on its own iiierits iij| period of tliree weeks from thej <pi<iio<nTi4ii+ic^T^?f^St <R|^|<< ^3Tf^T3n^$T State submits that iii case Uie petitioner bre the respoudent No. 2 for redressal of be considered aiid decided by htm in period of tlirce weeks from tlie date of ^missions of leained couiisel for the petitioii is disposed ofwith Kbeity to the :escntation before tae respondent No,2 6-om today along with copy of Uiis order ,10.2007 passed iii W.P.(s) No.6036/07. aiade, 'the same shall be considercd and accopiajicc wi.th law, witliiii ,a farther date of receipt of 'tlie rcpresen'tation. Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge