IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 19TH JUNE 2007 / 29TH JYAISHTA 1929 WP(C).No. 13753 of 2007(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ THE WIRECUT BRICKS MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION, CHENGANNUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT M.K.VIJAYAN, KUTTARPEROOR P.O., MANNAR, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.J.DEVADANAM SRI.PRAMOD J.DEV SRI.VINOD J.DEV RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, STATE SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHENGANNUR. 4. THE JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, CHENGANNUR. 5. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHENGANNUR. 6. THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, DISTRICT OFFICE, VELLAKKINAR P.O., ALAPPUZHA. BY G.P. SHRI.I.V.PRAMOD. SHRI.CHANDRA MOHANDAS, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================================= W.P.(C).No.13753 of 2007 ================================== Dated this the 19th day of June, 2007 J U D G M E N T The petitioner claims to be an association of wirecut bricks manufacturers. The petitioner has approached this court seeking the following reliefs: “i) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents not to interfere with or obstruct of carrying of mud as per law for the purpose of manufacturing wirecut bricks ii) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order of direction, directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P6 representation.” 2. I am of opinion that such general directions cannot be issued, that too, at the instance of an association when none of its members are on record. In the above circumstances, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition and accordingly the same is dismissed. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge. 2