IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 13201 of 2009 Between: Smt.C.Parwathamma W/o.Venkatesh R/o.H.No.9-4-30/A/183, Bhagat Singh Nagar, Jubili Hills, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Hyderabad District, Nampally Station Road, Hyderabad. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Hyderabad. 3 The Tahsildar, Shaikpet Mandal, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents without following due process of law, without canceling patta and without initiating eviction proceedings trying to dispossess the petitioner from No.9-4-30/A/183, an extent of 30 sq. Yards, situated at Bhagat Singh Nagar, Jubilee Hills, Shaikpet Mandal, Hyderabad, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and to pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: The petitioner had earlier filed W.P.No. 3479 of 2009 alleging unlawful conduct by the respondents therein including the respondents 1 and 3 herein in interfering with the petitioner’s possession of an extent of 0.30 sq. yards in S.No. 102/1 of Hakeempet village, which was assigned to her under a Patta in 1995. By the Judgment dt. 13.3.2009, the writ petition was disposed of directing the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner’s possession unless and until his patta is cancelled following the due process of law. In this writ petition, the petitioner alleges that after she has constructed a residential house in the plot in question about 20 days back, the subordinates of the respondents came on to the property on 1.7.2009 and demanded the petitioner to vacate her property within two days otherwise they would demolish the house and throw the articles on the road. According to the petitioner, when she showed them a copy of the Judgement in W.P.No. 3479 of 2009, the respondents stated that the court order pertains to the hut but not to the recently constructed room. In the circumstances, the petitioner is before this court. If what the petitioner states is true, the conduct of the respondents would amount to contumacious disregard of the order of this Court dt 13.3.2009 in W.P.No. 3479 of 2009. The appropriate remedy for the petitioner in the circumstances is to file a contempt case against the conduct of the respondents and not by way of another writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the appropriate remedy including for contempt. No order as to costs. _____________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J 3.7.2009. KRB. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION No. 13201 of 2009 Dated: 3.7.2009.