1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Wri t Petition No.2998/2008 Ku. Seema d/o Motiram Kshirsagar Vs. The Chief Executive Oflficer, Z.P. and another. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Mr. V.G. Bhamburkar, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr. Bhuibhar, Adv. for the respondent no.2. Coram : B.H. Marlapalle and A.H. Joshi, JJ. Dated : 2nd December, 2008. Heard Mr. Bhamburkar, the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner was appointed as Anganwadi Madatnis at Wadgaon, as per the order dated 31.10.2006 and the said order came to be cancelled by the impugned order dated 26.3.2007. Hence, this petition. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Zilla Parishad has placed before us the original file and we have noted from the same that an organization called “Janahit Sangharsh Samiti” submitted a complaint dated 17.1.2007 to the the respondent-the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad 2 pointing out that some of the appointees to the post of Angawadi Sewak and Angawadi Madatnis were not residence of the concerned villages and, therefore, they had obtained appointments by submitting false information regarding their residence as well as experience. The Chief Executive Officer ordered an inquiry and Mrs. Joshi, the Supervisor, under the respondent no.2 conducted an inquiry. The petitioner was issued notice in the said inquiry. She appeared before the Inquiry Officer. The report of Mrs. Joshi dated 9.3.2007 is on record and it states that when the petitioner was called upon to submit the votors' list of Wadgaon vaillge, she stated that in the votors' list the said village does not find place and, therefore, she could not submit the said document. The learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon the ration card issued in the name of the petitioner's husband. We have noted that ration card was issued on 10.2.2007 i.e. after the complaint received by the Zilla Parishad. The proclamation issued and published in the local newspaper on 23.5.2006 sets out the terms and conditions for eligibility to apply for the post of Anganwadi Sewika and Anganwadi Madatnis and the first condition is about the residence. The candidate 3 has to be undoubtedly the residence of the village where the appointment has sought to be made. It is, therefore, clear that the petitioner was not eligible and the impugned order has been issued on the basis of the inquiry report submitted by the Supervisor under the respondent no.2. We also need to note that the Anganwadi Sewika or Anganwadi Madatnis is not a regular employee of the Zilla Parishad. All these posts are on fixed honorarium. There is a very limited scope of inquiry in the impugned order and, therefore, having regard to the report placed before us, we are satisfied that the action taken by the Zilla Parishad cannot be termed as perverse or erroneous. The petition is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE Ambulkar.