Crl.M.No.M 3832 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M 3832 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 25, 2010 Sunit Kumar Joshi and another .....Petitioners v. State of Haryana ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Shailender Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Rajinder Singh Arya, DAG, Haryana. Mr.Parvesh Saini, Advocate for the complainant. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in FIR No.33, dated 26.1.2010, registered under Sections 323/506/34 IPC, at Police Station Sector 5, Panchkula. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully. This Court while issuing notice of motion on 9.2.2010, passed the following order: “ Argues that offence under Section 323 IPC is a bailable one and that only non bailable offence is 506 IPC. Further argues that there is old enmity between the petitioners and complainant being neighbours. Notice of motion for 25.3.2010. Mr.Parvesh Saini, Advocate, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the complainant. However, petitioners are directed to join the investigation Crl.M.No.M 3832 of 2010 (O&M) -2- and in case they are arrested, they shall be released on interim bail by the Arresting Officer to his satisfaction subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. .” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that pursuant to the said order, the petitioners have already joined the investigation. It has been stated by learned State counsel as well that the petitioners have joined the investigation and that they are no more required for any custodial interrogation by the police. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioners are likely to abscond or that they are likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. In view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, order dated 9.2.2010, granting interim bail to petitioners- Sunit Kumar Joshi and Nidhi, is, hereby confirmed subject to the compliance of conditions contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. 25.3.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge