hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 990 OF 2009 S.M. Karandikar .... Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra ... Respondents Mr. R.V. Govilkar and Ms. Anita Rai i/hy Mayur Narenedra & Co. for Petitioner. Mrs. Anjali Helekar, A.G.P. For R. Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Sheeraz Rustomjee i/by Leena Adhvaryu for the Applicant/Intervener. Ms. Rupali Pawar i/by M/s. Law Point for R. NO. 6. Mr. S.P. Bharti for for R. No. 9. Mr. Roshan D’zouza i/by Mr. Umesh Shetty for R. No. 3. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 12, 2010 P.C. On behalf of the State Government, communication dated 3.7.2009 is shown whereby the Petitioners were informed of rejection of the application for renewal. Copy of this communication is taken on record. On behalf of the Petitioner the learned counsel submits that they have not received the said order. At any rate, considering the decision of the State Government, in our opinion, nothing survives in this petition. If the Petitioner is entitled to challenge the order of rejection, he may do so independently and disposal of this petition will not stand in his way. In the event the petitioners are entitled to challenge the floating of the tender, then dismissal of this petition will not stand in his way. (J.H. BHATIA,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)