IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 1071 of 2011. Date of Decision: 26.4.2011 *** Surjit Ram .. Petitioner VS. Harbans Lal .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR, Present:- Mr. Anjali Khosla, Advocate and Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. The petitioner-defendant has been restrained by both the Courts below not to carry on the profession of “Hadda Rori”(a traditional terms wherein the dead animals are collected and their various body parts are separated), within the vicinity where the parties to the suit are residing, during the pendency of the suit. Heard. The petitioner is undisputedly involved in the aforesaid business of skinning the dead animals. Though he claimed that his premises are situated away from the house of the plaintiff, but it is very obvious that during storage of bodies of dead animals and separation of various parts, foul smell is omitted and environment is polluted, for this reason proceedings under Section 133 Cr.P.C. were initiated against the petitioner. Finding that the petitioner is causing nuisance to the inhabitants of the area and endangering their lives, both the Courts below rightly restrained him from doing so during the pendency of the suit. Dismissed. (ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE April 26,2011 Jiten