IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.5949 of 2000 Between: M.B. Reddy S/o. Late M. Penta Reddy, R/o. Medak ... PETITIONER AND 1 The A.P.State Road Transport Cropn; Rep. by Managing Director, Musheerabad Hyderabad 2 The Regional Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C. Medak Region, Sangareddy 3 The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C. Bus Depot, Narayankhed, Medak District 4 The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C.Bus Depot, Medak, Medak District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ or direction particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS and declaring regularising the petitioner services only w.e.f. 31-7-1995 instead of regularising the services of the petitioner form the month of March, 1993 i.e., the date on which he completes 240 days of services vide Procgs.No.P1/255(1)/96-KND, dated:25-1-1996 as arbitrary, and discriminatory and unjust and consequently direct the Respondents to regularise his services from the date on which he completes 40 days of services from the date of his initial appointment along with the consequential benefits following out of such regularisation in the interest of justice and fair play. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. V. Narasimha Goud Counsel for the Respondents: Smt. B. G. Uma Devi The Court made the following Order: When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, it is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the parties that in view of the order dated 19-08-2000, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is closed. _____________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J. February 16, 2009 MRR