IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 7455 of 2010 Decided on: 29.11.2010 Sat Parkash …..Petitioner. Versus The State of H.P. and ors ………Respondents. Coram : The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge For the petitioner: Mr. Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. for respondents No. 1 to 4. __________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral): The petitioner is aggrieved by Annexure P-1, whereby he has been directed to work in G.P.S. Sajwad. The petitioner is presently working in G.P.S. Chipni-2. According to the petitioner, G.P.S. Sajwad is about 40 kms away from his present place of posting. It is also submitted that though expression ‘deputation’ is used in the impugned order, but no deputation allowance is granted to him. According to the petitioner, this situation arose, when 5th respondent, who is Vidya Upasak teacher, was adjusted in another school, but this adjustment is impermissible since Vidya Upasak teacher can work only in the school, where she is engaged. Another contention is that there are surplus teachers in the Govt. Schools around Sajwad and no such teacher is adjusted on rationalization. There will be a direction to 3rd respondent to look 2 into all these grievances of the petitioner and take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner immediately. In case, the petitioner has not been relieved as on today, further proceedings in that regard will be deferred till such time. 3. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s) if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice (Justice V.K. Ahuja), November 29, 2010 Judge (tilak/pankaj)