1 wp11371-10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of | coram, appearance, court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders | WRIT PETITION NO.11371/2010. Hari Om Sevabhavi Sanstha,Kosmet Vs The State of Maha. & Anr. .... Shri V.A.Dhakne,Adv.for petr. Shri V.D.Godbharle,AGP for R.1 & 2. .... CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE & A.V.NIRGUDE,JJ. DATE : 16/03/2011. 1] Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2] In this Writ Petition, the petitioner has made the following prayer : B] To direct the respondents to grant permission to transfer and migrate any one aided closed hostel from Sangli district to the petitioner sanstha to run the same at Kosmet, Tq. Kinwat, Dist.Nanded, by issuing a writ of mandamus or any other 2 wp11371-10 appropriate writ, order to direction, as the case may be. 3] Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that their proposal for similar prayer is pending with respondent no.1. He submits that they had submitted proposal to the District Social Welfare Officer, who in turn forwarded it to respondent no.1. According to the petitioner, respondent no.2 has forwarded the proposal to respondent no.1 with his comments and the proposal is now pending before respondent no.1. 4] Learned A.G.P. is not in a position to make any statement in response to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. Petitioner in paragraph no.6 of the Writ Petition made reference to their proposal. Having regard to overall facts and circumstances of the case, we are satisfied that this Petition can be conveniently disposed of by the following order : a] The respondents shall consider the proposal of the petitioner seeking transfer of any aided closed hostel from Sangli district, 3 wp11371-10 to petitioner s institution, to run the same at Kosmet, Tq. Kinwat, Dist.Nanded, expeditiously. While passing this order, we shall not be understood to have issued any direction to the Government in respect of the demands made by the petitioner. Respondent No.1 to decide the proposal of the petitioner on merits in accordance with law. With these observations, the petition is disposed of. (A.V.NIRGUDE,J.) (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) umg/wp11371-10