IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2951 OF 2010 M/s.Shalimar Wire Industries Ltd. and others. ... Petitioners. V/s. Union of India and others. ... Respondents. N.S.Thakkar i/b. M.R.Baya for the petitioners. A.S.Rao for the respondents. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATED : 11th June 2010. P.C. : This petition was filed in the month of April, 2010. Thereafter, from time to time this petition came up for hearing on more than 5 to 6 dates. Today, when this matter was called out for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners prayed that this petition should be heard after four weeks. We do not find any reason to grant this prayer. Prayer made is thus rejected. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents. Perused petition. 3. By the impugned order, the Tribunal refused to condone delay of about 418 days in filing appeal, for the reasons recorded in the order. 4. We were taken through the impugned order. In para-4 of the order, the Tribunal has given reasons for refusing to condone delay. Having examined the same, we do not find any perversity in the approach adopted by the Tribunal. The view taken is a reasonable and possible view. The delay in filing appeal has not been explained. No sufficient cause for condonation of delay is made out. We concur with the reasons given by the Tribunal. 5. In the result, petition is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (V.C.DAGA J.)