IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. (T) No. 12795 of 2008. Decided on 23.02.2011. _____________________________________________________ Om Parkash. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner has assailed the office order dated 01.10.2005 (Annexure A-2). He was paid deputation allowance, however, the same was being directed to be recovered vide Annexure A-2, dated 01.10.2005. It is admitted case of the parties that the petitioner was not heard before the issuance of Annexure A-2, dated 01.10.2005. He has been visited with civil and evil consequences. Consequently, the office order dated 01.10.2005 (Annexure A-2) is quashed and set aside. However, liberty is reserved to the respondents to proceed in the matter in accordance with law. 2. With these observations, the petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge February 23, 2011. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.