w ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (C) . No. ?^^ /2011 PETITONER RESPONDNETS ..i#'xv1r^'\ 'i ^ r^-€<3^W"' .*•*' -N/.*'*'A V^.*'' / VERSUS 01.^ 02. 03." Ram Das S/o- Akalu Ram, aged about 28 years, R/o- Village- Champapur, Post- Lurgikalan, P.5.- Chalgali, Tahsil- Balrampur, District- Surguja (C.G.) The Chairman, Chhattisgarh State Schedule Caste Commission Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) Collector, District- Surguja (C.G.) Station House Officer, P.5.- Chalgali, Distrid- Surguja (C.G.) The Tahsildar, Tahsil- Balrampur, District- Surguja (C.G.) Indradeo Yadav S/o- Jatu Yadav, R/o- Village- Champapur, Post- Lurgikalan, P.S.- Ghalgali, Tahsil- Balrampur, District- Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ^' 04. ^ 05. •;r::"l ^•f HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION (0 N0.3783_QF 201 1 Ram Das Versus The Chairman, Chhattisgarh State Schedule Caste Commission, Raipur & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Singie Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri F.S. Khare, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate forthe State. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 29th day of July, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse under the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, ifso advised. 2. No objection from other side. 3. It is ordered, as prayed for. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 'ZZ1 •^ poown Satish K. Agnihotri Judge v^""'"