IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16568 of 2008 MANGAL SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 15-05-2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Submission is that the petitioner is neither named in the F.I.R. nor any recovery has been made from his possession. He has also not been put on Test Identification Parade. Further submission is that the name of the petitioner appeared in the confessional statement of co-accused Tiklis. Learned counsel pointed that save and except the said confessional statement of Tiklis there is nothing more against the petitioner who is in custody since 14.12.2007. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, namely, Mangal Sah is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Madhubani Nagar (Rahika) P.S. Case No. 132 of 2007. S.Sb/- (Madhavendra Saran, J.)