1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail Appli. No.6206/2007 (Raghuraj Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : March 05, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Manish Dadhich, for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, P.P. for the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that injuries are simple in nature. Be that as it may, there are serious allegations against the present petitioner and other co-accused that they have forcibly taken the vehicle, which was seized by the Government Authorities; committed theft; assaulted the public servant and deterred them from discharging the public duty. In the circumstances, therefore, in my view, in such matters, custodial interrogation is necessary. No case for anticipatory bail is made out. The bail application filed by the petitioner under section 438 Cr.P.C. is, therefore, dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-