IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.19601 of 2011 Date of Decision: 31.10.2011 Sunita ..... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present: Mr. Balraj Gujjar, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, ACJ. 1. The instant petition has been filed in the public interest. Although in various paras the petitioner has shown that her husband had applied for a plot under the EWS category and she claimed, being successor, entitlement to the allotment of the plot. 2. It is purely private interest litigation. The petitioner is at liberty to file an appropriate writ petition without styling the same as a public interest litigation. 3. The present writ petition is dismissed in the aforesaid terms with liberty as stated above. (M.M. KUMAR) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (RAJIV NARAIN RAINA) JUDGE 31.10.2011 manju