IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1056 of 2011 Between: Ch.V.Chennaiah & others. ..... Petitioners AND Special Grade Deputy Collector & Executive Officer, Sri Bramaramba Mallikarjuna Swamy Varla Devasthanam, Srisailam, Kurnool District & others. .....Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri Lakshmi Nrayana Reddy Counsel for respondent No.1: Sri V.T.M. Prasad Counsel for respondents 2-4: Sri V. Venugopala Rao The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1056 of 2011 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction by declaring the short tender notice issued by respondent No.1 vide Rc.No.E1/01/2010 dated 13.01.2011 in respect of works shown under item Nos.1, 7, 8,12, 25 and 29 therein as illegal and void and consequently direct respondent No.1 to issue a fresh tender notice calling for tenders for the works shown thereunder from all the eligible contractors in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.94, dated 01.07.2003.” At the hearing, it is represented by the learned counsel for both the parties that since the short tender notice, which is impugned in this Writ Petition, outlived its purpose, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. Therefore, reserving the right of the petitioners to pursue the issues raised in this Writ Petition in appropriate proceedings in future if need be, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition as infructuous, WPMP No.1288 of 2011 and WVMP.Nos.702 and 858 of 2011 are also disposed of as infructuous. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 15.03.2011 ES