IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) MONDAY THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN : PRESENT: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE: P.S. NARAYANA CONTEMPT CASE No. 1272 of 2006 Between: B. Laxmi, W/o. B. Adi Reddy. .. Petitioner AND 1. Sri B. Rami Reddy, S/o. Municipal Commissioner, the Municipal Corporation, Karimnagar. 2. Sri V.R. Satish Chandra, the Director of Town and Country Planning, A.P., Hyderabad. (The Contempt Proceedings against R2 are hereby dropped, as per the Court orders dated: 12-02-2007) 3. Dr. A. Jayaram, S/o. Gundaiah, Occ: Medical Practitioner, R/o. H. No. 7-2-948, Mankammathota, Karimnagar District. (3rd respondent herein is not necessary) .. Respondents The Contempt Case filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to summon the respondents and punish them for willfully and deliberately disobeying the orders of this Hon`ble Court dated: 09-08-2006 in WP. No. 14772 of 2006; The Contempt Case coming on for hearing upon perusing the Case and the affidavit filed herein and the order of the High Court dated: 06-12-2006 and 01-02-2007 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri I. Aga Reddy, Advocate for the petitioner and of the G.P. for Municipal Administration for the respondents the Court made the following ORDER: “The Contempt Case was admitted on 01-02-2007 and the matter was directed to appear in the list for appearance of R1 and R2. R1 and R2 are present. Certain submissions are made by the learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration representing R-2 Sri V.R. Satish Chandra, the Director of Town and Country Planning, A.P. Hyderabad and also Sri Polisetty Radhakrishna, learned Standing Counsel representing Sri B. Rami Reddy, Municipal Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Karimnagar. Certain proceedings are placed before this Court and the relevant portions of the counter affidavits also had been pointed out. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the considered opinion that in the light of the order made by this Court, the role of the second respondent Sri V.R. Satish Chandra is very limited. The Contempt proceedings need not be further proceeded with as against R-2 Sri V.R. Satish Chandra and in view of the same, further proceedings as against Sri V.R. Satish Chandra are hereby dropped. But however, for further hearing as against R-1 inasmuch as R-1 is present in the Court, his presence is dispensed with. List the matter after two weeks for further hearing”. DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. Sri B. Rami Reddy, S/o. Municipal Commissioner, the Municipal Corporation, Karimnagar. (BY RPAD with a copy of petition and the affidavit) 2. Sri V.R. Satish Chandra, the Director of Town and Country Planning, A.P., Hyderabad. (BY SPECIAL MESSENGER) 3. One spare copy. Ksv HIGH COURT Ksv Date of drafting: 20-02-2007 PSNJ DATE: 12-02-2007 NOTE: POST AFTER TWO WEEKS ORDER C.C. NO. 1272 OF 2007 DIRECTION