IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 6855 of 2009 Between: Sri Subhash Chandra Patra, S/o. Shyam Sunder Patra Proprietor of Metro Agency, Office at 9-4-106, Regimental Bazar, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, O/o. The Divisional Railway Manager, Commercial Branch, Sanchalan Bhavan, Second Floor, Secunderabad. 2 Chief Commercial Manager, O/o. The Divisional Railway Manager, Commercial Branch, Sanchalan Bhavan, Second Floor, Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondents in non-providing 18 ton V.P.U. Container for loading of live stock on 29.03.2009 and on 30.03.2009 by Gauhaty Express i.e., Train No.2513 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to provide 18 ton V.P.U. Container for loading of live stock i.e. cows to be transported from Secunderabad to New Conch Bihar in my favour, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MRVENKATARAGHU RAMULU Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.B.H.R.CHOWDARY The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No : 6855 of 2009 O R D E R : This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the action of the respondents in not providing 18 ton V.P.U container for loading of live stock on 29.03.2009 and 30.03.2009 by Gouhaty Express is arbitrary and illegal. This Court, while issuing rule nisi, by order dated 02.04.2009 in W.P.M.P.No.8965 of 009 granted interim directions to the respondents to consider providing 18 ton V.P.U. container for loading live stock from Secunderabad to New Conch Bihar, if the petitioner satisfies all the requirements as per law within a period of three day. Learned counsel for the respondents states that in compliance with the said direction, the 18 ton V.P.U container was already provided. A counter affidavit has also been filed to that effect. Having regard to the fact that the container has already been provided, no further adjudication in necessary in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 23-07-2009 KLP