1 CWP 8914/09 In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench, Jaipur. ** Civil Writ Petition No. 8914/2009 Sanjay Mishra Versus The High Court of Judicature for ajasthan & anr. Date of Order ::: 07/09/2009 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Prahlad Singh, for petitioner. Instant petition has been filed against the order Annexure-8 dated 25/05/2009 whereby the petitioner has been compulsorily retired in exercise of powers under Rule 53(1) of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1996. In regard to the matters of compulsory retirement, remedy is available under Rule 35 of the Rajasthan Subordinate Courts Ministerial Establishment Rules, 1986. Remedy has been provided to the employee of submitting representation but it is nothing but an appeal under Rule 35 of the Rules 1986. Counsel submits that the limitation provided for submitting such representation is of three months and the petitioner within three days of the passing of order impugned had approached this Court and pending petition, the limitation period of filing representation has expired and this will cause prejudice to him while submitting representation under Rule 35 2 CWP 8914/09 of the Rules of 1986. This Court finds substance in the submissions so made. In view of the alternative remedy available to the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to exercise its extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, however, considers it appropriate to direct the petitioner to file representation under the Rules 1986 and if any such representation is submitted before the authority within ten days from today,the same may be treated within limitation and it is expected from the authority to decide it on merits expeditiously. The petition stands disposed of with liberty as referred above. (Ajay Rastogi), J. Raghu/p.2/ 8914CW09-Spt07.doc