bsb IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 111 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO. 111 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO. 111 OF 2008 IN IN IN CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL REVN. APPLICATION (ST) NO. 12421 OF 2008 REVN. APPLICATION (ST) NO. 12421 OF 2008 REVN. APPLICATION (ST) NO. 12421 OF 2008 Ganesh Feku Gupta ... Applicant v/s 1. Harilal Feku Gupta ... Respondent Indu Prasad i/by C.K.Tripathi for the applicant. H.S.Thakkar for the respondent. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 21ST JULY, 2008 21ST JULY, 2008 21ST JULY, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C.: 1. The applicant has filed the present application for condoning the delay of 438 days in filing the revision. According to the learned advocate for the applicant, the applicant was pursuing other remedies before this Court due to which there has been a delay. 2. The learned advocate for the respondent vehemently opposed this relief being granted to the applicant. He submits that the applicant was well aware that the application filed by him was not maintainable before the Additional Commissioner, Konkan Division and, therefore, ought not to have prosecuted that remedy. 2 3. Having considered the arguments of both the learned advocates, and in the facts and circumstances set out in the civil application, it is allowed. 4. Place the C.R.A. No.12421 of 2008 for admission on 6.8.2008. 5. Any interim orders passed earlier to continue till then.