IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.25975 of 2011 Date of decision:- 03.10.2011 Harbans Kaur ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present:- Mr. I.S. Brar Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Man Mohan Sikka, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Jagjit Gill, Advocate for the complainant **** AJAY TEWARI, J.(ORAL) This is a petition for regular bail in case bearing FIR No. 48 dated 04.03.2011 under Sections 306, 34 IPC registered at Police Station Sadar Dabwali, District Sirsa. On 29.08.2011, the following contention was noticed:- “Learned counsel has argued that the petitioner is the mother-in-law who has now been in custody for five months and actually under a compromise she and her son had transferred 106 kanals land and created FDRs of the amount of ` 15 lacs in favour of the minor grandson but later on the complainant side have resiled from the compromise. On his oral request, Jagvir Singh son of Late Sh. Baru Singh, r/o Ghukkawali, Sirsa, is impleaded as respondent No. 2. Registry is directed to make necessary correction in the memo of parties.” CRM-M No.25975 of 2011 2 Learned Deputy Advocate General on instructions from ASI, Jagdish has accepted these factual assertions but has denied that any compromise has been effect. It is not however denied that son of the petitioner is in custody. In this view of the matter, without commenting on the merits, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of regular bail to the petitioner on furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of trial Court. (AJAY TEWARI) 03.10.2011 JUDGE reena