1 WP No.1729/10 mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.1729 of 2010 Yadunath Upadhyay ... Petitioner versus The Municipal Corporation of Gr.Mumbai and anr. ... Respondents ... Mr. Manoj Kumar Upadhyay for the petitioner. Mr.S.R.Singh for respondent no.2. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATED : 29th July 2010 P.C. 1. I am not inclined to interfere in exercise of writ jurisdiction because the order is interlocutory and even otherwise, I am satisfied that the order requires no interference. After a notice about the alleged unauthorized construction issued by the respondent no.1 – Municipal Corporation of Gr.Mumbai, the petitioner filed a suit in the trial Court for a declaration that the notice was illegal and for an injunction restraining the Corporation from demolishing the alleged unauthorized illegal structure. Respondent no.2, who is a relative (cousin) of the petitioner made an application for joining himself as a party defendant. That application has been granted. 2 WP No.1729/10 2. In my view, though the respondent no.2 may not be a necessary party, his presence in the court would aid and assist the trial court in determining: what was the original structure and whether any additions/unauthorised erections have been made therein. The respondent no.2 may be a whistle blower at whose instance the corporation could have initiated the action. In the circumstances, I do not see any reason to interfere in the impugned order. Writ Petition is rejected summarily. (D.G. KARNIK,J.)