IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P.(T) No. 4995 of 2008. Decided on: 6th September, 2010. Deshinder Singh. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 to 4. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. None for respondents No. 5 to 8. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): The case of the petitioner, in a nut-shell, is that similarly situate persons have been promoted to the higher post. However, it has come in the reply that there was factual error, on the basis of which, respondents No. 5 to 8 were considered and promoted. It has also come in the reply that the process has been initiated to withdraw the regularization orders of respondents No. 5 to 8. If that is so, the needful shall be done by the respondents within a period of two months from today. 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. No. costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge September 06, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.