1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 867 OF 2008 Ladhuram Chunilal Badsiwal ... Appellant v/s The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & ors. ... Respondents Mr.Satish Mishra i/by Mr.A.M.Saraogi for the appellant. Smt.K.K.Soraan for the B.M.C. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 23RD NOVEMBER, 2009 P.C.: 1. The appellant has approached this Court against the notice of motion filed by him which has been dismissed. 2. The notice issued to the appellant was for unauthorized extension of the existing room Nos.11, 12 and 15 with part of brick masonry walls, M.S.grill, A.C. Sheets on roof to room Nos.12 and 15 and ladi coba roof on Room No.11. The 2 learned Judge, while dealing with the motion, has concluded prima facie that there was no evidence on record to indicate this extension was part and parcel of the original room Nos. 11, 12 and 15. In these circumstances, the Court has refused to grant interim injunction as prayed for. The notice has only been given for the unauthorized extension and thus does not in any manner indicate that Room Nos.11, 12 and 15 as they existed originally, would be demolished. 3. Appeal from order dismissed along with the Civil Application No.1039 of 2008. .....