p . ^>. HtGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. KLASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS W.P.(S) NoA*% of 2007 Ramsharan Sfngh S/o. Jagdlsh Prasad Singh, Aged about -35 yeare, By Caste - Kunbi (OBC), R/o.- Village Hutrakala, Tahsil- Tevthar, Distt.- Rewa flUIP.) Versus 1. Chairman, Coal hidia Ltd. 10, Netqi Subhash Road, Kollata (W.B.) 2. Direetor (P. & IR.), Coal India Ltd., 10, Netajl Subhash Road, Kolkata 0/V.B.) 3. h4ember Secretary, JBCC-VI (Joint Bipartite Committee for The Coal tndustry), Coal tnd® Ltd. 10, Netaji Subhash Road, Kolkata (W.B.) 4. Chairman-Cum-Managing Director, S.E.C.L. Head Qtr. Seepat Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. Chief Ganeral Manager, Hasdev Area, Distt- Korea (C.G.) WRTT PEnTION UNDER ARTICLE a6 OF TUEC^NSTrTUTJON OejMDW Appearance: Shri Rahul Mishra, counset for the peBttoner. Shri Praveen Das, eounselforfce respondenfs. ORAL ORDJR ~ (02.08.2007T SUNIL KUMARStNHA. J. Heard. Learned counsel appearing for the petittoner submte that the petitioner is similarly s'rtuated to that of (he respondents in the matter <rf Chairman, Central Coaflfefcfs L(ct & offiera Vs. Jlwncha Prawd Tiwari & otheis (Civil Appeal No. 1714 of 2007). Leamed counsd furttier submits that the said Civil Appqal has been disposed of vide oreter dated 29UI March, 2007, passed by the Hon'bte Supreme Gourt of Indta. Leamed counsel further submite that this case may ateo be disproed ef in the same terms, which the leamed counsel appearing for the respondents/S.E.C.L. does not controvert. In view of the above, the petition stands dispwed of in fte same terms. No order as to costs. — Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge vatti