1 caw2197 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2197 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.7107 OF 2002 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. Mr.V.C.Ghosalkar for the Applicant Mr.Shyam Walve i/b Mr.D.K.Ghaisas for the respondent no.1 CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : NOVEMBER 17,2011 P.C.: 1 Heard learned counsel for the applicants. The learned counsel for the first respondent seeks time on the ground that he is unable to contact his clients. 2 Writ petition already stood dismissed as against the second respondent and first respondent in the writ petition was duly represented by an Advocate. Hence, it appears that objection regarding non filing of affidavit of service 2 caw2197 was wrongly raised. Accordingly, case for restoration of the writ petition is made out. 3 Hence, application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (c). It is made clear that the writ petition is restored only as against the respondent no.1. Notice of restoration of the writ petition be issued to the respondent no.1. JUDGE