:1: :1: :1: HIGH HIGH HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. CRI. CRI. REV. APPLICATION NO. 476 OF 2002. REV. APPLICATION NO. 476 OF 2002. REV. APPLICATION NO. 476 OF 2002. Manohar Pandurang Lande. ..Petitioner. Versus. Laxmi Manohar Lande. ..Respondent. --- CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S.B.MHASE & S.B.MHASE & S.B.MHASE & D.B.BHOSALE, D.B.BHOSALE, D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE: DATE: DATE: MAY 3, 2005. MAY 3, 2005. MAY 3, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This matter was called out in the morning sessions but nobody was present. Therefore, it was kept back. The matter was again called out at 1.15 p.m., when also none is present. 2. We have gone through the judgment under challenge. Taking into consideration the change in circumstances and cost of living, the amount of maintenance awarded to the minor daughter has been enhanced to Rs.800/- per month, from the date of order,i.e., 28.8.2002. The wife is working in Police Department. The respondent claims that he is unemployed. However, the petitioner - husband is a able bodied person, well-educated and experienced man and taking into consideration the minimum wage, the quantum of maintenance for minor daughter is rightly fixed. In the circumstances, no interference is called for. Revision Application is, therefore, rejected. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, J.) J.) J.)