... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.186 OF 2006 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.1450 OF 2005 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri A. L. Gore for the Petitioner. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATE DATE DATE : JUNE 20, 2006. : JUNE 20, 2006. : JUNE 20, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. I am not inclined to accept the argument that it is the case of wilful disobedience of the order of the court. This is so because there is no direction given by this court to the Respondent-Bank to encash the F.D.R. of the Petitioner. The court has only expressed feasibility of encashment of said F.D.R. by the Respondent-Bank. Hence, Petition disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE