IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40191 of 2009 1. SHYAM BIHARI @ SHYAM BIHARI SINGH SON OF SRI KHAYALI PRASAD, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- ATTA CHAKKI NEAR HIMGIRI APPARTMENT, P.S. SRI KRISHNAPURI, DISTRICT- PATNA 2. DHIRAJ KUMAR @ DHIRAJ SINGH, SON OF DEO PRASAD SINGH, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA SHEIKHPURA, BAGICHA NEAR I.G.I.M.S. DHARMSHALA, P.S. SHASTRI NAGAR, DISTRICT- PATNA Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 07.12.2009 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners, the State and the informant, who files power. The offence alleged is under sections 406, 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner is to the effect that they were associate of the co-accused Sandip Singh and taken money from the complainant for getting their sons admitted in the Management quota in Madhya Pradesh, however neither the admission was got done nor the money was returned. Further allegation is that these petitioners also took active part in the alleged offence of cheating. Learned counsels appearing for the State and the informant oppose the prayer for bail and submits that in view of the specific allegation with regard to the alleged offence of cheating and criminal breach of trust, the petitioner are not entitled to be granted the privilege of anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation levelled against these petitioners, I am not inclined to grant them the privilege of anticipatory bail. Their prayer for bail, is accordingly, rejected. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)