IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 88 OF 1992. PETITION NO. 88 OF 1992. PETITION NO. 88 OF 1992. Maharashtra Shramik Sena & ors..... Petitioner. V/s. M/s Kothari Auto Parts Ltd. & ors.. Respondents. None for the petitioner. Shri D. K. Ghaisas for respondent Nos. 1, 3 & 4. CORAM CORAM CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. : V.C.DAGA, J. : V.C.DAGA, J. DATED DATED DATED 28.11.2005. 28.11.2005. 28.11.2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : ---- ---- ---- . On the last date of hearing i.e. o 14.11.2005, nobody had appeared on behalf of the petitioner.Consequently, the matter was adjourned for one week. Even today, nobody is present on behalf of the petitioners. Shri Ghaisas, learned Counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 submits that the matter has been settled out of Court. In support of this statement he has produced one letter dated 1st October 2005. The same is taken on record. Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs. . In the event petitioners decide to apply for restoration, it would be obligatory on the part of the petitioners to demonstrate that the cause of action for the petition survives.