[>•:'' ,^ol....^y^ ^•^s^- ..•••" ^•^^^ ^t^^' &»<B0"" IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR. C.G. WritPetition No.^—— of 2006 SM.GS F Petitioner Vs. Dr. (Mrs) Reshma Lokesh, aged 38 years, W/o Lokesh Sahu, R/o 6-B, Street No. 1, Sector- 8, Bhilai. J>i'^- J>fvr cc^ Respondents .<-rt' K&^ co^ l*(cl^2^ii-D} ^swVS%J State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Higher Education Directorate, DKS Bhawan, IVIantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner, Higher Education Directorate, Raipur (C.G.) Principal, Govt. Giris College, Durg. PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONST1TUTION OF INDIA FOR ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF WRITS OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR LIKE NATURE XI-HC-22 :SSf'^WW^,&lS\W16, fadltiy 3lt^l Ms«*i / CJ ,'?>.': 200 ^^ *<m<ifra5ww f^re^ sn^TW fewsn^r '»w»ufso 3(1^1 ^•wwHfer 7-7- Mr. Kishore Bhaduri, counse Mr. Symesh Bqjaj, ©ovt. ^dvocate for the Ststs/respondents, on advance copy. Heard both the counsel. By the instant writ petition tjnder Ariwle 22B6/227 of the Constitution of India, the petttjoner has questK June, 2006 whereby she has been t Dur9 to Lste &evipr'asad Choubey Sjsvt. College, Saaja, District: Dur-g. The petitioner is chQlien9Jn9 is a cancer pctient, he is taking tre|3tment at Bhjlai and they have no issue cnd there is no other family member t^ the petitionsr- has been trcsnsfer^ present place of posting, thsrefor4 I'o the picce of postin9 and return c^ the same day daiiy Tlier'efoce, learned couns4 petstioner may be a!io«ued to make turn, respondent No.l be directe^ learned 6ovt. Advoccte has no obje( Having heord learned couns| representation raising cil her" grouti today, and in turn, respondent No.3| +wld.i0-i *<it)c<Tfffeta <R)^K ^%f^n3T^?r ifor the petitioner. ned ths propriety of the order dctsd 30 'ansferrsd from Sovernment (Sirls Coltege, this or-der on the ground that her husband !ooj< after her husband. The place where ed is ot a dis+ance of 98 kms. fr'om his , !t is not possibie for the petitioner to go |i fov the pet'rtioner subfflits that ths ^ representation to respondent No.l and in to decide the swne. to which tion. for the parties ond having re9ord to the facts cnd drcumstances of the ^ase, the petitioner is aiiowed to make a ds to respondent No.l within 10 days from is dir-ected to decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of tw^ months from the dcte of its receipt cfter (if^^fe^) •J XI-HC-22 3^ '^WMf, W^W , Rlcllti^ ^^ •311^1 •<si<h ,_^ ^.fs. r5.^.'S-£)/ iiiwi sniicn ---•-•-•--••••••-•••• K^]- 200^ Rfc^i •WcRT'liT fewsn^r Niffflff ^. 5oma t-..^ r y y a>n^r5RfRKBfi<r 2L shAi! considering aii the points raised by th®mean tims, the petitioner reiieved, tiil the decision on the repi| With the dir-ections aforesai!)! Consequently, M.(W.)P.NO.( Parties we. entstied for certi) |the petitioner, in accordance with !a»if. In not be rslieved if she is not airetidy ^esentstion. I, the petition stands disposed of. ^9/2006 aiso stands disposed of. fied copy of this ordsr. - L.C. Bhadoo J'udge °bl<lt<'l<fl-( *<11CTTfftetA'<Rl*^K ^i^ff^iraTf^r [) (tft^y^)