(^\ IN THE HIGH COURT QFLCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (Sl No. ^ /9 OF 2010. S| al^ 'Qt 1^9';!^ PETITIONER ^\y^y^ L^fc^ ^•\^^v y^-^ ^-<-°' c- A/y^ '^^ .^' .. ^••••••" .(^' Virendra Kumar Baghel, S/o. Shri Sudarshan Ram Baghel, aged about 38 years, Head Master, Janpad Primary School Bhanbeda, District Kanker (C. G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ; 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) ,4y^-.. ^": ^ v^^y^-j^j i ^\ ^-^^^'y^; | Y^. ^.^/l "^—........„.--- 2. The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) 3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Kanker, District Kanker (C. G.) 4. Block Education Offlcer, Bhanupratappur, District Kanker (C. G.) ^y 5. Treasury Officer, Treasury Account and Pension, kanker, District kanker(C. G.) ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ XI-HC—78 'ysf '^i^!dAi, ^NPT?, i^rray /r.&..^...%sr:<°.-&^..^ ^n^T 1q^?T (^t^^) ^T^r^Tf^iw ^^T3:n^?^m^ I^T^ ^W^ 3^[ SB : MR. JUSTICE PRIflNKSR DIWAKER 29.10.20a0 Shri Somkant Verma, counsjc ShriVivek Sharma, P.L. for ^l for the petitioner, the State. The petitioner, who was Assistant Teacher under fbe Sch( 20.07.94 (Annexure P/1) is agi respondents in not a.ddiug two ad^ even though he did his D.Ed. froiDJ Shiksha Board, Bhopal at his after seekiog pesTnission for the s^: appoiuted on the post of <j>ol Educatiou Depaitment ou ^ieved by tlie actiou of the j'au.ce in.crenients iu h.i.s sa.lar^7' Madhya Pradesh. Madhyaiiiik cost ia the year June 1999 from. the departm.e.n.t. owti s^me Coii.usel for th.e petl.ti.oner entitled for two a.d.van.ce .m.crem.eii.ts ExaiD.uiatioa certiiicate, ixi accortlaiice Circular dated 24. .12.98 and in vi^w Supreme Court io tiie inatter ofj BadririaraYaii AchsiYa and 'otheijs aiid Yashwaat Kuinar Bhardwai Durg aiid anofeer reported ia 200(5 On the oth.er hajid; couns< ersUvhiie State of Madhya P^ 22.10.1964 allowed advance goverament ser^aiits who proj 22.10.1964 whether at his own c^ Howeyer, who proceeded ^n_train^i ^Pif^pfrT 'RFI^ff "^ fe^ Tf^l^K ^'^ti^i^n^i ,ubixiit.s th.at tlie petiti.oner.is as h,e had obfeiiiied D.Ed. iaiice .with the provisious of of the judgments of Hon'ble State of M.P. & Aaother Vs. reported m 1996 SC 2779 Vs. Municipal Corporatiou, (II) MPJR 96 (CG). bl for the Sts.tc submits that hadesh. vide circular dated iiicrcments only to those 'eeded; for .traio.ia.g up to ^st or a.t the goveiTiment cost. i^ on or after 23.10, 1964 can -2T ^ XI-HC—78 -3-rof '^fRTf^jZj^ iNhFI^, f^TRTy ..^£:l^...^..:...^^dh 'q^^ ('^3^?) sn^i^rf^it^ ^m^T^T^^t^ -^m Govemitaexit, get two aiinual iacrenients only ill not at the cost of the 23.10.1964 was superceded videj Goverainent vide notification da$ Non-Gazette Class-II Educa.tiDiial K Recraitaient arid Promotion Rulet B.T.I. or B.Ed degree for Teacher. The petitioner woul<t Bicreraents oiily in the coii.ditid B.T.I/B.Ed./B.T.I. degree at his obtainiiig pei'missio.n foi-m tlie to 1,3.99, To clarijy fhe above p^ been issued on 6,2,2007 ajid on ^i ioiial IServices a.ppoiiit^sient Facts, as detail.ed above. ai1 the m.a.tter of Yashwaiit Kum.ar discii.ssnig the circzilars dated upoD the judgnient of the Honl')|e Badrbiarayan. Achaxya's case (si not assistant tea.ch.ers alone, woib.id. iiicrenients on obtaming B.Ed 22.10.1964, as the circular prescribe aiiy outer llimit of the ^ 8& B.T.I. certificate. It has been fii 1.3.99 is applicable to only.Assi.sj other teachers (UDT). ^s^I<n<fl*t ^TR^f ^* fe^ iM^i< ^a^R^3?i^r fhe toraiuing is a.t his cost and Th.is circular of dated order dated 10.12.1975. The ted 16.6.1973 amended M.P. (Non-coUege Sen7ices) ^ 1993 added qiiali&cation of oii tlie post of Assistant be entitled for advauce |n tliat he had obtained his |own cost duriiig service after bartment between 23,10,1964 ^sition, circiilai's have already 10.1.09. not in d.i.spii.te, This Coiirt in phai'a.dwaj (supra) el.abora.tel.y (24.12.98, 1.3.99 and relying Apex Court; iii. the niatter of ipi-a) has held that teach.ers, sb.id be entitled to -two advance ex.am-in.ation ceitlficate alter (lated 22.10.1964 does not ;riod ofobtain.mg B.Ed, M.Ed lirt'her lield that circulaT dated fant Teachers (LDT) and. not. to -f- XI-HC—78 "s^ '^7i^i<n4, '^tTWR', T^rray ^T^T ^^ ('^3^?) sn^T^r^ft^ Tl^3?T^¥?^^W 'r'Ri?^ ^rfN ^it^T Shri Sharma fairlv submitsl in Yashwaat Kumar Bharadwai fiiiaiity aLod case ofthe petitiouer covered by ' fhe above j'u.dgm.| 24.12.1998. For fh.e aibrcsaid reasons, paynient of two advaace increine4ts of the petitioner's D.Ed. exainio.j are accord.io.gty d.irected to m.sp<:e increinents to fhe petitioner frooij examiaatiou, withiji a period However, th.is order shall be subjj the State regaidiag tacts pleaded No order as to costs, ^S^S^^PT ^i^alr ^ f^S TJ^T^R ^^tf^a^T lfh.at prixiciple oflaw lm<l down i?s case (supra) has attained iii tliis petition is also'squarely snt a.s also circular dated Lhe petitiouer is entifled to tlie frow. tlie date of declaration |:ition result. The respondents pa.yment of Iwo advaiice the date ofher pass.ing D,Ed. ^f four .mo.nths from today, bct to all verifications :made by |.n the petitio.ri. Sd/- pritinker Diwaker Judge .^