6. cr appln 3604-10.doc RMA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. APPLICATION NO. 3604 OF 2010 Sheetal Jagannath Shinde .. Applicant Vs Ramesh Bohara & Anr .. Respondents Mrs. Pranali Kakade i/b Jayashree Gade for the Applicant Ms. G.P. Mulekar, APP for the State Mr. Sanjay Kadam i/b Nishigandh Patil for Respondent 1 CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J DATE : 24th JANUARY, 2011. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant-original complainant, learned APP and learned counsel for the respondent no. 1-accused. 2. The application is for cancellation of bail granted by the learned Sessions Judge, Mumbai in C.R. No.90 of 2010 of Azad Maidan Police Station under Sections 354 and 420 of IPC. The learned APP, on instructions, makes a statement that investigation is completed and charge sheet has been filed. After perusal of the complaint, I do not see any reason to set aside the 1 6. cr appln 3604-10.doc order passed by the Sessions Court granting anticipatory bail. The learned counsel for the applicant contends that there is possibility that respondent-accused may tamper with the prosecution case. The learned APP also makes a request that the respondent-accused may be directed to attend the police station every week pending the trial to which Mr. Kadam, the learned counsel for respondent no. 1 has no objection. 3. For the aforesaid reasons, the impugned order stands modified to the effect that respondent no. 1-accused shall attend Azad Maidan Police Station on every Sunday between 11.00 a.m. to 01.00 p.m. pending the trial in the case. 4. Application is disposed of accordingly. [ J.H. BHATIA, J ] 2 6. cr appln 3604-10.doc 3