^' W i€WKTOF_WHAJ3~i^AWAJSD-Aym Writ Patition ?S) Nb-4192 of 2008 PetitEoner Verais Respondents 1. z. 3. 5mt. Oiampi HiruMni, Wd/o Lo+e Choworam Hirwani, c^sd about S2 yeors, R/o Behirtd Bdrphani Aashram, Ward No. 19, Rajnandgaon (C.&) State of Ghhattisgarh, Througb - The Secretary, EducaTion Department, &.K.5. Bhawcm, Raipur (CA) &jSTricr Educetion Officer, Rajnandgaon, Otett- Rajnandgaon (C.&5. Principa!, M.L.B. 6ovt. Sirfs M.H.5. School, Rajnandgaon (C.&) WRTT PETmON UNbER ARTICLE 226 OF THE cos^mtmoN SB: t-ion'ble Sirj Sotish K. Agniliotn. J. 3nr\ Anoop AAajumdar, Advocate for the petittQner. Ms Sunitojain. Pane! Lauiyerfor the reqiondants. ORALORDER (Passed on this 1st day of August, 2008) 1- By this petition the petitioner has challenged the yaiyity of •rtie ^n order dated 24.4.2CM36 (Annexure P/2) to the extent of givino effect +!-ie date of Second up-grodation from 1-8.2003 instead pf 1.1.1999 and the prder dated 7.7.2008 (Annexure P/4). uihereby the re^sondents have (iirected recovery pf fl aim of Rs. 53.036/- (Fifty Three Thousand and Thirty' Six) frorB •rtie re+iral dues^of •the husbadd ofthe petitioner. • , ms^ss'-Si&^S'fKSSSSSse.s^^^wsssEWtSvsae^sS^S^ ? 1: t ;^^^^^^^^^s'^ E BU 2- Learned counset appeanng fur the petitioner sMbinits that the huaband of the petitioner wws Uioi'king on the post of Assistont Tencher and he conripieted 24 years pfsei'viCeon 13.3-1999- Thareafter. the husband of the peti+ioner was gnuTted second Krimonnati vide order duted 17.1Q.2(K)0 (Annexyre P/l) w.e.f. 1-1-1998. The husband of the petitioner diec! on 9.4.2008. Thereafter the respnndent Np-3 issued the impugned order dated 7.7.2008 (Annexure P/4) for covery of Rs. 53036/- towards excess psynier't on accoynt pf second Kriinonatti pnid durin9 the period 1.1.1998 tp 31-3-2008. The jnipugned order of recovery has been paased uiithout affopding an ppportunity of hearing to the tietitioner. 3. In suppot't of his contention that the recovery cannot be macle wi+hout affordingon opportunity ofhear^, ieflmed counsel relies on s decision of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Sohib Ra»n Vs. Stat® of Haryana wid othws a decision of •this Court in V'idyadhar Tiwari Vs. Stats of Chhati-i^arh & othwszandR. R. Tiwari vs. Stats of C.S. & others3. 4. In view of the foregoing ond as ndmitted by fanmed counsel appearing for both the parties, this petitjon stands dispoffid pf in teripS of the order possed in the cdse of Vidyodhar ThiWlri (Supra).if the impugned ordei* was passed ••iiithoutdffordmg an •{!9°5Supp(l}S.C.C.2Q1} 2 { 2006 (i) M.P.H.T. 105 (C.G.)2 } 3 (20U8 (2) C.G.L.J. 3!W) -J^ES^^ ^ Thd<ur opnorhjnityof hearing to the petitioner. The order dated 7,7,20(M! (AnnexureP/4) is quashed. The petitioner is entitled to ful! 1-etiral benefits, uiithou-t- any deduction. The aniount, so deducted be paid to-rfiepetitionei'wi+hsinipleinterest. _ 5. HouBver. it js open to the respondents to tnke recourse to Ru!e6B of the Chhatt-isgarh Civil Services (Pension) Rules; 1976, if so advised, for the purpose of recovery and odjustment of Soyeminent dues, in accprdance with laui and foilowing basic principles of ruturo! justice.No orde.r as to costs. 6. In view of the aboye, this petition is allowed to the obove extent. No costs. SdA Satish K. AgniJlotri Judge .'?" ^s. ll.illJlili