1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1837 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.1837 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.1837 OF 2007 Union of India & Ors. .. Petitioners. vs. M.D. Pawar & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr. R.R. Shetty for Petitioners. Mr. G.K. Masand i/by S.K. Jain for Respondents. CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & K.K. TATED, JJ. K.K. TATED, JJ. K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE: 9TH SEPTEMBER, 2008. DATE: 9TH SEPTEMBER, 2008. DATE: 9TH SEPTEMBER, 2008. P.C. . The learned counsel appearing for the respondents had placed before us a certified copy of the decision dated 23.4.2008 of CAT in Contempt Petition No. 30/2007 in O.A. No. 16/2005 wherein the proceedings came to be dropped as infructuous in view of the fact that the petitioners have issued an establishment order no. 4/2008 which confers benefits of Assured Career Progression Scheme on the respondents on the conditions mentioned in the said order, a copy of which is also annexed along with the certified copy 2 of the said order passed in the Contempt Petition. The same is taken on record and marked "X" collectively. In view of this, the learned counsel for the parties submit that this petition can be disposed of by setting aside the finding of CAT as mentioned in the concluding para of the impugned order i.e. para 10. 2. We, therefore, dispose of this petition in view of the fact that the respondents have already been conferred the benefits under the ACP Scheme. As such, the impugned order as spelt out in para 10 is quashed and set aside. The petition stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (K.K. Tated J.) (K.K. Tated J.) (K.K. Tated J.)