IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.277 of 2010 BIMAL KUMAR SON OF LATE SATYA NARAYAN MISHRA, RESIDENT OF GANGHARA NIWAS MOHALLA BASANT VIHAR COLONY, BORING ROAD, P.S. SHRI KRISHNAPURI, PATNA- 800001. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH DIRECTOR, PROSECUTION, MAIN SECRETARIATE, BARACK NO. 5, EASTERN PART, PATNA- 800015. 2. GYANDEO SHARMA SON OF LATE SUKHDEO SHARMA. 3. ANUPMA SHARMA WIFE OF VISHNU SHARMA 4. DIWAKAR SHARMA SON OF RAMAKANT SHARMA ALL RESIDENTS OF NAINTARA SADAN, WEST OF I.B.P PETROL PUMP, BORING ROAD, P.S. SHRI KRISHNAPURI, PATNA- 800001. ----------- 2 13.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as also the respondent no.3 in person. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the only prayer of the petitioner is that the trial being Tr. No. 906 of 2010 presently pending in the court below arising out of Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 213/1999 G. R. No. 2836/1999 should be expedited as the same is pending for long. Learned counsel for the respondent no. 3, who appears in person as also the State submit that they are not objecting the expeditious disposal of the trial. Respondent no. 3, however, submits that the allegation of the petitioner to the effect that respondent no. 3 is delaying the disposal of the trial is not correct. However, for redressal of her grievances as permissible under the law, the cases were filed without going into the details of matter. The trial in question be expedited without allowing unnecessary adjournments. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter as also the rights and contentions of the respective parties. The writ application stands disposed of. Amrendra/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)