IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9240 of 2010 NAND KUMAR ROY, S/O LATE BHUNESHWAR RAY, R/O VILL.- MIRZAPUR, GOSHALA ROAD, P.S.- DARBHANGA SADAR, DISTT.- DARBHANGA ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE ADDL. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MUZAFFARPUR ZONE, MUZAFFARPUR 4. THE D.I.G., TIRHUT RANGE, MUZAFFARPUR. 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MUZAFFARPUR. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 21.5.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State. The grievances of the petitioner is that a sum of Rs.2,97,447/- has been recovered from his retiral dues allegedly on the ground that the petitioner, who was a Constable and ought to have retired on 30th of November, 2004, continued in service even after the aforesaid date and as such, the excess amount paid to him for the period he worked after the aforesaid date has been recovered. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner objected to the aforesaid recovery and had filed a representation highlighting his grievances, vide annexure 3, but the same has not been considered as yet. The learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the grievances of the petitioner shall be considered as per law without delay. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims 2 as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur (respondent no.5). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of his grievances as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of eight weeks, the representation of the petitioner shall be considered in accordance with law and disposed of by a reasoned order expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. In case the representation of the petitioner finds favour, the amount deducted be refunded back. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)