Single B®nch IN THE HIGH COURT OFJUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Cr.M.P. No. ...^.U...../2011 PETITIONERS Revisioners 1) 2) 3) p.R.tto....-^--^,, p^d^^^T; ^a^cd..*•"•"* ",a<ed... Anirudha S/o Shri Goverdhan Chandra, Agted about: 39 years, Kainal Deo S/o Dashrath Chandra, aged about 35 years, Goverdhan Chandra S/o Lekhrani Chandra, aged about 58 years, AU by caste Chandranahu, Occupation Agriculturist, AU Resident of Village Chhote Gantuli, P.S. Kosir, District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT Non-AppUcant State of Chhattisgarh fhrough District Magistrate Raigarh, Distnct Raigarh (C.G.) /'"" PETITION UNDER SECTION 482* OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE T I-HC—78 <flWIT »W^ S'ST '<inW^, ®Tll'M<l<o, fsKtl'My ..^r.^..1R>.:..v^.:..^.?.'.../..)..l•^200 311^1'^^' ('yf3^q) an^rw K-f\^i T^TT 3H^T ai*l Deepii WiIW^lfCTOT^I SB : Hon'bte Shri Manindra Mohan S 2-!<7-2Q11 Shri Ralesh Kumar Sharma. coi) i-1eard on admission. This petition has been fiied b^ 23/6/2011 (Annexure A/1) passed ir1 passed by the Judicial Magistrate Firet| Learned counsel for the petiti(j learned Magistrate committed the casej iwo cases arises out of the same ailegations contained in two FiRs. h) difference in time in which. the inci<t incident has taken piace. He subnlits properly appreciated by the Court belo^ i have gone through the two Fi| that the incident out of which ihe two the same. The two parties had enterejj construction at the site of construction.l Therefore, in the opinion of th| committed bv the Court below soas Section 482 CrPC. The petition is acc<t <+>l-yl<t1^1'1 *IH^' Tf FS^ <f^l<$l< ^ aiRiq dll^l hrivastava, J. nsei for the petitioner. the petitioner aggrieved by order dated revision whereby order dated 14/3Q011 Ciass, Sarangam has been affirmect. ner submits that the order passed by the to the Sessions Judge on the basis that the incident contrary to the contents ofthe e submitsthat in botti the cases, there is lent taken place as aiso the piace where that his aspect of the matter was not v. Therefbre, it requires interference. te recorded by the police. The FiRs show :'\Rs have been fodged NT appear<»to be into quarrel with each other with regard to s Court, there is no perversity or iilegatity io warrant interference by this Court under irdingly dismissed. ^. - ..^'n^W^3 ^anWdra "'judge r