HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION No.30612 OF 2011 ORDER: 1. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to demolish the illegal constructions being made by respondents 3 and 4 on plot No.23-3- 120, situated at Sultan Shahi, Hyderabad forthwith. 2. Heard. 3. It is stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition that the petitioner is the owner and resident of plot No.23-3-120, situated at Sultan Shahi, Hyderabad, and adjacent to the petitioner’s house, there is a house bearing No.23-3-120, belongs to respondents 3 and 4; for the last two weeks, the respondents 3 and 4 are demolishing their existing structures, started digging the land for making constructions in the cellar without municipal permission and without leaving any set backs; the external wall of the house of the petitioner is connecting to land of the respondents 3 and 4; that therefore, the petitioner has lodged a complaint before the respondents 1 and 2 to take appropriate action against the respondents 3 and 4 for their illegal constructions, but the respondents 1 and 2 failed to take any action on the complaint lodged by the petitioner and hence the present writ petition is filed. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the respondents 3 and 4 are making constructions illegally in the premises in question and are digging the land without even leaving the set backs; that even though the petitioner lodged a complaint before the respondents 1 and 2 to take appropriate action against the respondents 3 and 4, they failed to do so and hence he prays to allow the writ petition. 5. On the other hand, the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 contended that the representation dated 10.11.2011 submitted by the petitioner will be considered after giving a reasonable opportunity to the respondents 3 and 4 and appropriate decision will be taken on the representation of the petitioner dated 10.11.2011. 6. There cannot be any dispute that nobody can make any constructions contrary to the sanctioned plan approved by the competent authority. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents 3 and 4 are making constructions illegally violating the sanctioned plan without leaving the set backs and are digging the land adjacent to the wall of the petitioner’s house. Respondents 1 and 2 have to verify physically whether the respondents 3 and 4 are making constructions illegally without leaving any set backs contrary to the building byelaws. 7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents 1 and 2 to take appropriate decision in accordance with law on the complaint dated 10.11.2011, lodged by the petitioner after physically verifying the constructions and also after giving reasonable opportunity to the respondents 3 and 4 with regard to the alleged illegal constructions, if any, and take appropriate decision within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ K.C.BHANU,J. 18.11.2011, Gk. Issue CC in a week. BO GK HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION No.30612 OF 2011 Date:18.11.2011 Gk.