pvr 1 wp70-10 IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.70 OF 2010 M.S.Rajagopalan. ...Petitioner vs. 1.Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation & ors. ...Respondents --- Mr.P.M.Havnur, for Petitioner. Ms.Priti Purandare, for BMC. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATED: 13th June,2011 P.C.: 1. By this petition, the petitioner challenges two conditions imposed by the Corporation for granting permit to the petitioner. By first condition, he is directed to pay Rs.1000/- to the Corporation. Even assuming pvr 2 wp70-10 that the Corporation is not justified in demanding that amount, considering that only Rs. 1000/- is demanded by the Corporation, in our opinion, it is not necessary for this Court to consider this condition. So far as the second condition is concerned, all that the Corporation requires is that the petitioner should indemnify the Corporation against any expenditure that the Corporation may incur if it is joined as a party to any litigation between the petitioner and the landlord. We do not see any illegality in the condition, as it does not relate to the present litigation. It relates to any litigation which may arise in future between the petitioner and the landlord. The petition is, therefore, disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J.) (R.G.KETKAR,J.)