IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6590 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.02.2009 Ram Kumar .............. Petitioner Vs. Punjab National Bank and others ............Respondents Present: Mr. J.S. Saneta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? -.- K.KANNAN, J.(ORAL) 1. The order impugned is a warrant of attachment issued by the Court on 29.09.2007 against the second respondent-Judgment debtor before the Executing Court. 2. The Executing Court passed an order on 23.12.2008 that the Provident Fund and salary of the JD stands released. The civil revision is, therefore, become infructuous and dismissed accordingly. However, It shall be open to the revision petitioner to approach the Decree-holder Bank to release the salary, which has been held back. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE February 11, 2009 Pankaj*