IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.878 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision 07.02.2011 Laxmi Chand ...... Petitioner VERSUS Sumer Chand and another ...... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Vinod Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J: Aggrieved against the order dated 27.01.2011, passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Rohtak whereby the secondary evidence, which was to be adduced by the petitioner-defendant No.1, was closed by order, he has preferred this petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no sufficient time was given to the petitioner to prove the sale deed as he was to summon the witnesses. The permission for leading secondary evidence for proving the sale deed No.3390 dated 21.02.1974 was sought for which was allowed on 20.01.2011 and the secondary evidence was closed on 27.01.2011. Out of these six days 23.01.2011 and 26.01.2011 were holidays, as such he could not take effective steps to serve the witnesses. In these circumstances, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to conclude his evidence within two months positively, subject to payment of Rs.2,000/- as costs. This petition is disposed of without issuing notice to the respondent/s with a view to impart complete justice to the parties and to save the huge expenses, which may be incurred by the respondent/s as also in order to avoid unnecessary delay in adjudication of the matter. Still, if dissatisfied, the respondent/s may move this court for recalling this order. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 07.02.2011 mamta-II