THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No. 936 of 2010 JUDGMENT: 1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is preferred aggrieved by the order dated 03.07.2010 in I.A. No. 1005 of 2009 in O.S. No.89 of 2009 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Srikakulam, whereunder and whereby the trial court granted interim injunction restraining the respondents therein from making any alienations or creating any encumbrance over the suit schedule property, pending disposal of the suit. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant contended that no reasons are assigned in passing the impugned order, and so it is liable to be set aside. 3. The suit is filed by the first respondent/plaintiff for partition of the suit schedule property. There is no dispute that right to reason is an indispensable part of sound judicial system. But, at the same time, the impugned order is only an interlocutory order which would subsist till disposal of the suit. Subject matter of the suit is whether the suit schedule property is liable for partition or not, and the same has to be decided in the suit itself. Therefore, to safeguard the interest of the parties, the trial Court rightly passed the impugned order. That order does not suffer from any infirmities. 4. Therefore, there are no grounds to admit the C.M.A., and the same is, accordingly, dismissed at the admission stage. No costs. However, the trial Court shall dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible subject to part-heard and other old cases. _______________ K.C. BHANU, J 12.11.2010 DRK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No. 936 of 2010 Date: 12.11.2010 Between: D.Satendra Varma …Appellant And Nadimipalli Sarojinidevi & others …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No. 936 of 2010 12.11.2010