1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3837 OF 2008 (Nagalla Sureshbabu Kashipati vs. VIth Joint Civil Judge, Nagpur & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. NOVEMBER 10, 2008. Heard Shri Thakkar, learned counsel for the petitioner – plaintiff and Shri Gordey, learned counsel for respondents No. 2, 5 & 6. The grievance of Shri Thakkar, learned counsel is that the Court below did not pass a reasoned order and also did not make the order available even for perusal. The operative order was made available and the parties were asked to act upon the operative part only. He contends that this could not have been done. Shri Gordey, learned counsel contends that because of various problems, the entire reasoned order could not be made available. In the present facts, I do not find it necessary to go into the merits of the controversy because this Court has on 02.09.2008 protected the present petitioner. Shri Thakkar, learned counsel states that 2 now the petitioner has received certified copy and within a period of 10 days, steps will be taken to file Appeal against Order and appropriate orders will be obtained in it. Shri Thakkar has also requested that interim order should be continued at least for a period of ten days for that purpose. The perusal of impugned order dated 21.8.2008 shows that the Court below has pronounced only operative part. If this was the position, what was the necessity for said Court observing that the parties should act upon operative order till the detailed or reasoned order was made available, is not clear. However, said Court has also observed that said detailed/ reasoned order was at the relevant time under typing. It, therefore, appears that the order was dictated and only operative order was made available for perusal of the parties. The Court below in that case should have recorded the reasons for making immediately available only operative part and why entire order could not be made available within few days. Such a course of action would have definitely avoided the unnecessary arguments and the approach before this Court. In the circumstances, the present petitioner – plaintiff is given time till 19.11.2008 to 3 file Appeal against Order before the appropriate forum and obtain appropriate orders in it. The interim order passed by this Court on 2.9.2008 to continue till then. The order of this Court be communicated to the trial Court. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.