IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3789 of 2003 Date of decision:21.04.2009 Sadhu Singh and others ...Petitioners versus Saroj Khullar and others ...Respondents 2. Civil Revision No.3790 of 2003 Sadhu Singh and others ...Petitioners versus Saroj Khullar and others ...Respondents 3. Civil Revision No.3791 of 2003 Sadhu Singh and others ...Petitioners versus Saroj Khullar and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KANNAN Present: None for the petitioners. Mr.Arun Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr.Chetan Salathia, Advocate for the respondents. ----- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? K.Kannan, J.(Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the respondents points out that the civil revisions are against orders passed under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC in a pending suit and that the suit itself has now been disposed of. The other revisions also pertain to interim orders in pending suit. Civil Revision No.3789 of 2003 - 2 - 2. Having regard to the representation that the suit itself has been disposed of, nothing survives in revisions and both the revisions are dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. No costs. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 21.04.2009 sanjeev