IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 22ND JUNE 2007 / 1ST ASHADHA 1929 WP(C).No. 19358 of 2004(D) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- MOHANAN, THARATTUVELI, KAMMADY WARD, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ALAPPUZHA. REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, ALAPPUZHA. 2. THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REP. BY THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, ALAPPUZHA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. K.U. MANOJ KUMAR, ADV.SRI.K.PRABHAKARAN, SC, K.S.R.T.C. ADV.SRI. T. RAVIKUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.19358/2004: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE REGULAR PERMIT DTD. 10/11/03. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE ORDER OF R.1. DTD. 03/02/03. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE ORDER IN MVAA. NO. 218/03 DTD. 14/06/04. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE APPROVED SCHEME IN RELATION TO THE QUILON-ALAPPUZHA NOTIFIED ROUTE IN KERALA GAZETTE NO. 47 DTD. 23/11/1960. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE APPROVED SCHEME IN RELATION TO THE ALAPPUZHA- ERNAKULAM NOTIFIED ROUTE, KERALA GAZETTE NO. 45 DTD. 11/11/1960. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE R.1. DTD. 29/03/1999. EXT.P.7: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE R.1. DTD. 30/05/2006. EXT.P.8: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE R.1. DTD. 03/08/2005. EXT.P.9: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE R.1. DTD. 30/06/2004. EXT.P.10: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE R.1. DTD. 30/06/2004. EXT.P.11: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE R.1. DTD. 30/05/2006. EXT.P.12: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE R.1. DTD. 28/10/2005. EXT.P.13: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE S.T.A.T. DT. 12/10/2006 IN M.V.A.A. NO. 557/2006. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// prv. KURIAN JOSEPH, J. --------------------------------------- W.P. (C). NO. 19358 OF 2004 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of June, 2007. J U D G M E N T Petitioner is aggrieved by Exhibit P3 judgment passed by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Ernakulam. The issue pertains to the renewal of permit for operating stage carriage on the route Kalavoor-Erattakulangara as town service. 2. It is not disputed that the judgment of the Appellate Authority requires re-consideration, in view of the decision of this Court reported in Mohammed Naseem vs. Regional Transport Authority & Ors. (2003(1) KHCACJ 501(Ker)). Hence, I set aside Exhibit P3. 3. There will be a direction to the State Transport Appellate Tribunal to consider the matter afresh in the light of the above decision and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Direction for temporary permit issued by this Court will continue till such time. This writ petition is disposed of as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. smp