IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P.(T) No. 16196 of 2008. Decided on: 6th September, 2010. Sariata Devi and others. …Petitioners. -Versus- The State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : None. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Mr. O.P. Sharma, Director of Education (Secondary) present in person. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. O.P. Sharma, Director of Education (Secondary), Government of H.P. submits that the reply was not filed for the simple reason that a similar issue has been considered by this Court in Nek Ram and Others Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Others, CWP(T) No. 14232 of 2008, decided on 17th November, 2009. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of petitioner in view of the principle laid down by this Court in the judgment dated 17th November, 2009, as noticed above, within a period of eight weeks from today. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge September 06, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?