IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.1274 of 2009 Date of decision:24.02.2010. Chander Parkesh and others ...Petitioners Versus Krishan Lal Kalu Ram ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. None for the respondent. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. The learned counsel for the petitioners – tenants states that he is not in a position to press the petition on merits. However, he requests for little morewhile for vacation of the tenanted premises by the petitioners – tenants. This, it is argued, would enable the petitioners – tenants to arrange for alternative accommodation. In the light thereof, this petition is disposed of as not pressed. The petitioners – tenants shall have one year's time from today to vacate the tenanted premises. In the meantime, the petitioners – tenants shall keep on paying due rent to the respondent – landlord by the 10th of every calendar month. February 24, 2010 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE