U^ f^?/5 ' THE MADHYA PRADESH STATE ADMINISTRATIVE. TRIBUNAL JABALPUR BENCH of1997 APPLICANTS:'!. 3nri Hari Daval Gond s/o Shri Jai Sinah aeed about 22 years, Tweive moaithly Sqadman 0/0 The Assistaiit Settiemest Officer, WaarafNaear. District Sarauia. ^. Sui'i yraiesara &.umar ladav is,'" asn aoiiar r'rasaa laaav. aesa about 28 vears. Tweive menthre Sqadman 0/0 The Assisiaut Settisment Ofiicer. v/adra.i'Naaar, Districi Sarsuia. 3. Shri Rasik Gooai Twari s/o Shri SaivaNaravaa Tiwan. ased iroout 26 vsars. Tweive mon&iv Sqaaman 0/0 Th'e Assistant Settiemsnt OiTicer. AiiDiKOT-ff. Uistrici 5iirg8ia. 4, Shrimati RitaDubev w./o S'ari Dubev. aaec; about 25 vears. Tweive mositru'i,' Suauiaan U;U liis settiement Unicer, AmoiKaiiur, Uistrici Sarauia. vs. RESPONDENTS: 1. The Stats of Madhva Pradesh throueh the Secretary, F^evemB Deoartment. Vaiiabn Bhawm. Bhooai. 2. Tae Sesisment C'mcer East Sarmia. -'unbikapur, District Sarauja, DETAILS OF THE APPLICATION 1:1^1. i: i 11 1 JL4 :H IHI SiRgieSeRchKHon'l (i3ET@ONSR 8SSRQNDENTS Wer^is |.Han Dayal.GCTxt;arri^8thers.^:i;;. '^ :'-'J--:'... ••. ' •• : •." ' -:; . • ••• '. "• ''.'. ^lte;;^St^e,^<rf - 'Nerihya, ^Pr^lesh., aRd:. 'anSthier.'": ; • ' • ' .:1:::: ::: •''.: :1 w& ^•!'':^ Shr!Rahul^is|v^,GbunselfortheE»itiQngrs. Stiri'Bh^tai'Pagasi.PaSefLsawyet'fQrttii&State. ;KE: -•Kf, :t;:l: t-seara. (2)The 12-oa-i^ Origiiiat Stat& jisdmini'^rs ive ication on •;Nl)i^A85®; t,^:':'the':',pstB!is ntinrelat!j&Bt ^N^he.'BE un<fer:the|S!gRatu ;of:il wifhregac^ltooths? ermiRatiQn.'slat8W(^;l*H'^l^§j BORfor^sUar^Ns isubmittej::l:ttii'.'ordefti;'W; No.3,^hkA;w8s|®SH&l|f}iQm. 'Ea^fSur^ija^ArRN^siiBr ia8^hifcan'!ta^.|S>Eii'g|U^ii IstBtsmerrt: haa;Seen:'a^e. ',,ai'elwQriar^|siyfhe;^l-^rKl:i fA': !llB •SBt :ili Rewrt Branch ^of ©ollei^Fgte ^ tep^rary 12^^^ squ8dman;sir^the^ar1^3.;lt!sthecaseofthsip^ that their i remoyat tw Anfsxtire Mi Nthouts ^Kim ofpfinciplp!®S xifheari^is ofnaturaSN :he osers 3ettf'GOuld'iRot;|be.^i^'te:;|bg:t ,;^itihas:;te&h; ^IAcoontmgj1 ^i8^tR§tiCi6a?^yasaB^,f:1SSEsl|!!Eet: ll^ and'iear!|iied' Stste';cou®iSjy§^6liH'HN;:rthatittse;!pe8t| K fr» l4- '—:&'.""" appoirrtedon cla!!]?wage3s12sr©nth!ys(yjadEnananclwsrep3!d on Gollector tate. Their appointments vrere not made as a resutt of any proce^ of setection OT reeruitET®nt and as such ths petstiOTiers have no rght t& hotd the post, therefore, their termiRation or cKsengageineid is justified and they are not tls ;Iop any prior noticsi or hoUing any enquiry before termtnatffi@;theirservices (3) !n the matt^ of JWchal <^VS. M^ SR7C, f^^ SCG 449 arKl SsnwB^ ft^sad TiwaR^s. y^ JBa^^^^ MaiUlt Pan^iactf^, Othws, (20(^ 7 SCG 684 the "on'Ue ! ! Supreme Gourt^pis held^hatwhen a daily vVager QF tereporary employee is terrRinated^lSsrB s^k»on the greur^ of^^^^n^ availability of po^ or on: acGoynt of the ergageRient beji^ contraryto mles, n6 syportunBy of hearirig Is rteosssarybeoayse the person concemedttas no r^hf to hold the post. (4)!n the matterof Secnets^ State of^tenatata ahd Vs. ymaifew^ydRdo e(Sf^pe(rtetfni^2(K^4SCCli(hs®B$e heldthatapereonappQirtt?doriap6stdehorethecsMistitutfbrte scheme has np tega! F^htl& tiisild or continue on ttie p<sl. the petitiorieES, who have feilei to demonstrate ;that tti< appointmeht were made^ as a eonsequera^ Of any pr^ recruftment, do not have any right t& hotd the post and as si thsir t^TOination b^Aris^xtire FV1 does ?^ sufier from any ls iv^isftussed. (5)Theins ucK Sd/- PrashantKumarMishra Judge