IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Cr.Misc. NO. M 30845 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION 27.4.2009 Ashok Kumar ......PETITIONER VERSUS State of Punjab ......RESPONDENTS PRESENT: Mr.Sanjiv Pandey, Advocate Mr. PS Sidhu,Addl.A.G.Punjab Mr. Ms Sidhu, Advocate. M.M.S.BEDI,J. The petitioner is present in the court . He has submitted that Kuldip Kaur complainant is residing happily with him. Learned counsel for the complainant has pleaded ignorance about the complainant living happily with the petitioner. The investigating officer, present in the court, informs that the complainant had joined the petitioner pursuant to the interim order passed by this court. Without expression of any opinion on merits of the case, in view of the above circumstances, it does not appear to be a case of custodial interrogation. Accordingly, the petition is allowed and it is ordered that in case of arrest of the petitioner, he will be admitted to bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to the condition that he will appear before the investigating officer as and when required by the police and will not tamper with evidence or hamper the investigation at any stage. A further condition is imposed that the petitioner will not commit the similar offence of which he is accused of. In case of any such eventuality, the complainant/ prosecution will be at liberty to seek the cancellation of bail. April 27 ,2009 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE