n-1 mGtiCQUirrOECHHATTKGASHA^ WRTT PETmON (O No. 2202 of2009 w . .; ' PETmONERS : 1. Kuleshwar Prasad Sahu son of Shri Nakul Prasad Sahu, aged ahout 23 years, resident of yillage Mohda Post Tarbongi, Distriet Raipur Clihat&garh. 2. Pankaj Dasson of Shri S.N.Das, aged about 23 years, resident ofNear Old Pipe Factory, New Shanti Nagar, Raipur, Ghhattisgarh. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. Chhattisgarh Swanii Vivekanand Technical Umversity, Throughftie Registrar, North Park Avenue, Sector 8, Bhilai District Durg Chliattisgarh. 2. All India CouncB for Technical Education, Indu-a Gandhi Sports Complex, Indrap-astfaa Estate, NewDelhi. 3. Disha Itistitute of Matiagemeut and Technology, throu^i theDirector, Satya Vihar Coloiiy, Chandarkhuri, Raipur, Chhattisgarti. WEirPE'Il'nONUNDERAR.'nCUi; 226 QP1TIE GONSTmJIION OFBOIA SB: Efon'Ue Shrl Sattsh K. Agiuhutal. J. Eresent: Sllri Amrito Das, Advocate tor the petfltioners. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Advocate fortfaerespondMitNo. I. Ms. Shannila Sin^iai, Advocate forfhe respoadent No. 2. ORDER(ORALy (Passed oa 09th day of July, 2009) Heard. 1, Leamed counsel appearing for the respondeat No. 1 sutanits that nonnaUy, afler declaration of flie result, 1he answerme sheets are retained for a period -of six months and thereafter, the same are disposed of. However, as a speeial oase, ifthe answer siheets ofthe petitioner are available, the same shall be revalued aad fhe results wouldbe declared accardmglywithin reasonable time. % — In view of the above submissioa, accdrding to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners, Hbthmg survives m this mattw for adjudication. 3. Consequenfly, the writpetition stands disposedof. Amit Sd/- . Satish^Aga'hot" Judge