\ m » w _"Lakfa‘;‘ aged about 44 years, orkhiglg as Head Master x’ ' , ovt Nw Primar ‘ch‘§1,_ andkoa, Bloc aicil‘a; Dimstt’. Jashp C.G.)§, S a / Q mt. AnastasTi‘yfa Lkra W erman Lakra, aged abéu 1 yéars, Working as ea T.‘.,D rimary School, Sarnatoli, B? D. lock istt o ’) Jashur (C).;.GE. mt. {len‘siya aka, W/ reniy-us Lakfa, aged, abou A t 74,0 ears, working, as" Ha .W.D hoo loc— ‘Bagicha, District, Jashp astéf M, P Bgih, ’aCa aster, rma Bhk M Piry ursaona, Wm w , G, e y 'Tw. Soo Dip k Bg ur ( «V v H t 4 Hd w. Govt. S Elj Lr o 4 y od T‘_, Govt. Scl Bk A ur C) (.G. ni ai, S/oyMoh’ar Si, a aged bout 42 years, or a Head Master, -T. l )Govt. , Primary hl amunda, Bloek— a wk£ng s w.1D., Sco‘o Tp haar, Distt. Jashpur (C.G i ar Kujur, S/o Sri Ganjhu , aged about, 48 ears, Working as Head Jas C.G.) hpur ( x. Sm. Prsaxilpa Xaxa W/o r aiaax1 Xaxa, aged abo 2 years, working as Mter, T.W.D.7,Govt. rimary School, Baladar f ath, Block— bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS : 1 te o I Chhattisgarh Through :— The secretary, Tral lfare Department, .K.$. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) i ArLIdh S k Parsbh §) Vjaf Kum h? y t a Shi Jm ut 4 Head as P P / ; Sat f ib We D Master, T.W.D., Prirriary School Makgribandha, Block- Phatsaba‘har, Distt.~ Assistant Commissioner, ribal Welfare Department T , Distt. - ( r B r Jashur p Jas pur, C.G.) Block Education Officer, lock —Fasabahar D C) istt. Jashpur (.G. lock Eucation Officer, Block — Bagicha Dist§t. — Jashpur (C.G. a y Accoiunt 8L Pensio Jpur ( i ) Tresury Officer, Treasur n D u istt. —Jashpr ash, cg) i E RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA G\ @ B d W mm yb , a _ "111200 mm (Wu) Wmm WW‘§‘F€@W én‘a‘mm rivast§va, J. the petlitionersr $3 : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan Sf (32-07-2010 Shri Somkant Verma, caunsel for Shri Bhaskar Payashi, Panel Law advance copy. Heard the petitionere submrte that the Learned counsei appearing for petitioners are entitied to benefit of two advance increments on account of they having passed BT. i. Degree befcre their appointment‘at their own cost. It is submitted that the iesue i’nvclved in the present petition is no longer res integra and the same nae been finaiiy decided by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Ashe Sraxena vs; State of MP. & $13., 20% (tit) MPJR {SC} 59‘ it is further submitted that this Court has aiso taken a similar View in his order iyer for; the State/respondents on /‘aj // dated 06-02-2009 passed in W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. Learned counsei for the petitioners further draws attention of this Court to order dated 29-04-2010. passed in Writ Appeai No.124 of 2009, wherein relying upon the fudgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) and the order passed by this Court in another Writ Appeai how/2009, directions have been issued for consideration of the case for grant of two advance increments as per circuiar dated 21-09-1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification of the facts pieaded int 1e petition. Learned counsei for the respordents submits that case of the the same tines petitioners Wouid aiso be considered on Q- XLHc—78 A \ \ , ‘ w PS1 QJNV 3%,) K-3 m .Hi 200 311%“W (Wu) I I mmm «‘2, Wagwjwgmam 'ln View ”of ~the statement made above, éthis petition is Many disposed of with a direction tG the respo 1dent auttjorities to consider and ‘th‘e‘ daim 0f the petitioners for gr nt of two é‘dvance increments as ‘oate‘d 21—09-1974 issued b the State of Madhya Pradesh, “ of the facts pleaded in t ‘ e petition :within a period of eight weeks from“to&ay‘ . V ‘ ¢ \ Tumane WManindra Mohan $hriva‘stav * ‘ judge Wi” W “ ) é h