IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.442 of 2011 DILIP KUMAR PANDEY, son of Jaya Nand Pandey Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 04.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No.461 of 2010 registered under Sections 409, 120B of the I.P.C. It would appear from perusal of the record that Najir of District Planning Section, Jehanabad planted a story of loot of Government money. But, when he reported the above stated so-called story of loot, police doubted and subsequently the so- called looted amount was recovered from the house of aforesaid Najir, namely, Uday Kumar. Furthermore, the aforesaid Najir disclosed that this petitioner had also entered into the above stated conspiracy, and subsequently, Rs.2400/- was recovered from the house of the petitioner. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner used 2 to do the daily work of the aforesaid Najir on contract basis and so far as the recovery of Rs.2400/- is concerned, the same had been paid by the aforesaid Najir to do his daily work. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties petitioner, namely, DILIP KUMAR PANDEY is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of Sri Afjal Alam, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Jehanabad in connection with above stated Jehanabad P.S. Case No.461 of 2010. PN ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)