THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NOs.2413, 2436 AND 2470 OF 2010 COMMON ORDER: C.R.P.No.2413 of 2010, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order, dated 19.04.2010 in I.A.No.19 of 2010 in O.S.No.1574 of 2006 on the file of the Additional Judge, City Small Causes Court-cum-VI Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, whereunder and whereby, the application filed under Order XVI Rules 1, 5 and 6 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘CPC’), to issue summons to the Corporation Bank, S.R.Nagar, Hyderabad, to produce records pertaining to clearing of the Cheque bearing No.349325 for Rs.31,330/- and to give details as to in which account the said cheque was cleared, was dismissed. 2. C.R.P.No.2470 of 2010, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order, dated 19.04.2010 in I.A.No.20 of 2010 in O.S.No.1574 of 2006 on the file of the Additional Judge, City Small Causes Court-cum-VI Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, whereunder and whereby, the application filed under Order XVI Rules 1, 5 and 6 read with Section 151 CPC to issue summons to the A.P. Vardhaman Mahila Co-operative Urban Bank Limited, Ameerpet, Hyderabad, to produce the records relating to cheque Nos.206932, 206945, 212657, 212668, 212675, 349305 and 349311 and other details, was dismissed. 3. C.R.P.No.2436 of 2010, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order, dated 19.04.2010 in I.A.No.18 of 2010 in O.S.No.1574 of 2006 on the file of the Additional Judge, City Small Causes Court-cum-VI Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, whereunder and whereby, the application filed under Section 151 CPC to reopen the petitioners evidence, was dismissed in view of the orders passed in I.A.Nos.19 and 20 of 2010. 4. Since all the revisions are connected to each other, they are being taken up for disposal together. 5. The Petitioners herein are the defendants and the respondent herein is the plaintiff in the suit. The suit is filed for recovery of money. In the said suit evidence on both sides was over, and arguments on plaintiff side was also over and when the suit was coming up for arguments on defendants’ side, the present Interlocutory applications were filed, which were dismissed vide impugned orders. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that petitioner No.3 herein issued the said cheques to the respondent and the same were encashed by him; that unless the Manager of A.P. Vardhaman Mahila Cooperative Urban Bank Limited, Ameerpet, Hyderabad, and the Manager, Corporation Bank, S.R.Nagar, Hyderabad, are summoned, it is difficult to establish about the encashment of the cheques and hence, he prays to set aside the impugned orders. 7. None appears for the respondent, in spite of service of notice. 8. As seen from the impugned orders, similar applications seem to have been filed by the petitioners before the trial Court for the self same relief and the same were dismissed for default. No plea has been taken in the written statement with regard to the cheques in question. In the absence of any pleading, any amount of evidence is valueless. The suit is coming up for argument. At this stage, the present applications are filed to drag on the proceedings. Therefore, the trial Court rightly dismissed the petitions and there are no grounds to interfere with the impugned orders. 9. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ K.C.BHANU, J MARCH 24, 2011. YVL IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NOs.2413, 2436 AND 2470 OF 2010 Between : K.Madhusudhan Rao and others. .... PETITIONERS A N D S.V.Ramana Murthy …RESPONDENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NOs.2413, 2436 AND 2470 OF 2010 24.03.2011