IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.17027 of 2009 Between: K.Gavi Siddanna Goud ..... PETITIONER AND Rayadurgam Municipality, Anantapur, Anantapur District, rep.by its Commissioner and others .....RESPONDENTS ORDER: The petitioner filed the present writ petition for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the petitioner herein prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not taking action on the petitioner representation given to the respondents in closing the road which leads to the petitioner agricultural land to an extent of Acs.4.81 in Survey No.189 C/B of Rayadurgam Village and Mandal, Anantapur District is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently, direct the respondents not to close the road which leads to the petitioner agricultural land to an extent of Acs.4.81 in Survey No.189 C/B of Rayadurgam Village and Mandal, Anantapur District” When the matter is taken up consideration, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the first respondent-Rayadurgam Municipality produced written instructions, wherein it is stated as under: “I invite your kind attention to the reference cited above that the Municipality has not closed the way, the road and the pathway which leads to survey Nos.143/B, 33A, 34A, 44, 45, 46 and 47 under partition of 04.81 cents in survey No.189/C/B. Even though the survey No.86 of Rayadurgam was acquired for Indiramma Housing colony the road or the parthway of the petitioner was not closed by the respondents. The boundaries of the said complainant is as it is in the said survey number and not caused any damage or any obstruction to the complainant’s property.” In view of the stand taken by the first respondent that the road/pathway leading to the subject agricultural lands of the petitioner was not closed, no further adjudication is necessary in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date:08.09.2009 VGB