§x§4us~.. gazg‘mg’? ql/ \ (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER Block - Arang, Distt. - Raipur‘(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22/6 OF THE Yodhan Singh Dewangan S/o Shri Gendlal Dewangan Age about 4O years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Paloud, Block - Arang, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through :- Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Director, Directorate of Public Instruction, Pensionbada, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer District Education Office, Distt. — Raipur (C.G.) Block Education Officer WRIT PETITION (S) NO. $8 9 [2007 f%eez@% / to?) CONSTITUTION OF INDIA /'*"‘\-v HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HCN’BLE MR, SATISH K. AQNIHQTN, ,1. WRIT PETITION IS.) NO. 389 OF 2007 Yddhan singh Dewangan sate of Chhaitisgarh and oihars And WRIT PETITION (5.) NO. 390 OF 2007 Petitioner : Manohar Lal Chandtakar VgfSLIS Respondents : State of Chhauisgath and others Pr¢sent : Mr. Rakesh Anthony. counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel lawyerfor the State! respondents. ORDER I (Passed on 23m Day of January. 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the pewonere as also for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petitionsvare squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another' . 2.\ in subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (8.) No.5862 of 2006 (Hemant Kumar Vishwakanna vs. State of chhawsgom and others) and other connected matters, decided by this Court on 12-3 2- 2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28-1 4995. issued by the Secretary. Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Diploma in Education Examination, it was clarihed that me nomenclature of the Basic Training Institute, i.e.. B.T.l. has been changed and renamed as , Diploma in Education, i.e.. D.Ed. Accordingw. the D.Ed. Certiticate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (3.) No.5862 of 2006 (Hemant Kumar Vishwakarma vs. State of Chhaflisgarh and others) (supra). 3. For the aforementioned reasons, these writ petitions are disposed of in tenns of the decision of this Court in the matter of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj (Supra). subject to veriticadon of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired D.Ed. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-1 2-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to cos$. 4. A copy of this order be placed on reoord in other oonnected writ petition. Satish K. Agnihotri i Judge Sd/— Bablu "// 1 2006 (ll) MPJR-OG W