1 C y, f @L Single Bench I_n the Honble High Court 0_fChhattishg_21rh a_t Bilaspur (C.G.) WP No. Azwm 2006 Petltloner {geld a Loknath Bhard1ya aged 48 years son of/ J, Shr1 Udalram Bhardlya As31stant Teacher, y,J\ \Durg, Primary Tahsil School, & district,Durg. Kuthrel, VERSUS 1. The State Government of Chhattishgarh,/ Through the Secretary, Education Department D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Block Education Officer” Durg (CG) Writ petition under articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ in the nature of MANDAMUS Certiorari, Respondent *1 Prohibition and other suitable WRIT or writs, Order or orders, Direction or directions HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA SPUR w. P. (s) No. 4948 of 2006 Pe'rifioner : Lokna'th Bhurdiya l/ Versus T Respondents 1 3mm Elm/1'. of Chhcti’isgur-h & ofhers 5ing!¢ Bench: Hen‘b!e Mr. Justice Sa‘rish K. Agniha‘m. Shri Ajay Shrivasmva, ,Advooafe for “the Pe‘ri‘rioner. Smt Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt Advocafe for the respondenTs/S‘mfe. O R D E R (11m September, 2006) 1. lmmed counsel appearing for 'rhe pefi‘fioner submi‘l’s fhaf while working as Assis-ram Teacher, 'rhe pe-ri'rioner has gone on mining +5 improve his’ quoiificai’ions on his own expenses and acquired B. Ed. Examina'iion Cerfifioafe on 14.7.1992 from Barkafullnh University, Bhopal. 2‘ According ‘i'o learned counsel for fhe pe'ri‘tioner, fhe pe‘fi‘l’ioner is enfii'led ‘i'o mo advance increments in view of fhe decision of This Courf in The case of Yashwanf Kumar Sharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corpora'rion, Durg and anofher {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}. This Cour-f in The case of Yashwanf Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corpora'iion, burg and anofher (Supm), came To the conclusion the? the feacher‘s, who had obtained B. Ed. o ( 2 / 3 Examimiion Cer+ifimfe on his own expenses, are covered by the circular- duted 24.12.98 (Annexure P/2) issued by fhe Sfu'te Governmzn'r of Mndhya Pradesh Learned counsel for fhe pz'ri'rioner' further submi‘rs ‘H’m’ ‘rhe facts and quesfion of law involved in The presen‘r case are squarely covered by decision of 'rhis Cour+ in fhe cnse of Yashwan'!’ Kumar Bhamdwaj Vs. Municipa! Corpamfion, Durg and anoiher (Supra), to which ienrned counsel appearing for fhe respondenfs fairly concedes and agrees wii‘h fhe overmen'r made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Accordingly, the wrif pefi‘rion is allowed in ierms of fhe order passed in +he case of Yoshwanf Kumor Bhamdwaj Vs. Municipal Corpora'rion, Durg and ano‘i’her (Supra), subjeci' ‘l'o verifica‘rion of fhe foe? as To whether ‘Hwe pe‘l’ifioner has acquired B. Edi Examina‘i’ion Cerfificafe on his own expenses or not No order as To costs. WW Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotr Judge i