IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18369 of 2010 1. SUGIYA DEVI 2. SUNAINA DEVI 3. BIPIN BHARATI 4. MANOJ BHARATI -------------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.22413 of 2010 AWADHESH BHARATI ------------- PETITIONER Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 30.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Allegation is about demand of a motorcycle in dowry and torture for its non- fulfilment followed by killing the informant’s daughter. Petitioners’ defence is that no demand ever was made rather petitioners come from a BPL card holder family. Demand of motorcycle on their behalf can never be believed. On the other hand, their defence is that the deceased was suffering from ailment. She was being properly provided medical treatment but could not be saved. The doctor under whose treatment she was, is examined even under section 164 Cr.P.C. clearly states about the treatment of the deceased referring to PMCH. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of 2 arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah in Bettiah Mufassil P.S. Case No. 289/2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)