IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. LPA No.606/2009(O&M) Date of Decision: 30.7.2009. M/s GlaxoSmithkline Consumer Healthcare Ltd. ..........Appellant Versus Punjab State Electricity Board and others. ..........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH. Present: Mr.Puneet Jindal,Advocate for the appellant. Mr.Salil Sagar,Senior Advocate with Mr.Samrath Sagar,Advocate for respondents 1,3 and 4. Mr.Samrath Sagar,Advoate for respondentno.2. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement ? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? M.M.KUMAR,J. This appeal filed under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent Act is directed against the order dated 27.4.2009 passed by the learned single Judge of this Court in CWP No.8451 of 2007 titled as M/s Antarctic Industries and others v. Punjab State Electricity Board and others. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant has read out to us the averment made in para 22 of the writ petition along with Annexure P-7 as well the corresponding para of written statement to develop an argument that the appellant-petitioner never exceeded the limit of 2500 KV of LPA No.606/2009(O&M) 2 electricity which could have attracted the levy of surcharge. Learned counsel has also read out the maximum demand recorded in KVA during the year 2004 which according to the learned counsel has been obtained from the bills pertaining to the years 2004,2005,2006,2007 and 2008. When we confronted the learned counsel for the appellant that no such argument was raised before the learned single Judge, he has apprised the Court that request was made for hearing the different petitions separately but the bunch of petitions was disposed of by one single order. According to the learned counsel consequently no separate argument could be raised and the arguments remained confined to the other petitions. He has prayed that the appellant-petitioner may be granted liberty to seek review of order dated 27.4.2009 passed by the learned single Judge and the appeal be dismissed as withdrawn. In view of the above the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the appellant-petitioner to file an application for review. (M.M.Kumar) Judge 30.7.2009 (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge LPA No.606/2009(O&M) 3