CR No.2659 of 2010 Rakesh Kumar Verma & Another Vs. Satwinder Singh Present:- Mr.Gaurav Chopra, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Gurcharan Dass, Advocate for the respondent. **** As a preliminary objection, learned counsel for the respondent has relied upon Babu Lal Vs. Raj Kumar & Ors., 1996 (1) Civil Court Cases 713 and N.S.S.. Narayana Sarma & Ors. Vs. M/s Goldstone Exports (P) Ltd. & Ors., 2002(1) Civil Court Cases 241, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that in a matter of execution of a decree for possession any order passed on any claim of third party would be an appealable order since it would be treated as decree under Order 21 Rule 103. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to deny the applicability of these judgments. Consequently, this petition is dismissed as being not maintainable. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE April 26, 2010 sukhpreet