IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 684 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 22 OF 2002 SMT.MUKTABAI V.KAMAT & ORS. ... Applicant Versus M/S JANARDHAN G.THALY & CO. & ORS. ... Respondent Shri. J. A. Lobo, Advocate for the applicants. Mr.sudin Usgaonkar,Advocate for respondent nos.3 & 4. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 11th October, 2010 P.C. Heard Mr. J. Lobo, learned Counsel for the applicants and Mr. Sudin Usgaonkar, learned Counsel for respondent nos. 3 and 4. 2. This is an application for speaking to minutes and for recalling of the order dated 27.9.2010. On 27.9.2010, Mr. M. B. D'Costa, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants made a statement that appellant no.1 had expired and he will take appropriate steps in the matter. According to Mr. J. Lobo, the said statement was made on account of communication gap but the same was made bonafide. According to Mr. Lobo, appellant no.1 has not expired. Therefore, the Order dated 27.9.2010 is re-called. 3. The Application stands disposed of. A. P. LAVANDE, J. vn