IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CWP No. 238 of 2005 Date of decision: August 17, 2009 Prem Sharma and others ........ Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .........Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice J S Khehar Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. M L Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners Ms Palika Monga, DAG, Haryana for the State- respondent No. 1 Mr. Arun Walia, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 4 -.- J S Khehar , J. (Oral) Short affidavit of the Land Acquisition Collector filed in Court today, is taken on record. Based on the affidavit of the Land Acquisition Collector, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 states, that the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous on account of the fact, that the land of the petitioners, which had earlier been acquired, has since been released from the acquisition. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for respondent No. 1, learned counsel for the petitioners acknowledges, that the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (J S Khehar) Judge (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge August 17, 2009 mohan