IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 682 of 1988 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- TRIKAMLAL HIRALAL SHAH HEIRS OF BHURABHAI HIRALAL SHAH Versus RAMESHCHANDRA SANKALCHAND SHAH -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Civil Revision Application No. 682 of 1988 MR RJ OZA for Petitioner No. 1-2 NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 1 MR KV SHELAT for Respondent No. 2-2/3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR Date of decision: 06/02/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT Mr.Oza, learned advocate for the petitioners state that since the petitioners, who are the original defendants in the suit, have already purchased the suit premises, this revision has become infructuous. In that view of the matter, this Civil Revision Application is disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged. Interim relief granted earlier stands vacated. (P.B.Majmudar,J.) /malek