MS&S^ ySSSK^SS INT3!E HIGH CQURTOF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR W.P. No. 6133 of 2005 , SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICES.R.NAYAK, C.J. PETITIONER -/- ''^ . • ../„-- Gauesh Ram Lahare S/o Shri Bachchu Ram., agedabout 32 years, R/o Kota Dabari Champa, District Jaajgir Chainpa (C.G.), VERSUS RESPONDENTS .:r'~.- ^ State of Ghhattisgarh, through: The Secretary, Adiui Jati Kalyau Vibhag, DKS Bhawau Raipur (C.G.). The Managuig Director, Chltatdsgarh State An1yavasa3d Sahakari Vikas Avani Vitt Nigaru, Sector-5,Block-9 Devendra Nagar, Raipur, DistrictRaipur(C.G.). The CoUector, Jaajgu- Chanipa, District-Jaujgir Champa (C.G.). The Dista~ict Antyavasayi Sahakan Vikas Sainiti Maiyadit, Brauch Janjgir, District-Jaujgir Chaiapa (C.G.) Sub Divisioual OfiBcer, (Revenue) Champa, District Jaiijgir Chnmpa (C.G.). Mr. Rakesh Paudey, counsel &r fh.e petitioner. Mr. Ufkarsh Venna, Pauel lawyer for the respondents/State. ^ ORAL ORDER (9th December, 2005) There is au error apparent on the face of fhe order of fhe District CoUector impugned in. this Writ Petition. It is quite apparent fhat the District CoUector has passed fhe unpugned order without issuiag notice to the petitioner, aiid without givin; opportuiuly ofbeiag heard to him. Affected should be appraised is a constitutional creed flowiag fi-oia Article 14 postulates. There is a flagraat violation of principles of natural justice aad the impugned order, ftLerefore, camiot be sustauied. In the result, the impugafid order is quashed$ However, this order shall not coine in fhe way ofthe CoUector froiii taking appropriate action agatast the petitioner after giviug him an. opportunily ofbetag heard. Accordiagly, fhe Writ Petitioii is aUowed. No costs. Sd/- ChiefJusttce ^S^i^Sl