IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 608 OF 1983. NO. 608 OF 1983. NO. 608 OF 1983. Mewar Oil & General Mills Ltd. ... Plaintiff. V/s. Union of India and others. ... Defendants. None for the plaintiff. Ms.J.N.Pandhi i/b. S.I.Shah for the defendants. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. V.C.DAGA, J. V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 13th January 2006. 13th January 2006. 13th January 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . On 9th December, 2005, advocate of the plaintiff - Mr.Rajesh Shah had reiterated no instructions from the plaintiff. By way of good gesture fresh notice was directed to be issued to the plaintiff. The notice could not be served since the address given is not a correct address. The plaintiff has not bothered to give his fresh registered address. With the result, it is not possible to serve fresh notice on the plaintiff. The advocate appearing for the plaintiff has not been granted any discharge. Consequently, it was obligatory on his part to appear on behalf of the plaintiff. Since nobody is appearing on behalf of the plaintiff, I have no option but to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution. . In the result, suit is dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. *****