CWP No. 1427 of 2008. 20.08.2008 Present: Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 4. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that on the direction of the Deputy Commissioner the Sub Divisional Officer (Civil) was called upon to enquire into the fact whether the petitioner possessed Maruti car. Though the report is against the petitioner, but she has not been given an opportunity to be heard by the Sub Divisional Officer. At the time of hearing before this Court learned Counsel for the petitioner admits that the petitioner had purchased Maruti car, but on subsequent date it was sold. In the light of above admission, the petitioner was not eligible to be appointed as Anganwadi Worker. Therefore, no interference is warranted in this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, so also the pending applications. (Jagdish Bhalla), C.J. August 20, 2008. ( Kuldip Singh ), J. (rc)