1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVN. APPLICATION NO. 506 OF 2009 Shrirang Kisanrao @ Krishnath Shinde & anr. ... Applicants (Ori. Defendants) v/s Arun Gangaram Panadi ... Respondent (Ori. Plaintiff) Mrs.Jayashri Akolkar for the applicants. Mr.S.M.Gorwadkar for the respondent. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 9TH NOVEMBER, 2009 P.C.: 1. The applicants have approached this Court against the concurrent findings of fact arrived at by both the Courts below. The Courts have held that the defendants i.e. the applicants herein, are in arrears of rent and have thus committed default. The Courts have held that the landlords bonafide required the suit premises. Besides that, the Courts have considered that if the decree is not passed the plaintiff 2 would be caused more hardship than that which would be caused to the defendants/tenants. The Courts have also considered the fact that the tenants have an alternate accommodation and, therefore, have decreed the suit. 2. In my opinion, there is no need to interfere since both the Courts below have considered the contentions of the parties, the evidence on record and have arrived at concurrent findings of fact. 3. Civil revision application dismissed. ..... 3