IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22196 of 2010 SUDHIR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 08.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 10.2.2010 in a case registered under Section 364(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. There is allegation that the petitioner had kidnapped 9 years old son of the informant and subsequently Rs. 5 lakh ransom was demanded. Initially the informant raised suspicion against four F.I.R named accused persons with whom the informant had land dispute. It is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. No witness claims to have seen the occurrence and petitioner name sprang up on confession of co-accused. Moreover, the friend of the victim has not raised any suspicion against the petitioner and they have given the date of occurrence as 7.11.2009 whereas the informant has given the date as 4.11.2009. It is submitted that the petitioner is involved in one other case under the Arms Act . 2 Learned counsel for the State Mr. Mehta submits that the petitioner name sprang up in the confession of the co-accused. Considering the fact that the petitioner is the co-villagers and if any doubt would had been in the mind of the informant then the informant might had named the petitioner in the F.I.R. and the fact that the petitioner’s name sprang up during confession of the co-accused, let the petitioner, namely, Sudhir Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisrai, in connection with Lakhisrai P.S. Case No. 565 of 2009. Anand Kr. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)