IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14692 of 2010 MANTUN YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.5.2010 Heard. The case is under Section 392 of the Penal Code and the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner transpired in the confessional statement of co-accused Sakaldeo Singh and after about a year of the occurrence two employees of the Plant where the robbery was committed indicated that the petitioner was found roaming around them. The petitioner has not been put on the T.I. Parade in spite of being in custody since 19.1.2010. Under the above facts and circumstances, let the petitioner Mantu Yadav be released from custody on furnishing a bond of Rs. 5,000/-( five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in Singhaul(Muffasil) P.S.Case No. 15 of 2009. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)