IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 22560 of 2002 Between: M. Sadashiva Rao s/o Hanumantha rao R/o Bodhan, Nizamabad District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 the Commissioner for Prohibition and Excise Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad 2 the Deputy commissioner for Prohibition and Excise Nizamabad 3 The Prohibition and Excise superintenden Nizamabad .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the order of the 1st respondnet passed in Cr. No. 15012/2002/CPC/G4 dated 21-10-2002 and 29-10-2002 as illegal arbitrary and consequently direct the respondnets to permit the petitioner to conduct the business Counsel for the Petitioner:SMT.G.JHANSI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PROHIBITION The Court made the following : ORDER: The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the subject of the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. Date:21.04.2008 Ccm To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{ }