IN THB HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH JUDICATURB AT BILASPUR W.P. ( S) No. /2011 PETITIONER: .."S^Ja£3^ •1.1" ,^» .^-^^ ?^n^Sl ^ '••-,?, RBSPONDBNTS: ^>\wf i^w'/ ^w' C-T ^y/ -<^'' -<?"" ••'' ^y iSr' Sudesh Kum.ar Patel S/o Shri Ramakant Patel Aged about 42 years Occupation -Driver Office ofChiefMedical and Heatth Officer Dantewada Dist-Dantewada (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through, Secretary , Department of Health and Family Welfare Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, RaipurfC.G.) 2. Collector , Dantewada Dist-Dantewada (C.G.) 3. Chief medical and Health Officer ,Dantewada Dist -Dantewada (C. G.) ~7 WRIT PETJTION UNDER ARTZCLE 226/227 QP THE CONSTITUTION OF INDJA IftpjS A:nit iiBBa HIO-H COIJRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BITASPIJR WMT PETITION ('S) No. 5707 of2011 Sudesh Kumar Patel. RESPONDENTS WMT PETmON LJNDER -ARnCLE 226/227 OF THE State ofChhattisearh & C^thers f\f7 r\-Tr^T A \Jl^ Aj-^X/lA SB: Present: Ms. Deepali Pandey, Advocate fbrthe netitioner. Slm Ania Sao, Govsiiu'netit Auvoeate fos" the State/respoadeiits ORRKR (Passed on 23r" day ofSeptember, 2011) 1. L^amed counsel appearing for the pe'titioner submits thaf vide order dated 29.07.2011 (Aanexiire P/I), the petifioHer, workins as Driver in fhe offiee of Chief Medical & Health Officer. 'antewada, ha-s been transferred to the oliice of Chief Medieal & Health Cfficer. Kabirdl'iam. oa his OWB exr'enses. However. the petitioner has not yet been relieved to joia the aew place of posting. Ms. Pandey fiirther submits that oace the order oftransfer has been passed, it is for the govemment to ensure that it is complied with immediately. She reiies on a ctecisioa of the Supreme Court in Sreedcim Chandra Ghosh v. State ofAssam & ^tit^'yv in <:'!'!'rist^^r^" {\'¥ \^T5. c'.csyv^e:!''r^\t\n tl^i5+ ^ +?^?1 r^'Tr^^T* ic; ?^f^+ *A£^*l- 12, ^S3L^V ^/"i ^?-TVA AtJ Ai.v/^ comolied wifh. a direct.ion can be issued for enforcemeat thereof. 2. Leamed eounsel appearing for the Stata/respondents snbmits that that ifthe traasfer ord$r dated 15.07.2010 ('Aanexi.ire p/'l) is still ia exist.ence and has not been complied with, a.Dorooriate steos would be taken to comply with tlie order. 3. Ifthe aforesaid transfer order is stili in existence. the governnieut is.under an obligation to comply with the same at once. It is la.ccordingly directed that the transfer order shall be compiied with fbrthwith. within a oeriod oftwo weetcs. 4. Accordmglv. this oetition is disoosed of _--.—'~ Satisb'^.A®0"104" Judge (1S96)1QSCC567