IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.225 of 2007 Md. Islam, son of Late Md. Hussain, resident of Village Meghapur Tola Bhura Khop, Police Station Amdanda, District- Bhagalpur ------- Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary Land Reforms Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2. Sk. Rafique 3. Sk. Badruddin 4. Sk. Mansur, all three sons of late Amanat, resident of Village Bhura Khap, Police Station- Amdanda, Distt. Bhagapur. 5. The Collector, Bhagalpur 6. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Kahalgaon, Distt. Bhagalpur 7. The Circle Officer, Kahalgaon, Block, Dist. Bhagalpur ---- Respondents. --------- 2. 6.1.2009 Heard Mr. Mithilesh Mowar for the petitioner, and Mr. Pawan Kumar, learned Junior Counsel to Government Pleader No.14 for respondent nos. 1, 5 to 7. None appears on behalf of respondent nos. 2 to 4. We do not feel the necessity of issuing notices to respondent nos. 2 to 4 in view of the nature of the order that we are going to pass. It arises out of mutation proceeding and is with respect to new Khata No.5, Khesra Nos.157, 158, 159,160, 161, 162, 163 and 166, area 1 acres and 15 decimals in Mauza Bathani, Thana No.452, P.S. Conhoula, District-Bhagalpur. Certain order was passed by the learned first authority with respect to the mutation of the lands in question. Aggrieved by the same, respondent no.2 (Sk. Rafique) preferred an appeal which was allowed by order dated 10.11.2004 (Annexure-6), passed by the learned Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Kahalgaon, in Jamabandi Case No. 7/04-05( Sk. Rafique 2 2 Vrs. Md. Ishlam), whereby the appeal was allowed, the order of the learned Anchal Adhikari was set aside, and it was directed that the lands in question may be mutated in the name of respondent no.2 herein. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner herein preferred revision application which was rejected by order dated 2.1.2006 (Annexure-7),and the said order dated 10.11.2004 has been up-held. It appears to me that the learned first authority exhaustively considered the relevant aspects of the matter, and upheld by the learned appellate authority as well as the learned revisional authority. In view of the reasons assigned in those orders, I am not inclined to interfere with the same. I do not find any merit in this writ petition and is accordingly dismissed. It goes without saying that it will be open to the aggrieved parties to institute a civil suit in the court of competent jurisdiction for redressal of his grievances. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar , J.)