THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA Writ Petition No. 13808 of 2006 Dated: 07.07.2006 Between: Smt. Tharabai, D/o Mallaiah, D.W. Conductor (E-850773), APSRTC, Adilabad Region, Adilabad District, A.P. …… Petitioner And The Regional Manager, APSRTC, Adilabad Region, Adilabad District. …… Respondent THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA Writ Petition No. 13808 of 2006 Oral Order: The proceedings, dated 09.01.2006, deleting the name of the petitioner from the panel of daily wage conductors of Adilabad region, are under challenge in this writ petition. The petitioner is employed in the respondent-Corporation as Conductor on daily wage basis in Adilabad region. While so, she was transferred to Mancherial depot vide proceedings dated 13.07.2005. The petitioner states that due to certain difficulties she could not join the transferred place. She was issued with a show cause notice dated 20.12.2005 and ultimately her name was deleted from the panel of daily wage employees. Hence, the present writ petition. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the petitioner being a lady conductor, due to certain difficulties could not join the duty at Mancherial and the authorities without affording reasonable opportunity have resorted to delete her name from the panel of daily wage conductors. It is further submitted that the issue raised in this writ petition is squarely covered by the orders of this Court in W.P. No. 1858 of 2006 dated 01.02.2006. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-Corporation admitted the same. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-Corporation. The issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the orders of this Court in W.P. 1858 of 2006, dated 01.02.2006. The operative portion of the said order, reads as under: “Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is allowed and the impugned order is hereby set aside. The names of the petitioners shall be continued in the panel of select conductors and the entrustment of the duties to the petitioners shall depend upon the availability of work on the concerned day. However, if the transfer becomes inevitable, the petitioners shall be given the option, to choose the places of their choice within the region.” Hence, following the orders of this Court in W.P. No. 1858 of 2006 dated 01.02.2006, the present writ petition is allowed and the impugned order dated 09.01.2006 is hereby set aside. The name of the petitioner shall be continued in the panel of select conductors and entrustment of the duties to the petitioner shall depend upon the availability of work on the concerned day. However, if the transfer becomes inevitable, the petitioner shall be given the option to choose the place of her choice within the region. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 07.07.2006 Nsr/Ksr