IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 250 of 2009 Dr. Darpan Singh Nabiyal …..…… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ....……… Respondents Coram:- Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Present: Mr. B.N.Molakhi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.C. Bisht, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. None for respondent No.3. Mr. S.P.S. Panwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. H.C. Pathak, Advocate for respondent No.4. Date of Decision: 17.05.2010 J.S. Khehar, C.J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states, that the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous since the petitioner has already been relieved for joining in the State of Uttar Pradesh. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 17.05.2010 P. Singh