1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.2/2007 IN COMPANY APPLICATION NO.954/2007 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.369/2003 Mahendra Lavjibhai Parmar Petitioner Vs. The Official Liquidator ,High Court. Respondents Bombay Mr.V.M.Bhardwaj for the petitioner Mr.S.Ramakantha,Dy.O.L. Mr.C.N.Mehta for the applicant in C.A.no.954/07 CORAM: S.J.VAZIFDAR,J. DATE : 29th January,2009. P.C. 1] The petitioner alleged that the Official Liquidator committed contempt of the order of this Court dated 6th September, 2007 by not having taken possession of the property . 2] In fact the Official Liquidator had called a meeting on 17th November,2007 to decide the modalities for taking possession .At the meeting the question of the necessary points for the purpose of implementing the order was discussed. The meeting was thereafter postponed to 22nd November,2007. The secured creditors did not attend the meeting.The petitioners stated that they would not be able 2 to pay the expenses for security. 3] In these circumstances the Official Liquidator cannot be faulted for not having implemented the order. However,the Official Liquidator ought to have made an application before the Company Court for directions after notice to the parties. 4] In the circumstances the Contempt Petition is dismissed. 5] However,the Official Liquidator shall file an appropriate report seeking directions regarding implementation of the order dated 6th September,2007 after notice to all the parties.