IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST OCTOBER 2009 / 29TH ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 29732 of 2009(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ MOLLY.C.P., SPECIAL VILLAGE OFFICER, VILLAGE OFFICE, MUVATTUPUZHA, RESIDING AT POOVATHINKAL HOUSE, MADAKATHANAM POST, KAPPU, ERNAKULAM-686 670. BY ADV. SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE COMMISSIONER FOR LAND REVENUE PUBLIC OFFICE BUILDING, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-33. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.NANDAKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 29732 OF 2009 (J) ===================== Dated this the 21st day of October, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is a Village Assistant. The grievance in the writ petition is that in the matter of promotion, she was overlooked for the reason that her declaration of probation was delayed, which was for the reason that the petitioner did not pass chain survey certificate test. According to the petitioner, the delay occurred mainly for the reason that she was deputed for training only belatedly. It is also her case that several others who are not possessing the said test qualification have been given promotion. Petitioner also relies on the judgment of this Court in WA No.155/81 and Ext.P11, and it is stated that considering circumstances similar to that of the petitioner, promotion has been preponed. It is stated that urging her claim for preponding the promotion in the aforesaid background, she has filed Ext.P12 before the 2nd respondent and petitioner prays that the 2nd respondent may be directed to consider Ext.P12 and pass orders thereon. 2. In the facts as stated above and having regard to the WPC 29732/09 :2 : pendency of Ext.P12, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on the said representation. This shall be done within 8 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp