IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH JANUARY 2010 / 7TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 36077 of 2009(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- A.IBRAHIM, S/O. LATE ABDULLA, ALIKKANTAVIDAY HOUSE, VADAKARA AMSOM DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.V.V.ASOKAN SRI.P.P.RAMACHANDRAN RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. PASSPORT OFFICER, PASSPORT OFFICE, BYEPASS ROAD, ERANHIPALAM P.O., KOZHIKODE-673 006. 2. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI, REPRESENTED BY ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. ADV. SRI.T.P.M.IBRAHIM KHAN,ASST.S.G OF INDI FOR R1-2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 36077 of 2009(D) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXHIBIT P1 : Order in Crl.M.C.No.2026/2009 by this Hon'ble Court EXHIBIT P2 : First page of the passport of the petitioner. EXHIBIT P3: 19th page of the passport. EXHIBIT P4 : Receipt issued in favour of the petitioner by the 1st respondent. EXHIBIT P5 : Communication received by the petitioner from the 1st respondent EXHIBIT P6 : Reply given to the 1st respondent EXHIBIT P7 : Communication received by the petitioner with endorsement by the 1st respondent. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : Nil T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.36077 of 2009 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 27th day of January, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner is the holder of a valid Indian Passport having No.A7886783 issued on 27.6.1999 by the first respondent. For renewing the passport he approached the first respondent. The first respondent cancelled the passport and returned without renewing it and aggrieved by the same, this writ petition has been filed. 2. It is revealed from the averments in the writ petition itself that petitioner was involved in Crime No.230 of 2009 registered by Badagara Police Station. The matter had been considered by this Court in Criminal M.C.No.2026 of 2009 wherein by Exhibit P1 order various directions have been issued. 3. The learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the petitioner has not complied with the conditions imposed by this court in Exhibit P1 and therefore the passport was not renewed. In the light of the above the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that directions may be issued to the respondents to consider the matter in accordance with law if the petitioner complies with the conditions in Exhibit P1. When the W.P.(C)No.36077 of 2009 2 case came up for hearing on the last occasion, this Court had called for a report from the trial Court. It is evident from the report thus forwarded that the petitioner has not complied with the conditions provided in Exhibit P1 order, so far. C.M.P.3917/09 filed by him before that court stands dismissed. If the petitioner satisfies the conditions imposed by this Court in Exhibit P1, it will be open to the respondent to consider the application for renewal of the passport. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE skj