1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR. W.P.NO.472 OF 2009. Yashwant Ramrao Babar ..vs..Additional Collector, Amravati and ors. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. Coram: C.L.PANGARKAR,J. Dated : 27th APRIL, 2009. 1. Heard Mr.A.V.Gawande, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. This writ petition has been preferred by the original non- applicant/tenant against the order passed by the Additional Collector i.e. an appellate authority i.e. C.P and Berar Rent Control Order, 1949. 3. The respondents had filed an application for grant of permission to 2 determine the tenancy of the appellant. The said application was heard by the Rent Controller and the Rent Controller granted permission to the respondent/landlord. After the said permission was granted, the respondent/landlord issued a notice of termination of tenancy to the petitioner. The petitioner thereafter preferred an appeal before the Additional Collector. The said appeal also came to be dismissed. Thereafter, the respondents filed civil suit. The Civil suit came to be decreed. The appeal preferred by the present petitioner to District Judge also came to be dismissed on 5.03.2008. It is after this order passed by the District Judge dismissing the appeal against an eviction decree that the present writ petition has been preferred against the order passed by the appellate authority under the C.P. and Berar Rent Control Order. 4. After having heard learned counsel for the parties, it is apparent that the appellant had come to know about the said 3 order passed by the Rent Controller granting permission in the year 2001. He had accordingly preferred an appeal. The appeal came o be dismissed in the year 2003. Right from 2003 till 2009 the appellant did not take any steps to prefer any writ petition against the order of Additional Collector confirming the grant of permission. It appears that the appeal is being preferred only after the decreed of eviction has been confirmed by the District Judge. Accordingly due to delay and laches on the part of the petitioner the writ petition cannot be entertained. It is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE. chute