THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 1597 of 2004 Date: 25.11.2009 Between: R. Brahmaiah and others. ..... Appellants and The District Collector, Warangal and others. .... Respondents THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO :1597 of 2004 ORAL JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) The appellants filed the present writ appeal being aggrieved by the order dated 13.8.2004 of the learned single judge in W.P.M.P. No.18540 of 2003 and W.V.M.P. Nos. 2947 of 2003 & 411 of 2004 in Writ Petition No. 14978 of 2003, whereby and whereunder the learned single Judge, allowed the vacate stay applications filed by the respondents. The appellants herein are the writ petitioners. They filed the aforementioned writ petition before the learned single Judge challenging the communication of the District Collector to the Mandal Revenue Officer, Mahabubabad, Warangal through which the Mandal Revenue Officer was directed to implement the directions of the Court of Subordinate Judge, Mahabubabad in O.S. No. 172 of 1996, dated 3.5.1997. In that writ petition, they filed W.P.M.P. No. 18540 of 2003 seeking a direction to the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the lands admeasuring Acs. 22.00 situated in Survey No. 551/1 of Mahabubabad Town Warangal District. While ordering notice before admission on 24.7.2003, this Court granted interim suspension as prayed for. Subsequently, seeking vacation of the said order, the 4th respondent filed vacate application being, W.V.M.P. No.2947 of 2003 whereas the respondent-authorities filed W.V.M.P. No. 411 of 2004 before the learned single judge. The learned single Judge, through the order impugned in this appeal, while allowing the vacate applications, vacated the interim order earlier granted. Hence, the appellants-writ petitioners filed the present appeal. Admittedly, the impugned order is only an interim order and the writ petition filed by the appellants-petitioners is still pending before the learned single judge. In the circumstances, we are not inclined to entertain the writ appeal. In view of the fact that the writ petition is of the year 2003, we feel it appropriate to dispose of the writ appeal with a direction to the registry to post the main writ petition itself for final hearing before the learned single Judge on 14.12.2009. The writ appeal is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ___________________ T.MEENA KUMARI,J Date: 25th November, 2009 _________________ SANJAY KUMAR,J pnb