IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29599 of 2010 CHHOTU @ CHHOTEY, SON OF MD. KAMRUDDIN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 05.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in Town P.S. case No. 311 of 2009, G.R. No. 2027 of 2009, Trial No. 455 of 2010 instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 19.1.2010 vide Cr. Misc. 45122 of 2009. Since the petitioner was one of the two persons who had fired at the deceased. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail on the ground that two witnesses subsequently implicated the co-accused and exonerated the petitioner who were also examined under Section 164 Cr. P.C. and stated likewise. Considering that the petitioner is named in the First Information Report by the Informant himself who is an eye witness to the occurrence and these two witnesses were examined after about a month and they are not F.I.R. named witnesses, I am not inclined to review the said order. The application is once again rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)