IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.20724 of 2010 Renu Kumari D/O Sri Devendra Prasad Rai , W/O Sri Sunil Kumar Rai R/O Vill. and P.O. Bahadurpur Patori, P.S.- Patori, Distt.- Samastipur----------------------------------------------------------petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department Bihar Vikash Bhawan, Patna 2. The Commissioner cum Secretary, Human Resources Development Department Bihar Vikash Bhawan, Patna 3. The District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Samastipur through its Member 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Samastipur 5. The Block Education Extension Officer, Marwa Block P.S.- Tajpur, Distt.- Samastipur 6. The Mukhiya cum Chairman Panel Preparation Committee Gram Panchayat Raj Morwa South P.S.- Tajpur, Distt.- Samastipur 7. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Morwa South P.S.- Tajpur, Distt.- Samastipur 8. Rita Kumari W/O Sri Ranjit Kumar Rai R/O Vill.- Rajakha Rampur, P.S.- Tajpur, Distt.- Samastipur 9. The Head Master, Rajkiya Primary School, Anandpur P.S.- Tajpur, Distt.- Samastipur--------------------------------------------------respondents ----------- For the petitioner :Mr.Sushil Kumar Jha, Advocate For the State :Mr.S.S.Mishra, AC to AAG 7 ----- 2. 19.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 19.2.2010 passed in Appeal No. 779 of 2009(Pan) by the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Samastipur by which the appeal of the petitioner has been dismissed. The petitioner had filed the said appeal against her termination communicated to her by letter dated 21.5.2009. 2 The petitioner was an applicant for appointment on the post of Panchayat Teacher in the year 2006 along with others in which respondent No.8 Rita Kumari was selected and appointed. However, the appointment of respondent No.8 was cancelled on the ground that she possessed Intermediate qualification in vocational course. In place of the said respondent No.8 the petitioner was appointed. The issue of equivalence of Intermediate qualification in vocational course was considered and decided by this Court in a large number of writ petitions, one of which being C.W.J.C.No.1631 of 2007 was decided on 18.4.2007. Review applications and L.P.As. against the said decision and in other similar matters were also dismissed. Ultimately the State was compelled to reappoint the respondent No.8 after cancelling the appointment of the petitioner. Aggrieved by the same the petitioner approached the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Samastipur which after considering the aforesaid facts has dismissed the appeal of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has sought to raise various issues including stating that the petitioner filed Civil Review No.329 of 2010 against the order dated 3 21.8.2008 passed in C.W.J.C.No.10203 of 2007 and analogous cases which is pending. This Court is of the view that the order of the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority cannot be assailed on any ground. The entire action of the authorities is based upon the decision rendered by this Court which matters have acquired finality. In the said circumstances, there is no occasion to interfere with the order dated 19.2.2010 passed by the Appellate Authority. The writ application is, accordingly, dismissed. (Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.) Spal/