@ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILAspUR CHHATTISGARH $§a§§WMu M.A. N0. ml§2oo£ x MISCELLANEOU§ APPEAL UNDER SECTIONJ173 OF THE MOTOR VEH!CLES ACT, 1988 APPELLANTS 1. Rai Singh Patel, S/o. Shri I§Non-applicants) “Jairam Patel, aged about 36 years, R/o. Village Kusmisarar, Police Station Saraipali, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh Jairam Patel, S/o. Hiraram Patel, R/o. Village Kusmisarar, Police Station Saraipali, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh VERSUS nEsPqNbENTs : ,z‘Mukesh Kumar Sahu, aged (Applicant) about 24 years, S/o. Shri f Ramgopal Sahu, R/o. Elock Colony, Saraipali, Dlsttict Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh EW,W,W W W .................................................‘..... V..ai 200 ?re§en%: Slu‘i Ratnesh Kumar Agatwal, fc 3‘ thé ayp€]1ant$. Nomi for the resp ondmfh \ amt m (W) HIG}! €€2URT OF CEKEZATTIgGARE VAT BIEASPUR M Eh EH) 25 (3F 26%5 QEmi’hk: Mr arugtliaa Ehirandra l¥s§§3h§éa WELL££€T$ 1aRai Singh Pafe}, S! (1. Shn' mongpplicants) Jairam Pam]: aged abcrut 86 yeam, R] a. ViHage Kimmjgamr, PaHce Station. Saraipah' = District Mahagamund: Chhaftisgmh QVJairam Pate], 8330 Hiraram ?af€1, R! a. Vinage . Kum‘nisarar, Pal‘ice Smtkm W Saramali: District " Mahasamund, Chhamsgarh Vs I‘ RESFGFBEET Mukegh Kumar Sahu, aged (gppm:mt} aha‘ut 24- yea‘m, 8ft}, Shri Ramgapal Sahu, Rf a Wonk Calmiy, Saraiyali , Dimricf Mahasamund C1111afh'sgarh Heard 011 admiSSian. This appeal is diaecied Septtamber 2004 paSsed ii]. C}. ladditional Mme}: x‘iXccidt‘nt Clajj a sum 0f RS.25,000;‘— ha$ beea' iiijuriés $11Stained. by him in iuwlvjng tractor N0. MP 23fG~ driven by appellant NQQ. Learned munsel for fl yterugal 0f the statemtent of ; wident that the driver 0f tractc grad rmgligéntly: llawaverl. i116- Eildmg in thta impugnaii award of raah and naggligent drimhg by Tm: tribunal aftar appr recard ha$ 11€gated This argum iiimjng that 110 repmrt was ladg agajlmt the respmldent 1‘11 the 0ifeuc€ und€r Ssctjaus 279‘ agajnsst appdlani No.1 211d on, the learned Magktrata Fmm perussal 9f the Vighwakarma it i3 clam that at that the Tractor in quegticn w: agamgt The award dated 9th {1f aim Caga N0: 23f2003 bv Semnd us Tfibunal, Mahasamund whet (aby awarded ta the respondent far the a motor accident dated 117.2002 2-256 immeti by appellant N0.1 and \e appeBante embraite that fmm. “LEV-2 Deeiaak Wehwakarma it is 1‘ wats net driving the vehicle i‘ashly tribunal has recerded ermnemis that the accident occurred hecausse aypellaut No. 1. miating the exridenee available 0n em: {if the appellant by recerding a ;ed by the appellants in this regard paljce station, 011 the mntrary all 337 ft: 338 crf IPC wee regietered his admissian Tine was imyosed by etatement (if 3%..Ww2 Deepals: the time 6f accident he hae alleged. 1S driven rashly and negligently by XI—xHC—78 3aW, We, W3? W WED—e Mk ..........................l.in 200$ V @ anew nae (W) :mémér ewe ammm meet 311w mweeem a: aimm maeeam ‘ Judge g; Age—73 A WW, m,W $ 3‘ m m v “i m0 W W (WW5 £F§£§E§ i mmm ' 'y Wmgm 1‘63111t 0f Whiéh it {iaghad causing injuries ta '5 ammllmlt Na} aw; a tht’: twpondenh V ~w Tliarefm‘m 3’11 via? 0f t .6 abavs, the 311m (xf Rs.25,000f* W‘ ”i awarda‘i by th€ txibunal t‘ the reS§1(}11.&_$11t for the i11juri€$ 3E1 this V \ l sustamed by him is jugt and graym" Thaw i3 110 substanw appeal, the apyeal i$ Liable tr} be (k‘Smis‘saed' anii it is harsby {Esmiwed at the admissiau st € itS€1i ” sd/- Dhirendra Mishra