1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2045 OF 2005 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL(L)NO.881 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income tax-VI ..Appellant Mumbai V/s. M/s.Electronic Enterprises India Pvt...Respondent Ltd Mumbai Mr.A.D.Kango with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan, Advocate, for Appellant Mr.Atul K. Jasani, Advocate, for Respondent CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & R.S.MOHITE,JJ. DATE : 5TH FEBRUARY, 2008 P.C. . This is a Notice of Motion for condoning a delay of 390 days in filing of the main appeal. On perusal of the affidavit in support we find that the draft of appeal memo was received on or around 16th August,2004 from the Ministry of Law but the appeal was filed on 15th July, 2005. There is no explanation whatsoever given for the delay caused between 16th August, 2004 and 15th July, 2005. In 2 our view, therefore, the cause shown does not amount to sufficient cause and hence, the Notice of Motion stands dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)