@ IN THE HON'BLB HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR ^ W.P. ( c) No. /2011 PETITIONBR o^\o ^' ^" .,,.-.3^ yiGS'-*-^ ......-•••""\ O \ v^..^-r-" ^-^.'""" ....-••* ESPONDENTS: Neelmani W/0 Shri Dolardas Aged about 58 years Occupation Kotwar R/0 Village MandirHasod Tahsil Abhanpur Dist - Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS (1) State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary , Department of Revenue Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur ( C.G.) '<"' (2) Collector, Raipur Dist-Raipur (C.G.) -^e^- (3) Chief Executive Officer New Raipur Development Authority Teli bandha Jedhi Vila Near National Garage Ring Road Raipur Dist Raipur ( C.G.) ^ WRJT PBTJTZbJV UNDERARTICL& ^26/^7 OF THk COJVS^JTUTJOJV 6^ INl^lA "^^S!!,,, "^ •vf '^ '^sfPS^JS^s: 'f1, ••sessywj | ^vy. "^sesse^: HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0.4639 OF 2011 PETITIONER Neelmani RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Atul Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Advocate for the respondent No.3. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 16th day ofAugust, 2011) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for th,e State submits that the representation has been filed by the petitioner before the Collector, Raipur, in the month of July, 2011. The Collector is taking all necessary steps to decide the representation of the petitioner expeditiously, in accordance with the provisions of the orders of the Ideal Rehabilitation Policy of the Chhattisgarh State, 2007. Some reasonable time is required to do the needful and, as such, the petitiori is premature at this stage. 3. Learned State counsel fairly submits that the decision on the representation, as aforestated, shall be taken within a period of three months after affording an opportunity of hearing to the respondent No.3. 4. In view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation. Gowri Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge