IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc.-M No.28798 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision : 27.09.2011 Meenu and others ... Petitioners versus State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Rajesh Malik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. G.S. Chahal, Addl. AG, Haryana. **** Rajesh Bindal, J Prayer in the present petition is for grant of pre arrest bail to the petitioners in FIR No.232 dated 03.09.2011 for the offence under Section 452/323/506/34 IPC registered at P.S. Kanina District Mahendergarh. The allegations in the FIR are that petitioner No.7 had caused injuries to his sister and mother. The complainant is sister of petitioner No.7 and neighbour of petitioner Nos.1 to 4 being all the ladies are living in the neighbourhood, who as per the FIR were standing on the gate of the house of the complainant. The case set up by petitioner No.7 is that the mother of petitioner No.7 was indulging his sister in immoral traffic activities and he used to stop her. He further submitted that the FIR has been registered under Sections 452, 323, 506 & 34 IPC. The injuries allegedly suffered by the complainant were found to be simple. Offence under Section 452 IPC cannot be made out against petitioner No.7 as it is his own house. Petitioners no.1 to 6 were admittedly standing outside the house. Crl. Misc.-M No.28798 of 2011(O&M) -2- Learned counsel for the State submitted that presently even the complainant and her mother are not living in that house. He did not dispute that petitioner No.7 was living in the same house and further that the injuries allegedly suffered by the complainant and her mother were found to be simple. He further submitted that petitioners No.1 to 6 were standing outside the house when the alleged incident took place. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the case file, I am of the opinion that the petitioners deserve concession of pre-arrest bail. Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer on 08.10.2011 at 10.00 A.M. to join investigation and in case of arrest, they shall be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/ Investigating Officer. They shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called upon for further investigation. They shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438(2) Cr.PC. The petition stands disposed of. September 27, 2011 (Rajesh Bindal) sonia Judge