IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION (S) N0. l OQ EOF 2007 PETITIONER /’ Sukdev Ram Verma, S/o Mamram Verma aged about 37 0A (Chhattisgarh) Versus State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Depattment of Cooperative Societies, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur(Chhattisgarh) 2. Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) U) (u. RESPONDENTS Dy. Registrar, Cooperative Societies Rajnandgaon, Distt Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh 4. Branch Manager, Jila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Dongargarh, Distt ‘ Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) Samiti Prabandhak, Seva Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, Mohara, Tahsil Dongargarh, Distt Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) Seva Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, Mohara, Tahsil Dongargarh, Distt Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) Through its Prabandhak I $ XVRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR single Bench: Hon'ble 5hri $a1ish K. Agrnihoh‘i, J. w. P. (5) No. 1043 of 2007 I Pe'ri'fioner Sukdev Ram Verma Versus Responden‘ts 5mm of Chhu'H'isgurh and o'rhers Presen't: Mr. Shoshank Thakur, counsel for 'rhe pe-rifioner. Ms. Suni'ra Jain, Panel Lawyer for fhe Sfa'ré. ORDEk (Passed on *his 23rd Day of February, 2007), 1. Imrned counsel appearing for 'l'he pe‘l'i‘l’ioner wrks permission of fhis Cour‘l fo wifhdraw this pefifion with liberty f0 fake recourse to legal remedies fha'l' may be available under law. I'l’ is ordered accordingly. 2. The wrif pefi'l'ion is accordingly dismissed as wi'fhdrawn \yifh 'l'he above S'l'a'led liber‘i’y. No order as +0 cosl's. Sd/- l l l Satish K.Agnihotri l l Judge y Subhash V