3 ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. No. -L3&-^ /2003 Petitioner /,f espondents ^ ^•''...••f .^'CL y ^y^&-' ^<^^*' ..^^^ ^- .<^w y ^ MITHULAL, Son ofHari Ram Ratre, aged about 45 years, resident of Village Jogesara, Vikas Khand Bilaigarh, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through : The Secretary Panchayat and Samaj Kalyan, Govemment of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Additional Collector, Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3. Prescribed Authority Sub Divisional Officer, Bilaigarh, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 4. Presiding Officer, Additional Tahsildar, Bhatgaon, Bilaigarh, District Raipur (C.G.) 5. Shri Chheduram, Son of Ledwaram Sahu, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Tata, Vikas Khand Bilaigarh, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) -" ^ \ -2- WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227^0F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS ETC. AND/ ^ .^ • . - \ ^^ OR NECESSXR¥DIRECTION/ORDERS. '^^ " ¥^, ^as& HIGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH AT BILASPUR WRjTPETmQNNO,130^QF:2QQ3 ^ Petltloner Versus Respondents Mithulal State of Chhattisgarh & others. WRiTPETiTiON UNDER ARTiCLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF 1NDIA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri U.R.Khosiey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.V.Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDERfORAU (Passed on 28th day of July, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitjoner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition on the ground that the petition has become infructuous. 2. !t is ordered, as prayed for. 3. Accordingiy, the writ petition is dismissed, as having become infructuous. Consequently, M(W)P No.1195/03 is aiso dismissed. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ashok