IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 834 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3926 OF 1994 Shri Pandurang Kashinath Nalawade ..Applicant (Org. Petitioner) Vs. 1. Shri Vishnu Shankar Raut and ors. ..Respondents Ms. Preetam P. Tendulkar for applicant. Ms. Gauri Godse for respondent no.1. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. Date : April 05, 2007. Date : April 05, 2007. Date : April 05, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard Ms. Tendulkar, the learned counsel for the applicant who is petitioner no.2 in Writ Petition No. 3926 of 1994. It is contended by the applicant that the original petitioner no.1 - Rajaram is no more and, therefore, the applicant be allowed to be impleaded as the sold petitioner by deleting the name of Rajaram. There is no dispute that Rajaram has his children and more particularly respondent nos.3 to 4 in the present application and secondly the applicant is already a petitioner. . Hence, this application is misconceived and the same is hereby rejected. The LRs of Rajaram may apply for being brought on record as the petitioner nos.1a to 1c, if so desired. (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.)