IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (PIL) No. 68 of 2009 Alok Sharma ……… Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others .……. Respondents. Mr. Sudhir Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.P. Upadhyaya, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 7. Mr. B.S. Negi, Advocate for respondent No. 8. Mr. S.C. Tyagi, Advocate for respondent Nos. 9 and 10. Date of Judgment: 18.08.2010 JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. BARIN GHOSH, C.J. (ORAL) A public-spirited person Mr. Alok Sharma has in the present writ petition raised many interesting situations prevalent in the educational department of the State. It has roused the concern of the Government, and in particular in its Education Department. From the counter affidavit, it appears that on certain aspects of the matter, steps have been taken and in some aspects of the matter, the steps are being taken. We hope and expect that the matters in respect of which steps have not yet been taken, would be taken soon for the public good and for the good of the State, and with that hope, we conclude the matter. 2. The writ petition stands disposed of. (V.K. Bist, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 18.08.2010 18.08.2010 Amit