pr?-- ^siVQ'LL QCMi^ r/^y-yDZ- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. ^- ^ 120Q^ ETITIONER ^n ^' ^ ,^-€/ .^y 1i'w ^t" .;'v- Prafulla Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Dhani ram Sahu aged about -45 years, Assistant Teacher Govt.Primary School- Kateli, Block Development Office- Saranggarh District- Raigarh (CG) RESPONDENTS 1) ...^0^ ^ /^\^ ^y ^o^' VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, School Education Department Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^ w 2) District Education Officer, District - Raigarh (C.G.) 3) Block Development Office, Saranggarh, District Raigarh, (C.G.) ^- <^- WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/ OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT {S) AND OTHER ORDER (S) OR DIRECTION (Sl ETC. o') HIGH COURT QF CHHATTSSGARH AT B!LASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATiSH K. AGNMOTRLJ. Petjtioner Respondents WRIT PETITJON (S.) N0.4 OF 2007 Hemant Kumar Sharma versus State of Chhattisgarh and others Petitioner Resoondente WRIT PET3TION fS.) N0.5 QF 2007 Smt. Chanda Rani Thakur versus State of Chhattisgarh and others Petitioner WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.7 OF 2007 Magan Lal Yadav yersus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and others WRST PETSTION (S.) N0.8 OF 2007 Petltioner Respondente Versys Chaitram Sidar State of Chhattisgarh and others Petitioner WR!T PETITION (S.) N0.13 OF 2Q07 Ravi Shankar Patel yersus Respondents : State of ChhatSisgarh and others Petitioner Respondents WRIT PETITiON (S.) N0.19 OF_2Q07 Dhanesh Kumar Sharma versys State of Chhattisgarh and others Petitioner WRST PETITJON (S.) N0.26 OF 2007 Prafulia Kumar Sahu yersus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and othsrs Petltioner Resoondents WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.27 OF 2007 Akhiiesh Kumar Shrivastava versus State of Chhattisgarh and others ~5 WRJT PETITJON (S.^ N0.28 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents Versys Natthu Lal Sao State of Chhattisgarh and others Petitioner WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.29 OF 2007 Smt. Abista Kujur versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and others Petitioner WRiT PETITiON (S.) N0.30 OF 2007 Gopal Ram Rawat versus Respondents : State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and others Petitioner WRIT PETITSON (S.) N0.31 OF 2007 Prahlad Kumar Banjare versus Respondents : State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and others Petitioner WR!T PETITiON (S.) N0.32 OF 2007 GopaS Ram Patel versus Respondents : State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and others Petjtioner WRIT PETITSON (S.) N0.33 OF 2007 Lakhan Lal Sarthi versus Respondents : State Govt. of Chhattlsgarh and others WR1T PETITION (S.) SSIO.S1_OF^2007 Petitioner Respondents yeisus Mod. Akhtar The State Government of Chhattisgarh and others Petitioner Respondents WRST PETIT!ON (S.) N0.66 OF2QQJ Smt. Parwati Bai Dhanker versus The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another Petitioner WRIT PETSTION (S.) N0.70 OF 2007 Jagdish Prasad Daharia versus Respondents : State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and another Present : Mr. Rakesh Anthony, Mr. Sanjay Patei and IVIr. Ajay Shrivastava, counsei forthe petitioner(s). Mr. Satish Gupta, Deputy Government Advocate and IVIs. Sunita Jain. Panei Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER =th (Passed on 15"' Day of January, 2007) llNBNr' Learned counsel appearing for the parties jointiy submit that the facts and question of law invoived in the present bateh of writ petitions are squareiy covered by the decision of thls Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj vs. Municipsl Corporation, Durg an<S another1. 2. In subsequent cases. i.e., Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (GopesA Kumar Verms vs. The State Govt. of Chhattlsgarh and anothef) and other connected matters, decided by this Court on 15-12-2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28-1-1895. issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Dipioma in Education Examination. it was ciarified that the nomendature of the Basic Tralning institute. i.e., B.T.!. has been ^5 ) changed and renamed as Dipioma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are aiso covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Verma vs. The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh andanofher) (Supra). 3. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.T.i./D.Ed. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circuiars dated 24-12- 1998 and 1-3-1999 and further whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. 4. A copy of this order be piaced on the record of the connected writ petitions. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge 1 2006 (!1) MPJR-CG 96