1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2110 OF 2003 OF MOTION NO. 2110 OF 2003 OF MOTION NO. 2110 OF 2003 IN IN IN WEALTH WEALTH WEALTH TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 690 OF 2003 TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 690 OF 2003 TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 690 OF 2003 The Commissioner of Wealth Tax .... Appellant Mumbai Vs. M/s Hindalco Inds. Ltd., Worli .... Respondent Mr. A.D. Kango for Appellant. Mr. Pankaj R. Toprani for Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, & : F.I. REBELLO, & : F.I. REBELLO, & J.P. J.P. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DEVADHAR, JJ. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 12TH SEPTEMBER, 2007 : 12TH SEPTEMBER, 2007 : 12TH SEPTEMBER, 2007 P.C. . The delay is less than 200 days. Considering the practical difficulties which the Department was facing including referring the matters to the Law Department, Government of India for drafting the Appeal Memo and considering the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, in our opinion, the cause shown would amount to sufficient cause. Hence, delay condoned. The Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 2. Office to register the Appeal. ( J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. (F.I. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.)