pNN!^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) Contempt Case (C) No. 3^ of 201^ 91n§l©QCHCll APPLICANT Appellant ^'.^ ^^sS^^"""'. p^-— VERSUS ^ Smt. Sulochana Jaiswal, W/o Shri 5.L. Jaiswal, aged about 40 years, Occupation Clinical Biochemistry Technician, Indira ^andhi bistrict Hospital, Korba, District-Korba (C.G.) RESPONbENTS :1. Dr. P.R. Kumbhakar, S/o Shri Sukhiram Kumbhakar, aged about 56 years, Chief Medical & Health Officer, District Hospital Korba (C.O.), R/o Quarter No. F-7, Irrigation Colony, Near Potice Station, Darri, District-Korba (C.G.) Dr. (7.L. Wadhwani, S/o not known to the applicant, Civil Surgeon-Cum- Hospital Superintendent, District Hospital Korba (C.G.) CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER SECTION 12 OF ^ONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT 1971 READ WITH ARTECLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA z. ^u^^-—'— —— \A' an^r'^i f<rli<=h 37l|E^T 5b*ii(^ ^fea ^a? ^ll^lld^ ^nl^^Ko, iGi<ni^ll< WR^T^KT^ an^r ^ra^ ^...G^..::..^6.^1'^^('lw} ^.................................-.^^ •^^T" •^' Deepii 3^T^<H^R'^f5n SB : Hon5bte Sbri Man indra Mohan Bhrivastava. j. 04-02-2011 Shri Bharat Rajput, counsei forth< This petition has been fited all 23/4/10 passed in writ appeai No.97/10 4?herein this Court ordered status quo as on that day with regard to the working of the|petitioner to be maintained. Learned counsel for the petition} 19/3/2010 whereby she was sent bac^ Midwife, a writ petition was preferred) thereafter, a writ appeai was filed whereir] Court. He submits that during the perioc| ieave and finaily she again appeared for The petitioner was transferred vid interim order in favour of the petitioner, j Court on 23/04/2010. Learned counsei f( repiy in writ appeai has been fiied. Thei for this Court to initiate contempt proceed|ngs against the respondents The petitioner wouid be at iiberty the writ appeal by the respondents. With the aforesaid obsen/ations, trje petition is finaiiy disposed ofr. cbNfd^il^ ^HdT'?^^ <Fai^i< iT3rf^P:T3TT^T petitioner. •ging willfut disobedience of order dated T submitted that against the order dated to the origina! post of Auxiliary Nursing which was dj'smissed on 5/4/2010 and the ora7er of status quo was passed by this from 31/3/2010 to 4/4/2010, the petitioner was on ieave and thereafter, she submitted herjoining on 6/4/2010, for extending uty on 29/4/2010. Learned cpunse! for the petitioner submits that thereafter the p^titioner is not being paid her salary. He submits that during the period from 29/'0^/2010 to 13/08/2010, she 'nas also signed the attendance register; order dated 19/03/2010 ana' there was no [untii status quo order was passed by this |r the petitioner couid not point out that any ^fore, at this stage, it wouid not be proper |o revive this petition when repiy is fiied in Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge t^