IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH FEBRUARY 2007 / 25TH MAGHA 1928 WP(C).No. 5062 of 2007(C) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SOORYA VMR REALTORS PVT. LTD., DOOR NO.195, PANJU COMPLEX, N.H.ROAD, COIMBATORE, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, R.NITHIN. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.SURESH KUMAR SMT.PRIYA VIJAYAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALAKKAD. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALAKKAD SOUTH, PALAKKAD. 3. JANAKARAJ, S/O.RAJAGOPALAN, KUNNATHURMEDU, KUNNANUR AMSOM, PALAKKAD. 4. ROOPESH, S/O.RAJAGOPALAN, 16/328, KUNNATHURMEDU, PALAKKAD. R1 AND 2 BY GP SHRI P.A. SALIM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J.B. KOSHY and T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JJ. ---------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 5062 of 2007C ---------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of February, 2007 Judgment Petitioner is a company engaged in the construction of an apartment complex. They purchased the property recently. It is stated that respondents 3 and 4 have filed a suit against the previous owner. That was dismissed for non-prosecution and restoration application is pending. In a petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India, we are not going into the question of title, possession etc. If any of the civil rights of the petitioner is infringed, it is for the petitioner to approach the civil court and get an order of injunction. However, police should see that law and order is maintained and lives of all the parties are not endangered. J.B.KOSHY JUDGE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE vaa W.P.(C).No./2007 2 J.B. KOSHY AND T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JJ. -------------------------- W.P.(C) No.5062/2007 -------------------------- Judgment Dated:14th February, 2007