CRIMINAL REVISION NO.1676 OF 2011 (O&M) :{ 1 }: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISION: NOVEMBER 07, 2011 Swaranjit Kaur .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. Nandan Jindal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Mehardeep Singh, AAG, Punjab, for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. Relies on an order passed in Criminal Revision No.1611 of 2011 (Renu Jain and another Vs. State of Punjab) filed by the co-accused, which has already been disposed of by this Court by reducing the sentence to the period already undergone. The custody certificate is handed over in the Court today, which is taken on record. As per this, the petitioner has now undergone sentence of 1 year 1 month and 11 days as on 3.8.2011. While disposing of Renu Jain's case (supra), the fine was enhanced. The counsel says that the petitioner CRIMINAL REVISION NO.1676 OF 2011 (O&M) :{ 2 }: did not receive any amount and so the case for enhancing the fine in this case is not made out. Since the petitioner has already undergone substantive period of custody, her sentence is reduced to the period already undergone. However, the fine shall stand enhanced to `10,000/-. In case of default in payment of fine, the petitioner shall have to undergo the complete sentence awarded to her. The revision petition is accordingly disposed of. November 07, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE