IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.389 of 2010 1.MUKESH KUMAR @ MUKESH KUMAR SINGH 2.SARBJEET KUMAR 3.RAM PRASAD SINGH 4.RAJU KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR . 3 19.3.2010 KHAN This case has been brought under the heading ‘To Be Mentioned” at the instance of the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in the instant case all the petitioners were granted bail by this court on 8.3.2010 but due to inadvertence the date of the order has been written as 5.3.2010. He further submits that from the computer print out copy of the order it appears that only the name of petitioner no.1 Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar Singh & Ors has figured in the order dated 5.3.2010 (wrongly typed in place of 8.3.2010) and the name of petitioner nos.2 to 4 does not figure in that order, though the bail has been granted to all four petitioners. In the circumstances, let the date of order dated 5.3.2010 passed in this case be read as being passed on 8.3.2010 granting bail to all the four petitioners namely (i) Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar Singh, (ii) Sarbjeet Kumar, (iii) Ram Prasad Singh and (iv) Raju Kumar, in the event of their arrest/surrender within six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in Dehri P.S. Case No.346 of 2009. Let this order be communicated through fax at the cost of the petitioners. (S.P.Singh,J) - 2 -