IN THE $GH COygT QE CHHATTISGARH BTLASPUR wRrr PETITION (a) No. Hag OF 2009 /’1. xshwar Dayan aajwade, 5/0 5hr; Jait Ram Rqjwnde, aged about 38 years, R/O Viilage- Kharwat Post- Chhinddand. District Korea, (6.6.) Mifhilesh Kumar Verma, 5/0 shri Ram 3m? Mahto, aged abouf 43 years, R/O af present PREMABAG, Baikunfhpur, Distric'r— Korea, (C.G.) Krishna Kumar Rcjwade, s/O Shri Shyarn Lal. aged abouf 39 years, -R/O Village- Kharwaf. Pas?— Chhifnddand, District Korea. (C.6.) VER§Q§ gESPONDENTS : an Union cf India, ‘rhrough secretary, Manav $ansadhan Department (Madhyamik Evam Higher 5hik5ha EducaTion), A~28, Kaiiash Colony, New Delhi. 7 A2) Assistam Commissioner, T.R.$. Navodaya Vidyaiay semifi, A-28, Kaialash Cotony, New Delhi. /(3) Assisfan'r Commissioner, Regional Office Navodaya Vidyaiay Samiti, 160, Zane—15nd MP. Nagar, 3hopal, (MR) /(4) Principal, Jawahur Navoday School, Boikunfhpur, Korea, District- Korea, (6.6.) o‘ol / r , Kl ~ i7% £9 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETlTl0N (C) NO. 3749 OF 2009 Petitioners Ishwar Dayal Rajwade & Others Versus Respondents Union of India Others & WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present : - Shri Awadh Tripathi, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Anand Verma, Advocate for the respondent No.1/Union of India. Shri Amiyakant Tiwari, Advocate on behalf‘ of Shri Manish Sharma, Advocate for therespondent No.2 to 4. I ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 23rd day of October, 2010) By this petition, the petitioners seek a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No.4 to admit sons of the petitioners, namely Urgesh Rajwade, Rupesh Verma and Sourabh Kumar Rajwade respectively. The respondent No.4 in its return has stated that so far as son of the petitioner No.1 is concerned, he has been admitted on merit. However, the sons of petitioner No.2 & 3 could not be admitted as they do not fall in the select Iist of Nural Open Merit List prepared for admission. Thus, they are not entitled to be admitted in the course. It is further submitted that each class has the sanctioned trength and no admission beyond the sanctioned strength is possible, having regard to the teachers-students ratio. The contention of the respondent No.5 merits acceptance. Thus, there is no merit in this petition, the petition is accordingly dismissed. No order asto costs. ,s Sci/z _ e- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Asho k s