IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32336 of 2011 Mithlesh Kumar son of Sri Sarjug Mistri Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 30.9.2011 Supplementary affidavit filed today on behalf of the petitioner be kept on the record. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 498A and 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that even though initially the case u/s.304B I.P.C. has been instituted against the in-laws of the deceased, charge sheet was submitted u/s.306/34 I.P.C. Considering the same, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Masaurhi in connection with Masaurhi P.S. Case No.115 of 2010, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner, (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the - 2 - police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )