MC 2338/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE C.R. SARMA Heard Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel, appearing for the applicant-appellant. Perused the Office note, dated 06.12.2010 and the copy of the Newspaper, namely, ’The Assam Tribune’ dated 25.11.2010. From the said paper publication, it appea rs that notice in respect of respondent No.4 was published in the said newspaper requiring the respondent aforesaid to appear on 01.12.2010. None has appeared o n behalf of respondent No.4. Hence, in view of the said paper publication, the s ervice of notice in respect of respondent No.4 is deemed to be completed. None appears for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in spite of service of notice. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act,,1963 for condoning the delay of 91 days in filing the connected appeal against the judgment and aw ard, dated 17.03.2009, passed by the learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribu nal, Kamrup, in MAC Case No.3135 of 2006. Having heard the learned counsel, appearing for the appellant-applicant, the gro unds cited in the petition are found to be acceptable. Accordingly, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The Misc. case is disposed of.