W.P. No.20757/2011 (S) Shambhu Khare vs. State of M.P. & Ors. 15.12.2011 Heard Shri Vinod Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for a direction to the respondent authorities to consider and decide the representation claiming reinstatement in service on account of the fact that the order convicting him by the trial court has been modified by the appellate Court. Previously, the petitioner had filed W.P No.15538/2011 (S) which was dismissed by order dated 14.9.2011 with observations to the effect that the petitioner had rushed to the Court immediately after filing the representation without giving any time to the authority concerned to decide the same. However, while doing so this Court had no doubt that the authority shall consider and decide the representation filed by the petitioner expeditiously in accordance with law. 1 W.P. No.20757/2011 (S) Shambhu Khare vs. State of M.P. & Ors. As this Court had already observed that the authority shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner expeditiously in accordance with law in the previous petition, filed by the petitioner, the filing of the second petition by the petitioner seeking the same relief amounts to abuse and misuse of the process of the Court. The petition, filed by the petitioner, is accordingly dismissed by reiterating the previous observations issued by this Court, as no further observations are necessary in the present petition. To enable the authority to decide the representation of the petitioner expeditiously, a copy of the order passed today alongwith a copy of the petition be served on the authority. With the aforesaid observation, the petition filed by the petitioner stands dismissed. C.C as per rules. ( R. S. JHA ) J U D G E mms/- 2