MAC.APP.No.725/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP.No.725/2007 Date of Decision: 9th March, 2010 % RAM MOHAN UPADHYAY ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Nilkanth Kumar, Adv. versus KALA DEVI @ KAMLA DEVI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Nirmal Singh, Adv. Mr. Jeet Pathak, Adv. for Ms. Rajdipa Behura, amicus curiae. CORAM :- THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may NO be allowed to see the Judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? NO 3. Whether the judgment should be NO reported in the Digest? JUDGMENT (Oral) 1. Respondent No.1 is present in the Court along with her brother, Amar Singh and counsel. Respondent No.1 has received a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- in cash today from the appellant’s brother in full and final settlement of all her claims against the appellant. Respondent No.1 has signed the receipt of full and final settlement. The original has been shown to the Court and the photocopy of the same is taken on record. MAC.APP.No.725/2007 Page 2 of 2 2. The full and final settlement between the appellant and claimants/respondents No.1 to 3 is taken on record. The appeal is disposed of as settled. 3. All pending CMs stand disposed of. 4. Claimants/respondents No.1 to 3 against the appellant stands satisfied in terms of this settlement. However, claimants/respondents No.1 to 3 shall be at liberty to execute the award against respondent No.4. 5. Copy of this order be given ‘Dasti’ to learned counsel for the parties under the signature of Court Master. J.R. MIDHA, J MARCH 09, 2010 aj