IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.26825 of 2011 1. Milan Sah @ Milan Kumar Sah, son of Late Amiri Sah 2. Laxman Sah @ Laxman Kumar, son of Late Amiri Sah Both are resident of village – Bara Jairam, P.S. – Chiraiya, District – East Champaran. 3. Suresh Sah, son of late Sheela Sah 4. Mahohar Sah @ Manohar Kumar, son of Suresh Kumar All are resident of village – Nirpur, P.S. – Chiraiya, District – East Champaran. 5. Pardesh Sah @ Pardeshi Sah, son of late Munilal Sah, resident of village – Ghorasahan, P.S. – Ghorasahan, District – East Champaran. -------- Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Meena Devi, wife of Milan Sah, daughter of Late Krit Sah, resident of village – Sishani, P.S. – Pakridayal, District – East Champaran. ------Opposite Party ********** With Criminal Miscellaneous No.19806 of 2011 Milan Sah @ Milan Kumar Sah, son of Amiri Sah, resident of village – Bara Jairam, P.S. – Chairaiya, District – East Champaran. -------- Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Meena Devi, wife of Milan Sah, daughter of Late Krit Sah, resident of village – Sishani, P.S. – Pakridayal, District – East Champaran. ---------Opposite Parties. ********** (in Cr. Misc. No. 26825/2011) For the petitioners : Mr. Ansul, Adv. For the State : Mr. Parmanand Prasad, APP (In Cr. Misc. No. 19806/2011) For the petitioner : Mr. Ansul, Adv. For the State : Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP ******* 05. 30.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners in Cr. Misc. No. 26825/2011, apprehending their arrest in connection with Pakridayal P.S. Case No. 60/2010 arising out of Complaint Case No. 563/2010 for the offences under Sections 363/364/369 of the Indian Penal Code pending before Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari, and petitioner in another Cr. Misc. No. 19806/2011, apprehends his arrest in connection with Tr. No. 1596/2010 arising out of C- 244/2010 for offences under Sections 498(A)/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending before Sri A.K. Mall, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Sikrahana at Motihari. The petitioners are named accused in these connected cases and in view of settlement between the parties being disposed of by this composite order. Sole petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 19806/2011 who is petitioner no. 1 in another application his husband of the complainant informant and rest petitioners are in-laws with allegations of demand of dowry, torture etc. and subsequently kidnapping of son of the couple. Submission of the Bar is that all the disputes between the parties are resolved and they intend to resume conjugal and family life giving due respect to each other and their respective families. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of filing joint petition of compromise/individual application on behalf of petitioner/petitioners in respective cases, and in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari, in connection with Pakridayal P.S. Case No. 60/2010 arising out of Complaint Case No. 563/2010, and another satisfaction of Sri A.K. Mall, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Sikrahana at Motihari, in connection with Tr. No. 1596/2010 arising out of C- 244/2010, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly till disposal of the case, in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Further additional condition is in the event of filing joint petition of compromise or individual petition only on getting positive response the couple will be permitted to reside with each other at their place of choice and also to report personally on the dates fixed to the court and on being satisfied of their conduct due orders in accordance with law shall be passed. Rajeev/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)