IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19823 of 2008 PINTU KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 07.7.2008. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Baniapur P.S.Case No.95 of 2007 registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code and prays for grant of anticipatory bail. Mr.Prabhat Ranjan, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, contends that the petitioner has not been named in the first information report and as such, he deserves to be granted anticipatory bail. Mr.Gopesh Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor, appears for the State. True it is that the petitioner has not been named in the first information report but his complicity in the crime has surfaced during the course of investigation. Having heard counsel for the party and taking into consideration the nature of allegation and material available, I am not inclined to accede to the prayer of the petitioner. Application stands dismissed. (C.K.Prasad) ahk