IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3900 of 2010 SATYENDRA RAVIDAS @ SATENDRA RABIDAS,son of Lakhichand Ravidas,resident of village-Rasuli Bigha,P.S.-Khudaganj,District-Nalanda. .. .. .. Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Kiran Devi,w/o Satyendra Ravidas @ Satendra Rabidas,d/o Chulhu Ravidas, resident of village-Chamhera Rasalpur, P.S.-Ekangarsarai, District-Nalanda. .. .. .. Opp.Parties ----------- 04/ 26-04-2010 Heard the parties. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.283 © of 2009, in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 323/498A of the Indian Penal Code as also under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. In compliance of order dated 08-04-2010, petitioner and opposite party no.2 are physically present in Court and have been duly identified by their respective lawyers. In compliance of the aforesaid order a joint compromise petition has also been filed duly sworn by the petitioner as also opposite party no.2. Let it be kept on record. The aforesaid compromise petition shall form part of this order. As per terms of the compromise, the petitioner has undertaken to keep his wife (opposite party no.2) as his legally wedded wife with all dignity, comfort and honour in his house and it has further been undertaken that there shall be no further demand of dowry or torture upon opposite party no.2 by the petitioner. Opposite party no.2 (wife) has also undertaken to co- 2 operate with her husband (petitioner) for having cordial matrimonial relationship between the two. It has also been agreed that petitioner and opposite party no.2 shall go together from this Court. In view of the aforesaid compromise, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from today in the above noted case, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa (Nalanda), subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. However, it is made clear that if good relationship continues between the petitioner and opposite party no.2 for some reasonable period, then they shall be at liberty to file an appropriate petition in the court below for disposal of the criminal case in accordance with law. It goes without saying that if the petitioner violates the terms and conditions of the compromise, then it will be open for opposite party no.2 to file a petition in the court below for cancellation of bail. AH/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)