IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 8TH MAY 2009 / 18TH VAISAKHA 1931 WP(C).No. 13361 of 2009(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. SINI JOHN, AGED 24 YEARS, D/O.ALEYKUTTY JOHN, MUTHUMARATHIL HOUSE, EDAYIRICKAPUZHA P.O., KANGAZHA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. RIYASALI KUNNIYULLATHIL, S/O.KUTTIYALI, AGED 24 YEARS, RESIDING AT THAYYULLATHIL HOUSE, KALLACHI.P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.MADHU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN - SC FOR UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).13361/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 8th day of May, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioners were the students of Govt. Engineering College, Palakkad, for B.Tech Degree Course, 2003-07. Apparently, dissatisfied with the marks obtained by the first petitioner in one paper in the 4th Semester Examination conducted during the month of June 2008, and by the second petitioner in one paper in the 6th semester Examination conducted in December, 2007, they had applied for revaluation, as per Exts.P1 and P2. They are aggrieved that the result of the revaluation has not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of the B.Tech supplementary Examination. The applications for revaluation are pending before the respondents. W.P.(C).13361/2009 2 3. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to publish the results of the revaluation sought for by the petitioners as evidenced by Exts.P1 and P2, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment provided the applications for revaluation are in order and otherwise correct. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs