^ \/v^- BKNV IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P.S.No. ^-y^, /10 PETITIONER Uttam Das Mahant,S/o Late Hirmaman Das, aged about 38 years, Lab Attendant, Gramya BharitiVidyapith, Hardi Bazar, Korba (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department ofHigher Education, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) ^' 2. Director, Higher Education, Directorate Raipur (C.G.) 3. Shashta-i Shikshan Samiti, Through its Secrefary,Gramya Bharti Vidyapith (Mahavidyalaya) Hardi Bss.ar, Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF ESTDIA mGHCOURT OF CHHAtTISCrARH AT StL&SPVR SB : HOB'BLBSHRI JUSTICE PRITIKKBR DIWAKBR W.PJS!LW0^579022010 Uttain Das MahaDt Versus State ofC.G, & Others WRIT PBTITION CKDER ARTICLB 226 OF THB CONSTITUTION Shri Neeraj Choubey, counsel for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S.Moorthy, Dy. A.G. for the State/resps. 1 & 2. ORDER (07.10.2010} Grievaace of the petitioner in fbe present petition is that he is the einployee of Govemiaent Aided private educational iastitution aad fhough he is entitled for the benefit of 6th Pay Coinmission as recoimiiended by the Govenunent for the SovemiueDt eniployees but fhe sanie has not been given to hnn. According to the petitioner earMer also when fhe benefit of 5& Pay Coinrttission was refused to petitioner and similarly placed persons, writ petitions were filed before this Court aad ultunatety after passing of oider by tfais Court the benefit of 5th Pay Coiiunission was graated to theia. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits tliat ends of justice would be served if at this stage the petitioner is pennitted to withdraw this petition aad direction be issued to the respondent N0.1 for deciding the pending representation of fhe petitioner (Annexure P/5) dated 11.6.2010. 3. Counsel appearing for the State submits that the representation has been made by fhe petitioaer directly to the Chief Mioister whereas he is reqiured to make siiitable representation to respondent N0.1. He submits tfaat the case of the petitioner and smiilarly placed persons for graat of 6*h Pay Cominission is already under consideration and let the petitioncr make a fi-esh representation and the same would be decided in accordance with law. 4. Accordingly, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition wifh the aforesaid Hberty. In tbe eventuality of filing a fresh representation by the petitioner before fhe respondent N0.1 withiii a period of one monfh Irom fhe date of receipt of copy of this order, it is expected firoin the said authorities to pass appropriate order as expeditiously as possible preferably wifhin a period offour nionfhs froin the date ofits receipt. 5. It is niade clear that this Court has not expressed aay opiaion on inerits of the case and the aufhority concei-aed would be at Uberty to decide ttie saine strictly in accordance withlaw. Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge