W^ cav^^cwcaawTT'WQ&KHvmu^wvR. (a?.C6at.N0.3/a004 PEnTIONER Additional Chief ^ Judicial M^istrate, Dui^ ; < VBRSUS RESPOMDBNT Shekhar Prakash Sluivastava aad anofher ? Present: . : • ; ' • ,' ' ^ : , • . ! ;.' ' : i' • - Shri D.K. Gwalre, Govenunent Advocate for fhc State/ petitloner. v Shri Pradeep Saxcna, CQunsel for thc Conteiunots. ii;ii;ii;j:^i&ii; ^: Dlvteioa Bench:- H<»n'hleSluiT.P.Sl»altina& Hoa'bleSliiriItL.JlianwarrfJJ ^ ORALORDBR (22.03.2011) PCT T.P^Sliarma, J. These cpntenipt prbceiedings Uavc been initiated at tlie instaiice of the Additioiial ChiefJudiciat Magtetrate, Dui^ agauist the present Conitemiipi-s on fh.e ground of complaiat inade by fhe Coatemnors to Hou'ble tlie .Chief Justice agauist fhe A.C.J.M. Dm^. !, . ' .., :; : ; ,, . - Learaed counsel for fhe Contemnors subinits fhat tlie atteged Goiaplaiut has been xnade by respondcnt No. 1, who was a studexit of Law aad lie has tendered zmconditional a(»lo@r1a para^ 2 of Ilis affidavit. Consadexing tais ftiture career, fhe coatiea^? proceeduigs slKiuld lie dlopped a^iast tfae contemnor. The uiiconditional apblogy prayed for by fhe Gon.teniaors fhrQughaSBdayitperused. ; '; u' ^ si-. ,,^^i' .'N .£ "^ On due consideiation, •we'are ofthe view thatonfhe giound ofapology tendered bythe Contemaois, fhe Contemptproccedings should be dropped. Colisequent^', fhe coatempt proceeduigs arc hereby dropped uader Section 12 (1) ofthe Contempt ofCourts Act, 1971. Sd/- •l;l^j. TP. Shanna Judge Sd/- R.L.Jhanwar Judge ;.:Lu^-uii— .:jl