IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33673 of 2010 SHYAMDEO CHAMAR . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 3/ 27/10/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The earlier application of bail was remanded in absence of adequate discussion in the impugned order rejecting bail. The fresh order refusing bail by the Additional District & Sessions Judge is presently assailed. The allegations are under Section-302 of I.P.C. Learned counsel submits from paragraphs-42, 43, 44 and 46 of te case diary that independent witnesses have stated that both the petitioner and the deceased were in an intoxicated condition supporting and jostling each other in walking. The defence is that the deceased slipped into the water after he fell down being in intoxicated condition. Learned counsel for the State is not able to controvert the aforesaid submissions from the case diary from any other material to deny bail. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of - 2 - Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Danapur, Patna in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No.86/08. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)