IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND NINE ONLY WRIT PETITION No.17 of 2006 Between: Kolagani Atmaram. … Petitioner And The District Collector, Karimnagar District, Karimnagar and three others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri P.Vijaya Sarathy for Sri C.Sreenivas. Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Home for R.2 & R.3. Sri T.Mahender Rao for R.4. This Court made the following: ORDER:- At the interlocutory stage, this Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue an order, direction or writ, one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the inaction of respondent Nos.1 to 3 in not providing security to the petitioner from the 4th respondent because I filed writ petitions and because the 4th respondent is a constable working in the department and in not taking any action against the 4th respondent as arbitrary, unconstitutional being violative of articles 14 and 21 of the constitution of India and direct the respondents No.1 to 3 to provide security to petitioner’s life”. At the hearing, Sri P.Vijaya Sarathy, learned counsel representing Sri C.Sreenivas, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the dispute between the petitioner and respondent No.4 was settled out of Court; and that, therefore, the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the case. In view of this submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. ------------------------------------ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:03-6-2009 MNR