-1- Regular Second Appeal No. 2392 of 2010 (O&M). IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Date of Decision: January 06, 2011. Regular Second Appeal No. 2392 of 2010 (O&M). Bhushan Kumar ... Appellant VERSUS Tara Chand ... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHINDER PAL. 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr.P.S. Jammu, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. R.K. Singla, Advocate, for the respondent. -.- MOHINDER PAL, J. Suit filed by plaintiff-respondent Tara Chand against appellant-defendant Bhushan Kumar for possession of the shop in dispute was decreed by the trial Court. The appeal preferred by the appellant against the judgment and decree passed by the -2- Regular Second Appeal No. 2392 of 2010 (O&M). trial Court was dismissed by the Fist Appellate Court. The appellant-defendant is now in second appeal aggrieved against the judgments and decrees passed by the Courts below. The parties have now compromised the matter. The plaintiff-respondent has placed on record his affidavit as well as of the appellant-defendant along with Civil Miscellaneous Application No.162-C of 2011 incorporating therein the terms and conditions of the compromise. This application is allowed and the affidavits of the parties are ordered to be taken on record. As per the compromise, the appellant-defendant has handed over the possession of the shop in dispute to the plaintiff- defendant, who, in turn, has relinquished his arrears of mesne profits occurred during the pendency of the appeal before the lower appellate Court and before this Court and has also waived off the minimum charges of the electric meter. This appeal is disposed of in view of the above- mentioned compromise between the parties. ( MOHINDER PAL ) January 06, 2011. JUDGE ak