IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12132 of 2009 1. SUNITA DEVI, w/o Dayashankar Sah 2. Shakuntala Devi @ Shankutla Devi,w/o Jagdish Sah, Both residents of village- Bhaluwhiya,P.S.-Shikarganj,Dist.-East Champaran. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 22-04-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that petitioner no.1 is the sister of the deceased and petitioner no.2 is her mother-in-law. Both the sisters, petitioner no.1 and the deceased were married with Dayashankar Sah and it was the deceased who took initiative for marrying petitioner no.1 with her husband. According to the learned counsel, deceased was suffering from Diarrhea. She was being taken to hospital but in way she died. Several days after the death uncle of petitioner no.1 has filed this case only to debar her from succeeding the ancestral property. In the discussed suggested facts and circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In case of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Chiraiya(Sikarganj)P.S.Case No.106/2008, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Sikarahana at Motihari, subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )