!i; . ~>^. RR.N,........^^^.^ Presented by Shri..^A^Afe%/t.^%<7 dated ...........^33..//..^?.y...^.^- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION N0.^3 ^f^ /2006. ~c~^ PETITIONER: '' Tuka Ram Verma, S/o Balaram Verma, aged about 57 years, Field Assistant, Irrigation Department, Ranitarai, Tahsil and District Durg, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS Respondents: v^f. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Water Resource Department, Raipur, Office situated at Secretariat Raipur, Chhattisgarh. •'2. Chief Engineer, Mahanadi Project Raipur, OfBce situated at Raipur. ,3. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Water Resource Department, Tandula Division No.l, Admabad, Balod, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. XI-HC-78 HWCtl ShlTch SST •^l'yict'il, ®Tl1ti'i<»,Rioiuy ^^.^..X3..^3^200^ 3ii^i wva ('iyiyf'aff) sn^r^Tf^-iN; tlwap^Tstiiiti SRIRKHfeTSn^T tii'ifyn-i HiitiT^'te^t<Ri<^i< ^>3lf^IT3TI^T 18.8.2006:. Shri N.S. Dhurandhar, counl Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. f\ advance copy. i-1eard both the counsel. By this writ petition, the peti] dated 7-7-2006 whereby he ha] Dantewada. The main grievance of the showing that the transfer h.as such request was made by the petitioner is that he is a Class-4 been transferred from Tandula whereas, the petitioner is on the In the circumstances, petitioner may be aiiowed to and he be directed to decide the has no objection. Having heard iearned facts and circumstances of the on the merit of the case, the pe] representation aiong with a copy respondent No.2 within a period| respondent No.2 shall decide th^ days from the date of receipt of the points raised by the petitioner, | sel for the petitioner. Idvocate for the State/respondents, on iioner has chalienged his transfer order 5 been transferred from Tandula to maMe pjetitioner is that he has been transferred effected at his request whereas, no ffetitioner. The other grievance of the i, iow paid employee and he has Dantewada at such a far off place of retirement. il for the petitioner submitted that the a representation to respondent No.2 >, to which counsel for respondents bedn en|iployee, td) v^rge counte sBme, coun^el ca$e df for the parties, having regard fo the l, and without expressing any opinion titioner is allowed to make a detaiied this writ petition and its annexures to of 10 days from today and in turn, representation within a period of 30 representation, after considering all h accordance with law. P.T.O. the wr / ^1- 1 XI-HC-78 3^'^TTqicPT, e'Tflw'16, fs|<rtltiy *<IHPn Sfi*llch ^ 200 31T^?Tira^ ((^g^ST) an^Tgiri^iR; traT3SA?Tsb*fi°h Barve r (to^ y ?T(TTW;Hf?(T3I1^T ^' In the meantime, the effect ^i respect of the petitioner shall rema| petitioner is decided. With the direction aforesaid, Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.^ Parties are entitted for certifi4d »bi<if<-i'!fl-fvwsf ft' te^ il»regt ^sri^Tsn^r nd operation of the impugned order in in stayed, tilt the representation of the :he petition stands disposed of. i374/2006 also stands disposed of. copy of this order. Sd/- L.C-Bhadoo Judge P.T.O.