Court No.2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Delay Condonation Application No3229 of 2008 Review Petition No.588 of 2008 On Behalf of Akalanand Bhatt …… Applicant/ Review Petitioner IN Writ Petition (S/B) No. 900 of 2002 Akalanand Bhatt ……… Petitioner Versus Joint Director of Education, Garhwal Region, Pauri and another. ……. Respondents …………………….. Sri Manoj Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner. Sri H.M.Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Date: July 24, 2008 Hon’ble P.C.Verma,J. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the affidavit filed in support of delay condonation application. Delay has satisfactorily been explained. The application is allowed. Delay in filing the review petition is condoned. The learned counsel for the review petitioner submitted that the petitioner was reverted on the ground that his promotion was not approved by the Joint Director of Education. With the review petition the petitioner has filed Annexure –I, which shows that the petitioner’s promotion was duly approved. Therefore, the review petition is allowed. Judgment and order dated 2 04.04.2008 passed in the writ petition is recalled. The order dated 04.07.2002 passed by respondent No.2 is quashed. The petitioner shall be allowed to continue to work on the post of junior clerk. He shall be paid salary regularly. (P.C.Verma,J.) 24.07.2008 P.Singh