IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 6494 of 1998 Between: 1.. J.Nageswara Rao, S/o Damayya, R/o Near Benz Circle, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2.. M.Nageswara Rao, S/o A.Amrutham, R/o Benz Circle, Vijayawada, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Superintending Engineer, R&B, National Highways, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2 The Executive Engineer, R&B, National Highways, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Vijayawada Urban, Vijayawada, Krishna District. (R3 Dismissed for default vide Court Order dt. 8-9-2001) .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order, direction preferably a writ in the Nature of Mandamus declaring action of the respondents in trying to evict the petitioner from their business premises situated at Benz Circle, near Lorry Owners hall, Vijayawada by demolishing the structures as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and violative of Art.14, 21.300 A of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to desist them from evicting of demolishing the structures of the petitioners and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.R.K.AMERANDRA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR ROADS & BUILDINGS The Court made the following : ORDER: The present writ petition is filed seeking a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in trying to evict the petitioners from their business premises situated at Benz Circle, Vijayawada and consequently direct the respondents to desist from evicting or demolishing the structures of the petitioners. This Court while admitting the writ petition granted interim stay of demolition by order dated 11-3-1998. None appeared for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Roads and Buildings, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become in-fructuous. In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed as in-fructuous. No costs. ____________ N.V.RAMANA,J 24-2-2005 TVK ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Superintending Engineer, R&B, National Highways, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2 The Executive Engineer, R&B, National Highways, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Vijayawada Urban, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 4) 2 copies to Government Pleader for Roads and Buildings, High Court of A.P.Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 5).. 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KRD}