IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 2ND SEPTEMBER 2011 / 11TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 23934 of 2011(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. ARATI RAJ, D/O.P.R.RAJAN, AGED 22 YEARS, PERUMANATH HOUSE, NETTISSERY P.O., NETTISSERY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. ANJO LOUIS ANTONY, S/O.M.L.ANTONY, AGED 21 YEARS, MANIPARAMBIL HOUSE, BENNET ROAD, KALATHODE KURA, P.O.OLLUKKARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.MADHU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673 635. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673 635. SC SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 23934 of 2011 APPENDIX EXHIBITS EXT.P1- A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 27.8.11 EXT.P2- A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 27.8.11 EXT.P3- A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 29.8.11 ISSUED BY M/S HCL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, CHENNAI TO THE 1ST PETITIONER (True copy) P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).23934/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 2nd day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners applied for revaluation of 8th semester B.Tech Electrical and Electronics Engineering Examination vide Exts.P1 and P2 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within ten weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4.Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs