1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 22 OF 2010 (Taslimbaig Sabjubaig Mirza .v. State of Maharashtra and another) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri F.T. Mirza, Advocate for the applicant. Shri D.M. Kale, APP for the respondent No.1/State. Shri V.M. Deshpande, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. 09TH FEBRUARY, 2011. Heard. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties submit that in the earlier round of litigation, this Court, by order dated 24th July, 2009 in Criminal Revision Application No. 28 of 2008, directed the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Yavatmal to assign the Criminal Revision No. 90/2006 to some other Additional Sessions Judge to hear application (Exh.11) after giving hearing to all the sides and decide the said application on merit. Both the learned Counsel further submit that the application (Exh.11) is decided; whereas Criminal Revision No. 90/2006 is yet pending for decision. They further make a joint request that without going into the merits of the matter, if the directions are issued to learned Additional Sessions Judge to decide Criminal Revision No. 90/2006 within stipulated time frame keeping the issues raised in application (Exh.11) by the applicant herein open, the purpose would be served. On joint request made by the learned Counsel, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, before whom Criminal Revision No. 90/2006 is pending, to decide the same as early as possible and preferably within a period of six months from today. No further directions are necessary excepting the directions mentioned above. 2 Criminal Revision Application stands disposed of as such. JUDGE *rrg.