-1- IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT CONTEMPT CONTEMPT PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.2 OF 2004 NO.2 OF 2004 NO.2 OF 2004 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.1946 OF 1999 NO.1946 OF 1999 NO.1946 OF 1999 Smt Susheela B. Somaiya ...Petitioner v/s Shri P.M. Kavadia and ors. ...Respondents Mr Mihir Desai for Petitioner. Mr D.H. Mehta with Mr A.R. Joshi for Respondent Nos.4 and 5. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH J. DATE : 24TH APRIL 2007. -2- P.C. :- 1. It is clear from the affidavit filed by the Corporation as also the affidavit filed by the petitioner that the order passed in the writ petition by the Division Bench has in any event been substantially complied with by the Corporation. It appears that there is a difference of opinion in the matter of calculation of the exact amount to which the petitioner is entitled. This cannot be said to be wilful disobedience of the order passed by the Court. Contempt petition cannot be entertained, it is disposed off. It is needless to say that the petitioner would be entitled to adopt any remedy that may be available to the petitioner, either for executing the order or for recovery of the amount. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary as true copy. . Certified copy expedited. ---------------