:1: bgp bgp bgp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1786 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.1786 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.1786 OF 2007 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL (L) NO.438 OF 2007 (L) NO.438 OF 2007 (L) NO.438 OF 2007 IN IN IN ARBITRATION ARBITRATION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.341 OF 2006 PETITION NO.341 OF 2006 PETITION NO.341 OF 2006 Union of India ..Appellant Vs. M/s.Thakkar & Asso. ..Respondent Mr.Zaiwala with Rutuja Ambekar for the Appellant. Mr.Ajay Patil i/b.Sachin U.Dhakephalkar for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 31ST JANUARY,2008 : 31ST JANUARY,2008 : 31ST JANUARY,2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 96 days delay in filing the above Appeal. Perused the Notice of Motion and Affidavit-in-support thereof. For the reasons stated therein sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)