1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO:5163/2008 (Sankalp Vardhini Gramin Yuwa Sanstha vs. State of Maharashtra and another ) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram Court's or Judges Order appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. ................................................................................................................................... CORAM: D.D.SINHA & A. P. BHANGALE , JJ. DATED: 23rd January, 2009. *** 1. Heard Mr Anand Parchure, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr S J Jichkar, learned Asst. Govt. Pleader for Respondent No.1; Mr B G Kulkarni, for Respondent No.2; s/Shri P B Agrawal for R-3; B D Chute for R-5; M L Bhure for R-34; V A Brahme for R-13; N S Adbe for R-37; V M Deshpande for R-22; N B Kalwaghe for R-27 Adv. Madhav Lakhey for R-11,21,,40 and Adv. Anil Madiwale for R-13. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the petitioner-Sanstha has made an application to the University for permission to open an Arts & Science College at Gulabtola Tah.Tiroda Dist. Gondia, from the academic sessions 2008-09. It is further contended that the application of the petitioner was recommended by the University to the State Government for necessary orders under the provisions of the University Act, 1994. However, till this date, the 2 petitioner did not receive any communication from the State Government accepting or rejecting the application. 3. Mr S J Jichkar, learned AGP has submitted that the proposal of the petitioner is already rejected and the order shall be communicated to the petitioner. 4 In the backdrop of the above-referred facts, we dispose of the petition and direct the State Government to communicate the order of rejection of proposal along with reasons, to the petitioner- Sanstha within a period of 15 days form the date of communication of this order. It will be open for the petitioner to challenge the validity thereof, if it so desires. 5. Writ Petition is disposed of. All issues raised in the petition are kept open. JUDGE JUDGE sahare