.^\..^^wl" ^-•"j'.-O.?-;"! ...-• }ff--" ,SA«*"'' ^,.l--' r^ '^••"" IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WMT PETITION (s) N0. S 1 '4 O /2010 B.K. Verma, S/o- Late Shri Fulgo Prasad Verma, Aged about 53 years, Presently working as Project OfBcer- Zila Paachayat- Durg, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh. 1. 3. PETITIONER VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh, Through- Secretary/Under Secretary, Deptt. ofPaachayat aad Rural Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhatdsgarh. Collector, Durg, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh. ChiefExecutive Officer, Zila PaUchayat- Durg, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh. RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA FOR ISSUANCEOF APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORAFtLETC, li:':E,! it' II ! ^v lE'ili ^ 3/ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.5140 OE2010 PETITIONER B.K. Verma RESPONDENTS Versus State ofChhattisgarh & Others Gowri (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyerforthe State. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 17th day ofAugust, 2011) 1. 2. Heard learned counsel forthe parties. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the State submits that there seems to be some discrepancy in the impugned order dated 15-7-2010. Learned counsel further submits that the State may be granted liberty to pass fresh order in administrative exigency and in the public interest. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not been relieved and he is continuing on the post of Project Officer, Zila Panchayat, Durg, till date, therefore, his placementshould not disturbed till a fresh order is passed by the respondent authorities. No objection from other side. In view of the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge