IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 20TH OCTOBER 2008 / 28TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 27809 of 2008(I) PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ 1. MOHANAN ALIAS M.T.MOHAN DAS, NADUVIL HOUSE, SINGUKANDOM, CHINNAKANAL VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK. 2. MANOHARAN, S/O.THAJASING, NADUVIL HOUSE, SINGUKANDOM, CHINNAKANAL VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK. 3. RAJENDRA KUMARI, D/O.THAJASING, NADUVIL HOUSE, SINGUKANDOM, CHINNAKANAL VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK. 4. RAMESH KUMAR, S/O.GURUDAS SING, NADUVIL HOUSE, SINGUKANDOM, CHINNAKANAL VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK. 5. SREEKUMAR N.M., S/O.MOHANAN, NADUVIL HOUSE, SINGUKANDOM, CHINNAKANAL VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK. WP(C).No. 27809 of 2008 :: 2 :: 6. ANILKUMAR N.M., S/O.MOHANAN, NADUVIL HOUSE, SINGUKANDOM, CHINNAKANAL VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.T.I.ABDUL SALAM RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI. 2. SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA), NEDUMKANDOM. 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF SURVEY AND LAND RECORDSL.A), RAJAKKAD. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI,J. ---------------------------------------- W.P ( C) No.27809 of 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th October, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioners claim to be in possession of different extents of land in the Chinnakanal Village and claim assignment of the same under the provisions of the Land Assignment Act. They had approached this court earlier in W.P.(C) No.31903/03, which was disposed of under Ext.P6 judgment. The same is to the following effect. “The only prayer is for a direction to the District Collector to consider and pass orders on the application filed by the petitioners for assignment of land vide Ext.P5. The W.P. is disposed of directing the District Collector to look into the representation, conduct enquiry and consider the same based on the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, Rules and the norms issued by the Government in this regard. A decision will be taken within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment by the petitioner after hearing the petitioners and after collecting evidence.” W.P.(C).NO.27809/08 :: 2 :: 2. The petitioners have a grievance that the direction issued in Ext.P6 has not been complied with. The remedy lies elsewhere. Subject to the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (V.GIRI) JUDGE sk/- //true copy// P.S. To Judge