IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH JUNE 2011 / 18TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 15394 of 2011(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- P.V.ANU, D/O.VARKY, PARACKAL HOUSE, CHEMPANTHOTTY P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.NARAYANAN SMT.M.R.JAYALATHA RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. STATE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER (DISTRICT OFFICER), KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, KANNUR. 2. ADDL. SECRETARY (APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER RTI ACT), KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, KPSC BY ADV. SRI.M.AJAY, SC, STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. W.P.(C) No.15394 OF 2011 ......................................................................... Dated this the 8th June, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner, who is stated as aggrieved of Exts. P1 and P2 proceedings issued by the first and second respondents respectively has preferred Ext. P3 appeal before the third respondent, which is stated as pending for more than six months. On receipt of Ext.P4 communication from the said respondent, it is stated that the petitioner has furnished the relevant particulars, despite which the matter is left unattended to. Even though the petitioner had filed Ext. P5, the same is not responded by the said respondent. Hence this writ petition. 2. Heard the learned Standing counsel for the third respondent, who submits that the delay was only because of non-compliance of the requirement as pointed out in Ext. P4, which is sought to be challenged by the petitioner by referring to the contents of Ext.P3 appeal, stating that the requirements have W.P.(C) No.15394 OF 2011 2 already been complied with. Considering the facts and circumstance, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the third respondent to consider and pass final orders on Ext. P3 appeal, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the third respondent for further steps. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk