1N THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATrISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No. 7’06 SK OF 2011 (I PETITIONER : Smt. Sushila Patel, W/o Shri Manohar Patel, aged about 33 years, Occupation-Housewife, R/o Village, Post & Police Station— Saria, District- Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1./ The State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the Secretary, Nagriya Prashashan Avam Vikas Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhawan, Ralpur (C.G.) 2. The Collector, Raigarh, District— Raigarh (C.G.) 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer (R), Sarangarh, District— Raigarh (C.G.) 4. The Naib Tahsldar, Circle Saria, Tahsil‘ Baramkela, District- Raigarh (C.G.) 5. The Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat- Saria, District- Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITIDIRECTION ‘39w HIGH COURT OF CHHA'ITISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NO.7065 OF 2011 (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Roop Naik, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri VVS Murthy, Dy. Adv. General with Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents and respondent/ Nagar Panchayat - Saria. O R D E R (Passed on this 15th day of December. 201 1) 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that the respondent authorities have decided to withdraw the impugned notice dated 18-11-2011 (Annexure — P/1), as no sufficient time was given, and if necessary fresh notice shall be issued affording proper opportunity of hearing to the respective person to put fonNard their case, if any. 2. In view of the above, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sdl— SATISH K. ANGNIHOTRI Judge PETITIONER Smt. Sushila Patel Versus RESPONDENTS The State of Chhattisgarh & Others