IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41020 of 2010 TRILOKINATH GUPTA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----- 02. 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. Petitioner is not the resident of the village from where illicit wine was recovered favours him, but there is no reason for his (petitioner’s) false implication and he (petitioner) is beyond approach of the police officials for a period of more than a decade. Number of pouches is one hundred five (105) of 200ml, if may favour the petitioner shall be taken into consideration in regular side. Accordingly, petitioner’s prayer for anticipatory bail stands rejected. However, petitioner is at liberty to surrender in the court below and pray for regular bail which shall be decided on its own merit without being prejudiced by this rejection order. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)