grg g XI-HC 78 m W (Wig) mwm Ww@wfs€rm avaimm APPuCANTs: (m Jam -V NON-APPLICANT: State of Chhattisgarh, through Poiiee station Nagamar, District Bastai'. (Petition under Section 482 of the 15.6.2005 passed in Cri Division Bench: HON. SHRI DHERENDRA NHSHRA & HON. SHRI DiLiP RAOSAHEB DES MUKH JJ 22-8-2008:- for the applicants. Shri Shravan Chandel, counse Shri DK. Gwalre. Govt. Advoc te for the State. Heard on LA. No.112008, application for condonatlon of delay in ming this petition, as the same has been pr ferreiiwvith a delay of 951 days. For the reasons indicated in th application, which is also supported by the affidavit of learned counsel for th appellants and which is not opposed by Shibo, S/o Chaitu Mahara, aged 3O years, R/o Viiiage JUnvani. Ramdas, Sfo Samer Mahara, age 35 years, Rio Village Junvani. Mahangu, Sfo Sahdeo, aged 25 years, R/e Wiage Chho’ce Dewda, JunvanL Shankar, 53/0 Chaituram Mahara, aged 27 years, Rlo‘ viHage Junvani, Distt. Bastar. ErSUS- Cr.P.C. for recalling the order dated minai Appeal No.74412003) A mm 111200 m w (Wu) Wmm WWWwW _ gr awimm Ban/e iearned counsel for the State, the $2 me is allowed. Delay in filing the petition is cendoned. Aiso heard on application passed in CLA. No.744/2003, wher by on the submission of learned counsel for the appellants that he wants to disposed of as withdrawn. From perusal of the record of Cr.A. No.744l2003, it is observed that on s on MCLP. Noi3203/2004, application for suspension of sentence and gran of baii. However, instead of disposing of MCrR No~3203l2004 as withdra inadvertently the appeai itself has been disposed of as withdrawn on the pra er of iearned counsel for the appeiiants. in view of the above fact, the rder dated 15-8-2005 is recalled and the order be read as MCrP. No.3203/2 O4 is disposed of aswithdrawn in place of the appeal is disposed of as withdra n. Copy of this order be pieced i the records of Cr.A. No.744/2093. mion is accordingly dis osed of that day the matter was fixed for o r r w M i