^^ HC-78 ^vS( ^i^ ic><i, u)-al<<-i<i<o, Rtrti^iy< -=— j^/r^^n^ ^^ f^ *11*1rtl WTT^ ......^..<....x...x.'.............v..^Fy-200 3I1^?T q^Zp (ijclljelc^) OT^^TcpT^Rtcy) HSTTOT^^T^^t^ ?^TT^T? ^Tf^T 3TT^$T PETITIONER: -Vel RESPONDENTS: (Writ Petition under Arti< Sinale Bench: Hon 25-11-2008:- Shri R.S. Patel, counsel for| Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advoc] Heard- Learned counseJ for the appointed as Panchayat Karm| Panchayat Binjoli, Block Makdl. h| under Section 69 (1) of the Pan| cpi^lojl-1 +ii+ioT^" f^^ci <<FJI^-CI^ ^3Tf^T3TT^$T Rajendra Prasad Baghet, S/o Shri Klrtsn Nath Baghel, aged about 30 years, Panchayat Karmi, Gram Panchayat Binjoii, Tahsii Kondgaon, Distt. Bastar/Jagdalpur (CG) sus- State of C.G., Through: its Secretary, Panchayat Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantraiaya, Raipur (CG). Deputy Dlrector, Panchayat Through Coiiector Bastar, Jagdaipur, Dlstt. Bastar (CG) ^. The Chief Executive Ofricer, Janpad Panchayat Makdl, Distt. Bastar/ Jagdaipur (CG) ^. The Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Binjoii Janpad Panchayat Makdi, Dlstt. Bastar/Jagdaipur (CG) kle 22S ofthe Constitutlon of Jndla) Ible Shri Dhirendra JVIishra, J. |the petitioner, tate for the-Sta.te/respondents No-1 & 2. |)etitioner submitted that the petitloner was on 3-11-1995 by the Sarpanch, Gram fe was subsequently appointed as Secretary |chayat Raj Adhiniyam by respondent No>2. IX111C-78 "•^ (£) *ii*i«ia?Tn^ ^wf T<4iqirt<4, U>Tn1<-l<l<»,fqoiliyx .l^f.f.S /..^f:.. .f.?£?./.6.?^200 3TT^9T CRcp (^ijel^) 3H^$Tc^f^rfc|7 cT^nan^^T^^itd) h-r-7-i Barve However, the Deputy Director, Bastar/Jagdalpur has withdrawn plowers of the Secretary under Section 69 (1) of the Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam v|ide order dated 11-5-2005, After wlthdrawai of powers of the Secretary, respj ailowing the petitioner to dischar^ counse! further submitted that h^ However, he may be permitted tc] No.4 for redressai of the grievar| cpi^foj1vi Tn^f^'f^St ^FJI^-CI>< ^3rf^T3TT^?T Panchayat and Social Weifare, District ^ndent No.4 Gram Panchayat Binjoli is not ie his duties as Panchayat Karmi. Learned is not pressing, this petitjon at this stage. fi!e fresh representation before respondent ices of the petitioner, who in turn may be further directed to decide his reprelsentation within speclfied period. Learned counsel for the St^te submitted that in case the petitloner fifes fresh representation for redressal| of his grsevances before respondent No.4, the same shail be considered anc| decided within a period of one month froin the date of receipt of representetic|n. In view of the submission r|nade by learned counsei for the parties, the instant petitlon is disposed of l^ith liberty to the petitioner to file fresh representatlon for redressai of his| grievances before respondent No,4 within a perjod of 7 days from today. C] petltloner, the same shal! be con^ jn accordance with law within a fl recelpt of representation. >n such representatlon being made by the idered by respondent No.4 on Its own merit jrther period of one month from the date of Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge