1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.3089 of 2010 (Sudhir D. Naik v. State of Maharashtra and another) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri S.G. Jagtap, Advocate for Petitioner. Smt. T.D. Khade, AGP for Respondent No.1. Shri V.G. Palshikar, Advocate for Respondent No.3. Coram : D.K. Deshmukh & R.K. Deshpande, JJ. Dated : 14 th September, 2010 The petitioner was Government servant. He had accepted misconduct. The only debate was whether the punishment was adequate. The punishment was in respect of recovery of some amount. Admittedly, the petitioner had carried out the work ignoring the sanctioned map and plan. In our opinion, once the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal has scrutinized the issue, it will not be appropriate to interfere in the petition. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Judge Judge pdl