IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRAPRADESH HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO.1671 OF 2009 DATE:14.12.2009 Between: M/s. Kayvee Enterprises, rep. By its Partner …… Petitioner And: Mr. Venudhar, Registrar,Osmania University, Hyderabad and 2 others …..Respondents. HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO.1671 OF 2009 ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 alleging that the respondents have violated the directions issued by this Court, by its order dated 24.08.2009 in W.P.No.16102 of 2009. The petitioner executed certain civil contract works to Genetics Building at Osmania University campus as per the agreement and received part payment and when the balance amount of Rs.2,12,515/- is not paid, the petitioner filed the main Writ petition. When it is the case of the petitioner that even after completion of execution of the work, the respondents are not releasing the bill amount, this Court disposed of the writ petition directing the respondents to release the amount payable to the petitioner. After passing of the order by this Court on 24.08.2009 in W.P.No.16102 of 2009, the respondents have released an amount of Rs.1,43,185/- vide cheque bearing No.343893 dated 29.08.2009, which was sent to the petitioner by registered post on 02.09.2009. It is further stated in the counter-affidavit that still an amount of Rs.33,000/- which is due to the petitioner is withheld towards the unattended works. The respondents have also named certain works which have not been completed by the petitioner and the petitioner was asked to complete the same. In view of the payment of the amount of Rs.1,43,185/- on 29.08.2009 made by the respondents on 29.08.2009 pursuant to the orders of this Court dated 24.08.2009 in W.P.No.16102 of 2009 , it cannot be said that the respondents have wilfully and deliberately violated the directions issued by this Court in the order dated 24.08.2009. Though it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the balance works have already been completed, the same cannot be enquired into in this Contempt Case. If the petitioner has already attended and completed the works which are referred to, it is for the petitioner to approach the respondents reporting compliance for payment of balance amount. But at the same time, it cannot be said that the respondents have violated the directions of this Court in order dated 24.08.2009 in the writ petition No.16102 of 2009. For the aforesaid reasons, it is open for the petitioner to approach the respondents for payment of balance of amount and complying the un- attended works as per the agreement. Accordingly the Contempt Case is closed. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY,J Date:14.12.2009. Gk. HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO.1671 OF 2009 DATE:14.12.2009 GK.