C.R. No. 431 of 2011 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 431 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 4, 2011 Sat Narain …..Petitioner Vs. Smt.Kalawati and others …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.Ajay Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) The plaintiff has preferred this revision petition against the order dated December 14, 2010 dismissing the prayer of the plaintiff- petitioner to incorporate the date of judgment and decree in Civil Suit No. 1034 of 1994 which has been challenged in the suit. The lower Appellate Court has framed composite issue No.2 mentioning various judgments and decrees which have been challenged by the plaintiff- petitioner regarding which the parties are on issue. C.R. No. 431 of 2011 (O&M) [2] Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner- plaintiff merely wants to incorporate the details of the civil suit which has been challenged. He claims that issue No.2 should contain a wording ‘… …judgment and decree dated November 9, 1994 in Civil Suit No. 1034 of 1994 titled Smt.Natho etc. Vs. Sat Narain……’ are null and void. I have heard counsel for the petitioner and gone through the facts and circumstances of this case including the original plaint filed by the petitioner. The petitioner has challenged the validity of various judgments and decrees including the abovesaid judgment and decree dated November 9, 1994 passed in Civil Suit No. 1034 of 1994 titled Smt.Natho and others Vs. Sat Narain. The judgment and decree passed in Civil Suit No. 1034 of 1994 has already been placed on the record by the parties as DW2/C and DW2/D. Both the contesting parties are aware of the fact that the abovesaid judgment and decree is subject matter of the dispute and that the parties are on issue regarding the validity of the abovesaid decree. When both the parties are aware of the dispute and there is documentary evidence already produced on the record making it abundantly clear to both the parties as to what judgment and decree has been passed in Civil Suit No. 1034 of 1994, it will not be necessary to elaborate the details of the suit with title and date of decision. It is admitted fact that there is no other civil suit with number 1034 of 1994 decided between Smt.Natho etc. and Sat Narain passed by the Court of Sh.A.K. Verma, Sub Judge, Ist Class, Hissar. It will be deemed that parties are aware of the controversy. No illegality has been committed by the trial Court in dismissing the application. No ground is made out for C.R. No. 431 of 2011 (O&M) [3] issuance of any direction in the exercise of powers under Section 227 of the Constitution of India. Dismissed. February 4, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE