vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.70 OF 2009 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.70 OF 2009 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.70 OF 2009 IN IN IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.167 OF 1999 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.167 OF 1999 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.167 OF 1999 Niyaz Ahmed Parkar ... Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr.Shirshat Chavan h/f S.M. Oak for Applicant Ms.P.P.Shinde, APP, for Respondent CORAM: A.R. JOSHI, J. A.R. JOSHI, J. A.R. JOSHI, J. DATED: APRIL 1, 2009 APRIL 1, 2009 APRIL 1, 2009 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Perused the papers. Heard the advocate for the petitioner. It appears that earlier on two occasions Criminal Revision Application No.1 of 1999 was dismissed by this Court and again on the application of the petitioner, it was restored. The last dismissal was on 6.1.2009 which was for default on the part of the petitioner to appear. It is curious to note as to what is the grievance made in the dismissed Criminal Revision Application NO.167 of 1999 and for which the petitioner is prosecuting this matter for 10 years. Under section 179 of the Indian Penal Code, there was a conviction of the accused passed on 7.11.1998 by the JMFC, Murud and was sentenced to suffer Simple Imprisonment for two months and to pay a fine of Rs.500/-. The said conviction was challenged before the Additional Sessions : 2 : Judge, Raigad in Criminal Appeal NO.33 of 1998 wherein on 5.6.1999, the order was modified and the sentence reduced to 11 days which was already undergone by the accused, the present petitioner. The quantum of fine of Rs.500/- was maintained and it was already deposited on 17.11.1998. At the present time, after nine years of prosecuting this matter, Criminal Revision filed before this Court came to be dismissed on two occasions and once it was restored. Under these circumstances, in the opinion of this Court, there is nothing now to again restore the matter and reagitate the issue which is almost 10 to 11 years old. hence, the present application is rejected and accordingly disposed of.