IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA^PUR CONTEMPT COMPLAINANT PETITIONER ,^r^( '".f-.C^-" ^^ >-^'" ^ ^ffiNTEMNER RSPONDENT N06. Dineshwari Rawat wife of Chauhan Singh Rawat aged 21 years resident of village Podaguda Block and Tahsil Devbhog District Raipur ( C.G.) VERSUS A.K.Biswal Project officer, Integrated Child Development project Devbhog Distt Raipur (C.G.) APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 12 READ WITH SECTION 14LOF THECONTEMPT ACT 1971. ^^^2^^, if XI-HC—78 3^T^Tf^F ?f8TT W^ 5b^{<^ Praveen *1T*«vir^rW^ 'S^S '•^TfSfM^T, 'y>tli^4l<o, [s«rft<y^< ^^..€6.^.C^.£C2J.£'^ 200 3TT<^T -qT^ (^j^KT) ^TTW^f^ srr^r ^SB : Hon'ble ShrlMaiaindra S.9.2011 Shri R.V. Rajwade, cou4sel Shri Ashish Shukla, coilnsel Heard. This contempt petition willful disobedience ofthe ordB ^ias been field by the petitioner alleging ?r date 20th November, 2010. Learned counsel for th^ the order of the Court wab December, 2010 and the rep| decided vide order dated 9. time stipulated. < Inview offhe aforesaid] proceed farfher ia the matte^ beeu committed. The rule is fherefore disposed of, however, reser^iag recourse to such remedy as against the order dated 9.12./£ <3hM(<n<fl<i 'Frm^ff "^ 'fe^ft <r^^i< ^ ^ffW ^3?1^T Mohan Shriva^EavaTJT for fhe petitioner. for fhe respondent. respondeut submits that fhe copy of ser^ed cn the respondent ou 2nd ijresentation of the petitioner has been 12.2010 (Annexure R-1/1) within the |subniission made, I am not inclined to ^ as no contempt can be said to have (jlischarged and fhe petition is finaUy liberty to the petitioner to take |2iay be available to her under the law fiOlO (Annexure R-l/l), SAI-.s <asta<9 x^O^ ^«Wdta"i»ASe