IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.3552 of 2008 Between: Jilakarra Pedda Subbaiah S/o.Nagaiah R/o.Penagalur villge & Mandal, Kadapa District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Kadapa, Kadapa District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajampet, Kadapa District. 3 The Tahsildar, Penagalur Village & Mandal, Kadapa District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in trying to evict the petitioner from the hut and land in an extent of 5 cents in Survey No.37/2 of Penagalur village and Mandal, Kadapa District, without canceling the assignment and without following the due process of law, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.G.DASARADHA RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.3552 OF 2008 ORDER: Petitioner was assigned house site admeasuring Acs.0.05 in survey No.37/2 situated at Pengalur village in Kadapa District. He constructed a thatched house. He filed writ petition alleging that third respondent is interfering with his lawful possession without due process of law. He seeks a direction to third respondent not to interfere with his possession without canceling patta after following due process of law. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (General- Andhra Area), after getting instructions, submits that petitioner is residing in the house site allotted to him and the allegation that third respondent interfering with his possession is not correct. The same is recorded and the writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ____________ (V.V.S.RAO,J) November 26, 2008 YS To 1 The District Collector, Kadapa, Kadapa District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajampet, Kadapa District. 3 The Tahsildar, Penagalur Village & Mandal, Kadapa District. 4. Two CCs to Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. (OUT) 3. Two C.D. Copies.