wp10966.10 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.10966 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri.D.B. Pawar Advocate for Petitioner. Shri.N.R. Shaikh, A.G.P. for Respondents. .... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE : 28TH FEBRUARY, 2011. 1. Heard. The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner society, in response to advertisement, has been submitting proposals since the year 2006 onwards. The Petitioner society had started running library, even though the State Government did not accept the proposal. The Petitioner now claims grant-in-aid by the State in respect of public library. 2. The learned A.G.P. on instructions, wp10966.10 2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders submits that Parbhani District is having population of near-about 3,00,000. Fourteen libraries are already running in the said District and probably two libraries are in excess of the required number of percentage of quota allotted. 3. Even otherwise, in absence of any specific permission granted by the State, the Petitioner is not entitled to claim grant-in-aid. There is no merit in the Petition. The Writ Petition is dismissed. 4. In case, in future the State invites application, the Petitioner is entitled to participate in the process. [S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.] [NARESH H.PATIL,J.] asb/FEB11/wp10966.10