IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39418 of 2010 KALLU RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 20.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner, namely, Kallu Rai seeks his bail in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 62 of 2010 registered under Sections 302, 120B/34 of the I.P.C. and 27 of the Arms Act. Admittedly, petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. It appears from perusal of the impugned order of learned Additional Sessions Judge-XI that except the confessional statement of co- accused, there is nothing against the petitioner on the entire case diary. In the aforesaid circumstance, above named petitioner (Kallu Rai), is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M, Danapur, Patna in connection with above stated Danapur P.S. Case No. 62 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)