1 CP-94-10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 94 OF 2009 Javed Ahmed Budhan Shaikh & Anr. ... Petitioners Vs. Nandkumar Jantre & anr. ... Respondents Mr. M.V.Chougule, i/b. Mr. S.G.Kudle,Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. R.S.apte, Senior Counsel, i/b. Mr. A.R.Pitale,Advocate for the respondent No. 1. Mr. A.I.I.Patel, AGP, for the respondent No.2. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 14th October, 2010. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. By order dated 23.10.2008 in Public Interest Litigation No.128 of 2008, the Division Bench of this Court had recorded the statement of the Counsel for the Corporation that they would examine the averments made in the PIL and pass appropriate order in accordance with law and their policy within six weeks. No further order was passed. Even though the Contempt Petition is filed, nothing is pointed out how the contempt is committed of the Court's order. The petition stands dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)