mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4945 of 2008 Smt.Daksha D. Naik & Anr. .. Petitioners versus Mr.Mahendra T. Naik & ors. .. Respondents ... Mr.P.K. Mishra for the petitioners. Mr.Suresh Gole for respondent nos.2 to 4. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J DATED : 26th August 2008 P.C.: 1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. It is well established position that even if the document has been exhibited by the trial court, the question whether the said document is admissible or not will have to be considered by the trial court at the appropriate stage. If the document is not admissible in law, the fact that it has been given exhibit number makes no difference. Giving the exhibit number does not mean that the document and more particularly the contents thereof has been proved. That is a matter which will have to be considered after taking into account all the relevant evidence in that behalf. Besides, it will be open to the petitioner to make grievance about the correctness of the view taken by the trial court in the substantive appeal to be filed by the petitioners in the event the suit is decided against them. All questions in that behalf will have to be considered at the appropriate stage. 3. Petition disposed of in the above terms. (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)