IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10926 of 2010 KAMLESH SINGH, Son of Late Bilat Singh, Resident of Village Ranauli, P.s. Bathnaha, District – Sitamarhi ….. Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … Opposite Party ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sujit Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Uma Shankar Pd. Singh, A.P.P. ------- 3 12.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 354, 364, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3(X) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the daughter of Gandhi Singh fell in love with Arun Baitha, and eloped with him to Nepal. However, it is submitted that the petitioner is neither a family member of Gandhi Singh nor has been alleged to have kidnapped his daughter. Learned counsel submits that there is nothing to show direct involvement of this petitioner except that he has been named with 12 other person in the first information report. Co-accused Jitu Singh and Satyendra Singh, Rakesh Singh and Lal Babu - 2 - Singh and Ravindra Singh have already been granted bail by order dated 19.10.2005 , 23.11.2005 and 27.1.2006 passed in Cr. Misc. Nos. 33978 of 2005, 42629 of 2005 and 43775 of 2005 respectively. Petitioner is stated to be in custody since 1.8.2009. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, KAMLESH SINGH, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the 1st Addl. Sessions Judge cum Special Judge, SC /ST Act, Sitamarhi in connection with S.Tr. No. 87 of 2006 arising out of Bathnaha P.S. Case No. 111 of 2003, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be a close relative or family member of the petitioner, who shall file affidavit before the concerned court giving complete genealogy to show his or her relationship with the petitioner. Further, the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of trial. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation then the court - 3 - concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)