hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1155 OF 2010 IN CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 4708 OF 2008 Ashwini Ravindra Tingare ... Applicant Versus Ravindra R. Tingare ... Respondent Mr. Nilesh M. Wable li/by Mr. Umesh Mankapure, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Vaibhav R. Gaikwad i/by Mr. A.M. Kulkarni, Advocate for Respondents. CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR,J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 24, 2010 P.C. The grievance made in this application is that, taking advantage of the consent terms filed in the writ petition, on the basis of which writ petition came to be disposed of on 27.07.2008, the respondent has not discharged his obligation of paying arrears of maintenance amount. In the circumstances, applicant has prayed that order passed on 11.8.2008 be recalled. Needless to observe that the controversy in writ petition was only limited to providing access of the child to the respondent and his parents. The settlement between the parties therefore, was only with regard to that issue. The disposal of the writ petition does not preclude the applicant from pursuing her claim for arrears of maintenance amount, if any. She will be entitled to pursue that claim in appropriate court by taking recourse to proceedings as may be advised. Save and except this clarification, it is not necessary to recall the order dated 11.8.2008 which ought to bind the parties in so far as the arrangement provided therein regarding access to the minor child. Application disposed of in the above terms. (A.M. KHANWILKAR,J.)