IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 15734 of 2008 Between: Bejjiki Sathi Reddy Alias Benjjenki Sathaiah S/o.Chandraiah Alias Chendra Reddy Siddipet(V)&(M) Medak District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector Medak District at Sanga Reddy 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer Siddipet(M) Medak District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of the 2nd respondent in not diposing the petitioner's petiton dt.07-02-2008 as illegal arbitrary unconstitutional and consequently directing the 2nd respondent to dispose my petition dt.07-02-2008 on merits after enquiry and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:G.TIRUPATHI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.15734 OF 2008 ORAL ORDER: The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that he filed a petition dated 07.02.2008 before the second respondent, namely, the Mandal Revenue Oﬃcer, Siddipet Mandal, Medak District, requesting him to rectify the wrong entries made in the pahanies in respect of land admeasuring Ac.1.26 ½ guntas in Survey No.1939/A situated at Siddipet Village and Mandal, Medak District, but so far no orders thereon had been passed. Hence, he filed the present writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submitted that petition seeking rectiﬁcation of entries in the record of rights shall be ﬁled within a period of one year from the date of notiﬁcation published to that eﬀect in the Andhra Pradesh Gazette or the District Gazette, as the case may be. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has come to know about the wrong entries made in the pahanies in the month of January, 2008 and immediately thereafter the petition dated 07.02.2008 has been ﬁled before the second respondent seeking rectification of the same. In view of the above, without going into the merits of the matter, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition itself at the stage of admission with the following directions: The second respondent, namely, Mandal Revenue Oﬃcer, Siddipet Mandal, Medak District, is directed to consider and dispose of the petition dated 07.02.2008 ﬁled by the petitioner for rectiﬁcation of the entries made in the pahanies in respect of the land in question and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law expeditiously. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J. Date: 22.07.2008 VGSR