IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SLA No.86 of 2008 PRAFUL CHANDRA TIWARY Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. SATYENDRA PRAKASH UPADHYAY. For the petitioner : Dr. Amrendra Kumar no. 1, Advocate. For the O.P. no. 1 : Mr. Digvijay Kumar Ojha, Advocate. ----------- 4 17.03.2009 Heard both sides on the point of admission.. There appears to be a delay of about one year in filing the appeal. Even if the application seeking condonation of delay is allowed, this Court finds no merit in the application seeking leave. This Court finds that adequate reason has been assigned by the learned Trial Court in different paragraphs of the judgment including paragraph 12. No patent illegality has been committed by the Court below. The application seeking leave to appeal stands rejected. I.A. No. 2582 of 2008 is also accordingly disposed of. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )