IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-31578 of 2009 Date of Decision:10.3.2010 Rajiv Krishan Khanna .... Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. R.S. Rai, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gautam Dutt, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. The present petition has been moved for seeking direction to the trial court i.e. the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Amritsar in criminal case No.57 of 2008 to release the passport of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the judgment passed by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Suresh Nanda v. CBI 2008(1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 897. In any case, vide order of even date passed by this Court in connected case i.e. Criminal Misc. No.4008-M of 2010, order dated 12.9.2005 (Annexure P-2) has been modified with the direction that the petitioners are allowed to travel abroad as and when required subject to the following conditions: i)The petitioners shall furnish a bank guarantee of Rs.5,00,000/- which will be kept alive till the final disposal of the case. ii)The petitioners shall inform the trial Court about their traveling plan. iii)The petitioners shall make themselves available and present as and when required by the trial court for the purpose of trial. CRM M-31578 of 2009 -2- Thus, in view of the facts recorded in order dated 12.9.2005 passed in Crl. M. No.4008-M of 2010, the present petition is disposed of with the direction to the trial court to release the passport of the petitioner. 10.3.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE