,...^3S^$ ^q^p^.- ?.'* ptes' ^•\-"1" c^- 1 ^o^ ^e6-"" IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISeARH AT: BILASPUR W. P. (Sl No. ^3^ OF 2009 PETITIONER: Jhul Ram Dhurwe, aged 50 years, son of Shri Shahad Ram Dhunve, Daily wages labourer, Kashthagar Madna depot, Gaurela Forest Range, Forest division Marwahi, district Bilaspur (C.G.). RESPONDENTS: /(l) StateofChhattisgarh,throughthe Secretary, department ofForest, Raipur. ^(2) The Conservator of Forest, Bilaspur Forest Circle, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh). /(3) The Divisional Forest Officer, Marwahi forest division, Pendraroad, district Bilaspur (C.G^.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 228 OF TH@ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ^j^ "SfTj 'f^Tc?':' ^m ^T^ iCTN: ! W^R'il ^t^l^i -^^ <^r^p7[7?^ ^i^^^. f^roy ^....w-.e-.cs.i^.^/......^^^ 3T?^T -q5R? {^q^t») ITCTW ^fer -sTr^ 8B : HON'BLB 8HRIJUSTICE KRITINKBRDIWAKBR 27.07.2009 Shri Somnath Verma^ coujnsel for the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Sing^ Tha^ur, Dy. A.G, with Smt. Smita Ghai, P.L. fortheState. Counsel for the petition^sr wants to withdraw the present petition. He however submits respondent No.2 for deciding petitioner dated 15.7.2008 8s 6.7) Counsel for the State hasl petition with liberty as aforesai< ^Nwih WR^B ^' fixA ^f^n ^ ^fwa^l that direction may be issued to :he pending representations of the 2009 (Annexure P/4 8s P/5). no objection if the representation of the petitioner is decided in aocor^iance with law. Accordingly^ the petitio^er is permitted to withdraw the . It is expected from the concemed authority that the pending r4>resentations of the petitioner be decided in accordance with law. It is made clear that this pourt has not expressed any opinion on merits and the authority Iwould be at liberty to decide the representation strictly in accordajnce with law. - ——— Sd/- pritinker Diwaker Judge ^ ;v^i^^-:w'-:sf.f'^--i^^y'i^-:^sv^^