IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.197 of 2010 GUDDU KUMAR Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 03.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. A Bolero is stolen from informant’s house. Admittedly, till today the only evidence involving petitioner is the statement of one Ghutar Rai could be leading to recovery if vehicle in question would have been recovered. In confession, duplicate key of the vehicle was handed over to this petitioner in the night at 2.30 am. Neither the vehicle is recovered, nor charge-sheet is submitted against this petitioner and the matter is under investigation. Petitioner’s arrest may facilitate investigation about having a confession leading to recovery. So, I find it not a proper stage to allow the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is rejected. However, petitioner is directed to surrender before the Court below and pray for regular bail in connection with Suryagarha P.S. Case No. 363 of 2008 pending in the Court of C.J.M., Lakhisarai. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)