IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32484 of 2009 ZAHID HUSSAIN @ ZAHID HASSAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, for the State and for the Complainant. In this application under Section 498A, 323 of the Penal Code and Section 4 of the dowry Prohibition Act, the submission is that there is no serious or heinous allegation against him as husband. Opposing the prayer for bail, learned counsel for the complainant submits that the petitioner was not complying the maintenance order passed by the court below, for which she has adequate statutory remedy. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, abovenamed be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/-(Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.P. Kumar, S.D.J.M., Sitamarhi in CI/428/2008 (Trial No. 1754/09). AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)