1 C.P.420.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 420 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5239 OF 2011 [Smt. Surekha Prabhakar Bondar Vs. The State of Maharashtra and another] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr.P.V.Jadhavar,Advocate for petitioner. Mr.D.V.Tele,AGP for respondent No.1. Mr.S.W.Munde,Advocate for Respondent No.4. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 19TH OCTOBER, 2011 PER COURT : . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Transfer is incident of service. It is contention of the petitioner that directions given by this Court has not been complied with by the respondent Zilla Parishad, within time. The case of the petitioner for transfer is not considered within time. 2 C.P.420.11 2. The learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.4-Zilla Parishad makes a statement that preferences from the interested employees are called for their transfer and in due course Zilla Parishad will take appropriate steps. 3. In that view of the matter, nothing further survives for consideration in the contempt petition and the same stands disposed off. Notice stands discharged. Sd/- [S.S. SHINDE, J.] MTK