IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.8437/2010 Date of decision:27.1.2011. Ashok Kumar and another .............Petitioners v Meghana Oberoi ..............Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present:- Mr.HK Aurora,Advocate for the petitioners Jaswant Singh,J(Oral). Petitioners/ Grand parents have approached this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 25.11.2010 passed by learned Guardian Judge, Panchkula whereby their application seeking visiting rights for meeting their grand son aged 5½ years has been declined. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that though the father of the child has been granted visiting rights as per terms and conditions of the mutual divorce between him and his wife, whereby the father/son of the petitioners has been granted the custody of minor child for half of the periods of summer/winter vacations, however, the petitioners seek their independent right to visit the child. After hearing the learned counsel, I find no illegality or perversity in the impugned order. Learned Guardian Judge has rightly observed that petitioners/grand parents can meet and visit the child whenever he is in the house of his father i.e. son of the petitioners. It has nowhere come on the record that relations between the petitioners and their son are strained to the extent that he has denied them any such visiting rights. For the reasons stated above, present revision petition stands dismissed. 27.1.2011. (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge