^€-\^l IN I'HE HON'BLE WIGSl COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) N0. ^00° /2010 PETITIONER RESPONDBNTS -^~.. ^ sy ~9f Sujeet Kumar Sarkar, S/o Shri R.R. Sarkar, aged about 40 years, Head Master, Primary School, Naveen Niyanar, Block Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS r" :1. State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer, Jagdalpur, Distt.- Bastar (C.G.) 3. Vishwajeet Banerjee, Head Master, Govt. Primary School, Manjhiguda, Block Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ^<€- .<)?wr ^y /V^/F'^ChV .y. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WMT PETmON (S) No. 4000 of2010 Sujeet Kumar Saikar. RE8PONDENTS VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRTT PETTnON UNDER ARIICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aenihotri. J. Present: Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Sfari P.K-Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. None forthe respondent No. 3, despite sen'ice ofnotice. ORDERfORAL) (Passed on 14th day ofJuly, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the State/respondent No. I and 2 submits ttet the petitioner has already eontinued at the original place ofposting for more than 11 months on account ofinterim order granted by tiris Court 02.08.2010. The State/respondent No. 1 and 2 may be granted Uberty to pass appropriate orders keeping ia view public interest and administrative exigency. Shri Bhaduri fiirther suhmits that the State/respondent No. 1 and 2 shall not insist upon eompliance of the vaapugaed order dated and 15.07.2010 (Annexure P/l) in respect ofthe petitioner. 2. At this stage, when no efFeet eould be given to the impugned order dated 15.07.2010 (Amiexure P/l) on aecoimt ofthe interim order dated 02.08.2010, thus, it is not necessary to go into legality and validity ofthe aforestated impugned orders. 3. In view of the above, according to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge