[iv 7 ' 3 “7 a” by IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ’/— : /Ku Jyoti Sarva, aged about 30 years Daughter of Late Sadaram Sarva R/o Vlllage Sasahoh Tah511 Tllda Post Neora, Distt. Raipur (C.G.), ‘ VERSUS A. State of C G through Secretary Educatlon, Ralpur \x a. D. E. orgahpgm /3§ State of M.P. through _ Secretary Education, Bhopal. Union of India, through Director Ministry of Personal Tralmng & Publlc Grievances (State Reorganrsation Cell) Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi 70F PETITIONER WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/22 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Hon'ble Chief Justice & Hié i Companion’ Judges of CuGgHigh Court @ HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARI-I : BILA$PUR SINGLE BENCH : HON’BLE SHRI SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. WRIT PETITION NO. 4847 of 2004 Petitioner Ku. Jyoti Sa1va Veisus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and others Present : Shri Ashok Soni, counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Government Advocate for the respondents No. 1 and 2. None for the respondent No. 3. Shri S.K. Beriwal, Standing counsel for the respondent No. 4f Union of India. ORAL ORDER (20th Aprn, 2006) v 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the/daughter of Smt. Dulati Bai, who was working as Head Mistress in Primary School Simga, District—Raipur. Smt. Dulaii Bai was died in harness on 15.2.2000 2. The petitioner, being dependant—legal heir of the deceased nled an application immediately thereafter for compassionate appointment before the District Education O$cer, Raipur. The said application was not considered on the ground that the death has occurred before creation of new State of Chhattisgarh. Accordingly, the case of the petitioner was rejected by order dated 13. 10.2004 (Annexuie P/ 1). The State of Chhattisgarh, by its circular dated 2.2.2006, has OJ directed all the departments to consider cases of all the eligible dependant-legal‘heir of the employees, Who died in harness 5g between 1.11.1997 to 31‘102000 for compassionate appoimment. 4. Accordingly, the State Government is dimcted to consider the case of the petitioner as per its own cimular dated 2.2.2006 and also in view of the order dated 20.12.2005 passed by this Court in W.P. No. 1322/ 2002 and other connected matters on its own merit, in accordance with law, on such representation being Eed by the petitioner. 5. For the reasons stated-above, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Certified copy as per Rules. /’// .1 Sd/_ f ‘f Sam's}! K- Agnihotni J Rx Judge / J ’