.[1]. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1897 OF 1994 Baban Jalindar Zombale and Anr. ...Petitioners. Versus Chief Metropolitan Magistrate and Anr. ...Respondents. .... Ms.Neeta Tekriwala i/b. I.P.Bagaria, Advocate for the Petitioners. Ms.S.M.Dandekar, A.G.P. for the State-Respondents. .... CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 06, 2006. DECEMBER 06, 2006. DECEMBER 06, 2006. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.P. for the respondents. 2. Both the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.P. for the respondents categorically state that the facts and circumstances in the instant case are identical to that in Writ Petition No.1680 of 1994, which was .[2]. disposed of by this Court on 7th September, 2004. 3. Under these circumstances, in view of the Judgment in Writ Petition No.1680 of 1994 the present petitioners are also entitled to be treated as permanent employees and are entitled to all the benefits which the permanent employees are entitled to. 4. Rule is made absolute accordingly. 5. Issuance of certified copy expedited. [DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]