THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4619 of 2011 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the defendant in O.S.No.19 of 2009, which is filed by the respondent herein for recovery of money based on a pro-note alleged to have been executed at Parkal, Warangal District. Petitioner/defendant has filed I.A.No.605 of 2009 under Order VII Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection of plaint on the ground that the Court below lacks territorial jurisdiction, as the respondent/plaintiff is a resident of Kukatpally, Hyderabad. The Court below, in view of the statement mentioned in the plaint that the suit document is executed at Parkal, which is within its territorial jurisdiction, has rejected the said application. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner/defendant that as the respondent/plaintiff is a resident of Kukatpally, Hyderabad, there is no territorial jurisdiction to the Court below to try the suit filed by him. It is to be noted that rejection of plaint can only be in the circumstances as notified in Order VII Rule 11 CPC. When it is the case of the respondent/plaintiff that the suit pro- note is executed at Parkal, which is within the limits of Warangal District, aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner/defendant is no ground for rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. In that view of the matter, the Civil Revision Petition is devoid of merit and it is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 18th NOVEMBER, 2011. kvni