IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.11421 of 2008. Decided on: 20.12.2010. Beli Ram. ……….Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Mr. Puneet Rajta, Advocate, vice Mr. K.D.Shreedhar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M.Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. J.S.Guleria, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Mr. Puneet Rajta, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 20, 2010. (krt) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.