^ ^- vD c ^ 1 L INTHEHGHOOURTOFCHHATnSGARHJUraCATURE: HLASPUR MTSC. APPEALNO. /2003 APPELLANT INSORmi /" ^ I3QVER ^ ywj»j^»ja OWNER RESPONESENTS .CLAIMANTS /•-^' ^•^r K^"' ^ ^s^ ^^ ^\^ <?>^0 ^^ ^ Ulvlsjon Bench NaticaMlInsun nceCSonq Aiaiuiui.^^ v-^Aiyeui^ Thioi^i: Its Btendi Nfanqger, Bla^ur (aihaltisgaih) VERSUS- z" ^" 1). MikundramYadsty S/oChhitruram Yadw, Qiver Aged about 27 years, R/o \^Uage Karpavad» P.S.Nqgamar,Tdistt: J^dalpur, DbstBastar. 2). EhagwanSm^iTlifiasur, S/o Narottam^n^i Thaian; R/oViU^ePtihutbd. Tdisil: Jagdalpur, Dlst Bastar aihattisgsdi. 3). Smt. Anusuiya W/o Lste Shri RDOpnafli Aged about 36 yesrs 4). KiLUmnla. D^o Late Shn Roppnafc, Aged aibout 5 years^ Nfiiaor 'nuot^i:Mofeier Guanfian aiifcAnusuiya 5). Sudru, S/o Somya, Aged about61 years 6). Laxmi, W/o Sudru, '" Ag8dabout56years. AU R/o ^UqgeSemragud^ P.S. Karparad, Tdial: Js^pw, Dbstt. Bastar(Chhatti%aih) ^^^^^^^^.^^^.^^ ^. ""•? -1-- w-" tfVEAL UNDR SECHCa^ 173 Cy' VEHICLEACT. XI-HC.22 ^H^T^FT R^i<=h ^^ sh^w ^fid ^ ^ +- -3^r ^INH^, ^xii^^Ko, ^«ni^y an^r x[?ra? ^.:A.:>io.^7£0^^^ \^A.K ^ ^ ^v WH<?11 ^b*11<=h ^ /20(l3 '^R^T' ^H^I^HW^T CDN(<y1<flT1 H\H^\\ ^ fST3t ^^K ^a?rf^TH3H^T b8: Hon'ble Shr-i A.S.V. MocHhy. C.J. and Hon'ble Shri L.C. BHadoo. J. 1-9-Z004 Heard Shri Sanjay K- A9r4wal/counsel for the appctlants* This order shall govem fie disposal of M.A. Nos. 975/2003 and 978/2003. On 5-5-2001 one Rupnath The motorcycle, when the bevangan WOLS 9oing to Jagdlapur in ItracTor bearing registration No. C.P.T./2461 which came from t^e oppo^ite direction dashed against the said motorcycle. ftupnatii D^vangon was thrown out <xnd he died. ^The first wife of deceased b^vangan filed a claim case claiming feompensation. The ^econd wifej father and mother of the deceased filed a separate claim. Both fhese cases were disposed of by a common order, The Trib^nal fixed the compensation of fts.1,51,000/-. Questioning th| Insurance Company has filed M./| Learned counsel for th^ relevdnt time the tractor wal e correctness of this order, the . Nos.975/2003 and 978/2003. oppellant submitted that at the s not insured with the Insurouice Company. However, we find 1^at no matsridls have been placed before this Court in this regard. As far as The quantum js concerned, though it is claimed that the same is on higher side, lecjrnect counsel has not demonstrated ['cn^ w^} / ^ XI-HC-22 3TI^T^T h-\\^ y^[ $b^ich ^f^a ^••s >. Barve/Soma T5? •^WMZf, '^NT1^, l°i^i<ii< 3TT^?T 'CTST^ e) . ^..A.^1:1Z WWTT^^IIch 20ftS •^[^i' ^T^T^PtTW^T ^L Ifind how it is so, In fact, we are ofl has been fixed by The Tribunal i^ In the result, we do not| and the same are dismissed. Consequently, A^(C,)P. i^ 9718/2003,9721/2003 & 9722/12003 Sd/- Justice chi^<fli ^m^f Tf afelst <f^^'.< '^3?rf^R^3^T the view that the compensation that somewhat on the lower side. ouny substance in these appeals, ;v.l544/2003, I.A. NOS.9717/Z003. stand di^posed of, Sd/- L.C.BHADOO Judge [Ttt^^ITn ^