IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.7734 of 2011 Dinesh Parkash Vs. Haryana Urban Development Authority, Panchkula & others Present: Mr.Madan Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner complains that respondent No.4 has encroached the road. For this, he had approached the official respondents, who have issued notice to respondent No.4, but no further action is being taken. In case, respondent No.4 has encroached some public land, it would be the responsibility of the official respondents to seek ejectment/eviction of the said respondent. The official respondents are required to act in accordance with law. In case, they failed to do so, the petitioner has an alternative efficacious remedy of approaching appropriate forum for seeking ejectment or eviction of respondent No.4 from the encroachment that she has made. The disputed questions of fact normally cannot be gone into by a writ jurisdiction. The representation filed by the petitioner may be considered and appropriate order passed in accordance with law. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. May 03, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE