1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1645 OF 2010. Govindrao Deorao Bondre -: VERSUS :- Pundlik Jagoji Dhokane and 2 others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : AUGUST 04, 2010. Heard Shri S. Malode, learned Counsel for petitioner, Shri V.S. Kukdey, learned Counsel for respondent no.1, Shri M.I.Dhatrak, learned Counsel for respondent no.2 and Shri A.D. Mohgaonkar, learned Counsel for respondent no.3. Learned Counsel points out that licence to run flour mill given to respondent no.1 was canceled and inspite of that cancellation, he has continued to run flour mill. Trial Court therefore granted temporary injunction in favour of petitioner and restrained him [respondent no.1] from so doing. The Appellate Court has reversed that order and 2 hence during the pendency of suit respondent no.1 is permitted to operate his flour mill. According to Shri Kukdey, learned Counsel who appears for respondent no.1 licencee, respondent no.1 never received any order of revocation of licence. Shri Dhatrak, learned counsel for respondent no.2 Municipal Council has during arguments pointed out that on 18.10.2005 respondent no.1 himself applied to Municipal Council to recall that order of revocation of licence, and he therefore states that the contention that notice was never served upon respondent no.1 is incorrect. In this situation, the learned counsel for petitioner states that the suit pending before the trial Court should be expedited so that all the issues can be tried in one stroke. The learned Counsel appearing for Municipal Council as also the MSEDCL have no objection if the suit is expedited. In the circumstances, proceedings in Regular Civil Suit No. 38/2008 on the file of Civil Judge, Junior Division, Katol are expedited. That Court is directed to decide the suit as early as possible and in any case within a period of 6 months from the date of communication of this order to it. The plaintiff as well as the defendant no.1 shall 3 not claim any adjournment on the ground that their Advocates are not available. With these directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Parties are directed to appear before the trial Court on scheduled date i.e. on 07.08.2010. JUDGE Rgd.