yv •^ yw&wL€wmS WC ^^ 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. No. ^^ /2005 PETITIONER ^ ./::y ^;y....a .^-^•••••"" ^.<ri^....--' so- '..'•"". .->"b *'?.-''' ...-"' ^\l?lx'° ..^'^?%y' y^^ .** ^.^•' •'^" RESPONDENTS Dr. Harcharan Singh Bhatia, Aged about 43 years, S/o. Sardar M.S. Bhatia, Assistant Professor, Governnient Nehru Degree CoUege, Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon,R/o. Buddwaripara, Dongargarh, Distt.Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS 1. •^"^ ^.y^^ ./^..^•-' '""yy^ /..^~~%^ K^-^ IA ;. l.<^ n's ^j ";s^"- fp^ State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Higher Education Mantralay, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C<G.) Commissioner Higher Education Directorate, Government Science College Premises, Raipur. President Public Service Commission, Office at Raipur. Principal Government Nehru College, Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon (C.G,). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/ CERTIORARI, ETC. OR DIRECTION / ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. *ll*jc»l^mq» \sw{ '^i«io«,u>-al1<-i<i<», RlAl^y^ ..^r..^.£U.0^^200 3T1^$T<l5TR<li<n PCTSn^ST^TW /. \f 31T^$T q3R? (^cli^d^) 59 ?^ITWr^rf§?T3ff^$T beto. Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Sliri Aruu Sao, Dy, respondent Nos^l.,2 & 4 on HeeTd,' Leanied ..counsel fo: petitioner appoiiited a^ He got Doctorate degree iii| P.S.C. m tiie year 1990. juniors to tlie petitio-ner authorities, but fh.e petition| case for proiiiotion is not For the present, leaiTi| tliis petitioii .Biay be dispo; file. a detailed representati^ the coiicerued autliority represeiitatiorA within the stj This Imiited prayer| petitioner is not. opposed by| Tlie .prayer is aUo¥7ed. It is directed that tf| detajled representation'aloi-i| .Writ Petitioii'before the coi we.eks froni todav and ifl .concenie.cl aiith.os'ity shaU d|: €pi<<Io<i1ri+ii^^V^"fe^9 <<FJI^I'< ^grf^lH3n^?T jleaj.iied counsel for fhe petitioner. Govt. Advocate, who appears for jdvaiice cop;vT. tlie petitioner subaiits . fhat the A.ssista.it Professor on 22/12/1986. tlie year 1993 'aiid was confirsiied io. L-e.am.ed counsel furtlier submits that |have been promoted by tlie State ?r has iiot been promoted, as' su.ch, his ig considered. ^.d counsel for the petitioner prays that ^d ofwitli .a libert}/''to the petitioner to u before the conceniecl authority aad |nay be directed to dispose . of' liis pe.riod grauted by tliis Court. .made by leanied couiisel for flie lleanied coiinsel for tlie State. so advised/ tlie petitioner m.ay ffle a ^ivith. a cop;/ of this order and a copy of icenied aiifhorily withio. a period of 4 such a representatiou is .fi].ed, tl.ie Ispose of'the SEmie as early .as possible sUpulatecl J?L SP/FS/2005-20,000 XI-HC-78 *IM«Im<n^ v3x'T|<^<i^ic)<4, tp-alwKo, Iqirtw^ ^f H^^ IQ^ 60 3H^?T q^q? (^c|i^6|<g) ^200 3H^$T<PTf^nq? WTTW^^T^^Jch u - 'c //^. ^v / B^^TTST?^rfiPT 3H^$T preferably witliio. a period of 8 of tlie. aforesaid representation With fhe above fiiiaU.y disposed of at fhis Qta.ge.. Conseqnentiy, M(W)P No ...staiids disposed. of. observat|oiis/ directious, <P|^Io<fly1 ^MoT^fel<l >cfvt^l^< ^3rf^T3ff^^T ^eeks from -the date of filmg/. receipt l^y hisii, s, this petitio'n staiids 3845/2005 aiid lANo.8476/2005 Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge /^ ^ ^ ^y^^ ^-