am§§b§199 m6 9.9.1. , \ Turendra Kumar 3/0 Pheol Szngh 1. » Deshmukhw ageé about 31 years, 3/0 Vlllage, Daniya.g 90st Sikosa rah. ’ Qunaeraehiw mstt.’ mrg'M.P;' " «v PETITIONER Versus : 3 1. The Prescribea Authority. ( sub~D:.visn.onal afficer) w Gunaerdehi .Tah.Gundardehi, (Burg I I Distt.) M.P. .. 7 \ " “V kk 2. Nirbhay 3/6 Ganesh Ram sahu, _ k R/o Village Jnnwan1. Tahsll : Gundardehi Distt. mrg M.P. \ ' h 3. Gandlal .S/G Mannulal $aha, R/e Village Junwiani, Tahsil " \ Gaxiaaraehi Distt.‘l\mrg‘M.P; ’ i 5 4; Diskict‘me'ctiofn a‘f:iceri;30 Duré M.P.’ ETEIOH'UNEER ARTLE 226 6: 227 OF TEE CONSTITUTIQN O_ - ‘ ‘ mam z ~ F IC F HBH ¢QUEI OF QHHAHEQARHAI BILA§PUR SINGLE BENCH : HON’gLE MR. SKTISH g AG§IHOTRII J. WRIT PE l ”ION NO.2505 OF 1996 Present : None appears for the petitioner. None appears for the respondents. ORDER (Passed .on 13 of November, 2006) When the matter was sailed for hearing twice, on both the occasions, none appeared nor any representation was made on behalf of the petitioner. 2. In the circumstance, the writ petition is oismiesed for non- prosecution. No order as to costs. ‘ Sdl- _ _ ’ Satish K. Agmhotn Ju¢9€ /_./ Gopai Petitioner Turendra Kumar versus Resgondents The Prescribed Authority (Sub- Divisional Officer) Gunderdehi and others