BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Fifth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15434 of 2011 1. GOPALAKRISHNAN 2. AYYAPPAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 & 2 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NANGUNERI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.213/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. D.VENKATESH Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 427 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.213 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police. They have approached this Court for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. Heard Mr.D.Venkatesh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.K.C.Durai Pandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and they have not involved in any other case of similar nature. He would also submit that they are also having permanent residence and therefore, he would request for the grant of anticipatory bail. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the petitioners damaged the fence, worth about Rs.50,000/-. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to all the petitioners, of course, subject to certain stringent conditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 6. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the Judicial Magistrate concerned on each of them executing bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri, and on further condition that the each petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- to the credit in Crime No.213 of 2011 on the file of the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri and the learned Magistrate is directed to keep the same as Court deposit and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks. 7. The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 25/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NANGUNERI. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NANGUNERI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. D.VENKATESH Advocate SR.No.41597 SR : 29.11.2011 : 2P/6C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15434 of 2011 Date :25/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/