Cri. Apln. No. 130/2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 130 OF 2011 Shobha d/o. Pandurang Aghav ....Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ....Respondents. Mr. S.S. Jadhavar, Advocate for applicant. Mr. G.R. Ingole, APP for State/respondent. Mrs. S.S. Jadhav, Advocate for respondent No. 2. CORAM : T. V. NALAWADE, J. DATED : 22nd June, 2011. PER COURT : 1. This application is filed for cancellation of anticipatory bail, given in Criminal Application No. 4538/2010. The respondent No. 2 has appeared in the proceedings and application is opposed by him. The APP has filed report of Investigating Officer along with mobile call details. The accused/respondent No. 2 has also filed call details in respect of SIM cards of accused and complainant. 2. It is the case of the original complainant that after getting the relief of anticipatory bail, the applicant/accused called her on mobile phone on 2nd and 3rd January and gave threats of life to her. She has contended that the applicant/accused is insisting that she should Cri. Apln. No. 130/2011 2 withdraw the report given to police. The submissions show that the chargesheet is already filed. 3. It is not disputed that the number of SIM card of accused is 9421348621 and the number of SIM card of the complainant is 9921909943. The call details produced by the State show that there were calls from the accused to the complainant on 1st January 2011, 2nd January 2011 and also on subsequent dates till 9th January 2011. On the alleged dates on 2nd and 3rd January there were four calls made by the accused to the complainant. On the other hand, call details produced for the accused show that on 28.12.2010 the complainant had made eleven calls to the accused. The duration of one call was 786 seconds and shortest duration was 30 seconds of one call. Calls were made by the complainant on 29.12.2010 also which were of duration of more than 900 seconds (three calls). Calls were made on subsequent dates also. One call of 4.1.2011 was of duration of 1056 seconds. On 3.1.2011 the accused had made a call of duration of 1031 seconds to the complainant. 4. The complainant has made allegations that by giving false promise of marriage, the accused who is married man, kept sexual relations with her and she was deceived. After considering the material available against the accused, this Court has granted anticipatory bail to the accused. The relief granted is sought only on the aforesaid ground. It Cri. Apln. No. 130/2011 3 was submitted for APP that reports were given to police station and NC’s are also registered. In view of the aforesaid circumstances and particularly due to circumstances of making of calls by the complainant herself to the accused, this Court holds that there is no force in the ground taken in the application. So the application stands rejected. [ T. V. NALAWADE, J.] ssc/criapln130/22