IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 22790 of 2002 BETWEEN: 1 Ravi Dinesh, S/o. R. Venkata Rao, R/o. Plot No.26, H.No.3- 16B/79,Postal Colony, Kakinada - 533 003, East Godavari District. 2 Mundru Arun Kumar, S/o. M.D. Aserwadam, R/o. Plot No.26, H.No.3-16B/79, Postal Colony, Kakinada - 533 003, East Godavari District. ... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Board of Intermediate Education, Rep. by its Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings,Hyderabad. 2 The Board of Adult Education & Training, Rep. by its Secretary, Pankha Road, New Delhi - 110 056 3 The Board of Adult Education & Training, Rep. by its Regional Director, Southern Regional Officer, 4-5-403, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad. 4 The Andhra University, Rep. by its Registrar, Visakhapatnam. 5 Aditya Academy and Degree College, Rep. by its Chairman Sri. N. Sesha Reddy and Principal, Sri B.E.V.L. Naidu, Santhi Nagar, Kakinada. 6 P.V.R. Trust Degree College, Rep. by its Principal Sri T.V. Raghavendra Rao, Kakinada. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the arbitrary action of the 4th to 6th respondents in not considering the case of the petitioner's for continue their Degree course even after getting admission in the said course and not allowing the petitioner's for classes in the middle of the academic year 2002- 2003 on the ground that, they entertain some doubts regarding the equivalency of Uttar Madhyama course to that of Intermediate course for AP as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Article 14 and 21 of the constitution of India and issue a consequential direction the respondents 4th to 6th for continuance of petitioner's Degree course by treating the Uttar Madhyama course of Board of Adult Education and training as equivalent to that of Intermediate course of Board of Intermediate Education, Hyderabad and issue such other writ or order or orders as deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.P.G.PRAKASH RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORDER: The matter relates to admission into the degree course for the academic year 2002-2003. As the academic year is already over, I am of the opinion that nothing survives in the writ petition for adjudication. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J April 19, 2008 DSK