Civil Revision No. 96 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 96 of 2010 Date of Decision: January 11 , 2010 Nagpur Golden Transport Company ...... Appellant Versus Suresh Mehra and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.Anupam Bhardwaj, Advocate for the appellant. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. This petition has been filed against the order dated 19.5.2009 closing the evidence of the petitioner and subsequent order dated 18.12.2009 whereby application for recalling the order was declined. Learned counsel states that on 19.5.2009 the petitioner was duly present in the Court before lunch and had submitted his examination- in-chief by way of affidavit. After lunch when he appeared it transpired that the evidence had been closed by order. Further states that the petitioner has to lead no other evidence except offer the witness for cross-examination. In my opinion it would be in the interest of justice if one opportunity is granted to the petitioner to lead his entire evidence(in the Civil Revision No. 96 of 2010 2 shape of offering the person whose affidavit had already been filed for cross-examination). Consequently this petition is allowed in above terms. Since the main case has been decided, the pending Civil Misc. Applications, if any, stand disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE January 11, 2010 sunita