1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6823 OF 2011. Tanaji Govind Patil & Ors. ....Petitioners. Versus Rama Nana patil and others ...Respondents. Mr Prashant J. Bhavake, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr R.M. Patne, Assistant Government Pleader for the Respondents. CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATED :5th September, 2011. P.C.:- The main grievance of the petitioners in the writ petition is that respondent No.4 has not decided their application for stay filed in an appeal No.222/2011. By an order dated 20th August, 2011, respondent No.4 was directed to dispose of the said stay application expeditiously. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that respondent No.4 has rejected the stay application and, therefore, he has preferred revision application before the Additional Collector. In the circumstances, writ 2 petition has become infructuous and same is disposed of as such. However, in the interest of justice, the interim arrangement made under order dated 20th August, 2011 shall continue for a period of two weeks from today in order to enable the petitioners to take appropriate order from the Competent Authority. With these observations writ petition is disposed of. (RANJIT MORE, J.)