IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7729 of 2011 1. RAJ KISHOR BHAGAT SON OF LATE RAMNANDAN BHAGAT @ KHAKHANU BHAGAT. 2. RAJESHWAR BHAKTA, SON OF LATE RAMNANDAN BHAGAT @ KHAKHANU BHAGAT. 3. BHOLA BHAGAT SON OF LATE RAMBACHAN BHAGAT. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.7755 of 2011 1. KISHUN SINGH SON OF RAM CHANDRA SINGH. 2. SATASHU BHAGAT @ SATAHU BHAGAT @ OPINDAR SON OF LATE RAM BACHAN BHAGAT. 3. MOHAN BHAGAT SON OF DEO SARAN BHAGAT. 4. AMPI DEVI WIFE OF LATE RAM BACHAN BHAGAT. 5. CHAMPI DEVI WIFE OF LATE RAM BACHAN BHAGAT. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 01.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 323, 447 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Prevention of witch Practices Act. It is alleged against the petitioners to have entered into the house of the informant and called the informant a witch. It is specifically alleged against the Raj Kishore Bhagat to have made assault. The allegation of 2 theft is against Champi Devi. It does not appear that any injury was caused to the informant’s side. It appears that the petitioners and informant are on litigating terms and 107 Cr.P.C., proceeding was initiated at the behest of the petitioner. Considering the litigated relationship between the parties from before, the accusation does not inspire confidence, let the above named petitioners, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali in connection with Complaint Case No. 3580/2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)