IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 83 of 2009 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 29/10/2008 in WP NO : 20557 OF 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Ch.Purushotham Rao S/o.Kondal Rao Kodurupaka Village, Boinapalli Mandal, Karimnagar District. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sircilla Revenue Division, Karimnagar District. 2 The Tahsildar, Boinapalli Mandal, Karimnagar District. 3 The Joint Collector, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: MR.A.PRABHAKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Division Bench of this Court made the following : (Judgment follows 2nd page) THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO. 8 3 OF 2009 J U D G M E N T : ( Per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) This writ appeal is filed against the order dated 29-10-2008 in WP.No.20557 of 2008 passed by the learned single Judge, whereby she disposed of the writ petition with a direction to the third respondent to consider the statutory appeal pending on his file taking into consideration the contentions raised by the petitioner therein and pass appropriate orders in accordance with as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. Aggrieved thereby, the present writ appeal is filed. 2. When the matter came up for admission, the learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the third respondent – Joint Collector, Karimnagar, passed orders under Clause 20 (1) (i) of the APS (PDS) Control Order, 2001 dated 29-1-2009 in Proceedings No.G4/987/2008 whereby the third respondent – Joint Collector confirmed the orders passed by the first respondent – Revenue Divisional Officer, Sircilla, Karimnagar district. Therefore, in view of the orders passed by the third respondent, the present writ appeal has become infructuous. 3. Recording the above submission and in view of the orders passed by the third respondent – Joint Collector, Karimnagar, the writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous, giving liberty to the appellant to question the same before the appropriate authorities, if he is aggrieved by the said orders. 4. In the result, the writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ________________________ JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI . ______________________________ JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY. 10/2/2009. I s L NB: Furnish CC in two days. B/ o. IsL ........REGISTRAR To 1. 2.2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WA {KURR}