IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3036 OF 2005 IN JUDGE’S ORDER NO.102 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO.1957 OF 1993 Pushpakunj Ci-op.Hsg.Society Ltd and Ors. ..Plaintiffs Vs. Navketan Builders P.Ltd. ..Defendants And Asha Satish Parekh & Anr. ..Applicants Mr.Uday Negi i/b ALMY Legal for the plaintiffs Mr.Jayesh Bhatt for the defendants CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J DATED : 17TH OCTOBER, 2005 DATED : 17TH OCTOBER, 2005 DATED : 17TH OCTOBER, 2005 P.C.: . By consent of the parties, motion is taken on board and called out. . Motion is for setting aside the order dt.19.9.05 dismissing the Judge’s Order and restoring the same to file. An explanation given in support of motion is that the name of advocate was not mentioned on the board. In that view of the matter, Matter was not noticed by the clerk of Advocate. I am of the opinion that sufficient cause is made out. However, restoration cannot be without payment of cost. Applicants are directed to pay cost quantified at Rs.2500 to the Maharasthra State Legal Services Authority. On payment of cost, motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Judges Order to be placed on board before the learned single Judge taking Judges Order on Monday, 24.10.05.