1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R D.B. Civil Writ Petition (Parole) No.8858 of 2009. Munim Meena son of Shri Pheli Ram Meena. VERSUS State of Rajasthan and Others Date of Order :::: 27/08/2009 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh Hon'ble Mr. Justice G.S. Sarraf Mr. Shailesh Panwar, Advocate, for Mr. Nikhlesh Katara, Counsel for the Petitioner. Mrs. Rekha Madnani, Deputy Government Counsel for the State. Per Court : Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Deputy Government Counsel for the State and perused the material placed before this Court. After issuing notices, the reply to the writ petition has been submitted by the respondents. Perused the reply. In Para 7 of the reply, the respondents have submitted that after the direction of this Court the case of the petitioner was considered before the District Parole Advisory Committee in its meeting held on 23.06.2009, but certain more inquiries were made from the concerned authorities and those 2 reports are yet to be received and, therefore, his case was pending for consideration before the District Parole Advisory Committee. On the previous date, we inquired from the learned counsel for the respondents as to when the next date is likely to be fixed for the meeting. The learned counsel for the respondents has informed today that the next meeting of the committee is likely to be held in the month of September 2009. In that view of the matter, looking to the fact that the case of the petitioner is still pending, we direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in the next meeting to be held in the month of September 2009. The respondents will ensure that all relevant record and information, which was sought by the committee in its earlier meeting held on 26.06.2009 would be made available to the committee during the course of the meeting to be held in the month of September 2009 so that a final decision could be taken by the committee. The committee is directed to decide the matter in its next meeting. The petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid directions. In case, the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is free to approach this Court afresh. (G.S. Sarraf) J. (Dalip Singh) J. ashok/