IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1850 of 2009 1. BRIJ NANDAN RAJBANSHI 2. Indra Deo Rajbanshi 3. Naresh Rajbanshi Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----- 2/ 30.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. One loaded pistol from petitioner no.1, one country made pistol of 12 bore from petitioner no.2 and two cartridges from petitioner no.3 were recovered, for which all the three petitioners have been convicted for two years for the offence under Section 25(1-B) and two years under Sections 26-35 of the Arms Act with fine of Rs. 2,000/- for each of the offences. Learned counsel prefers to press the sentence only pointing out the accusation on the point of conviction that for a single act of having in possession of illegal arms, three offences are made applicable for the Arms Act. If there is any illegality on the point of conviction that is resolved by passing a single order for sentence and that is minimize to the period undergone by petitioners, as they remained in custody since 17.05.2007 the date of their arrest to 28.11.2008 and from 29.02.2009 till today in revision exonerated from fine. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released forthwith in connection with Aurangabad Town P.S. Case No. 55 of 2007 (G.R. Case No. 907 of 2007 and T.R. No. 140 of 2009) pending in the Court of J.M., Ist Class, Aurangabad. 2 With such modification, the revision application is partly allowed on the point of sentence affirming the conviction recorded by the Trial Court as well as the Appellate Court. Let the order be communicated through F.A.X. at the cost of the petitioners in connection with Aurangabad Town P.S. Case No. 55 of 2007 (G.R. No. 907 of 2007 and T.R. No. 140 of 2009) in the Court of J.M. Ist Class, Aurangabad. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)