IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.14860 of 2011 Dwarika Rajbhar son Yashoda Bhar Versus The State Of Bihar --------------- 3/ 19.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was refused bail by order dated 12.05.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No.15033 of 2010 but has renewed his prayer for bail on the ground that the witnesses, who have named the petitioner, have not supported the case of the prosecution. A report was called for from the Trial Court specifically on this point and it has reported that two witnesses did not support the case of the prosecution but four witnesses have named the petitioner during trial. It is conceded that Raja Ram Bhar, who had named the petitioner, has not been examined up till now. In view of such, I am not inclined to review the earlier order. Prayer for bail is once again rejected. The Trial Court is directed to send a list of the witnesses fixing specific dates for their examination along with a copy of this order to the Superintendent of Police, Rohtas, who is directed to ensure the attendance of the witnesses on the date fixed so that there is no further delay in the trial. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)