1 ABA-34.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.34 OF 2011 Mrs. Radha Devi w/o A. Rama Krishna Reddy .... Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra .... Respondent S/Shri Ashok Mundargi, Senior Counsel with Sagar Divekar, Vikrant Singh Negi and Ms Devangee Ganatra i/b Tri Legal for the Applicant. Shri Y.M. Nakhawa, APP, for the State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: JANUARY 18, 2011 P.C: 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail by the authorized signatory of M/s. KVR & Company of Hyderabad, who provided contract labours to a Mumbai based company known as M/s. Mumbai Waste Management Limited. An agreement was shown to have been executed on 5-7-2003 on a stamp paper issued by the Andhra Pradesh Treasury, distributed in the year 2006. A private complaint was filed by the labour union working in M/s. Mumbai Waste Management Limited. On this, an investigation has been 2 ABA-34.11 ordered and in the offence so registered the applicant apprehends her arrest. Considering the nature of the allegations made, the applicant's being present in the custody for the purpose of investigation is not at all necessary. Therefore, in the event of her arrest the applicant be released on bail in C.R. No.378 of 2007, filed before the First Class Magistrate, Panvel and investigated by the Taloja Police Station on her furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the sum aggregating to Rs.25,000/- on the condition that the applicant shall report at the police station concerned on 22-1-2011 at 10:00 a.m. for interrogation and thereafter as and when required by the I.O.. The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and she shall not leave the country without the prior permission of the trial Court. 2. This order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge-sheeted, the applicant may 3 ABA-34.11 furnish fresh bond before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court, dated 2-12-2010, delivered in Criminal Appeal No.2271 of 2010, arising out of SLP (Cri.) No. 7615 of 2009 {Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.}. 3. The application accordingly stands disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)