1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.848 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8206 OF 2007 Municipal Corporation for the City of Kalyan & Dombivali .. Petitioner/ Applicant Versus Leo Advertising & Marketing Co. .. Respondent Mr.A.S.Rao for petitioner/applicant Mr.V.A.Thorat, Senior Advocate with Mr.P.J.Thorat for respondent CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 2nd April 2008 P.C. . Heard Mr.Rao for applicant and Mr.Thorat, learned Senior Counsel for respondent. Perused the civil application and the annexures thereto. 2. In my view, the relief claimed in civil 2 application cannot be said to be restricted only to clarify certain aspects in the consent order passed in the above writ petition. The petitioner/applicant Corporation has sought substantive relief based upon subsequent developments and proceedings in the trial court. The remedy of the applicant is not to move this application but to file substantive proceedings and challenge therein the orders and subsequent developments. 3. Nothing prevents the applicant from bringing to the notice of this Court the conduct of the respondent subsequent to the order passed in the above writ petition and seek appropriate reliefs in that behalf. 4. Keeping all pleas open to be raised by both sides, this civil application is disposed of. 3 (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)