1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Civil Application (caf) No. 2431 of 2011 (In FA St. 16126/11) Surendra s/o Mahadevrao Warwatkar ...Versus... Laxman s/o Mahadevrao Warwatkar & anr. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. D.N. Dani Advocate for appellant. Mr. Mukesh Samarth Adv. for Respondents. … CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 25.11.2011. C.A. No. /11 This is an application for recording compromise. During the course of last hearing before this Court, it transpired that the parties to the appeal are real brothers and this Court made an attempt to make upon them to arrive at a compromise. Counsel for both the parties fairly co-operated and now the result is that both of them have come with an application for recording compromise. The compromise application is signed by the learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. The terms and conditions mentioned in the compromise are reasonable and there should 2 be no difficulty in accepting the same. The only point of dispute now is that the appellant wants time to vacate the suit property up to June 2012. This is stoutly opposed by Mr.Samarth, learned counsel for respondent, on the ground that the appellant has been occupying the suit premises since 2005 in a wholly unjustified manner. Registry to register the compromise application forthwith. Accepting the compromise application, on the disputed point, I make the following order. ORDER (i) C.A. No. is accepted. (ii) Compromise-decree be drawn in terms of clauses A, B, C, D, E and F of the compromise application. (iii) F.A. St.No. 16126/11 disposed of in terms of compromise pursis. (iv) Appellant to vacate the suit premises till 30.4.2012, and in no case, the time shall be extended thereafter, nor the appellant shall apply for the same. (v) Appellant to file an undertaking on affidavit to the above effect. Judge /TA/