THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.N. RAO NALLA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.361 OF 2005 JUDGMENT: This revision was admitted on 09-03-2005 and thereafter the matter came up for hearing on 03-02-2011. On 17-02-2011, as there was no representation and none appeared for the petitioner, it was directed to be listed under the caption “for dismissal.” On 24-02-2011, though there was no representation and none appeared for the petitioner in spite of the matter being listed under the caption “for dismissal”, it was adjourned to next week and on 04-03-2011, at request the matter was adjourned. However, on 10-03-2011 and 24-03-2011, as it was reported that talks are going on for settlement of the matter out of Court, it was adjourned. However, on 07-04-2011, again there was no representation for the petitioner and none appeared on his behalf, as such, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal.” Today also, in spite of the matter being listed under the caption “for dismissal”, none appeared for the petitioner and there is no representation on his behalf. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed for default. __________________ B.N. RAO NALLA, J Date:08-04-2011. PV