IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 8TH ASWINA 1933 OP(Crl.).No. 3148 of 2011(Q) -------------------------------------- MC.48/2011 of ADDL. CJM COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM ............ PETITIONER: SHAMNA, AGED 27 YEARS, NOW RESIDING AT TC.45/633, 'SUBAH', PETTA P.O., KALLUMOODU, ANAYARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.MOHAMED JAMEEL RESPONDENTS: 1. RAHMATHULLA, TC 10/1640. 'DARUSSALAM' VATTIYOORKAVU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN 695 013. 2. SOUDHABEEVI, TC 10/1640, DO. DO. 3. MUHAMMED SALI @ SALIH MOWLAVI, DO. DO. 4. O.A.RASHEED, VENPAKAL HOUSE, VATTIYOORKAVU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. AMEER MUSLIYAR, H.A. HOUSE, THUMPAYILA P.O. PALLIMUKKU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6. HAJA NASRUDEEN, FARZANA MANZIL, CHANDAMUKKU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. THIS OP (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN OPCR 3148/2011 EXT. P1 TRUE COPY OF THE MC.48/2011 OF ADDL. CJM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM EXT. P2 TRUE COPY OF THE CMP 1285/2011 OF ADDL. CJM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM EXT. P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE WOMAN PROTECTION OFFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM IN MC.48/2011 OF ADDL. CJM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM /TRUE COPY/ N.K.Balakrishnan, J. ------------------------------------------- O.P.(Crl.)No.3148 of 2011 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of September, 2011 ORDER Petitioner herein is the petitioner in M.C.No.48/2011 stated to be pending before Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvananthapuram. That petition was filed under various provisions of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, that petition was filed on 02.04.2011 and that though C.M.P.No.1285/2011, shown as Exhibit P2, was filed claiming interim maintenance and also for an order restraining the respondents therein from entering into the shared house, no order has been passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate till this date. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the nature of the urgency of the request made therein, learned Chief Judicial Magistrate may be directed to pass orders on the application expeditiously. 3. Since the limited prayer is only for an expeditious disposal of that application, I find no necessity to issue notice to the respondents herein. OPCR 3148/2011 2 4. In the circumstances, learned Chief Judicial Magistrate will dispose of C.M.P. No.1285/2011 at the earliest after hearing both sides. If the petition now stands posted to a far off date, learned Chief Judicial Magistrate can prepone that petition after giving notice to the parties concerned and then decide the matter in accordance with law. This petition is disposed of as stated above. (N.K.Balakrishnan, Judge) tkv The words “Chief Judicial Magistrate” occurring in the last line of paragraph 1, 2nd and 3rd lines of paragraph 2 and 1st and 4th lines of paragraph 4 in the order dated 30.09.2011 in OP(Crl.) No.3148/2011 are corrected and substituted as “Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate” vide order dated 09.11.2011 in OP(Crl.) No.3148/2011. Sd/-Registrar (Judicial)