IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1935 of 2006 PRIYADARSHI KUMAR Versus SNIGDHA @ MAMTA & ANR ----------- 2 11.08.2008 No one appears for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court, order impugned with regard to the source of income of the petitioner and thereby fixing a sum of Rs. 1500/- per month by way of ad interim maintenance both for the wife and the minor daughter cannot be said to be either illegal or excessive. In that view of the matter, this Court does not find any merit in this Civil Revision application and the same is dismissed with a direction to the Court below to ensure that the arrears and current amount of maintenance as mentioned in impugned order be realized within one month. BCJ (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)