wp6742.09 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6742 OF 2009 Taterao S/o Apparao Deshmukh, R/o- "Manjula Sadan", House No.135-B, Swatantraya Sainik Colony, Shobhangar Road, Nanded, Taluka and District-Nanded. ...PETITIONER. VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra, Through the Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-400 032 and others. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri.V.G. Sakolkar Advocate for Petitioner. Shri. S.K. Kadam, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. to 4. Shri. S.V. Warad Advocate for Respondent No.5. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE : 7TH JANUARY, 2011. wp6742.09 2 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The counsel for the management submits that the pension papers of the Petitioner are already forwarded. The Petitioner was dismissed from services. The Petitioner approached the School Tribunal. The Appeal filed by the Petitioner was allowed by the School Tribunal. Against the said Judgment and Order passed by the Tribunal, the Management filed Writ Petition No. 7460 of 2007. By an order dated 29th April, 2008 the Writ Petition was admitted. By an order dated 21st July, 2009 the learned Single Judge of this Court (CORAM:R.M. BORDE, J.) stayed the direction contained in Para No.3 of the impugned order directing the Respondent Management to reinstate the Petitioner as Incharge Headmaster. 3. In the light of the submissions advanced, wp6742.09 3 we observe that the Education Officer (Secondary) to whom the pension proposal was forwarded by the Management, shall pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. The Education Officer (Secondary) shall notice the contesting parties before passing orders on the pension proposal. All the issues which are subject matter of the Writ Petition, are not affected by the disposal of this Petition. 4. With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. [S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] asb/JAN11/wp6742.09