Jag/wt: K3 @ cx [WW ‘ C w QQ PETITIONER RESPONDENTS AT BILASPUR \—\ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH w. P. No. @373 [2005 \“«7\l\$'r , ”73$: 3' ‘m Lam ‘ W .»,,.,_ Collector of Surguja, Ambikapur Dist : Surguja (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner Tribal Development, Ambikapur Dist : Surguja (C.G‘) The Principal Higher Secondary School, Gopalpur (Rajpur), Dist : Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226(227 OF THE M CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT N OR DIRECTION TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER 7 \,.v ‘ / : Dubey Prasad S/o Ronha, aged about 40 years, occupation— Assistant Teacher Government Higher Secondary School, Gopalpur, R/o Village Patratu, Post Karra (Rajpur), Dist : Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS / : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary, Ministry of Tribal, S.C. S.T Development Department, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). Commissioner Tribal and S.C. Welfare _ Department, Raipur (C.G.) Chief Executive Officer District Panchayat Ambikapur, Surguja (C.G.) XI—HC—78 HW,WHTR5, W m .w.¢€§.(&*.9;..%i7.€>?.2~”§7 mi 200 WW<W> WWW WWEWW matalhm . %3T%tr3n%¥1 17.03.2005 Shri Bhupendra Singh, cnunsel for the petitioner. Shri' Akhil Agrawal, Panel Lavwer for the State/raspondents. Heard on admission. Learned counsei for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, was working as an Assistant Teacher in High School, Gopaipur, Rajpur (CGA) has been traiisfen‘ed to Primaiy Sehoo], Dotam, Block— ‘ Ramchandrapun District- Saurg'uja (C.G.) Vide order dated 3 1.7.2004 (Annexure-Pfl). He submits tint though there is an endorsement in the order of transfer that the same is on the own request but the petitioner has not made any such request to the department. He further submits‘that he could come to know about the order of transfer on 2.11.20047'vwhereas the impugned order has been passed 0n 31.7.2004. He also submits that the petitioner has been relieved ‘from his institution on 10.2.2005. .He further submits that the petitioner has filed a representrtion on 3.11.2004 but the same has I not been decided so far. ' Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that for the present, the petition may be disposed of with a direction to the authority concerned to decide the representation Within-the stipulated period prescribed by this Court. The prayer is allowed. The representation filed by the petitioner on 3.1 1.2004, if not disposed of so farfthe same shall be disposed of as early as possible W XI—HC—78 a§g$ ¥W mna&m§ $ 6 weeks frem the date bf filing pf prefsrably Within a period 0f certifiedeopy of this order before the concerned authority. The a reasoned order on the grievances arly by assigning the reason for the to be on the request of the petitioner etitioner‘is that he has not made any concerned authority shall pass raised by the petitioner particu} Transfer, which has been showil whersa‘s the contention ofthe p such request to the department. With the aforesaid obs: disposed of. w, iCertified copy as per ruie . Nations: the petition stands finally .whzuf’; Sdl- ’ SU'NIL KUMAR SINHA i Judge ‘2 .n /