THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P.Nos.3069, 3070 and 3076 of 2009 COMMON ORDER: The grievance of the petitioners in these revisions is common. They filed suits in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Rajampet, against the respective respondents, for recovery of certain amounts. They filed applications under Rule 109(2) of the Civil Rules of Practice, with a prayer to advance the suit to a particular date for reporting that they do not press the suits. The trial Court returned the application vide endorsements, dated 15.06.2009, to the effect that the bundles have been sent to the District Court in an enquiry. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that though specific proceedings are prosecuting in relation to the suits, there should not be any difficulty in acceding to the request made by them. This Court called for a report from the learned Senior Civil Judge, Rajampet, and the report has since been submitted. A perusal of the same discloses that though the suits filed by the petitioners along with other suits were called for by the District Court, they have since been returned. The object of the petitioners in filing the applications only to report that they do not intend to press the suits. The trial Court felt that the request of the petitioners could not be acceded to, in view of the pending enquiry. The record, however, discloses that no such enquiry is pending and the facts have since been related to the concerned Court. Hence, all the revisions are disposed of, directing that the learned Senior Civil Judge, Rajampet, shall advance the suits to a date convenient to the petitioners and take necessary steps depending upon the nature of the representation to be made by the petitioners. It is directed that any request for dismissal of the suit or the one not pressing them shall be in writing and no oral representation shall be accepted. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J Date: 03.08.2009 sj