IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5507 of 2011 1. Bhola Bhagat 2. Ashok Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 4 29.06.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 42 of 2010 registered under Sections 363 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of learned Sub- divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahana at Motihari. The accusation against the petitioners is to have got the victim Soni Kumari forcibly married with Ranjeet Kumar. 164 Cr.P.C. statement of the victim girl corroborates the accusation, but she agrees that she is residing with Ranjeet Kumar in Delhi and out of wedlock, there is a child. It appears that Santosh Kumar has been granted bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 28024 of 2010. I see no reasons for the learned court below 2 not to give the same privilege to the petitioners if the petitioners surrender within a period of four weeks. With the above observation, this application is, accordingly, disposed off. Let the order be transmitted to the learned court below through fax at the cost of the petitioner. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)