W. P. CS) NG.64? of2007 Pstiticaie^ Shankar Lat RatlwFe, son of iate tlil Sai, aged.aboitf ^ y^ eoFisiab!® No. 184, Police yne, JanigirChampa^C.G^ 'V®fsi».?,:.^/;.;:'7'''':r'.', •'.':'1'^^^^ ••' ,:;'., ;' Responderrts 1. State of ChhatSsgarti, through- The Secfeta(y, Home and Police AffaffStR^pur^.G^ Th®Qirector Genera! of Po!ic8, RdiceWtadquartei'.Raipur^.G^ Tfis Inspector Gensral of Pofjce, BiiasRur^angai, Bilaspyr^ejS.) The Supenntendent of PoUce, .Janjgjr<^)ampa(e.G.} 2. 3. WRITPETITI©rilUNDE%ART!GI.E22SOFTHE SB: Hon'bte Mr. Jysiice SaSsft K. ^jniftetei ^Shri'M.iK.B&aduri, Advocate forifte petifioner. Shri Sushjl£3ubey,Govt. Adwcate for the respondents. ORDER ^Passed unUus3tfftdayofApn{,2007) 1. Leamed counset apRearing for the petiGoner submite that We petitioner has been workingas Constabte aod has compteteet 24 yearsregularservice.ThepetifionerisentfttedtpseeotKttimetound promoUontouthehc^TK*beengrantedth&sams,whiGhiscon{raiy totheprovi^ns<rf^ RS), ^ April, 2QQQ ^jnnwuto P/6^, 1SP Apnt, 20)0 ^rmwure P/7) arri2^ (^,2002 (ftnnexure^^ 2. Leamed counsel fbr ^ responder^ does not dtspute^^^^^ afcrestatedsubmjssionmactebylearTiedcoynselforthepefitioneF. ^'€• Thakur 3. Havina heard leamed wunsel for the parfies and having perused theafGresaiddocuments.ftepetifioHisatlowedandtheeoneemed authorjty/respondent No. 3 is directed to considerthecase of ffie pejffioner, in aecordance ysrittt theabovs stated circulars. for grant of seeondtimeboundpremotion.Noorderastoeoste. ,.:Sd/-^ •Satigfe^g Judge? -£'