1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2010 OF 2010 (Sau. Nirmala Sanjay Maske vs. The State and others) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND F.M. REIS, JJ. DATED : APRIL 28 2010 Heard Shri Mirza, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mrs. Khade, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent no.1. The grievance of the petitioner is in respect of appointment of the respondent no.4 as Anganwadi Sevika made by the competent Authority. Shri Mirza, learned Counsel for the petitioner, states that respondent no.4 is not resident of the concerned Ward and, therefore, her appointment is bad in law. Be that as it may, it will be appropriate 2 for the petitioner to make a representation to the respondent Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad in this regard within a period of two weeks. If such representation is made by the petitioner, we direct the respondent Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad to decide the same in accordance with law and procedure applicable in this regard within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of such representation. With these observations and direction, the petition is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE khj