1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.06.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN W.P.(MD)No.6319 of 2011 K.Thavasilingam : Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Director General of Police, Chennai-4. 3.The Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, 807, Second Floor, Anna Salai, Chennai-2, represented by its Chairman. : Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to constitute a Medical Board for re-medical examination of the petitioner and consequentially, to issue an order afresh in the light of the fresh medical opinion about his physical fitness with all consequential benefits both service and monetary within a period fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Kannan For Respondents : Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen Additional Government Pleader ORDER Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. The petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition for a Mandamus, directing the respondents to constitute a Medical Board for re-medical examination of the petitioner and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 consequentially, to issue an order afresh, in the light of the fresh medical opinion about his physical fitness with all consequential benefits both service and monetary, within a time fixed by this Court. 4. The case of the petitioner is that he has applied for the post of Sub Inspector of Police. He satisfied all the conditions. He has been permitted to sit for the written examination and came out successfully. He was called for physical measurement test and physical efficiency test. However, in the selection list, his name was not found place. He has been informed that he is having a colour vision defect and hence, he was not selected. 5. The respondents ought to have sent him before the Medical Board to find out really the petitioner is suffering from colour vision. Therefore, the petitioner made a request to the respondents to constitute a Medical Board for re-examining him pertaining to the eye problem. Since the same has not been done, he has come up with the present Writ Petition for the reliefs stated earlier. 6. Considering the limited scope of the matter, without expressing any opinion on the claim made by the petitioner, I direct the third respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner, as put forth by him in his representation dated 13.05.2011 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. The Writ Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (Accounts) /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Director General of Police, Chennai-4. 3.The Chairman, The Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, 807, Second Floor, Anna Salai, Chennai-2. +1 CC to Special Government Pleader (SR.No.19235) Order made in W.P.(MD)No.6319 of 2011 Dated: 17.06.2011 SML NSV/29.6.11/2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/