IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11557 of 2010 PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, SON OF LATE HARENDRA NATH MISHRA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-BAGAURA WEST TOLA, P.S. DARAUNDA, DISTRICT-SIWAN. …………………………………………………..PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………………OPPOSITE PARTY. ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar Pandey, Advocate. For the State : Mr. R.P.S. Singh, A.P.P. -------- 2. 30.4.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code besides Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the alleged recovered articles were kept at the shop of the petitioner by the licensed dealer, namely, Ganesh Prasad and Ramdarash Singh as due to the snag in the vehicle, they had to remove the articles at the shop of the petitioner. It has also been submitted that the ingredients of Section 7 of the E.C. Act are not made out in this case. The petitioner is stated to be in custody since 7.1.2010. - 2 - Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Pramod Kumar Mishra, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Siwan, in connection with Daraunda P.S. Case No.6/2010, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be the close relative or his family member, who will file affidavit before the court below giving full genealogy showing his or her relationship with the petitioner. Further, after his release in this case, if the petitioner is again found to be involved in case of similar nature, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Further, the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial in the court below. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of the trial without any reasonable cause being shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)