IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1950 OF 2009 (MS) Vijai Kuma Agrawal ………Petitioner. Versus Vijaya Bank, Haridwar and another. ……Respondents. Mr. Narendra Bali, Advocate for petitioner. 19th November, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Heard Mr. Narendra Bali, Advocate for the petitioner. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner against the proceedings initiated by the Vijaya Bank, Haridwar / respondent no. 1 under Section 13 (4) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (from hereinafter referred to as the Act, 2002). The petitioner, in fact, has a remedy to file an appeal before the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 of the Act, 2002. Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy to file an appeal before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, the writ petition is dismissed in limine on the ground of alternative remedy. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 19.11.2009 Rathour