IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40749 of 2008 ALIMUDDIN @ GULWA @ BULO @ GULLEA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 8.12.2008 Heard Mr. Pramod Kr. Mallick, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. The allegation is that the petitioner was running a gang of criminals and was not allowing the informant to plough his field simply because the informant was not ready to pay money for getting such permission. The petitioner bears a long criminal history of being accused in cases of dacoity, attempted to dacoity or having prepared himself with others to commit such offence. The allegation, which is made in the written report, is that the petitioner running a gang gets support from the very fact that he is already accused in a huge number cases of dacoity and other offences. Considering the materials in the case diary and the antecedent of the petitioner in the light of the allegations, I am not inclined to direct release of the petitioner on bail. The petition is dismissed. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )