Civil Revision No. 5812 of 2011 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 5812 of 2011 Date of Decision: 22.9.2011 Surajmal ... Petitioner Versus Pirthi Singh and Others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Shilak Ram Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner/defendant submits that he is not aggrieved by the appointment of the Local Commissioner. However, it is submitted that except Sadar Kanungo, some other revenue official be appointed as a Local Commissioner as in the earlier suit, the said revenue official has not acted fairly. It is further submitted that till today Sadar Kanungo, who was appointed as a Local Commissioner, has undertaken no proceedings. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the view that in case, the petitioner files an application within one week from today raising objections regarding the appointment of Sadar Kanungo as a Local Commissioner, the same shall be decided by the trial Court within a period of 15 days thereafter. Civil Revision No. 5812 of 2011 2 With the observations made above, the present revision petition is disposed of. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge September 22, 2011 “DK”