2 CRA-474-09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 474 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 319 OF 2010 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLN. NO.474 OF 2009 Shri Sharad Sarjerao More ... Petitioner (Og.accused) Vs. State of Maharastra & Anr. ... Respondents (No.2 orig.complt.) CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 319 OF 2010 Shri Shivaji Tukaram Borate ... Petitioner Vs. Sharad Sarjerao More & Anr. ... Respondents Mr. Prataprao J.Shinde, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. M.H.Mhatre, APP, for the Respondent No.1 State. Shri Milind Deshmukh, Advocate, for respondent No.2. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 8th July, 2010. P.C. 1. Revision Application No. 474 of 2009 is filed by the original accused against his conviction and sentence for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, while Criminal Revision Application No.319 of 2010 is filed by the original complainant for enhancement of sentence. The 2 CRA-474-09 parties are present with their Counsel. They have filed consent terms marked "X" for identification and seek to compound the case. The parties admit the contents of the consent terms. As the complainant has received total amount of Rs.60,000/- including amount of Rs.20,000/- already deposited in the Court and Rs.40,000/- by a D.D. dated 28.6.2010, the case is allowed to be compounded. The accused has also deposited Rs.3,000/- towards fine before the trial Court. The complainant is allowed to withdraw that amount towards compensation. 2. In the result, the impugned order of conviction and sentence under Section 138 in Criminal Case No.241 of 2004 passed by the J.M.F.C. Medha, is hereby set aside. The accused is acquitted. Both the Reviion Applications stand disposed of accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)