IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16458 of 2009 RAM PRAKASH PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 18.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is father-in-law has been made accused for complainant’s differences with her husband, who initially has been alleged for demand as just after first coming to petitioner’s house after marriage and she left for her maika after four days. It is alleged that during the period of two years, husband was going there and making demand also. Thereafter, all the family members, including the petitioner have been involved but taking that into consideration petitioner’s arrest at the moment can never be justified. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 471 of 2007/T.R. No. 2019 of 2008, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri R.K. Singh, J.M., Ist Class, Rosera, Samastipur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)