IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.13235 of 2008 Date of Decision: July 27, 2009 Ranjit Kaur .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & Others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondents. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) In this civil writ petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, essentially the prayer made is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment as Educational Services Provider in English after scrutiny of his original documents/ certificates. Learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions from Swaran Singh, District Education Officer (Secondary), District Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar (Nawanshahar), Punjab, states that the CWP No.13235 of 2008 [2] petitioner would be at liberty to appear before the said authority for scrutiny of his original documents/ certificates on 3.8.2009 during working hours. In case the petitioner appears on the said date, the documents/ certificates would be scrutinised and his case shall be considered. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he is satisfied and in view of the statement given on behalf of the respondents, no cause of action survives. He further states that the petitioner would appear before the authority on 3.8.2009 as required with his original documents. In case, the petitioner appears as agreed by him, the documents/ certificates would be scrutinised and his case would be considered for appointment before 24.8.2009. In view of the above, the petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. (AJAI LAMBA) July 27, 2009 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?