1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4423/2009 Labh Chand & Ors Vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order: 28.4.2010 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. BN Kalla, for the petitioners. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioners' contention is that they purchased the land in question for a consideration of Rs.50,000/- from one person Yusuf and the respondent Municipal Board, Nagaur issued notice to the petitioners (Annex.8) dated 28.2.2009 treating the petitioners to be persons who have encroached upon the land. The petitioners submitted reply to the said show cause notice. The petitioners' contention is that petitioners are in possession of the property after purchase of the said property. According to learned counsel for the petitioners the respondents' contention is that there is complaint against the petitioners that they have encroached upon the land, but the respondents did not disclose who has complained against the petitioners. From the facts referred above itself it is clear that the petitioners' contention that they purchased the property from Yusuf, but admittedly, he was not owner of the property. The property in question is said to be purchased for a consideration of Rs.50,000/-, but by no registered sale deed and thereby the 2 petitioners have not title vesting in them. It is not necessary for the Municipal Board to disclose who has complained against the petitioners. Be that as it may be, the petitioners are under legal obligation to satisfy that they are having some legal right in the land in dispute without which they have o right to invoke the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. In view of the above, there is no merit in this writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed. [PRAKASH TATIA],J. cpgoyal/-