IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-21134 of 2009 Date of decision:29.10.2009. Kabal Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Ms. G.K.Mann, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. B.B.S.Teji, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. K.S.Sandhu, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. The parties to the impugned prosecution i.e. petitioners and respondent No.2 have compounded the offences and have placed on record documented compromise, which may be read as Annexure P-2. Petitioners and respondent No.2 are present in the Court and are identified by their respective counsel. They own up the compounding. They further state that presently there is no dispute subsisting between them. Their joint statement has also been recorded separately. In the larger interest of the society and to enable the parties to maintain cordial relations, the petition shall stand allowed and FIR No.133 dated 18.06.2009, under Sections 307, 160, 506, 148, 149 IPC and 25, 27, 54, 59 of the Arms Act, Police Station B Division Amritsar (Annexure P-1) shall stand quashed qua the petitioner on account of compounding. Disposed of accordingly. October 29, 2009 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE