1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1338 /2010 (Jayant s/o. Govindrao Shelot .vs. State) .................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr. R.K.Tiwari, Adv. for the applicant. Mr. C.N.Adgokar, APP for the respondent. CORAM : A.P. BHANGALE, J. DATED : 26th August, 2010. Heard. The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.81 of 2010 registered by Police Station, Ajni, u/ss. 221, 222 and 384 of the Indian Penal Code. It appears that earlier the applicant had approached the learned Additional Sessions Court, Nagpur, who, by an order dt. 5.8.2010 rejected the application bearing Misc. Criminal Application No. 1545 of 2010 for grant of bail on the ground that allegations are serious and custodial interrogation will be required. It is alleged that the present applicant had assisted the prisoner who was on parole and who committed offences while on parole and a sum of Rs25,000/- was also recovered. According to the learned A.P.P., complaint is made by the Assistant Commissioner of Police. According to the Advocate for the applicant, the 2 complaint was lodged by one Police Constable namely Rajendra Morai. However, it appears that the complaint was endorsed by the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Crime Branch, Nagpur for appropriate legal action against the Constables concerned by arresting them. Under these circumstances, since it would be necessary to interrogate the applicant in the custody and holding of Identification Parade is necessary, this is not a fit case for grant of pre- arrest bail. The applicant is at liberty to apply for regular bail after he surrenders to the custody of the learned Magistrate concerned. For all these reasons, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail. Hence, the application is rejected. JUDGE jaiswal