In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh R. F. A No. 2433 of 2000 (O&M) Gurmail Singh and others ..... Appellant vs Union Territory of Chandigarh ..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Ramesh Kumar Dhiman, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate, for Union Territory, Chandigarh. Rajesh Bindal J. The landowners have filed the present appeal seeking enhancement of compensation for the acquired land. Briefly, the facts are that the land in Village Palsora (Chandigarh) was acquired vide notification issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, on 8.7.1994, for the development of third phase of Chandigarh (Sector-56). The Land Acquisition Collector vide his award no. 494-A dated 29.3.1996 awarded compensation @ ` 3,38,100/- per acre. Aggrieved against the award, the landowners filed objections which were referred to the learned Reference Court, who keeping in view the material placed on record by the parties, determined the market value of the acquired land @ ` 5,36,000/- per acre. It is this order which is challenged before this court. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the claim made in the present appeal is squarely covered by judgment of this court in RFA No. 1095 of 2000 – Ronki vs Union Territory, Chandigarh , decided on 18.5.2009, whereby compensation payable to the landowners for the acquired land was further enhanced to ` 12,54,880/- per acre. Learned counsel for the respondent did not dispute this factual position. For the reasons recorded in Ronki's case (supra), the present appeal is disposed of in the same terms. 23.7.2010 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge