IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3899 of 2009 JYOTI KUMAR SINGH S/O SHIV NARAYAN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 04.08.2010 The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 22.8.2008 by which the Magistrate has refused to discharge the petitioner in Madhepura P.S.Case NO. 155/04. The case of the prosecution is that some persons got freed one accused Pintu Yadav from police custody during his production in court. Petitioner was not named in the First Information Report but subsequently the petitioner was named in the further statement of the informant that he was also present at the place of occurrence when Pintu Yadav fled from police custody. It was suspected that the petitioner had a hand in the escape of said Pintu Yadav. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that apart from speculation against the petitioner there is no cogent material against him and he is only suspected to be involved in this occurrence. However, I am not impressed with the arguments since it is well known principle of law that even if a person is suspected of having committed a crime he can be required to stand trial. In view of such, this application is dismissed. Fahad. (Anjana Prakash, J)