IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C. Rev. (T) No. 34 of 2008 Decided on: 16.11.2010 State of H.P. and another …Petitioners Versus Tek Chand and another …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioners : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For the respondents : None. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. P.M. Negi, learned Deputy Advocate General fairly submits that the limitation will not survive due to the intervening developments. Consequently, the present petitioner is rendered infructuous and the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge November 16, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?