IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25117 of 2010 RAM CHANDRA SINGH SON OF LATE NANHAK SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-MATPA-TOLA-KUSHI, P.S. KUTUMBA, DISTRICT-AURANGABAD, AT PRESENT RESIDING AT MOHALLA NEW AREA, P.S. AURANGABAD (T), DISTRICT-AURANGABAD. --PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --OPP.PARTY 2 16.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. In this case, instituted against unknown, after finding an unknown dead body which was subsequently identified and earlier the widow of the deceased did not disclose name of the petitioner except one Kuldip Mehta had called on mobile phone and deceased had gone to meet him but never returned alive. Roughly after seven months widow of the deceased raised suspicion against the petitioner on the ground of earlier commission of dacoity in his house wherein deceased name also emerged. There is nothing more against the petitioner and investigation is still going on. Considering the facts and circumstances, till submission of charge sheet, the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, is directed 2 to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in Amba P.S. Case no. 32 of 2009, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date before the court below at least for two years or till hearing on the point of charge, which ever is earlier. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad