i : 1 “ g ‘ ‘ ‘2’ u ‘ 1 @ ' ) ; ; >‘ 1N THE ‘HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT T : , BILASPUR ‘ i Singia ench 1 w. P. s/No. gggq OF 2009 I T PETITIONER Y.K. Bohidar son of late D.P. Bohidar , aged about—50 years, Assistant Grade—2 in office L of Assistarlt Commissioner, Tribal 1 1 E Development, Raigrh Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). j VEREIJS t ESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarhlthrough Secretaly, \ ‘ i Tribal Welfare 8s Development i Department , D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur 3 (co) 2./Commissioner , Tribal Welfare 8L Development Department, Raipur (C.G.) z 3./Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare & i Development Department, Raigarh Distt. fRigarh (C.G.). 4. Collector, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) Kl v WRIT PE‘TITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE l CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R @é" mm N Pwbwgi 200 g) mm (Wu) mmm WW WWR $aimm $3 H$NELE Si4£1 JEST‘CE PEI?! £§§E§i DIWAKER 24.3?‘2‘3G9 Shri Manoi Kumav Sinha counsel for the metitioner. Shn' Arvina Dube§:f,‘P.L: fgx ih‘e Siam. ,Chalienge in the pressnt petition is to the order dated 30.6.2009‘ passed by raspondert N01 by which he petitioner who is Workimg as AG—H has been ti‘amsfem‘ed from the office of Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Deveio; ment Departmen , Raigarh, Diszt. Raigarh to the office of Assistant i Lommissioner, r‘ Trina} Development Department, Jashpur, District Jashpur. moomention i of counsei for the petitioner is that he is WO king as ‘Assistant Grade H and the ;eniority of the petitioner is being maintained district Wise and i‘ he wit} be conmeiieci to go on his transfer place, his seniority Wiii 3e. adversely affected. Contention of counsei fcr the State is that iet the petitioner make a representation to the respondent No. 1 and the same would be decided in accordance with law. - Counsel for the, petitioner agrees to make a representation. However Le submits that tili his ‘epresentation is decided, the r petitioner may be given some pr ateotive order. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make a representation within a neriod of ten davs from the date of receipt of the copy o‘ this order, the same would be decided Within a period of three weeks from the date of its receiot. Till ' , then the impugned crc r shall rot be given effect tot t Sd/— Pritink‘er ‘EiWaker ‘ Q Judge