IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No. 2956 of 2000 Between: 1 Sk.Anwar S/o.Sk.Suleman Govt High School , Shambunipet. 2 M.Yellaiah S/o.Veeraiah Govt High School , Palem. 3 N.JaganMohan reddy S/o.Laxminarasaiah Govt Markazhi High School hanamkonda. 4 G.Satyanarayana S/o.Veeraiah Govt High School , Masumalli 5 K.Raghuvendera Reddy S/o. Venkat Reddy Govt High School (Girls). Khazipet. 6 Ch.Yadagiri S/o.Seshaiah Govt High School Subedari 7 B.Komaraiah S/o.Laxminarasaiah 8 B.Rajanna S/o.Ramakistaiah Govt High School Shyampet 9 hafizunnisa Begum D/o.Md.Roshan Govt High School Girls Machili Bazar. 10 N.Madanmohan S/o.Ramaiah Govt High School Shiva Nagar. 11 B.Prakash S/o.Venkataiah Govt High School , Urs. 12 K.shashidar Raju S/o.ramaraju Govt High School, Urs. 13 A.Sattaiah S/o.Ramaiah Govt High School (Girls) Fort Warangal. 14 V.Ramchander Rao S/o. Raghava Rao Govt High School 15 S.Srinivasulu S/o. Ramaiah Govt High School , Shyampet. 16 M.Narsimha S/o.Narasaiah Govt High School , Shyampet. 17 A.Satyanarayana S/o.Venkataiah Govt High School , Shyampet. 18 Quamarunnisa Begum D/o.Md.Muzaffar Upper Primary School (TPT) (Urdu) , Kothur 19 Fahim Shayeda D/o. Md.Muzaffar Upper Primary School (TPT) (Urdu) , Hanamkonda. 20 shaheda Khanam D/o.Abdul Shukur Upper primary School (TPT) (Urdu) Hanamkonda. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Commissioner and Director of School Education A.P., Hyderabad. 2 The Regional Joint Director of School education Warangal. 3 The Dist Educational Officer Warangal. 4 The Chief Executive Officer Zilla Praja Parishad Warangal. 5 Democratic Teachers Federation Rep by its General Secretary G.Somaiah Gavicherla , Warangal Dist R/o. 2-7-35 , Excise Colony , Hanmakonda Warangal Dist. (R5 is impleaded as per court order In W.P.M.P 8823/00 Dt: 3- 6-02) ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned order in O.A.No.6209/99 Dt: 30-12-99 passed by the Hon'Ble A.P.Administrative Tribunal and quash the same by holding them as totally illegal and unsustainable and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 to continue the petitioners herein in their respective posts in the Govt Sector and be pleased to pass such other and further order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.S.LAKSHMA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: MR.NANDIGAM KRISHNA RAO The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No. 2956 of 2000 ORAL ORDER: (Per HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED) This Writ Petition is ﬁled seeking a Certiorari to call for the records relating to the interim Order dated 30-12-1999 passed in O.A.No.6209 of 1999 on the ﬁle of A.P. Administrative Tribunal and to quash the same. By the said Order, the Tribunal, after considering the submissions made by the learned counsel and on a perusal of the earlier Order passed by it including the Judgment of this Court in Writ Petition No.23117 of 1999, held that the matter could be adjudicated upon finally after the Government files its counter and directed to post the matter on 21-1-2000. The main grievance of the petitioners is that though this Court by an order dated 15-11-1999 passed in Writ Petition No.23117 of 1999 directed the Tribunal to consider the case of the petitioners for grant of interim orders, the Tribunal has not passed any interim orders. The Writ Petition was ﬁled in the year 2000 and at the time of admission on 23-2-2000, the respondents were directed to continue the petitioners in their respective stations in Government Sector. By now eight years have been elapsed. Since there is no adjudication on merits by the Tribunal, we are not inclined to go into the merits of the contention raised by the petitioners. Suﬃce it to direct the Tribunal to dispose of the O.A. as expeditiously as possible, after hearing all the parties, if not already disposed of. Subject to the above direction, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. _______________________ (Ghulam Mohammed,J) 24th July, 2008 _____________ (C.V.Ramulu,J) prk