-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.121 APPLICATION NO.121 APPLICATION NO.121 OF 2005 OF 2005 OF 2005 IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO.1814 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.1814 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.1814 OF 2005 Chandulal T.Parakh Pvt.Ltd. ...Applicant vs. Regional Director, E.S.I.C.,Bombay ...Respondent Mr.V.P.Vaidya for the Applicant Mr.H.V.Mehta for the Respondent CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : JANUARY 22,2008 : JANUARY 22,2008 : JANUARY 22,2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocates for the parties. An application made by the Applicant under section 75 of the Employees State Insurance Act,1948 has been rejected by the learned trial Judge thereby confirming the demand made by an order dated 25th June 1984 passed under section 45-A of the said Act of 1948. In view of the findings recorded by the trial court, no case is made out for grant of any interim relief. 2. 50% of the amount of demand under the aforesaid order has already been deposited by the Applicant with the trial court. Time of eight weeks is granted to deposit the balance amount with the Respondent. The deposit will be without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the Applicant in this Appeal. For a period of eight weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the Applicant for recovery of the said -2- balance amount. 3. The Respondent is permitted to withdraw the amount deposited by the Applicant with the trial court. The withdrawal will be subject to final outcome of the Appeal. 4. In the event, any monetary claim is made by any of the employees of the Respondent, the Respondent is at liberty to take out appropriate application for interim relief. 5. Subject to what is stated above, Application is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE