Civil Revision No.5266 of 2008 [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Civil Revision No.5266 of 2008 Decided on : March 24, 2009 Ram Chander and others ... Petitioners VERSUS Ramanand and others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Kulbhushan Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Suvineet Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 28. A.N.JINDAL, J.- Heard. Mr.Kulbhushan Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners has stated at Bar that respondents No.53 to 55 in the present petition are sought to be impleaded as defendants No.46 to 48 in order to avoid dismissal of the suit on any technicalities. However, they do not want to lead any further evidence in affirmative and they will not also request for filing any application for amendment of the plaint for raising any fresh plea on their behalf and they will urge their claim only on the basis of the evidence already on the record, except that they would be at liberty produce any evidence in rebuttal. Civil Revision No.5266 of 2008 [ 2 ] In the above view of the matter, lest the suit is dismissed for non-joinder of necessary parties, the instant petition is allowed and it is directed that the plaintiffs will not further amend the plaint, except filing the amended plaint after adding proposed defendants as parties and they shall also not lead any evidence in affirmative. Since the application for impleadment has come after a period of six years of the filing of the suit, therefore, the said addition of the parties is allowed, subject to payment of Rs.5,000/- as costs. March 24, 2009 ( A.N.JINDAL ) `gian' JUDGE