AZ^^y^. e^^"l ^\^\ •.-»»•' .,AC.°'"" \ z/ IN THE HON'BLE fflGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(O No. "^/, z-z-yzoii Atal Shrivastava, S/o Late Shri J.P. Shnvastava, aged about 41 years, R/o TUak Nagar, In front of Chhattisgarh Bhawan, BUaspur, Tahsfl and Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) FETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - Secretary, Department of Town Admmistration, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, District -E^ipur (C.G.) 2. Munidpal Corporation Bilasptu- through Coimnissioner, Munidpal Corporation, District- Baaspur (C.G). 3. Commissioner, Munidpal Corporation, District-Bilaspur (C.G). WIUT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF TIIECONSTrTUTION OFINDIA PETITIONER RESPONDENTS HIGH COURTQF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITIQN (C) N0. 7622 OF 2011 Atal Shrivastava Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Sinale Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Government Advocate for the State/respondent Nn 1 Shri A.S.Kachhawaha, Advocaie for the respondents No.2 & 3. ORDER (Passed on this 14'" day of December, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made an apDlication for renewal of his reaistration on 13.04.2009 (Annexure P-2) and thereafter, on 04.07.2009 (Annexure P-3). Till date, no decision has been taken. 2. Learned oounsei appearing for the respondent Corporation submits that if the applications of the petitioner are pending consideration, the same shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law, on its own merit. within a period offourweeks. 3. In view of foregoing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that nothing sun/ives for adjudication in this matter. 4. Accordinaly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sdl- SatishK.Agnihom Judge AshoK