IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7750 of 2010 MUNNA MISHRA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.03.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The defence of the petitioner in a Police case under Sections 302 and other provisions of the Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act also from the First Information Report and the impugned order of rejection is that there is no material to suggest that he was one of the persons apart from named accused Anup Choubey who fired causing injuries. In absence of any discussion in the impugned order of the materials during investigation identifying the petitioner as the other assailant adequately discussed, this Court is not satisfied to infringe his liberty to keep him in custody. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J., Fast Track Court III, Gopalganj in Sessions Trial No. 72 of 2009 arising out of Kateya PS Case No. 51 of 1998. Let a copy of this order be sent to the court of F.T.C. III Gopalganj which passed the order dated 30.10.2009. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)