IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND OCTOBER 2008 / 30TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 24256 of 2008(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER ------------------------- M.N.MOHANAN ALSO KNOWN AS MOHANAN NARAYANAN, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O. NARAYANAN, MITHUN VILLA, KARAKKAD P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI. K.SHAJ SRI.SAJJU.S RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, RAJKOT. 2. HINDUSTAN SALTS LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, KHARAGHODA, GUJARAT - 382 760. ADV. SRI.N.N. SUGUNAPALAN, SC, P.F. FOR R1 SMT.T.N.GIRIJA, SC,EPF ORGANISATION FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) No. 24256/2008 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE EMPLOYEE IDENTITY CARD ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT ENTERPRISE TO THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P2 : TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 15.03.2005 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE FIRST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3 : TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO. GJ/SRO/RJT/V 2547/1124/136 DATED 24.03.2005 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P4 : TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO. GJ/5354/2547/SRO/RJT/V/210 DATED 20.05.2005 WAS ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P5 : TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 08.01.2007 TO THE FIRST RESPONDENT FILED BY THE PETITIONER. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. vkm P.N. RAVINDRAN, J ----------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 24256 OF 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of October, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner was an employee of Hindustan Salts Limited, a Government of India enterprise having its registered office and business place in the State of Gujarat. The petitioner claims disbursement of pensionary benefits. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that without prejudice to the petitioner's contentions and reserving liberty with him to move the appropriate court having jurisdiction, this Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. The said submission is recorded and the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdran, reserving liberty with the petitioner to move the appropriate court seeking redressal of his grievances. The petitioner's contentions on the merits are left open. P.N. RAVINDRAN, JUDGE vkm