IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.48616 of 2008 ============================================= 1. Rajeev Ranjan Rakesh 2. Laxmi Kanti Devi 3. Kalpana Devi 4. Dr. Vijay Nandan Singh 5. Renu Devi @ Kumari Renu Rakesh 6. Gayan Ranjan .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Ambika Devi .... .... Opposite Party/s ============================================= Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sashi Chandra Pandey For the State : Mr. J.K. Singh No.1. ============================================= 3 27-09-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. It is admitted to the parties that differences were prevailing in between the parties and for the incident of the same day, Hilsa P.S. Case No. 52 of 2008 was lodged by petitioner no.2 against the complainant and her family members. Now, submission is that allegation leveled against accused persons is false and fabricated as at that time petitioner no.4 was in Bank, petitioner no.6 was at Ranchi in connection with his study and petitioner no.3 Kalpana Devi was at her school needs evidence to believe, not the proper stage to consider the same, otherwise cognizance is taken basing the allegation made in the complaint petition corroborated by witnesses. Finding no illegality, this quashing application is dismissed. Shailendra Bhushan Prasad/- (Mandhata Singh, J.)