IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36667 of 2009 1. JAI PRAKASH SAH S/O JAMUNA SAH VILL- DUMARBANAWARD NO. 19, P.S. BAIRGINIA, DISTT. SITAMARHI … PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR …. OPP. PARTY With Cr.Misc. No.40282 of 2009 1. RAMJAPI DEVI WIFE OF JAMUN SAH 2. DHARMSHEELA DEVI WIFE OF BIRENDRA SAH 3. JAMUN SAH @ JAMUN PD. SAH SON OF LATE PACHAN SAH ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – DUMARBANA WARD NO. 19, P.S. BAIRGINIA, DISTRICT – SITAMARHI. ….. PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. …. OPP. PARTY. ----------- 02/ 10.12.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioners and counsel appearing for the State. Petitioner Jai Prakash Sah (in Cr. Misc. No. 36667 of 2009) is the husband of the informant and petitioners Ramjapi Devi and Jamun Sah (in Cr. Misc. No. 40282 of 2009) are father-in-law and mother-in-law of the informant. Petitioner Dharmsheela Devi is the married sister-in-law of the informant. Specific allegation against the husband, mother-in-law and father-in-law is that they forced the informant to abort the foetus, once they came to know on the basis of ultra sound that she is carrying pregnancy and the foetus is a female child. Informant has entered appearance through her counsel and a submission has been advanced that Jai Prakash - 2 - Sah has solemnized his second marriage. Considering the allegations, I do not feel inclined to grant anticipatory bail to all these three petitioners, as such their prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is rejected. However, petitioner Dharmsheela Devi is the married sister-in-law of the informant, her prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. She is directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in case of her appearance before the Court concerned within four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Bairginia P.S. Case No. 122 of 2009 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi. DKS/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)