IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 9522 of 2008 Decided on: 14.12.2010 Ashwani Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : The only surviving dispute is with regard to the payment of salary for vacation period to the petitioner. This question is no more res-integra in view of the judgment laid down by this Court in Baldev Singh and others versus State of H.P. and others, CWP No. 415 of 2000, decided on 1st September, 2008, which has been upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent/State to grant salary to the petitioner for the vacation period. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge December 14, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No