^.- HtGH COyRT OF CKHATTISQARH: BtLASPUR Petitioner Rsspondents Bilaspur-Raipur Kshetriva Gramin Bank. Silaspur, through the Chairman. Versus 1) Seoond Additional Judge to the Court of Distrtet Judge, Biiaspur. 2) Third Civil Judge, Ciass-!!, Bilaspur. 3) Heera Ram son of'Chhatram Yadav, resident of village Rahod, Distt. Bilaspur. 4) Meghanath son of Uraso, resident of viitege Bonda (Saraipali), Dist. Raipur. (Writ Petition Articie under Article 227 oftheConstitutton ofindia) Present: Shri P.K. Bhaduri, counsel for the petitloner. llll Rsju (Passedon 4°' February, 2008) A suit for permanent injunction vras nled by respondents No. 3 and 4/plaintiiT in ihe Court of Third Civ!l Judge, Ciass II, Biiaspur against the order of retrenciiment and it was further prayed that the plaintifls be ailowed to function as they were eariier working on the post of Sweeper-cum-Watennan. An objection was raised regarding maintainabilifr/ of the suit. When an applicatiwi was moved by the petitioner under Order 7, Rule 11 of Code of Civil Prooedure inter-ata on the ground that the piaintlffs have ohallenged ttie retrenchment for whioh there is a separate forum of Labour Court and the Civii Court does not have iurisdict'ion. However, unfortunateiy their applicat'ion, aforesaid, was rejected by the Civil Jucige. Aggrieved by ths same, the petitioner filed a revision before the Seoond Additional District Judge, Bilaspur, v»tio too rejeoted his revision. Shri H.S. Patel, has not participated in the proceedings on the pretext Shat he is no more appearing in this matter. I find force in the question of law raised by the ooynsel for the petitioner that the suit before the Civil Court wherein retrenohment is under chalienge and Is not maintainable before the Civli Court. Aooordingiy, the orders passed by the Civii Judge and the Second Additionai District Judge are set aside. The petition stands allowed. ^, -==^=^ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge