THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2842 OF 2007 ORDER: The petitioner-decree holder filed this revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking to assail the order dated 02.08.2005 in E.P.No.14 of 2004 in R.S.No.196 of 1997 on the file of the XI Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, in rejecting the petition filed under Order XXI Rules 34 and 35 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to direct the judgment debtor to issue Secondary Share Certificates along with dividends and cancel 200 shares which were transferred to some one else and to issue duplicate shares as per the decree dated 03.08.1998 on the file of the Civil Judge, South (Junior Division) Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh. Having heard the learned counsel on either side and on perusal of the material available on record, it is seen that the mistake is only in regard to mentioning of the correct provision of law. It is now well established that non-mentioning of the correct provision should not lead to rejecting an application or refusal of relief as it relates to day-to-day consideration under various matters. In the circumstances, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed and the order dated 02.08.2005 in E.P.No.14 of 2004 in R.S.No.196 of 1997 is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the Court below for proceeding with the execution as laid down, on merits and in accordance with law after giving notice and opportunity to both the sides. No costs. ____________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, HACJ) 19th November 2010 RRB