IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 29TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 7TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 25921 of 2011(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER ------------------------- JITHIN.S.PADIYARA,AGED 24 YEARS, S/O SAJU.P.CHERIAN,PADIYARA HOUSE,PERISSERY(PO), CHENGANNUR,ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.THAMBAN SRI.R.REJI SMT.THARA THAMBAN SRI.B.BIPIN SMT.REVATHY P.NAIR RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------- 1. THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS,KOTTAYAM,REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 686 001. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY,PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM - 686 001 3. THE REGISTRAR,MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS,KOTTAYAM - 686 001. 4. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY,PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM - 686 001. SC SRI.T.A. SHAJI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 25921 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATIONFOR REVALUATION DT. 24-08-2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PAY-IN-SLIP DATED 24-08-2011 SHOWING REMITTANCE OF FEE FOR REVALUATION BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 28-08-1990. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE EXTRACT OF THE REVISED GUIDELINES FOR REVALUATION OF ANSWER BOOKS OF KERALA UNIVERSITY. (True copy) P.A To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).25921/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 29th day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioner applied for revaluation of the subject 'Mechanics of Machines' in the 6th semester B.Tech Supplementary Examination vide Ext.P1 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. 4.Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs