IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32932 of 2008 NATHUN BAITHA & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 11.09.2008 Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing for the complainant. Petitioner Nos. 1 and 3, Nathun Baitha and Bechna Devi are; father-in-law and mother-in-law while petitioner No. 2 namely, Prem Nath @ Banti Baitha is brother-in-law. Petitioner Nos. 4 & 5 , namely, Soni Kumari and Munna Devi are unmarried and married sisters-in-law of the daughter of the complainant. From the allegation made in the Complaint Petition, it appears that petitioner Nos. 1 and 3 did not allow the complainant’s daughter to come to her matrimonial home for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. When after three years, she was brought, within three months; she was ousted from the house. Considering the fact, prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner Nos. 1 and 3 is rejected. Petitioner Nos. 2, 4 and 5 named above are allowed anticipatory bail. In the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, they will be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount - 2 - each in connection with Complaint Case No. 966 of 2007, Tr. No. 3024 of 2007 to the satisfaction of SDJM, Sasaram, Rohtas. AKV/ (Mridula Mishra,J.)