BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Fourteenth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.12150 of 2011 1. R.SUBBIAH 2. S.MURUGAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 & 2 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE S.S.COLONY (L & O ) POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY, (CR.NO.1616 OF 2011 ) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. M.MAHARAJA Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 294(b) and 506(i) of I.P.C., in Crime No.1616 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that on the basis of the complaint given by the 1st petitioner, a case has been registered against the defacto complainant in Crime No.1615 of 2011 under Sections 341, 323, 294(b) and 506(i) of I.P.C and as a counter blast, a false case has been registered against the petitioners in Crime No.1616 of 2011. He further submitted that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital and the investigation is considerably over and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital and the investigation is considerably over and even though the petitioners were not arrested, neither they interfered with the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Madurai and on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 14/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.V, MADURAI. 2.-DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, S.S.COLONY (L & O ) POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY, 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC TO M/S. M.MAHARAJA ADVOCATE SR.NO.31286 SR : 19.09.2011 : 2p/6c ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12150 of 2011 Date :14/09/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/