1 APPA 828/11 lgc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 828 OF 2011 IN APPEAL NO.708 OF 2011 Rajesh @ Raja Nana Patil : Applicant. versus The State of Maharashtra : Respondent. Mr. Kuldeep S Patil for the Applicant. Ms. S V Gajare, APP, for the State/Respondent. CORAM : NARESH H PATIL & K U CHANDIWAL, JJ DATE : 27TH JULY 2011 P.C. 1 Heard. 2 Applicant, who is a life convict, seeks bail. 3 We have perused the earlier two orders passed by this Court which are annexed to the application. 4 Learned APP submits that there are two eye witnesses to the incident in question who deposed against the applicant. 2 APPA 828/11 5 On merit, we are not inclined to release the applicant on bail. 6 At this stage, the learned counsel for the applicant submits that the hearing of the appeal may be expedited by giving a fixed date. The learned counsel for the Applicant can make his request at a proper stage. 7 Bail Application is rejected. (K U CHANDIWAL, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.)