IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R.No.2213 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 1.4.2010 Ghaniya Lal. ....... Petitioner. Versus Ajit Kumar and others. ....... Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present: Shri Rahul Rampal, Advocate for the petitioner. .... 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? .... Mahesh Grover,J. C.M.No.8395-CII of 2010 Allowed as prayed for. C.R.No.2213 of 2010 This is a revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside orders dated 9.9.2009 and 2.12.2005 passed respectively by the Additional District Judge, Ludhiana and the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana vide which the appeal and the application filed by the plaintiff-petitioner under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 read with Section 151 of the C.P.C. was dismissed. C.R.No.2213 of 2010 (O&M) -2- .... After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the impugned orders, I do not find any ground to interfere with the discretion exercised by the Courts below by considering the fact that the petitioner is running a somewhat polluting unit in the residential area. Thus, no prima facie case was made out in favour of the petitioner. Even he had not shown that the said unit was being run by him with the permission of the State Pollution Control Board. All these facts have been taken into consideration while declining the prayer of the petitioner. Dismissed. April 01,2010 ( Mahesh Grover ) “SCM” Judge