The Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.24261 of 2006 Dated 28th June, 2010 Between: M.Sankar Narayana …Petitioner And The Superintendent, Prohibition & Excise, Kurnool and another. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Mr.K.Sitaram Counsel for respondent No.1: AGP for Prohibition & Excise Counsel for respondent No.2: Mr.A.Jagannadha Rao The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.1, in granting IL 24 license to respondent No.2, as illegal and violative of Rule 27 of the A.P.Excise (Lease of Right of Selling by Shop and Conditions of License) Rules, 2005. At the hearing, it has come out that the license issued in favour of respondent No.2 is expiring by 30-06-2010. The learned Counsel for respondent No.2 submitted that his client is not successful in getting his bid accepted for future period. Inasmuch as the license issued in favour of respondent No.2 is expiring in a short while from now, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. However, in view of the apprehension expressed by Sri K.Sitaram, learned Counsel for the petitioner, that respondent No1 may permit the successful bidder to locate the liquor shop in the premises in question, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to question such action, if any taken by respondent No.1. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.Nos.30985 of 2006 and 17817 of 2010, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 28th June, 2010 lur