IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 31ST MAY 2011 / 10TH JYAISHTA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 3906 of 2011() ----------------------------- CMP.NO.4485/2011 of J.M.F.C.- I, S. PARAVUR. .................... (CRIME NO.611/2011 OF PARAVUR POLICE STATION OF KOLLAM DISTRICT) ........ PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1,3,4 & 5: ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. UNNI @ KATTUNNI, AGED 27, S/O.JOSEPH, MOOLAVILA PADINJATTATHIL VEEDU, KURUMANDAL CHERRY, PARAVUR VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT (A1). 2. VINESH, AGED 30, S/O.VIJAYAN, KANALIL VEEDU, NADUVILAKKARA CHERRY, MAYYANADU VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT (A3). 3. ANEESH, AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.YESODHARAN, KALLUVILA VEEDU, NEDUNGOLAM, PARAVUR VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT(A4). 4. LALU, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O.SASIDHARAN, POIKAYIL THODIYIL VEEDU, NEDUNGOLAM CHERRY, PARAVUR VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT(A5). BY ADV. SRI.V.VENUGOPALAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARAVUR POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. M.R. VENUGOPALAN THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V. RAMKUMAR, J. .................................................... Bail Application No.3906 of 2011 ..................................................... Dated: 31-05-2011 ORDER Petitioner, who is the accused in Crime No. 611 of 2011 of Paravur Police Station, Kollam District for an offence punishable under Sec. 308 I.P.C. seeks his enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 8-5-2011. The petitioner was arrested on 10-5-2011. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioner, the sentiments of the near relatives of the victim and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. Sd/-V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) ani/ /true copy/ P.S. to Judge