IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No. 759 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 9.5.2011 Jaipal and ors …..Appellants vs. Chandigarh Administration and ors …..Respondents CORAM: -HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: - Shri C.L.Sharma, Advocate for the appellants HEMANT GUPTA, J Challenge in the present is to an order passed by learned Single Judge of this Court on 3.2.2011 whereby the writ petition filed by the appellants was dismissed and the request for alternative site was directed to be considered sympathetically without creating any right in favour of the appellants. Learned counsel for the appellants has argued that the appellants No. 1 and 2 are the owners of the land measuring about 10 Biswas each having purchased from Karnail Singh on 24.1.1986 whereas appellant No. 3 is the tenant on the land owned by Gurdev Singh. The other appellants are said to be in possession of the land and carrying on petty businesses. LPA No. 759 of 2011 In reply to the said petition, the State has pointed out that Karnail Singh has sold 10 Biswas of his land to appellant No. 1 and 2 in the year 1986 but the possession of the appellants is in Khasra No. 8 which is owned by the State Government and the appellants are the encroachers of the Government land. In respect of appellant No. 3, it was asserted that he is in possession of the land owned by Gurdev Singh which land has not been acquired. A perusal of the pleadings would show that the appellant No. 1 & 2 are said to be encroachers whereas the appellant No. 3 is said to be the owner of the land belonging to Gurdev Singh. Learned counsel for the appellants could not point out that any order of ejectment has been passed against appellant No. 3. In view of the said fact, we do not find any irregularity or illegality in the order passed by learned Single Judge which may warrant any interference in the appeal. Dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 9.5.2011 (A.N.JINDAL) preeti JUDGE 2