^' t^l^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.41^1 OF 2011 PETITIONER: RESPONDENTS: .<^.: ^ ^ ^ Tijuram. Sahu, S/o Late Shri Ramji Sahu, aged about 59 years, presently posted and working as Revenue Inspector, Revenue Circle Ahiwara, Tahsil Dhamdha, District Durg (CG). Versus ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur 2. Collector, Durg (CG). .3. Deputy Collector, Durg (CG). 4. Ajit Choubey, Revenue Inspector, Diversion Branch, District Office Durg, District Durg (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ ^..^^ ^..^<<yy ^•••y"y \k3 T--^. ^ HiGHCOURTOF CHHATTJSCSARH : BSLASPUR ^j PETiTtPNER RESPQNDENTS WRiT PETITION (S) N0. 4191 OF 2011 Tljurarri-Sahu Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others T (Writ Petition under Artscle 226 of the Conststytlon of Jndia) Slngle Bench : Hon'bie Shrl.Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri B.D.Guru, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govemment Advocate for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 02nd day of August, 2011) 1. The petitioner seeks to chailenge the Segallty and validity of the order dated 15.07.2011 (Annexure P-1) passed the respondent No.3, whereby, the petitioner has been transferred from the .post of Revenue Inspector, Revenue Circle Ahlwara, Tahsli Dhamdha to Daiilrajhara, Tahsll Dondi on administrative grounds. ,2,. Leamed counsel appearing for the petjtloner sybmits that the. petitioner is at 'the fag end of his sewice career arsd he is going to refire within a period of six months, therefore, the Impugned order Is iilegai, arbitrary and against the transfer poiicy. 3< Learned counsei appearinfl for the State respondents submits that In view of the fact, as submltted by the learned counsei for the petltioner that, ifthe petltloner is retinng withln a period of slx months, the represe-ntatlon of the petstioner shall be considered, • in accordance wlth the poljcy of the State Government, within a period oft^oweeks. 4, In view of that, no coercive steps shal! be taken against the petjtloner, tli! hls representation is decided, in the event, the representatlonis flled within a period of three days. 5. Leamed counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that in view of foregoing, nothlng survives for adjudication In the matter at this stage. 6. Accordingly, the writ petitlon stands disposed of. No order asto costs. ashok Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge