1 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 439 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 7150 OF 1999 Dr. Siddharth A. Patil. ...Plaintiff. Vs. The University of Mumbai & Ors. ....Defendants. The Indian Express Ltd. ....Applicant. ---- None for the Plaintiff. Mr. Vinayak Shete i/b Poorvi Kamani, for Applicant and Defendant Nos.6,7,8 and 9. Ms. Sheetal Sah i/b Mehta & Girdharlal, for Defendant No.10. ---- CORAM: S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 18TH SEPTEMBER 2009 P.C. 1. Although this Chamber Summons ought to have been taken out by the Plaintiff for substituting Defendant No.9 with the Applicant in view of the order the demerger granted by this court, I intend to allow the Chamber Summons even at the instance of Defendant No.9 and the Applicant as it is only a formal amendment. 2. In the circumstances, the Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer (b). Prayer (a) is rejected as the learned Advocate does not appear for Defendant No.7. Amendments to be carried out within four weeks from today. The Chamber Summons is accordingly disposed of.