(/f/ Wwj/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIsGARH AT BILAspun (c.G.) w.P. ——(—)——/l— s No.6?Z% 2010 Jhandu Lal Choudhary, aged about 6O years, S/o- Govindram, working as Assistant Teacher at Govt. Primary School Lukapara, Block- Saraipali, District.— Mahasamund (C.G.) R/o- Village~ Lukapara, District.- Post- Saraipiai, Mahasamund (C.G.) VERSUS 1./' RESPONDENTS State of‘Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, District — Mahasamund (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. r/, PETITIONER ~mm(m> } , \ mm m um § 13‘2?W ; ‘ $ aim m _ 1 3 : goN’BLE MR. JUSTxCE PRmmmR DIWAKER 3. 11.2G1Q 1 Shri-F‘Sxhare, counsel for the detitioneir. Shri Sumesh Bajaj GA for the Slate Counsel for the petitioner subinits that earlier the petitioner 1adi‘iled W.P.(S) No. 6001 [2007 whicl” was a11owed by this Court Vide rder dated 9.10,.2007 (Annexure P/5 . This Court observed that the rder of his Coult would be subject t3 al1 verifications made by the State regarding facts pleaded in the petition. Counsel for the petitioner submits that though petition of the petitioner has been allowed and respondents were under o aligation to extend benefit after necessary verification, til} date exercise of verification has not been completed. He submits that a time bound direction may be issued to complete the verification within a stipulated time State counsel submits that as the order of the Court was subject to necessary verifications, the petitioner can ciaim benefit only after due and proper verification by the competent authority. Taking into consideration the submissions made as above and also that the order was passed on 9.10.2097 in the ease of the etitioner, respondents are directed to sarry out neeessary verification s ordered by this Court earlier in its order dated 9.10.2007 in .P.(S) Nos. 6001/2007 with an outer limit of four months from the ate of receipt of copy of this orderi it would be the duty of ti‘e oetitioner to apprise the espondents about the passing of this crder. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed of. \ / Sdl— i r\ W rah grim, reraizmta ~~FS/l4’7_‘2/20l 0 i1 ,oo,ooo. ‘ I , ¥ ii Prit'mker Diwaker Judge ’t 1 A.“ ll,” s 2 ) a