IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R No. 5994 of 2011 Date of Decision:- 4.10.2011 Ashok Kumar ....Petitioner vs. Jai Rani ....Respondent *** CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR *** Present:- Mr. Vijay Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. This is tenant's revision. He is aggrieved with order dated 20.9.2011 passed by the Rent Controller, Patiala, by virtue of which his application for framing an additional issue has been dismissed. The facts are that on the pleadings, the issue “whether the applicant is entitled to ejectment of the respondent as prayed for ? OPA ”, was framed on 21.12.2006. However, when the case was at the arguments' stage, the tenant filed an application for framing an additional issue to the effect “Whether the respondent is in arrears of rent since 1.1.2000 as alleged in the petition”, which has been dismissed. Hence, the present revision. Heard. A perusal of the impugned order shows that the Rent Controller while dismissing the application has observed that the controversy which the tenant wants to raise by way of framing an additional issue, will be determined in the conclusion of issue No.1 which was already framed in the year 2006. This observation leaves no grievance to the petitioner-tenant. Consequently, there is no merit in the revision petition and the same is hereby dismissed. October 04, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR) JS JUDGE