SINGIE 8EWCM c^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF_CHHATnS6ARH ATBILASPUR W.P. (S) N0. °^ /2011 PETmONER :. .^ ^ 4/ RESPONDENTS ^"-"^ /^. ^ ^ { S^. *w- ^ Nagendra Kumar Shrivastava, S/o Shri Janardan Lal Shrivastava, aged about 47 years, working as Upper bivision Teacher, 6ovt.'Middte School, Man9amar, Block -Pali, District- Korba (C.G.) VERSUS ^: 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, b.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, bistt. - Raipur (,C.G.) 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal ^ WelfQre Department, Korba, Distt.-Korba (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Pali, Block-Pali, bistt.-Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETETCON UNDER ARTtCLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INblA 3TT^T-^T 'f^N^nt^T 9t)^i^ 'Hf^T ~^a? ^<l^ld<Lt, ^Ti1<H^I<o, [^^1K-1(4,< 3ni^r T^W ...1^.£S.1Z.^^ ^IINd! 5h^acb "I^^T' Ghs14(<n<i1Ti TTR^rf ^ f?I2t <F3i<^i< ^3:rfTW 3TT^?T SB : IHon*ble Shri Maniadra Klohan Shrlvastava, J.1 ll,.5.2011 Shri A.S. Rajput, counse] Shri A. V. Shridt for fhe petitioner. Paiiel Lawyer for tlie State/respondents, on advanc^ copy. Heard on admission. Leamed counsel appearijng for fhe petitioner submits fhat the petitioner is entitled to beijiefit of Iwo advance incroaaents on account of he having passejd B.Ed. examination before Ns appointoaient at his own cos^. It is submitted fhat fhe issue involved in ftie present petitiol sarne has been finally decided| the case ofAsha Saxena. os.l similar view in its order further draws attention of fhi^ a is no longer res integra and fhe by fhe Hon'ble Suprerae Covat in State of M.P. & Qrs., 2009 ffEO JfcEPJGR (8C) 59. It is further ^ubmitted that ttiis Court has also taken a dated 06-02-2009 passed in W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. I^jamed counsel for the petitioner Court to order dated 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeal No. 124 of 2009, wherein relying upon tfae judgment of flie Supreme Cqurt in fhe case of Asha Saxena (supra) and fhe order passed b^ this Court in another Writ Appeal [Th., ^^s\ IL<<5^1 ^3TT^^^T . , , ^ra'^T^T ^^i^'MRa Praveen ~^^ ^WM^, ^Til^^Ko, r®«ni^y 3TT^T T^^ 'WR^TWW^* ***'******'*"**'* TF^ ^^ 'fq^ST' bfcen t> No.87/2qg9,»directions have case for grant of two advance] 21-09-1974 issued by the veriiication of the facts pleadedj Leamed counsel for fh^ fhe petitioner would also be In view of the flnaUy disposed off wifh a to consider and decide the claitca advance increments as per the State of Madhya Prades|ht, pleaded in fhe petition, wifhin| date of receipt of copy of thls o^der. ^i^ila^l^ WR^rf ^ IT^ <f^<^i< ^r srf^R ^TT^r issued for consideration of fhe increments as per circiAlar dated itate of Madhya Pradesh, after in fhe petitlon. respondents submits fhat case of cotisidered on the same Unes. statem^nt made above, fhis petition is dire<(;tion to the re^ondent aufhorities of the petitioner for grant of two cir|sular dated 21-09-1974 issued by after venfication of the facts |a period of fhree months from the Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge [^ :i-