IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 9322 of 1997 Between: 1 K.Sadanandam (Died) S/o late K.Kishtayya District Co-operative Central Bank Limited, Medak at Sangareddy. 2 Smt.K.Annapoorna, W/o. Late Sri K.Sadanandam R/o. H.No.6-4-135, Sangareddy, Medak District. (R2 is impleaded as per Court Order Dt:16/3/2001 in WPMP 14583/2000.) 3 K.Srinivas S/o. late Sri K.Sadanandam R/o. H.No.6-4-135, (R2 is impleaded as per Court Order Sangareddy, Dt:16/3/2001 in WPMP 14583/2000.) Medak District. 4 K.Srilatha D/o. Late Sri K.Sadanandam R/o. H.No.6-4-135, (R2 is impleaded as per Court Order Sangareddy, Dt:16/3/2001 in WPMP 14583/2000.) Medak District. 5 K.Sri Devi D/o. Late Sri K.Sadanandam R/o. H.No.6-4-135, (R2 is impleaded as per Court Order Sangareddy, Dt:16/3/2001 in WPMP 14583/2000.) Medak District. 6 K.Gayathri D/o. Late Sri K.Sadanandam R/o. H.No.6-4-135, (R2 is impleaded as per Court Order Sangareddy, Dt:16/3/2001 in WPMP 14583/2000.) Medak District. 7 K.Shirisha D/o. Late Sri K.Sadanandam R/o. H.No.6-4-135, (R2 is impleaded as per Court Order Sangareddy, Dt:16/3/2001 in WPMP 14583/2000.) Medak District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The General Manager, District Co-operative Central Bank Limited. Medak at Sangareddy. 2 The President District Co-operative Central Bank Limited. Medak at Sangareddy. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS directing the respondent to continue the petitioner in service till he completes 60 years of age after quashing the Memo No.3183/97-98 dt.26.4.1997 issued by the 2nd respondent therein and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.BALA KRISHNA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.DURGA REDDY THIMMAYYAGIRI The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY W.P.No.9322 of 1997 O R D E R:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and hence, the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ___________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED,J _____________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY,J 24th November, 2008. PNV THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY W.P.NO.9322 OF 1997 Dt.24-11-2008