1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8950 of 2009 Mr. Ram Vithobaji Kanekar ....Petitioner Vs. Union of India through The General Manager, Central Railway C.S.T. Mumbai 400 001. ....Respondents Mr. V.K. Pradhan, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. T.J. Pandian, advocate for respondents 1-3. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND R.M.SAVANT, JJ DATED:- April 07, 2010 P.C. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. We find no infirmity either in the approach or the opinion recorded by the Tribunal in rejecting the original Application at the threshold on the finding that the explanation offered by the Petitioner for not resorting to the said proceedings for almost over four years was unacceptable. 3. In the circumstances, no interference is warranted. Dismissed. (R.M. SAVANT, J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)