IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE FRIDAY, THE 12TH JANUARY 2007 / 22ND PAUSHA 1928 WP(C).No. 1396 of 2007(N) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ R.KRISHNASWAMI, KARUPPETTYTHURA, MEENAKSHYPURAM P.O., (MEMBER NO.1053). BY ADV. SRI.V.G.SANKARAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. ELECTORAL OFFICER, MOOLATHARA SERVICE CO.OP.BANK LTD., NO.E.518, MEENAKSHIPURAM POST, PALAKKAD. 2. MANAGING COMMITTEE, MOOLATHARA SERVICE CO-OP.BANK LTD.NO.E.518, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, MOOLATHARA SERVICE CO-OP.BANK E.518, MEENAKSHIPURAM POST, PALAKKAD. 3. CO-OPERATIVE ARBITRATION COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY G.P. SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, J. ---------------------------------- W.P.(C)NO. 1396 of 2007 ---------------------------------- Dated this 12th day of January, 2007 JUDGMENT The grievance of the petitioner is that Ext.P1 Arbitration Case is pending for long before the 3rd respondent - Co- operative Arbitration Court. I do not propose to examine the genuineness of the grievance voiced by the petitioner. Since Ext.P1 is seen pending since early 2005 and since the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the pleadings have been completed in the case long ago, this writ petition will stand disposed of with the following directions: The 3rd respondent will ensure that the Ext.P1 is finally disposed of at the earliest and at any rate within four months of receiving a copy of this judgment. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE Judge dpk