1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO. 18/2011 ( Arun Kisanrao Kamble .vs. State of Maharashtra through PSO PS Parva, ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders Mr. M.P. Kariya, Advocate for Applicant. .......... CORAM : P.D. KODE, J. DATED : JANUARY 31, 2011 Heard. For the reasons recorded in the order dated 24.1.2011, the applicant was granted ad-interim protection in connection with Crime No. 69/2010 registered with Police station Parva for commission of offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 324, 307 and 325 of IPC. While issuing the said direction, certain conditions were imposed in order to see that the same does not hamper the progress of investigation in the said crime. The learned APP was not able to refute the submission of the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant had abided the conditions imposed. Similarly no further material in the shape of independent eye witnesses other than the family members of the victim has been brought to notice. The learned APP has only pointed out that the investigating officer has to 2 collect the blood sample of the applicant. No other circumstance/feature is brought to notice to vary the ad- interim direction given. Having regard to the same, there appears no plausible reason for not confirming the ad-interim direction given. Hence the ad-interim direction given on 24.1.2011 stands hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions with the addition that the applicant shall attend the Investigating Officer whenever summoned in connection with the investigation inclusive of collection of the sample. Application stands disposed of. In view of disposal of Criminal Application (ABA) No. 18/2011, Criminal Application (APPP) No. 50/2011 also stands disposed of. JUDGE halwai