IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44227 of 2010 SHAILESH KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THRU.VIG. ----------- 2 20.4.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Some of the beneficiaries are said fake including 3 residents of Uttar Pradesh and for one it is said that Rs. 5,000/- was taken by the Nazir of petitioner’s office. It appears that none of the beneficiaries are fake rather genuine persons, three of them who are said residents of U.P., have been issued BPL card meant to say that they were residing there and petitioner may have no concern with the money if really was taken by the Nazir, no doubt his fault that he has for the first time moved the Special Judge Vigilance in the year 2001 but that is explained that the jurisdiction shifted to Patna. However, the matter was complained by a non-concerned person due to his having political rivalry with Mukhiya. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on 2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Muzaffarpur in Vigilance P.S. Case No. 1/2001, Special Case No. 55/2002, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)