[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVN.APPLN.NO.459 OF 2006 IN CASE NO.135/CW OF 2000 Mr.Kailash Shantilal Jain ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... Mr.Vikas Takalkar with Anand Jondhale advocate for applicant Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : APRIL 13, 2007 DATE : APRIL 13, 2007 DATE : APRIL 13, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant who is the original complainant, is seeking return of property i.e. gold which belongs to him. The jewellery shop of the applicant came to be robbed on 18.4.1999 and about 3 kgs. of gold ornaments came to be robbed in the said robbery. Out of the said gold ornaments, police could recover only 658.220 gms. of gold in the form of gold bars as the ornaments had been [-2-] converted into gold bars. No objection has been given by the accused to the return of the said property. Moreover, the investigating officer also has no objection to the return of the said gold bars to the applicant. In this view of the matter, the said gold bars be returned to the applicant after taking photographs of the said gold bar and preparing the panchnama of the same. The said gold bar be returned to the applicant on or before 30.4.2007. 3. Application is disposed of. [Smt. V.K.Tahilramani, J.]