IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6913 of 2010 SANTOSH KUMAR MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR -- -----a---- 2 26.2.2010 Heard Mr. Mritunjay Prasad Singh No.2, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dinesh Singh, learned Addl.P.P. for the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case instituted under section 304(B)/34 of the I.P.C. The petitioner is the husband of the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during course of investigation materials have come that, as a matter of fact, deceased had herself committed suicide. However, finally charge sheet was submitted under section 304 B of the I.P.C. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. Be that as it may, this Court is not persuaded to accept the prayer for bail of the petitioner at this stage. Prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected with liberty that the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail on completion of one year in judicial custody. AnilKr.Sinha (Birendra Prasad Verma,J.)