IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41471 of 2009 INDRADEV YADAV SON OF LATE JAGDISSH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 9.3.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 386 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. From narrative of the first information report, it appears that just when the petitioner was fleeing away after having coerced the informant from parting with certain amount of money, the petitioner was arrested with arms. Strangely enough he was not remanded in the case there and then but the police waited till 13.5.2009 to remand him in the present case. In view of the fact that there is only one other case pending independent of two cases filed for the same occurrence on the same day, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in Sikandra P.S.case No.82 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of - 2 - misuse, (iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iv) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The Magistrate concerned is directed to consider amalgamation of Sikandra P.S.case No.82 of 2009 and Sikandra P.S.case No.81 of 2009 since both the cases arise out of the same occurrence. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )