^ Slngfe Bench IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR ^ w.p.ro No. S l -9 3 /2.oii, l/1 ^0fc^C PETITIONER ^amaru Lal,(_S/o. Biriram Bharti, Sarpanch, Gfam Panchayat Mohtara (S), Vikas Khand Bilaigarh, District Raipur (C.G.) -k RESPONDENTS ,^fc.l^> /^••' VEI^US l] ' Sub-Divisional Officer/Specified Officer, Bilaigarh, District Raipur {C.G.) 'jp ^ ?< <^>-%!6> ,...."•• 2] Shri S.R. Hardaye, Nayab Tahsildar, ..•••'" Ri1fli?nr}i- nistnpt Rnn ^":^T^- -^y ^,-'.,,.^'.. Bilaigarh, District Raipur (C.G.) 3]'<^^Smt. Dulavrin Bai, W/o. Bheeruram Satnami, Panch, 4] Prembhawan S/o. Ghasiyaram Satnami, Panch, 5] Smt. Lalita Bai, W/o. Dwarika Prasad Satnami, aged about 30 years, temporary Sarpanch/applicant, 6] Prahlad, S/o. Ghasiyaram Satnami, Panch, 7] Snit. Kunwarbai, W/o. Krishna Satnami, Panch, 8] Smt. Uttaribai, W/o. Heeralal Satnami, Panch, 9] Loknath, S/o. Bichandi Satnami, Panch, 10] Smt. Manbai, W/o. Mangalchand, Panch, 11] Smt. Dhanbai, W/o. Tirathram Satnami, Panch, 12] Smt. Shardabai, W/o. Kunjram Satnami, Panch 13] Smt. Sukhinbai, W/o. Arjun Satnami, Panch, 14] Smt. Lakhanbai, W/o. Awadhram Satnami, Panch, ^ 15] Smt. Upadevi, W/o. Bharatlal Bhardwaj, Panch, 16] Suklal, S/o. Kholuram Satnami, Panch, iy] Fattelal, S/o. Darasram Satnami, Panch, i8] Sahettar, S/o. Mahadeva Satnami, Panch, 19] Smt. Fulbai, W/o. Samaru Bharti, Panch, All above respondent no.3 to 19 R/o. Gram Panchayat Mohtara (S), Vikas Khand Bilaigarh, District Raipur (C.G.) ^•' 20] Upper Collector, Baloda Bazar, District Raipur (C.G.) 21] Commissioner, Raipur division, District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITVTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND/OR OTHER SUITABLE WRITfS)/DIRECTIONfS) H1CH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASFUR PETmONER WPJTPETmONVQNo. 3193 of2011 SamaruLaL RE8PONDENT8 IINN^ Aaiit VEHSU8 Sub-E^visional Officer/Specified Officer, Bilaiga-h & Others. WKII PE1IHON UNDER A^nCLE 226 QF THE CDNSTU'UTION QF INDIA 8B:Jion»bleShri Satisfa M. Aenfliotet, J. Present: Shri Manoj Pwanjpe, Advocate tbrthe i^titi^ner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Pancl Lawycr for 1lie Statc. OKl>JgRj(0«A]D (Passed on 22na day ofJune, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing fw tie petitioner saibmits ^aA thes , respondent No. 21/CottumssioaCT, Raipur Divtsion, Raipur, has enteatained a reviston against the order passed by the Add&tional Collector, Balodabazar on 30,04.2011 under the provisions of seetion 21(4) of the Panchayat Raj Adhiaiyam, 1993. The petitioner has raised an objectioa witfa regard to aiaintainability of the revision. It is fiuther conteoded that tiie sta&is ^io order ffl-anted by the resp<md^it No. 21/Commissi(mCThasrestoredback the origmal position. 2. Be tiiat as it may, since fhe applteaticm <rf llie petitiotiar raisiag objection with regard to mamtamability of revision ia p^NJiag considCTmg^ it would be just axid pr<^r not to iirtejCfore at tihis stage. 3. However, havmg regard to the &cte situation of Ifae case, fee respoiident No. 21/eommissionBar is dto-eGted to considler fhe application of ifiie petitioner at tiie eariiest prdferaMy within a period oftburweeks and pass appn^niate ord@r in acconlaiice witfi law, It is furttier made clear Ifaat observatioiis madte herein&bov®.if any. shall not<x>me m way oftfaerespondetxtNo, 21/Conmiissiotier to considerthe objection offhe petitioner. 4. With flie atoresaid observ^ioo and directioiL, the writ petition is disposedof. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge