CWP(T) No. 5106 of 2008 (OA 963/98) 03.05.2010 Present: Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate, vice Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. A. K. Vashishta, Advocate, for respondent No. 1. Mr. R. M. Bisht, Dy. Advocate General, for respondents No. 2 and 3. After the matter was heard for some time learned Counsel representing the petitioner fairly stated that his client shall be content if a direction is issued to respondent No. 2 to decide the petitioner’s representation in terms of the recommendations made by the Managing Director of the respondent Corporation vide letter dated 22.2.1997 (Annexure A-13). 2. Petitioner is aggrieved of the fact that even though the post of Manager/Handicrafts Officer and Manager stands redesignated, entitling them to a higher pay scale, person working in the accounts department as an Accounts Officer has been left out. This aspect of the State shall be considered while deciding the representation. 3. Mr. Umesh Kanwar, learned vice counsel has also invited my attention to the following decisions: Food Corporation of India and others versus Parashotam Das Bansal and others, (2008) 5 SCC 100 and A. Satyanarayana and others versus S. Purushotham and others, (2008) 5 SCC 416. While deciding the representation the respondent shall also consider the ratio of law laid down therein. The representation shall be decided within a period of twelve weeks from the receipt of the certified copy of the order. Needless to add before -2- deciding the same, adequate opportunity of hearing/representation shall be afforded to the petitioner and the decision be communicated to him. Petition disposed of. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. May 03, 2010 (PK)