IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1790 of 2011 MUKHTIYAR RAM & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------- 04/ 25.1.2011 At the very outset, it is pointed out on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioners that mentioned slip was filed on behalf of the petitioners but inadvertence in place of Cr. Misc. no. 1790/2011 in daily cause list at serial no.3 under heading to be mentioned Cr. Misc. no. 1790/2010 has been printed but the file of Cr. Misc. no. 1790/2011 is available before this court. The file of Cr. Misc. no. 1790/2011 is placed before me. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that vide order no.3 dated 20.1.2011 prayer for bail of petitioner no.1 Mukhtiyar Ram was dismissed being infructous because it was informed by the learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner no.1 died. He submits that as a matter of fact, petitioner no.4, namely, Ram Prasad Ram died while he was in jail custody but it was wrongly placed before this court that petitioner no.1 Mukhtiyar Ram died. So, aforesaid order dated 20.1.2011 be modified to the above stated extent. A perusal of the impugned order reveals that the case of petitioner no.1 as well as petitioner no.4 are almost on similar footing. In the aforesaid circumstances, in order no.3 dated 20.1.2011 in place of petitioner no.1, namely, Mukhtiyar Ram, petitioner no.4, namely, Ram Prasad Ram be read and furthermore, in last paragraph of the aforesaid order in place of Ram Prasad Ram - 2 - petitioner no.1 Mukhtiyar Ram be read . The order dated 20.1.2011 stands modified to the above stated extent. Let this order be communicated to the CJM, Sasaram, Rohtas in connection with Sasaram Town P.S. Case no. 140 of 2004 through FAX at the cost of the petitioners. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)