IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA SECOND APPEAL NO. 119 OF 2005 SHRI VITHOBA NAGU ADEL, MARGAO GOA ....Appellant Versus SHRI JACINTO D'SOUZA(SIN.DEC.) ....Respondents THROUGH HIS L.R.'S AND ORS., Shri Mahesh Amonkar, Advocate for the Appellant - absent. Shri Hyder Khilji, Advocate for Respondent No. 4 - absent. Coram:- P.V. KAKADE, J. Date:- 18th September, 2006 P.C.: None appears for either of the parties. By order dated 14/08/2006, it was directed that, in view of the facts and circumstances, the matter could be worked out finally at the stage of admission and, therefore, fresh notices were to be issued. However, process fee and copies were not supplied and, therefore, notices could not be issued. There is no explanation as to why this lapse has occured. In view of this aspect, appeal stands dismissed for default. P.V. KAKADE, J. NH