- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.1332 OF 2000 NO.1332 OF 2000 NO.1332 OF 2000. Global Housing Finance Corporation Ltd. ..Plaintiffs. vs. Mr. Praveen Kumar Padgaonkar & Ors. ..Defendants. .... Mr.R.C. Dubey, i/b. M/s Sanjeev Kanchan & Co., for the Plaintiffs. None for the Defendants. .... CORAM CORAM CORAM: S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 7TH JANUARY 2009 : 7TH JANUARY 2009 : 7TH JANUARY 2009. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The learned counsel appearing for the plaintiffs states that all the assets/ liabilities of the plaintiffs have been transferred to H.D.F.C. In view thereof, the plaintiffs asked for return of all the papers from the advocates which were returned under cover of plaintiffs’ Advocates letter dated 18th December 2008. A fax copy of the said letter which bears the endorsement "Returned" of the plaintiffs’ representative, is produced before this Court. 2. From the said letter, it is also clear that the advocate for the plaintiffs have informed the plaintiffs that the suit is kept for final hearing and the same may appear in the month of January 2009. The advocate for - 2 - the plaintiffs have informed the Court that they have spoken to the plaintiffs over the telephone today and informed them that the matter is on board. However, the plaintiffs have informed them that they are not concerned with the said suit since their assets/liabilities have been transferred to HDFC and that they have already informed HDFC about the pendency of the suit. 3. In view of the aforesaid facts, it is clear that the plaintiffs are not interested in prosecuting the suit. The suit is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. [S.J.KATHAWALLA, [S.J.KATHAWALLA, [S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.] J.] J.]