1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8287 OF 2010 Pravin s/o Ashok Patil .. PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & another .. RESPONDENTS Mr. V.B. Patil, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.N. Jadhav, AGP for the State. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 13 th SEPTEMBER, 2010. PER COURT : 1 Notice as contemplated under section 78 of the Maharashtra Co- operative Societies Act was issued to the petitioner as he has incurred disqualification within meaning of section 73 (ff) of the Act. It is the contention of the petitioner that action under section 78 of the Act can be taken against him in respect of disqualification and remedy available is only to proceed under section 91 of the Act. The argument is devoid of any substance. Petitioner, however, shall have liberty to raise all the contentions before the Assistant Registrar and the Assistant Registrar may after 2 considering the contentions those would be raised by the petitioner, decide the issue and pass appropriate order under section 78 of the Act. No interference is called for in the instant petition. Petition stands rejected. 2 Pending civil application, if any, does not survive and stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp8287.10.odt