IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 10702 of 2011-A. Decided on: December 12, 2011. 1. Vijay Kumar S/o Sh. Duni Chand V.P.O. Haripur Distt. Kangra, Presently working as Drawing Master at Govt. Middle School Bandla, Distt. Chamba, H.P. 2. Sushama Devi W/o Vijay Kumar Vill. Denth, P.O. Samot, Sub-Tehsil Sihunta, Distt Chamba presently working as Language Teacher at Govt. High School Tralla Distt. Chamba. 3. Badru Ram S/o Sh. Jagat Ram Vill. Naghoga, P.O. Samot, Tehsil Bhathiyat, Distt. Chamba, presently working as Govt. Primary School Bharalla, Tehsil Salooni, Distt.Camba. 4. Krishan Kumar Nag S/o Sh. Sukh Dyal Nag, Vill. Malhra P.O. Sihunta, Distt. Chamba presently working as PET, Govt. Middle School Tikkri Distt. Chamba. 5. Vijay Kumar S/o Sh. Kishor Chand, V.P.O. Katholi, Tehsil Jawali, Distt. Chamba, Presently retired. 6. Rajinder Kumar S/o Sh. Bihari Lal, V.P.O. Nagrota Surian, Tehsil Jawali, Distt. Kangra, Presently retired. ……Petitioners. Versus 1. State of Himachal Pradesh through Secretary Education to the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh Shimla. 2. Director Higher Education Shinmla-1 H.P. 3. Deputy Director of Elementary/Higher Education Chamba H.P. …….Respondents. 2 Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP No. 4550 of 2010, Ravi Kumar versus State of H.P. & anr. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents concerned to examine the matter in the light of the judgment, referred to above and take appropriate action thereon within a period of four months from the date of production of copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copy of the judgment, referred to above. Needless to say, that the eligible consequential benefits shall also be disbursed within the said period. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 12th December, 2011. (Justice Dev Darshan Sud), (vs) Judge.