1. IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.137 of 1990 Date of Decision: 23.04.2010 Gram Panchyat, Dandama ...Petitioner Versus The Deputy Commissioner, Bhiwani and another .....Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh Present: Mr. R.S. Mittal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Atul Gaur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Girhotra, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Mr. R.S. Mittal, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Atul Gaur, Advocate appearing for the petitioner states if respondent-State is willing to take decision on the representation of the petitioner-Gram Sabha then petitioner shall move representation about the grievances before the Deputy Commissioner-respondent No.1. Learned counsel for the State states that in case representation is moved, decision thereon shall be taken within a month thereafter. Mr. R.S. Mittal, Sr. Advocate further states that in view of statement given by the learned counsel for the respondents writ petition has become infructuous and petitioner shall move representa- tion within a month before respondent No.1. In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition with aforesaid liberty. Writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh representation before respondent No.1. Re CWP No.137 of 1990 2. spondents shall take decision thereon within a month thereafter by speaking order. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (ALOK SINGH) JUDGE 23.04.2010 sharmila