1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.02.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN W.P.(MD)No.192 of 2011 Seeni Kathijathul Kubura : Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Tahsildar, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to issue patta in favour of the petitioner's land in Survey No.158/4 for an extent of 95 cents and Survey No.150/2 for an extent of 7 cents in Kuvayankudi Group, Sakkarakottai Firka, Sathankulam Village, Ramanathapuram Taluk and District. For Petitioner :No appearance For Respondents :Mr.K.A.Nandagopal Additional Government Pleader O R D E R The petitioner seeks a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to issue patta in respect of the property in Survey No.158/4 and in Survey No.150/2 having an extent of 95 cents and 7 cents respectively in Kuvayankudi Group, Sakkarankottai Firka, Sathankulam Village, Ramanathapuram Taluk and District. 2. None appears for the petitioner. Heard the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents. 3. According to the petitioner, there was a family partition, in which, she was allotted an extent of 95 cents in Survey No.158/4 and 7 cents in Survey No.150/2. Though an application was submitted to the first respondent for issuing patta as early as on 16.08.2010, the said application was not considered. Therefore, the petitioner was constrained to file this writ petition for issuing a Writ of Mandamus. 4. The only grievance of the petitioner is on account of non- consideration of her application dated 16.08.2010. The issue, as to whether the petitioner has made out a case for issuing patta in respect of the property mentioned in her representation is a matter to be considered by the second respondent. Hence, I am of the view that the interest of justice would be sub-served in case the petitioner is https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 permitted to make an application to the second respondent and in the event of making any such application within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the same shall be considered by the second respondent on merits and as per law. The said exercise shall be completed within three months thereafter. 5. The Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No Costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (P&A) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Tahsildar, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. +1cc to The Special Government Pleader, Advocate SR.4190 +1cc to Mr.J.M.Hassanul Bazari, Advocate SR.4353 rj2 SR : 14.02.2011 : 2p/5c W.P.(MD)No.192 of 2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/