R.F.A. No. 5060 of 2008 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.F.A. No. 5060 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision :28.10.2010. Ramotar and others .... Appellants vs. State of Haryana and others .... Respondents Coram : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. D. D. Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Chiranji Lal, Advocate for Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Advocate, for the HSIIDC. RAJESH BINDAL, J The landowners have filed the present appeal seeking enhancement of compensation for the acquired land. Briefly the facts are that vide notification dated 12.9.1992 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act') the State of Haryana acquired land in the revenue estate of village Bawal, District Rewari for setting up of Growth Centre at Bawal by HSIIDC. The same was followed by notification dated 3.9.1993 issued under Section 6 of the Act. The Land Acquisition Collector awarded compensation @ ` 1,10,000/- per acre for chahi, ` 85,000/- per acre for barani, ` 1,10,000/- per acre for gair mumkin, ` 1,25,000/- per acre near road and ` 2,00,000/- per acre near National Highway upto depth of two acres. The reference filed by the landowners was allowed by the learned court below and they were awarded compensation @ ` 5,20,000/- per acre for all types of land upto the depth of 500 meters on both sides of NH No. 8 and NH No. 71 (Rewari-Bawal Road), and ` 3,20,000/- per acre for the the remaining land. Aggrieved against the award of learned Court below, the landowners are before this Court. Learned counsel for the parties submitted that the issues raised in the present appeal are squarely covered by judgment of this court in RFA No. 3323 of 2005 – Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation and another vs Gindori and others, decided on 23.8.2010. R.F.A. No. 5060 of 2008 (2) In view of the above, the appeal is disposed of in terms of aforesaid judgment. Before this court, the landowners have filed application seeking impleadment of legal representatives of deceased Smt. Murti Devi on the basis of a will. Notice was directed to be issued to all the legal representatives of deceased Smt. Murti Devi, however, their service could not be completed. This court would not like to keep the main appeal seeking enhancement of compensation pending in this court for that reason. The other appeals arising out of the acquisition have already been decided. The question regarding legal representatives of deceased Smt. Murti Devi is left open. The fact as to who are the persons entitled to receive compensation on account of death of Smt. Murti Devi, shall be considered by the Executing Court. 28.10.2010. (Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge