1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10098 OF 2009 Deepak Keshavrao Satoskar Petitioner versus Waman Gobind Kulkarni Respondent Sathyam Acharya for petitioner. M.S.Lagu for respondent. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 11th March 2010 PC : 1. By the impugned order the learned Trial Judge has permitted the respondent to amend the plaint. The order impugned is purely of interlocutory nature which is capable of being challenged in an appeal which may be preferred by the petitioner against the decree passed in the suit, if the same be adverse to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondents stated that the respondent does not intend to challenge that part of the impugned order by which part of the proposed amendment has not been allowed. 2. Subject to what is observed above, no case for interference is made out. The writ petition is rejected accordingly. If no additional written statement is filed by the petitioner till today, the same shall be filed within eight weeks from today. (A.S.OKA, J.)