IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 22ND JUNE 2009 / 1ST ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 17226 of 2009(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ 1. SAJITH LAL, PEON, THE TANUR CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LIMITED, NO.M.510, KUTTIPPILAN PLAZA, NEAR BUS STAND, P.O.TANUR, PIN-676302. 2. RAKESH K.S., NIGHT WATCHMAN, THE TANUR CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LIMITED, NO.M.510, KUTTIPPILAN PLAZA, NEAR BUS STAND, P.O.TANUR, PIN-676302. BY ADV. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN SRI.BENOJ C AUGUSTIN SRI.RAJAN VELLOTH SRI.SAIJO HASSAN SRI.A.S.SABU SRI.PRATHAP PILLAI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, MALAPPURAM. 4. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES(GENERAL), TIRUR. WPC NO.17226/09 -2- 5. THE TANUR CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., NO.M.510, KUTTIPPILAN PLAZA, NEAR BUS STAND, P.O.TANUR, PIN-676302, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 6. THE CHAIRMAN, THE TANUR CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., NO.M.510, KUTTIPPILAN PLAZA,NEAR BUS STAND, P.O.TANUR, PIN-676302. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 17226 OF 2009 (W) ===================== Dated this the 22nd day of June, 2009 J U D G M E N T The first petitioner is a peon and the 2nd petitioner is a night duty watchman working under the 5th respondent Bank. Ext.P1 is the appointment order that has been issued to them. The complaint in this writ petition is regarding the salary, DA, Provident Fund and the bonus that is allegedly due to them. It is seen that the first petitioner has raised his grievances before respondents 3 to 5 by filing Exts.P5 to P7 and the second petitioner has raised his grievances before the aforesaid respondents by filing Exts.P8 to P10. It is at that stage, this writ petition has been filed praying for an order requiring the respondents to remedy their grievances. 2. A reading of this writ petition show that though the petitioners have raised their objections before respondents 3 to 5 and that the aforesaid respondents have not so far considered the grievance. Atleast at this stage, I feel it is for the 1st respondent to consider the grievance and pass orders thereon. 3. Taking into account the pendency of the grievances WPC 17226/09 :2 : before the 5th respondent, their employer, I feel it is only appropriate that the 5th respondent considers this matter. Therefore, I direct the 5th respondent to deal with Exts.P7 and P10, if these representations have been received and are pending. Orders on the representations shall be passed, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 6 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp