IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE. P.S.GOPINATHAN TUESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2011/15TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 RP.No. 857 of 2011 ( ) ---------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OPCAT.2411/2011 DATED 11-10-2011 REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENTS IN THE OP.: ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, BHARATH SANCHAR NIGAM LTD, SANCHAR BHAVAN NEW DELHI. 2. THE PRINCIPAL GENERAL MANAGER, TELECOM, BSNL, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER(SFMSS) TELECOM, BSNL, CENTRAL TELEGRAPH OFFICE, ERNAKULAM KOCHI - 682016. 4. THE SUB DIVISIONAL ENGINEER (ADM), OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL GENERAL MANAGER, ERNAKULAM. 5. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, TELECOMMUNICATION,BSNL, KERALA CIRCLE TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.C.S.RAMANATHAN RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONERS IN THE OP.,: -------------------------------------------------- 1. P.M.HANEEFA, TEMPORARY STATUS MAZDOOR, CENTRAL TELEGRAPH OFFICE, KOCHI-682 016. 2. P.K.YESUDAS, TEMPORARY STATUS MAZDOOR, TELEGRAPH OFFICE,PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI-682 025. RESPONDENTS BY M.V.SOMARAJAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-12- 2011, ALONG WITH R.P.NO.858/2011 IN OP(CAT) NO.457/2011 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: RP NO.857/2011 APPENDIX REVIEW PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ANNEXURE-A : COPY OF ORDER DATED 20/07/2004 AND THE EXTRACT OF THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE. jg C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. .................................................................... R.P.Nos.857 of 2011 in OP(CAT) No.2411 of 2011 & 858 of 2011 in OP(CAT) No.457 of 2011 .................................................................... Dated this the 6th day of December, 2011. O R D E R Gopinathan, J. Petitions are filed seeking review of our common judgment in OP(CAT) Nos.2411/2011 & 457/2011 dated 11/10/2011 based on Annexure A produced. We have gone through Annexure A. It is a copy of the minutes of the meeting of the Board of Directors of the BSNL. We find that for any decision of the Board of Directors, we have to review our judgment. We have considered the case on merits, and in our opinion, the judgment in no way requires any review. The Review Petitions are devoid of any merit. 2. Learned counsel for the Review Petitioners sought three months' time to comply with the directions in the judgment. We record the submission. Learned counsel also sought for waiving the liability to pay costs. Having considered the entire facts and circumstances, we R.P.Nos.857 & 858/2011 2 grant three months' time from today to the review petitioners to comply with the judgment. In the event the judgment is complied within the above three months, the cost ordered in the judgment sought to be reviewed would stand waived. In the event the review petitioners did not comply with the judgment within the time limit now extended, we further direct that the Officers responsible shall be personally liable for the cost, which we fix at Rs.25,000/- in each case. The BSNL shall pay the cost first and then realize from the responsible officers. These Review Petitions are dismissed as above. Sd/- (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) Sd/- (P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE) jg