SCA/3716/1987 1/3 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 3716 of 1987 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ ================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ================================================= NATIONAL TEXTILE CORPNTYTEZXTI - Petitioner Versus MILL KAMDAR MANDAL - Respondent ================================================= Appearance : M/S. NANAVATI & NANAVATI for Petitioner. MR DS VASAVADA for Respondent. ================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ Date : 22/12/2005 SCA/3716/1987 2/3 JUDGMENT ORAL JUDGMENT 1.The petitioner, namely, National Textile Corporation having one of its Units viz. Rajkot Textile Mills, Rajkot has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for quashing and setting aside the award passed by the Industrial Court, Rajkot in Misc. Application No. (IC) 1 of 1986 on 30.04.1987. 2.The petition was admitted and rule was issued on 27.07.1987. While issuing rule, this Court has passed an order granting interim relief only in respect of payments of the past interim relief at the rate of Rs. 70/-. As far as the future payment is concerned, the petitioner was directed to pay as and from July, the amount payable for the month of July will be paid on or before 10.08.1987 and the subsequent payment of interim relief will be made on 10th of every SCA/3716/1987 3/3 JUDGMENT succeeding month thereafter. 3.Ms. Vidhi Shodhan, learned advocate appearing for Nanavati & Nanavati for the petitioner, on instruction from Mr. K.H. Rangrej, Factory Manager has submitted that the award passed by the Industrial Court has been fully complied with and all payments have been made to the workmen. In this view of the matter, the petition may be disposed of as having become infructuous. 4.In the above view of the matter, this petition is accordingly disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule discharged without any order as to costs. [K.A. PUJ, J.] Savariya