: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY PETITION NO.487 OF 1999 COMPANY PETITION NO.487 OF 1999 COMPANY PETITION NO.487 OF 1999 In the matter of Sections 433, 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956; And In the matter of Cana Glass Limited Mrs.Nalini Manohar Daryanani .. Petitioner None for petitioner. M/s.Mulla & Mulla & CBC for respondent. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATE : 3rd December, 2007. DATE : 3rd December, 2007. DATE : 3rd December, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . None appears for the petitioner. Counsel for the respondent submits that BIFR proceedings culminated with order against the respondent, which matter was taken up in Appeal before the AAIFR. The respondent has succeeded in that Appeal and the matter has again been restored to the file of BIFR for consideration afresh on merits. In other words, BIFR proceedings are still pending. As none appears for the petitioner and for the aforesaid reason, petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)