^o^7 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRITPETITION(S) No. 3544 of2008 Virendra Kumar Baghel Age about 36 years, Head Master S/o Shri Purii'am Dhritlahre, Govt. Primarv School Bhanbeda Block - Bhanupratappur Distt. Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Throu^i Secretary Tribal Welfare Department & Education Department D.K.8. Bhawan, Distt. ~ Raipur (C.G.) 2. Astt. Cormiiissioner Trible Welfare Department Kariker Distt. Kanker (C.G.) 3. Distt. Education Officen Kanker, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) 4. Block Education OfFicer, Bhanupratappur- Distt. Kanker(C.G.) 5. Treasury, Account & Penssion Kanker, Distt. Kanker(C.G.) WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon*Me Shri Satish K. AsEirihotri, J. Present: ShriSomkant Verma, Advocate t<ir the petitioner. Sliri Arun Sao, Govemnient Advocate forthe State/respoiidents, ORALORDER (Passed on 08tt day of July, 2008) 1. With the consent offhe parties- the matter is taken up for hearmg fmally. 2. Leamed counsel appearing fbr the petitioner submits that the petitioner has obtained D.Ed certificate at his own expenses during sendce. 3. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the tact and question ofiaw involved in the present writ petition are the same to that ofin Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Mumcipal Corporation, Diirg and another {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in term.s ofthe order passed m the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj (s^om), subject to verification of the fact asto whether the petitioner has: acquired B.Ed/D.Ed/B.TJ/M.Ed Exaoimation Certificate cn his own expenses as per the ci.rcula.rs dated 13.09.1974, 24.12.1998 aiid 01.03.1999 and fiirther whether he has been paid two advance mcrements or not. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge Tlialor