-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2606 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2606 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2606 OF 2007 IN IN IN APPEAL (L.) NO. 565 OF 2007 IN Company Application NO.675 OF 2006 IN Company PETITION NO.895/1998 Dena Bank & Ors. .. Appellants. V/s. 1. Amar Dyechem Ltd., & Ors. .. Respondents. --- Mr.Umesh Shetty i/by Shukla & Shukla for the Appellants. Ms.Deepali Bhalekar i/by Bilawala & Co. for the Respondents. ---- CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & SRI ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. SRI ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. SRI ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : 14TH DECEMBER, 2007 DATED : 14TH DECEMBER, 2007 DATED : 14TH DECEMBER, 2007 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. :- . Heard learned counsel for the Appellants and learned counsel for the Respondents. Perused the affidavit in support of the notice of motion as well as affidavit in reply and the affidavit in rejoinder filed on behalf of the respondents. Sufficient cause is made out by the appellants for condoning the delay in filing the appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellants. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). -: 2 :- (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)