THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND THE HONBLE DR.JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU WRIT APPEAL NO.1999 OF 2005. DATED:24-10-2005 Between V.V.Raghavendra Rao son of Venkata SubbaRao, age 47 yrs Booking conductor, Staff No.E96220 Out of Designation Staff duties, Pandit Nehru bus station, Vijayawada ….Appellant And 1. A.P.State Road Transport Corporation rep. By its V.C. & M.D.Musheerabad, Hyderabad and 3 others …Respondents JUDGMENT (Per Sri B.Prakash Rao, J) Heard both sides and at their request, the main appeal itself is taken up for disposal. This appeal is filed against the orders passed by the learned single Judge refusing to grant interim direction sought for by the petitioner/appellant. It is the case of the appellant that having regard to the posting, the same may sought to be disturbed, the disability from which he is suffering and in spite of representation, the same were not properly considered. The learned single Judge did not find favour with the petitioner holding that the petitioner has no right to continue at a particular place or post and it is always open for the respondents to take decision. Having considered the submissions made and the nature of order more so, in view of the interim direction given and especially having regard to the discretion exercised by the learned single Judge that the petitioner cannot claim any such relief for giving posting and continue, we do not find any merits in this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. However, it is needless to mention that the respondents shall take into consideration the representation of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders. No costs. ------------------------ B.PRAKASH RAO, J Dated: 24-10-2005. ------------------------- G.YETHIRAJULU, J Hsd