IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 5284 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT ========================================================= 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO ---------------------------------------------------------- HALOL TAL.PANCHAYAT THROUGH CHAIRMAN EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Versus STATE OF GUJARAT LNS MUKUNDAN OR HIS SUCCESSOR ----------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR BM MANGUKIYA for Petitioner Mrs. Siddhi D.Talati,AGP for respondent Nos.1 & 4. MR MUKESH R SHAH for Respondent No. 2 & 3. ------------------------------------------------------------ CORAM : MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT Date of decision: 16/04/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT On a joint request of the learned counsel for the respective parties this petition is taken up for final hearing today. As a result of the hearing and discussion and on a perusal of the affidavit on record it is found that Jawahar Rojgar Yojna has been renamed as Suvarna Jayanti Gram Swarojgar Yojana and there is some change as well in the sanctioning authority as also the implementing agency. In view of these changes and in view of the affidavits on record it is directed that the concerned authority will examine and apply their minds to the necessary administrative sanction under the latter Yojna for the implementation of the works mentioned in the schedule appended to Annexure "A" to the petition (Serial Nos. 1 to 7 of Item No.1). 2. On such administrative sanction being granted by the concerned authority and to the extent that sanction is granted, the implementation of such works shall be entrusted to the appropriate Panchayat. 3. It is directed accordingly. 4. On the basis of the aforesaid directions learned counsel for the petitioner does not press for any further relief in the present petition. Petition is accordingly disposed of and Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent with no orders as to costs. Notice as to interim relief shall stand discharged. ====== (rmr).