HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 3576 OF 2009 Thursday, the thirteenth Day of August, Two Thousand and Nine Between A.V.K. Viswanadha Raju Petitioner AND Sri Ahmed Nawaz Aladin and others Respondents THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI C.R.P. NO. 3576 OF 2009 ORAL ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is preferred by the plaintiff aggrieved by the order dated 08.07.2009 passed by the learned VIII Additional Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, in I.A. No. 332 of 2008 in O.S. No. 883 of 2005 dismissing the petition filed under Section 38(2) of the Indian Stamp Act to send Deed of Sub-Lease dated 25.9.2003 for impounding. The petitioner herein filed the above suit against the respondents seeking perpetual injunction for their interference with his peaceful possession over the suit schedule property. It is his case that in view of urgency at the time of filing the suit, he did not get the Deed of Sub- lease dated 25.9.2003 impounded and, therefore, prayed the court below to send the same to the Collector/Revenue Authorities for impounding the document; while it is the case of the respondents that the said document dated 25.9.2003, basing on which the claim is made, is for a period of 57 years and, hence, it is compulsorily regiterable in terms of the Registration Act. The court below on a consideration of the material, dismissed the petition by the order impugned. Hence, the present revision petition by the plaintiff. It is not in dispute that the document dated 25.9.2003 is for a period of 57 years. This is the document, basing on which the suit is filed. The document is compulsorily registrable under the provisions of Sec. 17 of the Registration Act. Having gone through the entire material available on record, I do not find any illegality or irregularity warranting interference in the impugned order. Consequently, the Civil Revision Petition fails and is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ____________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari August 13, 2009 MAS