IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18752 of 2010 KARU @ KARU YADAV @ PARMANAND YADAV, son of late Lal Yadav Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5/- 03.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for State. Admittedly, neither petitioner is named in the First Information Report nor anything has been recovered from his conscious possession. It appears from perusal of the Case Diary as well as submission of learned P.P. that petitioner carries some criminal history and while he was caught in connection with one case one of the witnesses of this case went to the Police Station and claimed to have identified the petitioner as one of the culprits of this case but subsequently when petitioner was put on Test Identification Parade, the informant could not succeed to identify the petitioner which is evident from perusal of paragraph 109 of the Case Diary. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, above named petitioner, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-1, Nawada in Sessions Trial No. 117 of 2010 and 22 of 2010 arising out of Warsaliganj P.S. Case No. 127 of 2009 subject to the condition that one of the sureties must be a close relative of the petitioner. Ashwini/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)