../'' ..-s HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRITPETITIONCS) No. 3988 of2007 Dr. Vinay Kumar Pathak Aged about 62 yeais, S/o Late Shri Sundarlal Patfaak, R/o. C-62, Agye Nagar Bilaspur, Tahsil & District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS : 1) State of ChhattisgarfL Through Ihe Secretary, Department of Hi^tier Edueation, Maatralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.O.) 2) The Secretary, General AdmimstFative DeparbnenL Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF WDIA Slnete Bench : Hon'Me Justfee Shri Sattsh K. Aenihotri. Present: ShriAnand Kumar Tiwari, Advoeate for the petitioner. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. Advoeate forthe State/respondente. ORDER (Passed (MI 1 lm day of July, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the petiticaier seeks pemussion ofthis Court to withdraw this petition with Uberty to make representation before Ifae concemed autilorities, which may be decided in aceordance with law, to wtoeh the leamed counsd appearing for the State/respondents has no objectioa. B is ordered acewdingly. In the evant, aay representation is made, the aulhorities are directedto cotisida- the rqM-esentation ofthe petitioner in accordance with Clause 7 afthe Transfer Polic>' Year 2007-2008, dated 13th June, 2007, to post the petitioner in his home District, within a period ofthree weeks from the date ofreceiptofflie representati<Mi. If possible, the posting of ttie jpetitimier may not be distnnsed till the disposal ofthe representation. In view of the above, Ihe petition is dismissed as withdrawa vrith Ae above stated liberty. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Asnihotri Judge Afflit