IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 3618 of 2009 Between: G.P. Kiran Kumar, S/o. G. Moses, H.No. 3-1-39/15, Charch Compound, Armoor, Nizamabad District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Govt. of A.P. Rep by its Principal Secretary, Housing Department, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Managing Director, AP State Housing Corporation Ltd,. Hyderabad. 3 The District Collector/Executive Director, AP State Housing Corporation Limited, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the claim of the petitioner for regularization of services as work inspector even though he is fully eligible and qualified as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently to direct the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner in par with his juniors with all consequential benefits and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.NAYAKAWADI RAMESH Counsel for the Respondents: MR.P.UDAYA BHASKARA RAO The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No . 3618 of 2009 ORDER: 1. The petitioner was appointed as N.M.R, Work Inspector (Technical) vide proceedings No. DEE(H)BDN/47/A dated 1.7.1990. His services came to be terminated vide proceedings No.E1/481/2002 dated 17.12.2003 . He challenged the termination proceedings by way of appeal. His appeal did not yield any fruitful results. Therefore, he approached this court by filing W.P.No. 15339 of 2008 and the writ petition came to be disposed of at the admission stage directing the Government – the first respondent to pass order on the proposal submitted by the Managing Director-cum- the second respondent. The Government- the first respondent passed orders vide G.O.Rt.No.316 dated 21.11.2008 reinstating him into service. Thereupon, the Managing Director- the second respondent issued consequential orders vide proceedings No.A4/2351/2008 dated 12.12.2008 and accordingly the petitioner reported duty and has been working in the office of the General Manager, APSHCL, Nizamabad District. He submitted a representation for regularization of his services. His grievance is that his junior Mr.K.Vasaraiah and others were regularized, whereas his claim for regularization was not considered. 2. When the writ petition came up for admission, the learned standing counsel for A.P. Housing Board takes notice on behalf of respondents 2 and 3. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that his representation dated 16.1.2009 remained unattended. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 16.01.2009 and pass appropriate orders and communicate the same to the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. __________________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY,J 25-02-2009 Note: C.C. in three days. B/o. Stp ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RLD} THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 3618 of 2009 25/02/2009