IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 21ST JUNE 2010 / 31ST JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 17291 of 2010(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- C.S.KUNJARU, AGED 63 YEARS, S/O.SAIDU, CHOLAN HOUSE, CHERUVALLOOR, THRISSUR - 680 321. BY ADV. SRI.M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM SRI.JYOTHISH.J.KALLINGAL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE KERALA SMALL INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED, (SIDCO), P.B.NO.50, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (REVENUE RECOVERY) MUKUNDAPURAM, THRISSUR DIST. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, K.V.MURI, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DIST. ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP FOR R1 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MATHEW GEORGE VADAKKEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/06/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J -------------------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 17291 OF 2010 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of June, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner is challenging the correctness and sustainability of Ext.P34 notice issued under the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act demanding a total sum of Rs.11,03,240/- with subsequent interest and collection charges. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that, there is no proper quantification at all and that the petitioner has already filed Ext.P29 representation before the Minister for Industries, which is stated as forwarded to and is pending before the 1st respondent. The learned counsel however submits that, the petitioner will submit an exhaustive representation before the 1st respondent, also with reference to the figures contained in Ext.P34 and that the same may be directed to be finalised after giving an opportunity of hearing. 3. The learned standing counsel appearing for the first respondent submits that, the grievance, if any, with regard to the quantification of course will be considered if the petitioner prefers a proper representation and further steps will be pursued, only subject to the orders to be passed in the above proceedings. 4. In the above circumstance, the petitioner is permitted to file a 2 WP(C) No. 17291/2010 detailed representation in respect of Ext.P34 before the 1st respondent within two weeks; on which event, the same shall be considered and appropriate orders shall be passed after hearing the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month thereafter. Subject to this, the recovery proceedings stated as being pursued against the petitioner shall be kept in abeyance. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE dnc