<y$ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR W.P. (S) No. 6649 of 2007 Pravin Kumar Mishra S/o Lata Shri Ramlakhan Mishra Age about 32 years, R/o Working as post of Assistant Teachar, Govt. Girl Primaxy School Sarkanda, Biiaspur (C.G.) PETITIONER Versus RESPONDENTS 1 State Govt. of Chhattisgarh 8n Through Secretary, Educational Depaxment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Distt— Rai'pur (co) 2 Distn'ct Education Oiiicer Bilaspur, Distt ~ Bilaspur (C. G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 \OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Shri Amit Shanna, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sumit Verma, Panel Lawyer for the State on advance copy. ORAL ORDER (02.11.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J Heard on admission. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petin’oner has passed D.Ed. examination on his own expenses, themfore, he is entitled to receive two advance increments according to circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999. He also submits that in many identical matters, the petitions have been allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadm“ Vs. Municigai Cowration, Durq and another {2006 (m MPJR-CG 96}. He submits that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the said judgment. This legal position is not disputed by the leained counsel for the State. However, he submits that the order may he passed in terms of the said judgment, but it shall be subjected to verification regarding petitioner’s such qualiiication. Accordingly; this writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Mnictpal 2 Q4 W.P.(S) No. 6649/2007 Corporation, Durg and another (Supra) subject to veriocation of thc facts as to whether 1:116 petitioner had acquired D.Ed. Examination Certjflcate on his own expenses as per circulars dated 24. 12. 1998 and 01.03. 1999 and further Whether he has been paid two advance increments or not The petition stands tinally disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/— Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge