1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 4059/2007 (Vidarbha General Kamgar Sangha thro. its President VERSUS State of Maharashtra & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Mr. Anand Jaiswal, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. V.A. Thakre, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. CORAM : D.D.SINHA AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATE : MARCH 28, 2008. Heard. Mr. Jaiswal, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that in the present writ petition the petitioner is seeking a simplicitor direction to respondent nos.2 and 3 to remove encroachment located on Nagpur – Chandrapur highway, particularly in front of Government Guest House. Mr. Thakre, the learned Assistant Government Pleader, states that the portion of the road alleged to have been encroached and the directions sought by the petitioner for removal of encroachment is the subject matter of Regular Civil Suit No.37/1999. It is further contended by the Assistant Government Pleader that there is another suit filed by the Union of India which has bearing on the issue. 2 Be that as it may. If there is no legal impediment or if the alleged encroachment in question is on the public road and is not connected with the subject matter of any of the suits, in that event, we expect respondent nos.2 and 3 to look into it. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE APTE