" p'% ^^n'''. i ;r5 ^i ¥{^ ^ ^r' ig¥^!lU!Jt ppiIP€JI?i c^ i^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT APPEAL N0. ^^ 12007 [ARISING OUT OF WMT PETITION N0. 4065/04] APPELLANT: J)al Singar, S/o Shri Inder Singar ,.•• PETITIONER ^\^7 Aged about 36 years, [Ex-Watman ^y,.-" ..^1^/' i;^ \^oc ^: ..^v^ ^yy yy ^ f of Block Wadrafnagar] R/o Wadrafnagar Distt. Surguja Chhattisgarh. VERSUS ^ RESPONDENTS:! a State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretaiy, General Administration Department D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur [C.G.] 2. Collector, Surguja Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja [C.G.] .3. Block Development officer Block Wadrafnagar Distt. Surguja Chhattisgarh ^^p^ WRIT APPEAL UNDER .^Je d^c^Q) T^ H^ Cow^ H!©NCOURT OF GHHATTtSQARH : BtLASPUJ% DJytsionBench Coram: Hon'ble Shri H.L. Dattu, CJ & Hon'ble Shri V.K. Shrivasteva, J WRIT APPiALNO,220F2©07 APPgLLANT Versvs RiSPONDENTS Dal Singar The Stat®of Chhsrttis^irh and others. Present: Shri J.K. Shastri, counsel for tie appellant. Shri N.K. Agrawal, Dy. Advocate ©eneralforth&State/ respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on 23rd February, 2097) The following oral order of the Court was passed by H.L. Dattu, G.J. Sometime in the year 1987 appellant was appoir^ed as a part-time Sweeper in the respondent csstablishment. in the year 1989 he was appointed again on a temporary basis as a watchnffian. It is stated in the memo of appeal that in the y^ir 1994 he was paicl regutar pay scale. Respondents had terminated the servic€©ofttie petitioner by order dated 31/OSQOOO. 2) Aggrieved by the said order, petitioner was before this Court in Writ Petition No.4065/2004. The learned single Judg®of this Court had rejected the writ petitlon applying the princjptes lajd dcwm by the Apex Court in the case of UmaDevL -———— — ^ o ^ {^ We have carefully peruseel ftie judgment renderod by iearned slngte Judge of this Court. In our view the judgment is In consonance with the law dectared by the Apex Court in ie case of Uma Devi. Therefore, interference with taw taidl down by leameit single Judge of this Court is not catled for. Accordlngly, thte appeat requires to be rejected and accordingiy it is rejected. _ .^—-^_ Ordered accordingly. ^ Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge '€\