HI6H COURT OF CT1HATTTSSARH AT BILASWR W.P. (S) No. 1964 of 2007 Versus Abrdiam Kerketta, son of Shri Paulus Kerketto, aged obout 47 years, wortdng as Assistait Teohcer, beportment of Tribol, ©overnmerrt Primary School Batnidond, R/o. Kunkuri, Tch. Kunkuri. Distt. Jashpur (C.©.) (St. No. 119 of the Impuguned Order P-15 1. State of Chhattisgarh, throigh the Secretary, bepffl-tment of Tribal, &au Kalyan 5ingh Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.) 2. The Assistant Commissioner', Oepartment of Tribal, Jcshpur (c.e.) 3. Block Education Officer, Block KurAuri, Distt. Jishpur (C.6.) K Present; Mr. Hcr'ish Khurrtiya, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panet L<u»yerfor Stote/respondents. OR&ER (Passed on this 2nd t)ay of Aprjl, 2007) 1. The question of law involved herein ceto whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from the date of compietion of probation period. 2. Learned counsel appearit^ for the petitioner <s well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved the (wesent writ petition we the same as to that of in W.P. (5) No. 4725/2006 (Amar Sai Ram & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh <& others), which was disposed of vide or-der dorted 1.9.2006.1 ~~~~~~-^ 3. In view of -ttie above-stoted sdamissions rhade by teamed counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in the sane terms. No order as to costs. C.. - : Sd/- K,;' ' SatishK.AgniIiotri , Judge i.L ^ StAhash p—"