A tUtZCfTMIIOB NOo^&SO OIF 2083 ^ff0\- t>»IIIOHB« ./•s"^51-' ^"^A^'^-y ^^'_^f^~ ..^•" ^^" *»v tteo Stng^t QandEa,, sen pf Stert .tgii Bait6aue..t3aaiaara..aged ai6oat.:^'39 years, .-sdiSBeieatly woeiElgB as SaaEjpaaeto, Stam pan<a>aya* »Bl)Bjaiyia»B©8't-«»t4,ja.tpi,K,,. B.tstE.tet-aanJg.ir-^a^a, (e.®.) V K R ^ P§ -*. I. StStc of cbbattlsgarte, thre»»s^ &®<aaetary» ; ' t e£ ipaastaa-yat aaa |B8^|i®«velp^ienfc.:&3E»S.Btaa»raa Han^aIay.Raipar. (C.e.} f 2. ;Tl».<%llec*Br',.^<|a.jB,.jg.lE»eba^>a» Wstrle^-3&&)ySx <%ft^a^<e.,s.^ °N:,."sSSfc'B wl3S3tei^l,;OiE£awr;-(Bfiv»h-»'?: ^-^^^ltjl.^Eastsl^-'SSnjgijp'ias^^s EUstrlet ^aBJ^dr-<ata^a»<C.e.} VKS >:'2S6ii .•B«iBR3»RTt€®ES:':2S6/227:-;e».'ra|t WSSSSXVS3Si»::SS XI-HC-22 sn^t^i R-ii.* siilsi ?t»+lich W •<.\ '3^ •^t'tll<'l*l, aAo'is, RiCTi'ay sn^yr IR^? L>3.^:>,2-S30/ ':""%T:I. 2fl0'^ HIHCTI tbllcb I^^T' 31I^T'S'RIIW ^lfBff thte 12.09.2003 HeardShri Sonjay bubey, The petitioner has 226/227 of the Constitution of issuance of show cause notiGe (Ai the Sub Divjsional Officer (Revenu^J Facts leading to'filing of is an elected Sarpdnch of 6ram F( Bharatiya Jana'ha Part/. The sajd 6ram Pdnchayat since last 3^- of the'vilkigers ofi©ramPanchayijit Chieft Mjnister allegjng that"the.? riotice to him for demoli+ion of which has beeh unauthorizeclly o4 Colleetor, Janjgir-Champa Jaijdipur, who after conductin^ (Annexure P-2). Leela Ram has; Sovernment land that is why uctioi') false complaint and.allegations Gollector, Janjgir-Champa; issued before him on 08.08.2003 and witH to refund ftsA,000/- to. Leeta nrtexure <bl-i!?<rt^1'4^Itf^ ^ fc^ <Pfl+^l< '^siPaHSn^r cc^unsel for the petitioner. this writ petition under Articie 3|ndia, by which he has challenged the P-1) dated 13.08.2003 issued by j4),Sakti. writ petition are that the petitioner ]anchoyat,.Betadula, wliois related to pet^t-ioner is working as Sarpanch pf the lyears. Leeb Ram.Choinclrd who is one •.Bekidula, made a^complainfto the |5ram Piincbdyat hc^ -iltegally issued co^struction upon the :6overnmcnt land, (cupied by Leela Ram Chondra. The ferr|ed .the motter to the TeHsildar, the enquiry submitted a report jconstructed a hous& illegally on th? was taken cgainst Wfn and he madea ag^mst the petitioner. Thereafter, the |rnotioe to the petitioner to appear ou-l- hearing the petitiQrier, asked him Ifiam dnd osked not To pemove the ['ti^^' - r'-BH'iiwui.'U', '••"•"iWS^^SS'ss^ W-88-22? .^n^i'n fei:[i?3ii|sr 9)T:T ^n ^^ -^W\v\ii, :0Til<H<i®,(«ini«"i< SIT^OT 'ira^R ..MS>?iSS.Q^ _ - """ffl, 2003, W(Rtl thi-lish efeqCT" sii^i ^Biwater - 2.- possession of Leeta Ram. The Co|l make hissignature on a bkink^paper isajed notfce under Section 40 (1) Acihiniyam, 1993, (hereinafter removal of the petitioner from the and arbitrary. The leamed counsel for thel alle9ed incident, the TehsildaR has he reached The conclusion tha'< encroaehed upon the land ahd thai petitioner. Now again the Sub t>ij the petitioner on the sgme gr6und; ttiat he took the bribe bf Rs.4,000<j the same to the cdmplainant. The the Collector obtained the signatui being misused. t-fwing heard the learned regard to the factsand Oivisional Officer has issued show Section 40 (1) of the Adhiniyam, reply to the show causenotice ancl the mafter after taking into considj circumstdnces <*l<;i?l''il-1-1l^<'ilfl feA <fa«(lt / ^ sriwtan^i llector also forced the petitioner to Now. the Suh &ivisionoil Officer hois of the Chhdttisgarh Pcmchayat ftajya rejferred to as "the 'Adhiniyam') for postof thesSarpanch, which is illegal petitioner submits that in the a»id ^tlready conducted an inquiry in which complainant Leela Ram Chandra encr'oachment was removed by the (isional Officer has issued ndtice to (alleging that ttie petitjoner acimitted^ [- from the complainant and returned learnedceunsel further submits that ir^ on q blank paper and tiiot paper is colLinsel for -t+ie petitioner and having of the case, so far, the Sub (xuse notice to the petitioner ynder •j+ie petitioner is entitled to file his thereafter, the S.b.O. shall decide l^rotjon the reply and other material; XI-HC-22 sn^T'^T ^qniqn ^n^T ?t>4liGh ^ (1 '3^ 'qNiwi^ ®Ay''i6,&Hi's'i3i :^^k flmpiT ax-iw 3nft$T "q^g? SS^S^&L 200^ aii^g^aiWBft^ -2-1- cause notice, The peTition does nc chl-qltl^ :*3F^^ %*<3 <f<q-^R '^3il^!3I^r . in connection with this matter. If is not a case where the 5.0.0. is not entitled td issue notice under Se^t-ion 40 (1) of the Adftiniyamor he has no authority to issue the notice. ^n the circumstances, againstthe shdw t lie and the same is devoid of merit. Accordjn9ly, the petition isdismis^d. Consequently, M.(W.)P.No.^89/2003 &. I.A.No.8481/2003 stand disposed of. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge