IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 24TH MARCH 2011 / 3RD CHAITHRA 1933 RP.No. 1122 of 2009(N) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ IN OP.23023/1998 Dated 13/10/2006 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN WP(C) ----------------------------------------- MATHEW V.J., VETTUKATTIL HOUSE, IRUMPAKACHOLA P.O., KANJIRAPUZHA VIA, PALGHAT DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.GOPINATH RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. THE PERSONNEL MANAGER, CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION, WAREHOUSING BHAVAN, SIRI INSTITUTIONAL AREA, HAUZ KAUS, NEW DELHI. 2. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION, BANGALORE-27. 3. THE PERSONNEL MANAGER, REGIONAL OFFICE, CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION, BANGALORE-27. ADV. SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J. FOR R2 SMT.POOJA SURENDRAN FOR R2 SRI. B. RAMACHANDRAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= R.P. No. 1122 of 2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 24th day of March, 2011. O R D E R This review petition is filed by the petitioners in the writ petition alleging that the judgment in the writ petition has been passed relying on the judgment in O.P.No.1926/1998, which is produced along with the review petition, which has no connection with the issues involved in the writ petition. 2. Heard both sides. 3. I am satisfied that the judgment deserves to be recalled. Accordingly, the judgment dated 13-10-2006 in O.P. No. 23023/1998 is recalled. Post the original petition for hearing. The review petition is allowed as above. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.