^ w^^ ^«5f G) d^ ^^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRITPETITION (C) N0. UU3^ / 2010 PET1TIONER ^... ^^^" o^-" ^^ .^^^ •^^^ ^e^^ ^^' RESPONDENT Smt. Mohni Devi W/o. Shri Kartar Lal Mandhani, aged about 59 years, R/o. Bhatapara (Mata Devalaya), Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS ^,. : Municipal Corporation, Raipur, Through- it's Commissioner, District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA. \1«. o MIGN COUR^O^ GHMArTBQARM AT BILASPUR J, WRIT PETmON (CY N0.4431 ot 201® Petitioner Smt. Mohni Devi Versus ResDondent Munlcipal Corporation, Raipur. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE22e OF TH6 GONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon'Me Mr. Satish K. Agnihotrj, J.) N«NN)»a^«i«Ni«iimin»iilMNiN«i<miM«N«««niNl»»«»»«MNi««»^iil»iN*wwi»»Nn»lwi»^^i<««»iiiii»i^«WNi^iin«l»i|»i«»^ Present:- h4s. Nausina Afrin Ali, wtth Shri Saurabh Dangi, Advocates for the petitioner. Shri Pankaj Agrawat, Advocate for the respondent. 1. 1RtORALl (Passed on 12" day of Augyst, 2010) Learned counsel appearteig for the respendent Gorporatton submits that there is no TOntemptation for ctemolition of any structure, wWch is duly legal and authorised, in respect of the p^itioner, without affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petttioner. 2. Shri Agrawal further submits that no clemolition in respect of the property in dispute shall be done wlthout affording opportuntty ot hearing to the petitioner. 3. In view of foregoing, nothing remains in ttiis p^itton for adjudication. Accordingly, the pet'rtion is dlsmtesed wiUi the above- stated observation. 4. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Ashok