HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONERS WTUT PETITION ('S) No. 3431 of2Q 7 : 1. Ramesh Kumar Jurri Aged about 42 Years, S/o. Shri Dau Lal Jun-i Assistant Teacher, Primary School Navin Udkuda. 2. Ishwai- Lal Patel Aged about 47 Yeai-s, S/o. Milu Ram Patel Assistant Teacher, Middle SehoolJevra. 3. Devanand Sori Aged about 47 Years, S/o. Shri Bhutnath Sori, Assistant Teacher, Primary School Kotela. 4. Komal Ram Jain, Aged about 40 Years, S/o. Slm Hirau Ram Jain Assistant Teaeher, Pfimary School Kumharpara, Bagdongri. All are at Block Charama, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) VERSVS • : 1; State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Educatioa Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Tlie Directoi- Public Instmction Department Raipur(C.G.) 3. Disti-ict Edueation Qfficer Kanker District Kariker(C.G.) 4. Block Education QfiGcer Charaina Distt. Kanker(C.G.) 5. Treasury & Funds Departinetit Kanker (C.G.) WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OFINDIA Single Bench : Hon'ble Justjice Shri Satish K. Agmhotri. Present: Shri D.N.Prajapati, Advocate for the petitioners. Sliri An-ind Dubey, Panel Lawyer forthe State/respondents. KESPONDENTS (^ (Passedon22ridayof June, 2007) The question of law involved herein is asto whether fhe petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.fthe date ofinitial appointment or from the date ofcompletion ofprobation period. Leamed counsel appearing for fhe petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jomtly submit that the facts and question oflaw involved ^, m the present writ petition are the same as to that of in W.P.(S) No. 5976/2006 <SushM Tiwari and othere Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh & Others), which was allowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. In view ofthe above-stated submissions made by leamed counsel for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge