ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 2257 OF 1995 PETITION NO. 2257 OF 1995 PETITION NO. 2257 OF 1995 Mr.Arvind Ravaji Doshi Age-55 yrs., Occu.Landlord, R/o. 437, West Mangalwar Peth, At & Post- Solapur, Dist. Solapur. ...Petitioner (Orig.Plaintiff) Vs. Mr.B.K.Jakkal, (Since deceased through his Legal Heirs & representatives) 1. Smt.Nirabai Bhalchandra Jakkal, Since deceased through her legal heir & representative: Mr.Anup Balasaheb Jakkal, Age- Adult, Occu.-Business, R/o, 165-C, Railway Lines, Solapur, Dist. Solapur. 2. Dr.G.N.Kango, Age 58 years., Occu.- Doctor, R/o. 165-C, Railway Lines, Solapur, Dist. Solapur. ... Respondents. None for the Petitioner. Mr. T.D.Deshmukh for Respondent No.2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 14th October, 2008. : 14th October, 2008. : 14th October, 2008. JUDGMENT:- JUDGMENT:- JUDGMENT:- . None for the Petitioner. The learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.2 who was sub-tenant of the premises in question. The Petitioner’s-landlord’s ( 2 ) case revolved around the sub-tenancy of these three rooms. As per affidavit dated 9th February, 1996, the possession of the said three rooms have been given to the Petitioner-Landlord directly. There is acknowledgement on record to show that Respondent No.2 vacated the said premises and handed over the same, even otherwise the suit was dismissed and also both the courts below are passed the order against the sub-tenant as well as original tenant on the ground of sub-tenancy. In view of this affidavit, therefore, there is no point in keeping this matter pending. 2. The Petition is, therefore, disposed of as the matter is settled out of the Court and as the suit premises is also vacated. [ ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.]