1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 17 OF 1997 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 513 OF 1995 K.R. Vallecha ...Plaintiff. Vs. Seema Ramesh Vallecha Ashok Valecha & Ors. ...Defendants. Ms. Gauri Godse for the Plaintiff. Ms. Kavita A. Shah for the Defendants. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 24th November, 2009. P.C.- 1 In a probate Petition of the last Will and Testament of Rameshkumar Rewachand Valechha, the Petitioner/Plaintiff and Caveator/Defendant and added defendant Nos. 2 and 3, having interest in the property, have arrived at settlement and accordingly signed the consent terms dated 24/11/2009. It is counter signed by the respective advocates also. The consent terms is marked as “X” for identification, and taken on record. There is no objection, if any, including signature or identification of the parties. The statement is 2 made that the consent terms is well within the framework of law and the record and this is with intention to settle the matter for all the purposes and therefore, Defendant Nos. 2 and 3 are brought on record and made party to the present consent terms. It is permitted. The Plaintiffs to carry out the amendment forthwith. 2 Plaintiff No.3, for himself and power of attorney holder of all the plaintiffs and all the three defendants are present in the Court. The parties have already accepted the undertakings given in clause 3 and 4 of the consent terms. This undertaking is accordingly accepted. 3 In view of above, order dated 12/06/1996, stands vacated. 4 The Demand Draft as referred in paragraph No.5 is also handed over to Defendant No.3. 5 In the interest of justice, therefore, the present suit, as well as, the Petition are disposed of, in view of the consent terms. No costs. 6 The refund of Court fee, if any, in accordance with law. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)