IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-28561 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 19.9.2011 Karan Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present: Mr.Naveen Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, no ground is made out to interfere in view of the fact that the revisional court has remitted the matter back to the learned trial Court to pass a fresh order. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that a specific order has not been passed by the revisional court to set aside the order of the learned trial Court. On due consideration I am of the opinion that the grievance of the petitioner is unfounded as the order passed by the revisional court has the intent of setting aside the impugned order. The very fact that it is directed that the matter be decided afresh indicates that the learned trial Court is required to pass a fresh order in accordance with law. Dismissed. 19.9.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss