( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2784 OF 2010 Atul Krishnaji Thakar .. Petitioner Age. 58 years, Occ. Business, R/o. Plot No. 27, N-1, CIDCO, Aurangabad, Dist. Aurangabad. Versus City and Industrial Development .. Respondent Corporation of Maharashtra, Through its Administrator, Udyog Bhavan, New Aurangabad. Mr. S.S. Gangakhedkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Shinde h/f. Mr. A.S. Bajaj, Advocate for the respondents. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 08.10.2010 ORAL JUDGMENT [ PER – B.R. GAVAI,J.] :- 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard by consent. 2. The facts in the present case are almost identical ( 2 ) with the facts in Writ Petition No. 5116 of 2010. We have allowed the said writ petition. In that view of the matter, we also allow the present writ petition. We direct the respondent – CIDCO to grant no objection for occupancy/Completion Certificate for the construction made by the petitioner, if the said construction is in accordance with the relevant building regulations, by-laws and other provisions of law, within a period of four weeks from today. It is further made clear that the petitioner shall pay necessary penal/additional premium as per the policy of the respondent - CIDCO. 3. Rule is made absolute in aforesaid terms. The petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. [A.A. SAYED,J.] [B.R. GAVAI,J.] snk/2010/OCT10/wp2784.10