^ PETITIONER IN THE HON*BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR VR1T PETITION N0» ^J ^ /2Q05 s~ ^ SanJQy Kumar Sahu son of Madan Lal Sanu, aged aboufc 27 years, resident ofi village Kodasar, Tah, Takhatpur, Districfc BilQSpur (C»G<|}. VSRSUS RE3PONDENTS (- ^ lo State of chhatttsgarh ^ Through- Secretary, >.j^' Deparfcment of Panchayat & Rural ^ /I^ J^ Developrpenfc Department, D^K<^S<| M . ^w/ .^y/ ^'^•kl.-z../ ^w/ ^/'.^•wv 'y^\p / ^^y^ ^/y ^ Bhavan, Raipur (C<.G^)» ( 2<» The Gram Pandh.aya^ Thakur Kapa, Tah* Takhatpur, Distt* Bilaspur^ /3* Raghunath Ram Saha son of Faguram Sahu, aged about 34 years, R/O* Village Kodasar^ Tah* Takhatpar, District Bil aspur (C <, G„ ) ^ ^.^_^ETITION,UNDERJtRTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION_OF INDIA XI-HC-22 3Tl^TW RpTT^CT^T ^TO^cT 0<\^ V/ ^E? ^ii4ld^, ^tftwK?, R«m'yy WWtI (hN ^T^r^r? A<.^:'..31&.s ^h fire%' ^ 200 '5 .3iTI^T^<nW«^<T 08.08.2005 Shri M.K. Bhaduri> coux»^< Shri Vivek Sharma, Paal&l copy. Heard on admission. This writ petition has b^en resolution of the Graxa Paiicl|ayat leanifcd proc^ss P/2). Learaed counsel for aforesaid resolutioii, fhe nax4< consMercd for appointment t^ Panchayat Accorduig to are various deformities ioi the respondent No, 3 caiuiot be apj Paachayat It appeare that the present rcspondent No, 3 hjas In fhe facts aad circums prcmature. I am not mclmed same is dismissed at motioi petitioner to avail appropriate rj fhe decision taken by fhie con<| appoiatment of respondent aggrieved by fhe saM Wifh the above disposed of. <hWld4lH Nl^dTfffe^ <Rl«i< ^3lNTT3T1^T el for the petitioner. Lawyer for the State on actvance fited, challeaguag tfae mipu^iied dated 31.06.2005 (Amiexure- fhje petitioner subxmts that by tibe of rcspondent No. 3 has been 1±ie post of Panchayat Kamai by coxiiisel for fhe petitioner^fhere aforesaid resolution. He submifs that boiated on fhe basis ofresolution of of appomtment is going on, fhe i4>t been appoiiited oa tiie said post |tances of fhe case, fhe petitioii is Iko entertaia lids writ petitfe>n< The sfage. It shaU be o^n to fhe c^medy availabte uBder tlie law after ^er^ed aufhoiity iii rclatk>n to fhe fo. 3, if the petitiaaer shaU be appointm^nt obserya(tions, fhe petition stands finally _._.^t-_————^• —- Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge