THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO.184 OF 2010 23RD March 2010. Between: SADINENI KAVITHA .. APPELLANT AND THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE AND OTHERS .. RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO.184 OF 2010 O R D E R: (Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Nisar Ahmad Kakru) After arguing at some length the learned counsel for the appellant sought withdrawal of the writ appeal on the ground that the appellant belongs to a class of have-not and would advice her to try her luck before the competent authority for reconsideration of the matter. In view of the statement so made we are absolved of examining the judgment impugned and leave the appellant free to approach the competent authority for redressal of her grievance. Should the appellant choose to file the representation/application/petition it shall be considered. Disposed of. SANJAY KUMAR, J. NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, C.J. 23RD March, 2010. Nagesh Babu THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO.184 OF 2010 O R D E R: (Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Nisar Ahmad Kakru) 23RD March 2010.