IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH, TWO THOUSAND AND TEN Present: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY A.S.Nos.1296 & 2527 OF 1999 A.S.No.1296 of 1999 Between: Mandal Revenue Officer, Golugonda. … Appellant And: Pyla Ammanna and others … Respondents A N D A.S.No.2527 of 1999 Mandal Revenue Officer, Golugonda. … Appellant And: Pothala Musili and others … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY A.S.Nos.1296 & 2527 OF 1999 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A.Gopal Reddy) These two appeals, under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894, by the Land Acquisition Officer-cum-Mandal Revenue Officer, Golugonda, are directed against the common order dated 13-09-1996 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Chodavaram in O.P.Nos.434 and 433 of 1988 respectively, whereby the learned Subordinate Judge fixed the market value of the acquired land at Rs.24,200/- per acre as against Rs.4,040/- awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer and Rs.1,000/- for the thatched shed as against Rs.300/- awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. 2. Along with O.P.Nos.434 and 433 of 1988, the learned Subordinate Judge also disposed of O.P.No.435 of 1988. As against O.P.No.435 of 1988, the Land Acquisition Officer preferred A.S.No.1257 of 1999 and this Court, by order dated 24- 12-2008, while dismissing A.S.No.1257 of 1999 confirmed the fixation of market value of the acquired land by the reference Court at Rs.24,200/- per acre and also Rs.1,000/- for thatched shed. 3. Following the same and for the reasons mentioned therein, this appeal is also dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J ____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J Dated 30th day of March 2010 Lrkm.