IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12061 of 2009 1. SANGEETA SINGH, wife of Munna Singh @ Bimlendu Sharan Singh 2. Munna Singh @ Bimlendu Sharan Singh, son of Govind Sharan Singh, Both residents of Mohalla-Goshala, P.S.-Katihar, District-Katihar-------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 21.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that deceased went to the house of the petitioners and it is natural that he will be provided something to eat or drink which is common courtesy. Mango and milk were served to him. There is chance of providing of poison but at the same time there is chance of consuming of the poison by the deceased himself finding the marriage not of his choice. Petitioner no.1 is alleged for having some relation with one Anil Jha and it is said that it was known to the deceased but on the relevant day there was no occasion for exposure of the differences. If that was the fact, petitioner no.2 will never accompany him. Similar suspicion rather a case of abetment is made also against the informant himself as he settled his son’s marriage against his will but, in any case, petitioners arrest at the moment cannot be justified. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Katihar P.S. case no.249 of 2006, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-( Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar , - 2 - subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )