IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 25TH MAY 2007 / 4TH JYAISHTA 1929 WP(C).No. 13202 of 2007(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ ROY MATHEW, S/O.MATHEW, PARAVAMPARAMBA, (PO) VELLAD, ALAKKODE, TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.V.C.JAMES RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, R.T.A., KANNUR. 2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/05/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.13202 of 2007 ------------------------------- Dated this the 25th May, 2007. J U D G M E N T The petitioner has filed Ext.P2 application before the second respondent for revision of his timings. The original timings were settled by Ext.P1, dated 5.6.2006. Petitioner's contention is that subsequent to Ext.P1, three more permits were issued, and, therefore, revision of his timings is necessitated. 2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as also the learned Government Pleader. The learned Government Pleader submits that Ext.P2 can be disposed of. 3. In the above circumstances, I direct the second respondent to consider Ext.P2, and take appropriate follow up action, after hearing all other parties who may be affected by the revision of timings of the petitioner. The same shall be done within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE nj.