IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.6517 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:23.02.2011 Gurjinder Singh Sethi . . .Petitioner Versus Yadvinder Singh . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Rahul Rampal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Paramjit Singh Saini, Advocate, for the respondent. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against order passed by the Rent Controller, Ludhiana dated 28.9.2010 dismissing the application of the petitioner without even issuing notice to the non-applicant. It was expected from the Rent Controller to have at least issued notice to the respondent to have his reply on record and then decide the application in accordance with law but the application has been dismissed only on the ground that the petitioner is trying to delay the proceedings despite the fact there is no opposition to the application as notice was not issued. In view thereof, the impugned order is set aside and matter is remanded back to the Rent Controller, Ludhiana to decide the application after issuing notice to the respondent. Rent Controller is further directed to decide the said application within one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) FEBRUARY 23, 2011 JUDGE Vivek