IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M-36242 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 20.1.2011 ... Sukhwant Singh ................Petitioner vs. State of Punjab .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Ms. Maninder Arora, Advocate for the petitioner Sh. S. S. Bhinder, Senior Additional Advocate General with Sh. Amandeep Singh Rai, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. ... K.C. Puri, J. As per allegation of the prosecution, Tehal Singh had physical relations with the prosecutrix and on that account there was pregnancy. The said pregnancy was stated to be aborted by the petitioner. In view of gravity of offence no ground for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. Consequently, the petition stands dismissed. ( K.C. Puri ) 20.1.2011 Judge chugh