IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.PADMANABHAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 23RD AUGUST 2007 / 1ST BHADRA 1929 CRP.No. 892 of 2002(A) ---------------------- LAR.33/1993 of SUB COURT, CHERTHALA .................... REVN. PETITIONER: RESPONDENT NO.1 --------------------------------- K.P.SREEDHARAN PILLAI,KANDATHIL VEEDU, AROOR P.O., CHERTHALA TALUK,ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. DR.P.S.KRISHNA PILLAI RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER AND RESPONDENT NO.2 & 3 ----------------------------------------------- 1. PADMAVATHY AMMA, THOPPIL HOUSE, AROOR VILLAGE. 2. PRABHAKARAN PILLAI,PUTHENPURACKAL,AROOR. 3. STATE OF KERALA. BY ADV. SRI.P.G.PARAMESWARA PANICKER SRI.P.GOPAL GOVT.PLEADER THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER IN C.M.P NO. 2284 OF 2002 IN C.R.P. NO. 892 OF 2002 DISMISSED 23.08.2007 SD/-K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, JUDGE K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------------------ C.R.P No. 892 of 2002 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23th day of August 2007 ORDER This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the 1st respondent, challenging an order passed by the Sub judge Cherthala in I.A. No. 630 of 2001 in LAR 33 of 1993 staying the trial of that L.A.R in view of the pendency of A.S. 616/1999 and LA.A. 849 /1997 before this Court and A.S. 66/1997 on the file of District Court Alappuzha, under Section 10 of the C.P.C. 2. An extent of 5.86 Ares of land comprised in Survey No.43/1 G & H of Aroor Village, Cherthala Taluk, Alappuzha District was acquired for development and expansion of National Highway 47. An award was passed by the Land Acquisition Officer on 8.1.1993. The petitioner (1st respondent in the I.A) is the claimant No.2 in the L.A.R No. 33/1993. There was dispute regarding the right to receive compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer in the acquisition proceedings. There was claim for enhancement of compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer also. The trial court stayed the trial of the L.A.R. till the disposal of A.S. 616/1999 and connected cases. Challenging that order this Civil Revision Petition is filed. 3. Today, I have dismissed A.S. No. 616/1999 and L.A.A. No. 849/1997. So the stay granted by the trial court in LAR 33/1993 stands vacated. So this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. K.PADMANABHAN NAIR,JUDGE es