IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 5537 of 2010 Date of decision: February 15, 2011 Som Nath @ Som Parkash .. Petitioner Vs. M/s Luxmi Trading Company .. Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Karan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N. Jindal, J (Oral) The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the order dated 11.8.2010 (Annexure P3) passed by the trial court dismissing the application for adducing additional evidence. The case was fixed for the evidence of the petitioner- defendant (herein referred as, 'the petitioner') on 11.6.2009. He never deposited diet money to examine Naresh Kumar and ultimately his evidence was closed on 6.2.2010. Now he has sought for examining Naresh Kumar by way of additional evidence. There is no reason that despite due diligence, he could not examine him as the plaintiff disclosed in his statement long back that the entries were either scribed by Parveen Kumar or by Naresh Kumar. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. February 15, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge