IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 303 of 1997 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- MUKUL MANHARLAL CHOKSHI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR DD VYAS SR.COUNSEL for the Petitioner MR SN SHELAT, AG with MR AJ DESAI, AGP for Respondent No. 1-2 MR PRANAV G DESAI, Advocate for Respondent No. 3 MR AJ PATEL, Advocate for Respondent No. 4 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Date of decision: 12/11/2003 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI) The learned Advocate General states that the possession of the disputed land of the respondent no. 4 has now been regularized, since the land in question has been granted to the respondent no. 4. In this view of the matter, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners states that the petitioners at this stage do not press for this petition. The petition stands rejected as not pressed. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Interim relief stands vacated. [R.K. ABICHANDANI, J.] [D.A. MEHTA, J.] pirzada/-