Ijli ^' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 4197 OF 2008 P.C. Dubey, aged about SSyears, S/o Late Shri Ram Chandra Dubey, presently posted as Deputy Forest Ranger, Sub Forest Range, Khbdsara Belgahna Range, Forest Division Marwahi, Djstrict Silaspur. 2. 3. State of Chhattisaarh. through the Secretary, GQvernment of Chhattisgarh, Department of Forest, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur.Chhattisgarh. The Deputy Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, DepartmenS of Forest, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4. The Consen/ator of Foresf, Bilaspur (CG). The Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division Marwahi, District Bilaspur, 5. (Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: ShriVinayPandey.cdunsetforthepetitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, Dy. Advocate General With Smt.Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyerforthe State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this1 dayof August, 2008) With the consent of learned counse! appearing for the parties, the etitionis heard finally. 2) Learned counsei appearing for the peUtioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press this petiiion on merits, at this stage,? However, the petitioner prays that the representation dated 20-7-2008 (Annexure-P/4) pending before the concerned authorities may be directed to be considered and decided, in accordance w'th, law, within the presGribed time. 3) Shri Thakur, leamed Dy. AdvocateGeneral appearing fortheState, lubmitsthat there is no reason why the pending representation should not be decided by the concerned aufhority, expeditiously. ^- u.owri 4) In yiew ofthe foregding, the petition is disposed ofwith a direction to the concemed authorities to consider and decide the representation as stated above, in accordance with law, on its own merits, as eariy as possibie, preferabiy within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of thls order. Shri Thakur further submite fhat no coercive steps shatlbetaken ggainstthe petitioner, tiilthedisposaLQfthe representation. 5) ! hope and frust that the State Government shati examine the representation objectivelyin accordance with law and guidellnes, Issued by theGovernri'ienttimetotime. 6) Consequently, application (I.A.NQ.1/2008) for grantof interim relief also stands disposed of. —^—____ , ?tish^Agniji^ ^)—-—:- ^ .