*- •-•'••^.•~' r.P. <n;-''"^ ry\-€^ \9S^ \Q--' .y't' ^yy :./" SI^Kt^ ©i&^'i1 ^ •^Smt. Sushma Bhaiavi {Noy/ years, (Science), Govt. Hr. Sec. Schooi- 1/ Stai Education D.K.S. Raipur (C.G.) 2< Director 3. Shawan, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) e WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THI gi ;3 1^_-->- HZ6H CCMtT W CHHATTISSARH AT BILAS'UR No. 951 of 2(M)7 Respondents Smt. Sushraa Bhaiavi (Now Pradhan) 5tate of Oihati-feqarh and others SB; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Pre^nt: Mr. Anil Singh ftfljpur, Adyoaxte for ihe petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Pane! iawryer for the respondents/State. ORDER (Passed on tiiis 20th E^y of February, 2007) 1. TTie petitiorier was appointed vida order doted 15.12.88 (Annexure P/l) as Assistant Teacher on fixed pay scate of Rs. 300/-. After cofflptetion of one year probation, ^ne granted regu!ar< pay. 2. Leamed counse! appear-ing for the petitioner aibmits that the issue involved in the is asto whether the petitioner 'ss entitted to iguiar pay scale w.e.f. tiie date of initial or aner compietion of probation per-iod. 3. Tne issue. mvoSved, herein was considered by the Madhya PraAsh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A, No. 2745/89 hukffli* Yadu ond 56 o1+iers Vs. State of M.P. & others), wherein it was he!d that the simiiarly situated teachers are entitled to reguSar poy scate w.e.f. •t'ne date of initiai oppointment. The matter taken-up to *he Hon'bie Suprerae Court in SpeciaJ Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93. The said petition was by 1+ie Hon'bi'e Supreme Court uphoiding ihe decision of the Tribunai to the effect ihat the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitted to regular pay scale from date of initial aooointment. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submits that this Court, whife considering the same issue in Sushi! Tiwari & others Vs. State Sovt. of Chhaftisgarh & others (W.P. (5) No. 5976 of 2006) by orde" dated 7-11-20<}6, hcs graited reguter pay scate w.e,f. the date of initial apoointment. Learned coun®!appearing for the parties jointiy submit that this case is covered by fne decision of this Court in the case of SuAiI Tiwari & ottiers Vs. State Govt. of Gihatt'isgarh &. otiiers (Supro). 6. In view of that, tiiis petition is allowred in the sanie terms.No orcfer as to costs. Sabiu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge