1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 479 OF 2009 Salama Aslam Memon. ..Applicant. Vs. Abdul Satar Khalique Qureshi and ors. ..Respondents Mr.N. V. Bandiwadekar i/by S. C. Prabhu for the Applicant. Mr.H. S. Anand i/by Ms. Savita Donde for the Respondents. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 16th Sept.2009. PC: 1. This is a civil revision application filed by the original respondent. Main application was filed by the present respondents who are owners against the present applicant on the footing that the applicant was allotted the premises on leave and licence basis for a period of 11 months from 18.5.2005 to 17.4.2006. On this footing the decree 2 for eviction has been passed and confirmed in revision. The contention raised on behalf of the applicant is that during the subsistence of this agreement there was an oral agreement for sale and the suit was filed by the applicant for specific performance of the oral agreement of sale said to have been entered into on 24.6.2006. To my mind, the alleged oral agreement is entirely a separate issue. Since no other point is raised, there is no cause for interference in the impugned order. It is only clarified that the impugned order will not be executed while there subsists a restrictive order against taking of possession passed in the suit filed by the present applicant, being Suit No. 335/2008. Civil Revision Application is disposed off in the aforesaid terms. (R.S. MOHITE, J.)