IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 5973 of 2008 Between: V. Venugopalam S/o.Seetaramaiah (Late) Guduru (Now on leave) Nellore District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Additional Registrar-I (Services) O/o. The Commissioner for Cooperation and Registrar of Cooperative Societies, A.P. Gruhakalpa Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Collector and District Magistrate, Nellore. 3 The District Cooperative Officer,Nellore Opp. Sunder Lodge, Near R.T.C. Depot, Nellore. 4 The Divisional Cooperative Officer, Kavali, Cooperative Colony,. Kavali, Nellore District. 5 Jaladanki Primary Agricultural Coop. Society, Rep. by its President, Jaladanki Village and Mandal, Nellore District. 6 The District Coop. Audit/Enquiry Officer Nellore. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings in Rc No. 1619/2006/C dt. 14-11-2006 of the 4th Respondent as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.L.RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 5973 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner assails the proceedings, dated 16.02.2008, whereunder he was required to attend the disciplinary proceedings initiated against him, under Rule 20 of the A.P. Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1991. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Co-operation and the learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.5 Admittedly, the petitioner is a Government Civil Servant and in relation to an order of suspension passed against him, he approached the A.P. Administrative Tribunal by filing O.A.No.7306 of 2006. It was allowed, setting aside the order of suspension, pending enquiry against the petitioner. The present proceedings are in continuation of the same charges. Hence, this Court does not have the jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue his remedies in the A.P. Administrative Tribunal. There shall be no order as to costs. ________ 19.03.2008 JSU ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VSMI} THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 5973 of 2008 Date: 19.03.2008 JSU