-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 15 OF 2008 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 72 OF 2008 Narayan S Pawar ).. Petitioner Versus United India Insurance Co. Ltd. And others ).. Respondents Mr M B Kotak for the Petitioner. None present for the Respondents. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 20TH FEBRUARY 2009 P.C. We have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner. 2. Public Interest Litigation No.72 of 2008 filed by the Petitioner was dismissed by us vide our Order dated 31st July 2008 stating that this question can hardly be raised in a Public Interest Litigation and individuals were at liberty to take action in accordance with law. Review Petition has been filed for recalling the said order and entertaining the Public Interest Litigation. The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, while relying upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of People' s Union for Democratic Rights and others vs Union of India -2- and others, (1982) 3 SCC 235, contends that this Petition is filed in Public Interest on behalf of the Bar and such a cause should be entertained as large number of litigants, particularly minors, are likely to be affected. 3. We hardly find any merit. Firstly, this Petition is not covered under the provisions of Order 47 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code. This Court has taken a particular view and if the Petitioner feels that the said view is not correct, he is obviously at liberty to challenge the same in accordance with law. Furthermore, we may also notice that on question of law raised in the present Petition, two Writ Petitions are admitted by the Court and whatever principal of law is stated by the Court in those cases would have to be followed by the Court concerned in the State of Maharashtra. 4. We see no reason to review our order. Hence, Review Petition dismissed. No order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE A.P. DESHPANDE, J.