HIGHCOURT OELCHHAmSGARH, BILASPUR Writ Peti.tion (8) No. 4456^2007 RESPONDENT Gourishaaker SliuJda, S/o Shri Chaadramauli Shukla, aged about 45 years, Occupation Service, as a P.T. Teacher at Shahid Smarak Higher Secondary School, Municipal Corporation Raipur (C.G) R/o H.No.212 Samata Colony, Raipur ((C.G) Veisus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, ffarough fhe Secretary, Nagriya Prasliashaa and Vikas Mautralaya, Raipur Distt. Raipur(C.G). 2. Comiuissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur (C.G) WRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIOH OF INDIA Shri Surul Sahii, counsel for the petitioner Shri Ajay Dwivedi, P.L. for fhe State/respondents on advance copy. QRALORDER 102.08.2007) ,J. Heard. Referring to the Document Aunexure P-5, whicb is the memo of appeal, leamed counsel for fhe petitioner submits that a departmental appeal has ..been preferred before the respondent no.l prior to 01.2.2003 but the same has not been disposed of tiU date. Leamed counsel for the petitioner inakes a lunited prayer to dispose of fhis petition wifh a direction to respondent no.l to dispose of the said appeal within fhe stipulated period graated by this Gourt. This liaiited prayer niade by counsel for fhe petitioner is not opposed by coiinsel for the State. W. P.+ (81 No. 4436/2007 In the result, prayer is allowed. It is directed fhat if fhe appeal filed by fhe petitioner vide Annexure P-5 has not been disposed of so far, that shaU be decided by respondent no. l wittun a period of 3 nionths froin fhe date of receipt/production of a copy of this order alongwith a copy ofwrit petition filed before fhis Court. This petition is disposedof with^ the aforesaid directioas. Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Rao