IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR [CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9155/08 IN L.P.A.ST.19104/08 IN W.P.4562/07] [City of Nagpur Corporation & anor ..vs.. Jamil Ahmedkhan & ors] ================================== Mr. C.S. Kaptan, Advocate for applicant Counsel for respondent no.1 present Mrs.Dangre, Advocate for respondents no.2 & 3 ================================== CORAM: D.K. DESHMUKH & P.B. VARALE,JJ. DATE: 10TH DECEMBER, 2008. Heard learned counsel for both the sides. In the absence of any affidavit in reply, accepting averments in the application at face value, application granted in terms of paragraph 7 of the application . Application stands disposed of. L.P.A. Stamp No.19104/08: Admit. Heard finally by consent of the parties. It is a common ground before us that what is contained in paragraph 4 & 5 of the order of the learned Single Judge which impugned in this petition was not the subject matter of the petition which was before the learned Single Judge. It is also a common ground that the directions which have been issued by the learned Single Judge were without there being any petition before learned Single Judge. It is also a common ground that considering the nature of the directions which appears to be general directions issued in public interest and the matter was not within the jurisdiction of the learned Single Judge. Therefore, by consent of parties, what is contained in paragraph 4 and 5 of the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 19.10.2007, impugned in this appeal, is set aside. Letters patent appeal stands disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE smp.