IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C. Rev.(T) No. 43 of 2008. Decided on: 28th October, 2010. State of Himachal Pradesh. …Petitioner. -Versus- Subhadra Sharma. …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For the respondent. : Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the respondent fairly submits that her client is not interested in employment, even after the directions issued by the erstwhile learned Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal. Consequently, the petition is closed. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge October 28, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?