IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.1684 of 2010 Between: Smt. B. Bharathi ... PETITIONER AND The Joint Collector, Khammam District and two others ... RESPONDENTS ORDER: Heard the learned counsel. 2. The writ petition is filed seeking a writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction on the part of the second respondent in not finalizing the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner in spite of the specific directions given by the first respondent on 28-10-2008 in Appeal No.D/495/2008 as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the second respondent to implement the directions of the first respondent dated 28-10-2008 in Appeal No.D/495/2008 and pass such other suitable orders. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner placed strong reliance on U.K. Narasimhulu v. Joint Collector, Kurnool District and others[1]. 4. Several facts had been narrated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. 5. It is stated that as against the said order an appeal was filed and the same was disposed of making an order of remand. 6. In the light of the decision aforesaid this court is of the considered opinion that the writ petition be disposed of directing the second respondent – the Sub-Collector, Palavancha, Khammam District to conduct and complete the enquiry in this regard within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till appropriate decision is taken in this regard let the writ petitioner be directed to distribute the essential commodities. 7. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ P.S. NARAYANA, J February 11, 2010. Note: Furnish CC by 15-02-2010. B/o.PN THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.1684 of 2010 February 11, 2010 Note: Furnish CC by 15-02-2010. B/o.PN [1] 2005 (2) ALT 429