IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.20153 of 2011 Date of Decision.01.11.2011 Kashmira Singh son of Sh. Hakam Singh and another .....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab through Home Secretary to Government of Punjab, Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Notice of motion. 2. At the asking of Court, Mr. Navdeep Sukhna, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of official respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner will supply four copies of writ petition to the counsel for State for proper communication of the order. 3. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala-respondent No.3 will look into the complaint of the petitioner (Annexure P-4) and if there is a case made out, he will secure such redress to him as the law provides. 4. The writ petition is disposed of. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE November 01, 2011 Pankaj*