1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5363 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL ST.NO. 9208 OF 2010 United India Insurance Co.Ltd.,Aurangabad ...Applicant VERSUS Tehara Begum Sk. Rafiq and ors. ...Respondents ..... Shri P.C.Mayure, advocate holding for Shri S.G.Chapalgaonkar, advocate for the applicant Shri S.S.Kazi, advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2 Respondent nos. 3 and 4 absent, although served ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. DATED : 10 th February, 2011 PER COURT : 1 Heard respective learned counsel for the parties. 2 This is an application preferred by the applicant/appellant (original respondent no.1) for condonation of delay of 105 days caused in filing accompanying First Appeal. 2 3 Learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2 opposed the present appeal vehemently. 4 For the reasons stated in the present application, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily. It also appears that the said delay is not willful, deliberate and intentional, and hence, same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 5 In the result, present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ and delay of 105 days caused in filing accompanying Appeal stands condoned and accompanying First Appeal be registered and numbered and present application stands disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) dbm/ca5363.10