IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22106 of 2010 1. SEIKH EZAZUL @ SHEIKH EZAZUL HAQUE, S/O LATE SK. HASAN, 2. SEIKH ABID RAZA, S/O SHEIKH EZAZUL HAQUE. 3. SHEIKH FIROZ S/O SHEIKH BHOLA, ALL R/O VILLAGE- PADMAUL, P.S.MAINATAND, DISTRICT-WEST CHAMPARAN. --PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --OPP.PARTY 3 22.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Sanjay Kumar no.7, for the informant. The three petitioners are named accused in this case, carry allegation of stopping the informant from ploughing his common field and also assaulting and abusing naming caste. There is no injury report in support of allegation of assault and as regards the offence against Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The case appears squarely covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Gorige Pentaiah V. State of Andhra Pradesh; (2008) 12 SCC 531. Hence, in the facts and circumstances, the petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four 2 weeks from today, are directed to be enlarged on bail on each of them furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran, in Mainatand P.S. Case no. 23 of 2010, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, with additional condition that the petitioners shall remain present before the court below on each and every date for one year or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier. If the petitioners fail to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad