IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1585 of 2010 VIKRAM KUMAR . Versus STATE OF BIHAR. ----------- 05 28.03.2011 Heard both sides. Petitioner is declared juvenile in conflict with law. He is facing charge punishable under Section 302/34 of the Penal Code. Admittedly he is not named in the F.I.R. It is alleged that several weeks after the occurrence and retrieval of the dead body he was arrested on suspicion whereafter he said to have made a confessional statement. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 03.11.2009. It is further submitted that father of the petitioner is ready and willing to take responsibilities respecting the petitioner in case he is released on bail. A report from the concerned Probation Officer was called for which is available on record at Flag-P. Perused the report. Probation officer has recommended his release based on facts collected by him but subject to his supervision. Having regard to the period of incarceration and the report, this Court while setting aside the appellate order passed by the Court below directs for his release. Let petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of the Juvenile Justice Board, Munger in connection with G.R. No. 1689 of 2009, arising out of Kharagpur P.S. case no. 180 of 2009, subject to the following conditions:- (1) One of the bailors shall be the father of the petitioner. (2) It shall be the duty of the father to produce the petitioner before the Court as and when personal attendance is required. The father shall also produce the petitioner before the concerned Probation Officer at least once in a month for a period of 06 months from the date of his release providing an opportunity to the Probation Officer to gauge his conduct and behaviour. In case of default in such appearance, the Probation Officer shall immediately communicate the same to the Court in seisin of the matter whereafter his bail bond shall be cancelled. (3) During subsistency of the present privilege, if it is found that petitioner has involved himself in 3 any criminal case, the same shall be treated as a breach of the condition of bail entailing cancellation. Sym (Kishore K.Mandal, J.)