1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39274 of 2011 1. Niraj Giri @ Niraj Kumar Giri 2. Dhiraj Giri @ Dhiraj Kumar Giri, Both S/o Late Satyadeo Giri R/o Village- Tenuath Mathiya, P.S. Dinara, District-Rohtas. --Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar --Opp.party For the Petitioners : Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra For the State : Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap APP 2 05.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners are named accused in this case with allegation of shooting at the informant in order to pressurize her to enter into compromise with earlier instituted Case in Dinara P.S. Case no. 198 of 2009. Submission is that in both the cases parties have entered into compromise. The compromise petition is on the record. If it is so, in the event of informant 2 appearing before the court below on due identification and supporting the compromise, and one of the bailers must be local public representative, the petitioners, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Bikramgamj, Rohtas in Dinara P.S. Case no. 217 of 2009, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that petitioners shall remain present before the court below till disposal of the case. In case of failure to remain present on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. AAhmad ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)