IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6962 of 2008 Most.Janki Devi, wife of Late Vimal Ram, resident of Village- Bakhri, Police Station-Sursand, Post Office, Bakhri, District-Sitamarhi ---------------- Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Accountant General,Birchand Patel Path, Bihar,Patna 3. The Assistant Deputy Director, Provident Fund,Bihar,Patna 4. The Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur 5. The Collector-cum- District Magistrate, Sitamarhi 6. The District Accounts Officer, Sitamarhi 7. The District Provident Fund Officer, Sitamarhi 8. The Block Development Officer, Parihar, Sitamarhi 9. The Treasury Officer, Sitamarhi ------------------ Respondents. ---------------------------------- 02 28-09-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner , Sri Neeraj Nandan, learned Govt. Pleader no.20, who appears on behalf of Respondent nos.1 and 3 to 9 and Sri L.P.K.Rajgrihar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent no.2/ Accountant General,Bihar,Patna. It was submitted by Sri Neeraj Nandan, learned Govt. Pleader no.20 that entire retiral dues was paid to the petitioner in the year 2008 itself and such fact has been stated in the counter affidavit, which is going to be filed in course of the day. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the statement made by learned counsel for the State. In view of the stand taken by the parties, there is no need to keep the matter further pending. The writ petition stands disposed of. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)