^ ^SLE BSitfej CT^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE mGH COURT OP CHHATnSGARH ATBILASPUR (C><i.l WRIT PETITIOM N0. ^&^ /2006 PETITIONER ^t» .^rv.^' ^•••''iCfff-''" ..^ ^^^'^ >u^y..^ ^\<7-'1--.-"- ^0-'\^ ^y^-' '^^ ^•^ ^^"' &8' &y SESPONDENTS 'Sis ~'a:SV&:^ ss?^ •fis^','^^c'- ^' sr^ O.P. Sahu, aged about 42 years, son of Shri Tulsi Ram Sahu, Cluster Acadeinic Co-ordinator, Cluster Centre, Guduni Block Dondi, Distt. Diirg (ChhattisgaTh) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through - the Secretary, Department of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Welfare, Deptt, Dau Kalyan Sin^i Bhawari, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Assistant Commisstoner, Scheduled Caste and Scfaeduled Tribes Developxnent, District Durg (Chhattisgarh) 3. District CoUector, Durg (Chhattisgarh) -4. Deputy ,, Colleetor, Distt. Du'rg (Chhattisgarh). :G.^&1 e^.^'L_^......_—.-„_-__ ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE ;*. CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ,T XI-HC-78 sn^T^iTf^lR) (reT3nw»iHicr ^ \ »<i«Tciia'i*iith 3^'^tFIRPT, tSnfly'IS, Rtcll^y •••^•••^•^•^/•"WI200^ an^T^ath ('i^t^tsff) s^nwtrfN'3ii^r "'•^' .-y-r.':., 11-8-2006 Mr. Y.C. Sharma, counsel fli Mr. Sumesh Bcuoj, 6ovt| advonce copy. Heard both the counsel. By the instant writ petiti^i of India, the petstioner has qu4 (Annexure P-1), whereby he has| Teacher from Primary School, School, Malkunwar, Stock; Dondi. ©rievanceof the petitio^er Coordinator Cluster Centre vide at serial No.2 in Annexure P-2. they will be provided troinjng <u( persons is filed up then they wi| Centr-e. Therefore, the petitione|r rank. In the circumstances, lear| order to bring this anomaly to t^ mcy be allowed to make a detof respondent No.3 be directed to] oppearing for the 5tote/respond4nts Hwin9 heard iearned coun) ond circumstances of the case orf' qilltd'ifl'l 111CTTiftet^t<R]<^l< ^3Tf^IT3l1^?r . or the petitioner. Advoeate for the State/r^spondents, on n under Article 226/227 of the Constitution ;stioned his trimsfer order- dated 7-7-2006 been transferred showin9 him as Assistant Pichetola, 6udum, Blocki Dondi to Primary is thot the petitioner was selected as irder dated 26-10-2002 and his name appears Last para of the said or'der prescribes that id thereafter, if the post vacated by these II be treated as re9ular Coordinator Cluster has been transferred showing his incorrect icd counsel for the petitioner submits that in ie hotice of respondent No.3, the petitioner iled representotion to respondent No.3 and decide the same, to which learned counsel has no objection. sel for the parties, having »'e9ardto the facts d without expressin9 any opinion on merit of P.T.O. / » XI-HC-78 sn^rwf^risR cwran^Tg^ G. \ Soma y ^7 *<iNrtrst»*iich S^^TORT^, ®Tn<^'|6,Rldiyy .;41'.^..<(-.J6.^/... ^. ^oo^ 3n^?r'raq? (^3g^8T) STtnwafersn^T -- s the case, fherequest made by and reosonable. Therefore, th repr-esentation roising all his gri and its annexures to respondi respondent No.3 is directed to from the date of i'ts receipt petitioner, in an objective manne Till the representation of the pe 7Tb July, 2006 (Annexure P-l), in With the directions oforei Consequently, M.(W.)P.No. disposed of. Parties dre entitted for ce| *l<lt<-l<fl-) KIKftTfffei^t <R|^K A srf^iTsn^r s^irned counsel tor Tne peTnioner is JUST, fair >4 petitioner is allowed to make a deteuled jvonces annexin9 a copy of the writ petition i^it No.3 within ten dtxys from todoy and ^lecide the representation within one month d^ter considering the points I'aised by the •Sf, on its own merits, in accordance with lcw. ^itioner is decided,the impugned order dated ^espect of the petitioner diall remain stayed. jaid, the petition stands disposed of. J3233/2006 & I.A.No.7691/a)06 ai»stand rtified copy of this order. ^ 5ud^< P.T.O.