1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.495 OF 2007 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4139 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO.3011 OF 2006 M/s.Hemco Enterprises. ...Appellant. vs. Pam Pharmaceutical and allied Machinery Co.Pvt.Ltd. & ors. ...Respondents. --- Mr.V.A.Sonpal, for Appellant. None for Respondents. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATED: 24th July,2007. 2 P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for appellant. The appeal is directed against the ad-interim order passed in notice of motion. The notice of motion is still pending. When the notice of motion will be taken up for hearing finally, the notice of motion will be decided on the basis of material which is before the learned Judge hearing the notice of motion finally. It is also a settled law that while deciding the notice of motion finally, the Court does not go by the observations made in the ad-interim order. We see no reason to interfere with the order. Hence, the appeal is disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) 3 (J.H.BHATIA,J.) ---