IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated 1.2.2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR Writ Petition No.25975 of 2006 (O.A.No.2077/95) R.Kalimuthu, Inspector of Police, Prohibition Enforcement Wing, Trichirapalli. ... Applicant -Vs.- 1.The Chairman, Tamilnadu Public Service Commission, Madras – 600 002. 2.The Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Madras-9. 3.The Secretary to Government, P and A R Department, Secretariat, Madras-9. 4.Director General of Police, Mylapore, Madras-4. ... Respondents Original Application No.2077 of 1995 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench praying to direct the respondents to include the name of applicant as Deputy Superintendent of Police Category I for the year 1995 in the "C" List. Since the Tamilnadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was received by transfer and numbered as Writ Petition. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ For petitioner : Mr.R.Kalaiselvan For respondents : Mr.S.Sivashanmugham, Government Advocate ----- O R D E R Original Application No.2077 of 1995 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench praying to direct the respondents to include the name of applicant as Deputy Superintendent of Police Category-I for the year 1995 in the "C" List. Since the Tamilnadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was received by transfer and numbered as Writ Petition. 2. The main contention raised by the learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner is that in view of the amended provision in G.O.No.368 Personal and Administrative Reforms Department dated 18.10.1993 and since the charge memo issued against the applicant/petitioner has been stayed, he should be considered for inclusion of his name in the "C" list for promotion. The petitioner relied upon the order of stay passed in O.A.No.765 of 1995 dated 28.2.1995 which has been enclosed in the typeset of papers at page No.17. 3. Learned Government Advocate referred to the reply and states that O.A.No.765 of 1995 has been dismissed on 9.11.1995 as withdrawn and, therefore, the benefit of G.O.No.368 dated 18.10.1993 will not flow to the petitioner. 4. In such view of the matter, the relief sought for in the present with petition cannot be granted as the claim of the petitioner falls outside the amended G.O.No.368 Personal and Administrative Reforms Department dated 18.10.1993. The relief sought for has also become infructuous. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. Sd/ Assistant Registrar /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ To 1.The Chairman, Tamilnadu Public Service Commission, Madras – 600 002. 2.The Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Madras-9. 3.The Secretary to Government, P and A R Department, Secretariat, Madras-9. 4.Director General of Police, Mylapore, Madras-4. +1 C.C to Mr. S.SivaShanmugam Government Advocate Sr.No.5941 Order in W.P.No.25975 of 2006 1.2.2010 TRM – C.O KV https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/