IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1620 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 7.9.2009 Baljinder Singh ......Petitioner(s) Versus Arpat Shukla & others ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. HPS Ghuman, Advocate for the petitioner. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) CM Nos.21207 & 21208-CII of 2009 Applications are allowed subject to all just exceptions. COCP No.1620 of 2009 The grievance of the petitioner in this case is that despite a decree of permanent injunction in his favour vide Annexure P-1, the respondents are threatening to dispossess him and thus, have disobeyed the judgment and decree of the Civil Court which amounts to contempt as defined under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act. Admittedly, the petitioner has filed an execution petition under Order 21 Rule 32 of Civil Procedure Code for execution of the aforesaid judgment and decree dated 11.9.1999. In view of the aforesaid fact alone, I am not inclined to proceed further in this contempt petition as the petitioner is already pursuing an effective and alternative remedy for redressal of his grievances. Dismissed. However, it is expected that the Executing Court shall proceed with the aforesaid execution petition in accordance with law and expeditiously. September 7, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE