^- IzrO"' IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF'CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURfC.G.1 WRIT PETITION (C) N0. fe4o6 OF 2010(S.B.) PETITIONER RESPONDENTS <9-'"' ••< fly~.^}^ ^^ ^^y <-*: si'i-~x'^'~ y =y \^v' Leeladhar Prasad Chandrakar, AdvOGate, S/o Sarju Prasad Chandrakar, aged about 43 years, R/o House No. B-l, Pavan VUiar, New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur (C.G.). VERSUS 1. TheState of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Law and Legislatiye Departrnent, D.K.S. . Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). ^ : : ' ; : 2. The District 8s Sessions Judge, Raipur(C.G.). WRITPEH<ITIONUNDER%RTICLE,22'8.QFTHEeON§TrTUTION QFINDIA .jltrialtM" ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON (Ct N0. 6506 OF2010 Petltioner Leeladhar Prasad Chandrakar Versus Respondents The State of Chhattisgarh & Another WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon'bte Mr. SatishK. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- ShriMalay KumarBhaduri, Advocatefor thepetitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER(ORAU (Passed on 07th day of December, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitiorier submits that the petitioner may be permittedto withdraw this petition with liberty to flle fresh petition, asanother cause of action has arisen. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side has no objectlon. 3. Aamrdingly, the petition is dismissed, as withdrawn w h liberty to fite a fresh petition,Jf spadvised. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge •^ ashok 1