IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 33 OF 2009 MARIA ELSA DE NORONHA WOLFANGO DA SILVA (DECESED) THROUGH LR ANTONIO S. C. PEREIRA ... Appellant Versus RAJASHRI ALIAS RAJANI U. BHAKTA AND 5 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. V. R. Tamba, Advocate with Mr. D. D. Zaveri, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. J. P. Mulgaonkar, Advocate for the Respondents. Coram:- F. M. REIS, J. Date:- 30th July, 2010 P.C. Heard learned Counsel for the Appellant and the Respondents. 2. After hearing the matter for sometime, the following Order has been passed by consent of both the Counsel. (i) The Counsel for the Respondents states that whatever construction activity is being carried out in the suit property, is pursuant to the licence granted by the City Corporation of Panaji, dated 29.12.2009 and that the Respondents have not contravened or committed any breach to the terms as stated in the said licence. Such construction activity shall be carried out as long as he obtains the requisite licence from the City Corpora- tion, Panaji. (ii) The learned Counsel for the Respondents further states that the Respondents shall not claim any equities for such work carried out during the pendency of the suit. (iii)Both the said statements are accepted. (iv) The learned Civil Judge, Senior Division at Panaji, is directed to dispose of the Regular Civil Suit no. 342/2000/A as expeditiously as possible in, any event, on or before 31.12.2011. 3. The Appeal stands disposed of accordingly with no Orders as to costs. F. M. REIS, J. arp/*