IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14321 of 2010 AMRITA PASWAN . Versus THE LALIT NARAYAN MITHILA UNIVERSITY & OTHERS ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Bhavesh Kumar, Advocate For the University: Mr. Santosh Kumar Jha, Advocate ------ 2. 20.09.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the University. The petitioner claims to have been a student of B.Sc.(Honours) Course in the Womens College at Samastipur. She claims having passed the lst year in September 2006 and 2nd year in September 2007. Her result for 3rd year is not being published for the reason that she has not cleared the lst year. The submission is that she has cleared the lst year and therefore the University allowed her to appear in the second and third year. The petitioner is stated to have represented for publication of her results. Counsel for the University invites attention of the Court to the lst year result appended at Annexure 1. He submits that the petitioner appears to have failed to secure the qualifying marks in the paper of Yoga (theory) having secured only 66 marks. This Court finds additional deficiencies in the mark sheet appended to the writ petition apparent on the face of the mark sheet. It is not possible for this Court to pass any order simpliciter for publication of result on the ground that she has been allowed to appear in the second and third year of the examination. If the petitioner has represented let the same be disposed of by a reasoned and speaking order of the Vice Chancellor within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt and/or presentation of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)