IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08.02.2010 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R. SUDHAKAR W.P.No. 33733 of 2006 (OA.No.8974/98) N. RAJAVELU GR-II P.C. 595, KANDAMANGALAM POLICE STATION VILLUPURAM. [ PETITIONER ] Vs THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE [ RESPONDENT ] VILLUPURAM DISTRICT. Prayer Original Application No.8974 of 1998 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench to issue a direction to the respondent to consider the claim of the Petitioner for promotion as Gr-I P.C. Head Constable and Sub-Inspector of Police wihtout reference to the disciplinary proceedings and grant him all consequential service and monetary benefits at par with his juniors and grant him such further relief(s) as this Honourable Court may deem fit under the circumstances arising out of this case. Since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was re- transferred and numbered as Writ petition. For Petitioner .. Mr.K. Venkataramani Senior Counsel for M. Muthuappan For Respondents .. Mr. S. Sivashanmugam Government Advocate ORDER Original Application No.8974 of 1998 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench to issue a direction to the respondent to consider the claim of the Petitioner for promotion as Gr-I P.C. Head Constable and Sub-Inspector of Police wihtout reference to the disciplinary proceedings and grant him all consequential service and monetary benefits at par with his juniors https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ and grant him such further relief(s) as this Honourable Court may deem fit under the circumstances arising out of this case. Since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was re- transferred and numbered as Writ petition. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the petitioner Mr.Rajavelu's post was upgraded as Grade I police constable on 03.03.1993 and further as Head Constable with effect from 24.11.1994 and subsequently, he also got the benefit of further promotion. In such a view of the matter even according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the substantial relief sought for in the present O.A has been granted. However, the learned counsel pleads that the benefit flowing out of such upgradation that is monetary benefits has not been given to the petitioner and therefore he is prejudiced. 3. Heard, Mr. S. Sivashanmugam, learned Government Advocate, who stated that the petitioner should make a representation to the competent authority for redressal of his grievance as above. 4. Once the upgradation is given all the consequential benefits if any should follow as per eligibility. The respondent is therefore directed to consider the claim of the petitioner for any monetary benefits on merits and eligibility as per service rules. The petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the concerned authority who shall consider and dispose of the said representation on merits within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of such representation. With the aforesaid observations, this writ petition stands disposed of. sms Sd/- Asst. Registrar //True Copy// Sub Asst. Registrar To: THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE VILLUPURAM DISTRICT. + 1 cc to Government Pleader, SR No.8090 NSM(CO) SR/8.3.2010 W.P.No. 33733 of 2006 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/