IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 6/?8 Q9966 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PETITIONER : /Smt.Budhwara D/ o Mansingh, age 6O years Permanent Gangman PWD—Bilaspur R/ o.Bharari, Distt-Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS : }]/ State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Public 30 w Works Deptt, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan-Raipur (C.G.) Sub Divisional Officer, FWD—2, Bilaspur. Distt-Bilaspur @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPvR W. P. No. 698 of 2007 Pe'i'ifioner' = Smf. Budhwara Versus Respondenfs = S'l'a‘i'é of Chhai‘fisgurh & ano‘rher SB: Hon‘ble Mr. Jusfke snfish K. Agniho‘h'i: J Present: Mr. Ashok Vaishnav, Advoca'fe for fhe paifioner. Mr. Sushi! Dubey, Government Advocme for *he S‘ra‘te/ respondenfs. 0 R D E R (Passed on #his 7m Day of February, 2007) 1. Learned counSel appearing for ‘rhe pai'rioner as we" as for The SMfe/respondenfs join‘rly submit fhaf the fads of fhe presenf wri‘r pefifion are similar *0 fha+ of in W. P. No. 454/2005 (Ram Prasad Vadav & whers vs. Shin of Chha‘r'risgarh & O‘rhers), which was allowed vide order dafed 41-2007. They fur‘l'her submi‘r fhaf the question of law involved is also fhe some. 2. In View of fhe above~sfafed submissions made by learned counsel for fhe par’ries, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order dated 4.1.2007 passed by this Court in W. P. No. 454/2006 (Rom Prasad Vadav & others vs. State of Chhattisgarh 8i others). No order as to costs. l i Sdl- y Satish K. Agnihotri J Judge éi.v/ i