IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO.1343 OF 2009 Dt.18.1.2010 Between: Osmania University, Rep. by its Registrar, Osmania University Campus Hyderabad … Appellant And Md. Khader, S/o. Md. Ali (Late) Dept. of Botany, P.G. College Secunderabad and others … Respondents Counsel for the Appellant: Sri K. Srikanth, representing Sri Deepak Bhattacharjee Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 7: Sri D.V. Nagi Reddy, Counsel for Respondent No.8: G.P. for Higher Education Counsel for Respondent No.9: G.P. for Finance & Planning THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO.1343 OF 2009 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy) This Writ Appeal is filed against order dt.07.08.2009 in Writ Petition No.21314 of 1999 whereby the learned Single Judge allowed the Writ Petition filed by respondent Nos.1 to 7 and directed the appellant and respondent Nos.8 and 9 to fix the pay scale of Rs.410- 625 as per RPS-1978 to respondent Nos.1 to 7/writ petitioners in the category of Lab Attendants. The learned Judge also directed that respondent Nos.1 to 7 shall be entitled to all consequential benefits, including arrears of salary. A perusal of the record shows that seeking a similar relief, certain persons, who are also employees of the appellant, filed Writ Petition No.4013 of 1988, which was allowed by this Court. The learned Single Judge, therefore, relied upon the said order in allowing the Writ Petition filed by respondent Nos.1 to 7. It is not in dispute that the order of this Court dt.21.9.1992 in W.P. No.4013 of 1988 had attained finality and that the same has already been implemented. Therefore, in our opinion, the learned Single Judge has rightly allowed the Writ Petition and granted the relief to respondent Nos.1 to 7. We do not, therefore, find any error in the order of the learned Single Judge. The Writ Appeal is accordingly dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Appeal, W.A.M.P. No.2829 of 2009, filed by the appellant/petitioner for interim relief, is dismissed. ______________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ ________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 18.1.2010 bnr