THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 2672 of 2009 ORDER: 1. This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 02.06.2009 in I.A. No.4 of 2009 in L.R.A. No.2 of 2009 on the file of the Chairman, Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal-cum-II Additional District Judge, West Godavari at Eluru, whereunder and whereby petition filed to grant stay of all further proceedings in C.C. No.874/VJA/75 before the Land Reforms Tribunal, Vijayawada including taking over possession of lands in R.S. No.128/1B of North Valluru, Thotlavalluru mandal, was dismissed on the ground that the petitioners failed to establish that they are in possession and enjoyment of the property as on the date of filing of the appeal. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners contended that since the petitioners purchased the property under registered document, they are deemed to be in possession and enjoyment of the property. He further contended that, a direction may be given to dispose of the appeal as early as possible in accordance with law. 3. None appears for the respondents inspite of service of notice. 4. Writ Petition No.6546 of 1992 was filed by the petitioners herein and others, to issue a writ of mandamus declaring surrender of the lands by one Gopisetty Ramakrishna Mohan in favour of the Government as illegal. The said Writ Petition was allowed by this Court, inter alia, leaving it open for the authorities to consider the case of the petitioners therein for grant of patta, if they are entitled under the Rules. 5. A categorical finding has been recorded by the Tribunal that in pursuance of the vacation of stay in the Writ Petition, the revenue authorities granted eksal pattas to third parties and the leases are being extended from time to time. Therefore, in view of the said finding, it cannot be accepted that the present petitioners are in possession of the property so as to grant injunction. Even in the appeal also, they have not filed a scrap of paper to show that in pursuance of the execution of registered sale deed, they are put in possession and enjoyment of the property. When the petitioners are not shown to be in possession of the property by producing relevant documents, the question of granting injunction does not arise. That is the reason why the appellate Tribunal rightly dismissed the application and so there are no grounds to interfere with the same. However, the appellate tribunal shall dispose of the appeal in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, uninfluenced by any of the observations made in this order. 6. The Civil Revision Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs. --------------------- 19.10.2010 (K.C.Bhanu, J.) DRK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 2672 of 2009 19.10.2010 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 2672 of 2009 19.10.2010 Between: Thota Mallikharjuna Rao & others …Petitioners And Land Reforms Tribunal-cum-Sub Collector, Vijayawada, Krishna district & another …Respondents