1 Ash FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1057 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri P.R. Arjunwadkar for the Petitioners. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 26TH MARCH, 2010 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners. The Petitioners are the Defendants. When the witness summoned by the Respondents-Plaintiffs was deposing before the Court, an objection was raised by the Advocate for the Petitioners for showing a particular receipt to the witness. It was contended by filing a separate application that the said receipt was regarding the photographs relating to a construction allegedly carried out by the Petitioners and the application for amendment of the Plaint based on the said construction has been rejected. 2. The order impugned is purely interlocutory in 2 nature. The Trial Court has observed that the question whether the receipt sought to be referred to in the evidence is relevant or not is to be decided at the time of final hearing of the suit. Considering the fact that the order is purely interlocutory in nature, at this stage, no interference is called for with the impugned order. The Petitioners can always challenge the impugned order while preferring an appeal against the decree passed in the suit if the same be adverse to the Petitioners. The contention of the Petitioners that the witness cannot be permitted to adduce evidence as regards the Receipt No. 266 and the photographs relating to the said receipt, is expressly kept open. Even if the Advocate for the Petitioners cross-examines the witness on the said documents, it is obvious that the cross-examination will be without prejudice to the contention of the Petitioners that the said documents are not relevant and without prejudice to the right of the Petitioners of challenging the impugned order while preferring an appeal against the decree. 3. Subject to what is observed above, the Writ Petition is not entertained and the same is rejected. (A.S.OKA, J)