1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4525/02 Hanuman Lal Jat vs. The Chairman, JVVNL & Ors. Date of order : 15/1/2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ None present for the petitioner. Shri S.P. Sharma for the respondent. ****** This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the grievance that the respondents be directed to pay to him arrears of salary for the period of his suspension and further the respondents be directed to give him benefit of annual grade increments, fixation and other consequential benefits. Petitioner in this writ petition has contended that he was placed under suspension under Section 467, 468 and 420 IPC, in which although he was subjected to trial but was ultimately acquitted by judgement of the Court of Civil Judge (J.D.), Jhalawar vide judgment dated 3.5.1997, even then the respondents have not granted him all the aforesaid benefits. Shri S.P. Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respondents has contended 2 that petitioner has not come out with full facts and has concealed the fact that on the same charges, he was earlier subjected to disciplinary proceedings. The charge was that he prepared a fraud order, although for technical reasons, he was acquitted, but he was found guilty in departmental enquiry, but taking lenient view of the matter, the respondents awarded him penalty of stoppage of two annual grade increments without cumulative effect under Regulation 6 of RSEB Employees (Classification Control & Appeal) Regulation, 1962. Learned counsel also submitted that petitioner has already been given the benefit of increments of two years and his pay fixation order was passed and arrears have been paid to him, details of which are given in the reply to the writ petition. Upon consideration of the arguments, I find that the only question that remains to be decided by the respondents is as to the difference of the salary and the amount of subsistence allowance paid to the petitioner and in fact they were required to take a view about that when they pass the final 3 order of penalty on 19.11.1999. The writ petition is therefore disposed of with direction to the respondents to pass a specific order as to in what manner they decided to recall the suspension period of petitioner on the question of payment of the aforesaid and shall serve upon the petitioner copy of such order within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this judgement. The copy of this order be endorsed to the petitioner for intimation. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/