IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.5329 of 2011 Date of Decision: August 23, 2011 Rajesh Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Vivek Singla, Advocate, for Mr.B.S.Saroha, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The punishment imposed on the petitioner for stoppage of increment was commuted to censure. The petitioner, therefore, claimed the amount which had been deducted on account of stoppage of increment. The petitioner has served a legal notice, but the amount has not been refunded so far. Without going into the merits of the controversy, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the legal notice served by the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. August 23, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE