- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION.NO.6146 OF 2005 IN CRI.APPL.NO. 6145 OF 2005 IN CRI.APPEAL NO. OF 2005 The State of Maharashtra ..Applicant Vs. Daya P.Talekar ..Respondent .... Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh A.P.P. for Applicant Mr.Rajan Salvi Advocate (absent) for Respondent .... CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : APRIL 21,2006 DATE : APRIL 21,2006 DATE : APRIL 21,2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned advocate for the Applicant. This is an application for condonation of delay. Respondent is served. The learned advocate for the Respondent is not present. No affidavit is filed. We have perused the application. The delay of 21 days is satisfactorily explained. Hence, delay is condoned. 2. Application is allowed and disposed of. Rule made absolute. Appeal to be placed for admission on 27.4.2006. [D.G.DESHPANDE, J.] - 2 - [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]