H!GHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARH.BILASPUR CONTEIViPTCASE(GiV!l)No.297ofl008 N.R.,,Jandge, S/o Shri BhaKla @ Khorbahara, aged about 61 yeara 5-month, R/o QQvemment HiglTer SecondarYScfiQolSa auti,Distriot Sarguja at present acidress HigheF SeconciarySchoolBagicha,DistriGt 1 M.KRaout.i.-- -'^' ' TheSecretary, , - - SfateofChhatti^gaFh,. rribal Welfare ^epartment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(CQ) • 2 R.K.Sidar, ^' •TlieAssistant.eomrBissioner, rribal Welfare Departmenf, Distrjct yashpyr(CG)' : .^ :' , • : CQNS'TITUTIiQN^FlNDift Mr. RaviMahfeshwari, CQunseife>rthe;petitioner. IL ^J, Heard. •; " :'::.' ',..'.-'"":', : : Petitioner-N.R. Jandge has fi!ed this petition for initiation of proceedings.ofcontempt^againsttiierespondents for the alleged defaylt:^Tn eompliance of the| order dated 04.09.2008 passedin'W.P:(S5No.4878^008. ^; Mr. Maheshwari, leamed^eounsel for'the petitioner submits that the,p^itjoneF, who Was^ w^ Priricipal in G6yernrnentrfNigher Secondary ScKool, Bagicha, Distnct Jashpur, yras. .fransferrecr ,fFom ^the .said ^ Rtaceyto CONTEMPT CASE (Civi!) No.297 of 2008 Government Higher Secondary School, Sakhauli, Dlstrict Sarguja, Ambikapur. Thesaid order was challenged bythe petitioner in W.P.(S) No.3983 of 2008. The aforesaid writ petition was disposed of by this CQUrt by passing the following order on 24.07.2008: . 'With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petition.er submits that the .petitioner does not want to press this petition on merits at this stage. However, the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation before the concerned authorities within a period of three days and the same may be directed to be decided within the prescribed time. 3. Shri Thakur, learned counse! appearing for the State submits that if the representation is made, the same shall be decided by the concerned authority within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of 5. 6. Shri Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, further submits that no coercive stepsshall be taken, tiil the disposal ofthe representation. In view of foregolng, the petition is disposed of. Noorder as to costs. Consequentiy, I.A. No.1, application for interim relief, also stands disposed of." Learned counsel for the petitioner furthersubmits that thereaftsr, the petitioner made a representation, butthesame was dismissed. He submits that dismissa! of the ^ -iii£- CONTEMPT CASE (Civin No. 29^ of2008 representation was again chalienged in W.P.(S5 No.4878/2008, ih which, the order dated 04.09.2008 was passed.Theorderdated 04.09.2008 passedinW.P.(S) No.4878/2008readsasunder: i "Shri Ravi Maheswari, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur.Deputy Advoeate General fbr theState. ,. • • ' . . : . • Li^ if along with : Writ Petiti In the meantime, no coerclve steps shali be taken .against the^.petitioner 'tiil the next ,date of heanrfg./'';,:. ' .^.•;.,'..: ^ .'.^ Leamed counsel'.for the petitionsr submifs tliat in the meanwhile, the petitioner joined at the transferred plac®and now, he has retired from serviceon 31.03.2Q09. ; Learned counsel for the petitidner could not pQint but ast6inwhatmannertReorderciated04.09.2Q08wasviolated bytherespondents.7'; 1. ' In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the icase, whenthepetitionerhasaireadyretiredfromserviceandithas not been demonstrated that in what manner the order dated L09.2008 was violated, lam not inclined to proceed forther in the matter of contempt on the above vague grounds. ; The petition deserves to be arjd is hereby disn'iissed suinmarily. • , , shyna Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge tH^~n