Criminal Misc.-M No. 16704 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 16704 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 8.8.2011 Rajbir and another .. Petitioners v. State of Haryana .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Sudhir Mittal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sandeep Vermani, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. ... Rajesh Bindal J. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the FIR was registered, inter-alia, with the allegations that the sale-deed, which was to be registered in the name of the complainant, was in fact got registered by petitioner No. 1 in the name of his wife (petitioner No. 2). Prior to the lodging of the FIR, a civil suit was filed by the complainant. In that suit, the matter was settled between the parties and the civil suit stands withdrawn. Reference has also been made to the affidavit sworn by the complainant (Annexure-P3) stating that the complainant has compromised the dispute with the petitioners. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners join investigation and appear before the Investigating Officer on 18.8.2011 at 10.00 A.M. In case of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer. They shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when Criminal Misc.-M No. 16704 of 2011 [2] called upon for further investigation. They shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. However, in case the facts stated by learned counsel for the petitioners are found to be incorrect, the State shall be at liberty to file application for re-calling of the order. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 8.8.2011 mk