IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 23RD MAY 2008 / 2ND JYAISHTA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 1613 of 2007(S) --------------------------------------- (AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C)NO.12062/2005-J DATED 2.8.2007) PETITIONER ----------------- C.J.MATHAI, CHELATHAZHATHU(VANCHICKAL)HOUSE, KIDANGOOR SOUTH P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.G.ANIL BABU RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. SHRI. V.K.AYYAPPAN, AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER,(IN CHARGE), KOTTAYAM. 2. SRI. JOY JOSEPH, S/O JOSEPH, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PALLIKKARA HOUSE, KOODALLOOR P.O., KIDANGOOR, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. N. SUDHA DEVI SRI.C.S. MANU. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ C.O.C.No.1613 OF 2007 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of May, 2008 JUDGMENT By the judgment, non-compliance of which is complained of in this Contempt Case I had directed the respondent to pay certain amounts to the petitioner. The review petition filed by the respondent was dismissed by me. Admittedly, the respondents have filed a Writ Appeal against the order in the review petition, in which there is an order directing deposit of the amount directed to be paid. That being so, it is not proper at this point of time to continue with the contempt proceedings. Therefore, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to move afresh after orders are passed in the writ appeal, if necessary, this Contempt Case is closed. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd