WP(C) 4752/2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. K.K. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. R. Chokraborty, learned Addl. Sr. Govt. Advocate. I have also heard Mr. B. Goswami , learned SC, Water Resources Department. The grievance of the petitioner is that inspite of carrying out the cont ractual works, he has not been paid his dues by the respondents. It is submitted that the case of the petitioner is covered by the decision in Tamsher Ali and o rs. vs. State of Assam and ors. reported in 2008 (4) GLT 1. Certain guidelines h ave been framed in the said decision towards payment of contractual works. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the said guide lines. The respondents may examine the case of the petitioner in terms of the sa id directions/guidelines to find out as to whether the petitioner is entitled to claim the amount or any part thereof. Although the petitioner has annexed a le tter/certificate issued by the Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department pu rportedly admitting the amount, but as submitted by the learned Standing counse l, Water Resources Department, such admissibility of the certificate is requir ed to be issued by the Chief Engineer/HOD in terms of the aforesaid judgment. Writ petition is disposed of. The petitioner may obtain the certified co py of this order and produce the same before the respondents alongwith the copy of this writ petition and its enclosures.