IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1296 of 1997 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- AMRATLAL BHOLIDAS PATEL Versus BHIKHABHAI M THAKORE-HUF KARTAOF BHIKHABHAI MADABHAI THAKORE -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Civil Revision Application No. 1296 of 1997 MR RN SHAH for Petitioner No. 1-2 MR HR PRAJAPATI for Respondent No. 1-2 NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR Date of decision: 17/03/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT The petitioners are the original defendants of Civil Suit No.600/90, which is pending in the Court of learned Civil Judge (S.D.) at Ahmedabad Rural. In the said suit, an application for amendment of the plaint was preferred. The learned Judge by his order below Exh.26 allowed the said amendment application, against which this revision is preferred. 2) Since the impugned order of the trial Court is in the nature of an interlocutory order, this revision is not maintainable in view of the amendment in Section 115 of C.P.C. 3) Accordingly, this Civil Revision Application is disposed of as the same is not maintainable. Rule is discharged. No order as to costs. (P.B.Majmudar,J.) /malek