1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3158 OF 2008. IN M.C.A.ST.NO.6185/2008 IN W.P.NO.4830/2007. (M.S.R.PRIMARY TEACHERS COMMITTEE VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Shri N.D.Khamborkar, Advocate for Applicant. Shri S.B.Ahirkar, A.G.P. for Respondent. CORAM : A.H.JOSHI AND B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 29, 2008. 1. Heard learned Advocates for the parties. 2. Prayer is made to condone delay of 113 days in filing the Miscellaneous Civil Application i.e. MCA St.No.6185/2008. The M.C.A. seeks review of order, dated 19th October, 2007 passed in Writ Petition No.4830/2007, which reads thus : “1. Learned Government Pleader Shri Nitin Sambre states that he would advise the Government to decide the representation of the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible. 2. In view of this, the learned Advocate for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition. 3. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.” 2 3. It is, therefore, apparent that the learned Government Pleader had only stated that he would advise the Government to decide the representation, and being satisfied with this statement, the petitioners have withdrawn the writ petition. 4. In these circumstances, this Court has not issued any direction to the Government to decide the representation, therefore, the grievance that, the Government has still not decided the representation, cannot be the ground for review of the said order. There is no error apparent enabling us to exercise that jurisdiction. 5. Therefore, though, for the reasons disclosed in Civil Application No.3158/2008, we condone the delay, we dismiss the application for review. JUDGE JUDGE RR.