IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION Nos. 1363, 1368, 5460 of 1995 SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 260 of 1995 and SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 443 of 1996 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL ======================================================== 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? ---------------------------------------------------------- RAMBAI DEVJI VARSANI Versus DY DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER ---------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR SHANTILAL M SHAH for Petitioners MR AN PATEL for Petitioner (SCA No. 442 of 1996) MR MP PRAJAPATI for Petitioner (SCA No.260/95) MR SN SHELAT, ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL with MR MR RAVAL, AGP instructed by MESSRS. H.M BHAGAT & Company for the respondents. ---------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL Date of decision: 25/04/97 COMMON ORAL JUDGEMENT In these matters, rule is issued and is heard today. Learned advocate for the respective petitioner waives service of the rule. In view of the larger Bench judgment, the learned advocates for the petitioners request the Court to permit them to withdraw the petitions with a view to enable the petitioners to take appropriate action under the provisions of the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. The petitioners are directed to approach the appropriate authority within a period of six weeks from today. It is further directed that the competent authority shall not raise any objection about the delay, if such an application is made within six weeks from today. In view of the above order, interim relief granted earlier to continue, if such application is made within a period of six weeks from today. The authority shall decide the application in accordance with law. In view of the aforesaid, the petitions stand disposed as withdrawn. Rule is discharged. No order as to costs. **** Prakash*