PETITIONERS HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH :_ BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 1587 OF 2009 ’I. Subash Kumar Sahu. Sic Shri Jeevan Lal Sahu, age about 24 years, Rlo GAD qual'IEI'S. House NO.H/31, Mahasamund, Disit. Mahasamund (CG). 2. Neeaj Kumar Verma, S/o Shri R.K. Verma, age about 30 years, Rio Adarsh Nagar, Mahasamund. DiStt. Mahasamund (CG). 3. Kundan Lal Pendariya. Sic Shri Harakh Ram Pendariya, age about 27 years, R/o Near Shri Ram Mandir. Ward No.13. Mahasamund, Distt. Mahasamund (CG). 4. Geshwar Singh Deewan, S/o Shri Preetam Singh Deewan, age about 24 years, Rio New Civii Line Collectcr Colony, Qtr. No. GAD-E-3, Mahasamund, DIStt. Mahasamund (CG). 5. Gourav Kumar Patel. Slo Late Shti Yudhishthir Patel. age about 25 years, Rio village Birkol, Post ‘Nawagarh, Via Saraipaii, Distt. Mahasamund (CG). 6. Sachit Kumar Sahu. S/o Shri Meghraj Sahu, age about 25 years, R/o Tongoponi, Post Bakma, Block Bagbahra. Distt. Mahasamund (CG) Purandar Kumar Banchhor, Slo Shri Shobha Ram Banchhor, age about 28 years, R/o village Chandkhuri, Post Naugadi, via Basna. Distt. Mahasamund (CG). 8. Padman Kumar Patel, Slo Shri Janak Ram Patel, age about 27 years, R/o village Damdarha, Post Tamtora, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (CG). Versus 1. State ,Govt. of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Panchayat & Rural Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan’, Raipur (CG). 2. Chief Executive Officer, Ziia Panchayat, Mahasamund, Distt. Mahasamund (CG). 3. Professional Examination Board. Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG). . / ,V 4. District Education Officer, Mahasamund, Distt. Mahasamund (CG). (Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Somkant Verma, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Adv. General with Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State. RA OR ER (Passed on this 13 day of April, 2009) With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the petition is heard finally. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners do not want to oontest the matter on merit, at this stage. However, learned counsel prays that the respondent authorities may be directed to consider the pending representation of the petitioners within a stipulated period. 3) Shri Thakur. learned Dy. Adv. General appearing with Ms Jain, learned Panel Lawyer for the State, submits that if the representation of the petitioners is pending. the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, on its own merits. as early as possible preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4) In view of the foregoing, according to learned counsel for the petitioners, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 5) Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. ’/ / 4 a Sdl- _ Judge Gowri Satish K. Agnihotn