1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION No. 6234 of 2003 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL ============================================================== ============================================================== RAMANBHAI ZANZARBHAI GHANGHAR, - Applicant(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT &1 - Respondent(s) ============================================================== Appearance : MR BM MANGUKIYA for Petitioner No(s).: 1. Mr.Gohil, Addl.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent No(s).: 1. MR ASHISH M DAGLI for Respondent No(s).: 2. ============================================================== CORAM :HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL Date : 13/07/2005 ORAL JUDGMENT Heard Mr.Mangukia, Ld.advocate for the petitioner, Mr.Gohil, Ld.APP for the respondent-State and Mr.Dagli, Ld.advocate for the original 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? 2. 3. complainant. After hearing learned counsel appearing for the parties, when the court was about to pass the order rejecting the petition, Mr.Mangukia, Ld.advocate for the petitioner submitted that any observations made by the court may prejudice the trial of his client, and therefore, he is not inviting the reasons for rejection and, therefore, he sought permission to withdraw the petition. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, permission granted. Petition is rejected as withdrawn. Rule is discharged. Interim relief vacated. (JAYANT PATEL,J) 13.7.05/murty