IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6022 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: 15.02.2007 Mohanjit Singh Sekhon ...Petitioner . Versus Baldev Singh ...Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL. PRESENT: Sh.J.S.Cooner, Advocate, for the petitioner. Sh.Arun Palli, Advocate, for the respondent. *** VINEY MITTAL, J.(ORAL) Landlord is the petitioner before this Court. He is aggrieved against the order dated September 02, 2006 passed by the Rent Controller whereby in a petition filed under Section 13-B of the East Punjab Rent Restriction Act, leave to defend has been granted to the defendant- respondent. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration observations made by the Rent Controller, I find that leave to defend has rightly been granted by the Rent Controller. Various pleas raised by the tenant-respondent are required to be finally determined by the Rent Controller. However, the learned Rent Controller shall try to expedite the proceedings in the rent petition. Dismissed. February 15, 2007 ( VINEY MITTAL ) seema JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6023 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: 15.02.2007 Mohanjit Singh Sekhon ...Petitioner . Versus Jindal Cloth House, through its Proprietor and another ...Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL. PRESENT: Sh.J.S.Cooner, Advocate, for the petitioner. Sh.Arun Palli, Advocate, for the respondents. *** VINEY MITTAL, J.(ORAL) Landlord is the petitioner before this Court. He is aggrieved against the order dated September 02, 2006 passed by the Rent Controller whereby in a petition filed under Section 13-B of the East Punjab Rent Restriction Act, leave to defend has been granted to the defendant- respondents. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration observations made by the Rent Controller, I find that leave to defend has rightly been granted by the Rent Controller. Various pleas raised by the tenant-respondents are required to be finally determined by the Rent Controller. However, the learned Rent Controller shall try to expedite the proceedings in the rent petition. Dismissed. February 15, 2007 ( VINEY MITTAL ) seema JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6024 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: 15.02.2007 Mohanjit Singh Sekhon ...Petitioner . Versus M/s Ram Karan Dass Rajinder Paul and another ...Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL. PRESENT: Sh.J.S.Cooner, Advocate, for the petitioner. Sh.Arun Palli, Advocate, for the respondents. *** VINEY MITTAL, J.(ORAL) Landlord is the petitioner before this Court. He is aggrieved against the order dated September 02, 2006 passed by the Rent Controller whereby in a petition filed under Section 13-B of the East Punjab Rent Restriction Act, leave to defend has been granted to the defendant- respondents. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration observations made by the Rent Controller, I find that leave to defend has rightly been granted by the Rent Controller. Various pleas raised by the tenant-respondents are required to be finally determined by the Rent Controller. However, the learned Rent Controller shall try to expedite the proceedings in the rent petition. Dismissed. February 15, 2007 ( VINEY MITTAL ) seema JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6025 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: 15.02.2007 Mohanjit Singh Sekhon ...Petitioner . Versus M/s Jodha Ram Ram Kishan and another ...Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL. PRESENT: Sh.J.S.Cooner, Advocate, for the petitioner. Sh.Arun Palli, Advocate, for the respondents. *** VINEY MITTAL, J.(ORAL) Landlord is the petitioner before this Court. He is aggrieved against the order dated September 02, 2006 passed by the Rent Controller whereby in a petition filed under Section 13-B of the East Punjab Rent Restriction Act, leave to defend has been granted to the defendant- respondents. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration observations made by the Rent Controller, I find that leave to defend has rightly been granted by the Rent Controller. Various pleas raised by the tenant-respondents are required to be finally determined by the Rent Controller. However, the learned Rent Controller shall try to expedite the proceedings in the rent petition. Dismissed. February 15, 2007 ( VINEY MITTAL ) seema JUDGE