HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.12038 of 2004 Date : 09.12.2011 Between : Kuchipudi Sundaramma. …..Petitioner And Special Deputy Collector (Tribal Welfare), Bhadrachalam & others. …..Respondents HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.12038 of 2004 ORDER : This writ petition is filed, seeking a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents 1 and 2 in trying to dispossess the petitioner from the land admeasuring Ac.6.30 gts., situated in Sy.No.502/1504 of Manuguru village and Mandal in Khammam District, as illegal and arbitrary, with a consequential direction restraining the respondents from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of petitioner over the aforesaid land. Case of the petitioner is that she is the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac.6.30 gts. in Sy.No.502/1504 of Manuguru village, having purchased the same on 06.06.1968 from a non-tribal by name Sri Doddapaneni Nagaiah. It is stated that earlier, proceedings were initiated against the petitioner under the provisions of the A.P.Scheduled Area Land Transfer Regulation Rules, 1969, in which, the 1st respondent- Special Deputy Collector (Tribal Welfare), has passed orders in favour of the petitioner in Proceedings, dated 05.01.2001, in LTR.Case No.1170/2000/MGR. The grievance of the petitioner is that inspite of passing orders in her favour, respondents 1 and 2, at the instance of respondents 3 to 5, are taking steps to dispossess her from the land in question. In the counter affidavit filed by the 1st respondent, he has admitted passing of orders, dated 05.01.2001, in favour of the petitioner in LTR.Case No.1170/2000/MGR, and denied the allegation of taking steps for dispossessing the petitioner from the land in question. It is further stated that this writ petition is filed on mere apprehension, though no steps are taken for dispossessing the petitioner from the above land. From the averments made in the counter affidavit, it is clear that the earlier proceedings initiated against the petitioner under the A.P. Scheduled Area Land Transfer Regulation Rules, 1969, have become final and an order, dated 05.01.2001, is passed in her favour in LTR.Case No.1170/2000/MGR. In that view of the matter, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition, directing respondents 1 and 2 not to interfere with the possession of petitioner over the land admeasuring Ac.6.30 gts., situated in Sy.No.502/1504 of Manuguru village and Mandal of Khammam District. Subject to the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 9th December 2011 rrb/ajr