[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3667 OF 2008 Suresh Rajaram Kadam & Ors. .... Petitioners Vs. Shaila Jayaram Kadam & Anr. .... Respondents S/Shri Rajesh Jain with Sandeep Dhangar i/b M/s. Legal Juris for the Petitioners. S/Shri M.A. Dudhane and Arvind Pawar for the Respondents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: DECEMBER 12, 2008 P.C: P.C: P.C: The petitioners/landlords have challenged the impugned order whereby both the Courts below considering the materials available on record and in the interest of justice condoned the delay of 280 days. The contention is that in the application the delay of 75 days was mentioned. However, as same was objected and pointed out by the petitioners, still the Court has condoned the delay even after considering the submissions of the petitioners. The discretion is exercised by the Courts below and considering the fact that the dispute is with regard to possession of the property in view of the landlord-tenant relationship, I see there is no reason to interfere with the said order. There is no perversity as such which need to be interfered in the [2] interest of justice. Therefore, the present petition is dismissed. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) sjs/D8wp3667.8 sjs/D8wp3667.8 sjs/D8wp3667.8