IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 25TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 RP.No. 372 of 2010(L) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.15025/2006 Dated 03/06/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. THE CUSTODIAN & CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS VESTED FOREST CIRCLE, OLAVAKKODE, PALAKKAD. 2. THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, PALAKKAD. 3. THE FOREST RANGE OFFICER, OTTAPALAM RANGE, PALAKKAD. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. M.P. PRAKASH RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER IN THE WPC: ------------------------------------- K.NARAYANAN, S/O.KRISHNAN, KATTAKALATHIL HOUSE, KIZHUR, PANAMANNA, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI. M.C. JOHN. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------- R.P. NO. 372 OF 2010 in W.P.C. No. 15025 of 2006 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of November, 2010 O R D E R Ramachandran Nair, J. Review Petition is filed by the petitioner stating that the actual holding by respondent is 1.761/4 acres and not 3.83 acres as mentioned in the judgment. On going through the judgment, I find that this Court has not given any finding that respondent has 3.83 acres of land in his ownership and possession. In fact, original claimant, who is respondent's father, is no more and the property is now held by the respondent and his brother. So much so, both the respondent and his brother will be entitled to only the actual extent of land held by each of them. R.P. is disposed of clarifying the judgment as above. (C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) Judge 2 kk