1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4394 OF 2009 Sushil Uttam Arke .. Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Ms.Vishranti Navale for the applicant. Mrs.P.P.Shinde A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE, J. DATED : 18TH NOVEMBER, 2009 P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. This is the second application for bail. The earlier application of the applicant was rejected vide order dated 6.5.2009. Ms.Navale, learned counsel for the applicant submits that since last about one year the applicant is behind bars and there is no possibility that the trial will begin in near future. This by itself, in my opinion, is not sufficient to consider the second application particularly in view of the fact that earlier application was rejected on merits. Hence the application is rejected. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)