1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10002 OF 2010 Gorakh s/o Laxman Jagtap & others .. PETITIONERS VERSUS Kamalbai w/o Prabhakar Kadam & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. N.C. Garud, advocate for the petitioners. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 21 st OCTOBER, 2010. PER COURT : 1 An interlocutory order permitting impleadment of the defendants on an application tendered by the respondents / plaintiffs is subjected to challenge in this petition. Concerned parties who are sought to be impleaded as the defendants are not objecting for their impleadment in the suit. However, the remaining defendants who are already on record have an objection for their impleadment in the suit. 2 I have perused the application as well as the impugned order passed 2 by the trial court. In exercise of powers conferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, no interference is called for at this interlocutory stage of the proceeding. Petition is devoid of substance hence stands rejected. 3 Pending civil application, if any, does not survive and stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp10002.10.odt