IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39377 of 2010 Arun Sao @ Arun Kumar, S/o late Bigan Sah, R/o Village Belhari, P.S. Belganj, District- Gaya. ………………….Petitioner. Versus 1. State Of Bihar 2. Sukhdeo Yadav, S/o late Chandradeep Yadav, R/o Village Belhari, P.S. Belaganj, District- Gaya. ………..Opp. Parties. ----------- 2 30.09.2011 The order impugned happens to be dated 4.9.2009 passed by the S.D.M., Sadar, Gaya in Cr. Misc. Case no. 770 of 2009 under section 144 of Cr. P.C. which appears to be reversed by A.D.J. III, Gaya in Criminal Revision No. 115 of 2009 / 35 of 2009 vide order dated 17th July, 2010 has let in filing instant petition under Section 482 of the Cr. P.C. asking for getting the order of Revisional Court set aside. The order impugned happens to be nonest in the eye of law, on account of efflux of time. Though, the revision has been held to be maintainable against the order in case, the order passed by the learned S.D.M., under Section 144 of the Cr. P.C adversely affect upon the future interest of the party. The order of the Revisional Court did not speak such requirement, although the same happens to be passed much beyond the period of 60 days of the prohibitory order having under Section 144 of the Cr.P.C. Therefore, this petition could be disposed of in following terms to ward of apprehension of the petitioner. “The order of the learned S.D.M. as well as learned 2 Additional District & Sessions Judge III will not affect the future interest of the respective parties.” The instant petition is disposed of in terms as observed above. S.P. ( Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)