..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2490 OF 2008 Mahadev Shamrao Bhaskar. ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. .... Mr.Niteen Pradhan, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 1st August, 2008. DATED : 1st August, 2008. DATED : 1st August, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.36 of 2007 of Rajarampuri Police Station, Kolhapur The said case is under Section 307, 302 of IPC. 3. The complainant and other witnesses have stated that the applicant along with four other persons assaulted Rahul. The role attributed to the applicant is that he assaulted Rahul with jambia which is a sharp-edged weapon. Eight injuries were found on the body of Rahul which are consistent with assault by sharp-edged weapon. ..(2).. 4. The learned Counsel for the applicant submitted that the accused persons have also been injured in the incident and there is no explanation by the prosecution in respect of the said injury to the accused. It is seen that there is no cross-case. I have perused the injury certificate of coaccused Anil Bhaskar and Pintu Bhaskar. The injuries of both the accused are simple in nature. Moreover, this is an aspect which can be best gone into at the time of trial. Looking to the role attributed to the applicant, I do not think that this is a fit case to grant bail. Application for bail is rejected. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)