CRM No. M 27484 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 27484 of 2010 Date of decision: 04.05.2011 Gurmukh Singh and others ........ Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: None for the petitioners Mr. J S Brar, DAG, Punjab for the respondent State Mr. Navjot Sidhu, Advocate for for respondents No. 3 and 4 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C praying for quashing of FIR No. 125 dated 28.05.2006 registered under Sections 323, 324, 427, 148, 149, 451, 326, 506 IPC at Police Station Kharar, District SAS Nagar on the basis of compromise (P1). On 17.09.2010, the parties including Juvenile were directed to appear before the trial Court. The trial Court was also directed to record a finding whether the said compromise was volunteer or not. Thereafter, the matter was adjourned to enable the learned counsel for the petitioners to CRM No. M 27484 of 2010 2 find out whether there was possibility of compromise with Charanjit Singh and Bhagat Singh as they were the injured and affected persons. Accordingly, Charanjit Singh and Bhagat Singh were impleaded as parties and notice was issued to them. In pursuance to the same, learned counsel appearing for respondents No. 3 and 4 states that the matter has not been compromised and nor are they ready to compromise. In view of the above, the present petition for quashing of the FIR on the basis of compromise is not maintainable. Dismissed. However, in case, the matter is compromised subsequently with respondents No. 3 and 4 as well, the petitioner is at liberty to file afresh. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 04.05.2011 mohan