1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 930 OF 2008 Sou Laila Babulal Mujawar ........Petitioner versus Yasin Mohammad Shaikh ........Respondent. Mr. Yogesh Jadhav i/b V.S. Talkute adv. for the Petitioner. Mr. S.A. Ingavale adv. for the Respondent no.1. Mr. S.R. Shinde APP for State CORAM: B. R. GAVAI, J. DATED : 15th February, 2010. P.C.: 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. 2. The petitioner challenges the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge Sangli dated 28-11-2007 in Criminal Revision Application No. 63/2004 which arose out of the order passed by the learned JMFC in Misc. Application No.214/98. 3. The application filed by the petitioner wife for one time maintenance was allowed by the learned Magistrate thereby awarding the maintenance of Rs. 40,000/-. The revision preferred by the petitioner is also dismissed. Being aggrieved thereby the present petition. 4. Since the matter arises out of matrimonial dispute, this court has referred the matter to Shri S.G.Deshmukh who was 2 appointed to act as a mediator and the mediator has submitted his report dated 4-2-2010 thereby reporting success in the mediation. 5. The parties have agreed that the petitioner would be paid Rs. one lac towards one time maintenance. The Consent Terms are also placed on record. The learned counsel for the respondent states that the additional amount of Rs. 60,000/- has already been paid to the petitioner, This fact is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. The copy of the Consent Terms is taken on record and marked as `X’ for identification. 6. Petition is therefore disposed of in terms of Consent Terms arrived at between the parties. Parties to act on an authenticated copy of this order. (B.R. Gavai, J.)