Criminal Misc. No.M-23741 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.M.No.M-23741 of 2010 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : 29.7.2011 Inderpal Singh PETITIONER VERSUS State of Punjab and others RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Shri B.S.Sudan, Advocate for Ms.P.K.Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri B.B.S.Teji, Senior D.A.G. Punjab. Shri K.S.Kahlon, Advocate for respondent-2. MAHESH GROVER, J. Cr.M.13813 OF 2011 Allowed. Applicant is permitted to be impleaded as respondent No.2 in the present petition. Office is directed to make necessary correction in the memo of parties. Main Case The instant petition has been filed for quashing F.I.R. No.43 dated 19.10.2009 registered under Sections 7,13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 at Police Station Vigilance Bureau, Amritsar. Criminal Misc. No.M-23741 of 2010 -2- This Court had issued notice of motion on 19.8.2010 by noticing the contention which was projected before this Court that the petitioner was the victim of circumstances. A reference was also made to the report Annexure P-3 which was given by the D.S.P. City to show that the shadow witness was not present at the time of alleged raid, but he was present in his office. Another contention which was raised, was that the complainant allegedly stated before the D.S.P. that he had moved an application for regularization of services. It was also contended that the shadow witness had not stated that he was a member of the raiding party to the illegal gratification to be paid to the petitioner. In sum and substance, a plea of false implication has been taken. On due consideration of the matter, I am of the opinion that once the F.I.R. discloses commission of some offence, the contention which requires evaluating the evidence, cannot be looked in the proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Consequently, the petition is dismissed. (MAHESH GROVER) July 29, 2011 JUDGE GD WHETHER TO BE REFERRED TO REPORTER? YES/NO