IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5758 of 2011 1.NANDU RAM AND, SON OF LATE RAMESHWAR RAM. 2. RADHIKA DEVI, WIFE OF NANDU RAM. 3. RAMAYAN RAM, SON OF LATE BALESHWAR RAM. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 3. 24.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Three petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with Obra P.S.Case No. 191/2010 instituted under sections 304 B & 201 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 are father-in-law and mother- in-law respectively of the victim whereas petitioner No. 3 is distant relation of the husband of the victim. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that materials collected in course of investigation indicate that the victim committed suicide by burning herself inside the room. It is submitted that the petitioner No.3 is a distant relation of the husband of the victim and is not concerned with day to day affairs of the family. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on the other hand submits that materials on record indicate that there was some exchange of hot words between the mother-in-law and the victim. It is next submitted that victim died in suspicious circumstances within seven years of marriage and there is 2 allegation of demand of dowry also. Having considered the submissions made on behalf of the parties, this court is not inclined to admit petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 to anticipatory bail. Accordingly, their prayer for anticipatory bail stands rejected. Let the petitioners appear in the court below and pray for bail which shall be considered in accordance with law uninfluenced by the present order. So far petitioner No.3 is concerned, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Daudnagar in connection with Obra P.S. Case No. 191/2010 subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. with further condition that in each case one of the bailers shall be own close family member of the petitioners. Nitesh ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)