IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 7TH OCTOBER 2010 / 15TH ASWINA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 6388 of 2010 -------------------------------------- [CC.NO.9/2004 OF J.F.C.M COURT, MANNARKAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, CRIME NO.170/2003 OF NATTUKAL POLICE STATION] .................... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED: ------------------------------------------- THEKKINTHODI UMMER, S/O. KUNJAMOO, AGED 49 YRS., THEKKINTHODI HOUSE, CHETHALLUR, MANNARKAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.MANSOOR.B.H. RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT/STATE: ------------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTING STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NATTUKAL POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. M.S. BREEZE. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/10/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: prv. V. RAMKUMAR, J. ------------------------------- Bail Application No.6388 of 2010 ------------------------------- DATED: 07.10.2010 O R D E R Petitioner, who is the accused in C.C.No.9/2004 on the file of the J.F.C.M, Mannarkad, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. Admittedly, non-bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioner. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Magistrate and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the Magistrate and files an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of preferably on the same day on which it is filed, notwithstanding the pendency of non-bailable warrants, after considering the explanation offered by the petitioner for his previous non-appearance. With the above observation this application is disposed of . V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. sj