IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.30091 of 2011 Bhushan Sah son of Kishun Sah Versus The State Of Bihar With Cr. Misc. No. 28720 of 2011 Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Singh son of Late Sri Ram Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3/ 17.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 363 and 365 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that one Manish and Ajit were kidnapped by unknown miscreants. Later, Manish was set free but whereabouts of Ajit was not found. During investigation, it transpired that, in fact, Manish himself was involved in the kidnapping of Ajit. Some accused persons, who were apprehended, also confessed. Some witnesses also stated that they had seen the accused persons forcibly making Ajit sit in the BOLERO car whereafter he was not found alive. There is circumstantial evidence also since on the discovery statement of the co-accused Manish, cycle of Ajit was recovered from his uncle’s house. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant bail to petitioners. Prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial in view of the serious nature of the offence. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)