IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.2506 of 2009 Date of decision:15.02.2010. Punjab State and another ...Petitioner Versus Sardool Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Sandeep Moudgil, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Amarjit Markan, Advocate, for the respondents. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. In the context of the facts noticed in the order dated 11.11.2009 passed by a Coordinate Bench (Surya Kant, J.) of this Court, the learned State counsel informs that an appropriate accommodation has since been allotted to the petitioner by the Deputy Commissioner, Amritsar, but that the renovation process is underway and it will take around one month's time before the petitioner can house its office in it. Learned State counsel has produced a communication supportive of the averment aforementioned which is taken on record as Annexure A-1. Learned State counsel, under instructions from Mr. Sangha Ram, District Food and Supply Officer, Amritsar, states that the tenanted premises shall be positively vacated by or on 20.03.2010. That undertaking is accepted by the learned counsel for the respondents. Learned State counsel states that the petitioner shall not make a request for any further extension under any eventuality and further that the possession of the tenanted premises shall be handed over to the respondent on a date duly notified to them in advance. He further states that the arrears of the agreed rent would be cleared within one month from today. In the light thereof, the petition shall stand disposed of. February 15, 2010 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE