1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1479 OF 2005 M/s. Dnyan Sagar Education Society and anr. ... Petitioners Versus The State of Mah. and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Sureshkumar J. Panicker for Petitioner. Ms. Mamta Sudh, A.G.P. for R. Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Mukesh Subramanian for R. No. 3. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : 24TH JULY, 2006 DATE : 24TH JULY, 2006 DATE : 24TH JULY, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Rule. Heard forthwith. . The Petitioner management points out that considering the sanctioned posts, four posts have been reserved for O.B.Cs. The Respondent No. 3 it is pointed out is the 4th candidate and as such it was not open to Respondent to have rejected the application for approval made by the Petitioner for appointment to Respondent No. 3 as Shiksan Sevak. Considering the controversy, we can dispose of the petition by issuing the following directions: (1) The Petitioners within one week from today to make a fresh representation to the Respondent No. 2 pointing out the reservation and the teachers who 2 have been appointed in the post of O.B.C. When such representation is received, Respondent No. 2 to dispose of the same at any rate not latter than three weeks from the date of receipt of the application, if need be after hearing the Petitioner. . With the above observations, Petition disposed of. (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, J.) J.) J.)