IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23514 of 2009 1. MD.JAWAR @ TOOFANI @ JABBAR 2. MD. CHUNWA @ CHAND 3. MD. AURANGZEB 4. MD. BARKU 5. MD. CHHOTKU 6. MD. MOHEWAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 16.09.2009 Heard both sides. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he shall not be pressing this application against petitioner nos. 2, and 3, namely, Md. Chunwa @ Chand and Md. Aurangzeb. Accordingly, the application as against petitioner nos.2 and 3 stands disposed of as not pressed. It is contended that there is already a 107 proceeding going on between the informant and the petitioners. It further appears from the impugned order that due to intervention of the villagers, the parties have come to some settlement. Considering the allegations appearing from the F.I.R. as also the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioners, this court extends the privilege of anticipatory bail to petitioner nos. 1,4, 5 and 6, namely, Md. Jawar @ Toofani @ Jabbar, Md. Barku, Md. Chhotku and Md. Mohewal. Let petitioner nos.1, 4, 5 and 6, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of 04 weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of the CJM, Bhagalpur in connection with Sabour (Lodipur) P.S.Case no. 120/09, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. It is made clear that petitioners must appear and cooperate in the investigation. In case the present case reaches up to the level of framing of charge(s), the petitioners shall appear at the trial as and when called upon by the court below failing which the trial court shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners and secure their arrest in accordance with law. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)