[ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 735 OF 2007 SHRI SHASHIKANT ANKUSH SALGAR ... APPLICANT. VS. THE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA ... RESPONDENTS. MR. V.S.TALKUTE ADVOCATE FOR THEK APPLICANT. MRS. U.V.KEJRIWAL APP FOR THE STATE-RESPONDENT. CORAM CORAM CORAM : : : SRI R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR AND SRI R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR AND SRI R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR AND SRI SRI SRI A.A. A.A. A.A. SAYED, JJ. SAYED, JJ. SAYED, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : January 18, 2008. : January 18, 2008. : January 18, 2008. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. Undisputedly, by earlier Order in criminal application No. 842 of 2005, the application for bail was rejected by speaking order while observing that there are two eye witnesses to the incident, which resulted in fatal injuries to the victim and the applicant was responsible for causing such injuries. The applicant was also not on bail during the trial. Apart from stating that for last 3.1/2 years, the [ 2 ] applicant is in jail no other ground is disclosed for seeking bail. No material which could reveal any substantial change in the circumstances from the time of passing of the last order has been disclosed. In the absence of any such change there is no case made out for entertaining such bail application. Being so, there is absolutely no case for grant of bail at this stage. 3. The application therefore stands rejected. [R.M.S.Khandeparkar,J.] [R.M.S.Khandeparkar,J.] [R.M.S.Khandeparkar,J.] [A.A.Sayed, [A.A.Sayed, [A.A.Sayed, J.] J.] J.]