IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9405 of 2010 1. SHEIKH KALAM 2. Sayyida Khatoon 3. Sheikh Jauaad 4. Sheikh Jamir Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 22.04.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the application of petitioner nos. 1 and 3, inasmuch as during the pendency of this application they have been arrested. Such permission is accorded. Accordingly, the application of petitioner nos. 1 and 3 is dismissed as withdrawn. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner nos. 2 and 4, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant. Petitioners are involved in the case due to being relation of Nausad otherwise informant is not the eye witness. At the first stage, he has submitted to come to know about going of his minor daughter with Nausad with all his family members, at the second stage, he is stating about her going with Nausad and Jamir that also after alluring her and at the third stage, only suspicion is raised against Nausad about his taking away the informant’s girl for the purpose of marriage or sell. If it can make the family members accused then informant is similarly liable for the offence. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioner nos. 2 and 4 is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in 2 connection with Turakaulia P.S. Case No. 14 of 2010 (arising out of Complaint Case No. 17 of 2010), above named petitioner nos. 2 and 4 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., East Champaran at Motihari subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)