IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT APPEAL No. 1843 of 2004 (WRIT APPEAL (SR) No.69759 of 2004) (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 24/06/2004 in WP No : 10376 of 2004 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1. T.Chittaiah, S/o. Late Sri Kotaiah Garu, aged about 74 years, R/o.Raja Bavi Narsingi, Rajendranagar Mandal, R.R. District. 2. Dr.T.V.Janardhana Rao, S/o.Late Sri Kotaiah Garu, R/o.Mahalakshmi Mansion, Rajiv Nagar, Erragadda, Hyderabad. 3. Smt.Paruchuri Nagamani, W/o.Sri P.Mahendra, R/o.Red Hills, Hyderabad. 4. Kum P.Alekhya, D/o.Paruchuri Mahendra, R/o. Red Hills, Hyderabad. 5. P.Sudhakar, S/o.Late Sri P.Koteswara Rao Garu Aged about 32 years, R/o.Kamaan Road, Peddapalli, Karimnagar District. 6. S.V.R.Prasad, S/o.Sri Gangadhara Rao, R/o.Adavinekkalam, Agiripalli Mandal, Krishna District. ..... APPELLANT AND 1. Smt. Tummala Jhani, W/o.T.Venkat Rao, W/o. T.Venkat Rao, R/o.H.No.1-8-506/55/1/E, Prakashnagar Begumpet, Hyderabad rep. by her G.P.A. Syed Nazeer Hussain, S/o.Syed Ghaffar, R/o.H.No.1-8-449/4/1, Pattigadda, Scunderabad. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division at Attapur, Rajendranagar Mandal, R.R.District. 3. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Rajendranagar, Mandal, at Rajendranagar, R.R. District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellants: SRI T.JAGDISH Counsel for the Respondent No.1: MR.A.RAVINDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3: G.P. FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B.Sudershan Reddy) The learned Single Judge merely gave liberty to the respondent-writ petitioner to file application in the prescribed proforma for issuance of Pattadar Pass Book and title deed in her favour and the same has to be considered by the authorities in accordance with law. We fail to appreciate as to how this order in any manner adversely affects the rights of the petitioners-appellants herein in any manner whatsoever. The very direction issued by the learned Single Judge to consider the application to be filed by the respondent-writ petitioner in accordance with law protects the interest of the appellants, if any. The learned Judge never directed the competent authority to straight away issue any pattadar pass book and title deed to the respondent-writ petitioner. It is obvious that an enquiry has to be held for the purpose of considering the request of the respondent-writ petitioner for issuing Pattadar Pass book and title deed in accordance with law. This order in no manner precludes the appellants herein from participating in the proceedings, if they are so interested. With the above clarification, the Writ Appeal is disposed of. _____________________ B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, J. Dated:11-11-2004 _____________________ K.C.BHANU, J. GS To 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division at Attapur, Rajendranagar Mandal, R.R.District. 2. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Rajendranagar, Mandal, at Rajendranagar, R.R. District. 3. Two CCs to the G.P. for Revenue, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT) 4. Two CD Copies.