IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18875 of 2009 RAM PRAKASH PODDAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 13.05.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. From the records of Cr. Misc. No. 46713 of 2008 it is apparent that the order dated 16.12.2008 passed therein suffers from the error of record when it proceeds on the assumption that there was nothing on record with regard to antecedent of the petitioner. It transpires that a supplementary affidavit had been filed on 16.12.2008 itself and was available on record when the application for bail was being considered. In that view of the matter the order dated 6.3.2009 of the Judicial Magistrate, lst Class, Begusarai, in Teghra P.S. Case No. 34 of 2002, requires interference. This application is therefore disposed with the observation that any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner is required to be considered on the day that he surrenders keeping in mind that he was in fact granted anticipatory bail and had fully disclosed his antecedents also when by inadvertence it could not be brought to the attention of the Court at the time of dictation of the order, the allegations being of assault unsupported by fire arm injury with recommendations under Sections 182 and 211 IPC against the informant himself. The order dated 6.3.2009 is therefore set aside in so far as the petitioner is concerned. Snkumar/ (Navin Sinha,J.)