IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45101 of 2008 Rajniti Singh, Son of Kesho Singh, Resident of Village Yodhanbigha, PS Shekhopur, District Shekhpura ---- Petitioner Versus State Of Bihar ---- Opposite Party ----------- 4 3.8.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Court has wrongly closed the prosecution evidence without taking into account the fact that the doctor, who was produced on 25.7.2008 as per Annexure-1, has not been examined in this case. Annexure-1 is a petition filed on behalf of the A.P.P. stating therein that the Medical Officer appeared before the Court but in the absence of the injury report from the original records, no examination could take place. This case has been filed on behalf of the informant. The main complaint of the informant is that the Court has taken no steps for production of the injury report, despite the fact that it has disappeared from the records of the case. The Court should order for reconstruction of the injury report, if possible, and if not, pass an appropriate order in this regard on petition being filed on behalf of the informant with notice to the 2 other side. It goes without saying that if the injury report is reconstructed then the doctor can be issued notice for his examination. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to produce a copy of this order before the Court concerned within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, failing which this application shall stand dismissed. This order is being passed subject to the fact that the case has not been closed. This application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)