;^ ^» a Soma sr PETITIONER/: (Plaintiff) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR Writ Petition (Art. 2271 No.2369 of 2011 Vijay Kumar, aged about 39 years, S/o Shivdani Prasad Sinha, R/o House No.2, Green Valley, Vishal Nagar, Main Road, Telibandha, Raipur, Tahsil and Distt. Raipur RESPONDENT/: Versus Smt. Renu Singh, W/o Ashutosh Gaharwar, (Defendant) R/o House No.37, Aishwarya Residency, Main Road, Telibandha, In front of Minocha Petrol Pump, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) {Writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India} Present: Mr. A.K. Prasad, counsel forthe petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Shrivastava, counsel for the respondent. Single Bench^Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma, J ORAL ORDER (19-7-2011) 1. By this writ petition under Article 227 of the Const'tution of India, the petitioner has challenged legality and propriety of the order dated 15-3-2011 passed by the 7th Additional District Judge, Raipur in Civil Suit No.89A/2009 allowing the application filed on behalf of the respondent herein under Section 151 of the CPC and thereby restraining the petitioner herein from withdrawing the rent deposited by the tenant on the ground that the tenant has not admitted the relationship of landlord & tenant. 2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the order impugned, copy of the plaint, copy of the written statement and other documents. 3. By filing written statement, the respondent herein has denied the relationship of landlord & tenant and also filed application for restraining the petitioner herein from withdrawing rent. Considering the fact that respondent has not admitted the relationship of landlord & tenant and has deposited the rent at the instance of this Court, the order impugned restraining the petitioner from withdrawing rent is not unjust or improper. Consequently, 1 do not find any scope for exercising the supervisory jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. . T Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge