IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND JULY 2009 / 31ST ASHADHA 1931 Mat.Appeal.No. 132 of 2004(E) ---------------------------- OP.103/2003 of FAMILY COURT, KANNUR .................... PETITIONER : APPELLANT/PETITIONER: ------------------------------------ AJITH KUMAR C.K., S/O. C.K.NAIR, AGED 37 YEARS, CHALIL HOUSE, ERUVATTY AMSOM, KOVOR DESOM, THALASSERY TALUK, ERUVATTY P.O., KATHIROOR (VIA), PIN-670 647. BY ADV. SRI.R.SURENDRAN RESPONDENT: 1ST RESPONDENT: ------------------------------ PRASANNA PARAMBATH, D/O. RAIRU VYDYAR, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, PARAMBATH HOUSE, PARAVANTHALA, VATAKARA AMSOM DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK, NUT STREET P.O., VATAKARA - 4. ADV. SMT.K.GIRIJA FOR R1 THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT & M.C.HARIRANI, JJ. * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mat.Appeal No.132 of 2004 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of July 2009 J U D G M E N T BASANT,J This judgment must be read in continuation of the earlier orders dated 25/06/2009 and 06/07/2009. 2. The appellant has not come. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that though the appellant has been informed of the consequences of his non-appearance today, he has not chosen to come to this court. 3. We are satisfied that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting this appeal. 4. This Mat.Appeal is, in these circumstances, dismissed. Though the learned counsel for the appellant submits that the learned counsel for the appellant can proceed to argue the matter, we are satisfied that the consequences of non- appearance of the petitioner must visit this petition. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (M.C.HARIRANI, JUDGE) jsr W.P.Crl/Mat.Appeal No. 2 W.P.Crl/Mat.Appeal No. 3 W.P.Crl/Mat.Appeal No. 4 R.BASANT & M.C.HARIRANI, JJ. .No. of 200 ORDER/JUDGMENT 18/06/2009