1 wp10355.11.sxw ssm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10355 OF 2011 Monali Madhusudan Patil ....Petitioner. Vs. The Municipal Commissioner, Brihan Mumbai Municipal Corporation & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. Krishna N. Kore for the Petitioner. Mr. S.S. Pable for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM :- D.K DESHMUKH AND ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE :- 15 DECEMBER, 2011. P.C. :- Admittedly, the Petitioner’s certificate, copy of which is at Exhibit “A”, did not have any date. Therefore, during the selection process due to the defective certificate, the Petitioner was not selected. Now, the selection process is over. Expectations have been created in the persons whose names are in the select list. In our opinion, therefore, at this stage, though there is clarification issued by the Tahasildar as to the date on which that certificate was issued, it will 2 wp10355.11.sxw ssm not be appropriate to disturb the select list. 2 The Petition is rejected. There shall be no order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)