^ ^^ • \QO l BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.l WRITPETITION (Cl N0. ^3 2^ / 2011 PETJTIONER ^" .. ,1: ^.•^>p ^^•;.--"". .'^^^•^^? ^•^^"...."•^ -^\^' ^' ^^,^'' RESPONDENTS ..-:^—s%&; yy ^ ^ v Santosh Kumar Agrawal, S/o. Shri Ramdhari, Aged about 45 years, R/o Lailunga, District, Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2.NagarPanchayat, Lailunga, District - Raigarh, (C.G.) 3. Collector, Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CQNSITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WMT PETmON (C) No. 7326 of2011 Santosh Kumar Agrawal. RESPONDENTS VER8US State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUnON OF INDIA SB: Hon'Me Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Sourabh Dangi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No. 1 and 3. Shri Amn Sao, Advocate for the respondent No. 2. ORDER (Passed on 07th day ofDecember, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submite that the impugned notice dated 25.11.2011 (Annexure P/l), for demolition of the alleged unauthorized constmction raised by the petitioner, has been withdrawn by the respondent authorities. Thus, nothmg survives for adjudication and this petition has become infructuous. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side do not controvert the above submission. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become mfi-uctuous. — Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit