HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Cx.M.P. No. 57/2011 PETITIONERS: 1. Laxmi Naxayan Sahu, aged about 38 years, son of Lats Shn' Guharam. Sukun @ Sagun .Bai @ Shakuntala Sahu, aged about 65 yeaxs, Wife of Lats Shn‘ Guharam. Laxmi Bai Sahu, aged about 39 years, daughter of Late Shri Guha Ram. 4. Motilal Sahu, aged about 48 years, son of Nandlal Sahu. Smt. Puni Bai Sahu, aged about 45 years, wife of Shn' Motilal. 6. Smt. Bhagwati Sahu, aged about 45 years, wife of Shri Janakram Sahu. A11 belongs to caste Sahu, residence of Purani Basti Rani Road, Korba, Police Station City Kotwali, Korba, Distn'ct Korba, Chhattisgarh. gl Versus W: 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Police Station City KotwaJi, District Korba, Chhattisgarh. Smt. Krishna Sahu, aged about 22 years, wife of Shri Laxmi Narayan Sahu, residence of Purani Basti, Koba, Police Station City Kotwaii, Korba, Tahsil and District Korba, Presently residing at Hasaud, Police Station Hasaud Chowki, Police Station Jaijaipur, District Janjgir—Champa', Chhattisgarh, MEMO OF PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE. ‘ (SB :I-Ion’ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, JJ Present:— Shri C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Sumit Jhanwar, P.L. for the State] respondent No. 1. Respondent No. 2 not noticed. ORAL- ORDER (Passed on 08/02/201 1) 1. B this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short ‘the Code’) petitioners have prayed for quashment of the criminal proceeding pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Korba District Korba (C.G.) in criminal case No. 1656/ 10 for the offence punishable under Sections 498‘A/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code. y 2» Shn' C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate for the petitioners and Shn' Sumit Jhanwar, P.L. for the State] respondent No. 1 are heard. 3. Copy of the charge—sheet and copy of the order taking cognizance perused . 4. As per copy of First Information Report husband of bride, sister-invlaw (Nancmd), mother—in-law, maternal uncle—in-law Motilal have committed torture and cruelty in connection with the demand of dowry and mother— in-law has compelled her for living her matrimonial house at odd time at night. 5. In order to quash the criminal proceeding petitioners are required to Show that if allegation made in complaint or material collected on behalf of the prosecution is even admitted in its face value then the conviction of the petitioners would not be possible. r x [6. In the preeent caSe if allegation made in First Information Report is admitted in its face value then same would be suiticient for conviction of the petitioners. In these circumstances in continuance of criminal proceeding would not be abuse of process of the Court. I do not iind any ground for interference in exercise of extraordinary inherentjun'sdiction in terms of Section 482 of the Code. Consequently, petition is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. Sdl- T.P. Sharma Judge 7. Other interim applications are also dismissed.