1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION S.C.SUIT NO.1825 OF 1990 M.T.N.Limited ..Plaintiffs. V/s. M/s.Neon Trading Corporation ..Defendants. Mr.S.R.Rajguru for Plaintiffs. Mr.R.L.Dharia for Defendants. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : NOVEMBER 2, 2007. DATE : NOVEMBER 2, 2007. DATE : NOVEMBER 2, 2007. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Counsel for the Plaintiffs states that instructions have been received that entire telephone demand bill has been paid by the Defendants. In the circumstances, the Suit is allowed to be withdrawn unconditionally. Refund as per rule. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J)