1 WP 1271....2010 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1271 OF 2010 Mr. A.K.Tiwari ,Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. A.K.Gugle, Advocate holding for Mr. H.A. Joshi, Advocate for the respondent. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3817 OF 2010 Mr. A.K.Gugle, Advocate holding for Mr. H.A. Joshi, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. A.K.Tiwari ,Advocate for the Respondent. ................................... Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 06/06/2011 PER COURT : 1. The present petitions are filed aggrieved by the Order dated 19/12/2009 passed by the District Judge – 4, Aurangabad in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 253 of 2009. 2 WP 1271....2010 2. During the pendency of the present Writ Petition, both the parties had filed undertaking in this Court, wherein the petitioners in Writ Petition No. 1271 of 2010 had agreed to pay Rs. 5,00,000/- ( Rupees Five Lacs only ) to the respondents in the said Writ Petition and the respondents had agreed to execute the legal documents in favour of the petitioners, so also had undertaken that they would not cause obstruction to the peaceful enjoyment of the suit property by the petitioners of Writ Petition No. 1271 of 2010. 3. Mr. Gugle, the learned counsel for the respondents in Writ Petition No. 1271 of 2010 fairly concedes that the respondents have received an amount of Rs. 5,00,000/- ( Rupees Five Lacs only ) and that the petitioners are in possession of the suit shop and that the respondents in Writ Petition No. 1271 of 2010 are ready to execute the legal documents required for the purpose. 4. In view of the fact that the respondents agrees that the petitioners in Writ Petition No. 1271 of 2010 are in possession of the suit shop and that they have received Rs. 5,00,000/- ( Rupees Five Lacs only ) and they are ready to execute the legal documents required for the purpose, I do not find any impediment to dispose of the Writ 3 WP 1271....2010 Petitions in view of the said undertaking filed in the Court. Mr. Gugle, the learned counsel for the respondents in Writ Petition No. 1271 of 2010 has assured that the respondents would execute the legal document in favour of the petitioners as is required by law. The same is the matter interse between the parties. In view of the undertaking filed, the impugned order would not survive. 5. The present Writ Petitions are as such disposed of in view of the undertaking verified on 24/3/2011. No costs. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J. ] KNP/WP 1271....2010