IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO. 19 OF 2008 NO. 19 OF 2008 NO. 19 OF 2008 IN IN IN NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2564 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO. 2564 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO. 2564 OF 2007 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 1907 OF 2007 NO. 1907 OF 2007 NO. 1907 OF 2007 1. Nafisa Afroz Alam & ors. ] .. Appellants (Org.Defendants) Versus 1.Gopal P. Mavani & anr. ] .. Respondents (Org.Plaintiffs) Mr. Arif Y. Bookwala, senior counsel i/b Joseph Fernandes for the appellants. Mr. Jayesh Bhatt for the respondents. CORAM: S.B. MHASE & R.V. MORE, JJ. DATED: 27TH AUGUST, 2008 P.C. : 1. The parties have tendered in court today, Consent Minutes of Order. We find that out of three appellants, two appellants viz. appellants No.2 and 3 have signed the said Minutes and the appellant No.2, who is the constituted attorney of appellant No.1, has signed it on behalf of appellant No.1. Thus, all the appellants have signed the said Consent Minutes of the Order. So far as the respondents are concerned, respondents No.1 and 2 are husband and wife. The : 2 : respondent No.1 has signed it for himself and also for his wife under special authority. The Advocate for the respondents has also signed the Minutes on behalf of the respondent No.1 and under special authority for the respondent No.2. 2. Thus, we find that the Minutes of the Order have been drawn with the consent of all the parties and the parties have voluntarily signed the said Minutes. 3. We accept the said Consent Minutes of Order. The Consent Minutes of Order are taken on record and marked "X" for identification purposes. The Appeal, accordingly, stands disposed of in terms of the Consent Minutes of Order. Sd/- Sd/- [R.V. [R.V. [R.V. MORE, J.] MORE, J.] MORE, J.] [S.B. [S.B. [S.B. MHASE, J.] MHASE, J.] MHASE, J.]