BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Ninth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S. TAMILVANAN CRL OP(MD) No.15976 of 2011 1 SENTHULKUMAR 2 PANDI 3 BALAJI @ VENKATESH ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 3 Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AMBATHURAI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT CR.NO. 496/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.M.KARTHIKEYA Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Addl.Public Prosecutor(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/A1 to A3 as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent. 2.The petitioners/A1 to A3 apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 341 and 506(ii) I.P.C., in Crime No.496 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police, have come forward with the application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., seeking anticipatory bail. 3.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that no injury was sustained by the defacto complainant and there is no bad antecedents against the petitioners and they are innocent persons and hence, he prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. 4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent has not disputed the fact that there is no bad antecedents against the petitioners there is a case and counter case pending between the petitioners and the defacto complainant. Admittedly, no injury was sustained by the defacto complainant or any other persons in the occurrence. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that there is no bad antecedents against the petitioners and no injury was sustained by the defacto complainant, I find it just and reasonable to grant anticipatory bail to the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioners on the following conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest, on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Dindigul and on further condition that the first petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required and the second petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed. Sd/- 09/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III DINDIGUL 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AMBATHURAI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DIST 3 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.M.KARTHIKEYA Advocate SR.No.43050 ssk/14.12.2011 /5c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15976 of 2011 Date :09/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/