^ ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIfiH COURT OF CHHATnS6ARH AT BILASPUR W.P. rsr NO. /2011 PETCTIONER ^r'o^ ....•• ^-^ ^?^' RESPONDENTS ^. Bhagirathi Jangade, S/o Shri Sukhiram Jangade, aged about 53 years, Lecturer, 6ovt. Boys Higher Secondary School, Hardi Bazar. Block-Pali, District- Korba (C.6.). VERSUS ^ : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, Tribal Welfare bepartment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) 2. Assistant Commissioner. Tribal Welfare Department, Korba. Distt.- Korba (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Pali, Block-Pali, Distt.-Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNbER ARTCCLE 226 OF THE CONSTCTUTION OF INDIA ^rRTCh •HT^^T vr ^~ST ^i<4ld<4, ^nl^^Ko, [^<ni<-jy ._.....U£&1.Z5.^/>i WHCIF ^HI^ ^/ 200 •^^8T" chl^fd<lflrl ^i^aT'^fe^t <p3i<^i< ^ 3T}^R 3?T^T SB ; IHon'ble Shri Maaindra Nohan Shrivs»tava,J.I 1^5.2011 ^ Shri A.S. Rajput, counse for the petitioner. Lawyer for the Shri A. V. Shridl^ar, Panel State/respondents, on advanc^ copy. Heard on admission. Leamed counsel appear|ng for fhe petitioner submits fhat the petitioner is entitled to be^iefit of two advance increments on account of he havtng pass^d B.Ed. examination before his appointment at his own coslfc. It is submitted ttiat fhe issue involved in fhe present petitic| same has been fmally decided| the case of jAsfca iSax»TO<a os.j SSPJR fsa 59. It is further submitted similar view in its order |n is no longer res integra and fhe by fhe Hon'ble Supi^me Court in Stccte of M.P. & <^*s., 2009 ffZD !that fhis Court has also taken a dated 06-02-2009 passed in W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. L^amed counsel fbr tlie petitioner furttier draws attention of fhii Coiirt to order dated 29-04-2010 .1 -„„ passed tn Writ Appeal No. 124;of 2009, wherein relying upon fhe judgment of the Supreme C(?urt in fhe case of Aslia Saacena [suprc^ and the order passed by tliis Court in anotlier Writ Appeal \ •"•• \ \ [Tfl- / ^i "%... %,-HC-22 3TT^T^T ^w^ ^^\ 5h^ich 'yf^a Prayeen ^~^[ r^l^l^q^ ^-al^^Ko, ^<ni<-l^< 3T?^r ^ra^ 'WT^TT'^ira? *'***'*'******* *******"*TF^ ^^ '^^T' ^ST^T'^H^R: ^n - L- b^en No.87/2009, directions have case for grant of two advance| 21-09-1974 issued by the verification ofthe facts pleaded) Leamed counsel for the petitioner would also be In view of the finally disposed off wifti a to consider and decide the advance increments as per fhe State of Madhya Prades|i, pleaded in the petition, within date of receipt of copy of fhis oitder. issued for consideration of fhe |increments as per circular dated $tate of Madhya Pradesh, affcer |in fhe petition. submits tfaat case of coijisidered on the same lines. fhe| respondents statem^nt cM^<fll 'RTH^ff ^ fi1cst <f^l^!< '^)'3rf;OT3Tr^T made above, fhis petition is dire(]:tion to the respondent aufhorities of the petitioner for grant of two cir^ular dated 21-09-1974 issued by after verification of the facts |a period of fhree monfhs from the Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^,f:,,,