IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS LETTERS LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 8 OF 1991 PATENT APPEAL NO. 8 OF 1991 PATENT APPEAL NO. 8 OF 1991 IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO. 866 OF 1987 APPEAL NO. 866 OF 1987 APPEAL NO. 866 OF 1987 Alampallam Seshadri Paman ] .. Appellant (Ori.Petitioner) Versus Smt. Radha daughter of L.S.Venkateshwar] .. Respondent (Ori.Respondent) None for the appellant. CORAM: R.M. LODHA & S.J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATED: 03RD JULY, 2006 P.C. : . On 5th July, 2006 we passed the following order: "The advocate for the appellant undertakes to file synopsis within two weeks from today. He also submits that the other objection raised by the office that the paging does not tally with the index shall also be removed within two weeks. 2. We accept his statement. As the appeal is of the year 1991, we direct the office to post the appeal for final hearing after two weeks." 2. The office has reported that the Advocate for the appellant has not removed office objection i.e. : 2 : paging does not tally with the index. As regards synopsis, it is stated that it is not filed within the stipulated period as per the order dated 5th July, 2006. 3. We now direct the appellant to remove office objections within 2 weeks from today, failing which Letters Patent Appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to Court. If compliance is made in time, office is directed to post the Appeal for final hearing immediately thereafter. Sd/- [R.M. [R.M. [R.M. LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] Sd/- [S.J. [S.J. [S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.] VAZIFDAR, J.] VAZIFDAR, J.]