IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 3105 of 2011 Date of decision: 10.5.2011 Mrs.Roshan Gupta and another … Petitioners versus Balwinder Singh and another … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mr. S.S.Walia, Advocate for the petitioners ... ARVIND KUMAR, J: The present petitioners are aggrieved with order dated 15.3.2011 passed by the District Judge, Ludhiana, by virtue of which their application for transferring both the suits, titled as Balwinder Singh and another v. Mrs. Roshan Gupta and another and the other titled as Sushil Aggarwal v. Balwinder Singh and others, to one Court has been dismissed. Heard. Counsel for the petitioners contends that the main ground for dismissal of the application is that the suit properties in both the suits are located at different places which is not the subject matter of the said suits. The said suits are between the parties, their predecessors and successors-in- interest and the subject-matter is the dissolution-deed and memorandum of understanding dated 18.5.2000 which has not been discussed by the Court below while dismissing the application. A perusal of the plaints of both the suits and the arguments that have been addressed indicates that in both the suits, the applicability and validity of the dissolution-deed and the memorandum of understanding is to be determined, which has not been discussed by the learned District Judge. In view of this, the revision petition is allowed, impugned order is set aside and the case is remitted back to the Court concerned to decide the application of the petitioners afresh in C.R. No. 3105 of 2011 -2- accordance with law without being influenced by any of the observations made herein. May 10, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) JS JUDGE