(^ HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BSLASPUR Singie Bench: Appeilant Claimant Hon'bie Shri Diiip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. M.A.CNo. 483 of 2006 Santosh Kumar Yadav, S/o Shri Babuia! Yadav, aged about 30 years, R/o Dabhara Shankar Nagar, Poiice Station Bhilai-3, Distt. Durg (CG) Versus Respondents 1 Rajeshwar, S/o Chatur Singh, aged about 27 years, R/o Village Devbaioda, District Durg (CG) Driver 2. The Branch Manager, Nationa! Insurance Company Ltd. Distt. Durg (CG) Insurer 3. Ajay Agrawal, S/o Shambhu Agrawai, R/o Shaiiendra Nagar, RaJpur(CG) Owner 4. Abdul Shakeei, S/o Abdui Aziz, R/o Devbaioda, Police Station Bhilai-3, Distt. Durg (CG) Owner JViemo of IViisc. ApDeal (C) under Section 173 ofthe MotorVehicSes Act 1988. Present: Shri Jitendra Gupta, counsei for the appeiiant. Shri N.K. Agrawai. Senior Advocate with Shri Qamrui Aziz, counsei for the respondent No.2. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 29th day of July. 2008) Heard finally. (2) The appeiiant is aggrieved by an order dated 30/06/2006 passed by the Vli!lh Addltjonal Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (FTC) Distt. Durg in claims case No.311/2005, whereby in an injury case, compensatlon of Rs.3,500/- was awarded by the Tribunai. (3) During the hearing of this appeal, learned counsei for the appeilant was not able to make out any ground for enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Tribunai in as much as it is not disputed by learned counsei for the appellant that the oniy injury suffered by the ^;,.;.. ^. Priya appeilant/claimant in the accident was a lacerated wound in the right thumb. The said injury was a simple injury. Medical evidence was not adduced by the claimant. So far as the documents relating to the C.T. scan of the head of the appetlant/claimant and the expenses incurred thereunder are concerned, no nexus with the accident is shown by the learned counsel. In the injury report Ex.P"6 afso, there is no mention of anyhead injury. (4) The appeai being devoid of any merit is dismissed. Sd/- DilipRaosahebDeshmukh Judge