__ h... .'e .. T.V‘.At‘_ ; . WJ’ {g1 No 67§8£2Q0§ (f‘éTlTIon m Under . fU‘TlCIe A ... 44¢ aa.’ 01" r.. Wle GO?!STI‘FLITlOlQ a OT ,v lnma) ‘.\ PMI‘l-ioner Udaya Sahakari Grih Nirman Sansfha Maryadi‘r, fhroug’n- President Office a? Udayn Nagar, Tafibmdh, Ra§pur, Dis-:‘ricf Raipur (C6) Vs - Resgandems 1. The 5mm of Chhaffisgarh, ‘rhrough 5ecre‘rur'y, Depari’men? of Co-oper'a‘i'ive Societies, D.K.5. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2. The Regis‘l‘rar, Co-opem'rive Socieh'es, pi). Eaipur, Disi'ric'i' Eaipur {C6} Tf.‘ i “5 Depu‘ry' RagésWaP, Ca—o erafiva Socie‘ries, Raipum Disfr'icf Roipur- (CG) k.. . 5hri SP. Kosaria, Inquiry Officer- cum Samar Caopemfive Inspecfor, Raépur (CG) : For The pefifionzr. For responden‘? N051 fa 3 ORAL ORDER {Passed an 19”“ Novembem 2009) 1. Hear-d. 2. The pe‘l’ifioner hoe fiied ‘rhis pefifion and prayed for quoshing of ‘rhe orders of Annexure P—1 5g P—2 whergby The ge‘ri‘rioner's uppiicafion of Annexur‘e P-12 has been finally rejected by fhe au’r'norifies below. . Mr. Prosod; learned counses‘ for fhe ge'iifioner submi‘rs fhai‘ a supercession proceeding of The pe‘h’fioner sociefy under Section 53 of The C.6.’§ocie?ies ACT; 1960 (for shot"? ‘The Ac‘r‘)‘is going on before 'rhe Join? Regis‘rmr; Co-opem‘rive $ocie‘ries; Reipur. ‘ The aforesaid proceeding hos been iniiiafed on The basis of reporf submi‘rfed by The Enquiry Officer; however; The documen'rs on which fhe aforesaid enquiry repor‘r is hosed have nof been ramvided To The pe'ri'rioner and The pe‘iifioner’s opplica‘i‘ion of Annexure P-12 hos been rejecfed summoriiy on uni-enable grounds. Presem": Mr. AK. Prosod. Advoco're Mr. 5. Eojoj, éov‘r. Advoca‘re ‘M\4W. ‘31 f Page 2 . On The o‘rher hand, Mr. Bajaj, learned counsel for The Smfe submi‘rs fhaf the documenfs requesfed by fhe pai'rioner- have been refused on fhe grounds fhaT The same were nof maintained and since The examina‘rion—in-chief of 'i’he Enquiry Officer has noT been recorded by The JoinT RegisTrar; Therefore; quesTion of his cross-examinaTion does noT arise. He furTher submiTs ThaT if The peTiTioner fiies any applicaTion for providing documenTs on which The enquiry is going on; The same may be provided To The peTiTioner in accordance wiTh The provisions of SecTion 53 of The ACT. . In view of above submission; noThing survives in This peTiTion and accordingiyi iT is disposed of. ¢ KR . CerTified copy as per ruies. i Sd/- Dhirendra Misi’n‘jai‘ Judge