IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.2117 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 16th July, 2010 Sukhi Ram … Petitioner Versus Balbir Singh and others … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Arun Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Khurana, Advocate for the respondents. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the petitioner states that it has been wrongly stated in the impugned order that the petitioner was associated when demarcation of Khasra No.101 was undertaken. Learned counsel submits that the demarcation carried out is bad and cannot bind the petitioner, especially when there is a serious dispute between the parties and the same was carried at the back of the petitioner. Learned counsel further states that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay the cost to the revenue authorities for carrying demarcation. It is further stated that the petitioner is also ready and willing to compensate the respondent in monetary terms. After hearing counsel for the petitioner, present revision petition is hereby disposed of by giving following directions: Civil Revision No.2117 of 2010 (O&M) (a) That the revenue authorities shall demarcate Khasra No.101 by carrying out a fresh demarcation in the presence of both the parties by giving them a notice in advance. (b) That for the demarcation to be undertaken by the revenue authorities, the petitioner shall deposit an amount of Rs.10,000/- in the Treasury under the concerned head, after obtaining necessary orders from the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Rewari. (c) The petitioner shall also deposit another amount of Rs.10,000/- as a cost in the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Rewari, to be disbursed to the respondents. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE July 16, 2010 rps 2