IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3054 of 2011 Jitesh Kumar @ Laddu son of Vijay Prasad Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3. 20.7.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence u/ss.364 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 5.4.2010 vide Cr.Misc.No.1930 of 2010 since he had helped in disposing of the goods which were loaded on the looted truck. In paragraph 53 of the case diary it has been stated that the tyres were recovered on the joint pointing out of the petitioner and the co-accused further substantiating that the petitioner was involved in the present case. In view of such, I am not inclined to review the earlier order. The prayer for bail is once again rejected with a direction to the Trial Court to expedite the trial. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )