-1- IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY AND AND AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION INTESTATE JURISDICTION INTESTATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS MISCELLANEOUS MISCELLANEOUS PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.51 OF 2006 NO.51 OF 2006 NO.51 OF 2006 IN IN IN TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.516 OF 1988 NO.516 OF 1988 NO.516 OF 1988 Fali Dadi Palkhivala and anr. ...Petitioners v/s State Bank of India and anr. ...Respondents Mr Manoj Dalvi i/b M/s Banatwala and Co. for Petitioners. None for Respondents. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH J. DATE : 21ST DECEMBER 2006. -2- P.C. :- 1. The learned counsel appearing for petitioners states that the respondents have been served, he has filed affidavit of service. None appears for the respondents, they have not filed any reply. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. In the absence of any reply, accepting the averments made in the petition at their face value, the petition is granted in terms of prayer clause (a). Four weeks’ time is fixed. Petition is also granted in terms of prayer clause (b). Six weeks’ time is fixed. Petition is disposed off. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary as true copy. . Certified copy expedited.