IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CWP No. 19707 of 2009 Date of decision: 09.09.2011 Hardei ........ Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Surinder Singh Walia, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Anjum Ahmad, All. A.G. Haryana for the respondent State Mr. Jaswant Jain, Advocate for respondent No. 4 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that all the retiral benefits have already been released to the petitioner and accordingly, the present writ petition is rendered infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 09.09.2011 mohan