IN THE HIGH COURTOfe®3 •3, W^S.M.C.C. <?15 /0<^5 ADDlication arisina from order passed bv Hon,ble Justice Mr. Satish K. Aanihotri in W.P..S. NorB71/05 Smt. ^ Savitri Devi vs. State of Madhyapradesh & others on i ^710/09 2-0 lt ^ f APPLICANT ^^i^ ?'1>^. %?>•^ uft' •^^s^ ^•^^ ^mt. Savitridevi W/0 Late Shahdeoprasad Tiwari aged 72 years R/0 Village Kheda Post Gidha,Tahsil Mungeli Disst. Bilaspur (C.G.) ^^ ItESPONDENTS VERSES. (*A&A.l\^.c; S<s<^^4\ vL—-? State of GJihattisgafh Through Secretary Panchayat and Samaj Sevd D.K.S.Bhawon' RQ+PW-(C^.) •- ^^ ^ ^ -<?' ^VVOPOL^ f^ 2,. District Adult Education officer «y/ Bilaspur. $, Chief Account officer (Pension) RevenueDepartment(Controller) Weights and Measurement Hosarigabad Road Bhopal. t. A£countantGeneral M.P. Gwalior. ^ V-]—^-i- -—.— /<r /^'^ I y?'^es?~-y^t. 9 ^ '-'Sssaftf v HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Applicant Non-Applicants M.C.C. No.615of2011 Smt. Savitridevi VERSUS State ofMadhya Pradesh & others APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF THE WRIT PETITION SBLHon'ble ShrLSatish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Avmash Mishra, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Arun Sao. Govt. Advocate for the State. 1. 2. 3. ORDER >th (Passed on 19m day of September, 2011) I.A.NO. 1. Gowri This is an application for condonation of delay in filing restoration application. Sufficient cause has been shown. No objection from other side. Thus, delay is condoned, subject to payment ofa sum ofRs.1,500/- to the High Court Legal Aid Committee. Leamed counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the counsel for the applicant could not appear on account of bona flde mistake, therefore, W.P. (S) No.871 of 2005, which was dismissed on 23-10-2009, may be restored to its file. Reasonable and sufficient cause has been shown. W.P. (S) No.871 of 2005 is restored to the original file. A copy ofthis order.be placed on record oforiginal writ petition and the same be listed for hearing. ____- SatishK.AS"alom Judge