IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 15470 of 2009 Between: B.Basava Raju, S/o. Mallanna, S.G.Teacher (M), APSWREI Society (now under transfer), Dhone, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 A.P. Social Welfare Residential Educational Institutions Society, Hyderabad, Rep by its Secretary, DSS Bhavan, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 2 The Principal, APSWR School (G) Dhone, Kurnool District. 3 Sm.t S.Firdose Anjum, A.P.S.W.R.School (G), Dhone, Kurnool District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction especially one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring that Proceedingsin R.C.No.Estt/A/90/2009, dt. 14-7-2009 of the 2nd respondent and the proceedings issued in R.c.No.CO.II/Z-IV/4696/2009, Dt. 16-7-2009 of the 1st respondent are illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory violative article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and further declare that petitioner is entitled to continue as PG Teacher (Maths), APSWRS/JC Dhone, Kurnool District. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.SURENDER RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.K.DURGA PRASAD The Court made the following : HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.15470 of 2009 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 14.07.2009 thereby transferring the petitioner from APSWRS/J.C., Dhone, Kurnool District to APSWRS/J.C. Ramapuram, Kadapa District is arbitrary and illegal. Various contentions have been raised by the petitioner including that the impugned transfer is contrary to clause 13 of the guidelines issued under G.O.Ms.No.470 dated 26.06.2009, which specifically provides for preferential categories on medical grounds. It is the case of the petitioner that his wife is suffering from cancer and she is under treatment at Kurnool. It is also stated that the petitioner is suffering from chronic Pancreatitis. Thus it is contended that the petitioner’s case ought to have been considered under clause 13 of the guidelines and he ought to have been posted in any one of the places opted by him. As the objections raised by the petitioner require consideration by the respondents in accordance with law, the petitioner is permitted to make an appropriate representation ventilating his grievances. If any such representation is made, the same shall be considered and appropriate orders be passed by the respondents 1 and 2 in accordance with the guidelines under G.O.Ms.No.470 dated 26.06.2009 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of such application. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI,J Date: 12-08-2009 Note: issue C.C. by Monday. B/o KLP