IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE FRIDAY, THE 8TH DECEMBER 2006 / 17TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 WP(C).No. 32709 of 2006(R) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ P. MOHANDAS, S/O.PACHAN, H.C.3717, AR. CAMP, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KERALA STATE, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, POLICE HEADQUARTERS, KOLLAM. 3. B. VIJAYAN PILLAI, ASSISTANT SUB INSPECTOR, AR CAMP, PULIMKUDDY, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. K. VIJAYAKUMAR, ASSISTANT SUB INSPECTOR AR CAMP, KOLLAM. BY G.P. SRI.P.NANDAKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, J. ---------------------------------- W.P.(C)NO. 32709 of 2006 ---------------------------------- Dated this 8th day of December, 2006 JUDGMENT I do not propose to examine the genuinenesses of the grievance voiced by the petitioner that his juniors (respondents 3 and 4) have been given promotion overlooking him. But since Ext.P5 has been submitted by the petitioner before the 2nd respondent, it is only appropriate that the 2nd respondent takes a decision on Ext.P5. This writ petition, accordingly, will stand disposed of with the following directions: The 2nd respondent will take up Ext.P5, hear the petitioner and also respondents 3 and 4 and take a correct and just decision on the same at his earliest an at any rate within two months of the petitioner producing a copy of this judgment together with copies of those documents upon which the petitioner wants the 2nd respondent to rely. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE Judge dpk