IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE: 28.06.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.12796 of 2006 C.S.Asha Chithra .. Petitioner. Versus 1.The State of Tamil Nadu rep. By the Secretary (Home) Police Fort St. George, Chennai – 9. 2.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, No.807, Anna Salai, Second Floor, Chennai – 2. .. Respondents. Prayer: Petition filed seeking for a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for appointment to the post of Woman Sub-Inspector, along with others in pursuant to Notification No.Na.Ka.A1/4500/2001, and to extend all benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.L.Chandrakumar For Respondents: Mr.N.Sakthivel Government Advocate O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, a counter affidavit had been filed on behalf of the respondents. Paragraph Nos.5 and 6 of the said counter affidavit reads as follows: "5. It is submitted that this respondents after verification of her application and certificates filed by the petitioner along with the application called the petitioner for Physical Fitness test. She was qualified in the said test as she had scored 5 marks and she was called for the Written Test. This petitioner secured 35 marks in the Written Test. As https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ she got qualified in the Written Test she was called for viva voce in which she secured 6.25 and in total she secured 46.25 marks, against the cut off marks of 50.00 for BC Community to which she belongs. Hence she was not selected. 6. It is submitted that reservation for the wards of the Police and Ministerial staff of Police Department during the above recruitment could not be made as a case was filed by one M.Senthil Kumar which was pending in Hon'ble Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal and later in this Hon'ble High Court. No candidate was then selected under 10% reserved quota for wards." 3. In view of the statements made in the said paragraphs that no candidate had been selected under 10% reserved quota for wards, this Court finds it appropriate to dismiss the writ petition. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed. No cost. cse Sd/- Asst. Registrar //True Copy// Sub Asst. Registrar To 1.The Secretary (Home) Police State of Tamil Nadu Fort St. George, Chennai – 9. 2.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, No.807, Anna Salai, Second Floor, Chennai – 2. + 1 cc to Government Pleader, SR No.37835 + 1 cc to Mr. L. Chandrakumar, Advocate SR No.37633 JP(CO) SR/15.7.2011 Writ Petition No.12796 of 2006 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/