IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9530 of 2011 ASHOK KUMAR & ORS Versus MOST.SHARDA DEVI & ORS ----------- 02. 22.06.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. This writ application has been filed for setting aside the order dated 14.03.2011 passed by learned Sub Judge III, Khagaria in Title Suit No.102 of 1986 whereby the learned Court below has allowed the amendment of the written statement filed by the respondents. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the learned Court below found that there is typing mistake in the date of the registered sale deeds which have been exhibited in the case. Therefore, instead of the date of sale deed dated 27.09.1954 has been allowed to be amended as 27.02.1954 and likewise, the date of sale deed dated 11.09.1989 has been allowed to be amended as 11.09.1987. The learned Court below also found that it is typing error only and, therefore, no prejudice is caused to any party. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, I find no reason to interfere with the impugned order and accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. Saurabh ( Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.)