IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 11335/2008 Decided on:23.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Kamlesh Kumar. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. M.C. Verma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Ansul Bansal, Addl. A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Rajesh Verma, Advocate for respondent No.3. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). It is evident from the pleadings that no final decision has been taken on the issue till date. It has come in the supplementary affidavit of respondent No.3 that as per Annexure R-4, clarification was sought from the respondent- State but, as yet, no reply has been received despite the reminder issued on 25.8.2006. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-State to take a final decision on Annexure R-4 dated 23.12.2004 and reminder dated 25.8.2006, within a period of two months, from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment, by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 23.12.2010 *awasthi*