IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SUNDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 11589 of 2007 Between: Nakki Reddy Ramchandhra Reddy S/o Rajaiah R/o Kuntapally Village, Sangem mandal, Warangal District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of India rep by the Deputy Secretary, Ministry of Home Office (Freedom Fighter Division) Locknayak Bhavan, Khan Market, New Delhi. 2 Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaringthe impugned proceedings issued bythe 1st respondent in his proceedings No. 112/8390/97-FF(HC), dt 24-4-2007 as illegal, void and abinitio and further direct the 1st Respondent that petitioner is entitled to the grant of relief of pension under Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1980 and consequently driectthe 1st respondent to grant pensionfrom 23-12-2004 and to pass such other order or orders that the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper inthe circumstances of the case, inthe interest of justice./ Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.RAVINDER Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.11589 of 2007 ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a Mandamus declaring the impugned proceedings issued by the first respondent dated 24.4.2007 as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the first respondent to grant pension to the petitioner from 23.12.2004. There is no necessity of going into all the details. The learned counsel on either side fairly conceded that the issue that arises for consideration in this writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in W.P.Nos.22087 and 8880 of 2006 dated 31.10.2007, therefore this writ petition is also liable to be disposed of in terms of the said judgment. In view of the same, following the above judgment, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to reconsider the whole issue in the light of the decision specified therein and take a decision at an earliest point of time, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioner. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. ____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 1.4.2009 DA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.11589 of 2007 1.4.2009