IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 5129 of 2008 Between: 1 Yerragudi Shanthamma W/o Shiva Reddy R/o Pothuvandlapalli H/o Rowthukunta Village, Sambepalli andal, kadapa District. 2 V. Naramma W/o Reddanna R/o Kesapuram Village, Chinnamandyam Mandal, kadapa District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Government of andhra Pradesh, rep by District Collector, kadapa 2 The Tahsildar, Chinnamandya Mandal, Kadapa District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, or direction declaring the proceedins of the 2nd Respondnet issued in Rc. No. /30/2008 dated 14-02-2008 as illegal, arbitrary and one without jurisdiction and consequently directthe 2nd respondent not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners in respect of the land Admeasuring Ac. 3.80 cents in Sy. No. 1643/2 of China Mandyam Mandal, Kadapa District and pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court feels deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.O.MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 5129 of 2008 Order: The petitioners state that to the notice dated 14.02.2008, issued by the 2nd respondent, namely the Tahsildar, Chinnamandya Mandal, alleging that the land purchased by them was Government land, they submitted a detailed explanation on 26.02.2008, but the respondents, without considering the said explanation, are taking steps to evict them from the lands in question and the respondents also made a beat of tom tom to that effect in the village. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents, and both of them agreed for disposal of the writ petition with the following directions: The 2nd respondent, namely the Tahsildar is directed to consider the explanation submitted by the petitioners to the notice dated 14.02.2008 and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law. Till an order is passed, the 2nd respondent is directed not to evict the petitioners from the lands in question. In case the 2nd respondent has already passed an order, the petitioners are at liberty to challenge the same. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 11.03.2008 Nsr ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRT}