1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.588 OF 2007 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION (L) NO.657 OF 2006 IN APPEAL NO.1059 OF 2005 IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGEMENT NO.579 OF 2004 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.1467 OF 2004 M/s.Maurya Enterprises & Anr. .. Plaintiffs Versus Bharat Vissanji .. Defendant Mr.N.Sampati i/b. Thakore Jariwala & Associates for appellant/plaintiffs CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 28th January 2009. P.C. . At the request of decree holder - plaintiffs’ Advocate one weeks’ time is granted to file affidavit proving service. The acknowledgement of the letter dated 5th May 2007 is taken on record and marked "X" 2 2. This is a chamber summons by the decree holder - original plaintiff. The relief claimed is that the judgement debtor be directed to disclose all assets and properties so as to enable the decree holder to execute the decree. 2. This chamber summons has been duly served as is evidenced by the acknowledgement which acknowledges receipt of the letter dated 5th May 2007, enclosing therewith the chamber summons and annexures thereto. There is no affidavit in reply filed. Even otherwise, all that is being directed at this stage is to file affidavit disclosing assets and properties. Accordingly chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Liberty is reserved to the decree holder to apply for further reliefs in the chamber summons as and when occasion arises. 3 (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)