1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38488 of 2009 UMESH RAI SON OF LATE NATHUNI RAI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BANJARIYA,P.S.KATHAIYA,DISTT.MUZAFFARPUR Versus STATE OF BIHAR For the petitioner : Mr.Rakesh Ranjan For the State : Mr.Addl.P.P. ----------- 4/ 19.1.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered against unknown for offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Submission is that neither the petitioner has been put on test identification parade nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his possession. This court had called for a report regarding criminal antecedent of the petitioner. The report has been received from Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur who reported that the petitioner is accused in ten cases. Today a supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner mentioning therein that in all the ten cases as reported by the Superintendent of Police, 2 Muzaffarpur, he has either been granted bail or has been acquitted. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, West Muzaffarpuar inSaraiya P.S.Case No. 209 of 2002. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J. )