MGN IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.24 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.24 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.24 OF 2007 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.3094 OF 2006 PETITION NO.3094 OF 2006 PETITION NO.3094 OF 2006 Anil V. Anturkar ..Petitioner Versus Muncipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. ...Respondents Mr. A.V. Anturkar present in person. Mrs. A.K. Savla, for the respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : : : F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO & REBELLO & REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, V. MOHTA, V. MOHTA, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 2ND MARCH, 2007 : 2ND MARCH, 2007 : 2ND MARCH, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Despite what is set out in the order dated 1st December, 2006 till date there is non-compliance of the order of this Court. The respondents have come by way of Notice of Motion seeking variation of the order dated 11th February, 2006 to the extent that instead of Ward Officer the decision should be taken by the Additional Municipal Commissioner and further request for extension of time. 2. The order of 1st December, 2006 basically was in furtherance of the order of this Court dated 25th January, 2005 in Writ Petition Lodging No.226 of 2005 that this Court had given direction to the Ward Officer. In those circumstances it would not be possible for us to substitute the Ward Officer by Additional Municipal Commissioner. The same is rejected. In so far as extension of time is concerned, we grant further period of six weeks from today to comply with the order of this Court dated 1st December, 2006. With the above observation Motion disposed of. (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, J) J) J)