IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1526 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.2652 OF 2008 Alcon, Inc, Switzerland and Anr. ...Plaintiff Vs. Ajanta Pharma Ltd. ...Defendant --- Shri Nishad Nadkarni i/b. DSK Legal for Plaintiff Mr. Raj V. Rao i/b. Mahesh Mahadgut ---- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED 28TH JULY, 2009 P.C. 1. Parties have settled the matter and they are filing the Consent Terms. Consent Terms are taken on record and marked 'X' for the purpose of identification. The Consent Terms are signed by the authorized signatory of the Plaintiff and Defendant and by their respective advocates. Undertaking given in paragraph Nos. 2,5 and 6 is accepted. Decree is passed in terms of the Consent Terms. Refund of Court fee be paid in accordance with rules. Notice of Motion does not survive and accordingly, disposed of. Certified copy is expedited. V.M. KANADE J. In both these writ petitions, the following questions are called for consideration before this Court: (i) Whether appeals which are filed before the Grievance Committee prior to the Amendment Act No.14 of 2007 and which are pending after the amendment came into effect should be transferred to the School Tribunal which is constituted under the M.E.P.S. Act. (ii) Whether the appeals which were filed before the Amendment Act No.14 of 2007 and were decided by the Grievance Committee after the Amendment Act are valid and proper or these appeals should also be again reopened and transferred to the School Tribunal. (iii) Whether if it is held that the Amendment Act No.14 of 2007 has retrospective effect then whether the appeals which are provided either to the Grievance Committee or to the School Tribunal would also have a retrospective effect. (v) Whether irrespective of the Amendment Act coming into force, whether on completion of three years or 30 months of service as Shikshan Sevak, whether the School Tribunal would have jurisdiction on the Shikshan Sevak completing 30 months of service irrespective of the fact whether this takes place before the Amendment Act comes in question.