IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-15543 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:- 19.05.2011 Parmesh Arora ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Mr. Sapan Dhir, Advocate for the petitioner. RITU BAHRI J.(Oral) Counsel for the petitioner contends that he is witness to agreement to sell (Annexure P3). The buyer of the property is his neighbour and is known to him but he was not aware of the earlier agreement to sell (Annexure P2), the petitioner is not a beneficiary. The respondents have started visiting the house of the petitioner and the petitioner was taken away to police station, where he was detained for five six hours and later on released by threatening that the petitioner has to pay some amount to respondent Nos. 4 to 6. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of by giving a direction to the respondent to give 7 days prior notice, as contemplated under Section 160 Cr.P.C, in case, petitioners is sought to be investigated in any complaint pending with the police. May 19, 2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) G.Arora JUDGE