."•<. RR.Na......^^J^.£.................. Presentedbv^hri,^.'FO.'w.A<.S:h.<^.(-t<<T)^ dated..».l^.h.[.0.&........._;...:;::: ''-..{" ~f IN THE HIGH COURT OF 3UDICATURE AT BILASPUR fC.G.1 WRn" PETmON.NO.S^-^ OF 200^ BETWEEN Ghasiya Singh Thakur S/o. Shri Sher Singh Thakur, aged about 43 years, Occupation - Service, Posted as Assistant teacher posted at Pre. Matric Anusuchit Jati Girls Hostel Sarsinwa Vikaskhand & Tahsil - Bilaigarh, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) Rameshwar Prasad Sultan S/o. Shri Bhagat Ram Sultan, aged about 40 years, Occupation — Service, Posted as Assistant teacher posted at Pre. Matric Anusuchit Jati boys Hostel Pawani Vikaskhand & Tahsil - Bilaigarh, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) PETITIONERS AND 1- The State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary Tribal Development Department D.K.S. Building, Raipur (C.G.) , 2- The Additional Commissioner , Tribal Development Raipur Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) ^'3/--Block Education officer, Tribal Vikaskhand Bilaigarh, af /n^'StVikaskhand &Tahsil - Bilaigarh, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) p /^ t-^ Director of public Instruction pension Bada Raipur ^ Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS •^ cy WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF C? CONSTITUTIONQF INDIA T T XI-HC-22 •TST -^wwi, ^wi'i. INdray *i]<<ni gi*iT«i'Sl.Sf^ ra?'" """~"""'"""""T"""'w;^ an^r^i R'li'* sn^r ^JfTI^>-^T?tT .^ ^N sn^ wnw ^ifef 20-1-2006 Shri'Sunil Sahu, counsel for th< Shri VivekSharma, Panel lawy' Application for urgent hearing i; Heard. Learned counsel for the pettitioner submits that the petitioner has completed 17 years service, but benWt of Time Bound Promotion Scheme has not been given fo him. He further| State counsel does not clispute the petitioner has eompleted 17~year^ the benefit of Time Bound Promotion in simiiar case i.e. W.P.No.6504/200j to consider and decide the case of thj oftime bound promotion.. Accordingiy, the petition is allo^ Gertified copy as per rules. Copy to State counsel for com^liance. ^rafef^T-qitRif •? feczt ^RZTC ^sriSgiisil^l petitioner. r, for the State, on advance copy. allowed. submite that in similar matter i.e. W.P. No.6504/2005, an order has been pa^sed by this Court on 4-1-2006. He prays for simiiar order. he above fact. Having considered the facts ar|d circumstances and in view ofthe fact that of regular service and has not been given icheme and further in view of order passed , it is directed that theconcerned authority petitioner in accdrdance with law for grant ed. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [Tft^ ^\i3^ n.X^il'\^-yLll'C"V71"v/'TlXXdtLJ.i3;sc.t3:.i.xy-^-/AA^^i.Kj'.