1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Contempt Petition No. 89/2008 (Pramod Ramkrushna Tayade VERSUS A.A. Rathod & another) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.P. Pawar, counsel for the petitioner. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : JANUARY 29, 2009. Shri Pawar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the petition was filed in view of the fact that the competent authority was not taking appropriate steps in the matter in spite of the directions issued by the Division Bench of this Court on 19.03.2008 in Writ Petition No.619/2007. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that during the pendency of the contempt petition, the petitioner has been appointed on the post of Lecturer in Political Science. Since there was no time stipulated by the Division Bench of this Court in the order dated 19.03.2008 for taking steps and action in accordance 2 with law, and the steps have been taken within a reasonable time, it is necessary to drop the contempt proceedings initiated against the respondents. The contempt proceedings against the respondents is hereby dropped. The contempt petition is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE APTE