IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH JANUARY 2009 / 8TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 37039 of 2008(H) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- M.P.RADHAMANI, NADAKKAL HOUSE, P.O.MUNDUR, CHERUTHAZHAM, KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR. ADDL.R2. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR (ADDL.2ND RESPONDENT IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN IA NO.987 OF 2009 DT 28/1/2009) GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/01/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 37039 OF 2008 (H) ==================== Dated this the 28th day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T The timings of the petitioner were fixed by Ext.P1 proceedings dated 26/7/08. By filing Ext.P2 dated 9/11/2008, petitioner sought its revision. In this writ petition, by order dated 16/12/2008, this Court directed the petitioner to file an affidavit giving the details of the KSRTC services stated to be introduced subsequent to the introduction of the petitioner's service. 2. Although in the affidavit in support of IA 987/09, petitioner has described about certain KSRTC services, nowhere it is stated that these services were introduced subsequent to the introduction of the petitioner's service. If that be so, no changed circumstances has been made out for the revision of timings fixed on 26/7/2008 sought by Ext.P2 dated 9/11/2008. Hence, this Court will not be justified in directing consideration of Ext.P2. Writ petition fails and is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp