L Prasacl Yadav, S/o. Shri Kn'al Yadav, aged about 4-9 years, R/o. Village Mungadih, Post Baksahi, Tahsil Pali Distt. Korba(CG) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Throuh Secrctary Public Work$ Deparunent, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2. Sub Divisional omcm‘, Sub Diision No.1, Public Works DapalTment (FWD), Katghora, Distt. Korba CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ’ 1S3: Honble Mr. Satish K. mihotri, JJ Sx‘i Vinod Tekam, comma} for the pou'tiolnen Shn' Vmay Han't, Deputy Advocte General for the Stafe. ... .. . " d h {Passe on tis 9‘“ oay ot‘Janum-y 2008) 1. By fhis petition, leamed counsel appean'ng for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was employed on 02.02.1981 as permanent Gangman in he Public Works Department, District Bilaspur, who has wmjked for more than 25 yeals as Gangman seeks a relief that e petitioner being permanent gangman be retired at the age of 62 years in accordance with the Chhattisgarh Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivaxshi'ki-Ayu) Adhiniyam, 1967 (for ehort ‘t'he Act, 1967’} read with Fundamental Rule (for short ‘F.R.’) 56. 2. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner attained the status of permanent employee, as detined under Rule 2 (c) of the Chhattisgarh (Workcharged and Contingency Paid Employees) Pension Rules, 1979 (for short ‘the Rules,1979’), framed under Article 309 of the Constitution of India. After having attained the status of the permanent employee the petitioner would retire on HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILAEPUR W.P.[S) NO. 109/2008 PETITIONER axmi p , RE$PONI§ENTS g v ( h . . .. .. . . .. .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. ()RAL ORDER .. . .. . t th attaining the age of 62 yeam on superannuation under the provisis ofthe Act, 1967. 3. Leamed‘cunsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that case ofthe petitioner is squarely covered y the decision of this Court passed on 4th January, 2007 in W.P‘ No. 108] 2005 (govind Vs. State of attisgarh 35 Gthers) and other connected matters. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State does not dispute the sumissions made by learned counsel for the petioner. ti S. Accordingly, the petitioner, ho is permanent gangman, is entitleri to retire on attainin the age f§2 years in accordance with the Act, 1967. The peti1on is accoringly allowed, subject to verijicanon o the facts. o order as to costs. l/—._ ‘&’ ‘ i Sath K. Agnihtri is o W. Sdl— Judge on o b Chh b w g o j d f N