IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY FRIDAY, THE 5TH AUGUST 2011 / 14TH SRAVANA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 2449 of 2011() ------------------------------- CC.166/2008 of JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-V, KOZHIKODE .................... PETITIONER(S): ------------------- A.V.SUJA, AGED 25 YEARS, D/O.VASU, HARISRI APARTMENT, NADUVATTAM, NORTH BEYPORE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.MANJERI SUNDERRAJ SRI.M.PRAMOD KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BYSTATION HOUSE OFFICER, MARAD POLICE (COMPLAINANT) REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. R.K.RAGESH RAGHAV, AGED 29 YEARS,S/O.RAGHAVAN, 'RAGHAV', KEEZHARIYUR, KOYILANDY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 3. RAGHAVAN, AGED 60 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN, 'RAGHAV', KEEZHARIYUR, KOYILANDY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 4. KUMARI, AGED 56 YEARS, W/O.RAGHAVAN,'RAGHAV', KEEZHARIYUR, KOYILANDY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 5. RARI RAGHAV, D/O.RAGHAVAN, 'RAGHAV', KEEZHARIYUR, KOYILANDY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 6. RAJEESH, AGED 32 YEARS,S/O.RAGHAVAN, 'RAGHAV', KEEZHARIYUR, KOYILANDY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. B. VINOD THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: svs CRMC. NO.2449/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE 1:COPY OF FINAL REPORT IN MARAD CRIME NO.65/2007 WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION. ANNEXURE 2:COPY OF WRITTEN COMPLAINT IN MARAD CR.65/2007. ANNEXURE3:COPY OF WITNESS STATEMENTS RECORDED BY POLICE. ANNEXURE 4:COPY OF LETTER FROM DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PROSECURTION, KERALA. ANNEXURE 5:COPY OF CMP 986/2011 FILED BY PETITIONER IN CC 166/2008. ANNEXURE 6:COPY OF GIST OF SUBMISSIONS BY PRIVATE COUNSEL. ANNEXURE 7:COPY OF ORDER PASSES CMP 986/2011 IN CC 166/2008 BY THE COURT BELOW. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs B.P. RAY, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.M.C. No.2449 of 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 5th day of August, 2011. O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. 2. The petitioner is the de facto complainant in Marad Police Crime FIR No. 65 of 2007 of Marad Police Station, Kozhikode for offences punishable under Sections 406, 498A, 354 and 506(ii) r/w Section 34 IPC and now pending as C.C. No. 166 of 2008 before the Judicial First Class Magistrate-V, Kozhikode. I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that she will file an application before the trial court indicating the grounds for further investigation in this case. If such an application is filed, the learned Magistrate shall pass reasoned orders thereon. This Crl.M.C. is disposed of as above. sd/- B.P. RAY, JUDGE. rv