:Bi H'SIB~" ^-(;*E-i-"-w>fBw"j»yBq y ^: H^<i^t»a'®R •BNtBH'rBGUUttUICTiBIU^an; SA.Na. 483ffl»S SingfeBei^'' ^.;Hen^fcShffCU(p^teio^^ :. 1. ^ 1 • ''-'• [ 1: ,\ 17yea ;S/0-l.^@!ecndayal''Ka BI NBleshKunlarVafB'^^iti^ no. A:& B mihor Mottwr & mjti^^aanBi^ neel ;iasha- WaWW^yiteDiitiwB^'^Bttiay^wfc KaMestof 2. Sadhen-..S^y;Vrt»: Indim ^©»6edenm, Jfi^dalpttF,'D&S..&i!StaBT. &.WE eouna*foFtt»ap|iirilarts. ShriPraMIN.Bhaiat,courwBliferttww?ponctent GIUfceMBHl . . >B< Heaid enadmisstOR. / • • ' 2. Dr. Ninnal aiuMa. I v . ' • • thefonowing,twopoBte,lnthfsappeatf:- A/ that r®B8on^>tefcne B/ thiat mesna.piiciBs.awmdtd;;^ boB* th» Coutlsbetoiivfc®Ifte^50^p«i( wx "ii^ :,1 '11.-. 'f'! i;^' wwwiim & No other pohrtwas laged ^ the temed^nte appellanfsuithisappeal. 3. Having heard ttie leamed eounsel for the^^^ perosedthereeord.teregarcls^tmssnepiofBsa^rded^ below and af^^ toy ^ 1rt ^pdl^^^^®^ ap| llantsaretounat ori^:|X»ssesston^ahBge!area^(a»i>».e.^ 13,287 Sq- fc tn Amaguda. Jagdalpui. Qistt^ Basta(»; TOeretom S^ mesne pnrfits ai^ed t^ the te<^<^(t antf^^i^^ ^pellats Court at Rs. SQ?- per day is^ iust& arwl nasonabte. No sutetanttal qu tlon<rf^aw tRvolvedta»usiappea^flnth®wstdt,»iis Eqapeallsdismissed.ThereshatlbemooEderaSito^eosts. 4. Shri Prafull N. Bhars*. teamed ceunsd <w fl respondent submitted ttiat he has no objection ifT^sonal3le^me^ra anto;ttl$ apppllante tovaG^lhe premises. tamycoi^ctered^^ .apprepriede to granl sbt months' tiiro to tt®sqapdtoits; ts wae^ premises. The appenaitearei3isnted^«nWitt^1in»^te vaeate the preR'iJses. 5. In viewoftheabove,M.©.P^ttei.'7^®<iQ1?^oFGtA®fti»nhea 1 . •' .^l ^ndsdisposedof. j T Sd/- ) DiUp Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge t