IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11582 of 2009 RUKMINI DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 21.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the informant and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner along with other family members have been made accused in the case not to depose in a case filed on behalf of the petitioner for murder of her daughter, so different allegation has been leveled against all the family members. Lady members including this petitioner have been alleged for snatching some ornaments but the police found the case false against this petitioner. Even then cognizance is taken by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate for this super added allegation also. In my view also discussed suggested circumstance does not justify refusal of petitioner’s prayer for anticipatory bail. Prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Khagaria P.S.Case No.506 of 2008, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI