IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.947 of 2011 SUDHEER SINGH, SON OF LATE RAM CHANDRA SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the son of the petitioner was made accused in so-called case of rape and the statement of victim of the aforesaid rape case had already been recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. so, there was no occasion for the petitioner to go at the house of the informant for pressurizing her as well as her daughter not to depose in the aforesaid rape case. It is further contended by him that, as a matter of fact, the informant and her other family members have lodged several false cases against the petitioner as well as his other family members. Taking into consideration the above stated submissions as well as facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, Patna in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case No. 385 of 2010. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)