cp422.10 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 422 OF 2010 Mubarakkhan s/o Yunuskhan Pathan .. PETITIONER VERSUS Sunil Patil & another .. RESPONDENTS Mr. D.R. Irale-Patil, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. V.R. Sonwalkar, advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2. ===== CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J. DATE : 7 th MARCH, 2011. PER COURT : 1 The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Jalna vide order dated 25-11-2011 has specifically ordered that the period of suspension between 31-5-1998 to 31-8-2007 shall be treated as a period during which the employee has served the institution for all practicable purposes. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the order passed on 25-2-2011, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. 2 Learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions, states that the cp422.10 2 dues payable to the employee shall be paid within a period of four weeks from today. The contemnor – respondent no. 1 has tendered an unconditional apology and has also stated in the affidavit in reply as to why there was delay in rendering decision in the matter. The unconditional apology tendered by respondent no. 1 is accepted. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not have any subsisting grievance as against respondent no. 2. It is made clear that if the Chief Executive Officer deems it appropriate, he has liberty to take appropriate steps as against respondent no. 2. So far as this contempt petition is concerned, it does not require any consideration and the same stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE dyb