IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 19TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 30TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 5547 of 2010(P) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- M.K.REGHU, AGED 66 YEARS, S/O.NALLAKAN, MANAKKAPADATH HOUSE, CHOTTANIKARA P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.ABRAHAM P.GEORGE SMT.K.V.LEKSHMY SMT.C.L.MANJU RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. THE CHOTTANIKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT REP. BY ITS SECREARY, PANCHAYAT OFFICE BUKLDINS, CHOTTANIKKARA P.O. 2. THE SECRETARY, CHOTTANIKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, PANCHAYAT OFFICE BUILDING, CHOTTANIKKARA P.O. 3. SREEDHARAN EMBRANTHIRI, CHERUPARAMBU MADOM, CHOTTANIKARA P.O. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR, SC FOR CHOTTANIKKARA PANCHAYAT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 5547 OF 2010 (P) ===================== Dated this the 19th day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T The prayer sought is for a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to consider and pass orders on Exts.P2 and P4, where allegations were raised by the petitioner against the 3rd respondent for having made certain unauthorised constructions. 2. If as stated, these complaints have been received, it is directed that the 2nd respondent shall take necessary action thereof with notice to the 3rd respondent also. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 6 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the claim raised and it is entirely for the 2nd respondent to deal with the same. 3. Petitioner may produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp