IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10656 of 2008 Nathuni Miyan son of Manjhi Miya resident of Village Mahadeva, Police Station Bathnaha, District sitamarhi. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Home Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi. 5. The Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi. 6. The Director, Consolidation Department, Government of Bihar Patna. 7. The Deputy Director, Consolidation, Sitamarhi. 8. The Assistant Consolidation Officer, Bathanaha, Sitamarhi. ----------- 2 29.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The present writ application has been filed for a direction to respondents to remove the encroachment from Old Khata No. 237, Keshra No. 405, 406, 408, 409 and 481 situated in village Mahadev in the District of Sitamarhi. It is claimed by the petitioner that in the cadastral survey record, the land is recorded in the name of Fakir Karan son of Rosan Sah, but in revisional survey, the plot number has been changed as Plot no. 66, 993 and 994 where the name of one Jagdish Prasad Singh son of Shivanand Singh was recorded which was challenged by the grandson of Karam Sah vide Case No. 157/78 before 2 the Assistant Consolidation Officer, Batharaha, where the Consolidation Officer passed order in favour of other side. It appears from para 12 of the writ petition that Title Suit No. 87 of 2006 is still pending with regard to the same land, hence, in view of this Court, the relief sought for in the present writ application is not maintainable. It is expected that the learned court below will expedite the trial of the title suit. With the above observation, the writ application is disposed off. Amrendra/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)