IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4272/01 K.K. Sahriya vs. Jaipur Development Authority & Ors. 15.4.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr. G.Bardar with Mr. Mohan Choudhary for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 17.7.2001 by which the Tribunal in appeal preferred by the petitioner accepted the application of the respondent no.2 for his impleadment. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the dispute involved in the appeal before the JDA was inter se between the petitioner and the JDA and that the respondent no.2 had no say whatsoever. Learned counsel argued that it is settled law that strangers cannot be allowed to become party to the proceeding which even if eventually decided does not result into any adverse effect on them. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner has challenged before the Tribunal, the order passed by the respondent-JDA dated 13.5.1997 whereby the allotment of strip of land adjacent to his plot has been cancelled whereas the petitioner had already sent long back the amount of premium as demanded by the the UIT. The respondent no.2 was neither a necessary, nor even a proper party and allotment which was made way back on 24.4.1977 could not be sought to be reopened at the instance of a stranger. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order as also the application submitted by the respondent no.2 before the Tribunal where he has claimed that his land was also adjacent to the disputed strip of land and the reply thereof submitted by the petitioner, I am not inclined to interfere with the order of the Tribunal directing his impleadment. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. (Mohammad Rafiq),J. RS/-