IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41368 of 2010 MUSO LOHAR @ MUSO SONAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 26.3.2011 Heard leaned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State and perused the order of the Sessions Judge, Saharsa whereby petitioner’s prayer for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 302, 201/34 of the IPC has been rejected after noticing relevant materials in the case diary on the basis whereof police has found involvement of the petitioner also in the murder of a woman. The submission that there is no direct evidence connecting petitioner with the offence may be considered at appropriate stage after petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail. But considering the nature of the offence, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. sk (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)