IN THE HIGH COURT OP KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 08TH DAY OP SEPTEMBER 2011 BEFORE THE HOWBLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT J GUNJAL WRIT PETITION NO 1396612009 (LR) BETWEEN: Suit riaiuhavattii, kgrd ahotil 80 years, D/ o Sb ritliiraja Naik Semor itizenship not claim. R/o Doildamane Manic \‘illage 57410 1, Post Ajekar, Karkala Taluk, Udupi District. 2 Sri. A N Rathnavarrna Ja’n, Aged about 48 can, S/ [at Anm Hegde, R/o Doddamane, Manic Village — 574101, Post Ajekm, Karkala Taluk [‘dupi District. PFT1Ti0NERS (BySri/Sirt RAMFSH(IIAN)PA Al nc AND: State of Karnataka, Represented by its Se ret in, K a’ i i )epartmc nt Vidhana Soudha, Bangalore — 560 001. 2. The Land Tribunal Kaikala, Represented b its Chainnan. Karkela Karkala Taluk f dupi Disthet V 2 3 Sn A Vasudev i Bhat, S/o Lakshminara)ana [That Smce deceased 3s R2madevi Aged about 53 can D/o Vat deva Bhat 3b) Rangantb Aged about 50 wan S/c Vasudeva Bhat Sc) Sb idevi, Aged about 48 yean D/o Vasudeva Bhat 3d) Snpatlu Aged about 4a y can Sb Vasudeva Elba 3) Snmathi Aged about 43 er D/o Vssudeva Rh t Santhn Aged about 41 can D/o\asude alh I Vs Ii Ascd about ‘3) tar 0/ It ul ta tat Aged abut I sean 0/ idaaBbit Ag I about 3 y ears 0/\i-c’k, 1SF t 5 (a ta (i aa Residmg at Golipaike, Visirn umUrthv Temp Ic Road Manic 574 101, Post Ajekar, Karkala TaIuk, I lupi Dsitri t RE SPONDNTS (k i /Smt RAMA( HANDRA P NAIP, iP takes otke foi RI & P2, AG GUR1IPAJA, Advocate for P3(b), GA SD) Plus Writ Petition I flied ind r Article 226 & 227 of th Constitution of India pun lug to quash the order of the 2114 respondent at Annexuredt, the order of the 1 and 1 nbunal harkala in ease NoTRL/538/8 D82 dated 269 1981. This Writ Pet ii ton coming on for orders on this da the cotn t tnad the following order. ORDER flue w eek thne is gi anted to do the needful failu ig ii Inch, petition stands dismissed ititliont fiutliei icfeer’ee to ( oust T F’v tMP S, [t1 D0E AaI !1:0 f:isn$ 4ijri ‘, - dMJzIØ < I ;tL ‘&V