IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27276 of 2008 NARENDRA PANDIT S/O LATE FAGU PANDIT R/O VILLAGE- MUNGRAURA, KUMHAR TOLA, P.S.- EAST COLONY, DISTRICT- MUNGER. ………….Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. RAJ KUMAR PANDIT, S/O RAGHUNATH PANDIT R/O VILLAGE- MUNGAURA KUMHAR TOLA, P.S.- EAST COLONY, DISTRICT- MUNGER. …………..Opposite Parties ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Prasant Sinha, Adv. For the State : Mrs. Meena Kumari Jaiswal, APP ------------ 2. 20.05.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 12.01.2008 passed by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Munger in G.R. No. 1134 of 2003 by which it has allowed examination of an additional witness under Section 311 Cr.P.C. The petitioner is also aggrieved with the order of the Sessions Judge, Munger in Cr. Rev. No. 85/08 by which he has affirmed the order. Considering that the Trial Court is the best Judge to consider as to whether the examination of the witness is for the just decision of the case and the present application is a second revision in the garb of Section 482 Cr.P.C. and no patent illegality could be pointed out, the application is dismissed. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)