IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH DECEMBER 2007 / 28TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 RP.No. 1247 of 2007() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.26517/2007 Dated 23/11/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER:. ------------------------------- SHOBHANA T., ANGANAVADI HELPER, CENTRE NO. 78, THERUVATHU KADAVU, NADUVANNUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH. BY ADV. SRI.SANTHARAM.P RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT OFFICER, DISTRICT SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 3. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, ICDS, BALUSSERY BLOCK. 4. SHOBHANA, KALAMULLATHIL (HOUSE), KAVIL P.O., NADUVANNUR (VIA), KOYILANDY TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BEJOY CHANDRAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. GIRI, J. ------------------------------------------- R.P.NO.1247 OF 2007 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of December, 2007. JUDGMENT After having heard the learned counsel for the review petitioner and having perused the Memorandum of Review petition, I am satisfied that there are no grounds to review the judgment. The learned counsel for the review petitioner points out that the reference made to the 2nd respondent in Paragraph-2 of the judgment is actually a reference to be made to the 4th respondent. This is correct. Subject to this observation, this review petition is disposed of. V. GIRI, JUDGE. cl . 2 . 3