IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10277 of 2010 JAIKISHUN SAH, SON OF RAMDEO SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-MANI CHAWK, P.S.- RUNISAIYDPUR, DISTRICT-SITAMARHI. With Cr.Misc. No.15238 of 2010 MADAN PATHAK, SON OF KEDAR PATHAK, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-MANIK CHAWK, P.S.- RUNNISAIDPUR, DISTRICT-SITAMARHI. …..Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …..Opposite Party. For the Petitioner : Mr. Uma Shankar Verma (Adv.) For the State : Mr. U.S.P. Singh (APP). ----------- 02/ 12.05.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the State. Prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected earlier thrice considering the allegation that the petitioner was found in possession of Ganja of commercial quantity. Submission is that according to the allegation this petitioner and Ram Hirdya Mahto were found in possession of 21 kgs. of Ganja each at that time Madan Pathak was following them. Through Annexure-3, it has been pointed out that the similarly situated co-accused Ram Hirdya Mahto has already been granted bail in Cr. Misc. No. 44498 of 2009 on 23.12.2009. The petitioner is in custody since 12.09.2005. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioners are directed to be released from custody on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten 2 thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge/court concerned, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with N.D.P.S. Case No. 77 of 2005 (Darpa P.S. Case No. 26 of 2005), subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and (ii)that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)