IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.17668 of 2005 Between: Ramisetty Ramakrishna, S/o. R. Hanumantha Rao, R/o H.No. 3-4-47, Islampet, Narasaraopet, Guntur District, ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Principal, Narasaraopet Engineering College, Narasaraopet, Guntur District, 2 The Registrar, JNTU, Masabtank, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, Order or Direction directing the respondents herein to permit the petitioner to prosecute the Engineering Course in the 1st Respondent college pending investigation, enquiry and trial pursuant to registration of Crime No. 42/2005 of Narasaraopet Rural Police Station, Guntur District by declaring the order passed by the 1st Respondent in proceedings NEC/Aca./ORD/2005, dt. 10-6- 2005 as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and pass such other order or orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI T.NIRANJAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: MR.K.RATHANGA PANI REDDY The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.17668 of 2005 ORDER: The petitioner challenges the order dated 10.06.2005 passed by the ﬁrst respondent whereby and whereunder he along with another student was removed from the College on the ground that he was involved in Crime No.42 of 2005 under Sections 302, 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The petitioner joined the ﬁrst respondent – College in B.Tech., (Information and Technology) during the academic year 2003-2004. On a complaint given by Smt.Kursheed on 19.04.2005, Crime No.42 of 2005 was registered. The petitioner, who was shown as accused No.4 in the case, was remanded to judicial custody and later released on bail on 25.04.2005. On coming to know about this, the impugned order was passed. This Court while admitting the writ petition suspended the impugned order. Subsequently, by another interim order in W.P.M.P.No.22894 of 2006 he was permitted to appear for the examination and respondents were directed to announce the result. When the case is called, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who was accused No.4 in Sessions Case No.293 of 2006 on the ﬁle of the Court of the X Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Narsaraopet, was acquitted by judgment dated 27.02.2008. He also submits that the petitioner has already completed the course. In that view of the matter, the impugned order cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, and if the petitioner’s result is not declared, the same may be declared. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 20.10.2008 vs To 1 The Principal, Narasaraopet Engineering College, Narasaraopet, Guntur District, 2 The Registrar, JNTU, Masabtank, Hyderabad 3 2CCs to 4 2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VSMI}