IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 94 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 662 OF 2003 SMT.LISETTE E.R.CAMARA, PANAJI ....Applicants GOA. Versus STATE OF GOA BY THE ....Respondents SECRETARY(SPORTS) AND 5 ORS., Mr. A. F. Diniz, advocate for the applicant. Mr. S. R. Rivankar, Government Advocate for respondent nos.1 & 2. Mr. S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Ms. S. Naik, advocate for the respondent nos.3 to 6. Coram:- R. M. LODHA & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 6th September, 2005 P.C. The learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner, does not press this Miscellaneous Civil Application in view of the events that had taken place subsequently. Miscellaneous Civil Application is disposed of as not pressed. Though the learned counsel for the applicant prays for early hearing of the Writ Petition, we find it difficult presently to expedite the hearing of the Writ Petition. Liberty to the petitioner to apply after six months for early hearing of the Writ Petition. R. M. LODHA, J. N. A. BRITTO, J.