cp58.11 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.58 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1779 OF 2009 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Mr.P.S. Pawar, Adv. for petitioner (Absent). Mr.D.R. Kale, AGP for State. Mr.S.T. Shelke, Advocate for Respondent No.5. CORAM: S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 22.06.2011. When the matter is called out, none appears for the petitioner. Even the matter is not mentioned on behalf of the petitioner for pass over. 2 The learned AGP appearing for the State invited my cp58.11 2 attention to the affidavit-in- reply filed by Dr. P. Anbalagan, working as Collector, Ahmednagar and submitted that compliance of the order of the Division Bench, of which disobedience is alleged, has been made. He invited my attention to para 10 of the affidavit-in-reply, which reads thus: “10. The Deponent humbly say and submit that the Respondent No.4 has complied the order passed by the Hon’ble High Court, as the Respondent No.5 has prepared the list of the eligible families and name of that eligible family is included in the BPL List as per the Government Resolution dated 7/11/2006. The process of admission of appeals is continuous and up-gradation of said list is also continuous.” 3 Since the affidavit-in-reply has been filed by the Collector stating therein that the order of cp58.11 3 the Division Bench has been complied with and there is no any counter affidavit filed and the Advocate for the petitioner is not present, it will have to be presumed that what is stated in the affidavit by the responsible Officer i.e. Collector, Ahmednagar on oath is correct. 4 Contempt Petition stands disposed of. Notice stands discharged. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) PLK/*