IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 3011 of 2008. Decided on: 20.09.2010. __________________________________________________________ Subhash Chand. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. N.D. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondent No.1 and 2. Respondents No.3 to 18 ex-parte. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Mr. N.D. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has become infructuous in view of the reply filed by the respondent-State. Consequently, the same is dismissed as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. September 20, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?