SSK/929 1 appr 432.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 432 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 475 OF 2006. Sainik Sahakari Cooperative Bank Ltd. ....Applicant/ Org. Respt.No.1 Versus Abdul Kalam Abdul Samad Jalal & Anr. ...Respondents Mr. Omkar Warange, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. R. B. Mungekar, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr. Rajesh More, APP for the State. CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATED : 18th NOVEMBER, 2011. P.C.: Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. The application is taken out by the applicant for withdrawal of an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- deposited by respondent no.1. This amount was deposited by respondent no.1, in pursuance of Order of this Court dated 6th December, 2006 in the above revision application. The said revision application was disposed of by this Court by Order dated 28th March, 2007 and an appeal filed by the accused-respondent no.1 before the Sessions Court challenging the order of conviction passed by Magistrate under Section 138 was directed to be disposed of. SSK/929 2 appr 432.11 3. The appeal filed by the respondent no.1 is also disposed of. The order of the Magistrate sentencing the respondent no.1/accused is modified and reduced to simple imprisonment till rising of the court. However, the order regarding the amount of compensation was not disturbed. In the above circumstances, the applicant is entitled to withdraw the amount deposited by respondent no.1. Learned counsel for respondent no.1 has no objection, if the applicant withdraws the said amount. The application is, therefore, allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and disposed of, as such. (RANJIT MORE, J.)