IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2449 of 2001 Kapildeo Prasad Ambastha Versus B.K.Sinha & Ors. ----------- 3. 14.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as also the learned counsel for the Corporation. The grievance of the petitioner is with respect to interest over the admitted dues, which has not been paid as yet. Mr Nand Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party-Corporation submits that the interest and the cost, if any, would be considered only after disposal of the matter pending before the Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its decision in the case of Bashishtha Narain v. State of Bihar, reported in 1997(1)PLJR 978. In this view of the matter, the contempt application need not proceed further. The same stands disposed of. However, it will be open for the petitioner to agitate his claim for interest, if any, in the light of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of State of Bihar v. Surajdeo Singh and others while disposing of the matter finally. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)