IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23329 of 1999 Between: B. Jagannadham, S/o. Ramaiah, Foreman Gr-IV, M.R.T. Division, A.P. Transco Ltd., Karimnagar, Karimnagar District. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Vice-Chairman and Managing Director, A.P. Transco Ltd., Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. 2 The Supertintending Engineer, Operation Circle, A.P. Transco Ltd.,, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ more in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not absorbing the petitioner and not present circle as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14,16,and 21 of Constitution of India and issue consequential directions to the respondents to reckon the seniority of the petitioner w.e.f. the date of his transfer to the present circle by treating the petitioner as deemed to be absorbesd in the present circle in which the petitioner was now working from the date of their transfer to the present circle and grant all consequential benefits such as promotion etc. Counsel for the Petitioner:SMT.S.V.INDIRA Counsel for the Respondents: P.R.BALARAMI REDDY(SC FOR AP TRANSCO) The Court made the following: Order: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. __________________________ JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY. August 27, 2008 MRR