lN'THEsMfGti.CO:Ul^t^©Hl-l»T^^^RM,J^^ ••":-;';\'-1:''.BiEIJ^B!Ui^f<2.®SAA":S^ ^':':'w.P..^^N6.y.'?,y':^<"2.^ PETITIONER RESPONDENTS )>^~.^;.. :^s<^cp-^^? 'vs>-'" •-r^^i^''- ^•",?i:':: •/' 'y'.i'?' • /' •*'.•' ,•?' .••' *;/•• ;'^./ -.' '•.iy'':' '•If' "• .'.. '^: Ram Avtar'CKoubey, aged'aBoul 16I.^^,y^ars,.:..::';'S^o;l.^'^sffif:^i;'';Ihi-i; Ovv&rikaflath;, ^^h^uB^^^Hsa'Gl' .Mastei-, ^.,@(!wemn^t;':^?)ai'irfjat-y' •SeKWI;^'•;^'^•SeT^0or^'^\^gB^ Balrarnpiar, E)i:stt:.';Sargyja^.((S.lG;;}i :1 A-" ^- State ':of.;'iGFrlT'affii:gga:rh:.^'';:;,:g.l.:''1'.^^ ThrSugl't Secretary, Ti-ibal Wdfare'Depa ment, '^ ^ ;D.K.S. Bt-iawan, Rai[3ur (e:.iS.^i^ ; CbmmissiOher, Tribal^ WglfaFe ,Depa'rtrnent^.RS ip'i.fr- (i@.©.;)s'?" j; ' :3oiht^Drret^ffl^ TFeSSHi^^rAG:£0a ;&- Pensi©n^.'^[frb)l^p:i^,y^@^ -Sgr§:a]a^CC.:G:.);";--.,,:a:,,^}',-':\^:?<'',:"^'' Assistarit' .Corfl'missiorfei", ?Tribal Welfars Deisai-trnenfe^^tl'n&iKgpyr': ,DiStt.rSarguja,(G.G;):'^'.1,',',-^,^ BI&Gfc : Ed i.11::atii3n :i • ^, ©ffiGer,^ Balrampur, DistnEt.. - Scirguja,r .<e.G^:..,''..:f:;....:;::.,;•..:-:;. WRlTPETltlON^NiaEltAftTI(2l.E2^®©t?1-l-l^ t:ONSti¥UlOlMOFlNiC»Ift^ PARTICULARSOFTHE PETITIONER /-' As mentioriecl in the cause title. PARTICU LARS OFtHERiSPi@NG>ENfS 'V^) (( / HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WRIT PETmON/S') No. 223 of2011 RamAvtar Choubey. RESPONDENTS VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUnON OF INDIA SB: Hon'Me Shri Satish K. Asmhotn, J. Present: ShriRahulMishra,Advocateforthepetitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer forthe State/respondents. ORDER(ORAL) .(Passed on. 06th day ofMay, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to second kramonnati w.&/ 19.04.1999 on completion of 24 years of service, as clarified by memo dated 03.10.2008 (Annexure P/2). For grant ofthe aforesaid benefit of second kramonnati, the petitioner has preferred the instant petition, praying that the similar relief as granted in the case ofR.S.Verma v. State-ofChhattisgarh&Ofhers maybe granted asthe faets aad issuedinvolved inboth thepetitions, are similar. : 2. After having considered (he above submission ofleamed counsel appearmg for fhe petitiffner, this Court, on 17.01.2011, granted three weeks time to the State/respondents to file response. Till date, no response has been filed. Leamed counsel for the State/respondents does not controvert the above-stated submission. 3, Inviewoftheforegomg,thepetitionisdisposed of in the tenns of oiderpassediiiR.S.Verma(supra). No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge •-\-.—--- ' W.P. Na. 2805/2002, dated 29.08.2006