-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO.5502 OF 2006 1. Sou. Vithabai Namdeo Pisal and anr Petitioners Vs 1. Hanmant Laxman Jagdale & ors Respondents. Mr S.B.Sonwalkar, for the petitioners. Mr V.V.Savaji i/b Mr P.B.Shah for the respondents. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 05.09.2006 DATE : 05.09.2006 DATE : 05.09.2006 PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. In this petition, the petitioners have impugned the order dated 19.4.2006, by which their application seeking amendment to the pleadings filed under Order 6 rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, has been rejected. It was rejected solely on the ground that similar amendment was sought by the petitioners earlier and that application was rejected on 11.4.2005 and that order had not been carried further by the petitioners. Admittedly, there is no difference between the amendment sought earlier and now by filing the application at Exhibit-67. In the circumstances, I see no reason to exercise the writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is dismissed. -2- (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)