:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.129 OF 2004 SUMMARY SUIT NO.129 OF 2004 SUMMARY SUIT NO.129 OF 2004 TTK Healthcare Ltd. ..Plaintiffs. Vs. Mayura M. Deolalkar ..Defendant. Mr.V.V.Warekar i/b.Warekar & Warekar for the Plaintiffs. None for the Defendant. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 16TH JANUARY, 2008 DATED : 16TH JANUARY, 2008 DATED : 16TH JANUARY, 2008 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : The suit is filed to recover amounts in respect of the goods sold and delivered by the Plaintiffs to the Defendant. 2. No appearance was filed. There is no written statement. On behalf of the Plaintiffs, a compilation of documents is filed. The same is taken on record and marked Exhibit "A" Collectively. 3. The deliveries were made on terms and conditions contained in and/or evidenced by the invoices. 4. The Defendant has admitted and acknowledged his liabilities as is evidenced from the documents on :2: record. There is nothing on record that militates against the Plaintiff’s claim. The averments and submissions in the plaint and the documents on record clearly establishes the Plaintiff’s claim in the suit. 5. In the circumstances, the suit is decreed as prayed. 6. Refund as per rules.