IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.493 of 2009 VISHWANATH CHOUDHARY, S/O LATE SONE LAL CHOUDHARY, R/O VILLAGE-RAMPUR JALALPUR, P.S.- DALSINGSARAI, DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR. ………………PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER. Versus 1. RAM NARESH CHOUDHARY, S/O RAGHUNANDAN CHOUDHARY. 2. RAJNISH CHOUDHARY 3. RAJESH CHOUDHARY SONS OF RAM NARESH CHOUDHARY. R/O VILLAGE-RAMPUR JALALPUR, P.S.- DALSINGSARAI, DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR. ………………DEFENDATNS/OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 2 30.03.2009 The plaintiff has filed this revision application against order dated 19.12.2008 passed by learned Munsif, Dalsingsarai in Title Suit No. 15 of 2000 by which the learned Munsif has rejected the report of the Pleader Commissioner appointed at the instance of the defendants and has given liberty to the defendants to get another Pleader Commissioner appointed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the defendants have not taken any steps for appointment of another Pleader Commissioner inspite of liberty granted to them. He further submits that in view of the dispute in the suit, physical verification of the disputed property and a report from the Pleader Commissioner to the Court is essential. If that is so, the plaintiff-petitioner - 2 - will also be at liberty to file petition in the court below for appointment of Pleader Commissioner at his behalf, and at his cost. In view of the fact that the report of the earlier Pleader Commissioner appointed at the instance of the defendants has been rejected by the court below on the ground of several defects in the same, if such a petition is filed by the plaintiff-petitioner, the court below shall consider the same expeditiously and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. With above observations and directions, this revision application is disposed of. Arvind/ (J. N. Singh, J.)