CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.18495 OF 2006 :{ 1 }: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISION: MAY 03 ,2011 Ms. Bimla .....Petitioner VERSUS Guru Jambheshwar University, Hisar and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. N. R. Dahiya, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ramesh Hooda, Advocate, for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Ms. Shruti Jain, AAG, Haryana, for the State. Mr. Sanjiv K. Tamak, Advocate, for respondent No.4. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. Respondent No.4 was appointed on the post, which was advertised, where the petitioner was also an applicant. Number of pleas are raised to challenge the selection of respondent No.4. Primarily, it is pleaded that she being from Uttar Pradesh, could not have been considered, even though she was married in the State of Haryana. As per counsel for the petitioner, respondent No.4 was not legally entitled to claim domicile of the State of Haryana or CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.18495 OF 2006 :{ 2 }: reservation as a scheduled caste, though this fact has been disputed by the respondents. However, all these facts may not need to be gone into now as respondent No.4 concededly has left the job. The writ petition is, therefore, rendered infructuous and the same is disposed of as such. The petitioner would be at liberty to apply again as and when the post is advertised. May 03 ,2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE