HIOH CQURT OF CHHATTISGAKH.JSILASPUR W.P. (Sl No. 5506/2007 PBTITIONERS 3. Manglu Ram. Banjare, S/o late Shri Raahiya Lal Banjare, Age about 66 years, Occupation Service, R/o Rav^ram, TeUbaadha, Maiu Road, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Versus State of CIihattisgarh, through Pruicipal Secretary P.W.D. Departm.ent Maatralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) Executive Engiaeer, P.W.D. Department, Division No.l, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Sub Divisional Officer, P.W.D. Department, Sub Division No. 1, Raipur(C,G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Shri Yogesh Pandey, Couasel for fhe petitioner. Shri Ajay Dvrivedi, Paxiel Lawyer for fhe State. ORAL ORDBR (21.09.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J Heard. Learued counsel for the petitioner subinits that the facts and question of law iavolved in fhe present writ petitioa are similar to that ofW.P. No.4135/2004 (M.A. Hakim -vs.- State of M.P. (Now C.G.) aad ofhers), which has already been disposed ofF by order dated 28.8.2007, Agaiust the order passed in. ffae said case, one S.L.P. was filed iu Supreiue Coiirt which was also dismissed. He further submits that thereafber, a review petition was filed, which was also disnussed. Thus fhe case is squarely covered by fhe saM decision. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Paael Lawyer, appearing for the State submits that it is not in dispute fhat this niatter is covered by W.P. (S) No.5506/2007 the decision of M.A. Hakim's case (supra) aad fhis petition can be disposed off ia the terms of fhe order passed in M.A. Hakim's case. In view of fhe above joiat statenient inade at fhe bar, fhis petition is disposed off in terrus of the order passed in W.P. No.4135/2004 (M.A. Hakim -vs- State of M.P. (Now Chliattisgarh) and ofhers), which was decided on 28.8.2006. No order as to costs. __ ^ifi^rv^ Sd/- Sunil Kuinar Sinha Judge