IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-33519 of 2008 Date of Decision: December 19, 2008 Inderjit Singh … Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another …Respondents. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND Present : Ms. B.P.K. Brar, , Advocate, for the petitioner. *** S.D. Anand, J. (Oral) Crl. Misc. No. 59094 of 2008 Allowed, as prayed for. Crl. Misc. No. M-33519 of 2008 The petitioner – prisoner is on parole and he is to surrender on 21.12.2008. The learned counsel for the petitioner-prisoner argues in favour of the grant of extension of parole period because petitioner-prisoner is required to be by the side of his wife, who is suffering from hypertension and IHD chest pain. Crl. Misc. No. M-33519 of 2008 Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Ms. Manjari Nehru Kaul, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the State. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, it is ordered that the parole period of the petitioner-prisoner shall stand extended for a period of one month. It will be for the learned State counsel to communicate the order to the Competent Authority. Copy of this order be given to the learned counsel for the State counsel under the signatures of the Court Secretary. December 19, 2008 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 2