IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 3902 of 2007 Between: K.M.Rajani, w/o Manjunadha Swamy, r/o D.Harehal Village and Mandal, Anantapur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Women & Child Welfare Development Department by its Project Director, Anantapur. 2 The District Collector, Ananthapur District, Anantapur. 3 Smt. Indira, w/o Gopal, R/o D.Harehal V&M, Anantapur District. 4 Shanu, d/o late Baksheesh Sab, r/o D.Harehal Village, Anantapur istrict. 5 Roopa, w/o Mallikarjuna, r/o Linganhelli Village, Rayadurgam Mandal, Ananthapur District. 6 Jayamma, w/o Prasad,Kulkarthi Village, D.Harelal Mandal, Ananthapur District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in appointing respondents 3 to 6 as Anganwadi Workers who were non-local and possess less qualification and who are well to do women by ignoring the petitioner who has qualifications and belongs to B.C.Group as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of the rules and norms prescribed and consequently by setting aside the appointment of 3rd respondent as Anganwadi Worker in I.C.D.S., Project of the 1st respondent and direct the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the candidature of the petitioner and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondents 1 & 2: GP FOR WOMEN DEVELOPMENT & CHILD WELFARE The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.3902 OF 2007 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner addressed a letter, dated 20.02.2008, to the Registry stating that he has instructions from the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. _________________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 21st February, 2008. IBL To 1 The Project Director, District Women & Child Welfare Development Department, Anantapur. 2 The District Collector, Ananthapur District, Anantapur. 3 Two CCs to G.P. for Women Development & Child Welfare, High Court of A.P., High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. (OUT) 4 Two CD Copies