1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3740/2008 (Prakash Harikisan Rathi and others vs. The Akola Janta Commercial Co-op. Bank Ltd. and others) ====================================== CORAM : B.P.Dhamadhikari, J. DATE : 25 st NOVEMBER, 2008 Heard. The arbitrator has not found document sought by petitioner to be relevant at all and therefore, has not directed the applicant i.e. present respondent no.1 to produce the same. Advocate Mohta, has invited my attention to the applications moved by the petitioner before the arbitrator for said purpose. Perusal of the application show that the relevance of the documents can be brought out in evidence to be tendered by the petitioner before Arbitrator. The petitioner has already cross examined the witnesses for respondent Bank on this line. If after recording of the evidence of present petitioners, the Arbitrator finds that the documents need to be called from the bank, the Arbitrator is free to pass those orders at that stage. At present, no case warranting interference 2 in writ jurisdiction is made out. Writ petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE Rvjalit