IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.2848 of 2009 Date of Decision : 10.3.2010 Satwinder Singh alias Soni ....Petitioner Versus Gram Panchayat, Village Kurali and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Gaurav Tangri, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Balram Singh, Advocate for the respondents. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the opinion that there is no infirmity in the impugned order as the discretion vested in the Court has been judiciously exercised considering the three ingredients that ought to be considered while deciding the application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC, i.e., balance of convenience, irreparable loss and injury and prima facie case being in favour of a party. However, in the given set of circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will conclude his entire evidence if two more effective opportunities are granted to him and in such an eventuality a direction be issued to the learned trial Court to dispose of the case expeditiously. C.R.No.2848 of 2009 -2- The request of learned counsel for the petitioner seems to be justified considering the fact that the suit was filed in the year 2006. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned trial Court to afford only two effective opportunities to the petitioner to conclude his entire evidence. Likewise, the respondents shall be given three effective opportunities to conclude their evidence. No unnecessary adjournment shall be granted and an endeavour shall be made to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible. Disposed of. 10.3.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss