"^' Petttjoner Respondent 'ResRondents HSGH COURT OF CKHATTISGARH AT_BiLASPUR W.P. (Art.227)No.4382Qf201l Smt.Do!ly S.Rarn, aged about 45 years, W/Q Shri Samual Ram, R/'o Kasdol, Tahsli-Kasdoi, Djstrlct-Ralpur Ver^us 1. State of Chhattssgarh, -through the CoSjector, RaJpur, DJstrict-RaJpur (C.G.) 2. Dinesh Kumar ?v1lshra, S/o Not known, R/o Godhara, KasdoS, TahsII-KasdoI, District-Raipur (C.G.) AppeHant (Writ Petltion under Arlscie 227 ofthe Constltution of Indla) l^r.Goutam Khotrapal, counsei fortho petitioner,, Mr.Sumit Jhanwar, Pand Lswyer for respondent No. 1 /State. (SB: Hon'bie Mr. T.P. Sharma, J.) ORDER(ORAL) (8-8-2011) 1. By this petitlon under Art'.de 227 of ths Constltytlon of in<iia the petjtloner has ch-ailenged the iegality'& propriety oftho ordordated 1S.2<20C85 passod. bythe Board of Revenue In Revenue Cass No.206/A-5S/2003-04, whereby tho Board of Revenue has reversed the ordor datod 17.2.2003 p.assed by the Aaditional CoiEector, Baioda Bazaarsn Revsnu®Csse No.23/A-5S/2002-03, alEowing the iand tb tho petitlonor, . ' ' - . " 2. The order passed by tho 3oard of RQvcnuo was chaljonged.before Clvlj Judgs Ciass-ii, Baloda Bazaar in Civ!! SuSt No.87A/'05 and the Court below has dismlssed the suit vlde judgmsnt dated 13.3.2007. 3. After iapse of more than six years of order of the Board of Revenue, tho potltlon.er has filed thjs wnt petjtion under Artlcte 227 of the Constltution of india. 1 do not flnd any ground. for interference in tho aforosaid ordor passod by tho 3oard.cf Revonye afcer iapse of sjx years/ 4. Consoquently, tho writ potltlon Is ijable.to be djsmissed and It is hereby dis'missed. Ho ordor as to costs. 5. interim 8.ppijcatjonjfany,'standdjsmlssod. • \< Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge