IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 17776 of 2008 Between: Lenkala Sujatha W/o. Ramchandra Reddy R/o.6-5-150, Ravindranagar, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner, Nalgonda Municipality, Nalgonda District, 2 Kolanupaka Shantha Devi W/o. K. Prabhakar Rao R/o.6-5-151, Ravindranagar, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 1st respondent in not taking action against the 2nd respondent's illegal construction in premises No.6-5-151, Ravindra Nagar, Nalgonda by violating sanctioned plan and Municipal Building Rules / Act as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to guidelines issued in G.O.Ms.No.565 dt. 04.11.2006 of the 1st respondent and for a consequential direction to the respondents to take immediate steps on the representation dt. 15.07.2008 of the petitioner and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.SURENDER RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.RADHA KRISHNA POLISETTY (SC FOR MPL) The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 17776 OF 2008 ORDER: 1. The petitioner claims to be the owner of the premises bearing NO.6-5-150, Ravinder Nagar, Nalgonda. The 2nd Respondent namely Kolanupaka Shantha Devi is the owner of the premises bearing NO. 6-5-151 of Ravindernagar, Nalgonda District. 2. When the 2nd respondent constructed building without leaving set backs and making projections towards the house of the petitioner, the petitioner made a representation to the respondent No.1 Municipality on 15-7-2008. Her representation remained unattended. Hence, she approached this Court invoking jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 3. When the writ petition came up for admission, Sri Polishetti Radha Krishna learned standing counsel for Nalgonda Municipality received notice on behalf of the 1st respondent. 4. Learned standing counsel appearing the 1st respondent submits that the 2nd respondent filed W.P.No. 15423 of 2008, complaining the illegal construction being made by this petitioner herein and the said writ petition came to be disposed 7-8- 2008 directing the 1st respondent to consider the representation of the 2nd Respondent and pass appropriate orders. . 5. In view of the limited grievance of the petitioner that the 1st respondent has not considered her representation dated 15-7-2008, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the 1st respondent to consider the representation dated 15- 7-2008 submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders after putting on notice the affected parties. No order as to costs. _____________________________ Justice B.Seshasayana Reddy 14th August, 2008 Note: C.C. in three days B/o KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 17776 OF 2008 14th August, 2008.