IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12569 of 2008 PARBINDRA KUMAR @ PABIND KUMAR, Son of Shesh Narayan Ray, resident of Village- Chandauli, P.S. Pusa, District- Samastipur ----------------- Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the petitioner : None For the State : Smt. Indu Bala Pandey, A.P.P. ------------ 02 21-06-2010 The sole petitioner, while invoking inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has prayed for quashing of the entire proceeding including Chargesheet No.262 of 2007 dated 26.9.2007 submitted in Samastipur (Town) P.S. Case No.410 of 2007 for the offences under Sections 269, 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47(a)(d) (e) (f)( g) of the Excise Act. I have perused the entire petition of the petitioner. From the petition, it is not clear as to whether after filing of the chargesheet cognizance order was passed or not. When the case was called out, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The F.I.R. indicates regarding involvement of the petitioner in the present case. In absence of any specific averment made in the petition regarding pendency of the proceeding, it is difficult to exercise inherent jurisdiction in favour of the petitioner. Accordingly, I do not find any merit in the case and the petition stands rejected. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J )