‘n '-§ Cri ' ' ‘LQ: QF ’h A?T§:‘ ARH A? EEL’FéF‘UR Writ F%€'i§ n £6} E‘is.32" 0' 2633 ~A I n u MuSamw K Agrawa We Mr beugaeh ahemia cmneeE fer me pe aetienezs. Ms Sharmiia Shinghai. ceunse§ f0! reepenzient Ne? Mr $n ev Kenna. Ag'awai . nei Lawyer fa! :espcnden‘x i‘ée‘Ziéi‘iai .1. {$3: Heni‘eie Mr. TP. Sherma, J.) ea R meg (19-7 201 1 ; 8y fhis pe€%t%en undeuv Artmxe 22“]22: of tne Cons .*=' :sn cf inma the peéétieners have chaii nged the iegaiity and {apriety sf ihe 0rd r dated 19 £098 passe b the uvu “edge Ease—ti, at i in Civit Suit Nc.24.é\/2Qi}?, whereby the Csurt -ne:e‘“ nae a missed the appticatien fated under Grater 7" Rate 1": at the Ceee ef brai P ecedure cu t..e grcund that tne prern .. ‘ ne res net party te sate deed is vs d Pgiwoners 1. €3mprak35h Agrawai, ageé about 56 Defendants years San of Ram Kumar Agrawai, ,, L. "l'icuara Agruwa: aged abaut 45 yeai'5 ban ct Praniaq Va; Agrawai 3. Bisa'nu Ram aged abaut 4i year3 Sen of Pmhiad Rai Agrawai 4. ‘Y’Ggesi‘a :wmur Agmwah aged aw: 23 yeam 3a 9f Gm ”zaxasn Agraw l 5. ‘Jijay Kumar Agrawai agaci abaut 34 Year3 Sen of Om Pyakash Agrawai. 6. Shyam Sunder Agmwai, aged abaut 54 years, San of Nanak Chane Agg’awai. 2". Gaur; Shan'Vur Agrawa$ aged abcw‘" 8": Years Son of Nanak (”h nri Aarawal 1% petiiioners Resident sf Véiiage Baradwar Tah‘ Sakti Dist-Janjgir- Cham'pa (Shhatiisgarh‘; Versas Raspsndenis ‘i. “mt Sav" :D iAgrawa§ aged abs ‘ 4E7 Piaiatiif wears daughter o: 8hr: P ah‘nd Q3. Arrnwa! ‘mfe 9f Jegiis” rased Agrawa: resident of Bazar Mohaiia; Tahaii Kaighma BistKcsrha (Chhawsgam) 2. State of $hhattie§a¥h Through:- $eiier?cr Janigirn$hampa DEstJanjgir~ Champa {unhameriam} " we: Pet: Ian riicie 226522?“ of ihe Censtiméien cf indie} not requkec‘ is ciaim the decimation as mm nd ‘ md am is we nder cb§iga€£ n ta pay ad-vaiarem ccurt fees on market ‘ue i nave neard iearned counsei f0. ne pa”. , peruseci ihe owe! impugneci and 0 Wvf wGvhmCf‘i 3 m the iigh‘: 0f tne mczum of Ih Sapfeme mum a” ihg ...a*%e.' of $ur 5(A "mo“ d n NR 251g $i". 28%? t: ai FF Cami-fee need nct be paid en saie cans a suit fc cw ees payabie :s computabie under $ect£en ct that we abngaticn ta ¢Eaim the declaratien as nuii and voic‘. and is not requiree ta ay ad—vaierem court feee, E do not find any iaieeaiity i L. e Greer .mpu ned “Iarremmg "1 .-rence §n exefcise of supewisoryjurisdietion. Censequeniiy, the writ petiiicn bemg devcid of merit £3 i§abie t0 be d§smissed 4k and :i is hefe‘ y a§$ml$SeG. Sd/— T.P Shanna Judge -g: amsaE Singh v. Randmr $5ngh & '3 s su't fsr demamxion JV? suie deea‘ has been executed b am vad ana 'a. jam passessian, i5 n t ) idemtion méntianed L. 339 aeeu3 ?'(I ' {<2} aud ihe pieinnff whe :s rot party *a saie eeed I not under ‘ ‘ l' ‘7; j l