1 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civl Application No. 560 OF 2010 (In W.P. No. 1447/08) Mrs.Jyoti wd/o Sanjay Deshmukh & anr. v. Smt. Bakulabai wd/o Dinkarrao Deshmukh & ors. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's and Registrar's orders orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. S.A. Saoji Advocate for the Applicants. Mrs. Smit Deshpande Advocate for Res. ..... CORAM: A.B.CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 26 th FEBRUARY,_2010. Heard Mr.Saoji, learned counsel for the respondents/applicants. Learned counsel submits that this Court has ordered the respondents to deposit the amount in the appellate court as a precondition for stay when as a matter of fact the appellate court had directed furnishing security. 2. I have gone through the judgment and record of this Court. It is clear from the reasonings that this Court was not inclined to confirm the order of appellate court asking the respondent to furnish security since it was a case involving arrears of maintenance of the wife 2 and consequently the attachment of the property. It is also on record in the judgment that the respondents have 12 acres of agricultural land and they are in a position to deposit the arrears of maintenance and Rs.5,000/- towards litigation expenses as ordered by the court below. The learned counsel then argued that this Court had granted liberty to apply for maintenance and this Court also wanted to furnish security. I do not agree. Rs.25000/- were to be deposited towards arrears of maintenance and the fresh application allowed to be filed related to future maintenance. Therefore, there is no substance in this application. Same is dismissed. No costs. JUDGE /TA/ 3