THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.883 OF 2010 ORDER: This criminal revision case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. by the petitioner aggrieved by the orders dated 27.03.2010 in Crl.M.P.No.1183 of 2009 in M.C.No.289 of 2009 on the file of the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for trial of Jubilee Hills bomb blast case-cum-Additional Family Court, Hyderabad, whereby the learned Judge allowed the petition filed under Section 125(1) Cr.P.C and directed the petitioner herein to pay an amount of Rs.4,000/- to respondent No.1 herein and an amount of Rs.2,000/- each to respondents 2 and 3 herein as interim maintenance pending disposal of the main M.C. case. 2. Heard. 3. The petitioner-husband is a civil engineer. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner has no fixed income and his income varies from time to time. It is also his contention that the first respondent-wife is divorced. All these questions can be considered at the time of final disposal of M.C. I see no grounds to interfere with the order of interim maintenance granted by the trial Court, which would be payable only for a short period as the same is granted on 27.03.2010. However, the trial Court is directed to dispose of the main M.C.No.289 of 2009 itself, within a period of four months from today. In that event, the liability for paying interim maintenance is only for another four months. In case, the petitioner-husband does not cooperate for disposal of M.C. within four months, he shall continue to pay the interim maintenance. In case, the respondents does not cooperate for disposal of M.C. within four months, at the end of four months, payment of interim maintenance shall be stopped. It is for the trial Court to decide as to who is responsible for delay in disposal of M.C. 4. Criminal Revision Case is accordingly disposed of. ___________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. 27th April 2010, Rns.