IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9527 of 2010 GOPAL @ CHANDRA SHEKHAR PAL, S/o Sri Chokh Lal Pal. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 30.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 364, 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is named in the First Information Report on the basis of suspicion having been cast upon him on account of a motive purportedly for non-fulfilment of demands having been made by the petitioner. Admittedly there is no eye-witness to the occurrence. From the impugned order it appears that almost all the witnesses have been examined but today by a supplementary- affidavit it has been stated that out of fourteen charge-sheet witnesses only eight witnesses have been examined and the last witness was examined on 22.10.2008 and thereafter there is a tardy progress in trial. In view of such, let the petitioner above - 2 - named who is in custody since 09.08.2004 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional District & Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-I, Patna in connection with S.Tr. No. 63 of 2005 arising out of Punpun P.S. Case No. 44 of 2004 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)