FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. District : Aurangabad Letters Patent Appeal No. 95 of 2009 With Writ Petition No. 4070 of 2008 (Bharat Jayram Pawar vs. Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Pratishthan Sanchalit, Dr. Headgewar Hospital, Aurangabad & another) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders .............................................................................. Mr. K.A. Kadam, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. R.V. Ghuge, Advocate, for the respondents. .............................................................................. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & R.K. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 20TH JULY 2009 1. In view of subsequent events, nothing survives in the present appeal. The same is, therefore, disposed of, having rendered infructuous. 2. Since the original Writ Petition, out of which the present Letters Patent Appeal arises, was filed challenging the interlocutory order in the Complaint filed by the present Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders appellant, nothing survives in the said Writ Petition also. The same is also disposed of. 3. However, it is made clear that the appellant, petitioner, shall be at liberty to raise all the grounds raised in the petition, at appropriate stage in appropriate proceedings. ( R.K. DESHPANDE ) ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE ................. bgp/lpa95