BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Ninth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.13960 of 2011 1 RAJAMANI 2 RADHAKRISHNAN 3 THANGARAJ 4 R.CHELLADURAI 5 P.CHELLADURAI 6 SANKAR ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 6 Vs THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KEERANUR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT CRIME NO. 290/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.SIVATHILAKAR Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.S.DURAI PANDIAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police in Crime No.290 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police for offences under Sections 147, 148, 188, 341, 506(i) of the Indian Penal Code and 3(i) of the Prevention of Public Property Damages and Loss Act, the petitioners are before this Court seeking Anticipatory Bail. 2.It is alleged that due to election motive, these petitioners damaged the car belonging to the de facto complainant and also attacked him. 3.According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and they have got nothing to do with the alleged offence. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that to show the bona fides of the petitioners, they are prepared to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- each before the (*) learned Judicial Magistrate. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.Having regard to the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and having regard to all other attendant circumstances, including the fact that the investigation should have been made substantial progress by this time, I am inclined to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioners, but with stringent conditions:- 5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Palani, on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall remain at Dindigul and report before Dindigul Town Police Station every day at 10.30 a.m. without fail for a period of four weeks and on further condition that the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- each (Rupees Ten Thousand) before the (*) learned Judicial Magistrate. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. sd/- 09/11/2011 (*) amended as per the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 27.02.2012 by TSJ / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO TO BE SUBSTITUTED FOR THE ORDER ALREADY DESPATCHED 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PALANI 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL DISTRICT 3.THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE DINDIGUL TOWN POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT 4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 5.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KEERANUR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT +One cc to M/s. S.SIVATHILAKAR Advocate SR.No.6339 rl/7c – 10.11.2011 akm/01.03.12 /2p-7c/ ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13960 of 2011 Date :09/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/