«MS.»^ HIGH COURT QF CHHATriSGAR" AT BILASPUR (Division Bench) Coraiu; Hon'blc ShriJagdish BbaUa, Ag.C.J. & Hon'ble Shii Sateh K. .Agnihotri, J. Wnt, "etition (Q No. 4361 of 2007 yv Petitioner U. C-ol •spondeDts Versus 1. !. Shakfii.-al, Aged - 58 years, Son of Late Deena Nafh Prop. - M/s Vivek Enterprises, 1/4, Nelu-u Complex, Vyapar Vihar, King Road, Biiaspur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) Goveminent riu-ough - of India, 'l'lic Joiat Director, Mmistry of Defence, Dte. Gen. Kesettlemeat, West Block IV, R.K.Puram, New Delhi, 110066 2. Bharat Saachar Nigam Liraited Through - Chief Ueneral IVlanager 'i'elecoia, Ciihattisgarh Telecom. Circle, Khamardih, Raipur 492007. 3. The Telecora District ?<lanager, Bharat Sancbar Nigam Limited, Ambikapur (Suiyija )(C.G.) 4. Maj. Angrez Siugh, M/s Foona Securitv Ser'.'ices, C/o Inder Sen Singh, Rooni No. Types II - 8, R.K-Nagar, BSNL Colony, Bilaspur, Uistnct- Bilaspur (C.G.). WRIT PETITOB CBDER ARTICLE 2^ OF THE CONS'HETUTIOII. OP INDIA. Shri R. K. Kesbarivani, Advocate tor fhe petitioner. Shri R. M. Solapurtau-, Advocate for the respondenta No. 3 and 3. / QRALORDER (Passeri on this 9tfa day ofA-iigiist, 2007} The foltowing or'al order ofthe Court is passed by Hoa'ble Jsgdteh BhaHa, Actiag C.J. 1. It has tseeo Briforraeri by Shri R. M. Solapurkar, teamed counsel appearmg for the respondeuts No. 2 and 3 that the process ~has becn started to withdraw the inipiigncd orier dated 7.7.2007 (Annexure P/l), tbat inay take about two weeks. 2. In the Ught of the above sfatement inade by leamed counsel appearing for fhe respondents No. 2 and 3, this petition has become infructuous. 3. Accoriingly, the petition is (lismissied as having become infhictuoiis. Sd/- Acting ChiefJustice Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Th*sr