IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-23904 of 2009 Date of decision : 4.11.2009 Bikramjit Singh Grewal and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents **** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.B.S.Teji, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab Ms. Anita Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.2. S. D. ANAND, J. The parties to the impugned prosecution i.e. petitioners and respondent no.2 have compounded the offences and have placed on record documented compromise, which may be read as Annexure P-1. Petitioners and respondent no.2 are present in the Court and are identified by their respective counsel. They own up the compounding. They further state that presently there is no dispute subsisting between them. Their joint statements has also been recorded separately. In the larger interest of the society and to enable the parties to maintain cordial relations, the petition shall stand allowed and FIR No.203 dated 11.10.2001 under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC registered at Police Station, Sarabha Nagar, Ludhiana (Annexure P-1) shall stand quashed qua the petitioners on account of compounding. Disposed of accordingly. November 04, 2008 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE