IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH MARCH 2011 / 25TH PHALGUNA 1932 RP.No. 127 of 2011(J) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.32862/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): WRIT PETITIONER ------------------------------------- K.E.MOIDU, HILLTOP BUNGALOW, PUTHIYARA, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.C.P.MOHAMMED NIAS RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. P.ABOOBACKER HAJI, DIRECTOR (ADMINISTRATION), HILLTOP PUBLIC SCHOOL, PUTHIYARA, KOZHIKODE-673 004. 2. CORPORATION OF KOZHIKODE, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KOZHIKODE-673 001. 3. THE SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE-673 001. BY SRI.K.D.BABU, SC, CORPORATION OF KOZHIKODE SRI.JAJU BABU FOR R1 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/03/2011 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ----------------------------------------- R.P.No.127 of 2011 in W.P(C).No.32862 of 2010 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th March, 2011 O R D E R The prayer in this review petition filed by the writ petitioner is to review the judgment delivered by me on 6.12.2010 in W.P(C) No.32862 of 2010 by deleting the last sentence therein. The review petition is filed on the apprehension that in view of the last sentence in the judgment, the Secretary, Kozhikode Corporation may not insist on the first respondent applying for approval of the site. When this review petition came up for hearing on 11.3.2011, the learned standing counsel appearing for the Kozhikode Corporation was directed to get instructions as to whether the first respondent has applied for approval of the site. When the review petition came up for hearing today, Sri.K.D.Babu, learned standing counsel appearing for the Kozhikode Corporation, submitted on instructions that applications for building permit involve approval of the site also and therefore, the apprehension entertained by the review petitioner is misplaced. In such circumstances as the Corporation has not dispensed with the need R.P.No.127 of 2011 in W.P(C).No.32862 of 2010 -:2:- for approval of the site, I am of the opinion that the apprehension entertained by the petitioner is without any basis. I therefore find no grounds to entertain the review petition. The review petition fails and is accordingly dismissed. P.N.RAVINDRAN, Judge. ahg. P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. --------------------------- R.P.No.127 of 2011 in W.P(C).No.32862 of 2010 ---------------------------- O R D E R 16th March, 2011