IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION NO.10009 of 2009 Between: 1 Sri S,Venkata Murali S/O.Koteswara Rao, R/O.Plot No.132, Flat No.102 Sri Vishnupriya Enclave, Motinagar, Hyderabad. 2 SMT,S.Sita Mahalakshmi W/O.S.Venkata Murali, R/O.Plot No.132, Flat No.102 Sri Vishnupriya Enclave, Motinagar, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND Union Bank Of India Limited Rep by its Authorised Officer, Lakdika Pul, Saifabad, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to To issue a writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus , or any other appropraite writ, declaring the action of the respondent herein in notconsidering the petitioner's objections dated 10-11-2008 in terms of the procedure comtemplated under section 13(2) of Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets andf enforcement of Security interest Act 54 of 2002 as illegal, arbitary and contrary to section 13(2) of Securitization and Reconstruction of FInancial Assets and enforcementof Security interest Act 54 of 2002 and consequently direct the respondent to consider the petitioner objections in terms of procedure comtempleted under section 13(2) of Securitization and Reconstruction of Final Assetsand enforcement of Security interest Act 54 of 2002 and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.GANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.B.S.PRASAD The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION NO.10009 of 2009 ORDER: (Per Ghulam Mohammed, J) This court has admitted this writ petition and passed an interim order on 13-05-2009 directing that the auction may go on, but the same shall not be confirmed subject to condition that the petitioners deposit Rs.7,00,000/- (Rupees seven lakhs only) within four weeks. It is represented by the learned counsel for the respondent-Bank that the petitioners have not complied with the said conditional order. Now the learned counsel for the petitioners has filed an application dated 27-07-2009 seeking permission of the court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. __________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J ____________________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J 30th July, 2009 pn THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.10009 of 2009 30th July, 2009