1 CA 1221 OF 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1221 OF 2011 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 437 OF 2010 Pratibha Sanjay Choudhari & another Applicants V E R S U S Harihar Padmakar Patil and others Respondents Mr. Vikram Undre, Advocate holding for Mr. P.R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate for the applicants Mr. K.C. Sant, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. S.D. Kaldate, AGP for respondents No. 2 & 3 CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATED : 1st February, 2011 PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. The applicants are not necessary parties to the contempt petition which is filed against the Collector of Jalgaon, who was directed to decide certain complaints made by the petitioner against the present applicants and few others. The present applicants are trying to get themselves impleaded in the contempt petition on the ground that because of the pendency of this petition, the Collector is unnecessarily hurrying up the proceedings and is denying them an opportunity of being heard. Even if this complaint has substance, the 2 CA 1221 OF 2011 same is outside the scope of the present petition. In fact, if the present applicants have any grievance against the manner in which the Collector is deciding the complaints, they have independent cause of action for proceeding against the Collector at appropriate forum. in view of this, Civil Application stands rejected. ( A.V. NIRGUDE, J. ) SRM/ca/1221/11/1/2/11