IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13170 of 2005 1. Amreshwar Nath Mishra @ Nanhak Mishra, Son of Late Banshropan Mishra, Resident of Village+ P.O.-Durgadih, P.S.-Bikramganj, District- Rohtas. 2. Umesh Mishra, Son of Raghubansh Mishra, Resident of Village+P.O.- Durgadih, P.S.-Bikramganj, District-Rohtas. ….Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The District Magistrate, Rohtas. 3. The Certificate Officer, Rohtas. 4. The Assistant Mining Officer, Rohtas. 5. The Circle Officer, Bikramganj, Rohtas. ……Respondents. ----------- 2. 29.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging the proceeding of Certificate Case No. 39 of 1998- 99, Certificate Case No. 77 of 2001-02 and Certificate Case No. 198 of 2001-02 claiming that without serving notice upon him, warrant of arrest has been issued and he is being subjected to severe harassment, only because of the mis-conception regarding the petitioner’s nickname. 3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this petition with a liberty to file objection under Section 9 of the Bihar and Orrisa Public Demand Recovery Act, 1914 before the Certificate Officer, Rohtas and Gaya. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with the said liberty. However, if objection under Section 9 of the Act is filed by the petitioners along with a copy of this order and 2 all the requisites within 15 days from today, the said authorities shall decide the same and pass speaking order in accordance with law under Section 10 of the Act expeditiously. Till the said order under Section 10 is passed by the authorities concerned, no coercive steps shall be taken by the authorities against the petitioner. Kamlesh (S.N. Hussain, J.)