1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.114 OF 2009 Bapusaheb G. Chile .. Petitioner V/s Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & anr. ..Respondents Mr.S.M.Sakhardande i/b.Mr.P.H.Dharmadhikari, Advocate, for the petitioner Mrs.Geeta Joglekar, Advocate, for the respondent No.1 – MCGM Mr.Shailesh More, AGP, for the respondent No.2 – State CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATE : 6TH MARCH, 2009 P.C. . The contempt alleged is that by issuing notice under Section 488 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act the officers of the respondent No.1 – MCGM have breached and violated the Order dated 24th November, 2008, passed in First Appeal No.2185 of 2008. 2. The learned counsel for the respondent No.1 – MCGM on 2 instructions of the concerned officer i. e. Assistant Engineer Mr. Jambotkar makes a statement that the notice issued to above the petitioner is concerned is withdrawn as it was issued through inadvertence. In view of the said statement, Mr.S.M.Sakhardande, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner does not desire to prosecute the above Contempt Petition which is accordingly disposed of. (R.M.SAVANT, J.)