IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.390 of 2009 Raj Kumar, son of Shri Laddu Lal Singh, resident of Mohalla Parao Pokhar Lane No.2, P.S. Kazi, Mohammadpur, District- Muzaffarpur ----- Applicant/Petitioner. Versus Smt.Arti Kumari, wife of Raj Kumar, resident of Mohalla- Parao Pokhar, Lane No.2, P.S. Kazimohammadpur, District- Muzaffarpur and D/O Shri Sohan Lal Singh, residing in Government P.H.E.D. Quarter in Mohalla- Bank Road, P.S. Town, District- Muzaffarpur ---- O.P--- Opposite Party. ---------------------------------- 3. 22.11.2011 Heard Mr. Ram Babu Rai for the petitioner. This civil revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by the applicant of Matrimonial Case No. 117 of 2003 ( Raj Kumar Vs. Smt. Arti Kumari), for dissolution of their marriage by a decree of divorce between the parties. By the impugned order dated 23.12.2008, passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Muzaffarpur, the applicant’s application to implead the paramour of the opposite party has been rejected. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner. It appears to us that the amendment application has been disallowed, inter alia, on the ground that though 2 the requisite averment has been made in the plaint, the applicant himself has not stated anything to that effect in his affidavit, nor any one of the four witnesses examined on his behalf have said anything to that effect. Secondly, the amendment application has been filed after four witnesses have been examined. Thirdly, the learned Family Court is of the view that this is a scandalous and a frivolous application. We agree with the reasoning assigned by the learned Principal Judge in rejecting the amendment application. The civil revision application is dismissed. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar, J.)