BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty First day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.12573 of 2011 1. RASU 2. MURUGAN 3. MURUGAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 3 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALAIYANOOR POLICE STATION, THIRUPPUVANAM UNION, MANAMADURAI TALUK, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.70/2011. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.UDHAYAKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 3 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b) and 506(ii) I.P.C. in Crime No.70 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was charged under Sections 294(b) and 506(ii) I.P.C. in Crime No.70 of 2011. He further submitted that on the basis of a complaint given by the first petitioner the case in Crime No.69 of 2011 was registered under Sections 147,148,294(b),323,324, and 506(ii) IPC on 12.09.2011 and it is a case in counter and hence, they pray for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that it is a case in counter and the investigation is going on and hence he prays for dismissal of this application. 4.Considering the rival submissions made on both sides, it is seen that on the basis of complaint given by the petitioner a case in Crime No.69 of 2011 was registered under Sections 147,148,294(b),323,324, and 506(ii) IPC and even though the petitioners were not arrested they neither interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate Court, Manamadurai, Sivagangai District and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate Court, Manamadurai, Sivagangai District, and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. sd/- 21/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE DISTRICT MUNSIF-CUM-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MANAMADURAI. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SIVAGANGAI. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALAIYANOOR POLICE STATION, THIRUPPUVANAM UNION, MANAMADURAI TALUK, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. R.UDHAYAKUMAR Advocate SR.No.32480 SR : 23.09.2011 : 2p/6c ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12573 of 2011 Date :21/09/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/