CWP.No. 1476/2007. 24.4.2010. Present: Mr.R.P.Singh, Asstt. Advocate General for the petitioners. Mr. Devinder Ghosh, vice counsel for the Respondent. The State challenge the order passed by the learned Administrative Tribunal in Original Application No. 3383 of 2003. The operative order of the Tribunal reads as under: “ In view of the above settled position of law by the Division Bench of this Tribunal and the facts and circumstances of the case, respondents are directed to give work charge status to the applicant from the date he has completed 10 years of continuous service with minimum 240 days in each calendar year with all consequential benefits. This order be implemented within two months from the date of this order.” It is not disputed before us that the respondent herein, who was the petitioner before the Tribunal was engaged as daily waged beldar in the year 1991. In this view of the matter, the case is squarely covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court in Mool Raj Upadhyaya Vs. State of H. P. and Ors. 1994 Supp (2) SCC 316. We do not find any basis of ground to invoke the decision of the Supreme Court in State of Karnataka Vs. Uma Devi and others (2006) 4 SCC 1. Consequently, there is no merit in this writ petition and the same is dismissed. All the miscellaneous applications are also disposed of. Interim stay shall stand vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. (Dev Darshan Sud),J. (Kuldip Singh),J April 24,2010(R)