1 14 caw 1506.11.doc K IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1506 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6096 OF 1996 Chairman, Shad Adam Shaikh Trust & Anr. .. Applicants Vs. Director of Vocational Education & Training & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. L.L. Dsouza for the applicants Mr. P.G. Sawant. B Panel for respondent nos.1 to 3 ‘ ’ CORAM: K.K. TATED, J. DATE: 5th AUGUST, 2011 PC: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Applicants and the learned AGP for Respondent no.1 to 3. 2. Though Respondent no.4 is duly served through his advocate Mr. Mihir Desai, no one present when the matter is called out for hearing. 3. This Application is preferred by original Petitioner for recalling the order dated 15th October, 2010 passed by this court (Coram: Smt. Nishita Mhatre, J.) by which the Petition dismissed for default. 2 14 caw 1506.11.doc 4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of Applicants states that initially, the Applicant handed over vakalatnama for filing in the present case through advocate Mr. L.L. D souza. He submits that ’ the advocate Mr..D souza was unwell for a long time and during ’ the relevant period he was under treatment of Dr. Nilesh Shah and therefore, inadvertently, oversight the vakalatnama was not handed over to the concerned in the present case. 5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of Applicants and averments made in the Civil Application, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) which reads thus: (a) “ Order dated 15th October, 2010 passed by the Hon ble Smt. Justice Nishita Mhatre be set aside ’ and petition be restored on file. ” 6. Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. (K.K.TATED,J.)