CWP(T) No. 11325 of 2008 17.5.2010 Present:- Mr. C.N.Singh, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. P.K.Sharma, counsel for the respondents. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the respondents have taken the stand that petitioner has been regularized w.e.f. 1.1.1999 as Inquiry Attendant. The petitioner has submitted that he may be regularized w.e.f. 1.1.1994. The petitioner has worked on different posts from 1983 onwards. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has not very clearly projected his case for work-charge status in accordance with Mool Raj Upadhayay Vs. State of H.P. 1994(2) S.L.R. 377 in the petition. He has submitted that petitioner is entitled to work charge status in accordance with Mool Raj Upadhayay after 10 years of service but his case for work charge has not been clearly pleaded. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner may be allowed to withdraw the petition with liberty to file fresh petition for appropriate relief on the same cause of action. Prayer granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition on the same cause of action. CMP(T) No. 1725 of 2008 Infructuous in view of disposal of the main petition. May 17, 2010. ( Kuldip Singh ) (GR) Judge.