IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 1003 of 2008 Ajab Singh and another ……. Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ….. Respondents Mr. Mohd. Umar, Advocate vice Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. JUDGMENT Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Mohd. Umar, Advocate vice Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. 2. Learned Brief Holder for the State submits before this Court that it has been indicated in para 2 of the counter affidavit that the police has completed the investigation and after completion of investigation the police has found that there is a prima-facie case against the petitioners, namely Ajab Singh and Sispal @ Sis, and as such the police has submitted the chargesheet before the Circle Officer concerned against the petitioners. It was submitted that in view of above the writ petition filed by petitioners seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against them has, now, become infructuous. The police is likely to submit the chargesheet against the petitioners before the court in the near future. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. However, interim order dated 16.12.2008 shall remain operative till the final report is filed before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 27.03.2009 LSR