Accused Resbandents ComDiainant HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BIU*SPUR Cr.M.Phto.SB? of2009 1. Sn't.Nusreen Bano, &/o tourtuza Mujthaba, Aged about 60 years, Occ'.HouSe w'rfe : 2. Syed Kumail Jaafri, S/o Syed AtohctBiimed, Aged about 21 years, Occ: :Stucient.!,. . ;.,: : ' ' ' '. ; 3. Syed Sohail © Syed Mohammed Haneef Jeorfri S/o Syed ttohammed Naqut, Aged auout 30 years, A I! R/o H.No.5-4-640, Ffct No.210. KB Arca'de, Behind Annapuma Hotei, Hyderabad. 4. Syed Sameena Ali ftaza, D/o Ali Mirza, Aged about 30 yeqrs, R/o Blandra, Befaind Lelavati Hos^ital, Kose ffimw .Builying.T4^ FI)30i',8oBnboy. l' Vepsus :'1-':'' ! . . 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Poliee Station-Mohila Thana, Raipur, Distt.Raipur (C6) 2. Smt.Syedc Neha Aabidi, \V./o Syed Suhail @ Syed AAohammeei Haneef Jaafri, Aged dbout22 years, Qcc;i"iouS&. wife, Presently residing at 1-loyse No.34/670, Fowarra ChouA, Bairan Bazar, Raipur (C6) (Petition under Sectjo" 482 of the Gr.P-C-) (SB: Hon'btsMr-T.P. Shorma. J.) greserit:- ' , • . • . '' :,,.' ,,„ Mrs.Fouzia M.tr'zc wi1+i AAs Fai'oh Minhaj, counsel for the petitioners. Mr.Avinoish K.AAishra, Poinel Jawyer for respondemt Nfel/State. ORALCWOER (Passed on 3 November. 200% : .1. The petitioners heve fiied this petition for quashment of the • , registered at Police Statton-Mah'la Thano, Rdipur- in Criine No. '^ Fa.R. !ai .^4^1 -2.- dated 29.6.2009 against the petitioners for •Ae offence punishable under Section 498-A/34 of the Indism Penat Code- 2- I have heard learned counse! for the parties and perused the copy of the F.I-R- and other documents filed on behalf of the petitioners. 3. Learned counsel f"r the petitioners submits that entire causeof action arose at Hydr-abad and not within the territorial jurisdiction of the court situated at Raipur- 4. On the other hond, learried counsel for rsspondent No.l/State opposes the p?tit'on cnd submits thht twe cou^ of action also arose wi1+)i" the jurisdiction of the cour't situated at Kaipur'. "- '. 5- From perusa! of copy of the F.I.R-, it appears that part of cause of action of the offence has clso been carose with!" the te itorial jurisdiction of the court si+uated at Raipur and the F.I.K. lodged at Rcipur is within the jur'isdiction of Polics Station-MohilaThcina, Raipur. I do "ot find omy scope of interfsrence in exercise of extraordinar" inherent jurisdiction. 6. Consequently, the petition is dismissedat the motion stage itself. Sd/- T.P. Sha^na Judge /