IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH JULY 2010 / 23RD ASHADHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 3524 of 2010() ---------------------------------------- CRIME NO.308 OF 2010 OF MANGALAPURAM POLICE STATION. .......... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED: ---------------------------------------- 1. SHAHUL, S/O.BASHEER, PUTHUVAL VILA VEEDU, KURAKKADA P.O., KIZHUVILOM, CHIRAYINKEEZHU. 2. BAIJU, S/O.BABU, BAIJU BHAVAN, THETTICHIRA, KURAKKADA P.O., AZHOOR, CHIRAYINKEEZHU. 3. ANEESH, S/O.DEVARAJAN, RAMANI MANDIRAM, KAILATHUKONAM, KURAKKADA P.O. 4. THARIS, S/O.CHANDRA BABU, ALUVILA VEEDU, KURAKKADA P.O., KAILATHUKONAM, MANGALAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR SRI.G.BIJU RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANTS & STATE: --------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE CIRCLE INSEPCTOR OF POLICE, KAZHAKKOOTTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANGALAPURAM POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZE THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.HEMA, J. ------------------ B.A. No. 3524 of 2010 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 14th day of July, 2010 O R D E R Petition for anticipatory bail. 2. According to prosecution, petitioners(A1 to A3) were arrested on 23.05.2010 alleging offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act. They were released on bail by the Magistrate Court. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that petitioners are involved in Crime no. 308/2010 of Mangalapuram Police Station and they were arrested and released on bail. No other crime is registered at the same police station against petitioners and hence anticipatory bail cannot be granted. These submissions are recorded. 3. However, petitioners counsel submitted that petitioners were brutally assaulted by first respondent, when they were arrested in Crime No. 308/2010 of Mangalapuram Police Station. Petitioners also got admitted in Government Ayurveda Hospital and they were in the hospital on 26.05.2010. Fourth petitioner was also admitted in that hospital for treatment, it is submitted. 4. According to petitioners, in the night on 26.05.2010 some offences were committed by some persons and three crimes B.A. No. 3524 of 2010 2 were registered by second respondent. First respondent and police men came to the hospital and threatened that petitioners will be arrested in connection with those cases and that is why this petition is filed. 5. On hearing both sides and in the light of the submissions made by learned Public Prosecutor,I find that the apprehension of arrest is baseless. Hence, anticipatory bail cannot be granted. Petition is dismissed. K. HEMA, JUDGE ln