C \7 / S.B. (Service er) BILASPUR IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT pETITION (S) No. { gr 2+201 1. usanna Bhagat, wife of B.R.Bhagat, aged about 46 years, Asst. Teacher, » Primary School Charkhapara, Block Dharamjaigarh, District Raigar Chhattisgarh. ’ETITIONER: P Versus State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattlsgarh ‘ / 2 Dlstnct Educatnon Officer, Ratgarh Dlstnct Ralgarh Chhatusgarh / 3. Jomt Dlrector, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raigarh, District Raigarh, C.G. Respondents II\ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA g a’? ’ / S h, Am3? @ HIGH COURT OF CHHA'ITISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 152 of2011 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: ‘Shri Han‘sh Khutiya, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondents. ORDER ORAL (Passed' on 13 day of January, 2011) 1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to pay two advance increments on account of passing B.Ed. examination, on his own expenses, before entering into service. 2. Shri Khutiya, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the present case is no longer res integra as the same has been considered and decided by Supreme Court in Asha Saxena v. State ofM.P. & Ors.’ as well as by this Court in the this Court in the matter of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj v. Municipal ‘ Corporation, Durg and anotherz and Gopesh Kumar Vemm v. The State Govt. ofChham'sgarh and another] . 1 2009 (m) MPJR (SC) 59 2 3 2005 (i1) MPJR CG 96 WP (S) No.4130 of2005 PETITIONER : Susanna Bhagat. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. @ 3. Shri Khutiya further submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decisions as aforestated Thus, the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to decide his case in the light of aforestated decision, subject to verification ofthe fact asto whether the petitioner has acquired B.Ed certificate on his own expenses before entering into service. Leamed counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with law and in the light ofthe decision of Supreme Court in Asha Swcena (supra) and ofthis Court in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj and Gopesh Kumar Verma (supra), Within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 5. In View of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appean'ng for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. fM, Satish K. Agnihotri Sd/—' Judge .