•8® •< ^ ^ 1..'^0' ct- '/<7b2- IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE. CHHATTISGARH At BD.ASPUR Writ Petition (s) No. / 2006 PETITIONER : ^^ ^^' ^y^ ,^'y /' ^•\^ ..-••" y RESPQNDENTS : Yersus G. D. KADA , S/Late Shri. Nathoo Ram Kada Aged about 59 Years, Empkiyed as Manager, District Trade & Industries Central Janjgir-Champa. Residing at: 94, Jawahar Nagar, DURG(CG) State of Chhattisgarh Through: The Director, Directorate oflndustries, 2nd Floor, L.I.C. Building, Pandri, RAIPUR - 492004 (CG) The Director,, Directorate oflndustries, 2n<iFloor,L.I.C.Buildmg, Pandri, RAIPUR- 492004 (CG) TheCoIlector,. Collectorate Office, Janjgir-Chamua Dist: Janjgir-Champa (CG) The General Manager. District Trade & Industries Center, Champa (TO) Dt. Janjgir-Champa (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/2270F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FQR_jrHE ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE OKDER AND_^reECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARY. MANDAMUS ETC. ^- «sa ^i^i^ fe^^^^^ ^l s^^®^? ^^^^''s^ ^^®?0?; ^®rQ:$^: S^^KssS^ ^^IS"'^:SKS,S. ^^^y^S^i '•^^Sf^- BS^3%?S:y? '-'ff^ BS??@^;^^;,? XI HC 78 ^mcn sh*itqi 3^'BrprRpr, ®Tflt)<ie,isi<aiyy ri3,.^f?..^.0l. O^ ^ 200 3TT^?T Macft ('iyt^si^'g') sn^T^f^TRT (raTan^TgiiiN; Roshan/i ^i ^ "y STcITWBfgg'STI^T 29.8.2006 Shri B.P. Rao, Advocate for -tfie petitioner. Shri Vinoy Pandey, P.L. for t^ Hewd. By this writ petition the p^titioner has prcyed that respondent No.3- Cotlector, Janjgir-Chompa be dlre^ted to decide the representotion of the petitioner dated 20.3.2006 (Amex^re P-3). The case of the petitioner i^ that on the complaint of respondent No.4, pespondent No.3 has imposed tl^ order the petitioner has mode a r^ reqaondent No.3 be directed to de ^rprfepfrr WtRrf ?'te^l'iJ^resTC ^; stl^ir sfT^r e respondents on Mlvanee copy. e penatty of withholding of one annual increment on the petitioner and 'th^rt' penalty has been imposed without hotding any enquiry or issuing any show cau^e notice to the petitioner. A9<Mnst the sud presentation to respondent No.3, but he is not decidin9 the same. In the circumstance, le<rn4d counsel for the petitioner submits that :ide the representation of the petitjoner in accordanee with law, to iwhich le^rned Ponel Lawyer for the State has no objection. Having heord leamed couns^l for •the pcrties and having regard to the focts and circumstcnces of the cos^, respondent No.3 is directed to decide the representation (Annexure P-3) of t(ie petitioner in accordance with Imi within a period of 30 days •from 1+»edate of receipt of copy of this order. With the direction aforesai<j Certified copy as per rules. , the petition stonds disposed of. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge WSS'^^^^