c^'^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CCHHATTISGARH1 W.P. (Sl No, \Y-\^_ /201.0 PETITIONER Smt. Dhanlaxmi Kurup,W/o. Shri T.V. Mohan Kump, aged about 52 years, R/o. Village - Palli, Post - Kumharavan, Tahsil - Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : /(l) -.•^. ^€ll° /^~\^ ^•^^ /-' (2) <\;- • (3) \^ State of Chhattisgarh, through its secretary, Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes Welfare Department, D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Collector Tribal Department, District Bastar, Jagdalpur (C.G.) Mata Rukhmani Seva Sansthan, through its President, Mata Rukhnaa&i Seva Saasthan Dimarapal, District Bastar (C.G.) Secretaiy, Mata Rukhmani Seva Sansthan Diruarapai, District Bastar (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 THE_CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA (4) fflGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILA8PUR WRTT PETmON fS) No. 1147 of2010 PETITIONER : Smt. Dhanlaxmi Kurup. VERSUS KESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarii & Others. WMT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Ue Shri Sattsh K. Aznihotri. J. Present: Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate fw the petftioaer. Shri Alok Bakshi, G.A. forthe State/respondent 1 & 2. ORALORDER (Passed on 22°d day of March, 2010) With Ifae consent ofthe parties, the matter is heanl finally. 1. Leamed counsel appearing fw the petitioner sulmuts that the instant petition is squarely covared by the dedsion ofthis Court raidered in Smt. A.Lall v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others^, thns the petitiuier may be pennitted to make a representation to decide his case ia the U^rt of aforestated decision, subjeet to verifieation asto whether the respondent No. 3 and 4-Institute is a Govemmeat Aided school and tiie petitifflier is a teacher within the sanctioned strength. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the State/respoalents 1 and 2 sutmats that in the event, the petitioner make a representation, the same will be c<Misidered and decided, in accordance with law, within a period offour weeks Irom the date ofreeeipt ofthe represeirtation. 3. In view of foregoing, according to Ae leamed coimsel appeaivag for the petitionere, nothing survives in this petition for adjudicatian. 4. Accordingly, tiie \wit petition is disposed of. i Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^ Anrit ' 20)7 (1)BU 265