1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.116 OF 1999 Rajendra S. Warkhede ...Petitioner v/s Air India Ltd. And others ...Respondents Mr S. Mahadeshwar for Petitioner. Mr Firoz Bharucha i/b M/s Mulla and Mulla and Cariagie Blunt and Caroe for Respondent No.1. Mr S.C. Pal for Respondent No.2. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND R.G. KETKAR JJ. DATE : 20TH JULY 2009. 2 P.C. :- 1] According to the petitioner, he was one of the petitioner in writ petition No.2953 of 1990 which has been disposed off by order dated 18th December 1997 passed by the Division Bench of this Court. According to the petitioner, by that order, Security Guards who were actually working with Air India on 6th December 1996 have been given all the benefits, but the petitioner was not actually working with Air India on that date i.e. 6th December 1996. According to him, though he was entitled for the benefit of interim order dated 26th October 1990 passed by this Court. By this petition, the petitioner is claiming all the benefits given by order dated 18th December 1997. If the petitioner s case was covered by order dated 18th December 1997 and if the petitioner was one of the petitioners in writ petition No.2953 of 1990, these facts should have been pointed out when that petition was decided or proceedings should have been taken for modification of that order. Filing an 3 independent petition after two years of the order, in our opinion, cannot be the remedy for seeking modification of the order. No relief therefore can be granted to the petitioner. Petition therefore fails, rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary of this Court. Certified copy expedited. ( JUSTICE D.K. DESHMUKH ) ( JUSTICE R.G. KETKAR )