IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1420 of 2008 THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS Versus SRI JAGDISH CHANDRA VERMA ----------- 2 21-08-2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Union of India. Nobody appears on behalf of sole respondent. It has been submitted that although a peremptory order was passed leading to dismissal of Tax case no. 15/03 for failure of the petitioner to disclose the parentage of sole respondent but plea has been taken that in spite of looking into all the relevant records the parentage of respondent no.2 could not be found. In that circumstance learned counsel had removed the defect by mentioning that parentage is not known. In the facts and circumstances, let defect no.6 be ignored for the present. The Union of India should try to utilize its agencies to find out the parentage of respondent no.2 at the earliest and provide it to the court whenever it is available. This application for restoration is allowed and Tax case no. 15/2003 is restored to its original file. BKS/ (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (M. Saran, J.)