X K s l i ~ . 2 PETITIONER IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S) No. 5‘2? OF / Haridwar Vishw years, S/ o. retired Assistant Bandhwapara, Shri .D. Vishwakarnia, Compressor Operator Satbahaniya Mandir Road, New Sarkanda, Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus / :1) The State of Ghhattisgarh, through the Secretaryi, Department of Agrlcultural DKS Bhawan, Ralpur Dlstrlct Ralpur (C G ) . :2) The Accountant (C.G.) 3 LE BENW ‘2010 akarma, aged about6‘7 “z. ESPONbENTs / :3) The Agricultural Engineer (Drilling) Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) OF THE, CONSTITUTION OF IN DIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT WRITS ORDER ORDERS DIRECTI‘og/DIRECTIONS etc. WRITv PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 i v l General, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District Raipur : R - l > RESPONDENTS : The state ofChhauisgarh & Others.‘ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR I ‘ WRIT PETITION (S) No 527 of2010 V x \ z a l s VERSUS ! 5 ni B. Hon’ble Shrl Satish K. Ag i Shn A1111 Mourya, Advocate for the petmoner ’i‘ 1 Shn A.V Shndhar Panel Lawyer for the State j Shrl R Pradhan, Advocate for the respondent No 2 ‘ Present: ORAL ORDER a ; r (Passed on 04 day of February, 2010) u W1th the consent of learned counsel appeanng for the partles, the matter l 1s heard fma1ly Learned counsel appearmg for the pennoner submits that the case, bemg payment of retlral benefts matter, may be referred to the pens1onk r committee Th1s Court m the matter of W P No 4642/2004 (Baynath Mandal v The State of Chhattzsgarh & Others) and other connected matters, V dtrected the Comrmttee'to cons1der the matter. of retlralgdues as the d1sputed quesnon of facts were mvolved The Comrmttee was . constrtuted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19 06 2006 passed 1n W P No 1961/2006 (Smt Keja Ba1 Chandrakar » Vs State Government and others) and order dated 13 03 2008 passed m M c c No 105 of 2008 (State: of Chhamsgarh & Orhers v. Baynath ; Mandal and another) Thus thrs petmon 1s squarely covered by the judgnent and order dated 315‘ of January, 2008 passed 1n W P No ' PETITIONER : Handwar V1shwakarma i _ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARHCLE 226 OF THE CONS I‘I I‘UTION OF INDIA i > 4642/2004 Baijnath Mandal (supra) as $ubn1itted by learned counsel K x i appearing for the parties. ‘ :Wi‘ih the cons®t of the parties, this petitiEon is accérdingly disposed ’of l i V in the same terms i.e. the office of the A£;ivocate ‘Geheral is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a pieriod of 15 days h'om the date V of receipt of a copy of the petition homithe petitioner and this order. Thereatter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and the otticers concemed, within a titrther period of 15 days. The Committee )shall consider and pass order, in accordance with law, aiter affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the 'oificers concerned may file additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner be completed within a peliod offour months from the date of '- receipt of a copy ofthis order. The petitioner shall supply extra copy of the petition to the learned f counsel appearing for the respondents for forwarding the same to the ’ Committee.