'^s^^sa^gs^si^se^s IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) C.R. No. PA /2005 aH'r!! 1^»; APPLICANT RESPONDENT /Municipal Corporation (SADA) Tahsil & District Korba (C.G.) VERSUS NON-APPLICANT : /NationalThermal Power APPELLANT Q, Corporation Limited Darri, TahsU I|/^-~SE Distt. Korba.-(C.G.) ^ CIVIL REVISION UNDER SECTION 115 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE .A ,•• / QZVT/ }W / ,•''// //7 <, A_^L^ Feeline aeerievecl_by the order dated 19.10.2004 passed by the learned ^Additional District Judge, Korba (C.G.l in M.C.A. <s^ no. 4/93. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR APPLICANT RESPONDENTS C.R. No. 1/2005 Municipal Corporation (SADA) Versus National Thermal Power Corporation Limited, Darri. SB:- HON'BLE SHRI N.K. AGARWAL. J PRESENT:- Shri B.L. Dembra, Advocate, for applicant. Shri P.S. Koshy with Shri Vivek Verma, Advocate for the respondents. 1. 2. 3. 4. ORAL ORDER (2-2-2011) Heard finally. This petition is directed against the order dated 19-10- 2004 passed by the Additional District Judge, Korba in M.C.A. No. 4/93. The applicant has confined its challenge to the order irapugned to the extent whereby learned court below has directed the authority to assess/levy property tax on the respondent at the rate of between 6 to 10 % of fhe annual letting value as may be determined by the Corporation for each financial year whereas as per law prevailing at that time, the property tax can be assessed at the rate of between 6 to 20 % of the annual letting value as may be determined by the Corporation for each financial year. The prayer to the above extent was not opposed by the respondent. In view of specific provision under Section 135 of the .''Mynicipal Corporation Act prevailing at fhat time, the prayer made by the petitioner is allowed to the above extent and it is directed that the applicant is entitled to assess/levy property tax on the respondents at the rate not less than 6% and not more than 20% of the annual •::-'-k»,^ ~\ "%1," Z. ^ ^B,-?;-*^^ ;! | ^y letting value as may be determined by the applicant for each financial year. 5. Remaining part of the order shall remain intact. 6. Since the matter is old, the applicant is directed to decide the matter expeditiously. 7. The revision is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge