IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45392 of 2007 BIBHEESAN SHARMA….PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. SRI DHANANJAY PRASAD …………OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 6. 10.11.2008. This application has been filed for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to opposite party no. 2 by learned Sessions Judge, Patna vide order dated 2.7.2007 passed in A.B.A. No.1608 of 2007. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that opposite party no. 2 has obtained anticipatory bail on wrong submission of papers with regard to loss of business. However, on perusal of the impugned order dated 2.7.2007 it appears that apart from that there are several grounds which have been mentioned in the impugned order for granting anticipatory bail. This case is also based on complaint petition as well as deed of agreement. Under the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere in the impugned order. Accordingly, this application is rejected. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)