IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23401 of 2010 RAY SINGH @ RAM SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 09.07.2010 Petitioner is languishing in jail in connection with a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 139, 324, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. The specific case of the informant in the F.I.R. is that one Jai Kumar Bharti made two gun shot firing on the informant causing injuries on the left elbow and lower portion of the abdomen. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though petitioner is named in the F.I.R. but no specific overt act has been alleged against the petitioner. However, from the impugned order, it appears that during investigation the witnesses have specifically named the petitioner as one of the assailants. Learned counsel for the State, however does not controvert this fact that in the F.I.R. the specific overt act is alleged against Jai Kumar Bharti and not against the petitioner. Considering the fact that in the F.I.R. there is no specific overt act alleged against the petitioner, let the petitioner namely Ray Singh, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two 2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Salkhua P.S. Case No. 188 of 2009. The learned Trial Court will be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner if he fails to appear on three consecutive dates. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)