1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.02.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2292 of 2011 A.Rupesh Krishnan ... Petitioner Vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Nagercoil, Kanyakumar District. ... Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondent police not to harass the petitioner and his family members with regard to the false complaint filed by said Mrs.Tamaraiselve @ Deepa. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sankar For Respondent : Mr.L.Murugan Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER This petition has been filed to direct the respondent police not to harass the petitioner and his family members with regard to the false complaint filed by Mrs.Tamaraiselve @ Deepa. 2. Heard Mr.M.Sankar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.L.Murugan, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing on behalf of the respondent. 3. According to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner and his family members were harassed by the respondent under the guise of enquiry and therefore, the respondent may be directed to follow the norms to be followed for doing interrogation and suitable orders may be passed for not harassing the petitioner and his family members. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit in his argument that petition enquiry is pending against the petitioner and the respondent police has to enquire the petitioner and there is no harassment against the petitioner and his family members and if any interrogation is needed by the respondent against the petitioner, the norms which are mentioned in the Judgement of Hon'ble Apex Court in D.K.Basu Vs. State of West Bengal reported in AIR (1997) SC 610, would be followed in case of interrogation or any further investigation. He would further submit that there will not be any harassment and if any enquiry or interrogation, it would be done in accordance with law. 5. According to the submissions made by the learned Government https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 Advocate, there was no harassment by the respondent against the petitioner and his family members. He would also state that there would not be any harassment in future also. 6. Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) that the respondent police will not harass the petitioner and his family members in future under the guise of any enquiry, this petition is closed with a direction to the effect that there shall be no harassment to the petitioner and his family members on the side of the respondent police and they are to follow the dictum laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in D.K.Basu Vs. State of West Bengal reported in AIR (1997) SC 610. 7. With the above direction, this Petition is ordered. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (P&A) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Nagercoil, Kanyakumar District. 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, Madurai. +1 CC TO MR.M.SANKAR, ADVOCATE S.R. NO. 10118 Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2292 of 2011 23.02.2011 vsm PAM 08.03.2011/4C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/