.C.C.No.178of 2007 Petitioners \- jn-1 1A) Smt. Sarswati Kaushik, aged 36 years, Wd/of Late Suresh Kaushik. 1 B) Kumari Priyanka, aged about 17 years, D/o. Late Suresh Kaushik, through her mother Smt. Sarswati Kaushik. 1C) Pratlk Kaishik, aged about 14 years, S/o. Late SureshKaushik, thropugh^^-,^ his mother Smt. Sarsv/ati Kaushik. Ail R/o.. Rajendra Nagar, Bilaspur, Tahsli and Dlstrict Bflaspur, CG. 2) Rameshvi/ar Prasad Tiwari, S/o. Shri I.P. Tiwari, aged about 42 years, Clerk, DistricS Cooperative Union Ltd., Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur, CG. 3) Devendra Kumar Tiwari, S/o. B< Ram Tiwari, Aged about 31 years^ Peon, District Co-operative UniOn Ltd, Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur, CG. 4) Shivmani Qautam, S/o. Late B.L. Gautarri, aged about 27 years, Compositor, District Co-operative Union Ltd., (Press) Nehru Chowk, silaspur, CG. Versus 1) State of Chhattisgarh, tt^^ygh Jts Secretary, De'partment'"-<*&f C6- operative, Mantraiaya, D.K,S. ' Bhawan, Raipur, CG. 2) Registrar, Co-operative Societies Chhattisgarh.Raipur, CG. 3) Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bifaspur, CG. 4) District Co-Operative Union Ltd., Nehru Chowk, Biiaspur, through its Authorized Officer. :;il..': '^•i^ it-iT^ns^^s (AppSication for modification in the fina! orat order dated 23-04-2007) SB: Hon'ble Mr.JusticeSatish K. Agnihotri Present: Shri M.K. Bhaduri Advocate appears on behaif of Shri R.K. Kesharwani, counsel for the petitioners. Shri SatishGupta, Dy. Govt. Adyocate fortheState. & las. ~'Y 11 iil l,i:;F (Passed on 12th June, 200?) By this application, iearned counsei appearing for the petitsoners seeks deletipn of para 1 to the extent that "The petitioners/Asspciation have spught Tor a direction to grant empioyees of the petitioners Association, the benefit of 5 Pay Commission" ftorh the order dated 23rd Aprii, 2007 passed in Writ Petition No.1414 of 2005 (Suresh Kumar Kaushik and others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others) as this was notthe case ofthepetitioners. It appears that due to inadvertent mistake the said paragraph has crept in the order dated 23-4-2007 passed in W.P.No.1414/2005. 2) On perusal of the papers, it appears that the above stated paragraph has wrongiy been typeri inadvertently in first para of the order dated 23-4-2007 inW.P.No.1414/2005. 3) Accordingly, theappiication is ordered as prayed for. Para 1 to the extent that "The petitioners/Association have sought for a direction to grant employees of the petitioners Association, the benefrt of 5 Pay CommissiQn" is deleted frQm the order dated 23 Apri!, 2007 passed in Writ Petition No.1414 of 2005 (Suresh Kumar Kaushik and others Vs. .^" State of Chhattisgarh and others) and the amended or4^be issued accordingly. ; v '. 4) Acopyofthisorderbekept.inW.P.No.1414,'2005. 5) !n vie* ofthe above, M.C.C.No.178/2007 stands disp-osedof. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Raju