IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR(CG) WRIT PETITION (S) NO.^So'7 /2006 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 9>.....-^'^" ^^'^1' ^o. a®^ .3- ^"'^.^ Prem Sai Nayak,.aged about44 years,-^ son of Shri Gorelal Nayak, Assistant Teacher, Government Middle School Bangchee, Vikas Khand Baramkela, District Raigarh (CG) VERSUS 1, State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director, Lokshikshan Evam / Sanchalnalay, Raipur, (C.G.) 3. The District Education Officer,/ Education District Raigarh (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER_AKUCLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, XI-HC-78 sii^rwR-ii'b gwan^Tsfiro (S) 3^ •^ww^, ®^\ww,Riciwy ^^.^J,^>..^^7/^^ *TiH^irssw^ ^T 200 sn^Tira^ (isrfgg^r) ssnwHferan^T 11.12.2006 Shri A.N. Bhakta, leamed c] Shri Ajay Dw'vedi, leamed Heard. =t)l<<fCT<()-f *11*«'il"¥teA<Rltdl< ^3i1^T3TI^r ounsel for ttie petitioner. P.L. fbr the State/respondents. By this petition under Art|;tes 226/227 of the Constitution of fndia, the petiUoner seeks a dire| appointment in e light of the de Administrative Tribunai, Jabali 1452/1998 (Harish Chandra Sins others)dated 31.1.2000 2. Learned counsel appearinj fction to the respondenis to pay the incremente and seniority on th]e basis of the date of his initial [sision rendered by the leamed State ^ur in Original AppiicaUon No. h and others Vs. State of M.P. and ) for the petitioner ptaced on record copy of the order dated 9-11-3006 passed by this Court in Writ Petition (S) No. 5473/2006 (Ra|<esh Kumar Sharma Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others) and 4rd®rdated 6-4-2005 in W.P. No. 1890/2003 (Chhattisgarh Shikch^k Sangh -v State of ChhatUsgarh and others) and submits that he petttioner is similarly situated, therefore, the similar order may b^ passed. 3. The case of the petitioner i^ that he was appointed as Assistant Teacher in the School Education pepartment on probation for a period of two years with the fixed salary) However, later on, after compietion of two years' probation, the petiti4ner was regularized but, he was noi given the regular pay scaie fromj the date of his initial appointment. Other similarly situated teacher^ moved the State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur for regular pay scale, wherein learned Tribunal vide P.T.O. XI-HC-78 tTTRCfT SfiW^) 3:5^'^lli)l<-)'4, aiflwis, Ridwy _^. 'P. c$ .3 - ^ - <^07/06 VTaKV{-x—'••'•••••••••• ^IOQ 3<i^i w<«(y<!^st<^tr) 3n^r^rR-fi+ (P'IT5fTRWsb*11=t> SOTW^feTW^T order dated 31.1.2000 altowed the| representations to accord the sam{ sjtuafed, but, Bie respondents h^\ petition. 4. Leamed counsel for the may be ailowed to make a similar treatment to the petitioner s|i sanctioned to other similariy situat^ of the Stete Administrative Tribunali counsel for the respondents/State 5. Having heard iearned coun^ to the facte and circumstances the limited prayer made by leamecf to be reasonable. Therefore, the| representation within a period of t4 No.1, raising all his grievances decide the said representation in ^i of 30 days from the date of considering atl the points raised account the order dated 31.1.; Administrative Tribunai in Original 6. The writ petition is direction. No order as to coste. 7. Certified copy as per rutes. *l«Ic)<fl.<MWirtTfffa'<fl <RltAK ^srf^TSn^T same. The peUtioner made several treatment as he was also similariy not paid any heed. Thus, this h^ve p^titioner submlts that the petitioner repres^ntation to respondent No.1 to give s|nd same pay-scale which has been situat^d teachers on account of the order dated 31.1.2000, to which learned (las no objection. jei for ttie parties and having regard of U|ie case, in the opinton of this Court, counsel for the petitioner appeare petttioner is allowed to mato a )TO weeks from today to respondeni i, in tum, respondent No.1 shall jn objective manner within a period reijetpt of such representation, after ]by the peUtioner and taking into passed by the ieamed State 14pplication No. 1452/1998. accordirlgly disposed of with the aforesaid ahd, 20)00 Sdl- Dhirendra Mishra Judge <^ ^•^1' P.T.O.