IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 2972 of 2009 Between: M/s. K. Yellaiah & Sons Rep. by its Managing Partner, K. Sudershan, Special Class Contractors, A Partnership Firm. R/o. 5-6-573/5B, Bharat Gas Compound, Pragathi Nagar, Nizamabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Secretary Roads & Buildings Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 Engineer in Chief (R & B), Roads Erramanjil, Hyderabad. 3 Superintending Engineer (R & B) Circle Nizamabad. 4 M/s. Raghava Constructions Narayanapuram Village, Khammam Dist. 5 M/s. SSR Crest Engineers & Constructions Ltd. 39, 40, 41B, II Floor, Soni Business Complex, Prashanthi Nagar I.E., Kukatpally, Hyderabad. 6 The Commissioner Commissioner of Tenders 6th Floor, B.R.K.R. Bhavan, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, order or direction, preferably a Writ in the nature of Mandamu declaring the action of the Respondents 1 to 4 & 6 in awarding the contract, namely "Formation of byepass road to Nizamabad town in Nizamabad Dist.", pursuant to the Tender Notification vide IFB No.30284/EET/DEE6/AE3/2008 dated 22/11/2008 in favour of the 4th respondent as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and also being contrary to the G.O.Ms.No.94 (Irrigation and CAD (PW- COD) Dept. dated 01/07/2003 and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 and 6 not to award the contract, namely "Formation of byepass road to Nizamabad town in Nizamabad District", to the 4th respondent herein, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.VENUGOPAL Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR ROADS & BUILDINGS The Court made the following : ORDER: Sri P.Venugopal, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the court to withdraw the writ petition. Accordingly, permission is granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. N.V.RAMANA,J DT.27.2.2009 msv