IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 8745 of 2009. Date of Decision: 29th May, 2009. Dhanvir Singh Petitioner through Mr. Sudhir Mittal, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL) The petitioner seeks the following reliefs:- [i] a direction to the respondents to faithfully prosecute FIR No. 45 dated 9.3.2007, registered at Police Station, Phase VIII, Mohali; [ii] a direction to the respondents to trace out the documents necessary for prosecution of the aforementioned FIR which are stated to have been misplaced; and [iii] a direction to the respondents to cancel the FIR No. 300 dated 14.10.2004, registered at Police Station, Mohali. As regards the first relief, it is the conceded position that investigation in FIR No. 45 dated 9.3.2007 is already complete and a report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. has been presented. In this view of the matter, no further direction in respect thereto is required to be issued, except to observe that it is for the learned Judicial Magistrate shall proceed further, in accordance with law. So far as prayer No. [ii] is concerned, since challan has already been presented, necessary documents/evidence which have some bearing on the fate of the case arising out of FIR No. 45 dated 9.3.2007 would be summoned by the learned Judicial Magistrate as and when the occasion arises. The petitioner in his capacity as a complainant may approach the learned Magistrate in that regard at an appropriate stage, if so permissible in law. Similarly, no direction can be issued by this Court to the respondent – Police Authorities to cancel the FIR No. 300 dated 14.10.2004. Suffice it to observe that if any cancellation report has been presented by the police, the learned Judicial Magistrate shall take decision in respect thereto, in accordance with law. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. May 29, 2009. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE