THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.6189 OF 2005 ORAL ORDER: Petitioner is holding a licence under Tree for Tapper scheme to sell toddy at Borgoan village, Makloor Mandal, Nizamabad District. By proceedings dated 18.12.2005 issued by the 2nd respondent- Prohibition & Excise Superintendent, Nizamabad, licence of the petitioner was suspended, pending enquiry, on the allegation that he has been running toddy shop in an unauthorized premises. Basing on the said allegation, Crime No.617/05-06 under Section 34(a) of the A.P. Excise Act, 1968 has also been registered. That apart, vide notice dated 20.03.2006, petitioner was called upon to show cause as to why his licence shall not be cancelled. While the matter stood thus, the petitioner made a representation requesting to compound the offence alleged and the petitioner complains that the respondents failed to consider the same. Hence, the petitioner seeks a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents in not considering his representation dated 21.03.2006, as arbitrary and illegal, and consequently, to direct the respondents to consider his representation for withdrawal of orders of suspension of licence and finalize the case by compounding the same. Since the representation made by the petitioner dated 21.03.2006 is still pending, without expressing any opinion on merits, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Writ Petition is accordingly, disposed of. No costs. ______________ (G. ROHINI, J.) 28th March, 2006. Kgr THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.6189 OF 2005 28th March, 2006. Between: G. Rama Goud. .. Petitioner. And The Deputy Commissioner, Prohibition & Excise, Nizamabad and two others. .. Respondents.