1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Civil Application No. 1542 of 2010 In MCA (St) No. 19196 of 2010 In WP No. 366 of 2009 Kishor v. State of Maharashtra and anr -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr S.R. Narnaware, Adv for applicants Coram: B. P. Dharmadhikari & A. P. Bhangale, JJ Dated: 16th August 2011 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner. Prayer is to condone delay of 206 days caused in filing review application in Writ Petition No. 366 of 2009. MCA (St) No. 19196 of 2010 is for review of judgment dated 6.3.2009 in Writ Petition No. 366 of 2009. 2. The Division of this Court has disposed of Writ petition No. 366 of 2009 after noticing contention of the petitioner based upon the Constitution Bench decision of the Honourable Apex Court in case of State of Maharashtra v. Milind Katware reported in AIR 2001 SC 393. Petitioner had claimed protection in view of that judgment. The Division Bench has placed reliance on Full Bench decision of this Court in the case of Ganesh Rambhau Khalale v. State of Maharashtra & ors reported in 2009 (1) Bom. C.R. 689 i.e. Writ Petition No. 4524 2 of 2008, decided on 7.1.2009. The said judgment categorically holds that protection extended by Honourable Apex Court in Milind Katware’s case and subsequent judgment is under Article 142 of the Constitution of India. 3. In these circumstances, we do not see any reason to interfere in the order sought to be reviewed. Hence, after hearing learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent no.1-State, we do not find any merit in the prayer for condonation of delay also. Hence, Civil Application No. 1542 of 2010 as also Civil Application (St) No. 19196 of 2010 stand rejected. Judge Judge joshi