^i'-^.Tir/o^ INTHE M.P. STATE ADMINISTRATIVETR1BUNAL AT RAIPUR ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. (Q'L<i)-&f 1998 Applicant : RamkumarYadav Aged about 31 years Son of Shri Manglu Ram Yadac Resident of Village Jawahar Ward, Padaopara Post - Mungeli, Block &Tah.- Mungeli Distt. Bilaspur (M.P.) (Ex-Mansevi Sahayak Shikchhak, Previously appointed on due selection and eligibilities against the vacant post of Asstt. Teachers, under the Edn. Deptt. of Govt.ofM.P.) VERSUS NON-APPLICANTS/ RESPONDENTS (1) StateofM.P. Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Vallabh Bhawan, BhopaKM.P.) (2) Commissioner oi Public Instructions, Govt. of M.R, Education Deptt., Directorate of Public Instructions, (DPI Office), Near Chetak Bridge, Bhopal (M.P.) (3) Deputy Director of Public Instructions Govt. of M.R, Education Deptt. Education Distt. Bilaspur, P.0. Bilaspur (M.P.) (4) Block Education Officer Govt. of M.R, Education Deptt. P.0. Munaeli. Tah. Munaeli, Distt. Bilaspur (M.P.1 ABEl.^ation undersection 19oftheAdministrativeTribunalAct 1985 (No.13of 1985) read with Articles 14.16. 1LAJ311 of the Constitution of India. considered with Principles of Natural and Social Justice. PARTICULARS OF APPLICATION J^ ..:A ^ \ // ..< "•, ^' 1. Particulars of Applicant : As in CauseTitle. 2. Particulars of Non - Applicant : As in Cause Title. 3. "Particulars of the Orders aaainst whic the application isjnade The Applicant is not aggrieved by any particular orders but is aggrieved by the action of the Non-Applicants/Respondents, in not considering the demand of Justice in the case ofthe Applicant, by reinstatement/re-appointment and regularisation as Asstt. Teascher on the regular scale of pay and changing the Education Policies every now & then and violating the Mandatory Provisions of Articles 14, 16, 21 and 311 of the Constitution of India and also the Principles of Natural and Social Justice, Equity and Fair Play in Administration and abusing their powers in the matter of public employment. 4. Jurisdiction ofThe Hon'bleTribunal: L ....2 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B, : HON^LEMR SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. WMT PETITION (S.) N0.2535 OF 2005 Petitioner Ramkumar Yadav versus Respondents State ofM.P. and others Present ; Mr. Alok Nigam, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State. ORDER »tE (Passed on 7m ofSeptember, 2006) It is submitted that the facts and question of law involved in the present petition are same to that of in Ram Sahay Jha vs. State ofMadlrya Pradesh and others (Originat Application No. 15/1995). The Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur, by its judgment and order dated 16-2-1996, allowed the application of the petitioner therein. Leamed eounsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to approach Ae respondents/State for consideration and disposal of the petitioner's case in terms ofthe order dated 16-2-1996 passed in the case of Ram Sahay Jha (Supra) by Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents/State fairly agrees with the submissions made by leamed counsel for the petitioner. 3. Accordingly, the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation before the respondents - State Authorities for their decision on the representation in the light ofthe order dated 16-2- 1996 passed in the case ofRam Sahay Jha (Supra), in accordance with law, on its own merit, within reasonable time. With the above-stated liberty, this petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Certified copy as per rules. ^^ A<v ^^6