IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13638 of 2010 KAMLESH MAHTO & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 13.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 147, 149, 302, 201 of the I.P.C. The matter relates to the love affairs between the nephew of the petitioner No. 4 and the daughter of the complainant. Initially Karpi P.S. Case No. 9 of 2007 was registered against the complainant’s family on behalf of the petitioners for the murder of their nephew namely Mukesh and in that case the charge sheet has been submitted and the trial is in advance stage. The present case gets its origin from Karpi P.S. Case No. 10 of 2007 lodged by the mother of the victim girl Sabina who was also subsequently found to be dead. The police after investigation submitted final form and then on protest cum complaint enquiry was held and the complaint case was also dismissed. Subsequently the order of complaint case was challenged before the Sessions Judge who directed for further enquiry and then the present cognizance order has been passed on 2 25.02.2010. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that it is the complainant side who killed both the girl and boy because complainant did not like the boy having relations with the girl of complainant side. Learned counsel for the informant has submitted that after finding prima facie case, the cognizance has been taken and there are materials in the case diary about the involvement of the petitioners in the occurrence. Learned counsel for the petitioners however, submits that after thorough investigation the final form was submitted and subsequently the protest petition was dismissed after conducting proper enquiry and the present case is just retaliatory measure. In view of the fact that the police after investigation submitted final form, protest petition after enquiry was dismissed and case lodged by petitioners is earlier point of time, let the petitioners namely 1. Kamlesh Mahto 2. Dinesh Mahto 3. Ramesh Mahto 4. Amrendra Sao, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Jehanabad in connection 3 with Complaint Case No. 956 of 2007, Trial No. 2697 of 2010. Shageer (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)