IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI WRIT PETITION NO : 14686 of 1995 Between: Yagati Prakasa Rao s/o Appayya, r/o Balakavi Valasa Village, Regidi Amudalavalasa (M), Srikakulam Dist. A.P. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palakonda Revenue Division, Srikakulam Dist, A.P. 2 Panku Adilaxmi W/o Late Tavitaiah, Village Talayari, Balakavi Valasa (V), Regidi Amudalavalasa (M), Srikakulam Dist, A.P. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the 1st respondent herein in appointing the 2nd respondent as village servant of Balakavi Valasa (V), Regidi Amudalavalasa (M), Srikakulam Dist through his peoceedings in RC.no. 2004/94/E dated 24.1.95 as illegal arbitrary and against to the principles of natural justice and contrary to the A.P. Village office servants Rules 1969 and set aside the same. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.V.DHANAMJAYA RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: When the matter came up for hearing on 04-11-2004, none appeared, nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. Hence the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, when the matter is called, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. 25-11-2004 rkk To 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palakonda Revenue Divisional, Srikakulam Dist, A.P. 2 Panku Adilaxmi W/o Late Tavitaiah, Village Talayari, Balakavi Valasa (V), Regidi Amudalavalasa (M), Srikakulam Dist, A.P. 3 Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 4 Two CD copies.