AB 2316/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.R. SARMA Heard Mr. B.D. Goswami, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioners. Also hea rd Mr. B.S. Sinha, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, appearing for the State-resp ondent. By this application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the petitioners, namely (1) Sri Upen Kalita and (2) Sri Tapan Kalita, have prayed for pre-arrest bail, in c onnection with Kamalpur P.S. Case No.251/2011, under Sections 341/376/325/34 IPC . Perused the Case Diary, more particularly, the statement of the victim woman, re corded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. The learned counsel, appearing for the petitioners, has submitted that the petit ioners are no way involved with the alleged offence. The petitioners are on pre-arrest bail w.e.f. 12.08.2011. There is no adverse re port against them. Having heard the learned counsel for both the parties and considering the materi als collected by the Investigating Officer, I find no sufficient reason, requiri ng custodial interrogation of the petitioners. Therefore, release of the petitio ners will not adversely affect the investigation. Accordingly, the interim order, dated 12.08.2011 made in favour of the petitione rs aforesaid, is made absolute, subject to the condition that the petitioners sh all appear before the Investigating Officer as and when so required and shall no t interfere with the investigation in any manner. Return the Case Diary. The A.B. Application is disposed of.