IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH DECEMBER 2010 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 32848 of 2008(I) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- JOHNSON, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O.KURIAPPAN, THAZHEKKADAN HOUSE, KALLUR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT BY ADVS. SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR SMT.P.A.ANITHA RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THRIKKUR GRAMAPANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, KALLUR P.O., THRISSUR. 2. SECRETARY, THRIKKUR GRAMAPANCHAYAT, KALLUR P.O., THRISSUR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.32848/2008 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT OF THE PETITIONER'S LAND DTD. 13.10.08. P1(a):- COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT OF THE PETITIONER'S LAND DTD. 14.10.08. P2:- COPY OF THE APPLICATION WITH THE ENDORSEMENT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE PANCHAYAT DT.D 13.10.08. TRUE COPY P.S. TO JUDGE tss T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 32848 of 2008-I - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 15th day of December, 2010. JUDGMENT The petitioner claims to be the owner of a total extent of 12.5 cents of land in Sy. No.370/4 of Kallur Villag in Thrissur District. It is averred in the writ petition that the property is lying without any fence and petitioner intended to construct a compound wall on the eastern boundary of the property. The eastern boundary of the property is having a length of 20 metres. It appears that the petitioner has filed an application for permission for constructing the compound wall on 13.10.2008. Ext.P2 produced along with the writ petition is the copy of the application with the endorsement of the Secretary. It is averred in the writ petition that along with the application, the petitioner had produced a sketch also. 2. Since the petitioner did not receive any reply in the matter, this writ petition has been filed. Even though notice was ordered, it has not returned after service, so far. 3. Since the prayer is only for a direction to dispose of Ext.P2, there will be a direction to the second respondent to consider the application submitted by the petitioner dated 13.10.2008, within a period of two months wpc 32848/2008 2 from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, in terms of the rules. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the second respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/