: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1637 OF 2006 Ms.Shilpa Mangalpandy Anand .. ..Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. ..Respondents Mr.Nitin Pradhan with Ms. Shubhada Khot for petitioner Mr.D.S.Mhaispurkar, APP for State CORAM : J.N.PATEL & SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. DATE : 5TH SEPTEMBER, 2006. P.C.: 1. Heard. 2. The learned APP after seeking instructions from PSI Kalpe, from Khar Police Station states that the Police has made the necessary enquiry into the matter and have come to the conclusion that the offences had been committed at Bangalore and therefore, they would transfer the case to Bangalore after registering the FIR for the purpose of further investigation through the office of the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai. 3. Mr.Nitin Pradhan the learned counsel appearing : 2 : for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would follow up the case at Bangalore. The petitioner will also inform when the case has been transferred by the Mumbai Police to their counter part in Bangalore and to which Police Station. As such nothing survives in the petition, the petition stands disposed of accordingly. (J.N.Patel, J.) (Smt. Roshan S.Dalvi,J.)