IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15391 of 2009 SITA RAM SAO, son of Bindeshwar Sao, resident of Village Baidrabad, P.S. Arwal, District Arwal. -----Petitioner Versus 1.STATE OF BIHAR. 2.DHIRAJ KUMAR GUPTA son of Sri Guru Prasad, resident of Village Mau, P.S. Tekari, District Gaya. ----Opposite Parties ----------- 2. 20.5.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. This application is for cancellation of bail granted to opposite party no.2 Dhiraj Kumar Gupta. It is submitted that opposite party no.2 obtained the bail vide order dated 2.2.2009 passed in Cr.Misc. No.48911 of 2008 by not placing the true facts. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the present petitioner was opposite party no.2 in the earlier Cr.Misc. No.48911 of 2008 and the order for grant of bail was passed in his presence. As such, the submission that opposite party no.2 herein obtained the order of bail by suppressing the true material facts is of no consideration. Considering the submission of the parties and on perusal of the order dated 2 2.2.2009 passed in Cr.Misc. No.48911 of 2008, I do not find any ground for cancelling the bail granted to opposite party no.2 as per the aforesaid order dated 2.2.2009. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)