IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH M.C.C.N0. «10 OF 2004 \_ APPLICATION FOR RESTBIIATION OF/WRIT PETITION NO. 2328 OF 2004 APPLICANT ( ‘ ' 0*9’5 Virendra Kumar Shukla, S/O Late . ' " « /Sllri Ramavatar Shukla, Aged about 52 years, R/O Nehru Nagar Ward, Raipur, Tashil & District Raipur (Chhattisgarh). v Versus gaN-APPLICANT ,Rajendra Shanker Shukla, S/O 6/ Late Shri Ramavatar Shukla, Aged about 66 years, ' R/O Malviya Road, Raipur, Tashil & District Raipur (Chhattisgarh), XI—HC—22 2—5-2005 On a mention being made, 1he maTTer is Taken up for hearing. Heai‘d Mr. B.D. Guru, counse! for fhe applicant If has been mem‘ioned in the M.C.C. Tha‘r The pefh‘ioner's counsel /\ could noT appear as he was on his legs Wfher Court ‘rherefore, he could no? appear before 'fhe Cour-1‘ of The Time when fhe ma‘H’er was col!ed for hearing‘ Having heard ieamed counsel for fhe applicani' and having gone ix fhr'ough ihe M.C.C.,‘ I am of fhe :pinion Thal- if is a fi‘f case in which The i ~ M.C.C. should be allowed and The case should be resTor‘ed To iTs' original number. Accordingly, The MLC. is allowed and The wriT peTiTion is resTored To iTs original number. AfTer resToraTion, The maTTer be lisTeci before The appropriaTe Bench as per The rosTer. En view of This orderK, E.A.No.2891/2004 sTands disposed of. Sdl— “ ’\ L.C.BIL§1£)00 Soma bug;