IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50813 of 2008 MD.KUDUSH @ MD.KUDUS, sona of late Ibrahim resident of village – Laudh, P.s. and District - Supaul Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 21.1.2009 Heard. The allegation against the petitioner is of taking away the son of the informant to Delhi on a promise of giving monthly salary of Rs.1500 which was paid in one lump sum of Rs.5000 once and thereafter, not giving any clue about the boy. The lady complainant suspected that petitioner has caused her son to disappear. It appears that the boy appeared and made statement under section 164 of the Cr.P.C. and that statement reveals that the relationship was cordial between the parties and after some time, there was some quarrel and as per the statement of the boy, the petitioner and others confined him inside a house. The statement indicates that there was some compromise between the parties which the boy negated by making his statement in paragraph 8 thereof. After having taken an over all view of the statement, it appears merely a case of wrongful confinement and 2 considering that, petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. III, Supaul in S.T. No. 169 of 2008 arising out of Supaul P.S. Case no. 191 of 2006. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )