[1] S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.39/2007 Bapu Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order : 05.01.2007 HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK Mr. P.S. Chundawat for petitioner. Mr. Vishnu Kachhawaha, Public Prosecutor. I have heard learned counsel and the learned Public Prosecutor and also carefully perused the statements recorded during the course of trial. It is a case under Sec.498A and 306 IPC and the allegations against the petitioner are that he used to beat his wife. From the statements of the witnesses, it appears that the accused made demand for dowry. It also prima facie appears that the deceased died an unnatural death. Therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I do not feel inclined to grant bail. Accordingly, the bail application is rejected. However, the petitioner shall be free to move regular bail application after recording of material witnesses in the case. The trial Court to expedite the trial. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK)J. /jpa