THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NOS.5840 AND 5760 OF 2009 DATED:03-12- 2010. Between N.Ramakrishna Reddy … Petitioner-defendant And G.Venkat Reddy …Respondent-Plaintiff THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NOS.5840 AND 5760 OF 2009 COMMON ORDER: These revisions are directed against the orders, dated 06-11-2009, in I.A.Nos.4486 and 4453 of 2009 in O.S.No.227 of 2006 on the file of the Principal District Judge, R.R. District at L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad, whereunder and whereby the applications filed to recall P.W.1 to give evidence to the extent of marking the document and to receive the certified copy of the bank statement of account, were allowed. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that the documents sought to be now marked have already been filed into Court and therefore question of again receiving the documents does not arise and hence, he prays to set aside the impugned orders. 3. No doubt, the learned counsel for the petitioner is right in contending that if the same documents are filed, it cannot be received as evidence. The affidavit filed in support of the application by the respondent herein would go to show that the earlier document filed is not authenticated copy issued by the bank. Therefore, the present application is filed to receive the certified copy of the bank statement. Therefore, there is no illegality committed by the trial Court in receiving the document and hence, there are no grounds to interfere with the impugned orders. 4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed. However, it is made clear that receipt of the document is subject to admissibility, relevancy and proof, No order as to costs. -------------------- K.C.BHANU, J DATED:03-12- 2010 Hsd