IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 3093 of 1987 (O&M) Municipal Committee, Abohar ...Petitioner vs The Additional Deputy Commissioner and another ..Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: None for the petitioner. Rajesh Bindal, J. This writ petition was filed by Shri Surinder Mohan Lal Arora, Advocate. On 11.1.2006, learned counsel for the respondents pointed out that Mr. Arora had expired. Actual date notice was directed to be issued to the petitioner for 1.3.2006. As per office report, notice issued to the petitioner was received back duly served. The service was completed for 1.3.2006. Today when the case was taken up for hearing, no one was present for the petitioner. Challenge in the present petition is to the order, Annexure P-5, passed by the Additional Deputy Commissioner in appeal filed by respondent no. 2, wherein it has been held that the petitioner shall not be entitled to charge house tax and water tax for the year 1982-83 at revised rates. For the purpose reliance was placed upon Section 66 (1) of the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911. However, as counsel for the petitioner is not available, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. 5.4.2011 (Rajesh Bindal) vs Judge