1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 5879/2010. Raju N. Singam and others. -: VERSUS :- M.S.E.B. Koradi and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : DECEMBER 09, 2010. Heard Shri M.R. Pillai, learned counsel for petitioners. Relationship of petitioner with respondent no.1 is neither in dispute nor indisputable. It is therefore, obvious that petitioner has to take recourse to conciliation machinery under Industrial Disputes act to get the dispute resolved. Shri Pillai, learned Counsel has attempted to show to this Court that though the contractors have changed the petitioners have continued in service for long time and have done the work of respondent no.1. As respondent no.1 gave contract to respondent no.3 and 2 respondent no.3 employed respondent no.4 as sub- contractor, petitioners were working under respondent no.4 sub-contractor. In view of this, I do not find any jurisdictional error. With liberty to take further appropriate measures in accordance with the law, petition is disposed of. No costs. JUDGE Rgd.