5 ^, IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTCS^ARH AT BILASPUR (C.&.) W.P. (S) N0. ^3^<^ /2011 PETmONER RESPONDENTS : .^^ ^^ €^-^ 'y' 1. 2: 3.' < ^ 5. 6. Gangadas Sahu, Aged about 52 years, S/o Shri Shambhuram Sahu, Lecturer, Government Higher Secondary School Mohala, Block Mohla, District-Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Tribal welfare Department b.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department Raipur (C.&.) Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department Rajnandgaon (C.6.) Block Education Officer Mohla, District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Joint Director, Treasury, Account Pension, Raipur (C.G.) The Principle Government Higher Secondary School, Mohla, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ^ v^y^\ 2 WRIT PETETION UNbER ARTCCLE 226 OF THE CONSTCTUION OF INDIA HEGH COURT OP CHHATTISQAEm AT BELASPUR SB : HON'BLB MR. JUSTICB PmTINKER DIWAKE'R PETITIGNER RESPONDENTs W.P.JSI.HO. -7369/2011 Gangadas Saliu. versus State .of Chiiattisgarh & O'thers Shri K.S.Pawai.\ coiinsel for tlie petiti.on.er. ShriYashwant Siiigh Thakm'; Dy. A.G. for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORDBR (07.12.2011) Grievaace of tlie petitiouer in the present petition is that tlie petitioner was appoiiited as Assistant Teacher on a fixed pay scale of Rs. 100-150 aad after completion of probation, he was graiited regular pay scale ofRs. 169-300. Contention of the counsel tbr the petitioner is that he is entitled for regular pay scale with effect froni the date of io.itial appointment and his case is squarely covered with nimiber of decisions passed by tliis Court and also the judgment rendered by the M,P. State Admrrij-sti'ative Tribunal, Jabalpiir in 0»A* N©.2745/39 ^SS'aj&hukafit Yes&u & 56 Ot-hers ¥s.State afM»P»& Ot/iers^ where iii it has 'beeB. held that similarly placed teachers are entiUed for regular pay scale from the d ate of their uiitial appointment. It is uot disputed by bofh the parties tliat the matter was taken up by the State to fhe Apex Court but the appeal was also dismissed by the Apex Court upholding the decision ofthe Tribunal to the etYect that tiie Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entifled for regzilar pay scale from. the date of their iaitial appointinent. In view of the above submission ttiade by the counsel for fhe parties; the petition is disposed of iii tlie saiiie teiTris i.e. the petitioner is grajited Uberty to malse a representauoii, if so advised, in aSpnf | j^eMiaJ^luW-ld i -/PS l *MC[ ip^ ^oiiepjoDoe xn A^op^s uoi^^uosojd^j oip opp^p o^ ^isqTi ^B sq 'ppioM psrLi^ouoo ^uoipire ^rp piie QSBO sip. jo S^UQIQ: oip uo IXOlOldo AUB p9SS3jdX3 ^OU S8TI ^JUOQ siq^ ^^iy J'eQp QpBui SI ^J •sio^j ^q^jo Aur^njos onp j^ye jspjo ^qe^nis ss^d o^ s^uoipnB ^a^g sq^ mojj pQ^oodxs si ^j 'A^Suipjoooe J3H9J siires o^ p9[^uo oq ABOI jsuori^sd si^ •'S6"IO"SO P^^P JspJO Aq £6/2689 "ON (iTAio) uo^psd 3A?Qq yepQdg ui ^JIIOQ ^mojdng oq^ Aq p^ujjguoo ^u^nbosqns pire (^jdns) upB^ ^ire^nqp^p^ iq {eunquj^ SApBj^sroimpv ^l^S QIR Aq possed j^pjo jod s^ Supooj snres oip uo spire^s jsuoiiT^od Org JI •3AT^33dsjQd S^I Ul pue S^UQIK UMO SIT uo ^s^o jioq.t j^pisuoo O^ pQ-$.03Jlp Sl ^.UQpUOdsSJ pQIUQOUOO QIp. 'IUYU IH pIIB (g/d QJUXQUUV) 80'ST'ZS p^Bp jBjiiano 31^ pue ^UQUigpnf piQsojoje Qip. jo ^q§T^ sip.