IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 25TH MARCH 2011 / 4TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 4642 of 2011(E) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- JIJI JOHN,FINAL YEAR B.PHARM STUDENT, REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE & RESEARCH, THALAPPADY,PUTHUPPALLY,KOTTAYAM-9. BY ADV. SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY,REP.BY ITS REGISTRAR,PRIYADARSINI HILLS,ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT,PIN-686560. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS,MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY,PRIYADARSINI HILLS,ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT,PIN-686560. 3. THE VICE CHANCELLOR,MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY,PRIYADARSINI HILLS,ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT,PIN-686560. 4. THE PRINCIPAL,REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE & RESEARCH (SCHOOL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES),PUTHUPPALLY,KOTTAYAM-9. ADV. SRI. T.A. SHAJI, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY FOR R1 -3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 4642 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 25th day of March, 2011 J U D G M E N T Ext.P6 memo issued by the 2nd respondent is under challenge. Petitioner is a B.Pharm student under the 4th respondent, which is affiliated to the 1st respondent University. By Ext.P6 memo, the 3rd year examination results of the petitioner has been cancelled. It is this memo which is under challenge. 2. In the statement filed by the University, the reason stated is that, in terms of Ext.P2 governing B.Pharm Course, only those students who have passed the previous examination are eligible for appearing in the succeeding examinations. It is stated that the petitioner did not pass the first year examination and therefore was ineligible to appear for the 3rd year examination. However, the petitioner appeared for the said examination on the strength of Ext.P1 interim order passed by this Court in WP(C) No.415/10. It is also pointed out that when WP(C) No.415/10 was disposed of by Ext.P3 judgment, this Court refused to direct the University to declare the results of the 3rd year examination of the petitioner for the aforesaid reason. On this basis, University WPC No. 4642/11 :2 : contends that the petitioner is not entitled to the prayer sought for. 3. Admittedly, as per the regulations of the University, petitioner was ineligible to appear for the 3rd year examination for the reason that the petitioner had not successfully passed the first year examination. Apart from that reason, prayer sought for also has to be rejected for the reason that this very prayer has been declined by this Court in WP(C) No.415/10, in which the petitioner was the 10th petitioner. For the aforesaid reasons, there is nothing illegal with Ext.P6 memo issued by the University. Writ petition is only to be dismissed and I do so. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp