/ r M / C({ ‘®$ingie Benéh‘ (g IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P. Né. 443% at 2004 PETITIONERs /; Awadhesh Prafap Singh, € S/o. Lalan Pratap Singh, aged about 37 §Iears, Occupation — Podi Agriculture, R/ o. Village Govindpur, Tahsil — Surajpur, District ~ Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 15 Branch Manager Central Bank of India Branch Mahgaon, Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.) 2) Regional Manager Regiional Office v”; Central Bank of India, Mahamaya Road Ambikapur Branch Manager Central bank of India Rarnanujnagar, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surguja (Chhattisarh) Collector Surguja, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) N WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 8a 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The Petitioner most respectfully states as under: — 1) Particulars of the Petitioner:- Particulars of the petitioner are same as above in the I » cause title. v g §§GH @QIJR'T G? £§‘§E’i§?7i§$£§§§'€ £5? $§i&$?§§ ?_(c M“ WQE‘F PETiTiQN Nil 4§f§a§ G? EQEé 9%?iimmr Awadhesh P atag Singn Versus és Bwnch Magwager, Centrai Bamk of mdi‘a & Oi§wgrs WRET PETIT;SN UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 22? OF H'E COVST'TUTION GF §ND5A $§E hcn’bm W Qaimiz K Ammhmra §% Ms %-aamlda Sidaaau: Advecaze farms oezimner Resmndw SR§£R§€$Q£§i§ (Pass d (.8 day o; Octabe: 2010‘ ?. Learned munsei appearmg for the peiiiioner su§ami§g $hai the di$pute beiwseen the pai’iies have aheady bew resaiveai. Thus, the geti%ion has; bacome infmciuaus. 2. in View (3f the above, "ihe writ pet§%ian is di$missed, as having becomeinfruc’tuaus. a Sd/_ m Satish K. Agnihotn' Judge