1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CONTEMPT PETITION NO.62/2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3974/2007 (Ku. Kalpana Tryambakrao Mehare and others .v. Shri Sukhadeo K. Thorat and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri V.A. Kothale, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri S.K. Mishra, Advocate for the respondent No.1. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. 12TH FEBRUARY, 2008. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties. The petitioners by way of present petition, contend that the proposal for grant of exemption to the petitioners was not considered by the UGC within a period of four weeks from the date of the order passed by this Court on 18th April, 2002. Shri S.K. Mishra, the learned Assistant Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the respondent No.1 submits that the delay caused in not deciding the proposal of the petitioners within the stipulated time was on account that the proposal of the petitioners was not in proper form with requisite information. He submits that after the receipt of proposal by the UGC, the same was placed before the Exemption Committee 2 in its meeting held on 5th January, 2007 and accordingly approval for exemption was conveyed vide UGC communication dated 27th April, 2007, communicating that the exemption was granted subject to the condition that NET examination should be cleared in the relevant subject within two years from the date of communication of the exemption. In that view of the matter, nothing survives in the contempt petition and the same is disposed of as such. JUDGE *rrg.