IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.21223 of 2010 Date of Decision : September 16, 2011. Prince Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Anurag Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is working as a Guest Faculty Lecturer in the respondent-Institute. He seeks a direction that he be not relieved from the present assignment so as to adjust another Guest Faculty (Lecturer) in his place. Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, states that as a matter of policy and subject to the petitioner's eligibility and availability of work, the Guest Faculty (Lecturers) like the petitioner are not to be substituted by another set of Guest Faculty (Lecturers) and he shall be replaced by regularly appointed employee only. C.W.P.No .21223 of 2010 2 In this view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous. Dasti. September 16, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE