1 ^Q^ .?^UUA IDICAIUKt uHHAi Ti S'lnol©Bsffich • c Hon bte Shrl ?3Si;^5bi3- &fltf'*»-i; SJiy?a & ' c £ ^=^'^£ i^S'^f' '^fii3 3 3 fl versus wat Pras Petition No.2181 OF IViadnoprasad, S/o •Sahu, aged 20 years, Om Pr'akash. S/o Bhaawat Pras Sahu.aged 18 years, Sanjay Kumar, S/o >ahu, aged 12 (minor) Ajay Kumar, 8 years, petitioner No. 3 & 4 are minor through father Bhaawat Prasad Sahu. A!l the petitioners are R/o Viilage Sijaur, Post Urtum, Tahsi! & District Siiaspur(C.G.) Dwarikadhish, S/o Shivnathi, Aged 28 years, R/o Village - Bijaur, Post Urtum, Tahsi! & District iilaspur (C.G. State of Chhattisgarh throush ColSector, Bllaspur (C.G.) Mr. Rajeev Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Sanjay S. Agrawal, learned G.A. for the State. ||E2Uta:i$fKS!liy st assedon 21" Februarv, 2006! |n tni5 writ pstltion f;!^sd und:3r Artlcls 22T of the Constitutton. ths '•••der n? trte triai .Judge has been assailed. The petitioner ia the plaintiff. In the suit fiied by him for declaration and perpetual injunction, on an appiication rnade by him, the trial Judge granted temporary injunction. When that order was assaiied before the learned appeiiate Judge, he has reversed the by the order impugned in this writ on the -z' ground that the wili on the basis of which the petitioner has put-forth his ciaim, is iiiegal. Although, this writ petition vvas filed as far as back as on 08.10.2002, tH! date, the order made by the tearned appellate Judge has been in operation. Thesuitisoftheyear2002. In that view of the matter, 1 think that the ends of justice woutd be met by directing the learned frial Judge to dispose of the main suit itself wlthln a time-frame and till then directing the parties to maintain status-quo that obta'ns as on today. Accordingly, 1 direct the learned triai Judge to t,ry and dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possibte, at any rate, v»'ithin a period of six months, from the dats of receipt of a copv of this order. Lsarned trial Judge is further directed that the suit should be decided on the basis of the 'vidence that may be adduced by the parties and he shall not be in any way influenced by any of the obser/ations made by the leamed appellate Judge in the order impugned in thls writ petition, !t is further directed that the parties shatl maintain status-quo that obtains as on today with regard to the suit schedule property. The writ petition is disposed of In the above terms. Nocosts. __--—- •Ws Sd/- Chief Justice -rt ^"'