[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.673 OF 2007 Dilip Maruti Patharkar ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... Mr.R.S.Kate Advocate for Applicant Mr.S.S.Pednekar A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : MARCH 20, 2007 DATE : MARCH 20, 2007 DATE : MARCH 20, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.127 of 2006 of Baramati City Police Station. The said case is under Sections 302 of IPC. 3. The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the co-accused Mangal has been granted bail on merits and the role of the present applicant and that of Mangal is the same. Hence, he has prayed that applicant may be granted bail on the ground of parity. The learned A.P.P. has not [-2-] disputed that Mangal was granted bail on merits and the role of Mangal and the present applicant is the same. In this view of the matter, I am inclined to granted bail to the applicant. 4. The applicant to be released on her executing P.R.Bond and S.B.Bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rs.Twenty five thousand only) with one surety in the like amount on following conditions:- i) He is directed to attend Baramati City Police Station every day between 9.00 a.m. to 11.00 a.m. until further orders; ii) He is directed not to tamper with prosecution witnesses; iii) He is directed not to leave jurisdiction of Baramati City Police Station without prior permission. 5. Application is disposed of. [-3-] [ V.K.Tahilramani, J.]