1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 251 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3 OF 2008 The State of Maharashtra. ... ... Applicant. Versus Jankhama Pravin Joshi. ... Respondent. Mrs. A. S. Pai, APP for the Applicant. Mr. V. N. Tripathi for the Respondent. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : 3RD FEBRUARY, 2009. P. C.: This application has been filed seeking review of the judgment of this Court dated 6th May, 2008 in Writ Petition No. 3 of 2008. 2. It apears that the Division Bench had earlier decided one writ petition being Writ Petition No. 211 of 2007 in which the order of detention had been upheld. Thereafter, we decided the present writ petition in which the order of detention has been quashed. Earlier we were given an impression that both the writ petitions were filed on behalf of the same detenu but on going through different file we find that the present writ petition was filed by one Jankhama Pravin Joshi on behalf of her husband, namely, Pravin Pranshankar Joshi and the earlier writ petition had been filed by one Rahila Saeed Malik on behalf of 2 her husband, namely, Saeed Zakir Hussain Malik @ Afroz Malik. Now the learned Public Prosecutor submits that since they were co-accused and the facts were same, therefore the present judgment needs to be reviewed as the earlier judgment was not brought to the notice of the Court. 3. The detenu was arrested on 11th October, 2007. Even otherwise the period of detention is over as the period of detention was for one year. 4. Hence, we do not find any ground to entertain this review. The Review Application is, accordingly, rejected. Sd/- (BILAL NAZKI, J.) Sd/- (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)