Mgn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10452 OF 2009 Shetkari Sahakari Sangh Ltd. ..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.Respondents Mr. A.A. Kumbhakoni with Mr. H.S. Venegavkar, for the Petitioner Mr. S.N. Patil, AGP for Respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : 14TH DECEMBER, 2009 P.C. The property belonging to the petitioner was auctioned to satisfy the dues of respondent No.2. The bidder, according to the petitioners, has paid Rs.18.00 crores to respondent No.2 which has been appropriated by the respondent No.2 and No Due Certificate has since been issued by respondent No.2 to the petitioners. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that thereafter the respondent No.2 has taken no steps to complete the transaction. Once of the contentions raised is that no No Objection is required from the State Government under the U.LC. Act as the U.L.C. Act in the State of Maharashtra has since been repealed. The petitioners have made a representation dated 16th November, 2009 to the Chief Secretary, Government of Maharashtra to grant N.O.C. At the hearing the learned Counsel also points out that since N.O.C., is not required that decision may also be taken. Considering the controversy and as the decision will have to be taken by the Secretary, Urban Development Department we dispose of the petition by issuing the following order:- (i) The petitioners to move a fresh representation to the Secretary, Urban Development Department within 15 days from today. The Secretary, Urban Development Department, to dispose of the same within six weeks thereafter. Till such time the decision is taken by the Secretary, Urban Development Department the balance amount lying with the respondent No.2 to remain deposited with the Respondent No.2. With the above observations petition disposed off. (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)