1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Application No.1174 of 2010 [Ritesh @ Vikky Raju Rane through Central Prison, Nagpur .vs. State) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr.V.A.Thakre, APP for respondent/State. CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 4th August, 2010. Applicant was granted bail with a condition to furnish personal bond and surety bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/-. Applicant being unable to furnish it, continues to be in jail. He has submitted this letter praying that the accused similarly placed in Criminal Application No. 254 of 2010 is granted bail on the condition of furnishing personal bond of Rs.15,000/-. He claims parity and prays for modification. The Court had called for record of Criminal Application No. 254 of 2010. The applicant s claim is based on facts as seen on record. 2 This Court had directed learned A.P.P. to examine papers and submit if there can be any objection. Learned A.P.P. fairly states that no grounds are seen as to why similar benefits should not be extended to the applicant. In view of this, this Court directs that the the applicant be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond and solvent surety in a sum of Rs.15,000/-. Judge jais