IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10258 of 2008 NAGINA RAI, son of Late Bishundhari Rai, Resident of village-and Post Basauli, P.S. Kurhani, Distt- Muzaffarpur……….Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Joint Director, Consolidation, Muzaffarpur 3. The Deputy Director, Consolidation, Muzaffarpur 4. The Consolidation Officer, Kurhani, P.S. Kurhani, District-Muzaffarpur 5. Jai Mangal Rai 6. Jang Bahadur Rai Both sons of late Jaddu Rai, Resident of village-and P.O.-Basauli, P.S. Kurhani, Distt- Muzaffarpur ………………………………. ……… Respondents. ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey For the state: Mr. Ramchandra Pd. Bharti Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari Asstt. Counsel to SC-14 2. 30.04.2009 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the state. Petitioner has filed this application for quashing the orders passed by the Joint Director , Consolidation, the order dated 05.01.2006 passed by the Deputy Director, Consolidation, Muzaffarpur in case No. 60/99 and the order passed by Consolidation officer in Consolidation Case No. 1138 of 1990/158 of 1990. Petitioner has lost his case before all three forums. His prayer was for correction in the Khatiyan with respect to plot No. 1568, Khata No. 150 measuring 1 Katha and 44 decimals which has wrongly been recorded in the name of private respondents. Considering the fact that before the first court, the appellate court and the revisional court, the petitioner has lost his claim and the dispute relates to right, title and possession of - 2 - the parties over the disputed land. It is appropriate that the petitioner get his claim decided by civil court of competent jurisdiction as the parties will have an opportunity to lead evidence before the trial court. For deciding such questions, only civil courts are the appropriate forum. This writ application is, accordingly, dismissed. akv (Mridula Mishra, J.)