{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5893 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.389 OF 2009 Premkishore Ramlal Gindodiya APPLICANT VERSUS The Union of India and others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.A.S.Bajaj, Advocate for applicant Mr.K.B.Chaudhari, AGP for respondents. Mr.C.R.Deshpande, Advocate for Respondents No.10 and 17 Mr.S.B.Talekar, Advocate for respondent No.14 Mr.S.S.Kazi for respondents No.8 to 10, 14, 15 and 17 Mr.S.E.Sidique for Respondents No.11, 12, 13 and 16 ....... [CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, and A.V.POTDAR, J.J.] DATE : 30th July 2009 PER COURT: 1. This is an application by which the applicant seeks to intervene in the petition. We have heard Mr.Bajaj, learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for respondents. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and the applicant is permitted to intervene in the petition. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] [P.V.HARDAS, J.] drp/ca5893-09 {2} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7477 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.389 OF 2009 Madhukar Kanu Rathod APPLICANT VERSUS Iliyas mamu Mohd Yusuf Lakhara & others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.P.R.Patil, Advocate for applicant Mr.K.B.Chaudhari, AGP for respondents. Mr.C.R.Deshpande, Advocate for Respondents No.10 and 17 Mr.S.B.Talekar, Advocate for respondent No.14 Mr.S.S.Kazi for respondents No.8 to 10, 14, 15 and 17 Mr.S.E.Sidique for Respondents No.11, 12, 13 and 16 ....... [CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, and A.V.POTDAR, J.J.] DATE : 30th July 2009 PER COURT: 1. This is an application by which the applicant seeks to intervene in the petition. We have heard Mr.P.R.Patil, learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for respondents. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and the applicant is permitted to intervene in the petition. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] [P.V.HARDAS, J.] drp/ca5893-09 {3} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5596 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.389 OF 2009 Ayyub Khan Jaan Mohad Khan & Another APPLICANTS VERSUS Iliyas mamu Mohd Yusuf Lakhara & others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.Y.M.Khan h/f K.G.Khader, Advocate for applicants Mr.K.B.Chaudhari, AGP for respondents. Mr.C.R.Deshpande, Advocate for Respondents No.10 and 17 Mr.S.B.Talekar, Advocate for respondent No.14 Mr.S.S.Kazi for respondents No.8 to 10, 14, 15 and 17 Mr.S.E.Sidique for Respondents No.11, 12, 13 and 16 ....... [CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, and A.V.POTDAR, J.J.] DATE : 30th July 2009 PER COURT: 1. This is an application by which the applicant seeks to intervene in the petition. We have heard Mr.Y.M.Khan, learned counsel for the applicants and learned counsel for respondents. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and the applicants are permitted to intervene in the petition. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] [P.V.HARDAS, J.] drp/ca5893-09