IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8487 of 2008 1. SARBESH KUMAR SINGH, S/O DR.PANCHANAN SINGH, R/O ANISABAD, P.S.-ANISABAD, DISTRICT-PATNA. 2. DR.NAVIN CHANDRA PATHAK, S/O LATE BISHWANATH PATHAK, R/O VILLAGE-MADHAI SHAHPUR, P.S.-SHAHPUR, DISTRICT-BEGUSARAI. 3. JAGANNATH JHA, S/O LATE NAGESHWAR JHA, R/O VILLAGE-DUMRA, P.S.-CHATRA, DISTRICT- MADHUBANI. 4. RAJESH KUMAR SINGH, S/O ANNIRUDH PRASAD SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-MAINAGRAM, P.S.- SAHARSA, DISTRICT-SAHARSA. 5. SATYENDRA KUMAR, S/O LATE RAM CHARAN PRASAD, R/O VILLAGE-AHIYACHAK, P.S.- JAMSARI, DISTRICT-NALANDA.…………PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE SECRETARY-CUM-COMMISSIONER, HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION, HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. …………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2 16.08.2011 I.A. No.5488 of 2011 This I.A. has been filed bringing on record an office order of the Director, Secondary Education dated 20.04.2005 by which some corrections have been made in the appointment letter of the petitioner itself, but has been ordered to be effective from the date of issue of this order. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this order earlier came before 2 this Court for consideration in CWJC No. 10541 of 2009 and this Court by its order dated 08.10.2010 has held that correction in the appointment letter shall be applicable from the date of issue of appointment letter itself and not from the date of issue of this correction letter and this Court has also quashed the part of the order by which recovery has been ordered. The said order of the Director, Secondary Education has been annexed by the petitioner as Anenxure-8 with the I.A. and order of this Court passed in the said writ application as Annexure-9. The order of the Director is a general order and that has already been quashed by this Court in the order passed in the said writ application. Hence, there is no necessity to quash that order again in this writ application. The I.A. is accordingly disposed of. Learned counsels agree that the issue raised in this writ application has already been addressed and decided by this Court by the said order dated 08.10.2010 3 passed in the said CWJC No.10541 of 2009. In view of such stand of the parties, this writ application is also disposed of in terms of the said order. It is held that the said order shall be deemed to have been passed in the present writ application also with modification of dates and facts as may be deemed necessary. Arvind/ ( J.N. Singh, J.)