IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.378 of 2006 SUNIL PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3. 19.9.2008 No one appears for the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the State refers to paragraph No.9 of the supplementary counter affidavit sworn on 24.8.2007, in which it is stated that after considering the application of the petitioner, he was appointed as orderly in the Government Model Institute at Ara vide Memo No. 1113 dated 9.8.2007 which was personally received by the petitioner. In the aforesaid circumstances, the grievance of the petitioner having been already redressed, the writ application has become infructuous and it is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.)