BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty First day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon'ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15066 of 2011 1. PRABU 2. SUBRAMANIAN 3. MUTHULAKSHMI 4. RAJAMMAL : PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1&3 to 5 Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE TOWN POLICE STATION, ARUPPUKKOTTAI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. IN CR.NO.1566 OF 2011 : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. B.S.MELTIUE Advocate For Respondent : Mr. K.S.DURAIPANDIAN Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners were arrested on 13.11.2011 for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 2394(b), 324, 323 and 506(ii) of I.P.c. in Crime No.1566 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek bail. 2. Heard Mr.B.S.Meltiue, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Durai Pandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing for the State and also perused the materials available on record. 3. According to the case of prosecution, due to wordy quarrel between Muthulakshmi / Accused No.4 and Annalakshmi, on 12.11.2011, the other accused persons joined Muthulakshmi and attacked the de- facto complainant and his family members and caused injuries. On this allegation, the present case has been registered against them. 4. The learned Counsel for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit in his argument that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and no prejudice would be caused to https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the prosecution in the event of the petitioner's release on bail. He would also submit that they are also having permanent residence and therefore he would request for the grant of bail. 5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the injured has been discharged from the hospital on 15.11.2011. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that they are in judicial custody from 13.11.2011, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail, on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukkottai, and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for the purpose of interrogation. sd/- 21/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARUPPUKKOTTAI. 2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR. 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE SUB INSEPCTOR OF POLICE, TOWN POLICE STATION, ARUPPUKKOTTAI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. 5. THE OFFICER IN-CHARGE, SUB JAIL, SATTUR. 6. THE OFFICER IN-CHARGE, SUB JAIL, ARUPPUKKOTTAI. +1 CC to M/S. B.S.MELTIUE Advocate SR.No.40580 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15066 of 2011 NSV/21.11.11/2P/8C Date :21/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/