IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** C.W.P. No.22368 of 2011 Date of Decision:02.12.2011 Charanjit Singh .....Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. O.P. Kamboj, Advocate for the petitioner. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.(Oral) This petition has been filed for quashing of charge-sheet dated 29.4.2005 issued by respondent No.2 for causing financial loss of Rs.22,81,65,474.58 to the organisation. The inquiry reports and the findings given by the punishing authority have been challenged on the ground that as per requirement of Rule 13 of Punjab State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation Employees ( Punishment & Appeal) Rules, 1990, the punishing authority has to give finding on any article of charge and the reasons are to be recorded for disagreement, if any, with the findings given by the Inquiry Officer. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while passing the order by the punishing authority, no reasons/ findings have been recorded as to how he has not agreed with the findings given by the Inquiry Officer. Heard the argument of learned counsel for the petitioner and have also perused the impugned order as well as the other documents on the record. As per inquiry report, the petitioner has not been exonerated by the Inquiry Officer and a detailed order has been passed by the punishing authority wherein the ground for not agreeing with the findings recorded by the Inquiry Officer has been mentioned. The reasoning has also been given by the punishing authority wherein role of the petitioner as well as the findings given by the Inquiry Officer has been mentioned. No ground is made out to interfere in the case. Dismissed. December 02, 2011 ( DAYA CHAUDHARY ) renu JUDGE