1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION WRIT PETITION NO. 7152 OF 2009 Bhimraj s/o. Ananda Patil and others. .. petitioners Versus Jagannath s/o. Manik Patil through LRs and others. .. Respondent. --- Mr. V.B. Patil , Advocate for petitioner. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 4th November, 2009. ORAL ORDER :- 1] By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 14/7/2008, passed by the learned District Judge, Jalgaon, thereby allowing the application fled by the respondents for stay to the effect, operation and execution of the order passed in R.C.S. No. 416/2001. 2 2] Shri Patil, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by the impugned order, the learned appellate court has granted stay to the decree passed by the learned trial court for removal of encroachment. He further submits that even the reasons are not recorded by the trial court. 3] Since the petition arises out of a purely interlocutory order, I am not inclined to entertain the same in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 4] However, taking into consideration the nature of the controversy, the learned Appellate Court is directed to hear and decide the appeal pending before it, as expeditiously as possible, and in any case within a period of 3 months from today. 5] Writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid direction. [B.R. GAVAI,J.] Grt/-