1 (Crim wp 887 of 2010) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.887 OF 2010 Bharati Agarwal ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents ----- Mr. Kafil Khan and Ms. Savita A. Mundra for Petitioner Mrs. Mr.T. Tidake -APP for the State Mr.Raymond Samvel i/b. Priscilla Samuel for Respondent no.2 ----- WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1020 OF 2010 Rajiv Jalota ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents --- Mr.Raymond Samuel i/b. Priscilla Samuel for Petitioner Mrs. M.R. Tidake -APP for the State Mr. Kafil Khan and Savita Mundra for Respondent No.2 --- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 10TH AUGUST, 2010 2 (Crim wp 887 of 2010) P.C. 1. Both these petitions have been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and under section 482 of the Cr.P.C. for quashing the complaints filed by the Respondents in each petitions. 2. The Petitioners in both these petitions are the members of the co-operative housing society. There were some disputes between the members of the society and as a result, two FIRs were filed. One by the Petitioner in Writ Petition No.887 of 2010 and other by Shri Yogesh Acharekar- Respondent No.2 in the said Writ Petition. 3. Since now the parties have settled their dispute and they were expressed their willingness to quash their complaints in view of the judgments of the Apex Court in the cases of Jagdish Chanana vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr. reported in AIR 2008 SC 1968 and Madan Mohan Abbot vs. State of Punjab reported in AIR 2008 SC 1969, there is no reason why both these complaints should not be quashed. 4. Both these petitions are, accordingly, allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) in both the petitions and 3 (Crim wp 887 of 2010) disposed of. 5. All the parties are present in the Court. (V.M. KANADE J.)