c^, IN THE HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION (Sl N0.^ -^ /2011. PETITIONER: ^^ .^s^ %%>x .. ^"''y ^' ^" Arjunlal Gupta, son of Jarban Gupta, aged about 52 years, workiag as Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Baradoli, Block Pussour, Tahsil Pussour, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. »'»• versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary Education Department, D.K-S.Bhawan, Raipur, CIihattisgarh. 2. District Education Officer, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 3. Joint Du-ector, Treasuiy and Accounts, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. J^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISG.WH AT BILASPLTR <> pE'rmoNER WRIT PETITION (S} No. 2276 of2011 Arjunlal Gupta. VERSUS State ofChliattisgarh RESPON7DENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION <3F INDIA SB; Hon'ble Sfari Satish K. Asml'otn.J. Present: 1. 2. 3. 4. Shii C.J.K.Rao, Advocate fbrthe petitioner Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawver for flie ents. (Passed on 2QU1 day ofApril, 2011) Leanied counsel appearuig tor the petitioner, on mstmctions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberh' to make a representation in the liglit of circular dated 05.01.2011 issued by the Govemment of Clihattisgarh, School Education Leamed counsel appearing for other side has no objection. No pemiissioa ofthis Court is required to make representation to fte respondent autliorities. Thus, such direction cannot be issued. However, ifthe petitioners make a representation to the respondent authorities. the saine mav be considered and decided in accordance with law, on its own merits and perspective. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit