IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10209 of 2009 Suresh Das, son of Harendra Das, resident of village Kothiya, P.S. Baruraj, District Muzaffarpur Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Bhagirath Das, son of Late Chauki Das 3. Sharmila Devi, wife of Suresh Das, both resident of village Belsar, P.S. Sahebganj, District Muzaffarpur ----------- 02/ 17.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner the State and the Complainant. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence under Section 498A and other allied Sections of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He is the husband of the complainant. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is always ready and willing to continue the matrimonial ties with the complainant and for that purpose he shall file written undertaking on affidavit on or before 1.9.2009 in the court below. Counsel for the complainant states that complainant has also no objection in resuming the matrimonial life, provided the petitioner does not insist for providing him with a motorcycle. No sooner the aforesaid affidavit is filed in the court below, petitioner, Suresh Das be admitted to the privilege of provisional bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Rs. Five 2 thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.K. Singh, Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, West Muzaffarpur in connection with Complaint Case No. C696 of 2008, subject to the conditions, as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and on that day itself the complainant should be available in court when petitioner in presence of the court should persuade her to come back to the matrimonial home and should take her to the matrimonial home and the matrimonial relationship between the parties be monitored by the court below until such time the court below is satisfied that the matrimonial peace prevails between them. It is, however, made clear that the court below shall be at liberty to pass appropriate orders either confirming the provisional bail or cancelling the provisional bail considering the reasonableness of the stand of the parites. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. Let this order be communicated to the court below through fax on payment of usual charges by the petitioner. Arjun/ ( V.N. Sinha, J.)