vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7186 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.7186 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.7186 OF 2008 Ram Lal Garg ... Petitioner V/s. Central Bank of India through its Dy. General Manager (HRD) & anr. ... Respondents Mr.N.V. Walawalkar with S.K. Shinde i/b Sagar Kasar for Petitioner Mr.R.L. Shethia for Respondent CORAM: SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J MHATRE, J MHATRE, J. DATED: DECEMBER 16, 2008 DECEMBER 16, 2008 DECEMBER 16, 2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The petitioner has challenged an interim order passed by the appellate authority under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act. By this order, the petitioner has been directed to deposit half the damages ascertained and ordered to be paid by the Estate Officer. He has also been directed to furnish a bank guarantee for the remainder of the amount. 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the Bank had by its letters issued in March 2008 stated that in case the petitioner overstayed in the premises, he would be liable to pay "damages at the prevailing market rate of Rs.15,000/- per month from : 2 : 4.9.2007". The learned Counsel submits that when such letters have been issued, the Estate Officer ought not to have computed the damages @Rs.102/- per sq.ft. In my opinion, these submissions cannot be considered at this stage. The order passed is an interim order which is in my opinion, not perverse. Therefore, there is no need to interfere with the order impugned in this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 3. Petition is rejected.