IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 27th day of August, 2009 First Bail Application No. 853 of 2009 Criminal Side Anand Singh S/o Shri Shyam Lal R/o Village Kurdi-Bhagwanpur P.S. –Kotwali Laksar District Haridwar. ……...Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ……….Opposite Party Arising out of Case Crime No. 100 of 2009 Under Sections: 302/34 I.P.C. P.S.: Kotwali Laksar District: Haridwar. _____________________________________________________________________________ Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J Heard Shri Arvind Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the applicant and Shri B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. Applicant-Anand Singh, who is in jail in connection with case crime No. 100 of 2009, relating to offence punishable under Section 302/34 I.P.C., P.S.: Kotwali Laksar, District-Haridwar, has sought his release on bail. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is not named in the First Information Report. It is a case of circumstantial evidence. It is further contended that there is no recovery from the present applicant. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after going through the papers on record, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant deserves bail. Let the applicant- Anand Singh, be released on bail on executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar. Dt. 27.08.2009 (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) S