•?,AT A Mohan Mittal S/o late Banarsidas Mittal, aged aboi.it- 42 years:, .-•<^ . "„ .' .,.<^\rr'- /- occupation-Business, Jhawar C/ i-'' ..^ Gudakhu Factoi-y Main Road ^ •i?'' -:y" , .'( '^ o fT.S nw.'i 2. •3 Lailunga, Tahsii-LaUunga Distt. Raigari"i(C.G.) '&• /'o L.ate Gajanand Agrawal, aged about-40 years, occupation- business, Agrawal Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). Murlidhar Agrawal S/o late Late Gajanand Agrawal, aged about-40 years, occupation- business, Agrawal Gudakhu Fa.ctory Kharsia, TaJ-isil- Kharsia, Distt. Rcdgarh (C.G.) 'athore S/o Raixi.ratan aged about-56 years, occiipation AgTawai G-'iidaJihu Factor}r /Partner R/o Purani Basti Kharsia, ^Distt. Raigarh (C.G.j. State of Chhattisgarh through District Magistrate, Raigarh Distt. yingh Kattiore If V Q fs' ^.^S. V £,^f HKH COURT OF CHH4TTIS6ARH AT BILASPUI HON'BLE wiR. I.M.QUuDV»I._& F.A.^Io, 51/2011 Vs Mohan Mittai Anand Agarwal & another Mr. M.K. Sinha, Advocate with Mrs. Bulbut Aqarwal, Advocate for the Advocate with -AAr. Amit Sharma, Advocate for the '. B.P. Sharma, respondents. ind (22nd November. 2011) 1. The qipellant has flled this appeal against the order dated 15.12.2010 passed by 1+ie learned District Judge, ftaipur in Civil Suit No.60-A/2010 whereby the learned District Judge has aliowed the appiication fiied by the respondents herein under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC and rejected the plaint of the appellant herein. 2. At the outset, tearned counsel appear'mg for the appellcnt has submitted that the appellant wants to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file a fresh suit before the court below. 3. Learned counse! appearing for the respondents haye submitted that the respondents have no objection to the same. 4. Accordingly, the appeai is dismissed as wjthdrawn with the liberty to the appellant to fjle fresh civil suit before the court betow concerned. Consequently, I.A. No.7 also stands dismissed. ). Certified CODY as Der rules. -'—' Sd/- G. Minhajuddin Judge Sd/- I.M.Quddusi Judge