IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 22ND SEPTEMBER 2008 / 31ST BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 20892 of 2008(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ P.AMEER, S/O KOMU HAJI, PARAMMAL HOUSE P.O. VATTALUR, VIA,. MAKKARAPARAMB, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SAJU J.VALLYARA RESPONDENTS: ------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHROITY, MALAPPURAM, BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.(C) NO.20892 OF 2008 EXT.P1 PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE R.T.A, MALAPPURAM, HELD ON 27.12.2007 VIDE ITEM NO..7. //true copy// P.A. TO JUDGE. V. GIRI, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.20892 of 2008 ------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd September, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioner has been granted a regular permit for plying on the route Melattur-Cherpulassery-Alanellur. But he is aggrieved that the permit is yet to be issued. 2. I heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. 3. In the result, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to issue a permit, in terms of Ext.P1, provided such order is still in force, going by the priority to be maintained in the office of RTA, Malappuram, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. But it is made clear that in the process of doing so, if any other person is entitled to a permit, on the strength of an order obtained from the competent authority, the same shall not be over looked, in the course of compliance of this judgment. V. GIRI, JUDGE nj.