* 1 * FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 1222 OF 2005 W I T H CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2063 OF 2005 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 1222 OF 2005 W I T H CIVIL APPLICAITON NO. 729 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 1222 OF 2005 Thane Municipal Corp. thru.its Commissioner V/s.Halimunnisa Abdul Samani & Ors W I T H CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 728 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 1222 OF 2005 [ 1.Halimunnisa Abdul Samani & Ors. V/s.Thane Municipal Corp. thru.its Commissioner Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s order or Court’s or Judge’s orders directions and Registrar orders Mr.Mandar Limaye with Ms.Suyog Londhe h/f.Mr. R.S.Apte,adv.for appellant. Ms.Dwidevi h/f.Mr.R.P.Mudholkar,adv.for respondent no.1. * 2 * Ms.Rohini Karvl i/by.M/s.Little & Co.,adv.for respondent no.2. Ms.S.P.Manchekar, AGP for respondent no.3. Mr.N.D.Sharma,adv.for respondent no.4. CORAM: SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATED: 17TH JULY, 2009. P.C. : 1. Heard counsel for both sides. 2. The appellant has preferred this Second Appeal to challenge the correctness and legality of the order dated 2nd November, 2004 passed by the IIIrd Ad-hoc Addl.Sessions Judge, Thane in Civil Appeal No.123 of 2003. The said appeal was filed not by the appellant in the present appeal but by respondent no.2. The present appellant did not challenge the original judgment and decree of the trial court dated 26th August, 2003 passed by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Thane in Spl.Civil Suit No.389 of 1999. Therefore, the Second Appeal is not maintainable. The same is accordingly disposed off. * 3 * 3. With the disposal of the Appeal,Civil Application No. 2063 of 2005, Civil Application No. 729 of 2009 and Civil Application No.728 of 2009 do not survive. The same are accordingly disposed off. [JUDGE]