IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 14288 of 2008 Between: 1 The Ex-Officio Secretary to Government, Consumer Affairs, Food and Civil Supplies Department, A.P.Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Civil Supplies, Civil Supplies Bhavan, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, A.P.,-500 080 ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Sri. M.Bharat Reddy, District Supply Officer(City), Visakhapatnam. 2 The Andra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, rep. by its Registrar, Purani Haveli, Hyderabad-500 002 2nd respondent is a formal party, .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order direction especially one in the nature of writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the orders issued in C.A.No.324/2008 in O.A.Nop.6087/2006 dated 19-06-2008 including all further proceedings relating thereto on the ﬁle of Hon'ble A.P.Administrative Tribunal and to quash the Proceedings and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:THE ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.: . The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.14288 of 2008 O R D E R: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) This writ petition is ﬁled questioning the order dated 19.6.2008 passed in C.A.No.324 of 2008 in O.A.No.6087 of 2006 on the file of A.P.Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad. 2. Respondents 1 and 2 in the O.A. are the writ petitioners and the 1st respondent is the applicant in the O.A. On 08.7.2008 we have granted interim suspension of the impugned order. On 23.7.2008, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for respondents states that the review D.P.C. has already been constituted and it will complete the exercise within ten days and, therefore, the matter was directed to be posted after ten days for reporting compliance. Thereafter, the Special Government Pleader has produced before us the G.O.Rt.No.109, dated 12.8.2008, by virtue of which, a panel of District Supply Oﬃcers for the panel year 2002-2003 was prepared, as per the directions of the A.P.Administrative Tribunal and this Court. Subsequently, the respondents have also passed an order in Memo No.1019/CS.II/2007-3 dated 12.8.2008. By virtue of the same, the case of the unoﬃcial respondent was considered and the same was communicated holding that his case was not considered during subsequent panel years based on the availability of vacancies. No junior to him in District Supply Oﬃcer cadre has been included in the panel year of 2002-2003. 3. Though the learned counsel for the unoﬃcial respondent raised contentions regarding the maintainability of the writ petition, since the writ petition itself has become infructuous, we are not inclined to go into this aspect. 4. Since the unoﬃcial respondent has challenged these proceedings by ﬁling a O.A. before the Tribunal, the writ petition has become infructuous. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. ___________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED,J _______________ C.V.RAMULU,J 28th August, 2008. PNV THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.14288 of 2008 28th August, 2008