y - -^- i^ c^- < BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR APPELLANTS 01AIMANTS M.A.(C) No. II'71 /2010 1. Smt. Sunita Bai, Widow of Late ^- Ganeshwar Giri, aged about 21 years, ^<A ... \/<'/*'v^/v 2: Minor Hemant Kumar, S/o late Shri '.•V'""^QJ^A' ^' Ganeshwar Giri, aged about 2 (^•"""Q^ ^^.^^-"" years, ...^ ^^- ^" RESPONDENTS Appettant No.1 through herself and her minor son appellant no. 2 Both R/o Village Dodkachouda, Tahsil and District Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS 1,. Sugan Ram, S/o late Atwaram / Munda, caste Munda, aged about 22 years, R/o Village Balachapar, Tahsil and District Jashpur (C.G.) (OWNER) 2. The Orientat Insurance Company ^" Limited, Locat Branch Office, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) (INSURER) APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OFTHE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT. HI^H COUftT OF CHH^TTIS^ARH AT BILASPUft DIVISION BENCH: HON'BLE ^R. I^'A.QUDDUSI A HON'BLE MR.PMSH^NT KUM^R MISHM. JJ. Appellaiits Claimants ftespondents Misc. Apped (O No.1171/2010 Smt. Sunita Bai & another Vs Sugam Ram and another ORbER (OraD (13th January, 2011) I.M. Quddusi. J; 1. When the matter is called out, none appeared on behalf of the appelfant. Even in the second calj none appeared. 2. How/ever, Mr. Azad Siddique Advocate and Mrs. Chitra Shrivastava, Advocote are present for respondent No.l & 2 respectively. 3. In view of the above, we have no other option except to dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution. j4^Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- I-M.Quddusi Judge Sd//- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge ^