..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1261 OF 2007 Rajan Shankarrao Jadhav ...Applicant. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Mr.V.V.Purwant, Adv. for the Applicant. Mr.S.S.Pednekar, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 18th April, 2007. DATED : 18th April, 2007. DATED : 18th April, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in C.R.No.I-304 of 2007 of Faujdar Chawadi Police Station, Solapur. The said case is under Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Prevention of Immoral Traffic Act. 3. A punter was sent to Saheli Lodge as it was learnt that immoral cases of trafficking were going on in the said lodge. Thereafter raid was ..(2).. effected at the said lodge. The FIR shows that the applicant and his brother Shekhar Jadhav are running the said lodge. 4. Mr.Purwant, submitted that the remand report clearly shows that Shekhar Jadhav, brother of the applicant is the owner of the said lodge. He has submitted that the brother of the applicant and the applicant are residing separate and the applicant has nothing to do with the said lodge. 5. On perusal of the remand application, it is seen that it is stated therein that the applicant and his brother - Shekhar Jadhav together are running brothel in the said lodge. As stated earlier, the FIR also implicates the present applicant. The offence is of a serious nature. Hence, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant. Application is rejected. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)