IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39991 of 2009 NAROTTAM KUMAR @ NAWAL KUMAR, son of Ramotar Singh, resident of Village Badahiya, P.S. Badahiya, District Lakhisarai. ----Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 3.12.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The offence alleged against the petitioner, who is apprehending his arrest in a police case, is under sections 498A and 304B/34 of the Penal Code. It is submitted that the petitioner, who is “Phupha” of the husband of the deceased, has been implicated in this case on vague allegation of demand. It is submitted that as a matter of fact, the deceased died due to ailment, which would be appearing from the medical report, as contained in Annexure 2 series. Besides, the husband of the deceased has been allowed anticipatory bail by this Court as per the order dated 8th of January, 2008 passed in Cr.Misc. No.43473 of 2007, as contained in Annexure 3. Learned APP appearing for the State is not in a position to refute the above submissions. 2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Barh P.S. Case No.343 of 2006 within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh, Patna, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)