IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15348 of 2011 Madhumala w/o Binod Prasad resident of village- Jagarnathpur, P.O. Sonhula Block Kuchai Kote, P.S. Gopalpur, District- Gopalganj at present posted Panchayat teacher new constructed Primary school Sonuhula Damodar at Sonuhula Gokhul Panchayat Block Kuchai Koate, District.Gopalganj… Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar 2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar at Patna. 3. Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar at Patna. 4. Regional Deputy Director, Saran at Chapra. 5. The District Magistrate, Gopalganj. 6. The District Teacher Appointment Tribunal/Pradhikari, Gopalganj. 7. The District Superintendent of Education, Gopalganj 8. The Block Education Officer, Kuchai Kote. 9. Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Sonhula Gokhul, P.S. Kuchai Kote District- Gopalganj. 10. Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Sonuhula Gokhul, P.S. Kuchai Kote, District- Gopalganj. …………………. Respondents. ---------------------------------- 3. 8.11.2011 Being aggrieved by the order dated 25.7.2011 passed by the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Gopalganj, the petitioner has filed the present writ application. However, instead of challenging the order on the basis of facts and merits of the case, the petitioner has made uncalled for allegations relying upon the newspaper reports for assailing the same. The allegations have been made that the impugned order is mala fide and further that the Appellate Authority is not 2 performing its work honestly and the Office Clerks are managing the work and judgment and in this regard reliance is placed on certain newspaper reports. The District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority is a quasi-judicial Tribunal and any such allegations made in the writ petition are totally uncalled for, that too, without any basis except a news paper report in support of the same. For the said action, both the petitioner as also his counsel can be proceeded against under the contempt jurisdiction of this Court. However, considering the entire matter, the writ petition is dismissed with a warning to the petitioner as also his counsel to be careful in future in drafting any petition before this Court and not to make uncalled for and unsubstantiated allegations against any quasi- judicial Authority in the same. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.)