IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.8279 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 20.12.2010 Raj Mohini @ Pinki and another ....Petitioners Versus Rattan Devi and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. H.S. Thiara, Advocate, for the petitioners. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that a compromise has arrived at between the claimants and as per compromise parents have agreed to give their share of the award in favour of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that as per the settlement arrived at between the parties, a proper application shall be moved before the Tribunal for modification of the award seeking direction that entire claim amount shall be paid to the petitioner as per the settlement. He seeks permission to withdraw this petition with the aforesaid liberty. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. In the event of moving such an application, learned Tribunal after verifying the said compromise, shall be at liberty to modify the award in accordance with law. (Alok Singh) Judge December 20, 2010 R.S.