1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.NO.7894 OF 2008 IN MCA ST.NO.20400/2007 IN REJ.S.A.NO.859/07. Jose Thomas Virky Thomas ..vs.. Ku.Samina Ali Meer Muzammil Ali and ors. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- C ORAM : C.L.PANGARKAR, J. DATED : 17th September, 2009. Heard Adv.Mr.Joshi holding for Adv. A.S.Jaiswal for the appellant. These applications have been field for restoration of the appeal and for condonation of delay in preferring the restoration application. The appeal came to be dismissed for non-removal of the office objections. There was some confusion with regard to the memorandum of the appeal that was to be filed as two appeals were filed. It is stated that other memo of appeal, which was required to be filed was misplaced and therefore delay has occurred. In view of this, the appeal stands restored to file. The delay stands condoned. JUDGE. chute