1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4113 OF 2008 Nivruti Arjun Vanave ..Petitioner. Vs. The Deputy Director of Health Services and another ..Respondents. .... Mr. N.V. Bandiwadekar for the Petitioner. Mr. S.N. Patil, AGP for Respondent No.1. .... CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 24th June, 2008. P.C. : By the impugned order, the Industrial Court has declined to grant interim relief against discontinuation of the services of the Petitioner. The reasons which have been furnished in paragraph 10 of the impugned judgment cannot be regarded as perverse so as to warrant interference by this Court in the extra ordinary jurisdiction, particularly against an interlocutory order. Hence, the Petition shall stand dismissed. However, it is clarified that all the observations contained in the impugned order of the Industrial Court and in the present order as well are confined to the disposal of the application for interim relief and shall not come in the way of 2 the disposal of the complaint of unfair labour practices on merits. It would be open to the Petitioner to apply for expeditious disposal of the complaint and in the event that such an application is made, the Industrial Court may duly consider it subject to the exigencies of its own work. *****