IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 12TH AUGUST 2011 / 21ST SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 22063 of 2011(G) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ K.LALITHA BAI,W/O.LATE RAVEENDRAN NAIR, AGED 48 YEARS,HEAD CLERK,BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, KANJIKUZHY,ALAPPUZHA,(NOW UNDER TRANSFER TO BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICE,PANOOR,KANNUR DISTRICT)RESIDING AT RAVI NIVAS,THEKKETHUKAVALA,PONKUNNAM-686519, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.A.CHACKO RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, COMMISSIONERATE OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.SMITHA SUKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss W.P.(C) NO.22063/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE ORDER DT. 12.4.2011 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P2:- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION 20.4.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER THROUGH PROPER CHANNEL TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P3:- COPY OF THE ORDER NO.2179/ESTT. C3/2011/CRD DTD. 19.7.2011 ISSUED BY THE SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER OF 2ND RESPONDENT. P4:- COPY OF THE G.O.(P) 22/2009 /P&ARD DTD. 30.12.2009. P5:- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT.D 20.7.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL:- TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO.22063 OF 2011 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner is working as Head Clerk in Block Development Office, Kanjikuzhy in Alappuzha District. As per Ext.P3 order, the petitioner was transferred from there to Block Development Office, Panoor in Kannur District. Feeling aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P5 representation dated 20.7.2011 before the second respondent. It is on being aggrieved by the inaction on Ext.P5 that this Writ Petition has been filed. 2. Evidently, the petitioner has already raised her grievances against Ext.P3 before the second respondent through Ext.P5 and it is still pending consideration. In the circumstances, without making any observation as to the claims of the petitioner raised in this Writ Petition as also in Ext.P5, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Needless to say that before passing orders on Ext.P5, persons/persons likely to be affected shall also be put on notice. (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) spc W.P.(C) NO. 2 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. JUDGMENT September, 2010 W.P.(C) NO. 3