IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36579 of 2008 BANSIDHAR SHARMA @ BHAGLU SHARMA son of Late Brij Nandan Sharma resident of village- Musepur Khaira, P.S.- Daud Nagar, District- Aurangabad Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 14.11.2008 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused for the offence under section 25(1-B) A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the alleged recovery is from his house, however the uncle of the petitioner is having a licensed gun, and as such, recovery should not be taken for any other consideration. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the recovery was made from the house of the petitioner without any appropriate explanation, and as such, prayer for anticipatory bail deserves to be dismissed. Considering the above submissions and in facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to this petitioner. His prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is, accordingly, rejected. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)