1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 99 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO. 953 OF 2005 AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO. OF 2007 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 99 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO. 953 OF 2005 Raghav Purusha & Anr. .... Petitioner. (Orig.Plaintiffs) V/s. Deepak Ravi kapoor. .... Respondent. (Orig. Defendant/Contemnor) ....... Mr. V.R. Tripathi for the Petitioner. Ms. S. Surve i/b. Little & Co. for the Respondent. ........ CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 11TH JANUARY 2008. P.C. :- At the hearing of the Contempt Petition, Counsel for the Contemnor has tendered an unconditional apology and stated that the 2 Contemnor would hand over possession to the Petitioner of the premises as envisaged in the Consent Terms on or before 18th January 2008. In that view of the matter, Counsel for the Petitioner has not pressed the Contempt Petition. The Petitioner would be at liberty to apply for revival of the Contempt Petition in the event that the statement which is made before the Court is not complied with. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner states that the Contemnor would be permitted to remove his furniture and fixtures within the aforesaid period of one week. The Petition is disposed of. ----------