1 S.B.Civil Second Appeal No.321/2006. Panna Ram. vs. Om Prakash and others. Date : 16.4.2007 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. S Sharma, for the appellant. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the appellant. The plaintiff/appellant filed the suit for cancellation of sale deed dated 21.8.1986 executed by his own brother Nathu Ram. According to the plaintiff, originally land was recorded in the name of defendant no.1 alone but according to the plaintiff, it was due to the fault of the revenue authorities. Two courts below rejected the plaintiff's contention that the suit property was joint Hindu family property and also did not find the document of family settlement as reliable document. Since the two courts below have considered every 2 piece of evidence available on record as well as documents relied upon by the plaintiff very carefully and thereafter recorded the finding of fact, I do not find any substantial question of law involved in this appeal. Consequently, this second appeal, having no merit, is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya