1 WP 6930.10.sxw JPP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6930 OF 2010 Vimi Vinod Chopra. ... Petitioner. V/s. Vinod Gulshan Chopra ... Respondent. Mr. V.R. Dhond i/b. M/s. T.N. Tripathi & Co. for the Petitioner. Ms. Manjula Rao i/b. Mr. Pradeep S. Chavan for the Respondent. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 7th MARCH 2011. P.C. :- The Respondent herein has filed Petition for divorce in the Family Court at Bombay being Petition No.A-652 of 2008. In the said Petition, the Respondent filed an application for access as regards the three children in favour of the Respondent below Exhibit 43 being order dated 14th October 2009. By the said order, access has been provided to the Respondent in regard to three children viz. Sonali, Divya and Aryan on every 1st and 3rd working Saturday of the month at the children complex, Family Court, Bombay. This order has been challenged by the Petitioner herein by filing this Petition in or about August 2010. 2 WP 6930.10.sxw 2. The Petition has not been admitted up till now. Today, it was for admission. More than one and half year has elapsed from the date of passing of the order dated 14th October 2009. Presently, eldest daughter is aged 16 years, next daughter is aged 15 years and son is aged about 9 years old. 3. Looking to the fact that the order is dated 14th October 2009 and the growing ages of the children, it would be proper if the Petitioner applies to the learned Judge of the Family Court for modification of the order dated 14th October 2009 by placing in the said application changed circumstances and difficulties if any, faced by the Petitioner in not complying with order dated 14th October 2009. In view of the above, this Petition stands disposed of by passing following order :- (i) It would be open for the Petitioner to make an application to the learned Judge of the Family Court for modification of the order dated 14th October 2009 stating therein the changed circumstances under which the modification is sought as also stating therein difficulties which may be faced by her in complying with the order. Till that application is decided, order dated 14th October 2009 i.e. the order impugned in this Petition shall operate in favour of the Respondent. 3 WP 6930.10.sxw (ii) If such an application is filed, the learned Judge of the Family Court, Bombay shall hear and dispose of the said application as expeditiously as possible. 4. It was mentioned by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner that by a separate order, defence of the Petitioner has been struck off. If the Petitioner is aggrieved by that order, it will be open for the Petitioner to challenge that order. It is noticed that by order dated 12th October 2010 certain directions were issued and the Senior Child Specialist of Muskaan, Child & Adolescent Guidance Centre, T.I.S.S. attached to Family Court was directed to interview the children and submit a report. Said report is on record. 5. In the proceedings which may be filed by the Petitioner challenging the order of striking off defences, either parties are free to make use of the said report. The Petition stands disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs. 6. Before I part with this order, it is required to be observed that the Judges of the Family Court at Bombay are passing orders without mentioning the names of the Advocate, who appeared in the respective case. This poses difficulty in reading the said order or a Judgment in a proper manner. It is necessary that an order passed by a Judge must mention the name of the Advocate who appeared on behalf of the respective parties. Hence, the learned Judges of the Family Court shall hereafter mention the names of the Advocates who 4 WP 6930.10.sxw appeared before them in the matter in which the Judgment or order has been delivered. The Registrar General shall forward a copy of this order to the learned Principal Judge of the Family Court at Bombay. The learned Principal Judge of the Family Court at Bombay shall bring this order to the notice of all the Judges who are presently presiding at Family Court, Bombay for acting in terms of the said order. The learned Principal Judge shall report compliance about the intimation of this order to the Judges of the Family Court, Bombay. The Registry shall place the said compliance report before this Court. (R.Y. GANOO, J.)