1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 65 OF 2009 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 65 OF 2009 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 65 OF 2009 IN IN IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL ST. NO.29722 OF 2008 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL ST. NO.29722 OF 2008 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL ST. NO.29722 OF 2008 IN IN IN WRIT PETITON NO.3994 OF 2008 WRIT PETITON NO.3994 OF 2008 WRIT PETITON NO.3994 OF 2008 Shankar Bapu Nimbalkar. .. Applicant. vs. Ashta Lokmanya Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Mydt. & Anr. .. Respondents. Applicant in person. Mr. A.B. Vagyani for Respondent No. 1. Mr. R.M. Patne, AGP., for Respondent No. 2. CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE: 5TH MARCH, 2009 DATE: 5TH MARCH, 2009 DATE: 5TH MARCH, 2009 P.C. . Heard. 2. Though we are not satisfied with the reasons stated in the application for condonation of delay but in order to give a fair opportunity to the applicant we 2 are inclined to condone the delay but subject to cost which we quantify at Rs. 5000/-. On the applicant paying costs of Rs. 5000/- to the respondent no. 1 within a period of two weeks, delay would stand condoned. We make it clear that if the cost is not paid to the respondent no. 1, the application would stand rejected without further reference to the Court. If the order is complied with, then, the Letters Patent Appeal be registered and placed for admission in due course. 3. Before parting with this order we would advise the applicant to engage an advocate in the matter particularly considering the pleadings in the application for condonation of delay which appear to be irresponsible. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.) (Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.) (Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.)