1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 634 OF 2006 Vinayak S/o Pandhari Karad Age : 33 Years, Occ.: Agril. R/o : Rameshwar, Tq. & Dist. Latur. .... PETITIONER V E R S U S Sau. Mangal W/o Vinayak Karad Age : 27 Years, Occ. : Labour, R/o : Rameshwar, Tq. : Latur, Dist. : Beed. .... RESPONDENT Mr. G.D.Kale holding for Mr. M.V. Nagargoje, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. U.B.Bondar, Advocate for Respondent. [ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. ] DATE : 18/09/2009. ORAL JUDGMENT : 1. Heard Mr. G.D.Kale and Mr. U.B.Bondar for respective parties. 2. Rule. By consent, finally decided. 2 3. By order dated 2/4/2009, brother Judge granted Rule and the hearing is expedited. The husband was aggrieved by Order dated 14/8/2002 passed by the learned J.M.F.C. in Misc. Crim. Application No. 204 of 1999 and thereafter the Order passed by learned 2nd Adhoc Sessions Judge on 12/2/2004 in Criminal Revision Application No. 92 of 2002. The Award of maintenance @ Rs. 500/- per month and thereafter enhancement @ Rs. 750/- per month by the learned Court and rejection of husband’s petition, is impugned with the income, the husband was drawing. The learned Judge considered the provisions of Section 125 of Code of Criminal Procedure and found that the wife was unable to maintain herself and it was an obligation of the husband to provide her legitimate resource for her life. I do not think any illegality in the order under challenge. The dismissal of revision is must. The present Criminal Writ Petition thus dismissed. Rule discharged. [ K.U.CHANDIWAL ] JUDGE knp/Cri.WP634.06