IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND NINE ONLY WRIT PETITION NO : 12834 of 2009 Between: 1 Bathula Yadaiah Goud S/o.Kistaiah Goud R/o.Bakaram Village, Moinabad Mandal, Rangareddy District. 2 Mr.Yelgani Yadaiah Goud S/o.Narayana Goud R/o.Bakaram Village, Moinabad Mandal, Rangareddy District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Proh. & Excise Superintendent, Rajendranagar, Rangareddy District at Hyderabad, Government of Andhra Pradesh. 2 The Proh. & Excise Inspector, SHO Chevella, Rangareddy District, Government of Andhra Pradesh. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.Amarnath Goud Thodupunuri Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Prohibition & Excise This Court made the following: ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside orders dated 12-5-2009 passed by respondent No.1, whereby he suspended the TFT licenses of the petitioners, pertaining to counter Nos.2 and 4 of Bakaram village, Moinabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. A perusal of the impugned orders passed by respondent No.1 shows that some quantity of I.D. liquor, i.e., 80 liters and 20 liters respectively, was found in the houses of petitioners 1 and 2; and that on the allegation that they are conducting sales in the village in counter Nos.2 and 4 respectively belonging to them, respondent No.1 suspended their TFT licenses. Ordinarily, the Writ Petition deserves to be dismissed in limine for the reason that the petitioners have an alternative remedy of filing appeals. However, at the hearing, Sri T.Amarnath Goud, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that since the enquiry is pending, respondent No.1 may be directed to complete the same and pass appropriate orders within a reasonable time. As I find this request of the learned counsel reasonable, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.1 to complete the enquiry and pass appropriate final orders, after giving the petitioners an opportunity of hearing, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. ----------------------------- ------- C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:07-7-2009 MNR