fur? IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 3mm£ §%W w.P.(s)No. mm. /201o 2/, PETITIONER: MANSAY MANDAVI , S/o —La’re Shri Pr'a’rapsingh Mandavi, Mo’rher's name smT. Sham‘ibai Mandavi, Aged— abouf 36 year, cas’re Goand, R/o —village Kakaipar, Pos’r GooTaTol Tah.-‘ Mohala, Disf. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Versus 1. f S‘ra‘re of Chha’r’riSgar‘h, Through:— The Secre‘rary, School EducaTion DeparTmen‘r, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) Responden’r V/ 2. The CoHec’ror‘ Rajnandgaon, Dis’r. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3. The Assis’ran’r Commissioner Tribal [A.C.T.] Rajnandgaon, CollecTomTe buiiding Rajnandgaon , Dist. Rajnandgaon (6.6.) s The Dis‘rric’r Educa’rion Officer Rajnandgaon, Collec’ror‘cn‘e building Rajnandgaon , Dist. Rajnandgaon (6.6.) 5. /Block Education Officer Mahala, Manpur Road Mohaia, Dis’r’ Rajnandgaon (CG) // 6‘ Pur'ainbai w/o shr‘i Baldev Mandavi [58 year] Aged abou‘r 52 year‘, So called 2“ wife of LaTe shr'i Pr‘aTapsingh Mandavi, R/o -vi llage Karmar‘i Tah.- Mohala, Dist— Rajnandgaon (C6) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI PROHABITAION, el’c. AND / OR FOR ORDER AND / OR DIECTION / DIRECTIONS IN NATURE OF WRIT. 3%: W, WE W mm PC§§N¢H$3>1 zboo mmaaiaw)’ ' ' mmws‘am mama?“ *Wm E : HON’BLE MR. JU$TE€E PR 27.983010 Shri Vijay KDeshmukh, cou sel for the petitioner. Shri Vaibhav Goverdhan, PL for the Siate/rasps. 1 ta 5. Contention of Shri Deshmu h is that father of the petitioner late Pratap Singh Mandavi died on ’th Januaiy 2010 when he was in service. He submits that the p titioner has already made an application after ccmpleting all the ormaiities seeking compassionate appointment but the said appiicati n has not been decided tiii date. He submits that the representation .)f the petitioner (Annexure P/ '7} is pending and therefore direction may be issued to the concerned authorities for deciding the same ex )editiousiy‘ State counsei has no objeotion if direction is issued for deciding the representation of the pt titioner in accordance with iawr In View of apove facts, the prc sent petition is disposed of with a direction the respondents 1 85 ’2 tc decide the representation of'the petitioner expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of it 1is order. The petitioner would be at liberty to file a fresh representation also along with the copy of this order. ' z/ __a Sdl- Pritinker Diwaker d Juge S IT