Civil Revision No. 4294 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 4294 of 2011 Date of Decision: 19.07.2011 *** Jagdish Pal Singh .. Petitioner Vs. Gurwinder Kaur .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present:- Mr. Rajiv Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. The petitioner is the defendant in the suit for injunction filed by the respondent. As an interim measure, on the application filed by the plaintiff under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2, the learned trial Court directed the parties to maintain status quo over the suit property, vide order dated 19.4.2011. Though the petitioner preferred an appeal, but the same has also been dismissed by the learned appellate Court by virtue of order dated 2.6.2011. Dis-satisfied with the same present revision petition has been preferred. Heard. It is evident from the records that both the parties are claiming their rights over the suit property. The claim of the plaintiff is that she became the owner of the suit property by virtue of registered gift deed dated 6.6.2003 as well as registered Will dated 6.5.2005 alleged to have been executed by original owner Gurcharan Singh in her favour. While, on the other hand, the defendant claimed his right over the suit property on the basis of succession being the adopted son of Gurcharan Singh. Both the Courts below were of the view that genuineness of claim of the parties can only be ascertained on the basis of evidence led by them and in order to Civil Revision No. 4294 of 2011 2 preserve the suit property and to keep intact the existing state of affairs at the site during the pendency of the suit, direction to maintain status quo is necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case. No illegality or perversity could be found with the approach adopted by the Courts below. Dismissed. (ARVIND KUMAR) July 19, 2011 JUDGE Jiten