IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26766 of 2011 Laxman Yadav, Son of Shri Nunu Yadav, resident of village-Jhaura, P.S.+ District-Supaul. Versus The State of Bihar ----------- 2. 10.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that initially when the F.I.R. was registered, four persons were named. They are Shankar Yadav, Sanjay Yadav, Gita Devi and Nunu Yadav. The case was registered under Sections 363 and 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is stated that Shankar Yadav and Sanjay Yadav are brothers of the petitioner whereas Gita Devi and Nunu Yadav are mother and father respectively of the petitioner. From order dated 6.7.2011 by which the bail of the petitioner has been rejected by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Supaul, it transpires that the main allegation is against Shankar Yadav with whom the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the victim was having affair from before. He also submits that it is not a case of kidnapping or abduction but of elopement. The maximum which could come in course of investigation is that the petitioner was in constant contact with his brother Shankar Yadav on telephone. Taking into consideration the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner, namely, Laxman Yadav, who is not named in the 2 F.I.R., be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 25 of 2011. Sanjeet (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)