IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 31ST MARCH 2011 / 10TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 10302 of 2011(K) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. SREELAKSHMI L.S.CARMEL GIRLS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,TRIVANDRUM,REP.BY HER FATHER V.SASIKUMAR. 2. APARNA.S,CARMEL GIRLS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,TRIVANDRUM,REP.BY HER FATHER SYAMDAS. 3. MARINA ELAS PAUL,CARMEL GIRLS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,TRIVANDRUM,REP.BY HER FATHER POLY P.JOHN 4. MANEESHA GURUDAS,CARMEL GIRLS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,TRIVANDRUM,REP.BY HER FATHER K.GURUDAS. 5. VINEETHA CATHERINE LESLY, CARMEL GIRLS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, TRIVANDRUM,REP.BY HER MOITHER P.MANOHARI. 6. GAYATHRI SURESH,CARMEL GIRLS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,TRIVANDRUM,REP.BY HER FATHER SURESH.P.S 7. REEMSA.C.M,CARMEL GIRLS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,TRIVANDRUM,REP.BY HER FATHER C.A.MOHAMMED SALIM. 8. DIYA.S.NAIR,CARMEL GIRLS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,TRIVANDRUM,REP.BY HER FATHER R.CHANDRAN NAIR. 9. KRISHNA.V.RAJEEV,CARMEL GIRLS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,TRIVANDRUM,REP.BY HER FATHER RAJEEV RAJAGOPAL 10. ASWATHY.S.CARMEL GGIRLS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,TRIVANDRUM,REP.BY HER FATHER KESAVAN POTTY. BY ADV. SRI.M.POLY MATHAI WP(C).No. 10302 of 2011(K) RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE PRINCIPAL,CARMEL GIRLS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,TRIVANDRUM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV. MR. P.N. SANTHOSH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. W.P.(C) No. 10302 OF 2011 ......................................................................... Dated this the 31st March, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioners, who were participants in the event 'Thiruvathira' in the State School Youth Festival held recently at Kottayam have come up with the grievance that, though they could not perform the event when their name was called because of some defect in the announcement system, subsequently when they approached the first respondent, permission was granted and accordingly they performed the event, in which, according to the petitioners, they were given 'A' Grade as well. But since the result was subsequently withheld, the petitioners are now before this Court seeking for redressal of their grievance as projected in Ext.P2 representation, which is pending consideration before the first respondent. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances, the first W.P.(C) No. 10302 OF 2011 2 respondent is directed to consider Ext.P2 and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law, if orders are still to be passed and communicate the outcome to the petitioners, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the first respondent for further steps. The Writ Petition is disposed of. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk