IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8055 of 2011 JAGDISH PUJHAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 24.03.2011. Heard. Undisputedly, the petitioner is not named in the FIR of the case which is under various Sections of the IPC, the Arms Act and Explosive Substances Act besides Section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act and other Sections of 10, 11 and 13 of the U.A.P.Act. The learned court below has pointed out three paragraphs indicating the complicity of the petitioner but what was the overt-act attributable to him does not appear noted down by the court below. In fact, the allegations appear generally made and no one appears caught at the spot, considering which, let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in Chakai P.S.Case No.20 of 2010. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha,J.)