IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-23548 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: August 26, 2010 M/s Shristi Marketing Services and others …..Petitioners versus State of UT and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr.Mandeep Sodhi, Advocate for the petitioner s .. RAJAN GUPTA, J.: (Oral) This is a petition under section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of complaint filed against the petitioners under section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the cheque in question was, infact, handed over to complainant as security. The same was presented before the bank and dishonoured. On this ground, the complaint in question deserves to be quashed. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Only factual grounds have been agitated for the purpose of seeking quashing of complaint. I am of the considered view that all these questions can only be gone into by the trial court after some evidence is led before it. The petition is, thus, devoid of merit and is hereby dismissed. August 26, 2010 ( RAJAN GUPTA ) pc JUDGE