1 ca 9318.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9318 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2936 OF 2009 Jijabai d/o Premraj Chavan .. Applicant Versus 1. Satpuda Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Dhule and others .. Respondents Shri Milind Patil, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri M. C. Jain, Advocate for Respondents. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 12TH AUGUST, 2011. PER COURT : . The present civil application is filed for vacating interim relief or in the alternative for fixing the petition for final hearing. 2. Shri Patil, the learned counsel for the applicant submits that this Court earlier had only granted stay to the backwages and no stay was granted to the reinstatement, as present applicant was already reinstated. But subsequent to the passing of the order by this Court, the applicant is again terminated from 2 ca 9318.11 the service which she has now challenged before the School Tribunal. The stay to the backwages was granted earlier as the present applicant was reinstated and she would be getting salary. Now in view of the changed circumstances, the applicant prays that the non applicants be directed to deposit the backwages by vacating the order of interim relief passed on 24th June, 2009. 3. It is also submitted that earlier an application was filed and at that time the Court had fixed the writ petition for final hearing, but the same could not reach. 4. Taking into account the above facts, it would be appropriate to fix the writ petition for final hearing at an earlier date. 5. Fix the writ petition for final hearing in the week commencing from 17th October, 2011. If in case the writ petition cannot be heard as fixed, liberty to the applicant to renew her prayer of vacating the interim relief made in the present application. The civil application is disposed of. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/Aug. 11