IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.16 of 2010 MANGILAL SHARMA & ANR. Versus SHYAMA DEVI & ORS. ----------- 04/ 14.05.2010 I.A. No. 825 of 2010 has been filed on behalf of the petitioners for condoning the delay in filing of the civil review petition. Although there is a long delay of about a decade but considering the averments made by learned counsel for the petitioners and the statements made in the interlocutory application, it transpires that it is necessary to decide this case on merits. Accordingly, the aforesaid interlocutory application is allowed and the delay in filing of this civil review petition is condoned. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. This civil review petition has been filed for partial review of order dated 18.08.1999 passed by a Bench of this Court in Civil Revision No. 1954 of 1997 with respect to the observations made in the middle of penultimate paragraph of that order `that there is nothing to show that the father and the sons i.e. the substituted plaintiffs were separate inter se . From the averments made by learned counsel for the petitioners and the materials on record, this Court does not find any error apparent on the face of the record nor does it find any fresh material to take a different view Hence, no case for review is made out and, accordingly, this civil review petition is dismissed. MPS/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )