IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1570 of 2008 SANTOSH KUMAR BHAGAT & ORS Versus G.M,NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAIL. ----------- 2. 16.9.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioners. In the opinion of this Court the impugned order does not suffer any jurisdictional error. The court below has rightly rejected the prayer of the plaintiff petitioner for adducing of additional evidences at the stage of arguments in the suit by taking into consideration that such document, which was sought to be now adduced in evidence by the plaintiffs petitioners at the stage of argument was well within their knowledge and in fact when the defendant in his written statement had clearly denied service of any such notice under section 80 C.P.C. it was the duty of the petitioners to bring document into evidence at the earliest stage. That having been not done by the plaintiff petitioner at appropriate stage this Court would not interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/