aF.AWWMWV v. x x CU O HATISGARH t ILASPUR Wnt Petltlon (S) No 2879 of 2009 Smt. Indu Meshram (Vaidya), W/ o Shn’ Hitesh Vers su - Panchayat and $ural Welfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan, antralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 1 oner .Vaidya, aged about 28 years, R/o Santqshi Nagar, Khamtarai, District Raipur (C.G.) ‘ 5 Réspondmlts 1 State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretaxy, , 2. State Level Hi Power Caste Scrutiny Committee, throrgh Director, High Power Caste Scrutiny Commlttee Umversityr Campus, Ra1pur, Dlstmct Ralpur (C G) 3. ' Chlef Executwe Omcer Janpad Panchayat Tilda, Ralpur (C G‘) (Writ Penuon Under Article 226 of the Constitution (SB Hon’ble Shn Satlsh K Agmhotn J ) § ~ Shri Anoop' Majumdar, Advocate for the Qpetitioner. ‘ Shn' Yashwant Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate General W1th hn' Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the reispondents No. l and 2. \ ORD E Rwan- (Passed on this 22nd day of June, 2009) ' Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General; appearing for the respondents No. 1 and 2/ State submits that if the petitioner Ees an application‘for verification of his caste 1n :the given (proforma‘along with required documents,”t_he Castei Scrutiny Committee shall consider the case of the petitioner andé f pass appropriate order within a period of four weeks from the date of presentation of the representation. Shli Anoop Majumdar, learned counsel appearing for the ‘ petitioner submits that the respondents] State may be directed to make the profgma application, available to the petitioner However havmg regaid to the facts situation of the case, as the Caste Scrutiny Committee has undertaken to decide the: t . u HIGH ORT F CHT B S of Indla) irepmsentation within a pen'od of f0 ! tpresentatjon of the Same, it may b( stcps shall'be taken for a pEIiod of fme weeks. {it is ordered, accordingly. 111 View of the foregoing, the writ petitLion is disposed of. No ord as t co. ' E o sts f d f ur weeks rom the ate o : eriv directed that no coce i i ,v i I i @ er 1