IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 19778 of 1995 Between: 1 Mrs. Nusrath Jahan Ara W/o Mr.Mohd.Afzal R/o H.NO.11-6-829, Red Hills Hyderabad 2 Mrs.Sabiha Parveen W/o Mr.Mohd.Azam R/o H.NO.10-2-318/1/81/6, Mallepally Hyderabad 3 Dr.Mrs. Fareesa, W/o Dr.Mohd.Jahangir R/o H.NO.16-11-100/3, Moosarambagh Hyderabad ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Minicipal Corporation of Hyderabad represented by the Deputy Commissioner Circle No.IV, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Khairatabad, HYDERABAD 2 The Assistant City Planner Circle No.IV, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Khairatabad HYDERABAD .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction restraining the respondents, their men, their servants and subordinates from interfering with the construction of the building including the cellar portion and from seeking to demolish the constructions already made in the premises bearing No. 10-2-299/F/A, situated at Mallepally, Hyderabad, declaring that the threatened demolition of the constructions already made on the said premises are illegal and invalid and declaring the interference by the respondents, their men, servants and subordinates with the constructions including the cellar portion on the said premises bearing M.C.H.NO.10-2-299/F/A is illegal, null and void. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.T.SESHAGIRI RAO (not present) Counsel for the Respondent No1 and 2: MR.C.R.PRATAP REDDY (SC MCH, CIRCLE 3-5) The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.19778 of 1995 ORDER: When the matter is came up for filing counter-affidavit on 05.11.2004, none appears for the petitioners. Therefore, the matter was posted to today under the caption “For Dismissal”. Even today also, none appears for the petitioner and no representation is made on their behalf. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for default. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA,J Date: 10th November, 2004. Ksn ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Deputy Commissioner, Minicipal Corporation of Hyderabad Circle No.IV, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Khairatabad, HYDERABAD. 2 The Assistant City Planner Circle No.IV, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Khairatabad HYDERABAD 3. Two C.D. copies