^j&^ ,£ c^ BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHA1TISGARH) W.P. (Cr) No./lfl ^^ of 2011 PETITIONERS .<^^ .•*V-^{ ^l V<»^ I" ^''&^ rj°^ ..••''' .'0'^ ..^' ^•''.^J^'-"' ^yw' v<^-'"" /-<A, RESPONDENTS 1. Fatte Das S/o Alkoo Deharey, aged 38 years, Caste-Satnanii, 2. Rukhmani Bai W/o Fatte Das, aged 35 years, Both's Occupation - Labourer and Agriculturist, Both are R/o Village-Mulmula, Post- Pendri-Tarai, P.S. & Tahsil Bemetara, Distt; Durg (C.G.) VERSUS ^ ./ 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through-Secretary, Departnient of Honie Affairs, JVEaritralya D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Superintendent of Police, Durg Distt. Durg (C.G.) 3. Station House Officer, Police Station Beinetara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 4. Station House Officer, P.S.- Nawagarh, Distt. Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA TO ISSUE JWRIT OF CERTIORARY/ry^^n^irnA^, -J -•^s$-, '^fy/^ ^° H1GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRJT PETITIQN (Cr.) No. 4122 of2011 PETITIONERS RESPONDENT8 Fatte Das & Another. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Otfiers. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITVriON OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotn, J. Present: Shri Sudhir Verma, Advocate forthe petitioners. Sltri V.V.S.Moorthy, Deputy Advocate General forthe State/ respondents. ORDERrORAL) (Passed on 29th day ofJuly, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for fhe petitioners, on instmctions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition witihi liberty t6 take recourse to appropriate statutory fomm fhat may be available to the petitioner under fhe provisions of fhe Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. 2. Leamed counsel appeating for ofher side has no objection. 3. It is ordered accordingly. 4. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as witiidrawn with the aforestated liberty, ifso advised- __ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge Amit