1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 45. CA/5827/2007 In FAST/8264/2007 WITH CA/5828/2007 In FAST/8264/2007 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. S.V.Warad, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. D.R.Jayabhar, Adv., for respondent nos. 2 to 4. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 8/1/2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard Mr. S.V.Warad, Counsel for the appellant Tata Motors Ltd. and Mr.D.R.Jayabhar, Counsel, for respondent nos. 2 to 4/ original claimants. 2. There is delay of 421 days in causing to file the appeal, seeking to challenge the order passed by the Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmednagar, in MACP No.1078/1995, arising out of the accident. 2 3. The delay is properly explained by the appellant. It is not intentional. Substantial rights of the appellant are involved as liability is saddled against the appellant. Consequently, delay of 421 days is condoned. Application allowed. 4. By earlier order dt.8th Dec., 2009, the appellant was directed to deposit Rs.5.00 lacs within eight weeks from the date of the order i.e. 8th Dec.,2009. Mr.Warad accepts to comply the mandate of earlier directions in stipulated time. 5. The appeal will be finally heard at admission stage. S.O. to 8th Feb.,2010. Civil Applications for delay condonation and stay petition disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/5827-07cagr