BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Tenth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.11477 of 2011 P.SARAVANAN ... PETITIONER/1ST ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TENKASI POLICE STATION TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT CR.NO.850/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. D.VENKATESH Advocate For Respondent :Mr.K.S.DURAIPANDI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is the first accused in Crime No.850 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 323, 341, 307, 506(ii) & 379 (NP) of the Indian Penal Code. He apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.According to the case of prosecution, in a wordy quarrel, it is alleged that the petitioner and other accused attacked the de-facto complainant. It is fruther alleged that in the said occurrence a gold chain belonging to the de-facto complainant was found missing. On this allegation, the present case has been registered. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has got nothing to do with the alleged offence. He would further submit that the co-accused by name, Marimuthu, had already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Crl.OP(MD)No.11714 of 2011 on 06.09.2011 . 4.I have considered the above submissions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.The petitioner also stands in the same footing as that of the other accused, who has been granted aniticipatory bail. Though, it is alleged that there are previous cases, which is only either minor in nature or relating to matrimonial dispute, since the other accused, who stands in the same footing, have been granted anticipatory bail, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner , but with conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m. without fail until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.PC. Scrupulously. sd/- 10/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TENKASI 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDCIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TENKASI POLICE STATION TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S. D.VENKATESH Advocate SR.No.34976 rl/6c – 10.10.2011 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11477 of 2011 Date :10/10/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/