(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. REVIEW APPLICATION NO. ........... OF 2009 (Stamp No. 9775/2009) (In Writ Petition No. 7593 of 2008) 1. Shri Ashok s/o. Sadashiv Gaikwad, Age : 45 years, Occupation : Agriculture, President, Village Water Supply and Hygiene Committee, village : Wadgaon Ambe, Taluka : Pachora, Dist. Jalgaon. 2. Sau. Sangita w/o. Pravin Chavan, Age : 35 years, Occupation : Household, Secretary, Village Water Supply and Hygilene Committee, village Wadgaon Ambe, Taluka : Pachora, Dist. Jalgaon. .. Applicants. versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32. 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon, Dist. Jalgaon. 3. The Deputy Chief Executive Officer (Village Panchayats), Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon, Dist. Jalgaon. 4. The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Pachora, Dist. Jalgaon. (2) 5. The Executive Engineer, Village Water Supply Department, Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon, Dist. Jalgaon. 6. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Zilla Parishad, Village Water Supply Department, Sub-Division, Pachora, at Pachora, Dist. Jalgaon. .. Respondents. .................. Mr. D.B. Thoke, Advocate, for the applicants. Mr. P.M. Shinde, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.1. Mr. V.S. Yadav, Advocate, instructed by Mr. M.K. Goyanka, Advocate, for respondent nos.2 to 6. .................. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & S.P. DAVARE, JJ. DATE : 25TH JUNE 2009. COURT’S ORDER : 1. The Review Application taken up for hearing. Office to register it as Review Application. 2. By way of present application, the applicants (original petitioners) have sought review of the order dated 20th March 2009 passed in Writ Petition No. 7593 of 2008. (3) 3. Mr. D.B. Thoke, learned Counsel appearing for the applicants (original petitioners), submits that this court has disposed of the petition on the basis of the letter dated 29th February 2009. He submits that in the said letter, it has been stated that an enquiry was conducted. However, as a matter of fact, the enquiry was not conducted and as such, an error, apparent on the face of record, has been occurred while passed the order under review. 4. Perusal of the order would reveal that this court has taken into consideration that aspect of the letter dated 29th February 2009, addressed by the Executive Engineer, Rural Water Supply Department, Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon, to the Divisional Commissioner, Nashik Division, Nashik, that the funds would be released after the Grampanchayat meeting is convened. Only taking into consideration this aspect of the letter, further directions were issued by this court. 5. In that view of the matter, no error, apparent on the fact of record, is noticed so as to invoke review jurisdiction. 6. The Review Application is, therefore, dismissed. ( S.P. DAVARE ) ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE ...................... bgp/rast9775