CL^ 1 ^-e=> BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURfC.G.y W.P. fSl No. L/£g0 /2009 PETITIONER RESPQNDENTS xA<%^ ^^ ....-",^--"9->^" ^y. ^-•' yf- '?!' Smt. Nivedika Lal, W/o. Arvind Kumar Lal, aged about 49 years, Assistant Teacher, Government Primary Nagarkohara, Block- Disfrict Rajnandgaon School Chhuriya, (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Th roug h; Secretary Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) , ^.',Block Education Officer Block.- Chhuriya - District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) II? Af. WRITPETITION U/A2260F THE CONSTITUTION QFINDIA Ksi• HI6H COURT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BILASPUR jHon'ble Mr. Justice Prltiaker Diwakerj Writ Petition (S) No. 4680/2009 ^^- PETITIONER RBSPONDENTS Smt. Nivedika Lal Versus State of Chhattisgarh 85 Others Shri Avinash Chand Sahu, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Amrito Das, P.L. for the State. WRTT PETITION UHDER ARTICLB 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF mpiA ORDER 125.8.20091 With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally. The petitioner is aggrieved by the non-payment of two advance increments for having^obtainedD.Ed Examination certificate at-hsr own expenses in the year1983. Coynsel for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the fact and question of law involved in the present case are the same to that of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another reported in {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 3.4.2006. Subsequently, in Writ Petition No. (S) 4130/2005 in the matter of (Gopesh Kumar Verma Vs. The State Govt. of Chhatfisgarh 8s Anotherj and other connected matters, decided by this Court on 15.12.2006, pursuant to the memo dated 24.12.1998, issued by the - Secretary, Board of Secoadary Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Diploina in Education Examination, it was clarified that the nomenclature of the Basic Training Institute i.e. BTI has been changed and renamed as Diploma in Education i.e. D.Ed. Accordingly, tbe D.Ed. certificate holders are also covered by the decision in W.P.(S) No. 4130/2005 (supra). -o ||fl!s|ipl|t|i '^7^S^SS5fB5E^^ "" u. •t»f o. /' agpnt jceiF'^i'»a5(UOl-la -/PS -,;, ,^ •8isoo oi se japjo of^ •^ou jo siusmsjom soueApB OM^ pred usaq seq sqg jsqiaqM JsqfJnj pire 666T'e'T PUB 866T'5I'.1'S P3feP JBinoJio sqi jsd SB sssusdxs UMO jsq •(B SIBOIJIIJSO uoi^murexs 'ps'Q psjinbo^ s^q jauoppsd sqi j9q^sqM 01 SB S^OBJ sqi jo uop'BogusA o^ ^oafqns (sjdns) feApjeqg jeujn^i ^UBMqs^^J0 3SBO 3W UI psss'ed jspjo sqi jo suuat u; p3MO{JB SI UORpSd 1UM 3l{} 'Afguipjooov