mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4626 of 2008 Sudeep Manoharlal Tandon .. Petitioner versus Ninu Shivdas Khanna .. Respondent ... Mr.Y.S. Jehagirdar, Sr.Counsel with Mr.P.S.Dani for the petitioner. Mr.R.V.Govilkar for the respondent. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J DATED : 7th August 2008 P.C.: 1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. It is not in dispute that the Sub-Divisional Officer, Panvel Division by an order dated 18th May 2004 recognised the right of the opposite party to use the disputed access for the purposes stated therein. So long as the respondent abides by the said order, the petitioner will not have any difficulty or objection. Needless to observe that if the respondent intends to use the disputed access in a manner other than the one provided by Sub-divisional Officer in his order dated 18th May 2004 shall take prior permission in that behalf from the concerned authority under due intimation to the petitioner who are the owners of the said land. 3. Needless to observe that both parties will be bound by the order of the Sub-divisional Officer dated 18th May 2004 unless it is set aside or modified by the appropriate authority in accordance with law. This arrangement will be an interim arrangement without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties. All questions in the pending proceedings have to be addressed on its own merits in accordance with law. 4. Petition disposed off accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)