IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Writ Petition No. 697 of 2010 Date of decision: April 22, 2010 Krishan Lal .. Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. H.P.S. Ishar, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N. Jindal, J Learned counsel has stated that the detenues as mentioned in para No.3 of the petition want to leave the brick kiln but the respondent No.5/owner is not allowing them to leave the brick kiln. In these circumstances, the respondent No.5 is directed not to interfere in their movements and if there is any dispute with regard to payment of money, he may have the remedy as provided under the law. In case, the respondent No.5 creates obstructions, then they may approach Station House Officer, P.S. Malot, District Malot – respondent No.4. Disposed of accordingly. April 22, 2010 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge