,__^ XI-HC—78 3'wT ^|^|<7i><4, •^Tn'y'Ko, ts)<7'il'y^< ^ 'qm^TT *^l|cb "^ 200 3H^5T T|?RF (4c<?lfl<<^) 37T^?T^ f<rl[ch 1cf^T 'STI^T $t>^IC?) ^Rnw^f^T ^n^r M.4i Appellaat RBSPONDBNTS 4)N(d^r1 "WRff ^f.fe^ <Pn«cK ^T 3TRPT'STT^T ;QNo. 670 of 2007 Yasoda Bai, aged about 58 years, widow of late Raoijhool Gond, resident of village Salhekapa, Tahsil kargikala, District BUaspur (C.G) Versus Rajkumar alias Raju Dubey, aged about 35 years, s/o N.P.Dubey, r/o Mankdika Ghat Qtar.No. 10/2003, P.S. Chowk Varaiiasi, Distt Baaaras, U,P. Presently residiag Firaagipara Kota, P.S. and TahsU Kota, Distt. BUaspur (C.G) - Drfser of the Tractor2Vo.KP 12/7519 Saadeep Tomar, aged about 21 years, son of late Satyaveer Siagh Toinar Sumit Tor son of late Satyaveer Siagh Tomar, aged about 18 years Respondents 2 & 2A are the residents of Qrr.No.C-3/146, Janakpuri, New Delhi, U.P. - Registered Oumers of Trewbor N9.U.P. 12/7519 The Orieutal Insuraace Compaay Ltd., through the Braach Maaager, 9 Communily Centre Mayapuri Phase - 1, through fhe Divisional Maaager, Oriental Insurance Company Limited, m front of high Court of C. G. Bilaspur (C. G) Insurer of the Treictor JVO.CP12/75I9) £:—78 3^€T^ll-i^l^, ^xfl^^KS, [s|<7'>l^^< *<INdl *NI<*» . , ..........M.:.hcc).......i..7.c?/. ^2007 3Ti^T^ fqrl|ch ^sn 3TT^T 9n^i<=n h1^^. gn^TTWR (4€'^a<<g) chl^td^l^ ^RF^ff ^ftcst <fa<^i< ^r^fRm^l^T Misc. Appeal u/s t73 ofthe Motor Vehlcles Act. 1988 Appearance: Miss. Deepali G^osh, counsel for the appeUaat. D.B: Hon>ble Shri Jtistice L.C. Bhadoo fls Hon^ble Sliri 4ustice Suail Kumar Siaha, J»J ORAL ORDER JP^.08.2007) L.C.Bhadoo, Heard on admisstion. The claimant Ya^oda has preferred this appeal u/s 173 of fhe Motor Vehicles J dated 27.2.2007 passe< (F.T.C) Bilaspiir, ia \ct 1988 for enhaacement of fhe award 1 by VIII Motor Accident Claims Tribunal t;laim case No.34/2005 ffled on 10th January 2005, where^y the learaed Tribunal has awarded rs.32,000/- as the amc^unt of coinpensation alongwifh iaterest @ 8% p.m. from the dajte ofapplication and ifthe award is not paid within a period of|bwo monfhs fhen the mterest shall be at fhe rate of 10%. A perusal of fhe Award, it has been mi< stated that she sustaic also sustamed iajuries used to eara Rs.80/- Award shows that in Para 46 of the intioned fhat fhe clamiaat Yasoda has ed fractiire m the right fhigh bone and |on the left aad right haad elbows aad she remamed m hospit^l for 15 days. She also stated fhat she per day aad disclosed her age as 58 years. She claimed Rs|7,40,000/-, but she has not examiaed aay medical speciaMst jm order to establish the fracture aad other iajuries snstain^A hy hpr^ tTie.rp-fnrp, in a 1iimp,^um the XI-HC—78 3^Ef ^|A||0^, ^Tfl^^Ko, [s|(^l^^< 31T^?r ?FT'f^ri^ 1cT8Tf 'STT^T 5h^li<^ t. ^ V ^fi\ ^; n^ c- ^70 ^l^dl *NI<h ••••"—-••"••-""-""""•"•""•"""•""•^ 200 7 3TT^?T ^i^F (llc<^<^) '^nw^f^T ^Ti^r ^>- iks. reiaafcaed tfafe tribunal has awarded ditriiig which, she of her earaiag as also Siace fhe claunaat to estabUsh fhat she injuiy on the nght aa^ evidence to substaatiatel labour, therefore, tafcm^ was earaiag as a daily Rs.32,000/- Therefore, lookmg] and the evidence considered opinion Rs.32,000/- awarded reasonable, which is notj The appeal beiag and it is hereby disixiiss€|d Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge <=bl^f<y1^<1 ^l*1<3lf ^fe^ <f^^l< ^ 3tRPT'STT^T ^.32,000/- on accoiint of the period ia hospital aad she was deprived niedical expenses, paia aad sufifering. has not adduced the medical evidence s^stained fracture or she sustamed aiiy left haad elbows nor fhere is aay her inedical claioi and fhe claimaat is iato account the amount which she 7ager, the Tnbunal has awarded ia all to fhe totaUty of the circiimstances addi^ced by the clauaaat, we are of the fhe compensation amount of py fhe tdbunal is just, fair aad |on lower side ia aay maaner. 4evoid of merit is liable to be dismissed Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge tiiiat 1;1^1^1- fff ffll ^l •\