IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 4015 of 2011 Decided on: 07.07.2011 Anita Kaushal …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner: Mr. Yogesh Kumar Chandel, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Vivek Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General, with Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, learned Deputy Advocate General for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. Ashwani Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No. 3. Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral) The petitioner by means of this petition has challenged the order dated 30.05.2011, whereby respondent No. 3, who was under transfer to GSSS Sanoura, has been ordered to be adjusted at GSSS Domehar in place of the petitioner and petitioner, in turn, has been transferred to Sanoura in District Sirmaur. 1 Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes. -: 2 :- 2. This Court had summoned the record. On perusal of the record, it is found that respondent No. 3, after she was ordered to be transferred to Sanoura, made a representation to the Hon'ble Chief Minister of the State requesting that she may be adjusted at some other place, preferably Domehar. Hon'ble Chief Minister is the Administrative Head of the State and he took a decision to accept the representation of respondent No. 3. This is totally an administrative function and unless allegations of mala fides are alleged, this Court cannot sit in judgment over the administrative decisions of the State Government. 3. The petitioner has already spent two years five months at Domehar and has no vested right to continue there. However, Mr. Yogesh Kumar Chandel, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner is also suffering a hardship since her husband is posted at Shimla and her children are studying in Solan and if she is posted in Sirmaur, she will not be able to look after her husband and children. 4. Keeping in view these facts, it is directed that in case the petitioner makes a representation to the Principal Secretary (Education) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh within one week from today, the same shall be considered by the Principal Secretary (Education) to the Government of -: 3 :- Himachal Pradesh and a decision thereon be taken within three weeks thereafter. 5. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Copy Dasti. (Deepak Gupta) Judge July 7, 2011 (rajni)