6/? m; 3mm? v lN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (c.G) w.P. (S) No. sggix OF 2010 //" Pramod Kumar Mandavi, aged about 18 years, S/o Late Shri Balram Mandavi, R/o Village & Post Jepra, Tahsil Charama, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) PETITIONER VERSUS K RESPONDENTS :1. rState of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Forest Department, D.K.VS. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Principle Chief Conservator of Forest, Aranya Bhawan, Medical College Road, Raipur (C.G.) Divisional Forest Officer, Kanker Kanker Division,Kanker Distt. (C.G.) 4‘I The Coue‘ctor, Kanker (C.G.) Conservator of Forest , Kanker Circle, Kanker (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER As mentioned in the cause title. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS As mentioned in the cause title. HGH COURT OF CHHATTE$§ARH : BILAé’BPUR KNEW F)FT§'T1(”)N {'R\ NO §RS§ ("JF ?{HH §’—’ET§TiQi\EER Framoa‘ Kumar Mandavi Varsus RESPONEENTS Stake of Chhaiiisgarh & Qéhers {v"‘£rii Peiition under Ariiz33e 226 af the Comtitutign of ind§a) Singie Bench : Hon’bie Shri $aii$h K. Agnihotri, J‘ Pfesent :— SM DNPragapati Advocaie farthe petiiioner. Shri P‘KBhaduré, Panaé Laawyeir f0? {he Siatei fesgaandems. QRDER (GRAD, {Pasaed or; {39” day 3f May. 2G1 1) 1. Learned ceunse§ apiaearmg a‘or “me getitmner $aek$ permisSicn a? ihés Sour? it) wéihdyaw this peiiiign w§ih liberty $0 pug'sue me z‘egafesemaiam agndMQ mire %he authoriiies concerned. 2. Leamed gownse§ aa§e3¥im§ far ihe gkatg/res§on£ienis ssu£3mi€5 ma? thwgh m9 éecisian has akeady bean' iaken. hcwever: anti ihe $eccmd éhcugh": wawe; be gi‘dag i0. me repmwntation $ame shaié be cangidered and decided, in ascenjarica mm Eaw. 3 Assamingw, tha wa'ié geiii rm is @iamigsed a3 wéihdz’awn WEEh ihe w \ aforeg‘iaied Gb$evva§0n \ Sd/- " Satish K.Agnihotri Judge Ashok