IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.941 of 2009 Date of Decision: October 21, 2009 Kiranjit Singh Tiwana & Others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & Others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. D.S. Patwalia, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondents. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) The petitioners, in this petition, pray for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent Nos.2 and 3 to forward the cases of the petitioners to respondent No.4 for consideration, for recruitment to Punjab Civil Services (Executive Branch) from Register-I (Tehsildar, Naib Tehsildar) for recruitment process 2007 in pursuance to Requisition/ Memo dated 7.11.2008 (Annexure P-6). Learned counsel for the respondent- CWP No.941 of 2009 [2] State contends that Annexure P-6 is no more relevant, in so much as, new criteria has been framed. The process for nomination to Punjab Civil Services (Executive Branch) would be done according to new criteria. In view of the statement of learned counsel for the respondents, this petition is disposed of. The petitioners would be at liberty to claim nomination under the new criteria. (AJAI LAMBA) October 21, 2009 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?