?t: ^^^:^^ IN THE mpH COURT OF RJDICATURE ATBILASPUR (C.G.) WRITPETITION (C)NO. ^/ ^ /2007 PETITIONERS 1 Kamal kishorejain s/o ShriMohan jain, aged about 40 years, resident ofVillage Saja, Tahsil Saja, District Durg (GG). f^ ^Z.. I ''..'<;' ^.!-:"...« late champa laljain aged about 49 • '^'•{J^' ••• years, resident of Village Saja, ?"si^\<^ .··-'.vi*„^.'···' ^o ^ ^:^ ^?u' y Tahsil Saja, District Durg (CG). ^.Ramji prasad Shukla S/oC^tidu prasad Shukla aged about 6Sr/o Village Saja Tahsil SAJA DISTRICTDURG VERSUS RESPONDENTS r* State ofChhattisgarh Through Secretary Public Works Department & Administration D.K.S. Bhavan Raipur (C.G.) Sub Divisional OfBcer ^'^. ff[iy \ py%PubUc Work Department a^ ifaV^i^*^ n-'- n--i- T^---'-'-—-in-* ff&'1 c^- ^" Saja Sub Divisional Saja Distt. Durg (C.G.) Executive Engineer Public Work Department Bemetara ,Division Bemetara Distt. Durg --4 Sub Divisional OfBcer Saja Distt. Durg 5. Nagar Panchayat, Saja, through its President, Nagar Panchayat Saja, District Durg (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 'S^t'^Vffv^ ^•V'lS, hv\W^< IWTRT^WSR-- •"••••••••••••'-^—^ 200.^- atl^T'T^? (1pf3^?) 311^1 'W ft-li* ^T«ff3TT^T a>*ii<^ ?^TOR ^ft?( SiI^I (S.B: Hon'Me Shri Satish K. Agnihotti, J.) 05.08.2010 Smt. Renu Kochar, Advocate Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyl' Shri Y.S. Thakur, Advoca(e Panchayat, Saja. (W.P. (C) Nos. 4790, 5143, 5; With the consent of learneU petitions are heard finally. Order passed separately. ^iNwiN tiprcfl'if fyzt ^si^R ^affitiisn^i for the petittoners. er for the State. for the respondent Nagar |43 & 5959 of 2007) counsel for the parties, the Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge yii<Tt^T^frT'^1!-?y, (rT--r<r-iT-i -•'- 1 ^ < f "t }oif) t,^o.ooo, ?--: HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WMT PETmON fC) No. 4790 of2007 PETmQNERS RESPONDEOT'S Santosh Devi & Another VERSUS ; State ofChhattisgarh & Others And o W.P. (C) Nos. 5143, 5343 & 5959 of2007 WEIT PETmON LNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONS-ITTUnON OF DsTDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satfsh K. Afflutwtri. J. Present: Ms. RenuKochara, Advocatefbrthepetitioners. !; Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer forthe State. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Advocate for the respondent Nagar Pan^iayat, saJa. , , ORDER (ORAL) (Passed oa 5"' day of August, 2010) Gowri W.P. (C) Nos. 4790, 5143, 5343 & 5959 of 2007, involve the same question oflaw and common facts and, as suA, Ihey are being disposed of by flus common order. Challenge in these bateh ofpetitions is that pursuant to the general notice published in Ifae news paper on 30//07/2007, the respondent Nagar Panchayat is proceedmg to demarcate the property and thereafter, danolish the structure in dispute. Shri Thakur, leamed counsel appearing for the req}ondent-Nagar Panchayat, fairly submits that pursuant to the notice, no steps have been initiated to demolish any strueture except demarcation for the purpose of widening ofroad. Leamed counsel fiuther submits that ifNagar Panchayat takes decision to demolish the structure ofthe petitioners, they would be afforded an opportunity ofhearing by issuing a show cause notice and after hearing their respective cases. In view of foregoing, according to the leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners, nothing survives in these petitioiis for adjudication. Aecordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge r"