IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI ANIL R. DAVE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 1698 of 2008 Between: Baddi Satyanarayana S/o.late Guruvulu, Hindu, R/o.Koppugundapalem(V) Rambilli(M) Visakhapatnam Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Dist Collector Visakhapatnam Dist Visakhapatnam. 2 The Thasildar Rambilli(M) Visakhapatnam Dist. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents for assigning the land in an extent of 0.02 cents situated in Koppugundapalem (V) Rambill (M) Visakhapatnam Dist which was earmarked by the ancestors of the petitioner for the benefit of the villagers particulars to the Carpenters Community without considering the representation dt.12-12-2007 of the petitioner is highly arbitrary, unjust illegal and violative of article 14 and 300(A) of the constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondents not to take any coercive steps in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MRP.RAJASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER Per Anil R. Dave, CJ The petitioner claims that the land in question belongs to his ancestors and by virtue of a will executed by one of his ancestors, the property has been given for community purpose and, yet, the Government authorities have granted the land in favour of some one. In pursuance of the notice issued by this Court, the learned Government Pleader has appeared and has submitted that the land in question has not been granted to any one and, therefore, the petition is absolutely premature. He has further submitted that the petitioner has already filed a suit - O.S.No.380 of 2007 in the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Yelamanchili on the subject matter of the petition and the said fact has not been stated in the petition. From the facts stated herein above, it is clear that the petition is premature and is liable to be dismissed as it suffers from the vice of suppressio veri also. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ 27th March, 2008 R. SUBHASH REDDY, J vtv