IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34158 of 2010 MANOJ RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 10.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Huge quantity of kerosene oil is recovered from premises owned by Laxman Pahalwan and half fill tanker and a motorcycle was also standing there. Laxman Pahalwan is said landlord while this petitioner is tenant when the recovery was made. Laxman Pahalwan disclosed that petitioner is tenant of the premises. Later by filing an affidavit, it is shown that he is deviating from his earlier statement, but witnesses in paras-14, 22 and 23 are there to state that petitioner was tenant of the premises for keeping his empty drums. One thing more goes against this petitioner that he is able to manage and tamper the co-accused that is why affidavit is filed on behalf of Laxman Pahalwan. Accordingly, prayer of petitioner for anticipatory bail stands rejected. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.)