-= : 1 : =- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITON NO.7802 OF 2005 WRIT PETITON NO.7802 OF 2005 WRIT PETITON NO.7802 OF 2005 Shri Pratap Keshav Khadake ..Petitioner. V/s. Hutatma Kisan Ahir Sahkari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.Amit Sale for petitioner. Mr.S.S.Pakale for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. DATED : 10TH APRIL, 2006. DATED : 10TH APRIL, 2006. DATED : 10TH APRIL, 2006. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner was appointed on probation by an order dated 11/11/1985 for a period of 6 months pursuant to the earlier order dated 3/11/1985; wherein it was made clear that after joining, a regular appointment order would be issued. . The petitioner did not complete the probation period to the satisfaction of the Management. It is, thus, clear that on failure of the petitioner to complete the probation period to the satisfaction of the -= : 2 : =- Management, it was well within the powers of the Management to terminate services of the probationer. That is how services of the petitioner came to be terminated. . In the above facts and circumstances of the case, no legal right could be said to have accrued in favour of the petitioner. In this background, if the impugned order is considered, no fault can be found with the order or the action taken by the Management - employer. In the result, petition is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. ********