IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1076 of 2009 1. Tarkeshwar Pandey, son of Late Harinandan Pandey. 2. Sheo Shankar Pandey, son of Late Harinandan Pandey 3. Ramashankar Pandey, son of Late Harinandan Pandey 4. Kunwar Pandey, son of Late Harinandan Pandey 5. Daroga Pandey, son of Late Barmeshwar Nath Pandey. 6. Sri Ganesh Pandey, son of Late Barmeshwar Nath Pandey. 7. Sri Bhagwan Pandey, son of Late Barmeshwar Nath Pandey. 8. Upendra Pandey, son of Sheo Shankar Pandey. 9. Ravindra Pandey, son of Sheo Shankar Pandey (All are residents of village-Deorhi, P.S.-Dawath, District- Rohtas) ………Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Krishna Pandey, son of Tilakdhari Pandey, resident of village-Deorhi, P.S.-Dawath, District- Rohtas. …Opposite Parties. ----------- 5. 18.11.2011 The second party-petitioners have preferred this revision application against the order dated 22.12.2008 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram in Cr. Appeal No.92/2008 by which the appeal has been dismissed affirming the order dated 10.09.2008 passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Bikramganj in Case No.1123/2007 by which the petitioners have been directed to furnish a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each for maintaining peace for one year in a proceeding under Section 107 Cr.P.C. 2 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that there is no material on the record to show that after passing the order dated 10.09.2008 by the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate, the petitioners have committed any overt act. The period of the bond has also expired. Mrs. I.B.Pandey, the learned counsel for the State could not controvert the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Since the period of bond has expired and there is no material on the record to show that the petitioners have committed any overt act after passing the order by the learned Magistrate. In this view of the matter, no coercive steps will be taken against the petitioners for filing the surety bonds as directed by the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate vide order dated 10.09.2008. In the result, this application stands disposed of. V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)