S.B. Civil Writ Pet. No. 4826/05 Mal Singh Vs. State of Raj. & Anr. Date of order : 22.2.2008 HON'BLE MR. MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, J. Mr. P.S. Rathore for the petitioner. Mr. S. Ladrecha, Govt. Counsel. The short controversy argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner is in regard to grant of appropriate benefit of pension. It is contended that the petitioner was given only a sum of Rs. 1702/- towards pension which is not as per rules. Learned counsel for the respondents referring to the reply para seven submits that pension of the petitioner would be revised to the extent of 50% of the basic pay of the petitioner in view of the Rule 296 of the Pension Rules. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that necessary direction in that regard be given. In view of the statement of fact in reply, since respondents have accepted for grant of pensionary benefit to the extent of 50% on basic salary, it is directed that petitioner's pensionary benefits should be revised in view of the statements of fact made in para seven of the reply and accordingly the petitioner may be extended revised benefit . The direction so issued aforesaid may be complied with within the period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the arrears should also be paid to the petitioner on account of revision of pension from the date from which the petitioner became eligible for revised pensionary benefit. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. (MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI), J. ns.