1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 42 OF 2008 Girish Chanaya Shetty & Anr. ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents. Mr. A.M. Saraogi for the Petitioners Mrs. S.D. Shinde, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and S.A. BOBDE, JJ. DATE: FEBRUARY 5, 2008. P.C.:- This is a petition seeking quashing of F.I.R. No. 461 of 2007. 2. We have gone through the F.I.R., which discloses, prima facie, commission of cognizable offences. We are sorry that the police has not done its job well, and for the last two months, the investigation has not been completed. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners stated before us that he wants this F.I.R. to be quashed, as the police had, on investigation, come to the conclusion that no case was made out against the accused; but this argument was made without any basis. He further submitted 2 that he was making this argument on the basis of an order passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1457 of 2007 pertaining to the same accused. We have gone through the order. At no place, the learned Sessions Judge has given a finding that the police had come to the conclusion that no case was made out against the accused. 4. Prayer (b) made in the petition seeking action against respondent No. 3 is based on the ground that investigation was started after it has been closed. We have not found any material that investigation in the case was closed at any stage. Therefore, this prayer can also not be granted. 5. As such, we do not find any merit in this petition. It is accordingly dismissed. 6. The police concerned is directed to complete the investigation within a period of two weeks. BILAL NAZKI, J. S.A. BOBDE, J.