r-4 ? ^^ ^i' ^~' CL^- 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION(C) N0. W? OF 2010 PETITIONER: Ku. Divya Gautam, Aged About- 25 Years, D/o- Shri S.P. Gautam, R/o- Aganpur, Chitrakot Road, Infront of Pollution Control Board, P.0. Dhrampura, Jagadalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS \<3.- o '.-•', ^M^ RESPONDENT(S): 1. State of Chhattisgarh through its Secretary departrrient of Anusuchit Jati Aywam Anusuchit ^ Janjati Kalyan Vibhag, ,.•• D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2.Jati Praman Patra Uccha Estariya Chhanbin Samiti, Adira Jati Anusandhan Aywam Prashikshan Sansthan, Through Its President, Pandit Dindayal Upadhyay Nagar, Sector- 4, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Assistant Director (Anusandhan), Adim Jati Anusandhan Awyam. Prashikshan Sansthan, Raipur(C.G-) „ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ,^.:^^*s^, <T1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER WRTT PETITIONfC) No^.77pf2Q10 Ku. Divya. Gautain. VERSUS ^ofChhattisgarl- WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONS'mTJTION OF INDIA RESPONDENTS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. SB: HoR'fele Shri Satish K. Agiuhotri, J. Pressnt; Shi-i Vinay Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Sliri Shashaak Tliakiir. Panel Latwer for the State. A3I1- (Passed on 27ttlday of July, 2010) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the application (Amiexure P/5) of the petitioner for verification of her social status ceslificate is pending consideration since June, 2009. As per the mandate of Supreme Court in Kumari Madiwri Patil cmd Another v. Addl. Commissioner, Tribal Devehpment and Othenf, the application has to be decided within a period not exceediag two montfas fi'om the date ofreceipt ofthe application, thus, the authorities mav be.directed to consider and decide the aforestated applicatioa, in accordance with law and pass appropriate order, as early as possible. Leanied counsel appearing for fhe State/respondents submits that if the apptication,. as atbrestated, is pending consideration, the saaie would be considered and decided in accordance with law, as eariy as possible, preferably withui a period of four weeks from ths date of receipt of a copy ofthis order. In view of flie above, according to leained couiisel appearing for the petitioner, nothing sun'ives for adjudication in tliis matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of Sd/- SATISH K. AGNIHOTM Judge •('ia94)6SCC241