1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Wri t Petition No.4833/2008 Ku . Smita d/o Narayan Bahurupi Vs. Mah. State Board of Technical Education and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Mr. A.S. Kilor, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kakde, AGP for respondent no.3. Coram : B.H. Marlapalle and A.H. Joshi, JJ. Dated : 14th November, 2008. Heard Mr. Kilor, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Though the Respondent-University in the earlier results declared had shown the petitioner's result as ATKT but the same has been subsequently corrected and the petitioner has failed as per the marks memo dated 24.7.2008. It is thus obvious that the University corrected the earlier mistake and so long as the petitioner has failed in the combined result of IIIrd and IVth Semesters, he cannot appear for the examination of Vth Semester. It is true that he was allowed to attend the classes for Vth Semester on the basis of earlier result as ATKT and the petitioner cannot take the benefit of the default on the part 2 of the University. Hence, the petitioner's prayer for directions to allow her in the Vth Semester examination is unsustainable. The petition is, therefore, rejected. JUDGE JUDGE Ambulkar.