IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6111 of 2010 PARAS YADAV . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 9.4.2010 KHAN Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case under section 302/34 of the Penal Code and section 3(x) of the SC/ST Act. The informant is the son of the deceased. It is alleged that on the date of occurrence his father, the deceased, was working for the petitioner at his house and due to some altercation for remuneration, the accused persons including the petitioner had killed his father by pouring hot water on his body. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no eye witness to the occurrence and the post mortem report shows only minor abrasion on the right side of his body which is not sufficient to cause of his death. In view of the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. His prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. However, if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail, the same would be disposed of on its own merit without being prejudice by the fact that he moved this court for anticipatory bail. (S.P.Singh,J)