:1: bgp bgp bgp IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL ORIGINAL ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX TAX TAX APPEAL NO.346 OF 2009 APPEAL NO.346 OF 2009 APPEAL NO.346 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs. M/s.MIRC Electronics Ltd. ..Respondent Mr.Dhananjay Athawale for Appellant. Mr.Atul Jasani for respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & :- V.C.DAGA & :- V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 17TH APRIL,2009 : 17TH APRIL,2009 : 17TH APRIL,2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned Counsel for parties. 2. Four questions are raised in this appeal contending it to be substantial questions of law. 3. So far as question Nos.(a) to (c) are concerned, the matter has been remanded back by the Tribunal after fresh consideration, since the order of the Tribunal taking the similar view in the earlier Assessment Year 2000-01 was taken by the Tribunal. However, the appeal preferred on these questions being Income Tax Appeal No.1112 of 2004 has not been admitted by this Court. In other words, all these three questions were rejected by this Court vide order dated 16th February, 2009 in the said appeal. All these questions can hardly be said to be substantial :2: questions of law wanting admission of the present appeal. 4. So far as question (d) is concerned, it does not arise from the impugned order. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)