’f'rHE'HON'BL HIH CUR OF CHymTTI'sGARiéi‘QWAT Bi‘L‘AsmJR. WRIT pETITION No. lgé /2002, Gulab Rai ?anjwani. S/o Shankar lal Panjwani a Aged about 30 years-i, R/o Main Road, Korba (CQGJ 1)., P ETI ’I‘I ONT-3R5 ,x Ashok Panjwani Vié‘ya, S/o Shankarlal panjwani, Aged about 38 year‘s: .Near Govt.HOSpital* ’Main Road, Korba (C.Ga ) . - Ver sus - // 1). Aate of Chhattisgarh, Through The 5ecretary, Department of Health and Family welfare, D.K.S.Building,Raipur(C,G)% R ES P ONDENTS State of Madhya Pradesh, Through The 5ecretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Vanabh Bhawan,Bho0a1(M.p)i‘ K The M.P.Board of kyurvedic and Unani System of Medicine and Naturopathy, BhOpal (M.\P) Through : The Registrar, Shyamala Hills, Bhopal (M.P) The Chhattisgarh Eoard of Ayur- vedic and Unani 5ystem of Medicine and Naturopathy, Raipur, Through: The Registrar, Raipur ( C.Ga). w WRIT PETITI ON UNDm ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTEON ’ OF INDIA ' '\ ~ _ CLEg‘Ji n y TG AéayELA§?UR / v‘ap’P ”E G OT X g Shri B'D.Guru, coun 61 for the petitioners Qhri Ranbir Singh, G. . for the State] Respondent No. 1 None for mspondents 0.2 and 3. ‘ ye are?” ' ‘Ms. Sharmila’Singha, Counsel for respondelg‘rtVNoA. 7 AS similar matters e been dlsposed of and cons1dermg the hunted natme of prayer ade at the time of hearmg, Winch 1s for a dHectlon to the respon ent No.3 to consider the question of registratiori of the petition rs in accordance with the rules, regulations and guidelines gbveming the deld, no useful puxpose _ will be served in keeping thi Writ petition pending, which on the ‘ prayer of leanied counsel r the parties, this ‘wn‘t petition is being disposed ofat the adm‘ sion stage. According to the peti oners they have acquired Vaidya 1 Visharad and Avurved Ra qualincau'on fmm Hindi Sahitya i ‘ § p Sammelan, Prayag Allahab and on the basis thereof, they-had 1 approached respondent No.‘ for issuance of a form so as to I enable them to apply for registration but the said respondent No 3 did not issue any form §w1th the result that they have not I ' i . XI-Hc—22 ‘ I W $&%&w W31 ma? W‘ I Wm n {*v‘t Tm $ arm gm m I T5; 1 1.2W2 XI-HC‘22 mam mmaf’g'a be.Cn able to get themsclves 1 therewith, the petitionexs hav In support of their cla on a decision of the M.P.High Jaln — Vs 7 > State 01 Chhattisgarh 85 Others), copi $3f1—‘Vrq3ném . /:> a;w egistered as Pharmacists. Aggrieved e approached this Court. m for registration, reliance is placed _ Com in Mia No.2s?/V1%990 (Sakhar ’ Madhya Pradesh‘ 8r, Others) and Khan 85 another “—‘Vs — State oi‘ P/ 13. In rebuttal, the Stat! es whereof are ahnexed as P/ 10 and I fSupreme Court in the case o: 2002 ALR. S.C.W. 2966. Hpwever, in View of the limited nature of the prayer made, ibis not 1 case. f the prayer made at the time of hearing, the Writ petit'on is disposed of by direcu'ng the respondent No.3 to issue appmpiiate forms to each petitioner, so as to enable them to apply for registration. it is made clear that the issuance of a form unde the direction of a Court is not to be construed as a direction ieqiuiring the said respondent to grant . E ‘ k“.- V I , . i has relied on the. judgment of the {State of Rajastan - 'Vs- 'Lata Arum, 1 hecessaiy to go into the merits of the Accortiingly, in View registration to the petitionersf. The question of their registration will have to be decided onimerits by the respondent No.3 in i t 7 w.P.No.558/ 200 1 (Zehiruna m 2009 Wang ... ‘F $W W0?! figv& WK mWQKm accordance with the rules, re under the said rulcs, regulati orities come TO the conclusion that 1 from passing appropn‘ate orde , this order shall.n9i‘t‘§ieclude them ‘Certiiied copy as per P.C.Naik _ i Judge M A r J’ the field and in case thE‘auth gulations and guidelines gdveming axe not entitled for registxation ans and guidelines, the petieoners MW k» rs to thateifect. §S. Sd/- a