IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 16415 of 2008 Between: Shaik Jalal Miyan S/o. Late Fakir Mohammad R/o. H.No.12-15-046/OUC/1/A/1/Z, O.U. Campus, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND The Special Grade Dy. Collector, Outer Ring Road, HUDA Building at Tarnaka, Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondent herein to pay the land acquisition compensation amount as per the proceedings No.J/1704/01, dt. 01.03.2008 and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.T.V.RAJEEVAN Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 16415 of 2008 Oral order: By this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent to pay compensation in terms of the proceedings dated 01.03.2008 of the Inams Tribunal-cum- Special Grade Deputy Collector & Revenue Divisional Oﬃcer, Ranga Reddy District. The petitioner claims that he the Muthawalli of Ashoorkhana, which has an extent of Ac. 2.01 guntas in Sy. No. 54 of Yadgarpalli village, Keesara Mandal, and that Occupancy Rights Certiﬁcate was also granted in his favour. He states that land in an extent of Ac.1.29 cents was acquired by the government for formation of Outer Ring Road Phase-II, and that the respondent has ﬁxed compensation at Rs.8,00,000/- per acre. He states that he being the Muthawalli, is entitled to claim compensation, and as such prays that the respondent be directed to pay compensation as per the order dated 01.03.2008 of the Inams Tribunal, wherein it found that the petitioner being the Muthawalli is entitled to perform the annual celebrations of Muharram. The respondent ﬁled counter stating that the petitioner notice in Form-VII under Sections 9(3) and (1) of the Land Acquisition Act has been issued to both the petitioner and his rival claimant to appear for award enquiry, but neither the petitioner nor the said claimant produced any documentary evidence to establish their title, and that till date, the compensation has not been determined. It is stated that the matter is under consideration before the Legal Services Authority for payment of compensation. The petitioner can participate in the award enquiry and make claim by producing the relevant documents and title deeds to prove his possession and title over the property. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue, and considering the fact that the award enquiry is pending and the petitioner and his rival claimant were called upon to prove their title and possession over the property, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with the following directions: The petitioner is at liberty to participate in the award enquiry and prove his title to the property acquired by the respondent for Outer Ring Road and claim compensation. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 1st September, 2008. KSR ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{MSN}