IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-22306 of 2010 Date of Decision: September 20, 2011 Jagroop Singh .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. S.S. Brar, Advocate, for Mr. V.K. Chaudhri, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Sumeet Goel, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 and 4. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. prays for issuance of directions to respondent Nos.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner who is in danger at the hands of respondent No.4, Dr. Armaandeep Singh, Additional Superintendent of Police, Central Bureau of Investigation, Sector 30-A, Chandigarh. Crl. Misc. No. M-22306 of 2010 [2] 2. It has been pleaded that the petitioner is being harassed by respondent No.4. The petitioner has been cited as a witness in a CBI case. 3. Learned counsel for the CBI states that at one point of time, the investigating agency wanted the petitioner to give a statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. At this stage, however, the petitioner is not required to give any such statement and he shall not be summoned to CBI Police Station. The petitioner is merely a witness in the case. 4. In view of the fact that a statement has been made on behalf of the CBI that petitioner shall not be summoned and shall not be harassed, the petition is disposed of. (AJAI LAMBA) September 20, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?