IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 1303 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 1303 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 1303 OF 2007 Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation .... Petitioner versus Vijay B. Raut ...... Respondent. Shri G.S.Hegde for the petitioner Shri Nilesh Pawaskar i/b. Aparna Vhatkar for the respdt. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 18TH JUNE, 2007 DATED; 18TH JUNE, 2007 DATED; 18TH JUNE, 2007 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. The Idustrial court, allowing a ULP complaint filed by the respondent, has grantd parity to the respondent in the pay scale granted to his juniors. It is undisputed that the respondent was promoted officiating to the post of Junior Assistant prior to some other similarly situate employees. However when the petitioner and those other employees were confirmed as Junior Assistant, the scale of the other Junior Assistants was fixed higher than that was made admissible to the respondent. The order passed by the Industrial court goes to remove this anomaly by directing the petitioner to extent the benefit available in GSO No.990. 2. Perused the order. No interference is called for. In the result the writ petition is summarily dismissed. ...