IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC(T) No. 194 of 2008 Decided on: 22.10.2010 Rakesh Singh …Petitioner. Versus P.L. Subrathan and others. …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner. : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the respondents have complied with the order/judgment passed on 3.9.2002 by earstwhile learned Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal. consequently, the present petition is rendered infructuous and the same is dismissed as infructuous. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge October 22, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?