@tgg; $M§¥LE EEim‘ii r S” 9 H COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH m 7 Anusuiya Bai Dhruv, W/ o. Late M‘R. Dhruv aged‘about 35 years, R/o. Laxmi Provision Stores, Ekta Chowk, Tumgaon Gaon Road, Distt. Mahasamund, (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT(S) f; (1) Chhattisgarh Gramin Bank, through its Chairman, Recreational Road, Caoubey Coiony, Distt. Raipur (cot) (2) Bran Manager, Chhattisgarh Gramin Bank, Branch — Devbhog, Distt. Raiur (C.G. a x) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA N THE HIG , i ch p ) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR (Wlit Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Pramod Verma, Sr. Advocate with Shri Sumit Verma, Advocate for the respondents. ORDER ORAL (Passed on this 3r day of February, 2011) Heard learned counsel for the parties. At the very outset, Shri Verma, learned senior counsel appearing for . the respondents, submits that the policy prevalent at the time of making of application for grant of compassionate appointment would be applicable for consideration of the application. 3. ln view of that, it is not necessary to adjudicate upon the dispute. However, the respondent authorities may consider the application of the petitioner in accordance with the prevailing law and policy, as a‘iorestated, on its own merits and pass order, as expeditiously as possible preferable within a period of four weeks, in view of the fact that the application is for grant of compassionate appointment. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that all the relevant informations necessary for consideration of the application of the petitioner shall be supplied to the respondent authorities within a period of one week. Accordingly, the writ petitionis disposed of. /~ L, sa/ ll l\ otri \ Satish K- Judge Aw“ > ; ll WRIT PETITION (S) NO.104 OF 2009 PETITIONER Anusuiya Bai Dhruv Versus RESPONDENTS Chhattisgarh Gramin Bank & Another