Crl.M. No. M- 33711 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M- 33711 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 29.11.2010 ... Ajay s/o Sajjan Singh ................Petitioner vs. State of Haryana .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. S.K. Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner Sh. Ajay Gulati, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. ... K.C. Puri, J. As per allegation of the prosecution, petitioner was indulging in illegal mining of Bajri from the riverbed. He was apprehended, but his father got freed from the police party and had taken away forcibly the tractor and trolley. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the Bajri was purchased and its receipt Annexure P-1 has been placed on the file. He has further submitted that tractor and trolley belongs to the petitioner. There is no question of attracting the provisions of Section 392 IPC. Prayer has been made that the petitioner is entitled to the concession of anticipatory bail. Crl.M. No. M- 33711 of 2010 -2- The co-accused i.e. father of the petitioner is stated to have been taken into custody and has been granted bail. The petitioner has challenged the authority of police by doing illegal act. The authenticity of Annexure P-1 could only be adjudged during the course of trial. So, no ground for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. Consequently, the petition stands dismissed. ( K.C. Puri ) 29.11.2010 Judge chugh