1 APPR 300/10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 300/2010 IN CRIMINAL REVISON APPLICATION NO. 746 OF 2009 Olam Agro India Ltd. .... Applicant. v/s The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ..... Respondents. Mr. Shaunak Mehta for the applicant. Mr. P.A. Pol, Public Prosecutor for the State. CORAM: V. M. KANADE, J. DATE : 27th September, 2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the applicant. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the applicant submits that by order dated 12/03/2010 this Court (Coram: S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.) was pleased to grant interim relief relating to sugar which was seized by the Collector. After the interim order was passed, the applicant realized that the application was inadvertently filed in the name of the Company which was already changed prior to interim order being passed. Applicant, therefore, was permitted to change 2 APPR 300/10 the name of the Company by carrying out suitable amendment by order dated 03/09/2010. Thereafter, present application has been filed seeking a fresh order for grant of interim relief. 3. In my view, since the interim order has been passed in favour of the applicant by this Court on 12/03/2010, the said order ought to have been implemented and suitable writ ought to have been issued in view of the amendment which was allowed by this court. However, I am informed by the learned Counsel for the applicant that the registry of this Court has asked him to file separate application. 4. It is therefore clarified that the interim order passed by this Court on 12/03/2010 in a group of Criminal Revision Applications including Criminal Revision Application No.746 of 2009 filed by the applicant will apply to the applicant since the applicant has carried out the amendment and changed the name of the Company. 5. Application is accordingly allowed in the aforesaid terms. (V.M. KANADE, J.) 3 APPR 300/10