IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 7TH JUNE 2011 / 17TH JYAISHTA 1933 Con.Case(C). No. 666 of 2009() ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.5359/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN WPC ------------------------------------------------------ PRAKASH.R., AGED 50, S/O.REGHUNATHA PANICKER, KIZHAKKEDATH HOUSE, GOVINDAMUTTOM, KAYAMKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.S.CHANDRASENAN RESPONDENT(S): 2ND RESPONDENT IN WPC ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AJAYAGOSH, AGED (NOT KNOWN), FATHER'S NAME KUTAN, PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, DEVIKULANGARA PANCHAYAT, RESIDING AT PREETHI BHAVAN, ILLIPPIKULAM P.O., VALLIKUNNU PANCHAYAT, ALLEPPEY DIST. * ADDITIONAL RESPONDENT NO.2 IMPLEADED 2. SRI.THANKACHAN, CHAKKALATHARAYIL, GOVINDAMUTTOM, KAYAMKULAM * ADDITIONAL RESPONDENT NO.2 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 30.07.2009 IN I.A NO.321 OF 2009. R1 BY ADV.SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN, SC ADDL. R2 BY ADV. SRI.S.MOHANAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: krj ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ Cont.Case (C) No.666 OF 2009 ===================== Dated this the 7th day of June, 2011 J U D G M E N T It is complaining of disobedience of interim order dated 7/4/2009 in WP(C) No.5359/09 this petition has been filed. Although counter affidavit filed by the respondent indicates that there were some instance of non compliance, it is now submitted that subsequently the writ petition itself was disposed of directing re-consideration of the appeal and that ultimately 5 H.P motor was permitted to be installed by the party respondent. That apart, it is also not in question that the unit of the party respondent is no longer functioning. In view of the aforesaid subsequent developments, I do not consider this to be a fit case for further proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act. Contempt petition is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp