WP(C) 5382/2008 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Let a notice issue calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why a rule should not be issued as prayed for; and/or why such further or ot her order(s) should not be passed as to this Court may deem fit and proper. The notice is made returnable on 9.2.2009. Ms. R. Chakraborty, learned State Counsel, accept notice on beha lf of the respondents No. 1 to 4. Extra copies of the writ petition shall be fur nished to her within one week with due acknowledgement. Steps for service of not ice on the respondent No. 5 shall be taken by registered post within one week. Heard learned counsel for the parties on the interim prayer. The petitioner is aggrieved by Annexure-L order dated 21.11.2008, which has been pa ssed pursuant to the order passed by this Court on 10.11.2008 in WP(C) No. 4660/ 2008. On that occasion, the petitioner made a grievance against his transfer. Ad mittedly, the substantive grade of the petitioner is Tax Collector. He was only allowed to hold the charge of the promotional post of Secretary by order dated 2 5.9.2008 (Annexure-D). Thus, if the petitioner was holding promotional post only as in-charge, when his substantial grade is Tax Collector, the authority is alw ays empowered to revert him back to the substantial post of Tax Collector, which the authority has done by the impugned order. In that view of the matter, prima facie I am satisfied that no c ase for an interim order has been made out by the petitioner. Consequently, the prayer of stay of the impugned order stands rejected.