IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1096 OF 2009 Prakash Shankar Kadam .... Petitioner V/s. The Divisional Traffic Superintendent, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation and Ors. .... Respondents Mr.M.S.Topkar, for the petitioner. Mr.G.S.Hegde, for the respondents. CORAM : S.A.BOBDE, J. DATED : 25TH MARCH, 2009. P.C. 1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Heard by consent. 2. The main contention on behalf of the petitioner is that he has been given three punishments for the same alleged mis-conduct and two of them are not even prescribed for the alleged mis-conduct. However, it appears that this point has not been raised before the lower Court. Having regard to the importance of the point involved in the case of the petitioner, it would be appropriate in the interest of justice to set aside the impugned order and remand the matter back to the Industrial Court, Kolhapur, for fresh decision in accordance with law after permitting the parties to amend the pleadings and place relevant documents on record. The impugned order of the 2 Industrial Court dated 21-06-2008 is accordingly set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Industrial Court for fresh decision in accordance with law. The Industrial Court is directed to decide the matter within a period of six months from the date of appearance. Parties are directed to appear before the Industrial Court on 06-04-2009. ( S.A.BOBDE, J. )