HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT WRIT PETITION NO: 12994 OF 2008 Between: 1. Union of lndia, rep. by its Secretary, Department of Atomic Energy, C.S.M.Marg, Mumbai 2. The Joint Secretary, Department of Atomic Energy, C.S.M.Marg, Mumbai 3. The Chief Executive, Nuclear Fuel Complex, ECIL Post, Hyderabad-500062 4. The Deputy Chief Executive (Administration), Nuclear Fuel Complex, ECIL Post, Hyderabad-500062 ...PETTTTONER(S) AND Shri. K. Purushothama Rao, S/o.Narayana Rl/o.H.No.30-2651111135, Sainadhapuram Near A.S.Rao Nagar, ECIL Post, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of Certiorari in declaring the judgment dated 21.2.2OO8 in OA.No.624 of 2007 on the file of Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad as bad illegal, and void and quash the same. WPMP. NO: 16758 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order dated 21 .2.2008 in OA.No.62412o07 passed by THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR \ the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI R. S. MURTHY Counsel for the Respondents: SMT. N. SHOBA The Court made the following: ORDER I i l I l HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAYILI AND IION'BLE SRI JUS'TICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR W.P.No.12994 of 2008 ORDER: \{lhen the maner is taken up for hearing, leamed counsel on either side fairly conceded that the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the common order dated 22.02.2022 passed by this Coun in \(.P.No .5523 of 2@6 and batch. Following the corrmon order. dated 22.02.2022 in V.P.No.5523 of 2006 U batch and for the reasoru alike, this Vrit Petition is also dismissed. No costs. Miscellaneous petitiorx pending, if any, shall stand closed. \ SD/- MOHD.SANAU LLAH ANSARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/I , SEGTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to SRI R. S. MURTHY, Advocate tOpUCI 2. One CC to SMT. N. SHOBA, Advocate tOpUCl 3. Two CD Copies. 4. One Spare Copy Along with a Copy of the Common Order W.P.No.5523 of 2006 & Batch MP SW dated 22.02.2022 in s HIGH COURT DATED:0810712022 ORDER ,,9 l-' WP.No.12994 of 2008 ., DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS o e,> o .t_ : ,i / l @cq -( k /t HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI W.P.Nos.5523 6343 Of 2006 a'Id27Ll4 27r24 27t35 27L37,27L45, 27146, 27L49,2715O and 27L5L of 2OO7 COMMON ORDER: (Per Ilonlre Sri Justice P. n""*" C^d Heard leamed Assistant Solicitor General for writ petitioners and rj,.' ll.learned counsel for respondents Smt N Shoba for respondents. 2. The claim ofthe respondents in these writ petitions was to Assistant-B from the date of their bility ligi t K otion prom -:. 3. Learned Assistalt Solicitor General submits that though, . 'the orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad bench are challenged in these writ petitions, during the pendency of writ petitions, as directed by the Tribunal in its common order dated 27 ,L0.2006, respondents in these wri[ petitions were granted promotion as Scientifrc Assistant-B with effect frorn 1.2.L992. Court is also informed ttrat 1 1 respondents are in service and 12 from service. circumstances, Court is not inclined to go :r ,.. to ttre validity of the decision of the Tribunal at tl.is distance of time. 1: ',. Accordingly, the writ petitioos are dismissed. No costs. applications, if any pending stand closed. DATE:22.02.2022 Miscellaneous P NAVEEN RAO,J I I I DT. G.RADHA RANI,J {, I I I