IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO : 1297 of 2009 Between: Bogi Uma Devi, W/o. Bogi Rajulu, Parvathipuram, Vizianagaram. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House Officer, Parvathipuram, Vizianagaram District. 2 The Circle Inspector of Police, Parvathipuram, Vizianagaram District. 3 The Superintendent of Police, Vizianagaram. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to for the reasons stated in the "Telegram" dated 23-01- 2009 sent by the Petitioner herein, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue an Order, direction, or a Writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the Respondents herein to produce the Petitioner's husband namely Mr. Bogi Rajulu, before this Hon'ble Court, who is illegally detained by the police, apprehending danger to his life and set him at liberty forthwith and to pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: TELEGRAM Counsel for the Respondents: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following : ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A. Gopal Reddy) This writ petition is taken up on the basis of the telegram, dated 23.01.2009 sent by the petitioner to the Hon’ble the Chief Justice alleging that her husband, namely, Mr. Bogi Rajulu, has been illegally detained by the police, Parvatipuram, and she is apprehending danger to her husband’s life in the hands of the police. In response to the notice, the Sub-Inspector of Police, Parvathipuram Town Police Station, Vizianagaram, the first respondent herein filed counter affidavit stating that the C.I. of Police Parvathipuram summoned the alleged detenu on 23.01.2009 to the Circle Office for enquiry in connection with a petition submitted by one Mr. Chinnari Satyanarayana. Since the subject matter of the said petition is purely of civil in nature, the Circle Inspector of Police advised the parties to work out their remedies before the appropriate Court, and after enquiry, the complainant as well as the alleged detenu left the Circle Office on the same day. Except calling the alleged detenu to the Circle Office for enquiry, he has not been illegally detained. The statement of the alleged detenu recorded by the Tahsildar, Mandal Executive Magistrate, Parvatipuram, dated 7.02.2009 also discloses that the alleged detenu has not been illegally detained by the police, and he is freely moving in the locality by attending his day-to-day business, which do not support the contents of the telegram. Since the statement of the alleged detenu was recorded by the Tahsildar, Parvatipuram, wherein the alleged detenu has stated that he has not been illegally detained by the police, no further adjudication is called for on the telegram sent by the petitioner. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed. ___________________ (A.GOPAL REDDY, J.) ____________________ (B. CHANDRA KUMAR, J.) 16th February, 2009 Js.