EEA{€_) Na, @ Mai ?H§: H$§§ @iuE i‘iaGEi €§LaRi OF €HHATTISGARH A? $ELA§PL§R mjEQQ9 ICICI—Lombard General insurancé Limited, Through; Manager (Lggai), Branch; Fiaépur, Bahadur Shashtri Chouk, District; Raipur (C.G.) ‘\ Comgany “aw“ $GE" agggiCaEit way. 3 VER§U§ gESFGNEENTS : 1. €§aim3m EV §Z§Eaimant Mawkpwiaam hwy ; im‘mer E‘mm-Agwiggm 4" wax 2j®wg§e¥ Lai Raiaur, Bai W/o Narad aged about 28 years, occupation; Housewife Narad 3/0 Ra mjee Chandravamhi, aged absut 3g yeai's occupation; agricuiture Resaondent no.1 8: 2 residents rf Viiiage; T‘hanai; Kawardha Rohani Chandg‘avanshii (Shareware, Pipariya, Tahsii; District; Kabirdham {c.G.) ”ioshao S/o Chandravanshi Bhuiau Ram Chandravanshi, ageci about 4S years, occupatisn; Briver, Rasident of Village, Keshri, Thana; Pipariya, Tahaii; Kawardha Kabiidhami'CG.) Chandravanshi Diairict; Lomagh Sg/o Bhuiau Ram Chandravanshi, aged. about Vehicie OWHaF, Reaiaant or \fiiiage; Keahi’i, iiiazia; 9i Kawamaa Sigh”: 42 yearg, occa’oation; x § @ l\ 1/ AP?EAL EJNER $E£Y1GN 1?3 OF MG?OR VEHECLE ACT iggg @ $331 MAQ ”I MA (QLPR) wL}35/°<3 1am Wm ................. . ............ ‘ ................W Mmvzmm mwafmm S.B. Hon’ble Shri Justice N.K. A 28-1 0-2009 None for the appeHant. The mattef is caued for he' ‘none appears nor any represent tion is made on behalf of the appellant The appeilant may not e Interested In prosecuting the zea— Wmwwmf’ %aif'ema¥%s1 al ring twice. On both occasions, matter prosecution ‘ ‘? Sd/— 1 V Kvr N.K.Agrawal ‘E Judge ~