IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.12828 of 2010 Satish Kumar Vs. State of Haryana & others Present: Mr.Virender Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner had filed a civil suit seeking regularisation. The suit was though decreed but appeal filed by the State was allowed and the judgment and decree were set-aside. The petitioner accordingly came before this court in Regular Second Appeal. Subsequently, he withdrew the Regular Second Appeal with liberty to file a representation. Thereafter, he has filed a representation which has been rejected. He has now filed the present writ petition to challenge that order. Having failed in the civil suit, the petitioner cannot fairly invoke the writ jurisdiction of the court. In any case, the relief claimed is for regularisation. It would be difficult to allow the same in view of the law laid down in Secretary, State of Karnataka and others Vs. Uma Devi (3) and others, 2006(4) SCC 1. Dismissed. July 23, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE