IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15637 of 2001 MD.SIRAJ Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS For the Petitioner : Mr. Najmul Hoda, Advocate. For Private Respondents : Mr. Raghib Ahsan(Sr.Adv.) Abbas Haider, Advocates. For the State : Mr. Dhurendra Kumar(JC to Sc-V) Advocate. ----------- 03. 25.09.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and the counsel for private respondent nos. 3 to 6. 2. Having perused the petition, Annexure-1 on the basis of which Bataidari Case No. 87 of 1999-2000/48 of 2000-01, Annexure- 1 was instituted, I am of the view that the petitioner Bataidar has not given any relevant material information to inform the Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Katihar that there exist a Bataidari dispute between the petitioner Bataidar and the raiyats i.e. private respondent nos. 3 to 6. In the circumstances, I direct the petitioner to file another petition giving materials to suggest that he has been seen cultivating the lands in question as Bataidar by the adjoining raiyats and that he was threatened with ejectment from the lands in question in presence of such and such persons. If such petition is filed giving the aforesaid particulars then the Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Katihar shall consider the same in accordance with law without being prejudiced by his findings recorded under order dated 12.9.2001, Annexure-2 and with this observation this writ application is disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.) - 2 -