IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.6232 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 27.9.2010 Gauri Shankar ....Petitioner Versus Buta Singh ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Rahul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. No legal infirmity has been shown to have been committed in the impugned order. The petitioner is the judgment-debtor who is facing execution proceedings pursuant to a decree held by the respondent in a suit for recovery. Learned counsel for the petitioner very candidly states that he has no means to pay the amount. Having regard to the aforesaid, the impugned order cannot be interfered with in revisional jurisdiction when no error of jurisdiction has been shown. Dismissed. 27.9.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss