HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.1$I l‘IO. 662$ 0f 200? PETITIONER Smt. Sato Rai Sen, aged ahmlt 60 yaars, W/o Late Dhanau Sen, Rio vmaga 65 Pos‘t - Palaxi, District ~ Raipur KEG.) Versus RESPONDEHT$ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, thrauh the SecrCtaIy, Public Works Department, Maxxfxaklya, D.K.S. Bawan, Raipur (C.G.) ‘2. Sub Divisional O$cer, Public Works Department, Sub Division, Baloda Bazar, District — Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE COHSTITUEGE} OF IEDIA Aggearance: ‘ Shri Snm‘l Otwani, counsel’for the petitioner, Shri Ajay Dwiveidj, Pane] Lawyer, appears for the State] 'respondents an advance copy. 'x oRAL ORDER (o 1 . 1 1 .2007; SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. eard. Learned counsel for the petitioner suhmits that a permanent Gangqnan iS to be retired at, the age. of 62 yeam in the Chhnitisgarh Shaskiya, Sevak (Adhivajshiki-Ayvt) Adhim‘yam 1967 read with Fundamental Rules, 56. He also submits that the point. raised has heen decided hy this (Smut. in hatch 0f matters i.e.. W.P.N0.108i2005 and many other connected matters on 04.01.2007, reported in. 2007 {g1 C.G.L.J. 29 (Goviud 3s others Vs. State of C.G.g and this matter is squarely covered by that decision, which may be disposed of on the same terms. accord ance with g h H 3r}x6‘ 2 W.P.§ S 1.N0.6626/2007 Learned counsel for the Sfa‘re fairly agrees that this matter is covered by the: said decision. However, he submits that in some matters the State has filed writ appeals. Unless some interim order is passed, merely on account of filing of the Writ appeal, hearing of this writ petition carinot be kept in aheyance, when the matter is squarely covered hy the said jud gment. In fhe. result, this petition is allowed. It is disposed of in terms of the order dated 04.1.2007 passed in WP. No.108/ 2005 and other connected matters. No order as to costs. T /Ra0/ Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge