:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1229 OF 2003 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1229 OF 2003 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1229 OF 2003 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 946 OF 2003 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 946 OF 2003 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 946 OF 2003 Dena Bank .....Plffs. Plffs. Plffs. vs. Mayo Farms P.Ltd and ors. .....Defnds. Defnds. Defnds. Amit Jain i/b, DSK Legal for the plaintiffs. Sushma Kadam i/b. Arvind Rathod for the defendants. CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATE : 6th October, 2005. P.C. :. 1. The parties have filed consent terms duly signed by them and their advocates. Consent terms taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. There shall be order in terms of the consent terms. Suit disposed off in terms of the consent terms. :2: 2. In view of the disposal ofthe suit itself, Notice of Motion does not survive. The same is dismissed as infructious. Refund of court fees,if any, as per rules. Undertaking given under the consent terms accepted. SD/- **********