THE HONBLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.15706 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner states that having regard to the subsequent order dated 28.08.2008 passed by the Government converting the premises bearing Door No.7/184 of Holmespeta Street, Proddatur from residential zone to commercial zone, the cause in the writ petition does not survive. It is also stated that challenging the order dated 28.08.2008 the petitioner has already filed W.P.No.19609 of 2008. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. 16.08.2008. Kgr IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.15706 of 2008 Between: Ch.Rama Mohan Reddy S/o.Pulla Reddy, R/o.H.No.7/242, Holmespeta,Proddatur,Kadapa District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent, Prohibition and Excise Dept Proddatur, Kadapa District 2 The Prohibition & Excise Inspector, Proddatur Kadapa District 3 The Proddatur Municipality, represented by its Commissioner Proddatur, Kadapa District 4 D.Gurivi Reddy S/o.Not known, licensee of Vignesh Bar & Restaurant D.No.7/289 & 290, Holmespeta,Proddatur, Kadapa District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in granting Form 2B license for Bar and Restaurant to the 4th respondent contrary to Rule-6 (Vi) of AP Excise (Grant of License of Selling by Bar and Conditions of License) Rules, 2005 and further action of the respondents 1 and 2 in proceeding to grant the permission to the 4th respondent to shift his Bar from existing premises to D.No.7/284 of Holmespeta which is a residential area as per the certiﬁcate issued by the 3rd respondent vide endorsement no.1295/2008/G2 dated 18.7.2008 as illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to the aforesaid rules and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. K.RATHANGA PANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court made the following: