IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16905 of 2009 SANJAY PRASAD GUPTA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 21.8.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner a learned APP for the State. Case Under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code was instituted against the petitioner on the basis of a Complaint Case No. 480C of 2008. As per the allegation made in the complaint the complainant is duly married with the petitioner way back in the year, 1999. The matrimony has yielded three children. Thereafter it is alleged that the petitioner went to Bhadohi for his livelihood where he fell in love with another woman, left his job and eloped with her. It is later stated that he returned to village with the lady and started living as husband and wife. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the story is not correct. It is the complainant who has abandoned the petitioner. It is urged that due to certain misunderstanding the complaint case has been filed. Something has seriously gone wrong in the relationship otherwise no wife with three children would have gone ahead and filed the complaint case against the husband. The husband has certain explanation to offer but that will be done during the course of trial. So far as the question of bail is concerned an - 2 - opportunity is given to the petitioner so that he may turn around and make some meaning to his life. Let the petitioner, namely, Sanjay Prasad Gupta be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Complaint Case No. 480C of 2008., RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)