WK1T PET1T10N (S) No. 4673 of2«07 Dr. R.S.Dw-ivedi, S/o Baikuntfa Prasad Dw'ivedi, Aged about 56 yeare, R/o. C/o Dr. S.K.Mishra. Veterinarv Assistant Surgeon. Ainbikapur, Vctermar^' Hospital, Anibikapur, istt. Sureuja (CG) WRSUS 1) State ot' Chhattisgarli, Through Secretarv, Agricultore (Veteriiiary) Departmeiit, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur District Raipur (CG) 2) Director, Vsteraiary Services Chliattisgarh, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG) 3) Ocputy OiTcotQi", VctsriusiTy Ssr^'icss, Ambikapur, Sursuja, Distt. Surgiija (CG) 4) Dr- M.P.Pandey, Veterinary Assistant Surgeon, Veterinary Hospital, Champa, District Jaajgir-Champa (CG) WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ART1CLE 226 OF THE CONSTmjTlON OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Stni Satish K. Asiuhotri, J. Present: Shn Maaoj Paranjpe, Advocate tbr the petitioner. Si-iri Vivek Shamia, Pane! Lawyer fortho Statei'respondents 1 to 3. .''Tlficop.-I nn iq<fa rln,t7^'A"a"1c+ '71 ^JL ^woCU Ull ^^ U(i^ :-J1 ^-^.ueiUat., AW /^ 1. By the instaiit petition, the petitioner has challenged his transfer order dated 29.06.2007 (Annexure P/4) wherebv he has been transfen-ed from Artificial Inseniination Centre Surajpiir, Ajiibixapur, District Surguja to Development Block, Khadgawaii. Distnct Koria. 2. The main srievance of the petitioner is that as per the GovemiTient order dated 16.08.1999 (Armexure P/5) beina a senior most Veterinary Assistant Sureeon. he is entitled for postins ia a A-Grade hospital because he has completed 20 years of serviee, whereas, by the impugned order, he has been posted in a B-Grade hospital, which is contrary to the Govemment order dated 16.08.1999. 3. At the outset. leamed counsel for the petitioner submittsd that the petitioner is not interested in continuing at the oresent plaee. his claim is that he should be posted anywhere in the State of Chhattisearh in any A-Grade hospital for which he is entitled as per Govemment order dated 16.08.1999. 4, The prayer made by leained counsei for the petitioner appears to be just, fair and reasonable, therefore, he is allowed to make a detailed representatioa to respondent No. 1 wittun ten davs from todav raisina all his g-ievances and in tuni. respondent No. 1 shall decide the same within a oeriod of 30 davs from the date of receipt of the representation in accordance with law after considering all the grievances raised by the petitioner. 5. Iii the meantime. till the decision of the represeiitation. the effect aad operation ofthe impugned order dated 29.06.2007 (Anaexure P/4) in respect ofthe petitioner herein, shall reinain stayed. 6. With the direction aforesaid. the petition stands disposed of. 7. Consequeatly, I.A. No. 1, application for interim relief, stands disposed of. Certified copv. in accordance with Rules. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit