IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.15071 OF 2009 LAKHAN YADAV @ ALAKH YADAV, SON OF BHUKHAN YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SAGAR CHATTO, P.S. WAZIRGANJ (TANKUPA), DISTRICT GAYA VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 30.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The case is under sections 25(1-B) A and 26 of the Arms Act. From the order dated 14.9.2009 it appears that petitioner had criminal antecedent and learned counsel for the petitioner was granted time to file supplementary affidavit giving details of the said cases pending against petitioner. A supplementary affidavit has been filed and an order dated 5.10.2009 passed by a Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No.14165 of 2009 has been produced to show that in a case under Section 302 of the I.P.C. petitioner was allowed bail by this Court on the ground that except for suspicion, there was no cogent material against petitioner in the case. It is stated that in the second case under the Arms Act, he has been allowed bail. Petitioner is in custody since - 2 - 27.8.2008. It is stated that after petitioner was arrested in this case he was remanded in other two cases only on the basis of suspicion. Considering the above facts and circumstances, this application is allowed. Let petitioner (Lakhan Yadav @ Alakh Yadav) be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Wazirganj P.S. Case No.85/07 with conditions as laid down in sub-section (3) of Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as may be applicable and also that one of the bailors shall be a close relation of the petitioner. In case of breach of any of the conditions at any stage to the satisfaction of the concerned court below, it shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner and take steps for his arrest. B.T (J.N. Singh, J.)