IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11158 of 2010 BAIJU RAI, SON OF SHIV SHANKAR RAI. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 28.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Even though, initially the petitioner was alleged to have committed the murder of his wife along with other family members of ends of dowry but, during investigation, the allegation against him was found to be false and, therefore, a final report was submitted. However, after examination of some witnesses, the petitioner was summoned under Section 319 Cr. P.C. for which now he has been behind the Bar since 20.12.2007. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 9th Additional Sessions Judge, East Champaran Motihari, in Sessions Trial No. 26 of 2005 arising out of Ghorasahan P.S. Case No. 142 of 2004 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will 2 be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)