IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39182 of 2008 BASU MAHTO @ BASUDEO MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 22.12.2008 Heard Sri Sunil Kumar Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The case has been registered on a petition of complaint under Section 304B IPC under Section 156(3)Cr.P.C. The petitioner, of course, named in the FIR but it is contended that he is in no way related or connected with the husband and that for the said incident a U.D. case was registered after about two days of the incident the complaint petition was filed. Regard being had to the above facts and circumstances and specially to the fact that the petitioner is not relative of the husband, let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate,(West), Muzaffarpur in Baruraj P.S.Case No.21 of 2006. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )