IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12242 of 2009 RAJENDRA PRASAD SINGH Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 22.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner was leading Police Party, who effectively performed his duty. There was confidential information regarding veteran criminals and the Police Party reached there. There was firing and cross firing, in which three of the criminals received injuries resulted into their death. From there, automatic gun and ornaments were recovered, but deceased brother has informed after three days of the incident making imaginary allegations which can never justify the refusal of petitioner’s anticipatory bail. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Complaint Case no. 369C of 1992 (Tr. No. 199 of 2001), above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)