yr HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR '- Writ Petition (Q No. 6319 of 2008 Petitioner Versus Respondents 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Dayanaad Prasad, S/o Raoieshwar Prasad, aged about 35 years, R/o Jam.at Mandir Para, Kawardha, Distiict Kawardha (CG) State of Chhattisgarh, fhrough tiie Secretas^7, Departraent of Excise, D.K.S. Bhawan, Maatralaya, Raipur, Distdct Raipur (CG) The Coinniissioner of Excise, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Shiv Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) The Asst. ComTnissioner of Excise, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Bitaspur, District Bilaspur (CG) The CoUector (Excise)/Licensmg Authority under fhe Excise Act, BHaspur (CG) Gidshau Rishi, S/o Late Mulakraj Rishi, aged not known to the petitioner, R/o Green Park Colony, Jarhabhata, Bilaspur (CG) (Writ Petition underArticle 226 offhe Constitution of India) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotd J.) Shri B. P. Sharm.a, Advocate for the petitioner, Shri Arun Sao, Gtovt. Advocate for tlie respoudeuts No. 1 to 4. ORDER(orali ( Passed on this 22nd day ofJuly, 2009) Heard. 1. Learaed counsel appearing for fhe petitioner, on iastructions, subinits that fhe petitioner seeks permission of ttiis Court to withdraw the wriit petition. 2. Leamed counsel appeariiig for fhe respondents/State has no objection. 3. The writ petition is accorduigly disinissed, as withdrawn. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur