IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.230 of 2005 Date of Decision 11.11.2010 Harbhajan Singh ...... Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab and others ...... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.R.K.Dadwal, Advocate, with Mr.Mandeep Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Amit Chaudhary, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab, for respondent No.1-State. Mr.Rajiv K.Trikha, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 22. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J: Challanege in this petition is to the judgment of acquittal dated 09.06.2004, passed by Judicial Magistrate IIst Class, Hoshiarpur. Heard. Having gone through the impugned judgment, it transpires that the same sans any defect, illegality much less irregularity, warranting interference by this Court. The prosecution has failed to establish its possession over the land in question. The Civil Courts have also decided the issue of possession against the complainant. No sufficient and reliable evidence has been led by the prosecution in order to prove the tresspass as well as the theft of the alleged case property. As such, findings returned by the trial Court do not call for any interference at this revisional stage. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 11.11.2010 mamta-II