HVN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 827 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 827 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 827 OF 2007 WITH WITH WITH REVIEW APPLICATION (ST) NO. 27302 OF 2007 REVIEW APPLICATION (ST) NO. 27302 OF 2007 REVIEW APPLICATION (ST) NO. 27302 OF 2007 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2249 OF 2002 WRIT PETITION NO. 2249 OF 2002 WRIT PETITION NO. 2249 OF 2002 Shri. Shamsundar Pandurang Kulkarni ..Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Kshirsagar for the Applicant. Mrs. Sushma Bhende, A.P.P. for State. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & K.U.CHANDIWAL,JJ. K.U.CHANDIWAL,JJ. K.U.CHANDIWAL,JJ. DATED: JUNE 19, 2008 DATED: JUNE 19, 2008 DATED: JUNE 19, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . The Civil Application is for condonation of delay. We condone the delay. . The Review Petition is to review the order dated April 09, 2007. . The Petition filed was against the order passed by Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.We shall consider a few contentions raised on behalf of the petitioner which were decided. The first contention was that he was not given the benefit of advance increment. There was a finding of fact that he did not meet the benchmark. The second relief was to get the benefit on account of detecting irregularities. That scheme came into force subsequent to the Petitioners having retired from service and it was not retrospective. The Petitioner was therefore, not entitled to the same. . We have perused the review Application. We do not find any ground made out for review. . The application for Review stands dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.) (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.) (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)