KPP -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 202 of 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 10609 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 254 OF 2010 Balu Chandar Kapse ...Appellant vs. The Dy. Director, Land Records and others ...Respondents Mr. S.V. Sadavarte for the appellant. Mr. A.D. Kango, AGP, for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and 5. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & A.A. SAYED , JJ. DATE: JUNE 20, 2011. P.C. This appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge dated 20th July, 2010 in Civil Application No. 1872 of 2010. The learned single Judge found that the scheme of consolidation was finalised under the provisions of Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 in the year 1955. The appellant applied for modification of the scheme in the year 2009. The learned single Judge rightly found that such an application at such a belated stage was rightly not considered by the Government and we do not find any error in the order of the learned single Judge in this behalf. Letters KPP -2- Patent Appeal therefore deserves to be dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant,however, submitted that a civil suit is pending between the parties. If the appellant has any right, title or interest in the said suit in any manner, he can agitate all these points available to him in accordance with law in the pending suit. This Court is not required to go into the merits or otherwise of the pending civil suit between the parties. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the entry in the revenue record is only for fiscal purposes. It will be open to the appellant to canvass all these points in the pending civil suit in accordance with law. Subject to what is stated above, the Letters Patent Appeal and the Civil Application are dismissed. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. A.A. SAYED, J.