SgiSlf 8FNC14 c ^ ^. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR .^^ Writ Petition (S) No. of 2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Q.- ^^ ,'-^u"/)^ x/Y^^'^ ^^y ^'s-' yu ,..^-"' ."^ «.-' ; / Tikam Sahu, Age 45year S/o Shri Kauwli Ram Sahu Occupation-Panchayat Secretary at Village Panchayat Panktiya R/o Village Kaneshar BloGk-Chhura, Tahsil Chhura District-Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State ofChhattisgarh Through the Principal Secretary Panchayat & Rural Development Departiiient, D.K.S. Bhawan, Manta-alaya, Raipur (C.G.) '2. The Collector, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. The ChiefExecutive Officer, Zilla Panchayat, Raipur (C.G.) / 4. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat-Chhura, District- Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION (S) N0.5714 OF 2010 Tikam Sahu Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others Gowri (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- None for the petitioner. Ms. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 5 day of January, 2011) 1. The matter is called for hearing. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. 2. In view of the above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. Consequently, interim order passed earlier stands discharged. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge