IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1804 of 2009 AJOY KUMAR MITRA SON OF RAMESH CHANDRA MITRA RESIDENT OF MOHALLA MITHAPUR B. AREA, P.S. JAKKANPUR, TOWN AND DISTRICT PATNA. Versus 1. TRIPURARI SHARAN SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY AND COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF FOOD, CIVIL SUPPLY AND CONSUMER PROTECTION GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. MR. RANA AWADHESH SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE THEN MANAGING DIRECTOR, BIHAR STATE FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD. 5TH FLOOR SONE BHAWAN, BIRCHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA 3. MR. PRADEEP KUMAR SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, BIHAR STATE FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD. 5TH FLOOR SONE BHAWAN, BIRCHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA. 4. SMT. BIMLA PRASAD WIFE OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, CHIEF OF ADMINISTRATION, BIHAR STATE FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION, 5TH FLOOR, SONE BHAWAN, BIRCHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA. ----------- 3 10/02/2010 Communication dated 25.01.2010 has been brought on record by the petitioner in supplementary affidavit filed today. From the said communication it is apparent that the respondents have finally taken steps to release the benefit claimed by him in the earlier writ application. The petitioner, however, raises three disputes or still has three grievances left. First is that the replacement scale - 2 - given to him is not correct replacement scale as notified by the 5th Pay Revision Commission, secondly that the petitioner has never taken any advance from Muzaffarpur Branch of Rs.15,500/- and thirdly the scooter advance was only to the tune of Rs.6000/- and not Rs.32,000/-. Due to the above a sum of Rs.41,500/- extra has been deducted form the petitioner illegally. So far as the first grievance is concerned, the Court has no opinion to express in view of the position stated by the learned Senior Counsel for the respondent Corporation that that is the pay scale available to all the employees under the Corporation. If the petitioner has any higher claim, on that issue he should approach the Court afresh. With regard to extra deductions under the two heads in the light of the statements made in paragraph 3 of the supplementary affidavit, the respondents will be well advised to re-check the accounts and communicate to the petitioner their response to the objection raised by him. This verification and if necessary adjustment of accounts must be made within a period of six weeks from the date of production or communication of a copy of this order. - 3 - The contempt application is now disposed of in view of the above stated developments. AMIN (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)