J^^!>1^ HD5M COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AJ BILASPUR Writ Petition f5) No. 3035 of 20)8 Petitioner Harishtinan Sii^h Parihar, S/o. Shri Sakhindra Pratap Singh, aged cfcout 61 years, Retired Assistant Gi-ade-II (U.b.C.) froin the office of Jail Headquarter, Jiaifiur, C.6.), R/o. Village- Ujnel'ii, Post- Harduu Ktdon, Tahsil- Nogod, bistrict 5atnfl (M.P.) Versus Respondents 1- TheState of Chhottisgorh, Thraugh ths Principal 5ecretary, Home Eiqxu'tment, &.K.S. Bhawwi, Raipur (C.6.5. 2. Ths Oirector Seneral d Inspeclov Seneral, (Prisons) 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh. Raipur. 3. The Deputy Inspecror 6er»ral (Prisons) Jail Heud Office, Ruipur, Sovt. of Chhaf-isgarh. Rdipur (C.6-). WKTT PETTTOIN UN&Bt ARTICLE 226 (V THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA Single Bwich : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agrohatri. J. 5hri Alok Nigain, Adyocote for the petitioner. Shri Y- S. Thakur, Eleputy Advocate Seneral for- the respandents. ORAL Oft&ER (Passed on this l9til doy of June, 2(X)8) t. Wfth the consent of the parh'es the niottar is taken up for finol hearing. 2. This matter parteins to petira! dues. This Court in -rtie inatter of Writ Petition No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandat Vs. The Stote of Chhatti^orh & others) and other connected matters, decided on 31.1.2008. directed -the Committee to con^der the nwtter of retira! dues as -the disputed question of facts were involved. Tha Committee uias constituted by -the State Sovemment, pursuont to 3. 4. T- Thfter the order dated 19.6.2006 passed in W.P.No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. Stnte Sovemment flnd olhers) and order dated 13.3.2008 possed m th.C.C. No. 108/2008 (S+ate of Oihotti^arh nnd o-thers Vs. Bai^tath Mandal and onother). Thus, •rtiis petition is squorely covered by -the judgment and order cfa+ed 31 of Jwruory, 2008 passed in W.P.No. 4642/2004 (BaijmrH'i Mandol Vs. The Stata of Chhattisgarh & others) and o-ther cannected matters, as submitted by lenmed counsel qipearfrig for the parti^. With -the consuit of the parties, this petitwn is accordingly di^iosed of n the saine is.rnis i.e. the office of the Advocate Seneral 'is directed to send the case 1o the Committee. uii-rtiin a period of 1S dcys from the dnte of r-ece^t ofd copy of the petition from the petttioner atongurith a copy of this order. Thei^after, the Committee shall issue natice to the peti+ioner ond the officers concemed, within a fur+her period of 15 cfoys. The Committee skall consider and pass order, in accordance with law. aftet' affording proper oppbrtuni-ty of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner anci the officer concemed ipay file addilional documents, if necessary- The entire exercise, including payment of r'etinil dues, if any, to +he petitioner be comple-ted iii-thffi a period of four months from ihe. date of receipt of +he file from the office of the Advocate Seneral- Th& petitioner shall ajpply extra copy of the petition to learned counael appenring for the respondwi+s, for sending to the soid committee. -\—~~ f •Sd/— \ Satish K. Agnihotn i Judge