-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2008 Ashok Shankar Shilimkar ...Appellant versus Tata Engineering and Locomotive Company Ltd., Pimpri ....Respondents Mr. J. Shekhar, instructed by M/s. J. Shekhar & Company, for the appellant. Mr. C.U. Singh, Senior Advocate, with Mr. K.S. Bapat and Mr. Mahesh Londhe, instructed by M/s. Sanjay Udeshi & Co., for the respondent. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & J.P. DEVADHAR, J. DATE: JANUARY 07, 2008. P.C. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. Challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 10th April, 2007 passed by the learned single Judge, who dismissed the writ petition primarily on the ground that the fairness of the enquiry was already upheld and the order upholding part-I award of the Labour Court has attained finality. Further it has been observed that the charges against -2- the petitioner are of serious nature and on the basis of article of charges, departmental enquiry was concluded. There was no evidence produced by the workman. The enquiry officer has held that the charges against the petitioner were proved. The article of charges related to disruption of work which affected peace and discipline at the work place. We do not see any reason to interfere with the order passed by the learned single Judge and appeal is dismissed in limine. CHIEF JUSTICE J.P. DEVADHAR, J.