IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN TUESDAY, THE 16TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 27TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 4827 of 2010(O) ------------------------------------- (I.A. NO.419/2010 IN O.S. NO. 245/2007 BEFORE MUNSIFF COURT, TIRUR) ........... PETITIONER: ------------------- ABDUL NAZER, S/O. NOORUDHEEN, PALAPPETTI HOUSE, ATHRUSSERY.P.O., PONMUNDAM AMSOM DESOM, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.JAMSHEED HAFIZ. RESPONDENT: ---------------------- PONMUNDAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, PONMUNDAM.P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/02/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. P. BHAVADASAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C). No. 4827 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 16th day of February, 2010. JUDGMENT This is a petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash Ext.P4 order in I.A.419 of 2010 in O.S.245 of 2007 before the Munsiff's Court, Tirur, whereby the court declined to refer the matter to the Adalat. 2. The suit was one for realization of amount from Panchayat, which was given as security by the petitioner. The petitioner had taken on rent a building of the Panchyat and he had surrendered the same. He sought return of the deposit. 3. The suit is listed for trial to 16.2.2010. It appears that on 11.2.2010 the petitioner moved the court below to have the matter referred to the Adalat on 13.3.2010. The court declined the prayer and pointed out that since the suit is listed to 16.2.2010, it is unnecessary to refer it to the Adalat held on 13.3.2010. WPC. 4827/2010. 2 4. One fails to understand how the petitioner is aggrieved by the order. The suit was of the year 2007 and this court is given to understand that the written statement was filed in 2008. If there is any intention to have the matter referred to the Adalat, he could have moved the court below for referring the matter much before. The suit was listed for trial to 16.2.2010 and thereafter he has moved the court for sending the matter to Adalat. The court below felt that the attempt of the petitioner is only to protract the trial. No jurisdictional or other errors are found in the order of the court below. This petition is without merits and accordingly it is dismissed. P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE sb.