IN THE M P STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TBIBUNAL: JABALPUR. ——————————————————— --‘—-——a——~-- --~-—n--H—‘— ‘ I ‘ who s3 5% 0.A. No {Q33 OF 1994. BETWEEN Depcharan Banjare, Ex-Censtabie No.858, son of Shri Girdharilal Banjare, aged 35 years, now R/o Village-Sukhatal, Post Office— Thengabhat, Tahsil—Bemetara, Bistrict-Durg (FILE) AND The State of Madhya Prédesh through Secretary, Ministry ‘ of Home & Police, BHOPAL(M.P.) Addltlonal Supermtendent of Pollce BURG 0&1’) Now-APPLICANrs; 2O 3. Superintendent ef Poli¢e, District-Bum; (M.P.) 4. Deputy Inspector General 9f Polica Raipur Range, RAIPUR (M. P. ) 5. Birector General of Police, police Head avatar, BHOPAL (mm) TRIBUVALS_§Q§_, 128g HIGH éGUET §F $HHiiT?iS(?ARI-i : §IL §PUR WRIT PE i m§§ iSi N§$§jj2635 3mm; Eénch: Hen’ ie Shri 3§fi§h K. Aqnihotfigg. Presem: a None far ihe peiitioner. Ms‘ Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for tha State, QML ORDER (?assed m1 thi§ Tit“ day o? 3epiember. 2$6§) The matter is cailed for hearing i‘wice. i‘m bath accasicns, none appears nor any represenia‘iian is made on behaif of the petitioner. The petitioner may noi be inierested in ihe maiier. (‘2) In View of the above. the writ petition is dismieseo for want of prosecution. Registry is ciirected to semi a copy of this ora‘er to the petitioner forthwith. sw— E Satish K. Agnihotrii Judge ? ‘i’iTiEWi‘R Deocharan Banjare Versus RE$?§NQENT§ 8wi‘e a? Madhya F’t‘adesh and others