IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.2740 of 2009 Between: K.Subhashini W/o.T.Mahesh R/o.Ram Nagar, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House Officer, Osmania University Police Station, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad. 3 The Director General of Police, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 4 Sri.K. Satyam S/o.Satti Raju R/o.H.No.12-13-222, Flat No.202, Sri Venkateswara Nilayam, Tarnaka, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or order more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action respondent No.4 herein in illegally confining the petitioner in the Respondent No.4 home from November 23rd 2008 to January 29th 2009 as illegal, arbitrary and against the violation of Art. 21 of the Constitution of India. It is also further prayed to declare the action of the respondent No.1 herein in threatening the petitioner’s brother-in-law on mobile to disclose the whereabouts of the petitioner and her husband knowingly well that they are majors, married and leading voluntarily marital life, as illegal and misuse of public office and violation of Art.21 of the Constitution of India. It is Further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to declare that the petitioner and her husband are legally wedded wife and husband by virtue of marriage dated 10.8.2008 and not to interfere in their peaceful marital life by the respondents No.1 & 4 herein and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.V.RAGHUNATH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.2740 OF 2009 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. _________________ JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA 3rd March, 2009 IBL