IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10730 of 2010 RUCKY KUMAR @ NISHANT VERMA @ NISHAT KUMAR VERMA @ ROCKY, SON OF LATE BHOLA PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 13/04/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 363, 365, 364A of the Indian Penal Code. The case was instituted against unknown persons but thereafter the petitioner was nabbed on the basis of traces of the Mobile phone having been used in the transaction of demand of ransom. The petitioner was apprehended with the Mobile phone which was being used for demand of ransom and it is on his statement the boy was recovered from the house of co-accused Vijay Prasad and Kanti Devi. In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial in view of the seriousness of the nature of the offence. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)