IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.672 of 2008 AMRITA DEVI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. ANIYA DEVI 3. JHALIYA DEVI 4. TUNIYA DEVI 5. PARICHHAN SAH. ----- 2 15.12.2008 This revision application has been preferred against the order of acquittal dated 17.4.2008 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.IV, Motihari in Sessions Trial No. 485 of 2003/ 19 of 2007. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the court below has not properly appreciated oral as well as medical evidence and has wrongly acquitted the opposite parties. However, on perusal of the impugned judgment it appears that the evidence of the doctor completely negated the theory prosecution .The cause of death was of drowning and not of assault as alleged. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case .I find no reason to interfere in the impugned judgment of acquittal. This application is accordingly dismissed. B.Jha (Ghanshyam Prasad)