1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICAUTRE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICAUTRE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICAUTRE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY COMPANY COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 23 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 23 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 23 OF 2005 Ram Laxman Hotels Ltd. ... Petitoienr Vs. IndusInd Bank Ltd. ... Respondent Ms. Dipti Das Gupta i/by Dunmorr Sett for Applicant. Ms. Mohini Gaikwad i/by Ms. Vandana D. Jaisingh for Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR,J. : A.M. KHANWILKAR,J. : A.M. KHANWILKAR,J. DATED DATED DATED : JUNE 16, 2005 : JUNE 16, 2005 : JUNE 16, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard counsel for the Parties. The counsel for the respondent has no objection if the application is made absolute in terms of Prayer Clause (b). Accordingly application made absolute in terms of Prayer Clause (b) only. . In so far as Prayer Clause (a) is concerned, the counsel for the respondents points out that in terms of order dated 22.3.2002 advertisement has been published in respect of the company. If it is so, the petition cannot be disposed of as infructuous unless the withdrawal is also advertised. It will be open to the parties to take out appropriate proceedings as may be advised. Office to issue cheque in the name of advocates on 2 record for the applicant provided the advocates satisfies the office that the advocate on record is duly authorised by the applicant in that behalf. (A.M. (A.M. (A.M. KHANWILKAR,J.) KHANWILKAR,J.) KHANWILKAR,J.)