IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2743 of 2008 VIDHYA KUMARI, WIFE OF CHANDRA BHUSAN PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MALAPA, P.S. GURARU, DISTRICT GAYA. ---- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GAYA. 3. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GURARU, DISTRICT GAYA. 4. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, GURARU, DISTRICT GAYA. 5. THE MUKHIYA MALPA GRAM PANCHAYAT OF GURARU BLOCK, DISTRICT GAYA. 6. ASHA KUMARI, WIFE OF PRAMOD PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MALPA, P.S. GURARU, DISTRICT GAYA. ---- RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2 30.3.2011 The petitioner has alleged that the respondent no. 6 Asha Kumari was appointed as an Anganwari Sevika in Gram Panchayat Malpa, Prakhand Guraru in the district of Gaya. It has been alleged at the time of her appointment that her mark-sheet with respect to her passing the required examination was held to be doubtful by the Mukhiya. The Mukhiya has written to the District Magistrate, Gaya to take steps to make an enquiry on this issue. A counter affidavit has been filed stating therein that steps are being taken to make an enquiry regarding the mark-sheet produced by Asha Kumari. In view of the stand taken on behalf of the State that steps are being taken to make enquiry, I direct that the District Magistrate, Gaya should expedite the matter and ensure that the enquiry is made within a period of three months on receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner would be at liberty to produce this order before the District Magistrate, Gaya. Needless to say that if an adverse report comes against respondent no. 6 (Asha 2 Kumari), notice should be issued to her, the Mukhiya, the C.D.P.O. and after hearing the parties, the matter should be disposed of within a period of further three months on effective service of notice to Asha Kumari. This writ application is disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction. Sanjay ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)