IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 9323 of 2008 Between: Pampana Ramanna, S/o. Veeraswamy, R/o. L.V.N.Puram Village, Bhimavaram Mandal, West Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Tahasildar, Bhimavaram Mandal,West Godavari District. 2 Veeravalli Gangajalam, S/o. Bhadradri, R/o. L.V.N Puram Village, Bhimavaram Mandal,West Godavari District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropraite order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not considering the petitioners representation dated 22.2.2008 and not putting him in possession of the B-form pata land to an enxtent of Ac.0.03 cents situated in Sy.No.808 of assignment land of L.V.N.Puram Village, Bhimavaram Mandal, West Godavari District. as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, and violation of Article 300-A of the Constitution of India, and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.V.L.NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 9323 of 2008 Order: The petitioner claims to have occupied the land to an extent of 0.10 cents, situated in Survey No.808 of L.V.N. Puram village, Bhimavaram Mandal, West Godavari District, constructed a thatched house and living therein since more than 50 years. He states that the Government also issued B-Form patta dated 31.10.1984 in his favour in respect of the said land. While so, it is the case of the petitioner that when the 2nd respondent illegally taken away his patta, and forcefully evicted him from the land in question, he made a representation dated 22.02.2008 requesting the 1st respondent, namely the Tahsildar, Bhimavaram, to enquire into the matter and hand over the said property to him, but so far no action thereon had been taken. Hence, he filed the present writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, and both of them agreed for disposal of the writ petition with the following directions: Respondent No.1, namely the Tahsildar, Bhimavaram Mandal, West Godavari District, is directed to consider and dispose of the representation dated 22.02.2008 of the petitioner, and pass appropriate orders thereon, expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 25.04.2008 Ksr/Nsr