- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1353 OF 2001 WRIT PETITION NO.1353 OF 2001 WRIT PETITION NO.1353 OF 2001 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : AUGUST 11,2005 : AUGUST 11,2005 : AUGUST 11,2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Shri Sonwalkar for the Applicant, the learned Advocate for Respondent No.1 and learned A.P.P. for Respondent No.3-State. The Courts below have held that the Respondent No.1 is entitled to maintenance. After appreciating the evidence on record the Courts below have disbelieved the case made out by the Petitioner that his marriage with Respondent No.1 was void. 2. In a Writ Petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India, no interference is called for. Petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE