IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.49068 of 2008 CHHOTE LAL SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 19.12.2008 Heard. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under sections 395 and 397 of Indian Penal Code. Although F.I.R. is against unknown but from perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the as many as three persons have identified the petitioner escaping from the place of occurrence after commission of the crime. Counsel for the petitioner has not explained the said material in the bail petition and therefore it appears that the same stands accepted. In the facts and circumstances, his bail application stands rejected. The petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after 7 months if in the mean while, the trial of the case is not taken up. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J )