IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2011 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 34405 of 2011(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. DEEPAK K, 23 YEARS, S/O SIVAGOPALAN.K, SREEVALSAM, PURUSSERY PO, PALAKKAD. 2. MOHAMMED THAYYIB V.A. VEETILVALPIL HOUSE, PUNNAYUR PO, THRISSUR. 3. VINEETH MOHANAN, REVATHY, THRAKKAD, ETHANU PO, PALAKKAD. 4. SHEMNA JAFFER, D/O JAFFER ALI 392/3 VELLANTHARA KOLLENGODE PO, PALAKKAD. 5. NINAN T.CHANDY, 22 YEARS, S/O CHANDY.T. THENADAPUZHA HOUSE, MEENA NAGAR, KALMANDAPAM, PALAKKAD. 6. VINOD KRISHNAN P SREEPADMAM DEVI NAGAR, PO POONKUNNAM, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.U.BALAGANGADHARAN WPC NO.34405/11 -2- RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DT 673635. 2. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DT 673635. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.34405/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DT 7.12.11 WITH FEE RECEIPT SUBMITTED BY FIRST PETITIONER. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DT 7.12.11 WITH FEE RECEIPT SUBMITTED BY SECOND PETITIONER. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DT 7.12.11 WITH FEE RECEIPT SUBMITTED BY THIRD PETITIONER. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DT 7.12.11 WITH FEE RECEIPT SUBMITTED BY FOURTH PETITIONER. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DT 7.12.11 WITH FEE RECEIPT SUBMITTED BY FIFTH PETITIONER. EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DT 7.12.11 WITH FEE RECEIPT SUBMITTED BY SIXTH PETITIONER. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 34405 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 21st day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the 3rd and 5th Semester examinations were declared, they failed in some papers. They applied for revaluation as per Exts.P1 to P6 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the University for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp