1 WP No.4292/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4292 OF 2011 Mr Ramesh Mahadeo Mhatre and others. ..Petitioners Versus Nr Gangadhar Sadashiv Mhatre and ors. ..Respondents Mr Kuldeep S Patil, Advocate for the petitioners. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. Date : 18th July, 2011. P.C.: 1. Having heard Shri Patil appearing for the petitioners, I am of the view that no interference is required with the order of the Commissioner, Konkan Division, Mumbai. The Civil Court's declaration is limited in character. On the basis of the same the petitioners cannot seek a relief that their names be entered into the revenue records. If the petitioners have any such right in addition to the performance of Puja at the temple and particularly in the immovable property itself, then neither the orders passed by the Commissioner or the other authorities, nor any observation therein would prevent them from seeking appropriate relief and claiming appropriate declaration and, that too from the competent forum/court. Subject to all these rights and contentions therein, this writ petition is dismissed. (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.) T