IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3254 of 2008 ABDUL RASHID KHAN, son of Late Sahid Khan, resident of Village- Horidih, Police Station – Anti, District – Gaya, Assistant Teacher of Subject English in Government High School, Anti, Gaya ……………Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Mr. Bhirgu Nath Upadhyay, Director Secondary Education Department, Government of Bihar, Budh Marg, Patna 3. Mr. Prakash Ranjan Kumar, Regional Deputy Director of Education, Magadh Division, Gaya 4. Mr. Brajesh Kumar Ojha, District Education Officer, Gaya 5. Mr. Md. Moinuddin, Acting Head Master,Government High School, Anti, Gaya ……Opposite parties ----------- 5. 28.04.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The writ Court set aside the order of termination on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice. There was no specific order for reinstatement. The opposite parties issued a fresh show cause notice and passed a fresh order of termination which specifically recites that the petitioner was fully heard through his Counsel. The submission on behalf of the petitioner that the show cause notice given to him was not in accordance with law as he was required tobe reinstated first and that the fresh order of termination was also not sustainable in law, are matters which can only be considered in a freshly constituted writ application. In the nature of the order passed this Court finds it difficult to proceed any further in the contempt jurisdiction. The MJC application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)