1. CW-3116/2006 - Raj Nahar Shramik Sangthan Vs. State & Ors. 2. NO.1299/2006 - Jaisalmer Zila OD Samaj Vikas Sansthan Vs. State & Ors. : Order dt.20.5.08 1/2 1. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3116/2006 Raj Nahar Shramik Sangthan Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. 2. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1299/2006 Jaisalmer Zila OD Samaj Vikas Sansthan Vs. State & Ors. Date of order : 20th May, 2008 PRESENT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. N.K. Chandak) for the petitioners. Mr. Jamwant ) Mr. Arjun Singh, Dy. Government Counsel. --------- 1. In these writ petitions, the only grievance raised by the petitioners is that though initially some land was reserved for allotment to the families belonging to Od / Bazigar families who migrated from Pakistan vide Annex.2 dated 22.5.1997 but later on vide Annex.9 dated 16.8.2005 it was decided by the State Government that such families may be rehabilitated only in the land under II Phase of Indira Gandhi Canal Pariyojna. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has pointed out that again vide Annexure R/1 dated 12.9.2006 though the State Government has decided that only the land reserved for such Od/ Bazigar families will be allotted to them, however, Annex.9 dated 16.8.2005 was not withdrawn. 1. CW-3116/2006 - Raj Nahar Shramik Sangthan Vs. State & Ors. 2. NO.1299/2006 - Jaisalmer Zila OD Samaj Vikas Sansthan Vs. State & Ors. : Order dt.20.5.08 2/2 3. Having heard learned counsels, this Court is of the opinion that it is absolutely for the competent authority of the State Government to decide where the petitioners or its like, if they have to be rehabilitated, the place where they have to be rehabilitated and it does not lie within the domain of this Court to interfere in such matters. Since the matter pertains to rehabilitation of such families, who have migrated from Pakistan and reservation of land in Border area which is a sensitive issue, it is not for the Court to interfere with such matters at all and it is left for the respondent authorities to consider these cases of petitioners individually on their own individual merit in accordance with law. 4. These writ petitions are found to be devoid of merit and same are accordingly dismissed. [ DR. VINEET KOTHARI ], J. item No.50-51 babulal/-