& HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETlTlQN (S) NO.4705 OF 2008 PETITIQNE R RESPDNDENTS Awadhesh Gupta, son of Late Shri Ramgopa! Gupta, aged about 40 years, Assistant Grade-III, Ekikrit Ba! Vikas Pariyojana Sarangarh, Di5trict Raigarh (CG), Rio Baniyapara, Sarangarh, District Raigarh (CG). Versus The State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Woman Child Deveiopment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). Under Secretary, Department of Woman Child Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(CG). The Conector, Raigarh, District Raigarh (CG). District Program Officer, Woman Child Development, Raigarh, District Raigarh (CG). Project Ofncer, ICDS, Sarangarh, Dist. Raigarh (CG). (Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Raghvendra Pradhan, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State. ORAL oRDER (Passed on this 27‘“ day of August, 2003) With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the petition is heard hnalty. 2) Learned counsel. appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press this petition on merits, at this stage. However, the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation before the concerned authorities within a period of three days and the same may be directed to be considered and decided, in accordance with law, within the prescribed tme. 3) Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that if the representation is made, the same shall be considered and decided by i /$/ ‘ 6% the cncerned authority, in accordance with raw, on its own merits, withi a period of two weeks from the date of receipf of the representation. 4) Learned counsel for the State further sumits that no coercive eteps shaii be taken againet the titioner, tiii the dieposal of the representation. 5) l hope and truet that the State Gvernment shaii examine the representation objectiveiy in accordance with iaw and guidelines. issued by th Government time to time. - 6) in view of the foregoing, he petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. 7) Consequently, l.A.No.1/2008 also stands disposed of. Sdl — a Satish K. Agnmw‘ Jdg ue ? n o b pe o e t