:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 126 OF 2008 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 47 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4482 OF 2006 Sakhar Kamgar Sabha ..Applicant Vs. 1. Dudhganga Vedganga and anr. ..Respondents Ms. Madhavi Tavanandi for applicant. Mr. M.S. Topkar for respondent no.1. Mr. P.P. Chavan for respondent no.2. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & D.B. BHOSALE,JJ. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & D.B. BHOSALE,JJ. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & D.B. BHOSALE,JJ. Dated: July 18, 2008. Dated: July 18, 2008. Dated: July 18, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. We have heard the learned counsel for the respective parties and the L.P.A. arises from an interlocutory order passed by the Single Bench in Writ Petition No. 4482 of 2006 on 22/11/2006. While granting Rule, execution of the impugned order was stayed subject to the condition that the entire amount as directed by the Industrial Court would be deposited within a period of 12 weeks. The appellant-Karkhana was aggrieved on the issue of interest as granted by :2: the Industrial Court. 2. On 7/3/2007 a Division Bench in this LPA disposed off Civil Application No. 17 of 2007 by directing interim relief in terms of prayer clause (a) on the condition that the entire originally deducted amount be deposited and the said deposit has already been made and what remains is the interest component which has not yet been deposited. 3. We are also informed that the respondent no.2 has been registered as the representative Union in place of respondent no.1 and, therefore, the prayer for withdrawal of the deposited amount by respondent no.1 cannot be considered during the pendency of Writ Petition No. 4482 of 2006. 4. Hence, Civil Application No. 126 of 2008 stands rejected. (D.B. Bhosale, J.) (D.B. Bhosale, J.) (D.B. Bhosale, J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.)