1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1642 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.180 OF 1995 Vikas Motiram Raut & anr. ..Plaintiffs V/s. State Bank of India & ors ..Defendants Ms.Kumud Bhatia, Advocate, for Plaintiffs Mr.Hemant Ghadigaonkar i/b.M.J.Jamdar, Advocate, for Defendant Nos.2 & 3 CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J 28TH JANUARY, 2008 P.C. . The Chamber Summons has been directed against Defendant Nos.1 to 3 to produce the original documents mentioned in the list of documents annexed at Schedule 'A' to the Chamber Summons. Defendant Nos.2 & 3 have filed their reply stating that the documents are not in their possession. The documents are stated to be in the possession of the First Defendant. The First Defendant has not appeared before the Court despite service of the Chamber Summons. The Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause 2 (a) as against Defendant No.1 subject to all just exceptions in regard to relevance and admissibility. In so far as prayer clause (b) is concerned, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the defendants does not press the same at this stage since the Plaintiff desires to take appropriate proceedings.