IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3136 of 2010 BACHCHA PANDEY . Versus AJAY BASUDAV NAYAK & ORS. . ----------- 4. 04.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The order on the writ petition is acknowledged to have been affirmed by the Supreme Court. The statement made in Paragraph-5 of the supplementary show cause filed today by the Under Secretary (Management) Water Resources Department, Shree Jaydeo Prasad is accepted as an undertaking by him and an assurance made in a judicial proceeding for compliance of the order by payment of the consequential benefits. The Court rejects the prayer for three months time on an undertaking and assurance given to comply the order within three weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, failing which the questions of violation of an undertaking and assurance made in a judicial proceeding may arise for consideration. The application stands disposed. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)