RFA No.1927 of 2003 (O&M) -1- In the Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh. Date of decision:20.02.2008. Sukhdev Singh and others ... Appellants Versus State of Punjab and another .... Respondents Present: Mr.Sher Singh Rathore, Advocate, for the appellants. None for the respondents. - PERMOD KOHLI, J. (Oral): Heard the learned counsel for the appellants. The present appeal arises out of the land acquisition proceedings notified vide notification dated 11.11.1993 for the land situated at village Sohana. A number of references came to be made before the learned Additional District Judge, Rupnagar. These references were decided in various cases and a number of Regular First Appeals came to be filed before this Court relating to the aforesaid acquisition. Regular First Appeal No.2322 of 1998 came to be disposed of by this Court vide judgment dated 23.08.2006, wherein the following order is passed:- “For the reasons recorded above, appeals being RFA Nos.2322 and 3898 of 1998, 4621 of 2001 and 2232 of 2004 filed by the appellant-land- RFA No.1927 of 2003 (O&M) -2- owners for enhancement of compensation are partly allowed by enhancing the amount of compensation to Rs.08 lacs per acre instead of Rs.6,45,000/- per acre awarded by the Additional District Judge, Ropar, alongwith all the statutory benefits available under the Act as awarded by the Additional District judge, Ropar. The appellants/land-owners are directed to pay the court fee, if not paid earlier, on the enhanced amount of compensation, within three months from today to claim the enhanced amount of compensation. Appeal being RFA No.2559 of 1998 filed by the State of Punjab for setting aside the award passed by Additional District Judge, Rupnagar, fails and is hereby dismissed.” The present appeal also relate to the same acquisition and is covered by the aforesaid judgment. This appeal is disposed of in terms of the judgment mentioned above. 20.02.2008. (PERMOD KOHLI) BLS JUDGE Note: Whether to be referred to the Reporter? NO