rp a IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1586 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO.1586 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO.1586 OF 2006 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO. 392 OF 2006 NO. 392 OF 2006 NO. 392 OF 2006 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.4972 OF 1999 NO.4972 OF 1999 NO.4972 OF 1999 Suresh Shantaram Mohite .. Appellant. V/s. Shantaram S. Mohite .. Respondent. Mr.B.A.Bhakad with S.A.Tawate for the Appellant. None for Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. V.MOHTA, JJ. V.MOHTA, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 11th DECEMBER, 2007. : 11th DECEMBER, 2007. : 11th DECEMBER, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. :- :- :- . Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant. None appeared for the Respondents though served. The learned Counsel for the Appellant undertakes to file an affidavit of service within one week from today. Perused the Notice of Motion and affidavit in support thereof For the reasons stated therein especially in paragraph 6 to 12 of the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay in filing the above appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)