IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 8TH OCTOBER 2010 / 16TH ASWINA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 1256 of 2010(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.15131/2010 Dated 22/06/2009 .................... PETITIONER: PETITIONER -------------------------------------- A.R.NOUSHAD, AGED 41 YEARS,S/O.ADBUL RAHUMAN, R/AT CHANDRAN VILAYIL VEEDU, MEL-VETTOOR, VARKALA, CHIRAYINKEEZHU TALUK, TVM. DIST.,MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S.DEVI SCANS PVT.LTD.,KUMARAPURAM,TVM. DT.,REP.BY P/AT HOLDER A.R.AZAD, AGED 49,S/O.ABDUL RAHUMAN,R/AT F.N.NIVAS,MEL-VETTOOR,CHIRAYINKEEZHU BY ADV. MR. NAGARAJ NARAYANAN MR. RAJAN VELLOTH MR. SAIJO HASSAN MR. BENOJ C AUGUSTIN MR. PRATHAP PILLAI MR. RAFEEK V.K. RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. K.C.CHARMANA, (AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) AUTHORISED OFFICER, UNION BANK OF INDIA, REGIONAL OFFICE, UNION BANK BHAVAN, M.G.ROAD, STATUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. A.NARAYANANKUTTY, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O.A.S.NAIR, CHIEF MANAGER, UNION BANK OF INDIA, KARAMANA BRANCH, KARAMANA (PO), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 002. BY ADV. MR. A.S.P. KURUP THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ COC (C) No. 1256 OF 2010 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 8th day of October, 2010 JUDGMENT This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner stating that in spite of satisfying the entire liability, as directed in the verdict dated 22.06.2009 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 15131 of 2010, the title deeds of the petitioner have not been released and that the respondent Bank is demanding further amounts. 2. It is very much relevant to note that, the prayer now made through the contempt petition, to have the title deeds of the petitioner released does not find a place in the judgment. This being the position, this Court finds it difficult to entertain the contempt matter. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks for permission of this Court to withdraw the contempt matter, with liberty to pursue other appropriate remedy. Permission is granted. The Contempt of Court case is dismissed as withdrawn, reserving the rights and liberties of the petitioner as above. P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE kmd