^5a^*s^^:pl ^AE£i&B"eaai^^r^-'4^ArtrTflr-^-r3t^J'SE&B^ ,^—3E4.Bils,,.>-a «=.-lB &> IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPIIA Writ Petition N0. i°S>-S /2006 Service matter PETITIONER ...• ..••»v^-' 3<^". w ./' ^^%//" 7?'--'"' ^?- ^"'"..f" .> ^' s- ^^" RESPONDENTS 1. '---JO^^ .P.^^a/( ^/.3/Ok - CEERE to A. G. BILASPtjtg Shyam Ratan Ratre. --i'^Aged about 36 years ^ S/o. Shri Sadhram Ratre Working as Waterman ^ Post Matric Balak Chhatrawas Masturi, Bilaspur, Distt Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh -Through Secretary Schedule Tribe, Schedule Caste, OBC & Minority Welfare & Development Mantralaya D.K.S, Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 's.. t^/"[ ^'\ '%. P%!^^*B -j't;l'l°""S>< !3-.^, .^2. 3. ^ 4. ^ "^. \ •S'.Y 3f •fe,. 'V1- ''%.>.' "aSiB^K.?-^."--' Commissioner Tribal Welfare & Development Raipur (C.G.) The Collector (Tribal Welfare Development) District Bilaspur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner (Tribal Welfare Development) District Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227_0j: CONST1TUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER^SyiTABLE WRIT OR WRITS ORDER OR ORDERS DIRECTlQNORJURECTtONS. W! 029 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J WRILPETITiONNQ,1093 OF 2006 GQWRI Petitioner Respondents Shyam Ratan Ratre Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others Present :- Shri Gautam Khetrapal, counse! for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S. Moorthy, Dy. Advocate Generalwith Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. ORDER (Passedon 24"' March, 2006) in this petition, the petitioner seeks a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to implement the benefitof the revised 5th pay scale w.e.f. 1-1-1996 with interest Learned counsei for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has atready made representation ttirough union to respondent No.2. Leamed counsel confines his prayer to consideratton of the petitioner's representation already made through union to respondent No.2. Learned counsei appearing for the respondente have no objectlon. Accordingly, respondent No.2 is direcised to consider the representation of the petitioner, if any, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipvproductron of a copy of this order in accordance with law. For the reasons stated above, the petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Sa^s^" ' lud^