IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P(T) No. 5202 of 2008. Decided on: 31st August, 2010. Raj Kumari and another. …Petitioners. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioners. : Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. Onkar Jairath, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that his clients have made representations for the redressal of their grievance to the competent authority. However, the same have not been decided till date. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the Principal Secretary (Education) to decide the pending representations made by the petitioners by passing speaking orders within a period of ten weeks after the receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that it case the representations of the petitioners are accepted, they shall be entitled to all the consequential benefits. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge August 31, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?