IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16810 of 2008 Ravindra Yadav, Son of Duraki Yadav of village- Mahisautha, P.S. Nanpur, District-Sitamarhi……………………………..………Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary. 2. The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Sitamarhi. 3. District Disaster Management Officer, District-Sitamarhi. 4. Sub Divisional Officer, Pupri, District-Sitamarhi. 5. Circle Officer, Bhokhara, District-Sitamarhi. 6. Block Development Officer, Block-Bokhara, District-Sitamarhi. 7. Yogendra Chaudhary, Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Maksuddanpur Dumari @ Mahisautha, P.S. Nanpur, District- Sitamarhi. 8. Ramashish Sahni, Son of Khelawan Sahni, Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj Makshudanpur Dumari @ Mahisautha, P.S. Nanpur, District- Sitamarhi. 9. Md. Aminur Rahman, Son of Mazibul Rahman, Up-Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj Makshuddanpur Dumari @ Mahisautha, P.S.Nanpur, District-Sitamarhi. 10. Nand Kumar Yadav, Son of Late Ram Bilash Rai (Block President of RJD), Village-Dasai Tola, P.S.Nanpur, District-Sitamarhi. 11. Soun Pathak, Son of Raj Kumar Pathak, village- Samar, P.S. Nanpur, District-Sitamarhi. 12. Digvijay Narayan Yadav, Son of Indradeo Yadav, Village-Mahisautha, P.S. Nanpur, District-Sitamarhi. 13. Suresh Raj, Son of Prabhu Rai, Village- Bathaul, P.S. Nanpur, District-Sitamarhi. 14. Butan Sahni, Son of Late Taagan Sahni, Village- Samar, P.S. Nanpur, District-Sitamarhi……………………………………..…Respondents. 3. 05.09.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The present writ application has been filed for a direction to the respondent authorities to conduct an enquiry for misappropriation of funds by the Mukhiya, Panchayat Secretary and members of Monitoring Committee of Gram Panchayat Raj Maksuddanpur Dumari @ 2 Mahisautha Block Bokhara, in the district of Sitamarhi. The counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent nos. 2 to 6 whereby it has been pleaded that during enquiry no misappropriation has been found, moreover, the petitioner has not referred any specific case of misappropriation. This Court finds no merit in the writ application. Accordingly, it is dismissed. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)