W.P. No. 212 of 2004 (S/B) Hon. V.S. Sirpurkar, C.J. Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard Mr. S.S. Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K.P. Upadhyaya, learned Brief Holder for the State. Mr. S.S. Yadav, learned counsel points out that, now, the petitioner has been allowed to join in the State of U.P. and she has joined also. In that view, according to him, the writ petition has become infructuous. However, the learned counsel says that there are some arrears, which are to be paid, for which, liberty is given to the petitioner to make representations. If the representations are so made, they shall be dealt with as expeditiously as possible. With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. (RT, J.) (VSS, C.J.) 23.11.2004 23.11.2004 G