IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.20565 of 2010 SMT.JAYANTI DEVI W/O Late Dr. Shyama Nand Mallik R/o Damuchak, behind S.D.O. Quarter P.S. –Kazi Mohammadpur, District- Muzaffarpur, husband of petitioner was working as Reader, Department of Zoology.L.S. College, Muzaffarpur -------- Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR represented through Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development Department( Higher Education), Bihar,Patna 2. The Vice- Chancellor, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur. 3. The Registrar, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur 4. The Finance Officer, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur 5. The Principal, L.S. College, Muzaffarpur -------------------- Respondents. ----------- 02 21-12-2010 Heard Sri Manoj Kumar Manoj, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel appearing on behalf of B.R.A. Bihar University, i.e. Respondent nos.2 to 4 and Sri Amrendra Kumar, learned A.C. to A.A.G. No.4. The petitioner’s husband retired as Reader, Zoology Department from L.S. College, Muzaffarpur under B.R.A. Bihar University. After retirement, he died on 16.1.2003. The petitioner has claimed that even after expiry of 8 years from the date of retirement of her husband and 7 years from the date of death of her husband, she has not received payment of total gratuity amount, Provident Fund, arrears of Group Insurance, arrears of salary of revised U.G.C. scale from 1.1.1996 to 30.6.2002 and other benefits including the revised family pension. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation before the respondent no.2, the Vice-Chancellor, 2 Bhim Rao Ambedkar Bihar University within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed within the aforesaid time, Respondent no.2 is directed to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law for redressal of all the grievances of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of filing of the representation. In case of refusal, Respondent no.2 is directed to pass a speaking order within the aforesaid time. With above observation and direction, the petition stands disposed of. It is made clear that if the claim of the petitioner is found to be genuine, the petitioner will be entitled to get statutory interest. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)