IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 24TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA 1931 CRL.A.No. 2487 of 2009() ------------------------ MC.97/2008 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, NADAPURAM .................... APPELLANT(S): PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS/RESPONDENT ----------------------------------------------- 1. PUTHENPURAYIL SULEKHA, W/O. ABDULLA, THUNERY AMSOM, MUDAVANTHERY DESOM. 2. PUTHENPURAYIL MAMI, W/O PAKRANKUTTY, THUNERY AMSOM, MUDAVANTHERY DESOM. BY ADV. SRI.ZUBAIR PULIKKOOL RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER ------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSEUCTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.M.NAZAR THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Crl.Appeal.No.2487 of 2009 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 24th day of November, 2009 JUDGMENT This is an appeal filed under Section 449 Cr.P.C against the order dated 28.2.2009 passed by the J.F.C.M, Nadapuram in M.C.No.97 of 2008 under Section 446 Cr.P.C against the two sureties. By virtue of Section 449 Cr.P.C an appeal from the order passed by the Magistrate will lie only to the Sessions Court. Hence, this appeal filed in this Court is incompetent. The appeal memorandum shall be returned to the appellant for presentation before the proper court which has jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. Dated this the 24th day of November, 2009. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE sj