IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50161 of 2007 RAJ KAMAL PASWAN @ KAMAL PASWAN & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04/ 13.08.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are accused for an offence under Sections 341, 323, 386, 307, 504, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. It is submitted that the petitioner no.1 is an Advocate practicing in the Sasaram Court and the petitioner no.2 is a Judicial Officer (trainee), Aurangabad. It is further submitted that on the alleged date of occurrence the petitioner no.1 at Sasaram practicing an Advocate and petitioner no.2 came to Patna on 31.7.2007 for his interview of 1.8.2007 and he appeared in the interview and later on, selected for his appointment and petitioner joined his service. It is further submitted that the case has been lodged for ulterior purposes on account of pending differences since the informant is happens to be the cousin of these petitioners. Considering the above, it is directed that in the - 2 - event of arrest or surrender, the petitioners Raj Kumar Paswan and Rajesh Paswan be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sasaram Town P.S. Case No. 339 of 2007, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. DKS/ (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J)