IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35856 of 2011 Mamta Devi wife of Purusottum Pathak, Resident of village-Kalai, P.S.-Harpur, District- Munger. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 24.10.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the complainant and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with a case in which cognizance for the offence punishable under sections 148, 120B and 466 of the Indian Penal Code has been taken. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is a lady. The case arises out of a compliant. The petitioner was not party in Title Suit No.18 of 2009. There was no occasion for the petitioner after appearance of the defendants to change original plaint of Title Suit No.18 of 2009 from the suit record since the said suit was simply a partition suit filed by the husband of the petitioner. The custodian of the case record of the court is officials of the civil court. It is beyond imagination that the petitioner who is a house wife could have any access to the records of the case. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and she has got roots in the society and there is no likelihood to abscond and tamper with the evidence. The parties are agnates and dispute relating to partition is going on between them. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, named above in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of 2 six weeks from the date of receipt/communication of the order be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.K.Singh, learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Munger in connection with Complaint Case No.806 (C) of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Md.S. ( Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)