HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKUR AND HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED W.A.No.142 of 2010 JUDGMENT(Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Madan B. Lokur) 1. The appellant is aggrieved by an order dated 20.01.2009 passed in W.P.No.8982 of 2005. 2. According to the appellant, some admitted amount is due from the respondents for execution of contractual work. However, according to the respondents, the appellant has not produced the relevant documents for making payment including minute books etc., 3. On the basis of these averments, the learned single Judge was of the view that since disputed questions of fact arise with regard to the execution of work by the appellant, the appropriate remedy would be to approach a civil Court for relief. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant placed reliance on G. RAJENDER REDDY AND COMPANY, HYDERABAD v. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH[1] to contend that even under circumstances of this nature a writ petition is maintainable. 5. We have gone through the aforesaid judgment and find that in that case there was no dispute about the execution of the contract. It is under those circumstances that the writ petition was entertained. That case is clearly distinguishable. 6. There is no merit in the writ appeal and hence, dismissed. 7. Miscellaneous Application also stands dismissed. ____________________ MADAN B. LOKUR, CJ ____________________ GHULAM MOHAMMAD, J Date:16.11.2011 Sj W.A.No.142 of 2010 Page 2 of 1 [1] 2002(4) ALD 746 (DB) W.A.No.142 of 2010 Page 1 of 1