fe' ^ :i!VA^1MIWrr ^'^LF.-'/\<^.^r'-,.^G'^-C^:>^l.^ •-..?/•.'.•;^;;>^^.^y^'''^'^A.'..'<;..^-?;./^./-''1-.^' IN THB HIGH COURT OF JUDIC&T1S.IRB; AT BI&i^] WRrr PETITION N0. 4'C'8'-?- ©P-2003/ PETITIQNBRS x^ ^, SCW/ .^.••"^ / »^-y.y 7'y^7 S-Sh' ..' s? -^ ^-w' //^ f/^ 1. Kumari Sona, daughter of late Ramesh.aged about 15 years. 2. ISaa Dutt.son of late Ramesh aged about 12 years, through their guardian Santu(Grand father) of thepetitioners.resident of SS;niehri pada.o.Bilaspur, (C.G.) 3. Santu, ~son o£ Eyare Lal. aged about 62 years, resident of Saniehri padao.Bilaspur,(C.G.) '.^&'"' • ' ;''- ' ' • B KM ea v^' <~»$ ^' VERS.US. KBSSS0 tSySS> 1. Tbe Municipal Corporation, •Bilaspur.felarough its _ ' Gcmmlssioner.B.tlaspur, (C.s.) 2, The.eommissioner, MuaicApal Corporatlon, , B.llaspur, (C.G. ) WRIT PETITION Uia®R:>^KT3:CLES-226/227_0?THE GomTITUT^N OP INBIS.. • - .M K !i»:i1 BS I^S;i': .S^^f Ksf!s KB3 -h XI-HC-22 ssi^r'ro •^s' ^p ^:5?'?'<ltA<"f<sl;~9nl<'l^?i?'fto*Wli<- aiff^' 'qt^ ^^^^.. 1<;><CTI**<1<»)- -g^ 200^ fa^s* ^i^^^t^ti^d 08.4.2004 Shri Malay Kuiaar Bhadu|'i, counsel for fhe peUtioner. he4ring is allowed. AppUcation for ui^ent Heard. The father of petitioners as Safai Karmachan. He died 12.2.199.2 leavmgbehmd the p| of ttie petitioners is fhat the^j (Amiexure P-2) before fhe res^ disburseiaent of dues/deafti| petitioners have iiot been paid] years. It is stated1tti.at several fhe respondents, but fhe respQJ f^ie claim of the petilioners reason/ground withlield fhe counsel for fhe rpetitioner pri respondents to release fhe petitioners fortliwifh. Haviag considered and v4 nierits of fhe case, in the opini<l served if a direction is given representation afresh raisiag authority of fhe respondents this order, withia 15 days,aa( fhe coinpetent authority of the ^ the sanie without. aiiv- fiictlierl ^hNfe^t^ f^iwS ^ ;^^";8^Es^ ^rs^pT-sn^ ^io. 1 & 2 aamely Ramesh was serving Iduriiig the course :of employment on stitioners as legal heirs. The grievanGe suUBaitted Guardiauship Certificate tondents in the same vear regardias claim of fh.e deceased, but the the amoiuit even after a lapse of 12 r^presentations have been subiiutted to bdent authorities Uave aot considered pll date giid without assigning aay ;laun of tbe petitioners. Leanied ys for a direction coiiunandin^g the deafh. claim./dues payable to the v^ifhout expressing aay opinioa on the i<lii of ttus Court, ends ofjusti.ee wUl be |to fh.e petitioner to inake a detaaed 1|ietr grievances before fhe coiapetent long \vith a copy of fhe petition and B, on such representation beiag filed, ispondents shall consider aad decide xlela^^oiL-its .Oimn.^iiiertts aS'^eariy as t«^3^ w^ :;£'': X2-H8.® !5^ttiS|US|iBiBi'[isy*sras<- s91%%W , few'SH&l sffiw^iffin fimvn ww .....,^,^.Ei.o:.4t:QS;; WT> iai^in g^iiOKflftn possible preferably witliin. a (YJU^ ®wusLsy^ * representation/ It is made clcar mlonth t petitioners raay avail fhe reiaedj Wifh the aforesaid of. i C.C. as perrules. wl'qtCTflll-mlff^ "^ ^?t^^R ^silniiatlSa froin fhe date 6f reeeipt of fhe |hat ifaay grievaace stiU reruauis, the under the law. ' i, this: petitioa stands disposed obser+ations Itil ..^!^^;