[^.\^r^ IN THE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETCTCON (S) NO..°<?...1.1/2910/^°(/ PETETIONER /' Deepak Kumar Patel, Son of late Ravilal Patel, aged 26 years, Shiksha Karmi Grade-111, Primary School Chhuiyapali, Tahsil Saraipali, R/o. Village Kanwarpali, Post Navagarh, District Mahasamund (C.G.) VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.(5.), 2. The Collector, Mahasamund, Distnct - Mahasamund (C.6.), 3. Tahsildar, Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.6.), 4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Saraipali, District - Mahasamund (C.6.), WRIT PETCTEON UNDER ARTCCLE 226 OF THE COUNSTCTUTEON OF INDIA. The petitioner above-named most respectfully submit as under: 1, PAKTLCULARS OF THE PETETEONERS: As mentioned in the cause title above. 2. MRTECULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS ,^^.- ^-s^" .^•".<3^y>" .^y>s ^y^ ^y 'l^- SD^I^iI k-f '(T<TT 3n^Tst>*1 ^ >s ^wwi *^ra» ^ST'<i|ijicit|, siTlly'16, f°<dl'ytl,< -_..^..^.'(?-.CSa2.'-A-6 • a^->fW " ••^200 Sf^lJ^^ ('^t^^fl) ^nw^iftgsn^'i SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan hrivastava. .1. 13-05-201t Shri R.S. Patei, counsel ior the Shri N. Naha Roy, Panel Lawye)' Heard. The petitioner has fited thte Assistant Teaoher who died whiie compassionate appointment and he Shiksha Karmi Grade-lii. The petttione|- as Assistant Grade - III according to th^ Leamed State counsel submittfed given an opportunity of filing the d^t respondent authority, which may be ^t with iaw. Having considered and withoul case, in the opinion of this Court, ends| to the petitioner to make a detailed competent respondent authority alon^ within six weeks from today, arri on respondent authority shall decide the as early as possible preferably within ^ of the representation. If any grievan4i remedy available under the law. With the aforesaid observation,| Certified copy as per ruies. ^i'ptf?1'ift'i 'WTdf ^f 'fe1^ <^q^.l< ^affin sii^i betitioner. /el-fortheState. [^etition on the ground that he is a ward of |in sen/ice. He moved an appiioation for |ias been given appointment on the post of submitted that he is entltled to be appointed T^ policy. that for the present, the petitioner may t® i^tailed representation befere the competent itonsidered on its own merits, in accordance expressing any opinion on the merits of the lofjustice wiit be served, if a direction is given r^presentation raising his griewince before the with a copy of the petition and this order, r^iresentation being ffled, the competent on its own merits in acoocdance with taw period of four months from the date or receipt te stiil remains, the petitioner may avaii the jthis petition standsdisposed of. sUch aame ManmdraMohanShrivastava < Judge IB