FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL W.P. NOS.1532 & 1533 OF 2006 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, office Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ms.Manorama & Mohanty i/b S.R.Srivastava & Co. for Petitioner Mr.R.S.Mishra i/b L.C.Tolat and Co. for Respondent no.1 Mr.A.S.Shitole, A.P.P. for State CORAM:SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM:SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM:SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE :FEBRUARY 23, 2007 DATE :FEBRUARY 23, 2007 DATE :FEBRUARY 23, 2007 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner-original accused, learned counsel for the respondent no.1-original complainant. 2. The learned counsel for the parties state that the disputes between the contesting parties have been referred to arbitration. Hence, they have prayed that the proceedings before the trial Court in Case No.642/SS/2005 and 643/SS/2005 which are under Sections 138 of N.I.Act and pending before the learned Addl.Chief Metropolitan Magistrate 2nd Court, Mazgaon, Mumbai, be stayed till the arbitration proceedings are concluded. In this view of the matter, the proceedings before the trial Court in both the said cases are stayed till the arbitration proceedings are disposed of. With above direction, writ petitions are disposed of. However, liberty is granted to the parties to prefer fresh writ petitions if felt necessary after the arbitration proceedings are concluded. . Petitions are disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]