IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27769 of 2009 GHANSHYAM YADAV & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 03-11-2009 Leave is sought to withdraw the prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner no.2. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail is dismissed as withdrawn on his behalf. The petitioners 1,3, 4 and 5 apprehend arrest in a police case under section 354 and other provisions of the Penal Code and section 3/4 of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe ( Prevention of Atrocities ) Act. The submission is that the allegations are generalized under the latter Act against all of them. Considering the nature of allegation against petitioner no.5 vis a vis the informant, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. Let the petitioners no. 1,3 and 4, namely, Ghanshyam Yadav, Pawan Yadav and Dilo Yadav surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20, 000/- (Twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka ( Barahat) P.S. Case No. 157 of 2009 in connection with subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) of - 2 - the Cr.P.C. Any application for regular bail on behalf of petitioner no. 5 shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. ( Navin Sinha, J ) BTiwary/