IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35511 of 2010 SHIV SHANKAR DIXIT @ KALLU Versus STATE OF BIHAR For the petitioner: Mr. Madhurendra Kumar, Adv. For the Union of India: Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, Adv. C.G.C. ----------- 2 28.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for Union of India. Admittedly, at the time of alleged recovery, the petitioner was remained on driving seat and it is alleged that near about 2230 kgs of ganja was recovered from the vehicle which was being driven by the petitioner. Although learned counsel for the petitioner tried to convince the court about the innocence of the petitioner arguing that mandatory provisions of NDPS Act have been violated by the Seizing authority but I am at all not convinced with the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner. Considering the recovery of huge quantity of Ganja as well as the role played by the petitioner in the alleged crime, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. PN/AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)