IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 6923 of 2008 Between: Sri Said Trade Fare Exhibition Society, R/o. D.No.13/3/209 (Upstairs), Srinivasa Nagar, Anantapur, Rep. by its Secretary R.S. Raghu Prasad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep. by its Commissioner, Hyderabad. 2 The Manager, Bhuvaneswari Trade Fair and Sree Amarnathji Yatra Darshan and Exhibition Fair, Huda Grounds, Trunk Road, Kukatpally, Hyderabad. 3 B. Srinivas, R/o. D.No.13/531-14, Near Prasad English Medium School, Tata nagar, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in allowing the 2nd and 3rd respondents to conduct the exhibition in the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Ground at Trank Parking Road, Kukatpally without inviting tenders or without considering the petitioners request for grant of permission to conduct exhibition in the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Ground at Trank Parking Road, Kukatpally as illega, arbitrary and contrary to the rules of the Municipal Corporation Act and in violation of Art.14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct teh 1st respondent not to allow the respondents 2 and 3 to conduct the exhibition in the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Ground at Trank Parking Road, Kukatpally in the interest of Justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: (SC FOR MCH CIRCLES 3&5)KALPANA EKBOTE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 6923 of 2008 ORDER: Sri M. Ramarao, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the subject matter of the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Hence the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. ------------------------- SRI T.G.K, J. 15.12.2008 kvsn