-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO. 126 OF 2006 Samit Shridhar Vishwasrao ... Petitioner Versus Union of India and Ors. ... Respondents. Mr. J.S. Kini for the petitioner. Mr. Amjad Sayyed, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent No.1. Mr. H.D. Buch with Ms. Nina B. Dholakia for respondent Nos. 2 to 4. CORAM: KSHITIJ R. VYAS, C.J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE: MARCH 01 , 2006 . P.C. The petitioner has challenged the order of deputation dated 30th December, 2005, at Exhibit-N to the petition. The said order of deputation asking the petitioner to report to the New Delhi Office is challenged on various grounds including the ground of mala fides. However, it is not necessary for us to go into the same as, Mr. H.D. Buch, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 2 to 4, makes a statement that the order of deputation is not a permanent one and the respondents are not desirous of transferring the petitioner on a long-term basis. According to the learned counsel, the petitioner may -2- be kept at Delhi initially for a period of three months. However, the period can be extended some time thereafter. In view of this statement, Mr. Kini, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, after taking instructions from the petitioner, who is present in the Court, states that the petitioner shall report at New Delhi office within a week from today. The petitioner unconditionally withdraws the allegations of mala fide made in the petition. In view of this, nothing further needs to be done in the matter. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.