IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Review No.134 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10787 of 2010 ====================================================== Archana Kumari .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bajarangi Lal For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prashant Pratap GP6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 3 19-09-2012 Petitioner has brought on record Annexure 11 and 12 in a supplementary affidavit filed today. The ground for filing review against the order dated 18.3.2011 passed in CWJC No. 10787 of 2010 was the misleading assertion or production of interpolated document before this Court to defeat the claim of the petitioner. The Court dismissed the writ application on the basis of material so produced. However, if on the intervention of the high-ups, a fresh enquiry was taken up by the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Patna and based on the outcome of such an enquiry if a direction has been issued in favour of the petitioner, the dismissal of the writ application will not come in the way of enforcement or implementation of the direction or order contained Patna High Court C. REV. No.134 of 2011 (3) dt.19-09-2012 2 / 2 2 in Anneuxre-12, which is a separate adjudication altogether based on the ground reality after re-verification. In view of the same, there may not be an occasion to review the earlier order but it is clarified that the order passed in the earlier writ will not come in the way of the petitioner in terms of Annexure-12. Review application is disposed of with above observation. R.K.Pathak/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)