IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34477 of 2011 Rajendra Chaudhary son of Hriday Chaudhary, Resident of village-Sitanabad, P.S.-Bakhtiyarpur, District-Saharsa Versus 1.The State of Bihar 2.Kihsore Chaudhary 3.Suresh Chaudhary 4.Umesh Chaudhary 5.Pappu Chaudhary All sons of Dularchand Chaudhary, resident of village- Sitanabad Chowk Bazar, P.S.-Bakhtiyarpur District-Saharsa ----------- 2. 15.10.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The present application has been filed for quashing of the order dated 9.6.2006 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-V, Saharsa in Criminal Revision No.147 of 2001 whereby the order dated 12.7.2001 passed by Sri V.K.Singh, learned Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in Complaint Case No.1006(C) of 2000 dismissing the complaint petition filed under section 203 of the Cr.P.C. has been confirmed and the criminal revision petition has been dismissed. As a matter of fact, for an occurrence which had taken place in the night intervening between 6/7-11, 1999 a written report was given to the officer-in-charge, Bakhtiyarpur Police Station and on the basis of said written report Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No.202 of 1999 was instituted under sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code and investigation was taken up. The police conducted investigation and on conclusion of investigation submitted final report holding the case to be false and recommended for initiation of 2 a proceeding against the informant under sections 182 and 211 of the Indian Penal Code. The final report so submitted by the police was accepted by the court. It is stated that the petitioner filed a protest petition which was treated as a complaint. The said complaint case was numbered as Complaint Case No.1006C of 2000. The learned Magistrate conducted an enquiry into the complaint. After examining of the complainant on solemn affirmation and after examining the witnesses under section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the learned Magistrate dismissed the complaint by order dated 12.7.2001 in exercise of power conferred upon him under section 203 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. A revision petition was filed thereafter challenging the aforesaid order dated 12.7.2001. The revisional court after hearing the parties dismissed the said revision petition by order dated 9.6.2006. It appears that the present petition has been filed after removing the defects on 12.10.2011 i.e. after more than 5 years of the order passed by the revisional court. After having heard the parties, I find no illegality in the order impugned. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed. Md.S. ( Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)