WP(C) 3072/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA According to the petitioner, the respondent No. 7 being not a re sident of the area in which Chutiakari Borguri Anganbadi Centre is located, her candidature for the assignment of Anganbadi Worker could not have accepted by th e respondent and consequently could not have selected and appointed as Anganbadi Worker for the said center. I have heard Mr. Parag J. Saikia, learned counsel for the petiti oner as well as Mr. B.K. Sarma, learned Standing Counsel, Social Welfare Departm ent. It is submitted that the issue raised in this writ petition is c overed by the judgment and order dated 11.5.2011 passed in a batch of writ petit ions, first one being WP(C) No. 215/2010. Accordingly the directions contained in the said judgment and or der shall also govern the case of the petitioner. The petitioner may obtain a certified copy of this order and fur nish the same to the Director of Social Welfare Department along with the copy o f the writ petition and its enclosure for his necessary follow up action. As pro vided in the said judgment and order no adverse order be passed against the resp ondent No. 7 without hearing her. Be it stated here that the official respondents have not filed a ny counter affidavit. Writ petition is disposed of.