( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.30 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.30 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.30 OF 2008 IN IN IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.24 OF 2008 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.24 OF 2008 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.24 OF 2008 Dr.Kiran Rajaram Vanarase .. Applicant. Versus 1.Swati Prakash Patil & Anr. .. Respondents. Mr.S.R.Mithare i/b.Swapna Kode for the applicant. Ms.Alpa Jhaveri, A.P.P. for respondent No.2-State. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 4th June, 2008. DATED : 4th June, 2008. DATED : 4th June, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Mr.Mithare for the applicant. Ms.Jhaveri, learned A.P.P. for respondent No.2. None for respondent No.1. 2. By this application delay of 12 days is sought to be condoned in filing the revision application. The ground set out not filing the revision application in time is that the Advocate was not available between the period 21.12.2007 to 6.1.2008 being the vacation period. Considering the delay of 12 days, I wish to take a lenient view and the delay is required to be ( 2 ) condoned. Hence the order :- a) Application is granted. Delay is condoned. b) Post the revision for admission on 19.6.2008. (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.)