IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.1410 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision 28.02.2011 Beant Singh ...... Petitioner VERSUS Kewal Singh ...... Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Sukhdip Singh Brar, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J: Aggrieved against the order dated 05.01.2011 (Annexure P-3), passed by the Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kharar, dismissing the application to lead additional evidence, the petitioner-defendant has preferred this petition. Learned counsel wants to produce and prove the copy of the judgment dated 10.02.2004 as well as copy of Civil Suit No.29 dated 04.01.2008. The said judgment is stated to have been passed during the pendency of the present suit. According to him, despite due diligence, the aforesaid two documents could not be produced on record and the same being documentary in nature could not be procured lateron. In these circumstances, it would be expedient in the interest of justice to provide opportunity to the petitioner to tender these documents by way of additional evidence. Resultantly, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to lead additional evidence within three months from today, subject to payment of Rs.5,000/- as costs. This petition is disposed of without issuing notice to the respondent/s with a view to impart complete justice to the parties and to save the huge expenses, which may be incurred by the respondent/s as also in order to avoid unnecessary delay in adjudication of the matter. Still, if dissatisfied, the respondent/s may move this court for recalling this order. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 28.02.2011 mamta-II