. i i ‘ 1‘ H z i v’ , x ' IN p I Ex Q:if; xqoy z .3?‘ ‘x’ I Q‘. Q6"; mE mac pETIiIwER XO "/x" ._-’ oF OF HIGH COURT OF Mimym PmawH m: JABALpm x . PEETI‘IEQN ‘ ’ No.:2°95 pf 1994.} {ii i r cmpumawr :- SMT. Mkwa ‘vEm gGEn ABOUT 31 YEARS m‘Li‘e of Dr. Keshrilal, Verma m, Lecturer if: Library Science Dapartmerit o£ library and Information Sdenée, Ravishankar University I , \A Raipur M.P. ~ vmsus , Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University Raipur, threugh its Registmri; Raipu:( M.P. } 1 Vim Chaacellor, yt . aavisha‘nkar ahuma ‘ University Raipur' M.P. 3. Hen'ple me Chancellor; Pt. RaviShankar Shukla University Raipur M.P., Governor House Bhopal My. PETITION UNDER 2AMICLE3 226/227 OF THE cowiiwul‘xom. INDIA my. {3m Issuvmcx o? mam/9mm m THE uwtmg mkwwms, E'RaaIBITION ETC: AND ma ANY oTHER Es§?aopamwg: ORDERdoRDmS, ‘ DIRECTxoNg DIREcgom . I ”7Q- ix XI-HC-22 @ MW,W,W r w‘PA ”Q. 1—0337j7 ‘ ..................... Wm Hi 200 ................................m ............................. mmmW‘ ‘ mml‘ifg‘zhRER éswm 30.8.2005 Shri A. S. Gahamw, Advocate for the Peu'u'oner. Shri J. R. Velma, Advocate for the Respondents. Heani. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Smt. Kavita Thakur and Dr. Gopal Krishna Tiwari along with the plesent pe11'tio’ncr wem appointed by thé’io‘‘rders dated 29.1. 1994 and 31.1. 1994, in the case of the petitioner for a period of four months. Smt. Kavita Thakur filed M.P.No. 2132/1994 and Dr. Gopal Kn‘s‘hna Tiwan‘ med= M.P.No.‘ 1895/ 1994 before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh seeking a direcn'on agains t the University to appoint them on permanent basis, becau they were appointed against the vacant post on ad-hoc sis for four months. The present petitioner was also apphinted in the same manner. The present petitioner also nled the present pen'tion on 28.5.1994 before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. The High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur by common order dated 10.1.1995 allowed M.P.No. 2132/ 1994 and M.P.No. 1895] 1994 and the petitioners therein were directed to be allowed to continue with all consequential henedts. The present petitioner is similarly situated, however, this matter “‘1” could not be decided earlier. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the I same relief may be granted to the present petitioner also, as (tieW) @ XI—HC-22 EW,W,W mm mm .w.(>~\~05a» Logyf WI 311 200 m giggw WWW r 7" WWI¥W{WTI has been gmnted to Smt. Kavita Thakur and Dr. Gopal Krighna ’I‘lwan Accordingly, the 3pmsent petition is allowed. It is directed that the petitioner be allowed to be continued on the post on mgular basis and he will be enu‘tled to a]1~ ' consequecdal benedts in acconiance‘with law, Cel Liliedsco‘py,’ as per Rules. (@W)