WP(C) 6191/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. S. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. M .K. Mishra, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department. The matter relates to appointment of Additional Teacher on contractual b asis in the four subjects i.e. English, Social Science, Mathematics and General Science. The petitioner is an aspirant for such appointment in the subject of En glish. Her grievance is that the Selection Committee headed by the Chairman i.e. the Deputy Commissioner, Lakhimpur (respondent No.3) committed mistake in award ing marks in respect of her BA examination. According to the petitioner, had she been given correct marks by the Selection Committee on the basis of the marks o btained by her in her BA examination, she would have topped the list of successf ul candidates (Annexure-7). In this connection, the petitioner has made Annexure -8 and 9 representations to the Deputy Commissioner, which have not been dispose d of. In view of the above and as agreed to by the learned counsel for the par ties, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent No.3 i.e. the D eputy Commissioner, Lakhimpur to look into the grievance of the petitioner as na rrated in Annexure-8 and 9 representations dated 25.8.2010 and 04.10.2010. Whate ver may the outcome of the consideration of the said two representations, the pe titioner shall be intimated of the same. Let the entire exercise be carried out as expeditiously as possible but at any rate not latter then 31.12.2010. The petitioner may obtain a certified co py of the order and produce the same before the respondent No.3 for his necessar y follow up action in terms of this order. The writ petition stands disposed of.