HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Wriit Petttion (S) No. 5215 oI2CW PETITIONER : Sudha Shankar Tripathi, aged about 35 years, S/o Ambika Prasad Tripatiu, R/o Village Bariiori, Tahsil Bhara^ur, Thana Janakpur, Distt. Koriya (CG). VERSUS BESPONDEWTS : 1. The State of Chhattis^rh, throu^i Secretaiy, Mimsfay of Panchayat, DKS Bhawan, Raipur. 2. The Collector, Koriya. 3. Chief Executive CMBcer, Janpad Pandiayat, Bharatpur, Distt. Koriya. 4. Sarpaach, Oram Panchayat Bariiwi Tafasil Hiara^ur, Distt. Koriya. 5. Lahnani Raversi, S/o Mohanlal Kol aged about 30 yeus, R/o village BaAori Tahsil Bharatpw, Thana, Jaiidkpur, :, Distt. Koriya. - 6. Sub Divisional OfBcer, ManendragaA, Distt. Surguja. (WRTF PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF IND1A) fSB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. A i'hotri. J.) Present : Shri Parag Kotecha, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri Ashok Swarnakar, Advocate for the respondent No. 4. ORALORDER (Passcd on 3"1 d^ ofJidy, 200S) 1. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. 2. Learaed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner seeks compliance ofthe order dated 29.10.97 (Annexure P/2), passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Manendragarh, District Surguja. 3. Shri Parag Kotecha, learaed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits tfiat the petitioner has no msins to approach higher aathority. He farther submits that despite the order in favour ofthe petiticmer, tfae petitioner has not received any benefits fflowing from the said order dated 29.10.97 (Annexure P/2). He is running finm pillar to post without any relief. 4. Be fhat as it may, the Sub Divisional Officer, Manendragaih, Disteict Koriya, is directed to look into the matter and ensure compliance ofthe order dated 29.10.97, passed by him, ifthere is no other order passed, ttiereafter. 5. With the above direction, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. — Sahu Sd/- SatishK-Agnihotn Judge r