^ »< H!GH COURT OF CHHATTI-SOARH AT B!LASPUR DB: Hon'ble Shri Suni! Kumar Sinha & Hon'ble Shri Radhe Shvam Sharma, Jd. WritAppea! No.298/2011 If AppeEIants/ fRespondent No.11 (Respondent No.2) (Respondent No.3$ (Respondent No.4j 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary Department of School Educatlon DKS Bha'A'an, Raipur (CG) 2. The Director, Lok Shikshan Sanchainalaya, Behind Board of Secondary Education, Pension Bada, Raipur (CG) 3. 4. Vs. Th.e District Education Officer. toucsiion ijiSiriCi Kaigsm (v^) Thea nivi<5Ennai -^Nnprinffanripnl' nl yr^t .• ,^vi .w ,- w Education, Bilaspur Division, Biiaspur (CG) 'e (Pefitioner) [Respondent No.5) 1. Harsh Kumar SaSpath', S/o. Shri Vijay Shankar Satpathi, aged about 53 years, Ad-hoc Upper Division Teacher, Govt. H.S. School, Mahapa!!! District Raigarh (CG) (Presentiy discontinued) R/b. v|j|3Q@ Nsy3Dar3 Post Bsds Haldi. Via Pussour District Raigarh (CG) 2. State Qf Madhya Pradesh, The Secretary, D$k)3ftrn6r!t of Educatlop Vsfiabh oHBWSH, ihopal (MP: Present: Shri UNS Deo, Govt. Advocate forthe State/appellants. ORAL (01.07.2011 ^ The followina order ofthe Courtwas nassed bv Sunil Kumar Ssnha, J. Heard. -SL- 2. The appellants/State has fiied this appeai against order dated January, 2011 passed in W.P. No.2015/2006. 13th r^t i"tK!K8 asaiwsE 3. By the impugned order, the learned Singte Judge has quashed the "rder dated 26.7.2005 (Annxure-P/14), which was passed on the representation made by the respondsnts in pursuance of the earlier order passed in W.P. No. 1529/2005 and has further obseryed in para 4 as fo!lows:- " 4. It is expected t.hat the State shal! consider the cases of both the petitioners in light of the ordsr dated 2.3.1998 passed by the ^.4adhya Pradesh . . Administrative Tribuna!, Jabtapur, in O.A. No. 888/1997, which according to the petitioners, haye attslnsd flnsUty bv the dirsctlon IssuQd bv th's CQurt for nop-coniDlisncs of ths ordsr dated 2.3.1998 to considsr ths rsDrsssntstlQn snd dsclds in sccQrdsncs with law. with'n s Dsriod of $lx wsGks, from ths d2t6 of rscslDt of coov o? thls ordsr." 4. Shri UNS Deo, learnsd Govt. Advocats, after argulnQ fQ.r some time, seeks psr.mission to withdraw this appea'. 5. . Permissio" is granted. 6. Accordingiy, the wrlt appsai is dlsmisssd as withdray.'". Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha *' Judge Sd/- R.S. SHABMA- Judge liir'l