1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 123 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5231 OF 2001 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ This contempt petition is taken up for final hearing. Mr. Sangit, learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement that the caste claim of the petitioner has been decided on 5.7.2004 i.e. after filing this contempt petition. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that since the caste claim of the petitioner has been decided, the petitioner has no further grievance to be agitated in this contempt petition. Learned A.G.P. Mr. Korde, invited my attention to the additional affidavit in reply filed on behalf of respondent No.6 on 20.1.2005, thereby tendering unconditional apology for not deciding the caste claim of the petitioner within stipulated period, as directed by the Division Bench of this Court. In para 3 of the said reply, a statement is made that in future the committee will be more careful in following the order passed by this Court in letter and spirit. In para 2 unconditional apology is tendered for 2 not deciding the caste claim of the petitioner within stipulated period. In the light of the above and in view of the statement of the counsel for the petitioner that no further grievance is left to be agitated, this contempt petition is disposed of. Rule discharged. (S. S. SHINDE. J.) Date:08.10.2010. rlj/