PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ‘ w R CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS 'ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE ORDER l ORDERS, DIRECTION, [ DIRECTIONS. 01) o2) 03) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR c.G. Shim “Ema” WRIT PETITION No. $+3 2. /2004 _ Ashutosh Dixit, aged about 27 years, son of Shn' Kamal Kishore Dixit, resident of Mandir Chowk — Patharia, Mahasamund, Tahsil and Distt. Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS I‘H The State of Chhattisgarh, through, the Secretary, . Department of Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. The District Education Officer, District — Mahasamund (C.G.) The State of Madhya Pradesh, Through : the Secretary, Deptt of Education, Vallabh Bhawan, ‘ Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) The Union of India, through : the Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pension (State Reorganization Cell), III Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan M PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: As per the cause title.‘ PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS: As per the cause title. R PARTICULAR OF ORDERS AGAINST WHICH THE PRESENT PETITION IS BEING MADE arket, New Delhi. g\ IT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 22%? 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION 3“} 53 ivy/”OF ,4 E INDIA 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF w é’ : ép HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON’BLE SHRI SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. WRIT PETITION N0. 3432 of 2004 Pctitioner z Ashutosh Dixit Versus Respondents The State of Chhattisgarh and others Present : Shri Bhaskar Payashi, counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govamment Advocate for the respondents No. 1 and 2. None for the respondent No 3 Shn S K Benwal Standmg counsel for the respondent No 4] Umon of Ind1a ORAL ORDER (20th April, 2006) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the son of Shri Kamal Kishore Dixit, who was working as Assistant Teacher in the Government Higher Secondarv School. Pithora, District-Mahasamund. Shri Kamal Kishore Dixit was died in harness on 20.8. 1998. 2. The petitioner, being dependant-legal heir of the deceased filed an application on 12.5.2000 for compassionate appointment before the District Education Ohicer. The said application was not considered on the ground that the death has occurred > before creation of new State of Chhattisgaih. 3. The State of Chhattisgarh, by its circular dated 2.2.2006, has V directed all the departments to consider cases of all the eligible dependant-legal heir of the employees, who died in harness §’§ between 1.11.1997 to 31.10.2000 for compassionate appointment. 4. Accordingly, the State Government is directed to consider the case of the petitioner as per its own cimular dated 2.2.2006 and also in View of the order dated 20. 12.2005 passed by this Comt in W.P. No. 1322/ 2002 and other connected matters on its own men't, in accordance with law, on such representation being filed by the petitioner. ‘ 5. For the reasons stated-above, the writ petition stands disposed of. N‘o order as to costs. Certined copy as per Rules. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri - Judge