® 0 ? • ^0° IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C]_No.^Q /2011 PETITIONER ^ VERSUS D.K.Jain, S/o Late Shri K.C.Jain, aged about 61 years, Principal, R/o HIG-1 Housing Board Colony, Dharampura, Jagdalpur (C.G.). RESPONDENTS 1. ^ ^%< ,s!$y~ f&^ -,«,.•-' ..^ ^' J»' .»<ia ///< Iridira Gandhi National Open University, Maidan Gadhhi New Delhi 110068, Maidan Gadhhi New Delhi India, Through Vice Chancellor. Regional Director, (I.G.N.O.U.) Regional Centre Rest House and E.M. Office of Sector No.l Shanker Nagar, Raipur, 492007. (C.G.). Assistant Regional Director, (I.G.N.O.U.) Regional Centre Sector No. 1, Shanker Nagar, Raipur, 492007. (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226_OF TH_E CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER : As shown in the cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS : v'. As shown in the cause title. Y ~K:^^iM^^^L^;':.^ Mir^M rTM ?OT r^s: rkuw^TT!?5.^&^^-i • RII ^^is? t—!i°<;r-ii^tt^l!^r\ j \^r ^on^i ', i io\,3ftr^o . oii-rt^ar"wr\ i.a.'RI RESPO ENTS VRIT PETITION,(O.NO. 500 OF 2Q11 D.K. Jain Versus indira Gandhi National Open Uni'v'ersity & Others (Writ Petition under Arocle 228 of the Constitution of india) Singie Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, u. Shri Atanu Ghosh, Adyocats for the petltioner. Shrl Shivendu Pandya, Advocate for the respondents. RlORAL) (Passed Q" this 19"' day ofAugust, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing Tor the petitioner submits that the reiief sought for in the petition has aiready been satisfied by the rssDondents. Thus, nothing suroives for adjudlcation 1n this case, as the c-etition 'nas become infructuous. 2. Accordingly, the writ petltion is dismissed as having become intructuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge '•'•li