IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23517 of 2009 UDAY KUMAR @ UDAY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 16.09.2009 Heard both sides. Sole petitioner has approached this court seeking anticipatory bail in a case instituted under Sections 384 and 406 of the Penal Code. Informant runs a transport company. Certain goods were transported by her from Delhi to Giridih. In mid way at Sasaram the petitioner allegedly got the entire goods unloaded and kept with him. When the informant made an attempt for release he was threatened. The goods were subsequently seized from the possession of the petitioner and released in favour of the informant. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that in fact fare up to Giridih was not paid to the truck owner, and as such, the goods were unloaded at Sasaram. Be that as it may, having regard to the facts appearing from the record including the F.I.R., this court is not persuaded that a good case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. Let petitioner surrender and apply for regular bail before the court below which shall be considered and disposed of on its own merit uninfluenced by the present order passed by 2 this court in the present proceeding. The application is, accordingly, disposed of. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)