1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.682 OF 2011 The State of Maharashtra Applicant versus Vilas Sadhu Mate Respondent Smt.S.S.Shinde, APP for the applicant-State. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 16th August 2011 PC : 1. Heard learned APP for the applicant. Perused the application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Crime No.197 of 2011 registered at Haveli Police Station, District Pune under section 395 of Indian Penal Code. 2. On perusal of the said order and the present application itself it is clear that though there was an allegation of chain snatching during the incident in which some persons were injured, after investigation the Police had found no material to support the allegation of robbery and charge under section 395 of IPC was deleted. After change in the Police Officer in-charge, the matter was sought to be reinvestigated under section 395. Therefore, the respondent sought anticipatory bail apprehending arrest because the complainant in the case appears to be an advocate and relative of a politician. After perusal of the application and the impugned order, I find no substance to interfere in the order. Therefore, the application stands rejected. (J.H.BHATIA, J.)