1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.03.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN W.P.(MD)No.3690 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 Jebamani : Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner, Employment and Training, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai. 2.The Employment Officer, District Employment Office, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Chairman, Teachers Recruitment Board, College Road, Chenani-6. : Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to sponsor the petitioner's name (Registration No.2327/97/92) to the third respondent for the selection for the post of Graduate Assistant and consequently, forbearing the respondents from recruiting Graduate Assistants without including the petitioner's name for the subject of Economics in Social Science under the "Samacheer Kalvi Thittam". For Petitioner : Mr.V.Kannan For Respondents : Mr.N.Ilango Government Advocate ORDER Mr.N.Ilango, learned Government Advocate, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2. Though the petitioner has filed the present Writ petition for a Mandamus, directing the first and second respondents to sponsor his name (Registration No.2327/97/92) to the third respondent for the selection for the post of Graduate Assistant and consequently, forbearing the respondents from recruiting Graduate Assistants without including his name for the subject of Economics in Social Science under the "Samacheer Kalvi Thittam", the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that he is restricting the relief only with regard to the first limb of the prayer that has been sought for in this Writ Petition, viz., a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first and second respondents to sponsor the name of the petitioner to the third respondent. 3. Considering the limited prayer that has been sought for by the petitioner now, without expressing any opinion on the claim made by the petitioner, I direct the first and second respondents to consider the grievance of the petitioner as put forth by him in his representation dated 23.02.2011 on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. The Writ Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Commissioner, Employment and Training, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai. 2.The Employment Officer, District Employment Office, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Chairman, Teachers Recruitment Board, College Road, Chenani-6. +1cc to Mr.V.Kannan, Advocate, Sr.No.8405 sml ssk/18.04.2011 /5c -2p/- Order made in W.P.(MD)No.3690 of 2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/