IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1020 of 1998 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- KUMNIBEN BIJALABHAI CHAUDHRY Versus MOHANBHAI MAGTABHAI CHAUDHRY -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Civil Revision Application No. 1020 of 1998 MR DR DHIMAR for Petitioner No. 1 RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 1 UNSERVED-EXPIRED (N) for Respondent No. 2 MR RN SHAH for Respondent No. 3-4 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR Date of decision: 19/02/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT Learned counsel for the petitioner states that this revision application has become infructuous in view of the fact that the original suit itself is decided by the trial Court. He therefore wants to withdraw this revision application. Permission is granted. This revision application is disposed of as withdrawn. Notice is discharged with no order as to costs. Interim relief granted earlier stands vacated. (P.B.Majmudar,J) (pathan)