Criminal Revision No. 644 of 2010 1 .. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. 644 of 2010 Date of Decision : April 26th, 2011 Sukhdev Singh ..... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. Anand Kataria, Advocate, for Mr. D.S.Gurna, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ranvir S. Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) Challenge is to the order dated November 13th, 2009 passed by Special Judge, Fatehgarh Sahib, whereby, charge in respect of commission of offence punishable under Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, “the Act”) was ordered to be framed against the petitioner and was accordingly charge sheeted, in case bearing First Information Report No. 47 dated May 14th, 2009 Police Station – Fatehgarh Sahib on the accusation that on April 15th, 2009 at about 11.30 AM, in the area of Village Ishergarh, District Fatehgarh Sahib, he was found in possession of 4000 tablets of Phenotil and 80 capsules of Parvon without any license or permit. Learned State counsel assisted by Shri Ajay Singla, Assistant Drugs Controller, Punjab has stated at the bar that as per the notification dated November 14th, 1985 issued by Government of India, no offence under Section 22 of the Act is made out against the Criminal Revision No. 644 of 2010 2 .. petitioner. In view of the statement of learned State Counsel, the order under challenge is set-aside. Resultantly, the revision petition is accepted and the petitioner is discharged. (NAWAB SINGH) JUDGE 26.04.2011 som