IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.770 of 2010 1. RAM BABU SINGH, S/O SRI BHUSHAN SINGH 2. NAVIN SINGH, S/O SRI KAMAL KISHORE SINGH 3. KAMLESH SINGH, S/O SAHDEO SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR **** /4/ 05.03.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make correction in the prayer portion. 2. Heard the counsel for the petitioners, the State and the informant. 3. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted under Sections 307 and other allies sections of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. 4. The prosecution case is that thirteen named accused persons came to his house and, thereafter, six accused, including the present petitioner, variously fired due to which a number of persons were injured. Apart from these thirteen named persons there were 25-30 also firing. It has been submitted that most of the accused persons have either been granted anticipatory or regular bail by this Court and the petitioners’ case stands similar to those who have been ordered to be released on bail. Under the circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, who are in custody since 22.12.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (rupees five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Session's Trial No. 356 of 2010 arising out of Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 326 of 2007 to the satisfaction of the Additional District Judge, II, Barh, on the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of each of the petitioners 2 who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the Court concerned if the petitioner(s) is/are implicated in any other case of similar nature after his/their release in the present case and thereafter the Court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iii) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he/they fail(s) to do so on two given dates and delay(s) the trial in any manner then his/their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iv) that the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. 5. The informant states that the petitioners are veteran criminals and are absconding in a number of cases. In case the petitioners tamper with prosecution evidence, the informant will be at liberty to file a petition in Court for cancellation of petitioners’ bail. S.A. (Anjana Prakash, J.)