IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.518 of 2006 NAND KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 7. 6.8.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This revision application has been filed against the order dated 20.5.2006 passed by Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur in Case No.II(A)39 of 1995 whereby the petition of the petitioner for discharge has been rejected. The only ground taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there was no report of chemical analyst to show that the seized article was Ganja. However, the report dated 9.2.1995 submitted by the Excise Chemical Analyst, which is at page 15 of the brief, goes to show that the article seized from the possession of the petitioner was examined by the Excise Chemical Analyst and it was found that the same was Ganja. Thus, it is apparent that the ground taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner has got no merit. Accordingly, the revision application is dismissed. Md.S. (Ghanshyam Prasad,J.)