1 SSMKi ^'g^'^^g, BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH} W.P. (S) N^vs3- of 2009 PETITIONER p,B3a«ts*^SM1-1' .....--^o-^TY Smt. Suman Singh, W/o Chandrahas / Shrivastava, aged about 42 years, '•;',".<KtJ' R/o Street-3, Nirala Chowk, Kasaridih Durg, Tah. and Distt. Durg (C.G.) RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1) State of Chhattisgarh Through-The Secretary Ministry of /Educaton, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2) Secretary Panchayat and Rural Welfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, ^. Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3) The Education Officer, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OR MANDAMUS/DIRECTION OF OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT. COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WMT PETmON (S) No. 7053 of2009 PETmONER s 4- Smt. Suman Sineh. VERSUS State ofClihattisgarh & Otliers. WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA Present: Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Siiri Y.S,Tha3<ur, Depury Advocate General forthe State/respondents. sed on 02"" day ot' Deceiiiber, 2009) \X 7^^ W ITiith the consent of leamed counsel for tiie parties, flie matter is heard iiiis.ilv. In the present petition, it has been brougiit to tlie notice offhe Court tiiat the impugtied transfer order dated 9 September, 2009 (Amiexure P/l) has b6en passed without complying with the policy aad the same requires reconsideration. Sl-iri Thakiu', leamed Deputy Advocate General appearing for the Stats, on instructions, verf fairiy submits that the case of the petitioner shall be considered afresh, ailer affbrding proper opportunity of heariiig to the parties concemed, 'to exairune asto whether the transfer order has been pasised in accordance vv'ith the policy ai'id till that time, the petitioaer shall not be diiiturbed. la view of foregoing, according to leanied couasel appearing for the petitioasr, iiothing sun'ivss in this petition for adjudication. Accordiugly, the writ petition is disposed of However, on the basis of subiiussion niade bv leamed Deputv Advocate General, it is made elear that the petitioner shall contmue on her place of postiiig, as obtahis today, t'il disposal of flie present dispute in her case, in aceordanee wifh law and on its own merits. No order asto costs. — —-~ -—- Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge