IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9929 of 2010 RAJENDRA MAHTO SON OF LATE SARYUG MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHANDOPATTI RUDAULI, POST DHURLAKH, P.S. SAMASTIPUR MUFASSIL, DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 2. THE CHAIRMAN, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, BIDYUT BHAWAN, PATNA-1 3. THE SECRETARY, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, BIDYUT BHAWAN, PATNA-1 4. THE ACCOUNTS OFFICER (FUND_ BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, BIDYUT BHAWAN, PATNA-1 5. THE GENERAL MANAGER-CUM-CHIEF ENGINEER, MITHILA ELECTRICITY SUPPLY AREA, DARBHANGA 6. THE ELECTRICIAL EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRIC SUPPLY DIVISION, SAMASTIPUR 7. THE ASSISTANT ELECTRICIAL ENGINEER, ELECTRIC SUPPLY SUB- DIVISON, SAMASTIPUR (RURAL) SAMASTIPUR ----------- 2 30.06.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the respondent-Board. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 31st August, 2009 from the post of Skilled Khalasi while working under the respondent no.7, the retiral dues have not been settled as yet except the payment of the amount under the group savings scheme. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner submitted all the requisite papers for payment of the retiral dues long ago, but still the respondent-Board has not settled and paid the same. Mr. Bijay Kumar Verma, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Board submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. - 2 - In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.6 with copy to the respondent no.3. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and upon consideration the admitted dues found payable could also be paid to the petitioner along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)