RA 116/11 in WP 11090/10 & five others 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NO.116/2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.11090/2010 Jagannath Banduappa Aalishe & others V/s The State & others. WITH REVIEW APPLICATION NO.117/2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.11107/2010 Annasaheb Khelba Mahanawar & others V/s The State & others. WITH REVIEW APPLICATION NO.118/2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.11100/2010 Shivaji Vithoba Morale & others V/s The State & others. WITH REVIEW APPLICATION NO.119/2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.11154/2010 Vitthal Gundappa Suntnure & others V/s The State & others. WITH REVIEW APPLICATION NO.120/2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.11260/2010 Laxman Pralhadrao Barkul & others V/s The State & others. WITH REVIEW APPLICATION NO.129/2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.11089/2010 Devidas Gangaram Rathod & others V/s The State & others. _______________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | Shri V.D. Salunke, Advocate h/f Shri R.K. Shingnapure, Advocate for applicants. Shri V.D. Rakh, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3. RA 116/11 in WP 11090/10 & five others 2 CORAM: B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. Date: 03.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. We find that an error apparent on the face of the record has accrued while passing an order under review by not noticing the earlier orders passed by this Court in various other petitions including Writ Petition No. 2737/2009 decided on 15.7.2009. In that view of the matter, the order dated 14.12.2010 is recalled. The petitions are restored to file. By consent, the petitions are taken on Board for admission. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The limited grievance raised by the petitioners is that though the petitioners have filed their applications u/s 23-A and 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, the possession of the petitioners’ land was taken prior to the award being passed. We dispose of the writ petitions by RA 116/11 in WP 11090/10 & five others 3 directing the respondent-Collector to dispose of the representations made by the petitioners as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of six weeks from today. (M.T. Joshi, J.) (B.R. Gavai, J.) Dt/- 03.10.2011 ndk/c3101134