D.B.Cr.Parole appl.No.2961/08 Karnel Singh v. State Date of Order: 11.7.2008 Hon'ble Mr. Prakash Tatia, J. Hon'ble Mr. Kishan Swaroop Chaudhari, J Mr. V.R. Mehta,P.P. The grievance of the petitioner is only that he has already been granted parole by the competent authority-the learned District Magistrate, Jaipur for his release on bail for 20 days by the order dated 2.2.2007 and was not released because of the reason that he could not furnish the bail bonds and local sureties. His submission is that he has already served more than 10 years' sentence, yet he is seeking first parole whereas he could have been released for 40 days if he would have availed the first and second parole. His father is said to be aged 80 years and is sick. It appears from the facts mentioned in the reply also that the accused has not been released on parole for more than one year because of the only reason that he could not give local sureties. Looking to the total sentence served by the convict-petitioner, we direct that the petitioenr may D.B.Cr.Parole appl.No.2961/08 Karnel Singh v. State submit sureties before tghe District Magistrate, Kethal (Haryana) who may forward the bail bonds to the Superintendent , Central Jail, Jodhpur. Upon receipt of the bail bonds from the sureties, after complying with the order dated 2.2.2007, the jail authorities may release the petitioner on parole on conditions given in the order dated 2.2.2007 for 20 days and may fix the date for surrender of the accused. The petition is according allowed. ( KISHAN SWAROOP CHAUDHARI) ,J. (PRAKASH TATIA),J. mlt