IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 10TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 21ST MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 4242 of 2009(E) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- N.S.PRADEEP, LAKSHMI VIHAR, BAPUJI NAGAR PONGUMOODU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/02/2009,ALONG WITH WPC NO.4259/09,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NOs. 4242 & 4259 OF 2009 ======================== Dated this the 10th day of February, 2009 J U D G M E N T In these writ petitions the petitioners had applied for variation of permits. Those applications were considered by the respondent and by Ext.P1 proceedings, the applications were rejected. Petitioners herein filed appeals as MVAA Nos.769/07 and 608/07. The appeals were allowed as per Ext.P2 judgments setting aside Ext.P1 orders and directing grant of variation subject to settlement of timings. The complaint in these writ petitions is that despite the judgments of the Tribunal becoming final, they are not being implemented by the respondent. 2. In view of the complaint of the petitioners as above, I see no justification for the delay in the matter. Therefore, the writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondent to implement Ext.P2 judgments directing grant of variation to the petitioners and convene the timing conference for settlement of the timings. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 2 months of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp