IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P.(T) No. 4303 of 2008. Decided on: 24th September, 2010. Mrs. Kamla Verma. …Petitioner. -Versus- The State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 and 2. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For respondent No. 3. : Mr. Ajeet Saklani, Advocate vice Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that services of the petitioner have been terminated during the pendency of this petition. Consequently, she is permitted to withdraw this petition, with liberty to institute fresh petition to enable her client to assail the order of termination. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn, so also the pending application(s), if any. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge September 24, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.