... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5804 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.5804 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.5804 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5803 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.5803 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.5803 OF 2005 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Mrs S.D.Shinde, A.P.P. for the Applicant. Shri Marwadi for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : SEPTEMBER 01, 2006. : SEPTEMBER 01, 2006. : SEPTEMBER 01, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned A.P.P. for the Applicant and Shri Marwadi appearing for the Respondent. Affidavit-in-reply is taken on record. The Application is strongly opposed by the Advocate appearing for the Respondent. In view of the averments made in the Application and in the affidavit of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, High Court, Mumbai, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b). JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE