IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40789 of 2008 MD.CHHOTE Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 23.10.2008 Heard Mr. V.K. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. The informant was robbed and while he was sored of, a patrol jeep of the police came there and it chased the robbers and the petitioner was caught on chase. It is true that there is allegation in the F.I.R. that the petitioner had also relieved the informant of some properties but it is also the other part of the story that the same was not recovered from the petitioner. But this is going to minimize the allegation no bit inasmuch as the informant very much states that one of the robbers was caught on chase and the apprehended robber was being identified as the real participant and he was the petitioner whereafter the written report was lodged. Under the above facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to direct release of the petitioner. The petition is dismissed. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )