In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh CRM No. M-17339 of 2009 (O&M) Sumitra Rani and others ..... Petitioners vs State of Punjab ..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. S. C. Chhabra, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Anter Singh Brar, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Rajesh Bindal J. On 3.7.2009, the following order was passed:- “Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in the present case in cross fight both the parties had suffered injuries. All the injuries on the person of both the sides were found to be simple in nature. It is only one injury suffered by Harmesh Singh on his right forearm with sharp edged weapon which was found to be grievous in nature for which Section 326 IPC was invoked.” Learned counsel for the State submitted that on enquiry from the village it was found that it was not a case of cross fight. He further stated that in an accident of two motorcycles the petitioners also intervened and caused injuries to the complainant side when the matter was being settled by the Sarpanch. It is not disputed that the petitioners had already joined the investigation. Be that as it may, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the controversy, in my opinion, custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not required. The interim bail granted to the petitioners vide order dated 3.7.2009 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. 21.7.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge