'^T^' SiNGL^^NCH e^ \ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) Nd. ^ '/2010 PETITIONER (? .<••^•^^"'nQ^' ^•••'•^^'^ ^^^ ^••••"" RESPONDENTS / Smt. Kapila Kerketta, W/o Shri Anil Minz, Aged about 51 years, R/o Pre Metric Hostel Batauli Surguja, Permanent Address Village Roopsera, Tahsil Bageecha, District -Jashpur (C.G.). VERSUS / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, S.T. and S.C. Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). /2. Commissioner, Tribal Development Department, Raipur (C.G.). ^ 3. Collector, District-Surguja (C.G.). ^4. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Developnient, Ambikapur, District- Surguja (C.G.). ^5. Block Education Officer, Batauli, District -Surguja (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA ..^^lK ^^'^. ^ ey ^<i^^:.. •^^-^^•^.\^ /^/^""^' \ wvl '%S,y ^i^'^®1,^1 ~~^^^z^.^^ ^•<T2S^ ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (8) No. 5251 of2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Smt. Kapila Kerketta. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Ofhers. WMT PEmiON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSIITU'nON OF INDIA SB: Hon'Me Shri Satish K. Agmhotri, J. Present: Shri Atanu Ghosh, Advocate for the petitioner. Shii .Aran Sao, Govemment Advocate for the State/respondents ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 26U1 day ofAugust, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearmg for the petitioner, on instmctions. submits that this petition has become infructuous, 2. Leanied counsel appearing for other side does not controvert the above submission. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as havmgbecome infmctuous. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge