1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.07.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.(MD)No.5840 of 2011 Krishnasamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2.The Revenue Divisional officer, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Tahsildar, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District. 4.The Village Administrative Officer, Anupankulam Village, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to cancel the assignments granted in favour of Mrs.Pollammal, Sornammal and Pandian in respect of the properties situated in Survey Numbers 396/1 & 2, 391/2, 391/3 and 395/1 & 2, Andiapuram Village, Anupankulam Village Panchayat, Sivakasi Taluk, Virudhunagar District, within the stipulated period. For Petitioner ... Mr.G.Marimuthu For Respondents ... Mr.TR.Janarthanam, Additional Govt. Pleader ORDER The petitioner has come up with this writ petition to direct the the respondents to cancel the assignments granted in favour of Pollammal, Sornammal and Pandian in respect of the properties situated in Survey Numbers 396/1 & 2, 391/2, 391/3 and 395/1 & 2, Andiapuram Village, Anupankulam Village Panchayat, Sivakasi Taluk, Virudhunagar District, within the stipulated period. 2. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents. 3. By consent, this writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. Though this Court earlier directed the petitioner to implead those persons who will be affected as party-respondents in this writ petition, the learned Counsel for the petitioner now submits that he has made a representation to the District Collector for cancelling the assignment https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 given by the third respondent. In this case no representation has been given to the third respondent. However, he submits that the petitioner will make a fresh representation to the third respondent herein. 5. In such view of the matter, on receipt of the fresh representation from the writ petitioner, the third respondent herein is directed to consider and dispose of the same on merits and in accordance with law. If the rights of the above said persons namely Pollammal, Sornammal and Pandian, will be affected by any such claim of the writ petitioner, it is incumbent on the part of the third respondent to put those persons on notice as to avoid the allegations of violation of principles of natural justice. 6. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl.side) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To: 1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2.The Revenue Divisional officer, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Tahsildar, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District. 4.The Village Administrative Officer, Anupankulam Village, Virudhunagar District. +1CC TO THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SR.21686 +1CC TO MR.G.MARIMUTHU, ADVOCATE SR.21545 rsb SR : 22.07.2011 : 2p/7c W.P.(MD)No.5840 of 2011 04.07.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/