tv l G) p^ THE mGH COURT OF JUDIGATURE CHHATTISGASH AT BILASPUR W.P. 2^07 / 2002 loner Radheshyam Sharma S/o Pandit Rameshwar Prasad Shaaua, aged about 56 years Chamnan, Dist : Co-operatiye Centrat BaiA Ltd., Raipur, R/o Samtha Colony, Raipur, Dist : Raipur - (C.G.) Versus |>ondents Madhya Pradesh State Co-operative Tribimal Bhopal, Otd Assembly Building, Bhopal-(M.P.) The Registrar Co-operati|ve Societies Raipur, Krishak Nagar Labhandi Eu-m, Raipur- (C.G.) The Joint Registrar Co-operatiye Societies, Raipur Krishak Nagar Labhaadi Fum, Raipur - GOyfyHTVTKW OF INMA 4^ The Disfrict Go-operative Central^ank, Raipur, Through its Managing Direc :W»J PETmi©]'<r.®NI)ERAR'riCI.E 226/227 OF THE Sd/- P.C NAIK Judge j «>. XI-HC-22 '3^ •^iiiinf, 9-nl'M'is, fticii'My 11HCTI (hKlct) Sff^T 'tR^; ^...M.f... ?:.A.l^..S'M fere^g' SII^T^T ft-li.* 3Ilt?I shHI^ ^II sn^i's^nw^ifet B7.04Ji004 cbi^d^'1 •MH^lf^ fe^ <Rq^K '^r <il!tit| sii^i Shri P. Diwakar, counsel for fl|ie petitioner. Shri Satfsh Gupta, Depuly Qovcmiaeat Advocate for ffae ptate/respoudent No.l to 3. None appears on behalfofres^ondent No.4. Shri Manmdra SIuwastaya,| counsd for Intervenei^Shri (Shesh Narayaa Shidda. This oider shall gdvera fhe ^isposal of I.A. No.2172/2004 on betoalf of fhe petlttoner for ^rittKlrEwal of the writ petitioti, which it 'bas bcen mentionjed th4t thc preseat writ pctition has fited challctign^g thc lcgaMly i^ thc oidcr datcd 22.10.2002 |which has bccn sct asidc by tfac Rcjgistear, Co-opcrativc Socictics, axid fhe petituaCT has again oined as Chau-maa, District Co-^peratwe Central Baak Ltd., |therefoie, at thw stagc, 1lie petiti|iwier wants to -wifhdtaw fhis jpetttion with a liberty to file fhe sam^ ifoccasion so arfaes. Iiutialfy, fhis writ petition beaijiag No.2107/3002 was fOed by jthe petitioner ^amat M.P. State (po-operativc Tribimal, Bhopal, ]Rcgistrar, Co-opcratwe Societiest Raipur, Joiat Registrar, -/^ paipur vide order dated 02.04. r~y :<0 XJ-HC-22 '-f~\ ^ ! •^ .;/ ~S^~:WvR, »-a)wis,Rgfli«y .U:>.^'..A(.<:'?.L?..'! *ii*mi g,^,ch --—-——•-——-———•g^ ia|*({<T' sii^r^g ft-)t* 3)^('g sh^i^ titio W^lS ^-WIWBftW ^2-- ^*i?<'i41^ ^i^^^ i^S <T<(|^< ^S^OTSll^T Co-operative Societies & Dmt^ict Cto-operative Central Banlc cbaUengu^; fhe teyaWy and |»ropriety of the notice dated 21.03.2001 iasued by the Joint Registrar, Cio-opcrative Societics, Raipur. Hpwcver, laler on Tribun^I also dismissed fhe revision filed by the petltioner vide order da|ted 28.11.2001 wbfch was also chaUei^jed and later on Joiat R^istear, Co-operative Societies vide onler dated 22.10.2002 renaove^ thc petitioaer fi»mthe post of Chauman of Distdtet Co-operathje Ceateal Baak, Raq>ur and also flnrn the post of ex-offlcio caiain|ian <rftbs Staff Sub-Comnilttee of tfae Bank. Tbeicfaaie, by seetemj; anKiidment thte order has also bccn assaifcd in ttus writ pctiticu^ In thc m.cantiinc, an appli^atimi for intervcntfcm i.c. M.W.P. No.896/2004 was filed oa befaal^ of Shri Sbesh Naceyan Shulda in wbich he has prayed to 9tay th^ dated 02.04.2004 passed by fh«| SIui Shesh Narajraa Shulda i4 petitioner should not be allowed |io wifhdraw the writ petitfon. efifect aad operation of fhe order Registrar, Co-opeiative Societies, Cfahattisgsrh, Raipiu- ia suo-xaot|io review case No.80-1/2004. I.A. No.2199/2004 objection to fbe japplication ftir witihdrawal of fhe writ petition has also been fi|sd on behalf of the Intervener- which fae has prayed fhat the »^=s- T XI-HC-22 3H^I^[ R;-<i«k affl^r ai*ii<T) tiRa f. • /:" 'S^ •<(i<<ig<i, SIT|IWIS, Si*flti^<. *)it<wisb*(r^ A.1?^^2- fNs^i' •s^i'^gigT'gfer -ir I baue heanl Shri Diwakar Gowettuncnt add Shri Satish Gupta, Depuly State/icspondcnt No.l to 3 leamed counsel for <IK Intervener} At the outeet, teamed fhat fae is not pressixig the seeoi^l petltioner may be allowed wiBi a J^amed counsel for ihe petitioner, Advocate on behatf of the Shri Itteiundra. Shifoastava, 1-Shn She^i Narayan ShuMa. for fhe petitfoner subnutted part of flie apptkattoa &at the liQt>ert8 to^fite fincsh. if occasion so couttsel arises. Theref&TC, in vtew of teanied <xnmsel for tfae petittoner, dris writ petition uacoiMlitioaaIty'. tbat siacc thc onler whfch fhc OTdcr sct asadc by ttic Rcpstiar, cjffiKStaie of Us powers vide xiotiMaQ^ reaaaains sn, ^aaa pcttti^ infructuous. Tbetefoie, the fhis petition. Leamed Deputy Gover opposed fhe icquest aflcans On fhe other hand Intervena^Shri Shesh <hl^l<n<ft'T^W^*^ fe^ <f^^l^ ii'aiPOTan^CT fhe sibcwe subintosion made by fhc petitioner waats 10 wltbdxaw Leaiaed coiinsd flirthcr axyied p^dtk>ncr Uas cliattengcd Uas bccn C^-opcrativc Socictacs, Raipur in dated 02.04.2004, fherefoae, >n and isbe aaiae has becoanae petitlnaer aiay he aBowed to wi&vSxetw ueht Advocate for fhe State has nut cjunael forthe petitioiiet'. ^s- ihrisastawa, teamtA-couiKel for ShuMa has raised serious XI-HC-22 '3:5?':?IFn?PT, yal'M'Ko, i»iiviiuy iiiCTt WHrai sn^r ira^? ..-2lnll°.3s:.^ 200 f^B^r' 'A l^y sn^i'n VW* 3^V sti^N) -af^n 3iA<i<-wiw 'dfer ^ 'bKjtrl'il-i H14ci?'^fe^ ifatiK ^siPaiiaD^r /•"~\ objectioh fhat whea thto matt^r 21.03.'X)01, 22.10.2001 & 28.1J: Regtetrar &M.P. Stete Co-opeiatiw|! befoTe this Court, ttoe Regfetrar, Cot have p^sed llie oider dated O2.(| passcd tlris ordcr in suspidous caz^\ that ttie petitioner has nMde &ls^ that he has alr^dy withdcanirai appMcation for wtthdramal of ttu^ stould not be altowed. Leamcd assaiBag fhe prdws dated jl.2001 passed by fhe Joiat Tnbunal, Hhopal was pexidiog l-opeiative Societies ought not to [14-2004 aad the Registem' has cirtiumstances. He ftBfher submits statemeat befoie the Regfcstiar the petitton. TiwrefiMre, ttae petUton (I.A. No.2172/2004) cjouasd fiw llie Inteavcna-icUed upon thc dccisiBa of thc Hiai'bfc ^pcx Oourt passcd in thc mattcr of EttNte of MalMurarttni Nnd atteai V Irinnr HWiB KidhWtri aA.fi^ffla-rcpo''ted in AIR 1996 9G 799 and hc placcd icUmice on Raiagraph-9 of the judgment counsel for tte petitioaer placed passcd aa the mattw of fiUielinriaal Oa liie othisr haaui, leanied his rdiance on the judgmeat CiwpmtaUaa af badto litd. V. NaelwdB B»utka;»& Co. nported (a JT 2004 (41 8028 ; First of aU, so fer fhe J4'teT»entk>a ^pUcatuai of tfac mteivener fa coaccn]®d,it has aolt bcen aBowed. Moreover, thc authorfly rdfed iq>ouby tearaed cjnmsel far tihc lutevener ra aot XI-HC-22 '3^ -itWld'y,. afllwis, f«l<liu»i< ry.^ fo *<wwi g^qrai SV^ 'Vf^SR _...........S:te3.C«!3^....'WI, 200 fq^I' siii^T'^n Pi-ii?»i snjsi y^\<^ ^ii^t afler was entiBefy diflfTFnt rituatioa in passcd the onlcr. In that casc, was filed a^iast fhe tcspomient under Section 5(1)(^ of Prewentio^i possessnq; assete disproporti(Miate lIieEefare, the respondeat TaaA fited Ifhe Codc of Qammal Ploeedurc 3ii^<i <wwato -~s"l- applicable in fhe &cts aiid (arcuins' ^riuch fhe Hoa'ble Apex Court invcstigation a charge sfaect for conuaisston of fhe ofifeace of Cormptimi Act. 1988 for to laa kaown source ofiacome, ^petition under Section 482 of |& imder Artfcfe 227 of flie ICoastttutton of India fer quasliuig |him and the High Court qu^hedj Iwluch thc Stote QtWcnuncnt wcnt jApcx Q>urt aud ffic argumcnte o| jpartiiea weic heard and dTuring the peaEned oounael for the responde^ts jorder aaay be passed agaiast tfie T4spoadent by the Hon'bte Apex jCourt flMin he nnadc a subnussfa>4 fhat fhc respoadent aa^r be jaBowed to wifhdraw Sue oiiginal i^rit petltion an<l that tn&y be jdismisacd as withdranyn. In that st|aatidn fhc Hontle Apex Cozirt lial obscrved fhat: ttiWicii'l'i iiwriT'^ft1';) ^RitsK ^; ariSOT sii^i aaces of Vae preseiit caae, fhat w the saad piosccution s^ainst the said pn»ecuUon ^ainst an~agpBadl bcfiin: &C Hon'bte thc learacd counacl for ibc (sourse of fhe atgiunents wben j assessed fhat the adverse Wd<i -f- XI-HC-22 '3^•<fi''<ici<<, »T)I'M'IS, Iqwi'yy *<IHCTI thlltfl 3ff^r ira^? ..<&.l.?.'7.jf?.^. "^ 200 'fa^iT' sii^i ^r VWfb S^S sti*iich ^tf^cr 3II^?[ ^dCTT ^lfcr -<-1 <:hl<tt(rt41Tf 'RTq^f ^ 'f^^' <Pnt$r< r i? 3lPtIH 3II^F "A parly to tfae proceedix^[ tbis stage at luist to tahe a the impression fhat he wffll| permission to withdraw Wf obviErusty witfa a view to contentions wrlifch Iiave tsannot be aUowed, at |chaaacc anid if he gete not succeed to sedc adjudicated upoii, by a subordinate Court thou^i iDJ' We stxosyfy deprecate a cxtete. Tliis wiB be oppose^ and aiey teal to uahcalfhj| not bc conduciyc." Bi^ origmal procealiiig ic-agitate (he same been or may be, |H^»r Court before idiflfereBt proceedu^s. ptK:ttec Ute tfals, tf It to judldal duscqriine practfec^ wbicb •wffl Because ia that case thfi wh"it High Court on Biwtta llien befba^ that otder was cliflileitged leame|<y xnade a subinisdon fiw wlth<ii'aw4d was sot pennitted by fhe Court petltioaer baa cliallnngBd and and so far fhis Court has not ddeldcd ttus matter and it is stiB njrit petitioa was aBowed by fhe fhe HoaT»Ie Apex Coiurt wfaen couasel for fhe respoadeats of tlw origiaal petitkin wluch i|i7hcres» in fhe ptesent casc ^c fhe ordeis naentiOaed abow assdited pending for adjudicatioa and M (he meantime, ttie Registear, ^ XI-HC-22 'TS -Iii'=tiwt,.®til«'ri<o,fai'iwy *<!*<CTI ai*iitti 3n^?r 'ira^ ..S.ls.^.k.'^.. "Ht. 200 ftre^r" 3II^?[^I f^ilcti <tti3i<t ^ffea, Sitl^l^ ]- sti^r s^n^ •^rfsa dlatcd Co-operatiwe Societies vMe atder powers set asitle fhe ixapugned ord^rs, petitionfir is fhat since his grievanc^ of the Regfatiar, ffaerefbre, no(hm|g aad fhe same may be disinissed Tbs petitioner was woridnjg opCTative Central Baak Ltd. Raipuifand No.3- Jotot Registrar issued a sho(T reganling certaln inegulartties co^imll thc pctltioaer Iiad preferred a Tribunal faut fhc sainc was disauBstri 02.04.2004 exeaxasing bis ^rs, tberefore, -Qae icqiiest ofthc ^ stauids vuultcated by (he ordcr Temains in fhis writ petttton ortltsr oirdel-a Thc Joint RcgisteaT passcd thc fbe post crf Cttau'uan. Theae writ petition and Auice Qse Registt'aj' vMe otder dated 02.04.^)041aaa petitioncr has already takea oye^ District Co-operati»e Gential circumstances, fhe ^petitiDncr withdrawal <rf tfae petitfaMt. The lltiuatiftn and nohodv caa comixl cffi*ffo<'ilyt Mt*w^^ fa^ ^t-^i< ^ s^n -StfT^s >(hmfe aslwifhdraiwa. : as Ctoaumaa, [ystrict Co- on 24.03.2001 responGtent cause iiotfce to IIie pctittotier cotualtted by hlm agalnst wfateh ii^vl^>n bcfiae the Co-oparative vidc otdcr dated ^, l 1.2002. abt vcmimias thc pctitkacr finm h^ptw '^ftfr\ <*tiqtn)pngR<l jfi thl^ . Co-operative Socjeties, Raipur aride fhe above oider aad the fhe clwaye as Cbainnan of |Banlc Ltd, Raipur, ia | flic inoved^ the application for is flie sote master ofhis hAs peptKMier hiia to oursue wifli fhe matter. ^•o <7 XI-HC-22 sii^r^r fct't^ ^t^cSt -*f^ ff^fl y" Roshan/- 'S^ •<11<11C1<1, CTulwiS, f«»<vtl«y »ffWtlthNfcfi 3(T5t?T TRra? .^!onh^. "Wl 200 'fa^?T" <tit^»^«ti^t^f^a % connaue The petiitunier cannot be foTcedf aj^unst fais wishes. Moaeovcr, by by fhe Rcgistrar this petition has wfll be seived in aBowlng to has beiMi held by the Honlile Ape^ Corpcaation ofladia Ltd. V. Macii^ JT 2004(4) SC 25. The intMventiDn apiriteatfo4 alfaiwed so &r and tf tte Iws asy 02.04.2004 passed by thc availaibte to Um aadBT law, ifso^ Sincc ttic pctitfoacr waatsj UscaondxtioiiaBy, ffauefore, the ap^p aBowed and fhe petiticiatt is distuls^t to coatiaue wtth ibe petition ^insfring otder dated 02.04.2004 |icc(Mne infi'uctuoius, no puxpose fhe mfiructuous matter, as Court in the iiiatter ofSh^)pmg lao Bioliiesrs & (yfliesra reported ta of fhe Intuveiier luas not been <lintn1f»<cd <ftl<t^^1 iit*tCT? "^ FS^ <RT^*< ^? <fff^FT 3?Rt^T jrievance ayaxast the order dated he caaa aroil Ifce renKdy Iviscd. R^i^tear, to wifhdraw this writ pctitton lUcation (I.A. No. 2172/3004) ia aa'wiQxArasm. Sd/- , L.C.BHADOO Judge' rtiNI?^f^ %) '^^