(Spl.-H.C.A.S.,C.D.,78-e) FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPELLATE SIDE MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.698 OF 2004 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 71 OF 2004 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Note, Office Memoranda of Quorum, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s Orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. J. A. Lobo, advocate for the applicants. CORAM : B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATE : 29th October, 2004. P.C.: Heard Mr. Lobo, learned counsel for the applicants, who are the appellants in Second Appeal No. 71/2004. 2. Respondent no.1(d) in the Second Appeal expired on 15th January, 2004 leaving behind her son by name Paresh and her husband is already on record as respondent no.1(c). To bring the minor son on record application under stamp no.2314/2004 has been filed, but belatedly. Hence this application for condonation of delay. - 2 - 3. There is a delay of 80 days and it deserves to be condoned by levying costs. 4. Hence, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), subject to payment of costs quantified at Rs.500/- (rupees five hundred only). Costs to be deposited with the State Legal Service Authority. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. mc.