vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2775 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO.2775 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO.2775 OF 2006 Girish Chandrakant Akul ... Petitioner V/s. M/s.Sangam Papers Corp. & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.S.Sakhare for Petitioner Mr.M.J. Jamdar for Respondent No.1 CORAM: SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. MHATRE, J. MHATRE, J. DATED: JULY 24, 2007 JULY 24, 2007 JULY 24, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . This petition challenges the order of the Industrial Court disallowing the Petitioner to lead secondary evidence. The petitioner had placed on record 15 documents with a list at Exhibit U6. These documents were later exhibited after recording the petitioner’s evidence, as Exhibit U33. An officer of the Employees State Insurance Corporation has been examined and crossexamined. It was only thereafter that the petitioner sought to lead secondary evidence for proving the photocopies of the documents produced alongwith a list at Exhibit U6. 2. In my opinion, the Industrial Court has committed no error by setting aside the order of the Labour Court. The petitioner cannot be permitted to prove the same documents which he has already sought to prove and which are now exhibited as U33 by means of secondary evidence, merely because some inconvenient admissions have been brought on record in the evidence. : 2 : 3. Hence, the petition is rejected.