1 wp2108.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Criminal Writ Petition No. 2108 of 2011 Mr. Arunkumar Kamalashankar Dubey & anr. ....Petitioners v/s. The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent Mr. E.B. Dixit for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Pednekar-APP for the State. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI, J. 29th July, 2011 PC: The limited grievance made in the petition is that though the petitioners in their application for anticipatory bail are pressing for interim protection, the learned trial Court is insisting on the presence of the applicants without granting any interim protection. 2. The Petition can be disposed of with following directions:- The learned trial Judge would consider the application of the present petitioners for grant of interim protection. If the learned Judge grants any interim protection in favour of the petitioners and if an application is made on behalf of the prosecution for a direction that the applicants should remain present at the time of considering the application filed, the learned Judge would consider the said issue in accordance with Section 438(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code. 3. The Petition is disposed of with aforesaid directions. (B.R. GAVAI, J)