IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 8TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 17TH KARTHIKA 1932 OP(C).No. 312 of 2010(O) ------------------------ OS.16/1998 of MUNSIFF COURT, KOLENCHERRRY .................... PETITIONERS: ------------------------------- 1. C.K.RAJAMMA, AGED 47, W/O.BHASKARAN, ATTULLIL, ELAMKULAM VILLAGE, ELAMKULAM DESOM, KANAYANNOOR TALUK. 2. C.K.MOHANAN, S/O.KOCHUKUTTAN, AGED 54 BARBER, CHENAL HOUSE, KADAMATTOM KARA, AIKKARANAD NORTH VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK. 3. C.K.JANAKI RAVEENDRAN, KARISSERIL VEEDU, PANANGU KARA, KADVOOR PO, PAINGOTTOOR VILLAGE. 4. C.K.AMMINI VASU, CHAKODATHU MELIL VEEDU, VADAKUNNATHU PUZHA, MULLAKKULAM VILLAGE, P.O.PERUVA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 5. C.K.SAVITHRI CHANDRAN, MATTATHIL VEEDU, PANGODU KARA P.O., PANGODE AIKKARANADU VILLAGE. 6. C.K.SARASU, KALLOLICKAL VEEDU, KURIANATTU KARA, P.O.KURIANADU MINIPILLY VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 7. RUGMINY, AGED 65, W/O.PADMANABHAN KADAVOOR KARA, PINGTTOR VILLAGE. 8. HARISH PADMANABHAN, S/O.PADMANABHAN, KADAVOOR KARA, PINGOTTOOR VILLAGE. 9. SINDHU, D/O.PADMANABHAN, KADAVOOR KARA, PINGOTTOOR VILLAGE. 10. SEENA, D/O.PADMANABHAN, KADAVOOR KARA, PINGOTTOOR VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. ANANADAN, S/O.PAPPU, AGED 42, CHENNAL HOUSE, KADAMATTOM KARA, AIKKARANADU NORTH VILLAGE. 2. SUKUMARAN, S/O.PAPPU, AGED 55, CHENNAL HOUSE, KADAMATTOM KARA, AIKKARANADU NORTH VILLAGE. 3. GOPI, S/O.PAPPU, AGED 60, CHENNAL HOUSE, RAMANGALAM KARA, RAMANGALAM VILLAGE. 4. KAVALAMMA, W/O.SANKARAN, AGED 57, ARACKAL PUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE, NELLIKUZHY KARA, ERAMALLOOR VILLAGE. 5. PARU, W/O.PAPPU, RETIRED LIFE, AGED 80, CHENNAL HOUSE, KADAMATTOM KARA, AIKKARANADU NORTH VILLAGE. THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOMAS P JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------- O.P(C).No.312 of 2010 --------------------------------------- Dated this 08th day of November, 2010 JUDGMENT Counsel for petitioners submits that petitioners have already filed application to review the judgment and decree in the second appeal and hence this petition is not pressed. Resultantly this petition is dismissed as not pressed without prejudice to the right, if any, of petitioners to pursue the application for review said to have been filed. (THOMAS P JOSEPH, JUDGE) Sbna/-