BEFORE HON'BLE THE HIGHCQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.PJC1 N0. P7fz/2008 fSB1 PETITIONER Madanlal Sahu aged about 50 Years , S/o Shri Sukhlal R/o Village—Kopedih, Tahsil and Distt. Rajnandgaon, [ C. G. ] VERSUS RESPONDENTS / ...^^ .-f^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Deptt. of Commerce And Indusfry, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, P. O. & Distt. Raipur. ^<y^ [C.G.] ^••^^ .^"" \^v!^^ ....••''' , 2. Collector, Rajnandgaon [ C. G. ] ^3. Sub Divisional Officer, Rajnand- Gaon, [ C. G. ] Chhattisgarh State Industrial ^° '^ Development Corporation Ltd, \° ^ (f^'^ t An undertaking of the State of ^t^ y^ Chhattisgarh ], LIC Commercial Complex, [ ground floor & 2nd floor ] Pandri, P. O. & Distt. Raipur, { C. G. ] WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA—FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI & MANDAMUS AND ANY OTHER WRIT / DIRECTION / ORDER : ^ HIGH CQURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (0 No. 1 172 of2008 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Madanlal Sahu. VERSU8 State ofChhattisgarh <fe Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ART1CLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUnON OF LNDIA SB: Honrble Shri Satish K. Aenihotri, J. Present: Shri Amrito Das, Advocate tbr the petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Pcmel Lawyer fbr the State/respondetrt No. ,lto 3. Shri KashifShakeel, Advocate fbrfhe respondent No. 4. ORDER(ORA1.) (Passed on 30th day of June, 2010) 1. Leaiiied counsel appearmg for the petitioner submits that as the land in dispute has been denotified under the provisions of Laiid Acquisition Act, 1894, thus, nofliing surv7ives in this petition for adjudication and prays fbr withdrawal offhis petition. 2. Leamed counsel appearing fbr other side has no objection. 3. It is ordered accordingly. 4. Consequently, the writ petition is disimssed as withdra^^ii. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Armt