Writ Petitfon No. 1140 of 2005 Rsiy Plaintiff Present; Jhaduram ^ son of Late i, aged about 60 years, Kurre, agricuiturist, Thakkarpara, Ward No.9 Gudhiyari, attist Versus 1. Smt. Pumima Srivastava, aged about 45 years, widow of !ate Aiok Srivastava, '• resident of Plot No.227, Sector-1, <- Geetanj'aU Nagar, Raipur. ^' 2. Smt. Sandhya Agrawat, aged about 36 years, wife of Shri Rakesh Agrawai, resident ofStationiRoad, Raipur, Tahsil and Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh). 3. S ;*Q nf r* \-» it Petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India) SB: Hon'bie Kflr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Pawan Kesharv'ani, coynsel Shri B.P. Sharma, counse! for the respondents No. 1 and 2. Shri R. Agrawal, Panei Lawysr for the respondent No.S/State. • [Passedon this17m day of October, 2008) Mr. B.P. Sharma, tearned counsei appearing for th®respondents No. 1 and 2, cn instructions, submits that Civii Suit No; 76-A/2004 pending before 11 Additional District Judge, Raipur, has already been decreed in favour of the petitioner. Thus, nothing survives In the matter a^*13 tor aaj'uSication. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petittoner does not controvert fhe statement made by tearned counsei forthe respondents No. 1 and 2. .3) The petitjon is accordingly dismissed as having become •t^^B i^t4 in?ructuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^iIt: