^ Petitioners iN—a Respondents HtGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 1703 of 2004 1. SiAapa Dey, aged about 50 years, wd/o. Late ^>ri Sujay Dey. 2. Shoumik Dey, aged about 26 years, S/o. Shri Sujay Dey. 3. Sanjay Dey, aged about 52 years, S/o. Shri Satendrenath Dey. Petitioners No-1 to 3 R/o. Hospital Road, Juni Line, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. At present R/o. 5 Gulu Ostagar Lane, Koikate, 700006. Through Atorney Shri R.S. Ba^fva, aged about 50 y^rs, S/o. Late Shri M.8. Bajwa, R/o. B-4, Minocha Colony, Bilaspur, District Bitaspur, Chhattisgarh. Versus 1. Manakshi Dey, aged Major W/o. Ravindranath Dey 2. Arun Kumar Dey, aged - Mlajor, S/o. Shri Phanindra Nath Dey. Respondents No. 1 and 2 are R/o. Mission Hospital Road, Juni Line, Bilaspur, District BJIspur, Chhattisgarh. 3. State of Chhattisgarh through Colteetor, Bitaspur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Board of Revenue, through its SecnBtary, Bilaspur, Chhatttsgarh. ^L (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India.) SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satisli K. Agnthotri, J. Thakur Presenfc None for the petitioners. Shri VivekVerma; Ranei Lawyer forthe State. ORAt. ORDER (Passedon thjs10thdayorseptember, 2008) The msrtter is called for hearing twice. On both oocastons, none appears nor ss any representation made on behalf of the petitioners. The petitioners may not be Interested in the matter. 2) !n view of the above, the writ petition te dismissed for want of prosecution. Consequentiy, M.W.P.No.1522 of 2004 stands disposed of. _ __^——— Sd/- SatishK-Agnihom Judge