IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2998 of 1996 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.D.SHAH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- RELIANCE AND OTHER MILL WORKERS UNION Versus ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF UNIONS -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MUKUL SINHA for Petitioner MR AK CLERK for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.D.SHAH Date of decision: 01/07/97 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Oral common Judgment dictated in Spl.C.A. 2997 96 with Spl. C.A. 2998 of 1996 is transferred here) ---------- IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2997 of 1996 WITH SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2998 of 1996 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.D.SHAH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? 1 to 5 No -------------------------------------------------------------- Parties in Spl.C.A.No. 2997 of 1996 RELIANCE AND OTHER MILL WORKERUNION Versus ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF UNION Parties in Spl. C.A.No. 2998 of 1996 RELIANCE AND OTHER MILL WORKERS UNION versus Assistant Registrar of Unions & The Ahmedabad Silk Employees Union. -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance in Spl. C.A.No. 2997 of 1996: MR MUKUL SINHA for Petitioner MR DS VASAVADA for Respondent No. 2 Appearance in Spl. C.A.No. 2998 of 1996: Mr. Mukul Sinha for petitioner Mr. Abhilash K. Clark for Respondent No.2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.D.SHAH Date of decision: 01/07/97 ORAL COMMON JUDGEMENT Having heard Mr. Mukul Sinha for the petitioner in Spl. C.A. No. 2997 and 2998 of 1996 at length after the judgment and order of Justice M.R. Calla in Spl. C.A. No. 10322 of 1996 dated 6th, 7th May, 1997 for practically the whole day on 30th June, 1997 and 1.7.1997 and having heard Mr. M.R. Barot appearing for Mr. D.S. Vasavada for Mill Mazdoor Sabha, Rajpur and Mr. A.K. Clark for Ahmedanad Silk Employees Union, today, at the conclusion of oral submission, Mr. Mukul Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in the above two petitions, seeks permission to withdraw unconditionally the aforesaid two petitions. The request being just and proper is granted. The advocates appearing for the other parties have no objection. However, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Industrial Court, Ahmedabad, is directed to decide the appeals pending before him expeditiously so that the rival claims of the unions to be the representative union of the industry are set at rest at the earliest so that issues pending before the appellate court are decided which ultimately would help in deciding the issues pending before the Registrar. Permission is granted. Petitions stand disposed of as withdrawn. Rule is discharged in each petition. No costs. --------- pnn