1 wp8127-8105.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8127 OF 2010 Dongare Dwadashi Trust ..Petitioner versus Bhiku K. Karkar (since deceased) through his legal heirs Digambar B. Karkar & Anr ..Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.8105 OF 2010 Dongare Dwadashi Trust ..Petitioner versus Aba Mhasku Lohokare (since deceased) through his legal heirs Mahadeo A. Lohokare & Anr ..Respondents Mr.Nitin P. Deshpande for the petitioner in both the petitions. Mr.Vinod Jadhav for respondent Nos.1A and 1B in W.P.No. 8127/2010. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 22nd July 2011. P.C.: . Heard both sides. The only point that is raised is that the authority has committed an error in holding that the Trust having come into existence after 1st April 1957, the 2 wp8127-8105.doc proceedings under the Tenancy Act can be continued even though the property belongs to public charitable trust. 2 After having carefully examined the orders under challenge, I am of the view that the Tenancy Act has been properly invoked inasmuch as 32G proceedings were initiated in the year 1962 and ample opportunity was given to the petitioner-Trust for making attempt to obtain exemption. The trial Court passed an order on 22nd April 1987. Thus, during all this period, the petitioner-applicant could not satisfy the authorities that the registration of the Trust subsequent to 1st April 1957 would relate back to tiller’s day. There being no such consequence provided in law, the revision application has been rightly dismissed by the Revenue Tribunal. The orders passed in that behalf require no interference as they are in consonance with the materials produced and cannot be termed as perverse. Each of these writ petitions, therefore, stand dismissed but without any order as to costs. 3 wp8127-8105.doc (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)