MC 1228/2008 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI Heard Ms S Seal, learned counsel for the applicant. None has ap peared on behalf of the Opp. party/writ petitioner. In support of the prayer made for vacation/modification and/or a lteration of the interim order dated 10.4.2008, the learned counsel for the appl icant has submitted that by the aforesaid interim order a blanket restraint has been put by the court on filling up of different categories of posts mentioned i n the notice dated 1.4.2008 (Annexure-5 to the writ petition) though the petitio ners have applied for only one category of posts i.e. Assistant Inspector of Exc ise. Accordingly, the learned counsel has submitted that the interim order date d 10.4.2008 may be suitably modified. On due perusal of the pleadings contained in the writ petition, it is evident that the petitioners are aspirants for the post of Assistant Inspe ctor of Excise. By the notice dated 1.4.2008 several other categories of posts were also intended to be filled-up. In the above facts and circumstances, the Court is of the view t hat the interim order dated 10.4.2008 should be suitably modified to mean that f urther steps pursuant to the notice dated 1.4.2008 (Annexure-5 to the writ petit ion) in so far as the posts of Assistant Inspector of Excise is concerned, shall not be taken by the respondents without leave of the Court. Misc. case stands closed in terms of the above.