(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3171 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3171 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3171 OF 2005 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 35024 OF 2003 FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 35024 OF 2003 FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 35024 OF 2003 Union of India & Anr ...Applicants Versus M/s. Apeego Corp. Ltd. ...Respondent ..... Shri. Y.R. Mishra with T.C. Kaushik, counsel for the Applicant ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED: 5TH DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 5TH DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 5TH DECEMBER, 2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant. None appears for the Respondent though served. 2. For the reasons stated in the Civil Application, sufficient cause is made out. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide. Hence, Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Place Appeal for admission on 19.12.2005. *****