rd7p] -mill % 22.07.2010 Present: Mr. Vikas Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pawan BahI, APP for the State. +Crl.M.A.No. 12515/2010 (exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. Bail AppI. No. 1254/2010 This is an application for anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 87/2010 under Section 395 IPC, P.S. Mandir Marg. Learned counsel for the petitioner has taken me through the FIR as well as bail order passed by Sh. S.P.Garg, Additional Sessions Judge and submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and though the other four co-accused persons were arrested on the same day, he could not be arrested. It is submitted that the petitioner has nothing to do with the incident. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the anticipatory bail. He submits that the charge against the petitioner is of serious nature and he is required for custodial interrogation. As per the FIR, he was not known to the complainant, as such his custody would be required for holding the Test Identification Parade to fix his identity. The case is at the stage of investigation. Allegations against the petitioner are of serious nature and in view of the submissions made on behalf of the State, at this stage, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Application is dismissed. Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified (0 At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that date for Test Identification Parade be fixed and petitioner will surrender one day before the Test Identification Parade. In view of the above submission, it is directed that on the petitioner surrendering before the police/court, the Investigating Officer shall move an application for TIP within two days of his surrender. Petition is disposed of accordingly. ",.V - AJIT BHARIHOKE (JUDGE) JULY 22, 2010 akb V