IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 6827/2009 Pappu vs. State of Rajasthan Dated : 11.09.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH BHAGWATI Mr. R.S. Tanwar, for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor for the State. This order governs the disposal of bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. by Mr. R.S. Tanwar Advocate on behalf of the applicant Pappu pertaining to F.I.R. No. 102/2009 of Police Station Sawar, District Ajmer, in the offences under Sections 379, 411 and 413 of IPC. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has canvassed that the main accused of this case are Ramratan and Parmeshwar, from whose possession, the motor-cycle are alleged to have been recovered on 21.07.2009 at 10:10 am at Balpura Triangle. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has been in custody since 1.5.2009, hence, he may be granted indulgence of bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail petition on the ground that one motor- cycle is alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner Pappu. He had no papers of this motor-cycle with him. He has further contended that the incidents of motor- cycle theft in the city are on high rise. To curb the theft of motor-cycles in the cities, it is necessary to deal with the criminals sternly, hence, the petitioner may be denied bail. 5. Having considered the submissions made at the bar and scanned the relevant material on record, it is noticed that the spate of theft of motor-cycles has multiplied during last month in the city and such incidents of theft are on high rise, hence, with a view to put a check on it, it becomes necessary to exhibit serious concern. So far as the disposal of this bail petition is concerned, I without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, do not feel inclined to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioner and the bail petition deserves to be dismissed. 6. In the result, the bail petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the accused-petitioner Pappu stands dismissed. (MAHESH BHAGWATI)J. Mak/- 8