IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 55 OF 2008 REVISION APPLICATION NO. 55 OF 2008 REVISION APPLICATION NO. 55 OF 2008 Francis Xavier .. Petitioner V/s. Krishna Deju Shetty & Ors. .. Respondent Shri V.P. Sawant i/by Shri S.B. Deshpande for the Petitioner Shri Uttam G. Tahiliani and Smt. Laveena B. Makhijani for Respondent No. 1 to 3. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 5TH JUNE, 2008. P.C. : . The impugned order does not warrant any interference. The action of repairing the wall is not contrary to the decree passed in favour of the Petitioner on 4th December, 2003. There is an access to his premises. That the other tenants by parking their vehicles wrongly, cause inconvenience to the petitioner, is another matter for which, the petitioner ought to take appropriate steps. 2. It would not permissible to order a breach in the wall for his convenience. If it is found that the defendants were in fact disturbing the plaintiff / petitioner from the benefit of the decree, that is another matter. 3. If the wall has been repaired / constructed / reconstructed without necessary permission, it is a matter for the concerned authorities to take necessary action. The Civil Revision Application is dismissed.