HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.18934 of 2007 Date: September 10, 2007 Between: Sri Yedida Gopala Satyanarayana. … Petitioner And 1. The Endowments Department, rep. By the Regional Joint Commissioner, Multi Zone-1, Kakinada, East Godavari District and 3 others. … Respondents * * * ORDER: The matter is coming up for admission. The writ petition is filed for a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the impugned orders of the 1st respondent in Revision Petition No.383/2005, dated 06.02.2006, in confirming the orders passed by the 2nd respondent in O.A.No.87/1999, dated 01.02.2005, as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to the provisions of A.P. Charitable and Hindu Religious and Endowments Act 30/1987 (for short ‘the Act’) and consequently set aside the impugned orders in Revision Petition No.383/2005, dated 06.02.2006, and pass such other suitable orders. 2. It is not in serious controversy that the petitioner is having a remedy by way of revision to the Government under Section 93 of the Act. No doubt, several factual details had been narrated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition commencing from paras 2 to 8 of the affidavit. In view of the fact that the petitioner is having remedy by way of revision, this court is not inclined to express any opinion touching merits and demerits of the matter and liberty is given to the petitioner to avail alternative remedy as referred to supra. 8. Accordingly the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ____________________ (P.S.NARAYANA, J.) Date: September 10, 2007. BSB