IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44228 of 2010 1. MD GULAB, SON OF LATE IBRAHIM 2. SHAHJADI KHATOON, WIFE OF MD. GULAB Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act. It has been submitted that the petitioners are parents-in-law of the deceased and there is no specific overt act against them as also that it is not a case under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code where the question of presumption would arise. Considering the same, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Samastipur, in Sessions Trial No. 413 of 2010 arising out of Tajpur Bangra P.S. Case No. 64 of 2010 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about 2 any change in address of the petitioners. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)