THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 22779 OF 2009 Dated 12th July, 2010 Between: Lakkineni Sathish …Petitioner And The Director General of Police and Five others …Respondents The Court made the following ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks directions by way of Mandamus to declare the action of respondents 4 and 5 in interfering with the civil disputes pending between him and respondent No.6 by calling him and his family members to the police station and harassing them as illegal and arbitrary. The case of the petitioner is that he is a resident of Kalluru Village, Khammam District and owns certain agricultural lands. Due to his personal needs, he wanted to sell those lands. Respondent No.6 entered into an agreement of sale with the petitioner on 24.05.2006 to purchase an extent of Acs.21.00 and paid some amount towards advance and fixed six months time for registration after paying the remaining balance amount. It is further stated that respondent No.6 failed to pay the balance amount and that without paying the same, he is insisting the petitioner for registration of the land in his favour. The allegation of the petitioner is that, at the instance of respondent No.6, respondents 4 and 5 are coercing him to execute the registered sale deed in favour of respondent No.6 and harassing him and his family members by unnecessarily calling them to the police station. Though no counter-affidavit is filed, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home placed before the Court letter dated 26.10.2009 addressed by the Station House Officer, Kalluru Police Station, Khammam District - respondent No.5 to the Office of the Government Pleader for Home, wherein it is stated that respondents 3 to 5 at no point of time harassed the petitioner and his family members by interfering in the civil disputes; that they did not call the petitioner to the police station and that the petitioner never approached the respondents-Police with any report against respondent No.6. In view of the specific assertions of respondent No.5, in his letter dated 26.10.2009, that the respondents-Police are not interfering with the alleged civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.6 and that they never called the petitioner to the police station, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition by placing on record the said statement. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J Dated 12th July, 2010 vrn