IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22987 of 2010 BABLU PASWAN SON OF SRI DASO PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 26.8.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner was refused bail earlier by an order dated 23.3.2010 vide Cr.Misc.No.6025 of 2010. The petitioner is admittedly not named in the first information report but subsequently it transpired that the services of some anti social elements were hired to execute the murder of the two sons of the informant for reasons of land dispute. The petitioner and co- accused Bablu Sah were assigned role of keeping a watch on the two deceased, whereafter they were shot dead by the co-accused Chhotiya and Samiya. Considering that there is active participation of the petitioner and I have already refused bail to the petitioner earlier, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is once again rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )