t ^? l' 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) W.P. (S) No. ^^G\ / 2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS: (1) .A^f^ " ..^i^" ^/nc>>'9 <^y ^ Laxmi Prasad Ahirwar, S/o. Late Pannalal Ahinvar, aged about 44 years, Sub Divisional Agriculture Officer, Agriculture Office, Collectorate Premises, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh through its Secretaiy, Agriculture Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director, Agriculture, Directorate of Agriculture, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Premises, Labhandi, Raipur (C.G.) ^ ^\t:'i (3) Dy. Director, Office of Dy. Director, Agriculture, Raipur (C.G.) ^' (4) Swatantra Kumar Verma, Asstt. Director, Agriculture, Office of Dy. Director, Agriclture, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ss^, HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.5661 OF 2010 PETITIONER Laxmi Prasad Ahirwar RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- 5. 6. Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitioner, Shri A.V. Sridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 24th day of January, 2011) Heard learned counsel for the parties. Case of the petitioner is that the petitioner by order dated 15-7-2010 (Annexure - P/8) was transferred to the office of Deputy Director (Agriculture), Raipur, and thereafter, the petitioner joined the office. Subsequently, after a period of two months one more order was passed modifying the earlier order dated 15-7-2010 on 22-9-2010 whereunder the petitioner was transferred as Sub Divisional Officer (Agriculture), Bhilaigarh, Raipur. Thus, thi^ petition on the ground that once the order has been complied with; the same can neither be cancelled nor amended without pa^sing a fresh order. This Court having considered all the aspects of the matter by order dated 1-10-2010 granted status quo as on that day. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is still continuing at the old place of posting i.e. in the office of Deputy Director (Agriculture), Raipur. At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the State may be granted liberty to pass appropriate orders keeping in view public interest and administrative exigency. Shri Sridjiar, learned Panel Lawyer further submits that the State shall not insist upon compliance of the impugned order dated 22-9-2010 (Annexure P/1). In view of the above, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. _ Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge