1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application No. 573 of 2007 in Writ Petition No. 5015 of 2006 (D) (Aasaram Puna Jadhav .vs. State & Ors.) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- =- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CORAM : D.D.Sinha and R.V.More, JJ. DATE : December 14, 2007. Heard Mr. Kilor, Adv. for the Applicant, Mr.Thakre, Assistant Government Pleader for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Mr.Sohoni, Adv. for the Respondent No.5. Civil Application No.573 of 2007 is moved by the Original Petitioner in Writ Petition No. 5015 of 2006 for speaking to minutes in respect of the order dt. 27.11.2006 passed in said Writ Petition. Counsel for the petitioner states that, in the last para of the order, this Court has observed that the respondent no.2 is directed to look into the matter forthwith. Counsel for the petitioner has contended that this Court inadvertently mentioned the word 'petitioner' instead of 'respondent no.5' and therefore, prayed 2 that Office may be directed to carry out appropriate correction. Respective counsel for the respondents do not dispute the factual aspect of the matter. In the backdrop of the above referred situation, the Civil Application is allowed. Office is directed to substitute the word 'petitioner' by the word 'respondent no.5' in the last paragraph which is referred to hereinabove. With this direction to the Office, the Civil Application is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE ssj