IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27407 of 2009 DILIP MANDAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 6 16.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, complainant and the State. Love of complainant’s daughter and petitioner was accepted by their family members for marrying that also in the year 1996. Continuation of demand which only is reason for torture is not possible rather it is the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that complainant’s daughter deserted the petitioner rather married another person. So there was no response on her behalf while an attempt was made by this Court to reconcile the differences. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in Complaint Case No. 2 C.A.294/97, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)