IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 10903 of 2008 Between: 1 Bojja Tirupathi S/o. Mallaiah 2 Bojja Ravinder S/o. Mallaiah 3 Challa Venkatesham S/o. Mallaiah 4 Bojja Kanukaraju S/o. Amaraiah 5 Bojja Vodaiah S/o. Gattaiah 6 Bojja Narayana S/o. Venkataiah 7 Bojja Srinivas S/o. Venkataiah 8 Bojja Rayamallu S/o. Rajaiah 9 Bojja Narsingam S/o. Rajaiah ..... Petitioners AND 1 The Asst. Director of Fisheries / Ex-Officio Dy. Registrar of Coop. Societies, Karimnagar. 2 The Fishermen Coop. Society, Chamanpalli Village, Karimnagar Mandal and District, Rep. by its Vice President. .....Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or writs, order or direction, declaring and setting aside the order dt. 13.5.2008 in Lr. No.1053/C/2005 on the file of the first respondent, as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction; Award costs The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed herein, and the order of the High Court dated: 22-5-2009 made in WPMP. No. 14206 of 2008, and dt 6-7-2009 made herein, and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N.Sridhar Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Asst. G.P. for Fisheries, for the Respondent No.1, the Court made the following ORDER: “On the last occasion i.e., on 06-07-2009, this Court directed respondent No.1, namely the Assistant Director of Fisheries, Karimnagar to appear before this Court along with the record as to the steps taken by him as to amending the bye-law, as suggested by the Government. Today, it is represented by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Fisheries, that the said directions of this Court were communicated to respondent No.1 by way of a letter, but inspite of it, respondent No.1 neither appeared with the record nor given any instructions. In the circumstances, Registry is directed to issue notice to respondent No.1 to show cause as to why suo-moto contempt proceedings should not be initiated against him. List the matter after two weeks.” ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1 The Asst. Director of Fisheries / Ex-Officio Dy. Registrar of Coop. Societies, Karimnagar. 2 The Vice President, Fishermen Coop. Society, Chamanpalli Village, Karimnagar Mandal and District 3. The Section Officer, O.S. Section, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. 3. One CC to Sri N.Sridhar Reddy, Advocate (OPUC) 4. Two CCs to Asst. G.P. for Fisheries, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT) 5. One Spare Copy AB HIGH COURT AB DRAFTED ON 14-07-2009 NVRJ DATE: 13-7-2009 ORDER WP. NO. 10903 OF 2008 DIRECTION