IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.54999 of 2007 SAHNAZ BANO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 2/7/2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner, State and for the opposite parties. In this application for cancellation of bail to opposite parties No. 2 to 5, the submission is that their prayer for anticipatory bail was rejected earlier in Cr. Misc. No. 15786 of 2007 on 12.4.2007. Concealing the same, a fresh application was filed as Cr. Misc. 34364 of 2007 when an incorrect statement was made in paragraph-7 of not having moved the Court earlier. Anticipatory bail then came to be granted to opposite parties on 9.8.2007. Learned counsel for the opposite parties very fairly does not dispute the aforesaid factual position, but relics upon the observations with regard to them in both the orders to submit that the Court may not exercise its jurisdiction to cancel their bail bonds. This Court finds it difficult to accede to the prayer on behalf of the opposite parties in view of the admitted position of incorrect statement having been made in Cr. Misc. 34364 of 2007, this Court has little option but to cancel their bail bonds for the said reason alone. However, this Court considers it necessary to observe that in Cr. Misc. No. 15786 of 2007, it has been observed that - 2 - the allegation was primarily against the husband. In Cr. Misc. 34364 of 2007, it has also been observed that the allegation against the present opposite parties were general and omnibus and that the husband was already in custody. In any application for regular bail on behalf of the opposite parties the aforesaid aspects shall be duly kept in mind by the court below and the law laid down by this Court for grant of bail in matters under Section 498A which shall then be decided in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the present order. The anticipatory bail granted to the opposite parties in 34364 of 2007 is hereby cancelled. They are directed to surrender and seek regular bail. S.Ali (Navin Sinha, J.)