IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. M No. 16331 of 2010 Date of Decision: July 12, 2010 Rampal and others ...........Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another ..........Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sabina Present: Mr.R.M. Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Satyaveer Singh Yadav, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana ** Sabina, J. Petitioners have filed this petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to them in the event of appearance of the petitioners before the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Meham on the date fixed and the complaint and summoning order dated 10.2.2010 (Annexures P1 and P2 ) passed by it be quashed. At the time of issuance of notice of motion on28.5.2010, the following order was passed by this Court:- ““Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the investigation was conducted by the police during the pendency of the complaint and the allegations levelled by the complainant were found to be false but despite the said fact, summoning order has been passed against the petitioners. Crl. Misc. M No. 16331 of 2010 (O&M) -2- Notice of motion for 12.7.2010.. In the meantime, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial Court and the trial Court shall release the petitioner on interim bail subject to its satisfaction.” Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in terms of the above order, petitioner has surrendered before the trial Court and has furnished the interim bail. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, interim bail furnished by the petitioner in terms of the order of this Court dated 28.5.2010 is made absolute. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (Sabina) Judge July 12, 2010 arya