SB : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITIN 09. 12.2910 Shri Somkant Verma, counsel or the petitioner. he State. Shri Praveen Das, Dy. G‘A. for GrieVance of the petitioner in respondents may pass the recovery order against the petitioner for making the excess payment and if any such order is passed, petitioner will suffer an irreparable 10s has Counsel for the State points out that till date no order been passed for recovery and merely on the basis of apprehension 3t maintainable. petitioner submits that the ends tioner is permitted to withdraw representation before the resp, 1e said respondent. Accordingly, the petitioner i petition with the aforesaid liberty, Ir such representation by the petitioner from the date of receipt of copy of thi shall decide the same in an obiective 1 it is made clear that this Cour on merits of the case and the authori to decide the representation strii considering all the aspects of the case S. this petition has been filed which is n< In View of this, counsel for the of justice would be served if the pet- this petition with liberty to make a No.3 and direction may be issued to t this 5 permitted to withdraw i the eventuality of making any within a period of three weeks s. order, the authority concerned nafln€f. t has not expressed any opinion ty concerned would be at liberty law, :tly in accordance with Sd/- aker Judge Pritinker DIW the