IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 20706 of 2006 Between: 1 Aripi Vallaiah, s/o Subba Rao, r/o 1-28, Vuyyur Village & Mandal, Krishna District. 2 Aripi Satyanarayana, s/o Subba Rao, r/o Gandikunta Village, Vuyyur Mandal, Krishna District. 3 Aripi Chinthaiah, s/o Subba Rao, r/o Katur Village, Vuyyur Mandal, Krishna District. 4 Jonnalagadda Katam Raju, s/o Subba Rao, r/o Vuyyuru Village & Mandal, Krishna District. 5 Jonnalagadda Pitcheswara Rao, s/o Seshagiri Rao, r/o Vuyyuru Village & Mandal, Krishna District. 6 Aripi Subba Rao, s/o Somaiah, r/o Mudunur Village, Vuyyuru Mandal, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Commissioner, Civil Supplies, Government of A.P., Erramanzil, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Krishna at Machilipatnam. 3 The Joint Collector, Krishna District at Machilipatnam. 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Vuyyuru Mandal, Krishna District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing Circular in Rc.A1/43/2006, dated 7-9-2006 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art.19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the orders of the 3rd respondent passed in Circular Rc.No.A1/43/2006, dated 7-9-2006 and pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.VENGALA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: When the matter was called on 28.7.2008, neither were the petitioners present nor was there any representation on their behalf. Accordingly, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, when the matter is taken up, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. The Writ Petition is therefore dismissed for default. The interim order granted by this Court on 29.9.2006 stands dissolved. There shall be no order as to costs. GODA RAGHURAM, J Date: 29.7.2008 cvm