<^p l.w^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISHGARH AT BILASPURIC.G.l WRIT PETITION (C( N0. 205 /2007 PETITIONER: - ^^^ \y Ramashankar Singh sovf^oi Late Ambika Singh, retired Upper Divisional Clerk aged about 66 years, R/o. Ward No. /^7, Manendragarh, Near Vijay Nursery School, Post and Tehsil Manendragarh, Dist. Koria (C.G.) \^-w^' ....^^r 2. ,^' o^ ^y' » Amresh Singh sol,u^| ^u<-^rl( Ramashankar Singh^fR/o^Ward No. 17, Manendragarh, Near Vijay Nursery School, Post and Tehsil Manendragarh, Dist. Koria (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT: -- .r^1'" r".' ^ ^ ^ ^^^- >^ \^ .^' 2, 3. 4. 5.. 4- State of Chhattisgarh, through The Secretary, Revenue , D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Collector, Koria Baikunthpur, Dist. Koria (C.G.) Sub-Divisional Officer, Revenue Manendragarh, Tehsil- Manendragarh, Dist-Koria (C.G.) Sub-Divisional Officer, PWD, Manendragarh, Tehsil- Manendragarh, Dist-Koria (C.G.) Tehsildar, Manendragarh, Tehsil- Manendragarh, Dist-Koria (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22i^OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HI6H 03UKT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W.P (S) No. 285 of 2007 Sii^le BenchiHon'ble Shri Satish K. ^nihotri, J. Petitioners Respondents Versus Ramashankar Singh ond another State of Chhtittisgu-h and another Present: E)r. N.K. Shukla, Senior Advocate with Mr. A.K. ycdav, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Utkarsh Verma, beputy ©ovt.Advocate for the State/respondents. ORbER »nd (Passed on 22"a Day of February, 2007} Learned couiKel oppearing for the petitioners submits that fhjs petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India be treated as the petition under Artieie 227 of the Constitution of India. It is ordered accordingly. 2. Learned counsel <ippeorin9 for 1he petitioners further submits that the petitioners are willing to vaeate the premises without prejudice to their rights ond contentions in the pending proceedings. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instructiore, sifcmits thart the petitioners moy be granted fow months time to vaccrt'e the premises, to which leamed cotaisel appearirg for the respondents/State has no <A>jection. 4. Having regard to ttie focts and circumstances of the case,the prayed is allowed. The petitioners are graited four months time to vaeate the disputed premises, sifcject to filin9 of 01 imdertoking, stating thot the vacant ond peaceful possessiai of the disputed (remises shatl be handed ovar to ths respondents/State within four months from todoy. •/ 5. The petitioners shall in the meantime, not crecrte emy third party right <»• interest in the disputed premises. The soid imderi'aking shatl be filed before the Civil Judge Ctass II, Manendr<garh, Distriet-Koric in the motter Civi! Suit No. 29A/2006 (Ramashcnker Sirgh Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others) within a period of three weeks. 6. For the reosons stated hereinobove, the writ petition is disposed of with above stated liberty. hk> order os to costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge SiAhash