IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.BHAVANI PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO : 18926 of 2000 Between: M.Bharathi Devi D/o M.Venkaiah Grade-I Telugu Pandit, ZP High School ,Kaikaram West Godavari Dist ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Chief Executive Officer Zilla Parishad, Eluru, W.G.District 2 The District Educational officer Eluru, West Godavari Dist 3 The Regional Joint Director of School Education Kakinada, East Godavari District 4 The Parishad Educational Officer Zilla Parishad, Eluru, West Godavari District 5 The Headmaster, Zilla Parishad, High School Kaikaram 6 The Registar, A.P. Administrative Tribunal , Hyderabad .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issued a Writ or Order or Direction more inthe nature of Mandamus declaring the proceedings No. D-6/360/97 dt. 20/01/1997 issued by 1st respondent and the connected and consequential orders in proceedings No. D-6/360/97 dt. 27/12/1997 issued by the 4th respondent and other orders and the judgement of the Tribunal in OA.No. 3090/98 ddt. 22/01/1999 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21, 39 (d) of Constitutions of India besides being void and unteable inlay by holding the petitioner is entitled to be treated as regularly appointed by absorption as Grade-I Telugu Pandit vide Rc.No. D6-5236/87 dt. 6/05/1987 as legal and valid and in order and binding on the respondent and pass such other order or orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.D.LINGA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.BHAVANI PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO : 18926 of 2000 JUDGMENT (Per BPR,J) On 22.10.2009 when the matter is taken up, none appeared for the petitioner, even today counsel for petitioner requested for an adjournment. However, having gone through the papers, it is found that the petitioner has already attained the age of superannuation and nothing survives in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. _______________ B.PRAKASH RAO,J _________________ G.BHAVANI PRASAD,J DATE:26.10.2009 tvk THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.BHAVANI PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO : 18926 of 2000 Date: 26.10.2009