IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 2ND SEPTEMBER 2008 / 11TH BHADRA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 494 of 2007() ----------------------------- CRA.644/2003 of II ADDL.SESSIONS COURT, KOZHIKODE CC.189/2001 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-III, KOZHIKODE .................... REVN. PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED: ----------------------------------------------- SREERAJ M.S., S/O. SREEDHARAN, MELEEDA VEETTIL HOUSE, KRISHNAPILLA MANDIRAM, PAVAMANI ROAD, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.P.S.SREEDHARAN PILLAI SMT.C.G.PREETHA RESPONDENT/RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT: --------------------------------------------------- 1. THADAMURIYIL CHITS & FINANCE COMPANY PVT. LTD., REGISTERED OFFICE NO. 19/2002 A5, A7, E.K.P. COMPLEX, KALLAI ROAD, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, JOJI VARGHESE, S/O. VARGHESE, 'JYOTHSNA', MANKAVU, KOZHIKODE-7 2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI. C.M. NAZER, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.JACOB ABRAHAM FOR R.1 THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: CRL.R.P.NO. 494/2007 : 2 : ORDER ON Crl.M.A. NO. 1448/2006 IN CRL.R.P.NO. 494/2007 DISMISSED 02.09.2008 sd/- V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. V. RAMKUMAR, J. ........................................... Crl.R.P. No. 494 of 2007 ........................................... Dated this the 2nd day of September, 2008. ORDER The accused in C.C. No. 189 of 2001 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-III, Kozhikode for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed against him concurrently by the courts below. 2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter. Crl.M.A.No. 8854 of 2008 has been filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 seeking permission to record the composition entered into between the revision petitioner and the complainant. The said petition has been signed by both the revision petitioner as well as the complainant and their respective counsels. In the light of this development, the aforementioned composition is recorded and it will have the effect of an acquittal of the revision petitioner within the meaning of Sec. 320 (8) Cr.P.C. This Crl. R.P. is disposed of as above. Dated this the 2nd day of September, 2008. V. RAMKUMAR,JUDGE. rv