IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 19TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 28TH BHADRA 1933 RP.No. 663 of 2011(K) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.19303/2011 Dated 15/07/2011 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONERS --------------------------------- 1. P.T.NAZAR, S/O.THANGAL KUNJU LEBBA, AGED 52 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, SOFI BEAUTY PALACE, ROOM NO.52, SOUTH OF MULLAKKAL TEMPLE, ALAPPUZHA. 2. RASEENA NAZAR, W/O.NAZAR, AGED 47 YEARS, SOFI BEAUTY PALACE, ROOM NO.52, SOUTH OF MULLAKKAL TEMPLE, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.P.KRISHNA KUMAR (ALAPPUZHA) RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. UNION BANK OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, MULLACKAL, ALAPPUZHA - 688 001. 2. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, UNDER SARFAESI ACT, (CHIEF MANAGER), UNION BANK OF INDIA, KOTTAYAM BRANCH CSI SQUARE, KOTTAYAM 686001. ADV.A.S.P. KURUP, SC THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.P.No. 663/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS Annexure A1 COPY OF THE RECEIPT. Annexure A2. COPY OF THE MEDICAL RECORDS OF P1. sdk+ ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== R.P.No. 663 of 2011 ================== Dated this the 19th day of September, 2011 O R D E R The petitioners in this review petition are the petitioners in W.P. (C).No.19303/2011. In that writ petition, by judgment dated 15.7.2011, I directed the respondents to permit the petitioners to pay the outstanding amounts in eight equal monthly instalments. The petitioners seek review of the same on the ground that after the petitioners paid the first instalment, the 1st petitioner had to undergo an urgent heart surgery, for which, they had to spend substantial amounts, as a result of which, the petitioners could not pay the next instalment. 2. This is opposed by the learned counsel for the bank. 3. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, I direct that the balance instalments shall be paid starting from 1.12.2011. All other conditions in the judgment would stand. The review petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge