CWP(T) No. 15434 of 2008 3.03.2011 Present: Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Vinod Thakur, Dy. A.G. for the respondents/State. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner he had completed nine years of uninterrupted continuous service in the year 2004. It is the stand of the respondents that services of the petitioner stand regularised w.e.f. 22.12.2006. The dispute is pertaining only with regard to the period of two years prior to his regularisation. From the affidavit it is not clear as to whether prior to the regularisation of the petitioner any vacancy was in existence. Hence respondents are directed to look into the matter in accordance with law and accord benefit of regularisation policy subject to the post being available. Decision pertaining to eligibility and admissibility of consequential benefits, if any, be also taken within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. With these directions the present petition is disposed of. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. March 3, 2011 (PK)