Date r % Orders ^ .".IN ,TKE••HI€p:::P6URT^Or^Bfe AT^'NEW^ + • RC,$!a 5/2004 &CM.AITC.5^56/2004.' ; •; : % ABDUL lATIF'. & • ;.. ' ' • ,', •• Appellants . •• Through Mr.Ri^ Kumar Sehra:Vvat>^ Advocate,. versus SPIAI-IIDAN BEGUM ' ...... Respondent Through Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.S. SODHI ORDER 17.09.2004 ••• > This appeal is directed against the Judgment dated 19.2.2004 of the Additional Rent Control Tribunal, Delhi whereby the learned Additional Rent Control Tribunal dismissed / the appeal of appellant herein which appeal arose out of the order of the Addihonal Rent Controller, Delhi vide the learned Additional Rent Controller dismissed the application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC moved by the respondent herein for setting aside the ex-pare order dated 18.11.1987. With the assistance of counsel for ihe appellant, Thave SHRI SHYAM SALES 02-03 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified H.C.D.-1 (a) Continuation Sheet St/^o. Date Orders :2: gone through the record of the case and the judgment under challenge. T am satisfied that the judgment under challenge suffers from no infirm perversity, impropriety, ,illegality or jurisdictional error. RC.S.A. 5/2004 & CM.APPL.5456/2004 are dismissed. SEPTEMBER 17, 2004 bp R.S. SODm, J