1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Letters Patent Appeal No.52 of 2010 in Writ Petition No. 4617 of 2002 (D) Indira Dnyan Prasarak Mandal and another ...VERSUS.. The Presiding Officer, Addl. School Tribunal, Chandrapur and others =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==- Mr. S.V.Manohar, ADvocate for the appellants. Mr. Bhushan Mohta, Adv. H/f Mr. Anand Parchure, Advocate for R.No.2 Mr. S.B.Ahirkar, A.G.P. for Respondent no.3 C ORAM : D.B.BHOSALE ; and PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATED : 16th August, 2010. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the parties have amicably settled their all disputes and they have tendered a ‘Compromise Petition’ dated 16/8/2010, duly signed by them and the parties. In the circumstances, Admit. The compromise petition is taken on record and marked as “X” for identification. The statements made and the undertakings given, if any, in the compromise petition by the parties are accepted. The appellant management shall forward the proposal for approval to the appointment of respondent no.2, as provided for in the compromise petition, within a period of four weeks from today. 2 Respondent no.3 – Education Officer (Sec.), Zilla Parishad, Chandrapur shall decide the proposal, that will be forwarded by the appellant management seeking approval of the respondent no.2’s appointment, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the proposal. It is needless to state that the respondent no.3 shall decide the proposal in accordance with law and in the light of the orders passed by the School Tribunal as well as by this Court in Writ Petition No. 4617 of 2002. With these observations, the Letters Patent Appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise petition. It is made clear that the order dated 18/6/2009, passed in Writ Petition No. 4617 of 2002, which is impugned in this Letters patent Appeal is confirmed, subject to the terms and conditions of the compromise petition. JUDGE JUDGE Diwale