IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 2187 OF PETITION NO. 2187 OF PETITION NO. 2187 OF 2005. 2005. 2005. Chief Officer, Karmala Nagar Parishad & anr. ... Petitioner. V/s. Vithal Shankar Jadhav ... Respondent. Shri M.S. Kumthekar for the petitioner. Shri Rajesh Tekale for the respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. : V.C.DAGA, J. : V.C.DAGA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 21.12.2005. : 21.12.2005. : 21.12.2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : ---- ---- ---- . Heard rival parties. 2. No case is made out to interfere with the impugned order since petitioner has suffered concurrent findings of fact based on evidence. The impugned order cannot be said to be a perverse order. This Court, not being a Court of appeal, is not expected to reappreciate evidence in writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, so as to dislodge the finding recorded by both the Courts below. Petition is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.