emrrxgmm—:A x w... IGH CQURT OF CHEATTI$GARH AT BILASPUR ‘Writ Petitian ($2) N0. 2896 (if2W8 (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon‘hle Mr. Satish K. Agnihatl‘i, J.) Préseitt : Shri Anil Motuya, Advocate for this petitionor. Miss Suniia Jain, Panel Lawyar for the State/respondents. QRAL ORDER (Fassea on 13‘“ day 0r June, 2003) Viith the congén’r of the parties, the matter is takeil up for boating finaily. 1. The petitioner was appointed as Assistant Teak-her on §xad pay of'Rs. 100!-.' Atter completion of two yoars of probation period, he was . granted regular pay scale. Learned cotmsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the case is asto whether, the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date initial appointment or after completion ofprobation period. The issue involved, herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State go Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpnr in 0A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of MP. & others), wherein it was held that the similarly ‘situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. The matter was takeii up to _. \p x ‘r ,A A H PETITIONER _ t Rohit Kumar Behra, S/o Shn' Hari Ram Behra, aged about 55 years. Assistant Teacher. Government Primary School, Kudharipara (Tamnar), Black Tamnar, District Raigarh (CGL I . VERSUS RESPQNDENTS ‘.' l. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Educatien ’ Department. DKS Bhawan; Raipur (CG). 2. District Education Ofiicer, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG). 3. Block Education Officer, Tamnar, District Raigarh (CG). v 09?; 7! Q( Hon‘b!e Sztpreme Caurt in Spacia! Leave PetitiOn (Civil) No. 6892/93. The said petition was dismissed, by the Ham'bie Supremg Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the TeachersfAssistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from date of initial appointment. . In View of the above stated submissions made by learnedeounsel for the paities, the writ petition is disposed of in the same terms i.e. the petitioner is granted liberty to ma. e e representation, if so advised, to consider his ease, if he stands on the same footings as per order dated 24.08.1992 by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunai, Jabaipur, in O.A. No. 2745 of 89 Madhukant Yadu mgvra) and subsequently confirmed by order dated 03.01.1994 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93 and grant relief accordingly. . In view of the foregoing, this petition is disposed of. No order asto costs. Sci/- .Satish K. Agnih otri Judge \