Crl. Misc. No. M-7373 of 2011 (O&M) [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-7373 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 19,2011 Dr. Deepti Dhingra and another .................. Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another ................ Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Vikrant Hooda, Advocate for the petitioners. ... RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) The petitioners have sought quashing of FIR No. 546 dated 14.12.2010 under Sections 323, 324, 506 IPC registered at Police Station Urban Estate Rohtak. There is a matrimonial dispute between petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 and this FIR has been registered as a result of on-going matrimonial dispute between the parties. After investigation, challan has been presented. Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to Crl. Misc. No. M-7373 of 2011 (O&M) [ 2 ] withdraw the present petition to take all the pleas before the trial Court. Allowed to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn. Personal appearance of petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 before the trial Court is exempted subject to the following conditions:- (i) petitioner shall be represented through counsel; (ii) shall not delay/stall the trial proceedings; (iii) shall not dispute his identity as an accused; (iv) shall have no objection if the prosecution evidence is recorded in his absence but in the presence of his counsel; (v) shall appear before the trial Court as and when required by the trial Court; and (vi) any other condition which the learned trial Court may impose. 19.4.2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Rupi JUDGE