IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27245 of 2008 MITHILESH SINGH @ KIRANI BABU Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.30867 of 2008 LALJIT RAJBANSHI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 8.9.2008 Heard. The petitioners being not named in the FIR in a case under Section 302 IPC appear implicated by one Puniya Devi whose statement was recorded in the case diary. The contention is that the mother of the deceased in her further statement in paragraph 13 has painted the picture of the deceased and on consideration of the same, he appears thoroughly a bad character. In spite of being married, was running a brothel in his house, very much in presence of his wife. The case diary and its different paragraphs have been read out to me and I do not find that there was any circumstance appearing against the accused persons which could justify the finding recorded by the learned Judge dismissing the prayer without discussing the contents of any of the paragraphs of the case. I have granted bail to similarly situated accused Suju Singh and Ranjit Pandit passed in Cr.Misc. Petitions no.8956 and 18411 both of 2008. Let the above named two petitioners be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Nawadah in Rajauli P.S.Case no.125 of 2007. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )