IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 24574 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 16.09.2011 Gagi Singh and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.S. Bajwa, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. ..... RAJESH BINDAL, J. While issuing of notice of motion on 16.08.2011, following contentions of learned counsel for the petitioners were noticed:- “Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that all the offences in the present FIR are bailable, ex- cept offence under Section 452 IPC. In fact, the petition- ers have been falsely implicated in this case as the com- plainant had some grudge against the brother of peti- tioner No.1.” It is not disputed by learned counsel for the State that the peti- tioners have already joined investigation. Considering the aforesaid facts, interim bail granted to the peti- tioners on 16.08.2011, is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 16.09.2011 sharmila