IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.18920 of 2009 Date of Decision.11.08.2011 Zila Parishad Gurdaspur through its Deputy Chief Executive Officer .....Petitioner Versus Lok Adalat, Gurdaspur, through its Registrar and another .....Respondents Present: Mr. Rajinder Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Addl. A.G., Punjab for respondent No.1. Mr. Deepak Arora, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Both the parties agreed that the parties have been entered into a compromise. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks for permission for withdrawal of the writ petition. 2. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn as such. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 11, 2011 Pankaj*