1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1051 OF 2008 The Estate Manager, Maharashtra State Farming Corporation. ....Petitioner vs Hira Nivrutti Pise. ....Respondent Mr. S.R. Nargolkar for the Petitioner. Ms. N.D. Buch i/b Shailesh K. More for the Respondent. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 13TH JANUARY, 2010. P.C. :- 1. Rule. By consent, rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally. 2. The impugned order sets out the facts and the rival contentions. There are no reasons whatsoever furnished in the impugned order. On this ground alone, the impugned order is liable to be set aside. 2 3. In the circumstances, the impugned order is set aside. The Industrial Court, Solapur, is directed to hear the matter afresh and pass a reasoned order in accordance with law. The Industrial Court will accord priority to the matter on the basis of the date on which the appeal is filed. 4. Writ Petition, accordingly, disposed of.