Crl. Misc. No. M-13653 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-13653 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: August 9, 2010 Sandeep ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present: Mr. Jai Vir Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Shalini Attri, DAG, Haryana. GURDEV SINGH, J. Heard. Petitioner-Sandeep, has filed the present petition under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code for grant of regular bail in FIR No. 366 dated 4.11.2008 registered at Police Station City, Palwal City, under Sections 364-A, 302 and 201/34 IPC. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that similarly situated accused; namely, Surender has been given the benefit of regular bail by this Court in Crl. Misc. No. M-35563 of 2009 decided on 12.3.2010. However, the learned State counsel has tried to repel that contention of the learned counsel by contending that from the possession of the present accused the gold ring of the deceased was recovered, which was subsequently identified by his father. In case of Surender, it was the driving licence and the purse of the deceased, which are alleged to have been recovered. Recovery of the Crl. Misc. No. M-13653 of 2010 2 gold ring is the only circumstance which has been collected by the investigating agency against the present petitioner. The case of the petitioner is on the same footing as that of Surender. In order to maintain the judicial uniformity and to prevent any kind of discrimination, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail to the satisfaction of the trial court/CJM, Palwal, subject to the following conditions:- (i) he shall not offer any any threat, promise, or inducement to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing the same to the Investigating Officer/Court; and (ii) he shall not leave the limits of this country without prior permission of the Court. August 9, 2010 (GURDEV SINGH ) prem JUDGE