HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. HON’BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. W.P. No. 984 of 2004 PETITIONER Ku. Bhagwati Sen, D/o. Narbada Prasad Sen, aged about 26 years, Advocate, R/o. Rajkishore Nagar, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENT State of Chhattisgarh, through Chief Secretary, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Present: Smt Meena Shastri, counsel for the petitioner, Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Additional Advocate General for the State. ORDER (30m March, 2009) The foliowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Learned counsel for the parties are heard. 2) Petitioner Bhagwati Sen, a practicing Advocate at Bilaspur filed this present writ petition in the year 2004 for the following reliefs: " 7.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent to enquire the entire matter relating to the lady ‘Nirmala' and her son ‘Munna' (Guddu) properly and to prosecute the responsible person immediately providing sufficient protection to that lady with her child. 7.2 That, this Hon’ble Court be pleased to direct the respondent to check and eradicate antisocial criminal activities of various kinds against woman in the state and to take immediate action about any crime against women and protect the person from starvation. f/2 7.3 This Hon’ble Court further be pleased to direct the respondent to provide, necessary and immediate sufficient medicai facilities to the lady ‘Nirmala' and her child till they became cure either concerned with physical or mental. 7.4 The Hon’ble Court also be pleased to direct the respondent to provide the facilities of food, shelter and clothing to the above stated lady ‘Nirmala’ and her son’ 7.5 This Hon'ble Court further be pleased to direct the respondent to provide appropriate livelihood to the lady and to manage her son taking in mind the appropriate welfare of the baby, if the material of the case support after making proper enquiry in the interests of justice. 7.6 Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court deem fit & proper, also be granted in favour of the lady 'Nirmala' and her son.” 3) The order dated 08.04.2004 records the statement of the Ofticers present before the Court on the said date that the Officers had taken care of Nirmala and her son Munna, she was admitted in the hospital and was under treatment at Bilaspur. 4) Thus, it is apparent that the main relief sought by the petitioner in the writ petition in View of the above development does not survive now. 5) The writ petition, thus, stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file another writ petition, if so advised/,for the reliefs sought by the petitioner in the application for‘amendment in the writ petition. 6) Consequently, MWP No.901 12004 also stands disposed of. SW- Sunit Kumar Sinha i Judge c//‘ V Sd/- €hief Justice » l a t padma fl i. l \ K