1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8/2003 Smt. Anita Parihar vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : - 2.7.2007 HON'BLE MR.PRAKASH TATIA,J. Mr.Nitin Trivedi,for the petitioner. Mrs.RR Kanwar, Addl. GA. <><><> The only relief claimed by the petitioner in the writ petition is that the respondents may be directed to finalize the pension case of the petitioner's husband Dr.Ghanshyam Parihar. The respondents have filed reply and placed on record relevant documents and submitted that the petitioner's husband's pension case has been considered by the Joint Director (Pension) and PPO, LTA, FPPO and GOP have been issued as back as on 14.1.2002 and it has also been pointed out that petitioner's husband Dr. Ghanshyam Parihar nominated his son Sh. Harakhraj Parihar and his daughter Ms. Jhilmil Parihar for the purposes of receiving the pension conversion amount. In view of the above facts it appears that petitioner's husband's pension case has been finalized and appropriate orders have already been passed, therefore, the present writ petition has become infructuous. 2 Hence, the writ petition of the petitioner is dismissed as having become infructuous. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-