IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16532 of 2010 1. MD.ANIUL HAQUE, SON OF SHIRAJ @ EJRAYAL, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA MURGIA CHAK, WARD NO.9, P.S. + DISTRICT KHAGARIA. 2. KESHWARI KHATOON, WIFE OF ANIUL HAQUE, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA MURGIA CHAK, WARD NO.9, P.S. + DISTRICT KHAGARIA. 3. SABIDA KHATOON WIFE OF SAHAJADA, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA MURGIA CHAK, WARD NO.9, P.S. + DISTRICT KHAGARIA. 4. MD. SAHAJADA, SON OF AINUL HAQUE, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA MURGIA CHAK, WARD NO.9, P.S. + DISTRICT KHAGARIA. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.20158 of 2010 MD.IMTIYAJ, SON OF MD. ANIUL HAQUE, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA MURGIA CHAK, WARD NO.9, P.S. + DISTRICT KHAGARIA. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 08.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners in the two application(s) are apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence under Section-498A and Section-4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted on their behalf that notwithstanding the allegations set out in the First Information Report they are ready and willing to continue the matrimonial relationship with the complainant and to that effect they shall file written undertaking on affidavit within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order in the court below. No sooner the aforesaid undertaking on affidavit is filed petitioners above named be admitted to the privilege of provisional bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of C.J.M./S.D.J.M., Khagaria in connection with Complaint Case No.1543C of 2008, thereafter notice be issued to the complainant and once she appears in presence of the court petitioners should persuade her to come back to the matrimonial home not only by words of mouth but also by suitable conduct and gesture, which should create confidence in her. In the event, complainant comes back to the matrimonial home or the matrimonial dispute is resolved or she is found to be unreasonable, provisional bail allowed to the petitioners be confirmed, failing which the court below should pass appropriate orders in accordance with law considering the reasonableness of the stand of the parties. The two application(s) are, accordingly, disposed of. Let this order be communicated to the court below through fax on payment of usual charges by the petitioners. Rajesh/ ( V.N.Sinha, J.)