IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 20TH JUNE 2011 / 30TH JYAISHTA 1933 RP.No. 387 of 2011(Y) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.27505/2007 Dated 19/02/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, KOTTAYAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. JAMES K.JOSEPH, S/O.LATE SRI.K.K.JOSEPH, KANNAMPADAM HOUSE, KIDANGOOR SOUTH, KOTTAYAM. 2. K.J.KURIAKOSE, S/O.LATE SRI.K.K.JOSEPH, KANNAMPADAM HOUSE, KIDANGOOR SOUTH, KOTTAYAM. 3. LAISAMMA, W/O.JAMES K.JOSEPH, KANNAMPADAM HOUSE, KIDANGOOR SOUTH, KOTTAYAM. SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ R.P.No.387 OF 2011 IN W.P.(C) NO. 27505 OF 2007 ===================== Dated this the 20th day of June, 2011 O R D E R I am not satisfied that the judgment is vitiated for any error apparent on the face of it warranting its review. On the other hand, the attempt of the review petitioners is to get the writ petition itself reheard, which is impermissible. Review petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp