IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16791 of 2009 NABI AHMAD AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS SON OF LATE MD. HUSSAIN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DEHRI, P.S. DEHRI DISTRICT ROHTAS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY TO GOVT. ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER ROADS CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT BIHAR PATNA. 4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, BHOJPUR ROAD CIRCLE ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, ARA. 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DIVISION, DEHRI-ON-SONE, DISTRICT ROHTAS. 6. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, ROHTAS AT SASARAM. 7. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, BIRCHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA ----------- 02. 03.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State as also Mr. Amarnath Singh learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Accountant General. It is submitted that for redressal of his grievances, petitioner has filed a representation before the Superintending Engineer, road Construction Department, Bhojpur on 16.12.2008 as contained in Annexure-8. The same has been remained unconsidered till date. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his claims, petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the respondent no. 4 enclosing 2 the copy of the relevant documents if any, in support of such claim along with certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks from today. In case such representation is filed, the respondent no. 4 shall consider each of the claims raised by the petitioner in his representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)