1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No.849 of 2008. [Smt. Raziya Khatoon W/o Khalid Minhas] Vs. [ President Ahebaab Education Society and others.] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances,Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri SS Deshpande, Advocate for the applicants. Coram: A. H. JOSHI, J. Dated: 25th February 2008. 1. The petitioner has not removed the office objections. By consent, the petition is called for admission hearing. 2. The petitioner who was appointed on 10-9-1996 by appointment order at page 16, the appointment order is not in the prescribed form under the rules. It is issued by the Secretary of the Society. According to the petitioner, admittedly, the petitioner was not qualified. 3. Learned Advocate Mr. S. S. Deshpande for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has acquired the qualification after entering the job. 2 4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner is not in a position to give the date when the petitioner had acquired the qualification because it has not come on record. 5. The petitioner's services were terminated orally on 27-6-1997. 6. The petitioner preferred the appeal before the School Tribunal. The Tribunal framed three compulsory issues and issue no.4 is as to termination. The petitioner has lost on issues no.2 & 3. The Tribunal held that the petitioner's appointment itself was in violation of Section 5 as well there was no approval. 7. Learned Advocate for the petitioner is not able to demonstrate as to how these findings are erroneous. It is not shown as to what was the material placed before the School Tribunal. In these circumstances, no interference is called for. Petition is dismissed. JUDGE Sbm