PE'rimleni Ne). 4 1T o! Smt. Lata Bathore, wife ‘oif Mahes umarl Rathre aed abeut26rea ai esen of Basti ’Bra ndra «Read, Dist: Bilaspur (C.G _ ). gVs. ' . state ‘of ohhattisgarh EThroug‘n: _ Secretary, Pancha‘yat Department,Raipur(CG hQhi 2. State of ChhattisgarThroug Secretary Scheol Educa § .Raipur (C t I 93.7 Bilaspur!‘ Chief Executive (CG). H [ -l+’,rch1er7Exelcutiv-e Janjgir3’(C.G). ' ofriéé‘ ‘ ,'zi1¥1a,P_an’ ’ ,, 9 a z _ r ficer, Zilla Panehay h K a, g gyrs, Bst B ‘ ridt ag, I, e ‘5 ) t é) § 7 ‘ or ‘ aii , . m aw}; ;..'. wEDmkwul £91290 [mamgafgaw ’ ' mmmméey I mwymgqg , 12 07 2005 ‘ _ ‘ Dr Shanesh Ahuja leamed wunsel for the petitioner. ammsmw ;V ‘ v Mr Pankaj Shnvastava leamed Panél Lawyer for the Sate Mr Parag Kotecha, leamed unsal for respondent No 3 Mr Satish Gupta learned co nsel for respondent No 4 earnedlcounsel for the pa' oner submrts that the petltroner r sha Karmr Gra e-l In Hrgher Secondary school inf Chhathsgarh I respondents 1 & 2 ‘ , at Bast: Bagra Pendra Road Dr5trct Brlaspur and her husband rs _ also workrng as teacher In Gover ment Mrddle School Sarkhon Jamgrr Which Is at a distance of 2 0 kms The petitioner has fled l two representations re Annexure -11 one Annexure P-12 (dated 24 05 2005) Leamed counsel for the petitioner submits that the petltloner wants to flle a fresh repr, entatlon before respondents 3 & 4 and the sald respondents may directed to consrder the same expeditiously i m the above crrcumstances espondents 3 & 4 are directed lthat the repres niatron‘tiled by the trtloner If any the same shall be considered sympathetloally In a :cordance wrth law and policy regulations wrthln a penod of one m nth from the date of receipt of ln View of the foregoing. the p‘ ition stans disposed of. d 'he representation :H S/2005 2O 000 ..;: "" ~w (Mr 7 r . r» .‘‘. i L k