FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WP/5117/2009 PADMAKAR V/S RAJKUMAR ... 1. Heard Shri M.L.Dharashive, learned Advocate for the petitioner. 2. By the impugned order dated 6.7.2009 passed by the learned District Judge, Aurangabad, application of the petitioner to send the document at Exhibit 25 to the Hand- Writing Expert for his opinion came to be rejected. 3. The application for sending the document to the Hand Writing Expert was made, for the first time, at the appellate stage after the suit was decreed. No written application was made to send the document to the Hand Writing Expert in the trial Court. 4. The lower Appellate Court in the impugned order has observed that the expert's opinion is a weak piece of evidence and has relied upon the decision in the case of Abdul Mutalik Rajjak Vs. Khubai Majidkhan Musalman [2005(4) Bom.C.R.399] and has rejected the application. 5. I see no reason to interfere with the discretion exercised by the learned District Judge, Aurangabad. 6. Writ Petition, therefore, is dismissed summarily. No order as to costs. Dt.21.12.2010 (A.A.SAYED, J.) akl