THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.2354 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioners filed an application under Section 5- A of the A.P. Record of Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act (for short ‘the Act’) before the 3rd respondent with a prayer to validate an unregistered sale transaction. The 3rd respondent passed an order, dated 24.01.2007 in favour of the petitioners. Respondents 4 to 6 filed an appeal under Section 5-B of the Act before the 2nd respondent herein. The appeal was allowed on 02.09.2008 holding that respondents 4 to 6 were also entitled for share in the land. The petitioners filed a revision before the 1st respondent against the order dated 02.09.2008 passed by the 2nd respondent. They also filed an application for stay on 29.01.2009. The grievance of the petitioners is that no orders have been passed either in the application for stay or in the revision and respondents 2 and 3 are taking steps to implement the orders dated 02.09.2008. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Revenue and Sri K.Mahipathi Rao, learned counsel for respondents 4 to 6. The petitioners got the relief of validation of transaction in their favour vide orders dated 24.01.2007 passed by the 3rd respondent. Respondents 4 to 6 did not feel aggrieved by the validation as such, but they pleaded that they are also entitled for a share in the land. Accordingly, they preferred an appeal. The appeal was allowed on 02.09.2008 and it was observed that they are entitled for a share. The petitioners plead that the 2nd respondent is not conferred with the power to adjudicate the shares of parties and accordingly filed the revision. This Court would certainly have directed stay of further proceedings in pursuance of the order, dated 02.09.2008. It is however represented by the learned counsel for respondents 4 to 6 that the order has been implemented, much before the petitioners filed the application. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that O.S.No.219 of 2008 was filed by respondents 4 to 6 for the relief of partition and separation possession of the property. In view of these developments, no relief can be granted to the petitioners. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. It is however directed that the 1st respondent shall dispose of the revision preferred by the petitioners within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. _________ 07.04.2009 JSU THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.2354 of 2009 Date: 07.04.2009 JSU