IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.10376/2007. Kailash Chand Gupta & Anr. Vs. Rent Tribunal & Ors. Date of Order:- 31 January 2008. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARI Shri S.R. Yadav for the petitioners. **** By this writ petition, petitioners challenge the order dated 11/9/2006 whereby pursuant to the application filed by respondent No.2 Order 1 Rule 10 CPC was allowed and the respondent No.3, M/s.Rajesh Kumar & Company and Firm Nitin Gupta & Co. through its partner Anuradha Gupta and also Anuradha Gupta and Nitin Gupta were ordered to be impleaded as party. Challenge to the aforesaid order has been made by the petitioners mainly on the ground that pursuant to the written-statement submitted by them and giving details about those applicants who have been impleaded as party respondents to be in occupation of the suit property, the non-petitioner moved an application and same was allowed erroneously. Though, plea of the 2 SBCWP NO.10376/07. petitioners in that regard was also given effect to that they have erroneously been made parties to the litigation. So far as challenge to the order dated 11/9/2006 for impleadment of party respondent of new persons is concerned, no serious challenge is made during the course of argument and otherwise when as per the statement made by the petitioners in their written-statement, new parties were added in the array of respondents, the petitioners cannot challenge the said order on any justified ground. Therefore, so far as challenge to the order dated 11/9/2006 in regard to impleadment of party-respondents of new persons is concerned, the writ petition is dismissed. (M.N. BHANDARI), J. anil