1 8 wp.501.10 ndm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 501 OF 2010 Raju Jysil Rao Pinto @ Subba Rao Pinto. ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent ----- Mrs. Anjali Waghmare for the Petitioner. Mr. K.V. Saste, APP for the State. ----- CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR and U.D. SALVI, JJ. DATE : 30 th August, 2010. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2 The learned APP on instructions submits that the computation given in paragraph No.2 of the order dated 11 st August, 2010 is correct. That aspect has been re-examined by the concerned authority. If it is so, the Petitioner in terms of order dated 08 th September, 2009 passed by the Home Department, would be released prematurely on completion of 26 years of imprisonment including all remissions subject to completion of actual imprisonment of 14 years. The argument of the Petitioner that the punishment of 26 years, specified by the State is 2 8 wp.501.10 excessive. We do not find any force in this submission in the fact situation of the present case. The petition therefore, is devoid of merits. The same is disposed of accordingly. 3 Court expresses word of gratitude for the able assistance given by the advocate appointed to espouse the cause of the Petitioner. 4 Copy of this order be forwarded to the Petitioner who is in jail, forthwith. [ U.D. SALVI, J ] [ A.M. KHANWILKAR, J ]