The Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.17405 of 2009 Dated 7th July, 2010 Between: Unique Service Consultants …Petitioner And Sri Padmavathi Mahila Viswavidyalayam and another …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mrs.Vasanta Lakshmi.B Counsel for respondent No.1: Smt.Anita Chander Counsel for respondent No.2: None appeared The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.1, in awarding contract pertaining to outsourcing and supply of non-teaching categories of skilled/semi-skilled and unskilled personnel on contract basis in favour of respondent No.2, as illegal. The petitioner sought for a consequential direction to set aside the said award of contract. At the hearing, Smt.B.Vasanta Lakshmi, learned Counsel for the petitioner, fairly conceded that as the initial period of one year contract period awarded to respondent No.2 is coming to an end in a short while from now, it may not be necessary for adjudication of the disputes raised in the Writ Petition on merits. The learned Counsel, however, submitted that the petitioner’s EMD is not refunded to it so far. Smt.Anitha Chander, learned Standing Counsel representing respondent No.1, stated that her client has no objection for refund of the EMD to the petitioner. In view of this statement of the learned Standing Counsel, respondent No.1 is directed to refund the petitioner’s EMD within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Subject to the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.22833 of 2009, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 7th July, 2010 lur