IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23860 of 2010 VISHWANATH MISHRA S/O LATE TRILOKI NATH MISHRA, R/O VILLAGE CHHITNWAN, P.S. MANER, DISTRICT- PATNA --PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --OPP.PARTY With Cr.Misc. No.32198 of 2010 SANDEEP KUMAR MISHRA @ BABLU S/O VISHWA NATH MISHRA, R/O VILLAGE-CHHITNAWAN, P.S. MANER, DISTRICT-PATNA. -PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --OPP.PARTY For the Petitioners : M/s Ramesh Pd. Singh & Sanjay Kumar For Informant : M/s Shrinandan Pd. Sinha & Ashok Kumar For the State : Mr. Uma Shankar Pd. Singh, APP. 2 09.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and Sri Srinandan Pd. Sinha, learned counsel for the informant. Since both the petitions arise out of one case, they are heard together and being disposed of by this order. Both the petitioners are named accused in this 2 case and petitioner of instant case, i.e., Cr.Misc. no. 23860 of 2010 carries specific allegation of inflicting injury on head of the mother of the informant by lathi but as appears from the order of the learned Sessions Judge, there is no such injury report. So far petitioner of Cr.Misc. no. 32198 of 2010 is concerned, he also carries specific allegation inflicting head injury on the informant by iron rod and this allegations stands substantiated by injury report showing three grievous wounds on the scalp. Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioner Vishwanath Mishra, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, in Maner P.S. no. 70 of 2010 subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, with additional condition that the petitioner shall remain present before the court below on each and every date for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier. If the petitioner fails to remain 3 present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Finding no merit, Cr.Misc. no. 32198 of 2010 is dismissed. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad