IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA C.W.P. No.2435 of 2010 Date of decision: 26.11.2010 ------------------------------------------------- Ram Swaroop Chauhan Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others. Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, J. Whether approved for reporting1? No. For the petitioner: Mr.Subhash Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. J.S.Guleria, Assistant Advocate General. V.K.Ahuja, J(oral). The petitioner has filed this writ petition claiming the following reliefs: (i) That a writ petition in the nature of mandamus may be issued directing respondents to provide adequate security to the petitioner and his family members from the unwarranted threats to their lives. (ii) That further a writ in the nature of mandamus may be issued directing respondents to register case No.63/09/2009 dated 21.9.2009, under section 34,379,427, 447 and 506 IPC. (iii) FIR No.9 dated 9.1.2010 under Sections 447, 379 may also be registered. Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes 2. In regard to the first relief, the petitioner is at liberty to make appropriate application under Sections 107,150,151 Cr.P.C. for taking action as and when he has any grievance against any particular person and the complaint can be pursued in the Court of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate accordingly, therefore, a report can be lodged with the police. 3. In regard to the second claim, the challan has already been filed and presented to the Panchayat. In case the petitioner has a grievance that some of the Panchayat members are accused, he is at liberty to apply for transfer of his case from Panchayat to the Court of Judicial Magistrate by filing appropriate application in the Court of Judicial Magistrate for seeking redressal of his grievances. 3. In regard to the third allegation, it has already been mentioned that FIR No.9 dated 9.1.2010has already been registered by the police. In case he has any grievance in this regard, he is at liberty to file application in accordance with law. 4. From the above discussion, I accordingly hold that nothing survives in the writ petition which is accordingly dismissed. November 26, 2010 ( V.K. Ahuja ), (SDS) Judge