IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 11TH AUGUST 2009 / 20TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 22869 of 2009(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ N.A.BHASKARAN NAIR, NADUVILEPARAMBIL HOUSE, POOVANTHURUTH P.O., KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.PHILIP T.VARGHESE SRI.THOMAS T.VARGHESE RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OP. SOCIETIES(GENERAL), KOTTAYAM. 2. KOLLAD SERVICE CO-OP. BANK LTD. NO.1836, KOLLAD P.O., KOTTAYAM. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 22869 OF 2009 (C) ===================== Dated this the 11th day of August, 2009 J U D G M E N T The complaint is primarily against the 1st respondent in not passing orders pursuant to Ext.P5. 2. Facts of the case is that, in 2003, pursuant to Ext.P1 application made by the petitioner, he had availed of a loan of Rs.2 lakhs from the 2nd respondent Bank. According to the petitioner, in terms of the Agricultural Debt Waiver and Debt Relief Scheme, 2008, he is entitled to complete waiver, but however, he was only given a partial waiver of the liability. Thereupon he made a complaint to the 1st respondent and the 1st respondent issued Ext.P5 notice calling the parties for a hearing. It is stated that on 13/7/2009, the petitioner was heard. But however, orders have not been passed. It is in these circumstances, the writ petition is filed. 3. Thus the basic complaint of the petitioner is regarding the delay on the part of the 1st respondent in passing orders on the complaint made by him. 4. If as stated by the petitioner, parties were heard by the WPC 22869/09 :2 : 1st respondent on 13/7/2009, there was no reason why orders shall not be expedited. 5. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing that on the production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition, the 1st respondent shall pass final orders on the complaint made by the petitioner, at any rate within four weeks thereafter. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp