1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4880 / 2010 (Seth Bankatlal Maloo vs. Shri Randive and another ) .................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... CORAM : D.D.SINHA & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ DATED : 1st February, 2011. Heard Mr. P.N. Mehta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A.S. Chandurkar, learned counsel for respondents. This Writ Petition is directed against the impugned communication dated 31st September, 2010 issued by the Superintending Engineer, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited, Nagpur ( in short “MSEDCL”). Mr.Chandurkar, learned counsel for the respondent-Company has submitted that the impugned communication has been withdrawn by the MSEDCL and, therefore, cause of action in the present Writ Petition no more survives. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the Respondent-Company has now issued a show-cause notice in respect of the similar issues connected with the cause of action involved in the present petition. 2 Be that as it may; since the impugned communication has been withdrawn by the MSEDCL, we dispose of the petition as infructuous. Mr. Chandurkar, learned counsel for respondents has submitted that appropriate action would be taken only after following the principles of natural justice and after taking necessary decision in this regard. JUDGE JUDGE sahare