1 CRA 299-2010 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.299 OF 2010 Subhash Bhikaji Mhapankar .Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & ors .Respondents Ms Yogini Ghawale, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs.A.A.Mane, APP, for Respondent No.1 - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 9TH FEBRUARY, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. This Revision questions the Order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dindoshi, Mumbai in C.C.No. 2600037/SS/2008. The grievance of the applicant is that applicant was shown as debarred in the list of Voters displayed on notice board when he was not so debarred. The learned Counsel for the applicant states that 2 CRA 299-2010 the applicant was in fact debarred by the DDR for three years but an Appeal was preferred against that Order. The pendency of the Appeal or whatever orders that may be subsequently would not alter the fact that the applicant was debarred. What is displayed by the Society on its notice board is a statement of fact and therefore, cannot amount to defamation. There is nothing wrong in the Order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge quashing process. 3. Criminal Revision Application is dismissed. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)