<- IN THE mOH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR .V W.rit Petition no'y./..;....of2001t ^ ^^——•••••••••-— 1 -\^y\ t^'^f)'"" Dr- shahid Ali> s/o Shri Hidayat Ali, ^•\^v' ^ Aged about 3 8 years, R/o D-4, .//K.^ / ^p\o-) /--:^fr / G.G.D.U. Campus, Koni, Bilaspur <^c <<°,^ ^" Respondents : ,y (C.G.) Versus 1) StateofChhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary, Higher Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Building, Raipur (C.G.) 2) Commissioner, Higher Education, Mantralaya, Government ofC.G. Science college premises, Raipur(C.G.) 3) Gum Ghasidas University, Through Registrar, Guru Ghasidas University, Koni, Bilaspur (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 2l7 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ 1. Particulars of the Petitiflni XI-HC-22 sn^r^iT feN>3TI^T sb>< uRa t'- -1- liSSi'SS 3^ 'if'.Wviii, w!\W\6, [^viWy. ^y^^ ,'••> M.-.fi.'..'?.^^ sii^i gwiwgfsff <*iiF<'i41.) ^itic<')'ffte^|'<fSiwi< ^sri^irsn^T 28.3.2005 Shri Suinit Venna, : Shri Saadeep Dube}) State/respondents No. 1 & 2.| Shn Ashish Shrivastavs couiliselfor I.A. No. 6463 sOIowed. appes|riag was aa iateryiew for the po Distence Bducation in Guru A copy ofcaU tetter has bee^i submits fhat on ttus day, ia^ of fhe iatemcw was not declfared has not been declared tiU todtar. -•- fhe petitioner. , Govemmeat Advocate for the , couasel for respondcnt No.3. /2004 for uigent heam^ is Heard on the qucstion ^fadiuissioii. Leamed cozinsel, pursuance of advertfscnicnt, petitioner was caBed to appe^r ain. He ftuther submlts thalt fhe intemew was conducted. This for tfae petilloner submits fhat in Annesxure P- 2 dated 22.2.2002, flie in inteiview on 28.10.2002 at 11.00 .t of Co-ordmator in tfae lastitute of Ghasidas Uiuveraity, Bflaspur (C.G.), fited as Aaaexure P- 3. Hc furttier :rvww was concluded, but the result red. He also submlts fhat the result -t,V!^j ^^^;, .,jTS;::".v ..^-^..^.^•Wa^-" XI-HC-22 sn^r^r S^wsn^r M tiRd ^S^^^^i' sunita 3^'3Trai?pr, »Tflt)ti<s, ieifiiyy ^rqg^ *<|tlWI 9)*nqT Hq; 200 sn^TSTmwHf^a' '2^-— 41<iid<nH ^ltld'f^'fe^ (RlWK ^sri^irsn^r Leamcd counsel for Vdfc petifkiDer submits 1hat fhe petitioner has filed various representa^ions, but the Uiuversily authorities are not giving any repty to the s^me. Hc naAes a Maaited praycr that a direction inay be given to f^e Uiuversily authorities to declare fhe result of fhe petitioner. In fhe opuuon ofttus Court, fhe praycr seecas to bc genuine. The same is aUowed. It is dtrccted that iffhe tesult ofthe iatemew dated 28.10.2002 has not bfcen dcclared so far, fhen fhe same shaB be declared by fhe Univcrs^y and It shaU be coinmunicated to the petitioner. If fhe result hai^ aheady beea dcclared, then tlie same should atso be commimica^ed to fhe petitioaier so fhat the matter may conic to aa end. Witfa the a&resaid 4»ections, thc petitioner stands GaaSiy disposed of. Certified copy as per [rules. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge (<ti^^)^) i. 'S lliiis!! IKI Ifiil iisisa '!• i il':M 'ffllf -^y ^Sft^ ^/A :w^ JUllLiLu