IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30741 of 2008 BACHU MAHTO @ BACHCHU MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 12.9.2008 Heard. Similarly situated accused person Pradip Mahto, whose prayer for bail was once rejected by this Court, was admitted to bail by this Court by the order passed in Miscellaneous petition no.21677 of 2005. This fact is recorded in the rejection order but the learned Judge was making a reference to the judicial discipline in granting bail and notes that this Court had rejected the prayer for bail of this petitioner, not permitting him to grant bail to the petitioner. If that could be the only part of the judicial discipline, this Court has nothing to say on that. But in the opinion of this Court judicial discipline also requires that the case has to be disposed of with quite expedition and sense of urgency also. That part of the judicial discipline has been missed by the learned Judge. Let petitioner named above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura, in connection with Ariari P.S. case no.5 of 2001. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )