- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 242 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO. 545 OF 1997 TIRATH RAJARAM TIWARI .... PLAINTIFFS Vs. M/s Ralhan Developers & Ors. .... DEFENDANTS Ms. Sapna Samant i/b Mr. H.S. Shreepad Murthy, Advocate for the plaintiffs. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 7th June, 2006 P.C. . The learned Advocate appearing in support states that in so far as the reliefs claimed in this chamber summons are concerned, in the light of the directions issued by this Court on the Court Receiver’s report on 10th Feb.’2006, it would not be necessary to press this chamber summons. The Chamber Summons is therefore - 2 - disposed of as not pressed and in the light of the order dtd. 10th Feb.’2006. Needless to state that disposal of this chamber summons would not prevent the plaintiffs from taking appropriate steps and also for the Court Receiver to comply with the order and directions issued on 10th Feb.’2006. All such remedies of the plaintiffs are kept open. Chamber summons disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. ( S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)