IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.6808 of 2010 (O&M) Decided on : 23.12.2010 Vikas Malik & another ... Petitioners versus Hukam Chand Malik ... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH Present: Mr. Aman Arora, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Pravindra Singh, Advocate for the respondent. **** Augustine George Masih, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the respondent informs the Court that the petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 preferred by the respondent – Hukam Chand Malik has been allowed by the Rent Controller vide order dated 25.11.2010 and therefore, states that the present revision petition has been rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to dispute this fact. Accordingly, this revision petition is dismissing as having been rendered infructuous. December 23, 2010 (Augustine George Masih) sonia Judge