THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S. RAO WRIT PETITION No.6012 of 2006 DATED:29-03-2006 Between: Vempati Padma and others .. Petitioners And The District Collector, Nalgonda District, Nalgonda. and others. ..Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.6012 of 2006 ORDER: The petitioners allege that their father was assigned land in 1983. The land is comprised in survey No.125/42/1 of Kondapuram Village of Chilukuru Mandal, Nalgonda District. It is their case that their father gave an extent of Acs.0.33 guntas of land to the first petitioner and an extent of Ac.1.00 of land to the second petitioner at the time of their marriage as pasupukunkuma, and the petitioners were also granted pattas by the third respondent. It is alleged that on a complaint given by the leaders of Communist Party of India (Marxists), the third respondent issued proceedings on 27.07.2005 cancelling the patta certificate of the petitioners on the ground that the petitioners are not landless poor persons. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners preferred an appeal before the Revenue Divisional Officer, the second respondent herein, who by proceedings, dated 24.11.2005, confirmed the orders passed by the Mandal Revenue Officer. Yet again, the petitioners filed a revision petition before the District Collector/Joint Collector and the revision is still pending. In the meanwhile, apprehending that they might be dispossessed, they filed the present writ petition assailing the orders passed by the Mandal Revenue Officer, as confirmed by the Revenue Divisional Officer. When the matter was initially listed on 27.03.2006, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (General) was directed to get instructions in the matter. Today after getting instructions in the matter, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submits that the Joint Collector has posted the matter to 10.04.2006, and the Mandal Revenue Officer and the Revenue Divisional Officer were directed to submit the records. Except stating that there is an apprehension of dispossession and that on such apprehension they filed the present writ petition, no material is placed in justification of such apprehension. Even according to the petitioners, though the Mandal Revenue Officer passed orders on 27.07.2005, they still continued to be in possession and this Court does not find any substance in the contention that there is a threat of dispossession. It is well settled that when statutory remedies are availed, the aggrieved person cannot invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India again. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, especially when the matter was posted by the Joint Collector to 10.04.2006. On that day, the Joint Collector may dispose of the revision petition filed by the petitioners. The writ petition, with the above observation, is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ___________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 29-03-2006 GJ