CRM-M No. 11183 of 2011 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CRM-M No. 11183 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.04.2011 Amar Nath ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Sandeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana for the State. ... Alok Singh, J (Oral). This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.47 dated 3.4.2011 under Sections 406/408/409/420/468/471/34 IPC, P.S. Bilaspur, District Yamunanagar On 15.4.2011, this Court has passed the following order:- Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner is ex- Sarpanch of village Shergarh. The allegation in the FIR is that he has embezzled a sum of Rs.99903/- during the period 2005- CRM-M No. 11183 of 2011 2 2010. No recovery has to be effected from the petitioner as all the related record is with the newly elected gram panchayat. Petitioner is 85 years of age. Notice of motion. Learned Assistant Advocate General, Haryana on the instructions of ASI Dharampal has stated that entire record has already been taken from the petitioner, therefore, custodial interrogation is not required. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, present petition is allowed. Petitioner shall join investigation within ten days from today. On joining, petitioner shall be released on bail by the Investigating Officer on furnishing his personal bond and one surety of Rs.20,000/- to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer, subject to the following conditions provided under Section 438(2) of the Code: (i) that petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer and when required; (ii) that petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly,- make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer, (iii) That petitioner shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court. Petitioner – accused shall keep on participating in the investigation as and when he is required to do so. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 27.04.2011 sk.