IGH x' 'i^/jLjLAAr -HC S. S- S.v'^fi ^ ^ J.Q, Shri Pyare Lal Sen Village- Block.- . ('C.G.) IStt. Ui 'iJi it!ai'i rn'i Educational <S Department, D.K Distt.-Raiour fC. Tri1 J. Mstrict Education Officer Dhamtari. Dismct-Dhamtari Raipur, District-Raipur (CG.) 'rsseat: Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. 3hri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State / respondentNo. 1 to'3. (Passed on 4m ofApril, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondente jointly siibmit • that the fact and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of ia Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. ^ M •CG 16}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Learned counsel appearing for the resnondents does not controvert the said submission. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in tsrms ofthe order passed in the case ofYashwant Kumar s. ". ou.uiai. subiect to verification of the fact as to whether the Detitioner has acauired B.Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and fiirther whether he bas been paid two advance mcrements or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit