1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (A) NO. 145 OF 2009 in APPEAL AGAINST ORDER (St) No. 14708/2009 (Shrikant Gulabrao Kaner and another ..vs.. Ramesh Gopalrao Hore and another) =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Ms. Seema Bhagat, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. V.Y. Wasu, Advocate for the Respondent No.1 C ORAM : Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota,J. DATED : 18th January, 2010. This is an application for condonation of delay of 6 days in filing the Appeal against Order challenging the order dated 16th March, 2009. The appeal is filed on 14th September, 2009. Perusal of the application shows that the same is not happily worded. It is clumsy to say the least the facts that prevented the applicant from filing the appeal within the prescribed period of limitation do not come out very clearly therein. At para 4 of the application, it is stated that the appellants were taking the necessary steps to prefer the appeal and there was consultation amongst themselves for the purpose. Thereafter they contacted their counsel and gave necessary instructions to him. Considering the short delay in filing the appeal, I am inclined to condone the delay of 6 days in 2 filing the Appeal against Order so as to grant an opportunity to the appellants to have their case considered on merits, by compensating the respondents with costs. The Civil Application is allowed on the applicants’ paying the costs quantified at Rs.1000/- (Rupees One thousand only) to the respondents in one set within a period of two weeks from today. Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE. Diwale