IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23441 of 2010 DINBANDHU PRASAD & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 16.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Admittedly, petitioners are in-laws of the deceased. Allegedly, the deceased died in mysterious circumstances within the four-walls of the house of these petitioners and subsequently, the case u/S 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code was registered against the petitioners as well as husband of the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioners points out that the husband of the deceased has already been granted regular bail by another bench of this court vide order dated 29.6.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 21365 of 2010 observing this fact that the intention of the husband of the deceased was not to commit murder of the deceased. Since there is no specific overt act has been attributed against these petitioners and from perusal of the impugned order as well as case diary, it appears that when deceased died only her husband was present in the aforesaid room. Considering the aforesaid facts and 2 circumstances, this anticipatory bail petition is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within 30 days from receipt of the order, the petitioners, Dinbabdhu Prasad, Gautam Kumar, Urmila Devi, Niki Kumari @ Anjali Kumari and Poonam Devi shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Ramgarhwa P.S. Case No. 13 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul at Motihari subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)