'x s- C^(^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.^. (S) No. ^5~^-i3l /2006 PETITIONER -y1/^/ .'o'^r^ .o^y -^•s y -**' ^'~ ^v* <»-^y <».<>• .?' »-'-y Futbal Dadsena /' S/o. Dhani Ram Dadsena Aged about 45 years Post- Assistant Teacher R/o. Bamhanidih, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDE^NTS .oox^ ^A.C^ \^'.w^ :1. State of Chhattisgarh// Through : Secretary Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer^ Janjgir, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer/. Block-Bamhanidih District-Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226/277 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRJT^ IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOROTHER SUITABLE-WRITS AND DIRECTIONS \- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SINGLEBENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATiSHK. AGNIHOTR!, J, Petjtjon&r Respondents WRITPETiTION fS.1 N0.5431 OF 2006 Futbal Dadsena versus State of Chhattisgarh and others ^- Present : Mr. Ramakant Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Government Advocate and Mr. Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State. ORDER (Passed on 6th ofOctober, 2006) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is working as Assistant Teacher in the Government Primary Schoo! Karnaud, Block Bamhanidih, Districi Janjgir-Champa. In the course of his service, the petitioner passed B.Ed. Examination on 27-3-1996 at his own expenses. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies on the decision of this Court in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj vs. Municipal Corpoiation, Durg andanother, wherein it has been held thatthe Teachers, having obtained B.Ed., M.Ed., B.T.I. Certificates, attheirown expenses, wouid be entifled to two advance increments. Aceording to fearned counsei for the petitioner, the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the decision in the matter of Yaslwant Kumar Bhaiadwaj (Sypra). Learned >K~ counsel appearing for the respondents/State fairly concedes to the position and agrees with the statements made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. Accordingiy, this petition is allowed in terms of fhe decision of this Court in the matter of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B.Ed. Certificate at his own expenses and further whether hs has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Certified copyas per ruies. i SatishK. Agnihotri Judge 2008 (!1) MPJR-CG S6 Gopal