1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.507 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.507 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.507 OF 2008 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1702 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 1702 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 1702 OF 2007 Indus Exim Pvt. Ltd., & Anr. .. Petitioners. vs. City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. .. Respondents. Mr. P.A. Sawant i/by Divya Shah & Asso. for Petitioners. Mr. G.S. Hegde i/by Hegde & Asso. for respondent no.2. CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE: 2ND FEBRUARY, 2009. DATE: 2ND FEBRUARY, 2009. DATE: 2ND FEBRUARY, 2009. P.C. . The issue in the petition relates to the area allotted to the petitioners by the respondent. It is the case of the petitioners that they have been given possession of 10,307 sq. ft. carpet area instead of 20,214.38 sq. ft. as specified in the lease. The stand taken by the respondent is that the area specified is the gross area and not the carpet area 2 whereas the petitioners are claiming that they are entitled for carpet area. This deserves to be heard on merits. Therefore, the relief sought for by the petitioners cannot be granted at interim stage. 2. In so far as the claim of the petitioner for compensation/area is concerned, in case the petitioners succeed and are found eligible to claim compensation/area, they can press the said relief at the time of the decision of the petition on merits. Notice of Motion stands dismissed with no order as to costs. 3. Liberty to the petitioners to move the Court for expediting hearing of the petition after Summer Vacation, 2009. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (Smt. V.K. Tahilramani, J.) (Smt. V.K. Tahilramani, J.) (Smt. V.K. Tahilramani, J.)