IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8880 OF 1991 DATE OF DECISION: SEPTEMBER 13, 2011 Dr.Raj Kumar Singhal .....Petitioner VERSUS The State of Haryana and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: None for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Nehra, Sr.DAG, Haryana, for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer not to terminate his services till the regular appointment was made on the recommendation of the Haryana Public Service Commission. The writ petition was ordered to be admitted on 11.6.1991. No order staying the termination was passed. Mr.Nehra points out that the petitioner was relieved on 6.6.1991. As per the reply, similar writ petitions have earlier been dismissed. In view of passage of time and having regard to the nature of relief claimed, the writ petition is rendered infructuous. At this stage, the petitioner can neither be put back into service nor can be offered appointment in service afresh. The writ petition is accordingly rendered infructuous and is dismissed as such. September 13, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE