1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 303 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 303 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 303 OF 2005 Shri Appa Laxman Kale .. Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharasthra ..Respondent. ----- Shri Rahul S. Thakur for the Applicant. Shri K. V. Saste, APP for Respondent - State. ----- CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : JANUARY 31, 2005 DATED : JANUARY 31, 2005 DATED : JANUARY 31, 2005 PC :- PC :- PC :- . Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the record. 2. I see no reason to depart from the conclusion reached by the court below in rejecting the bail application of the Applicant. There is evidence on record in the shape of statement of one Bhamne, to show complicity of the applicant in the commission of offence. Witness Bhambe spels out the mode in which the goods were stored at the out-house at the instance of the present Applicant. Indeed, no identification parade has been held but the evidence already on record, directly implicating the applicant in the 2 offence, cannot be ignored. Hence, not a case for bail. Rejected. 3. The trial court shall however, expedite the hearing of the case to be preferably concluded within nine months from the receipt of the writ of this court. . Ordered accordingly. .....