IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.94 OF 2010 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. OF 2010 IN SUIT (L) NO.3596 OF 2009 Bharat L. Harwani ... Appellant versus Khar Gymkhana and others. ... Respondents Mr. S.R. Ganbale i/by Mr. Sangramsing Yadav for the appellant. Mr. Milind Sathe, Senior Counsel with Mr. Swanand Ganoo and Ms. Devince Nigade i/by M/s. Divya Shah Associates for the respondents. CORAM : ANIL R. DAVE, CHIEF JUSTICE & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 24TH FEBRUARY, 2010 P.C. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant has submitted that, by efflux of time, period of suspension has come to an end and, therefore, he would not like to press this appeal. Appeal is disposed of as not pressed. 2. It is, however, clarified that it would be open to the appellant to take further appropriate action or any other remedy available to him in law. We also clarify that observation, if any, made by the learned Single Judge would not come in the way of the appellant in other proceedings, if any, filed by him. CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.