IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD JUNE 2009 / 13TH JYAISHTA 1931 Bail Appl..No. 2715 of 2009() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.83/09 OF PERINGOME POLICE STATION PETITIONERS/ACCUSED --------------------------------------- 1. SIDDIQUE.M., S/O. ABDULLA, AGED 34 YEARS, MONANGADU HOUSE, PERINGOME AMSOM, PEDENNA.P.O., NJEKKLI. 2. NABEEL KOMMACHI, S/O. AZEEZ, AGED 24 YEARS, KOMMACHY HOUSE, PERINGOME AMSOM, PDENNA.P.O., NJEKKLI. 3. ANZAR.A., S/O. AYOOB, AGED 24 YEARS, AACHAN HOUSE, PEDENNA.P.O.,PERINGOME AMSOM, NJEKKLI. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.HABEEB RESPONDENT(S): --------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PERINGOME POLICE STATION, THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SHRI.K.S.SIVAKUMAR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. ----------------------------------------- B.A.No. 2715 of 2009 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd June, 2009 O R D E R This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioners are accused 1, 2 and 4 in Crime No.83/09 of Peringome Police Station. 2. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 326 and 308 read with 149 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. I have gone through the case diary. In the nature of the allegations made against the accused persons and injury sustained by the two persons (de facto complainant and another), I do not think, this is a fit case where anticipatory bail can be granted under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The bail application is accordingly dismissed. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE vgs.