IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.6199 of 2007 Between: M/s.SBEC Project Private Limited (Formerly M/s.Sree Balaji Engineers & Contractors) having its registered office at H.No.39-3-3, Anjaneyapantulu Street, Labbipet, Vijayawada, Rep. by its Managing Director, Sri Y.Nagabhushana Rao ..... Petitioner AND 1.Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Transport, Roads and Buildings Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and 3 others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri.Ch.Satish Kumar for Sri M.Sudheer Kumar Counsel for the Respondents: AGP for R & B The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in not passing the final bill in respect of the L.S.Agreement No.7/2004-2005, dated 29- 06-2004 and in not paying the admitted amounts to the petitioner in spite of long lapse of time as illegal, arbitrary and violative or Art.14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially to direct the respondents to pass final bill I respect of the L.S.Agreement No.7/2004-2005, dated 29-06-2004 and to pay the amounts due to the petitioner if any within the specified time to be fixed by this Hon’ble Court ” Sri Ch.Satish Kumar, learned Counsel, representing Sri M.Sudheer Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, stated that subsequent to the filing of this Writ Petition, the petitioner has filed a civil suit for the same relief, which is claimed herein. He, therefore, sought for permission of the Court for withdrawal of the Writ Petition with liberty to his client to pursue the pending civil suit. The request of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is accepted and the Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.7929 of 2007, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 16th June, 2011 lur