H!GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAIVI: HON'BLE SHRI JAGDISH BHALLA, Ag.CJ. & HON'BLE SHRt DILIP RAOSAHEB DESHMUKH, J. M.A.fONo. 624 of 2007 APPELLANT : Shivkumar, aged about 30 years, Son APPLICANT of Ananddas, Resident of Village Birgahni, Police Station Jarhagaon, Tahsi! Mungeli, Districf Biiaspur (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS. 1. Pardeshi, aged about 38 yeare Son of NON-APPL3CANTS Sadhe Kosley, Driver, Resident of Blnobanagar, Mungeti, Police Station, Tahsii Mungeli, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. Prahlad Kumar Dewangan, aged about 55 years, Son of PriyQ Dewangan, Resident of New Bus Stand, Mungeli, Police Station, Tahsil Mungeti, District Biiaspur (C.G.) 3. United India Insurance Company Limited Korba, District Korba (C.G.). Appea! under Section 173 ofthe Motor Vehicle Acj 1988 Present: Shri K.S. Kurre, counse! for the appeltant. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 21st June, 2007) The foliowing oral order of the Court was passed by Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. The on!y point urged by iearnsd counse! for the appeilant in thls appeat for enhancement of compensation in an Injury case is that the learned Tribuna! has not properiy awarded compensation for the injuries suffered by the olaimahts. However, upon perusal of the impugned award, it is apparent that the claimant had not suffered any permanent disabiiity. No medical \ evidence was adduced and the ciaimant had claimed only Rs.23,000/- v towards pain atad suffering which amount was already awarded by the learned Tribunal along wit.h other amounts under the conventiona! heads.' Thus, we -s.- find that learned Tribunal has awarded just and reasonable compensation to the ctaimant. No interference is cailed for with the impugned award. Aooordingly, the appeal being devoid of merit it is dismissed at the stage of admission itself. Sd/- Ag. Chief Justice Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge Y^,