IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2689 of 2010 MOST. NAGEENA DEVI wife of late Kanhaiya Yadav, resident of vill.-Khamaini, P.S.-Rampur Chauram District-Arwal, presently C/o Chandradeo Yadav, at and P.O.-Ghato, P.S.-Goh, District-Aurangabad- ----------------------------------------------------------------------Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary, Home Department, Old Secretariate, Bihar, Patna, namely, Mr. Amir Subhani. 2. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, B.M.P., Muzaffarpur, Range, Muzaffarpur namely Mr. Virgu Niwashan 3. The Superintendent of Police, Munger, namely Mr. M. Sunil Nayar 4. The Commandant, Bihar, Millitary, Police-9 Jamalpur, Munger namely Mr. Abhitabh Kumar Das 5. The Treasury Officer, Munger namely Mr. Thakur Prasad Singh 6. The General Provident Fund Officer, Munger namely Mr. Neel Kamal 7. The Accountant General, Bihar, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna, namely Mr. I.D.S. Dhaliwal---------------Respondents/Opposite Parties-contemners. 8. Most. Meena Devi, wife of late Kanhaiya Yadav, residing Near B.M.P.-9 Quarters, Bari Ashikpur, P.O.and P.S.-Jamalpur, Distt.-Munger----------------- ------------------------------------------------Petitioner/respondent/opposite party. ----------- 6. 25.1.2011 The present M.J.C. application has been filed for non- implementation of the order dated 15.4.2010 passed in L.P.A. no.637 of 2010. In the order passed by the Division Bench in L.P.A. no.637 of 2010, the order of the learned Singh Judge was modified to the extent that appellant shall get 2/3rd of the retiral dues and the pensionary benefits and respondent no.8, first wife of the deceased employee, will get 1/3rd of the same. The State was directed to disburse the amount proportionately within four weeks but State had not complied the order passed by the Court and as such, present M.J.C. application has been filed. A show cause and a supplementary show cause have been filed by opposite party nos.3 and 4 wherein is stated that a draft of Rs.2,05,842/- bearing no.76445079 dated 23.8.2010 has been received by the appellant in presence of her nephew 2 Awdesh Kumar and also she has acknowledged the same by putting her LTI in presence of Awdesh Kumar and Ram Naresh Yadav S.I.(A) on 14.10.2010. It is also stated in para-4 of the supplementary show cause that opposite party no.8 has deposited Rs.83,363/- in the deponent’s office and deponent sent two letters bearing no.2188/Q dated 21.10.2010 and no.2325 dated 8.11.2010 to the appellant and appellant received the amount. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has not been paid revised pay scale which was due to the deceased employee. In view of the above submission, we are of the opinion that such issue cannot be decided by this Court but it would suffice if liberty is granted to the petitioner to make a representation before an appropriate authority with regard to his claim of revised pay scale which was due to the deceased employee. As and when such representation is made, the same should be disposed of by the authority in accordance with law. With the above observation this M.J.C. application is closed. Sudip ( T. Meena Kumari, J.) ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J. )