IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4386 of 2010 RAVINDRA KUMAR SINGH @ RAVINDRA SINGH SON OF GUPTESHWAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.2.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 121, 121A, 122, 124A, 120B, 414 of the Indian Penal Code, 25(1-b)a/26/35 of the Arms Act, 4/5 of the Explosive Substance Act, 17 of the C.L.A. Act and 18, 19, 20 of the Provision of Illegal Assembly Act, 1967. The prosecution case is that on a confidential tip-off the house of the petitioner was raided and from the premises, which was in effective occupation of tenant Subodh Singh, huge amount of detonator explosives and incriminating articles were recovered. On interrogation the petitioner stated about himself being the land- lord and the premises having been let out to co-accused Subodh Singh. In the first information report one line has been inserted to the effect that Subodh Singh and Santosh Singh used to stay with the petitioner whenever they used to come. This evidently is an addition. It has been submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents and he is not involved in any anti-social activities and is working as a security Guard. Taking into consideration the aforementioned facts, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 18.11.2009, - 2 - be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City in Agamkuan P.S.case No.249 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail, (iii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse of bail, (iv) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (v) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The fact that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case will be verified by the Magistrate concerned before releasing the petitioner on bail. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )