-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3114 OF 2006 Sunil Bharadkar ...Petitioner versus The Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai and another ... Respondents Mr. M.M. Vashi for the petitioner. Mrs. P.A. Purandare for respondent No.1. Ms. Kiran Bagalia for respondent No.2. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATE: OCTOBER 29, 2007. P.C. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner, he would be willing to take premises No. 1 or 2 instead of premises No.6. Counsel for the respondents state that if premises No.1 or 2 is vacant and available, the same would be allotted to the petitioner. In view of the statement made, nothing survives in this petition and the same is disposed of. The respondents will abide by their statement. -2- CHIEF JUSTICE DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.