L.P.A. No. 300 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH L.P.A. No. 300 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision 29.07.2010 M/s Diamond Engineering Works. -----Appellant Versus Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court and other ---Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present: Mr. P.K. Sachdev, Advocate for applicant-workman. Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for non-applicant-management. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. Learned counsel for the appellant after obtaining instructions from Mr. Sanjeev Narendra, the sole proprietor of the appellant-firm who is present in the Court states that in addition to Rs. One Lakh, which has already been deposited with the Labour Court, Gurgaon, another sum of Rs. 3,25,000/- shall be paid to the workman- respondent No.2 in lieu of his all dues and reinstatement in service, within a period of three months from today i.e. on or before 29.10.2010. Mr. P.K. Sachdev, learned counsel for the workman-respondent No.2 has accepted the aforesaid offer and states that the amount of L.P.A. No. 300 of 2009 -2- Rs. 3,25,000/- in addition to Rs. 1,00,000/- must be deposited within the period as fixed by this Court. In view of the above, the appeal does not survive for adjudication and is disposed of in terms of the statement made by the sole proprietor of the appellant-firm through his counsel. The appellant shall remain bound by the statement made before this Court. In case, the payment is not made within the stipulated time, the workman-respondent No.2 shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before this Bench. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (A.N. JINDAL) JUDGE July 29, 2010 Atul