IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 11967 of 2008. Decided on: 27 th December, 2010. Mamta Devi. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 no ________________________________________________________ __ For the petitioner. : Mr. J.R. Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr. L.N. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 4. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Petitioner has assailed the appointment of respondent No. 4 to the post of Shishu Palak. The suitability of the petitioner and respondent No. 4 has been gone into by a duly constituted selection committee. Petitioner has secured 8.6 marks, whereas respondent No. 4 has secured 8.7 marks. Since the suitability of the petitioner and respondent No. 4 has been adjudged by a duly constituted selection committee, this Court will not sit in appeal over the recommendations made by a duly constituted selection committee. Moreover, no malafides have been alleged against the members of the selection committee. 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No December 27, 2010. (bhupender)