i33i'S!siW S^i^^ H!GH COURTOF CHHATTtSGARH AT BiLASPUR Writ PetitiO.i (227) No. 4388 of 2010 Petitioner Respondent No.3 ResDorsdenis Ripusudan Shrivas, aged about-62 vears, S/o iate Barmanla! Shrivas, R/o-Near Kelo Bridge, Beiaduia, Raigarh, Tahsi! and District-Raigarh fr^ n- '\ \»f,\^i^ Versus 1. Ths Stais of Chhattisgam, Through-the Secretary, Depai'tment of Revenue, Mantraiaya, Dau Kaiyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Ths Commlssloner, BiSaspur Divissonai Officer of Commjssionsr, Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. The Coilector, District- Raigarh (C.G.) 4. The Nazui Officsr, Raigarh, Districi - Raigarh (C.G.) AppiicanyAppeiiant 5. Sikh Samaj, fsigarh, tnroush-lts Shri Guruslngh Sabha, Gurisdwara, Raigarh, Distrlct-Raigarh (C.G.) Respondsnt No.2 about-60 6. A.F»1.Rabra, Advocate, aged years, S/o Lat® M.M.Rabra, R/o- Gsurishankar Mandir Road. Raloarh. District-Raigarh (C-.G.) (Writ Pstltson under Artteie 227 of the Constifution of India) (SB: Hon'bie Mr. T.P. Sharma, J.} Present:- Mr.Roop Naik, counse! forthe pstltioner. Mr.R.K.Jhs, Dy.Govt.Advccate for respondsnts No.1 io 4/Stats. ORAL ORDER w August, 2010) 1. _ Hsard. *• 2. i havs perused the order dated 21.5.2010 passed by the Commisslones', Biiaspur Division in Cass No.241/A 20 (1),'2008-09, whereby an appeai has bsen fixed for finai hsaring. y .f ^ B/. -2-- 3. Leamed counsei for the pstitioner submsis thai previousiy rscords of f'A'o cases wsre rsquisitioned but wfthoiit rsceiving the same, fhe Commjssioner, sliaspur Dlvision has fixed the case for finai hearina. 4. i do not find any iiiegaiity in fixsng fhs case for nnal hearing &y ihs Commissionsr. Howsvsr, in case of any necessity, the petitioner may nis csrtified copy of the ordsr whteh hs wani to take support. 5. With thte obsen/ation, the petition is dismisssd. Ho order ss to costs. Sd/- T. P. Sharma Judge