IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI MONDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2010 / 21TH POUSHA 1931 WP(Crl.).No. 562 of 2009(S) ------------------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- FAJRUSADIK, S/O.YOOSEF, AGED 24 YEARS, RESIDING AT KELOTHTHAZHEKUNIYIL, P.O.PANOOR, THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.SURENDRANATH SRI.P.K.RAMKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RURAL KANNUR DISTRICT, P.O.KANNUR. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PANOOR POLICE STATION, P.O.PANOOR, THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT. 3. HAMSA, S/O.FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT VAISHARAVIDA HOUSE, PACHAPARAMBATH, PANOOR P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT. 4. SHAKKEELA, W/O.HAMSA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, DO. DO. 5. DETUNE SHABANATH HAMSA, D/O.HAMSA, RESIDING AT VAISHARAVIDA HOUSE, PACHAPARAMBATH, PANOOR P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI P.N. SUKUMARAN. R3 TO R5 BY ADVOCATE SHRI P.K. IBRAHIM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH & P.Q. BARKATH ALI, JJ. -------------------------------------------------- W.P(CRL). NO. 562 OF 2009 S --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th January, 2010 JUDGMENT K.M. Joseph, J. Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus commanding respondents 1 and 2 to search for the 5th respondent, find out her and produce her before this Court in order to set her at liberty. A direction is sought to respondents 3 and 4 also to produce the 5th respondent before this Court. 2. Today, the alleged detenu was produced. We interacted with her. We also interacted with the petitioner and also the father of the alleged detenu (third respondent). We also heard the learned counsel appearing. The alleged detenu, namely Ms. Shabanath Hamsa would submit before us that she is not under any illegal detention by the third and fourth respondents. In the W(CRL).NO.562/09 S 2 light of this, we do not see any merit in the Writ Petition and it is accordingly dismissed. Sd/= K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE Sd/= P.Q. BARKATH ALI, JUDGE kbk. // True Copy // PS to Judge