IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 22319 of 2004 Between: A.Mohan E.No.104713, S/o.Lingaiah Korutla Depot, APSRTC Korutla, Karimnagar Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The APSRTC rep byt s Regional Manager Karimnagar Dist. 2 The APSRTC rep byt s Depot Manager Korutla Depot, Korutla, Karimnagar Dist. 3 The Enquity Officer/Asst Manager APSRTC O/oThe Regional Manager, Karimnagar Dist. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR B.KIRAN KUMAR FOR MR.K.VASUDEVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to Issue a writ or order or direction, especially one in the nature of Mandamus: (a) Declaring the action of the respondents in seeking to conduct the departmental enquiry in terms of Charge Sheet No.E2/25(1)2004-KRTL, dated 10-8-2004 issued by the 2nd respondent while the Criminal Proceedings initiated vide Crime No.65 of 2004 pending on the file of P.S.Korutla Karimnagar Dist as illegal and arbitrary. (b) to defer the departmental proceedings initiated by the 2nd respondent vide charge sheet NoE2/25(1)/2004 -KRTL dt 10-8-2004 till the conclusion of Criminal Proceedings initiated vide Crime No.65/2004 pending on the file of the Police Station, Korutla, Karimnagar Dist and CC 361/04 on the file of the 1st Class Judicial Magistrate, Koratla.” At the hearing, Sri B.Kiran Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri K.Vasudeva Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 28th November, 2008 vrn