C^- \^S-Q IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUREAT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH w> .••''ef!y^^ '.c^'< '^^ ...••'',•i1'"^.^''' ^' ~ Vy'. ^" /-•' ^"'.^•'' ^' RESPONDENTS ^ ^o^ -d^ ^'/^^ ^' S'IP 0{ ^ WRIT PETITION [S] No./7^/ /2007 PETITIONER J3-inesh Kumar Sharma f S/o Ram Gopal Sharma, aged ^^iy ,-about 44 years, R/o Near Saraswati Temple, Ashok Nagar, Chantidih, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) VKRSUS /-1-: State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary Medical Education Department Bhartiya Chikitsa Padhati 8s Homeopathy, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) ^ Deputy Director Bhartiya Chikitsa Padhati & Homeopathy, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3^ District Auryved Officer Jangir-Champa District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) Raj Kumar Kaushik S/o not known aged about known posted as Medicine Convener (Ausadhi Sainyojak) Govemment Auryved Hospital Bodsara. &v O/ APARNA \<% M&U/sv.n } ii ti! St! .^) w 5^ Durga Prasad Induwa S/o not known aged not known posted as Medicine Convener (Ausadhi Sainyojak) Government Auryved Hospital Jawali, Korba District Korba (C.G.) 6. Shri Girdhan Lal Patale S/o not known aged not know Posted as Medicine convener (Ausadhi Sainyojak) Government Auiyved Hospital) Budhwari, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ ^} ^ HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ_Pedtion(Sl No. 737 of 2007 Petitioner Dinesh Kumar Shacma Versus Respondents State of Clihattisgarli & others (Writ Petition uaderArdcle 226 ofthe Coiistitution oflndia) (SB: Hoii'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Ms Sunita Jaini, Advocate for ftie petitioner. Shri P. K. Bhaduri, Paael Lawyer for the respondents No. 1 to 3. O RD B R (oiall ( Passed on this 7th day ofDecember, 2009) Heard. 1. Learaed counsel appearmg for the petitioner subiruts that th petitioner has filed aa application (I.A.No. 3) for withdrawal c the writ petition with liberty to inake a representation, 2. Leamed couusel appearing for the respondents/State has w objection. 3. In wiew of the above, fhe application (I.A.No.3) is ordered, as prayed fer. The writ petition is dismissed as wifhdrawn with the above-stated liberty, if so adwised. Consequeatly, the interim order dated 7.2.2007 staads discbai^ed. No order asto costs. Satish K. Agnihol Judge Thalcur