IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.12210 of 2000 Between: 1 P Seetharamaiah, S/o Late Laxminarsimham, O/o Superintending Engineer Operation Circle, (Electricity) Near St. Joseph Convent, Srikakulum 2 R Prasada Rao, S/o Sundara Rao, B/o RTC Complex, Srikakulum 3 D Sobha Devi, D/o Late Surya Rao Dora, O/o Superintending Engineer Operation Circle, (Electricity) Near St. Joseph Convent, Srikakulum ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Transmission Corporation of A.P. Ltd., Rep by its Director, Vidyuth Soudha, Hyderabad 2 East Power Transmission Company of A.P. Ltd., Rep by its Managing Director Visakhapatnam 3 The Superintending Engineer, Operation, Eastern Power Transmission Company of A.P. Ltd., Srikakulum ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction and to direct the respondents to consider and promote the petitioners to the Post of Upper Divisional Clerks in the existing Vacancies in Operation Circle, Srikakulum District and allow all consequential benefits and grant such other relief or reliefs as it deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. V.VENKATARAMANA Counsel for the Respondents: Mr. S.RAVINDRANATH The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: It seems, the case of the petitioners was initially considered for promotion to the post of Upper Division Clerk by the 2nd respondent by Proceedings dated 15-2-1999. However, the said order was revised on 18-2-1999 before the Order dated 15-2- 1999 was given effect to. In view of the above, nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition. However, this will not preclude the respondents from considering the case of the petitioners for promotion as and when vacancies arise, if they are not already promoted. Subject to the above observation, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. 25-8-2005 prk