Crl. Misc.No.M 30465 of 2010 # 1# IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAT AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc.No.M 30465 of 2010 Date of Decision:-26.11.2010 Darbara Singh @ Bara & Ors. ......Petitioners. Versus State of Punjab & Anr. ......Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH. Present:- Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, AAG Punjab. *** JASWANT SINGH, J.(ORAL) Prayer is under section 482 Cr.PC for quashing of FIR No.369 dated 07.11.2004 under Sections 307, 325, 341, 323 and 34 of Indian Penal Code registered with Police Station Jagraon, District Ludhiana and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 07.10.2010(P2). As per allegations in the FIR, complainant was having land near the brick kiln adjoining the boundary of village Deharka and same is also adjoining to the land of Bara Singh. Bara Singh ploughs 3 feet land of the complainant along with his land due to which they were having dispute. Complainant got constructed a cemented boundary wall on his land. When the sons of the complainant were cultivating their land and complainant Crl. Misc.No.M 30465 of 2010 # 2# was at some distance from them, then accused Bara Singh son of Arjun Singh along with other persons including the petitioners armed with deadly weapons such as Iron Rod & stick raised lalkaras and used abusive language and entered the field of the complainant and stopped the complainant as well as his sons from ploughing wheat and in order to teach the complainant and his sons a lesson for not listening to the accused persons, they attacked the complainant and his sons and inflicted injuries on their persons. Complainant raised alarm upon which they were saved by some persons of the village. While issuing notice of motion for today, the court vide order dated 13.10.2010 had given the liberty to the petitioners-accused to get their statements recorded in terms of compromise by making an application before the learned trial court. As per the report of registry, parties did not move any application for getting their statements recorded. Learned State Counsel on instructions from HC Surjit Singh states that the entire trial is over and case is fixed for pronouncement of judgment on 3.12.2010. In view of the aforesaid report of registry and the fact that the entire trial is over and case is fixed for pronouncement of judgment on 3.12.2010, the prayer of the petitioners cannot be entertained at this stage. Dismissed. ( JASWANT SINGH ) JUDGE 26th November, 2010 Vinay