IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11954 of 2008 1. RAJENDRA SINGH 2. Awadhesh Singh, Both sons of Late Mundrika Singh 3. Dilip Singh son of Late Ram Janam Singh 4. Jagnarain Singh 5. Kedar Singh 6. Ramchandra Singh, all three sons of Late Kailash Singh 7. Wibhishan Singh 8. Sundar Singh @ Ram Sundar Singh, both sons of Jaddu Singh All residents of village-Bishunpur, P.O. Nima Budhauli, Anchal + P.S. Amas, District- Gaya ………………………. Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Joint Director of Consolidation, Magadh Division, Gaya 3. The Consolidation Officer, Amas, Gaya 4. Sheo Kumar Singh son of Late Ram Sharan Singh @ Sharan Singh 5. Ragho Singh son of Late Shubha Singh Both residents of village-Bishunpur, P.S. Nima-Budaul, P.S. Amas, District-Gaya …………………………. Respondents. ----------- 2. 14.05.2009 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the state. This application has been filed by the petitioners for setting aside the order dated 05.05.2008 passed by Joint Director, Consolidation, Magadh Range, Gaya in Consolidation Revision Case No. 31/08. Prayer of the petitioners in the revision application was for correction of the area and Chak land and demarcation of area on the basis of measurement report of Ameen. Petitioners are claiming equal share in the land as it has been allotted to respondents No. 4 & 5. Considering the impugned order, I do not find that at - 2 - this stage, all such questions would have been raised if not raised by the petitioners earlier. The impugned order has been passed by the Joint Director, Consolidation, considering the case of the petitioners as well as the respondents. I do not find any error in the impugned order. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. However, if the petitioners have any grievance, their remedy lies before civil court of competent jurisdiction. He may approach the appropriate forum. akv (Mridula Mishra, J.)