IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28024 of 2010 SANTOSH KUMAR, SON OF NAGESHWAR BHAGAT Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 363 and 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that subsequent to the alleged kidnapping of the victim, a phone call had been made from one Ranjit Kumar that the victim was with him. The petitioner happens to be the friend of the elder brother of the said Ranjit and, therefore, he was suspected to be involved in the present occurrence. Considering the same, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahana at Motihari, in Madhuban P.S. Case No. 42 of 2010 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any 2 other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)