WPC No.9969/2009 Page 1 20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9969/2009 NARINDER KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Dhruv Kumra, Adv. versus MCD & ORS. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA O R D E R % 18.01.2010 The petitioner was granted ad-hoc meat trade registration license, which was renewed from time to time. 2. The petitioner’s application for grant of regular meat trade license is not being considered and replied to. This, compel the petitioner to approach this Court. 3. The respondent, MCD in their reply have admitted that the petitioner had applied for regular meat trade license but has not submitted rent agreement and ‘no object certificate’ from the land lord, which are essential requirements for grant of regular meat trade license. 4. Counsel for the petitioner, however, has drawn my attention to the agreement dated 16th September, 2002 entered into between the petitioner and his landlord. In clause 5 of the said agreement, the land lord has stated that WPC No.9969/2009 Page 2 he has no objection to running of a meat shop from the premises in question. The respondents in their counter affidavit have not alleged that the said agreement is forged and fabricated. The landlord has not written any letter or made any allegation to the said effect. Accordingly, directions are issued to the respondents to process the case/application of the petitioner on the basis of the agreement dated 16th September, 2002. In case no adverse material or evidence is found, which shows that the agreement is forged and fabricated, the same will be treated as legal and valid for the purpose of grant of regular meat trade license. The aforesaid exercise will be completed within six weeks from the date copy of this order is received. The writ petition is disposed of. Dasti. SANJIV KHANNA, J. JANUARY 18, 2010. NA