IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Rev. No. 280 of 2002 Date of Decision: April 23,2009 Rajinder Kumar and another ........................................Petitioners Versus Sultan, Tea Vendor ....................................................... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Ashutosh Mohunta Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Binderjit Singh, Advocate for the respondent. ... ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, J. (Oral) Counsel for the respondent states at the Bar that he has definite information that the petitioners as well as the respondent have compromised the matter and that the revision petition has been rendered infructuous. In view of the statement made by the counsel for the respondent, the revision petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. As the counsel for the petitioner is not present, therefore, in case the statement made by the counsel for the respondent is incorrect than the petitioner may file an application within a period of three months from today for revival of the revision petition. 23.4.2009 ( ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA ) Rupi JUDGE