i.30 % 13.07.2007 Present:; Mr. Rajat Aneja for the petitioner. +CM(M) No.915/2007 1. Impugned order dated 16.3.2007 has disposed of petitioner's (the husband) application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act declining any interim maintenance to him from his wife. 2. The parties were married on 18.7.1963. When divorce petition was filed, husband was aged 64 years and the wife was 63 years. They had completed their matrimonial obligationsqua each other. 4 daughters were born during the wedlock. 3 out of 4 daughters are happily settled and are gainfullyemployed. 1 out ofthe 3 gainfullyemployeddaughters is with the petitioner. AdaughterRadhikawho is handicappedis being maintained by the wife. \ 3. Petitioner and respondents are academicians of repute. Both of them have obtained their Masters in Economics from Delhi School of Economics. Petitioner is a journalistof internationalrepute. Respondenthas retiredas a professorfrom Lady Shri Ram College. page 1 of 2 Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified 4. 7. 8. 9. The learned Trial Judge has noted that both spouses are retired and apart from pension each makes money from lectures etc. 5. , It is urged by the petitioner that the wife is having a better income due to the fact that she is delivering more lectures. ; 6. Mathematical precision is not required while adjudicatingclaims under Section24 ofthe Hindu MarriageAct. Ifind no merits in the petition. Dismissed. Nd costs. July 13, 2007 dk PRADEEPNANDRAJOG,J. page 2 of 2