^"..^' fS^"' ... ?<esB* ^>-r'^^ ®^ ::::^-"- ^ ..-\; ^•" A^J/ +11l4l^ ^S^f ''^ETRn^PT U^friTTS,^!^^ QE?.7T.) W.P. (C) No35 /2011 (S.B.) ^TR, ftcTT T^ft, •vra cWTH' 30 ^T, f^TcTR'Tr- cTT^ •?r. 9 4)^41';! WW'5\ ?TH ^? ^ TTRT 6|IJ|s|^l TJte—6TFT6[^r, cl?. -cT I^TcTT tisi<;-l^c; (^.^.) 1. yi^Tl't^ld ?TW-T ^KT- fcl'h^ •^lfqqilCfaI A snf^T VTT^T T?cr sT^qi^r uTTf^r fclwT, iT^Tcrar, ^ry (^.Tr.) 2. 'a^l' sriSrcpr^ (^^i^Ti srtor^) Sfj'i^ld uTT^T/vl^ullfc'l ST^HETFT ~V^ g^rST°T ^ReTPT, '<R^ '< Rf?T. ??.7T. <dWt'<qi<{141"l ,- /'"~%-, :/ ^ • - S ^s?'^-.-'^^'^ 1 ''WSBSS^ .v^^~ 5? HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUE WRIT PETITION (C) N0.5505 OF201 1 PETITIONER Yogendra Kumar Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Another (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Mon'bleShri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri R.K. Patel, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Adv. General forthe State. ORDER (Passed on this 4 day of November, 2011) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By the instant petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent No.2 to verify the social sfatus certificate of the petitioner. 3. Grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent No.2 i.e. fhe High Power Caste Scrutiny Committee has orally declined to verify the social status certificate of the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner has filled to produce the land records prior to the year 1950, which is mandatory. 4. The caste certificates are issued on the basis of circulars, directions and guidelines issued by the Supreme Court in Kumari Maduri Patil and another v. Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development and Others , which has been followed by this Court in Narendra Dehariya \t. State af Chhatfisgarh & Others1. 5. The aforesaid issue came up into consideration before a Division Bench of this Court in Narendra Dehariya (supra) & other connected matters, wherein it was observed as under: "Thereafter the Government has issued another order dated 27.06.2007 wherein definition of bonafide residents of Chhattisgarh has been defined and explained 1 (1994)63cc 241 ^JA/P (C) No.5070/2007, decided on 27-9-2007 ¥£.:/as> 1 v ,y '•'«' 8. which includes (i) person belonging to the central services, posted at Chhattisgarh, their spouses or children; (ii) all the employees of the State of Chhattisgarh, their spouses or children; (iii) persons appointed on Constitutional or Statutory posts by President of India, their spouses or children; (iv) Corporations, Agendes, Commissions Board's, Officials/ OfFicers/ employees, their spouses or children. This Government order is to benefit the petitioners-students with respect to bonafide residents of Chhattisgarh. We are of the considered opinion that once such persons have been recognized as residents of Chhattisgarh, then the same analogy shall apply for purpose of the admission of children of the categories referred to hereinabove are concerned, if their caste is included in the Presidential Order." The said order has neither been amended nor modified nor set aside by the superior Court, the same remains as it is. Having regard to the above stated observations and directions passed by this Court in Narendra Dehariya (supra) the respondent No.2 is directed to consider thecase of the petitioner and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, without insisting on production of the land records prior to the year 1950, as land-records alone arenotthe requirement. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge