IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 8014 of 2003 Between: G.Bhaskar, S/o.G.Ramana, 13-708 B RTC Bus Stand Road, Anantapur. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, A.P.Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Director, Town & Country Planning, A.C.Guards, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 3 Anantapur Municipality, Rep. by its Commissioner, Anantapur. 4 The Lions Club, Rep. by its President Police Welfare shopping complex, Anantapur-515 001. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in allowing the 4th respondent to encroach upon 16 cents of land in Central Park, Anantapur bearing survey numbers 173-3, 173-4, 173-7, 174-1 and 175-5 and permitting to the make permanent constructions as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of A.P. Municipalities Act. 1965, the A.P. Municipalities (Acquisition and Transfer of Immovable properties) Rules, 1967 and A.P. Municipalities (layout) Rules, 1970 Unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 to clear the encroachments in Central Park, Anantapur and demolish the structures constructed by the 4th respondent and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.SRINIVASA RAO BODDULURI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN. & URBAN DEV. THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.8014 of 2003 ORDER: Today, when the matter came up ‘for hearing’, neither the counsel for petitioner is present nor is there any representation on his behalf. Hence the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. R.SUBHASH REDDY,J Date:07.07.2009 usd