IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-13472 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 06, 2011 Gian Chand Saini . ….Petitioner Versus State of Haryana. … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Suram Singh Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) This is second bail application seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 441, dated 01.12.2010, under Sections 406, 420, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station, Sadar Thanesar. First bail application was withdrawn by the petitioner on 28.04.2011 stating that petitioner shall surrender/appear before the Illaqa Magistrate on or before 10.05.2011. Crl. Misc. No. M-13472 of 2011 Record reveals that earlier anticipatory bail application was moved before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kurukshetra. On 15.01.2011, learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kurukshetra, has recorded the statement of the learned counsel for the accused that accused shall make every effort to return the consignment to the Department. Undisputedly, no consignment was returned after the assurance given to the learned Additional Sessions Judge. No good ground is made out for second bail application. Dismissed. May 06, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2