IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.1053 of 2009 Amlesh Kumar Yadav, S/o Mahendra Rai, resident of Village Madhukarpur, P.S. Kanhauli, District Sitamarhi. .... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar, through the D.G.P. Bihar, Patna. 2. The Inspector General of Police, Muzaffarpur Zone. 3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Muzaffarpur. 4. The Dy. S.P. Sitamarhi. 6. The Officer in charge of Kanhauli Police Station, District Sitamarhi. 7. Rasnarayan Rai, S/o Ramdeo Rai, resident of Village Madhukarpur, P.S. Kanhauli, District Sitamarhi. 8. Pratibha Kumari, W/o Amlesh Kumar Yadav, D/o Rasnarayan Rai at present residing at Village Madhukar, P.S. Kanhauli, District Sitamarhi. .... Respondents. ----------- 04- 28.1.2010 Heard Mr. Uday Kumar for the petitioner, learned Assistant Counsel to Mr. Gopal Krishna Agrawal, Government Pleader no.1 for respondent nos.1 to 6, and Mr. B.K. Sinha for respondent nos.7 and 8. The petitioner claims to have married respondent no.8, and seeks a direction to respondent no.7, to release her to join her husband in her matrimonial home. The petitioner, and respondent nos.7 and 8 are personally present. Respondent no.8 is duly identified by respondent no.7, her father. 2 2. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. We have interviewed respondent no.8 alone in camera. She submits that she was never married to the petitioner and, therefore, there is no question of her going with the petitioner. She wants to be with her parents. In that view of the matter, we do not wish to proceed further in the matter. Respondent no.8 is permitted to go along with her father. 3. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. (S K Katriar, J.) (Kishore K. Mandal, J.) S.K.Pathak/