IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA'mSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITloMS) No. 4%? ”/2010 PETITIONER /' Smt. Devyani Bai W/o Late Shn’ R.K.'Baghel, aged about 53; R/o Amapara, Balod, Tehsil-Balod, District- .Durg (C.G-.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh.,, . Through the Secretaxy, Department, ' D.K.S Bhawan Mantxjalaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Accountant General, Accountant General Office, Fafadih, Biiaspur Road, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Berla, District- , Dur (C.G.) /1. Finance WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA g HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 1962 of 2010 PETITIONER : Smt. Devyani Bai VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: ‘Hon’ble Shri Satish' K. Aqnihotri, J. Present: Shri Rahul Tamaskar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. Ms. Fauzia Mirza, Assistant Solicitor Generai for the Union of India. ~ ORDER ORAL (Passed on 27 day of April, 2010) i‘; 1. This case pertains to grievance of non—grant of retiral dues. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the matter may be referred to the Pension Committee. 2. This Court, in W.P.No.4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retrial dues as the disputed question w , of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19-06-2006 passed in W.P.No.1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh and others), and order dated 13-3-2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh and others Vs. Baijnath Mandal and another). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31$ January, 2008 passed in W.P.No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal (supra) as submitted by learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. This petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms i.e., the office of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and officers \ concerned within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may file additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner, be completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall supply one complete set of the petition to the State counsel as well as counsel‘for the respondent No.2 for transferring the same to the Committee. Sd/— SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI Judge xx Ashok "