IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38138 of 2009 ANIL MAHTO @ ANIL KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 30.11.2009 Heard both sides. Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted under diverse Sections of the Penal Code and Section 3(X) of S.C./S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities ) Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prosecution case itself would show that the dispute is with respect to payment/realization of certain amount. The allegations have been embellished in order to teach a lesson to the petitioner who had in fact advanced certain amount to the informant. It is next contended that going by the allegations contained in the F.I.R. no case under the provisions of S.C./S.T. ( Prevention of Atrocities) Act shall be made out. Referring to annexure -2, which is the investigation report ( final report) ,learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the police/investigating authority have doubted the veracity of the allegations contained in the F.I.R. Having regard to the said submissions, this Court is of the view that the petitioner, for the present, have no reasonable apprehension of being arrested in the present case. The application, therefore, appears to be premature. The application is, accordingly, disposed of. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)