IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 7TH AUGUST 2007 / 16TH SRAVANA 1929 WP(C).No. 24058 of 2007(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ 1. E.DEVADSAN,S/O,RAGHAVAN, PREVENTIVE OFFICER, EXCISE RANGER OFFICE VADAKARA, RESIDING AT MANATHANATHMEETHAL, P.O. CHEVARAMBALAM, KOZHIKODE-17. 2. V. UNNIKRISHNAN, S/O. KRISHNANMOOSAD, PREVENTIVE OFFICER,EXCISE INTELLINGENCE & INVESTIGATION BUREAU, KOZHIKODE, RESIDING AT VADAKKE ILLAM, SREE VALAYARAD, KOMMARI, P.O., KOZHIKODE 673 007. 3. P.KRISHNANUNNI, S/O.ACHUTHAN NAIR, PREVENTIVE OFFICER, EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, KOZHIKODE, RESIDING AT VARANYAN VEED, KAKKODI, KOZHIKODE. 4. K.U.KUMARAN,S/O. KUNHIKANNAN, PREVENTIVE OFFICER, EXCISE ENFORCEMENT AND ANTI NARCOTIC SPECIAL SQUAD, KOZHIKODE,RESIDING AT KALARIYULATHIL VEED,P.O. KALPATHUR, KOZHIKODE DIST. 5. K.SOMASUNDARAN, S/O. K.K.KUNHIRAMAN,PREVENTIVE OFFICER, EXCISE DIVISION, KOZHIKODE, RESIDING AT AMBADI HOUSE, AVIDANALLUR, NADAVVANUR, KOZHIKODE-673 618. BY ADV. SRI.K.J.SAJI ISAAC RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT EXCISE DEPARTMENT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE ASST. EXCISE COMMISSIONER KOZHIKODE. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Antony Dominic, J. ======================== W.P(C).No.24058 of 2007 ======================== Dated this the 7th day of August, 2007. JUDGMENT Petitioner's complaint is that the Preventive Officers in the Excise Department are being posted from Pathanamthitta District to Calicut and in order to accommodate them, petitioners are going to be reverted. It is for this reason that Ext.P1 order is sought to be quashed. It is obvious from Ext.P1 itself that the said order was issued in pursuance to the judgment of this Court in O.P.No.35403 of 2002 as affirmed in the judgment in W.A.No. 1346 of 2006. So long as those judgments are operative, the same are to be implemented and Ext.P1 being in implementation of the aforesaid judgments of this Court, the order cannot be faulted. I do not find any reason to interfere with this Writ Petition and it is only to be dismissed. I do so. Antony Dominic, Judge. ess 7/8