THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.29099 of 2010 DATE: 23.11.2010 Between: Ch.Suresh …Petitioner and The Inspector General of Registration and Stamps Hyderabad and others …Respondents COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER : MS.VIJETHA BORUKKATI COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS 1 to 3: AGP FOR REVENUE THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.29099 of 2010 ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents 1 to 3 in not considering the request of the petitioner to permit the petitioner to execute cancellation deed to “Memorandum of Deposit of Title Deed” executed in favour of respondent No.4 vide document No.7343 of 1999, dated 11.10.1999, registered in the office of respondent No.3 in pursuance of clearance certificate issued by respondent No.4 on 20.10.2001 and consequentially direct respondent No.3 to permit the petitioner to submit cancellation deed to “Memorandum of Deposit of Title Deed” executed in favour of respondent No.4 vide document No.7343 of 1999, dated 11.10.1999 in pursuance of clearance certificate issued by respondent No.4 on 20.10.2001 and register the same for closure of the matter with myself and respondent No.4.” At the hearing, Ms.Vijetha Borukkati, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that her client has been repeatedly approaching respondent No.3 with the document for cancellation of registered deed evidencing deposit of title deed with respondent No.4 and that he has not been receiving the same. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents 1 to 3, on instructions, submitted that the petitioner has never approached respondent No.3 with such a deed. The petitioner has failed to issue any notice to respondent No.3 pointing out that he has not been receiving the document. In the absence of any evidence in support of the petitioner’s plea that he has been approaching respondent No.3 for registration of cancellation of deed, the submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue merits acceptance. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach respondent No.3 with necessary application for receiving the cancellation deed. If respondent No.3 does not receive the same, the petitioner is entitled to initiate appropriate legal action after due notice to respondent No.3. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition, WPMP.No.37062 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 23rd NOVEMBER, 2010. kvni