IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 24TH JUNE 2011 / 3RD ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 17029 of 2011(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- MOHAMMED.C., AGED 57 YEARS, S/O.AAMU, CHITTOTHAYIL HOUSE, P.O.PALLAM, DESAMANGALAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. PIN-695 001. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. PIN-680 003. 3. THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, VALLATHOL NAGAR, THRISSUR. PIN-680 531. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, TALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR. PIN-680 582. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.17029/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT REPORTED IN 2011(1) KHC PAGE 291. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT DT 14.10.2009. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE BUILDING PERMIT DT 9.3.2010 ISSUED BYTHE VALLATHOLNAGAR PANCHAYAT. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT GRANTED TO THE PETITIOENR FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF WELL DT 18.5.2010. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL DT 21.8.2010. EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DT 31.12.2010 OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR. EXT.P7: TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 4.5.2011. EXT.P7(a): TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 4.5.2011. EXT.P8: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.4808/2011 DT 16.2.2011. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 17029 OF 2011 (C) ===================== Dated this the 24th day of June, 2011 J U D G M E N T Ext.P6 is an order passed by the 2nd respondent exercising his powers under the provisions of Act 28 of 2008. Aggrieved by the said order, petitioner has moved the 2nd respondent by filing Ext.P7 representation as provided under Section 28 of the said Act. The revision is pending and in the meantime, petitioner apprehends that the 1st respondent will take steps for implementation of Ext.P6. It is in the above circumstances this writ petition has been filed. 2. I heard the counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents. 3. Having regard to the pendency of Ext.P7 statutory revision, it is directed that the 1st respondent shall consider the said revision with notice to the petitioner and as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 3 months of production of a copy of this judgment. It is directed that, in the meanwhile, further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P6 will be kept in abeyance by the 2nd respondent. WPC No. 17029/11 :2 : 4. Petitioner to produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before respondents 1 and 2 for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp