IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1456 of 2008 1. RAM EKBAL RAI 2. SMT. SUSHILA DEVI 3. LALIT RAI 4. NEELAM DEVI PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SMT. MINAKSHI KUMARI OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 02. 04.08.2010 Heard counsel for the parties. Petitioners are aggrieved by order dated 15.11.2008, passed by learned ACJM, Patna City in Chowk P.S.Case No.77/08(State vs. Ajay Kumar Rai & Ors.). By the order impugned, learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of the offence under section 498A and section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It appears therefrom, upon perusal of the charge- sheet and the case diary, it was found that there is prima facie case available against the accuseds to be tried. In fact, learned Magistrate has referred to certain paragraphs of the case diary in order to lay credence to his satisfaction. It appears that petitioners have challenged the order manifestly attended with mala fide. Petitioners are at liberty to raise these issues at the appropriate stage of the case/proceeding. The application is dismissed with the aforesaid observation. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )