IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 11TH DECEMBER 2009 / 20TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 RP.No. 1161 of 2009() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.21384/2009 Dated 12/11/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): 5TH,6TH AND 7TH RESPONDENTS ------------------------------------------------- 1. M.K.SUNAJA, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT (UPSA) KARSHAKA SAMAJAM UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL THOTTIPAL IRINJALAKUDA. 2. V.R.SREEREKHA UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT (UPSA), KARSHAKA SAMAJAM UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL, THOTTIPAL, IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. REKHA.M.C. LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT (UPSA) KARSHAKA SAMAJAM UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL THOTTIPAL IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4 ------------------------------------------------ 1. THE MANAGER, KARSHAKA SAMAJAM UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL(KSUPS) THOTTIPAL.P.O.. THOTTIPAL, THRISSUR DIST. 2. SMT. P.A.BINDU, PALLATH HOUSE THOTTIPAL.P.O., PARAPPUKARA VIA. IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, IRINJALAKKUDA. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, IRINJALAKKUDA. 5. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVT., GENERAL EDUCATION (K) DEPARTMENT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SHRI S.SUJIN FOR R1 ADV. SRI.P.K.MADHUSOODANAN FOR R2 SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SHRI MUHAMOOD T.T THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ R.P. No.1161/2009-V ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 11th day of December, 2009 O R D E R This review petition is filed by respondent Nos.5, 6 and 7 in W.P.(C).No.21384/2009. As per the Judgment, the claim of the first respondent, in the writ petition, for appointment under Rule 51B of Chapter XIV-A of the Kerala Education Rules was upheld. The apprehension expressed by the review petitioners is that by appointing the first respondent, any of them may be misplaced. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the review petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for the Manager. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the Manager that the Judgment itself is under challenge in W.A. No.2791/2009 and the Division Bench has admitted the writ appeal and has directed the Manager to appoint the first respondent, in the writ petition, in the school. Accordingly, the first respondent in the writ petition has been appointed as L.P.S.A in the school. The issue raised herein need not be considered as the writ appeal is pending. The review petition is therefore dismissed, recording the submission made by the learned counsel for R.P. No.1161/2009 -:2:- the Manager. It is made clear that I have not considered anything on the merits of the matter. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms