IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.28102 of 2008 Between: Thammisetti Govindamma, W/o.Anjaneyulu, aged 42 years, Cooli, Rayavaram village, Markapuram Mandal, Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The District Collector, Prakasam District, Ongole. 2. The Tahsildar, Markapuram Mandal, Prakasam District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue Writ of Mandamus or any appropriate Writ, order or direction declaring the high handed action of the 2nd respondent in trying to dispossess petitioner from the possession of the house site plot No.76 in survey No.381/3, Rayavaram Village, Markapuram Mandal, Prakasam District, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional without following due process of law. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.I.KOTI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.28102 of 2008 ORDER: Petitioner is resident of Rayavaram village of Markapuram Mandal in Prakasam District. She was allotted house site i.e., plot No.76, admeasuring Acss.0.02½ in survey No.81/3 of said village on 12.1.1994. She constructed house under Integrated Novel Development In Rural And Model Municipal Areas housing scheme. Her case is that officials of second respondent came to her plot on 19.12.2008 and directed to vacate land and also threatened with coercive dispossession. Therefore, present writ petition is filed. At the stage of preliminary hearing itself, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (General-Andhra Area) obtained instructions. He submits that writ petition is filed on mere apprehension and officials of second respondent never visited the land. He also submits that if any action has to be taken, it shall be done in due process of law. In view of the above, the writ petition is misconceived and is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ______________ (V.V.S.RAO,J) December 24, 2008. YS To 1. The District Collector, Prakasam District, Ongole. 2. The Tahsildar, Markapuram Mandal, Prakasam District. 3 Two CCs to Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 4 Two CD copies.