1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3903 OF 2011 Mohansing Karansing Vasave .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent .... Shri Pravin S. Patil,Advocate for applicant. Mrs.R.K.Lada,APP for State. .... CORAM : T.V.NALAWADE, J. DATE : 17th October 2011 PER COURT 1] This is second application filed for anticipatory bail by the applicant. The first application was rejected on merits by this Court on 18/7/20011. 2] It is surprising that till today, the applicant has not surrendered. The learned APP submitted that the applicant has been absconding and he could not be traced. In respect of change in circumstance, it was submitted for the applicant that the axe allegedly used by the applicant is now shown to be recovered from other accused. This Court holds that this cannot be a change in circumstance. This Court has considered the evidence collected by the police as against the applicant and this Court has formed opinion that there is sufficient material to make out prima facie case for offences punishable 2 under Sections 307, 149 etc. of I.P.C. 3] In these circumstances, this Court holds that there is no merit in the application. Application stands rejected. (T.V.NALAWADE,J. ) umg/criapln3903-11