IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43508 of 2007 PURUSHOTAM PANDEY & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 3. 09.01.2009 Heard leaned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioners are aggrieved by issuance of summons to them in Complaint Case No. 749 (C )of 2001 under Section 147, 323, 380, 427, 452 of the Penal Code and Section 3 of the Prevention of Witch Practice Act, 1999. The grounds urged for false implication of an earlier litigation pending between the parties when the husband of the present complainant was convicted or that the prosecution witnesses were going hostile before commencement of the trial and that the witnesses of the complainant were interested witnesses is not considered sufficient by this Court to interfere with the order of issuance of summons after enquiry when cognizance has been taken to the satisfaction of the Court. In the event that the prosecution turns out to be a vexatious the petitioners have enough remedies under the Code of Criminal Procedure. This application is dismissed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)