IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC NO.4101 OF 2010 GAURI, W/O LATE KAMAL, R/O MOHALLA NORTH MANDIRI, P.S BUDHA COLONY, DISTRICT PATNA. …………………PETITIONER. VERSUS 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2.MR. GIRISH SHANKAR THE SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 3.MR. SHRIDHAR CHERI BOLU THE COMMISSIONER CUM CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BUDHA MARG, PATNA. ………………………OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 02/ 21.09.2011 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Y.V Giri, learned senior counsel for the opposite parties, this Court would fail to appreciate as to why the payment of the petitioner has not been made. The explanation in the show cause reply for non compliance of the order by way of paucity of fund or some order passed in other cases (Annexure-A series to the show cause reply) cannot be a valid defence, inasmuch as, it is a case of a widow who has been running around for payment of her retirement benefit payable to her husband, who himself was a class-IV employee. That being so, this Court would direct the opposite parties to make payment 2 of the retirement benefit to the petitioner in the revised pay scale and report compliance of the order of this Court to the registry of this Court within a period of two weeks from today. The petitioner, however, will be under an obligation to produce any authentic document at the time of receiving payment which could show that she is the wife of the deceased writ petitioner, Late Kamal. With the aforementioned observation and direction, this application is disposed of. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)