pvr 1 A12-37-11 IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.12 OF 2011 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4407 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.340 OF 1998 M/s.Hill Son & Dinshaw Pvt.Ltd. ...Appellant vs. 1.The Chairman, Bombay Port Trust & Anr. ...Respondents --- Mr.B.B.Saraf with Pankaj Sutar i/b. Khaitan & Jaykar, for Appellant. Mr.V.J.Makhija with Parag Khandhar i/b. M/s.Mulla & Mulla & CB & C., for Respondents. AND APPEAL NO.37 OF 2011 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4408 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.521 OF 1998 M/s.Ardeshir B.Cursetjee & Sons ...Appellant vs. 1.The Chairman, Bombay Port Trust & Anr. ...Respondents --- pvr 2 A12-37-11 Mr.Pankaj Sutar i/b. Khaitan & Jaykar, for Appellant. Mr.V.J.Makhija with Parag Khandhar i/b. M/s.Mulla & Mulla & CB & C., for Respondents. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATED: 13th June,2011 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for both the sides. Perused the impugned orders. The learned Single Judge has given detail reasons for not interfering with the exparte decrees. Looking to the conduct of the present appellants, we see no reason to interfere with the orders. Appeals are ,therefore, rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J.) (R.G.KETKAR,J.)