1 mss CONP68 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 68 OF 2007 IN NOTICE OF MOTIONNO. 4279 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO. 793 OF 2007 JASMINE KURUSH GANDHI .. PETITIONER Vs. MANEK KALYANIWALLA & ORS... RESPONDENTS Ms. Jasmine K. Gandhi - petitioner-in-person Mr. P. S. Dani for Contemner CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI & RAJESH G. KETKAR, JJ. DATED : 30/8/2011 P.C.: We have heard the petitioner who is appearing in person. We have heard learned counsel for the contemner. The contemner is present in the court. The contemner who is a peon in the office of M/s. Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe, Advocate, Solicitors and Notaries is stated to have 2 mss CONP68 made a factually wrong statement on oath in his affidavit of service dated 8/12/2006. In the affidavit filed in the court today the contemner has made a statement that he bows down to the majesty of the court. Learned counsel for the contemner states that the contemner has informed him that he wants to tender unconditional apology to this court. He states that an affidavit to that effect will be filed during the course of the day. 2. The contemner is present in the court. He has undertaken to file affidavit tendering unconditional apology to this court. We accept the undertaking. The contemner shall file such affidavit during the course of the day. The contemner has tendered unconditional apology to this court through his counsel. The said apology appears to us to be genuine and bonafide. We accept it. 3. In view of the unconditional apology which we have accepted, the contempt petition is disposed of. 4. We make it clear that on the merits of the case, we have expressed no opinion. (SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.) (RAJESH G. KETKAR,J.)