THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL PETITION No.8481 of 2008 DATED: 30-04-2010 ORDER: This petition is filed by the petitioner seeking to quash the judgment, dated 29-09-2008, passed in Crl.R.P.No.157 of 2008 on the file of the learned Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, confirming the order passed in C.C.No.716 of 2002, dated 22-07-2008, on the file of the II Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. On 23-12-2008, this Court while ordering notice to the 2nd respondent, dismissed the Crl.M.P.No.7689 of 2008 and directed the matter to be listed after four weeks. Thereafter, this matter did not see the light of the day and for the first time it is listed before me today. Hence it is clear that the learned counsel for the petitioner has not evinced any interest in the matter. The revision petitioner herein, filed a private complaint before the learned IV Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad against A1 and A2 for the offence punishable under Section 420 IPC and the learned Magistrate referred the private complaint to the Station House Officer, Sultan Bazar police station under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. for investigation and report, and the police registered the private complaint as case in Cr.No.296 of 1998 and after investigation filed final report before the Magistrate referring the case as civil in nature. Thereupon, the complainant filed protest petition and after recording sworn statements of the complainant and another, the case was taken on file and the learned Magistrate discharged A2 of the offence punishable under Section 420 IPC. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner herein preferred Crl.R.P.No.157 of 2008 before the learned Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad and the learned Sessions Judge, after re-assessing the entire evidence, dismissed the said revision confirming the order of the trial court. Aggrieved by the same, the present Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner. The trial Court as well as the revisional Court have discussed the entire evidence available on record in proper perspective and accordingly gave a concurrent finding, which, in my considered view, needs no interference. I find no merit in this petition. Accordingly, Criminal Petition is dismissed. _______________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA,J 30th April, 2010. Tsy