IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Revn. No. 2263 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION : 07.11.2006 Madan Lal .... PETITIONER Versus State of Punjab ..... RESPONDENT CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. * * * Petitioner Madan Lal has filed this revision petition against the order dated 10.8.2006, passed by Judge, Special Court, Patiala, whereby charge has been ordered to be framed against the petitioner under Section 21 of the NDPS Act. I have heard counsel for the petitioner and gone through the impugned order. As per the allegations of prosecution, on 13.3.2005 at about 7.00 p.m. in the area of village Nial, the petitioner was found in possession of 30 injections of norphine, 152 capsules of Proxyvan and 200 capsules of Provan without any permit or license. Counsel for the petitioner while citing a judgment of this Court in Deep Kumar v. State of Punjab, 1997 (2) RCR (Criminal) 417, contends that the contents of the recovered contrabands are not beyond the permissible limit. In support of this contention, no material has been placed on record. Even it has not been stated in the petition as to what are the contents of narcotics in the alleged samples. In view of the above, I do not find any ground to interfere in the impugned order of charge. Dismissed. November 07, 2006 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE