CWP No.2905 of 2010.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.2905 of 2010 Date of Decision: 19.07.2010 **** The Sagwal Co-operative Transport Society Ltd. . . . . Petitioners VS. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Karnal & Ors. . . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ravi Dutt Sharma, DAG Haryana ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner has been served with a show cause notice dated 03.02.2010 (Annexure P6) as to why its permit be not renewed for the original route only without including the ‘extended’ route. The petitioner has submitted its reply dated 09.02.2010 (Annexure P7) but even without taking any final decision, it is alleged that the respondents have disrupted the plying of bus by it. CWP No.2905 of 2010.doc - 2 – (2). Notice of motion was issued but no reply has been filed by the respondents despite sufficient opportunities. (3). In these circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that let respondent No.2 take an appropriate decision with regard to the renewal of original as well as the ‘extended’ Route-Permit of the petitioner as per law/Government Policy as early as possible and preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Till then the petitioner shall be allowed to ply its buses on the ‘extended’ route subject to deposit of statutory taxes and/or other statutory requirements. (4). Ordered accordingly. (5). Dasti . (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 19.07.2010 vishal shonkar