IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 8441 of 1993 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- RAJNIKANT B PATEL Versus EDUCATION MINISTER -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 8441 of 1993 MR HD VASAVADA for Petitioner No. 1 MS MANISHA SHAH A.G.P. for Respondent No. 1 NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 2,4,6 MR BHARAT J SHELAT for Respondent No. 3,5 MR AD OZA for Respondent No. 7 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI Date of decision: 01/12/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. The matter was listed on 23rd November, 2004. On that day, the learned advocate for the petitioner was not present and the matter was adjourned to 1st December, 2004. Today also, Mr. Vasavada learned advocate for the petitioner is not present. Hence, the matter is taken up for hearing. 2. The petitioner has by way of this petition prayed for a direction to the respondent authorities to appoint him on the vacant post of Head Master. 3. However, on going through the record, it appears that while admitting the matter, this Court has not granted interim relief. Further the matter is of the year 1993, and it pertains to the appointment of Principal. However, by now the Principal must have been appointed and he must have already retired from the service. Moreover, since the petitioner nor his advocate is present, it seems that they are not interested in the matter. Hence, the petition stands disposed of. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Interim relief if any, stands vacated. [K.S. JHAVERI, J.] /phalguni/