IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 1032 of 2006 DATED: 10.12.2007 Between: Vasapilli Lakshmanamma & ors petitioners And The District Collector/Executive Director A.P. State Housing Corporation, Visakapatnam and ors Respondents THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 1032 of 2006 ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in canceling the first beneficiary list dated 24.3.2005 and preparing a fresh beneficiaries list as illegal and unjust. The petitioners herein claim to be fishermen and residents of Vadanarsapuram and Kothapatnam villages, Rambilli mandal, Visakapatnam district and were affected due to Tsunami and entitled to benefits under G.O.Rt No.77 Housing (RH.I) Department dated 1.3.2005. It is their case that initially a beneficiary list was prepared wherein their names were included and due to certain pressures the said list was cancelled and a fresh list excluding their names was prepared. Hence, the present writ petition. Today when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the orders passed by this Court in W.P. No. 26576 of 2005 dated 1.2.2006. The same was admitted by learned Standing Counsel for first respondent –State Housing corporation and learned Government Pleader for fisheries. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner, Mr K Mohan Ram Reddy for first respondent and learned Government Pleader for Fisheries. They agreed for disposal of the writ petition in terms of the orders passed by this Court in W.P. No. 26576 of 2005 dated 1.2.2006, the operative portion of which reads as under; “In the circumstances, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the first respondent to make necessary enquiry with regard to the eligibility of the writ petitions in consultation with the revenue and other departments and in case it is found that the petitioners are also eligible as per G.O.Rt No.77 dated 1.3.2005, necessary steps shall be taken for providing houses to the petitioners on par with the other beneficiaries”. The issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the above orders of this Court by orders dated 1.2.2006 in W.P. 26576 of 2005. Hence, following the same and in view of agreed stand taken by both the counsel, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the first respondent-District Collector to make necessary enquiries with regard to the eligibility of the petitioners and if they are found eligible as per G.O.Rt No. 77 dated 1.3.2005, to take necessary steps for providing houses to them on par with other beneficiaries. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. NO costs. ____________ N.V.RAMANA,J TVK DATED: 10.12.2007 THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 1032 of 2006 DATED: 10.12.2007