HiGM COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BSLASPUR SinflleBench : Hon'ble Shri Dilip RaosahebDeshmukh. J. Miscellaneous ApReat (C) No. 1020/20&7 Nakulram, S/o Pusau Gond, Aged about 50 years, R/o Village Bazarkurredeehe, Tahsil Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari(Ghhattisgarh) RESPONDENTS versys 1. Balbeer Singh, S/o Hari Singh, Aged about 38 years, 2. Dhaniram, S/o Parasram Netam, Aged about 32 years. Both R/o Village Kukrel, Teh. Nagri, Distt.Dhamtari. 3. The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Aadersh Bal Mandir Road, Behind Amar Talkiss, Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) lyiisceilaneous ADpeal Under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act Present : ShriVimleshBajpai.counseifortheappellant. (Passedon llthSeptember, 2007) Heard on I.A. No. 1 for condonation of delay in filing the . For the reasons msntioned in the application it is allowed and the deiay in filing the appea! is condoned. Heard on admission. The appetlant is aggrieyed by an award dated 28.03.2007 passed by ths Motor Accidents Claims Tribuna], Dhamtari (hereinafter referred to as "the MACT") in Claim Case No.115/20Q& - A - whereby compensation of Rs.25,000/- was awarded in case of grievous injury suffered by the appellant/claimant in the right ankle joint. A perusal of para 12 of the impugned award ctearly goes to show that the evidence of the treating Doctor was not adduced. Dr. V.K. Pandey who certified the extent of permanent disability suffered by the appellanVclalmant at 20% admitted that the appellanfc'claimant had approached hirn 2 years after the accident. No documentary proof was adduced relating to the treatment undertaken or the expenses incurred by the ciaimant. in this view of the matter, compensation of Rs.25,000/- awarded by the MACT is just and reasonable compensation. No ground for interference in the impugned award is called for. the resuit, the appeal is dismissed at th^stage of adrrjission. Sd/- DUip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge Kvr