1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. O R D E R Nathu. Versus State of Rajasthan & ors. S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 136/2006 against the order dated 9-2-2005 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.1, Bhilwara, in Criminal Appeal No.92/2004. ... Date of Order: September 18, 2006 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R. PANWAR Mr. R.K. Charan, for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor for the State. BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the order dated 9-2-2005 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.1, Bhilwara (for short, “the Revisional Court” hereinafter), whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioner against the order dated 15-9-2004 passed by the Judicial Magistrate (West), Bhilwara (for short, “the trial Court” hereinafter), was dismissed. It appears that a complaint was filed by the petitioner, however, neither the petitioner-complainant nor his counsel appeared before the trial Court and, therefore, the trial Court dismissed the complaint. On revision, the Revisional Court 2 also dismissed the revision petition noticing that the petitioner or his counsel failed to argue the matter before the trial Court on 4.2.2004, 18.3.2004, 16.4.2004, 8.6.2004 and 4.8.2004 and that shows that the complainant has no interest in the complaint. At any rate, it cannot be said that the impugned order would result in serious miscarriage of justice or abuse of the process of the Court. The criminal miscellaneous petition is, therefore, dismissed. (H.R. PANWAR), J. mcs