sn^i^i R-li«h3D^I ?ti*iil=r> ^if^t iwwwiiuiu^tviswHJiywyu.KM^iuvMiwa^^hiissi A \<y~- 3-5? -^NIcf^, 8Ti1^<IS, (««11<iy an^r 'irarg? ^W\l shlicn "^ 200 iss^st' sn^i'TOiiwBfl^ W.P. f&l No.7065/2008 PETITIONER Raient|lra Prasad Venna, ag.ed about 51 yesars, t^f Shri Jeevaii Lal Venna, presenfly as Tractor Driver. under the Veterinarv Depar^iaent, GoVf. Cross CatUe Breediag Farm, [rakhuri, Distt. Raipur (CG) son workiit.s Depar^iaent Chaac] Verstis State 2. 3. 4. Bhaw4 Direct<|>r Joint Mana^< Chancl WRIT PETITION TOtDER ARTICIiB ^if Chliattisgarh, tbrough- fhe Secretaiy, of AgriculfrLure, Dau Kalyan Siagh EJn, Maatralaya, Raipur (CG) (Veterinaiy Servicesj, Raipur (CG) Ipirector, Deptt. ofVeteruiary, Raipur jer, Govt. Cross Cattle Breediag Farm- (rakhuri, Distt. Raipur (CG) 226/227 OF THE CONSTITOTION OF INDIA 19-12-2008 Shri Vinay Pandey, couj Shri Arun Sao, Govt. A( Heard. Grievan.ee offhe petitidner Driver on fhe rate fixed by were regularized and he wa|s Annexiu-e P-1. Pay-scale of t[ tim.e, however, the petitioaet scale. Leamed counsel for t]ie has raade several representa^ions however, his representatioijis <=hi<4lci41l TTR^f ^ f^St •(.f^t-^.K ^; aipgit 3ii^i MISHRA, J |nsel for the petitioner. ^vocate for fhe State. • ner is tliat he was appoiated a.s a Tractor ±ie CoUector. After 5 years, his services ^iven pay-scale of Rs. 155- 252/'- vide tie Tractor Driver was revised fixiin time to was deprived of the above icvised pay- petitioner subinits that fhe petitioner for redressal of his above gi-ievances; have not. been decided. He filrther [Tfr^ ^!s!y^Vi /sf^ f^is^T sl ff' M. ~t %-HC-22 •i^2.£i^ 'it. </ 3n^[^il Wi* 3T|^I ^•qi* ^f^d 'S^ 'ttW\'v\^. ynly'Ka, fttcii+iy 3TT^?T 'VRfSR wipfr shNico ''H't 200 ^t^S' sn^i ^nwdfttT 2- specified leatned frelsh subroits fhat he is not pressifa: prays for direction to fb-e re' the petitioner wifhin fhe spec(f On fhe other hand, case the petitioner's files No.2 for redressal of his griei with copy of this order, (he fhe respondeiit No.2 wifhin a| receipt of the representation, In view of the above the instant petition is dispo^i fresh representation before grievaaces within a week froijn such representation being sajne wifhio. a farther peri.4 representation, in accord.anc( siilb 'M^o^^ ^i^df'? Fs^ <f^f^r< '^aiPgiT aii^i ig fhis petition at this stage, however, he jpondeiitsj;o decide the representation of period. counsel for the State submits fhat m. representation before fhe respondent ^ances, witbin one week froin today along same shaU be considered aad decided bv further period pfSweeks froin fhe date of lui accordajice. with law. iiaission ofleamed counsel for fhe State, |ed of with liberty to the pentioner to ffle pie respondent No.2 for redressal of his today along witli copy of this order. On :, fhe respondent No.2 shall decide ttie |id of 8 weeks froru tbe date of receipl with. law. r,^/ • uibde 'e ['T^^H^