THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S.APPA RAO ASMP.Nos.179, 180 and 181 of 2011 in APPEAL SUIT No.966 of 1995 DT.15-11-2011 Between: Appala Venkateswararao … Appellant And Land Acquisition Officer & Special Deputy Collector (L.A) Vijayawada-Guntur-Tenali-Urban Development Authority, Vijayawada, Vijayawada D.M.C and others … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner/appellant: K.V.Bhanu Prasad Counsel for respondents Sri The Court made the following Judgment: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S.APPA RAO ASMP.Nos.179, 180 and 181 of 2011 in APPEAL SUIT No.966 of 1995 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.Eswaraiah) The above petitions ASMP.Nos.179, 180 and 181 of 2011 are filed respectively to condone the delay of 2711 days in filing the appeal, to set aside the abatement caused in filing the L.R application in the place of the deceased sole appellant in the first appeal and to bring the legal representative of sole deceased/appellant on record in the appeal. The lands of the claimants/respondents 2 to 8 and the appellant of an extent of Ac.2.64 cents in R.S.No.16/3 and Ac.0.39 cents in R.S.No.17/2 of Payakapuram, Vijayawada were acquired under Award No.5 of 1986 dated 26-8-1986. There is no dispute that the appellant herein/claimant No.9 is entitled to the compensation in respect of the land of an extent of Ac.2.64 cents in R.S.No.16/3. Insofar as the extent of Ac.0.39 cents in R.S.No.17/2 is concerned, it is the case of appellant/claimant No.9 that he alone is entitled, but not the claimants 2 to 8. This appeal is dismissed for default against the respondents 5 to 8 herein vide order of this Court dated 9-4-2001, and as the judgment of the Court below is inseparable and has become final against the respondents 5 to 8, the appellant herein is not entitled for any relief as against the remaining claimants 2 to 4. In view of the fact that the appeal cannot survive against the respondents 2 to 4 herein alone as the Court below jointly held that the respondents 2 to 8 herein are entitled for Ac.0-39 cents and the judgment has become final insofar as the respondents 5 to 8 are concerned, no useful purpose would be served in ordering these applications to condone the delay of 1271 days in filing the application, to set aside the abatement on account of the death of the sole appellant and to bring L.Rs of the appellant on record. Accordingly, the petitions are dismissed. Consequently, the appeal also stands dismissed. No costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH,J _____________ K.S.APPA RAO,J DATE:15-11-2011 grk THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S.APPA RAO (The order of the Bench pronounced by Hon’ble Sri justice V.Eswaraiah) ASMP.Nos.179, 180 and 181 of 2011 in APPEAL SUIT No.966 of 1995 DT.15-11-2011 GRK