IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 8TH JANUARY 2009 / 18TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 638 of 2009(A) ------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- K.T.THITHACHUKUTTY, AGED 59 YEARS, W/O.ABDUL KAREEM A.P., A P K T HOUSE, CHENDAPURAYA, A.R. NAGAR PO, MALAPPURAM 676 305. BY ADV. SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR (SR.) SRI.T.RAMPRASAD UNNI SRI.S.SREEKUMAR (ADUKKATH) RESPONDENTS : -------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM. 2. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, VENGARA. BY SMT. SUDHADEVI, GOVERNMENT PLEADER. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 638 of 2009 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 8th day of January, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioner submits that she was a Mahila Pradhan Agent. According to her, her agency was extended till 3/07/2009. However, her agency was suspended vide Exhibit P2 order passed by the second respondent. Subsequently, Exhibit P3 Show Cause Notice was also issued, to which she submitted Exhibit P4 explanation. According to the petitioner, whole proceedings were initiated against her for the reason that she had not produced passbook of the account maintained by one Smt. Noorjahan and it is stated that subsequently the passbook was traced out and the same was produced before the authorities as is seen from Exhibit P6. It is stated that despite this, the proceedings are till pending and she continues under suspension. In the aforesaid background, this writ petition is filed praying for a direction to the second respondent to pass orders on Exhibit P3 taking into account Exhibit P4 reply submitted by her. Evidently, the proceedings initiated against the petitioner is still pending. Now that according to the petitioner, she has submitted Exhibit P4 reply, I direct the second W.P.(C) No. 638/ 2009 2 respondent to consider Exhibit P3 in the light of Exhibit P4 and pass appropriate order in this matter. This shall be done expeditiously as possible at any any rate within four weeks from the date of production of copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of writ petition before the second respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE scm