IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.9868 of 2008. Decided on: 14.12.2010. Madan Lal. ……….Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr.Dilip Sharma,Advocate. For the respondents No.1 to5 : Mr.P.M.Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P.Singh, Assistant Advocate General. None for respondent No.6. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Mr. Dilip Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. December 14, 2010. (Rajiv Sharma) (krt) Judge. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.