1 IN THE HIGH COUT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 453 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 141 OF 2009 Krishna Bala Madane & ors..... Applicants Vs. Ramchandra Tatya Madane & ors.... Respondents Mr. S.G. Deshmukh i/b. A.J. Khandarkar Adv. for the applicants None for the respondents. CORAM : R.G. KETKAR, J. DATE : 30th July, 2010. P.C. : 1. This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the Second Appeal as also for bringing on record the heirs and legal representatives of Respondent no. 8A Patalabai @ Anushiya Shamrao Pisal on record. 2. Heard Mr. Deshmukh, learned counsel for the applicant. He states that respondent nos. 8b and 8c are the heirs and legal representatives of respondent 8A and they are already on record. In view of this, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) with no order as to costs. Amendment to be carried out in two weeks from today. [R.G. KETKAR, J.] 2 IN THE HIGH COUT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1624 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 141 OF 2009 Krishna Bala Madane & ors..... Applicants Vs. Ramchandra Tatya Madane & ors.... Respondents Mr. S.G. Deshmukh i/b. A.J. Khandarkar Adv. for the applicants None for the respondents. CORAM : R.G. KETKAR, J. DATE : 30th July, 2010. P.C. : 1. This application is for condonation of delay of 60 days in filing the the application for restoration of S.A. No.141/09. Second appeal was dismissed in default as none appeared on behalf of the appellant. Office remarks indicates that respondent nos. 1 to 7, 8B, 8C, 9, 10A, 10B, 11 and 12 are represented through Mr. Nalawade. Respondent no.8A is reported to be dead. By separate order passed in C.A. No.453/2010 the heirs and legal representatives of Respondent no.8A are already brought on record. 2. In view of this for reasons stated in the civil application, C.A. Is 3 allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a),(b) and (c) with no order as to costs. (R.G. KETKAR, J.)