IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1128 of 2009 Ashok Kumar . Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors . ----------- 2. 28.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was an applicant for the post of Constable under Advertisement No. 1 of 2004. He alleges that he secured 16 points but has been denied appointment while persons with 15 points have been appointed. His representation has evoked no response. There still exist vacancies on which he can be appointed. The pleadings in the writ petition are wholly inadequate. The allegation of discrimination in Paragraph- 7 is vague. There are no details of the names of any candidate who had secured less than 16 points and have been appointed. While the petitioner states that he has represented, no copy of the representation has been enclosed at Paragraph-9 of the writ application. Merely because vacancies may exist, shall vest no right in the petitioner if he has otherwise not been able to demonstrate the same. The Court is not persuaded to start a roving enquiry at the behest of the petitioner to decide whether he has a case for adjudication or not. At this stage, leave is sought to withdraw the 2 application to pursue departmental remedies. The Court makes no observation with regard to the same. The application is dismissed as withdrawn. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J. )