In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh F.A.O. No. 966 of 2009 Date of decision: July 23, 2009 Daya Kaur and others .. Appellants Vs. Sombir and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. A.K. Gahlawat, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Pradeep Goyal, Advocate for the respondents. A.N. Jindal, J This appeal filed by the appellants is accompanied by an application for condoning the delay of 139 days in filing the appeal. In this case, an award to the tune of Rs.8 lacs along with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing the petition till realization has been passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rohtak. Still dissatisfied, they have preferred this appeal. The deceased was 58 years old and was retired Government teacher. He had 18 acres of land. On account of death of the deceased Attar Singh Malik, the property from which he was deriving income is still there and the claimants must also be receiving family pension, therefore, whatever he was contributing the family could be assessed. As such, the Tribunal appears to have rightly assessed the income of the deceased and applied appropriate multiplier. In any case, delay of 139 days has not been properly explained by the appellant. As such, the application for condonation of delay is dismissed. Resultantly, the appeal also fails. July 23, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge