1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.24 OF 2006 IN APPEAL (LODGING) NO.1395 OF 2005 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.541 OF 2004 Mahavir Jain of Mumbai. Appellant vs. 1. Ashish Investments & anr. Respondents Mr.R.M.Tiwari for the appellant. CORAM : R.M. LODHA & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : 27th January 2006 P.C. Heard Mr.R.M.Tiwari, the learned counsel for the appellant. Nobody appears for the respondents despite service. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, we are satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause in filing the appeal in time. 3. The delay in filing the appeal is accordingly condoned. 4. Office is directed to process the appeal and post it for admission as soon as numbered. 2 5. Notice of motion stands disposed of. (R. (R. (R. M. LODHA, J.) M. LODHA, J.) M. LODHA, J.) (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.)