IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2231 of 2009 SURENDRA KUMAR PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 17.2.2009 The grievance of the petitioner in this writ application seems to be that even when his A.C.P. has been notified by an order dated 25.7.2006 the consequential monitory benefit is not being paid. Since the order has been issued by the Superintending Engineer of P.H.E.D., Patna Circle, Patna, the petitioner for ventilation of such grievance should approach the said authority by filing a representation, whereafter the said Superintending Engineer will pass a reasoned order indicating as to why the monitory benefit has been withheld. In the event the Superintending Engineer finds that such monitory benefit is payable to the petitioner, he will again ask the authority concerned to make such a payment within a period of one month from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order. In order to expedite the matter the petitioner is directed to file a copy of his representation alongwith a copy of this 2 order, whereafter the Superintending Engineer must do the needful in the next three months. With the aforementioned observation, this application is disposed of. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/