IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND OCTOBER 2008 / 30TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 20586 of 2005(A) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- DEVADATHAN, HOUSE NO.46, N.S.P.NAGAR, KESAVADASAPURAM, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. N.S.P.NAGAR RESIDENTS' ASSOCIATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, N.R.RAVIKRISHNAN, HOUSE NO.101, N.S.P.NAGAR, KESAVADASAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED ANZAR SRI.N.NANDAKUMARA MENON, SC, TVPM.CORPORATION THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.20586/2005 APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE COMPLAINT NO.756/05 DT, MARCH 2005 FILED BY THE IST RESPONDENT BEFORE THE LOK AYUKTA. P2:- COPY OF THE OBJECTION DT. 13.56.05 FILED BEFORE THE PETITIONER HEREIN BEFORE THE LOK AYUKTA IN COMPLAINT NO.756/05. P3:- COPY OF THE ORDER DT. 13.6.05 PASSED BY THE LOK AYUKTA IN COMPLAINT NO.756/05. P4:- COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DT. 1.7.05. P5:- COPY OF THE PETITION DT. 6.6.05 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE TOWN PLANNING OFFICER OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT. P6:- COPY OF THE PETITION DT. 30.11.04 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE TOWN PLANNING OFFICER OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT. /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE tss KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ----------------------------------------- W.P(C) No. 20586 of 2005 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of October, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner approached this court aggrieved by the steps taken by the Corporation to demolish the alleged unauthorised construction made by the petitioner. On 11-7-2005 this court passed the following order:- “Ext.P3 shall be taken, only as a direction to the Corporation to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law, if he has made any unauthorised construction. Therefore, Ext.P4 is stayed. But, the Corporation shall, if it is satisfied, after hearing the petitioner and the complainant, that the petitioner has made any unauthorised construction, proceed against him in accordance with law without any delay.” The said order is made absolute and the writ petition is disposed of. (KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE) ahg. KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ----------------------------------- W.P(C).No.20586 of 2005 ----------------------------------- JUDGMENT 22nd October, 2008