IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 25.02.2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUDHAKAR W.P. No.39850 of 2006 (O.A.No.8083/99) Pargunan .. Petitioner vs The Principal, Teachers Training Institute, Tiruvallur District .. Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition came to be numbered by transfer of O.A. No.8083 of 1999 on the file of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal directing to call for the records pertaining to the Proceedings of the respondent in Na.Ka.No.851/A1/99 dated 09.09.1999 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to bring the petitioner's service in the time scale of pay and to regularise the service on the date of completion of five years of service with all consequential benefits. For Petitioner : Ms. C.N.G. Nirai Mathi For Respondent : Mr. S. Sivashanmugam Government Advocate O R D E R This writ petition is filed to call for the records pertaining to the Proceedings of the respondent in Na.Ka.No.851/A1/99 dated 09.09.1999 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to bring the petitioner's service in the time scale of pay and to regularise the service on the date of completion of five years of service with all consequential benefits. 2. The petitioner appointed as Office Assistant on daily wage basis. An impugned order dated 09.09.1999 was informed the petitioner that only whenever the petitioner's service is in need of, after getting permission from the respondent he has to attend the work and for the days he has worked he will be paid salary. The impugned order reads as follows: ,e;epWtdj;jpy; jpdf;Typ CHpauhfg; gzpg[hpa[k; jpU v!; gh;Fzd; vd;gth; ,e;epWtdj;jpy; jpdf;Typ CHpahpd; gzp njit Vw;gLk; ehl;fspy; kl;Lk; Kjy;thpd; Miz bgw;W gzpf;F tuntz;Lk; vdt https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ [k;. gzpg[hpa[k; ehl;fSf;F kl;Lk; Cjpak; bgw;W jug;gLk; vdt[k; , jd;K:yk; Mizaplg;gLfpwJ/ 3. Challenging the impugned order, the petitioner was filed Original Application in the year 1999. The Tribunal granted an interim order on 24.12.1999 and it was extended until further orders. By virtue of the interim order, the petitioner continues in service. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the G.O. Ms. No.22, P and AR Department, dated 25.02.2006, the petitioner's claim has to be considered for regularisation and other consequential benefits. 5. Heard Mr. S. Sivashanmugam, learned Government Advocate. 6. In view of the changed circumstances and subsequent events, the petitioner is entitled to make further representation for appropriate relief in terms of the G.O. referred above and the same shall be considered and disposed of on merits within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation. If the petitioner is in service it shall not be disturbed till his claim is considered on merits. This Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Sd/- Asst.Registrar /True Copy/ Sub.Asst.Registrar vga To The Principal, Teachers Training Institute, Tiruvallur District + 1 cc to M/s.C.N.G.Ezhilarasi,Advocate,SR.13242 + 1 cc to Government Pleader,High Court, Madras.SR.13524 W.P. No.39850 of 2006 RSN(CO) SRA/15.3.10 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/