AB 3697/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Munir, learne d Public Prosecutor, Assam appearing for the State respondents. The petitioner apprehending arrest in connection with Paltan Bazar PS case No. 3 29/2011 registered under Section 304/386/367/420/406/457/493/506/34 IPC has file d the present application under Section 348 Cr.P.C. seeking the privilege of pre arrest bail. The prayer of the petitioner for granting the pre arrest bail was earlier reject ed by this Court vide order dated 31.10.2011 passed in AB No. 2115/2011. I have perused the materials available in the case diary as produced by the lear ned Public Prosecutor. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and upon consideration of the m aterials available in the case diary as well as the nature of allegations made, I am of the view that the privilege of pre arrest bail cannot be granted to the petitioner, that apart the petitioner is avoiding the investigating officer. Hence the prayer for pre arrest bail stands rejected. The anticipatory bail application stands dismissed.