XI—HC—7S ammm WW§WW %ai1%tra_n%¥1 '26. 10.2004 Shu' Nmdra Chandel come! for the petitioner. Shn' Akhil‘ Agrawal, liakex for the State. Heard; Leamed counscl for the peti oner ,subtm'ts that the Hatter rclates t0 Nansfer of the petitioner.“ He further 'ts that the petitioner has served seven years in the naxalite area and he has been transferred to Bijapur, Dantewada, which is also a naxalite fk also subm'ta that for the mam the petitioner my be m’ven an opportunity of hiing the detdled representation before the eonpetent authority of the resp s, which shall be considered on its own merits in accordance with law. Having considered and with expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, in the opinion ofthis Court, ds ofjustice will be served ifa direction is given to the petitioner to make a de 'led representation raising his gievanees espondents along with a copy of the - petition md this order,~within ten days, and on such representation being med, the competent authority of the respondents shall decide the sane on its own neiits in e accordance with law as early as po e preferably within six weeks horn the date of receipt of the representation. 'ng this period, the petitioner nay be allowed to continue at Samgarh. It 's nude clear that if any gievanee sn‘il remains, the petitioner nay avail the available under the law. With the aforesaid observations this petition stands disposed of. L N. Consequently MWP.N0.4052I 004 also stands disposed of.‘ Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge , s on t r s ' l