^<\° IN THB HIOH COURT O? JU©IGAfi?URg ^T BILASP[Ja (03) W.I'S PSTIIia:a'sT MQ,--"?.^"^'©y2004 BBSMBBI Swail laaaar Shrivastava S^o Late diri B,E>»diirivasta-va» agad aboat 38 yeaEs^ @cGUS|ati<xi goveznmen-fe seryi©®» working as ©ffiieeAssistanfc ©radeII^ tfL@ek Bltocatioii ©fffiee^ ©hararaa^lAsjpi^sfe Karxleea? (©©)• vsmmwwt ^ l? 21 3^ fbe Stafe®©fiSahafctiagazfaf gbsough liie sa@refea2?y A3ira <3!atl %^»a inusudhit <3ati D&kas vlNiagl Manteaiay^ ®»K«s.Baildiagy Baipur (<3©) *S^Q ©lareGt®^ Adim jati 1'atiia ^p^su<diit jati ^tleas ^Lbhag, Raipur. ©lleet©E|i Kssalws EiafeMet l&nlea^ (©©)• Asais^Qfe @anEaissi©a®i'»sjMiBR^&ti ^catiha inusudatt jati »B4toixaaE«»«drirtiid-fcas vitebag^ JSapleai? (@@)«' - a ' . J: 5? - ^QasaSK atStelefe BitaGafeioo ©gfieeart ia3?ama^ NOI?^ aastsar laaleeg (©©)• RIS PB'EITIGN ^®ERAB1'Id<BS 226/227 ©?'aiB ioisiill^'EI^ff ©P IKSI^' „!..„" •; .,!...". f •:-,': ^: L-..-^^ XI.HC—78 ^n^r "SFT'Rpft^ ^T^T ^TT^T^TW II; ^- ^ WR^ff^Wi^ a3~^T ^TFTT^F?, ^xi1^4l<o, [®i<ni^^< j4.P^o. ^^4-3/^^f- • rfSR------------ ^200 3^T 'qiRT (<lq^<^T) ^^1W^f??T3<^T 29.10.2004 Shri Rakesh Antony, Shri Akhil Agrawal^ Application for zu'gent | Heard. L^arned coun^el for ttt aiatter bearing W<P< No. 234 v- State of Chhattisgai'h ait order dated 13.9.2004. He order and prays for similar <j The prayer 1s not oppo| Sotie alnd Tlie petltloner was 2003, but he was deliberat^ Vidhan Sabha elcctions ar^ elections ai'e to be held. petitions before this Court oS^. order directing the State to relieved those persons in | iinuiediatelY aftcr fhe Vidhaii State and its officials are thet them so as to join to the pl^ uicUiy of Llieiu Iiave sIiiTle(| <=bl^{<r<^l4 'HPRRTf ^ 'fe^ <r^^i< ^3:JfOT3?!^T c^ounsel for the petitioner. Pdnel Lawver for the Statc. ' heai'ing is allowed. petitioner submits that in similar ^4/2004 (Jageshwar Das Voishnav -^ |d others) this Court has passed an jlias produced tlie copy of the said i>rder. ^ed by the State couusel, maldn tdng request for being relieved since ^ly not relieved on fhe pretext that there and thercaftcr, Lok Sabha of the employees have tiled writ this Couit had passed a detailed t'elieve them. The State shoLild have the vear 2003 or in QIW case Sabha or Lok Sabha elections. The tiiselves responsible for not relieviiig ^ices of posting. During this period, llieir faiiiilies, gol admilted tlieir T XI-HC—78 w^r "SRT f^Nr iT^IT ^1^TiF1:?W \/d ^- ^ <n»T<?1T ^l*<lcb 'y^T r^i^i<n^ ^Til'M^Ko, [®i<ni<y^< ^.P<No. ^^4-S>/2^^; "^200 a^T-q5RT(-^t3^r) ?^IW Trf?H 3??^?T -2' hls children in schools aiid jusjt assignuig SLay reason, s^tr^ Having thus considcrc^l concenied, the sai'ae is not and is set aside. The questi^h for relieving. Counsel for the paxtie|5 given opportunity to iiiake Tlie petitioner may m^ke from today, and on such repi|e€ be considerecl as early as pos State would consider all facts and circumstances un|< not relieved. It is made cleaii petitioner may avail the rem<| This petition is dispo^ observations. C,C. a^ per rule^. ohl^^ft'1 'WR^ff ^* 'fe1^t i^f^K ifrsfRm^^T by one llne cryptic order without asfers have been canceUed. [^ so far a6 order dated 18.6.2004 is mstainable aiid has to be set aside renimns as to what 1s to be done subniitted tha-t the petitioner be representation. representation within 10 days [esentation being filed, the same wiU |sible prcferably ¥7ithiii4 weeks/The of the matter mid the relevaiit kler which he wa.s transferred and that if any grievaiice still remains, ?dy under laiv. tcd of with the above direction^/ asi^ects Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge '^