IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No.6488 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 5.10.2010 Ravinder Pal Singh. ....... Petitioner. Versus Atul Nanda. ....... Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present: Shri Puneet Bali, Advocate with Shri Hittan Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner. .... 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? .... Mahesh Grover,J. The only prayer made in this revision petition is that the Rent Controller, Mohali be directed to pass an appropriate order on the date fixed in the eviction application titled “Ravinder Pal Singh Versus Atul Nanda” in terms of the judgment dated 7.1.2010 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in C.R.No.3577 of 2006. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that four adjournments have been granted but the application for ejectment of the respondent has not been decided despite the fact that the tenant- respondent has intentionally and deliberately not deposited the provisionally assessed rent. C.R. No.6488 of 2010(O&M) -2- .... After haring the counsel for the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the instant petition with an expectation that the Rent Controller will decide the ejectment application pending before him in accordance with law that may be brought to his notice on the date fixed in it as its non-adjudication has been made a ground for grievance herein. October 05,2010 ( Mahesh Grover ) “SCM” Judge