ngl c RB.N0 Piesented by SM9x IF!“ WW1 @3 3 rm: 7- « W g-UM 3 E L h’ '” it:M 3!3w I w ~ l Sie Benh‘ vi“ . 1“ ? 5"" ]mm [ml 95. A my 3 kn r3 I m Mu? E 1 £5, ‘ ’4 FM XI—HC—78 WW,W,W§ mp 5159)] o£ . ..... . mg 200. WW5 (W) WWiwm wwwm ‘ v é a m m W$TE=W‘ mmm Soma 30~8-2006 Mr. Vishnu Koshta, coun Mr. Satish Gupta! Dep on advance copy. Heard both the counsel. By the instant writ petiti n under Article 226 of the Constitution of indie. the petitioner has chali nged his transfer order dated 29-7-2006 (Annexure P-2) passed by r spondent No.3, whereby he has been transferred from Middte Scho Block: Durgukondai. The said transfer has be n made under the rationalization scheme. Ciause 7 of the rationalizatio scheme provides for an appeai by the aggrieved person. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has aiready preferred an appeal bef re respondent No.2 on 4~8-2006 and that appeai is not being decided by spondent No.2, therefore, respondent No.2 be directed to decide the appeal to’which learned counsel appearing for the Stateirespondents has no objecti n. Having heard learned cou eel for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the aee, respondent No.2 is directed to decide the appeai of the petitioner with of this order, in accordance with l w. With the direction aforesa Consequentiy, M.(W.)P. 1 for the petitioner. Govt. Advocate f0{ the State/respondents, , Saarwandi to Primary Schooi, Dangra, o 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy i , the petition-stands disposed of. 548/2006 aiso stands dispose / , Sdl- L.C. Bhadoo Judge u s N i 3