fl I';7 ^r l^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.A. N0. tlUf /2006 |<u> UB8 f» APPELLANT PLAINTIFF RESPQNDENTS ..-•".eyi\x .'¥'-"y^>' <?ky^ ^\..-" ^-«-?r ^.--'•- ^lhaduram Kurre, Aged about 60 years, S/o. Late Keshlal Kurre, Agriculturist, R/o. Thakkarpara, Ward No.9, Satnamipara, Gudhiyari, District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS Smt. Purnima Srivastava, Aged about 45 years, Widow of Late Alok Srivastava, R/o. Plot No. 227, Sector I, Geetanjali Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) Rakesh Agrawal, Aged about 39 years, S/o. Haribhusan Lal Agrawal, R/o. Station Road, Raipur, Tahsit & District Raipur (C.G.) ji. 3l|^/clb 3^- State of Chhattisgarh, CT,EaKtoA-G' AS Through the District Coltector, District Raipur (C.G.) APPEAL UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1R OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE —78 'S's? •^S-illd'4, yfllwis, IsRffFiy ..M.fc:........^J... sn^t^il^iN? ^nsn^f^iN? ^F]'^^!^^ ^Wff ^f fS^ <i^^K ^•stlTOsnt?! S.S. Hon'bieShri Justice N.KIAaarwaI '.10.2009 o^-: o. Ot'll i f^.i ihul Tamaskar, ^dvocate, appears on behalf of Shri Advocate fot Shri Kshitiz Sharma, a< Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, i with the passaae of time this 1^/1 vocate for Lc snt No. 1 & 2. Learned counsel appe^ring for She appeliant submits that ^ppeai has becqme infructuous. Accordingiy, the appe^l is dismissed as having become Infructuous. No order asto ccfets. Consequently, pendin^ appHcations, stand disposed of. IVI(C)P No. 545/06 also stand^ disposed of. Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge