Js-*^^ SiiiQ^ 3ew|^ ^ IN THE HIGH COORT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P. No.4-s3/ /2004 PETITIONER: 1 crvUv^ ...•••"; o .'..••^"^''^ y*%^ ^^^ «®'5i-'\..--"c^' RESPONDENTS: N. K. Deshmukh S/o Shri Ishwari Prasad Deshmukh, A/o Forest Colony, In front of Jathar Club, Durg, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS 'w 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Forests, DKS Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Divisional Forest Officer, Durg(Chhattisgarh) 3. Chhattisgarh Nirvachan Aayog Through the State Election Oficer, Raipur, (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARIICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS KSD CERTIOEARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIKECTIONS ^^^^^^S^"^"'^T^;--^'?'?^-T ;.:^' ^^l^i^*i,gsS!al't!<.i<a,,fa<il.i'9y,< ,^ ' • W-^^o-^B^f^^ ;^s?®^; 'iman^rwwT WN II! siR?T'(ra%' ca^ 9-12-2004 Slul Prat.eek Slianua, Shri TJ.N.S. Deo, Oovt, Application for urgcnt Heard on I.A. No. 90S from fiUng the typed copies Heard. C( relates to transfer of the present the petitioner may tlie delaUed rcpreseiitalioii ^i^td^'^ "iffi^ ^ ^^t <^jt$j< ^ aifiin gi]*<r Adv. for Itie petilioiicr. Adv. for the State hcanng is aUowcd. 6/2004 for exemption from fllini the typed copies of the doci.jinents. Not opposcd. The application is all^wed. The petitioner is exempted lof the documents. ounsel for the petijtioner subuiits that the uiatter petitioner. IIe subm.its that the transfer is against the polic^. He further submits ttiat for the l be given an opportunity of filmg ibefore tlie coiupeleiil aulliority of the respondents, which shaj]] be considered on its own merits in accordaacc with law. Having considered anp without expressing any opmlon on the nierits of the case, ir^ fhe opinion of this Coiirt, ends of justice wiU be served if a di^ection is given to the petitioner to make a detailed representa|:ion raising his grievances before fhe coinpetent aufhority of ^he respondents along wifh a copy of the petition and thls or(|ter, withln 15 days, and on such ''0—50,000. aBffiB:^SRI?!l:|g8 IgBISsia&lgg 3 T<-^^ Srt%^nl*(< ,:Tste)|.91^< -Ei^.\ffi&:..M5.a'f^.&fe! sn^ril^? (''i^irl^'t'iT) 371^1 W K-i' 'STT SS^! *4i* °hwyrahimrff ^' 'fe^t tf^R^n ^'sffOTan^T jrepresentation beuig filed, the |respoiideiils shaU decide ttie |accordance witTi law as early as tmssible preferably within two jiaonfhs froiu thc datc of rcccipt Leamed counsel for the Ipetitioner has not been relievedi competent authority of the same 011 its owii uicrits iii |ofthc rcprcscntation. Ipetltioner submits tliat the [ He prays that the petitioner jmay be aUowed to continue. | i It is directed that if the p^titioner has not been relieved jand other person has not joinbd in place of petitioner, the j'petltloner may toe allowed to conjtlnue tiU the representation is Idecided. It is made clear that iif tbe petitioner has ak-eadv ^_-—_. .. „ - „ —^- „„ ^-_—-_- ^, jbeen relieved or other person |ias already joined in place of I.. -.,. ,. - , ...I . jthe petitioner, ttus order willjnot entitle the petitioner to 1 rejoin at the earlier place of po^ting. Witli Uie aforesaid obseijvatioiis, lliis peLilioii staiids jdisposed of. g 1 Conscqucntiy M.W.P.Nol 4868/2004 also stands 1 disposed of. | I ! " Certified coov as per ru'—------ j -„„.„_-.^^ __^..-„ ^^ j Fakhruddui 1 Judge K^ /->.'. ^ •.", • \ sa