CRLR No. 72 of 2010 WITH Int. Relief App. 350 / 10 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Ajay Singh Bisht, Advocate present for the revisionist. Heard. This revision is directed against the order dated 21.01.2010, passed by Judge, Family Court, Nainital, in Criminal Misc. Application No. 225 of 2008, whereby said court has enhanced maintenance from Rs. 1,000/- per month to Rs. 1,300/- per month under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. The revisionist seeks further enhancement of the maintenance. Brief facts of the case are that the revisionist Shyam Singh is father of the respondent R.C. Arya. Earlier he filed Criminal Misc. Application No. 151 of 2001 under Section 125 of Cr.P.C., in which a consented order was passed by the court concerned, on 22.08.2003, directing the respondent R.C. Arya to pay Rs. 1,000/- per month to his father (revisionist). It is nobody’s case that said amount is not being paid to the revisionist. The revisionist appears to have moved an application for enhancement of the maintenance amount on which learned Judge, Family Court, Nainital, enhanced the amount of Rs. 1,000/- only by Rs. 300/-, and directed the respondent to pay Rs. 1,300/- per month from the date of order to the revisionist. Learned counsel for the revisionist argued that in view of the price rise and medical expenses said amount is insufficient. He further pleaded that the salary of the son (respondent) has increased. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the revisionist and after going through the impugned order, this Court does not find any error of law committed by the trial court in the order dated 21.01.2010, passed in Criminal Misc. Case No. 225 of 2008. Therefore, the revision is dismissed summarily. (Interim Relief Application No. 350 of 2010 also stands disposed of). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 20.04.2010 HN 2