CRR No. 412 of 2011(O&M) **** Harjit Singh vs. State of Punjab and others Present: Mr. S.P.Soi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. S. Chandumajra, DAG, Punjab. **** Service is complete. This is a revision challenging the rejection of application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel has argued that the charge itself was framed on 30.09.2010 and, therefore, to conclude its evidence slightly more than four months had been granted to the prosecution which is not appropriate. Learned DAG has, however, defended the order. In my considered opinion it cannot be said that the prosecution was given enough opportunity to lead its evidence. Consequently the impugned order is set aside and the trial Court is directed to grant two effective opportunities to the prosecution to lead its evidence. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE March 18, 2011 sunita