IN THE HISH CGtJRT OF HADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPBR WRIT PETITI0N ^~_f OF 1994 Ramesbwar Puri Goswami - VersuS - Madhya Pradesfa Audyogilc Keradra " Vikas Nigam (Ratpur) Ltd. &-ofhsrs. ... PETITIOHER. RESPONDENTS. v> PETITION UNDER ATICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUING A WBIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDHUS ETC.ETC. AND ALSO FOR ISSUING NECESSARY DIRECTIONS 1. Particulars of the petitioner s Raaeshwar Puri Goswami S/o Shri Gulab Puri Goswami, aged about 37 years, r Assistant Land Acquisi-tien Officer, M.P. Audyogik Kendra Vikas Nigam , - 8/4, M«&. Colony, ^ . . , shailendra Nagar, Raiptir (MP). 2. Particulars of the Respoadents s (^l- Madhya Pradesh Audyogiic Kendra Vikas Nigam{Raipur)Ltd. 99> Samta Colony, Raigur,y Through its Managing l.'irector. 2- The Managing Director, M*P. Audyogik Vikas Nigam Ltd«, •Panchanan' 2nd Floor, Malviya Nagar, Bhopal» 3- The Chainian, M.P. Audyogik KendraVikas Nigam, aipur?'-td., C/o Managing Birector, . MP Vuelyogik'Kender Vikas Nigan Ltd. , 'Panchanan' 2nd Floor, ttalviya Nagar,BbopallMP}. Particulars of the erder against whieh the petitiQEt is made : i(!i<5!!ii»'3i ^ ^..^^..'j ^^"^"^~' ^''^ r"^ .y^ i ^? f. .IL <^"""w i ^r^-^'^<i -^. ^'^^ ^ .. ?"*t?^s ^ ^-•r'. •"•^^ ;; »-^ 4iGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : StLASPUR WRiT PETST10N N0.3301 OF 1994 -fc i U 1UNC.K [ESf'0'''iDE?'ilo iWrit oeiitio' Singh f*h^ 3flt^=- 1 f^9.ms:s?nvfs?' r'uii ^sosswsfTs: VSfSUS Macihya Pradesn Audvog'K Kendra vikas Nigam (Raipu-) S-td. s. Others ;F->^1^ ^^ ^ /-^ " ' "^ ^-^ t f^ ^ ^ ;/r^r3T '^ ^"1*^** - ^1^ i^t ?^ V-i 4':E i'^:^.?^wa' .^fc»,^T J •?'"-< JI<^ :i*l^i ^ inosr .'•'.ITXIG!^ ^^jQi^.^.s o? in©^ons^iu'aon O'T iUQis; -c iench : Hon'bie Shri Saiish K. Agnitoiri, J. r'resent:- None ror ths ;-.ji.iv/S i^;s . 'i^^J 4*^3y*u3^ i ^. ^^rrf1^;^ ^/^-^. ij^^^i .?t^^Bt: !l i':;r"^ e^ ^ ^ :I^^CI"..1.; ^I|iTk^^ V/^L^ :tt\f-.v^,-i^ 'nn unif^^ w^nsiHKHffiOS. couns^i ior ^08 rssDonoenis •OKDtR (OKAL) (psssafj nn thi?: 8'" ~av nf Poh': ,aru •?nim i he mafier as caiied tor heanno 'Ewice- un botn occasions, nons apoears nor is anv reprssentgGon made on bshaif of the oetitioner. The oetitioner may noi oe interesSed in the matter. 2) in view of the above. the wn'E oetiiion is ciismissed for want of orosecuiio' Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge uowri