IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44087 of 2009 1. SRI PULICE YADAV S/O AMIR YADAV R/O VILL.- PIPRA DEVA BABA STHAN, P.S.- BARAUNI, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI 2. SRI WAKIL YADAV S/O AMIR YADAV R/O VILL.- PIPRA DEVA BABA STHAN, P.S.- BARAUNI, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI 3. SRI ARJUN YADAV S/O AMIR YADAV R/O VILL.- PIPRA DEVA BABA STHAN, P.S.- BARAUNI, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 2/4/2010 Heard counsel for the petitioners and counsel for the State. Prayer for bail of the petitioners was rejected on merits by order dated 16.5.2008 in Cr. Misc. No.8609 of 2008 with an observation that trial of the petitioners should be concluded within a period of one and half years, i.e, by 16th November, 2008. Liberty was given to the petitioners to move for bail initially before the trial court if trial is not concluded within the aforementioned period. Pursuant thereto the petitioners seem to have moved the trial court and the trial court had recorded reasons for not concluding the trial. Non receipt of the inquest report seems to be the only reason for not concluding the trial. Counsel for the petitioners, however, informs this Court that the inquest report has been received and the argument in the case has already been concluded whereafter the trial court has fixed the case for judgment on 5th April, 2010. In view of the aforesaid, it becomes clear that this 2 application for bail has become infructuous and is dismissed accordingly. Let a copy of this order be sent to the trial court. Abhay Kumar ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)