The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.22520 of 2011 Date: 16-11-2011 Between: V.Ramesh ..... Petitioner AND Central Power Distribution Company of A.P., Ltd., Rep. by its Divisional Engineer, Hyderabad, and another. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Pramod Singh Counsel for the Respondents: Mr.O.Manohar Reddy, SC for APCPDCL The Court made the following : Order: In this Writ Petition, the grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents have not been releasing power supply to the electricity connection in respect of ground floor portion i.e., TRT 116 of premises bearing No.2-2-3/125, Vidyanagar, Hyderabad, in spite of his representation, dated 22-11-2010. In the counter-affidavit filed by respondent No.2, it is inter alia stated that the petitioner’s application for release of power supply has not been considered for the reason that his brother viz., Satish has raised an objection and that there is a title dispute regarding the subject premises pending before the civil Court. At the hearing, Sri Pramod Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, has stated that a suit for partition is pending between the petitioner and his brother Satish. In my opinion, when there is a dispute pertaining to the immovable property, which is the subject matter of the civil suit, appropriate course for the petitioner is to file an application in the pending civil suit claiming the same relief, which is claimed in the present Writ Petition. In such an event, the Civil Court will be in a better position to appreciate the pleas raised by the respective parties relating to their title and lawful possession. In this view of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of without going into the merits of the case and with liberty to the petitioner to move appropriate application in the pending civil suit for release of the power supply. As a sequel, WPMP.Nos.31387 and 36465 of 2011 are disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 16th November, 2011 LUR