IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25894 of 2008 JAI MANGAL SINGH S/O LATE LAKHAN SINGH R/O VILLAGE- BINDOL, P.S.- BIHTA, DISTRICT- PATNA ………….Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. KAMESHWAR SINGH S/O LATE SURAJ SINGH 3. ARUN SINGH S/O KAMESHWAR SINGH 4. ARJUN SINGH S/O KAMESHWAR SINGH 5. NAGENDRA SINGH S/O LATE NEEMA SINGH 6. MUKESH SINGH S/O UPENDRA SINGH 7. AMRENDRA SINGH S/O UPENDRA SINGH 8. UPENDRA SINGH S/O NEWA SINGH ALL R/O VILLAGE- BINDAUL, P.S.- BIHTA, DISTRICT- PATNA …………..Opposite Parties ----------- 2. 05.05.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioner who is the informant of the present case is aggrieved by the order dated 13.11.2007 by which the Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Patna has set aside the order of non-discharge of the opposite party nos. 2 to 8 in Complaint Case no. 99 (C) of 2004 by Criminal Revision No. 117/2006. On going through the Revisional Order, I find that it has considered that the complaint was an abuse of the process of the court and the Magistrate had not applied his judicial mind before refusing to discharge the opposite party nos. 2 to 8. In view of such, the application is dismissed. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)