IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.34149 of 2011 Md. Aiyub & Anr. Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 13.10.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Jokihat P.S. Case No. 31 of 2002 corresponding to G.R. No. 393 of 2002 arising out of complaint case no. 2153C of 2000 registered under Sections 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the informant had executed a deed of interest by mortgaging her land for taking Rs. 25,000/- from the petitioners on 17.07.1991 and on 09.06.2000 when the informant went to return the money it was found that the sale deed was executed in favour of the petitioner no.1 and his brother. It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioners that the informant has retracted from her initial version and to that effect a compromise petition has been filed before the learned court below. On merits, it appears that for cause of action of 1991 i.e., after nine years, the complaint was filed which got registered 2 as police case in 2002 which clouds bonafide of accusation. This court is not inclined to interfere only because the case was instituted in 2002. On merits, it appears that it is a fit case for grant of regular bail. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioners and try to dispose off the same preferably on the same day if the petitioners surrender and pray for regular bail within a period of six weeks from today. With the above observation, the anticipatory bail application of the petitioners is disposed off. Let the order be faxed to the learned C.J.M., Araria in connection with Jokihat P.S. case No. 31 of 2002 corresponding to G.R. No. 393 of 2002 arising out of complaint case no. 2153C of 2000 at the cost of the petitioners. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)