IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.M. No. 14816 of 2010 in/and Civil Writ Petition No. 14959 of 2010 Date of decision: 13.10.2010 Balwinder Kumar ...Petitioner Versus Kurukshetra University Kurukshetra and others ...Respondents Present: Mr. J.S. Virk, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.S. Virk, Advocate for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. Madan Pal, Advocate for respondent No. 3. RANJIT SINGH J. C.M. No. 14816 of 2010 Application allowed. Reply taken on record. Civil Writ Petition No. 14959 of 2010 There is dispute whether the petitioner had appeared for practical examination or he was not permitted to appear on the ground that sum of Rs. 30,000/- was demanded by the College. The College has filed reply denying this fact as asserted in the writ petition. The counsel for the University, however, points out that this is fight between the college and the student and the University never passed any order debarring the petitioner from appearing in the practical examination. It will not be appropriate to go into the disputed question of fact as raised in the petition. However, to protect the interest of the petitioner, directions are issued to the respondents to permit the petitioner to appear in supplementary examination likely to be held in near future. The present writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. October 13, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE