IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.156 of 2009 1. INDU SHARMA @ SMT.INDU SHARMA, Wife of Dhaneshwar Sharma, 2. SINDHU SHARMA @ SMT. SINDHU SHARMA, Wife of Ram Narain Sharma, 3. BINDU SHARMA @ SMT. BINDU SHARMA, Wife of Sri Ashok Kumar Sharma, All are daughter of late Hanuman Sharma, resident of village – Mathiya Jirat, P.O. – Motihari, P.S. – Chhatauni, District – East Champaran. …. Defendant 1st Set/ Petitioners. Versus 1. MOSTT.SHANTI SHARMA@SHANTI SHARMA, Wife of late Hanuman Sharma. 2. RAJESH SHARMA 3. PAPPU SHARMA, Both are sons of late Hanuman Sharma 4. SUDHA KUMARI SHARMA 5. ARCHANA KUMARI SHARMA 6. PRIYANKA KUMARI SHARMA 7. GUDRIYA KUMARI SHARMA, All are minor daughter of late Hanuman Sharma under the guardianship of Mostt. Shanti Sharma, resident of Sharma Hotel Mohalla, P.O. Motihari, P.S. Chhatauni, District – East Champaran. …. Plaintiffs/Opposite 8. BHUNESHWAR SHARMA, Son of Ramkishan Sharma, resident of village - Mathiya Jirat, P.O.- Motihari, P.S. – Chhatauni, District – East Champaran. ….. Defendant 1st / Opposite Party 2nd set. 9. SMT. PHULVATI DEVI, Wife of Shardaram Sharma 10. SMT. RAMKALI DEVI, Wife of Bali Raut 11. BABURAM RAUT, Son of late Bishwanath, All are resident of village – Mathiya jirat, P.O. Motihari, P.S. Chhatauni, District – East Champaran. …. Defendants 2nd Set/Opposite Parties 3rd set. 12. AJAY KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, Son of Kailash Prasad, resident of village – Chhatauni, P.O.- Motihari, P.S. Motihari, District – East Champaran. …. Defendant 3rd set/opposite party 4th set. ----------- 05/ 11.05.2009 Heard both the sides. I have gone through the impugned order as also the connected annexures on the basis of which the amendment was allowed by the learned Subordinate Judge, IVth, Motihari in Title (Partition) Suit No. 181 of 1997 and I do not see any material irregularity much less any illegality in allowing the impugned amendment in the plaint. In the - 2 - above light, the revision petition appears meritless and the same is dismissed. It goes without saying that the petitioners have anything to place before the court below through any written statement or through any pleadings, they shall be free to do it. The learned counsel for the petitioners as also the learned counsel for the O.Ps. have undertaken to cooperate with the learned trial Court and the learned Court in case of getting cooperation from the petitioners shall dispose of the Partition Suit in a period of one year from the date he receives a copy of the present order. DKS/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)