IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 27TH AUGUST 2009 / 5TH BHADRA 1931 RP.No. 826 of 2009(O) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.5470/2009 Dated 20/07/2009 OS.186/2004 of MUNSIFF COURT, PEERUMEDU .................... REVIEW PETITIONER: PETITIONER: --------------------------------- AUGUSTHY JOSEPH, S/O.VARKEY JOSEPH, KAVETTU VEEDU, KOTHAPARA, UPPUTHARA. BY ADV. SRI.T.I.ABDUL SALAM RESPONDENT: RESPONDENT: -------------------------- PAUL THOMAS, S/O.A.T.THOMAS, EARATHU VEEDU, UPPUTHARA P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.S. SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P.No.826 of 2009 in W.P.(C) No.5470 of 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated: 27th August, 2009 ORDER This petition is filed to review the judgment dated 20.7.2009 passed in W.P.C.No.5470 of 2009. The above Writ Petition filed by the petitioner challenging an order passed by the execution court issuing warrant against him, negativing his plea of no means, was dismissed. The Review Petition is filed advancing a case that there is an apparent error on the face of the judgment, i.e., whether he was able to pay decree debt even if he had income was not considered by this court. 2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. I find no merit in the review petition. A plea of no means satisfaction of which alone would entitle a judgment debtor from arrest in execution of a decree for money cannot be equated with reference to the sufficiency of his means to pay the whole decree debt covered by the execution. He has obtained one half right over one acre of immovable property on the death of his father was proved by the materials tendered in the case. The execution court, thereupon, found he has means to pay the decree debt and the challenge against that order by way of Writ RP No. 826/09 - 2 - Petition was also found meritless. Review sought of the judgment rendered in the Writ Petition lacks merit, and it is dismissed. srd S.S. SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE