IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.3044 OF 2005 PETITION NO.3044 OF 2005 PETITION NO.3044 OF 2005 M/s. Alyamama Enterprises & Anr ... Petitioners V/s. The Union of India & Anr. ... Respondents Mr. Prakash Ganwani i/b. Munir Merchant for the petitioners. Ms. Ritu Singh with A.S. Rao for the respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 22nd September, 2006 : 22nd September, 2006 : 22nd September, 2006 P.C. . The petitioners’ application for renewal has not been considered. In other words, the authorities have refused to renew the certificate. Once that be the position, there is statutory appeal available under Section 23(1)(a) of the Emigration Act, 1983. Once the petitioner has altenate and efficacious remedy available, this Court ought not to exercise its extra-ordinary jurisdiction and hence petition is disposed of. 2. Certified copy expediated. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]