BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty First day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.12282 of 2011 KUMARESAN : PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.3 Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARAVAKURICHI POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT. CRIME NO.384/2009 : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. A.K.BASKARAPANDIAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr. A.RAMAR Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused No.3 apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147,120(B),342,364(A),406,465,468 and 506(i) IPC in Crime No.384 of 2009 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner apprehending arrest in Crime No.384 of 2009 registered under Sections 147,120(B),342,364(A),406,465,468 and 506(i) IPC. He further submits that originally the case has been registered by the District Crime Branch, Karur in Crime No.23 of 2008 and subsequently it was transferred to the present respondent in Crime No.384 of 2009 and at the time of obtaining anticipatory bail the provisions of law have been wrongly mentioned and hence he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the petitioner/A3 is the only attestor of the document and he is also to assist for execution of sale deed and the investigation is going on https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ hence, he prays for dismissal of petition. He fairly conceded that already the petitioner was obtained anticipatory bail before this Court. 4. Considering the same, and perusal of documents since the provisions of law have been wrongly stated and even though the petitioner was not arrested, he has neither interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Karur, and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Karur and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. Sd/- 21/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.2, KARUR. 2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KARUR DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARAVAKURICHI POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT. +1 CC to M/S. A.K.BASKARAPANDIAN Advocate SR.No.32429 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12282 of 2011 NSV/22.9.11/2P/6C Date :21/09/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/