IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.122 of 2010 1. TRILOKI SINGH S/O LATE MATUKI SINGH R/O VILL TENDUNI , P.O.& P.S.BIKRAMGANJ,DISTT-ROHTAS 2. RAGHUNI SINGH S/O LATE BHIKHARI SINGH R/O VILL TENDUNI , P.O.& P.S.BIKRAMGANJ,DISTT-ROHTAS. …………….Respondents/Appellants. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. CHAIRMAN , NOTIFIED AREA COMMITTEE BIKRAMGANJ, DISTT-ROHTAS 3. SRI LAXSHMI PRASAD CHAUHAN, SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE-CUM-CHAIRMAN NOTIFIED AREA COMMITTEE, BIKRAMGANJ 4. SRI ANIRUDH PRASAD , LAND REFORMS DEPUTY COLLECTOR BIKRAMGANJ,DISTT-ROHTAS 5. DR. SHASHI BHUSAN PRASAD SINGH S/O NOT KNOWN AT P.O.& P.S.BIKRAMGANJ, DISTT-ROHTAS. …………….Respondents/Respondents Ist Set. 6. SRI BHAGWAN SINGH S/O LATE DHAN KUMAR SINGH R/O VILL TENDUNI (BIKRAMGANJ), P.O.& P.S.BIKRAMGANJ,DISTT-ROHTAS 7. GANESH SINGH S/O LATE DHAN KUMAR SINGH R/O VILL TENDUNI (BIKRAMGANJ), P.O.& P.S.BIKRAMGANJ,DISTT-ROHTAS 8. SRI NIWAS SINGH S/O LATE DHAN KUMAR SINGH R/O VILL TENDUNI (BIKRAMGANJ), P.O.& P.S.BIKRAMGANJ,DISTT-ROHTAS 9. RAJENDRA PRASAD SINGH S/O LATE DHAN KUMAR SINGH R/O VILL TENDUNI (BIKRAMGANJ), P.O.& P.S.BIKRAMGANJ,DISTT-ROHTAS 10. LAL BIHARI SINGH S/O LATE DHAN KUMAR SINGH R/O VILL TENDUNI (BIKRAMGANJ), P.O.& P.S.BIKRAMGANJ,DISTT-ROHTAS. …………….Petitioners/Respondents 2nd set. ----------- 5 24.03.2011 The present L.P.A. has been filed against the order dated 20.11.2009 passed in C.W.J.C. No.11984 of 2001. Respondent nos. 6 and 7 of the writ petition are the appellants herein. Respondent nos. 6 to 10 herein had filed the writ petition for quashing the entire proceeding in Case No. 3/89-99 including the order dated 31st August, 2001 passed by the Chairman, Notified Area Committee, Bikramganj and also for issuance of a writ against the respondents and their subordinates, agents and associates for restraining them to interfere in their exclusive right, title and possession over the land in question covered by the decree of Civil Court in their favour. 2 The learned Single Judge having heard the parties and after going through the materials on records has held that the decree passed in Title Suit No. 439 of 1989 by the Court of Munsif, Bikramgan at Sasaram has become final and no one, much less any Municipal authorities can override the same. Having held so the learned Judge has further observed that there is also no power conferred on the Municipal Authority to pass an order which will have the effect of over reaching the judgment and decree of the Civil Court. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants, however has submitted before us that the learned Single Judge has committed an error in allowing the writ petition on the basis of the decree passed in Title Suit No.439 of 1989 which does not cover the land in dispute inform of a common passage. There is absolutely nothing on record nor any material has been produced in support of the above contention by the learned Counsel for the Appellant and thus this Court cannot accept his bald submissions. Under the above circumstance, we are of the opinion that the order passed by the learned Single Judge needs no interference. Accordingly, this L.P.A. stands dismissed. Abhay Kumar ( T. Meena Kumari, J.) (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)