WP(C) 1509/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. G.P. Bhowmik, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as M r. D.K. Dey, learned SC, Raiway. The petitioners claiming themselves to be the Commission Vendors operati ng/running tea stalls/pan dalas etc. from their units at New Tinsukia Railway St ation Platform, filed this writ petition for a direction to the respondents to a bsorb their sons/wards/helpers who are engaged in their said business against Gr oup -D posts of Railways. Merely because the petitioners were engaged in the aforesaid business in the Railway Station, they cannot claim that their sons/wards/helper should be a bsorbed in Group-D posts. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the said prayer was made under the earlier policy decision of the Govt. On the other hand, learned SC, Railway referring to the stand in the counter affidavit, subm its that the policy decision was taken for extension of certain relaxation to Co mmisison Vendors only. The petitioners could not be absorbed as they crossed the age limit. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition was fi led claiming the aforesaid relief on the basis of the earlier policy decision of the Railway and presently the petitioners are only interested in getting licenc e to run their business. He seeks to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty t o file a fresh writ petition on that count. The prayer is allowed with the liberty. The writ petition is dismissed. Interim order passed earlier stands vacated.