1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (LODGING) NO. 30 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1229 OF 2003 Tarun Kumar Banerjee ...Petitioner Versus Bharat Aluminium Co. Ltd. & Anr. ...Respondents. Mr. Girish Agrawal for the Petitioner as amicus curiae Mr. D.H. Mehta i/by M/s. Purohit & Co. for Respondent No.1 Mr. D.A. Dube for Respondent No. 2. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and A.A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. DATE : JULY 28, 2008 P.C.:- This is a petition for review. 2. When this petition was filed last time by the party-in-person, we found that it would be fair to him to request a counsel to appear for him, as he stated that he was not in a position to engage a counsel. 3. The counsel has appeared, and submits that a private limited company was held to be amenable to the Writ Jurisdiction of this Court 2 by the judgment of this Court in Satish Prabhakar Padhye v. Union of India & Ors., reported in 2006 I CLR 455. But this judgment has been stayed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, and in a subsequent judgment in Fancy Rehabilitation Trust & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors., reported in 2007 (1) Bom.C.R. 112, this High Court referred to this Judgment and observed that the judgment was per incuriam. In this factual matrix, review would not lie, and Review Petition is dismissed. BILAL NAZKI, J. A.A. KUMBHAKONI, J.