IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR {CG) WRIT PETITION N0.4^ > 3 /2004 PETITIONER ^.., ^ c^y< -..-•""A.^'-"F.^' l-y'v ^^ysy ^^"...^ ^v" Purushottam Agrawal, aged about years, son of Shri Maturam Agrawal, R/o. Ggtndhi Ganj Raigarh, District - Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^^ 3T ^^'l^. f '^""" /' 1\ - VA"';^ •.'&// ^ ^•:-^^"^' :a-. s <' a^ -?*^ Municipal Corporation, Raigarh, through: Comraissioner Municipal Corporation. Tax Recovery Officer, Municipal Corporation, Raigarh, (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. ORDER OR ORDERS 7.-.- r-;;^;- "^{.. XI-HC-22 SD^T'SEI Pt-fi.'* anlsi wfw^ w^ i)-,..^-£-_ ^BT-^raRPI. riTftti'ld, fawi*<1< _.^.:.e.:.M.o...(±.s,£^J0^ "WT. 200 WHWI g»*ii^i Iq^^T' 311^1's^iIWdf?^ On a mention being made, ti~[i Shri S.C. Verma, counsel for| Shri Prashant Mishra, Addl. Learned counsel for the pe petition to counsel for the respondeji The petitioner has preferr^; 226/227 of the Constitution of Ind) respondents be directed to issue Nc) Leamed counse! for the petij back as on 16.09,2004 ancl thereafl before respondent No. I- Municipal| Certificate, In response to those letter dated 24.11.2004. Counsel i|i petitioner has given reply to the| respondent No. 1 - Municipal issuing No Dues Certificate to the d the respondents be directed to c| appropriate order, to which counsel Having heard leai-ned couns4 lacta ancl circumstances of the directed to decide the applicaticj appropriate order in accordance w: the documents, if any, filed by the f| In view of this order, I.A,No.9| With the above directions, th( Certified copy today. matter is taken up for hearing. |the petitioner. ^dv. General, for the respondents. ;itioner to supply extra copy of the ^>Hld4l'1 ^IWdf ^ 'f^st' <^'^i< ^?3iP(n .sn^i ^d this Writ petition under Article a, whereby he has requested that the Dues Certificate to the petitioner. -ioner submifs that rhe petitioner as ;r on 22.11.2004 moved applications |Corporation for issuance of No Dues itters Municipa' Corporation gave a jurther submits that even though the letter-dated 24.11.2004, even then Coijporation is neither giving reply nor [etitioner. Therefore, he submits that |ecide his application and pass an for respondents has no objection. P for the pai~ties, having regard to the c|ase, the respondent Corporation is |n of the petitioner and pass an jth law today itself, after considerinj letitioner. fllOS/2004 stands disposed of. petition is disposed of. -^?- .-^'y sffl- L.C. Bhadoo .iudge [^ ^fo^