IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC (T) No. 376 of 2008. Decided on: 29th October, 2010. Tara Chand Sharma. ….Petitioner. -Versus- O.P. Sharma and others. ….Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : None. For respondents No. 1 and 3. : Mr. P. M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For respondent No. 2. : Ms. Madhu Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): The Original Application No. 2474 of 2007 (CWP(T) No. 15684 of 2008) has been decided in favour of the petitioner on 14th December, 2009. Consequently, the present petition is rendered infructuous. 2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, if the judgment dated 14th December, 2009, rendered in CWP(T) No. 15684 of 2008 is not implemented, the petitioner is at liberty to take appropriate remedy in accordance with law before the appropriate Forum. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge October 29, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?