IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12837 of 2010 1. DEVENDRA JHA S/O LATE UMAKANT JHA R/O BINODANAND JHA COLONY, WARD NO.7, TOWN, P.S. AND DISTT.- MADHUBANI .......Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE MADHUBANI NAGAR PARISHAD (MUNICIPALITY) MADHUBANI, THROUGH ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 3. THE CHAIRMAN, NAGAR PARISHAD, MADHUBANI 4. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, MADHUBANI NAGAR PARISHAD MADHUBANI 5. THE ENGINEER, MADHUBANI NAGAR PARISHAD, MADHUBANI 6. MR. JATASHANKAR JHA, JUNIOR ENGINEER MADHUBANI NAGAR PARISHAD, MADHUBANI ----------- 7 03-01-2011 Herd learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State, learned counsel for the Madhubani Nagar Parishad and learned counsel for respondent no.6, a Junior Engineer in Madhubani Nagar Parishad. At the instance of another person some directions were issued in a writ petition under public interest litigation. The canal in question was cleaned in the urban area of Madhubani. The petitioner wants further measures to be taken for improving drainage system in Madhubani town and also wants issuance of a writ of quo warranto restraining the Junior Engineer from functioning as Nagar Parishad Engineer. It has come on record that petitioner was earlier a registered contractor with the Madhubani Nagar 2 Parishad but subsequently the registration has not been renewed. Apparently, he has personal grievance against the authority concerned. This fact should have been disclosed in the writ petition itself. In the aforesaid circumstances and considering that a prayer for issuance of writ of quo warranto has been made in public interest litigation, we are not persuaded to interfere. The writ petition is dismissed. It goes without saying that the Nagar Parishad, Madhubani is supposed to act in the best interest of people in accordance with law. BKS/- (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)