IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10089 of 2011 VISHUNDEO RAJAK AND ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2. 25.03.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 420, 323 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that in spite of the instructions of the University and the Government to make payment of salary with regard to the persons who are working on the sanctioned post but the salary has also been paid to the persons by taking illegal gratification who are not working on the sanctioned post. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that subsequently the complainant has retracted from his initial version and filed a petition to that effect before the learned court below. Considering the general nature of accusation by a class IV employee against 2 the petitioners, let the petitioners, Vishnudeo Rajak and Dhirendra Kumar Singh, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no.523(C) of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M. Hilsa, Nalanda, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)