1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER SB Cr Misc Bail Application No. 7161/2010 Vijay Singh Vs State of Rajasthan 4.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Gaurav Gupta - for the petitioner Mr Paresh Chaudahry - Public Prosecutor BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the matter for offence under section 379 IPC apart from other offences. The offence under section 379 IPC is not found during course of investigation. Petitioner has also received injuries. Looking to the aforesaid, petitioner may be granted anticipatory bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. After taking into consideration rival submissions of 2 the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect the outcome of the trial, but looking to the facts of this case, I allow bail application of petitioner under section 438 CrPC. Therefore, the SHO/IO of the Police Station – Behror, Alwar is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner Vijay Singh in FIR No. 318/2010 registered for offence under Section/s 143, 332, 353 and 379 IPC, he shall enlarge him on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i)He shall make himself available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required; (ii)He shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; (iii)He shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (iv)He shall not commit same and similar offence during the period of bail. (MN Bhandari), J. bnsharma