1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 1263/2009 Vijay s/o Laxmanrao Thaware, Aged 47 years, Occp. Business, R/o Arjuni Morgaon, Dist. Gondia. PETITIONER VERSUS Indian Oil Corporation Limited, through its chief Area Manager Indane Area Office, First Floor, Akarshan, Bijiplex, 26, Central Bazar Road, Ramdaspeth, Nagpur-10. RESPONDENTS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. B.G. Kulkarni, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. S.V. Purohit, counsel for the R-1. CORAM : S.A. BOBDE AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 5, 2010. In this petition, the petitioner has challenged his evaluation done by the Indian Oil Corporation for the purpose of grant of distributorship of Indane Gas. Shri Kulkarni, the learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly accepted the position that even if the marks are granted to the petitioner as claim by him, still he will not be entitled for grant of distributorship since he would be at Serial Number 2 of the merit list of the candidates, who are evaluated. 2 This provides no assistance to the case of the petitioner since we have, in Writ Petition No.2837 of 2009, decided on 5th of January, 2009, already confirmed the grant of distributorship to the respondent no.2 therein, who was at Serial Number 1. There is no merit in the petition, the same is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE APTE