1 2632.11 SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2632 OF 2011 Pradip Balkrishna Gawade & Anr. ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.V.M.Parkar for Petitioners. Mrs.S.S.Bhende, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND R.Y.GANOO, JJ. DATED:- JUNE 27, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. The primary grievance of the petitioners is that the representation made by them to the respondents, in particular, respondent No.2 has remained undecided. According to the petitioners, as per the communication sent by respondent No.3 dated 4th July, 2007 (Exhibit `B’) addressed to the Commissioner and Director, Municipal Administration, the petitioners are entitled for approval as referred to therein. However, the respondent No.2 has not taken any decision in that behalf so far. 2 2632.11 3. In the circumstances, we dispose of this Petition by directing the respondent No.2 to examine the representation submitted by the petitioners along with the communication dated 4th July, 2007 sent by respondent No.3 on its own merits in accordance with law. If some decision is already taken on the said representation, the respondent No.2 is free to communicate the same to the petitioners forthwith. 4. We once again make it clear that we are not expressing any opinion on the merits of the grievance made by the petitioners in this Petition. All questions are left open to be decided by respondent No.2. We, however, hope and trust that the respondent No.2 shall take appropriate decision expeditiously by providing due opportunity to the petitioners. The final decision be communicated to the petitioners not later than 31st August, 2011. 5. Petition disposed of on the above terms. (R.Y.GANOO, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)