IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8456 of 2009 MUKESH YADAV, son of Lakhan Yadav resident of village-Ranhan, P.S.Sikandra, District-Jamui------------Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 9.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that though he along with others has been alleged for demanding rangdari and snatching of Rs.2,000/- but reality was that petitioner was objecting cutting crops from his field and he was not involved either in demand or snatching, so chargesheet was submitted against others finding petitioner’s allegation false. But cognizance is taken and petitioner is apprehending his arrest which, in my view, is also not justified. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Sikandra P.S. case no.190 of 2006, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-( Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri R. Chaubey, J. M. Ist Class, Jamui , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )