IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.33222 of 2011 Madan Sahni Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 28.09.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in which on protest the cognizance has been taken under Sections 304B, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that during investigation the accusation was found false and the victim died due to diarrhoea when the final form was submitted as a mistake of fact on 05.12.2007 and protest was filed on 12.12.2007. It appears that for occurrence of 17.09.2007 the F.I.R. was lodged on 02.10.2007. It is further submitted that out of wedlock there is a male child who is still residing with the petitioner. Considering the fact that accusation was found false during investigation, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. C1-1017 2 of 2008 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Sitamarhi Sadar, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if the petitioner defaults for three consecutive occasions during trial. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)