IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 22482 of 2011 Pinku Paswan @ Pintu Paswan, S/o Dilip Paswan. Versus The State of Bihar ----------------- 03. 21.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the looted mobile was recovered from the possession of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge if his case is not bifurcated for purposes of commitment or charge. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)