$?3 ‘ a\ “16% 1mm aim '$ .. ........... P L5) we wow/08 ..... '.. 111200 PETITIONER Ramas ankar Awasthj, S/o Chandrika Prasad Awas aged about 45 years, Peon, Govenxiu’mnt Girls Higher Secondaxy School, 1 Chhal, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG) Versus RESPONDENTS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through Secnrtary, Department of Tribal and Wclfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) Connm'ssioner, Tribal Welfam Deparunent, Raip'lr, Distt. Raipur (CG) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfam Depa rtment, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG) The (Zonector Raigarh, DiStt. Rajgarh (CG) Bhee"mraj Yadav, Peon, Govermpent H§gher h Secondaly School, kudekela, D1stt. Ralgarh (CG)‘ WRIT PETITION UNDER TICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: HON. SHRI DHIREND MISHRA, J 19- 1 1-2008 Sbri Gautam Khetrapal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Smt. Smita Ghai, Pan :1 Lawyer, for the State. Grievance of the working as daily wager peo for last more than 10 yeaxs, remained absent hum 2-11-2002 to 3—1-2007 from duty and he was allowed 11-200‘2 to 13-1-2007 on the basis of by him before the concerned authority vide Annexum P-'2. Leaned counsel for No. 3 vide onler of Annex #7, Vi IQ '33 k01-- 'tioner is that the petitioner, who is to join after absence hem medical certificate produc petitioner submits that the respondent P-5 datedi‘9-9—2008, regularized all i #i‘_ cw M . - e mammaiw) mwmféar'm amméstm ' ’ ‘ mmmma WW#MW y $Wanésr WWWW w HS) ND 6””29/09 mmma; 1F: zoo 31m w (1m) mmw anéa mam?!W mmm#%€tm ammmm'ai avmmst Class 4 contingency paid employees working in various department 1s per circular of Annex'ure P—4 dated 5- the petitioner for regularization has not that he is not pressing fhis petition at for liberty to the petitioner to me n‘esh lepresentation before the r pondent No. 3 for his Iegularization, who, in tum, be further d‘ specined period as per circ Learned counsel for makes a fresh representatio: considered and decided with; receipt of the representation. iions made by learned counsel forthe >sed of with liberty to the petitioner to arization along with a copy of this order a between 1-1-89 to 31-12-97 : 3-2008, however the case of been considered. He submits this stage, however he prays ted to decide his representation within of Annexure P-4. e State submits that if the petitioner i for regularization, the same shall be n a period of 6 weeks hom the date of In View of the submis: parties, this petition is disp( make representation for reguJ Within 15 days before th respondent No. 3, and on such representation being made, the same shall be considered and decided by the concerned authority ithin a period of 6 weeks from the date n on its own merit in accordance with I Sdl- i Ia Dhirendra Mishra Judge of receipt of the representati law. I