[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.127 OF 2006 IN CRI.REVISION APPLICATION NO.218 OF 2002 Smt.Sarswati Chandrakant Choughule ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.Gaurav Parkar for Mr.Prashant Badole advocate for applicant Mr.A.R.Patil A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : DECEMBER 5, 2007 DATE : DECEMBER 5, 2007 DATE : DECEMBER 5, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Mr.Chandrakant Gopal Chougule was convicted under Section 509 read with Section 109 of IPC. The appeal preferred by him, came to be dismissed. Hence, he preferred Criminal Revision Application No. 218 of 2002 which has been admitted and is pending hearing before this Court. During the pendency of the revision, Mr.Chandrakant Chougule expired, hence, present application has been preferred by his widow Smt.Saraswati Chougule to [-2-] allow her to proceed with the Revision Application No. 218 of 2002. It is stated that on account of conviction of her husband, the provident fund due to her, has been withheld. The learned APP states that there is no objection to the prayer (b) being granted. In this view of the matter, this application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b) viz:- . (b) Leave may be grnated by this Honourable Court to continue her to proceed with the Criminal Revision Application No. 218 of 2002 pending in this Honourable High Court, Mumbai. 3. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]