IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. 570-M of 2008 Dated of decision : January 10, 2008 Veena Rani and another .....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents *** CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL **** Present: Mr.Manish Prabhaker, Advocate for the petitioners. RAJESH BINDAL, J. This is a petition for direction to respondents No. 1 to 3 to register an FIR against respondents No. 4 to 11 under Sections 326, 327, 324, 323, 452 and 120-B IPC. Notice of motion to respondents No. l to 3. Mr. Anter Singh Brar, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, who is present in Court accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3 and states that the present petition is not maintainable in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. And others 2008 (1) RCR (Criminal) 392. In view of the above, the present petition is not maintainable as the petitioners have alternative remedy under Section 156 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petition is dismissed. January 10, 2008 (Rajesh Bindal) Pka Judge