IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T)No.13927 of 2008. Date of decision: 4.1.2011 Sher Singh …. Petitioner Versus State of H.P & anr. .... Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, J. Whether approved for reporting ? No For the petitioner: Mr.B.N.Mehta, Advocate. For the respondents: Sh.Vivek Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General. Deepak Gupta, J.(Oral) The main grievance of the petitioner who was working as monument attendant is that there are no promotional avenues available for this post. The State in its reply has pointed out that monument attendants are also Class-IV employees and thus are included in the category of Class IV employees who are entitled to promotion to Class-III under 10% quota. Therefore, the petitioner has an avenue of promotion being a class IV employee. 2 The petition is disposed of in view of the reply filed by the State. No order as to costs. January 4, 2011 (m) ( Deepak Gupta ) Judge