Civil Revision No.2833 of 2009 -: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.2833 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: August 18, 2009. Sube Singh & Ors. ...Petitioner(s) v. Rajinder Parsad & Ors. ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. Bedi 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri Virender Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners. ORDER M.M.S. Bedi , J. - (Oral): The petitioners challenge the order dated 31.10.2006 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Karnal, as well as the order dated 4.3.2009 passed by the Additional District Judge, Karnal declining interim injunction to the petitioner-plaintiffs on the ground that the petitioner- plaintiffs do not have a prima-facie a good case in their favour as the decree passed by the Additional District Judge, Karnal has attained finality uptil the Apex Court and the plaintiff-petitioners have claimed themselves to be owners in possession on the basis of a registered sale deed. It has been observed that respondents No.1 to 5 cannot be restrained from taking recourse to any legal remedy available to them by filing execution petition Civil Revision No.2833 of 2009 -: 2 :- to seek possession on the basis of judgment and decree in their favour. No ground for interference is made out. Dismissed. August 18, 2009. [ M.M.S. Bedi ] kadyan Judge