IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.5795 of 2011 Ramjee Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar -------- 04/ 09.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named in the first information report and the informant claims himself to be eye-witness of the alleged occurrence but learned counsel for the petitioner submits that para 1 of the case diary reveals that the Investigating officer reached at the place of the occurrence having got information about the alleged occurrence and after that deceased was taken to hospital but at the place of the occurrence neither informant nor any person disclosed name of the petitioner. It is further contended by him that, as a matter of fact, petitioner’s son was kidnapped by the deceased and other accused for which petitioner lodged Ara Town P.S. Case no. 401/2010 and that is the reason of false implication of the petitioner in the alleged crime. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Ramjee Yadav, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in Ara Town P.S. Case no. 402/2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)