Page N®, cv-\^> IN THEHIGHCOURT^>FLCHIIATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER W^ P.JSIJfo. 4^'.S3 / 2006 Dev Sharan Tandiya, ^ ,rs S/o Late Shri Bhagiral.hiTandiya, >:^ . . . „ ' ,•• ^~> ii^ed aboul 63 yciii'H, **" ^5 r ' S0^-"'^.' ^.••' . Retired Lecturer, Tribal Department, . ..-•"^'l..y ^^^' Government Boys Higher Secondaiy School, Keshkal, District - Bastar, (C.G.). <^^ 'y RfiSFQNPENTS VERSUS _.^ ^^ 1. Sia.teofChhattisl.irh,. '• Through : The Secretaiy, Tribal Development Department, D.K.S. Uliawaii, Kaipur, (C.O.). 2. The Commissioner, Schedule Tribe. and Schedule Caste Development, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, (C.G.). 3. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal,' Development, Jagdalpur, District - Bastar, (C.O.) 4. The Principal, Government Buys / Higher Secondary School, Keshkal, District - Bastar, (C.G.) ;>. 't'lie Divii'iiiinal jfiiiil l)ii'';(:lor, fun.c!,/ Account and pension, Bastar at Jagdalpur Distt. Bastar, C.G. 6. The District Treasury officer, - Jagdalpur Distt. Bastar, C.G. y WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 3^'':?raTrP, ®Tfl'H'i6,Rrtitfy <41^Mlsb^icb .^..^0»^5.'^3. 3n^?r Tsra? (i^it^ai^sr) ^ 200^ sn^Twf^ira; (WTSfT^rshHlti ^BTWfff^TSn^T Pundaihental tl|»e aibd 29-8-2006 Shrl Subhash Yadav, Shrl Vlnay Pandey, on advan^e copy. Hesrd. The case of the pet^ promoted from the p®st of order dated 20th Septembeij- Trlbal Development, Madhy4 lon the said post on 20th of Ruie 22-D of the benefit of 2 I.ne.rements Rs.1640-60-2600-75-2900 Ident No.l vide Annexure-P/f petltioner, respondent N04 has erdered for recovery lllegal. Learned eounsel for the sald recovery has beetji not.ice to the petltloner glving any epportunity to in the circumstances, subm.i.tted that the peti representation to Idedde thesame, to which no objection. Having heard leanned regard tothe facts and |e^>res sj.ng any op.i.nion on ioner 1s allowed to make _wl.th a copy o£ th.ls wrlt counsel for the petitloner. '.L. for the State/respondents, .ti.oner 1s that the petltioner was Head Master to the Lecturer vide 1994 passed by the Commissioner, Pradesh and the petitioner jolned 0<J!tober, 94. By givj.ng the benef.tt lead-ned tltfrner respond^nt wsifeftT wiRf)''ff te^)'^RZR ^aTf^irsn^T R-ales and by giving the petitioner'spay was fixed at Sanction was issued by respon- Ifl. Now, after retlrement of the 5 after scrutinizlng the matter <|>£ Rs.60.918/-, whj.ch is totally the petitioner submitted that effected wlthout glvlng any ^sking him to explain o* without expla-ln the position. I'herefore, counsel for the petltloner may be allowed to make a No. 5 and he be d.1rected to counsel forrespondents has l^arned 4ounsel for the psrties, having .il-eumstances of the case and without (he meriSs of the case, the petlt- detailed representatj.on along ^etit-Lon & Its annexures to P.T.O. ^l XI-HC-78 3xcT^nqR;pr, »Tfl+iii<B, Ricii^y HW^I St»*11<h ^ 200 Sii^i Macn ('i?i'3cl<<.^) 3T1^T^rf?:IR; (raTsn^T^iiR; ^t^ V- ?TaraT(ri??r3ii^r " respondent No.5 wj.thJ.n a raisl.ng all his grievances shall et<ssS±S decide the re after considering all the after glvlng opportunity within a period of 2 mont the representation, .tb acc the effect and operation remain stayed. With the direction disposed of. Consequently, M.('W disposed of. C.C. as per Rules. tiiifa'fl't tiiiciT^'tec3'<Rit<i< iisrf^iTsn^T period of 15 days from today, and In turn, respondent No.5 presentation o£ the petitioner points raised by the petltioner, s£ hearing to the petitioner, hs from the date of recelpt of srdance with law. Till.then, 3f the orderAnnexure/P/2 shall aforesaid, tte petltion stands . )P. No.3503/2006 also stands Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge '^1