SINGLE BENCH In the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur WP (S) - W / 2011 x Petitioner Ramkishor Chandrakar, Aged 52 Yrs. S/ o Late Jhamman Lal Chandrakar PO Ravigram (Telibandha) Vill. Amlidih, Raipur CG Versus . Respondents 1/State of Chhattisgarh, thro’ Secretary, Deptt. Of Agriculture, Mantralaya, Rai’pur. WM 27Managing Director, \W Chhattisgarh Rajya Krishi Vipmm / Board,Raipur. é x «§:9§.a’. 3. Deputy Commissioner cum Census Charge Officer, Nagar Palika Nigam, Raipur I Petition Under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BXLASPUR $ WRIT PETITION (S) No. 481 01‘2011 PE'I‘ITIONER Ramkishor Chandrakar VERSUS RESPONDENTS Sta‘w of Chlmttisgarh & Others‘ SB: Hon’bie Shri Satish Ix Agnihotri. J. Prasem: Shri Raja Shanna. Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivcdi, Deputy Government Advocata for the State/respondent No. 1. y Shri Vikrant Singh. Advocate for the respondent No. 2. ORDER (ORAL) (Passsd on 12“ day ofMay, 2011) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue oftransibr, involved in this petition. has come to an end on account ofthe fact that census work is over. Thus. nothing survives in this petition for mijudication. However, the petitioner wishes to make a representation to the respondent authorities for other consequential benefits. Learned counsel appearing for other side have no objection. 3. Since there is no prayer for grant ofconsequential benefits in the petition: it is not necessary to grant any permission to make a representation. If the petitioner wants to make a representation. he is free to do so. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation. ifso advised. Sd/-' K. Agnihotri Satish Judge