IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15382 of 2005 SUSHIL KUMAR PATHAK Versus THE REG.P.F.COMMISSIONER &ORS ----------- 4/ 17.05.2010 Mr. Naresh Dass for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Employees Provident Fund Organization are present. The petitioner an employee of the Bharat Wagon and Engineering Company Limited, submitted his resignation under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme and which was accepted with effect from 31.5.2002. The petitioner complains of incorrect fixation of his pension under the provisions of the Employees Pension Scheme, 1995. It is stated in the writ petition that though the petitioner was entitled to a pension of Rs. 1143/- per month, the respondents had fixed the same at Rs. 739/- per month and which was not in accordance with the Scheme. The petitioner also complains that the name of wife and children has not been entered in the records, as nominee(s)/legal heirs to family pension. Mr. Alok Kumar, learned junior counsel to Mr. Rajiv Kumar Singh, with reference to revised pension payment order dated 30.5.2006, submits that the grievance of the petitioner had been examined and a revised pension payment order was issued fixing the pension of the petitioner at Rs. 761- per month and a differential amount of 2 Rs. 1056/- was paid to the petitioner. He thus submits that the grievance of the petitioner, upon examination, stands redressed. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, the writ petition is disposed of, with direction for ensuring the inclusion of the name of the nominee/legal heirs in the records for the purpose of family pension. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)