THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 25149 of 2008 ORDER: This writ petition has been ﬁled by the petitioners, who are seven in number, assailing the action of the respondents in rejecting their building permission applications on the ground of pendency of L.G.C.No.29 of 2006 filed by the Government. The petitioners claim to have purchased house plots from M/s. Matrusri Cooperative House Building Society Limited. They submitted applications to respondents 1 and 2 for sanction of building permission. Their applications came to be rejected on the ground of pendency of L.G.C.No.29 of 2006. The rejection orders passed by the first respondent are under challenge in this writ petition. When the writ petition came up for admission, Sri A. Kalpana Ekbote, learned Standing Counsel of Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation received notice on behalf of respondents 1 and 2. Sri M. Dhananjaya Reddy, learned Standing Counsel of Hyderabad Urban Development Authority received notice on behalf of respondent No.4. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel of Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation appearing for respondents 1 and 2 and the learned Standing Counsel of Hyderabad Urban Development Authority appearing for respondent No.4. The issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the judgments of this Court in W.P.No.1833 of 2008 between J. V. Ramapathi Rao and ors. V. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep. by its Deputy Commissioner, Serilingampally, Hyderabad and others, W.P.No.6974 of 2008 between Khaja Moinudding Khan and ors. V. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep. by its Deputy Commissioner, Serilingampally, Hyderabad and others, W.P.No.14237 of 2008 between Smt. V. Jyothi and anr. V. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep. by its Deputy Commissioner, Serilingampally, Hyderabad and others, W.P.No.18761 of 2008 between L. Sudhakar and ors. V. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep. by its Deputy Commissioner, Serilingampally, Hyderabad and others, and W.P.No.18973 of 2008 between Smt. Dr. Sushma v. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep. by its Deputy Commissioner, Serilingampally, Hyderabad and others. When the purchasers of plots from the M/s. Matrusri Cooperative House Building Society Limited approached this Court in the above writ petitions challenging the action of the respondents in rejecting their building permission applications, this Court disposed of the above referred writ petitions directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the building permission applications in accordance with the provisions of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act and the Rules made thereunder, without taking into consideration the pendency of L.G.C. said to have been filed by the Government. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage directing respondents 1 and 2 to consider the building permission applications submitted by the petitioners in accordance with the provisions of the Hyderabad Munciipal Corporation Act and the Rules made thereunder. _________________________ (B. Seshasayana Reddy, J.) 15th November, 2008 Note: C.C. in 3 days (B/o) Js.