IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21832 of 2011 ASHISH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, S/O LATE SHAMBHU NATH SAHAY, R/O MOHALLA: LALA BABU ROAD, NEW GODOWN, P.S.- KOTWALI, DISTRICT- GAYA ………….Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SUPRITA KRISHNA, D/O SUNIL KUMAR VERMA, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT VILLAGE- MAHINAGAR, IN FRONT OF SATSANG TEMPLE, KRISHNAPURI, MADHUBANI, P.S- K. HAT, DISTRICT- PURNEA …………..Opposite Parties ----------- 2. 12.07.2011 This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 30.5.2011 in Complaint Case No. 2377 of 2009 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Purnea, in Cr. Misc. No. 47 of 2011, by which the prayer of the petitioner for modification of the earlier order dated 6.12.2010 has been dismissed. By the said order dated 6.12.2010, the petitioner was directed to go to the complainant’s father’s house on 14.01.2011 and take her back to her matrimonial home. I find from the order dated 13.5.2011 that the dates for Bidagari have been extended from time to time, namely on 16.4.2011, 13.5.2011 and 30.5.2011. More than six months have elapsed but the petitioner has not yet taken the complainant to her matrimonial home. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however points out certain facts and circumstances, mainly the death of the petitioner’s elder brother and his father, in the recent past, which have prevented the petitioner from carrying out his aforesaid obligation. In this view of the matter, therefore, this court is of the opinion that the ends of justice will be met, if the order dated 30.5.2011 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Purnea, is modified only to the extent that the date of Bidagari is extended by one month from today. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to take the complainant to her matrimonial home on or before 11.8.2011. The remaining terms of the order dated 30.5.2011 will continue. With these observations, this application is disposed of. Fahad. ( Vikash Jain, J. )