IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 6TH APRIL 2010 / 16TH CHAITHRA 1932 SA.NO. 774 OF 1997(A) -------------------------------- AS.114/1996 OF DISTRICT COURT, KASARAGOD OS.53/1990 OF SUB COURT, HOSDRUG (IA 34/93) .................... APPELLANT(S) – APPELLANTS 1 TO 3 AND 6 - RESPONDENTS 2, 5 TO 8: -------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THALAKKAL KHADEEJA, WIDOW OF POYAKKARA IBRAHIM, RESIDING AT MARKET IN NILESHWAR VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, P.O. NILESHWAR 2. THALAKKAL SUHRA, D/O.POYAKKARA IBRAHIM, DO. DO. 3. THALAKKAL KUNHAYISSA, DO. DO. DO. 4. THALAKKAL RAMLATH, DO. DO. DO. 5. THALAKKAL SHAMSUDDIN, S/O. DO. DO. BY ADV. SRI.KODOTH SREEDHARAN RESPONDENT(S) – RESPONDENT & APPELLANTS PETITIONER & DEFENDANTS 1, 9 TO 11 AND 3, 4: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. POYAKKARA NABEESUMMA, W/O.THALAKKAL ABDULKHADER RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.6/553 PALLIKKARE, NILESHWAR VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, P.O. NILESHWAR. 2. POYAKKARA AYISUMMA, D/O. PATHUMMA, REISIDING AT PEROLE VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, P.O. NILESHWAR. 3. NALUPURAPPATTIL ABOOBACKER, S/O.ABDULKHADER, RESIDING AT PALLIKKARE, NILESWHAR VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, P.O. NILESWHAR. 4. CHERAMMAL SAINABA, D/O.KAMMADATH PUZHAKKARE ABDULRAHIMAN, RESIDING AT VATTAPOYIL, NILESHWAR VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, P.O. NILESHWAR. 5. SHAJITHA, D/O. CHERAMMAL SAINABA, RESIDING AT VATTAPOYIL, NILESHWAR VILLAGE, HOSDRUG TAKUK, P.O. NILESHWAR. 6. THALAKKAL MUSTHAFFA, S/O,. POYAKKARA IBRAHIM, RESIDING AT MARKET, NILESHWAR VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK P.O. NILESHWAR. 7. THALAKKAL ABDULKHADER, S/O.DO. DO. DO. ADV. SRI.S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR R1 SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN FOR R1, SRI.P.K.MUHAMMED FOR R2,R3 & R5 THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J. ================================= S.A. NO.774 of 1997 ================================= Dated this the 6th day of April, 2010 J U D G M E N T Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo stating that appellant No.1 has expired and that her legal representatives are already on record being other appellants and respondents. It is submitted that the appeal may be dismissed as not pressed. Submission is recorded. Second Appeal is dismissed as not pressed. No costs. THOMAS P.JOSEPH, JUDGE. vsv THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J. ================== S.A. NO.328 OF 1996 =========================== J U D G M E N T 6TH APRIL, 2010