IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6815 of 2009 SMT.HEMLATA & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 4 13.8.2009 Though the matter has been listed under the heading “for order” (on office note) for taking steps for fresh service of notice on respondent no.2, the Court is prima facie satisfied that the petitioner has remedy within the ambit of the Act of the Code of Civil Procedure against the impugned order dated 22.4.2009 contained in annexure-6 passed by the Execution Munsif, Patna in Execution Case No. 3 of 2002. There is no specific reason why the same should be permitted to be challenged by way of a writ application. This writ application is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to do the needful in accordance with law. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)