1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4703 OF 2010 (Sudhakar U. Ambagade) -: VERSUS :- (Samyak Shikshan Prasarak Mandal & Others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri N. M. Jighkate Adv for petitioner. Shri A. W. Joshi AGP for respondent no.4. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : OCTOBER 5, 2010. Heard Shri Jibhkate, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Joshi learned AGP for the respondent No.4. Learned AGP has pointed that petitioner has procured the job by paying amount of Rs. 20,000/- to the Management and had agreed to pay Rs. 30,000/- in future. He therefore states that Court should not interfere in the matter. According to Shri Jibhkate Management did not accept the fact of such payment. He further contended that after the alleged payment there was fresh advertisement and fresh selection process, hence 2 alleged payment has no bearing on said selection. In Appeal Memo as filed, in para 3 petitioner has disclosed the fact of payment. The said fact is also disclosed in para 3 of present petition. I am, therefore, not inclined to interfere in the matter. Petition is, therefore, rejected. No costs. JUDGE SVK