IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10950 of 2011 Amrita Kumari Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 2 15.9.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Annexure-4 gives the background upon which the appointment of Asgari Kalim was set aside from the post of Anganbari Sevika on the finding that her selection was not carried out according to law and, in fact, her selection was done on telephonic information of the Block Development Officer. Thus in the background of how the earlier selection was carried out the claim of the petitioner, whose name figures at Serial No.1, has also no meaning and validity because the same was obviously against the guideline as no amsabha was held. Since under the aforesaid circumstance the entire selection process is vitiated no right accrues to the petitioner for her appointment. Her case will be considered by the respondent concerned when a fresh exercise for appointment is carried out. Writ petition is otherwise dismissed being devoid of merit in this regard. AnilKrSinha (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)