IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.724 of 2009 Date of Decision:29.07.2009 Pardeep Kumar .... petitioner Versus Shrikant Walgadh, Director Rural Development .....respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Mr.Babbar Bhan,Advocate for the petitioner Mr.S.K.Hooda, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent **** RAKESH KUMAR GARG J.(ORAL): Admittedly, after issuance of directions dated 15.09.2008 passed in CWP No.16346 of 2008, respondent No.2 has passed an order dated 28.11.2008 deciding the representation of the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner has argued that though the aforesaid order has been passed, however, all the contentions raised by the petitioner in his writ petition are not being replied to. Be that as it may, in view of the fact that order Annexure P-2 has been passed on the representation of the petitioner, I am not inclined to proceed further in this contempt petition. Rule discharged. The petitioner shall be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid order Annexure P-2 and Annexure-I and Annexure-II as attached with reply in accordance with the law. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 29.07.2009 neenu