^'v... ^ •r IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C. No. /2010(S.B.) (Arisingout ofW.P. No. 1326/2002 Hon'ble S.B.) ^APPLICANT .^^ ^"^ •^-::1 ^^ ^>^ 'v ^-Kundan Lal Bambesar ^eJ 3<?^<32^f S/o Shri Nand Lal Bambesar, Village and P.O.Mahud Machandur, P.S. Chauki, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) .^s.."' YERSUS NON-APPLICANTS : y Union of India Through The Director General Central Industrial Security Force, 13, C.G.O. Complex Ministry of Home Affairs Lodhi Road, New Delhi. The Deputy Inspector General, Central Industrial Security Force (S.Z.) Ministry of Home Affairs Rajaji Bhavan, Basant Nagar, Chennai- 90 The Inspector General (S.W.S.) Central Industrial Security Force, (Ministry of Home Affairs ) CISF RCFL Complex, Chembur, Mumbai-74. ^ 5) \'^ The Commandant Central Industrial Security Force (Ministry of Honie Affairs) CISF 6th Resbn Arakkonam (T/N) ^ P^^c</><4^-<* The (?'inancial) ._Central Industrial Security Force (Ministry of Honie Affairs) R.T.C. Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.) The Group Commandant Central Industrial Security Force (Ministry of Hoine Affairs ) Group Head Office, Kochin, Vennale Post Kochin- 28. APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF THE W.P. No. 1326/2002 -.-y^i^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BiLASPUR APPLiCANT NON-APPLICANTS M.C.C. EMo.49of2010 Kundan Laj Bambesar VERSUS Union of india & Others h~ APPLiCATSON FOR RESTORATiON OF VV.P. N0.1326/2002. SB- hi&..'b!e Slyi,Sati&h K,,__£,gn|hotr^ Present: Shn J.S.P. Chandrasen, Advocate for the appiicant. Ms. Fouzia iVlirza, Advocate for the respondent NoJ. ORD£R{ORAL1 (P353ed on'28tn'dayofAprJi, 2011) Heard. 1. l.A, No/i, appilcation tbr condonation of delay. 2. There Is deiav of 40 davs in filina the restoration appiicatlon, to whjch iearned counsei appearing forocher side nas no objection. 3. Sufficlent and cogent reasons have been shown for condonatlon of delay. Accordlngiy, IA. NoJ, appiication for condonation of deiay in flilng mlscelianeous appiicatjon, is allowed< 4. Learned counsei appearing for the petiticner submits that the counsei for the petitioner could not appear on account of bona flde mistake, therefore, Writ Petltion No. 1326/2002, which was dlsmlsssd on 06/11./2009, may be restored to its rlle. 5. Reasonable and sufficient cause has been shown. VVrit Petitlon No, 1326/2002, Is restored to the original file, subject to deposit of a sum of Rs.1,000/- to the Hlgh Court Legai Ald Commjttee< 6. A copv of this order be piaced on record of the oriainai vmt petltJon and the same be listed for heanng. Arun Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge