{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 85 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION STAMP NO.06 OF 2010 Mohammad Shafioddin s/o Rashidoddin APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. S.G.Ladda, Advocate for applicant Mr. N.B.Patil, APP for respondent No.1 State ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 2nd March 2010 PER COURT: 1. Heard. Issue notice to respondent No.1 only. Learned APP accepts the notice. By this application the applicant has prayed for condonation of delay of 73 days in preferring criminal revision against the order of acquittal rendered in Sessions Case No.70/2007 by the Sessions Judge Parbhani. For the grounds stated in paragraphs No.2 to 5 of the application, it is clear that the delay is not intentional or deliberate and hence required to be condoned. In the result, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses “A” and “B” and stands disposed of. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A10/criapln85-10 {2} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 85 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION STAMP NO.06 OF 2010 Mohammad Shafioddin s/o Rashidoddin APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. S.G.Ladda, Advocate for applicant Mr. N.B.Patil, APP for respondent No.1 State ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 2nd March 2010 PER COURT: 1. Heard. Presently, issue notice to respondent No.1 only. APP accepts notice for respondent No.1. S.O. to 13.04.2010. Call for Record and Proceedings. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A10/criapln85-10