HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No.4986 of 2010 09-03-2010 Between: Sri Boga Nanda Kishore … Petitioner And M/s.Singareni Collieries Company Limited, rep. by its Director and four others. … Respondents Order: In this writ petition, the petitioner questions the action of the respondents in taking steps for vacation of the quarter bearing No.SD56, JK Colony, Yellandu, Khammam District, in which the petitioner has been residing. 2. Initially, the petitioner was appointed as Badli worker on 15-05-1988 in the 1st respondent- M/s.Singareni Collieries Company Limited and thereafter promoted as Clerk on 21-03- 1997. While he was working as clerk at Yellandu he was transferred to Bhoopalpally on 06-12-2006. Later disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the petitioner on the ground of disobedience of reasonable instructions of superiors and absence from duty from 04-10-2006 onwards. Thereafter, the petitioner was dismissed from service vide proceedings of the 1st respondent bearing Ref No.CRP/PER/IR/D/92 dated 09.07.2009 and the said dismissal order is came into effect from 13-07-2009. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner had already questioned the order of dismissal by raising an industrial dispute, being LCID No.61 of 2009, before the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad. Further it is submitted that in spite of his transfer to Bhoopalpally, he has not vacated the quarter at Yellandu because the children of the petitioner were studying and at this point of time if the petitioner was evicted he will be put to irreparable loss. Moreover on 18-11-2009 the petitioner submitted a representation to the General Manager of the 1st respondent-Company for payment of CMPF contribution amount but the same has not yet been considered, is the further grievance. 4. With reference to the above contention, it is to be noted that the petitioner was transferred from Yellandu to Bhoopalpally as early as on 06-12-2006 and thereafter certain disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him and he was dismissed from service on 13-07-2009. In that view of the matter, there is absolutely no reason for the petitioner to retain the quarter at Yellandu. 5. For the aforesaid reason, I do not find any merits in the writ petition and is liable to be dismissed. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner made any application for return of his CMPF contribution, the said application shall be processed as expeditiously as possible. 6. Subject to above observation, the writ petition is dismissed at the stage of admission. No order as to costs. ____________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 9th MARCH 2010 TSNR