IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH I.T.A. No. 52 of 1999 DATE OF DECISION: 10.7.2007 The Commissioner of Income-tax, Jalandhar …Appellant Versus M/s Mohan Lal and Company, Jalandhar Cantt. …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL Present: None. JUDGMENT M.M. KUMAR, J. On 5.12.2001, learned counsel for the revenue had stated that the Assessing Officer had not finalised the assessment in pursuance to the order dated 31.1.2000, passed by the Tribunal in the case of Kailash Kumar, who was stated to be a partner in the assessee firm. The matter was adjourned sine die and the same was to be listed after the counsel had produced a copy of the order passed by the Assessing Officer. The matter was listed on 12.3.2007 and the counsel for the revenue was directed to comply with the order dated I.T.A. No. 52 of 1999 5.12.2001. However, the order has not been complied with as copy of the assessment order has not been placed on record. In view of the above, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) July 10, 2007 JUDGE Pkapoor 2