1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Bail Application No. 7720/2010 Nand Kishore Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 19.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Dilip Sharma - for the petitioner Mr Amit Poonia - Public Prosecutor BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that to show bona fide, petitioner will deposit a sum of Rs.5 lakhs with the trial court within one month from today. This is only to take steps to settle the matter with complainant. However, that can be finalised only after petitioner is granted bail. Looking to the aforesaid, petitioner may be granted bail. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. After considering rival submissions of the parties, statement made at the Bar by learned counsel for petitioner, and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may 2 otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am of the view that petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is accepted and it is directed that accused-petitioner namely; Nand Kishore may be enlarged on bail under section 439 CrPC in FIR No. 161/2010 registered at Police Station – Christian Gang, Ajmer for offence under Section/s 406 and 418 IPC provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. It is made clear that if petitioner fails to deposit a sum of Rs.5 lakhs within one month from today with the trial court, as stated above, this bail order will stand cancelled automatically without further reference to this court. List this case again on 22.9.2010 to find out the aforesaid. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma