1 pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATEJURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8191 OF 2010 Vasant Namdeo Kamble ...Petitioner Versus Dadasaheb Sadashiv Kamble & Others ...Respondents Mr.Ajay Joshi for the Petitioner CORAM:- R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED:- 19th SEPTEMBER, 2011. P.C. 1. Regular Civil Suit No.345 of 2010 came to be filed in the court of 6th Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Pandharpur, District Solapurm by the respondent nos.15 and 16 for partition. According to the petitioner, the petitioner has purchased a part of the land from Nagarbhai i.e. respondent no.15, original plaintiff no.1, in regard to which the suit has been filed. The petitioner, filed in the court of 6th Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Pandharpur, application at Exhibit 16 praying that the petitioner be joined as plaintiff. That application 2 has been rejected. I have heard learned Advocate for the petitioner. If the petitioner has purchased a part of the land, which is subject matter of the aforesaid Civil Suit, it can be observed that he has some interest in the litigation. The desire of the petitioner that he should be permitted to be joined as plaintiff along with other two plaintiffs itself is contrary to the well established principles as regards joining of a party to the said suit. It is possible to observe that the petitioner may like to be joined as party defendant in this suit. For that he could have made a separate application with appropriate prayers. The course adopted by the petitioner vide Exhibit 15 was erroneous. The learned Judge rightly rejected the said application. No interference is called for in the impugned order dated 9.7.2010. It may be open for the petitioner to file an application for being joined as party defendant in the aforesaid civil suit. Needless to mention that the said application will have to be decided on merits and any observance will not help the petitioner. 2. With above order, petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)