» IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER: W.P.NO. ^e/200^/ : Smt. Sarita Bai, W/o. Krishna Kumar, age 22 years, R/o. Sankapat. Vill-Panchayat Saraiset, Tah-Pandaria, Dist• Kawardha *C,G.) » RESPONDENTSJ^f^ ^.^%r^"*T \ ....-^A.^ ^:^^^^ L.'.-1-' -••k< L^ ^.^ ^ ^^^$>t VERSUS !• State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary Woman, & Child Development. J) k ^ S ^ /> v^/^ ^f\-L.^U:(L CC.G,.) Cpllector, Kawardha Jj[>^^-. Jk/) W^ftJ>Hft ^ c .6,^ Chief Executive Officer, Janpad P^nchayat, Panderia• ~^^^-'~ K.fi^W^Hft (C.C,J Vill• Panchayat Saraiset ^/,,y ^hrough Sarpanch. '' f^?ciy^ - s^^ca-^'^tt . kft w -^J>/J) ^^ -»5. Parivoiana Adhikari. (<-•("'} v 2 —3 {. IA^_ T]//^ c^ \0 Pariyojana Adhikari, Women & Child Deyelopment, Pandaria. ^P^^t-~ /;/; l^ /?^^^ ^J^C. (S ^) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUJ^NCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI AND/OR ORDER (S), AND/OR DIRECTION (S) . ^ "^ .Z"^^l-. XI-HC—78 3:H^T'SRT "fefNF iW 37T^T st)Rt<=b 'TST '^siFTT^PT, ^xtl ^•i|<o, I^TTa"^: > _^....:.M£..:M1.Q.^............ . ^l^dl*Ni4»^'?"^'1"^^^^^^^^ ?n^?[ TWF (^^^) ^^fW'^Rf^T 3H^?T O'T.01.2004 Shri P. Das, counsel for tjl Shri A. Agarwal, Advocat^ Heard.' The petitioner nas appli^ Viilage Panchayat Sankapat. H in ^ spite of being qualified and the petitioner moved an appeal considering the docunients of ooncluslon that the petitioner i^ An-ganwadi worker, therefore, t{ appoinr the petltioner as Aganv| Collector is Annexure R-3. The. Ghief Executive { (i-espondent No, 3) in conipHanc^ appointinent order pn 14.1 1.2.CJ Cotlecfcor and further canceling post of Angan Badi worker petitioner on fche said' post. A respondcT-it nos.3 & 5 on 18.11 cotTipliance of the above order wifch the orders of respondent do' Angaa Badi,: On 09,12.200^ responderit no. 4 stressing upo^ hc had appointed;the petitionei|' ihe needml be done. Then tl1< no.2 during his camp dated 2^ .wriiing'about ,her grievance. <^l<l(<yl<i1l TTFT^yf '^^1(^Tf^$R ^ 3JfiW 3TT^T he petitioner. for the respQndent. U for the post of Anganwadi workers for )wever; the petiltioner was. nQt appointed Migible for the post. Aggrieved therewith beforelthe Collector, Kawardha and after the pejtitioner fhe Collector reached the fully qualified and eligible for the post of fie CollectGr diiiected respondent no<3 to acli wdrker. THe copy of the order of the )fficer,r J^.npad Panchayat, Pandeirya I of theorder-dated 07,10,2002 issued an 03 stating theiiein, fche ciirections of the tlie itnpugned earlier appoinfment foi1 the laniely Khelkumari and appointed the ^cordingly the pctitioner appeared before 2002 and subnutted herjoining report in 3-ut the responaent No,5 did not cornply 3'.3 regarding a^sigiiing her duty/work of fesppndent. ao<3 issued % •ni.ernp to fche earlier ordjer issusd by him wherein 'as AriRan Badiiworksr arid directed fchat. e petitiorwr approached the respondent \,11.2Q02 a^ Pandariya apprising him in "he re%pondent| no.3 issued yet another XI-HC-22 I ^l^l^ R^i^b ^a^H »^R3tt%^ ^^.- f^ RoshQn/- ^ ^ \" <\ ^^%^l^';%i ;3^^^i^<^^'<al^'*^,i !i'iS:@^%Iff| %8gS®ffWB|S%®% (t^: iS<<ni^^< 1^1^^ ^^^^6^/OJI. Ni*iai w*ii<sn •^200 memo dated-'l 1,12,2002 to thei -Pxi reference to tKe coinplaint ofj t^ immediatelv take action and | d4 compliance of the same., Ho-^fev^ Officer,! Wbmen 8s Child Developh'ielit the prders and directions issuejd 1^ 07..1Q.2002 aind the respondeni n^ perform her duty nor the petitiorjier Learned counBel for the allowed to make a; representationi grievances to |whieh lcarned State q<| Having Keard the learned <} regard to the facts| and a.Uowed to make a detailed repret wiflainjten days !rom today to resp^i petiqioner oircumstAnces Nb^ 1 after considering all the gnevaj "/ representation ^ithiri^^^^a fhe sarrie in an objectiye manner wr| Wifh fche above directionsl th^ In view of thi^ order, M,(W,)Pj Cerfcified copy.as per rulefe. <ftl<ii<i<il^ ^wx^?^ fel<3 <I^it^< I^^PaN^^i oject Officer ^(responderit No. 5) with' e petifioner and directing hlm to sing the needful and inform the T,. jthe respondent no.5 the PrGJeefc has deliberately not cbmplied -wlth y fhe appellate aythority pas^ed on ),5J is n6t allowing the petitioner to .s being paid salary.^ submits that petitioner may be toJ respon^ent no. I raising all her ^unsel has 4o Gbj^ctjon. iounsel for the ;panties and having of th^e casey the petitioner is ^eatation r^ismg al hi^ grievances ^ndent No. 1) and in tum. t'eQppndent tio^s of the betitioner shall decide the tljiiity days ri'prn.the date o |h a reasonAd order. j " - petition ^t^.nd& di^posedof, |NG,06/200J4 standsJ disposed of. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge (^^s^