ResRondenis HiSHCOURTQFCHHAmSSARH:_BliASPUR Wn't Petitison iS) No. 2874 of 2007 Smt.Shiv Kumar Pandey, aged about 65 years, d/o. Gouri Shankar Pandey, r/o. near Azad Chowk, Pendra Distrtot Bilaspur (CG). 4') o) &\ ^! 1S State of Chhattisgarh - throuah the Secretarv. Department of Sc'nool Education, h'antraiaya, D.K.S. Bha^van, Raipur(CG). 2) Director, Department or School Educatlon, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 3) Districf Education Ofr'ioer, District Bilaspur (CG), Biock Education Officer. Ma'vahi, District iilaspur, C.G. T'ne Director (Accounts, Treasury and Pensjon), C'ivision Offioe, Raipur, C.G. Accountant General, o/O. Accoutanf Generai, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. / \'A'rit Petition underArticie 226 ofthe Con^itutlon of India) SB: HOI mt: None for the petitioner. Shri U-N.S. Deo, Govt. Advocate for the State. (Passed on 21" February,2008) None for the petstioner, however, in the facts of ths case, the matts' is taken up for hearing. 2) By t'nis petition, the petitioner, v,'ho is a retired emptoyee, is claiming retiral beneflts. 3) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submit that on 19.06.2006 in W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrater Vs. State Go-i/ernment of Chhaitisgarh and others), this Court passed t'ne followng order: "..... tn tuTR, the A.G. Office is getting incorrect iRformation and not able to give authority letter at the time cn retirement of an employee, therefore, a committee consisting offoilowing orficers is constituted: 0) (2) (3) (5) Specia) Seoretary (Finance), (Chairman), Any officer of the rank of Addttional Secretary of Law Department, (Member), Director, Treasury, Accourts and Pension, (Member), Deputy Accountant Generai (Funds), (Member), Joini Secretary (General Administration Department, State of Chhattisgarh), (Member cum Secretary)" 4) Learned counsei appearing for ffie State submits that pursuant to the above order a Committes, consisting of the above-stated officers has been constituted to !ook Into the grievances of the retired empioyees, in respect of retiral dues. '/ in this petition, the disputed question of facts with regard to the retiral dues (supra) are invoived, which cannot be decided by this Court, as the disputed questions of facts can be resoived by the hlgh power committee (supra) in consultation with the retired employee and the concerned ofricers. Thus, I am of the considersd opinion t'nat it v!/ouid be jusi and expedient to direct the above Committee, so constituted, to look into the disputes and pass appropriate orders, in accordanoe v/ith law. . • 8) Accordingiy, the office of the Advocate Gsnerai is directed to send the case to the Committee, 'A'it'n!". a period of 15 days from the date of rec&ipt of a copy of t'nis ordgr. Thereafter, the Committee shaii issue notice to the aggrieved retired empioyee \^ and the officere concerned, within a further period OT 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order, in aocordance 'A'ith law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the eRipioyee. The employee ooncerned and the officers concerned may fi!e additional'documents; if necessa"/. The entire exsroise, inctuding payment of retii'-ai dues (supra), if any, to the petitioner, be compietsd wiihin a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order. 7$ tn view of the foregoing, the petition Is disposed of. No order asto oosts. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge