3.3: HON’BLE JusTICE MR. ’PRITINKER DIWAKER" ‘ 30-10-2009: Shri VivekJ‘Chopra, courtsei for the applicant: shri Vaibhav Goverdha , Panel Lawyer for the State. This petition has been f ed bythe applicant for modification] correction of the order Id ted 07.10.2009 passed in M.Cr.C. No.2258/2009. Contention of the cou sei for the applicant is that as in the impugned bail rejection ord r of the court below' dated 16.9.2009 crime number was mention d as 351/2009 of Poiice Station Civil Lines, Raipur, the same was reproduced in the bail application flied by the applicant before this Court. He submits that at, the time of passing of the order dated 7 10.2009 the mistake committed'by the applicant could not be broug into the notice of this court and as per the pleadings of the bail appl ation crime number was mentioned as 351/2009 whereas the corre t crime number is 357/2009 of Police Station Civil Lines, Raipur in lation to the offence under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code. 0n the last date of he ring, Ieamed counsel for the State was: directed to verify the above ts and to call for the ca‘sedtary. Learned State counsel fairly admits that correct crime number is 357/2009'and not 351/200 , Wmégq‘q‘gNbgéE/ ..... ‘m 200a mw (Wu) man Hfaam mum—rtW ‘ Fa”!W %a aimm @ mam (WEI) WWW ammm WWW in view of the abov factual mistake committe by the applicant, order dated 7.10. same is in relation to crime . 357/2009 o Pole Statio Civ Lines, l Raipur. Otherzconditions ae mentione n the rder date .10.29rill remain as’ifs.‘ WW‘§1‘E€IW awimm .—Z/ e d .20 i modifi t h extent ha the 09 s ed o. te tt ho f ic n il d i o d 700w Sdl- itinker Diwaker d Juge mm 200 m - Certitied'copy today. > mm unwwm Pr