^•Y ,1.- <$) HIGH COURT GP CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER W.P.CSt N0. ST66/2007 Bhikham 1^1 Gond, aged 60 years, Sou of Bud^-am, Periuaaent Labour (Gangman), Workiug under S. D.0., P.V/.D., Patan, District Dui^ (CG) Vs. RESPONDENT8 The State Govemineiit of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, F'ublic Works Departaient Ministiy, D.K.S.Bhawaa, Raipur (CG) Sub Divisional Officer, P.W.D., Patau-Division, TahsU Patan, Distt. Durg (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER A1RTICLE 286 OF THB COHSTITUTIGH OF INDIA nesence : Sbri Somkant Verma, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sumit Venaa, Paael Lawyer for fhe State/ respondents. t^Al.ORDER (06.11.2007) SUSIL KUMAR SIHHA. J. Heard. l^eamed coiinsel for thc petitioner submits that a pennanent Gang-inan is to be retired at the age of 6'2 years in accordaiice wifh the Chhaliisgarh Shaskiya Sevak (Adhwarshiki-Ayuj Adhimycan. 1967 read witti Fundamental Rutes, 56. He also submits t1iat the point raised has been decided by this Court in batch of matters i.e. W.P. No. 108/2005 and many other connectcd raatters on 04.01.2007, reported m 3007/3i C.G.L^J. 29 fGovlna. Ss Others Vs. Stdte ^fC.G. emd. others) and this matter is squarely covered by that decision, which inay be disposed ofou the same tenns. Uamed counsel for ihr State fairly agrees that this inatter is covered by the said deeisioiz. HOWRVCI-, Ue subniits that in sorae niatters the State has filed writ acneals. W.P.(S)NO. 5766 OF 2007 Unless soine interiin order is passed, nierRly on accoiint. of filing of the writ appeal, hearing of this wi-it petition cannot be kept in abeyance, whcn tJie matter is sqiiardy coveiTid by the said judgraent. In the resutt, flus petition is allowed. It is disposed of in tenns of the orcter dated 04.01.2007 passed m W.P. No. 108/2005 anrl other connected matters. No orier as to cost _— Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Suguna y l^