IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1523 of 2011 Ramesh Prasad Sah Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ----------- 2 29.06.2011 Heard Mr. Bajarangi Lal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Amitesh Kumar, learned counsel for the opposite party No.2, Chief Executive Officer, Village & Khadi Industry Board and Mr. Ajay Kumar Sharma learned A.C. to A.A.G.1 for the State. A show cause has been filed on behalf of the Respondent- Board through its Chief Executive Officer reporting compliance of the directions of this Court as recorded in the order dated 12.04.2010 passed in C.W.J.C.No. 1776 of 2006. The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the Chief Executive Officer to consider the claims of the petitioner as regarding the arrears of salary for the period 01.05.1990 to 31.01.1996 and pay the same, if found admissible or dispose of the claim by a reasoned order. The respondent No.4 was also directed to provide a calculation chart in relation to contributory provident fund of the petitioner containing details of deductions of principal amount together with details of interest. Learned counsel for the Board presents a cheque for an amount of Rs. 2,27,943/- said to be towards the arrears of salary of the petitioner for the period October, 1990 until 02.06.1994. Learned counsel for the Board placing reliance at Annexure- A of the show cause submits that the grievance of the petitioner was considered by the Chief Executive Officer and as the petitioner was found to be unauthorized absent during the period 03.06.1994 to 31.01.1996 hence no payment towards salary of the petitioner has been 2 made on the principles of no work no pay. The cheque is being handed over to Mr. Bagarangi Lal learned counsel for the petitioner, who accepts the same. Mr. Bajarangi Lal questions the order in so far as it has rejected the claim towards arrears of salary of the petitioner for the period 03.06.1994 to 31.01.1996. He may do so before an appropriate forum by filing an appropriate application. In the opinion of this Court, the order in so far as the payments of salary is concerned, stands substantially complied at the hands of the Chief Executive Officer. In so far as providing the calculation chart in relation to the contributory provident fund is concerned, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the statement of account as placed with Annexure-C/1 is not in tune with the directions of this Court and it contains no details of deposit for the period prior to 01.01.2005 and/or interest. Learned counsel for the Board submits that a fresh calculation chart along with the details of deduction of principal amount and interest would be provided to the petitioner without any further delay and latest by 27.07.2011. On assurance being given by the learned counsel for the Khadi Industry Board that the petitioner would be provided with a detailed calculation chart in relation to his contributory provident fund in terms of the directions of this Court, this application is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to revive the same in case the Chief Executive Officer fails in his undertaking of providing the calculation 3 chart of the contributory provident fund to the petitioner in terms of the directions of this Court. In so far as the petitioner disputes the correctness of the order as contained in Annexure-A rejecting his claim for arrears of salary for the period 03.06.1994 to 31.01.1996 on the grounds of unauthorized absence, the petitioner shall be at liberty to challenge the said order in an appropriate proceedings before an appropriate forum. The contempt application is disposed of. Bibhash (Jyoti Saran, J.)