IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.10684 -M of 2011 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : AUGUST 17, 2011 JAI BHAGWAN & ORS. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Nemo. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 This petition has been filed under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, praying for quashing of FIR No.48 dated 8.2.2011 under Sections 402, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Ambala City, District Ambala (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings, on the basis of compromise dated 1.4.2011 (Annexure P-2). 2 Vide order dated 7.4.2011, the Illaqa Magistrate was directed to verify genuineness of compromise, after taking statements of concerned parties, and report. 3 Report dated 13.5.2011 has been received from Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ambala, from which it is made out that the parties have made statements before the court, without coercion and influence, to the effect that all the disputes have been Criminal Misc. No.10684 -M of 2011 (O&M) 2 settled by way of compromise. 4 Considering the report furnished by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ambala, it transpires that all the disputes between the petitioners and respondent No.2 have been settled. The offences are more of civil nature. Since the complainant is not ready to pursue the case against the petitioners, no purpose in law will be served by continuance of proceedings. 5 The petition is, accordingly, allowed. 6 FIR No.48 dated 8.2.2011 under Sections 402, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Ambala City, District Ambala (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings are hereby quashed. August 17, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?