IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.202 of 2007 QAISAR AHMAD, son of late Kafil Ahmad, resident of village-Rajapur,P.O. Dihuli Bujurg, Police Station- Sakara, District-Muzaffarpur. At present posted and working as an Assistant Teacher in Govt. Middle School Parsauni Devajit, Anchal-Mahasi, District-East Champaran (Motihari)……Petitioner Versus (1) STATE OF BIHAR. (2) The Secretary, Primary and Adult Education, Bihar, Patna. (3) The Director, Primary and Adult Education, Bihar, Patna. (4) The Chief Accounts Controller, (Audit) Finance Department, Govt.of Bihar, Patna. (5) The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Tirhut Division,District- Muzaffarur (6) The District Ecucation Establishment Committee through it’s Chairmant, the Deputy Development Commissioner, Motihari, District-East Champaran. (7) The District Superintendent of Education, Motihari,Motihari, Dist-East Champaran. (8) The Range Education Officer, Mehasi, Dist-East Champaran. (9) The District Magistrate, Motihari.Dist-East Champaran. (10) The District Treasury Officer, Motihari, Dist.East Champaran…………… Respondents ----------- For the petitioner:- Sri Rajendra Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate Sri Umesh K. Mishra, Advocate For the State :- Sri Dhananjay Kumar, JC to GP-12. 2 4/ 15-Oct-08 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. On going through the order under review and the policy decisions of the State as clarified from time to time I am not persuaded to hold that the order under review is based upon incorrect appreciation of clarification issued on 13.8.1990 after consultation of the Finance Department. In that view of the matter the prayer for review is rejected. It goes without saying that if the petitioner’s pay profile has undergone change on account of subsequent orders granting him intermediate scale from earlier date than 1.1.1986 then he will be at liberty to approach the concerned authorities and seek appropriate relief in accordance with law. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)