IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN THURSDAY, THE 17TH JUNE 2010 / 27TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 15565 of 2010(U) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ JAYAKRISHNAN E.P., AMBADY HOUSE, PUNNASSERI P.O., KODUVALLY. BY ADV. SRI.STALIN PETER DAVIS RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- THE SECRETARY. R.T.A. VATAKARA. BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. K.C. SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J ........................................... WP(C).NO.15565 OF 2010 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner is the owner of a Stage Carriage bearing registration No.KL-57/B 3906, conducting services on the route Narikkuni - Ballussery - Perambra. According to the petitioner, his timings were settled on 8.12.2001. However, since the settlement of his timings, revision of timings has been granted to various other services. Similarly, variations in the route have also been granted to other operators. Due to the above change in circumstances, the petitioner has sought for the revision of his own timings by submitting Ext.P2 application. The petitioner seeks the issue of a direction to consider and dispose of Ext.P2 on an early date. 2. The learned Senior Government Pleader submits that he is not in a position to say whether Ext.P2 has actually been received and is pending consideration of the respondent. Therefore, he requests that it may be made clear that the direction issued hereunder shall be subject to the rider that the application has actually been received and is Wpc 15565/2010 2 pending. 3. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of directing the respondent to consider and pass final orders on the request for the revision of his own timings submitted by the petitioner, evidenced herein by Ext.P2, in accordance with law, if the same has actually been received and is pending on this date, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE lgk