I W‘ GOM/ k r “A?“ n? Iu i‘m k BEFORE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTTSGARH AT BILASPUR ‘ Aged about 22 years W/O Gaurav Kumar Kakkar 2.x“ 2 ‘Mw‘wk “‘“WU‘; D/O Shri Gopal Prasad Agrawal R/O Vandana House Civil Lines Raipur, Tah. & Distt Raipur (C.G) Shri Gopal Prasad Agrawal Aged about 50 years S/O Niranjan Lal Agrawal R/O Vandana House Civil Lines Raipur, Tah. & Distt Raipur (C.G) Aacharya Jai Dev Shashtri Aacharya Arya Samaj Kohka, Bhilai Nagar Maharishi Dayanand Chaowk Kurud Road Kohka Bhilai 490028 Tah. & Distt Durg (C.G) Arya Samaj Kohka Bhilai Nagar Maharishi Dayanand Chaowk Kurud Road Kohka Bhilai 490028 (affiliated to Arya Pratinidhi Sabha M.P. & Vidharbha) Registration No. 109 (N) Affiliation no. 149; " Through - President Arya Samaj Kohka Bhilai Nagar Maharishi Dayanand Chaowk Kurud Road Kohka Bhilai 490028 Tah. & Distt Durg (C.G) State of Chhattisgarh Through Town Inspector Police Statlon CIVII edsRalpur Tah & D' Ralpur (C G) w WRIT PETITION N0%§?f?.2004 PETITIONER: - lg GAURAV KUMAR KAKKAR 1 Aged about 24 years S/O Shri Kishan Kumar Kakkar R/O Gaurav Bhawan Punjabi Colony, Katora Talab Raipur (C.G) VERSUS $3 r x ’ RESPONDENTS: — 1. Smt SMRITI KAKKAR PETITION FOR HEABQUS CORPUS UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA )rx?NO‘H’OD .gffgffmzoo mam (W3) ai§§si 7cm W33 Han 311wW Wam§wmg $Wanés1 Emits—{ma anéal Division Bench' HON’BLE SHRI A.K PATNAIK C.J & HON’BLE SHE! SUNIL KUMAR SINHA J 04-07-2005 LA. No. 5488 of 2005:. This is an appncation for W P No 4600 of 200 Heard Mr VG Tamas ar ‘eamed counsel for the petluoner Mr P Drwarkar learned Sr Advocate th Mr Vlneet Shnvastava leamed counse! for respondent No 1 & 2 and Mr P ashant Mrshra AdditionalAdvocate General for the State of Chhattisgarh It Is stated by Mr V G T maskar teamed counsel for the petitioner and Mr P Dlwakar learned Sr Adv cate for respondents No 1 & 2 that the matter has been peacefully settled be een the partles _ r ’ ithdrawal of the writ petition. 4 n Mr. Tamaskar states th t In View of the aforesaid development, the SP/FS/2005 - 20,000 ox petitioner does not pursue this rlt petition no longer and wants to Withdraw this Writ petition. Accordingty, the writ peti n is dismissed as withdrawn. ~ ~~\i\ s ‘ /// ’x, e . Sd/~ Sd/- audit??? - . S“nil Kumar Judge Sinha