THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.1888 of 2010 Dated:30th April, 2010 Between: Avula Ramanarasamma ..... Petitioner AND 1. Naidi Narsamma & Ors. .....Respondents *** THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.1888 of 2010 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 22.01.2010 passed in I.A.No.1004 of 2009 in O.S.No.77 of 2007 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Nalgonda, whereby and whereunder the learned Senior Civil Judge allowed the application filed by the plaintiff under Order 1, Rule 10 r/w. Sec. 151 CPC. 2. The petitioner herein is the 1st defendant and the 1st respondent herein is the plaintiff in O.S.No.77 of 2007. The plaintiff filed the suit for partition and separate possession of her share in the suit schedule properties. On coming to know that the sole defendant in the suit alienated the properties in favour of the proposed parties, the plaintiff filed I.A.No.1004 of 2009 seeking impleadment of Edunooru Ravinder Reddy and Edunooru Surender Reddy, as defendants 2 and 3 in the suit. The 1st respondent filed the counter resisting the application. The Learned Senior Civil Judge, on considering the material brought on record and on hearing the counsel appearing for the parties, proceeded to allow the application on payment of costs of Rs.500/-, by order dated 22.01.2010. The said order is assailed in this revision. 3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the material brought on record. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner sold the part of the suit schedule land much prior to the filing of the suit and the 1st respondent/plaintiff having kept quiet for a long time moved the application under Order 1, Rule 10 r/w. Sec.151 CPC and therefore, the same is liable to be dismissed on the ground of laches. 5. As could be seen from para.5 of the order impugned in the revision, the petitioner herein, who is the sole defendant in the suit, pleaded of her sale of part of the suit schedule property in favour of the proposed parties. Thereupon, the plaintiff moved I.A.No.1004 of 2009 under Order 1, Rule 10 r/w. Sec.151 CPC seeking impleadment of the purchasers as defendants 2 and 3 in the suit. The order does not reflect of the proposed parties resisting the application for their impleadment. Such is the situation, I do not see any valid reason to interfere with the order impugned in the revision in exercise of powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 6. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed at the admission stage. No costs. ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date:30th April, 2010. cs THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.1888 of 2010 Dated:30th April, 2010