IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No.4286/2008 Decided on:4.8.2010 _____________________________________________ Shiv Ram. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. R.D. Kaundal, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. Advocate General. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Mr. R.D. Kaundal, Advocate appearing vice counsel on behalf of the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition has become infructuous with the passage of time. Accordingly, the same is dismissed having become infructuous. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 4.8.2010 *awasthi* 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?