1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.03.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN W.P.(MD).No.1409 of 2011 R.Jim @ Jim Reeves .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli City, Tirunelveli District. 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Perumalpuram, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli, Perumalpuram, Tirunelveli District. .. Respondents Prayer:- Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to delete the petitioner's name from the Rowdy H.S.No.63/2002 dated 01.05.2002 as per the petitioner's representation dated 19.04.2010. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Jim @ Jim Reeves For Respondents: Mr.K.Balasubramanian Addl.Govt.Pleader ORDER The writ petitioner, who appeared as party-in-person, would contend that earlier several false cases were filed against him. Since there was a dispute between him and police persons, he was declared as a proclaimed history- sheeted rowdy in H.S.No.63 of 2002, dated 01.05.2002. He would also contend that no case has been levelled against him in the police station since 2002 and he has been acquitted from all the previous cases. Now he has got B.L., degree and he has also working as a DTP Operator in an Advocate Office and he never have any intention being a history sheetr and his future life is affected because still his name is continued to be listed as https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 history sheeter. Therefore, he had already made a representation to the District Collector in 'Monday Grievances Redressal Meeting', held on 19.04.2010 and the same was forwarded to the Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli City. But, till date no orders has been passed. Even now, he continued to be as history sheeted rowdy. Hence, he sought for a Mandamus, directing the respondents to delete the petitioner's name from the Rowdy H.S.No.63/2002 dated 01.05.2002 as per his representation dated 19.04.2010. 2.The learned Additional Government Pleader took notice and brought to the notice of this Court that as on today, there is no case pending against him and that the second respondent is prepared to review the case of the petitioner, only if he submits an application before the second respondent to delete his name from the history sheeted rowdy. 3.Taking into consideration that he has already made a representation to the District Collector, it is suffice to say that the petitioner is permitted to make an application to the second respondent, the competent authority for reviewing the case, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on such representation being made by the petitioner, the second respondent is directed to consider the same and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four months thereafter. 4.The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar(LA) /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1.The Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli City, Tirunelveli District. 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Perumalpuram, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli,Perumalpuram, Tirunelveli District. +one cc to Special Government Pleader, Sr.No. 7129 MPK SMA/24.03.2011/5C/2P W.P.(MD).No.1409 of 2011 17.03.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/