IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18099 of 2010 BINDESHWARI THAKUR, S/o Munilal Thakur. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04. 09.08.2010 A supplementary-affidavit has been filed be kept on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 364 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the First Information Report on the basis of suspicion and during investigation also it transpired that there is no cogent material against him. Considering the same as also that the petitioner has fair antecedent, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Naugachia, District-Bhagalpur in connection with Naugachia (Parbatta) P.S. Case No. 12 of 2004 (G.R. No. 22A of 2004) subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one 2 of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)