IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE: 06-12-2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.26954 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 M/s.ETA General Private Limited, Rep. By its Assistant General Manager (Commercial), R.S.No.79, 80, and 81, Kalitheerthalkuppam, Mannadipet Commune, Pondicherry-605 107. .. Petitioner. Versus 1.The Director General of Police, Pondicherry. 2.The Senior Superintendent of Police (Law and Order), Pondicherry. 3.The Superintendent of Police (Rural), Pondicherry. 4.The Inspector of Police, Nettapakkam Circel, Pondicherry. 5.The Sub Inspector of Police/ Station House Officer, Thirupuvanai Police Station, Thirupuvanai, Pondicherry. .. Respondents. Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to provide adequate Police protection at the petitioner's factory premises at R.S.No.79, 80 and 81, Kalitheerthalkuppam, Mannadipet Commune, Pondicherry-605 107 to save the life and security of its employees and property from any third party. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar For Respondents : Mr.E.Vijayanand https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. Though the prayer sought for by the petitioner, in the present writ petition, is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the representation of the petitioner, dated 22.11.2010, is directed to be disposed of by the second respondent, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the second respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 22.11.2010, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as well as to the other parties concerned, on merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, not later than four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation, dated 22.11.2010, to the second respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. The writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar csh To 1.The Director General of Police, Pondicherry. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2.The Senior Superintendent of Police (Law and Order), Pondicherry. 3.The Superintendent of Police (Rural), Pondicherry. 4.The Inspector of Police, Nettapakkam Circel, Pondicherry. 5.The Sub Inspector of Police/ Station House Officer, Thirupuvanai Police Station, Thirupuvanai, Pondicherry. +1cc to M/s.R.Sureshkumar, Advocate Sr 87103 +1cc to Sr.Government Pleader Cum Sr.Public Prosecutor for Puducherry Sr 87084 MP(CO) km/7.12. Writ Petition No.26954 of 2010 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/