Crl.M.C. No. 4275/2009 Page 1 of 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl.M.C. No. 4275/2009 Reserved on: 00th January, 2010 Pronounced on: 25th January, 2010 # RAJESH KUMAR & ORS. ..... PETITIONER ! Through: Mr. R.S. Gupta, Adv. Versus $ STATE & ANR. ..... Respondent ^ Through: Mr.O.P. Saxena, APP * CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN 1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No : V.K. JAIN, J. 1. This is a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing FIR No.903/2006 lodged at PS Saraswati Vihar under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC. 2. The complainant was examined on 15th December, 2009 and she stated that her marriage with petitioner No.1 had already been dissolved by an award passed under Section 21 of Delhi Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 on 19th of August, 2001. She has received a sum of Rs.1 lakh from petitioner No.1 in full and final settlement of all her claims. As per the settlement, the child will remain with respondent No.2 and Crl.M.C. No. 4275/2009 Page 2 of 3 petitioner No.1 will continue to pay Rs.1,500/- for maintenance of the child till he attains the age of 21 years. The complainant has requested that the FIR lodged by her at PS Saraswati Vihar and the proceedings arising therefrom be quashed. 3. Since the parties have amicably settled all their disputes and the marriage of petitioner No.1 with the complainant has also been dissolved vide award dated 19.8.2007 passed by Lok Adalat under Section 21 of the Legal Services Authorities, no useful purpose would be served from continuing the criminal proceedings that were initiated by the complainant. In fact, continuance of criminal proceedings, despite settlement and despite their marriage having been dissolved, would be a hindrance in their leading rest of their life in a peaceful and congenial atmosphere. 4. Section 19(5) of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 reads a under:- “19.(5) A Lok Adalat shall have jurisdiction to determine and to arrive at a compromise or settlement between the parties to a dispute in respect of— (i) any case pending before; or (ii) any matter which is falling within the jurisdiction of, and is not brought before, Any court for which the Lok Adalat is organized: Crl.M.C. No. 4275/2009 Page 3 of 3 Provided that the Lok Adalat shall have no jurisdiction in respect of any case or matter relating to an offence no compoundable under any law.” 5. Section 21 of the Act provides that every award of Lok Adalat shall be deemed tobe a decree of the civil court or as the case may be, an order of any other court. It further provides that the award made by a Lok Adalat shall be final and binding on all the parties to the dispute and no appeal shall lie to any court against the award. 6. Considering the fact that the parties have amicably settled their disputes and both of them have accepted and acted upon the award passed by Lok Adalat, I need not, in this case, go into the question as to whether the award passed by the Lok Adalat dissolving the marriage by mutual consent is within the scope of the jurisdiction conferred upon it or not. 7. For the reasons given in the preceding paragraphs, FIR No.903/2006 lodged at PS Saraswati Vihar under Sections 498- A/406/34 IPC and the proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed. 8. The petition stands disposed of. (V.K.JAIN) JUDGE JANUARY 25, 2010 bg