mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6146 of 2008 Jayant Mahendra Gupta & ors. .. Petitioners versus M/s.Indian National Press & ors. .. Respondents ... Mr.Kishor S. Patil for the petitioner. Mr.K.A. Shah with D.Kumar for respondent no.1. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J DATED : 5th September 2008 P.C.: 1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. I find no basis to upset the logical view reached by the court below on applying the market price on the basis of ready reckoner. If the fair market value of the suit premises which is located in prime area is above Rs.60 lakhs, average returns should be atleast 10% of that value per annum and if that figure is to be divided in 12 equal monthly instalments, it would be around Rs.50,000/- per month. 3. There is no reason to depart from this view taken from the court below which is a possible view. Significantly, it is not the case of the petitioners that the petitioners have no source of income to pay the amount of Rs.50,000/- per month. In fact, the petitioners are engaged in business which is conducted from the suit premises, which are located in a prime commercial locality. Hence, no interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is warranted. Hence, dismissed. (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)