IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 26365 of 2001 Between: 1 Mr.Baddam Pratap Reddy S/o. Narsimha Reddy @ Narsaiah R/o. 17-1-383/112, A Vinaynagar, Saidabad, Hyderabad. 2 Mr.Baddam Janga Reddy S/o. Narsimha Reddy @ Narsaiah R/o. H.No.17-1-383/112 B, vinaynagar, Saidabad, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Mr.Baddam Venkat Reddy S/o. Narsaiah @ Narsimha Reddy R/o.2-95, Champapet, Saroornagar R.R.District. 2 Gurram Bal Reddy S/o. Buchi Reddy (Late), R/o. Champapet, Saroornagar, R.R.District. 3 Gurram Malla Reddy S/o. Guruvaiah, @ Guruva Reddy R/o. Champapet, Saroornagar, R.R.District. 4 The Superintending Engineer, AP TRANSCO R.R.District. 5 The Asst Divl. Engineer, AP TRANSCO, Saroornagar, R.R.District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction and more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the Respondent No.4 & 5 in not Considering the application of the petitioners herein in issuing a service connection or shifting the S.C.No.10 of Sy.No.102 of Karmanghat village, Ranga Reddy District, which is in joint possession is illegal, arbitrary, null and void and consequently direct the respondent No.4 & 5 not to issue the fresh service connection or shift the S.C.No.10 of Sy.No.102 situated at Karmanghat village, Ranga Reddy District. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.B.RAVINDRA NATH Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3:MR.D.PRATAP REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 & 5: V.AJAY KUMAR (SC FOR AP TRANSCO) The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondents 4 and 5 in not considering the objections of the petitioner as regards the Service Connection No.10 of Sy.No.102 situated at Karmanghat Village, Ranga Reddy Dsitrict, as illegal and arbitrary. This Court by an order dated 27.12.2001 directed the fifth respondent to consider the objections of the petitioner before passing final orders. In that view of the matter, the interim order dated 27.12.2001 shall be treated as final order in the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly closed. No order as to costs. ___________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 30.06.2005 DR To 1 The Superintending Engineer, AP TRANSCO R.R.District. 2 The Asst Divl. Engineer, AP TRANSCO, Saroornagar, R.R.District. 3 Two C.D. Copies. Form-NIC-OGS/WP{JPK}