1 W.P.No.369 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 369 OF 2008 The Dnyandan Shikshan Prasrak Mandal, Latur, through its Secretary ..PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Mah. & ors. ..RESPONDENTS Mr N.P. Patil - Jamalpurkar,Advocate for the petitioner; Mr K.B. Choudhari, A.G.P. for respondent no.1 CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE AND S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 16th March, 2011 PER COURT : The present petition has been filed against the order passed by respondent no.2 refusing permission to the petitioner to start a secondary school at Khani Vibhag Vaibhavnagar, Latur. It appears that the petitioner had filed the application before the authorities sometime in 2002. The application was rejected and, therefore, the petitioner was constrained to file Writ Petition No.7233 of 2006. The Division Bench of this Court on 14.6.2007 set aside the order as it showed apparent non application of mind. The respondents in the petition, which included respondent no.2 herein were granted liberty to pass appropriate orders within four weeks from the date of the order of this Court. 2 W.P.No.369 of 2008 2. It appears that the respondent no.2 has reiterated his earlier order and again without giving reasons. 3. The learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner states that the petitioner will submit a fresh proposal to the respondents for starting a secondary school, which the respondents should consider in accordance with law. He, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the petition. In our opinion, the suggestion of the learned Advocate for the petitioner is very fair. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to submit a fresh proposal for starting a secondary school at Khani Vibhag Vaibhavnagar, Latur. Petition dismissed as withdrawn. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) ( SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.) amj/wp369.08