IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.PADMANABHAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 2ND JULY 2007 / 11TH ASHADHA 1929 EFA.No. 23 of 1998() -------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 28/08/1997 IN I.A.2319/96 IN I.A.512 OF 1996 IN MVOP.720/1988 of MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, THRISSUR. .................... APPELLANT: ----------- SARADA, W/O.KUNDAYI SANKARA NARAYANAN & D/O. THOTTUPPARA CHATHUNNY, NATTIKA DESOM & VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.D.SOMASUNDARAM RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. RAMU @ RAMACHANDRAN, PARAPPILLY VARANAMKADATH HOUSE, AYYANTHOLE P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. SANKARANARAYANAN, S/O.KUNDAYI SANKARAN NATTIKA DESOM & VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.ASHOKAN THIS EXECUTION FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------- E.F.A.No. 23 of 1998 ------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd July, 2007. J U D G M E N T When the appeal came for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the Village Officer had issued a certificate stating that the entire amount due under the award passed in M.V.(O.P.)No.720/1988 was deposited by the second respondent in this appeal. If the amount had been deposited, there is no need to proceed with the attachment and sale of the property. So, the appeal has become infructuous. In the result, the appeal is closed as infructuous. K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, JUDGE nj. K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------- E.F.A.No. 23 of 1998 J U D G M E N T Dated: 2nd July, 2007. -------------------------------