IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS THURSDAY, THE 22ND SEPTEMBER 2011 / 31ST BHADRA 1933 WP(Crl.).No. 423 of 2011(S) --------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- 1. RAJ BINU, S/O.THAYAGARAJAN, PUTHEN VEEDU,V.V.CLINIC ROAD,ATTINGAL PIN 695 101. 2. SUNDERASAN, S/O.KRISHNAN, PUTHEN VEEDU,V.V.CLINIC ROAD,ATTINGAL. 3. SUJATHA,W/O. SUNDARESAN PUTHEN VEEDU,V.V.CLINIC ROAD,ATTINGAL. BY ADV. SRI.M.R.RAJESH RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT POLICE CHEIF, P.M.G., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE OF THE DY.SP., ATTINGAL - PIN 695 101. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE ATTINGAL POLICE STATION, ATTINGAL PIN 695 101. 4. TAHA , PANAYIL PUTHEN VEEDU CHOORODU, MANNOORBHAGOM, ALAMCODE ,ATTINGAL. 5. PRAMOD KUMAR @ UNNI, S/O.RAJAPPAN NAIR KONATHYVILAKOM VEEDU, BEHIND IOC PETROL PUMP, OPPOSITE TOWN HALL, ATTINGAL- PIN 695 101. W.P.(CRL).NO.423 OF 2011 S 6. NISA, PANAYIL PUTHEN VEEDU CHOORODU, MANNOORBHAGOM, ALAMCODE, ATTINGAL. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI S. DILIP. R4 & R6 BY ADVOCATE SHRI ARUN THOMAS. ADVOCATE SRI.K.B.PRADEEP FOR R5 ADVOCATE SMT.N.G.SINDHU FOR R5 THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.(CRL).NO.423 OF 2011 S PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE FIR NO.1265/2011 DATED 25.08.2011 OF THE ATTINGAL POLICE STATION. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 29.08.2011 GIVEN BY SHRUTHI TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 30.08.2011 GIVEN BY THE 1ST PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINTDATED 01.09.2011 GIVEN BY THE 1ST PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. // TRUE COPY// PS TO JUDGE K.M. JOSEPH & M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ----------------------------------------- W.P.(CRL).NO. 423 OF 2011 S ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 22nd September, 2011 JUDGMENT K.M. Joseph, J. This is a Writ Petition filed by the husband and parents of the alleged detenue by name Ninu. Essentially, allegation of illegal detention is made against respondents 4 to 6. 2. Today, the alleged detenue is present. We interacted with her. We interacted with the petitioners and the fourth respondent. We also interacted with the sixth respondent. 3. The alleged detenue would state that there is no illegal detention and she went on her own. She would in fact say that she has filed a petition for divorce. The third petitioner who is the mother of the alleged detenue would point out that the alleged detenue has taken away her ornaments. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that money and ornaments belonging to W.P.(CRL).NO.423 OF 2011 S 2 the family members were taken away by the alleged detenue. In fact, the alleged detenue would say that she has taken only her ornaments. The petitioners are anyway not prepared to take the alleged detenue with them. In such circumstances, we close the Writ Petition. Sd/= K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE Sd/= M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JUDGE kbk. //True Copy//