WP(C) 6807/2003 BEFORE THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. Goswami, learned Standing Counsel, ASEB and Mr. B. K. Purkayastha, lea rned counsel for respondent No.5. They submitted that the writ petition is not m aintainable. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dted 11. 7.2003 passed by the District Consumer Forum, Cachar, Silchar. Admittedly, as pe r the statutory provisions, appeal lies against the impugned order. While it is true that there cannot be any absolute bar in invoking the writ jurisdiction bu t normally the Writ Court will be reluctant to entertain the writ petition, in c ase of availability of alternative remedy. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed with the liberty to the petitioner pursue such legal remedy as may be available in law.