IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 29TH MARCH 2010 / 8TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 8133 of 2010(N) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ HASSEBA HASSAN, D/O. HASSAN, HERITAGE APARTMENTS, 43/2722-A, SRM ROAD, ERNAKULAM-682 018. BY ADV. SMT.K.A.ANGEL TREENA SMT.ARLISS TRENCY ANTONY RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENHIPALAM, KOZHIKODE-673 635. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENHIPALAM, KOZHIKODE-673 635. 3. THE PRINCIPAL, NEHRU COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH CENTRE, PAMPADY, THIRUVILWAMALA, THRISSUR-682 597. R1 & R2 BY ADV. MR.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, CALICUT UTY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.8133 of 2010 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of March, 2010 JUDGMENT The main prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to complete the process of revaluation and allow scrutiny results of B.Tech (IT) first and second semester ENO4 106(A) Engineering Graphics paper. 2. The learned Standing Counsel for the University submitted that the revaluation is already over and communication was issued to the petitioner dated 22/10/2009. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not so far been issued with any copy of the communication. With regard to the request to allow the scrutiny of answer paper also the petitioner was directed to meet Controller of Examination within a period of 15 days from the date of memo. 3. Since the petitioner has not received any communication so far, there will be a direction to the University to communicate the result of revaluation immediately. The petitioner will approach the University thereafter. It is further submitted by the learned Standing WPC.No.8133 of 2010 : 2 : Counsel that the photocopy of the answer script cannot be issued since it is by pencil drawing. It is also submitted that there is an enhancement in the marks after the revaluation. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. (T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) skj