WP(C) 2130/2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. C. UPADHYAY (Ranjan Gogoi,J.) Heard Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. P. S. Deka, lea rned Govt. Advocate, Assam. The petitioners, who are the members of the same family, complain of harassment, intimidation and annoyance by the respondent Nos.5, 6, 7 and 8 in connivance wi th the personnel of North Guwahati Police Station, the Officer-in-charge of whic h Police Station has been impleaded as Respondent No.4 in the present case. Acco rdingly appropriate intervention of this Court has been prayed for. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that after the interim order d ated 29.5.2009 was rendered in the present case except for one or two minor alte rcations no untoward incident had happened and there has been no threat, annoyan ce or intimidation either by the Respondent Nos.5 to 8 or by the personnel of th e North Guwahati Police Station. The aforesaid statement made by the learned cou nsel for the petitioners makes it unnecessary on our part to embark upon a detai led recital of the various incidents of threat, intimidation and annoyance spelt out by the petitioners in the present writ petition and the counter statements made by the respondent No.3 in his affidavit dated 22.6.2009. Instead, taking in to account the situation prevailing, as on date, we deem it appropriate to close the writ petition with the direction that the respondents shall not interfere w ith the life, liberty and property of the petitioners except in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law. In the event the petitioners are in any manner threatened or intimidated by the respondents or any of them it will be open for them to bring such facts to the notice of the Court. The Writ Petition shall stand disposed of in the above terms.