IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 14TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 25TH MAGHA 1929 RP.No. 292 of 2007 ------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN CRP.2295/1997 Dated 28/08/2006 ............................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/LEGAL HEIRS OF THE DECEASED --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. T.K.MOHAMMED KUNHANI, S/O.LATE PATHUMMA, THODUKUZHIKUNNUMMEL HOUSE, P.O. EDAPPATTA, MELATTUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. T.K.ABOOBACKER SIDDIQUE, S/O.LATE PATHUMMA, THODUKUZHIKKUNNUMEL HOUSE, P.O.EDAPPATTA, MELATTUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. T.K.KUNJATHU, D/O.LATE PATHUMMA, THODUKUZHIKKUNNUMMEL HOUSE, P.O.EDAPPATTA, MELATTUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. T.K.JAMEELA, D/O.LATE PATHUMMA, THODUKUZHIKKUNNUMMEL HOUSE, P.O.EDAPPATTA, MELATTUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 5. T.K.AMEENA, D/O.LATE PATHUMMA, THODUKUZHIKKUNNUMMEL HOUSE, PO.EDAPPATTA, MELATTUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 6. T.K.RAMLATH, D/O.LATE PATHUMMA, THODUKUZHIKKUNNUMMEL HOUSE, P.O.EDAPPATTA, MELATTUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. (SONS & DAUGHTERS OF LATE PATHUMMA, THE REVISION PETITIONER SINCE DIED) BY ADV. SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SR.) SRI.S.SUJIN RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS ---------------------------------------------- 1. THE TALUK LAND BOARD, PERINTHLMANNA. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, PERINTHALMANNA. R.P. NO. 292/2007 3. STATE OF KERALA - REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. T.K.CHERIA AHAMEDKUTTY, EDAPETTA, PERINTHALMANNA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. R.BINDHU THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/02/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.KRISHNAN, J. --------------------------- R.P.No.292 OF 2007 IN C.R.P.No.2295 OF 1999 -------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of February, 2008 O R D E R ~~~~~~~ This review petition is preferred against the judgment of this court dated 28.8.2006. The principal contention is that the revision petitioner in the case died on 27.3.2004 and without the legal heirs on record, the matter has been disposed of or in other words a judgment is passed against a dead person. Therefore, necessarily the judgment suffers from infirmity. Therefore, the judgment dated 28.8.2006 is reviewed and reposted for further steps and hearing. Post the civil revision petition after two weeks. (M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE) ps