IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD CRIMINAL PETITION NO.7445 OF 2009 Between: Gangidi Rajashekar Reddy. ..... PETITIONER. AND The State of A.P., Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad and another. ..... RESPONDENTS. CRIMINAL PETITION NO.7819 OF 2009 Between: Gangidi Srinivasa Reddy and another. ..... PETITIONERS. AND The State of A.P., Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad and another. ..... RESPONDENTS. Petitions under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C. No.30 of 2009, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class Shadnagar. These Petitions coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. PARSA ANANTH NAGESWAR RAO, Advocate for the Petitioner/s and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the first respondent, the Court made the following: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD CRIMINAL PETITION NOs.7445 AND 7819 OF 2009 ORDER: The Petitioners in both the petitions and the second respondent in both the petitions are present in person and they are identified by Sri P. Ananth Nageswar Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioners in both the petitions. The second respondent in both the petitions is the de-facto complainant and victim. She stated before the Court that, she compromised the matter with the accused/petitioners and hence, further Criminal proceedings may be quashed. The petitioners also stated that they compromised the matter with the second respondent and hence, the Criminal proceedings may be quashed. The disputes are purely personal in nature and no public policy is involved. As the matter is compromised, any continuance of the case will be a futile exercise. The vexing litigation has to be put an end by invoking the inherent jurisdiction. Therefore, the further proceedings in C.C. No.30 of 2009 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Shadnagar are quashed and both the Criminal petitions are allowed. The parties are informed. ____________________ G.BHAVANI PRASAD, J Date: 22-09-2009. Dsh.