IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DECEMBER 2009 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 35531 of 2009(J) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- G.PRABHAKARAN NAIR, SOUPARNIK, VANDANNOOR, PERUMPAZHUTHOOR.P.O. WORKING AS GROUP INSTRUCTOR ITI,CHACKAI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. MR.D.AJITHKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PERSONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF TRAINING INDUSTRIAL TRAINING DEPARTMENT, THYCAUD.PO., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE JOINT DIRECTOR, INDUSTRIAL TRAINING DEPARTMENT, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE PRINCIPAL, ITI, CHACKAI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. SUNIL KUMAR, GROUP INSTRUCTOR, GOVERNMENT ITI, RAJAKKAD, IDUKKI DISTRICT. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.ANU SIVARAMAA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P.(C) No. 35531 of 2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this the 9th day of December, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioner is a Group Instructor in I.T.I. By Ext.P4 order dated 15-9- 2009 he was transferred from Dhanuvachapuram I.T.I. and was posted at Chackai I.T.I. While continuing at there, by Ext.P8 order dated 1-12-2009 he has been transferred and posted to Rajakkad I.T.I. and the fifth respondent has been transferred and posted in his place. It is aggrieved by this transfer, this writ petition is filed. 2. Now that the petitioner has been relieved from Chckai I.T.I. he has to join at the transferred place. 3. It is also noticed that by Ext.P9 representation filed by the petitioner before the first respondent he has sought cancellation of Ext.P8 itself. 3. Having regard to the pendency of such representation, I dispose of this writ petition directing the first respondent to consider Ext.P9 representation and pass orders thereon. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Needless to say that order as above shall be passed with notice to the petitioner and the fifth respondent. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. mn.