IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40777 of 2008 BABITA DEVI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. LAXMAN PRASAD SAH 3. JAGDISH PRASAD 4. MEERA SAH ----------- 2/ 22/10/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. In this application for cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to the husband in a complaint case under Section-498A of I.P.C., the submission is that the compromise had fallen through and that the O.Ps. were not cooperating with the trial taking advantage of the anticipatory bail granted to them. That cannot be a ground by itself to cancel the anticipatory bail granted. If the private O.Ps. are not cooperating in the trial and abstaining, the petitioner has adequate remedies available to her before the court below and the court below has ample powers in law to secure their attendance. Let recourse be had to the same in accordance with law so that the trial is concluded expeditiously, preferably within 10 months. KC ( Navin Sinha, J )