{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9939 OF 2010 Dagduba s/o Haribhau Vidhate Petitioner Versus The State Election Commission and another Respondents Mr.H.V.Patil, advocate for petitioner Mr.S.T.Shelke, advocate for respondents CORAM : R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 22nd October, 2010 PER COURT: 1 The grievance raised by petitioner in the petition is in respect of acceptance of nomination paper from ward no.3. 2 It is contended that petitioner intended to contest election from ward no.2, however, the Returning Officer, with mala fide intention, in connivance with others, has made corrections in the nomination paper as well as annexures presented along with nomination paper and substituted the figure and word “3” (“three”) in stead of “2” (“two”) and thereby accepted nomination paper from ward no.3. 3 The grievance made by petitioner needs some fact finding inquiry which can be done only in a properly constituted {2} election petition. The petitioner has liberty to present Election Petition as provided by the Statute. In exercise of powers conferred on this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution, no interference is called for. 4 Writ Petition stands rejected with liberty as prayed for. R.M.BORDE JUDGE adb/wp993910