C-482 No. 1161 of 2010 Hon’ble Nirmal Yadav, J. Mr. Shashi Kant Shandilya, learned counsel for petitioner. Mr. S.S. Adhikari, learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand. Learned counsel for the applicant states that vide order dated 8th November 2010 the learned Additional Sessions Judge, /6th F.T.C. Dehradun had directed that complaint case as well as State case against the applicant be decided together. The order was received by the learned Special Judicial Magistrate (C.B.I.), Dehradun on 9th October 2010. On 10th November 2010 an application of exemption for appearance was moved by the applicant in the State case, which was allowed. However, in the complaint case the trial court has issued bailable warrants against the petitioner. It is argued that since both the cases were ordered to be tried together, no warrants could be issued against the petitioner in the complaint case. Taking into consideration the overall aspect of the matter and the fact that both the cases were clubbed together and exemption was granted in the State case, the petitioner was entitled to exempt in the complaint case also. Thus the order dated 10th November 2010 issuing bailable warrants could not have been passed by the learned Magistrate, Dehradun. Accordingly order dated 10.11.2010 issuing bailable warrants of arrest of petitioner is set aside. Petitioner is directed to appear on the next date of hearing before the trial court. The C-482 application is disposed of at the admission stage. (Nirmal Yadav, J.) VKG 01.12.2010