IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED WRIT PETITION NO : 10478 of 1995 Between: 1 N.Eayumalai Reddy S/o.Muneppa Reddy R/o.Vedam Mitakandriga Upanishadvahur (PO) Srikalahasthi Mandal Chittoor Dist 2 T.Venkata Prasad S/o.T.Sreenivasulu R/o.4-212,Bodibamitta,Srikalahsthi (PO & M) Chittoor Dist. 3 N.Ramachandra S/o.Govinda Reddy R/o.17-85,Panagal Post Srikalahasthi Mandal Chittoor Dist 4 Subramanyam S/o.G.Munirathnam R/o.D.No.6-11-127,Channa Reddy Colony Tirupathi Chittoor Dist. 5 I.Krishna Reddy S/o.Ramachandra Reddy R/o.Beripalle village Chitipiralla Post Puthalpattu Mandal Chittoor Dist. 6 P.Sudhakara Reddy S/o.P.Kesava Reddy R/o.Narayana Reddy Palli Village Venuthanapalli Post Puthalapattu Mandal Chittoor Dist. 7 K.Hemadri S/o.Lakshmaiah Chetty R/.Kutamyaripalli Village Puthalapatta Mandal Chittoor Dist. ....PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Dist Employment Officer Chittoor Dist Chittoor. 2 The Executive Officer Tirumala Tirupathi Devastanam Tirupathi Chittoor Dist. ..RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in ignoring the petitioners to call for interviews for the posts of Attenders in the 2nd respondent Devasthanam, is illegal, arbitrary and untenable and further declare that calling some of the juniors of the petitioners for the interviews for the posts of Attenders, ignoring the petitioners is violative of Art.14 of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to do justice to the petitioners. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.R.SANKU Counsel for the Respondent No.1.: GP FOR EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Mr.A..Jaya Prakash Rao, Standing Counsel for T.T.D. The Court made the following : ORDER It is represented by Mr.K.Neelakanteswara Rao, Advocate for Mr.S.R.Sanku, counsel appearing for the petitioners that the cause in this writ petition has become in fructuous. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. -------------------- 28.10.2004 Hsd Assistant Registrar // true copy // Section Officer To, 1 The Dist Employment Officer Chittoor Dist Chittoor. 2 The Executive Officer Tirumala Tirupathi Devastanam Tirupathi Chittoor Dist. 3. 2 CCs to G.P. for Emplyment and Training, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 4. 2 C.D. copies