IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1982 of 2011 RAJENDRA BHUSHAN MAUAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 19.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Ara Town P.S. Case No. 413 of 2009 registered under Sections 304B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara. Though, there is general accusation of demand of dowry and torture against the entire in-laws family, but, it appears from the impugned order that the victim's daughter levelled accusation of assault against the petitioner and other family members. It is further submitted that the father-in-law with similar accusation has been granted regular bail by the learned court below. I see no reason for the learned court below not to give the same privilege to the petitioner. Let the learned court below consider the 2 regular bail application of the petitioner if the petitioner surrenders within a period of four weeks considering the fact that from the own admission of the informant in the First Information Report, the case does not come within the purview of Section 304B of the I.P.C. With the above observation, this application is, accordingly, disposed off. Let the order be transmitted to the learned court below through fax at the cost of the petitioner. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)