IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 3RD APRIL 2009 / 13TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 10173 of 2009(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- K.R. DILEEPKUMAR, S/O.LAGE T.V. RAGHAVAN, 55 YEARS, DILEEP SADANAM, KANICHUKKULANGARA, H. NO. 71257, CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.EAPEN MATHAI SRI.S.G.MADHUSOODANAN SMT.A.R.USHA SMT.HELAN EARNEST RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KERALA FOR REGISTRATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. I.G OF REGISTRATION, KERALA STATE, VANCHIYOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. SUB REGISTRAR, MARARIKKULAM. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 10173 OF 2009 (N) ===================== Dated this the 3rd day of April, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner's grievance is regarding the alleged refusal on the part of the 3rd respondent to register Ext.P1 document of sale executed by the petitioner. 2. Several cases of this nature has been disposed of by this Court directing that if a document is presented for registration, the Registering Authority is expected to take steps for its registration and thereafter if necessary, take further steps as is warranted in accordance with law. 3. Consistent with the above, this writ petition is also disposed of directing that it will be open to the petitioner to present the original of Ext.P1 before the 3rd respondent, in which event, the 3rd respondent shall take necessary steps for its registration and thereafter if circumstances justify to take further action in accordance with law. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 3rd respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp