Crl. Misc. No. M-778 of 2009 Akbar and another vs. State of Haryana Present: Mr.Navneet Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Sidharth Sarup, AAG, Haryana. **** The following order was passed by this Court on 17.2.2009:- “Learned State counsel has submitted that Niyamat-petitioner No.2 has been arrested on 2.2.2009. Accordingly, petition qua petitioner No.2 is dismissed as infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner requests for an adjournment. List again on 27.4.2009. In the meantime, in the event of arrest, petitioner No.1 be admitted to interim bail subject to his furnishing personal bonds and surety to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. However, he shall join the investigation as and when called and shall abide by the provisions of Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.” Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Rajinder Singh, has submitted that petitioner No.1-Akbar has joined investigation and is not required for further investigation. Accordingly, this petition is allowed and the order granting interim bail dated 17.2.2009 is made absolute. (SABINA) JUDGE April 27, 2009 anita