IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 13TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 22ND KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 33412 of 2008(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SILPA V.SUDHAN, VADIKKEITTLY HOUSE, VALAPPAD BEACH, THRISSUR. (REGISTRATION NO.826286, FINAL YEAR B.COM WITH COMPUTER APPLICATION, JNANA DEEPA VIDYA PEEDAM, KIDS ITC, KOTTAPPURAM). BY ADV. SRI.K.B.GANGESH SMT.SMITHA CHATHANARAMBATH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. M.G.UNIVERSITY REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, M.G.UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM. BY SC T.A.SHAJI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).33412/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 13th day of November, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner has completed her Course in B.Com with Computer Application from Jnana Deepa Vidya Peedam, Kottapuram, affiliated to Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam. Apparently, dissatisfied with the marks obtained in one paper, in the final year B.Com with Computer Application held in April/May, 2008, she had applied for revaluation. She is aggrieved that the result of the revaluation has not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of the final year B.Com with Computer Application Degree Examination held in April/May, 2008. Ext.P2 application for revaluation is pending before the respondents. W.P.(C).33412/2008 2 3. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to publish the results of the revaluation sought for by the petitioner in relation to the final year B.Com with Computer Application, Degree Examination held in April/May, 2008, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment provided the application for revaluation is in order and otherwise correct. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs