IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33351 of 2010 MD.SHAHABUDDIN, SON OF MD. S.M. HABIBULLAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PRATAPPUR, POLICE STATION HUSSAINGANJ, DISTRICT SIWAN. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 21.9.2010. This is the second attempt for grant of bail before this Court. Earlier by order dated 5.3.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No.37132 of 2009, the prayer for bail of this petitioner was rejected, keeping in view the fact that in the present case, two sons of informant were kidnapped and they were traceless till the date of hearing of earlier bail application, coupled with the fact that there were number of cases against the petitioner. Keeping in view the antecedents of this petitioner as well as the fact indicated above, prayer for bail of this petitioner was rejected. It appears that after the rejection of bail by this Court, the petitioner approached Hon’ble Supreme Court by way of filing an appeal vide Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No.2799 of 2010, which was dismissed on 9.4.2010. Even after rejection of his bail by Hon’ble Supreme Court, again the petitioner approached the 2 trial court with a view to grant bail on number of grounds. However, the learned trial Judge, by its order dated 27.8.2010, has rejected the prayer for bail and thereafter, the present petition has been filed. While pressing the present bail petition, Shri Shakil Ahmad Khan, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submits that from the impugned order i.e. order dated 27.8.2010, it is evident that the prosecution is not interested in conclusion of the trial and due to that reason, frivolous petitions are being filed by the prosecution with a view to delay the conclusion of the trial. Learned counsel for the petitioner has reiterated the same argument, which was earlier advanced. Keeping in view the fact that the prayer for bail of this petitioner has already been rejected by Hon’ble Supreme Court, to maintain judicial discipline, it would not be appropriate to entertain the present petition for bail filed by the petitioner. However, keeping in view the fact that petitioner is in custody and charges have also been framed on 4.6.2010, it is 3 N.H./ desirable to observe that trial court may take steps so that the case may come to a logical end without delay. With above observation and direction, the petition stands rejected. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)