1 38 caf.55.10 ors ndm FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 55 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 828 OF 2004 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. Sachin Chavan i/b Mr. Shriram S. Kulkarni for the Applicants. Mr. Ajay Varma i/b Mr. Harshad E. Palwe for the Respondents. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 01 st March, 2011. P.C. Considering the pendency of the very old appeals in this Court, no priority can be given to the appeals of the year 2004 as of today. Hence, application is rejected. [ A.S.OKA, J ] 2 38 caf.55.10 ors ndm FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2807 OF 2004 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 828 OF 2004 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. Ajay Varma i/b Mr. Harshad E. Palwe for the Applicants. Mr. Sachin Chavan i/b Mr. Shriram S. Kulkarni for the Respondents. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 01 st March, 2011. P.C. Compliance has been made with the ad-interim order by the Applicants. Hence, ad-interim relief granted on 27 th October, 2004 shall continue to operate as interim relief. Application is disposed of. [ A.S.OKA, J ] 3 38 caf.55.10 ors ndm FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3628 OF 2005 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 828 OF 2004 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. Sachin Chavan i/b Mr. Shriram S. Kulkarni for the Applicants. Mr. Ajay Varma i/b Mr. Harshad E. Palwe for the Respondents. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 01 st March, 2011. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Applicants and the learned counsel appearing for the Respondents. 2 Permission deserves to be granted to the Applicants to withdraw the amount subject to furnishing security. Hence, application is disposed of by passing the following order: “Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). However, withdrawal of the amount by the Applicants will be permitted only after furnishing security for the entire decretal amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.” [ A.S.OKA, J ]