IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w p [3%) No L$w /2o1o PETITIONER f Smt. Ketakl Gupta W/o Shri 1a11aJ1 Gupta, aged about 68 «4 years, R/o Rest House Road Pendra Road, District Bilaspur C.G. VERSUS RESPONDENT Reglonal Transport Authority, through the Secretary, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur C.G. K z 125,22? WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATU RE OF MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION/ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC ‘E? ” _ s aw % v HIGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 2549 of 2010 Respondent Petitioner Smt. Ketaki Gupta Versus Regional Transport Authority WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agni‘notri, J.) Present :- Shri Rakesh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent. ORDER ORAL (Passed o'n 17' Day of June, 2010) ’ Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made an application for grant of temporary permit on 17l04/20‘IO for a period from 01 /04/201O to 30/06/201 0. NO order has been passed on the said application and as such, the application has become infructuous by non action of the respondent authority. Be that as it may since the period is Iikeiy to come to an end; liberty is granted to the petitioner-to make a fresh application for grant of temporary permit, if so advised. ln the event, the application is made, the same shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law, as early as possible preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of making the application. Accordingly} the writ petition is disposed of. / <7 Arun