IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38299 of 2010 SUNITA DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 07. 30.03.2011 The O.P. No.2 was granted anticipatory bail in complaint case No. 2716 of 2009, in which cognizance has been taken on under Section 498A of the I.P.C. and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. On 09.08.2010 O.P. No.2 the husband was granted anticipatory bail with the undertaking that he will go to the petitioner’s house and bring her back to her matrimonial house within a period of four weeks. It appears that the O.P. No.2 violated the undertaking given before this Court which resulted in the filing of the present application. It appears that on 03.11.2010 the counsel for O.P. No.2 prays for four week’s time for appearance of O.P. No.2 when the matter was adjourned to 15.12.2010 with a direction to appear before this Court in person. The order dated 05.01.2011 reflects that O.P. No.2 did not appear but his counsel 2 submitted that he is ready for reconciliation. The order dated 19.01.2011 reflects that again O.P. No.2 did not appear but his counsel submits that he is ready to resume the conjugal life then he was directed to appear on 28th February 2011. On 28.02.2011 also the O.P. No.2 did not choose to appear then the matter was fixed for 15th March 2011. On 15th March 2011 also O.P. No.2 did not choose to appear then the matter was fixed for 30th March 2011 as last indulgence. It appears that even today neither O.P. No.2 nor his counsel are appearing. Considering the conduct of the O.P. No.2, the anticipatory bail granted to O.P. No. 2 Pappu Kumar vide order dated 09.08.210 in Complaint Case No. 2716 of 2009 is hereby cancelled. Let this order be transmitted to the learned S.D.J.M., East Muzaffarpur to take all the steps for the arrest of O.P. No.2 forthwith. Mkr. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)