CRM-M NO.31886 of 2011 (O&M) --1-- IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M NO.31886 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 31.10.2011 Harpreet Kaur .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present:- Mr. AS Virk, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. SS Gill, DAG, Punjab. ---- Ajay Tewari, J.(Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.200 dated 23.09.2011, registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of Indian Penal Code at Police Station Jodhewal, District Ludhiana. On 19.10.2011, the following contention was noticed:- “Learned counsel has argued that the falsity of the FIR can be gazed by the fact that the complainant himself sold the house to Sudesh Rani and it is his photograph which has appeared on the registered sale deed.” Learned Deputy Advocate General on instructions CRM-M NO.31886 of 2011 (O&M) --2-- from ASI Sukhwinder Singh states that this argument is incorrect and the photograph of the complainant does not appear on the registered sale deed. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in any case the main accused is the husband of the petitioner who is in custody. Learned Deputy Advocate General has accepted this fact. In this view of the matter and the petitioner being lady, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Let the petitioner appear before the Investigating Officer on 09.11.2011 between 10:00 AM and 4:00 PM and on any other date on which her presence is required by the Investigating Officer. The Investigating Officer shall released him on bail to his satisfaction subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE 31.10.2011 sonika