IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 26TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 7TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 6302 of 2009(G) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- RAJAN M.K. S/O.KUMARAN, ALINGAPOKKATH HOUSE, THATHAPPILLY P.O, NORTH PARAVUR. BY ADV. SRI.LIJU. M.P SRI.VARADARAJ RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE TALUK SURVEYOR, TALUK SURVEY DEPARTMENT, PARAVUR TALUK OFFICE, NORTH PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE TAHASILDAR, PARAVUR TALUK, NORTH PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM. GOVT.PLEADER SMT.SUDHADEVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 6302 OF 2009 (G) ==================== Dated this the 26th day of February, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner states that he made an application to the 1st respondent for issuing a sketch and plan of his property. Complaining of delay in considering the application, he approached this Court by filing WP(C) No.1626/09 and that writ petition was disposed of by Ext.P1 judgment directing that orders shall be passed on an expeditious basis. Petitioner states that thereafter the 1st respondent has visited his property and by Ext.P4, he was also called upon to produce certain documents. It is stated that those documents were also produced. The complaint is that despite all this, sketch and plan have not been issued so far. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, the property has been measured and the petitioner has also complied with the requirements of Ext.P4, I direct that the respondents shall pass orders for the issue of sketch and plan on the application made by the petitioner. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 2 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp