IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 839 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 839 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 839 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 615 OF 2001 WRIT PETITION NO. 615 OF 2001 WRIT PETITION NO. 615 OF 2001 Mr. Mubarak Mehboob Shaikh ... Applicant V/s Ramchandra Krishnarao Kharadkar ... Respondent Mr. Uday Warunjikar for the applicant. CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. DATED: 27TH APRIL, 2006 DATED: 27TH APRIL, 2006 DATED: 27TH APRIL, 2006 Mentioned. Not on board. P.C. P.C. P.C.: 1. Heard advocate for the petitioner. The advocate for the respondent not present. However, in view of the facts and circumstances, and in view of the relief claimed, I do not see any reason that advocate for the respondent need be heard. 2. By order dated 15.2.2006 passed in Civil Application No. 2631 of 2005, the applicant was allowed to carry out the repairs to the extent of expenses of Rs.25,000/- and it was further directed that after the repairs are completed within a period of four weeks, accounts shall 2 be furnished by the applicant for perusal. 3. Today, it is submitted that the applicant was ill during the said period which aspect is supported by the medical certificates vide pages 11 and 12 which show that the applicant was admitted as in-door patient in two hospitals. Under the circumstances, the time to get the repairs completed is extended by four weeks from today. With this direction, the application stands disposed of with no order as to costs. .....