IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3977 of 2010 Baikunth Bihari Mishra, Son of Late Badri Narayan Mishra, R/o-vill.-Sonar, P.S.-Riga, District-Sitamarhi. –Petitioner. VERSUS 1. The Champaran Kashetriya Gramin Bank through its Chairman, Head office- Motihari, Red Cross Building, Hospital Road, Motihari, District-East Champaran, now Uttar Gramin Bank, Head Office-Muzaffarpur. 2. The Board of Directors, Champaran Kashetriya Gramin Bank through its Chairman, Head office-Motihari, Red Cross Building, Hospital Road, Motihari, District-East Champaran, now Uttar Gramin Bank, Head Office- Muzaffarpur. 3. Shri Prakash Narain Awasthi, Chairman-cum-Disciplinary Authority, Champaran Kashetriya Gramin Bank through its Chairman, Head office- Motihari, Red Cross Building, Hospital Road, Motihari, District-East Champaran. 4. Shri Prabhunth Singh, Area Manager-cum-Inquiry Officer, Champaran Kashetriya Gramin Bank, Bettiah Branch, Bettiah, District-West Champaran. -Respondents. ----------- 02 06.04.2011 By this modification application learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to reargue the case on the ground that there were certain other major issues as taken in the writ petition which have not been noticed in the order. In my view, the order is passed upon what all that was argued in the Court and the order was also dictated in presence of parties in the Court. At that time, it was never argued that petitioner was interested in adjudication on some other issues. That being so, if petitioner is aggrieved by order of this Court his remedy would be anything but not a modification application which requires virtually rehearing of the writ petition. This application is misconceived and dismissed as such. Trivedi/ (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)