IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 17732 of 2007 Between: St. Mary's Engineering College, deshmukhi Village, Pochampally Mandal, Nalgonda District, repby its Correspondent, Rev. K.V.K. Rao. C.T.amended as per courrt order dated 28.08.07 in wpmp 23422/07. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee for Regulatingthe Admissionin Privat eUn-Aided Professional Colleges, (Formerly the Committee to Oversee Conduct of CETs by the Associationof Private Un-aided Professional Colleges and Allied Matters) 1st Floor (south Wing), Gangan Vihar, MJ Road, Hyderabad, rep by Member Secretary/ 2 The A.P State Council of Higher Education, rep by its Secretary, Mahavir Marg, Masah Tank, Hyderabad, 3 jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Kukatpally, Hyderabad-72 rep by its Registrar,. 4 Convenor, EAMCET-Ac, C/o SWII Window, 401, Srinivasa apartments 866, 6th Street, Humayun Nagar, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent NO.1 in not accepting the option dated 31.7-2007 submitted by the petitioner to allot students under SWII mode for the Engineering programs in the Academic year 20007-2008 as arbitrary, illegal and offending Article 14 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the Respondents No.1 and 4 to allot students to the petitioner college through SWII mode of counseling for Engineering Courses in the Counseling session to be notified for such SWII made by the 4th respondent and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.SRI RAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: C.SUDESH ANAND(SC FOR APSCHE) The Court made the following : ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in this writ petition does not survive for adjudication and it has become infructuous. Recording the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. __________ 13-08-2008 rkk