:1: appp.589.11 ata IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.589 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.551 OF 2011 Mr. Bakhedu Rajwanta Yadav ..Applicant vs The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr. C. K. Talekar,for Applicant Mr. K. V. Saste,APP for State. CORAM :- A. M. THIPSAY, J. DATE :- OCTOBER 21, 2011 P. C. Heard. 2 The applicant was granted bail((Bail Application No.551 of 2011 decided on 14th June, 2011). The bail amount was fixed at that time as Rs.60,000/- On the applicant’s application for reduction of the said amount, bail amount was reduced to Rs.40,000/- The applicant was given option to furnish two sureties and a further option to deposit cash in lieu of any one surety of Rs.20,000/- The said order was further modified by order dated 3rd August, 2011(Criminal Application No.337 of 2011) and the applicant was given a further option to furnish four sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each. :2: appp.589.11 3 Mr. Talekar, the learned Advocate for the applicant now submits that the applicant has been able to offer only one surety in the sum of Rs. 10,000/-. He submitted that the applicant had in fact offered three more sureties, but the Sessions Court did not accept those sureties. 4 Under the circumstance, the applicant is allowed to deposit cash of Rs.30,000/- in addition to the surety in the sum of Rs. 10,000/-, that has been furnished by him, so as to make up the bail amount. 5 The application is, disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (A. M. THIPSAY , J.)