IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 19289 of 2002 BETWEEN: Balusu Uma Maheswari W/o Late Balusu Shivasankara Rao R/o. H.No.7/95, Nidamanur Village, Vijayawada Rural Mandal, Krishna District. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Police, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2 The Sub-Inspector of Police, Penamaluru Police Station, Penamaluru Mandal, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 3 B. Prathima, D/o Aravapalli Krishna Rao, R/o. D.No. 4-90, Penamaluru Village & Mandal, Vijayawada Rural, Krishna District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in harassing the petitioner without any complaint by calling the mediators on behalf of the petitioner for settlement of money, as illegal, arbitrary and against Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 1 & 2 herein not to call the petitioner or her relatives to their offices without there being any case lodged by the 3rd Respondent for purpose of settlement or any other purpose except in accordance with law and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.J.U.M.V.PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents 1 & 2: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petitioner is no more, therefore, the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the above submission, the writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J April 2, 2008 DSK