IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 13TH OCTOBER 2008 / 21ST ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 29662 of 2008(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- P.K.RAVEENDRAN, S/O.KUMARAN, PALAKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, P.O.PANANGAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.S.MOHAMMED AL RAFI RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. TODDY WORKERS WELFARE FUND INSPECTOR, PALAKKAD. 2. TAHSILDAR, KODUNGALLUR. ADV. SRI.K.D.BABU,SC,KTWWFB(TODDY WORKERS WE FOR R1 R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. BEJOY CHANDRAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP.(C) No.29662 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 13th day of October, 2008 JUDGMENT Ext.P4 is a judgment obtained by the petitioner on an earlier occasion. This court directed the first respondent to verify the payments made by the petitioner and make adjustments and issue revised statement to the petitioner within two weeks. The prayer sought in the writ petition is to consider and pass orders on the further representation filed by the petitioner. There is no indication in the writ petition whether the respondent has complied with the above direction. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the first respondent got instructions and submits that pursuant to Ext.P4 a revised statement was served to the petitioner on 26.5.2008. In the light of this, I am not inclined to grant any relief in this writ petition. But I leave it open to the petitioner, if he is aggrieved, to seek such remedies as may be available to him in law against the revised statement. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb