FAO (MVA) 16 of 2006. 25.3.2009 Present: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, counsel for the appellant. Mr. Ajay Dhiman, counsel for respondents 1 to 6. Mr. Praneet Gupta, counsel for respondent No. 7. The appellant has challenged the award made by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Learned counsel for the appellant has urged a number of grounds in support of the contention that prima facie no liability can be fastened on the appellant herein and the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal is wrong in not considering the insurance policy etc. which has been filed by the appellant alongwith this appeal. This is an interim order which has been passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and I do not deem it fit and proper to interfere at this stage. It will be open to the appellant to urge all objections regarding maintainabililty of the petition, legality of the interim award made and all such other and further grounds to show and demonstrate that the appellant is not liable to pay any compensation, leave alone interim -2- compensation and no liability can be fastened on the appellant. This appeal is accordingly disposed of. A direction is issued to the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal to expedite the hearing/ disposal of the main petition. Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of and interim order(s) vacated. March 25, 2009 (PC). (Dev Darshan Sud), J.