IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-21621 of 2009 Date of decision:03.11.2009. Rajinder Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. G.S.Jagpal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. B.B.S.Teji, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. H.S.Dhindsa, Advocate, for Mr. R.S.Bajaj, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. The parties to the impugned prosecution i.e. petitioners and respondent No.2 have compounded the offences and have placed on record documented compromise, which may be read as Annexure P-2. Petitioners and respondent No.2 were present in the Court on 26.10.2009 and were identified by their respective counsel. They owned up the compounding on 26.10.2009. They further stated that presently there was no dispute subsisting between them. Their joint statement was also recorded separately on 26.10.2009. In the larger interest of the society and to enable the parties to maintain cordial relations, the petition shall stand allowed and FIR No.119 dated 08.07.2009, under Sections 326, 324, 452, 120-B, 148, 149 IPC, P.S. Phillaur, District Jalandhar (Annexure P-1) shall stand quashed on account of compounding. November 03, 2009 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE