CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 3010 OF 2007 -1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. DATE OF DECISION: May 01, 2008 Parties Name Partap Singh ..PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Haryana and others ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K. C. PURI PRESENT: Mr. J.P.Dhull, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana; JASBIR SINGH, J. (oral) Order. By filing this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed that a writ of certiorari be issued to quash letter dated December 7, 2006, vide which his representation against adverse confidential remarks, for the years 1991- 92 and 1992-93, was rejected. It is his further prayer that he be granted assured career progression scales on completion of 10 and 20 years of service. It is apparent from the records that for the year 1991-92 , integrity of the petitioner was recorded, by the reporting officer, as doubtful and overall grading given to him was average. It was also mentioned in the above said report that he is a habitual embezzler. In response to notice issued by this Court, reply has been filed, CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 3010 OF 2007 -2 wherein it has been stated that during his service career, the petitioner has earned to his credit 34 punishments. A look at the orders passed against the petitioner clearly proves that in the confidential report, it has rightly been mentioned that the petitioner is a habitual embezzler. His honesty was also found doubtful. Reporting Officer, in view of facts, mentioned above, was justified in saying so. It has also come on record that on the basis of above said entry in his record, extension in service was not granted to the petitioner and he was ordered to be retired from service w.e.f. April 3, 2004. So far as claim of the petitioner to get assured career progression scale is concerned, we are of the opinion that in view of his unsatisfactory service record, the same has rightly been declined to him. In reply, it has been mentioned as under: “It is further submitted that so far as the question of granting ACP pay scale to the petitioner on completion of 10/20 years of regular satisfactory service is concerned, it is submitted that the pay of the petitioner has been fixed at the stage of Rs. 4750/- as on 16.5.2003 vide order No. 2120/ECC Dated 10.4.2006 in the pay scale of Rs. 3050-4590 by granting notional increments in compliance with the orders dated 13.12.2005 passed in CWP No. 4814 of 2005. The petitioner has already been granted the benefit of continuity of service i.e. His length of service has been counted w.e.f. 10-11-1971. Besides, the petitioner is also not entitled for Second Higher Standard Pay scale w.e.f. 1.1.94 and Second ACP Scale of the post of Conductor in the pay scale applicable w.e.f. 1.1.96 for the reason that the petitioner has not earned 70% good or above reports during the last 10 CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 3010 OF 2007 -3 years as in the ACRs of the petitioner for the years 1991-92 and 1992-93 the integrity of the petitioner has been shown doubtful.” To get ACP scale, employee is supposed to have satisfactory record. No case is made out for interference. Dismissed. ( Jasbir Singh ) Judge ( K. C. Puri ) May 01, 2008. Judge DKC