1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CA NO.8928/2009 IN FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.17573/2009. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.AB Gatne, Adv. for appellant; Mr.DR Jaybhar, Adv. for Respondent No.1 ___ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 5 th February, 2010. ... 1) Heard. 2) There is delay of 67 days in appellant/insurance company prosecuting the matter. The official hassles added fuel in the appellant taking up the matter. The appellant feels that the calculation by the learned Judge needs interference. The delay being sufficiently explained, condoned. Application allowed. 3) Mr.Jaybhar waives service on behalf of the claimant in the appeal. 4) The owner is indeed is served by affixing the notice at the conspicuous place of residence, but did not turn. 5) Keep the appeal for hearing at the time of admission to 10th March, 2010. 6) In the meantime, the appellant/insurance 2 company will ensure service on owner of the vehicle by RPAD and even by private notice. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/ca8978.09