IN THR HTGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR WRrTPETITIC^(S1N(3^^0F2^ PETniONER: MLA'^^. ..*** ^s^'^ *6XS°" 3 ./y v Shiva Nand Prasad Diwedi, Aged Aboiit- 52 Years, S/o- Ghandra Bhan Prasad Diwedi, Occupation- Service- Forester , Posted at Eorest Range (PartcUhetra)- Baharashi, Forest Divisidn- Maneridragarh, Distt- Korea(C.G.) VE^SUS RESPONDENT(S)<^'r State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) -2.Gonservator of Foresti^,; Surguja, Distt. Surgujai ^(C:.G.), .\,'^ . : ,'. :;^.-' C 3.@ivisional Forest Officer,; EQresfc Divisioh-1 ^Manendragairh, Distt-; Korea(C.G:) 4. Ofiice of the Chief ElectOral Gf&cer, Indravad Khand Mantralaya Parisar G.Ei RoadRaipur(e.G.) -5. KamleshwaT Prasa4 .Mislfa, IS^o- SMri G.M Misfaa-a, Aged About- 5^ years, Forester^ FoEesjt; DiVision- iKIanendragaSt'^, DistB-KoreafC.G.) '^^Ii;'g!??3i;; t^\ 'i.^ :• ••t'{."; i .X w WRH'PETn'lQNUNDERARnCLE2260FTHE CQNgTFFUTlON 0K INDIA FtT.'TATT c' rtT? f'tli T? HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH : BiLASPUR WRIT PETITION(S1N0.70S5/2009 PETmONER RESPONDENTS ShivaNarid Prasad Diwedi Versus State of Chhattisgarhand others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Sinale Bench: Hon'bleShri Satish K. Aanihotri. J. Present:- Shri Vinay Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. Shri N. Naha Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORALORDER (Passed on this 02nd dayof December, 2009) With the consent of learned counsel forthe parties, the petition is heard finally. | (2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitionersubmits that by considering the representation of respondent No.5-Shri Kamleshwar Prasad Mishra, the petitioner has been affected substantially without affording him an opportunity of hearing to putforward his case. (3) Be that as it may, in acase where by quashing one order, another person, who was eariier transferred, is affected, ina normal case, he should have been given opportunity of hearing to put forward his case. (4) Accordingiy, the petitionstands disposed of with an obsen/ation that if the petitioner makes a representation before the respondent authorities, the same may be considered in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of three weeks. ^__——— Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Tumanej: