IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COITRT CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) M.C.C. NO. °L3-5 /2oii (S.B.) SBBtoBencft ARISING OUT OF W.P. (C) 374 / 2009 BETITIONER ^^^ ^" %f^( /^RESPONDENTS Raghuwansh Mani Tiwari, aged about 66 years, S/o Late shri Satyanarayan Tiwari, R/o Sadar -Bazar, Bilaspur, Tahsil and Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.). VERSUS 1. ^' ^-> 5. 7. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Board of Revenue of Chhattisgarh, through : The President, Board of Revenue, Principle Seat at Bilaspur (C.G.) The Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Additional Collector, Bilaspur, Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.) Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Bilaspur (C.G.) Shri Lakshaman Bag S'ansthan, Rewa, through : The Administrator <Lakshaman Bag Sanshthan, Rewa (M.P.) Shri Prapanna Mishra, aged about 48 years, S/o Late Shri Shridhar Mishra, R/o Juni Line, Bilaspur (C.G.) APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF THE W.P. (C) N0. ^-^-——— -.—— — —— ——— —.- 374'72009 ORDER PASSED BY SHRI JUSTICE PRASHANT ^^~ KUMAR MISHRA. ON 14.02.2011, IN WHICH QN ACCOUNT OF THE N0 REPRESENTATION ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER AND N0 APPEARANCE OF THE PETITIONER. THE HON'BLE JUDGE ^ISMISSED^ THE CASE. CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 14.02.2001 IS FILE HEREWITH AS ANNEXURE A/l. 1 SII^T ^T f<-l ?TaTT 3TT^T Sh^t-^ Barve 'S^Sf ^]<)|y4|^ Qtlly'IS, fq<ni'M^< _.........IY].C6:.V^.W 3tI^T •<T5 (ipfg^tT) TOIRR^fef 311^1 13-5-2011:- Ms. Mamta Shrivastava, Shri G.D. Waswani, Govt. Ad' Learned counsel for the ail a statement has been made-m th| that the fact of dismissal of the vl the applicant in the month of Jun^ affidavit filed in support of the the said fact came to the knowle|dg of April, 2011. Learned counsel the said part of the application instead ofJune, 2011. Prayeraccepted. Learned counsel is permitt^ Heard on I.A. No.1, applics the MCC. On due consideration, the| filing the MCC is hereby condonep. For the reasons stated in No.374/2009 is directed to be rest ccjunsel for the applicant. Advocate for the State. fiplicant submits that by inadvertence i| application for condonation of delay |'rit petition came to the knowledge of ;, 2011. She would submit that in the aplplication, it has been mentioned that )e of the applicant in the first week jsubmits that in the interest ofjustice, may kindly be read as April, 2011 •gillfcliil-i tlllTi-il'•if'fS'cst <f°««;l< ^?3ifiTIT3n^?I ^d to correct the application. |tion for condonation of delay in filing application is allowed and delay in |the MCC, it is allowed and W.P.(C) fored to its original number. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge r