^' TN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATU&E AT BILASPUR (C.G.) CIVILHEVISIOMNO.I^ OF 2006sinfll& Be"ch' AMLlicants: ^ ff^- ^•^^^ ^^ ^••••- 1» Haji Harun Usman, S/o Late Haji Sattar Usman, Aged 57 years^ . present President-Anjuraan Islamia Committee^ Jama Masjid, Salhewar Para, Dhamtari, District-Dharatari, (Chhattisgarh) 2, Principal, Anj uman/Prathmik/Purva/Uchha Madhyaniik Shala, Salhewar Para, Dhamtari, District-Qhanitari (C.G,) 3. Anjuman School Shikshan ^"^ Committee, Dhamtari, present Presicient- Haji Hari Usman, Dhamtari, District-Dhamtari, (Chhattisgarh). 4. Inayat Ali, Son of Late Haji Sayyed Shahadat Ali, Member-School Shikshan Committee, Resident of Sihava Chowk, Dhamtari, District-Dhamtari (C.G.) ^5, Haji Ayyub, Son of Late Rassul, , Member-School Shikshan Coraiai- itee, R/o Sadar Bazar, Dhamtari, District-Dhamtari. (Chhattisgarh). ,6. Sultan Khan, Son of Gaffar Khan, | Meraber-School Shikshan Commit- tee, Rfo-G^'yay^-^Y-»^b^oiA<vvb^ i -2- ^ 7. Iqbal Usman, ^ Son of La-fce Habib Usraan, *Member'-School Shikshan Coramittee, Resideiat of Usmania Bada, Near Gol Bazar, Dhamtari, District-Dhamtari, (Chhattisgarh). 8. Saleera Nabi, / Son of Late Mala Seth, 'MQBiber*- School Shikshan Coinaittee, Risaipara, Dhamtari, District-Dhamtari, (Chhattisgarh). 9» Haneef Qureshi, Son of Farooq Qureshi, *Secretary*-Anjt2iBan School Shikshan Comiaittee, Resident of AcU-iari, Navagaon Ward, Dhamtari, District-Dhamtari, (Chhattisgarh). >°• Secretary, Anjuraan Islaraia Committee, Jama Masjid, Salhewara Para, ©hamtari, District-Dhamtari, (Chhattisgarh). VERSUS aesoondents: Plaintiffs 1. 2. .^' 3. ^' Srat. Seema Sinha, Wife of Praveen Sinha, R/o Rambagh Ward, Dhamtari, District-Dhamtari (C.G.), State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Collector, Dhamtari, Di s tri c t-Dhamtari, (Chhattisgarh). District Education Offieer Dhamtari, Distriet-Dhamtari, (Chhattisgarh). -3- CIVIL REVISION UNDER SECTION 115 OF THE CODE _QF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 1908< XI-HC-22 ,3TT^T^)T f^W3TI^T sRt^nl^T -1 Sv^u^ ^ 3:^^NI<1^, ^Tft^^l^, f^dl^y 3ll^l ^sich iTrawa?m^ '";'"" w^ 200^ i^rc^' 3TT^T?^[T^K^cT 02.08.2006 Shri Awadh Tripathj, coyns<| Heard on admission. This revision is directed dated 22.4.2006, by which an obj the pleadings of the plaint was the trial Court directed that th^ plaintiff, verifying the pleadings The copy ofthe plaint is A perusal of the plaint namely- Smt. Seema Sinha, has of attorney and father namely- Verma has verified the pleadings. | Under the provjsions the appearance etc. can be ma4 attorney but, he has no right of p| the plaintiff like the present one, herself. The tria! Court has rig(| curable and has rightiy passed arl rectified. There appears to be no il| the trial Court. The revision dismjssed. cbi^F^i141ri ^i^ciT^'te(^'<Ri<^i< ^^rf^T3TT^T s^j for the applicants. ^gainst that part of the order jection regarding verification of o|/erruled by the trial Courtand mistake be rectified by the oftheplaint. sh4)wn to this Court. t^ould show that the plaintiff |!ed this suit through her power $hri P.C.Verma and Shri P.C. of Orfler 3, Rule 2 of C.P.C., though (e by the constituted power of leadings and the plaint fifed by hiust be verified by the plaintifF |»tly held that the mistake was order that the same should be legality in the order passed by has no merit. The same is Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge (<ft^^?r) /\