HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 300 of 2006 (SS) Bhawani Ballabh s/o Sri G.N. Nautiyal, Management Trainee Dugdh Utpadan Sahkari Sangh Ltd; Dehradun. ........ Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal 2. Managing Director/Milk Commissioner, Uttaranchal Sahkari Dairy Federation Ltd; Haldwani, Nainital ............. Respondents Dated: 21.3.2006 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard Sri B.P. Nautiyal counsel for the petitioner and Standing Counsel for the respondents. By the present writ petition the petitioner has challenged the order dated 20-2-2006 (Annexure No.19) and order dated 03-9-2005 (Annexure no.16) to the writ petition by which the medical leave and other leave have wrongly been rejected by the respondent no.2. In the earlier writ petition no.1170 of 2003 there is already an interim order dated 3.09.2003 not to terminate the service of the petitioner. In the said writ petition the petitioner sought the relief of regularization of the services as Manager 2 Grade IV or executive or he may be allow to continue till his regular appointment is materialized. Petitioner has submitted that he has filed a representation dated 23-2-2006 before the respondent no.2 and the respondent no.1 has directed the respondent No. 2 to do the needful. The said order is quoted below:- la0 58 @ih0 ,l0 @ l0l0 @ 2006 fnukad % nsgjknwu Qjojh 24] 2006 izcU/k funs’kd lgdkjh nqX/k la?k mRrjkapy] gY}kuh A fucU/kd] nqX/k lgdkjh lfefr;ka] mRrjkapyA d`i;k izkFkhZ Jh Hkokuh cYyHk] izcU/k izfk{kkFkhZ] nsgjknwu nqX/k mRiknd lgdkjh la?k fyfeVsM] nsgjknwu@ mRrjkapy dk¡ijsfVo Ms;jh QsMsjsku fyfeVsM] gY}kuh usSuhrky dk layXu i= bl vk’k; ls iszf’kr fd;k tk jgk gS fd i= ij fu;ekUrxZr dk;Zokgh djus dk d’B djsa rFkk d`r dk;Zokgh ls v/kksgLrk{kjh dks Hkh voxr djkus dk d’V djsaA layXud % mijksDrkuqlkj g0v0 ¼uohu pUnz 'kekZ½ lfpoA** In view of the aforesaid the respondent no. 2 is directed to pass the appropriate orders on the representation of the petitioner. It is made clear that the order passed on 24-8-2004 & 3- 9-2005 (page 45 & 46) shall be subject to the final order passed 3 on the representation of the petitioner in the light of the letter dated 24-2-2006. However in the circumstances of the case the effect of the order dated 24.08-2005 and 03.09.2005 shall remain in abeyance for a period of four months. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of . No order as to cost. Dated: 21.3.2006 Rajesh Tandon J. *Dhyani