IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.1093 OF 2004 Deepa Ketan Shah ....Plaintiff V/s. Metpro Engg. Systems Ltd. & Ors. ....Defendants Mr.C.A. Shukla i/b Mr.B.S. Chandnani for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 10TH NOVEMBER, 2009. P.C. :- 1. The suit is based on a bill of exchange drawn by Defendant No. 1 and accepted by Defendant Nos.2 and 3. The Defendants’ dishonoured the said bill of exchange when presented by non-payment. There is no reply to the Plaintiff’s advocates notice demanding payment. 2. The Defendants have not filed the appearance. The Defendants are absent today. 3. The compilation of the documents filed earlier in the office is tendered. The same is taken on record and marked “A” collectively. 4. There is no defence to the suit. There is nothing on record that militates against the Plaintiff’s claim in suit. 5. In the circumstances, the suit is decreed as prayed. Refund as per rules.