WP(C) 6223/2007 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI Heard Mr. A. K. Goswami, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. G. Soren, learned Govt. Advocate, Assam. The materials laid before the Court would go to show that the disciplinary proce eding against the petitioner has been concluded and punishment of deduction of a part of the pension permanently amounting to Rs.200/- per month has been propos ed. However, the disciplinary authority has taken the view that the said punishm ent will have to be approved by the Assam Public Service Commission which body h as already been moved. Without expressing any opinion on the correctness of the view taken by the disciplinary authority with regard to the necessity of consult ation with the Public Service Commission, the Court has correlated the reliefs s ought in the writ petition and the consequences emanating from the disciplinary proceeding, as noticed above. On such correlation the Court finds no live issue for adjudication in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly closed with liberty to the petitioner to seek h is remedies in law, if required against such punishment that may be finally impo sed with the approval of the Public Service Commission. All consequential benefits to which the petitioner as may be entitled in law fol lowing such punishment may be finally awarded shall be conferred to him forthwit h and without any delay.