AB 326/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. BARUAH. Heard Mr. A. K. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K. Munir, le arned Addl. P.P for the State of Assam. The petitioner, Idrish Ahmed has preferred this application for providing him an ticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr. P.C in connection with Garchuk P.S Case N o. 261 of 2010 registered under Section 407 IPC. Mr. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner has led me through the Police Re port (Annexure-2 to this bail application), wherefrom it appears that one Md. Ba bul Ali and another Md. Saddam are involved in this case. The allegation brough t against them is that some Nestle Products was transported through vehicle but on the way misappropriated the said products and sold in Barpeta. The police rep ort, Annexure-2 also indicates that the Investigating Officer during investigati on of the case visited residence of the Idrish Ahmed, the present petitioner in search of the misappropriated products/articles, but nothing had been recovered from his possession and that also reveals from the Case Diary. Taking note of the facts and the report of the Investigating Officer, this court finds no impediment to provide the anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The petition accordingly stands allowed with a direction that in the event of ar rest of the petitioner abovenamed in connection with aforesaid case, he shall be released on bail for Rs. 10,000/- with one surety of the like amount, subject t o the satisfaction of the arresting authority. Application stands disposed of.