1` IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application No. 4868/2007 Keith De' Fugueiredo s/o Late Mr. Ep'lham vs. Mrs. Marie Colette w/o Keith De'Fugueiredo --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : A.P. Lavande & R.V.More,JJ DATE : 5.9.2007 Although the appellant has prayed for several reliefs in the application Ms. Rane, learned counsel for the appellant states that the appellant is pressing for reliefs in terms of prayer clauses (i) and (iii) of the application. Mr. K.V.Thomas, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent on taking instruction from the respondent states that presently the children of the appellant and respondent are schooling at Nasik and they will not be shifted from Nasik without seeking prior permission of this Court. The statement is accepted. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent nothing survives in this application. Hence, the application stands disposed of. C.A.No. 5861/2007: Heard Ms Rane, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Thomas, learned counsel for respondent. By this application, the appellant seeks stay of 2` the Judgment and decree dated 16.2.2007 passed by the Family Court, Nagpur in Petition No. A-616/05 by which the marriage between the appellant and respondent has been dissolved by the decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty maintenance has been granted in favour of the respondent. The prayer has been opposed by Mr. Thomas, the learned counsel for the respondent. In our opinion, if the decree of divorce is not stayed, irreparable loss and injuries would be caused to the applicant and as such we grant stay of the impugned decree only in so far as grant of divorce is concerned. The decree in so far it grants maintenance is not stayed. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. C.A.No. 5991/2007: The learned counsel for the parties to submit modalities of the access to the children in writing for consideration of this court, within a period of one week. S.O. 13.9.2007. C.A.No. 6270/2007: Ms Rane, the learned counsel for the appellant seeks two weeks time to file reply. Time granted. S.O. three weeks. Judge Judge patle