1 CP 155 of 2006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SUO MOTU CONTEMPT PETITION NO.155 OF 2006 High Court on its own motion .....Petitioner V/s. Prakash Ranchoddas Rangwala ..... Respondent Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, APP, for the Petitioner. Mr.Prakash R. Rangwala, respondent present in person. CORAM :P.B.MAJMUDAR & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 6TH SEPTEMBER, 2010 P.C. 1. Today, respondent party-in-person is present before the Court. He pointed out that in an earlier proceedings for this very alleged allegations, he has already tendered unconditional apology which is accepted by the Division Bench of this Court and therefore, the present contempt petition is not maintainable. He further submitted that even otherwise, he has also tendered unconditional apology, there was no intention on his part to commit any contempt as stated by the learned Judge of the City Civil Court. He again tenders unconditional apology. We have gone through the proceedings. In our view, the respondent party-in- person is absolutely right that the present contempt petition is not maintainable and no further proceedings are required to be initiated against the respondent. We accordingly accept the apology tendered by 2 CP 155 of 2006 the respondent and terminate the contempt proceedings. Notice discharged. ( ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )