^•-.<^^ ^- ^(? \^>1. .^EHATIISOASH $~l1^ ,") -^' -w/ f~! z/l^^-"./ ^ ^.^^ ...••" ^.-d^i^- ^•^^>v /-^'^Suadar Lal Sahu S/Q Shri Ji'sidhan Saliu. Retired Head Master, aged about 66 years S/o ViBage Kalyanpur^ Post -, Black Akaltara District Jaa|gr-ChaiQpa (C.6.) ^••^" ...-• ^ERSUa BESPONDENTS _^v ^'~ StateofChhattisearh Throu^i: The Secretary, School Educatonal Department D.K.S. Bhawaa, 8aipur (C.G.) 2^-- The Joint Director Treasury Account & Pension Bilaspur (00.) 3. „ The District Educatioa Officer, Janjgir Chamya (C.G.) 4. The Bloek Educatioa Officer, Block Akaltara, District Jaiygir- .G.» WSIT PETITION UB[DJES._AKnCLK J226 QE THE CQNSTITU3IQNJ3RMDIA_PS>RISSjMN<^^ELWa^ HAXURE QP MANDAMUS CERTIQRARY QR ANY OTHERWRITQFyjKENATUREETC, ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petidon (S) No. 5431 of2009 Petitioner Sundar Lal Sahu Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & others (Writ Petition under Ardcle 226 of the Constitution of India) (SB: HonTile Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri D.R. Patel, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State. O R D ER (oral) ( Passed on this 22nd day of September, 2009 ) Heard. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petidoner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition, with liberty to make a representation to the concemed authority for consideration of his case in the Ught of the judgment and order passed by the Hontile Supreme Court in State of Tripura and others Vs. K. K. Roy1. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection. In view of the foregoing the writ petition is disniissed as withdrawn, with the above-stated liberty. No order asto costs. Tumane Sd/- SatishK.Agnihom Judge 'AIR 2004 SC 1249