C. Review No.21/2009 21.8.2009:Present: Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Baldev Singh, Advocate for respondent No.1. The petitioner is seeking review of the judgment passed in CWP (T) No.2394/2008 dated 9.1.2009. The petitioner has primarily assailed the appointment of respondent No.4 at the time of arguments. His contentions to this effect were recorded in the judgment. The appointment of respondent No.4 was quashed on 9.1.2009. The petitioner himself has not chosen to assail the appointment of respondents No. 5 to 9 at the time of arguments. In these circumstances, there is no error on the face of record. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge. August 21, 2009. *awasthi*