IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.927 of 2007 BHUPENDRA NATH SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 19.9.2008. This application has been filed against the order dated 19.4.2007 passed by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Manjhaush, Begusarai in Case No. 24(M)/2007 thereby the rule issued under Section 144 Cr.P.C. has been made absolute against the petitioner and the same has been vacated against the opposite party. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In course of submission, it is admitted by both the parties that the life of the proceeding has already expired long long ago. However, court below against the scope of the proceeding has entered into the actual title and possession of the parties and made certain observation in favour of the opposite party no. 2. The other submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that against the scope of the proceeding learned SDM got the standing crops harvested and handed over - 2 - to opposite party no. 2. Considered the submission of learned counsel for both the parties and perused the impugned order. Admittedly, the life of the proceeding has already expired long long ago. In this view of the matter, the observation made any in the impugned order shall not be binding upon either of the parties. So far the other submission is concerned; the petitioner can take action for recovery of the price of the crops from the opposite party no. 2 in appropriate civil suit, if so advised. With the above observation, this application stands disposed of. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)