IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-30179 of 2009 Date of Decision:14.1.2010 Naresh Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Hemant Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that recovery so effected from the petitioner is 400 grams smack. Further the co-accused from whom recovery was shown as 200 grams smack, has been granted bail by the Judge/Special Court vide order dated 5.12.2009 on the ground that 200 grams of smack was non commercial quantity. Actually, taking into account the recovery from both the accused persons, who were together, it comes to 600 grams. Thus, it would amount to 300 grams each. Reliance has been placed on the judgment of the Apex Court in the Case of E. Micheal Raj v. Intelligence Officer, Narcotic Control Bureau 2008(2) R.C.R. (Criminal) 597 to contend that admittedly as per the FSL report, the quantity of Diacetlymorphine was 14.76% which would amount to non commercial quantity. Without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawanshar 14.1.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE