IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3515 of 2010 Between: Y.Dhanalakshmi ..... PETITIONER AND Smt.Mallavaram Gowri and 8 others .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3515 of 2010 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 16.07.2010 in I.A.829/2009 in impleading the 1st respondent herein as respondent in I.A.487/2008 in O.S.57/2005 on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Tirupati. The suit filed by the petitioner along with respondents Nos.2 to 7 against Respondents Nos.8 and 9 for partition of the properties in equal shares and to allot one such share to each of the plaintiffs was decreed preliminarily for division of the plaint schedule properties into 9 equal shares and for allotment of one such share to each of the plaintiffs and defendants by metes and bounds and the actual partition by metes and bounds shall take place in the final decree proceedings and the mesne profits, if any, shall also be determined in a separate application. After passing of the preliminary decree, the plaintiffs filed I.A.487/2008 for passing of the final decree and in the said application, the 1st respondent herein filed I.A.829/2009 to permit her to come on record as 3rd respondent in the said I.A. as proper and necessary party for adjudication of the proceedings alleging that she has purchased the share of the 8th respondent/1st defendant, therefore, she entered into the shoes of the 8th respondent/1st defendant and she is entitled for the rights whatever the 8th respondent/1st defendant accrued in the suit. The said application was allowed by the impugned order holding that the 1st respondent herein having purchased the property would enter into the shoes of the 1st defendant in the suit and therefore, she is entitled to come on record. When one of the parties to the suit transfers/sells her share of property, it is obvious that the purchaser would be entitled to have the right what has been accrued by the vendor. When the final decree proceedings are pending, the purchaser is entitled to participate in the final decree proceedings in the place of her vendor. Therefore, I do not see any infirmity legal or otherwise in allowing the said application by the Court below. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 13.08.2010 Dsr