IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM TUESDAY, THE 27TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 5TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 24634 of 2011(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- N.RAVEENDRAN, PUTHENVILA VEEDU MARANCODE, ALANKODE, ATTINGAL THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 102. BY ADV. SRI.B.RAGUNATHAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM RURAL, VIKAS BHAVAN PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 033. 2. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM RURAL, ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 101. 3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ATTINGAL,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 101. 4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 101. 5. SHRI N.VIDYADHARAN VIDYARADH, MARANCODE, ALANKODE, ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 101. 6. SHRI.DEEPESH S/O.SHRI, N.VIDYADHARAN VIDYARADH, MARANCODE, ALANKODE, ATTINGAL,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 101. BY ADV.SMT.C.M.CHARISMA, GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR R1-4 SRI.M.BALAGOVINDAN FOR R5-6 SRI.T.K.ANANDA PADMANABHAN FOR R5-6 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 24634 of 2011(D) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P1TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DT.19.5.2007. EXT.P2TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT DT.13.6.2011 ON THE FILE OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS KAGISTRATE COURT I, ATTINGAL. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE ami/ PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.24634 of 2011 ------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of September, 2011. J U D G M E N T PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, J. Learned counsel for respondents 5 and 6 sought for a short time to file counter affidavit. This is a writ petition where the petitioner seeks protection for his life from threats and apprehended contumacious acts of respondents 5 and 6. The allegation of the petitioner is that though Ext.P1 was submitted to the police, the police have not taken any action. On considering the writ petition for admission, we on 7.9.2011 passed the following interim order. “..... In the meanwhile, Government Pleader will seek instructions from the 4th respondent as to the correctness of the averments in the writ petition. He will be specifically enquired on to what is the status of the investigation pursuant to Ext.P2 FIR. In view of the assertion of Mr.B.Reghunath, learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is leading a solitary life in his house, the 4th respondent will conduct an enquiry into the correctness of the averments in the writ petition and if the enquiry reveals that as alleged by the petitioner there is subsisting threat to his life from respondents 5 and 6, the 4th respondent will do the needful to ensure that the petitioner's life is safe.” 2. The learned Government Pleader submitted that based on Exts.P1 complaint, Ext.P2 FIR was filed and the enquiry was 2 W.P.(C) No.24634 of 2011 completed and charge sheet was submitted to the Magistrate, arraying respondents 5 and 6 as accused. Learned Government Pleader submitted that if in future any complaint is received from the petitioner regarding any threat from respondents 5 and 6, an enquiry will be conducted promptly and such action as is warranted by the result of the enquiry will also be taken. We record the above submission of Government Pleader. We record also the submission of the learned counsel for respondents 5 and 6 that those respondents have no intention at all to cause any danger to the life of the petitioner. We dispose of the writ petition, recording the above submissions. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE ami/