IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.52333 of 2007 BEBHASON RABIDAS, son of Makhan Rabidas, resident of village- Harichak Kosri, P.S. Antichak (Kahalgaon), District-Bhagalpur ...Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, 2. Subodh Jha, son of Late Govind Pd. Dubey, 3. Pramod Jha, 4. Binod Chandra Jha, 5. Amodh Chandra Jha, sons of Late Govind Pd. Dubey (Dismissed against respondent nos. 2 to 5 vide order dated 16.3.2009) 6. Manoj Dubey, 7. Lalan Dubey, sons of Late Govind Pd. Dubey, Resident of village- Nabads, P.S. Antichak, District- Bhagalpur 8. Promod Rabidas son of Ganesh Rabidas 9. Begha Rajak son of Mohan Rajak, 10. Bari Paswan son of Kona Paswan (Dismissed against respondent nos. 9 and 10 vide order dated 16.3.2009. 11. Bajrangi Sahni son of Schabi Sahni, 12. Bersspati Paswan son of Tatan Paswan, 13. Bhagwan Paswan son of Kamdhari Paswan, All resident of village- Antichak Kasri, P.S. Antichak, District- Bhagalpur … Opposite Parties ----------- 7/ 02.04.2010 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Counsel for the respondents is present. The petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 22.4.1998, passed by the S.D.M., Kahalgaon, in Misc. Case No.224 of 1998 and the order dated 7.9.2007 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, 1st, Bhagalpur, in Cr. Revision No.327 of 1998, dismissing the revision application. The facts of the case are that a proceeding under section 144 Cr. P. C. was initiated by the SDM on a police report. Thereafter, on consideration of the rival contention of the parties the Magistrate converted the proceeding under section 145 Cr. P. C. and also passed an order for attaching the crops which was subject to natural decay under section 148 Cr. P. C. and appointed a Receiver with regard to - 2 - the same. The proceeds were to be deposited before the Sub-Divisional Nazarat. The petitioner being aggrieved by this order filed revision being Cr. Revision No. 327 of 1998 before the Additional Sessions Judge, who dismissed the same on 7.9.2007. On going through the orders, I find no illegality in the matter and, therefore, this application under section 482 Cr. P. C. after dismissal of the revision application is not maintainable. Also today, no one is present in the court to apprise it about the stage of the case and as to whether any final orders have been in the matter. In view of such, this application is dismissed. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)