HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA$PUR Writ Pet§tion (S) NG. 21 35 of 2Q08 Petmsner Angeshwar Prasad Chaturvedi, S/o. Late Ehagwandi Chaturvedi, aged about 56 years‘ R!o. Purani Basti Peadra, P.O. Pendra, Disit. Biiaspur, (9.6.) Versus Respondents 1. State af Chhamsgarh, Thmugh its Secretary, Panchayat & Rum! DeVempment Depax’tment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Biock Develcpment Ofticer, office of the Blo¢k Devetopment Officer, Triba! Development (Biock). Pendra, Distt. Buaspur (C.G.) Chief Engineer, Rural Engineering $ervice (R.E.S.), omee of Deveiopment Commissiener, Raipur (CG) 4. Execiitive Engineer, Rurai Engineering Sewice, Cifiice 20f Rura! Engineeiing Service (R.E.S.) Division Marwahi Head quarter Pendra. Distt. Biiaepuf. Oi) WRQT PETiTiON UNDER ARHCLE 226 OF THE CON§TiTUTiCM OF INDIA. Singie Bench : Hon‘ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihetri, J. shii Vince Deshmukh, AdVecate foi the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Deputy Govt. Advecaie for the respondents. GRAL ORDER (Passed on this 11‘" day oi Aprii, 2008) 1. With the cement oi (earned ceunsei appeafing fOi the parties. the i petition is heard iinatly. 2. Learned counsei appeaiing fet the petitiener, on instructions, submits that the petitioner confinee his ptayer to consideration of his 34L representation (Annexure Pi5). which it appears. has been received on 7.3.2008 in the oftice of the Executive Engineer, Rurai Engineering e Service. Division Marrrahi. Pendra. g). gn Thakur There is n0 reascn f¢r any oppasition by the reSpcnden:s, therefore. 8hr? Dwiviedi, learned counse! appearmg f0: the respondents does not oppose the prayer fer consideranen of the representaticn. {t is erdered accordingiy. Wtthout expressing any amnion on merits 0f the caee, the respondent No.4 is directed t6 consider the repreeentation of the petitioner. on ite own merits, in aeoordanoe with iaw; expeditiously. tn View of the foregoing. this petition stands disposed of. No costs. o Sd/— V ii Satish K.’ Agnihotri Judge