3mm Beach AppsuA'iG% . . . . ’ ”r( A¢GU$ED:~ Lullnm 7 slo Jhadunm as“! 36yoars Rh Vin-gu- Kama, ES. Shim-3 Distt Bum 6.6. VERSUS RESPONDENT:- Th. Stat. of ma Through P.S.Bhilai -3 Disttmufg L ”f}®?§g Uls 2%6 Canvlctlan hr period of /W J/A § $3“ one month ad rino 01' R3500!- wk $ V K Wé U/ w Q) ulssoos Ipc conviction tor poriod u WV six months and fine of Rs.sooi- Arum. ms 37 2 cr.P.c. AGAms'r Junanmsm‘ . / ‘ , J H DATEn ammo m spEcIAL cnmmm. ans: noso’' mtiri; i...‘ HEGH COURT OF CHHAWE$§A§H AT EILA$§U§Q $mgia 3em‘h : Haa‘bke fWn é’uswca Prwiwkar Dwmkar CriminaE Angeai Na4§8 m‘ zGGé AWELLAN? Laiwmm, $/<3 Jhadumm Varsas 5mm of Chha’rJrisgcsr‘h R§SPONDEN? Mr. Am} S‘ F’andey, counsei far The appeilam. Mr. Akm Mishmi Dy. EA. far “rim resmndanf/ESmm. CRIIVHNAL AWEAE UND£R SEQTION 374 {2} QF THE (KEN? {3F CRIMIKW 9Rai£:bURE 3;” U i) 6 M E N T {€15.352G1 1) Tbs appeai is direc‘red againsf fhe impugned judgmem‘ and order dated 8‘62006 passed by Specicd Judge, burg in Speciai CaSe NaéO/EQOf) cmvicfing “(he accused/apgeibnf far we offence punishabk under Sec?i0n 294 and 506 par? II of The, Endian Penal Code and senfencing him Tc undergo rigorous imprisanmen’r for cue menih and pay fine of Qs500 u/S 294, rigorous imprisonmenf far six mcnfhg and pay fine 0‘? Rs.500/— u/S 506 par-r 1i IPC, pgus defaulf sfipula‘fions. 2. Brief facTs of fhe ca$e are fnm on 9.11.2004 FER. (EXP-4}. was iodged by The campiainan‘? Lekhmm (PW-4) cdleging in if “Hm“? 0n f‘nn‘r day {rher‘a was some dispufe befrwezn ‘rhz childr‘xan Gf 'rhe bro'fhzr of fhe accused/uppeHan? and famuy membars of irhe compiainam', E’s is aiEQQed ‘?ha‘§' he was abused by ‘a‘he accused/appeum‘r in a nubiit piace and, Thereaftgr, fhe necwed/appeimnf dse ‘ihreamnaci him. Basad en this report cffencas under Szcfions 29.4 and 566 parf Ii 0f Jrhe Indian Penai Code and Sacrion 3(1) (x) 0f fhe Scheduied Cagife & SCheduied Tribe {Prevem‘ian Csf Afrocifies) Ac? were regigfered agnins? The accused/appe!ian€a After campieirien 0f invesfigauan, \ chat/$7 waé'fued by The pciéca gm 31.12.2004 far We. sa d Offences, 3. En order 'Zra agwbiish ih? guih" 0f fhe accugaii/ammellawh T’I ‘E'ke prasgcufion has exam§ned a3 many as fiva wifnggses. Stafe:’ae?1‘r 0'? fhg accused/apigeiim? was aiga regarded undar Sam‘mn 3?.3 ‘11? ‘?§1e Ccde 0f Crimim! Pmcedura r\ whim he damad 1w chargas §evei§€d againsa‘ him and ps‘aadaa his immame and “33kg impiicm‘iw m WE:“- case; Apar? fmm +h§si wifngss' mmziy 3§3G4Jh£aram (EA —1} hag aissa been ammmgd by 1mg defence m supmr? of ifs case. 4, After hearing the parties The Triai Ccum‘ has acqui‘Hegi fhe accused/appeiian? cf the cf‘fanca punishabie under secficn 3(1)(><) of :hhe Ac“! bu? cam/icfad arid sanitencad him far The offences a3 manféoaed abova; Hence ?his agapeai; 5p Heard camse! for the parfies cmd yemsed 'fhe maferid axiaiMbEe an record includmg ir’he juegmem imnugeed, 6H Cmmse! far ‘ihe appeiiam submiw Thai? he §s my? pvessmg ‘khis cupped 30 far ae if reiafes ’ro we cmvicfion we? of The impugned judgmem and woutd have a iimifed wayer wiirh respecw‘ TO me Semence par? fhereof Gmy. He submi'fs fhafr we appeilanf has already remamed n 0a: f0!" emu? 8 days, imcidem? eccurred cm aacounf 0f ‘irivigi issue whey! The ehHdrea of fhe bm‘rher 6f 'g‘he accused/aggeMn‘? and ma? on? “:iamiiy members cf fhe ccmpigima? were pkg/Eng! has famiiy respens§b§lity and we? ‘Pne reia‘rions befween campla§mm and the accused/appeiian‘? have agam became cordiai and, trerefore, m usefui purpase wauid be served m sending rémxm jaia- I am it? {Mamd be in a‘be inferesi‘ 0f §U$+§ce if +he sememe émeosed an him is reduced “r0 period dread}! undergone by him. To Wig, caurse§ fer fhe grate hag m serieus abjeciion, u 7‘ Or; “me a‘rher rand, cgunrsei fer f‘ne 5mm suppor‘ring V‘he impugned Judgmen? submii‘s ‘mat m ien§ency be Shawn f0 him while O). imposmg punishmzm‘? umdar $€cfian$ 294 md 566 par’r LT. m‘ “me Endicm ?emi Cade‘ 8. Accarding§y, ‘i’i’ae canvi.'rien pa‘r’r Q“? ‘irha ‘éudgmen? impugnad i$ mammmad. Hawever, keeping in View of We facf fha‘f the appeigcmf ms aSraady mmaingd in jau for about 8 ejays am Tha?‘ fhe maiden? eccurr‘ed a?) acccun‘r of friviai §ssue and, ‘g‘-her‘efor‘e h§$ $en‘ten42e is reduced ‘m The period already under‘gma by him. Haweve'f‘uwe apgeiian? §$ direckd w pay Rs. 2,G00x’- as c0mpansa‘?io,n “m The camgiainanf Lekhmm (?W—4} undar Secficn 357. 0f i‘ha Cocée of CMminai Pmwdure wifhin six ma‘n’rhs fmm madam of reCeip? (3f capy’ of fh§s arder‘. Failure, if any, in deposkking The amGunT befar‘e ‘fhe ‘mcd Cam-i? wifhéa fha pariad s?i;2uia3‘ed, wauEd maka Fae appgibm l§ab¥e f0 be inside the Jaii far a periad cf mm mam‘ks si.gie impr§swmewt 9‘ Appeal fhUS par-fly saucceeds‘ ” Sd,_ i 4 Pritinker Diwaker Judge