1 MGN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1284 OF 1999 PETITION NO.1284 OF 1999 PETITION NO.1284 OF 1999 M/s.Super Shopee ..Petitioner Versus Pune Municipal Corporation & Ors..Respondents Mr. A.V. Anturkar, for the Petitioner Mr. R.G. Ketkar, for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 Mr. V.A. Sonpal, AGP for the State. CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & R.M.SAVANT, R.M.SAVANT, R.M.SAVANT, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE: 24TH MARCH, 2008 P.C. . Having heard learned Counsel for the parties what remains to be considered is the direction for removal of the otta. We find that the Counsel have raised a contention as to whether the notice contemplated by Section 253 of the Act can be issued considering the contention advanced that the Bye-laws are no longer in force. . In the light of the above in our opinion the appropriate course would be that the petitioner puts up a representation in the matter of the otta to the Commissioner. The petitioner to make such representation within four weeks from the date of 2 receipt of this order. The Commissioner thereafter to hear the petitioner and pass appropriate orders according to law within eight weeks on a copy of this order being served on the Commissioner. 2. In the meantime the order dated 11th March, 1999 not to be given effect to. We make it clear that the only issue left for consideration in this petition and which is the subject matter of the remand is the issue of removal of otta. 3. Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) (R.M.SAVANT, R.M.SAVANT, R.M.SAVANT, J). J). J).