1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 791 OF 2010 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 790 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant VERSUS Balu Parasram Hegadkar and anr. ...Respondents ..... Shri S.D.Kaldate, APP for applicant Shri B.P.Deshmukh, advocate holding for Shri M.B.Kolpe, advocate for the respondents. ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : 14th June, 2010 PER COURT : 1 Heard Shri S.D.Kaldate, APP for applicant and Shri B.P.Deshmukh, advocate holding for Shri M.B.Kolpe, advocate for the respondent nos. 1 and 2. 2 This is an application preferred by the applicant/State for condonation of delay of 15 days caused in filing the accompanying Criminal Application seeking leave to file appeal against the judgment and order dated 31.10.2009 rendered by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad in Sessions Case No. 11 of 2009, acquitting the 2 respondents/accused for the offence punishable under Section 306 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3 For the reasons stated in the application, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily and it further appears that the delay caused in filing the accompanying application is not willful, deliberate and intentional and same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 4 In the resent, present Criminal Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B' thereof and delay of 15 days causing in filing the accompanying application seeking leave to file appeal stands condoned and present Criminal Application stands disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE), JUDGE. dbm/crap791.10