CLR No. 02 of 2001 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. This is a revision filed by the revisionists against the order dated 23.12.2000 passed by District Judge, Haridwar rejecting the application 184 (c) in regular Suit No. 6 of 1991. The application 184 (c) was moved by the revisionists for recall of the order passed by the District Judge by which leave to file suit has granted under section 92 of the C.P.C. The leave was granted in the year 1991 and thereafter the case proceeded for final hearing. The application was moved on 13.12.2000 for rejecting the leave on the ground it was filed on the fictitious ground with a view to harass the applicants by concealing the material facts. I have perused the order passed by the learned District Judge. The learned District Judge was rejected the application by cogent reasons that the evidence is closed and the case is fixed for arguments. The District Judge has also come to the conclusion that the application was moved with a view to delay the proceedings. Hence I do not find any infirmity in the order of the District Judge to exercise revisional power. The revision is dismissed. No order as to costs. Dt. 07.04.2001 (P.C. Verma, J.)