IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4741 of 2010 VIKASHJI @ PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH, SON OF DIPNARAYAN SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHANDWAN, P.S. KHUDWAN, IN THE DISTRICT OF AURANGABAD………………………………PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………………..OPPOSITE PARTY. -------- For the Petitioner : M/s. Anil Kumar Singh and Saket Tiwary, Advocates. For the State : Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, A.P.P. --------- 2. 24.2.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 384/386 of the Indian Penal Code besides Section 25(1-b)/26/35 of the Arms Act and 17 of CLA Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It has also been submitted that the co-accused, Sanjeet Mishra, from whose house there was recovery of some incriminating articles, had already been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 11.1.2010 passed in Criminal Misc. No.43404 of 2009. Learned counsel for - 2 - the petitioner produces the certified copy of the said order. Let the same be kept on record. Petitioner is stated to be in custody since 7.8.2009. Considering the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Vikashji @ Pramod Kumar Singh, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Pauthu P.S. Case No.32 of 2009, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be his father. Further, after his release in this case, if the petitioner is again found to be involved in criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)