IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14585 of 2010 AMAR DAS, Son of Late Satish Das, resident of Village- Mahaldar Toli, Police Station- Barsoi, District- Katihar.....................................Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR..............................................Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 25.05.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail in a case registered under Sections 376/511 of the I.P.C. It is alleged in the written report that on the date of occurrence the petitioner entered the house of the informant and tried to commit rape with the informant but on alarm raised by the informant, the petitioner fled away. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is next door neighbour of the informant and initially the informant filed a complaint case bearing complaint case no. 14 of 2010 as contained in Annexure-2 with allegations for the offence under Sections 452, 323 and 380 of the I.P.C. during enquiry when witnesses did not support the allegation then the present case has been lodged with frivolous allegation. 2 It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that from the F. I. R. itself it appears that no medical examination of the informant was done. Considering the enmity between two neighbours, suppression of fact about the earlier case in the written report and since the informant has not been medically examined, let the petitioner, Amar Das, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Though) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Katihar, in connection with Barsoi P.S. Case No. 25 of 2010. The learned trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if the petitioner fails to appear on three consecutive dates during trial. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)