IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 12384 of 2008 Decided on: 14.6.2011 Chandu Lal …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner : Mr. Narender Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anil Jaswal, Deputy Advocate . General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant . Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Petitioner was appointed as Godown Chowkidar in the respondent department on 3.9.1994. Mr. Narender Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has now completed more than 10 years of service and he is required to be regularized as per the scheme framed by the respondent department. 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent department to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization with all consequential benefits, immediately after completion of 8 years of service. The needful be done within a period of 10 weeks after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge June 14, 2011 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No (K. Attri)