Crl. Misc. No. M-10676 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-10676 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: September 6, 2010 Kewal Krishan @ K.B. and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present: Mr. Surinder Garg, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Raghbir Chaudhary, Sr. DAG, Punjab, for respondent No.1. Mr. Kashmir Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2. GURDEV SINGH, J. Heard. Petitioners-Kewal Krishan @ K.B. and Vikramjit @ Dara, have filed this petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code'), for quashing of FIR No. 53 dated 12.4.2008 registered at Police Station Gidderbaha, District Muktsar, under Sections 341, 307, 364, 511, 325 and 323/34 IPC and Sections 25, 27, 54 and 59 of the Arms Act, 1959 (Annexure P/1), order dated 9.1.2009 (Annexure P/2), charge sheet dated 9.1.2009 (Annexure P/3) and the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of the compromise dated 25.3.2010 (Annexure P/4), which, according to them, has been entered into with Baldev Kumar @ Deba-respondent No.2, who got lodged Crl. Misc. No. M-10676 of 2010 2 that FIR. After respondent No. 2 put in appearance in the court, he filed an affidavit in which he admitted the factum of the said compromise. The report of the trial court was called if the parties have voluntarily entered into the compromise in respect of the offences mentioned in the FIR and that report was to be made after recording their statements. The Presiding Officer, after recording the statements of the parties, has submitted his report, in which it has been mentioned that the parties have voluntarily entered into the compromise. It is very much clear from the compromise Ex. C1 that the same has been entered in respect of the offences mentioned in the FIR. All the offences so mentioned in the FIR are not compoundable under Section 320 of the Code . However, as was held by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Cr.) 1052, it was open to the parties to enter into compromise even in respect of those offences and the FIR can be quashed on the basis thereof. In view of the compromise so entered into between the parties, the above said FIR, the order and the charge sheet both dated 1.9.2009 and the subsequent proceedings are ordered to be quashed in respect of the petitioners. The petition is disposed of accordingly. September 6, 2010 (GURDEV SINGH ) prem JUDGE