IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.880 of 2011 MD. REHAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 11.01.11. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 03.09.2010 in a case registered under Section 392 of the I.P.C. but subsequently the case was converted into Sections 395 and 412 of the I.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the specific case of the informant is that there were only four miscreants who committed the offence in that circumstances in no way the case ought to have been subsequently registered under Section 395 of the I.P.C. It appears that on confession of the petitioner the Mobile was recovered which was subsequently identified during T.I. Parade. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has never been put on T.I. Parade. Moreover, the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and the statement to that effect has been made in paragraph no. 13 of the petition. Considering the nature of recovery, 2 period under custody and the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Kishanganj, in connection with Bahadurganj P.S. Case No. 73 of 2010. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)