IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 16TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 27TH MAGHA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 176 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER IN WA.2144/2008 Dated 08/07/2009 PETITIONER: PETITIONER IN W.A.NO.2144/08 ------------------------------------------- SREEDEVI, W/O.SUSEELAN PILLAI, SREEMANDIRAM, PAYYAMBRA ILLOM ROAD, PERUNNA EAST, CHANGANACHERRY, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON P.JOHN RESPONDENT: 3RD RESPONDENT IN W.A. ------------------------------------- JAICK JOSEPH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O.JOSEPH, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD (ROADS), KOTTAYAM. SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. MEERA. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMAN Ag. CJ & C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = CONT. CASE (C) 176 OF 2010 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = DATED THIS, THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2010. J U D G M E N T Raman, Ag. CJ. Alleging non compliance of the interim order passed on 8.7.2009 in W.A. 2144/2008, this contempt case is preferred. Since final judgment has been rendered subsequently on 13.1.2010, wherein reference is made to the interim order in para 13 of the judgment virtually, this interim order has been merged with the final judgment. 2. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks to withdraw this contempt. It is also pointed out that a review application is filed by him against the writ appeal judgment. In the circumstances, this contempt case is dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to proceed with the review or for filing a separate contempt case, in case the final judgment, if it is in his favour, is not complied with. P.R. RAMAN, (Ag. CHIEF JUSTICE) C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, (JUDGE). knc/-