:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 4946 OF PETITION NO. 4946 OF PETITION NO. 4946 OF 2008 2008 2008 Vishwanath Hari Randive. ... Petitioner. V/s. Smt. Sumitra Govind Bhosale & Ors. ... Respondents. Mr. A.A. Joshi for the Petitioner. Ms. Dipti Pawar i/b. S.S. Patwardhan for Respondents. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. 8TH 8TH 8TH MAY 2009. MAY 2009. MAY 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . While issuing notice on this Petition, the Court had clearly recorded the submission of the Petitioner’s Advocate that he does not challenge the order passed by the Trial Court (below Exhibit 20) in Regular Civil Suit No.68 of 2003 to the extent it appoints a Court Commissioner. The Petitioner seems to be really aggrieved by the fact that the Advocate has been appointed as a Court Commissioner. It is the submission that considering the assignment, the TILR (Taluka Inspector of Land Records) would be the proper authority. 2. Once the Petitioner’s Advocate does not dispute that the Commissioner deserves to be appointed but the only request is that TILR be appointed as a Commissioner, then, in my view, it would be appropriate if liberty is :2: granted to move the Trial Court and seek a modification of the impugned order to the extent that instead of Mr. M.R. Kale, Advocate, the Trial Court may be pleased to appoint the Taluka Inspector of Land Records as a Court Commissioner. I have no doubt in my mind that if such an Application is made, the Trial Court will consider it in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders thereon. Granting this liberty to the parties, this Petition is disposed off. (S.C. (S.C. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.)