i9"^^ ^§- % ...••-• y -:...^% i.^{3Q^^. \\ »*0(,)»• IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S) No. ^lc3 / SS! ^;^^ 188• ^ Mi,• PETITIONER .<^eD;c0^ fc^s" RESPONDENTS Nakul Singh Netam, S/o. Samaru Ram Netam, aged about"43 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. High. School- Jainpuri, Block Parasgaon, Distt. - (Bastar) (C.G.) VERSUS 2. 3. State of Chhattisgarh & Others Through- The Secretary, Depari:ment of Tribal Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Distt. -Jagdalpur ( Bastar) (C.( WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE DIRECTION ETC TODO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. • sa RB iiBS issa HISyCOURTOFCHHATnseARHATBILASPUR SIN6LE BEWH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. -A6NIHOTRI, J, W. P. (s) No. 7096 of 2006 Petitioner Respondents Awadhesh Kumar Pandey versus State of Chhatt-isgarh and others W P (s.l N0. 7097 of 2006 Petitioner Smt. Radheswari Patel versus Resppndents State of Chhattisgarh ond others W P (s.) N0. 7098 of 2006 Petitioner Smt. Mridula Jofar Respondents versus State of Chhattisgarh and others W P fs.) N0. 7099 of 2006 Petitioner Akhilesh Kumar Singh versus Respondents Stute of Chhattisgarh and others Petitioner WPfa.lNO. 7100 of 2006 Risabh Kii(mglr Jain versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and others Petitioner W P (s.) N0. 7101 of 2006 Smt. Anjali Mehra versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and others Petitioner W P (s.l N0. 7102 of 2006 6opal Dewangan versus ResDondents State of Chhattisgarh and others Petitioner And WPfs.l N0. 7103 of 2006 Nakul Singh Netam versus Respondents State of Chhatt-isgarh and o'tiiers Present : Mr. Anil Singh Rajput, counsel for the petitioners Miss Sunita Jain, Panel lawyer for -the State/respondents. OR D ER \th (Passed on this 20T" day of December, 2006) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as also for the State/respondents jointly submit -riiat the facts and question of law invotved jn the present writ petitions are squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kwnar Bharadwaj vs. Mwiicipal Corporation. Dwy and anothei^. 2. For 1+ie aforementioned reasons, the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the motter of Ycdiwant Kumar BharvdwaJ^Su'pw). subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.TJ. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and fur-t+ier whether they have been paid two advcince increments or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be ploced on the record of the connected writ petitions. Sd/- SatishK.As Judge Bd>fu 1 2006CtI)MPJK^696 •B