HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 3041 OF 2011 ORDER: The land of the petitioner in Survey No.201 of Damercherla Village was to be submerged in an irrigation project, viz., Bhairavuni Cheruv. Proceedings were initiated for acquisition of the land and award was passed. The interest was awarded at 4%. The petitioner filed WP No.17858 of 1995 challenging the award of interest at 4%. The writ petition was allowed by this Court on 14-09-1995 directing that the interest be awarded at 9%. The 2nd respondent filed WA No.1431 of 1997. Interim stay of the order in the writ petition was passed by this Court on 18-12-1997, on condition that the 2nd respondent deposits 50% of the amount awarded in the writ petition towards interest within a period of 8 weeks. The amount has since been deposited. 2. The writ appeal, together with the appeals that arose out of the decrees passed in the OP in respect of the land, was disposed of on 19-07-2002. The order in WP No.17858 of 1995 was upheld. 3. The petitioner filed EP No.93 of 2008 in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Miryalaguda for release of the amount under the decree. Since part of the amount was deposited with this Court, he filed EA No.1 of 2010 in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Miryalaguda with a request to call for the amount. The EA was ordered on 03-03-2010. The grievance of the petitioner is that the amount that was deposited with this Court has not been forwarded so far. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the 1st respondent. 5. In the context of the determination of the percentage of interest, the petitioner had approached this Court by filing a writ petition. The writ petition was allowed and it was held that the rate of interest must be at 9%. The 2nd respondent filed writ appeal and prayed for stay. While granting stay, this Court imposed a condition that the 50% of the amount towards interest as directed in the writ petition, shall be deposited to the credit of the writ appeal. It is not in dispute that the writ appeal has since been disposed of upholding the order in the writ petition. Therefore, the amount deposited by the 2nd respondent to the credit of the writ appeal must be forwarded to the executing Court to the credit of EP. 6. Hence, the Writ Petition is allowed and the 1st respondent is directed to forward the amount that was deposited to the credit of the WA No.1431 of 1997 to the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Miryalaguda to be deposited to the credit of EP No.93 of 2008 within a period of four (4) weeks from today. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J February 15, 2011. KTL