SiNBI-.E ifcN€li IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.fS.1 N0. iyV ~ /2010 PETITIONER ^w VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^f*"^ y-^ ^^ / Ghanshyam Naik S/o Shri Top Ram Naik, Aged about 33 years, Occupation Shiksha Karmi Grade-II, Govt. Middle School, Rokbahar, Block Pathalgaon, District : Jashpur (C.G.) 1. ' State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur District - ^ Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat Jashpur, District Jashpur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer, Jashpur, District Jashpur(C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Block Pathalgaon, Distt Jashpur(C.G.) WRIL PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC. The petitioner named above most humbly and respectfully begs to submit as under : II-HC-22 3TT^T-^T 'f^ri^'^nt^T 5h<-iich <Hfia ^acT -q|<q|<nq, ^Tll^^Ko, i®l<ni<rlll< s^l T^ra? ^.....14.^..^..^^^ HW^[ 5h^|cb •f^^T' ^ST^T'^^T^T'^TT S.B.: HON»BLEJUST2C®MR. PtITINKER DIWAK.ER 15-12-2010 Shri D.R,Patel, counselfor SIu-i Ajit Smgli, P.L. for the Grievance of tlie petitiouerj tlie petitioner wa.s iiiitially appoiit in tlie School Education depaitiut is entitled for two advarice mcrtmeuts been given to him. Couusel for tlie petitioner done his B,Ed. on 11,06.05 fr4ni Hindi Saliitya SaiameUaji, Allahabad at his own cost and 1|i advaace iiicreiiients. He subniN 15.6.2010 (Annexiire P/6) is pl autliority aiid at this stage, tlie m.ay be peroiitted t.o witlidi.'aw tl|iis peti.ti.on wi.th a direclion to the corsipetent azitli.ori.ty t.o decid the petitioner. Counsel for fhe pe|:itioner submits that the ord.er dated 29.4.2010 passed in Writ relying upon fhe judgnient of tlie| Asha Saxeaa Vs. State of M.P. ^ Osrs. 2009 (IIIJMPJR (SC| 59 aad the ord.er passed. by this Co' 87/2009, directions have been i^sued for consideration of tb-e case for grant of two advaace iii< 21.9.1974 issued by tlie Stat verifica.tion of the facts pleaded i£ ^I^Id^i^ '^[TR^Tf ^ ^S <f^^i< ^3;rf^Tq^Ti^T the petitioB.er. State. ra the present petition is fhat ted on tlie post. of Dy. Teacher ^nt on 11.07.08 ai.id tlxough. he biit. the saine has not •iibmits that the petitioner has b.erefore he is entitled ..for two th.at liis representation dated 'ndizi.g befoi'e tlie com.peteD.t ^urpose would be sen.^ed if h.e tlie penclm.g represeiitation of ,ppeal N0. 124/2009, wherem Supreine Court ia t'he case of |irt ra aiiofher Wrilt Appea]. No. Tements as per circular dated of Madhya Pradesh^ after the petitioii. [^ ^^ 3-.^ XI-HC-22 ^^2&]S5-; ^TT^T^T 'f^ri^'^nt^r 5h^i<^ ^f^a ^sr r^ii^id^, ^Tii^^Ko, f^<ni^^< an^r xra^ ^n^Rf[T5h^|ch '^ 200 'fN^T' ^TT^T'^HW^'H State counsel subinits fhat representation to the conceroef objection if aiiy direction is b^ representation ia accordaace witl^ Accordingly, tiie petitioner petitiion with Uberty to niake ^ autliority concemed. wifhiu a pej dafe of receipt of copy of this oi^ .fro.m the aufhorities concenied furtlier period of four m.onths accordauce wifh law. jis permitted to withdraw t'his fresh representation to the (riod of ftiree 'weeks' from fhe jler ao.d in t?im it is expected |to decide the same within. a fr|3io. the d.a.te of its .rcceipt, iu It is inade clear th.at this opixiion on inerits of fhe case woiild be at liberty to deci.de fhe ^ .stri.ctly iii a.ccordaD.c.e with law. 4)l<Llfd4lrl ^l^^l'^'fT^iP^^K '^<3ri^m3n^T ief tiie petitioner m.ake a fresh a.u.thori.fr^ an.d he h.as no Aio.g iss'aed for decidmg his law. Court ha.s not expressed aiiy ^n.d the a-iith.ori.ly conceiTi.ed ^preseutatiou of the petitjoner Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge -,J.-„. [^ -^yl