HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BEASPUR WRET ?ETITION (S) No. 4104 ofZGO9 Nilay Roy S/o Late Shri N.C.Roy, Aged about 34 years, Post Dresser (Class four employee) R10 Main Road, Borgaoz}, Block & Tehsil Keshkal, Disirict BastarCG. RES?QNDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretawg Public Heaith & Famiiy Welfare Departmem Ministry, D.K.S Buildizxg. Raipur, CG. PETITIONER VERSUS 2. The Directer, Directorate, Department of Health & Familv Welfare, Raiour, Disiriei Raipur C G 3. The éhief Medicall & Health Omcer: iaédalpur, Disiriot Bastar C .G. W’R TT 33F4T§TIOM I ,TNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUHON OF INDIA ~ SE: Eion’ble Shri Satish K. Agmhotri J. Shri Alok Dewangan, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy Government Advocate for the State. Present: gRDER (ORAL) (Passed on 06m day of August, 2009) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instractions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage, howevei; he seeks liberty to make a representation to the respondent—authorities, which may be considered and decided as expeditiousiy as possible and till the decision on the representation, the respondent authorities may be directed not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation within a period of three days from today. the same will be considered and decided Within a period oftwo weeks from the date of receipt ofthe representation. In View of foregoing, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication. 4 Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. it is made clear that no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner till representation or" the petitioner is decided. Anni l Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotrif Judge ‘