1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.8529/2009. : : Jitendra Kumar Vs. Union of India & Ors. : : Date of Order 22.7.2009 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr. M. K. Meena for the petitioner. This writ petition has been filed with the prayer that respondent-CRPF be directed to give appointment to the petitioner in the selection process for appointment on the post of Constable/GDR. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that lot of bungling took place in the selection process and those who were appointed were ultimately removed. Had fair selection taken place, petitioner would have secured appointment. It is submitted that petitioner came to know about this bungling only when his statement was recorded in the Criminal Court. In the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that writ petitions have been filed by the persons, who were illegally removed. On dismissal of such petitions, they filed special appeal before 2 Division Bench, which are pending. When the entire selection has been found to be tainted no direction for appointment on the basis of such selection can be issued. There is no debarring the petitioner from applying for appointment as and when fresh appointment took place. This writ petition even otherwise, has been filed with gross delay and latches. This writ petition is dismissed accordingly. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ)J. A.Arora/- Item No.87.