^ ® '••- • ^•^-O • '6 'O^-^ft ^:/I^ C'f'H'v. ^^AA'i IN THE HIGH COVRT OF M®HYAPRADE-SH AT JAB-AL^UT? ^ j3 C.oviVj. WRIT PSTCTION N0. <^"^-£>/ OF 1994 Deepak Kuinar Gupta s/o Shri Bholanath Giipta^ aged 36 years^ r/o Kalgana House^ Station Road^ Duxg^ Distt. Dur^(MP) ,,.PETITIONER VERSUS State of Ma.dhya E>radesh, Miner al T<e sources Departraent^ Througb ttts Secretary^ Vallabh Bhawan^ Bhopal <» The Collector^ Through its Mining Officer^ Dur g^ - Distt oDnrg ^ ».RESPONDE1TTS WRIT PE;TITION DTTDER ^T.ICLES 226 & 227 OF THS CONSTITLTnON OF INDIA XI-HC-22 3^T ^NId^, ^Tfl^41<o, fa^wy 311^1 <-|5(Cft ^ll^^l $b^l8cb »-----•--••- y^q^/ 200 W^T^T R^J4)3TT^T ^:[N)^cT ^i" ,^A. / ^J^ x^ ^^ 3T1^T^<fTW^?cT 12-7-2005 Mr. Yogesh Pandey, couns^ Mr. Ravi Ranjan Sinha, Par|el Heard both the counsel. This writ petition was fjl^d challenging the action of respon<|lent insisting for transit pass on transp^rtation this petition, the Stete Governme^ published the Mlneral Transit Pas^ in the Madhya Pradesh Gazette d^ted 26' In view of the above, spe|cifi< mineral transit pass regulations. The case of the petitioner these Regulattons, the respond^nts Accordingly, the ^titton stands dis il for the petitioner. Lawyer for the State/respondente. by the petitioner in the year 1994 No.2, whereby respondent No.2 was of minerals. However, after filing of tt vide notification dated 22nd June, 1996, Regulations, 1996, which were published ^ted 26th June, 1996. ^ific provision has been made regarding pe|cifi' chl^lId41T1 ^1^<^T^ te^ <fa<^.t< ~^3Tf^R'3Tl^r ^loes not sumve as under the authority of are entitled to ask for transit pass. ^missed. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge (<ft^y^)