-HC-22 SD^T^T R;-fi* s^s s»i*iict)^lf^a /'• h ~S:S( ^MM^, o-ul'y'is, I«(<yll+l'i< snt?T 'ira^? IIIICTI giWb •^ 200 |c|^t{8T' 311^1 •reiIWHfCT (Sinqle Bench; Hon'ble M<•. Justice Dhirendra Mishra) Writ Petitiori (Petition under Art.22(> of Constitution of India) PETmONERS RESPONOENTS Agd| P0stl Sec< -Versus- 1. d Vish^u Pratap Singh, S/o Shri Kamta Singh, |about 59 years, presently workin9 on the of Lecturer Government Higher [ndary School Udaipur, Distt. Surguja (C6) z. 3. 4. 5. 17.12.2008 • AAr. A.N; Pandey, Advocate for Mr. P. Shrivastava, Panel Lawye) Heard. Srievanceof the petitioner in Upper Ciivision Teacher in the year 19$( year 1982 his name was at Sr. No.29^. of Headmaster in the Middle Schooloh benefits as per Gircular dated t6.9.1S|94 teachers, who are workingagainst th^ <)il«i[CT<il'i iiinf 4 fs^ <fa+^l< i? 3if:aii SII^T Fsl No.7015/08 ^tate of ChhattiS9arh, Through ; The iecretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, t>.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.) 'he Cpmmissioner, Tribal Department pdipur,E)istt.Raipur(C.6.). 'he Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, lilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.6.). 'he Assistant Commissioner, Tribal (A/elfare, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C6) 'he Assistant Director, Tribal Welfare, l^mbikapur, Distt. Surguja (C6) he^petjtijoners. for the State. this petition is that he was appointed as .0 and in the gradation list prepared in the The petitioner was promoted on the post 6.9.1989, however,he has not been given (Annexure P-3) according. tQ'jafhich the post of Headmaster, were entitled for gll ^'7 XI-HC-22 311^1'W P;-li«t) 3(I^t '»i*i ^ifer -I- "3^ •^WId^, a>ii1ti<i6. .fai'iiyy ^(^?T 'tRra? *11*ICTI ShHlch Iq^a' loher the financial benefifs w.e.f. 1.4.19811 considering the notional seniority froiti juniors of the petitioner, whose riam4s petitioner, have been given notiona petitioneF has been deprived ofdboye Learned counsel for the petitio^i several representations for redressal have not been considered till date. Hel disposedof with liberty to the petitj respondent No.4 and in turn, respcjr representation within specified period^ Learned:counsel for the Stat4 fresh representation for redressalof| same shall be considered and decided o'fr'eGeipt ofthe Fepresentation, , In viewof the submissions macte petition is disposed of with libei^ty representation, raisin9 all the grievi certififcd copy of this order within a| No.4, and on such representation beirlg decided by the respondeht No.4 witk(i receipt of the representation. Certifiedcopyas per rules. cbW'CT*itt *i^<nT'^ f^1^ ^ReR ^ 3lf?OT 3D^[ and their salary would be fixed while e»f 1.4.1981 without back wages. Even the appear in the gradation list below the seniority w.e.f. l.4.1981, however, the t>enefit. submits that the petitioner has made jif his grievances since 1997 but the same |further submits that this petition may be joner to file fresh representation before jndent No.4 be directed to decide his submits that if the petitioners make a |his grievances, raised in this petition, the Iwithin a period of 6 weeks from the date by learned counsel for the parties, this to the petitioner to make fresh nces raised in this petition, along with week from today before the respondent made, the same shall be considered and n a period of 6 weeks from the date of Jud^e ^-