^ ^' iiti^iE b^»at , -l^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURTOFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) W.P.fARTICLE2271NO. Cr^^ 72008 PETITIONER PLAINTIFF /^^:::- ^!$^ ^l1'1''" RESPONDENTS DEFENDANTS .^s^s^ ^yy^y ^^ Smt. Jote Kunaiar, Wife of Baijnath Giri, D/o. Narayan Giri, aged about 55 years, R/o. Village Kpchila, P.S. Patna, Tahsil Baikunthpur, District Korea (C.G.) VERSUS Narayan Giri, Son of Mohan Giri, aged about 75 years, (Unsound Mind) Through : First CousinKarna Giri, Son of Bhagwat Giri, agedabout 60 ^-^ years, R/o. Village Chhindiyana, Tahsil Baikunthpur, District Korea (C.G.) Karna Giri @Karan Giri, aged about 60 years, Tulsi Giri, Son of Karna Giri, aged about 36 years, Kripal Giri, Son of Karna Giri, aged about 25 years, Respondent No. 2 to 4 R/o. Village Chhindiyafl^, Tahsil Baikunthpur, District Korea (C.G.) Ujjwaldatt Mishra Son of Shankar Datt Mishra, aged about 21 years, R/o. Village Patna, Tahsil Baikunthpur, District Korea (C.G.) '^- -^ijendra Kumar Son of Suresh Chand Agrawal, agedabout 32 years, R/o. Village Patna, Tahsil Baikunthpur, District Korea (C.G.) /7. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector Korea, District Korea (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT OR MANDAMUS/ CERTIORARI, ORDER/ ORDERS, DIRECTION/ DIRECTIONS ETC. .^l;T"%, /fa!%'^ T^r ^ii^id14, ^^i^i'Ko, fGi<ni^li< ^.P.C^^^'o .6 3 3^ | ^I^CTI W^ISW •(-"•^2008 a^^^Crt^f) ^^ ^T R'iJ4» WT^?^¥liPRW ^^TW^ft^a^T SB: JUSTICE Nj 16-07-2009 ^1^^'i WR^f ^ fe^ tN^YT ^3tfOT3TT^T :. Shri Vishnu Koshta, counsel fl Shrl Ashok Kumar Shukfa, coi| Shri Satlsh' Gupta, Sovt/Adycj With the consent of the part| The instunt petition is directe )r the petitioner. for respondent No.l to 6. [cate for the'Respondent No,7/State. IBS, the matl^r is heard fInaIJy, |d agGinst the order dated 29-09-2008 by Civil Judge/Class-II, B4ikunthpur, &istrlct Koria in Civi! Suit No,44-^/2007 whereby and whereipnder the appiication under Order 32 [Rule 3 R/2 Ruie 15 of the CPC fj!e^ by the petitioner/plaintjff herein to appoint respondent No,2 as guaitdian .to defendant No,l; has Idismissed, The brief facts of the case d |nst.ituted a suit ctaiming reiief of ^efendants, As per the petitioner/j^ |jnsound mind and, therefore, he prej Rule 3 read with Rule 15 of thel iroposing the of defendant NoJ re that the plain+iff. petitioner herej.n ^ecJaratlon and injunction against the iaintiff, defendant no. 1 is a.person of perred the appiicatjon under Order 32 C.P,C< • for appointment of guardian |2, for defendant No,l, ^w^^^^ww <r'5[.ri^t^—s;s/95—i i /2003-1,00,000. //"' w j% i 1 ftl^t^.^ ^- i. ?. <. .^' '^ lfe, wf" X^- HC— "' 8. -^H ^|^|^4, ^Tll^4TS/Mrll^y ^).(P. C^>)A/o ^SI^ :W<T?1T^^8^ "H^ 2008- 3T?^ ^^ (^t^^^) . ^^TT?T w. r^^" I 'f^T ^TT ^IT^ | •^mw mN >^T^T The appjication was opposed |by the defendants, Thereafter, triai Court without conductjng any sumr^ary enquiry in this regard, diSaTiissed the appiication of the petitioner. Shri Koshta, learned counseil order passed by the Trial Court is| has been passed without'concJucting any enquiry as provided under Order 32 Rule 15 of the C.P.C. Per contra, Shri ^shok i^umar Shukia, iearned counse! for respondents N0, 1 to 6 supported jany enquiry regarding unsoundness o^ pre-requirement before passing the In view of the above, the o ^^ft^Nt^ "RT^ff ^ fet^t TT^gT' ^ 3:tfW 3?T^T for the petitioner submlts that the v^lthout jurisdjction inasmuch as the |+ie impugned order and submits that the defendant No.l is not a person of unsound mind. After hearing ieGrned couns^l for the parties and perusing the record and impugned award, it is cle|ir that Triai Court has not conducted otherwise of Defendant NoJ whjch is order as per order 32 Ruie 15 of the C,P,C. Therefore, the order suf|fers from procedural iji.egality and therefore, deserves to be set aside, •der impugned is set aslde It is directed that the Trial Court shaj!! hear the appijcation fifed by the Ipetitioner afresh after conducting j summary enquiry in this regard l^ '@Sl®Bfe- '^ ^ .c <fc.--'^l-HC—-8 '^'. ''y~-y WH^f WW^ T^? ^i^Kn^. ^Ttl^4!^, Mrii^y ^./>C)-^>)^.^3>^j ^ 200 5- 3?!^T a^^ ('I^t^^) -TT^T ^T TTrT:F "W "HT^T 5F^fNF Kvr "rEmw '??fN -^T^T s' thereafter, shGJI pass the order in ^ccordance with Jaw after hearing both the parties. No orderas to costs. Sd/- N.K.Agarwal Judge ^:.-?^T3^ T?pq^ff ^ f^zt 'Tr^?^TT ^r •3t^R '3T[^T