IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4909 of 2009 PRABHAT SHUKLA @ CHHOTAN SHUKLA @ MUKHIYA SON OF BINDO SHUKLA @ BINDESHWAR SHUKLA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAIS,P.S.PANDARAK,DISTRICT PATNA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 23.3.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered for offences under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code regarding killing of informant’s son Rajesh Kumar alias Raju. Submission is that in course of investigation, some witnesses have been examined under Section 164 of the Indian Penal Code and they have named the petitioner and others but it has been argued that it is not clear as to why the petitioner and others were not named in the written report when the witnesses have seen the occurrence. Further submission is that considering this argument, some similarly situated co-accused have been granted bail by different orders of this court Vide Cr.Misc.Nos. 23435 of 2008 and 26333 of 2008 on 29.7.2008 and 16.7.2008 respectively. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge III, Barh in Sessions Trial No. 2583 of 2008. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)