HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 3905 of2008 PETITIONER : Anil Kumar Sinhag S/o Late B.P.Sinha, aged abaut 58 years, Head Master, Tribal Welfare; Mmdle School Kma. Post Oiflce Nawanagar, Block — Nubikapur Police Statlon, Damna, Tamil Amblkapur Dlstnct Surgu‘pa (C G) ‘ VERSUS RESPONDENTS’ : l. State of Chhamsgarh through the Secretary: Tribal Welfare Department, D K S Bhawan, Raipiir (C G ) 2. The Commissmner Tnbal Weltare Department, Rmpm (C G) . 3. The Ass1stant Commissioner Tribal Welfare _ Ambmapur Distnct Suiguja (C G) a l 4. The Block Educwon Officer, Ambrkapur Dlstnct Surguja (C G ) WRIT PETITION UNDER AR I‘ICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. I Present: Shn Mano; Mnshra, Advocate tor the petmoner Slm Y S Thalmr Deputy Advocate General With Ms Sumta Jam, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents ORAL ORDER (Passed on 23iaday of July 2008) , With the consent of learned counsel appeanng for the partms, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits tha the petitioner does not want to press this petition on merits at this stage. However, the respondent- authorities may be directed to consider and decide the pending representation ‘dated 24.07.2007 (Annexure P/13), in accordance with law: as expeditiously as possible. Shri Thakur, learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that there is no reason asto why the representation of the petitioner as stated above should not be considered expeditiously. 4. Shri Thakur submits that the above-stated representation shall be considered and dectded by the concerned authority, in accordance With law, on its own ments Within a period ot eight weeks ii'om the date ofreceipt ot a copy ofthis order 5. In view of the clear statement made by the leaned counsel appearmg for the State/respondents this petition accordingly stands disposed of No order asto . . Sd/_ Satish K. Agnihctri Judge ,