IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN THURSDAY, THE 19TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 28TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 31993 of 2009(T) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- SHIBITHA PUSHPAN, D/O. PUSHPAN, KUTTIKAD HOUSE, CHITTATTUKARA, VADAKKEKARA, N.PARUR. BY ADV. MR.P.K.ANIL RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REP. BY ITS VICE CHANCELLOR, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. MR.T.A.SHAJI, SC FOR M.G. UTY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss P.N.RAVINDRAN,J. ---------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.31993 of 2009 - T ---------------------------------------- Dated 19th November, 2009 Judgment The petitioner appeared for the combined first and second semester B.Tech. degree examination conducted by the Mahatma Gandhi University in April/May, 2009. The results were published in September, 2009. It is submitted that a copy of the mark list was furnished to the petitioner on 17.9.2009. The petitioner failed in 'Engineering Mechanics'. She has therefore applied for revaluation of her answer script by submitting an application on 1.10.2009. Though a copy of the application for revaluation is not produced, the petitioner has produced the receipt evidencing payment of the fee for revaluation on 1.10.2009. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious revaluation of her answer script. 2. Sri. T.A.Shaji, the learned standing counsel appearing for the Mahatma Gandhi University submits that the University will take steps to verify whether the petitioner has applied for W.P.(C) No.31993/2009 2 revaluation and if on such verification it is found that the petitioner has applied for revaluation in time, take expeditious steps to revalue her answer script and to communicate the result to her. In the light of the said submission, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to verify whether the petitioner has applied for revaluation and if on such verification, it is found that she has applied for revaluation in time, take expeditious steps to revalue her answer script and to communicate the result to her within two months from the date on which the petitioner produces a certified copy of this judgment before the second respondent. P.N.RAVINDRAN Judge vaa