^. 'X11 •StMGtE BENCi IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^CHHATTISGARHI WRIT PETITION N0.3T-87 OF 2006 PETITIQNER:- ^,•?<" ..•••^.'3<;^s-'' .--"^%\^- ^ ...''I \<!-'' -L^ '^.' A'11' '.**' '^ «.* s^ ..-•• ^'^•- ^?t.fc" Badri Prasad Kashyap Aged about 52 years, S/o- Chandrika Prasad Kashyap, Time Keeper, Daily wages Worker, Water Resources Department Sub Division Baloudabazar, R/o Village -Bharuwadih, Tehsil - Baloudabazar Distt- R.aipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS :1) 2) 3) 4) State of C.G. Through the Secretary, Imgation Department D.K.S. Bhawan Mantralay Raipur (C.G.) Chief Executive Engineer, Irrigation Department Raipur (C.G.) Executive Officer, Irrigation Construction Department, Raipur(C.G.) Sub Divisional Officer, Balaudbazar Distt- Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE mNSTTTUTION OF INDIA, XI-HC-78 wtwr awrai 3:S? •^WW'tl, WlS\V'IG, Rldldy ^.W^...URz[..?^. ®) ^ 200 3T1^?TMacn (yii^si<,ir) sn^rwf^iRi aw aii^r §CTW c • t'--.- ^^' ''tfc' ^ ' gTtnWHf^cTW^T 3.8.2006 Advdcate petitjoner Sr challei^ged pcti|tioner nd>t subibits Heard Mr. Ashok Soni, Miss Dipali Pandey, P.L. for| By this petition the employee on the post of Tiinekeep^i Division Baloda Bazar, has (Annexure P-1) whereby he has t^ Imgation Department, Sub Divisiofi Leamed counsel for the low paid employee and he ought of 300 kms. The petitioner bein^ appointed for a particular office, another offlce. He further petitioner may be allcwed to make] No.2 and in tum, respondent N<t which leamed counsel for the Statfc Having heard leamed ooun^ the facts and circumstanoes of on the merit of the case, the representatlon raising all the respondent No.2 within a period| respondent No.2 to decide the objective manner within a period representation after considering alp in accordance with law. With the direction aforesaidl C-onsequently, M.(W,)P, No,: Certified oopy as per rules. »i<itCT<)1-iiitinTiftetA<,Ri<^i<, ^aTf^rsn^r <t for the petitioner. ^he State on advance oopy. bner, who is working as daily wage in Water Resources Department, Sub the transfer order dated 30.6,2006 teen transferred from Baloda Bazar to Deybhog. submitted that the petitioner is a to have been transferred at a distance a daily wage employee, he has been therefore, he cannot be transferred to that in the oircumstances, the a detailed representation to respondent i.2 be directed to decide the same, to 3 has no objccticm. lel for the parties and hawing regard to case, without esq^ressing any opinion is allowed to make a detafled along with copy of this petition to of ten days from today and in tum, •epresentation of ths petitioner in an of 30 days from the date of receipt ef the grievances raised by the petitioner the petition stands disposed of. i947/06 also stands disposed cL . ' Sd/- -L.C.Bha< Judge tHe pe^itioner gnev^nces te