(\^z ^D H!GH COURT QF CHHATTjSQARH : BILASPUR WRST PETjTION N0. OF PETmONER. REBPONDENTS 2. Janklda-s, S/'o Late Shri Ba?ak Das Manjkpuri, R/o VIIIage - Senduras, P.C, Circle - 21, Tahslj -• BJIajgarh, District - Raipur (C.G.), aged about 60 years, present address : - Block 10 B, Street - 18, Sector - 5, Bhiiai, District - Durg (C.G.) Versus State of Chhattisgarh, through Seoretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Rajpur. Lilaram, S/o Baliram, R/o Senduras, P.C. Clrcle - 21, Tahsll - Bilasigarh, Dlstrict ~ Ralpur. AA;rit petitjon iincler Artjcie 226^227 of the Constitution of India) SjnQSe Bench : Hon'bJe Shrl K. Agnihotri, J. Present: • Shri Somkant Verma. counsel for the petltioner. Shri AJok Bakshi, Govt. Advocate forthe respondent No.1. ORAL (Passed on this 8 day of December, 2008) 1) The petitioner has fjled this petition challenging the order dated 2712.2004 (Annexure P/6), passed by the Sub DJvisJonal Officer (Reveriue), Bllaigarh, District - Raipur. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petjtioner submits that the petitjoner js in possession of the iands, which were 'm possession of his predecessors. The possession of the lands in question has beert unjnterrupted and contlnuous. The petltloner cSai.ms Bhoomlswamj rights over the Sands, which have been granted by the competent authority to hls predecessors prlor to 1 950. 3) Learned counsel for the petitloner submits that the and question of law involved jn this petition as well as the reiief sought are simjjar to that of in W.P.No.341 of 2002 (Fatte Singh and others vs. The of Chhattisgarh & others), which Was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 22 Februar/, 2007, in the foSlowing torms : - ^ "In the result, this petition is djsposed of with the directj'on that the oornpetent authority shal? consider the case of the petitioners for grant of Bhoomiswamj right, 'm accordance with law after affordlng proper opportundy of hearing to the concemed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order/' 4) Learned counsel appearing for the further the responclent/State rnay be directed to o.onslder and deolde the c-ase of the petltjoner In the llght of the judgmerst and order by this Court in the matter of Fatte Singh (supra) to which learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection. 5) In vlew of the above, this petition stands disposed with the direction to the respondent/State to consjder and dedde the case of the petltioner in the light of the order dated 22-2-2007, paissed by this Court In the matter of Fatte Singh (supra). No order asto costs. Thakur Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge