IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH G.S.T.R. No. 46 of 2003 Date of decision: May 5, 2009 M/s Bata India Ltd., Faridabad ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. BHALLA Present: None. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M.KUMAR, J. This matter is pending since 9.6.2005, when the Tribunal after accepting the application filed by the dealer-petitioner under Section 42 of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973, has referred various questions of law for the opinion of this Court. Despite the fact that the service is complete and the matter has been listed a number of times, nobody has put in appearance on behalf of the dealer-petitioner. Accordingly, we are left with no option but to return the reference un-answered because neither the counsel for the petitioner has appeared nor the petitioner has shown any interest. (M.M.KUMAR) JUDGE (H.S. BHALLA) May 5, 2009 JUDGE Pkapoor