THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B PRAKASH RAO C R P NO. 1370 OF 2010 ORDER: The petitioner who is plaintiff seeks to assail the order rejecting an application where h sought for reopening of the evidence and for allowing him to lead further evidence, however, the court below did not find favour and dismissed the same mainly on the ground that no particulars are forthcoming. Hence, the revision. Having heard the learned counsel for petitioner and on perusal of the material available on record, especially in view of the fact that the learned counsel for petitioner states that he has to produce some more witnesses and no opportunity was given to adduce further evidence while eschewing the evidence of P W 3, would not itself shut-out and opportunity needs to be given to producing of such evidence. In view of the same, liberty is granted to petitioner to file an appropriate application once again for allowing him to produce further evidence, on filing any such application, the same shall be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law. Subject to above the revision petition is disposed of. No costs. _______________ B PRAKASH RAO,J DATE: 26.3.2010 TVK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B PRAKASH RAO C R P NO. 1370 OF 2010 DATE: 26.3.2010