CWP No. 278 of 2007. 6.5.2009. Present: Mr.G.R. Palsra, counsel for the petitioner. Mr.R.K.Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr.R.M. Bisht and Mr.Rajesh Mandhotra, Dy.A.Gs., for respondents No.1 to 3. The petitioner, by means of this writ petition, has prayed that he be awarded compensation of Rs.20.00 lacs. The basis of the claim is that respondent No.2 was negligent while treating the petitioner. The allegations against respondent No.3 are that since he was the Head of Department of the concerned Department, he should have supervised the treatment. These allegations have been denied by the respondents. These disputed questions of fact cannot be decided in a writ petition. The remedy, if any, of the petitioner lies before some other forum but these questions cannot definitely be decided in writ proceedings. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed with liberty reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum. In view of the final disposal of the main writ petition, all the pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Deepak Gupta), Judge . May 6, 2009. (V.K. Ahuja), (TILAK) Judge.