IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P.(T) No. : 8341 of 2008. Decided on: 3rd December, 2010. ____________________________________________________ Hari Nath. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. D.K. Khanna, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge(Oral): Petitioner was engaged as Beldar in the year 1996. The case of the petitioner, in a nut-shell, is that his services were required to be regularized after completion of requisite number of years. However, it has come in the reply filed by the respondents that the petitioner had not completed 160 days in 1996 and 2000. 2. Mr. D.K. Khanna, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client is still working with the respondent- department and has completed requisite number of years with 160 days in each calander year. If that is so, the respondents are directed to consider the case of petitioner for regularization, strictly in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. 3. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the petition stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 03, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. - 2 - - 3 -