IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27286 of 2009 1. PINTU PANDEY ALIASAMIT KUMAR PANDEY 2. PINTU TIWARY ALIAS RAJESH TIWARI ------------------------- petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 3.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that though petitioners are named in the F.I.R. but only as associates of the main assailant Ajit Kumar Pandey. There is land dispute in between the petitioners and the informant. The deceased has no occasion to sleep on the upper flour of the informant’s house other than his having illicit relation with the informant. If that is taken into consideration, petitioners’ rejection of anticipatory bail cannot be justified in name of their being absconders while they always remained in contact with police officials for fair investigation. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur (Bhabua) in Bhabua (Sonhan) P.S.Case No. 200/2001, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. A.I (Mandhata Singh, J.)