IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.31 of 2007 JADU NANDAN, son of Late Shanti Giri, resident of village and P.O. Bhathua Bhjurag, P.S. – Sarai Ranjan, District- Samastipur. ……………………………………………………. Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary, Department of Finance, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The District Magistrate, Samastipur. 3. The Treasury Officer, Samastipur. 4. The Branch Manager, Central Bank of India, Sarai Ranjan Branch, District Samastipur. …………………………………………………….. Respondents ----------- For the petitioner – Dileep Kumar Jha, Adv. For the Bank - Mr.Ajay Kumar Sinha. For the State – Abhay Shankar Jha, S.C. IV Shailendra Kumar Jha, J.C. to S.C. 9 2 09.02.2009 The petitioner retired as Mali from government service in U.P in the year 1997. His pension is being paid through Central Bank of India Sarai Ranjan Branch, Samastipur. He has come to this Court notwithstanding revision of pension as approved by the Accountant General, Bihar and U.P. The Bank is not being authorized for the revised pension and is making unauthorized deduction. In my view, let the petitioner detail representation in this regard to the Accountant General, Bihar pointing out his grievances who would get the matter examine and pass necessary orders directing the Central Bank of India to take appropriate actions in that regard. If it is found that any money is due and payable to the petitioner or if it is found that the deductions are wrongly being made by the Bank. The Accountant General would direct the Bank to make necessary amounts and the Bank would be bound to obey the same and complete with it within one month of receipt of communication from Accountant General. The Accountant General would dispose of the representation of the petitioner which should be filed in detail within one - 2 - month of petitioner filing the said representation. With this observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed off. Kundan (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)