IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.105 of 2007 1. INDRA DEVI w/o Mahendra Yadav 2. Mahendra Yadav s/o Faujdar Yadav Both residents of village Gopipatti, Dhadhiya, P.S. Kamtaul, District- Darbhanga. ….Petitioners/petitioners Versus 1. DEVENDRA SHARMA s/o Mukhlal Sharma ….O.P. 1st party/respondent 1st party 2. Raman Kumar Yadav s/o Buchhi Yadav …O. P. 2nd party/respondent 2nd party Both r/o vill. Gopipatti, Dhadhiya, P.S.- Kamtaul, Distt. Darbhanga. 3. M/s The National Insurance Company Ltd. having its Branch office at Mohalla Senapath, Distt.- Darbhanga …O.P. 3rd party/ respondent 3rd party For the petitioners Mr. Shiva Shankar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vinod Kumar, Adv. For the respondents Mr. V. N. P. Sinha (Sr. Adv.) Mr. Yugal Kishore, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Adv. ----------- 2. 22.06.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the opposite parties. This civil revision has been filed by the petitioners challenging order dated 30.10.2006 by which Claim Tribunal-cum- District Judge, Darbhanga rejected the petition dated 12.4.2006 filed by the petitioners for amendment in their main petition of Claim Case No. 35 of 2003. From the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and the materials 2 on record, it is quite apparent that the learned court below has considered the entire matter in detail and only thereafter came to the conclusion that the copies of the FIR, charge-sheet and post- mortem report clearly show that autopsy was done on the dead body of Ravindra Yadav and hence it was found that in fact Ravindra Yadav had died in motor vehicle accident on 12.5.2003 and it was not Devendra Yadav. Thus the amendment sought was quite unjustified. In the facts and circumstances, I find no jurisdictional error in the impugned order of the learned court below nor any illegality in the same. Accordingly, this civil revision is dismissed. kanchan ( S. N. Hussain, J.)