IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R.No.4852 of 2010 Date of Decision : 4.8.2010 Charan Singh ....Petitioner Versus Krishan Pal and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Roopak Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. There is no legal infirmity in the impugned order. The prayer of the petitioner for being impleaded as a party has been declined in a suit which is preferred by respondent No.1 for enforcement of an agreement to sell in his favour. The petitioner likewise contends that he also has an agreement to sell in his favour regarding the same property. In this eventuality the petitioner has a distinct and separate cause of action than that of respondent No.1 who has preferred the suit. He thus is not a necessary party in the proceedings pending before the trial Court. Besides the petitioner is always a dominus litus and can choose the parties he wishes to proceed against in a litigation and the petitioner has no right to compel him to implead him as a party. C.R.No.4852 of 2010 -2- No merit. Dismissed. 4.8.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss