IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 20TH DECEMBER 2011 / 29TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 32777 of 2010(V) -------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- ROSAMMA GEORGE, AGED 39 YEARS, W/O. DR.MONICHAN K.K., TEACHER (TERMINATED), MARIAN SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL, K.K.ROAD, KALATHIPADY, VADAVATHOOR P.O., KOTTAYAM-686 010, RESIDING AT EDAKKARI HOUSE, MANNANAM P.O., KOTTAYAM-686 561. BY ADVS. SRI.H.B.SHENOY SRI.B.ASHOK SHENOY SMT.LAKSHMI B.SHENOY SRI.ABU MATHEW SRI.SOBHAN GEORGE SRI.K.V.GEORGE RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SHIKSHA KENDRA 2, COMMUNITY CENTRE, PREET VIHAR, NEW DELHI-110 092. 2. MARIAN SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL, K.K.ROAD, KALATHIPADY, VADAVATHOOR P.O., KOTTAYAM-686 010. 3. T.THOMAS EDUCATIONAL TRUST, REPRESENTED BY ITS CORRESPONDENT & SECRETARY, ST.MARY'S SCHOOLS & COLLEGE, ST.MARY'S ROAD, PERAMBUR, CHENNAI - 600 011. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM FOR R2 & R3. SRI. DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN FOR R1. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No.32777/2010 A P P E N D I X PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT. P1 : COPY OF REPRESENTATION DTD. 16.9.10 SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER TO R1. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. // True Copy // P.A. to Judge. smp T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.32777 OF 2010 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of December, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner herein is seeking for a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P1 representation. The petitioner was working as Teacher for Computer Science in the 2nd respondent School which is run by the 3rd respondent Trust. It is averred in the writ petition that she was working from 16.11.2005 against a permanent and regular vacancy. The petitioner's service has been terminated, according to the petitioner, illegally by the 2nd respondent and the same is effected from the beginning of the academic year 2010- 2011. 2. Learned counsel for the 2nd respondent has taken the stand that the CBSE namely, the 1st respondent has no power to interfere in such matters. I am not going into the merits of the contentions of the parties herein. It is upto the 1st respondent to consider and pass W.P.(C) No.32777/2010 2 orders on Ext.P1, with notice to the petitioner and the respondents 2 and 3. It is open to the respondents 2 and 3 to raise all their contentions including the contention that the 1st respondent is not having any power to interfere in such matters. Appropriate decision will be taken by the 1st respondent within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. This writ petition is disposed of as above. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp