Vb‘ml My s» —y §o ¢5z '1‘ Low lswgiawag Vi? mHitwniygggyyggynmu 3 w? (9) 74 7/0 g BEFORE THE 'MAE‘IYA FRADEQ’i REAL AT JABALPUR. .w«P51/LQL ‘¥éx§?/O5 0.x; Nola» J ‘of 1993 BETWEEN Diaesh Kumar Khandelmi f Sri'shankerlal Khaadelwal, and three oers o c‘n wHgICMTS AND The State of Madhya Pradesh mmugh the Secretary, Public Works Deparment and Qmex'sx .3“ HB$?®JDEJ T3 ; APPLICATICN UNDER SEggw ;g ca: m3, Ammsmanva TRmUNALs‘ MT, agggg; m v mm h th 1mm mum WPQ.) (M7 W20 3mm (W) WWW§w aiWanéel mamm wmam mm 111%?! amt Sinha SB: Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. 21.01.2010 When the matter was called for hearing, none appeared for the petitioner and the matt round, none appears for th petitioner. Shn' Arvind Dubey, P Taking into conside tion the nature of controversy involved is dismissed for want of prosecution, ioner to revive the petition if the cause r was passed over. Even in the second e1 Lawyer for the State] respondent. Izr L. in this petition, the petiu‘o reserving liberty to. the peti1 of action still survives. Copy ofthis order be ‘