THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L. NAGESWARA RAO C.R.P.No. 4384 of 2005 Dated: 10-06-2011 Between: S.R.Gopal Reddy .. Petitioner And Nayeemunnisa Begum and others .. Respondents This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L. NAGESWARA RAO C.R.P.No. 4384 of 2005 ORDER: The revision petitioner is the 1st respondent in O.P.No.214 of 1995, which was an accident claim. As there was no proper insurance, the liability was fixed to the 1st respondent and a decree was passed on 12.11.2002. Subsequently, the revision petitioner has filed the application to condone the delay of 624 days to set aside the ex parte decree and the lower Court did not find any merits for the condonation of the delay and dismissed the application. As can be seen from the order of the lower Court, the revision petitioner was served with notices on 30.09.1996 and subsequently he was set ex parte. Therefore, when before passing of the decree itself the petitioner was served with the notices, the petitioner did not choose to contest, but when the decree was passed holding that the insurance company is not liable and the revision petitioner alone is liable, the present application is filed. The lower Court has considered the conduct of the revision petitioner and the reasons given by the revision petitioner for condonation of the delay are not proper and sufficient cause is not shown and I do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the lower Court. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. ________________________ N.R.L. NAGESWARA RAO, J Date: 10-06-2011 MR THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L. NAGESWARA RAO C.R.P.No. 4384 of 2005 10-06-2011 MR