C-482 No. 276 of 2009 Hon'ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard Sri Lok Pal Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri H.C. Pujari, learned Additional Government Advocate, for the State. By means of this petition, moved under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 03.05.2008, passed by Judicial Magistrate, Laksar, and order dated 06.12.2008, passed by Sessions Judge, Haridwar. By the impugned order, passed by Judicial Magistrate, the application, moved under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., has been rejected by the court. The reasons are mentioned for rejection of the application. The petitioner / complainant appears to be aggrieved by the alleged erroneous entries in the family register. Since the Opposite Party Nos. 2 and 3 are Village Pradhan and Secretary, Village Panchayat, respectively, who work under the Block Development Officer, the Magistrate has directed the complainant to first approach the superior authority for redressal of his grievances. The Magistrates are not required to send the applications, moved under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. for investigation in a routine manner without application of mind. This Court does not find any error of law committed by the Magistrate or by the revisional court, who dismissed the revision, filed by the complainant. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after going through the papers on record, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned orders. The petition, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., is dismissed summarily. (P.C.P., J.) 13.04.2009 NS