IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 1199 of 2002 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 04/07/2002 in WP NO : 11923 OF 2002 on the file of the High Court.) Between: M/s Kothari Industrial Corporation Limited (Incorporated under the Companies Act 1956) Kothari Buildings, No.114, M.G.Salai Nungambakkam, Chennai-34 Rep. by its Chief Executive (Persnl. Admn. & Legal) ..... APPELLANT AND 1 State of A.P., rep.by its Prl. Secretary Revenue (Ex.III) Dept., Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad 2 The Secretary, Department of Prohibition and Excise Govt. of A.P., Hyderabad 3 Commissioner of Industries Govt. of A.P., Chirag Ali Lane, Hyderabad 4 Commissioner of Proh. & Excise Govt. of A.P., Hyderabad 5 Director of Distilleries & Breweries Govt. of A.P., Nampally, Hyderabad 6 A.P.Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited Zonal Office, Industrial Estate, Patancheru, Medak District .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant:MR.M.N.SRINIVASAN Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court made the following : JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari ) On 19.1.2009, when the appeal was called, learned counsel for the appellant was absent. Hence, the appeal was posted today under the caption for dismissal. Even today, when the appeal is called, learned counsel for the appellant is not present. Consequently, the Writ Appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to costs. _____________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari _________________________ Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy January 20, 2009 MAS