:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.166 OF 2004 CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.166 OF 2004 CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.166 OF 2004 Rajendra Mughendra Patil ...Applicant. v. Kusum Mughendra Patil & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.S.S.Patwardhan , adv. for the Applicant. Mr.Umesh Mankapure , adv. for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 28th April, 2008. DATE: 28th April, 2008. DATE: 28th April, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. After some discussion at the bar, with consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the impugned order is hereby set aside and question of pecuniary jurisdiction of the Civil Judge Junior Division is left open to be considered and decided after hearing the evidence of both the parties for final disposal of the suit. Plaintiff/respondent shall not press the application for interim relief before the trial Court. As the plaintif/respondent is a senior citizen and a woman aged about more than 70 years and as the suit itself is about four years old, the trial Court shall expedite the hearing of the suit and dispose it off as early as possible and preferably within six months from this day. This Court has not expressed any opinion over the merits of the case. :2: (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)