Misc. App. No. 359 / 2010 In WPCRL No. 707 of 2009 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate present for the petitioners. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State present for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate present for respondent No. 3. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have sought quashing of the first information report / crime No. 148 of 2009, relating to offences punishable under Section 498-A, 323 of I.P.C., and one punishable under Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, police station Kankhal, District Haridwar. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the parties state that the parties to the matrimony have entered into compromise. And the complainant, respondent No. 3 Damini Saini is present in person before this Court, who has no objection if the first information report and its investigation, is quashed. In view of the principle of law laid down in B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another, (2003) 4 Supreme Court Cases 675, this writ petition, in the above circumstances, is allowed, and the impugned first information report No. 148 of 2009, relating to offences punishable under Section 498-A, 323 of I.P.C., and one punishable under Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, police station Kankhal, District Haridwar, lodged against the petitioners, is hereby quashed. (Misc. Application No. 359 of 2010 also stands disposed of). (P.C. P., J.) 10.02.2010 HN