STITI S. Khalkho, S/o Late B. Khalkho, Aged about 59 years 5 nionths, Presently working as Sub-Divisional (Forest) Officer, Janakpur, Forest Division Manendragarh, Distt. Koria (C.G.j 1 State of Chhattisgarh - Through the Secretar^r, Forest Department, DKS Bhawaa, Raipur(C.G.) The Under . Secretar}r, State of Chhattisgai'h, Forest DepartmLeat, DKS Bhawan, Raipiu- (C.G.) 3 Shri Vinod Kiunai' Saliu, Depuly Maaagiag Director, District Union, Laghu Vanopaj Saugh, Dharailljaigarh, Forest Diyision Raigarh, Distt. Raigarll (C.G.) Shri P. Diwarkar, Sr. Advocate wifh Shri Ashish Suraiia, counsel for fhe petitioner. Shri Ajviud Dubey, Panel Lawyer for fhe State/ respondents No. 1 & 2 ofadvan.ee copy. t- Heard on adiaission. The petitioner, who is presently workmg on flie post of Sub-DMsional Officer (Forest), Janakpur, Forest Division Maaendragarh, District Koria, has beeii transfen~ed to Distnct Union, Laghu Vanopaj Sangh, Dharaaija^'arh, Forest Division, Raigarh. Ainong other grouuds, leamed counsel for the petitioner niamly raises the ground tiiat fhe petitioner is at the verge of superannuation, who has to retire on 28.2.2008. He subaaits that practicaUy, an einployee, who has to retire wifhin a short period, facesgreat hardship, ifbe is tt~ansferred iii such situatioa. He subm.its fhat fhe rights of such einployees have been o \y ¥- W.P.(S) No. 4325/2007 protected by fhe policy of the State, whicli was fraiaed on 13th Jiine, 2007, copy ofwhicli has been fUed as Annexure-P/2. He draws niy attention towards clause 7, which is quoted as uiider: "7.f^r ?nwN m^j- ^t ^qiFi^ ^ f^ji? 1 q^ cCT W?? ^? ^?? TTOT ?T, ^^15 f^ ^ 3T&TiT ^ f^yCT -^ f^ ^ ?q^e.T telT ^T ^NT, ?)f^ HWq y?l^ ^T;I ^ ST^TR ??? STgfq ?t 1" Having gone through fhe contents of fhe petition aad after hearing fhe arguiiieats advanced by learaed coiuiscl for the petitioaer, I am ofthe opinion that fhe ends ofjiistice would be seryed, if fhe petitioner is directed to file a representation before tlie concenied authority and fhe conceraed authority is directed to dispose of fhe same at the earUest, lookmg to tfae grievance raised by the petitioner. Consequenfly, fhe petition is disposed of -with directioii to the petitioner fhat if so advised, Iie inay file a detaiied representation before the conceraed aiifhority wifiurt a period of 15 days frow. today aloiig wifh certified copy of fhis order aad tlie copy of -ivrit petitioii and if such a representatioQ is fUed, it sliaU be decided by the concemed autliority within a further period of60 days froin the date ofreceipt ofsucb representation, It is also directed that in fhe meanwhiie, fhe tt'ao-sfer ordcr shall be kept in abeyaiice and the petitioner shaU be aUowed to •- contiliue at his present place ofpostmg. Wifh aforesaid directions, tlie petitioa staads fiaaliy disposed of. Sdl- Sunil Kumar Sinha judge vatti