IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2615 of 2000 BAL KRISHNA RAI & ANR Versus TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERS ----------- 18. 06.08.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Opposite parties. The order on the writ petition was to pay the admitted dues to the employees. No quantification of the dues was done by this court while issuing directions. The quantification of the dues is stated to have been done by the University and submitted to the State Government. This quantification is sought to be disputed by the petitioners which cannot be the subject matter of the contempt proceeding. In pursuance of such quantification done by the University, certain payments are stated to have been released to the petitioners. This is also not disputed by the counsel for the petitioners. In so far as the remaining dues of the petitioners as determined by the University is concerned, and which can only be amenable to the contempt proceeding, this Court is satisfied that the contempt application can be disposed in terms of the direction issued by this Court in CWJC No. 2949 of 2007 and analogous cases on 17.7.2008. The directions contained therein shall equally apply to the petitioners in the event that they submit an application of their grievance with regard to the quantification as done by the University and as claimed by the petitioners. The application stands disposed in like terms. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)