IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2011 / 21ST POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 864 of 2011(G) -------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ RAPPAI.K.O, S/O. OUSEPH, KALLARAIKKAL HOUSE, MISSION QUARTERS, MUDOOPALAM, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.JIJO PAUL RESPONDENTS: -------------------- 1. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PALAKKAD - 678 001. 2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, TRIVANDRUM-1. BY SMT.NISHA BOSE, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ---------------------------------- W.P.(C).No. 864 of 2011 --------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of January, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner seeks for a direction to the second respondent to take a decision in terms of Rule 5A Chapter III K.E.R with regard to an application for change of management involving change of ownership of the school. 2. The petitioner and his son got assigned in their favour the management and properties of C.A. High School, Coyalmannam from its former manager as per sale deed No.5247/2009 and 5246/2009 of S.R.O., Alathoor. Thereafter, petitioner submitted an application for getting sanction before the first respondent. The first respondent issued a communication for curing the defects. The defects pointed out were cured by the petitioner as per Ext.P3 submitted before the first respondent. At the time of curing the defects, some more documents have been produced also. The application is now said to be pending before the second respondent. Petitioner has got the file No.EMI 55643/2010 in the office of the second respondent. The petitioner made several reminders in the matter to the W.P.(C).No. 864 of 2011 2 respondents. The true copy of the representation made by the petitioner before the 2nd respondent dated 27.09.2009 is produced as Ext.P4. It is also the case of the petitioner that the legal heirs of the former manager Balan have also represented the matter. 3. There will be a direction to the second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P1 with regard to the change of management of the school in terms of provisions of the Rule 5A of Chapter III K.E.R within a period of six weeks from the date of production of the judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of the Writ Petition along with a certified copy of this judgment to the second respondent for compliance. No costs. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE. ln