IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.7121 of 2008 Date of decision : 16.1.2009 Smt. Nirmal Sharma .....Petitioner Versus General Public and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. Lalit Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner. S. D. ANAND, J. A petition filed by the petitioner in the Court at Chandigarh having been found to be beyond the territorial jurisdiction of that Court, the plaint she filed therein was ordered to be returned to the plaintiff-petitioner for presentation to the learned District Judge, Panchkula. That order was granted in terms of the provisions of Order 7 Rule 10-A of the Code of Civil Procedure. The petitioner did not accept the plaint and insisted upon the return of the documents (which had been filed by her alongwith plaint as well) too. That plea of her was declined by the learned Additional District Judge, Chandigarh, vide impugned order dated 30.4.2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he would be content and interest of justice would be served, if a direction is issued to the learned Additional District Judge, Chandigarh to forward the documents annexed with the plaint to the Court of learned District Judge, Panchkula. The petition is disposed of in limine with a direction to the learned Additional District Judge, Chandigarh to return the plaint to the petitioner and forward the documents annexed therewith to the Court of learned District Judge, Panchkula directly. January 16, 2009 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE