1 rpst30289.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET REVIEW PETITION ST NO.30289 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7001 OF 2010 Radhyeshyam Sodhani and Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. Surbhi Hamir Merchant & Anr. ...Respondents. ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. Mr. R.D. Soni i/by Suraj Kudalkar for the petitioners. Mr.Ajit Kengale for respondent No.2. CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : 16TH DECEMBER, 2010 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the review petitioners and the learned Counsel for original petitioners. The direction contained in clause 2 of order dated 20th September, 2010 passed in the writ petition needs clarification. It is directed that the Application No. 8 of 2003 shall be decided by the 2 rpst30289.10.sxw learned Joint Charity Commissioner in accordance with law, within the time limit provided in the order of this Court. No further clarification is necessary. If the case of review petitioners is that appointment of new trustees cannot be made, it is obvious that this aspect will be considered by the learned Joint Commissioner on merits. Subject to aforesaid clarification, the review petition is rejected. JUDGE