..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1586 OF 2005 Priyanka @ Kalpana Pramod Purohit and 10 Ors. ...Petitioners. Versus Versus Versus Mr.Pramod Gururao Purohit and Anr. ...Respondents. .... Mr.Girish Kulkarni, Adv. for the Petitioners. Mr.J.M.Puranik, Adv. for Respondent No.1. Smt.V.R.Bhosale, APP, for State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 28th February, 2007. DATED : 28th February, 2007. DATED : 28th February, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioners-orig.accused Nos.1 to 6, 8 to 11 & 15, the learned Advocate for respondent No.1-orig.complainant, and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners are seeking quashing of process issued by the learned JMFC, Kalyan in C.C. No.478/2002. 3. For the reasons recorded in the the case of V.K.Jain and others Vs. Pratap V. Padode, V.K.Jain and others Vs. Pratap V. Padode, V.K.Jain and others Vs. Pratap V. Padode, reported in 2005(3) Mh.L.J.778, reported in 2005(3) Mh.L.J.778, reported in 2005(3) Mh.L.J.778, I am of the opinion that the petitioners have an efficacious remedy of preferring revision against the order of Magistrate issuing process. Hence, in my view, it ..(2).. would be appropriate that the petitioners prefer a revision before the concerned Sessions Court against the order of the Magistrate issuing process. 4. Liberty is granted to the petitioners to prefer the necessary revision before the concerned Sessions Court. The learned advocate for the petitioners makes a statement that the necessary revision will be preferred within eight weeks from today. In view of this statement, the trial Court shall not proceed with the trial for a period of eight weeks from today. 5. The learned advocate for respondent No.1-orig.complainant fairly states that no objection will be raised in respect of delay, if any, in filing the revision. 6. On the necessary revision being preferred by the petitioners before the concerned Sessions Court, the concerned Sessions Court after hearing necessary parties shall dispose of the matter on merits. 7. Application is disposed of. ..(3).. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)