IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 9678 of 2008. Decided on 31st December, 2010. _____________________________________________________ Hem Lata. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition, with liberty reserved to file a representation to the second respondent, within a period of three weeks from today. The representation, thereafter shall be decided by respondent No. 2 in accordance with law and in letter and spirit of order dated 6th January, 2007, passed by the Secretary (Education) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh pursuant to the decision of O.A. No. 348 of 2006, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. 2. In view of the above observations, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 31, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 - - 3 - `