IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THIS THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.16829 of 2008 BETWEEN: M. Balraj ..... PETITIONER(S) AND The District Collector, Hyderabad District, Nampally, Hyderabad and others .....RESPONDENT(S) HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.16829 of 2008 ORDER: Since none appeared for the petitioner on 23-03-2010, the writ petition was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, though the writ petition is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, neither is the counsel for petitioner present nor is there any representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. ______________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J. 25th March 2010 CVRK