IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.V.K.BALI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 21ST NOVEMBER 2006 / 30TH KARTHIKA 1928 WA.No. 2112 of 2006() ------------------------ AGAINST JUDGMENT DATED 31.5.2006 IN WPC NO.3471/2006-L APPELLANTS: RESPONDENTS NO.1,2,3 & 5 IN WPC -------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM. 3. ADDITIONAL TAHASILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, VAIKOM. 4. ASST.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD ROAD DIVISION, VAIKOM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.T.B.HOOD RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER, R4 & R6 ------------------------------------------ 1. RAJI, W/O.RAJEEV, KANDATHIL VEETTIL, THALAYOLAPARAMBU, VADAYAR VADAKKUMBHAGOM, VADAYAR VILLAGE, VAIKOM TALUK. 2. THALAYOLAPARAMBU GRAMA PANCHAYAT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. IBRAHIMKUTTY, MURINGAKADAVIL HOUSE, ADIYAM, THALAYOLAPARAMBU, VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/11/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.K. BALI, C.J. & S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------- W.A.No.2112 of 2006 & C.M.Appln. No.1168 of 2006 ------------------------------- Dated, this the 21st day of November, 2006 JUDGMENT V.K.Bali,C.J.(Oral) Delay condoned. 2. After arguing for some time, learned Government Pleader says that this writ appeal be dismissed as withdrawn as the appellants would rather move an application to review the order under challenge by pleading that the land subject matter of dispute does not belong to the Panchayat and it is revenue land. With leave and liberty as asked for, this writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. V.K. BALI, CHIEF JUSTICE. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE. vns