IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 24.08.2010 COCP No.1660 of 2010 Jaswinder Singh and another ...Petitioners Versus Surjit Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. S.K.Sharma, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Anupam Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) The grievance of the petitioners is that the order passed by this Court in the proceedings under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 (for short ‘the Act’) is not given effect by the respondent. The respondent herein filed a petition under Sections 7, 8 and 25 of the Act for appointing himself as legal guardian of minor Asleen Kaur @ Goba @ Mansa. The said petition was allowed by the learned trial Court on 13.06.2009. The said order was set aside by this Court in an appeal on 14.10.2009. The directions in respect of visitation rights etc. granted in favour of the respondent by the learned trial Court were made directions in favour of the present petitioners and against the respondent. The present petitioners were the respondents before the learned trial Court and while dismissing the petition certain directions have been issued in favour of the petitioners by this Court. It is open to the petitioners to take recourse to the remedies as may be available to them, but it cannot be said that mere non-compliance of the directions, give rise to a civil contempt within the meaning of Section 2 (c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Dismissed. 24.08.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE