IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.3088 of 2004 ==================================================== Moli Kumari, D/o- Sri S.N. Pandey, resident of Hanidpur, Patna, District- Patna. ……………………………….. Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna 3. The Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Human Resources (Secondary Education) Development Department, Government Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna 4. The Director, Secondary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Budh Marg, Patna. 5. State of Jharkhand through its Chief Secretary, Government Secretariat at Ranchi, P.O.+ District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 6. The Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Education Department, Ranchi, State- Jharkhand ………………………….. Respondents ==================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner: Mr. Shyama Kant Singh, Advocate, Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate & Mr. Rakesh Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Respondent: Mr. Pushkar Narayan Shahi, A.A.G. 14 & Mr. Sanjeet Kumar Singh, A.C. to A.A.G. 14 ==================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN 2 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 13.01.2011 Learned advocates submit that several writ petitions involving same dispute were decided by a common judgment of the writ court and the appeals arising out of some of the writ petitions have been disposed of. We are in agreement that judgment and order dated 6- 4-2010 passed in LPA No. 1492/2009 (The State of Bihar Vs Dinesh Thakur) is applicable in the present writ petition also. In that view of the matter, this petition is finally disposed of in terms of the aforesaid judgment with same orders and directions. Patna High Court/ Dated the 13th January 2011/ Bibhash/N.A.F.R. ( R.M. Doshit, CJ.) (Jyoti Saran, J.)