1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4699 OF 2009 Indira Gandhi Bahuuddeshiya Pratishthan, Camp-Kaularu, Sarjepura, Ahmednagar, Through, its President, Shri.Nilesh S/o.Ramesh Dhasal, Age-32 years, Occu-Social Work, & President of Indira Gandhi Prathishthan, R/o.Camp-Kaularu, Sarjepura, Ahmednagar PETITIONER VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through Secretary, Triable Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32. 2. The Commissioner, Triable Development Corporation, ‘Adiwasi Vikas Bhawan’ Beside Income Tax Office, Agra Road, Nashik. Dist. Nashik. 3. The District Collector, Ahmednagar, Dist. Ahmednagar RESPONDENTS Mr.D.B.Pawar, learned counsel for petitioner Mr.V.H.Dighe, learned AGP for respondents. 2 (CORAM : P.V.HARDAS AND A.V.POTDAR, J.J.) DATE : 21/07/2009 ORAL JUDGMENT : (Per P.V.Hardas, J.) 1. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission. 2. We have heard Shri.Pawar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri.Dighe, learned AGP, who accepts notice on behalf of respondent no.1 to 3. 3. The grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that the respondent no.2 has not forwarded the proposal of the petitioner to respondent no.1 for consideration though the petitioner had submitted the proposal within the time, which was specified by the circular dated 15/05/2009 calling for proposals up to 30/05/2009. The petitioner has also annexed a copy of the acknowledgment in respect of the receipt of the proposal. Prima facie we are satisfied that the petitioner had indeed submitted the proposal within the time which was specified in the said circular. However, for reasons which are not discernible, the respondent no.2 has not forwarded the proposal to the respondent no.1. 4. We therefore allow this petition and direct respondent no.2 to 3 forward the proposal of the petitioner, if the same has been submitted by petitioner within the time specified and if the proposal is complete in all respects. This be done by respondent no.2 within 2 weeks from today. On receipt of the said proposal by respondent no.1 from respondent no.2, the same may be decided as expeditiously as possible. 5. Rule is thus made absolute on the terms indicated above with no order as to costs. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) (P.V.HARDAS, J.) khs/JULY 2009/wp4699-09