IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.597 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision 31.01.2011 Pala ...... Petitioner VERSUS Raj Kumar @ Ram Kumar and another ...... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Bahadur Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J: The petitioner-plaintiff, having lost in both the Courts below, to seek ad-interim injunction, restraining the defendants from interfering in the suit land, has come to this Court in revision. The petitioner claims to be in possession of four kanals out of 73 kanals 18 marlas of land which consists of two parcels i.e. 50 kanals 13 marlas and 23 kanals 5 marlas. As per jamabandi for the year 2004-2005, both the petitioner as well as respondents are recorded as co-sharers in joint possession of the entire land and the petitioner is not shown in exclusive possession of the suit land. Thus, the petitioner cannot be said to have a prima facie case in his favour. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 31.01.2011 mamta-II