1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 900 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 900 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 900 OF 2008 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 573 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 573 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 573 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax-14, Mumbai. .. Appellant. vs. Smt. Damayant K. Dalal. .. Respondent. Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for Appellant. Ms. Aasifa Khan for Respondent. CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & SANTOSH BORA, JJ. SANTOSH BORA, JJ. SANTOSH BORA, JJ. DATE: 17TH APRIL, 2008. DATE: 17TH APRIL, 2008. DATE: 17TH APRIL, 2008. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the parties. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 499 days delay caused in filing the Appeal. 2. Perused the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion. The appeal has been filed challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai 2 dated 18.5.2006. The appeal does not even mention when and on what date the approval was granted to file the appeal. 3. We are not satisfied with the reasons given for delay that the matter has to be examined at various levels of the Income-tax department. No sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Hence, Notice of Motion stands dismissed. 4. In view of the dismissal of the notice of motion, the appeal also stands dismissed. (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (SANTOSH BORA, J.) (SANTOSH BORA, J.) (SANTOSH BORA, J.)