IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) CR.M.P.No. ^^~ of 2010 APPLICANT/ Non-applicant ^ £> _.,.'"\^- .^<s^r / '\':"I-"" .^•"^^.••" ^-^' <^-:;.s%^' ^ Ram Kripal, aged about 35 years S/o Chatrapati, Caste Kumhar, R/o Village Kalyanpur, Post Devnagar, P.S. & Tahsil Surajpur & Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) <<<^T ..••" l^i'"' RESPONDENTS Applicants VERSUS :1 Moharmania Bai D/o Late-Roopsai caste Panika, aged about 33 years, 2. Minor Munna S/o Not Known, through guardian mother Mohermania, Both R/o Village Kalyanpur, P.S. & Tahsil Surajpur, Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 482TOF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ^;jSSa535^ ^;-^ (h ''•'; /y^ ~\ an^f ^ R-li* ?<n -STT^T ^iHi^i @ '3~sr "4i'4i<n'4, ^•(TI'M'IS, r««ii'H*i< i- IAB ffwvn ^wcti i te_ •^200 sf^v •^SR (i^Fj«(i^T) wnw^feon^i Sg :i-joji_BieSnTj Manindjg Fnulhgn Siirli/astavg, »i 01-10-2010 onn u.N.r-Tajapaii, counse neara on aamission This petitiori under Sectioj ag.grleved by order dated 21/07/3 Sessions Judge, Surajpur arisl^ judicial iViagistrate 1" Class, 160A34. Assailing the coiTectness No. 160/04. anu me oraer passea in revisioi tnai witnoui tnere oeing <i cogeni] reaara 10 tne parenLaye or lesiiniony OT responueni iio.'i.i rnainienancs nas ueen avy'araeq sr.Ques that In oroef' to urove th nave iea speciiic eviaence or eiif] rnonoyomic reiations with the wfui SH'v oinef yorsons. in order to corne tu the co uorn oui or ine pnysicai reiauc] E62iTieQ ivi3Qisirsie nas i'eiieQ iviohanriania Bai iappiicants wl iNio.zj, busnfia iappiicanrs "vviin^ applicant witness No.3), the consiaeraiion ine cenfricaie or DI| ct)l<<ici«i1iiTP^ff ^ ^vc^ <^Ff'(-$i< ^raifinsn^r i ror ine oeuiioner. i '40^ ^r.r.v^. na^ ceen liieu oy u'i^ peouoiiei :010 (Annexure A/1) passed by 1°- Ada'itjonai ig out of oruer dated 19/03/08 passsd by yuraipur jn iviiscejlaneous cnminal Uase ^nd vaiidity of order of award of rnaintenance [i, learned counsel fur the petitioner afgues sna uriirfipeacnaDie evioency on rscorQ 'wiin r^Dondent No.2.onlv on the bssis of ora! siaiincj ner reiaiions wiin ine peuuoner. Learnea counsei Tur ine peii'Boner runner e pareniaye, me responaeni i'liu.i ougni10 ler marnaue onnaiine responaeni jfO.'i naa SppUCSHI SHQ IHSl Sne n^Q no sucn reiasions iciusion of fact that the respondent No.2 was ns of the petjtioner 'with resoondent No.1. uuon ine lesiimoriv resDondent No.1 iness iio.it, iMarayan ^appiicanis wiiness •ss iio.^) as aiso lesiimonv or u&iQii (non- iearneu 'wasisirate nas aiso laKen inio tn pisceu Defore ttiS coun. % 1: ! XI-HC—78 W*I?(T SbHleb 's^ -^wwi, otily'is, fs«yii'Mli,< ,\A.a.,'^^-/^ an^r '<^VK ('yf-i'i'^r) 311^1 v\ Fe.-\i* Wi SD^T shMI* TRTIW^rtCT 311^1 9- in ine opiriion or inis t/oun 1 ao noi Tina anv rneni uisrnissed. ctiT^fc+q^ *TT*1C?i' ^f t^l<it <Pq*^l< ^aiRpran^r , cne conciuston uTavi/n DV me iViagisirate in summary proceedings under S^ction 125 Cr.P.C. cannot be said tu be peiverse or iiiegal so as to warratit any interi'erence by this Court in exercise uf its inhereht power undet" Secticjn 482 Cr.P.C. jn ifiiS peiiliOn. ! ne DeyuOH ES inereTore Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge