1 cp-227.10 Ash FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.227 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri N.V. Bandiwadekar for the Petitioner. Shri A.I. Patel, AGP for the State. ­­ CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 29TH NOVEMBER, 2010 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. He submits that the communication dated 11th March, 2010 issued by the Education Officer (Secondary) does not amount to compliance of the order passed by this Court which directs the 1st and the 2nd Respondents to decide the representation. 2. Careful scrutiny of the communication dated 11th March, 2010 issued by the 2nd Respondent shows that he has communicated the decision of the 1st Respondent to the Petitioner. Thus, there appears to be a substantial compliance of the order passed by this Court. Hence, no case is made out for initiating action under the Contempt 2 cp-227.10 of Courts Act, 1971. If the Petitioner is aggrieved by the decision taken, remedy of the Petitioner always remains open. (A.S.OKA, J)