BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty First day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.N.BASHA CRL OP(MD) Nos.16985 & 16987 of 2011 1. AYSAL BEEVI 2. UMMU SUBAITHAL : PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Nos.5&6 IN CRL OP(MD) No.16985/11 3. JAINULABUDIN : PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.8 IN CRL OP(MD) No.16987/11 Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. IN CR.NO.38 OF 2007 : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. M.KARL MARX Advocate in both petitions For Respondent : Mr. T.MOHAN Additional Public Prosecutor in both petitions PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- COMMON ORDER The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 465, 467, 468, 420, 471 and 109 I.P.C. in Crime No.38 of 2007 on the file of the respondent police and seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been arrayed as A5, A6 and A8 and they have been implicated on the allegation of attesting the alleged forged document said to have been fabricated by the other co-accused. It is submitted that they have been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the co-accused have already been granted the relief of anticipatory bail by the Principal Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli in Cr.M.P.No.4629 of 2011 dated 30.11.2011. 3. Mr.T.Mohan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that he is not having any instruction. 4. It is seen that the petitioners have been implicated on the allegation that the petitioners attested the alleged forged document said to have been fabricated by the other co-accused. It is pertinent https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ to note that the other co-accused have already been granted the relief of anticipatory bail by the Principal Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli in Cr.M.P.No.4629 of 2011 dated 30.11.2011. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said learned Judicial Magistrate or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioners 1 and 2/A5 and A6 in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.16985/2011 being ladies, they shall be available for interrogation as and when required and the petitioner/A8 in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.16987 of 2011 shall report before the respondent police daily at 5.30 p.m. for a period of four weeks and thereafter, he shall be available for interrogation as and when required. sd/- 21/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.1 TIRUNELVELI. 2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DCB, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. +2 CCs to M/S. M.KARL MARX Advocate SR.Nos.45800 & 45801 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) Nos.16985 & 16987 of 2011 Date :21/12/2011 NSV/26.12.11/2P/7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/