(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. Writ Petition No. 4342 of 2009 Siddharth s/o. Arjun Sonawane, Age : 35 years, Occupation : Up-Sarpanch, Malegaon, R/o. Malegaon, Taluka : Badanapur, Dist. Jalna. .. Petitioner. versus 1. Shrimant s/o. Chendiram Shelke, Age : Major, Occupation : Business, (Fair Price shop licence Holder), R/o. Malegaon, Tal. : Badanapur, District : Jalna. 2. The Tahasildar, Badanapur, Taluka : Badanapur, District : Jalna. 3. The District Supply Officer, Jalna, Taluka & District : Jalna. 4. The Deputy Commissioner (Supply), Aurangabad, Dist. Aurangabad. .. Respondents. .................. Mr. Amol S. Gandhi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.M. Shinde, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos.2, 3 and 4. .................. (2) CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 10TH JULY 2009. COURT’S ORDER : 1. By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 9th March 2009, passed by the respondent no.4 i.e. Deputy Commissioner (Supply), Aurangabad, in Revision No. 2008/SB/R.P.-339, thereby setting aside the order dated 10th October 2008 and remanding the matter to the respondent no.3. 2. Perusal of the impugned order would reveal that the matter is remanded for conducting the proceedings afresh. Since the matter only challenges order of remand, I am not inclined to entertain the petition in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 3. Petition is, therefore, dismissed. 4. However, in the facts of the case, the respondent no.3 is directed to conclude the proceedings, after remand, within a period of three months from today. ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE ...................... bgp/wp4342