(^ /^^^ f 9(6^ JO^ O/^ °>0!3>^^4Q BEFO.rSE TI-IB MM)'HTA PKAD2SH SYATE ADMINISTEATIVE ^imJNM_P^^IPAL~^El^H AT-J:JB^ G^ No'^)0'-25~1 /l 994 APPLICANT?<»«.. ^Deo Kumar Choabey S/o Ram Dharl Choabey Aged aboat '37 years 'Daily Wage Norker Range Off.ice Oagdalpur - Central "Bastar Territorial Division_ Jagdalpur HQ Jagdalpar (Distt Bastar) Mp R/6 AmagucSa., Near Govt Water pump Lal Bagh JAGDALPUR (MP) 494 001 Versus R£.SPONDENTSs<l State of Madhya Pradesh Through Secretary Porest Department Vallabh Bhawan Bhopal. (MP) Conservator of Forests Jagdalpur Circle Jagdalpur (MP) Ibtett Bastar) MP Divisional Forest Officer . . - 'Central Bastar (Territorial) Division Jagdalpur (Distt Bastar) Mp •• I&17AJ1S_..C& •1HE J^PI^inAQlTTlKL*_.-——- 'r / u- HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURB CHHATTISGARHs Be^eh; Hosi^Me K. Jo W, P,S._No. 1002.of 2005 Petitioner Respondents Versus Deo Kuina^r Chonbey State of Madhya Pi'a.clesli & Others Shri Abhay Tiwajri, counsel for ttie petitioner, Shri Ajay Dwivecli, Pejiiel Lawyer for the State. (10th Juty, 2006] The preseut petitioii fUed by the petitioner, who was appoiiited as Dally Wages IVorkcr on the post of Godown Keeper ia Kondagoaji Plaiitatiou Division^ Central Bastar Division, on 26.8.1980. Lesjaied cou-nsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioiier is stffl workiag as DaJly Wages Worker aad tliere is vacmicy available for regiilaiization. In view of the latest dictum laid dowu by flie Suprenie Court iu the case of of Vs. (3| this C-ourt caiinot direct regulari^ation ofv the petitioner on aiiy groiind even ou the grouud that the petitioner beeii workiiig for more than last 26 years, In the Ught of pai'a 53 io. case of of ¥s. (3| the State Goveniinent is directed to taJ^e steps for regule-rization as a oiie-tmie nieasiire. The Supreme Court ui para 53 of tlie Judgenient in fhe case of of Vs. (3| obser^ed thus: "53, One aspect needs to be clarified, There niay be cases ¥7here irregular apporiitnieiits (not Ulegal appoio.tm.eiits) as explaiiied iii S.V, Narayaiiappa11, R.N. Naiijundappa12 aiid B.N. Nagai'ajaii8 .aiid referred to iii para 15 above, of duly qzialified persoiis iii duly saiictione.d vacasit posts might have been made ajid the employees have contmued to work for ten years or inore but without the iiiteryention of orders of the courts or of tdbunals. The question of regiilari^ation of fhe services of such em.ployees may have to be considere.d on me.rits in the light of the prmciples settled by this Coiut ia tiie cases abovereferred to and ui the Ught of fh.is judgnieut, In that context, the Union of India, the State Goveninieiits aiid tlieii' iiistnimentalities slioiild take steps to regiilarize as a one-ttme measure, fhe services of such UTegnlmly appoiiited, who have worked for ten yem's or niore in diily saactioiied posts but not iiiider cover of orders of tiie courts or of tiibunais aiid should further eiisure tliat regnlar recruitnieiits are undertaken to fill tbose vacant sanctioiied posts fliat require to be filled up, in cases where temporaiy employees or daily wagers are beuig iiow employed. The process 2nust be set in motiou withia six months from tliis date, We also clarify tliat regrilarization, if aiiy already made, but not sub judice, ne.ed uot be reopene.d based cn this judgmeut, but there should be no fartJier bypassiiig of the constitiitional 'l^ S^fSW~"-"£ 4. requirement aiid regularising or ma-kiag pei'man.ent, fliose not diUy apponited as per fhe constitutioiisl scheme/' In view of fhe afore-mentioned reasons, the petition staaids disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^!T\