IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10946 of 2008 ARUN SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 16.05.2008 Heard both sides. The petitioner is the husband. He has approached this Court for grant of anticipatory bail in a case instituted under sections 498A and 406 of I.P.C and sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the marriage in the present case had taken place in the year 1996. It has further been submitted that owing to the behaviour of the complainant, this petitioner had filed a complaint that the girl with the help of her Naihar people had left the matrimonial him with her belongings. It appears that in the said case, cognizance had also been taken. Counsel for the petitioner, referring to the order passed on the anticipatory bail application of some accuseds, submits that the indecent behaviour of the complainant was also observed by the Court below in paragraph nos. 7, 8 and 9 of the order which is quoted herein below:- “The notice was issued to the complainant During hearing of the bail petition, she has appeared physically in Court. The husband is ready to take his wife along with minor children after executing necessary bond. But the gird did not agree to go with her husband. On the other hand, her behaviour in the Court was not proper and she did not give reply to the question put by the Court in sober - 2 - manner and she also started misbehaving with lawyers, who were arguing the case on behalf of the petitioners.” In the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks, petitioner Arun Sharma will be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Saharsa in connection with Complaint Case no. 364(C)/2006. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J )