^^^T®0 IN THE ^IW COURT OF CHHAms^ARH AT BILASPUR WRIT P^TITION (S) N0. (o<S^>2^0F 2010 PETITIONERS : 1. Satish kumar, S/o. Shri Dauram Dwivedi. aged about 43 years Occupation - Working as Daily Wages employee, Nagar, Panchayat Berla, Distt. Durg (C.6.) .^ CPJ / P/c./ ^s^ A;>^7 .^••kr^^y <b-"'£?</v/ €y^fy ^yT ^/v 7-, 6. R6SPONDENTS : ^hasiram Lasel, S/o. Shri Budhram lasel, aged about 32 years, Occupation - Working as Dai(y Wages employee, Nagar, Panchayat Berla, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Rajaram , S/o. Shri Chamru Bhoi, aged about 41 years Occupation - Working as Daily Wages employee, Nagar, Panchayat BerJa, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Tarkeshwar Singh Chouhan S/o. Shri Bharat Singh aged about 37 years Occupation - Working as t>aily Wages employee, Nagar, Ponchayat Berla, Distt. C>urg (C.6.) Netram, S/o. Shri Narayan, aged about 40 years Occupation - Working as Daily Wages employee, Nagar, Panchayat Berla, Distt. Durg (C.G.) PremprakQsh S/o. Shri Bhagwat Singh aged about 38 years Occupation - Workfn9 QS Daity Wages employee, Na9ar, Panchayat Berla, Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS , 1. The State jof Chhattisgarh, Through ^The Principal Secretapy, bjepartment qf Urban Administration and Development, Mantralaya at b.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (<;&). i ,2. The Under Secretary, Department of Urban Administration and Development, Mantrataya at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C&). ^ 3. Nagar. Panchayat Berfa, Distt. Durg (C.G.). Through »ts Chief Municipal Officer, Berla,District Durg (C.G.) ^ 4. The Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat Beria, Dist. Durg (C.6.) WRIT PETETION UNbER ARTCCLE 226 OF THE CONSTCTUTION OF INDIA ^u HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 6832 of 2010 PETITIONERS : Satish Kumar & Others VERSUS RESPONDENTS : The State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihotri. J. Present: Shri Shashank Thakur, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Sushil Dubey, Government Advocate for the State. Shri Harsh Wardhan,Advocate for the respondent No.3 & 4. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on 21st day ofApril, 2011) 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the parties fairly submit that the issue with regard to applicability of circulars dated 23/09/2010 and 05/03/2008 was considered in Virendra Das Manikpuh & Others v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others1. This Court, after hearing all the parties, considered the issue and passed the order in Virendra Das Manikpuri & Others . This petition may be disposed of accordingly. 2. Thus, having regarding to the facts situation of the case, wherein the issue involved in Virendra Das Manikpuri & Others as well as in this case are one and the same, the instant petition stands disposed of in the same terms and order passed in Virendra Das Manikpuri & Others1. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge Arun 1 W.P.(S) No. 7450 of 2010, decided on 10.02.2011