1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 506/2010 Sau. Vrushali Kiran Satpute ..versus.. Kiran Vinayak Satpute =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-== Shri J.M.Gandhi, Advocate for respondent. C ORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 28th JUNE, 2010. Heard. 2) Counsel for the petitioner absent. Counsel for respondent seeks time to file reply. He also informs, the matter is likely to be settled between the spouse. 3) The allegations of nullity of the marriage or restitution of conjugal rights need not be commented upon. The wife resides in the jurisdiction of Amravati Court, while the husband has filed matrimonial proceedings at Sangli. The wife has also initiated the proceedings at Amravti. 4) Considering the difficulties that the wife contemplate in the long drawn travel from her native place to Sangli, the feasibility warrants that both the petitions to be taken up together and the request for 2 transfer of the case from the learned C.J.S.D. Sangli to the learned Family Court at Amravati, cannot be said to be a ruse to squeeze from other grounds between the parties. 5) The application is accordingly allowed and disposed of. No costs. (K.U.Chandiwal) JUDGE. Rvjalit