THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI C.R.P.No. 2780 of 2010 ORAL ORDER: The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the orders of the learned I Addl. Rent Controller, Hyderabad in I.A.Nos. 231 and 202 of 2010 in R.C.No. 43 of 2007, dated 4.6.2010. Brief facts of the revision are that: Petitioners herein are the petitioners-respondents in I.A.Nos.231 and 202 of 2010 in R.C.No. 43 of 2007 before the learned Rent Controller, Hyderabad. Respondent herein is the respondent-petitioner before the learned Rent Controller. For the purpose of convenience, the parties as arrayed before the learned Rent Controller are referred to hereinafter in this order. Petitioners have filed I.A.Nos. 231 and 202 of 2010 to recall the P.Ws.No. 1 and 2 for further cross examination. After hearing both the parties, the learned Rent Controller has dismissed the said I.As. Challenging the said order of dismissal, the present Civil Revision Petition has been preferred. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. Perused the order under revision. The order discloses that the matter is posted for further evidence. At that stage the petitioners have preferred the present application to recall the P.Ws. No.1 and 2 for further cross-examination. When the said witnesses were already cross examined at length, recalling P.Ws. No.1 and 2 for further cross examination is not at all required. One way or other, the petitioners are trying to drag on the matter with delay tactics. From the foregoing discussions, I do not find any merit in the contention of the petitioners to recall the P.Ws.1 and 2 for further cross examination. Accordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed. _______________________ T. MEENA KUMARI, J 6.7.2010 CHV