@ .7 ww i " z i I g.) )m._szcnO/m7j Em E it e ' I m ‘ ’ u 2 Fi200 m \ av ma’nm WWW filé above, recovexiy‘, th6 pensi m case 0f the peiitioner has not Deal fm‘aljmd. He further submits: ‘1 without issuing any Show c: Lu56 11otiC€ and without anommg an 013p01tunity‘ of 11€ari11g anti same agamst H16 mummies against the ploposgu 1ecovmw espondents Even amt mom iuc'igment in the matter Ch‘nat'tisggh anti others! 1t orciared for a11€gsa excws payl :5. The respondents even 2 faii‘ee‘t to file reiuniand thus tl‘ e facts mentioned in the petiiion stand unrebut'iea. us piacmg lenance me principies of iaW iaid down in the 4. i the instant neu‘tion is ahowed and The matter of Vidya&i1ar (Sunra), impugned Older dated zz AM? of Annexure P—l direcnng recovery of amount of Rs. 37,594/— 1s 32mm“) Mt‘n 1; ewes, wk 11/2008 1,00,000. WWWWW {73/95 \ ifllout assigning any mason Ior the. natural justicn The reprnsantatmn nave also not been consmerea m the ' 1an 152 year . Hacmg renance on the Staie of as contenéied that no recovery can be lent from the pension of the peunoner. ft'er affori‘iing two onporr'unitiee, have V mu:aanar Tiwari —v- heyeb‘y' quashed. The responaents are. directed to flnahze the pension case of the petitioner forthwim. Sd/~ Dhirendra Mishra ~ _A Judge hat order of recovery has heen passed “ f