THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI C.R.P.NO. 4885 of 2006 ORAL ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the orders of the learned Judge, Family Court, Secunderabad in I.A.No. 211 of 2005 in O.P.No. 309 of 2004, dated 12.9.2005. Brief facts of the revision are that: The petitioner herein is the petitioner, who filed O.P.No. 309 of 2004 before the lower Court against the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 for grant of divorce. Before the learned trial court, the petitioner has filed the present petition seeking to add 3rd respondent therein as proposed party to the O.P. After hearing the parties, the learned trial Court has dismissed the said petition. Challenging the said order of the learned trial Court, the present revision petition has been preferred by the defeated petitioner. Heard both sides. Perused the order under revision and also the entire record placed before this Court. As can be seen from the order under revision that initially the petitioner-husband filed the O.P. against the wife-1st respondent for divorce. While the O.P. is pending, the petitioner-husband has moved the present application to implead the 3rd respondent-proposed party as party respondent to the O.P. pending before the learned trial Court. After hearing the parties, the learned Court has dismissed the application of the petitioner. The learned trial Court has observed thus: “More so, according to respondent No.1, the proposed party along with family used to come to the house of respondent No.1 to have dinners when they lived together. Except bald allegations, there is no direct proof of adultery or any circumstances thereto in support of his inference. Merely because of moving together in the presence of petitioner as a family friend, the unhealthy allegation is leveled against the 1st respondent as well as the proposed party. Thus, the petitioner now cannot pray the court to implead all the persons against whom-so-ever he got doubt” In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and also in view of the categorical finding of the lower Court, I do not find any merits in the civil revision petition and the same is not maintainable and the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. However, the lower Court shall dispose of the suit within a period of six months from the date of the receipt of the copy of this order if not already disposed of without being influenced by any of the observations made in this order. _______________________ T. MEENA KUMARI, J 10.2.2009 CHV