"/ \ ’A,_,, ‘—q< - FAGE N0 u-ulwt'“ Q\ CHHATTI SGABH AT BIIASPUR . 2W /1 wan pETITION N0. i 2oo. F /a t ramed Kumar Jha s. Late Kedamah Jha; age 48 years “Compaunder "; :, R/O Mathilpara Jain Mandir Road, Bur Tahsil & Disrict Dugg (C.G.) E R agr" : . President Committee Health Corporation, & Hospitl Nagar Palik Du (CGo3- Durg Tahsil and Distt. RESPONDENTS M a Com‘missianer; Municipal CorpGration " NAGAR NIGAM Burg; Tahsi and Distt. Burg. (c.G.). VDY ha Ayu os r g; Avadé‘am Pandey “ AARAJ " S/o.” not known ; Desbndhu rvedi Hpital, Municipal Coparation ’ NAGAR NIGAM' ,Dur Tahsil 8. Dist‘t. Burg (C.G.) 8. Ku. Chhama Shanna /. Bhvi Lal Shanna " ompounde ". Ayurvedi Hosptal Municipl Corporaon GAR IGAM Burg Tahsil & Distt Durg (6.6.) " u iN THE HGNwRABLE HIGH GwRT 9F JUDICATURE Em FETITIOW . \ g, t V S U S rg - " l Do anar Cr c i a ti " NA N " . . / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226(227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. XI-HC—78 m 29g WWW?) WWW ‘W mm muss (was) mw%am w— 2~ WW§wm $aimam‘r 8 Annexure P/ 1 the petitioner Auéhdhalaya to Deshbandhu €04 KuA Chama Sharma was Aushdhalaya to Tigurdeeh tion of Municipai Cogcration, allenged this order in a civil by her was also dismissed. As e civil suit and appeal ration, Durg passed an order 1) calling upon Respondent rs as to Why she is not rder. The matter is pending of 24 hours calling upon to ort Learned counsel f01 the t WChama Sharma 1s a Widow and deserves sympathe 1c cons1deration. Be that as 1t poration to consider all the Vide ordar dated 1 1.6. 199 was transferred from Titurdeeh Aushdhalaya and Respondent 1 traimferred from Kasarideeh i Aushdhalaya Within the jurisdiq Burg. The Respondent No.4 CI g suit and thereafter appeal filed ,a ‘result of dismissal of Conlmiésioner Municipal Corp dt 4th April 2002 (Annexure N04 to explain Within 24 §Comp1ying with the transfer since long, but in any case p submit explanation was very Respondent No 4 submits th may, it is for the responden aspects and decide the same. Having thus considered 1e facts and circumstances of the case it is directed that the respondent—Corporation or its Commissioner would odonnsider all the aspects of the matter and decide the same; n accord ce with law after hearing the petitioner and the Responde t No.4.; as. early as possible ' d e t 1 / u r f V XLHc—78 33mm, m, W Wm .W 2G0 mm (ma) mg: W m’w 3m! '—- g# WW%$W§m Within a period of one month from the date of production of certifled copy of this order along with representation which may be made by petitioner and Respondent No.4‘ With the above observation this petition is disposed of at this stage a; _ Parties are entitled for certified copy M Sd/— y Fakhruddin Judge