Crl. Misc. No. M-3152 of 2010 Hardip Singh @ Geja and Others v. State of Punjab Present : Mr. Rahul Rampal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Shilesh Gupta, DAG, Punjab. Mr. KDS Sodhi, Advocate for the complainant. *** Heard counsel for the petitioners. Except for the injury on the right fore-arm of the complainant Bahadur Singh, the other injuries received by him are simple in nature. The grievous injury is not attributed to any of the petitioners. Even otherwise, the injury on the left fore-arm is not on the vital part of the person of the complainant (injured). The offence under Section 326 IPC has been added later on. In respect of the incident that occurred on 16.12.2009, the FIR has been registered after nine days on 25.12.2009. Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Jatinder Singh, Police Station Sadar Phagwara submits that the petitioners have joined the investigation and their custody is not required for the purposes of investigation. Learned counsel for the complainant has opposed the application inter alia contending that the petitioners had way laid the complainant and caused injuries on his head. However, it is not disputed that the injuries on the head are simple in nature. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the interim bail granted on 3.2.2010 is made absolute. Crl. Misc. petition stands disposed of. (S.S. SARON) JUDGE May 20, 2010 amit