IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM THURSDAY, THE 1ST SEPTEMBER 2011 / 10TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 13842 of 2011(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.V. MADHAVA WARRIER, MANAGING TRUSTEE, IVER MADOM SREEKRISHNA TEMPLE,PAMBADI, THIRUVILWAMALA, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.T.KRISHNAN UNNI, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.P.BHASKARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PAZHAYANNUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. SURESH ALIAS KAASU, S/O. AYYAPPAN, KUNDUKADU COLONY, MALESAMANGALAM, THIRUVILWAMALA, THRISSUR. 3. UNNIKRISHNAN, SON OF RAMANKUTTY, KUNNATHATTU COLONY, PAMBADI, THIRUVILWAMALA, THRISSUR. 4. CHANDRAN, SON OF KANNAN, KUNNATHATTUADI, PAMBADI, THIRUVILWAMALA, THRISSUR. 5. RAMACHANDRAN, SON OF KUNCHAI, KUNNATHATTUADI, PAMBADI, THIRUVILWAMALA, THRISSUR. 6. KUMARAN, SON OF KUNCHAI, KUNNATHATTUADI, PAMBADI, THIRUVILWAMALA, THRISSUR DIST. 7. MANIKANTAN, SON OF KANDAN, KUNNATHATTUADI, PAMBADI, THIRUVILWAMALA, THRISSUR. 8. VIJAYAN, CHEMBAMKOTTIL HOUSE, BINDUNIVAS, PAMBADI, THIRUVILWAMALA, THRISSUR. WP(C).13842/2011 ..2.. 9. RAJAN, KANJULLY HOUSE, THIRUVILWAMALA, THRISSUR DIST. 10. PRASAD WARRIER, MALAVATTATHU MADOM, PAMBADI,THIRUVILWAMALA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. Addl.R11. K.JYOTHISH,S/O. S.P.GANGADHARAN NAIR, RESIDING AT KOTTUKULANGARA GEETHA NIVAS, MANNUR POST, PALAKKAD. PIN – 678006. ADDL.R11 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DT. 31.5.2011 IN I.A.8137/2011 THE NAME OF THE 9TH RESPONDENT IS DELETED FROM THE PARTY ARRAY AS PER ORDER DATED 7.6.11 IN WP(C). ADV. SRI.V.C.MADHAVANKUTTY FOR R10 SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN FOR ADDL.R11 SRI.K.RAMACHANDRAN FOR R2,5,7,8 SMT.S.JAYASREE FOR R2,5,7,8 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM,JJ. ------------------------------- WP(C).NO. 13842 of 2011 --------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose ,J. In this writ petition the petitioner is seeking adequate police protection to the life and liberty and religious freedom to the petitioner and seeking direction to the 1st respondent to take necessary action against respondents 2 to 10. Though the writ petition stood posted on various dates, every time the case got adjourned by either of the parties. Today a request is made by both sides that the matter be posted after vacation. We close this writ petition. It is open to either parties to apply for revival as and when necessary. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM,JUDGE pmn/ WP(C) 2