IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 11698 of 2011 Date of Decision: July 08, 2011 Ram Bakash and others. . ….Petitioners Versus The State of Haryana and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Ashok Verma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that vide impugned order dated 31.03.2010, Superintending Canal Officer, Bhakra Water Services Circle-1, Hisar, as well as, Superintending Canal Officer, Yamuna Water Services Circle, Bhiwani, have recommended to the Government for sanction of Badala Minor. Learned counsel further states that recommendation has not been accepted so far. He further states that petitioners shall submit the representation within CWP No.11698 of 2011 30 days from today before the Government pointing out that recommendation of Superintending Canal Officer is not in the interest of public at large and existing canal is meeting out need of the irrigation water of all the villagers. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this petition with the aforesaid liberty. Present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, petitioners shall be at liberty to move representation before the Government stating the grounds as to why recommendation made by Superintending Canal Officer be not accepted within 30 days from today. Government while taking decision on the recommendation, as well as, on the representation which is to be moved by the petitioners, shall be at liberty to hear all the interested parties. July 08, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2