IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.290 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5210 OF 2005 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:----------------------------------- Mr.R.S.Apte with Mr.M.S.Lagu for the appellant. None for the respondents. CORAM: SMT.RANJANA DESAI & CORAM: SMT.RANJANA DESAI & CORAM: SMT.RANJANA DESAI & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. DATED: 12TH JANUARY, 2006 DATED: 12TH JANUARY, 2006 DATED: 12TH JANUARY, 2006. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The basic grievance of the appellant is about mutation entry. The learned single Judge has rightly held that entry in the revenue records is merely presumption as to possession and it is always open to the title holder to claim a higher claim to get a declaration in which event the judgment of the Civil Court would displace the entries in the revenue records. This obviously is well settled principle of law which we have no hesitation to reaffirm. In our opinion, no case is made out for admission of the appeal. The letters patent appeal is dismissed. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (Smt.Ranjana Desai,J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (Smt.Ranjana Desai,J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (Smt.Ranjana Desai,J.)