CRP 171/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.P.KATAKEY Heard Mr IH Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff and Mr N Choudhury, learned counsel for the respondent/defendant. The petitioner, by the present petition, has challenged the order dated 18th March 2010 passed by the learned appellate Court in Misc Appeal No.4/2008 w hereby and whereunder the appeal preferred by the present petitioner has been di smissed by upholding the order dated 6th June 2008 passed by learned trial Court refusing to pass any order of injunction. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cross-examination of the defendant’s witness is over during pendency of this revision petition and t he suit is at the argument stage. Learned counsel for the respondent could not c onfirm the same but submits that, according to his instruction, the suit was ear lier fixed for cross-examination of the defendant’s witness. Be that as it may, since the order of status-quo passed by this Court on 21st May 2010 is continuing till date and the suit is on the verge of completio n of hearing, I dispose of this petition by directing the parties to maintain st atus-quo as on today with regard to the possession of the suit property. It is n eedless to say that the respondent is allowed to make necessary repair of the ex isting house without, however, making any permanent construction. It would be op en to the respondent to apply for and get the electricity connection to the suit premises, if provided by the electric supply company. The learned Court below shall also make an endeavour to decide the suit as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from to day. The revision petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.