IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1146 of 2010 FULIYA DEVI WIFE OF LATE BRAHMDEO MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.1.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that there is no allegation of demand of dowry and, therefore not a case u/s.304B I.P.C and there being no eye witness to the occurrence and there is only speculation against the petitioner since she is the mother-in- law of the deceased, in whose house the unfortunate death had taken place, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 20.9.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Begusarai in Muffasil (Singhoul) P.S.case No.328 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and (ii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that she will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if she fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, her bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )