-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO.258 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.258 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.258 OF 2006 Radhakishan Chunnilal Somani ...Appellant Vs. Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai ...Respondent Mr.R.S.Ghadge for the Appellant Mr.J.J.Xavier for the Respondent. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: APRIL 21,2006. APRIL 21,2006. APRIL 21,2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The Affidavit of the Constituted attorney of the Appellant is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. In view of the said Affidavit, Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 2. If an Application is made by the Appellant for regularization of the suit structure within a period of four weeks from today, the concerned Authority of the Respondent-Corporation will decide the same within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the Application. If the application for regularisation is made within stipulated period, status quo as of today will be maintained for a period of twenty weeks from today by both the parties. The order passed on application for regularisation will be communicated by the Respondent-Corporation to the Applicant within a period of one week from the date of passing the order. If the application for regularisation is not made within stipulated period, the Respondent-Corporation is free to take action against the disputed structure. -2- Judge. Judge. Judge. Judge. Judge. Judge.