FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE L.P.A.ST NO.1817 OF 2001 a/w CIVIL APPLICATION NO.253 OF 2001 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:----------------------------------- Mr T.R.Yadav with Mr N.A.Kulkarni, for the applicant/appellant. None for the respondent. CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. DATED: 18.10.2005 P.C.: Request for adjournment on behalf of the appellant is rejected. The impugned order is, obviously, passed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Apart from that, it has confirmed the findings of fact recorded by the courts below. In such circumstances, the Letters Patent Appeal against such orders is not tenable. Hence, the appeal dismissed. The civil application also stands disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (V.G.PALSHIKAR,J.)