IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16707 of 2009 RAM PADARATH SINGH S/O LATE MOLA SINGH R/O VILL.- CHHEMA, P.O.- BELAW, VIA- BARBIGHA, P.S.- SHEKHPUR AND DISTT.- SHEKHPURA ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATNA. 4. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BHOJPUR, ARA. 5. ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA. 6. TREASURY OFFICER, PATNA. ---Respondents ----------- 6. 19.3.2010 This case has been listed under the heading “To Be Mentioned” at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that due to inadvertence some mistakes have occurred in the order dated 22.2.2010. Learned counsel submits that in the address of petitioner, P.S. is mentioned as “Shekhpur” but the same has been typed as “Shekhpura”. Further, he points out that in the third paragraph of the aforesaid order the date of superannuation has wrongly been mentioned as 31st of December, 2003, instead of 31st of December, 2002 and in the third line of the said paragraph, the petitioner is shown as Assistant Sub Inspector of Police instead of Sub-Inspector of Police. Let the P.S. be read as “Shekhpur”, the date of superannuation be read as “31st December, 2002” and the post be read as Sub-Inspector of Police”. The order dated 22.2.2010 is modified to the above extent only. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)