AJN 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2344 OF 2009 Manda Baban Gonate ... Petitioner Vs. Municipal Commissioner for Pune Municipal Corporation (SRA), Pune & Ors. ... Respondents ALONG WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2345 OF 2009 Santosh Cycle Mart ... Petitioner Vs. Municipal Commissioner for Pune Municipal Corporation (SRA), Pune & Ors. ... Respondents ALONG WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3684 OF 2009 Madhukar Mahadev Marne & Anr. ... Petitioners Vs. Municipal Commissioner for Pune Municipal Corporation (SRA), Pune & Ors. ... Respondents AJN 2 Mr. Pendse i/b Ms. Jyoti Chavan for the petitioners. Mr. D.R. More for respondent 2. CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 10TH DECEMBER, 2009. P.C.:- 1. All these petitions can be disposed of by a common order since similar facts and issues are involved in these petitions. 2. The petitioners are the hutment dwellers residing at huts situate at 1005, Rajendra Nagar Zopadpatti, near P.M.C. Colony, Pune – 411 030. Respondent 1 is the Municipal Commissioner, the appropriate authority. Respondent 2 is the competent authority under respondent 1, who is empowered to decide upon the eligibility of the slum dweller for his/her entitlement to permanent alternate accommodation under the SRA Scheme. Respondent 3 is the developer and respondent 4 AJN 3 is the Co-operative Society of the slum dwellers occupying the said plot of land known as 'Rajendra Nagar'. 3. It is the case of the petitioners, inter alia, that though they have fulfilled all the eligibility criteria, they were not declared eligible under the SRA Scheme. 4. Learned counsel appearing for respondent 2 has drawn our attention to the Full Bench judgment of this court in Tulsiwadi Navnirman Co-op. Housing Society Limited & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. 2008 (1) All.M.R. 318. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners will approach the High Power Committee constituted pursuant to the judgment in Tulsiwadi Navnirman CHS Ltd. The petitioner may do so within a period of eight weeks from today. If the petitioners are aggrieved by the order passed by the High Power Committee, they will be at liberty to adopt such remedy AJN 4 as may be available to them in law. All contentions raised by the petitioners are kept open. 6. The petitions are disposed of. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [A.A. SAYED, J.]