IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-34194 of 2009 Date of decision: March 23, 2010 Suman and another Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present: Mr. Baljinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. S.S. Mor, Sr. DAG Haryana for the respondent – State Mr. R.N. Lohan, Advocate for the complainant DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 658 dated 6.10.2009 under Sections 498-A, 406/34 IPC registered at Police Station City Jind, District Jind. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No. 1 is married sister-in-law and petitioner No. 2 is brother-in-law of the complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that petitioner No. 1 was got married much prior to the marriage of complainant and she is having two kids and there is no demand of dowry either by petitioner No. 1 or petitioner No. 2. Moreover, no specific allegation of entrustment of dowry to the present petitioners are there and allegations in the FIR are vague and baseless. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that petitioner No. Crl. Misc. No. M-34194 of 2009 2 2 is a student of JBT and he has no connection with demand of dowry. Learned counsel for the respondent – State has not opposed the contentions raised by learned counsel for the petitioners. Keeping in view the contentions raised by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner No. 1 is married sister-in- law who got married prior to the marriage of complainant and residing separately and petitioner No. 2 is a student of JBT, the present petition is allowed and interim directions issued by this Court on 3.12.2009 are made absolute. The petition is disposed of accordingly. (DAYA CHAUDHARY) 23.03.2010 JUDGE reena