1 S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. IInd BAIL APPLICATION NO.2772/2006 (Shrawan Vs. State) Date of order : 7.7.2006 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. Rakesh Arora, for the applicant. Mr. L.R. Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the challan papers. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that first bail application was rejected by this Court vide order dated 1.6.2006 and liberty was granted to the applicant to file fresh bail application after filing of challan and now challan has been filed. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that all other co-accused have been enlarged on bail. Further, it is contended that in all four injuries were inflicted upon the body of injured out of which injury No.3 was assigned to the present applicant and after x-ray report, the said injury is found to be simple in nature. The applicant is behind the bars since last two months. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion, I think it just and proper to enlarge the 2 accused-applicant on bail. Accordingly, the second bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that the applicant Shrawan S/o Momata shall be released on bail (in FIR No.220/2006, P.S. Balotra) provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- and furnishes two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so, till the completion of trial. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. arun