IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.461 of 2009 SMT. GEETA SINGH, W/o BASANT KUMAR SINGH, R/O OF FLAT NO.C-103, CHARMINAR APARTMENT, ROAD 12, RAJENDRA NAGAR, PATNA-16. Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA THROUGH THE CHAIRMAN, SATATE BANK BHAWAN, MADAM CAMA ROAD, MUMBAI-400021 2. THE CHAIRMANM, STATE BANK OF INDIA, CORPORATE CENTRE, 18TH FLOOR, STATE BANK BHAWAN, MADAM CAMA ROAD, MUMBAI-400021 3. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, PATNA 4. THE CHIEF MANAGER (ADMINISTRATION), HR DEPARTMENT, STATE BANK OF INDIA, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, PATNA 5. THE DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CORPORATE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, STATE BANMK OF INDIA, CORP0ORATE CENTRE, 18TH FLOOR, STATE BANK BHAWAN, MADAM CAMA ROAD, MUMBAI-400021. ----- Respondents 2. 12.1.2009. In this public interest litigation, prayer of the petitioner is to command the respondents to act according to the circular contained in Annexure-1. Having heard Mr. Binod Kumar Singh for the petitioner, Mr. Chitranjan Sinha for the State Bank of India and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the opinion that this writ application is absolutely misconceived. This Court, in exercise of its writ jurisdiction, shall not, in public interest litigation, direct for enforcing of a particular circular governing the service condition. Application stands dismissed in limine. ahk (C. K. Prasad,ACJ) (Dr. Ravi Ranjan)