1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1464 OF 2009 Sadgun M. Parmar & 48 Ors. ...Petitioners. v. The Chief Executive Officer, Slum Rehabilitation Authority & 12 Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.Mihir Desai, adv. For the Petitioners. Mr.J.G.Aradwad (Reddy), adv. For the Respondent Nos.1, 11 and 13. Mr.K.R.Belosay, Addl. Govt. Pleader for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4. Mr.Uday Bobde, adv. for the Respondent No.8. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : 27th January , 2010. P.C. 1 Rule. Heard forthwith. 2 By the present petition, petitioners have approached for various reliefs. After hearing the parties and the controversy, in our opinion, this petition can be disposed off by issuing following directions: i At the hearing of the petition, on behalf of the petitioners, the learned counsel submits to us three charts, which are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for Identification. ii In so far as the first chart is concerned, it is described as Chart-I. There are names of 18 persons. According to the learned counsel 2 though these are persons were residing before the cut-off date, their names were not included in annexure II nor their names were considered by the High Power Committee. Considering the controversy, High Power Committee is directed to consider the cases of these 18 persons, whose names were included in Chart-I. iii The learned counsel then draws attention to the names of seven persons, whose names were included in Chart-II. Their names though included in Annexure-II, were held to be ineligible. Their grievance is that the High Power Committee did not re-examine the case of these seven persons. Considering the controversy, we direct the High Power Committee to consider and re-examine the cases of seven persons. iv Third case is of five persons, whose names were in Annexure-II were found eligible but the High Power Committee found them to be ineligible. In so far as these five persons are concerned, the learned counsel prays that their cases may be examined considering the material on record and material which now they can produce. In the light of that, High Power Committee is directed to consider the names of five persons, whose names were listed in Chart-III. v In the event, any persons whose names are included in 3 Chart-I, II and III want to file additional documents, it will be open to them to produce such documents alongwith their claims. Such an exercise be completed within two weeks from today. The High Power Committee considering the controversy may dispose off the entire claims at any rate not later than 12 weeks from today. Rule made absolute accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. To that extent, the order dated 5th January, 2009 is set aside. (J.H. BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)