THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.22688 of 2006 Dated 22nd June, 2011 Between: Akkala Vijayalakshmi and others …Petitioners And The District Collector, Ongole, Prakasam District and another …Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: None appeared Counsel for respondents: GP for Land Acquisition The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to set aside notification, dated 18.08.2006, issued by respondent No.1 under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short ‘the Act’). At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioners. The learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition submitted that pending this writ petition, respondent No.1 has issued notification in R.C.No.G2/2627/2006, dated 18.08.2008, under Section 48(1) of the Act withdrawing the impugned notification and declaration. In view of the above development that has taken place during the pendency of the writ petition, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, interim order, dated 01.11.2006, shall stand vacated and W.P.M.P.No.28827 of 2006 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 22nd June, 2011 VGB