kbp 1 31-05.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.31 OF 2005 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.450 OF 1993 IN WRIT PETITION NO.963 OF 2000 Mohammed Vazir Pathan ..Petitioner Vs. Mrs.Yamunabai S. Raikar and ors. ..Respondent ......... Mr.Aniket Nikam i/b.Mr.S.A.Sawant, for petitioner. ......... CORAM : A.S.OKA, J.. DATE : 25th November, 2009. P.C. : 1] Called out for final hearing. 2] The breach alleged in this contempt petition is of an order passed during the pendency of a writ petition. The breach alleged is of an interim order which was to operate during the pendency of this writ petition. 3] The learned counsel for the petitioner states that after the notice was issued by this Court in this contempt petition, the main writ petition has been finally disposed of. As a result of which, the dispute between the parties does not survive. 4] Perusal of order dated 4 th February, 2003 of which the breach is alleged to be committed shows that a statement/undertaking of the certain respondents in the writ petition was recorded that the said respondents would pay municipal taxes and rates payable to the Corporation within two months and will continue kbp 2 31-05.sxw to pay future tax and rates to the Corporation till the disposal of the petition. 5] Considering the subsequent development, this is not a case where any further action is required to be taken against the contemnors. Hence, the notice issued against the contemnors is discharged. Contempt Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. ( A.S.OKA, J. )