Wp853.10 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 853 OF 2010 Shri Baban Gopinath Patil ....Petitioner. Vs. M/s. Eldee Valvet Industries Ltd. & Anr. ....Respondents. Mr. Ravindran Nair for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 7th April, 2010 P.C.: 1 The Petitioner has challenged the order of dismissal of the Appeal dated 26/09/2004, passed by the Industrial Court, Thane, whereby after giving detailed reasoning, the Court has confirmed/maintained the order passed by the Labour Court, that resulted into the rejection of the Petitioner’s case of proper and legal termination and/or disproportionate punishment. 2 Against the impugned order, the Petitioner has preferred this Writ Petition on 07/12/2009 by giving justification to the effect that he was not getting details of the Respondents and after searched the record of D.R.T., and after getting the same, the Petitioner preferred the present Petition. 3 This, in my view, just cannot be the reason to prefer and/or to Wp853.10 2 challenge the impugned order, whereby the Petitioners Appeal was dismissed. 4 It is necessary to note that the basic application is of the year 1979. The labour Court has passed the order on 25/03/1997 and maintained by the Industrial Court on 29/06/2004. 5 Therefore, in view of above itself, the petition is dismissed on the grounds of delay and latches. No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)