<nwn WNKD "3'55T ^ll^td^ ^Tll^^Ko, 'f^TRfy: ^^....^..C.O,..A.&....J.3.^200 ^ff^T 175RT (^lt^P^) ^^ ^T ^i^h ^WT^n^TsCTN? •X ^KIW< ^a^^i 011^^1 PETITIONER Umesh Sinj 20 years,!^ Premnagar.,1 Verfcus RESPONDBNTS 1. 2. 3. 4. State of Panchayat Raipur (CG) The Con| Examination] The C^llecto^ The Chief Es Nagar, Distt. Writ Petitiou uader Article C|hhattisgarh, Through The Secreta^, Rural Development, DKS Bhawan, iT>ller, Chhattisgarh, Professional Board, Raipur (CG) Surguja^ Distt. Surguja (CG) scutive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Prem |Surguja (CG) ofthe Constitutiou oflndia 2126 S.B Hoa^ble Shri Dhirendra Mlslhra, J, 14.01.2009 Scieliice Shri A,N, Paiidey, leamed cc| ShriY.S. Thakur, leamed D^ Gnevaiice of flie petitioner for appoiatnient on fhe post of S] Science Group, the petitioner app( 50% marks aad his rank ui Gronp it was 18. He was caUed fo educational certi&cates, however, tlie Ust ofselected caadidates. The petitioner flien filed Suguja/respondent No,3 agaiast selected Ust of Shikshakarmi G Surgiija directed tiie Chief Executitre <:ti^E^41^ T?i^f ^? t^st <Sv»i<^i< ^T3tf^H3H^¥ h Netaiii,8/o Shri Alam Sai, Aged about 'o Village Chandan Nagar, P.S. 8s Block- Tahsil-Surajpur, Distt, Surguja (CG) |unsel for the petitioner. AG for the State. |s fhaf in. response to advertisement ^ikshakarmi Grade-III (ST Category), lared in fhe examJTmfion, He secured Groiip was 46 whereas in. Arts ^ counselmg where he subaiitted his |iame ofthe petitioner was inissuig ui ?presentation before the CoUector, 1 non-uiclusion of his nam.e ia the |rade-III, whereupon fhe CoUector, Officer/respondent No.4 to decide ??R^W^N^i!^ <H'li^tH—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000. ,^^-?rT [C—78 ^5£T''<ii^t<>Ti{, y^WK^, [atdl'y1^ 3?^^r1^iw 'ci<?T '37I^T$CT{c^ 1^' y'- V- ^ ^i^w»«y^ira^ 'F|20© SH^T "^SF (il^srf^at^) WTO^^fef^lt^ 2- Iiis representation. The res]: 14,10.2008 du'ected flie petitioner to produce his Class-XII raark-sheet witiim. a period of seven decided. Accordiagly, fhe No.4 ou 16.10.2008 along sheet of Class-XII, however, representation even after a 1 Shri Y.S. Thakur, le submits tliat ia case the pc respondent No,4 for redress witliiii a period of 10 days froni the date of receipt of fU the iiistant petition is dispol fresh representation before raised io. his petitbn withid representation beiag niade, fhe saine in accordance witb fironi the date of receipt of1^ fepsft^ ^R^ff "^ fe^t ^F^'^R '^'^f^r^T^T bndent No,4 vide his memoraa^dum datecl |ays so fh.at his representation uiay be ^etitioner appeared before fhe respondent rifh his testiiaonials iacluduig fhe mark- respondent No,4 has not yet decided his ipse ofalmost three niontiis. ^nled Dy. AG appearmg for fhe State titioner files a fresh representation before (al of his grievaace raisecl in this petition |rom. today, fhe same shall be considered aad decided by fhe said aut|iority wifhiii a furtlier periocl of two weeks representation, In view of above subrjussions of leanied counsel for fhe parties, ?d ofwith Uberty to Uie petitioner to file £i respondeut No.4 raisiag all his grievance a period of 10 days froni today. On such espoudent No,4 shall consider aiid decide law wiUiia. a further period of two weeks representation, Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge ^-S»;¥.:?^TB,<^..w*-^<^fr^<Mar-<iihit.s»j>^ ^.