IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.414 of 2011 JAYDEEP KUMAR @ BITTU SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This is an application for anticipatory bail in Narhat (Sitamarhi) P.S. Case no. 122 of 2009 and for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 302, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner along with others is that they went to the shop of the accused and asked for goods then they abused and assaulted the informant. It is alleged that one Shyam Kishore Singh gave a danda on the chest of the father, who is succumbed to injuries. It is also stated by the witnesses including the informant at para 3,8,9,12, 13, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 and 30 of the case diary about the participation of the petitioner in the incidence. Hence having regard to the fact and circumstance, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. However, if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail then the same may be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order. Amit ( Gopal Prasad, J.)