IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital the April 07th, 2006 Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 201 of 2006 Order on the bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE 1. Ranjeet Singh S/o Late Shri Ram Singh R/o Village Danya, Patwari Cricle Danya, Teshil Bhanoli District-Almora 2. Dikshit Pant S/o Shri Devi Dutt R/o Village Gauli, Patwari Circle Danya Tehsil Bhanoli District-Almora 3. Kishan Singh Bisht S/o Shri Himmat Singh R/o Village Faltia At present Shopkeeper Danya Tehsil Bhanoli District-Almora ……Applicants Versus State of Uttaranchal …Opposite Party Arising out of case crime No. 1 of 2006 Under Sections 302, 2001 and 120 (B) I.P.C. Registered on the basis of F.I.R. dt. 26.01.2006 At Patwari Circle Barakuna Tehsil Bhanoli District-Almora Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Heard Sri R.P. Nautiyal learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Amrish Tiwari learned counsel for the complainant and learned A.G.A. for the State. Perused the record. The case rests upon the circumstantial evidence. There is only last scene evidence against the applicants. It was contended that after two days of the incident i.e. 27.1.2006 the statement of Rakesh Chandra Gururani was recorded in which he has stated only with regard to the last scene evidence. When the statement of the said witness was recorded on 29.1.2006, he had given a different version. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is a fit case for bail. Let the applicants-accused be released on bail on executing a personal bond each and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the C.J.M. concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat,J) Dated 07.04.2006 LSR