TN OF TATA4 AT RGOP DAT’D !TS ¶tP 3OT !‘ OF J T1 I99 J”S T1 ’T H.t.D*Ti S i. Pandu rang ‘Tarayanappa Vijapur, Age:Major, Working as High School Heed Master, Presently at Asst Master Sri,agaguru U3jaini Gnanaurt Sad’arna Siddallngeswara ‘posite Jimior Co11eg, ubehal, Kundgol Taluk, Dharwar District, : PTT!O’R (Sr1.,M.Sidappa for PetItioner) 1, The State of Ta atakg by Its eopeta, Fducation Deparbnent, M..uiIding, Bangaore, • , . .2 2 The Joint Director of Public Instructions, Belgatn Division, Belgaun, 3, The Deputy Dietor of Public Thstruetions, Dharwar District, Dharwar, 4, The Secretary, Sri Jagadgtiru Ujjainl Sath1aia Si’iihasane Gnanaguru Vidyapeetha ‘jjaini, B’di—ottz, ellery, : WSPODTPS (Sri.S.UdayBshanlar, AGA, for I to 3) This Writ Petit’nn filed under Articles 9°6 & 227 of the Constitution o India with an affidavit paing to declare that the action of the spondent No.3 in disallowing the salary of the petitioner is hIghly illegal and wIthout authority of law as per AnnexD and etc,, This Writ Petition caning on for hearing this day, the Court made the followjng 0 DR , —3— 0 RDR Petitioner in this Writ Petition is staff working in aided private educational institutions. is before this Court interalia seeking directions to the respondents to accord certain service benefits including monetary benefits. In my view, these reliefs cannot be granted by this Court in vei.w of the observations made by a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.Nos. 1833 to 1836/1995 disposed off on 30.5.1998. This Court while considering the issue whether the staff (Teaching and non—teaching) working in educational institutions run by private management can maintain Writ Petitions to claim financial aid from the State Governnientøin the absence of Master and Servant relation and other incidental issues, was pleased to observe that the writ petitions filed by teaching and non— teaching staff of private educational institutions are not ‘.4 —4— are not maintainable before this Court. Respectfully following the çbservations made in the aforesaid decision, this petition is disposed off as not maintainable before this Court for the reliefs sought therein. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approach the proper forum as suggested by this Court in the aforesaid decision. Ordered accordingly. Sd/-JUDGE. f/ 4 w, \\ r.by High Court of !iatek Bnga1or-56@ 001,