wp10582.10 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.10582 OF 2010 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | The learned Counsel for the petitioner mentioned the matter today for speaking to minutes. None appears for the respondent. 2 In the order dated 1.12.2010 passed in Writ Petition No. 10582/2010, there is mistake in mentioning the impugned order. Hence, the order dated 1.12.2010, as corrected, shall be read as under: “Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2 Since the respondent is represented through Counsel and wp10582.10 2 after hearing for some time, the learned Counsel for both parties agree that by setting aside the impugned order, the matter can be remitted back to the Labour Court with direction to decide the pending complaint. 3 The learned Counsel for the respondent, on instructions from his client, submits that if this Court is of the opinion that the impugned order passed by the Industrial Court is not sustainable, then without observing anything on merits, the said order can be set aside by giving directions to the Labour Court to dispose of the complaint (ULP) No.52 of 2009 within a specific period. 4 On the concession given by the learned Counsel for the parties, writ petition stands disposed of by wp10582.10 3 setting aside the impugned order passed by the Industrial Court dated 20th October, 2010. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Latur is directed to hear and dispose of the Complaint (ULP)No. 52/2009 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. Writ Petition is allowed to above extent and stands disposed of.” Authenticated copy of this order may be supplied. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) 20.12.2010. PLK/*