IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CRMMO No.215 of 2010 Date of decision : November 12, 2010 Sukhpreet Singh and others …Petitioners. Versus Bhim Singh Mankotia and others …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners : M/s Bhuvnesh Sharma & Ramakant Sharma, Advocates. For the Respondents : None. Surjit Singh, J (Oral) Heard and gone through the record. 2. A criminal complaint has been instituted against the present petitioners and the proforma-respondents by respondent No.1 Bhim Singh, alleging that the petitioners and the proforma-respondents are threatening him to sell his share, in some joint property, in their favour. Learned Judicial Magistrate, after recording preliminary evidence, has passed the impugned order, for summoning the petitioners and the proforma-respondents. 3. Grievance of the petitioners is that a civil litigation is going on, in a Court in Punjab, for partition of the shares of the petitioners in some joint property, in which respondent No.1 Bhim Singh is also a co-sharer and that since civil proceedings are going on, criminal proceedings cannot be initiated or allowed to continue. Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? …2… 4. Submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners is misconceived. Allegation in the private complaint, filed by respondent No.1, has no relevance with the suit for partition. His allegation is that he is being pressurized and intimidated to sell his share in the joint property, partition of which has been sought in the suit instituted in a Court in Punjab. Hence, the present petition is dismissed. 5. I notice from the impugned order that the learned Judicial Magistrate has observed that prima facie case is made out against the petitioners and the proforma- respondents. At the stage of summoning the accused, under Section 204 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a finding cannot be recorded that a prima facie case is there. Only satisfaction is required to be recorded that there are sufficient grounds to proceed against an accused. With regard to the existence of a prima facie case, order is required to be passed only at the stage of consideration of the point, whether charge should be framed or not and such an order is passed, after hearing both the sides. Learned Judicial Magistrate may keep in mind this observation, in future. Petition stands disposed of. November 12, 2010(sd) ( Surjit Singh ), J