// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5084/2007 Rohitash S/o Shri Ramsahai Versus Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and Others Date of Order ::: 25.09.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Ms. Madhu Meena, Advocate, for Shri Ganesh Meena, Counsel for petitioner #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition challenging the impugned order dated 10th May, 2007 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Neem-Ka-Thana, District Sikar, whereby the learned Tribunal passed an order to lodge an FIR against the petitioner. It appears from the impugned order that while deciding the case on 3rd February, 2006 the said court issued a notice to the petitioner to show cause as to why an appropriate action in accordance with law may not be taken against him for filing a forged claim petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner informs that the FIR had already been // 2 // registered against the petitioner and, after investigation of the case, a challan has also been filed and the petitioner is facing trial. I have also examined the impugned order passed by the learned Tribunal and, after considering the same, I do not find any illegality, perversity or jurisdictional error in it so as to interfere with the same. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//