IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. ORDER S.B. CRMINAL MISC. THIRD BAIL APPLICATION NO.6605/2008 13.10.2008. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Shri S.B. Mathur , for the petitioner. Shri Shushil Sharma, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This is a third bail application filed by the accused petitioner. The first bail application bearing No.5553/2006 was dismissed by this court vide order dated 19.01.2007 on merits. The petitioner then moved second bail application S.B. Criminal Misc. Second Bail Application No.3827/2008 which was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 17.7.2008 by this court. Soon thereafter this third bail application has been filed on 5.9.2008. The principle submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been suffering from Hypertension and Diabities and as such he requires to undergo treatment and was admitted to the Jail Hospital also on 17.2.2006 and again on 7.8.2008. Hence he may be released on bail. The learned Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the Union of India has submitted that so far as the above grounds are concerned they were available during the hearing of the first bail application filed by the accused petitioner and nothing new has been pointed out so far as the ailments of the petitioner are concerned. The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that only about 5 or 6 prosecution witnesses are remaining to be examined from the side of the prosecution and in all possibilities by the end of November, 2008 the prosecution evidence shall be completed. In the above facts and circumstances, therefore, I find that there is no good ground for enlarging the accused petitioner on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. at this stage on the above grounds. This third bail application is accordingly dismissed. (DALIP SINGH),J. Ramchandrkhatri,PS