IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.10435 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION : JULY 16, 2010 ADHAR KUMAR ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Shri Adhar Kumar, petitioner in person. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1. Petitioner-Adhar Kumar is present in person and states that he wants to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition after appending relevant document(s). The petitioner further states that the relevant documents were given to the counsel - Shri G.K.S. Taank, Advocate, however, the same have not been appended, for reasons best known to the counsel. The petitioner further states that 'No Objection Certificate' is not being given by the counsel and, therefore, the petitioner is not able to engage another counsel. Misconduct on the part of the counsel is alleged. 2. Shri G.K.S. Taank, Advocate, states that he has not received his fee and, therefore, this Court, in these proceedings, should address the issue and have his fee recovered. Civil Writ Petition No.10435 of 2010 2 3. It is most unfortunate on the part of the Advocate to bring the issue in relation to fee and other disputes intra him and his client to this Court. 4. Be that as it may, considering the oral prayer of Shri Adhar Kumar (petitioner in person) to file a fresh petition after placing on record the relevant documents, through another counsel, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition. 5. The issue of the alleged misconduct of the counsel can be carried by the petitioner to the Bar Council, as such issues cannot be addressed in these proceedings. July 16, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?