^w itON IN'BU iinRM ;UNiL Forum for Fact findinc Documentation and Advocac-y, (A Regd. Society under the Societies Registratlon Act, C/o A- 3, Shahni Vihar, Telibandha Ring Road No.1, P.0. Ravigram, Raipur Chhattisgarh - 492 006 Through it's Director, Subash Chandra Mohapstra) The Union of India, Through its Secretary, Ministry of Health, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. Ministry of Home, Through its Secretary, Shastri Bhawan, New De!hi. »- The State of Chhattis? Through its Government of Chhattisgarh, Department of Heaith and Family Welfare, D.K.S, Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) The Secretar/, Government of Chhattisgarh, Department of Home affairs, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) The Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Department of Woman and Child Deve'Qpment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantrataya, Ralpur (C.G.) National Riahi Commission, • Throua'n Chair S^n ^ ^^'ws'??^ ^3 ^'i':., :%€^sw// 'VaaaeesS^' ^SC w'"" ': '} -^ \'\ pi s -^. 7. 8. Person, Faridkot House, Coperman Marg, New Delhi. State Human Right Commission, Through its Chairperson, Near Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) The Director General of Police, Police Head Quarter District Raipur (C.G.) Petition UrrieiLArticle 226_of theConstitutjon_of!ndia Shri Saurabh Dangi, Counsel for the petitioner. Shri Bhishma Kinger, Standing Counsel for 1 &2. . 1 Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, Dy. Advocate General for the State/respondents No.3, 4, 5 & 8. None for respondents No.6 & 7. liowina order of the Court was passed Learned counsel forthe parties are heard. 2) Shri Bhishma Kinger, Standing Counsel for the Union of India/ respondents No.1 & 2 and Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, Dy. Advocate General Tor the State/respondents No.3, 4, 5 & 8 submitted that the issues raised by the petitioner in this writ petition filed as PIL are the subjeet matter of the writ petition flled before the Hon'ble Apex Court as PIL under Article 32 of the Constitution of India and the same has been registered as W.P.(C) No.250/2007 and is pending for consideration before She Apex Court. ^!ssxs- »<•°•-» ^ '>. •: '\ padma 3) In this view of the matter, we are of the opinion that no parallel monitoring by the High Court in this writ petition is required. 4) The writ pstition is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. 5) The security amount of Rs.5000/- deposited by the ;itioner be refunded to the petitioner. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge