IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.42 OF 2007 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.201 OF 2004 Shri.Bajirao Kondiba Chikane ...Applicant Versus Snehachandra Hiralal Dalal, since deceased through his heirs and legal representatives: 1a) Smt.Sarojben Snehachandra Dalal & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.M.N.Dhamal for Applicant. Mr.Kishore Jain with Ms.Sheetal S.Shah i/b Mehta & Girdharlal for Respondents 1a to 1c. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. MARCH 7, 2007. MARCH 7, 2007. MARCH 7, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Counsel for Respondents 1a to 1c is opposing this Application. He submits that the Applicant should not be permitted to deposit the amount in Court, as the stand of the concerned Respondents is that the Applicant is not the tenant : 2 : in respect of the suit property. 2. In view of the objection taken on behalf of Respondents 1a to 1c, Applicant is absolved from his responsibility to deposit the amount in Court. Applicant may, however, deposit requisite amount in a separate account to be maintained by him, if so advised to avoid any future legal consequence. With this observation, Application disposed of. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.