- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.8345 OF 2003 Mr.S.S. Kulkarni for the Petitioner. Mr.Tanaji Mhatugade for Respondent No.6. ----------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s appearances, Court’s orders order or directions ----------------------------------------------------- ¦ ¦ ¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. ¦ DATED: 8TH JUNE,2005 P.C.: Both the courts below have concurrently found that the Petitioner is not entitled to any temporary injunction. The order of temporary injunction is in the discretion of the Court. When the two courts have concurrently found that the Petitioner is not entitled to any temporary injunction, in my opinion, such an order cannot be intereferred with in the jurisdiction of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition disposed of. - 2 - ...