IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Ist Bail Application No.870 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Bijendra ..….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …….Opposite party Dated: October 4, 2010 __________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No.94 of 2010 U/Ss 302/34, 120-B IPC P.S. Jhebreda, District Haridwar ______________________________________________________________ Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Urgency Application No.3773 of 2010 is allowed. Heard Mr. S.K. Shandiliya, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, learned Addl. GA for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is not named in the FIR and the case rests upon the circumstantial evidence and the chain of circumstances is not complete against the applicant to connect him with the said crime. He further submitted that the co-accused Teetu has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 22.9.2010 and the present applicant is also entitled for bail on the basis of parity. After considering all the facts and circumstances; on hearing learned counsel for the parties; on perusal of the contents of FIR and other papers available on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Bijendra be released on bail on his executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Haridwar. The bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 4.10.2010 RG