WP(C) 2354/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY The petitioner who was appointed as an Assistant Teacher in the Motiram Bora H.S . Balika Vidyapith by the Inspector of Schools Nagaon on 30.1.1996 and whose se rvices was regularized thereafter on 1.9.2000 on the strength of the Government communication dated 12.6.2000, is aggrieved by non-disbursal of her regular sala ries, (except for few months) since the date of her appointment in the year 1996 . 2. Mr. S. Chakraborty, learned Counsel refers to the communication of the Director of Secondary Education, Assam on 26.4.2006 (Annexure-10) and als o the next communication dated 26.3.2009 (Annexure-16), to show that all similar ly appointed teachers are getting their Pay, whereas the petitioner is being tr eated differently. 3. Mr. M.R. Pathak, learned Senior Standing Counsel however submits that the petitioner was appointed without selection and her regularization was ordered on the basis of the authorization letter dated 12.6.2000 (Annexure-2), w hich authorization was subsequently found to be illegal and incompetent and that might be the reason the petitioner is not being paid her salary. However the De partmental Counsel submits that the case of the petitioner may be referred for c onsideration by the Committee constituted by the Government, in pursuant to the decision in Sudhendu Mohan Talukdar vs State of Assam reported in 2006 (2) GLT 2 16, as the said Committee is considering similar grievances of non-payment of s alaries of the appointed teachers. 4. Mr. S. Chakraborty, learned Counsel for the petitioner has no ob jection if the petitioner’s claim for payment of salary is referred for consider ation by the Committee. 5. In view of the above agreement amongst the learned Counsels, the petitioner is permitted to submit a representation to the Director, Secondary E ducation, Assam who will place the petitioner’s representation before the Commis sioner, Education, who in turn will ensure consideration of the petitioner’s cla im for salary, by the Committee constituted by the Government under Sudhendu Moh an Talukdar (Supra). The Committee would thereafter take a decision on the merit of the petitioner’s claim. 6. With the above direction, the case stands disposed of.