HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1286 OF 2005 JUDGMENT: This Criminal Revision Case is preferred by the petitioner- accused against the judgment, dated 04.08.2005, rendered in Criminal Appeal No.474 of 2003 by the VI Addl. Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Tirupathi. 2. The petitioner-accused was prosecuted in C.C.No.54 of 2000 for the offences punishable under Sections 457, 380 or 411 IPC. After due trial, the learned III Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tirupathi, convicted the petitioner under Section 248 (2) Cr.P.C. and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for six months and to pay a fine of Rs.200/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for one month for the offence punishable under Section 411 IPC while acquitting him of the other offence, vide judgment, dated 17.12.2003. 3. As against the said conviction, the petitioner-accused filed Criminal Appeal No.474 of 2003 on the file of the VI Addl. Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Tirupathi, and the learned Sessions Judge, after re-appreciation of both the oral and documentary evidence, dismissed the Criminal Appeal while confirming the conviction and sentence recorded against the petitioner-accused by the learned Magistrate, vide judgment, dated 04.08.2005. Challenging the same, the petitioner preferred this revision. 4. Heard both sides. 5. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner by not pressing the main prayer confined his arguments to the extent of imposition of sentence and requested the Court to show some indulgence on the petitioner. 6. In view of the said submission and also the fact that the trial Court as well as the appellate Court have given concurrent findings, this Court is of the view that the merits and demerits of the prosecution case and the impugned judgment need not be adjudicated. 7. It is represented that the petitioner is the sole bread winner of his family and has to look after the welfare of his family members. Admittedly, the offence took place in the year 2000 and for all these years the petitioner suffered humiliation. In these circumstances, this Court is inclined to show some lenience towards the petitioner. 8. Accordingly, the conviction recorded against the petitioner-accused by the trial Court for the offence punishable under Section 411 IPC as confirmed by the appellate Court is confirmed and the sentence of imprisonment is modified to that of the period already undergone by the petitioner-accused. Besides the fine of Rs.200/- imposed by the trial Court, the petitioner is directed to pay additional fine of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two thousand only) before the trial Court within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, in default to suffer simple imprisonment for two (2) months. 9. In all other respects, the impugned judgment shall stand confirmed. 10. With the above modification, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. _________________ RAJA ELANGO, J 27th January, 2011 cbs HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1286 OF 2005 DATE: 27.01.2011 Between : Patan Mahaboob Basha … Petitioner/ Accused and State of A.P. ..Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1286 of 2005 (Disposed of) 27th January, 2011 cbs