CR No.1524 of 2010 1 In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. Decided on 12.5.2010. Haryana Wakf Board,Ambala Cantt --Petitioner vs. Prem Singh Jogi -- Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.G.S.Bhatia,Advocate,for the petitioner Rakesh Kumar Jain, J, This revision petition is directed against the order dated 22.8.2009 passed by the Wakf Tribunal, Ambala, by which suit for possession filed by the petitioner has been dismissed by the Tribunal with the following observations:- “Admittedly, plaintiff had filed an application for amendment of the plaint in this Court wherein, he had requested that he be allowed to amend the plaint to incorporate dimensions of the suit property. However, the same was dismissed by the predecessor of this Court. The revision against the same has also been dismissed by the Hon'ble High Court as stated by the counsel for the parties. CR No.1524 of 2010 2 The plaint does not contain the dimensions of the suit property. The case of the defendant is that he is not in possession of the suit property. Defendant has given the dimensions of the house, in which, he is residing. He has also filed on the record site-plan of his house. After going through the plaint and evidence led by the parties. I am of the considered view that suit property is not identifiable. For want of proper identification and dimensions of the suit property, I am of the considered view that plaintiff is not entitled to the possession of the suit property. Since, the suit property is not identifiable, defendant cannot be restrained from raising any construction over the same. I find both these issues against the plaintiff. Learned counsel for the petitioner though argued for some time, ,but he could not find fault with the aforesaid observations of the Tribunal that because in the absence of identification of the suit property, decree would be vague and could not be executed. Thus, in my view, reasoning adopted by the learned Court below is well in accordance with law and for that matter, the suit of the plaintiff/petitioner has been rightly dismissed. In view of the above, I do not find any merit in this revision petition and the same is hereby dismissed in limine, though with no order as to costs. 12.5.2010 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge CR No.1524 of 2010 3