IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN FRIDAY, THE 18TH DECEMBER 2009 / 27TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2930 of 2009() ------------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 20/04/2009 IN CMP.624/09 IN CC.495/2007 OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, KOTHAMANGALAM .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED: ------------------------------------------------ 1. SANOJ, AGED 22 YEARS, S/O. POULOSE, CHITTIYATH HOUSE, KURUKKULAMBHAGOM, NELLIMATTOM KARA, KUTTAMANGALAM VILLAGE. 2. FR.POULOSE, S/O. THOMAS, AGED 58 YEARS, CHITTIYATH HOUSE, KURUKKULAMBHAGOM, NELLIMATTOM KARA, KUTTAMANGALAM VILLAGE. 3. ALIYAMMA, AGED 55 YEARS, W/O. POULOSE, CHITTIYATH HOUSE, KURUKKULAMBHAGOM, NELLIMATTOM KARA, KUTTAMANGALAM VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJEEV RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: ------------------------------------------------ STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. (CRIME NO.116 OF 2007 OF OONNUKAL POLICE STATION). PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR.JAYAKRISHNAN THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/ 12 / 2009 , THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.S.GOPINATHAN, J. ---------------------------------------- Crl.R.P. NO. 2930 OF 2009 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of December, 2009 O R D E R After arguing the revision petition for sometime, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner sought permission to withdraw the revision petition with liberty to the 3rd revision petitioner to apply for a discharge under Section 239 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In the above circumstance this revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the 3rd revision petitioner to prefer a petition for discharge under Section 239 of the code of Criminal Procedure, in the event no charge is framed by the trial court. The learned Magistrate shall dispose of the case within 4 months. P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE mns