1 WP4034.11 Kambli IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4034 OF 2011 ... Govind Punjaji Mavkar since deceased through his legal representatives Shri Mahadu Govind Mavkar and anr. ...Petitioners v/s. The Regional Commissioner & Chief Controlling Officer, Rehabilitation, Pune Region, Pune and ors. ...Respondents ... Mr.P.B.Shah for the Petitioners. Mr.V.S.Gokhale, AGP for State. ... CORAM: D.K.Deshmukh & Anoop V. Mohta, JJ DATED: 25th August, 2011 P.C.: Heard. The Petitioner’s application was under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act for deletion of land from Survey No. 421 from acquisition. The Commissioner in his order has observed that the possession of the land from Survey No.421 was taken on 10-1-1992. Therefore, in the application filed 2 WP4034.11 under Section 48 for deletion of that land from acquisition in the year 2004, an order for deletion of land from Survey No. 421 could not have been made. 2. Though, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner orally argued that possession of the land in the year 1992 was not actually taken, there is no averment in the petition saying that the observation in the impugned order that possession of land from Survey No.421 was taken in the year 1992 is wrong. Petition has no substance. It is rejected. (Anoop V. Mohta, J.) (D.K.Deshmukh, J.) 3 WP4034.11 4 WP4034.11