IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH JANUARY 2011 / 15TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 38228 of 2010(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- C.K.RAJAN, HSA (MALAYALAM), GOVT. MODEL HSS CALICUT UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, P.O.CALICUT UNIVERSITY, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN SRI.V.VENUGOPAL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, MALAPPURAM-676 505. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 3. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.38228/2010-C ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 5th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved by the non consideration of Exts.P6 and P7 representations. He has pointed out certain anomalies in respect of Ext.P5 Circular. The petitioner is presently working as H.S.A. (Malayalam) in G.M.H.S.S., Calicut University Campus. He entered service as P.D Teacher on 14/07/1987. After acquisition of required qualification, the petitioner was temporarily promoted as H.S.A (Malayalam) on 10/06/1996. Regular promotion was not ordered at that point of time, according to the petitioner, wrongly. Later, by Ext.P3 order, promotion was granted on regular basis and now it is regularised with effect from 10/06/1996. The provisional seniority list of H.S.As has been published for the period from 01/01/1991 to 31/12/1996 by the second respondent wherein he is serial No.1982. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the W.P.(C). No.38228/2010 -:2:- petitioner's service as H.S.A has to be regularised from the year 1994, the date on which his juniors were promoted. 3. I am not considering anything on the merits of the matter. There will be a direction to the first respondent to take a decision on Ext.P7 representation along with other objections to the seniority list, if any. The claim for retrospective regularisation will also be considered in accordance with the relevant rules. Appropriate orders will be passed expeditiously, at any rate, within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of the writ petition along with a copy of the Judgment before the first respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms \\TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE