THE HON’BLE M.SJUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO.17434 OF 2009 DT.21.08.2009 Between: S.Bojanna .Petitioner Vs. APSRTC, represented by its VC & MD, Musheerabad, Hyderabad and another. ………….Responents. The learned counsel for the petitioner: P.Govinda Rajulu The learned counsel for the respondents: B.G.Uma Devi, S.C. for APSRTC. THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: O R D E R: The petitioner, who was working as Conductor with A.P.State Road Transport Corporation, was removed from service on 15.09.2003. This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the alleged inaction on the part of the respondents in paying the terminal benefits to which the petitioner is entitled to under law. It is pleaded that in spite of repeated requests made by the petitioner, the respondent-Corporation failed to respond. Heard Sri P.Govinda Rajulu, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Smt.B.G.Umadevi, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation. Having regard to the fact that the representations made by the petitioner are pending, without expressing any opinion as to the entitlement of the petitioner for the terminal benefits claimed by him, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Corporation to consider the petitioner’s representation, dt.17.11.2008 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of this order. No costs. ___________ G.ROHINI J., Dt.21.08.2009 tjs