IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8655 of 2010 GANESH PRASAD SAHU, S/O LATE RAMKRIT SAH, R/O VILLAGE AGRER KHURD, P.S. AGRER KALA, P.S.-SURYAPURA, DISTRICT- ROHTAS. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DIRECTOR,AGRICULTURE,GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE JOINT DIRECTOR, AGRICULTURE, MITHAPUR AGRICULTURAL FARM,PATNA. 5. THE PLANT PROTECTION OFFICER, BHOJPUR, ARA. 6. THE PLANT PROTECTION OFFICER, ROHTAS, SASARAM. 7. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, BHOJPUR. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 17.5.2010 As prayed for on behalf of the petitioner, the District Provident Fund Officer, Bhojpur be added as respondent no.7. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State. The grievances of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 31st of July, 2008 from the post of Plant Protection Supervisor, Bhojpur, the full amount of G.P.F. and group insurance has not been paid. Besides the above, his pensionary benefits have not been revised taking into consideration the grant of Assured Career Progression (ACP). The learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the averments made in the writ application are not clear with regard to the claims of the petitioner. However, if any unpaid claim remains, the same shall be considered as per law without delay. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the 2 petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, the petitioner proposes to file a representation before the District Provident Fund Officer, Bhojpur (respondent no.7) with regard to the grievances relating to the unpaid claim of provident fund dues and for the rest of the claims, the petitioner proposes to file a separate representation before the Joint Director, Agriculture, Mithapur Agricultural Farm, Patna (respondent no.4). In case such separate representations are filed stating the details of the unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representations shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representations, so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)