1 ' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT B!LASPUR_ Civil Revision No. CS ^ J2011 PETITIONER: Dr. Sunil Mishra,S/o Late Shri Narmada Prasad Mishra aged about 58 years, Resident of Jarhabhata, Opposite Science Collage, Bilaspur (C.G.). ^ ^••<"3^ " -—— DEFENDANT No. 1 ^^-' RES^ONDENTS: 1. Ashok Mishra, S/o Late Shri Narmada Prasad Mishra aged about 69 ysars, Resident of Sadar Bazar, Bilaspur (C.G.); 2. State of C.G. Through the Collector Bilaspur. Formal defendant CIVIL REVISION UNDER SECTION 115. CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE. 1908 A HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CivU Revision No. 96/2011 PBTITIONER: Dr. Suiul Mishra, S/o Late Shri Nannada Rrasad Mishra, aged about 58 years, Resident of Jarhabhala, Opposite Science CoUege, Bilaspur (C.G.) -DEFENDANT No.l Versus RESPONDENTS: 1. Ashok Mishra, S/o Late Shri Nanaada Prasad Mishra, aged about 69-years, Resident of Sadar Bazar, Bilaspur (C.G.)-—PLAINTIPIi' 2. State of C.G. Through The CoUector Bilaspur. -—Formaldefendant No.2. CIVIL REVI8ION UNDER 8ECTION 115, CIVIL PROCEDURB CODE. 1908. Pl-esent:- Ms. Raksha Awasthy, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Mr. AMulAgrawal, P.L. forthe State/respondent No, 2. Respondeiit No. l not noticed. (SB: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma.J.) ORDER (Passed on 30/09/2011) 1. By this civil revision under Section 115 offhe Civil Procedure Code, 1908 petitioner has chaUenged fhe legaUty aad propnely of the order dated 10/12/2010 passed by 4th Civil Judge Class-1, Bilaspur (C.G.) in civU suit No. 36-A/2010. 2. Order impugned, copy of the plaint, copy of the Yaadashtnanta and copy of SCltwnati Patra perused. 3. As per law issues can be framed on fhe basis of pleadiug and documents in accordance with Order 14 Rule 3 (a) (b) (c) offhe Civil Procedure Code, 1908. Consideruig the ciyptic pleadiag and documcnts, I do,-not fuid any ground for interference ia the order icapugned. Consequenfly, civil revision te Uable to be dismissed and r ^ Wl i: 'if ^ye "^s S :/s -^&'' y is hereby disiuissed. However, petitioner is at liberty to take aU grounds in fhe suit which he has taken in present civil revision. No order as to costs. - 4. Inview offhe above, I.A. No. 1 stands disposed of. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge ^ r 'ti ! I1'i tM