IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4579 OF 2010 BETWEEN Sri Sarvasiddhi Uma Maheswarrao. …PETITIONER AND Smt. Neduri Meenakshi and two others. …RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioner: SMT. N(P) ANJANA DEVI SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondents: --NONE APPEARED-- The Court made the following: - ORDER: The second defendant in O.S.No.220 of 2007 before the IV Additional Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam filed an application being I.A.No.1015 of 2010 to reject Exs.A3 to A5 on the ground that they were marked fraudulently. The Court below rejected the said application giving liberty to the second defendant – petitioner herein, to agitate his grievances or objections at the time of final disposal of the suit. Aggrieved thereby this revision is filed. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that those documents are not original but were marked fraudulently and petitioner seeks adjudication of that aspect by the Court at this stage. 4. The aforesaid contention as well as the application before the Court below are wholly unsustainable inasmuch as the documents having been marked in the suit, pending trial, cannot be rejected. It is, however, open for the petitioner to agitate the truth, validity, genuineness and legality of any of the marked documents at the time of final disposal of the suit. The said liberty having been reserved to the petitioner under the impugned order itself no interference is called for. The civil revision petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J November 24, 2010 DSK