PETITION FR /oa//— / ® MTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR lCHHATl'ISGARHI OF 2006 Shiv Shankar Ram, Son of Late Shri Lekhuram, aged about 58 years, Occupation-Service Presently posted as Accountant In Janpad Panchayat Udaipur District Surgu1a (C G ) RESPONDENTS VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The SecketaryLMDepartment of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The. Collector, Surguja (C.G.). Indra Kumar Slngh Son of Note Known aged about 37 years, Assnstant Grade—II, Tahsll Pratappur, District Surguja (C.G.). ‘ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION QF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARI PROHIBITION ETC Ambikapur, District 1. . NRIT PETITION (S) No. 3MH 07.08.2006. Shri Vipin Tiwari, cbunsel fur the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Dy. Govt. AdVOCate for the Statelrespondents No. 1and 2, on advance copy. HeaTd. ‘By the instant petition, the petitioner has chalienged the transfer order dated 07.07.2006 (Annexure-P/1) whereby he has been transferred from Biock Udaipur to Block Pratappur. The main grievance of the petitioner is that he is an Accountant and respondent No.3 who is Asst. G -H and is not an Accountant, is being transferred on the post of Acco ntant where the petitioner is presentiy working. The petitioner is bein transferred in order to accommodate respondent No.3 as respondent 0.3 was transferred from Udaipur just before three months i.e. in the mo th of April 2006. in the circumstances, the petitioner may be aliowed > o make a detailed representation ' to respondent No. 2 -— Collector, Am ikapur, District Surguja and in tum, he be directed to decide the sa to which learned counsel for the State/respondents has no objecti . Having heard learned coun el for the parties, having regard to the facts and circumstance of the cas and without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, the prayer ma e by learned counsel for the petitioner appears to be just, fair and rea onabie. Therefore, the petitioner is allowed to make a detailed repre entation annexing copy of the instant writ petition, raising all his griev nces to respondent No.2 —- Collector (no that) r e m , o XI—HC—22 H W , W , W @c/d Wm w ‘€‘ pa I 3%qq\u»e Imam H 200 W msmw mm mmmw WW§WW %3T%11311%$T WE%H v XI-HC—22 N WHEtm w?wbg$c\k\ LQU2L00