FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10303 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6530 OF 2004 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Heard. The contention of the applicant is that he is not petitioner in the writ petition. His one of the prayer is that he should be added as party respondent to the petition. There are other prayers in the application. On careful perusal of the title cause of the writ petition, it appears that the present applicant is no way concerned with the said writ petition. Therefore, civil application is misconceived and is required to be rejected at the threshold. Hence, civil application is rejected. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) Date:09.10.2009. rlj/