CRLMB5805/2010 // 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.5805/2010 Mahendra Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor Date of Order ::: 23.06.2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq, VJ. Shri Govind Choudhary, Counsel for petitioner Shri Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material made available to me during the arguments of the case. Contention of learned counsel for petitioner is that the offence under Section 307 IPC has wrongly been added because no injury has been sustained by any of the injured or any person from the side of the complainant by firearm. The offence under Section 392 IPC has wrongly been added for snatching. The petitioner is in jail since 24.02.2009. Trial of the case is likely to take a long as so far only three witnesses have been examined. There is no previous case ever registered against the petitioner. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on its merits and demerits, I deem it just and proper to release the accused-petitioner, namely, Mahendra Singh Son of Shri Bhopal Singh on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C., in FIR No.62/2009, Police Station Taleda, District Bundi, under Sections 392, 307 and 34 IPC and 3/25 of the Arms CRLMB5805/2010 // 2 // Act, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sureties of Rs.15000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court for his appearance on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The bail application stands disposed of. (Mohammad Rafiq) VJ. //Jaiman//