IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.24789 of 2009 GULLI RAI son of late Raffu Rai, Resident of village- Chakbara, Police Station- Pipra, District- East Champaran at Motihari ….Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, 2. Ramswaroop Rai son of Late Anandi Rai, 3. Ajay Rai, son of Ramswaroop Rai, 4. Buta Rai, son of Late Anandi Rai, 5. Bachu Rai, son of Buta Rai, all resident of village- Chakbara, Police Station- Pipra, District- East Champaran at Motihari …Opposite Parties ----------- 2/ 05.10.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioner, who is the informant, is aggrieved by the order dated 18.5.2009 passed by the 7th Additional Sessions Judge, East Champaran at Motihari, in Sessions Trial No.236 of 2009, by which the opposite party no.2 to 5 have been discharged under section 307 Indian Penal Code. The contention of the petitioners is that the opposite party nos.2 to 5 have been discharged on erroneous grounds. Considering that charge even later on can be altered, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The application is disposed of with observation that in case there is evidence requiring alteration of charge, the same shall be considered by the trial court at an appropriate stage. The application stands disposed of. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)