THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 8768 OF 2000 DATED: 16-08-2005 Between 1. Korada China Maraiah, S/o late Seetaiah, Hindu Aged about 80 years, Grama Sevak, R/o Jammu Narayanapuram (V), Vizianagaram District and others. …………… PETITIONERS And Mandal Revenue Officer, Jammu Narayanapuram Village, Vizianagaram Mandal & District and others. ……………… RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 8768 OF 2000 ORDER: The petitioners are stated to have preferred an appeal against the impugned proceedings dated 23-04-2000 before the Joint Collector along with an application seeking stay of operation of the impugned proceedings. The Joint Collector did not pass any interlocutory order as prayed for by the petitioners. It is under those circumstances, the petitioners had chosen to file the present writ petition challenging the order which the subject matter of the appeal preferred by them before the Joint Collector. This Court while directing rule nisi to be issued passed interim direction to the respondent – Mandal Revenue Officer not to remove the trees from the land in Sy.No. 35 in an extent of 25 cents of Jammunarayanarapuram Village pursuant to the auction that may be conducted, for a period of eight weeks or till the revision filed by the petitioners before the Government is disposed of, whichever is earlier. In the meanwhile, liberty was given to the petitioners to move the Government and obtain appropriate orders. Thus, it is clear that the petitioners had the benefit of the interim order only for eight weeks or till the revision filed by the petitioners before the Government is disposed of. It is not known now as to whether the appeal preferred by the petitioners has been disposed of. Viewed from any angle, this writ petition does not survive requiring any further adjudication, except to extend the benefit of the interim order granted by this Court till the disposal of the appeal if the same is not yet disposed of by the appellate authority. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of without any order as to costs. (B. Sudershan Reddy, J) 16..08..2005 ks