IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** Criminal Misc. No.52091-M of 2007 Date of Decision:04.02.2008 Murti Kaur .....Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present:- Mr. B.S.Dhaliwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anter Singh Brar, DAG, Punjab. **** RAJESH BINDAL, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on the one hand, the allegations against the petitioner are that she had not deposited the entire amount received on account of auction of the land of the Panchayat whereas on the other hand it is also admitted in the complaint that amount spent on the welfare activities in the village was more than the amount granted by the Government. The submission is that in fact no amount was embezzled by her. The entire amount was spent on the welfare activities in the village. He further submits that in case any amount is found to be due from the petitioner which was not spent on the welfare activities, she will deposit the same. Be that as it may. Without commenting on the merits of the controversy, the interim bail granted to the petitioner on 23.11.2007 is made absolute. The petition is disposed of. February 04, 2008 ( RAJESH BINDAL ) renu JUDGE