1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5294 OF 1998 [Maulana Abdul Majeed Madvi Vs. The State of Mah.and others] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri.R.J.Godbole,Advocate for Petitioner. Shri.V.D.Rakh,A.G.P.for Resp.No.1 to 3. Shri.V.G.Sakolkar,Advocate for Resp. No.4 to 6. .... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 26th OCTOBER,2010. PER COURT : 1. Mr. Godbole, learned counsel appearing for petitioner and Mr. Sakolkar, learned Counsel appearing for respondent have presented terms of compromise reached between the Management and the original petitioner Maulana Abdul Majeed Navdi. 2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders 2. The learned Counsel submit that the parties in person are present in the Court, they have signed the Compromise Memo. The learned Counsel for the respective parties also signed Compromise Memo. The parties have signed on each page of the Compromise Terms, from Page No. 1 to 6. The Terms of compromise is verified by the concerned parties. The Terms of Compromise is taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification. 3. The learned A.G.P. Shri Rakh submits that he has received the copy of Compromise Term. He submits that in case proposal is forwarded by the Management in respect of approval of the petitioner, the Education Officer would pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. 3 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders 4. Clause 4 of the Memo of Settlement reads: 4. The petitioner agreed that he shall not claim any amount towards the arrears of salary, pay and allwances from the Respondent No.4 to 6 Management, fro 18.12.1998 till his reinstatement in service i.e. 1st November 2010. The petitioner relinquished his claim of back wages against all respondents.” 5. The Writ Petition is disposed of as parties have reached compromise. Sd/- Sd/- [K.K. TATED, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.] MTK