IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9469 of 2011 DHANANJAY PANDEY SON OF LATE BRIJNANDAN PANDEY. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 11.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Balthar P.S. Case No. 12 of 2008 pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran registered under Sections 363, 366A and 376 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of enticing away the minor daughter of the informant by the petitioner and one other person. It appears that in 164 Cr.P.C. statement, the victim has supported the accusation including the forceful physical relationship. The medical examination of the victim girl falsifies the statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. It further appears that the informant has subsequently, retracted from her initial version. Considering the fact that other accused 2 persons have been granted regular bail by this Court, I see no reason for the learned court below not to give the same privilege to the petitioner. Let the learned court below pass appropriate order with regard to regular bail of the petitioner preferably on the same day keeping in view the order passed in Cr. Misc. No.45765 of 2008 (Annexure-4). With the above observation, this application is, accordingly, disposed off. Let the order be transmitted through fax at the cost of the petitioner. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)