..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3178 OF 2008 Babulal Hiralal Rao and 3 Ors. ..Applicants. Vs. Ramesh Dashrath Kamble and Ors. ..Respondents. ... Mr.N.K.Singh, Adv. i/b. M/s. M.P.Vashi & Asso. for the applicants. Mr.R.D.Suryawanshi, Adv. for orig.complainant. Ms.A.A.Mane, APP, for the State. ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : 22nd October, 2008 DATE : 22nd October, 2008 DATE : 22nd October, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the applicants, the learned Advocate for the complainant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking quashing of RCC No.967 of 2005 pending before the Jt.JMFC at Ulhasnagar, Thane. It is seen that in the said case process has been issued against the applicants. under Sections 452, 504, 506, 427, 323 r/w. 34 of IPC. ..(2).. 3. It is seen that the stage of the case is that only process has been issued against the applicants. It is clear that if the process is quashed, the entire proceeding in respect of the applicants would come to an end. 4. For the reasons recorded in the order passed by this Court in the case of V.K.Jain Vs. P.V.Padode; V.K.Jain Vs. P.V.Padode; V.K.Jain Vs. P.V.Padode; 2005(3) Mh.L.J.778, 2005(3) Mh.L.J.778, 2005(3) Mh.L.J.778, which has been upheld by the Hon’ble Apex Court I am of the opinion that the applicants have an efficacious remedy of preferring revision against the order of Magistrate issuing process. Hence, in my view, it would be appropriate that the applicants prefer a revision before the concerned Sessions Court against the order of the Magistrate issuing process. 5. Liberty is granted to the applicants to prefer the necessary revision before the concerned Sessions Court. The learned Advocate for the applicants makes a statement that the necessary revision will be preferred within five weeks from today. In view of this statement, the trial Court shall not proceed with the trial for a period of ..(3).. five weeks. 6. If the revision is preferred within five weeks, delay, if any, in preferring the revision be condoned. On the necessary revision being preferred by the applicants before the concerned Sessions Court, the concerned Sessions Court shall dispose of the matter on merits after hearing necessary parties. 7. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]