1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5 OF 2009 Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technical University Project Affected and Local Grievance Committee ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. R.K. Bobade for the Petitioner Mr. C.R. Sonawane, Assistant Government Pleader, for Respondents No. 1 and 2 Mr. A.K. Jalisatgi for Respondent No. 3. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE: APRIL 8, 2009 P.C.:- The petitioner was aggrieved of advertisement / notice dated 30th May, 2008, by which certain posts were advertised, without showing any reservation for the Project Affected Persons. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it was against the judgment in Writ Petition No. 7472 of 2007. 2. Counter-affidavit has been filed, in which it is stated that in pursuance of the advertisement, posts to Class 3 have already been filled up. No posts could be filled up in Class 4, as there was a ban imposed by the State Government. It is stated in the affidavit that the 2 Project Affected People were entitled to be appointed to the extent of 5% of the total posts; and in Class 'C', the proportion against which they had been appointed prior to issue of advertisement was 10.5%. 3. In this view of the matter, we do not think that any further reservation was required to be made. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has, however, drawn our attention to a letter annexed with the counter-affidavit by the respondents issued by respondent No. 3, in which it is stated that one post in Class 'C' could be filled up from the Project Affected Persons. But the learned Assistant Government Pleader clarified that this was a mistake, which has been clarified in the counter-affidavit, as the calculations had been made wrongly, and on the basis of those calculations, this letter had been issued. 5. For these reasons, we do not find merit in the petition, which is accordingly dismissed. BILAL NAZKI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.