1 WP 4914/2011 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4914 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. V.R. Tripathi i/b V.R. Tripathi & Associates for the petitioner. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATE : 26TH JULY 2011 P.C. : 1. The respondent no.1 is the original plaintiff and the respondent no.2 is the original defendant. In the suit, the respondent no.1 took out a motion against the respondent no.2 for an injunction restraining him from disposing of the suit property. According to the respondent no.1, during the pendency of the suit and 2 WP 4914/2011 before hearing of the notice of motion, the respondent no.2 transferred the suit property in favour of the petitioner and the respondent no.3. The respondent no.1 therefore took out Chamber Summons No. 634 of 2010 for impleading the petitioner and the respondent no.3 as parties to the suit. By an order dated 28th March 2011, the Court allowed the chamber summons. That order is impugned in the present petition. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has nothing to do with the suit property and he has been unnecessarily dragged in the litigation. The respondent no.1 has made a specific allegation that the respondent no.1 (original defendant) has transferred the suit property to the petitioner and the respondent no.3. If so, the trial Court committed no error in joining them as 3 WP 4914/2011 parties to the suit. If it is ultimately proved at trial that the petitioner is not a transferee from the respondent no.2, the suit against him can be dismissed with costs and he can also pray for compensatory costs. There is no reason for interfering in the order joining him as a party to the suit. Writ petition is rejected summarily. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)