IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 30TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 8TH ASWINA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 1368 of 2008(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.16332/2008 Dated 02/07/2008 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER: --------------- RIJU MUKUNDAN, S/O. MUKUNDAN, THEVARATHOPPU VEEDU, TB JUNCTION, ATTINGAL. BY ADV. SRI.R.ANILKUMAR RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT: ----------------------------------- SUDHEER RAJ, SECRETARY, AGED 45, ATTINGAL MUNICIPALITY, ATTINGAL.P.O. SRI.M.R.ANANDAKUTTAN, STANDING COUNSEL FOR MUNICIPALITY. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------------- Cont. Case(C) 1368 of 2008 -------------------------------------------------------- Dated: SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 JUDGMENT Alleging disobedience of the judgment in WP(c). No.16332/2008, this contempt is filed. 2. The main grievance of the writ petitioner is that irrespective of the judgment, the 3rd respondent continues his occupation of the tenanted premises and that the Municipality is not taking action. 3. A reading of the judgment shows that all that has been submitted by the Municipality and recorded in the judgment is regarding their decision not to grant licence. The judgment does not oblige the Municipality to take any further action. If that be so, the petitioner cannot allege disobedience of the judgment on the part of the Municipality by virtue of the continuance of the 3rd respondent in the tenanted premises. The contempt petition is dismissed. mt/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE WP(C) 2 mt/-