IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12375 of 2011 MD. MOKIM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 29.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Admittedly, Jamalpur P.S. Case No. 131 of 2010 has been registered on the basis of complaint petition filed by the informant, who happens to be Manager of Central Bank of India, Branch-Jamalpur. It is stated that petitioner took loan from the above stated bank and when his business premises was inspected by the bank officials no machine was found in his business premises. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the informant, being branch manager of the concerned bank, was demanding commission from the petitioner and when the petitioner refused to oblige him, he lodged the instant case. It is also pointed out by him that the petitioner has also filed a complaint case against the bank officials including the informant of the present case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in 2 connection with Jamalpur P.S. Case No. 131 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )