IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46465 of 2009 SATENDRA PRASAD @ RAHUL @ DADAN @ NARESH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 13/01/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 332, 302, 379, 380, 435, 436, 427, 353 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report wherein 100 unknown persons were said to have committed the occurrence and his name transpired during investigation, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 4.8.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Nokha (Baghaila) P.S. Case No. 93 of 2007 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. Since the petitioner belongs to Jharkhand State, the sureties must be local. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature 2 after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. The petitioner appears to be implicated in other cases of similar nature. So, it is desirable that the petitioner be directed to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Rohtas within two weeks of his release along with a copy of this order and every fortnight thereafter, for the next nine months, in which period the S.P. Rohtas is requested to keep watch on the petitioner’s conduct and in case it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned who will then initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)