IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 2ND JULY 2009 / 11TH ASHADHA 1931 RP.No. 352 of 2009(S) ------------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.31000/2008 dated 8.1.2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC ------------------------------------------------------------- UDYOGAMANDAL SASI, I.M.DANCE ACADEMY, REG.NO.797/81, T.C.27/525 (2), VANCHIYOOR P.O., THAMBURANMUKKU, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SMT.V.P.SEEMANDINI (SR.), SMT.S.KARTHIKA SRI.M.S.UNNIKRISHNAN SMT.KAVYA P.PRASAD RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/ADDL.RESPONDENTS 5 TO 7 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF CULTURE, SASTHRI BHAVAN, RAJENDRAPRASAD ROAD, SASTHRI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY., DEPARTMENT OF CULTURAL AFFAIRS, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 3. KENDRA SANGEETHA NATAKA ACADEMY, RAVEENDRA BHAVAN, FIROSSHA ROAD, NEW DELHI - 110 001. 4. KERALA SANGEETHA NATAKA ACADEMY, THRISSUR. 5. S.SRINIVASAN, I.A.S., (RETD), SECRETARY, MARGI, NEAR FORT HIGH SCHOOL, FORT P.O.. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 23. 6. E.GIRIJA SANKAR, SECRETARY, SANDARSAN KATHAKALI VIDYALAYAM, SOUTHERN SIDE, AMBALAPUZHA EAST.P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. R.P.NO.352 OF 2009 - 2 - 7. SOORYA STAGE AND FILM SOCIETY, CHAITHANYA, NEAR GOVT.GUEST HOUSE, THYCAUD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, N.KRISHNAMOORTHY @ SOORYA KRISHNAMOORTHY R1 BY ASST. SOLICITOR GENERAL SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kurian Joseph & P.R.Ramachandra Menon, JJ. ------------------------------------------ R.P.No.352 of 2009 ------------------------------------------ Dated, this the 2nd day of July, 2009 ORDER Kurian Joseph, J. This is a petition for review of the judgment at the instance of the writ petitioner. The writ petition was filed in public interest mainly for a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to frame guidelines regarding the organisation and functioning of the cultural institutions receiving financial assistance from the Central and State Governments. There were other prayers as well for appointment of a Commission for appropriate enquiry. The petitioner had named a few institutions at paragraph 22 of the writ petition, who according to the petitioner, have not spent the assistance obtained by them in the proper manner. There are serious allegations in that regard. A Division Bench of this Court dismissed the writ petition on the ground that those institutions are not made parties to the writ petition and on that count it was R.P.No.352 of 2009 - 2 - observed that it is not a public interest litigation. 2. Having heard learned senior counsel appearing for the review petitioner, we find that the defect pointed out in the judgment cannot be cured by the review petition. Therefore, it will be sufficient if it is clarified that the judgment sought to be reviewed will not stand in the way of the petitioner filing a proper writ petition after impleading all the necessary parties against whom allegations are raised in the writ petition and impleading such other organisations in a representative capacity. Review petition is disposed of as above. Kurian Joseph, Judge P.R.Ramachandra Menon Judge vns