IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 260 of 1985 Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- MULSHANKAR M SHUKLA Versus PRABHASHANKAR N JANI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR JV DESAI for Petitioner MR BHUPENDRA SHELAT for Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT Date of decision: 28/04/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT Learned counsel for the petitioner states that quite some time back he was instructed by the son of the original petitioner that the original petitioner has expired about four or five months ago. Learned counsel then sates that the said son was informed that the heirs of the deceased petitioner would be required to be brought on record. Learned counsel then states that he has received no further instruction in the matter and therefore the matter may be dismissed for want of prosecution. Accordingly this revision is dismissed for want of prosecution. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. **********