^ ^ @g»ng^, s'^^^l^ : ^^^.i^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S| N0.<?// 72007 PETITIONER .-•^^ ^^ ,4yr c;'^'' f ^ ^Shameshwar Singh Thakur S/o Late B.S. Thakur aged about 40 years, Lecturer. Govemment Hieher Secondary School, Caxap-1, BhQai, District, Durg (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director, Public Instructions, Pension Bada, Raipur (C.G.) District Education officer, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITCTION OF INDIA '2 9 DEC 20! XI-HC-78 g^^TpiRpr, riTflyis, Rfiiitiy OS.p.CS^ M°. a-°3/°7 c$ Dt^dT sh*<l<h TPT 200 W^t 4dW (lic<t3s"i8T) sn^r^TR-ii*' (raTsn^Taiiiw SRtTWBfScrsn^T wrfypfrTim?fffffe^ rfSfFZR ^iSTf^iTan^r 18.01.2007 <^, Babhi '<. <Ar. Anupam Dubey and Mr. R|S. Patel, counsel for the petitioner(3). Mr. Arvind Oubey, Ponel LtMc|rer for the State/respondents. With the consent of learn^d counsel appeoring for ttie pwties, the writ petition is heard fi^ialty and disposed of. Common order dictated in Wr|it Petition (5) No. 209/2007 in open Cburt-, passed separately. A copy of thfe order be (^laced on the record of the connected writ petitions. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge v' fc 'l/ •^ P.T.O. HKH CWKT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SIhteLE BEtsKH : HON-BLE WSt. SATtSH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. Petitioner WRFT PETmON tS.) No.209 OF 2007 Surya Naroyan Tiwnri versus Respondents State of ChhattiS9arh ond others WRTT PETmON (S.) No.211 OF 2<%)7 Petitioner : Shameshwur Singh Thakur versus ResBondents State of Othattisgarh and others Petitioner WRIT rcTCTION (5.) No. 212 OF 2007 Ravindra l&imar Patkar yersus ResDpnctents State of Chhatt'is9arh and others WRIT PETmON t5.) No. 213 OF 2007 Petitsoner ; Smt. Nidhi Owivedi versus Reqiondents State of Chhatt'isgarh <md others WRTT PETTHON fS.l ^4o.248 CT 2007 Petitionars : Qwndrodiekhar Patel and others versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and others Present : Mr. Anupam Dubey, counsel and AAr. R.S. Patel, counsel for the petitioner(s). Mr. Arvind Dubey, Pons\ Lawyer for the State/respondents. Oft&ER yossed on tiiis 18th Doy of Januaa-y, 2007) Learned counsel appeau'ing for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly aibmit that the focts and question of low involved in •the present writ petitions are squarely covered by -the decision of this Court in -the case of Yashmint KIMIW Shwvidwaj ws. Mwueifwl Corpavtlon, t>wy and eawthei^. 2. For the aforementioned reasons, the^ writ petitions are disposed of in +erms of -the decision of this Court in the matter of yastiwvit ^umar BharadwaJ (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether -the petitioners have acquired B.EdVB.TJ. Certtfi<ates at their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further wAiether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on the record of the connected -.wit petitions. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge 1 2006CII)MPJR-C©96 Bobh)