1 WP No.4028/11 mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4028 of 2011 Rajaram Maruti Buchde and ors. ... Petitioners versus Kantabai Bhimaji Jambhulkar and ors. ... Respondents ... Mr.P.B. Shah for the petitioners CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 13th June 2011 P.C. 1. This petition is directed against an interlocutory order and calls for no interference on that ground alone. 2. Even otherwise, I am satisfied that this is not a fit case for interference in exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 3. The petitioners defendants applied for amendment of the written statement. By the amendment, petitioners wanted to plead that respondents plaintiffs had made certain alterations in the court record to show that they were senior citizens, more than 60 years old, so as to obtain an order for expeditious hearing of the suit. The 2 WP No.4028/11 trial court while rejecting the application has held that this allegation needs no amendment as the petitioners can always show to the court that any unauthorized alterations were been made in the court record and no pleadings were necessary for this purpose. In view of this specific order, which permits the petitioners to adduce evidence regarding the alleged unauthorized alterations, in my view, no interference in the impugned order disallowing the amendment is called for. Writ Petition is accordingly rejected summarily. (D.G.KARNIK, J)