HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.5160 of 2009 O R D E R: Both the Courts below consistently and concurrently held that the 2nd respondent is wife of the petitioner and awarded maintenance to her. The said finding of marriage between the parties is based on evidence of the claimant as PW.1 and her sister-in-law as PW.2 and also Ex.P.1 wedding card relating to the petitioner’s son and Ex.P.2 voters list. It is contended by the petitioner’s counsel that both the Courts below did not consider the question as to why the 2nd respondent did not come forward for the last 30 years making a claim against the petitioner. The Courts below were satisfied with the oral and documentary evidence let in by the 2nd respondent. Since no second revision is maintainable against revisional order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, the petitioner approached this Court with this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. This Court cannot undertake appreciation of evidence in this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. There are no valid or legal grounds to interfere with the order passed by the revisional Court. Hence, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. _______________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU,J Dt.22nd December, 2011 PNV