IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30410 of 2010 BAGESHWARI PRASAD SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THRU. VIG. ----------- 4 07.10.2010. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in a case under sections 420,468,469/201 of the I.P.C. and section 5(2) read with section 5(1) (d) of the P.C.Act, 1988 of the P.C. Act corresponding to section 13(2) read with 13(1)d of the P.C.Act, 1988. The petitioner submits that for the work executed in 1983, the instant vigilance case was registered in the year 1992 alleging that the work executed by him in the year 1983 was found to be substandard in 1992. He further submits that had the verification been done immediately after completion of work, the same would not have been found to be sub standard. Other accused have already been allowed anticipatory bail. Vigilance counsel submits that petitioner belatedly moved this court for anticipatory bail which was even refused by the Apex court. He further submits that petitioner despite several requests of IO, did not appear before him in furtherance of investigation. Petitioner is in custody since 29.7.2010. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner as above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Special judge, Vigilance II, Patna in 2 Special case no. 25(A)/92, Vigilance Police Station Case No. 48 of 1992. Petitioner would not absent physically for more than two consecutive dates at a stretch, till three witnesses are examined in trial, otherwise his bail bond would be cancelled and he would be taken into custody. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)