IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID MONDAY, THE 26TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 4TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 25564 of 2011(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- MADHUKUMAR.R, S/O.LATE R.RAJAPPAN PILLAI, AISWARYA, MELATTUR P.O., MALAPPURAM (DIST) - 679 326 BY ADV. MR.M.PREMKUMAR RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA - 695 001. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, TELECOMUNICATION HEAD QUARTERS, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA - 695 004. 3. STATE OF KERALA - REP BY ITS HOME SECRETARY, SECRETARIATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 4. PRAMOD KUMAR, DRIVER PC-1520, RESERVED RAPID RESPONSE AND RESCUE FORCE UNIT, PANDIKKAD - 676 521. GOVERNMENT PLEADER MS.SMITHA BABU. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 25564 of 2011(U) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: TRANSFER ORDER DGO NO.835/2011 DTD. 16.7.2011. EXT.P2: REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BEFORE R1 DTD. 20.9.2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL ..... // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE. HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No.25564 Of 2011 ---------------------- Dated this the 26th day of September, 2011. J U D G M E N T Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for respondents 1 to 3. 2. The writ petition is filed seeking a direction commanding the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue in the present station for a period of one year, to consider Ext.P2 representation and pass orders within a time limited to be fixed by this Court and for other incidental reliefs. 3. When the matter was taken up for consideration today in the admission list, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a direction may be issued to the 1st respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P2 representation within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 4. In view of the limited prayer, this Court is of the view that the writ petition can be disposed of without issuing notice to the 4th respondent. ::2:: W.P.(C).No.25564 Of 2011 5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 representation within a period of two weeks from today, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, 4th respondent and other affected parties, if any. As an interim measure, there will be a further direction to respondents 1 to 3 to permit the petitioner to continue in the present station till the disposal of Ext.P2 representation, if not already relieved. The writ petition is disposed of as above. HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge. bkn/-