:1: :1: :1: srp. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2128 OF 2004. WRIT PETITION NO. 2128 OF 2004. WRIT PETITION NO. 2128 OF 2004. Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi. ..Petitioner. Versus. The Security Guards Board for Gr. Bombay & Thane District & Others. ..Respondents. --- Ms. Rajana Todankar i/b Mr. Susheel Mahadeshwar for the petitioners. Ms. Lata Desai for the respondent no.1. CORAM: S. B. MHASE & CORAM: S. B. MHASE & CORAM: S. B. MHASE & S. R. SATHE,JJ. S. R. SATHE,JJ. S. R. SATHE,JJ. DATE: JULY 2, 2007. DATE: JULY 2, 2007. DATE: JULY 2, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The grievance of the petitioner can be redressed if they make an application to the Board. The Board should consider those application on merits. Learned counsel Smt. Lata Desai for the respondent no.1 - Board states that the application if made can be considered on its own merits. We, therefore, direct the petitioner to make an application before the Board within a period of two weeks from today, and within eight weeks thereafter the Board shall decide the same on its own merits finding out as to whether the petitioner is physically fit for security guard. Petition is accordingly disposed of. (S.R.SATHE,J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (S.R.SATHE,J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (S.R.SATHE,J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.)