CWP-T No. 3058 of 2008 01.01.2010 Present:- Mr. C.N.Singh, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. A.K.Bansal, Addl. A.G. with Mr.R.P.Singh, Asstt. A.G. for the respondents. On the oral request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Engineer-in-Chief, HPPWD, U.S.Club, Shimla is impleaded as respondent No.4. The necessary correction be carried out in the memo of parties. The learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the petitioner had made earlier representations to various authorities for payment of wages of Junior Engineer to petitioner but those representations of the petitioner were not decided. The learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer only to the extent to give time bound directions to respondent No.4 to decide the representation of petitioner which he will be making to respondent No.4 as per directions of this Court. The prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner has not been opposed by the other side. Let the petitioner make a representation to respondent No.4 in two weeks regarding his grievance for the payment of wages of Junior Engineer for the period he allegedly worked as Junior Engineer with respondents. If such representation is made by petitioner, the respondent No.4 shall decide the representation within a period of further six weeks by speaking order from the date of receipt of representation. In case the decision goes against the petitioner, the petitioner shall be at liberty to approach the appropriate Court against such decision. The petition stands disposed of. January 1, 2010. ( Kuldip Singh ) (GR) Judge.