^. s HQN*BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P.S. NQ, ^4| OF 2011 PETITIONER Mitbilesh Kumar Nirmalk'ar S/ o Shri Ghisal Prasad Nirmalkar , aged about-42 years, R/o yillage- Tenganmada, Janpad Panchayat-Kota, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^•_ ' 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Panchayat and Social Welfaj-e Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur ^(C.G.). . 2. Collector, Bilaspur Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.). i 3f Janpad Pajachyat Kota, through Chief Executive Officer, Kota, | Tahsil-Kota, Distt. Bilaspur(C.G.). . . WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTZON OF INDIA L-l— ?^ "1 HjGHCOURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BILASPUR (Hon. IVIr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker) W.P.(S)No. 5641 of 2011 Mithilesh Kumar Nirmalkar VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh and others Petitioner Respondents Present: Shri Manoj K. Sinha, counsel for the petitioner. Shri N. Naha Roy, P.L for the State/respondents No.1 &2. O^DE^ (22.09.2011) Grievance of the petitioner is that pursuant to the order dated 01.09.2010 passed by this Court in VV.P. No. 1398/2000. the petitioner has filed a representation before respondent No.1 on 21.10.2010 Annexure P-2, but ti!! date, the said representation has not been decided. He submits that now almost one year has expired but the respondent No.1 is sitting tight over the matter and is not deciding it. He further submits that a direction may be issued to respondent No.1 for deciding the representation within some time frame. 2. Leamed State counsel has no objection if any such direction is issued to the respondent No.1 for declding the representation. 3. Considering the facts circumstances of the case, in particular the order dated 01.09.2010 passed by this Court in W.P. No1398/2000 and order dated 05.09.2011 passed in Contempt Case No.296/2011, respondent No.1 is directed to decide the representation within two months from the next date of hearing. 4. it would be dufy of the petitioner to apprise respondent No.1 about the passing of this order. 5. Learned State counsel shall atso inform respondent No.1 about the passing ofthis order. -—— 6. The petition is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge ^