IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4948 OF 2009 BETWEEN Revu Satyanarayana. …PETITIONER AND Uppalapu Nagamani and three others. …RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioner: MR. K. SARVA BHOUMA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: MR. V. SUBRAHMANAYAM The Court made the following: - ORDER: Petitioner, who is a third party objector to the attachment, filed a claim petition being E.A.No.151 of 2007 in E.P.No.5 of 2007 in O.S.No.127 of 2000 objecting to the attachment, which was dismissed under the impugned order dated 16.01.2009. Hence, this revision. 2. Under Order 21 Rule 58 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 the rejection of claim petition has a force of a decree and as such, the revision petition is not maintainable, as an appeal is specifically provided under Order 21 Rule 58(4) CPC. The revision being not maintainable is liable to be dismissed. 3. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that appeal lies to this Court only and requests that the certified copy of the impugned order appended to this revision may be permitted to be returned to him to enable him to file an appeal. In view of the above, the office is directed to return the certified copy of the impugned order by substituting it with an attested Xerox copy thereof in the record of CRP. The civil revision petition is accordingly dismissed. As a sequel, interim stay granted by this Court on 15.10.2009 stands vacated and no orders are necessary in the vacate stay petition. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J November 24, 2010 Note: Furnish C.C. of the order by 29.11.2010 (B/o) DSK