IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 7136 of 2008 Between: V. Rama Krishna, S/o. Venkateswara Rao, Velagapudi Village, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Guntur District, Guntur. 2 Mr. V. Venkateswara RAo, S/o. NOt Known, The Sub Inspector of Police, Thullur, Guntur District. 3 L. Laxman Babu, The Assistant Director, Department of Mining Pandaripuram, Guntur, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.J.U.M.V.PRASAD Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.2 in implicating the petitioner’s Tractor bearing No.AP27 T 9730 in a false case without registering any crime and keeping the same under illegal custody, as illegal and arbitrary. Though extensive pleadings are filed on both sides, I find it unnecessary to delve into the same, for the reason that at the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home furnished a copy of a purported challan under which, the petitioner allegedly paid fine amount for the alleged illegal transportation of sand through his tractor. Sri J.U.M.V.Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner pleaded with considerable vehemence that the petitioner’s tractor has neither indulged in illegal transportation of sand nor did he pay any fine amount. In view of the submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home that the police are prepared to release the petitioner’s tractor on his approaching the Sub-Inspector of Police, Thullur Police Station, I refrain from going into the above mentioned controversy, irrespective of whether the petitioner paid the alleged fine amount or not. Since fine amount was stated to have been received by the Mining Department for the alleged illegal transportation of sand and respondent No.2 expressed his readiness to release the tractor to the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2 to release tractor bearing No.AP27 T 9730 to the petitioner immediately on his approaching respondent No.2. If the petitioner has any grievance against the police for the alleged false implication in the criminal case, he is given liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings in law. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP.No.9368 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 15th APRIL, 2008 kvni