coapp7-11.doc 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APPEAL NO.7 OF 2011 IN COMPANY LAW BOARD APPLICATION NO.20 OF 2011 IN COMPANY LAW BOARD PETITION NO.11 OF 2010 ALONGWITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO.6 OF 2011 IN COMPANY APPEAL NO.7 OF 2011 Rajiv Narhari Sardesai & Ors .. Appellants/ Org.Applicant Versus Dynamech Cranes Pvt Ltd & Ors .. Respondents Mr.R.S.Apte i/by Y.M.Pendse for the appellants. Mr.S.Suresh Nayak, respondent No.2, present. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 25th FEBRUARY 2011 P.C. . The order under challenge is interlocutory. I am not impressed by the arguments of Mr.Apte, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant that the Tribunal has in any way coapp7-11.doc 2 abandoned the process of the dispute between the family members being resolved by the procedure prescribed and known to law. It will always be open for the parties to point out to the Tribunal that the procedure evolved should be substituted by a better mode. I do not see how all these requests and the steps to be taken in furtherance thereof would not be considered by the Tribunal. The matter is still pending. In case the final orders in the appeal are adverse to the appellants, then, while impuging them it is open for them to raise appropriate pleas with regard to the directions issued by the Tribunal. With this clarification and keeping open all such pleas, this company appeal is disposed off. 2 In view of disposal of the appeal, company application No.6 of 2011 does not survive and the same is disposed off. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)