THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Contempt Case NO.849 of 2011 ORDER: W.P.No.20302 of 2010 filed by the petitioner was allowed on 14.03.2011 and a direction was issued to the respondent to restore the dealership in petroleum products to the petitioner. Complaining that the respondent has not implemented the directions issued by this Court, the petitioner filed this contempt case. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the respondent filed W.A.No.318 of 2011 against the judgment in the writ petition and a Division Bench of this Court has dismissed the same on 21.07.2011. Left with no alternative, the respondent had issued proceedings, dated 29.07.2011 restoring the dealership to the petitioner. With that, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. Therefore, the contempt case is closed. ` Learned counsel for the respondent submits that his client intends to file a Special Leave Petition before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. It is needless to observe that the restoration of dealership and compliance with the orders in the writ petition shall always be subject to the outcome of the proceedings, which the respondent may institute. There shall be no order as to costs. __________ 04.08.2011 JSU THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Contempt Case No.849 of 2011 Date: 04.08.2011 JSU