IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 28 OF 2006 MR. SRINIVAS V. DEMPO, PANAJI-GOA. ... Appellant Versus MR. SURENDRA V. DEMPO, MUMBAI ... Respondent Mr. Sudin M. S. Usgaonkar, advocate for the appellant. Ms.Sonia Chodankar, advocate for the respondent. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 9th December, 2010 P.C: The learned counsel for the appellant has filed application for withdrawal of the appeal duly signed by the appellant and his advocate. Ms. Chodankar, appears on behalf of the respondent and states that she has no objection if the appeal is allowed to be withdrawn. Ordinarily, I would not have taken up the matter since both the parties are closely related to me. But since the appellant is seeking withdrawal of the appeal for which the respondent has no objection the learned counsel for both the parties submitted that the matter be taken up by this Court.Since the appeal is being withdrawn by the appellant for which the respondent has no objection, the matter is taken up by me. In view of the prayer made for withdrawal of the appeal, the appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn. Mr. Usgaonkar states that interim order was granted in the appeal. Needless, to mention that the interim order stands vacated. A. P. LAVANDE, J. ap/-