IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 10979 of 2008 Between: Budiga Srujana D/o Venkateswarlu being Minor rep by ntural father and guardingVenkateswarlu S/o Sharamanda, aged 48 years Private Service, R/o Nereducherla, nalgonda District. ..... PETITIONER AND A.P. Board of Secondary Education, rep by its Secretary nampally, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writkorder ordirection, and more particularlyone in the nature of Writ of mandamus directing the Respondnet to order for revluation of Petitioners 2nd Language answer Papers with H. T. No. 0873494 of March 2008 and revise the marks obtained by her' and pass such other or further/orders deemed just and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner:MRCHINTALAPUDI SUDHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 10979 OF 2008 ORDER: 1. This writ petition appeared in the list under the caption for admission on 7-7-2008. There was no representation and therefore, it was directed to be listed on this day under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Despite the matter listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, on this day, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It indicates that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing this writ petition. 2. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. _____________________________ Justice B.Seshasayana Reddy 9th July, 2008. KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 10979 OF 2008 9th July, 2008.