CR No. 1307 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No. 1307 of 2011 Date of Decision: 24.02.2011. Kulwant Singh .......Petitioner Vs. Mangal Singh and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr. Sandeep Singh Deol, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... SABINA, J. Plaintiff had filed suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering in his peaceful possession. During the pendency of the suit, defendant No.1 moved an application under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking amendment of written statement. Vide impugned order dated 3.1.2011, the said application was dismissed by the trail court. Hence, the present petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the amendment sought to be incorporated in the written statement by the petitioner was very essential for the just decision of the case. The petitioner wanted to prove on record FIR No. 03 dated 9.1.2008 under Sections 447, 511, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and order passed by the Assistant Collector qua correction of entry in the khasra girdawri. CR No. 1307 of 2011 (O&M) -2- After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the instant petition deserves dismissal. The case is now admittedly listed for rebuttal evidence, if any and arguments. The order vide which the entries in the khasra girdawri have been corrected during the pendency of the suit, is not relevant for the decision of the case as any correction made in the entries in the khasra girdawri during the pendency of the suit cannot be taken into consideration while deciding the suit. The FIR now sought to be placed on record has no bearing on the case as the same has been lodged during the pendency of the suit. Hence, no ground for allowing the amendment of written statement in the present case is made out. Dismissed. (SABINA) JUDGE February 24, 2011 Gurpreet