r it Petition (0 No. 2539 of 2009 1 2. Kumar, S/o. Bhagwat Prasad, Aged about 28 years, R/o. Jarhabhata, Bilaspur (CG) Rachna Deen, W/o. Vineet E. James, Aged about 31 vears, R/o. Ware House Road, Bilaspur (CG) Dinesh Kumar M'lshra, S/'o. Shri Saldau Prasad K'lishra, Aged about 27 years, R/o. Near Forsst Barrier, Uslapur, Biiaspur (CG) Ramesh Kumar Maravi, Sio. Kanhai Ram Maravi, Aged about 27 ye-ai-s, R/o. Near Sharda Gas Agency, Kapii Naaar. Sarkanda, BilasDiir s'CGI Navneet Kumar Sonwani, S/o. Murit Ram Sonwani, Agsd about 27 years, R/o Jarhabhata, Bilaspur, Districf yusspur (C-.^,) Ghi ihanshyam Sahu, S/o. Ramshe.ran Sahu, Aged about 28 years, R'o. Near City Kotwaii, Juna Biiaspur, District Biiaspur (CG) ,ris ;^?3=i.^'^rfft^^. ? En^,?B"^ t3T:=i KcSi'U'Nijfciy | 5 z. Stste of Chhattisgarh, through: Secretary, Health & Family Weffare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) Chhattisgarh Paramedicai Counci!, through: its Director, Paramedical Councii, Raipur (CG) Chhattisgarh Sahachikitskiya Parishad, Chhattisgarh, through: Registrar, Ch'nattisgarh Sahachikitsidya Parishad, Raipur Directorate, Medical Education, Mantralaya Parishad, Old Nurses Hostei Premises, Raipur, frT^\3/ uourss uiTsoiQT, "srsr Certificate Course, Raipur (CG) Chhattisgarh Sahac'nikitskiya Parishad, Raipur Di'strict Raipur (CG) Jackmen h4ernorial Mission Hospital, through: its Director, Jackmen Memoria! Mission Hospital, Biiaspur, District Biiaspur (CG) .P.fC'jNo. 2539 of2009 Sti'iir'i re Mr. Manoi Paranjpe, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondent No. Mr. Rudranath Mukherjee, Advocate for respondent No.4. None for respondents 2, 3 & 5. ^. Heard finally with the consent of The petitioners have filed this writ petition for the followlng relief(3): 1T •-'1 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ'writs, order/orders, direction/directions against the respondent nos. 1 to 5 and they may kindly be directed to. enroll the petitioners on the State Register of Paramedical Practitioners and they may further be directed to grant Permanent Registration Certificate to the petitioners according to section 39 of Chhattisgarh Sahachikitskiya Parishad,Act2001. That, the respondent authorities may kindly be directed to consider the case of the petitioners for grant of registration under Chhattisgarh Sahachikitskiya Parishad Act, 2001. That, the Hon'bie Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records from the possession ofthe respondents. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief(5), which is deemed fit and proper in the aforesaid facts and cireumstances of the case." Thus, the petitioners, in substance, have made prayer for issuance of the dlt'ection to the respondents to enrol! them on the State Register of Paramedical Practitioners and grant of Permanent Registration Certificate to them in accordance with the relevant provisions of !aw. This writ petition was fiied on 12.5.2009 when the registrations of the petifioners were ailegediy refused by t'ne f'espondents. Joint return 'nas been filed on behalf of respondents 2, 3 & 5. Para-2.8 & 2.9 of the return of respondents 2, 3 & 5 reads as follows:- Ta^ -WSSSfK.,.. '^ T^^^^ia.. ^- ^. -'^// W.P.CQNo. 2539 of 2009 "2.8 On 16/6/2009 a meetina of the Paramedical Council was convened and it was resolved that those students who have pursued their studies from (a) the institutions who have got NOC or conditional permission frorn the State Government; or (b) from the institution who has got permission to conduct examination (like University, board, Paramedical Recognized institution, Autonomous Institution, Institution that has got permlssion from the Go-'/t. to conduct examination as prescribed in (a) or otherwise) wou!d be registersd. A copy of the minutes of the meeting dated 16/6/2009 is being annexed herewith as Annexure R 2/4. 2.9 The petitioners were required to apply for registration in view of the resolution but they have not applied tili date. There cases may be considered if they chose to appiy in the prescribed format and deposit the requisite fes." A perusai of the contents of Para-2.8 wouid show that on 16.6.2009 a rneeting of the Paramedicat Council was convened and certain resoiutions wer® passed for registration of the candidates under particular circumstances. These deveiopments have taken place during the pendency of the writ petition. Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that now the petitioners can make fresh applications for their registration according to the resoiutions referred So in Para- 2.8 ofthe return of respondents 2, 3 & 5, which may be directed to be disposed of in accordance with law and in view of the resoiution passed in the meeting on 16.6.2009 and the writ petitionke disposed of accordingly. This prayer is not opposed by counsel for the respondents, Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of with a direction that if so advised, the petitioners may fiie fresh application along with all requisite requirements for thet registration and if such applications are filed, the same shall be disposed of by the concemed authority in accordance wlth !aw particularly in view of the resolution dated 16.6.2009 passed in the meeting oft'ne Paramedicai Council. With the above observations/directions, the vvrit petition is finaily >sed of. Sd7- —- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge