IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 395 of 2010. Surendra Kumar aged about 24 years, S/O Sri Pani Ram R/O Village Gagar, Ward No. 3, Tehsil and Block Pati, District Champawat. … Petitioner. Vs. 1. Prem Ram S/O Sri Nain Ram R/O Village- Gagar, Ward No. 5, Tehsil and Block Pati, District Champawat. 2. Retuirning Officer Gram Dpanchayat, 36 Gagar, Block Pati, District Champawat. 3. District Panchayat Raj Officer, District Champawat. 4. Prescribed Authority/Deputy District Magistrate Pati, District Champawat. 5. District Magistrate/District Election Officer (Panchayat and Local Bodies) Champawat. …Respondents. Mr. M.C.Pande, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. K.P.Upadhyay, learned Additional C.S.C. for respondent nos. 2 to 5. Date April 12, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought the following reliefs:- A. Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari by quashing the order dated 9-3-2010 passed by the respondentno. 4 (Annexure No. 11) by ignoring the direction of the Hon’ble High Court in Writ Petition No. 2151 of 2009 Surendra Kumar Vs. Prem Ram and others on 21-12-2009. B. Issue a suitable writ, order or direction by commanding the District Judge Champawat to decide the stay application of the petitioner pending before it in accordance with law. C. Issue an interim order or direction by restraining the respondents from implementing the order dated 9-3-2010 during the pendency of this writ petition. 2 D. Issue any other writ, order or direction, which in the ends of justice and under the circumstances of the case, the Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper. E. Award the cost of the petition. A perusal of the record shows that the petitioner’s election to the office of Gram Pradhan was set aside by order dated 9- 3-2010 passed by the Prescribed Authority/Up Ziladhikari, Pati. The petitioner has already assailed the said order in revision before the District Judge Champawat in Civil Revision No. 2 of 2010 Surendra Kumar Vs. Prem Ram. According to the petitioner, the interim relief application is also pending before the revisional court, which has been fixed for 23-4-2010. Since the revision as well as stay application are pending before the revisional court, I am not inclined to entertain the writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed in limine. However, the revisional court is directed to decide the interim relief application of the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order and also to decide the revision on merits expeditiously as far as possible. (B.S.Verma,J.) RCP 3