IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12514 of 2010 1. ARCHANA KUMARI D/O KALESHWAR PRASAD RAI, W/O SRI SANTOSH KUMAR R/O VILL SUKHASAN, P.S.SINGHESHWAR, DISTT-MADHEPURA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR , THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE MADHEPURA 4. DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER MADHEPURA 5. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION MADHEPURA 6. SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER MADHEPURA 7. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER SINGHESHWAR , MADHEPURA 8. BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER SINGHESHWAR (WEST),DISTT-MADHEPURA 9. PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, SUKHASAN GRAM PANCHAYAT SINGHESHWAR, DISTT-MADHEPURA 10. MEMBER, DISTRICT PANCHAYAT TEACHERS APPOINTMENT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MADHEPURA ----------- 2 3.9.2010 The petitioner in this case challenges the order dated 9.6.2010, passed by the District Panchayat Teacher Appointment Appellate Tribunal, Madhepura in Appeal no. 52 of 2009 whereby the appellate authority has declared the appointment of all nine Teachers, as being considered there in the said appeal, to be illegal . At the very outset ,learned counsel for the petitioner bring to the notice of this Court that in CWJC No. 10051 of 2010 and analogous cases, as decided by this Court on 16.7.2010, the said order of the tribunal has been set aside. He submits that even the order of the tribunal has been set aside as a whole and not restricted to any individual concerned therewith, 2 still the authorities are desirous of each individual of getting individual order from this Court. I failed to see the reason or the law behind it. The order is set aside as a whole then it inure to the benefits of every person , who was concerned therewith. Individual thereafter need not move the Court. As the order as a whole ceases to exit , in that view of the matter this writ application has been needless filed. However, having been filed, I only have to hold that the grievance being the same, the reason being the same, the order of the tribunal for the reason, as given in CWJC No. 10051 of 2010, cannot be sustained and is set aside. The writ petition is accordingly allowed. singh ( Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)