1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR C.A.Z. NO.385/2011 IN L.P.A. ST. NO.6152/2011 IN W.P. NO. 249/2011 (D) [Onkar s/o Narayanrao Wankhade .vrs. Vidarbha Samaj Kalyan Bahuuddeshiya Education and three others] ................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................................... Shri K.N. Dadhe, Advocate for applicant/appellant, Shri R.M. Bangde, Advocate for respondent nos.1, 2 and 4, Ms. T. Khan, AGP for respondent no.3. .......... CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND P.D. KODE, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 16, 2011. Heard. Petitioner before the learned Single Judge has filed the Letters Patent Appeal and the present Civil Application is for condoning the delay of 20 days in filing it. The learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of non-applicant no.3-Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Amravati, has pointed out that the judgment of the School Tribunal was assailed before the learned Single Judge and the School Tribunal was not joined as party respondent. 2 It is apparent that as per the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Muhammed Enamul Haque .vrs. Muhammad Hussain, 1968 (6) Mh.L.J. NOC Page 1 and full bench judgment of this Court in the case of Ramchandra Dagoji Rangari and others .vrs. Vishwanath Champat Naik and another, 2011 (5) Mh.L.J. 193, the provisions of Article 226 of the Constitution of India were, therefore, not properly invoked. The Letters Patent Appeal, as filed, therefore, is misconceived. With liberty to the applicant/appellant to take steps as are open to him in the law, we dispose of the matter. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE Gulande