IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH FAO No. 424 of 1992 (O&M) Date of decision: 17.1.2011 Ashok Kumar ...Appellant Versus Bimla Devi ..Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Manish Garg, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. A. K. Garg, Advocate for the respondent. ... Rajesh Bindal, J. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that during the pendency of present appeal, the child, whose custody is in dispute has become major. In view of the aforesaid development, the present appeal has been rendered infructuous. Ordered accordingly. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 17.1.2011 mk