IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 29TH OCTOBER 2010 / 7TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 32970 of 2010(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- G.GEVARAJAN, PUNNALA VEEDU, THURUTHIKKARA P.O. KUNNATHUR VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SAJU JOHN RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. KERALA KHADI & VILLAGE INDUSTRIES BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VANCHIYOORP.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. THE PROJECT OFFICER, KERALA KHADI & VILLAGE INDUSTRIES BOARD, KOLLAM - 690521 KOLLAM P.O. SRI.K.P.HARISH, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/10/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 32970 OF 2010 (U) ===================== Dated this the 29th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is a member of Sooranad Grama Vikasana Society. According to the petitioner, the society availed of certain loans from the 1st respondent. Default was committed and by Ext.P11, the 1st respondent has now called upon the parties to make payment of more than Rs.29,47,375. The stand of the 1st respondent is that the petitioner and other members are also personally liable. It is in this context that the petitioner now claims that in respect of his personal liability, he is entitled to get the benefit of Ext.P4 Government Order, by which, the Government have allegedly taken over a portion of the liability of individuals like him. 2. Claiming the benefit of Ext.P4, it is stated that the petitioner along with two others have submitted Ext.P10 representation before the 1st respondent. This representation has not been considered, and therefore, the petitioner seeks a direction for its consideration. 3. I heard the standing counsel appearing for the WPC No. 32970/10 :2 : respondents also. In the nature of the grievance now raised, I feel it is only appropriate that the 1st respondent should consider the representation made. In that view, I direct the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P10, if the same has been received and is pending. Orders on Ext.P10 shall be passed within two weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp