In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh CRM No. M-18685 of 2009 (O&M) Harparkash Singh ..... Petitioner vs State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Mehar Deep Singh, DAG, Punjab. Rajesh Bindal J. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from SI Surinder Kumar, submits that the apprehension of the petitioner that he is being harassed or will be harassed is without any basis. In fact, the petitioner is neither being harassed nor will be harassed in future. In view of this statement, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition qua this claim has been rendered infructuous and the same be dismissed as such. As regards action on the complaint, Annexure P-1, filed by the petitioner is concerned, learned counsel for the petitioner submits he will not press this prayer and he will avail his alternative remedy in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly. 3.8.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge