IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15722 of 2011 SURENDRA SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 02 18.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was granted anticipatory bail vide order dated 07.11.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 24470 of 2007 and granted liberty to furnish the bail bonds within a period of six weeks in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 494 and 498-A of the Indian Penal Code but the petitioner being husband could not furnish the bail bond. Hence the present modification application for modifying of the order dated 07.11.2008 has been filed. This Court is not inclined to modify the order dated 07.11.2008, however since the petitioner was granted bail on merit, I see no reason for the learned court below not to allow the petitioner to be enlarged on regular bail provided he furnishes the bail bond and give undertaking that if the complainant wants to resume conjugal life then he will take her to her matrimonial house. With above observation, the 2 application is disposed off in connection with Complaint Case No. 156 of 2006 pending in the Court of the learned Sub-divisional Magistrate, Bhabua. Let the order be communicated to the learned court below through FAX at the cost of petitioner. Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)