IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.52574-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: OCTOBER 24, 2006 Mamo Devi and another ...PETITIONERS VERSUS State of Haryana ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Partap Singh, Sr.DAG, Haryana. ... The petitioners apprehending their arrest in a non-bailable offence in case FIR No.210 dated 21.7.2006 registered under Sections 323,324,326 and 34 IPC at Police Station Pundri, District Kaithal, have filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail. I have heard the counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the FIR. Counsel for the petitioners contends that no injury has been caused by any of the petitioners which falls under Section 326 IPC. He further contends that in terms of the interim order dated September 7, 2006, the petitioners have joined the investigation. Counsel for the respondent-State does not dispute this fact. In view of the above and for the reasons stated in the interim order dated September 7, 2006, the same is made absolute on the same terms and conditions. This bail order shall remain in operation till the investigation culminates into filing of challan under Section 173 Cr.P.C. except for material change in the circumstances. Thereafter, the petitioners shall be entitled to the grant of regular bail by the trial Court and the same shall further continue till conclusion of the trial on the conditions to be imposed Crl.Misc.No.52574-M of 2006 -2- by the court of competent jurisdiction. Disposed of accordingly. October 24, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE