Cg \a/{V 3%LE $E§6H Q J IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION IS) No.7IZS3' Izolo PETITIONER / Iftikhar Hussain Sabari S/o Late Ahamad Hussain Sabari aged about 33 years R/o Purani Basti Kharsia District -Ra.igarh (C. G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: / 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director Public Instructions Chhatisgarh Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 3. Dstrict Education Officer, District Raigarh (C.G.) /4. Collector, District Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA i mmmafa‘a 1 f ( J $.31: HON’BLE JUSTICE MR PRITINE gQ- 12u2010: Shi‘i Ramakant Pandev coaunse? Shri Ajit Singh, PL. m‘r’the Stat; Grievance 0f the petitianer in tl’ 'ather late Ahmad Hussain Sabari was and he died on 15.1.2002 but till dab given compassionate appointment. Counsel for the petitioner subrm :he petitioner seeking compassionate a} 3/ 5) are pending but ttll date no o submits that ends of justice would be a 3e permitted to Withdraw this petit respondent No.3 to decide his pending r as possible. Counsel for the State submits t fresh representation to the concerned a 3e decided in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petitioner is )etition with liberty to make a fresh rep )f making any such representation by 1 Pf l three weeks’ from the date of recei} :xpected from the authority concerned ’urther period of four months from the c It is made clear that thiSvCourt t ( x $:onsidering all the aspects of the case i permitted to withdraw this resentation. In the eventuality he petitioner with in a period it of copy of this order, it is to decide the same within a .ate of its receipt. )n merits of the case and the’authon'ty ias not expressed any opinion ER DIWAKER for the petitioner. Le present petition is that his working as Assistant Teacher a the petitioner has not been ts that the representations of )pointment (Annexures W3 8r, 'ders have been passed. He ierved if at this stage, he may on with a direction to the epresentation as expeditiously hat iet the petitioner make a uthority and the same would concerned would be at liberty .‘.o decide the representation strictly in accordance with law, i akel‘ . \ ,. sal- Prmnker Di“ Judge