: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW APPLICATION (ST.) NO.21449 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4104 OF 2009 Sunil Chandrakant Salunke .. Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents Mr. Sachin Gite for the Applicant. None for the Respondents. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 9 TH APRIL, 2010. P.C.: 1. The Review Application has been filed as the applicant-petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 28th April, 2009 passed by me in Writ Petition No.4104 of 2009. According to the review applicant, certain documents which would show that the license was renewed on the new address were not available to the applicant-petitioner despite due diligence when the Writ Petition was filed. The applicant- petitioner is, therefore, seeking a review of the earlier order dated 28th April, 2009, passed in the Writ Petition. : 2 : 2. The Review Application is opposed by the learned AGP for the respondents by contending that no details have been mentioned as to why the applicant-petitioner was not able to produce those documents when the Writ Petition was filed. 3. Having heard the submissions of the learned Advocates for the parties and on perusal of the pleadings before me and the documents on which the applicant-petitioner now relies, I am of the view that the earlier order dated 28th April, 2009 passed in the Writ Petition deserves to be recalled. 4. Hence, Review Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 5. Place the Writ Petition before the regular Court.