IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.O.P.C. (T) No. 177 of 2008. Decided on: 22nd October, 2010. Shakti Kapoor. …Petitioner. -Versus- O.P. Sharma. .…Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. O.P. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): The case of the petitioner is that she has not been paid interest @ 9% per annum. However, in the reply, it has been categorically mentioned that the petitioner has been paid interest @ 9% per annum vide draft No. 542933, dated 29.10.2004. 2. In view of this, the present petition is closed. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge October 22, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?