IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 17026 of 2008 Between: Pabbisetty S.V.K.V.Saranya D/o.P.Srinivasa Rao Sri Pabbisetty Srinivasa Rao,Residing at Ongole Prakasam District ..... PETITIONER AND Andhra Pradesh Board of Secondary Education Andhra Pradesh,Hyderabad .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or directing declaring: i.that the Memo dated 5.7.2008 issued by the Respondent stating that there is no change in the marks already recorded in the Hindi paper in favour of the petitioner in her X Class Examination held in March,2008 as arbitrary, illegal, and as unjust ii. direct the respondent to re-value re-examine and recount the answer script of the petitioner in Hindi in the X Class examination held in March,2008 by an independent valuer, and issue a consequential direction directing the respondents to revalue the answer script of the petitioner by an independent valuer after prodcuing the original answer script of the petitioner in the Hindi paper of X class examination held in March 2008 to the court and after comparing the answers given therein withthe key answers and thereafter declare the marks of the petitioner obtained by her in Hindi Paper of X Class examination held in March 2008 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: KUM.C.SINDHU KUMARI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No : 17026 of 2008 O R D E R : None appears for the petitioner. However, in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents, it is stated that pursuant to the interim order dated 26-08- 2008, the unvalued portion of the petitioner’s answer paper was valued and three marks were awarded and the said fact was communicated to the petitioner by proceedings dated 02-09-2008. Hence, nothing survives for adjudication on merits. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J Dated: 23-04-2009 KLP