1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1822/2007. Hiralal Narayan Sontakke ..vs.. State of Maharashtra. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, office Memoranda of Coram Court's or Judge's appearances, Court's orders or directions order and Registrar's order. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= CORAM: C.L.PANGARKAR,J. DATE : 27th July, 2007. 1. Heard Shri Gharde, Advocate for the applicant and Mrs.Rachana Wasnik, learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. This is an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 3. One Manoj Chauhan is working as a watchman at the field of one Shahanawaj Khan. It is alleged that while Manoj was sleeping in the hut in the village, the present applicant/accused along with others entered the house, dragged him out of the house and assaulted him with sword, Gupti etc. Manoj, therefore, lodged a report with the police. The present applicant apprehends arrest. His application has been rejected by the court of Sessions. 2 4. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the present applicant is innocent. He does not live at village Kawatha and he has been implicated only with a view to see that all brothers are behind bar. He also contended that Shahanawaj Khan has in fact cheated entire family and they have filed cases against him and therefore there is false implication. 5. The dispute may be between the present applicant and Shahanawaj Khan. As far as Manoj is concerned, there was no dispute with him. The Certificate of the Medical Officer shows that it is Manoj who had suffered incised wounds which were caused by sharp cutting objects. Manoj has named the present applicant as one of the assailants. Therefore, this is not a fit case where anticipatory bail can be granted. The application is rejected. JUDGE pzc