IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 396 of 2005 (M/B) Sunder Singh Chauhan, S/o Sri Ravi Arjun Singh Chauhan, R/o Satpuli, District Pauri Garhwal. …………. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through Secretary, Industrial Development, Uttaranchal Shasan, Dehradun. 2. District Magistrate, Pauri Garhwal. ………. Respondent Mr. Raman Kumar Shah, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.P. Joshi, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the respondents. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Mr. Raman Kumar Shah, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.P. Joshi, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. Mr. Raman Kumar Shan, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition, now, has become infructuous. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. 4. With the above order, CLMA No. 1774 of 2005 also stands disposed of as infructuous (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 21.06.2006 21.06.2006 G