IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 8092 of 2008 Decided on: 26.11.2010 Chaman Lal …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner : Mr. M.C. Verma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : The case of the petitioner, in a nut-shell, is that though his juniors have been promoted w.e.f. 11.5.2000, however, the case of the petitioner was overlooked. The orders of promotion, whereby the persons junior to the petitioners were promoted, have been withdrawn. Though, as a matter of fact, these persons have obtained interim order by filing a separate Original Application. However, the case of the petitioner, as far as the main relief against the promotion of junior persons is concerned, is over. 2. Mr. M.C.Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner has strenuously argued that his client has not been granted benefit of the tenure service followed by regularization. This question is no more res-integra in view of the judgment rendered by this Court in Uma 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No -2- Dutt Sharma versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another, Latest HLJ 2009 (HP) 1268. 3. Consequently, there shall be a direction to the respondents to grant the benefit of tenure service followed by regularization to the petitioner, within a period of two months after production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. 4. With these observations/directions, the present petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge November 26, 2010 (K. Attri)