IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 12566 of 2009 Between: Raasi Electronics and Electrical Co., Rep. by its ManagingPartner Sri K. Hanumantha Rao, S/o. Late Venkaiah, Aged about 52 Years, Occ: Business, O/o. Plot No. 92, Street No. 10, HMT Nagar, Nacharam, Hyderabad - 76. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Joint Collector-II, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Governmetn of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Special Grade Deputy Collector &Revenue Divisional Officer-East Division, Ranga Reddy District, Office at Goshamahal, Hyderabad. 3 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Tahsildar, Ghatkesar, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 4 Lambada @ Gogulothu Somali, D/o. Late Ganiga, R/o. Annojiguda Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 5 Lambada @ Gogulothu Ramani, W/o. Late Ganiga, R/o. Annojiguda Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 6 Lambada @ Gogulothu Hamsi Bai @ Anusuya W/o. Late Ganiga, R/o. Annojiguda Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 7 Lambada @ Gogulothu Kamili, W/o. Late Amarsingh @ Amru, R/o. Annojiguda Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 8 Lambada @ Gogulothu Savithri, D/o. Late Amarsingh @ Amru, R/o. Annojiguda Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 9 Lambada @ Gogulothu Prameela, D/o. Late Amarsingh @ Amru, R/o. Annojiguda Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 10 Lambada @ Gogulothu Puran, W/o. Late Jagan, R/o. Annojiguda Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of "Writ of Certiorari" to quash the impugned notice No. B/1632/2008, dt. 23-05-2009 issued by the 3rd respondent as illegal and arbitrary perverse and without jurisdiction, and error apparent on the facce of record, and also vioaltive of the Principles of natural Justice in the interest ofjustice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.UNNAM.MURALIDHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not wish to pursue the writ petition as he would like to lodge objections before the 3rd respondent in response to the notice dt. 23.5.2009 issued by the 3rd respondent. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting the liberty as sought. No order as to costs. ___________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J 26.6.2009. KRB. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION No. 12566 of 2009 Dated: 26.6.2009.