1 crr189-11.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COURT RECEIVER’S REPORT NO.189 OF 2011 IN SUIT NO.3262 OF 2003 Smt.Sushma P. Kunekar .. Plaintiff versus Kashinath J. Patil & Ors .. Respondents Mr.Vinay Bhate i/by Haresh Mehta & Co for the plaintiff. Mr.K.R.Tiwari for defendant Nos.1 to 7. Defendant Nos.2 and 3 present. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 28th September 2011. P.C.: . It is stated by the plaintiff’s advocate that the plaintiff desires to engage her own lawyer and not any advocate from the panel of the Court Receiver for initiating as well as proceeding with the eviction matter in the Court of Small Causes at Bandra, Bombay. In the light of this, the Court Receiver shall permit the plaintiff to engage such an advocate and render all assistance to him as and when called for. It is stated on behalf of the occupants whose names and details are mentioned in para 9 of the report, that they would execute the Agency 2 crr189-11.doc Agreement with the Court Receiver in respect of rooms in their possession within a period of one week from today. If they do so, the Court Receiver shall permit them to continue in possession until further orders of this Court. Upon their failure to do so, the Court Receiver is at liberty to seek directions for their forcible eviction. Report is disposed off. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)