IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWPs(T) No. 1942, 1943, 1944 and 1945 of 2008. Decided on: 4th March, 2011. 1. CWP (T) No. 1942 of 2008. Bhav Dev. Vs. State of H.P. and another. 2. CWP (T) No. 1943 of 2008. Tek Chand. vs. State of H.P. & others . 3. CWP (T) No. 1944 of 2008. Tara Pati. vs. State of H.P. & others . 4. CWP (T) No. 1945 of 2008. Kamal Singh. vs. State of H.P. & others . Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim benefit of judgments of this court rendered in Mool Raj Upadhayaya Vs. State of H.P., 1994 Supp. (2) SCC 316. It is for the petitioner concerned to bring the same to the notice of the first respondent, in which case the first respondent will get an opportunity to look into the facts of each case and take appropriate action thereon. Therefore, these writ petitions are disposed of as follows. 2 2. In the event of the individual petitioner filing an appropriate representation, the facts will be verified and appropriate action in the light of the judgment, referred to above, will be taken by the first respondent within another four months. 3. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 4th March, 2011. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (tr) Judge. 3 4