: 1 : Dixit IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.69 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.69 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.69 OF 2008 IN IN IN SECOND APPEAL NO.661 OF 1998 SECOND APPEAL NO.661 OF 1998 SECOND APPEAL NO.661 OF 1998 Sampat Lakhuji @ Laxman Tidke & Ors. ...Applicants V/s. Ashok Yashwant Gangurde & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Jai Mhaskar, Advocate, h/f. G.S. Godbole, for the Applicants. Mr.Vinod Jadhav, Advocate, h/f. Vijay Patil, for the Respondents. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. DATE : 16TH JANUARY, 2008. DATE : 16TH JANUARY, 2008. DATE : 16TH JANUARY, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate for the applicants and Advocate for the respondents. As one of the parties to the Appeal is stated to be a senior citizen, the hearing of the Appeal deserves to be expedited. However, peremptory date cannot be fixed considering the pendency of the Second Appeals of the year 1999 in this Court. 2. Hence, the Civil Application is disposed of by directing that hearing of the Second Appeal is expedited. : 2 : [ABHAY S. OKA, J.] [ABHAY S. OKA, J.] [ABHAY S. OKA, J.]