1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 290 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5463 OF 1997 1. Navnath Undre & ors .. Petitioners versus 1. The Union of India & ors .. Respondents Mr.S.P.Saxena for Petitioners Mr.Kiran Kandpile for Union of India Mr.K.J.Presswalla for Respondent nos. 2 and 3. Ms.P.S.Cardozo, Assistant Government Pleader for for Respondent no.5 CORAM CORAM CORAM : : : S.B.MHASE AND S.B.MHASE AND S.B.MHASE AND D.G.KARNIK, D.G.KARNIK, D.G.KARNIK, JJ JJ JJ DATED DATED DATED : 2nd February, 2006 : 2nd February, 2006 : 2nd February, 2006 P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and respondent nos. 2,3 and 5. None present for other respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2,3 and 5 has no objection for allowing the Civil Application. Hence, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be 2 carried out within a period of two weeks. Return if any to the amended portion will be filed within a period of four weeks. (D.G. (D.G. (D.G. KARNIK, J) KARNIK, J) KARNIK, J) (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, J) J) J)