1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 139 OF 2011 Laxman Raoji Pote, R/o. Bhojade, Tq. Kopargaon, Dist. Ahmednagar. ....Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra 2. Collector, Ahmednagar. 3. Tahasildar, Kopargaon. 4. Superintendent of Police, Ahmednagar. 5. Police Inspector, Police Station, Kopargaon. 6. Mandabai w/o. Daggu Pote, R/o. Bhojade, Tq. Kopargaon, Dist. Ahmednagar. ....Respondents. Mr. Hemant V. Dhage, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. D. V. Tele, APP for respondents. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & T. V. NALAWADE, JJ. DATED : 24th March, 2011. ORAL ORDER : [ Per T. V. Nalawade, J.] 1. Heard both. 2. The applicant has prayed for issuing directions to police to give him police protection to protect his possession over the agricultural land and further to enable him to cultivate the land. Copy of the order on Exh. 2 5 in R.C.S.No. 373/2010 passed by Civil Judge Junior Division, Kopargaon is produced on record. By this order dated 24.01.2010, the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Kopargaon granted relief of temporary injunction in favour of plaintiff in respect of agricultural land. The applicant has made allegations that the defendants have committed breach of injunction order. 3. The Civil Court has granted relief of temporary injunction. The plaintiff can always approach the same Court if the breach of order is committed by the other side. Civil Court has also power to give police protection. Learned A.P.P. submitted that after receiving the application by the petitioner, it is informed to the petitioner that police protection can be granted, subject to payment of its costs by the petitioner. The petitioner submitted that he is ready to deposit the cost. 4. In view of aforesaid circumstances, there is no need to grant any relief as prayed in this petition. There is appropriate remedy available under Civil Procedure Code to the petitioner. The petition stands dismissed. [ T. V. NALAWADE, J.] [ NARESH H. PATIL, J.] ssc/criwp139.11