IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID TUESDAY, THE 7TH JUNE 2011 / 17TH JYAISHTA 1933 LA.App..No. 137 of 2009(D) -------------------------------------- [LAR.NO.320/2005 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,THALASSERY] .................... APPELLANT/RESPONDENT NO.2: ------------------------------------------------ MANAGING DIRECTOR, K.S.I.D.C, REPRESENTED BY ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, K.S.I.D.C, KESTON ROAD, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.JOBY CYRIAC. RESPONDENTS/CLAIMANTS AND R.1: ------------------------------------------------------- 1. POLAPPADI MADAVI, W/O.LATE KARUTHADI RAGHAVAN, THAIPARAMA HOUSE, P.O.MOORIYAD, KUTHUPARAMBA. 2. K.RAJAN, THAIPARAMA HOUSE, P.O.MOORIYAD, KUTHUPARAMBA. 3. K.VIMALA, THAIPARAMA HOUSE, P.O.MOORIYAD, KUTHUPARAMBA. 4. K.VASANTHA, THAIPARAMA HOUSE, P.O.MOORIYAD, KUTHUPARAMBA. 5. K.RAJEEVAN, THAIPARAMA HOUSE, P.O.MOORIYAD, KUTHUPARAMBA. 6. K.SAJEEVAN, THAIPARAMA HOUSE, P.O.MOORIYAD, KUTHUPARAMBA. 7. K.REENA, THAIPARAMA HOUSE, P.O.MOORIYAD, KUTHUPARAMBA. 8. K.SHEEJA, THAIPARAMA HOUSE, P.O.MOORIYAD, KUTHUPARAMBA. 9. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, LA, THALASSERY. BY THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/06/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. L.A.A. NO.137/2009-D: ORDER ON I.A. NO.388/2009 IN L.A.A. NO.137/2009-D DISMISSED 07/06/2011. SD/- HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. Prv. HARUN-UL-RASHID,J. ------------------------------- L.A.A. NO. 137 OF 2009 ------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JUNE, 2011 JUDGMENT The Managing Director, KSIDC, who is the requisitioning authority, is the appellant. The appeal is directed against the judgment and decree in LAR.No.320/2005 on the file of the Sub Court, Thalassery. An extent of 0.519 cents of land was acquired for the purpose of road widening for Industrial Growth Centre, Kuthuparambu as per notification dated 30/1/2001. The Land Acquisition Officer fixed the land value at the rate of `3,900/- per cent. The reference court enhanced the land value and re-fixed the same at the rate of `.12,000/- per cent. 2. I have gone through the impugned judgment. The claim is for enhanced compensation of `35,000/- per cent. The extent acquired is less than a cent. Considering the said fact, I do not think that it is necessary to examine the contentions raised by the appellant that the land value fixed by the court below is on a -2- L.A.A.No.137/2009 higher side. The said contentions can be considered in an appropriate case. Therefore, I do not propose to accept the grounds of appeal and to interfere with the fixation of the land value. The appeal fails and accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge. kcv.