IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 25TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 6TH PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 6446 of 2008(P) --------------------------------- CMA.20/2007 of ADDL.DISTRICT COURT-I,MAVELIKKARA OS.60/2007 of MUNSIFF COURT,CHENGANNUR .................... PETITIONER: ------------------- SANTHAMMA, GOPALAKRISHNA MANDIRAM, BUDHANOOR, ENNAKKADU VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.VINOD J.DEV SRI.PRAMOD J.DEV RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- VISWANATHAN, VADAKKOOTTIL HOUSE, PERINGAD MURI, BUDHANOOR, ENNAKKAD VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.KRISHNAN, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) No.6446 OF 2008 -------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of February, 2008 J U D G M E N T ~~~~~~~~~~~ This writ petition is preferred against the order of the Additional District Judge-I, Mavelikkara in C.M.A.No.20/2007 & 21/2007. The said appeals were preferred against the order of the Munsiff in I.A.No.297 of 2007 in O.S.No.60/2007 and in I.A.No.380/2007 in O.S.No.84/2007. The prayer was with respect to a prohibitory injunction and the entitlement is claimed on the basis of an oral agreement of the parties. The court below did not find in favour of the oral agreement at that stage and declined relief. I cannot find fault with the said finding at that stage for the reason that the matter requires evidence for proper appreciation. Therefore, I dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the trial court to dispose of the suit, as expeditiously as possible, within a time frame of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. (M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE) ps