1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2956 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 2956 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 2956 OF 2005 Smt. Vanita Vijay Mayekar and Ors. ... Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. R.D. Suryawanshi for Petitioner. Mr. R.M. Patne, A.G.P. for Respondent No. 1. Mr. P.K. Rele, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Piyush Shah for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & MRS ROSHAN DALVI.JJ. MRS ROSHAN DALVI.JJ. MRS ROSHAN DALVI.JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 15, 2005 DATED : DECEMBER 15, 2005 DATED : DECEMBER 15, 2005 P.C. . Rule. Heard forthwith. . There is a complaint pending wherein the Petitioners have been able to get interim relief. Considering that it is really not possible for us to grant relief as sought for in terms of Prayer clause (a). . However, the Petitioner contends that there are vacancies. If that be so, the respondent to 2 consider the petitioners against the vacancy which become available considering their long experience and work in the establishment and consider them preferentially for appointment against the vacancy to which they may be suitable and qualified. . The Petitioners to apply for the said posts which application will be considered by the Respondent. . Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (MRS. ROSHAN DALVI,J.)