Petltiones" Respondents HIGHCOURT;OF;.CHHATT1SGARH:BILASPUR Writ PeS:it5on (Cl No. 5742 of 2008 f^adan .Mohan Khaiwar,: aged about 46 years. S/o. Bageshwar Prasad Kharwar, Assistant Engineer, Vidyut Suraksha Sahayak Vidyut Nirikshak, Divisionaj Qffice'Near Dand Bhawan,.'Raipur, Distrjct Raipur (GG). Versus 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretery, Scheduied Trlbe.-and Welfere Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur 2. The Dlrector, Caste Certificate High Level Scrutiny CommitSee, jN>t. Deendaya! Upadhyay Nagar, Sector-4. Raipur (CG). 3« Member; .and iJolnt Dlrector, Caste Certifjcate Migh Level ScrutSny Commjttse, R. DeendayaJ Upadhyay Nagar, SeGtors-4, Raipur (CG). (Writ Petltion under ArtlcSe.226 of Constitutlon of India) SB: Hon'bSe iVSr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Mr. Harash Mahant and Mr. R. Pradhan, counse! for the petitioner,- Mr. Aiok Bakshl, Govt, Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 16th day of October, 2008) Being aggrieved by the shovv cause notlce dated 19-6-2CX)8 (Annexure P/1), whereby the petltloner has been asked to s.ybmit his expianation to the report of the vlgllance committee/ wherein the vigitance commlttee, after having investigated. the maaer, came to the condusjon that on the basls of the documents'coijected by the vigllance commlttee' it was difficuit to flnd out the social status of the petitloner. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner relles on a-decislon of the Hon'bte Supreme Court in .the .matter :of Director of Tribynal R3JU Welfare, Govemnnent of Andhra Pradesh vs. t.aveti Giri and another . Their Lordships in the matter of Director of Tribunal WeSfare, Government of Andhra Pradesh (supra) heid that "if the cialm for social status is found not genuine or doybtfu! or spurlous or falsely or wrongiy claimed, the Director concerned should issue show-cause notice supplying a copy of the report of the vigilance officer to the candidate by a reglstered post with ackrio^vledge'ment due../'. The Caste Scrutlny Commlttee has issued notice In consonance v/lth the observatlons made by 'the Hon'ble Supreme Coual in the matter of Director of' Tribunal Welfare, Govemment of Andiira Pradesh (supra). Thus,.this petition js premature,meritSess and deserves to be dismlssed sn iimlne. 3) in vlew of the foregojng, the petttion . Is dismissed Jf? ilmine. ConsequentSy, IA.NoJ stands disposed ot i sd/- I SatishK.Agnihotri 1 Judge '! AIR 1995 SC 1506 ki