HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.8163 and 9098 of 2011 Date: 18.04.2011 Between : Avvaru Subbarayudu. …….Petitioner And The State Government of A.P., rep. by the Chief Minister & others. ….Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.8163 and 9098 of 2011 COMMON ORDER : As the petitioner in both these writ petitions is one and the relief sought for is also with reference to a case registered in Crime No.97 of 2006 on the file of Venkatagiri Twon Police Station, they are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The writ petition in W.P.No.8163 of 2011 is filed with the prayer, which reads as under : “to issue an order(s), direction(s), or a writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to call for remarks and records from the Respondents herein relating to irregularities committed by the respondents 14 and 15 and to direct for proceedings, for administration of justice, once more, against the said respondents into the C.F.No.355 of 2011 on Hon’ble Judicial Magistrate First Class, Venkatagiri Town, in the Crime No.97/06 U/s.379 IPC (in our lands), Venkatagiri Town Police Station, Nellore District and take necessary action against the respondents and to pass such other or further orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of this cases, in the interest of justice.” Writ Petition No.9098 of 2011 is filed against 64 respondents, with the prayer, which reads as under : “to issue an order(s), direction(s), or a writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to call for remarks and records from the Respondents herein relating to irregularities committed by the respondent 52, R.61 to R.63 and to direct for proceedings, for administration of justice against the said respondents into the C.F.No.355 of 2011 on Hon’ble Judicial Magistrate First Class, Venkatagiri Town, in the Crime No.97/06 U/s.379 IPC (in our lands), Venkatagiri Town Police Station, Nellore District and take necessary action against the respondents and to pass such other or further orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of this cases, in the interest of justice.” In both these writ petitions, petitioner appeared as party-in-person. In both these writ petitions, there are no meaningful prayers. Affidavits are filed by making averments mostly irrelevant for the purpose of disposal of the writ petitions. It appears, the petitioner is in the habit of filing series of petitions/applications in this Court and also before various Courts. In both the writ petitions, he seeks relief relief with reference to Crime No.97 of 2006 registered on the file of Venkatagiri Town Police Station in Nellore District. The said crime is registered for the alleged offence under Section 379 of IPC and the petitioner herein is de facto complainant against four persons, namely, Mahankali Ramesh, Madana Krishnaiah, Madana Srinivasulu and Pasupuleti Venkata Das. It appears, he has filed a complaint alleging theft of pump set, removal of fencing, removal of pipe line and damage to crops, etc. On instructions, it is submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home that in the above said complaint filed by the petitioner, investigation is completed and investigation disclosed that the complaint is false and after obtaining permission from the Sub- Divisional Police Officer, Gudur, final report was also filed, referring the case as false. The final report was filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Venkatagiri, on 27.02.2007. It is submitted that in the aforesaid crime, the petitioner has filed a criminal miscellaneous petition in C.F.No.355 of 2011 before the learned Magistrate, by impleading respondents 3 to 13, by making baseless allegations. While the said petition is pending before the Court to record the statement of petitioner, these writ petitions are filed. The petitioner, who appeared in person, is not able to state his grievance and the relief sought for by him. Though the affidavits filed in support of the writ petitions are full of mistakes and averments are irrelevant to the relief sought for in the writ petition, in a routine manner, it appears, the office has numbered these writ petitions. With reference to very same Crime No.97 of 2006, the petitioner, on earlier occasion, approached this Court by filing three criminal petitions in Criminal Petition Nos.4517 of 2009, 10751 of 2009 and 30 of 2010. While disposing of the said petitions by a common order, a learned Single Judge of this Court, in the order, dated 31st of May 2010, has taken note of registering such absurd and obnoxiously arrayed petitions. In the said order, it was observed that the Registrar (Judicial) to take steps for not occurring such blunders in the Registry again. Inspite of such an observation, again, similar kind of mistakes have occurred by numbering these petitions, which are filed without any meaningful prayer, with irrelevant averments in the affidavits filed in support of these writ petitions by impleading unnecessary parties as respondents. It is to be noticed that in Crime No.97 of 2006, in which the petitioner is de facto complainant, final report is already filed, there appears no reason or justification at all to come up with these applications with the prayers as referred above. The writ petitions are totally misconceived and are filed by grossly abusing the process of this Court. Hence, these writ petitions are liable to be dismissed with costs. For the aforesaid reasons, both the writ petitions are dismissed with costs of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand) each. _____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 18th April 2011 N.B: A copy of this order be sent to the Registrar (Judicial), for information. (b/o) ajr