IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1617 (SS) OF 2005 Smt. Shanti Tamta , aged about 47 years, W/o Sri S.L. Tamta, R/o Village Jawahar Jyoti, Damuwadhunga behind Hydel Kathgodam, District Nainital. .................Petitioner. Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through its Principal Secretary, Medical Health and Family Welfare, Civil Secretariat, Dehradun. 2. Chief Medical Officer, Nainital. ............Respondents. Sri Lokendra Dobhal, Advocate for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Dated: 28.03.2006 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. By the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 19.09.2005 and order dated 30.06.2005 (Annexures No. 1 and 4 to the writ petition). Further prayer has been made for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue at Primary Health Centre Motahaldu Sub Centre, Kunwarpur. The petitioner has confined his prayer for disposal of her representation. Briefly stated, according to the petitioner, she was initially appointed on the post of Health Worker in the year, 1980 and was posted at Primary Health Centre Tharali District Chamoli, fromwhere she was transferred to Primary Health Centre Ram Garh sub centre Kool in the year, 1983, fromwhere she was transferred to Primary Health Centre 2 Motahaldu Sub Centre Pandey Niwar ion thue year, 1987 and in the yar, 1988 she was transferred to Narayn Nagpur Jaspur and in the year, 1989 she was transferred to Mahila Hospital Kashipur and in the year, 1991, she was transferred to Kunwarpur (present place of posting ). However, without going into the merit of the controversy, liberty is given to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the authority concerned within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of the certified copy of the order. If such a representation is filed, the same shall be disposed of by the authority concerned within a period of four weeks thereafter. However, in case, the petitioner has not been relieved, due to the academic session, the transfer order shall remain in abeyance till the academic session of year, 2006. The petitioner shall regularly be paid salary. The respondents undertakes to reconsider the representation of the petitioner. Subject to the aforesaid, writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) 28.03.2006 Rathour