IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-750 of 2011 Date of decision: 7th March, 2011 Sirajudeen @ Siraju … Petitioner Versus State of Haryana … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. O.P. Goyal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Shilpa Sahi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.S. Deol, Additional Advocate General, Haryana for the State. Mr. Jatinder Kumar, Advocate for the complainant. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.463 dated 12.09.2010 registered at Police Station Nuh under Sections 148/149/323/307 IPC and Section 25/54/59 of the Arms Act, 1959. A Coordinate Bench, on January 21, 2011 had passed the following order: “Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioner Sirajudeen @ Siraju in the incident that occurred on 11.9.2010, is alleged to have pelted stones on the complainant side. However, no specific injury is said to have been caused by the petitioner. Besides, the co-accused of the petitioner namely Wahid and Nurudin who are also alleged to have pelted stones on the complainant-Yusuf have been granted interim pre-arrest bail vide order dated 16.12.2010 passed in CRM No.M-36887 of 2010. List for hearing on 7.3.2011. Criminal Misc. No.M-750 of 2011 In the meantime, in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be admitted to interim bail on his furnishing personal bond and surety to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall, however, join investigation as and when called and shall abide by the conditions of Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.” Counsel for the State, on instructions from Shish Ram ASI, Police Station Nuh, has stated that in pursuance of the order reproduced above, petitioner has joined the investigation and is no longer required for custodial interrogation by the investigating agency. In view of the statement made by Counsel for the State, order dated January 21, 2011 passed by a Coordinate Bench, whereby interim bail was granted to the petitioner, is hereby affirmed and the present petition stands disposed of accordingly. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE March 7, 2011 rps 2