IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9590 of 2011 Smt.Mata Raj Rajeshwari Bhagwa Versus Ramanand Sharma & Anr ---------------------------------- 11. 20.09.2011. After some argument, the learned counsel, Sri Binod Shankar Modi appearing on behalf of the respondent No.1 and 2 and the learned counsel, Mr. Ganapaty Trivedi appearing on behalf of the Bihar State Board of Religious Truest agreed that the impugned order passed by the Court below dated 18.05.2006 passed by Munsif, Ist Court Munger in title eviction suit No.31 of 1989 is unsustainable in the eye of law because of the fact that in spite of the fact that the deity petitioner is plaintiff the Court below dismissed the suit on the ground that Bihar State Board of Religious Trust did not appoint any shebait in place of Sri Gorelal Mishra since deceased. The learned counsel for the Bihar State Board of Religious Trust submitted that Sri Murlidhar Mishra who is representing the deity has no locus standi to represent the deity because he is not appointed as Shebait nor he is a member of any Committee. The learned counsel further submitted that the Board will either appoint Shebait or will represent the deity in the suit henceforth or constitute a Committee for representing the deity. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, the impugned order as contained in Annexure 3 is set aside and the title eviction suit No.31 of 1989 is restored to its original file. Accordingly, this writ application is allowed and the impugned order is set aside. The Court below shall proceed according to law. Sanjeev/- (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)