-: 1 :- APPR-446/11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIM. APPL. NO. 446 OF 2011 IN CRIM. REVN. APPL. NO. 61 OF 2009. Hanumant Ajinath Godse. ..Applicant. Versus Smt. Sakhubai Bhimsen Sonawane & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr. M. S. Mohite i/b Mr. V. S. Talkute for the applicant. Mr. D. P. Adsule, APP. Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : November 17, 2011. P. C. : 1. Heard. This application is taken out for restoration of Revision Appl. No. 61 of 2009. By the order dated 9th April 2009 this Court granted four weeks time to the applicant to take appropriate steps for effecting service of the notice on 1st respondent. It was clarified in the said order that on failure to take appropriate steps within the stipulated period, revision would stand dismissed for non prosecution without further reference to the Court. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that appropriate steps were taken, however, 1st respondent could not be served as notice returned back with the postal remark that respondent no.1 is not traceable on the given srp -: 2 :- APPR-446/11 address. 2. The revision was dismissed even prior to respondent no.1 entering her appearance in the revision, therefore, her presence for the disposal of present application may not be necessary. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that respondent no.1 is very much residing on the address given in the cause title. She further submitted that respondent no.1 will be served if revision is restored. In addition to this, the applicant has taken efforts to serve respondent no.1, however, she could not be served. In these facts and for the reasons given in paragraph nos. 3 to 7, application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Revision is restored to the file. 4. Issue fresh notice of the revision to respondent no.1 returnable on 14th December 2011. Apart from Court notice, Advocate’s notice is also permitted. 5. Criminal application stands disposed of. (RANJIT MORE, J.)