IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS TUESDAY, THE 12TH JULY 2011 / 21ST ASHADHA 1933 WP(Crl.).No. 329 of 2011(S) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- THOMAS OUNDUKATTIL, S/O.SAJI O.T., AGED 24 YEARS, KAMBALAKALLU.P.O., MAMANKARA, NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BABU S. NAIR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KASARAGODE, PIN-671 121. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANHANGAD POLICE STATION, KANHANGAD, KASARGODE DISTRICT, PIN-671 315. 3. A.V.ABRAHAM, ANAKKUZHIYIL VEEDU, CHURCH OF GOD IN INDIA, THEKKIL.P.O., CHATTANCHAL, KANHANGAD, KASARGODE DISTRICT, PIN-671 541. 4. PONNAMMA, W/O.A.V.ABRAHAM, ANAKKUZHIYIL VEEDU, CHURCH OF GOD IN INDIA, THEKKIL.P.O., CHATTANCHAL, KANHANGAD, KASARGODE DISTRICT, PIN-671 541. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.M.KAMMAPPU. THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPCR NO.329 OF 2011: PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1.TRUE COPY OF THE CHELAN ISSUED BY THE SUB REGISTRAR, EDAKKARA DATED 22.6.2011. EXT.P2.TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.121/2011 DATED 25.6.2011 OF THE VAZHIKKADAVU POLICE STATION. K.M.JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(Crl.) No. 329 of 2011-S ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 12th day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T K.M.Joseph, J. Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a writ of Habeas Corpus for production of Praicy Babu, the alleged detenue. Allegation of illegal detention is made against respondents 3 and 4. 2. Of course, the case of the petitioner is that he is in love with the alleged detenue and that they have given notice under the Special Marriage Act. After giving notice the alleged detenue was staying along with the petitioner and his family. But, thereafter the alleged detenue was forcibly taken by her parents, submits the petitioner. 3. Today, the alleged detenue was present. We interacted with her. We also interacted with the petitioner. The alleged detenue would say that she is not under any illegal detention. She would further say that she is not inclined to go with the petitioner. She is not inclined even to talk with the petitioner. Petitioner has not been able to convince us of a case of illegal detention. The Writ Petition (Criminal) fails and it is dismissed. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. (M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS) JUDGE. MS