IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 3RD MARCH 2008 / 13TH PHALGUNA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 258 of 2008(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.32388/2007 Dated 31/10/2007 .................... PETITIONER/ PETITIONER IN WPC: ----------------------------------- S.AJITH GHOSH, S/O.SAHADEVA PANIKER, ALUVILA HOUSE, KUREEPUZHA, KAVANAD P.O., KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.SIVARAJ RESPONDENTS: 2ND RESPONDENT IN WPC: ----------------------------------- RAMAN SHRIVASTAVA, I.P.S., AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KERALA, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SHRI.BIJOY CHANDRAN, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V. GIRI, J. ------------------------------- C.C.C No. 258 OF 2008 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of March, 2008 JUDGMENT I have perused the affidavit filed by the respondent and also Annexure R1(A), I deem it proper to refer to para 9 of the affidavit which reads as follows: “09. It is submitted that the delay caused is due to the inherent nature of the process involved and administrative grounds, and there is no willful negligence on the part of this respondent. This respondent expresses unconditional apology for the delay and also for the inconvenience caused to this Hon'ble Court. It is further submitted that the delay in implementing the judgment of this Hon'ble Court may kindly be condoned.” In the circumstances, I do not think it is necessary to further proceed with the Contempt of Court Case. The same is therefore closed. V. GIRI, JUDGE ttb WPC No. 6246 OF 2008 2