IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 14TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 28585 of 2007(C) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- ABUBAKER, AGED 68 YEARS, S/O KUNHALANKUTTY, MANNETHODI MECHERI HOUSE, VALLUVAMBRAM (PO), POOKOTTOOR, ERANAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.K.SAIDALIKUTTY, SRI.LAL K.JOSEPH, SRI.A.A.ZIYAD RAHMAN, SMT.SHEENA SAMUEL. RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, THE KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, DISTRICT OFFICE, 19/269A, PERINTALMANNA ROAD, KUNNUMMAL, MALAPPURAM (PO). 3. MUMTAZ THARAMMAL, W/O.ABDULLA, THARAMMAL HOUSE, VALLUVAMBRAM (PO), POOKOTTOOR, ERANAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. K.NARAYANAN, S/O.KAVUNGAL RAMAN, MACHERI HOUSE, VALLUVAMBRAM (PO), POOKOTTOOR, ERANAD TALUK,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. ADV. SMT.K.K.THULASY BHAI,SC,POLLUTION C.BOARD FOR R1 & R2. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.28585 of 2007 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 5th November, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioner approached this court aggrieved by Ext.P11 closure order dated 26.7.2007. The main contention of the petitioner is that prior to the closure order, no notice was given to the petitioner regarding inspection. Still further, it is contended that petitioner's is not an industrial unit requiring consent. These are brought to the notice of the second respondent by Ext.P10. There will be a direction to the second respondent to pass appropriate orders on Ext.P10 with notice to the petitioner and respondents 3 and 4 within three months from the date of production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Petitioner will serve a copy of this judgment and the writ petition on the contesting respondents. Further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P11 will depend on the action thus taken by the second respondent on Ext.P10. The writ petition is disposed of as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. tgs KURIAN JOSEPH, J ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.28585 of 2007 ---------------------------------------------- J U D G M E N T Dated 5th November, 2008.