v“ 1 \5‘ y IN THE HxGH COURE OF CHI-IATK'ISGARH AT BILASFUR (c.G.) my. No.__2§_f_ of 2002 (Unéer Articles 226 8:7227,‘ Constitution of india) PETITIObER : Dau Niranjan Lal Gupta, aged about 82 years, son o£' late Shri Man'nulal Gupta, Freeéom Fighter, r/o Kasariciih, Civil — Lines, Durg. \x L n AM "iv-’1‘?,v f RESPO i/aChlef State cf Secretary, Chhattlsgarh Ralnur. through the NDE «Ii VERSUS /2. The Collector, D'urg. 3 The Tehsildar, Durgo . The Dy. Director, Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh, Burg. 5. M.P. Housing Boar& throughvits Deputy Housing Commissioner, Durg. ‘ 6 Municipal Corporation, Durg, through its Commis sioner. y/v @gTION UNDER ARTICLE$ 226 & 227. CONSTITUTEON OF INDIA 7- . . e; 44,; A .- m 1 an: A." 4.1-; "an in \‘M HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 736 OF 9009 Dau Niranjan Lal Gupta Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- None for the‘petitioner. Shri N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyerfor the State. xx Shri Avinash Mishra, Advocate for the respondent N36. PETITIONER wg ORDER (ORAL) ‘ (Passed on this 20th day of October, 2010) 1. The matter is called for hearing. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. 2t ln view of the above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. i / l Sdl- ‘ _ Satish K. Agmhotn ' Judge r r W V i