IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CAW No.1703/2009 in Writ Petition No.601/2009 Vijay s/o Vitthalrao Suryawanshi Vs. The Maharashtra State Khadi & Village Industries Board and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. CORAM : A.P. LAVANDE AND P.D. KODE, JJ. DATED : 13th AUGUST, 2009. Heard Ms. Dixit, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Kakani, learned counsel for respondents 1 to 4 and Mr. Padhy, learned counsel for respondent no.5. Learned counsel for the parties submit that inadvertently this Court instead of respondent no.1, who is to decide appeal filed by the petitioner mentioned as respondent no.2 in paragraph 5 of the judgment dated 27/7/2009. Learned counsel submit that respondent no. 1 is the appellate authority. In view of the above, registry is directed to carry out necessary corrections in paragraph 5 of the judgment dated 27.7.2009 by substituting respondent no.1 in place of respondent no.2. Application stands disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Ambulkar.