IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41401 of 2009 AMARNATH SINGH, Son of Nagendra Singh, R/o village Shahpur Junaid, P.S. Laxmipur, P.S. Sakra, District Muzaffarpur …. Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ……… Opp. Party ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Vivekanand Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, A.P.P. ---- 2 26.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is not named in the first information report. He has not named in the first information report but he had been identified in T.I. parade. It is stated that the petitioner has clean antecedent. Learned counsel for the State submitted that the petitioner has been identified in T.I. parade and it is apparent from the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Samastipur, vide order dated 8.10.2009 rejecting the prayer for bail of this petitioner that upon his confession before the police looted money, mobile phone and bomb, which was kept by co-accused Md. Mumtaz was recovered. In that view of the matter since petitioner has been identified in T.I. parade and his confession before the police led to the recovery of looted articles and bomb also, I am not inclined to grant bail to this petitioner. This application is dismissed at this stage. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)