HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.(S) No. 6928 of 2006 (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Con$titution of India! Appearance: 8191i Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer, for the State on advance copyr Shri Decpak Jain, counsel for the petitioncr. ORAL ORDER (24.08.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard on admission. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has passed D.Ed. examination on his own expenses, therefore, he is entitled to receive two advance increments according to circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999. He also submits that in many identical matters, the petitions have been allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwgi Vs. Municigal Comorat‘iog, Durq and another {2006 (m WJR-CG 96}. He submits that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the said Judgment. This legal position is not disputed by the learned counsel for the State. However, he submits that the order may be passed in terms of the said judgment, but it shall be subjected PETITIONER Jalesh Kumar Verma son of Shri Salik Ram Verma, aged about 39 years, Assistant Tcacher, Primary School, Rauchan, Block-Bedla, District Kabirdham (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS 1 State of Chhattisgarh, Through- The Secroteuy, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 2 District Education O$cer, Kabirdham (C.G.) 3 Block Education Officer, Kawardha, Distm'ct Kabirdham (C.G.) @ 2 w.P.(S) No. 6928 of 2006 Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed in terms of the ordsr passed in case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra) subject to Veriflcation of the facts as to Whether the petitioner had. acquired D.Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per circulars dated 24. 12. 1998 and 01.03.1999 and fuxther Whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. The petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to I \t M costs. f i Sdl- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge vatti