IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.28267 of 2008 SANTOSH PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 24.07.2008 Earlier prayer of bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 04.12.2007 passed in Cr. Misc. No.45480 of 2007 on the ground that the kidnapped boy has named this petitioner. It has been submitted by the learned advocate of the petitioner that the very statement of the kidnapped boy is doubtful in view of the fact that the boy was not recovered by the police and only after one day of the alleged kidnapping he surfaced again and his statement was recorded by the police in which he named this petitioner as his kidnapper. Learned advocate further submitted that the F.I.R. will show that the boy had gone to bring T.V. for seeing movies and thereafter he did not return. Learned advocate further submitted that there is possibility that the boy is taken in the night at some other place for viewing T.V. and then he took up a false story. There appears some truth in the submission of the learned advocate of the petitioner, as it is clear that the boy himself came back within 24 hours and he was not recovered by the police. Considering the submission of both sides, petitioner Santosh Paswan is ordered to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in Piro P.S. case no. 56 of 2007. Uday/ ( Syed Md. Mahfooz Alam, J. )