IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13707 of 2010 JAGMOHAN SINGH, son of Late Shrinath Singh, resident of Village-Panchpokhari, Post Office- Sakari, P.S. Kudra, District- Kaimur (Bhabua). ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, Patna through its Chairman, Vidhyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 2. The General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer, Magadh Electric Supply Area, Gaya. 3. The Electrical Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Bhabua, District Kaimur. 4. The Accounts Officer, Electric Division, Sasaram, Rohtas. 5. The Deputy Director of Accounts, Magadh Electric Supply Area, Gaya. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 25.8.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Board. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 31st of January, 2009 while working under respondent no.3, he is being paid only 90% of the pension and that too two months of arrears of pension have remained to be paid. Besides the above, the petitioner has not been paid his gratuity amount till date. Learned counsel for the respondent-Board submits that the representation of the petitioner, which was filed on 6th of April, 2010, is not clear with regard to the unpaid claims. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Electrical Executive - 2 - Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Bhabua, District-Kaimur (respondent no.3), with a copy each to the Accounts Officer, Electric Division, Sasaram, Rohtas (respondent no.4) and the Deputy Director of Accounts, Magadh Electric Supply Area, Gaya (respondent no.5). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of his unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled at the earliest and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)