IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH M.A. N0. l7.sr 12QO€ APPELLANT ^APPLICANT RESPONDENTS ^•^ ^yy ^y ^ou ^••"' Mrs. Pramila Rajput Wd/o. Jeevan Lodhi aged about 1.9 years Occupation- House wife R/o. Vill. Jarhapara, P.S. Chauki Sambalpur, P.S. Nandghat Dist. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS :1.^ Mohd. Mustak, S/o. Ibrahim Musalman, aged 35 years 2,^ Usuf Mohammad Bathiya < S/o. Bafati Mohammad aged about 40 years, Caste- Musalman, occupation-Owner of Vehicle (Truck), No.1 and 2 both Resident of Nandghat, Police Station Nandghat, Tahsil- Nawagarh, District-Durg (C.G.) 3^ The Oriental Insurance Com.Ltd. Kachahari Chowk Madina Manjil Raipur, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) ,4.r- Mrs. Poomima Bai f-' W/o. Tilak Ram Lodhi ^' aged about 35 years Tilak Ram, S/o. Sadaram aged 45 years, Caste-Lodhi No.4 & 5 Both Agriculturist, R/o. Vill. Jarhapara Out-Post Sambalpur, Police Station - Nandghat, District Durg (C.G.) ^v.1 ^ // 2 // w.^ MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL U/S 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE ACT. 1988 T WH^ITW^If^ 'yssr '^ll<4l<r)^, yi^y^Kc, f®l<ni-yLi,< WhB-^^-4.'^...............-^200^ r 3H^?T TTSW (^3^ST) 3?T^T ^ ^Jch ^ <3'^T *^IW ^a Sahu 'yRHW^^i ^V^ S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. A 23.08.2010 None for appellant. None for respondents. The matter is ca!!ed for | occaslons, none appears nor a| behalf of the appeliant. The appel) matter. In view of the above, the (|natter Is dismissed for want of )secution. Sd/- N. K. Agarwal chl^M^1<< 'RTR^? ^F 'fe1^ 'd^-^K ^^H^n^T 3aw/a! heanng twlce, On both the iy representation is made on ant may not be interestedl in the