HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.3167 of 2009 Date of Decision: 25.10.2010 **** Harinder Kaur . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. BN Sehgal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. H.S. Brar, Addl. AG Punjab Mr. Rohit Rampal, Advocate for respondent No.3 ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) {1}. Vide order dated 25.07.2008 (Annexure P2) passed by the Director Public Instructions (Colleges), Punjab, the petitioner was ordered to be re-instated in service by imposing the punishment of Censure only. {2}. The Management of the College, as per its reply/affidavit, did not give effect to the order of DPI (Colleges) as its statutory appeal against the same filed under the Punjab Affiliated Colleges (Security of Service of Employees) Act, 1974 was pending consideration before the College Tribunal. CWP No.3167 of 2009.doc - 2 – {3}. Counsel for the petitioner states that during the pendency of this writ petition, the above-stated appeal has been disposed of by the Tribunal vide its order dated 05.11.2009. He further states that the Tribunal’s order has not been challenged by the Management before this Court or any other Forum. {4}. That being so, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3-Management to implement the order passed by the College Tribunal, if it has attained finality, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. {5}. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 25.10.2010 vishal shonkar