IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 21192 of 2010 Date of Decision: 7.12.2010. Sunita Goswami --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Harminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. R.D. Sharma, D.A.G., Haryana and Mr. Ajay Nara, Advocate present in the Court have been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents no.1 and 2 to 3 respectively. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. Plot no. 751, Sector 46, Faridabad measuring 90 sq. meter was allotted to the petitioner vide memo dated 10.5.1990 by the respondent no.3. It is stated that the possession of the said plot could not be given due to some litigation. It is further stated that the aforesaid plot was exchanged with an alternative plot bearing no. 847, Sector 45, Faridabad but the possession of the said plot has also not been delivered to the petitioner. Petitioner made a representation dated 16.8.2010 (Annexure P-4) claiming possession but the same has not been decided till date. CWP. No. 21192 of 2010 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if, respondents are directed to take decision on the representation made by the petitioner, referred to above. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to take decision on the representation made by the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said respondent. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 7.12..2010. lucky