IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 3539 of 2011. Judgment reserved on 20.7.2011. Date of decision: 08.08.2011 ___________________________________________________ Shalini Kaundal …. Petitioner. Versus State of HP & Ors. ….. Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, J. Whether approved for reporting? No. For the petitioner: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Dy. AG for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate for respondent No.4. ______________________________________________________ Deepak Gupta, J. 1. By means of this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 13.5.2011 whereby she has been transferred from GPS Shamlaghat (Shimla) to GPS Farog (Tikkar) vice respondent No.4-Tilak Raj. 2. The contention of the petitioner is that she has been transferred only with a view to accommodate the private respondent who could not have been adjusted at Shimla for a period of five years from his initial appointment. ___________ Whether the Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment Yes. 2 3. It is not necessary to go into the disputed questions raised before me, because it has now been brought to the notice of the Court that vide order dated 25th July, 2011, the petitioner has been promoted and posted at Government Sr. Secondary School, Tharola (Shimla). Therefore, the impugned order dated 13.5.2011 does not in any manner affect the petitioner. The petition is, therefore, infructuous and is disposed of accordingly. No costs. (Deepak Gupta) Judge August 8, 2011. (Krn Guleria)