1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 26.07.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA Criminal Original Petition(MD) No.8651 of 2011 M.Charles ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The State rep.,by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Valliyoor,Tirunelveli District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelvel. ...Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying to pass an order directing the respondents particularly the first respondent to hand over back the document namely pathaka (labour card) issued to the petitioner by his employer at Muscut in the Omen country forthwith and pass any other order as this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the above case. For Petitioner :Mr.S.Palanivelayutham For Respondent :Mr.K.V.Rajarajan Government Advocate (Crl.side) ORDER The petitioner approaches this Court with a prayer to direct the first respondent to hand over back the document namely pathaka (labour card) issued to the petitioner by his employer at Muscut in the Omen country forthwith. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by one Mallika, the petitioner was called for enquiry and at the time of enquiry, labour card issued to the petitioner has been seized by the respondent police and it was not returned back. Hence, the petitioner has come forward with this application for a direction directing the respondent to hand over the document namely, pathaka (labour card) issued to the petitioner by his employer at Muscut in the Omen country. 3. Heard the learned Government Advocate. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents herein filed counter affidavit stating that on receipt of the complaint given by Mallika, the enquiry has been conducted and on that day, both the petitioner and the complainant have appeared along with the respective counsel and the matter was settled. In the counter affidavit, there is a specific denial that the respondent have not received any vital document namely, pathaka (labour card) from the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4. Considering the fact that the petitioner has not filed any document to show the labour card was handed over to the first respondent at the time of enquiry, recording the averments in paragraph No.3 of the counter, this petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (RTI) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Valliyoor,Tirunelveli District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelvel. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,Madurai. +1CC TO MR.S.PALANI VELAYUTHAM, ADVOCATE SR.25078 Ses SR : 10.08.2011 : 2p/5c Crl.O.P.(MD)No.8651 of 2011 26.07.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/