IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. NO 3538 of 2007 Date of decision:20.7.2007 Jasbir Singh ....PETITIONER VERSUS Nutrivet Company Pvt. Ltd. & Others ....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI Present: Mr.Sandeep Chopra, Advocate for petitioner PERMOD KOHLI,J. (ORAL) This Civil Revision is directed against the order dated 2.6.2007 passed by Civil Judge (Jr.Divn.), Ludhiana allowing the application filed by the respondents for disclosing the name of the wife of the petitioner. Vide the impugned order, the trial court has directed the petitioner to disclose the name of the wife who is allegedly wrongly named in the suit as defendant no.3. It is contended that Order 6 Rule 5 of the CPC having been repealed, the trial court has no jurisdiction to pass the impugned order. I am :2: unable to accept this contention. Notwithstanding the repeal of Order 6 Rule 5, the trial court is not without jurisdiction to pass such an order in the interest of justice or fairness. I do not find any infirmity in the impugned order. In view of the above, I find no merit in this Civil Revision which is accordingly dismissed. (Permod Kohli) JUDGE 20.7.2007 MFK NOTE:Whether referred to Reporter or not: NO