IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3261 of 2009 1. RAM NANDAN SINGH S/O LATE BABU LAL SINGH VILL- BERHNA, P.S. BARH, DISTT. PATNA Versus 1. BIHAR STATE BOARD OF RELIGIOUS TRUST, VIDYAPATI MARG, PATNA THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT KISHOR KUNAL 2. TULSI DAS GOSWAMIN S/O LATE DUBRI GOSWAMI R/O B.H. COLONY, P.S. AGAMKUAN, DISTT. PATNA ----------- 02. 06.04.2011 In view of the show cause and details of calculation given for payment already made to the petitioner, the contempt application is dismissed. If there is any error in the accounting and the details which have been furnished to the petitioner and communicated earlier, he is not precluded from demonstrating that variation before the Administrator of Bihar State Board of Religious Trusts. It goes without saying that the discrepancy, if established, will have to be reconciled otherwise the issue will be allowed to rest. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)