IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.19125 of 2006 Date of decision: 04.12. 2006 Dalu Ram @ Dal Chand .........Petitioner Versus Commissioner Gurgaon and Ors. ...........Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE NIRMAL YADAV Present: Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate for the petitioner ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, J (Oral) The petitioner has impugned the order dated 25.07.2006 (Annexure P-3) passed by the Commissioner Gurgaon, Division, Gurgaon, by which the case has been remanded back to the Collector for decision afresh after impleading the Municipal Committee, Pataudi as a party. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the Municipal Committee, Pataudi is not a necessary party and that the Local Commissioner, appointed by the Court, need not be produced in the Court. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we are of the considered opinion that as the land in dispute is under the ownership of the Municipal Committee, Pataudi, therefore, it would be necessary to implead it as a party and only thereafter the case can be decided. No ground. Dismissed. ( ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA) JUDGE ( NIRMAL YADAV) JUDGE December 04, 2006 mohan