IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7655 of 2011 1. HARE RAM YADAV, S/o Bhadar Yadav. 2. Saryug Yadav, S/o Bhadar Yadav. 3. Bikesh Kumar, S/o Saryug Yadav. All R/o Village-Bela, P.S. and District-Supaul. 4. Maheshwari Yadav, S/o Chichai Yadav, R/o Village- Bara, P.S. and District-Supaul. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 08.03.2011 The petitioners are aggrieved with the order dated 22.05.2010 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in G.R. No. 116 of 2001 by which two witnesses who had filed their attendance were permitted to be examined even after the prosecution case was closed on two earlier occasions. In view of the fact that the Trial Court has considered it necessary for their examination, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. However, the Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and fix the certain date of examination of these two witnesses. In case, they fail to turn up for their examination no further indulgence shall be given to them. Further, the trial should be concluded within the next three months positively from the date of receipt of this order. With these observations, the application is disposed off. Let this order be communicated through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)