w .H w . \‘ (5% HIGH COURT OF CHHATI‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 6797 of2007 PETITIONER : Gopal Das Mahant. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : The State of Chhattisgarh & 0&1e1s. wnrr PEImON UNDER ARrIc 22 o s ON OF $3 Hon’hle Sin-i Sansh K. Agnihom, J Present: Shn R Pradhan, Advocate for the petitioner Shn Shashank Thakur Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No l to 3 ‘ Shri Sunil Sahu, Advocate for the respondgm No. 4. “ORDER ORAL ~ ‘(Passed on 3O day ofJune, 2011) l. Learned mumel appearing for the State/respondent No. 1 to 3 submits that the petitioner has already continued at 1i1e orig'nal place of posting for more than 3 1/2 years on amount of inten‘m order gamed by this Court 17.11.2007. The State/respondent No. 1 to 3 may be granted liberty to pass appropriate orders keeping in view public interest and administrative exigency. Shri Thakur further submits that the State/respondent No. 1 to 3 shall not insist upon compliance of the impugned order dated and (13.11.2007 (Annexure P/l) in respect ofthe petitioner. 2. At this stage, when no effect could be given to the impugned order dated 03.11.2007 (Annexure P/l) on account ofthe interim order dated 17.11.2007, thus, it is not necessary to» go into legality and validity ofthe aforestated impugned orders. 3. In view of the above, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- l Satish K."A’"}ghihotri Judge