IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 4138 of 2011 Decided on 16.6.2011. Seema Sharma ……..Petitioner vs. State of H.P. and ors. ……Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. for respondent No. 1 Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice (oral). The petitioner, who is a PTA teacher, is aggrieved since she has been replaced by the private respondent, who is a contract employee. But, it is seen that this took place in the year 2008. Be that as it may. According to the petitioner, there is vacancy available for the private respondent, where she is willing to work. The petitioner may obtain willingness of the private respondent and produce the same before the Director (Education), in which case the Director (Education) shall accommodate the private respondent in that vacancy and in the resultant vacancy, in case the petitioner is otherwise eligible and entitled for appointment as per PTA policy shall be re-engaged immediately. The petitioner has further grievance that remuneration for the period she already worked as PTA teacher has not been paid. It is for the petitioner to bring the matter to the notice of the Director (Education), in which 2 case appropriate action in that regard shall also be taken by the Director (Education) within another three months. 2. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice (Justice V.K. Sharma) Judge. June 16, 2011 (LSP/pankaj)