IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.DENESAN THURSDAY, THE 30TH NOVEMBER 2006 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 WP(C).No. 31820 of 2006(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SHANAVAS M., INDUSTRIES EXTENSION OFFICER (NEDUMANGAD BLOCK), TALUK INDUSTRIES OFFICE, NEDUMANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.S.MOHAMMED AL RAFI RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, DIRECTORATE OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SHRI. BIJOY CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/11/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.K.DENESAN, J. ----------------------------- WP(C)No. 31820 OF 2006 ----------------------------- Dated this the 30th November, 2006. JUDGMENT Challenge is to Ext.P4 revised seniority list of Industries Extension Officer for the period from 1.7.1983 to 30.6.2002. The impugned circular inter alia says that genuine fresh claims/objections, corrections/if any, shall be obtained and forwarded on or before 20.10.2006 along with the service books of the incumbents concerned. 2. The petitioner has got serious objections against Ext.P4 list. Highlighting the facts to be noted by the first respondent for the purpose of making corrections in the list, petitioner has filed Ext.P5 detailed representation before the first respondent through proper channel within the time permitted. Counsel for the petitioner submits that early orders are necessary on Ext.P5. 3. Having herd Govt. Pleader also, I feel that the writ petition itself can be disposed of issuing appropriate directions. 4. The first respondent is directed to consider Ext.P5 as also any other objections or representations filed by aggrieved persons against Ext.P4, afford them an opportunity of being heard and take final decision in the WPC 31820/2006 2 matter within two months on the petitioner producing a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. K.K.DENESAN Judge jj