( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1170 OF 2009 Miss Bharati Sukhdeo Patare .. Petitioner Versus Deepak Narsingh Yeri .. Respondent Shri N.C. Garud, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM : P.R. BORKAR,J. DATED : 20.01.2010 P.C. :- 1. Heard Adv. Shri N.C. Garud for the petitioner. This writ petition is filed being aggrieved by the impugned order passed on 8th December, 2009, below Exh.1 of S.T.C. No. 2975 of 2007. The accused who had sought repeated adjournments was directed to keep his witness present. But the accused failed to keep his witnesses present on 8th December, 2009, inspite of specific order to that effect on application Exh.81. Therefore, the evidence of the accused is closed and the matter is fixed for final arguments. ( 2 ) 2. It may also be noted that application Exhs. 77, 78, 79, and 81 were filed for adjournments for leading evidence, but inspite of adjournments, the accused is seeking further adjournment. In my opinion, this is not a case to be entertained in extra-ordinary jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed in limine. However, it is made clear that the petitioner is at liberty to raise this issue in appeal in case such occasion arises. [P.R. BORKAR,J.] snk/2010/JAN10/crwp1170.09