:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1619 OF 2003 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1619 OF 2003 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1619 OF 2003 IN IN IN SUIT NO. 1533 OF 2003 SUIT NO. 1533 OF 2003 SUIT NO. 1533 OF 2003 Raymond Ltd .....Plffs. Plffs. Plffs. vs. Pantaloon Retail (I) Ltd and anr. .....Defnds. Defnds. Defnds. Sandeep Parikh i/b. Rajani Associates Sandeep Parikh i/b. Rajani Associates Sandeep Parikh i/b. Rajani Associates for the plaintiffs. for the plaintiffs. for the plaintiffs. Manish Saurastri for defendant no.1. Manish Saurastri for defendant no.1. Manish Saurastri for defendant no.1. CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATE : 6th October, 2005. P.C. :. 1. Learned counsel for the defendant no.1 states that he is not using the mark of the plaintiff and the ad-interim order in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) may be confirmed. In so far as defendant no.2 is concerned though they are served they are not appearing in the matter. In that view of the matter motion made absolute interms of ad-interim order dated 16.6.2003. sd/- :2: *********