1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 245 OF 2009 Shri Sinamai Sansthan, Chandur Bazar & others .vs. Chitrabai Manikrao Malwar & another ________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders. Registrars orders. Mr. P.S. Patil, Advocate for the appellants, CORAM : S.A. BOBDE & F.M. REIS, JJ. DATED : JUNE 30, 2009. This appeal is preferred against the order dated 20.1.2009 passed by the learned Single Judge in Appeal Against Order No. 115/08, whereby the application for temporary injunction filed by the respondents/plaintiffs for grant of temporary injunction was allowed. Section 100-A of the Civil Procedure Code provides as under :- “S. 100-A. No further appeal in certain cases :- Notwithstanding anything contained in any Letters Patent for any High Court or in any instrument having the force of law or in any other law for the time being in force, where any appeal from an original or appellate decree or order is heard and decided by a Single Judge of a High Court, no further appeal shall lie from the judgment and decree 2 of such Single Judge.” In view of the said provision in Section 100-A of the Civil Procedure Code, the impugned judgment is passed in an appeal preferred by the respondents against the refusal of the application for temporary injunction by the learned Single Judge. Therefore, the Letters Patent Appeal against such a judgment is not maintainable. In view of the above, the Letters Patent Appeal is summarily dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE. J.