Raw)“— Q’MG?‘ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILAsPUR Review Applicatio‘iéNo, L242 /2oo7 . APPLICANTS 1. Union of India thrbugh thC RESPONDENTS Secretary, Ministry of Home No. 1 TO 4 Affairs, New Delhi 2. Asstt. Inspector General (Estt.) Directorate General, Central Industrial Security Force, Block— 13, CGO, Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi — 3 3. Dy. Inspector General Central Industrial Security Force,' Unit Bhilai Steel Plant, ’Bhilai Durg. 4. Commandant, ' Central Industrial Security Force, Unit Bhilai Steel Plant, BhilaiDurg. a ' Versus y RESPONDENTS l. R.P. ‘Mishra, S/o. S.N. PETITIONER M‘ishra, aged 37 years (in W.P.) R/o. Q. No. D, Block No. 8, Street No. 7, Sector—3 Bhilai r Bhilai Steel Plant, through its Managing Director, Ispat Bhalwan, Bhilai Steel Plant, Township Durg RESPONDENT 2. No. 5 ORDER [PASSED IN' CHAMBER) (Delivered on /y / 1 1/2007) Dhirendra Mishra, J The applicants/respondents No. 1 to 4 have preferred this review petition for reviewing the order dated 14—1 1—2006 passed in W.P. No. l and the respondents were directed to give the relief to the petitioner in terms of section 47 of the, Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995. The applicants have also filed an application for condonation of delay in filing this review petition as the same has been filed with a delay of 125 days. 2. The reason assigned for delay in filing this petition is that copy of the order was sent to higher authorities foritheir 280/2006 whereby this Court allowed the writ petition of the respondent No. V, Wr .Vg ? perusal and in this process the petition could not be’file Within time. 8. The grounds urged by the applicants in this petition are that the applicants could not take the plea in their bring to the notice of this Court theNIda-o-tiee “K . . reply and "V issued by the Government of India dated 10th September, 2002 whereby in exercise of power conferred by proviso to Section 33 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and full Participation) Act, 1995, the Central Government having regard to the type of work carried on exempted all categories of posts of " z ‘Reserves Police Force (CRPF), combatant personnel” only of the Central Para Military Forces ( CPMFs) namely Central Border Security Force (BSF), ‘ Indo—Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) and Assam Rifles from the provisions of the said section. 4. After going through the petition Yof the petitioner and the order passed by this Court under review, it is observed that the cause of action arose to the petitioner on 7—6—2000 well before V the notification dated 10th September, 2002. Therefore/there is g V'no ground to the applicants for reviewing the order dated 14— 11-2006. ‘ 5. In the result, the review petition is dismissed as the reasons assigned for delay in filing of, this petition are not sufficient as also there is no groun J w ll d for review of the order' dated 14—11—2006. ' j k