1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1477 OF 2009 Atik Akmal Khan .... Applicant. V/s The State of Maharashtra ..... Respondent. Mr. A.P. Mundargi, Senior Counsel i/b Mr. Shreekant V. Gavand for the applicant. Mr. Rajesh More, APP for the State. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATE : 30th March, 2009 P.C:- 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant and the learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. Applicant has been arrested in connection with the offence punishable under sections 143, 145, 147, 148, 332, 353, 395, 506(II), 452, 427 of the Indian Penal Code and section 37(3) of the Bombay Police Act. It is submitted that the counter complaint was also filed by the applicant herein against the present complainant and others. It is submitted that both parties have resolved their differences and the complainant had filed an affidavit in the Sessions Court, stating therein that the dispute between the parties has been resolved. The complainant is present in Court. The 2 learned APP has taken instructions in order to find out whether any pressure has been exercised on the said complainant for filing the said affidavit. The learned APP informs that no such complaint has been made by the complainant. 3. Since the dispute between the parties is resolved, continued detention of the applicant, in my view, is not necessary. 4. Applicant be released on bail in C.R. No. 65 of 2009 in the sum of Rs 5000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount. He shall initially furnish cash bail and thereafter shall furnish sureties within a period of two weeks from today. Applicant shall report to the concerned Police Station as and when called. 5. Application is disposed of. (V.M. KANADE, J.)