$1 Cz§ \W ykggm WW v IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR QCHHA’I‘TISGARH) WRIT PETITION (S) No. W4 9(0F 201g W x KurrvM’ ~ PETITIONER: : WvB'rv‘ NirmalAAgrawal, S/o Shri Moolchand Agrawal, Aged about 46 years, R/o Kailashpuri, Near~Jyoti Vid‘yalaya, Raipur (CG) VERSUS if RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of School Education, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG) 2. Pt. Sunder Lal Sharma Open University, Bilaspur, Through its Registrar, Bilaspur (CG) (1’ 3. Dr. Awadh Ram Chandrakar, Vice Chancellor, Pt. Sunder Lal Sharma Open University, Vyapar Vihar, Bilaspur (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA W 2) .waPzLS). WSTH'O In zoo WW WWW wmwm K: v 4.10.201 11 None for the petition . e Shri Chandresh Shr‘iv stava, P.L. for the State. Since none appears f r the petitioner even when the case is caHed in the 5 d round, this court has no other option but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. Accordingiy, the writ petition is dismissed for want 1% ibil i ‘ i {iPritinkesr Sd/ éiwaker Judge of prosecution. e n i \ :/ V i