IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT CONTEMPT CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 66 OF 2007. PETITION NO. 66 OF 2007. PETITION NO. 66 OF 2007. Satyanarayan N. Maripelli. ... Petitioner. Versus. Sundernagar Coop.Housing Society Ltd. and others. ... Respondents. Shri S.S.Redekar for the Petitioner. Shri R.D.Soni i/by M/s.Ram & Co. for the Respondent No.1. Shri Utangale i/by M/s.Utangale & Co.for Respondents Nos.2, 3 and 7. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 5th June, 2007. : 5th June, 2007. : 5th June, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocates appearing for the parties. My attention has been invited to the orders dated 28th February 2006 and 9th January 2007 passed by the Division Bench of this Court. On a plain reading of the averments in the petition, I find that this is not a case of deliberate breach of the orders passed by this Court. My attention has been invited to the orders dated 31st July 2006 and 19th September 2006 passed by the Assistant Registrar of Cooperative Societies (SRA), Mumbai. It is for the Petitioner to take appropriate steps/action on the basis of the said orders. However, this petition under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 cannot be entertained. Subject to what is observed above, no case is made out for taking action under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Petition is rejected. Judge. Judge. Judge.