1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 114 OF 2008 Ashok Uddhav Hiwale ... Applicant Vs. Durga Ashok Hiwale and Anr. ... Respondents Mr. Ashok Hiwale Applicant in person Mrs. Revati Mohite for Respondent No.1. CORAM : MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. Dated :- 7th September, 2009. PC : This revision application is filed challenging the order of maintenance passed by the Family Court Judge, Pune dated 10th January, 2005 under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. Original petitioner wife has filed a maintenance petition along with her three minor sons in the Family Court. In the said petition the Judge had fixed the maintenance of Rs.1,000/- p.m. for petitioner wife, Rs.500/- p.m. to each petitioner sons and Rs.800/- costs. Petitioner husband who is appearing in person has submitted that the respondent wife is now gainfully employed in the Municipal Corporation in the place of her father and one son is 2 residing with appellant since 05.08.2008. He challenged the order of Family Court Judge on the ground that the petitioner has deceived the Court by suppressing the fact of her employment with Corporation and also on the ground that the amount of maintenance is exorbitant. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent has submitted that the respondent wife got job in the Corporation since January 2006 i.e. after the date of judgment of the Family Court. She herself has filed pursis in the Family Court thereafter and informed the Court about her employment. It is submitted by the learned Counsel as she is employed, the petitioner wife does not claim any maintenance from her husband. Considering this development pending revision application, the following order is passed. This matter is finally disposed of at the stage of admission. Order of maintenance of Rs.500/- each to two sons i.e. Nikhil and Yogesh passed by the learned Family Court Judge is not disturbed. (a) Appellant to pay maintenance of Rs.500/- to respondent No.1 maintenance amount of son Hemant till 5th August, 2008. (b) Maintenance of Rs.1,000/- to be paid to respondent wife upto 1st January, 2006. (c) No change the order in respect of costs. 3 (d) Respondent No.1 wife is liberty to move the Court for maintenance if she loses the job. (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)