42 HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 5958 of2005 Petitioners !• 2. 4. 5. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28, 29. 30. Shri N. Subbax^o, aged 52 yeara S/o N,A. Shastd Q.No. A-52 R. Visheshar aged 60 years S/o R.R. Narayaii QrNo, A-54 Sitaram aged 61 years widow of V,Vishw8iisifham A-53 (A) V. Heinchaxiddiaarao (S,no. a to d) sons ofVishwaxiath (B) V. Vasudeorao rcsideat of9 of Q.No.53, kendrfya, (C) V. Udaibhan^ Kaxiaaichari Nagar, Sikolabhata, Durg (D)V.G.Giri P.L. Jaiswal S/o S.P.Jaisawal, Q.No. A-72 M. BhanmnurtiS/o Salyaoarayana aged 63 years Q.No. A-69 1. Smt S. LaxmiWidowofS.G.Rao 2. S.V.R. Murti S/o S.G.Rao 3. Smt. Y. ParvatiW/o Shri Niv^, Resadent ofQ.No. A-77 V.V. Shastry S/o V,Suiyaaaxayan Q,No. A-C-28 K. KameshwadW/o M.S.Sharma, Q.No. A- 91 S. Seturaman S/o Subramaaium R.C.Chourey S/o Chandraji CMoiircy Q.No.B-29 Bhojiaj Balchaad Bagde S/o Balchand Qagde, Q.No.B-1 R, Haxiharaei S/o Ramaswami, Q.No,Am81 V.K.Mukherjec, S/o B.B.Mukhcrtee, Q.N6.A- 83 C.H.Hanumantrao S/o Suiyaxiarayan Q.No.A-65 K-V.R.J.Rao, S/o K. Gopalam M.Y.Borekar S/o Yamaji BorelKU- Q.No.A-88 G.Salyarao S/o Ramarai, Q.No.B-36 Aoil Baajari S/o Babuxao Baxijari Q.No.55 D.M.Gajbhiye S/o Mahadeo Rao Q.No.B-6 R.M-Khobragade S/o Nagarao Khobragade Q.No.A-17 S. Dandasi Q.No.C-10 T.L. PSadmnkar S/o L.K. Padumkar Q.No. B-18 S.S-Thakur S/o U.S.Thakur Q.No.B-19 N.K. Sukhdeo S/o C. Sukhdeo Q.No.A-9 P. Jogarao Q.No.B-13 P.S.Thakur S/o D.S.Thakur Q.No.B-99 A.D.Ninave S/o D.P.Ninave Q.No.A-16 Majhar AU S/o Jafar Ali Q.No.A-60 M.S.Yadava S/o G.R.Yadava, Q.No.B-21 Rajni Bai Widow of Late Shri P.S. Tahkur, 43- (A) Rameshwar Singh S.No. (A) to (D) L.RS. ofShriP.S. Thakur (B) Vijaya Bhushan (C) Yashwaat Singh (D) Ku. NishaThakur 31. S.M. Ali S/o AkbarAU Q.No.C-17 32. Pritam Singh S/o Hakim Smgh Q.No.A-95 33. D.R. Sahu S/o Manaxam Sahu Q.No.B-48 34. R.N.Das S/o Chandrasekfaar das Q.No.B-48 35. K.K.Thakur S/o R.S. Thakur, Q.No.B-15 36. D.K. Mitra S/o B.S. Mitra Q.No.A-76 37. M.L.Gupta S/o B.L. Gupta Q.No.A-36 38. M.Z.Thakur S/o Jhmgaru Q.No.A- 11 39. C.U.Khaparde S/o Urkuda Q.No.C-1 40. A. Shri Raxnlu S/o EDdhhanna Q.No.0-40 41. H.C. Yadava S/o MiBan Yadava, Q.No.B-24 42. C.H. Murty S/o C.H. Kanasam Q.No.A-6 43. N.S. Sonak S/o Sukhlal Sonak Q.No.C-6 AU major resident ofkeiidriya karamchari Nagar,Sikola, Dwg. Versus Respondents 1. Prcsideat, Kendriya Kai^aachad Griha Nirman Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, Sikola, Durg (C.G.). 2. ShriA. P. Nandagawali, 3. Shri Ach)rut Rao, S.No,2 & 3, the fhea Directors, Kendriya Karamcbari Griha Nirman Sahakari Samiti Maiyadit, Sikola, Duig (C.G.). 4. Shri P.R. Naik, Additional Registrar, Co- opemtive Societies, Raipur (C.G.) Sln^le Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Justice 8. R. Nayak, C^. Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for ffae pefitioaers. Mrs. Renu Kocfaer, Advocate Ibr the Respondent No. l. 44 ORAL ORDER ( ^ December, 2005) The followmg order of fhe Court was passed by 8. R. Nayak, C^?. This writ petition is preferred seekiag iDterventibn of ^ie Court niaixily on fhe groiuid fhat fhe Additional Registrar of the Cooperative Socfety to whoni fhe contestmg private respondents hiave preferrcd aa appeal agaiast the order of fhe Joiat Registcar is not a competent aufhority to entertain appeal. The contention is not weU fouiided, Sub-clau^s (i^ of sub-section (1) ofSection 77 ofthe Clihatdsgarh Coopexative Societies Act, 1960 provides fhat aa appeal shall lie from evexy or^inal order passed under fhe Act or fhe Rules made thereunder, if such order is passed by Joint Registrar^ whefher or not mvested wifh fhe powei's of Registrar, to fhe Registrar or flie Additional Registear authorized by Registrar. It is not fhe case of tibie petitioner fhat the Additional Registrar was not aufhorized by fhe Registrar to entertadn fhe appeal prcferred against fhe oxder of fhe Joint Registear of fhe Cooperative Society. In that view of flie matter, the grouad urged belforc nie is merit-less. Though certaia offaer grounds are urged ixi support ofthe petitioa, fhere is no need for fhis Court to undertake fhe ^CTriew of those grounds because of the pendency of fhe appeal. Pireffy, fhe event fhe petitibner can ui^e ofher grounds before fhe appeBate aufhority. Secondty, if fhe order of ttte appellate auliiority goes ^amst fhe ^titioner, he can ui^e fhose gixxunds whfle assailing fhe said oxder before the appropriate fonuci. That liberty is reseryed to fhe petitioner. The writ petition is liiercfore dismi^d. No costs, Sd/- Chief Justice