IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7813 of 2011 Abdul Khalique S/o Late Shariff, R/o vill-Mehsoul, P.O. Mehasual, Dist. Sitamarhi. --- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Director, Consolidation, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Deputy Director, Consolidation, Sitamarhi. 4. The Consolidation Officer, Dumra, Sitamarhi. ---Respondents. For the petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Shrivastava, A.C. to G.P.4 ----------- 02 03.05.2011 Heard both sides. Petitioner seeks quashment of notice issued by the respondent Deputy Director, Consolidation, Sitamarhi in Appeal case no. 02 of 2011 (Annexure-3) whereby he has been called upon to appear in the said proceeding and make submissions on the point of admission. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that said appeal was filed under Section 10(6) of the Bihar Consolidation of Holding and Prevention of Fragmentation Act 1956 (for short the Act) beyond time. It is submitted that the order assailed in the said appeal was passed on 09.10.1980 whereas the appeal was lodged in the year 2011. It is contended that said respondent was not justified in putting him on notice to make submissions on the point of admission. Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, submits that the petitioner has only been noticed to appear and file reply and make submissions on the point of admission. All the issues including limitation can be raised before the said authority 2 which shall be considered in accordance with law. Agreeing with the submissions of learned counsel for the State, this Court is not inclined to invoke its extra ordinary writ jurisdiction in the matter to quash the notice. Petitioner would be at liberty to raise all the issues before the said Court which shall be considered in accordance with law. The application stands disposed of. Sym (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)