IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1359 of 2008 MD. ADALAT KHAN SON OF SARFUDDIN KHAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE; MILKI, P.S.- PIRO, DISTRICT- BHOJPUR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SAISTA KHATOON, DAUGHTER OF HASAN NAYEM KHAN 3. DANISH 4. NAWAJISH BOTH ARE MINOR AND THEY REPRESENTED THROUGH THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN i.e. MOTHER NAMELY SAISTA KHATOON. For the petitioner : Mr. S.A. Khan, Sr. Advocate. For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ----------- 2 21.07.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioner, who is husband, is aggrieved by the order dated 26.8.2008 passed in Maintenance Case no. 58 of 2005 whereby the wife and two sons have been allowed maintenance @ Rs. 1,000/- each. It appears that the petitioner filed written statement and admitted the status of O.Ps herein as wife and sons. No evidence was led on his behalf. The applicant wife adduced evidence in order to indicate that the total income of the petitioner (husband) is more than 30,000/-. Having appreciated the evidence available on record, learned Principal Judge, Family Court Rohtas at Sasaram has taken a very reasonable view and has allowed maintenance for a sum of Rs. 1,000/- to the wife and Rs. 1,000/- each to the two sons. I am of the view that the order passed by the learned Court below is just and proper and does not require any interference. 2 There is no merit in this application. It is accordingly dismissed. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )