'•ft3i" ^0?^< a C.S'< .•-./ IN THEHIGH COURT OP IL1DIGATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G4 W.¥iS),NQ_.,.^i.c'.S. PETTTIONEP. tA^ s^x c^" Vqay Kumeu' Malhotra, Aged ^ about 53 yea's, S/o lAte Shri Chandra Prakash 'E^Mh.otra at present v^orking as a Sub. Divisional Officer 'ater Resoui'ces, Sub Division 'KSBa6et,T3TsG;ict-Ja3hpui- .<;State of CJthattisgark throug-h theSecretary Vvater ^ 4. D.K-S. Bhawan Ra*pt.ir. Engineer in Chief, Resources Departmeni:, sihava Bhavyan District Raipur Chref Engiaeer, Water Resources Department, Hansdev Kachhar, 'Bilaspur District- Bilaspur Naresh Chandra Singhagt about 42 yeat's S/o Soverdhan Singh At present 'worKinK as a Sub Dtvisional Otiicer Watec, Resoyroes v—.fthfVlfSvOu-^_| . Sub Division Khte^iora. -6' Roi^kV-y OF THE CONSTITITTION OF 11NDIA FOJ UANCB OF WRFTS OF As stated afc'ove in the cause titie, XI-HC-78 <? <-flHt^l Sh*11^» 35T^Tpn^iq-, »Tny'ie,(si^i+iy .^,^f.^..Hl6s/06 ^; 3TI^?TMaw (yd^q^.g') 3n^T^rR-<i°h tRT3TI^Tsbt]i'»i STdTW trf?(T sn^T qirafcpfrT mtRff ir'tei^-^STRK ^isri^q'an^r &wid Mr. Vishnu Koshta, counsel 1 Mr. Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. At| on advance copy. Heard both the counsei. By the instant writ petition the petitioner has challenged his tr| passed by respondent No.1, v^her^ Kansabel to Gharghoda. Learned counsel for the pel| respondent No.4 submitted of their transfer 'orders. Learned cc] be allowed to make a representatiorj direcied to decide the same, to wh| respondents has no objection. Having heard learned coun^ and cireumstances of the case and of the case, the prayer made by !ea just, fair and reasonable. Therefor^ representation to respondent No.1 the instant writ petition and its and in turn, respondent No.1 is dir| one month from the date of its the petitioner in an objective mannei With the aforesaid direction, Consequently, M.(W.5P.No.; Parties are entit!ed for or the petitioner. Ivocate for the State/respondents No.1 to 3, tjnder Articie 226 of the Constitution of India, ^nsfer order dated 4-7-2006 (Annexure P-1) |by the petitioner has been transferred from ptioner submtts that the petitioner as well as represehtations with mutua] consent Tor cancellation (unsel further submits that the petifioner may to respondent No.1 and respondent No.1 be |'ch iearned-counsel appearing for the State/ ann^xures certifi^d )el for the parties, having regard to the facts [kVithout ^(pressing any opinion on the merits ('ned coitnse! for the petitioner appears to be the petitioner is allowed to make a detailed ]aising all his grievances, annexing a copy of within a period of ten days from today •^cted to decide the same within a period of ;4'ipt, considering all the grievances raised by |, on its own merits, in accordance with law. the writ petition stands disposed of. 3p34/2006 also stands disposed pf_ copy of this order. e.AI. L.C. Judge rec^ipt P.T.O. )*•