IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15318 of 2006 Bindhyachal Singh Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors For the Petitioner: Mr. Mahesh Prasad No. II, Advocate For the State: AC to GP 7 For Respondent No. 7: Mr. B.M.K. Sinha, Advocate … 4 10.08.2011 Petitioner seeks quashing of memo lno. 333 dated 14.08.2006, whereunder violation of certain terms and conditions have been indicated, however, time was granted to the petitioner to remove all the defects within 30 days, otherwise action for cancellation of the settlement of the lease for the remaining period was to be taken. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application to move before the authority concerned itself in response to Annexure 6 and raise all the points there itself which have been raised in this writ application. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. It is made clear that if such a response is filed within four weeks from today then the authority concerned shall consider the same and decide the issue 2 in accordance with law on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order within two months thereafter, if a final decision has already not been taken. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)