3 [3.r IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. No. /3^^72005' PETITIONER ^ ^wf/ .< ^'•/ -iV*'.' y ey f .y K/ '^y /^y  /' ^' JS»- Harinath Chandel, S/o. Heera Singh Chandel, Aged about 72 years, Retired Revemie Inspector, R/o. village Bijali Tahsil, Narayanpur, District Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDBNT ^<%^ ^1 ^tei^S^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S.Bhawan, RaipurfC G) 2. Accountant General, State of Chhattisgarh, Fafadih, Raipur-fC.G.) 3. Collector, District Bastar, Bastar (C.G). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ XI-HC-78 *tl*1«1^1T^ ^•cq-(<|<<|n<4,U>-(T|<(1<|S, (qwi'«y'< ,...^.-f.^J.3^^/€..W^ 200 sn^^i'RrR-ii* cCT3II^?Trii*li<h sn^?T ira^F (i^ciijisi^) 12/09/2005: - Mr. Vfmlesh Bajpai teune|d Mr. Panfcaj Shrivastava, ChhattisgartVrespondenls 1 andj Mr. R.S. Baghel, teamed Mr. K.K. Biswas, SetUo^ Raipur is present in person. Heard. counset fer tte petitioner. |eamed Panal Lawyer, for the State of 1|3. (wunsel for respondent No.2. Offlcer, Accountant Generai Offlce, bebn This writ petiUon has Constttution of India for issuanite pay GPF amount to the fajne] interest @ 18% perannum from| appear|ng retired Learned counsel petitioner was serving as respondent/State and he has 1991 as Revenue.tnspector, T^ihsil counset further submits that thel pestitioner titl date. appearfng Leamed counsel repty and stated that raspon(tent payment of Rs.51,103/- with respondenl No.2. Learned cotinsel saUsfied with Uie sa'id payment.| State Govemment. The Stalte <bl<lld41'l 11*<dl"^'fs'<l'(Rttci'( ^ail^qan^i . 1 fited under Articles 22K227 of the of a direction to the respondents to of Rs.72,891/- to the jwtitioner with July 1991 till the payment is made. for the petittoner submits that the a Revenue Inspector with the from service in tt»emonth of June Kanker, district Bastar. Learned GPF amount has not bsen paid to the for respondent No.2 has filed his No.2 has issued certificate for nterest on 20/04/2005 as due from appearing for the petilioner is The DPF amount isto be paid by the Govemment has calculated DPF XI-HC-78 *ii*i«ia»lTT^ vsvqtiwM<i,w\'Hf\s, Knmy M:f..ff.a.:.. an^CT'RrR'ii't) (iaiTan^ST(b*fi* fc, Ba-'N) !^ ^' .. °" ^ Y' 3Tr^$T'ra<p (yii^ei's) W^200 8TOI8R '!TfS?T aiI^CT -5-- amount from the year 1965-66 on the said amount interest @ 11% for the pertod 2000-2001, $ fte period 2002-2003 and 8% foh Rs.71,959/- has been paid .on petiUoner ftirther submlts that'M has been made wrongly. <*p Considering ths facte respondents 1 and 3 are directe( peUtioner wlth regard to the dedu^lon In view of the foregoing, th *14fdd1'141lfd)'ffls'^l •<["1<-%1< ^3lf^»T3II^?T to e date of retirement, thereafter 12% up to tQ99-20 an<i thereafter 1.5% for the ^eriod 2001-2002, 9% for • the period 2003-20(ffi. Atotalsumof 11/05Q005. Leamed counsel for the deductlon to ttie tune of Rs.13,000/- and circumstances of ttie case, 1 to consider the representafion d the made by respondents 1 and 3. a petiUon stands disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge