IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.166 of 2009 (S/B) Surendra Kumar Goel ………….. Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others …………. Respondents Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, A.C.J. Hon’ble Alok Singh, J. Heard Sri Sharad Sharma, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Jagdish Singh Bisht, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri. P. C. Bisht, the learned Brief Holder for the respondent nos.1 and 2 and Sri D. S. Patni, the learned counsel for the respondent nos. 3 and 4. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition praying that the downgraded entries for the period 2001 to 2006, which are mentioned at serial No. 5 to 13 in paragraph 2 of the writ petition, should be ignored for the purpose of considering his promotion to the post of Chief Engineer/Managing Director, which is likely to be held by the Departmental Promotion Committee. During the pendency of the writ petition, it has been stated that these entries have been communicated to the petitioner on 23rd September, 2009. In our view, once an entry is communicated, the petitioner has a remedy of making a representation, and, consequently, at this stage the Court is not inclined to interfere and dismisses the writ petition with the observation that in the event the petitioner makes a representation against the downgraded entries as indicated aforesaid, the authorities will consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order within six weeks from the date of making such a representation. (Alok Singh, J.) (Tarun Agarwala, ACJ) 12-10-2009 Bhaskar/LSR