Patna High Court LPA No.1414 of 2005 (18) dt.23-08-2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1414 of 2005 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 991 of 2004 ================================================== 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Secretary, Building Construction and Housing Department, Govt. of Bihar, Nirman Bhawan, Technical Secretariat, Patna 3. The Deputy Secretary, Building Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 4. The Engineer-in-Chief, Building Construction and Housing Department, Nirman Bhawan, Patna 5. The Chief Engineer (South) Building Construction and Housing Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 6. The Chief Engineer, (North), Building Construction and Housing Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 7. The Chief Engineer (Design), Building Construction and Housing Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 8. The Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna … Respondents/Appellants Versus 1. Raju Prasad, Son of late Jagdish Rai, resident of village- Holukpur, P.S.-Phulwari, district-Patna 2. Kanhaiya Lal, son of Sri Chandradip Rai, resident of Mohall- Bhikhachak, P.S.-Gardanibagh, District-Patna 3. Bishwanath Prasad, son of Lalkeshwar Prasad, resident of village-Mohammadpur, P.S.-Asthama,, Distirct- Nalanda(Biharsharif) 4. Ramesh Jha, son of late Sukhanandan Jha, resident of village- Pakri, P.S.-Riga, District-Sitamarhi 5. Kalika Prasad Yadav, son of Dasarath Prasad, resident of village-Mahuli, P.S.-Didarganj, District-Patna 6. Biralal, son of Bhageran Rai, resident of Terma Mangarpal, P.S.-Daryapur, District-Chapra 7. Baldev Sah, son of late Jaldhar Sao, resident of Village- Hariahi, P.S.-Sakun, District-Bhagalpur 8. Kapil Bhagat, son of Badri Bhagat, resident of village-Barihen Tola, Takiapur, P.S.-Dhanarua, District-patna .. Petitioners/Respondents ================================================== 18 23-08-2011 The present appeal has been filed against the order dated Patna High Court LPA No.1414 of 2005 (18) dt.23-08-2011 15.03.2005 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 991 of 2004. When the matter come up for hearing, the learned Sr. counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that a resolution in this regard has been issued by the State Government on 17.03.2008. The said resolution has been brought on record by way of counter affidavit filed by respondents on 11.02.2011 annexing as Annexure-A. It has also been submitted by learned Sr. Counsel that a decision has been taken by a high level Committee of the State Government to consider the cases of the respondents and for issuance of letters of appointments to them. But however, we are not willing to go into the merits of such resolution as we are of the opinion that no cause of action survives in the present appeal in view of the aforesaid resolution dated 17.03.2011, issued by the State Govt. However, the learned Sr. Counsel sought liberty of this Court to avail the alternative remedy available to the respondents, if they are aggrieved by non- implementation of such resolution dated 17.03.2011. Such liberty is granted. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed having become infructuous. ASHWINI /- (T. Meena Kumari, J) (Vikash Jain, J)