RSA No.2298 of 2009 Surinder Singh Vs. Amrik Singh and another Present: Mr.Amrik Singh Virk, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.A.K.Khunger, Advocate, for respondent No.1. *** After some arguments, the dispute between the parties had been narrowed down. Learned counsel for the appellant has asserted that he has neither encroached the land of the respondent No.1 nor he has any interest in rectangle No.9/10/2, 11/1, 20 and 21. He is only aggrieved against the fact that without any discussion, the suit for mesne profit has also been decreed. Learned counsel for the respondent, on the other hand, states that the respondent is not interested in recovering any mesne profits but is only interested in recovering the possession of his land. In view of this fact that the only grouse of the learned counsel for the appellant was made with regard to mesne profits, this appeal is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous with the clarification that the respondent has given up the claim for mesne profits. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE April 29, 2010 sukhpreet