IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.49 of 2008 SHASHID RAJA KHAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 4.12.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. In the instant writ application the petitioner has prayed for making further investigation in Laheria Sarai P.S. Case No.220/06 under section 173(8) of Cr.P.C. He states that the D.I.G., Darbhanga, in his supervision report dated 21.11.2006 has observed that Supervising Officer has found that the offence is not made out against the petitioner. It would appear from the report of the D.I.G., Darbhanga Range, that he gave direction for further report in respect of the involvement of Saket Singh. Thereafter a petition was filed before the C.J.M., Darbhanga, for making further investigation in respect of accused, Saket Singh and Mira Devi. The learned Magistrate allowed the application by order dated 4.1.2007. Learned counsel submits that on further investigation the case was not found true against the accused Saket Singh and Meera Devi and final report was submitted, accordingly. Learned Magistrate has accepted the final report. The grievance of the petitioner is that though allegation against him was not found true by one of the supervising officers still no further investigation has been made in his case. The aforesaid prayer cannot be granted as the D.I.G.,Darbhanga in para 4 2 of his aforesaid report dated 21.11.2006 has sated that a sum of Rs.34,450/- was seized from him but on enquiry only Rs.17,000/- was found to be genuine. The D.I.G. enquired about whereabouts of the aforesaid Rs.17,000/-. It would be open to the petitioner to pursue his remedy under the law. With the aforesaid observation this writ application is disposed of. Anilksinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)