1 SSK/56 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8674 OF 2009 Sou. Anusuyabai Tukaram Gurule & Anr. ....Petitioners Versus Manisha Surendra Patil (Gurule) & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. Sachin Gite, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. A. R. Kapadnis, Advocate for the Respondents. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 30th MARCH, 2010. P.C.: The learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that the Petitioners be permitted to have access of Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 on first and third Sundays of each month in the premises of District Court, Nashik, for the period of 2 hours commencing from 10.00 a.m.. 2. The learned Counsel for the Respondents have no objection, if the impugned order is substituted by permitting the Petitioners to have access of Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 for two hours, as requested. 2 In view of the above, I am disposing of the writ petition by substituting the impugned order with the following order : “ The Petitioners are permitted to see Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 on first and third Sundays of each month in the premises of District Court Compound at Nashik for a period of two hours commencing from 10.00 a.m..” (R. V. MORE, J.)