THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.755 of 2011 DT.24.01.2011 Between: K.Hayathunnissa Begum … Petitioner And The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its District Collector, Y.S.R.District, Kadapa and others … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri V.R.Reddy Kovvori Counsel for respondents: AGP for Civil Supplies The Court made the following ORDER: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to set aside order, dated 01.07.2010, of respondent No.2, whereby he has placed the petitioner’s fair price shop authorization in respect of Shop No.98, Chemmumiahpet under suspension. At the hearing, Sri V.R.Reddy Kovvori, learned counsel for the petitioner, stated that respondent No.2 has resorted to suspending the petitioner’s authorization on vague and flimsy grounds. He further submitted that though his client has submitted her explanation as far back as 25.07.2010, no final order has been passed so far. Since the enquiry into the charges levelled against the petitioner is pending, I do not find it appropriate to pronounce on the nature of the charges, on which, the petitioner’s authorization was suspended. Since more than six months had elapsed from the time of suspension of the petitioner’s authorization, it is not a fit case for interference at this stage. However, I find justification in the grievance of the petitioner that though she has filed her explanation nearly six months back, respondent No.2 has not completed the enquiry and passed a final order. Therefore, respondent No.2 is directed to pass a final order, after completing the enquiry, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioner. Subject to the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.924 of 2011 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) Date: 24.01.2011 VGB