( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2836 OF 1999 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 239 OF 1994 M.S.R.T.C. through its Divisional Controller, Nanded APPLICANT VERSUS Shri Balaji Devasthan RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. Manoj Shinde, advocate holding for Mr. M.K. Goyanka, advocate for the applicants/Intervenor. Mr. S.D. Kaldate, A.G.P. for the State. Mr. P.V. Mandlik, Senior Counsel, for the original respondent. ..... [CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.] [DATE : 18th March, 2010] PER COURT : 1. This application is moved in first appeal No. 239/1994. The applicant – Intervenor has urged to allow to intervene as M.S.R.T.C. - applicant has taken over the property, for construction of bus stand and any enhancement or interference in the award will naturally ( 2 ) be to the prejudice and detriment to the Intervenor. In the situation, the intervention application allowed. The appellant to carry out necessary amendment in the proceedings. The counsel for the M.S.R.T.C. waives notice in the cross-appeal/objection (Stamp) No. 12887/1994 moved by original claimant and also in the appeal of the State. 2. At the request of learned counsel for M.S.R.T.C., by way of last chance, S.O. to 24th March, 2010 for hearing on appeal and cross-appeal/objection. [ K.U. CHANDIWAL ] JUDGE NPJ/ca2836-99