H1GWCOURTQFSHHATTIS6ARHATBILASPUR Sinate Bench : Hon'bleShri Satlsh K. Aanihotri. J, Petitioners •< ^, Respondents Writ Petition (S.l No.3358of 2008 1. Radhe Lal Dewangan, age about 53 years, U.D.T., S/o Shri Latel Ram Dewangan, Govt, Hr. Sec. School, Gharbhata, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 2. Jhadu Ram Sonwani, aged about 52 years. Headmaster, S/o Shri Jeetram Sonwani, Govt. Middle School Chipurpal, Block Chtndgarh, Distt. Dantewada 3. Dhanlram Nfshad, age about 51 years, Headmaster, S/o Shri Binda Ram Nishad, Govt. Middle Schoot Pedapara, Block Chindgarh, Distt Dantewada 4. Shyamu Lal Sao,Ageabout56years, U.D.T., S/o Shri Jailal Prasad Sao, Govt. Hr. Sec. SchoolGhotiya, Block DoundiDisttDurg(C.G.) 5. Jeevan Lal Sahu, age aboutSI yeare, U.D.T-, S/q Shri Mojl Rarn Sahu, Govt. High Baranwapara, BlockPalari, Distt Raipur(C.G.) 6. Krishna Kumar Sahu, ageabout 48 years, Headmaster, S/o Shri Vishram Sahu, Govt. Navin Middle School Chiurvada, Block Chindgarh, Distt. Dantewada 7. Shatrughan Prasad Sahu, age about 48 years, Asstt. Teacher, S/o Shri Hari Lal Sahu, Govt. Girls Middle Schooj Navapara, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) Jagbandhu Tandi, age about 47 years, Headmaster, S/o Shri Bhikhari Tandi, Govt. Primary School Sahajpani, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tribal and Educatlon Department, D.K.S.Bhawan; Raipur --(e.Gj ~ ; / . 2. Distt. Education Officer, RaJpur/Mahasamund/Dantewada/ Rajnandgaon/Durg (C.G.) 3. Treasury, Account & Rension, Raipur, Distt.Raipur(C.(S^ Writ£etitiojiujiderArtic|e226ottheC^nsUtutionof1ndia 8. Vereus 1. -•2-— ••^. Present: Shri Somkant Verma, counsel for the petitioners. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Sipvernment Advocate for the State/respondents. ORALORDER - (Passed on this 1 day of July, 2008) With the consent of teamed counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is heard fmally. (2) Learned counsel appearing tor the petitioners submits that the petitioners were appointed as Deputy Teacher on a fixed pay of Rs.100/- in the year 1976, 1979 and 1983. After comptetion of probation period, the petitionerswere granted regular pay-scale. He further submits that the issue involved in the case is as to whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay-scale with effect from the date of initial apppintment or after completion of probation period. Learned counsel further submits that the issue involved in this case issquarely covered by a decision ofthe Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunat, Jabalpur passed in Original Application No.2745/1989 {Madhukant Yadu andWothers vs. State of M.P. and offwrs), wherein it was held that similariysituated teachersare entitled to regular pay- scale with effect from the date of initial appointment. (3) The matter was taken-up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal in Madhukant Yadu and 56others vs. State of M.P. andothers (supra). (4) In view of the afciove submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in thesame w 1 -3 Sopal terms, i.e., the petitioners are granted liberty to make a representation, if so advised, to consider their cases, if they stand on thesame footings, as per the order dated 24-08-1992 passed by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in Original Appljcation No.2745/1989 (Madhukant Yadit and 56 othersvs. State of M.P. and others) (supra) and subsequently confirmed by the order dated 03-01- 1994 passed bythe Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Cjvil) No.6892/1993 and grant relief accordingly. (5) In view of the foregoing, the petition is disposed of. No orderas tocosts. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge ^