WP(C) 4335/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIMA HAZARIKA Amitava Roy, J 02.09.2011 Heard Mr. P Bora, learned counsel for the appellant and Ms. Goyal, learned Gover nment Advocate, Assam. The petitioner is before this Court alleging harassment by the police of the Dis pur Police Station. In compliance of the order dated 26.08.2011, the learned Sta te Counsel has produced written instructions, which, in substance, disclose that the petitioner is wanted in connection with the investigation of Dispur P.S. Ca se No.1217/2011. The instructions in details justifying the requirement of inter rogation of the petitioner need not be recorded in the instant order. Suffice it to mention that on the basis thereof, we are satisfied that the police in the c ourse of investigation of the aforementioned case ought to be permitted to inter rogate the petitioner. In the above view of the matter, the petition is closed. It is, however, made cl ear that the investigating agency in conducting the investigation of Dispur P.S. Case No. 1217/2011 and in particular dealing with the petitioner would scrupulo usly follow the procedure prescribed by law.