1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHRATTISGARH: BILSPUR .r’ y a? 2% “7R1T PETITION NO. k\Z/QF 01 WRIT PETETIGN UNDER ARTICLE 226$?! OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1N THE NATURE OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION Am arnath Agrawal S/o Ram avtar Agrawal Agad about 30 yearg, occupatian Journalist R/o KaSabad Road Korba DiStrict Kerba (Chhattisgarh) V/S RESPONDENTS; The State of Chh'attisgarh through The ChiofSecretary, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) The State 0f Chhattisgarh through the Secretary Electricity Department Secratariat, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) a? .t’y The Chairman, Chhattisgarh Electricitv Board Degania,‘Raipur (Chhéttiégarh3 4. The Secretary, Chhattisgarh Electricity Bo ard, Daganiya, RaipurAqChhattisgarh) (Petiti'on in {he nature afPublic Interwt Litigation under Article 22§f22”i ofthe Canstitutian of India for igguance 0f an appropriata writ directiarr andfor order} «\W’I E/ i\ 2x V9. a i ‘ ' ‘ _ H, unw“anm£mm Ftjgg 24/;/2c01 ' ’ /: 1 J ,Smt.~s. Ahuja,‘3learned counsel for the petitioner. . ‘ Dr} .K. Shukla, learned Dy A G for State.' Learned ccunsel for the petitioner seeks to w1thdraw the petltlon with liberty to reagltate the Lgsue, if k occasion arises ., ' The petition is dismissed with liberty ix afore-’ said but it is made clear that the liberty is granted [Simply relating to the filing of the petition only and lfk‘if s\uch’ a petition is filed it would be heard by the V ,Court on its own merits. The amount of security deposited \ e l .h Wee ”meee ma -r l y @ ‘ mmm#i ‘ L