IISSLE BEiiCH )w( '^-^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.l c&) WRIT PETITION NO.-2 B 1 '7-/2006 PETITIONER /' Shivnath Ram, aged about 51 years, son of Shri Muratram ...•• occupation Semce, presenfly ^ b /••'' /••"" ^v ..^\i>...-'^ ..••• working as Revenue Inspector, /'1 -••'*^^X>^ Revenue Ciicle No.l, Ambikapur, ...•••'.^^?'-'" Distt. Surguja (C.G.) ^,^y '<?•-' ^A-- RESPONDENTS /-' VERSUS ^l. The State of Chhattisgarh, fhrougli - the Secretary, Departnient of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) , 2. The Depufy Secretary, Departm.ent of Revemie, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Cosim.is&i.oner (Land Records), Raipur (C.G.) 4. The CoUector, Distt. Surguja (C.G.J WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTiCLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT / WRITS, ORDER / ORDERS, DIRECTION / DIRECTIONS ETC. ^^-^^l^ SBE'a A. G. Bn,ARPHi; •w ^ . BttASPQB XI-HC-78 ^rRt^TshtTTqi 3^ '^i^Ki'ii, aiTnu'is, Rtciitfy AT-.y.F....^.'.?'/^., ^ 200 gn^?r q^ra? (yit^q^) 3:n^T^>rf?:iR; (CTSTI^Tat^iqi 's w Bawe ^ ^ a3 ?^IWfl1?tT3TI^T 4.8.2006:- Shri Bhaskar Payashi, couns|el for the petitioner. Miss Deepali Pandey, P.L. fpr the State/respondents, on advance copy. Heard both thecounsel. By this petition, the petitiorfer has chaltenged his transfer order dated 7-7-2006 whereby he has tjeen transferred from Revenue Circle Ambikapur, District Surguja to Tehs| Learned counsel for the petj petitioner has been transferred vt'thin the district of Surguja but the petitioner has been transferred in request, the petitioner was transfe again been transferred to Tehsil petitioner, to which learned counsel] the facts and circumstances of th^ decide the representation made b^ period of 30 days from the date of r^ceipt of copy of this order. With the direction aforesaid, Consequently, M.(W.)P. No. Parties are entitled for certifi^d copy of this order. tiiiTn'fl-i *llldTiffeiA<.Fit+^l<, ^aiRliTan^T |1 Kusmi, District Surguja. poner submitted that even though the Tehsil Kusmi where he has already worked for 6 years.and on accoui|)t of threat given by the Naxalites the petitioner had sought transfer fr(>m Tehsil Kusmi. Considering his red toAmbikapur. The petitioner has Kusmi vide impugned order. The petitioner has made a representati^n to the respondent No.1, therefore, respondent No.1 be directed to d^cide the representation made by the for respondents has no objection. Having heard learned couns|el for the parties and having regard to case, respondent No.1 is directed to the petitioner on 22-7-2006 within a |the petition stands disposed of. P976/2006 also stands disposed of. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge P.T.O.