^- p ftl'll^l ;• C ii ^.i" Bivisioa Bs IN THE HISH COOKE OF JUDIC&IOBE KE BIIASPOR (C.6 WSXV BE'ET'riON N0. 3i'^~(\ /2005 ^ EEII2XONER VERSOS D.S. Rajput, S/o. late Shri S.N. Rajput, Aged about 42 years, R/o. Shop No. 21, Sector 7, Bhilai, District Durg SC.G) BESPONDEIN'S ^s^ ^y/ ^^/ 9?%^ '7xy< y^oy ^^?-' .^^f. / "^" *&" 3. State of Cbbattisgarh, Through its Secretary, Food s Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection Department, Maatralaya, D.K.S.Bhawan,Raipur(C.G) Joint Director, Food S Civil Supplies, Govt. of Chbattisgarfa, Raipur (C.G.) Collector, Durg (C.G.) Food Controller, Durg (C.G.) m -' 1—'"?&^ WKfS EETITICN UNDER aifl'ICI.E 226/227 OF TBGE CCaiSIITO'IION OF INDI& FOR ISSTOWCE OF laUT IH •EHE isKcasE ar cESXiasasKt, MKKDBMOS, EROHIBITIOH SKD FOR QIHER SUIiaBLE WRII OR WRI'ES, QRDER OR Om®RS^ DXKECTION OR DBBECTIONS ETC. XI-HC-78 g^Et "Ul.yiri'y, yTTl'i-i'id, Rrti'<-iy>! W-P' 2-S-'77 31T^9TV (^g°IS) SlI^STqilf^lftp ?TaiTSIT^T(pin< ^RtTSR^rf^T SII^ST cf>|q[rt<'TiT1 HFT^t' ^f'^S^ ^fvR=5T:? ^)3lf^PT31I^n DB:Hon'ble Shri A.K.Patnaik. C.J Hon'ble Shri Sunil Kumar Sinlha. J. 24.6.2005 Heard Mrs. Fouzia Mirqaj and Shri P.S. Koshy, Depuly'-jfl Chliattisgarh. Thc petttioner was No.61, Maroda Tank, Blulai, aUeged irregularities, the Foo^. aBotment offhe said Fair F'rice teamed cotmsel for fhe petitioner Advocate General for the State of aUocjated order dated 03.03.2005. Aggnc]ved appeal before fhe Joiut Directoi), Chltatdsgarh, Raipur aad by Director, Food and Civil Suppli^s, DTU^ to consider fhe appeal pi^ferred CoUector, Dui^ has disudssed tljie dated 11.5.2005 on thc groui^d a Fair Prioe Shop at Ward Ipistt. Duig. On accouat of sosae Conteolter, Durg, cancelled the ihop aUocated to thc petitioner vide 1, the petitioner iiutiaUy filed an Food and Civil Su^)lies, Govt. of loider dated 14.3.2005 fhe Joant , issued direction to the CoUector by the petitioner. But the appcal ofthe petitioner by order fhat under the Circular dated 14.8.2003 issued by the Foo<f Protection Department, Gov^ Govenunent and not fhe CoUectil & Civfl- Suppfy and Consum.er of Chliattte^rh, the State >r is tfae appellate autttority. XI-HC-78 3'5ET ^ioirt^, yfll'i^id, Rrti'(-iy'< 31T^?T q?cp (ijclf^el^) 3TI^aTtIil1^.:li<l) =2TTOT^?Tg;Wf? ?F?IT»R'Trf^tT SII^CT 2-~ <CT!lfri><?l-l ^IHdT^'f^t'ifutWt-i ^aTf^T31I^?T . dated 11.5.2005 ofthe Collector, it petition under Article 226 of the A^rieved by the said ord^r Duig, thc petitioner filed this wi|it Constitution. We fiiid on a reading aSfS^e CiTcular dated 14.8.2003 issued by the Food & Civfl Sup^ilies and Consumer Protection Department, copy of which circiilar was issued when th4 pi|oduced Sarvajaiuk Nagarik Purti Vitarai^ the meauwlule fhe before us, fhat fhe said Chliattfsgarfa (Khadya Padarih) Schenie 2001 was ia fi>rce but ia Chhattis^arh (Niyantran) Adesh 2004 {Chhat|is! (Contro^ Order 2004, has coxac of Deceinber 2004. A realingj Chhattisgarh Public Distributi^n woi-ild show that any persoa desigaated officer for allotmeat| niay appeal to the CoBector wiftlin of the order and aay person CoBector may appcal to the receipt of the order and the decijsic be final. A readiag of Claus^ Sarvajanik Vitaraa Pranali latjisgarh PubMc Distributioa System ^nto foroe by notifcatbn dated 12dl of Clause 18(2) of fhe afcwesaid System (Coatrol) Order 2004 aj^rieved by aa order passcd by fhe or canceUation of fair price shop ift|in 30 days fi'om the date ofreceipt is a^rievcd by the order of the wifhiu 30 days of fhe date of jsion of the State Goverameiit shatl wb.0 Sljate 21 of fhe Chliattisgarh PubUc ^ ^Bsr^qraiWT, y-al'<-ii!'s, fsirtit-iy 3Ti^sTtra^(^gsR; 3Ii^9T?>T!ci-lith aanan^STSpTirai ?WfTM^Trfi?I3:[I^SI iprefe^i TTCTt'^'fetQ'^SRc! ^sri^Tan^n Qrder Distribution Systeni (Control) Chliatdsgarh (Khadya Padarth] Scheine 2001 has been resciru(ed. Govenunent is no longer the passed by fhe designated offic^ Collector is ftie appellate auth^rity designated ofBcer for canceUatioja 18.2 of the Chhattisgarh Pubpic Order 2004. Further the last 2004, furfher shcws tfaat the Sarvajaiiik.Nagarik F>urti Vitaran The result is that fhe State ippeUate authorily cwer ttie order other than the CoUector aad fhe over fhe oider passed by the of Fair Price Shop as per Clause |ic Distribution Systeia (Control) blause 21 of the said ordcr 2004 providcs that notwifhstandiag the said Scheme 2001 shaU be s^ich repeal, aay order issued under deenied to have niade graated or issued under the ClLhattisg^rh PubUc Distribution Systeni (Contro^ Order 2004. Hence the order dated O; ,3.2005 (Anaexure P-6) ^ssed by the Food ControUer, Durg wouli^ be deeined to be an order passed j under fhe Chhattisgarh Public pistribution System (Control) Order 2004 aad could be chaUenged )aef6re fhe CoUector by way of aa |appeal under Clause 18.2 of fl^e said order 2004. Thc CoUector jDiirg, therefore, was not legally|r^ht in conung to the conclusion SP/FS.'2005~2e-.000' XI-HC-78 ^rBT -^i-yirt«,yTilf-i'KS, Rrti'<-ty< *tW^i ^^TT^ 3IT^3T iRtp (4cl?jcl«ri) an^STcfiTf^riq? ?T!>IT3nt?TiI;qFR <l)lil{d41-1 HFRTt' iffecS >!R>l'!-dl<' ^53lRftl3II^9T f'^A-O that fhe order passed could| Ctovenuucnt aad not before Tiim| be chaUcDged before tfae State For the aforesaid reas^us, the unpi^ned order dated 11.5.2005 passed by ffae CoU|ector, Dvxg, is quashed aad thc CoUector, Duig is directed to h|ear the appeal on merits and pass &esh oiriers in accordancc wit^i law. This direction be coinpUed withia 2 monfh.s fix>xn thc date ^fieceipt ofthe certified copy ofthe order by the CoUector. C.C. as perrules. Sd/- CIiiefJustice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge ..-> & f.