n, reassed ayéhis‘’ 1 2”“ Eat; er February, 2on9} Chai§ehge in this Writ petiiioe is r0 the decisran of ihe committee dared 452- 8-20008 (Amexure W2), whereby the respondent Ne.21’Committee Observed that the enirres made by the office of the Accountam Genera£ in the recorde of GRF of the petiiioner, are correct. 2) Learned counsei appearing for rhe petitioner submits that the petitioner white working as Lecturer retired from services on 30-4-20e3. On the retirement %%EGH CEUR? {3F CHH£§T§$$£RE 3ILA$PGR Wr§€ §at§iien i$§ Na. §21 a? 295$ Pezi‘iioner Duraa Prasad Pandev. Sic. Late Shri 8.5. Panzley, aged about 57 years, Retired Leciurer, Gcvemment Higher Secandary Schoo!, Manendragarh, District Kor§ya (CG). Verszm Respondems 3. iate'c: Chhaiiisgar’n, :hrough ‘the Secretary, Department of Higher Education, DKS $hawan, Mantra§aya, RaEpu? {CG}. 2. Camrniitee canstiimed fo:' redressing the grievances (retifm dues} 0f the retired emgioyees, threu§?‘; its éhaii‘manlSecmtary, Degan’meni of Finaace, $taie of Chhamsgam. Rai‘gudCG)‘. 3‘ Acccuntani Generai Siaie 0f Chha‘iiisgarh. Raigmy {CG} :3. Senior Accaunts Gffmer 4‘35. off§ce of the Accountant Generai, Staie cf Chhamsgarh; Ra§pw<CG). 5. ?rinci;3ai, Govemmem Higher Secaedaw Schoei, Manendragayh, District Kor§ya (C3). {Wri‘i Pei§i§on under Articie 22$ of Const§$utien of 3ndia} $3: Han’bie Mr. Satisiw K. Agni‘nctri, J. Freseni: Mr. BE}. Guru, ceuasei for the getitiener. ’ Mr. Rakesh Jha, Pane§Lawyer fer the 8mm. Ms. Sharmiia Singhai, Asst $oiic§tw Genera: for Union of india. §§¥AL GRDER @ em, amcunt of Rs. 93:24‘7f- was siafidmz: as baiance in ihe GPF ascouni exciudirlg interest. Afia his retirement! by iei‘ie.’ dated 2‘—1€-2OG3 the Sr. Accounts Officer informed the netitioner that an amount of Rs53i551- was found as omstanding baiance. in response to the said ief'ier, the pe’iitimer suhmitted his repiy on 26-1 2-2063 staiing that ai’ :he dues we.'e cieared by mm befm'e his s’eiii'ement. On 30-4-2084. a ae’t’xer of recoverv for amount of Rs. 1,70.178i-. was issued to ’the pe‘d‘iionea’. i0 whieh a§so pet§t§ener féied his repw on ”Ii-2004. When the fuii and nnai- paymeni was not made to E’ne petitioner, ine petitioner preferred a writ petition, being Writ Petition No. 453$ of 2004, Wiiion was disposed of by tnis court ‘oy order dated 3149068 {Annexure PIE} with a direction to the eecond respondenticommittee to consider the case of the petitioner and oass abprooria‘te order. in accordance with iaw. Thereaf'ter‘ the second respondent/committee. without coneidering the entries made in the duoiicate GPF oass book. ‘nas taken the decision atiimino the eariier recovew order issued by the office of the Accountant General. 3) i have heard iearned counsei for the petitioner, perused the pieadings and documents apoended thereto. 4i) it is found that in the pass-book retained and maintained by the petttioner it entries were not made by the Drawing and Disbursing Ofdcer. After reoonoitino the said entries with the record or' the {)ttice of the Aocountant Generai. the amount is shown as Rs. -’t .4€,456i- Thus. the reiiet ciaimed for in this petition was not sustai abie. The verification of the accounts have been done by the senior officers. who constituted the second responden‘iicornrnittee to consider the cases or‘ the retirai benedts. t have not found any irreguiari‘tv'. The entries shown in the pass-hook maintained by the petttioner cannot be taken as a finai word. There has to be reoonciiiation with the accounts maintained hy the ofnoe of the Accountant Generat and in enquiry it was found that certain entries \ \ p r \ \ \\ of Withdrawai were missing in the pass—hook of the petitioner. Thus. the a‘ecision dated 12-6-2608 (Annexure W2) taken by the Committee is jusi and proper, warranting no inierference. 5) Accordinaiw the petition is dismissed. 7/ Raju a"§“ 3 . plgd‘w‘“ /: /r, “dge / S