1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 5857 of 2011 Decided on: 4.8.2011 Pritham Dev ....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & another …Respondents The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Mehar Chand, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner claims the benefit of ad hoc service followed by regular service for the purpose of pension and increments. According to the petitioner, the issue is covered in his favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in LPA No.36 of 2010, Sita Ram vs. State H.P, decided on 15.7.2010. 2. Learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. Petitioner submits that he would file an appropriate 2 representation furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for him to do so. 3. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents concerned to examine the matter, after verifying the facts, in the light of the judgment, referred to above and take appropriate action thereon, within a period of four months from the date of the production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copy of the judgment, referred to above. 4. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. August 04, 2011 (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (sck/hl) Judge.