CLCON No. 48 of 2009 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. Heard Sri H.M. Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Kailash Tiwari, learned Standing counsel for the State. By way of this contempt petition under Section 12 of the Contempt of Court Act, the petitioner has prayed to punish the respondents for flouting the order dated 15.02.2008 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 21-A (S/S) of 2003, Kunwar Singh Gosain Vs Chief Conservator of Forest & others. The operative portion of the Court’s order reads as under:- “In view of the facts and circumstances narrated above, respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with the provision of Rule22 of the Fundamental Rules and pay him salary according. However, this order will not be taken into consideration for stopping the petitioner form taking work of higher post.” The counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents and in para 7 of the same has clearly stated that the case of the petitioner was considered and passed a detail speaking order No. 2571/29-3(3) dated 01.04.2009 by which the claim of the petitioner was rejected. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner at great length as well as perusing the judgment and order passed by this Court, I am of the view that at this stage, there is no need to summon the respondents under the Contempt of Court Act. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as going through the impugned order, I do not find any ground to summon the respondent to show cause. I do not find any contempt of court in this case. Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed. Notices issued against the respondents are hereby discharged. However, the petitioner may seek the redress of his grievance by way of other alternative remedy available to him. (B.C.K., J.) 19.06.2009 ASWAL