iR^LK IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.1 WRITPETmON N0.54^?72005 PETITIONER ^'..y ^^•n.'s'^ ^•s^ ::-:;^y. RESPONDENTS ^ Sanjay Kumar Rai Son of Shri Dharmprakash Rai, aged aboiit 34 years, Shiksha Karmi Grade- 3, Primary Sehool Touli, Tahsil Marwahl, District Bilaspur^C.G.j VERSUS ! 1 1, State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Department ofSchbol EdKicrftion, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Raipur (C.G.). Bhawan ^ 2. 5. */^^^»^\ Janpad Panchayat Marwahi, Through: The Chief Executlvc Officer, Marwahi, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 1 The Additional Collector, Pendra Road, District Bilaspur (C.G.). The District Education Officer, Education District Bilaspur (C.G,). The Zila Panchayat Bilaspur, Through: The Chief Execullvr Officer, Zila Panchayat Bilaspur (C.G.). I Y 'WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN TMENATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE ORDER/ORDERS. DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS. HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISOARH : BILASPUR Wnt£etitionNo, 5425 o£2005 Petitioner Saajay Kiunar Rai Versus Respondents State of CUhattisgarh & ofhers (Writ Petition underArdde 226/227 ofthe Constitution oflndia) (SB: Hon'bte ShriSatish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri P. P. Sahu. Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N. N. Roy, Panel Lawyer for the respondeats/State. O RD B R (orall ( Passed on fhis 9th day ofMarch, 2010) 1. 2. 3. Heard. Leamed counsel appeanng for fhe petitioner submits that in view ofthe averments inade by thc respondents/State in paia 6 ofthe retum filed in W.P. No. 5414/2005 (Vinod Kumar Rai Vs. State of Chliattisgarh & otheis), fhe reliefsought for ia this writ petition has atoeady been graated. Thus, nothing reinains for adjudication. Leamed counsel appeanng for the respondents/Slate docs not controvert the above subimssion made by leamed coiinsel appearing for the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as ha.viag beconie mfl-uctuous. No order asto costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Thakur