IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI TUESDAY, THE 9TH DECEMBER 2008 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 32772 of 2008(B) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- K.ABDUL WAHAB, S/O.K.CHERIYAKOYA, KAVARATTI, LAKSHADWEEP. BY ADV. SRI.T.RAVIKUMAR SMT.AMBILI.G. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE ADMINISTRATOR, LAKSHADWEEP, KAVARATTI ISLAND. 2. THE COLLECTOR, LAKSHADWEEP, KAVARATTI ISLAND. 3. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (HQ), LAKSHADWEEP, KAVARATTI ISLAND. 4. SAYEDPOO, VELOD, KAVARATTI. 5. AYNAPURA MAVIYA, S/O.LATE ABOOBACKER, KAVARATTI. ADV. SRI.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, SC FOR LAKSHADWEEPFOR R1 TO R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/12/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V. GIRI, J. ------------------------------- WP(C).NO. 32772 of 2008 --------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of December, 2008 JUDGMENT Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the Administrator. The petitioner challenges the very maintainability of Ext.P3 and the delay in considering his objection Ext.P4. Mr.S.Radhakrishnan, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the review petition shall be heard and disposed of without further delay, at any rate, within six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the Collector to consider and pass orders on the review petition. The Collector shall consider the issue regarding maintainability at the first instance and specifically enter a finding in that regard in the course of disposal of review petition. This shall be done within six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. V. GIRI, JUDGE. pmn/ WPC.35244 /2008 2