CRIMINAL MISCELLANIOUS NO. 37553 OF 2006 ********* (In the matter of an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ) ******* 1. REENA GUPTA @ AAISHA PRABEEN, WIFE OF WASIM AHMAD 2. WASIM AHMAD, SON OF LATE MD. IBRAHIM, BOTH RESIDENT OF MOHALLA ISLAMPUR DOMA POKHAR, POLICE STATION MUZAFFARPUR TOWN, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR ……………………………………………………………….… ….PETITIONERS VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. VIKASH KUMAR, SON OF LATE BHOLA NATH KAILASHI, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA KAPARAUL ROAD WARD NO. 13, POLICE STATION SITAMARHI, DISTRICT SITAMARHI ……………………………….………… ……………………….……..OPPOSITE PARTIES ********** FOR THE PETITIONERS :- MRS. PREMSHEELA PANDEY, ADVOCATE FOR O.P. NO. 2 :- MR. ASHOK KUMAR MISHRA, ADVOCATE FOR THE STATE :- MR. RAJEEV LOCHAN, AC TO GA 5 MR. JHARKHAND UPADHYAY, A.P.P. ******* P R E S E N T HON’BLE JUSTICE SMT. SHEEMA ALI KHAN O R D E R Sheema Ali Khan, J. The petitioners have come to this Court for quashing of the Complaint Case No. C 632 of 2002/ Trial No. 721 of 2006 under Sections 420, 495, 406, 479 & 504 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. The petitioner no. 1 is married to petitioner no. 2 and both of them are living happily for several years now. It appears that a case was instituted by the father of Reena Gupta against the petitioner no. 2 2 alleging that the petitioner no. 2 had kidnapped Reena Gupta. The girl was recovered and after recovery, she was released and was given liberty to live with her husband-petitioner no. 2. The case failed. Thereafter, the present case has been filed being Complaint Case No. C 632 of 2002. In the present complaint case, the allegation is that the petitioner no. 1 was married with Opposite Party No. 2 and in the life time of her husband, she has remarried petitioner no. 2. 3. Counsel for the parties submits before this Court that they do not want to proceed any further in this matter. In fact, Opposite Party No. 2 Vikash Kumar has subsequently stated in the Court, during trial that he has compromised the matter and he does not wish to proceed in the case. It has also been stated that he subsequently divorced Reena Gupta. In effect, the evidence would give a go-bye to the entire prosecution case. 4. In the facts aforesaid, I think it would be proper for the Trial Court to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order keeping in mind that all the three parties are happily married and living their lives independently. 3 5. This application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions. ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. ) PATNA HIGH COURT DATED, THE 19th APRIL, 2011 N.A.F.R./ANAND