1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Misc. Civil Application No.1104 of 2007 (Arbitration) (Mohan s/o Tikamdas Lalwani v. Union of India and others) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Shri Nitin Jachak, Advocate for Applicant. Shri P.S. Lambat, Advocate for Non-Applicants. CORAM : R.C. Chavan, J. DATE : 6th April, 2009 The learned counsel for the non-applicant/Railways states that the General Manager had not at all received the dispute under Clause 63 of the General Conditions of Contract. He states that the notice dated 9-10-2006, whereby such statement was sought had not been received by the office of Central Railway and one M.K. Agrawal had informed him to this effect by letter annexed at Annexure R-I. However, taking the letter to have been received now from the record of this application, the General Manager shall decide the dispute within 120 days as is contemplated under Clause 63 of the General Conditions of Contract. In view of this, the learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the application. Leave granted. 2 The application is disposed of as withdrawn. Judge. Pdl.