IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 4TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 15TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 3657 of 2011(F) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- KOCHUMOHAMMED. M.K., PROPRIETOR, M/S.FLORA TILES, MENILAKATH HOUSE, PUTHENTHODU, THALIKULAM.P.O., THRISSUR-680 569. BY ADV. SRI.K.I.SAGEER IBRAHIM. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, DISTRICT OFFICE, THRISSUR-680 002. 2. THE MEMBER SECRETARY, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THALIKULAM PANCHAYATH, THALIKULAM.P.O., THRISSUR. PIN-680 569, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY. R1 & R2 BY SRI. M.K. CHANDRAMOHAN DAS, S.C, P.C.B. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/02/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 3657 of 2011 F ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 4th day of February, 2011 J U D G M E N T Heard both sides. 2. Petitioner has established a Small Scale Industrial Unit for the manufacture of floor tiles. According to the petitioner, an application was made to the first respondent for consent, inspection was conducted on 23-06-2010 and Ext.P5 order was issued, stating that they intend to reject the application for the reasons mentioned therein. It is stated that on receipt thereof, the inadequacies mentioned in Ext.P5 were rectified and Ext.P6 representation was made. It is complaining that there has not been any progress in the matter, this writ petition is filed. 3. If as stated by the petitioner, the inadequacies mentioned in Ext.P5 have been rectified, there is no reason why the Board shall not conducted a fresh inspection of the premises and consider the application of the petitioner for W.P.(C) No.3657/2011 : 2 : consent. 4. Therefore, I direct that on the production of a copy of this judgment, the first respondent will inspect the premises of the petitioner and if he is satisfied that the petitioner has provided facilities entitling him for the issuance of consent to operate his unit, his application for consent will be reconsidered and fresh orders will be passed thereon. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible on the production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge