IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2254 of 2006 TRILOKI NATH BAJPAYI Versus SMT.LILAWATI BAJPAI & ORS ----------- 5. 30.9.2008 Surendra/ Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court the impugned order does not call for any interference by this Court, especially when the prayer of the petitioner for disposal of the land to his share has been allowed. The grievance of the petitioner that his share will be more than 12 decimals could not have been gone into at this stage because whatever ultimately the share may turn out to be, that would definitely be accounted for in the final judgment. As a matter of fact the share of 12 decimals as recorded in the impugned order in the name of the petitioner is only because his counsel made a statement to this effect. That being so, the court below will definitely keep into account that ultimately the share will be depending on the final out come of the suit. Accordingly, this civil revision application is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.)