1 S.B. Civil writ petition No. 1478/2010 Smt. Khushali & Anr. Vs Hazi Manwar Ali & Ors. Date of Order 17.2.2010 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.Rakesh Arora,for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioners challenged the order dated 3.2.2010 in which the trial court recorded that the petitioners do not want to produce rebuttal evidence, therefore, the petitioner's rebuttal evidence was closed According to learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners never wished to close their rebuttal evidence and that can be gathered from the fact that on earlier occasion after getting opportunity to produce the rebuttal evidence, they submitted the affidavit in rebuttal, therefore, there could not have been any reason for petitioners to close their rebuttal evidence. It is also submitted that in case this court is not inclined to interfere in the order dated 3.2.2010, then the petitioners may be given liberty to file the review petition. It is settled law that a fact mentioned in the judgment or order what was stated before the court cannot be challenged straightway in appeal or in writ petition challenging the order and the proper remedy is to approach 2 the court concerned by moving appropriate application for review of the order. In view of the above reasons, I do not find any merit in the writ petition and so far as permission of the court for allowing the petitioners to submit the review application also cannot be granted because of the reason that nobody has prevented the petitioners from taking steps in accordance with law. Hence, the writ petition of the petitioner is dismissed. [PRAKASH TATIA], J. cpgoyal/-