THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI W.P.No.17566 of 2010 ORDER: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Eswaraiah) The petitioner seeks a Writ of Mandamus to declare the award, dated 10-03-2010, passed by the Lok Adalat Bench at Kurnool, in pre- litigation No.98/10, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently to declare the said award as null and void. In the said pre-litigation case, the 1st respondent herein is the petitioner and the 2nd respondent herein is the respondent. As both of them have compromised the matter, the award was passed on 10-03-2010. According to the said award, the 2nd respondent allotted plot No.179-A to the 1st respondent and the 2nd respondent has delivered possession of the said petition schedule property to the 1st respondent and the 1st respondent took possession of the same on 10-03-2010. The 2nd respondent expressed his no objection to execute regular sale deed in respect of the petition schedule property in favour of the 1st respondent. It is the case of the petitioner that though the award was passed on 10- 03-2007, he came to know about the said award in the first week of July, 2010, and according to him, he has purchased the said property under registered sale deed, dated 14-03-2008. In the instant case, it is the case of the petitioner that he has purchased plot bearing No.95B to an extent of 1320 sq. ft. from the 2nd respondent vide registered sale deed, dated 14-03-2008. It is stated that the property settled among the respondents is the same property purchased by the petitioner. According to the petitioner, though the settled property is same, but the boundaries are changed. Admittedly, the petitioner is not a party to the said award. We are not inclined to express any opinion as to whether the settled property is the same property said to have been purchased by the petitioner or not. Even, according to the petitioner, the property purchased by him is same, but the boundaries on the east and the north differ. As the petitioner is not a party to the said award, it cannot be said that the said award is binding on the petitioner. However, we are of the opinion that the petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies to protect his right and title in accordance with law before appropriate court. With the above direction, the writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J _______________ NOUSHAD ALI, J Date: 26-07-2010 Prv