IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 28TH JANUARY 2008 / 8TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 3069 of 2008(M) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------------- T.SANTHOSH KUMAR, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.T.V.THANKAPPA PANICKER, PANAYAPPALLYIL CC 12/932, THOPPUMPADY VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALLURUTHY POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALLURUTHY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. RAJESH, POLICE CONSTABLE, PALLURUTHY POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. SANTHOSH GEORGE, S/O.GEORGE, THATTAKATHU HOUSE, MARATHUMKARA VILLAGE AND DESOM, VADAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. R1 TO R3 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.MEERA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & K.M.JOSEPH, J. ------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.3069 of 2008 ------------------------------------------ Dated, this the 28th day of January, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu, C.J. In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents not to interfere in any civil dispute on the basis of Ext.P1 complaint filed by the 5th respondent or to cause harassment of the petitioner. 2. When the matter was posted before this Court on 25.1.2008, we had directed Smt.K.Meera, learned Senior Government Pleader, to get appropriate instructions from the respondents. 3. When the matter is posted again for admission today, learned Government Pleader produces a copy of the letter received by her from the Circle Inspector of Police, Palluruthy. 4. In paragraphs 4 and 5 of the statement, the Circle Inspector of Police, Palluruthy has stated as under: “4. As per this complaint I have summoned both parties and discussed the matter. Then I understood that the matter is purely civil in nature. I insisted the complainant Santhosh to approach civil court for getting remedy for this complaint. W.P.(C) No.3069 of 2008 2 5. No crime case has been registered against the petitioner in the above WPC and no intention to arrest him.” 5. Recording the statement made by the Circle Inspector of Police, Palluruthy, in our opinion, for the present we need not have to grant the reliefs sought for by the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. (H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE vns