./ ^ HIGH GOURT OF CHHAmSGARM : BII-ASPUR V^rTPETmQNCS^ N0,4094 OF 2009 PETITEONER ^ Navneet Aaditya Lader. ag^ about 56 years, S/a Late Shri M.L. Lader, Upper Divjsion Teacher, Primary Mlddie Schooi, Andhari Kachhar; Block ^Korba, Dtst. Korba(CG). Versus : RESPONDENTS 1. 2. 3. State ot' Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Triba! Welfere Department, DKS Bhawan, Ratpur(CG). Assjstant Commissioner, Tribal Weifare Department, Dist. Korba (CG). Bto^k Education Officer, Korba, Dist Korba (CG). (VVrit petition under Articje226 of ths Constitution of indja) Slngle Bench : Hon'bSe Shri Satish K, Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shrs K.S. Pawar, CQunseJ for the petjtioner. Shri Y.&. Thakur, Dy. Advocate Generatfor the State. ORDEReORAb (Passed on this 6th day of August, 2009) Heard Searned counset fbr the parties. 2. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submlte iat the petjtioner was appointed on a fixed pay scaSe of Rs.150^. completion of his probation, the petltioner was granted reguiar pay scaie. This Coyrt has considered the identicat issue in Paras Nath.Oypta v. State ©fChhattisgarh '&.-Qthers1, holdling that the petitioner therein, who was sirYiiiarly situated, be granted regular pay scale wifri effect from the date of inltJaS appolntment. Learned counsel further sybmits that the present case is squareiy covered by the decjsion ofthis Court in Paras Nath Gupta (supra)'and,' as such, the petitloner may be grantedl permlsslon to make representation before the respondent authoritSes. 3. Learned counse! appearing for the State submlts that in the event, a •representation is made, the same may be consldered and decided Sn accordance wlth iaw, cn Its own merits, within a period of foyr weeks from the date.of recelpt of the representation. 4, $n view of foregoing, accordlng to the tearned counsei for the petltioner, nothing sur^ives in this petitlon for adjudlcation. 5. AccordingEy, the writ petition is disposed of. ' VVP (S) No.58 of 2007 ('15-1-2007) Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge