1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR S.B. Cr. Misc. 3 rd Bail Application No.1395/2010 (Hari Prasad Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of Order : 11.03.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARI Mr.Dinesh Singh, for the petitioner. Mr.Laxman Meena, PP. By the Court: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there remains four witnesses yet to be examined, which is causing delay in the matter. It is stated that in the cross-case lodged by the petitioner, all the accused therein have been released on bail, thus looking to the aforesaid, petitioner may be enlarged on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor on the other hand submits that there is no change in the circumstances warranting acceptance of bail, thus bail application of the petitioner may be dismissed. After considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, which may effect the out come of the trial but looking to the facts available on record, I am not inclined to 2 accept this bail application and accordingly, the same is dismissed, as there exists no change in the circumstances warranting acceptance of third bail application. The trial Court is, however, expected to conclude the trial within the time framed, as it is stated that only four witnesses remain to be examined, thus four remaining witnesses be examined expeditiously and the trial may be concluded thereafter as quick as possible. (M.N. BHANDARI),J. Preety Item NO.S-23