OF A' !'U T.^ AF<V i'T'13 ? IX;WRIT (S) No. 2233 ^%7^.TT7"S^ tij^j Mahesh Kumar Bhagat, S/o. Mangal Das Bhagat, aged about 38 years, workine as Assistant Teacher, Go'iT. Primarv School, Semipali. Tehsi! Dharamiaiearh. District Raiearh •'iT^ y \ C^.U'.I. •^T'S'TJ^J^' VllKSLi 1. State of ChhattisgaA, tfarough lCUi Tribal n^i-f^rp- 't ¥'^il.d.i 'w Department,. Mantraiaya, D.K.S, . ^-^ ^"S *^fr^f T&* ^ Jf Dnav^aii^'Kaipur ^.u.). ^ •r~1-^ommissioner, Uepartment, Fandrt Kavisuankar University Camous. Raiour fC.G.) r" Assistaat Commissioner. uiba! We'fare Department, Raigarh, District Raisarfa ('C.G'.'i Shri Harish Kliuntiya, Advocate fbr tfae petiTione] Shri Arvind Dubey, Pansl Lawy'ei for the. State / resnoBdents. (Passed on 1 lul ofApril, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well &s fbr tlie State/re.spondents jointly submit tha't the fact and questioa of law involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in Yashwant Kumar Vs. [^^^•i^-?~,,£a-?° ^ LiiVMIC'I ^. j^'IP.JR-CG 96}, whieh has been disposed of vide order dated 03,04.2006. Leamed counsel annearina for the resDondents does not controvert the said submission. [n subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (S,) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Siiimir Venna. vs, The Stiite Govt, of Chhattisgtirit anofher') and other connected matters, decided bv thi.s Court on 15-12-2006. Dursuant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondar\' Educatioa, Bhopal and the prospectus of Diploma in Education Examination, it was clarified that the tiomenclature oftbe Basic Tmining Institiite, i.s., B.T.I. has been changed and renamed as Diploma in Education, i.e.. D.Ed, Accordinelv. the D.Ed, Cei'tificate holders are also c.overed bv the decision in Writ Petition (S.'i No.4130 of 200.5 (Gopesh Vemw vs. The Sia, Chhattisgarh and anolher) (Supra). 3. Accordm'gly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of tlie ordsr passed in the c.ase ofVashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Dm'g another (Supra), subiect to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired D.Ed. E.xamination Cemficate on his own exnenses as ner the circiilars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further whether he has been oaid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs, Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge Amrt