IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 166 of 2003 (M/B) 1. Prem Chand Mehra S/o Sh. Ilam Chand, R/o 382, West Amber Talab, Roorkee, District Haridwar, Uttaranchal State 2. Km. Nusrat Anjum d/o Mohd. Islam R/o 307, Mohallah Sati, Imli Road, Roorkee, Distt. Haridwar, Uttaranchal State ….. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Uttaranchal, through its Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of Uttaranchal, Secretariat, Dehradun, Uttaranchal. 2. Public Service Commission, Uttaranchal, through its Secretary, Ayog Bhawan, Gurukul Kangri, Kankhal, Haridwar, Uttaranchal ….. Respondents …….. Sri Khalil Ahmad, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri N.C.Gupta, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttaranchal. None for respondent no. 2. Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Sri Khalil Ahmad, learned counsel for the petitioners. Sri N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for respondent no. 1. None for respondent no. 2. 2. Khalil Ahmad, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition has now become infructuous. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 03.05.2006 03.05.2006 A