In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 2890 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: May 19, 2009 K.L. Bhatia and others .. Petitioners Vs. M.C. Amritsar and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. B.R. Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N. Jindal, J The case of the plaintiff is that the verandah is a part of the tenancy, whereas, the defendant has set up the case to the contrary and adds that it vests in the Municipal Corporation and it is a part of the public street. A specific issue to the effect “whether the plaintiffs are in possession of the verandah in question as tenants?” has already been framed. The parties knowing fully well about the pleadings and the issues arising out of those pleadings have led evidence in that regard. Now when the case of the plaintiff is covered by issue No.1, no further specific issue is required to be framed. Dismissed. May 19, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge