IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 2ND AUGUST 2011 / 11TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 20038 of 2010(D) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- TECIL CHEMICALS AND HYDRO POWER LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, M.G.VIJAYAN, CHINGAVANAM P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.K.JAJU BABU SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI SRI.T.S.SHYAM PRASANTH SRI.T.R.SADEESAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM.686 001. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, OLD CUSTOM HOUSE, MUMBAI- 400 093. 3. DHAR INDUSTRIES LTD., PLOT NO.2/679, BHAGIRATH PURA INDUSTRIAL AREA, INDOOR, MADHYAPRADESH REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY. 450 001. ** 4. M.P.MICRO @ SMALL ENTERPRISES FACILITATION COUNSEL, DIRECTORATE OF INDUSTRIES, M.P.VINDYAJAL BHAVAN, BHOPPAL- 450 002. (DELETED) ** R4 IS DELETED FROM PARTY ARRAY AS PER ORDER DTD. 4.8.2010. 5. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY MINISTRY OF INDUSTRIES, NEW DELHI 110 001. R3 BY ADV. SRI.C.UNNIKRISHNAN (KOLLAM) R4 & R5 BY ADV. SHRI.PHILIP MATHEW, CGC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss W.P.(C) NO. 20038/2010 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.20038 OF 2010 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner challenges an award passed by the Madhya Pradesh Micro and Small Scale Industries Facilitatiion Council. The award was sought to be enforced through revenue recovery proceedings for which the District Collector, Kottayam has been addressed. When it was pointed out that the District Collector, Kottayam is only an agent of the District Collector, Mumbai and no part of the cause of action has arisen in Kerala, the learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to approach the appropriate High Court. Permission is granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above liberty. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE acd