IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 9681 of 1993 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA Sd/- ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- HIMATSINH P. CHAUHAN Versus K.H. KOLI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 9681 of 1993 MR PM BHATT for Petitioner No. 1 MR MA KHARADI for Respondent No. 1 MS MANISHA LAVKUMAR AGP for Respondent No. 2-4 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA Date of decision: 22/04/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT There was a limited consensus among the learned counsel appearing on both sides that the interim order staying implementation of the impugned orders at Annexures-C and E, whereby the name of the respondent was required to be entered into the revenue records, should be confirmed till and subject to the decision of the Civil Court in Regular Suit No.102 of 1989 instituted by the respondent No.1 in the Court of learned Civil Judge (J.D.), Devgadh Baria. Accordingly, the order of interim relief dated 22.9.1993 is made absolute, the petition stands allowed to that extent and Rule is made absolute accordingly with no order as to costs. Sd/- ( D.H.Waghela,J.) (KMG Thilake)