IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-9207 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: November 22, 2011 Balkar Singh .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & another .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. None for respondent No.2. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. As per the office report, respondent No.2 refused to accept service. 2. This petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. challenges order dated 16.10.2010 (Annexure P-3) passed by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Pathankot, vide which application filed under Section 319 Cr.P.C. has been dismissed. Revision was carried which has also been dismissed vide order dated 3.1.2011 Crl. Misc. No. M-9207 of 2011 [2] (Annexure P-4). 3. Learned counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions from Sub Inspector Pritam Lal, states that trial has been concluded and the case is fixed for 12.12.2011 for orders. 4. In view of the stage of the case, learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the petition. 5. Dismissed as withdrawn. (AJAI LAMBA) November 22, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?