IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 1005 of 2008 Vikash Semwal. … Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others. … Respondents Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. H.C. Pujari, Addl. G.A. for respondent nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent no. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.C. Pujari, Addl. G.A. for respondent nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent no. 3. 2. Mr. H.C. Pujari, the learned Addl. G.A. submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioner, has become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case have submitted the chargesheet against the petitioner before the court concerned on 13.08.2008. This fact has been indicated in Para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Consequently, the Interim order dated 16.12.2008 stands vacated automatically. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 05.03.2009 V.K.