^ r'yrs ^S.-ES' ^<^»??^pr ^%'S? ^^'E31?^'^JT»'^t?^^^,"S?^s ^?? ASi3??^ €s£t?>/^U^.~1 ^ySf ^J'AlFtig.A'i i^^s'.es.^^s'l, @£i-f^.@SJU^. ^Wpssg^. ^S^A.g.A.g.,^^. JF©^1"t¥<"& WTIX 9fQ~€tKlv'S. 1^1 It6_^; •SV^fSv^fSi-X ,T&-M-S> S? S~Sif a.S. S. S-v^sSa^S^ f,.P. Patel, S./o Shri i.P. Paiel, Agert about 41 yeai's, Ooc-upajdou: Seivi.ee. Presently working as Vice Prmcipal in Go-verriTrient Multipurpose liigher Secondanr School. Sarauearh, r^4---*-~-^^. Ei'-s^"f-yT' ^tT~5iT'.^<-t--^<K~iT; J^-iyiAl'L;!. KcU.gcUll, '^•IJLiLi.ciiU.te^sA&ll. 1 State of CIiliattisgarh, Tlirough the Scurctcuy, Sfhool Education Denartinent, Manti-alaya, D.K.S. Blia.waii, Raipur, C]^liattisR;SLr]i. 3 Dii'ector, Public Iiistructioxis, Stsite of ClUiattisgaiiij Raipur, \j'nii^msg'sm. 3 Collector, Raj.gaj.'li, District; Raiga-rh, <^u.o.aiusgaiLu. 4 Distiict Educatiou Ofiicer, Raigaj:Ii, Disttict: Raigat'h, Clibattisgai'h. ?x'uiciDai. Uoveiiuiiexxt MiutiDiUDOsc nigiiei aeconci^iy scnooi; Sararigarh, nistrict: Raigarb, Chltattisgai'h. D,L. Jaisv/al, Ucti-u'er, Goaenimeiit Multipurpose Higher Secondaiy School, Sarangarh, District: Raigai-h, Chhattisgai-h. EWrit Petitlon under Article 326 of the Coiistltutloa of Indlal Aonearance: 'Ql---.-^ i?^^ Q1->T 1 -T-.-^ +1- fcinn h'ajeev onnvasrava; f'oiirisp-i Tor tne pRTiTinncr. Shri Ajay rhvivedi, Pauet i.awyer fii'r tliR Stete/respondents *J,-, Shri S.N. Naude, coiins>°1 thr i-RSixxideQt No.6- W.P.CS'sNn. 5106 of 2007 ^^@ *B ? . 3"6^? If' 1 ^^£%^SJl4 ^f^^SSt^ lo'y.is.aoo-?, Heard. At the veiy oiitset, leamcri cmarisel fi->r respoi-ident No.6 n'iakcs 11'iis statement that siibseqtient to filiug of hia iTetum dated 11.10.2007, onr Mr. S.N. panda 1ia$ alreadv ioineri as regiiilar Pnncipai .iu Govt. Miiltipi<n')osfs Higt^er Secondaiy Schoo], Sai'angarii and in VJRW of the ahnve siioseqiient developmfint, this petition tias I'endei-ed infTitCtnoTis. This stateTOent raade at har bv Shri S.N. Nanrte is takcn on record. In view of t.he abovc stateme'nt made by Sliri Nande, this writ. petition; whicfa was filed aga-inst the orrier dat.cri fi.8.2007 (Annexi]re-P/7); renders jnfnicfno^is because it was filert against the directjou of giving ctoargcs of Priiicipal by the nRtitioner to respondent No.6 in abscnce ofany rrgtilar Principal. Tn view of the anove developmRrit, this petition is disposed i~\~^ ?"1G~S'=' Sd/- Ssinij Kumar Sinha Judge v'S.ttl r ^