IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 28TH OCTOBER 2011 / 6TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 28789 of 2011(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. ASHAMS P.R., S/O.P.K.RAJAN, AGED 22, PULLORKUDIYIL HOUSE, SOUTH MARADY P.O., MUVATUPUZHA. 2. YEDU G. KARTHA, S/O.MOHANAN KARTHA, AGED 22, KANIKUDIYIL HOUSE, MEATHALA P.O., PERUMBAVOOR. BY ADV. SRI.K.R.VINOD RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM-686 001. 2. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM-686 001. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI. T.A. SHAJI, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- WP(C).No. 28789 of 2011(W) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1: A COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER FOR THE REVALUATION OF M.S.ACCESS (PART III). EXHIBIT P2: A COPY THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER FOR THE REVALUATION OF M.S.ACCESS (PART III). EXHIBIT P3: THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT ACKNOWLEDGING THE PAYMENT MADE BY THE 1ST PETITIONER FOR REVALUATION OF ANSWERS BOOKS. EXHIBIT P4: THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT ACKNOWLEDGING THE PAYMENT MADE BY THE 2ND PETITIONER FOR REVALUATION OF ANSWERS BOOKS. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mn ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 28789 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 28th day of October, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners are doing their B.Com Vocational Model II Degree Course. When the result of the 6th Semester examination was declared, petitioners failed in the subject “M.S. Access (Part III)”. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 6 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the University for compliance. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp //True Copy// PA to Judge