WP(C) 1509/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mrs. R.B. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. R. Gogoi, lea rned State Counsel appearing for the respondents. The grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that though pursuant to various work orders issued by the Executive Engineer, PHE Guwahati Circle, he completed the works with the satisfaction of all concerned and submitted the bi ll for an amount of Rs.18,48,119/-, an amount of Rs.7,70,404/- has only been pai d leaving the balance of Rs.10,77,715/- still due and payable to him. Though no affidavit-in-opposition has been filed, the learned State counsel appe aring for the respondents and also the learned counsel appearing for the petitio ner have submitted that the matter in issue have already been answered by a full Bench of this Court in Tamsher Ali -Vs- State of Assam & Ors. reported in (2008 ) 4 SCC 1 and as such, the present petition may be disposed of in terms of the d irections contained in the aforesaid judgment. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the partie s and upon perusal of the averments made, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondent No.2, Chief Engineer, PHE, Guwahati, to verify t he claim of the petitioner and in the event, upon such verification any amount i s found to be due and payable, the petitioner’s name is to be enlisted in the re gister required to be maintained. The amount, which is found to be due and paya ble thereafter, shall be paid to the petitioner in terms of his own turn. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.