HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.9507 OF 2007 ORDER: The petitioner on the one hand and the respondents 3 and 4 on the other, are neighbours are Sriramnagar, Mehdipatnam, Hydeabad. The petitioner submitted a complaint to the respondents 1 and 2 alleging that the respondents 3 and 4 made construction, in deviation of the sanctioned plan. His grievance is that no action has been taken thereon. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 and the learned counsel for the respondents 3 and 4. 3. The respondents 3 and 4 admitted that they have deviated from the sanctioned plan to meet their basic necessities. If the matter rested at that, it would have been possible for the respondents 1 and 2 to take action against deviations. It is, however, brought to the notice of this Court that on an application filed by the respondents 3 and 4 in terms of G.O.Ms. No.901, dated 31-12-2007, the deviated portion was regularized. If the petitioners feel that the regularization is not proper, they can prefer appeal before the competent authority. 4. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioners to pursue proceedings vis-à-vis the order of regularization passed in favour of the respondents 3 and 4. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J March 03, 2011. KTL