1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO. 1562 OF 2009 Sanjay Ram @ Ramu chavan .. Applicant Vs State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. V. V. Purwant, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs. P .P. Shinde, APP, for the Respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 24/06/2009 PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the respondent. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No. 452 of 2008 of Mohol Police Station, Dist-Solapur. The said crime has been registered against the applicant and one another for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under section 395 of IPC. 3. It is alleged that the present applicant and one another committed dacoity and robbed 600 meters of cloth. The incident T 2 was witnessed by two persons. Though in their statements they did not give detail description of the accused, they identified both the accused including the applicant in police lock-up as the persons who committed the offence. Mr. Purwant, learned counsel for the applicant vehemently stated that though it was possible for the prosecution to conduct test identification parade, they did not do so. He further submitted that the description of the property recovered at the instance of the preset applicant and of the stolen property do not match. He submitted that chargesheet has already been filed. There are no criminal antecedents at the credit of the applicant. Trial is likely to take long time. Keeping that in view and considering overall facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail on stringent conditions. Hence, the following order. Applicant Sanjay Ram @ Ramu Chavan is directed to be enlarged on bail in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties to make up the said amount, subject to the conditions that the applicant shall report to the concerned police station on every Wednesday and Saturday between 6 and 7 pm for a period of three months and thereafter on every Saturday between 6 and 7 pm till conclusion of the trial. While passing this order I shall not be understood to 3 have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. Application is disposed of. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)