Chandka 1 APPL-511-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL (L) NO. 511 OF 2010 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 110 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO. 11 OF 2010 Dhananjay S. Patil & Ors. ..Appellants versus M/s. Universal Builders & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Chandra Naik for Appellants. Mr. S. P. Bharti for Respondent No. 1. Mr. I. A. Siddiqui for Respondent No. 2. Mr. H. C. Pimple with Mr. R. Y. Sirsekar for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4. CORAM : DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. 07 February 2011. P.C. : Upon the delay being condoned, the Appeal is taken on board by consent and is called out for hearing. 2. The Appeal arises out of an ad interim order dated 22 April 2010 of a learned Single Judge. While declining to grant ad interim relief the learned Single Judge has in paragraph 5 of the impugned order noted that though the Chandka 2 APPL-511-10 Plaintiffs had knowledge since January 2009, they had moved the Court only in November 2009 and the application for ad interim relief was being heard in April 2010. The order of the learned Single Judge declining ad interim relief has been passed nearly ten months ago and the Court is informed that the Notice of Motion is to appear for hearing and final disposal before the learned Single Judge, today. In view of the above, we do not consider it appropriate to interfere with the ad interim order which in any event is founded on cogent reasons. The Appeal is dismissed. All the rights and contentions of the parties in the Motion are kept open. (Dr. D. Y. Chandrachud, J.) (Anoop V. Mohta, J.)