THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU and THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR Dated: 28-12-2010 WRIT APPEAL Nos. 1154 AND 1156 OF 2010 WRIT APPEAL No. 1154 OF 2010 Between: Government Medical College & Hospital, Rajiv Gandhi Insititute of Medical Sciences, Kadapa, rep., by its Director ... APPELLANT AND Kamineni Chakrapani and two others …RESPONDENTS WRIT APPEAL No. 1156 OF 2010 Between: The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Director of Medical Education, Koti, Hyderabad and another ... APPELLANTS AND Kota Gangadhara Reddy and another …RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU and THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL Nos. 1154 AND 1156 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Nisar Ahmad Kakru) These two appeals arise out of a common order, therefore taken up together for disposal. The controversy owes its origin to the allegation of involvement of the writ petitioners – respondents in unfair means and malpractices, giving rise to the registration of a criminal case and the investigation clinched in presentation of a charge sheet against the writ petitioners before the competent Court of jurisdiction which became basis for suspension of their admission to the MBBS/MS Courses. The order is challenged by medium of a writ petition and the writ Court, upon consideration of the matter, stayed the operation of the impugned suspension and same was made absolute by an order dated 26-11-2010, inter alia on the ground that in case the writ petitioners are acquitted, no order can compensate the irreparable loss the impugned order of suspension would subject them to. We are prima facie in agreement with the view taken by the learned single Judge. The learned single Judge has given several other reasons those prevailed on him in staying the order of suspension but do not call for any deliberation at this stage because the reason spelt out by him indicated hereinabove in the given facts of the case is sufficient for grant of the stay of the impugned order of suspension. Dismissed. VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, CJ 28-12-2010 K. Shyleshi