IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32807 of 2010 MAHEBUL HAQUE Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 26.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission is that parties are agnate from the common ancestor at inimical relation for partition of ancestral property. Theft is ornamental and alleged assault does not justifying consideration of any offence under Section 307 for refusal of anticipatory bail. Taking that into consideration, prayer of the petitioner for bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order in connection with Balrampur P.S. Case No.42 of 2010 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar subject to conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. PN ( Mandhata Singh, J.)