WP(C) 3239/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTIC B P KATAKEY Heard Mr DC Kath Hazarika, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr G Soren, l earned state counsel appearing for the respondents. The grievance raised in this petition is that though the petitioner no.1 filed a FIR on 12.11.2010 and on the basis of which the Murajhar PS case no.214 /2010 was registered and the petitioner no.2 filed another one on 13.12.2010 and on the basis of which the Murajhar PS case no.234/2010 was registered, no prope r investigation has been initiated till date. In the backdrop of above assertion of the petitioner, this Court by the order dated 29th June 2011 directed the learned state counsel, Mr G Soren, to ob tain necessary instruction as to the stage of such investigation. Learned state counsel, on the basis of a written instruction received, h as submitted that even before filing of this writ petition, the charge-sheet in Murajhar PS case no.214/2010 had been submitted on 29.4.2011 and that the invest igation in Murajhar PS case no.234/2010 is now going on and likely to be complet ed soon. Since, investigation in Murajhar PS case no.214/ 2010 had been completed and the charge-sheet been filed even before the petitioner approached this Cour t without making necessary enquiry and investigation in Murajhar PS case no.234/ 2011 is going on, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Officer-i n-Charge of Murajhar PS to complete the investigation in Murajhar PS case no.234 / 2011 and to submit a report in its final form as required under Section 173 of Code of Criminal Procedure within a reasonable period of time. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. The copy of the written instruction dated 17th July 2011, as produced by the learned state counsel, is kept on record.