1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty First day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.14078 of 2011 ANTIGAMANI @ BALASUBRAMANIAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.7 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SANKARANKOVIL POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT CR NO. 592/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. A.UTHAYAKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR. K.S. DURAI PANDIAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is the seventh accused in Crime No.592 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for offences under Sections 147, 148, 294(b) and 307 IPC. The alleged occurrence was on 25.09.2011 and he was arrested on 28.09.2011. He has come forward with this petition seeking bail. 2.According to the prosecution, in respect of the conduct of the festival, there was a meeting held, in which, there arose quarrel and as a result of the same, it is stated that the other accused attacked the de- facto complainant with deadly weapons. Insofar as the petitioner is concerned, he was neither armed with weapons nor he attacked any of the victim on the spot. The only allegation is that he did not prevent the other accused from attacking the de-facto complainant. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would deny the above allegations. According to him, the petitioner has got nothing to do with the alleged attack made on the de-facto complainant by the other accused. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital. 5.Having regard to the fact that the petitioner was neither armed with any weapons nor attacked the de-facto complainant and also considering the allegation that he did not prevent the other accused indulging in crime, besides the fact that he has been in jail from 28.09.2011 onwards, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, but with stringent conditions. 6.In the result, this petition is ordered and bail is granted to the petitioner on the following conditions:- i)The petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Sankarankovil; and ii)The petitioner shall remain at Tirunelveli and report before the Tirunelveli Taluk Police Station, everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. sd/- 21/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SANKARANKOVIL 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI 3 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, SUB JAIL, SANKARANKOVIL 4 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, TIRUNELVELI TALUK POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI 5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SANKARANKOVIL POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 6 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. A.UTHAYAKUMAR Advocate SR.No.36684 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14078 of 2011 Date :21/10/2011 TR :21.10.2011: 2p/8c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/