1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7570 OF 2008. IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1420 OF 2008. APPELLANT: JUTENDRA S/O WASUDEORAO HARODE. -VERSUS- RESPONDENTS: DHARAMDAS MELUMAL RAMANI AND OTHERS. ------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's Orders. Shri B. G. Kulkarni, Advocate for the appellant. Shri H. Dangre, Advocate for R-1 & 2. Shri N. M. Sudame, Advocate for R-3. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND F.M. REIS, JJ. DATED : 10/09/2009. Heard. This Court has already granted status quo. The contention is that the deceased father had executed a Power of Attorney in favour of Respondent no.1, who on the basis of that document 2 executed the sale deed in favour of the present Respondent no.21. After 3 years of said transaction, the only son filed the suit challenging the said transaction contending that after the death of his father irrevocable power attorney could not have been used. In the circumstances, as the appeal is admitted, we continue the interim order. However, the appellant should file Private Paper Book by 31 st December 2009 and appeal be listed for final hearing in the last week of January 2010. JUDGE JUDGE /Muley/