IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30835 of 2010 SHEKHAR SINGH @ PAPPU SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 12.01.2011 Heard. The Sessions Judge’s order indicates that as many as 21 criminal cases had been registered against the petitioner. It was not denied that half a dozen cases were still pending in different courts under various offences. As regards the present facts, those relate to recovery of certain parts of the arms and ammunitions of various categories during the execution of the process under Sections 82 and 83 of the Cr.P.C. Considering the back drop of criminality which adorns this petitioner, the court still did not inclined to grant bail to him but considering that he has remained in custody since 26.7.2009 and that the witnesses are yet to be examined for the production of whom processes have been issued by the trial court, it is directed that the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in Narhat P.S.Case No.2 of 2006, G.R.No.43 2 of 2006 with the following conditions:- (1)That the petitioner shall not attempt to intimidate/threaten the witnesses of any of the cases in which he figures as an accused including the present one. (2)That any further report of indulging in any criminal act which could be disruptive of the law and order situation or which could be detrimental to the freedom of any one and the court below being satisfied, prima-facie, about the allegations shall assume that this court had not passed the present order and shall take steps for committing the petitioner to custody. (3)The petitioner shall remain physically present on all dates in the present case before the trial court even if there is no likelihood of any development to be made by the trial court. Even a single absence shall be sufficient to mandate his committal to custody. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha,J.)