IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3210 of 2011 ASHOK YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. ----------- 2 27.1.2011 The point on which the petitioner seeks quashing of the order of framing charge, i.e., F.I.R indicating the date of occurrence which was different from that stated by the witnesses, is a matter which could be gone into only during the evidence of the witnesses including that of the Investigating Officer. This contradiction or error which could be found by the Court below could be considered only after evidence of P.Ws. In my opinion, it could not be a ground upon which an order directing framing of charge could be quashed. The petition appears on merits. It is accordingly dismissed. Prakash ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)