X»THE !HIGH COURT OF CHH7VTTISGARH AT BI LASPUR ll^i.^lari.t Petition,No.)3>5C>/2005 SSiSw.:,-::, :1 • . :': .- : .' 1 • RjBiSttl^ETITIONER BSIKSt?; ., ^sf^QS"'^.. \.-' ,' '": 'i'^^^^^ sara3.sst' T:absi1 feiil^':;:'^^^ CN,^ fl0( SINg^E Khel Kumari, tf/o Shrl Tularam, aged : Aiput 22 years, .R/o Vil-lage- * • • •• - ' •• . ' ' .'-•';;.• Sanakpat, Village Panchaxat- & Block.V Pandari, Districit- Kawardha (Kabirdt-iam) (C.G.). ' Versus- : . • I :1. State o£ Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, yomen K Chlid Development Department, Mantralaya, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.qt i/' 2. Collector, 'Zi"'7^'- Kawardha. (Katoirdham).^, 'ySt^""^ 3. Chie-f Executive Gfficer, Janpad' Panchayat, Panclaria, District- Kawardha(Kabirdhamj / 4. -Pariyoj na Adhikan, —— tfomen & Child Bevelopment, Pandarla, Di.strlet- Kawardha. ^'5. Smt. SaritaBai, . »/o Shri. KFisKRa Kumar, Agect 'about^24 yaars, R/Q. ;Sankpat,B.S. .Pandar.ta, . BlocJt-'Pandaria, ^District-; Kawardha'. (G.G.). • : ; PETITISON ; UNDER '.'AB'I'IGIiE ; : 2:26/227 . ^ OF BKS::iGi®STJ TION;LGE';.INDI^,,t;E'QR;,.rSS^ SitiieepTIORKRI,^iMSN.DAHUS I.OR';'aNY:KQT:HBR. •WRllT: iOR[ gIjgSeTION DQ^ 3USTIt:E;' IM;: THE MATTEB^ THE. fSPw XI-HC-78 HTOcrr a»*iich 3^ '<<l<llc1'i<, »Tf1'M'll»,(qclltiy ^.r'.tss-o/ V^ 200 5~^ 3ii^iwo ('itt^iyr) sn^rqn'R^i* . OTT 311^1 !*)t)i+ Soma TOTRK wfer W^T 4-7-2006 Mr. H.S. Ahluwalia, counsel Mr. A.S. Kachhawaha, fiovt.il •f|or the pstitioner. ^dvocate for the State/respondents Nb.l, 2 <&4. Mr. PankajShrivastava, Heard. ^ Learned counsel for the pej revisibn petition filed by the petilf pending before the Director, revision wos filed before the transferred to the Director, directed to decide the revision. The prayer made by learnetj reasonable, as the revision is the Director, Panchayat, is direct^ after hearin9 the parties, in within a period of three months, order. The uvrit petition stands dis^i In view of this order, M[ 6870/2005 <&1620/2006 stand, Parties are entitled for c< courjsel for respondent No.3. st>rar<i<ni *ii'<ci)'ffteIA<Ri«i< ^Tsri^ira.ii^r ritioner, at the outset, submitted that the petiljioner a9ainst the order of the Collector is Panc|iayat. He also submitted thot earlier the Cofljimissioner, Raipur and the same has been Panch^iyat. Therefore, the Director, Panchcyat be counsel for the petitioner is just, fair and pen^ing since 2002 i.e. four years. Therefore, id to dispose of the said r'evision petition with law, at the earliest, if possible, frorn the date of receipt of a copy of this accoryance disf^osed of. ,[(W.)P.No.l049/2005, I.A.Nos.Z542/2005, disbosed of. ert(fied copy of this order-. sdl- L.C.Bhadoo judge