IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.M. No. 21587-588 CII of 2009 & CR No. 5187 of 2009 Date of Decision: 10.9.2009 Baldev Krishan ....Petitioner. Versus Bank of India and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Ms. Sangeeta Dubey, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. C.M. Nos. 21587-588-CII of 2009 Allowed as prayed for. C.R. No. 5187 of 2009 Petitioner-defendant No.1 has approached this Court by way of instant revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugning the order dated 2.9.2009 whereby the trial court has closed his evidence by order of the court. It needs special mention that the trial court on an earlier occasion vide order dated 2.6.2009 had closed the evidence of the defendant-petitioner and the said order was impugned by him before this Court by way of Civil Revision No. 3862 of 2009. On 15.7.2009, the counsel for the petitioner had made a statement that one opportunity may be granted to the defendant-petitioner to lead his entire evidence at C.R. No. 5187 of 2009 -2- his own risk and responsibility and subject to payment of costs. The said revision petition was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 15.7.2009 and one opportunity was granted to the defendant-petitioner to lead his entire evidence at his own risk and responsibility and subject to payment of Rs.3000/- to the respondents as costs. The petitioner has failed to adhere to the aforesaid statement made through his counsel in this Court as he did not conclude his evidence on the date fixed by the trial court for this purpose in terms of the order dated 15.7.2009. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and In view of the above back-drop, no ground to exercise its jurisdiction by this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is made out. Dismissed. September 10, 2009 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE