IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.424 OF 2006. FIRST APPEAL NO.424 OF 2006. FIRST APPEAL NO.424 OF 2006. Lalchand Sumangal Vishwkarma & anr. ... Appellants. Versus. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. ... Respondents. Shri M.R.Yadav for the Appellants. None for the Respondents. CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED : 27th MARCH, 2006. DATED : 27th MARCH, 2006. DATED : 27th MARCH, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The Appeal was specifically fixed today at 3.00 p.m. to enable the Advocate appearing for the Respondent Corporation to produce evidence to show that the order passed under section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 was served on the Appellant. On the last date time was granted for the same purpose. Today none appears for the Respondents. 2. Admit. 3. Printing is dispensed with. The Appellant is directed to file private paper book along with sufficient number of copies thereof within a period of six months from today. If the paper book is not filed within the stipulated period, the Appeal will stand dismissed for want of prosecution without further reference to the Court. : 2 : : 2 : : 2 : 4. In addition to service through Court, the Advocate for the Appellant is directed to serve private notice to the Respondents by Registered Post A.D. and/or Speed Post A.D. and/or by hand delivery. Hamdast allowed. Judge. Judge. Judge.