IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1664 of 1985 Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- ASHMABEN FIDAHUSSAIN Versus SUMERMAL DASANI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MD PANDYA for Petitioners MR AC GANDHI for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT Date of decision: 25/02/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. Mr. M.D. Pandya, learned counsel for the petitioners states that he was informed by learned counsel for the respondents that the property in dispute has been demolished and possession thereof has been handed over by the concerned respondents to the present petitioners. 2. Obviously, therefore, the present revision would not survive and is accordingly disposed of. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Liberty to apply in case of difficulty. ******