IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10397 of 2001 RAJESHWAR PRASAD & ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 04/ 16.9.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. None appears for the private Respondent no.6, although notice has been served on him. 2. Petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 2.5.2001, passed by the Director, Consolidation, Bihar, Patna, as contained in Annexure-1 to this writ application, whereunder learned Director set aside the orders passed by the Deputy Director and the Consolidation Officer and thereby held that the purchase made by the petitioners under sale deed dated 4.5.1983 will have no effect as the said sale deed has been executed by Suresh Prasad ignoring the sale deed executed by his brothers and transaction made by his father, Satyadeo Prasad in the light of the power of attorney executed by Suresh Prasad dated 22.5.1967 in favour of his father on the basis of which father executed the mortgage deed and agreement to sale in favour of Urmila Verma, mother of private Respondent no.6. 3. I do not see any illegality in the order dated 2.5.2001, passed by the Director, Consolidation, Bihar, Patna, as contained in Annexure-1 to this writ application and this writ application is dismissed. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)