- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5189/2009 Arun Bhatu Patil. ...Petitioner.. Versus The State of Maharashtra & others. ...Respondents... ..... Shri G.J. Dahad, Advocate for petitioner. Shri V.H. Dighe, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3. ..... CORAM: P.V. HARDAS & A.V. POTDAR, JJ. DATE: 10.08.2009 PER COURT: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by which the petitioner prays for quashing and setting aside the order of termination of the petitioner dated 22.6.2009 issued by the Deputy Director, Land Records, Nasik Division, Nasik. In the light of the said fact, the petitioner has alternative remedy available to him in law of filing appropriate application before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. In - 2 - the light of that, therefore, this petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy available in law. In the circumstances, there will be no order as to costs. (A.V. Potdar, J.) (P.V. Hardas, J.) ndk/c1080917