ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4635 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 4635 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 4635 OF 2007 IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO. 1801 OF APPEAL NO. 1801 OF APPEAL NO. 1801 OF 2007 2007 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. B. Unnikrishnan for the applicant. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 21st September, 2007. : 21st September, 2007. : 21st September, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. On 7th September, 2007 at the request of respondent No.2, who appeared in person, the matter was adjourned for two weeks. On 13th September, 2007 another application No. 4692 of 2007 has been filed by the applicant for interim relief. Respondent No.2, appeared in person on that day also. Time was sought for reply. By consent the matter was adjourned to 21st September, 2007. ( 2 ) 2. Now, today respondent No.2 not appeared in morning session as well as in second session. There is no reply filed on record. 3. Considering the averments made in para 2 and 3, a sufficient cause has been shown to condone the delay. The delay is condoned. The prayer clauses (a) and (b) is granted accordingly. 4. The civil application is disposed of, accordingly. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]