IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 14TH JANUARY 2010 / 24TH POUSHA 1931 RPFC.No. 130 of 2007() ---------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN MC.15/2006 of FAMILY COURT KASARAGOD .................... REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------------------------------------- SIDHIQUE,S/O.ALI,KURANATH HOUSE, CHOLAKULAM P.O MELATTUR,MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN SRI.K.S.RAJESH RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS/PETTIONERS: -------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. P.V.NASEERA, D/O. P.V.UMMER,MASTIGUDE, PALLIKKARA VILLAGE & P.O HOSDURG TALUK. 2. MANAZIR,AGED 1 YEAR,S/O.NASEERA (MINOR), REP.BY GUARDIAN IST PETITIONER,NASEERA. THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.KRISHNAN,J. ============== R.P.F.C.No. 130 OF 2007 =============== Dated this the 14th day of January 2010. JUDGMENT This revision is preferred against the order of the Family Court, Kasaragod in M.C.No. 15/06. The wife and child moved an application for maintenance and court below denied the maintenance to the wife and awarded Rs.900/- to the child. Dissatisfied with the quantum stating that it is on the higher side the husband has come up in revision. The husband is an auto rickshaw driver by profession. The child is only one year old. Therefore, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner prays for leniency . I feel that since the child is only aged one year, the maintenance amount of Rs.900/- is slightly on the higher side and therefore I fix the maintenance at Rs.750/- leaving open the right of the minor to claim enhanced amount as and when situation arises as contemplated under Section 127 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The mother is permitted to withdraw the amount on behalf of the child. Revision petition is disposed of accordingly. M.N.KRISHNAN,JUDGE. mns