..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3120 OF 2008 Shri Parag Ramkrishna Dharmadhikari ..Applicant. Versus 1. Varsha Narayan Karandikar, & 2. State of Maharashtra. ..Respondents. .... Mr.Vikas B. Tapkir, Advocate for the applicant. Mr.Nitin Deshpande, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mrs.A.A.Mane, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 26th November, 2008. DATED : 26th November, 2008. DATED : 26th November, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the applicant - orig.accused, the learned Advocate for respondent No.1- orig.complainant and the learned APP for the State. The complainant is present. 2. The applicant is seeking quashing of C.R. No.265 of 2000 registered at Sahakari Nagar police station, Pune. The said case is under Sections 143, 147, 149, 452, 323, 506, 427 of Indian Penal Code. 3. The learned Advocate for the complainant has stated that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and the complainant does not wish ..(2).. to pursue her case against the applicant and hence the case against the applicant be quashed. The parties have filed consent terms which are taken on record. In view of the consent terms, C.R.No.265 of 2000 and the proceedings relating thereto are quashed. 4. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)