IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 2212 OF 1992 BALJIT SECURITIES PVT.LTD. (earlier known as BALJIT DEVELOPERS & FISCAL PVT.LTD.) .... PLAINTIFFS VERSUS RANJITMULL GOUTI & Anr. .... DEFENDANTS Mr. Paresh Shah i/b. M/s. Shah & Sanghavi for the Plainiffs. Mr. Hemant Mehta for Defendant No.1. Mrs. Monisha R. Kapadia for Defendant No.2. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. DATE: 1st March, 2005. P.C. 1. The Plaintiffs have filed the draft Amemdment. The learned Counsel for the Defendants have no objection. Amendement is allowed. The amendment shall be carried out in the course of the day today. 2. The parties have filed Consent Terms. The Director of the Plaintiffs is present in person. Defendants Nos. 1 and 2 are represented by their Counsel who states that he has authority to sign the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. 3. The Suit stands disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. No order as to costs. 4. Court fees be refunded as per Rules. 5. Court Receiver to act on a copy of this Order duly authenticated by the Associate of this Court. ---- (S.K.SHAH,J.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 1003 OF 1995 Smt. Snehlata Ranjitmull Gouti & Ors..Plaintiffs Versus Ranjitmull R. Gouti & Anr. ..Defendants Mr. Ahamed i/b. Thakkar & Bali for the Plaintiffs. Mfr. Hemant Mehta for defendant No.1. Mr. Paresh Shah i/b. Shah & Sanghavi for Defendant No.2. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. DATE: 1st March, 2005. P.C. 1. The Plaintiff is present along with the Counsel. The Defendants Nos. 1 and 2 are not present. However, they have signed the Consent Terms as also by their Counsel who claimed to have authority to sign the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are taken on record. 2. The Suit stands disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. No order as to costs. 3. Court fee be refunded as per Rules. --- (S.K.SHAH,J.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 1533 OF 1992 RANJITMULL GOUTI ... PLAINTIFF VERSUS BALJIT DEVELOPE4RS & FISCAL PVT.LTD. ... DEFENDANTS Mr. Hemant Mehta for the Plaintiff. Mr. Paresh Shah i/b. Shah & Sanghavi for Defndants. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. DATE: 1st March,2005. P.C. 1. The learned Counsel for the Plaintiff submits that in view of the Consent Terms filed in Suit No.2212 of 1992, the Plainitff seeks liberty to withdraw the Suit. The suit is allowed to be withdrawn. The suit is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. 2. Court fee be refunded as per Rules. --- (S.K.SHAH,J.)