IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27102 of 2008 SANJAY RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.27108 of 2008 PINTU RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 29.08.2008 A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. Let it be kept on record. Heard learned Advocate of the petitioners as well as learned A.P.P. for the State. Sanjay Rai petitioner of Cr.Misc. No.27102 of 2008 and Pintu Rai, son of Ramdeo Rai, petitioner of Cr. Misc. No.27108 of 2008 are accused in a case instituted under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302 of the Indian penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Earlier the prayer of bail of the petitioners was rejected by this Court on the ground that the petitioners were the assailants. It has been submitted by the learned Advocate of the petitioners that the allegation of firing was against all seven accused persons but as per the post mortem report, only three injuries were found on the person of the deceased. The learned Advocate submitted that under similar circumstance, other co-accused, namely, Ranjeet Rai and Paklu Rai, have already been enlarged on bail by different Benches of this Court. He further submitted that the deceased was a veteran criminal he was accused in as many as four criminal cases and in this regard, a supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of both parties, and considering this fact that under similar circumstance, co-accused, namely, Ranjeet Rai and Paklu Rai have been enlarged on bail by different Benches of this Court, petitioners of both these applications, namely, Sanjay Rai and Pintu Rai son of Ramdeo Rai, are also ordered to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara in connection with Sahar P.S. Case No.50 of 2006. BT (Syed Md. Mahfooz Alam, J)