;^- '^ IN THEHIGHCOURT OFCHHATTISGARH ^ ATBILASPUR 1 C.R.No. 1 /^X OF 2004 REVISIONERS: ^. Jagdish Prasad Singhaniya aged 50 APPLICXNTS: "' years, soa of ShriiRameshwar Lal, •/•~. Pawan Kumar, aged 30years, son of Shri Rameshwar Lal Singhaniya, 3.Rameshwar Lal Singhamya, aged / 65 years, son of late Shri Johari Mal, All residents of Netaji Chowk -""i?3^ Janjgir, tehsil Janjgir, district Janjgir- Janjgir (Chhattisgarh) RESPONDENTS: ^p ^y VERSUS 1. Ram Gopal Tiwari, son of Shri Mohan Lal Tiwari (Amorawale), /^,. Prem Kumari, wife ofDr. Ramesh Y Pandey, Korba (Darri) 3^. Ashok Kumar Sharma, soh of Shri Tiwari, (Amorawale) All residents of Netaji Chowk ~°^[? t~JanJgir, tehsit Janjgir, district Janjgir- Champa (Chhattisgarh) CIVILREVISION UNDERSECTIONT15 OF TfEEGODE OF CIVEL PROGEDURE, 1908. XI-HC-22 *11N<<rn 9b^|ch 3^ r^l^l<rt^, ^Tfi^Ko, Rldiy^< 3(l<3^l45|ch ^:.^'.m./^ 200 W^TcFT f^TW3TT^T $bRT^ t^^Rf^T °/0 ^' 3TI^?T ^cTTW HfN' 1-03-200® Shri Somnath Verma learned This revision petition has mpugned order dated 7.10.2004 Janjgir m CMI Suit No. 41-A/2002 v ;o cross examinethe Commissioner ^ounsel for the applicant. be^n fited by the applicant against the ()assed by Additional District Judge ^hereby the application for permission fias been rejected. However, in view of provisoj procedure and the judgments of th< Pevi Rai Vs. Ram Chander Rai ai ISCC675 as well as in the matter of INagpur Vs. Swaraj Developers aijid 1659. the instant reviston is not maint^iinable <=hi<<T<n41^ iTTOff^1Wi'<f^^i< ^3:rf^R'3TI^T |to section 115ofthe Code of Civil ^ Apex Court in the matter of Surya ^d others reported in (2003) Vol. 6, ^hiv Shakti Coop. Housing Society, others reported in (2003) 6 SCC Accordingly, the revision petit|on is dismissed as not malntainable. Sd/- DHIRENDRA MISHRA Judge (^^fe^)