IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33780 of 2009 DHARMANAND RAM, Son of Vasudeo Ram, Resident of Village-Thengapur, P.S.-Bardaha, Sikty, District-Araria. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 09.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 366A of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that the girl is 17 to 18 years of age as also the fact from the statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. it appears that it was a case of consent and later on the girl back tracked, let the petitioner above named who is in custody since 27.05.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Sikty P.S. Case No. 37 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii)That the affidavit shall - 2 - clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and will not delay the trial and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner then his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)