<s ^' ^ i ^^ ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NOM^^ OF 2011 PETITIONER : / RESPONDENTS: ^> ^' ^ ^'.^...-•^ ^^ y' ^' y' <^/-^ <^-- ^ Martand Deo Upadhyay, S/o H.P. Upadhyay, aged about 48 years, presently posted and working as Constable, Police Station Masturi, District Bilaspur (CG). Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Home, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur 2. Director General of Police, Police Headquarters, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG). 3. Inspector General of Police, Bilaspur Range, Bilaspur ,4. Superintendent of Police, Bilaspur (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner, above named, most humbly and respectfully beg to submits as under: - ^ HIGH.COURT OP CHHATTISOARJH A'r.BILASIWK. 8B ; HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICB PRITINKER DISyAKBR ,v- PBTITIONBR W.PJSI N0. 4824/2011 Martand Deo Upadhyay Ver^usf . , • RBSPONDENTS ' • ;• " StateofC.G..&Others. WRIT PBTITIOII X3WDBR ASTICLB 226/^27 OF T3BE CQKSrirqFTIOaf Qy IIIDIA Aooearance: Shri V.K.Agrawal^ counael fbr fche petitioner. Shri A.V.Shridhar, P.L. forfhe State. •?. ORALOKD3BR (23.08.2011) ..Grieyance of.the petitioner m the preaeat petition is that though he is working as Constable since 25.7.87 but till date he has not been granted the benefit of Kramonnati^ CoiJinsel for the p^titioner submits that purpose of fllmg this petition would be ser^ed if he may be permitted to withdraw this petition aad direction may be issued to resps. 2 & 3 for coneiclering the case of the petitioner and to decide Kis pending representation. State OQunsel haa no objection if the pendmg representationa pf the petitionep are decided bythe competent authority in accordance with law, Accordingjy^ the petitioner is permitted towithdraw this petition with the aforesaid liberty. It is expected from the resps. 2 & 3 to decide the pending representation ofthe petttioner as expeditiously as posmMe, The petitioner ia obliged to submit the copy of this order along with a fresh representation to the resps. 2 & 3. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opimon on the merits of the case and the authority ooncemed wouid be at Uberty to deoide the representation strictly in accordajnce wifh law. Thus,» the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid, Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge