IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 12TH DECEMBER 2011 / 21ST AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 32952 of 2011(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. JIJIN B.S., KUMAR NIVAS, S.L.PURAM P.O., ALAPPUZHA. 2. SANOOP M.N., SARANGA, GRHSS ROAD, KOTTAKKAL P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. IBRAHIM A.NIZAR, NISANI, MELVATHUR P.O., VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 4. VINAYAK P.S., PANDARAPATTATHIL (H), MUHAMMA P.O., ALAPPUZHA, NOW RESIDING AT NEDUMCHIRAYIL HOUSE, PALLIKKUNNU, MUHAMMA P.O., ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.V.MADHUSUDHANAN SRI.T.ISSAC RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT-673636. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT-673636. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.32952/11 APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE IST PETITIONER. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 4TH PETITIONER. EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN DATED 21/11/2011. EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN DATED 21/11/2011. EXT.P7 TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN DATED 21/11/2011. EXT.P8 TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN DATED 21/11/2011. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 32952 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 12th day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the 4th Semester supplementary examination was declared, petitioners applied for revaluation as per Exts.P1 to P4 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the University for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp