IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.568 of 2006 PARMANAND JHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 06/ 22.03.2010 Heard Mr. Gyanand Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Parthasarthi, learned counsel representing the University. Pursuant to the order of this Court dated 22.01.2010, a counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the University setting out the payment of the claims of the petitioner towards post retiral benefits placed at Annexure-B of the counter affidavit relating to pension, gratuity and leave encashment. It is stated that an amount of Rs. 4,35,216/- has been released in favour of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are yet some claims which remain pending relating to arrears of salary and regarding which, no statement has been made by the University. In the situation that the admissible post retiral claims of the petitioner has been paid by the University, no purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and the same is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to raise his grievance before the Registrar of the University and who shall consider and dispose of the same within a period of three months from receipt of such representation and if any 2 claim is found justified the same should be paid to the petitioner within the period stipulated above. The petitioner may also raise his claim with regard to the statutory interest on the belated disbursement of dues and which shall also be considered and disposed of by the Registrar along with his claims. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)