IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30212 of 2010 JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV, SON OF SH. BABU LAL YADAV, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MAWAI KHURD, POST- MUGHALSARAI, P.S.- ALI NAGAR, DISTRICT- CHANDAULI (U.P.) :--- PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH C.B.I. :---OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- 4. 12.10.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the Central Bureau of Investigation (hereinafter referred to as “C.B.I.”). Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offences under Sections 420, 468, 471 and 511 of the Penal Code. He is alleged to have attempted to join Class-IV post in the Railway Establishment at Mughalsarai pursuant to orders issued by the authorities at Hajipur. From the order of the learned Sessions Judge dated 13.07.2010 refusing the prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail in the event of arrest itself it appears that there appears to be a deep routed conspiracy and petitioner is also a party to such conspiracy. From the charge-sheet filed by the C.B.I. which is annexed with the petition it is evident that investigation failed to succeed as to how fake appointment letter was infused into the official channel and at which point i.e. during dispatch or transit or at receiving end and in collusion of which railway official the same was inserted into the official process. It is, thus, evident that only petitioner and - 2 - three others who are said to be the beneficiary of the deep routed conspiracy are sought to be prosecuted. In paragraph-10 of the petition it has been stated that pursuant to the forged letter sent from Hajipur to Mughalsarai petitioner did not work even for a day nor he received or withdrew salary. Such statement has been verified by the counsel for the C.B.I. and he accepts the position that petitioner only attempted to join the post at Mughalsarai but he never succeeded. Be that as it may, until the deep routed conspiracy as found by the Investigating Agency and the learned Sessions Judge is unraveled after reopening of the investigation by the C.B.I. under sub-section (8) of Section 173 of the Cr.P.C. petitioner, named above, be admitted to the privilege of provisional bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judicial Magistrate, C.B.I., Muzaffarpur in connection with C.B.I./A.C.B./PATNA Case No. RC 21 (S) of 2008, provided he surrenders in the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order in the court below. Application stands disposed of. Ibrar/. (V.N.Sinha,J.)