HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBIIASPUR DIVISION BENCH: HON'BLE 8HRI T. P. SHARMA & HON'BLB SHRI R.L. JHAMWAR. JJ. W.IP.tC.l 4116/2007 ^ PBTITIONBRB 1. Anaud Kuuwar about 35 years, Wd/o Puniram aged ^. 2. Ku. Lalita (Minor) D/o Late PuDirain Kanwar aged about 13 years 3. Ku. Garbai (Miuoi) D/o Late F'uniram Kanwar aged about 10 years 4. Diteshwar s/o Late Puniram Kanwar aged about 8 years Note : Petitioners No.2 to 4 are niinors and represented by iiatural guanlian aad inother Anaud Kiuiwar Wd/o Puiuraia, All R/o village Kunlnmi Thana & TahsU Kharsiya, Distaict Ra^arh(C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS 1. Chaiteam Behra s/o Shri Kalachand Bchra R/o . viUage Behramar Tahsil- Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 2. Maaager, United India Insuraace Coinpany Ltd., Branch Office near Gopi TaBdes Raigarh, TahsU and District Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PBTITON UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUIOM OFINDtA Present: Shri Ratan Pusty, counsel for the petitioaers. Shn Amit Sharma, counsel for respondent No. 1. Shri Dashrath Gupta, coiinsel for respondeut No.2. ^ ORDER (Passed on 23rdJune, 2010) Per T. P. Sharma, J. 1. Heard. 2. Order icapugned aad iaterfcm order dated 16.7.2007, passed by this Court, fiaal order of dismissal of award dated 09.04.2007 in claim petition No.32/2007 pemsed. CIaim ffled iu M.A.(C) No. 1439/2009 and M.A.(C) No.1441/2009 also perused, whereby, thc Claims Tribiuaal has dMinissed the petition fiaally. 3. On due consideration, order of impositioa of cost of Rs.3,500/- upon ftie pctitioners and in favour of respoudent No.2 is hereby set aside. 4. -Wifh the above observations, fhe petition is finatty disposed of. 5. No order as to costs. Sd/- T. P. Sharma Judge Sd/- R.L. Jhanwar Judge .yi' ^-