IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34161 of 2009 ROHIT KUMAR @ BIKKU, son of Bahadur Sao, resident of Village Aunta, P.S. Hathidah, District Patna. ----PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 27.11.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Hathidah P.S. Case No.67/08 for the alleged offences registered under sections 366, 366A and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. From the F.I.R. it would appear that the victim girl on her own had gone out of the house in the night in absence of her mother. It is further submitted that the petitioner, who is a student of Intermediate, has been implicated in this case. The petitioner is the neigbour of the informant and on account of village politics, he has been implicated in this false case. After the alleged incident, the daughter of the informant has already married and there is no allegation of misbehavour on the part of the petitioner as stated by the victim girl. Out of the four, two co-accused had been allowed anticipatory bail by the court below itself. It is further submitted the alleged occurrence is of 18th February, 2009 whereas the statement under section 164 Cr.P.C. was taken on 16th March, 2009. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Hathidah P.S.Case No.67/08 within a period of 2 four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)