IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 322 of 2008 Between: Indukuri Gopal Krishnam Raju, S/o Bangaru Raju, ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Chinagadili, Visakhapatnam (Rural) District. 3 Visakhapatnam Urban (Development Authority represented by its Vice-Chairman,Udyog Bhavan, Siripuram Junction, Visakhapatnam. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in interfering and threatening to dispossess the petitioner from the land admeasuring Ac.3.06 cents covered by Sy.No.370/3 of Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam District, without following the due process of law, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess or in any manner interfere with possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in respect of above said lands, and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support there of and the interim order of this Court dated 8.1.2008 and made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Smt. Kavitha Gottipati, Advocate for the petitioner and of G.P.for Revenue for the Respondents 1 & 2 and of Sri M. Ravindranath Reddy, Standing Counsel for VUDA for the Respondent No.2. THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER “The learned Govt., Pleader appearing for respondents 1 and 2 and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.3 submit that the petitioner is not in possession of the land in question and that he has no right and title over the said land. Post for orders on 18.2.2008. It is made clear that the interim order granted by this Court on 8.1.2008 has not been extended. ” ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ..2… To 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Chinagadili, Visakhapatnam (Rural) District. 3 The Vice Chairman, Visakhapatnam Urban (Development Authority represented by its Vice-Chairman,Udyog Bhavan, Siripuram Junction, Visakhapatnam. ( 1 to 3 RPAD) 4. One CC to Smt. Kavitha Gottipati, Advocate (OPUC) 5. Two CCs to the G.P for Revenue, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (OUT) 6. One spare copy. RV HIGH COURT VEJ Dated 11.2.2008 Note: Post for orders on 18.2.2008. ORDER W.P.No. 322 of 2008 Direction HIGH COURT RV Dated 14.2.2008 VEJ Dated 11.2.2008 Note: Post for orders on 18.2.2008. ORDER W.P.No. 322 of 2008 Direction