IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. L.P.A. No.1470 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 4.7.2011 Kurukshetra University. -----Appellant. Vs. Raj Rajeshwari College of Education & others -----Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL Present:- Mr. Nitin Jain, Advocate for the appellant/University. Mr. Madan Pal, Advocate for respondent No.1/College. Mr. Vikas Behl, Advocate for respondent No.4. --- ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, ACJ 1. This appeal has been preferred against order of learned Single Judge wherein while dismissing the writ petitions by the respondent-College, it was observed that the order will not affect admission for the next year. 2. The issue raised in the writ petition related to validity of admissions made for the academic year 2009-10 and validity of denial of examination forms by the University in respect of such admissions. L.P.A. No.1470 of 2010 3. Learned Single Judge upheld the denial of examination forms and rejected the challenge to the view of the University that admissions were valid. 4. In view of the fact that view of the University has been upheld by the learned Single Judge, we do not find any merit in the appeal at the instance of the University. Only point raised is that the observation in the impugned order that the College could participate in the counselling process and admit the students for the next academic session was beyond the prayer. This contention cannot be accepted as the observation only makes it clear that the issue before the Court related to the session 2009- 10 and the rights of the college for the session 2010-11 are not affected by the said decision. 5. Learned counsel for the College states that for admissions for the academic session 2010-11, the University itself had given right to the College to participate in the counselling process and the said year is over. 6. Learned counsel for the University states that the College was permitted to make admissions only on account of observations in the impugned order. 7. Once the admissions had already been allowed to be made, as no stay was granted by this Court, no interference is called for with the said process at this stage. It is, however, made clear that this order will not be treated as an adjudication of any 2 L.P.A. No.1470 of 2010 right of the College to make admissions, which will require adjudication independently whenever necessary. The appeal is disposed of. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE July 04, 2011 ( AJAY KUMAR MITTAL ) ashwani JUDGE 3