IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated : Nainital the April 21st, 2006 Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.272 of 2006 Order on the bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Kamal @ Nitu S/o Kali Ram R/o village Shimli P.S. Laksar District Haridwar …Applicant Versus State of Uttaranchal … Opposite Party Arising out of case crime No.89 of 2005 Under Sections 302, 201 IPC P.S. GRP Haridwar District Haridwar _________________________________________________________ Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Heard Sri Subhash Chandra Tyagi learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. Perused the record. The case rests upon the circumstantial evidence. There is evidence of Sonu Singh before whom the accused Sompal has stated that he alongwith the present applicant committed the offence. There is a last scene evidence of Kanhiya, who has stated that the deceased was lastly seen in the company of Sompal. It was contended that the chain of circumstances in which the incident took place is not complete. Considering the contentions, facts and circumstances of the case, it is a fit case for bail. Let the applicant-accused be released on bail on executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned. Dated 21.04.2006 (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) LSR