IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 20072 of 2006 Between: M/s. Blue Fox Restaurant and Bar. rep by Proprietor S. Venkatesh Reddy S/o Sidda Reddy Ram Nagar GNT Road, Dargamitta, Nellore R/o No.6 RK Towers, Somasekhara Puram Nellore Town and District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Municipal Corporation of Nellore, Nellor eDistrict, rep by Commissioner, 2 The Deputy Executive Engineer and Health Officer(I/C) Municipal Corporation, Nellore, 3 The Commissioner of Prohibition and Executive Andhra Pradesh, Nampally, Hyderabad. 4 The Deputy Commissioner (Prohibition & Excise), Bakthavathsala Nagar, Nellore .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue Writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the in action of the 2nd respondent in considering the petitioner's application dated 30-07-2006 for grant of trade Licence and No. Objection Certiﬁcate' as illegal, arbitrary and high handed, and direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 30-07-2006 and grant trade Licence and No Objection Certiﬁcate to the petitioner for running Blue Fox Restaurant and Bar at D. No. 24/1/1503, Ram Nagar, Dargamitta, Nellore. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.CHAKRAPANI Counsel for the Respondent No.: . The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 20072 OF 2006 ORDER: 1. This writ petition has been ﬁled by Blue Fox Restaurant and Bar rep. by its Proprietor assailing the action of the Deputy Executive Engineer and Health Oﬃcer (I/C), Municipal Corporation, Nellore-2nd respondent in not considering the application dated 30-7-2006 for grant of trade license and ‘No Objection certificate’. 2. Writ petition came to be admitted on 26-9-2006 and an interim order came to be granted. 3. Learned Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise representing 3rd Respondent submits that in pursuance of the interim direction given by this Court the application of the petitioner has been considered and license has been granted and therefore, no cause of action survive in this writ petition. 4. This factual aspect is not disputed by the petitioner. 5. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _____________________________ Justice B.Seshasayana Reddy 27th August, 2008. KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 20072 OF 2006 27th August, 2008.