^sfassisss :::ffl3BS8B "s" PETITIONER HIGHCOURTOFGHHATTISGARH:BILASPUR Writ Petition (O No.4199 of2087 Shiv Narayan Gupta S/o. Shri Vjnclestiwan;§av^^<3upta ^ed about 55 years Occupation— Tea makef^tell^Fy^.^^ll.-Balrsimpur, P.S- Balrampur District Sergiija RESPONDENTS Versus -r>^ :::;::':2)''. 3) ::-^ i 5) State of Chhattisgarh "Fhrough : GoltectoiT, Ambikapur, Dist — Serguja<C.G.5 S.D.M., Ambikapur, Dist - Serguja(C.G.) Project Offlcer, District Urban Development Authority, Ambikapur P.'TandohTahsildar.BalrampB^ Aml?ikapurSeiguja?(Ci.Gj Shyam Rat^^ Jaisvra^ (3.M.O., Nagar I'anchayat, iBaljampur, AmbikapurDist--SeTguja(C.S.) {WritPetition^rKlwArti(;le226crf1^Gonstituti^^^ SB: l-1c»n'b|i^MRi.luttieeSatish K. Agnihotri !^R|sgn|;SgiK^©ipg|j^ndey,cc^ ; "SBnY^l^iASingh^halair,^ -•:..ORDER';:,'ff;'.-:.1 .•-'.:''.^ (Passedo®20th Jyly, 2007} By thjs prtition, ttie petitioner seeks a direction to conduct an enquirYagamst ffieresp6ncle^Mo.1^and4^a^ :him.-:r^''l:'' ,;!' ••:y/'^: •.'•' ^ . 1 ' : .'.'•••'^^i^. :i-'?S /-^s ^i^S^t&]^i tS®£ :^S^^;^s;S^»@^^ ;^-i- 2Y Thefacfe in nut^en.^reBhiat^ejpe^ pieGepfsland besiring^asraiNQ^1<,TO9fl?iadnwasunng^g^ land at BalFampur, ^bikapur, t^^ thereon. The p^ioi^clairas^^b^^e^wn^offhelandon^^^ffi^^^ revenuetecdrdsirrttieyear 199^998; TOe^nstryt^onon^^^^ <^<temQlish^aridafterdefflcdjs^ingffie^(^ filed this petition on thie Igroymd ^^ censttUc^gngTtOyri^cegiw^lllgKfer^^ c6ristTuGfi(^^e|i|Ri^H|orii|j|^|l^gEg|^ ^concerne^ officers.and:compensation^r^i|sS{3ja(;Jj^^^:^%;K^^ ^ l^ ||||i^|igt e||l§ci.in^nlte,^isg^>Unc^ encro8(SfiRign^j^|tji|||>|^|rt^§|i^^;te|<6nSnystep^ encroa<^m®ntfromttie;lana^iri^isRU^^e^R^ioro ofl^.10C^as{ine^rencroachmenf^13^.198&£"niuS,theriatuteof poSsesSionofthepetiticii^r^^iirdjspute^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ 4)^|^ adjudtcate<l|jind|r|ti|'e|@nrtll§oj6gi^^ into' thfrdrtiffmm|tto|JB|I^^Jffltt|3||giare!|8 ^i^;ng1^^ |liie£dispute(^'lany5arKl{|»^tgg|Ui^W^s|ra!MH^Mcttsmati«taj^ glll^l^l^etefrhinafi^^Mgl'iti^hjeg^tiorierohtl^ilisp^^ ^' 5).,'::,WitH?||g||lj|||gt|ie^eniqujiy|againstBg^ ;pre-matui^'ste>ges|||(|li|!^|Si||^|n|l|ftta^^^ncem|ga;liuy^nUes|Ka^ itaken4iil|egal:^aRU^njE^am|il|t|Si|t M|||8^|B|Gannjirtlt»^^ :under^extra^relir)ajyijuj^ii|tiiBi|of||vsliolSBB^'^^i%::: SsdS Ki:^ •-i""<-..:.fc: 6) So faras prayerfor compensation is concerned. thatcan also be Gonsidered only after the nght of^he peUtioner on fhe disputed land has been establjshed. 7) In view 6f the foregoing, there js no merit in the case. The petition deserves to be and is accordjngly dismissed summarily, However, the petitioner is at libertyto move the civil coyrtjurisdictiQnfordetermination of his title/right over the land and cohsicleration tHereof. This order shalt noteomeinv^ofjudicialcletemiinationofthedisputes. ;Sd/-^.y.^, SatishK.Agmlrotri Judge "'c-s:^^ ^