IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21804 of 2010 1. INDRASAN YADAV. 2. Dhanilal Yadav. 3. Mannu Lal Yadav @ Mannu Yadav. 4. Dinesh Yadav. All are sons of Sri Mangal Yadav. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 05.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 365 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that initially a police case was instituted for the same occurrence which ended in a final report and police recommended action under Sections 182 and 211 Cr.P.C. and thereafter cognizance was taken in the matter on the protest treating the same as a complaint, let the petitioners, above named who are in custody since 21.05.2010 be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri P.C. Verma, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bettiah (or his successor) in connection with Tr. No. 2752 of 2010 arising out of Complaint Case No. 2844 of 2007 2 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioners. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)