IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 13TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 22ND BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 28156 of 2010(T) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- VIJAYA V., AGED 47 YEARS, MAHILA PRADHAN KSHETRIYA BACHAT YOJANA AGENT, AGENCY NO.KLR, 2/90, MOHANA VILASOM, KURAVANKUZHY, THATTATHUMALA POST. BY ADVS. SRI.N.M.JAMES, SRI.J.JAYAKUMAR, SRI.S.JIJI. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE DIRECTOR, NATIONAL SAVINGS, NEAR S.M.V.SCHOOL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, KILIMANOOR BLOCK, CHENKIKUNNU, KILIMANOOR POST. R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P. NARAYANAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/09/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 28156 of 2010 T ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 13th day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner was a Mahila Pradhan Agent, who was placed under suspension by Ext.P7 order. Aggrieved by the suspension, she submitted Ext.P8 complaint to the first respondent. Thereafter, pursuant to the directions of this Court contained in Ext.P9 judgment, the first respondent heard the petitioner and passed Ext.P10 order upholding the suspension. It is challenging Ext.P10 order, this writ petition is filed. 2. Irrespective of the correctness or otherwise of the allegations against the petitioner, a reading of Ext.P7 shows that according to the respondents, misconducts have been committed by the petitioner. If that be the situation, the respondents are perfectly within their jurisdiction to place the petitioner under suspension. In that view of the matter, I do not find any good grounds to interfere with Ext.P10 order in a proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution. Be that as it may, the proceedings against the petitioner should be concluded expeditiously so that the uncertainty caused on account of the suspension is given a WPC.28156/10 : 2 : finality. 3. Therefore, I direct the first respondent to complete the proceedings against the petitioner, at any rate, within two months of production of copy of this judgment along with copy of the writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks