IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO.767 OF 2010 (U/s 482 of Cr.P.C.) Sanjay Yadav …………Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand and another …………Respondents Dated: August 12, 2010 HON. DHARAM VEER, J. By means of this petition, moved under Section 482 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short Cr.P.C.), the petitioner/applicant has sought quashing of judgment and order dated 31.7.2010 passed by Judge, Family Court, Haridwar in case no.89 of 2009, Smt. Meera Yadav v. Sanjay Yadav. Heard Mr. Tapan Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Additional Government Advocate for the State. In brief, the facts of the case are that respondent no.2 Smt. Meera Yadav filed an application for interim maintenance before Judge, Family Court, Haridwar against the applicant, on which, the learned Judge, Family Court, Haridwar vide his judgment and order 31.7.2010 directed the revisionist to pay Rs.2,000/- per month as interim maintenance to respondent no.2 during the period of case. The arrears (from the date of application up till the date of order) were also directed to be paid within 30 days. Against the said judgment and order dated 31.7.2010, the applicant has preferred the present application u/s 482 of C.P.C. before this Court. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the court below has awarded the interim maintenance to respondent no.2 without appreciating the evidence on record. I do not find force in the argument put forth by learned counsel for the applicant. From a perusal of the impugned judgment, it reveals that the applicant is running a coaching center. Besides this, he is having agricultural land and has three shops in his house and from all these sources, he is earning Rs.78,000/- per month. Thus, after analyzing the monthly income of the applicant, I am of the view that the court below has rightly awarded Rs.2,000/- per month as interim maintenance to respondent no.2. In view of the aforesaid discussion, I do not find any illegality, impropriety or incorrectness in the impugned judgment and order dated 31.7.2010 passed by Judge, Family Court, Haridwar. The C482 application, being devoid of merit, is dismissed in limine. (Dharam Veer, J.) 12.8.2010 RG