IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42222 of 2009 SHESH NARAYAN SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 4.12.2009 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. The petitioner who faces allegations for committing offence under sections 420 and 468/34 of the I.P.C. as also sections 17(B), 18(a) (1), 18 (c),, 18 (1) (A),28,27(a) and 27(b)(ii) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act seeks his bail only on the ground that he has no connection with the main accused, Vinod Kumar, from whose conscious possession the prohibited drugs are said to have been recovered. In the opinion of this Court, while it is true that the father of the petitioner is said to have been given the house in question on rent to Binod Kumar just a day prior to recovery of huge quantity of medicine as also manufacturing apparatus, that by itself cannot bind the petitioner. Moreover the petitioner also claims that he has no criminal antecedent. Considering all these aspects this Court directs the petitioner, Shesh Narayan Singh, to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M., Patna City, in Agam Kuan P.S. Case No.234/09 one of which must be of his father. It is made clear that the petitioner must remain present in trial court on each and every day of his trial and his absence on two 2 consecutive dates make him liable for cancellation of his bail. Anilkrsinha (Mihir Kumar Jha,, J.)