IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42243 of 2010 SUNIL SINGH SON OF RAM BALAK SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 27.4.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, the State and the informant. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence u/ss.302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 31.3.2010 vide Cr.Misc.No.9592 of 2010 since he had remained absconding for about three years but it was stated therein that it was being rejected for the present. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail since he is in custody since 19.11.2009 and only one witness has been examined uptil-now. This fact is not disputed by the Counsel for the informant. Considering the same as also that the liberty had been granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Shri S.S. Giri, A.D.J., Begusarai in S.T. No.817 of 2010 arising out of Ballia P.S. case No.222 of 2006, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor will - 2 - be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )