,)^) ^rta^ ^l^Stl BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) CONTEMPT CASE (C) N0. 2,6^ / 201 \ APPLICANTSr pnNo...i2^&9r-" p^ssmsd by Shr'^^^l-y— D^^.....-.^,q| ^'^nM^^^%... ^v's31ms/%J\ '^ ^ — ^%^^ '^..^. ^A ^Q.^@^i^l _F-^—-.'• ^w w^'" ^^•^^ RESPONDENTS Kamini Sinha w/o Shri Atma Ram Sinha Aged about 60 years, Titurdih Aaurvedic Hospital Nagar Palika Nigam Durg (C.G.) VERSUS D.D Singh Commissioner Municipal Corporation Durg(C.G) ». ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 24/2/11 PASSED IN W.P. (St. 1056/2011 CONTEMPT CASE UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971. XI-HC—78 3Ti^T^?f^TN- J ^gi -5-=3, ^qTq^T^, '^=rrIT^, T"^!^ ,^^O^o.3&B/( •sr^?^^ (••^i'3^^) SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra iVio m^w^^ '^T^ ^ TfeTA '<f^r^K •^ ^^ ^IT^T 20-10-2011 None for the petitioner eve^ This petition has been fiie<}i order dated 24/02/2011 passed iri In this petition, it has petitioner was disposed of in ternn|i others v. State of Chhattisgsj and Virendra Das Manikpuri others passed in W.P.(S) No.74^ Court, the petitioner has been rei< petitioner from the date of remov^ act of disobedience. The writ petition fiied b^ Dhaniram (Supra) and the action of the Corporation re scrutiny was heid bad and in that case, therewas no specifi< from the date of termination tiil Therefore, in the case of the petit] reinstate the petitioner in ser/icei itself. in the absence of there bei of saiary to the petitioner, it cannol The petition is therefore dismissed in the second round. by the petitioner aiieging willful disobedience of |W.P.(S)No.1056/11. b^en pieaded that the writ petition filed by the rnn|s of orders passed in the case of Dhaniram and isjrh and others, passed in W.P.(S) No.6798/10 others v. The State of Chhattisgarh and >0/10. Though pursuant to orders passed by this istated in service but the arrears of salary to the il i.e. 1/11/2010 have not been paid which js an Virendra Pas quash^d an Shrivastava, J. the petitioner was disposed ofr in terms of (Supra). In the case of Dhaniram (Supra), |moving daiiy wage employees without proper The writ petition was ailowed to that extent. direction by the Court that the arrears of salary fhe date of reinstatement should aiso be paid. ;|oner, all that was required by the respondent to |which has been done as stated in the petition |ng any specific direction for payment of arrears be said that any contempt has been committed. ^ Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge