4n (C.G.) Writ Petition Na. 23iJ—/2003-.v PETITIONER Om Prakash Goyal, aged about E5 years S/o Naubat Ram Goyal, resident of Pendr-a Road, District BilaSpur (G.G.). VErsus RESpoNgpNTS : la Om Prakash Mishra, aged about 51 years S/o Durga Prasad Mishra, Sahayak Matsya Kshetradhikari, Sukama, Distt. Bastar (C.G.). i 2. Jai Prakash Mishra, aged about 48 years S/o Durga Prasad Mishra, Clo—'Operative InSpector, Block Colony, Arang, Disttt Raipur (C.G.)§ 3. Smt. Usha Kiran Pandey, aged 53 years w/o D.P. Pandey, Additional District Magistrate, E.s. Colony, Raipur (C.G.). 4.4 Smt. Aloha Mishra, aged about 44 years S/o Chandra Prakash Mishra, Law Officer, Municipal Corporation BilaSpur ((2.6. ) . 5. Ku. Shubha Mishra, aged about 36 years D/o Durga Prasad Mishra, Block Colony, Arang, Distt.Raipur. e fL\ 6. shriN.L.soni, Advocate, aged so years S/o Parmeskwwr § \\L5on.{ resident of Jarahabhata,BilaSpur (C.G‘.). bani”? R Shri Pardesi aqed abcu't 26 vears sfo Manohar $ur§lav§nsht Occupation' Saréanch; C—Zram Panchayat Chakarbeeia (Bakarbeda) Tahsii Masturi, (Rio. Chakarbeu’a), District Biiaspur (CG). ‘’ versus 1) Om Prakash Mishr aged about 51 years, sic. Durga Ksheiradhikari, Prad Sukama: Mi$h¥a Distt. Sahayak Bastar (6Gl Matsya 2) Jai Prakash Mishra, aged about 48 yeafs, s/o. Durga Pyasad Mishra, Ca-cperative Inspector, Biock Coiony, Arang, Dis‘d. Raipur {CG). 3) Smi. Usha Kiran Pandey, aged 53 years, wlo. DP. Pandey. Addiional District Magistrate, Es. Coion, Raiur CG. 4) Smt. Aisha Mishra, aged abcut 44 years, sic. Chandra Prakash Mishia, Law Officer. Municiai Cororaiion, Biiasur {Cé. 5) Ku. Durga Shubha Prasad iv’iishx' Misra aged Biock abou CeionyfA’i'an‘g, 38 yea s D10 Disft. Raiur. Shri armeshwai' L. Ssni N. Advocate, Soni residéiat aue of 5O Jaiahabizata, ears sic Biiaspur CG. WW: Peiitiori under Articie 225i22? cf the Consiiiution of indie.) 53: Hcn e i‘J‘ir. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. ’ i Preseni: None for the petitiener. Nee im' the respondents. n gRAL GRgER {Passed en' this §m day of February, 2033} The mat-{er is caiied for hearing twice. On boih occasions. none appeai's nor is any iepresentation made on behaii of ihe pe’ziiioner. The pettioner may not be interested in iiie maiiei. 2) in view of ihe above. the writ petition is dismissed ior want of prosecution. 3 Consequentiy, MWPNOS. 2870,2303 and 4311 of 2%4 aiso siand disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri i Judge \L} 3‘ H§GH CGURT OF CHHATTI§GiKRHi EILASFU Writ Petition Ne. 2%11 of 20% Peiiiioner ResaendeMs a. as t y p {} p p p } a h. i n o) P N . . d v () i ‘}