1 cri.appln 2927-2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2927 OF 2010 Chandanmal Jasraj Parmar ...Applicant VS. Sunil D. Satam & Anr. ...Respondents Mr.M.G. Shukla i/b. Mr.Girish Kulkarni for the Applicant. Mr.Ram mani Upadhyay for Respondent No.1. Mr.S.A. Shaikh, APP for the State. CORAM : U.D. SALVI, J. DATED : APRIL 21, 2011 P.C :- 1 Heard. Perused the application and the annexures therewith particularly copies of the notes of evidence and the impugned judgment. 2 The learned trial court entertained the view that there was no legally enforcible debt for which the cheque in question was issued. For coming to this conclusion, the learned trial court relied 2 cri.appln 2927-2010 upon the cross-examination of the complainant and his brother and partner in his business M/s.Jasraj Chamnaji & Co. These aspects have been discussed at para nos.17 and 18 of the impugned judgment. 3 Evidence reveals that the loans were given to several persons and the cases for recovery were lodged against them. The business did not have money lending licence. The learned trial court was, therefore, justified in holding the view that there was no legally enforcible debt. 4 Leave is, therefore, refused. Criminal Application No.2927/2010 stands disposed of, accordingly. (U.D. SALVI, J.)