IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP (T) 7480 of 2008. Decided on: May 26, 2011. Ratni …Appellant Versus State of H.P. & others …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, Advocate. For respondents 1 to 3 Mr. J.S.Guleria, Asstt. A.G. For respondent No. 8 Mr. Dinesh Thakur, Advocate. Surjit Singh, Judge (oral) Heard and gone through the record. 2. Petitioner, who is B.Sc. in Home Science, applied for the post of Home Science Teacher, in response to an advertisement, copy Annexure A-8. As per advertisement, qualification for the post is ‘Matric full subjects with two years Diploma of Training in Home Science from the recognized Institution/University’. Petitioner’s candidature was rejected, on the ground that she did not possess two years Diploma of Training in Home Science. She is aggrieved by this action. Her contention is that her qualification is higher than the qualification, prescribed in advertisement, Annexure A-8, because she holds degree in Whet her report ers of t he l ocal papers may be al l owed t o see t he j udgment ? - 2 - Home Science, while the requirement is of two years Diploma of Training in Home Science. 3. Writ petition is disposed of, with a direction to the respondents, to reconsider the case of the petitioner, in the light of her contention, that in the Degree course of Home Science, training of Home Science is also imparted. A speaking order shall be passed by respondent No. 2, within one month of the receipt of an authenticated copy of this order by him. May 26, 2011(PC) (Surjit Singh ), J.