IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40467 of 2009 1.RAMADHAR SINGH, son of Late Ramdhani Singh 2.SHAMBHU SINGH, son of Ramadhar Singh, Both resident of Village Dubhal, P.S. Magadh Medical College, P.S. Gaya. ---Petitioners Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR. 2. Ganesh Prasad, son of Nanhku Sao, resident of Samir Takia, Durga Asthan, P.S. Civil Lines, District Gaya, presently residing at Anugrah College More, P.S. Chandauti, District Gaya. ---Opp. Parties ----------- 2. 22.12.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The offence alleged against the petitioners, who are apprehending their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.1041 of 2007, is under sections 406, 419, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioners is that the land in question was sold to the complainant in the year 1992 and with respect to the same land, it was sold to one Vijay Sharma. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the area of the land, the present case has been lodged against them. However, petitioner no.2, who is the son of petitioner no.1, had nothing to do as he was allegedly executed the sale deed in question. Learned counsel appearing for the complainant submits that the land which was sold to the complainant was also included in the land which was sold by petitioner no.1 in favour of Vijay Sharma. 2 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the confusion with regard to the area of the land sold to the complainant shall be sorted by the petitioners. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioners no.1 and 2 above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Complaint Case No.1041 of 2007 within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Gaya, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further on the condition that petitioner no.1 shall take all permissible steps to sort out the area of the land sold to the complainant within a period of three months, failing which opposite party-complainant shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail of petitioner no.1. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)