IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38247 of 2008 ZAHANGIR @ MD.JAHANGIR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 17.12.2008 Heard Sri Bimal Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner and Sri D. Mehta, APP for the State. The petitioner is not named in the FIR, but appears properly identified by the witnesses as the person, who had ravished the girl. The medical evidence also supported that. The prayer for bail is on the ground that out of 9 witnesses 5 have been examined and they have not supported the prosecution case. It is contended that the prosecutrix was traceless. This could be very difficult to say that the prosecutrix may not be available to the court merely because some more witnesses are yet to be examined. The trial Judge has mentioned in its rejection order that the trail is being concluded very soon. The petition is dismissed. DKS/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)