IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.2947 of 2011 Decided on: May 6, 2011. Aradhana Thakur …..Petitioner. Vs. State of H.P & others …..Respondents. ____________________________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr.Inder Dutt, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr.Anup Rattan, Central Govt. Counsel, for respondent No.4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Writ petition is filed mainly with the following prayers: “i) That appointment of respondent No.5 as Anganwari Worker may kindly be quashed and set aside as the petitoenr was not allowed to appear in the interview due to illegal acts of respondents No.5 and 6. ii) That respondents No.1 to 3 be directed to conduct fresh interview by affording an opportunity to the petitioner. iii) That respondent No.4 be directed to conduct an inquiry into the acts of respondent No.5 and 6 and to prepare departmental proceedings to initiate action against them.” 2. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, as averred by the petitioner, she is an aggrieved person. So, an appeal is maintainable before the Deputy Commissioner. In the event of the appeal, thus, being filed by the petitioner before the Appellate Authority within one week from today, it shall be treated to be filed in time and thereafter the same shall be considered after affording an opportunity for hearing to the petitioner as also to the other affected parties. 3. With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice May 6, 2011 (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (mlg/tilak) Judge.