1 CAA No.494/10 mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.494 OF 2010 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.177 of 2010 Shri Sunil Kumar Vinodbhai Patel ... Applicant versus Mr.Dnyaneshwar Pandurang Landge & ors. ... Respondents Mrs.A.R.S.Baxi for the applicant Mr.S.V.Sadavarte for respondent no.1. Mr.Vinod Jadhav i/b Vijay Patil for respondent no.2. Mr.V.B. Tapkir for respondent no.3. ... CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 15th December 2010 P.C. 1. In the facts and circumstances of the case, no interim relief can be granted. By prayer clause (a), the applicant has prayed for stay of the suit. In my view, the suit need not be stayed merely because an order of injunction has been granted. Similarly, an order of injunction cannot be stayed because granting of a stay of an order of injunction would amount to permitting the parties to change the nature of the properties during the suit and would defeat the very purpose of injunction. Hence, civil application is rejected. (D.G.KARNIK, J)