THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.3242 of 2010 Dated: 13th April, 2010 Between: Kotte Chennkesavulu. …Petitioner AND State of Andhra Pradesh and two others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.3242 of 2010 ORDER: This petition is filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., for direction to the lower Court to furnish certified copies in Crl.M.P.No.1562 of 2009 in M.C.No.1 of 2006 to the petitioner. The petitioner filed copy application No.2254 in the Court of Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Bapatla in Crl.M.P.No.1562 of 2009 in M.C.No.1 of 2006. Because of confused scribbling of description of documents, in respect of which copies are sought for, office of the lower Court returned the copy application several times. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner approached this court by way of this petition. In the copy application, the petitioner prayed for copies of two items. They are 1) Docket order of Crl.M.P.No.1562 of 2009 in M.C.No.1 of 2006 from filing date till today and 2) Maintenance order passed on 11.09.2009 in Crl.M.P.No.1562 of 2009 in M.C.No.1 of 2006. In so far as description of first document is concerned, there is no confusion. But there is lot of confusion in description of the second document. Admittedly, Crl.M.P.No.1562 of 2009 is one filed for execution of the maintenance order and no maintenance order was passed in Crl.M.P.No.1562 of 2009. That is the reason why the office of the lower Court rightly returned the copy application saying that the number is not tallying. Now, the petitioner can have the first document, whose description is proper and correct. Since there is no maintenance order passed on 11.09.2009 in Crl.M.P.No.1562 of 2009, the petitioner cannot have any copy thereof. In the result, the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Bapatla is directed to give certified copy of docket orders in Crl.M.P.No.1562 of 2009 in M.C.No.1 of 2006 from filing date till the date of copy application, on the petitioner resubmitting the said copy application in the lower Court. With the said directions, the criminal petition is disposed of. Registry will return the original Copy Application to the petitioner’s counsel. __________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J April 13, 2010 lmv