IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL, TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 24480 of 2002 Between: P. Sangram, S/o. Hanumanth Rao, R/o. Siddapur (K) village, Bodhan Mandal, Nizamabad Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Nizamabad. 2 C.I. of Police, P.S. Rural Bodhan, Nizamabad District. 3 Asst.Sub-Inspector of Police., P.S.Rural Bodhan., Nizamabad. 4 P.Kalavathi w/o Hanumanth Rao, Bodhan Mandal Nizamabad District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue writ, order or direction more particularly the respondents 2 & 3 herein not to interfere and not to compell the petitioner to compromise with the 4th respondent with regard to the property i.e.land in Sy.No.128/AA admeasuring Ac.4.31 Gts.Situated at Siddapur Village., Bodhan Mandal, Nizamabad District and also not to detain the petitioner or his family members in the P.S. without following any procedure under law by duly declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering and compelling the petitioner to compromise the civil dispute with the 4th respondent with regard to the above said property as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner :MR.V.RAVI KIRAN RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: The petitioner seeks to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents more particularly the respondents 2 and 3 not to interfere and not to compel the petitioner to compromise with the 4th respondent with regard to the property i.e land in Sy.No.128/AA admeasuring Ac.4.31 guntas situated at Siddapur village, Bodhan mandal, Nizamabad District and also not to detain the petitioner or his family members in the police station without following due procedure under law by duly declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering and compelling the petitioner to compromise the civil dispute with the 4th respondent with regard to the said property, as illegal and arbitrary. A counter has been filed on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3 denying all the allegations and stated that the petitioner was never called to the police station nor he was compelled or threatened to compromise the alleged matter with the 4th respondent at any point of time either by the 3rd respondent or by any police personnel. In view of the categorical denial of all the allegations by the respondents, no further orders are required to be passed in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. Date:02.04.2008 Ccm To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{BDLNM}