-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.875 of 2008 1. Deoraj Kandiba Jadhav and others ..Petitioners vs. Dashrath Lalasaheb Dongare ..Respondent Shri V.B.Rajure for petitioners. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. 8th February, 2008 8th February, 2008 8th February, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. In all fairness Shri Rajure submits that after dismissal of the Appeal on 4th December, 2007, the respondent has completed the construction over the disputed portion. However, he has invited my attention to para 9 of the impugned order and has further contended that the controversy is with regard to the portion being public road or not. Hence, it is in public interest that the Trial Court should decide the suit as expeditiously as possible. 2. I see no reason to reject the later request of Shri Rajure. Injunction application was rejected by the Trial Court and that order is confirmed by the Appellate Court. The order is based upon the material produced at the prima -2- facie stage. All observations are, therefore, tentative and prima facie. Considering the nature of the controversy, the hearing of Reg.Civil Suit No.176 of 2007 is expedited and the Trial Court is directed to endeavour and dispose of the RCS suit on or before 31st December, 2008. Petition is disposed of. No costs. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.)