/ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEVV DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3145/2011 ANAND PRAKASH SHARMA Through versus STATE THROUGH CBI Through CORAM: ..... Petitioner Mr. Yudhishtar kahol and Mr. Manjeet Godara, Advocate ..... Respondent Mr. Sonia Mathur, Advocate HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALl 0/o ORDER 20.09.2011 Cri.M.A.No. 11166/2011 1. This is an application seeking exemption from filing the certified copies of annexures. 2. Subject to the deficiency being rectified within four weeks, the application is allowed. 3. The application stands disposed of. Crl. M.C. No.3145/2011 4. This is a petition filed by the petitioner for quashing of FIR R.C. NO.S(E)/2006/E.O.U VII under Section 120-B & 193 IPC and Section 13 (2) read with 13 (1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act registered by CBI, New Delhi. \ --- I ' ,. '' !'I -' Signing Date:27.08.2024 16:57:17 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified I 5. After brief submissions, the learned counsel for the petitioner has very fairly conceded that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to take appropriate steps after the trial court's decision on the question of framing of charge. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further prayed since the matter is pending before the trial court some direction be given to hear the matter expeditiously. Learned counsel for the respondent does not have any objection to the directions having been given to the trial court. 7. In view of the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, however, learned trial court is requested to hear the arguments and decide the question of charge as expeditiously as possible. SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 b V.K. SHALI,J ' ·, I :- I co