1 mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.4627 of 2010 M/s.Savannah Hospitality Pvt.Ltd.& Anr ... Petitioners versus Shri Narayan Lachhmandas Mathreja ... Respondent ... Mr. P.K.Dhakephalkar, Sr.Counsel i/b Mr.Amol P. Mhatre for the petitioner. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATED : 17h June 2010 P.C. 1. Heard Mr.Dhakephalkar, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner is a licensee. The trial Court has directed the petitioner to deposit arrears of license fee at the rate of Rs.80,000/- per month which is the agreed rate of license fee. The petitioner licensee filed a revision in the District Court in which District Court directed the petitioner to pay 50% of that amount. I see no reason to interfere in the said order at the instance of the licensee. 3. As the petitioner is in possession of the property as a license and wants to retain possession, he must pay the license fee. In my view, the 2 District Court has shown leniency by directing him to pay only 50% of the amount. However, since the order of reducing the amount has so far not been challenged before me by the respondent licensor till this date, I cannot interfere with the order of the District Court directing payment at the agreed rate. In any event, the licensee is not entitled to any relief. Writ Petition is accordingly rejected summarily. (D.G. KARNIK,J.)