IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 7268 of 2009 Date of Decision: October 28, 2010 Brahm Dutt Sharma. …Petitioner Versus Murti Devi and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajinder Goyal, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 to 5. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner shall file certified copies of the revenue record with the permission of the learned Trial Court under Order 7 Rule 14(3) C.P.C. and certified copies of the public document (revenue record) need no formal proof. Learned counsel for the C.R. No. 7268 of 2009 respondents states that it is true that certified copies of the revenue record need no formal proof and plaintiff can move an appropriate application before the learned Trial Court under Order 7 Rule 14(3) C.P.C. seeking leave of the Court to place on record certified copies as additional evidence. In view of this, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with the aforesaid liberty. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. October 28, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2