IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7118 of 2009 ARUN KUMAR CHOUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR THRU. CBI. ----------- 2. 18.03.2009 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the CBI. Renewing the prayer for anticipatory bail the ground urged is that prior to rejection of the earlier prayer for anticipatory bail co-accused had been granted anticipatory bail in Cr. Misc. No. 36830 of 2006 and 22985 of 2008. From the computerized chart prepared by the Registry of the bail applications arising from the present FIR it appears that apart from the present petitioner the prayer for anticipatory bail of other co-accused has been rejected in Cr. Misc. Nos. 31192/2008, 23104/2008, 57239/2007 and 44014/2007. This Court is unable to persuade itself to reconsider the prayer for anticipatory bail simpliciter on the ground urged. This application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner shall be considered by the court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)