IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12259 of 2010 BALRAM PODDAR, son of Late Karu Poddar, resident of village- Akbar Nagar, PS- Akbar Nagar, District- Bhagalpur….. Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 05.08.2010 Having heard counsel for the petitioner as also State and perusing the earlier order of this Court, this Court would find that the prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected on merits holding him to be the main assailant. That being so, when there is no fresh material for reconsideration of the prayer for bail of the petitioner, this Court would find no ground to take a different view and accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is again rejected. At this stage, counsel for the petitioner would submit that four witnesses have already been examined in course of trial and therefore the trial court may be directed to dispose of the trial expeditiously. In view of the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 2.12.2008 and there are in all 18 charge- sheeted witnesses, this Court would direct the trial Court to ensure that the trial of the petitioner is concluded as 2 early as possible. With the aforementioned observation and direction, this application is rejected. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)