XI-HC—78 sn^i w (^iiti WT 3?n^TsbM <w. +, ^WW th*11«l» ^ss[ "4|A|icf<i, ®-al<-nc,fq<ni'yy,< ^.(^...^ass sn^i'qgq? (4.'iild<i<ti) •TOiiWHfean^i PETiT!QNER: Ramla! IMartand, S/o Late Shri Banwaii Martand, Aged ai(ouf 43 years, Occupation AssisSant Viiiage Pancha^at Officer. Village Panchayat, Godhi, Janpad panchayat, Korba, Disfrict Korba (CG) Versus RESPONDENTS: 1. State Departrf IVlantral^ (C.G.5 2. The Cojrsmissioner Panchayat and Socia! Weifare Departrr|ent, Mantralaya, Dau Kaiyan Singh Raipur (CG) Bhawanl 3. The Chi| District S 5. The,,.Ch Korba, C (Writ Petition under Artici Shri Ratnesh Kumar Agrawal Shri Yashwant Singh ThakU Heard. The grievance of the petitii sus.oension vide order of Annexure- and the Chief Executive Officer departmental ena.uirv and submitte! ifiwfei^h lfl^?ff ^f T«1^)<^'(<$i< ^afflptsii^t of Chhattisgar'n, through Secretary, ent of Panchayat & Rurai Department, iya, Dau Kaiyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur ^fExecutive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Korba ];orba (C.G.) 4. The Der|ufr/ Director Panchayatand Social Welfare, Korisa, [^istrict Korba (CG) . ef Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, ilstrictKorba(C.G.5 226 of the Constitution of India) MISHRA, J. , counsel for the pstitioner. r, Deputy Advocate General for the State/ |>ner is that the petitioner was put under )P/1 and departmenta! enquiry was ordsred Janpa.d Panchayat, Kor'oa, conducted his enquirv report of Annexure-P/2 on 28- N ;.: ^ ;»s •essmsmtSSSIWS. ^s XI-HC—78 3II^?T W K-ii'h 'nqi sn^i *t)i* Bap/e •^. 'S^! •*iww'li, ynly'ico, fsK'11'My HIHMI »*ll<t>" """"""""""""" "W^ 200 sn^f 'tr??i' (^f^p) ^WIW fl^ ^l^fl ^- 4-2008 arid exonerated the authority was not satisfied with th enquiry and appointed SDO (Rev« (Rev^nue) encuin/ petitioner. Second enquiry was a|i dated 28-8-2008 again exonerated| suspension.gfithe petitioner has n^t ^sufsEaSsed representation suspension order in view of the ,)30t be^a G'6nsidered and decided ti| Learned counse! for the petit competent authority be directed to iji' specified period. Learned counse! for representation of Annexure-P/5 period of2 wseks from the date in view ofthe submissions instant petition is disposed of wW consider representation oTAnnexur^ expeditiously preferabiy witbin a pe( copy of this order. ^iRrF^rt^ iTFT^ff if 'fe^ <Fan^i< ^TSfflPTSn^I from the charges. However, disciplinary enquiry report and further directed fresh Korba to conduct enquiry against the so conducted by SDO, who by his report the petitioner from aii charges. However, been revoked ti!i date. The Detitioner has of Annexure-P/5 against continuance of juiry reports. However, representation has loner submitted that in these cireumstances itiecide representation (Annexure-P/5) wjthin fie State/respondents submitted thal shai! be considered and decided within a ofi|eceipt of a copy of this order. rjiade by learned counse! for the partses, the a direction to the competent authority to s-P/5 ofthe pet'tioner and dedde fhe same •1'iod of 2 weeks from ths date of receipt of a .Sd/-, .' IrturendraMishra Judge