IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1269 of 2008 RENU VERMA & ORS Versus PRABHAT CHANDRA SINHA & ORS ----------- 7. 19.1.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the opposite party no.1. No one appears for the opposite party no.6 although she has entered appearance by filing two Vakalatnamas; the second being without any No Objection. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, the delay in filing the restoration application is condoned. I.A.No.5092 of 2008 is, accordingly, disposed of. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the peremptory order which was required to be complied with by 22.7.2004, on account of miscalculation was fully complied with on 23.7.2004 through part compliance was made well within time. In the above circumstances, F.A.No.294/96 is directed to be restored to its original file. The restoration application is, accordingly, allowed. (Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.) spal/