IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2480 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 2480 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 2480 OF 2006 Sou. Shalini Prabhakar Atyale ... Petitioners and ors. V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Suresh N. Bhosale for the petitioners. Mr. P.H. Kuntharia, APP for respondent No. 1. CORAM CORAM CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 10th January, 2007 : 10th January, 2007 : 10th January, 2007 P.C. . We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. We have perused FIR which is sought to be quashed. In our opinion FIR prima facie discloses offence against the petitioners. This is not a case in which it can be said that even if the allegations made in the FIR are taken at the face value they do not prima facie make out any case against the accused. Such a complaint cannot be quashed. The petition is therefore dismissed. However, if any other remedy is available to the petitioners, they may adopt it and the Court dealing with any proceeding filed by the petitioners shall deal with it independently and uninfluenced by our observation. The petition is dismissed. [SMT.RANJANA [SMT.RANJANA [SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.] DESAI, J.] DESAI, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]