IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17409 of 2008 SADANAND RAWAT …Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Md. Sirajuddin 3. Yogendra Rai …Opposite parties ----------- 3. 23.12.2008. This application is for cancellation of bail so granted to opposite parties vide order dated 26.3.2008. Heard learned counsel for both the parties and also perused the counter and supplementary affidavit filed by the petitioner. It appears that the case is based on complaint petition. The case is of bouncing of cheque which is bailable in nature. It further appears that the petitioner moved before Sessions Court as well as this Court and in view of certain observations made by the Superior Court learned magistrate vide order dated 26.3.2008 granted bail to the opposite parties. Keeping in view the accusation as well as the directions of Superior Court passed in anticipatory bail application; I am also of the view that the court below has rightly granted bail. I do not find any material to interfere in the impugned order. Accordingly, this application for cancellation of bail is rejected. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)