IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4264 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2541 OF 2006 The CIT, Bombay )..Appellant Versus M/s.Gitanjali Exports Corpn., )..Respondents ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.S.J.Mehta i/by M/s.S.P.Mehta for respondents. ---- Coram : F.I.REBELLO & Coram : F.I.REBELLO & Coram : F.I.REBELLO & R.S.MOHITE,JJ R.S.MOHITE,JJ R.S.MOHITE,JJ Date : 15.01.2008 PC 1. This is a Notice of Motion for condoning 784 days delay in filing of the main appeal. On perusal of the affidavit in support, we find that the CCIT-VI approved the filing of the appeal on 04.10.2004 and the appeal was filed on 30.11.2006. The events which occurs between 04.10.2004 and 30.11.2006 are not listed and therefore, the delay between the period 4.10.2004 and 30.11.2006 is not properly explained. Hence, the cause shown is therefore, not sufficient cause. Hence, Notice of Motion dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE,J) (F.I.REBELLO,J) (R.S.MOHITE,J) (F.I.REBELLO,J) (R.S.MOHITE,J) (F.I.REBELLO,J) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2541 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2541 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2541 OF 2006 The CIT Bombay )..Appellant Versus M/s.gitanjali Exports Corp., )..Respondents ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.S.J.Mehta i/by M/s.S.P.Mehta for respondents. ---- Coram : F.I.REBELLO & Coram : F.I.REBELLO & Coram : F.I.REBELLO & R.S.MOHITE,JJ R.S.MOHITE,JJ R.S.MOHITE,JJ Date : 15.01.2008 PC 1. As the Notice of Motion dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed. Refund of court fees as per rules. Certified copy expedited. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)