IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 1ST JANUARY 2008 / 11TH POUSHA 1929 WA.No. 3026 of 2007 --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN WPC.36489/2007 Dated 19/12/2007 .................... APPELLANT/PETITIONER: ------------------------------------- SUDHIKUMAR .C.S., AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.C.N.SUDHAN, C/O.MS BEENA, B-27, AMRITHA NAGAR COLONY, AMBALAMEDU P.O., PUTHENCRUZ (VIA), TRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.S.SUDHIRKUMAR(PARTY IN PERSON) RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ---------------------------------------------- 1. THE BAR COUNCIL OF KERALA, BAR COUNCIL BHAVAN, HIGH COURT CAMPUS, COCHIN 682 031, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA, 21, ROUSE AVENUE, INSTITUTIONAL AREA, NEW DELHI -2, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L. DATTU, CJ. & K.M. JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WRIT APPEAL No.3026 of 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 1st day of January, 2008. JUDGMENT H.L.DATTU, CJ, This appeal arises out of an order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) 36489 of 2007 dated 19th December, 2007. By the impugned order, the learned Single Judge has refused to grant the interim relief sought for in the writ petition. 2. In the writ petition, the petitioner had sought for an interim direction. The interim direction and the main relief are one and the same. The learned Single Judge, after hearing the parties to the lis, has come to the conclusion that the interim relief sought for by the petitioner need not be granted. Accordingly, the learned Single Judge has refused to grant the interim prayer. 3. Since the Writ Appeal arises out of rejection of an interim prayer, and since the order so passed by no stretch of imagination could be construed as a perverse order, we do not intend to interfere with the said interim order. Therefore, the writ petition requires to be rejected and it is rejected. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to make an appropriate application before the learned Single Judge for out of turn hearing. Ordered accordingly. H.L. DATTU, CHIEF JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE sb.