In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 3176 of 2009 Date of decision: May 28, 2009 Vijay Kumar and others .. Petitioners Vs. Manohar Lal and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Sandeep Khunger, Advocate for the petitioners. A.N. Jindal, J The suit was filed by the decree holder against the defendant- judgment debtor (herein referred as 'the judgment debtor') on 15.7.2003 qua 11 kanals 9 marlas of land being 1/7th share in 80 kanals 5 marlas. His suit was decreed against Manohar Lal judgment debtor. However, during the pendency of the suit, defendant judgment debtors had sold 70 kanals 10 marlas of land vide two sale deeds i.e. 4.8.2003 and 27.10.2003. These sale deeds certainly having been executed by the defendant-judgment debtor in favour of the objector-petitioner (herein referred as 'the petitioner') suffers from the principles of lis-pendise. Anyway, the decree is now only qua less than 1/7th share of the judgment debtor in the suit land. Initially the judgment debtor had agreed to sell 11 kanals 9 marlas of land, however, during the pendency of the suit the decree holder (now respondent) had relinquished 1 kanal 3 marlas and kept his relief confined to 10 kanals 6 marlas which is 1/7th share of the land measuring 72 kanals 5 marlas. As such, the sale of the property during the pendency of the suit would not stand in the way of execution of the decree. The objections being superfluous have been rightly declined by the executing court. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. May 28, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge