IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.525 of 2010. 1. SUDAMA PRASAD GUPTA S/O LATE AYODHYA PRASAD GUPTA R/O MOH.- TAKIA BAZAR, SASARAM, P.S.- SASARAM ( T ), DISTT.- ROHTAS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. ----------- 02. 12.08.2010 The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 17.12.2007 by which Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram has taken cognizance in Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No. 330 of 2007 under Sections 18, 18(A), 18(B) and 22 (3) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. The submission of the counsel for the petitioner is that subsequent to the filing of the charge-sheet a report has been received stating therein that the articles which has been seized from the possession of the petitioner was sub-standard and therefore no offence is made out against the petitioners In my view, all these documents can be considered at the stage of trial and the impugned order calls for no interference into the matter. In view of such, this application is dismissed. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)