IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.310 of 2011 Ganesh Singh, Son of Lae Dwarika Singh, R/o village Rampur, P.S. Makhdumpur, District Jehanabad. …….. Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Divisional Commissioner, Magadh Range, Gaya 3. The Collector, Jehanabad 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Jehanabad 5. The Block Development Officer, Makhdumpur, District Jehanabad 6. The Block Education Extension Officer, Makhdumpur, District – Jehanabad 7. The Headmaster, Middle School Rampur, Block Makhdumpur, District Jehanabad 8. The Secretary, Vidyalaya Education, Committee Middle School Rampur, P.S. Makhdumpur, District Jehanabad 9. Assistant Engineer, Bihar Shiksha Pariyojna, Jehanabad 10. Junior Engineer, Bihar Shiksha Pariyojna, Makhdumpur, Jehanabad …… Respondents ----------- 2 06.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Large number of writ petitions claiming to be in public interest are being preferred in this Court seeking various kind of inquiries and investigations. We have considered the matter in C.W.J.C. No. 16549 of 2010 (Devanand Ray Versus The State of Bihar & ors.) disposed of on 3.1.2011 and it has been held that in ordinary cases required action should be taken by the 2 District Magistrate or other officer concerned who are in a better position to decide what matters need to be inquired into on account of seriousness and magnitude. Only in rare cases where the extent of embezzlement is large and the allegations are specifically against higher officials then this Court may interfere in public interest. Following the aforesaid view this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner that he may approach the District Magistrate or other concerned officers who will act in the matter as per their own wisdom. Spd/- (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)