IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 21ST AUGUST 2007 / 30TH SRAVANA 1929 WP(C).No. 25507 of 2007(J) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- 1. K.K. KAMALAKSHI PUTHNPURAYIL HOUSE, KUMARAKOM, KOTTAYAM. 2. THOMAS JOSEPH S/O. M.T. JOSEPH NIDHEERICKAL HOUSE, KUMMANAM P.O., KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.A.K.ABDUL AZEEZ RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. SECRETARY RTA, KOTTAYAM. 2. SINDHU K. SABU, KOORAMATTATHIL, VELOOR PO., KOTTAYAM. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21 /08/2007 , THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 25507 of 2007 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 21st AUGUST, 2007. J U D G M E N T The petitioners challenge Ext.P3 order by which a temporary permit has been issued to the 2nd respondent to the extent of the timings of the service mentioned therein. The contention of the petitioners is that since the temporary permit is only for a period of twenty days by the time they file a revision and get an order, that period would be over and that is why they have filed this writ petition. Even if the contention of the petitioners is accepted the position would not be different in this writ petition also because without issuing notice to the 2nd respondent I cannot consider the matter for orders. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the petitioners objections also while considering reissue of the temporary permits granted by Ext.P3 if the 2nd respondent again applies for the same. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE. Acd/