/ ./o^ IN THE mGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.PCS^No.^^6 /2006 PETITIONER A^-^ ^sssf-^ ^'^y Wi' -'•"-•• Manohaer lal Bharti S/o Shri Bise lal Bharti aged about 55 Year Revenue Inspectorposted At Revenue circle Nayapara, Tahsil Abhanpur Distt. Raipur (C.G.) ^^. ^" VERSUS RESPONDENTS .«^~ ^.^ •^^ ^ ^> ^ o <&'^ / $•• •^^^t^W^- ^«fi^'S'yZ^ t.^ ^ 'R^yr€^^:::' p ^(^fftft^^ " ''k'-y.N... .y.'s ^ ' "Bic^»vy "•^^t?^:*y-^' State ofChhattisgarhthrough The ' secretary Revenue department D.K.S. Bhavan Raipur(C.G.) Collector land record Branch Raipur, Tahsil and Distt Raipur (C.G.) Sub divisional officer Raipur Tahsil and Distt Raipur (C.G.) Write Petition under Article 226 of Constitution oflndia for issueine the anproDriate writ in the nature of mandamus and certiorari. ,* 1. PARTICULARS OF PETITIONER : As stated above is the cause Title ofthe petition. XI-HC-78 an^r^rf^irai cwr sfl^r stiui* *11Wcn SfrHT^l 7sf -^ww^, ^-^[w\s, hvtwy. rna- . •K3 p.y/.?.6/°.<°. ^[ 200 3TT^?T iiach ('i,c<(^ciyT) B^IRK flfscf an^T anU 11.8.2008 Mr. Manoj Kumar Dubey, Ad\ Mr.Satish Gupta, Dy. Govt. Heard. By this petition, the petitiorl 18.7.2006 whereby he has been inti] Kanker and therefore, he is relieved The main grievance of the Inspector in the District Raipur therefore, he cannot be transferred the transfer order till date. In the ciroumstance, learnef petitioner may be allowed to make arid in turn, he be directed to decid learned oounsel for the State has nd Having heard learned couns^ and cireumstances of the case, case, ttie petitioner is allowed to grievances to respondent No.1 wittli petition & annexures and in turn, re| the petitioner within a period of 30 in aocordance with law after consid^i In the meantime, tiil the 4 operation of impugned order date<|l remained stayed. It is made clear tf|i presoribed period, then this stay ord[ With the direction aforesaid, Consequentiy, M.(W.)P No.; ^. for the petitioner. A|Jvooate for the State on advanoe copy. •jer has challenged his relieving order dated intilnated that he has been transferred to Distriot 1:0 join at the new place of posting. Ipetitioner is that he is working as Revenue as his services are district level services, ^ut of district. Moreover, he has not received -of.. Certified copy as per rutes. cfi<<t<'i<n-f *<ihCTTfftei^<Ri+Ai< ^iSrf^lTSD^T WitllOUt counset for the .petitioner submits that the |a detailed representation to respondent No.1 the same in accordance with lavv, to which 1 objectipn. for the parties and having regard to the facts expressing any opinion on the merit of the r|nake a detaited representation raising all his in 10 days from today along with copy of this 'tpondent No.1 to decicte the representation of ^ays from the date of receipt of representation ring all the points raised bythe petitioner. icision 'of the representation the effect and 18.7.2006 in respect of the petitioner shal] if the representation is not made within the pr shall automatioally stands vacated. |he petition stands. disposed of. ^240/06 & I.A. N0.7697^)6 a!so stand disposed tfkat Sd/- LJ </*- ,/^ ^ <'" Judge