1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2385 OF 2008 ( Shyamrao Damodhar Kullarkar vs. New Adiwasi Bahu Uddeshiya Vikas Sanstha Ltd. ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DECEMBER 16, 2008. Heard Ms. Bhambhwani, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Parate, learned counsel for the respondent. No detailed orders are necessary in the matter because after time was given to Shri Parate, learned counsel, who on earlier occasion was in rather disturbed mood because of some domestic problems, today after verification has fairly stated that two documents in relation to which permission was not given were also exhibited inadvertently before the trial Court. He, therefore, has no objection if those documents are de-exhibited. He, however, states that the respondent should be given liberty to move appropriate application for proving those documents also before the trial Court. The request is being strongly opposed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. The issue is not before this Court because 2 the petitioner has pointed out that the plaintiff was permitted to be recalled only in relation to documents filed with list 31. In the circumstances, the evidence of plaintiff recorded after recall in relation to documents not included in list 31 cannot be kept or cannot be read as part of the record. The same is accordingly removed. Writ Petition is accordingly allowed only to that extent. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.