IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 18TH AUGUST 2009 / 27TH SRAVANA 1931 RP.No. 345 of 2009(Y) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.3141/2009 Dated 30/01/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): 1ST RESPONDENT IN WPC ------------------------------------------- THE TEEKOY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., TEEKOY P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY IN CHARGE, TEEKOY P.O. BY ADV. SRI.SHAJI THOMAS PORKKATTIL SRI.BINU PAUL SRI.T.V.VINU RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 2 TO 5 ---------------------------------------------- 1. JOSE SEBASTIAN, VALIYAVEETTIL HOUSE, TEEKOY P.O., KOTTAYAM DIST. 2. THE DISPUTE REDRESSAL OFFICER, THE KOTTAYAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., KOTTAYAM. 3. ASST. REGISTRAR (GENERAL), MEENACHIL, PALA. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI. R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.N.SASIDHARAN R2 BY ADV.T.A.SHAJI R3, R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.V.MANU R5 BY ASST. SOLICITOR GENERAL THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- R.P.No.345 OF 2009 IN W.P(C).No.3141 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of August, 2009 O R D E R Having regard to the materials on record, I do not find any ground to vacate the directions in the judgment sought to be reviewed on its merits, as of now. I say this only to exclude any submission later on, that the said judgment does not survive the order that is now being minuted. Taking into consideration the limited plea that the review petitioner, first respondent, is desirous of an opportunity of being heard to place better particulars in opposition to the writ petition, the judgment sought to be reviewed is recalled since it was one issued without hearing the review petitioner. Hence, the review petition is allowed and the writ petition will be listed for further consideration. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge kkb.29/8.