Crl. Misc. No.M-3167 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-3167 of 2011 Date of Decision: 25.03.2011 Hardial Singh Dhillon ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Ravmeet Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Vaneet Soni, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G., Punjab for the respondent-State. Mr. R.K. Singla, Advocate for respondent No.5. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to stop further enquiry on the false and frivolous application of respondent No.5 as the similar enquiry was held by respondent No.4, who reported that no cognizable offence was made out against the petitioner. Reply on been filed by respondent No.5 in the Court today. The same is taken on record. Reply has also been filed by respondents No.1, 2 and 6, as well as separate reply has been filed by respondent No.4. The same are Crl. Misc. No.M-3167 of 2011 2 taken on record. Copies, thereof, have been supplied to learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. As per the reply filed by respondents No.1, 2 and 6, as well as, reply filed by respondent No.4, the respondent No.5, who is the sister of the petitioner, had moved an application dated 20.12.2010 with the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana levelling allegations that the petitioner has got transferred one plot of respondent No.5 in his favour by forging the signatures of respondent No.5. The enquiry of the said application was marked to the S.H.O., Police Station NRI Cell, Ludhiana which was further marked to Head Constable Gurdip Singh, respondent No.4, NRI Police Station, Ludhiana. The petitioner was accordingly summoned by the police of Police Station NRI, Ludhiana and the statement of the petitioner was also recorded by Head Constable Gurdip Singh. However, the allegations levelled against the petitioner were not proved, accordingly, the said complaint/application was filed. Learned counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions from Sub Inspector Gopal Krishan, further states that there is no other application or complaint filed by respondent No.5, pending before the concerned authorities as on date. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 25.03.2011 JUDGE gurpreet