PETITIONER on instruction, seeks permission 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner? of this Court to withdraw‘this petition on the ground that this petition has become infructuous. No objection from other side. It is ordered. 2. The petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.‘ 3. Consequently, M(W)P No. 3348/03, application for grant of ad-interim relief, stands disposed of. HiGl-i COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition Nu 371 1 of 2002 Smt. Itwari Bai, W/o Sundar Lal Kewat, aged about 45 years. R/o village Gullidand, Tab. Gourella, I’endra Road, Distt. Bilaspur (CG). VERSUS . State ofChhattisgarh through Collector, Distt. Bilaspur (CG). Sub Divisionai Otiicer/Prescribed Aum%é%% Sub Division Gourella, Distt. Bilaspur (CG). Tahsildaf, Tahsil Gourella, Pendra Road, Distt. Bilaspur (CG). Sakul, S/o Bandhu Rao, aged about 48 yeaJS? R/o Gullidand, Tah. Gourella, Pendfa Road, Distt. Bilgspur. (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) SB: Hon'ble Mr. SatiSh K. A Present : Shri Ravish Velma Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed onW 30 day of January, 2&9) 3‘ Sd/u . i l Satish K.Agnihotri % Judge '