WP(C) 6478/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA Heard Mr. G.N. Sahewalla, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner. A lso heard Mr. B.J. Ghosh, learned Govt. Advocate. The grievance of the petitioner as enunciated in the writ petition is that thoug h under the Assam Forest Regulation,1891, stone is not a forest produce, the res pondent authorities are insisting upon the petitioner to obtain transit permit a nd challans for transportation of stones for the purpose of crushing and transpo rtation to different places. It appears that in a similar nature of case, this Court, vide order dated 05.12. 2011, as passed in W.P.(C) No.6040/2011 (M/s Shivam Transcom Stone Crusher vs. T he State of Assam & Ors.), directed the respondent authorities not to insist or demand transit permit or challan for transportation. The present petition is situated similarly and as such this case is also covered by the said order dated 05.12.2011, as such a similar relief is also sought for . In view of this, for ends of justice, the respondents are directed not to insist or demand transit permit or challan for transportation of stone by the petition ers for the purpose of crushing stones and transportation to different places. With this observation and direction, this writ petition shall stands disposed of .