In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M- 1929 of 2009 Date of Decision:April 22, 2009 Ramu Verma ---Petitioner versus State of Haryana ---Respondent Coram: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA *** Present: Mr.B.S.Chaudhary ,Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Sidharth Sarup, AAG, Haryana *** SABINA, J. Ramu Verma-petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'Cr.P.C.) seeking regular bail in F.I.R.No. 134 dated 26.6.2007 under Sections 392/395/397of the Indian Penal Code registered at Police Station Sector-40, Gurgaon. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the complainant was examined as PW-2 during trial and has failed to identify any of the assailants. In other cases registered against the petitioner, he has has been ordered to be released on bail. Petitioner is in custody since 2.8.2007. Crl. Misc. No. M- 1929 of 2009 -2- Learned State counsel has opposed the bail petition. Keeping in view the fact that the complainant has failed to identify the assailants and the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 2.8.2007, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed. Petitioner be admitted to bail subject to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate,Gurgaon. (SABINA) JUDGE April 22, 2009 PARAMJIT