IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41031 of 2008 1. JAGDISH ROY, S/O BISHWANATH ROY, 2. PREMADA DEVI, W/O JAGDISH ROY, 3. PRAMOD KUMAR ROY @ RAI, S/O JAGDISH ROY, 4. MANBODH KUMAR ROY @ RAI, S/O JAGDISH ROY, 5. MANJU DEVI W/O MANBODH KR. ROY @ RAI, 6. SANJEET KUMAR ROY @ RAI S/O JAGDISH ROY. ALL R/O VILLAGE BOARHA, P.S. KISHANPUR, DISTRICT-SUPAUL. -PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR. –OPP.PARTY 2 03.12.2008 The application on behalf of the petitioners no.1 and 6, Jagdish Roy and Sanjeet Kumar Roy @ Rai, has become infructuous since they have been arrested. The complainant has stated in an affidavit that the death of the victim was by snake bite. In the complaint she described the death of the victim in a different way. It was alleged in the complaint that it was a murder. The complaint has been directed to be registered as first information report. In course of investigation it was required to ascertain which version of the complainant is correct. In those circumstances, on the condition that petitioners no.2, 3, 4 and 5, and each one of them shall make themselves available before the Enquiry Officer at 10.30 A.M. on every Monday for at least four consecutive weeks, 2 they are granted anticipatory bail. Let the petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender within six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on each of them furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, in Kishanpur P.S. Case no. 70 of 2004, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Barin Ghosh, J.) AAhmad