-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 7219 OF 2005 M/s. Patil & Company.... ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors... ... Respondents. Mr. S. M. Sabrad for the Petitioner. Mr. P. M. Patil, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM : R. M. LODHA & CORAM : R. M. LODHA & CORAM : R. M. LODHA & NARESH H. PATIL, JJ. NARESH H. PATIL, JJ. NARESH H. PATIL, JJ. DATED : 1ST AUGUST, 2006. DATED : 1ST AUGUST, 2006. DATED : 1ST AUGUST, 2006. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : Heard counsel for the petitioner for some time. 2. In our view the interest of justice will be subserved if the petitioner makes representation to respondent no.2 for redressal of its grievances and the respondent no.2 considers the said representation expeditiously in accordance with the law. 3. We, accordingly, dispose of the writ petition by following order: (a) The petitioner shall make representation to respondent no.2 - The Collector, Solapur for redressal of its grievances. -: 2 :- (b) The Collector, Solapur is expected to take decision on the said representation, after hearing the petitioner, if necessary, expeditiously and preferably within three months from the receipt of the representation. (c) All contentions raised by the petitioner in the writ petition are kept open to be agitated in subsequent proceedings, if necessary. Sd/- (R. M. LODHA, J.) (R. M. LODHA, J.) (R. M. LODHA, J.) Sd/- (NARESH H. PATIL, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)