li«iiUL6: IIENCH (" Ffere IN THE fflGH COURT OF CffiIATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITIONfS)NO. S~tfz5 /^06^ WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION QFINDIA_, PETITIONER »* ^°^yy i^t^Sh-^ <^%^ '^yy ^••' ^y" ./"' .a6'"''. -.••*"- k<' ,'^ESPONDENTS L^-' *0^ Y^^^. 2. .^^ ^. > 2' '•Rame Prasad Paikra, aged about 39 years, son of Shri Baran Sai, Assistant Teacher, Govemment Tribal Primary School Bagdol, Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Depe;'tment of Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Assistant Commissioner, Department of Tribal Welfare, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 3.,- The Block Education officer, Block ^ Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 01. PARTLCULARS ABOUT THE PETITIONTiR Asjier cause title. HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P. f5) No. 903 of 2007 Petitioner : Rame Prusnd Poiikra Versus Re^)ondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh <md others SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Mr. A.N. Bhakta, Advoaite for -riie petitioner. Mr. Satish Supta, Oeputy 6ovt. Advocate for the respondents/Stoite. ORDER (Passed on 25th day of January, 2007) The followmg order of the Court' is passed by Sotish K. Agniho'h'i, J. 1. Leomed counsel cppearing for the petitioner as well as leamed Depirfy Sovemment Advocate. appearing for the respondents/5'tate jointly submit that +he facts of the present cass is similar to that of in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006 (Sushil Tiwari <& pthers Vs. State 6ovt. of Oihattisgwh <S others), tdiich was allowed vide order dated 7*^ November, 2006. They fur'ther submit that the question of law involved is also the same. 2. In view of the above stated aibmissions made by teamed counsel for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order dated 7 Novambsr, 2006 passad by this Court in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006. No order as to costs. __ Bablu Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge