IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 6TH DECEMBER 2011 / 15TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 32173 of 2011(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------- K.P.BINDU,AGED 37 YEARS, W/O.SURESHAN,NARAYANALAYAM,ANJARAKANDI.P.O, KANNUR DISTRICT,H.S.A.(MALAYALAM), MAMBRAM HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THALASSERY-670101. 2. MANAGER,MAMBRAM HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, MAMBRAM.P.O,KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN-670741. 3. DEPUTY HEADMISTRESS,MAMBRAM HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,MAMBRAM.P.O,KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN-670741. BY SR.GOVT.PLEADER SHRI M.A.FAYAZ FOR R1 SHRI P.M.PAREETH FOR R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.(C)No.32173/11 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C)13816/03 DATED 9.12.2009. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HONOURABLE IN W.A.799/2010 DATED 2.6.2010 EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B1/4/10 DATED 6.10.2010 OF THE D.E.O. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE HEADMASTER DATED 10.11.2010. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE DEO DATED 15.11.2010 EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.K.DIS/B1/9984/10 DT.3.11.2010 OF THE DEO. EXT.P7: TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 29.6.2011 EXT.P8: TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN W.P.(C)36397/2010 DT.7.12.10. EXT.P9: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P(C)36397/2010 DATED 23.11.2011. EXT10: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 29.11.2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE dsn T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.32173 of 2011 -------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 6th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner is aggrieved by Exhibit P10 communication issued by the Deputy Headmistress of the school directing her not to put her signature in the attendance register. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent and the learned Government Pleader. 3. The respective of the rights of the petitioner and other teachers who have approved service as High School Assistant (Malayalam) for continuance have to be considered by the District Educational Officer in the light of the judgment in W.P.(C) No.36397/2010 dated 23.11.2011. This Court has considered various aspects therein after hearing the pleas raised by the learned counsel for the Manager also. 4. Since already directions have been issued in Exhibit P9, the same will govern this case also and no separate directions are necessary at this stage. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. Sd/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn