.....^3?s^ ^• ^^-€^r^'---- SiBgI&Benc^^ P^e No< p(eserteib'^^A' dSt6<--" N IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S) N0._'^0^/2006 PETITIONER Smt. Wineeta Choubey _W/o Shri. / Dilip Kumar Choubey, R/o Village - Pipraul, Tahasil-PaI, at present R/o- Ward No. (5), Ramanujganj, District- Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattistarh,/ Through:- The Secretary, Home Department, D.K.S.Bhawa.n,Raipur. (C.G.) . i €^ IM-lCu.^l^. 2. The Collector, District - Surguja at /- Ambikapur (C.G.) . 3. The Chief Executive Officer, / Zila Panchayat, Surguja at Ambika- pur (C.G.) 4. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad ^' T~, Panchayat-Ramchandrapur, (Rama- nujganj), District - Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 3TI^T?iTR-ti<t> (WTSn^Tshliti *11*1MI Sh*11<h 'ysi ^ww^, w-^ww, Rfdiyy .^•.T::^0^!^ _-„-/• ^FT 3TT^?T4aw(yi(^<s)q]iT) STdRP: (rfltT 3f1^T l-9-2006 Sovernnlent Mr. Manoj Mishro, counsel Mr. Vinay Pandey, Panel advancecopy. Heard both the counsel. The case of the petitioner permanent residents of Village: Pj intervenin9 night of 29th <& 30th came to the village and house of familv of the oetitioner sustairl r'egarding that incident was lod9eif per the scheme of the members of the Naxatite affectec) clause 14 of the said scheme, if th|i educated, then he shall be that person shall be considered on Leapned counsel for the for the said post, her cose was a| But the petitioner has come to the ground that she is the dau^t^ the circumstances, learned counse| to make a representation to respc) directed to decide the same, to respondents No.l & 2 has no objec-1 lor Latjiyer Ncjvember, the eliqiblel for pe|tit krlow 4r espcjndent wHich »hiti?i-i<fl-< yift-tT ff te^t <Ri«i< ^siRlJTgn^T the petitioner. for- the State/r-espondents No.l & 2, on is the petitioner and her family members are praul, Tehsil; Pal, District; Surgyja. In the ', 2004 a-ound about 40-50 Naxalites petitioner's fomily was set ablcee in which sd a loss of about Rs.1,50,000/-. F.I.R. ) and copy of the same is Annexure P-l. As issued on 20th October, 2004, family ore entitled for certain concessions. As per e member of the Naxalite affected family is appointment as teacher and the case of the pattem of primitive tribe. titioner submits that the petitioner applied (amined and no final order has been passed. that her case is not being considered on ^r-in-law of the Naxalite affected family. In submits that the petitioner may be altowed No.4 and in turn, respondent No.4 be learned counsel appearing for the State/ tion. P.T.O. XI-HC-78 *11HClTa>»nth 3'sr ^ww^, w^w\6, lsidiy^< ^^.^°7f^ 200 ^ 311^1 Mattl (^ql^sti^ff) SD^T^TR^icb a2II3T^T»*< Soma > B^iraTfff^rw^T •2- reasdnoble Having heord tearned counsep facts and circumstohces of the casls the petitioner is just, fair and to make a detailed representation annexures to respondents No.4 respondent No.4 shall consider the| the State fiovernment policy representation of the petitioner from the date of receipt of the reptf With the direction aforesaidj Parties ar-e entitled for certi'l for the parties and havin9 re9ard to the s, the pr'ayer made by learned counsel for '.. Therefore, the petitioner is allowed along with a copy of this petition and its (aithin two weeks from toda/, in turn I case of the petitioner in accordance with d|ited 20tb October, 2004, decide the pass order within a period of 60 days ptfesentation. the petition stands disposed of. Fied copy of this order. ^—-'""" add °bl'i|t<-l<fl-l ^WvK ff fe<^t'<Rl»K ^aTf^Tsn^T SAi- ,.c.^au v"^e AO° P.T.O.