1 cri-w.p.1991-10 mgn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1991 OF 2010 Mr. Rafik J. Kaldoria ..Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U.D.SALVI, JJ. DATED: 1st February, 2011 P.C. We have heard Mr. Parmar, the learned Counsel for the petitioner and we have also perused his representation dated 30th June, 2010 addressed to the Commissioner of Police, Greater Mumbai and two other Police Officers concerned with the concerned Police Station as well as E.O.W. of Mumbai Police. 2. If the petitioner has a grievance against any individual acts of any 2 cri-w.p.1991-10 police officer in regard to the acts contrary to the provisions of Cr.P.C., and more particularly Sections 91 to 93 of Cr.P.C., he may submit a representation accordingly to the concerned Deputy Commissioner of Police, who in turn may enquire into such a complaint regarding the conduct of the police officer concerned and take appropriate action. 3. The petition is, therefore, disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation to the concerned D.C.P, and if such a representation is submitted within a period of two weeks from today we direct that the investigation be done and appropriate action as may be required be taken within six weeks. 4. This order will not have any effect on the petitioner’s challenge to the order passed by the Magistrate. Petition stands disposed off. (U.D.SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)