IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 5124 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision : May 11, 2009 Ram Karan Petitioner Versus M/s. Harnam Dass Des Raj Commission Agents Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present: Mr. Sanjay Verma, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Brijender Kaushik, Advocate for respondent No. 1 A.N. JINDAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner/defendant (herein referred to the petitioner) has submitted certain documents to prove that the respondent suing on behalf of the partnership firm was not the actual partner of the firm M/s. Harnam Dass Des Raj Commission Agents at the time of filing the suit. Certainly if he was not the partner then he could not sue as such. Since it is the duty of the respondent to prove the partnership deed, the registration certificate as well as list of the partners during trial. Therefore, this application for additional evidence is dismissed. (A.N.JINDAL) 11.05.2009 JUDGE reena