(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4488 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4488 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4488 OF 2004 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2004 The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ...Applicant Versus Ainash Krishna Nikam & Anr ...Respondents ..... Mr. H. Pimpale, Advocate for Applicant Mr. R.J. Pande, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. D.P. Adsule, A.P.P. for State. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. DATED: 28TH JUNE, 2005 DATED: 28TH JUNE, 2005 DATED: 28TH JUNE, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. Heard both sides. 2. Sufficient cause has been made out for condonation of delay in filing Criminal Appeal, hence, the delay is condoned. 3. Application is disposed of. *****