F.A.O. No.175 of 2007 31.08.2015 Mr.A.Mishra, learned, counsel for the appellant submits that the decree on which the S .R. has pointed out that Rs.2.50 is to be paid. But the decree relates to C.S. No.306 of 2006, which does not relate to the present appeal. Hence, defect pointed out in this regard is igno red. Office is directed to remove the Decree in Original Suit which is wrongly annexed to t his appeal. Though office note of the present appeal reveals that the appeal having been filed und er Section 96 of CPC is to be heard by Division Bench, but since the same is being heard by the Single Ben ch, defect in this regard is ignored. K.R. Mohapatra, J. 2