..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3175 OF 2008 Asha Rajendran Nair. ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. .... Mr.S.V.Marwadi, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.S.S.Pednekar, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 23rd September, 2008. DATED : 23rd September, 2008. DATED : 23rd September, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in C.R.No.218 of 2008 of Kherwadi Police Station. The said case is mainly under Sections 465, 467 of IPC. 3. It is the prosecution case that the applicant submitted bogus certificate regarding her caste and tried to obtain a flat in MHADA. The learned Advocate for the applicant states that the flat has already been surrendered to MHADA and ..(2).. the applicant is not claiming refund of the amount of Rs.15,91,000/- paid by the applicant to MHADA for the said flat. 4. The learned APP states that the investigation is also being carried out by MHADA authorities. Hence, he states that if the investigating agency wants the custody of the applicant, they will give the applicant 72 hours written notice prior to her arrest. The said statement is accepted. If such notice is served on the applicant, the applicant shall move the concerned Sessions Court. The concerned Sessions Court shall hear the matter and decide it on merits. 5. With the above observations, Criminal Application is disposed of. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)