e^m / ^) C^? \ e^_ k'ET;ES6A^t;A;y WMET t., 3 S^, ^2£«& ^.Snt- fesham ASadJiutor. W/o. Slari' JJi. UcrihtAaB^. Agettabau*. 4S years,, R/o- Pt. Oindayal Ufwdhyay Ncgar. HIfi- 2/74, Sectop-Q4, CStBgaittyai. Raigtu' VERais RESPONDENTS ..<• .^ff>: ^^B^ ^^ ^-1, State ofChhattisgarh. Throt^ tha SacFetoipy^ '' Education &epartment, OXS. Bhawan Mantralaya^ Raifw (C.6-) ^2. TheAdditional t)jrect®r, : PtUie. Educationy P&nsion Bada, Raipur (C.&.) ^ 3. Thfe &istric.t EctucfttiMkQfficer, Raipur(C.&) 4. The. Chief Executiv&Oificei-,, fijstrict Panchqyat, Raipjr (C.G.) WKCT: BETIl:K:!fe^UNI EfcAKH£yE,^^^^^ 1. t ?'HC—78 siT^r-qiift^Rr ^W <i11^l Stt^W 's^ •^)'4i<Ti<<; ^•rfl'y'l^, f«<di'yy ^T^^-^-^^-^^20^ 3n^rTRH? (yilyi^) i^nw ^ifta 3n^?( SB : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICfl Tiwati Shri Anajid Kuiaar Shri Sumesh Bajaj, G.A. Challeage ia the presei|it petition is to the order dated respoitident 25.6.2009 passed by Officer, Raipur by which the post of Lecturer (Economlcsjl Goveranieut Higher Secondari Secondaiy School, Mandhar No.4 i.e. Chief Executive betitioner who is working on fhe has been traasferred fi-oxa the School, Raipura to Govt. Higher C()lony, Dharsiwa. Contention of counsel petitioner has been traasferr^ lecturerwhereas ta fact fhe are nuiaber of ofher iuaiors ^ treated as surplus lecturers. He submits that the traasfe^ respondent No.4 whereas the under the law to issue the pouited out fhat the petitio^ (Aiinexure P/4) but no representation. acticjn cbl'irfii-PTt'T ^(T*t<?ff ^f fssil <P>ft$r< i?3ifinan^i i; counscl for the petitioner. forfhe Stats/'resp. No. 1 to 3. for the petitioner is that the -^d showiag her to be a siirplus pe(itioner is not a surplus and there I'ho have ioraed later can oillv be ^ . order has been issued bv fhe said auth.ority is not eaipoweied raasfer order. It has also been ler had inade a repiesentation has been taken. on the said B' Couusel for fhe petiti^ner subnuts that he niay be permitted to withdraw fhe pr ;sent petiti.eu wifh. liberty to file -1-- -•-^^^ •' 'E6ae"?!ii^ 1 VSSM,- 9 ••'^^f ''"asss"XI-HC—78 311^1 ^TR'fl'fi 7T^T 3TI^?T S¥)*li<ft •<v/ As. T @) '3^ •^l^lcl'4, a-aly'i®,(sxni'My M.B..Cs)...^x2;a.j. :Hi*«ni a>*ii<»» ( 3n^rxia^(1pf3^q) C«i)ii3Tyf?a 3il^?f issilied representation to fhe State fhat a direction inay be issi decide fhe representation so atlowed to perform her duti.es <|joveminent. He- fiirfher subiuits to the State Govemnient to inade aad tiU then he inay be fhe present place of postmg. Sa Leamed couiisel for fhle petitioner inakes a represent£|1 fhe sam.e is decided expeditioujsly State has no obiection. if tbe |tion to ttie respoudent No.4 aad Accordingly, fhe petitio^ fhe aforesaid liberty. In th^ inakiiig such representation receipt of this order, fhe aufhorities wifhin a period of| receipt. It is clarified fhat till| relleved from. fhe present p|l reMeved. ^I^Jd^t'i 'RR^ff ^f fsl<1 <f^R^)^ ^sifinsii^i is disinissed as withdi-awn with eventuality of the petitioner's ten days froia fhe date of would be decided by the fhree weeks froin fhe date of its tiien the petitioner shail not be .ace of postuig, if not alrcady s&Die Sd/- Pritmker Diwakar ^ Judge 4- /-