IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19239 of 2010 1. KRISHNA YADAV 2. Sheonath Yadav 3. Brija Yadav 4. Tun-Tun Yadav 5. Rudal Yadav 6. Barma Yadav @ Brahma Yadav Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 09.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Injuries do not justify rejection of anticipatory bail. Land dispute is there in between the parties. Earlier a case was filed on behalf of the petitioner no.2 against the informant’s party. Certainly, a vague allegation is made about abuse in name of informant’s cast by all the petitioners but that is specific on petitioner no. 2. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner no.2 is rejected and at the same time, prayer of the petitioners no. 1 and 3 to 6 is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Vaishali (Hajipur S.C./S.T.) P.S. Case No. 100 of 2010, above named petitioners no. 1 and 3 to 6 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Siwan subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. However, petitioner no.2 is directed to surrender before the Court below and pray for regular bail which shall be decided on 2 its own merit without being prejudiced by this rejection order preferably on the same day. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)