GPN-J.332-ARCHB-8.94-1310500-ALA4 Spl-H.C.A.S.C.D.79e FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 846 OF 2002 APPLICATION NO. 846 OF 2002 APPLICATION NO. 846 OF 2002 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 825 OF 2002 WITH CIVIL APPICATION NO. 1905 OF 2004 IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1542 OF 1987 PETITION NO. 1542 OF 1987 PETITION NO. 1542 OF 1987 ------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. -------------------------------------------------------- None for the Applicant. Ms. Supriya Khanzode i/by S.A. Joshi for Respondent No. 1. Mr. A.H. Palekar, A.G.P. for Respondent No. 5. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO,J. DATED : JANUARY 20, 2005 P.C. . The relief sought for by the petitioner in the petition is that there cannot be reservation in the matter of institutions run by linguistic and religious minorities. That petition came to be dismissed on 21.10.1994. The application for setting aside the said order was moved only on 25.3.2002 by the petitioner. . One more application was filed being Application No. 845 of 2002 where again relief for setting aside the order dated 20.10.1994 was sought. Thus first application was for condonation of delay and the second application is for restoration. . The third application sought review of the order dated 20.2.2004 being C.A. No. 845 of 2002 wherein it was set out that the matter be placed for final hearing in third week of July, 2004. . None appears for the applicants when the matter is called out. Even otherwise, delay has not been satisfactorily explained. Rights have accrued to the respondents and in these circumstances, Civil Applications along with Application for review stands disposed off. (F.I. REBELLO,J.)