IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6663 of 2008 Date of decision : 20.1.2010 Rajinder Kumar and another ....Petitioner Versus Ladies Industrial Home Sewa Samiti Kunjpura Road, Karnal ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. J.K.Goel, Advocate for the petitioners. S. D. ANAND, J. The respondent society had been served for appearance before this Court on 5.10.2009. However, none entered appearance on behalf of the respondent society on that date. It was on that date only that the learned counsel for the petitioner announced to the Court that “there might be some compromise between the parties.” On the adjourned date i.e. 6.1.2010, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners informed the Court that he did have an impression that the parties may well have come to terms. However, he sought time to ascertain the correct position. In the context of that averment, learned counsel for the petitioner informed the Court that though he had already addressed the petitioner in the context, he had not yet received any response. He wanted further time to have instructions in the context. It was agreed by the learned counsel that if no response was received on the next date of hearing, he would either withdraw this petition or address arguments on merits. Learned counsel informs that inspite of his having addressed a communication to the petitioner, he has not got any response thereto. In that view of things, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Disposed of accordingly. January 20, 2010 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE