THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM C.R.P.No. 929 of 2011. ORDER: This revision is directed against the order dt. 21.02.2011 in E.P.No. 42 of 2010 in O.S.No. 117 of 2004 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Pithapuram. The E.P. was filed by the 1st respondent/decree holder for execution of the decree for Rs. 9,22,831/-awarded in O.S.No. 117 of 2004 alternatively for the relief of specific performance sought by the plaintiff/decree holder. Earlier, the execution petitioner filed E.P.No. 65 of 2007 for realisation of the decreetal debt and the said E.P. was dismissed for default. As the decreetal debt remained un-discharged despite the judgement debtor having adequate means, the present E.P. was filed. By the order impugned, the court below held that the execution petitioner by way of documentary evidence proved that the revision petitioner who is the Judgement debtor is having sufficient means apart from immovable properties yet failed to discharge the decreetal amount and therefore ordered arrest of the revision petitioner. As the court below had categorically found and on cogent analysis of the material on record, that the revision petitioner is having sufficient means apart from movable and immovable properties and yet failed to discharge the decreetal debt, no case for inference is therefore made out in this revision petition. The revision petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 10.6.2011. KRB. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM C.R.P.No. 929 of 2011. ORDER: Dt. 10.6.2011.