IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 8TH JANUARY 2010 / 18TH POUSHA 1931 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 104 of 2010() -------------------- CC.196/2009 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT, KODUNGALLUR .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): 1ST ACCUSED. --------------------------------- SHAJI, S/O.VIJAYAN, VADAKKOTT HOUSE, KARUPADANNA, THEKKUMKARA. BY ADV. SRI.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN SRI.K.S.RAJESH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. P.R. JAYAKRISHNAN THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Crl.R.P. No. 104 of 2010 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 8th day of January, 2010 ORDER The revision petitioner who is the accused in C.C. No. 196 of 2009 on the file of the J.F.C.M., Kodungallur challenges the order dated 6-11-2009 passed by the Magistrate dismissing his application for personal exemption. In his application the petitioner had not stated that he would not dispute the capacity of the witnesses to identity him and he also did not seek permission to his counsel to represent him in his absence. This probably persuaded the Magistrate to dismiss the application. Hence, I do not find any good ground to interfere with the said order. However, the dismissal of this revision will not preclude the petitioner from moving the Magistrate again for personal exemption with appropriate averments. This Cril.R.P. is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) ani. /true copy/ P.A. to Judge