THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 222 of 2011. ORDER: Notice before admission was ordered on 11.2.2011 and the learned Counsel for the petitioners was permitted to take out notices on the respondents by registered post acknowledgement due. Notices have been served on the respondents 1 and 2 and Sri.L.Jagannadham filed vakalath for the respondents and though his name is reflected in the cause list, he is not present at the admission hearing. Sri.E.V.V.S.Ravi Kumar, the learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have acquired title to the suit schedule property through E.P.No. 151 of 2002 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada as the legal representatives of the 4th defendant in the suit O.S.No. 238 of 1978 filed for partition of suit schedule properties. The properties were delivered to the petitioners and consequently E.P. No. 151 of 2002 was closed. As the respondents herein claimed to be the cultivating tenants of the property whose possession was delivered to the revision petitioners, the revision petitioners filed ATC.No. 4 of 2007 for eviction of the respondents and the said ATC was allowed on 18.8.2008. Aggrieved thereof, the respondents filed ATA.No. 21 of 2008 before the III Additional District Judge, East Godavari and obtained stay of execution of the order in ATC No. 4 of 2007. The substantive grievance of the petitioners is that ATA.No. 21 of 2008 is being interminably adjourned since October, 2008 and mostly at the instance of the Counsel for the appellants/respondents herein. It is stated that the tenancy appeal was adjourned to 23.2.2011 and from 23.2.2011 it was adjourned to a date in June 2011. The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are deprived of their legitimate expectations to possession and enjoyment of the property owned by them on account of indefinite adjournments of ATA.No. 21 of 2008. In the facts and circumstances of the case adverted to above, this Court considers it appropriate to dispose of this revision directing the learned III Additional District, Kakinada to dispose of the ATA.No. 21 of 2008 expeditiously and in any case within a period of four months from today. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 30.4.2011. KRB. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 222 of 2011. ORDER: Dt. 30.4.2011.