( 1 ) WP 11692/10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11692 OF 2010 Shri Sai Sarvajanik Vachanalaya, Krushnapur, Post Bidkin, Taluka Paithan, District Aurangabad, Through its it’s President Shri Gangadhar s/o Deorao Waghchaure, Age 52 years, Occ. Social Work & President, Resident of Krushnapur, Post Bidkin, Taluka Paithan, District Aurangabad PETITIONER V E R S U S 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through The Secretary, Technical & Higher Technical Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai. 2. The Deputy Director of Librarian, Aurangabad Region, Aurangabad. RESPONDENTS Mr. K.N. Lokhande, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. G.R. Ingole Patil, AGP for respondents / State CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE & A.V. NIRGUDE,JJ. DATED : 9th March, 2011 ORAL ORDER : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The principal prayer in the writ petition is as follows : “B) That, by way of writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or directions in the like nature, the respondent no. 2 may kindly be directed to visit and make the inspection of the petitioner’s Library and submit the Report / proposal to the respondent No.1 for further necessary action.” 3. The petitioners have stated that they have submitted proposal to ( 2 ) WP 11692/10 respondent No. 2 on 31st May, 2010. The petitioners are not aware, whether respondent No. 2 has examined his proposal and forwarded the same to the State Government for its approval. In view thereof and having considered the prayer in the writ petition, we are satisfied that this petition can conveniently be disposed of by the following order : ORDER 1. The respondent No. 2 shall consider and examine the proposal submitted by the petitioner on 31st May, 2010 (Exhibit - C of the writ petition) and if it is found to be in prescribed form and complies with all the requirements, may forward it with his recommendation to the State Government for appropriate decision as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order. After the proposal is forwarded to respondent No.1 by respondent No. 2, we hope that the State Government shall take decision on the proposal made by the petitioner expeditiously. 2. While passing this order, we shall not be understood to have issued any direction either to respondent No.2 or to respondent No.1 on merits of the case. The respondents are expected to take decision on merits in accordance with Law. 3. With these observations, Writ Petition stands disposed of. ( A. V. NIRGUDE,J. ) ( D.B. BHOSALE,J. ) SRM/