Tumane PETITIONER Learned counsei forthe petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withqiraw this writ petition on the ground that the petition has become infructuous. (2) No objection from the other side. :(3) in \Iiew of above, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. ‘ HIGH COURT OF CHHAT ISGARH : BILASPUR» WRIT PETITION (S) I\IO.1 864 OF 2009 Prakash Narayan Singh Veysus x The Assistant P.F. Commissioner (Pensiorr) and another Writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Shri Pradeep Saxena, counsel for respondent No.1. ORAL ORbER -’¢_""‘—‘_"—1 r Sd/- t Satish K. Agnihotri ‘ v. Judge i i i RESPONpENTs Present: - Shri R. K. Jaiswal‘ counset for the petitioner. (Passedson this 26‘” day of October, 2009)