IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.556 of 2009 RAM PAL SINGH SON OF SUBBA SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE POJHI BUJURG, POLICE STATION MARHOWARH, DISTRICT SARAN AT CHAPRA. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRAGE, SARAN AT CHAPRA 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SARAN AT CHAPRA. 4. SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE MORHOWRAH SARAN AT CHAPRA. 5. SUB-DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE MORHOWRAH, SARAN AT CHAPRA. 6. OFFICER-IN-CHARAGE MORHORAH POLICE STATION SARAN AT CHAPRA. 7. CIRCLE OFFICER, MORHOWRAH, SARAN AT CHAPRA 8. YADU BANSHI RAI SON OF DEO SARAN RAI 9. NAGENDRA RAI SON OF LATE RAM SARAN RAI. 10. RAM NATH SINGH SON OF LATE PARMA SINGH 11. SHYAM SINGH SON OF LATE BHUKHAL SINGH. 12. DHARAM NATH SINGH SON OF LATE RAM KEWAL SINGH 13. MANGAL SINGH SON OF LATE RAM KEWAL SINGH RESPONDENT NO. 8 TO 13 ARE RESIDENT OFVILLAGE POJHI BUJURG, POLICE STATION MARHOWRAH, DISTRICT SARAN AT CHAPRA. ----------- 4 13.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 4 and 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the property in question as mentioned in paragraph 4 and 5 has been declared to be the property of the petitioner in the civil proceeding. The petitioner has filed an execution case for executing the decree. However, the private respondents are creating hurdles in execution. Considering the facts and circumstances of the 2 case and submission of the parties, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The writ application stands disposed of. Amrendra/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)