:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1819 OF 2005 The State of Maharashtra ... Applicant versus Naresh Narayan Kohli ... Respondent ... Mr.A.S. Gadkari, A.P.P., for the Applicant. Mr.A.H.H. Ponda, for the Respondent. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 21st April 2005 P.C.: . In terms of direction given in order dated April 13, 2005, the learned A.P.P. fairly accepts that the Respondent reported to the investigating officer and has also furnished all the relevant documents and co-operated for the purpose of investigation of this case. In this backdrop, the grievance made in the present application is taken care of. The application, :2: therefore, deserves to be disposed of with direction to the Respondent to continue to co-operate for the purpose of investigation and report to the investigating officer as and when called upon. In case of any default committed by the Respondent, it will be open to the Applicant to move this Court for cancellation of bail afresh. Learned A.P.P. on instructions states that whenever presence of the Respondent is required, the investigating officer will give at least 72 hours’ advance notice to the Respondent in that behalf. . Ordered accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)