Miirlidhar Chaadra, s/o Shri Udit Rani Cliandra, aged about 45 years, Occupation, Sub-Engineer posted at Jaupad Paacliayat, Nagri, District- Dhamtari(CG) State of Chhattisgarh, Through fhe Secretaiy Departm.ent of Panchayat a&d Rural Developinent, DKS Bhawaa, Raipur, District- Raipur(CG) Joiut Secretarv State of Chliattisgai'h, Departin.ent of Paachayat and Rural Developiaent Raipur, District-Raipur(CG) CoUector, Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari(CG) Chief Executi.ve OfScer, District Pancliayat, Dhatatari, District- Dhamtai-i(CG) (. Shri Suiul Saliu, counsel for the'petitioner. Shri Yashwant Siagh, Govenunent Advocate for tlie State on advance copy. i1A,J, on aamission. The petitioner, who is workuig as a Sub-Eagiaeer in Jaiipad Paachayat, Nagri, District-Dhamtari, has chaUenged his traiisfer order dated 27;6.2007 (Anaexure P-1), whereby, the petitioner has been traiisfen'ed froin the said place to Janpad Panchayat, Basna, District-Mahasaiaund on adiainistrative Lcamed coiinsel for tiie petitioner argued that iii fact, there were certam coinplamts from. tlie leaders of Bhartiya Janata Party, ftierefore, the petitioner has been trartsferred aad the said traiisfer appears to be inalafide. (2) A perusal of tiie order would show that fhe petitioner has not been transferred on coinplaints, but it appears to be a siiaple traasfer on adintaistrati.ve grounds. The ground regardiag complaiats, as is tateen by ttie petitioner, does not appear to be reasonable. As laid down by fhe Apex Court in laaay cases, fhe traasfer is aa exigency of sen'ice and nobody can claim. for posting at a particular place during the course of his tenure. The eiuployer is the best judge regarding postuig of a particular employee at a particular place aad unless it is slioxvn by taking reasonable grouads fhat the traasfer is affected by xaala&de or by extraaeous consideration or is vitiated by tlie provisions of any statutoiy Rules or the Act, the sanie are not to be mterfered by the Court of law m. ordinary aiid general DaaaneT. After goiag throiigh tlie contents of the petiti.cn as also the inipugiied order, I do not God any force ia fhe arguineats advanced by leanied counsel for die petitioner. The petition has uo nierits. The saine is dism.issed at tlie in.otion stage itself. Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge ^unita