BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HELD AT HIGH COURT PATNA CWJC No.13959 of 2008 Petitioner :BASUDEO BHAGAT Respondent :THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashok Kumar Keshri For the S t a t e: Ms. Anita Sinha, G.P.9. For the Accountant General: Mr. J.P. Karn & Mr. Ajit Kumar Present:- Member(Judicial) :Mr. Justice S.K.Katriar Member(Legal Profession) : Mrs. Nilu Agrawal, Advocate AWARD The dispute between the parties having been referred for determination to the Lok Adalat and the parties having compromised/ settled the case/matter, the following award is passed in terms of the settlement: The petitioner superannuated from the services of the Bihar Government with effect from 30.6.2008 when he was posted as Sub-divisional Officer, Irrigation Sub-Division, Sarsi (Purnea). The petitioner raises the grievance that the proceeds of the general provident fund, the differential amount of leave encashment as per the revised pay scales, and the differential amount of salary as per the revised pay-scales recommended by the 6th Pay Commission have not been paid to him. The respondents have placed on record their counter affidavit. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the proceeds of the general provident fund shall be paid to the petitioner within a period of three months, along with the interest at the statutory and the prevalent rates from the date of deposits till the date of payment, within a period of three months. Learned counsel for the parties further jointly submit that, in view of issuance of pay-slips, the differential amount of leave encashment, and the differential amount of salary, shall be disbursed to the petitioner within a period of three months without the obligation of payment of interest. Respondent no.6 (The District Provident Fund Officer, Purnea) shall ensure implementation of the terms of the compromise in so far as payment of the proceeds of the general provident fund is concerned. Respondent no.3 (The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Purnea) shall ensure implementation of the terms of the compromise in so far as the differential amount of leave encashment and the differential amount of salary as per the revised pay-scales are concerned. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the compromise. The parties are informed that the court fee, if any, paid by any of them shall be refunded. ___________________ Petitioner/Petitioner's representative) ___________________ Respondent/Respondent's representative) (S.K.Katriar) (Nilu Agrawal), Advocate Member(Judicial) Member(Legal Profession) Date :01-05-2010 (Seal of the Authority)