THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.25010 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner was appointed as Conductor, on casual basis, vide orders dated 27.10.1985, along with 72 others. His services were regularized with effect from 17.11.1986. However, one of the conductors, appointed along with him, by name N.S.Narayana, was regularized with effect from 27.10.1985 i.e. the date of initial appointment. The grievance of the petitioner is that similar treatment was not accorded to him. He submitted a representation, dated 03.03.2009, in this regard. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. If the petitioner and the other Conductor, by name N.S.Narayana, are appointed through the same order, on casual basis, there is no reason why the services of the petitioner were regularized with effect from the subsequent date. Across the Bar, it is stated that Narayana was removed from service, and thereafter, he was reinstated. If that be so, the petitioner stands on a higher footing. These, however, are matters that need to be taken into account by the respondents. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to pass orders on the representation, dated 03.03.2009, submitted by the petitioner, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Dt:15.09.2011. GJ