. "‘¥ .... .{ZH COURT OF JUD!CATUR£ AT §!LASPUR CHHATT!SG£?;E- WDNQ. [25'8 /2006 Tamn Dewangan, Aged about Z8 years, (”S/o. Kn‘shnata( Dewangan, R/o‘ V‘iKtage Bhairamgarh; ‘ Tahsi'l Bijapur, Diistn‘ct Dantewada (CG) gmgt imam RESPONDEN'TS : 11 State of Chhattisgarh; / Threugh: Secretary, Tribal Welfare Deptt. D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CGg) PETITIONER VERSUS 2H Collector, Dantewada, Distt Dakshin Bastar; Dantewada (EG) N‘ l.._ l. w tl.._. Director, Panchayat and Gramin Vikas Vibhag, Ch‘hattisgarh; Raipur, District Raipur (CG) Chief Executive Janpad Panchayat; Bhairamgarh, Diistrict Dantewada (CG) Block Education Officer, Jéanpad Panchayat, Bhairamgarh, Dtstrict g Dantewada (CG) Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Dantewada, Diistn’ct Dantewada (CG) \féVRF!’ PETIT!0N UNDER ARTICLE 226.1227 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA u, 7 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon’hle Shri Satish K. Agnjhotri, J. W. P. No. 1258 OF 2006 Shri Manoj Paranjps, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sunil Otwani, panel lawyer for the respondents. ORAL ORDER (25¢ March, 2006) 1. This petition challenges the impugned order dated 30.11.2005, (Annextue P—8), passed by the nespondent' No.5, whemby the Ohicer Incharge of Primary School Karkawada, Block Bhairamgarh, District Dantewada, has been directed that the order dated 20.10.2005, (Annexure P-5), passed by the Janpad Panchayat, Bhaimmgarh, appointing Shiksha Karmi, Grade—III, be not given edect to Without permission of District Collector, Dantewada. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was duly selected and appointed as Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, vide onier dated 20.10.2005 (Annexure P- 5), passed by the respondent No.6. 3. The petitioner was informed that the entire selection r process appointing Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, has been cancelled. It is further contended that the petitioner has not received any written information as yet about cancellation of the selection proceedings, or his appointment. 4. v Learned counsel appearing for the respondents No. 1, 2 and 3, submits that the petitioner has never joined pursuant to ‘xv Petitioner : Tarun Dewangan Versus Respondents : » State of Chhattisgarh 85 Others. vi his selection and appointment as Shiksha Karmi, Grade-III. It was further submitted that since the entire selection proceedings have been quashed and new selection process has been initiated, the petitioner does not have any right to the appointment. . Be that as it may, learned counsel for the petih'oner submits that the petitioner has made a representation, (Annexm‘e P-. 10 and Annexure P—ll) to the Secretary Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and Backwaxd Classes, Welfare Department, Government of Chhattisgarh, therefore, the respondents may be directed to decide the said representation within a stipulated period. . Having heard learned counsel for the parties, in the facts ‘ and circumstances of the case, the iespondents are directed to consider and decide the representation (Annexule P— 10 and Annexurev P—ll), in accordance with law, within a period of three weeks, from the date of receipt] production of copy of this order. . In view of foregoing, this petition stands disposed of. No Sdl— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge older as to costs. u"I\ i \