16. smcp 4-11.doc RMA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. SUO MOTU PETITION NO. 4 OF 2011 IN CRI. MISC. APPLICATION NO. 91 OF 2011 IN CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 2903 OF 2010 WITH CRI. MISC. APPLICATION NO. 91 OF 2011 High Court on Its Own Motion .. Applicant Vs Vinoo S. Munshi, Director of Maple Tree Property Pvt Ltd .. Respondent Mr. Bhavesh Parmar i/b Ms. Sandhya Mailagir for the Applicant Mr. D.H. Mehta a/w Dhaval Mehta & Ashish Chavan for Respondent No. 1 Mr. Y.S. Shinde, APP for the State CORAM : P.V. HARDAS & N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 7th MARCH, 2011. PER COURT: 1. A Division Bench of this Court issued notice on 23rd February 2011 in the light of the statement made at paragraph 22 of the Complaint which the Division Bench found to be misleading and not in conformity with the observations made by the Division Bench in its earlier order dated 1st December 2010. 2. The contemner has filed an affidavit in reply and in the affidavit to the contempt notice, the contemner has tendered unconditional apology. We have perused the affidavit in reply 1 16. smcp 4-11.doc which contains the unconditional apology. We find that the apology is genuine and there is no reason whatsoever for not accepting the said unconditional apology. The learned Counsel for the contemner further states that the contemner would file appropriate application on behalf of the contemner as undertaking to the Court. 3. We accordingly accept the unconditional apology and discharge the notice of contempt which has been issued by this Court. Criminal Suo Motu Contempt Petition No. 4 of 2011 is accordingly disposed of. 4. In the light of this order, Criminal Misc. Application No. 91 of 2011 also stands disposed of. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J ] [ P.V. HARDAS, J ] 2 16. smcp 4-11.doc 3