IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH * * * * * LPA No. 1097 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 25.7.2011 * * * * * Punjab State Transmission Corporation Ltd. and others ..........Appellants Versus Balkaran Singh and others ..........Respondents * * * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH * * * * * Present: Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. P.S Hundal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Kodan, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr. Aman Chaudhary, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? M.M KUMAR, J. The instant appeal is directed against the interim order dated 18.5.2011 directing the authorities to maintain status quo passed by the learned Single Judge. However, at the outset, Mr. Chatrath learned counsel for the appellant seeks that he would not like to press the appeal and prays that the matter be ordered to be heard at some early actual date. Mr. Hundal, learned senior Advocate for the writ petitioner-respondent states that let the matter be heard on 23.8.2011. On the basis of the aforesaid agreement of the parties, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. ( M.M KUMAR ) JUDGE July 25, 2011 ( GURDEV SINGH ) ritu JUDGE