Crl.M.No. M- 9151 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M.No. M- 9151 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 19.12.2011 ... Parveen and others ................Petitioners vs. State of Haryana and another .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. Gaurav Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners Sh. Manish Deswal, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Sh. Lalit Kumar Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.2. ... K.C. Puri, J. This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing FIR No. 20 dated 20.1.2011, under Sections 313, 316, 343, 307, 384, 406, 498 A, 201 and 120-B/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Kurukshetra University Kurukshetra, District Kurukshetra, on the basis of compromise. Final report and reply has been filed. The report of the trial Court was called for. The report has been received in which it is mentioned that compromise has been Crl.M.No. M- 9151 of 2011 -2- arrived at between the parties. Counsel for the complainant is also present and has stated at the Bar that as per compromise Annexure A-1, the amount has been received by the complainant and she is fully satisfied. The other litigation i.e. in the shape of divorce and petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C., has already been settled. Affidavit of respondent No.2 Manisha has also been placed on the file, in which it is mentioned that parties have arrived at a compromise. Learned State counsel has stated at the Bar that prima facie offence under Section 307 IPC is not attracted. This is a matrimonial dispute, which has been amicably settled. So, in view of compromise and in view of authority reported as Kulwinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and others 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the abovesaid FIR stands quashed. Further proceedings, in pursuant to that FIR also stand quashed. ( K.C. Puri ) 19.12.2011 Judge chugh