WP(C) 903/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA. heard Mr. J.I. Borbuiya, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr. B. G ogoi, learned Standing Counsel, Health. The matter relates to the appointment to the post of Basic Health Worker in the particular selection conducted. The petitioner No.1 has been shown to have se cured 78 marks and the petitioner No.2 has been shown to have secured 74 out of 100. The cut off marks being 79, the petitioners could not succeed in the writ ten test. According to the petitioners, there was wrong totaling of marks becaus e of not awarding marks by the examiner to the correct answers and the re-evalua tion has been conducted by the Dibrugarh University. Mr. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel, Health by producing the records, fairly sub mits that in fact, the petitioner No.1 has secured 79 marks and not 78 marks and the petitioner has secured 80 marks and not 74 and thus, the petitioners will b e selected for final selection the cut off marks being 79. He submits that the m istake has occurred due to wrong calculation of the marks secured by the petitio ner. In view of the above, the writ petition is allowed with a direction to the respo ndents to include the petitioners in the select list at appropriate place. As th e cut off mark is 79 for appointment and the petitioners had secured 79 and 80, they should be included in the select list for appointment for the posts of Basi c Health Worker without any delay. Writ petition is allowed.