^T^.... ^S^^C—JS sn^T ^T (^iw WyT3?iI^?Tst»*iicn WNCTI (1»NI<1» '?:Sf r^l^ld<LI/^Ti1l<H^I<o, (^KrlKrl^ ^^.........^.^)...2:I2^...^'^2003 3^T 'q^RT (^li^^) ^K1W< W^^l Sinale Bench; Hon'U WJ (Petition U/A 226 of he Constitution of India) Petitioner Tika ^am Sahu, S/o Delu Ram Sahu, Aged abput| 38 years, Upper bivision Teacher, Goverjiment Primary School, batrengi, Vikas Khand|-Bhatapara, bistt. Raipur- (C.G.), R/o Sharnla Colony, Subhash Ward, Bhatapara, Distt.|Raipur(Ce) Vs RESPON&ENTS Sta-( Seci Man' The Chhc Raip The Raip 06.2.2009 Mr. beepak Jain, Advoc Mr. Ajay Dwivediy Dy. & Heard. The petitioner, who wa of Assistant Teacher in the the State Government, is a< r(»<;pnnrfpfi+<; in int nrfrfinQ <sbl^id^1T1 *ii*i<riT ^f fsA<l <Fai^i< ^3^fim3TT^T le Mr. Justice Dhirendra Mishra) 737/2009 e of Chhattisgarh, Through, The 'etary bepartment of Education, 1-ralaya, b.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director Public Instruction, ittisgarh Government Raipur, Di^tt. ^ (C.G.) District Education Officer, bistt. ^r (C.G.) ite for the petitioner. )vt. Advocate for the State. initiallyappointed on the post chool Education Department of igrieved by the action of the wo advance increments in hifl ^ < ,^^""^ ^ I^HC—78 37I^tWfqiw TOT 3T1^?T sFTri?F ^ '^oET ^i*ii<yi<4, ^•<ii-y<i<o, t^iray. «11*«CrllWHicn' 'TR^ZOO 3n^?I <q^W (yl^^) ^[TWR^n^TT^r •^. salary even though he did ^ expenses before joining on t| Learned counsel for 1 petitioner's case is squarelyj in W.P. (s) No.591/200B others Versus The State of this Court and this petition direction given by this Court in| The above fact has not| for the State. In view of above, the im a direction to the responderil increments to the petitioner within a period two months fro|n be subject to all verifications pleaded in the petition. No ord| Certified copy as per rul^s. 4>114id^1T1 'Hffl?ff ^f ft^t Tf^R?R '^3^Rm3TT^T is B.Ed. Examination at his own e post of Assistant Teacher. |he petitioner submits that the jcovered by the decision of this b^t"ween Preetam Singh Parihar and Cl^hattisgarh and another decided by m|iy be disposed of in terms of the inh'he aforesaid matter. been disputed by learned counsel |tant petition is disposed of with Ijs to make payment of two advance ^rom the date of his appointment today. However, this order shall (nade by the State regarding facts l^r as to costs. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge