IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 15405 of 2007 Between: Bandelu Nageswara Rao, S/o. Sri Satyanaraya, R/o.D.Kumudavalli,2nd Ward,Member of GP, Ganapavaram(M), W.G Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Dist Collector, W.G Dist, Eluru. 2 The Dist Panchayat Officer, W.G Dist Eluru 3 D.Kumuduvalli G.P, rep.by its Surpench,Parasu Satya Sreenivas, S/o.Sri Rama Krishna,D.Kumudavalli,Ganapavaram(M), W.G Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction of the 1st respondents in not considering the representations dt.24-05-2007 and 14-02-2007(and not taken action against Sarpanch and Bill Collector) is illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents No:1&2 to dispose of representations pending with them and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:S.SURENDRA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: The petitioner is a Member from 2nd Ward of D.Kumudavalli, Ganapavaram Mandal, West Godavari District. He submitted a representation, dated 24.05.2007, to the District Panchayat Oﬃcer, and another representation, dated 14.02.2007, to the District Collector, alleging that the Sarpanch and Panchayat Secretary of the Village are misusing the funds of the Gram Panchayat. It is also stated that the Gram Panchayat is so small and that there is no necessity for Panchayat Secretary. His grievance is that no action has been taken thereon. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj. The petitioner did not make reference to any speciﬁc acts of omissions, or commissions, on the part of the Sarpanch, or Panchayat Secretary. It is very diﬃcult to direct respondents 1 and 2 to take any action, on the basis of such vague and abstract allegations. If the petitioner is so advised, he can make speciﬁc representation, pointing out any act, or omission, referable to any provision of law. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to make representations with speciﬁc allegations, with reference to any acts, or omissions, on the part of the Sarpanch, or Panchayat Secretary. As and when such representations are made, respondents 1 and 2 shall take necessary action thereon. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ Dt.23.10.2008 L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J GJ