HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. t> Contempt Petition No.220/2008 Petitioners : 1. Shyamlal Pradhan S/o Late Gundnidhi, aged about 48 years, Workingas Time Keeper, R.E.S. Sub Division, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 2. Bharat Lal Behra S/o Shri Bhuneshwar Prasad Behra, aged about 45 years, Working as Time Keeper, R.E.S. Sub Division-Tamnar; Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 3. Chandrashekhar Sahu S/o Shri Dukhiram Sahu, laged about 55 years, Working as Time Keeper, R.E.S. Sub Division Pusoure, Raigarh(G.G.) 4. Surendra Prasad Singh S/o Shri Ramdev Singh, aged about 54 years, Working asTime Keeper, R.E.S. Sub Division, Raigarh, District Raigarh (G.GJ ^ 5. Shiv Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Shishupal Prasad Yadav, aged about 42 years, Working as Time Keeper, R.E.S. Sub Division, Janjgir Champa (C.G.) 6. Babulal Manikpuri S/o Dalli Das Manikpuri, aged about 50 years, Working asTime Keeper.R.E.S. Sub Division Baramkela, District Raigarh (C.G.) 7. Harihar Sewak Barik S/o Late Shri Aniruddha Prasad Barik, aged about 44 years, Working as Time Keeper, R.E.S. Sub Division Baramkela, District Raigarh (C.G.) 8. Narayan Prasad, S/o Sadhuram Jaiswal, aged about 48 years, Working as Time Keeper, R.E.S. Sub Division Malkharoda, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) 9. Krishna Chandra S/o Shri Kedamath Patel, aged about 52 years, Working as Time Keeper, R.E.S. Syb Division Dabhara, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) -^' & —'L' ^ Non-ap^ljcant 10. Santosh .Kumar Mishra, S/o Shri Vinay Mishra, aged about 48 years, Working as Time Keeper, R.E.S. Sub Division Dabhara, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) Versus R. P. Mandal, Secretary/Development Commissioner, Panchayat and Rural Devetopment Department, Mantralaya, D.K. S. Bhawan, Raipur Contempt Petition under Article 21 S of the Constitutlon of India read wtth SectiorLtZoftheCojitemptof CourtsAct, 1973. Present: Shri Indrasen Sahu, counsel for the petitioners. ; Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, counsel forthe respond^nt. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 15-06-2009) Heard. (2) Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the petitioners have atready been regularized and so far as the back wages are concerned, the respondent has already initiated steps and would ensure that payment of back wages will be made within three months from today. (3) In this view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioners prays that the petition be disposed of on the said terms. (4) Accordingly, the petifion stands disposed of. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge Tumane