HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY C.R.P. No.765 OF 2010 DATE:05-03-2010 BETWEEN: Vundavalli Bapi Raju …Petitioner AND Kuntella Gangaraju & Another …Respondents THIS COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY C.R.P. No.765 OF 2010 ORDER: This revision is by the plaintiff complaining inaction on the part of I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada in disposing of I.A.No.99 of 2009 filed for temporary injunction pending disposal of suit in O.S.No.152 of 2009 filed for the relief of permanent injunction. When the matter was taken up for admission on 26.2.2010, this Court called for a report from I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada to apprise the reasons for non-disposal of impugned I.A. The report, dated 4.3.2010 submitted by I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada discloses that after issuing urgent notice in the I.A. counters were filed by the respondents and the matter was adjourned from time to time as the counsel on both side reported not ready from 2.6.2009 to 30.7.2009. On 30.7.2009, the counsel for the petitioner was heard and Exs.P.1 and P.2 were marked on behalf of the petitioner and at the request of counsel for the respondents, the matter underwent five adjournments from 10.8.2009 even though imposition of costs on one occasion. Finally, on 16.11.2009 both the counsel were present and the counsel for the petitioner submitted that the counsel for respondents should be heard before passing the orders, which fact was not recorded on the docket. On the said submission, the matter was adjourned to 25.11.2009 on payment of costs of Rs.50/-. On 25.11.2009 as the Presiding Officer was on leave, the matter was adjourned to 8.1.2010 and as the said date happened to be Sankranthi Vacation, it was adjourned to 28.3.2010. from the events narrated above, no reason can be attributed to the learned I Additional Junior Civil Judge for non- disposal of the I.A. However, in the report, the learned I Additional Junior Civil Judge undertook that he would bestow his attention for early disposal of the impugned I.A. In that view of the matter, it is suffice to direct the learned I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada to see that the impugned I.A. is disposed of without any further delay and that if the respondents do not cooperate in that regard, he can pass appropriate orders on merits. The revision is disposed of accordingly. No costs. _______________ A. GOPAL REDDY, J. MARCH 05, 2010 Tsr.