WP(C) 1821/2011 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY The petitioner venture college challenges the order dated 27th December, 2010 (A nnexure-23) of the Government, whereby the prayer of the Patharkandi College of Karimganj District for concurrence of its Arts Stream was rejected on the ground that the College Authorities have engaged faculties who don’t fulfill the UGC n orms. 2. However, Ms. M Gogoi Medhi, learned standing counsel for the Education D epartment has produced a letter dated 30th March, 2011 of the Government address ed to the learned standing counsel to show that a reconsideration was thereafter made and it is recorded in the recent order dated 29th March, 2011 that, the no rms insisted earlier for the College’s faculty members shouldn’t be applied to P atharkandi College. Accordingly the Director of Higher Education has been direct ed to process the claim of the college for granting financial assistance by the Government. 3. On perusal of the order dated 29th March, 2011 of the Addl. Chief Secret ary, Mr. DK Sarmah, learned counsel submits that the petitioner may not have any subsisting grievances at this stage as the impugned order dated 27th December, 2010 has since been reviewed. 4. In view of the order dated 29th March, 2011, the respondents are now exp ected to take necessary steps to give effect to the order dated 29th March, 2011 . The process be completed without unnecessary loss of time. 5. A copy of the order dated 29th March, 2011 and communication dated 30t h March, 2011 be kept in the case record. 6. Case is disposed of accordingly.