IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44827 of 2009 DULAR SINGH @ KULO SINGH @ TALO SINGH, Son of Kuso Singh, resident of village Jakhour, P.S. Birupur, District Lakhisarai …. Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ….. Opposite Party ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Kumar No. 2, Advocate For the State : Mr. Uma Shankar Pd. Singh, A.P.P. ---- 4 19.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 324, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. Substance of allegation as set up in the first information report is that the petitioner along with three others co-accused have resorted to indiscriminate firing injuring the informant. However, it is submitted that one of the co-accused Bipin Singh had already been granted bail by a Bench of this Court by order dated 15.5.2005 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 20081 of 2005 as he had completed 6 months in custody. However, the petitioner is stated to be in custody since 18.5.2009 and as such he has completed about 10 months in custody. 2 Learned counsel for the State submitted that prayer for bail of another co-accused who was not named in the first information report has been refused bail by a Bench of this Court. However, it is a fact that similarly situate co-accused person had been granted bail as mentioned above. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, DULAR SINGH @ KULO SINGH @ TALO SINGH, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C. V, Lakhisarai, in connection with S.Tr. No. 580 of 2009 arising out of Barahia (Birupur) P.S. Case No. 111 of 2003, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be a close relative or family member of the petitioner, who shall file affidavit before the concerned court giving complete genealogy to show his or her relationship with the petitioner. Further the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of trial. If 3 the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation then the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)