1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPR) NO. 94 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. OF 2011. SANJAY NARAYANDAS DHOBLE ..VERSUS.. M/S MADHUSUDAN GHADE, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM THRU. ITS PARTNER ARUN GHADE & OTHS Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. M. R. Johrapurkar, Advocate for the applicant Mr. S. V. Sohoni, Advocate for the respondent nos. 2 and 4. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. DATED : 20 th AUGUST , 2011 . Heard Mr. M. R. Joharapurkar, the learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. S. V. Sohoni, the learned counsel for respondent nos.2 and 4. None appears for respondent no.3, though served. This is an application filed by the applicant for condonation of delay in filing the revision application. Mr. Joharapurkar, the learned counsel for the applicant, by inviting my attention to the grounds at paragraphs 6 to 8 of the application, submitted that the delay caused in filing the revision application is purely unintentional and the applicant was bona fidely carrying out the proceedings before the wrong forum. In view of the submissions of the learned counsel for the applicant and treating the reasons stated in the application to be just and proper, the delay requires to be condoned. 2 The criminal application is allowed. The delay in filing the revision application is condoned. The criminal application is disposed of. JUDGE Diwale