IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.457 of 2007 NAYAN PRASAD @ JHAGRU PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 3. 31.7.2008. Heard the learned counsel for both the parties. This revision application has been filed against the order dated 21st February,2007 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Siwan in Misc. Case No.83 of 2002 thereby the petitioner has been directed under section 125 Cr.P.C. to pay maintenance of Rs.1,000/- per month to the opposite party and Rs.500/- per month to her daughter from the date of the order. The only submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is a poor vendor. He is not in a position to pay heavy amount to the opposite party. It is further submitted that the petitioner is still ready to keep his wife and daughter and maintain her. On the other hand, the opposite party submitted that the opposite party is not ready to live with the petitioner as he has kept a concubine. Upon consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the grounds mentioned in the impugned order, I am not inclined to interfere in the order of the court below with regard to grant of maintenance to the opposite party no.2. However, in the facts and circumstances, the petitioner is directed to pay Rs.1,000/- per month to the opposite party and only Rs.250/- to her daughter from the date of order as directed by the court - 2 - N.H./ below. Accordingly, this revision application is dismissed with above modification in the rate of maintenance. ( Ghanshyam Prasad )