IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7946 of 2010 1. BIJENDRA, S/O LATE SHIV SHARAN MANDAL, R/O VILLAGE - RAM NAGAR, P.S.- RUNNI SAIDPUR, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI (BIHAR). Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, RURAL ENGINEERING ORGANIZATION, MUZAFFARPUR. 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, RURAL ENGINEERING ORGANIZATION (RURAL WORK DEPARTMENT) WORK CIRCLE, MUZAFFARPUR. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, RURAL ENGINEERING ORGANIZATION (RURAL WORK DEPARTMENT) WORK DIVISION, SHEOHAR AT SITAMARHI. 5. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, RURAL ENGINEERING ORGANIZATION (RURAL WORK DEPARTMENT) SITAMARHI-II. ----------- 2 28.02.2011 Petitioner has filed this writ application for regularization of his services. As per his case, he worked as Khalasi between the period 1987 to 1993. Admittedly, thereafter he is not in service. He relies on some circulars and executive instructions of the Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department (General Administrative Department) as contained in Annexure-3. After the law having been laid down by the Constitution Bench of the Apex Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka Vs. Uma Devi (3) reported in 2006 (2) PLJR 2 (SC) 363 any case of regularization can be considered only in the light of the observations made by the Constitution Bench in Paragraph 44 thereof and any resolution/circular of the Government can be read only in consonance with the observations of the Constitution Bench. It appears that in the light of the earlier orders of this Court in the case of the petitioners, as contained in Annexure-5, a detailed consideration has already been made by the respondents, vide Annexure-6, and following the parameters laid down by the Constitution Bench, their cases have been rejected. This Court does not find any error in the decision of the authorities rejecting the case of the petitioner, vide Annexure-6. The writ application is dismissed. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)