-N^ ^s^ <3 IN THE HDNOURABLE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT OF JUDlCATORE AT BILASPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.-^^'1^'? /2002f PETXTIONER 8 yi.shrann Singh Yadav S/o Shrl Ram / Slngh Yadav aged 41 years (Asst. ,/ Teaeher) Govt. prlmery School { Sahgaon, Tahsil-Dondilohara.Dlsbt. Durg,(chhattisgarh) VE»SUS RESPONDENTS ^si?; ..^<$f^ ^0.-";,c^<V^':C;^'-' ?.'^-^w'%;<L-i"' \^^.... •>" 1. State of chhsttisgarh, Through; it's principal Seeretary D^>art- ment o£ School sducation, Mantralaya. RaApur( Chhatti.sgarh) 2. Additional Secretary.Dqiartment o£ school Bducation Mantralaya* Raipur (ehhattlsgarh). 3. Distriet Eflucatlon Officer, District; Durg (dihattisgarh). 4. Sankul-ln-charge, sahgaon Village Sahgaon Tahsil Dondi- lohara Distt.Durg (c.G.) •^ * WRIT P_ETITXON_UND_ER ARTICLE 226. THE CONSTITUTJON QF INDIA -c-aaDast_fully begs to subnit XI-HC-22 3II^I^i[ Ki-li* 3Il|Sl sti*rw +ifia ~ ? 'g^ ••<<i<<i<;i<i, aiflltf'is, Ritni«*i< ..^.;.&..K.O:...^..tt.r_ *<lt«11g,»j|<^-—-----------^gg ^ siit?i'^snwofei coianianding fhe respondents which has been replaced by tl' <tii<il(i<ili iwS 4 fe^t tRltt{l< ^siPmai^a 01.04.2003 Shri Raj Kamal Singh, c^unsel for-fhe petitioner State by Shri Ranbir Sin^h, Govt. Advocate. Heard: 5y this writ .p'etlllon fl|led imder Article 226~of the Constitution of India, petitf.oner prav's for a direction Ito reinstate the Sankul Svstem Petitioner subiuits that consideration introduccd the ianki.il systeiii of 1997 and gave powers to the Principals whcj that they caii miderstand an{ teaehers. T'he teachers ai'e w4U fheir biUs etc., ai'e redres.; manner. Now fhe State of C svstem ofthe vear 1987. the State of M.P. after due are the Saiiki-u-in Charge so 1 handle the difficulties of th; in touch with the Principles and the grievance of the teacljiing staff regai'ding clearing of ;d proniptly ui an ainicabk "ihattisgarh has abolished the Saiiki.il System and introduc^d the old svstem of svstem of r'!aAifai_____^ XI-HC-22 SII^^iI PW'h aiEST ?ti*ilct» y^tl 'g^ "ilWlctf, 9Ti)fl<ls, i«i<yiwy an^r TR'q? KINCTI a>w* '^ 200 fN^T' Sf^S^tIWl TEifta 1987 and the powers VG! ti'ansferred to Block Educatio loaded. It is subiaitted thd teachers to rush to the offic redressal of thelr .grievance^ 'the interest of the teachers ai subiaitted that Sankul Vvat svsteni of 1987 that has beei order. The petltloner has not si raised any demand of justi rushed t.o this coiirt for redre ''BWis'i^l-i iiwdi'^'ft^ <F»I<<K ^rsiiiOTau^i :ed in Principles have been 3. Officers who are alreadv work t it woukl be dif&cult fbr the ;.of Block Education Office fbr , which not only amounts to wastage of theii'time aad mo|ney, but would adverselv affect d students as well. It is fuTtlier iastha is still better thaa the abolished.bv an unreasonable Ibmltted any representation nor ^e before the authorities and isal of its grievance. Having considered the fticts and circLrmstances of the case and iiiaterial on record, e^ids ofjustice would be served if A\BilSW(j?'fe^A<$^. the peutlonei^makeig a detalle^ representation alougvvith copy ['fl^ifid^ \ /• XI-HC-22 SIt^IW ft{-li!* SV^ sn*iw^ret ^l 'S^ •^nmi, wS«' ,hwvy. HWinr tniich sff^r i^r^ ^......te£^ "^ 200 ^t^S!' of this writ petition before redressal of its grievance. Let the petitioner niali alongivith a copy of this ordcri withiii ttvo weeks from the dai [hcforc respondent no. 1 and 2 |te oi" receipt of a copy of iliis order and on sucti a representsjtion being filed, the same shall be considered and decided a within 3 weeks froni the date |>f representation. In case aiiy adverse order is passed and th^ petitioner feels aggrieved, he mav chailenge the same. This petitlon is disposed aforesaid. Consequendy, M.W. stand disposed of. C.C. as per rules. ^'i'lW^l ?i '^f ^ f^*^ ?t^$R ^? 3l)S(PT SII^r |:he competent authority for :e a detai >n early as possible preferably ():fwith the observation/llberty 3.1848/03 aiid I.A.No.8524/03 ^ Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge i\yc7