AB 3388/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.R. SARMA Heard Mr. A.K. Das, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioners. Also heard M r. B.B. Gogoi, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, appearing for the State-responde nt. Perused the Case Diary. By this application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the petitioners, namely (1) Salam Ali, (2)Giyas Ali and (3)Kalu Miya, have prayed for pre-arrest bail, in co nnection with Chaygaon P.S. Case No.228/2011, under Sections 448/387 IPC. The allegation made against the petitioners is that, on the night of 04.09.2011, the petitioners entered into the informant’s brother’s house and demanded money . It has also been alleged that the said accused-petitioners caused injury to th e brother of the informant. Having heard the learned counsel for both the parties and considering the incrim inating materials collected by the Investigating Officer, I do not find it to be a fit case to extend the benefit of pre-arrest bail in favour of the petitioner s at this stage. Hence the prayer for pre-arrest bail is rejected. The A.B. Application is disposed of.