IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11488 of 2010 1. Khusboo Devi W/O Late Murari Shah R/O Court Area Bodh, P.S.- Barh, Distt.- Patna Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The District Magistrate, Patna 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Barh 4. The Block Development Officer, Barh 5. The Circle Officer, Barh ---------------------------------- 2. 18.11.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. If the husband of the petitioner was a daily wager himself, not in regular employment of the respondents, sympathy cannot empower the Court to give direction to consider her for compassionate appointment . The claim for compensation by reason of the death caused by electrocution is an entirely different matter. The petitioner does not appear to have raised it before the authorities but has done so in the writ application for the first time. Liberty is granted to represent for the same before the competent authority, stated at the Bar, to be the Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board. If such a claim is raised let the same be considered in accordance with law and a reasoned and speaking order passed within a maximum period of two months from the date of presentation of such a representation. Needless to state that considering the difficult status of the petitioner, if the respondents find any justification in the claim or in any part of the claim necessary consequential order shall be issued simultaneously. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)