IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 9TH JUNE 2008 / 19TH JYAISHTA 1930 W.P(C).No. 16127 of 2008(T) --------------------------------- PETITIONERS: 1. BALAJI.K.P., AGED 47 YEARS, S/O.K.K.PURUSHOTHAMAN, KUMARAKOM, KOTTAYAM. 2. MANJU ANANDAKUTTAN, 38 YEARS, W/O.ANANDAKUTTAN K.P., KAYIYIL PARAMBU (H), KUMARAKOM, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.A.K.ABDUL AZEEZ SMT.M.R.JAYALATHA RESPONDENTS: 1. SECRETARY, RTA, ALAPPUZHA. 2. SECRETARY, RTA, KOTTAYAM. 3. SASIDHARAN.M., MATTATHIL HOUSE, AMBIKA MARKET, VAIKOM, VECHUR. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SMT. K.R. DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 16127 OF 2008 T ==================== Dated this the 9th day of June, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioners submit that in the timing conference that is now scheduled on 17/6/08 for revising the timings of the 3rd respondent, they had filed Exts. P4 and P4(a) objections dated 20/5/2008 requesting for fixation of clash free timings. In this writ petition all that is sought for is that the 1st respondent should consider the objections also at the time of settlement of timings of the 3rd respondent. Since the petitioners claim that they will be affected by the fixation of timings in the timing conference now scheduled to 17/6/08, it is only reasonable that the objections produced as Exts. P4 and P4(a) are also taken into account by the 1st respondent, if these objections have already been received and are pending with him. 2. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing that the 1st respondent shall take note of Exts. P4 and P4(a) while revising the timings of the 3rd respondent, provided the objections referred to above have been received by the 1st respondent. Petitioner may produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp