// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN D.B. Civil Writ Petition (Parole) No.13660/2008 {Makhan Lal @ Makhaniya Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others} Date of Order ::: 12.01.2009 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Hon'ble Mr. Justice Guman Singh Shri Lakhan Singh Tomar, Counsel for petitioner Shri B.K. Sharma, P.P., for the State #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition for grant of first parole of 20 days. A notice to show-cause was issued to the respondents and, in response thereto, they have filed reply to the writ petition, wherein it has been contended that the application of the petitioner is still pending, therefore, the present writ petition is premature. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that on earlier occasion also the application of the petitioner was kept pending and was not decided, therefore, this Court should consider the case of the petitioner directly for grant of parole. During the course of arguments, the // 2 // learned counsel for the State has assured the court that the application of the petitioner will definitely be considered within a period of one month, therefore, a direction to that effect may be given. After considering the submissions of the learned counsel for both the parties, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the application of the petitioner on merits positively within a period of one month from today and will apprise the result of the application to this court as well as the petitioner also. A copy of this order may be sent for compliance to the District Magistrate, Jaipur. It is made clear that it will be open for the petitioner to approach this Court again in case he feels aggrieved with the order passed by the Parole Committee. (Guman Singh) J. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//