IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6359 of 2010 RAJIV KUMAR SAFI, SON OF SRI HARSHIT SAFI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NAWHATH, P.S. PANDAUL, DISTRICT MADHUBANI. ---- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DIRECTOR, WELFARE (MAHADALIT DEVELOPMENT SCHEME), GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MADHUBANI 5. THE DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER, MAHADALIT VIKAS, MADHUBANI 6. THE DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER, MADHUBANI 7. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SADAR SUB-DIVISION, MADHUBANI 8. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, PANDAUL, MADHUBANI 9. THE BLOCK WELFARE OFFICER, PANDAUL BLOCK, MADHUBANI 10.THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT SRIPUR HATI, PANDAUL, MADHUBANI 11.PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, SRIPUR HATI PANCHAYAT, PANDAUL, MADHUBANI ----------- 2 17.5.2010 Petitioner is claiming that he has secured the highest marks for the purposes of being selected as Vikash Mitra. After publication of the first list, suddently the petitioner found that his name was not on top of the list rather some other candidate by name of Umesh Kumar Suman had been selected, although the petitioner had got 60% whereas Umesh Kumar Suman had got 57% marks. In pursuance of Clause 11 of the scheme, the petitioner filed representation and objections which are contained in annexure-5 series to the District Magistrate, Madhubani, The District Welfare Officer, Madhubani and the Sub-divisional Officer, Sadar, Madhubani on 17.3.2010 which is still pending before them. The District Magistrate should call for the records and after noticing Umesh Kumar Suman and the District Development Officer, examine the records of the selection process and pass an order within a period of six weeks on receipt of a copy of this order, considering that the appointment is only for 11 months. This application is disposed of with the aforesaid directions. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)