^^ 4.^ ^f^ ,w IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0. OF 2011 PETITIONERS : ^y. ^ A\/^ ^i / A>" ^ ^••h/c^' t cy l' ..' 1. Prahalad Chouhan, S/o Late Shri Jani Ram Chouhan, aged about 37 years, Sarpanch, Village Panchayat Amora, R/o Ward No.ll Village Amora, Janpad Panchayat Nawagarh, Tahsil Nawagarh, District Janjgir-Champa (CG). ^' 2. Ram Nath Kashyap, S/o Late Shri Sudama Lal Kashyap, aged about 50 years, Panchayat Secretary, Janpad Panchayat, Nawagarh, Tahsil Nawagarh, District Janjgir- Champa (CG). 3." Ram Kumar Maravi, S/o Late Shri Jhunowan Ram Maravi, aged about 38 years, Rojgar Sahayak, village Panchayat Amora, Janpad Panchayat, Nawagarh, Tahsil Nawagarh, District Janjgir-Champa (CG). 4. •" Shukhnandan Patel, S/o Late Ghanshyam Prasad Patel, aged about 28 years, Occupation Grarain Dak Sevak at Post Office village Panchayat Amora, Janpad Panchayat, Nawagarh, Tahsil Nawagarh, District Janjgir-Champa (CG). RESPONDENTS: Versus ^" State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Panchayat & Social Welfare, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). z 2. Lokpal, Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Agency, District Janjgir-Charapa (CG). 3.' The Collector, Distt. Janjgir- Champa (CG). .J- 4." The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Janjgir- Champa (CG). 5. The Program Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Nawagarh, Janjgir-Champa (CG). WRnLPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ,ti HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (0 N0.6108 OF 2011 PETITIONERS Prahalad Chouhan & Others Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Jitendra Nande, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Shashank Thaku, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (Passed on this 18th day of October, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition on the ground that the petitioners may be permitted to question the validity of the powers conferred on the Lokpal under the provisions of the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act and the Scheme made thereunder. 2. No objection from other side. 3. It is ordered, as prayed for. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, ifso advised. ,—-• Gowri Sd/- SATISH K. ANGNmORI Judge