Cr.M.P (M) No. 469 of 2010 04.06.2010 Present: Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for the respondent. The petitioner has approached this Court for grant of bail. He has charged for offences under Sections 366, 376 (2) G, 342, 392, 394, 457 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The Learned Sessions Judge on prima facie consideration of material on record rejected bail application of the petitioner, which was instituted on 10.5.2010. The petitioner is now before this court. The petitioner has not pleaded any changed circumstances in this application. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the medical evidence on record does not support the case of the prosecutrix. He refers in particular to the fact that prosecutrix does not bear any marks of injury on her body and that her husband also does not have any injury on him. He submits that this is contrary to the allegations made against the petitioner and other accused that they have gagged the prosecutrix and her husband was subjected to beatings. I am not inclined to go in this aspect of the case at this stage. This is to be considered by the learned Trial Court, whether these facts constitute innocence of the petitioner. It is also well settled by number of precedents of the Supreme Court that it is not necessary that there should be marks of violence on the body of the prosecutrix, if she is raped. This petition is dismissed accordingly. June 04, 2010 (Dev Darshan Sud), (KRS) Judge