1 WP.1001-2011 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1001 OF 2011 Ankur Kanchan Dey ..Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.. ...Respondents. ----- Ms. Seema Sarnaik, for the Petitioner. Mr. Y.S. Shinde, APP for the State. Mr. Hitesh Vyas, for Respondent No.3. ---- CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U.D. SALVI, JJ. JUNE 20, 2011. P.C.: 1. We have heard Mrs. Sarnaik, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner, and we are satisfied that the custody of the minor child with respondent no.3, the mother of the minor child, cannot be a reason for entertaining the Petition for habeas corpus. The remedy for the Petitioner against respondent no.3-mother of the child may be somewhere else and we are informed that the order passed by the Family Court on 22.10.2008 is already a subject matter of the challenge in Writ Petition No.1894 of 2011. 2 WP.1001-2011 2. Hence, the Petition is rejected with liberty to the Petitioner, as is available in law. (U.D. SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)