: 1 : wp.8140.2011 vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8140 OF 2011 Sangita Nanaso Wadekar & Ors. .. Petitioners V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Chetan Modi I/b Mihir Desai for the Petitioners Mr.C.R. Sonawane, AGP, for the Respondents CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DATED: NOVEMBER 8, 2011 P.C.: 1. The petitioner has been transferred from the existing school after more than 25 years of service. It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the school where she has been transferred, is located 70 kms away from the present school. The petitioner has not made any representation to the Divisional Commissioner, Pune as is required under the Government Resolution dated 6.5.2010. Even otherwise, the mid term of the academic year is almost closing. We, therefore, do not find any reason to entertain this petition. However, if the petitioner submits a representation to the Divisional Commissioner, Pune against her transfer from Kharabwadi, : 2 : wp.8140.2011 Taluka Khed to Pansarewasti, Taluka Wadgao Mawal within two weeks from today, the same may be heard and decided as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six weeks from its receipt. 2. Writ petition is disposed of in terms of the above directions. (SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.)