IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 3RD NOVEMBER 2009 / 12TH KARTHIKA 1931 RP.No. 1057 of 2009() ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.28327/2009 DATED 08/10/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER -------------------------------------------------- *SURESH KUMAR,S/O.CHOYI, VALAPPIL HOUSE, IRINGAVOOR P.O., TIRUR,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. * THE HOUSE NAME OF THE PETITIONER IS CORRECTED AS “VAILIPATT HOUSE” INSTEAD OF “VALAPPIL HOUSE”, VIDE ORDER DATED 03/11/2009 IN I.A.604/2009. BY ADV. MR.JAMSHEED HAFIZ RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS ---------------------------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM. **2. THE TAHSILDAR, TIRURANGADI TALUK, MALAPPURAM. ** THE 2ND RESPONDENT IS SUBSTITUTED AS “SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUR” INSTEAD OF “THE TAHSILDAR, TIRURANGADI TALUK”, VIDE ORDER DATED 03/11/2009 IN I.A. NO.604/2009. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.I.V. PRAMOD. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/11/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: rs. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------ R.P.No.1057 OF 2009 IN W.P.(C) No.28327 OF 2009 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of November, 2009 O R D E R ~~~~~~~ By the judgment sought to be reviewed, directions were issued to the District Collector to consider the question of temporary release of vehicle. This Review Petition is filed stating that the Sub Inspector of Police should be brought on record. The directions were to the District Collector. I do not find any error apparent on the face of the record of the judgment. The next ground of review is that the petitioner's home address is not correctly shown in the cause title and that there is a mistake in that regard. That again is not a ground for review of the judgment. It is the Collector, who has to act in terms of the judgment. The Sub Inspector of Police is not a necessary party. The issuance of the judgment without him on the array does not call for review. Without prejudice to the petitioner's right to move for correction of his address in the cause title, the Review Petition is dismissed. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge ps