IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3093 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3093 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3093 OF 2007 1. Shri Bhagappa Tukaram Sutar. 2. Shri Somling Tukaram Sutar. ... Applicants. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. Vijay Killedar for the applicants. Ms.S.D.Shinde, APP for the State. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 24th September 2007. DATED: 24th September 2007. DATED: 24th September 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- . Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking bail in connection with CR.No.55/2007 registered with Karad Police Station, district- Satara for the offences punishable under section 302 read with section 34 of Indian Penal Code. 3. The eye witness has implicated the present applicants. Sufficient material is available on record to connect the present applicants with the offence alleged. Considering the role of the present applicant in commission of offence and the material available on record, in my opinion, it is not a fit case for grant of bail. 4. Apart from above, there are cross-complaints filed against each other. In that view of the matter, once the applicants are released on bail, possibility of pressurising the prosecution witnesses cannot be ruled out. In the circumstances, application is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE