IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 254 of 2006 (S/B) Avinash Singh and others ............ Petitioners Versus Uttaranchal Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd and others ........... Respondents ........... JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Sri Jagdish Singh Bisht, the learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty of filing another properly drafted writ petition for the redressal of the petitioners’ grievances projected in the writ petition and also challenging the selection and appointment of respondents 5 to 35 on the basis of campus selection. 2. Permission granted. 3. With the above liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. With the above order, CLMA No. 10386 of 2006 also stands dismissed as withdrawn. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 08.06.2007 08.06.2007 A