1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2065 OF 2008 (Ku. Vaishali d/o Dadaji Gaikwad vs. State and others) ___________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : JUNE 6, 2008 Heard Shri Choudhari, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Shri Sambre, learned Counsel for the respondent no.2, and Shri Mishra, learned Counsel for the respondent no.3. Shri Choudhari, learned Counsel for the petitioner, states that caste claim of the petitioner is pending before the Caste Scrutiny Committee for verification. Shri Sambre, learned Counsel for the respondent no.2, submits that caste claim of the petitioner, if not decided earlier, will be decided on its own merits according to law and procedure applicable in this regard within a period of three months from the date of communication of this order. The learned Counsel for the petitioner 2 states that the petitioner undertakes to appear before the Caste Scrutiny Committee on 23.6.2008. Hence, no fresh notice shall be issued to the petitioner by the Caste Scrutiny Committee for this purpose. In the backdrop of the above referred facts, nothing survives in the petition. The petition is disposed of accordingly. The issue about challenge to the notice issued by the respondent no.3 for taking action against the petitioner for non-submission of caste validity certificate is kept open. JUDGE JUDGE khj