IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1571 of 2001 VEERA LAL SAHANI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3/ 1/9/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner was an applicant for the post of constable under Advertisement No.1/95 and he was not selected. Then came a fresh advertisement No.1/98. The petitioner applied in response to the same without questioning his non-appointment under Advertisement No.1/95. The writ application is silent what has happened to his candidature in Advertisement No.1/98. Presumably, he was not selected when he suddenly remembered that he had a cause of action in Advertisement No.1/95. This Court finds no merits in this writ application. The Court considers the aforesaid action of the petitioner sufficient to deny him relief. There is no need for this Court to discus the merits of the matter as made out in the counter affidavit denying any illegality or discrimination to the petitioner under Advertisement No.1/95. The writ application is dismissed. KC ( Navin Sinha,J )