1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.48 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2052 OF 2008 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri.S.T. Shelke Advocate for Appellant.. .... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 9TH SEPTEMBER, 2010. 1. Heard. Learned counsel Shri. Shelke submits that the application filed by the Respondent for seeking permission under Section 51 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950, for filing Suit under Section 50 of the Act is not maintainable. The Respondent does not have a legal right to claim relief as asked for, as reflected in the application. The counsel further submits that the learned Single Judge committed error in rejecting the 2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Petition. 2. We have perused the provisions of Section 50 and 51 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 and the Order passed by the learned Single Judge. We do not notice any glaring error or perversity in the Order passed by the learned Single Judge to exercise our jurisdiction under Letters Patent Appeal. The Letters Patent Appeal stands dismissed. [K.K. TATED, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.] asb/SEPT10/lpa48.09