1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.70 OF 2008 Mr.M.Ramchandra Reddy, Hubli ..... Appellant vs. M/s Panyam Cements & Mineral ..... Respondents Industries Ltd., represented by The M.D.,Karnool & G.M.,Hagari. Appellant present in person. Mr.Dinkar Rao, Advocate for respondents. CORAM : C.L. Pangarkar, J. DATED : 20th January, 2010. PC : 1. This Second Appeal is preferred by the original plaintiff who was unsuccessful in both the Courts below. The plaintiff was engaged by the respondent-defendant, as Raw Chemical Assistant in the Chemical Division of the defendant no.2 situate at Hagari in the year 1975. He was permanent employee and served for more than 23 years. He was even promoted in the year 1991. Later, however the services of the appellant were terminated. 2. The plaintiff therefore sought declaration that his termination was illegal and he should be reinstated in service. The defendant resisted the suit by contending that the defendant 2 did not require the services of the appellant as there was sufficient sale in that area. It was contended that the plaintiff was not entitled to any reinstatement. The learned trial Court recorded the evidence and found that the termination of the plaintiff was not illegal and plaintiff was not entitled to reinstatement. The appellate court on appeal also found against the appellant-plaintiff. Hence, this appeal. 3. I have heard the appellant in person. None appears for the respondent. The appellant contends before me that his services have been illegally terminated and he should be reinstated. The Courts below have concurrently held that the termination of the services of the appellant was not illegal. It was found by both the courts below that the appellant accepted the compensation and he has no right to agitate that his termination was illegal. Further more, it must be observed here that the contract of personal service is not specifically enforceable. Only remedy available is to claim the damages. The compensation paid by the defendant has been accepted by the plaintiff. In the circumstances, I do not find any substance in the appeal. The same is dismissed in limine. (C.L. Pangarkar. J.)