1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5111 OF 2003 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5111 OF 2003 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5111 OF 2003 WITH WITH WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5115 OF 2003 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5115 OF 2003 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5115 OF 2003 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.47229 OF 2003 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.47229 OF 2003 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.47229 OF 2003 Union of India : Appellants. versus The New India Assurance Co.Ltd. and ors. : Respondents. Mr.A.N.Samant for the appellants. Mr.Sarang Aradhye i/by Mr.R.V.Govilkar for Respondent No.2. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. DATED : 18th October 2005. DATED : 18th October 2005. DATED : 18th October 2005. ORAL ORDER ORAL ORDER ORAL ORDER 1. So far as Civil Application No.5111 of 2003 is concerned, it is for condonation of delay of 25 days. Mr.Samant for the appellants states 2 2 2 that Respondent No.3 is a formal party and no relief is claimed and he wants to delete Respondent No.3 from this application. Permission granted. So far as Respondent No.2 is concerned, Mr.Govilkar is representing respondent No.2. Respondent No.1 is served. Nobody is present for them. Advocate for the Respondent No.2 has no objection for condoning the delay. Hence the Civil Application No.5111 of 2003 is allowed. Delay is condoned. Civil Application No.5111 of 2003 is disposed of. Put up the appeal for admission after vacation. Stay to continue. [D.G.DESHPANDE] [D.G.DESHPANDE] [D.G.DESHPANDE]