THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.11128 of 2003 Dated:03.03.2006 Between: Sri Palakuri Satyanarayana, S/o.Late Ramana Rao. ..... PETITIONER AND The Deputy Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Dwarakanagar, Visakhapatnam, and another. .....RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.11128 of 2003 ORDER: M/s.Palukuri Mallepuvvu & Sons, a partnership Firm, was wholesale Kerosene dealer of Indian Oil Corporation. The Firm was started by one Bhairava Murthy, the uncle of the petitioner herein. After his death, the petitioner approached the respondents seeking permission for reconstitution of the Firm. By impugned letter, dated 20.04.2003, the petitioner was asked to furnish the No Objection-cum- Indemnity letter from the legal heirs of Late Sri Palukuri Bhairava Murthy, and get the signatures of the legal heirs of Bhairava Murthy in the presence of the Field Officer of Visakha Divisional Office of the Indian Oil Corporation. Aggrieved by the same, the present writ petition is filed. When the writ petition is pending, the petitioner has come forward with another miscellaneous petition, being W.P.M.P.No.34812 of 2005, seeking a direction to the respondents to pass orders in favour of the petitioner for reconstitution of M/s.Palukuri Mallepuvvu & Sons. The matter is heard finally. The petitioner’s Counsel submits that the petitioner has already complied with the two objections raised in the impugned letter, and therefore, the respondents may consider the request for reconstitution of the Firm. The Writ Petition is therefore, disposed of, directing the respondents to consider the request of the petitioner for reconstitution of M/s.Palukuri Mallepuvvu & Sons, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If any further requirements are to be fulfilled, liberty is given to the petitioner to fulfill the same. No costs. ____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 03.03.2006 vs