IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 2ND NOVEMBER 2007 / 11TH KARTHIKA 1929 WP(C).No. 32613 of 2007(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ T. HUSSAIN, RETIRED SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THARAYIL HOUSE, KOOTTILANGADI P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SUNIL KUMAR A.G SRI.SUDEESH KUMAR RAMAKRISHNA RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT HOME (A) DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MALAPPURAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BIJOY CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No. 32613 of 2007 -------------------------- Dated this the 2nd November, 2007 J U D G M E N T The petitioner retired as a Sub Inspector of Police on 30.11.2004. According to the petitioner, he had exercised his option to come over to the revised scale of pay as permitted by the Government in G.O.509/91/Fin. Dated 24.9.1991. He contends that in Exhibit-P2 judgment a Division Bench of this Court had directed the Government to consider the option submitted by similarly situated persons. Petitioner has submitted Exhibit-P6 representation claiming similar benefit. After having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to look into Exhibit-P6 and take a decision thereon, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. I have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the claim made in this writ petition. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of writ petition to the 2nd respondent, for compliance. (V.GIRI, JUDGE) ma K.THANKAPPAN,J CRL.A. NO.92 OF 1999 ORDER 25th May, 2007