BH CCXJRT OF JBBICfflURB 'ff~jSS£pga" S'OR MADHYA PRAQSSH WRST PETITIOH HO. INf flrf^l^nnl^h*l ,_yi995 PSTITIQHER s tSit S/9 Sfari Raaideo Tiwari, age P.5. GeurlG t.E^s.y ^ Mik^isfeEy o£ Homa Mfatss Depactmesati \f. :\.i, -•^••-'^., -'"•*-'---:.,v^. ••-'•^, •-<;ql$:-A -.r^^l .Dlvlsloaai SSi CoBimissl.oBei;, Railway peeteQtien porce (RPF) South-Sastera Railwa?» BilaspuZtS.P. 3.&ssistaat Ctxna'd.ssiQaer, Railway Pretectlsa pores (RPF) Bilaspuc,M.P PETITION UHDBE •.6KTICLS; 22S OF XMS CONSTITUTIOH OF INDI& i '^- r HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ..i Writ Petition No. 1239 of 1995 Petitioner Nageshwar Tiwari Versus Respondents Union of India & others, Sin^e Bench : Honlle Mr. Justice Satish K. Agn;ihotri, None for fhe petitioner. None for the respondents. ;iSS<-B. "<•;»»»- ORAL ORDER (3rd March, 2006) The foUowm.g order of fhe Court was passed by Satish K. Agnihotri, J. S.P.C. was directed to be issued on 17. l.2006 to fhe petitioner as weU as fhe respondents. The niatter was caUed for hearing twice. Ou bofh the occasions, none appeared nor any lepresentation was inade on behatfofttie petitioner. In yiew of the above, tlie petition stauds disiiiissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- Satisfc K. Agnjhoirs Judge 9. 3. ''!~;akur t-