IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 25TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 4041 of 2011 ---------------------------------- [CC.NO.122/2011 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-I, MANJERI] .................... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED: ------------------------------------ 1. FIROS, S/O.LATE MUHAMMED ABDUL RAZAK, VADAKKAYIL HOUSE, AMBALAKKADAVU, KALIKAVU P.O NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. PATHUMMUNNI, W/O.LATE MUHAMMED ABDUL RAZAK, VADAKKAYIL HOUSE, AMBALAKKADAVU, KALIKAVU P.O, NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. SUBAIDA, D/O.LATE MUHAMMED ABDUL RAZAK, VADAKKAYIL HOUSE, AMBALAKKADAVU, KALIKAVU P.O, NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. SAHLA, D/O.ALAVI KURIKKAL, VADAKKAYIL HOUSE, AMBALAKKADAVU, KALIKAVU P.O, NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 5. FOUSIA, W/O.FAIZAL, VADAKKAYIL HOUSE, AMBALAKKADAVU, KALIKAVU P.O, NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.R.SUDHEESHKUMAR, SRI.SUNIL KUMAR A.G. RESPONDENTS/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT: -------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031. 2. SABIDHA, D/O.LATE MUHAMMED, KADAVATH HOUSE, VAZHIKKADAVU P.O., NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 679 333. R1 B PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. RAJESH VIJAYAN, R2 BY ADV. SRI. VINOD KUMAR.C. THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: CRL.M.C. NO. 4041/2011: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES:- ANNEXURE A1: COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT SUBMITTED BEFORE THE HON'BLE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, MANJERI. ANNEXURE A2: COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT OF THE DEFACTO COMPLAINANT DTD. 10/11/2011. RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Prv. N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J. -------------------------------- Crl.M.C. No.4041 of 2011 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of November 2011 O R D E R Petitioners are the accused in C.C.No.122/2011 pending on the file of J.F.C.M.-I, Manjeri. The offence alleged against them is under Sec.498A r/w 34 IPC. 2nd respondent is the de facto complainant therein. She is represented in this Court by her counsel. It is submitted by both sides that the 2nd respondent and the first accused are now living together happily and so the 2nd respondent does not want to proceed further in the matter. Affidavit has been filed by the 2nd respondent stating that the matter has been settled. In the light of the settlement arrived at, this Crl.M.C. is allowed. Further proceeding in C.C.No.122/2011 pending on the file of J.F.C.M.-I, Manjeri is quashed. N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Jvt