^ ll IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CG) ,N0. 3l?^2011 WRIT PETITION (S) N0. /2011 WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. f \]C'— PETITIONER ^;^ '.^^ \^^\^. RESPONDENTS >mt. Benigna Toppo, W/o. Arj'un Ekka, aged about 54 years, ^_ ^...* occupation - Upper Division '"" ......Teacher, Government Middle School - Bazarpara, Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG) VERSUS 1. r, 2. 3. 4. 5. State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director, Lok Shikshan Sanchalnalaya, Directorate, Raipur (CG) Joint Director (Treasury, A/c & Pension), Nutan Chowk, Bilaspur. Distt. Education Officer, Distt. Raigarh (CG) Block Education Officer, Block - Dharamjaigarh, Distt.Raigarh (CG) :^___-.--..-_-._._.._.——.—_— \ 3i??^?r^t1^w WF ^WT sn*ii<sft Tumane ^ ^5r T<ii<<i<yt^,"®^m^^fsr^ray g^;wlte?.^.:.ll?..3^U...., *ii»<CTl <l»*fl<(» ---""••••••""•/•-<-"-^200 ^i1^?T ^RT ("^f3^T) wnw^f^ran^r SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan ShrW 22-06-2011 Ghl<LttwthT ^w^rf ^ 1^^ <n»(^T< ^3TRiH3i7^r astwa^ Shri A. N. Bhakta, counsel for the p^titioner. copy. Shri A. V. Shridhar, Panel Lawyer Heard. Learned counsel appearing for the entitfed to benefrt of two advance increm^nts on account of she having passed Diploma in Teaching Examination befor] submitted that the issue invoived in the rf)resent petition is no longer res integra for the State/respondents on advance petitioner submits that the petrtioner is 9 appointment at her own cost It is and the same has been finaily decided b) of Asha Saxena vs. Stste ofM.P.& Or\ submitted that the petitioner has obtair) i the Hon'bte Supreme Court inthe ca.se ;., 2009 (II!) MPJR(SC)59. It is further ed Diploma in Teaching Examination, which acpording to the petitioner is equi^alent to Degree of B. EdJB.TJ, and on thatveryground, she is also erititted for s^ich benefit There is no materiat on record t4 show that the State Government has considered the Diploma in Teaching Ex^mination is equivatent to Degree of B. Ed./B.T.i. certificate. | However, it wilt be open for the ()etitioner to prefer representation to the State Government forgrant oftwo advar passed Dipioma in Teaching Examinati^ the representation as to whether the p^ benefit cn the ground that she holds Dipl' With the aforesaid observation, tl1 |ce increments on account of she having |n. The State Government may consider Ititioner is also entrtled for grant of such >ma in Teaching Examination. is petition is finalty disposed off. Sd/- > ManindraMohanShrivastava Judge WW-fi^^^ ^"llriO, WRT?iri?—FS/140—2/2011—1,50,000. -I