IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. (T) No. 12307 of 2008. Decided on 27th April, 2011. _____________________________________________________ Balak Ram Ghinta. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 and 2. : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. None for respondents No. 3 to 10. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Ms. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to subsequent development in law pertaining to the subject of reservation. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge April 27, 2011. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. - 2 - - 3 - `