1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARBITRATION APPEAL NO.12 OF 2007 C.D.Shah & Ors. .. Appellants Versus M.D.Shah & Ors. .. Respondents WITH ARBITRATION APPEAL NO.13 OF 2007 M/s.K.M.Developera & Ors. .. Petitioners Versus Shah Kumar Giridharlal & Ors. .. Respondents WITH ARBITRATION APPEAL NO.14 OF 2007 M/s.K.M.Developers .. Appellants Versus Shah Kumar Giridharlal & Ors. .. Respondents WITH ARBITRATION APPEAL NO.15 OF 2007 M/s.K.M.Developers & Ors. .. Appellants Versus Kiritkumar Giridharlal Shah and Ors. .. Respondents WITH ARBITRATION APPEAL NO.16 OF 2007 2 M/s.K.M.Developers .. Appellant Versus Kumar Giridharlal Shah .. Respondent WITH ARBITRATION APPEAL NO.17 OF 2007 M/s.K.M.Developers .. Appellant Versus Anantkumar Giridharlal Shah & Ors..Respondents WITH ARBITRATION APPEAL NO.18 OF 2007 M/s.K.M.Developers .. Appellants Versus Kirtikumar Giridharlal Shah .. Respondent Mr.Denzil D’Mello for appellants. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 8th June 2007. P.C. . Since these appeals are nothing but matters arising out of the orders passed by the Arbitral Tribunal having its seat at Mumbai and earlier orders of the Arbitral Tribunal were 3 subject matter of proceedings on the Original Side, although, the matters being styled as Arbitration Appeal, it would be fair, just and proper that the matters are transmitted to the Original Side for being placed before the learned Judge taking Arbitration Petitions. 2. This order is passed because, although, styled as appeals, some of the matters were placed earlier before the learned Single Judge on the Original Side as the Arbitral Tribunal is exercising jurisdiction at Mumbai. Office to act accordingly. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)