Civil Revision No. 4326 of 2011 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 4326 of 2011 Date of Decision: 20.7.2011 Sham Lal Gupta …Petitioner Versus Rajiv Gupta and Others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. P.K.Kukreja, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) In the present case, father and son are involved in a fierce litigation. Mr. P.K. Kukreja, Advocate, appearing for the petitioner/defendant No.1 to the suit, has submitted that the son has filed a suit against his father for permanent injunction seeking a restraint order that he along with his family should not be dispossessed from the house, which admittedly belong and is owned by the petitioner-father. The trial Court, vide its order dated 10.11.2010 (Annexure P2), had declined ad interim injunction to the son-plaintiff. Aggrieved against the same, plaintiff/respondentNo.1 filed an appeal. The lower Appellate Court, vide its order dated 26.3.2011 (Annexure P1), held that the plaintiff/respondent No.1 was in peaceful possession of the portion on the ground floor of the house in question, therefore, he can only be dispossessed in due course of law. Learned counsel for the petitioner has admitted that the petitioner-father/defendant No.1 to the suit in question has also instituted Civil Revision No. 4326 of 2011 2 a Civil Suit bearing No. 176 dated 1.10.2010 seeking dispossession of the respondent-son from the portion of the demised house. That being so, no fault can be found with the impugned order. This Court shall refrain to comment upon merits of the case as it may not prejudice the stand taken by both the parties to the suit filed by them. However, taking totality of the circumstances into consideration, without causing any interference in the impugned order (Annexure P1) passed by the lower Appellate Court, the District Judge, Patiala, is directed to assign both Civil Suit No. 176 dated 1.10.2010, which according to learned counsel, is pending in the Court of Mr. Sunil Kakkar, Civil Judge (Junior Division), Rajpura and the Civil Suit, wherein the impugned order (Annexure P1) has been passed, which according to learned counsel, is pending in the Court of Mr. Amit Kumar Garg, Civil Judge (Junior Division), Rajpura, to one Court, who shall try both these suits simultaneously but separately. Both these suits shall be decided within a period of six months, from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, by affording three effective opportunities to both the parties. This order is passed with the hope that early decision of both the suits may save father and son from the agony of litigation. Moreover, the trial Court may explore the possibility of an amicable settlement by referring the matter to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre. With the observations made above, the present petition is disposed of. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge July 20, 2011 “DK”