,ur/W BEFGRE TEE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARE AT EELA£P€JR (CHHATTISGARH) IN TEE MATTER OF W.P.@3 22/2002 PETITIONER VIJAY KUMAR KASSU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, SON OF LATE w.A.KAssv, SUPERmTmDmG ENGmEER, PLOT No.D—76/SECT0R xv« DEVENDRA NAGAR, RAIPu—x (CHEATTISGARH). ‘ / RESPONDENTS z 1. CHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, THROUGH: SECRETARY, RAEPUR (CHHATTISGARH) . 2 . JOINT SECRETARY (PERSONNEL) CHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, RAIPUR (CHHATTISGARH) . 3 . MADHYA PRADESH ELECTRICITY BOARD , THROUGH: ADDITIONAL SECRETARY, M.P.E .B. JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, FOR ISSUANCE OF ORDER IN NATURE OF WRITS OF MANDAMUS/CERTATORARI OR MY OTHER ORDER IN NATURE OE WRITS. y/ < The petitioner respectfully begs to submit as under:t— 1a: M I u XI—HC-22 mmw $W3né$ U9 l Ua l &uuu Shri Kishore Bhaduri, coun‘sel for the petitioner. Heard. The grievance of the writ etitioner is to the inaction on the part of the opposite paxty in ot giving him suitable posting in terms of the promotion orde dated 25/01/2001(Annexure P/ l), whereby the petitioner as promoted to the post of Supetintending Engineer (Civil). Drawing attention to the s 'd order, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitione that this order was addressed to the Secretary, Chhattisgarh fate Electricity Board, Raipur, who was requested to give suita 1e posting to the petitioner in terms of the promotion order. Since no action was taken thereafter, asserts the petitioner, the representations were sent to the Chhattisgarh State Elecni 'ty Board, vide Annexures P/7, :$&me g P/8, P/ 10 and P/ 11, butfthe same has not been considered and disposed of, he has approached 's Court for relief. Since the representations; are admittedly pending, the i Court thinks it appropriate if th said Authority considers and disposes them of on its own n‘ierits. Accordingly, this writ t {Vito 7W a XI—HC—ZZ W W mm if é (78% W mmawfga WW§fséW $Wm Ling Lhc iespuuLicuL/ appropuate pose of the said representations date of It is made clear that the Opinion on the merits of the lave to be considered bv the 1 merits. 560/ 2002 for urgent hearing also Pcuuuuusichsymcd uf b) duck Authoritv to consider and dis Within a period of eigh1 » communication] receipt of this Court is not expressing any representations which will 1 appropriate authority on its ow; Consequently, LA. No.. 1( stands disposed of. weeks from the order. Sd/- P.C-Naik Judge