1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION rpa CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 720 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST.) NO. 30291 OF 2009 Balu Banan Bhadale & Anr. .. Applicants v/s. Dattoba Shankar Bhadale & Ors. .. Respondents. .... Mr. A.B. Tajane for Applicants. None for the Respondents. .... CORAM : R.G. KETKAR, J. DATE : JUNE 8, 2010. P.C.:- Heard Mr. Tajane for the Applicants. 2. This Civil Application is for setting aside the conditional order passed by the Registrar dated 21st February, 2007 and for restoration of the Appeal, after condoning the delay. Mr. Tajane submitted that the only office objection was to the effect that in the Appeal Memo Respondent No.7-Dyanoba Raghuji Bhadale was not shown. He further submitted that in view of the non-compliance of the office objection, without issuing notice to 2 the Respondent, the Appeal cannot be dismissed for non-removal of the office objection. He further submitted that within one week from today he will remove the office objection. 3. In view of the above, the Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). 4. Amendment to be carried out within one week from today. [ R. G. KETKAR, J. ]