IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 8959 of 2005 Between: K. bhoopal Reddy, S/o. Malla Reddy, R/o. 2-6-119, Jaipuri Colony, Nagole, R.R.District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Polcie, Warangal, Warangal District. 2 The Station House Officer, Matwada Police Station, Warangal, Warangal District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to Issue an appropriate Order Writ or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the 2nd respondent in visiting the house of the petitioner time and again and attempting to apprehend the petitioner without there being any complaint or case registered against him as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Article 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to forthwith return the photographs, R.C.and other personal documents which were taken away by him on 2.4.2005 and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.M.VENKATA SWAMY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: When the matter has been taken up for hearing on 03-03-2008 none appeared and therefore it was posted to this day under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today also none appears. 2. The only grievance of the petitioner is that the 2nd respondent- Station House Officer, Matwada police station, Warangal is visiting his house and attempting to apprehend him without there being any complaint or case registered against him. 3. Counter has been filed stating that based on a complaint a case in Cr.No.94 of 2005 was registered under Sections 405 and 420 IPC on 27-03-2005 by the Assistant Sub- Inspector of Police, Matwada police station and in that connection only information has been gathered and therefore, it cannot be said that without there being any registration of crime or complaint petitioner is sought to be arrested. 4. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, Writ Petition is dismissed. Interim order granted earlier is vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J 10th March, 2008 Tsy