li8 vr BC.rafa'" IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH c?? W.P:"No.5^'.?/06 •^lr PETITIONER <1?N ,~^^ .-•/ .^ ''k?l:"nV ^T^"^- .s^/" ^.^y ^'^ '^-•" /: Smt Premlata Coudhary, W/o Shri Vijay Choudhary, Aged about 42 Yrs. Auxiliary Nurse Midwife, Presently posted at, Sub Center- Gram Rakhi, Community Health Center, Kurud, District Dhamtari (C.G.), R/o Gram Rakhi, Kurud, District Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT / 1. Stateof.C.G. Through: Secretary, Health & Public Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G-) /2. BIock Medical Officer, Kurud, District Dhamtari (C.G.) / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPMATE WRIT, WRITS, ORDER. DIRECTIONS ETC. \ XI-HC-22 3sr <-qrat?pr, sTfl^'is, Ridiyy Sfl^I 45|tft *11*1WI«)*11«t>""""""""'T" W1' 200 f^^; W^iTW f^iwsn^r sh*ii°bgfer ^-} sii^i ^wiwgfer 12-7-2006:- Shri Manish Sharma, counseji Miss Dipaii Pandey, Panel advancecopy. Heard both the counsel. 'he main grievance raised that she is working as Auxiliary Nu| Heaith Centre, Kurud, she has be^ vide order dated 29-6-2006 by re^ Chief Medical and Health Officer, has been effected on the request of| Learned counsei for the never made such a request and sh( of her own request and that is why i( order itself that they are fransferr4< counse! for the petitioner further may be al!owed to make a detailed rectifying this mistake to which ieaf objection. Having heard learned counsjs record, without expressing any opiji made by iearned counsel for fhe therefore, the petitioner is allowe^ along with copy of this petition to i|e days from today and in .turn, decide representation of the |for the petitioner. L]awyer for the State/respondents, on respo^tdent petitioifier tii<<rn<fl-i iiHcti'^"tei<n <Rft<;i< l?3)1^IT3n^fT Vy the petitioner in this writ petition is 1-se Midwife (ANM) at the Community ^n transferred on her own expenses tpondent No.1 to Jashpur under the |Jashpur considering that ihe transfer |the petitioner. ^titioner submitted that the petitioner i^ has been transferred on the ground has been mentioned in the impugned •4d on their own expenses. Learned .i(bmitted that, therefore, the petitioner representation to respondent No.1 for (•ned counse! for respondents has no ^al for the parties, having perused the lion on the merit of the case, prayer j?etitioner is just, fair and reasonabte, to make a detailed representation ifespondent No.1 wlthin a period of No.1 is directed to consider and ijier within a period of 30 days from the (^^iir) XI-HC-22 *IIIMI a»*ii<h 3F5? •^ww<<, oTflu'is, Riwitfy 311^1 ra«h H^ 200 t^g sii^affw f^iwan^w ^s aiiiwg Barve y/ y v ^ 311^1 ^'wiwsfer -^- date of .receipt of representation, in However, as the petitioner haj the petitioner whereas, no such req4 the post whsre the petitioner is view of the above, effect and operatj respect of the petitioner sha! been transferred on the request of (est was made by the petitioner and wor^ing is still fying vacant, therefore, in |on of the impugned transfer order in rerrjain stayed ti!l the decision of the With the direction aforesaid, th Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.2( Parties are entitled for certifiect <M<irci<n-< tiiH<iT^teA <f»i*<i< ^aif^ffsn^r >n objective manner, in accordance i petition stands disposed of. )6 also stands disposed of. copy of this order. Sd'- L.C. Bt^iWO Judge (^E^)