Mb} ’LkZi/é IN THE .P. STaTE £DNINXSTRATIVE'TRIBUN&L AT JAB&LPUR (N. U.R.ND. OF 1998. Pram Narayan Gujar 3/0 Shri.3hiu Ram‘ Gujar, aga about 39 years,by profess- ion Sub Engineer( Civil },Uater Re3n— urces Dapartment, presently uarking at ahatagaan Sub Division No.2,Raipur, District Raipur (MJ—h) ¢.&oc~ RFPLICANT US 1a State of Madhya Pradesh through the Secretary, Mater Resaurces Bapartment, vallabh ahauan, Bhopal (m.p.) Engineer-in7 ChieF, water Resaqrcea DepartmEnt, ahopal (m.P.) 3. Pradeep Kumar Gupta, assistant Enginear, watgr Resuurces Department,through the Head 0f Department,E—in—B,water Resaurces Dapartment Bhapal'(m. .) 4. adhuresh Kumar Sara?,Assistant Engineer, threugh Head of Department,E—in—S, mater Resaurcea Dgpartment,8hnpal (M.P;) RESPUNDENTS £PPLIC&TIUN UNDER SECTIQN 19 OF &DWINISTRATIVE THIBUN£L ACT Wm WWW/9g...W mwm (W) Wmam maimm WW#WW $mm21 an Shrivastava, J. swim-«1&6 ma SB : Hon’Ne Shri Manindra Moh 29-01 -2010 When the matter’was q petitioner and the matter, was I appears for the petitioner e Shri Arvind Dubey, alied for hearing, none appears tor the esed over. Even in the second can, none p Paper awyer for the Statefrespondents NM e$ 2‘ None for other responden . Heard Learned State counsei eubmits that ae the reiief granted the petition has become infructuous‘ reserved to the petitioner to revive the' iti survives Whotiy or in part for consideration, amtrtioner forthwith .Manindra Mohan Shrivastava He referring to averments made in the return prayed for by the petitioner in the petition hae the etition is diemieeed as having been rendered in view of foregoing, infructuous. However, liberty i petition, if the pause of action s A copy of the order be sent to tr