IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 10763 of 2008 Between: Relli Adarsha DWCUA Mahila Seva Sangham, Bapatla, Guntur District, rep.by its President Vaddadi Polamma, W/o.Ramana Rao, aged 33 years R/o.1-4-43/1 , 3rd Ward, Railu Peta, Bapatla, Guntur District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Municipal Council, rep.by its Chair person, Bapatla Municipal Council, Bapatla, Guntur District 2 The Commissioner, Bapatla Municipality Bapatla, Guntur District 3 The Commissioner & Director of Municipal Administation Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more particularly a writ in the nature of writ of mandmaus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in not continuing the petitioner Society for doing Sanitation work in Bapatla Municipality by implementing the instructions issued by the 3rd respondent vide Roc.No.6755/2001/N4 dated 4.6.2004 as illegal, arbitrary, and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to continue the petitioner Society for doing Sanitation work by setting aside the REsolution passed by the 1st respondent vide No.493 dated 29.4.2008 as the same is passed contrary to the instructions of the 3rd respondent and to pass such other or further orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.E.SAMBASIVA PRATAP Counsel for the Respondent No.1& 2: MR.S.NAGESWARA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent NO.3: G.P.FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION. The Court made the following : . HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA W.P.No.10763 of 2008 ORDER: Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. Permission accorded. Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. _____________________________ (GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J) 22-12-2008 Gsn.