1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC No. 5 of 2011. Decided on: 1. 7. 2011. Ishwar Dass & others ....Petitioners. Versus Srikant Baldi & another ....Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. ________________________________________________________ For the petitioners : Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the intervening developments, it cannot be said that there is contumacious conduct on the part of the respondents. Though, the order has been passed, but the consequential benefits have not been granted to the petitioners. The consequential benefits, pursuant to the judgment dated 8th April, 2010, rendered by this Court in CWP (T) No. 16325 of 2008, titled as Ishwar Dass & others versus State of Himachal Pradesh & another, if not already disbursed, shall be disbursed 2 to the petitioners, within a period of two months. Subject to the above, the COPC is dismissed, discharging the notice. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. July 1, 2011 (Justice V.K. Sharma) (LSP/hl) Judge.