1 lgc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5534 OF 2009 M/s.Shala Video Game Centre Through its Proprietor Altaf Shakoor Shaikh : Petitioner versus The Commissioner of Police & Anr. : Respondents. Mr.N P Mishra for the Petitioner. Mr C R Sonawane, AGP, for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM : S B MHASE & R M SAVANT, JJ. DATE : 27th July 2009 P.C. 1. Heard. Perused the order dated 23rd November 2006 as also the Affidavit-in-Reply dated 24th July 2009 filed by one Sukhdeo Bhausaheb Ohol on behalf of the Respondent No.1. Reading of the said order dated 23rd November 2006 discloses that the Appellate Authority allowed the appeal filed by the Petitioner and order passed by the Commissioner of Pune came to be set aside. The Petitioner has prayed vide Prayer clause (a) that Respondent No.1 be directed to issue the license to the Petitioner for running the Video Game Parlour forthwith. 2 In the Affidavit in Reply filed on behalf of the Respondent No.1 in Para 5 thereof it has been stated that the Petitioner had made an application for grant of Video Game License with 8 machines only. Therefore, if the Petitioner deposits a sum of Rs.54,400/- towards license fees, the Commissioner of Police would grant Video Game Parlour License with 8 machines to the Petitioner. 2. In view of what has been stated in the said Para 5 of the Affidavit in Reply, the Petitioner would be entitled to the grant of license for Video Game Parlour with 8 machines on him depositing the said sum of Rs.54,400/-. In view of the above, no further directions are necessary to be issued. The above Petition is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- sd/- [R.M.SAVANT, J] [S.B.MHASE, J]