IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6277 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision 09.09.2009 Gian Singh and another ...... Petitioners VERSUS Jagtar Singh and others ...... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Dr.Naresh Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.G.S.Sandhawalia, Advocate, for Mr.Hemant Saini, Advocate, for respondent No.1. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J(ORAL): Aggrieved against the order dated 01.10.2008, passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jalandhar, whereby the application of defendants- petitioners (herein referred as 'the petitioners') under Order 6 Rule 17 read with Order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C., was allowed and respondents No.9 to 18 i.e. defendants No.6 to 15 (herein referred as respondents No.9 to 18 ) were impleaded as defendants. Gurdial Singh, being co-sharer, has sold the property exceeding his share which has been challenged by the plaintiffs. Respondents No.9 to 18 are the legal representatives of Gurdial Singh, thus they are sought to be impleaded as defendants in order to avoid the dismissal of the suit for want of technical objection of non-joinder of necessary parties. Heard. The trial Court has rightly allowed the application because the property of Gurdial Singh, which is subject matter of the suit, has been sold by respondents No.9 to 18. As such, they being the necessary party were rightly impleaded as defendants. Resultantly, finding no merit in the petition, the same is dismissed. However, the trial Court will consider all the other pleas as raised by the plaintiffs in the suit. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 09.09.2009 mamta-II