((-1-)) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION BIFR REFERENCE NO.45 OF 1995 Jayanti Business Machines Ltd. Company WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.537 OF 1996 M/s.Market Analysts & Product Promoters Applicant versus Jayanti Business Machines Ltd. Respondent WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.726 OF 1996 M/s.Apple Industries Ltd. Applicant versus Jayanti Business Machines Ltd. Respondent WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.39 OF 1997 Jindal Cosmetics Ltd. Applicant versus Jayanti Business Machines Ltd. Respondent WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.102 OF 1997 A. Global Finance Ltd. Applicant versus Jayanti Business Machines Ltd. Respondent WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.200 OF 1997 Calculus Credit Ltd. Applicant versus Jayanti Business Machines Ltd. Respondent WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.285 OF 1997 ((-2-)) Overseas Sanmar Financial Ltd. Applicant versus Jayanti Business Machines Ltd. Respondent WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.287 OF 1997 Ceat Financial Services Ltd. Applicant versus Jayanti Business Machines Ltd. Respondent WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.669 OF 1997 Intec Polymers Ltd. Applicant versus Jayanti Business Machines Ltd. Respondent WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.748 OF 1997 Gujarat Lease Financing Ltd. Applicant versus Jayanti Business Machines Ltd. Respondent WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.852 OF 1997 SICOM Limited Applicant versus Jayanti Business Machines Ltd. Respondent WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.137 OF 1999 Pradman Engg. Agencies (I) Ltd. Applicant versus Jayanti Business Machines Ltd. Respondent WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.662 OF 1999 The Stock Exchange Applicant versus Jayanti Business Machines Ltd. Respondent N.A.Mehta for petitioner in C.P.No.137/1999. Manoj Sharma i/by A.V.Doigode in C.P.No.537/1996 for petitioner. ((-3-)) Miss Rekha V. Taoda i/by M/s.M.V.Kini & Co. for petitioner. Tushar Gaudia i/by K.P.Jain in C.P.No.662/1999 for petitioner. Prakash Panjabi for petitioner in C.P.No. 852 of 1997. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 29th June 2006 PC : 1. When this petition namely BIFR Reference No.45 of 1995 along with other petitions was placed before me for directions, the Deputy Official Liquidator makes a statement that the respondent company M/s.Jayanti Business Machines Limited has already been wound up by this Court in Company Petition No.859 of 1997 vide order dated 21st May 2005. The Official Liquidator had been appointed as Provisional Liquidator in another petition. It is for the Official Liquidator to take all such steps as are permissible in law. It is not necessary to pass any orders on these petitions or in BIFR Reference as the company is also directed to be wound up. ((-4-)) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)