Crl. Misc. No. M-3838 of 2011 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-3838 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION: 09.05.2011 Lachho and another ..........Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ..........Respondents BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. Raman Mohinder, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, AAG, Punjab. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of Lachho and Amandeep Singh for issuing directions to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect their lives and liberty from the hands of respondent No.4 as they have solemnized their marriage contrary to the wishes of respondent No.4. Notice of motion was issued on 24.3.2011. In response thereto, reply on behalf of respondent-State has been filed in Court today and the same is taken on record. Learned counsel for the respondent-State on the basis of reply submits that statement of respondent No.4 has been recorded, wherein, he has specifically stated that he is not giving any threat to the petitioners and allegations made in the petition are wrong. Learned State counsel also submits that statements of parents as well as other respective persons of Crl. Misc. No. M-3838 of 2011 (2) the village were recorded and in the inquiry report made by SHO, Police Station Sunam, the allegations made in the petition were not found to be correct. ` In view of the submissions made by counsel for the respondent-State and the statement of father of petitioner No.2, no action is required to be taken and the petition has become infructuous. Dismissed as having become infructuous. May 09, 2011 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE