FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of | coram, appearance, court’s orders |Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders | CONTEMPT PETITION NO.252/2009 ....... Shri S.M.Vibhute,Adv.for petr. Shri B.V.Wagh,A.G.P. for Respondents 1 and 2. Shri V.S.Panpatte,Adv.for Respondent no.3 ... CORAM : R.K.DESHPANDE,J. DATE : 18/8/2010. 1] This Contempt Petition complains about willful disobedience of the judgment and order dated 4/4/2005 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 3967/2002. 2] The learned A.G.P. states that the respondents 1 and 2 are personally present in this Court. The learned counsel for respondent no.3 Shri Panpatte states that the respondent no.3 is also personally present in this Court. The respondent no.1 has filed an affidavit stating that the order has been complied with. The respondent no.3 has also filed affidavit stating that the proposal for release of grants for the petitioner-society was required to be submitted. It is further stated that the petitioner submitted the proposal to the office of the Education Officer on 8/1/2008 and it was forwarded to the office of the Deputy Director of Education, Latur by respondent no.3 with recommendation on 18/2/2009. Thus respondent no.3 has also claimed that the order has been complied with. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute this position. In view of this, the complaint made in the petition does not at all survive and the petition needs to be dismissed. 3] Shri Vibhute, the learned counsel for petitioner submits that instead of the words “dismissal of the petition”, it should be termed as the “petition disposed of”. However, it is not possible to accept the said contention for the reason that there was no time limit prescribed for compliance of the order. The order has been complied with and except to dismiss the petition, no other order can be passed. Hence the said contention is rejected. 4] In view of above, Petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. 5] In view of dismissal of Contempt Petition, Civil Application Nos.11897/10 and 11898/10 do not survive and the same are disposed of. (R.K.DESHPANDE) JUDGE umg/cp252-09