IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.3318 OF 2008 Haresh Luthria ...Plaintiff Vs. Pukraj G. Jain ...Defendant --- Mr. Chandan Athani with Ms. Amruta Bhatha i/b. Sonali Kunekar for Plaintiff None for Defendant ---- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED 7TH AUGUST, 2009 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel on behalf of the Plaintiff. 2. The Plaintiff has filed affidavit of service and original documents viz. bill of exchange dated 15.9.2006, notice dated 30.3.2008 and particulars of claim. Suit is based on the bill of exchange dated 15.9.2006. In spite of service of writ of summons, none appears on behalf of the Defendant. Plaintiff is, therefore, entitled for judgment and decree as prayed. 3. Suit is decreed in terms of prayer clause 14(a). 4. Refund of court fees is allowed in accordance with rules. V.M. KANADE J.