1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. APPLICATION NO. 4075 OF 2004 CRI. APPLICATION NO. 4075 OF 2004 CRI. APPLICATION NO. 4075 OF 2004 Shri Khwaja @ Babu Hussain Shaikh ...Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. ----- Ms. Kalpana H. Aesankar for Applicant. Shri V.B.Konde -Deshmukh, APP for Respondent. ----- CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 06.10.2004 DATED : 06.10.2004 DATED : 06.10.2004 PC :- PC :- PC :- . Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Perused the record. . I see no reason to depart from the opinion expressed by the court below in rejecting the prayer for bail made at the instance of the Applicant. There is ample evidence to connect the applicant with the offence. Even while, dismissing this application, interest of justice would be met, if the trial court is directed to expedite the hearing of the case by assigning the case to the Fast Track Court, so as to ensure early disposal of the case, preferably within 9 months from today. If the trail court is of the opinion that the Applicant is responsible for causing delay in conclusion of the trial that fact may be recorded in the Rozanama. Order accordingly. 2 .....