WA 372/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE J.CHELAMESWAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE I.A.ANSARI Heard Mrs.SB Choudhury, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mrs. B Goy al, learned State Counsel, appearing for Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3. The instant appeal is preferred by the appellant, who was Respondent No.4 in WP( C) 4989/2009, against the order, dated 18.11.2009, whereby the said writ petitio n was disposed of with certain directions. The writ petitioner’s case and the di rections given in the writ petition are explicitly set out in the order under ap peal itself. The order, dated 18.11.2009, aforementioned, is reproduced below:- Considering the nature of the grievance expressed and the relief prayed for, th is petition is disposed of at the motion stage. Briefly stated, the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the r espondent No.3, the Chief Executive Officer, Karimganj Zilla Parishad, Karimganj , vis-à-vis his representation dated 11/11/2009 submitted before him (respondent No.3) complaining of his inability to join as Tax Collector cum in-charge Secre tary of Veterbond Gaon Panchayat. According to the petitioner, though he reporte d at his new place of posting as above being transferred by the order dated 4/11 /2009 of the Chie Executive Officer, Karimganj Zilla Parishad, he was not allowe d to join. Being aggrieved, he on 11/11/2009 submitted the aforementioned repres entation before the above authority for appropriate action. He is before this Co urt as the representation stand unattended as on date. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and the pleaded facts as well a s the documents appended to the writ petition, this petition is closed with a di rection to the Chief Executive Officer, Karimganj Zilla Parishad, respondent No. 3, to consider and dispose of the petitioner’s representation with consequential action within two days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order . The petitioner would furnish a copy of this order before the aforementioned au thority so as to enable him to do the needful. The petition stands allowed in the above terms. No costs. The appellant herein is the President of Beterbond Gaon Panchayat, where the wri t petitioner had not been allowed to join in terms of the order of transfer pass ed, in this regard, on 4.11.2009. From the facts narrated in the order under app eal, it is clear that the writ petitioner had not been allowed to join at his pl ace of posting and he, therefore, made a representation, in this regard, to the Respondent No.3, who was competent authority to consider and pass necessary orde r on the said representation. As the representation remained unattended, the lea rned Single Judge directed the respondent No.3 to consider and dispose of the wr it petitioner’s representation with consequential action within two days from th e date of receipt of the certified copy of the order. There is no positive direc tion to the respondent No.3 to pass any order on the said representation in any particular manner. Being the competent authority to consider the representation, it was for the respondent No.3 to pass appropriate order on the said representa tion. As the respondent No.3 had failed to discharge his duty, the learned Singl e Judge directed, in effect, the competent authority to carry out the duty impos ed by law, we find no infirmity in the directions, given by the learned Single Judge by the order under appeal. We, therefore, do not see any reason warranting our interference with the said order. We may point out that it has been submitted, on behalf of the appellant, that th ere are serious allegations against the writ petitioner involving him in some co rruption cases and it was for this reason that the objection had been raised by the Gaon Panchayat to the order of posting of the writ petitioner. If such alle gations have been made, the authority to take necessary decision, in the matter, still remains with the Respondent No.3. Viewed from this angle also, we see no reason to interfere with the order under appeal. Appeal is, therefore, not admitted and shall accordingly stands dismissed.