KJ 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.227 OF 1998 ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions & Registrar’s orders None for the appellants. Ms.A.R.S.Baxi for the respondent Nos.1 & 2 CORAM : A.S.OKA, J DATE : 25/8/2010 P. C.: 1 Advocate for the appellant has not complied with the direction of this Court to serve notice of the 3 rd respondent by substituted service. The 3 rd respondent is the insured. One of the grounds in the appeal is that the appellant was not liable to pay the compensation. Hence the 3 rd respondent is a necessary party to the appeal. If no steps are taken KJ 2 by the appellant for complying with order of publishing notice of the 3rdrespondent within four weeks from today, the appeal will stand dismissed for non prosecution without further reference to the Court. (JUDGE)