IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2685 of 2008 Israil Ahmad, S/O Late Md. Leyakat Hussain, resident of Village- Fauladpur, P.O. Ratni Bazar, P.S. Sakurabad, District-Jehanabad ----------------Petitioner Versus 1. The Chief Secretary, Govt.Of Bihar, Patna 2. The Secretary, Human Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar,Patna 3. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar,Patna 4. The Superintendent of Education, Gaya 5. The District Provident Fund Officer, Gaya 6. The Treasury Officer, Gaya ----------------- Respondents. ---------------------------------- 02 16-08-2011 Heard Sri Binod Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Shailya Prasad, learned A.C. to A.A.G. no.10, who appears on behalf of all the Respondents. It was submitted by the learned counsel for the State that during the pendency of the present writ petition, all the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to dispute the fact, but submits that the writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the authority concerned if any grievance still exists. In view of the stand taken by the parties, the writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the authority concerned if still grievance raised in the present writ petition has not been redressed. If such representation is filed by the petitioner before the Respondent no.3/ the Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, the Court expects that the same will be examined in its right perspective preferably within a period 2 of four months from the date of filing of such representation. The writ petition stands disposed of. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)