1 appln456.10 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.456 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.764 OF 2009 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.579 OF 2009 AND CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.765 OF 2009 Smt. Neeta Nitin Bhanushali. ....Applicant. Vs. Shri D.B.Negi,Competent Authority, SAFEMA/NDPS & ors. ....Respondents Mr. K.M.Sangani, advocate for applicant. Mr. Mandar Goswami i/b. J.C.Satpute & H.V.Mehta, advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. D.P.Adsule, APP for State. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED:- DECEMBER 16, 2010. P.C. 1. By this application, it is prayed that execution operation of impugned notices issued by the Respondent be stayed and the Respondents be prohibited from acting upon on the basis of the said show cause notices. It is seen that this very relief has been claimed in the Writ Petitions in terms of the prayer clauses (c) and (d) respectively. When the Writ Petitions were admitted on 30th March, 2 appln456.10 2009 after hearing both the sides, the Court however, chose to grant limited interim relief directing that no third party interest shall be created in the property. No ground for review of the said order has been made out. The relief, as claimed in this application, cannot be entertained by way of successive application. Hence, this application is rejected. 2. However, since the Writ Petitions are admitted and purport to challenge is to the show cause notices, in our opinion, the said writ petitions should proceed for hearing forthwith. 3. Counsel for the Applicant/Petitioner however, submits that he is not prepared to proceed with the hearing of the Petition. In the circumstances, writ petitions shall now come for hearing under caption “final disposal” on 7th February, 2011. (A.P.BHANGALE, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)