CROPC No. 7 of 2004. 12.5.2008 Present: Mr. Ankush Dass Sood and Ms. Shweta Joolka, Advocates for the Petitioner. Mr. N.K. Thakur, Advocate for respondent No.1. Ms. Anita Dogra vice counsel for respondents No. 2 & 3. According to the petitioner, it is a criminal contempt. However, we do not find any permission of the learned Advocate General, which is a condition precedent to file criminal contempt. It is not a suo motu case by the concerned court. Accordingly, it is open for the petitioner to move for the permission of the learned Advocate General. In such circumstances, the petition is dismissed as not maintainable with liberty to the petitioner to file criminal contempt in case the permission is granted by the learned Advocate General. (Jagdish Bhalla) Chief Justice. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge. May 12, 2008. (cr/gr)