IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.673 of 2008 ARUN KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 5. 05.05.2009 The office report dated 4.5.2009 and the copy of orders at flag ‘A’ and flag ‘B’ shows that the computer has given two print outs of the order dated 27.2.2009 meaning thereby two types of order were pronounced and, therefore, the computer has generated two types of the same order which are indicated at flag ‘A’ and flag ‘B’. In order to clarify the matter, a report was called for from Mr. M. Rahman, the Secretary who had typed the order and had pronounced the same. The explanation is at flag ‘A/1’. It is stated in the explanation that in both the orders, the material portion of the order is same but in one order the names of the parties have been typed in detail and in another one the names of the parties is mentioned in short as has been mentioned in the case title of the record. It is explained that the order in which the case title has been mentioned in short is the only order which was signed by the Hon’ble Judge but due to mistake the another order of the same kind was also created with details of the parties and though such order was not signed by the Hon’ble Judge, but by mistake that order was also pronounced in the computer, hence, computer has generated two types of the same order. The Secretary has begged apology for the mistake and has stated that no such mistake will - 2 - occur in future. Thus, due to mistake the order dated 27.2. 2009 with details of the parties as mentioned at flag ‘A’ was generated and pronounced by the Secretary, hence the same is ordered to be deleted from the computer. Let the NIC be directed for deleting the order dated 27.2.2009 with details of the parties as is indicated at flag ‘A’. (C.M. Prasad, J.) Ravi/-