QD ....^'i c<: ?®&,^...... IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (St N0. l^69> OF 2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 7,^ 1. ^^ N ^^ ^^^ 2. ^^M"^ '\^. ^"(^y.SJ Basant Kumar Yadav, S/o Late Shri Ramesh Yadav, aged about 22 years, Ward No.2, Fhooljhariya Para, Sarangarh, District Raigarh (CG). Versus Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Danganiya, Raipur, through its Secretary. Executive Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Raigarh, District Raigarh (CG). Executive Engineer (STRI), Construction Sub Division, Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Ambikapur, District Sarguja(CG). Assistant Engineer (Construction Sub Division), Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Sarangarh, District Raigarh (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 3. r HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR (Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker) Writ Petition (S) No. 1268 of2009 PETITIONER Basant Kumar Yadav VERSUS RESPONDENTS Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board and others Shri U.R. Koshley counsel for the petitioner. Shri Brajesh Singh on behalf of Shri A.S. Gaharwar counsel for the respondents. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF TME CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORDER (01.10.2010) Looking to the point involved in this writ petition counsel for the respondents submits that let the petitioner makea fresh representation beforerespondent No.2 and the same would be decided in accordance with law. Counsel for the petitioner being in agreement with the proposition of the counsel for the respondents submits that let a direction may be issued for deciding the representation so madein accordance with law and in that event he may be permitted to withdraw this petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. If the petitioner makes a representation before respondent No.2 within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the same is expected to be decided in accordance with law. F Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge •f^