IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO. 14 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 438 OF 2009 SHRI KASHINATH SHETYE AND 8 ORS., ... Applicants Versus THE STATE OF GOA THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY AND 8 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Ryan Menezes, Advocate for the Applicants/Petitioner. Mr.S.S. Kantak, Advocate General with Mr. A. Kamat, Additional Government Advocate for respodnent no.1. Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, Senior Advocate with Mr. H.D. Naik, Advocate for Respondent no.10. Coram:- A. S. OKA & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 6th July, 2010 P.C: We have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the Applicants, in support of the review petition. His submission is that while deciding the writ petition, this Court has placed reliance on decisions of the Apex Court which were not applicable in the case. He submitted that the decisions were in cases where there were no rules or where the rules did not prescribe the mode of appointment. 2. After having heard the learned counsel for the applicants and after having perused the record, we find that there is no error apparent on the face of the record. The alleged error pointed out cannot be a ground for review. Even otherwise, there is no ground for review. Hence, the application is rejected. A. S. OKA, J. F. M. REIS, J. ap/-