SSK/90* 1 caw 2082.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2082 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2151 OF 2011 Shaikh Rashid Abdul ....Petitioner Versus Sayyed Mustaq Salauddin & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. R. V. Govilkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P. S. Dani, Advocate for respondent no.10. CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATED : 29th SEPTEMBER, 2011. P.C.: Mr. Govilkar, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press for prayer (b) at this stage. 2. By the order impugned in the writ petition, the petitioner’s election is set-aside on the ground that he has begotten third child after the cut-off date. The writ petition is already admitted. The petitioner’s tenure will come to an end in the month of February, 2012. The applicant wants to contest the election to the Pune Municipal Corporation for the Year 2012. However, the impugned order in the writ petition will come in his way. Therefore, he has taken out the present civil application for expeditious hearing of the writ petition. Having regard to the above circumstances, I am SSK/90* 2 caw 2082.11 of the opinion that a case for early hearing is made out. The Registry is, therefore, directed to fix this matter for final hearing on weekly board in the week commencing from 17th October, 2011. 3. The civil application is, accordingly, disposed of. (RANJIT MORE, J.)