1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2043/03 Dhanna Lal vs. State & Anr. Date of order : 19/1/2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Amit Jindal for the petitioner. Shri Pawan Sharma for the respondent no.2. ****** This writ petition has been filed with the prayer that the respondents be directed to grant pension and other retiral benefits to the petitioner from the date of his retirement on 30.6.1999 as Naka Guard with Municipal Board, Bundi. Shri Pawan Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Municipal Board, Bundi submitted that they have already forwarded the case of the petitioner to the Government as due to having financial constraint, the Municipal Board is not in a position to provide all the retiral benefits and other dues to the petitioner. The writ petition was filed in the beginning of the year 2003. Neither the State of Rajasthan, nor the Municipal Board, Bundi has filed any reply to the writ petition controverting the pleas set up by 2 the petitioner. In view of Rule 89 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1996, a government servant is entitled to receive all his retiral benefits including pension immediately after his retirement and in no case later than 60 days and in the event of delay beyond the period of 60 days, he would be entitled to interest @ 9% on the delayed payment. In view of the above, the writ petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to provide to the petitioner regular pension from 1st July, 1999 on month to month basis and all other retiral dues together with arrears thereof with interest @ 9% per annum. Compliance of the judgment be made within three months from the date copy of this judgement is produced before the respondent. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/