THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO.936 OF 2005 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice B.Prakash Rao) Heard both the sides. The appellant-unsuccessful writ petitioner filed this appeal, inter alia, aggrieved by the order dated 19.01.2005 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.No.20649 of 2004, wherein he sought a direction to the third respondent-Directorate of Sainik Welfare to grant monthly pension of Rs.300/- per month along with all arrears from the date of eligibility, without insisting on his original certificates. The case of the appellant-petitioner, in brief, is that he is an ex-serviceman in the Indian Army and served as a non-commissioned officer during the II World War from 1944 to 1946. Afterwards, he worked in several departments and during the course of his service in the District Water Works Department, Hyderabad, the department obtained all original certificates from his and forwarded the same to the Accountant General, Hyderabad, seeking clarification. Apart from quoting of all his credentials, a short submission is made that in spite of his filing repeated applications before the respondents, including the third respondent herein, his pension is not fixed and paid and therefore, he is entitled to the same from the date he is eligible. Having heard on either side, the learned Single Judge opined that even though the respondents filed counter affidavit to the effect that the request made in the Writ Petition is quite belated one and it cannot be acceded to, however, taking into consideration the services rendered by the petitioner, stated that there is no justification on the part of the respondents, including the third respondent herein, to withhold or grant the pension as the said delay does not come against the petitioner to lay any claim. In view of the same, the Writ Appeal is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a comprehensive detailed representation before the respondents, including the third respondent, within a period of two {2} weeks from today, and on receipt thereof, the respondents are directed to consider the same on merits and dispose of in accordance with law. No costs. Office is directed issue a copy to the appellant-petitioner and also to the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant- petitioner through legal aid. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) ________________ (SANJAY KUMAR, J) 3rd August 2010 RRB