y \ errs~~) /- irafflS® IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.t WRIT PETITION (51 N0. '^3-33. _QF 2009 PETITIQNER RESPQNDENTS y' ...-•^ :A Maniram Bhagat, aged about 40 Son of Late Dayaram Bhagat, Assistant Soil Conservation Officer Bilaspur. Resident of Ghasiya Para Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through : The Secretary, Agricultural and Rural Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2". The Director, Agriculture, Raipur (C.G.). 3." The Joint Director, Agriculture Division, Bilaspur (C.G.). 4. The Assistant Soil Conservation Officer, Sub Division Bilaspur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA weSl^TTC;IR; Wii s?it?f wfe~ 2^ ?s; ^i<<i<r)A|, yti1yi<o, fsK'fl^y ^.E...^^..^.2^^, SB : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE tnRITINKERDIWAKBR 10.08,2009 Shri Prakash Mishra, Shri Vivek Sha.rma, P. L. coilnsel At the outset counsel foit present petition with liberty to| No.l raising ail his grievances| dated 29.6.2009. He howeverl directed to decide the represent^tion Counsel for the State hals the petitioner is decided by tl-|( with law. Accordingly, the petition) liberty as aforesaid. In the evei^tuali petitioner within a period of te4 of this order, the same is period of three weeks from the ^jR^ff ^* f^^t <r;n-^.i< ^i'atfin.sfn^i for the petitioner. br the State. the petitioner wants to withdraw the fiie representation before respondent against the iinpugned transfer order submits that the said authority be so made expeditiously. s no objection if the representation of e authority concemed in accordance is dismissed as withdrawn with the ;4tuality of filing representation by the days from the date of receipt of copy to be decided within a further 4ate ofits receipt. __——-- Sd/- pritinker Diwaker Judge exp|ected