HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH GORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV QUPTA, CJ. & HON'BLE SHRI RAN6NATH CHANDRAKAR, J. Appllcants Appellants/ Claimants M.C.C.No.37of2010 1 Rajneesh Jain aged about 33 years, son ofVijay KumarJain. 2 Ku. Rashi Jain, aged about 06 years. 3 Ku. Riya Jain, aged 06 months. Appellants No.2 and 3 minor daughters through their natural guardian Amicus Curiae Rajneesh Jain, the appellant No.1. All resident of Priyadarshini Nagar, Police Station New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur (CG). VERSUS 1. Omprakash Sahu, son of Daugram Sahu, R/o. Village Joundhi, Poltee Station Nayapara, Rajim, Tahsil and Djstrict Raipur (CG). 2. Harimohan Vishwas son of late Gayabodh Vishwas, Police Station and Post Mana Camp, TahsJI and Distrtet Raipur (CG). 3. United India Insurance Co. Limited., through Divjsional Manager, Djvisional Officer, Krishna Complex, Kachahri Chowk, Raipur (CG). ApDlication for restoration of M.A.(C).No.1Q27 of 2009 Non-Applicants/ Respondents Present: Ms. Maya Verma, counsel for the petitioners. ORDER sth (25lnJanuary,2010). The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. ^K'®:?^^%fSSI^iili:J^;s|^^ t^ Ms. Maya Verma, learned counsel for the petttioners is heard on the restoration petition. 2) The petitionere are seeking re^oration of MA(C) No.1027/2009 which wasdismissed for want of prosecution vide orderdated 17.12.2009. 3) On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners and the grounds taken in the restoration petition, we are satisfled that the absence of the petitioners'/appellants' counsel on 17.12.2009, when M.A.(C). No.1027/2009 was taken-up for hearing, was based on bona fide grounds. 4). M.C.C.No.37/2010, therefore, is allowed and MA(C) No.1027/2009 js restored to its original number. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge subbu