*1* 6.nms.110.11.s.52.11.sxw skt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 110 OF 2011 IN SUIT NO. 52 OF 2011 Asian Paints Limited ..Plaintiffs -Versus- Deshraj Brush Company & Anr. ..Defendants .......... Mr.Vinod Bhagat, a/w. Mr.Punit Jani, Mr.Dhiren Karania, Mr.Suryank Rao i/by G.S.Hegde & V.A.Bhagat the Plaintiffs. Mr.Manoj Kariya a/w. Mr.Kiran Mohite for the Defendants. .......... CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 25TH JANUARY 2011. P.C. 1 The learned advocates appearing for the parties have tendered consent terms dated 25th January 2011 and have submitted that the suit be disposed of in terms of the consent terms. The consent terms are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. The consent terms are signed by the constituted attorney for the plaintiff, the proprietor of defendant no.1 and the proprietor of defendant no.2. The consent terms are also signed by the advocate appearing for the plaintiff as well as the advocate appearing for defendant nos. 1 & 2. This Court has enquired with defendant nos. 1 & 2 whether they have understood the contents of *2* 6.nms.110.11.s.52.11.sxw the consent terms. Defendant Nos.1 has informed the Court that the contents of the consent terms have been interpreted and explained to him in Hindi by Advocate Mr.Kiran Mohite whereas defendant no.2 has informed the court that the consent terms have been interpreted and explained to him in Marathi by Advocate Mr.Kiran Mohite. The undertakings in paragraph nos. 2, 3 and 6 of the consent terms are accepted. 2 The suit is disposed of in terms of the consent terms marked ‘X’. Refund of Court fees as per rules. [S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.]