IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 1588 of 2004 Between: Boddupally Jangaiah, S/o.Lachaiah, R/o Loyapally Village, Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Central Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Director (Commercial), Singareni Bhavan, Lakdikapul, Hyderabad. 2. The Superintending Engineer (Operations), Ranga Reddy Circle South, Central Power Distribution Company of A.P., Hyderabad. 3 The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Operation Sub Division, Central Power Distribution Company of A.P., Ibrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy District. 4. The Inspector of Police, Ibrahimpatnam Police Station, Ibrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not restoring the power supply to SC No.768- Cat.V of Sri B. Lachaiah at Loyapally Village, Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and not taking any action for illegal disconnection of power supply since 2002, as arbitrary, illegal, and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and to issue a consequential direction to the Respondents to restore the power supply to SC No.768-Cat.V of Sri B.Lachaiah, Loyapally Village, Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District forthwith and take appropriate action against the persons those who are responsible for illegal disconnection of power supply in accordance with law. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.SUBBA RAO KORRAPATI Counsel for the Respondents: MRS.M.VINOBHA DEVI (SC FOR APTRANSCO) The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri Subba Rao Korrapati, learned counsel for the petitioner, filed letter dated 30-11- 2004 to the effect that the petitioner instructed him to withdraw the writ petition, as the cause in the petition does not survive, therefore seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded, and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. __________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dt.15-12-2004 Glv/kvrm To 1. The Director (Commercial), The Central Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh, Singareni Bhavan, Lakdikapul, Hyderabad. 2. The Superintending Engineer (Operations), Ranga Reddy Circle South, Central Power Distribution Company of A.P., Hyderabad. 3. The Assistant Divisional Engineer, (Operation) Sub Division, Central Power Distribution Company of A.P., Ibrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy District. 4. The Inspector of Police, Ibrahimpatnam Police Station, Ibrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy District. 5. Two CD copies.