1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 143 OF 2009 WITH FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 144 OF 2009 Rakesh Kisan Pawar ..Appellant versus Sweta Rakesh Pawar ..Respondent Mr. Sachin J. Kadam for Appellant. Ms. Aarti P. Bhide for Respondent. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE & S. J. KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 02, 2009. P.C. : 1. Parties have tendered consent terms duly signed by them and their Advocates, the same are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. 2. Parties are present in court. They state that the consent terms have been entered into by them voluntarily and without any undue influence or pressure. Undertakings given in paragraphs 2 to 4 of the consent terms are accepted. 2 3. We are satisfied that it is an appropriate case to convert the Petition under Section 13(1)B of the Hindu Marriage Act. In view of the admitted position that the parties have lived separately for about four years now and there do not appear to be any chance of reconciliation, there shall be a decree under Section 13 (1)B of the Hindu Marriage Act. Decree be drawn accordingly The consent terms shall be incorporated in the decree. 4. Both the appeals are disposed of accordingly. (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. J. KATHAWALLA, J.)