H10H COURT OF JUDSCATURE AT BiLASPUR. CHHATTiSGARH WRIT PETiTION N0. 50 OF 200S ;TETiONER Vs. 2. 3. Sindeshwari Mahita Swasahayata Samooh, Through - Pressdent, Smt. Darnin Bai, D/o. Santram Deshmukh, aged about - 30, R/o. Village-Aibarash, Tah. & Dis8.-Durg(C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through-Secretar^ Ministry of Food and Civil Supply Department, D.K.5. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) c-0iiector - Food, Durg District-Durg(C.G.) Food Officer Departmerrt of Food and Civii Supplies, Durg, Tah., & Distt.-Durg (C.G.) >ub-diviSiona! Officer (Revenue), Durg District-Durg (C.G.) Present: Shri Shri R.K, Gomasta, tearned eounsel for ths petitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh, learned GA for the State/respondenfs. (Passed on 13"' January, 2006) The Collector - Food, Durg, District Durg passed an order authorizing as many as 65 Socleties to distribute Essentiai Commodities through their fair prlce shops. in pursuance of the said order. the S.D.O. (Revenue), Durg, the fourth respondent hereln, issued authorization to those Societies by his order dated 14-11-2005. Being aggrieved by the order of the Districi Coilector as well as S.D.O. Durg, it is stated, the writ petition No. 6069/2005 and batch were filed in this Court by some aggrieved Societies. In those writ patitions, this Court on 01-12-2005, -A' stayed the order of the District Collector, Durg as weii as S.D.O. Durg with regard to those Societies out of 65 Societtes against which the grievances were made in those writ petitions and that Interim order is stiil in operation. Ths Dlstrict c-0iiector, Du.rg in deference to the interim order passed by this Court and thinking it just and appropriate to stay the order made by him with regard to the remaining Societies aiso, took suo-motu initiative to stay the order with regard to the remaining Societies. The resuitant position is that sven the authorization granted in fa'/our of the petltioner- Society has been stayed by ttie District Coilector (Food), Durg vide his order dated 20-12-2005. Being aggrieved by the said order, this writ petitionisfiled. (2) Having heard learned counsei for the parties, 1 do not think that this is a fst case where the Court shoutd step-iri under Artide 226 and interfere with the order made by the District CoHeetor, Durg in deference to the interim order passed by this Court on 1-12-2005 in W. P. No. 6069 of 2005 and the bateh. Sincs the Segality of the very notification issued by the District Coltector is a subject matter of judiciai review in W.P. No. 6069 of 2005, no exception could be taken to the impugned actton ofthe Dlstrict Collector staylng the authorEation granted sn favour or the petitioner- Society. The wrlt petltion Is, therefore, dismissed. No costs. Sd/- S.R. Nayak chief Justice »;lm>*t.