CW 13835/09 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13835/09 Amir Chand Modi Versus State & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 06/11/2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Dr. Saugath Roy, for petitioner *** Instant petition has been filed by petitioner, who stood retired from service on 31st March, 2002. After his retirement, his pay was re-fixed vide order dt.13th May, 2002 and according to re-fixation of pay, retiral dues were also computed which were paid to him. He never raised objection. However, representation has been placed on record dt.4th December, 2006 after almost 4 yrs. of order impugned herein. Counsel submits that similarly situated persons approached this Court in 2002 itself and writ petitions were decided on 20th November, 2006 and he being similarly situated is entitled for the same relief. In opinion of this Court, submission made is without merit for the reason that those persons who were aggrieved by the decision of the State CW 13835/09 [2] Government, approached this court in the year 2002 itself. Petitioner, who too was served with the order impugned herein dt.13th May, 2002 never assailed the order either before Tribunal or before this Court. Instant petition has been filed after almost 7 yrs. of order impugned and delay in approaching this court is not satisfactory explained and merely because persons similarly situated, as alleged, if granted relief by this court on 20th November, 2006, that will not give right to the petitioner for seeking relief, particularly, when the writ petition itself has been filed after inordinate delay and which is not satisfactory explained. This Court finds no justification to interfere after such inordinate delay U/Art.226 of the Constitution of India. Consequently, instant petition stands dismissed. Counsel submits that he may be permitted to make representation. He is always at liberty to make representation, if advised. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA13835CW09 6-11.doc