CWP No.13911 of 2009.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.13911 of 2009 Date of Decision: 18.02.2010 **** Sukhwinder Singh . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab and others . . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Mohd. Yusuf, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. B.S. Chahal, DAG Punjab ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner claims that he was employed as a Guest Faculty in the Government College, Ropar but has been relieved arbitrarily and someone else has been accommodated in his place. (2). Upon notice of motion, the respondents have stoutly denied the petitioner’s claim as according to them, the petitioner was never employed as Guest Faculty and the Attendance Register relied upon by the petitioner, is a forged one. CWP No.13911 of 2009.doc - 2 – (3). In these circumstances the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Director Public Instructions (Colleges) – the respondent No.2 who, as soon as the representation from the petitioner is received, shall hold a fact-finding enquiry in the matter. In case it is found that the petitioner was employed as Guest Faculty at any point of time, the Policy-decision of the respondents, namely, that “he shall not be replaced by anyone else subject to his fulfilling the eligibility and availability of work” shall be applied in his case also. The needful shall be done as early as possible and preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. (4). Ordered accordingly. (5). Dasti . (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 18.02.2010 vishal shonkar