1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.98/2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4075/2006 (Decided) Jamil Hussain Biabani s/o Mohammed Abid Hussain Biabani ...Versus... Shri R.M. Landge, Executive Director and others -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Petitioner in person] [Smt. B.H. Dangre, Addl. Govt. Pleader for respdt. Nos.2 & 4] CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 31.07.2008 Heard petitioner in person and learned Additional Government Pleader for respondent Nos.2 and 4. For the first time injunction order came to be issued by the District Judge on 4.4.2006 not to make disbursement of payment under land acquisition proceedings and that order came to be confirmed by this Court. It appears that after passing of the order dated 4.4.2006 and confirmed by this Court, all the amounts were deposited in the trial Court. The petitioner has a 2 grievance that the amounts were deposited quite late and, therefore, the concerned officer should be punished. But then the fact remains that there is no evidence to show that there is any breach of the orders of this Court. If at all there is any loss of interest suffered by the petitioner because of late deposit, he is entitled to avail remedy available under law. There is no need to proceed with the contempt petition. Contempt proceedings are dropped. The Contempt Petition is disposed of with liberty to avail appropriate remedy as is available in law. Since the amount is deposited beyond reasonable time, the costs of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand Only) shall be paid to the petitioner by the respondents. JUDGE ssw