IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTYIETH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE P R E S E N T THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU * * * WP.No.21323 OF 2005 Between: K.Gopal Goud & Anr. .… Petitioners Versus The Prohibition & Excise Superintendent, Mahboobnagar district & Anr. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.T.PRASANNA KUMAR (6590) Counsel for the Respondent: GP for Excise O R D E R : This writ petition is filed seeking mandamus to declare the proposed action of the respondents in taking action against the petitioners licence no.82 at counter nos. 1 and 5 at Kollur village of Nawabpet Mandal, Mahbubnagar district is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to take any action against the petitioners licence no.82 at counter nos.1 and 5 at Kollur village of Nawabpet Mandal, Mahbubnagar district. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Govt.Pleader for Excise. Apprehending suspension of licence no.82 at counter nos. 1 and 5 of Kollur village of Nawabpet Mandal, Mahbubnagar district, the petitioners filed the present writ petition. After hearing the learned Govt.Pleader for Excise, it appears that no right of the petitioners is infringed nor any licence is cancelled. The petitioners have filed this writ petition on mere apprehension that the respondents may take action against their licence. However, the respondents are at liberty to take action against the petitioners, in accordance with law, if there is any violation of the conditions of licence. The writ petition is, therefore, premature and the same is accordingly dismissed at the admission stage. No costs. SEPTEMBER 30th, 2005. --------------------- I s L. K. C.. B H A N U , J.