IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.4754 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 24.08.2009 Narinder Sood .....Petitioner versus Sanjay Kumar and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Jaswinder Singh Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner-landlord is aggrieved at the orders dated 20.5.2009 and 10.6.2009, passed by the Rent Controller, Khanna, whereby firstly the respondent-tenants have been permitted to tender the arrears of rent, though they had refused to tender the same on the first effective date of hearing, and thereafter, has further extended the period at the request of the respondent-tenants for the said purpose. According to the petitioner-landlord, once the respondent- tenants have refused to tender the rent, no more opportunity should have been granted to them by the Rent Controller. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the C.R. No.4754 of 2009 (O&M) 2 considered view that no interference in the impugned orders is called for by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction at this stage as the respondent-tenants want to pay the arrears of rent only. However, the petitioner-landlord may accept such arrears without prejudice to their legal rights and can raise the plea at an appropriate stage that belated tendering of rent by the tenants is not in accordance with law. Disposed of accordingly. 24-08-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE