1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. APPEAL AGAINST ORDER NO.86 OF 2007 (VITTHAL DEEWANJI PAWDE Vs SMT. CHHAYA VINODRAO THAKRE & ANR.) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ______________________________________________________________________________________________ CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : JULY 29, 2008. 1. Heard Shri R.D.Bhuibhar, learned counsel for the appellant and Shri Nitin Bargat, learned counsel for respondent No.1. 2. Both the learned counsel agree that injunction was clamped upon the appellant on 21st March, 2007. By an order dated 29th October, 2007 this Court directed the parties to maintain status-quo. There is no complaint that the appellant has breached the injunction.. The status-quo obviously means that the injunction has been respected by the parties. Since this has been so, for almost one year and five months now, no useful purpose would be served by hearing this appeal. Both the parties agree that they would have the trial before the trial 2 Court expeditiously conducted. The appeal is therefore, disposed of with direction to the trial Court to dispose of the suit within a period of nine months. 3. Both the parties agree that they would not seek any adjournment before the trial Judge, unless for compelling reasons, like ill-health or death. JUDGE RR.