1 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.12213/2009. Nazruddin.VS The Rent Tribunal, Jaipur City, Jaipur & Anr. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.12213/2009.\ Nazruddin. VERSUS The Rent Tribunal, Jaipur City, Jaipur and Another. 12.03.2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mrs.Sonia Shandilya, for the petitioner. Mr.M.C.Jain, for the respondent. ***** Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order. This writ petition has been preferred against the impugned order dated 20.05.2009 by which the application submitted under Order 6 Rule 17 C.P.C. by the petitioner was rejected by the learned Tribunal. The petitioner filed the application (Annexure-1) stating therein that in the reply to the application, by mistake in para 7, Section '28' had been erroneously typed whereas it should have been Section '27'. The said application has been rejected by the learned trial court only on the ground that the application has been submitted with delay. I am of the view that so far as the aforesaid prayer of the petitioner for carrying out the amendment/typographical correction in para 7 of the reply is concerned, the same ought to have been allowed as it is a clerical/typographical mistake in 2 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.12213/2009. Nazruddin.VS The Rent Tribunal, Jaipur City, Jaipur & Anr. mentioning of a wrong Section would not cause any prejudice to either of the parties. In the facts and circumstances, the writ petition is allowed and the impugned order disallowing the application (Annexure-1) is set aside. In view of the fact that the case is at the final stage and the parties do not wish to lead any evidence, the learned trial court is directed to proceed with the trial. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.