<^i^ \'ryff7 - -/-~ SiNGLE BENCH IN THE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARHi W.P. (SlNo. 6^?- /2009 & PETITIONER Sushri Thanwarin Kaivart, D/o. Shri Shawal Ram -Kaivart, aged about 58 years, worldng as Upper Division Teacher, Kanya Ashram Jangla, Block 85 Tahsil - Bhairamgarh, Distt. Bijapur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS ^. ?>y^ .••' :v<^^^ ^^^ /••^:"\v-y ^-^^^ yv\y ~\t k _.* ^•^ ^^"/ v^ VERSUS (1) State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralay, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) (2) The Director, Directorate ofC.G. Public Education Department, Raipur (C.G.) (3) The District Education Officer, Office of District Education Officer, Bijapur, Distt. Bijapur(C.G.j (4) The Commissioner, Tribal Development, Raipur (C.G.) (5) Mata Rukamani Sewa Sansthan Samiti, thr. Its Secretaiy, Mata Rukamani Sewa Sansthan Samiti, Dimrapal, Tahsil 85 Distt. Jagdalpur (C.O.) . WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The Petitioner named above most respectfully submitted'as under: - IH'::;I'U itl:'^ 1. P-ARTICULAR OF THE PETITIONERS As shown in the cause title. !;!f:;>:!,.i ^ SJ^^^i Annt HIGHCOlIRT<?E^HHATTI§^^RaATSILASPUR WRTT PETmON fS) No. 6487 of2009 PETmONER RESPONDENTS : Sushri Thanwari&Kaivart. VERSUS ' ;:-••;:.., .,„ •• :Stateofehhattisgarit&G8hfirs; WRn'I>ETJTIQNlJNDERAIfT{CLE226C>FTHEC(WSITrLrTKWOF^I^ ,.,,.,,..:.,,....•-,-..,,.,..^;g^ Pr^etrt:Shriymod^[?eslunufch,AdvQcate^^ ' Slm P.K-Bhaduil^PaB^ Lawyw^^ State^spondeuts l^to 4 r :.:-.:.;'..OR]DEaa.«ntAiA. -. .-•: ' •^ : • (Passed on 10" day of Novembei, 2QQ9) HeaTdleamedcounselfortheparties. r 1. Leamedcounsel appearmg for the petitionersutoutsthatthemrtantpe'titiwiis squaiely covered by the^decisioit ofthis Court rendeTed in Smt. A.Lalt v.State ofChhattisgarh i& 0<fter^,thusthepetitiQnermaybepamited^^ a represeiitation to decide her case in Ihe lig}it ofaforestated deeision, •SBb)ect to veriBcaticn asto whether the respondent No. 5-Institute is a Govemment Aided school and tfae petitioner is ateacherwiffiin the sanetioned.sto'ength. r • • ' 2. Leamedcounsel aRpearing fbr the State/req>ondents 1 to 4 sutnmts tHatin the event, the petitioner make a representation, the samerwill be considered and decided, ia accordanee with law, within a period offourwesksftomthedate;of receipt offhe representation. 3. In view of fQregoing, according to tfae leamed eoiuMel ajyearing fw the ^^ . " "'•'.' ' . •••;" '•.'••"• ;-' •:••-.'•'•• ."• ' • •.',,.'•• ••• "- •-'•••••- petitionCTs, notiung survivesin this petitionfer adjudieation. " • 4 Accofdmgly, the writ pefitimi iftdisposed of ^f^wt" So^^A8e \/. '; \.. 20Q7(I).BIJ2g3: