IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 186 OF 2006 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 49 OF 2006 SURESH S.SANCOALKAR AND 14 ORS. ... Applicants Versus SHRI DILIPHARICHANDRA PARSENKAR AND 43 ORS. ... Respondents Mr. S.D. Lotlikar, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. Amol Naik, Advocate for the Respondents no.17 to 22. Coram:- R. C. CHAVAN, J. Date:- 22nd August, 2008 P.C. While admitting this appeal though an order "no interim relief was passed." On the same day, on this application "Rule on Interim relief returnable on 17.4.2008" was ordered. Therefore this application is requried to be decided. By this application the appellant seeks an injunction to restrain the respondents from plucking coconuts from trees situated in the suit property and carrying out construction in the suit property. As far as plucking of the coconuts from the coconut trees is concerned, the applicant could claim damages that may be caused to him. As far as the construction is concerned it would be sufficient to observe that if the respondent undertakes construction during the pendency of the appeal such construction would be subject to decision of the appeal and no equities could be claimed. The application is disposed off accordingly. R. C. CHAVAN, J. cg