€^ %ss. '""fS'- ^^ ^ XI-HG—78 & S^l W W\4> 'aqi sn^i siiiiqi 'S^l -41<41d'LI, enly'ie, l<)c'ii'Ml< tlTHdl (b*11<*> ••^200 SfI^I ipR7 (1P^q^) TOiTW^ritasn^' W. P.($l No. 694/2009 PBTITIONER posted qOTferah imaf 4 fei^t TfSre^R •iR affin an^il Sint. ^hanti Satapathy, D/o Late Shri Balram Mishra|, ag,ed about 57 years, Assistaat Teacher, at Govt. Middle School, Rajeev Gandlu Nagar, (Tahsil & District Raigarh (CG) ''ersus 1. State <|>f CIihattisgarh, fhrough Secretary, Educati^n Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2, DirectorJ (CG) o. District PubUc Instruction Department, Raipur Education Officer, Raigarh, District- tCG} 4. Dy. Dare(;tor Education Raigarh, District-Raigarh fCG) 5. Block E^ucation Officer, Raigarh, Distt.Raigarli (CG) WritJ'etitlon under Artic|e 226 ofthe Coastitution of tmSia. SB:HON._SHm^HIRENDRA,J|IISHRA,_J, Shri R.S. Patel, counsel f|>r the petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Adfocate General for the State. ]he instaat petition for direction to fhe The petitioner has filed respondeuts to consider fhe ca^e of the petitioner for promotion to fhe post of Upper Division Teache^ in Scieace subject as per Circtdar ot' Aanexure P-3 dated 20. l. 1987. | Learaed counsel for the Tiletitioncr subinits faat this petition mav '< z ~ ~~~~ —^-' be disposed ofwifh. Uberty to flie petitiouer to ffle fi-esh.Fe.presen.taaon. ss-asaas;, ^•iiS8> •^ ^"-i&a.. k-^Si^, 1 ^3s'ss?i'":<;i n lu3Si5-- y ^ ^'v^''' /f ^•^ .'ss^'' XI-HG—78 Sf^V 'W 1<-1 '^T^T 3T1^T <at^icti $ 's^ "ii<4id'M, ®ifl'y'i<o,Tsiyiyy *ll*i^ti tb*iidi "^I, 200 3TI^I'CR?T (licl'd'!l<t() wiiw ^rfCT ai^'1 •2 before fhe respondent No. 1 fo^ in tum, tnay be ftuther directe|d light ofCircular ofAnnexure P| On the otb.er hand, leanlied case the petitioner files fi-es^. No. 1 for l-edressal of his abovd an,d decided by the respondenl In view of fhe atiove parties, the iustaat petition is| to file fresh representation be^ Iris grievaaces, raised in fbis| aiade, the respondent No. 1 expeditiously, in accoidance shi<<I<n<<1-^ "RTR^ff ^f 'fe^t •t.Pn'^K iTaifinsn^r icdressal of his above grievances, who, to consider aad decide fhe same in fhe f-3. counsel for fhe State subxnits that in |i representation before the respondent grievauce, the same shaU be cousidered No.l expeditiously. iubmission of leamed counsel for fhe |disposed ofwith liberty to fhe petitioner pire the respoadent No. 1 for redrcssal of petition. On such representation being shall conskler aad decide the sanie law. -:. .,, v.'~;- •ntith Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge l^