ur V sin1* IN THE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION No. 403-7 /2004 PETITIONER Mahavir Prasad Mishra, S/o Shri Shivpati Prasad Mishra, Aged about 34 years, Occupation Service Constable B. No. 783, Presently Posted at Rakshit Kendra Durg (C.G.) VERSUS^- RESPQNDENT ...<: ^^ c^%^'"..---' ^""B-y^""' ^^yy'"" i ^r--A-';" 2. 3. 4. 5. u^" Union of India, Through The Secretaiy, Department of Personal, F'ublic grievance and pension, Third floor, Loknaik Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi. State ofMadhya Pradesh, Through the Secretary, Department of Home affairs, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (MP). State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Honae affairs, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG.). Director General of Police, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.). Inspector General of Police, (Personal), Police Head Quarter, Raipur (C.G.). a \M iNiw':: ft w",. fl ^' J^! //! 6. Superintendent of Police, District Durg JS.A5C WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLB^227 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOF INDIA /~i,^ XI-HC—78 sn^v w f<;"<i<* ?ii an^; gnw Khan l^ Ec" wwfrw*(ra» 's'^ "^i^K'i'a, ®Ti]*<'ii<c,Rwiyy . p^. ^o^-^ •^2009 3(I^?[ 'q^q? ( yil^'t't.^) ¥H!IW'afro sn^i 18-11-2004 Shri Sunil Sahu, Couiisel fo Shri R.S. Baghel, Addl. Sl respondentNo.l. Shri Yashwant Singh, Goyt r.espondents No.3, 4, 5 and 6. None for respondent N0.2. Application for .urgent heari Heard. Counsel for the petitioner W.P. No. 57S/04(BaleitdraSekh, <6 Others\ orders have been pas^ passed in this case also. Praver is not opposed by the^ Having considered the fact^ on record and m view of fhe jud| position, the action ofthe State .^ cannof be sustained and the petitioi Accordmgly,the petition is| relieve the petitioner within 15 daj this order. Consequently, M.W.P, No. Certified copy as per rules. chl<li<ri41't TRPRfff ^f ts^ <f^[^t'' ^?3ifitT3II^[ " the petitioner. fcnding Counsel for the Union of Indiaf' Advocate forfhe State ofChhattisgarh/' [igisallowed. lubmitted that in similar matter bearing v Mishra & Others Vs. Union oflndia (ed. He prays that similar order may be 1 ofher side. and circumstances ofthe case, material jud^ment cited above and farther the legal ^uthorities in not relieving the petitioner ler is entitled forrelieving. |allowed. The respondents are directedto 1's fromfh.e date ofproduction ofcopy of ^435/2004 also stands disposed of sd/- Fakhruddin Judye i-axtf>'