IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5984 of 2010 RAMPUKAR SINGH, SON OF GANESHI SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-BANGALIA, P.S. MANSI, DISTRICT-KHAGARIA……………………PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………………..OPPOSITE PARTY. --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Senior Advocate. For the State : Mr. U.S.P. Singh, A.P.P. -------- 3. 22.4.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the F.I.R. has been lodged against unknown persons. There is no recovery of any incriminating articles from the possession of the petitioner. It has also been submitted that though the informant claims to have identified the culprits, the petitioner has not been put to any T.I. Parade, though he is in custody since 2.12.2009. Learned counsel also submits that two persons have named the petitioner in paragraphs 100 and 101 of the case diary. It is also contended that the - 2 - uncle of one of the witnesses had earlier lodged a First Information Report against the petitioner, a copy of which is appended as Annexure-‘2’ to the application whereas the petitioner has lodged F.I.R. against the brothers of the other witness, a copy of which is appended as Annexure-‘3’ to the application. In that background, it is stated that no emphasis or importance could be given to such alleged statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner is not involved in any criminal case except one Chautham P.S. Case No.51 of 2002. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Rampukar Singh, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Railway Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria, District-Khagaria, in connection with Khagaria Rail P.S. (Mansi) Case No.60/09, G.R. No.(R) 110/09, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be the close relative or his family member, who will file affidavit before the court below giving full genealogy showing his or her relationship with the petitioner. Further, - 3 - after his release in this case, if the petitioner is again found to be involved in criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Further, the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial in the court below. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of the trial in the court below without any reasonable cause being shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)