WPMS 1832/2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Piyush Garg, Advocate for the petitioners, Sri Rakesh Thapliyal, Advocate for the respondent no. 7 and Sri Sudhir Singh, Advocate for the respondent no. 8. The application of the plaintiff under Order 1 Rule 8 of the C.P.C. praying that the suit be tried in a representative capacity, was allowed by the trial court, against which, the contesting defendants have filed the present writ petition. In my opinion, the writ petition is not maintainable against an interlocutory order. Even otherwise, the Court does not find any palpable error to interfere in a writ jurisdiction. The writ petition is dismissed. It would, however, be open to the contesting defendants to file impleadment application to implead other defendants who have an interest in the matter in suit. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) 26-10-2010 SP