-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 8 OF 2007 M/s.Ameya Developers Pvt.Ltd... ... Applicant. Versus Union of India & Another. .... Respondents. Mr.V.R.Hukmani for the Applicant. Mr. T.J.Pandian for the Respondents. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. DATED : 22ND JUNE, 2007. DATED : 22ND JUNE, 2007. DATED : 22ND JUNE, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: Learned Counsel appearing for the applicant submits that in view of the judgment of this Court in Arbitration Application No. 238 of 2005 (M/s.Narmada Arbitration Application No. 238 of 2005 (M/s.Narmada Arbitration Application No. 238 of 2005 (M/s.Narmada Macadam Pvt. Ltd. v/s Union of India) Macadam Pvt. Ltd. v/s Union of India) Macadam Pvt. Ltd. v/s Union of India) dated 8th September, 2006, the applicant will move the respondent Authority for appointment of an Arbitrator limiting to its claim in terms of the above referred judgment. reducing their claim to 20% and that the amount of penalty may also be referred to arbitration. If, such a request is made, the respondents to consider the same in accordance with law. Learned Counsel for the respondents has no objection. -: 2 :- 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of in the above terms. Both parties will abide by their statement. 3. However, parties are left to bear their own costs. Sd/- CHIEF JUSTICE CHIEF JUSTICE CHIEF JUSTICE