IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 522 OF 2008 SHRI. DURGA BHICU NADKARNI AND 3 ORS., ... Petitioners Versus THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER DIV-VI (ROADS-SOUTH) AND 5 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. S. S.Kakodkar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Mr. A. Kamat, Addl. Government Advocate for the Respondents. Coram:- A. P. DESHPANDE & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 10th November, 2008 P.C. The learned Advocate General for the Respondents, in all fairness, submits that the notice dated 20.12.07 issued by the Advocate for the Petitioners will be treated as a representation in the matter of request for acquisition of the land covered by a road and a decision in that regard would be taken within a period of two months from today. 2. The learned Counsel for the Petitioners does not have any objection to this course being followed. 3. In the result, the Writ Petition stands disposed off with a direction to the Respondents to treat the notice dated 20.12.07 as a representation made by the Petitioners in relation to the acquisition of land and shall take a decision within a period of two months from today. Needless to mention, that the decision so taken shall be communicated to the Petitioners. This Order is without prejudice to the rights of the Petitioners and with liberty to the Petitioners to challenge the Order passed on the said representation by the Respondents, if the same goes against the Petitioners. A. P. DESHPANDE, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. arp/*