HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 18th April, 2006 Bail Application No. 299 of 2006 Order on the bail application of the accused CRIMINAL SIDE Sahanazar S/o Gayyur Ahmad R/o Village Sartheri, Police Station – Bhagwanpur District – Haridwar …Applicant Versus State of Uttaranchal … Opposite Party _____________________________________________________________ In Case Crime No. 69 of 2006 U/s 394, 411 I.P.C. Police Station - Manglaur District – Haridwar Hon’ble J. C. S. Rawat, J. Heard Sri Rajendra Singh-learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. It was contended on behalf of the learned counsel for the applicant that none had been nominated in the F.I.R. and the said offence was committed on 04.03.2006. It was further contended that a sum of Rs. 2,035/- was recovered from the possession of the applicant and it is also stated that the said recovery was made on the next date and at that time the complainant was present alongwith the police party. It was further contended that the presence of the complainant is not believable. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case in totality, it is a fit case for bail at this stage. Let the accused-applicant, Sahanazar be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of J.M., Roorkee. Dated 18.04.2006 (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Shiv