IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellanious No.44729 of 2010 Jitendra Kumar Thakur @ Golu @ Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Thakur @ Golu Thakur…………………………………………………….Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 06. 04.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. There is no eye witness of the occurrence rather F.I.R. is to the effect that petitioner along with others came to informant brother in-law’s house who accompanied them for joining ‘Tilak Ceremony’ and did not return. They took his brother in-law to the house of this petitioner and assaulted him brutally, later on dead body was found. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that deceased himself was of criminal antecedent, might have been killed for his own act otherwise informant’s sister, who told (inform) about taking of the deceased by this petitioner and others is not examined in the case. One of the witnesses namely Raj Kumar Mahto in Paragraph-9 of the case diary states about accompanying of the deceased with petitioner and others, but on 21.6.2010 instead of 20.6.2010. Post mortem report shown multiple injuries of hard and blunt substance and petitioner remained in custody since 21.6.2010. Accordingly, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to 2 the satisfaction of the 7th Addl. Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur in connection with Session Trial No.641 of 2010 arising out of Kanti (Panapur O.P.)P. S. Case No.173 of 2010. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)