IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION. AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION. AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION. SUIT No.50 OF 1989. IN PETITION No. 39 of 1989 IN PETITION No. 595 of 1989 IN PETITION No.651 of 1989 Kantilal khimji & Anr ..Plaintiffs. Vs. Pravin Kumar khimji. .. Defendant. Respondent. Mr Palan i/b. S.M. Kazi, Advocate for the plaintiffs. Ms R.C. Nichani, Advocate for the Defendant. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V. C. DAGA, J. V. C. DAGA, J. V. C. DAGA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 07. 01. 2008. 07. 01. 2008. 07. 01. 2008. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. On the motion made by learned counsel for the plaintiff-petitioner, he is allowed to withdraw the suit. The suit is dismissed as withdrawn. 2. Needless to mention that the plaintiff-petitioner would be entitled to claim court fee as per rules. 3. No order as to costs. (V.C. (V.C. (V.C. DAGA,J) DAGA,J) DAGA,J)