IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1517 of 2009 SARITA KUMARI W/O SHRI SATENDRA KUMAR R/O VILL.- AJDA, P.S.- PALIGANJ, DISTT.- PATNA. -------- Petitioner/Appellant Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/COLLECTOR, PATNA. 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, PATNA. 4. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, DISTRICT INDUSTRY CENTRE, PATNA. 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, PALIGANJ, PATNA. 6. THE MUKHIYA (PANCHAYAT RAJ AJDA) SIKKARIA, P.S.- PALIGANJ, PATNA. 7. THE HEAD MASTER, PRIMARY SCHOOL, VILL.- AJDA, P.S.- PALIGANJ, DISTT.- PATNA. 8. RAMASHANKAR KUMAR (SHIKSHA-MITRA) AJDA PRIMARY SCHOOL, VILL.- AJDA, (P.S.- PALIGANJ), DISTT.- PATNA. ------------- Respondents/Respondents ----------- 3 19.01.2011 Heard. With regard to the assertion made by the appellant herein that no notice was issued to him before cancelling his appointment as Panchayat Shiksha Mitra, we find that the observation of the learned single Judge is that both the parties have been heard by the concerned authority and accordingly the order of the learned single Judge is upheld. We are also of the opinion that the appellant had been heard and as such there was no necessity for issuance of a separate notice to the appellant. The action of the respondent in passing the order of cancellation of appointment of the appellant 2 cannot be termed in violation of the principles of natural justice. We are also of the view that the learned single Judge is perfectly correct in holding that the appellant writ petitioner would still be entitled for payment of salary for the period she worked i.e. from 1.7.2006 to 20.7.2009 and, accordingly, we also confirm the said finding of the learned single Judge. With the aforementioned observation, this appeal is disposed of. Rishi/Kanchan (T. Meena Kumari, J.) (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)