THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.4087 OF 2011 ORDER: The petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.23 of 2006 on the file of the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Prathipadu, East Godavari District. The suit for injunction in respect of agricultural property. He filed an interlocutory application for injunction. It was dismissed. He then filed C.M.A.No.4 of 2006. The Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Peddapuram, allowed it and granted injunction, which was the subject matter of C.R.P.No.5555 of 2010. By an order, dated 18.04.2011, this Court dismissed the C.R.P. confirming the injunction granted by the lower appellate Court. This Court also observed that the suit be disposed of within a period of six months. At that stage, defendants 2 and 3 in the petitioner’s suit, who had filed O.S.No.38 of 2007, approached the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Prathipadu. In their application being I.A.No.414 of 2011, they prayed to club O.S.No.38 of 2007 with O.S.No.23 of 2006. The application having been allowed, the petitioner filed the instant Civil Revision Petition. Counsel for the petitioner submits that his client is not a party to O.S.No.38 of 2007. Therefore, the question of clubbing of both the suits does not arise. This Court is afraid the submission is misconceived. There is no dispute that the suit schedule property in both the suits is the same. There is also no dispute that the petitioner already obtained ad interim injunction. If the common trial is not conducted, as observed by the trial Court, there would be likelihood of conflict in decisions and might give raise to multiplicity of proceedings. The trial Court exercised sound discretion while passing the order impugned and hence, no interference is called for. The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 14th October 2011 RRB