IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 3RD NOVEMBER 2009 / 12TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 29275 of 2009(D) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- THE MANAGER, DARUSSALAM.L.P SCHOOL, THRIKKAKARA, KOCHI-21. BY ADVS.MR.P.K.IBRAHIM MR.C.N.GOPAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT ANNEX TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ALUVA ERNAKULAM DIST. 3. A.M.RAMLATH, W/O. JAMALUDHEEN HEADMISTRESS DARUSSALAM.L.P SCHOOL, THRIKKAKAR, RESIDING AT 'THEJUS', SHOBA THEATRE ROAD TOLL JUNCTION, P.O.EDAPPALLY, KOCHI-24. 4. MR. JAMALUDHEEN, 'THEJUS' SHOBA THEATRE ROAD, TOLL JUNCTION, P.O.EDAPPALLY KOCHI-24. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.V.T.K.MOHANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.29275/2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE REPORT DTD. 11.8.09 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT . P2:- COPY OF THE REQUEST DTD. 17.9.09 OF THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P3:- COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS NO.C/3587/09 DTD. 30.9.09 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P4:- COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B1/20159/08 DTD. 15.11.08 OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION , ERNAKULAM. P5:- COPY OF THE ENQUIRY REPORT DTD. 4.5.09 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P6:- COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B1/20159/08 DTD. 8.4.09 OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, ERNAKULAM. P7:- COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B1/20159/08 DTD. 5.5.09 OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, ERNAKULAM. P8(a):- COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION DTD. 9.10.09 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT. P8(b):- COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DTD. 9.10.09 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT. TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.29275/2009-D ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 3rd day of November, 2009 J U D G M E N T Heard. 2. The main prayer in the writ petition is to quash Ext.P3 order passed by the Assistant Educational Officer, Aluva whereby sanction to extend the suspension beyond 15 days was denied. It is also pointed out that the matter has been taken up in revision by Ext.P8(a). The learned counsel for the petitioner prayed for a direction to the Government to consider and pass orders on Ext.P8(a). 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.3 and 4 that the third respondent also may be heard by the Government before any decision is taken on Ext.P8(a). It is also submitted that the fourth respondent is not a necessary party in these proceedings. 4. There will be a direction to the first respondent to take a decision on Ext.P8(a) after hearing the petitioner and other necessary parties including the third respondent within a period of two months from the date of production of a copy of this Judgment. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms