IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1441 of 2009 Jangbahadur Yadav ……… Petitioner. Versus 1.State Of Bihar. 2.Satyadeo Yadav S/o Gobardhan Yadav. 3.Gobardhan Yadav S/o Madhav Yadav. 4.Balister Yadav S/o Late Sukhadi Yadav. 5.Uma Yadav S/o Balister Yadav. 6.Ambika Yadav S/o Late Dilli Yadav. All residents of Mohalla- Basant Tola,P.S.Bettiah Mufassil, District- West Champaran. ….O.Ps. ---------------------------------- For the petitioner: Mr.Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate. For the State : Dr.Rabindra Kumar, A.P.P. 2 24.10.2011 The informant is the petitioner who has preferred this revision application against the Judgment and order dated 21.7.2009 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, West Champaran, Bettiah in Sessions Trial No.56 of 2000 arising out of Bettiah Mufassil P.S. Case No.87 of 1995 by which accused opposite parties no.2 to 6 have been sentenced only under sections 147 and 323 of I.P.C. and they have been acquitted under sections 307,341,324 and 325 I.P.C. Prosecution case is that on 13th July, 1995 the accused including the O.Ps. No.2 to 6 made unlawful assembly armed with deadly weapons and assaulted the informant with intention to kill him. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. On perusal of the impugned order it appears that the learned Additional Sessions Judge has considered the evidence adduced on behalf of the prosecution and has come to the conclusion that the doctor and the I.O. have not been examined. The injury report is also not on the record. The informant, P.W.4 has stated that the accused persons were armed with Bhala and other weapons but they assaulted 2 him with danda only. He has also stated that the accused, Bhikhari Sah was not in the occurrence and the police has wrongly made him accused and after considering all the materials the learned trial court has found the accused opposite parties guilty under sections 147 and 323 of I.P.C. Since they were the first offenders they have been released on furnishing personal bond of Rs.2000/- for maintaining peace for one year. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case as stated above I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This revision petition is dismissed. AnilKrSinha (Amaresh Kumar Lal,J.)