IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 8TH PHALGUNA 1929 Crl.MC.No. 3047 of 2007 ------------------------- CC.553/2005 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-i,CHERTHALA .................... PETITIONER: ------------ V.A.SHALLOM, PROPRIETOR, M/S.ARAVIND AQUA TECH, DOOR NO.PP9/166A, VETTACKAL, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA-688 587. BY ADV. SRI.K.SURENDRA MOHAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. P.MOHAN, DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS, T.C.14/1421, UNIVERSITY P.O., PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SMT.A.SREEKALA BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR. M.S. BREEZE THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Crl.M.C.No. 3047 of 2007 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 27th day of February, 2008 ORDER The petitioner, who is the accused in C.C.No.553/2005 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Cherthala for an offence punishable under Section 33 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for the alleged contravention of Sections 11(1) and 12(b) of the Act, seeks to quash Annexure A-13 complaint and all further proceedings before the Magistrate. It is too early to consider the contentions of the petitioner on the merits. The cognizance was taken way back in the year 2005 and it is admitted that the trial court has also framed charge against the petitioner. Hence, now the only course available to the petitioner is to stand trial and try to get an acquittal. The documents produced by the petitioner which do not form part of the prosecution records can be pressed into service only at the appropriate stage of trial. Hence, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to raise all contentions available to him in law, this Crl.M.C.is dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE ks.