IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 29.07.2010 COCP No.636 of 2010 Sucha Singh ...Petitioner Versus Shri J.S.Ahlawat, D.C., Karnal and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Shri Vikas Lochab, Advocate, for Shri Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Aman Chaudhary, Addl. AG, Haryana, for respondent No.1. Mr. Sumit Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.2. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) The representation of the petitioner was for purchase of land, which was directed to be decided by the Deputy Commissioner. In reply, it has been pointed out that the Gram Panchayat has not passed any resolution for sale of land. In view of the said fact, the Deputy Commissioner cannot consider the claim of the petitioner for purchase of land. Consequently, no further orders are called for in the present contempt petition. The same is dismissed. Rule discharged. 29.07.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE C.R.No. 498 of 1995 2