IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9853 of 1997 RAMAGAR CHOUDHARY, S/O SRI DEONANDAN CHOUDHARY, R/O TEYAI POST OFFICE DADPUR VIA TEGHRA, DISTRICT BEGUSARAI AT PRESENT POSTED AS ASSISTANT TEACHER IN THE GOVERNMENT BASIC SCHOOL, BINDPUR, BEGUSARAI. ……………………….PETITIONER. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2.THE COMMISSIONER CUM SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIATE, PATNA. 3.THE SPECIAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR,PATNA. 4.THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 5.THE SPECIAL DIRECTOR PRIMARY EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 6.THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, DARBHANGA DIVISION, DARBHANGA. 7.THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, BEGUSARAI. 8.THE HEADMASTER, GOVERNMENT BASIC SCHOOL ULAO, DISTRICT BEGUSARAI. …………………………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 06/ 12.07.2011 No one appears for the petitioner. The main grievance of the petitioner as with regard to his reappointment in service having been redressed by the Authority by impugned order dated 29.08.1996, the respondents now cannot be compelled to also give the continuity of service and/or pay protection, inasmuch as, the finding of the Authority in the order dated 29.08.1996 is quite clear that the position of the petitioner at serial no. 237 in 2 the panel on the basis of marks and the date of birth was justified. Apparently, if the petitioner had been directed to be appointed afresh by the order dated 29.08.1996, after his earlier termination on 06.12.1993 which order has not been interfered both either by this Court or by the Authority, there would be no question of the petitioner for being entitled either for arrears of salary or for giving him continuity of service from 15.02.1990. Consequently this Court would not find any merit in the application and the same is, accordingly, dismissed. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J)