G, r* Y INTHEHIGHCQURTOFJUDICATUREATBILASPUR: CHMATTISGARH W.P. N0. 6>^^ OF2006 Petitioner ^ ^ \^ .-^y. \<^ .•"<^/" ^^^- ^-'^••••" 7^>"" State of Chhattisgarh through the Divisional ForestOfficer, South Surguja Forest Division, Ambikapur, Distt.Surguja (Chhattisgarh) ^ Respohdents Versus <" "^" 1. Goverdhan Mishra S/o Awdhesh Mishra R/Q Rratappur Naka; Post Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja {Chhattisgarh) 2. Presiding Officer, LabourGourt, Ambikapur Distt. Surguja WRITPETITtONUNDERABTIGLE 226^27 OFTHE <;QNSTITU?n£)iN!@BylNE)IA 3II^?[ W Ri-li+ ^STT ^7T^?T ^H r^1' 75? '^TPWPI, 'wTRTTiS, T^iRTy ^'..•s.^^1.^.. 3I!t?I'q?^ (i^i^titt) '^BTWdfeSlT^I SB ; HON'BLE MR. 3USTICE PRTTINKER DIWAKER 07.09.2011 Di^ Shri Pravin Das, Shri V. K. Pandey, The present petiti against the impugned annexure P-l passed Court, Ambikapur, Act/2002(Ref) whereby for reinstatement of Securlty Guard without Leamed counse) submits that subseque^t 10.09.2008 respondei|it appointed as Forest Annexure R-l. On instructions, No.l submits that daim for back wages in •^rafera^i •'mai •?feet ^R?re •^affinan^ ', G.A. forthe State/petitioner. counsel for respondent No.l. i|on has been filed by the State laward dated 26.05.2005 vide b(/ the Presiding Offlcer, Labour, Dist^ict Surguja in case No. 96./ID the Labour Court has directed r^spondent No.l on the post of |3ack wages. ^ppearing for respondent No.l to filing of thls petition, on No.l has already been 6|jard on regular pay scale vide leamed counsel for respondent resftondent No.l witl not have any Ifuture also. T XI-HC—78 's^ ^TRRPT, •wft»m<?,fsrai^ t-J.f. fczy'/''16 ss^ Tf^: ("^f^sq) SD^iqff R;-|i4i Wtt STR^T S|)*l|tft "•. k. TOnw^iftg 3n^?i In view of above, e|i parties, nothlng sunitives adjudlcatlon. Thus, the of. 'VRfepfrf'WRTf'? feA •^aifan3^ ccording to the counsel for the in thls petitlon for petltion is accordingly dtsposed Sdf- Pritinker Diwaker Judge