II THE COURT OF JUDACATURE AT MLASPUR W.P.NO. Z^65 / 2004 Petltioner Prgduman Singti Armo S/o Bsldau Singh Armo, Aged §bout 26 years, R/o P.S.Thane Road Ratanpur, Dist : Bilaspur-(C.G.) Vt.r§?iis Re.§p@sidesit§ ^? y Sfate of Chhattisgarh Through the . •• \ i CSLF o .^ ^^.^+^ ^,, /^ Bhawan, Raipur, ,^^:" Y^A ^.,^S- VA-' 1-.^< The Director Pubiic Instmction, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur-(C.G.) 3. Th®District Education Officer, Bi!aspar.(C.G.) 4. Janpad Paiichayaf Kota, Through its Chief ExeciitiYe, Janpad Pancliayat, Kota.fC.G.) 5. The UniD!I of Iiidia Throiigh Secretar)? Minist!y ofPersomiei %sid Public Grievances, New Dethi ^•n.}- ''//,. ^klT PETITION ITNDER ARTJCLE 226 / 227 OF THE I-;-.»-^'t^ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA . -^y r^w^-* -• ••••'" , ^ _.,..__._._.____..--._._.-_-— IJS _^'- ^ ^.- €.%..^ ^X&f^ ^i^-i^,' ^o^ "^^ ^ ^ '-^ -<- ^-' n ^' ^^ Ll 1 il ; ,1;tii ^ ®Itt XI-HC-22 -y^ ^iAjH'y, ^T^^re, fsr^ray 3TT^T 1^^ u -'f- ^o. ^6r/£?c, ^T^TT^RI^ 'fN^y" <HF^[^T ^-ii<^ 5-Ti^¥? ^Tf^^rf^r 1 Ir- ^.^ ^ 3TI^T ^"RH^T'Hf^T 21-12-2005 Petitioner by &hri ICM. ^KI^ Shri Vivek Sharma, Panel Lawyerj ^ou^v^, Advocate. ifortheState. passed by this Court on 20/12/2005. He- also. Learned counse! for the State doe; ^N^T7TH ^T^ Tf fe^ Tr^TFZT? ^ OT^R 3:{T^?T Heard. This case relates to compassion^te appointment consequent upon the deathof an employee sen/ing in the State. categorically stated that in this case, the death of fl 1 -1997 and not earlier. It is further submitted that Learned counse! for the petitionei{ the employee has occurred on orafter 1-f in batch of cases bearing W.P. No. 1322/^002 involving the same question orders have been brays that similar orders may be passed in this case 5 not dispute the above fact and state that the State { of Chhattisgarh has taken a decisionjto consider the cases of dependants of those emptoyees who died on or after 1/11/19^7 strictly in accordance with the policy prevalent at that time. In view of the submissions mac)e by learned counsel appearing for the parties, without expressing any opinion on the m^rits of the case, in the opinion ofthis Court, ends of justice witl be served if a direction is giv^n to the State of Chhattisgarh and the authorities concerned to consider and decide the cjase of the petitioner in accordance with the policy prevalent at the time of death of the enn|ployee concerned. tf the petitioner found eligible, appointment orders will be issued as eajrty as possibte on or before 30 Aprit, 2006. The petitioner is also directed to render due c 3-0peration to the authorities. It is made clear that if any gnevance still remains, the petitiorjer may avail the remedy avaitable under the law including filing ofthe petition-before this 4;ourt. With the aforesaid obse^ations, th'is petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. Copy to the State counsel, who) will be obliged to communicate the order to the respondents for compliance. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ^ TU ^l<y°l