IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO. 369 OF 2007. APPEAL NO. 369 OF 2007. APPEAL NO. 369 OF 2007. Irfan Rizwan Ahmed Ansari and ors. ... Appellants. Versus. Jamat-Ul-Muslemin Trust & others. ... Respondents. Shri J.A.Khan for the Appellant. Shri P.O.Verghese i/by K.Balkrishnan for the Respondents Nos.2 to 8. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 12th February, 2007. : 12th February, 2007. : 12th February, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Appellant and the Advocate for the Respondents Nos.2 to 8. This Appeal takes exception to an order passed by the District Court on an application under section 72 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950. In view of the decision of a Division Bench of this Court, this Appeal will lie only on substantial questions of law. 2. The order impugned is an order of remand. The order of remand has been passed on 19th April 2002. The learned Advocate for the 2nd to 8th Respondent states that on the basis of the order of remand, the parties have led evidence in the enquiry applications and now the applications are kept for final argument. As the order of remand has already been acted upon, no interference is called for. No substantial questions of law arises in the First Appeal. The First Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Judge. Judge. Judge.