1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:05.04.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.(MD)No.5268 of 2011 Yogeshwari, rep.by her mother Indira Gandhi, W/O.Panneer Selvam Plot No.130, 8th Cross Street, Arulananthammal Nagar Thanjavur-7. ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director of Medical Education, E.V.R.Periyar High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010. 2.The Selection Committee Medical Education, Directorate of Medical Education, E.V.R.Periyar High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010. 3.The Director of Government Examination, Chennai-600 006. 4.The Secretary, State Board of School Examination, (Higher Secondary) Tamil Nadu, Department of Government Examination, Chennai-600 006. 5.The Joint Director (Revaluation), The Directorate of Government Examination, Chennai-600 006. ...Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 11.04.2011 and pass order before commencement of the selection process for medical education to the academic year 2011-2012. For Petitioners : Mr.T.A.Ebenezer For Respondents : Mr.N.Illango, Govt.Advocate ORDER Mr.N.Illango, learned Government Advocate takes notice of the respondents 1 to 5. By consent, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 2. The Writ Petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to direct the respondents herein to consider the representation dated 11.04.2011. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 spite of a representation given on 11.04.2011 to the respondents by the petitioner, the respondents have not considered the said representation. Hence, the present Writ Petition. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that since the respondents failed to consider the representation dated 11.04.2011, the petitioner is put to lot of hardships and therefore, he prays this Court that the representation preferred by the petitioner may be directed to be considered. 4. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate, I deem it appropriate to direct the concerned respondents to consider the representation dated 11.04.2011. Accordingly, I direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 11.04.2011 on merits and in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Sd/ Assistant Registrar(Crl.Side) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Director of Medical Education, E.V.R.Periyar High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010. 2.The Selection Committee Medical Education, Directorate of Medical Education, E.V.R.Periyar High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010. 3.The Director of Government Examination, Chennai-600 006. 4.The Secretary, State Board of School Examination, (Higher Secondary) Tamil Nadu, Department of Government Examination, Chennai-600 006. 5.The Joint Director (Revaluation), The Directorate of Government Examination, Chennai-600 006. +1cc to Mr.T.A.E Advocate, Sr.No.16485 +one cc to Special Government Pleader, Sr.No. 16498 W.P.(MD)No.5268 of 2011 04.05.2011 ssm/SMA/10.05.2011/8C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/