IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. L.P.A. No.617 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 12.5.2010 Sukhbir Singh. -----Appellant Vs. State of Haryana & others. -----Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present:- Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the appellant. --- ORDER: 1. This appeal has been preferred against order of learned Single Judge, holding that value of the land allotted to the brothers in partition was almost equal and no interference was called for with the order of partition, as affirmed by higher revenue authorities. 2. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant. 3. Contention on behalf of the appellant is that the value of land allotted to the appellant is less than the value of land allotted to the respondents. It is further pointed out that mode of partition was violated, as kind of the land was not taken into account. LPA No.617 of 2010 4. We are unable to accept the submission. Kind or value of land being questions of fact, findings concurrently arrived at by the revenue authorities and affirmed by learned Single Judge are not liable to be interfered with unless shown to be perverse. We are unable to hold the said finding to be perverse. 5. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. ( ADARSH KUMAR GOEL ) JUDGE May 12, 2010 ( ALOK SINGH ) ashwani JUDGE 2