R.A.No. 46 of 2010(O&M) in C.W.P.No. 3087 of 1989 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.A.No. 46 of 2010(O&M) in C.W.P.No. 3087 of 1989 Date of decision: 7th July, 2010 The Haryana State Cooperative Land Development Bank Ltd. .......Appellant Versus The Presiding Officer Labour Court and another ........Respondents BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KANNAN Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Advocate for the applicant-respondent no. 2. Mr. S.S.Dalal, Advocate, for the non-applicant-appellant. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?Yes/No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No K.Kannan, J.(Oral) 1. The application is for reviewing the order passed by this Hon'ble Court on 3.12.2009, upholding the termination order effected by the management and allowing the writ petition. The application is filed by the wife of respondent no. 2 contending that workman had died and she has been granted a compassionate appointment. 2. The applicant-respondent no. 2 cannot come by any harm by the order already passed and there is no need for review. If the apprehension is that the applicant-respondent No. R.A.No. 46 of 2010(O&M) in C.W.P.No. 3087 of 1989 2 2 will be removed from service by virtue of the fact that writ petition was allowed, there is again no scope for such apprehension and I am informed that by the counsel for the non- applicant-appellant that he is still in service of the respondent even after the disposal of writ petition. The applicant's appointment shall not be taken to be dependent on the outcome of the writ petition. The application for review is therefore, dismissed. [K.KANNAN] JUDGE 7th July, 2010 Shivani Kaushik