¥ y CF /w/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR Writ petitio%$3No. ”2% / 2006 L5) Petitioner /' R.C. Sahu, Age'58 Yrs. S/o Late Jeevanlal Sahu Chief Executive V Officer, Janpad Panchayat Chura, ofa\“VJO. ......... The e . arla 'bandR' , alpur ' ....... . ..... *sm .V" “v“ VERSUS i $0 \ig” %..... Q Qs ifg e 3% Q weak‘w Respondent z State of Chhattisgarh, Thxough: Secretary, Anusuchit Ianjati tathu Anusuchit Iati Vikas Vibhag, Mantmlayn, Raipur HRIT PETITION UIA. 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIQN XI—HC—78 (£3 w w , m , m Wm ‘M?N¢“\\&W>~ a1 200 WW(W) mmm 14-8—2006 WW%’WW I %awf%uem%w m m w m wvoiuntary retirement Shri Raja Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the State/respondent, on advance copy. Heard. This is the second petition med by the petitioner questioning his transfer order dated 28-6-2006 ais weii as the order passed on his representation dated 29‘“ Juiy 2006. Eariier, the petitioner filed a it Petition No.3361/2006 questioning his transfer from Janpad Pancb yat Chhura to Janpad Panchayat, Tokapal, District Bastar. Panchayat. wife, old age mother and premature transfer in the earlier writ petition. On the request of learned counsel the petitioner, the petitioner was allowed to make a representation to the appropriate authority and in pursuance of the order of this Cou' ‘dated 11-7-2006, the petitioner made a representation to the Secretary, vernment of Chhattisgarh. However, same has been rejected vide order ated 29‘" July 2006 (Annexure-P/1). Learned counsel for the p titioner tried his level best to raise ground for staying the transfer ord r, but the petitioner has not been able to make out a case for interim relie by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India at this stage. Learned counsel for the p itioner made a statement before the Court that on account of personal fiiculties of the petitioner, it is difticult for the petitioner to continue in he service, therefore, looking to his personai dimculty, he wants to mo e anapplication before the Secretary the Secretary be directed to decide The pe itioner is working as CEO of Janpad The petition raised ertain difficulties about ailment of his \ P.T.O. Q a r r o i the meanwhile, he should not b posting and service record sho ‘ otherwise the petitioner will not be time. - The prayer made by learne and reasonable. Therefore, if th voiuniary retirement before the Secretary. Anusuchit Janjati Tatha Anusuchit llati Vikas Vibhag, Manlralaya, Raipur within a week, then the Secretary to decide his application within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of the application, Barve relieved from the present place of ld also not be transferred to Bastar able to get the retiral benefits in due counsel for the petitioner is just, fair petitioner moves an application for in accordance with law. During that period, if the petitioner is not releved, he should not be relieved and service record of the petitioner should age not be transferred to Bastar. With the direction aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.3297/2006 also stands disposed of. Certified copy be given today itself. . / Sd/— L.C. Bhadoo Judge a ,g/ y P.T.O. ma XI-HC—78 mW,m,W mm ooo§¢‘oooooo.oo‘ooooo HE 200 mm(W) am anam WW WWW § fgQ‘T WI? am 3amW WW 311w r17? ._. as 31%:m the case of the petitioner regardin ‘ voiuntary retirement at the earliest. In