(^ eo' IN IHE HIGH COJRT OP JUDICA'TURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION NO.^'5 6*S OF 2003 ^ BETWEESH Smto Sanju Ghourasiya (E|/o gtiri Bhrigunandan Prasad) Wifeof giiri Anil Chourasiya^ aged ^bout .32 years^ /^ reSident ofH.I.Q. 112 (HUDCO), @r. Raj^ndra Erasad ^zas^(co)' 0%%?^ EETITIONER '^>>^>^^ yy^^ A •i-'^\4'' .-y^ ''^^ ^' !• 3. A_N_D Ihe State of Chhattisgarh^ rEhrough the Secretary Bepartm^it of Heal-th Services^ Mantralay^ D»K»S»Bjilding^ Raipur (03) • rl1he Director^ Mrectorate of Healtii Services^ Ghhattisgarh^ Raipur^ Tehsil and District Raipur (OG)» 3he <l3int Director^ Heaitii ^rvices^ BilaspurEAvision^ Bilaspur^ Tehsil and District Bilaspar (03)• 4 ^_^..±^ v ^"v., r^.-^1 ^*rf fr " "^*rf fr RESPQHDENTS £. WKIT E)ETITI(»T UNDER XRTICLES 226/22'? OP SHB CONSTITUTICN O? INDIA ^p^^-- XI-HC—78 w<^f ^r t^w ?WW^?^l:IW .53, 'S'S?'^TraT^T, '^ft^FI^, [®idiy^< _^..N'J:.?...2J^...^>.. W^ir'^5?TW""""""""""""""""""""""""""^200 ^yr 'T^T (^f^^) ^•?aTW; ^f?? a^r 11.02.2004 Shri Shailendra Soni, Shri Raabir Siagh, The peUtioner has 226 & 227 oftiie uiactlou on the part of the r{ Staff Nurse. The case of the years diploma course of Hospital, BUaspur iii the ^ passed M.A. exainiaation. years diploxna coiirse iti to fhis effcct was issuedl Aniiexure P~9. Thereaftejr appUcation for enUstiag Nurses Registi'ation docunients aiid subsequenft was assigued tlie nuinbel validity of the registratiori| Ceruficate is Annexure P-10 naaie has also been Exchaiige iii tlie year Health Scrvices issued aa Dn'ectors, Health. Services, respective division from wh^ -tlirpp y<a^rs cniir.se Jn Geberal Ur Coujicil, ^i^t^i^i'T 'RPTOf ^* f^st <f^^K ^^fm 371^1 counsel for the petitioner, G^vt. Adv. for the State. pr^Jferred ftiis writ petition under Article Constitu|tion of India bemg aggrieved by tlie r^spondents for not appointiiig her as petiti^ucr i^ that she had passed fhe thrce ^peneral Nursing from Sardar Patel j^eai' 1998. The petitioner had also jAfter successful coBipletion of fhrce Nursiag- Midwifery a certificate to the pctitionen copy thcrcof is :, ttie petitioner submitted an name m the RoU of Mahakoshal Bhopal supported with the bsequen^h\ her name was registered and she V-1986 on 13.10.1998 aud the certificate was up to 12.10.2003. to tlie writ petition. The petitioner's ui fhe RoU of Employnient On 11.02.1999 the Director of c^rder (Anncxure P-14) to all tlie Jotsit IM.P. aad allotted the tramees to the :re tliey have successfuUy completed Nursiag for issuaace of their eulisted 19C<9. ^eiiera^ L&5S& XI..RC—78 'OT^l^T^W cP4T W^T ^HW '3"%T '^TFTR;R, '®xli'y^i<o,-t^FTTHy ^...^£....Sl6i./..............._-. ^i^ir^m^":";f"?""""<'<<"v"y""""""""""^ 2003 ^T^T Ti^^ (^f^^T) i^iw^rfN^r^y foroial appoiiitoient order 04 In this order it has been cU fallcn vacaiit in. tih.eir divisl should be submitted to tbl ^vhose naines appeared atj atlocated to Btlaspur Divisi4 Staff uurse, The petitionerj responde.nt No.3 vide lette| petitioner vide Annexure P»l| 20.04.1999 at 11.00 a.m. ^J scrutiny aiid verification a4.d. issuaiice of the appoiatoiE| ccxtiiicates, The gricvan.cc of before respoudent No.3 aad no appointment order has t( years, Then fhe petitioneit various dates ie, on 26,03| 10.09,2003 but of no avail, still lytag vacant but fhey ar^ Leamed counsel for petitioner xaay be allowed t^ respondent No.2 and respjs consider fhc rcprescntatict appropriate order regardm^ State Counsel has no objecti^: ^TFlfepr?h 'PfR^ff ^ ft^t <f^-^l< ^^tfim^n^i fhe vacant post of flie staff nur^e. ^arly inentioned fhat if no post are .on, the infonnation to that effect e Directorate OfHce, The traiaees •Sr. No.48, 54 & 62 have been )H for appQiiitnient 011 fhe post of s narae was at Sr, No.50 aiid the dated 30.03.1999 iiiforaied the 5 to remain preseiit m the office on loiigwitti atl origmal ceittficates for fhere is direction regardio.g fhe ent after verification of all the f the petitioncr is that shc appcared showed her origiiial docunients but >een issued even after lapse of two niade several represeutatious on .2001, 12.07.2002, 05.05.2003 & Moreover, the post of staff nurse is not appomtmg Uic petitioner. the petitioner submits tliat the raake a detaUed representation to Dudent No.2 inay be directed to ln of fhe petitioncr aad pass his grievaaces, to wliich learned )U. ——^-- XI-HC—78 ^www^w -5-^f ^[[^f?^, '^ftwrg', ^iray Jz/.il.l^.. ^200 ^n^?T ^r^r (^3^^) W<¥f^T f^TW •^m ^^T^^N^¥r leained ajacl Haviag heard fh.e having regmxl to tlie facts pctitiouer is allowcd to inake her grievaQ.ces witimi teu d4] aiid m tuiTi, respondent No.2| of the petitioner aiid niateri^l decide the representation wit|iiii date of rcccipt of the sainc ia| with Uie law< Wifli tlie above dii'ectioiis In view of this orderj lieailag staiid disposed of Certificd copy as per n4cs, ±tun ^Rfep^ Y[R^f "^* fe^ ^T^R ^^TRW^T^T counsel for the parties and circiuiistanices of the case, the ^ detailcd reprcsexitatiou raisio.g a]l [js from today to respondent No.2 1 after consideiiiig all flie grievaiices subinitted by fhe petitioner shaU a period of tliirty days froin the jau objcctivc inaaner ia accordancc tiie petitioii staiids disposed of. I.A. No. 10,218/2003 for urgent Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge