1 ABA 360-2011 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.360 OF 2011 Charudatta Arun Sonvalkar ..Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.Rajesh Jadhav & Mr.A.S.Kale, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr.Y.M.Nakhawa, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 3RD MAY, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. This is an application for anticipatory bail by a husband against whom wife has made allegation of ill treatment after the husband has filed a divorce petition. According to the applicant, the first informant was suffering from epilepsy. Therefore, he has filed divorce petition. The probability of the victim having been ill 2 ABA 360-2011 treated on this count cannot be ruled out. The victim had stated in the FIR that her ornaments have been retained by the applicant when she was driven out of the house. There is nothing in the divorce petition or the notices exchanged to show that the victim had left matrimonial house with the ornaments. Therefore, in order to recover the ornaments the investigating officer may or even may not seek custody of the applicant. Therefore, there is no question of granting anticipatory bail to the applicant. 3. Criminal Application is rejected. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)