mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2898 OF 2009 Smt.Vaishali K. Chipole ... Petitioner versus Smt.Meena Ruben Solanki & Anr ... Respondents ... Mr. H.M. Inamdar for petitioner Mr. A.S. Shitole APP for the State. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATED : 12th November 2009 P.C. 1. Heard. 2. I am not inclined to interfere in exercise of a writ jurisdiction for reasons more than one. 3. The order is an interlocutory order. 4. I am informed at the bar that the trial is over and the matter is posted for arguments. It would not be appropriate at this stage to interfere. 5. Needless to say that the petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the impugned order if the final decision is adverse to him. With these observations,the writ petition is dismissed. (D.G. KARNIK,J.)