IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN FRIDAY, THE 29TH JULY 2011 / 7TH SRAVANA 1933 OP (FC).No. 2409 of 2011(R) --------------------------- OP.191/2010 of FAMILY COURT,KOLLAM .................... PETITIONER(S): -------------------- HAMEENA, D/O.BASHEER, ANSAR MANZIL, INCHAVILA P.O., PERINAD, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL SRI.SAIJU S. SRI.T.PRASAD RESPONDENT(S): --------------- SHAFEEQ, S/O.SUBARIKUTTY, EDAYILA MURIYIL PUTHIYA VEEDU, PUTHENSANKETHAM, KOIVILA P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV.B.SURESH KUMAR THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN OP(FC).2409/11 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1:THE TRUE COPY OF THE OP(C).191/2010 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, KOLLAM. /TRUE COPY/ THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ----------------------------------- O.P(FC).No.2409 OF 2011 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 29th day of July, 2011 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan,J. Heard counsel for the petitioner and Adv.B.Suresh Kumar on behalf of the respondent. The respondent married the petitioner. There were litigations between them; the respondent, suing for restitution of conjugal rights and the petitioner for gold and other claims. The application for restitution filed by the husband was dismissed and the wife's application for decree in relation to gold and money was partly allowed. As against that, the husband has filed Mat.A.326/11. We have, today, condoned the delay in filing that appeal and admitted the same. We have also granted a conditional order of stay of execution of the order impugned in that appeal. OP(FC).2409/11 2 The wife says that the husband has married again and that she needs a divorce. She has filed OP.191/10 before the Family Court, Kollam. She says that her parents are aging and on the totality of the facts and circumstances, her life will be ruined if the divorce proceedings are further dragged on. We are inclined to think that the petitioner herein is entitled to expeditious consideration of the application filed by her for dissolution of her marriage under Muslim Law. We, therefore, direct that on the petitioner producing a copy of this judgment before the Family Court, Kollam, with an application for early posting of O.P.191/10, learned Judge of the Family Court will consider that application most sympathetically and give expeditious consideration in disposing of the matter on priority basis. The original petition is ordered accordingly. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. Sd/- K.SURENDRA MOHAN, Judge. kkb.1/8.