IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN TUESDAY, THE 4TH JANUARY 2011 / 14TH POUSHA 1932 OP(C).No. 1341 of 2010(O) ------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN EP 38/04 IN LAR.25/1989 of SUB COURT,KOTTARAKKARA .................... PETITIONER ------------------ RAJAN,S/O.KUNJURAMAN,NAVANEETHIL (FROM BUNGLOW VEEDU),KIZHAKKEKARA MURI, KOTTARAKKARA VILLAGE,KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL SRI.SAIJU S. RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM , PIN 695 001. 2. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REP. BY THE SECRETARY, VAIDHYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM , PIN 695 001. BY G.P.SRI.B.JAYASOORYA THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: cms K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------ O.P(C).No.1341 OF 2010 ------------------------------ Dated this the 4th day of January, 2011 JUDGMENT In this Original Petition the petitioner challenges Exts.P5 and P6 orders. Ext.P6 order is the final order in the Execution Petition. Ext.P5 order was passed prior to Ext.P6 order directing the judgment debtor to deposit a particular amount. A revision lies against Ext.P6 order. In that revision, the petitioner would be entitled to challenge Ext.P5 order as well. Even otherwise there is no adjudication in Ext.P5 order and therefore, there is no bar in challenging Ext.P6 order as such. Since a revision lies, the Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to challenge Exts.P5 and P6 orders in revision. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE. cms