THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.906 of 2001 ORDER: The petitioners were appointed as Traffic Assistants by the APSRTC on consolidated salary. The basis for their appointment was their efficiency in different sports. The Corporation has initiated steps for appointing the petitioners as Junior Assistants, along with some others. The Selection Committee found the petitioners to be eligible for being appointed as Junior Assistants. However, orders of appointment were not issued. The petitioners feel aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents. The respondents filed a counter-affidavit, admitting the factum of the petitioners having been selected for the posts of Junior Assistants. It is, however, stated that, on account of the interim orders granted by this Court in various writ petitions, such as W.P.No.9207 of 1996, the orders of appointment were not issued to the petitioners. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents. The grievance of the petitioners is about the failure or refusal on the part of the respondents to issue orders of appointment, even after the petitioners were selected. The respondents do not dispute that the petitioners were selected for the posts of Junior Assistants. The only impediment was an interim order said to have been passed in W.P.No.9207 of 1996 and other similar matters. By all means, that writ petition may have been disposed of. If there does not exist any order of stay, the respondents would be under obligation to issue orders of appointment to the petitioners. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to take necessary steps for issuing orders of appointment to the petitioners, in case there do not exist any orders of stay from this Court. There shall be no order as costs. _____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.24.06.2010. GJ