bsb : 1 : IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1024 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.1024 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.1024 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1063 OF APPEAL NO.1063 OF APPEAL NO.1063 OF 2005 2005 2005 Sau. Sarika Ram More ... Applicant v/s. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda ¦ Court’s or Judge’s of Coram, appearances, Court’s ¦ Orders Order or Directions and ¦ Registrar’s Orders ¦ ------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Yogesh Pawar for the applicant. Mr. V.B.K. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for the Respondent. CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & SMT. SMT. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, NISHITA MHATRE, NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATED: 20TH DECEMBER, 2006 20TH DECEMBER, 2006 20TH DECEMBER, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The applicant was on bail during the trial. The trial is over and the appellant is convicted. Appeal against the conviction is admitted. In view of the fact that the appellant - applicant was on bail during trial and nothing adverse is available on record, we see no reason why he bsb : 2 : should not be granted bail. He be released on furnishing solvent security of Rs.40,000/- with two sureties in the like amount. Application disposed of. .....