IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27413 of 2008 DILIP KUMAR JHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 20.08.2008 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for the offence under section 420/409/467/468/469/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is not the named accused. It is further submitted that the specific allegation is against the named accused Brahmdeo Kamat, who allegedly misappropriated the money after interpolating the records. It is also contended that as a matter of fact the petitioner joined the office as Head Assistant on 31st of December, 1999 and handed over the charge on 30th of January, 2001 i.e. prior to the period in question during which the misappropriation was done. Considering the submissions as noticed above, and in the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, namely, Dilip Kumar Jha be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of 2 the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani, in connection with Laukaha (Khutauna ) P.S.Case No. 18 of 2003 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)