1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 2555 OF 2009 Vishal Jitendra Shah S/o. Jitendra Jagjivandas Shah ...Petitioner Versus Rachita Vishal Shah Nee Rachita Arvind Kitawat & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. J.J. Shah for the Petitioner Respondent No. 1, in person, present Ms. Gunjan Shah with Mr. Arvind Rathod for Respondents No. 2 and 3. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE: OCTOBER 16, 2009 P.C.:- Though we had not issued any notice in this case, in which the petitioner wants production of respondent No.1, respondent No. 1 is present in person, and she submits that the notice has been served on the respondents. She is identified by the 2 petitioner, who is also present in the Court. The parents of the petitioner are also present. 2. We have recorded the statement of respondent No. 1, in which she states that though she had married the petitioner, but she did not want to live with the petitioner, and she is staying with her parents out of her own free will. 3. The petition is misconceived and dismissed. 4. Since this petition has been filed without any reason, and if there was any dispute between the parties, the petitioner should have gone to the Family court, and not the High Court. Therefore, costs of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) are imposed on the petitioner, to be paid to respondent No. 1 within two weeks. BILAL NAZKI, J. A.R. JOSHI, J.