IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 3626 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION : 12.03.2008 Sukhwinder Singh .... PETITIONER Versus The Presiding Officer, Debt Recovery Tribunal, Chandigarh and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Mr. Arvind Mittal, Advocate, for the petitioner. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. (Oral ) The petitioner has filed this petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 22.2.2008, passed by the Presiding Officer, Debt Recovery Tribunal, Chandigarh, whereby the auction sale has been set aside and the re-auction has been ordered. Undisputedly, against the aforesaid impugned order, remedy of appeal has been provided under Section 20 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, which remedy has not been availed by the petitioner. After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner stated that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with CWP No. 3626 of 2008 -2- liberty to avail the alternative remedy, in accordance with law. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE March 12, 2008 ( RAKESH KUMAR GARG ) ndj JUDGE