IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1997 of 2009 DEVI DAYAL SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 10.2.2009 On the own showing of the petitioner his grievance with regard to payment of pension has already been looked into by the Corporation which has held the petitioner to be not entitled for pension because he did not opt for payment of such pension in the appropriate scheme. This fact has been noticed by this Court in an order dated 30.4.2003 in M.J.C.No. 1279/2002. The petitioner, however, even in this writ application has not challenged the aforementioned decision of the Corporation and therefore, the decision of the Corporation still remain operative. If that be so, the claim of the petitioner for payment of pension cannot be gone into in this writ application. As with regard to payment of provident fund etc. the petitioner has also filed representations, as contained in Annexure 10 series. It would however appear that the payment of provident fund in part was also made to him directly from the 2 office of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, as is clear from the statement made in paragraph 10 of the writ application. The grievance of the petitioner that such calculation was not made correctly and the petitioner was entitled for some more amount can definitely not be gone into in its writ jurisdiction and if that be the only grievance of the petitioner, the petitioner has definitely a remedy of filing a representation before the appropriate authority confined to payment of the amount of provident fund. With the aforementioned observation and direction this application is disposed of. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/