IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39954 of 2010 DEEPAK KUMAR, S/o Sri Rajendra Tanti, R/o Vill.- Mahamda, P.O. – Pattam, P.S. – Naya Ram Nagar, Distt. - Munger Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 10.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Narsingh Tanti, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. The petitioner, who is in custody in Kotwali P.S. Case No. 334 of 2010 for the offence under Sections 467, 468, 420, 471 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code has prayed for grant of bail on the ground that entire allegation was made against one Prasant Bharti. Even in the F.I.R. the petitioner was only shown as an Assistant in the Office of ‘Jan Kalyan Rastriya Swastha Mission’. It was further submitted that despite the fact that nothing cogent material was collected against the petitioner, the petitioner has been made accused and is in custody since 10.8.2010. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor, of-course, has opposed the prayer for bail but he is also not disputing the fact that main allegation was made against Prasant Bharti. In view of the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, Deepak Kumar, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger, in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 334 of 2010. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)