IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7645 of 2002 1. RANGBALO DEVI, W/O SRI SITA RAM PASWAN, R/O VILLAGE-KARAMCHHATA, P.S.-KOCHAS, DISTRICT-ROHTAS, A/P H.M. TEACHER, RAJKIYA PRATHMIK SCHOOL KARAMCHHATA, P.S.-KOCHAS, DISTRICT-ROHTAS. ……………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCTION, BIHAR, PATNA. 4. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, ROHTAS. 5. B.F.O. OFFICER, KARGAHRAR BLOCK, P.S.- KARGAHAR, DISTRICT-ROHTAS. 6. B.F.O. OFFICER, DINARA BLOCK, P.S.-DINARA, DISTRICT-ROHTAS. 7. B.F.O. OFFICER, DAWATH BLOCK, P.S.-DAWATH, DISTRICT-ROHTAS. 8. HEADMASTER, RAJKIYA MIDDLE SCHOOL, SOBHIPUR, P.S.-KOCHAS, DISTRICT-ROHTAS. 9. HEADMASTER, RAJKIYA MADHYA VIDYALAYA, PARSATHA, P.S.-KOCHAS, DISTRICT-ROHTAS. 10. HEADMASTER, MIDDLE SCHOOL, BARHATI, P.S.- KOCHAS, DISTRICT-ROHTAS. 11. HEADMASTER, MIDDLE SCHOOL, KOCHAS, P.S.- KOCHAS, DISTRICT-ROHTAS. 12. HEADMASTER, PRATHMIK SCHOOL GIRDHARIYAN, P.S.-DINARA, DISTRICT-ROHTAS. 13. HEADMASTER, PRATHIMIK SCHOOL DINARA, P.S.-DINARA, DISTRICT-ROHTAS. 14. HEADMASTER, PRATHMIK SCHOOL DHABACHHUAN, P.S.-KOCHAS, DISTRICT-ROHTAS. 15. HEADMASTER, MIDDLE SCHOOL, DOJAN, P.S.- KOCHAS, DISTRICT-ROHTAS. 16. HEADMASTER, PRATHMIK SCHOOL GHASA, P.S.- KARGAHAR, DISTRICT-ROHTAS. 17. HEADMASTER, PRATHIMIK SCHOOL KUSAHI, P.S.-DINARA, DISTRICT-ROHTAS. 18. HEADMASTER, PRATHMIK SCHOOL LAKHANPURA, P.S.-DAWATH, DISTRICT-ROHTAS. 19. HEADMASTER, PRATHIMK SCHOOL KUSAHI, P.S.- DINARA, DISTRICT-ROHTAS. ………………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 6 18.05.2010 I.A. No. 1401 of 2003. This I.A. has been filed by Sri Mahesh Prasad II for expunging the remark made by this 2 Court against him in the order dated 4.3.2003. He submits that he had acted only on the instructions of the petitioner and there was no professional impropriety committed by him. Therefore, he has prayed for withdrawal of the said remark made by this Court. Considering the statements made in the I.A. application, the same is allowed and the remarks made against Sri Mahesh Prasad II in the order dated 4.3.2003 is expunged. This writ application is confined to petitioner no. 1 only. Sri Prasad submits that the petitioner had filed this writ application for payment of her arrears of salary of the certain periods. However, he submits that he has no instruction as to whether the same has been paid to the petitioner by now or not. As such he prays to withdraw this application with liberty to petitioner no. 1 to move afresh in case any of his grievances still subsists. Prayer is allowed. The writ application is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner no. 1 as aforesaid. Arvind/ (J. N. Singh, J.)