@ M H!GH CGUR? OF JUDECATURE AT E!LASPUR. CHHATTI§GARH SSNGLE EENCH : HéN’ELE SH§§ Hi5. SQTTU, C‘J. Wyit Petition Norm-G9 of 20oz, Petitioher: Gcpai Eas, aged abaut 59 years. Sic. Mangatram, Shcp Ne. 4.8 & 38 Hardware Shop. Shyam TaEkies Road, Biiaspur (C.G.) Versus Respondents: 1. State of Chhamsgarh Through, Secretary Laca§ Welfare Department, Secretariat, Raipur. Nagar Nigam, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3. The CoHector Biiaspuf (C G ) 2. The Comm§ssioner Pmsen’t Dr Shailesh Amua counsei for The pehhoner Shh Sumesh Bayau, Government Advocate fot respondents No 1 and 3 Shh AS Kachhawahe ceunsei far respondent No 2 ORAL ORDER (Passed on 14th March, 2007; The petitioner is CL. shopkeeper having his shop near Shyam Taikies, Biiaspur. (2) The petitioner, apprehending that the respondents may demolish his shop without issuing riotice to him, has approached this Court in this petition fiied under Articies 226/227 of the Constitution of indie. (3) This Court, whiie entertaining the writ petition, had granted an interim otder of stay, staying the demolition of the shop beionging to the petitioner. f The respondents have entered their appearance thmugh They have aiso filed their counter affidavit. !n that they have stated on oath that :hey have no intention to demelish the shoe bebnging to the petitioney. (4) iheir {earned counse!. (5) In View of the above, this writ petiiion ie disposed of. if for any reason‘ respondenis take any step to demolish the shop beionging to the petitioner, he is at iiberty to approach this Court once again. Ordered accordingly. kw