IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.5448 of 2006 Between: 1 Tanda Surya Prakash, S/o. Narayana, R/o. 11-1-829, New Boiguda, Hyderabad. 2 Rasumatta Jagannadham, S/o. Venkatesham, H.No. 11-1-829, New Boiguda, Hyd. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Govt of A.P., rep. by its Prl., Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad./ 3 The Inspector of Police, Habeebnagar P.S., Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners:NONE APPEARED Counsel for the Respondents:AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal. In this writ petition, the petitioners sought for a writ of mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in arresting the petitioners in pursuance of opening of rowdy sheets against them, as illegal. At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioners. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submitted that on 16.11.2006, the rowdy sheets opened against the petitioners were closed. In view of this submission, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is, therefore, disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.6945 of 2006 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 5th JUNE, 2009. kvni