IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. 4716 of 2009 Date of decision:- 12.11.2009 Suresh Kumar Gupta petitioner vs State of Haryana and others Respondent Present: Mr. PK Mutneja, Advocate Mr. Kulvir Narwal, Addl. A.G.Hry. M.M.S.BEDI,J. Learned State counsel, on the instructions of the official of PGIMS, Rohtak, has informed that the petitioner will not been dispossessed from the shop in dispute except by due process of law. In view of the said statement, this petition is allowed, orders passed by the courts below are set aside in view of the admitted possession of the plaintiff- petitioner in the shop in dispute. The application for interim injunction is allowed to the effect that the petitioner will not be dispossessed from the shop in dispute except by adopting the due procedure of law. It is not out of place to mention here that proceedings, seeking the eviction of the petitioner, have already been commended by the respondents, regarding which the petitioner has already “a notice”. November 12 ,2009 (M.M.S.BEDI) TSM JUDGE