IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16647 of 2011 JAI PRAKASH SAO @ JAI PRAKASH SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 21.06.2011. Vide order dated 20.05.2011, anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner in complaint case no. 1066 of 2010, but it appears that inadvertently vide order no. 2 dated 20.05.2011 some draft format was created in computer and pronounced on 31.05.2011 without signature and the same has been transmitted through fax to the learned court below. Let the order no. 3 dated 20.05.2011 be read as anticipatory bail order granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner in this case in connection with complaint case no. 1066 of 2010. The order no. 2 dated 20.05.2011 which was inadvertently created in computer and pronounced has no relevancy in this case. Let the order no. 3 dated 20.05.2011 and this order be transmitted through fax to the learned S. D. J. M. West Muzaffarpur in connection with complaint case no. 1066 of 2 2010 at the cost of the petitioner. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)