S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7074/2009 (Vinod Gadia & Ors. Vs. The Recovery Officer & Ors.) DATE OF ORDER : 3.8.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA,J. Mr.Tribhuvan Gupta,for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Petitioner is aggrieved against the order dated 30.11.2007 by which recovery of Rs. 7,48,298/- has been raised against the petitioner under Section 14 B of the Employees Provident Fund and Misc. Provision Act, 1952. The contention of petitioner is that the order dated 30.11.2007 was passed after sending notice on petitioner's old address inspite of fact that petitioner duly informed that his unit has already been closed. It is submitted that petitioner when came to know about notice, why the arrest warrant may not be issued against the petitioner then by application dated 16.3.2009, petitioners submitted for recalling of order dated 30.11.2007. Learned counsel for the petitioner admitted that order dated 30.11.2007 is appealable and petitioner has not availed that remedy and preferred the writ petition to challenge the order dated 30.11.2007. In view of the above reason of availability of effective alternate remedy, the writ petition cannot be entertained. Hence, the petition is dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA),J. arti