1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 248/2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1723/2010 ARUN SUBHASHCHANDRA CHOPRA ..versus.. ASHITA ARUN CHOPRA =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-== Shri S.C.Khati, Counsel for appellant. Shri A.V.Bhide, counsel for respondent. C ORAM : D.K.DESHMUKH AND R. K. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED : 16 th SEPTEMBER, 2010 . By this L.P.A., the order passed by the learned Single Judge, rejecting the writ petition, against the order passed by the Family Court, fixing the interim maintenance to be given to a wife, is challenged. 2] Presently, admittedly, the husband is in service in United Kingdom, therefore, his pay package has been taken into consideration for working out the amount of interim maintenance. In case, he comes back to India, as he is in employment in U.K., what would be his earnings while he is in service in India, obviously, is not 2 relevant. In case, he comes back from U.K. and if his pay package is reduced in India, then he has a remedy to apply for seeking modification of the order of interim maintenance. 3] No interference with the order of the learned Single Judge is called for, specially considering the nature of the case. The appeal is rejected. The interim order will not survive. JUDGE JUDGE Rvjalit