IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 16TH JULY 2009 / 25TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 3348 of 2009(W) ------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. K.K.SASIDHARAN,S/O.KANDAN, KALATHIVELI, PATTANAKAD .P.O.,CHERTHALA. 2. K.K.MANIYAPPAN, S/O. KANDAN, KALATHIVELI, PATTANAKAD .P.O.,CHERTHALA. 3. K.SURENDERAN, S/O. KUNJAN, S.S.KOTTAGE, PATTANAKAD .P.O.,CHERTHALA. 4. R.SUBHASH, S/O.RAGHAVAN, SHAPPUVELI, PATTANAKAD P.O.,CHERTHALA. 5. ASOKAN, S/O. KARUNAKARAN, THAIPPRAMBIL, PATTANAKAD P.O., CHERTHALA. BY ADV. MR.P.V.JAYACHANDRAN. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, COLLECTORATE, ALLAPPUZHA. 2. THE SECRETARY, VAYALAR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PATTANAKKAD P.O.,CHERTHALA. 3. K.N.RADHAMANI, KALATHIVELIYIL, PATTANAKAD P.O.,CHERTHALA. R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR. MANU.V., R2 BY ADV. MR.J.OM PRAKASH, R3 BY ADV. MR.P.R.VENKETESH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/07/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.3348/2009-W: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE LAND RELINQUISHMENT FORM DTD. 17/10/2005. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE LETTER OF THE R.2. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE REQUEST OF THE PETITIONERS AND OTHERS DATED NIL. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DTD. 14/11/07. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.F/271/08 DTD. 24/01/08. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. Prv. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.3348 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of July, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioners and the third respondent have dispute in relation to a way. Whether it is a public way or a private way and whether orders are to be issued under Section 133 Cr.PC are matters stated to be pending before the first respondent pursuant to hearing, for which, it was listed as per Ext.P5 notice. May be this is a case where orders have already been issued but not communicated since more than 1½ years have passed after Ext.P4. If proceedings have not concluded, it is ordered that the first respondent shall conclude such proceedings within an outer limit of four months from now. If orders have already been issued, let copies of that be communicated to the first respondent, third respondent and to the first petitioner on behalf of petitioners 1 to 5. All other issues are left open to be adjudicated before the Revenue Divisional Officer. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.18/7.