IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14592 of 2006 ARJUN RAM, S/o Late Mishri Lal, Resident of Village- Maghra Sarai, P.S.- Deep Nagar, District – Nalanda. ------ Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Bihar, Patna. 2. The Magadh University through its Vice-Chancellor at Bodh Gaya, District – Gaya. 3. The Vice-Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. 4. The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. 5. The Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. 6. The Principal, Nalanda College, Biharsharif. ---------- Respondents ---------- 14 02.05.2011 Heard Sri Neeraj Raj, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Apurva Kumar, learned A.C. to Standing Counsel No. 10 and learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent/Magadh University. Learned counsel for respondent/Magadh University, submits that in view of statement made in counter affidavit, it is evident, that almost all the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed. The statement made by learned counsel for the University has not been refuted by Sri Neeraj Raj, learned counsel for the petitioner, on the ground that he is not in touch with the client. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that writ petition may be disposed of with an observation, that if still some grievances exist, the petitioner may file representation before the competent authority. In view of stand taken by learned counsel for the parties there is no need to further keep the matter pending. 2 The writ petition stands disposed of with an observation, that if still some grievances exist, the petitioner will be at liberty to file representation before the competent authority. It is expected, that if such representation is filed, same will be examined in its right perspective, without any delay. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)