IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH JULY 2010 / 16TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 14034 of 2010(D) --------------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- JAYATHI DEVI, AGED 61 YEARS, D/O.PARUKUTTY AMMA, PARAMEKKAVU EAST LANE, ST.MARY'S COLLEGE ROAD, CHEMBUKAVU VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THRISSUR DISTRICT 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, EAST POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 4. RAMADAS KOTTAYIL, CHEEYARAM HOSPITAL, RUGMINI KOTTAYIL, ENCLAVE, THRISSUR DISTRICT 5. VIJAYAKUMAR,S/O. NEDUNGADI,SREECHITHRA VEETTIL, NEAR GANAPATHI KOVIL,SEKHARIPURAM VILLAGE,PALAKKADU DISTRICT. R1 RO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI T.K. VIPINDAS. ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU FOR R4& R5 SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL) FOR R4&R5 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.(C).NO.14034 OF 2010 D PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION SENT THROUGH SPEED AND SAFE COURIER SERVICE DATED 8.4.2010. EXT.P1(A) TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF THE COURIER SERVICE SHOWING THE CONSIGNEES AS 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P1(B) TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF THE COURIER SERVICE SHOWING THE CONSIGNEES AS 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: EXT.R4(A) TRUE COPY OF THE MAHAZAR DATED 14.10.2008 PREPARED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER, S.B.I., THRISSUR. // True Copy // PS to Judge K. M. JOSEPH & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. -------------------------------------------------- W.P(C). NO.14034 OF 2010 D --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th July, 2010 JUDGMENT K.M. Joseph, J. Petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayer: “Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction compelling and commanding respondents 1 to 3 to give effective and adequate police protection to the life of the petitioner's husband, two sons and herself from the respondents 4 and 5 and from their henchmen.” 2. It is stated that the fourth respondent is the petitioner's husband's brother and the fifth respondent is her own brother. There is allegation raised against the fourth respondent that he is, with the help of the fifth respondent, hatching a conspiracy to murder the petitioner and her husband and children. Petitioner sent Ext.P1 petition. 3. Today, we heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, WPC.14034/2010 D 2 learned counsel appearing for respondents 4 and 5 and also the learned Government Pleader. Learned counsel for respondents 4 and 5 would submit that respondents 4 and 5 have no intention to cause any threat to the life of the petitioner or her husband or two sons. We record the submission and direct that in case respondents 1 to 3 are alerted of any threat by respondents 4 and 5, respondents 1 to 3 shall give effective police protection to the life of the petitioner, her husband and two sons. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Sd/= K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE Sd/= M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JUDGE kbk. // True Copy // PS to Judge