IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43062 of 2008 SANJAY SHARMA @ SANJAY @ SANJAY BISHVAKARMA … … Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Sunita Devi … … Opp. Parties For the petitioner: Shri Jitendra Kumar For the State: Shri Dashrath Mehta,A.P.P. - - - - 2. 16.10.2008 Heard Shri Jitendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Dashrath Mehta, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The dismissal of anticipatory bail petition earlier filed by the petitioner was made in Cr. Misc. No. 33199 of 2007. The learned Sessions Judge, on renewal of the prayer before him, has made certain observations and there were certain directions to the petitioner. The petitioner could accordingly abide by that directions and the Court feels that the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj who could be hearing the regular prayer of the petitioner on his surrendering before him, shall consider the only fact that the parties were living together after compromise between them. He shall have to be satisfied about it and that 2 could be done by taking the complainant before him. The petitioner should surrender with his wife in the court below so that the court is in a better position to appreciate the new fact of compromise. The Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate shall not be prejudiced by any order of rejection of anticipatory bail petition. This petition is accordingly disposed of. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)