'v'-f, '•^•. ^r"1' •^s, iy"iii!:lK.-li" HIGHCOURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SinaleBench : Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh. J. Criminal Revisfon No. 248 of 2006 RCTisioneF Resnondents : . Bhajan Singh, aged 30 years, Son of Gelha Ram rathia, R/o Kalmttikra, P.S. Tehsil - Kartala, District - Korba (C.G.) VCTSUS ..il ' 1. Smt. Kaushatya Bai, aged -25 years, wife of Bhajan Singh Rathia, readents of Village - Zilga, P.S. - Kartala, Distt.-Korba. 2. Durga Prassul (mlnor), aged 3 yrs. Son of Bhajan Singh through Natural Guardian and Mother Smt Kaushalya Bai, son of Bhqan Smt. Kaushalya Bai, son of Bhajan Singh Rathia, resident of Vlllage Jilga, P.S. TehsB - Kartala, District- Korba (C.G.) Criminal Revision U/S / 397 RW-401 Cr.P.C. 1973 atona with U/S 19 (41 of Familv Court Act Present : Shri Ravish Verma. counsel for the petitfoner. Shri Kalyan Kalamkar, counsel for ttie responctent No.1. OWU.OROER (Passad on 28m AprB, 2009) Heard on admission, 2. The petitioner/husband is aggrieved by the order dated 21 .02.2006 passed by Uie Family Court in M.J.C. No. 205/2(X% granting monthly maintenance of Rs.750/- to respondent No.1 white r^ecting the prayer for grant of maintenance to Durga Prasad, minor child ofttie petifioner. 3. Having heard learned counsel for tfte petitoner, 1 have perused the record of M.J.C. No.205/2005. There Is no material to substantiate the altegation levetted by ttie petltloner herein that respondent No.1 had iUidt relationship witti her brottisr-in-law. Even the fattier of Uie peUtioner has, jn his tesdmony before the Family Court, shown complrte ignorance about this. The fact <hat in a Panchayat the respondent No.lAwfe had gone^to- !tSf.i;;.l ^^ 1 •»syy isSfMSSMt live vwth ttie petitioner at the behest of the Panchayat also nins counter to \> the altegatfon tevelled by the pefifioner. So far as the quantum of maintenance awanted by the Family Court is concemed, the tesfimony of the petittoner does not show any details about his incwne. tn any case, fcAAA. Ure maintenance awarded by fte Family Court is the .feear minimum for survhral. <!'. 4. There is no merit in ttiis re<Msion which is accordingly <fismfesed at flie ^s(e of admission. 0 Sd-/ • Judge N "'-;' Ui !i