IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 1474 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.10.2010 Bakhshish Singh .....Petitioner Versus Shri Arun Goel and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri M.K. Dogra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri S.S. Sahu, AAG, Punjab. Hemant Gupta, J. (Oral) Shri S.S. Sahu, learned AAG, Punjab, states that the payment due to the petitioner has been made. However, learned counsel for the petitioner points out that there are discrepancies in the payments made and the amount payable to the petitioner. In view of the said fact, the present contempt petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation pointing out discrepancies in the payments made. As and when such representation is filed, the competent authority shall consider and decide the same, in accordance with law. [ HEMANT GUPTA ] JUDGE 12.10.2010 Preeti/ds