1 78 D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 1008/2008. Narendra Singh Shekhawat Vs. Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur & Ors. ... Date of Order :: 23rd April 2010. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.SAPRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr. Himmat Arora & Mr. Akhilesh Rajpurohit for Mr. M.S. Singhvi, for the appellant. Mr. P.K. Lohra, for the respondent No.4. <><><> BY THE COURT: This is an appeal filed by the respondent No.4 of CWP No. 6348/2008 under Rule 134 of the Rajasthan High Court Rules, 1952 against an order dated 23.10.2008 passed by the learned Single Judge in the aforementioned writ petition. The learned counsel Mr. P.K. Lohra for the respondent No.4 (writ-petitioner) at the outset brought to our notice that this appeal has rendered infructuous because after passing of the impugned order, the appellant was later transferred to a place called Phalodi at his own request. In the light of the aforesaid subsequent development which has taken place during the pendency of this appeal and has a material bearing over the issue involved in appeal, we are of the considered opinion that this appeal has now rendered infructuous because the basic issue involved in the writ petition was about the posting/transfer of the two officers of the State who are parties to 2 this appeal. It no longer survives because as observed supra, the appellant has since been transferred to a new place called Phalodi pending appeal and he having accepted the new place of posting and joined there, there remains nothing in the writ petition nor in this appeal. Accordingly and in view of the discussion aforesaid, this appeal is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. (DINESH MAHESHWARI ), J. (A.M.SAPRE ), J. /Mohan/ 3