1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 119 OF 2009 Satishchandra Sitaram Nandyog & Anr. ....Petitioners Versus Parvati Shankar Balgi & Ors. ....Respondents. Mr. Abhay S. Khandeparkar i/b. S.R.Saudagar for the Petitioners. Mr. Y. S. Bhate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 7. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 27TH APRIL, 2009. P.C. Mr. Khandeparkar, learned Counsel for the Petitioners, after taking instructions from Petitioner No.1 who is present in the Court, seeks leave to withdraw the Civil Revision Application. Leave as prayed for, is granted. Civil Revision Application is disposed of, as withdrawn. 2. Mr. Khandeparkar, learned Counsel, submits that the Petitioners are running hotel in the suit premises since the year-1973. He further submits that the decree on the ground of bonafide requirement is passed in respect of first floor premises only and no decree on the ground of bonafide requirement was passed in respect of the premises situated on 2 2nd floor. However, the fact remains that the decree of eviction of entire suit premises is passed on the ground of subletting the part of premises in favour of Respondent No.4. The Petitioners are having a lodge in the suit premises which is the only source of their and their employees livelihood. In the circumstances, he claims one year's time to vacate the suit premises. Mr. Bhate, learned Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 7, after taking instructions from his client who is present in the Court has no objection if one year's time is given to the Petitioners to vacate the suit premises subject to filing undertaking. In view of the statement made by the Petitioners and concession given by the Respondents, the Petitioners are granted one year's time to vacate the suit premises subject to filing usual undertaking within the period of four weeks from today. (R. V. MORE, J.)