IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM THURSDAY, THE 28TH OCTOBER 2010 / 6TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 31090 of 2010(I) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- K.S.BHAGAVALDAS, S/O.LATE K.K.SUDEVAN, KANDATH HOUSE, THENKURUSSI, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.G.HARIHARAN SRI.PRAVEEN.H. RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE TAHSILDAR, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN 678 541. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, THENKURUSSI- I VILLAGE, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN 678 671. 3. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, SECOND CIRCLE, COMMERCIAL TAX COMPLEX, NEAR CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD, PIN 678 001. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.C.K.GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.31090 of 2010 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T ---------------------- The petitioner is seeking direction to restrain recovery steps proceeded against on the basis of Ext.P4 and P5 notices, till finalisation of Ext.P6 application submitted seeking benefits under the Amnesty scheme. 2. Learned Government Pleader on the basis of instructions submitted that Ext.P6 application has already been considered and disposed of by the 3rd respondent, allowing benefits under the Amnesty scheme. A proceedings in this regard was already issued on 30.9.2010 and the same was despatched to the petitioner, is the submission. It is further submitted that in view of the benefits granted under the Amnesty scheme, the revenue recovery authorities were already informed to keep in abeyance all further recovery steps, for enabling the petitioner to effect payment of the amounts under the Amnesty scheme. A letter in this regard was already issued by the 3rd respondent to the 1st respondent, on 14.10.2010. 3. Under the above circumstances the reliefs sought for in this writ petition no more survives for consideration. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE. W.P.(C).31090/10-I -2- okb