^ <s A\<^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIIASPUR W. P. No. 2-(^-L2-/2003 PETITIONER : Shatruidhan Lal Sahu S/0 Kali Ram Sahu, aged 36 years R/0 Vill-Dhardhai, PO-Bawali, TaH-Mungeli Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS KESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary ..^ General Administration Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) .•'£. •^-•"^8>? \^-'yr .^' ..^•'y^ t^>" 2. Collector, Bilaspur^ Dist-Bilaspur (C.G^f PETITION UNDER ARTICIiE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTZON OF INDIA. xi-itt-aa ^NWW, 'S^EPT8> RiWT^ iifiS%'% s(»'^>'^fi^i ;//.. <^i •'-i- ^<~b^' w*nw p >;*Kfi^f.i.i..fc*.^..A.?^.l*.^ 0(1 ^9-8-2003 Smt. ffleenu Shastri, counsel Heard. The petitioner's petition i; Census OeparTment as cpmpiler TTie work pf ths petitioner wa^ compiler from 6-8-9i to 31-5-92. to Other Backward Ciasses. Cej Annexure-P/3. TTie petitioner has The 6ovt. of Mcdhya time to ths effect that all the eml whose services have been terminal Term, fhey will be treated as surpl priority in the matter of appointnji the circular is Annexure-P/6. The respondent No.l 'has stating that the employees pf Cei^ surplus employees mjGhhattisgar^ need of separate dir^ction. Copy c^f The petitioner; has made sj competent authorit/.rei+eratjng a| effect. Copy of the last repre^e wis-aii'-^t ^Bsts.Si'^ <ti|<11^'iirfT ¥IT<^T^ 1*SMa ^ . ^?®%^i jforthepetitioner. 1 that he was appointed Jn the contract for specified duration. satisfac+ory and he worked as Moreover, the petitjoner belongs py of the caste certificate is t>een retrenched by the authority, issued a circula" from time to ilbyees of the Census Department •d ori account of the expiry of the jsempioyeesandTheywiltbegiven ent on thesimilar posts. Copy of issued a letter dated 19-2-2001 sus Oepaftment will be counted as 5tate also and theire wil! be no the same is Anne.^we-P/7. sveral representortions |before the the aboye contentsibut it has no is Annexure-P/lQ. It is,, pre^entation Bl N-sBe-^:^ igS^Hjffl^lSi^W^igCTi'aS'. (»<S-ll«Ki<6' "aq, aao l'S)^W ftS^KS^ ikWflfgy ,,^' ;<• therefore; requestecl that the absorb the petitjoner in any vacam workout a scheme to absorb employment. Ha^ing heiard the leamed couj regard to the facts ;and circums+al regard to the judgment of the Apea Tam!l Nadu and ansther Vs. ©. repor-ted in AIR 1999 SUPREttt Chhattisgarh roay aiso consider fftS' ©overfrsment emplpyees who had worked under ti^s of the direction giv'en by the |-lon'b|e is at liberty to apprdach The ©Over^me. moving the SovernmenT of Chhcttisbarh Administration may considenirtwH hi^ In view of this order, M.(W| 7402/2003 stcind dispitsed of. | Th6 writ petltton is disposed o wkf^<iswd?t ft«a®i<^ ^Sft*(Wf» ^spondent No.l be_directed to 1 appropriate availabie postor to the petitioner in appropriate {isel for The petiTioner and having c4css °f the case and also haying :ACourt in thematterof 6ovt. af M.ahamed Ameenuddin & Qthers CPURT 2202, ths fepvernment of for absorbing the seryices of Csasas bepartroent in +hs light Apex Court and the petitioner nent for absorption and on his i, the Department of Seneral presentation oippropriateiy. )P. No. 2211/2003 ahd l.A. No. f accordinaly. SdA L.C. Bhadoo Judge A'.i"' -L. IIIR SB'. ;^=,'i ;;:^<: •3f