IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 11191 of 2008 Between: 1 S. Hema Aditya S/o. S. Venkateswarlu Being minor rep. by his mother S. Sailaja, W/o. S. Venkateswarlu, R/o. S2/C/246, Sachivalayanagar, Vanasthalipuram, Hyderabad. 2 V. Anvesh S/o. V. Manikya Rao Being minor rep. by his mother V.L. Subhashini W/o. V. Manikya Rao, R/o. Plot No.275, C.B.I. Colony, Vanasthalipuram, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Rep. by its Registrar, Kukatpally, Hyderabad. 2 The Controller of Examiniations The Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Kukatpally, Hyderabad. 3 The Sree Dattha Institute of Engineering and Science Rep. by Principal Sagar Road, Sheriguda, Ibrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents herein in not permitting the petitioners to appear for the B.Tech 1st year ECE & CSE Examination respectively in the 3rd respondent college as illegal, arbitrary and void ab-initio and consequently direct the respondents to receive the applications of the petitioners by permitting him to appear for the examinations of B.Tech 1st year ECE & CSE Examinations respectively for the academic year 2007-08 in the 3rd respondent college and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.VISHNUVARDHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.K.RATHANGA PANI REDDY The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 11191 OF 2008 ORDER: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and therefore writ petition has become infructuous. 2. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _____________________________ Justice B.Seshasayana Reddy 20th August, 2008 . KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 11191 OF 2008 20th August, 2008.