BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Saturday, the Twelfth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.14699 of 2011 S. MOHANA ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.4 Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, CRIME NO.24/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.MAHESWARAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Addl.Public Prosecutor(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is accused No.4 in Cr.No.24 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for offence punishable under Sections 498A and 506(i) of I.P.C. and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Apprehending arrest, at the hands of the respondent police, the petitioner is before this Court seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of prosecution, the defacto complainant is the wife of the first accused. The petitioner is the sister-in- law of the defacto complainant. The allegation is that she also joined with the husband of the defacto complainant and harassed her. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would deny the above allegations. He would submit that the petitioner has been given in marriage elsewhere and she has been falsely implicated in this case. 4. Having regard to the nature of the allegations and also considering the fact that the allegations are so weak, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on anticipatory bail, with the following conditions: i) the petitioner, in the event of arrest or on her appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Dindigul, should execute https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned: ii) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required. iii) the petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. Sd/- 12/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II DINDIGUL 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT 3 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. R.MAHESWARAN Advocate SR.No.39411 ssk/15.11.2011 /5c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14699 of 2011 Date :12/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/