IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.17713 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 13.01.2010 Bhajan Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.V.K.Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.B.S.Chahal, DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks quashing of the orders dated 13.11.2007 (Annexure P-3), 31.12.2007 (Annexure P-4) and 3.4.2008 (Annexure P-5) passed by the respondents, whereby his retiral benefits have been with- held on account of refixation of his pay, done after the petitioner's retirement on attaining the age of superannuation on 28.2.2006. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties agree that the controversy involved in this case stands settled by the decision dated 27.5.2009 rendered by this Court in a bunch of writ petitions including CWP No.5568 of 2008 (Charan Dass and others C.W.P.No .17713 of 2009 (O&M) 2 versus State of Punjab and others). The writ petition is accordingly allowed in terms of the afore- stated decision of this Court in CWP No.5568 of 2008 (Charan Dass and others versus State of Punjab and others). Dasti. 13-01-2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE