IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 647 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 647 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 647 OF 2006 Shri Subedar Rambaj Yadav. ... Petitioner. V/s. Mr.Narsajah Sambajah Eligeti and others. ... Respondents. WITH WITH WITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 651 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 651 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 651 OF 2006 Shri Dayaram Rajbali Yadav. ... Petitioner. V/s. Mr.Narsajah Sambajah Eligeti and others. ... Respondents. Y.M.Pendse for the petitioner. None for the respondents. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 27th March 2006. DATED: 27th March 2006. DATED: 27th March 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. No case is made out to interfere with the impugned order. As a matter fact the applications itself were not maintainable under section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. It was beyond the comprehension that anybody can work for all 365 days without taking any leave. Prima facie; claim set up by the petitioners seems to be unjust claim. 3. Petition is, thus, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. 4. Needless to mention that in the event dispute is raised before proper forum, this order of dismissal shall not come in the way of the petitioners. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)