IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE TUESDAY, THE 11TH DECEMBER 2007 / 20TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 WP(C).No. 23594 of 2007(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ M.HASSAN KANNU, S/O. ABDULKAREEM, AGED 49 YEARS, BAITHUL BARKA, PPIV/482, POOVAR P.O., AND AT PRESENT RESIDING AT PLOT NO.15, INDIRA NAGAR, PEROORKKADA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.B.SATHIQ SRI.C.ANIRUDHAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, POOVAR GRAMA PANCHAYAT, POOVAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. MANJU P.K., D/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, KAMALA BHAVAN, POOVAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP SRI.V.VIJULAL SRI.DILEEP P.PILLAI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.23594/2007 APPENDIX EXT.P1: COPY OF COMPLAINT DATED 13.11.2006 EXT.P2: COPY OF RECEIPT DATED 13.11.2006 EXT.P3: COPY OF STOP MEMO DATED 15.11.2006 EXT.P4: COPY OF FINAL ORDER DATED 7.3.2007 /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ---------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 23594 OF 2007 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of December , 2007 JUDGMENT The grievance of the petitioner is that the first respondent Panchayat has not implemented Ext.P4 final order which has been passed against the 2rd respondent. The learned counsel for the 2nd respondent seeks time to file counter affidavit. He, however does not submit that Ext.P4 has been challenged yet. If remedy by way of appeal is available to the 2nd respondent against Ext.P4, it is open to the 2nd respondent to invoke that remedy. I dispose of this writ petition directing the first respondent to implement Ext.P4 in accordance with law after one month of receiving a copy of this judgment. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. dpk