^B^ICE ^ I^RiiJ^1^ %3?'6'~H IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGAR MISELLANEOUS APPEAL (C) N0. - l ' "" ^ OF2f (MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988) APFELLANT NON APPLICANT No.-l NON-CLAIMANT Satpal Singh Chawla S/o Niranjan Singh Chawla, aged about 28 years, R/o- Station Para, Mahasamund, District - Mahasamund (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS CLAIMANTS APPLICANTS ^^••- i.^0-"".'.. <;*,>.«''•'•'•"". -^.••••" ^w^^^'" NONAPPLICANT No.-2 NON-CLAIMANT RESPONDENT Minor Ku, Nandini Vishwakarma D/o Late Baba Ram Vishwakarma.aged about 15 Years ^ Smt. Ishwari Bai Vishwakarma W/o Basant Lal Vishwakarma, aged about 25 ^ years, [Respondent/Claimant No. 1 being minor on behalf ofthrough her legal guardian sister Smt. Ishwari Bai Vishwakarma] Both R/o- Imlibhata, Mahasamund, District - Mahasamund (C.G.) Present R/o - Village - Jamgaon, Police Station - Fingeshwar, District - Raipur (C.G.) Duryodhan Prasad Yadav S/o Gajen Das Yadav, R/o- Village - Pitiyajhar, Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) Appeal Value at - Rs. 1,62,000/- MEMORANDUMOF APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 y' ^N HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR APPELLANT RESPONDENTS M.A.(C) No. 1561/2008 Satpal Singh Chawla Versus Minor Ku. Nandini Vishwakarma and another SB:- HON'BLE SHRI N.K. AGARWAL, J PRESENT:- None for the appellants. O RA L O R D E^ (18-2-2011) 1. Case is catled twice. Even then none appears for the appellants. 2. In the circumstances, this Court is left with no option but to disraiss the appeal. 3. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed foi non-prosecution. ^.K. A8ra' Judge ?/