IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA. CWP No.: 10991 of 2011-J. Decided on: 15.12.2011. Govind Ram son of late Shri Niru Ram, resident of village Tikka Panted, Post Office Galian, Tehsil and District Kangra, H.P. … Petitioner. Versus 1. State of Himachal Pradesh through Principal Secretary (Forests) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla. 2. Divisional Forest Officer, Palampur Forest Division, Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. 3. The Senior Deputy Accountant General (A&E), Himachal Pradesh, Shimla – 171 003. … Respondents. _____________________________________________ Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. _____________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Dutt Vasudeva, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J. K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General for respondent No.1 and 2. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India for respondent No.3. ____________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral ) The petitioner claims the benefit of the decision of the Supreme Court in Mool Raj Upadhyaya Vs. State of H.P., 1994 Supp. (2) SCC 316 and claims work charge status on completion of ten years of daily waged service with 240 days per year. In any case, as rightly pointed out by the learned Deputy Advocate General, there cannot be work charge status prior to 1.1.1994. The claim of regularization will be considered only subject to the availability of vacancies. All these aspects, the petitioner pray, he may be permitted to bring to the notice of the 2nd respondent/competent authority. It is open to him to do so. In the event of the petitioner filing appropriate representation furnishing his service particulars, the matter will be considered and appropriate action will be taken in accordance with law within four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment alongwith the representation by the petitioner before the 2nd respondent/competent authority. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice (Justice Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 15, 2011. (sck/hl).