IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 10559 of 2008 Decided on: 29.12.2010 Gurdev Singh …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. no For the petitioner : Ms. Salochna Kaundal, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Petitioner has made a representation to the Superintending Engineer, I & PH Circle, Sundernagar for the redressal of his grievance vide Annexure-A5, dated 18.9.2002. However, the same has not been decided till date. 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the Superintending Engineer, I& PH Circle, Sundernagar to decide the representation of the petitioner by passing a speaking order, within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 29, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No