IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3782 of 2011 Pulkit Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 2. 20.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has approached this Court only for a direction upon the respondents to correct the error that has crept in the letter dated 28.2.2006 issued by the University, by which the petitioner has been absorbed as Assistant, although the petitioner claims to have been appointed as Store-keeper on 20.7.1979 in Parwati Science College, Madhepura. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has also found a place in the report of Justice S.C. Agrawal Commission as Store Keeper. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner has filed several representations before the authorities of the University and lastly on 23.5.2007, but the authorities are sitting tight over the matter and not taking any action. 2 In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the writ application is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Vice- Chancellor of B.N. Mandal University with all relevant documents in support of his stand within four weeks from today along with a copy of this order and the Vice- Chancellor shall consider and dispose of the same within a further period of three months from the date of filing of the said representation. In case the claim of the petitioner is rejected, the same must be done by passing a speaking order. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.)