IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 905 of 1987 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA and HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- RITA HUKU KARAMCHANDANI Versus AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPN. -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: PARTY-IN-PERSON for Petitioner No. 1 NOTICE SERVED for Petitioner No. 1 MR SI NANAVATI for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA and HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Date of decision: 11/05/2005 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA) This is a petition of 1987 which was filed by the petitioner as party-in-person. When it was placed before this court on 09th March, 2005, notice was sent to the petitioner to either remain personally present before this court or through her Power of Attorney or through any one else for hearing of this petition today on 11th May, 2005. Though duly served, no one is present before this court when this matter was called out today at about 3.15 p.m.. In that view of the matter, we have no option but to dismiss the petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Rule discharged. ( B.J. Shethna, J. ) ( M.C. Patel, J. ) hki