IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRIMINAL MISC. No.19127-M of 2010 DATE OF DECISION : SEPTEMBER 23, 2010 BRAHM KUMAR ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. GS Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Reeta Kohli, Addl.AG, Punjab. Mr. Yogesh Goel, Advocate, for the complainant. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1. This petition under Section 439, Code of Criminal Procedure, has been filed for bail in FIR No.195 dated 2.11.2009 under Sections 307/506, Indian Penal Code, read with Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, Police Station, Sarabha Nagar, Ludhiana. 2. On the last date of hearing i.e. 23.8.2010, Sanjiv Bhargav (complainant) was directed to be examined. Learned counsel for the complainant has tendered in court the certified copies of the zimny orders, which are taken on record. 3. On 13.9.2010, Sanjiv Bhargav (complainant and injured person) was examined. The said witness has clearly stated that the CRIMINAL MISC. No.19127-M of 2010 2 petitioner fired a shot, which hit on the right lower side of the abdomen and above the right thigh. The cross-examination was deferred on the request of the learned defence counsel. The next date for examining other witnesses is 5.10.2010. 4. Considering the stage of the case and the fact that the injured witness has accused the petitioner of causing a fire arm injury, no ground for bail is made out. 5. The petition is dismissed. September 23, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?