1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.352 OF 2003 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders 1. Heard Advocate Shri A.S. Golegaonkar, Advocate for the applicant. 2. It appears from the age given in the title of the Civil Revision Application itself that the child Firdoz, regarding whose custody present litigation is going on, has not only completed 18 years, but by now he must be about 21 years of age. Similarly, in the application in the lower court, his age was shown to be 3 years as in the year 1993. 3. Considering above aspects and since Firdos has attained the age of 2 majority, this civil revision application against the order passed by Additional District Judge, Latur, in Civil Miscellaneous Application No.55 of 1995 decided on 20.3.1999 does not survive and the same, therefore, is disposed of. Date:06/10/2009 (P.R.BORKAR, J.) pnd/cra352.03