IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.15317 of 1991 Date of Decision.09.09.2011 O.P. Lather, Superintending Engineer, Haryana P.W.D., B&R Branch, Ambala Circle, Ambala Cantt. .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana through Commissioner & Secretary to Govt. Haryana, PWD B&R, Chandigarh and another .....Respondents Present: None for the petitioner. Ms. Kirti Singh, DAG, Haryana. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. By an order dated 17.2.1992, the Court has directed the case to be posted after the disposal in LPA No.830 of 1991. The registry has pointed out that LPA No.830 of 1991 was itself dismissed on 29.01.2002. There is no representation for the petitioner to make out a case as to how the petitioner's case still require consideration in the writ petition. 2. The writ petition is dismissed in default of appearance and non-prosecution. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE September 09, 2011 Pankaj*