FARHAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 225 OF 2005 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders CORAM: K.U. CHANDIWAL J. DATED: 4th May, 2010. P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel. Dismissal of suit by order dated 21.10.1991 was questioned in the first appeal. The learned Principal District Judge by order dated 15.3.1995 found the plaintiffs to be in possession over the suit property except the House No. 452, Gat Nos. 129, 135, which were provenly in possession of defendant No. 1. The First Appellate Court also allowed Marathawada Wakf Board, Aurangabad to deal with the assertion of rights between plaintiffs and defendant No. 1 in accordance with the provisions of law by following due process of law. Thus, the finding of the First Appellate Court is questioned by original plaintiffs. On survey of the findings recorded by the First Appellate Court, I do not see any perversity or error apparent in the observations. Second appeal dismissed. No costs. [ K.U. CHANDIWAL J.] ssc/sa225.05