IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26315 of 2009 1. SUDARSHAN PASWAN @ BHUT 2. Hari Narayan Paswan 3. Ranjit Paswan 4. Lal Babu Paswan Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 26.08.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the prayer of the petitioner nos. 1 and 4, inasmuch as they have been arrested. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as withdrawn against petitioner nos. 1 and 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners along with others have been alleged for causing assault by means of lathi, khanti, rod, bricks and stone. According to the learned counsel, on the eve of Holi two groups clashed but injuries received are simple in nature not justifying refusal of petitioners’ anticipatory bail. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioners no. 2 and 3 is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Bikram P.S. Case No. 44 of 2009, above named petitioners no. 2 and 3 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the 2 like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)