IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN FRIDAY, THE 20TH AUGUST 2010 / 29TH SRAVANA 1932 RP.No. 764 of 2010(K) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.16504/2010 Dated 22/07/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ADDL.3RD RESPONDENT ----------------------------------------- M.N.MADHUSOODHANAN NAMBOODIRI, MELSANTHI, PADANAYARKULANGARA SREE MAHADEVA TEMPLE, PADANAYARKULANGARA, KARUNAGAPPALLY GROUP, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, RESIDING AT KRIPA BHAVAN, PADANAYARKULANGARA NORTH, KARUNAGAPPALLY. BY ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP SRI.V.VIJULAL RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 --------------------------------------------- 1. PADANAYARKULANGARA SHREE MAHADEVA KSHETHROPAKADESAKA SAMITHY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, S.PRAHALADAN, S/O.SANKUNNY, CHIRAKKADA HOUSE, PADA NORTH, KARUNAGAPPALLY. 2. TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, REPRESENTED BY THE DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER, DEVASWOM BOARD JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, PADANAYARKULANGARA DEVASWOM, KARUNAGAPPALLY. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, & P.S. GOPINATHAN, JJ. -------------------------------------------- R. P. No. 764 of 2010 in WP.C. No. 16504 of 2010 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of August, 2010 O R D E R Ramachandran Nair, J. Review Petition appears to be filed under the impression that this Court vide judgment in the WPC concluded that review petitioner has siphoned off the amount from Vazhipadu for his own benefit. We make it clear that we have only narrated the allegations of the Devaswom and the inference drawn by them and those are not findings on the review petitioner. Judgment stands clarified as above, but operative portion of the judgment will remain unaltered. R.P.is disposed of as above. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) Judge. kk (P.S. GOPINATHAN) Judge. 2