1 appw25.11 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.25 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2564 OF 2010 Mohanlal G. Talreja. ....Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ....Respondents Mr. Subhash Jha i/b. Law Juris, advocate for applicant. Mr. J.P.Yagnik, APP for State. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED:- JANUARY 24, 2011. P.C. 1. Leave to amend to mention the correct writ petition number, as prayed for is granted. Amendment be carried out forthwith. 2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, even though the same cannot be said to be sufficient cause, but the litigant should not suffer for the mistake of the advocate, by way of indulgence, in the interest of justice, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 3. The restored Writ Petition shall proceed. Issue notice to newly added 2 appw25.11 respondent Nos. 2 to 5 returnable on 18th February, 2011. 4. Learned APP on instruction states that the Petitioner is not cooperating in the pending investigation. This factual position is disputed by the Counsel for the Petitioner. Without prejudice, the Petitioner through Counsel assures that he would extend full cooperation to the Investigating Officer as and when required. That assurance is accepted. (A.R.JOSHI, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)