IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42513 of 2009 SUNIL YADAV, S/o Late Makhu Yadav. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 27.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. By an earlier order dated 17.09.2009 vide Cr. Misc. No. 24763 of 2009 the petitioner, Sunil Yadav had been granted bail noting the fact that the petitioner was an accused in only one other case which related to the kidnapping of his own wife which fact was to be verified by the Magistrate concerned. On verification it was found that the petitioner no doubt was an accused in only one other case but it did not relate to the kidnapping of his own wife but it was a case of simple theft, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Naugachia, Bhagalpur in - 2 - connection with Gopalpur (Rangra) P.S. Case No. 77 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)