IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH AUGUST 2008 / 5TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 25722 of 2008(K) -------------------------- (I.A.NO.932 OF 2008 IN O.S.NO.508 OF 2007 OF MUNSIFF COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA) PETITIONER: ------------ 1. ALEY, AGED 83, D/O.ULAHANNAN, SOURYAMMACKAL HOUSE, KAVANA KARA, MUVATTUPUZHA. 2. ANNAKUTTY, AGED 77, D/O. OUSEPH, SOURYAMMACKAL HOUSE, KAVANA KARA, MUVATTUPUZHA. 3. JOSE, AGED 64, S/O.,THOMAS SOURYAMMACKAL HOUSE, KAVANA KARA, MUVATTUPUZHA. 4. JAILS, AGED 44, S/O.THOMAS SOURYAMMACKAL HOUSE, KAVANA KARA, MUVATTUPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.P.N.RAMAKRISHNAN NAIR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. CHACKALACKAL JOSEPH FRANCIS AGED 55, S/O.JOSEPH, CHAKKIPARACKAL HOUSE KAVANA KARA, MUVATTUPUZHA VILLAGE. 2. C.J.VINCENT, AGED 48, S/O.CHACKALACKAL JOSEPH FRANCIS, CHAKKIPARACKAL HOUSE,KAVANA KARA, MUVATTUPUZHA VILLAGE. 3. MATHAI, AGED 48, S/O.JOHN, KACHARAYIL HOUSE, VAZHAKKULAM KARA, MANJALLOOR VILLAGE, MUVATTUPUZHA. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.25722 of 2008 ------------------------------- Dated this the 27th August, 2008. J U D G M E N T This petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging Ext.P4 order passed by Munsiff Court, Muvattupuzha, in I.A.No.932 of 2008 in O.S.No.508 of 2007, an application filed for permission to withdraw the suit with liberty to file a fresh suit. That petition was dismissed under Ext.P4 order on 14.3.2008. On the same day, under Ext.P5 order, learned Munsiff rejected the plaint holding that petitioner did not comply with the order passed on 7.3.2008. When suit itself stands rejected, petitioner is not entitled to challenge Ext.P4 order without, challenging Ext.P5 order. Ext.P5 order is to be varied either by filing an application for review or a regular second appeal. With liberty to the petitioner to file the same, the writ petition is dismissed. If the petitioner is entitled to file a separate suit, he is at liberty to do so. M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE nj.