1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6417/2009 Ram Karan. vs. Director, Central Cattle Breeding Farm, Suratgarh and another. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6417/2009 Ram Karan. vs. Director, Central Cattle Breeding Farm, Suratgarh and another. Date : 13.7.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.JK Mishra, for the petitioner. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner's services were terminated from 12.9.1988. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner approached the Central Administrative Tribunal and from where, when direction was given to raise industrial dispute, then the petitioner approached the competent authority for referring the matter to the Labour Court, Bikaner, then the dispute was 2 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6417/2009 Ram Karan. vs. Director, Central Cattle Breeding Farm, Suratgarh and another. referred on 19.12.2001. The petitioner failed to submit his claim before the Labour Court and the petitioner's representative submitted that they do not want to pursue the matter, then the claim of the petitioner was dismissed vide order dated 19.4.2002 but this fact came to the knowledge of the petitioner, as per the petitioner himself, in the year 2003, then he submitted an application for recalling of the order dated 19.4.2002. However, the petitioner's said application was dismissed by the Labour Court vide order dated 14.5.2004. Then the petitioner approached this Court by preferring writ petition on 27.4.2006 i.e. After more than two years from the date of rejection of his application by the Labour Court. The writ petition was kept pending in defect side till today and defect was removed only in the month of July, 2009 and then the case has been listed in the Court. The petitioner's challenge to the order dated 14.5.2004 by which the Labour Court rejected his application for recalling of the order dated 3 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6417/2009 Ram Karan. vs. Director, Central Cattle Breeding Farm, Suratgarh and another. 19.4.2002 cannot be entertained in the facts and circumstances referred above and this is nothing but a luxury litigation and, therefore, this writ petition filed by the petitioner is dismissed on the ground of delay and laches. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya