IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42353 of 2008 Vijay Sao & Ors Versus State Of Bihar & Anr ----------- For the petitioner—Mr. Durgesh Nandan For the OP--- Mr. Gauri Shankar Prasad. For the State ---- Mr. Matloob Rab 03 17.10.2011 This application under Section 498A, Cr. P.C is directed for quashing the order dated 27.2.2007 passed by the S.D.J.M Nawadah in Complaint Case no. 289/2006 whereby accused named in complaint petition including the petitioners have been summoned, on inquiry, finding the prima facie case under Section 498A of the I.P.C. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the petitioner No. 1 is father- in-law and other petitioner happens to be dewars and have been falsely implicated in this case only with view to harass due to filing the matrimonial (Divorce) case No.116/05 by petitioner No. 2 Vishwanath Gautam husband of OP No. 2 on 22.11.05. On going through the complaint petition it appears that there is allegation against the petitioners to torture the Complainant OP No. 2. The learned S.D.J.M on going through the complaint petition, S.A of the Complainant OP 2 no. 2 and statements of the witnesses, examined in course of inquiry, come to conclusion that prima facie case is made out under Section 498A I.P.C and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. As such the impugned order does not suffer from illegality for interference in inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Accordingly this application is dismissed. Namita ( Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.)