c ^ .,\6 ^ ingWies s IN THE HOINABLE mGHGOURTOEJIjMGAl'IJKEOPr'HHAtTISGARHATBniASEUR.C.G, :W.P.!No.;.................IO%.a^.....;.2BO^' :"'<:"' : .'• ' : .: ':., 'T ^ ^sM \k.M-^yv'~'. .^A-^^-t^ .^•^'{^^ ....•-""".n' ^ ^y1~' ..^•^"^-' ^' »' v^"^ '^-^0 t Q:: 2- PETmONER..;....,.; ..^..^».?Ai3imsjnga^^^^a]csson;oiFlateShn^% ^rFlialEur,;AssistSnt;1'^aclier'(^i^an),. :.' ^ .::'^(>vt(iNa^it|i|igMs|l]^i,T And Bisti(icta)uis'(G^S) Respondent .............. ^t tj~f'»si ^ fersus''\''''\' •ii ' ': ~ l.The^StateGovemmentiOrClili&ttishgarll. Thi'ougIlStl]ie|EommissM)n|er,'Seliool ;^EducatiUn,;Mihistry, ? 1 IIl.K.S.,Bha'rah,iRaipur(C.G.) ^|%» ^.TheDistnct|EaucatunpfHcer,Dul^(C^ ^5»p?'t . .x:' 1; .''1^':'- ^^::<.i' :'':i: : ri:l''';': :';:^ WritPetitionmdeEJ^icieSi22g^ QKiEhe(Ec)nStituti0&.Qf]iniiiB. ThepetiUoDerrespectfuUyfurnisIiesthe.iiai'ticularsoEthewritpetitignas. ti' ^:';fil m ,S1 llli liiffi « XI-HC-22 sn^T^r f^iwsn^r SbHRitffer •^sW^r &./11^ lfcj<vx^ \xl 7^< ^ 3^ ^WM^, W^WW, Rldlti^ _.^P-AJ6-:^24^0$' *II*<CTI snii'n """"""""""" W]' 200 {^3:""""" """"•"" 1'i ..! 3<1^16«IIW(rficT 13-12-2005 Shri Ajay Shrivastava, coi Slm Sandeep Dubey, Goi Heard. Counsel for the pedtionf 1999/19tb April 1999, the petitii: further subinitted that one higfaer (nsel for the petitioner. ft. Adv. forthe State. Ir submits that as per Annexure P-1 dated 17 March| |ner is entitled for two additional higher pay scales. Hij fay scale has been given to liim but second has not beea) asvsn. Leamed State Couiisel s fileremm. Counsel for fhe petitioue: (ibmits that retum has not been filed. He wants time t<^ submits thatfor fhe presentilie petitioner may be give^ an opportunit}' to file the detail^d representation before the competent authority' of th^ respondents, whieh will be c6nsi41 The prayer is not opposs4 in the opinion of this Court, en| petitioner to make a detailed rej authority of fbe respondents alo( weeks from-tBday and on such t respondents shaU decide thesait possible preferably wifhin six spectfyins the @'oimd on wllich remains, the petitioner may avail TOth the aforesaid obsenl. Certified copy as per rulej tiwfM'fl-f iw!tT¥tet^<Ri+<;i< ^3[)^IT3II^T ered aad decided in accordance with law. by fhe ofher side. Having considered and ((ithout expressing any opinion on the merits of the casej |ls ofjustice wiB be served if a direcrion is given to th4 liresenfation raising liis gtieyanc.es before the competent |ig vvith a copy of the petition and fhis order within tn-c ipresentation being ffled, the eompetent authorit^' of th^ le on its own merits in accordance with law as eariy ai ^eeks from fhe date of receipt of the representatiori the order is passed. It is made clear that if anv grievance ^he remedy avaUable under the law. [ tatmns.this petition stands disposed of j Consequently, I.A. No. ^248/2005 stands'disposed of. Sd/- .^^- Fakhruddm Judge 1 i 1