HIGH CQUR’I‘ 011‘ CHEATTISGARH, BILA$P§3R Cr.$. No. 293 @f 206.33 AéPELLANT Sudama Prasad Sg’o Ram Pz‘asad, ag€d § about 35 ysars, Rio Daltal1ga11j, P‘S. i Navatqh', Jharkhazm. Stats cf Chhattisgarh, Through RS, Sukma, Distt. Damtswada, (CfGI) ‘ Amx§$ under Section 374- (23 0f Cod§e of Crimmai maceéwe Aggsaranc': E - Vei‘s uS RE$?GNDENT Sh‘m' mm. Shanda, Pazia Laxwcr for the State. a §§i£§L $R3EI§ §15£L20Q8y SUNEL KUMAR SEEEIA, J. This appeal has 136611 salt by appdlani— Suciama Prasad S/o Ram Prasad from Central Jail, Surguja, Ambikapur against the judgmsnt of conviction aac’i order of sentonco datoti 5. 1Q.2001 passsd in Special Case No. 27/2001 by the Special Judge, N.D.P.S. Act, Bastar, Jagdalpur. This appeal was received by the Reglsiry ofthis High Court on 28.2.2003. A perusal of the appeal as well as the records of C11'mi11al Appeal No. 1011f2001 would Show that earlier to this appeal (CLA. No. 293/2003), the aforesaicl appeal No. 1011,12001 was aheady flled on behalf of the appellaht gaudama Prasad and other (to—accused persons before this Court 011 18.1G2001 and m that appeal, the jail sentence of the appellant was also suspemied on 6.2.2002. Therefore, 3‘11 View of the above, this appeal being ”subsequent is unnecessary and the same cannot he admitted for hearhig. The appeal is dismissed being subsequent and unnecessaiy appeal. Sdl_ Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge