CWP No. 5633/2001 6.5.2011 Present: Mr. Ajay Mohan Goel, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 3. We have gone through the entire petition. The main claim of the petitioner-company is that they should be granted police protection. After hearing the matter for some time Mr. Ajay Mohan Goel, learned counsel for petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty reserved to petitioner- company to approach the District Magistrate to take action under Section 16 of the Indian Telegraph Act 1885 in terms of the law laid-down in C.W.P No. 5635 of 2010 titled as Anoop Mehta & others versus Jaypee Power Grid Limited & others decided on 24-12-2010. The petitioners while filing an application before the District Magistrate for action under Section 16 of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 must given specific instances and thereafter District Magistrate shall exercise his jurisdiction in accordance with law. In case there is dispute with regard to compensation, it can be referred to the learned District Judge, Kinnaur at Rampur in terms of Section 18 not only at the instance of claimant but also at the instance of the company. Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. No costs. (Deepak Gupta), Judge. May 6, 2011 (Sanjay Karol),Judge. (priti)