{X v^<^L-- BEFORE THE HON'BLE HFGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.g.No. Q-\ / 2DO^/ ^^^•^^^3 Petitioner - Pyarelal ihobia aged 58 years, S/o Bhulau lal l^hobia, / Retired Asstt.Sub-lnspector (M) llth E^ttalian Bhilai, Tahsil and Distt. IJUB^. ^ Versus. Respondents -(1) The State Govt.of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary Home Department ^£| D.K.S. Bhawan, RAIPUR. <f ^: .^ ^ ,\%x/ ^^ $2) Depu-fcylQspectorGffieralCAdsin.) Police Head Quarter, RAIPUR. ^^ /•^) ^•:^Y ( 5 ) C&mmaRdant,_ )w Fst ^_ llth/Batalllon Special Araed Force, Bhilai. .-^ (4) Accouatant General Accounts & Hakdari Deptt. Pagaria COmplex, Near Bus Stand, pmmm : RAIPU!S. ^' _^" WRIT PETITION UNDER ART. 226/227' OF THE CONSII lUTTON /A DF INDIA. l'y ^ ^ .'n;-^^TZ-^-.<^' S£ ?p^ XI-HC-22 ^TT^T^T f^rww^T $FW^^Tf^" 3^ ^qWf^T, i9€tWIS", teTRT^C OT^T^W .gp^^.-.l0,-. (VICI^J.JI?5.^ N'l^fW^WW l^^w.., 3?T^T ^<TTW ^rf^T 13/04/2005: - On a mention being mad< Shri Ajay Shrivastava, les Shri Sanjay S. State/respondents No.1, 2 & 3. Shri R.S. BhageJ, The petitioner who was Battaiion, Bhi'lai sought after completing continuous that his salary has npt been 13.02.2001 andG.P.F.amountl Leamed counsel circumstances, submitted that detailed representation to salary and also to make a payment of G.P.F., within two to decide the representations,| appearing for the respondents Having heard Jearned having regardto the facts and is allowed to make representatit raising his grievances, within a| respondents No.1 & 4 are within another three montht t, the case is taken up for hearing. rned counsel for the petitioner. Agra^l, tearned Panel Lawyer, for the iearne^counse! for respondent No.4. <^l^f^1<fl;T^IH<rti ^te^^'^s^ ^"3rf^TW^T ^^y^^ -;.'^.'F^ retirentent selvices fi)^d aprtearing ine respohdent vforking as Assistant Sub tnspector in 11 on medical ground on 09.03.2001 of 36 years and his grievance is as per the order of the tribunal dated (ias also not been paid. for the petitioner, in the petitioner may be allowed to make a No.1 regarding non-payment of his Irepresentation to respondent No.4 for v^eeks and respondents 1 & 4 be directed respectively, to which learned counsel no objection. ;ounsel appearing for the parties and lcircumstances of the c-ase, the petitioner t>ns to respondents No.1 & 4 respectively period of two weeks from today, in turn, to consider and decide the same from the date of receipt of the hfeve dirbcted XI-HC-22 3:n^T^F)T Rpt^3TI^T ^rioF^fgcT ^ ^ E>a^^/^ y/ '^yyy t)y ^I^C^I ^^l(ch 3^r ^i^i^^, ^Tn<-i^i<$, fct^Kiy 3l«^|M5i<h —V):F;..<^&:. .&L}.l PJ 200 W^T^Rn'W^cT With the direction aforesa] Consequently, M.(W.)P. chi^f<n41vi ^i^^T^teI:$Ft<Ri^i< ^3:rf^T3T1^T representations in an objective r|r»annerconsidering the grievances ofthe petitioner, m accordance with lav^. d, the petition stands disposed of. ^0.5167 of 2004 and I.A. Nos.44 of 2004 & 9719 of 2004 also stand dispojsed of. •ceiltified. Parties are entitled for ceiltified copy bf this order. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge (^y^)