IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No.13743 of 2008 Date of decision: 5.8.2008 Smt. Rajni Saini. -----Petitioner. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. -----Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present:- Mr. R.S. Malik, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Yashdeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. ---- ORDER: The petitioner and respondent No.5 were candidates for the post of lecturer in Physical Education. Respondent No.5 has been selected. According to criteria, Annexure P-1, marks could be allocated for teaching experience and according to the petitioner, respondent No.5 was allocated 10 marks though as per certificate, Annexure P-5, her experience was 3½ years. The petitioner secured 52.28 marks while respondent No.5 was awarded 53.28 marks. If instead of 10 marks, respondent No.5 was granted only 8 marks, respondent No.5 could not have been selected. C.W.P. No.13743 of 2008 We are of the view that it will be appropriate to direct respondents No.2, who is said to be the approving authority for the appointment, to take a decision in accordance with law on the grievance of the petitioner by passing a speaking order within one month of making of a representation. The petition is disposed of. ( ADARSH KUMAR GOEL ) JUDGE August 05, 2008 ( RAKESH KUMAR GARG ) ashwani JUDGE 2