IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10920 of 2009 BINAY KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- Cr.Misc. No.12010 of 2009 MAINULLAH @ DHALO @ MAINULLAH DEVAN @ BHOLA MIAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, for the State and for the Informant. The petitioners are in custody in a Police case under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Penal Code. While the petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 10920 of 2009 is named, that of the petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 12010 of 2009 has transpired during investigation. The submission on behalf of the petitioners is of false implication. The allegations in the first information report have been corroborated during investigation. The materials in the case diary noticed in the impugned order of rejection in Cr. Misc. No. 10920 of 2009 is that the dead body of the son of the informant was found in a water hyacinth near the shop of the petitioner of Cr. Misc. No. 10920 of 2009. There was blood stain in front of the shop. When the shop was opened, fresh blood stains were found in the shop including the sign of having cleaned them up. The button of the trouser of the deceased has also been found inside the shop. In so far as the petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 12010 of 2 2009 is concerned, the allegation against him is of conspiracy in the crime, when sharp cutting weapon was recovered from the room taken by him on rent. Post-mortem report is also that death was caused by sharp cutting weapon This Court is not persuaded to grant bail to the petitioners. The application is rejected. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)