IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 14134 of 2008. Decided on: 16.3.2011 Savitri & another ….Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & others. ....Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 & 2. Mr. V.D. Khidtta, Advocate for respondents No. 3 & 4. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Ms. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge March 16, 2011. (hl) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.