IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5486 of 2009 Date of Decision : 26.10.2009 Vijay Kumar Gupta .....Petitioner versus Smt.Swaraj Kaur .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.K.S.Rekhi, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 10.8.2009 passed by the Rent Controller, Amritsar, whereby an application moved by the tenant-petitioner for appointment of a Local Commissioner, has been dismissed. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. The Rent Controller has rightly observed that the question, as to whether there is one shop or two shops of different sizes, is a question of fact, to be proved by the parties by leading their respective evidence. Dismissed. 26-10-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE