IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH JUNE 2010 / 19TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 17880 of 2010(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M.P. IDIKKULA, MANGALATH, MUTHUKKATTUKARA, NOORANAD.P.O, MAVELIKKARA. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE(PERUMPALLIKUTTIYIL) SRI.A.R.DILEEP SRI.V.SUNIL KUMAR SRI.JASHAR HAMID RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA. 2. THAHSILDAR, MAVELIKKARA. 3. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD ROADS SUB DIVISION, MAVELIKKARA. 4. GOPALAN, PUTHUVEETTIL, THATHAMUNNA, NOORANAD.P.O, MAVELIKKARA. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 17880 of 2010 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 9th day of June, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the 4th respondent in encroaching into Government land, which is in front of the petitioner's shop room. Therefore, the petitioner has filed Ext. P3 petition before the 3rd respondent to initiate proceedings under the Kerala Land Conservancy Act. The petitioner's grievance in this writ petition is that the 3rd respondent is not taking any action on the same. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P3, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and 4th respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.