IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 6615 of 1996. Date of Decision: 8.5.2009. Ex. Constable Ranjit Singh --Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Kamal Dip Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Charu Tuli, Sr. DAG, Punjab. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Pursuant to the order dated 27.3.2009 Ms. Tuli has reported that the FIR registered against the petitioner stands cancelled. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 8.3.1994 (Annexure P-6) whereby his services were terminated by dispensing with the enquiry. The petitioner had earlier filed C.M No. 15536 of 2008 for disposal of this writ petition in the light of the judgement dated 5.12.2007 titled as Baljit Singh, Ex-Constable Vs. SSP, Amritsar. From the perusal of the judgement, it is evident that the present petition is squarely covered by the aforesaid judgment in which following observations have been made:- “ For the reasons recorded hereinbefore, the writ petition is accepted with no order as to costs, and the order of dismissal dated 14.12.1988 (Annexure P-2) is quashed. The respondent is directed to reinstate the petitioner into service and compute the consequential monetary benefits flowing from the quashing of he aforesaid order as per the relevant CWP. No. 6615 of 1996. -2- rules, and pay the same to him, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the judgement. The respondent shall, however, be competent to hold a regular departmental enquiry as per the relevant rules, in relation to the allegations, referred to hereinbefore, and take further action in accordance with law.” This petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the aforesaid judgement. Petitioner shall be entitled to all benefits as have been granted in the aforesaid judgement. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 8.5.2009 lucky