HJGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PEZIT1QNER RESPONDENTS "^ W.P.(CiNo.163of2010 Pradeep Dubey S/o Gaya Prasad Dubey, aged about 43 years, R/o. Village Peeparkhunti, P.S. Gaurella, Tahsil- Pendra Road, District- Biiaspur (C.G.) Versus 1. Chhattisgarh State of Elsction Commission, Through Chief Election Commissioner, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Election Officer/Coilector, Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. Assistant Electioh Officer, Pendra Road, District- Bilaspur (C.G,) 4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Gaurella, District- Bilaspur 5. Returning Officer, Panchayat Gaurella, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) (Wrjt Petition_underArtjcIe 226 ofthe Con^tjtytion of India) Mr. F.S. Khare, Advecate for the petitioner. Mr. Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate, for the State/respondents 2 & 3 on acjvance copy. ORAL ORDER (13.01.2010) SUNILKUMARSIIMHA.J. •N The petitioner has filed this petition for the following re!ief(s):- "10. RELIEFSOUGHT: A. That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned order dated 09.01.2010 and may kindly be pleased to direct the respoodent no,5 to declare the nomination form ofthe petitioner isvalid. B. That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records reiating to the petitioners' matter,for the kind perusa! of this Hon'ble Court. C. Any other reiief, which the Hon'bte Court deem fit and proper, may kindiy be granted in favour of the petitioner." Viln' S- W.P.(C)No. 163/2010 '^ The petitioner,thus, in substance, is praying for quashmentof the order dafed 9.1.2010 passed by respondent No.5 by which the nomination of the petitioner for election tq the post of member Janpad Panchayat has been In view of the provisions of Election Law, this writ petition would not be mainteinable. Accordingiy, W.P.(C) No. 163/2010, filed by the petitioner against the rejection of his nomination by respondent No.5, is dismissed at the motion stage itself. n Sd/- Synil Kumar Sinha Judge .?>. a;"" 1iiii