1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1156 OF 2009 Shri Jingonda Patil & Ors. ..Petitioners. V/s. Shri Shrikant Shankar Jadhav & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.Umesh R. Mankapure for petitioners. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : FEBRUARY 11, 2009. DATE : FEBRUARY 11, 2009. DATE : FEBRUARY 11, 2009. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard Counsel for the Petitioners. 2. No interference is warranted in exercise of writ jurisdiction in respect of discretionary order passed by the Court below. The argument of the Petitioners that the documents produced alongwith the Application Exh. 103 have been taken on record as proved documents, is misplaced. The said order only permits the defendants to produce relevant documents. The fact as to whether existence of the said documents is proved or contents thereof have been proved in evidence is a matter, to be decided at the appropriate stage. Even if the grievance of the Petitioners that the Application Exh. 103 is untenable, as no disclosure is made as to under which 2 provision the same has to be filed, may be right, even so that grievance can be made by the Petitioner in the appeal, to be filed against the final order, if the same was to be adverse against the Petitioners. All questions in that behalf are left open. 3. Petition disposed of on the above terms. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J)