1 C.A.No.11694 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11694 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1046 OF 2011 Mandabai Kautik Patil (died), L.Rs. Himmat Kautik Patil & ors ..Applicants Versus The Divisional Officer, MIDC, Nashik & ors. ..Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11695 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1049 OF 2011 Yasin Natthu Maole, (died), L.Rs. Mohammad Shafi Yasin Patel & anr ..Applicants Versus The Divisional Officer, MIDC, Nashik & ors. ..Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11696 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1054 OF 2011 Bhaiyya Hiraji Patel, (died), L.Rs. Khalil Bhaiyya Patel & ors ..Applicants Versus The Divisional Officer, MIDC, Nashik & ors. ..Respondents 2 C.A.No.11694 of 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11697 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1052 OF 2011 Sardar Rajekhan Patel (died), L.Rs. Rashid Sardar Patel & ors. ..Applicants Versus The Divisional Officer, MIDC, Nashik & ors. ..Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11737 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1059 OF 2011 Daga Khandu Koli, died, through Balu Daga Koli & ors. ..Applicants Versus The Divisional Officer, MIDC, Nashik & ors. ..Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11738 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1056 OF 2011 Daulat Ragho Patil (died), through L.Rs. Raghunath Daulat Patil & ors. ..Applicants Versus The Divisional Officer, MIDC, Nashik & ors. ..Respondents 3 C.A.No.11694 of 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11739 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1057 OF 2011 Kokilabai Lahu Choudhari ..Applicant Versus The Divisional Officer, MIDC, Nashik & ors. ..Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11053 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1055 OF 2011 Lakdu Gangu Mali ..Applicant Versus The Divisional Officer, MIDC, Nashik & ors. ..Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11051 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1058 OF 2011 Imtajbi Gulab Patel ..Applicant Versus The Divisional Officer, MIDC, Nashik & ors. ..Respondents Mr Ajeet B. Kale, Advocate for the applicants; Mr S.S. Dande, Advocate for respondent no.1; Mr S.N. Kendre, A.G.P. for respondents no.2 & 3 4 C.A.No.11694 of 2011 CORAM : MRS MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE : 7th October, 2011 PER COURT : Learned Counsel for the applicants submits that near about 87 appeals are filed challenging the award passed by the Reference Court. In 43 appeals this Court has allowed to withdraw the amount of the award deposited by the acquiring body with some conditions. He prays for the similar order for the applications which are listed before the Court today. 2. In these nine appeals, nine applications are made for withdrawal of the amount of the compensation. The order dated 3.9.2011 passed in the connected appeals and the applications is produced before the Court. The similar order is passed in these civil applications also, as follows :- (i) The applicants are allowed to withdraw the 50% amount deposited on furnishing an undertaking on affidavit, stating that in the event the appeals are allowed, then they would deposit the amount in the Court within a period of eight weeks from the date of the judgment of this Court; (ii)Remaining 50% of the amount is allowed to be withdrawn on furnishing a Bank guarantee of any Scheduled Bank (iii)Civil Applications are accordingly disposed of. ( MRS MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) amj/ca11694.11