CRM No. M-10567 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-10567 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 05.05.2011 Nirbhay Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. P.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. K.D. Sachdeva, Addl. A.G., Punjab. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.24 dated 29.1.2010 under Sections 302/323/427/506/148/149 IPC, Police Station Samana, District Patiala. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that no injury is attributed to the petitioner. He has further argued that Karnail Singh was enlarged on bail vide order dated 9.2.2011 and no injury was attributed to Karnail Singh also, therefore, applying principle of parity, petitioner is also entitled to be enlarged on bail. Mr. K.D. Sachdeva, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, on instructions from SI Jagdish Kumar, who is personally present in the Court, has stated that it is correct that no injury has been attributed to the petitioner and similarly situated co-accused Karnail Singh was enlarged on bail. CRM No. M-10567 of 2011 (O&M) -2- Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, petition is allowed. Let petitioner be enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of learned trial Court on furnishing personal bond and two surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned trial Court. (Alok Singh) Judge May 05, 2011 R.S.