1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 642 OF 2011. Jilani s/o Mohiddin Pathan, age major, occup.prisoner, C.N. 5990, r/of Dist.Central Jail, Aurangabad, District Aurangabad. Petitioner versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai. 2. The Deputy Inspector General (Prison), Central Prison, Aurangabad. 3. The Superintendent of Jail, District Central Jail, Aurangabad. Respondents --------- Ms. Zainat M. Surti, Advocate, (appointed) for petitioner. Smt. S.D. Shelke, A.P.P. for the Respondents. Coram: A. H. Joshi and A. R. Joshi, JJ. Date : 25th August 2011. P. C. 1. The petitioner's grievance is that his request for grant of furlough leave has not been decided by the competent authority. 2. We had directed learned A.P.P. to produce the papers. She has tendered the documents which consist of order passed by the Deputy Inspector General (Prison), Aurangabad, in May 2011, itself. 2 3. The order passed by the D.I.G. (Prison), indicates that the surety proposed by the petitioner, himself being involved in criminal case and is a convict, could not be accepted. However, petitioner is given liberty to furnish any other surety which can be accepted. 4. Learned A.P.P. has assured this court that the order passed by D.I.G. (Prison) would be brought to the notice of the petitioner within one week from today, for enabling him to take appropriate steps and propose alternate surety which is acceptable. 5. With these observations, the petition stands disposed of. (A. R. JOSHI, J.) (A.H. JOSHI, J.) pnd/criwp-642.11