IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1539 of 2008 MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 12.9.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court, while the impugned order of the District Judge would need no interference inasmuch as he has rightly proceeded within the strict four corners of law under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure but then it would be advisable for the State to come out with a petition for amalgamating all the eviction suit and title suits because the State is a party in all the suits and it would be always better for the State to contest all of them together to avoid any conflicting orders. Normally, an eviction suit do not have to wait for declaration of a title in a separate suit for title but where all of the parties whether the raiyat or settlee are claiming their right from the State, some claming to be an owner, some claiming to the tenant, it would be in the interest of justice for all such parties to have the cases decided by a common order. This Court however in absence of materials on record and information with regard to all those other cases would therefore, leave the matter with a liberty to the State to take up appropriate steps and the Collector 2 of Bhojpur who will be well advised to examine the matter and if necessary, move the Court for amalgamating all the cases. With the aforementioned observation, this civil revision application is disposed of. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)