... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.890 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.890 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.890 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.720 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.720 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.720 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri R.V.Gupta for the Applicant. Shri A.S.Shitole, A.P.P for the Respondent. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 30, 2006. DATE : NOVEMBER 30, 2006. DATE : NOVEMBER 30, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The Applicant is the accused No.6. The Applicant has been convicted for offences under section 399 read with section 34 and section 402 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The maximum sentence is simple imprisonment for five years. Reliance is placed on order dated 16th November, 2006 passed in Criminal Application No.771 of 2006 in favour of the co-accused. The said co-accused was enlarged on bail mainly on the ground that he was already in custody for a period of three years and ten months. The case of the ... 2 ... Applicant is different. Looking to the material on record, no case is made out for grant of bail. Accordingly, Application is rejected. 2. If Appeal is not heard within a period of one year from today, liberty to the Applicant to apply afresh for grant of bail. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE