IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1765 of 2008 RAVINDRA NATH TRIPATHY, SON OF LATE SHOE KUMAR TRIPATHY, SENIOR INSPECTOR, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA DINS TANK, P.S. TOWN ARRAH, DISTRICT BHOJPUR Versus 1. SURESH KUMAR BANSAL, CHAIRMAN MADHYA BIHAR GRAMIN BANK, MEENA PLAZA, SOUTH OF MUSEUM, PATNA-1. 2. K.C. CHAKRAWARTI, CHAIRMAN, PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, H.O. DELHI. 3. STATE OF BIHAR. ----------- 04. 17.03.2010 In compliance of my order dated 13.5.2008 passed in C.W.J.C. No.4075 of 2005, Annexure-1 the Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank rejected the claim of the petitioner for payment of travelling/diem allowance in the light of the instruction of the Government of India contained in letter dated 20.3.1993, as according to the Bank said instructions have been issued by NABARD and not by the Government of India. Counsel for the petitioner, however, submitted that bare perusal of letter dated 20.3.1993 would indicate that it is under the instruction of the Government of India and the National Industrial Tribunal. Aforesaid aspect of the matter may have to be considered and clarified by this Court while considering the challenge of the petitioner to the order dated 30.6.2008, Annexure-9. With the observation aforesaid, this contempt application is disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)