IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1901 of 2009 MD.NAFIS ALAM . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 03. 27.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Show cause has been filed on behalf of opposite parties. Learned counsel for the State from Annexure-A to the show cause dated 6.4.2010 states that the petitioner has been appointed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of appointment is silent on the aspect of his seniority as directed by the Writ Court. The Writ Court had directed that the petitioner shall be deemed to have been appointed from the date that the appointment was wrongly denied for purposes of seniority. The date is explicit. His seniority has to be reckoned from the date that appointment was denied. It would have been better, if the opposite parties had passed a transparent and clear order instead of leaving omissions. In any event the omission is fulfilled by the order of the Writ Court itself. The contempt proceedings stand disposed. P.K. ( Navin Sinha, J.)