HIGH COURT or cum'rTmGAnH AT 'siLAsPURL Clamp. No. 342 OF 2009- Ami-aram S/o Manshaxam Rawat, aged about 60 yeam, R/o Village Godhihan, Tahsil Samngarh, District Raigarh (C'G'). , J _ _ Amarlal S/o Ganeshram Agrawal, R/o; Village Godhihari, P.H. No. 21, Tahsil Salangarh, District Rajgarh (C.G.). g Dhono @' Bavanbeer S/o Daulat Ram Caste Rawat, Occupation‘Agriculture; Resham S/o ‘Manshaxam, Caste Rawat; Santosh S/o Ganeshmm Caste Agrawal; Kanwal Singh S/o Gageshram, Casté Rawat; , Respondent No. 2 to 4 am R/o Village Godhjhari and respondent NO. S is R/o Village Dalal, Tahsil Samngarh, District Raigarh (C. G.). ‘ E'rflq-xbnmn. VERSUS REsfpoimaEN'l‘-s 9%? This petition is med under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Prooeduxe, 1973 (in short the code) 'against the oxder dated 31/12] 2008 passeii by the Additional Sessions Judge,. Raigar (C.G.) in Criminal Revision N0. 189/2006 aErmmg the Older dated 3/11/2006 passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate; Satangarh in. M?J.C. No. 545/2006 whereby learned I'Sub Divisional Maéistiate, Samngarli has passed preliminaiy cider under Seciion, 145 (1) and also passed: the order of attachment of property under Section 146 of the Code. * W P ; 9 h r Order is chéllengcd on the‘ gmnnd that learned ‘Ad‘ditionalry ' ‘ Sessions Judge has flot considered the case on merits and on the ground of non-compliance of the order of Sub Divisional ' Magistrate, Samngarh by the petitioner, dismissed the revision. Learned counsel for the pen'tioner further submits that Without providing the opportunity of hearing ’to the present petitioner learned Sub Divisional Magistrate, has passed the order of x attachment same is without jun'sdiction. 3.‘ l Order/impugned and order of the Sub Divisional Magisuate has passed preliminary order under Section 145(1) of the Code and has also passed the order for attachment of the property under Section 146 of the Code, Sub Divisional Magistrate is empowered to pass preliminary order on the basis of information received otherwise. The Sub Divisional Magistrate has passed the order on the basis of application hled on behalf of the non4app1icants. Court below has not committed any illegality While passing the order warranting any interference. I do not nnd any force in the petition. Consequently, petition is liable to be dismissed and it is hereby dismissed. I I.A..No. 01. is also dismissed.