IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35952 of 2010 MAINEJAR BAHGAT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 29.09.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of the petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The present application is for misuse of privilege of bail. Initially case was registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, when the petitioner granted bail, but due to his non-appearance the bail bond was cancelled on 17.2.1999. It is submitted that petitioner stayed at Delhi to earn his livelihood. It is further submitted out of four F.I.R. named accused persons three had already died. The impugned order reflects that the charges have not been framed. Considering the aforesaid submission, let the petitioner namely, Mainejar Bhagat be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J. F.T.C.-II, Gopalganj in connection with S. Tr. No. 593 of 1998 arising out of Mirganj P.S. Case no. 121 of 1997. Learned Court below will be at liberty to 2 cancel the bail bond of the petitioner if he fails to appear on two consecutive dates and try to conclude the trial within a period of one year. Anand Kr. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)