IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26917 of 2010 1.SHYAM SUNDAR SHARMA, S/O Kapildeo Sharma 2.CHANAKALI DEVI, W/O Shyam Sunder Sharma 3.JOGINDRA SHARMA, S/O Shyam Sundar Sharma 4.AMITABH SHARMA, S/O Shyam Sundar Sharma 5.RESHMA SHARMA, W/O Jogindra Sharma All Reisent of Village Bank, P.O.+P.S. Akorhi Gola, District Rohtas ……..Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …….Opposite Parties 02/- 17.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the five petitioners and Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners are named accused in this case being in-laws of daughter of the informant in this case, where in husband is not named as accused. There is general allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. besides getting son-in-law of the informant misplaced some where, but that too based on alleged disclosure by daughter of the informant, who for reasons best known did not appear as complainant/informant. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks of receipt of the copy of this order, petitioners, namely, 1.Shyam Sundar Sharma, 2.Chanakali Devi, 3.Jogindra Sharma, 4.Amitabh Sharma and 5.Reshma Sharma, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram, Rohtas in connection with Rohtas 2 P.S. Case No. 70 of 2010, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to petitioner nos. 1, 3 & 4 (being male members), namely, 1.Shyam Sundar Sharma, 3.Jogindra Sharma & 4.Amitabh Sharma to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for one year or till disposal of the case whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, the liberty shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)