IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-11783 of 2009 Date of decision : 30.04.2009 Taruna and another ....Petitioners V/s State of Haryana and others ....Respondents BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Kharb, AAG Haryana. Mr. Raj Mohan Singh, Advocate for respondents No. 5 and 6. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) Petitioners who claim to have married each other seek protection of their life and liberty on the ground that respondents No. 5 and 6, who are parents of petitioner No. 1 do not agree to the marriage and they may harass the petitioners. On this statement notice of motion is issued and on the asking of Court Mr. S.S. Kharb, AAG Haryana accepts notice on behalf of State of Haryana. Mr. Raj Mohan Singh, counsel has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No. 5 and 6. On request of counsel for respondents No. 5 and 6, petitioner No. 1 was allowed to meet her parents i.e respondents No. 5 and 6 and the issue was discussed between them. Counsel for respondents No. 5 and 6 states that there is no threat to life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No. 5 Crl. Misc. No. M-11783 of 2009 -2- and 6. Since the only prayer in this petition is regarding the protection due to threat from respondents No. 5 and 6, in view of the statement of learned counsel for respondents No. 5 and 6, this petition has been rendered infructuous. However, in case petitioners still have some grievance they may approach respondent No. 3, who shall look into the matter and take appropriate action as deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case. Disposed off. 30.04.2009 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE