IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:- THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN THURSDAY, THE 1ST FEBRUARY 2007 / 12TH MAGHA 1928 L.A.APPEAL No.778 of 2005 (D) ----------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.8.2004 IN L.A.R.NO.58/2002 OF THE COURT OF THE SUBORDINATE JUDGE, CHERTHALA. .................... APPELLANT: 2ND RESPONDENT:- --------------------------------------- THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, K.S.I.D.C., TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH. RESPONDENTS: CLAIMANT & 1ST RESPONDENT:- --------------------------------------------------------- 1. C.R. GOPALAKRISHNA PANICKER, SANKARAMANGALATHU FROM THEKKECHAKKANATTU, PALLIPPURAM, CHERTHALA TALUK. 2. KERALA STATE, REP. BY THE SPL.TAHSILDAR (LA), INDUSTRIAL GROWTH CENTRE, CHERTHALA. R1 BY ADV. SRI.G.D.PANICKER SMT.JEENA JOSEPH R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.L.G.SURESH BABU. THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:- At the time of hearing the appeal, it was represented by the counsel appearing for the appellant that the connected appeal L.A.A. 688/2004 was already allowed by way of remand. Copy of the judment in the said L.A.A. was however not placed on record. However, based on the submission made, the judgment was dictated. But at the time of correcting the draft, the J.Ps in L.A.A. 688/2004 were called for and it was found that the said appeal is still pending and not yet disposed of. In such circumstances, the matter was posted for 'to be spoken to' along with L.A.A. 688/2004. 2. Heard. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that what was submitted earlier was a mistake. In view of the fact that L.A.A. 688/2004 is still pending, post this case along with L.A.A. 688/2004. P.R.R. (J) 9.2.2007.