Singla 3am?! IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Ci No. I g/QV‘OF 2009 PETITIONER Siyaram Kahar s/o Shri Kartik Ram Kahar, age'd‘ about 38 years, R/o village Bilaigarh, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Raipur (C.G.). VERSUS / RESPONDENTS :— 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through Chief Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Collector, District Raipur. Sub Divisional Officer, (Revenue), Bilaigarh, District Raipur (C.G.). K, , 4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Bilaigarh, District — Raipur (C;G.). / 5., Gram Panchayat — Bilaigarh, through ¥ it’s; Secretary, Gram Panchayat 1] WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226(29?‘0F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER:— As mentioned above in the cause title. , & M Wrcrihaxv‘s‘yi: / / / 6. Gore Lal Khunte s/o Kartik Ram oa?‘ Khunte, aged about 42 years, R/o $ ~ 69’ village Bilaigarh, District Raipur @w 9a? a (C.G.). HIGH COURT OF CHHA'I'I‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No. 1367 of 2009 PETITIONER : Siyaram Kahar. ‘ VERSUS RESPONDENTS : The State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri,‘ J. Present: Shri Poonam Patel, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No. l to 3. Shri Vineet K. Pandey, Advocate for the respondent No. 6 ORDER ORAL (Passed on 09 day of August, 2010) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that with the passage of time, this petition has become Muctuous. Learned counsel appearing for other side do not controvert the above submission. 3. In View of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become inhuctuous. /" : Sd/- i Satish K.Agnihotri Judge