The Hon’ble Sri Justice R.Subhash Reddy Writ Petition No.23789 of 2009 Order: In this Writ Petition, the petitioner seeks declaration, by way of Mandamus, that the action of the first respondent, in not taking action pursuant to his legal notice, dated 17-04-2009, and further representation dated 01-10- 2009, and not inspecting into the construction undertaken by the second respondent, as illegal and arbitrary. Petitioner claims to be the owner of a vacant site admeasuring Ac.0.26.21 cents equivalent to 1268.56 square yards in re-survey No.334/1B of Gunadala Village, Vijayawada Sub-Registry and Mandal, Krishna District. It is his grievance that towards the southern side of his site, the second respondent has undertaken construction of a multistoried building contrary to zoning regulations and that no action is being taken by the first respondent although he got issued legal notice through an Advocate on 17-04-2009 and filed representation on 01-10-2009. Perused the copies of legal notice, dated 17-04-2009, and representation, dated 01-10-2009, which are made available in the material papers filed along with the Writ Petition. From a perusal of the said legal notice, the petitioner’s grievance appears to be with regard to the encroachment by the second respondent into his site by raising structures therein. Even in representation, dated 01-10-2009, it has been stated that the second respondent has encroached into his site and opened windows into his site. Therefore, it is clear that there is a boundary dispute between the petitioner and the second respondent. In this case, it is to be seen that except stating that the construction undertaken by the second respondent is contrary to zonal regulations, no particulars as regards the alleged illegal construction have been furnished by the petitioner in this Writ Petition. Hence, no direction as sought for by him can be granted in this Writ Petition. However, it is open to the petitioner to pursue any other remedies available to him under law and seek adjudication of the said dispute. Subject to the above observation, the Writ Petition is dismissed at the stage of admission. No order as to costs. _________________ R.Subhash Reddy, J Dated 16th November, 2009 lur