HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISOARH. BILASPJJR W.P.fSlNo. 6221 of 2007 PETITIONBRS 1 Surcsh Kumar Kamioje, S/o Shri Shatruhaii Lal, Age about 36 years, Asst. Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Pipriya, BIock - Saja, Distt. - Dui^ 2 Akhil Kishore Lenjhare, S/o Shri Manbodh Lal Lenjhare, Age about 38 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Prmiaty School, Dhaarabhantha, Block Dongargarh, Distt. - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3 Purushottam Lal Motghare, S/o Motflal Motghare, Age about 41 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Prmiaiy School, Paadaripathara, Block - Chliuria, Distt. - Rajnaadgaon (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS 1 State Gtovt. ofChhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Education & Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Distt-Raipur (C.G.) 2 District Education Of&cer, Distt Durg/Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3 District Education Officer, Bemetara, Distt. Dui^ (C.G.) IWrit Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Coastitution oflndial Appearaace: Shri Somkaat Verma, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer, for the State on advaace copy. ORM, ORDER (1S.10.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard on adnussion. Learaed couasel for the petitioners subniits that the petitioners have passed B.T.I. examination on their owu expenses, fherefore, fhey are entitled to receive two advance iucreinents accordiag to circulars dated 24.12.1998 aad 01.03.1999. He also W.P.CSINo. 6221 of2007 (Z4y submits fhat ia niaay identical inatters, fhe petitions have been allowed ia terms of the order passed ia the case of Yetshwant JStinuir BhctrwOwai Vs. Municiptd CorfMratlon, Dury and cmother {2006 OS SSPJR-CG 96). He submits that the case ofthe petitioners is squarely covered by the said Judgiuent. This legal positiou is not disputed by fhe leamed counsel for the State. However, he subinits that fhe order niay be passed ia tenns of the said judgiuent, but it shatl be subjected to verification regarding petitioners' such qualification. Accordingly, this writ petition is aUowed ia terms of fhe order passed in case of Yashwant Kufnar Bharadwaj Vs. Munidpal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra) subject to verification of the facts as to whether fhe petitioners had acquired B.T.I. Examiaation Certificate on fheir own expenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 aad 01.03.1999 and further whether fhey have been paid two advance irtcreinents or not. The petition stands finaUy disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge vatti