IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 18TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 27TH KARTHIKA 1932 OP(C).No. 755 of 2010(O) ------------------------ OS.884/2009 of PRL.SUB COURT,THRISSUR .................... PETITIONER: ------------------------------- RAJAKUMARAN, S/O.AYYAZHIYIL KORU, THOZHUPPADAM DESOM, PAINKULAM VILLAGE, THALAPPILLY TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU, SENIOR ADVOCATE SMT.M.M.DEEPA RESPONDENT: --------------- PRAMOD, S/O.PANKAJAKSHY AMMA, CHENNATTU HOUSE, THOZHUPPADAM DESOM, PAINKULAM VILLAGE, THALAPPILLY TALUK. PIN-679531 THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOMAS P JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------- O.P(C).No.755 of 2010 --------------------------------------- Dated this 18th day of November, 2010 JUDGMENT Petitioner is the defendant in O.S.No.884 of 2009 of the court of learned Sub Judge, Thrissur. At a time when petitioner was engaged in the construction of a residential building in his property respondent filed a suit alleging that construction is in violation of relevant building rules and has obtained an order of injunction against such construction until disposal of the suit. Grievance of petitioner is that on account of the order he is not able to complete construction of the building. Ext.P3 is the photo of the building. Petitioner wants an early disposal of the suit, otherwise, he will be put to heavy loss and injury. 2. It is seen that from 2009 onwards there is an order of injunction restraining petitioner from further constructing the building. Necessarily, by the time the suit is disposed of there is possibility of escalation of price of materials and labour charges. Hence it is only just and proper that the suit is disposed of as early as possible. I therefore direct learned Sub Judge to dispose of the suit as early as possible giving it top priority. This petition is disposed of as above. (THOMAS P JOSEPH, JUDGE) Sbna/-