IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 3413 of 2010. Decided on: June 22, 2010. Kumari Viplov ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & ors. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Javed Khan, Advocate. For the Respondents : No. 1 & 2. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The Writ Petition is filed mainly with the following prayers:- “a) Writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ or order or direction quashing the verbal termination order dated 30-05-2008 with all consequential effects may be issued or passed. (b) Writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ or order directing respondent No. 1, 2 & 4 to allow the petitioner to perform his job as TGT (Science N.M) in Government Middle School, Lalag, District Mandi, H.P.” 2. Learned Senior Additional Advocate General submits that only a regular teacher has been appointed in the post occupied by the petitioner and by the very fact that the petitioner is a PTA teacher, the petitioner has to give room for a regular teacher since the PTA is only an adhoc arrangement made by the Parent Teacher Association. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that there are several vacancies available to accommodate the regular teacher and the fourth respondent need not be appointed in place of the petitioner and in case the fourth respondent is accommodated, the petitioner will have to go out and there is no other place where he can be accommodated since he is only PTA teacher. 2 4. It is certainly open to the petitioner to point out this aspect before the second respondent, in which case the second respondent will consider whether the fourth respondent can be accommodated at any other suitable place so that the petitioner can continue. Necessary orders in that regard shall be passed within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the representation alongwith a copy of this judgment. However, it is clarified that such continuance of the petitioner, if required and in the event of any vacancy available, shall be permitted only in case the petitioner fulfills the required qualification. 5. The Writ Petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice June 22, 2010. ( Justice Kuldip Singh ), (karan) Judge.