IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 9920 of 1999 Between: D.V.Subba Rao S/o D.Shankaran, Alind, Serilingampally, R/o H.NO.6-39,Prasanthinagar, Serilingampalli, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The General Manager(M & M), M/s The Aluminium Industries Ltd., Seri Lingampally Hyderabad-500 019. 2 The Executive Director M/s The Aluminium Industies Ltd., (Alind), Post. ALAPUZHH, Alleppy District, Kerala State. 3 The Labour Commissioner, A.P., Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ or order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus,directing the repondents 1 and 2 to take the petitioner immediately into service by posting in Alind Machinery Division, Serilingampally, Hyderabad by transfer w.e.f. 1-2- 99 as submitted in the supplication and supplicating Telegrams and representations and also pay all the wages/Bonus etc., due to petitioner ever since December, 1998 and also continue to pay till the date of retirement with all wages and allowances and Bonus enhanced from time in persuance of notice of Executive Director/2nd respondent dt:18-1-99 in Ref.SG:PO:ED:218 and subsequent circular of the 1st respondent in HY:GM:MH:99/2153 dt:27-1-99 as illegal and void abinitio and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstance of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.BUDHIRAJU VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.V.SRINIVAS The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is filed questioning the transfer of petitioner. No interim orders were passed while admitting the writ petition on 30.4.1999. Even otherwise, it is given to understand that the petitoner, on attaining the age of superannuation, retired from service. In view of the same, nothing survives in the writ petition for further adjudication, therefore, the same is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. ____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 13.3.2008 DA