IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 29TH MARCH 2011 / 8TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 9759 of 2011(T) ------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. SAHYA HARITHA SANGHAM,VISHNU VIHAR, VADUVATHU,MANACHAUD PO,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REP.BY ITS SECRETARY KRISHNAN 2. C.P.SASIDHARAN NAIR,CHERUPALLIYIL HOUSE, 50TH MILE, MANKULAM PO,IDUKKI. BY ADV. MR. D.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE TAHASILDAR,DEVIKULAM TALUK,IDUKKI 685 613. 2. THA TALUK SURVEYOR,DEVIKULAM TALUK, IDUKKI 685 613. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SURVEY & BOUNDARIES, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PAINAVU PO, IDUKKI 685 605. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. P. N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. W.P.(C) No. 9759 OF 2011 ......................................................................... Dated this the 29th March , 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioners have approached this Court with the following prayers: “i. to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction commanding the respondents to take appropriate action on Exhibit P3 application and Exhibit P4 representation without any further delay and at the earliest. ii. To declare that the petitioners are entitled to get the dispute redressed and re fixed their boundaries as provided under the Kerala Survey and Boundaries Act. III. to pass such other orders deem fit in the interest of justice, equity and good conscience. iv. to award costs of this proceedings from respondents to the petitioner. 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits with regard to the grievance projected in the writ petition that individual applications have been preferred before the concerned W.P.(C) No. 9759 OF 2011 2 authorities and that the petitioners have approached this Court seeking for appropriate reliefs as the applications preferred in this regard as borne by Exts.P3 and P4 are still to be acted upon. 3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 4. In the above circumstance, the second respondent is directed to consider Exts. P3 and P4 applications and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, with notice to all concerned, as expeditiously as possible at any rate within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk