HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR APPLICANTS ^N^l^ NON-APPLICANTS M.C.C. No. 244/2009 1. Shyainlal Kanwar (since deceased) fhrough legal representatives. (a) Kunwarmiati Kaawar, Wd/o Shyamlal kaiiwar, aged about 55 years, (b) Bajraag Siagh Kaawar, S/o Shyatnlal, aged about 30 years, (c) Subhautin Bai Kaawar, D/o Shyamlal, aged about 28 years. AU above cultivators aad resideut of vUlage Karda, m the Talisil-Baloda Bazar, Distt. Rapur(C.G.). VERSUS 1. (a) (b) (c) 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Narottain Kaawar, (snice deceased) fhrough legal representatives. Sukh Bai kanwar/ D/o Narottam, aged about 38 years. Victoriya D/o Narottain Kanwar, aged about 32 years. Bisrautiii Kaawar, D/o Narottam, aged about 45 years. Ramayaai Knwar S/o Narottam, aged about 40 years. Bisaafh. Kaawar S/o Nai'ottam, aged about 40 years. Ajmer Kaawar S/o NarottaBi, aged about 26 years., Ghaashyam Kanwar S/o Narottam, aged abozit 22 years. DUkuinar Kanwar S/o Ramiayan., aged about 19 years. Dilharaa Kaawr S/o Ramayan, aged about 23 years, Bharat Kaawar S/o Shyam. Sunder, aged about 30 years. Hira Bai Kanwar D/o Shyam Sunder, aged about 45 years. Radha Bai D/o Shyain Sunder Kaawar, aged about 31 years. AU cultivators aad resident of vUlage Karda ia ttie Tahsil Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipur(C.G.). The State of Chhattisgarh Through the CoUector Rapur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.). APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF S.A. 269/09. (SB :Hon>ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:- Mr. J.R. Verma, Advocate for the applicants. Shri Saryeev Kumar Agrawal, P,L. for the State/respondent N0. 11. ORAL- ORDER (Passed oa 16/7/2009) Heard on I.A. 1, application for condonation ofdelay iti fiUng fhe present petition, Present petition has been filed after 60 days of its Imiitation. Takiag iato consideration, fhe application (I.A. No. 1) is aUowed. Delay ta filing fhe present petition is hereby condoned, Also heard on petition for restoration of Second Appeal No. 269/09 dismissed vide oider dated 24/3/2009. Learaed counsel for the appUcaats frequentiy submits tliat due to mistake of counsel the default has not been made out good m compUaiice of the direction aad submits fhat present appllcants is haviag substantial question oflaw aad iDierits in fhe appeal. On diie consideration, tlie petition is aUowed aad second appeal No. 269/09 dismissed for non-compUao.ce ofthe order is set aside aad appeal is restored m its origmal number. No order as to costs, Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge ^