IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3268 of 2010 1. SURENDRA SINGH S/O SHRI JOMDHARI SINGH R/O VILL.- GRIDHAR BARAON, P.S.- NAWANAGAR, DISTT.- BUXAR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR ADULTS EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE BUXAR 5. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION SUPERINTENDENT BUXAR 6. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER NAWANAGAR, DISTT.- BUXAR 7. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT GIRIDHAR BAROON BLOCK- NAWANAGAR, DISTT.- BUXAR ----------- 2 5.8.2010 Petitioner was selected and appointed as Shiksha Mitra in the year 2005, which appointment was contractual and for a fixed period of eleven months. Before the same could be resumed, petitioner was stopped from working. Petitioner alleges that he made several protests to various authorities but nothing happened. His period of employment expired without renewal. Then came 2006 Rules, which, inter alia, provides that all Shiksha Mitras working were to be absorbed as Primary Panchayat Teacher. Petitioner was not absorbed as he was not working as Shiksha Mitra at that time. He again filed several protests to various authorities. Ultimately when the said rules were amended in 2008 and as per rule 18 thereof replacing the Block Development Officer, the tribunal was constituted to hear 2 the grievances of the Panchayat Teachers in regard to their recruitments and service conditions. Petitioner moved the tribunal and the tribunal, by the impugned order, has refrained from passing any order rightly, in my view, on the ground that the absorption of Shiksha Mitra as Panchayat Teacher ended in the year 2006 and the same cannot be adjudicated at this late stage. Having considered the matter, in my view, the impugned order does not require any interference. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. singh (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)