-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.494 OF 1996 WRIT PETITION NO.494 OF 1996 WRIT PETITION NO.494 OF 1996 1. Parekh Sales Corporation.. and anr, .. Petitioners. Vs 1. Life Insurance Corporation of India, ... & ors. Respondents Mr Phirdosh Pooniwalla i/b M/s Kanga & Co for the petitioners. Mr. S.M.Sakhardande with Mrs S.S.Wagh for respondent no.2. Mr V.Y.Sanglikar, for respondent-LIC. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. DATE : APRIL 05, 2006. DATE : APRIL 05, 2006. DATE : APRIL 05, 2006. PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. We have disposed of Writ Petition No.6268 of 1995 today by recording the detailed reasons after considering the submissions advanced by the parties and respondent no.2, who is the petitioner in this petition. For the self-same reasons, this petition is also dismissed. Rule discharged. No costs. 3. At this stage, the learned counsel for the -2- petitioners, submits that the petitioners and respondent no.2 may be permitted to make a representation to respondent no.1-corporation for regularisation on par with some other occupants/tenants in the same building owned by the corporation. We are granting such liberty to the petitioners and respondent no.2 to make a joint application to the respondent-corporation and if such application is made within four weeks from today, same may be considered on merits in accordance with law within two months therefrom. Possession of the petitioners and respondent no.2 is protected till the disposal of the representation made by them as aforestated. (D (D (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) B.BHOSALE, J.) B.BHOSALE, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)