IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 9767 of 2008. Decided on 31st December, 2010. _____________________________________________________ Vikramjeet and another. …Petitioners. -Versus- H.P. State Electricity Board and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioners. : Mr. V.D. Khidta, Advocate. For the respondents. : Ms. Anjula Khajuria, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Case of the petitioners, in a nut-shell, is that though they have been working for the last more than 15 years, however, their cases have not been considered for promotion to the post of Helper. 2. Case of the respondent-Board, precisely is that the post of Helper is not available in Rohru Circle. However, fact of the matter is that the cases of the petitioners are required to be looked into as per the instructions issued on 24th November, 2004 (Annexure A-14). 3. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent-Board to consider the case of the petitioners for promotion to the post of Helper from the feeder category of T. Mate as per instructions dated 24.11.2004 (Annexure A-14), within a period of two months from the date of 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 - production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioners. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 31, 2010. (bhupender) - 3 - `