KiGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition {Art.2275 {PR) No.5355.of201l d>p^ ^^3/ii Petitioner (Decree Holder) Raju l-ai Soni aged about 65 years, S/o Late Shri Chanduiai Soni, R/o Motipara, tn front of Lukhi Talab, Tah. & Distt.Durg (C.G.) Versus Respondenfs 1. Krishna Kumar Spni aged about 45 (Judgment debtors 1 to years, 2. Piiiu Lal Soni aged about 37 years, , 3. Narsndra Kumar aged a&out 35 yeare, tf) 4. Ashok Kumar Soni years, aged about Rsspondent No.1 to 4 Sons of Late Shri Makhanlal Soni, Resident of- Motipara, In frQ.nt'of Lukhi Taiab, Durg Tah. and District Durg (C.G.) Dhannuial Soni aged about 40 ysars, 6. Suresh Kumar Soni agad about 33 years, Both Rsspondents 5 and 6 sons of tate Shri Makhan La! Soni, Resident of Jimmi interprises, Right Choica Banjari Chowk, Nayapara Road, Raipur, Tah. and District Raipur (C-G.) 7. Smt.Meena Soni aged about 40 years, W/o Shri Radhe La! Soni, R/'o Saras Bihar Colony, House No.82, Near F.C.i. Raipura, T^h. and Ditrict Raipur (C.G.) 8. Smt.Dhana Bai aged about 60 yeare, W./o iate Shri Makhan Lai Soni, R/'o -» Motipara, infront of Lukhi-Taiab, Durg, Tah. and District Durg (C.G.) 9. Kamta Prssad Soni (Deceased) S/o Late S'MChandulai Soni, 9(1) Smt.Shashi Soni aged sbout 45 yaars, W/o Shri Baidau Soni, R/o Ward No.12, Thankhamhariya, Tahsil Saja, District Durg (C.G.) ?(2) ' Smt.Sandhya Soni aged about 39 years, W/o Shri Vima! Soni, Near Committee Hal!, (Oid) Purana Bus Stand, Mungeii, Distt.Bifasur (C.G.) 1» II 11'1 : II l:i li (al !i< B8N ^a.u. ifSSi. y1 ,;.»>• ^ 9(3) SyshH Kumar Soni agad about 44 years 9(4) ShaHdsnra Kumar Soni aged about 41 years 9(5) Devendra Kumar Soni aged about 37 years; 9(6) Yuvraj Soni aged about 54 years, Respondent No.9(3) to 9(S) sons of Late Shri Kamta Prasad Soni and Resident of Shri- Furniture N4art, Lukhi- Taiab, Besids Hanuman Mandir, Motipara.Durg, Tahsil and DisSrict Durg 10. Babooia! Soni aged about 56 years; S/o Late Shri Chandula! Soni, R/o Motipara, infront of Lukhi Taiab, Durg, Tah. and District Durg (C.G.) 11. Hon'bSe Distrtet Judge, Durg Tah. and Disirict Durg (C.G.) 12. Hon'bte Ssventh Addifionai Dtetrict Judge.-.Durg Tah and Distriet Durg Qft/rit Petition underArticfe 227 ofthe Constitution of india) Mr.V.T.Tamaskar, counsel for the pstitioner. Execuu'ng Court (SB: Hon'bis Mr. T.P. Sharma, J.) QRDER (12-9-2011) 1. Registry hss pointed out the deiault. 2. At the outset, iearned counsei for ihe petitioner submiis thaf the pstitioner has not praysd quashment of any- order but has praysd for expadffious dispe^ai of ths executing procseding, therefore, by giving direction this v/rit petition may be dispo^ed of. / 3. Considering We submission of iearned- counss! for the petiiioner and ' penciency of the execution procs^ting for long time before fte Court beiow, the'writ petition is disposed 'of with the direction that Seventh Additions! Dsstrict Judge, Durg shall dispose of the executing proceeding pending bsfore it in Ciyii Suit No,11-A/2000 as sariy as possible preferably within a -.period of six monttis froni the date of fiiing a copy of this order on behaif of ^the.petitioneK No prderas to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge t.-.iK' iy