1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application (APPA) No. 212/2010 The State of Mah. through The Central Bureau of Investigation, Nagpur Vs. Shriram Shitalprasad Kashyap and another. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Shri V.A. Thakre, APP for the applicant. CORAM: A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 19th JULY, 2010. 1. Heard. 2. Perused the judgment impugned. 3. Order of acquittal is based on reasons incorporated in paragraph 50. 4. The finding is that the source of liquidity reckoned and listed in para 50 is not taken into account, as a disclosed source of liquidity. 5. Thus the charge was totally based on unsound footing. 6. The said finding contained in paragraph No.50 of judgment impugned is not shown or challenged on the ground of being erroneous. 7. Unless said finding is shown to be erroneous, the appeal is meritless on the very face. 8. Application for leave and appeal are rejected. JUDGE Ambulkar.