IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 14TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 32603 of 2008(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- THE MANAGER, NUSRATHU ISLAM VOCATIONAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, P.O. MARAMPALLY, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT 683 107. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA SRI.SIRAJ KAROLY RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -14. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCTION, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM -30. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. SMT. E.J. ENZA, HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (HINDI), NUSRATHUL ISLAM VOCATIONAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, P.O. MARAMPALLY, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT 683 107. SHRI.A.J.VARGHESE, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.32603 of 2008 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 5th day of November, 2008 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is Manager of an aided school. He is aggrieved by Ext.P4 order directing deployment of the 5th respondent, who is stated to have been already absorbed in the petitioner's school it being a newly upgraded school. Against Ext.P4, the petitioner has filed Ext.P5 appeal before the 2nd respondent, which is pending. It is stated in Ext.P5 appeal itself that he has also sought for an interlocutory order staying the implementation of Ext.P4 as well. In this writ petition, what is sought for is an expeditious disposal of the appeal. 2. Having regard to the fact that Ext.P5 appeal filed by the petitioner is pending consideration of the 2nd respondent, this writ petition is disposed of directing that the 2nd respondent shall take up, consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 appeal with notice to the parties. This shall be done WP(C) No.32603/2008 -2- as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the 2nd respondent for compliance. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that unless implementation of Ext.P4 is deferred, he will be compelled to implement the same. In view of this apprehension of the petitioner, I direct that it will be open to the petitioner to move the 2nd respondent for getting Ext.P4 order suspended pending disposal of Ext.P5 appeal. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg