-: 1 :- HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 957 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5740 OF 1996 Mathurabai B. Damri Since deceased through LRs. ..Applicants Versus Tukaram Yeshwant Damri since deceased through LRs. ..Respondents. Mr. P. L. Naik for the Applicants. Mr. S. M. Railkar for respondent no. 1. Coram : R. V. MORE, J. Date : April 16, 2010. P. C. : 1. This civil application is taken out by the petitioners for bringing the legal heirs of deceased petitioner no.2 on record. Petitioner no.2 died on 14th December 1997 and the present civil application is filed on 28th January 2010. The applicants have given reasons in paragraph no.2 of civil application explaining the delay occurred in preferring this civil application. It is averred that for the first time in the month of September 2009 they came to know upon query from their advocate that legal heirs of petitioner no.2 are required to be brought on record. I find that the explanation is satisfactory and therefore same deserves to be condoned. In the result, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c). (R.V. MORE, J.) -: 2 :- HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 958 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5740 OF 1996 Mathurabai B. Damri Since deceased through LRs. ..Applicants Versus Tukaram Yeshwant Damri since deceased through LRs. ..Respondents. Mr. P. L. Naik for the Applicants. Mr. S. M. Railkar for respondent no. 1. Coram : R. V. MORE, J. Date : April 16, 2010. P. C. : 1. This civil application is taken out by the petitioners for bringing the legal heirs of deceased petitioner no.3 on record. Petitioner no.3 died on 21st December 2000 and the present civil application is filed on 28th January 2010. The applicants have given reasons in paragraph no.2 of civil application explaining the delay occurred in preferring this civil application. It is averred that for the first time in the month of September 2009 they came to know upon query from their advocate that legal heirs of petitioner no.3 are required to be brought on record. I find that the explanation is satisfactory and therefore same deserves to be condoned. In the result, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c). (R.V. MORE, J.) -: 3 :- HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 959 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5740 OF 1996 Mathurabai B. Damri Since deceased through LRs. ..Applicants Versus Tukaram Yeshwant Damri since deceased through LRs. ..Respondents. Mr. P. L. Naik for the Applicants. Mr. S. M. Railkar for respondent no. 1. Coram : R. V. MORE, J. Date : April 16, 2010. P. C. : 1. This civil application is taken out by the petitioners for bringing the legal heirs of deceased petitioner no.4 on record. Petitioner no.4 died on 11th June 2004 and the present civil application is filed on 28th January 2010. The applicants have given reasons in paragraph no.2 of civil application explaining the delay occurred in preferring this civil application. It is averred that for the first time in the month of September 2009 they came to know upon query from their advocate that legal heirs of petitioner no.4 are required to be brought on record. I find that the explanation is satisfactory and therefore same deserves to be condoned. In the result, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c). (R.V. MORE, J.) -: 4 :- HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 960 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5740 OF 1996 Mathurabai B. Damri Since deceased through LRs. ..Applicants Versus Tukaram Yeshwant Damri since deceased through LRs. ..Respondents. Mr. P. L. Naik for the Applicants. Mr. S. M. Railkar for respondent no. 1. Coram : R. V. MORE, J. Date : April 16, 2010. P. C. : 1. This civil application is taken out by the petitioners for bringing the legal heirs of deceased petitioner no.6 on record. Petitioner no.6 died on 3rd March 1997 and the present civil application is filed on 28th January 2010. The applicants have given reasons in paragraph no.2 of civil application explaining the delay occurred in preferring this civil application. It is averred that for the first time in the month of September 2009 they came to know upon query from their advocate that legal heirs of petitioner no.6 are required to be brought on record. I find that the explanation is satisfactory and therefore same deserves to be condoned. In the result, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c). (R.V. MORE, J.)