CRLR No.146 of 2007 Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J. (Misc. Application No.1000 of 2009) (Misc. Application No.473 of 2007) (Urgency Application No.2962 of 2011) Sri Sudhir Kumar, Advocate present on behalf of revisionist. Sri Lalit Sharm, Advocate present on behalf of respondent No.1 Preetpal Singh (complainant). Both the parties have entered into compromise and same has been filed on the record. The parties have also moved an Urgency application No.2962 of 2011. This urgency application is disposed of and matter is taken up today itself. Compounding application No.1000/2009 filed by both the parties is accepted and matter is compounded as per the terms and condition mentioned in the application. In the above circumstances, another Misc. application No.473 of 2007 seeking the cancellation of bail of the revisionist now has become infructuous and rejected accordingly. Fine deposited by revisionist shall be refunded to him by the trial court. (Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.) JKJ 04.08.2011