1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.631 OF 2010 Nagraj K. Mehta Plaintiff versus S. Ananthraj Defendant Mr.Krunal Sampat i/by S.K.Jain and Associates for plaintiff. None for the defendant. CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 21st February 2011 PC : 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff. The suit is placed on board under the caption "for ex-parte decree". The defendant has not entered appearance in spite of service of writ of summons. The original documents are placed on record including the letter of confirmation. 2. In view of sub-rube (3) of rule 2 of Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, case is made out for passing the decree. However, further interest from the date of filing the suit until payment and/or realisation is fixed @ 18% p.a. (simple interest) 3. The suit is accordingly decreed in terms of prayer clause (a) with modification that further interest will be payable as stated in clause-2 above. The plaintiff shall be entitled to refund of court fees, if any, as per rules. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.)