IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14395 of 2010 1. Madhuri Kumari W/O Sri Anand Kumar (Asstt. Manager S.B.I.) R/O Flat No.102, Tara Apartment , Sheopuri, P.O.&P.S.Shastri Nagar, Distt-Patna Versus 1. The Central Board Of Secondary Education , Through The Chairman, Sri Veneet Joshi' Shiksha Kendra' 2, Community Centre, Preet Vihar, Delhi-110092 2. The D.A.V.Public School, B.S.E.B. Colony New Punaichak, Patna 3. Sri Ramanuj Prasad , The Principal D.A.V. Public School, Bseb Colony New Punaichak, Patna 4. Sri Mithilesh Kumar Singh , Vice Principal , D.A.V.Public School Bseb Colony, New Punaichak, P.S. Shastri Nagar, Patna 5. Sri Navin Kumar (Incharge) Secondary Level, D.A.V.Public School Bseb Colony, New Punaichak, P.S. Shastri Nagar, Patna 6. Sri S.K.Roy(Class Teacher Of Class Ix-D(H), D.A.V.Public School Bseb Colony, New Punaichak, P.S. Shastri Nagar, Patna 7. Sri Ashok Kumar (Mathematics Teacher), D.A.V.Public School Bseb Colony, New Punaichak, P.S. Shastri Nagar, Patna 8. Anubha Lal (Biology Teacher), D.A.V.Public School Bseb Colony, New Punaichak, P.S. Shastri Nagar, Patna 9. Sri R.K. Chauhan, Regional Director, Sector-Ii, D.A.V.Public School Bseb Colony, New Punaichak, P.S. Shastri Nagar, Patna 10. The District Magistrate Patna 11. The State Of Bihar 12. The Union Of India, Through The Secretary, Department Of Human Resources Development New Delhi ---------------------------------- 7. 19.09.2011 None for the petitioner. Counsel for the CBSE and the School are present. Learned Senior Counsel Shri Chitranjan Sinha appearing for the School in question submits that he has instructions to state that the ward of the petitioner has remained errant in his behaviour. The Court upon consideration of the claims as made out in the pleadings of the writ application and the interim order of the Court dated 16.11.2010 made in the fond hope of possible check of alleged deviancy, orders the writ application to be dismissed on merits. If the petitioner has chosen not to be represented despite an interim order in her favour and the matter being on the cause list the Court is satisfied that she has had reasonable opportunity to defend the case but has voluntarily chosen not to do so. The interim order dated 16.11.2010 stands vacated. The writ application is dismissed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)