IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH JULY 2009 / 17TH ASHADHA 1931 RP.No. 435 of 2009 -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.2355/2009 Dated 13/03/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER / PETITIONER: ---------------------------------------------------- SAYID MOHAMMED, MUNDACKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, NADACKAL P.O., ERATTUPETTA. BY ADV. SRI.V.K.MOHAMMED YOUSUF RESPONDENTS / RESPONDENTS: ---------------------------------------------- 1. DEPUTY TAHASILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY OFFICE, PALAI. 2. VILLAGE OFFICER, ERATTUPETTA. 3. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, PALAI. BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. RAMANAND. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: app/- K.M.JOSEPH, J ============ R.P. No.435/2009 IN W.P.(C) No.2355/2009 ================ Dated this the 8th day of July 2009. O R D E R ======= This is a review petition filed against the interim order in W.P.(C) No.2355/2009. Aggrieved by the interim order, by which this court directed the petitioner to remit Rs.5,000/-, this review Petition is filed. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the liability of the petitioner is limited to the terms of the bond executed before the sales tax authorities. The assessee died in the year 2003 and going by the terms of the bond, the liability will cease upon the expiry of one year from the date of the death, he points out. 3. I would think that in the light of the terms of the bond, the order is to be reviewed. Accordingly I allow the review petition and remove the condition regarding the deposit of Rs.5,000/- K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE app/-