Crl.M.No.M-29180 of 2009 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-29180 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 6, 2010 Boota Singh .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Vikram K.Chaudhri, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Rajinder Singh Arya, DAG, Haryana. Mr.Sudhir Sharma, Advocate for the complainant. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner requests to place on record certified copies of statements of PWs4 and 5, Dr.Neeraj Kumar Galhotra and Satbir Singh with affidavits, copies of orders dated 22.3.2010, 17.3.2010, 20.4.2010, 27.4.2010 and 28.4.2010, and copy of statement of Dr.Gaggandeep Singh. The same are taken on record. The present petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.130, dated 12.7.2009, under Sections 323, 324, 326, 307, 34 IPC, registered at Police Station Rania, District Sirsa. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that injury attributed to the present petitioner is to complainant-injured, namely, Sukhdev Singh on leg, which is non-vital part. It is further contended that as per allegations, the same injury was also caused to Sukhdev Singh by co- accused Saraj Singh and, however, as per medico legal examination of Crl.M.No.M-29180 of 2009 (O&M) -2- Sukhdev Singh, he has suffered only one injury on the left leg. It is further contended that petitioner has been continuing in custody since 7.8.2009 and that trial is not likely to be concluded in near future, as only three medical witnesses have been examined so far. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. However, bail application has been opposed by learned State counsel merely on the ground that the main witnesses are yet to be examined. Hence, in view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner- Boota Singh, for grant of regular bail is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Sirsa. 6.5.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge