IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25679 of 2010 1. SUDAMA RAI 2. Pramila Devi Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 18.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Abhey Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the complainant. The allegation for the offence under Section 379 of the I.P.C. is doubted as its being super addition otherwise grievances of the parties is earlier at time while they were related as landlord and tenant. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 1387 of 2009 above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Rohtas at Sasaram subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)