1 Criminal Writ Petition No.359/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.359 OF 2010 Sow. Surekha w/o Subhash Kadam ... PETITIONER VERSUS Mrs. Nirmala w/o Wamanrao Patil & anr. ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri P.R. Patil, Advocate holding for Shri V.S. Panpatte, Advocate for petitioner Shri G.G. Suryawanshi, Advocate for respondent No.1. Shri V.D. Rakh, A.P.P. for respondent No.2. ..... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 22nd June, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard Shri P.R. Patil, learned counsel holding for Shri V.S. Panpatte, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri G.G. Suryawanshi, learned counsel for respondent No.1 (original complainant). Parties are present, identified by respective counsel. On verification, Smt. Surekha w/o Subhash Kadam and Smt. Nirmala w/o Wamanrao Patil have informed that they have discussed the issue involved in the litigation. The original complainant is satisfied that there was no intention on the part 2 Criminal Writ Petition No.359/2010 of accused to defame or to commit any offence under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The relations between the accused and complainant are cordial. In view of this, they have urged to quash Regular Criminal Case No.505/2009, pending before learned Chief Judicial Magistrate at Nanded. 2. Considering above features of the matter, and on a trivial issue the parties turned to be at logger head, consequently Regular Criminal Case No.505/2009, pending before learned Chief Judicial Magistrate at Nanded, arising out of private complaint is quashed and set aside. (K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. ) fmp/cwp359.10