IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID FRIDAY, THE 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 8TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 26076 of 2011(H) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- M/S.DEEPA RESTAURANT, CHANKARAMKULAM, PONNANI, MALAPPURAM, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, M.RAMACHANDRAN, AGED 64 YEARS, S/O.GOVINDAN NAIR. BY ADVS. SRI.M.G.KARTHIKEYAN SRI.NIREESH MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY, TAXES (A) DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONERATE OF EXCISE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, MALAPPURAM-676505. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE, PONNANI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679577. R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.MUHAMMED SHAFI.M THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: STU WP(C).No. 26076 of 2011(H) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 : PHOTOCOPY OF THE PARTNERSHIP DEED DTD 10/04/2003 EXECUTED BETWEEN THE PARTNERS OF THE PETITIONER FIRM. P2 : PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD 29/09/2010 IN WP(C) NO.13258/2010 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT. P3 : PHOTOCOPY OF THE RESOLUTION DTD 25/09/2010 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER. P4 : PHOTOCOPY OF THE DEMAND DRAFTS DTD 23/09/2010 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. P5 : PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER DTD 01/10/2010 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P6 : PHOTOCOPY OF THE FL-3 LICENSE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER FIRM DTD 24/04/1991. P7 : PHOTOCOPY OF THE REVISION PETITION DTD 20/10/2010 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. P8 : PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER NO.XCI-159/10 DTD 28/10/2010 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P9 : PHOTOCOPY OF THE REVISION PETITION DTD 09/11/2010 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY/ P. A TO JUDGE STU HARUN-UL-RASHID,J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO.26076 OF 2011 ------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2011 JUDGMENT Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the Government Pleader. 2. This writ petition is filed for a direction commanding the lst respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P7 and P9 revision petitions filed against Exts.P5 and P8 orders respectively. 3. When the matter was taken up for admission today, the learned Senior Counsel submits that Exts.P7 and P9 revision petitions are pending consideration before the lst respondent and requests this Court to issue a direction to the lst respondent to consider and dispose of Exts.P7 and P8 revision petitions within a time frame. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the lst respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Exts.P7 and P9 revision -2- W.P.(C).No.26076/2011 petitions, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge. kcv.