COCP No.305 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. COCP No.305 of 2011 Date of Decision: 10.2.2011 Sheetal Vij .....Petitioner Vs. Sudesh Puri and others ....Respondents .... CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA **** Present : Mr. R.S. Bains, Advocate for the petitioner. .... RAJIVE BHALLA, J (Oral) An injunction order was passed restraining respondent no.1 from raising any further construction. The petitioner alleges that despite this injunction, respondent no.1 has continued to carry out construction. It is also alleged that despite filing applications before respondents no.3 to 7, construction has been carried out in gross and blatant violation of the orders of interim injunction. It is also submitted that the petitioner has filed an application under Order 39 Rule 2-A of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short `the CPC'), in which notice has been issued to respondent no.1 for 22.4.2011. Heard. The petitioner has already filed an application under Order 39 Rule 2-A of the CPC which enables a civil court to not only punish for COCP No.305 of 2011 2 violation of its order, but also to ensure that its order is enforced. The petition is, therefore, disposed of with liberty to the petitioner, to file a fresh application in the already pending petition filed under Order 39 Rule 2-A of the CPC, calling upon the trial court to ensure that its order dated 25.11.2010 is complied with in letter and in spirit by all authorities concerned including the defendants in the suit. 10.2.2011 (RAJIVE BHALLA) GS JUDGE