1808ba419.11.odt 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO. 419 OF 2011 (Sudhir Ramdas Anchilwar Vs. State of Maharashtra) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders Shri A. Y. Kapgate, Advocate for applicant. Shri C. N. Adgokar, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : U. V. BAKRE, J. DATED : 18TH AUGUST, 2011 1. Heard Shri Kapgate, learned Advocate for the applicant and Shri Adgokar, learned A.P.P. for the respondent- State. 2. It is seen that initially on 11/12/2010, the father of the deceased has filed oral report only against three persons namely the present applicant, his father and his mother. Subsequently on 13/12/2010, the father of the deceased has filed another report and in this report he has implicated the sister of the applicant by name Chandrakala stating that she is mainly responsible for the death of his daughter and that she used to harass his daughter physically as well as mentally. 3. It is seen that charge-sheet has already been filed in the present case which means that investigation is completed. The main accused Chandrakala has been granted anticipatory bail by the trial Judge. The other accused persons 1808ba419.11.odt 2/2 namely Ramdas and Gangubai Anchilwar have also been released on bail by the trial Judge. 4. All the accused persons have been charged for offence under Sections 498-A, 304-B and 306 with the aid of Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant was arrested on 12/12/2010. 5. In the reply there is nothing to show that the applicant has any criminal background. There is also no averment in the reply that the applicant would tamper with the evidence. Since all other co-accused are on bail, in my view, the present applicant should also be granted bail, now. 6. In the result, the applicant shall be released on bail in Sindewahi police station Crime No. 57/2010 registered for offence punishable under Sections 498-A, 304-B, 306 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act upon execution of personal recognition bond in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- (rupees fifteen thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount under the conditions that the applicant shall not tamper with the evidence and shall not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court. 7. Bail bond shall be executed before the trial Court. 8. The application stands disposed of accordingly. Hamdast granted. JUDGE wwl