IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 12708 of 2005 Between: 1 Rajana Satyanarayana, S/o. Late Satyam, R/o. Uddapalem Village, Atchuthapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 2 Rajana Appanna, Alias Chinnadu, S/o. Late Satyam, R/o. Uddapalem Village, Atchuthapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 3 Rajana Tatalu, S/o. Late Satyam, R/o. Uddapalem Village, Atchuthapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 4 Rajana Demudu, S/o. Late Satyam, R/o. Uddapalem Village, Atchuthapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 5 Rajana Dalayya, S/o. Late Satyam, R/o. Uddapalem Village, Atchuthapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Collector, Visakahaptnam, Visakahaptnam District. 2 The Special Deputy Collector (L.A.,), A.P.I.I.C., S.E.Z. UNIT-I, Near S.B.I. Collectors Office, Visakahaptnam. 3 Rajanna Satyam, S/o. Late Simhachalam, R/o. Uddapalem, Atchutapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 4 Rajana Demudu, S/o. Late Atchanna, R/o. Uddapalem, Atchutapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 5 Rajana Venkanna, S/o. Late Atchanna, R/o. Uddapalem, Atchutapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 6 Rajana Nagaraju, S/o. Late Atchanna, R/o. Uddapalem, Atchutapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Orderor Direction, particularly a Writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the actionof the respondents 1 and 2 in violating the procedure under Land Acquisition Act, and attempting to pay compensation amount to respondents 3 to 6, without referrring the same to civil court under Sectioon 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and further direct the respondents 1 and 2 to refere the dispute to competent civil court under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act and pass such other order or orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.V.SUBRAHMANYA NARUSU Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.A.NARASIMHA MURTHY The Court made the following : ORDER: Sri.K.V.SurahmanyaNarusu, the learned Counsel for the petitioner filed a letter dt. 23.4.2009 stating that the petitioner does not wish to pursue the writ petition. In view of the letter, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Dt. 24.4.2009. _______________ Goda Raghuram,J Krb. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION No. 12708 of 2005 Dated: 24.4.2009.