CLR No.38 of 2007 H on ’ble Ta r u n Aga r wa la , J . Sri Vikas Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Sri V. B. S. Negi, Advocate for the revisionist. Sri Subhash Upadhyaya, Brief Holder for the State. Steps to serve respondent no.3 has not been taken inspite of repeated time being granted. Consequently, the civil revision is dismissed against the respondent no.3. The learned counsel for the revisionist has made a request for adjournment. The Court finds that repeated adjournments have been made at the request of the learned counsel for the revisionist. The request for further adjournment is declined. Sri Vikash Pandey, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that he is not in a position to argue the matter. The civil revision is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order stands vacated. The Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the court below for information and necessary action within a week from today. Dated 23.04.2010 LSR (Ta r u n Aga r wa la , J .)