Civil Revision No. 3207 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3207 of 2011 Date of Decision: 13.5.2011 *** Paro @ Piar Kaur & Ors. .. Petitioners Vs. Krishana Wanti .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present:- Mr. N.S. Dandiwal, Advocate for the petitioners. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. Civil suit for specific performance was decreed way back in the year 1984. The decree holds good even up to the highest Court. In execution of the aforesaid decree, the sale-deed was executed in favour of DH and it is not in dispute that symbolic possession thereof was also given to the DH. However, at the time of filing of an application for delivery of actual and physical possession, the applicants-JD took the objection that the property, which is the subject matter of the aforesaid decree, is not partitioned one and hence its actual and physical possession cannot be delivered. The Court below dismissed their said objections by dint of order dated 19.4.2011, leading to the filing of the present revision petition. Heard. The factual aspect of the matter is not in dispute. It is evident from the records that revenue record was produced by the decree holder to show that the joint property was partitioned amongst the co-sharers and it was duly acted upon. In this view of the matter, the Executing Court below rightly observed that the share which has to be given to the decree holder is identifiable and rightly dismissed the objections. There is no merit in the instant petition, which is accordingly dismissed. (ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE May 13, 2011 Jiten