IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41834 of 2009 SANJAY KUMAR RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 9 15.3.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The offences are alleged under sections 342,323,498A and 406/34 of I.P.C. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in the Complaint Case No.2728/08 filed by the O.P.No.2 alleging allegations of demand of dowry. Learned counsel appearing for the O.Ps submits that the allegations have been made specifically against this petitioner also with regard to the demand of dowry and torture in several paragraphs of the complaint. Considering the submissions of the parties and the nature of the offences, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner stands rejected. It is made clear that if petitioner surrenders before the court below and pray for regular bail the same shall be 2 considered same day on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order. Anilkr.sinha (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)