1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRI. WRIT PETN. NO.: 518 OF 1995 Latabai W/o Bhimrao Thakare and others. Versus The State of Maharashtra and another. 1. Counsel for the respective parties absent. 2. The matter arise out of prosecution for an offence under section 498-A, 323, 504 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code. In one of the application, being Criminal Application No.3201 of 2005 a statement was made that the wife and husband have settled the controversies. 3. An application was moved before the learned Judge dated 24th June, 1994, however, the learned Judge, by order dated 13th June, 1995, refused to entertain the same as the offence is not compoundable and no ground for granting permission were disclosed. 4. On going through the recitals of the report, it is apparent the grounds are lacking to attract ingredients of section 498-A or Indian Penal Code. In the situation, apart from there being inter-se settlement between the parties, no case for issuance of process for an offence under section 498-A, 323, 504 IPC is established. 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. Consequently, the issuance of process in R.C.C. No.44 of 1993 is set aside. 5. Criminal Writ Petition allowed to the extent. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:28/07/2009. ans/518