THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.10096 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioners complain that the second respondent is making construction over a site without any valid permission and though the same was brought to the notice of the first respondent, no action has been taken thereon. They seek appropriate directions in this regard. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents. There is a civil dispute between the petitioners on the one hand and the second respondent on the other, over a site of 280 square yards carved out of Survey No.1317/A of Karimnagar Revenue Village. Initially, the first respondent accorded permission to the second respondent to make construction. However, it was cancelled at the instance of the petitioners and the same gave rise to the filing of W.P.No.23911 of 2007. Ultimately, the order of cancellation is said to have been upheld. Had the matters rested at that, there would have some possibility for acceding to the request of the petitioners to direct the first respondent to remove the unauthorised structure. It is a matter of record that the petitioners filed O.S.No.183 of 2007 in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Karimnagar in respect of that very property against the second respondent. Interlocutory orders passed therein gave rise to the filing of C.R.P.No.3627 of 2009 before this Court. It was disposed of with a direction that the second respondent shall not make any construction. Any direction to the first respondent to proceed against the construction would amount to reviewing the order in the C.R.P. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioners and the second respondent to work out their remedies in the pending suit. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Dated:18.11.2009 kdl