IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.W.P. No. 395 of 2010 Decided on 15.3.2010 Joginder Singh ….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and another. …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge. For the Petitioner: Mr. L. Pal, Advocate, For Respondents Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Addl. A.G., with Mr. J.K Verma, Deputy Advocate General Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved since he is not given a posting at the place of his wife, by the respondent. Learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the wife can be posted at the transferred place of the petitioner, in case the petitioner so desires so. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that in case a vacancy arises in the meanwhile, petitioner can be accommodated in case there are no better claimants than the petitioner. This the petitioner may point out before the first respondent in which case the first respondent will consider the request of the petitioner. The needful shall be done by the first respondent within a period of two weeks from the date of production of the copy of the judgment alongwith the copy of the writ petition. Petition stands disposed of. ( Justice Kurian Joseph ), Chief Justice March 15, 2010(sl/p) ( Justice R.B. Misra ), Judge