WP(C) 6456/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B. K. SHARMA Heard Mr. D. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. D ebojit Saikia, learned Addl. Advocate General, Assam. I have also heard Mr. B. C houdhury, learned Standing Counsel, Education. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 12.10.2011 (Annexure-B), by which pursuant to the rationalization of posts of Lower Primary and Upper Pr imary School teachers under Jorhat District, he has been transferred along with the post from Moqtab Adarsha L.P. School to 357 No. Khongia Balika L.P. School. Although the petitioner has raised the question of bringing the impugned transf er order within the purview of the rationalization of post, Mr. D. Saikia, learn ed AAG, Assam submits that the authority having passed the order taking note of all the tending facts and circumstances, there is nothing wrong in transferring the petitioner. Having regard to the limited scope of interference in such matters and a lso having regard to the disputed question of facts involved, this writ petition stands disposed of providing that the petitioner may approach the Deputy Commis sioner, Jorhat, Chairman District Level Committee by submitting appropriate repr esentation agitating his grievance within 7(seven) days from today. In the event of making such representation, the said authority shall dispose of the same by a speaking order, as expeditiously as possible, in terms of the OM dated 25.8.20 11 (Annexure-A). With the above observation, the writ petition stands disposed of, withou t however, any order as to costs.