MGN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.7660 of 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.7660 of 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.7660 of 2005 Shri Bahusaheb Shivshankar Dhavan..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.....Respondents Nr.S.A. Kumbhakoni, for the Petitioners. Mrs. S.S.Bhende, AGP for Respondent 1 and 2. CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO & REBELLO & REBELLO & R.M.SAVANT, JJ. R.M.SAVANT, JJ. R.M.SAVANT, JJ. DATED : 13TH MARCH, 2007 DATED : 13TH MARCH, 2007 DATED : 13TH MARCH, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. . The petitioner resigned from service. Once he has so resigned the entire service is forfeited in terms of M.C.S. Rules and the petitioner is not entitled to any pension. The learned Counsel seeks to rely on the judgment in M/s.J.K. Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Company Ltd., Vs.State of Up.P. & Ors.. AIR 1990 SC 1808. The expressions "retrenchment" and "Termination" have been considered in the context of Industrial Law and not in the context of M.C.S. Rules. That judgment would be of no assistance considering the Rule being provided for forfeiture of service. Considering the above, no interference called for. Petition rejected. (F.I.REBELLO F.I.REBELLO F.I.REBELLO, J) (R.M.SAVANT,J R.M.SAVANT,J R.M.SAVANT,J.)