1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION LOD.NO.1698 OF 2008 M/s.Hotel Panchamruth .. Petitioner Versus Municipal Corporation of Gr.Mumbai & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.S.G.Bhandary i/b. M/s.Bhandary & Bhandary for petitioner Ms.Archana Joshi for respondents CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 14th July 2008 P.C. . Mr.Bhandary after taking instructions makes a statement that the petitioner establishment hereafter will not serve food items and Eatables in the compound of the Building. 2. The Corporation has given permission to construct a compound wall which compound wall, 2 prima facie, is existing at site. However, when the petitioner enclosed it and has placed tables and chairs and started serving food and other eatables that the Corporation has stepped in and cancelled the permission. Now, petitioner undertakes to this Court that it will not serve any food and eatables in the compound of the building and will not put up any shed or temporary construction enclosing compound wall so as to enable it to use it as extension of the Restaurant. Further, the portion will be kept open to sky. 3. On that condition, the existing compound wall is permitted and should not be removed by the Corporation in pursuance of the impugned notice. 4. In the light of the undertaking, no further and other reliefs need be granted. Petition is disposed of. Any violation of the 3 undertaking given to this Court may entail in petitioner being proceeded against under Contempt of Courts Act and in addition, the Corporation would be at liberty to demolish any construction, temporary or permanent without notice or intimation to the petitioner. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)