IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 708 (SB) OF 2002 Nirpendra Pratap Batshal, S/o Sri Ramesh Kunwar, R/o Mahubadabra, Teshil Kashipur, District- Udham Singh Nagar. ……Petitioner. Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Secretary Education, Dehradun. 2. Assistant Director Education Nainital. 3. Zila Basic Shiksha Adhikari District Udham Singh Nagar. 4. Principal Zial Shiksha and Parshikshar Sansthan, Nainital. ………Respondents. Mr.Khalil Ahmad, Advocate for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel for he respondents. Dated : 05.05.2006 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. By the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to appoint the petitioner as Assistant Teacher in Prathmik Vidhyalaya. Briefly stated, petitioner has applied for the post of Assistant Teacher in Prathimik Vidhyalaya before the respondent no. 3 Zila Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Udham Singh Nagar. The grievance of the petitioner is that he is not being considered for the post of Assistant Teacher in Prathmik Vidhyalaya as he has passed B.A. from outside U.P. The petitioner has referred the advertisement referred in respect of appointment as B.T.C. Teacher according to which he fulfills all the qualifications. At the time of filing of the application No. 113 of 2005 in the writ petition, following order was passed:- “Heard learned counsel for the parties. By order dated 29.6.2002, this court directed respondents to consider the candidate of petitioner for special BTC. In pursuance to that order petitioner was permitted to undergo the training and now, he has completed the training of Special BTC. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that result of the Special BTC Training Examination has been declared on 25.1.2005 but the result of the petitioner has not been declared. Since the petitioner has already completed the training respondents are directed to declare the result of the petitioner, provisionally, provided petitioner has completed his training successfully and if he is selected for appointment to the post of Assistant Teacher in Primary School shall be subject to the decision of the writ petition.” As will appear from the aforesaid interim order, that this Court has already directed that the result may be declared provided the petitioner has completed training successfully and he has been selected for post of Assistant Teacher in Primary School. Subject to the aforesaid directions given in the order dated 10.02.2005, writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) 05.05.2006 Rathour