IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 627 of 2010 Vijay Arora. … Petitioner. Versus Madan Lal Tandon and another. … Respondents. Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Date April 30, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. The only prayer made in this writ petition that a direction be given to Civil Judge (Senior Division) Roorkee (Haridwar) to dispose of S.C.C. case No. 1 of 2009, pending in that court. The petitioner instituted S.C.C. Suit No. 1 of 2009 against the respondents for decree of eviction and recovery of rent and damages in the court of Judge, S.C.C./Civil Judge (S.D.) Roorkee on 13-1-2009. The grievance of the petitioner is that the defendant- respondents are adopting dilatory tactics to prolong the litigation. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the Judge, S.C.C./Civil Judge (Senior Division) Roorkee is directed to decide the S.C.C. Case No. 1 of 2009, Vijay Arora Vs. Madan Lal Tandon and another, in accordance with law, expeditiously as far as possible. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. ( B.S.Verma, J.) RCP 2