IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.5137 of 2009 Pramod Yadav, son of Late Suresh Prasad Yadav, resident of village & P.O. Bhahrampur, P.S.Bihpur, District- Bhagalpur. . . . . . Petitioner. Versus 1. The Union Of India through office of the Sr. Intelligence officer Directorate of Revenue, Sub-Regional Unit, Muzaffarpur, 2. The State of Bihar. . . . . . Opposite Parties. ----------- 2/ 24.03.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case which has been registered for the offences under Sections 20 and 23 of the N.D.P.S. Act and has been apprehended with 60 Kg. of Ganja, which is of commercial quantity. Submission is that for the first time petitioner has been implicated in a case. The petitioner has not committed any offence and he has not the owner of the seized article. Recovery is commercial quantity of Ganja and according to Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act the accused is entitled to be released on bail only if the court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that he is not guilty of such offence and that he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail. There is nothing on record from which these inferences can be drawn. Considering the recovery of commercial quantity of Ganja, I am not inclined to grant bail to petitioner. Accordingly his prayer for bail is rejected. Uday/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)