IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.148 of 2008 Date of Decision:- 11.1.2008 Narinder Kumar ....Petitioner(s) through Mr.Deepak Gupta, Advocate vs. Ramji Dass and others ....Respondent(s) *** CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. *** 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? *** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 19.12.2007 whereby an application moved by the respondents to lead additional evidence comprising of death certificate of Nanak Chand Aggarwal, has been allowed. There is no denial to the fact that the death of Nanak Chand Aggarwal is a subsequent event having taken place on 3.3.2007. From the observations made by the learned Rent Controller, it is apparent that the fact of death of Nanak Chand Aggarwal has some bearing on the final outcome of the pending proceedings. In these circumstances, no jurisdictional error has been committed by the learned Rent Controller in directing the respondents to lead the aforementioned evidence. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, vehemently contends that the fact of death of Nanak Chand Aggarwal and/or his death C.R. No.148 of 2008 -2- certificate has absolutely no bearing on the merits of the case. Needless to say that the aforementioned contention would be available to the petitioner at the time of the final disposal of the case. With these observations, no interference in the impugned order is called for. Dismissed. January 11, 2008 ( SURYA KANT ) poonam JUDGE