IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 8TH AUGUST 2008 / 17TH SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 33002 of 2005(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ K.C.KURUVILA, S/O.CHACKO, KALAPPURAKKAL HOUSE, PADIYOTCHAL P.O. KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.B.SHAJIMON RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, THE KANNUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., KANNUR. 2. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, SALES OFFICER, THE KANNUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., KANNUR. ADV. SRI.P.NARAYANAN,SC,KANNUR DIST.CO.OP.BANK FOR R1 SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.ANU SIVARAMAN FOR R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) No.33002/2005 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- Ext.P1 PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE RATION CARD AND BANK PASS BOOK Ext.P2 PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE SALE NOTICE Ext.P3 PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION Ext.P4 PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE LETTER NO.C.E.P.238/2004 Ext.P5 PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 27-9-2005 Ext.P6 PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE LETTER NO.5887/2005/AEN/N.Z. Ext.P7 PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE GOVT. ORDER RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A. to Judge. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ---------------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.33002 OF 2005 (D) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of August, 2008 J U D G M E N T Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the first respondent, I find no jurisdictional error or legal infirmity in the impugned proceedings. The petitioner filed this writ petition in November 2005 seeking alternative relief to let him to pay off the outstandings in ten instalments. It is stated that he remitted Rs.40,000/- following the interim order dated 25-11-2005. Under such circumstances, the petitioner is given 45 days to pay off the entire remaining outstandings subject to any reduction in the total outstandings that the bank may extend, if the petitioner is entitled to any ameliorative benefits in terms of any circulars or other schemes which are acted upon by the first respondent. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE skr/11/8 // True copy // P.A. to Judge.