IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19098 of 2011 NARESH RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.6.2011 Heard Shri Jai Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Parmeshwar Mehta, learned A.P.P. for the State. As may appear from the F.I.R. as also from the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 cr. P.C., the victim was taken away forcibly in order to getting married to the daughter of Bino Rai and he was indeed married to the lady. The submission is that abduction of some one for the purposes of getting him married is not the defined offence. Regard being had to the submissions, let the petitioner, Naresh Rai be directed to be released, either in the event of his arrest by the police or surrender before the court below, on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in Begusarai Town P.S.Case No. 468 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) Cr. P..C. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)