IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2862 OF 2008. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders. orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.M.S.Mohite, i/b. Ms.Mona Malhotra, for the Applicant. Mr.R.S.Jaisinghani, a/w J. D’silva, for the Respondent No.2. Mr.Y.S.Shinde, APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. : A.S.OKA, J. : A.S.OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 11th September 2008. : 11th September 2008. : 11th September 2008. P.C.: 1. For the reasons separately recorded in the Judgment, following is the operative part of the order:- 2. Subject to what is observed above, the learned Sessions Judge was justified in not accepting the submissions made on behalf of the Applicant. Subject to what is observed above, no case is made out for interference. The Application is rejected. 3. At this stage, the learned Counsel for the : 2 : Applicant states that the hearing of the application for anticipatory bail may be stayed. It is not possible to accede to this request. The result of this order will be that the first informant will be heard before passing an order on the application for anticipatory bail and therefore, merits of the case of the Applicant in the application for anticipatory bail will not be affected. Hence, the said prayer is rejected. 4. As a copy of the Judgment may not ready immediately, the parties and the concerned Court to act upon an authenticated copy of operative part of the order. ( A.S.Oka, J.) A.S.Oka, J.) A.S.Oka, J.)