1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 295/2009 (Ratan Katiram Walde VERSUS Dr.Babasaheb Ambedkar Education Society & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri G.S. Shukla, counsel for the applicant. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : MARCH 17, 2009. It is not necessary to issue notice to the non-applicant on this civil application as no notice was issued in the Miscellaneous Civil Application No.183/2009 before it was dismissed for want of prosecution. I have heard the learned counsel for the applicant and perused the contents of the civil application. Since the client should not suffer for the mistake of the counsel, as it appears from paragraph 4 of the civil application that it was a mistake of the counsel in not noticing the miscellaneous civil application for restoration on 22.01.2009, it is necessary to restore the miscellaneous civil application. 2 Hence, the miscellaneous civil application No.183/2009 is restored to file subject to the payment of costs of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred only) in the High Court Legal Services Sub Committee, Nagpur within a period of one week from today. The miscellaneous civil application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and disposed of. JUDGE APTE