IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19084 of 2010 LAL BAHADUR SADA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 26.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail since 13.01.2010 in a case registered under Section 392 I.P.C. It is alleged in the F.I.R. that three persons snatched the motorcycle and the cash from the informant. Petitioner’s name subsequently sprang up on the confessional statement of three witnesses. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that if these witnesses would have seen the petitioner at the place of occurrence then the petitioner’s name would have been mentioned in the F.I.R. itself. Hence their statement before the police is subsequent development. Moreover it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is involved in only one case apart from the present one in which he is on bail and the charge sheet has already been submitted. Considering the submissions and the period of custody, let the petitioner namely Lal Bahadur Sada be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each 2 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Basnahi P.S. Case No. 51 of 2004. The Trial Court will be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner if the petitioner fails to appear during trial on three consecutive dates. Shageer (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)