1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.2717/2002. : : Subhash Chand Yadav Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : : Date of Order 21.11.2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ None present for the petitioner. Mr.Hemant Gupta, Addl.Govt.Counsel for the State. This writ petition has been filed with the prayer that the respondents be directed to give appointment to the petitioner because the candidates who had on lessor merit, were given appointment. Another argument is that the petitioner should have been considered in the category of handicapped candidates for appointment. The respondents in reply to the writ petition have clarified that the petitioner who is in OBC category, has merit of 56.07% whereas the last candidate in that category secured 59.57% marks. The other argument of the petitioner is rebutted by the respondents by submitting that neither did the petitioner mention in his application form that he was claiming appointment against the handicapped quota nor did he enclose any certificate of competent authority showing 2 that he was the handicapped person. The selections were finalized way back in the year 2002. Since the petitioner has not able to substantiate any of the arguments, therefore, I do not find any merit in this writ petition. In the result, this writ petition is dismissed. A copy of this judgment be endorsed to the petitioner for information. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ)J. A.Arora/- Item No.28.