IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SB WRIT PETITION (S) N0§c~3§ /2Q1Q PPTITIONER ‘Smt‘ Prema Devi Pathak W/o Shri. Kaushal Kishore Pathak, aged about 46 years, Working as Incharge Pri§ipal (upper division teacher) Mata Rukmani Adivashi Girls Higher Secondary School, Dimarapal,District—BastadCG) VERSUS r“ _ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Schedule Caste, Schedule Tribe and Backward Class Welfare Department, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, District—Raipur(CG) / Tribal Welfare Department District—Baum (C G) RESPONDENTS 2. The Commissioner, x i/ 3. Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department K District-Bastar (CG) f, 4. Joint Director, (Accounts) Treasury and Pension, District—Bastar (CG) ON OF lNDlA FOR WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTI AT_HE ISSUANCE MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER WRIT ORDER OR DIRECTIONS its oFPMED FIT— ' y 1. Particulars of the Petitioner- . As mentioned in the ea‘use title. ‘ V :mwfaw mmm Wim§wm‘ %3imm' wKV‘ IETINKER BIWAKER SB : EEQM’BLE MR. aiUgTKjE PE 93.G9.2010 , Stata‘ is that though he 1's entitled for same has not been passed on mite that oumber of identical lis‘Court where the petitioners resentation, copy of one such ner as Anneuxrs P—6. Shri Azad Sidctiqui, counsail for tha pétitioner. Shyi Ajit Smgh, R L. far m: Grievance of the petitioner two advance increments but fhe to him' for no reasons. He sui: matters have been decided by t have been permitted to f11e a rev onier has been filed by the petiti Counsel for the petitione the Supreme Court in the cas MP. 35 others, 2009 {In} MPJ mis Court m the ease of Yas Municipal Corporation, Burg 96 and in the case of Saii Chhattisgarh 8s Others, W.P.{ of two advance increments haS B.E‘d. degree was obtained, is o yetitioner, as the circujars sou who had obtained BEdl BTf A further submits that he may submits that the judgmeat of of AshaV‘fSaxena Vs. state of {SCE 59 ami orders passed by want Kumax Bhaxadwag Vs. Aeother, 2006 (2} MPJR—CJ‘ Kant Singh Vs. State of Nm625’?! 0$; wherein benetit een granted, on the basis that o appiieabie to the case of the ht to extend- EéeneEt to those “ling, iike the petitioner. He ‘ e permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to ma e representation before the WWWW N @(§>-£\ b%i§ mm (W) WWW ‘ mm Wm . (>h ’ amimm \ \ \ ‘ On the other hand, counsel. for tjhe Stats submits that he as no objection if the petitione‘ ma1(!es a representation ami he same s aiecided 1'11 accordanbetwith law. t i In, Vw of above, the petiti mer is permittai to withdraw this petitin wit iiberty to iiée representation before the rpondent 03 a in tum 1116 reepomlent NO 1s expectee to id e Sd/- , Pritinker Diwaker Judge o h es N nd (iece the represntatioe so fwxi, m accordance “71th law. \ WW h ie