1 (Crim appln 3560 of 2010) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3560 OF 2010 Rajesh Laxman Mahale and Anr. ...Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents ----- Mr.J.M. Puranik for Applicants Mrs.R.V. Newton -APP for the State Mr.G.R. Sawant for Respondent No.2 ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 10TH AUGUST, 2010 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner, Respondent No.2 and the learned APP for the State. 2. This application has been filed by the Applicants for quashing the criminal complaint filed by the Respondent No.2 for the offence punishable under section 498-A r/w. 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The Respondent No.2 has now filed her affidavit in reply, wherein she has stated that she has no objection if the said complaint is quashed. She has also stated that after the compliant was lodged, the 2 (Crim appln 3560 of 2010) Applicant no.1 returned back to the home and started co-habiting with her and now they have started living matrimonial life happily along with their children. 4. The Respondent No.2 is present in the Court and she has also reiterated that whatever stated in the affidavit is correct and that she has no objection if the complaint is quashed. 5. In view of the affidavit in reply filed by the Respondent No.2,in my view, this is a fit case for quashing both the said complaint filed by the Respondent No.2. 6. Application is, therefore, allowed in terms of the prayers clause (c) and is disposed of. (V.M. KANADE J.)