IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31439 of 2010 DEEPAK KUMAR son of Arun Kumar @ Bhorosi Singh, R/o Rupastola Babu Chedi Singh, P.S.- Athmalgola, District-Patna. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 26.3.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Indu Bala Pandey, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. The sole petitioner, who apprehends his arrest in connection with Athmalgola P.S. Case No.87 of 2010 registered for the offence under section 307 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act, has prayed for grant of anticipatory bail. Accusation against the petitioner, as per the first information report, is that he firstly teased the niece of the informant and on objection being raised he assaulted the informant’s husband by rod. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that prior to filing of the present case, as per the fardbeyan of the mother of the petitioner, first information report was lodged against the informant side. It was further submitted that the petitioner is a student of B.A. Part-II and, as such, he may be extended privilege of anticipatory bail. After going through the first information report, the court is of the opinion that it is not a fit case for extending privilege of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is rejected. It is made clear that if the petitioner surrenders in the 2 court below and prays for grant of regular bail, the court below without being prejudiced by this order will examine the case on its own merit and pass order in accordance with law. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)