1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.614/2009 The Jharkhand Colliery Mazdoor Union Vs. Union of India and others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. CORAM : A.P. LAVANDE AND P.D. KODE, JJ. DATED : 29th JULY, 2009. Heard Ms. Deshpande, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Choubey, learned counsel for respondent no.1 and Mr. Anilkumar, learned counsel for respondent nos. 3 and 4. None for other respondents. By this petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:- (i) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action on the part of the Respondents in issuing letter dated 22.1.2009 (Annexure D) and 31.1.2009 (Annexure C) as illegal and arbitrary and against the provisions of law; (ii)grant stay to the effect and operation of letter dated 22.1.2009 and 31.1.2009 during the pendency of this petition; (iii)direct the respondents to release full salary of its employees for the month of January 2009. 2 Mr. Anilkumar, learned counsel places reliance upon the judgment of the Apex Court in Syndicate Bank Vs. K. Umesh Nayak : 1004 DGLS (Soft.)831 and submits that the remedy under Industrial Disputes Act is available to the petitioner in respect of the grievances made in the petition. We find that the grievance made in the petition have to be adjudicated under the Industrial Disputes Act and the Act provides adequate remedy to the petitioner, which is a registered Union. On this ground, we are not inclined to entertain this petition. Accordingly, the petition is rejected on the ground of availability of remedy under the Industrial Disputes Act. JUDGE JUDGE Ambulkar.