THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.6774 of 2010 Dated:30.03.2010 Between: Muddireddy Chinna Obul Reddy. …Petitioner and The District Collector, Kadapa District, Kadapa, And others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.6774 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner was assigned land admeasuring Ac.0.49 cents in survey No.53 and Acs.0.57 cents in survey No.56 by proceedings of the third respondent dated 30.05.2005. The petitioner statedly is cultivating the land. He alleges that the Officials from the Offices of the third and fourth respondents visited the property to conduct the survey and demarcation of the land. The petitioner then made enquiries and found that the first respondent issued proceedings dated 01.02.2010 directing the second respondent to send proposals for alienation of land admeasuring Acs.11.39 (out of Acs.48.66 cents) in survey Nos.45 to 60 in favour of Kadapa Municipal Corporation. The first respondent also directed the second respondent to handover advance possession of the lands to Kadapa Municipal Corporation pending finalization of alienation proposals. Therefore, the petitioner filed the instant writ petition seeking to restrain the respondents from taking possession of the lands as illegal. The matter was called on 26.03.2010. Assistant Government Pleader after getting instructions made submissions that the writ petition is filed on a mere apprehension and there is no attempt to dispossess the petitioner. To enable the Assistant Government Pleader to get written instructions the matter was adjourned. Today she has placed before this Court a message received by the Government Pleader by way of fax. It is stated therein that no notice was issued to the petitioner, that the petitioner’s name was not found in the official records in survey Nos.53 and 56, and therefore, notice was not served, and that notices were already issued to other pattadars vide office Reference No.B/416/2008 dated 24.12.2009. It is also stated that the land admeasuring Ac.1.06 cents in survey Nos.56 and 57 stands in the name of Sri Singamalla Pitchi Reddy, S/o.Konda Reddy, and that the petitioner’s name is not found in the revenue records. The petitioner has annexed the Xerox copy of the D-Form patta issued to the petitioner by the Tahsildar. He has also filed the Xerox copy of the pattadar pass book for patta No.8 showing the petitioner to be in possession of the land. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent Nos.2 and 3 to verify from the records and take necessary action after issuing notice to the petitioner. It shall be open to the petitioner to approach the third respondent with a copy of this order and produce copies of the pattadar pass books. Till the same is done if the petitioner is in possession he shall not be dispossessed from the land without following due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 30.03.2010 vs