1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.515 OF 2004 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.21 OF 2004 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.261 OF 2000 Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. ...Applicants/Petitioners. vs. M/s.Unique Integrated Transport & Management Consultants P. Ltd. ... Respondents. --- Mr.S.I.Shah, for Applicants. Dr.K.K.Khanna, for Respondents. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH,J. DATED: 26th April,2005 P.C.:- 1. The principal relief claimed by this Chamber summons is to set aside the execution order dated 28.1.2004. However, copy of that order is not annexed to the affidavit filed in support of chamber summons. Though the chamber summons has been taken out in March, 2004, till today no attempt has 2 been made to place copy of that order on record of this chamber summons. I asked the learned Counsel for the applicants who has taken out this chamber summons, to hand over a copy of order dated 28.1.2004 which she wants to be set aside, but she is not in a position to show that order. It obviously shows that the applicants who have taken out this chamber summons are extremely casual about the chamber summons. They have no real intention to prosecute the present chamber summons. Hence, the present chamber summons is disposed of for non-prosecution. ---