1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.247 OF 2009 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.493 OF 2007 Sanjay Maruti Jadhav & Anr. .... Applicants Vs. Amit Tatoba Sawant .... Respondent Shri Sachin S. Pande for the Applicants. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: JULY 2, 2010 P.C: By this application the applicants seek condonation of delay in preferring this application for restoration, as also for restoration of Civil Revision Application No. 493 of 2007 which was dismissed for want of prosecution on account of failure of the applicants to serve the unserved respondents within the time granted. Notice of this application has been served upon the respondent who is shown to be represented by Advocate A.P. Sathe. The respondent has filed his reply to the civil application raising serious objections to the restoration of the civil 2 revision application. However, considering the reasons given in the application, and after hearing the learned counsel for the applicants, who alone is present in the Court, the application is allowed, subject to the applicants paying to the respondent costs in the sum of Rs.5,000/- within a period of eight weeks, failing which the application would be deemed to be rejected. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)