(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 9811 OF 2010 Dilip Raghunath Patil, Age : 55 years, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Vivare (Kh.), Taluka : Raver, District : Jalgaon. .. Petitioner. versus The State of Maharashtra, Through its Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Yawal, Taluka : Yawal, Dist. : Jalgaon, and 4 others. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. Vijay B. Patil, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.1. Mr. H.S. Bedi, Advocate, for respondent no.2. Respondent nos.3 to 5 served (Absent). ........................ (2) CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 17TH FEBRUARY 2011 COURT'S ORDER : 1. Adv. Mr. Bedi, for respondent no.2 / Society, states that the petitioner has deposited the entire loan amount and, therefore, there is no question of impugned RRC being executed against him. He produces on record, photostat copies of communication dated 25-11-2010 given by the petitioner and also a certificate dated 24-11-2010 issued by the Manager of respondent no.2 / Society. Both the documents are taken on record and marked as "X-1" and "X-2" for identification. 2. Adv. Mr. Patil, for the petitioner, is seeking time to obtain instructions in the matter. However, in view of the clear statement made by Adv. Mr. Bedi, it is apparent that the grievance of the petitioner is already redressed. 3. Hence, the petition is disposed of. ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp9811