IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.19788 of 2010 HARBANSH SINGH, SON OF LATE ISHWARDHARI SINGH, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA DIGHI TANK, SOUTH WEST CORNER, POLICE STATION CIVIL LINES, GAYA, DISTRICT GAYA. ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF ROAD CONSTRUCTION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT-CUM-CHIEF VIGILANCE OFFICER, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF, DEPARTMENT OF ROAD CONSTRUCTION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, ROAD CIRCLE, MUNGER, AT & PO MUNGER. 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DIVISION, JAMUI, AT & PO JAMUI. ... ... RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 8.12.2010. Heard Shri Rajeev Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Saroj Kumar Verma, learned A.C. to A.A.G.11. The petitioner, who retired as Junior Engineer from the Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar with effect from 31st July,2001, has prayed for directing the respondents to make payment of all the retiral dues. It was submitted by Shri Rajeev Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner that in the year 1997, an order was passed for recovery of Rs.7,33,585/- as well as for recording of censor in the Service Book of the petitioner, which was challenged by the 2 petitioner vide C.W.J.C. No.10838 of 1998. This Court, by its order dated 16.12.2005, quashed the same. However, it was observed that said order will not prevent the respondents to initiate such proceedings de novo as they may desire for the same purpose in accordance with law. Learned counsel further submits that after the order of this Court vide Annexure-3 i.e. order contained in Memo No.532 dated 12.1.2007, the punishment order dated 16.12.2005, which was imposed earlier on the petitioner, was cancelled. It has been submitted that after the order dated 12.1.2007, no fresh proceeding has been initiated and as such it is necessary for the respondents to redress the grievances of the petitioner in respect of all post retiral dues. With the consent of the parties, this writ petition is being disposed of with a direction to the respondents to redress all the grievances of the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of filing of fresh representation by the petitioner. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to file fresh representation within a period of six 3 N.H./ weeks from today. If such representation is filed, all the grievances of the petitioner must be redressed within a period of two months from the date of filing of such representation. It is made clear that if in view of order dated 16.12.2005 passed in C.W.J.C. No.10838 of 1998 any de novo proceeding has been initiated, then in that event, the order of this Court will not be made effective. With above observation and direction, the petition stands disposed of. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)