1 wp6289.10.sxw ssm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6289 OF 2010 Union of India Through, Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-I .....Petitioner. Vs. M/s. Daffodils Exports & Anr. .....Respondents. Mr. M.I. Sethna, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly and Mr. Jitendra B. Mishra for the Petitioner. Ms. Ankita Singhania with Ms. Shobhana R. Waghmare i/by M/s. Mulani & Co. for the Respondents. CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD AND ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : JUNE 27, 2011 P.C.: Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and the Respondents state that this Petition would be governed by the Judgment delivered today in companion Writ Petition No. 6288 of 2010. For the reasons indicated in the decision rendered in the companion Writ Petition, the present Writ Petition shall stand disposed 2 wp6289.10.sxw ssm of in the same terms by setting aside the order dated 9 February 2010 passed by the Revisional Authority. The proceedings shall stand remitted back to the Revisional Authority for fresh consideration in accordance with the law. The Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. There shall be no order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.)