1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 1261 OF 1992 ( Leelaram through LRs Smt. Gangadevi L. Joshi & Ors. vs. Sharad Vinayak Dixit) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. SEPTEMBER 01, 2008. Heard Shri Chandurkar, Advocate for the revision applicants – tenants and Smt. Joshi, Advocate for the respondent – landlord. The identical controversy has been decided by me just now after hearing same counsel in Civil Revision Application No. 57 of 1992. Here the landlord is same and tenant is different. The facts of tenancy, of land acquisition proceedings, refusal of notice under Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, filing of appeal under Section 96 before the Additional District Judge, Akola, are all common. The only change is in case numbers and exhibit numbers. Civil Application No. 4124 of 2008 is filed here by tenant – applicant with similar prayers as mentioned in earlier matter and that application is opposed by identical reply by the respondent. There is already order on 08.01.1995 for joint 2 consideration of all these matters. In the circumstances, for the reasons recorded in the judgment in Civil Revision Application No. 57 of 1992, the present Civil Revision Application is also dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.