^.^^"^ %^ In the Hoable High Court of Judicature of Chhattishgarh at Bilaspur (C.G.) ^ ..-•"' W.P.No. 4510 2006 •^Si^ ^^>^' i^1" <^..-- '^•' Petitioner Respondents Manoj Kumar Meshram, aged 39 years Son of Late Shri Maniram Meshram, Assistant Teacher, Govt. High School, Village Dangarh, Tribal Block Mohala, District Rajaandgoan (C.G.) Versus 1. The State Govemment of Chhattishgarh, Throughthe Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department Ministry, D.K.S, Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) ,..2. The Education Officer, Mohala District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) .3- B^^« ^ttccititf^ Officfc^ /vlohM O'lS^- RciJn^l^O&^ Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India WRTT m th^ natwe of MAM3AMUS, Suitable writ or writs, order XI-HC-78 *11*1WI aiWcfl 3^ -^WWi, VSiKwKa, (sK'11+fy ^..^tos.co.fp^^ 200 3TT^?T 4^ch (yt^t'iff) Sn^TWfSRR) asir 3n^?r SRTR' Roshan STtTTO: flf^tT 311^1 17.3.2008 Shri Ajay Shrivastava, counsel| Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. Adv.] l-1eard. The oase of the petitioner is th| per the tnstruction dated 24-12-98 Teachers who have passed B.T.1., expenses after 22-10-64 are entitled| passed the B.T.I examination on his that effect is Annexure-P-1, but thel whereas, similariy situated persons 11 under the orders of the Tribunal and tt] Having heard learned counse| and oircumstances of the oase, withol case, the petitioner is allowed to mak^ this petition raising all his grievances from today and in tum, respondent petitioner in the light of averments m^ representation also. ]f respondent N| situated persons have been granted petitioner's case is also covered for g| of Government's order, then to pass d, in accordance with law. With the direction aforesaid, thl Parties are entitled for certifiedl ;tb ttlo. mafcle +l<lf<-l<iT)-< WRft' if fet^t rfoRZR ^sri^Han^r |for the petitioner. ]for the State on advance copy. ^t he is working as Assistant Teacher and as ^sued by the State of M.P., the Assistant B.Ed. and M.Ed. examination on their own |for two advanoe increments. The petitioner cjwn oost in the year 1992 and a certificate to petitioner has not been given the benefit, |ave been granted two advance increments lis Court. for the parties, having regard to the faots |jt expressing any opinion of the merit of the a detaiied representation along with copy of respondent No.2 within a period of 15 days i.2 is directed to examine the case of the by the petitioner in this petition and in the ().2 reaches to the conciusion that similarly l&enefit of two advance increments and the t-ant of two advance increments on the basis (•ders within a period of 3 months from today, i petition stands disposed of. copy of this order. SdA L.C. Qh. 00 juage P.T.O.