rr- ^^^^f^" (-i '^ssrL.-^'^ *•**' Aa<e' IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASFUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^&?2_OF 2011 PETmONER RESPONDENTS 1. Shailendra Kumar Meshram, S/o. Late Shri B.R. Meshram, Aged about 40 years, Assistant Grade-3, R/o New Civil Lines, Quarter No. H-16, Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, TT-u-ough - Secretary, Department of Veterinary Development, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipui (C.G.) 2. Director, Vetermary Services, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3. Deputy Director, Veterinary Services, BUaspui, District-BUaspui (C.G.) 4. Dr. R. P. Sonwane, Deputy Director, Veterinary Services, Bilaspur, District-BUaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THECQNSTTTUnQN OF INDIA XI-HC—78 3n^?T ^T [<'ii<ti '^R 3!fT^T sti*lich ^ *ii*i^i a»Hra» 'S^ -^nwi, ®flly'!<»,ftdl-y^ ..^.S^1...S^:...^^[200 CT^T tISfaF (lj°li^«l<^r) TOiiwnferai^r • VSfVSSVVfS.W IkffO .T?¥<&Tl?«ntKt»toTfT>7MlflKOT\ !•; S^s.^fW.QitSBf 3SliS%^ vS]U0^t'^rS:it__^p Shrivast^va Shri Chandresh Shri A.V.Shridhar, P.L. fot Challenge in the 12.7.2011 (Annexure P/l) pass^d Services, Rajnandgaon whereby) suspension. Contention of the counsj there being any basis, on frivol^ put under suspension. Oh the other hand, S( petitioner has an altemative Director and as such the present At this sta^e, counsel for petition with liberty to appixsactj submits that the appellate autl of the petitioner expeditiously. Accordingly, the petition] eventuality of filing appeal by tt|e date of receipt of copy of this decide the same as expeditiousl^- It is rnade clear that this on the merits of the case and liberty to decide the appeal stricf <»)Tqf^Tiftl *iWV^ tf fSX3t' <^*1+^.1< ^siRnsn^t ?a, counsel for the petitioner. t'ne State. prese^it petition is to the order dated by the Deputy Director, Veterinary the petitioner has been put under il for the petitioner is that without >us charges, the petitioner has been tate counsel ^oints 'out that the ^emedy of filing appeat before the petition is premature. the petitioner wants to withdraw this the appellate authority. He however ithjarity be directed to decide the appeat is dismissed as withdrawn. In the \e petitioner within ten days frc>m the lorder, the appellate authority shaU as possible in accordance with law. |Court has not expressed any opinion authority conoemed would be at tly in accordance with iaw._ ttie pritiB^er Judge ^