IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 10442 of 2005 Between: P.Shravan Kumar, S/o.Late Sri.P.Ramdas, R/o.SRT 1008, Sanathnagar, Hyderabad, ..... PETITIONER AND 1 State of A.P. Rep by its Station House Officer, Sanjeevareddinagar Police Station, Hyderabad. 2 Narra Srisaila Mallikarjuna Prasad Rao. S/o.Kutumba Rao, R/o.H.No.A-48, Madhuranagar ,Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to May be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly more in the nature of writ of certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the FIR issued in Crime No.64/2005 dt.27-1-2005 on the file of the P.S Sanjeevareddinagar, Hyderabad and quash the same as illegal in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.D.GOVERDHANACHARY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Mr.C.Pratap Reddy The Court made the following : ORDER Petitioner seeks to issue a writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the FIR in Crime No.64 of 2005 dated 27.1.2005 on the file of the Sanjeevarreddinagar Police Station, Hyderabad. Admittedly, the petitioner filed criminal petition No.892 of 2005 on the file of this Court to quash the said crime and this Court dismissed the same on merits by an order dated 16.3.2005. I have perused the FIR. As per the contents of the FIR, the petitioner induced to believe that he is the owner of the land and fraudulently obtained 5.5 lakhs and cheated the complainant. Therefore, a case was registered for the offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. On the private complaint, the case was referred to the police for investigation and basing on that, the FIR was registered. Unless the police completes the investigation and files the charge sheet and the trial is concluded, it cannot be said that the petitioner has not committed any offence at this stage of the proceedings. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any merits in the writ petition and the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. _________ 19-06-2008 rkk ... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. Narra Srisaila Mallikarjuna Prasad Rao. S/o.Kutumba Rao, R/o.H.No.A-48, Madhuranagar ,Hyderabad. 2.2CD copies