IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.189 of 2011 SHARWAN RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. ----------- 02 14.02.2011 Re. I.A. No. 307 of 2011 After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, application seeking condonation of delay is allowed. Petitioner was allowed to make submission on merit of the application. Heard. Petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 01.10.2010, passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Kaimur (Bhabua) in maintenance case no. 100(M) of 2009, whereby on a consideration of the materials on record including the show cause filed by the husband, it has been found that the petitioner was legally obliged in view of the materials on record to maintain the wife and the two minor children and accordingly ad-interim maintenance for a sum of Rs. 1500/- (Fifteen hundred) per month has been directed to be paid for maintenance of the wife and two minor children. It appears that petitioner was afforded opportunity and whereafter the order impugned was passed after having found that basic facts are not in dispute. Since the order is ad-interim in nature, this Court is not inclined to interfere therewith. The whole issue is open before the Court. Petitioner shall have liberty to raise all the said issues, which shall be considered at the time of final disposal of the application. This Court, however, clarifies that fixing of ad- 2 interim maintenance by the order impugned shall not prejudice the parties at the time of final adjudication of the case. Sym/ ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)