BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Fourth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN CRL OP(MD) No.13462 of 2011 TAMILENTHI ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NAGAMALAI PUDHUKOTTAI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.344/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.BALAKARTHICK Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner prays for the grant of bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for the alleged offence punishable under Section 392 of IPC in Crime No.344 of 2011, on the file of the respondent-Police. 2. Heard Mr.S.Balakarthick, Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also Mr.A.Ramar, Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the State. 3. The case of the prosecution is that there are four accused in this case and on the date of occurrence when the de-facto complainant was in his wine shop, A-1 along with other accused came to the shop and demanded brandy without giving money and a wordy altercation ensued and later, A-1 took the brandy bottles in the shop. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the second accused and he has been arrested on 22.09.2011 for the alleged offence under Section 392 of IPC and he has been falsely implicated in this case. 5. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submits that the petitioner is the second accused and he has been arrested on 22.09.2011 and the investigation is almost over. 6. It is seen that the petitioner is the second accused and he is undergoing the incarceration right from 22.09.2011 and coupled with the fact that the petitioner has not suffered any previous conviction, this Court is of the view that no prejudice would be caused to the prosecution in the event of his release on bail. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 7. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on condition that he execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two Government sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.6, Madurai and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police until further orders. sd/- 04/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.VI, MADURAI. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NAGAMALAI PUDHUKOTTAI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. 5. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. JEGADEESH PANDIYAN, Advocate SR.No.34679 SR : 04.10.2011 : 2P/7C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13462 of 2011 Date :04/10/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/