ct E'WJ‘ H/ $§N§i§ §SWW IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR [c.GJ WRIT PETITION No. Z78 8 /2006 / PETITIONER Vishwanath Prasad Yadav S/o Dayaram Yadav, Aged—about 7O years, R/o $v “g ¥W ' ‘6 ~ 4. BlockVEducatlon . Officer Block— Palngarh, Distt.— Janjgir— Champa [C.G.] WRIT PETITION UNDErR ARTICLE 226 227 OF TH R CONSTITUTION OF INDIA E ? c‘VG§Q ‘ Shiavarinarayan, Distt.— Janjgir— QQZQE9§W Champa [Cm ‘ ?::\e{w”‘ VERSUS / 1.State of Chhattisgarh Through— Secretary Education Department D.K.S..Bhawan, Raipur [C.G.] Qg‘k / 2.Acc0untant General fji' Qg‘ Raipur [c.G.] z /‘:\§$’* \ ($8 / 3.District Education Officer (3C?) ' C: W XI—HC-78 3am,m,m WW H. p “.m. .. .. m 200 WW(W) mam m . . WWW mmm £§w§i “a” 15.6.2006:- Heard Shri S.K. Guha, counse for the petitioner. Shri Ashutosh' Kachchwaha G.A. takes notice for the State/ respondents No.1. 3 and 4. C Shri S.K, Beriwal, Standing ' teéin$e¢d £36unsei for the p iiiioner submitted that GPF amount deducted frorn the salary of ihe peiiii ner has not been paid to the petitioner after his retirement: He retired on 31 10-1996 and even after the lapse of 1O years GPF amounihas not been p id. Counsel further submitted that the de to respondent No.2 but so far , therefore, he prays that respondent No.2 be directed to decide represen ation of the petitioner to which teamed counsel for respondents have no obj ction. Having heard teamed counse for the parties and having regard to the respondent No.2 is directed to decide unsel takes notice for respondent No.2. representation has already been representation has not been deoi facts and circumstances of the ca’ 5 representation made by the petition r. lf the representation is not avaitable with respondent No.2, then the peitioner will be at liberty to make fresh representation to respondent No.2 hin a period of 10 days from today and in turn respondent No.2 shall deci e representation of the petitioner after by the petitioner in the representation considering all the grievances raise within a period of 2 months from the date of receipt of representation‘ in accordance with law. With the direction aforesaid, he petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.)P. No. 2120/2006 and LA. No.5539/2006 also stand disposed of. Parties are entitled for certified copy of this order. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge a d s t