IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43633 of 2008 KARU YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.11.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. This Court earlier by an order dated 14.5.2008 in Cr.Misc.No. 8491/2008 had rejected the prayer for bail of the petitioner. The reasoned order passed in that case would only go to show that this Court was not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner because of his involvement/ complicity. No fresh ground has been raised for grant of bail of the petitioner by Mr. Shivaji Pandey, learned Senior counsel who states and submits that till date in the trial all the six witnesses who have been examined does not support the prosecution case much less have attributed any specific allegation of overt act against the petitioner. This Court having earlier rejected the prayer for bail of the petitioner on merit is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The sessions case of the petitioner is of the year 2008 and therefore, it would be wholly premature to 2 expect immediate conclusion of such trial without affording sufficient opportunity to the prosecution to produce its witnesses. However, keeping in view the fact that six witnesses have already been examined, the trial court is expected to make its endeavor to conclude the trial within a period of next six months from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order. With the aforementioned observation and direction, this application is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/