IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.28454 of 2010 MANOJ SAH son of late Moti Sah Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 12.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was refused bail by order dated 4.1.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No.37569 of 2009 considering that the petitioner was arrested with fire arms and he disclosed that he was involved in kidnapping and also gave status of the kidnapped boy on account of which he was recovered from the house of co-accused Sunil Bhar. While renewing the prayer for bail, the petitioner contended that this court has committed error of record in stating that the petitioner gave confessional statement on account of which the victim was recovered and for this reason, the case diary was called for and it is once again verified. In para 82, it is noted that the petitioner had confessed when he was arrested with arms and it is on his statement and the statement of other co-accused that the victim was recovered from the house co-accused Sunil Bhar. In view of such, this application is once again rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trail in view of the serious nature of the offence. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)