§GH COURT OF CHHATTISQARH BILASPUR ‘ , WntPetmomswo 955 orzoos Petitioner . Jagdish Prasad Sahu Slo. Late Dharamia! Sahu, g ' ‘ aged about 39 y ars, Assxs’tant Teacher g presermy posted at G vernment Primary Same; ‘ V Malhar Rio Village Kors: PS Shmnnarayan Tahsil Pamgarh Dlstrct Janjglr Champa (CG) Versus Réépondents 1) State of Chhamsgam through the aecretary, l 3 Department of School Educatlon DKS Bhawan ’Dlstt Ralpur (CG) 2) The District Eduction omcer Bllaspur Dlstrlct ‘ V Bllespur (CG) 3)} The, Black Educatlo’h Officer, Masturi,’ Dietrict Bilaspur (CG). (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Conetltution of lndla) sB: Hon’blé Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: i I / Shrl Santcsh Sahu counsel for the petitioner \ Shri U N S Deo Govt Advocate forthe State ORAL ORDER .~ (Passed on 15'“ February, 2008) Learned counsel appearing for the 'pet'rtioner submits that the petitioner has obtained D.Ed., Examination Certificate tin the year:1997 on his own expenses. Learned counsel, further submits that the issue involved asto whether a Teacher havingB.Ed./D.EdllM.Ed./‘B.T.l., is entitled to grant of two advance increments as per circulars dated 24-1 2—1998 and 1-3—1 999. Learned counsel further submits that this very issue Is no ionger res Integra as the same has been settled by this Court in the matter of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs Municipal Corporation, Durg and another {2006 (II) MPJR -CG 96}, as well as by decrsion dated 15—12 2006 in ,Gopesh Kumar Verma Vs The state Govt of Chhattlsgarh and another (Writ " Petition (a) No. 4130 of 2005). 2) v On perusal of the pleadings and documents appended thereto, it appears that the issue involved here hasalready been considered in the matters of Yashwant I a“ -q.~~~W~M~Vwmxmv:mWVw‘mmwwv .yyyyyy ‘ x§" :i L . Ku § i i 1 1 i ! xn;ar Bharawaj and Gopesh Kumar Ve‘rma ( lupra and the same has attained ina!ity as no Chailenge has been made to the said decisions n any suerior Court. i. :i ed i t p i in View o the above, this petition is aii f o n he Same terms i.e,, the etitioner is entitied to two advance increments frorl E i d i the ae of declaration of DEd er as to costs. W Satish K. Agnt d Juge xarintnation Certificate, subjeet to verification of thJ facts. No or , “ d ) f i p 3) dt , fi ihert /}’ i