IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15759 of 2009 ASHOK YADAV @ ASHOK KUMAR YADAV, Son of Ram Udgar Yadav, resident of village – Balkatwa, P.S. Basopatti, District – Madhubani. … Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. Sunaina Devi, Wife of Ashok Yadav, daughter of Nandlal Yadav, resident of village – Balkatwa P.S. Basopatti, District – Madhubani, at present resident of village – Kadwahi (Basopatti), P.S. Basopatti, District – Madhubani. …. Opp. Parties. ----------- 04/ 18.12.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. Case has been instituted for offence under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 379 of the IPC and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act. Marriage in between the petitioner and the informant was solemnized in the year, 2005. Allegation has been made for demand of dowry. Counsel for the petitioner submits that allegations are false and petitioner is very much dissatisfied with the activities of his wife, who is not living properly with her husband. In the case diary also the statement of witnesses supports the case of the petitioner. Considering these facts, prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner, namely, Ashok Yadav @ Ashok Kumar Yadav is allowed. He is directed to be released on - 2 - anticipatory bail, in case of his appearance before the Court concerned within four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No. 121 of 2008 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani. Petitioner as well as informant has option to resolve their dispute out side the court. In case both the parties are agreeable they should start living together. DKS/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)