IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.566 of 2004 M/S Aman Coke Plant Pvt. Ltd. through its Managing Director, Parmeshwar Prasad son of Sri Harihar Prasad, Industrial Area, Aurangabad, P.O. & P.S. and District- Aurangabad -----Writ petitioner ---- Appellant. Versus 1. The Bharat Coking Coal Limited through its Chairman- cum-Managing Director, Koyala Bhawan, Koyala Nagar, Dhanbad. 2. The Coal India Limited through its Regional Sales Manager (Sales and Marketing), Azad Bhawan, Sri Krishnapuri, Patna ---- Respondents --- Respondents. ------------- 4. 25.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the appellant, and learned counsel for the respondents. This appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent of the High Court of Judicature at Patna raises a grievance with respect to the order dated 12.3.2004, passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court, in C.W.J.C. No. 1835 of 2002( M/S Aman Coke Plant Pvt. Ltd. V. The B.C.C.L. & another), whereby the writ petition along with the analogous writ petitions were disposed of with the direction to the respondent Company to supply coal to the petitioners keeping in view the directions given by the Jharkhand High Court in the case of M/S Maya Fuel Pvt. Ltd. We may make it clear that the impugned order disposed of a large number of writ petitions, and the present appeal is confined to C.W.J.C. No. 1835 of 2002. 2 Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the issues are concluded by an agreement inter-parties. In deed the Supreme Court had taken up the issues in question in the case of Ashoka Smokeless Coal India Limited vs. Union of India, 2007(2) S.C.C. 640, whereby the Union of India was directed to constitute a committee and take a policy decision. The committee so constituted had submitted its report, the policy decision was announced, and the parties have entered into separate agreements. We are convinced that the parties in the present case have also entered a valid agreement arrived at between the parties. In the result, we find that the cause of action for the appeal has dissolved during the pendencny of the present proceedings. It is accordingly disposed of in terms of the agreement inter-parties. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar,J. ) (Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)