IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 19014 of 2006 Dated 15th September, 2006 Between: G.Saidamma W/o Laxmaiah … Petitioner And The Regional Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Nalgonda Region, Nalgonda District A.P. and another. … Respondents ORAL ORDER: The petitioner, who was initially engaged as daily wage conductor in Nalgonda region, was transferred to Hyderabad Region. It is the grievance of the petitioner that she is a native of Nalgonda District and on the meager income that she gets out of her service, the petitioner is facing lot of financial hardship and is unable to maintain herself in Hyderabad Region. It is also the case of the petitioner that in the same category several others who were allowed to join subsequent to the petitioner were continued in the Nalgonda Region, which is the unit of appointment as per the regulations. However, without any reason, the services of the petitioner were transferred to Hyderabad Region. Learned counsel for the petitioner also placed reliance on similar orders passed by this court directing continuance of the incumbents in the units of appointment, in similar such circumstances. As much as the petitioner is not appointed to any regular post, she has no right to continue in service. But, however, as it is stated that there is also such practice of engaging casual conductors in Nalgonda Region and several other persons who were appointed subsequent to the petitioner are being continued in such category, I dispose of the writ petition by setting aside order dated 11.4.2003. The first respondent is directed to allow the petitioner to discharge as daily wage conductor, subject to availability of work in the Nalgonda region by following the seniority maintained for such category of employees. Subject to above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ______________________ 15.9.2006 (R.SUBHASH REDDY, J.) VR