1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.5054 OF 1998 Smt.Ranjanben Mugatlal Shah .. Plaintiff Versus Ramniklal T. Shah and Ors. .. Defendants Mr.S.Momin for plaintiff Mr.Sunil Patel i/b. Sunil & Co. for respondents Mr.A.Bagla for defendant Nos.2, 3 and 4. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 28th January 2009. P.C. . Mentioned not on board. 2. In a suit for possession of suit room/ premises, the parties have arrived at a settlement which is recorded in the consent terms. 2. It is recorded that the defendant Nos. 2 and 3 in their individual capacity so also as 2 heirs of defendant No.1 have surrendered their right, title and interest in the suit premises. As far as original defendant No.4 is concerned, it is stated that their rights are taken over by the present defendant Nos. 5 and 6 and, therefore, the original defendant No.4 be deleted. The chamber summons is also taken out for amending the plaint, which can also be made absolute by consent as stated in the consent terms. 3. Parties have fully understood the consequences and implications flowing from the terms. They state that the premises are surrendered voluntarily and without any force. Even the consideration has been determined and fixed with consent. It is stated that the defendant Nos. 2 and 3 have realised that the consent terms being signed and an order being passed in terms thereof would mean that their rights in the premises would automatically come 3 to an end. Therefore, all of them are present in court. The consent terms duly signed by Advocates and parties, who are present in court, are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. Order in terms of consent terms. No costs. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)