IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.1213 of 2006. Ravindra Kumar Jain son of Shri J.D. Jain VERSUS The State of Rajasthan through P.P. & Another Date of Order :::: 06/02/2009. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhanwaroo Khan Mr. Bhupender Pareek, on behalf of Mr. Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, Counsel for the Petitioner Mr. K.S. Chandel, Public Prosecutor for the State Mr. Rajendra Arora, Counsel for the respondent No.2. By the Court : An F.I.R., was lodged against the petitioner viz., Ravindra Kumar Jain, while he was working on the post of Head Cashier in the Punjab National Bank at Jawli (Alwar) from 1997 to 2003 for committing fraud and for wrongfully misusing the money by committing forgery, credited entries in various accounts of the customers. The Police after investigation, submitted a charge-sheet against the petitioner. The trial Court i.e. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Laxmangarh, Alwar vide its order dated 27.09.2005 framed charges for commission of the offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 409 and 380 of the I.P.C. against the petitioner. An unsuccessful revision preferred by the petitioner came to be rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge,, Laxmangarh, Alwar vide its order dated 01.06.2006, against which the petitioner has moved this miscellaneous petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., for quashing of the charge as well as revisional Courts orders. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned orders passed by the trial Court. After completion of investigation, the Police has come to a conclusion against the petitioner regarding commission of offence and the trial Court relying upon the statements and the documents, so submitted, has framed charges. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner could not point out any illegality, infirmity or perversity in the impugned orders passed the lower Court as well as of the revisional Court. At the time of framing of the charge, the trial Court can only look into the evidence tendered by the prosecution agency and not beyond that. The total case, prima-facie reveals that no illegality has been committed by the trial Court while framing charges against the petitioner for the aforesaid offences. Neither any prejudice is caused to the petitioner nor any interference is called for in the impugned orders by this Court while exercising the inherent powers under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. There is no merit in this petition and it deserves to be dismissed. Consequently, the criminal miscellaneous petition stands dismissed. (Bhanwaroo Khan) J. ashok/