IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19087 of 2009 1. MAHASUNDARI DEVI 2. Vimal Thakur Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 01.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that if really informant’s son and one Md. Ashique were kidnapped and sold then it was Vinay Thakur, who took the boys. Further, it appears that neither any force was used, nor it was otherwise victim boys separately allured, rather they were taken for their engagement in some job but petitioners, being mother and brother of Vinay Thakur, have also been involved in the case and they are apprehending their arrest. Further, there is no allegation against the petitioners for the offence under Section 3(1)(x) of S.C./S.T. Act. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Paru P.S. Case No. 169 of 2005, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Muzaffarpur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)