AB 1763/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.MUSAHARY Heard Mr. T.J.Mahanta, learned counsel for the accused/petitioner and Mrs. B.Sai kia, learned Addl. P.P. Assam. It is stated that the accused/petitioner is living separately wi th his family members which is two and half Kms away from the house of the dece ased. I have perused the case diary as produced by the learned Addl P. P. Assam. Although the accused/petitioner has been named in the FIR along with o thers, there is no such material against the accused/petitioner warranting refus al of pre-arrest bail to him. Moreover, it is found that other co-accused perso ns, like father-in-law, mother-in-law and sister-in-law of the deceased have bee n enlarged on bail. However, the husband of the deceased is still absconding. Th e accused/petitioner being a family holder and permanent resident of the localit y, I am of the considered opinion that release of the accused/petitioner on pre -arrest bail will not cause any adverse effect in the investigation of the case In view of the above, the interim bail granted by this Court on 20.6.11 to the accused/petitioner, Sri Mahendra Das is made absolute on the same terms and conditions. The accused/petitioner shall appear before the I.O. within 10 da ys from today for recording his statement. The bail application stands disposed of.