1 Cri.Appln.No.1006/2011 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1006/2011. ( Shailesh Uttam Pawar Vs. The State of Maharashtra ) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. BS Kudale, Adv. for Applicant; Mr. KM Suryawanshi, APP for State. *** CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 11 th April, 2011. ... 1) Heard finally. 2) In crime No.2/2011 registered at Sengaon police station district Hingoli, the accused/applicant seeks pre-arrest bail for an offence under Sections 420, 468, 469, 471 r/w 34 of Indian Penal Code. 3) The accused/applicant claims to be a law student, allegedly he has prepared a forged Caste Certificate and personally submitted the same to SDO, Hingoli, including Income Certificate. However, Mr. Kudale informs, it was not so, as the accused/applicant was already having a Caste Certificate issued on 7th January, 2011, showing his caste and Non-creamy layer certificate Part-B. There was no reason for the accused/applicant to move the SDO for purported certificate. I find substance 2 Cri.Appln.No.1006/2011 in the same. This has been so, even in the ground raised in the application and also informed that somebody interested to sabotage the future prospects of the applicant/accused, has forged the document and produced them before the SDO, Hingoli. At this stage, custodial interrogation in the situation referred above of the accused/applicant, not warranted. Interim protection dated 11th March, 2011, with attendance conditions is made absolute. The conditions to remain in force till 30th June, 2011. 4) Criminal Application allowed as above. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/