(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 132 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 132 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 132 OF 2004 Vasant Rama Pardeshi & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents ..... None for the petitioner. Mr. D.A. Patil, A.G.P.for State. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 26TH APRIL, 2005 DATED: 26TH APRIL, 2005 DATED: 26TH APRIL, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. It is noticed quite often that the registry has been registering the contempt petitions inspite of the fact that the names of the respondents/ alleged contemnors are not set out in the petition memo and this is one of many such cases. This contempt petition has been filed in the year 2003, registered in the year 2004 and come up for admission in the year 2005 and now it is noticed hat it could not have been registered. 2. The petition cannot be entertained in the present form and therefore, the same is rejected. 3. The Registrar (Judicial) is directed to take a note of the above observations and issue appropriate orders. *****