IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Stay Application No.3919 of 2010 In Writ Petition No.807 of 2010 (M/S) Vikram Jan Kalyan Seva Samiti and another. ……Petitioners. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. ….Respondents. Mr. Gopal Narain, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Addl. C.S.C. for the State-respondents. Dated: -21-05-2010 Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have sought following relefs:- (I) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned decision of Regional Transport Authority Dehradun dated 12-11- 2009 passed in Resolution No. 7 and order dated 12/13-4-2010 passed by the Secretary RTA Dehradun. (II) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No.5 to permit the members of petitioner union to replace their vehicle (permit) on Euro-2 Model Vikram as the Euro-3, LPG or CNG vehicles (Vikrams) are not available at present. (III) Any other order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. (IV) Award the cost of the petition. 2 The grievance of the petitioners is that despite direction of the Transport Commissioner, the respondent No.3 i.e. State Transport Authority, Dehradun is not taking decision pursuant to the order of Transport Commissioner. This Court is not the executing court. The representation, which was made by the petitioners on 16-4-2010, does not refer the order of the Transport Commissioner. It is the authority who may take decision pursuant to the Government Order dated 01-04-2005 If the petitioner has any grievance he may approach to the authority concerned for redressal of their grievance. The writ petition is devoid of merit and is liable to be dismissed. The writ petition is dismissed. Stay application stands disposed of accordingly. (B.S.Verma, J.) 21-05-2010 MK