In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh C.R. No.5548 of 2006. Date of decision:23-10-2006 Bali Ram ..........Petitioner Versus Bhola Ram ..........Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Vinod K.Sharma Present: Mr.Sanjay Mittal, Advocate, for the petitioner. VINOD K.SHARMA,J. (ORAL) The present revision petition has been filed against the order dated 29-09-2006 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr.Divn.), Rewari, vide which the evidence of the plaintiff-petitioner herein has been closed by order as on the date fixed three PWs were present, who were examined and no other witness was present. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has to examine two more witnesses. Without going into the merits of the case, the interest of justice would be served if the petitioner is granted only one opportunity to lead his entire evidence. Accordingly, the revision petition is allowed and the Civl Revision No.5548 of 2006 impugned order is set aside. The petitioner is granted one opportunity to lead his entire evidence on the date to be fixed by the trial Court. However, this shall be subject to payment of Rs. 5,000/- as costs. October 23, 2006 (VINOD K.SHARMA) 'dls' JUDGE Civl Revision No.5548 of 2006