IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 11TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 22ND MAGHA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 153 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ JUDGEMENT IN WPC.24013/2009 PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. JOSE WILFRED, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O. P.E. LAWRENCE, U.D.CLERK, M.I. CENTRAL CIRCLE, ERNAKULAM NOW WORKING AT KOTTUVALLY GRAMA PANCHAYATH. 2. RATHI.V.J.,AGED 476 YEARS, W/O. GOVINDAN NAMBOOTHIRI, U.D.CLERK, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEERS OFFICE, MINOR IRRIGATION CENTRAL CIRCLE, ERNAKULAM NOW WORKING AT BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, EDAPPALLY BLOCK, KUSUMAGIRI.P.O., KAKKANADU ERNAKULAM. 3. P.K.RAJENDRAN, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O. KRISHNAN, U.D.CLERK, M.V.I.P.DIVISION NO.1, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI, NOW WORKING AT POTHANICADU GRAMA PANCHAYATH. 4. SUBASH THAMPURAN, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O. LATE A NIYAN THAMPURAN, U.D. CLERK, IRRIGATION SUB DIVISION, ERNAKULAM NOW WORKING AT CHERANELLOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH. BY ADVS. SRI.P.SANTHOSH KUMAR (PANAMPALLI NAGAR) SRI.LUIZ GODWIN D'COUTH SRI.K.P.CHANDRASEKHAR RESPONDENT(S)/1ST RESPONDENT: --------------- SRI. S.M.VIJAYANAND, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. ANU SIVARAMAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------- C.O.(C). NO. 153 OF 2010 IN W.P.(C) NO.24013 OF 2009 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of February, 2010 JUDGMENT As per the judgment dated 7.9.2009, this Court directed the first respondent to consider Ext.P6 and pass orders thereon. This C.O.C has been filed alleging non-compliance with the aforesaid direction. When the matter was taken up for admission, the learned Government Pleader furnished a copy of the order in G.O(RT)459/10/LGD dated 9.2.2010. The said order revealed that the direction in the judgment dated 7.9.2009 has been complied with, and, in fact order favourable to the petitioner has been passed. In the circumstances, the Contempt Case is closed. (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) spc C.O.(C). NO.153 IN W.P.(C).NO.24013/2009 2 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. C.O.C. NO.153/2010 IN W.P.(C).NO.24013/2009 JUDGMENT 11th February, 2010