IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 16TH DECEMBER 2011 / 25TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 32572 of 2011(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- GEORGE, S/O.NOBERT, AGED 22, PILLATH VEEDU, THRIKKADAVOOR, KUREEPUZHA, KOLLAM-1. BY ADV. SRI.AJAYA KUMAR. G RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM, PIN-691001. 3. THE HUZUR SHERISTADAR & STATE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, COLLECTORATE, KOLLAM, PIN-691001. 4. SUPERINTEND OF POLICE KOLLAM, OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM, PIN-691001. SR GP M.J.RAJASHREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 32572 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED NIL. EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 20-10-2011 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT. /true copy/ P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).32572/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 16th day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT Ext.P2, an order passed by the third respondent under the provisions of the Right to Information Act, declining an information sought for by the petitioner, is under challenge in this writ petition. Ext.P2 is appealable as per the provisions of the Right to Information Act itself. Therefore, I see no reason why the writ petition, challenging such an appealable order should be entertained. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs