BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) Q§¥%‘s~ian Wm M.A.N0. N@ [2005 APPELLANTS 1. , Mandari Bai, Widow of Late CLAIMANTS Rajauram Dhritlahare, aged about 35 years, Ku. Dileshwari, daughter of late Rajauram, aged about 18 years, Ku. Deepa daughter of Late Rajuram Dhritlahare, aged about 12 years (Minor) Domar Singh son of Late Shri Rajuram, aged about 9 years (Minor) Ku. Radha, daughter of Late Rajauram, aged about 7 years (Minor) Appellants No.3 to 5 are minors, through their natural guardian — mother‘ (i.e. the Appellant No.1.) Mandari Bai, widow of Late Rajauram Dhritlahare, aged about 35 years, Kesan Lal aged about 6O years, son of Late Dhansai, 7 ' Bhoori Bai, Wife of Shri ‘Kesan Lal, aged about 58 years rWWWI ‘ A11 are resident of village Alekhuta, Tahsil Kurud, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS / 1/: Damaru Ran; Mahar, son of Shri Faguram, aged about 2O years, resident of Kumharpara, Jagdalpur, Distt. Jagdalpur (C.G.) 2. Smt. Amarjeet Kaur, Wife of ‘ Shri Jora Singh, aged about 60 years, resident of through — Gurmit Singh, son of 'Jora Singh Kaur, aged about 29 years (Power of Attorney holder), resident of Indira Ward, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) 3’ The New India Insurance i, fk Co. Limited, GE. Road, Power House, Bhilai, Distt. Durg (C.G.) MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER SECTION I'fé OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, 1988 rt; lN THE HIGH COURT OF GHHATTISGARVH; qILASPU @ {LOK ADALAJ') ‘ MISCELLANEOUS AkEAL N¢.144312005 Appeuants: Mandari Bai and others Vel'SUS Respondents: Damaru Ram and others. (Arising qut of Claim Case No.65812004} 04M 112003 MandaKA, Bai with and othezs by Shri K.R. Nair.Adv. None for respondents No. 1 & 2. Shri K.L. Daswani, Divisional Manager, New India insurance Company Limited with Shri Deepak Gupta, counsel for respondent No. 3. Mandari Bai has filed an appiication along with an aflidavit for grant of permission to compromise the case on behalf of minor children Deleshwari, Deepa, Domar Singh and Radha Considered. Allowed. in terms of compromise, award is passed as below:— 1) ln addition to compensation already awarded by the Tribunai, respondent ‘ No. ‘3 shall pay Rs.1,01,000/— (Rupees one lakh one thousand) to the appellants. 2) For disbursement and deposit in FDR, the direction and ratio adopted by the Tribunal, if any, shall follow. 3) The amount, if any, kept in deposit with Bank shall be payable under the orders of Tribunal in accordance with law. 4) Appellants shall be entitled to receive interest on the amount so deposited, if any. 5) in view of the above, appeal against respondents No. 1 & 2 dands dismissed. 6) Out of the above amount, Rs.1,010/- (Rupees one thousand ten only) shall be paid to counsel for the appellant directly by the Insurance Company towards counsel fee. 7) Copy of the award shall be given to the parties free of cost. . sdl- i»\/’ V - _\‘ eta .. sJaf/Sa—[f Lv‘\\ I“ g r (Justice Vijay Kumar Sh‘dvastava) Membet L Lo’R’A/dalat High Court of Chhattisgerh High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur Bilaspur at padma ‘ ’ XV»{)R~ 15 , r 07 O3 2009 i i Mr D k MmJ; Advocate for fhe appellan’rs. Mr' AJay Mlshra Advocate for The respondem‘ No 3 Insurancé: Company Heard on :fhef avpplic‘a’rion ’for‘ rhodifikc’afiron/‘cbrrecfion V‘ of; Q 17V g r 3 ‘Typographical misiake Learned counsel for The appellanf as well as respondent No 31” Jom’rly submrr Thaf Inadverfenl‘ errors have crept In The award dafediir I 4112006 passed by we Lok Adam m Musc Appeal No1443/o5lrj- (Mandarl Ba! & o’rhers Vs Damaru Ram & ofhers) as 1n place of 'Clalm Case No 658/04' ‘Clalm Case No 17/02 has been Typed and Slmllarly, In place of.'Damaru Ram & others, ‘Ashok Kumar & others have been \, l pr described as respondents From perusal of the record we fund that there Is apparent typographlcal errors In the award dated 4 11 2006 as pointed out by learned counsel for the parties which needs correction Accordingly, the applucatlon Is allowed and the claim case number a as mentioned In the award dated 4 11 2006 passed In M A No 1443/05 Is corrected to be read as Claim Case No 658/04' m place of ‘Clatm i Case No 17/02' Slmllarly, descrlptnon of the respondents In the award ' ‘ dated 4 11 2006 be read as Damaru Ram & others In place of 'Ashok l mam» t , ,V §’ " a Kumar & others sal— l Sdl- Memhel u Lott . : .bhirendra Mishrm JK‘V/ . ’V I ' HIghCourtofGm l. d BILASPUR Judge