HIGH CGURT {)F (3HEA’K"§‘E§GARH AT BILASPUQ WRET PETITION _WR1T M PE’I‘I’I‘ION MWMWNWM UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIGNvm OF INDIA MN“ SH: Hen’hle Shri Satish k Aom’imtri. J. Present: Shri Manoj Pamnjpe, Advocate for the gmitioner. Responcient Shri Vim}; Harm N0. 1 Depmy to 3. Advocam Swami fer ths Wmta’ D1 Rohit Yaiiav, Caliector, Surguja, present in pefsma. " RAL ()RDER (Passed ‘ 011 11‘ day ‘ sf August, é 2008‘J Dr. Rohit Yadav‘ Culiector. Surgqja is presani in the Court. .He suhnits mat the order dated‘2’i.01.2(308 passed in Revenué Case N0. 80/A-2i/2801- 29024 was passed aiier having gonsiégred {he fact that the case was pendmg wnsideraimn for more than five years. He further submits mat he was under an impression that since the matier has hem heard earlier iay his predecessors, 110 mtice/in‘timation is required t0 be given t0 the yetitinner. Be that as it may, admittediy there was a. mis-‘unders‘iasdmg efthe m‘ecess. When fee matter was not iisted in the cause iist 9f the mattem 1istec! before / / 01’2008 PETH‘IONER Sardar Gurdeep Singh S/o Late Sizggh, Aged aboui 65’ 65’ yem‘S, R/o Ambikapur, Di$trict VERSUS Di$trict Surguja (CG) State of Chhattisgaxhg Rev-ewe Through: Ewamneiii, DKS. Raipur, Bism'ct 2. Cullector, Ambikapur, Raipur {Chhattisgarh) Surglg’a (CG) Sm‘guja, 3. Taisildar, Ambikapur, 4. Anancl Kumar Ambikapur, Kedia Districi Surgm’a Aged aboui 25 S/o Nagamla} yea“, R/o Banamg Ambikapur, Disntéet 5. Smt. Kiran Kedia, Smguja (CG) Aged about 35 W/o Rambiias .2- the Couri of Coilector, the marker should not have 13mm taken Without proper iniimaiion to the concerned pamies. Dr. Yadav further submits that he shoum be permittad 10 deeide i126 matter afresh, on its own merit, in accorciance with law, after intimaiing the pam'es. Amit in View of the statement made by the Coliecton Surguja? accoMing to ieamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this matter. Accordinglm the order dateti 21.G1.2008 stands quashed. The Coiiector. Surguja, is at Eiberty to pass appropriate order after attbrding an opportunity ofhearing to the parties concerned, in accordance with law. In. View of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of, No order asto costs. vi% i ' Sd/_ {I} Satish K. Agnihntri Judge