^Sa.sseSSS vv';Kfs^^^r^~~' 8ig9fiSS<B®''KEGHGGUR2': £ JO'B3EA'EH JS JABfiaPOR (M.P.) •P. H'o.LlH "l / /1999 pE.iECTI©IiIBB ;PE2'ITION URISR ART. 226/227 03' SHE SOISTIaXJIION OF IHBX& SudarshadLal Naik, so.no f Dev prasaa EIalfe, residenfr of village Jhanakpur, P.S. . BaraniKela, segsi.1 Sarangarh, I&strict satgarh, M.P. VEBSUS 1 Sfeafce of Madbs-a Pradesh, tbieugh fche Ctillecfcor, Bilaspur C?aB Parikshetra AdblkarL Sarangarh Van pari'kshetra (Sananya) 7aB mandal, Raigarh, M.p. , ' , 2 Sbri. MBrilailaI s/owicib San Sl.dai, . , . resi.dent of Baramk eL a, Sehsll araagarh, -Ct'sferl.ct Eaigarh, M.p. •,':.•' EE'I'&IIS OF PETOT330H ' . ' '.. !1 WGI y.ff-'^^SS: ,,rfi..a» ^^ VT^ I: , .y \' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0,4471 OF 1999 PETITIONER RESPQNDENTS Sudarshanlal Naik Versus State of Madhya Pradesh (Now Chhattisgarh) and another. Writ Petition under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India (Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Shri N.K.Aaarwal. J.) Present : Shri R.S. Patel, counselfor the petitioner. Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER , (Passed on 31st day of January, 2011) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by passage of time, the writ petition has become Infructuous. 2. tnview of above, ttie petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 3. Consequently, M(W)P. No. 858/2002, application for interim reliefalso standsdismissed. 1 SdA N.K.AgrawaI Judge M isa 'tll "^.