IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1236 of 2008 CHANDESHWARI SINGH @ CHANDESHWAR SINGH Versus RAMU SINGH & ORS ----------- 2 01.10.2008 Heard counsel for the defendant petitioner. In the opinion of this Court the impugned order passed by the lower appellate court refusing the prayer of the defendant appellant for producing a document of Panchayati by way of additional evidence under order-XLI Rule 27 C.P.C. does not suffer from any jurisdictional error inasmuch as in a suit for specific performance of contract the subsequent event of alleged Panchayati can not be a ground to resist the decree in favour of the plaintiff opposite party. That being so, this court would not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order and accordingly this Civil Revision application being wholly misconceived is hereby dismissed. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)