:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. APPEAL NO.352 OF 2005 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1132 OF 2003 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.396 OF 1998 IN CASE NO.A/36/96-97 Manju Krishana Murari Agrawal .. Appellant v/s. P.D.Agarwal & Sons & anr. .. Respondents Mr.R.M.Shah for the appellant. CORAM : R.M. LODHA AND J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 5th July, 2005 P.C. Heard Mr.R.M.Shah, the learned counsel for the appellant. 2. We perused the impugned order. The learned Chamber Judge found that the applicant (appellant herein) failed to establish her tenancy rights in the subject premises. The case set up by the applicant that she carries on the business in the subject premises in the name and style of Devesh Enterprises has not been believed. The learned counsel for the appellant could not show us any material that may justify the view different from that taken by the learned Chamber Judge. :2: 3. No case for interference is made out. Appeal is dismissed in limine. (R.M. (R.M. (R.M. LODHA, J.) LODHA, J.) LODHA, J.) (J.P. (J.P. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) DEVADHAR, J.) DEVADHAR, J.)