[iN'nE f. Q?&»ft laS.ii-i^—3i-i^l c [/ IN THE fflGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR igft^ VL-) . _,. VlO w^ W.P..^TNo.\8A"\ 38&9S.B. -J-, PETITIONER /)P?UCA»T ^° :^ i<A .•••'' ^y- ^ ^ \)^'\^^c> ;1^ d-: -' Smt. Najma Khatun W/o Mo. AIi Fhafuki age about 35years R/o Biajnath Para. Behind MadarshaTahsil and Dist. Raipur (C.G.) '-2-' MO-A)]' FhqP*; -s/o Ffe'ilt ft); Fh*"t;r VERSUS f^/o o.ke.Ve i^»'o»vdyrfifto^'M<'-L 1. TheState of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Chainnan, Revenue Board.Raipur (C.G.) 3. Jivan Lal S/p RamKhilawaa Barhwani,R/o Phafhadih, Tahsil and Distt Raipur (C.G.). 4. RatiKanto Maitri, S/o Shril Vijay Krishna Maitri,R/o Birgaon. Tahsil and Distt Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTILCLE 227 OF THE^-QNSTILTUTION OF INDIA FOMLSSUANCE OF AN APPROPRITE ORDER IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR MRECTION IN THE LI^fK NATUREi:TC ^'E--??o'Mt>t5~I^T 'hjg'NAPP1-!- rA'N jil?Els"i5a's'te. ,j5':!'^i; "Bgk^., !r y.^'V^-"^ ! ' \\ 1 ffth •^^. l^ll' J^^a=u'xiao3x^XAIxaaX£l '>!.. '||a-' '"!ai!lS»»'<<<a-^® HIGH COURT OF CHHATT'SGARH AT BSLASPUR ie Bench: Hgn'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra WntPetttion (227) No. 1234 OF 2010 PETtTiONERS RESPONOENTS \fersus Smt. Najma Ktiatun and another. The State of Chhattissarh and others. Shrs R.L. Agrav/at and Shri S.U. Qureshi, counsel for the petltioners. iri R.R. Sinha, Panei Lawyer for the Sfate/respondent No.1. Shri R.R ?RtT PETiTlON UNDER ARTICLE 227 QFJ'HE C(»ISTITUTSONOF (15.09.2010) ^ The Board of Revenue has dismissed the revision peBtion preferred by ths pstitioners chaiienging the order passed by the Additiona! Collector, Raipur on 08-08-2.0W. By the said order da^ Q8-08-20»ths Additiona! Coiiector, Raipur has set-aside ttie order passed by tte Sub CNvisiona! Off'cer, Raipur on 27-03-1988 and the report nf fte Officer on Specia! Duty made on 15-01-1988. (2) The issue pertains te demareation of !and. The Addttiona! Colteetor has found that demarcation of agricuitural land could not have been made by the Officsr on Speciai Duty, cliversion section, Raipur. (3) Admittediy a Civit Suit with respect to the suit land is pending betwsen ihe parties. The petitionere as f<e\\ as the respondente have appeared in Ihe su.it and are prosecuting fteir resDectivs cases. (4) in vtew of the pendency of Civil Suit, this Ccurt woutd not exercise its oxtraordinary, supervisory jurisdtcttQn under Artide 227 of the Constttufcn of indla with respect to an issue regarding demareation ofthe iand. (5! The writ oetitjon is dfemissect. _____-——-— Sd//- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge