1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5347 OF 2008 (Sau. Malti Rajesh Yawalkar & Anr. vs. Sagar Raghunathrao Kautkar & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DECEMBER 18, 2008. Heard Shri Dhatrak, learned counsel for the petitioners. The contention is that the procedure of conducting enquiry under Rule 7 of the Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Disqualification Rules, 1987, is not being followed inasmuch as the matter is fixed for final hearing directly without holding any preliminary enquiry. The perusal of impugned order does not support any such argument. It appears that after service of notice upon them, the present petitioners have moved an application under Rule 7(2) of the above Rules for dismissal of petition and those grounds are only looked into by Respondent No. 2 – Collector. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter at this stage. If any prejudice 2 is caused to the petitioners after final adjudication of the matter, the petitioners are free to challenge even the present impugned order dated 18.11.2008. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.