IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 20121 of 1999 Between: M/s Urvasi Bar & Resturant, Rep by its Smt.P.Bhavani, W/o Balaramkrishna, Paidaiah Street, Labbipet, Vijayawada ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of A.P., Rep by its Secretary, Labour Department, AP., Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 Authority u/s. 50 of AP Shops & Estt. Act 1988 and Labour Officer, Vijayawada, at VIJAYAWADA. 3 Chunduru Venkata Ramachandra Prasad, S/o Ch.L.Narasimharao, 24-15-58, 2nd Lane, Bavajipet, Vijayawada. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari by calling for the records relating to the proceedings in APSE Case No.95/95 on the file of the 2nd respondent herein, and declare the same as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional besides violative of principles of due procedure contemplated under the A.P.Shops & Establishment Act, 1988 and quash the same and pass such other order/s as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.Y.RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following : ORDER : This writ petition was filed in the year 1999, questioning the order passed by the Authority under Section 50 of the A.P. Shops and Establishments Act, 1988. By the aforesaid order, the Authority under A.P. Shops and Establishments Act has ordered the petitioner to pay an amount of Rs.27,954/- to the 3rd respondent herein. Though the said order is challenged in the writ petition, the writ petition was dismissed for default so far as 3rd respondent is concerned, by an order dated 10.09.2003 and no further steps have been taken in the matter. 2. Asmuch as the writ petition is dismissed for default as far as the 3rd respondent is concerned in whose favour the payment is ordered by the authority under the A.P. Shops and Establishments Act, no further relief can be granted in this writ petition, which is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 23rd January 2009. ajr