mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1722 of 1991 Narayan N. Sathe .. Petitioner versus Mukund D. Thakurdesai & ors. .. Respondents ... Mr.V.S. Gokhale for the petitioner. Mr.N.P. Deshpande for respondent no.1. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J DATED : 1st September 2008 P.C.: 1. Counsel for the respondent states that matter is amicably settled out of court between the parties. Learned counsel states that he has been instructed to state that the respondent has already vacated the suit premises. Counsel for the petitioner has no instructions in this behalf. There is no reason to doubt the correctness of the statement made by the advocate for the respondent. 2,. Petition is disposed off as having become infructuous in view of the development stated across the bar by the counsel for the respondent. However, petitioner will be free to get the matter revived in the event it is found that the submissions made by the respondent through counsel is incorrect. 3. Ordered accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)