IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.5010 of 2006 Date of Decision.03.10.2011 Kamal @ Bittu son of Sh. Madan Lal resident of 2289/1, Sector 45-C, Chandigarh and others .....Petitioners Versus Smt. Hyoti Chaudhary wife of Sh. Parvesh Kumar Chaudhary, resident of House No.2138, Sector 45, Chandigarh. .....Respondent Present: None. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. There is no representation for the petitioner. On an application being filed to take on record the proceedings of the Hon'ble Supreme court in SLP No.1804 of 2005 where the Hon'ble Supreme Court had allowed for proceedings to be continued but the order of eviction would not be passed or executed in the meanwhile, the Court had directed the petitioner to produce the copy of the order that came to be passed subsequently. This order has been passed by this Court on 30.10.2006 and till date, no steps have been taken to produce the copy of the order to inform the Court of the outcome of the disposal of the matter before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. 2. The civil revision petition is dismissed for non-compliance of the directions. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE October 03, 2011 Pankaj*