IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 19590 of 2010 Rinku & others .....Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. Sanjeev Pandit, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana, for the State. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondent No.2. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. Parties were directed to appear before the trial Court. They have not appeared. It is stated that the girl is now married to petitioner No.1 and couple is having a child also. Let the couple appear before the trial Court and get their statements recorded. The trial Court would act on the statements in accordance with law to deal with the criminal cases pending against them. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. November 11, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE