IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 8TH OCTOBER 2010 / 16TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 30999 of 2010(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- P.ABDUL RAZAK,S/O.PARAMBAN MOIDEEN, PARAMBAN HOUSE,VETTIKATTIRI AMSOM,PANDIKKAD.P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PERINTHALMANNA-679 322. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,MALAPPURAM-680 121. 3. THE ADDL.TAHSILDAR,ERNAD-680121. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER,VETTIKATTIRI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676 505. 5. THE STATE OF KERALA REP.BY THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 30999 OF 2010 (Y) ===================== Dated this the 8th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner challenges Ext.P6 proceedings issued under the Kerala Land Conservancy Act describing the petitioner as an unauthorised occupant of an unassessed Government puramboke land. 2. Having regard to the fact that the statute itself provides for appeal and revision as per Section 16, leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue his remedies, this writ petition is disposed of. 3. Petitioner also submits that in respect of the land in question, he has filed Ext.P4 application before the 1st respondent for assignment and that orders thereon have not been passed. If as stated, such an application has been made and is pending, it is for the authority to consider the same in accordance with law. This the 1st respondent shall do as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 8 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. However, it is clarified that the pendency of the application or its consideration will not stand in the way of implementation of Ext.P6. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp