^ C,^Lt -3T73 IN THE HON»BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION (S) No. L[\^f /2011 PETITIONERS ^^¥ RESPONDENTS: / 1. Ram I^umar Mishra S/o Baldau Prasad Mishra aged about 51 Years, presently working as Upper Division Teacher at Govt. Middle School Lavar, Block - Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) ^2. Ramchand Mishra S/o Jhumuk Lal Mishra aged about 53 Years, presently working as Upper Division Teacher at Govt. Middle School Devri Block Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) ^3. Antram Chandel S/o Balaram Chandel aged about 53 Years, presently working as. Head Master at Govt. Primary School Basantpur Block - Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Smt. Teresa Tirki S/o William Tirki aged about 54 Years, presently working as Head Master at Govt. Middle,. School Sukulkari Block - Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS /1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) The District Education Officer, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Block Masturi District / ^ 3. <Tt5(-^ Bilaspur (C.G.) ^-4. Joint Director, Treasury,accounts, pension, Bilaspur District-Bilaspur WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA B— ^s^s^^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISQARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON*BLE 8HRI JUSTICB PRITINKBR DIWAKBR W.P.lSi N0^4161/2011 PBTITIONERS Ram Kzimar Mishm & Others Versus RESPONDBNT8 State ofC.G. 8& Ofhers INDIA Apoearat&ce: Slzri Ashwiai Shukla, couxssel for the petitioners. N.Naha Roy, P.L. for the State. PRALQISDBR (01.08.2011) Wifh the consent offhe parties, the niatter is heaiid fiiiatly. The petitioners were mitiaUy appointed as Assistarit Teachers on a j5xed pay of Rs, 150. After corapletion of tlieir probation period, fhey were graated regular pay scale ofRs, 169-300. Leamed counsel for the petitioners subxaite fhat the above issue has been considered by the M.P, State Adimrdstrative Tribunal, Jabalpur m O-A^ N0. 274S/89 between SSadhulecmt Ycsdu <md 56 othera Vs» State o/BS.P. cind athers, wherein it was held fhat the siixiilarly situated teachers are entitled to regiilar pay scale wifh effect from the date of irdtial appomtment, The matter was taken up to the Hon^le Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Honyble Supreine Court upholding fhe decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistaxit Teachers az*e entifled to regular pay scale firom fhe date of imtial appointment, It is further subxaitted fhat this Court while cousidering the same issue m W.P^ (S) Ne. 472S/2006 between Amar Sed Keim. Ss Others Vs. Sfcrte of Chheittiagarh csnd C hers by order dated 01.09.06 aUowed fhe petitioners to make a representation withio a period often daySy raisiog all the grievaaces. ^^^^c.^^ i' fi^.' 1 I l Accordingly the petitioners are granted Uberty to make a representation radsiag all their grievaaces in the Mght offhe aforesaid judgment axid the circular dated 05.01.2011 (Annexure P/2)^ and ia tuni fhe concemed respondent is directed to decide fbe representation, if any, in accordance wifh laWy on its own merits, withixi a period of eight weeks froni the date of receipt of the representation subject to verification ofthe facts. In view of fhe foregoiag, fhis petition is disposed of No order as to costs. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge