,r? Il^ .v t I I I J ./' * IN THE HIGH COURT OF' DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2s6312011 & CM No.547512011 (for stay) ; RAI SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. C.B. Sewak, Adv. I Versus ; SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nav Ratan Chaudhary, Adv. for R-1. Ms. Anjana Gosain, Adv. i ' AND I + W.P.(C) s47I/2011 & CM No.11 176/2011 (for stay) RAKESH ..... Petitioner. Tlu'ough: Mr. C.B. Sewak, Adv. I Versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Anjana Gosain, Adv. i AND ' + W.P.(C) s47212011 & CM No.1 I 17712011 (for stay) s3t62t70$- JAI SINGH ..... Petitioner Ttu'ough: l\4r'. C.B. Sewak, Adv. : Versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondenis Tlu'ough: Ms. Nav Ratan Chaudhary, Adv. for R-l. Ms. Anjana Gosain, Adv. Signed By:RAM DATT Signing Date:09.09.2024 16:54 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified % 1. CORAM! : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW I ORDER 09.08.2011 The challenge in all these petitions is to the cancellation of the certificates eariier issued to the petitioners of belonging to the Scheduled Caste. It is the case of the petitioners that the cancellation Jas effected ; without issuing any notice to thern and without giving thern any hearing. i Notice of each of the petitions was issued and the public notices by which t cancellation was effected staved. 2. The counsel for the respondent has been heald. 3. I am satisfied that no opportunity of hearing was given to the : petitioners before effecting the cancellation. Accordingly, the pbtitions ale allowed and the public notices effecting the cancellation set aside, however t with a right to the respondents to, after giving opportunity to the'petitioners again cancel the certificates if the circumstances so warrant tiut with a speaking order. a, t-- 2/- g 4. The petitioners to appear before the SDM, Naya Bans, Narela at 1100 f hours on26tt' August, 2011 and on such subsecluent dates ut trruli be fixed i along with all their docurnents and representations. The SDM, NpYa Bans, Nalela to pass a reasoned order and to deliver a copy therebf to the I petitioners on or bifore 30tr'Septernber,20Ll. Needless to state that if the petitioners remain aggrieved, they shall have their rerredies in law.' 5. The petitions are disposed of No order as to costs. Dasti. RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J AUGUST O9,2OII 'gsr'.. u1 t3 {}: I i claf- ; I I I