1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3183/2009 Rajkumar @ Babu Mohan Varma PETITIONER Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA RESPONDENT Mr.Shyam Mehta for petitioner Mr.G.V.Patil,Jailor,Group II, Nasik Central Prison Ms.Kejariwal,APP for State CORAM:-SMT. RANJANA DESAI & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE : 7th JANUARY,2010 P.C. . The petitioner has preferred this application through Jail. The petitioner’s applications for parole have been rejected on the ground that the family members of the deceased have objected to his release on parole. The petitioner’s case is that his mother is sick. In the impugned order no doubt is expressed about the petitioner’s case that his mother is sick. We are informed by learned counsel for the petitioner that earlier the petitioner was released on furlough and he surrendered to the prison on time and no untoward incident had taken place. This is not disputed by learned A.P.P. . Learned A.P.P.on instructions from Mr.G.V.Patil , Jailor ,Group -II Nasik Central Prison who is present 2 in the Court ,submits that the petitioner had indeed returned to the jail on time when he was released on furlough and no untoward incident had taken place. In view of this , in our opinion the petitioner can be released on parole after imposing stringent conditions on him. Hence we pass the following order. O R D E R The Divisional Commissioner ,Nasik is directed to release the petitioner on parole for such a period as the Divisional Commissioner thinks fit and proper after imposing stringent conditions on him and only if he complies with the necessary requirements such as execution of surety bond, etc. , Needless to say after parole period gets over the petitioner should surrender to the prison. Petition is disposed of accordingly. Copy of this order be forwarded to the petitioner in jail. (SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.) (MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) 3