HIGHCQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ,B. : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. WRIT PETITIGN (S) No. 181?of 2007 ¥- :SPONDENTS : (l)Smt. Padma Arya W/o Shri Sheo Dutt Arya Aged 42 Years Assistant Teacfaer, Govt Middle School , Sorar, Gurur, District Durg (C.G.) (2)Smt. Khomin Sahu W/o Shri Puranlal Sahu Aged 35 years, Assistaat Teacher, Govt Primary School, Khundhani, Gumr, Dis^rict Durg (C.G.) (3)Chandrahas Sahu W/o Shri Shobha Ram Sahu Aged 40 years Assistant Teacher, Govt Primary School, Dan-a, Guror, District Durg (C.G.) (4)Kamta Prasad Todar S/o Shri Tatu Ram Todar Aged 35 Years Assistant Teacher, Govt Primary School, Dandesara, Giirur, District Durg (C.G.) (5)Smt. Naine Thakur W/o Shri Sadhu Ram Thakur Aged 41 Years Assistant Teacher, Govt Primary School, Bortara, Gurur, District ; (C.G.) (6)Champala! Morar W/o Laxmaa Morar W/b Shri Laxman Morar Aged 40 Years Head Master, Crovt Middle School Basin, Guror, District Diirg (C.G.) : (l)State Govt. of Through:- Secretary Tribal Welfare Department & Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) K):s (2)Assi§tant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department Durg (C.G.) (3)District Education Officer, Durg. (C.G.) Present: Shri Somkant Venna, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for the S1 (Passed on 28m ofMarch, 2007) 1. The question of law iavolved herein as to whefher the petitioners » are entitled to regular nav scale w.e.f the date of initial appointment or from the date ofcompletion ofprobation period. ^- 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in W.P.(S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh & Others). which was allowed vide orderdated7.11,2! 3. In view ofthe above-stated submissions made by leamed counsel for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Ajmt