IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 17042 of 2005 BETWEEN: Mohd Sibghatulla Yaseer presently studying 1st year BDS in SVS Institute of Dental, Sri Abdul Quadeer, R/o. Mahaboobnagar. ... PETITIONER AND 1 Vice Chancellor, NTR University of Health Sciences, Andhra Pradesh, Vijayawada. 2 The Registrar, NTR University of Health Sciences, Andhra Pradesh Vijayawada. 3 The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by its Prl. Secretary to Government Health, Medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 4 The Principal, SVS Institute of Dental Sciences, Appanapally Yedira PO, Mahaboobnagar. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order preferably in the nature of writ of Mandamus and declare the action of the 1st Respondent in not approving the admission of the petitioner in BDS course for the academic year 2004-05 issued vide impugned Memo No.1532/MBBS/BDS/EA1/2004 dt.29.6.2005 received by the College on 21 July 2005 as illegal, arbitrary and wholly without power or jurisdiction, violative of principles of natural justice and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the same in so far as the petitioner is concerned and consequently hold that the petitioner is entitled to complete his BDS Course and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to complete his BDS Course and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: DR.K.LAKSHMI NARASIMHA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FAMI.WELFARE The Court made the following: ORDER: The matter relates to the admission into BDS course for the academic year 2004-2005. As the academic year is already over and in view of the interim order granted by this Court, I am of the opinion that nothing survives in this writ petition for adjudication. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J July 15, 2008 DSK