IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 17425 of 2008 Between: Mallarapu Saraswathi, W/o. Late Ravindra Naidu, R/o. Guntur Village, G.K. Voor (Post), Bangarupalyam Mandal, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Chittoor District, Chittoor. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chittoor. 4 The Tahasildar, Bangarupalyam Mandal, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a direction/stay/order more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus and declare the action of the respondents in not entertaining the application of the Petitioner and in not conducting interview to the Petitioner for the sanction dealership for the permanent Fair Price Shop of Guntur Village of Bangarupalyam Mandal, Chittoor District as arbitrary, illegal and gross against tot the principles of natural justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.BANDI.VARAPRASADA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO :17425 of 2008 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies. The writ petition is filed on an apprehension that the 3rd respondent would grant the authorization for the fair price shop at Gunthur Village, Bangarupalyam Mandal, Chittoor District, to another person without considering the application of the petitioner, for grant of such authorization. This apprehension is speculative. No such authorization has been granted in favour of anybody, as is apparent from the pleadings in the writ petition. No case is made out for grant of preemptive relief. The writ petition is dismissed as premature. As and when the authorization is granted in favour of any person and the petitioner perceives a cause of action, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the Court. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J DATE: 11th August, 2008 pnb