1 z IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR -^jz W.F.( S)No.....:/..'.7/.1........../2011 PETITIONER: ^••A^-^-"....--' ,^';.--' ...•••"~ >»¥''•" ...••</1,< "• ..•*" ^^^. ?^- ..-•-""^ ^60" RESPONDENTS: Rajesh Paul Masih S/o Late S. Ram Masih, Aged about 39 Years, R/o Anugrah, Behund Chitalia Rice Mill, Kondagaon, Bastar VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Director, Health Services, Directorate, Health Service, Old Nursing Hostel, Opposite Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Collector South Bastar Dantewada (C.G.) 3. Additional Collector South Bastar Dantewada (C.G.) , 4. Chief Medical and Health Officer Dista-ict South Bastar, Dantewada (C-G-) -i. PETITION UNDER ARTIGLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA_FOR ISSUANCE OF APFROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS:- SB : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICB PRITINKER DIWAKER <3ff a vei'sus Raiesh Paul MasiJi State. of Chhattisgarh & Others Shri Varun Shanna, counsel for the peti.uoner. Shri Yashwant Siagh Thakur, Dy. AG. for the State. WRIT PETITION USDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION (30.11.20111 Grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is ffaat on 1.6.2011, he was suspended by respondent N0.1 however, after a lapse of45 days, fhe suspension order offhe petitioner got revoked. Couiisel for the petitioner subraits taat after revoca.tion of bis suspension order, the petitioner has joined on 5.8.2011 aiid M performiiig his duties regularly but tUl date Se has aot been paid Iiis salary. He furfher subniits that the petitiouer has inade seyeral representations to the respondents iacluding respondent No.4 who has to pass tlie order, but tiil date none of his representation has been considered by fhe conipetent aufhority. State counsel sub-mits that let fhe oetitioner tnake a fresh representation to fhe respondent No.4 aSsr supplyiag copy of the saiae to respondent N0.2 and in tuni his representation would be decided in accordance with law subject to his eUgibiliw for gcttiiig his salary. The preseat petition is disposed of with a direction to fhe petitiouer to inake a representation to fhe respondent N0.4 after supplyiag copy of fhe sam.e to respondent N0.2 wittun. troo weeks aad it is expected froia the authodty concemed to decide bis representation withiu a period of one inonfh th.ereafter. -tr^ It is inade clear that fhis court has not exoressed anv opiaion on fhe nierits of the case and tbe aufhoritv concemed would be at. liberty to decide fhe representation stricfly ia. accori.aiice wifh law. Sd/- Pridiiker Diwaker