IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.1814 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : 15.11.2011 Dharam Pal ... Appellant versus State of Haryana & others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA Present : Mr. R.K.Handa, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. R.K.S.Brar, Addl. AG, Haryana. **** Permod Kohli, J.(Oral) Learned State counsel has pointed out that the impugned order dated 31.05.2010 (Annexure P-8) passed consequent upon implementation of an order dated 27.05.2010 passed by the Inspector General of Police, is not under challenge. From the perusal of the pleadings of the parties, we find that neither the appellant has challenged the order dated 27.05.2010 nor the State has taken any plea in this regard. However, from the perusal of the record we find that the basic order of enhancement of penalty against the appellant is dated 27.05.2010, which is not under challenge. In view of this fact, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file fresh one challenging the order dated 27.05.2010 as well. Prayer allowed. Learned State counsel will furnish a xerox copy of the order dated 27.05.2010 to the learned counsel for the appellant during the course of the day. LPA No.1814 of 2011 -2- In view of withdrawal of writ petition, this appeal is rendered infructuous. (Permod Kohli) Judge November 15, 2011 (Tejinder Singh Dhindsa) sonia Judge