IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10188 of 2008 PRAKASH CHANDRA MISHRA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3. 12.01.2009 Heard leaned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. Learned Counsel for the State does not dispute the correctness of the submission made on behalf of the petitioner that the claim of the present petitioner is covered by the judgement and order of this Court in CWJC No. 9700 of 2008 disposed on 9.1.2009 inasmuch as the petitioner also claims tobe recognized by the three men committee constituted under the orders of this Court when he has been deprived of the benefits of the three men committee and was reverted top the stage of daily wager without any notice or show cause to him. The impugned order dated 24.3.2008 and the consequential order dated 12.6.2008 are accordingly set aside for the very reasons discussed in the aforesaid writ application and the present writ application is disposed in similar terms. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)