- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION ARBITRATION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.507 OF 2001 PETITION NO.507 OF 2001 PETITION NO.507 OF 2001 Hitechi Jewellery Industries Ltd. and anr. ... Petitioners v/s Tata Finance Ltd. ... Respondents Mr S.S. Purohit with Mr Amit Sheth for Petitioners. Mrs Shakuntala Joshi for Respondents. CORAM : D.K.DESHMUKH J. DATE : 1ST SEPTEMBER 2004 - 2 - P.C. :- 1. There is a provisional Liquidator appointed on the petitioner No.1 Company. Therefore, according to the learned counsel for respondents, the present petition is infructuous. I have heard both the sides. The defence is that the agreement was not signed on behalf of the petitioner No.1 and that the signatures were given on blank papers. This contention has been disbelieved by the learned Arbitrator and he has recorded finding after giving good reasons. After having gone through the record, I do not find any reason to interfere with the award. Petition is disposed off. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate / Personal Secretary as true copy. . Certified copy expedited. -----------------