1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.283 OF 2010 The Regional Director,ESIC, Mumbai...Appellant. Vs. M/s. Neo Shine Varnishes. ..Respondent. Mr.H.V.Mehta for the Appellant. Mr. Rajesh Gehani for the Respondent. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 4th March, 2010 PC : 1 This is a first appeal filed by the appellant impugning a judgment and order dated 20.12.2008 passed by the Employees State Insurance Court at Mumbai. On reading the judgment, I find that only dispute is as to whether two workemn who were found working in the factory on the date of the visit were employees of the respondent company. These two persons were a mason and a carpenter who were supplied by another company by name M/s. V.G. Enterprises. The respondent company is engaged in manufacturing varnishes. The trial court has held that these persons were not connected with the 2 work of the respondent company. It is not disputed that if these two persons are excluded then the respondent company does not have 10 workmen as required for the respondent to be covered under ESIC Act. In this background, I find that there is no substantial question of law as required. Hence, first appeal is summarily rejected. ( R.S. MOHITE, J.)