IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH MAY 2010 / 5TH JYAISHTA 1932 WP(C).No. 16091 of 2010(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- LAKSHMANAN A., LINEMAN GRADE-II, K.S.E.B., ELECTRICAL SECTION, CHERPULASSERY, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. DR.K.P.SATHEESAN SRI.K.K.GOPINATHAN NAIR SRI.M.R.JAYAPRASAD SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM) SRI.MATHEW SUNNY SRI.ANOOP.V.NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD (K.S.E.B. IN SHORT), REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (H.R.M.), K.S.E.B., VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL DIVISION, K.S.E.B., PALAKKAD. BY GP SRI.ARAVINDKUMAR BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ------------------- W.P.(C)16091/2010 -------------------- Dated this the 26th day of May, 2010 JUDGMENT Petitioner is a Lineman Grade-II under the respondents. By Ext.P9 order, he was imposed the punishment of warning with a further direction that the period of suspension and dismissal will be treated as leave without allowance and it will not be counted for any service benefits. Aggrieved by that part of the order, he has filed Ext.P11 appeal before the 2nd respondent. In this writ petition although the petitioner has raised several contentions against Ext.P9 order itself, having regard to the pendency of the appeal pending before the 2nd respondent, I do not think it is necessary that this Court should enter into the disputed issues. Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P11. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with the copy of the writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs