IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 966 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 966 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 966 OF 2006 Pankaj S. Choudhari. ] .. Petitioner Versus 1. The Charity Commissioner of Mumbai ] and 2 ors. ] .. Respondents Mr. J.K. Mistry with Mr. M. Londey i/b Sanjay Udeshi for the petitioner. Mr. L.T. Satelkar, AGP, for the respondents No.1 and 2. Ms. Kanchan Pamnani for the respondent No.3. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 03RD MAY, 2006 P.C. : . Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and in view of the controversy, we propose to dispose of the Petition by issuing following directions. (i) On behalf of the respondents No.1 and 2, learned counsel makes a statement that while making selection, no discrimination : 2 : has been practiced. (ii) Considering petitioner is on the waiting list, learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2 makes a statement that he will be kept on the wait list and as soon as vacancy arises, he will be issued a letter of appointment. 3. Statements accepted. 4. Petition disposed of accordingly. Sd/- [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] Sd/- [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]