IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 17TH DECEMBER 2010 / 26TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 RP.No. 1115 of 2010(J) ---------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.34299/2010 DATED 23/11/2010 .................... PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- SARANKUMAR, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O.LATE P.GOVINDA PANICKAR, 'SAROJAM', DESIYA KAVALA ROAD, THRIKKAKARA P.O., VAZHAKALA. BY ADV. SRI.V.S.CHANDRASEKHARAN, SMT.LEKSHMI SWAMINATHAN. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. SECRETARY, GRATER COCHIN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, COCHIN-682 020. 2. THE CHAIRMAN, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, GREATER COCHIN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, COCHIN-682 020. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.M.K.THANKAPPAN, SC, GCDA THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/12/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: rs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- R.P No.1115 of 2010 in W.P (C) No.34299 of 2010 -------------------------- Dated this the 17th December, 2010 O R D E R The writ petition was dismissed by judgment dated 23rd November 2010. One of the reasons stated in the judgment was that after 2004 petitioner has not made any payment to the GCDA. 2. In this review petition, producing Annexure A1 and pointing out that in pursuance to the said order, ` 2 lakhs has been paid, petitioner is seeking a review of the judgment. 3. Learned standing appearing for the respondents confirms that ` 2 lakhs has been paid by the petitioner on 1.11.2004. 4. Now that such a submission has been made by the learned counsel for the respondents, the aforesaid finding in the judgment is factually incorrect. Therefore, review petition stands allowed and judgment is recalled. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE ma /True copy/ P.A to Judge 2 ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE ma