IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. 31113 of 2009 Date of decision:- 11.1.2010 Amit Bagga @ Minkle petitioner vs State of Punjab Respondent Present: Mr. JBS Gill, Advocate. Mr.Arshvinder Singh, DAG, Pb M.M.S.BEDI,J. The petitioner seeks the concession of bail pending trial in a case, registered at the instance of Rohit Palaha alleging that on 25.6.2009 at 9 PM, his brother Rocky was inflicted injuries by Star, Vicky and Bunny, who were accompanied by one unidentified person. Learned State counsel has opposed the petition on the ground that the petitioner has been attributed an injury with a kirpan on the neck of Rocky, brother of the complainant. He has further contended that in view of the nature of the injury on the neck, it is a clear case of intention to murder, as such the petitioner should not be granted the concession of bail. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record of the case. The petitioner is not named in the FIR by the complainant but he has been named by the injured to have inflicted injuries on his person. A dual version has already cropped in; injured has already been discharged from the hospital; the petitioner has been in custody since 17.9.2009; challan has already been presented. Without expression of any opinion on merits of the case, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail to the satisfaction of CJM, Hoshiarpur. January 11 ,2009 (M.M.S.BEDI) TSM JUDGE