gopi 1 pil-85-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.85 OF 2010 Mr. Siddharth Chhabu Khandagale & Ors...Petitioners V/s. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. .... Respondents. Mr. Rakesh Agarwal for the petitioners. Mr. K.K. Singhvi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Geeta Joglekar for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. D.A. Nalawade, Government Pleader for respondent Nos. 3 and 4. Mr. S.U. Kamdar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Chirag Balsara and B.Maneck i/b. Wadia Ghandy & Co., for respondent No.5. CORAM: MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J., AND MRS.ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATED : 23 September 2011. P.C. On 28 June 2011 this Court had noticed that respondent No.5 was called upon by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai to rectify certain defects. Hence the Hydraulic Engineer of the Corporation was directed to make site inspection and submit his report about all the objections raised in the notice issued by the Corporation on 25 April 2011. The Hydraulic Engineer accordingly inspected the site and submitted his report dated 16 August 2011. The report of the Assistant Engineer (Water Works), G-South Ward dated 16 August 2011 notes that the suggestion made by the Hydraulic Engineer to inspect the internal gopi 2 pil-85-10 watermain 150 mm dia has been encased all around with cement concrete for complete portion between B to B1 has been carried out. This would constitute sufficient compliance of the provisions relating to the protection of watermains under the circumstances in which the construction of the building is made. 2. In view of the above report, nothing further survives in this petition. Petition is accordingly disposed of. (CHIEF JUSTICE) (ROSHAN DALVI, J.)