IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.942 of 2010 IN (CWJC 969/2008) ====================================================== Ramashray Singh S/O Late Ram Vidya Singh R/O Vill.- Gauradih, P.O.- Bhakura, Via-Karath, P.S.- Terari, Distt.- Bhojpur (Arrah) .... .... Appellant. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through Secretary, Education Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 2. The Accountant General (A&E) Ii Birchand Patel Marg, Patna 3. The Treasury Officer Rohtas (Sasaram) 4. The District Education Officer Rohtas (Sasaram) 5. The District Education Superintendent Rohtas (Sasaram) 6. The District G.P.F. Officer District Office, Rohtas (Sasaram) .... .... Respondent ====================================================== 2. 23.06.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner very humbly prayed that the claim raised by the petitioner in para-6 of the writ petition has not been replied by the respondent. Only general statement of fact has been stated in the counter affidavit that the entire amount of GPF has been paid. We cannot determine the claimed amount without the facts from both the sides. Therefore the petitioner is relegated to make a representation to the Principal Accountant General, Patna who shall examine the matter and pass a judicious order within two months. Appeal is disposed of. PN (Prakash Chandra Verma, J.) (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)