IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 14TH OCTOBER 2008 / 22ND ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 30030 of 2008(Y) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- R.M.NIZZAR, THURUTHEL HOUSE, PLOT NO.76, MAVELIPURAM, KAKKANADU P.O., KOCHI-682 030. BY ADV. SRI.C.A.MAJEED RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THRIKKAKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KAKKANADU. 2. THE SECRETARY (SPECIAL GRADE) THRIKKAKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KAKKANADU, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. MR.E.G.MANOJ, SRUTHILAYAM, KESARI ROAD, N.PARUR-683 513, NOW RESIDING AT PLOT NO.35, I FLOOR, GOKULAM, MAVELIPURAM, KAKKANADU P.O., KOCHI-682 032. BY SRI. S. SHANAVAS KHAN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J ================== W.P(C)No.30030 of 2008 ================== Dated this the 14th day of October, 2008. J U D G M E N T The petitioner has filed this writ petition alleging that the 3rd respondent is making construction in violation of the Kerala Municipal Building Rules, which is applicable to the construction being made by the 3rd respondent. Ventilating his grievance, the petitioner has filed Exts.P5 and P6 representations before the respondents 1 and 2. For the present petitioner would be satisfied with a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to consider and pass orders on Exts.P5 and P6 expeditiously. 2. I have heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 also. In the nature of the order, I propose to pass, I do not think it necessary to issue notice to the 3rd respondent at this juncture. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the competent among respondents 1 and 2 to pass orders on Exts.P5 and P6, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, W.P(C)No.30030 of 2008 - 2 - within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as the 3rd respondent. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE rhs