1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6469 OF 2009 Nageshwar Rajaram Kharade & Ors. .. Petitioners versus Roha Nagar Parishad & Ors .. Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.6470 OF 2009 Jayantilal Achaldas Jain & Ors. .. Petitioners versus Roha Nagar Parishad & Ors. .. Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.6471 OF 2009 Abbas Hussain Sawal .. Petitioners versus Roha Nagar Parishad & Ors. .. Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.6472 OF 2009 Ujjwal Anant Karekar .. Petitioners versus Roha Nagar Parishad & Ors. .. Respondents Mrs.Badadare i/by Mr.Ganesh Gole for the petitioner/petitioners in all the petitions. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 29th August 2009. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. By the impugned orders, the applications made by the petitioners for amendment of the plaint have been rejected. The rejection is on the 2 ground that the applications for amendment were filed nearly 20 months after affidavit in lieu of examination-in-chief was filed. 2. Considering the stage at which applications for amendment were filed and considering the nature of relief sought in the plaint, this is not a case where interference can be made at this stage by invoking jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners can always challenge the impugned orders in appeals which may be preferred by them against the decrees passed in the suit if the same be adverse to the petitioners. Subject to what is observed above, writ petitions are rejected by keeping all contentions open. (A.S.OKA,J)