IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P.(T) No. 4591 of 2008. Decided on: 4th August, 2010. _____________________________________________________ Meera Chauhan. …Petitioner. -Versus- The State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. T.C. Sharma, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 to 3. : Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant A.G. Respondents No. 4 to 7, already ex-parte. None for respondents No. 8 and 9. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge: Petitioner has made a representation for the redressal of her grievance vide Annexure P-8 on 6th July, 1995. He has primarily relied upon Annexure P-VII seeking absorption. However, the representation of the petitioner has not been decided till date. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the Chief Secretary, Government of Himachal Pradesh to consider and decide the representation made by the petitioner on 6th July, 1995 (Annexure P-VIII) in view of the law laid down by their lordships of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Municipal 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.No. Corporation of Delhi Versus Female Workers (Muster Roll) and another, AIR 2000 Supreme Court 1274 by passing a speaking order, within a period of ten weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment. No costs. Copy dasti, on usual terms. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge August 04, 2010. (bhupender)