BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAR ATBILASPUR W.P.NO. t^^ /2003. PETITIQNBRS 1. Thakur Ram Sahu, aged about 40 years, son of Shri M.R. Sahu, personal Assistant P.C.C.F., Raipur, Department of Forest, resident of Anand Vihar Tatibandh, Raipur (C.G.) Chandra Shekhar Medhekar, aged about 40 years, son of Shri Vasudev Rao, Personal Assistant P.C.C.F., Raipur, Department of Forest, resident of Sai Sadan, Dubey Colony, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). Mohan Lal Sahu, aged about 41 years, son of Shri P.R. Sahu, Personal Assistant, P.C.C.F. Raipur, Department of Forest, resident of Nandi Chowk, Tikra-para, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS .,/'^XJ^ !.. .2^ ^ '; ,'^y'^vr^%^ i ' t^^?"rl 1. , State of Chhattisgarh, through : The Secretary, department of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Secretariat, Raipur, (C.G.) •:^...:. :\ '• @ 2. Principal' /" Chief Conservator of Forest Office of the P.C.C.F., Jail Road, Raipur (C.G.). 3. Additional PrinGipal / Chief Conservator (Administration / Co-ordinater - Gazetted) Office of the P.C.C.F., Jail Road, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). 4. Chief Conservator of Forest (Non-Gazetted) Aranya Bhawan, Raipur (Chhatti^garh). ^' PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^^" THE XI-HC-22 ^n^i^r 'f^ri^3:?T|^T :^iN7^ft?r ,/ ?^r ^ii^id^, ^ni^^Ko, fa<ni<-ili< ^^:^m!.^ ^ •^^T' wwn^<T '3???^T ^^T^ ^f^ ^114?<vl41-l ^Hdf'^fe^i^^K '^T3?f^THW5t1?T 1S.07.2003 Snit. Fouzia Mirza, couusel Sliri Saiijay S. Agrawal, P.L Heard. the State Counsel, the matter Though tliis inatteris liste.d| question nivolved aiid 011 tlie pr^ petitioiier aiicl with the consent o^ is taken up for final disposal, The grievance of the petit|.oners is t-o tlie order dated 6,5.2003 whereby tliev have be^ Pcrsonal i^ssistaut to Stciiographc( Thc casc of thc pctition^ r21.8.2002 the petitiQners; who | Stenographers were promLOted to tJ aiid staitecl clischai'gitig tlieu' du( lapse ofabout a year, vide order reverted. The order is a^^ailed int| could not have been reverted witli< ofhearing. It is also alleged that br tlie petitioners. for the State. Ebr admission, considei-uig the ,rer of leained counsel for the n reverted from tlie post of r^ i^ that vidc ordex' dated d^ited were holdiiig tlie post of |ie post of Personal Assistaiits ties as siich. Ho^vever, after 6.5.2003, they have been :^r alia 011 tlie ground tha.t they tiit givitig them. aii opportuuity |liough a representation, copy ['Tft^ ^fty^ XI-HC-22 ^?T^l'^T 1<^i4) 3Tri?r ^RN? ^if^r ^^ ^WW^, ^TlS^^Ko, f®l<rtl^^< 3TR[^r 'sRra? Hl^<<11 ^^^—-—-'——-—^^ ^^ 'I^ST' @ '3iT^T ^^TW^ft^ — -^' <^i^<n<flti 'WTo'ff ^ "fe^ i^'^K ^ ^?f;OT3?n^i whereof is Aniiexure P/3, has 1: taken. Aecordingly, alteniative concemed respondent to co^ rcpresentatioiT of the petitioners' Acceptoig the prayer, tlie dii'ectiiig respoiident No. 1 to petitioners within. a period of| commmiication/receipt of this o^ respect to petitioners3 postmg as Conseqiiently, M.W.P.No.l| i.A.No.5091/2003 for m-gcnt (een tlled, 110 actiou has been ^rsyer is for a directioii to the i^sider aad dispose of tlie >n ments, t¥rit petitioii is disposecl of by co4sider tlie reprcsentation of tlie six weeks froin the date of }rler. TU1 then, status quo with bxistiiig today be lo.aiutaiiied, 549/2003 for mterim reMefaiid also staiid disposccl of. lica|iiiig Sd/- P.C. Naik Judge [^1^ ^Pa^