IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 27TH MARCH 2009 / 6TH CHAITHRA 1931 RP.No. 343 of 2009(Y) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.28980/2008 DATED 09/12/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER ------------------------------------------------- M/S.ETTUMANOOR VYAPARA BHAVAN TRUST, VYAPARAMBHAVAN,THEMPLE ROAD, ETTUMANOOR, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, M.P.JAYAKUMAR. BY ADV. MR.RENJITH B.MARAR MR.L.RAJESH NARAYAN IYER SMT.LAKSHMI.N.KAIMAL SMT.P.A.PRIYA RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS --------------------------------------------- 1. STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, KOTTAYAM MAIN BRANCH, THIRUNAKKARA SOUTH PO.KOTTAYAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER. 2. AUTHORISED OFFICER, STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, KOTTAYAM MAIN BRANCH, THIRUNAKKARA SOUTH P.O. KOTTAYAM. 3. DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, REGIONAL OFFICE, KOTTAYAM. R1 TO R3 BY ADV. MR.R.S.KALKURA THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/03/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Rs/ THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.P.343/2009 in W.P.(C).28980/2008-Y = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 27th day of March, 2009. O R D E R This is an application for review of judgment. I fail to understand how such a review petition would lie at all. The judgment sought to be reviewed is one issued merely recording the submissions in court through counsel and by stating that the writ petition is closed without considering anything on merits. This, evidently, means that there is no adjudication followed by any order on merits. There is no error apparent on the face of record. Annexure-A, which is now placed on record, was not before the Court when the judgment was issued on 9.12.2008. Whatever be the terms of that judgment, they really do not bind the parties on either side or tie down them to any particular term since this Court only closed the writ petition otherwise than on merits. The review petition hence fails. The same is accordingly dismissed. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/270309