HIeH COURT OF CHHAmssARH AT aILASPUR WP. (227) No. 3993 of 2008 PeTi'rioners Defendants 1. 2. 3. Respandanfs Phinfiffs Versus 1. 2. Jagdish Barman, Aged abou'r 40 years. Eourvnng Barman, Aged abau‘t 32 year's. Madho Barman, Aged abauf 36 years. Suraj§ni Barman Agad abouf 3O yzars. .Sarojani Barman, Aged abou-I' 3O years. Na. 1 fa 5 & AH Sla but: Sachindm Barman. Ashala-I‘a Barman, Agad abou'f 60 years, Wd/o Sach‘indm Barman, No. 1 ‘ra 4 and 6 are All Resident of Mona Colony &. Nb. 5 of Residen‘f of ViHage Pipreud, Tahsil dvDistricf Rnipur (6.6.) Fmm 1, 2 and 5 1'0 6 'Hwough Pawar of A??omey Ho!der Madho Barman, 5/0 Sachin Barman, Rio Mann Colany, Ruipur (CE) Aradham Barman, Aged abw'r 38 year-s, Samolu Barman, Aged abouf 55 years. . Nirmah’ krmnn, Aged abouf 45 years, Ashfami garman, Aged abouf 42 yearrs. Vimala Bur-man, Aged abaui‘ 32 years. Sushila Barman, Aged abou‘f 28 years. Na. 1 to 6 D/o a“ ln‘fe .Sachoni Barman. Krishna Barman, D/o Lafe Norendm Barman, Aged about 48 years. Rohidas Barman, 5/0 LaTe Narendm Barman, Aged ahou‘i' 39 years, No. i 1’0 & are. residents of Marla Tahsi! A, District Raipur (CG) 5mm of Chha'rfisgarh : Through : Collecfor, Raipur (6.6.) WRIT PETITOIN U BER ARTICE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION Singla Saneh : Hon'ble Mr. swish K. Ayniho'fri, J. \‘\\ ORAL ORDER (Passed on wig 25’“ day 9f my, 2008) The pz't'i'rioners, by ‘H'u's pafifion, impugn 'H12 ordzr drrrzd 22.42008 (Annexwa P/i), passad by +912 Firsf Addifiana! Disfrid Judge, Rnipur in Misceiianeous Civil Appen! Na. 04/2007. The brief fucks, in nu'l’sheil, are 'l’haf fhe plain+iffslmSpandenfs havz filed fhe CM! SIJH' Na. 133-A/2007, which is pending win! in ‘Hae haurf 6f Sevenfh Civii Judge, Class-II, Ruipur. During 'the pendency of ‘H'Ie civii Sui-r, 'H'ae piain+iffs filed an applicnfion under Order 39 Ruies 1 and 2, rend with .Sec‘rion 151 of ‘Hie Code af Civil Procedure for grarrr of iempomry injunc‘rinn 1’0 fhe ek'tenf ‘i'hnf we defer-dams may he resfmined from 'rmnsferring fhe sui‘t lend, The? applicaiian was uiiowed by ‘H'ue +riel Cam“!- vide order dafed 24.9.2007. Ageing)» me order dam: 24.9.2007 we magmas! deferidan'is filed Miscelianeous Civil Appeal No. 04/2007, which was dismissed Vida impugrled order doll-ed 22.4.2008, passed by ‘Hne Firs‘f Additional Distric'l' Judge, Raipur. Leemed counsel appearing for ‘H'Ie pefi'l’ianers $5bmi1's ‘l'lm‘i neither fhe ploin‘l'iffs liave any righi- over ‘l'he sui'l’ 'bnd’nor fhey are in possession fhereof, as such, fhe balance of convenience does no'r \vesis in favour of 14w. plaimiffs. The gm flied by we plasmm is \\ Sim C. R. Sahu, Advocaie for The petitioner-s. E'av'r. Advocate Sin-i Vina-y for Harif, 'rhe respondent Depuiy Advoca-le No. 9. general wiih Shri Alok Bakshi, 30 *ime barred and hey have alga no? prayw for graM 0f passessian. Thus, lmmad Cwr'rs beiaw have cammi'rfed error in granfing inju7ic+ion in favour af The phini’iffs. Learned appzlkrrz Courf has considered all 1412 mas of fha ma‘H’er and has held +ha1' if "rhe sui‘r iand is transferred by ‘ihe defendams/pei‘i‘rioners and mird party in-reres'r is creafed, #hen ‘H'uere may be chances 0f mui‘i'ipiici‘fy 9f ii‘l‘iga'l’ian and 'i'he piainfiffs/responden-rs may suffer irreparable iass. On perusal af fhe impugned order passed by +he Court belaw, if is eviden-l- 'Hm‘t 'me graunds raised herein have been cansidered in +erms and +here is no illegality; irreguiariiy or perversity in 'the order passed by die Caur'r below, As 'H'ie civii surf is pending friai, 'ihe prayer of fhe ploin'fiffs 1'o res‘i'roin fhe defendan‘i's fram fransferring fhe sui'i iand during +hependency of 1he civii suit is justified. I‘i is weii-nigh esiabiished fhai fhis Cour? in exercise of ifs supervisory jurisdicfion under Ar‘i’icie 227 of #he Cans'i'ifu‘fian of Endia should refrain ifseif from ini'erferihg wi'i'h 'l’he order passed by +he Couru beiaw, excep‘l- in suah: cases where perversity, ; iiiegaii‘ry, irregularity or jurisdici'ionai error is wrif iarge on fhe face of fine record, which is no‘i in +he presen-I- case. In View of 1he foregoing, 'I’here is no meri‘i' in fi‘iis pe‘iiiion and ‘H‘ie same is dismissed Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Sd/— Thakur i