6 ..^<T^ o' Sjngi? Sench IN THE HIGH COURT OF JITOICM'UKE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W. P.No .4-75-C>/2004 PETITIONERS w Mirza Irfan Ahmed aged about 23 years S/0 Shri M.S. Ahmed R/0 Masjid Road, Kota District Raipur (C.G.) PraKash Kumar Chandrakar aged about 24 years S/0 Sfiri G.R. Chandrak.ar R/0 House No. 15/581 Badhai Para, District Raipur (C.G.) Amit Thakur aged about 23 years S/0 Shri R.K. Thakur R/0 Kela Badi near Sahu •Sadan District Durg (C.G.) Navin Me shram aged about 24 years • S/0 Shri R/0 Ambedkar Nagar, near; Civil Line' Thana, Bilaspur .(C.G.) . ,:.•:. Girish Chandra Kusbwaha. aged about 23 years S/0 S.hri G.R. Kushwaha - R/0 Gokulpur, Dhamtari District Raipur '^C.G.) : > Ku. Manju Bhar'ati ' aged about 20 years D/0 SHri Brijmohan Ram R/0 Balaji Nagar, Gudiyari Nagar, Shrinagar District Raipur (C.G.) "1. '" Ku. Kusum Nag " Aged about 20 years D/0 Shri N.L. Nag R/0 Vili;. & P.0. Dhanora Tahsil Keskal ^ District Bastar (C.G.), Kishor Kumar ' ' Aged about 28 years S/o Shri Sitaram R/0 ViIl.S Post Soorsitapyr Disfrict Sarguja (C.G.) 9. Ku. Mamta Bhagat Aged about 20 years D/0 Shri S.S. Bhagat R/0 Vill. &-Post Sahashpur District Jashpur (C.G.) y^ 10 Arvind Singh Sikharwar Aged about 21 years S/0 Shri R.K. Sikharwar^ R/0 Room No. 50 . College of Agriculture New Hostel, Raipur District -Raipur (C.G.) 11. Kamle'sh Kumar Mourya Aged about 22 years S/o R.S. Mourya - • 1> :„» R/0 R/0 Room No. 73 College of Agriculture New Hostel, Raipur District Raipur (C.'G.) ^12. Rishikesh Kashyap . Aged about 26 years S/o Shri G.K. Kashyap R/o Jamig 6 Bodhghat Colony, Jagdalpur District Jagdalpur (C.G Amit Kumar Tanwar Aged about 20 years S/0 Shri C.P.S. Tanwar R/0 Rajni Sahu B'hawan Lodhi Para, Sarkanda District Bilaspur (C.G.; VERSUS RESPONDENTS: -u"—:-^ •^—-^ 1:*^^* ..K r'-i~''"tTT':'. ^'g':T-.' ^t^." "/^. •':••''. 's^ --" . ^' V ">c;^r^^' "'%».^ ^^y'^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Department of Agriculfure D.K.S. Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya . through the Registrar • Krishak Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) ^ - . -Vice Chancelior Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya Krishak Nagar, Raipur (C.&.) 'i. • ^< Dean i; I, Shaheed Gundadhur Colle< <. (.' • •. .•. ;. of Agriculture Jagdatpur (C.G.) Dean Danteshwari College of Horticulture, Raipur (C.G.) Dean Thakur Chhedilal Barrister, College of Agriculture Bilaspur (C.GJ Dean College of Agriculture I.G.K.V. Raipur (C.G.) Dean M.C.A. Dhamtari . : District Dhamtari (C.G.) Dean Bhartiya Krishi College, District Durg (C.G.) ^ 10. Dean College Technology, Raipur (C.G.) of Dairy I.G.K.V.., PETITION UNDER -ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROBRIATE WRITS OF MaNDAMHS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS a o -•:.;...;p. ,/ Xt-HC-22 ai^l'^l R'li.'b 3f@RI »)*-ii<o y[?.d •g^;3(sna?ts®g|3g?iS,'ftais'i<. 3TI^T ?^NF *ii*<CTiia>*ii<;n 200 t\ I^^I' an^ilSllwHfcf 24-12-2004 Onatnentiont3ein^n»de,th^ Heard Shn Anand KymapTiw^r'i, counsel for 1tie petitioners. ShrJ ^ Sonjay S. A91'CM^I' 6ovt. Advocate for •the State/respondent No.l. Shri Kishore Bhadyri, coun« 10. Constjtution of Indwi with a praye 4>iAlTd?4l"f'q)4i<nt ^ 'feT^ •<^q+$i< ^;3]IW(3il^I cas&is faken up for hearing. for resportdents 2, 3, 4, 6. 7 and The peti'tipners, whoare stt|dents Qf under 9raduation courses nanwly B. Sc. Agrjculture, B. Tcjch. Dait'y Tecl'tnoj^y and B. Sc. Horticulture, have moved. this p4tition under Apticle 226 of the p •that respondents be ctirected to allow the petitioners tq oppear i^i the 4 cnd ;3I'd year of B. Sc. AgriculTure Course pespect'ively an<|t allow them to appear in The faited subjects of 2Iri and 1st year re^pectiyely atong wjth prosecutinig studies in the^4tf' (md 3r year' of th^ B; Sc Agricuiture Course. At the outset, very frankly Mr". Tiwari submitted that the peti^ioners case is not covered as per The regylatiop Annexure-P/1 omd K|iey are not CTtiTled for 1+ie relief asked for,as per- regulation 13.7 (^hd 13.8 oftheregulations.Their profyer is for sympathetic consideitation on the grounid of parity ond similcu' tTeatment boking to th^ eartier decision taken by •the Uniyersity, respondent No,2, Ann^xure-P/5, on 30th; Jonuary 2004 leamed counsel for -Hie petitioner > XI-HC-22 •s^i'^AplRFfc^sras, ^i'njw^ 3(I^?T 'q^W sffl^iqir R-li.* 3II^?I ai+iiqi^fsn £ WMCtl W<* "vl**********"1*** !^ ftp^r 3J]^l¥i;BIW?fftCT -a- dllow4d wher'eby-rti& stuclents were relaxing regukrt'ion 13.7,13.8 dnd submittect thidt eCiTlier Agncultui| ^AAadhya Pittdesh Agriculture Unj alrecely cnnehdedlthese regulations| thepetitioners. ; On the other hand,"l^Ar. cppearing on behatf of respondent^ 5. Agi^twal, 6ovt. Advdcate appearng that no relaxtttion coai be made! retaxation was made which was Ari faets and circumstcmcss of each a special cose. There is no othep ) ever inaide. I Perusal of Anenxure-P/5 sh( of tnaking ' relcowition lookin9 t{ circumstances of -the case ond consequences of the reloxation', and atso whether relaxation askedl educationdl excellence. Leamed counsel for the petitionerS may 4®dllow®dto mak|a ^hl'il^^T '^ffl^ ^T 'fst3t"^N^R .'^SlPOTSBt^T to dppear in ^the^examination by 1|S^ of the regulations. Me fyrther je College Raipur, was uncter •riie jversity and that University has i|, as such relief may be; grdnted to IKishore fihttdura,; leBmed counsel ;2,3,4,6,7andlQ^anclMr. 5anjay for r®!Spon<lent,No.l,submitted in the reguldtions. Only once |nexure-P/& looking to the peculiar c4se of the students and that too as jnstance where such relaxation was |>ws that the University is capdble {? the speciat ccse, faicts and ^lso taking into consideration tlie n<|iture of the relaxationsoughT for for is 90i"3 to affect or not the petitioniers subfflitted that the a de+niled representationraigini -\ XI-HC-22 sn^Tw, R-li* 3II^?T s.ti+li°ti1Hi^T ei- Barve . ^SSSsjsassft^SiS^S, I°tt1l'M*i? 3n^?rIR^T WWITSIilia' "WI. 200 i^sr' sn^?! ?^<nla< <tTea ail the points available to' them^ 27-12-2004 and respondent No| case of 1+le petitioners syinpatf^el as examination is go'ing +o be therefore, respondent No.2 fna^ repres?htdtion bf the petitiQner^ petitioners are abte to know th^i respondents have no Qbjection. l-)avin9 heard leamed coun( to the facts ond circumstan t attowed to mdke a de+aited all the points by Mpnday i.e. directed to decide The repres^i &ecember 2004 inj an objec'jiv preoectoits and dtso otherrelevdi|it repre^entation. With the direfction afoWsafcl, Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.f Parl-ies are en+itled for cer) 'kwfcf'il-f ii^df^'tezt <F']t<i< i?3lfimail^l to respondent No.2 by Monday J.e. |2 may be directed to consider the i|etically. He fur'rtier submitted that ^ommencecl from 5 JeBiuary 2005, be fur'ttier directed to decide the by 29th December 2004 so that the lir fgffe to which ledmed coun^l for ^el for thei parties and having^ regard ' ' " . / ^ of the <aase, 1+ie petitioners are to respondent No.2 raisin9 ^7-1.2-2004 andresporidentNo^ is |ntation of the petitioners by 29 •(ive nwnner i consiclering the past factors which we. mentioned in the repretsentation I, the petition stdmds disposed of. 3033/2004 also stonds disposed of. (•ified copy of Ihisorder. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo ' Judge .'y\. -[tira-<iren— \^~ <v B •wi.