IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 2586 of 2010. Decided on: 1st June, 2010. Nirmal Singh. …….Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & anr. …….Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Neeraj Maniktala, Advocate, vice counsel. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The issue raised in this petition pertains to the claim made by the petitioner for three increments on the basis of letter dated 5.12.1986. We find that Division Bench of this Court has held in favour of the petitioner by judgment dated 13.5.2008 in CWP No. 511 of 2001. We are informed that the said judgment has been implemented also. In case, the petitioner is similarly situated, he may not be discriminated. Therefore, there will be direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the case of the petitioner and also extend the similar treatment in case he is similarly situated. The needful in this regard be done within a period of two 2 months from the date of production of copy of this judgment along with copy of the writ petition. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 1st June, 2010 ( Justice Rajiv Sharma), (tr/vs) Judge.