IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.507 of 2010 JAYSU PASWAN, son of Bharduli Paswan Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 18.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 25(1-B) A, 26, 27, 35 of the Arms Act. When the petitioner was arrested with arms, he disclosed that he had gone to the place of occurrence to take possession of a piece of land on behalf of Sunil Mishra, suggesting that the petitioner is a professional. Today, a supplementary affidavit has been filed admitting that the petitioner is accused in altogether six cases some of which are also under sections 395 and 364 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the nature of the offence, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial in view of the seriousness of the nature of offence. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)