IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.16569 of 2011 Date of Decision.06.09.2011 Sanjay son of Mai Ram, Caste SC, BPL No.78 and others .....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana through the Financial Commissioner and Principal Secretary to Govt. Haryana Department of Development & Panchayat, Haryana Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Rajinder Singh Malik, Advocate for the petitioners. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he will be satisfied if the legal notice (Annexure P-6), which has been issued on behalf of the petitioner, is considered by the addressee within a particular time. 2. The legal notice shall be decided by respondent No.2 if the same is represented again along with copy of this order within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of legal notice. 3. The writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission, dispensing with notice to the respondents. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE September 06, 2011 Pankaj*