HKGH COURT OF CHHATTI$GARH EILA$PUR WRH‘ PETiTiON {Si No.3531l201i)’ ?ETITIONER Ramnaresh Dubey, 7 5m Shri Jeevan PrasadDubey, Aged about 47 years, R/o G~4, irrigatien Ccicny, Kama, District Korba (C.G.) Versus RE$§3GNQENT$ 1 $tate of C‘nhaiilsgarh, Thmugh Secraary, Pubiic Works Department; ' -DKS Bhawan, Mantraiaya, Raipur, Distr.ct Ra§pur (CG) Engineer—in-Cmef, I‘d Pubiic Woms Department, Sirpw Bhawan, Ra§pw, Si‘trN Raipur (C.G.) 3 Execut‘we Engineer, Pubhc Works Department, Korba, Désmct Kcrba (C.G.) 4 Agamdas Banjara, Assistant Engineer, PWID, Circle Offica, Biiaspur, Bistrict Biiaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETiTiGN UNDER ARTICLE 22$ GF Ti-iE CONSTETUTEQN OF ii‘éDEA Sfc nat kncwn ta the petitioner, 1V 'gpeamnce : Mr.Vinod Deghmukh, Counsei for the petitioner. Ma”. RTripathi, F’anei Lawyer fear the State.“ GRAL GRDER (1$.97.2M$} SUNEL KHMAR $INHA. J. Heard. Petiubner—Ramnaresh Dubey is warkmg on the post of Sub Engineer and is posted at Bhaisma. He has 'Chaiienged the order of transfer 0i respondent No.4— Agamdas Banjara from Biiaspur to Bhaisma. Respondeni No.4 is working on the poet of Assistant Engineer. 2 WRW PETITION (Si No.3531i2010 ‘ Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that if respondent No.4 is transferred and posted at Bhaisma’, he would be above the petitioner, therefore, the petitioner wiii have to hand over the charge of Sub-Divisional Officer to him, which now he is holding on account of being the senior most Sub-Engineer. i am surprised to hear such arguments. How a person who is not even of the cadre oi that person, who has been transferred, can chaiienge the transfer order on such grounds. i do not find any substance in the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner. The petition is liable to be and is accordingiy dismissed. i Sd/- i $UNIL KUMAR SINHA’T" ' Judge ">/<,.:el’. 99"”