IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 622 of 2009 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 11/11/2008 in WP No : 24644 OF 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1. The Vice-Chairman, Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority, Secunderabad. 2 The Land Acquisition Officer, Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority, Hyderabad. ..... APPELLANTS AND 1 B.Sastry S/o. Sri B.Narsimha, aged about 42 years, Occupation: Agriculture. 2 B.Raju S/o.Sri B.Narsimha, aged about 44 years, Occupation: Agriculture. 3 B.Ramu S/o.Sri B.Narsimha, aged about 44 years, Occupation: Agriculture. 4 B.Venugopal, B.Raju S/o. Sri B.Narasimha, aged about 38 years, Occupation: Agriculture. 5 B.Manik S/o.Sri B.Mallesh, aged about 36 years, Occupation: Agriculture. 6 B.Yadaiah S/o.Sri B.Sathaiah, aged about 40 years, Occupation: Agriculture. 7 B.Krishna S/o.Sri B.Sathaiah, aged about 36 years, Occupation: Agriculture. 8 B.Bhim Rao S/o.Sri B.Komraiah aged about 45 years, Occupation: Agriculture. All are residents of 1-52, Madhapur Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 9 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Prl.Secrtary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 10 The Chief Commissioner land Administration, A.P., Hyderabad at Nampally, Station Road, Hyderabad. 11 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, at Khairatabad, Hyderabad 12 The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Serilingampally Division, Serilingampally, Ranga Reddy District. 13 The Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 14 The Station House Officer, Madhupur Police Station, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant : M.DHANANJAY REDDY (SC FOR HUDA) Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.C.HANUMANTHA RAO The Court made the following : HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI & HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR W.A. No.622 OF 2009 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) The present writ appeal is preferred by the appellants against the order of the learned single Judge passed in W.P.No:24644 of 2008 on 11.11.2008. Heard and perused the entire material available on record. Before going into the merits of the case, it is to be noted while making some observations on the acquisition proceedings in question and considering the request of the learned Standing counsel seeking time to get the instructions, the learned single Judge has posted the writ petition after 10 days for admission. At this stage of the proceedings, the respondents-4 and 5 authorities have preferred the present appeal in the absence of any order. In these circumstances of the case, We feel it desirable to direct the registry to post the writ petition before the learned Judge having the roster. Subject to the above observation, this writ appeal is disposed of. ___________________________ Justice T. MEENA KUMARI _______________________ Justice SANJAY KUMAR Dated 25th June, 2009. Dvs HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI & HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR W.A. No.622 OF 2009 (Judgment of the Division Bench delivered by Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) Dated 25th June, 2009.