HgGH COURT OF CHE‘IJATTE3GARH llT BELASPUR DiwSiQN BENC§€ Cm'am : H$N§§LE S§§§€ @JEEV GUPTR CJ. & HON’ELE SHE? SBNIL KUMAR SENHJQ, $. Wr§t Petition €§3§L§ No.3??6 0f 25$}? WEE? PET§T§GN iiNBER ;§R'§‘38L£ 2% OF T§§§ $0M$¥WL5T§OE 8F §ND§A Pfesem: Shri CK Keshamiani, counsei fcrihe pet§iioner. Stu/i JK Gila’a, Add§tionai Advocate Generai W the Staéea I’mswndents Na? ta 3 j ?E”§“i‘f§0NER Mahaa Lal 8cm 5M0 Shri Qamedar Prasad Ssni. aged about 41 ygami $ccupat§on — Agricuiiuris? {Cui‘iwatar}, :%/¢ Bheemar yara, gaieda, Thana-gazeda, Tam — Janjgir-Champa, Distt. — Janjgir- Champa {C‘G.) Vevsus RESP$N$EN$$ 1. $ta‘te 9f Chhatt$garh Through - Seafeiary) Ufbaa Aamini$iration am! Qeveiogmarxt Depafiment; 0K5. 8hawan, Raigur {CG} 2. §irecimy Umaa Administfatign amj Devemameni Department DKE. Bhawanj Raipur (C.G.) 3. Caéiectcr, Janggir — Chamiga (CG; 4. i‘v’k. MK. Thappar; Chairman—cum- Managmg Sirec‘iaa Sauth Ea$€em Coaifieids Ltd, Seepa Road, Biiaspur. 5. Presideni Nagar Panchayai, Bamda Janggir — Champa (CG) aRBE§ (W‘ c: gpyii, 29%} The foEowing arder 0f the Cour? waS passe€§ by Ragaev Gupia, Ci Peiiiioner Mahan Lal Sam has med wis writ petmon styled as Pubi§c §nterest Litiga’imn far the foiiowing reiiei’s : “7.1 it is therefore prayed fna‘t ih‘is Hcn’bie ccurz may kind!y be pieased to cai! for the emire record of the énstani ca$e. 7.2. t Es 'Eherefore grayed that this Hon’bie Court may kindh: be p!eased to set an enqisiry by an mvesiigaiing agency eithef private er government s0 that the pub§ic money m§sused by the respondent no.5 may be ve¥ified and feeovered. 7.3 Any Other reiief which We Hon'bie court may deem m. 7.4 That t'ms Hon’bie court may kindiy be pleaeed te award the cos: of the pe‘%it§bn.“ 2) The pet§tiener has made aéiegations of, commiaeion o‘s‘ £r¥eguiaritiee by respend'ent No.5 -— Pfeeident, Nagar Panchayat, Eaioda, Jan}gir -— Champa (CG). 3) For asceriaining ihe correctness ef the aiiegat§one made by ihe geti’tioner againet respondent No.5; a “fact finding eaqu§ry" would be necessary. Such a “faci findirag enqa‘rry" sen be betrer conduo‘red by “Lokayog”, who hee its owe invearégaiion wang. 4) in rhie View 0f the maiier, we are of the opimon ihai ii wouéd be appree‘eate fer the pet§iioner ’ie approach “Lokayog” for irre redreseai er’ h§e grievaeses prejecied m the writ petttion‘ r r paams y . 5) Wifh ihe above observatien, fhe Wm peiiiéon stands d§sposed of. 6) The securiiy amount of R$.5;GOG/— depesiied by the peii‘tmner be mfuncied to the petitioner. , Sdl- Sdl-' Sinha Chief Justice Sunil Kumar Judge