IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DECEMBER 2008 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 34522 of 2008(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.M. NIZAR, PERINGATTIL HOUSE, VADACODE.P.O, KANGARAPPADY, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM. BY GP SMT.SUDHA DEVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).34522/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of December, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner is a regular stage carriage permit holder operating on the route Aluva-Ernakulam- Thevara Junction. Timings were last settled in relation to his service, on 19.4.2002. Subsequently new services have been introduced and that there has been revision of timings in respect of such services as well, it is contended. He has sought for revision of his own timings as per Ext.P4 application, which is pending orders. 2. I heard learned Government Pleader also. Respondent is to first consider and pass an order whether Ext.P4 is maintainable in terms of Rule 212 read with Rule 145(7) of the Motor Vehicles Rules. If the application is found to be maintainable, a copy of the order, along with the request for revision of the timings, shall then be considered in a timing conference. Objections to the plea for revision of W.P.(C).34522/2008 2 timings made by the petitioner, shall also be considered and a suitable decision shall be taken by the respondent. Entire process shall be completed and orders passed within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs