1 caf2825.10 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2825 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.662 OF 2010 Mrs. Shefali M. Mangulkar. ....Applicant. Vs. Milind A. Mangrulkar & ors. ....Respondents. Ms. Anjali Uthalekar i/b Shri S.S.Kulkarni for applicant. Mr. Ajit Savagave i/b. Shri S.S.Patwardhan for Respondent No.3. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.A.SAYED, JJ DATED:- AUGUST 4, 2010 P.C. 1. As per the office noting fresh notice has been issued to Respondent Nos. 1,2 and 5. Counsel for the applicant prays for permission to effect substituted service on Respondent No.1 on the ground that whereabouts of the Respondent No.1 are not known and he is not traceable. It is stated that even summons sent by the trial Court were required to be served on the Respondent No.1 by substituted service. In the circumstances, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) on condition that the applicant shall take steps to effect 2 caf2825.10 substituted service on Respondent No.1 by publication of notice in two local newspapers such as Sakal(English Edition) and Prabhat(Marathi Edition) having wide circulation in Pune and file affidavit of service on or before 23rd August, 2010. Rest of the conditional order dated 30th June, 2010 to remain as it is. 2. Application disposed of on the above terms. (A.A.SAYED, J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)