IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-712 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 2,2011 Natasha Behl................................................ Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab and another ................ Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Rahul Sharma-I, Advocate for the petitioner. ... RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the FIR in the present case has been quashed vide order dated 8.3.2011 passed in Crl. Misc. No. M-6269 of 2011 (Annexure A-1). In view of the order passed by this Court in Crl. Misc. No. M-6269 of 2011, this petition has been rendered infructuous. Disposed of as such. 2.11.2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Rupi JUDGE