1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Writ Petition No.27 of 2011 [Sudhakar Chindhuji Chanekar Vs. Divisional Commissioner & another] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Petition is received by Post. Mrs. Nandita Tripathy, APP for respondents. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATE : 18th January, 2011. 1. Petitioner prays for grant of extension of thirty days in the parole granted to him by the Divisional Commissioner. He claims that extension became necessary because he was hit by a rowdy bull and suffered injuries. 2. The Medical Certificate relied upon by the petitioner does not throw light on the gravity of injuries suffered by the petitioner. 3. Moreover, Divisional Commissioner, who is the Competent Authority, was not satisfied with the ground for extension of parole. 2 4. Petition does not disclose any reasons as to why the order of Divisional Commissioner should be considered to be illegal. The petition cannot be considered as a mercy petition. 5. The grounds do not disclose reasons for entertaining the petition. 6. We, therefore, dismiss the petition. 7. Steno copy of this order be supplied to learned APP for communicating the contents thereof to the prisoner through the Superintendent of the Jail concerned. Judge Judge |Hedau|