XI‘HC—78 mmi‘zaw wmm Wmivwm ‘ ammm PETITIGNER Versus RESPONDENTS 1. 3. -0 1 -200 2 9 Shli Virsndra S None for the mS H€ard By the present pt: diredtion to tha raSpond patitioner and also prom Lsanled counS€1 made representation dated 2 respondent No.1 for re( date no action has been petition may be dispose p€Titionar has Motiram Pmmi, S/ o. Shn‘ Santram, aged bout 48 years, (Junior Assista11t), C.G. tate Ware Housing Corporation, 'ranch-Charama, Distt. Kanker (CG) mmrn State through — Ware Housing its Managing ‘ he Personnel Manager, C.G. State Ware Hausing Corporation (Head Oflce) 22, r%1a.nd Nagar, Raipur (CG) C hhattisgarh C )rporation, Lrector, 22 Anand Nagar, Raipur (CG) D T WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 i 227 OF THE TITUTION OF INDIA " tition the petitioner has prayed for a ants to give benefit pf Kramonnti to the otion to the higher post. for the petitioner submits that the several representations including 0.9.2008 (Annexure P—4) before the tressal of his grievances, however, tiil taken He further submits that instant i of With a direction to the lespondent \ K h p S <%\ mm y W100 mm (Wu) mama?“ ,. L, WW§WW 1 $aif‘anm No.1‘ to decids the 20.9.2008 (Ammxure I In Vi€w of abov p6titi0n€n the instant petitioner to approach copy of “this ordér wi approach being madf consider and ' d€cid€ pending bsfom him Wi1 ' receiptfproduction of‘ with, KaW, on its own IQ CErtiiied copy as ‘mpmwntation of 111E p€tition€r dated ‘-4) Within the specified period. 3 submission of learned counsel for the petition i5 disposed of with liberty to the before the respondeni No.1 along with thin 10 days fmm‘ today and on such the respondent No, 1 is diiected to the representation of Annexure P-4 hin a period of six’iweeks from the date of pertified copy of thi order, in accordance \ ; Elit. f i Sd/_ per rules. Dhirendra Mishra Judge