@ ^a ^ *^ J^ ^. igMii-; c. ^ iw (2) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. /'^ /208fr ^/ PETITIONER ^•^ ^^L- •^'^r~ ^-Kamal Singh Paikara S/o Shri Sadh Ram Paikara >'-.ltfs~''"' .^ k!^''' ..••'*' AQe about 44 years, AssistantTeacher, .••'' ^?-L' ^.^^y ^••"' A® RESPONDENTS 3^^ ^O^^fo &<^^^ -. ^* dy k''" S.C. Girls Hostel, Birtarai, Block - Kartala, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) VERSUS 1,^ State Government of Chhattisgarh Through:- Secretary, Tribal & Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner TribalWelfare Department, Korba (C.G.) 3, DistrictEducation Officer Korba (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer Kartala, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Petitioner most humbly submit as under :- y^0-' HI6H COURT OF WHATTKGAfW AT BILASPUR W. P. fSl No. 111 of 2007 Petitioners : Hemant Singh Kamwr ond another Versus Respondents : State Sovemment of Chhattisgarh andofhers w. p. ra No. 112 of 2007 Petitioner : Chunni Singh AAarkom Ver.sus Respondents : State Sovemment of Chhdrttisyrh and others w. p. ra No. 114 of 2007 Petitioner : Kamal Smgh Paikani Versus Respondents : Storte ©owmmentof Chhath'sgarh andothers W. P. fS) No. 115 of 2007 Petitioner : Phulsny Paikara Versus Respondents : State Sovemment of Chhattisgarh andothers And W. P. fS) No. 116 <rf 2007 Petitioner : Pramod Singh Puikan Versus Respondents : State Sovemment of Chhattisgarh ondo'fhers SB: Hon'bte Mr. Justice Satish K. Xgnihotri. J Shri Ajay 5hrivastava, Advocate for the petitioners. 5mt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy fiovemment Advoccrte for the rMpondents/State. ORDER fassed on 16 day of Janwuy. 2007) The followring order of -the Court- is passed by Satish K. Agnihotri. J. 1. Leamed counsel qppearing for 1he petitioners as well as leamed Dqiirty ffovemment Advocate oppearirq for the respondents/State jomtly submit •that the facts of •the present ccBe ore similar to that of in W. P. (s) 6108 of 2006 (Rajkumari W/o M.K. Oilliwar Vs. Ttie Stnte 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh A oihsrs). which was diaposed of vide opder derted 8 November. 2006. They further submit •that the questwn of km involved is also -the same. 2. In yiew of +he above stated submissions made by leamed counsel for •the part-ies, these writpetitions are disposed of in terms of the orcter dated 8th November. 20)6 passed by ih'is Court jn W. P. (s) 6108 of 2006. No orcter as to costs. 3. A eopy of this order be placed on record in oltier connected writ petitions. Bablu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge