1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 201 OF 2011 (Thamdeo Vitthal Chaudhary vs. The Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur Division, Nagpur & Anr.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mrs. Suhasini Deshpande, Advocate (appointed) for the petitioner. Mrs. Ketki Joshi, APP for the respondents. ….. CORAM : MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & M.L. TAHALIYANI, JJ. APRIL 20, 2011. Heard Mrs. Deshpande, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Joshi, learned APP for the respondents. The petitioner preferred an application for parole on 29.10.2010 on the ground of construction of his house on the land which has been allotted to him under Indira Awas Yojana. The said application came to be rejected by an order dated 24.12.2010. Being aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner has preferred this petitioner praying that the said order be set aside and he be granted parole. The affidavit filed by the Superintendent of Central Prison, Nagpur, shows that the petitioner was released on parole for 30 days on 22.06.2010 on the very same ground. The said period was extended by 2 another 30 days. Accordingly, the petitioner surrendered after a period of 60 days i.e. on 22.08.2010. It is pointed out that within a period of two months thereafter, he has preferred this application on the very same ground and hence the application is rejected. Obviously, the petitioner after being granted parole on such a ground, cannot make repeated application within such a short time. He was released for sufficiently long period of time in order to construct his house. Hence, we do not find any error in the order of authorities rejecting his application for parole. Needless to say that if the petitioner after some period of time, prefers an application for parole, the same be decided expeditiously on its own merit. Petition is disposed of with above observations. The advocate appointed for the petitioner be paid fees as per rules. Office to communicate this order to the petitioner, who is in Central Prison, Nagpur. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.