IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION. 139 OF 2006 APPLICATION. 139 OF 2006 APPLICATION. 139 OF 2006 Hasan Kadar Shaikh .... Applicant versus State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents. Ms. Pranali Kakade for the appellant. Ms. S.V. Gajare APP for State. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.M. KANADE, J. V.M. KANADE, J. V.M. KANADE, J. DATED; DATED; DATED; JANUARY 27, 2006. JANUARY 27, 2006. JANUARY 27, 2006. P.C: P.C: P.C: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is arrested in connection with an offence punishable under section 307, 147, 148, 149,324, 504 of IPC vide C.R.No. 431 of 2005, which is registered with Wansorie Police station. It is alleged that the applicant along with others assaulted the complainant since he had come to the rescue of two girls, who were being harassed by the applicant and his colleagues. It is alleged by the prosecution that the injuries on the person of the complainant are on the vital parts of the body and grievous in nature. The learned counsel on behalf of the applicant submits that the injuries are not serious and the co-accused are released on bail and the applicant shall not enter the jurisdiction of the said police station where the witnesses are residing. It is not possible to accept the said submission. The Sessions court has given cogent reasons while rejecting the application of the present applicant for bail. The present applicant had inflicted serious injuries on the vital parts of the body of the complainant. There is every possibility that the applicant may pressurise the girls who are eye witnesses to the incident. In the circumstances, the application for bail is rejected. The charge sheet has been filed. The trial is expedited. ...