^JMnSj ^* ^E^fi"; p.ft.Na c - ^edb^E^..------- dalcd.---- IN THE.HIGH COURT OP JUDICATURE CHHATTISGAJiH AT BILASPUR W.PtNO. 3'"?-S^, / Peutioner Dl"'r><-ifl j^Asajj.i.LAi.J ^ Respondents Defettdatlts Versus :I^ 2. ^M"""^ r^i23u^ '^' i-inif ''ftr. u*«tc 3. 4. 6. o. 9. 10. 11. SBttt, Saiaarin Bai @,.Cliapyin Ba' W/o Shyaoi Suadar^Sgedabout 55 years, R/o Pawani, Tafasil — Bflaigarh, Dist: Raipur-(C.Gj Sadhurani 8/'o Lahria Sataarai, Aged ab6Ut 35 yeafS, R/6 Lukapaea, Tahsil - Bilaigarh.Dist: Ealpur-i'C.G.) Chandrashekar S/o Man^u Ram Sataami Aged about 15 years, R/o Lukapara, Tahsfl - BHaigarh, Dist : Raipur-{C.G.) Anchu Ram 3/o Darasrarn Kahra Aged ab6Ut 35 yeafs, R/6 G6?iiidvatt,Tafesil - Bilaigarh, Dist: Raipur-(C.G.l Santdas S/o Ghasia Satnami Aged about 12 years, Through Guardian Mother Snit. Kanala Bai W/o Ghasia Satnami R/o Lukapara, Tahsil — Baloda Bazar, Dist : Raipur-(C.G.) Rajaran S/o Fatdra Satnami Village Chirra, PO - Tundri, Dist : Raipur-i'C.G.) Goverrunent of Madhya Pradesh Through - Couector, Dist: Raipur-fC.G.) Nanki Noni S/o Dhanau Satnaini Aged about 65 years, Village Pandri, Via Pamgarh, Dist: Bilaspur»{C.G.) Baij-urajn S/o Kh-ublia Satnajni Aged about 40 years, Village Murpara, P.0 - Parsadih, Dist: 8aipur-(C.<3.) Ratfa Sain S/o Khublia Satnami Aged about 35 years, ViIIage — Murpara, P.0. — Parsadih,Dist: Raipur-(C.G,5 Karma Bai D/o Khublia Satoaroi Pfftttt Bai D/& Kftublia Safnaini •^ 12. Mem Bai D/o Khubfia Sataami Respondents 10 to 12 R/o Village Lukapara, Post pavnl Dist: Raipur-iC.G.) 13. Gita Rain S/o <?bedu Rainteli, Aged about 21 years, Viflage Vou PO Pavnl, Dist: Kaipur-(C.G-) • - s •' 14. Ghasi Ram S/o SaiBaru Satnamai, Aged about 40 years, R/o ViBagc- LuJcapara Pavni, Dist; Raipur-{C,G.) 15. Dayaram S/o Satnaru, Aged about 35 years, R/o Vfllage ~ Lukapara Pavnl, Dist: Rajpur-fC.G.) 16. Tyaram S/o Bacoran Domar V31a.ge - Goviiidvaa PO-Bilaigarh, Dist : Saipur- WRIT PETITIQN U/A 227 OFTHE CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA The above named petitioner most humbly ajid respectfully begs to subnat as iiader : XI-HC-78 *11*<MI Stl*1|tb TSg'SiraicTO, i?Tf)tf<IS, la|<11t(y .6y.f^;3>.S^.|. •3^c;^'&-j— ^ 200 £ STI^T IT3W (Ii?^P^F) sf^f w R-ii* OTT 3TI^?r OTRi r ^^uf^ ?T(nWflficT3n^T 8.12.2006 Shri S.K.Guha. coiiasel Ofiice has nointed out o Leamed coiinsel for th removiaa the defaults wit.hm s Let necessarv steps be this petition shaU stand Bench. disinfssed <oi<il<'i<fli *<iinTftteI^<Ri«i< ^aa^fl'an^T for the petitioner. srtaui defaults iu fhis case. e petitioner subinits that he will be period of 10 davs. taken within 10 davs, failine which, wifhout further reference to the Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge P.T.O. XI-HC-78 ~SS[ ^|i|||viq, »T(1'M'I<D, RlclKHy s^s^,, *11*<WI shHlch .IA^;.P^. z^l/i^ W=[ 200 Sll^l llrfcb (lic<l3«l<3.iiT) sn^rqirR-fi* cP(T3[WTsh*11«b <tll'!<l<1<)1-< tlllfll'fffS^t'A'KK ^srf^TSn^T 27-02-2007: This W.P.fPR) No. 3341/2006 is treated as dismissed for non- compliance of peremptory order dated 08-12-2006. (For details note sheet part may kindly be seen.) Counsel be infbrmed accordinsly. j, Sd/- A.R.(J) DA. P.T.O.