1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 10677 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 10677 OF 2010 *** 1. Heard Advocate Mr. Salunke for Petitioner and Advocate Mr. Pawar for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. 2. Dispute has been filed in the year 1994 and in it amendment has been sought for in the year 2001. By amendment, effort was to bring on record certain material to show how membership of society has been given to petitioner. Cooperative Court rejected that prayer and Cooperative Appellate Court in appeal, filed by present petitioner, maintained it. 3. Learned counsel contends that amended provisions of Order VI Rule 17 C.P.C. are not applicable and as there is no irreparable loss the amendment ought to have been granted. Advocate Mr. Pawar for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 contends that facts already within knowledge are sought to be impleaded 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 10677 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. after seven years of filing dispute. According to him, defence of absence of membership was well known and new inconsistent story is now sought to be introduced. 4. The Courts below have concurrently applied their mind and rejected the prayer for amendment. I do not notice any jurisdictional error or perversity. Hence I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. 5. With liberty to petitioner to challenge that order, after dispute is finally decided, present writ petition is disposed of. No costs. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:14/02/2011. ans/10677