IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19.01.2011 CORAM:- The Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. SUDHAKAR W.P. No. 15045 of 2008 Hameed Bivi .. Petitioner Vs. 1. THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, CHENNAI- 9. 2 THE CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR, TAMIL NADU HOUSING BOARD, CHENNAI. 3 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER & ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER (E) VILLUPURAM HOUSING UNIT, TAMIL NADU HOUSING BOARD VILLUPURAM. 4 THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER TAMIL NADU HOUSING BOARD, GUNDU SAALAI CUDDALORE-607001. 5 THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND ACQUISITION) HOUSING SCHEME, SEMMANDALAM, CUDDALORE. .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records and quash the notice dated 27.6.2007 issued by the third respondent and further proceedings thereon and consequently issue a Mandamus forbearing respondents 2 to 5 from evicting the petitioner from the property measuring 1650 sq.ft. and bearing plot No.7 in S.No.21/5 in Janalakshmi Nagar Extension Veli Semmandalam Village Cuddalore Taluk, Cuddalore District except through process of civil Court. For Petitioner : Ms. Manjula Bhaskar For Respondents : Mr. L.S.M. Hasan Fizal Govt. Advocate – R1 & R5 Mr. A. Vijayakumar – R2 to R4 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ ORDER This writ petition is filed to call for the records and quash the notice dated 27.6.2007 issued by the third respondent and further proceedings thereon and consequently issue a Mandamus forbearing respondents 2 to 5 from evicting the petitioner from the property measuring 1650 sq.ft. and bearing plot No. 7 in S.No.21/5 in Janalakshmi Nagar Extension Veli Semmandalam Village Cuddalore Taluk, Cuddalore District except through process of civil Court. 2. The impugned order does not suffer from any error apparent on the face of the record for the reason that the person, who has filed the present writ petition is not the owner of the land from whom, the land was acquired for the purpose of housing scheme. The petitioner claim to be the subsequent purchaser. In view of the concluded acquisition proceedings, which is not disputed, no relief as prayed for can be granted. There is no merit or legal right for the petitioner to pray for the relief as sought in the writ petition. Consequently, the writ petition challenging the impugned proceedings fails and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar ra To 1. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, CHENNAI- 9. 2 THE CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR, TAMIL NADU HOUSING BOARD, CHENNAI. 3 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER & ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER (E) VILLUPURAM HOUSING UNIT, TAMIL NADU HOUSING BOARD VILLUPURAM. 4 THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER TAMIL NADU HOUSING BOARD, GUNDU SAALAI CUDDALORE-607001. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5 THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND ACQUISITION) HOUSING SCHEME, SEMMANDALAM, CUDDALORE. 1 cc To Mr.A.Vijayakumar, Advocate, SR.3985 WP No. 15045 of 2008 vsv(co) pmk.17.2.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/