IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 28TH AUGUST 2008 / 6TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 25985 of 2008(R) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- P.SIVANANDAN,S/O CHOYIKUTTY, AGED 50 YEARS, PAROL HOUSE, PARAPPANGADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SANTHEEP ANKARATH RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, LOCAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL ADMINISTRATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM. 3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM. 4. PARAPPANGADI GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PARAPPANGADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 5. P.K. MOHAMMED JAMAL, S/O LATE AVUKKADARKUTTY NAHA, GREEN VIEW, ANJAPPURA, PARAPPANGADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 6. MOHAMMEDKUTTY NAHA, KIZHAKKINIYAKATH, GRADE, CHETTIPPADY, PARAPPANGADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 25985 OF 2008 R ==================== Dated this the 28th day of August, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that he is aggrieved by Ext.P4 resolution passed by the 4th respondent Panchayat. According to him, seeking to get the said resolution cancelled, he has moved the 1st respondent by filing Ext.P5 invoking its power under Section 191 of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act. In this writ petition, what is sought for by the petitioner is an expeditious disposal of Ext.P5 keeping in abeyance Ext.P4 resolution. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, Ext.P5 invoking power of the 1st respondent under Section 191 of the Kerala Panchayat Raj has been received by it, the 1st respondent should consider the matter and expeditiously dispose of the same. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing that within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment, final orders on Et.P5 shall be passed by the 1st respondent. It is also clarified that in the meanwhile, it will be open to the petitioner to move the 1st respondent WPC 25985/08 :2 : seeking interlocutory orders as sought for by him in Ext.P5 itself, in which case that will be considered. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp