IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.2956 of 2009(O&M) Date of decision: 22.5.2009 Dharmender ......Petitioner Versus Saroj ......Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Satish Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. * * * Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) CM No.12522-CII of 2009 CM is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CR No.2956 of 2009 The petitioner who is the husband of the respondent has filed this revision petition challenging the order dated 26.3.2009 whereby the Additional District Judge, Narnaul vide impugned order has fixed a sum of Rs.1500/- per month as maintenance pendente lite to be paid to the respondent-wife by the petitioner during the pendency of the divorce petition. The grouse of the petitioner is that the impugned order has been passed by the trial Court in haste and without considering the factum of the income of the petitioner. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Vide impugned order, while affixing the maintenance pendente lite, the Additional District Judge, Narnaul has found that the petitioner is an able bodied person and was capable of earning. It is not disputed that even a daily-wager can earn about Rs.3000/- to Rs.4,000/- per month. In view of the aforesaid fact, I do not find any ground to interfere in the impugned order. Dismissed. May 22, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE