IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11000 of 2011 Ram Byash Thakur Versus Ambika Thakur & Ors ----------- 02. 14.07.2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ application has been filed against the order dated 17.03.2011 passed by Munsif I, Buxar in Title Suit No.29 of 2007 whereby the learned Court below rejected the application dated 25.10.2010 filed by the plaintiff-petitioner for recalling the order dated 11.06.2010. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he has filed objection to the Pleader Commissioner’s report on 09.08.2010 but the learned Court below without deciding the said objection has confirmed the Pleader Commissioner’s report and when the plaintiff filed the application for recall of this said order conforming the Pleader Commissioner’s report, the learned Court below by the impugned order dated 17.03.2011 refused to recall the order. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the Pleader Commissioner submitted 2 his report on 19.04.2010 and on the said date, both the parties were present. No objection was filed till 11.06.2010 and on the prayer of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiff-petitioner; the Pleader Commissioner’s report was confirmed. Subsequently, after confirming the objection, petition has been filed on 04.08.2010. The ground has been taken that the petitioner has no knowledge about the submissions of the Pleader Commissioner’s report. As stated above from perusal of the order dated 11.06.2010, it is clear that the learned counsel was present in the Court below and submitted that the Pleader Commission’s report be confirmed. Therefore, I find no merit in this writ application and accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. Sanjeev/- (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)