THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.7247 of 2010 Dated:21.10.2010 Between: K.Mahesh. ….Petitioner And The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Represented through the Commissioner GHMC, Lower Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad, And others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.7247 of 2010 ORDER: The grievance of the petitioner in the writ petition is that the fourth respondent, who is his neighbour, obtained permission to construct a multistoreyed commercial complex in his property bearing No.6-1-339/2 & 3, Padma Rao Nagar, Secunderabad, and started construction. The petitioner alleges that the fourth respondent is storing the construction material on the road and causing inconvenience to the public as well as the petitioner. The petitioner filed a complaint, dated 19.03.2010, before the municipal authorities, respondent Nos.1 to 3 herein, bringing to their notice the nuisance created by the fourth respondent, and requested them to take necessary action. In spite of giving a complaint, as no action has been taken against the fourth respondent, the petitioner filed the instant writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondent Nos.1 to 3 in not taking action against the fourth respondent as illegal and arbitrary, and for a consequential direction to respondent Nos.1 to 3 to take appropriate action. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3 has placed before this Court a brief report regarding the dumping of building material/debris by the fourth respondent on the road margin. As per the said report, it is clear that after inspection, the municipal authorities have already issued a notice to the fourth respondent under Section 402 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955, and also imposed penalty. It is further stated by the learned Standing Counsel that the entire building material was removed from the road margin. The same is recorded. Since the respondents have already acted on the representation of the petitioner, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. The Writ Petition is accordingly closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ (N.V.RAMANA, J) 21.10.2010 vs