W W a1 200 , W mam,m Wm (W) mwm amwémm WWW §R§WR . %3Tl%man%¥1 5% :' HGNEE SHRI 3HIRENDR’A MI$HRA J TR. PET‘ i‘CRIMENAL NO. OZIZGO§1 APPLKANT Vé. . .RE$?§NDENT-5 .1.- 27 0? 3007 .. 5hr! Malay Kr Bhadur: counsel for fhe applicam' 5hr: U K S Chanda! F Shri Alok Pandey, cal Heard. Annapurna Singh Parihar, Wife ofjTahar, Sing’h-Parihar, aged ‘abou'r Z5 lyears, residenf of af presenf 5hvam Bazaar Amwg 5951' Tahsa! & P S Amng Dis‘mc: 'Ratpur 5+afe af Chha‘i‘fxsgarh +‘nr0ugh P 5 Lorm: DisTr-Icf Blbspur (C6) PROEECU'IION Nahar Singh Pamhar‘ 5/0 fai’e Khujan ‘ Smgh Pamhar aged about 3O year's 'Amola Bai, w’iciow of Ia‘fe Khajan Singh Parihdr aged aboU‘l’ 50 year‘s GulJar Singh son of la‘re KhaJan Smgh ' Panhur aged abou‘r £5 years ghanu @ Sari'fa Smgh aged abouf " years daughter af lafe KhaJan Slngh Darlhur All Paglderi‘i’ of Lormi Posf Tahsii andw? P 5 Lam“ Dismcf Bihspur (C6) L for ’rhe Sfa‘l'e/resp No 1 msel for respondem‘ No. 2 1’0 5. ‘ x14+1c4s m V I ' r m 200 Wm (333W) $§$§$ > mwm _ Wmggm _-L- V’Tfie appiican'f haé praiFer‘red fhis upplica+§on under Secfion 407 of fhe Cr.P.C. far Transferring fhe criminai case No. 1244/2005 peViding iii fhe Caur? 6f JudiJFial Magis‘i‘mw Fix-sf Class, Mungeli (Sfafe ,Vs Tuhar 5m9h & Ofhers The‘reasons aséigned for fiiing +his 'hpphcai‘ion ls ‘fha'r respondeqHi’ No.2 1c 5 are Ioca! residem‘s of Lormi. If is aileged by 'fhe apphcanV 141a? her fa'rher Dr. Kamn Sif‘gh mceivzd a +hrea*gning_t§§i from i‘ha h€cus€d Tahar Sirtgh and his ‘bro‘r‘ner V , 6u‘jcm Singhidir‘ec‘tiag him #0 mke baék fhe criminal case file& cf The ‘ ms‘mme o‘F The pe‘fi‘howr or else fhey shaH be racing dire canszquenceg Affe. recenmg +he above #eiephone cad! a wrw‘i'an 7 r repor+ was bdged by fa+her of 1112 apphcam’ wde Armexura P-4 I? is furiher argued ‘rhaf fhree sfher‘ maffer‘s befweer1 +he ‘ game purfies - qpphcafwiq Lmder 5ec+lon 125 0f fhe Cr'.P.C., apphca'hw uviaer Secficm 13 0f ‘H’Ie Hinéu Marriage Ac‘f ané appiicm'ion undei" Secnen 27 of The Hindu Marriage ac? are aka pending in fhe Family Caurt Rmpur > I On ilie o‘i’her hand cibunSel for i’ne mm apelicarrrg submh‘s 'fha’r fhe apialican’rs are also m? i‘ne resieeme 0f Murageli us +l1ey are residing a? Lormi which is some 25 kms. {ram Mungeli (1rd a false csmplain'l’ has been ladged in order 1'0 ge'i’ The case inansferred. W X’I«Hc.78 J ' ...;.-.;_.;....i.;.‘.v;'.;....;.: a m ‘ am% mm (W) Vmm&wm m asamémv . .bv V aunsei for fhe par'fles ’r‘ of uccuwd persons and pamcuhr‘w accused per$ons fwo are femaks and if would no+ be proper To +y~ansfer fhe Jdgcié! Magis-rmm Fim muss, Munge“ m , weuta 52 served hc we we: ceuw cw umaem‘é m his Cour? during +f Lire safe'fy of 1'he apphcarr? whde she hirendra Mishra I Judge I'have heard harned c Lookmg +0 ‘Hie aumb: considermg ‘I‘ha‘w‘l-oui of {our .fhey.;are, residEéi§+s bf Lafmi . ma'rfer from 'i'he Couf‘f of’Ju Ralpur and ends of Jushce ‘ Mange}: is‘ dwec+ed f0 ens 1e mat of fine cmmma! case Sd/- D