IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 19TH OCTOBER 2009 / 27TH ASWINA 1931 RP.No. 985 of 2009(Y) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.19102/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -------------------------------- V.S.ALPHONSA, VELIKKAKATH ARUKATTIL HOUSE, KARUVELIPPADI, THOPPUMPADY,KOCHI. BY ADVS. MR.P.DEEPAK SMT.APARNA RAJAN RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT EXECUTIVE OFFICER, KERALA MOTOR TRANSPORT WORKERS WELFARE FUND BOARD, PALARIVATTOM, ERNAKULAM. 2. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REP.BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO LABOUR DEPARTMENT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,ERNAKULAM. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J ............................................... R.P. No. 985 of 2009 ................................................. Dated this the 19th day of October, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner seeks review of my judgment dated 12.9.2007 in W.P(C) No. 19102/07. The ground on which review is sought is that the judgment was rendered without hearing the counsel for the petitioner, who was absent on the date of hearing. Even assuming that the petitioner has sufficient reason to seek the review on the ground of absence of the counsel for the petitioner on the date of hearing, I am not inclined to review the same, since the judgment was rendered on merits and even after hearing the counsel for the petitioner, I am not inclined to take a different view. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE rhs