IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** FAO No.355 of 1998 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 28.09.2010 **** Union of India . . . . Appellant Vs. Harpal Singh . . . . Respondent **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN **** Present: - None for the appellant. Mr.Sham Lal Bhalla, Advocate for the respondent. **** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN J. (ORAL) CM No.21080-CII-2010 and FAO No.355 of 1998 Notice in the application was issued on 23.8.2010 for today. As per office report, learned counsel for the non-applicant/ appellant has been informed. No one has put in appearance despite notice. Learned counsel for the applicant/respondent submits that the present appeal is squarely covered by a decision of this Court rendered in FAO No.349 of 1998 titled as “Union of India and another Vs. Pritam Singh Jagpal” decided on 12.5.2010. Relying upon the statement made by learned counsel for the applicant/respondent, this application is allowed and the main appeal bearing FAO No.355 of 1998 is also disposed of in terms of a decision of this Court rendered in FAO No.349 of 1998 titled as “Union of India and another Vs. Pritam Singh Jagpal” decided on 12.5.2010, subject to all just exceptions. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) SEPTEMBER 28, 2010 JUDGE Vivek