IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 18049 of 2008 Between: 1 Mohd. Farooq Khalidi, S/o. Shaik Ibrahim Khalidi, R/o. 18-7-299/119/A, Amanagar, Hyd. 2 Mohd.Shafi Khalid, S/o. Gul Mohd, Khan, R/o. 18-11-114, Barkas, Hyd. 3 Syed Omer Bin Saleh Jeelani, S/o. aljilana Bin Habib Ali, R/o. 18-13-182/A/2, Bandlaguda, Barkas, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyd. 2 The Secretary, Andhra Pradesh Wakf board, Hyderabad. 3 Sri. Khaja Moin Uddin, S/o. Khaja Arif Uddin, H.No.18-11-31, Barkas, Hyderabad. 4 Smt. Mubeena Moin, W/o. Khaja Moin Uddin, H.No.18-11-31, Barkas, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the 1) 1st Respondent to stop all proceedings of payment of compensation to 3rd and or 4th respondent for the acquired part of the schedule property and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem ﬁt and proper in the interest of natural justice, 2) direct the second respondent to take over the physical possession ofthe Wakf Property of Dargah Hazrath Khalid Bin Jan Nisar Yar Jung, as recorded in the wakf records Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.RAJAGOPAL REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: . The Court made the following : O R D E R: This Writ Petition has been ﬁled by the petitioners who are three in number with a prayer to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Commissioner, GHMC-R1 to stop the proceedings of payment of compensation to Sri.Khaja Moin Uddin-R3 and Mubeena Moin-R4 for the acquired part of property in road widening process. The petitioners claim that the property acquired by 1st respondent in road widening belongs to Wakf property. It is the contention of R3 and R4 that the property acquired by the 1st respondent in road widening belongs to them and therefore they are entitled to claim the compensation. A fact remains that the enquiry is pending before the Land Acquisition Oﬃcer with regard to the ﬁxation of compensation for the land acquired in the process of road widening. Since the award enquiry is pending the petitioners are at liberty to put all their objections before the concerned Land Acquisition Oﬃcer. Reserving the said liberty, this writ petition is dismissed. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. 7th November, 2008. (B.Seshasayana Reddy,J) tnb ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{LS} THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.18049 OF 2008 7T H NOVEMBER, 2008.