IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No.6552-C of 2009 & RSA NO.2189 OF 2009 DECIDED ON : 11.11.2009 Mange Ram ...Appellant versus Umed Singh ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. Pardeep P. Chahar, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Deepender Ahlawat, Advocate for the respondents. **** 1.Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) On 12.08.2009, notice of motion was issued with respect to some deduction on the ground that the suit was filed few days before the end of limitation. Learned counsel for both the parties are agreed that as per decree upto 31.10.2009 the total amount due is Rs.81,000/- odd. Learned counsel for the appellant states that the appellant has already deposited a sum of Rs.63,000/-. In my opinion, the interest of justice would be served if the appellant deposits another amount of Rs.10,000/- before the Executing Court on or before the date fixed viz 14.12.2009. The judgments and decrees of the Courts below are modified to this extent. It is however, made clear that in case the amount is RSA NO.2189 OF 2009 -2- not so deposited on the date fixed, this appeal shall be deemed to be dismissed. Consequently, this appeal and application for stay are disposed of. November 11, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE