IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6178 of 2009 1. PRABHAT PASWAN @ PRABHAT KUMAR 2. Ajeet Paswan 3. Pappu Paswan Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 17.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners are named in the F.I.R. with specific allegation but in that also claim to reach the place of occurrence is made after the occurrence and further, it is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that informant is more clear in her further statement that due to enmity only suspicion is caste, otherwise there is no witness at all in the case diary to state the involvement of the petitioners as eye witness. No doubt, investigation of the case is in progress but till now, there is no material for evidence to show that petitioners caused the death and there was anyone to watch the same. Considering the above discussed facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Sadar (Hajipur) P.S. Case No. 372 of 2008, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. However, in the case charge-sheet is submitted and 2 case is heard on the point of framing of the charge, the material collected by the I.O. shall be taken to reconsider the bail to justify its continuation. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)