1 hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 719 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 416 OF 2008 Amol VAsant Deokar ... Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr.S.R. Pasbola for the applicant. Mr. J.P. Yagnik, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : NARESH H.PATIL & K.U. CHANDIWAL,JJ. DATED : JULY 18, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard. 2. The accused applicant Amol Deokar, a life convict, has urged to release him on bail. The learned counsel has relied upon evidence of complainant Deepak Sharma to castigate that he was not a reliable witness, there is no other evidence to connect accused with the offence. The counsel also submits that since other two accused are released on bail the accused deserves bail. 2 3. We have gone through the record. Perused the earlier orders. We find that complainant Deepak in para 3 of his evidence in unequivocal terms illustrates the role of the accused Amol Deokar as having held sword and assaulted deceased Santosh Shinde. Other person who caught said Santosh, faced order of rejection of bail. The involvement of applicant is writ large. In the result, application lacks merit. Dismissed. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.) (NARESH H. PATIL,J.)