IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10650 of 2011 SHAMA PARWEEN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.04.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the second wife is being prosecuted by the first wife in connection with Khajakalan P.S. Case No. 208 of 2006 registered under Sections 498, 406, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It appears that on 07.07.2007 the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail but she failed to furnish bail bond in the matter. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that now the matter has been reconciled and the petitioner is staying with the husband and under misconception the petitioner could not furnish the bail bond in the matter. It is expected from the learned court below to release the petitioner on regular bail if the petitioner appears within a period of four weeks from today provided the husband agrees to be one of the bailors 2 of the petitioner. With this observation, this application is disposed off. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)