IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43655 of 2010 1. RAJEEV KUMAR 2. MANOJ KUMAR ------------------------- PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 12.1.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioners are alleged for demanding ransom of Rs. 1,50,000/- and on non-payment is alleged for abuse, snatching Rs. 18,600/- and a chain of gold. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that petitioner no.1 is employee of complainant who is in habit of making false allegations otherwise Gaya Kotwali P.S. Case No. 305/10 is lodged against Binod alias Ghantu in which also allegation is about snatching of cash and chain, is doubted also. Observation made by learned Sessions Judge appears also non-application of mind as observing no serious, petitioners’ prayer for anticipatory bail has been refused without any reason. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on 2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Complaint Case No. 1255/10, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)