In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh RFA No. 1493 of 1992 (O&M) Siri Chand (deceased) through LRs ... Appellant vs State of Haryana .... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. D. D. Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal J. The landowner is in appeal before this court for enhancement of compensation for the acquisition of land. Briefly, the facts are that vide notification dated 29.6.1985, issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act'), the State of Haryana acquired land situated in District Kurukshetra, for construction of Haryana Irrigation Research Station, on Kurukshetra-Pehowa Road. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short, “the Collector”) assessed the market value of the land at ` 34,500 per acre. Dissatisfied with the award of the Collector, the landowners/claimants filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned court below vide award dated 12.2.1992, determined the market value of the acquired land at ` 20/- per square yard (` 96,800 per acre). It is this award which is impugned in the present appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the claim of the appellant in the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of this court in R.F.A. No. 1318 of 1992 – Sunhera Ram vs State of Haryana, decided on 19.11.2009, whereby the compensation payable to the landowners was further enhanced to ` 1,20,000 per acre. Learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana, did not dispute this factual position. For the detailed reasons recorded in Sunhera Ram's case (supra), the appeal is disposed of in the same terms. 19.7.2010 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge