IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.29/2009 Union of India and others Versus Shri Vijay Electricals DATE OF ORDER --- December 16,2010 PRESENT HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE PREM SHANKER ASOPA Mr.B.N.Sandu, for the applicants BY THE COURT (1) Heard learned counsel for the applicants. (2) At the outset, counsel for the applicants submit that the Objection application u/s 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short `the Act of 1996') has been wrongly filed before this Court and since the Principal City Civil Court, Ajmer will have the jurisdiction to hear the same under Section 34 of the Act of 1996, the Objection application is not maintainable. However, counsel further submits that the period of pendency of the Objection application filed before this Court may be excluded while counting the period for filing application u/s 34 of the Act of 1996 before the Principal City Civil Court, Ajmer. (3) The aforesaid Objection application filed u/s 34 of the Act of 1996 is dismissed as not maintainable. However, the applicants are at liberty to claim the benefit of the period of pendency of the objection application before this Court to exclude the said period while counting limitation for filing of the Objection application before the Principal City Civil Court, Ajmer. (Prem Shanker Asopa) J. गोpa ल