HIQH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT §ILA5fUk Cr,M.P.Na.445 of 2009 1. wash vpadhya (Age-$4) yrs. 5/0 kamoshmy Upadhya 5/3“ Rnmashray padhya (Age-72) Yrs nemdharl Upadhya Amnlnva'h Upadhya Age-65 Yrs W/o Ramashmy Upadhya - 7 AH are Residen'r of Snrvmangiar A‘Haohakl Dngupam Baico mgar Korba P S Balco Nagar Ker-bu P S Balco Nagar Disft Karbn (C 6) ‘ 4. Sm-r Durgesh Dwwedl Aged 36 Yrs ' W/o Bu-endm bwwedl Pmsem ksldem Jmdnl Planf Raugarh,’Dlst Rmgorh (C 6) Sm'r Priya Tiwnri, Age 28> Yrsii‘W/o Santosh Tiwarj, Residarrl‘ - PNB Bank Appiitam ; ‘ dore, Dist Inéore (M.P.) Versus Anupama Upudhya Age-28 Yrs W/o Rnkesh Upadhyn Residznf of Dagupam Balco Bnlco Nagqr Korba x Present Reildenf - BdglkharbJgmpnrn P.S.’ Bakimongm, Dist-Kor-bu (C.6.)2 ‘ 2. III-charge Polim Sfafion, Bqiaél hhgm Korbn DistKorba (6.6.) (PETHION UNDER $EC'IION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 19?3) A k .. (5a: Hon’ble Mr.T.P. $hm. I} Presem Mr- S VPurahrr wunsel far the apphcants Mr Rnendm Tripafhi Panei iuwyer‘ for 1'ha Stafe d , 5H: In h J" " g x r; i w- (I? » M1; ORDER (Passed an 28‘” August 2009) 1 The apghmnts have fded Thm petmon under Szctlon 482 of fhe Code of 1; Cmmmal Pracedure 1973 (m shor? ‘the Code') for qua¢hm9nf of cmmma' proceeding pending before The Chief Judicial Magis‘rro‘re Korba, in g ' Cmmmal) Case No 107/2007 for fha offenge punishable undcr- sad-mu: 498 A of fhe Indian Pena! Code and Sectmn 3 and 4 of fhc Dowry‘ Prohibition Ac1' 2. Learnedlcounsel for The applicanTs submiTs That F I R has been regisi'ened / _ on 'l’he basis of writ-ten compiam‘t made To ‘H’ie Chief Judicial Magisfmfe Korba‘und chore sheaf has been fi!ed againsf ihe applicams Learned counsel furi’her submifs mm comenfs of FI R and sinfamems racorded under Seé'ricm 161 of ‘rhe Code are self-conmdiciory and no? SJfficiem for- dmwing inference agomsf fhe presam applicants The applicants war: not reisiding or presen'i' of The Time of commission of 1he offence on 1h: spo‘r fherefore They are no? liable for any commission of offw-ca 3. On The oThei- hand learned counsel for The STaTe opposes The peTiTlon an submits mot wriffen compiqm‘t disoioses the offemca pumshabla under Sec‘hon 498-A of tho Indian Penal Code and Section 3 and 4 of The Downy; Prohibi'hon Aci' 4. AT The Time of exawiinaTion of The claim of The applicants for quashmenT of V __ » The criminal proceeding, The CourT below is required To see wheTher The u oilega'rion mode in The complaint/charge sheei' is admitted in ifs face vain? _ or no? and if if is admiti'ed in its face value fhen some would be sufficient for coiwic‘rion against fhe applicants 5i In The lighT of wriTTen oomplainT and charge sheeT on The basis of invesfiga‘hon showmg prima focie maferial againsf The @pliconTs I do noT find any ground in exercise of exTraordinar'y inherenT JurisdioTion in Terms V of SecTion 482 of The Code: ,6. ConsequenTly, The peTiTion is dismissed. 0 d