IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19852 of 2010 GANGA SAGAR YADAV S/O RAM BACHA YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.19853 of 2010 DAYANAND YADAV S/O SARYUG YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 01.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 414, 411 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that when one Md. Jishan Khan was arrested with an alleged stolen Lap Top and other articles, he disclosed that petitioners were receiver of stolen goods and upon his discloser, two Lap Tops from their shop were recovered. It has been submitted that the petitioners are in custody since 16.4.2010 and have no criminal antecedents. In view of such, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) each with two 2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial magistrate, Patna Junction, Patna, in connection with Patna Junction G.R.P.S. Case No. 159/2010, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners and the other bailor shall be the sister of the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not an accused in any other case and, if they are, they shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for 3 charge and if they fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (v) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fails to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)