IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR THURSDAY, THE 31ST JULY 2008 / 9TH SRAVANA 1930 CRP.No. 247 of 2003() --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 09/08/2002 IN IA.1213/2001 IN OS.20/2000 of SUB COURT, THIRUVALLA .................... PETITIONER: PETITIONER: ---------------------------------------- VARUGHESE MATHAI, BLESSON BHAVAN, MARAMON. BY ADV. SRI.PHILIP T.VARGHESE SRI.THOMAS T.VARGHESE RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS ------------------------------------------------- 1. MARIAMMA GEORGE, PARACKAMANNIL (KAVIL) CHIRAYIRAMBU. 2. KOSHY GEORGE, PARACKAMANNIL (KAVIL) CHIRAYIRAMBU. 3. MATHEW GEORGE, PARACKAMANNIL (KAVIL), CHIRAYIRAMBU 4. ALEX GEORGE, PARACKAMANNIL KAVIL CHIRAYIRAMBU. 5. MARY GEORGE, PARACKAMANNIL (KAVIL), CHIRAYIRAMBU. 6. M.C.KOSHY, POIPALLIL, NEDUMPRAYAR, MARAMON. 7. ROY MATHEW, MARUTHOLICKAL, KURIAYANNOOR 8. MATHEW P.THOMAS, MARUTHOLICKAL, KURIYANNOOR. BY ADV. SRI.SATHISH NINAN - R1,2 & 5 THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss M.Sasidharan Nambiar,J. ======================= C.R.P No.247 of 2003 ======================= Dated this the 31st day of July, 2008 O R D E R This petition is filed challenging the dismissal of an application filed by third party petitioner to implead himself as an additional plaintiff under Rule 3 of Order XXII of Code of Civil Procedure which was dismissed as per order dated 9.8.2002. The suit was subsequently dismissed. Learned counsel appearing for petitioner submitted that in view of the dismissal of the suit, the revision petition may be disposed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the dismissal of the suit by a regular appeal. Reserving that right, Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. M.Sasidharan Nambiar Judge tpl/- M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J. --------------------- CRL.R.P.NO. /08 --------------------- ORDER MARCH,2008