IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3435 of 2010 1. KUNJ BIHARI PATHAK, SON OF LATE RAM SWAROOP PATHAK, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE+P.O.: AGANUR, P.S. KALER, AT DISTRICT: ARWAL. 2. MOHIUDDIN, SON OF LATE JAMALUDDIN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE: BASATLPUR, P.O.- MANIKPUR, P.S. INDRAPURI, DISTRICT- ROHTAS. 3. KAMESHWAR SINGH NO.3, SON OF LATE BHULAN SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- DIHRI SUKHARA, P.O. THAKURAIE PARASIA, P.S. NASARIGANJ, AT DISTRICT- ROHTAS (SASARAM). 4. MAHFUZUL HUSSAIN, SON OF LATE SHER MOHAMMAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- TELADH, P.O.+P.S. AGIAWA BAZAR, AT DISTRICT- BHOJPUR. 5. BIDHYADHAR PRASAD, SON OF LATE RAMESHWAR PRASAD MATHUR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KARABAT, P.O. BADHIYA, SONHA DISTRICT- JAMUI (BIHAR). 6. MADHESHWAR PRASAD, SON OF LATE RAM NARAYAN PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BERKAP. P.O. DARIHAT, P.S. AAMAR KOTHA, DISTRICT- ROHTAS (SASARAM). 7. NIWASH SINGH SON OF LATE DHURHU SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PARASIA, P.O. PARASIA, P.S. DHANSOIE, DISTRICT- BUXAR (BIHAR). 8. SUKUWASU KUER, WIFE OF RAM BILASH BHAGAT AT RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PIPRA, P.O. MAKHARA (JAY GOBIND NAGAR, P.S. JAMHORE, DISTRICT- AURANGABAD (BIHAR) :--PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATNA THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN NAMELY, SHRI P.K.ROY. 2. THE SECRETARY, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATNA NAMELY, SHRI P.K. ROY. 3. THE ELECTRICAL EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TRANSMISSION DIVISION, DEHRI ON SONE, DISTRICT- ROHTAS (SASARAM), NAMELY, SHRI HARI NANDAN PRASAD. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TRANSMISSION DIVISION, DEHRI ON SONE, AT DISTRICT- ROHTAS (SASARAM), NAMELY, SRI A.K.SINGH. 5. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TRANSMISSION SUBDIVISION SONE NAGAR, AURANGABAD (BIHAR) NAMELY, SHRI DIPAK PRASAD :---CONTEMNORS/OPPOSITE PARTIES:-- RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 05.05.2011. From the show-cause filed on behalf of the Board it is evident that the orders of the High Court dated 27.11.2009 passed in C.W.J.C.No. 16086 of 2009, Annexure-1 has been complied 2 with. In the circumstances, there is no occasion to proceed with the contempt matter, which is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to challenge the payment made, if they are not satisfied with the quantum of the amount paid. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)