: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.85 OF 2007 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.85 OF 2007 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.85 OF 2007 IN IN IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.347 OF 2003 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.347 OF 2003 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.347 OF 2003 IN IN IN SUIT NO.408 OF 2003 SUIT NO.408 OF 2003 SUIT NO.408 OF 2003 Ramanlal Bhikaji Shah alias Mehta .. Petitioner Versus 1. Priya Naresh Athavale 2. Salim Samshi .. Original Defendant Nos.1&2. And Ibrahim Jusab Sopariwala & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Birendra Saraf i/b.Kishore Thakordas & Co. for petitioner. Ms.Baiga i/b.S.I.Memon for respondent Nos.3 and 4. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 3rd October, 2007. DATE : 3rd October, 2007. DATE : 3rd October, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: : 2 : 1. The petitioner who is the original plaintiff has already moved this Court after the subsequent developments and brought to the notice of the Court that its injunction order in the suit has been violated. The Court taking cognizance of his grievance and being prima-facie, satisfied, has appointed the Court Receiver. While doing so the Court has observed that some of the parties to the transaction were not aware of the order of injunction. 2. It is in these circumstances and when it would be necessary to go further into the transaction and probe whether the same really amounts to transfer or disposal of the suit property, this is not a fit case for exercising contempt jurisdiction. Contempt petition is not the remedy of the plaintiff and in any event he has availed of a remedy available to him in law. It will be open for him to amend the pleadings and claim such reliefs as are permissible in law. 3. Contempt petition is dismissed. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.) (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.) (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.)