IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12837 of 2007 1. PAWAN KUMAR SINGH SON OF LATE RAM BILASH SINGH 2. SUNIL SINGH, SON OF JUGAL KISHORE SINGH, BOTH RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE-NAREPUR, POLICE STATION- BACHHWARA, DISTRICT- BEGUSARAI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. BANDANA DEVI, W/O- KAMAL KANT JHA, R/O- VILLAGE ORIYAMA, P.S.- DALSINGSARAI, DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR. For the petitioners :Mr. Dr. Amrendra Kumar No 1, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ----------- 7 02.08.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioners assail the order dated 15,1,2007 passed by learned Trial Court (Addl. Sessions Judge-cum-F.T.C.-III, Samastipur) in Sessions Trial No. 697 of 2005 whereby the application preferred under Section 227 of the Cr.P.C. has been considered and rejected. While assailing the sustainability of the order, it is submitted that there is no legal material against the petitioners justifying order framing the charge. Learned counsel for the petitioners draws attention of the court to the statement of the victim girl recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C.. It is submitted that she has named host of persons in the commission of a crime but the names of the petitioners do not figure therein. From the statement of the girl, it is very much clear that she is a minor. She has alleged that the accused persons and few others had hands in her kidnapping. The impugned order indicates that the learned trial court, on perusal of the case diary 2 and the statement of the witnesses recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C., has come to the conclusion that there is material justifying proceeding with the trial. There is no merit in this application. It is accordingly dismissed. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )