IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:- THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST MAY 2008 / 31ST VAISAKHA 1930 S.T.Rev.No.342 of 2003 ----------------------------------------------- (AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 3.6.2002 IN T.A.NO.1257 OF 1999 OF THE KERALA SALES TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ADDITIONAL BENCH, ERNAKULAM (ASSESSMENT YEAR 1996-97) .................... PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ASSESSEE:- ------------------------------------------------------ NELSON DANIEL, PROPRIETOR, G.B.CORPORATION, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, COCHIN-36. BY ADV. SRI.PAULY MATHEW MURICKEN SRI.A.NANDAKUMAR RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/REVENUE:- ----------------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MUHAMMED RAFIQ. THIS SALES TAX REVISION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:- H.L.Dattu,C.J. & M.C.Hari Rani,J. ---------------------------------------------- S.T.Rev.No.342 of 2003 --------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 21st day of May, 2008 ORDER H.L.Dattu,C.J. This revision arises out of an order passed by the Kerala Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Additional Bench, Ernakulam in T.A.No.1257 of 1999 dated 3.6.2002, pertaining to the assessment year 1996-97. 2. After arguing the matter for quite some time, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the Sales Tax Revision without prejudice to all the contentions canvassed in this revision before the appropriate forum in appropriate proceedings. 3. Permission sought for is granted and the Sales Tax Revision is disposed of as withdrawn without prejudice to all the contentions canvassed by the petitioner's learned counsel in this revision before the appropriate forum in appropriate proceedings. 4. I.A.No.2559 of 2003 is dismissed. 5. In view of the orders passed in the revision petition, the reliefs sought in I.A.Nos.662 of 2004, 1391 of 2007 and 1060 of 2008 need not be considered by this Court. Accordingly, the said applications are rejected. Ordered accordingly. H.L.Dattu Chief Justice M.C.Hari Rani Judge vku/-