IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18892 of 2011 ANIL KUMAR YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 16.06.2011. Heard. Regard being had to the fact that the Thela Vendor, Domi Sah has repeatedly named the petitioner as one of the persons who had forcibly taken out the kerosene oil from his drum and some part of which was recovered from one of the accused persons, the court is not inclined to direct the release of the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Petition is dismissed. After the court had dictated the above order, Sri Shekhar Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner started arguing and tried to dictate the terms with court for passing a particular order. Sri Singh is directed to file a show cause as to why an appropriate contempt proceeding be not initiated for the misconduct shown in the court room and referred to the appropriate Bench. As this stage Sri Singh rose again to express his profound apology, which is accepted and the proceeding is dropped with a warning to him to be cautious in future. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha,J.)