IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-27639 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.9.2011 Ali Mohammad and another ….Petitioners Versus M/s BTL Investment Ltd. and another …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. H.S. Rakhra, Advocate for the petitioners. NAWAB SINGH, J. (ORAL) A complaint titled `M/s BTL Investments Ltd. Vs. Ali Mohd. and another’ (Annexure P1) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Faridabad. During the pendency of the complaint, matter was amicably settled by the parties as finds mention in Annexure P2. Complainant filed application (Annexure P4) before the trial Court to allow him to withdraw the complaint. Trial Magistrate, vide order dated April 21st, 2011 (Annexure P6), dismissed the complaint as withdrawn. Petitioner was declared proclaimed offender, vide order dated February 25th, 2011 (Annexure P3). Against the said order, petitioner filed revision before the Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad (Annexure P5). Learned counsel for the petitioners confines his submission to the contention that Revisional Court should be directed to dispose of the revision at the earliest or decide the application to stay the impugned order of the Magistrate, whereby petitioner was declared proclaimed offender. Submission being convincing, Revisional Court is directed to pre- pone the revision in view of the facts given hereinabove and decide the revision or the stay application within seven days from the date of receipt of this order. Disposed accordingly. (NAWAB SINGH) JUDGE 12.09.2011 Ishwar