IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 4TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 13TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 29422 of 2011(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SAVITHRI, AGED 74 YEARS,W/O.PADMANABHAN, KOCHUVILAYIL HOUSE,UMBERNADU MURI,THEKKEKKARA VILLAGE,ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.RENJITHKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHENGANNOOR-686001. 2. SAHADEVAN,S/O.VELUTHAKUNJU, AGED 45 YEARS,SANTHOSH BHAVANAM,UMBERNADU MURI, THEKKEKKARA VILLAGE,ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688002. SR GP M.J.RAJASHREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 29422 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY TH PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT ON 28/7/2011 EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 26/9/2011 ISSUED BY IST RESPONDENT ADDRESSING TO THE PETITIONER'S SON. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER ON 12/10/2011 EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT (UNDATED) (True copy) P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).29422/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 4th day of November, 2011 JUDGMENT The only prayer sought for in this writ petition is a direction to the first respondent to consider Ext.P1 application made by the petitioner for cutting and removing certain trees in the property of the second respondent. Taking note of the case of the petitioner regarding the pendency of the application, without expressing anything on the merits, I dispose of this writ petition directing the first respondent to consider Ext.P1 application in accordance with law and pass orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. It is directed that before orders are passed, the second respondent should be given an opportunity of hearing. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs