THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.23046 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner claims to have made a representation dated 08.04.2011 to the 3rd respondent, with certain claims. His grievance is that no orders have been passed thereon. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. A perusal of the representation, dated 08.04.2011, discloses that the petitioner is not clear as to what exactly he wants the 3rd respondent to do. On the one hand, appointment as ‘substitute’ in Group-D, as prayed for, and on the other hand, consideration for making certain suggestions for financial savings; is claimed. Be that as it may, the petitioner can further elaborate upon the representation. The 3rd respondent can be required to act upon the representation within the reasonable time. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the 3rd respondent to take necessary steps on the representation made by the petitioner within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If any, further clarification, or elaboration is needed, it shall be open to the 3rd respondent to require the petitioner to do so. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Dt:16.08.2011 GJ