HIGH COTOR.T OF CHHATIWCyMaB. BIIASWm Writ Petttlon (81 No. 4377 of 2007 PBTITIONBR RE8POKDEMTS Balraxu, aged aboat 59'years, Son of Late Shri Duldikhu, Residcnt of KachcM Daiai, Chumiri CoHieaiy, Dfatrict Korea (C.&.) Versus 1 State of Chliattisgarh, Thiou^i- Secretaxy, Departnaent of School Education, Mantcalaya, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur(C.G.) 2 Thc District Education Officer, Korea, Distefct Korea (C.G.) 3 President, Maaagement Cdmniittee tfarough Prmcipal, Chinain Collieaiy Vidyalaya, Chimriri, Distnct KQrea (C.O.) 4 The Director, Directoxate, Pubfic Institution, Pensioa Bada, Raipar, (C.G.) ApBearance: Shri R.K. Jaiswd, couttselfor fhe petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Pancl Lawyer for the State oa advance copy. ORALOia^t (01.08.2007) SUmL KUMAR SIBHA. J. Heard on admissioii. The pctitioner is claiaung the benefits of ncoimac of 5th Pay CQntmission at par with the couater part in (hc Govemnient Institution, It is submitted fhat the benefits of5*h Pay Coinaussion was to be graated wifh efflect fi-oin l.1.1996 te accordance wlth the Madhya Pradcsh Revislon of Pay Rutes, 1998. Leamed couasel for tfac petitioner siibmits that ia the inatter of Sint. A. Lall Vs. State of Chhattisgarh aad ofhcr connected matters (W.P. No. 4108 of 2005), this Court h held «, that fhe teachers worlm^ in the Govemmcnt Aided S<AooIs are cntifled to the benefit of recoimnendation of the 5A Pay Conmussion. He also subinits that the same logic woirid be applicable in case ofPeon. W.P.(S) No. 4377 of 2007 Leamed couasel for the pctitioner subnrits that fhis petitton may be disposed of wifli. a Mberty to fh.e petittoaer to inake represcxitatton before thc concemed aufhorities and the said aufhiorities may be directed to cousider fhe representati<Mi as has been ordcred ia many cases. Accordingfy, tius petition is disposed of with a <Ur«;tion that If so advised, the petitioner niay fite represeatatioa befi>re the concemed authorities •wifhin a period of 13 days feova. today along with copy of this order and copy of writ petitioa euad Ae ordcr passed in the matter of Smt. A. LaU Vs. State of Chhattisgarh aud ofhcr coxinected inatters (Supra^ a&d if such a representation is ffied fhat shall be decided on its own xaertt ia accordance wifh law by fhe conccmed authoritics. The pctition is accoidiugfy disposed of. No cuders as to costs. — -— Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge vatU