IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.636 of 2010 1. MADAN RAJAK S/O LATE DAROGA RAM S/O LATE DEO LAL RAM R/O VILL- KHAIRA, PO- USARI, P.S- MAHANDIA, DISTT- ARWAL 2. NARESH KUMAR S/O LATE DAROGA RAM, S/O LATE DEO LAL RAM R/O VILL- KHAIRA, PO- USARI, P.S- MAHANDIA, DISTT- ARWAL Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SMT. POLKA SAHNI THE COLLECTOR, JEHANABAD 2. SRI DAYASHANKAR PANDEY COLLECTOR, ARWAL, DISTT- ARWAL 3. SRI MADAN MOHAN PRASAD, THE DIRECTOR, GENERAL PROVIDENT FUND PANT BHWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 4. SRI JITENDRA KUMAR SINGH THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICE, JEHANABAD 5. SRI SANDEEP KUMAR THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, KARPI, ARWAL ----------- 4 07.07.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. A show cause has been filed on behalf of the opposite party no.4. It is submitted that the order of the Court has been complied with, with regard to payment of provident fund dues and the necessary documents have been annexed as Annexure-A & B (series) to the show cause. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the calculation needs to be verified. Be that as it may, since the order of the Court has been complied with, this contempt application need not proceed further and the same is accordingly dismissed. However, it will be open for the petitioner to bring to the notice of the concerned respondents with regard to any discrepancy in calculation within a period of four weeks. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)