31, / HIGH COURT OF-CHHATTISGARH; BILASPUR Writ Petition iS} NO; 2857 of 2007 1) Laxman Sai Samdoor, aged about 43 years, son of Shri’ Kapil Sai, Lower' Division Teacher; Midd.e Schoo! Keys-ah Pos’: Office Kersai, Vikas Khand Pharsabahar, 'Tahsil Kunkuri, Distt. Jashpur (CG) (Sl.no;350 orcier dt.8.’i 0.86 nnexure PM). Nirmaia Minj, D/o. Justa Min}, aged about 44 years, Assistant Teacher, Government (Tribai ) Primary Schooi — Bardand Tah. Kunkuri; ‘v'ikas Ki’iand Kunkuri, Dist. Jashpur,‘ CG.(Abstra‘ct copy of servio ’ book is Ann'exure P-2). SteHa Ekka, aged about 42 years, daughter of ‘Tarsisiyus 'Ekka, Assistarit Teacher, Government .Tribai Primafy Schooi — Khaa’se, Tah, Kunkud, Dist. Jashpur, CG. (Abstract copy service beck is Annexure P-3).r Amiavati Kispotta, aged about 43 yeare, daughter of Edwart Kispotta,’ Assistant Teacher, Gavernment Triba! Giri Primary Schooi Rajauti,’ Kunkuri, Distt. Jashpur, (CG). (Abstract copy of service bock isAnnexure P'- 4). Petitiers ' on Versus 1.). State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Tribal, Dau‘ kaiian Sing Bhawan.,Raipur, CG. Asst. Commissioner, Department of Tribai Welfar ,Jashpur, Dist. Jashpur, CGRaigarh, Distt. Raigarh, CG, Resp‘ondems ., A e h e (Writ Petition under Artic!e 226 of the Constitution of India) (SB: Hcn'ble Shti Justice Satish K. Agnihotri) PRESENT: Shri Kunal Das, Advocate appears on behaif of Shri Amit Kumar Sharma, counsel for the petmoner. ‘Shri VR. Tiwari, Pane! Lawyer for respohdents/State. GRDER V (Passed on 9‘“, May, 2007) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner as well as for the Statelrespondents jointiy submit that the facts and question of iaw invoived in the present writ petition are the same to that of in Writ Petition (S) No. 4725 of 2006‘(Amar Sai Ram and others. Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & others), which was disposed of vide order dated_1-9-2006. Leamed counsei appearing forthe parties further submit that this matter be disposed of in the same‘terms. In View of the, above stated submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ'petition is disposed of in the same terms. No order as to Costs. mfg? i Satish K. Agnihot'ri 1 i l Judge i.