CD ^»1t ?3^ i^^-r?^i Ct' IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.} Contempt Petitien No. ......;1-.^J....... 2010 (L^lS-LtL^ Petitioners ^v^ ^.y^ 2. ^-•^: ..^\^"\^ &S-; ^f' ..-.1. ^" <--af 7. Chetan Kumar Yadav S/o Krishna Kumar Yadav.age 45 yrs. Asstt. Teaeher, Govt. Primary School, Budhapara, Balod, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Pawan Kumar Yadav S/o Chhabilal Yadav, age 45 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Budhapara, Balod, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Rikhi Ram Thakur S/o Ajab Singh, Thakur, age 45 years, Assistant Teacher, GovtPrimary School, Taroud Distt. Durg (C.G.) Jairam Sonwani S/o Ganesh Ram Sonwani, age 49 yrs. Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Budrupara, Balod, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Nandkishore YadavS/o Shukel Ram Yadav, age 45 yrs, Assistant Teacher, Middle School, Newarikala, Balod, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Bhag Singh Som S/o Tularam Som, age 44 yrs. Assistant Teacher, Middle School, Latabod, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Pannalal Sahu S/o Ali Ram Sahu, Age 49 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt.Girls PrimarySchool No.1, Balod, Distt. Durg (C.G.) '2- 8. Smt. Chandrakanth Rawate W/o Ashok Kumar Rawte, age41 yrs Assistant Teacher, Middle School, Parsoda, Balod, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 9. Jagram Sahu, age 51 yrs., S/o Balmukund Sahu, Asstt.Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Aroud, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 2aan <'-,)."-10 10. Komal ^ingJ^Sahu, 45 years, s/o /|^Ti (^^ Asstt. Teache^ ^ -——— ^ Govt. 'EumaOSchool, Biretara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 11. Sanjay Kumar Martin S/o G. Martin, age 37 yrs. Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Badgaon, Doundi Lohara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Contemnors VERSUS 1. Shri R.P. Mandal, Secretary, School Education Department, Ministry, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Shri B.L. Kurrey, District Education Officer, Durg (C.G.) Contempt apDlication u/s 12 of the Contempt ofCourt Act i_hen aj- rncSi^ XI-HC-22 an^f^ir R-fi.+ svS^v **<!•* ^rffg Praveen -ysi "t|i-i|id4, riT)l'y'iii. fa<ni«y SIT^T trsra? ^..(1?;?.A:..C?^..£^6^ c WlCfT gilirai f^d'^sr' 311^1 TCIIwnfSd SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindrla Mohan Shrivastava, J 25.01.2011 Mr. Somkant Verma, Ms. Pushpa Dwivedi, coiunsel colunsel Learned counsel for compliance of the order passi W.P. (S) No. 1102/09, the res the representation of the 29.7.2010 and, therefore, press the contempt petition. take recourse to appropriate the petitioner under the 29.7.2010. the tHe «hl^[c(<il-1 ^MvS -9 fs^S <fa-(^l< ^? aipgil sn^l for the petitioner. for the respondents. petitioner submits that in |d by this Court on 5.1.2010 in s^ondents authority ha.ve decided petitioner vide order dated petitioner does not wish to He, however, seeks liberty to [reinedy as may be available to \aw against fhe order dated Not opposed. Accordingly, rule is discfharged. Consequentiy, the pejtition is finally disppsed off reserving liberty as prayed fo4 Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge L