IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 4TH MARCH 2011 / 13TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 6689 of 2011(I) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- C.ASHA, W/O.LATE DR.MONI, AGED 45 YEARS, NARAYANA HOUSE, ASRAMOM, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.R.SATHISH KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVT.DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001 2. CORPORATION OF KOLLAM, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, KOLLAM- 691 001 3. THE SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF KOLLAM, KOLLAM- 691 001 4. NOUSHAD, A-AA FANCY, DR.NAIR HOSPITAL JUNCTION, ASRAMOM, KOLLAM- 691 002 R1 BY GOVT. PLEADRE SMT. K.K. DEEPA R2 & R3 BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI. M.K. CHANDRAMOHAN DAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: SMT C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C).No. 6689/2011 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th March, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner who is the landlord in respect of Shop Room no. KC/VII/1226/66D of Corporation of Kollam filed this writ petition on being aggrieved by the delay in the matter of disposal of Ext. P3 representation. Ext. P3 representation has been submitted with a request to take appropriate action to remove the unauthorized construction effected in front of the aforementioned building by the fourth respondent, the tenant of the said shop. Admittedly, Ext. P3 representation is still pending before the third respondent. In view of the order, I propose to pass in this writ petition, I do not thing it necessary to issue notice to the fourth respondent at this stage. As noticed hereinbefore Ext. P3 is pending before the third respondent and the third respondent is competent to look into the grievances raised in Ext. P3. In the said circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the third respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P3 in accordance with law expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment with notice to the petitioner as also to the fourth respondent. C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE smt