IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 6395 of 1992 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- MANOJBHAI M GOHIL Versus KHEDA DIST PANCHAYAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR DIPAK C. RAVAL for MR MR ANAND for Petitioner No. 1-2 MR ND NANAVATI for Respondent No. 1,3 MR R.M. CHAUHAN, AGP, for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Date of decision: 15/11/2003 ORAL JUDGEMENT Mr. Dipak C. Raval, learned advocate who appears for Mr. M.R. Anand, learned counsel for the petitioners, states that though three intimations were sent to the petitioners, there is no response from them. It appears that interim relief was granted restraining the respondent authorities from enrolling any candidate for the multi purpose health workers course commencing in August/September 1992, except after holding the selection on merits pursuant to the advertisement at Annexure-A. In the circumstances, the petition seems to have become infructuous. The petition is, therefore, accordingly disposed of. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Liberty to apply in case of difficulty. [M.C. PATEL, J.] *ar*