''S'.S'-BSifr* R' ^^j£^ ^ sn^r vt R'ti'* ^Sff STT^T 9l>*tict) ^' wwni (h*ii<!h 3Sf"41-Mld'LI,,W^l*f<IS^RK?ll'M1<.; ^^..^^..^o^g.S^ppl) Sd^I'q^C'qqfF^1) ^IW yt^a <Mt^l PETITIONER: R.K Sort Doitdi, District Durg. Verbus RESPONDENTS: Stat Sed Minl 2. 3. 4. 5. D.K Chii Datjndi, District Durg, C.G. Elec Stai Thr. Raii s.. Shri Somkant Verma, Shri P.K. Bhaduri, P; and 2. Heard. • • Thls petition is directs 1st October, 2008 wherebyl -^nEiineer in Janoad Pahchavat t»ii<ift'i<il-< *<Wcff ^f ft'et <F'i((i< ^ajfimOT^I .' Sonwani, aged 55 yearsrS/o Shri C.L. s/ani, Sub Engineer, Janpad Panchayat, 3 Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through: The •etary, Panchayat S Gramin Vikash Vibhag, stry, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(CG) •etary, Jaisansadhan Vibhag Ministry, S. Bhavan, Raipur CG. 'f Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, tion Commission oflndia, New Delhi. s Eiectson Commission Chhattisaarh, ugh Commissioner, D.K.S. Bhavan, M/rit Petition under Atticle 226 of the Constitution of India) ^unsel for the petltloner. |ei Lawyer for the State/respondents No.1 ieA against the order of Annexure-P/1 dated ths petitioner, who is working as Sub Dnnrii nietrir't , QurE!; has-...feeeR- .^-•^ BS -^] "<, '*»> ^^^'^. ^ 'jil-i^ .} ' 3{&H(S-A7S -g-5^ Tqpn^pf, ^ftWlS,; fct7ll*l1< 'WHtll CT>*11cn 3n^T'q^?(''@f3^I) qiHferihtiiti?if if ft'st ^fSR?iT i?3fflpT3ii^r ;~ transferred and posted und^r the Pradhan Mantrl Gramm Sadak Yojna, Bemetara. Learned counset for |the petitionersubmitted that the order of ^been passed d|uring ban period in violation of the transfer .policy^ftjh^ State Governn| Iriister, which is| during ban period. He furth lent of Annexure-P/4 without permission of a condition precedent for effecting transfer ^r submitted that he has already submitted representation, Annexure-P/^, dated 28-7-2008, butno order has been passed on his reprasentationt He further submitted that this petition may be dis.posed,,,of with-a dir^ction to the respondents to consider his representation and decide th^ same expeditiously. .earned counsel for th^ State submitted that he has'no obiectjon !f the petition isdisposed ofwitl i the aforesaid direction. in view of the submi^sions made by learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is|disp6sed ofwith libertytothe petitionerto fite fresh representation agitinst the transfer order of Anenxure-P/1 detailing a!l his grievancss.w|hich are raised in this writ petitiQn before respondent No.1. On such r^presentation being made bythe petitioner, the same shai! be consider^d and decided by respondent No.1, in accordance with !aw, on its o^n merits, expeditiously preferabiy within a p'eriod of 8 weeks from the da1|e of receipt ofthe representation. .Sd/-...,^.^ ^liB ^Q^^^ a sa ;1 B1^ '• la