IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 1ST OCTOBER 2010 / 9TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 30203 of 2010(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MOJI.U.P., S/O.UTHAMAN,NANDANAM, VADAKKU KOCHU MURI, GOVINDAMUTTOM P.O,, KAYAMKULAM-690 527. BY ADV. SRI.T.R.JAGADEESH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETRIAT, THIRUVANANTHPAURAM. 2. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNENT DEPARTMENT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER (SDM), CHENGANNUR. 5. THE DEVIKULANGARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEVIKULANGARA, PUTHUPPALLY, KAYAMKULAM-690 527. 6. N.RAMACHANDRAN, CHANDRA BHAVAN, PUTHUPPALLY VILLAGE, GOVINDAMUTTOM P.O., KAYAMKULAM-690 527. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P. NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.30203 OF 2010(A) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the Ist day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T Prayer sought in this writ petition is a direction for consideration of Exts.P2 and P13, which are pending before respondents 4 and 5. The issue is in relation to a road. It would appear that there were serious disputes between the 6th respondent, the Panchayat and the local people concerning the right over the road in question, which have concluded by various judgments of the civil court and judgment of this court and ultimately the rights have been settled in favour of the 6th respondent. A direction to consider the aforesaid exhibits will have a direct impact on the concluded orders passed in the aforesaid proceedings. Such an indirect method to reopen and nullify such judicial orders which have become final is impermissible. It may be true that petitioner is not a party to the proceedings. Even then, this court cannot nullify the judgment and orders passed by various courts by directing consideration of Exts.P2 and P13. Therefore I am not pursued to issue a direction as sought for. Writ Petition fails and is dismissed. vi (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE WPC.No. /09 :2 :