IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Ist Bail Application No.814 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Ashish Nautiyal S/o Bhagwati Prasad Nautiyal R/o Village Bhigun, Vinkhal, Tehsil Ghansali District Tehri Garhwal ..….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …….Opposite party Dated: September 1, 2010 __________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No.263 of 2010 Under Sections 306, 504 and 506 of IPC P.S. Ukhimath, District Rudraprayag ________________________________________________________________ Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the alleged incident was said to have taken place on 12.4.2010, however, the FIR was lodged on 21.5.2010 and the delay in lodging the FIR has not been explained by giving a sufficient cause. He further argued that in the FIR there is no allegation of abatement against the applicant that he instigated or threatened the victim to commit suicide. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after going through the papers on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Ashish Nauityal be released on bail on his executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Rudraprayag. The bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 1.9.2010 RG