IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 120 OF 2001. PETITION NO. 120 OF 2001. PETITION NO. 120 OF 2001. Saatchi & Saatchi Ltd. & Anr. ... Petitioner V/s. Union of India & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Shyam Mehta i/b. Federal & Rashmikant for the petitioner. Ms. Anamica Malhotra for respondent No.1. Mr. Prashant Ghelani i/b. Mark & Gandhi & Co. for respondent No. 5. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 13th December, 2006 : 13th December, 2006 : 13th December, 2006 P.C. . The petitioner, licensee of the premises challenges notice dated 17th November, 2000 under the provisions of Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971. It appears that in respect of the same premises, another notice was issued to Durga Trading Co. who claimed to be owner of the premises. The learned Bench of this Court by order dated 6th February,2003 in Writ Petition No.1552 of 2000 was pleased to allow the petition by quashing the said notice. National Textiles Corp. Ltd., the respondent has preferred SLP before the Apex Court, which has been admitted. Considering the judgment of this Court in Writ Petition No.1552 of 2000 dated 6th ( 2 ) February, 2003, the present petition will have to be allowed. However, that would be subject to the judgment of the Supreme Court in SLP (Civil) No.12479/2003. Rule made absolute subject to the above condition. There shall be no order as to costs. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]