Civil Revision No. 1001 of 2010 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1001 of 2010 Date of decision: 27.4.2010 M/s Jagdambay Fruit Company and others ...Petitioner Versus Surjit Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. G.S.Jaswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Chadha, Advocate for the respondent. S.D.ANAND, J. The petitioners-tenants having tasted defeat at the hands of the learned Rent Controller, filed the present petition to resist the ejectment from the tenanted premises. At the time of motion hearing, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner – tenant informed the Court that he had a feeling that the parties may able to come to terms in case both are enabled to be face to face in the Court. Learned counsel also pointed out that petitioner is placed in a very peculiar circumstances inasmuch as he had a daughter of marriageable age at a time when he faces imminent eviction from the premises aforementioned. On consensual basis, it is ordered that petition shall stand dismissed as withdrawn. However, petitioner-tenant shall vacate the premises by or on 30.6.2011. The petitioners shall file an undertaking to the above effect within fifteen from today before the Civil Revision No. 1001 of 2010 -2- **** Registry of this Court. In case of a default, the petitioners-tenants shall be liable to eviction forthwith from the premises aforementioned. Further, the petitioner-tenant shall clear the arrears of rent within three months from today and also keep on paying rent regularly. A civil Misc. Application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner-tenant whereby a direction for time-bound disposal of an ejectment petition (filed by the petitioner-tenant against a non- petitioner who is in possession of certain premises owned by the former). The learned counsel for the petitioner states that if the requested direction is granted, it would facilitate the eviction of the tenanted premises by him. He is otherwise conscious of the fact that tenant in occupation of the premises owned by him is not a party before this Court. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner may present a copy of this order before the learned Rent Controller who is trying the ejectment petition filed by him. This Court would expect that the learned Rent Controller would expedite conclusion of the trial. Even otherwise, the learned Rent Controllers are under a direction on the judicial side to dispose of personal necessity matters on priority basis. Disposed of accordingly. April 27, 2010 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge