IN THE HIGH_CqURT OF MADHYft PRADESH AT JfiBALPUI U.P.NO.^,<?jn' OF 1995 py .!> r t.c s-s^7 RESPONDENTS '^h. /-• "* fr- '"-'^ ^ '/' €^-^^'^~iA PETITIONER ; R.P.SfiHU son ot Shri Kejuram Sahu, aged _ ^ &_ years, .Lecturer^ Daji Marathi Higher Sec. School.DhaBstari Resident at Dhamtari Tahsil Dhamtari Distt. Raipur M.P. VERSUS 1.^-THE EDUCfiTION COMMI8SIONER AND DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS. Madhya Pradesh. Bhopal 2.\"^ THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC IhBTRUCTIONS, Raipur vision, Raipur. 3.\ THE GOVERNMENT OF MADHYA PRADESH, School Education Department through Educatian Secretary, Bhopal 4. DfiJI MftRATHI SIKSHfiN SAMITI, Dhamtari• PETITION UNDER fiRT. 2S6/S37 OF THE_ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE URIT. OR ORRER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE^ OF_A URIT ETC. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURB CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR 8inj?e Beach: Hoa'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. W. P. No. 3911 OF 199S Petitioner Respondents Versus R.P. Sahu The Educatiou Conuiussioner ofhers None for the petitioner. Shri Suiul Otwani, Panel lawyer for fhe respondent No. 1 to3. Noae for the respondent No. 4. ORAL ORDER (6th March, 2006) 1. The inatter was caUed for hearing twice. On both occasious, none appeared nor any representation was made on behalfofthe petitkuier. 2. Accordiugly, the writ pctition is disinissed for waat of prosecution. Sdf- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge