IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17246 of 2010 1. SIKANDAR YADAV 2. Birju Yadav 3. Happy Yadav Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 14.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Considering the nature of allegations under Sections 323, 504, 506/34, 379/34 of the Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3(1)(v)(x) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, this Court is not persuaded to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail. The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioners is required to be considered in like manner as that of co-accused Kali Yadav, with common allegation, granted bail in Cr. Misc. No. 11491 of 2010, without being prejudiced by the present order. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)