1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4190 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.6094 OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra ...APPLICANT. VERSUS Babu s/o Dagadu More ...RESPONDENT. ... Mr.V.D. Rakh, A.G.P. for Applicants. ... WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4191 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.6144 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4192 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.6141 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4193 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.6138 OF 2009 CORAM: K.U. CHANDWAL, J. DATE : 19TH DECEMBER, 2009. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned A.G.P. There is delay of 800 days 2 in causing to file respective Appeals, it is sought to be condoned. Having gone through the details of the Application, I find that though the Judgment is dated 25/4/2006, the prompt action as was expected is not taken. Even the court fee was not made available for preferring the Appeals. The delay being not sufficiently and properly explained cannot be condoned. 2. The learned A.G.P. also referred to the findings of the learned Reference Court. I have gone through the award under challenge. No infirmity could be seen in the appreciation of the sale instances and the evidence. The respective Applications and the Appeals are dismissed. Necessary Court Fee be refunded. [K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.] asb/DEC09/ca4190.09