IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.2725 of 2010 1. DUKHAN MEHTA @ DUKHAN MAHTO son of late Janki Mahato, 2. Tapeshwari Devi w/o Dukhan Mahto, & 3. pramod Mehta s/o Dukhan Mehta, All resident of village- Dadhapa (Dakshin Bigha), P.O.Amba, P.S. Kutumba, District- Aurangabad, ….Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR & 2. Lalti Devi D/o Sitaram Mahato, R/o Mirjapur, P.S. Kutumba, District- Aurangabad …Opposite Parties ----------- 2/ 26.08.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioners have sought quashing of the order of cognizance dated 4.7.2009 passed in Compliant Case No.306 of 2009 by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, for the offence under section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner submits that 12 months after the marriage when the opposite party no.2 complained of stomachache she was taken to the doctor and was found pregnant from even before the date of marriage and, therefore, she was taken back by her father. Thereafter, the present complaint has been filed with false and frivolous allegations. I am of the view that the impugned order calls for no interference for this reason. The application is dismissed. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)