BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Fourteenth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.14496 of 2011 S. NAINAR ... PETITIONER/4TH ACCUSED Vs STAET REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KALLIDAIKURICHI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT CRIME NO. 364/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. V.ANGUSAMY Advocate For Respondent : Mr.S.DURAI PANDIAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Section 366(A) I.P.C. in Crime No.364 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.Heard Mr.V.Angusamy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent State. 3.According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the victim girl was aged about 18 years and she had eloped with A1 and the petitioner has nothing to do with the alleged offence and subsequenlty, the victim girl along with the first accused was secured to the police and she is restored to her parents. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioner, who is arrayed as second accused, has nothing to say about the elopement of the victim girl with the first accused. He would further submit that the third accused, who is also in the same footing with the petitioner herein, was granted anticipatory bail by this COurt on 08.11.2011 in Crl.O.P(MD)No.14001/2011 and therefore, the petitioner may also be granted with anticipatory bail. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent would submit in his argument that the third accused was granted anticipatory bail by this Court and similar conditions may be imposed, if for any reason, this Court has come to the conclusion that the petitioner may be granted anticipatory bail. 5.Considering the submissions of both sides, I could see that the third accused was granted anticipatory bail by this Court on an earlier occasion dated 08.11.2011 in Crl.OP(MD) No.14001/2011 and the petitioner herein, being the second accused, is also in the same footing and therefore, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ambasamudram and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.c. Scrupulously. 7.THe petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 14/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AMBASAMUDRAM 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KALLIDAIKURICHI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S. V.ANGUSAMY Advocate SR.No.39479 rl/6c – 16.11.2011 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14496 of 2011 Date :14/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/