IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2438 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Ravi Shankar Ojha S/O Bhirgunath Ojha Village Maghrakh, P.S. Mashrakh, District Saran At Chapra. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Regional Dy. Director of Education, Sran Division, Chapra. 4. The Distt. Education Officer/Distt. Supdt. Of Education, Saran At Chapra. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gyan Shankar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rajesh Singh Gp16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 6 01-11-2017 The petitioner, in the present writ application has sought for direction upon the respondents for quashing the order contained in Memo No.1462 dated 30.12.2010, issued by the Deputy Director of Education, Saran Division, Chapra, by which, the services of the petitioner has been terminated after nineteen years of his appointment, in the light of the general order passed in CWJC No.8942 of 2001 (Bhagwan Singh Vs. State of Others), in which, the petitioner was not a party. It is further prayed that after quashing the termination order, respondents be directed to allow the petitioner to continue in service, with all consequential benefits, pursuant to his selection and appointment, dated 31.01.1991. Patna High Court CWJC No.2438 of 2011 (6) dt.01-11-2017 2/2 It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the orders passed in CWJC No.5345 of 2016. The contention made on behalf of the petitioner has not been opposed by the learned counsel for the State. Noticing the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ application stands disposed of in light of the order passed in CWJC No.5345 of 2016 dated 22.05.2017. The respondents are directed to examine the case of the petitioner and if the case of the petitioner is found identical to that of CWJC No.5345 of 2016 dated 22.05.2017, then the respondents shall grant the necessary benefit to the petitioner as per Clause-4.C (1) of the State Litigation Policy, within a period of three months from the date of production of copy of this order. With the aforesaid directions and observations, the present writ application stands disposed of. Amit/- (Sudhir Singh, J) U