1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.148 OF 2010 (Narayanrao Ramchandra Kakad vs. State and others) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : S.A.BOBDE AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 18, 2010 Heard Shri Patil, learned Counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner has challenged acquisition of his land on the ground that the respondent Land Acquisition Officer has not considered the objection raised by the petitioner in terms of the Government Resolution. According to the petitioner, his land had already been acquired and the Government Resolution states that as far as possible such person's land should not be acquired again. It, however, appears that the Land 2 Acquisition Officer has overruled the objection and acquired the petitioner's land for re-settlement without considering his objection. It is, however, fairly accepted by Shri Patil, learned Counsel for the petitioner, that land of the petitioner has already been acquired and possession of land has also been taken. In this view of the matter, we are not inclined to entertain the petition. Shri Patil, learned Counsel for the petitioner, has further expressed an apprehension that land of the petitioner is likely to be acquired again. The apprehension is premature. We are not inclined to entertain the petition. The petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE khj