{1} wp825109.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.8251 OF 2009 Kishan s/o Pandurang Bhalerao Petitioner Versus The Collector, Collector Office, Hingoli & others Respondents Mr.H.I.Pathan, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.K.Kadam, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2. Mr.V.M.Lomte, advocate for Respondent No.3. Respondent No.4 served. Mr.S.R.Bagal, advocate for Respondent No.5. CORAM : N.H.PATIL AND T.V.NALAWADE, JJ. DATE : 17th August, 2011 PER COURT: 1 Heard learned Counsel for respective parties. 2 The petitioner challenges entries made in the revenue record in the proceedings of writ petition. 3 Considering the record and facts of the case, we are not inclined to entertain the writ petition. The petitioner raises disputed questions of facts. The matter relates to right to {2} wp825109.odt immovable properties. This issue cannot be gone in writ jurisdiction. The petition is misconceived. 4 Writ Petition stands dismissed. We have not expressed any opinion on merits of the claim of either of the parties. T.V.NALAWADE N.H.PATIL JUDGE JUDGE ******* adb/wp825109