BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Sixth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.PALANIVELU CRL OP(MD) No.12794 of 2011 1 SANKAR 2 APPAKUTTI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 2 & 3 Vs THE STATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE KADAYAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DT CR NO. 219/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. G.THALAIMUTHURASU Advocate For Respondent : M/S. A.RAMAR, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 417, 420 and 506(ii) I.P.C. in Crime No.219 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that even though the petitioners have already been enlarged on bail by this Court, due to a road accident, they were not able to surrender before the Court for executing the sureties and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3. Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent State. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that even though the petitioners have already been enlarged on bail, due to a road accident, they were not able to surrender before the Court for executing the sureties, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ambasamudram and on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. unti further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, falling which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 26/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE AMBASAMUDRAM 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KADAYAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DT +1. CC to M/S. G.THALAIMUTHURASU Advocate SR.No.33264 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12794 of 2011 Date :26/09/2011 SMA/28.9.2011/6C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/