IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1421 OF 2009 Nandkumar Ramling Swami & Ors. ...Petitioners V/s. Shantling Nandkumar Swami & Anr. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Prashant Bhavake i/b Mr.Narendra V.Bandiwadekar for Petitioners. None for Respondents. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. FEBRUARY 12, 2009. FEBRUARY 12, 2009. FEBRUARY 12, 2009. P.C. 1. No fault can be found with the view taken by the Court below that the steps taken by the parties did not provide for sufficient safeguard commensurate with the minor’s interest in the property which is subject matter of the Suit. 2. The argument of the Petitioners that on the same day, the lower Court has passed contradictory orders is preposterous. It is the : 2 : Petitioners who invited the Court to pass orders on separate applications filed one after the other on the same day. 3. Suffice it to observe that unless the Petitioners were to reassure the lower Court that the interest of the minor has been duly safeguarded, the question of accepting the proposal for Suit being disposed of on the basis of compromise, does not arise, as the Suit is filed by the guardian to espouse the cause of minor. Hence, this Petition is dismissed while keeping the option of the Petitioners to approach the Trial Court with further material to reassure the position that the minor’s interest has been duly safeguarded. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.