IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31503 of 2009 Gajendra Rishideo Versus State Of Bihar & Anr ---------------------------------- 2. 22.12.2011. Heard Mr. Satish Kumar Singh. learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 21.5.2009 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Saharsa in Cr.Revision no.220 of 2008 whereby the learned Sessions Judge while dismissing the application has been pleased to uphold the order dated 14.7.2008 passed by the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in Complaint Case No.523 of 2009, whereby the learned Magistrate was pleased to reject the application filed by the petitioner under section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure requesting for cross examination of the prosecution witness in the light of the amended charge. It is not in contest that no alteration in the charge framed under section 420 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code has been made, save and except, that the language of the charge has been altered by modification thereof, under order dated 2 28.4.2008. By the said modification, a charge of inducing the Government of Bihar to appoint the son of the complainant as Choukidar has been introduced. It is not in dispute that following the aforesaid modification, no fresh evidence has been led by the complainant in support of the modified charge requiring any cross examination by the petitioner by invoking the provisions of section 311 of the Code. In that view of the matter, no case for interference is made out and as such this application is dismissed. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)