THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 20019 of 2005 Dated:26.09.2005 Between: Lakkam Lasmaiah, S/o Ramaiah, r/o Supak Village, Kotapally Mandal, District Adilabad. ..... PETITIONER AND The District Collector, Adilabad, District & Proper Adilabad, and others. .....RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No. 20019 of 2005 ORDER: The land in Survey No.60 (old Survey No.57) of Supak Village, Kotapally Mandal, Adilabad District, was allotted to Prem Chand Hassmal Advani by the custodian under the provisions of the Displaced Persons (Compensation & Rehabilitation) Act, 1954. It appears Prem Chand Hassmal Advani obtained permission for alienation of the land and sold the land to the petitioner’s elder brother, Lakkam Mallaiah, under a registered sale deed. The petitioner and his brother partitioned the property, in which the petitioner’s share was Acs.8.13 guntas in Survey No.60. The petitioner alleged that on 10.08.2005, the second respondent called him to the office and directed to hand over the possession to the third respondent informing that the third respondent was issued a certificate under Section 38-E of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950. The petitioner, therefore, approached the District Collector and gave a representation seeking redressal, and it appears, the same was forwarded to the Revenue Divisional Officer for necessary report. Pending the same, as a threat of dispossession, the petitioner filed the present writ petition seeking a direction to the second respondent not to dispossess the petitioner, and a direction to the first respondent to dispose of the representation submitted by the petitioner through MLA. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue (Assignments). As the petitioner’s representation is pending before the first respondent, and as the petitioner has placed before this Court some material in support of his contention that the property he purchased, is from the original allottee, the District Collector may consider all these aspects and pass appropriate orders. Unless and until the District Collector passes appropriate orders, respondents 2 and 3 cannot interfere with the possession of the petitioner, if he is continuing in possession as on today. The District Collector may pass appropriate orders within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition, is accordingly, disposed of. No costs. ____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 26.09.2005 vs