IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12541 of 2010 S.Quaisar Sharfuddin S/O Late Sharfuddin Ahmed R/O Noor Compound, P.S. Civil Lines, Distt-Gaya. ..Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Commissioner and Principal Secretary, Higher Education Government of Bihar, Patna 2. The Chancellor of Universities of Bihar , through K.B.K Sahni, Deputy Secretary, Governer Secretariat Bihar, Patna 3. Magadh University, Bodh Gaya through Its Registrar 4. The Vice-Chancellor , Magadh University Bodh Gaya, Distt-Gaya. ..Respondents For the Petitioner: Mr. Rashid Izhar, Advocate. For the State: Mr. Dilip Kumar, AC to G.A.-2. For the Magadh University: M/s. Anil Kumar Sinha and Shakib Ayaz, Advocates. ---------------------------------- 3 02.12.2011 Heard counsel for the petitioner, the State and for the Magadh University. The petitioner is stated to be the Secretary of the Managing Committee of the Mirza Ghalib College, described as a minority educational institution. It is submitted that the need for the writ application arose in pursuance of certain requests made by persons with no authority in the law and total strangers to the institution or the Managing Committee, addressed to the Hon’ble Chancellor, requesting to take appropriate action leading to an instruction dated 08.07.2010 issued from the office of the Hon’ble Chancellor addressed to the Magadh University for appropriate remedial corrective action as suggested. During the pendency of the writ application, the Magadh University has made enquiry and has been satisfied that the Managing 2 Committee of which the petitioner is the Secretary was valid in accordance with law. Counsel for the University stands by the submission. It is fairly acknowledged that the writ application has become infructuous to that extent. A grievance has however, been sought to be raised that frivolous complaints were being entertained from persons with no authority or interest affecting the imparting of education when a Managing Committee contesting its survival would hardly be in a position to give its best to the institution. The Court does not consider it necessary to go into the larger question sought to be raised at this stage. They are left open for consideration at a later appropriate stage if necessary. The writ application stands disposed as infructuous. Md. Ibrarul ( Navin Sinha, J.)