IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 95 (Criminal) of 2010 Smt. Sonia and another. …………Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …….Respondents. Present: None appears for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Adhikari, learned AGA for the State /respondents no. 1 and 2. Coram: Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J Hon’ble Nirmal Yadav, J. List has been revised. None appears on behalf of the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Adhikari, learned AGA for the State of Uttarakhand / respondents no. 1 and 2 is present. It appears from the perusal of the record that the Bench of the Court vide order dated 10.02.2010 has directed that in view of the principle laid down in Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in (2006) 5 SCC 475, as an interim measure that on making an application by the petitioners to the respondents no. 2 necessary protection shall be provided to the petitioners, as and when it is found necessary. We, therefore, hold that no fresh order is required in this matter. It is for the petitioners to approach respondent no. 2 for seeking adequate and necessary protection in that regard. 2 With the aforesaid observation, writ petition is finally disposed of. (Nirmal Yadav, J.) (B.C. Kandpal, J) 25.03.2010 SKS