HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO C.R.P.Nos. 2547 and 2690 of 2009 COMMON ORDER: The petitioner, who is a third party filed these revision petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India inter alia seeking to assail the correctness of the order dismissing the applications in I.A. Nos. 16 and 17 of 2006 filed by her for impleading herself as proposed defendant to the suit proceedings and for condonation of delay. The case of the petitioner is that she has purchased the suit schedule property from the 2nd respondent on 4.10.2003 and therefore, she wants to come on record. However, the Court below without going into the merits of her claim as set forth by her, dismissed the aforementioned applications on the ground that I.A. No.15 of 2006 is dismissed. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record. Apparently, the Court below dismissed the applications merely on the ground of dismissal of I.A. No. 15 of 2006 and it did not dismiss the applications on merits. Except this, no other reason is assigned by the Court below for dismissing the applications. Further, the petitioner is not at all concerned with the other application, namely, I.A. No.15 of 2006. In the circumstances, I deem it appropriate to remand the matter back to the Court below for passing appropriate orders afresh on the aforementioned applications. Accordingly, the revision petitions are allowed and the impugned orders are set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Court below for passing appropriate orders afresh on the applications in I.A. Nos. 16 and 17 of 2006. No costs. ________________ B. PRAKASH RAO,J Date: 10th March, 2011 pnb