IN THE HON Petitioner Respondents ’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (cl Nojf3£Qg OF 2010 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Vishnuma] Hanspal, S /o Pesumal, aged 61 years, Unemploy6ed, R/o Main Road, Torwa, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur Versus Bilaspur Union of India, through the General Manager, South East Central Railway, 1. Divisional Manager, South East Railway, Bilaspur. 2. Divisional Engineer, South Central Railway, Bilaspur 3. Senior Divisional (Coordination), ' South East Central Railway, Bilaspur. 7 WRfI E’E’HTIUN Ms. 1A At the (3/ HXGE COURT OF CHHAT’HSGARH AT BILASP WRIT E’ETITION iC) No. 2979 ofZOlO UNDER AR'l'ICLE 2'26 OF THE CONS'l‘H‘UTION OF WDIA B: Hon’ble Shl'i Satish K. A nihotri J. Naushina Afrin Ali, Advocate far the respondents. OWNER (ORAL {Passed on 12“ day of Augush 201 1) very outset, learned counsel appeaying for the petitioner submits that the respondent authomies may be direc’teci to consider representations of the petitioner dated 191220085 22.10.2008, 18.08.2008 (Annexare P/26 eolly.) pending before the authorities, on sympathetic grounds. 2. Mg. Ali, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that in the event, the representations, as aforestated are pending consideration, the same shall be considered in accordance with law own merits and perspective. as expeditiously as possible, ably Within a period of six weeks fromthe date ofreceipt of »( l’resem: Shri Alok Bakshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Axi'ut on its prefer a copy ofthis order. ' 3. In View of the foregoing, teamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that nothing survives in this petition for I adjudication “‘4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. 14/ C; s Sdl- S E’ETITIONER VERSUS Divisional Manager, South East Cemrai RE$PONDENTS Railway 8c 3 others,