IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 11TH AUGUST 2011 / 20TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 21855 of 2011(F) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- 1. GREESHMA BENJAMIN, KOTTINGAL HOUSE, K.K.LANE, PUNKUNNAM, THRISSUR. 2. SAHITHA K.R., KARUMATHIL HOUSE, KIZHAKKUMPATTUKARA, EAST FORT, THRISSUR. 3. RADHA A.N., NERUVISSERY, AARATTUPUZHA P.O, URAKAM, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.V.M.SYAM KUMAR SMT.KRIPA ELIZABETH MATHEWS SRI.V.N.HARIDAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT REPRESENTED BY VICE CHANCELLOR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, THENJIPPALAM,, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.PIN-673 635 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENJIPPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.PIN-673 635 3. THE REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENJIPPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.PIN-673 635 R1 TO R3 BY ADV.SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW,SC, CALICUT UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.21855/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION AND ISSUANCE OF PHOTOCOPY OF THE ANSWER SHEET DATED 28/07/2011 PREFERRED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER. P2 COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION AND ISSUANCE OF PHOTOCOPY OF THE ANSWER SHEET DATED 28/07/2011 PREFERRED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. P3 COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION AND ISSUANCE OF PHOTOCOPY OF THE ANSWER SHEET DATED 02/08/2011 PREFERRED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO.JUDGE sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 21855 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 11th day of August, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Com Degree Course. When the result was declared, petitioners failed in one paper each in their final year. 1st petitioner failed in “Paper XIV-Indian Financial System”, 2nd petitioner failed in “Paper XV-Co-operation” and 3rd petitioner failed in “Paper-I Business Statistics”. They applied for revaluation as per Exts.P1 to P3 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 10 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp