IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1510 of 2010 AWDHESH KUMAR @ TANNA Versus STATE OF BIHAR For the petitioner :Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad For the State :Mr.Umesh Lal Verma, APP ----------- 03. 27.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 06.08.2010, passed on his appeal being Cr. Juvenile Appeal No.26/10/5/10, whereby his prayer for bail has been rejected. Petitioner is facing charge(s) punishable under sections 364A and 120B/34 IPC. It is admitted position that he has been declared juvenile and the matter is pending trial before the learned J.J. Board, Nawada. It further appears that he is in custody since 20.07.2009. The victim on his return from the captivity lodged the FIR in which the name of the petitioner does not figure. He named one Saurav Kumar along with a friend of his. Two days thereafter he made statement under section 164 Cr. P.C. in which he has named the petitioner as the aforesaid friend of co-accused Saurav Kumar. Admitted position is that Saurav kumar has been released on bail by this Court. Present application is supported by an affidavit affirmed by cousin brother of the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner submits that father of the petitioner is a practising advocate at civil court, Nawada. It is stated that he would be one 2 of the bailors and will keep a guard on the boy if released on bail. Having regard to the aforesaid facts/submission, this Court is inclined to admit the petitioner to bail. Accordingly, petitioner abovenamed is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. District and Sessions Judge-cum-F.T.C. Nawada in Cr. Juvenile Appeal No.26/2010/5/2010, subject to the condition that one of the bailors shall be father of the petitioner and another bailor will be his close relative. It shall be the duty of the father of the petitioner to monitor his activity and to produce him before the court concerned on the date fixed at the trial. In case of default in producing the boy on the date fixed at the trial, the trial court shall cancel his bail bonds. During subsistence of the present bail, if it is found that petitioner involves himself in any criminal case, the same shall be treated as breach of conditions of bail entailing cancellation of the same. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )