1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5068 OF 1997 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 301 OF 1990 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : P.R. BORKAR,J. DATED : 08.06.2010 1. Adv. Shri A.C. Darandale h/f. Adv. Shri R.N. Dhorde is present for the applicant. No one is present for the respondents. For the reasons given in para 2 and 3, the delay deserves to be condoned. It is stated in the application that respondent No.1 was residing at Ale, Tal. Junnar, Dist. Pune, at the time of her death and the applicant was not aware of her death. Similarly, respondent No.3 died but his legal representatives were not known. Therefore, the applicant had to make enquiries and for these reasons there was delay. 2. In the circumstances of the case, the application is allowed; delay 2 condoned and abatment set aside. The legal representatives of respondent Nos. 1 and 3 be brought on record. [P.R. BORKAR, J.] snk/2010/JUN10/ca5068.97