S.B. C. Writ Petition No. 2731/2010. (Ajay Kumar Meena & Anr. Vs. State of Raj. & ors.) Date of Order: 07/04/2010. HON'BLE MR. MOHAMMAD RAFIQ,J. Mr Santosh Srivastava, for the petitioners. The learned counsel cited the judgment of this Court in Shakti Singh Chauhan Vs. State & Ors., SB Civil Writ Petition No. 255/2010 decided on 19.3.2010. It is contended that the aforesaid judgment was passed on the basis of the judgment of this Court dated 1.12.09 passed in Naveen Kr. Sharma & ors. Vs. State whereby the following directions were issued: “Consequently, all these writ petitions are disposed of with the direction to the respondents to consider candidature of petitioners for appointment on the post of Teacher (Primary and Upper Primary Schools) on the basis of their selection made pursuant to advertisement dated 30.10.06 strictly in order of merit as per statement (supra) against available vacancies other than reserved for TSP area; and in case either of petitioners does not find place in order of merit in respective category for appointment, respondents shall inform each of them about his placement and reasons for which he could not be held eligible for appointment. Compliance be made within two weeks. No order as to costs.” The aforesaid judgment was rendered in relation to selection pursuant to advertisement dated 30.10.2006 which is also the process of selection in which the petitioners applied. The initiation of process of selection pursuant to said advertisement for the post of Teacher Gr.III in Primary and Upper Primary Schools under Rajasthan Panchayatiraj Rules, 1996. -2- In the circumstances, instead of directly entertaining this petition, the petitioners are first require to make a representation to the Commissioner, Primary Education, Rajasthan Jaipur who shall consider the case of the petitioners in the light of the observations made by this Court in the aforesaid judgment of Naveen Kr. Sharma and Shakti Singh Chauhan (supra) and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. In case either of petitioners does not find place in order of merit in respective category for appointment, the respondents shall inform each of them about his placement and reasons for which he could not be held eligible for appointment. Compliance be made within a period of three months from the date of submission of such representation. The petition is accordingly disposed of. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ),J. Gandhi/-P.A. Item no. 59