1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 1656 OF 2009 Vishal S/o Shashikant Dangat and others Versus The State of Maharashtra *** Mr. M. V. Gaware, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. P. M. Shinde, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. *** CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 2691 OF 2009 Yogesh Sakharam Dangat Versus The State of Maharashtra. *** Mr. S. T. Shelke, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. P. M. Shinde, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. *** CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 1717 OF 2009 Yogesh Sakharam Dangat Versus The State of Maharashtra. *** Mr. S. T. Shelke, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. P. M. Shinde, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. *** 1. Heard respective counsel and learned A.P.P. In an incident dated 17th April, 2009 a quarrel took place between the complainant, his brother and sixteen others, which included the applicants herein. It was contended in the report that Yogesh and Deepak were assaulted by Suhas. 2. On perusal of the F.I.R. prima facie I find role of Yogesh is indicated to be possessing a sword and having inflicted injuries. In the medical certificate, it is informed that the injured was unconscious for a considerable period. Consequently, no case for pre- arrest bail of Yogesh Sakharam Dangat. 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. 3. So far as Applicant Manoj Pandit Dangat and Sagar Sudam Dangat are concerned, though they are alleged to be in the unlawful assembly, there is no specific overt act attributed to them. Consequently, they deserve pre-arrest bail. It is informed, they do not have any criminal record. 4. So far as Vishal and Suhas are concerned, the F.I.R. discloses specific role as to dealt the complainant and others with fists blows and threats to eliminate. Consequently, they do not deserve pre-arrest bail. Hence, order. 5. In the event of arrest of the accused applicants Manoj S/o Pandit Dangat, Sagar S/o Sudam Dangat, they be released on their furnishing P.R.Bond and surety in the sum of Rs.10,000/- [Rupees ten thousands only], each. 6. The accused/ applicants shall attend concerned investigator on every Monday between 10.00 to 05.00 p.m. for a period of six months. 7. The accused/ applicants shall not influence and terrorise the witnesses or the complainant. 8. The application moved by Vishal S/o Shashikant Dangat, Suhas S/o Balasaheb Dangat and Yogesh Sakharam Dangat is rejected. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:18/08/2009. ans/1656