4 y ^' c^ iNTHEKIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CIVIL REVISION N0, / 2003 ^ 1) Nandkishore, Son ofTaransingh, Aged about 51 years, eiiiiayiB s^iiuH PETITIONERS PLAINTIFFS 3 to 9 2) Motiram, Son of Rambharos Sahu, Aged about 41 years, 3) Pancham, Son of Budhau, Aged about 65 years, 4) Rajkumar, Son of Bhatpariya, Aged about 18 years, 5) Ramavtar, Son of Miththu, Aged about 29 years, 6) Madho, Son of Ganesh Sahu, Aged about 40 years, 7) Siddharam, Son of Ganesh Sahu, Aged about 35 years, {All Residentsof Village - Tura, Semariya, Tahsil - Navagarh, Distt.-Durg (C.G.)} I'iii VERSUS '^ %^> 1) Gheevchand, Son of Bhuvan Satnami, Aged about 52 years Occupation - Agriculture, ResidentofTura, Semariya, Tahsil -Navagarh, District-Durg(C.G.) RESPONDENTS DEFENDANtrs ^v i'i3,;:l Wi:s •i :i'!B 13) Prem, Son of, Kunjram, Aged about 50 years, 14) Dhanush, Son of, Kunjram, Aged about 45 years, 15) Chandrika, Son of, Kunjram Satnami, Aged about 35 years, {Respondent No. 12 to 15 are agriculturist, & Resident ofVillage Dand, Tahsil - Mungeli, Distt. - Bilaspur(C.G.)} 16) Janaklal, Son of, Lakhani Satnami, Aged about 51 years, 17) Gopal, Son of Dakhani Satnami, Aged about 25 years, {Respondent No. 16 & 17 are resident of Village Tura, Semariya,Tahsil - Navagarh; Distt. Durg (C.G.)} 18) Amrit Bai, widow of Jugnu Satnami, Aged about 65 years, Resident of Village Tura, Semariya, Tahsil - Navagarh, Distt. Durg (C.G.) PLAINTIFF No.1 PLAINTIFF No.2 (Proceeded Exparte) 08.10.2001 19) Smt. Gulab Bai, W/o Gheevchand Satnami, ' Aged about 48, years, Occupation - agricuture, Resident ofVillage Manpur, Tahsil - Navagarh, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 20) Rajkumari, D/o Malikram, ' Aged about 13 years, Resident ofVillage -Tura, Semariya, Tahsil - Navagarh, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) 21) Kunwariya, D/o Malikram, Aged about 18 years, Resident of Village - Tura, Semariya, Tahsil - Navagarh, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) 22) Pyari Bai, D/o Malikram, Aged ^bout 12years, 23) Uttara Bai, D/o Malikram, Aged about 9 years, (Proceeded Exparte) 08.10.2001 ^ ^ y {Respondent No.49.to 23 are Bflinor, Through the Natural Guardian, mother Smt. Rajo Bai, W/o Malikram Gadariya, Resident of Viiiags - Rampur, Tahsil - Bemetara, Distt - Durg (C.G.)} ^" CIVIL REVISION UNDER SECTION 115 OF THE CODE OFCIVIL PROCEDURE XI-HC-22 sn^i'^' {?:iR?3l1^T wiiwHifer "Swt •ail^ld*), ^^•y'Ko, MMI'yy ini?ir g»*fl^i \..(L..^:..^^S1^ .......<^..»^..^.^:....^ ^ sn^T^gisgTflte 20.12.2W5 The matter was listed beforel On ttiis dato ttie applicaUon for was allowed and fte applfcants w^r® days for service of^ummons to the| dtd not comply with the above orders on default (rf non paymentl orderdated 21.03.20)5. Whenthematleriscayed In the aforesaid circumdane|Bs complianceofthe orderdated ! thisCourt on 21/TO/2Q05ond€rtault corldonation of delay in payment of P.F. cBrected to pay P.F. within seven respondente. However, the apirficant and the matter is sgain IWed tor [of P.F. in.compltance of tfie ©ouris' orOer noite '^F^TSft7T1?ii:?^? ^T sriigir; air^r appearedfortheapplicants. , the revlslon is dismBsed fer non 21A)3|f2005 Sd/-