* I N THE HI GH COURT OF JUDI CATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH * HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE V.RAMASUBRAMANI AN AND * HON’BLE MS. JUSTI CE J. UMA DEVI + C.R.P.No.3753 of 2018 Date: 23-10-2018 # Betw een: M/s. Karvy Financial Services Limited, Andheri East, Mumbai, rep. by its Authorised Signatory Mr. S. Naveen Kumar, S/o. S. Samba Siva Reddy, Occ: AVP Collections, R/o. Flat No.401, A-Block, PLNR Apartments,f Naidus Colony, Upperapally, Hyderabad – 500 048 … Petitioner/ decree holder And 1. M/s. Progressive Constructions Limited, House No.A1, MCH.No.6-3- 251/A/1 (New), Sy.No.114 part, H.No.6-3-351/7/B&A, Balapur Basti, Erramanzil, Hyderabad – 500 082. 2. Mrs. Srivani Mullapudi, W/o. MSRVK Ranga Rao, Occ: Director, House No.A1, MCH.No.6-3-251/A/1 (New), Sy.No.114 part, H.No.6- 3-351/7/B&A, Balapur Basti, Erramanzil, Hyderabad – 500 082 3. Mrs. Srimani Mullapudi, W/o. M.S. Rama Rao, House No.A1, MCH.No.6-3-251/A/1 (New), Sy.No.114 part, H.No.6-3-351/7/B&A, Balapur Basti, Erramanzil, Hyderabad – 500 082 4. M/s. Basil Infrastructure Projects Limited, House No.A1, MCH.No.6- 3-251/A/1 (New), Sy.No.114 part, H.No.6-3-351/7/B&A, Balapur Basti, Erramanzil, Hyderabad – 500 082. …. Respondent/JDRs ! Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. T. Bala Mohan Reddy ^ Counsel for Respondents : Mr. G. Vasantha Rayudu < GI ST: > HEAD NOTE: ? Cases referred VRS, J & JUD, J C.R.P.No.3753 of 2018 2 HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE V.RAMASUBRAMANI AN AND HON’BLE MS. JUSTI CE J. UMA DEVI C.R.P.No.3753 of 2018 ORDER: (per VRS,J.) Aggrieved by the rejection of an Execution Petition on the ground that the award was not duly transmitted in terms of the procedure stipulated under Order XXI Rule 10 C.P.C., the award holder has come up with the above revision petition. 2. Heard Mr. T. Balamohan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. G. Vasantha Rayudu, learned counsel for the respondents. 3. The question as to whether an award requires transmission, for the purpose of execution, is now finally settled by the Supreme Court in its decision in Sundaram Finance Limited v. Abdul Samad1. 4. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Court below. The Execution Petition shall be restored to file. However, it will be open to the Award Debtors to raise all other contentions before the Executing Court. 5. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ V.RAMASUBRAMANI AN, J. _____________ J.UMA DEVI , J. 23rd October, 2018. Js 1 (2018) 3 SCC (Civil) 622 VRS, J & JUD, J C.R.P.No.3753 of 2018 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE V.RAMASUBRAMANI AN AND HON’BLE MS. JUSTI CE J. UMA DEVI C.R.P.No.3753 of 2018 (per VRS, J.) 23rd October, 2018. Js