IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No. 11059 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : JULY 27, 2009 EX-CONSTABLE PALWINDERJIT SINGH, 2549/ASR. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Ms. GK Mann, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) It has been contended on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner was not associated with the inquiry or at later stages. On perusal of order (Annexure P-1), however, I find that it has been recorded that “But he refused to receive the list of charges and list of witnesses in the complaint and he asked to the enquiry officer that he does not want to get the departmental enquiry done from him and argued with them.” (Refer to running page 40 of the paper book). Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the Civil Writ Petition No. 11059 of 2009 2 petition with liberty to file a fresh petition, after the petitioner has inspected the record, before making any averment in the petition. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition, on the same cause of action, after getting complete particulars and correct details. July 27, 2009 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?