| 2570 l HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 15854 OF 2006 Between: 1. Mrs Manju Singh, Agcd 40 years wi O LT COL NK Singh Occ: House Wife, Ri O l-t No 33- I40/ 1 lsr FLOOR Shaktr Nagar RK Puram, Sccunderabad500 056 [AP] 2. Sri Ram Kumar singh [S/O Late Sri Sita Ram Singh] R/O Village Kharadaha PO Chaubeypur [(hurd] District VARANASI {UPl IPresently sta]'ing at R/O H No 33-140/ I Isr FLOOR Shakti Nagar RK Puram, Secunderabad500 056 [AP]l 3.LT COL NK SINGH Aged 50 years S/OSRIRKSINGI-I OCC: ARMY SERVICE Ri O H No 33-l4O/I lsr FLOOR Shakti Nagar R K Puram, Sccunderabad50O O56 [AP] Writ Petitioners AND i Tire Union of lndia Represented by Tir(. S(rcrctar}. lviinis;try ol Defence, (lovcrnmcnL oi lndia, NEW DELHI-11 2 The Sccrc ran' Nlinistry of Defence, Golcrnmcr rt of In<.lia, NEW DELHI- Ll-- 3 The Chief ol Army Staff Arml' HQ, D tlQ PO .,' NDW DELHI- I 1 t i 1 I t t iIt j I I II I i I tt I i 4. Director General ID\r] ArmY HQ, D HQ PO NEW DELHI 11 5,LT GEN HARI PRASAD GOC IN C HQ Nothern Command' c/o 56 APO 6,LTGENJBSYADAVA GOC HQ XVI CORPS c/o 56 APO i I I I T.LTGENTPSBRAR GOC HQ XVI CORPS c/o 56 APO 8. Maior Ceneral M'rhan Pundc uQ ZO tnr DlvlstoN c/o 56 APO 9, IC-25903H BRIG SS PAWAR PRESlDING OiiFICER Court of Inqui-Y ' HQ 26 INFANTRY DIVISION c/o s6 APO IO. IC-37139.P COLONEL T I I] ] I' II-S MEMBER Court of Inquiry, HQ 26 INFANTI?Y I)IVISIO\ c/o 56 APo 11. lC-371oOH COLONEL SP Sl\-(ll1 MEMBER Court of InquLry, HQ 26 INFANTRY DIVISION c/o 56 APO l2.COLONEL R/\JESH GANGELI'. COMMANDING OFFICER 225 MEDIUM REGIMENT c/o56APO j i I { I I I tiiItt It f I I 13.LT COL SAN.'AY KOTIIARI OFFICER RECORDING S OF ]'] 225 MEDIUM REGT c/o 56 APO ) I i i /effir'=e- -" ' rEt - 6 L ( Itt. I-{ l(' r f i ) j I4.MAJOR S N SHARMA INDEPENDENT WITNESS & OFFICER RECORDING S OF E 225 MEDIUM REGT c/os6APo 15. Mr SS Chib, Advocate CIO Bar Association High Court of J & K At Jammu High Court JAMMU p&Kl Respondents Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewrth, the High Court may be pleased to issue a direction, orders or a writ, more approprialely one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS d irecting/d ecla ring the action of the respondents herein "Declare the inaction of the 2nd Respondent herein to initiate criminal proceedings against the Respondents No.s to '14 as is mandated under the provisions of Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on the grounds submitted by the petitioners herein vide their legal notices addressed to 2nd respondent herein under intimation to all concerned, as being dereliction of his duty and infringement of pelitioners' right to seek appropriate redress at appropriate legal forum for the wrongs committed by the Respondents No. 5 to 14 a guaranteed Fundamental Right under Article 21 of the constitution of lndia, and therefore ULTRA VlRES". l.A. NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP. NO: 19770 OF 2006) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in suppo( of the petition, the High Cou( may be pleased to direct 2nd 3rd and 4th respondents to institute an impartial inquiry into the allegations made against the Respondents No. 5 to 14 heretn in the matter of abusing the statutory power/disciplinary powers vested in them by virtue of their appointment and initiate appropriate departmental action in the matter under intimation of this Hon'ble Court". Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. VISHAL SAXENA (NOT PRESENT) Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 to 4: SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.S to '15: SRI T. VENKAT RAJU GOUD SC FOR CG The Court made the following: ORDER t Ii t HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.1 5854 of 2OO6 ORDER: Despite listing tl're rlatter in the caption 'for dismissal', torlay. (hcre is no representation on ev('n behalf o[ ti-rc 1tr:Lrtioncrs Thereforc. tl-ris Writ I)t'tition is dismissed for non- prosecutlon Tlrcre shall lrt tto tlrder as to costs. Asa sequr:I, the rrr ist'cllaneous petitions, if any, pending in tl-re \.\rrit p6-1i1ion sl.rzrll stand closed' To, 1. 2. 2 4. CHR SB One One One Two CC to CC to CC to CDC Sri Vrshal Saxena, Advocate [OPUC Sri Gadr Praveen Kumar, DePutY So Sri T Venkat Raju Goud SC for Ce opies //TRUE COPY// SD/.N.SRIHARI ASSISTANLREGISTRAR Q9 SECNON OFFICER ntral Government [OP loPUCl UC] icitor General of lndia tl{.'' )z\ HIGH COURT DATED:1 210412023 ORDER W.P.No.15854 of 2006 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS .1 i'.:' n,! Li- n \j\-\ f.l ,4 it> \ t.t i?1