1 cr-appa-484-10 jdk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. APPLN.NO. 484 OF 2010 IN CRI.APPEAL NO. 258 OF 2010 IN SESSIONS CASE NO. 20 OF 2010 Raju Devji Revaskar ..Appellant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent .... Ms. Anjali Patil Adv. for appellant Mr. S.A.Shaikh APP for State .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. DATE : AUGUST 27, 2010 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. The applicant has been convicted under Section 376 of IPC. The appeal preferred by the applicant is pending. The applicant is now seeking bail. 2 The evidence of prosecutrix PW 1 Jayashree clearly makes out a case of rape. The C.A. report shows that semen was found on the 2 cr-appa-484-10 `Salwar' and `Kurta' of the prosecutrix. The learned APP has pointed out that besides the present case, the applicant is involved in six other cases, the details thereof are as under: Sr. No. Police Station CR/NC Nos. Sections 1 N.M.Joshi Marg 182/2008 354, 353, 324, 504 and 427 of IPC 2 N.M.Joshi Marg 191/2009 324, 504, 506(II) of IPC 3 N.M.Joshi Marg NC 2443/2007 323,504, 506 of IPC 4 N.M.Joshi Marg NC 817/2008 323, 504 of IPC 5 N.M.Joshi Marg NC 1015/08 323, 504 of IPC 6 N.M.Joshi Marg NC 1602/08 343, 506 of IPC 3 In this view of the matter, at present I am not inclined to grant bail to the applicant. The application is rejected. Liberty is granted to the applicant to prefer a fresh application for bail after a period of one year. 4 Application is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]