IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.16372 of 2011 Date of Decision.05.09.2011 Sushila wife of Manjeet son of Parhlad Singh, resident of village Patwan, Tehsil Loharu, District Bhiwani .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana through Chief Secretary to Govt. of Haryana, Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Surinder Singh Duhan, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Notice of motion. 2. At the asking of Court, Ms. Kirti Singh, DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 to 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner will supply six copies of writ petition to the counsel appearing for respondents. 3. The petitioner has a serious apprehension of life and liberty at the instance of respondent Nos.7 to 22, who, according to the petitioner, are issuing diktats to run riot in their villages and taking law in their own hands. The respondents No.4 and 5 shall act on the representation (Annexure P-3), given by the petitioner and shall give appropriate protection if the situation so warrants and ensure that the petitioner does not come to any harn at the instance of respondent Nos.7 to 22. 4. The writ petition is disposed of in the above direction. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE September 05, 2011 Pankaj*