IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.21151 of 2011 Daujee Singh Versus The State Of Bihar 3/ 17.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is shown one of the four assailants of the deceased. There is allegation about indiscriminate firing by all the four including this petitioner. Number of injuries is nine. Eight of them are for four shots as communicating injuries. There are two witnesses only shown present at the place of occurrence, informant and his labourer, Ramdeo Bind. Of them, informant is only to say that he saw the miscreants from very beginning including their appearance at the place of occurrence, while Ramdeo Bind is stating about remaining in Gawshala though watching miscreants including their firing. No doubt, Ramdeo Bind is not naming this petitioner. Final form is submitted in the case exonerating this petitioner differing there from cognizance is taken. This petitioner twice approached this Court and finally the Hon’ble Supreme Court also. This Court was approached for anticipatory bail and for quashing the prosecution, while Supreme Court for anticipatory bail which is withdrawn but he lost in both attempts. Considering the above discussed circumstances, prayer of the petitioner for bail is rejected. However, Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. Shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)