iiI!im"n"'!i!iiii]ii]]Tii IN THE HON*BLE HI6H OOUKT OF CHHATTISQARH AT BIjaASPUR CIVIL REVISION N0. S£V ?. ^' ./2004 ^i"?is APELIC&NT nsf&lc't^SfSfei Ns'^ta^ | VERSUS NON-APPLIGANTS ^.wy %r .-'' je-'~ y. ,••' ^' /^ , ^^/ <,^^< ^'<^ ^f Snt. Rarakkimari aged about 45 years, wldow o£ labe Panahrain satnami, R/o. villagetTanjj., P.S. Seep»». Tah. & Bistt* Bilaspar (c.G.). OtiAIMANT 1. Saatosh Kumar Satnami, S/o» Butanu, R/o. village iTanji, Tah. & Bistt. Bilaspur {C.G«)» 2^ Ramadhar S/o« Runwa, R/o. Mulmula Police Station Pamgarb, Present R/o. A/196 Basant vihar, S.E.C.L. Bilaspur (G.G.). 3. United Insurance GXmpany Limited Korba, tbrougfa ;- Brancb Manager Transporb Nagar, Korba, Distt. Korba (C»G.). NON-d.AIMANTS v CIVIL REVISION U/S"115 OF CIVIL PROeEDBRE GODE . -t-feA—find&r' XI-HC-22 sn^rw fN?>3n^r stiiiqi gfer t.'. 3^"i)WMii, ^hww, f^rray Q OT^ M?rai *ii*<ni stifrei „-...€;jK-i 2<%l° 200 ^B^ sn^TCTdTWflfer ^rafepfrrwRTrfffei^ <Riyit ^ari^man^r 2»02Q005 Shri Malay Kumar Bheriuri, co|unsel for the applicant. Shri Abhishek Sinha, counsel fw respondent No.3. Heard. The instant revision petition| aggrieved by the Impugned order has been fited by the appticantas he is dated 10/09ff004 passed by the Clalms Tribunal, Bilaspur by which the applicfation ofthe applicanVclaimant for reteasecf Rs. 45,000/- from her F.D.R. accourft, which was deposited as per directions of the learned Claims Tribunal hasbeeifi rejected. Leamed counsel for appllcant submits that he has filed the application Tor release of the above amount on th^ ground that she needed the same for the marriage of her daughter and also |for her treatment However the same was dismissed bythe Claims Tribunal stsjting that already a substantial sum has been withdrawn by the applicant out ofth^ awarded sum. From the pemsal of the Impjigned order, it is ctear that she has atready withdrawn Rs. 95,600/- from the awejrded sum on the samegrounds. Having constfered the fact^ and circumstances of the case and the infirmities passed in the order of Q deserves to be dismissed and accort In view of the above, I.A. N(| ^laims Tribunal, the instant revision petition lingly it is dismissed, i. 3^0/2004 and 3491/2004 stand disposed of. Sd/- DbirendraMisbra Judge