IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :- THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH MARCH 2008 / 6TH CHAITHRA 1930 WA.No.701 of 2008 -------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.36811/2007 Dated 22/02/2008 .................... APPELLANT: WRIT PETITIONER:- ---------------------------------------------- REGHUNANDANAN, S/O.SIVASANKARAN NAIR AGED 43 YEARS, RESIDING AT ANANDA BHAVAN T.C.9/1119, MANGALA LANE, SASTHAMANGALAM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS:- ----------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, ROADS AND BUILDINGS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE SPECIAL THAHASILDAR (LA) ADDITIONAL LAND UNIT, VANCHIYOOR THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. ABDUL REHMAN, S/O.MOHAMMED HANEEFA, T.C.9/2177, KANISON BLDG., MADRASSA LANE, SASTHAMANGALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. W.A.NO.701/2008 -2- 6. M. HASSAN, S/O.MOHAMMED HANEEFA, T.C.9/2177, KANISON BLDG., MADRASSA LANE, SASTHAMANGALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 7. TRIVANDRUM DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, TRIDA BLDG, MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 TO R4 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.K.BABU. R7 BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.K.A.JALEEL. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & K.M.JOSEPH, J. ------------------------------------------------------ W.A.No.701 of 2008 ------------------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 26th day of March, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu, C.J. This appeal is directed against the orders passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.36811 of 2007 dated 22nd February, 2008. (2). The learned Single Judge has disposed of the writ petition following the Full Bench decision of this Court. Therefore, we do not see any error in the orders passed by the learned Single Judge which calls for our interference. Accordingly, the writ appeal requires to be rejected and it is rejected. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE MS