IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3019 of 2010 1.BABLU son of Sajjad 2.Md. Anjar son of Md. Siddique, r/o village Madhopur machine, P.S. Kanti, Dist. Muzaffarpur(West)…Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 15.3.2010 Heard Mr. Prabhakar Jha , learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. Anand Mohan Mehta, learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under sections 379 and 384, besides other sections of the Penal Code. According to the prosecution case co-accused Md. Manzoor is alleged to have taken out Rs. 20,000/- from the pocket of complainant and co-accused Md. Parvej is alleged to have snatched mobile of the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is no specific allegation of any specific overt act against the petitioners and they are not alleged to have made any demand for extortion. They are also not alleged to have snatched any article of the complainant. Be that as it may, in the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within four weeks from - 2 - today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, J.M. Ist class, Muzaffarpur in complaint case no. 850 of 2009, Tr. No. 713/09, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) Cr. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) M.Rahman