WPMS No. 1459 of 2009 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Shri Parikshit Saini, Advocate present for the defendant/tenant. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 19.08.2009, passed by Prescribed Authority, Dehradun, on application No. 144A and 160 A, in Rent Control Case No. 77 of 2004, Rajeshwari Devi Vs. Sumitra Devi. Heard. Impugned order shows that the defendant/tenant is making every effort to linger the proceedings of the release of accommodation in question, initiated by the present respondent (landlord), and as such, applications for filing fresh supplementary affidavit, on behalf of defendant/tenant, were rejected by the prescribed Authority. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and after going through the impugned order, passed by the Prescribed Authority, this Court does not find it fit to interfere with the impugned order in its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 and 227 of Constitution of India. The petition is dismissed summarily. (Stay application No. 7547 of 2009, also stands dismissed). (P. C. P., J.) Dt. 01.09.2009 S