- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2088 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.2088 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.2088 OF 2007 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.1811 OF 1996 NO.1811 OF 1996 NO.1811 OF 1996 Bank of Baroda ...Plaintiffs vs. Gopal C. Poddar and others ...Defendants Ms Shila Mistry i/b Mr.Jayesh Patel for the plaintiffs None for the defendants CORAM CORAM CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : OCTOBER 2,2008 : OCTOBER 2,2008 : OCTOBER 2,2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the plaintiffs in support of the chamber summons. She states that the defendants have been duly served with the chamber summons and affidavit of service has been filed. 2. An order of abatement has been passed in the suit filed by the plaintiffs on 13th September 2007. The prayer in the chamber summons is for setting aside the order of abatement. In view of the averments made in the affidavit in support, a case is made out for condonation of delay and for setting aside the abatement. 3. Hence, chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (c). Amendment to be carried out within a period of six weeks from today. - 2 - JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE