IN THE HIGH COUR T OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29035 of 2011 Indrajit Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2 22.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner has prayed for extension of the period which he availed as per order dated 30.01.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No.55011 of 2007 being operative up till August, 2011. Admittedly, as per order sheet it is evident that the same was filed on 26.08.2011 that means to say before expiry of the stipulated period. However the matter has come up after the stipulated period for which, it has been submitted that it is not due to fault at the part of the petitioner. It has also been submitted that petitioner is presently staying at U.S.A. proceeding with his research. As per para-9 of the petition it has been incorporated that research was to be completed within December, 2012. However, para-10 suggests that on account of serious health issue (non supported by any document) now the same will be completed by 2012 and thereafter one more year is required for practical training. Therefore, I do feel to allow the petitioner should avail the privilege what he was given at an earlier occasion operative up to August, 2011 extending it up to December, 2013 with a direction that if by non-appearance of petitioner, the learned lower court finds hindrance in proceeding with the trial, the privilege so granted will automatically seized. PN (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)