Ij^: .. ^ •K\p' I-HC—78 3^ET ^I^I^A), ?$T{I<-I^I(S, fs|<?')|^^< ^l^dl *NI<4» ^ 200 ;33^r ^T R-iioh :n^r^ri^ 3n^?T J^3R ( 4^^<iyr) '^nW^f^T^T^T <=bi^t<n<i1Ti ^i^<rff ^fe^ <Pn<^i< '^3:fRR3TI^T S1NGLE BENCH: HON'SLE JUSTICE DMIRENDRA MISHRA w. PETiTSONER Piaintiff RESPONDENT Defendant 2S.2.2008 ?.rc1 N0.712/08 Vs Chandr^ Chawdc Biiaspuit, Tehsil (Chhatti^garh) ikant Chawda, S/o Shri Chimanlal , aged 59 years, R/o Laxmi Talkies, & District Bilaspur Jagann^ith Prasad Gupta, S/o Shri Ganga Prasad | Gupta, aged 59 years, R/o Ar/ind Bhawarl, Imlipara, Bilaspur, Tehsil & District Bilaspuij (Chhattisgarh) Mr. Sanjay S Agarwal, A^ Mr. R.S. Gupta, Advocat^ Heard. Grievance of tho petition| District Judge, Biiaspur vide No.58/2007 has imposed a ivocate for the petitioner. i for the respondent. ^r in this petition is that learned 1st Additional order dated 3.1.2008 passed in Civil Su'rt Rs.3,500/- on the petitioner as the handwriting expert examined b^ 5t Of was filed by the petitioner for adgournment. After going through the consjdered opinion that there is the trial court which warrants inl Article 227 ofthe Constitution o1 In the resutt, the petition the petitioner was absent and an appiication ^etition and the impugned orcier, 1 am of the [no dlegality or jurisdiction error committed by [erference in the exercise ofjurisdjction under India. has no substance, the same deserves to be dismissed and it is hereby djsm|ssed at the admission stage itself. .t^ ^r i