WP(C) 124/2008 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. C. Baishya, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. R. Chokraborty, learned Addl. Sr. Govt. Advocate. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a directio n to the respondents to appoint him in a suitable post on compassionate ground. The prayer so made is on account of death of his father, namely Late Prafulla Bo rah who died in harness on 30.07.99. At the time of death he was serving as Cons table in Assam Police. It appears that the petitioner had earlier approached this Court by fili ng W.P.(C) No. 5372/05 and the same was disposed of by order dated 29.07.05 dire cting the authority to consider the case of the petitioner by way of disposal of the representation within three months. However, the representation has not be en disposed as yet. In the mean time, long 11 years have passed since the death of the father of the petitioner. In the counter affidavit filed by the respondents, it has been stated th at the case of the petitioner was mooted in different levels and eventually he w as invited for physical/ medical test held at Nagaon on 22.12.07. As per the sai d affidavit, the proposal for consideration of the case of the petitioner was su bmitted to the Deputy Commissioner, Nagaon on 11.03.2008. It is also the stand o f the respondents that the case of the petitioner was placed before the District Level Committee as per the procedure. However, nothing has been stated about th e outcome of consideration of the case of the petitioner. In the affidavit in reply, the petitioner has denied the stand of the re spondents that he was directed to appear before the appropriate Board for physic al /medical test at Nagaon Police Reserve on 22.12.07. According to the petition er he did not receive any intimation whatsoever. This Court in the case of Achyut Ranjan Das vs. State of Assam and other s reported in 2006 (4) GLT 674 has framed certain guidelines towards appointme nt on compassionate ground. Further, in terms of the earlier order passed by thi s Court, the representation made by the petitioner was to be disposed of within three months. However, the respondents have not done anything of this sorts. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of directing the res pondents to apprise the petitioner about the outcome of consideration of his cas e by the District Level Committee followed by State Level Committee. Entire exer cise shall be carried out taking into account the guidelines laid down in the af oresaid two cases as expeditiously as possible and the results thereto shall be intimated to the petitioner without any further delay.