1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 45/2008 (Ramesh & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 05/02/2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. Niranjan Singh for the petitioners. Mr. J.P.S.Choudhary Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and challan papers. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the injuries suffered by injured Abhay Singh are simple in nature and petitioner Santosh alleged to have been armed with Barchhi but not inflicted any injuries to injured by Barchhi. On being examined by the Radiologist, the injuries were found to be simple in nature and on non- vital parts. So far as other injured Dinesh is concerned, he suffered fracture of 9th rib which has been assigned to either Sohanlal or Muknaram who were armed with Lathi. But in any case, no injury has been assigned to the present petitioners. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, without commenting on the merit of the case, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is 2 allowed and it is directed that petitioners Ramesh S/o Hadman and Santosh S/o Hadman be released on bail in FIR No. 242/07 P.S. Gangashahar, district Bikaner, provided each of them executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP