f ^x""1^.:. te®?S^. 9 ^Msg-'^- XI-HC—78 ^' »\\6^ '7^[^|^{<^<<|, ^Ti1^^(o, f^Kns^y *1i*lCTl (h*ll<ih •^200 3?l^T^Tl^NF ?CT 3T^T^F»'qW 3TI^T 'q^^' (y<I^<^T) 'swrw^^T^iT w. PBTITIONBRS 1. Jagd^sh Prasad Dewangaii, S/o Late Shri Raiii^hagas, aged about 56 years, Teacher, R/o Akaltjara, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (CG) Kiuxiar Kashyap, S/o Late Shri B.L, ^ap^ aged about 58 years, Asst. Teacher, IKapaa, Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir-Cbampa 2. Nare^ KasN? R/o (CG)| 3. Siag4, Chanldxa VCTSUS Porh]|dalfaa, Chanjipa RB8PONDBNTS 1. Sta^ Bhaj 2. 3. Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. SB: HON. 8HRI DHIRBNDftA MI8HRA. J 23-1-2009 Heaid. The petitioners were ^bl^d^l^ '^TR^ff '^fe^^^K ^^tRw a^?T (81 No. 415/2009 Mohan Singh, S/o Late Shri Lalji , aged about 58 years, Asstt, Teacher, R/o Thaaa, Akaltara, Distt Janjgir- of Chhatdsgarh, fhrough : Secretaiy, Bdu|3ation & Tribal Department, DKS ^osi Raipiar (CG) Assljt. Coiaxnissioner, Tribal Welfare Dep^rtment, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (CG) Distjrict Education Officer, Distt, Jaajgir- Cha|npa (CG) Adv^cate for fhe petitioners. Advocate fi>r fhe State. GoH. WRIT PBTITION WH3BR ARfriaLB 226 OSt THB COIISTn>UTI<»LO^INmA jmitialfy appomted as Aasistant Teachers ia fhe schools of Tribal Wel^re Department of the State Govermnent They were appointed on px^bation for a fixed period and fixed salaiy by ^ ^ XI-HC—78 ^^ ^i'&iKn^, ^xi1wi<o, [®l<:'tl-yl|^ 3?T^T^Tf^?Nl WR 3qiisi ^^ich »n<i<m(b*iicb •^200 3T1^?T TT5RR> (^qt^q<^f) '?^HW ^rf?^ ^T?^?T -^ ^T^{^i<4li "RTR^f ^ fe^ <f^l^.lT i?3t^r3iT^T fhe respondents, Their ser^lces were regularized after completioxi of probation period and they w^re graiited regiilar pay scale firom the date of fheir regiilarizatioii. The pssue mvolved m fhis petitloa is whefher fhe petitioners are entitled 4>^ regulm* pay scale fix>m fhe date offhieir uutial appomtment or jBrom Ijbie date offheir regulanzation ? Leanied counsel for ti|ie petitioHers subxnlt fhat fhe above issue has been considered by ^he M,P< State Administratioai Tribunal, Jabalpur ia O.A. No. .2745/|89 (Madliuhant Yadu and 56 others State of M.P. and others), ^hercby it was held fhat siaiilariy situated teachers are entitled to regi}Llar pay scales wifh effect from fhe ioitial date of fheir appomtaaents. |The above matter was taken up upto the Hon'ble Suprenie Court aa^ the Hon^ble Supreme Court vide order dated 3-1-1994 passed mS^.L.P.(C) No. (2) 6892/93 ftaalfy disinissed ihe appeal of the State Go^eniment, It was furth^r argued Ihat fhe State Goveniment vide orde^ 27-12-2008 passed by fhe Department of Schedule Caste aad Sched regular pay scale to aU ihe I who were appoiaited before ] ^ile Tribes has granted approval to pay |y, Teachers/Assistaiit Teacliers/ Teachers 082 aad after 1995 fi?om fhe date ofimtial appomtment after their si^ccessful completion of probation period, The case offhe petitioners i^ squarety covered by the order dated 12-2- 2007 passed by fhis Courtj in W.P. (S) No. 813/2007 fRam Kumar Saliu -v- State of Gliliattlayjsarli and another) where regular pay scale was granted wifh eflfect froin On ftie other hand, appearfag for the State^ fhe initial date ofappoiiitnient Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt Advocate ibxnitted fhat only such Dy. Teachers, :'». ''t;,.. T ^ XI-HC—78 ^^ T<1|t11<1<4, %9Ti1<-l< , Ri^fl'Hy 3^T ^T frff^ WT 31T^T 9b^(W NINtflT (h*l(<*» "^200 3^?T TraSjT (^qI^^sT) Y^TWR^S^W -^ Assistant Teachers orTeae}iers who were appoiuted betweeai 1982-83 to 1994-95 are entitied to g< mitial appoiiitment after si^ ^t fhe benefit of regular pay scale from fheir ccessful completion oftwro y^ara probatton period. However, when Sh|n Bhatia was conjGronted wifh fhe latest memo No. F-14-25/2007/^ Goveraraent, he did not ^ispute fhat fhe Dy, Teachers/ Assistant Teachers/ Teachers, who after 1994-95 are also ent^Ued for regiilar pay scale fix>m fhe iaitial date offheir appomtaient. Havmg hjeard teame(| ttie memo No. F 14-25/2c(07/25-l dated 27-12-2008 issued by the Scheduled Castes aad S^ Goverament aad fhe decisi< aaother) (Supra), the oid^ 3566/2007 (Loknath Patel the pefition is allowed ia fh^ However, fhis order ^ fhe State rcgardiag fhe fact^ '^7Rfwft;T 'WT^tf ^ Fs<<l if^l^K ^? 3:ifro 3:nt^r 5-1 dated 27-12-2008 issued by the State ^ere appoiated even beforc 1982-83 and counsel for fhe parties, havixig rcgard to &edule Tribes Depfeirtment of fhe State >n ofthis Court dated 12-2-2007 passed in W.P. No. 813/2007 (Ram Kjumar Sahu -v- State of ChliattltB^rli aad r dated 27-6-2007 passed in W.P.(S) No. -v- State of Cliliattia^garh and otliers), terms ofaforesaid judgmente. hatl be subject to aB verifications made by pleaded m fhe petitioxi. ..A-- ^a^swa ^n^