1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4037 /2010 (Ravindra W Kaskhedikar vs. Asst. Charity Commissioner and another ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 3 rd DECEMBER, 2010. Heard Mr B G Kulkarni, learned counsel for the petitioner. It is apparent that as enquiry under section 22 of Bombay Public Trusts Act cannot be finished within the tenure of the body elected and for which the change report is pending, the tenure cannot be incorporated in Schedule I. Learned counsel has tried to demonstrate that even if such enquiry is concluded in future, the findings recorded are for the particular period only and hence incorporation of that period in Schedule I definitely assists the supervision of trust by Charity Commissioner authorities and also other persons who have to deal with that trust. The tenure of the body is always specified in the constitution and hence its incorporation at each time when change report is accepted or entry is amended, is not necessary. If any person whose name appears in such Schedule, attempts to abuse that entry, there are sufficient safeguards in Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 to check it. By mere addition of tenure in that Schedule such 2 an abuse cannot be prevented. Writ Petition is, therefore, rejected. No costs. JUDGE sahare.