ih' [ enc: o’l LT. ana RAL éRbER (21 7-2010) l have eard teamed counsel for the pav Ies and perused the orde ated 8 8 2008 (Annexure Pm pas V Masc Cm: Appeal No 05m? .L V i J ‘V nde order Impugned learned District Judge has passed the followmg DistrictJudge Reaarh In (2) T§he appettants/respondents No2 to 4 may file appropriate petitio efore the revenue Court for possession of the property, and , , ' (3) Stay order passed by the Court below /relatlng to revenue‘ proceeding is vacated ’ Both the parties have agreed that till disposal of the swt the parties are required to maintain status quo relati possessmn of the edit} property Cival SUit fordeclaration perma niunction and declaration f sae eed as null and vaid ts pending befere the CM! Court ln these Circumstances continuance or staying the revenue proceedmg is of no use; lj _ ‘ ‘ s regards the liberty to file separate proceeding for possession befor the revenue Court the parttes have not fled any proceeding before th revenue Court ln terms of Section 250 of the Chhattisgarh Lan Revenue Code 1959 and in case of proceeding under Section 1 1G o he Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code Viz for mutation any order elating to vacant possessron would not be legally possible ' r I ‘ Therefore the petition ls partly allowed The order impugned is partly modifled and order relating to liberty to fie separate proceeding for possessmn is hereby quashed No order as to cost , ' Sci/- TP Shann f Judge 2" J S eBh Hnbé ML Shh ‘o V . h r d s ' ‘ L V g ; ,1) The parties directed to mamtam status q o relating to po ( ssessmn H , n ‘ r b 5 i .f n ‘ 1 n : l ? o l d L . A e e d f V t r . s ' a w