1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3267 OF 1994 Pandit s/o Gyanaba Salpe, age: major, Occ: Agri., R/o now residing at Sultanpur, Tq. and District Beed. Petitioner Versus 1 Ajit s/o Manikrao Salpe, age: 18 years, Occ: student, R/o Hiversinga, Tq. Patoda, District Beed. 2 Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad. Respondents None for the petitioner. Mr.S.S.Bora, advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr.T.S.Lodhe, A.G.P. for Respondent No.2. CORAM: R. K.DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 30 th July, 2010. ORAL JUDGMENT: 1 By an order dated 24.09.1990, the Tahsildar, Patoda, has recorded mutation entry no.1399 in the name of petitioner on the basis of registered sale deed. This order was challenged in appeal under Section 247 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code by the Respondent before the Sub Divisional Officer, Beed. By an order dated 03.01.1991, the Sub Divisional Officer has set aside the order dated 24.09.1990 passed by the Tahsildar and has further directed the parties to get their dispute adjudicated through the 2 Civil Court. 2 None appears for the petitioner, though matter is called out twice. 3 With the assistance of learned Counsel Shri Bora appearing for Respondent No..1, I have gone through both the orders passed by the authorities below. The order of mutation entry no.1399 in the name of petitioner passed by Tahsildar on 24.09.1990 has been set aside. The parties are granted liberty to get their dispute adjudicated through the Civil Court. In view of this, no fault can be found with the order passed by the appellate authority. 4 Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. (R. K.DESHPANDE) JUDGE ******* adb/wp326794