hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 943 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 943 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 943 OF 2008 Shantilal Manshi Sanghvi and anr.. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors.. Respondents Mr. Dharmendra Joshi for the petitioner. Mr. Niranjan Pandit, A.G.P. for R. nos. 1 to 8. Mr. Sampatrao Pawar along with Mr. A.S. Karwande for R. nos. 9 and 10. Mr. Amol Yadav resident Dy. Collector present. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & A.A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. A.A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. A.A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. DATED: OCTOBER 08, 2008 DATED: OCTOBER 08, 2008 DATED: OCTOBER 08, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . A plot of land was allotted to Respondent No. 9 by order dated 24.12.1979. By order dated 17.9.2008 the said order has been withdrawn along with the building standing thereon which are resumed to the Government. . Considering the above, the Petition as now filed would not survive. However, we make it clear that if Respondent No. 9 has any grievance against the order dated 17.9.2008, the disposal of this petition will not stand in his way. We further make it clear that if the land is resumed back in favour of Respondent No. 9 and if the Petitioner has still any grievance, then it will be open for him to pursue his grievance. . In so far as Prayer Clause (b) is concerned, that cannot be considered on the civil side. Petitioner if advised, always can prefer a petition on the criminal side of this court. (A.A. KUMBHAKONI, J.) (A.A. KUMBHAKONI, J.) (A.A. KUMBHAKONI, J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)