( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6554 OF 2010 Ramdas s/o. Pandharinath Sangle & Ors. .. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. A.B. Kale, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. D.R. Korde, A.G.P. for respondent No.1. Mr. G.B. Rajale, Advocate for respondent No.2 & 3. CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 16.08.2010 P.C. :- 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. Learned advocate for respondent Nos. 2 & 3 i.e. acquiring bodies, would submit that presently no work is being carried out in the lands of the petitioner and unless due procedure is followed in regard to acquisition by issuing notification under section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act and appropriate action thereafter as contemplated under sections 6,11,12 & 16 of the Land Acquisition Act, no adverse action will be taken against the petitioners. He submits that notification under section 4 ( 2 ) (1) of the Land Acquisition Act is already issued. He is at liberty to serve the same on the petitioners and if the same is not accepted, it may be served by alternate mode. On the basis of such statement, the petition is disposed of. [V.R. KINGAONKAR,J.] snk/2010/AUG10/wp6554.10