IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, CHIEF JUSTICE CONTEMPT CASE No.1069 of 2007 and I.A.No.3 of 2008 (Review WPMP No.26892 of 2008) in WRIT PETITION No.12094 of 2007 (Through virtual mode) CONTEMPT CASE No.1069 of 2007 P. Satish Babu S/o. Srinivasulu Naidu, Aged about 31 years, R/o. Nellore, Nellore District. …Petitioner Versus Sri Venkateswara University, Rep. by its Registrar Sri C.K. Mohan Rao, Tirupati, Chittoor District. …Respondent Counsel for the petitioner : Mr. S.Lakshminarayana Reddy (not present) Counsel for the respondent : Mr. Kasa Jaganmohan Reddy (not present) I.A.No.3 of 2008 (Review WPMP No.26892 of 2008) in WRIT PETITION No.12094 of 2007 The S.V. University, Thirupathi, Rep. by its Registrar. …Petitioner Versus P. Satish Babu S/o. Srinivasulu Naidu, Aged about 31 years, R/o. Nellore, Nellore District. …Respondent Counsel for the petitioner : Mr. Kasa Jaganmohan Reddy (not present) Counsel for the respondent : Mr. S.Lakshminarayana Reddy (not present) COMMON ORDER (ORAL) Dt: 21.01.2022 Both the contempt case and the review petition arise out of the order dated 13.08.2007 passed in W.P.No.12094 of 2007. The contempt 2 case has been filed by the writ petitioner alleging non-compliance of the said order, while the review petition has been filed by the respondent in the writ petition seeking review of the order. Today, when the matters are called, none appears either for the petitioner in the contempt case or for the review petitioner. Even on the last date of hearing, i.e., on 08.10.2021, none appeared for the respective parties. In view of the same, both the contempt case and the review petition are dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, CJ IBL 3 HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, CHIEF JUSTICE CONTEMPT CASE No.1069 of 2007 and I.A.No.3 of 2008 (Review WPMP No.26892 of 2008) in WRIT PETITION No.12094 of 2007 Dt: 21.01.2022 IBL