1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3817 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3817 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3817 OF 2007 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1865 OF 2005 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1865 OF 2005 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1865 OF 2005 Gajanan Krishnaji Tandel. .. Applicant. vs. Shashikant Raghunath Tandel & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr. A.S. Khandeparkar i/by Khandeparkar & Asso. for Applicant. Mr. S.G. Karandikar for respondents. .. CORAM: J.N. PATEL & CORAM: J.N. PATEL & CORAM: J.N. PATEL & A.A. SAYED, JJ. A.A. SAYED, JJ. A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE: 12TH OCTOBER, 2007. DATE: 12TH OCTOBER, 2007. DATE: 12TH OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. . In view of the statements made in paragraphs 4 and 6 of the affidavit in reply, the parties agree that no further orders are necessary to be passed on the civil application and the parties agree to abide by the said understanding. Further, the learned counsel for the respondent makes a statement that except for 2 repairs, no additions or alterations will be carried out in the premises in question. Statement accepted. 2. The civil application stands disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. 3. The parties are at liberty to move the Court if any contingency arises. (J.N. Patel, J. ) (J.N. Patel, J. ) (J.N. Patel, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. )