INCS f •^^•',ft-.^^. tSU! EiAS t^eS ^f-fGoZ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S) No. K^4- 1200^ PETITIONER ^^:..-" ^"'-^.^L--" r" ...•<,^[t. ^c^;''^.1'" >^''^'r>^"" '^A..--" Ad-*'' RESPONDENTS Smt. Pratibha Sahu, W/o. Shri Madan Lal Sahu, aged about 44 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Brindanagar, Camp-1, Bhilai Distt.- Durg (C.G.) VERSUS t 1 S£C^ ^J^O^ so £• ><-u .(9 c^^^.^^ >"lw State of Chhattisgrh, Through - The Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Director, Public Instruction Department, Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur District Education Officer Durg, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Durg Distt. - Durg (C.G.), WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER. HISH COURT OF CHHATraSSARH AT BILASPUR W. P.fS) No. Petitioner : Smt. Pratibha Sahu Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and olhers SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihgtri. J Prssent: Anr. Vipin Tiwari, Advocate for l+ie petitioner. Mr. Satish 6upta, &y. ©ovt. Advocate for the respondents/State. OR &ER (Passed on this 13th Day of February, 2007) 1. The petitioner was appointed on 30.12.84 (Annexure P/l) as Assistont Teacher on fixed pay scale of Rs. 300/-. After comptetion of two years probation, he was 9ranted re9uiar' poy scale of Rs. 545-925/-. 2. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits -t+iat the issue involved in tiie case is asto whether, the petitioner is entitled to re9ular pay scale w.e.f. •rtie date of initia! cppointment or after completion of probstion period. 3. The issue involved, herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (ttadhukont Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. & others), wherein it was held that -riie similarly sstuated teachers are entitled to regular pay scaie w.e.f. the date of initial cippointment. was dismissed by -Ae Hon'bie Supreme Court upholding -the dscision of -the Tribuna! to the effect -Hiat the Teachers/Assistcdt Teachers are entitled to regular poy scate from date of initial cypointment. 4. Lairned counset appearin9 for the petitioner further submits that 1+iis Court, whiie considering the same issue in Aeman Jain ys. The ,State Sovernment of Chhattisgarh & another (W. P. No. 1463/2006) by order dated 10.11.2006, has granted regular pay scaie w.e.f. ths date of initia! appointment. 5. Leamed counsel oppearing for the parties jointiy submit tiioit tiiis case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Aeman Jain vs. "Hie State Sovernment of Chhattisgarh & another (Supra). 6. In view of that, this petition is altowed in -the same terms. No order- as to costs. Sd/- Satish KAgnihotri Judge