^'^^i^ss^^^^^^^^^^^^ /a^. ^plV^ ::t. ^ Petitioner HIGH GOURT OF CHHATTISQARH: BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.335 ofZOOS Saraia Saha, aged 44 years, Lectyrer; W/o. Shri Lalit Kumar Saha, R/p. Boire Dadar Raigarh, D!stt.Raigarh(CG). -••/ Respondents Versus 1) State Government of Ghhattisgarh firough ths Sec.'etary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Distt. Raipur(CG). 2) Principal, Govt. Girls Higliier Secondary School, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh(CG5. 3) District Education (Mcer, Raigarh, Distriet Raigarh ^30). ^/Vrit Petition under Art 226 ofthe Constifartion of India) SB: Hon'bleMr. Satish K.Agnihotri.J. Present: Shri V.K. Pandey, counsetforthepetitioner. Shri Ajay Dwh/edi, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORALORDER (Passed on 17th January, 2008} 1. Learned counsetappearing forthe petltioner asweli asforthe State/respondents jointiy submit tliat the fact and question of iaw involved in the present writpetition are the same to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharatfwai Vs; Mynicipal Corporation, . Durg and another {2006 (U)MPJR -CG 96}, which has disposed of vide order dated 3-4-2006. Leamed eounsel appearing for theTespondentsJdoes not controyert the said submission. Raju 2 \ o 2. Aecordinalv, the writ Defition is allowed in terms of ths order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Duro and another (supra), subjeet to veriflcation of the fact as to "whether the petttioner has acquired B.Ed., Examination Certificate on her own expenses as per the cireulars dated 24-1 2-1M8 and further whether she has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotrilj Judge i;. 1 ; i: