IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 21ST KARTHIKA 1930 W.P(C).No. 33357 of 2008(U) PETITIONERS: 1. M.ABDUL LATHEEF RETIRED SELECTION GRADE LECTURUER IN ARABIC OF GOVERNMENT COLLEGE, CHAVARA,NOW RESIDING AT PANAMOOTTIL, EDAPPALLY KOTTA P.O.,KOLLAM 691 583. 2. B.ANANDAVALLY RETIRED SELECTION GRADE LECTURUER IN HISTORY' OF GOVERNMENT COLLEGE, CHAVARA,NOW RESIDING AT 'CHITHIRA;,KANDALLOOR P.O.,ALAPPUZHA 690 535 3. R.ANANDAN RETIRED SELECTION GRADE LECTURUER IN ENGILISH OF GOVERNMENT COLLEGE, CHAVARA,NOW RESIDING AT NOCHIKKATTIL, VALIYAZHEEKKAL P.O., ALAPPUZHA 690 535 BY ADV. SRI.JOSHI N.THOMAS RESPONDENTS: 1. GOVT. OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION NEW DELHI, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION BAHADUR SHAH SAFAR MARG, NEW DELHI 110002 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, HIGHER EDUCATION (C) DEPARTMENT, TRIVANDRUM, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 4. THE DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION VIKAS BHAVAN, P.M.G. JUNCTION, TRIVANDRUM. 5. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL KERALA TRIVANDRUM. WPC No.33357/2008(U) 6. THE PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT COLLEGE, CHAVARA. GOVT. PLEADER, SRI. A.J. VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 33357 OF 2008 (U) ==================== Dated this the 12th day of November, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioners are retired Selection Grade Lecturers. It is stated that by Ext.P3, those having completed specified length of service in Selection Grade were ordered to be given refixation. Lot of complaints were raised regarding the non implementation of Ext.P3 and that led to Ext.P5 judgment directing refixation of pay as ordered in Ext.P3. 2. Petitioner submits that in order to implement Ext.P5, Ext.P6 circular has been issued, calling for details of the Selection Grade Lecturers. However, complaining that Ext.P6 does not include retired people like the petitioners, they have filed Ext.P7 representation before the 4th respondent. In this writ petition, what is sought for is that the 4th respondent should be called upon to take up, consider and pass orders on Ext.P7. 3. As already noticed, the complaint of the petitioners is that they have been illegally excluded from the purview of Exts. P5 and P6 and they are claiming the benefit of Ext.P3. Now that this complaint has been taken up before the 4th respondent by filing Ext.P7, it is only appropriate that the 4th respondent decides the matter. Therefore, there will be a WPC 33357/08 :2 : direction to the 4th respondent to consider Ext.P7, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 8 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp