1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY PETITION NO.650 OF 2004 Sugam Construction Pvt.ltd. Petitioner versus Quadricon Pvt.Ltd. Respondent Mr.Kishore Jain with Mr.P.V.Shah for petitioner. Mr.Zal Andhyarijina with Mr.Pramod Y. Keni i/by Thakordas Madgaonkar for respondent. CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 3rd December 2010 PC : 1. The above Company Petition was admitted by an order of this Court dated 29th April 2005. Thereafter the petition was advertised in two local newspapers and in the Maharashtra Government Gazette. However, no claims have been received from any of the creditors of the company. The company petition is now taken up for final hearing. 2. The learned advocates appearing for the parties have tendered consent terms and have prayed that the company petition be disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms dated 3rd December 2010. The petition is signed by the petitioner as well as the Directors/Authorized Representatives of the respondent company. The consent terms are also signed by the advocates for the petitioner as well as the advocates for the respondents. The consent terms are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. The company petition is disposed of in terms of consent terms marked “X”. The undertaking given in clause (8) of the consent terms by the respondent to unconditionally withdraw Suit No.2078 of 2002 filed by them against the petitioner is accepted. 2 3. The amounts received by the office of the Sheriff of Mumbai pursuant to the attachment levied under order dated 24th September 2010 from the banks, if any, shall be returned back by the office of the Sheriff of Mumbai to the respective banks for being credited to the accounts of the respondent from which the said amounts were debited by the said banks. 4. The company petition is accordingly disposed of. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.)