IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CRL.P.No.11055 OF 2010 Between:- Mohd. Qayumuddin @ Amjad and 2 others …Petitioners A n d The State of A.P., Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad through W.P.S., CCS DD, Hyderabad and another …Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CRL.P.No.11055 OF 2010 ORDER: Petitioners/A-1 to A-3 and the second respondent-de facto complainant are present. Mr.Syed Ahmed Ali, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.Shaikh Safiullah, learned counsel for the second respondent are present and identified the parties. 2. It is stated by both parties that the matter has been settled out of Court and the second respondent and the first petitioner have been living separately on account of divorce obtained between them and the claims of the second respondent and permanent alimony have been settled by paying Rs.2,75,000/-. The second respondent-de facto complainant stated that she has received the said amount. She further stated that she is not interested in prosecuting the case any more. 3. As the matter between the parties has been settled amicably out of Court and the parties have entered into compromise as per the terms set out therein and the second respondent-complainant received all the amounts due to her in terms of the settlement and as she is not interested in pursuing the complaint given by her, it is considered that no useful purpose would be served by continuing the criminal proceedings against the petitioners/A-1 to A-3. 4. In the circumstances, further proceedings against the petitioners/A-1 to A-3 in C.C.No.369 of 2010, on the file of the XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, are liable to be quashed and they are accordingly quashed. 5. In the result, the criminal petition is disposed of. _____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 12th November, 2010 Lrkm.