IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 181 of 2011 Decided on: 28.6.2011 Neena Sharma …Petitioner Versus Shri P.C. Kapoor and others …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioners : Mr. S.C. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondent No.1 None for respondents No. 2 and 3. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : In view of the contents of Annexure R-2, dated 12.10.2007, no contempt is made out against the respondents. Consequently, the notices are discharged. However, it shall be open to the petitioner to make a representation in accordance with law for the redressal of remaining grievances. 2. In view of the observations made hereinabove, the present contempt petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge June 28, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?