IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. -M No. 22200 of 2011 (O&M) Balbir Singh .. Petitioner v. State of Punjab .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Raj Karan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.S. Bajwa, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. ... Rajesh Bindal J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is working as a travel agent. He was to arrange work permit and visa for the complainant in Singapore, which was arranged. The complainant was sent to Singapore, however, she returned back after one week. In fact, she had been granted work permit from 20.11.2010 to 19.1.2013. After coming back, the present FIR was got registered. The petitioner was arrested on 9.5.2011 and is in custody since then. Learned counsel for the State submitted that the complainant had been promised permanent visa. The same having been not arranged by the petitioner, she was cheated. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the contentions raised, in my opinion, the petitioner deserves concession of bail pending trial. He is directed to be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Gurdaspur. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 26.8.2011/mk