IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 625 of 2010 Date of decision: 22.07.2011 Rahtu Lal ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana etc. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. Naveen Daryal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH J. The petitioner has approached this Court through present writ petition for quashing the recovery order dated 31.12.2009, which according to him, amounted to ` 14,000/- . Notice of motion was issued and the reply has been filed. A detailed reasoning has been given in the reply giving clear picture in this regard. Thereafter, the respondents have clearly given that till date no recovery proceedings have been started against the petitioner and the Accountant General, Haryana had been requested to cancel the order directing recovery, if any. It is, accordingly, stated that the present writ petition is not maintainable and the same is liable to be dismissed. Once no recovery has been ordered and even if some process is on to recovery the amount, the same is likely to be withdrawn, no cause is left to agitate in the petition. The insistence of the counsel in regard to the fixation of pension was totally Civil Writ Petition No. 625 of 2010 -2- misconceived and misleading as no such prayer is contained in the writ petition. Dismissed. July 22, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH) rts JUDGE