ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 2403 OF 2008 PETITION NO. 2403 OF 2008 PETITION NO. 2403 OF 2008 Thoralikamlabai Revansiddha Yedur ...Petitioner Vs. Rajaram Pandurang Nakka & Anr. ...Respondents. Mr.A.S.Kulkarni for the Petitioner. Mr.Shrishail Sakhare for Respondent Nos.1(a) to 1(e). CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 01st October, 2008. : 01st October, 2008. : 01st October, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. . This is a Writ Petition filed by the landlords challenging the impugned order dated 7th February, 2008, whereby, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned Trial Judge has granted an application under Order I Rule 10 (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short, "CPC") and thereby an Intervention Application filed by the legal heirs of the original tenants are brought on record as defendants. There is no dispute that there is another suit filed by the same landlords for the same property against these interveners along with original tenants on the ground of sub-tenancy. There is material on ( 2 ) record to show that the original tenant is not available for more than 7 years. The proceedings are also pending to that effect. Therefore, as rightly observed, for proper adjudication it is necessary to grant such application. 2. In view of this, there is nothing in this Writ Petition. The Petition is, accordingly dismissed. ( ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)