IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 7356 of 2008. Decided on: 09.12.2010. ___________________________________________________ Raj Kumar. … Petitioner. Versus H.R.T.C. & others … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : None. For the Respondents : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): Petitioner has already filed an appeal against recovery of ` 33,333/-(Thirty three thousand three hundred and thirty three) vide Annexure A on 10th May, 2001. The said appeal has not been decided by the Appellate Authority. Consequently the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to Appellate Authority to decide the appeal by passing a speaking order within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment. Since, the petitioner is not present nor represented by any counsel, therefore, Corporation shall inform the petitioner about the judgment. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 09, 2010. (priti)