IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2182 OF 2005 Mrs.Sumanagala Ramesh Satte & Anr. ...Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... Mr.A.H.Patil for Applicants. Mr.A.S.Gadkari, A.P.P. for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. APRIL 26, 2005. APRIL 26, 2005. APRIL 26, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. Perused the record. 2. I see no reason to depart from the conclusion reached by the lower Court in rejecting the Anticipatory Bail Application preferred by the present Applicants, having regard to the seriousness of the offence and material on record to indicate the complicity of the Applicants. The suicide note names the Applicants. Besides the : 2 : suicide note, the statements of the father, mother and sister of the deceased also support the prosecution case, which indicate the complicity of the Applicants. If it is so, not a case for anticipatory bail. Hence, dismissed. 3. The Applicants are, however, granted limited protection to surrender before the appropriate Court on or before 3rd May 2005 and apply for regular bail if so advised, failing which, it will be open to the Investigating Officer to proceed against the Applicants, in accordance with law. 4. In the meantime, as condition for the limited protection, the Applicants shall report to the Investigating Officer daily from tomorrow between 3.00 p.m. to 5.00 p.m. or such other time or place, as may be required by the Investigating Officer and co-operate with the investigation of the case. On failure to comply with this condition, it will be open to the Investigating Officer to proceed against the Applicants in accordance with law. : 3 : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.