IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN THURSDAY, THE 19TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 28TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 33193 of 2009(T) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- K.P. RAMMOHAN, S/O. PREMACHANDRAN UNNI, DEVAKI PADMANABHAN, OLD DESAM ROAD, THOTTAKATTUKARA.P.O, ALUVA - 683 103, DISTRICT ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. MR.K.REGHU KOTTAPPURAM RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENJIPALAM, KOZHIKODE, MALAPPURAM. 2. THE REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENJIPALAM, KOZHIKODE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY MR.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = W.P.(C). No. 33193 OF 2009 = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = Dated this the 19th day of November 2009. JUDGMENT The petitioner appeared for the third semester supplementary B.Tech degree Examination in Mechanical Engineering conducted by the University of Calicut in December 2008. The results were published on 08.10.2009. The petitioner again failed in the paper Machine Drawing. He has therefore applied for revaluation of his answer script by submitting Ext.P2 application dated 12.10.2009. It is stated that the requisite fee was also paid. The petitioner submits that, he had done well in the examination, that he has passed all the other semester examinations, that he has also passed the Graduate Aptitude Test in Engineering with a score of 87.9% and that in such circumstances, unless his answer script is expeditiously revaluated, he will put to serious prejudice. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to expeditiously revalue his answer script. Sri. P.C.Sasidharan, the learned standing counsel appearing for the University of Calicut submits that if the petitioner's application for revaluation is in order, the University W.P.(C). No. 33193 OF 2009 2 will take steps to revalue the answer script and communicate the result to him expeditiously. In the light of the said submission, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to take steps to have the petitioner's answer script described in Ext.P2 application revalued and to communicate the result to him expeditiously and, in any event, within eight weeks from the date on which the petitioner produces a certified copy of this judgment before the first respondent. (P.N.RAVINDRAN) JUDGE kkms/