IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. App. No. 170 of 2008 Shyam Sunder S/o Deep Chand, R/o Flat No. 20, Pocket-8, Sector 12, Dwarika, New Delhi. ............. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand. 2. Punit Kumar Mittal S/o Vipin Mittal, R/o Arya Nagar, Near Vadera Nursing Home, Jwalapur, P.S. Jwalapur, District Haridwar. 3. Rajesh Gupta Diamond (Vedic City), Proprietor Rajesh Buildcone & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., 4781/23, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, Delhi. .......... Respondents Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Government Advocate for respondent No. 1. Hon'ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner and upon going through the impugned order dated 11.01.2008 passed by the learned C.J.M. Haridwar as well as the earlier orders passed by him as well as the learned revisional court, I feel convinced that there is no error of law or fact in the impugned order because, indeed, the subject matter of the dispute between the petitioner and respondents Nos. 2 & 3 was purely of civil nature and cognizance under the penal law could not and ought not have been taken. The learned C.J.M., therefore, has rightly dismissed the complaint. No interference is warranted. The petition is dismissed in limine. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 12.03.2008 G