t^^. y'...<:'Sy'j.-:-"^..--^"' ..•-^''^•^:^" N^^A-*--" c ^> SN THB HZGH GX3URT Q^ JUDSCATXT1 SINGLEBENCH ATT ?S?T."a PBTITIONBR erssvs&.'p^vsse^Q.'ss' ^/£S£S^» * ^- S.iSSuifSnE^El. W.P. N0. t ,'200i Shatrughan Prasad Gupta, Aged about 42 VTS, S/o. Sar^u Fi'a.sad Oupta, R/o. DaiTipara; Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.O.j - ^€-'f ^^1 ^" VBKSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Regional Transport Authorily, Bilaspui", District Bilaspur (C.G.) Mohu. Alini S,/o. Late Hazi Mohd. Ayuf, Aged about 38 years, R/o. Kharsiya Nfeika; ATEibikapur; Distt. Surguja. (C.O.) WRIT PBTITION UND@l ARTICI.E 226/227 0V THE CONSTITUTION OF INSIA V3. RESPONDENTS 1. 2. HIOH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHAmSOARH : BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH: HON'BLESHRI S.R. NAYAK, C.J. WRITreTmONNO.18 OF 2006 PETITIONER Shatrughan Prasad Gupta, Aged about 42 years, S/o Saraju Prasad Gupta, R/o Darripara, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Mohd. Alim, S/o Late Hazi Mohd. Ayuf, Aged about 38 years, R/o Kharsiya Nata, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) Present: Mr. Vaibhav A. Goverdhan, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Yashwant Singh, Government Advocate for respondent No.l/State. ORALORDER (Passed on 4th January, 2006) For more than one reason. 1 am not inclined to entertain this writ petition. In the first instance, it needs to be noticed that thevery period of tsmporary permit granted in favour of second responclent spent itself on 31st December, 2005. Secondly, against the impugned order, a statutory appeal lies under Section 89 of the Motor Vehictes Act, 1988. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed, however, no order as to costs. Sd/. ^. Naya^ chiefJustice G.Singh ^M^gSsauaHiia'nsasawuil^- 'f^|