IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY, THE 22ND JULY 2008 / 31ST ASHADHA 1930 CRP.No. 128 of 2008() --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 27/07/2006 IN EP. 4 /2003 IN LAR.1/1999 of SUB COURT,THODUPUZHA .................... REVN. PETITIONER: JUDGMENT DEBTOR: -------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.R.BINDU. RESPONDENTS: DECREE HOLDERS; ------------------ 1. THOMAS, S/O. MATHEW, KONDAMALAYIL HOUSE, KARIMANNOOR KARA, KARIMANNOOR VILLAGE. 2. SUSAMMA, W/O. THOMAS, KONDAMALAYIL HOUSE, KARIMANNOOR KARA, KARIMANNOOR VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.VIDYASAGAR FOR R1 & 2 SRI.T.I.ABDUL SALAM FOR R1 & 2 THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J. ------------------------------- C.R.P.No.128 of 2008 ------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd July, 2008. O R D E R Even though revision was filed challenging the order dated, 27.7.2006, in the year 2008, the sale was confirmed as early as in 2006. Therefore, the order dated, 27.7.2006 cannot be interfered. The remedy of the State was to get the sale set aside, either under Rule 89 or 90 of Code of Civil Procedure. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that respondents-decree holders/auction purchasers are prepared to re-convey the property, if the State deposits the entire amount due to the respondents under the decree, including the interest, cost and expenses. Recording the said submission, revision petition is closed. M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE nj.