^_1HE_HIOi COLRT OF_JUDK;AT E AT_BIL^^ LC*G^) M.A.NO. lf-°-..^/2003. ( APPEAX. VALb-ED AT RS. 25 ,000/-) ^FTE^L__U/ls__173_OF THE MOT^CE VEHlCI£S_^T^ 19^8^ APPELLANT NON-APPL]C^TT No«3 United' India Insurance Company Limitedi Through: Its Dxvisional Manager Divisional Office- Main Road Koitoa, Taho& Dist-b. KCRBA (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS (APPLIC^TS) '•1^*' '^' .^^ ^'^: :.^ ^y <^ 0<sJ2^ !• Smto Mamta Bishnoi w/o A»K<»Bishnoi aged- 40 years , R/o Sindiai colony^ Janjgir, Tah and Distt.- Janjgir-Champa(CG) 2. Sinil Yadav s/o Shankar lal / Yadav» aged 23 years , R/o Chandaniya para- Janjgir, Tah,& Dis-b-be- Janjgir- Champa (C«G.)(Driver) 3« ShivNarayan Tamboli s/o Shri Bhuneshwar Prasad T^oli, aged 24 years, R/o Chandaniyapara Janjgir T^»& Dis-b-t, Janjgir-Champa (C.G.)(OwRer) Being aggrieved by the interim award/order dated 17-09-2003 passed in ciaim case No. 78/03 (between the parties ^Srnt^ Mamta Bishnoi Vs^ Sunil Yadav & ors<) by Ad^ltional Motor Accident claims Tribunal, KORBA (C^G^), appellant prefers -i±iis appeal on the follaving facts and grounds:- FX;TS OF__ _THE,__C_ASE ^_.; XI-HC-22 ~3~5? ^l<4l<rl^, °3':'Bt?FTS, fa<rtl^^< 3ffi^r ^^K ...u±:...<\^?.., HT<<^T( 5SW^ ^ 2003 'fN^T' ^I^T^T R;iicb ^n^i $b^i<=h ^-n ^ ^T^T'^nw^rf^T 08.1,2004 Shri Dashratli Gupta, counsep. for Uie appeUant. Hearcl, The appcllaiit has filcd this t=hi^t<n<iiri TTR^f!f"? f^st <PIi'^i< ^? ^rf^R^n^i appeal s-gaiiist the award clated 17.9.2003 passed by tlie Addl. l^otor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ambikapur iii Claim Case IJMO,78/2003 graiitmg mterim coiiipensation towai'ds no fault liabpitv, Brief facts of the case sjre fhat the offendiag vehicle (Malicndra Jcep) bearing Rcgfi,No.C^,G, ll/SD/0705 wa^ io.volvcd iu an accident occuiTed 011 24.11,200|2 where respondent no.l uamety Smt, Mainta Bishnoi sustaiiied fractui'ed, She was adraitted ia luijuries and her left rib was the hospital, The niatter was reported to the PoUce Out-post Ur^. aiid CriiDie No. 192 of 2003 was regiBtered fcsr tlie offeuce^ puuishal 338 IPC. Respondent no,l filed claiijti case and fiie leanied Tribunal Bv impugned order fastened tlie lia^iltty on the InsurEm.ee Conrpany axid held fhat the said vehicle w£| tearo.cd Tribuiial wliile holduig s ow^ued by rcspondent 3io,3 aad ms^ircd by appellao.t/iipu-appticao.t uo.3 aad ou account of rash aad ] no,2 , the said Uie ^ehicte niet thj nistauied injuries ajid her feft rib ^as fractured. \)lc undcr ^ectloiis 279, 337 ajid Is invol^ed in the accident The :}','• opincd that Uic vehk;k was uegligent drivmg by respondent e accident aiid respondent no. 1 /•-^ [Tit^ ^Pa^ XI-HC-22 ^^ ^WW^, '^tWTS, F^W^y. ani^r ^[^K ^..^^0 - C\^Q Hl*<<?11 'g^^'"—•••—•*———'——"^p^ 200 3 fcl-b^ STT^T^r f<^i?h ^(t?T ^^-[T^^T^Cl + J&, f^>f 'STT^T "^n^ ^TT -^- Haviag cousidered the facts ^iid niaterial 011 record, there is no (yarraiitiiig iaterference by this Cozir^. However^ erids of justice wiU piat tlie owner to fmnish an mdei|iiiity ^ase it is held tliat the msuraiice ^wuer \viil nideiaii^, The clainis Tribuusil shsiU al^ ^7bile decidlng tlic case cn iiicrits a| ^egai'dmg restitution from tlie own^ ^nses, The aiiiount so deposited und^ l^e withdrawn by the claioiaiit on fui|n.ish It is madc clcar that tlie ciaiiol 4-1-^/-. 14/^'S~.41^ ^.pn its o^ ^w^w^7 ^<%^^ -'d[W»-^^' The appe^l is disposed ofwil Accordiagly, M. C. P. No. 1689 o Certi&ed Copy as per rules. <=hl^?€>1<<1<1 ^I^QlI "? FG^ iPsl^K ^^Tf^FT 377^1 aiid circumstances of the case iiifiroiity iii the inipugned order be served if a direction is giveu bond to Uie effect that m ^ompaiiy is not Uable fhen tlie o consider the. question raised ^id wiil pass apprbpriate oidcrs ?r m case sucli aa eventuality ^r 110 fault llaLbility be sdlo^ved to ^.ishtng seczirity. |s Tribunal shall decicle the casc iiicrits ,m,4cco.ydao.c€wiUi law^\^^\^^ y\&^u.^ lii'^'ii'-Sy ($y<J^<- <^ ' (' the directioii aioresaid, 2003 also stands disposed of Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [^t^ ^Pa^