IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40586 of 2008 1. RAM PUKAR RAI 2. Ram Prakash Rai @ Lalu Rai All are sons of Laxmi Rai, R/o- Village – Ratanpur, P.S. – Sakra, District - Muzaffarpur Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 11.12.2008 Heard the parties, Mr. Mani Bhushan Kumar learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this application petitioner no.2, Ram Prakash Rai @ lalu Rai has been arrested as such, application against him has become infructuous. Accordingly, the application against petitioner no. 2 is dismissed as infructuous. Petitioners are accused in a case for the offence registered under Sections 306 and 34 of the Indian Penal code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that deceased had died on account of minor difference in the family because she wants to go to Maika during the Chath Festival and that was objected by the petitioner. As such, she committed suicide. Learned counsel for the State is not in a position to refute the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions as made above, it is directed that in the - 2 - event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, namely, Ram Pukar Rai be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sakra P.S. Case No. 314 of 2007 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Jagdish (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)