^^^^^ .^esi-^ /c? COURT OF CHHATT!SGARH: BILASPUR Writ PetjtionCSiNo.418 of 2008 Petitioners 1) Smt. Anisha Gardia, W/o. Shn Dsepak Gardla, age about 38 years, Asslstant Teacher, GovS. Middie Schooi, Potiyadih, Distt. Dhamtari (CG). 2) Smt. K. Saraswati, W/o. Shri K. Subramanyam, Age about 39 ysars, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Boys IViJddle Schooi, Potiyadln, Dlstt, Dhamtarl (CG). Respondents Versus 1) Government of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Educatjon & Tribai Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Ralpur (CG). 2) Dlstrict Education Officer, Distt. Dhamatari (CG). (Writ Petition under Art 226 of the Constttution of India) Present: SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Shri Verma, for the Shri Satlsh Gupta, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. (Passed on 22nd January. Learned counsei appearing for the petltloners as wel! as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the fact ana' question of !aw involved In the oresent writ petition are the same to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs« • Mynlclpal Corporation, Durg and another {2006 (II) ^PJR -CG 96), whlch has been disposed of vlde order dated 3-4-2006. Learned counsei appearing for the respondents does not controvert the said submlssson. 2. Accordingly, the writ petltion Is aliowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kuiiiar Bharadwaj Vs. Myniclpai Corporatlon, Durg and another (supra), subject to veriflcation of the fact as to whether the petitloners have acquired B.Ed., Examination Certlflcate cn their own expenses as per the circuiars dated 24-12-1998 and further whether they have been paid two advance Increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge Raju