1 C.P.330.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 330 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6568 OF 2010 Nintin Ashokrao Jogdand ...PETITIONER VERSUS M/s Gajanan Oil Agency, and others. ...RESPONDENTS ... Mr.V.A.Bagal,Advocate for petitioner. Mr.D.V.Tele,A.G.P. for respondent-State. ... CORAM: S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 5TH OCTOBER, 2011 PER COURT : . Heard. 2. This contempt petition alleges disobedience/breach/contempt of the order dated 1st October, 2010, passed by the learned Division Bench of this Court, in Writ Petition NO. 6568 of 2010. The order of the learned Division Bench of this Court reads thus: 2 C.P.330.11 1. The limited relief claimed in these petitions is that the respondent NO.4 be directed to decide the revision petition of the petitioners within a stipulated period. 2. The petitions are disposed of with direction to respondent NO.4 to decide the revision petitions filed by the petitioners within a period of four months from today after giving an opportunity of hearing to all the concerns. . Though, the learned Division Bench of this Court directed the original respondent i.e. the Minister, Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 to decide the revision petition filed by the respective petitioners within a period of four months from 1st October, 2010, admittedly their revision petitions are not yet decided. 3. Learned AGP, on instructions, submits that 3 C.P.330.11 on 24.08.2011, the revision petitions were placed for hearing. However, the petitioner and respondent NO.1 did not attend the proceedings on the said date. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the notice of said hearing was served on the petitioner on 23.08.2011 at 11.00 p.m. on his residential address, at village in Taluqa Partur, District Jalna, which is about 500 k.m. away from Mumbai. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, notice of hearing of revision petition needs to be given at least three days in advance. 4. Learned AGP on written instructions from Under Secretary, Food, Civil and Consumer Protection Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai makes a statement that next date of hearing will be communicated to the petitioner well in advance and revision petition will be decided within two months from today. 5. In the light of written communication 4 C.P.330.11 received by the learned AGP from the concerned Department, which is taken on record and marked as Exhibit “X” for identification purpose, nothing further survives for consideration in the present Contempt Petition and the same stands disposed off. Notice stands discharged. . However, it is made clear that, in case the revision petition is not decided within two months from today, liberty to the petitioner to review this Contempt Petition. Sd/- [S.S. SHINDE, J.] MTK