1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NOS. 853 OF 2000 & 1715 OF 2001 M.S. R. T. C. Yavatmal Vs. Rupchand Mohanlal Meshram & Ors. Ratnamala wd/o Rupchand Meshram & Ors. Vs. M. S. R. T. C. Yavatmal ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. A. S. Mehadia Adv for petitioner. Mr. S. T. Harkare Adv for respondents. CORAM: K. U. CHANDIWAL J. DATED: 21 st JULY, 2010. Heard. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation feels aggrieved by the directions of the reinstatement of the respondent Assistant Traffic Superintendent (ATS) in employment with it. On perusal of the findings recorded by the learned Member Industrial Court Yavatmal, I do not find any error apparent to call interference. Added to it is, the 2 respondent Rupchand is no more . Any effect of the order of reinstatement now will not survive. Consequently Writ Petition has become infructuous. It is accordingly disposed of. Rule discharged No costs. WRIT PETITION NO. 1715 of 2001: By Writ Petition No. 1715 of 2001 legal representatives of the employee Ruphand have urged for grant of the 50% back wages, which the learned Member Industrial Court Maharashtra Yavatmal by order dated 9th December 2009 did not entertain. Since 50% of the back wages is received, I do not see calling for any interference in the order of the learned Member, Industrial Court. Writ Petition lacks merits. It is accordingly disposed of. Rule discharged. JUDGE svk 3