THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2611 of of 2009 ORDER: The petitioners feel aggrieved by a notice, dated 27.01.2009, issued by the Tahsildar, Eluru Mandal, West Godavari District, the third respondent herein, under Section 7 of A.P. Land Encroachment Act, 1905. The petitioners state that the notice is untenable in law and contrary to the prescribed procedure. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue. On an earlier occasion, the petitioners have approached this Court by filing W.P.No.15957 of 2008 complaining that the respondents are trying to dispossess them without initiating any proceedings, in accordance with law. The writ petition was disposed of, leaving it open to the respondents therein to follow the due process of law, while evicting the petitioners from the land in question. It is in this context that the impugned notice was issued. Even assuming that the notice is defective in any manner, the petitioners have to point out the same in their reply. It is not even alleged that the third respondent does not have the jurisdiction to issue notice. The question of interfering with the show cause notice would arise, if only, it is issued by an authority not vested with the powers. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioners to submit explanation, within one (1) week from today. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:12.02.2009 kdl