G-^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION fS^NO. f <^) OF 2011 ^^y .l£s-1' 'N^:l ...^ RESPONDENTS ^' ^ PETITIONER : / Vijay Kumar Dhruv, Son of Shri Sadaram, aged about 48 years, Posted as Headmaster, Primary School, Kusumkunda, Block Lormi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS . / 1. State of Chhattisgarh: Through: the Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^2. DirectorPublicInstructions,Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ^3. District Education Officer, Bilaspur, . District Bilaspur (C.G.) /4. Block Education Officer, Lormi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ^5. Block Education Officer, Masturi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OFTHE PETITIONER - As given in the cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS As given in the cause title. 3. PARTICULARS OF THE CAUSE/ORDER AGAINST WHICH THE PETITION IS MADE -BC-22 3:ni?i^i l<<-ii.«(i sil^l shiif ^iiia Dsepti + ^ ^er ^|i||<rl^, ^Tllyre. facii'ay 3TI^9T_lRra? i§.l^..:.l^ ftre^sr' W*<?fTtbHiq» 200 311^1 TOIIW ^lfgtl SB: Hon'bleShri Manindra Bflohata Shrivastava. J 10-01-2011 beriefits ifi Shri P.P.Sahu, counsel for tl-le Shri N.N.Roy, Panet Lawyer Heard. Learned counsel for the issue with regard to entitlement decrded by this Court in the ca^e petitioner is not being granted and he has undergone Diploma i(i Board of Secondary Education) submits that his case is squarely) Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj and a|; of Gopesh Kumar Verma v. Th^ another'm W.P.(s) No.4130/05 decitted Leamed State counsel duly considered inthe light of the j4d81' ofpetitioner's entittement. Accordingly, it is directed th^t the petitioner, the same shail b^ Education officer, Bilaspur and the| ftree months from the date of receifct With the aforesaid observati4ns. petitioner. fortheState. subnlite cfiT^'fll *11+iClT "^ TS^ <f^-^l< ^7 SlPgi 3D^?I p^titioner-submitted that even though the lof two additionai incremente has been oi Yashwant Kumar Bhaiadhvaj, the even though he is similarty situated Education (two yeare course from the ^nd successfulty passed th? same. He covered by the decision in the case of |so order passed by this Court in the case State Govemnwnt of Chha sgarh and lon 15/12/06. that the case of the petitionerwould be j4dgment of this Court after due verification it after detailed representation is made i>y considered by respondent No.3/Distrlct same shail be decided within a period of ofcopyofthisorder. the peUtion is finally disposed off. Sd/- ^anindra Mohan Shrivastasa Jut^e