IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50369 of 2007 SURENDRA MANDAL & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 6. 6.8.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State as well as opposite party no.2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with C.R. No.528/2006 for the alleged offences registered under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Submissions are that the complaint has been filed for ulterior purposes. There is no specific allegation against the petitioners who are the in-laws. As a matter of fact, the allegation is against the husband. The complainant had filed a matrimonial case for maintenance against her husband. However, later on the same was compromised vide order dated 15.2.2007 passed in Matrimonial Case No.16/06/238/06. A certified copy of the said order dated 15.2.2007 has been produced by the learned counsel for the petitioners. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant, on the other hand, submits 2 that the petitioners, who are the members of the in-laws family of the complainant, used to harass her and as such the present complaint has been filed. Considering the submissions, as noticed above, it is directed that petitioners no.1 to 4, namely, Surendra Mandal, Gangai Mandal, Rabindra Kumar Mandal @ Ravindra Mandal and Phulo Devi, respectively, in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with C.R. no.528/2006 (T.R. No.1795/2007), within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jhanjharpur, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub- section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)