IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11768 of 2008 ANJANI KUMAR . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2. 3.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the writ application has become infructuous inasmuch as the suspension has been revoked and departmental proceedings concluded. The petitioner proposes to question the punishment in another fresh application. He however limits his submission in the present application to contend that he has learnt that his suspension was in fact revoked on 22.2.2010 but he has been made aware by the respondents only on 29.7.2010. The petitioner is therefore entitled for his salary from the date after revocation of the suspension. In absence of the necessary documentary evidence being brought on record by the petitioner in support of the submission, this Court finds it difficult to pass any positive order. The writ application having become infructuous on other aspects. It is disposed with the 2 observation that if the petitioner represents for his salary from February, 2010 when the suspension is stated to have been revoked, the authorities are required to consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Needless to state that if the respondents find any justification in the claim or any part of the claim, all necessary consequential orders shall be issued within the same period. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)