IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25347 of 2010 MAHADEO DAS, S/O LATE SAHTU DAS ……PETITIONER Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 10.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Allegation regarding abuse in the name of informant’s caste is submitted in the side of Panchayat Bhaban and about defalcation of the Government money, informant’s counsel as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor failed to point out the work not done by petitioner. While the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that informant’s grievance was not allotting the work to her, which was not possible due to allotment of the same through lottery system. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that in appointment of Panchayat Sikshak forged certificate was produced by informant’s son was not ignored by the petitioner. Further thump impression on blank paper if was obtained is not use 2 anywhere. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No. 254 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Bhardwaj ( Mandhata Singh, J.)