IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.2084 of 2010 Date of Decision : 29.3.2010 Gurdial Singh ....Petitioner Versus Kirpal Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr. Mansur Ali, Advocate for Mr.K.D.Sachdeva, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the impugned order, I am of the opinion that the instant revision petition can be disposed of at this stage without issuance of notice of motion to the respondents as resorting to this process is likely to delay the proceedings further. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order by which his evidence has been closed. The court while passing the impugned order has observed that 11 opportunities had been granted to the petitioner before closing his evidence. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that on few occasions the matter was referred to the Lok Adalat and the case was also transferred to some other court which has resulted in wastage of few opportunities granted to the petitioner C.R.No.2084 of 2010 -2- to lead his evidence. Having regard to the fact that the petitioner is a claimant in a M.A.C.T. case and he is said to have suffered some disability and also noticing the fact that some opportunities granted to the petitioner have been wasted in the process stated above, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the present petition by setting aside the impugned order subject to payment of Rs.500/- as costs. The trial court is directed to afford one effective opportunity to the petitioner to conclude his evidence. It is made clear that no further opportunity shall be granted to the petitioner to adduce his evidence. Disposed of. 29.3.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss