1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD C.A.No.3614/2009 In CA St.No.6867/09 In W.P.No. 3222/2006. ___________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _______________________|___________________________________ 1. Heard. 2. The Respondent Nos.2 and 3 have died during pendency of the petition. There appears delay caused in filing of the application for substitution of the L.Rs. The delay seems to be due to lack of knowledge about death of the Respondent Nos.2 and 3. It is explicit that the deaths of Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are not notified since the matter is at the peremptory stage. The petitioner filed application after he came to know about death of Respondent Nos.2 and 3. The L.Rs. have not opposed the application, since they have remained absent though served. 3. Since the delay is properly explained, the same is condoned in the interest of justice. The L.Rs. are allowed to be taken on record by setting aside the abatement. 4. Both the applications are allowed. (V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) Dt.09.06.2009. asp/office/Ca3614.09