WP(C) 3115/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Handique, learned State counsel appearing for the respondents. The petitioner by the present petition has challenged the notice dated 2 8.01.2010 issued by the office of the Deputy Commissioner, Kamrup(M), asking the petitioner to vacate the land measuring 14 bighas 1 katha 4 lechas in Dag No.10 of village Panikhaiti under Mouza-Beltola in the district of Kamrup, Assam, whi ch is admittedly a Government land and under possession of the petitioner. The g round on which the said notice has been put to challenge is that the petitioner has been possessing the said land on the basis of the transfer of possessory rig ht by one Smt. Sima Pandey in the year 1992 and which is contiguous to the land used for brick kiln industry. Admittedly the aforesaid land is a Government land and the petitioner is not a landless person. The aforesaid land measuring 14 bighas 1 katha 4 lechas, which according to the petitioner is a ceiling surplus land and hence the Gover nment land, cannot therefore be settled in favour of the petitioner, which land is required to be settled in terms of the land policy of the Govt. of Assam as w ell as the Assam Land and Revenue Regulation apart from the provisions of the Ce iling Act, with the deserving persons. That being the position, I do not find any illegality in issuing the not ice of eviction directing the petitioner to vacate the land. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. Interim order passed earlier stands vacated.