IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-2615 of 2011 Date of Decision: November 22, 2011 Satpal .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & another .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. B.S. Dhillon, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sukhvinder Singh Nara, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Vivek Goel, Advocate, for respondent No.2. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. prays for quashing complaint No.292 of 2005 dated 13.8.2005 (Annexure P-2) under Sections 307, 506, 34 IPC, pending in the Court of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pehowa. 2. Learned counsel respondent No.2 contends that entire evidence has been concluded. The case is at argument stage. Crl. Misc. No. M-2615 of 2011 [2] 3. Having considered the statement given on behalf of respondent No.2, I am of the considered opinion that trial having been virtually concluded, it would not be appropriate for this Court to interfere under Section 482 Cr.P.C. 4. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of. (AJAI LAMBA) November 22, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?