IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11396 of 2010 RAJESH SAHANI SON OF BIRBAL SAHANI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.4.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 33, 41, 42 of the I.P.C. and 2, 17, 27, 29, 31 and 51 of Wild Life Protection Act. The petitioner was released on bail by the Court below on condition that the bailor shall be Indian and a government employee. Since the petitioner could not furnish a government employee as a bailor, he has not been released on bail and the petition for charge of condition was also dismissed by the Court below. The petitioner is ready to give two local bailors and one of the bailor will be his own father, so let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5000/- (Five thousand) with three sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Bagha, District-West Champaran in I.F. Case No. 339/2009, subject to the conditions (i) one of the bailor will be the father of the petitioner and the other two bailor will be local. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail, (iii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the - 2 - petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iv) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. MKchy ( Anjana Prakash, J. )