IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28707 of 2008 SANTOSH KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 29.09.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. This Court has gone through the allegations under Section 47-A of the Excise Act and the materials noticed during investigation from the impugned order of rejection. This Court on application of mind considering the allegation of recovery of illicit liquor from the backyard of the house of the petitioner when he is alleged to have escaped, is not persuaded that present is a fit case for the privilege of anticipatory bail. This application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner shall be considered by the court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)