TA No. 416 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH TA No. 416 of 2010 Date of decision January 4, 2011 Nitu Bala ....... Petitioner Versus Hari Chand ........Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. R. P. Singh , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G. S. Pannu, Advocate for the respondent. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. The application is filed at the instance of the wife seeking for transfer of proceedings which are pending at Chandigarh. Learned counsel states that she resides at Gurdaspur and she is HIV positive and it is no easy for her to travel a long distance about 250 K. Ms and even her application for maintenance has not been so far complied with. On the other hand, it is pleaded that husband is working as a driver in a government transport undertaking and it will not be inconvenient for the husband to come to Gurdaspur since he has relatives in Gurdaspur and he often comes at Gurdaspur. 2. Having regard to the peculiar health condition of the petitioner, I am of the view that it would be appropriate and just that the case which is pending before the Court at Chandigarh is withdrawn and to TA No. 416 of 2010 2 be transferred to the District Court at Gurdaspur. 3. The application is allowed accordingly. Parties shall appear before the MACT, Panckula on 31.1.2011. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE January 4, 2011 archana