1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICTION NO. 542 of 2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 574 OF 2009 Balu S. Nirbhavane and others .. Applicants V/s The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents Shri Hemant Vadke alongwith Kapil Dave for the Applicant Mrs. S. V. Gagare, APP for the Respondent-State CORAM: MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATED: 15th October, 2009 P. C. 1. Heard. 2. The applicant accused have preferred revision challenging the order by the learned Special Judge under TADA Act, Greater Bombay, dated 13.8.2006, dismissing the appeal. The applicants accused are convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 323, read with Section 114 and Section 354 read with Section 114 of the Indian Penal Code and maximum sentence is awarded i.e. six months rigorous imprisonment. 3. Pending admission of the Revision, the applicants are granted temporary bail of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with one surety of like amount. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant accused prays that temporarily, cash bail be accepted. 2 5. The accused are allowed to furnish cash bail of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand ) each temporarily. 6. The Applicant Accused to furnish surety within three weeks. 7. The Bail application is disposed of accordingly. (MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.) jpc/-