IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24675 of 2010 Md.Anamul Haque, son of Md. Jamal Mistry, resident of Mohalla- Paliganj, Near New Masjid, P.S. –Paliganj, District-Patna. …….Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ….. Opposite Party. ----------- 03/ 12.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is an accused for offences punishable under Sections 20 and 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no incriminating article has been recovered from his possession, rather the allegation is that 5 kg of Charas was recovered from a co-accused lady Pratima Devi. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that petitioner has got no criminal antecedents and he is in custody since 3.1.2010 although another co-accused Rajesh Kumar has been enlarged on bail by a bench of this court vide order dated 24.08.2010 passed in Cr.Misc.no.23587 of 2010. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let petitioner, namely Md. Anamul Haque be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 1st Additional District Judge, Vaishali in connection with Sonepur (Hazipur) Rail P.S.Case No.01 of 2010, subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how - 2 - he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the father of the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Sunil (S. N. Hussain, J.)