IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Revision No. 85 of 2009 Jagdish Prasad …… Revisionist Versus Hemchandra Arya and another …… Respondents …….. Hon’ble V.K. GUPTA, C. J. After hearing Mr. Nand Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and on going through the impugned Judgment dated 22.05.2009 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Nainital and the Judgment dated 04.11.2008 passed by the learned Trial Magistrate, I find that the offence U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act against the petitioner stood proved beyond any doubt. Both the Courts below have concurrently held that the cheque, which was bounced was issued by the petitioner in discharge of the existing liability. Both the Courts below have also concurrently held that a valid notice was served upon the petitioner on behalf of respondent no. 1 and yet within the time stipulated and prescribed, the amount was not paid by the petitioner. No interference is called for. The revision petition is dismissed in limine. (V. K. Gupta, C.J.) 10.06.2009 A