?PEL "AANT' 3§m§ww k ajuram san of late Ram Prasi mrkande, ageé amut 42‘ years, ‘ "9 ,upatian canstable; msiamt s ine (Elice) mipur, i'rehsu and District: wipur (EG). VB r5113 mju Bajaj san 9f @winé Ram Eajaj, ageé abeut 32 years Briver. resident m (samta colmy) aaipur aipur (c6 ‘ A d ‘ _ ' f i .i U , f ‘ “M , ' x R ). " H$G§€ C$LVRT ? $HH \'E°T§$SARH: E§LA$$UR ILQK ASALAT‘i £K-‘i5SGELLANEf3US $P§3Eggjda e39 {if .wGé f-‘xppeiiani: Aaju Ram Versus {Arismu oui: of {imam {lase iwbu ’m35i2m3’H G3i82i2$$7 Shri HV$. Paiei, counse§ for the appe§iant. None fm respondents No. ’& and 2. Sim JM. Gairola, Divisional Manager. fhe {Mentai insurance Ccmgany Limited with Shré' Ghanshyam ?’aie§, counsei far mspondem V No.3. in terms of compromise. award is passad as be3ew:- " Liii additios to compensation aiieaciy awamed by the ‘i‘riouoai, fespandem‘ N03 sha§§ pay Rs. 5G.OU$/- (Rugees Fiiiy iheusam mly) to ”me appeiiant. Far disbursement and depeshi in HJR the ”ffibuna? may pass appropriate orders. "me amount. if ao‘y. kept m, oeposift wiih aaak shasi be oa’y’abéo unéer the orders of Tribumi in acgoa'dancs with éaw. 4) Appe§iam shai? be enmied ‘10 receive :memst on me ammmi so deposited, if am. .. .. 5} .3} in View of ihe above. appeai agamst respondents No. 1 and 2 steeds dismissed. Gui of the above amount, RsSGUX— aRupees five iiundreci oniv} Isheii be paid to counsei for the apoeiiant directiy 'sy Jresoondent No.3 iowaids counsei fee. d“ «a; Ray; if the amoum awarded is not deposited within a period of one month. the insurance‘Company shaii be iiabie io eay inieiesi at the reie of 9% per annum thereafter. 3.) Copy of the awaid styi’be given to the paiiies free of cost. Sdl- " " " . . Sdl- o» V.K.Shrivastava " Member — Lok Adalat JUdge High Court of Chhattisgarh,‘ Bilaspur Respondems: Raw Baiej and others ‘