(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 7251 OF 2009 1. Vandana w/o. Kalyan Fase, 2. Supriya d/o. Kalyan Fase, 3. Mahesh s/o. Kalyan Fase, 4. Priyanka d/o. Kalyan Fase, 5. Yogita d/o. Kalyan Fase. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Kalyan s/o. Laxman Fase, 2. Balaji s/o. Sukhdeo Chinke, 3. Kailas s/o. Arjunrao Mhaske. .. Respondents. .......................... Mr. A.B. Karande, Advocate, for the petitioners. .......................... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 9TH NOVEMBER 2009. COURT'S ORDER : 1. By way of present petition, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 7th August 2009, passed by the learned Ad hoc District (2) Judge-2, Majalgaon, in Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No. 17/2009, thereby dismissing the appeal filed by the present petitioners. The said appeal was filed by the petitioners against the order dated 8th June 2009, passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Wadwani, below Exhibit 44A in Regular Civil Suit No. 118/2008, thereby rejecting the application filed by the present petitioners for temporary injunction. 2. No perversity could be found in the concurrent findings of fact arrived at by the learned Judge of the trial court, in rejecting the application for temporary injunction, and by the learned Judge of the appellate court, in dismissing the appeal, so as to warrant interference in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 3. Hence, the petition is dismissed. ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp7251