AJN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1599 OF 2000 Mr. Vijay Keshav Lele ... Petitioner Vs. Smt. Sunanda Sudhakar Chougule & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Uday Warunjikar for the petitioner. Mr. Jaikumar N. Shirdhonkar for respondents 1 to 5. Mr. A.S. Gadkari, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & D. B. BHOSALE, JJ. DATED : 20TH MARCH, 2007. P.C.:- 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. Mr. Warunjikar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the matter is settled out of court. Learned counsel for respondents 1 to 5 confirms this fact. A zerox copy of the settlement agreement is taken on record and marked “X”. 3. Mr. Warunjikar states that so far as the challenge to section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is concerned, that point does not survive in AJN view of the fact that the validity of the said Act has been upheld. He states that however considering the fact that the petitioner has paid the amount involved in this case to respondent 2, the impugned order be set aside. We find substance in this submission. In view of the settlement the impugned order dated 29/9/2000 passed by the District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum, Sangli, is quashed and set aside. The petition is disposed of. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [D. B. BHOSALE, J.]