IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA G. APP. (DB) No.27 of 2010 THE STATE OF BIHAR ……………….. APPELLANT Versus 1. BIPIN YADAV 2. CHHOTELAL YADAV, BOTH SONS OF LATE DIP NARAYAN YADAV, RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE – BHIRKHI, WARD NO. 10 (NEW 21), POLICE STATION – MADHEPURA, DISTRICT – MADHEPURA. 3. LALAN YADAV, SON OF NOT KNOWN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – JAIPALPATTI, POLICE STATION – MADHEPUA, DISTRICT – MADHEPURA. 4. SURESH KUMAR SUMAN, S/O LATE LAKSHMI YADAV, RESIDENT OF BHIRKI, WARD NO. 10 (NEW 21), POLICE STATION – MADHEPURA, DISTRICT – MADHEPURA. ………………………… RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02/ 25.06.2010 Heard the learned lawyer for the appellant. The State has come against the judgment dated 26th February, 2010 passed by the First Additional Judge in Sessions Trial No. 137 of 2001 whereby he has acquitted the respondents from charges under Sections 307, 149, 323, 325, 379 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code. From the perusal of the judgment impugned and after hearing the learned counsel for the appellant, we are satisfied that the impugned judgment discusses the grounds upon which the judgment of acquittal has been passed. So the judgment requires no interference by this Court Accordingly, this government appeal is dismissed. Kundan (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) (Gopal Prasad, J.)