.[1]. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.363 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1898 OF 2006 Kuldeep Kumar Sethee ...Petitioner. Versus Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Petitioner in person present. Mr.N.Engineer, i/b.Divya Shah & Asso. for the Respondents. .... CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : JULY 21, 2006. JULY 21, 2006. JULY 21, 2006. P.C.: . The petitioner who is present in person appears to be a recalcitrant petitioner. The petitioner moved the learned Vacation Judge for interim relief and that was rejected by order of May 29, 2006. Thereafter fresh motion was take out in Notice of Motion No.295 of 2006 in W.P.(L) No.1167 of 2006. By an order of 23rd June, 2006, as earlier interim relief was refused, the Motion was rejected. However, liberty was granted that if the petitioner is still aggrieved by that order, it is open to him to take out such .[2]. proceedings to which he will be entitled in law. The Petitioner now has taken out fresh motion. Rejection of motion by order dated 23rd June, 2006 does not mean that he can move this Court once again for the same relief. Hence Motion is rejected. [F.I.REBELLO,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]