BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Criminal Jurisdiction) Wednesday, the Second day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.14050 of 2011 1 BASHEER @ BASHEER AHAMED 2 USMAN @ MOHAMED USMAN :PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NOS.7 & 8 -Vs- THE STATE REP BY THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MELAPALAYAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.681/2011 :RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. JEYAPAUL ASSOCIATES Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police in Crime No.681 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for offences under sections 147, 363, 323, 342, 387 and 506(i) IPC, the petitioners are before this court seeking anticipatory bail. 2.According to the case of prosecution, the de-facto complainant was taken by force, from him, an undertaking was obtained by these petitioners as though the de-facto complainant agreed to pay Rs.8,000 and 13,000/- respectively. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that de-facto complainant had borrowed money, for which, he agreed to pay. He would further point out that though the occurrence has taken place on 19.09.2011, the complaint was preferred only on 28.09.2011. 4.Having regard to all the above facts and circumstances, more particularly, the stand taken by the accused that the de-facto complainant had borrowed money, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, but with stringent conditions. 7.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No:V, Tirunelveli, on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. sd/- 02/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO: 1.The Judicial Magistrate No:V, Tirunelveli. 2.-Do- Thro' The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tirunelveli. 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4.The Sub Inspector of Police, Melapalayam Police Station, Tirunelveli Dt. +1. CC to M/S. JEYAPAUL ASSOCIATES Advocate SR.No.37633. RP/03.11.2011/1P/6C. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14050 of 2011,Date:02/11/2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/