IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2301 of 2008 BHUNESHWAR MISHRA Versus CHANDRA SHEKHAR MISHRA & ORS. ----------- 03/ 15.12.2008 This petition has been filed for restoration of S.A. No. 06 of 1995, which stood dismissed for default against respondent nos. 2, 3, 7 and 8 due to non-compliance of peremptory order of this court dated 23.11.2006 by which two weeks time was allowed to learned counsel for the appellant-petitioner to take steps for fresh service of appeal notice upon respondent nos.2, 3, 7 and 8 with correct and present address under ordinary course. Learned counsel for the appellant-petitioner submits that due to inadvertence and wrong hearing, the appellant’s counsel was under the impression that the requisites were to be filed with registered cover with A/D and hence within the time prescribed by this court, the appellant’s counsel filed the said requisites under registered cover with A/D instead of taking steps for service of appeal notice under ordinary process. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this petition is allowed and S.A. No. 06 of 1995 is restored to its original file and number with respect to the aforesaid respondents. Let the filing of requisites under registered cover with A/D by the appellant be accepted. harish/ ( S.N.Hussain, J.)