IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13033 of 2010 1. UPENDRA BHAGAT 2. UDAY BHAGAT @ MUNNA 3. BINAY BHAGAT @ PAPPU-------PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 19.5.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing for the State. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest for the offences under Section 384/34 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. case No. 52 of 2010. As per the allegation in the First Information Report, petitioners are tenant of the informant. Informant made a demand for rent, and the petitioners instead of making payment started, threatening and demanding Rs.1,00,000 as extortion money or in lieu of money transfer of 10 dhurs of land in their name.. Counsel for the petitioners submits that dispute relates to the title and ownership of the land. So far the allegation in the FIR is concerned; there is nothing to show that any extortion money was paid to the petitioners by the informant. It has also been stated that 2 the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Considering these facts, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of above named petitioners is allowed. In the event of their arrest/surrender within four weeks from today in the Court below, petitioners shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in Saharsa Sadar P.S. case No. 52 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.Kumar