IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.966 of 2009 SMT.RAJ KUMARI DEVI WIFE OF LATE MANDISH SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE+ POST- PIANIA, P.S. UDVANT NAGAR,DISTRICT - BHOJPUR..............................APPELLANT Versus THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH DIRECTOR GOVT. OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI 2. THE UNDER SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME, GOVT. OF INDIA, FREEDOM FIGHTER’S SECTION, LOK NAYAK BHAVAN, NEW DELHI. 3. THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE3, BHOJPUR AT ARRAH... ................................................................................RESPONDENTS. ----------- FOR THE APPELLANT :- MR. S.C. MISHRA,ADVOCATE & Mr. NIRAJ KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR THE UNION OF INDIA:- Mr.GOPESH KR.,C.G.C. FOR THE STATE :- MR. M. N. ROY, A.C. TO S.C. XI ------------------ 15-2-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel appearing for the Union of India. The appellant has an untiring zeal to pursue this stale matter. Her husband had filed a claim for grant of Freedom- fighters pension in the year 1981. That claim was rejected in 1993 but in the mean time appellant’s husband had died in 1985. After 1993 again repeated representations led the Government of India to pass a reasoned order dated 11th April, 2001 in which six reasons were indicated to show why the claim was not acceptable and highly doubted on facts itself. The said order has been extracted by the learned writ court. We are not persuaded to substitute our own wisdom with the wisdom of the authority of the Government of India sitting in - 2 - appeal. However, on cursorily going through the reasons, we find no good ground to interfere in the matter. The order of the writ court appears to be justified. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.. ( Shiva Kirti Singh,J) ( C.M.Prasad,J) Naresh