Crl. Rev. No. 934 of 2011 (O&M) [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl. Rev. No. 934 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 25, 2011 Parashwar Kumar Dixit.................................. Petitioner Versus Nahar Industrial Enterprises Ltd. ............... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Hemender Goswami, Advocate for the petitioner. ... Ritu Bahri,J. (oral) Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 16.4.2011 whereby the Court has dismissed the application for adjournment of the accused on the ground that there is no power of attorney of the Advocate on the file. In the zimni order dated 12.3.2011 Mr. Sumeet Sharma, Advocate, has filed his power of attorney on behalf of the accused and conducted the court proceedings after that. The order dated 16.4.2011 is being modified by Crl. Rev. No. 934 of 2011 (O&M) [ 2 ] giving one opportunity to the accused to appear and cross- examine the complainant on the next date of hearing to be fixed by the trial Court on payment of ` 3,000/- as costs. Disposed of accordingly. 25.4.2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Rupi JUDGE