IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15259 of 2011 NAND LAL PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.06.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act and Section 353 of the Indian Penal Code. On information, the informant went to seize the two Magic vehicles loaded with sugar bags when it is alleged that the petitioner and other unknown persons obstructed the seizure and subsequently the vehicles loaded with sugar bags were taken away. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that F.I.R. does not reflect that the vehicles belong to the petitioner at the relevant time and the wife of the petitioner is a PACS member and she has no good terms with the circle officer which resulted into false implication and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. 2 Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Inerwa P.S. Case No. 03 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Bettiah, West Champaran, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)