THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5257 of 2010 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against order, dated 23.09.2010 passed by the learned II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Warangal, in I.A.No.1154 of 2010 in O.S.No.226 of 2004. Petitioners are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.226 of 2004 filed for injunction simplicitor. On their behalf, P.Ws.1 and 2 were examined and their side of evidence was closed on 17.02.2010. Thereafter, the defendants have examined D.Ws.1 and 2. When the matter is coming up for arguments, at that stage, I.A.No.1154 of 2010 has been filed purportedly under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC. Mainly, it is averred in the affidavit filed by the petitioners in support of the application that there is a change of Advocate, as such, they sought reopening of evidence to adduce further evidence. From a perusal of the affidavit, it is clear that there is no valid reason assigned by the petitioners for seeking reopening of the evidence. It is to be noticed that the defendants’ side evidence was already completed. In view of the same, the petitioners cannot be allowed to fill up the lacunae at this point of time. In view of the reasons assigned by the Court below in the impugned order dismissing I.A.No.1154 of 2010 filed for reopening of evidence, I do not find any illegality, which warrants interference in the impugned order under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The Civil Revision Petition is devoid of merit and it is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 27th JUNE, 2011. kvni