-^ u BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISHGARH AT BILASPUR.CCG.l MCC NO.-747/201KSB) Stnl^' AWLTCANT/ PETmONER RESPONDENTS/ DEFENDENTS ^^^* '^ ^ 4. 6. 8. HAMDAS, AGED-65YEARS, S/O.LATEBHIKHAMDAS, CASTVARAGI, OCCUPATION FARMER R/0. URGA, TEHSIL & DISTT.-KORBA (C.G.) v/s SMT. LILABAI, AGED 60 YEARS , W/0. LATE CHARANDAS, R/0. - URGA, TEHSIL-KORBA, DISTT.-K;ORBA(CG.) SMT. BABI, AGED 45 YEARS, W/0. NIRDHANDAS, R/0. - BUDHWARI BAZAR KORBA , TEHSIL-KORBA, DISTT. - KORBA (C.G.) SMT. KUMAM BAI, AGED 40 YEARS, W/O.GIRVARDAS R/0. MUKALPUR, VIA" BILASPUR, DISTT. - BILASPUR (C.H.) SMT. KAUSHALYA BAI, AGED 39 YEARS, W/0. LATE SHANI KUMAR. R/0. VILLAGE URGA, DISTKORBA(C.Go) KU. SANDHYA, AGED 18 YEA.RS, D/0. LATE SHANI KUMAR ASHUTOSH, AGED-16YEARS, S/O.LATE SHANIKUMAR,LEGALGUARDIAN MOTHER SMT KOSHALYABAI. ALOK, AGED 14 YEARS, D/0. LATE SHANIKUMAR, L.EGAL GUARDIAN MOTHER SMT KOSHALYABAI. SL. N0.- 5 TO 7 ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF URGA DISTT. (C.G.) RAJESH KUMAR, AGED 36 YEARS, S/0. LATECHARANDAS R/0. URGA, DISTT. KORBA (C.G.) CL. \^^^{\ (02) 9. SM[TSUSmLABAI,AGED35YEARS, R/O.JARWE, DISTT. KORBA (C.G.) 10. SMT.RAMSHILABAI,AGED30YEARS, R/O.SUHAGPUR, DISTT. MAHASAMUND (C.G.) (L APPLICATION FOR RES'If6RATIONOFW,P. (227) N0.2839 /2011. sn^r ^FI (<-ii<=h ^T^IT ^^ s^NJcb Sahu T ^ TSET •<t|q|(t'4, ^•^'(-I^Ko, ^dl^l^ ,^^........^{^...^^\\... WKtl 5h<1ich ^200 3?H^?T TT^F (<ic<i^<\^) yCTW^f?cT^?T S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K 09.11.2011 Shri SV Purohit, Advocat Heard on IA No. 1 , applic^tion for condonation of delay in filing the application. On due consideratjon, 1 a|n satisfied that counsel for applicant is succeeded in explaining the therefore the application is allov^ed and delay is condoned. Also heard on applicati 2839/2011. Learned counsel appearil counsel for the applicant could On due consideration, appjicant has succeeded in e A copy ofthis order be pl the same be listed for hearing. <=hNid^1'1 "HPT^ff ^ <feTSt <P»i^k i? 3tf?R 3:TT^T Aaarwal for the applicant. elay caused in filing the application, 'n for restoration of WP(227) No. ig for the applicant submits that the not appear on account of bonafide mistake, therefore, WP(227) N^). 2839/201 1, which was dismissed on 07.07.2011, may be restored|to its original file. am satisfied that the counsel for Iplaining the cause of his absence, therefore, the application is allojwed and WP(227) No. 2839/2011 is restored to its original file. iced on record of the original file and Sd/- N.K.Agarwal Judge r