1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 541 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 541 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 541 OF 2006 Mehrunissa Farooqui ... Petitioner Versus Slum Rehabilitation Authority and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Shashi Pandey for Petitioner. Mr. G.D. Utangale for R. No. 1. Mr. P. Jadhav, A.G.P. for State. Ms. T. Puranik for R. No. 5. Mr. H.S. Anand for R. Nos. 6 and 7. CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & F.I. REBELLO & F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : DATED : DATED : MARCH 20, 2006 MARCH 20, 2006 MARCH 20, 2006 P.C. . Rule. By consent heard forthwith. . It is the case of the Petitioners that they had applied to S.R.A. for including their name in Annexure II of LOI. Though they have made applications, according to them till date, the same has not been disposed of. Considering the 2 controversy, the petition can be disposed of by issuing the following directions : (1) If the application of the Petitioner is not yet disposed of by the S.R.A., the same be disposed of within the period of four weeks from today. (2) If the application is already disposed of, the same to be communicated to the Petitioners within the same time. (3) If the Petitioner is aggrieved, it will be open to the Petitioner to take such steps according to Law against the said order. . Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) 3