THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.962 of 2009 Dated 20th April, 2011 Between: Smt.Nemali Uma Rao …Petitioner And The State of A.P., rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Land Acquisition) Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad-22 and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri P.Roy Reddy Counsel for respondents: GP for Land Acquisition The Court made the following: ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in dispensing with Enquiry under Sec.5-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and in initiating proceedings vide ROC.A/37/08, proposing to acquire the petitioner’s land, an extent of Ac.1.81 cents, situated in Sy.No.285/1C of Kamma Palle Village, Madanapalle Mandal and Town, Chittoor District for the purpose of formation A.V.R.Handri Niva Sujala Sravanthi Project Canal, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art.300-A of the Constitution of India and Sec.5-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and set-aside all proceedings in relation thereto, including Sec.4(1) Notification and Sec.6 Declaration and consequently direct the Respondents to refrain from acquiring the petitioner’s land.” At the hearing, Sri P.Roy Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, the interim order, dated 27.01.2009, granted by this Court in W.P.M.P.No.1224 of 2009, shall stand vacated and W.P.M.P.No.1224 of 2009 and W.V.M.P.No.4063 of 2009 are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 20th April, 2011 VGB