IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7833 of 2011 AJMER KHAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 29.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and it appears that name of this petitioner came in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused, Sona Lal Yadav and thereafter, house of the petitioner was raided and one yellow colour attachee was recovered from his house. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that co-accused, Sonalal Yadav has already been granted bail by court below itself and so far as the recovery of above-said attachee is concerned, the same has not been put on TIP, so it cannot be said that the seized attachee is stolen property. Learned counsel appearing for the state could not succeed to controvert the above-said submission. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Ajmer Khan be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Rail Ara (G.R.P.S.) Case No. 57 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Ara, Bhojpur. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)