IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.15762 of 2011 Date of decision: 27.09.2011 Simranjit Kaur, Sarpanch ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Jagjit Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Jaswinder Singh, DAG, Punjab. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Mr. Jaswinder Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, on the instructions of Mr. Gurvinder Singh, DDPO, Kapurthala, who is present in person before this Court, has stated that now action has already been taken against the Panches who have failed to attend the meeting despite of valid notices. Mr. Jaswinder Singh, on the Instructions of Mr. Gurvinder Singh, further states that let Annexure P- 6, impugned order, be quashed and entire fund shall be released in favour of the Panchayat to be utilized for the development work in accordance with law. On the statement of Mr. Jaswinder Singh, on the instructions of Mr. Gurvinder Singh, DDPO, present petition stands allowed. Impugned order (Annexure P-6) stands set aside. Entire funds be released in favour of the Panchayat within 10 days positively. (Alok Singh) Judge September 27, 2011 R.S.