THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.247 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner filed O.S.No.1296 of 2003 in the Court of XI Additional Senior Civil Judge, (F.T.C.), City Civil Court, Hyderabad against the respondent for the relief of dissolution of partnership firm and rendition of accounts. The trial of the suit was commenced and the evidence on behalf of the petitioner was closed. At that stage, the petitioner filed I.A.No.65 of 2008 with a prayer to reopen her evidence. The second respondent opposed the application. The trial Court allowed the I.A., through order dated 24.11.2008 but imposed certain conditions. One of it is that the petitioner shall file an undertaking to the effect that she will not file any further applications, which may become hurdle for completion of trial. The petitioner feels aggrieved by the said condition. Heard Sri B. Chandrasen Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Khaja Mohiuddin, learned counsel for the second respondent. The trial Court was satisfied that the petitioner made out a case for reopening her evidence, and accordingly allowed the I.A. imposing the following three conditions, namely, a) The petitioner shall file all the affidavits in lieu of chief examination on her side; b) She shall pay the costs of Rs.200/-; and c) She shall file an undertaking to the effect that she will not file any further applications, which may become hurdle for completion of trial. The petitioner does not feel any grievance about the first two conditions. How so ever, it may be advisable for a Court to ensure that the suit is disposed of at the earliest and the parties are discouraged from creating hurdles, the imposition of a condition that one of the parties shall not file any applications would negate the very concept of fair trial. Occasions may arise for the parties to file applications as and when the suit progresses. If a frivolous application is filed the Court may certainly dismiss the same by imposing heavy costs, but the right of a party to file application, that too, without even knowing about the development that may take place in future, cannot be countenanced. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed and the third condition imposed by the trial Court through its order dated 24.11.2008 passed in I.A.No.65 of 2008 is set. The trial Court shall endeavour to dispose of the suit itself by the end of March 2010. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ (L. Narasimha Reddy, J.) 13th October, 2009 Js.