1 -IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application No. 611 of 2009 Smt Sushila v. Atmaram and ors Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order None for applicant Mr L. Mohta, Adv for respondents 1 & 2 Mr C.A. Anthony, Adv for respdt no.3. Coram : A.P. Bhangale, J. Dated : 6 th November 2009 None appears for applicant. Heard learned counsel for respondents 1 & 2 and respondent no.3. In view of the statement made in paragraph 2 of the application, appellant was directed to file affidavit of Mr Prakash Patil, Advocate vide order dated 2 nd September 2009. However, learned counsel for applicant failed to file affidavit of Mr Patil. He sought for time on 16.9.2009 and at his request, matter was adjourned to 30.9.2009. On 30.9.2009 also matter came to be adjourned at the request of Mr Paunikar, counsel for applicant. Today, when the matter was called out, none appears for applicant. On going through record, I find 2 that no affidavit, as directed, has been filed. In absence of affidavit of concerned advocate, it cannot be said that sufficient cause has been made out to condone delay. Application is, therefore, dismissed. Judge. hsj