IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MISC. APPEAi?NO. 6<6 ° QF 20d^ ^ MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF MQTQR VEHICLESACT.1988 Appellant Non-Applicants no. 2 & 3 Respondents ^ 1 State of Chhattisgarh through ^ the Collector, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. ^The Director, Department of Health, Behind Mantralgiya, Raipur, Tehsil & Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Versus 1^ Shyamlal Sahu, S/o Siyaram Sahu, aged 26 years, Occupation - Car Driver, R/o through Director, Department of Health, Behind Mantralaya Raipur, Tehsil & Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Non-Applicant no. 1 1. Dulari Nishad, aged 44 years, W/o Sundarlal Nishad s ^ ^- Sundarlal Nishad, S/o Ratnu Nishad, aged 60 years, Ku. Chitrarekha (Minor) aged 12 years, D/o Sundarlal Nishad 3 s- ^: Durgesh Nishad, aged 10 years, S/o Sundarlal Nishad ,©. Suresh Kumar Nishad (Minor), S/o Sri Sundarlal Nishad Non-Applicants No. 4 to8 (Sl. No. 4to 6 minorthrough their mother sl. No. 2 Smt. Dulari Nishad Sl. No. 1, to 6 R/o Gujra, Post - Lakholi, P.S. Mandir Hasod, Tehsil - & Distt. Raipur (CG) rr ^ ^" 8. Smt. Bharti Nishad, aged 20 years, Wd/o Bhimendra Kymar Nishad,UOcCupation - Housewife, R/o Mahamayapara, Arang, Tehsil - Arang, Distt. Raipur (CG) Ved Prakash Nishad, aged 1 year,(T\/linor]T^7o'l^e ^^^^^ BhJmenclfaKumarNishad, ^hrough sl; N6. 7 mother Smt. Bharti Nishad. Qaimants Claim in.AbDeal for settina aside the award, valued at RsT2.27.000/- (Rupees Two Lacs TwentylSeyen Thousand onlvl 1 II! i m fll WH<VSI tb*11<sb ~5^r ^{^i<n^, ^ti1'H'ii<o, [®IQII^^< . M A ^cY/^ & . 6^"^ 200 7- 3TI^?T TT^K (li?^q<\^) 3?1^T ^FT RTli<=b "<T^T 3?TT^T 5h^i<^ Kvr U.B. Hon'ble Shri Jystilce N.K. Aharwal respondents thjough served. 11-03-2010 Shri G.D. Vaswanl, Gbvt. Advocate for the appellant/State. Noneforthe Heard on admission. Learned Govt. Advocate submits that in view of the order M.A.(C) No.681/2007 by this Coui) claim cases arising out of Cl^ 61/2005, this appeal may be dispo^ed of finally. Accordingty, this appeal is order passed by this Court in M.A. 03-2010. A copy of the order be place|d on.rewrd ofthis appeal. <=t)i^(<n<flyi tTprof ^ fe^ iFai^K ^a?rRma^?r ajspearing lor the appettant 10-03-201 Opassedin iift, which covers in both the ^jm Case No.53/2004 & >o^ed of finally. jjjsposed of in vjew of the tC)No.681/2007dated10- Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge \'..y^' i:\