IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 465 OF 2009 IN REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 39 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 102 OF 1993 MANOHAR G. SCINDIA .. .. PETITIONER Vs. UNION OF INDIA through Minister of Petroleum New Delhi & ORS. .. .. RESPONDENTS Mr. Manohar G. Scindia – petitioner present in person. Ms. Geeta Shastri, AGP Mr. M. D. Siodia i/b Rustomji & Ginwala in Writ Petition No. 102/93 for R-4 Mr. Y.R. Mishra for U.O.I. CORAM:-SMT. RANJANA DESAI & SMT. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : 16/2/2010 P.C. There is 63 days’ delay in filing the review petition. Affidavit in support of the motion is filed by Mr. Scindia, the petitioner. There is absolutely no explanation in the affidavit in support of the motion for the delay in filing the review petition except that the petitioner is not conversant with Bombay High Court Rules and procedure and he has erred in not filing review in time. 2. This explanation is hard to digest considering the fact that for a considerable period the petitioner has been prosecuting the litigation personally in this court. In any case in the interest of justice, we condone the delay. Notice of motion is disposed of. (Smt. Ranjana Desai, J.) (Smt.Mridula Bhatkar, J.)