IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.7835 of 2009 Date of decision: 20.9.2011 Parneesh Beri ......Petitioner(s) Versus Satish Kumar Sondhi ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Gulshan Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) On 17.8.2011, the following order was passed in this case: “Record received. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent has submitted before this Court that the present petition has become infructuous as the petitioner-tenant has already handed over the vacant possession of the demised premises tot he respondent- landlord and has left the country. On the other hand, Mr. Gulshan Sharma, Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that he has no information with regard to the submission made. List on 20.9.2011 for arguments. In the meantime, counsel for the parties may inspect the record.” Today, Mr. Gulshan Sharma, Advocate, who is representing the petitioner, has pleaded no instructions. Dismissed for non-prosecution. September 20, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE