IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.Rev. (T) No. 44 of 2008 Decided on: 29.10.2010 Sant Ram …Petitioner. Versus Director of Education and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : None. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General has taken the Court through the judgment dated 16.10.2000 passed by erstwhile learned Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal. There is no error apparent on the face of the record, since as per the facts enumerated in the judgment, dated 16.10.2000, there was no scope of appointment of third teacher in the school. 2. Consequently, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge October 29, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?