1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAIO 1 CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHAflw DATED THIS THE 12 DAY 0? OCTOBER, 2011 BEPOfl THE HONtE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGTHEA MFA No.23779/ 2011 (LACj Kamataka ‘cnrtvari igam Ltd.. Reprc sentc.cl its kxecutivc Engincer. 1L13C I ‘lyNn 2. Naiilu eerth 7 1 Saundani. Dis: belgat;,; ...Appeilant (83 Sn. Ramesh N.M’safr. Ads.,; 1. ‘1 ir ‘p ‘: Lana ‘ii quiskion Officer. • .iop ‘‘n’t ?(nrcr7j Saundatti. p ii uli Fra bar Sdbha ‘‘•••. ‘‘ad. 2. sn (flint ttaadgou Sb. Vinayakagouda Pail!. \gc 463ears Agriculture, N Turan a-’. Ta!:l 3 ailhcmgal. .Respnnd nt’s ms apjxal filec under Section 3411) of tlu Land Acquisitinn Act against the ‘ziclprn at an! award dated 15.4.2011. passed in LAC No.78o 20W nn th- 11- of X’nior CM! Judge. Bailhongal at Bailbopaul partly aileiwin: i’.. IeItn’nct puitic’ 3 lw compensatioli and enhancemci 1 t Of flfl.f)e.p.fn etc., This appea aniinz on for orders this day. tlg Court delis erect the following: -0-fr JUDcMINp Office has raised objection regarding the maintainability of the appeal. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant fairly submits that in view of the decision of Full Bench of this Court in the case of INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND ETC,, Vs. SMT. VARIJA AND OTHERS reported in AIR 2011 KAR 73, the appeal has to be filed before the District Court and not before this Court, Hence, the appeal is held to be not maintainable. 3. The registry is directed to transmit the memorandum of appeal along with the applications to the concerned District Court. The appellant counsel is directed to file copy of memorandum of appeal before this Court for record purpose. Office is directed to refund the entire court fees to the appellant or his counsel after due identification in an expeditious manner so as to enable the appellant to deposit the same before the concerned District Court. Sd/ JUDGE RKK/