1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 1207 of 2010 Rupesh v. State of Maharashtra -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr P.S. Patil, Adv for applicant Mr Adgokar, APP for State Coram : A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 27.8.2010 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Applicant had earlier moved an application for grant of anticipatory bail vide Criminal Application No. 691 of 2009. This Court by order dated 27th August 2009 vacated interim protection granted to the applicant and directed him to surrender before the Investigating Officer. Investigating Officer was directed to complete investigation within three days. It was specifically ordered that applicant would be released on bail after expiry of three days upon terms and conditions as are mentioned in therein. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant had preferred application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing and setting aside the entire process and in those proceedings, liberty has been granted to the applicant to file present application. 3. Be that as it may, when there was specific direction issued 2 by this Court to the applicant to surrender before the Investigating Officer and for his release on bail after expiry of three days, there is no fresh cause of action in favour of the applicant to file present application. Applicant cannot be allowed to flout order of this court. It is obvious that the applicant wants to avoid custodial interrogation. There is no merit in the application and it is accordingly dismissed. Judge. joshi