o /£.\6^' JN THE HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ,,,,..:!1^1(S Writ Petition HoA^ l S / 2004 / RESPONDENTS Dilip Kuinar Hsdau, S/o Late Shri Hafhiram., ^ed about 42 years, Worldag as Maiiager in Cliliattisgarh KIiadi & Graiu Udyog Board (Haath Shilp Prakostha) R/o E/9, Vishal Wagar, R^IC.O, ^S^^- ^•^'."^"SW'^T Versus- :—•' .^•^wc^^^:' p,^^eAto''>^'"" p<es(- . d-d'^"" : I. State ofChhattisRarh, Through. Special Secretary, Departm.eut of Rural Industry, Mantralaya, Shastri Chowk, Raipur (C.G.j. \0 b. Chhattisgarh KhadiAvam Grain Udyoj ijp^ Board (Hasth Shflp Prakbsthaj throu^i its Managing Director, Shubhadra Niwas, Choubey Colony, Raipur (C.G.). WRIT_PEnTIONJJ_NDER ARTICLE 226 OP THE COHSTITUTION OP INDIA_PQR ISSUANCE OP A WRIT OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER WEIT_OR_DIRECTION TO DO JUSTICE IN THE Details ofthe petition. PARTICULAE QF THE_PETITIONER As per cause title, HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR c-» WntPctitiQn No. 191 lof 2004 Petittoner Dilip Kiunar Hedau Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and another Stagfe Bench : Hon'bk Mr. Justfa«Satlsh K. AgnUiotrI. Shri Prashant Jayaswal, Senior Advocate with Shri AU Asgar, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Shri V. V. S. Moorthy, Depuly Advocate Geaeral for (he respondent No. 1. Shri Pradeep Saxena, Advocate for the Intcrvener. Shri J. K. Shastn, Advocate for the Interveiicr Shri K. R. Sahu. Br.iEIESi ORAL ORDER (6*!> April, 2006) The foUowin^ order of fhe Court was passed by Satlsh K. Agirihotri, J. The petitionerwas appomted as Assistant Msmayer in the IQiadi Avam Gram Udyog Board (Hasht ShUp Prakostb^) vide order dated 8.6.1992 (Aitaexure P/2) ia thc categoiy of Schcdufcd Tribe on thc basis of fhc caste certificate pnoduced by the petitioner fhat he beloiigs to 'halba' tribe. Soine complaints were made to the Govenunent against scveral persons, includiag fhe petitioner, that fhey have been appointed on the basis offalse caste certificates, pioduced by them. On the basis of tfae said complaints fhc State Govemment by tetter dated 22.6.2004 (Annexure P/9) directed all thc concemed officers, not to consider thc cases of such candidates, against whom complamte with regaid to false caste certificate is pending, for pToinotion to the higher posfc Tbe pctitioner has filed this petition praymg that the pending enquiiy, the petitioner has acquired r^ht to be considered for promotion to the 5. highcr posfc At this stagp tfae petitioner seeks peraussion ofthis Court to wifhdraw fhis petition with Hberty to qucsfktn fhe ssEtism. of thc State Govenuaent as and when occasion arises. It is furfher submitted fhat the State Govcnunent be directcd to conclude the enquiry as earty as possible because the petitioner is being dcprived of bia right for considcratkin to proinotion. In view of the foregoing, ttus petition is disinisscd as wifhdTawn., reserving liberty to thc petitioncr to take appropriate steps as and when causc of actfaia arises. The Rcspoiident/State is directed to coinplete the enquiiy, as early as possibte, preferabfy wifhin a pcriod of fhree inonfhs fiona tbe date of receipt of a copy of fhis order, as the impugned order was passed on 22.6.2004, ditectmg thc concemed ofGcers not to consider the cases of fhose candidatcs against whoin complaints wifh regard to false caste certificate is pending. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agmhmri llt^SSIB T;-^tkur .^Z^^^.ifS-'