IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.29554 of 2011 1.Juli Devi, Wife of Rajesh Prasad. 2.Rajesh Prasad, Son Sheo Nandan Mahto. Both residents of village Sardar Bigha, P.S. Noor Sarai, District Nalanda. 3.Tuntun Prasad, Son of Chando Mahto, resident of village Dhamar, P.S. Rajgir, District Nalanda. -------Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar -----Opposite Party ------------------ 02/- 22.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The three petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 498A, 379, 341, 323, 504, 34/376 of the Indian Penal Code. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application with respect to petitioner no. 3 being under eighteen years of age with a liberty to surrender before the court below within a fortnight and seek his remedy in accordance with law, where the prayer shall be considered on its own merit, without being prejudiced of instant withdrawal. Permission is granted. Accordingly, this application as regard to petitioner no. 3, namely, Tuntun Prasad stands disposed of as withdrawn. Remaining two petitioners are respectively married sister-in-law and her husband with general and omnibus allegation. The main grievance appears against father-in-law and petitioner no. 3 Tuntun Prasad. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioners i.e. petitioner nos. 1 and 2 be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Bihar Sharif, in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case No. 115 of 2011, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to petitioner no. 2, namely, Rajesh Prasad to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)