1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.39/2011 (Ku. Sushma Manikrao Gajbhiye and ors .vs. State of Maharashtra and ors. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders Mr. C.V. Jagdale, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. T.R. Kankale, AGP for Respondents 1 and 2. CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATED : JULY 15, 2011 Heard. Advocate Mr. Jagdale for the petitioners points out that after filing of writ petition, services of petitioners are terminated. He invites attention to orders dated 14.7.2011 passed this Court in Writ Petition No.40/2011 in similar circumstances and seeks similar orders in the present matter. Learned AGP states that he is still awaiting instructions from respondents no.1 and 2 and he is not aware of the subject matter of Writ Petition No.40/2011. In the circumstances accepting statement of Advocate Mr. Jagdale. we permit petitioners to withdraw present petition with liberty to the petitioners to make a representation to competent authority for redressal of their grievance made in the writ petition. Writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE JUDGE 2 halwai