IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10065 of 2009 SRI AMIT KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS 2 24.8.2009 KHAN The petitioner is aggrieved by office order dated 15.5.2009 issued by the Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road Division, Sitarmarhi whereby he has debarred the petitioner from participating in other tender for non-completion of Riga-Majorganj Road Kilometer 0 to 17; Runnisaidpur-Nanpur- Pupri Road Kilometer 0 to 10; Runnisaidpur-Nanpur-Pupri Road Kilometer 11 to 22 in the district of Sitamarhi. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he had completed major portion of the aforesaid work and the delay has arisen as the work was expanded by revised estimate which too got sanction of the government, contained in Annexure-2. He further submits that apart from this, huge bill of the petitioner to the tune of Rs.50 lacs in respect of each of the works is pending before the respondent authorities. After hearing the counsel for the parties, this court is of the view that if the petitioner files a representation against the impugned order before the Engineer-in-Chief, respondent no.2, he would dispose of the same by a speaking order preferably within six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. (S.P.Singh,J) 2