IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 19231 of 2010 Date of Decision: 27.10.2010. Hukam Singh --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. R.D. Sharma, D.A.G., Haryana and Mr. Manish Bansal, Advocate present in the Court have been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents no.1 and 2 to 4 respectively. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. The land of the petitioner was acquired by the respondents for development of Sectors 43, 52 and 57, Gurgaon in the year 1988 and 2000 respectively. Respondents formulated a policy for allotment of plots to the owners of the land whose land is acquired for development purposes. The petitioner claims allotment of plot under the oustees' policy formulated by respondents from time to time. Petitioner made a representation (Annexure P-3) for allotment of plot, however, no decision has been taken thereon till date. CWP. No. 19231 of 2010 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if, respondents are directed to take decision on the representation made by the petitioner, referred to above. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to take decision on the representation made by the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said respondent. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 27.10.2010. lucky