IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.6495 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 2.12.2010 Papinder Singh and another ....Petitioners Versus Harbans Singh ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr. Vijay Lath, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. C.M.No.25686-CII of 2010 Allowed as prayed for. C.R.No.6495 of 2010 After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners and perusing the impugned order, I am of the opinion that the instant revision petition can be disposed of at this stage without issuance of notice of motion to the respondent, as resorting to this process is likely to delay the proceedings further. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order by which their evidence has been closed. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that if one effective opportunity is granted to him, he shall conclude his entire evidence. C.R.No.6495 of 2010 (O&M) -2- Having regard to the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of and the impugned order is set aside with the direction to the trial Court that only one effective opportunity shall be granted to the petitioners to conclude their evidence subject to payment of Rs.25,000/- as costs, which is a measure of equitable justice to be ensured to the other side. Disposed of. 2.12.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss