IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-31651 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.8.2011 Balwinder Singh ...Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. H.P.S. Aulakh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Bhardwaj, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. T.P. Singh, Advocate for respondents No.3 & 4. Mr. J.S. Dadwal, Advocate for respondent No.5. Rajan Gupta, J (oral). In this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner has sought protection to his life and liberty and his three minor children at the hands of respondents No.4 to 6. Learned State counsel, on the other hand, submits that a compromise has been arrived at between the parties, thus, no cause of action survives. According to him, in case there is any threat, the same shall be looked into by respondent No.1. In view of statement made by the learned State counsel, no further orders are required to be passed in this case at this stage. However, if any cause of action arises, the petitioner will be entitled to avail of the remedy available to him under the law. Disposed of. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 10.8.2011 'rajpal'