IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 28TH AUGUST 2008 / 6TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 8383 of 2006(W) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SATHYABHAMA, W/O. DIVAKARAN, PULLIYIL VEEDU, PULLIYOORVANCHI NORTH, THODIYOOR VILLAGE, POST THAZHAVA, KARUNAGAPPALLY. BY ADV. SRI.N.K.SUBRAMANIAN SRI.S.ANANTHAKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THODIYUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT THODIYOOR P.O., KARUNAGAPPALLY, PIN-690 568, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KARUNAGAPPALLY. 3. VILLAGE OFFICER, THODIYUR, KARUNAGAPPALLY. 4. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM. 5. THE LEGAL SERVICE AUTHORITY, KARUNAGAPALLY, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN. *ADDL.R6 IMPLEADED 6. BHASMATH SUBRAMANYA KSHETRA BHARAM SAMITHI, THODIYOOR PANCHAYAT, THAZHAVA P.O., THODIYOOR , KARUNAGAPALLY, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY. ADDL. R6 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DT. 27.3.2006 IN IA. 4582/06. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.NOBLE MATHEW FOR R2 TO 4 SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY FOR R1 SMT.N.SANTHA FOR R1 SRI.K.A.BALAN FOR R1 SRI.PETER JOSE CHRISTO FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/08/2008 , THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P(C) NO. 8383/2006 APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS EXT.P1:- COPY OF THE REVENUE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THODIYOOR PANCHAYATH. EXT.P2:- COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY R3. EXT.P3:- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BEFORE R4. EXT.P4:- COPY OF THE LETTER NO.12/06 DT. 23.6.06 ISSUED BY R1. EXT.P5:- COPY OF THE LETTER NO.A3-14/05 DT. 27.2.06 ISSUED BY R1 TO PETITIONER. EXT.P6:- COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE LEGAL SERVICE AUTHORITY. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE tss KURIAN JOSEPH, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.8383 OF 2006 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of August, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioner approached this Court challenging Exhibit P5 order and praying for a direction to the first respondent to number the house constructed by the petitioner. There is already an interim order dated 13.06.2006. According to the learned counsel for the panchayath, there is a civil litigation touching on the property. 2. This writ petition is disposed of making it clear that if there is any civil litigation pertaining to the property, the number now alloted to the petitioner's house shall be subject to the outcome of the said litigation. In that view of the matter, it is also made clear that unless otherwise prohibited by any law or order of the civil court, the petitioner shall not be prevented from alienating her property. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. smp KURIAN JOSEPH, J. W.P.(C) No. 8383 OF 2006 J U D G M E N T 28.08.2008