^ /^? -^ ^^) (°^/0? APPI.IGASIGH UIDS5 3ECTIOS 19 OF 2EE ABMINISTRATTVB SS.IBOTAL'S iG£,1985. )M.NO.(^Q^ -S. OM.No. CfoO -^-^of 1995. For use ua the Tribunal's offiee : c ( ( ( ( ( Date of filljig 03? Date of Seeelpt by post» -7/3/^5 Reg 1stration No. J ~7 ~7 ^ [k BE6IS2RAR ZK TE@ XA.DHYA PBADSSH ADMBr'33TBASI7B TRIBUIAL i JABALPQR., 1. AnDlieant s Budhram Stagh son of Sfari (late) H©harSai Bhruv, Upper ©ivisionClerls: (now retired eomptilsorily) ia the Offiee ofSyb-Bivisional- Officer AgrieultQre Sarguja District Sarguja ( ) 2» Mon-aDolicants -lrer.<5Hs- 1. State of Madhya Pradesh tlirough Secretary Bepartment of Agricultyre,Vallabh Bhavan Bhopal (M.P) 2. JoiQt Dl3?eotor,Agricalture, Bxlaspur Division, Bilaspur. 3. SQb-Divisional-Offioer ^grleylture Surajpiar Mstrict Sarguja (M.P) ^-fe-^. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTLSGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition (8) No. 1069 of2QQ5 Petitioner Budhram Singh Versus Respondents State of Madhya Pradesh (now Chhattisgarh) 85 pthers (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) None for the petitioner. Shri P. K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State. ORDERforalt ( Passed on this 29th day of October, 2009 ) 1. 2. The matter is called for hearing twice. On both the occasions none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in prosecuting the matter. In view of the foregoing, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. A copy ofthis order shall be sent to the petitioner forthwith. ——~ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur