THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2573 OF 2010 DATED:30.06.2010 Between: Karri Krishna Kumari .. Petitioner And Satti Ramachandra Reddy .. Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2573 of 2010 ORDER: This is defendant’s revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 19.04.2010 in I.A.No.1796 of 2009, whereby and whereunder, the defendant’s application under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (the Act) to send the suit promissory note to a handwriting expert was rejected on the ground that it is barred by res judicata by reason of the order in C.R.P.No.3909 of 2009, dated 23.10.2009. During the course of arguments, attention of this Court has been invited to the order passed by this Court in C.R.P.No.3909 of 2009. This Court, while rejecting the Civil Revision Petition filed against the order in I.A.No.73 of 2008 for sending the suit promissory note to a handwriting expert, observed that it is always open to the trial Court to compare the signatures on the disputed documents and admitted documents under Section 73 of the Act. Therefore, another application is certainly barred b y res judicata. This Court further observes that if the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed in I.A.No.73 of 2008, which is confirmed by this Court in C.R.P.No.3909 of 2009, it is always open to agitate the same at the appellate stage as making it a ground. In that view of the matter, this Court does not find any error apparent on the face of the record in the order passed in I.A.No.1796 of 2009. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. ______________ (V.V.S. RAO, J) 30.06.2010 KH