XI-HC~»78 Awadh Tripathi. Advocate. State by Shri Gautan Bhaduri. Govt. Advocate on advance copyo Heard o counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitimaer Na. V1 filed nominaticn far Agricultural Member of Krishi Upaj Ma unsel for thepetitioner further submits that thout the election dispute, has to be raised by the e 1 same was not £iled. The He submitted that he came to know subsequently. He was pointedly asked as to whe he came to know that he does classg He cauld not reply; The relevant details and articulars have not been mentioned for demand of justice has in the petitiono No noti been issued a Having considered t e facts and circumstances of the caa and material onrecord, in the opinion of thisCourt. the petitioners have failed t make out a case for interference Jy this Court in exercise f extraordinary jurisdiction Petitioners by Shri Samiti. Basana. .Hi§ nominatian was rejected. ction petiticm, but the s ult has already been notified. not belong to ether backw n ' r d ~ \ . memo. 1311/2001 . WW m 260 mew ‘Lwmw‘t mmqqiaaeg) 4 ' WWW mmewm emm 8-44-2002