IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 45 of 2005 (M/B) Sitamarhi District Sulabh Sauchalaya Sansthan, Having its office at H-2/160B, Bengali Colony, Mahavir Enclave, New Delhi 110045, Through its Vice Chairman Srinivas Mishra, S/o Sri Rajendra Prasad Mishra. ……… Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through Secretary, Nagar Vikas (Urban Development), Dehradun. 2. Nainital Lake Region Special Area Development Authority, Waverly Compound, Mallital, Nainital through its Secretary. 3. Chairman of Programme Monitoring Committee of Nainital Lake Conservation Project/ Commissioner, Kumaon Division, Nainital. 4. District Magistrate, Nainital. 5. M/s Bio-friends Society, Khushal Colony, Malli Bamori, Haldwani through Sri Ashok Kumar Singh. ……….. Respondents Mr. M.C. Pande, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Standing Counsel for respondents Nos. 1 and 4. Mr. U.K. Uniyal, Senior Counsel with Mr. Shobhit Saharia, Advocate for respondents Nos. 2 and 3. None for respondent No. 5. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Mr. M.C. Pande, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Standing Counsel for respondents Nos. 1 and 4. Mr. U.K. Uniyal, Senior Counsel with Mr. Shobhit Saharia, Advocate for respondents Nos. 2 and 3. None for respondent No. 5. 2. Mr. M.C. Pande, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition, now, has become infructuous. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 23.06.2006 23.06.2006 G