[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO 2256 OF 2003 NOTICE OF MOTION NO 2256 OF 2003 NOTICE OF MOTION NO 2256 OF 2003 IN IN IN SUIT NO.144 OF 2003 SUIT NO.144 OF 2003 SUIT NO.144 OF 2003 Mr. Bahecharbahi S. Patel and Ms.Pramila R. Patel ..Plaintiffs. V/s. United International & Ors. ..Defendants. Mr. Aditya Khanna i/b Bhole and Company for the plaintiffs. None for the defendants. CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA J. CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA J. CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA J. DATE : 13TH SEPTEMBER, 2005. DATE : 13TH SEPTEMBER, 2005. DATE : 13TH SEPTEMBER, 2005. P.C. . Heard Mr. Aditya Khanna, the learned Counsel appearing for the plaintiffs. None appeared for the defendants. The matter was on board on 9/9/2005, it was called twice. Today again none appeared for the defendants. 2. The suit in question is for dissolution of partnership. As per the averments made in the affidavit, the apprehension as made out have been taken note of by the order dated 13th August, 2003. Ad interim order in terms of prayer clause (b) has been in [2] existence since then. As there was no counter affidavit to the averments made in the affidavit, prima facie in such suit for dissolution of partnership it is essential that the other party should not deal with or transfer or alienate or encumber or part with the possession of the said office in question. The contention as raised has substance, which cannot be overlooked at this stage till the decision of this suit. In view of this, the present notice of motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). Notice of motion is disposed of. [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.]