AO No. 351 of 2010 with CLMA No. 8350 of 2010 Hon'ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon'ble Nirmal Yadav, J. Shri Rajeev Sharma, Advocate, present for the appellant. Heard. This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 06.09.2010, passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Dehradun, in miscellaneous case no. 97 of 2009, whereby said court has directed the appellant to pay maintenance at the rate of ` 3,500/- per month to his wife and ` 8,000/- towards litigation expenses in the suit of divorce filed by the wife. We have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, and perused impugned judgment challenged before us. It is admitted to the appellant that respondent is his wife who is living with two children born out of the wed-lock. The wife has alleged that the appellant is doing hosiery business, but the appellant has taken plea before the trial court that he runs grocery shop with his father. We do not find error of law or that of fact in the impugned order passed by the trial court. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed summarily with the observation that the litigation expenses (` 8,000/- ) may be deposited by the appellant in two quarterly installment, before the trial court. (First installment by 31.10.2010, and second by 31.01.2011. (stay application no. 8350 of 2010 also stands disposed of). (Nirmal Yadav,J.) (Prafulla C. Pant, J) 29.09.2010 Parul