IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 27141 of 2007 Between: Sri Ramuluvari Devasthanam represented by its Trustee Anakapalle Appala Raju alias Kasi Rao, S/o late Appala Raju, R/o Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Visakhapatnam District, Visakhapatnam. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapanam, Visakhapatnam District. 3 The Thasildar, Anakapelle Mandal, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. 4 The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. 5 the Inspector of Police, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam, District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.Y.V.RAVI PRASAD Counsel for Respondent Nos.4 & 5: AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in interfering in civil disputes pertaining to Ac.0.56 cents in Survey No.482-11/A of Neyyalaveedhi, Anakapalle as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional. Heard Sri Y.V.Ravi Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home and perused the record. From the contentions advanced by the learned counsel and the averments contained in the respective pleadings, it is clear that a civil dispute in O.S.No.278 of 2007 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Anakapalle is pending between the petitioner and the Anakapalle Municipality with regard to the construction of Kalyana Mandapam on the land, which admittedly belonged to the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent No.3, at the instance of the Municipality has been interfering in the said civil dispute. In the counter affidavit filed by respondent No.3, he denied any such interference and stated that when the petitioner along with others obstructed the Project Director, DRDA, Visakhapatnam to whom the Anakapalle Municipality handed over the possession of Kalyana Mandapam for running a Fashion Technology Centre, the organizers of Fashion Technology Centre approached him to solve the issue and in that connection, he visited the said place only to know about the dispute. He further stated that he is not interfering in the civil dispute. Irrespective of correctness or otherwise of this claim of respondent No.3, since he has taken a specific stand that he is not interfering in the civil dispute, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to him not to interfere in the above mentioned dispute in future, because the same is the subject matter of the civil suit. Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP.No.38470 of 2007 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 23rd APRIL, 2008 kvni