IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1855 of 2009 Fudaki Devi, wife of Biro Mahto, resident of village- Khaba Chandra Tola, P.S.-Medani Chawki, District- Lakhisarai. …..Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Bipin Mahto, son of Sahadeo Mahto. 3. Khokho Mahto @ Khakhwa Mahto @ Khakho, son of Udho Mahto. (Both residents of village- Khaba Chandra Tola, P.S.- Medani Chawki, District- Lakhisarai) ……..Opposite Parties. ---------------------------------- 2. 09.12.2011 The informant petitioner has preferred this revision application against the judgment and order dated 22.10.2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. IV, Lakhisarai in Sessions Trial No.534/2007 by which the accused opposite party nos.2 & 3 have been acquitted. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. While passing the order of acquittal through his judgment dated 22.10.2009, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. IV, Lakhisarai has discussed the evidence produced on behalf of both the parties. After having heard the learned counsel for both the sides and after going through the judgment, I find that the view taken by the learned Trial Judge was 2 the probable view and in that light, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This petition is dismissed. V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)