WP(C) 981/2007 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B K SHARMA Heard Mr. Mannan, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. R. Chokraborty, learned State counsel for the respondents. This writ petition has been filed making a grievance against non-disposa l of the matter pertaining to issuance of notice to the petitioner vide Annexure -II notice dated 02.01.07. By the said notice the petitioner was asked to show cause as to why the vehicle No. ML 10-5373 owned by you along with the stock of seized 4,200 liters of kerosene oil including the vessels/container or its sole proceeds/value etc. shall not be confiscated to the Government of Assam for abov e act of contravention involving yourself in an attempt to or abetting the crime of indulging black marketing of highly subsidized blue dyed kerosene oil meant for Public Distribution System. In response to the said show cause notice, the petitioner has submitted his reply which is available in Annexure-3. According to Mr. Mannan, learned co unsel for the petitioner, the petitioner submitted his reply on 11.01.07. It is the grievance of the petitioner that in spite of furnishing the show cause reply , the authorities has not passed any final order. Considering the limited grievance made by the petitioner and as agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, I dispose of the writ petition providing that the authority which has issued the impugned show cause notice dated 02.01.07 sha ll dispose of the matter taking into account the reply furnished by the petition er. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible preferably within 31.03.07. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that if the authoritie s require the originals of the documents copies of which already furnished, the petitioner is ready to furnish the same.