1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2400 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4299 OF 2009 Maruti Madhav Pawar and others ..APPLICANTS -VERSUS- The State of Maharashtra ..RESPONDENT ......... Mrs. S.S. Jadhav, advocate for applicants. Mrs. B.R. Khekale, A.P.P. for respondent. ........ (CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) DATE : 3rd September, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel. 2. The application is not pressed into service to the extent of relaxation of conditions pertaining to the applicant nos.4 to 6. 3. The counsel would submit that applicant nos.1 to 3 are more than 65 years old and are unlikely to cause any detrimental act, which would disturb tranquility in the village. It is stated that the applicant nos.1 to 3 will not do any untoward act and presence of applicant no.2-Komalbai is required in order to attend the delivery 2 of her daughter, who is in final stage of pregnancy. Considering the request of the applicant nos.1 to 3 and having regard to the fact that they are senior citizens, the applicant nos.1 to 3 are granted relaxation from the condition imposed in respect of prohibition to enter in village. The application is partly allowed to the extent of applicant nos.1 to 3 accordingly. (V.R.KINGAONKAR) JUDGE gas/cri2400.10