IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.808 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders. Mr.M.S.karnik, for the applicants. Mr Rushar Sonawane, for respondent no.1. CORAM : R.C.Chavan, J. DATE : 01/07/2010. PC: Heard learned counsel for the parties. The plaintiff has not come to the court claiming gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act though he may have relied on the formula under the Payment of Gratuity Act for computing gratuity. In fact, it was the contention of the applicants that the Payment of Gratuity Act is not attracted to the case of a lecturer. Therefore, the bar under the Payment of Gratuity Act is also not applicable to the suit which the plaintiff has filed. The Civil Judge has rightly held that he has jurisdiction to decide the T suit. Civil Revision Application is dismissed. The Civil Court would decide all the questions which may be raised before it on its own merits. (R.C.Chavan,J.)