IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN FRIDAY, THE 20TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 1ST PHALGUNA 1930 CRP.No. 136 of 2009() --------------------- E.A.NO.150/08 IN E.P.NO.24/08 IN OS.NO.322/2002 of MUNSIFF COURT,HARIPAD .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER ---------------------- R.MAYA, AGED 20 YEARS, D/O. RADHAMONY, MOONNUTHENGIL VEETTIL KARUVATTA VADAKKUM MURI, KARUVATTA VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPPALLY. BY ADV. SRI.S.PRAKASH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- VISWAMBARAN AGED 70 YEARS, S/O. SEKHARAN, ANITHA NIVASIL, AROOR MURI, AROOR VILLAGE, CHERTHALA. THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. --------------------------------------------- C.R.P.No.136 of 2009 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of February, 2009 ORDER The respondent filed O.S.No.322/02 for eviction. The suit was decreed. In execution, the petitioner obstructed delivery and filed an application for adjudication of her rights. She claimed independent rights. The court below rejected the application submitted by the petitioner as per order dated 19th February 2009. The order passed in such an application shall be deemed to be a decree under Rule 103 of Order XXI C.P.C. Therefore, the revision is not maintainable. Accordingly, the Revision Petition is dismissed. If the petitioner wants the certified copy of the order, the Registry shall return the order to the petitioner by substituting a photo copy. Dismissal of this Revision will not bar the petitioner from resorting to appropriate remedy by way of appeal. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE csl