IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13968 of 2010 JALALUDDIN AHMAD . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . For the Petitioner: Sanjay Kumar Pandey-5, Adv. For the State : Santosh Kumar Singh, S.C.22. ----------- 2/ 03/09/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of suspension is on non est grounds inasmuch as he has already handed over charge and also deposited the computer items. Learned counsel for the State points out that the petitioner was transferred in 2007 and the alleged documents in regard to handing over charge are of the year 2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he proposes to represent for revocation of the suspension. That is an aspect to be decided by the employer on his subjective satisfaction and not by the Court to dictate. Any representation by the petitioner is expected to be disposed off in accordance with law within a maximum period of six weeks from the date of - 2 - receipt/production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)