1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CA NO.5649/2009; 5650/2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.160/2000 Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court s’ Orders or directions and Court’s or Judge’s Order Registrar s Orders.. ’ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 24th JUNE, 2009 --- P.C.:- Heard learned Counsel. During pendency of the Second Appeal No.160/2000, there is alleged purchase by Chayabai Babasaheb Jarhad and consequently the appellant desires that she should be impleaded as respondent no.6. It is the risk carried by said purchaser – Chayabai, having purchased the property in controvery during pendency of the appeal. The presence of said purchaser is not warranted in the present appeal as the effect of the appeal will be apparently binding on her. Consequently, CA No.5649/09 is disposed of. Heard Counsel. Respondent No.1 expired 2 during pendency of the appeal. Death Certificate is annexed. The names of legal representatives, certified by the competent authority, are also given. There is delay in causing to bring the legal representatives on record, delay is not deliberate, it is condoned. Abatement set aside. Legal representaives of Respondent no.1 referred in the application be brought on record within fourteen days. CA for bringing legal representatives allowed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/bdv/ca5649.09