IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2010 / 18TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 12415 of 2010(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. JITHIN RAJ.O.P. S/O. PURANDARAN, AGED 23 YEARS, OLIPARAMBIL HOUSE, WEST KOVIL, LOKAMALESWARAM ,KODUNGALLOOR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. JITHIN JOSEPH, KOLLAMPARAMBIL HOUSE, MANALODY, NILAMBUR P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. ABDUL MAJEED T., THOTTATHIL HOUSE, PARAPUR P.O., SOOPY BAZAR, SANTHI NAGAR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. LIYAZ HAMZA, PANIKAVEETTIL HOUSE, BRAHMAKULAMP, THAIKKAD, THRISSUR. 5. SHINE JOSEPH, MADAVANA HOUSE, ALOOR P.O., KALLETTUMKARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.MADHU SMT.C.R.SARADAMANI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY S.C. SHRI P.C. SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 12415 of 2010-B - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 8th day of April, 2010. JUDGMENT The petitioners herein were the students of MES College of Engineering, Kuttippuram for B.Tech Mechanical Engineering degree course for the period 2005-2009. They have appeared for their 6th semester supplementary examination conducted in the month of June 2009. The result of the above examination was published during the third week of March 2010. The petitioners have failed for one paper in respect of their 6th semester supplementary examination. Petitioners 1, 2 and 5 have applied for revaluation in respect of the failed subject, on 29.3.2010 and petitioners 3 and 4 have applied for revaluation on 26.3.2010. The petitioners have remitted the requisite fee also for getting their answer papers revalued. Exts.P1 to P5 are copies of applications submitted by the petitioners for the above purpose. It is the case of the petitioners that they are having offers for employment from different companies, but none of them could join for employment if the revaluation results are not published within a reasonable time. It is in these circumstances, this writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the University to complete the process of revaluation wpc 12415/2010 2 within a time frame and publish the results. 2. Heard learned Standing Counsel for the University. 3. There will be a direction to the respondents to complete the process of revaluation of the petitioners' answer paper and to publish the results within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, if the applications and the fee remitted are otherwise in order. The results shall be communicated to the petitioners also. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/