WW g: W &F(m7@ HE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH ALBMLPLIH ‘ W.P..gNo. J16f [200g (8.3.1 : 1 rGyaneshvar Prasad Upadhyay , S/o Shri S.P. Upadhyay, aged about 39 years, R/o Bandhvapara Bilaspur (C.G.) ETITIONER State of Chhattisgarh , Through Secretary , Education ag,QO?¥ \‘V/I ' Raipur(c.G.) Dcpartment , D.K.S. Bhawan Director of public Instruction , PenSionbada Raipur (C.G‘) WRIT“X PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226OF THE / N“ COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA / T P w HIGH COURT OF CHHA‘ITIS6ARH AT BTI ASPUR W. P. (S) No. 1165 of 2007 Pe'rifioner : Gyméwar Prusnd Upadhyay Verws Rzspondem's 5m of Chha'rrisgurh a: anofher' Singl¢ Burch: Hon‘bla Mr. Jusfice so‘lish K. Agnihoiri. Mr. Kumuresh Tiwari, Advocm'e for fhe petitioner. Surf. Anju Ahuja, Depufy Govemnwn‘l' Advacafe for fhe Sfafe/respondems. O R D E R (Passed on fhis 28*“ Day of February, 2007) Learned counsel @peoring for 'rhe pe'l'ifioner wbmi‘rs 'thof the petitioner is working as Assistan‘r Teacher. The petitioner obtained B. Ed. Exomino'rion certificoie on 20.12.1996, on his own expemes. lmrned counsei appealing for fhe peii‘rioner submits rho‘r the quesiion involved, herein asto whefher The teacher, who obtained B. Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses is entitled to two advance increments. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to two advance increments in view of the decision of this Court in the we of Yashwantr Kumor Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, burg md another {2006 (E) MPJR—CG 96}. This Court in the case of Voshwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, burg md another (Supra), came to the conclusion that the teachers, who had obtained B. Ed. /B.T.I. Examination Certificate on their own Subhash expanses, are coverad by fhe circuinr dafed 24.12.98 isaled by 1h: State Government of Madhya Pradesh. Lenmed couns¢l for The pe'ti'l'ioner fur-1'her wbmifs 1ha+ 1h: fads and quesfion of law involved in the present cuss are squarely covered by decision of 1his Couri’ in‘the case of Yoshwom Kmr Bhoradwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation. Durg and ono‘rhu' (Supra), fo which learned counsel appearing for The respondenfs fairly concedes and agrees with the avermeni made by learned counsel wpearing for the petitioner. Accordingly, thewrit petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Voshwont Kumar Bhomdum Vs. Municipal Corporation. burg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B. Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per the circulars dated 247121998 d 1.3.1999 and further whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. l f I ’ i Sd/— i f Satish K. Agnihom x Judge