IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. M-1123 of 2010 Date of Decision: April 20, 2010 Thakur Dass .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & Others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Kapil Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) This petition has been filed in challenge to Order dated 25.3.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ambala, whereby application of the prosecution for summoning Naresh Kumar, Vikash and Sanjeev Kumar as additional accused has been dismissed. The Trial Court has come to the conclusion that witness Thakur Dass (petitioner) who appeared as PW-8, has merely repeated allegations made in the FIR. The FIR case has also been investigated by the investigating Crl. Revision No.1123 of 2010 [2] agency and it has been concluded that above named three persons were innocent, and had not committed the crime. The Trial Court has come to the conclusion that no evidence has come which could be considered to be sufficient even prima facie to summon the said three persons as additional accused. I find no reason to differ with the findings recorded by the Trial Court. The petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) April 20, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?