l5 " {\F i! !!"!!‘AT! ‘ ‘ iw'r‘hn. '5E'é‘!’ :Qi' snag—u“ Aééivr ! ? B " i i‘ ‘wwwxvn x " ‘ni v W5??? $E?iTiON . I Mal-93 V é f OF 2662 V 8tate of Chhai‘tisgarh ihrcugh the‘Secretary, Public Work-t Deparimem, Govt. {3f Chhattisgarhj DKS Buiiding} Mantraiaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) . Chief Engineer (East); Pubiic Works Separimem‘ . Raipur (Chhattisgarh) R; K. Jain: aged about 63 yeafs, Sie Late 3hr? M. L. Jain, 'retired Assistan't Engineer; Fub5ic Werk3‘Bepartmem, resident;- C/Q Dr. A. K’. Jaih' 6;; Meera Campkex, M. P. Nauar. Zone-In. (Bhébai u I V > 7i . . RT ESPONDEN WRIT PETITbN UNDER ARTICLE 2261227 OF T'HE 4 - 6N5T TUTIGN OF IND§A ‘ £ XI-HC—22 WW,W,W Wm w . L‘192/ ” ' Wt 2002/ m ................................................ WW wm ‘ammm DB: Hon’ble Justics K. H. N. Ku1'anga, CJ’ & Hon’bie Justice L. C. Bhadoo. J. 20.6.2003 Patitionefs/State by Shri Ayaj Nave< Heard. Tha petitionsrS/Staw by“ this petitiox of India haw challenged the order passed Bench at Bhopal dated 13th Decermser, 2G 1014 of 2000 by which leamad Tribunal inetituted by the State Gnvemment ag' g‘ound that as per the ni‘cvisions of Rule Servicea (Pension) Rules 197.6 such depait after the retirement of the emyloyee after and in the present case the last date 0f t 310.1992 and the enquily was not institn ~ Tribunal came to the conclusion that t r ules. ‘ mandatory provisions preseiibed under the We have heard Shl‘i Ayaj Naved, le He is not able to paint out any illegality therefore we are of the Qpinion that there i Asthere is n0 illegality or infirmity in the the petition is liable to be dismissed and t L Gmft AdVQc ate. [under Article 227 of the Censtitution by the M.P. Administrative Tribunal, 31 passed in Original Application N0. has quaehed the enquiiy which was Shri R.K.Jain (respondent) on the {2) (h) of the Madhya Pi‘adesh Civil ental proeeedings could he instituted he four years of the date of the event e misconduct of the respondent was d Within four years therefore leamed ‘ e enquiry was conducted after the Sdl- Chief Justice med counsel for the petitioners/State. 'or infirmity in the impugied order, no merit and no force in this petition. order passed by therlearned Tribunal, same is dismissed. L Sd/- V L.C.BHADOO Judge @ ‘t a h ‘. J. l. a ‘