CR No.4201/2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.4201/2011 Date of decision: 24.08.2011 Virender ....................Petitioner v. Santosh and others .....................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh Present: Mr.Shalender Mohan,Advocate for the petitioner. Jaswant Singh.J.(Oral) Plaintiff/petitioner has filed the present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution assailing the order dated 22.4.2011 (P-7) whereby his prayer for appointment of a Local Commissioner in view of the alleged incomplete report submitted by the previous Local Commissioner has been declined. It is apparent that the petitioner/plaintiff had filed a suit for injunction against his neighbour over an alleged common wall and construction being raised on the common wall. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and gone through the impugned order. It is apparent from the order that the learned Court has noticed CR No.4201/2011 2 that the burden to prove the same is on the petitioner/plaintiff. It is further not disputed that a Local Commissioner was appointed and a report has been submitted. It is also not in dispute that against an order refusing to appoint a Local Commissioner, no revision petition is maintainable in view of the law laid down by a Division Bench of this Court in Pritam Singh and another v. Sunder Lal and others, 1990 (2) PLR 191 and subsequently followed in Sumer Chand Jain v. Vishnu Bhagwan Mangla, 2006(2) (RCR) (Civil) 445. For the reasons stated above,finding no merit in this revision petition the same is hereby dismissed. 24.08.2011 (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge