^^^SlH©tE8EN<ai IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH PETITIONER ^.... ^* .."•^-l^ <x.t'^€%i-"^ -''•'';'s^'^.....^ ^yf"'^:fl:'^-yv-s['"' ?<^...- &^!:'" RESPONDENT ^^6to ^<t ^^^-^ %^v ^ ^- ^' V? -.v^ W.P.(S) N0.4^ c> Q/2006 ^ : PawanKumarKaushik S/o Shri Kashi Ram Kaushik Age about 46 years, Asstt. Teacher Govt. Primary School, Jinda Block- Kawardha Distt- Kabirdham (C.G.) VERSUS 1. StateGovtofChhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, D.K.S.Bhawan Raipur(C.G.) 2. District Education Officer Kawardha, District-Kabirdham (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer Kawardha BlockOffice- Kawardha, Disstt.-Kabirdham(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 sn^rqiT R^i<!b <raT sn^r giTW HIHWTShtTTch 3^^Tpn?PT, SiTn+f'16, (sldl'My ^-^..^S.:.T.\'^.6^'QJ ^200^ 3TT^?TIra^? (l?^3g^T) ?T(fRTC CTf?(T W^T iorter- 30.8.2006 Mr. Somkant Verma, Mr. Satish 6upta, Deput^ advance copy. Heard. The ccese of the petitior^ and as per the Instruction dc4 Assistant Teachers w>ho have their oum expenses after 22-1( The petitioner passed the B.Ed dnd copy of the mark dieet to f has not beeh given the benefit granted two advance incremen^ Court. Having heo-d learned and circumstances of the cose, the cose, the petitioner is allow^ a copy of this petition and its No.2 within a period of 15 dayt directed to examine the case ol' made by the petitioner in this respondent No.2 reaches to the been granted benefit of two a^ olso covered for grant of two coui^sel for the petitioner. Sovt. Advocate for the State/respondents, on +l^(<ri'ifl-< IITRcft t]f fS^S <(a|«l< ^srf^iTan^T ^r is that he is working as Assistant Teacher \zd 24-12-98 issued by the State of M.P., the [iassed B.T.I., B.Ed. and M.Ed. examinotion on )-64 cere entitled for two advance increments. examination on his own cost in the year 1993 hat effect is Annexure P-4, but the petitioner whereas, similorly situated persons hwe been |'s under the orders of the Tribunal <md this coihsel for the parties, having regard to the facts ^yithout expressing any opinion on the merit of ^d to make a detailed representation along with raisiry all his 9rievances to respondent fs from today and in turn, respondent No.2 is i|f the petitioner in the light of the averments ^rit petition and in the repr-esentation also. If conclusion that similorly situated persons have |vance increments ond the petitioner's case is increments on the basis of ©overnment's ttrit aqvance •^ P.T.O. XI-HC-78 Sn^T^iTl^ri^i OTT3:TR?TsbH|cb •f^- Soma I-\- *i 1*1011 aitritb s^^ipn^pr, (jiTi1«<tis, (ciciiyy ."•.^^^^ 200^ w^\ 4d* (Ii?ig^T) CTdTW flf^(T SIT^T order, then respondent No.2 petitioner within a period o^ accordance with law. With the directions afoi-esaid Part'iesdre entitled for tii<ifn41-f Hwvfi ff fs^S <R]«K ^Slf^ITSD^T shall pass order on the representotion of the 3 months from the date of its receipt, in •esaid, the petition stands disposed of. certified copy of this order. L.C. P.T.O. L