IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20826 of 2011 1. Ramjee Prasad 2. Bidya Devi, son of Ramjee Prasad 3. Vimlesh Kumar 4. Jitesh Kumar Both sons of Ramjee Prasad 5. Sweta Sinha @ Rupa Kumari 6. Dipa Kumari Both daughter of Ramjee Prasad All resident of Mohalla – New Godam, Punjabi colony, Gaya, P.S. – Kotwali, District – Gaya. ---------- Petitioners. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Juli Kumari, wife of Kamlesh Kumar, Resident of village – Kako, P.S. – Kako, District – Jehanabad. ----------- 02. 19.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the complainant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 961/2009, for the offences under Sections 498A and 379 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad. All the six petitioners are named accused in this case with in-laws of the complainant with allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. Husband non-petitioner is in custody. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest or surrender 2 within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, in connection with Complaint Case No. 961/2009, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly at least for three years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/ ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)