[1] IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1980 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO. 1980 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO. 1980 OF 2006 Manish Indrachand Sethi (Jain) & Anr .Applicants vs The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. Abhinandan Vagyani, Advocate for the applicants Mr. A.R. Patil, APP for Respondent CORAM CORAM CORAM : K.J. ROHEE, J. : K.J. ROHEE, J. : K.J. ROHEE, J. DATE DATE DATE : 12TH MAY, 2006. : 12TH MAY, 2006. : 12TH MAY, 2006. p.c. . Heard Mr.Abhinandan Vagyani, Advocate for the applicants and Mr. A.R. Patil, APP for the respondent. 2. The applicants who are shown as accused Nos. 3 and 4 in the complaint are not concerned with the transaction between the complainant and accused Nos. 1 and 2. All that has been alleged against the applicants (accused Nos. 3 and 4) is that they purchased the goods from accused Nos. 1 and 2. Nothing is shown that the goods are owned by the complainant. Considering the allegations against the applicants, I think it expedient to grant them anticipatory bail. Hence order:- [2] (a) Application is allowed. (b) Applicants be released on their executing personal recognizance for Rs. 5 lakh each with one surety in the like amount in the event of their arrest in Criminal Case No. 88 of 2006 by Shivaji Nagar Police Station, Ichalkaranji, Dist. Kolhapur. (c) Applicants are directed to make themselves available as and when required by the investigating officer and to cooperate with the investigation. Issue authenticate copy. (K.J. (K.J. (K.J. ROHEE J.) ROHEE J.) ROHEE J.)