IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR MONDAY, THE 24TH OCTOBER 2011 / 2ND KARTHIKA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 646 of 2010(S) --------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.11685/2010 Dated 11/05/2010 .................... PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- C.V.BHASKARAN MASTER,S/O.KUNHAPPA NAIR, AGED 60 YEARS,KEESHALLUR AMSOM,VELLIYAMPARAMBU DESOM,P.O.PRNS COLLEGE, MATTANNUR, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.RAMPRASAD UNNI SMT.SMITHA GEORGE RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT 1 & 2 ------------------------------------------------------- 1. SRI.P.DILIPKUMAR, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL)KANNUR. 2. MR.PRADOSH, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE UNIT INSPECTOR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, IRITTY (NOW STYLING HIMSELF AS PART TIME ADMINISTRATOR,KEEZHALLUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK R1 BY SPL.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.D.SOMA SUNDARAM R2 BY SRI.O.V.MANIPRASAD THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss COC. NO.646/2010 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES A:- COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 11.5.2010 IN IA. 5929/2010 IN WP(C) 11685/2010. B:- COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 17.5.2010 IN WPC. 11685/2010. C:- COPY OF THE NOTICE DT.D 21.5.2010 ISSUED BY R2. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES R1(a):- COPY OF THE ORDER OF SUPERSESSION DT.D 21.5.2010. TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGEMENT tss C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------- C.O.(C). No. 646 OF 2010 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of October, 2011 JUDGMENT This C.O.(C) has been filed alleging wilful disobedience with the directions of this Court in order dated 11.5.2010 requiring to maintain status quo with respect to the managing committee of the second respondent society. The alleged contemnor No.1 is present. He has earlier filed a counter affidavit on 16.6.2010. Subsequently, an additional affidavit has also been filed. The second respondent has also filed an affidavit. The alleged contemnors have tendered unconditional apology for their lapse. It is stated in the affidavits that the alleged action was not wilful and there is no intention to disobey the directions in order dated 11.5.2010. Having perused the affidavits filed by respondents, I am inclined to accept the unconditional apology tendered by them. Accordingly, this C.O.(C) is closed. C.T. RAVIKUMAR (Judge) spc W.P.(C) NO. 2 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. JUDGMENT September, 2010 W.P.(C) NO. 3