1 appln.231.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Misc. Criminal Application No. 231 of 2011 Rakeshkumar s/o. Mathuradas Seth ....Applicant v/s. Union of India & anr. ....Respondents Mr. Amol Deshpande for the applicant. Mrs. M.R. Tidke-APP for the respondent. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI, J. 15th June, 2011 PC: Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties. 2. By way of present petition, the petitioner seeks a direction for transferring Special Case No. 12/2006 to the Special Judge, Pune. It is contended by the petitioner that the petitioner is facing several prosecutions for the same allegations and cases are pending at different Courts. The petitioner has also placed on record a copy of the order dated 25th February, 2002 in Application No. 5367/2010 passed by the learned Single Judge at Aurangabad transferring the case from Aurangabad to Pune. 3. Though in the reply filed on behalf of respondent, it is stated that the 2 appln.231.11.sxw material in the cases is different, the respondents have given no objection for transferring the case and trying all of them at one place. 4. In that view of the matter, rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b). (B.R. GAVAI, J)