THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.LAKSHMANA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO.2115 of 2005 14th November 2005 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 25.08.2005 in W.P.NO.802 OF 2005 on the file of the High Court.) Between: M. Venkat Reddy, S/o. Raghava Reddy, 54 years, Conductor, APSRTC, Bus Depot, Manthani, Karimnagar District. ...APPELLANT AND 1. The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Manthani Depot, Karimnagar District. 2. The Divisional Manager, APSRTC, Karimnagar Division, Karimnagar District. 3. The Regional Manager, APSRTC, Karimnagar Region, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District. 4. The Managing Director, APSRTC, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.LAKSHMANA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO.2115 OF 2005 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Mr Justice B.Prakash Rao) Heard both the sides. At their request, the Writ Appeal itself is taken up for disposal. This Writ Appeal is filed against the order dated 25.08.2005 in W.V.M.P.No.482 of 2005 in W.P.M.P.No.1055 of 2005 in W.P.No.802 of 2005. The writ petitioner sought an interim direction in W.P.M.P.No.1055 of 2005 on the ground that his date of birth was wrongly entered. Later on, the interim order was vacated on 25.08.2005. The learned counsel for the appellant/petitioner submitted that the claim is a substantial one. Having regard to the fact that the impugned order is only an interim order, this Court would not interdict with the same. Hence, we do not find any merits in the Writ Appeal. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. No costs. Office is directed to post the Writ Petition for “Final Hearing” subject to “Part-Heard” on 05.12.2005 before the regular Court hearing the matters. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) _____________________ (P.LAKSHMANA REDDY, J) 14th November 2005 RRB