1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7465 OF 2008 Alka Meghshyam Naikdesai & Ors. .. Petitioners Vs. Kamala Marya Bari & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.R.K. Mendadkar i/b Mr.M.V. Pandey and Mr.R.M. Pandey for the petitioners Mr.S.A. Sawant for respondent nos.2 CORAM : J. N. Patel & Smt. Mridula Bhatkar, JJ DATE : July 16, 2009 P.C. : 1. The parties have tendered the Consent Terms and request the court to dispose of the Writ Petition in accordance with the Consent Terms now being tendered in the court. The same is taken on record and marked X for ‘ ’ identification. The consent terms are between the petitioner Kamla Marya Bari and respondent nos.1, 2, 8, 9, 10 and 21 i.e. the petitioner in writ petition no.4730 of 2009 and respondent nos.2 in the present petition. The said Kamla Marya Bari is personally present in the court and identified by her advocate. She also holds General Power of Attorney on behalf of her family members. Copy of which is annexed to the Consent Terms. The said power of attorney is registered in the office of the Sub-Registrar, Borivali 6, Mumbai Suburban – 2 District, (Bandra). The terms and conditions of the consent terms are read over and explained to Kamla Marya Bari in vernacular. She has understood the same and thereby affixed the thumb impression of her right hand which has been counter signed by her Advocate, Mr.Sawant. The consent terms are also signed by the Advocate for the petitioner as well as petitioner no.6 and Attorney of petitioner nos.1 to 5. They have signed a joint praecipe in respect of the consent terms filed in Writ Petition No.4730 of 2009 and, therefore, they do not want to prosecute the present Writ Petition. In the aforesaid circumstances, we dispose of the writ petition as not pressed. In view thereof, Civil Application No.532 of 2009 is also dismissed as infructuous. ( J. N. Patel, J) (Smt.Mridula Bhatkar, J)