IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 9TH DECEMBER 2011 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 32890 of 2011(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. MAJO P.MATHEW, S/O. MATHAI, PATTUPULAYIL HOUSE, THALORE, THRISSUR DIST. 2. SRIJITH.T., S/O.SREEDHARAN, THEVARAKANDI HOUSE, P.O.PATHIRANKAVU, KOZHIKODE DIST. 3. SUNITH S.MENON, S/O.SURESHKUMAR, 'LAKSHMI', THAYAMKULANGARA, CHERPU P.O., THRISSUR DIST. 4. SARATHKUMAR C.S., S/O.SEKHARAN, CHIROTH HOUSE, ARANATTUAKARAN, THRISSUR DIST. BY ADV. SRI.M.K.DILEEP KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, THENJIPALAM, P.O.CALICUT UNIVERSITY, MALAPPURAM DIST, PIN-673 635. 2. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY, REPD. BY THE REGISTRAR, THENJIPALAM, P.O.CALICUT UNIVERSITY, MALAPPURAM DIST, PIN-673 635. BY ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW . SC, THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: VK WP(C).No. 32890 of 2011(I) ----------------------------------- APPENDIX -------------- PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS ---------------------------- EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RE-VALUATION APPLICATION DT.9.11.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DT.9.11.2011 ISSUED FOR THE REMITTANCE OF FEES FOR RE-VALUATION BY THE 1ST PETITIONER. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE RE-VALUATION APPLICATION DT.9.11.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DT.9.11.2011 ISSUED FORTHE REMITTANCE OF FEES FOR RE-VALUATION BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE RE-VALUATION APPLICATION DT.9.11.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER. EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DT.9.11.2011 ISSUED FOR THE REMITTANCE OF FEES FOR RE-VALUATION BY THE 3RD PETITIONER. EXT.P7 TRUE COPY OF THE RE-VALUATION APPLICATION DT.NIL SUBMITTED BY THE 4TH PETITIONER. EXT.P8 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DT.3.11.2011 ISSUED FOR THE REMITTANCE OF FEES FOR RE-VALUATION BY THE 4TH PETITIONER. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL ------------------------------ / TRUE COPY / P.A. TO JUDGE VK ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 32890 of 2011 I ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 9th day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Petitioners submit that they appeared for B.Tech examination and failed in some papers. They submitted Exts.P1 to P8 applications for revaluation and filed this writ petition seeking an order for expeditious revaluation and declaration of their results. 2. I heard standing counsel appearing for the University also. 3. Having regard to the facts pointed out, it is directed that the University shall complete the revaluation sought for and declare the result of the petitioners, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment, provided the applications have been received and are otherwise in order. W.P.(C) No.32890/2011 : 2 : 4. Petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the University for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/12/12 // True Copy // P.A. To Judge