HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3421 OF 2002 ORDER: Petitioner states that she has been engaged as Job Typist, by the respondents, with effect from 14-08-1996 on consolidated wages. She furnished the particulars of her service. This writ petition is filed with a prayer to direct the respondents to regularize her services in accordance with law laid down by the Supreme Court in HARYANA STATE ELECTRIITY BOARD v. SURESH[1]. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. 3. The respondents have framed schemes for regularization of casual temporary employees from time to time. In case, the petitioner fits in any of the schemes, she is entitled to the necessary relief. On the other hand, if no scheme, as such, was introduced or that the petitioner was not eligible, no direction can be issued to the respondents. It is, no doubt, true that the Supreme Court in Haryana State Electricity Board’s case (supra 1), observed that the services of the employees, who were continued for a long period on casual or contract basis, must be regularized. However, a different view was taken recently in STATE OF KARNATAKA & OTHERS v. UMADEVI & OTHERS[2]. 4. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J January 19, 2011. KTL [1] 1999 LL.J. (1) 1086 [2] 2006(4) SCC 1