IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32715 of 2010 1. MD. SALIM 2. Md. Khursid @ Md. Khushid Alam 3. Md. Bauku @ Md. Akbar 4. Jaitoon Khatoon 5. Shahjadee Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 02.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners are alleged for taking only house hold articles of the informant, according to the learned counsel, may never be believed for refusal of anticipatory bail as admittedly petitioners came in possession of the house and its land purchased in name of father of petitioner no.1. Really if any house hold article was stolen, no recovery is there. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Mahishi (Jalai) P.S. Case No. 66 of 2010 above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Saharsa subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)