IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15724 of 2009 ***** Ram Pravesh Yadav son of Sri Parsuram Yadav, resident of village- Madhiya, P.S. Basopatti, District-Madhubani. …. …. Petitioner Versus 1. The Bihar State Electricity Board through its Chairman, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidhyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 2. Chief Engineer, Electric Supply Area, Darbhanga. 3. Electrical Superintending Engineer, Electric Supply Circle, Darbhanga. 4. Electrical Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Madhubani. 5. Assistant Electrical Engineer, Electric Supply Subdivision, Jayngar, Madhubani. …. …. Respondents ----------- 2. 18.11.2009. Heard counsel for the parties. Petitioner does not disputes that the agreement entered between him and the respondent Electricity Board was to subsist only till 1.2.2009. No doubt there is provision for renewal but that is subject to satisfactory working having been performed by the petitioner. From the impugned order contained in Annexure-5 dated 23.7.2009 the contract has been brought to an end stating that the performance and the collection of the petitioner is not even upto 35% and therefore there is no renewal of the agreement and it has been brought to an end. Learned counsel representing the petitioner, however, based on a chart annexed with the writ application in Annexure-6 disputes the said facts. These are matters of record which requires verification, may be, by the local authorities and they are the best judge whether the performance of the petitioner matches with the records and the commitment. The writ application stands disposed of with the liberty to - 2 - the petitioner to satisfy the concerned respondents with authentic records about the collection and his claim for renewal. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)