c^ Stngfe Beneh BEFORE THE HIGJI COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.l CONTEMPT CASE (C) N0. ^f 2-, 2011 APPLICANTS: 1. Nemichand Agrawal, S/o Shri Ramlal Agrawal, Aged about 46 years, U.D.T., Govt. Middle School, Munnura, District Mahasamund (C.G.) 2. Hari R'am Sahu, S/o Shri fiy^^ ^^f,. Kartik Ram Sahu, U.D.T.^Govt. / ^ Girls Middle School, Boriyajhar, District Mahasamund (C.G.) 3. Puraniklal Dadsena, Aged 48 Years, S/o Shri Ramjee Dadsena, Govt. Girls Middle School, Birkoni, Distt. Mahasamund C.G. 4. Rajendra KuniM Ingole, Aged 47 Years, S/o Shri Khanderao U.D.T., Govt. Middle School, Lohardih District Mahasamund (C.G.) 5. Ashok Kumar Sahu, Aged 33 years, S/o Shri Lakhan Lal Sahu, Head Masters, Govt. Primary School, Labharakala, District Mahasamund (C.G.) 6. Krishna Kumar Chandrakar, Aged 40 ye:u-s, S/o Shri Punitram Chandrakar, U.D.T., Govt. Middle School, Mudhena District Mahasamund (C.G.) 7. Rtfshan Lakra, Aged 34 years, S/o Shri B. Lakra, Head Master, Govt. Pi-amiry School, PaterapaJi, District Mahasarnund (C.G.) 8. Smt. Seema Ingole, '' years, W/o Aged Shri Kum.ar, U.D.T. 44. Rajendra Govt. Giris ^. C^) Middle School, Ambedkar, Distt. Mahasamund C.G. 9. Tripti Dayniel, aged 44 years, W/o Shri Dinesh Dayniel, U.D.T., Govt. -Giris Middle School, Bemcha, Distt. Mahasamundh C.G. VBRSUS RESPONDENTS 1 Sunil Kumar Secretary Education Departnient D.K.S Bhawan Raipur (C.G) 2Hetram Som District Education Officer Mahasamund (C.G) ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 23/1/07 PASSED IN W.P. (S). 6094/06 - fe^^ CONTEMPT CASE UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE ;"^-^.. iiSs I CONTBMPT OF COURTS ACT, 197L ^ ResDondents ContemDtCaseIcUto.412ffOll Nemichand Agarwal & others Vs Sunil Kumar & another ).1-!.2 1. Though a pass-over wa§sought in the first round, no one appears on behaif ofthe applicants in the second round. 2. This petition has been filed by the applicants aiieglng wiliful disobedience of the order passed by the Court on 23.1.2007. It has been pleaded in the petition that a writ petition was fiied claiming grant of two advance increments, The writ petitions filed by the applicants and other persons were disposed of by a common order dated 23.1.2007 in terms of the decision in the matter of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipai Corporation, Durg and another reported in 2006 (II) MPJR- CG96, subject to verification of facts. Representation was made and finaily an order was passed on 8.12.2009 bywhich representation ofthe applicants has been rejected. It has been stated in the petition tha^claim of the applicants has been rejected without prop^r consideration of the observations made in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bhardwaj (supra). 3. A perusal of the order dated 8.12.2009 passed by the District Education Officer, Mahasamund shows t'nat that ctaim of the appiicants for grant of two advance increments was considered and for reasons recorded therein the claim was found untenable and therefore rejected. in the petltion it has not been demon,s|:r^ted as to how the direction issued by the Court has been disobeyed. There is no one to pursue inclined to'issue notice. 4.. The petition is, accordingiy, dlsmisseci.. matter. Therefore, 1 am not Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^ ^