IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 11121 of 2008. Decided on: 20 th December, 2010. Vikram Singh. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________________ __ For the petitioner. : Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Petitioner is seeking regularization from anterior date on the basis of the law laid down by their Lordships of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Mool Raj Upadhyaya versus State of H.P. and others, 1994 Supplement (2) Supreme Court Cases 316 and State of Himachal Pradesh and others versus Gehar Singh, (2007) 12 SCC 43. Since the petitioner has been appointed in the year, 1991, his case is covered by the dicta of Mool Raj Upadhyaya’s case. 2. Consequently, the petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to consider the case of petitioner for conferment of work charge status immediately after completion of ten years’ continuous service with 240 days in each colander year, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. December 20, 2010. (bhupender)