Saha HIGH COIIRT OF CHHATTTSGARH AT BILA8PUR Writ PetMou (S) No, 1781 PETITIONRR Dlin'-v Rain Verma, S/o Sliri Badri Prasad Vemia, Aged about 58 years, Ocuupation Service, Posted as Revenue Inspec'tor, at Revenue Circle Sukaiiia Sub Divisional OfRce Sukama, Distt. South Bastar Dantewada (CG). 1. The State of Cbliattisgarh, through the Secretary, Dqiartment ofRevenue, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. The CoUecfor, Dantewada, Distt. Dantewada (CG). 3. Sub Divisional Ofncer (Revenue), Dantewada, Distt. Dantewada (CG). CWSIT PETmON UNDER ARTTCLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA) CSB: Hon'Me Mr. Satish K. Aeirihotri^J.) Present : Dr. Sanjeet ShaiTna, Advocate foi-the petitioner. Shri Alok Bakhshi, Go\'t Advocate for tfae State/respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on tiris 25th ofMaixh, 2008) }. With the consei'tf ofthe parties, the mafter is taken up for heariiig final'y. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner gubnaits that vide fransfer order dated 26.06.2007 (Aruiexiire P/l), the petitioner has been traiwferred froin the office of Sub Divisiona! Officer, Suknia, Distt. Dantewada to Revenue Circle Deokar, Distt. Durg (CG). He furtlier subniits that the transfer order date 26.06.2007 has not been complied witfa as the petitioner has aot been relieved fi-om tlie old place of posting tojom aew place ofposting. 3. Be that as it niay, it is beyond ones comprehension as to why trat^fer order wliich are passed in the pub'ic iiiterest aiid admiiiistrative exigency, have not been given M, efFect to iimiiediately. Since this fal's within the jurisdiction ofadmuii^tratioii, it is not appropriate to "iterfere with the same. However, the respondents are expected to give effect to the transfer order dated 26.06.2007 as eariy as possible. 4. With the above observation, fhis writ petition stands disposed of No order asto costs. —-—-— Satish K. Agnihotri 1 Judge