IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 220 OF 2009 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 186 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.2219 OF 2000 M/s.Athiti Development Pvt.Ltd ....Appellant V/s. Dudhanatah Kallu Yadav & Ors. ....Respondents ======== Ms.Lakshmi Murali i/by. Lakshmi Murali & Associates, adv.for appellant. Mr.Ramchandra Yadav i/by.Sanjay Udeshi & Co.,advocate for respondent no.1. CORAM : J.N.PATEL, & : SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. DATED : 22ND JULY, 2009. P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. Apart from the issue as to whether the Letters Patent Appeal is maintainable against the impugned order, we have to see that the learned Judge has not committed any error or illegality in dismissing the Chamber Summons filed by the appellants who have to be joined as parties in the suit between the members of the joint family for partition. The learned Single Judge has rightly observed that the appellants have rightly filed an independent suit against Mr.Nimbalkar through whom they are claiming a right to the property which is the subject matter of the partition suit. Therefore, we do not find any merit in the appeal. The same is dismissed. [J.N.PATEL, J] [ SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J]