[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.2142 OF 2008 Sopan @ Mothiram Digamber Dikole ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.Jaydeep D.Mane Advocate for Applicant Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : AUGUST 28, 2008 DATE : AUGUST 28, 2008 DATE : AUGUST 28, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in CR No.127 of 2008 of Karmala Police Station, Dist. Solapur. The said case is mainly under Section 306 of IPC. 3. It is the prosecution case that five years prior to the incident, deceased Dattatraya needed an amount of Rs.50,000/-, hence, he took a loan from the present applicant and also entered into a [-2-] sale deed with the applicant in respect of his land. The understanding was that on payment of the amount, the land was to be retransferred in the name of Dattatraya. Though Dattatraya returned the amount of Rs.50,000/- and in addition, he also handed over another amount of Rs.50,000/- i.e. he repaid the loan along with heavy interest, the applicant refused to return the land and infact, the applicant started abusing and threatening Dattatraya. On account of this situation, Dattatraya got fed up and he committed suicide by consuming poison. All these facts are stated in the FIR. The post mortem notes show that Dattatraya died on account of consuming poison. Looking to the material on record, I do not think that this is a fit case to grant anticipatory bail. Application is rejected. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]