(g7 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILAézF‘UR Writ Petitien No 10?? of 20:34 Petitionei Mercury Trades‘ a pmprletary firm‘ thmugh PK, GK. Panicker (Pcwer of Aitcmey Hoider} iv‘3-249, Padmanabhpur, PO £4 Dist. Qua; we). Versus hn figspondent Bal Steet Ptant. tnmugh Manag§ng Eivstor, 33m: Bhavmn, Bhiiai, PO Bhiiai, {Dist Burg (6C5). (Wnt Petition under Arttcie 226/22 ?’ of Conwtution of mma) $8: Hon’me Win satish K. Agmhw’m, d. Present: Ms‘ Meera Jaaswat, soume? far the petitmner. Mr. AK. Yadav. counsei or the respondent. « yam:Mw-msm-uummuywm ORDER IORAL) {Passed on this 4‘“ day «3f September, 2069) 1) Learned counsef appearing for ma petiticner pieaaa no instruction The petitioner may not be interestecf in pursumg the matter. 2) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismiwed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge f s.