_(/\' u^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF 3UDICATURE AT BILASPLIR(CHHATnSGARHl WRTTPETmON N0.^/^2004 PETmOMER Ad%^ o>^yy .lAS-^' ^rr /- ^ ^Jc^ •:^:y Alakh Ram Sahu S/o. Sri K.R.Sahu Aged aboufc SSyears R/o. Vjtl. Kauhi, P.0. Ranj Tarai, Tah - Patan, Dist-Ourg, C.Q. ^' ^- i^.^" ^" RESPONDENTS VERSl^ ^ 1) The state ofChhaffisgarti Through the secrefcary, Educatlon Deparlment, D.K.S. Bbawan, RaipurC.G 2) Dtetricfc BiucaSon offlcer, Dhamtari Distrid: Dhamtari, C.G. ^ PETmON UNDER ^TICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTmjnQNfiF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS. DIRECnONS AND/OR ORDERS XI-HC-22 a?n^T'^T f<rii<=h 3?n^r st>^ict) 'yf^a ^- ,{ ^ u jNt^^i-. ^ ^- ^. ^a? '^qPTRl^ ^^4l<o^^^^^fa HW<fM ^W^ 3ii^r ira^? ^&.^.M17^-^ fN-^l' 27-8-2004 On a inention being made, this case is t^ken up. Petitioner/s by Shn ^.C* V^Hyri^ State by Shri V.V.S. Murfhy, Dy. Ad^ and Shri Akhil Agrawal and Shn Sandeq) Dube^j. Heard. The inatter relates to transfer oftihe peti^ Counsel for the petitioner/s subniitte<| efifected fflegaUy in contravention oflaw and polij ths State Govemment/competent authority ofthej this order, withln 10 days,' and ori same on its own merits m accordance with law cbl^id^l'l 'RTR^Tf ^ f^T^ Tf^c5TC I? 3?TP?P:T 3TI^T ft^oc^ 'ocate General, mth SIm Satish Gupta, Dy.G.A., Panel Lawyers. Loner from fhe respective place. that fhe transfer of tlie p^titioner/s has beeii ?y. State counsel opposed it. State counsel submitted that the peti.ti|[)ner/s has straightivay filed the petition ^'ithout serving notice for demand ofjustice and represer|tation. Havmg heard and considered Uie rivid c^ntentions, wdthoiit expressing any opuuoii on the merits of the case, in the bpinion .of tfais Court, ejnds ofjustice will be sen'ed if a dii'ection is given to the petitioner/s to make detailed representati^n raising his/lierigiievances and grounds belbie respondents along witii a copy ofthe petition and ^uch representation being j51ed, the State Govermnent/competent authority oftlie respond^nts, under the law, shall consider and decids tlie as ea.r1v ^ ^ci^lule preferably withbi SLX weeks from the date of receipVproduction of the reF|resentation. If any coniraveiition of policy or guidelines is brought to the notice, the same be c^nsidered on its own ments. Coimsel foi the petitioner/s prays tha Cerdfied copy as per mles. Copy to State counsel for compliance. ^^^^v-\^^^ ^£uj^v=r x^&^-^ -^s^^^^Fy- after the decision of the representation if any grievance of the petitioner/s reinains; he/she ma^ be allowed to avall die remedy avaflable imder tlie law. It is open to tfie petitioner to avall the rei^edy available imder the law. Widi the aforesaid observadons, this pet(tion staiids disposed of. Consequendy M.W.P., ifany, also stand^ disposed of. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [^y^r^