IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 29TH JANUARY 2009 / 9TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 3049 of 2009(K) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- SCARIA, S/O.OUSEPH, VALAKKATTU HOUSE, VALAKOM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.PHILIP T.VARGHESE SRI.THOMAS T.VARGHESE SMT.SHUBHA ABRAHAM RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS EVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER GANDHI NAGAR, ERNAKULAM. 2. MR.PRABHASH, PROPRIETOR, CHEERA GRANITES, KUNNACKAL P.O., VALAKOM, MUVATTUPUZHA. SRI.M.K.CHANDRAMOHANDAS, SC FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/01/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 3049 OF 2009 (K) ==================== Dated this the 29th day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T Ext.P2 is an order of consent that is issued by the 1st respondent in favour of the 2nd respondent. Petitioner states that the 2nd respondent is not complying with the conditions in Ext.P2 consent and making this allegation, it is stated that he has filed Ext.P3 before the 1st respondent and in this writ petition, he seeks an order requiring the 1st respondent to pass orders on Ext.P3. 2. Taking into account the limited nature of the relief that is sought for, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to take action on Ext.P3 with notice to the petitioner and the 2nd respondent as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within 6 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp