IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF APRIL, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.19918 of 2007 Between: Sri V.V.V. Somayajulu & others. … Petitioners AND The State Government of A.P., Rep., by the Station House Officer, The Station House Officer, Madhapur police station, Cyberabad Madhapur, Ranga Reddy District & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : None This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.19918 of 2007 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the first and second respondents arresting and making the first petitioner to execute the undertaking letter dated 14.09.2007 stating that the first respondent will execute the register sale deed by Monday which was noted by the second respondent by 19.09.2007 in favour of the fourth respondent and also other signatures on blank white papers by the second respondent in favour of the fourth respondent as illegal, unenforceable on the ground that such acts are not part of the duty of the police authorities and consequently restrain the first and second respondents arresting and taking the second to sixth petitioners to Madhapur police station at the behest of fourth respondent for getting executing the undertakings and documents related to plots bearing Nos.26, 66, 78, 39, 28 and 20 of Universal Cooperative Society is illegal arbitrary and violates Article 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and pass such further or other orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice.” At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioners. It is therefore reasonable to presume that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting their cause in the writ petition. The writ petition is therefore dismissed in default. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition in default, WPMP.No.25685 of 2007 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is also dismissed. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 19.04.2008 ES