1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.09.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH Crl.O.P.(MD).No.12905 of 2011 Perumalsamy ...Petitioner -Vs- State rep. By:: The Inspector of Police Town Police Station, Aruppukkottai Virudhunagar District ...Respondent Mankaiyarkarasi ...Intervenor PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the learned Principal Sessions Judge cum P.C.R. Court, Virudhunagar at Srivilliputhur to consider the petitioner's bail application and dispose the bail application on the same day, if the petitioner surrender before the learned Principal Sessions Judge cum P.C.R. Court, Virudhunagar at Srivilliputhur in Cr.No. 1361 of 2011 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner : M/s.Eddy Embboss For Respondent : Mr.K.V.Rajarajan,Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For Intervenor : Mr.P.Rathinam O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the learned Principal Sessions Judge cum P.C.R. Court, Virudhunagar at Srivilliputhur to consider the petitioner's bail application and dispose the bail application on the same day, if the petitioner surrender before the said Court, in Cr.No. 1361 of 2011 on the file of the respondent. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the intervenor would submit that considering the seriousness of the allegations, such a direction shall not be given. 3. This Court is of the view that the question as to whether the bail has to be granted or not will have to be decided by the Principal Sessions Judge cum P.C.R. Court, Virudhunagar at Srivilliputhur. It is very well open to the impleading petitioner, to raise all his objections before the said Court. 4. In such view of the matter, the learned Principal Sessions Judge cum P.C.R. Court, Virudhunagar at Srivilliputhur, is directed to consider the bail application of the petitioner and dispose of the same as far as possible on the same day, after the application is filed by the de-facto complainant. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5. Learned counsel for the intervenor submitted that the impleading petitioner may not know the filing of the application by the petitioner herein. 6. In such view of the matter, the petitioner in Crl.O.P.(MD).No. 12905 of 2011 is given a period of one week from the date of the order to file the bail application. The impleading petitioner is also permitted to file appropriate application in the bail application to be filed by the petitioner. 7. Once again, this Court reiterates that the learned Principal Sessions Judge cum P.C.R. Court, Virudhunagar at Srivilliputhur, will have to decide the bail application only after hearing the impleading petitioner /de-facto complaint provided such an application is filed. 8. With the abovesaid direction, this Petition is disposed of. SD DEPUTY REGISTRAR ( WRITS ) /TRUE COPY/ ASST REGISTRAR vsg To 1.The Inspector of Police Town Police Station,Aruppukkottai, Virudhunagar District 2.The Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai 3.The Principal Sessions Judge, cum PCR Court, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur. 1CC TO MR. EDDY AND EMBBOOS ADVOCATE, SR: 34183: 1CC TO MR. P. RATHINAM, ADVOCATE, SR: 34130: DM:2011:SEP;30:: Crl.O.P.(MD).No.12905 of 2011 29.09.2011 2P:6C:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/