CWP No.6973 of 2010 - 1 - In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Date of decision: 09.08.2010 Gandhi ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI Present: Mr. PS Jammu, Advocate,for the petitioner. Mr.RS Kundu, Addl. AG, Haryana,for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr.Manish Soni, Advocate, for respondent Nos.4 and 5. PERMOD KOHLI, J. (Oral): The petitioner has deposited a sum of Rs.50,000/- in terms of the order dated 05.07.2010 passed by this Court. Consequently, the vehicle has been released in favour of the petitioner by respondent Nos. 4 and 5. The petitioner has raised the dispute in regard to payment of the instalments for which the parties have entered into a contract agreement. The dispute is primarily between the petitioner and respondent Nos.4 and 5. Respondent Nos.4 and 5 are private parties. Thus, this petition against respondent Nos.4 and 5 is not maintainable. The parties are, however, at liberty to settle their dispute in accordance with arbitration clause in the agreement or by any other appropriate mode before the Civil Court. The concern of the petitioner is that the private respondents should not take forcible possession of the vehicle. In view of the above circumstances, this petition is dismissed CWP No.6973 of 2010 - 2 - as not maintainable. At the same time, the private respondents will not take forcible possession of the vehicle without adopting due course of law. The parties are at liberty to seek appropriate remedy as observed here-in- above. 09.08.2010 (PERMOD KOHLI) BLS JUDGE