IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33976 of 2010 DHIRENDRA KUMAR SINGH & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 09.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned P.P. for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Admittedly, petitioner no. 1 is father-in-law and petitioner no. 2 is mother-in-law of informant. The marriage of informant was solemnized in the year 2009 but it is alleged that she was subjected to cruelty and harassment on account of non-fulfilment of the dowry demand. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the informant produced order sheet dated 24.07.2010 and different order sheets of the learned Sessions Judge. He submitted that in spite of direction of learned Sessions Judge, the husband of informant was not produced by the petitioners. He further submitted that the informant is still ready to lead her conjugal life with her husband. In the aforesaid circumstance, petitioners, namely, Dhirendra Kumar Singh and Madhuri Singh @ Madhuri Devi, in the event of their arrest/surrender, in connection with Ara (Nawada) P.S. Case No. 240 of 2010 registered under Sections 498 A of the I.P.C. and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, shall be released on bail provisionally on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of C.J.M, Bhojpur, Ara subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. It is made clear that if within two months from today the husband of the informant does not surrender before the C.J.M, Bhojpur, Ara, in that event the provisional bail of these petitioners would not be confirmed by the learned court below. Furthermore, it is also made clear that if the husband of the informant surrenders before the learned C.J.M, Bhojpur, Ara within the above stated period then the learned C.J.M. shall released the husband of the informant on provisional bail for reconciliation and shall take effective steps for reconciliation by issuing notice to the informant as well as the husband of the informant fixing a date for the above stated purpose and if the reconciliation is failed then in that event, the husband of the informant would be taken into custody whereas provisional bail of the petitioners would be confirmed. Let this matter be communicated to C.J.M, Bhojpur, Ara through fax at the cost of the petitioners. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)