THE HONBLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.23291 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: The petitioner’s authorization was suspended by the Tahsildar/3rd respondent on the ground that he had beaten a cardholder on 15.10.2008 and that Crime No.187/2008 of Narsampet Police Station for the oﬀences under Sections 324, 323, 506 read with 34 of the India Penal Code was registered against him. The order passed by the 3rd respondent dated 16.10.2008 is challenged in this writ petition Contending inter alia that the allegation that the petitioner had beaten a cardholder is absolutely false and without any basis. It is also contended that the impugned order being in the nature of substantive punishment the same ought not to have been passed without giving him an opportunity of being heard. Be that as it may, since the petitioner has already made a representation before the appointing authority i.e., the Revenue Divisional Oﬃcer, the 2 nd respondent herein on 20.10.2008 requesting to restore his authorization, without going into merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 20.10.2008 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 24.10.2008. Kgr IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No: 23291 of 2008 Between: Vadde Yakender, S/o. Veeraiah, R/o. Narsampet, Warangal District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector (Civil Supplies), Warangal District, Warangal. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Narsampet Mandal, Narsampet, Warangal District 3 The Tahsildar, Narsampet Village & Mandal, Warangal District ..RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records in Proceedings No. A/708/2008, dated 16-10-2008, on the ﬁle of the 3rd respondent herein and quash the same by declaring it as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the terms and conditions of the authorization and the control orders governing the ﬁled, besides violative of principles of Natural justice, Fair Play and Equity and consequently direct the respondents to continue and permit the petitioner to run the Fair Shop No. 10, of Narsampet Village and Mandal, Warangal District by the receiving the Essential Commodities as usually and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. G.ANANDAM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: