ij^ ^., ^, •'.;.'" r" :-°<'^. c^\ y" //!// INTHEmGHCOURTOFJUDICATUREATBILASPURrC.Gy W.P.rS)No.(f&0 /2011 RESPONDENTS ^l \/^>" \^-%%:\^ ^^^^•^ x^^ \^-1- ^^^^ >fr'\d?u~ ./•"' 'y^~ s#" . ^"^ yT'Bi jllfc^U^I VW^'l filffitl^ !| y''^/^ ^i^y PETITIONER ^. AnilKumarKshatriyaS/o'LateShriB.L. Kshatriya, Age about 46 years, R/o Netaji Chowk, (Bajar Gali) Distt.Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS Sfate ofChhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Agriculture Dept. D.K.S.Bhawan,Raipur(C.G.) Director Agricutture,Raipur(C.G.) Additional Director Agriculture, Directorate, Raipur (C.G.) Joint Director Agricutture,BilaspurDivision Bilaspur (C.G) ArunKumar Singh Working as Assistant Grade-3 O/o S.D.O. Agriculture, Sub-Division, Bilaspur (C.G) WRrTPETmONtINDERAKna^S2260FT[IECONSTTTUTION OFINDIA y 1. Particulars ofthe Petitioner: As mentioned above in the cause title. c< ¥¥ rifs^ns 'ciIllUIICi Versus Anll Kumar Kshatriv< State of Chhatt'sciarh & Other; VKil S-'t OPTI UNDER ARTiCLE 226 OF THE CONSTiTUTION OF 1NDIA :- Shri S.P.Kale, Advocate Shri Y.S.Thakur, Dy. Advocate General for the State. (Passed on this 3''° day of March, 2011) 1. Heard learned counset appearing for the parties. 2. The petitioner impugns the order dated 15.6.2010 (Annexure P-1), wherein representation of the petitioner has been considered in very casuai manner without giving reasons. It is the basic requirements for disposal of the representation by an administrative officer. Also, the representatlon has been decided on'y stating that considered, not found proper, dismissed in accordance with law. 3. Shri Thakur, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 to 4 falriy submits. t'nat this order may be quashed and let the Joint Director, Agricuiture, Bilaspur, decide the representation of the petitioner afresh, having regard to the factuai position as weil as the iegal provisions by passlng detaiied speaking reasoned order. 4. ln view of foregoing, nothing survives for adjudication at this stage. However, the order dated 15.6.2010 (Annexure P-1) is quashed. The Director Agricuiture, Directorate, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, is directed to decide the representation afresh, in accordance with law, as aforestated, as eariy as possibte, preferabiy within a period of tv/o months. if necessary, the petiiioner may be given ODDOrtunltv to put forward his case. Accory'ingly, the vvrit petition is disposed of ^y^ ssnoK B!!.. • ^^scW^^SSSE^^ :ssss