..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2491 OF 2008 Mr.Chhotelal Ramkaran Yadav and Anr. ..Applicants. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .... Shaunak Mehta, Adv. i/b. Subodh Desai, Adv. for the applicants. Mr.S.S.Pednekar, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 27th August, 2008. DATED : 27th August, 2008. DATED : 27th August, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in M.E.C.R. No.1 of 2008 of Dahisar Police Station, Mumbai. 3. The learned Advocate for the applicants states that when the applicant had earlier preferred an application for bail before the Sessions Court which came to be rejected, at that time the charge-sheet was not filed. He has submitted that thereafter the charge-sheet came to be filed. Hence he seeks leave to withdraw this ..(2).. application with liberty to prefer a fresh application for bail before the Sessions Court. Liberty as prayed for is granted. On such application being preferred before the Sessions Court, the learned Sessions Judge to consider the same afresh and dispose it of on merits. 4. With the above observation, Criminal Application is allowed to be withdrawn and is disposed of as such. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)