/^SSSiSSS»e£S^S^SSSa^!fSSSSai7, ^^ IV-D IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) V10. JZ0^> / 2007 Petitioner ^' ^fy'. ^f^/' t^ .^" "^ Ku^-Munishwari Dewangan, D/o Late Shri V.L.Dewangan, Aged about 44 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Pt. Motilal Nehru Shool, Durg, Dist : Durg-fC.G.) )<s >•.• Versus Respondents : rt.3^i lf^'f^ <';.^ ^ State of Chhattisgarh Through-The Secretaiy School Education Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur-(C.G.) ii), Directorate of Public Instruction, Raipur-(C.G-) iii) District Education Officer, Durg-(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA •Ausulars_ofthe Petitioner. H!GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BiLASPUR W.P.fS^No.1288 of 2007 Petittoner Ku. Munish<rari Dewangan Versus Respondents State of ChhaKisgsrh & ottisrs S6: Hon'bie Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Shri S. K. Thomas, Advocate fw the petitioner. Shri SaSish Gupta, Deputy Govt. Advocate forthe respondsnte. ^- Th'aL'tir OR D E R (Passed on thi's 2nd day of March, 20)7} The foftowing order of the Court is passed by Sa^sh K. Agnihotri, J. 1. Learned counse! appearing for the petitioner submits that the questfon of iaw invoived in this petffion js governed by the cireular dated 20.1.1987. The High Court of P^adhya Pradesh, Indore Eench, in the case of Indraveer Singh Tonsar Vs. State of M.P. and others { 2004 (2) M.P.H.T. 3 flslOC)}, has considered She Issue and disposed of the said matEer In the foltowins terms:- "2..........1n view of this submission advanced by Counse! for parSes, this petitior. is disposed of by giving foltowjng directtons. Ths respondent No.1 shst! consider petitioner's representations referred to above and dispose of the same at an eariy date, preferably within a pertod of 3 !r,onths from the dats of communicatjon of thfe order in accordance with taw, keeping in mind the circuiars issued by State Govt. as ateo the directions given by the Tribuna! in similar matters." 2. Learned counsei appearing for the parties would jointly submit and admit Shat Shis case, being simitar in nature, is squareiy coversd by the decislon in the case of fndraveer Singh Tomar (supra). 3. !n view of the aforestated reasons, this petition is disposed of wtth iiberty to th®petitioner to make a representation atong with a copy ef the order passed in the case of indraveer Singh Tomar (supra), whteh may be considered and decided, In accordance with iaw, wittiin a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. No /^*'/*l.ar ••5?* •fr?^ .»*, uiu^i sv»v^/ ^•^a&. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge