1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4213 OF 2008 (Sakharam Bhojaji Nadhe vs. Ravindra Bhujingnath Tehale & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DECEMBER 11, 2008. Heard Shri Chopde, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Zoting, learned counsel for respondent No.3. After hearing, I am satisfied that the Courts below have correctly and concurrently found that in view of the bar under Section 27 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961, the petitioner cannot become an owner and declaration cannot be given in his favour. It is, therefore, apparent that there is no prima facie case in his favour. Argument of Shri Chopde, learned counsel that the petitioner is entitled to interim relief as prayed, at this stage is not relevant as there is no prima facie case in his favour. I am not inclined to accept this argument at this stage. Writ Petition is dismissed. JUDGE *GS.