1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 5772/2010 Kawdoo T. Wararkar Vs. Asstt. Charity Commissioner and others. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DECEMBER 1, 2010. Heard Advocate Sirpurkar for petitioner. Assistant Charity Commissioner has by impugned order found that application at Exhibit 31 was again made in order to delay disposal of change report proceeding, which is expedited by this Court. Earlier it had rejected similar request vide its order dated 29.9.2010. Learned counsel for petitioner states that application earlier was only raising objection and at that stage order was passed that issue about locus and interest would be decided at the stage of final hearing. Hence, at final hearing second application was made. Perusal of earlier order dated 29.9.2010 shows that a specific finding that objection raised is 2 to be considered at the stage of final hearing along with other issues. By said order, therefore, effort to have separate adjudication is already rejected. Learned counsel urged that preliminary issue or an issue about legality and validity needed to be framed. It is apparent that vide order dated 29.9.2010 the Assistant Charity Commissioner has already observed that legality and said aspect would be gone into at final hearing and hence the point for determination already exists and is available on record. This Court has directed time bound disposal of the matter till December 2010. I am not inclined to interfere in the matter in writ jurisdiction. The petition is therefore rejected. JUDGE ambulkar