IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11053 of 2009 MAURI YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 31.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in a Police case under Sections 302 and other provisions of the Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The submission is that he is in custody since 8.4.2006. None of the 10 prosecution witnesses had appeared to depose. Learned counsel for the State points out that the petitioner is the person, who fired the first shot on the deceased and only one fire-arm injury has been found. The prayer for bail is rejected. The Superintendent of Police, East Champaran at Motihari shall be duty bound to comply with any summons/warrants issued by the trial court for appearance of the prosecution witnesses. The court below may consider initiation of appropriate proceedings against the Superintendent of Police for non-compliance of the order of the Court. Let the trial be expedited. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)