>f;^te tenafr c 7-.'--\^€) BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.y W.P. fC.) N0. ^9>| ) of 2011 ,.) '-* PETITIONER ^ Natthu Ram Soni Son of late Ram Chandra Soni,aged about 59 years, R/o. Sattigudi Chowk, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.), VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^' ^ ^ . • ,.^^<7^' /ww ^ /.F'-/^: ^y/n>" y/ , 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary, Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Collector, Raigarh (C.G.) ^ 3. Nazul Officer, Raigarh (C.G.) 4. Deputy Director, Town & Country Planning, Raigarh (C.G.) 5. Munidpal Through Municipal (C.G.) Corporation Raigarh, The Commissioner, Corporation, Raigarh ). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^;ff^r "2f5T "fe;n^" 'cm^n^i^^N,- .^'). •^s Deepii *%WWt ft»^1l^» 'TST ^i^id^, ^>Ti|^<t<o, [®ldt<L1lj,< ^......^...{?..&l.^...:s^^200 ^T^?T '<T5RR' (1Gl?^<^) ^wiw^f^sn^r SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J 05-12-2011 ShriiRaghvendra Pradhan Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Gover on advance copy. The grievance as Ofricer has forwarded the case lease of najui iand, the mattei authority / Collector since 2005. petitioner has also not been deci The learned State couns^ petition to decide petitioner's No.A/A-4/03-04 put up by respo< the writ petition and what has b\ one and the same. Since the representation it expedient to direct responde< refiected from the recommendal petjtioner. Considering the outer iimit of three months from The petition is; finally disp^sed ofF. ^^i^rn ^^N g^n^%r, ^^sRr^Tr^-K.s/i 40—2/201 i—i ,50,000. hr 'RTR^ff ^* 'fe^st ^^K ^ 3?fhH 3T^T counsel for the petitioner. r<iment Advocate for the State / respondents 1 to 4 ventilat^dthrough this writ petition is that though Najul the petitioner in the matter of grant / mutation of has remained pending before the competent He submite that the representation made by the M. ^l submits that prayer has been made in the writ j-epresentation (Annexure P/1) reiating to case ident No.3. The prayer made by the petitioner in sen submitted before the Court are insubstance, [las been pending before respondent No.2, J deem it No.2 to take decision on petitioner's case as jon of the Najui OfRcer and representation of the circt|mstances, the decision shouiid be taken within an t^e date of refteipt of copy of this order. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^ •^