IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 16612 of 2008 Between: T. Mohan S/o. Suryanarayana Gupta R/o. Rayadurg Town and Mandal, Anantapur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Anantapur, Anantapur District. 2 Revenue Divisional Officer, Dharmavaram, Ananatpur District. 3 Tahsildar, Rayadurg Mandal, Anantapur District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing the impugned proceedings in Rc.No.525/08(B) dated 25.07.2008 without having any jurisdiction and trying to dispossess the petitioner from the land to an extent of Ac.28.45 cents in Sy.No.318 of Rayadurg Village and Mandal, Anantapur District, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents to not to dispossess the petitioner from the land to an extent of Ac.28.45 cents in Sy.No.318 of Rayadurg Village and Mandal, Anantapur District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.N.ASWARTHA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 16612 of 2008 Order: The impugned notice dated 25.07.2008, issued by the 3rd respondent-Tahsildar, is the subject matter of the present writ petition. When the matter came up for admission on 31.07.2008, this Court passed the following order: “Prima facie, a reading of the impugned notice dated 25.07.2008 issued by the Tahsildar, Rayadurg Mandal, Ananthapur District, the 3rd respondent herein does not indicate as to under what provision of law the same is issued. In the circumstances, while staying all further proceedings pursuant to the impugned notice, the 3rd respondent is directed to appear before this Court along with the concerned record on the next date of hearing. List on 07.08.2008.” Today, when the matter is taken up, the 3 rd respondent- Tahsildar has appeared in-person before this Court and submitted that by mistake he has issued the impugned notice, that he has no power or authority to issue such notice and that he will never repeat such mistakes in future. He, submitted that realizing that he has issued the impugned notice by mistake, has withdrawn the same by issuing proceedings dated 05.08.2008, and produced a copy thereof before this Court. In view of the withdrawal of the impugned notice, nothing survives for adjudication in the writ petition and the same is accordingly closed. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 07.08.2008 Ksr/Nsr