IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.96 of 2010 RAM DEO MAHTO, Son of Late Jai Kishun Mahto, Resident of Ufraoliya Tola, P.S. – Reega, District – Sitamarhi, (Bihar). …………… Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Officer-In-Charge of Reega Police Station, Sitamarhi. 3. Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi (Dumra). 4. Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 5. Inspector General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 6. Commissioner of Police, Bihar, Patna. 7. Home Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 8. District Magistrate, Sitamarhi. 9. Shyamdeo Mahto, Son of Late Jai Kishun Mahto, resident of Ufraoliya Tola, P.S. – Reega, District - Sitamarhi. 10. Amrishpuri Baba, Pandit of Ishmari Thakurwari Mandir, Situated at Ufraoliya Tola, P.S. – Reega, District – Sitamarhi. ………….. Respondents. ----------- 16/ 15.03.2011 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn our attention to Annexure–A to fourth supplementary affidavit on behalf of respondent no. 3. That annexure contains order-sheet of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi of Riga P.S. Case No. 130 of 2009. The last order dated 31.01.2011 discloses that the two girls, who were allegedly kidnapped, have been handed over to their parents. Petitioner is father of the two girls who were alleged victims. Now, when he has got the custody of the girls, learned counsel for the 2 petitioner fairly submits that the writ petition filed for production of the two missing girls has become infructuous. This writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of as infructuous. Kundan (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Gopal Prasad, J.)