IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3203 of 2007 1.YOGENDRA RAI, son of Ram Lakhan Rai, resident of Village Janar, P.S. Aurai, Dist. Muzaffarpur 2.Ram Ikbal Shahi, son of Shri Shankar Shahi, Resident of village Rampur, P.S. Hathauri, Dist. Muzaffarpur 3.Lal Bachan Shahni, son of Dengar Shahni, resident Of village Chotki Narwara, P.S. Tariyani, Dist. Sitamarhi 4.Jai Kishun Ram, son of Dasai Ram, resident of Village Rampur Hari, P.S. Minapur, Dist. Muzaffarpur--------------------------petitioners Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.Raj Kumar Singh at present the Engineer-in-Chief Cum Additional Secretary, Road Construction Department, Visheshwareiya Bhawan, Jawahar Lall Nehru Marg, Patna 3.Moizzure Rahman, the Superintending Engineer, Road Construction Department, North Bihar Circle Muzaffarpur--------------------------opp.parties ----------- 6. 07.01.2010 In the supplementary show cause filed on behalf of the opposite party no.3 the background and details of the case has been stated, on the basis of which details and relevant Circulars/Resolutions of the Personnel Department consideration has been made of the cases of the petitioners and it is submitted that the orders dated 29.4.2008 (Annexure B Series) passed in the case of the different petitioners had been passed on a due consideration of all the said facts and circumstances and thus the order under contempt has been complied with. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not challenge the said explanation given 2 regarding the due consideration of the orders passed against him although he submits that those orders are not correct on the basis of the facts. In the above circumstances, no case for proceeding under the contempt jurisdiction is made out. The contempt application is, accordingly, dismissed. The petitioners if they are aggrieved by the orders dated 29.4.2008 (Annexure 4 series), may challenge the same in appropriate proceedings. (Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.) spal/