IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No.35189 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 02, 2011 Shanti Devi ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.H.P.S.Ghuman, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. On the complaint made by the petitioner, FIR has already been recorded. The petitioner now seeks for providing protection by way of security guard. It is not possible to provide security guard to each citizen. There is no viable threat seen to the petitioner to call for any direction. This prayer is highly unjustified. The respondents have adequately acted into the matter on the basis of complaint made by the petitioner. The petition is without merits and is dismissed. December 02, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE