IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8959 of 2010 1. ASHOK KUMAR 2. Vinay Kumar Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 6/ 06.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Pramod Kumar, learned counsel for the Informant. Several rounds of shot was there aiming the informant including first by both the petitioners on informant but that did not hit anyone. For the second time, petitioner no.1 shot firing which hit only Arbind Prasad who was saving informant but according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, injury is not justifying the allegation as the same is found simple caused by hard and blunt substances. Theft is ornamental and the differences are political. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Manpur P.S. Case No. 07 of 2010 above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Nalanda at Bihar Sharif subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)