IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7857 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 7857 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 7857 OF 2005 Jakiya Siraj Madar ... Petitioner V/s Janata Sah. Bank Ltd. ... Respondent ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7871 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 7871 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 7871 OF 2005 Siraj Ghudusab Madar ... Petitioner V/s Janata Sah. Bank Ltd. ... Respondent Mr. H.S. Venegavkar for the petitioners in both patitions. Mr. P.D. Dalvi for the respondent No.1 in both petitions. CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATED: 22ND NOV., 2005 DATED: 22ND NOV., 2005 DATED: 22ND NOV., 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C.: 1. By the impugned orders in these two petitions, the learned Trial Court has taken the written statement on record and granted cost. In appeal, the Court has increased the amount of cost from Rs.100/- to Rs.600/-. Inspite of the same, the present petition is filed 2 challenging the order of taking written statement on record. The petition is wholly misconceived and in any event it is against an inter-locutory order and does not call for interference under Art.227 of the Constitution of India. Petition dismissed with no order as to costs. .....