ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.71 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.71 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.71 OF 2008 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2419 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.2419 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.2419 OF 2007 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Applicants. (Orig.Res. Nos.1 to 3) Vs. Sanjay Bhagwant Shinde. ...Respondent. (Orig. Petitioner) Ms.P.H.Kantharia, APP for the State. Mr.S.V.Marwadi for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : BILAL : BILAL : BILAL NAZKI & NAZKI & NAZKI & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. V.MOHTA, JJ. V.MOHTA, JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 15TH JANUARY, 2009. : 15TH JANUARY, 2009. : 15TH JANUARY, 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. The learned APP, has filed this Application for transferring of 3 cases to one Police Station on the representation filed by the Petitioner. 2. The Respondent is an accused in 3 separate cases which are pending in 3 different places viz. Pune, Nashik and Thane. After some time, the Application has been made by the Respondent that the Petitioner could not seek the transfer of the case No.606/2007 from Pune because he was witness in the case and not an accused. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent submits ( 2 ) that when he had filed an application for anticipatory bail, it was opposed by the State. In any case, modification of the order passed by this Court on 8th January, 2008 is only of a academic interest because all the 3 cases have already been investigated. 3. The Application is, accordingly, disposed of. (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) (BILAL (BILAL (BILAL NAZKI, J.) NAZKI, J.) NAZKI, J.)