IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23010 of 2010 1. GOPAL SINGH, S/O PARAS SINGH, 2. MANOJ SINGH, S/O BIRCHA RAI …..PETITIONERS. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 09.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner along with the others are alleged for kidnapping Ramashray Rai after dragging him from his house is doubted on the ground that grievance was really existing to the informant for his (deceased), act of transferring his land to different persons. Petitioner no. 1 is purchaser of certain pieces of land from Ramashray Rai while petitioner no. 2 is identifier. Most of the witnesses are showing about killing of Ramashray Rai by the informant and his sons. Earlier while Ramashray Rai was to his villager, a petition was given on his behalf in the Court of C.J.M., Gopalganj about his apprehension of killing by the informant and his sons. However similar allegation are there against the informant and accused persons though for contradictory 2 cause, but statement of the informant may not be believed for refusal of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Vijaipur P.S. Case No. 39 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Bhardwaj ( Mandhata Singh, J.)