IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. (T) No. 13607 of 2008. Decided on 23.02.2011. _____________________________________________________ Narender Balyani. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner has already made a representation for the redressal of his grievance vide Annexure A-1, dated 05.12.2002. However, the same has not been decided till date. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2, now to decide the representation made by the petitioner on 05.12.2002 (Annexure A-1) by passing a speaking/detailed order, within a period of four weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge February 23, 2011. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.