CWP(T) No.2893 of 2008. 11.05.2009 Present: Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.D. Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1. The petitioner has assailed the seniority list of Senior Clerks/Clerks in the pay-scale of Rs.1200-2100 and Rs.950-1800, circulated on 16th February, 1993. He had approached the H.P. State Administrative Tribunal by way of O.A. No.1042 of 1994. The learned Tribunal was pleased to direct the Chairman of the respondent/Board to treat the original application as representation. He was directed to decide the representation made by the petitioner. The representation made by the petitioner was rejected on 21.4.1995 by the Chairman and the same was conveyed to the petitioner. A perusal of Annexure A-10 reveals that the same is neither self-contained nor reasoned. It is settled law that any order which has civil consequences must be a speaking and reasoned order. Accordingly, Annexure A-10 dated 21.4.1995 is quashed and set aside. The Chairman/Secretary of Board is directed to decide the representation afresh within a period of eight weeks from today. He shall pass a self-contained and speaking order after hearing the petitioner. With the above observations, the petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), J. May 11, 2009. (sck)