Civil Revision No. 569 of 2010 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 569 of 2010 Date of decision: 27.4.2010 Chetan Kumar Garg ...Petitioner Versus Harish Kumar and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Suman Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. S.D.ANAND, J. Initially, the learned Trial Court stuck off the defence of the respondents, vide order dated 26.5.2009, on account of the fact that written statement had not been filed within the statutory period of 90 days. Thereafter, the defendant-respondent filed a plea for the recall of that order. The recall came about at the hands of the learned Trial Court, vide order 24.10.2009. The plaintiff-petitioner in revision against it on an averment that the learned Trial Court could not have reviewed its own order. I have heard Mr. Suman Jain, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and carefully gone through the file. None entered appearance on behalf of the respondent to assist the Court in spite of service. It is apparent, from a perusal of the impugned order itself, Civil Revision No. 569 of 2010 -2- **** that it is a case where the learned Trial Court proceeded to review its own order. The adoption of that course was incompetent. The petition shall stand allowed. The impugned order dated 24.10.2009 shall stand set aside. April 27, 2010 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge