1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.3434 of 2009 (Shrikumar Krushnakumar Mohata v. Laxminarayan Vitthaldas Daga) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri K.R. Lule, Advocate for Petitioner. Coram : R.C. Chavan, J. Dated : 25 th August, 2009 This petition is directed against the order passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wardha, below Exhibit 90, which gives liberty to the parties to propose the name of Commissioner for being appointed for verifying the signatures of the plaintiff on various documents. Both the plaintiff and the defendant filed applications for appointing Handwriting Expert as Commissioner for examination of these documents. The plaintiff proposed the name of one Shri Athale, which was objected to by the defendant. Therefore, the learned Trial Judge ordered that the parties should propose the name of Commissioner by a joint application. There is nothing wrong in such order passed by the learned Trial Judge. 2 The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the reason given for not appointing Shri Athale, namely that the defendant has no faith in Shri Athale, is not proper. If the parties want that the documents should be examined by the Court Commissioner, that is obviously by an independent Expert, it is implicit that they must have faith in him. It will be a question between Shri Athale and the defendant as to why the defendant has no faith in Shri Athale. That cannot be a matter, which needs to be gone into in the present proceedings. The learned Trial Judge rightly ordered that the parties should jointly propose an agreed Expert. No interference is call for. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Judge. pdl