IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 13TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 22ND BHADRA 1929 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3102 of 2007() ------------------------------ CRA.640/2006 of III ADDL.SESSIONS COURT, KOLLAM CC.130/1999 of CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, KOLLAM .................... REVN. PETITIONER: APPELLANT/ACCUSED ----------------------------------- A.THAJUNISA, FATHIMA MANZIL, PANAKONAM CHERY, THRIKOVILAVATTOM VILLAGE, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.V.JAYAPRADEEP RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT ----------------------------------- 1. SUBASH, C.P.NIVAS, ULIYAKOVIL, KOLLAM. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.K.S. SIVAKUMAR SMT.SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Crl.R.P. No.3102 of 2007 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 13-09-2007 ORDER The accused in C.C. 130 of 1999on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kollam for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed against him concurrently by the courts below. 2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter. Crl.M.A.No. 9646 of 2007 has been filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 seeking permission to record the composition entered into between the revision petitioner and the complainant. The said petition has been signed by both the revision petitioner as well as the complainant and their respective counsels. In the light of this development, the aforementioned composition is recorded and it will have the effect of an acquittal of the revision petitioner within the meaning of Sec. 320 (8) Cr.P.C. This Crl. R.P. is disposed of as above. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) ani.