HIGE COURT OF CHH‘I‘TISARH AG AT BILAR SPU W'RIT PETITION (C) , No. 2852 0172907 : 1) Vgav Bhatlya S/o Sugnamai Bhatlya, aged about 45 years i’roprxe‘wr — Shankar Pan Bhandar and STD PCO/ near Ra11way Statlou Raigarh, Tehsi} and District Raigarh (C.G.) Vipin Punjabi Advocate, S/o Shri G.D.Punjabi: aged 46 years R/o of Beladala Sindi Colony Ra1gaxh. Teh311 and Dlstnct Ralgarh (C G) VERSUS 1) State of Chhattlsgarh through Secretary Home : Depaxtment, Govt of C G DKS> Bhawan ‘Mantralaya Ralpur (C G) a; Director General of Police, Pohce Head ( Quartet Ralpur (C G ) ,3) Inspector General of Police Bi1aspur Division, Bllasnur (C G ) r 4) Supeimtendent of Pohce Ralgalh (C G ) 5) Subhash Slngh Town Inspector C1ty Kotwah Raigarh, Dismct Raigarh \C G ) ‘ HCLE 226 OF THE CONb'l ITUTION OF INDIA RESPONDENTS ‘ I Present: esh BaJaj, Government Advocate for the State, re ond D111p Dubey, Advocate for respondent No 5 ORDER Passed on 30m day of Aoghst, 2007) 'Court, supporting documentswere filed. On oerusal of the report rs that the Citv Superintendent of Police it a _ Ralgarh, has conducted an enquiry Wlth regard to the alleged meident ‘ havmg taken place m the mtervemng night of 4/5 August 2006 The report indicates that there was only verbal exchange between the l J 'PETITIONER I ; u e' t G ( e '""’l£/v. , ;r petitioners and the Town Inspector, Subhash Singm but there was n assault or beating ofthe petiiioners. Raju Mishra, one eye witness has also deposed in the same manner. I have perused other papers and depositions of other persons. It appears that there was no incident of such nature as is complained by the petitioners. Thus, this petition is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- i ,\ "” V Satish K. Agnihotri Judge y r o