IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22541 of 2010 1. MOHAN SAHNI 2. SHEOJI MAHTO ------------------------ PETITIONERS Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. PUNAM DEVI ------------------------ PETITIONERS ----------- 3 9.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioners are alleged for committing rape (gang rape) upon the informant. Delay is first defence is explained that husband was waited and in cases of rape, victim always avoids to inform the incident. Now a petition is said filed in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate about commitment of no rape is nothing more than to tamper with the evidence. If yet she is not deviating from the contents of petition, she is liable for the offence for false prosecution. Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioners is rejected. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)