IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.36 of 2011 RAM PATI OJHA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, SON OF LATE MANGALA CHARAN OJHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARKI SAHJAULI, P.S. SHAHPUR, DISTRICT- BHOJPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH HOME SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BHOJPUR AT ARA 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BHOJPUR AT ARA 4. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BHOJPUR AT ARA 5. OFFICER IN CHARGE, SHAHPUR POLICE STATION, DISTRICT- BHOJPUR AT ARA………………………………..RESPONDENT 1ST SET 6. SURYANATH TIWARI SON OF LATE RAM PRAVESH TIWARI 7. JAGANNATH TIWARI SON OF LATE RAM PRAVESH TIWARI 8. SUNIL TIWARI SON OF SURYANATH TIWARI 9. VIJENDRA TIWARI, SON OF JAGANNATH TIWARI 10. JIUT RAM SON OF SHIV RATAN RAM 11. TEJ NARAYAN RAM SON OF JIUT RAM 12. KASHI RAM @ THORA RAM, SON OF RAM PEYAR RAM 13. DINANATH MALAH SON OF BHOLA MALLAH 14. GANESH CHOUDHARY SON OF DINANATH MALLAH 15. NANHKI DEVI WIFE OF DINANATH MALLAH 16. HARERAM RAM SON OF LATE GHURA RAM, ALL SL NOS. 10 TO 16 ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARKI SAHJAULI, P.S. SHAHPUR, DISTRICT- BHOJPUR…………………………. RESPONDENT 2ND SET ----------- 2 30.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The basic grievance of the petitioner is that even though the title and possession of the petitioner has been declared by the decree of Civil Court, the respondent second set are bent upon to disturb the petitioner to the extent of harvesting his crops during the relevant season. Petitioner also lodged criminal case against them at the material time, however, the respondent second set have continued their illegal acts by disturbing the petitioner. In the above circumstances the prayer has been made that now the State should come to his rescue and protection. Mr. Ajay, learned Standing Counsel No. XI appearing for the State submits that whenever the petitioner has brought to the notice of the authorities appropriate actions have been taken, however, in case petitioner brings it to the notice of the authority which necessitates taking any action, the same would be taken as per law. In the above circumstances, considering the submissions of the parties, it will be open for the petitioner to file separate representations before the respondent nos. 2 & 3 stating all the relevant details. In case such representations are filed, the concerned respondents shall look into the grievances and shall also take appropriate action as permissible under the law. The writ application accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)