IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18605 of 2009 1. RAJESHWAR PRASAD SAH @ RAJESHWAR SAH S/O LATE DHANESHWAR SAH R/O VILL- SUKHASAN, P.S. MURLIGANJ (ARAR O.P.), DISTT. MADHEPURA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPTT., BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION CUM ADDITIONAL SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPTT., BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR KOSI ZONE, SAHARSA 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION OFFICER SUPAUL 5. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER TRIVENIGANJ 6. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL OF BIHAR, PATNA ----------- 03. 01.02.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, State as also the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the claim for the length of pensionable service as also against the deductions made from the amount of leave encashment and gratuity in total sum of Rs. 90,000/-. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that for redressal of his grievance petitioner represented the matter before the District Superintendent of Education, Supaul. However, for expeditious disposal of his grievance as highlighted in the writ application, petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the respondent no. 5 giving details of the claim with regard to the pensionable service since petitioner’s claims is that the service should be counted with effect from the year 1988 when the school in question was taken over. 2 In such view of the matter, in case such representation giving specific claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider each of the claims raised by the petitioner in his representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without further delay and the representation be disposed of by reasoned order. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Let a copy of the order passed on such representation shall also be communicated to the petitioner. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)