IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 17835 of 2002 Between: P.A.Chowdary, Hindu S/o. Sri Papa Rao, R/o. Gandhipuram-III, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 2 The Superientendent of Police, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 3 The Director of Prosecutions, D.G.P. Office Compound, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, declaring the proceedings fo the 1st respondent herein bearing No.Ref.C1(M)702/2002 dt. 6.9.2002 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the terms of appointment of the petitioner and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as Additional Public Prosecutor for the court of 1st Additional District & Sessions Judge, Rajahmundry, E.G.District, till the fresh appointment is made by the government and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:M/S INDUS LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. Date:09.04.2008 Ccm To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{ANURADHA}