IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.165 OF 2008 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.2519 OF 2007 Snaga Technologies Pvt Ltd. ..Plaintiffs Vs. Mehul Entertainment Private Limited ..Defendants Mr. Karl K. Shroff i/b Singhi & Co. for the Plaintiffs Mr. Mehul Shah for the Defendants CORAM: A.P. BHANGALE, J. DATE : 3rd MAY, 2010 P.C. 1. Heard. Perused the affidavits on record. The defendants have disputed the suit claim and contended that the defendants are not liable to pay any amount to the plaintiffs. While according to the plaintiffs, the plaintiffs are yet to receive the balance amount of Rs. 2,33,667/- from the defendants as also interest @ 18% p.a. on the outstanding dues. 2. The learned counsel for the defendants also submitted that on technical grounds too, the defendants have arguable case and may defeat the suit claim. After considering the averments in the plaint, annexures to the plaint and the affidavits filed on record, I think, it is the case for grant of conditional leave to defend the suit. The defendants shall furnish a bank guarantee in the sum of Rs.2 lacs, pending the hearing and disposal of the suit and file the documents evidencing the bank guarantee within 8 weeks subject to this condition, leave is granted to defend the suit. The summons for judgment is made absolute. The summons for judgment stands disposed of accordingly. 3. The suit shall be on board to report the compliance of this order on 21st June 2010. (A.P. BHANGALE, J.)