CWP (T) No. 5784 of 2008 26.4.2010 Present: Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.M.Negi, Dy. Advocate General, for the respondent-State. Mr. Neel Kamal Sood states that he has no instructions from his client. According to the State, even though the petitioner had completed 240 days of continuous service between the year 1993 and 2000, but, however, in the year 2004, he abandoned the work and has not reported for duty thereafter. This fact has not been controverted by the petitioner. Be that as it may be, the State has placed on record policy of regularization of daily waged workers. In the interest of justice, a direction is issued to the effect that if the petitioner is otherwise eligible for regularization under the policy, Annexure R-2, the State shall consider his case for regularization in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the present petition is disposed of. 26th April, 2010 (Sanjay Karol) (C) Judge.