IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.56 of 2009 SARJU SINGH . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 02. 02.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. It is submitted that by order dated 9th of July 2004 (Annexure-1), this court permitted the petitioner to file a representation with respect to the grievances that a sum of Rs. 38,304/- was wrongly withheld from the provident fund dues. It is further submitted that although the petitioner represented before the concerned authority alongwith a chart indicating the correct amount of G.P.F. payable to him. According to the petitioner no decision has been taken as yet. This application has been filed on 7th of January 2009, however, no reply has also been filed on behalf of other side. Considering the above, this contempt application stands disposed of. However, in case no decision has been taken as yet, the authority concerned may take the appropriate decision without delay with regard to the grievances of the petitioner with respect to G.P.F. Dues to the tune of Rs. 38,304/- which has wrongly been withheld. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)