... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.469 OF 2004 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.469 OF 2004 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.469 OF 2004 Smt Somi Appu Dubala ...Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Shri Sanjeev P. Kadam for the Applicant. Mrs M.H. Mhatre, A.P.P. for the Respondent-State. CORAM : R.S.MOHITE, J. CORAM : R.S.MOHITE, J. CORAM : R.S.MOHITE, J. DATE : JANUARY 16, 2006. DATE : JANUARY 16, 2006. DATE : JANUARY 16, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. This is Revision filed by the original complainant impugning the judgment passed by the IIIrd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Palghar on 02.11.2004, acquitting the accused for the offences punishable under section 323, 506 and 504 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. On perusal of the impugned judgment and order it is found that the acquittal is based on cogent and acceptable reasons. The complaint itself was lodged after delay of eight months. In the complaint the Applicant stated that the accused Krishna had slapped her, whereas in the evidence she has stated that both the accused slapped her. Giving of abuse and threat is not proved. There is no case for retrial, therefore, the Revision Application is dismissed. ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE