-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1171 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.1171 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.1171 OF 2006 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1099 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.1099 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.1099 OF 2006 Dilipkumar Jagadrikprasad Gupta ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Ms Pooja Bhojane for the Applicant Mr.U.V.Nikam A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : NOVEMBER 15,2006. : NOVEMBER 15,2006. : NOVEMBER 15,2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate for the Applicant and the learned A.P.P. for State. The conviction of the Applicant is for offence punishable under section 325 of the Indian Penal Code. The substantive sentence is simple imprisonment for three years. The Applicant was on bail throughout the trial. There is no allegation of misuse of the liberty granted in his favour. 2. The Advocate for the Applicant states that the entire fine amount has been deposited by the Applicant. The particulars of the deposit are mentioned in the Application. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the Applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 4. Application is disposed of by passing the following order: -2- i) The Applicant shall be enlarged on same bail on which he was enlarged during the pendency of the trial subject to filing fresh bail bond. ii) The Bail is granted subject to condition that the Applicant will report to Shivaji Nagar Police station, Mumbai once in every two months till the disposal of the Appeal. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE