IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 18TH BHADRA 1931 Bail Appl..No. 5119 of 2009() ------------------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------------- G. VIPINAN, CHIEF EDITOR, AGED 55 YEARS, POLYGRAPH'MALAYALAM FORTNIGHTLY, S/O. GANGADHARAN VAIDYAR RESIDING AT PADMA VILAS, MUNDAKKAL WEST, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SMT. SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLCIE, KOLLAM THROUGH THE GOVT PLEADER, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. 2. SASEENDRAN @ SASEENDRA BABU, SANDYA BHAVANAM, MUNDACKAL WEST, KOLLAM. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOLLAM EAST. BY SRI. V. TEKCHAND PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T. SANKARAN, J. --------------------------- B.A. No. 5119 of 2009 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 9th day of September, 2009 O R D E R Apprehending arrest by Kollam East Police, on an accusation of having committed non bailable offence, the Petitioner had filed this Bail Application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It is alleged that he apprehends arrest in connection with a petition filed by the second respondent Saseendran @ Saseedrababu. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that in Kollam East Police Station, no crime was registered against the petitioner on a petition filed by Saseendran @ Saseedrababu. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that on the other hand, Crime No. 858/2009 was registered against 9 persons on the information given by the petitioner, where the offence includes an offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has got information that the attempts are being made to arrest the petitioner by Punalur Police Station. The prayer in the present Bail Application does not cover such a situation. B.A. No. 5119 of 2009 2 3. The submission made by the learned Public Prosecutor that there is no intention to arrest the petitioner by Kollam East Police on a petition filed by the second respondent is recorded. The petitioner is at liberty to move a fresh Bail Application for other reliefs in connection with the apprehension of arrest by Punalur Police. The Bail Application is disposed of as above. K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE ln