-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.760 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO.760 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO.760 OF 2008 1. Mr Bhujangrao Ramrao Dhamdhere and ors. .. Petitioners. Vs 1. Rajaram Yashwant Dhamdhere and anr. .. Respondents. Mr A.Y.Sakhre, senior counsel with Mr Y.Sakhare i/b YKS Legal, for the petitioners. CORAM : D.B.Bhosale,J. CORAM : D.B.Bhosale,J. CORAM : D.B.Bhosale,J. DATE : 11.02.08. DATE : 11.02.08. DATE : 11.02.08. PC: PC: PC: 1, Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. This petition is directed against concurrent findings of the courts below in the proceedings arising from the application Exhibit-5 in Regular Civil Suit No.37 of 2006. By the impugned order, the application Exhibit-5, filed by the respondents-plaintiffs, has been allowed initially by the trial Court vide order dated 28.7.2006 and confirmed by the appellate Court vide order dated 26.11.2007. This court is informed that during pendency of the application Exhibit-5 the trial Court had granted ad-interim order. Keeping that in view and considering that the ad-interim order passed by the trial court operates for more than 1.1/2 years, this court is not inclined to interfere at this stage -2- disturbing the interim relief granted to the respondents-plaintiffs. In the circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed. However, keeping in view the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the trial Court shall endeavour to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of one year from the date of receipt of this order on merits in accordance with law and without being influenced by the observations made in the instant proceedings arising from Exhibit-5 application. (D.B.Bhosale,J.) (D.B.Bhosale,J.) (D.B.Bhosale,J.)