IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No.959 of 2008 Date of Decision: 15.2.2008 Prem Singh .....Petitioner Vs. Balwinder Singh ...Respondent .... CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA **** Present : Mr.Rahul Chhatwal, Advocate for the petitioner. ... RAJIVE BHALLA, J (Oral) Challenge in this revision is, to an order dated 7.1.2008 passed by the Civil Judge, Ferozepur. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order. As far as the direction to furnish an indemnity bond it does not call for any interference. However, it appears that the suit had been filed for recovery of Rs.36,992/- and, therefore, directing the respondent, to furnish an indemnity bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- may not be justified. Consequently, the present revision is disposed of, with liberty to the petitioner, to file an appropriate application before the trial Court for review/recalling of the said order. 15.2.2008 ( RAJIVE BHALLA ) GS JUDGE