CWP No.514 of 1990 1 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.514 of 1990 Date of Decision: 26.04.2010 Ram Avtar and others ...petitioners Versus Union of India and others .....Respondents 1. Whether Reporter of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment- Yes/No. 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not- Yes/No. 2. Whether judgment should be reported in the digest-Yes/No. Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh Present: Mr. Rameshwar Malik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate for the respondents. ..... Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Mr. Rameshwar Malik, Advocate appearing for the petitioner states that increment was refused to the petitioners on the ground of pendency of writ petition. Mr. Malik further states that petitioners shall move fresh representation before the respondents. Learned counsel for the respondents states that if representation is moved by the petitioners same shall be disposed of by the respondents by speaking order in accordance with law. In view of the statement, given by learned counsel for the respondents, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks withdrawal of this petition with liberty to move fresh representation before the respondents. Petition is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to move fresh representation before the respondents within CWP No.514 of 1990 2 a month from today. Respondents shall take decision thereon within a month thereafter and shall dispose of the representation in accordance with law by speaking order. Petition stands disposed of. (ALOK SINGH) JUDGE 26.04.2010 sharmila