WP(C) 1777/2005 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY None appears for the petitioner when the case is called. Mr. M. Khatania r, learned Standing Counsel, Education, appears for the respondents. 2. The petitioners seek direction for their appointment on the basis of the annexed select lists (Annexures- I and J). Although petitioners are unrepresent ed, it is pointed out by the learned Standing Counsel from the averments in the writ petition itself, that the said purported select lists for LP and ME School teachers post under the Raha Legislative Assembly Constituency was not appro ved by the Govt. and accordingly they were never published. Mr. Khatniar accordi ngly submits that no direction can be given for appointment on the basis of such so called select list(s). 3. Be that as it may, considering the fact that the counsel for the petitio ner is not present, it would be in the fitness of things to dismiss this writ pe tition for non-prosecution, rather than on merit. It is ordered accordingly.