W.P. No. 3748 (ss) of 2001 (Old No. 23500/ 1996) H on ’ble Ra jesh Ta n d on , J . Heard Sri Manoj Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has already been reinstated in service from July 12, 1996 and as such the prayer made by the petitioner in his writ petition for a direction for quashing the order dated 7th October, 1997 terminating the service, therefore, has already become infructuous. The order dated 19th August, 1996 shows that the petitioner, who was terminated on 12th July, 1996, was further on 12th July, 1996, reinstated. In view of the aforesaid statement given by Sri Manoj Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition has become infructuous and the same is dismissed as infructuous. However, the petitioner shall continue to work in pursuance of the order dated 19th August, 1996. The order dated 19th August, 1996 be taken on record. (Ra jesh Ta n d on , J .) 17.02.2006 Rathour