HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PEITITON No. 28731 OF 2011 Dated 2nd November, 2011 Between: S. Kranthikumar ………Petitioner And The District Collector, Kurnool and another ………..Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri K. Sitaram Counsel for the respondents : Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition The Court made the following ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue a Writ or Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing Land Acquisition notice (5A) in the proceedings of the 1st respondent in Rc/G.1.1531/10 dated 12-1-2011 in so far as H.No. 25-5 of Dhone town published in “Andhra Jyothi” daily dated 21- 1-2011 proposing to take possession more land what is notified under a notice under sec. 4(1) dated 19-5-2010 of the Act as illegal arbitrary and without jurisdiction and violative of the provision of the Land Acquisition Act and Art 300 A of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the notification of the 1st respondent in Rc/G.1.1531/10 dated 12-1-2011 in so far the petitioner is concerned.” At the hearing, Sri K. Sitaram, learned counsel for the petitioner realising that his client has not questioned the award, seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to his client to file a fresh writ petition questioning the impugned proceedings along with the award. The request of the learned counsel for the petitioner is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, WPMP No. 35523 of 2011, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated: 2nd November, 2011 ks