IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 20TH MARCH 2009 / 29TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 8975 of 2009(N) ----------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------- SHILDA, W/O.LATE JOHNSON, KANNAGATHU, PERITHANAM DESOM, KAIPAMANGALAM VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI. K.SHAJ SRI.SAJJU.S RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. VILLAGE OFFICER, MANAVALASSERY VILLAGE. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, IRINJALAKUDA. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 8975 OF 2009 (N) ===================== Dated this the 20th day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T The grievance of the petitioner is regarding Ext.P2, by which the mutation sought for has been declined on the ground that the property is under attachment. 2. Mutation is effected in terms of the provisions under the Transfer of Registry Rules, which provides that the mutation effected is only for fiscal purpose and can have no effect on other claims. If that be so, the pendency of the attachment need not stand in the way of the respondents in effecting the mutation sought for by the petitioner. 3. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of quashing Ext.P2 and directing the 1st respondent to pass fresh orders on the application made by the petitioner in the light of this judgment. Petitioner may produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp