IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 19252 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 8th February, 2011. Partap Singh Petitioner through Mr. Bikram Jit Arora, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents through Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] Learned State Counsel, on instructions from Charanjit Singh Gill, Assistant Food and Supplies Officer, Tarn Taran, who is present in Court, states that the petitioner has acknowledged the receipt of supply of the essential commodities to the Depot allotted to him and his grievance has been fully redressed. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous, however, with liberty to the petitioner to seek its revival in case it is found that the acknowledgment relied upon by the respondents has never been given by him. Disposed of. Dasti. February 08, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE