Criminal Misc. No. M-1766 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-1766 of 2011 Date of decision : 27.04.2011 Sandeep @ Bori ....Petitioner V/s State of Haryana ....Respondent BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. R.N. Lohan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Malik, AAG Haryana. Mr. Navkiran Singh, Advocate for the complainant. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail in a case registered against the petitioner vide FIR No. 311 dated 30.07.2010 under Sections 307/34 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act at Police Station Sadar Hansi, District Hisar. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that petitioner is in custody for the last 8 months. According to him, it is not clear from the FIR as to whom gun shots injuries have been attributed. He submits that petitioner is thus entitled to concession of bail. Learned State counsel has opposed this prayer. He submits that petitioner is the main accused. He fired four shots at the injured by a Criminal Misc. No. M-1766 of 2011 2 revolver, one of which hit him in the groin. According to him, one bullet injury is still embedded in the body of the injured. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. It is evident that allegation against the Sandeep @ Bori (petitioner herein) is that he fired four shots in which the injured suffered serious bullet injuries. Even in the FIR it is alleged that the petitioner who was having a revolver came at a close distance and thereafter started firing resulting in three bullet injuries. The petitioner thereafter fled from the spot. In view of nature of allegations and the stage of trial, I am of the considered view that petitioner is not entitled to concession of bail. The petition is devoid of merit and is hereby dismissed. April 27, 2011 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE