IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20962 of 2009 BABLU YADAV @ BABLU KUMAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 02.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This is a case of misuse of privilege of bail. Petitioner was granted bail on merit sometimes in the year 2001. He remained present in court till 2004 and thereafter he absconded. It appears that he surrendered on 17.01.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner with reference to the several averments made in the bail application tried to convince this court that there were circumstances beyond his control that prevented him from appearing in Court. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the learned Sessions Judge has already granted him liberty to renew prayer for bail after examination of the witnesses who was in attendance on 20.07.2001. This court, having regard to the said observation only observes that the said witness should be examined on behalf of the prosecution on or before 10th of August 2009, failing which the court below shall release him on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Begusarai in connection with Sahebpur Kamal P.S.Case no.130/2000. In the event the petitioner is granted bail in terms 2 of the aforesaid order, the same shall be subject to the following conditions: (a) One of the bailors should be the own/close family member of the petitioner. (b) The petitioner shall appear in person on the date fixed at the trial. In the event of default in such appearance on any date without sufficient/cogent reasons, the trial court shall have liberty to cancel his bail bond and secure his arrest in accordance with law. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)