IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU WRIT PETITION NO : 10237 of 2000 Between: Rajendra Kumar Gupta Rep. by its Director, Rajendra Kumar Gupta, M/s. K.P. Steels Ltd., Sy.No.280, Kallakal Village, Toopran Mandal, Medak District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Transmission Corporation of A.P. Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintending Engineer, Operation Circle, Central Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd., Medak at Sangareddy. 3 The Senior Accounts Officer, Operation Circle, Central Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd., Medak at Sangareddy. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the letter No.SE/OP/MDK/SAO/HT/D.No. 85/2000 dated 4-5-2000 of the 3rd respondent as highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust and consequently set aside the same and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.D.V.NAGARJUNA BABU Counsel for the Respondent No.: MRS.NANDA R. RAO The Court made the following : HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE G. YETHIRAJULU Writ Petition No.10237_2000 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to declare that the letter No.SE/OP/MDK/SAO/HT/D.No.85/2000, dated 4.5.2000 issued by the third respondent as highly illegal and arbitrary unjust, consequently to set aside the same. A batch of writ petitions was disposed of by this Court on 8.8.2008. This matter is also one of the matters in the said batch, but it was omitted due to over sight. By following the judgment in W.P.No.8444 of 2003 & Batch this writ petition is allowed by holding that the demand notices issued by the respondents are illegal and they are hereby set aside. The respondents are at liberty to issue fresh demand notices after working out the amount towards fuel costs adjustment as indicated in W.P.No.8444 of 2003 and batch. The order in W.P.No.8444 of 2003 & Batch may be made part of this order. No order as to costs. _______________________ Dr. Justice G. Yethirajulu Date: 04.12.2008 mrb