-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO.8166 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1536 OF 199 WRIT PETITION NO.1536 OF 199 WRIT PETITION NO.1536 OF 1999 1. Sahebrao Gulabrao Dhamale, since deceased, through his L.Rs 1A. Shankar Sahebrao Dhamale & ors. .. Applicants Vs 1. The Special Land Acquisition Officer No.1 and ors. .. Respondent Mr.Sachin Manale h/f Mr Suresh S.Pakale, for the applicants. Mr P.M.Patil, AGP for respondent nos 1 to 5. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. DATE : APRIL 24, 2006. DATE : APRIL 24, 2006. DATE : APRIL 24, 2006. PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard. 2. By this application, it has been pointed out that respondent no.6, i.e. Maruti Nathu Dalavi died on 12.7.1999 and, therefore, when writ petition no.1536 of 1999 was filed before this Court he could not have been impleaded as respondent no.6 and more so when his L.Rs,i.e. respondent nos. 7 to 10 were already on record. It is further stated that respondent no.9 died on 4.3.2006 and, therefore, his L.Rs shown as respondent nos.9A to 9D, are required to be impleaded. 3. So far as respondent no.9 is concerned, the application has been filed in time and no separate -2- application is required to be filed for bringing L.Rs of the deceased respondent no.6 as they are already impleaded in the writ petition. 4. The application is, therefore, allowed in terms f prayer clauses (a) and (b). The petition memo be amended accordingly within a period of two weeks and the petition be listed in the final hearing board in due course. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)