1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Bail Application No. 7656/2010 Mausam Khan Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 19.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Anurag Sharma - for the petitioner Mr Amit Poonia - Public Prosecutor Mr Azad Ahmed – for complainant BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that injured has received only one injury. Thus, there was no intention to cause offence under section 307 IPC. There is a contradiction in the initial medical report and subsequent reports though it has been dealt with by the learned trial court. However, same is a subject matter to the trial. Petitioner has surrendered before the court below. Whatever recovery was to be effected by the police, has been given effect to. Looking to the aforesaid, petitioner may be granted bail. Learned Public Prosecutor as also learned counsel for complainant have opposed the bail application. 2 After considering rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am of the view that petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is accepted and it is directed that accused-petitioner namely; Mausam Khan may be enlarged on bail under section 439 CrPC in FIR No. 103/2010 registered at Police Station –Kishangarhbas, Alwar for offence under Section/s 323, 307 and 341 IPC provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.40,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma