IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 11TH AUGUST 2011 / 20TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 18394 of 2011(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- B.S.CHANDY, WORKER (HIGHER GRADE), FITTER HOUSE SECTION, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, WATER WORKS CAMPUS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY ADV. SMT.SREEDEVI KYLASANATH SMT.SHALEENA RAJAN SMT.S.PREETHA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, JALA BHAVAN, VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, OFFICE OF THE KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER WORKS CENTRAL SUB DIVISION, VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 4. THE FINANCE MANAGER & CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER, JALA BHAVAN, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. ADV. SMT.AMBIKA DEVI, SC, KWA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 18394 of 2011(Y) APPENDIX PETITONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 27.7.2007 IN W.P.(C)36042/2003. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 4.8.2007 FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO.KWA/JB/E.13/2388/07 DATED 18.4.2008. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 16.7.2008 OF 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 25.3.2009 SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER. EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 10.6.2010 OF 1ST RESPONDENT SANCTIONING PETITIONER'S LEAVE WITHOUT ALLOWANCE. EXT.P7: TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION NO.CSDN/E5/1280/2011 DATED 26.5.2011 OF 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P8: TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO.PHDN-T/T/JS/4636/06 DATED 18.6.2011 OF 2ND RESPONDENT. // TRUE COPY // TKS P.S. TO JUDGE C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. ---------------------------- W.P.(C)No.18394 of 2011 ---------------------------- Dated 11th August, 2011 JUDGMENT This writ petition has been filed mainly with the prayer to issue a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 1 and 2 to disburse the arrears due to the petitioner as is evident from Ext.P8. When this matter is taken up for consideration today, the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the amount payable to the petitioner in the light of Ext.P8 would be disbursed within a period of two weeks. The said submission is recorded and this writ petition is disposed of, accordingly. Sd/- C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge TKS