IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI WRIT PETITION NO : 20509 of 1994 Between: 1 Pydiparthi Swami Naidu S/o.Suryarao R/o.Katrenipadu Razole Mandal E.G.Dist 2 Pydiparthi Satyanarayana Murthy S/o. Narasimha Murthy R/o.Katrenipadu Razole Mandal E.G.Dist ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The District Collector, Kakinada E.G.Dist 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Amalapuram, E.G.Dist 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Razole, E.G.Dist 4 Adabala Sri Ramakrishnaji S/o.Ramarao Katrenipadu Razole Mandal, E.G.Dist .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction especially in the nature of writ of mandamus directing respondents 1 and 2 to conduct an enquiry through an officer not below the rank of an Revenue Divisional Officer into the allegations against the 4th respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.V.L.N.GOPALA KRISHNA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: GP for Revenue Counsel for the Respondent No.4: Mr.Y.Rama Rao The Court made the following Order: W.P.No.20509 of 1994 When the matter has come up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous and he has made an endorsement to that effect on the Court bundle. Recording the above submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ___________ 05-08-2004 rkk To 1 The District Collector, Kakinada, E.G.Dist 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Amalapuram, E.G.Dist 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Razole, E.G.Dist 4 Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court buildings, (OUT) 5. Two CD copies.