IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1628 of 2007 AFROZ ALI Versus ANAWAR ALI ----------- 3 29/8/2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. On his own showing of the petitioner he is responsible for swearing a false affidavit. In the affidavit which has been filed in this case at page-9 it has been mentioned that his age is 32 years. The impugned order would go to show that he had declared his age in the court below for claiming maintenance with the date of birth as 28.2.1985. In that view of the matter as the petitioner has not approached this Court with clean hands, he does not deserve to be given any relief, and accordingly this civil revision application is fit to be dismissed. Even otherwise today taking the date of birth of the petitioner in the year 1985 to be correct, he is adult aged about 23 years and therefore, he must work to earn his maintenance. He cannot pray for maintenance from his father. This application being devoid of any merit is dismissed. ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J. ) Abhay Kumar