IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT TUESDAY, THE 11TH DECEMBER 2007 / 20TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 Crl.MC.No. 3248 of 2007() ------------------------- OS.182/1995 of MUNSIFF'S COURT, MAVELIKKARA .................... PETITIONER: ------------ 1. N.MADHAVA PANICKER, VATTATHIL, CHUNAKKARA NORTH MURI, CHUNAKKARA VILLAGE, MAVELIKKARA TALUK. 2. P.THULASI, W/O.N.MADHAVAN PANICKER, VATTATHIL, CHUNAKKARA NORTH MURI, CHUNAKKARA VILLAGE, MAVELIKKARA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.K.RAVEENDRAN SMT.C.A.SEENA RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHENGANNUR. 3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE, MAVELIKKARA. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KURATHIKKAD. 5. PARAMESWARA PANICKER, VATTATHIL HOUSE, CHUNAKKARA, VADAKKUM MURI, CHUNAKKARA VILLAGE, MAVELIKKARA TALUK - 690 555. 6. MALAYIL VEETTIL MOHANAN, CHUNAKKARA, VADAKKUM MURI, CHUNAKKARA VILLAGE, MAVELIKKARA TALUK - 690 555 Crl.MC.No. 3248 of 2007 - 2 - 7. VALAYYATH VEETTIL B.BINU, CHUNAKKARA, VADAKKUM MURI, CHUNAKKARA VILLAGE, MAVELIKKARA TALUK - 690 555. 8. VALLATTIL VEETTIL CHANDRIKA, CHUNAKKARA, VADAKKUM MURI, CHUNAKKARA VILLAGE, MAVELIKKARA TALUK - 690 555. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.GIKKU JACOB THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT, J ------------------------------------ Crl.M.C.No.3248 of 2007 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of December, 2007 O R D E R The short grievance of the petitioners in this Crl.M.C was only that no action has been taken on the basis of Annexure-XIII complaint submitted by the petitioners to the 4th respondent. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor on behalf of the 4th respondent submitted that no such complaint whatsoever has been received by the 4th respondent. The petitioners were granted time to produce material if any to show that such complaint has been filed. The learned counsel for the petitioners now submits that there is nothing to show that such a complaint has been filed, but a fresh complaint has been filed requesting further action. In the light of that submission, I am satisfied that no further directions are necessary in this Crl.M.C. 3. This Crl.M.C is accordingly dismissed. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) rtr/- 2