1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8675 OF 2007 Dr.Yadnyavalkya Krishnaji Thombare.. Petitioner Vs. Shri Vijay Pandurang Jadhav and Ors. .. Respondents Mr.S.G.Kudle for the petitioner Mr.S.A.Khan i/b M/s.Judicature for the respondent nos.1 Mr.V.P.Malvankar, A.G.P. for the respondent nos.2 CORAM : J.N.PATEL CORAM : J.N.PATEL CORAM : J.N.PATEL & & & SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DATED : 15TH JANUARY, 2008 DATED : 15TH JANUARY, 2008 DATED : 15TH JANUARY, 2008 P.C.: 1. The petitioner has approached this court challenging the order of suspension dated 14th June, 2007 issued by respondent nos.1 and the initiation of the enquiry proceedings. 2. By communication dated 14th June, 2007 which is made in this petition, the petitioner came 2 to be suspended on charges which are spelt in the said letter of suspension numbering 11 which are of serious nature. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner mainly based his challenge on the propriety of the Managing Committee of the trust in issuing a suspension order. It is contended by him that the Managing Committee is not properly constituted in accordance with the bye-laws of the trust and, therefore, have no powers to suspend the petitioner. 4. It is not disputed that till the letter of suspension was issued and even as on today, no competent forum has held against the Managing Committee being not competent to act as such. 5. We do not find that merely because the petitioner has certain reservation about the eligibility about members of the Managing Committee and he may be justified in saying so, that by itself will not come in the way of the Managing Committee in proceeding against the petitioner in 3 accordance with the rules and regulations governing the service conditions with the respondent institution. 6. Mr.Kudle, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that there is another petition filed by members of the trust who fall in the category of life members challenging the constitution of the Managing Committee. Well, that’s a different issue. We, therefore, do not find any merits in the petition. The same is dismissed. ( J.N. PATEL, J ) ( J.N. PATEL, J ) ( J.N. PATEL, J ) ( SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J ) ( SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J ) ( SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J )