IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3468 OF 2004 OF MOTION NO.3468 OF 2004 OF MOTION NO.3468 OF 2004 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL (L) NO. 801 OF 2004 (L) NO. 801 OF 2004 (L) NO. 801 OF 2004 IN IN IN SUMMONS SUMMONS SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 126 OF 2003 FOR JUDGMENT NO. 126 OF 2003 FOR JUDGMENT NO. 126 OF 2003 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3699 OF 2002 SUIT NO. 3699 OF 2002 SUIT NO. 3699 OF 2002 K.K.Saraf .. Applicant V/s Neelam Manohar Chandnani .. Respondent ----- Sou.Mamata Sadh i/b. V. Deshpande & Co. for the Applicant. Shri.Vipul Shukla for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.VAZIFDAR, S.J.VAZIFDAR, S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 10TH MARCH, 2006. : 10TH MARCH, 2006. : 10TH MARCH, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant and the learned Counsel for the Respondent. By this Notice of Motion, the Applicant is seeking condonation of 45 days delay. Perused the Notice of Motion and the affidavit-in-support thereof. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Applicant. Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause(a). (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)