IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15378 of 2010 1. REKHA KUMARI W/O JANNU PRASAD SINGH R/O VILL.- DINDAYALPUR MAHACHAK, P.S.- SAHKUND, DISTT.- BHAGALPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE MEMBER DISTRICT TEACHER APPOINTMENT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BHAGALPUR 3. THE MUKHIA DINDAYALPUR GRAM PANCHAYAT, P.S.- SAHKUND, DISTT.- BHAGALPUR 4. PANCHAYAT SECRETARY DINDAYALPUR GRAM PANCHAYAT, P.S.- SAHKUND, DISTT.- BHAGALPUR 5. BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER SAHKUND BLOCK, P.S.- SAHKUND, DISTT.- BHAGALPUR 6. PIYUSH KUMARI D/O BIJAY KANT JHA R/O VILL.- BHUDHARNI, P.S.- SAHKUND, DISTT.- BHAGALPUR ----------- 02. 29.04.2011 Annexure-1 is the order passed by the appellate authority, Bhagalpur in Case No. 18 of 2010. Dispute related to appointment of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra for the year 2005 for Gram Panchayat Dindayalpur, in the district of Bhagalpur. The issue was raked up by the petitioner with regard to the appointment made in the Panchayat on the various posts of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra and the dispute which emerged with regard to such appointment when certain breach of roaster clearance was alleged and appointments made. The appellate authority after going through the order and the factual matrix dismissed the case of Piyush Kumari as being devoid of any merit. So far as claim of the petitioner is concerned, it was found that she was appointed against a backward class quota instead of extremely backward class and therefore, her appointment too was terminated. In this background that the 2 writ has been filed. The first contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that since tribunal bas been constituted in the year 2006, they have no authortity to look into the matter of appointments of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra where cause of action arose in 2005. This contention of the counsel is fit to be dismissed on the face of it. Vide notification issued by the State of Bihar the appellate authority has been vested with powers to look into the disputes of past, present and future so long the tribunal exits. So far as other contention that Panchayat Sukh Subidha Samiti had recommended for appointment of the petitioner on due application of mind, is concerned, there is a clear finding that the Panchayat Sukh Subidha Samiti did not follow the roaster clearance and appointments came to be made against the reservation not meant for the candidates to which they belonged. Even otherwise the adjudication made by the appellate authortity is more academic as no direction in any way can be passed for either retaining or dismissal of such disputes, specially because after 2006 Rules came into play, there are no posts of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra in existence after 1.7.2007. The writ application has no merit. It is dismissed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)