IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.4989 of 2000 Between: R. Srinivasulu, S/o. Ananthaiah, R/o L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Labour Court, Rep. by its Presiding Officer 4th Floor, Chandravihar Building, M.J.Road, Hyderabad. 2 The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C. Bus Depot Narkatpally, Nalgonda District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or direction particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF CERTIORARI and quash the impugned award dated 31-7-1999 made in I.D.No.75/95 published on 20-12-1999 in not granting any relief prayed in I.D as arbitrary, unjust and in violation of Articles 14,16 & 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent Corporation to reinstate the petitioner into service with continuity of service with full backwages in the interest of justice and fair play. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. G. Rama Sarma Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following Order: This writ petition was posted on 29-01-2009 for final hearing. As there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, it was posted to 30-01-2009 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Although the writ petition was listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, an adjournment was sought. Thereafter, when it was listed on 02-02-2009 and was taken up for hearing, it was represented by Sri P.V.S. Chakravarthy, learned counsel representing Sri G. Rama Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner, that the sole petitioner died and time was sought for taking steps. Hence, the matter was adjourned to today. Even today, when the writ petition is taken up, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner and no necessary steps are also taken pursuant to the order dated 02-02-2009. In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. _____________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J. February 16, 2009 MRR