é) m Hm HIGH CQURI OFJUDICATURE CHHAT’HSGARH AT BILASP‘UR w Wnft Patitian Mg92 é! 2901 M Petitiuner : Chhattiggarh Pradesh Shikghak Congress, having its ‘1'egigtration No.36 through its Srliice President Tehsil Pendra Road, V.P.Praka$h Chandra Rai S/o Uma Shankar Raj aged about 46 years R/o Oppofsite GraminBmlk,Pendra, ‘ Versus 1. Smte of Chhattjggarh, Through : Its Principal Sacretzuy, General Administration Department, D.K.Bhawan, Raipur ‘ (C. G.) 2. General Administrative Department, Chhattisgarh Mantralaym D.K.Bhawan Raipur—(CAGJ 3. Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Raipur—(C.G.) 4. Secretary, Trihal Weifare Depaxtmeiit, Govtof Chhattiagarh Mantralaya, D.K.Bhawan, Raipur~ (CG) Addl. Callector Tram 'the Ogice of Collector (Adhivasi VikaS Biiaspur) 'WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2&6912’? OF THE CONSTHUTION OF INDEA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI5GARH AT BILASPUR 3.3. : Hon’bl¢ &r. Safish .. _._s.”_____‘_L K. A iho'l'ri ’ W. P, No. 1926 of 2001 Mr. P. Diwakar'; Senior Advocafe wi'rh Mr. PR. Pafankari Advocate for fhe pefi-Honer. Mr. U?karsh Vevma, Dy. Govt Advoca're for me respondents/51am. ORDER (Passed on fhis 21" day of February, 2007) 1. Learned counsei appearing for The pe‘ri‘rioner, on instrucfion, seeks for permission of this Court 1’0 withdraw +his petition, having become infructuous, to which learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State has no objection. 2. It is ordered accordingly. 3. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. ”W Sdl- satish K. Agnihotri ‘ Judge l ’ Pe'ri‘rioner Chhaf‘risgarh Prad¢sh shikshak Congress versus Respondents : Sfa-re of Chhafrisgarh and ofhers