IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.417 of 2010 1. ARUN KUMAR GUPTA @ ARUN KUMAR SAH S/O RAJ KUMAR SAH R/O VILL.- AMARI KUKRAUN, P.S.- DHAMDAHA, DISTT.- PURNEA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. ----------- 02. 12.08.2010 The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 01.06.2006 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea by which he has taken cognizance under Sections 285 and 286 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. The petitioner prays for quashing on the ground that the petitioner was not the owner of the premises concerned and he is in fact a government servant and even the District Magistrate in a proceeding held that there was no illegality and therefore articles were released in favour of the son of the petitioner. In my view, these aspects can not be considered at this stage. In view of such, this application is dismissed. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)