Lo (9 ('SJ ,3 •2^7^' BEFOKE THE MADHY& PRAI3ESH SSAT2 M)MINIS®BA2IVE SRIBUMAL, <J&BftE,PVR. O^Ao No.^^:^ Of |«36 BETWEEEt-l B afoad^ir Singh Tomar ^J® State of M»P^ aad ot&ers ^<»• &@plica^t ^lo^ Respondeats PARtriG'@EARS ©FTiiE APPLICATIOH 1 o PartiGulars faf t;fae ap^lieaiit apb Name ©fthe appliGa^t b ^ Father * s Mame c^ l^ge of theapplicaat $ Bahadur Simgli Somar $ B«S» Soaar t 55 years _^^-._ d» ©esigaati^oiaand worldLn@ i®the s Head Goast.sMe», effice ~ £© lice Xiiae^ re^fdalpur, e» Mdress for seryice of aotice t Same as above<, 2»r Eartieulars of tMe res^oMdeafes f a» State of Madhya Pradesh^ tlsro^gia Secretary» ®e@tt«of Hoaae ^ffN-rs^i VallabM BfoavaB, BMopal. bo Beputy iMspector ©e^eral©fPolice®rjjaiMRange^ ITjjaiB. c^ S^>eriBt.eMdent ©fPoiice MaBdsasrar^ a. Shri Blioopendra Siagh^ R.I<»,» EEiqidLry ©ff±©er, Police I^iaes^ Maadsaxar^ Tl HIGH_COuRT^OF CHHATTISGARH :_B$LASPUR PET1TIQNER Bahadur Singh Tomar RESPONDENTS Versus Stats of M.P. & Others Singie Sench : Hon3ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotrl/J. Present:- None for the petitioner. Shri A.V. Sridhar, Panei Lawyer fcr the State. (Passed on this 18- day of November, 2009) The matter is caSied for hearing twice. On occasions, none appears nor Is any representatlon made on behaif of the petitioner. The petltloner may not be interested In the matter. 2) In view of the above, the wrlt petltlon is dlsr'nlssed for of prosecution. Reglstry Is to send a copy of 'thls order io the peiitionerforthwith. Amlt Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge