IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10625 of 2009 ANIL YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 15.9.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Petitioner is one of the persons who has been named as conspirators in killing of the deceased who happened to be the sitting Mukhiya, namely, Malo Devi. In this connection Kudaganj P.S. Case No. 43 of 2008 has been instituted under several sections of the Indian Penal including sections 323, 307, 302, 379 and 120B. What has emerged from the FIR is that earlier the husband of Malo Devi was murdered and the present petitioner is supposed to be in custody in connection with the said case. In the present case it is alleged that pressure is being brought on Malo Devi to compromise the matter which will facilitate the present petitioner to come out from jail. It has also come during investigation that telephone calls also made to put pressure on the deceased to compromise the case. This is a case where the husband and the wife have been eliminated where the petitioner happens to be a named accused in both matters. In view of above serious allegations, even if allegation of conspiracy was levelled against this petitioner in this case, he does not deserve to be enlarged on bail. The prayer for bail is rejected. It is a fit case where the trial should be expedited so that the actual culprit is brought to book. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)