HI6H COURT OP CHHATTtSftftRH AT BILASPUR W. P.fS) No. 1833 »f2007 Petitioner Respondents Versus Mukesh Kumor Mandwi Age daout 38 year, Asstt. Tencher S/o Shri Mehtterram Mandavi Primary School Ichheyur Btock - Knnker, Distt. - Kanker (C.®.) 1. Stflrt-e 6ovt. of Chhattisgorh, Through Secretory, Tribal Welfore Oepartment & Education Department, &.K.S. Bhawan, Oisn.-Roipur- (C.S.) 2. &istr'ict Education Officer, Kanker, Olstrict - Kwiker (C.fi.) 3. Block Educotion Officer, Knnker, Oistrict - Kanker (C.&.) 4. Treasure & Accounts Kenker District-Kanker (C.6.) SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. ^nihotrt, J •^' Present; Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Deepali Pandey, Panel Lawyer for the Stote/respondents. OR&ER 0>assed on this 29th &oy of March, 2007) 1. The question of l<u» inwlved herein asto whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from the dafe of completion of probation period. 2. Leorned counsel appeaping for the petitioner as well as for the Stote/respondents jointly submit that the focts and question of law invotved the present writ petition are the same to that of in W. P. (S) No. 58/2007 (P<ras Noth Supta vs. State of Chhanisga-h & others), which was oltowed vide order dsted 15.01.2007. 3. In view of the above-stated submissions made by leorned counsel for the parties, tiie writ petition is allowed in the sane terms. No order <K to costs. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge Subhash