1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Letters Patent Appeal No. 55 of 2011 in Writ Petition No. 4037 of 2010 (d) Ravindra Wasudeo Kaskhedikar VERSUS The Assistt. Charity Commissioner, Nagpur and another - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. B. G. Kulkarni, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. N. D. Khamborkar, Advocate for the respondent no.2 CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATE : JUNE 28, 2011. Heard. The case of the appellant that the respondent no.1-Assistant Charity Commissioner ought to have directed the entries in the Schedule-I to be modified so as to incorporate the period from 09/10/1995 till 26/6/1998, during which it was held that the Managing Committee of the respondent no.2, as a Secretary was in office, was rightly rejected by the Assistant Charity Commissioner, Nagpur and the learned Single Judge found that there was no reason to interfere with the order passed by the Assistant Charity Commissioner. The learned Single Judge observed that there were sufficient safeguards in the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 to check the attempts to abuse the entries made in Schedule-I. 2 Since, we do not find anything wrong with the entries made in the Schedule-I and the order passed by the respondent no.1-Assistant Charity Commissioner, the Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed with no orders as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE Diwale