C44) ’gwj/ ”CD gmgge gwwh IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (cs; WRIT PETITIGN (S) No. §§S‘$/0F 2009 PETITIONERS 1. /Shailesh Singh Somvanshi, S/o. S.S. Somvanshi, aged about 3O years, R/o. Mission Road, Teacher’s colony, Korba District Korba (C,G) ~Pankaj Kumar Kaushik, S/o J.P. Kaushik, aged about 34 years, R/.o. MIG 11/109, Ravishankar Nagar, Korba District Korba (CG) Laxmi Kumar Dadsena, S/o Munnalal Dadsena, aged about 27 years, R/o Sila Dehi, P.S. Bamnidih, Champ a, Distt. Janjgir— Champa (CG) Murli Manohar Dubey, S/o Shiv Balak Prasad Dubey, aged about 34 years, R/o village Hunkara, Tahsil Katghora, Korba, District Korba (C.G) Savita Gupta, D / o Chandrashekhar Gupta aged about 23 years, R/o Village Lata House No. 190, Ward No. 43, Post Kanipali, Korbna District Korba (C.G) Ku. Jyoti Shuka, D/o Satya Prakash Shukla, aged about 28 years, R/o SADA Colony, Niharika Talkies, Qr. No.1/23 Korba, District Korba (C.G) Pritesh Kumar Mishra, S/o Dilip Kumar Mishra, aged about 28 years, R/o Q.No. 755/5/A, BALCO Nagar, Korba, District Korba (C.G) Mahendra Dubey, S/o Shiv Kumar Dubey, aged about 25 years, R/o Q.No. 11/174, Machadoli, (Bango), PO Machadoli, Korba, District Korba (C.G.) Daras Kumar Kurmi, S/ o Ganga Ram Kurmi aged about 34 years, R/o Banki 2, Post Office Bankimongra, Korba, District Korba (C.G) Padma Dewangan D / o Komal Prasad Dewangan, aged about 21 years, R/o MD/113, Dipka ’ Colony, SECL, Gevra Project, Korba District Korba (C.G) Shailendra Srivas S / o Yogeshwar Srivas, aged about 25 years, R/ o Kusmunda, ia Champa, Dist. Janjgir—Champa (C.G) Ram Swaroop Srivas S/o Shivramial, aged about 26 years, R/o M. 44 Katainar, J Post Banki Mongra Korba, District Korba (C.G.) Smt. Lalita Tiwari, W/o Anupam Kurnar Tiwari, aged about 31 years, R/o Irrigation Colony, Qr. No. 1/5, Champa, Dist. Janjgir— Champa (C.G) Smt. Santosh Soni, W/o Mohan Kishore Soni, aged about 39 years, R/o Halwai Chowk, Baloda, District Janjgir—Champa (C.G) Haneef Khan Musalman S/o Rashid Khan Muslaman, aged about 26 years, R/o Dadarkala, Korba District Korba (C.G) V Sana Ullah Khan S/o Mohammad Ismail Khan, aged about 27 years, R/o vill Post Baisma, Korba, District Korba (C.G) VERSUS 1 State of Chhattisgarh K“ Through the Secretaly, Department of Panchayat and Rural Welfare, D.K.S. Building Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G) Collector, Korba, Dist. Korba (C.G) 3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila " Panchayat, Korba, District Korba (C.G) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Korba, Dist. Korba (C.G) RESPONDENTS Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Podiuproda Korba, District Korba (C.G) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA M HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition ‘S! No. 5555 0f 2009 Pctitioners Shailesh Singh Somvanshi 65 others Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & others WRIT PETHON UNDER ARTICLE 225 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOF INDIA. (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihom' J.) r Shri A. V. Shridhar, Advocate for the patitioners. Shri Alok Bakshj, Govt. Advocate for the respondents No. 1_, 2 85 4. o R D E R {Oran Passed on this 25th day of September, 2009 Heard; 1. The petitioners have filed this petirion seeking a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioners for appointment to the post of Shiksha Karmi Grade III in Janpad Panchayat Podiuproda, as per their serial number in the waiting list. 2. Earlier the petitioners had filed W.P.(S)No. 3968/2009, seeking for the same relief, as has been sought for in this petition. On 30.7.2009 the W.P.(S) No. 396812009 Was dismissed as Withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to file representation before the respondent No.5. 3. There were 16 representations submitted by each of the petitioners, separately. The respondent No.5 has decided the representations of the petitioners by 16 separate orders dated 26.8.2009. The petitioners have tiled this petition clubbing all the cagsegof action together, which is not permissible in law. 4. On perusal of the orders dated 26.8.2009 it appears that since the process of selection is pending before the scrutiny committee and no recommendation has been made for appomtment of any I .. . candidate, no order of appointment in case of the petitioner could be passed. The orders seem to be just and proper. Even otherwise, the petitioners in this petition have not challenged the order dated 26.8.2009, passed on their representations and they have repeated the same prayer, as was made in the earlier W.P.(S) No. 3968/2009. This is not permissible in law. x 5. Since the earlier petition was Withdrawn with liberty and the petitioners have not impugned the order passed on their representations, this petition is not maintainable. However, looking from all angles, considering the merits of the ease, the petition is premature at this stage asthe process of selection has not been complete and no appointment order has been issued in case of any candidate as scrutiny of the documents is in progress by the committee. 6. In view of the foregoing, this writ petition is dismissed. I bkiSdF _ "Satish.K.Agnihotri r: > 1 Thakur