u 31%;? 2mm BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.No. 4—4! L moot, /I;ala Ram Sahu, aged about 36 years, son of Shri Bhoklu Ram Sahu, resident of village Semariya, Post — Kanhera, Tah. Bemetara, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of health and Family Welfare, Mantralay, D.K.S. Bhawan Building, Raipur (CG) RESPONDENTS 2. The State of Madhya Pradesh, through z Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Mantralay, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal. The Board of Ayurvedic and Unani, System 'of Medicine and Naturopathy, (MP), through : the Registrar Shyamla Hills, Bhopal (MP) The Chhattisgarh Board of Ayurvedic and Unani system of Medicine and Naturopathy, Raipur (Chhattigarh) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226(227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMI§ CERTIORARI QUO WARRANTO. W XI-HC—~78 . EWWW Havmg neard Leamecx coun‘ facts and cucum$tanc€S 01 the ca‘ 'emibilment form t0 petitioner and ascertain and examine the Claim r a‘ rjeeisicn about the eligibility of judgmeht paesed by MP. High Cm Wiih the aibresaid direction Censequently, M.W‘P.No.47 Certified Cap}; as per rules. 1&22005 , ‘ $111‘i RP. Sahu, counsal for the pctitioner, Smt Fouzia‘ Miria, Papal ver fOf thF Stata. _hr= pctltlmwr has pr?tcr1€ thxs wrlt petltmn undcr Exrhc l 826/727 cf ' y ‘ i: Lonstltutlo’; of India questm mg the actlcn 0f raRpondEHt NO 4 Whacbv ponaém Na 4 had rafuacd LG pplv €nr011m?nt Lor‘n t0 thE patlt onar gar pumas€ 0f appiymg Ior raglstr man an Avulvailc pract1L1D €r w \ Km? LaS ma pPtmoner is that hF hd 1 acqu rad quahfnauon m VaJrlva > fxSllJad fro nd1 Sahltva San'n’mian Pravag, wmch was lebegmznd undcl I . \ m 1 te Adhmwam, 1Q7O but bv not mauon daLed 4 ll 89, Lhe sand recmfnmon. ' was mthdrawn With effect £10m 4 11 89 The Claim oi the petitioner ts that he i ‘ ‘ i ()bminyd the degree before 4 1i 8C and smce then he 13 pracvcmn alld‘ ‘ theretore. when he etarted the p acuce, the degree was recogmze'l Fur*her clalm of the Detmoner 1% that m Wm Penman Nox287/90 aetween :7 ”a? eught to have euppiied the me Ixgnt OI Juqgment passed 13V M hqht bf the Judgment 0t M P H qh pout? m exhar Jam v< btate 01 M P , ieeponqent alla COHSIQF‘I‘ {1'16 Past; DI tl'iE DFIUUOVIEI‘ 1n K P High Court Annexure i —‘ tor rhe parties an'i having rrgamtto the , r spondent No 4 1s chrecteri to aunpw the alter xeceivmg the 101m. “esnonuent \io 4 to ' h vistraticn in the Jbm (ii ‘ e petitioner anti thereafter to Lcl‘e he eetitiener for Lrt 1n WtP. bio/2o: $10. ,4 _ the pe ition Stands dispCSrtt U1 59/04 also stand. etisposeu f. ,9, L w i Es u ‘ é F L h t h f c ‘ ‘ immNfWLiw In zoo m an few I l i l mm (Wu) ‘ m :1 eam $Wm