IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR CRL.P.No.4344 OF 2011 Date:13.06.2011 Between:- Vaddi Swathi (wrongly mentioned as Jyothi) .. Petitioner/Accused And The State of A.P., through S.H.O., Mummidivaram Police Station, East Godavari District, Rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad and another. ..Respondents ORDER:- The petitioner is stated to be the accused in Crime No.55 of 2011 of Mummidivaram Police Station of East Godavari District. 2. The petitioner is a lady aged about 25 years and she is said to have studied M.Sc., and has appeared for Preliminary Civil Services Examination held yesterday. The de facto complainant is said to be the petitioner’s paternal aunt’s daughter. It appears that there is a civil litigation pending. However, the allegations made in the complaint are that the petitioner, in the absence of the de facto complainant, trespassed into her coconut garden and committed theft of coconuts. 3. The petitioner’s Counsel states that these are false allegations and therefore, the First Information Report should be quashed. 4. It is difficult to accept this contention. It may be noted that whether the F.I.R. is true or false in a case of this nature has to be decided on evidence, as the allegations do disclose the offences mentioned in it. 5. It may, however, be noted that as the petitioner is said to be an educated lady and preparing for Civil Services Examination, and having regard to the allegations made in the complaint/F.I.R., the police are directed to take a decision about her arrest after the completion of the investigation. 6. With the above direction, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. _____________________ N.RAVI SHANKAR, J 13th June, 2011 AMD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR CRL.P.No.4344 OF 2011 Date:13.06.2011 AMD