WP(C) 5100/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY The petitioner offered her candidature for MBBS admission for the Session 2010 b ut she failed to secure a seat, as she remained absent from the Counseling Sessi on held for the purpose of admission. The representation filed by the petitioner for giving her a 2nd chance was considered by the Director of Medical Education , Assam and by his order dated 3.9.2010 (wrongly noted as 3.8.2010) her represen tation was rejected in light of the relevant admission rules. However, it was al so recorded that if any vacancy arises within the time schedule prescribed by th e Medical Council of India, after considering the case of the Wait listed candid ates, her case may be considered. But the last date for medical admission prescribed by the Medical Council of Ind ia and the Supreme Court is already over and it is submitted by Mrs. A Verma, le arned Standing Counsel for the Director of Medical Education that no more seats are available and since the scheduled date for last admission is already over, t he case of the petitioner for her admission can not now be considered. She furth er submits that all the available seats have been filled up and the students are attending to their classes. In view of the above position, Mr. GN Sahewalla, learned Senior Counsel appearin g for the petitioner submits that this case be closed with a direction that if a ny further seat becomes available and admission is permissible in terms of the a ssurance recorded in the order of the Director of Medical Education, Assam, the petitioner’s case may then be considered. Having regard to the fact that the petitioner was absent from the Counseling Se ssion and she was therefore not considered for admission, I see no reason to kee p this matter pending in Court particularly in view of the fact that the last da te for admission is already over on 30.9.2010. However, if any extension of the admission schedule is considered and if any seat becomes remains after accommoda ting the Wait listed candidates, the case of the petitioner may be considered al ong with other similarly situated persons. This case is disposed of accordingly.