1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 48. CA/9622/2008 In FAST/16721/2008 WITH CA/9623/2008 In FAST/16721/2008 WITH CA/9624/2008 In FAST/16717/2008 WITH CA/9625/2008 In FAST/16717/2008 WITH CA/9626/2008 In FAST/16713/2008 WITH CA/9627/2008 In FAST/16713/2008 WITH CA/9628/2008 In FAST/16664/2008 WITH CA/9629/2008 In FAST/16664/2008 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr.Ruturaj Patil, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. B.K.Pawar, Adv., for respondent no.1. Mr. D.V.Tele, AGP, for respondent no.2. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:9-2-2010 2 P.C.:- 1. Heard Mr.Patil, Counsel for the acquiring body. There is delay of 235 days in filing the First Appeals. The respondent served, however, no participation. The acquiring body feels aggrieved by the award. The delay is occasioned due to taking legal opinion, seeking permission and sanction from the competent authority to challenge the impugned judgment and decree. The procedure has taken toll in the matter. The delay is not deliberate, sufficiently explained. The claim of the appellants will be scuttled if they are not heard in the matter on merits. Consequently, delay in each of the appeal is condoned. Respective applications for delay condonation allowed. 2. Mr. B.K.Pawar, Counsel, informs that the acquiring body has already deposited the amount which the claimants have partly withdrawn. In view of this, 3 respective awards and execution thereof in each stay application are stayed. Stay petitions disposed of in above terms. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/9622-08cagr