FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3953 OF 1996 _________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda | of Coram, appearances, Court's | Court's or Judge's orders orders or directions and | Registrar's orders | ________________________________|________________________________________ None for the petitioner Shri V.D.Hon, advocate for respondent no.1 .... Coram : Shrihari P.Davare, J. Dated : 06.07.2009 1. It is seen from the proceedings that on 21.4.2009 the counsel for the petitioner and the respondent made submission that there was possibility of settlement and sought adjournment. Hence, the matter was adjourned to 8.6.2009 2. However, on 8.6.2009 the parties and their respective counsel remained absent and since there was possibility of settlement between the parties as per submission made on earlier date, (2) matter was adjourned for four weeks for final hearing. 3. Accordingly the present Writ Petition has been listed today for final hearing. However, till 3.40 p.m. nobody remained present for the petitioner. Shri Hon, learned counsel for respondent no.1 submits that there are no chances of compromise. He also points out that there are concurrent findings of both the lower courts against the petitioner. 4. In view of the facts of the matter, since nobody appears for the petitioner, Writ petition stands dismissed in default. Interim order stands vacated. Rule stands discharged. In the circumstances, there shall be no order as to costs. (Shrihari P. Davare, J.) dbm/wp3953.96