IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 4TH JULY 2011 / 13TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 17757 of 2011(T) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- 1. TONY THOMAS MURICKAN (REG.NOS.90657, 211576), S/O.THOMAS, AGED 24 YEARS, MURICKAN HOUSE THALAYOLAPPARAMBU. 2. TOM JOSE PLATHOTTAM, S/O.P.M.THOMAS, AGED 23 YEARS, PLATHOTTAM HOUSE, CHERPUNKAL, PALA. 3. AJAY AUGUSTINE, (REG.NO.211551), S/O.AUGUSTINE XAVIER, AGED 23 YEARS, CHALLAVAYALIL HOUSE, ERATTUPETTA. 4. SYAM SUNDER, (REG.NO.211572), S/O.E.T.VENUGOPAL, AGED 24 YEARS, A-9 SAKTHI ENCLAVES, NEAR VAYANASAL BUS STAND, PERANDOOR ROAD, ELAMAKKARA, KOCHI-26. BY ADV. SRI.P.C.HARIDAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR-686001. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM-686001. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.SHAJI, SC., MG. UTY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 17751/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPIES OF THE RECEIPTS FOR REMITTANCE OF FESS FOR SCRUTINY AND REVALUATION OF ANSWER PAPERS OF THE 4TH SEMESTER OBTAINED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER. P2: COPIES OF APPLICATIONS FOR SCRUTINY OF THE PAPERS OF THE 4TH SEMESTER SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER. P3: COPIES OF THE APPALICATION FOR REVALUATION OF THE PAPERS OF THE 2ND SEMESTER (SUPPLEMENTARY)EXAMINATIONS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS 1, 3 AND 4. P4: COPY OF THE APPLICATIONS FOR SCRUTINYOF THE PAPERS OF THE 2ND SEMESTER SUPPLEMENTARY EXAMINATIONS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS 1 AND 3. P5: COPIES OF THE RECEIPTS EVIDENCING PAYMENT OF THE FEES FOR EXTS. P3 AND P4 APPLICATIONS. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J --------------------------------------- W.P(C) No.17757 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of July, 2011. J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed MBA Course. When the results of the 4th semester and 2nd semester supplementary examinations were declared, they had failed in some subjects. They applied for scrutiny and revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the scrutiny and revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the scrutiny of the answer paper within two weeks and the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for scrutiny and revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC ab JUDGE W.P(C) No.17510 of 2011-K 2