IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M 34853 of 2010 Date of decision: 14.12.2010 Parmod Kumar Vats ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.JS Hooda,Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Amandeep Singh, AAG, Haryana *** Ram Chand Gupta, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed by petitioner Parmod Kumar Vats under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure in case FIR No.227 dated 25.10.2010 registered under Section 308 read with Section 34 IPC at Police Station SGM Nagar, Faridabad. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. This Court while issuing notice of motion on 29.11.2010 passed the following order:- “Crl.M.No.61988 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M 34853 of 2010 Contends that alleged occurrence is of dated 23.7.2010 and however, FIR was lodged after about three months, i.e. 25.10.2010. Further contends that alleged injuries attributed to petitioner are with legs and fist blows. CRM No.M 34853 of 2010 -2- Notice of motion for 14.12.2010. However, petitioner is directed to join the investigation and in case he is arrested, he shall be released on interim bail by the Arresting Officer to his satisfaction subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has already joined the investigation pursuant to said order dated 29.11.2010. It has also been stated by learned counsel for the State that petitioner has joined the investigation and that he is no more required for any custodial interrogation. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, in view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of petitioner Parmod Kumar Vats is accepted and order dated 29.11.2010 granting interim bail in favour of the petitioner is, hereby, made absolute subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. December 14, 2010 (RAM CHAND GUPTA) gsv JUDGE