IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 25TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 31504 of 2011(K) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. AYISHA SHABNA M., AGED 22 YEARS, M.C. HOUSE, CHEVAYOOR P.O., VAZHAKKAD (VIA) MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. K.V. ATHUL GANESH, AGED 21 YEARS, 'SREEGAL' HOUSE, A.U.P. SCHOOL ROAD, MALAPPARAMBA, CALICUT. BY ADV. SRI.C.V.MANUVILSAN, SRI.P.G.SURESH, SRI.M.M.NIAS, SMT.K.VIDYA, SRI.RAJAN VISHNURAJ. RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY THE VICE CHANCELLOR, THENJIPALAM P.O., MALAPPURAM-673 635. 2. THE REGISTRAR OF EDUCATION, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENJIPALAM P.O., MALAPPURAM-673 635. 3. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENJIPALAM P.O., MALAPPURAM-673 635. BY ADV. MR.SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC, CALICUT UTY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/11/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs WP(C).No. 31504 of 2011(K) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1: A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE REVALUATION APPLICATION OF 1ST PETITIONER DATED 03/10/2011. EXHIBIT P2: A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE REVALUATION APPLICATION OF 2ND PETITIONER DATED 29/09/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 31504 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the examination was declared, they applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 3rd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/-