wagia @rgmch IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. 18) “$0M /2011 M Sanjay Kumar Baiga S/o Dev Kumar aged about 29 years, Cast Baiga, Working as Shiksha Karmi Grade — 3 Govt. Primary Belghiriya Block Marwahi Dist. Bilaspur C.G. PETITIONER VERSUSE x ....... RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhatishgarh through :- V The Secretary Department ofPanchayat & Rural Development , Mantralay, D.K.S. , Bhawan , Raipur C.G. 2./The Cast Scrutiny Committee , Pandit Ravishankar Vishvavidyalaya Parisar ’Raipur , Distt. Raipur C.G. / 3. The Chief Executive Officer , Janpad Panchayat Marwahi , Distt. Bilaspur C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER SECTION 226 OF THE M._C,.¢m-,x ‘ WW“ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA QNifdqm B : Hon’bie Shri Manindra iv‘l ‘ an $hrivastava. 11=ea=2m1 Shri Amit Kumar, couns l for the petitioner. Shri A.V. Shridhar} Pan l Lawverfort‘ne stare. The grievance of the _etitioner as stated in the petition is that the respondent authorities are re uiring the petitioner to produce reievant caste certificate duly verifTed by the High Level Caste Scrutiny Committee but so far enquiry before the Com Ittee is not complete and the matter is still pending. He further submits at the Committee has required the petitioner to submit various documents nd whatever information and documents are in possession of the petition r, have already been submitted. He further submits that for one reason r the other, the matter is stili pending before the Committee without final d cision and the petitioner is apprehending that the department may take disci Iinary action against him or may terminate for want of duly verified caste ce ticate. The learned State co nsei submitted that as the matter of caste scrutiny of the petitioner is pe ding before the Committee, the same will be decided according to law an the petitioner be directed to furnish ail the documents inciuding those documents which are demanded by the Committee from the petitioner From the pleadings and documents which are recorded, it is apparent that the enquiry with regard t the caste status of the petitioner is pending before the State Level Caste crutiny Committee and certain documents are . ...... ..... i S J. 3a mm, @mng,W glé umwm LOF C5>vw [7531/ 1H H 200 mm (161mm) l I' WWW Wmam Wawwh§®zhmw smzi emu trivia-Ker. r:mar.:ewm+ 5/; an“: ,rzm 1_.] 50,0” ankumkviiaa’ ammamia: mmm *2 , Wam fg€rm asamwm demanded from the petitioner and the petitioner submits that whatever documents are available, have been submitted. Bejthat as it may, the ccmmittee is required to decide the matter within a reasonable time. The petitioner shall place before the Committee all the information and docume ts which are in his possession within a period of month from today‘ T e department shall not take any coercive steps against the petitioner on ccount of non-submission of verified caste scrutiny certificate for further peripd of six months. With the aforesaid directio s, the petition is finally disposed off. l _w,_ l Sd/— i Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Deepii Judge