IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20371 of 2010 NAVIN KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04 21.07.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioner, who is husband, is facing charge punishable under Section 304B/34 of the Penal Code. Considering the allegation and the materials brought on record by the prosecution his prayer for bail was considered and rejected by order dated 05.08.2009 (Annexure-1). He was, however, granted liberty to renew prayer for bail after 09 months if the trial, in the meanwhile, is not taken up. A status report was called for which is on record at Flag-A. It appears therefrom that charges have been framed and summons have been issued for appearance of the witnesses. This Court is inclined to grant one more opportunity to the prosecution. Accordingly, while declining the prayer made for bail on behalf of the petitioner, this Court disposes of the present application in the following manner:- Let trial Court endeavour to examine all prosecution witnesses within 07 months from the date of receipt/communication of a copy of this order in the Court below failing which trial Court shall release the petitioner, named above, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge, Patna City, in connection with 2 Gaurichak P.S.Case no. 104 of 2008 corresponding to Sessions Trial no. 484 of 2010, subject to the following two conditions: (i) One of the bailors should be the own/close family member of the petitioner. (ii) Petitioner shall appear in person before trial Court on each date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates trial Court shall cancel the bail bond(s) of the petitioner and secure his arrest in accordance with law. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)