IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11072 of 2010 VIVEKANAND THAKUR S/O LATE KANTI PRASAD THAKUR R/O VILL LOUK, LOUKI, P.O.LOUK LOUKI, P.S.GODDA, DISTT-GODDA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. CHIEF SECRETARY BIHAR, PATNA 3. DIRECTOR NON FORMAL EDUCATION BIHAR, PATNA 4. DIRECTOR , SUPPLY & COMMERCE DEPARTMENT PATNA 5. ACCOUNTANT GENERAL BIHAR, PATNA 6. FINANCE COMMISSIONER, PENSION CELL 7. DIRECTOR PROVIDENT FUND BIHAR, PATNA 8. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER MADHORA, SARAN , CHAPRA 9. DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER PURNEA 10. THE DISSTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, SARAN, CHAPRA. ----------- 02. 20.07.2010 As prayed for learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to add the District Provident Fund Officer, Saran, Chapra. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, State as also the Accountant General A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent no. 9. It is submitted that petitioner upon his superannuation on 29th of February 2008 as Supply Inspector from the office of the respondent no. 8, the provident fund dues as also the payment on account of leave encashment has not been finally settled and paid. It is further submitted that the gratuity although has been paid but not on the revised scale. 2 Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submits that the averments made in the writ application as also the representation filed by the petitioner as contained in Annexure – 2 is not clear. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 8. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and the admitted dues could also be paid along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)