IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6859 of 2011 NISHANT KUMAR, S/O-NARENDRA PRASAD AGRAWAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 20.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is husband of the deceased. The post-mortem report corroborates this fact that burn injury had been found on the person of the deceased. Although, learned counsel for the petitioner tried to convince me that being patient of schizophrenia the deceased committed suicide but I am not, at all, convinced with the above stated submission of learned counsel for the petitioner and in my view, the aforesaid defence would be seen at the time of trial. Accordingly, his prayer for bail in connection with Motihari Town P.S. Case No. 92 of 2010, stands rejected. It appears from perusal of prayer portion of this petition that the case of the petitioner is still pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran for commitment but submission on behalf of the petitioner is that the case of this petitioner has already been committed to the court of Sessions. In the aforesaid circumstance, the concerned trial court is directed to conclude the trial of the petitioner within nine months from the date of receipt of this order and if the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within the above stated period, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)