IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 25TH JANUARY 2008 / 5TH MAGHA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 34 of 2008(S) ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.16608/2007 Dated 29/06/2007 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC --------------------------------------------- THRESSIAMMA GEORGE, AGED 61 YEARS, W/O. GEORGE, RESIDING AT KARIMPANAL, CHAITHANYA, KANJIRAPPALLY. BY ADV. SRI.RAMESH CHERIAN JOHN RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENT IN WPC ------------------------------ P.R.VIJAYAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX OFFICER, KANJIRAPPALLY. BY G.P. SRI.K.P.PRADEEP THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. .................................................................... Contempt Case(C) No.34 of 2008 .................................................................... Dated this the 25th day of January, 2008. JUDGMENT Part of the judgment is complied with by revising the assessment in terms of appellate order. Balance is only petitioner's claim for refund of Rs.50,000/- paid in 1991. Government Pleader reported that chalan particulars are not available with the officer or with the Treasury. Since petitioner has made payment to the Tahsildar, Tahsildar is directed to verify his records and give particulars of chalan to the petitioner on production of copy of this judgment. As and when petitioner gets chalan particulars from the Tahsildar, he can approach the officer for refund in terms of the judgment. In view of the above directions, Contempt is closed. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge pms