IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 228 of 2006 (M/B) M/s Roorkee Gasoling Station Landhora Roorkee & others … Petitioners Versus Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. …Respondent Sri V.K. Kohli, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners Sri V.B.S. Negi, learned counsel for the respondent. Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. By means of this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the advertisement dated 23rd December, 2005 published in Hindustan Times for grant of release of petrol outlets situated at Village Landhora, Landhora, Roorkee Road, District Haridwar. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the above advertisement for installing a petrol outlet in Village Landhora, Roorkee Road, District Haridwar, which is reserved for Scheduled Castes along with other outlets. The petitioner is already having a petrol outlet in this village and as per the petitioner his place has been advertised in the said advertisement. The argument advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner is misconceived. In the said advertisement, there is no mention of the outlet of the petitioner. the outlet which is being run by the petitioner has not been advertised for resettlement. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is devoid of merit and is dismissed in-limine. No order as to costs. (B.C. Kandpal, J.) (P.C. Verma, J.) 08.03.2006 R.Dang