hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL SIDE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 629 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 77 OF 2007 Anand Yeshwant Pawar and Ors. ... Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Ms. Seema Chopda with Mr. T.R. Yadav for Petitioner. Mr. P.G. Lad, A.G.P. For Respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 25, 2010 P.C. Petitioners were in the higher pay scale and it appears that the Government found that they were not entitled to the scale and consequently reduced to them to the lower time scale. That was the subject matter of Original Application before the MAT which came to be dismissed. It may also be mentioned that based on reduction in the time scale, the recoveries were sought from the Petitioners. This court has admitted the petition against the order of MAT and has granted interim relief in the matter of recovery. By the present motion, it is pointed out that many of the petitioners retire from time to time and their pension and other retirement benefits are not being released. In the light of that the following order : Motion made absolute in as much as pension will be calculated in terms of the pay scale as upheld by M.A.T. If there be any arrears outstanding against any of the Petitioners, who may superannuate or voluntarily retire, that amount for the present can be withheld from their gratuity amount. This would be subject to the final order in the Petition. Considering the above, motion disposed of. (J.H. BHATIA,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)