IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE NO.16144 OF 2011 1. PAWAN SAO @ PAWAN KUMAR SAH S/O NARSINGH SAO R/O PURANI BAZAR, JAMUI, P.S.-JAMUI, DISTRICT - JAMUI 2. DEEPAK KUMAR S/O LATE SITARAM SINGH R/O TOLA BANGAMA, P.S.- BELHAT, DISTRICT - BANKA VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE BLOCK SUPPLY OFFICER, NAGAR PARISHAD, JAMUI ---------------------------------- 3. 03.11.2011. The instant writ petition is put up under the heading ‘To be mentioned’ as there are certain inadvertent mistakes in order no.2 dated 29.9.2011. There are two petitioners, namely, Pawan Sao @ Pawan Kumar Sah and Deepak Kumar in the writ petition, but only one petitioner has been addressed in order dated 29.9.2011. Let the order be read accordingly. Furthermore, the word ‘petitioner’ referred to in para 3 of the said order be read as ‘petitioner no.1 (Pawan Sao @ Pawan Kumar Sah S/O Narsingh Sao)’. Order dated 29.9.2011 is modified to this extent only. Let the order passed in connection with Jamui Police Station Case No. 270 of 2011 be communicated to the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate/Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jamui through fax at the cost of the petitioners. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)