IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24148 of 2009 SHIV MAHTO @ BANTHA @ SHIV KUMAR @ SHIV KUIMAR MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.8.2009 Heard. The facts have been fully detailed in my earlier rejection order, contained in Annexure-1, as per which the petitioner was not only caught on chase after he had fallen down on the railway track on getting his feet entangled with the tracks but also led the police to recovery of a particular part of booty by dropping some information in that behalf. In that view of the matter, the submission that the petitioner is in custody for about two years or more appears of no consequence. However, the contention that the court has noted down in its order that it was still awaiting the execution report of the processes issued by it has put this Court on alarm. The Court does not exactly know that the case was committed and from which date the court is sitting idle as regards the 2 present case without the appearance being completed. It could expect that the trial Judge who hears Sessions Trial No. 893 of 2008 in Patna(it is probably F.T.C.I, Patna) tightens its belt and go through the pages of the Cr.P.C. to identify his duties and jurisdiction compelling appearance of the accused persons so as to completing the appearance and conclude the trial in a period of two years from the date of receipt/production of a copy of the present order, else, the petitioner may renew his prayer before this Court. The petition is dismissed. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)