^ c i \ QQ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR W.P.No.^3?ti'/2006 Petitioner Respondente ^^. -^M- , ^^y ..:'^'' ^ <l'' ^ef' o-' »?•" , Sunaram Poya, S/o Shri Adhari Ram Poya, Aged about 44 years, R/o Village Horanpuri, PS Selegaon, District Kanker Versus /^\) State of Chhattisgarh - Through the Secretary, School Education Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur 2) The District Education Officer, Distt. Kanker(C.G.) 3) The Collector Kanker, Distt. Kanker 4) The Head Master, Government Middle School, Barbaspur, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) ^-SS^K::^.^' ^SSSjSSs. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CQNSTtTUTlON OF INDIA XI-HC-78 *11*<MI shHl«h T5? '^WW^, ffilfl'H'16, RltKiy ^^ ^^D.^3.^. ^ 200- fc 3T1^?T4;|th (liclFd°"i.ir) 3n^r^TR-<i+ (P(T3n^?Ts»>Ki<0 -r CTdTWHfscra'n^r 18:8.2006:- Shri P.R. Patankar, counsel fl! Shri Sotish &upta, Depirfy respondents, on advance copy. Heard both the counsel. By the instant petition, the order Annexure-P/4 dated 29-7-2( Scheme declaring him as surpius, Schooi, Barbaspur, Btock Bhanuppr Koyabeda. Learned counsef for the pet order it has been shown that the own consent whereas, no such const But, the impugned Rationalization Scheme, 2006 and| an appeal if any teacher- is agg) competent authority, therefore, 4 to the petitjoner. In fhe fir-st i^s; availed of that remedy. In the cir-cumstances, aubmitf-ed that the petitioner appropriate authority under the be directed to decide the same. <tii^id''fl4'<iH<'iTffteI^<R]^i< ^gri^irgn^r pr the petitioner. Govt. Advocate for the Stcrt-e/ petitioner has challenged his tronsfer p06 whereby under the RatJonalization he has been transferred from Middle to Middte Schooi, Mwoda, Block (tioner submiTted that in the impugned tetitioner has been transferred on his ;nt was given by him. ord^r has been passed under the clause-7 of the scheme providei for i^ieved by the order passed by the ^qually efficacious remedy js avatiabie i^stonce, the petitioner ought to have |arned counse! for the petitioner' i|;ants to file an sppeal before the ^cheme and the appropriate authority Hloweyer, since time under Ctause 7 for P.T.O. ^ XI-HC-78 3^ •^MW<<, 'iST^WKo, ^<-\W^. *TTq(fTa><<ra» ^R; 200 3T1^?T14a«h (liFl(d'dl^.i£r) 3n^T$ff?^ra? (WrSTI^Tsbtli'sb Barve ^ 'rt STtTTWflfersn^r "cS: |etitioner has approached this Court' by ff'ime taken by the petitioner from the till its disposal shaii be condoned by fiiing an appea! is 7 days and the t^ filing this writ petition, as such, date of filing of this writ petitic^i the appropriote authority. The writ petition is accordf itself. Consequently, AA.(W.)P.No.^; stand disposed of. Parfies are entitled for ceiftified copy of this order. »i<ifii41-<iiiMTfttei^<Ri«i< ^si^Tan^r ngly, dismissed, Qt the admission stage 379/2006 and I.A.No.7925/2006 also L.C. Bhadoo Judge P.T.O.