-^ c-^- SingSe Bench IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fCHHATTISGARHI W.P.fSlNo. ^||L| /2011 PETITIONERfS) •^ ,<^y .^?y v^-' ^r^y .'^'y ^' / "'<^/ ^-~ ^ ^ ,\" (1) Shiv Gupta, S/o. Shri Sharvan Prasad, aged about 45 years, working as Pump Operator, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur R/o. Gondpara, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) (2) Dilip Yadav, S/o. Late Sadhu Ram Yadav, aged about 40 years, working as Pump Operator, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur R/o. Nutan Colony, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) (3) Dushyant Singh, S/o. Shri Mahesh Singh, aged about 35 years, working as Pump Operator, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur R/o. Gondpara Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Mahesh Soni, S/o. Shri Gopi Soni, aged about 32 years, working as Pump Operator, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur R/o. Gondpara Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) (5) Mahboob Khan, S/o. Shri Amir Khan, aged about 40 years, working as Pump Operator, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur R/o. Gandhi Nagar Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) (6) Ganesh Dewangan, S/o. Shri Baldau Dewangan, aged about 38 years, working as Kuli, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, R/o Katiapara, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) (7) Prem Sonwani, S/o. Late Lallu Sonwani, aged about 40 years, working as Pump Operator, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur R/o. Rajender Nagar, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) (8) Dharmendra Dubey, S/o. Late Ganesh Dubey, aged about 39 years, working as Helper, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur R/o. Gondpara Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) (9) Ajay Soni, S/o. Shri Jainarayan Soni, aged about 36 years, working as Pump Operator, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur R/o. Gondpara Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) ^^ fSf£A^^lel ^;-, '\%.\ RESPONDENTS (10) Laxmi Narayan, S/o. Shri Dayaram Kaushik, aged about 39 years, working as Kuli, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur R/o. Salampur Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS (1) '' State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretaiy, Department of General Administration, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) (2) Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, through its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1^,,^ '' 1 SSSi> 1 V t^J ''^&K£^i B:. ^r ^-S&ass^- ^ ^'^ ..\1 ^I.HC-78 \' z' 3TI^T'9FT'f^thF TT8H 3?T^T 9h^iob ^- '^ 'S^t ^WW^, y>ti1-H<|(o, 1®1<VII<-1^< ..^.:.?;5..:..y..L*.M/.u... h*lich *ll*l^l »»*li<sb"""""""""""""""""7""""""""^200 ^Tf^T TT5RF ( y*^^) ^^R^rf^^n^i SB S MON'Bl.EMR.JUSTICaEPRITINKEROlWAICEIl 29.07.2011 Shri P. S. Koshy, coun; Shri A. V. Sridhar, cou Shri Matin Siddique, o on advarice copy. The limited grlevance they were appointed (n bet^ till date their case for re< considered by the respor circular of the State Governrfnent dated OS.03.2008. Shri Koshi submits th< petltion would ,be served respondent No.2 to considel Sn the light of the circular d^ the light of the judgment matter of State-of Karnataka and others v. Uma Devi (3) and others (20( that number of persons jurt atready been regutarized <sM^t<n<flt1 '^W^f ^f 'fe^t <p3K^K ^3fRW3^T lel for the p^tttloners. isel for r@sponctent No.l. )unsQl for respondent No.2 of the petltioners is that /een the year 1995-97 but lularlzation has not been dent corporation <3esplte |t the purpose offiling this if direction is issued to the case of the p^tittoner ted 05.03.2008 and also jn of the Apex Court in the >6) 4 SCC l. He submite lor to the petttioners h^ve gnonng the case of tte petitioners and the repre^ntation of the petitioners (Annexure P-7) is pending but no order has been passed by respondent No.2. T~ ^""aSs^ 3TI^T 'oFT fq<li<=t» ^w^n^TsCTN? ^-'- *11<1C11 (t»*1ic|» T^r ^i^Kn^, ^nl^^co, [®i<ni^^< r--w---^--y-v*-3-/-'-l-R^200 ^T^CT XT5R? (yiI^^T) WTTW ^Iid 3H^T Learned Counsel fd CDHi<!1<fll *1H<viT'^ !k^\ <Ft^l< ^T 3?fRm W^T r respondent No.2 submits that let the petitioners rfiake fresh representati©nto respondent No.2 who in accordance wlth law. direction to the pet urn shall decide the same In Accordingly the pe^ition ts disposed of with a frloners to ftle a fresh representation before r^spondent No.2 withln two weeks from today and 1 would be decided by i that eventuality the same the concerned authorlty in accordance wlth law wit(itn a further period of four months. It is made clear that this court has not expre^ed any opinion on the merlts| of the case and the Municipal Corporation would be | at liberty to declde the representation strictly In ^ccordance with law after due scrutiny of the facts. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge ^rm^i ^^gsm^T, H5Rt^fTaT—^s/i40—2/201 i—i ,50,000,