IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION (S/S) No. 73 of 2007 M.S. Rana ………….Petitioner Versus Wildlife Institute of India and another …...Respondents. Present : Mr. M.C. Pant, Advocate holding brief of Mr. R.K. Raizada, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Anjali Bhargava, Standing Counsel for the Union of India. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) Heard Mr. M.C. Pant, Advocate holding brief of Mr. R.K. Raizada, Advocate for the petitioner and Ms. Anjali Bhargava, Standing Counsel for the Union of India. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner Mr. M.C. Pant and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Union of India Ms. Anjali Bhargava have made a statement at the bar that this matter is covered by the judgment of this Court dated 26.7.2011 passed in Writ Petition (S/S) No. 72 of 2007 (Pradeep Kumar Agarwal Vs. Wildlife Institute of India and another), whereby the writ petition of the petitioner has been allowed and it is prayed that this writ petition may also be allowed on the same terms and conditions as in order dated 26.7.2011 passed by this Court, in the other writ petition. Based on the aforesaid statement made by learned counsels for both the parties, writ petition is allowed in the same terms and conditions of order dated 26.7.2011 passed by this Court in Writ Petition (S/S) No. 72 of 2007 (Pradeep Kumar Agarwal Vs. Wildlife Institute of India and another). No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 8.8.2011 Avneet