IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 22ND JUNE 2009 / 1ST ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 17145 of 2009(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. T.P.SOBI, THANIMALAYIL HOUSE, PULACODE P.O., THRISSUR. 2. JOBY.M.JOY, MUTHUPATHIKAYIL HOUSE, ANTHIMAHAKALAMKAVU, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR. BY SRI P.N. SANTHOSH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P. (C) No.17145 OF 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 22nd day of June 2009 J U D G M E N T The 1st petitioner hold a regular permit to operate a stage carriage on the route Thottekode-Thrissur-Ayyanthole. The vehicle along with the permit was transferred in favour of the second petitioner. But the transfer has not been endorsed on the permit. Hence this writ petition. 2. I heard the learned Government Pleader also. If the delay in the endorsement of transfer is only on account of a non production of the current records of the vehicle which belonged to the first petitioner, then such delay cannot be justified. This issue has been considered in Ext.P5 judgment. 3. In the result, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to proceed further with Ext. P2 and endorse the factum of transfer in the permit within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The same shall be issued to the second petitioner after production of the current records of the vehicle produced by the second petitioner. (V.GIRI, JUDGE) jma