Vijay Singh Age 62 years: S/o ate Dr. Laxman Singh /o Nar Saint Fmncis School, Ameri Road, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretaxy, Governmen of Chhattisgarh, Water Resource epartment DKS Bhawan: Mantralaya, Raiyur, Chhattisgarh 2. Chief Engineer, ater Resources Depamnent, Hasdeo Basin, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. Engineering Administrative Offer Office of the Chief Engineer, Water Resoures Dartment Hasdeo Basin: Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Shr K.G.Gupta the then Chief Eneer, Water Resources Deartment, _ Hasde Basin, Chhattisgarh. Shri A.K.Swarnkar, The then Engineerin Administrative Oiiicer, iiice ofthe Chf Engiee, Presently ncharge Superinnding Enginee Water Resorces partment, Hasdeo Basin Bilaspur Chhattisarh. 6. Accountant General, Chhattiarh, Raiur hhattisgh sg p Car WRIT PETITION UNDER. ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Biiaspur, Present: Shri R.S.Marhas Advocate for the petitioner Shri Arun Sao, Ghvemment Advocate for the. State/respondems 1 to 3 ORAL ORDER (Passed on 11:5 day of September, 2008) With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. This matter pertains to payment ofretiral benefits 2. This Court, in the matter of W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed question offacts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 5055 of 2008 d L R e t s D, . PETITIONER RESPONDENTS W ic, c ep, i $ gin p o g O ie nr I te r, u De , , g in WP. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Government and others) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh & Others Vs. Baijnath Mandal and anofhor). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31“ of January, 2Q08 passed in W3. No. 4642-12904 Baijnath Manda} (supra) as submitted by learned counsel appearing for the parties. With the consent of the parties, this petition is accordingly disposed of in the same tenns i.e. the office ofthe Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days hem the date of receipt of a copy of the petition from the petitioner and this order. Thereader, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and the odicers concerned, within a iiirther period of 15 days. The Committee shalt consider and pass order, in accordance with law, atter affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may tile additional documents, ifnecessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner be completed within a period of four months trom the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order. The petitioner shall supply extracopy of the petition to Shri Arun Sac, Government Advocate for the State/respondent No. l to 3 for forwarding the same to the Committee. In case of gievance with regard to non-payment of pensionery dues, it is not necessary to file a writ petition before this Court directly. The representation/application can be moved before the Pension Committee as stated above. The Pension Committee shall not reiiise to entertain the representation/application, if so filed directly. , i5 .