IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO. 832 OF 2006 NO. 832 OF 2006 NO. 832 OF 2006 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 1228 OF 2005 NO. 1228 OF 2005 NO. 1228 OF 2005 Meena Nitin Mehta ] .. Appellant (Ori.Defendant) Versus Padmavati Manordas Mehta ] .. Respondent (Ori.Plaintiff) Mr. R.V. Govilkar with Ms. J.A. Sarkhot for the appellant. CORAM: R.M. LODHA, & S.A. BOBDE, JJ. DATED: 23RD NOVEMBER, 2006 P.C. : . The impugned judgment records that the Suit is decreed by consent of the parties. Mr. R.V. Govilkar, the counsel for the appellant submits that this is factually incorrect. If that be so, the course open to the appellant is to bring this fact to the notice of the learned Judge who passed the decree on 13th October, 2006. 2. Confronted with this, the counsel for the appellant prays for withdrawal of this Appeal with liberty to the appellant to apply to the learned trial : 2 : Judge for redressal of her grievance. 3. Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed. Sd/- [R.M. [R.M. [R.M. LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] Sd/- [S.A. [S.A. [S.A. BOBDE, J.] BOBDE, J.] BOBDE, J.]