IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.563 of 2009 MD.MURTUZA HUSSAIN SON OF SHAMSUL HAQUE, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BAKSAMA, P.S. GORAUL, DISTRICT- VAISHALI.... PETITIONER/APPELLANT. Versus 1 THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD, PATNATHROUGH I TS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD, PATNA. 4. THE REVENUE OFFICE, BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD, PATNA. 5. THE BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD, MUZAFFARPUR, DIVISION, MUZAFFARPUR 6. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD, MUZAFFARPUR 7. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD, MUZAFFARPUR, SUB-DIVISION, MUZAFFARPUR...RESPONDENTS ----------- 5 6-10-2009 Heard the parties. The writ court found that admitted dues payable to the writ petitioner/ appellant was Rs.31,579/- which after deduction of Income Tax came to Rs. 31,296/-. As per direction of the writ court, the cheque for that amount was revalidated and has already been paid to the appellant. Since there was delay of about 24 years from the date when the payment became due till the validated cheque was given to the appellant, after clarification of the order of the writ court in review, instead of Rs.1408 as amount of interest at the rate of 6% allowed by the writ court, the appellant was ultimately paid by way of interest an amount of Rs.44,597/-. This amount was calculated at the rate of 6% per annum simple interest from the time payment became due ( June 1984) to the date of cheque ( March 2008) - 2 - On behalf of appellant it has been submitted that his grievance is that full and final payment has not been made after preparation of final bill and order should be passed for that to be done by the respondent and the amount found due should be paid to him with compound interest at the rate of 15% from the due date till the date of final payment. The appeal is directed only against the order dated 15-4- 2009 passed in Civil Review No. 7 of 2009. On careful reading of that order, we find that necessary correction has been made in the order passed in the writ case to the advantage of the appellant and no issue of fact or law arises for decision in this appeal. In that view of the matter, we find no merit in this appeal. It is, accordingly, dismissed. ( Shiva Kirti Singh,ACJ) ( Shyam Kishore Sharma,J) , Naresh