IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 26TH JUNE 2008 / 5TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 15602 of 2008(G) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ---------------------- E.K.PRADEEP, ELAYINKAL HOUSE, POLPAKKARA P.O., EDAPPAL. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT: ---------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. K.V. MANOJKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.15602/2008 G APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DTD. 7/08/2007. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.466/08 DTD. 12/02/2008. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE NOTICE FOR TIMING CONFERENCE DTD. 7/04/2008. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE FINANCIER. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.32557/2006 DTD. 15/12/2006. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 15602 OF 2008 G = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 26th June 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner complains of the delay in settlement of his timings. According to the petitioner, by Ext. P2 judgment in W.P.(C) No. 466/08, there is already a direction to settle the timing within the time frame indicated therein. It is stated that the timing has not been settled as directed and therefore the petitioner himself has suggested a clash free timing which should be directed to be considered by the respondent. 2. I am not in agreement with the counsel. By Ext. P2 judgment the timing of the petitioner has already been directed to be settled. If that judgment has not been complied with it is for the petitioner to prosecute the matter in the appropriate manner and a a second writ petition for the same relief is not the proper remedy. Writ petition fails and is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-