IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 989 of 2008 (M/S) Sushil Kumar Garg & others. .……… Petitioners Versus Smt. Shakuntala Devi. .……… Respondent Mr. Sharad Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. Vide the impugned order dated 4th March, 2008, while issuing notice to the respondent in the Temporary Injunction Application and declining to grant ad-interim ex-parte injunction, the learned trial court had fixed 19th March, 2008 as the next date in the case. Thereafter, apparently the matter was adjourned on a few occasions without the respondent being served the notice in the Temporary Injunction Application matter. Without admitting this petition to hearing, I dispose it of at the motion hearing stage, also without issuing any notice to the respondent, by passing the following order: Within three days from the date of communication of this order, the learned trial court shall ensure that effective steps are taken for service of notice in the Temporary Injunction Application matter upon the respondent. Actually, a special Process Server shall be deputed for this purpose with explicit directions to him to ensure that all steps are taken by him for effecting service upon the respondent. A very short date shall be fixed in the notice which shall be made returnable before that date. Once the respondent appears, the Temporary Injunction Application shall be disposed of within four weeks from the date of her appearance. (V.K. Gupta, C. J.) 17.06.2008 G