HiGKCOURT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (Q} No. 1937 of 2008 Peti^oners 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Versus Respondents 1. 2. 3. 4. Beni Prasad Tiwari, S/o Shri Ram Adhar Tiwari. ^ge about 59 years, fassVi. T^cher, Govt. Middte School, Rudn. Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) Smt. Saria John (Mashih), W/o Shri Kalyan Mashih. Age about 54 years. Asstt. Teachw, Govl. Middle School, jaiampur, Distt. - Dhamtari (C.G.) Kanwal Singh Tarak, S/o Late Shri Ledgu Ram Tarak, Age about 56 yeare, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Micklte Schoot. Gangrel, Distt. - Dhamtari (C.G.) Smt Sudhamati Sahu, W/o Shri Radhe Lal Sahu. Age about 57 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Potiyadih. Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) Purushottam Singh Sahu, S/o Shri Puranik Ram Sahu, Age about 57 years. Asstt. Teacher. Govt. Primary School, Katartarai, Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) Radheshyam Sahu, S/o Late Shri Htrde Ram Sahu. Age about 57 years. Asstt. Teacher, Govt, Primary School, Mujgahan, Distt. - Dhamtari (C.G.) Raj Kumar Dewangan, S/o Shri Sukhru Ram Dewangan, Age about 58 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Piparchhedi. Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) Noor Singh Sahu, S/o Late Shri Jagat Ram Sahu, ^e about 58 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Midle School, Sambaipur. Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) Chetan LaS Sahu, S/o Shri Dayatu Ram Sahu. Age about 51 years. Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary SchooS, Semra (BhaRhara) Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) State Govt. of ChhatGsgarh, Through: Secretery, Education & Tribal Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur. (C.G.) Distrlct Education Offlcer, Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) Block Education Officor, Kuru<^Dhamteri (C.G.) Treasury, Accourrt & Pension, Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) WRIT PETITOIN UNDER ART1CLE 226 OF THE CONSTSTUTIQN QF !NDSA Single Bench : Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate tor the petitioner. Smt Smitha Ghai. Panel Lawyer for the respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on this 1st day of April, 2008) The petitioners were appointed initjally, on a fixed pay of Rs. 100/-. The petitjoners were thereafter, granted regular pay scale on comptetion of the probation period. The quesfion of law involved herein is, asto whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scate w.e.f. the date of initial appolntment or from the date ofcomptetion ofprobation period. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. as well as (eamed counsel appearing for the respondents/State. jojntfy submit that the facte and question of law, involved in the present writ petition, are the same asto that of jn W. P. (S) No. 3568/2007 (Loknath Patel Vs. State of Chhattjsgarh & others). which was allowect vide order dated 27.6.2007. In view of ttie above-stated submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in the same terms i.e. petftioners are entitled for regular pay scate w.e.f. the date of jnitial appointment, subjectto verifiGatJon ofthe facts. No order asto costs. Thakur Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge