IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.6442 of 2010 NARENDRA RAI @ JYOTI RAI, S/O LATE GHANSHYAM RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR **** /2/ 18.02.2010 Heard both the sides. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Taking into consideration the fact that it was a case of bank dacoity and the fact that the petitioner had criminal antecedent of similar nature of offence and I had recently refused bail as on 11.11.2009 since I had already considered the merit of the case, I am not inclined to review my earlier order. 4. The prayer for bail is rejected. 5. The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial so as to conclude it within a reasonable period. S.A. (Anjana Prakash, J.)