IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1764 of 2009 BINOD MAHATO & ORS . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 03 19/03/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Upon perusal of the impugned order dated 1.12.2008 passed in Criminal Revision No. 112 of 2006 by the Additional District & Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-II, Motihari, more particularly paragraph-5 of the same, this Court is satisfied that the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, was convinced of procedural irregularities committed by the Court of the S.D.J.M. in passing of the impugned order dated 7.3.2006 for reasons discussed by him in detail at papragraph-5 of the order. He has, therefore, set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the original Court for passing fresh orders in accordance with law. There is no occasion for this Court to interfere with the impugned order at this stage. Any fresh orders passed by the learned S.D.J.M. shall always be amenable to challenge by the aggrieved before the appropriate Court in accordance with law. The application stands dismissed. P.K. ( Navin Sinha, J.)