WP(C) 4646/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. R. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mrs. Bora, learned Central Govt. counsel appearing for the respondents. The petitioner by the present petition has challenged the action on the part of the respondent authorities in declaring him medically unfit for recruitm ent as Constable (General Duty) in CRPF. According to the petitioner, though he was selected, subject to the medi cal fitness, for recruitment as Constable (General Duty), he was initially decla red as medically unfit by the Medical Board and thereafter by the Review Medical Board, which was constituted on his own request, despite the fact that he is me dically fit. It is also the contention of the petitioner that such Review Medica l Board declared the petitioner unfit without any opinion from the eye specialis t. The records produced by the learned Central Govt. counsel reveal that th e Review Medical Board, constituted at the instance of the petitioner, also decl ared the petitioner as medically unfit because of defective distant vision . It also appears from the record that the opinion of the eye specialist was also ob tained, who also opined about the defect of the distant vision of the petitioner . Since the petitioner’s case has been examined by the Review Medical Boar d consisting of the eye specialist, such medical opinion cannot be interfered wi th by this Court and declare the petitioner medically fit for recruitment as Con stable (General Duty). That being the position, I do not find any merit to grant the relief as prayed for in the present writ petition. Hence the writ petition is accordingly dismissed.