IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13215 of 2010 1. RAMJEE PANDIT, SON OF LATE CHANDRADEO PANDIT 2. PRAYAG SAO, SON OF LATE RAM BABU SAO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 28/04/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 328, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that for misuse of privilege of bail for a period of six years and nine years respectively, the petitioners have remained in custody since 16.2.2010, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J., F.T.C. IIIrd, Patna, in Sessions Trial No. 968 of 1999 arising out of G.R.P. P.S. Case No. 97 of 1999 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioners. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail - 2 - on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. The trial court is directed to positively conclude the trial within nine months in view of the fact that the occurrence is of the year 1999 and accused persons are present during trial. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)