IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7855 of 2011 SURAJDEO PRASAD @ PAPPU Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 01.04.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged against Md. Mahmood Alam, Ranbir Kumar and Vijay Kumar to have conducted the examination for recruitment in Railway after collecting money Rs. 5,000/- each from thirty five candidates. Subsequently no recruitment was done. It is alleged against the petitioner that his wife Shobha Devi was the controller of the said examination and the petitioner and one Hira Lal Singh were the leaders of the said organisations. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the teacher in the Government School and on the alleged date of examination i.e., 05.08.2008 he was present 2 in school. Considering the fact that the main thrust of the accusation is against thee aforesaid three persons, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Phulwarisharif P.S. Case No. 367 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C. J. M. Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)