1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO.634 OF 2010. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS. DARVESH KISAN RANGARI AND OTHERS ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri T. A. Mirza, APP for State appellant. CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 22nd DECEMBER 2010. 1. This is an appeal against acquittal. 2. Heard Learned APP. 3. Learned APP's main grievance is that the conviction, which is ordered under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code, was liable to be ordered under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code considering the nature of the injury and use of weapon. 4. Perused the judgment. 5. As we find that it would not make much difference in the sentence to be awarded even if the respondents are convicted under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code on the facts of the case. 2 6. We, therefore, consider it a matter of formality to entertain the appeal when on the point of sentence no much change is likely in the sentence. 7. We, therefore, dismiss the appeal. Judge Judge //mule//