IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 18336 of 1999 Between: K.T.Vijay Sekhar, S/o. V.Subbaiah, Gudur, Nellore District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Divisional Co-opertive Officer, Co-operative Urban Bank, Gudur, Nellore District. 2 The Commissioner For Co-operation and Registrar, Of Co-operative Societies, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh. 3 The Joint Registrar & District Co-operative Officer, Nellore. 4 The Government of Andhra Prasad, Rep. by its SecretFood & Agriculture Co-operation Department Secretariat, Hyderabad. ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus in declaring the action of the 1st Respondent in removing the petitioner as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India violative of Principles of natural justice, and accordingly set aside the orders Liq.G.C.U.B/1/99, dated 4-1-99, and consequentially direct the respondents to continue the petitioner or in the alternative to absorb in any Co-operative Institutions duly taking into consideration the G.O.Ms.No. 448, dt. 6-10-94, and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.R.SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No. 18336 of 1999 Order: This writ petition was listed for hearing on 20th January 2009. When the matter was called, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 20th January 2009, it is posted today under the caption “for dismissal”. Although the matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal”, even today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. _____________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J. Date: 22.01.2009 Nsr