IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 7329 of 2008. Decided on 9th December, 2010. Brij Lal. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : None. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner was engaged as Chainman w.e.f. 15.11.1996 on part time basis for four hours daily. By medium of this petition, he is seeking regularization. Case of the respondent- State is that he could not be considered for regularization, since he had been appointed only to work on part time basis. The State Government had already issued a notification, whereby Part Time Workers, who had worked for more than ten years, have to be given the status of daily wager. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to confer upon the petitioner the status of daily wager, in view of the policy framed by the respondent-State, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 09, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - - 3 -