IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 1ST SEPTEMBER 2008 / 10TH BHADRA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2922 of 2008() ------------------------------ SC.316/2006 of ADDL.SESSIONS COURT, THODUPUZHA .................... REVN. PETITIONER: ------------------ JIBUMON, AGED 33 YEARS, S/O CHADRASEKHARAN NAIR, PARATHANATH, PARAPPUZHA P.O., THODUPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJEEV RESPONDENTS: ------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM (CRIME NO.17 OF 2005 OF KARIMKUNNAM POLICE STATION), BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR C.M.NAZAR THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Crl.R.P. No. 2922 of 2008 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 01-09-2008 ORDER The revision petitioner challenges the order dated 11-08-2008 passed by the II Addl. Sessions Judge, Thodupuzha arraigning him as the 9th accused in S.C. 316 of 2006 . It was since the complicity of the petitioner in the occurrence was made out in the evidence before the Sessions Court that the petitioner was arrayed as A9 by invoking the power under Sec. 319 Cr.P.C. No doubt, the apprehension of the petitioner that the court below has virtually found him guilty can be allayed by holding that the findings and observations in the impugned order shall not influence the court below while disposing of S.C. No. 316 of 2006 and that the disposal of the said Sessions Case shall be strictly in accordance with the evidence adduced before Court. I do so. Clarifying the above this Crl.M.C. is dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) ani.