Crl. Misc. No.M-4896 of 2009 ::1:: IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-4896 of 2009 Date of decision: 15.09.2010 Satish .. Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another. .. Respondents Present:- None for the petitioner. Ms. Priyanka Dalal, AA.G, Haryana, for respondent No.1-State. Mr.J.S.Hooda, Advocate, for respondent No.2. * * * * 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) Perusal of the file reveals that no one had appeared on behalf of the petitioner on 06.04.2010. The position remained the same on 13.07.2010. Today also, no one has come present on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 states that the present petitioner had also filed Criminal Writ Petition No.1406 of 2009 alleging that the prosecutrix was in illegal custody of her parents. In pursuance of the same, the prosecutrix appeared in the Court and made a statement that the petitioner had taken her against her will. Accordingly, the prosecutrix was allowed to go with her parents and the said writ petition was accordingly dismissed. Crl. Misc. No.M-4896 of 2009 ::2:: In the present petition, the petitioner is seeking quashing of FIR No. 98 dated 04.03.2008 under Sections 363/366 of Indian Penal Code, registered against him at Police Station Palwal, District Faridabad. The prosecutrix is stated to be a minor at the time of occurrence. Thus, taking into account the age as well as her statement in the Criminal Writ Petition No.1406 of 2009, the present petition is dismissed being devoid of merits. September 15, 2010 (NIRMALJIT KAUR) sukhpreet JUDGE