Criminal Misc.-M No. 19123 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 19123 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.11.2011 Minakshi Sharma and another .. Petitioners Vs. The State of Punjab .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. G. S. Sandhu, Advocate for petitioner No. 1. Mr. B. B. S. Teji, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Naveen Sharma, Advocate for the complainant. ... Rajesh Bindal J. The present petition qua petitioner No. 2 was dismissed vide order dated 11.7.2011. Learned counsel for petitioner No. 1 submitted that the matter in dispute between the parties has been compromised. The amount, which was invested by the complainant through petitioner No. 1, has been returned back to the complainant. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Baljit Singh, while not disputing the fact that a compromise deed has been handed over to the Investigating Officer by the parties, submitted that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. Considering the aforesaid stand of learned counsel for the State, the petitioner is directed to appear before Investigating Officer on 22.11.2011 at 10.00 AM for joining investigation. In case of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction Criminal Misc.-M No. 19123 of 2011 [2] of the Arresting/Investigating Officer. She shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called upon for further investigation. She shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 14.11.2011 mk