c^ "^2 -^^•^^ti, IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION (S) N0.3 3^^/2010 PETITIONER L^~ ^fc''.^v^?%°- ^0'?^ ^.^>- ^ ^.^ :..^~^^y ^^••-' RESPONDENTS: ^ Tika Ram Jangade S/o Haricharan Jangade, aged about 56 Years Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle school Amandula, Block - Malkharoda, Distt. Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) VERSUS ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) /^2. The District Education Officer, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) ^ 3. Block Education officer Block- Malkharoda, Distt. Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^^' ^\\ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Sinate Bench: Hon'bte Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava. J. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION (Sl N0.3344^2010 Tika Ram Jangade Versus State of Chhattisgarh and others OFINDIA Present: - Shri Asltwani Shukla. counsel for the petitionen. Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORALORDER (Passed on 09th Juty, 2010) The petitioner was initiaUy appointed as E)eputy Teacher on a fixed pay of Rs.100/-. After completion of their probation period, he was granted regu\ar pay scaleofRs.169-300/-. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the issue involved in ttie case is as to whettier the petitioner is entttled to regular pay s<»te with effect from the ctate of initial appointment or after comptetion of probation period. 3. The issue involved herein was considered by the Madhya Practesh State Administratjve Tribunal, Jabalpur in OA.No.2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu an<f 56 Offiers v. State ofM.P. & others), wherein it was held that the similarly sjtuated teachers are entitled to regutar pay scate with effect from the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal fa> the effect that the Teachere/Assfetant Teachers are entitted to regular pay scate from the date of jnitial appointment. vv^^ !^^^" ^^ ^ Tumane 4. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner further submtts that this Court. while considering fhe same issue in AmarSaiRam & Others v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others, W.P.(S).No.4725/2006. by order dated 01-09-2006. allowed the petitioners to make a representation within a period <^ ten days. raising all the grievances. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is granted Hberty to make a representation raising all grievances in light of the aforestated judgment and the circular dated 13-01-2009 (Annexure P-2) and in turn. the concemed respondent is directed to decide the representation. if any. in accordance with law. on its own merits, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, subject to verification of the facts. 6. In view of the foregoing, this petition is dfeposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge