1 RA 175.08 in S.A. 813.06 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 175 OF 2008 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 813 OF 2006 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. S.S.Choudhari,Advocate for the applicant Mr. M.S.Swami, Advocate for the respondent ................... CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 08/12/2010 PER COURT : 1. Heard Mr. S.S. Choudhari, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. M.S.Swami, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. Vide the present application, the applicant seeks review of the Judgment and Order dated 8/9/2008 passed by this Court dismissing the Second Appeal. 3. Mr. Choudhari, learned counsel for the applicant states that the sale deed which is relied upon though the document is of 30 years 2 RA 175.08 in S.A. 813.06 old, the presumption is not to the contents. The contents were not proved, so also, the area of G.No. 20 has not been mentioned in the sale deed. As such it could not have been said that the non applicants have proved their case. 4. The jurisdiction of this Court while exercising powers under review under section 114 read with Order XLVII of the Code of Civil Procedure is in a narrow compass. This Court while entertaining the review can not sit as an appellate authority. This Court while dismissing the Second Appeal vide its Order dated 8/9/2008 had considered the sale deed and also the measurement conducted through T.I.L.R. and have arrived at the plausible conclusion. No error apparent on the face of record. As such, the review application is rejected. [ S.V.GANGAPURWALA ] JUDGE knp/RA 175.08 in SA 813.06