AB 1490/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B D AGARWAL By this application U/S 438 CrPC, the accused person, namely, Md Mujibur Rahman, is seeking pre-arrest bail, apprehending his arrest in connecti on with Hojai PS Case No. 3 of 2011 under Sections 379/427/34 of the Indian Pena l Code. Heard Sri S K Singha, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also h eard Sri K Munir, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. I have also perused the Case Diary. The prosecution case is that the accused was found possessing a stolen truck. Not only that, after purchasing a ten-wheeler truck, the accused c hanged the body of the truck by way of making it a six-wheeler truck. Sri S K Singha, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted tha t the petitioner had purchased the truck from one Bishnu Dhar. This Court had th e occasion to consider few other bail applications earlier, wherein, Bishnu Dhar of Maligaon/Pandu was involved in selling stolen vehicles. Be that as it may, the petitioner has not furnished the payment details or any affidavit from the vendor. At the same time, the conduct of the p etitioner in changing the body of the truck immediately after purchase smacks of his foul play. Hence, it is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to th e accused. The interim bail granted to the petitioner on 22.07.2011, is her eby vacated. The Anticipatory Bail Application accordingly, stands rejected.