t ^I^^^J BFyr'9 o ^... ^ ^^ ^?? •^)^^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G) W.P. (C) N0. &5d^ OF 2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^4 ,>%^): ,^^ \^"" :/ Dr. A.K.B. Rahman, aged about 50 years, S/o Late Hafizur Rahman, R/o Quarter No. C/3, Officers Colony, P.O.-Churcha Colliery, District-Korea (C.G.) VERSUS ^:1. The Secretary, Central Board of Secondary Education Shiksha Kendra 2, Community Centre Preet Vihar, DELHI. /2. The Regionat Officer, Central Board of Secondary Education Regional Office, Todarmai Marg, AJMER (Rajasthan) ^3. The Principal, Kendriyg Vidhyalaya, Baikunthpur, P.O.-Baikunthpur, District-Korea (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA ^^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRJT PETiTIQNCC) No. 6918 of2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Di'. A.K.B.Rahman. VER8U8 The Secretaiy, Central Board of Secondaiy EducatiorA & Others. WPJT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUnON OF INDIA S_B:JIoji»MeS!m_SatishK._As!uhotnjr, Prescnt: Sbi'i B.Narayan Rao, Advocate for the petitioner. Sliri P.RPataiikar, Advocate for the respoiidesits 1 and 2. QRDER(ORAL) (Passed on 27fe day of' September, 2010) Leamed counsel appearmg for the respondent No, 1 aiid 2 submits that ifa fresh application is made is made for veritlcation ofthe mai'ks alongvvith the required fee, the same shall be considered as early as possible, preferably withiii a period offour weeks from the date of receipt of the application, in accordance with the roquirement. In view ofthe above, according to leamed counsel appearmg for the petitioner submits that nothing sui'vives for adjudication in this 3. petitson. Accordmgly, the writ petrtion is disposed of Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit