H'^ ,?^.61- BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR M.A. N0. \ ^/2009 APPELLANT PLAINTIFF Sil 9 Jitendra Kumar Sahu, S/o. Shri Khemu Ram Sahu.aged about35 years, R/o. L1G-173, Tilak Nagar, Gudiyari, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS DEFENDANTS ,....^^:::^ [^^-r :1 . Rasmani Mishra, S/o. Ramanandan V- Mishra, aged about 35 years, R/o, Ekta Nagar, Raipur, Gudiyari Raipur, District Raipur(C.G.) 2. Ram Pratap Singh, S/o. Late Jainarayan Singh, R/o. Ashok Nagar, Gudiyari, Raipur (C.G.) MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL U/0.43 RULE 1 (rtOF THECODE OF C ^r ^ . GRIMINAL PROCEDURE Cv^- '^ST r<ii^i^t<4, yiTii'y4i(o, [®Kni<-i^< *<1*1CTI »*<icit "^200^ ^n^??T 9w3K (^rf^5^) W^T^T^N? 'c?£IT^n^TsFRT^' (--•"'' l-.-<' Sahu 'R<TTW^ft?f 3?T^?T S.B, Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K, ^ 19.04.2010 Shri AK Prasad, Advocate Shri P13 ,$ahu, Advocateforl None^fOrrespondent No. 2.| Learned cbunsel appearin^ this appeal may be dlsposed of (] the suit within the stipulatedtime Prayer is reasonable and isj Accordingly, the appeal is <| directed to decide the suit in a<| merits as early as possible prefej from the date of receipt of a co| costs. cnHt<!i<i1^ ^m^ ^ 'fex3t <Fait^i< '^3tRP:T 3TT^?T -aarwal 'or appellant. respondent No. 1. for the appellant submits that |irecting the trial court to decide ^eriod. allowed. lisposed of and the trial court is ;cordance with law on its own •ably within a period six months py of this order. No order asto Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge ^w^ ^i^f ^iT^yr, ?^:<"itcr —FS/I47—2/2010—i ,00,000.