IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.9391 of 2011 Date of Decision : May 25, 2011. Amanpreet Singh .....Petitioner versus The State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.R.K.Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by the cut off date as 1.1.2011 for the purpose of minimum and maximum age limit, as contained in the advertisement dated 7.5.2011 (Annexure P-1). Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the considered view that the fixation of cut off date is essentially a policy matter and in case there is any ambiguity in fixation thereof, the appropriate recourse for the petitioner would be to approach the Competent Authority. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to submit a self-explanatory representation for change/ modification in the cut off date regarding the upper and minimum age limit. CWP No.9391 of 2011 [2] If any such representation is made by the petitioner, the respondents are directed to consider and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order within a period of two weeks of its receipt. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. May 25, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE