IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10377 of 2010 RAGHU KUMAR PANDEY, SON OF LATE SHRI GAJADHAR PANDEY, R/O ASHARFI VILLA, H/O ASHARFI YADAV, P.S. BUDHA COLONY, DISTT. PATNA………….. PETITIONER Versus STATE OF BIHAR…………………………….. OPP.PARTY ----------- 2 20-4-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has prayed for anticipatory bail in a case under sections 379,411 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that police has not been able to gather any evidence to connect the petitioner with the offence except alleged confession of two co-accused who on arrest named the petitioner as a co-accused involved in various offences involving loot of Motor-cycle. The order of the Sessions Court shows that two of the co-accused namely Sunil Kumar and Amit Kumar Tiwary @ Tunnu disclosed the name of the petitioner as person involved in the occurrence and on their statements and the disclosure the police recovered motorcycles which were looted from different persons. Considering the professional nature of the crime it is not deemed to be an appropriate case for grant of anticipatory bail. The prayer is therefore, rejected. This order shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner if he surrenders and seeks regular bail. Naresh ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)