éj (Sinaie Eench: Hon'bie. Mr. Jusi'ice Dhirendm Mishra) (Pefifion U/A 22:6 of Consfifu‘rion of India) PETITIONER 5.K. Rai, 5/0 lafe Shri Ramadhar Rai, aged abou? 68 year's, R/o. éodhanpur, Fundudihur'i Mmbikapur), Disf‘r. Surguja (C.6.) Vs EESPONDENTS 1. Sfa'l-e of Chha‘i‘fisgarh, Through: Seer-awry, Deparmenf of School Educa‘l'ion, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 11‘ I ne .‘ KL. UlréCTar‘, .I. - .. uepw‘fmém N _ _ A. 6T .C a€ri6él E I I Educafion, Raigarh (C.G.) 3 The Dis‘f‘r‘ic‘f Ea'ucai'ion Officér', Educai‘io'r'I, Disff. Jashpur (C.G.) ?resenf: Mr. Sanjay Pa‘l'eL Advocaw for ‘rh pefifioner. Mr. M.P.5. Bha‘fia, Depufy 6ov1'. A oca‘re for fhe Sm‘re. 13.1w By fhis pe‘rifion The pe‘r 1'ioner' has prayed for a direction To fhe respondeni’s To consider- case f The peTiTioner and provide benefiT of Section 22 (D) of The C.6. Fun amenTaI Rules for granT of incremenTs, as provided under The ruies, and iso To pay arrears from The daTe when iT became due. Learned counsei fo'r The eTiTioner submiTs ThaT The peTiTioner was appoinTed To The posT of Assis nT DisTricT School'InspecTor, however, he was posTed as LecTurer Th reafTer. As per Rule 22 (D) of The IN) > Wm mmqaiawu) M200 warm-«m Wm1¥wm %a‘aimsné¥r @v Wm 1:1 zoo mm (Wu) WWW WW f‘w’IW sla- évaffaum Fundamen‘ral Rules The pefi‘l'ioner- is en'fi‘l'led for pay fixaTion a‘r fhe s'rage of nex'r above The pay nofionally a ~rived aT by increasing his pay in respecf of 1'he lower ‘posf by one incremim‘r a1- Tha‘r sfage. He fur‘fher submifs Thai This ma1'1'er has been finaliy decided by 1'his Cour‘r vide order dafed 27.3.2008 passed in WP. (s) No.4 991/06 and The case of 1'he pe'rifioner is squarely covered by The aforesai order. Mr. Bha‘l’ia, iearned Depufy overnmenf Advoca‘i’e appearing for fhe $1'a're does no‘r dispu‘re fha‘r The c se of The peTiTioner is squarely covered ’ by fhe aforesaid order of Annéx re P-9. He furfher submi‘l's Thaf if ‘l'he peTiTioner files fresh represenTa ion before The concerned auThoriTy for The reliefs which he has claimed way of This peTiTion, The same shall be decided in accordance wiTh law su jecT To verificaTion of The facTs sTaTed in The peTiTion. ‘In view of The above submi sions, The insTanT peTiTion is disposed of wiTh liberTy To The ‘peTiTioner make fresh represenTaTion before respondenT No.2 raising all his ievances raised in This peTiTion and on such represenTaTion being made, respondenT No2 shall decide The same in accordance wiTh law on iTs own mefiT wiThin a period of Three monThs from fhe daTe of receipf of *he represenfafion. Wi Cel‘lll fed CODV r as Del' r lUles. Ii Sdl‘ I rendra M‘Shra l , Judge d o g