1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO.951 OF APPEAL NO.951 OF APPEAL NO.951 OF 1990 1990 1990 Ishwarlal Chelabhai Choksey & Ors. ...Appellants Vs. Suryakant Maganlal Patel & Ors. ...Respondents CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: AUGUST 11, 2004. AUGUST 11, 2004. AUGUST 11, 2004. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Office noting shows that the Appellants have not paid deficit court fee of Rs.2060/- though the First Appeal has been disposed of. Office noting shows that notice is already served on the Appellants calling upon the Appellants to make payment of court fee and the notice has been followed by two reminders. In spite of service of notice and reminders, the payment of deficit court fee is not made by the Appellants. 2. In the circumstances, Office is directed to submit a report whether the Advocate for Appellants had given any undertaking to pay Court fees and to remove office objections. Such undertaking is normally recorded either on presentation form or in the circulation Note filed by the Advocate for urgent circulation. Office to place report within six weeks. Judge. Judge. Judge.