IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8274 of 2008 KEDAR PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR With CR. MISC. NO.8582 OF 2008 Pinki Nut @ Pinki Devi Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR 3 14.07.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned P.P. appearing on behalf of the State in connection with Cr.Misc. No.8274 of 2008 on behalf of Kedar Pandey and Cr. Misc. No.8582 of 2008 filed on behalf of Pinki Nut @ Pinki Devi. In the written report Rajendra Tiwary alleged that his daughter Suman Devi married two and half years earlier with Bhanu Pratap Pandey, had gone to her matrimonial house in connection with delivery of her Bhabhi. She was missing since last 10-15 days and on search informant came to know that she has been enticed away by the petitioner Kedar Pandey. In course of investigation the victim was produced by the petitioner Pinki Devi to the police. The victim has been examined under Section 164 Cr.P.C., in which she has stated that she was brutally assaulted by her maternal aunt and her family members and hence she left the house and thereafter she was taken to Pinki Devi and sold by the petitioner Kedar Pandey in four lakhs. While she was being taken to Mumbai for dancing then she came to the Police Station. In her statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C. the victim has given different statement, in that she has named the petitioner Kedar Pandey, and that statement has not corroborated from her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. She has been produced by the petitioner Pinki Devi before police. Considering a number of contradictions in the F.I.R. the petitioners namely, Kedar Pandey and Pinki Nut @ Pinki Devi are ordered to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sasaram(T) P.S. Case No.426 of 2007. Mkr. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J)