IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Contempt Petition No. 214 of 2005 Smt. Vidya Arya …Petitioner Versus Sri Ranvir Singh Chauhan & others …Respondents Mr. Sharad Sharma, Advocate for petitioner Mr. Kailash Tiwari, Brief Holder for State/respondents. Dated: December 22, 2008 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. By way of this contempt petition under Section 10/12 of Contempt of Courts Act read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for summoning the contemnor personally before the Court and initiating contempt proceedings against him for violating the order dated 18.8.2004 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 810 of 2004 (M/B), Smt. Vidya Arya versus State of Uttaranchal and others. Heard Sri Sharad Sharma, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Kailash Tiwari, learned Brief Holder for respondents and perused the record. The counter affidavit filed by Sub-Divisional Magistrate indicates that he provided the opportunity to the concerned parties and thereafter passed a detailed order on 18.10.2008. The order passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate has been annexed as Annexure-1 to the affidavit of compliance filed by Sub-Divisional Magistrate himself as well as to the explanation filed by Sub- Divisional Magistrate subsequently on 31st October, 2008. The order dated 18.10.2008 clearly indicates that the Sub-Divisional Magistrate conducted the detailed enquiry, recorded the statements of concerned parties and thereafter passed the order. In case, if the petitioner has any grievance against the order dated 18.10.2008 passed by Sub- Divisional Magistrate, then he may seek redressal of his grievance by adopting the available remedy in law. Anyway, the case against respondents for committing contempt of Court is not made out at this stage. Accordingly, contempt petition is dismissed. Notice issued against respondent no. 1 is hereby discharged. (B.C. Kandpal, J.) SP