1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4197 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.527 OF 1996 Rita Jagdish Tandon ..Plaintiff. Vs. Sunita Somnath Seth and others ..Defendants. .... Mr. M.M. Vashi for the Plaintiff. Mr. M.A. Sayed for Defendants 1 to 3. .... CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 29th February, 2008. P.C. : The learned advocate appearing for the First Defendant has stated that the papers have already been returned to the client and that there is no objection if the First Defendant engages some other advocate. The learned advocate for the Second and Third Defendants states that he has now been instructed to appear on behalf of the First Defendant as well and states that he has also lodged his Vakalatnama which was under objection for want of N.O.C. of the earlier advocate. Since the earlier advocate has furnished her N.O.C., the registry is directed to accept the fresh Vakalatnama filed on behalf of the First Defendant. 2 2. The Notice of Motion has been instituted for vacating the interim order dated 8th August, 2001 in respect of a property described in item No.3 of Exhibit F to the Plaint. This property comprises of a building situated at 6/8, Dwarka-Ashish, Jambulwadi, Kalbadevi, Mumbai -400 002. The ad interim order of 8th August, 2001 was passed with the consent of the parties. Both Counsel appearing for the Plaintiff and for the Defendants are agreed that the ad interim order may be vacated to the extent prayed in the present Notice of Motion. The Motion is accordingly made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) by consent. *****