IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 10TH DECEMBER 2010 / 19TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 4654 of 2008(D) -------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- MADHAVANUNNI.C, S/O. LATE RAMAN, AGED 43 YEARS, CHALLIYIL HOUSE, KARAMPUZHA, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW ABRAHAM RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE TAHSILDAR, OTTAPPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OTTAPPALAM, PALAKKAD. R1 & R2 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.SANTHOSHKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs/ ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 4654 of 2008 D ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 10th day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T Prayer sought in this writ petition is to quash Ext.P6, an order passed by the first respondent, directing that caste certificate will be issued to the petitioner certifying that the petitioner is Thiyya for claiming benefits meant for Other Backward Community. This order was issued as early as on 22-06-2001. Challenging this order, petitioner had filed OP.No.21685/2001 and that OP was disposed of by Ext.P7 judgment relegating the petitioner to seek appellate remedies. It is seen from Ext.P7(a) order, that subsequently the petitioner got the time for filing an appeal enlarged by filing IA.No.10600/07. It is thereafter that this writ petition is filed again challenging Ext.P6 order. 2. In view of Exts.P7 and P7(a), the aforesaid judgment and the order, it is impermissible for the petitioner to again approach this Court for the very same relief that is to W.P.(C) No.4654/08 : 2 : get Ext.P6 quashed. Writ petition fails and it is dismissed. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge