IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.12238 of 2008 Between: Kummari Venkata Lakshmi W/o. Vasanth Near Krishnudu Temple, Durgada Village, Gollaprolu Mandal, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd., Rep. bys its Secretary, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintendent Engineer A.P. Transco, Near Godavari River bund, Rajahmundry. 3 The Divisional Engineer, A.P. Transco, Ramaraopeta, Kakinada. 4 The Asst. Divisional Engineer, A.P. Transco, Agraharam, Pithapuram. 5 The Asst. Engineer, AP Transco, Gollaprolu, East Godavari District. 6 Sri Gollapalli Govinda Rao S/o. Bhavaraju R/o. Durgada Village, Gollaprolu Mandal, E.G. District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the impugned action of the respondents particularly the respondents 2 to 5 in not considering petitioner's representation dt. 24-5-2008 and transfer the service connection SC 532 (old 20849) lying her land to her name without following the due process of law as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice etc and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 5 to transfer the above said Service connection lying in the name of the 6th Respondent to the name of the petitioner and grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.N.V.ANANTHA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent No.: O.MANOHAR REDDY(SC FOR APTRANSCO) The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.12238 of 2008 ORDER: The only grievance of the petitioner is that there is a dispute with regard to transfer of Service Connection No.532 (old 20849) in respect of agricultural bore well situated at Durgada Village, Gollaprolu Mandal, East Godavari District. It is the case of the petitioner that the agricultural bore well is situated in the land of the petitioner and the Service Connection No.532 (old 20849) is in the name of the 6th respondent. It is stated that the 6th respondent also settled the accounts to transfer the said Service Connection in the name of the petitioner but, thereafter, he is objecting for the same and, therefore, the petitioner made a representation before respondents 2 to 5 on 24-05-2008 and the same is pending. I am not inclined to express any opinion as to whether the petitioner is entitled to get transfer of Service Connection No.532 (old 20849) in respect of the agricultural bore well situated at Durgada Village, Gollaprolu Mandal, East Godavari District, inspite of the objection by the 6th respondent. As the representation is said to have been pending before the 4th respondent, I am of the opinion that it is just and proper to direct the 4th respondent to consider and dispose of the representation, dated 24-05-2008. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 4th respondent to consider and dispose of the representation, dated 24- 05-2008, if any, received and pending, after hearing both the petitioner as well as the 6th respondent, in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. __________ 13-06-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VSMI}