IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.M No.20499 of 2008 and C.W.P No. 17752 of 2007 Date of decision : December 12, 2008 Pritam Singh Chhabra ...... Petitioner through Mr.Y.P.Singla, Advocate v. State of Punjab and others ...... Respondents through Mr.Anil Sharma, Sr.DAG Punjab CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) This petition is stated to be covered by the Division Bench judgment of this Court dated 21.07.2008 rendered in CWP No.15554 of 2007, Gian Chand and others vs State of Punjab and others. From a perusal of the averments made in the writ petition, these facts are borne out, however, learned Sr. DAG, Punjab states that this writ petition was admitted straightway and till date no written statement has been filed. On facts, he cannot distinguish the judgment given in CWP No.15554 of 2007, Gian Chand and others vs State of Punjab and others. In these circumstances, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms as in CWP No.15554 of 2007. The petitioner is also entitled for the revised computation of pension and other benefits, as per circular letter C.W.P No. 17752 of 2007 ::2:: No.3/13/2001-3FPPC/6587 dated 31.10.2006. However, it is made clear that in case on subsequent verification it transpires that on facts the case of the petitioner is not covered by the above said judgment, it would be open to the State to move for modification of this order. ( AJAY TEWARI ) December 12 , 2008. JUDGE `kk'