CRM NO. M-12561 OF 2011(O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM NO. M-12561 OF 2011(O&M) DECIDED ON : 09.12.2011 Mukul Jain and another ...Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents a n d CRM NO. M-14792 OF 2011(O&M) Raj Kumar and another ...Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI Present : Mr. G. S. Gill, Advocate, for the petitioners in CRM No. M-12561 of 2011. Mr. P. R. Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioners in CRM No. M-14792 of 2011. Mr. Amandeep Singh, AAG, Haryana. Mr. R. M. Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 6 along with Mr. Aman Pratap Singh CRM NO. M-12561 OF 2011(O&M) -2- K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL) CRM NO. 66398-99 OF 2011 The application stands allowed and the documents are taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. MAIN CASE By this common order, I intend to dispose of two petitions bearing CRM No. M-12561 of 2011 titled as, “Mukul Jain and another vs. State of Haryana and others” and CRM No. M-14792 of 2011 titled as, “Raj Kumar and another vs. State of Haryana and others”, as they have arisen out of the same FIR. However, the facts are being taken from CRM No. M- 12561 of 2011. This is a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing FIR No.273 dated 18.08.2010 under Sections 120-B/420/467/468/469/470/471 of the Indian Penal Code registered at Police Station Sohna, District Gurgaon (Annexure P-1), on the basis of compromise, along with all subsequent proceedings arising from that FIR. As per the copy of affidavit of the complainant, the parties have arrived at a compromise. The civil suit has also been stated to be withdrawn. Learned counsel for respondents No.2 to 6 have also stated at the bar that compromise has been effected and the amount has been received by the respondents, as per the terms CRM NO. M-12561 OF 2011(O&M) -3- of compromise and they have no objection in quashing the present FIR. The matter involved is personal in nature which has been amicably settled between the parties. So, in view of the above circumstances and in view of authority reported as, “Kulwinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and others” 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the above said FIR stands quashed. Further proceedings in pursuant to that FIR also stands quashed. Both the petitions stand disposed of. DECEMBER 09, 2011 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE