IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 9406 of 1993 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- BHAGWANLAL KAPURCHAND & J B MODI CHARITABLE TRUST Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: NANAVATI & NANAVATI for Petitioner No. 1-2 MRS MANISHA LAVKUMAR SHAH, AGP, for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI Date of decision: 24/11/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. The petitioner has challenged the letter dated 29th June 1993 addressed to the Principal, B.K. Mody Government Pharmacy College, Rajkot, by the Director of Technical Education, Gujarat State and the letter dated 6th July 1993 addressed to Shri J.B. Mody, Bhagvanlal K. Mody and Smt Jayakuvar B. Mody Charitable Trust by the Primcipal, B.K.Mody Govt. Pharmacy College, Rajkot, whereby the respondent showed their inability to give admission on Doner's Seat in First Year B. Pharm Class. 2. The issue raised in the present petition is squarely covered by the ratio laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of State of Gujarat Vs. Meghji Pethraj Shah Charitable Trust and others, reported in JT 1994(3) SC 96 and in the case of Unnikrishnan J.P. Vs. State of A.P., reported in JT 1993(1) SC 474. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to dispute this position. Under the circumstances the prayers claimed in the present petition cannot be granted. The petition is, therefore, rejected. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. [K.S. JHAVERI, J.] *ar*