IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 2163 of 1999 Between: 1 Md.Akthar Pasha S/o. Md. Roshan Ali, H.No. 12-1-137/1, Lalapet, Secunderabad-500017. 2 VLS Ravi Kumar Vangala, S/o. Venkatarammana Rao, H.No. 4-31/1, Snahapuri Colony, New Nagole Hyderabad-500035. 3 Saik Umar Shariff S/o. Sk Buran shariff D.No. 2069, Type. A.%.NH.5 BHEL, Ramachandrapuram, Medak District. 4 P.Satish Reddy S/o. Linga Reddy, H.No. 109-104/4/A, Ramnagar, Secunderabad-500048. 5 Vinod Kumar S/o. K.Narsimha, H.No. 12-8-301/3, Allugaddabavi, Sfecunderabad- 500 017, 6 K.Satyanarayana S/o. K.Sanyasi, C/o. Bansehab, H.No. 7-1-307/16/9, Subhashnagar, Sanathnagar, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND General Manager (Admn),Ordinance Factory Project, Eddumilaram Shankerpally, Medak District. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ or orders or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent for not allowing the petitioners to attend interview for the posts of 'Clerk' and to fill up these posts through Employment Exchange as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of fundamental rights and consequently direct the respondent to allow the petitioners to attend interview for the vacancies of 'Clerk' as per their qualification and issue appointment orders, if selected in the interview without insiting that the petitioners should be sponsored by the Employment Exchange as and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.RAGHAVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.K.MANIK PRABHU The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 2163 of 1999 ORDER: Yesterday i.e. on 01.06.2009 when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners was absent. Hence the matter was directed to be listed under the caption for dismissal today. Even today also when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners is absent and there is no representation on his behalf. Hence the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No order as to costs. ---------------- 02.06.2009 kvsn THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 2163 of 1999 02.06.2009 Kvsn