- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.327 OF 2007 IN CRI.APPEAL NO.892 OF 2005 Sanjay Kalappa Bansode ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... Ms.Pooja Bhojne Advocate for Applicant Mrs.A.S.Pai APP for State ... CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, AND CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, AND CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : JULY 20, 2007 DATE : JULY 20, 2007 DATE : JULY 20, 2007 P.C. [ PER SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]: P.C. [ PER SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]: P.C. [ PER SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]: 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is convicted under Section 302 of IPC. The applicant had earlier preferred application for bail which came to be rejected by this Court. No fresh ground has been made out for entertaining the present application. Simply - 2 - because sometime has elapsed since the earlier application was rejected, we do not think that this is sufficient ground to entertain the present application for bail. 3. Application is rejected. [R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]