1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.09.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.(MD)No.10476 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 Madurai Central Market Tomato and English Vegetables Merchant Association represented by its President S.Neelamegam, Madurai ... Petitioner Vs. The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Anna Maligai, Madurai. ... Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to demolish the wall constructed in the western entrance in the Mattuthavani Vegetable Market, Madurai to enable the customers and merchants to have access into the market freely. For Petitioner ... Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah For Respondents ... Mr.M.Jothi Basu ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to demolish the wall constructed in the western entrance in the Mattuthavani Vegetable Market, Madurai to enable the customers and merchants to have access into the market freely. 2. Heard Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.M.Jothi Basu, learned Counsel who takes for the respondent. 3. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. On 09.09.2011, the petitioner has given a representation to the respondent with regard to removal of wall constructed in the western entrance in the Mattuthavani Vegetable Market, Madurai which is inconvenience to the public and merchants. Since the said representation has not been considered so far, the writ petition has been filed by the petitioner. 5. The learned Counsel for the respondent states that the authority will consider the representation of the petitioner on its own merits and in accordance with law. 6. Without going into the merits of the petitioner's claim, the respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 09.09.2011 on its own merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 is made clear that this Court does not express any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's case and the authority shall consider the same on its own merits. 7. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Consequently the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No Costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) To: The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Anna Maligai,Madurai. +1cc to Mr.Jothi Basu, Advocate, SR.No.31637 ss1 GH : 20.09.2011 : 2p/3c W.P.(MD)No.10476 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 15.09.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/