IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1258 of 2011 Nitu Kumari Versus The B.N.Mandal University & Ors. 2/ 17/08/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the University. Learned counsel for the University submits that the petitioner had pursued part-1 and 2 of the course from the Lalit Narayan Mithila University and part-3 from the B.N.Mandal University after bifurcation. The necessary information with regard to marks secured by the petitioner in part-1 and 2 under the Lalit Narayan Mithila University is not being made available inasmuch as the tabulation register does not bear her marks. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the candidature has not been questioned. While disposing the writ application itself the Court had noticed the objection of the University with regard to the delay for declaration of results made in the year-2010 for the session as old as 1989-1992. It was also observed that it may require hunting out of records. The petitioner must also share a part of the blame. Once efforts have been made by the opposite parties and records are not easily forthcoming, the 2 Court finds it difficult to proceed against them in contempt jurisdiction as apparently the order appears to be difficult for compliance for reasons which cannot be attributed to the opposite parties alone. The application stands disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)