IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 20TH JULY 2009 / 29TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 11678 of 2009(D) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------------ K.K.REVAMMA, AGED 56 YEARS, W/O.JAGAL PRASAD.K., "PANICKERS", M.N.H-5, MALLOOR NAGAR, VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.B.HARISH KUMAR RESPONDENTS : -------------------------- 1. THE CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. TOWN PLANNING OFFICER, TOWN PLANNING OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. JOHN KUTTY.M., 'VINOD BHAVAN', RAJEEV NAGAR, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.N.NANDAKUMARA MENON, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR R1&2 SRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR FOR R1&2 SRI.G.SUDHEER FOR R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 11678 of 2009(D) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1: A TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 7/03/2006 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P2: A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE HUSBAND OF THE PETITIONER DATED 22/02/2006. EXHIBIT P3: A TRUE COPY OF THE INTIMATION NOTICE DATED 17/03/2006. EXHIBIT P4: A TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDING DATED 16/10/2008 ISSUDED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P5: A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 17/11/2008 SUBMITTED BY THE HUSBAND OF THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P6: A TRUE COPY OF THE INTIMATION LETTER DATED 18/12/2008 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P7: A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 30/03/2009 BY THE PETITIONER'S HUSBAND. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE rhs S. SIRI JAGAN, J ............................................... W.P(C) No. 11678 of 2009 ................................................. Dated this the 20th day of July, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved by the alleged inaction on the part of the 1st respondent in taking proceedings for demolition of certain alleged unauthorised construction made by the 3rd respondent. Earlier on a petition filed by the husband of the petitioner the 1st respondent had issued communications to the petitioners husband stating that appropriate proceedings have been taken for demolition of the unauthorised construction alleged to have been made by the 3rd respondent. The petitioner submits that although Ext.P6 was issued on 18.12.2008 no further steps have been taken. Having heard all parties, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to take the proceedings stated to have been taken by the 1st respondent as evidenced by Exts.P5 and P6 and take the same to its logical conclusion, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as the 3rd respondent. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE rhs