IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 5TH OCTOBER 2009 / 13TH ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 22851 of 2009(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- V.MOIDEENKUTTY, S/O.MOHAMMED, AGED 52 YEARS, HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (SOCIAL STUDIES), NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL, KOLATHUR, MALAPPURAM (RESIDING AT VAKAYILTHODI, P.O.KOLATHUR, MALAPPURAM - 679 338) BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, MALAPPURAM. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MALAPPURAM. 4. THE MANAGER, NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL, P.O.KOLATHUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 5. THE HEADMASTER, NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL, P.O.KOLATHUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. R1 TO R3 BY G.P. SMT. SREELATHA ADV. SRI.T.A.SHAJI FOR R4-5 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX EXT.P1-TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT DATED 2.3.2009 EXT.P2-TRUE COPY OF JUDGMET OF THIS COURT IN WPC 8684/09 DT.18.3.2009 EXT.P3-TRUE COPY OF GO DATED 16.7.2009 EXT.P4-TRUE COPY OF REQUEST OF THE PETITIONER DT.27.7.2009 EXT.P5-TRUE COPY OF DO. DATED 27.7.09 EXT.P6-TRUE COPY OF GO. DATED 1.8.2009 EXT.P7-TRUE COPY OF PETITION FILED BY THE MANAGER DATED 29.7.2009 //TRUE COPY // P.S. TO JUDGE T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.22851 of 2009-B - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 5th day of October, 2009. JUDGMENT Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the 4th respondent Manager. The petitioner has filed this writ petition aggrieved by Exts.P6 and P7. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the 4th respondent that the suspension ordered against the petitioner stands withdrawn and the petitioner has been ordered to be reinstated in service. In that view of the matter, it is not necessary to consider the validity of Exts.P6 and P7. In the light of the order reinstating the petitioner in service, no further orders are required in this writ petition. If the petitioner has got any other grievance,he can approach the appropriate authorities in the matter. The writ petition is closed. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/