0 O C-\ • l ^^:....^r- ^"ylN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^? f 9^ OF 2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS / Sudhir Kumar Dixit, son of Late Ramkumar Dixit, aged about 20 years; present resident at Vinoba Nagar, Gali No.R/2, Bilaspur, District-Bilaspur(Chhattisgarh) VERSUS ^1) State of Chhattisgarh, through: The Secretary, Sports & Youth Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2) Director, Sports & Youth Welfare Department, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3) Inspector General of Police (Administration), Police Headquarter, Civil Lines, Raipur, District-Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 4) Inspector General of Police, Bilaspur, District-Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 5) Superintendent of Police, Raigarh, District-Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) / ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA •u^a.ll-r^ HIQH COURT OrCHHAmSOARH AT BILASPBR SB : HON'BLB MR. JUSTTOE PRITIKKER DIWAKBR W.P.(S».KO.5817/2011 PBTITIONER Sudhir Kumar Dixit versus RESPONDBNTS State ofC.O. 8s Others Shri V.K.Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, P.L. for the State. WRIT PE?TITION ITNDBR ARTICLB 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORDBR (28.09.2011) Grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that his father late Rain Kumar Dtxit was working as Lower Division Clerk in the police department who died in harness on 22.4.99. F\irther contention of the petitioner is that at the time of death of his father he was minor and after attaining majority in the year 2009, immediately he made a request for compassionate appointment but tUl date the same has not been granted to him, Counsel for the petitioner submits that various representations inade by the petitioner are pending before the resp. No.2 and the purpose of ffling this petition would be served if direction is issued to the resp. No.2 to decide the pending representations of the petitioner. On the other hand, State counsel submits that let the petitioner make a fresh representation an'd the sarne would be decided by the authority concemed in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. In the eventuality of making any representation by the petitioner within three weeks from today, it is expected from the resp, No.2 to decide the same as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of fdhr months from the date of receipt of the said representation. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the authority concemed would be at liberty to decide the representation strictly in accordance with law. Sd/- Pritiiiker Dswaker Judge