IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10955 of 2011 NAND KISHORE CHAUBEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 25.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 12.01.2011 in a case registered under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 406, 385 and 381/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioner being the collecting agent of the M/s Jouharilal Agrawal Sales Pvt. Ltd., is of misappropriation of Rs. 25,00,000/-. It is alleged that accused persons including the petitioner fled away to Kolkata along with a brief case containing three important files, laptop and Rs. 50,000/-. It is alleged against Raju Chaubey to have demanded Rs. 10,00,000/- on telephone. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner never worked in the firm of the informant. The sons of the petitioner worked in 2 other firm, which is owned by the brother of the informant. Learned counsel for the informant submits that during the investigation, it has come that the petitioner was also employed in the firm of the informant and after investigation, the charge sheet has been submitted. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City in connection with Khajekalan P.S. Case No. 111/2010. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)