fr"!ft. •wi-^JV IN THE HQN'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR M.C.C.NO. <(5L\ /2011 •^ffiS^ 9sn-ffs- APPLICANTS APPELLANTS ^'.'./w •tT .*' A "< :€•'- -'v /^ / 1] 2-] 3] 4] Mangtin aged about 60 years,W/o. Ram Prasad R/o. Odan, Tahsil Baloda Bazar, District Raipur (C.G.) (since Died) Mantora, aged about 58 years, W/o. Milau, R/o. Village - Sakri, Tahsil- Bak)da Bazar, District Raipur (C.G.) Mantoriya , a@ed about 55 years, W/o. Bhulau, R/o. Village Sasha , Tahsil- Baloda Bazar , District Raipur (C.G.) Fekan, aged about 50 years, W/o. Bisambhar, R/o. Village- Sonar Deori, Tahsil- Baloda Bazar, District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS NON-APPLICANT 1] RESPONDENTS 2] SadaiTam, aged about 45 years, S/o. Dhanau Kuteliha, R/o. Village - Kumhari, Tahsil & Distt . Raipur (C.G.) Bhaw Singh, aged about 40 years, W/o. Gokul Sahu, R/o. Village- Kumhari, Tahsil & District Raipur (C.G.) APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF FIRST APPEAL No. 81 /20Q{^DISM!SSED INDEFAULT r -HC—78 sn^r'aafetN' ?qt'STi^I ^liW A^ "g'Sj' 'r^n^Tr^ s7rtT3:TTT>3 T^:iT<TlT? ..M.-fi.fc..t^:.,.6.s.^ '\ TOnwgftasn^i ^iNCTlN TTfERfl' ~? fS^! •?N'??T( ih atiTnsn^i s. HON'BL! ICER 2< nn's< »<r \/iln-am niv'i* <~ !Vir. ViKram UiXit, counse! Counselforthepetitione 1SC] IUI UIC pCUUUIIC^S The petitioners are se se4king restoration of F.A. No.81/2000 which was dismlssed for w^nt of prosecution vide order dated 02.08.2011 On duc consideration of the submissions of ths learned counse! 'o>|inds taken in the restoration petition, i am satisfied that the absejice of the petitioners' counsel on [2000 was taken-up for hcaring was for the petitioners and fhe groi 02.09.2011 vvhen F.A. No.81 !My,Q 1 based on bons ffcfe M.C.C. No.654/2011, th^ is restored to its oriyina! numb^r Certified copy, as per rulj ,K. AGARWAL for the petitioners. s is heanj on restoration application. idrefore, is ailowed and F.A. No.81/2000 s^. ^.K.Agar^al iudge -<^