IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC NO.8922 OF 2009 HARI NARAYAN RAUT VERSUS (1) PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPN (2) MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, PMC, PATNA (3) THE CHIEF ENGINEER, PMC PATNA (4) T.P.S.MANUFACATURING & CONSTRUCTION CO. PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI. ----------- 2 03.08.2009. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner prays for issuance of a direction to respondent numbers 1 to 3 to disclose the reasons of disqualification of the technical bid of his company for supply of tools and equipments to Patna Municipal Corporation (PMC) in spite of fulfilling all the eligibility criteria of Tender call notice dated 30.4.2009 and further to restrain them from executing any contract/agreement with respondent number 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to aforesaid notice, his company had submitted tender papers fulfilling all the eligibility criteria, but in stead of allowing the tender in his favour, respondent number 3 informed him that his company’s technical bid has been disqualified. The petitioner submits that in any view of the matter, he is entitled at least a communication of the basis on which his company has been debarred from taking part in the tender. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to the petitioner to file a representation before respondent no.2 within ten days which would be disposed of by passing a speaking order within three weeks thereof. Needless to state that the petitioner is at liberty to press for any other relief before respondent no.2. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J).