IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 533 of 2009 Between : M. Anthony, S/o. Krishnan, Force NO. 771310202, R/o. 2nd Signal Battalion of CRPF, Chandrayangutta, Keshogiri Post, Hyderabad-500005. ..... PETITIONER A N D 1 The Government of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, South Block, New Delhi - 110 001. 2 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, A.P. 3 The Director General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force, CGO Complex, Lodi Road, New Delhi - 110 003. 4 The Deputy Director (Communication), CRPF Directorate General, CGO Complex, Lodi Road, New Delhi - 110 003. 5 The Commandant, 2nd Signal Battalion, CRPF, Chandrayangutta, Keshogiri Post, Hyderabad - 500 005. 6 The Inspector of Police, S.H.O., P.S., Chandrayangutta, Keshogiri Post, Hyderabad - 500 005. 7 Mr. Chettan Kumar Cheetah, Deputy Commandant (Adm) 2nd Signal Battalion, CRPF, Hyderabad 500 005. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 6th respondent in not registering the F.I.R. against the 7th respondent on the complaint dated 13-01-2009 lodged by the petitioner as arbitrary illegal and unjust and consequently to direct the 6th respondent to register F.I.R. and take actions as per law. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI NARINDER PAL SINGH Counsel for the Respondents: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) G.P. FOR HOME SRI M.GANGA RAO The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.533 of 2009 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition stating that subsequent to filing of the writ petition, the 6th respondent registered a case against the 7th respondent, basing on the complaint given by the petitioner, and hence, no orders need be passed in the writ petition. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. _____________ N.V.RAMANA,J 12.02.2009 v v