IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35891 of 2009 ROCKY @ ROCKY SALMAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 23/02/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The defence of the petitioner in a Police case under Section 392 of the Penal Code is that his name has transpired on the confessional statement of a co-accused. The F.I.R. being against unknown for Motor-cycle loot at the point of Pistol and he is in custody since 20.8.2009. It is acknowledged that the petitioner has one more antecedent under Section 392 of the Penal Code and the looted Motor-cycle was recovered from the co-accused who named the petitioner. Considering the custody let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 40,000/- (Forty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Mansoorchak P.S. Case No. 45 of 2008. Both the sureties of the petitioner must be his father and mother respectively whose photographs and proof of residence shall be appended to the bail bonds, to be verified through the Police before final acceptance of 2 the same. If the petitioner absents from trial the court below shall equally be at liberty to proceed against the sureties appropriately also. If the petitioner is involved in any other case during the pendency of the present trial it shall be a clear case of misuse of privilege of bail rendering the present bail liable to cancellation to be considered by the court below itself. P.K. ( Navin Sinha, J.)