r^ HIQKeeyRTOFCHHATTtSGARHAT BIU^PUR Writ Petition fSV No.638 of 2008 Petitioner Versus Respondents 1 3. 4. Btarat Singh Armo, aged about 47 years, S/o Shri Senrid Armo, Assistant T^Ksher Govemmert: Primary School. lOiurpa, Block- MarwaM, Di^rk* - Bltaspur (C.G.) State of CWialtisgarh, Through Secretaiy, School Education Depaittnent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C^ The Dtrector Publte InstrucUon Cte(rartmentRaipur(C.G.) District Educatton OfRcer Bilaspur<C.G.} Btock Educatton Offlcer K<te; Dlstrict- Bilaspur(C.G.) WRrr PETITOIN UNDER ARTICLE 2260F THE CONSnTUnON OF IND Singte Bench : Hon'bte Mr. Saflsh K. Agnihotri, J. J^ Shri Dhirendra Mlshra, Advocateforttie petitioner. ShriAlokBakshi.Govt.Advocatefortheraspcmdenls. ORALORDER (Passad ori this SE^ day of Februaiy, 2008) 1. The p^itroner was appointed tnjfially, on a fixed pay of fte. 15W-. The petiUoner was thereafter.granted ri^ular pay scate on completi<xi <rf the probation period. 2. The questton of tew Invotved herein is, asto whether the petiUoner is entiUed to regular payaate w.e.f. ttie dats ofinifial appointmentor from the date ofcompletion of probiA'on period. 3. Leamed counsel appearing lor ttie petiSoner.as well as teamed coureel appearing for frie respondents/State, jointly submit ftat e facte and question of law, involved in the present writ pefition, are the same asto that of in W.P.(S) No. 813/2007 ( Ram Kumar Sahu & others Vs. State Govt. of ChhatUsgarh & anofter), which was altowed videorder dated 12.2^007. 4. In view of the above-stated submissions macte by leamed counsel appearing for ttie parUes, the writ petition is altowed In the same terms i.e. peUtioner is entitted for regular pay scate w.e.f. fte date of (nltial appointment, subjecttowrificafion ofUlefacts.NooKierastoGoste. Thakur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ---!;•