IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13286 of 2007 CHUNNU TENT HOUSE AND MUNNU SARAN BAND, JUBLEE MARKET STATION ROAD, NAWADA THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MD MUMTAZ ALAM, SON OF LATE HAJI MUNNU, RESIDNT OF MOHALLA ANSAR NAGAR, POLICE STAITON - NAWADA, DISTRICT – NAWADA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, MAIN SECRETARIATE, PATNA. 3. THE COMMISSIONER, GAYA. 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, NAWADA. ----------- 02. 03.03.2010 On the representation filed by the petitioner as well as on the direction of this Court passed in CWJC No. 900 of 2007, a reasoned order, contained in Annexure-6, has come to be passed. Some part of the claim of the petitioner has been accepted, other parts have been denied on the basis of so- called verification of records available with the Nawada Collectorate. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that finding recorded therein is contrary to the actual state of affairs and various notings in the file. Obviously there is no common Meeting ground on the claim of the petitioner and the liability thrust upon the respondents. If Annexure-6 does not satisfy the petitioner then he may decide to file money suit in this regard with due evidence. So far as writ petition is concerned, no direction can be issued in favour of the petitioner for the reasons indicated in Annexure-6. 2 The writ application stands dismissed with liberty above. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J )