IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8509 of 2010 ANIKA YADAV @ LALAJEE, SON OF BISHU YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12/03/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It has been alleged in the First Information Report that on the assurance of the deceased, the petitioner and one Bhuna Yadav received a loan of certain amount of money which they were not returning and, therefore, the money lender got angry and a dispute arose between the present petitioner and the deceased. On the date of occurrence, the deceased was shot dead by four persons namely, Ranjit Mandal, Indradev Yadav, Narayan Yadav and Subhash Nonia. Taking into consideration the fact that since the petitioner is not said to be the assailant of the deceased, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 30.11.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai, in connection with Halsi (Ramgarh Chowk) P.S. Case No. 109 of 2008 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii)That the - 2 - affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)