IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN TUESDAY, THE 6TH DECEMBER 2011 / 15TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 25153 of 2011(T) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- HARIS.B., MUMTHAS MANZIL, P.O. KOTTALLI, KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR-670 001. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. G. GOPAKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: VPV WPCNO.25153/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE REQUEST SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 19/08/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JDUGE VPV P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ----------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.25153 of 2011 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondent to consider Ext.P1 application filed by the petitioner for revision of the time schedule of his stage carriage. When the writ petition came up for admission hearing today, Sri.G.Gopakumar, learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent, submitted on instructions that Ext.P1 was considered and orders have been passed on 2.12.2011. Such being the situation, no further orders are called for in this writ petition. It is accordingly closed. The respondent shall communicate a copy of the order passed by him on Ext.P1 to the petitioner forthwith. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the decision taken by the respondent on Ext.P1 application, it will be open to him to challenge the same under section 90 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1989 before the State Transport Appellate Tribunal. P.N.RAVINDRAN, Judge. ahg. P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. --------------------------- W.P(C).No.25153 of 2011 ---------------------------- JUDGMENT 6th December, 2011