IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 23574 of 2008 Between: Narayana Majji S/o.Anandu Majji R/o.Padda Village, Meliyaputti Mandal, Srikakulam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of A.P. rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Irrigation & CAD Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, (Irrigation Wing), Srikakulam, Srikakulam District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 2nd respondent in considering the petitioner's representation dated 4.10.2008 and in taking appropriate action to stop the unauthorized agricultural and ﬁsh culture activities being conducted in Mukunda Sagaram Tank in Padda Village, Miliyaputti Mandal, Srikakulam District as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to initiate appropriate action in this regard to restore the Mukunda Sagaram Tank to its original standards, and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.ROY REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR IRRIGATION & COMM AREA DEV. The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 23574 of 2008 O R D E R: This writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “To issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 2nd respondent in considering the petitioner's representation dated 4.10.2008 and in taking appropriate action to stop the unauthorized agricultural and ﬁsh culture activities being conducted in Mukunda Sagaram Tank in Padda Village, Miliyaputti Mandal, Srikakulam District as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to initiate appropriate action in this regard to restore the Mukunda Sagaram Tank to its original standards, and pass such other order or orders.” Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Irrigation appearing for the respondents, without expressing any opinion as to the correctness of the allegations made by the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 04-10-2008 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI,J Date: 30-10-2008 KLP