IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6937 of 2009 Date of Decision : 27.11.2009 Ram Chand .....Petitioner versus The Tehsildar Sales, Ludhiana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Jigyasa Tanwar, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) In this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the plaintiff-petitioner seeks directions to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana, to decide the Civil Suit No.4, dated 6.1.2006, titled 'Tehsildar versus Gurdial Singh etc.”, expeditiously and in a time bound manner. {2} Relying upon the zimini orders passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana from time to time, it is urged on behalf of the petitioner that the respondents are adopting delaying tactics on one pretext or the other. {3} Having heard counsel for the petitioner at some length, I am C.R. No.6937 of 2009 (O&M) 2 of the considered view that though it is difficult to issue any time bound directions as there might be other civil suits filed at an earlier point of time and still pending consideration before the Civil Judge and no out of turn treatment can, therefore, be given to the civil suit filed by the petitioner, however, like any other litigant, the petitioner is also entitled to the speedy disposal of his case. {4} This revision petition is, accordingly, disposed of with a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana, to make an endeavour to decide the civil suit No.4 dated 6.1.2006, titled as Tehsildar versus Gurdial Singh etc. as early as possible and preferably within a period of two year. {5} Disposed of. {6} Dasti. 27-11-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE