IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.700 of 2009 Suresh Kumar Srivastava Versus Ram Ekbal Rai & Ors ---------------------------------- 07. 19.12.2011 Mr.Nagendra Rai, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that by the impugned order the court below has rejected his prayer that the execution of the decree has not been fully satisfied and therefore the proceedings of the execution case should continue and as such it is interlocutory in nature. He has prayed for converting this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in view of the law laid down by a Division Bench of this Court in Durga Devi Vs. Vijay Kumar Poddar, reported in 2010(2)PLJR 954. The learned counsel for the opposite parties is also present. The prayer is allowed. The petitioner is granted four weeks time to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, failing which this revision application shall stand rejected without further reference to the bench. Nitesh ( V. Nath, J.)