wp2681-79-80.doc 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2681 OF 2011 Raja Ramcharan Ram Rao .. Petitioner versus Smt.Satybhama A. Rajapure & Ors .. Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.2679 OF 2011 Raja Ramcharan Ram Rao .. Petitioner versus Ramesh Mahadev Surve & Ors .. Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.2680 OF 2011 Raja Ramcharan Ram Rao .. Petitioner versus Prakash D. Parab & Ors .. Respondents Mr.M.D.Mahopatra i/by Mrs.Divya Trivedi for the petitioner. Mr.A.S.Uraizee for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.R.A.Thorat for respondent Nos.3 to 5. CORAM : B.R.GAVAI, J. 5th MAY 2011. P.C.: . The petitioner challenges the order passed by the Appellate Bench of the Small Causes Court vide which an appeal filed by the respondent Nos.3 to 5 came to be allowed and the wp2681-79-80.doc 2 order of status-quo granted in favour of the defendant No.1 by the trial Court came to be vacated. 2 The perusal of the order passed by the learned trial Court would reveal that the application for temporary injunction was made by the plaintiff. The learned trial Court rejected the application of the plaintiff. However, without there being any application by the defendant No.1, the learned trial Court granted status-quo at the request of the defendant No.1 against the respondent Nos.3 to 5. The learned Appellate Bench of the Small Causes Court has reversed the same on the ground that no such application for temporary injunction was made by the defendant No.1 and as such order of status-quo could not have been granted at the instance of the defendant No.1. 3 No perversity is noticed in the order impugned warranting interference in the extra-ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Writ petition is rejected. (B.R.GAVAI, J)