1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 221 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 221 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 221 OF 2006 IN IN IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 57 OF 2007 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 57 OF 2007 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 57 OF 2007 Deepali Anand Shinde. .. Applicant. vs. Anand Sudam Shinde. .. Respondent. Mr. S.S. Kulkarni for Applicant. Coram: J.N. PATEL &, Coram: J.N. PATEL &, Coram: J.N. PATEL &, A.A. SAYED, JJ. A.A. SAYED, JJ. A.A. SAYED, JJ. Date: 23RD APRIL, 2007. Date: 23RD APRIL, 2007. Date: 23RD APRIL, 2007. P.C. . Heard. 2. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the respondent has been duly served though the office note says that notice issued to the respondent is yet to be returned. We accept the statement of the learned counsel for the applicant. 3. On ad-interim order we find that the rights of the applicant will have to be protected during the pendency of the appeal and, therefore, there will be an 2 interim order in terms of prayer clause (a) with liberty to the respondent to move the Court in case any contingency arises. 4. Civil Application No. 221 of 2006 stands disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. (J.N. Patel, J. ) (J.N. Patel, J. ) (J.N. Patel, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. )