1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Chamber Summons No. 578 of 2004 in Suit NO. 2629 of 2001 M/s. Nanabhoy Jeejeebhoy Pvt. Ltd. ... Plaintiffs vs. Prataprao Salunkhe ..... defendant Ms. S. Alemao for Plaintiffs Ms.Jyostna Vyas i/b. O. P. Pandya for defendants. CORAM: ROSHAN DALVI J. Date: 19/12 / 2005 P.C. The defendants have applied for inspection and for xerox copies of the documents relied upon by the Plaintiffs. The Plaintiffs advocate states that all these documents have been inspected by the defendant and compilation of the xerox copies of the documents have also been sent to the documents. She produces the registered post acknowledgment signed by the defendant on 5.4.2004. The defendant's advocate contends that though this packet has been received, the original documents are not 2 shown to them. The Plaintiffs' advocate has produced another set of compilation of documents. She has certified that the documents in the compilation are true copies of the original. The defendants advocate has seen each of these documents. The said compilation shall be handed over to the defendant's advocate by the Plaintiff's advocate forthwith. The defendant's advocate states that the certified copy of the Company Petition No. 868 of 1988 has not been received. The Plaintiffs' advocate shall supply xerox copy of the certified copy, certified as true copy by her to the defendant or his advocate within two weeks. Upon supply of the xerox copies of the documents, certified as true copies, the Plaintiffs will have sufficiently complied with the provisions of law requiring inspection / copies to be supplied to the defendant. No further direction needs to be passed in the Chamber Summons. Chamber Summons disposed of. No order as to costs. ( ROSHAN DALVI J.)