1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 924 OF 2009 AND ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 925 OF 2009 AND ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 926 OF 2009 Rukhsana S. Chamadia ...Petitioner. Vs. Narendra R. Sharma ...Respondent. Mr. Anjal Amin i/by M/s. B. Amin & Co. for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 5th December, 2009. P.C.- 1 The Petitioner has filed these petitions under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, the Arbitration Act), separately. 2 The Civil proceedings are pending including Appeal/Review. The Petitioner is at liberty to file appropriate applications, under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act, in the Civil Proceedings, which are pending. The present independent Petitions under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act, is not maintainable. 2 3 All these petitions are accordingly disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner to take appropriate applications in the Civil Proceedings. 4 No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)