IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.783 of 2008 MD. KAISHAR ALI @ TAMANNA .... Petitioner Versus 1.STATE OF BIHAR AND 2.CHANDNI PERVEEN .... Opposite Parties ----------- 5. 10.11.2008. N.H./ Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. No one appears on behalf of the opposite party no.2 inspite of service of notice. This petitioner is a juvenile. On perusal of the F.I.R., it appears that it is a consented sex on the pretext of marriage. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances, the provisional bail so granted to the petitioner vide order dated 14.8.2008 is hereby confirmed. ( Ghanshyam Prasad )