THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.31650 OF 2010 BETWEEN: Yellaboina Vani, W/o. Late Suryanarayana, R/o. Pandavula Metta, Peddapuram, East Godavari District. PETITIONER And 1. State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Secretary to Endowments Department, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad, and others. RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Nimmagadda Satyanarayana Counsel for the respondents. G.P. for Endowments. The Court made the following. ORDER: The petitioner, claiming to be the owner and possessor of an extent of Ac.5.87 cents of land situated in R.S.No.113/1 of Ramanayyapeta Village, Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District, has filed this writ petition complaining inaction on the part of the respondents 2 and 3, viz., the Regional Joint Commissioner, Endowments Department, Rajahmundry, and the Assistant Commissioner of Endowments, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District, in considering her representations dated 11.03.2010 and 2.06.2010. The petitioner states that an extent of Ac.5.87 cents of land situated in RS.No.113/1 originally belonged to Pithapuram Maharaja Estate and later the grandfather of the husband of the petitioner became the owner and occupier of the said land. The grandfather of the petitioner’s husband gifted and endowed an extent of Ac.0.80 cents to Nukalamma temple situated in the said village. It is stated that in respect of the remaining extent of Ac.5.00 of land, the ownership was retained with the original owner and the same has been inherited by the petitioner being the wife of the grandson of the original owner. The grievance of the petitioner is that in the guise of the endowment of only Ac.0.80 cents, the 3rd respondent-Assistant Commissioner is interfering with the entire land. The petitioner therefore submitted representation dated 11.03.2010 to the 3rd respondent to impress upon him that the property endowed was only to a limited extent of Ac.0.80 cents. As there was no response, the petitioner made representations dated 29.05.2010 and 2.06.2010 to the 2nd respondent. As the respondents have not considered the said representations, this writ petition has been filed for the aforesaid relief. The only grievance presented and canvassed by the petitioner in this writ petition is that although the aforesaid representations have been made long ago, the same have not been considered so far. Heard Sri Nimmagadda Satyanayana, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Endowments. Having regard to the short grievance of the petitioner, the 2nd respondent is directed to consider the representations submitted by the petitioner dated 29.05.2010 and 2.06.2010 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, as early as possible preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ NOUSHAD ALI, J. 19th January, 2011 Js.