BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^- APPLI&ANT ^FENDANT .^ ^y .^s-^ .^;^y. ^&'" ^y" j^^Q?- *y ^^y ^'.^f^ '<s'3^v INTHE MATTER OF C.R.NO. /2003 NON-^PLICANT QNTIFF jifi.inicipal Council, Raigarh, (Now / Municipal Corporation, Raigarh) through :• Chief Executive Officer / Commissioner, Municipal Council (Municipal Corporation) Raigarh (ChUatfisgarh) VERSUS '. Agrawal, aged about 48 years, son of Shri Ramkumar Agrawal, occupation - Well Boring contractor, resident of Daanipara, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) REVISIONPETITIONUNDERSEGTION 1150FTHECODEQF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 -HC—78 sn^i ^ii R;I WII stl^l a'*ilti T WW(T(b*<iq» ^5Er-l<l'4!d'4, ytil'H'IS, fqdl'M'J,< ^^..^..E1'..^^... o3 3iI^I'q?R? C^yy!) wiiw^iftdsn^ S.B. Hon'bie Shri Justice N.H Shri Pswan Kesharwani, Learned counsel appea +l<<fd41-f •qn?Tl'^ ^St TfW^R •^; sifgq sn^i [counse! for the applicant. [•ing for the applicant submits thai with the passage of time this re|/ision has become infructuous. Accordingly,. the revisi<tn is dismissed as has become infructuous. No order asto costs. Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge U"!iFi11P<lJ ;iii|:l: i" llT1!'r Eisae's^-ii^igg^ig^i^^^s^^i^^.siii.s.^sss^vA'a,~~^'7":T^pS!