IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.1141 of 2010 (M/S) Sachin Kumar Singh (Minor) .…Petitioner Versus Uttarakhand Shiksha Evam Prakash Parishad ...Respondent Mr. N.K. Papnoi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Negi, Advocate for the respondent. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for the following reliefs:- i. Issue writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to the respondents to reevaluate/scrutiny the answer sheets of the petitioner being roll no.0014906 of all subject and in case the petitioner gets more marks, then the petitioner be issued a fresh mark sheet of Intermediate Examination. ii. Issue writ rule or directions in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to the respondents to produce the answer sheets before this Hon’ble Court. iii. Issue any other writ rule or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner appeared in Intermediate Examination, 2010 with the subjects Hindi, English, Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry from S. Vidhya Mandir, Inter College, Dispatcher Dehradun. His roll number was 0014906. 2 Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is a student of Class XII and has excellent academic career. He did very well in his papers but marks awarded to him are less than his expectation while his grade is shown as A1. Therefore, on 04.06.2010 he applied for scrutiny and deposited the required fee. Learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that in these circumstances the answer sheet of the petitioner be revalued. This prayer of the petitioner cannot be allowed in view of the fact that there is no rule which provides revaluation and also in view of the law laid down in the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court reported in (1984)4 Supreme Court Cases 27, Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education vs. Paritosh Bhupeshkumar Seth & Others. However, since the petitioner has applied for the scrutiny and deposited the required fee in time, respondent is directed to scrutinize the answer sheets of the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of the order. The writ petition is disposed of. Interim Relief Application No.5353 of 2010 also stands disposed of. (V.K.Bist. J,) 07.07.2010 Arti 3