IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A.No.1578 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 23.4.2010 Lachhman ....Appellant Versus Jangsher ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr. Madan Gupta, Advocate for the appellant. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The defendant/appellant impugns the judgments of the learned trial Court dated 4.10.2007 and that of the first Appellate Court dated 4.2.2010. It is his positive case that he had purchased the property from the respondent. Both the appellant and the respondent had received some shares of the property by way of inheritance. The share which had come to the respondent is not disputed by the appellant. He says that the respondent had sold this property to him. But if the evidence on record is seen then the plea of the appellant is totally v ague about the factum of execution of the sale deed. Such factors have been duly noticed by the first Appellate Court. The appellant has pleaded that the sale deed was registered but it is not so. Similarly he had purchased the suit land for a sum of Rs.99/- whereas according to his admission the property is worth Rs.10,000/-. R.S.A.No.1578 of 2010 (O&M) -2- In view of the fact that the sale deed has not been duly proved, the plea of the appellant that he had purchased the property from the respondent, does not inspire any confidence. Accordingly, the plaintiff/respondent who had concededly asked for his share of the property had been rightly granted the same. Thus, there is no ground to interfere with the findings of fact determined by the first Appellate Court more so when no substantial question of law arises for the consideration of this Court. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. Consequently, the stay application is also dismissed. 23.4.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss