IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 28728 of 2008 Between: M. Jagan S/o. Bikshapati R/o. H.No. 6-11-476/21, Indira Nagar, Moosarambagh, Hyd. - 36. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Transport Department of Transport Hyderabad, A.P. 2 The Joint - Commissioner R.T.A., Ranga Reddy District Hyderabad, A.P. 3 The Registering Transport Authority Regional Transport Office Uppal, Ranga Reddy District. 4 Sri. K. Gopi Nath Registering Transport Authority Tirumalagiri, Secunderabad. 5 The E-Seva Counter Rep. by its Manager/Incharge Kothapeta HUDA Complex, Saroor Nagar, Cyberabad, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ or order especially in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring action of seizure/detention of vehicle bearing No. AP 28V 8498 by the 4th Respondent as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, unconstitutional and offends Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondent No. 3 and 4 to release the vehicle bearing No. AP 28V 8498. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.SANGAN NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR TRANSPORT The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.28728 OF 2008 ORDER : This writ petition is filed to declare the seizure/detention of the vehicle bearing No. AP 28V 8498 by the 4th respondent as arbitrary and illegal. It is alleged by the petitioner that in spite of the fact that the petitioner approached the 3rd respondent by producing the original documents for release of the vehicle, the same have not been considered. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Transport. Having regard to the facts and circumstances noticed above the writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to make an appropriate representation before the 3rd respondent for release of the seized vehicle enclosing all the relevant documents within a period of one(1) week from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. If any such representation is made the 3rd respondent shall receive the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of two(2) weeks thereafter. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J. Dt. 30.12.2008 Note: Issue CC by Tomorrow (B/O) *TSNR