Civil Revision No. 6239 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 6239 of 2010 Date of Decision: 27.9.2010 M.M. Sharma …Petitioner Versus Sukhdarshan Singh …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Gurdial Singh Jaswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) The Rent Controller, Chandigarh, vide his order dated 4.9.2010, has provisionally assessed the rent at the rate of Rs.1,750/- per month w.e.f. 1.6.2003 till the month of passing of the order along with the interest at the rate of 6% per annum and costs of Rs.1,000/-. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner had paid the rent to one Ajit Charan Singh Saraon. This argument was considered by the Rent Controller and came to the conclusion that no such instructions were given by the landlord. The petitioner may deposit the rent and thereafter he will be at liberty to file a counter claim for refund or adjustment of the rent, already paid. The parties may adduce their evidence to say as to whether Ajit Charan Singh Saraon was authorized to receive the rent or not. The impugned order dated 4.9.2010, whereby the provisional Civil Revision No. 6239 of 2010 2 rent was assessed, is interim in nature and the same cannot be varied in the revision petition. Another grievance made by learned counsel for the petitioner is that the provisional rent, so payable, has not been quantified by the Rent Controller. To allay this apprehension, the Rent Controller is directed that on the next date fixed in the eviction petition, he shall calculate the amount which is payable by the petitioner/tenant. Hence, no interference is warranted in the present revision petition and the same is hereby dismissed, in limine. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge September 27, 2010 “DK”