IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1428 of 2008 MURARI SAHTHALIA @ MURARI PRASAD SANTHALIA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16. 02. 09. In the instant application, the petitioner prays for setting aside the order dated 25. 10. 2008, passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai, in Lakhisarai P. S. Case No. 168/2008, for offence under Sections 465, 486 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The Marketing Officer, Lakhisarai, lodged a report that alleging therein that 40 bags of duplicate Taj Excel Detergent Power was found loaded in the truck. Bags and wrappers were also recovered on which Rohtak Harayana Company was written. It is further alleged that no licence was obtained for running the factory and the firm is not registered with Sales Tax Authorities. This Court for the present is not going into the merit of the case. In the view of the fact Detergent Powder is subject to decay, this Court is inclined to release the seized articles in favour of the petitioner on furnishing adequate security 15% of which will be in terms of cash security. The release of the goods in question will be subject to criminal prosecution. With the aforesaid direction, this application is allowed. m.p. (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)