S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Stay Application No.5086/2003. In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6139 of 2003. Dhapu & Others Vs. B.O.R. Ajmer & Others. Date Of Order ::: 07/03/2008. Hon'ble Mr. Narendra Kumar Jain J. Mr. Deepak Pareek, Counsel for the petitioners Mr. N.R. Choudhary, counsel for respondent nos.3 & 4/1 to 4/2 Mr. Ashish Jain, G.A. for respondent nos.1 & 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties on the stay application. The plaintiff/petitioners executed a registered sale-deed in favour of the contesting respondents in respect of the disputed land in the year 1962 and also handed over the possession thereof. The suit was filed after 23-years i.e. on 27.02.1985. The respondents submit that they are in possession of the disputed land, whereas the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the possession was handed over to the respondents in the year, 1962, but after the judgment of the Revenue Appellate Authority, it was directed that the possession of the disputed land may be handed over to the petitioner, but he is not aware as to whether actual physical possession was handed over to the petitioner or not. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the order of Revenue Appellate Authority was stayed by the Revenue Board and since 1962 the respondents are in possession of the disputed land. This Court did not grant any interim stay order at the time of issue of notice to show cause to the respondents and there is no interim stay order going-on in the case, till date in favour of the petitioners. In view of above, I do not find any ground to pass any interim stay order in favour of the petitioners, who are not in possession of the disputed land. The stay application is accordingly dismissed. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. ashok/