IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P. No. 623 of 1996 Date of Decision: July 19, 2011 Hazara Singh ….Petitioner Versus Kashmir Kaur. … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: None. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) I have gone through the record. In the present Contempt Petition, the petitioner alleged that LPA No. 941 of 1985 is pending in this Court and the Division Bench of this Court had passed the following order on 21.07.1987 in C.M. No. 541 of 1987:- “Heard the counsel for the parties. Both, the petitioner and the respondents are directed not to alienate any portion of the disputed property, during the pendency of this appeal.” COCP No.623 of 1996 The petitioner has further alleged in the present contempt petition that the respondent has sold a part of the property to the third party vide sale deed dated 20.05.1993 and thus, the respondent had violated the orders of this Court and committed the contempt of this Court. Respondent has stated in her reply that interim order was never served to her, therefore, respondent was not aware about any interim order, thus, there is no question of violation of order. No material is placed on the record to prove that interim order was ever served on the respondent before the execution of the sale deed. Until and unless, order of stay is communicated to the respondent, respondent cannot be held guilty for non-compliance of the order. Dismissed. July 19, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2