IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21368 of 2009 JALIL ANSARI @ JALIL MIAN son of Sadique Ansari Resident of village Hirapakar, Nayatola, P.S. Bettiah (M), Manuapool, District-West Champaran. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 31/8/2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. If husband, the son of the petitioner was to pursue his career a in a foreign country, he could not have made his in-laws liable to pay the cost of his such ambition. In view of statement of the witnesses pointing out direct accusation against the petitioner of demanding money for sending his son, husband of the deceased, abroad there would be absolutely no justification for this Court to follow an order of granting bail passed in the case of Firoj Ansari, younger brother of husband of the deceased. There is a clear distinction in both the cases. Consequently, prayer for bail of the petitioner, father-in-law, is rejected for the present. In view of the fact that both son and the father, the two main heroes of this case are already in custody, this Court would direct the court below to ensure that the trial is taken up on expeditious basis for its being concluded within a period of one year from today. In the event, such trial is not concluded the petitioner will have liberty to first move the trial court and the trial court will record reasons for not concluding the trial within the 2 aforementioned period and only thereafter the petitioner may move this Court. With the aforementioned directions/observations this application is dismissed. Abhay Kumar (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)