IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 90 of 1998 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE H.R.SHELAT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- VAHARJI RAVAJI THAKORE Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: THROUGH JAIL for Petitioner MR UR BHATT ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE H.R.SHELAT Date of decision: 27/02/98 ORAL JUDGEMENT Rule. Mr.U.R.Bhatt,learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, waives the service of Rule. The parties do not press for a reasoned order. 2. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is ordered to be released on FURLOUGH leave for 14 days i.e. upto 14th March,1998, on usual terms and further on conditions that the petitioner shall; (a) make necessary declaration before the Jail Authority; (b) execute the bond of Rs.500/- or deposit in cash the sum of Rs. 500/- (Rupees: Five hundred only) before the Jail authority and furnish the surety of the like amount; (c) reside within the local limits of Village KEKA. (d) furnish the detailed address of his residence to the Jailor; (e) mark his presence every 3rd day between 9.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m. before the DEESA Police Station. (f) give name with full details of his relative, ready to be the surety; (g) state before the Jail authority about to and from journey expenses; and (h) provide other particulars as per the requirements of rules, if called upon to provide by Jail authority. 3. The Jail authority shall intimate the concerned authorities. In case of breach is committed, it will be open to the Jail authority to forfeit the amount of bond or the sum deposited. 4. Rule is made absolute accordingly. Direct service is permitted. Date: 27th February, 1998. (H.R.SHELAT,J.) (ccs)