IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1414 of 2008 HIRA LAL RAI & ORS Versus JAMUNA SINGH ----------- 2 1/9/2008 Heard counsel for the petitioners. In the opinion of this Court when the petitioners in its application filed on 14.2.2008 for adducing additional evidence in purported exercise of power under Order 41 Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure did not specifically mention about the documents, its relevance to the issue involved in the appeal, the petitioner could not have expected the court below to pass an order as to whether those document were effectively required for rendering judgment in the appeal. The court below has gone into the merits of the appeal and has held that the conditions applicable for admitting additional evidences were not at all applicable to the facts of this case. Such satisfaction of the court below as recorded in the impugned order ordinarily can not be interfered by this Court in exercise of its revisional power under Section-115 C.P.C. as they are neither perverse nor in excess of its jurisdiction. There being thus no jurisdictional error in the impugned order, this Court would not find any reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, this application being devoid of any merit is dismissed. ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J. ) Abhay Kumar