1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 232 OF 2005 Mehboob Sayyed Abdul Sayyed ..... Appellant. V/s State of Maharashtra ...... Respondent. ---- Ms. Vrishali Raje i/b Mr. Prakash Naik for the appellant. Mr P.A. Pole, APP for the State. ----- ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.225 OF 2005 Noor Alam Naimulla Khan ..... Appellant. V/s The State of Maharashtra ..... Respondent. ---- Ms. Vrishali Raje, advocate appointed as amicus curiae by the Court for the appellant. Mr P.A. Pole, APP for the State. ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. DATE: 1st October, 2008 2 P.C.: For the reasons separately recorded, the following order is passed:- O R D E R In the result, both the appeals are partly allowed. The conviction imposed by the Trial Court is confirmed. The sentence imposed by the Trial Court is modified to the sentence already undergone by both the appellants. Both the appellants have already undergone 4 years and two months of sentence. Both the appellants, therefore, be released forthwith on the sentence which they have already undergone, if not required in any other case. Both the appeals are accordingly disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (V.M. KANADE, J.)