HIGH COURTOF CHHATnSCiARH. BILJMSPUR S.B.: HOW'BLB SHRI JU8TICB SUKIL KOMAR 8IIIHA CONEMPT PETITIOM N0. 44/20(M PETITIOMBRS RE8POWDENT Khoobchand Manjlu S/o Shri Baldev Singh Manjhi, A®edabout 36 years, R/o ViUagc MucfaaUial Block Mainpur, Dlstrict Raipur Chhattisgarh. Mahavir CIiatoawarti, S/o Shri Manaram Chakrawarti, Aged about 24 years, R/o ViII^c Bazadi Block Mainpur, Tehsfl Ganya Baad, District Raipur, Clihattisgarh. Bharallal Bhaati, S/o Shri Lal Bhaati., /^ed about 26 yeara, R/o Gudvelty, Block Mampur, Tehsfl Gariya Band, District, Raipur, CUhattisgarh. VERSUS Nand Kuxnar, Seeretaiy Departincnt of Scbool Educatioa Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Ralpur Chhatdsgarh. COnmBMPT PBTmON inTOBRARTICLE 218 OF TSE CONSTITUTION OF 1SOS& Apnearance: Mr. Alok N^am, Advocate for the pctitioners. Mr. Alok Bakshi, Advocate for fhc respondent ORAL ORDER (12.07.2010) 8UIIXL KVMAR SlimA.J, Heard. The petitioners have filed fhas petition for iuitiation of proceeding ofcontenipt s^ainst the respondent for non-compliance <»BaaM?n»ETOno»wo.4*<a(Kw of fbe order dated 25th April, 2007 passcd by ttris Court jn W.P.(C). No. 2536/2007 (AnBexiuie-C-3). This Courtwhile disposing the said writ petition, passed fhe foUowing inrder on 25th AprO, 2007:- 'Jn view of the fact, the Secrefcay, Goverrmient, qf Chhattisgarh, Sdwol Education Depccrtment w directed to consider fhe letter dated 13.12.2006 (Annexwe-A-3) of Oue Chef Execulive Officer Jcmpad Panchayai, Blode Mcanpur, Distrid Raipur, and pass appropriafe wder in aocsordaHoe with law, immediateJy tirithin a period of three weeks fnxn. the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With fhe above observation, Ws petifion is dispased ef. No order as to oosts.' It appears that after passiag the said order, fhe saiae was comiaimicated to the respondent on 12.05.2007. Mr. Alok Bakshl, learaed coimsd appearing oa bchalfofthe respondent, subinits that after receipt of tfae representation aad fhe order, prompt response was given to the grieyances of the petitioners and smce the poUcy decision has to be taken, thcrefore, somc more .tune was consumed aad ultiiuatcfy affier due consideration of fhe cases of fhe petitioners, thc respondent has dccided the representatfon of fhe petitioners on 27.09.2007. A copy ofthe order has atso becn axinexed as AunexuBe-R-t. In view of fhe above, their appeaiS^8"to be substantial coinpliance ofthe order dated 25th April, 2007 and iu fhe facts and circ'umstances of fhe case, I do not decm it appropriate to proceed ftuther in fhe mattcr. Though, thcre is some delay in thedecision taken by the respondent but the same doesn't appear to bc ia wiUful dis-regard to fhe order passed by fhis Court. Inviewoffhe above.the petition stands finaUy; disposed of. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge