IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (Sl No. 690% OF 2011. PETITIONER : Ku. Chandramani Ukey, D/o. Shri Ladduram Ukey, aged about 42 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School Godhikala, Block ‘ Nawagarh, Bemetara Distt. ‘5 Q} ’ Durg (C.G.) 9?.ms6“wé\ “nu-0"N‘ 9/ V E R S U S RESPONDENTS :1. State of Chhattisgarh, /' Through : The Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) 2. District Education Officer, / / District Education Office Durg, District Durg (C. G.) 3. Additional District Education / Officer, Education District Bemetara, District Durg (C,G.) 4. Block Education Officer, /, Block Nawagarh, District Durg (C.G.) V @ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE \ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA WW,WI§,W mmwXgJmW/m} In 200 mwamgfgagu) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioneris entitled to benefit of two advance increments on account of she having passed B. Ed. examination hefore appointment at her own cost. It is submitted that the issue involved ‘n the present petition is no longer res lly decided by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Asha Sax vs. State of M.P. & Ors., 2009 (III) MPJR (SC) 59. It is further su tted that this Court has also taken a similar View in his order dated 06 02-2009 passed in W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. Learned counsel for the etitioner further draws attention of this Court to order dated 29-04-2010 assed in Writ Appeal No.124 of 2009, wherein relying upon the judgme t of the Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) and the 0rd r passed by this Court in another Writ Appeal No.87/2009, directions ha e been issued for consideration of the case for grant of two advance incr ments as per circular dated 21-09-1 974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification of the facts pleaded in the petition. Learned counsel for the r spondents submits that now the State Government had issued a circul r on 05-01-2011 and the case of the petitioner would be examined in the light of the decision of the State Government. integra and the same has been mm a e b i am an this; am Wm amid; .W. mmm was mm:W a‘ fsétW k afftmm SB : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohah Shrivastava, J. 30-09-201 1 Shri Mirza Hafeez Baig, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Praveen Das, Deputy Government Advocate for the State/respondents on advance copy. Heard. $% WMWW¢.~W~ r he ‘ p'e’titiéih’wt copy of this order. in view of the statement made of with a direction to the respondent claim of the petitpner for grant of ti VS M‘- ‘ t m Sd/-' Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge e above, this petition is tinally disposed authorities to consider and decide the ivo advance increments in view of the diaiso in view of c‘ cuiar, which has been issued by the ”State Governmerit on 05-01-2011, fter verification of the facts pleaded in ‘Aa period of thre months from the date of receipt of a j \ n xx-Hc—vs mm m 200 =m’umm awmmi$ mm(qsf§a§u) .,_ Wm f§éW mmafa-«m v—L $Wm