IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 12.11.2010 C.R.No.7394 of 2010 (O&M) Angrej Kaur and others ...Petitioners Versus Ranjit Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. S.K.Arora, Advocate, for the petitioners. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) The judgment-debtors are in revision aggrieved against an order passed by the learned Executing Court on 10.08.2010, whereby an objection that the warrants of possession in respect of house constructed over 39 Kanals 13 Marlas of land cannot be issued in execution of a decree for possession dated 05.10.2005. The plaintiffs-respondents filed a suit for possession of agricultural land measuring 39 Kanals 13 Marlas. The said suit was decreed on 05.10.2005. It was not the stand of the defendants that any construction has been raised by the defendants at their own costs and that the plaintiffs are not entitled to possession of any portion of land. Once the decree for possession has been granted in respect of land measuring 39 Kanals 13 Marlas, therefore, any construction on the aforesaid land is also part of the decree for possession. The decree-holders are entitled to possession of the entire land as the construction, if any, raised is part of the land. In view thereof, I do not find any patent illegality or irregularity in the order passed by the learned Executing Court, which may warrant any interference in exercise of the revisional jurisdiction of this Court. Dismissed. 12.11.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE