1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUO MOTU WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO.92 OF 2007 Doroty Furtado ..Petitioner V/s. The Municipal Corporation of Greater ..Respondents Mumbai & ors Ms.Rohini M. Dandekar, Advocate, for petitioner Ms.P.A.Purandare, Advocate, for respondent No.1 Mr.Jagdish G. Aradwad, Advocate, for respondent No.2 CORAM : J.N.PATEL & K.U.CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATE : 16TH JULY, 2008 P.C. . Heard. 2. A letter written by the petitioner to the Hon'ble the Chief Justice was treated as Public Interest Litigation. 3. It has been brought to our notice that an identical petition came to be filed by Mr.Sanjay G.Agaldhare, Corporator of Ward. This Court had disposed of that PIL NO.12 of 2006 dated 17th 2 January, 2007. The said order dismissing PIL was challenged by Mr.Sanjay V. Agaldare, one of the petitioners before the Hon'ble Supreme Court by filing Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.12158 of 2007. We are informed by the learned counsel for respondent No.2 that the said SLP has been dismissed by the Supreme Court on 14th July, 2008. Therefore, it will not be proper on the part of this Court to entertain another petition on the said subject. We, therefore, dismiss this petition with caution that the petitioner shall not agitate the issue otherwise this Court would be constrained to impose costs on the petitioner for abusing the process of Court. (J.N.PATEL, J.) (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.)