Cr.MP(M) No. 933 of 2010 25.08.2010 Present: Mr. T.S. Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Ruma Kaushik, Addl. Advocate General for the respondent. This bail application is disposed of at this stage without entering into the merits as well as submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. The facts as narrated and obtained from the record are deep telling. The petitioner was arrested on 15th December, 2008. Challan was filed in Court on 12.2.2009 and more than fifteen dates were fixed by the Court for framing of Charge. This delay is not explained and makes serious incursion in the right to life and liberty of the petitioner. This ground by itself may not be sufficient for grant of bail, but definitely points a finger of blame at the prosecution/Court. Why and for what reason this insensitive attitude had been adopted by the prosecution or by the Court is unexplained. The charge has been ultimately framed on 7th May, 2010. From 12th February, 2009 to 7th May, 2010, that is a period of more than one year and three months, no proceedings were taken. In these circumstances, a direction is issued to the trial Court to record evidence of the prosecution on the dates so fixed and to dispose of the case expeditiously thereafter, ensuring that no undue adjournments are granted for recording evidence on behalf of the prosecution. This direction has been issued in view of the fact that the petitioner is in custody for the last about two years. Application stands disposed of. A copy of this order be sent to the trial Court forthwith. August 25, 2010 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge