IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 19853 of 2005 Between: Mohd. Khaja Masnuddin, S/o. Late Khaja Moinuddin, R/o. H.No. 17-3-190/D/1, Talabkatta, Hafeeznagar, yakutpura, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Tghe District Collector, ( Joint Collector), Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division, R.R.District. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Moinabad Mandal, R.R.District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioner: None appeared Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition itself is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner feeling aggrieved by the inaction of respondent No.3 in implementing order, dated 31.10.2001 passed by respondent No.2 in File No.C/22/55/2000 by deleting the names of Sirajuddin, Zameeruddin and Qamruddin and restoring the name of original pattadar in respect of agricultural land in Survey Nos.226/6, 231/9 and 267 from 1988-89 onwards. The petitioner also sought for a consequential direction to issue pattadar passbooks and title deeds. At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue furnished a copy of brief note signed by the Tahsildar, Moinabad Mandal along with the copies of pahanies from the year 1988-89 up to the years 2002- 2003. It is mentioned in the said note that order, dated 31.10.2001 in respect of which the petitioner sought for implementation, was implemented by the Tahsildar vide proceedings No.B/466/2004, dated 03.09.2005 by correcting entries from 1988-89 up to the current year. In view of the above mentioned fact that the order has already been implemented, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.25240 of 2005 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 27th June, 2008. kvni