1 CRA-84-11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 84 OF 2011 Shri Clifford Paul D'Sa .. Applicant (Orig. accused) vs. Shri Nelson A. D'Souza & Anr. .. Respondents (No.1 - complainant) Mr. Archit Sakhalkar, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr.Murtza Najmi, Advocate for the respondent No.1. Ms. U.V.Kejriwal, APP, for the respondent No.2 - State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 18th March, 2011. P.C. 1. The Revision is filed against the conviction and sentence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The parties have compounded the case as per the application marked "X" which is signed by the respondent No. 1/complainant, who is present before the Court and his Advocate as well as by the Advocate for the applicant/accused. The accused is in jail. The respondent No.1 has also filed an affidavit that he has received amount of Rs.4,90,000/- and the amount of Rs.20,000/- is still lying with the trial Court and he has already obtained orders for withdrawal of the same. In view of this, the parties are allowed to compound. 2 CRA-84-11.sxw 2. In the result, the order of conviction and sentence by the learned Magistrate, 10th Court, Andheri, Mumbai in C.C. No.330/SS/2008 are hereby set aside. The applicant be set at liberty forthwith, if not required in any other case. 3. As the Revision Application is disposed of, Application No.62 of 2011 for suspension of sentence and the Application No.63/2011 for bail do not survive and stand disposed of. 4. Parties to act on an authenticated copy of this Order. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)