IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.562 of 2007 PALLAVI BHARTI @ RINKI @ SHAHINA PERVEEN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 02.9.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the informant. The petitioner has prayed for quashing the FIR and issuance of warrant in connection with Jokihat PS case no. 30 of 2007 lodged for offences under sections 363,364,366A/34 I.P.C. on the allegation of kidnapping of petitioner by accused persons named in the FIR. Petitioner has further prayed for providing protection to her and all her in-laws. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the accused persons had not kidnapped the petitioner rather she, aged 24 years, at her own sweet will elopped with accused Md Rahbar Alam S/o Sh. Mohd Hashim and married him without any pressure or coercion from any side. It is submitted by the State counsel that the Superintendent of police, Araria has categorically stated in the counter affidavit that during investigation police found the date of birth of the petitioner to be 1.9.1992, a minor from school records and her name in the voter list had wrongly been inserted showing her to be a major which has been later on rectified. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is not inclined to allow the prayers made in the writ petition, accordingly, they are refused. Petitioner is at liberty to raise his grievances before the Investigating agency or the court dealing with the matter. Writ petition stands disposed of. Shashi. (S.P.Singh,J).