IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32103 of 2009 Sushil Kumar @ Sushil Prasad, Son of Sri Suresh Prasad, resident of village- Har Prasad Bigha, P.S.-Parwalpur, District-Nalanda. …….Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …….Opp. party. ----------- 2/ 30.10.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is the elder brother of husband of informant. The informant has instituted a case in connection with Ekangar Sarai (Parwalpur) P.S. Case No. 309/1999 for the offence under Sections 498 (A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he did not move for anticipatory bail earlier as the dispute in between the informant and her husband has been settled. Their matrimonial relationship has restored and they are living together. It is submitted that for this reason he was under the impression that there was no reason for which he has to take anticipatory bail, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of above named petitioner is rejected, with this observation that in the case petitioner surrenders before the court below his regular bail application should be considered immediately and order be passed taking consideration of these facts. Sanjeet/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)