<iaaa t—& sw aai^ -> ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BU.ASPUR ICHHATTISGARHl W.P.No.S^h, 1/2003 'i A PETITIONERS . ,.^j^""" ,'»?,VT~' ^•^"".,.. ..•••" ^'^ RESPONDENTS \" :1 :1) 2) 3) 4) 5) JAGDISH PRASAD, S/o Sitaram Lodhi, Aged about 42 years, TUMNATH S/o Sitaram Lodhi, Aged about 45 years, Both R/o Vill. Petulkapa, PS. Patharia, Tahsil Mungeli, Dist. Bilaspur (CG) Vs STATE OF C.G. Through Secretary, Home, DK Bhavan, Raipur. SUPDT. OF POLICE, Dist. Bilaspur (CG). Shri H.R. MANHAR, ADDL. SUPDT. OF POLICE(RURAL) Dist. Bilaspur (CG). Shri RAKESH KHAKHA, S.D.O. (POLICE), Mungeli, Dist. Bilaspur. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PS. Patharia, Dist. Bilaspur. ../r PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF'CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRST yi HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISQARH AT BILASPUR ^\ WRST PETITaON N0.1311 OF 2003 Petstioners Jagdish Prasad & Another Versus ashok Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETiTION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTiTUTiON OF SNDIA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihofri, J.) Present:- Shri K.K.Dewangan, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDERCORAU (Passed on 22nd day of July, 2010) 1. By this petition, the petitioners seeks to quash the prosecution of the petitioners. The petition was fiied on 19/4^2003. It is not clear that whether the prosecution has been completeor still at the stage of Investigation. In aii probabilities, since the case was registered on 11/4/2002 after investigation, even the case must have come to its uitimate conclusion and as such it appears that the petition has bscom^. infructuous. if the grievance of the petltioner still survives, the petitloner may take recourse to the appropriate forum under the provisions of Saw. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with the aforestated liberty. i Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge