1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITON No. 5501 of 2011 Sandeep Ashok Modi Vs. Parmanand D.Jain Dharmashala Trust. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. N.D. Khamborkar, Adv. for the Petitioner. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK J. DATE : 18 th November, 2011. By this petition, the petitioner impugns the order passed by the trial court on 25.08.2011 rejecting an application filed by the petitioner for amendment of the written statement. The petitioner is the original defendant. The petitioner desired to amend the written statement with a view to point out that the cheque which he had drawn on I N G VYASYA bank was wrongly dishonoured though there were sufficient fund in the account of the petitioner. The trial court rightly held that it was not necessary to allow the amendment application as the cheque was not honoured in view of the fact that the petitioner's signature was incomplete-illegible as per the bank memo issued on 15.4.2010. Moreover, the plaintiff-respondent had admitted about the receipt of the amount mentioned in the cheque from the petitioner, thereafter. In this background, the writ petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE Hirekhan.