IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40896 of 2008 Md. Suleman Ansari @ Suleman Mian, son of Rasul Mian, village Bhopatpur Brit Tola, PS Kotwa, Dist. East Champaran – Petitioner. Versus State Of Bihar ----------- 2 28.7.2011 HeardMr. D.K.Tandon, counsel for the petitioner and Mr.A.K. Srivastava, A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by order, dated 22.7.2008 passed in S.T. No. 699/2007 by the Additional Sessions Judge, FTC IV, Motihari by which the court has rejected the ;application and found that prima facie petitioner is guilty of the offences under sections 489A, 489C and420 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no material to prove the fact that the petitioner was involved in counterfeiting currency notes and, therefore, these sections will definitely not be application as far as the petitioner is concerned. For the purpose of counterfeiting currency notes the court will have to come to the conclusion that the petitioner was actually involved in either manufacture, production or printing the notes. These aspects of the matter will have to be kept in mind by the trial court while considering the evidence that comes on record. This application is, thus, disposed of with the aforesaid observation. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)