li- \'-... '^ -f. t-,- ;it /V '-^. :!1!'E'tp°-'—~<1' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGASH AT BILASPUR Writ Petltion No?F7 6^/2004 PETITIONER REBPONDENTS ^ ^f. .^/^r \y^AV A^ / 'Narendra Kumar, 8/ o Shri Hemraj Bhai Taiik, aged about 42 years, Tnnk Ph.oto Fraiaing, Pafadeeh Chowk, E/o 'Vlkaapur Road, Raipur(C.G.). Veraua- : 1. ^State ofehliattiagarh, Tlu'oughfh^Seca'Btary, BepartmentofLocalSelf, , D.K.S. Bhawan, Maiitralaya, Raipur (0.0.). -State of Chhattiagarta., Tllrough th.e Secretary, Departtnent of Revenue, D.K.S. Bh&wan, Mantralaya, Raipur(C.Q.) 3. Muiricipal Corporatitfn, Raipur, Thrugh the Chief Mturictpfll Of&cer, Ralpur (C.G.) 4, Cottector, District - Raipur (C.G.) 5. Tahaildar, RaipurjC.G.) ^^&r Shri Prabhulal Jefhwa, S/o Late Shri Devranyi Jethwa, Aged. about 58 years, R/oJefhwaBada, Fafadeeh, Raipur (C.G.). J^ PETITION ARTIGLE CONSTITUTION ISSUANCE CERTIOKARI. MANDAMUS OR ANy OTHER WRIT OR DIRKITION TO DO JUSTICE INTHE MATTER. 'li' iniri HIGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARHATBILASPUR WRITRETIflON N0.4766 of 2004 Petitioner Narendra Kuhnar Versus 3»., ^. y' Respondehts StateofChhattisgaFh&Others WRIT RETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon'ble Mr.Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri Ajay Mishra, Advocate for.the petitioneF. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri M.B. Agrawal, Sr. Advacate with IVI&. Itu Rani Das, AdydcatefortherespondentNo.S. . . ORDER(ORAL.) (Passed on 20th day of July, 2010) 1. By this petition.the petitionerseeks a directiontotMe respondents not to-demdlish the premises of t|i& petitioner and further permitting the petitioner to continue inthe premises.in question. 2. According toShri Mishra, learned counsel appearing forthe petitioner, the owner of the premises in dispute was late Smt. Jayaben Jethwa, widow of Late Devramji Jethwa; The petitioner was indycted as tenant in the premises ih question. During pendency of this petition, the premises in question has already been demQlisbed. 3. Shri Agrawal, learned seniorGOunsel appearing for the respondent Corporation submits that this petition is even otherwise not maintainable on the ground tliat the petitionerwas claiming rellef pn the basis ofbeing tenant. 4. Be that as it rnay, since the premises in quesfion has already been demQlished and there js po further prayer for Gompensation on account cifdennolitiQn of the'premises in question, it is not necessary to go into the merits of the case at present^ grant of any 2 . : .' : . ! .' : Mowever, liberty is reserved to tMe petitioner to make an applicatiQn before the authorities Glaiming all the reliefs whatever he may be entitledto, urider the provisions of law. If a representation is made the sameshall be considered and decided in accordance with law by the respondent CorpGration and appropnate order shajl be passed within a period of four week from the date of receipt- of the representafion, if any, 5. Accordingly, the writ petitiQn stands disposed Sd/- satish^Agnihotri Judge Arun ..)11 >