T~ ^. ,,^,-gs%^, ^.- '^^ ^^. ^y^-^ ff ©.•ffa^'Si's 8 8 ''SSS.-^vs '%. ,^;T '^3^-s^^ an^r ^i ft-fi* 'cWT Sf^t sb*ii^) WW(T a»*ii*»> ~3^''^l^lcl^,? i9Tll4('IR, [qf1l<iy ^.^p^)....^^........... sn^r'f^; (i°il3i<i4) TOiiw^ifcrsn^i i-'ElillONjLR -Versit RESPQNDENTS 2. 3. 29-1- Shri Saurabh Sharma, counse Shri ArunSao, Govt. Advocate Shri Ghanshyam Patel, couns< '*i<ili'i<i)"< wi?if ^' fezt <F'|«(K iTsfflCTan^t Harish Chandra Sahare, S/o Shri Chango Sahare, aged about 58 years, Assistant Revenue Inspector, Municipal Councii, Dongargarh, Resident of Danteshwari Para, 'vVard No.2, Dongargarh, Tshsil Dongargarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon, s- State of Chhattisgarh, ttrough the Secretary, Dspartment of Environment and Urban Administration, D.K.S. Bhawan, Municipal Councii, Dongargarh, Through Chief Municipal Officer, Municipa! Counei) Dongargarh, Tehsi! Dongargarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. Shri Sunil Kumar Namdeo, Assistant Revenue Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Chhui Khadan, Teteii Khairagarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon, (Chhattjsgiarh) Municipal Corporation, Korba, Through Gommissioner, Municipal Corporation, Korba, Chhattisgarh. SinaleBench: Hon'bl4 Shri Dhirendra Mishra. J. for the petitioner. for the StateA'espondent No. i for respondent No-2. gHRBl.'r^TSS'naiKR-iK'ira'—FS/95—11/2008—),00,000. :-<i,:;.2:^.^' '-''•- •esEssy:'--. y I '^"'11 "XI-HC—78 an^! %t fipN? 'a^T-sn^fT st>^ff* ••-\. Barve 1f ^sr T<ii<<ici<f, afllyls, Ricii+iy NI*ICT! <n^i«n •vi.zoo sn^T'q^T C^p^s?) ^•WlW^fl 3TT^?T -cX- vl'ho Snrt Sl.lde6p Agrawal vj'i respondent No.4. Heard. This petltion is directed P/3) whereby the petitloner, Dongargarh; h^ beentransfen-e|d Shri Sao, learned Govt. the transfer oixler of Annexure not be given effect to due to ir)t Court. !n these circumstances, petitioner has become redundarjt they have no objection if the peti| appropriate orders in the matter of administrative exigency. !n view of the above instant petition is allowed and ij relates to the petitioner, is set aj pass appropriate order in the ev^i transfer/posting ofthe pefitioner. In view ofthis order, a!i th< ibl;<lf?f4ttf 'RT'Tcff ^^^ ^t^R. ^aif^Tsn^r nn snn Anumen snrivasteva, counsel ft ^gainst the order dated 9-8-2007 (Annexur was working in the Munteipal Counci to Municipal CouncH, Korba. ^(dvocate, appearing for the State submits ttis so far as it relateste the petitioner, couli irjterim order dated 5-10-2007 passed by thii the transfer order so fer as it retetes to th< idarjt and meaningless with the lapse of ttme an< pon is allowed wnth libertyto the State to pass 4>ftransfer/postingofthe petttioner in the sven' subtnisston of learned coUnsel for the State, the ijnpugned order of Annexure P-3 so far as i) a^ide. However, the State shall be at Ifberty to /^nt of administrative eXigency in the matter of pendlng applicadons stand disposed of.^- sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge •4-