IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 13663 of 2009 Between: S.Ramchandra Reddy, S/o S.Venku Reddy, R/o. 75 TUDA Apartments, Near L.I.C. Ofice, Tirupati, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Office of the Commissioenr of Income Tax, Rep by its Commissioner , Tirupati, Chittoor District. 2 The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2 (2), Tirupati, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ or Order more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents in giving information as sought by the petitioner, as arbitrary, illegal, contrary to sections 5, 6 and 7 of the Rights to Information Act 2005 and consequently direct the respondents to provide the information to the petitioner and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.R.CHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.B.NARASIMHA SARMA The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.No. 13663 of 2009 21-07-2009 Oral Order: Denial of information by the respondents despite the application dated 23-09-2008 made for certain information, is the complaint in this writ petition. It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that after the institution of the writ petition, the respondents had made available to the petitioner the information earlier sought for and that in the circumstances, the petitioner does not wish to pursue the writ petition. Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed as ‘infructuous’. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated: 21-07-2009 Pvks