T^ ^•? IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^o WRIT PETITION f227) N0. ^3^ OF 2011 PETITIONER; APPELANT N0-1 "Gokul Ram, S/o Firturam Kanwar, Caste Kanwar (Scheduled Tribe), Aged about 40 years, R/o Charpara Deragarh, Tahsil Sakti, Distt.Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: \^M.. ^/^w /l,^(r;.^V •^^w ^y '? '%• 1. Janki Bai, D/o Dhariram Gond, W/o Premsingh Gond, Aged about 46 years, R/o Garhgorhi, Tahsil Sakti, Distt.Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 2. ^L^khan Lal, S/o Beniram, Caste Rathore, Aged about 49 years, R/o Deragarh, Tahsil Sakti, Distt.Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) 3. ^State of Chhattisgarh, Through the District Magistrate, Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Divisiona! Officer, Sakti, Distt.Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 5. ^-Additionai Collector, Janjgir-Champa /' (C.G.) ^..^Commissionner, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.) 4,/"Sub •i- '(1. :^,, t > ' 7. Board of Revenue, Chhattisgai Bilaspur (C.G.) APPELANT N0-2 8. Sukhwara Bai, Widow of Firturam Kanwar, Aged about 40 years, Caste Kanwar (Scheduled Tribe), R/o Charpara Deragarh, Tahsil Sakti, Distt.Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT/WRITS. DIRECTIONS RTC., IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI AND/OR ANY OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OF LIKE NATURE The_@etitLojiers^_ahQvej"iamfid—mosttiixmJaL _ajad ^.^^^^~t.^"u—t. K, p p ^ t XI-HC—78 ITRC'IT th*llt»> ^"^ •^ii^iwi, ©•cilyie,fqoiyy ^ ^e. ^^)^^^°, ?o/^o/; 20'0 sn^?! s?»n (•i,<:tt^«i<i«t) an^T w ft-i1<* ^n a-?T^?T ^*n^i ?«iits<^ffen sn^f qi)^^4ll tffH^f ^ fe(Sl <faq+$R ^?3tiOTan^?f (SB : "on'bie Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.i] 11.10.201-! Mr.Vivek Rathore, counsei fof Mr.D.N.Prajapaii, counsei for| Ms Sangeeta Mishra, Panei None present for respondent^ P.F. has not been paid wiihin) Learned counsel for the peti( theP.F.on 21.9.2011. tt appeara from ihe previous ): in fime even after condoning the d^ the Registp/. Accordingiy, further opportunfty psyment of cost of Rs.1000/- to r^s notice be issued to respondent No.j Notice be made returnab!e within be dssmissed wiihoui reference to t!t the petitioner. |respondent No.1. Ijawyer for respondents No.3 tp 6. No.2, 7 and 8. Itime. (ioner submits that hs has aiready paid t>rder sheets that P.F. has not bsen paid flay in P.F. and providing opportunity by is granted to the petittoner subject to r^spondent No.1 within seven days and 1. Fresh P.F. be paid within seven days. weeks, TaiBng which the petiiion shal! te Court. fdur Sd/- T.P.Sharma judge SST •*ii4iici<4, ®ii1'M<i<o, fsi<niy^< _.....:^c^.....^^ 3H^I'tR9? ('13ci^S1') an^r ^r R-ii'* g<1IW^T9r1W TOnwHteran^r 4)T'4l<'Tifl'1 'RH^ff ^f f '-'^ ^^^ ^ affim w ^i 02/11/2011 This case is treated as dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory Court's order dated 11.10.2011 (for details note sheet part may kindly be seen). Counsel accordingly. S.O.fWrt be informed ^- - Sd/- A.R