1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO.96 OF 2010 _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office } Memoranda of Coram, } Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's } orders or directions } and Registrar's orders } ___________________________}___________________________________ Mr.V. D. Rakh, AGP for appellant. ........ [CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. ] DATE : 21st January, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard. The State feels aggrieved by the enhancement of Rs.21,501/- as additional compensation by the learned Reference Judge at Ahmednagar dated 27th November, 1998. 2. Having gone through the order under challenge I find that the learned Reference Judge has taken into consideration the judgment in L.A.R. No.96/1987 in which he has held market price/value of Jirayat land and of seasonally irrigated land, then prevailed at the time of notification made under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act should have been Rs.18,000/- per hector 2 and Rs.27,000/- per hector respectively. 3. These aspects quoted by the learned Judge, in the fact situation can not be said to be erroneous or contrary to the record. The enhancement is adequate and not excessive. No interference is called, First appeal dismissed without notice to the respondents. Necessary court fees be refunded as per Rule. [ K.U.CHANDIWAL ] JUDGE gas/fa96.10