|j^i^S»»B ^ -7- I ^zrZ- (D PETITIONER LN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.[S]No. '7 31 /2010 Anil Kumar Trivedi S/o Late P.D. Trivedi , aged about 50 yrs, R/o Through theShushil Kumar Hajari (Advocate), Advocate Chembers , Tahsil Office, Nehru Chowk Bilaspur Chhattigarh VERSUS (_Qf\^^^}^\^ ^-^^ 1_ Through the Chairman >©eattedia-fcimited, Coal Bhawan 10, Netaji Subhash Road, Kolkata West Bengal RESPONDENTS .^ ^^ ey ^ 1^ ^\7 ^w/. ^ / h?;A/ 2. South Eastem Coal field Itd through the Chief Managing Direcfor Seepat Road, Bilaspur [ C.G.] 3. i 4. The Director Personal , S.E.C.Ltd. Seepat Road, Bilaspur [C.G.] The General Manager , S.E.C.Ltd. Chhote Atarmuda , Raigarh Area Raigarh [C.G.] 5. The Dy. General Manager , S.E.C.Ud, Chhote Atarmuda , Raigarh Area Raigarh [C.G.] t! 6. The Deputy Chief Mining Engineer (C.M.E.) S.E.C.L. Chhote Atarmuda Raigarh, Area Raigarh (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^^^^:^^ /^:1^ ""^ ^ ^. • >.^ f I:"Y ^ 1 "-<i^ 1 ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Sl N0. 731 of2010 ^ Petitioner Respondent Versus Anil Kumar Trivedi Coal India Ltd. & others. Arun WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri H.M. Solapurkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.S. Koshy, Panel Lawyerforthe respondents. ORDER (ORALl (Passed on 21st day ofApril, 2010) Heard. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that clause 30 of the standing order provides for disposal of appeal within a period of 45 days of receipt of the representation. Despite there being a statutory provision, the appellate authority has not done anything in appeal filed by the petitioner on 19.12.2009. 2. Shri Koshy, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that on account of certain difficulties, the appeal could not be considered within the prescribed time, however the same shall be considered and disposed of at the earliest within a period of four weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3. In view of the foregoing, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication at this stage. 4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agmhotri Judge