IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 25TH MAY 2010 / 4TH JYAISHTA 1932 WP(C).No. 15970 of 2010(U) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ RAPPAI K.O, S/O.OUSEPH, KALLARAIKKAL HOUSE, MISSION QUARTERS, MUDOOPALAM, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.JIJO PAUL RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KUZHALMANDAM. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, ALATHOOR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.N.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No. 15970 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 25th day of May, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P4 order, whereby the 1st respondent has returned the application submitted by the petitioner for issue of a possession certificate in respect of his property, on the ground that the property in question has been attached by the Thrissur Sub court-II in O.S. No.562/2010. But the petitioner now submits that the petitioner is yet to get transfer of registry in favour of the petitioner in respect of the property in question. Petitioner has submitted Ext.P5 application before the 2nd respondent for that purpose. Petitioner now confines his relief for a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 as expeditiously as possible. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE shg/