IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6484 of 2011 NAND KUMAR PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02/ 23.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. This criminal miscellaneous case has been preferred for cancellation of bail granted by this court vide order dated 1.12.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 29661/2010 to opposite party nos. 2 to 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner, who happens to be informant of Barh P.S. Case no. 335/2009, submits that after getting bail, opposite party nos. 2 to 5 are giving threat not only to the informant of the above stated Barh P.S. Case no.335/2009 but also witnesses of the aforesaid case. It is pointed out by him that the informant has already given written petition to Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna as well as to the concerned court i.e. Addl. Sessions Judge III, Barh. It would appear from perusal of the order dated 1.12.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 29661/2010 that opposite party nos. 2 to 5 were granted privilege of bail by this court on the ground that having similar fact, one co-accused AjayYadav @ Bhulla had already been released on bail. Moreover, this criminal miscellaneous case stands disposed of with direction to Addl. Sessions Judge III, Barh to enquire into the petition filed on behalf of the informant of the case before his court and, if any, substance is found by him in the petition filed by the informant before his court, the learned Addl. Sessions Judge III, Barh shall take step in accordance with law without keeping in mind that opposite party nos. 2 to 5 have been granted privilege of bail by this court. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)