IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.3585 of 2010 Date of Decision : 25.5.2010 Mithlesh & another ....Petitioners Versus Hans Raj and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr. J.S.Hooda, Advocate for the petitioners. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. This petition can be disposed of at this stage without issuance of notice of motion to the other side as resorting to this process is likely to delay the proceedings further. The petitioners were granted as many as six opportunities to deposit the publication charges in order to carry out the service of respondent No.2 in the petition. The petitioners failed to do so. Now they pray for one opportunity to do the needful. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petition is arising out of motor accident claim case and petitioner No.1 being a widow could not deposit the publication charges on account of paucity of funds. He further states that now the needful shall be done. Having regard to the fact that the proceedings are C.R.No.3585 of 2010 -2- emanating from a motor accident claim case and prima facie it has been shown that petitioner No.1 is a widow and taking purely a lenient view of the whole situation and in order to ensure substantial justice, I deem it appropriate to set aside the impugned order and direct that the petitioners shall be granted one opportunity to deposit the publication charges so as to carry out the service of respondent No.2 in the petition. The petitioners shall deposit the said charges within a period of three weeks from today positively. It is made clear that no further indulgence shall be granted to the petitioners in the event of failure to do so. Petition stands disposed of. 25.5.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss