:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.711 OF 200 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.711 OF 200 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.711 OF 2008 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1245 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1245 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1245 OF 2007 Hasin Abdul Hamid Shaikh ...Applicant. v. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. Mr.Shaikh Mohammed Imran i/by Khan Abdul Wahab , advs. for the Applicant. Mr.Y.M.Nakhawa, APP for the Respondent/State. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: R.V.More,J. R.V.More,J. R.V.More,J. DATE: 21st January, 2009. DATE: 21st January, 2009. DATE: 21st January, 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The application is taken out for bail by the original accused no.1. The applicant/accused alongwith other three accused are convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 307 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 4 years. The applicant and other accused attacked P.W.1 with sword and gupti. The sword is recovered. Medical evidence corroborates the evidence of P.W.1. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for bail on merits, at this stage. 2. The learned counsel for the applicant/accused however, submits that the applicant/accused is in custody since last 21 months. In that view of the :2: matter, the applicant/accused deserves to be granted liberty to file a fresh application after undergoing half of the period of sentence. I, therefore, dispose off the application by passing the following order: i. Application is rejected. ii. However, liberty is granted to the applicant to apply afresh after six moths. (R.V.MORE, J.) (R.V.MORE, J.) (R.V.MORE, J.)