IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3875 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: February 04, 2011 Haryana Urban Development Authority .. Petitioner Vs. Vajinder Kumar and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. D.V. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Harit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Malhotra, Addl. A.G. Haryana. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Parwinder Singh, Advocate for private respondents. A.N. Jindal, J Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the instant petition has become infructuous as half of the amount of compensation, as awarded by the court below, has been paid to the respondents and the payment of the remaining half amount has been stayed by this Court in a Regular First Appeal. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is dismissed being infructuous. February 04, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge