jHlGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR N WRIT PETITION N0. 4296 of 1998 PETIIIQNER : MEHTAR‘ Alias Digambarlal, Son of Bholuram Mehra, Resident of Lalpu'r, P.H. No. 95, Tehsil and District Raipur, M.P. ‘ VERSUS ‘ . Hawaliram‘ son of Bhaiya Singh Punjabi, resident of Chhaporaw RH. 96, Tellsil and District Raipur, M.P. 2. Sub Divisicnal OEicer, Raipur, M.P. 3 Additional Coilector, Raipur, M.P. Ram Kama: son of Bholuram, resident of Lalpur, RH. No. r95, Tehsil and District Raipur, M.Pf . Mehtaru son of Bholuramtresident of Lalpur RH. No. 95, Tehsil and District Raipur, M.P. ‘ Smt. Kumaribai, aged 30 years, widow of Shatrughan, Raju (Minor) aged 5 year$ Son of Shatrughan. Indu (Minor) aged 3 yearsvdaughter of Shatrughan. No. 7 and 8 minors through guardian mother Kuinari v bai widow of Shatru‘ghan, resident of Lalpur, Tehsil and District Raipur, M.P. ' 9. Smt. Ganga Bai, widow of Bholuram, resident of Chhapora, Tehsil and District Raipur, M.P. 10. Smt. Suraj Bai (Daughter ofBholu)vwife of Jai Singh. 11. Sim. Chandra Bai (daughter of Bhoiu) wife ofJaipal. Nos. 10 and 11 residents of Lalpur. Tehsil and District Raipur, M.P. ‘ ' PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA / SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihot'ijLJ. A i J Present: None for the petitioner. V g 7 Shri Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate for the respondent No. 1. i 1 RESPONDENTS (I! °°J5\>.. ORDER (Passed on 8m day of August, 2007) The matter is called for hearing twice. On both occasions, none appeals nor any representation is made on behalfofthe petitioner. The petitioner may not .be interested in the matter. In view ofthe above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. l . E 3. Registry is directed'to send a certified copy of this order to the. etitioner forthwith. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri K l Judge L\ J \ , p