^ O) IN THE HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No,.3^- of2005 PETITIQNER: Kashi Ram Sahu Aged about 57 years. S/0 Shri Latel Sahu Village & Post- Arjuni, Baloda Bazar Distt. Raipur. (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 4 .-.^^... •f^ l.State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Water Resources Department Secretariat, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Sub-Divisional Officer Water Resources Department Sub-Division No^t, Baloda Bazar Distt. Raipur. (C:G.) €••••" WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI ETC OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. WN"W W^l'<^ T^ '^T^M"T, ^twi^, t^rRiy .^B.^.^^...WI 200 ^II^T.^T^W ^^r^i^i'^N'w ^..,., G... (^y^) 'i^W^^^?^? 31/01/200S Shri SunilOttwaai, couj Shri Akhil Agrawal, P.L.| Heard on LA.No. 225/^ ^wiw^i "wi^ff ^ fe%t'^^K ^T^tfaH^STt^T ' DLsel for the petitioner, for,the State. !005 for urgent hearing. It is allowed. The petitk>ner by the |nstaat petitton has challenged tiie order of Aniiexure P-1 by ich fhe petitioner was reiaoved froin J05/2002 on the ground that fhe petitbner had already attaia^d th^ age of superaiinuation Le. 55 service with effect froia 03 years, Learaed counsel for tl^e petitioner subndts that the State had subsequentiy taken fh-e <|lecision dated 16/08/2004 whereby the age of superaanuation ra been enhanced to 60 years. Annexure P-6. Leamed coun^ P^e Water Resources Departnient has |The ^bove order has been filed as tel for fhe ipetitiDner further subiaits that siinilarly sitaated gaag n^en were directed by th.is Court to be reinstated aiid passed suitablje order ia accordaace with. tlie order dated 16/08/2004 in their ca^es also. Leanied counsel for petitioner has n.ot attained fh| Annexure P-6 even thLen fljie petitioner has been retii'ed ou 03/05/2002. Leamed couusel for fh.^ I have heai'd leained coi| fhe petitioner subiaits fhat tiie e age of 60 yeai's as per poUcy vide respondents has not disputed tliat tlie State Govemraent has eii^iaaced fhe age of superaiinuation to 60 years vide order Annexure P-6. uisel for the parties. Gi; PRJ—FS/350—12/2000—50,000. .4- ^ ^l^l^T^N' ^^II^Ii^if'^Rte' •-'^-- $^f ^m^iT^^i^ ~3~5cr ^rai^^ ^WT^, fsr^irey —........W'.£.-..ci^....<?iM.k.c^—.«-.- ^^.......^•..i.....:.i.MA....^<a.j.^......^200 -^?l^^ (^t^^.) I^IW ^ft^ ^^ —2-- ^Rfep^'T "W^ ^f ^fe^ <fa^l< '^^tRP?^!^! Leanied cozinsel por tlie petitioner submits fhat tf the petitioner is graated libert^ to niaJ^e represenfation to the respondents to consider hisj case for reio.stateinent as per new poMcy vide Annexure P-6 an(| on such representation beiag niade by fhe petitioner, the same period ia the ends ofjustice s|iatlbe served. Thus,. considermg fhe aiid furth.er consideriiig the has been enhaaced to 60 1149/2003 vide order dati respondents to reconsider thd s to be decided wifhin. a stipiilated [acts aiid circum.stan.ces of fhe case Fact that fhe age of superaanuation ^ears and tliis Court in. W.P, No. ;d 29/09/2004 had directed the cases of ah'eady retired gaag nien, I aoi of fhe opiaion that the eijids ofjustice would be served tf flie petitioner is given Hberty to jmake detailed representation before the respoiidents for reiastateijaent as per poUcy vide Annexure P-6 within. 10 days from today aijid fhe same shatl be decided by flie respondents wifh.ia a further Annexure P-6 aad ia the Ughi inW.P. No. 1149/2003. Wifh. this obser^ation, t| Consequentiy, I.A. No. perlod offour weeks from. the receipt of such representation in ^he Ught of change of policy vide oforder dated 29/09/2004 passed [ie petition is disposed of. 125/2005 stands disposec^of^ Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ^. •^ Gt. T'RJ—FS/350—12/2000—50,000.