IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 20819 of 2008 Between: A. Ravi Chandra, S/o. Satyanarayana, R/o. 9-73-1, Floor Mill Road, Kamal Vilas Centre, Vijayawada. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House Officer, Machavaram, Police Station, Vijayawada Town, Vijayawada. 2 A. Amitha, W/o. Ravi Chandra, R/o. D.No. 60-17-9, Opp : Dee Vee Apartments, New Navodaya Colony, Vijayawada. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction particularly Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent not to interfere with the day to day activities of the petitioner, at the behest of the second respondent without following due process of law in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.N.NARASIMHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P. No. 20819 of 2008 O R D E R: The complaint of the petitioner is that the 1st respondent is interfering into the day-to-day activities of the petitioner and thereby causing interference to his life and liberty. According to the petitioner, his wife – 2nd respondent filed a complaint before the police, which was registered as Cr.No.517 of 2008 under Section 498-A IPC on the file of Machavaram Police Station, Vijayawada. The petitioner and his parents were arrested and got released on bail. Even then, the 2nd respondent is not leaving them and making all sorts of efforts to disturb the family life of the petitioner and making all false complaints before the police and the police are calling the petitioner now and then without there being any crime registered in this regard except the one under Section 498-A IPC. In the facts and circumstances of the case, respondent No.1 is directed not to interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioner without there being any specific complaint registered against him. However, this will not preclude the police from calling the petitioner as and when required for the purpose of investigation of the crime registered under Section 498-A IPC. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with the above direction. C.V. RAMULU, J. Date: 17-11-2008. MVB.