IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH PETITIONER: •I RESPONDENTS: W.P. (C) No. 2261/2010 Smt. Ashabai Jain, W/o Tarachand Jain, aged 50 years, R/o 101, Maruti Enclave, Near AIMS Hospital; Tatibandh; Raipur (C.G. VERSUS Bank of Maharasthtra, through its Chairman- cum- Managing Director, Corporate Office, Lokmangal 1501, Shivaji Nagar, Pune - 411005 Branch Manager, Bank of Maharashtra, Shanishchari Bazar, Durg (C.G.) 491 001. «< M/s Kumat Automobiles 'Through its proprietor Subhash Chand Jain S/o Shri Hira Lal Jain Navkar Parisar G.E. Road Pulgaon naka, Durg (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ..i.._..-._ r' I (i8^ l,-HC.22 sn^T^r f^Fii<=b 'sn^r sh^ich ^f^a ^ ^sf ^l^lld^ ^Tl1^41<o, facrtl^y ^(TOT tra^? . ../!dj...:.P..CC.^.'?T^ ' 1 L? ^ KU.....^....^^.....^..-^..-^/ '200 \'^ ^W^il ^b^lc^-^ 1:N^sr' ^TT^T ^RT^R ^rf^T ISB : Hoa'ble Shri Manindr^ 27.4.2011 Shri Varunendra Mis:hr^; Shri Sourabh Sharma ^ respondents No. 1 & 2/Bank| Shri Vaibhav A. Goverdl Heai'd. The giievance^ which 4 this petition, is that even tho^ his liability towai'ds re-paym| respondent-Baiik, tiie title d| retLinied, Though the respond| disputed the aforesaid st.at docunient. on rccord has bet Bank. In that application, i1| ready aud willing to retun^ fuliilliiient of condition No/2l parties and that a lett.er dat^d petitioner to bring to an end ^ Leanied counsel for the no other petition has been fil petitioner, chl^f<rl<lilrt "HR^f ^ 'fe^t <F?i^K '^^qrf^WSTT^T Mohan Shrivastava, J.1 i, counsel for the petitioner. nth Shri Aditya Sharma counsel for lan, counsel for respondent No,3. as been raised by the petitiouer in igh the petitioner is discharged from ent. of loan advanced to him bv the seds of the petitioner are not. being ent-Baiik has not. substantiallv ;.ement, an appMcafion for takm^ en flled today by the respoudeut - has been stated that the Bank is the collateral seci.irit.y siibject to of settlement arrived between the 28.3.2011 has been issued t.o the ^Il litigation bet\veen the parties. petitioner submits that except this; ;d or pendmg at the instarice of the [Tft^'^fe?t ^'.^. ^ ••^.ta.'-'-j ^i.HC-22- ^ s:^^/ '^^^' 37T^T^FT r<rii<=h 'STT^T ?ti4-iicfr) <if^a Ptaveen ^^r ^i^iid<Li, ^•dl^^ito, l^rray 3TT^T ^S^ % WRCTWflt^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ fc|<b<^T* 200 W^T'^<!rT8?T'Hf^T 2- In view of the submis^: leamed counsel for the parti| requh'ed to be flnally dispose<|: Accordingly^ tliis petil) direction that respondent sh| petitioner without further del{ lons which are now being made by 5S before this Court, this petition is of. ion is Imally disposed of with a all now retLini the title deed to the 3.V. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge chl1Lli<rl41-l ^\w^\\ ^ 'feTst <p3l^i< ^T'yrf^TR: ^TT^T [Tft^'^fe^