IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1252 of 2010 SIDHESHWAR RAM S/O LATE BHAGERA RAM R/O VILL.- SAHDAT NAGAR, P.O. JAITIYA, P.S. DHANRWA, DISTT.- PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SRI C.K. MISHRA, COMMISSIONER-CUM- PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. SRI BHANU PRATAP SHARMA, COMMISSIONER- CUM-PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA ----------- 02. 16.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Board and Government Advocate No. IV appearing for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order has not been complied with. On the other hand, learned counsel for the Opposite Party submits that on perusal of the order as contained in Annexure- 3, it would appear that the representation of the petitioner was considered and disposed of by a reasoned order. As such, the contempt application need not proceed further. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Board has passed the order arbitrarily since the payments are being made by pick and chose. Be that as it may, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the authority, it will be open for the petitioner to assail the same in accordance with law. In view of the above, since the order has been 2 complied with, this contempt application need not proceed further and the same stands disposed of. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)