1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 11 of 2009 Bank of Baroda and anr v. Bank of Baroda and ors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr S.G. Shukla, Advocate for petitioners Coram : D.D. Sinha and A.P. Bhangale, JJ Dated : 4th May 2009 Heard Mr S.G. Shukla, learned counsel for petitioners. Impugned communications are of 2002 whereby petitioners are informed that they are not entitled to get medical benefit in view of regulation 29 of the Bank of Baroda (Employees’ Pension) Regulations, 1995 since the petitioners have opted for BOBEVRS-2001. Since the impugned communications dated 5.3.2002 and 6.6.2002 are issued by respondent way back in 2002 rejecting representation of members of petitioner Association preferred in 2001, we feel no justifiable reason for delay caused in approaching this Court after so many years and, therefore, petition suffers from delay and latches. The same is dismissed on this count. Judge Judge 2 hsj