IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.13031 of 2006 Between: Erugula Koti Reddy S/o.Bali Reddy R/o.Chintalapalem, Darsi Mandalam, Prakasam District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintending Engineer, (PR) RWS(P) Circle, Ongole, Prakasam District 2 The Executive Engineer, RWS (P) Division, Podili, Prakasam District 3 The Sub-Divisonal Engineer, RWS (P)Division, Darsi, Prakasam District 4 The Assistant Executive Engineer, RWS (P) Division, Darsi, Prakasam District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction particularly writ of mandamus directing the respondents to implement the orders of the first respondent in Memo No.AEES/RWS/MTC.of CPWSS/PKM/2005 dated 19.12.2005 and provide public tap connection to the locality people of Chintalapalam, Darsi mandal, Prakasam District under "CPWS Scheme" (Neatherland Aided Project-IAP). Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.N.NARASIMHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.13031 of 2006 ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ JUSTICE G.ROHINI 21st July, 2008. IBL