1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11529 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL ST. NO. 22775 OF 2009 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s | orders orders | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Ramchandra S. Patil, Advocate h/f Mr. S.S. Choudhari, Advocate for the applicants. CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATE : 27TH NOVEMBER, 2009 . Heard Counsel for the applicants. 2. The delay is only of 16 days. The applicant submits that the time consumed in obtaining certified copies and making necessary arrangement for filing of the Second Appeal, should be considered. The applicant is an agriculturist and was engaged in agricultural operation when the impugned judgment was rendered. 3. Considering the explanation given 2 in the application, I find that there was sufficient cause and hence delay is condoned. The application is allowed. [ V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] sut/NOV09/ca11529.09