FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8448 OF 2011 " Narendra Soma Borse Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. D.R. Irale Patil, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.K. Tambe, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 Mr. S.R Deshpande, Advocate for respondent No.3. Mr. Y.K. Bobade, Advocate holding for Mr. S.S. Tope, Advocate for respondent No.4. CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATE :- 18TH NOVEMBER, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of parties, taken up for final hearing. 2] The limited grievance raised by the petitioner is that though the petitioner has appeared for M.Sc. (Agri.) Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science examination, his result has not been declared since the petitioner has not submitted the validity certificate of belonging to Scheduled Tribe category. 3] The learned counsel for respondent No.3 vehemently opposes the petition on the ground that though the petitioner had given an undertaking that he would submit the validity certificate, he has not produced the same and as such, his result has been FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8448 OF 2011 " Narendra Soma Borse Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 rightly withheld by the respondent No.3. 4] It is not in the hands of the petitioner as to within how much period the respondent No.2 should decide the validity of the petitioner. The petitioner cannot be penalized for inaction on the part of the respondents. 5] Writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.3 to declare the result of the petitioner. However, it is made clear that merely because we are directing the result of the petitioner to be declared, it should not in any way be construed that we are considering the claim of the petitioner to be belonging to a scheduled tribe, with any merits. [M.T. JOSHI,J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/-