IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-1689 of 2011 Date of Decision: 19.01.2011 Aarti and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Anil Kumar Malik, Advocate for the petitioners. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 to 7. It is contended that petitioner No.2 is in government job as a trainer in the red cross society at Panipat and taking salary more than ` 10,000/- p.m. The petitioners No.1 and 2 are major and mature. The petitioner No.2 is 46 years old and the petitioner No.1 is 38 years old. The petitioners along with their counsel are present in the Court. The petitioner No.2 is stated to be blind. It is not understood as to why the family of petitioner No.2 is opposing the said marriage. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to Superintendent of Police, Panipat to look into the threat perception and ensure that no physical harm is caused to the present petitioners at the hands of the private respondents. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 19.01.2011 JUDGE gurpreet