IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 17TH JULY 2007 / 26TH ASHADHA 1929 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1078 of 2007() ------------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 12/01/2007 IN CMP3820/06 28/10/06 IN CMP.3504/2006 of ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, TRIVANDRUM .................... REVN. PETITIONER: COMPLAINANT ----------------------------- STEPHEN ROZARIO, CHAIRMAN, NIYAMASAHAYAVEDI, T.C.26/150, VANCHIYOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.MOHANAN RESPONDENTS: ACCUSED -------------------- 1. V.SURENDRAN PILLAI, MLA QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. K.P.JAYACHANDRAN, ADVOCATE & NOTARY PUBLIC, VANCHIYOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. SAJEEVAN, BROTHER-IN-LAW OF 1ST RESPONDENT. 4. ANOTHER PERSON, WHO COULD BE IDENTIFIED. 5. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PROSECUTION, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.SREEKUMAR SRI.SUJITH MATHEW JOSE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.K.S.SIVAKUMAR THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Crl. R.P. No. 1078 OF 2007 D ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 17th day of July, 2007 O R D E R When this revision came up for final hearing, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that he has filed a memo to the effect that the revision petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the complaint any further and consequently he also does not wish to prosecute the revision petition. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed as not pressed. (V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE) aks