PETITIONERS 1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH Ar BILASPUR (CG) WRIT PETITION (S) No. / @3 /2oo7 / 1. Faguram Koshle, aged about 33 years, son of Shri Maguram Koshle, caste Satnami, Assistant Teacher, Government Tribal Primary School — r Ratamati, Jashpur Nagar, Distt. Jashpur (Chhattisgarh) Smt. Kumodini Xalco, aged about 42 years, wife of Shri Isdore Xalco, caste Uraon, Assistant Teacher, Government Tribal Primary School Jakba, Vikas Khand Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) /3. Devkumar Bhagat, aged about 43 years, son of Shri Tembaram Bhagat, caste Uraon, Assistant Teacher, Government Tribal Primary School Bhelwajiv, Nawatoli, Jashpur Nagar, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) Ku Nandini Bai, (After marriage Smt. Nandini Bhagat) aged about 36 years, Wife of Shri Jatru Ram, Assistant Teacher, Government Tribal Primary School Neemgaon, Distt. Jashpur (CG) x, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION .OFVINDIA, VERSUS / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through — ' Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Assistant Commissioner, Deptt of Tribal Welfare, District Jashpur (CG) g HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W'. P.(5) No. 122 of 2007 Petitioner : Ram Karon Ram Versus Re$ondewrs : Stan of Chha‘Hisgarh & omrs w. ms) No. 14o or 2007 Pcfifioner : Gendlal Pate! Versus Rzsponden'rs : S‘ra‘te of Chha‘hisgnrh & mo'rher w. P45) No. 141 of 2007 Pefi'fioner : Gopal Prasad Bhqradwqi Versus Respondents i State of Chho'h'isgarh & anofher w. P45) No. 162 of 2007 Pditioner i Joglol Ram Versus Raspondenfs : State of Chha‘r'risgarh & ano'ther w. ms) No. 163 of 2007 Pefii’iomr : Sm‘r. Sudha Bhagaf Versus Rzsponden‘rs i State of Chhattisgarh & another W. P.(5) No. 164 of 2007 Petitioner : Vidmwakarma Ruthie Versus Respondents : State of Chhottisgorh & another I W, P.(5) No. 166 of 2007 Petitioners Ibalin Ekko and mother Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgorh & another w. ms) No. 107 0f 2007 Petitioner : Abraham Ekko Versus Mondents : State of Chhattisgarh & another W. P.(5) No. 181 af 2007 Pe‘ri'rioner : Ram Singh Ma“ Versus Respondenfs : Sm‘ra of Chhnfrisgalh & ano'thzr. W.VP.(S).No. 182 of 2007 efifioner : Teekamm Nnynk Versus Respondents i Smfe‘ of Chhaffisgarh & ano'ther W. P.(5) No. 183 of 2007 Pstitiomrs Faguram Koshle and ofhers Varsus Respondents : State of Chha‘rfisgarh & another And W. P.(5) No. 186 of 2007 Pafifioner Ku. Abristo Khes Versus wonder.“ : State of Chhoftisgarh & anofher SB: Hon'ble Mr. Jusfice Safish K. Agniho'fri, J' Present Shri A.N. Hmkfn, Advoonfe for “the pe‘m‘ioners (s). Mrs. Anju Ahuju, Depu‘ry Government Advoca're, Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer, Ms. Sunifa Join, Panel Lawyer for the respondenfs/Sfah. O R D E R (Passedon this 17’“ Day of January, 2007) The following order of fhe Court is passed by Sofish K. Agniho‘l'ri. J. 1. Learned counsel appearing for 1he petitioners as well as for the Stow/respondents joinfly submif fhaf The facts of The presen'r writ P pe‘ri‘tions are similar To fha'f of in W. P. (S) No. 5473/2006 (Rnkesh Kumar Shanna & ano‘l’hei- vs. S'ra1e of Chhatfisgarh 6: o1hers), which was disposed of vide order dafed 9.10.2006. They further wbmit ‘I'ha'r 1h: quesfion of low involved is also 1he same. 2. In yiéw of fhe above-stated wbmissions made by learned counsel for xx; fhe parfles flies: wri'r pe'rifions are disposed of in ferms of the order dated 9.10.2006 passed by 'l‘his Cour'r in W. P. (S) No. 5473/2006 (Rakesh Kumar Sharma & ano'rher vs. Sfa're of Chha‘rtisgarh 6i ofhers). No order as To costs. 3. A copy of this order be plat-ed on record in connected matters. l Sdl- ' l Satish K. Agnihotri l Judge Subhash