IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.21333 of 2010 Date of Decision: December 01, 2010 Ajit Singh .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab and others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Rajesh K. Dadwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to release the retiral benefits to the petitioner. Prayer is also for issuing direction to the respondents to decide the appeal filed by the petitioner against punishment of recovery. 2. Learned counsel contends that the petitioner superannuated on 31.3.2010. Retiral benefits, however, have not been released. 3. From the pleadings, I do not find CWP No.21333 of 2010 [2] any specific averment that would indicate that the petitioner has followed the dictats of Rule 9.6 of Chapter IX (Punjab Civil Services Rules, Volume II). 4. Learned counsel wants to withdraw the petition so as to enable the petitioner to file a fresh petition with complete particulars and proper foundation. 5. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (AJAI LAMBA) December 01, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?