IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3719 of 2006 MD.NAQUEE IMAM, son of Late Md. Wali Hassan, resident of Bakerganj Bajaja, P.S. Pirbahore, District Patna. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Road Construction Department, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Engineer-in-Chief, Road Construction Department, Bihar, Patna. 4. The Engineer-in-Chief, Rural Engineering Organisation, Bihar, Patna. 5. The Chief Engineer, Rural Engineering Organisation, Bihar, Patna. 6. The Chief Engineer, Advance Planning Wing, Road Construction Department, South Bihar Wing, Patna. 7. The Under Secretary, Road Construction Department, Bihar, Patna. 8. The Executive Engineer, Road Design & Planning Division-1, Advance Planning, Road Construction Department, Patna. 9. The District Development Commissioner, Chatra, Jharkhand. 10. The Block Development Officer, Pratappur Block, District Chatra, Jharkhand. 11. The Block Development Officer, Simaria Block, District Chatra, Jharkhand. 12. The Accountant General of Bihar, Bir Chand Patel, Bihar, Patna. 13. The District Provident Fund Officer, Patna. ---Respondents ----------- 3. 9.7.2010 As prayed for by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the District Provident Fund Officer, Patna is permitted to be added as respondent no.13. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the State of Bihar as well as the learned counsel for the State of Jharkhand and the Accountant General, Bihar. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 31st of December, 2003 from the post of Junior Engineer while working in the office of the Executive Engineer, Road 2 Design and Planning Division No.1, Advance Planning Wing, Road Construction Department, Patna, all his retiral dues i.e., final pension, gratuity, G.P.F., leave encashment and group insurance as also some other dues have not been paid to him till date despite his persistent efforts. It is submitted that even though the petitioner is entitled to all his retiral dues within a reasonably time as he has submitted all the requisite forms for payment of his aforesaid retiral dues, but the same have not been paid. As such, the petitioner is entitled to all his unpaid dues with interest for delay. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents have raised various pleas in the respective counter affidavits filed on their behalf. Without going into the details, the petitioner is permitted to file a representation by stating all his unpaid claims distinctly enclosing the copy of the all relevant documents in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four week. In case such a representation is filed before the Executive Engineer, Road Design & Planning Division-1, Advance Planning, Road Construction Department, Patna (respondent no.8) with a copy each to the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna (respondent no.12) and the District Provident Fund Officer, Patna (respondent no.13), the unpaid claims of the petitioner be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the 3 petitioner as raised in his representation may be settled and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid with interest permissible under the rules. Upon consideration, if any of the claims or part of the claims is found not admissible, the same shall be informed to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)