IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 295 of 2002 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 25.1.2002 in WP NO : 1117 OF 2002 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 Sri Dhannu Singh S/o Durga Singh R/o 2-3-568, Ramgopalpet, Secunderabad. 2 Sri Amar Singh S/o Durga Singh R/o 2-3-568, Ramgopalpet, Secunderabad. 3 Sri Seetal Singh S/o Durga Singh R/o 2-3-568, Ramgopalpet, Secunderabad. ..... APPELLANTS AND 1 The Commissioner, M.C.H. Tankbund Road, Hyderabad. 2 The Collector, Hyderabad District Nampally Station Road, Hyderabad. 3 Govt of A.P., Rep. by its Secretary, Municipal Administration, Secretariat, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant:MR.MUDDU VIJAY Counsel for the Respondent No.: SMT.G.JYOTHI KIRAN The Court made the following : ORAL JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari) It is represented by the learned counsel for the appellants that the cause in the Writ Appeal does not survive and the Writ Appeal has become infrcutuous. Recording the same, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to cost. ____________________ Justice T.Meena Kumari __________________ Justice Sanjay Kumar June 4, 2009 MAS.