IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3173 of 2005 SACHITA PRASAD SON OF NANHU LAL, POPULAR NURSING HOME CHAUHATTA PATNA – 80004. – PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA , THROUGH P.F. COMMISSIONER, REGIONAL OFFICE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, SARPENTAINE ROAD, R-BLOCKI, PATNA. 2. ASSISTANT P.F. COMMISSIONER (PENSION) REGIONAL OFFICE, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, 6 SERPENTINE ROAD, R- BLOCK, PATNA – BIHAR. ----- RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2/ 18-05-2011 None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the present writ petition. However, Mr. R. S. Pradhan, learned Senior Counsel, appearing on behalf of the respondents, is present and has placed his reliance on the averments made in the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents. According to him, the grievances raised on behalf of the petitioner in the present proceeding have already been redressed by the respondent- authorities. Be that as it may, writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. BTiwary/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)