^ HSQH COURT OF CHHATTISOARH AT Slnaie Bench : Hon'bie Shri DiSio Raosaheb Oeshmukh. J. MisceSlaneous Aooeal No.1087^2004 AooeJlante Applicants ^. Resoondents 1. ShanttLa{JainS^oSukhJal,jaJn.Aged about 55 years. 2. Smt. KamSa Bai, W/o Shanti Lal Jain, Aged about 50 years. 3. Ku. Sunita, D/o Shantj Lat Jain, Aged about19years. 4. Suresh, S/o Shanti La! Jain, Aged about18years. AS! R/o Station Road, Polesaya Para, Durg, Tahsit and Dlstrict Durg(CG) vereiis 1. Purushottam Phadake, S/o Namdev Phadake, Agedabout 51 years, R/o Vinobha Bhave Nagar, Tumsar, District Bhandara, (Maharashtra) 2. Smt SushHa Devi Satyanarayan Tambi, W/o Satyanarayan Tambi, R/o 506, Swapnjok, Compfex, Vartman Nagar, Nagpur, (Maharashtra) 3. National insurance Company Ljmjted, Gondia Branch OfRce, Shree Taikies Road, Gondia, (M.H.) Appea! under Section 173 ofthe Motor Vehtdes Act. 1988 -,^^-.. Present : Shri N.S.Dhurandhar, counse! for the appellants. Shri Shreo Kumar Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Shri Vlvek Shrivastava, counssl for respondent No.S/lnsurance Company. Non^ appears for other respondents. (Passed on 4th of March, 2008) Heard. (2) Being aggrieved foy the impugnecl 31-07-2004 ^nd by the 2uu'Ad~dJtionaJ Motor AccldBnte Claims TribunaS, Duro B , ";:"' 1' l_^^]iIS^^^^^ -2-— (henceforth 'the MACT') jn Claim Case No.53/2001, whereby a sum of Rs.2,30.900/- has awarded towards compensation in an injury case, the appeilants/claimants have preferred this appeal for enhancement of the cqmpensation. (3) During the course of arguments, a settiement was arrived at whereunder the insurance company agreed to pay a sum of Rs.30,000/- over and above the compensation already awarded by the MACT, by depositing the same within a period of two months from today. (4) Shri N. 8. Dhurandhar, jearned counsei for the appejjants/claimants agrees to the settlement. (5) (n vtew of the settlement arrived at, the award passed by the M.A.C.T. is modjfied and an acjditlonal sum of Rs.30,000/- over and above the sum already awarded by the MACT js awarded as compensation to the appeiiants/cjaimants. The respondent No.3?'jnsurance company shali deposit a sum of Rs.30,000/- with the IVIA.CT wjthin a period pf.wo months from today. (6) WJth the aforesaid djrectlon. the miscellaneous appeal stands disposed of. A copy of this order be sent to the MACT forthwjth. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge ^\ ^^^ir—3-—^ -^—^-^^ . y,