IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36089 of 2009 1. RAM EKBAL RAM @ RAM EKWAL S/O JAGDISH RAM VILL- RATWARA, P,.S- AURAI, DISTT- MUZAFFARPUR --- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR --- OPP. PARTY ----------- 03. 10.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Nobody appears on behalf of the State. Petitioner has renewed prayer for grant of bail in a case instituted under diverse Sections of the Penal Code including Section 307 of the Penal Code. Earlier his prayer for grant of bail was rejected by this Court under order dated 06.07.2009 (Annexure-1), to the bail application. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petitioner had also lodged a case against the present informant and others. Referring to annexure-3, it is contended that the doctor found the injuries sustained by the present informant to be simple in nature. Learned counsel for the petitioner further highlights that the petitioner has remained in custody for about nine months. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is prepared to extend the privilege of bail to the petitioner. Let petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the CJM, Muzaffarpur in 2 connection with Aurai P.S. Case No. 23 of 2009, subject to the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors should be the own/close family member of the petitioner. (ii) The petitioner shall appear in person before the Court below on each date fixed at the trial after the charges are framed. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, it shall be open to the trial Court to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and secure his arrest in accordance with law. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)