IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 8317 of 2007 Between: R. Sudhakar s/o. Ramaiah R/o. Arur Village, Sathyavedu Mandal, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer, (Land Acquisition Officer) Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 2 The District Collector, Chittoor, Chittoor District. 3 Andhra pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited, Rep. by its Vice Chairman & Manging Director, Hyderabad. 4 Andhra pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited, Rep by its Zonal Manager, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 5 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Land Acquisition, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the notifications in Roc No,. G2/3699/06 Roc No. G2/3700/06 dt. 18-3-2006 published in The Andhra Pradesh Gazette Extraordinary, Chittoor dt. 18-3-2006 issued under section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act 1984 in so far as relates to the agricultural lands of the petitioner to an extents of Ac 1-04 cents , Ac 0-58 cents, Ac 0-48 cents, Ac 0-15 cents , Ac 0-05 cents, Ac 0-21 cents , Ac 0- 59 Cents Ac 0-18 cents Ac 0-16 cents Ac 0-21 cents Ac 0-31 cents , Ac 0- 31 cents Ac 0-17 cents Ac 0-94 cents Ac 0-74 cents , Ac 0-18 cents , Ac 0- 59 cents Ac 0-18 cents, Ac 0-38 cents in Sy.No.s 207/6, 208/1, 208/2, 208/3, 208/4, 208/5, 208/6, 208/7, 208/8, 208/9, 203/20, 203/21, 203/24, 206/1, 207/1, 207/3, 207/2, 207/4, 207/5 respectively situated at Arur Village, Sathyavedu Mandal, Chittoor District as being illegal, arbitrary violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and to set aside the impugned notifications and consequently the respondents be directed not to dispossess the petitioner in respect of the lands of the said survey Numbers and to pass such other and further orders that may be deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.V.MUNI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : O R D E R:- The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded, and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 29th July, 2009 bcj