IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11105 of 2009 MAULI YADAV, Son of Sri Dhirik Yadav, Resident of Tarter, P.S.-Ghoswari, District-Patna Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 20.07.2009 Petitioner came to be remanded in the present case on 10.12.2008 in relation to Mokama(Goshwari)P.S. Case No. 213 of 1987 for the offence under Sections 364, 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that in the F.I.R. he has not been named but in a restatement probably his name has been taken but there is nothing in terms of evidence to link the petitioner with the said crime which was registered under Sections 364, 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is further stated that the petitioner has been available to the police for investigation. From the case diary, it emerges that he was even questioned by the police in judicial custody in relation to yet another case but since then nothing was done in the matter therefore, the petitioner had no occasion to approach this Court for any kind of protection. It is also submitted that other 2 co-accused has been also given indulgence of bail. Looking at the period when the case came to be instituted and when he has been remanded in this case he should be given benefit of bail. In view of the above, let the petitioner, Mauli Yadav, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/-(twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh in connection with Mokma (Ghoshwari) P.S. Case No. 213/87 with a direction that one of the sureties will be executed by an elected representative of the area and the other by the father of the petitioner namely, Sri Dhirik Yadav on due identification by the court below. Needless to say that since it is an old matter the Court directs the petitioner to cooperate in the trial of the matter who shall appear on each and every date personally. Bibhash (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)