1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7416 OF 2009 Ketkar Nagar Bhavan and N.M.Ranade Mofat Vachanalaya. ..Petitioner. Vs. Mrs. Nilam C.Shelukar and anr. ..Respondents. Mr.U.R.Mankapure for the Petitioner. CORAM :R.S.MOHITE, J. DATE : 24TH NOVEMBER,2009 PC: 1 Heard both sides. 2 This is a writ petition filed by the employer impugning a revisional judgment and order passed by the Industrial Court, Nashik in Revision (ULP) No.76 of 2007. By the impugned judgment and order, the Revisional Court has modified the judgment and order passed by the Labour Court, Nashik in Complaint (ULP)No.12 of 2004 under MRTU & PULP Act,1971. Labour Court has held that the 2 employer had indulged in unfair labour practice under item 1 (a,b,d,f,g )of Schedule IV of the MRTP & PULP Act, 1971 and granted compensation of Rs. 20,000/-. The reasons given by the Labour Court were that during the pendency of the complaint other employee had been appointed and granting prayer of reinstatement would cause inconvenience to the other employee. In this regard, it is seen that the management was fully aware that the complainant employee was agitating her rights through a complaint which she had filed. The revisional court has held that the reasons for merely awarding compensation of Rs.20,000/- were not adequate and granted reinstatement with back wages. I am of the view, that no interference is called for in the impugned order passed by the revisional court. Hence, petition is rejected. (R.S.MOHITE, J.)