Cri. Appln. No. 4703/11 1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4703 OF 2011 1. Shashikant s/o. Dasrao Phatak, 2. Kalidas s/o. Rambhau Jadhav ....Applicants. Versus The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent. Mr. S.S. Thombre, Advocate for applicants. Mr. S.D. Kaldate, APP for State. CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J. DATED : 4th November, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. The earlier application for anticipatory bail was rejected by this Court on 5.10.2011. The learned counsel for the applicants submits that now the Collector has passed the order which will go to show that the custodial interrogation of the applicants is not required. The order of the Collector, however, does not show that he has arrived at some other conclusion. The Collector has merely observed that since the offence is registered, the matter is subjudice and therefore, subject to the decision in Cri. Appln. No. 4703/11 2 the criminal application, the explanation of the applicants was accepted. 3. In view of this matter, I do not find any change in the circumstances. The application is, therefore, dismissed. [ M. T. JOSHI ] Vacation Judge ssc/