IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.49221 of 2008 1.SANGITA VERMA @ SANGITA KUMARI @ SANGEETA DEVI W/O-Jitendra Singh, R/O-Vill-Bhanas, P.S.-Dinara (O.P.-Bhanas), Distt.-Rohtas. 2.JITENDRA SINGH S/O-Late Hari Singh, R/O-Vill-Bhanas, P.S.-Dinara (O.P. Bhanas), Distt.-Rohtas. …………………………………………..Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ……………………………………..Opposite Party. ----------- 3/ 08.04.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State and learned Counsel for the informant. The case has been registered under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioners who was wife and husband. The informant has alleged that her daughter was pregnant of three months, she went for treatment in the clinic of the petitioners’ but due to excessive bleeding she died. Submission is that in course of investigation the informant has stated that his daughter has gone for another purpose which is for taking Vasectomy. At best the case comes under Section 304 of the Indian Penal Code and not under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned Counsel for the informant has - 2 - opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection with Dinara P.S. Case No. 30 of 2008. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)