HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Wnt Petition No. 2356 of 2006 Petitioner Sharad P. Avachar Aged - 48 yeare, Son of Shri Punjaji Avachar Postsd as - L.D.T., At - S.S. Kalibadi Hr. Sec. School, Kalibadi, Raipur, Distrtet - Raipur (C.G.) R/o H. No. 38, Near Sftiv Mandir, S.B.I. Colony, Sunder Nagar, Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) Vereus Respondents The State of ChhatBsgarh Through- The Secretaiy, School Educafion Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur The Krector, Public InstructioRs. Chhatfisgarh Head Quarter at - Raipur. The Goveming Body of Katibadi Shlksha SamiU, Through-lts School Secretary, S.S. Kali Badi Hr. Sec. School, Kalibadi, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETmON U/A - 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTK^ OF INDIA 1. 2 3 SB: Hon'bte Justice Shri Satish K. Agnlhotri Present: Mr. R.K. Keshanrani, Advocate for e peUtioner. Ms. Deepali Pandey, Panel lawyerforthe respondenfe No. 1 and 2/State. ORDER (Passed on this 16m day ofApril, 2007) The quesUon of law involved herein is whether the non-teaching stsfl working in Govemment aided school are entiUed to the benefit of recommendations ofthe Fifth Pay Commlssion under the provisions ofthe Madhya Pradesh Ashaskiya Sikshan Sanstha (Adh^ipsricon Tattia fiw/a Karmchariyon Ke Vetano Ka Sandaya) Adhiniyam, 1978 (hencrferth 'Vne Adhiniyam, 1978') and the rules made thereunder rsad with the h4adhya Pradesh Revision <rf Pay Rules, 1888 (hencefortti ^he Pay Rules, 1988'). Leamed counsel appearing for the pditioner submits that the terms and condlttons of the teaching and non-teachirg siaff are govemed by Ihe Thakur same provisions of law which were under consideration ,by this Court in the matter of Smt. A. Lall vs. State of ChhatBsgarh and other connected matters (W.P. No. 4108 of 2005), whereln by the judgment and ordar dated 6.2.2007, this Court held that the petittoners who are working in tatty Govemment aided private schoots are entittod to the revlsed pay-scales with effect firom 1.1 .1996 as prescribed imder the Pay Rutes, 1988. This Court further for the purpose of payment of arrears had granted certain direction. Admittedly and jointly, It is submitted by Uie parties that this matter is squarety covered by the judgmerrt and order dated 6.22007 passed by this Court in the case of Smt. A. Lall vs. State of ChhatUsgarh and othsr connected matters (Supra). As a result, fbr the rMsons stated in the judgment and order dated 6.2.2007 passed in W.P. No. 4108 of 2005 (Smt. A. Lall vs. State of Chhattisgarh and other connected mattera) (Supra), the writ petffion te allowed in the same terms and conditions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge