Writ_Petfflon_(S)_N<»,3§40_of.2^8 Krishna Kumar iViiri, S/'o. Shri Pakiu Ram Miri, ^Qed sbout 41 v©3fs.worklncT ss P3t\fl/sf' st 'P.H. No.13, Gidhori, Tahsli Kasdote, Distt. Raipur (CG).. Versus 1) State ot' Chhattisgam, through its Secretary, D9oarl'msnt of RSVSPUS. D.K-S. Qnswsn. Ra'.our 'y^./^.\ f^/'\^I'l. V^ 2) Coilector, Distt. Raipur iCG'j. 3) Bhskan Chand Baghe!, vrorking as Pawari at P.H. No.62, Arang, Distt. Raipur (CG). fWrit Petition under Articie 226 or She ConstitLiiion of inoia) SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K..Aflnlhotri. J. !hri P.S. Koshy, counse! for ths pstitionsr. Shri Arjn Sao. Govt. Advocate for the Siats. ORAL ORDER ilh (Passed on 11" day of^uly, 2008) VVith oonseni of leamed counsei appearing for both the parties, the 'matter is heard finaliy; <:) Learnea counsei appearing tor Vne petitioner suomiis tnat the petttioner does not vi/ant to press this petition on merits, at this stage. However, the petitioner may be permittsd to make a representation bemre She concemed autnont!es witnin a perioa ot tilree ciays and tne same may be airected to be decided, ;n accordance with law, within the prescribecl time. 3) Shri Arun Sao, learned Govt. Advocate appearing ror the State submits ihat if tne repressntation is made, the same shaii be considered and deoided bv ihe concerned authority, in accoroance with law, on its own merits, withln a period of two weeks f'rom the date of receipt of the representation. 4) in view of the foregoing, nothlng sun/ives in the matter. Mr. Sao further submits that no coereive steps shail be taken against the petitioner. tiil the disposa! of the representation. ul Acoordingiy, the petiilon is disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge