S§l§Y “raw v ‘9wmw cammmpu ormay! (m&eah.6- .i $ingg's: @gnch w P no 843 OF 2605‘ BETWEEN /Habu Bakhah aged about 33 years S/O Shri Shiv Kumar, p. Ex-Demonstrator, Govt. Poiytechnic Coilege, § bikapur, Tehsil: Ambikapur, District; Sarguja (C.G.) MD The State of Chhattisgarh, Through: sacretary, Man Power & Planning Department, Mantraiay D.K.S.Building , Raipur, Tehsil and Dist.- Raipur (C.G.: The Secretary Law & Legislative Department, Mantralay D.K.S. Building; Raipur, Tehsil and Dist- Raipur (C.G.)v The State Administrative Tribunal, ' Though; Registrar General, District: Jabalpu‘r (M.P;) The Principal, Govt. Polytechnic College, Amhikapur, District: Sarguja (C.G.) Union of India, Through the Secretary, Law 8i Legislative Department, New Delhi W XI—HC-78 KN Ewaawmaw aéwma %Wmmg (gff‘i/ (ii lg? 2005’ mmaaiaw) mm w wmvm $amRa%aa m WW§WW %3T%u3n%v loriginal application ' Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur, has not been transferred to this Court till date. Learned counsel submits that the present petitioner is the applicant before the Tribunal. He also submits that after abolition of the SAT, the mcords havé b66n . Department Raipur Where the file is pendinc’ records of the said original appllcation be called or transfen d fiom the .enti Raipunas early as posmble and’the hoe with law. submits that since the SAT. has; been 1t in transferring the matter to this Court ‘ed in a routine manner, $tate counsel does‘net op The prayer is allowed. Lei; the records of QA‘NO. Raipur, disposed off Certified copy as per rules, The petition stands fixiallj) Gcnfmal Admmlstrauon. Depar’m matter be disposed of in accorda Couns€1 {Or the" petiticne; abolished, there is no impedimm ‘ as the matters are to be tranSfez‘ 15.3.2005 Sl r1 Plaveen Verma, Coursel for the petitioner. Qhm Sandeep Dubey, Govt, Advocate for the State on advance l copy, l.A.No. 1686 of 2005 for urgent hearing is allowed Heard . ' The main grievance of to No.3903, le petitioner is that the records of the '1995 MP. Stair: filed before the received by the General Administration He makes q praver that the Qose this limited prayer, 3903/199 5 be transferred from he GAD, Sd/- SUNIL KUMAR SINHA Judge t ' ’ W 33W,WW,W {V mm O o¢o.¢Ko...oo‘3oH3o"Hi b‘ yJg ‘ f 3w: 2005 wm(13*aaam mmm , M. t $mhmmmm%§%éh%gR aawm \ copy. I The main grievance of t: a , le petitioner is that ,the records of the origin'al application No.3903l'1995 Acfministi"ative Tfiiauhal, Jaba1p1 till date. ‘Legrnecl counsel sub applioant before the Tribunal. l S.A.T., the records have been 15.3.?005 ‘ « ‘ 1Shri Praveen Verma, cour. sel for>the petitioner. Shri Saindeep Dubey, Govt. Advocate for the State on advanc ‘ ‘ LAND. 1686 of 2005 for urgent hearing is allowed“ 1 Heard‘ \ ” \ filed before the MP. State tr, has not been transferred to this Coult mits that the present petitioner is 'the [e also submits that after abolition of the received by the General Administration Department; Raipur Where thefi e is pending. He makes a prayer that the records of the said original app ication be called or transferred from the General AdministrationiDepart ent, Raipur, as early as possible and the rhatter be disposed of in accord ce with law. t Counsel for the petitione submits that since the S.A.T'. has been abolished, there is no impedimel t in transierring the'matter to this Court as the matters are to be transfer State counsel does'not op The prayer is allowed. Let the records of O.A.No Raipur. disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. / Sd/- 'SUNH. KUMAR SNHA \""\ \ Judge The petition stands finaib red in a routine manner. I pose this limited prayer. 3903/ 1995 be transferred from the GAD, i ‘_r \ . e