IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No. 10170 of 2001 Between: 1 Godavarthi Trinadha Rao S/o.Pattabhirammayya R/o.Appanapalli , Mamidikuduru Mandal. 2 Godavarthi Sreelakshmi Devi W/o. Trinadha Rao R/o.Appanapalli , Mamidikuduru Mandal. 3 Godavarthi Ramakrishna S/o.Pattabhiramayya R/o.Rajahmundry. 4 Godavarthi Seethamahalakshmi W/o. Ramakrishna R/o.Appanapalli , Mamidikuduru Mandal. 5 Godavarthi Ramalingeawara Rao S/o.Pattabhiramayya R/o.Appanapalli , Mamidikuduru Mandal. 6 Godavarthi Venkata Durga Pushpavathi W/o.Ramalingeswararao R/o.Appanapalli , Mamidikuduru Mandal. 7 Bolla Venkata Ratnakumar S/o.Viswanadha Chowdary Flot No.FF2, Duke's Mansion, 100 Spensor's Road, Bangalore -560 005. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Authorised Officer, Land Reforms , Kakinada, E.G.Dist. 2 The Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal, (East Godavari District), Kakinada. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Amalapuram , E.G.District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ , order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus , directing the respondents to accept the surrender of the land being an extent of Ac.3.04 Cts. inR.S.No.137/1A and extent of Ac.1.56 Cts. in R.s.No.137/1C of Appanapalli Village, Mamidikuduru Mandal , East Godavari District declaring the action of the respondents as illegal and ultra vires to the provisions of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.JOSYULA.BHASKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent : GP FOR REVENUE FOR R THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No. 10170 of 2001 ORDER: Though the writ petition is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, neither Sri Joysula Bhaskara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, is present nor is there any representation on his behalf. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed for non- prosecution. No costs. RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J Dt:27.01.2009 usd