IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.M-18881 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 16.7.2009. Teja alias Tej Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. Sushil Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJESH BINDAL J. **** The allegation against the petitioner is that he had committed rape upon Seema for which FIR was registered against him. To seek pre-arrest bail the application is supported by an affidavit sworn by the victim where she has denied the incident of rape and it is also stated that she being illiterate her husband got her thumb mark on a blank paper and she did not know what was written there. This very fact prima-facie show that the petitioner is out to win over the victim and may indulge in wining the witnesses and interfere with the investigation. No case for grant of pre-arrest bail is made out. Dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) 16.7.2009 JUDGE Reema