CRLMB3234/2010 // 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.3234/2010 Mukesh Chand and Another Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order ::: 14.05.2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri Ali Mohd. Khan, Counsel for petitioners Shri Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material made available to me during the arguments of the case. Petitioners have filed this application for grant of bail under Section 439, Cr.P.C. Petitioners were accused of committing offence under Sections 457 and 380 IPC. Learned counsel for petitioners submitted that petitioners were arrested on 23.02.2010 and that they were made accused in three different First Information Reports, which were respectively lodged on 29.01.2010, 19.02.2010 and 14.02.2010. Petitioners have already been enlarged on bail in one first information report by the trial court and in another by this Court in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.3577/2010 by order dated 12.05.2010. Recovery at the instance of petitioners has already been made in the present case and challan has already been filed in the matter; petitioners have falsely been made accused in these series of cases at one go. Except these matters, there is no other criminal case registered against them; they are in jail since 23.02.2010 and that no useful purpose will be served in case they are kept behind the bards; they would undertake not CRLMB3234/2010 // 2 // to repeat any such offence. After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on its merits and demerits, I deem it just and proper to release the accused-petitioners, namely, (1) Mukesh Chand Son of Nanga Ram and (2) Sita Ram Son of Shri Chand on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C., in FIR No.22/2010, Police Station Kherthal, District Alwar, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the trial court for their appearance on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. However, in case petitioners are found involved in repeating the similar offence at any point of time the prosecution will be at liberty to apply for cancellation of their bail. The bail application stands disposed of. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. //Jaiman//