WPCRL No.602/09 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. (Delay Condn. Appln. No.9612/09) Mr. J.S. Virk, Adv. for the petitioners. Sri M.A. Khan, learned brief holder for the State. Perused the delay condonation application supported by affidavit. Delay in filing the counter affidavit is condoned. Delay condonation application is accordingly allowed. Learned brief holder makes a statement that after completion of investigation, charge sheet has been filed against the petitioner No.1-Masrur Ahmed. However, the petitioner Nos.2 to 5 namely Makbul Ahmed, Hazi Sakrulla, Hazi Raseed and Hazi Faruk have not been charge sheeted as no prima facie evidence has been collected against them. Averment to this effect has been made in paragraph no.2 of the counter affidavit filed by the I.O. In view of the above development, the writ petition has now become infructuous. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous with the observation that interim order dated 06.07.2009 passed by this Court shall continue till the police report is received by the court concerned. (D.V., J.) 09.11.2009 Rajeev Dang