IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 21ST JULY 2011 / 30TH ASHADHA 1933 OP(C).No. 2349 of 2011(O) ------------------------- OS.234/1995 of ADDL.SUB COURT, PALAKKAD .................... PETITIONER: -------------------- RUGMANI, W/O.MADHAVAN, KARAKKUTTUPURAKKAL, OLASSERY AMSOM, PALAKKAD TALUK BY ADV. SRI.K.RAMESH SMT.LAKSHMI RAJAN RESPONDENTS: -------------------------- 1. PARVATHY,D/O.PONNUCHAMY, KARAKKATTUPURAKKAL, OLASSERY AMSOM, PALAKKAD TALUK – 678 001 2. RAVEENDRAN, S/O.PARVATHY, KARAKKATTUPURAKKAL, OLASSERY AMSOM,PALAKKAD TALUK – 678 001 THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: OP(C).No. 2349 of 2011 APPENDIX: PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN O.S. 234/1995. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE PRELIMINARY DECREE DATED 30.10.1999 IN 234/1995. EXT.P3: TURE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED IN I.A. 506/2001. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. TRUE COPY P.S. TO JUDGE. Kp/ THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J. ==================================== O.P(C) No.2349 of 2011 ==================================== Dated this the 21st day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T Plaintiff in O.S. No.234 of 1995 of the court of learned Sub Judge, Palakkad is the petitioner before me seeking a direction to the learned Sub Judge for early disposal of the final decree proceedings. It is stated that a preliminary decree was passed on 30.10.1999 and I.A. No.506 of 2011 was filed for passing final decree, in the year 2001. The Advocate Commissioner submitted report and plan against which petitioner preferred Ext.P3, objection. Grievance of petitioner is that even after 12 years of passing the preliminary decree, final decree proceeding has not progressed much and hence this petition for a direction. Learned counsel submitted that in view of Ext.P3, objection report of the Commissioner is to be remitted for fresh report and plan. 2. Probably such steps must have delayed passing of the final decree. Several objections may come up in an application for passing of final decree, be it to the report and plan of the Commissioner or on any other matter. In such a situation no O.P(C) No.2349 of 2011 -: 2 :- direction for any time bound disposal of the final decree proceeding could be issued. But proceeding has to progress. Hence the learned Sub Judge shall make every endeavour to complete the final decree proceeding as early as possible, after necessary steps are taken and completed. Original Petition is disposed of with the above direction. THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE. vsv