IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16393 of 2009 RAMSHANKAR SINGH YADAV & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 06-10-2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a police case under Sections 406, 407,420,506,504 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The defence is of denial that they were drivers of the trucks in question. The allegations are that the informant loaded the rice on the trucks being driven by the two petitioners named in the F.I.R. and in the way his contact was with them through Mobile phones, number of which are available in the F.I.R. . Thereafter, the mobile phones were switched off and the materials loaded on the trucks were misappropriated. Learned counsel for the State fairly submits that the case diary received contains no materials with regard to any investigation about the mobile phones available with the petitioners, on which the informant has stated in the F.I.R. to be in communication with them. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected. NKS/- ( Navin Sinha, J)