IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5433 of 2009 1. SANTOSH ROY 2. Sunil Roy @ Sunil Kr. Roy Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 22.5.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Counsel for the State. Learned Counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary correction in the cause title with regard to the parentage of the petitioner nos.1 and 2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a police case under Sections 341,342,504,506,307 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the informant is the victim on whom the acid was thrown naming the petitioners as co-accused in the FIR itself, this Court is not satisfied that present is a fit case for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail. The application is rejected. (Navin Sinha,J.) A.Kumar