IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42598 of 2010 1. BHOLA SINGH 2. UPENDRA SINGH 3. ASHOK SINGH @ GHUTWAR SINGH 4. MANOJ SINGH @ MUTO SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----- 02. 04.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the state. Abuse in name of informant’s caste is more relevant in anticipatory bail, but there is no specification as who among petitioners abused the complainant in name of caste to humiliate him. Theft is said ornamental along with other allegations only to press petitioners to not depose in Nawada P. S. Case No.18 of 2009. Further submission of the learned counsel for petitioners is that otherwise also while the matter was enquired incident was found false by the police. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Complaint Case no.450C of 2007, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P. C. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)