IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13234 of 2006 Between: Smt.Shamshad Begum ... PETITIONER a n d The APIIC Limited, Parishram Bhavan, Hyderabad rep. by its Managing Director and another … RESPONDENTS ORDER: When the writ petition came up for hearing on 04-6-2010 there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, it was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It indicates that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing this writ petition. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________________ B. SESHASAYANA REDDY, J June 28, 2010. PN THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13234 of 2006 June 28, 2010