CD C/{g 7w7/\ $mg¥a $am§w N T E HIGH COURT OF CHI-IATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No.‘ (Wré; OF 2011 PETITIONER / Sukhdeo Ram Chauhan S/o Shri M.R. Chouhan, aged about 55 years, occupation service as a Head Clerk(Accountant) , posted Ofiice of the Municipal Council Jashpur Nagar, District Jashpur Nagar (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Rural and Administration Development Department, D. K. S. Building Raipur, District— Raipur, (C.G.). The Commissioner, Directorate of Urban Administration and Development , Raipur (CG). he Joint Director, Urban ' Administration and Development , Reg'onal Office, Bilaspur (CG). Chief Municipal Officer; Nagar Palika Parishad ’ Jashpur (CG). Chief Municipal Ofiicer, Nagar Panchayat Jharkhand District Korea (CG). WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSITITUTION OF INDIA T “ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 1876 of2011 WRIT PE’HTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satisll K. Agnihotl'i, J. Present: Shn' Awadh ’I‘ripathi. Advocate for the petitioner. Shn‘ Ajit Singh, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No‘l to 3. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 27‘ day of April, 2011) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on PETITIONER : Sukhdeo Ram Chauhan. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. merits at this stage. However, the respondents may be directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 18.03.2011 (Annexure P/3), which is pending consideration before the respondent authorities. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the State/respondent No. 1 to 3 submits that if the representation of the petitioner is pending consideration, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously. 3. Accordingly, the respondent No. 1 is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, as aforestated, on its own merits and perspective, in accordance with law, at the earliest. 4. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. WW- ....,,,M- w ~ Sd/- Agnihotri Amit Satish K. Judge