IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1741 of 2008 MAHENDRA RAI, son of Late Badri Rai, resident of Village Purwari Bhelari, Post-Bhelari, P.S. Dinara, District Rohtas, at present residing at New Area, P.O. + P.S. Sasaram, District Rohtas. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, Patna through its Secretary, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 2. The Director Personnel, Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna. 3. The Director (Expenditure), Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna. 4. The General Manager, Magadh Electricity Supply Area, Gaya. 5. The Deputy Director of Accounts, Magadh Electricity Supply Area, Gaya. 6. The Superintending Engineer, Electric Supply Circle, Sasaram. 7. The Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Sub-Division, Beda at Sasaram. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 13.5.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-Board. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that although the payments have been made as indicated in paragraph 3 of the counter affidavit, but the petitioner has not been paid the full amount since some recovery was made, which was not permissible. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Board submits that the grievances of the petitioner shall be considered as per law at the earliest. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his grievances as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to represent his grievances before the Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Sub-Division, Beda at Sasaram (respondent no.7), with a copy 2 to the General Manager, Magadh Electricity Supply Area, Gaya (respondent no.4). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of the unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled. Upon consideration, if the representation of the petitioner is allowed, the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)