IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT^ILASPUR W^RIT PETITION (227) No. ^|2-^ / 2010 PETITIONER ^4S=^^>°lE.ll-A(Et 1 <- R.N( :^v Dayalu Mirdha, Son of Tokel Mirdha, aged 45 years, Occupation Agriculturist, R/o. Village Village Ektal, Tahsil Pusour, District Raigarh (C.G.), VERSUS 1. rShri Jagannath Mandir Ektal, Through : Munlram Patel Son of Shambhu Rain Patel, aged 66 years, Occupation Agriculturist, President Shri Jagannath Mandir //.t? ?'o-":"".:''rf""C^,i'...^"AefrA' Seva Samitee Village Ektal, Tahsil Pusour, District Raigarh (C.G.), RESPONDENTS fa^-ffc^-h MO, ^ •a- ^^^^2 2. a >e4-<s-r\ of&A/i—^o^5^ 3, s Shravan Kumar Hota Son of Kalachand Hota, aged 56 years, Occupation Agriculturist, Secretary, Shri Jagannath Mandir Seva Samitee Village Ektal, Tahsil Pusour, District Raigarh (C.G.), Smt. Manjulata Sinha, wife of Kamlesh Prasad Sinha, aged 52 years, R/o. Chhote Afarmuda, Raigarh, Tahsil and District Raigarh (C.G.), H P9 £>eJ^ol&^-i^b a, ^i&^e^c^e/u-A^^ ^ ,fi ^..vi a.S.St^^'^ ,« si<4'~...^.*'"y f^^^ v-^^^ '^-^ 4. Balkishan Kedia Son of Jagdish Prasad Kelia, aged 43 years, R/o. Savitri Nagar Kotara Road, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 5. Suresh Kumar Agrawal Son of Tuhi Ram Agrawal, aged 48 years, R/o. Village Jagatpur, Raigarh, Tahsil and District Raigarh (C.G.), Aic £ 6. Anil Kumar Agrawal, Son of Mohan Lal Agrawal, aged 32 years, R/o. Gourishankar Mandir Road, Raigarh, Tahsil and District Raigarh (C.G.) 7. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.), WRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLES 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA B?—? T '75E[ ^iiqid^, ®Tlly<IG,fsldiyy ^.t..^2.te;..^..l^.|..h.. gn^t 'v^; (icit3^<\CT) 311^1 ^t l4-<ii* ^sn 3?i^'9i s)*ii<ft <lill(<'l<il'f ^nvS ^^zt <?"!«;!< ^aiRnan^i SB:lIon'Me Shri Pi-ashant KuinartMishra, J 5.10.2010 v^ Smt. Hannda Siddiqui, counse) Shri R.R. Sinha, PL for the Sta( forthe petitioner. The order under challenge in leamed District Judge to allow the Rule 8 of CPC granting pennissiot capacity. Leamed counsel for the permission is not grantedfhe suit is In view of the above, the amenable to the revisional jurisdictic|n CPC. Leamed counsel for the petiticjn petition with liberty to file a duly 115ofCPC. Permission to withdraw the aforesaid. Writ petition is dismissed as Certified copy of the impugijie counsel forthe petitioneron supplyin^ [this writ petition was passed by the alaintiIFs application under Order 1 [i to file the suit ia representative pelptioner would submit that if such re|quired to be dismissed. jirder impugned in this petition is stic|n ofthis court under section 115 of itic|ner prays for withdrawal ofthe writ cojistituted civil revision under section •w^t petition is granted with the libert^' withdrawn. impugijied order shall be retumed to the xerox copy ofthe impugned ordw. Sd//- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge 5!re<ti«lilta55»ITS!',r!.g.r'<nH—FS/147—2.'20IB—1,00,000.