IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.1915-M of 2011 Date of Decision:10.3.2011 Dipti @ Kajal Gupta .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Vikram Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying for entrustment of the investigation into complaint/representation dated 14.12.2010 (Annexure P-4) lodged by the petitioner against Vishal Gupta son of Ramesh Gupta, Ramesh Gupta son of Kishan Chand Gupta and one Dr. Bharti Dhawan residing at House No.1-A/1 opposite Police Station Vijay Nagar Wali Gali, Vijay Nagar, Batala Road, Amritsar to an independent agency like the Crime Branch. Reply by way of affidavit of Dr. Rahul S. IPS, Assistant Commissioner of Police East, Amritsar City, has been filed on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4. In para 3 of the Preliminary Objections, it is stated that Commissioner of Police, Amritsar City-respondent No.4 constituted a committed vide his order dated 10.12.2010 consisting of Sh. Satpal Joshi PPS, ADCP-City-I, Sh. Rahul S. IPS, ACP East Amritsar and Inspector Kanwaldeep Kaur, SHO, Women Police Station, Amritsar to counsel the couple and to re-verify the facts of the complaint. The committee after Crl. M. No.1915-M of 2011 -2- inquiry sent its report that the offence under Sections 406,498-A IPC is made out against Vishal Gupta and his father Ramesh Gupta (husband and father-in-law, respectively of the petitioner) and that no matter has come to notice regarding forcible abortion been conducted by Dr. Bharti Dhawan. Accordingly, a case FIR No.47 dated 16.2.2011 under Sections 406,498-A IPC has been registered against the accused at Police Station A-Division, Amritsar. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 10.3.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE