HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITON No.3685 OF 2010 ORDER: This revision is filed against the order dated 16-07-2010 passed by the learned District Judge, Adilabad in E.P. No.18 of 2009 in Pre- Litigation Case No.18 of 2008. 2. Respondent is the owner of a Godown at Adilabad and it was leased out to the petitioner on payment of a lump sum amount of Rs.2,00,000/-. Respondent approached the District Legal Services Authority complaining that the petitioner is not vacating the premises, though he is willing to refund the amount of Rs.2,00,000/-. It was in the context of a proposal for sale of the premises. The Legal Services Authority / Lok Adalat issued notice to the petitioner and after undertaking mediation between both of them, had passed an award dated 07-07-2008. According to this, the petitioner was entitled to remain in premises upto 23-09-2009 and the respondent was to refund the amount of Rs.2,00,000/- by that date. 3. Alleging that the petitioner did not honour the award, respondent filed E.P. No.18 of 2009. The learned District Judge issued notice to the petitioner and passed the order under revision. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. The E.P. did not arise out of any regular proceedings. On the other hand, it is filed for enforcement of a settlement / award, which came into existence with the consent of the parties. Petitioner does not dispute that he is under obligation to vacate the premises by 23-09-2009. The only ground urged by him is that few days earlier to that date the respondent sold the property. That hardly makes any difference for him, in the context of vacating the premises. The allegation that the respondent did not refund the amount was repelled by making a reference to the Demand Draft prepared by the respondent for a sum of Rs.2,00,000/-and sending the same to the petitioner. Viewed from any angle, this Court does not find any basis to interfere with the order under revision. 6. Hence, the Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits the petitioner would remove the material in the Godown within two (2) weeks. It is directed that in case the petitioner files an undertaking before the Executing Court to the effect that he would vacate the premises on or before 15-09-2010 and deposits a sum of Rs.5,000/-, he shall be entitled to remove the material within two (2) weeks. The respondent shall be entitled to withdraw the deposited amount. ____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J August 27, 2010. KTL Issue cc in one week.