: 1 : USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.1666 OF 2009 Dr. Sonal Shah .. Plaintiff V/s. Shashank G. Shah .. Defendant ..... Mrs. Laxmi Murli i/by Laxmi Murli & Associates for the plaintiff Ms. Shilpa Jadhav for the defendant ..... CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 29th SEPTEMBER, 2009. P.C. : 1. It is stated that the plaintiff and the defendant are present in the Court. They are brother and sister. They tendered consent terms duly signed by them and their advocates stating therein that the fixed deposit receipt of their late father shall now belong exclusively to the defendant and he will be entitled to the benefit of the sums thereunder alongwith the accrued interest. The plaintiff sister has no objection if the FDR is encashed by the brother and the amounts are released to him. Since they are brother and sister and having mutually settled their disputes, there is no : 2 : impediment in taking the terms on record and passing an order accordingly. The consent terms are taken on record and marked as "X" for identification. 2. The suit is decreed in terms of the Consent Terms with no order as to costs. The plaintiff would be entitled to refund of court fees as per rules. Notice of Motion does not survive in the light of the consent terms tendered and disposal of the suit. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)