IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 13TH DECEMBER 2010 / 22ND AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 37025 of 2010(C) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- SATHEESH KUMAR, AGED 22, S/O.APPU, THANIKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, PONMUNDAM P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.K.RAVI (PARIYARATH) RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695 001. 2. THE PONMUNDAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, PONMUNDAM P.O., MALAPPURAM – 676 505. 3. THE TOWN PLANNER, MALAPPURAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT – 676 505. 4. THE PONMUNDAM SERVICE CO-OP. BANK, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, PONMUNDAM P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT – 676 505. R1 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSHKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs/ ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 37025 OF 2010 ===================== Dated this the 13th day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T What is complained of by the petitioner is inaction of the 2nd respondent on Ext.P5, a complaint made by the petitioner alleging that the 4th respondent has illegally constructed a building. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, such a complaint has been received and is pending, it is directed that the 2nd respondent shall take appropriate action on the complaint with notice to the parties concerned and in accordance with law. Action should be taken as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 8 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the contentions raised and it is entirely for the 2nd respondent to deal with the matter. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp