CRM No. M 30513 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 30513 of 2010 Date of decision: 23.02.2011 Sukhdeep Kaur and another ........ Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. B S Saroha, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for issuance of direction to respondents No. 1 to 3 to protect and lives, liberty and limbs of both the petitioners and to provide adequate security against the threatened and apprehended acts of atrocities and threats of respondents No. 4 to 6 who are bent upon eliminating both the petitioners by murdering them. Vide order dated 13.10.2010, an interim direction was issued that the petitioners will not be taken into custody forcibly by the police on the complaint of private respondents alleging that petitioner No. 1 has kidnapped or abducted petitioner No. 2. Reply by way of affidavit of Sarabjit Singh, Additional Deputy CRM No. M 30513 of 2010 2 Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar has been filed in Court today. The same is taken on record. As per the said reply, statements of the petitioners and the parents of petitioner No. 1 have been recorded, wherein, they have stated that they have no objection to the said marriage. In view of the aforesaid statements, it is apparent that there is no threat perceptions and accordingly, the present petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous. Dismissed as having become infructuous. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 23.02.2011 mohan