Petilioners Respodente HIGH CCTJRT OF CHHAmSGARH.BIU^PUR Writ PetiUon (0 No. 5189 of 2007 1) Udao Raj Psffatch, son of Shri Mangal Chand Parakh, aged about 50 years, occupation - Business, resklent of G.E.O. Road, Rajnandgaon. 2) Ashok Parakh, son of Late Laxmichand Parakh, aged about 55 years, occupation - Business, resident of G.E.O. Road, Rajnandgaon (CG). Versus 1) State of Chhattegarh, through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. 2) The Collector, Rajnandgaon. 3) The Tehaldar, Rajnandgaon/ 4) The Nazul Officer, Rajnandgaan. 5) Municipal Corporation, Rajnandgaon Ihrough its Commissioner. 6) The Commissioner, Munlcipal Corporation, Rqnandgaon. (Writ PeBtion uncter Arfcle 226 ofthe Constlhrtion of India) SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present Shri RajeevShrivastawa,counselforthepetitioner. Shri Suryakant Mishra, Panel Lawyer for Uie respondents No. 1 to 4/State. ORDER (Passed on 27th August, 2007) . Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits ttiat ttie respondent No. 21 Colledor, Rajnandgaon, vide orcter dated 13-12-2005 (Annexure P/12) directed the Tahsildar, Rajnandgaon and the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Rajnandgaon, to setUe the landtess persons in Pandit Dindayat Upadhyay Nagar Chikhli. Kanchanbagh, houses constructed under Valmiki-Ambedkar Awas Scheme. Leamed coureel fiirttisr submits ttiat despNe the clear order passed by the Colledor, Rajnandgaon on 13-12-2005 (Annexure P/12), no action has been taken by ttie authorities, till (tate. Thereafter, ttie petifioner has moved a representation to Uie Coltector, Rajnandgawi, on 18-7-2TO7 (Annexure P/13), who in tum has nc* taken any steps to ensure compliaro®of the earlier order dated 13-12-20(ffi. The representaUon is pending undecided till date. 2) lnviewoftheforegoing,teamedcounselappeartngforthepetitioners submits at the pettUoners do not wart to press olher pomts, except Ihat ttie responctent No.2/Collector, Rajnandgaon, be directed to considw and decide their representatton dated 18-7-2007 (Annexure P/13) expedittously, in accordance wilh \3M, to ensure compliance ofthe order dated 13-12-2005, to which leamed counsel appearing for ihe re^iondents No. 1 to 4/Sta*e has no objectton. 3) It is ordered accordingly. 4) The respondent No.2/Collector, Rajnandgaon, is directed to consider and deckte the representation dated 18-7-2007 (Annexure P/13) of 8ie petiBoners to ensure compliance of fte order dated 13-12-2(XK eiqiedifiousty, in accordance with law, as ^rty as posabte preferabtywHftin a period oftwo months from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order, Sausb^ Jud&e raju -••? D' ^—