^ £NTH®HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (2271 No.^l^ /2009 §gng|©Ben@h- PBTITIONBR iA ^^7^^ Anil Kumar Sahu S/o Shri. Ram Sevak Sahu Aged about 30 years Occupation Business, Residence of Manipur (Ambikapur) P.S. and Tahsil - Ambikapur District Surguja Chhattisgarh VERSUS 1. Srat. Rampyari Devi W/o Late Chamaru Sao Aged about 55 years 2. Umesh Kumar Gupta S/o Late Chamaru Sao Aged about 28 years 3. Paras Kumar Gupta S/o Late Chamaru Sao Aged about 24 years All R/o Sadar Road Ambikapur P.S. and Tahsil - Ambikapur District Surguja Chhattisgarh 4. Sub-Divisional Officer Ambikapur District - Surguja Chhattisgarh 5. Collector Surguja Ambikapur District - Surguja Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDBR ARTSCLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUT20H OF SNDIA ^^ ^H^l^T^TNF 'TOT ^TT^l sh*ii<sr> -3-^[ ^S^H^, ^Tll^^^/ f^^ffyy . '^ • ^ c^),^?,^.{OZ^l i?raBrw5rw"""'''"^"""""'"""""""""""""/^^ea 3T(^F <q^T ("^t^^^) ^HW^rfN^T^T S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Aaanwal 04-09-2009 Shri Bhupendra Sinjgh, coi^nsel for the petjtioner. Heard on admission. Brief facts according to th^ moved an appljcatlon before the granted in favour of the petitione] been preferred by the responder No.4. The petjtioner herein fited respondent No. 4 stayed the e Tahsiidar without hearing the pet moved an application for transfer on 24-08-2009 but the Coliector respondents and the petitioner No.4 wiii pass fina! order even witl Learned counsel appearing transfer petition filed by the petiti heard on a fjxed date. ^rafeml^ T(?FRtf <? ^^-^R?R ^"^fm^n^T petitioner are that the petitioner FTahsildar for mutation which was and against that an appeal has }is No. 1 to 3 before respondent caveat. Despite filing of caveat, ijffect and operatjon pf order of :jtloner. Thereafter, the petitjoner of the case before the Coliector |ias not issued any notice to the i^ apprehending that respondent |out hearing the petitioner. for the petitioner prays that the <^ner before the Collector may be Having heard the !earned having perused record, >-- counsel for the petjtioner and >r^N?t^^<^^7II^T< ?—F.S/95—1 1 /2008—1,00,000. 4 "t tt •^. ^ ^^^ 3?i^1 ^T f^?N? ^^? ^I^T^RW Kvr -3-si ^TFTE^PT, ^RFT^, r®l<n!^<j,< P C'LO) ^o. ^O/O^ O^ ^^...-...;....^.....................................^^0__ ^?T ^^(1(^it3si^q) IIT^W^T^^T ^- "^ - !t is directed that resp^ndent petition flled by the petjtioner ex^editjousiy Its own merits In accordanc^ preferably within a period ofthre|e With the above directlon, Certified copy as per rule^. Dne ^rafe^N ^pRTf-if fs^-^R?n ^T3?RR3??^? No.5 to hear the transfer and decide the same on with law as early as possible months. petitjon is disposed of. Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge ^TUN^ ^^ ^irc^K^Rt^t^—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000.