IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No.6436 of 2006 Between: S.C. & S.T. Association of Jamal Health Educational- Foundation MPHW (F) Training Institute, Kurichedu Road, Darsi, Prakasam District, Rep by its President, M.Visranthamma. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Secretary to Government, Social Welfare Department, Govt of A.P., Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Social Welfare, Govt of A.P., Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 3 The Deputy Director, Social Welfare Department, Ongole, at Prakasam District. 4 The Principal, Jamal Health Educational Foundation - MPHW (F), Training Institute, Kurichedu Road, Darsi, Prakasam District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 3 in not sanctioning the mess charges and tuition fee as applicable to the free seat quota and the other compulsory fees to the petitioner association during the financial year of 2004-2005 and the tuition fee dues under management quota may be paid after decision on the report to be submitted by the Enquiry Officer, appointed in general by the 1st respondent, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 to sanction the mess charges and tuition fee as applicable to the free seat quota and other compulsory fees to the petitioner's association, and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.VADDI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE Counsel for the Respondent No.4: The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No.6436 of 2006 ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner addressed a letter, dated 22.12.2008, to the Registry stating that the petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition. In the light of the said letter, this writ petition is listed under the caption “for withdrawal”. Permission is accorded and the writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J Date:23.12.2008 va