IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 2ND DECEMBER 2010 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 7416 of 2007(G) -------------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- KAIKKARA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, KAITHAVARAM BUNGLOW, KANKATHU MUKKU, KOLLAM, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER A.ABDUL SALAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.B.SURESH KUMAR RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. STEERING COMMITTEE, KERALA STATE TRANSPORT PROJECT(KSTP), REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT), GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. CHIEF ENGINEER(PROJECTS), KERALA STATE TRANSPORT PROJECT, T.C.47/1795, SECOND FLOOR, RAJADHANI COMPLEX, OPPOSITE PRS HOSPITAL, KILLIPPALAM, KARAMANA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KOTTARAKKA DIVISION, KERALA STATE TRANSPORT PROJECT, PULAMON P.O., KOTTARAKKA. WP(C).No. 7416 of 2007 7. THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD., KOLLAM BRANCH, BISHOP JEROME NAGAR, P.B.NO.122, KOLLAM, KERALA-691 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER. SRI.P. NANDAKUMAR - GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR R6 SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE,SC,SOUTH INDIAN BAN FOR R7 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ----------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.7416 OF 2007 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2010 JUDGMENT In this writ petition, notices to respondents 3 and 4 have not been returned after service and notice to the second respondent has been returned unserved with the postal endorsement 'no such addressee'. Despite notification of the defect, the same has not been cured. Therefore, the matter was posted before the Registrar (Judicial) for defects on 15.11.2010. On that day, there was no representation for the petitioner. The defect has also not been cured. That is why the matter is posted before this Court in the defect list today. Today, when the matter was taken up, none appears for the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE acd