1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 236 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2820 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and the Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Coram: Smt. Nishita Mhatre, & Shri M. T. Joshi, JJ. Date : 1st August, 2011 Shri Pradeep Shahane, Adv. for the appellant. Shri S.V. Kurundkar, Addl. G.P. for Resp.State ----------- 1. The appellant has approached this court, contending that the learned Single Judge committed an error by condoning the delay of six years in filing the writ petition. According to the learned Advocate, the award was passed in the year 2004 by the Labour Court in Reference (IDA) No. 3/1989, granting reinstatement with continuity of service. The back wages were denied to the petitioners. 2 2. The learned Single Judge has considered the reasons for approaching the court late and has allowed the writ petition and remanded the matter to the Labour Court for a fresh decision. While doing so, the appellant herein has been awarded costs of Rs.5000/=. 3. In our opinion, there is no need to interfere with the impugned order, in the appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. (M.T. JOSHI, J.) (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.) pnd/lpa236.11