1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4482 OF 2008 Chandra Shekhar Puranchand Pandey .. Petitioner Vs Asha Chandrashekhar Pandey .. Respondent Ms.Kokila Kalra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.T.Lalwani, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 20/07/2009 PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Counsel for the parties have fairly submitted that I need not examine the merits of the order impugned in the present petition and they have agreed for the following arrangement during pendency of the petition for divorce. (i) The respondent-mother shall provide access of the child Kaushik to the petitioner-father at Swadhar, Goregaon, Mumbai, on 1st, 3rd and 5th Saturdays between 11 am and 2 pm. The respondent-mother is directed to take the child to Swadhar, Goregoan, Mumbai for access during the said period. With these directions, the writ petition is disposed T 2 of. (ii)Disposal of this petition shall not preclude the petitioner- father from making an application before the Family Court for overnight access at appropriate stage. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)