& <^ ?0 t?yf'fi ^¥i3ii ^yssSis 'SWSK: 'iSSSti- S'SJgMSf g.ai^sa'a.' 'lff'^KiWiSfSSI ^ vi;s,;s^is^.!a tt^S ^,^. E'T". ir'i'-Ei:;t XI-HC-22 . 3ii^5i'¥i R-ii* sn^CT Sl'iHW ^I?d •'•<£. •TEg^qRrRN, ^Wi^ &<'ti'yi< IIHCITShflra)^j..:c:ss!^e.iS^^& ra'.s .,•'".'' l.:'""^^:"''S;l^:' 200 ?t^8;r" sn^i ^tti#(?ffea 04/05/2006 ShriA.K.. Prasad.leameAcoimsel SlitiR.K^anna.PEfi^State^ ; ; Ifeard mlA. No. tlCf'^2008 ;taken up on Bomd. a Learried eounsetfer flie atfpKcafcft M.GrJ'.No. 967/2006ioFst^ai^taayl atdiestageofadnussiontoday. Praver is riot opposed. M.Cr.P. Nb. 9ff?/2006 isdisnuss< 'Diis revisijOtris heard fimUy f6d4y Tbe appBeant ig^ aggrieved 1y att{i .4t^Addl.Sessmns3udge,DistLl3utsm| aehargeuriderSeetion304Part-I[ofIPi([ The &ctuaTaiatrix in 1»riefis (Rural Slsdtcd Pt'actitjoner of Elscti|o certificate finm tfae coimcU 6f Electro The applieant js tsgistered'in the Electr{ aad also •possesses a degree ofysadya] taking treattnent fi-om the ^tplicant &r| Gupta, ^companied by'her mofte applicant liw treattnent siaee^tte applieant were nttt ^sporidmg'3nd>slii evemng. IBe appllcant ^ adnuaistered injections of antibiotic iffii(g &r fhe^plicatft. ' ; jspondeiit. - - fl6r ingent lisaing. The;lnatfer w submits ftat hc does aot Kress ^ thatlllis Tevisifln be heantfinaBy .cn)A(I<n*ft't ^i^'c'iT^ f^l<0^fa)'^l< it:3ifign3ii^?i -^ :^'' that ^dasnotipressed. i ' • atjhe stage ofadmissioa. totderdated3.43QQ6pasSBd1iyAe ISrasuUis^TridNo. '6/2005 whereby was &amed;aganist fl»aCTlicart. tte ^ipUcant Js ai iR.M.P.iE.H Hotneop^y) 'and, possess^' a flomeopatluct SystemOf Kfedicmfi; IIofflef^iafliic systMitoEMediciae harad.,Afis:StiyamaGuptewaa SfeveR'CW 7.10.2003, ^&s.-Slyana n-law went td the elaiic^of liifi being adnuaistered t>y ^lfae ^wulA get &vw. everyday i the Sliyan»''0uptaat'tte cBnjfr and ig Cqaufloxairi and:Gartica Steri^. meilieines •^- ;/.-: ••: .. ^":~ ' i[ m •i' ^T; (gtiiBrf- ENat T N 'i -XI-HC-22 : '3^"*<W1d'll,LaStwi<«;:R<<'1iu1<. 3n^?T:'.Tg5r^':,:.\:,.; •:.:':: ;^ .M^.'^.^^'3-&Q'^ """"'"Wl.^ 20fr: •1^SI—••••••"•'—--"• t<l*«tTst)lll°h ,...SK sn^rqn 'f^'ira'aii^i ?h*4lch Alf^T .an^ff ^iiwsltff drug Dexatnelhasone Phgspatt. Sooft: Shyama Gupta deteriorated; Th& appVi hugband Om-PritaA; Grlgita ntfpnnmgffii at the clinic after he had adnuiiustered ai ^lt' ctiniltucted Qm Prakash Gapta rudied Fie thft cl M-si. Shyanaa Gupta1oftie;Revival. (lOGtorproclaunedlier^ead.F.I.R.was day at 9.10 p.m. Post mortem was couldnotgive;anydefimteopim6&^1o Gvpta. Viscera and skin fl^ps w»ei»re IBsto Paffldlo^cal exgaunatipn. Oahei^ FSL, fheSeniorScientificOfGceroftitei ^ stda flap contained Gortico' Steroid dru| opmed&at Ihe injections^Tinge antf^ svringe contained antibiotic Cijri-ofioxamf poison. Jlie eertifieate of registfatKn ijl -Medicine as also %e eertificafe of RJ[ Visharad were seized fism the %plicant.| the applicant w^ pioseimted uhdCT^^^S Judge after.consideringllieinaterial i eharge under Secttcui 3j04 Part-ITH'C'agaj Siiri A.K. Prasad, learhed etnmset mipugiwttprder cmlfae^gKnuidffiat^eveiit; ;tlre prosecutiori is aceepted at its face:va^i6 faeie a caseim^er Seetion 304iS>a't-II:;| CMitendedlhattteaRplieantwasa; -^. =niit<n«II-i'Hl»ii'ff.^'{sistTNigH! ^^3(fsWl 311^T. ' 1hereaiNa"» Ae (A^tion of Mfrs. ^aatyntmediateifr telepteneA^ter }t s. Slgama Gtqrtaliad^nrted injectioa and put tees ?cui a^ dtip- i|(ue^^(rf Ifte appHcant; and toofe BEEnrie a a rickshaw whsre the tidged at P.S, Chavni«(tesanie bV a;team ofyoctots who |he causi? ofdeafeofltAs.Shyana ^ :':': '.:.•' -'-• :^.::~ Iserved^ fiM^chemical^ anidysis and sent fbr'ehemicat analysis1o the |Stafel!'SK, Raipin- opmied flurt the <Dexame)hasone.^ K 'was fiirdieir empty toftte anff Ae disposdriff ;and didnot cohtain any ehenucal EIectro Hpmeopathic System of LP.EJI and a degre^ of Vadya. ^Afte68mpletKMafinwestigatkMt, tioa 304 IPC. The leamed Irial Ihe prosecuttoa'fi-amefta nst1hcapplicalt._ fortRe appHcaithaswsailedflte iftts entire matenal.prpduced by iie,Jitwouldnot-revBat'evenj>rima if IPG against ttie applieant.^ He PraetittohM'and^was'' gtoijuced^ ;z '^•-tiBsa :.f^£:i8BI ia-Hc-22 vsi'^fPVvfV, .»flHi'i<o,'I«tfiiy>i< sii^r^T 'fN^sn^i s^^l<^ ^fft^ ^i -(.. •^ entitled to keep and adminislet and registoation as an R.M.T.E Vs. State ofPuniab andanothel decision rendered by dus C< 'll ChhattisfdrKiiepotted in 2 fhe autopsy report di3 not .exp deatfa and the report ofthe T'i poisunjn tiie (frugs aiiimitusteri It wa& submitted that at the ffle coul&primafacie reveal a cass applicant, On fhe other Uand, Lawyer fpr State argued in supj iiaat theapplieant was notauttK Having considered. th| docunients produced by ffie F.I.R. lodged by Om Prakash- alreddy takmg treatoent for Annexure A-2 and A-3 .also Vaidya Visharad and was als) certiScate from the councif fcj] fqr practicing Electro Hotriec|| Apex Court has m cririmial MedicalPractltioneriseatitle4 degree and registratiQn. Ther< thaf flie meilicines adffianistMls t^'l could have causedthe death pxptess q')|<4[<?l4ll W^f ^ I^Si' Tbi'^R i? 3nPOT .311^1 ,' laU'opattiicme^iciaesByvirtuebflrisdeg-ee |H. Reliance was plaeed on./acoSMdffiew |reporteilin2005 C&C'r.J. 294 iplC)anda <urt in Dr. .4run Dewcmsan Vs. State_^ IGG. Cr. J. 92. Kwas alsocontended^iat any definite optoion as to ffie tisuse 6f also revealed fliat Ifaere was no chetnical ^d by fhe appUcaut to Mrs. Shayana Qupta. (st ttie materiat prbducedby^hff prosecutuni under Section 304-A offhe IPC agamst fte SJu-i Rama Krislma Shaima, leamed Panel »rtoftheinapugnedorderwMlecontending ^rizedto adriumsterallopallucmedicme. rival submissions, I have perused ffie Flrosecution urider Section 173 Cr.P.C. - The pupta resveals diat Mrs. Shyamd Gupta was \ fever fi-om fhe awUcant. The documCTte shpw fhat fhe applicant holds a degfeedf Tegistered as'R.M.P.E.H. and possessed a ^Eleetro Homeopathtc System of Medicine latfiy;. Annexure A-4 also ?hows fhat •fee CTiealNd. 369/1994 liadlhataRe^stered tb.keep AllopatKic medicine byvirtue cTlas is alKOtutety aoimaterialonrecordtoshBW sd;!t>y ffie applicant t6 3Mrs. ^Shyama'Giqrta^ rf Mrs. Shyama Gupta. There is no u c^^ -'iiiffis •3S ::!; 'yiKii XI-HC-22 '3^q|'-IN^,^®fll'a'i<»,-(°'(''l*<a<. .sn^iqii, l<-fi<t> SIl^T. wiwgrea ^ ^ ^ -A^A/- • HWCT! SBtliqi fSre^s' \ sn^i'TOiiw^to opinion pn reeord-tQ that affect. A^itopsy repart alsp does not es^reSi aBy Ktefinite opinion about ^e causft of •thatjfaere.isiu) chenueal poison in ^ id Mrs. Shvama Gupta. , •Brom^flie material CiprDflb^mto.Mrs.ShyamaQupta, was Ekely to cause her dealfa. In Ih^ . be said- .fliat Ihc applicant •eias^i savmg drug a&d adnuaistered as ^ , '^I^lI<T1'4l'( TTR^i! ^ fa'^l ^^K / ^; aipgq.sn^t 'death. 'I'hs rqiort-efFSE also stiS%ys he^arugs^idmnusteTed;by thejqiplicant ^llieprosecution.iteatinotfeesaidtfaat '"•^Hw.f&^ ' „ : / '-'^^ ; '/:'/'1 . while aAiunistenng Gortico^ dn^ < an3 ^flie antibiotic J injectuwl af theappBcaathadthelmowle^ettiattt [t"view oftiie matter, it caa, gt tfie niogt, egli^nt ia adnBaistarmg 1tie abows meationed drugs to MM; Shyama<^upta< A Co^ [i?S.O.S to ^save ihe life.bf'ii smking patient. Mrs. Shyania Crupta was apmmistered fhe Cq)rofloxam< antibiptie mjectiori by ttie appeUant withoui m and eircumstances ofthecase and o ^ Ifae prosecudoa,. I am of ffie con8tde|ced bpiniffln that no .case imder Section 304 Fart-Q exists even^nma^Bcre ^gairist flie appUeant. However, a cMe nnder Section 304-A tifthe IPC W ^a'CiftSeen agaiilsttfieappeUantm:flu^case. For the aforesaid leasons, it inaaifestly eiioneous and cohtrary exercise oftiiereyisionaljurisdietio^ In flie fesult, this criminal re' , Section 304 Part-H ffC framed a^ Judgeon 3.4.2006 isset aside, The dertaking a sensitivijy test' fii ifae facts [ithebasuoffhematerialproducedby causing death by ne^igence w prima san be jsairf that flfe'nnpugned OfderjS ti) law atld caUs for interference in riskui ispartlyallowed. Ghatgenhdsr, iast Ae applicant by flie leamed <nal .eamedteialJudgesIiaU&ameaChai^e under Sectifm 304-A IPG agamsftllie ^pplicant andtitfteafier pi-oceeBl ia accordanBe wifh law. - ' • '\i Sd-/ • DUip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge r^fcTQ(/STCS3£^=^