1 S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.3731/2006 Date : 07.09.2006 HON'BLE MR.SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. Ramesh Purohit for the applicant. Mr. V.R. Mehta, Public Prosecutor. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the impugned order. The contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that in this case marriage had taken place 20 years ago with the deceased and the reason assigned for committing suicide by the wife is that she had four daughters. According to learned counsel, after such a long period having been passed as husband and wife, allegation of alleged cruelty and demand of dowry against the applicant prima facie cannot be said to be correct. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 2 I have considered the submissions made before me and carefully gone through the material available on record. Case diary in the present case has not been produced inspite of repeated directions given by this Court on 29.8.2006, and 04.09.2006. In view of above, taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the , I feel inclined to enlarge the accused applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that the applicant Devi Lal son of Harnath Jat shall be released on bail in FIR No.52/2006 P.S. Kachhola, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J. vij