IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43614 of 2008 JITENDRA KUMAR SINGH @ JITENDRA KR.SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 4 27.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the complainant and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner though is husband but unable to know the willingness of the complainant wife as what she expects from him. There is no allegation at all that the petitioner earlier to his marriage ever told the complainant about his being a Chattered Accountant and that appears the main allegation. Wife is the only daughter of the advocate father expecting much more than a common people. The District & Sessions Judge, Siwan attempted his best to reconcile the differences but could not succeed but in any case putting the petitioner behind the bar in name of husband, can never be justified. I agree with the submission. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest or - 2 - surrender within one month from today in Complaint Case No. 1056 of 2008, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI