HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CRIMINAL PETITION NO.11899 OF 2010 ORDER: 1. Petitioner-Accused No.5 and respondent No.2-defacto complainant and respondent No.3 are present. 2. Sri A. Ravinder, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Bhavani Shankar, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are also present. 3. It is stated by both the parties that they resolved the dispute amicably outside the Court and entered into a compromise, which is recorded by way of an agreement and a copy of the same is also placed on record. It is further stated that in view of the compromise, respondent No.2-defacto complainant and respondent No.3 addressed a letter to the Sub-Inspector of Police, Bollarum Police Station to withdraw the complaint. 4. As both the parties have settled their dispute outside the Court and entered into a compromise and the respondents 2 and 3 stated that they are no longer interested in prosecuting the petitioner-Accused No.5, it is considered that no useful purpose would be served by continuing the proceedings initiated against the petitioner-Accused No.5 in Crime No. 94 of 2010 of Bollarum Police Station. 5. Hence, by invoking the inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of Cr. P.C., further proceedings against petitioner-Accused No.5 in Crime No.94 of 2010 are liable to be quashed and they are accordingly quashed. The proceedings against the other accused can, however, go on. 6. The Criminal Petition is accordingly disposed of. ____________________ G.V. SEETHAPATHY,J Date: 1st December, 2010 pnb