IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.29 of 2009 SANJEET KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02. 13.11.2009. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was an applicant for the Constable under Advertisement No. 01/2004. It is urged that despite the publication of his name in the list of successful candidates and verification of his documents, the appointment still remained elusive. Counsel for the State rightly submits that the pleadings are too vague and there is no assertion that any person with lesser qualifications and merit than the petitioner has been appointed. Mere selection does not vest a right of appointment. If the petitioner has filed representation as urged on 03.10.2008 let the same be considered by the respondents in the light of the aforesaid discussions and be disposed in accordance with law in a maximum period of five months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed off. U.K. (Navin Sinha,j)