In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. CRM No. M- 8302 of 2009 Decided on:- 12.05.2009 Mainpal ……Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …….Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice K. C. Puri Present Mr. Hitesh Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A. K. Jindal, AAG, Haryana. K. C. Puri, J.(Oral ) As per allegations of the prosecution, the petitioner committed rape upon the prosecutrix aged about 55 years. Doctor has stated that possibility of rape cannot be ruled out. Report of Forensic Science Laboratory says that semen was detected on the peticot of the prosecutrix. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on account of land transaction with one Santosh Yadav by the daughter of the petitioner. He has further contended that age of the prosecutrix is 65 years and not 55 years and there was no question of rape. At the time of grant of bail, prima-facie case is to be seen. Medical evidence corroborates the factum of rape. No ground for grant of bail is made out. Dismissed. May 12, 2009 ( K.C. Puri ) Mamta Judge