THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 4599 OF 2009 Date: 25-09-2009 Between Anisetti Raghava @ Veera Raghava …..Petitioner Anisetti Venkata Surya Subbalakshmi and two others …..Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 4599 OF 2009 ORDER: This revision petition is filed by the petitioner complaining inaction on the part of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Pithapuram in disposing of EASR No. 2580 of 2009 in EP No. 22 of 2007 in O.S No. 174 of 2004. The petition in EASR No. 2580 of 2009 filed by the petitioner under Order 21 Rule 58 CPC has been returned on 30-06-2009 with office objections and on representing the same, on 08-07-2009 it was again returned. The same was again represented on 14-07-2009 and on returning the same, it was again represented on 28-07-2009. Lastly, it was returned on 15-09-2009. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner represented the matter on 18-09-2009 after complying with the objections dated 15-09-2009. If that be the case, the present revision filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is misconceived. The petitioner has to file an application to condone the delay in representation, but instead he has filed the present petition. Therefore, the petitioner cannot complain laches on the part of the Court in disposing of the application under order 21 Rule 58 CPC. The civil revision petition fails and is accordingly dismissed. Needless to say that if the application under Order 21 Rule 58 CPC filed by the petitioner is in order, the lower Court is under obligation to dispose of the same, in accordance with law. A. GOPAL REDDY, J 07-08-2009 ks