[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.1328 OF 2008 Arun Kumar Patil ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.Dinesh Tiwari and Rahul Dhumal Advs. for Applicant Mr.S.S.Pednekar APP for State. Mr.Subhash Jha Advocate i/b Law Global for Original Complainant ... WITH CRIMINAL APPLN.NO. 377 OF 2008 IN CRI.APPLICATION NO. 1328 OF 2008 Arun Kumar Patil ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent And Rakesh Pandurang Gauri ..Intervener ... Mr.Dinesh Tiwari and Rahul Dhumal Advs. for Applicant Mr.S.S.Pednekar APP for State. Mr.Subhash Jha Advocate i/b Law Global for Intervener-Original Complainant ... [-2-] CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JULY 21, 2008 DATE : JULY 21, 2008 DATE : JULY 21, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant-original accused, the learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned advocate for the intervener-original complainant. 2. The applicant has preferred Criminal Application No. 1328 of 2008 in which he is seeking anticipatory bail in CR No.276 (a) of 2007 of Shantinagar Police Station, Bhiwandi Dist.Thane. The said case is under Sections 420 and 468 of IPC. 3. The complainant has preferred Criminal Application No.377 of 2008 wherein it is stated that the settlement has taken place between the complainant and the accused and the complainant has no objection to granting anticipatory bail. The complainant has also stated that he does not wish to proceed with the FIR which he has lodged against the applicant. In view of the above statement, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant. [-3-] 4. In the event of arrest, the applicant-Arun Kumar Patil be released on bail in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rs. twenty five thousand only) with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. 5. Both the applications are disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]