IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Revision No.64 of 2009 M.D. Dhaundiyal ………. Revisionist Versus State of Uttarakhand & another ..…. Respondents Dated: December 1, 2011 Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J. This revision has been directed against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 24.01.2009 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Third), Dehradun in criminal case no.2102 of 2008, State Vs. Sukhpal, whereby the accused Sukhpal was acquitted for the offences punishable under Section 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. It is pertinent to mention here that none has turned up either on behalf of the revisionist or for respondent no.2. However, Sri Nandan Arya, learned AGA for the State is present, so this Court has given hearing to learned AGA and perused the entire material available on the record. On perusal of the judgment and the grounds of revision, it appears that accused Sukhpal was charged for fabricating a receipt which was issued to him for Truck No.UP.07A-9748. The said Truck was indulged in the mining and transporting some minerals. The learned Magistrate, after the conclusion of trial, found that the said receipt was not fabricated by the accused. Besides, there were several contradictions, discrepancies and incongruities in the prosecution version, which were based upon a very weak investigation. So, the 2 learned Magistrate did not find the prosecution case proved up to the hilt and passed the order of acquittal, as above. The grounds of revision are also very stereotyped and do not have any substance. Even the same have been drafted in a very routine and casual manner. So, this revision is bereft of any merit and liable to be dismissed. It is, accordingly, dismissed. Lower court remitted be sent back. (Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.) 01.12.2011 Rajeev Dang