€.é*\ GasZ/ ®/ writ. Ration &; 36> ' M 9ETI?¢(DHER 3 DWARIKA PRMizkf) WWWY. 3/0. $hri Rani Ram mondhary. “apper Divisicn ‘read'xer. hsted ab/esovt. aigher Swomiary schoal, matami. Block Dabhara. District Janjgeexba‘hampa (cued , n .- VQFW$ v s (1) state o£‘mhattisgarh. 'rhraugh Secretary, sduool Eéucaticn Departmant, Mantra). aya . D -K.BhaWan . I Raipur . Chhattisgarh. (2) Director , School Eduaation Departmmta Permian Bada. Raipar. c.G. (33 Distriét Education ®f£icexu Janjgeex~ mampa (wattisgarh ) . WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 0? CONSTIW’I‘IGN OF INDIA IN W HIW OOIRT 03' QiiiATTI$GM¥i JUDIQATURE AT BIIA3PUR HQGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT ELASPUR SWGLE EENCH : HéNSELE MR. SKfiSH K. K§NIH®T§i .3. WRIT PETITION NO.3622 OF 20G4 Petitioner Dwarika Prasad Choudhary VerSU$ Resnondents : State of Chhattisgarh and others ¢J Present : Mr. Sachin $ingh Rajput, counsei for the peiitioner. Mr. Ajay Dwivedi, Pane! Lawyer far the Siaieirespondenis. 0 DER (Pas$ed an 22“ Day of February, ’200?) The petitioner, while working as Uppet Division Teacher in Government Higher Secondary School, Kotami, Biock Dabhara. Disttict Janjgir-Champa has been transferred to Government Higher Secondary Schooi, Lorami, District Biiaspur, vide order dated 16-9-2U04 (P4). 2. No stay order was granted by this Court in this matter. The transfer order dated 16-9~2004 (P-1) must have been executed by the respondents. 3. Be that as it may, with the passage of time, this petition has become infructuous as period of transfer is not applicable forever. ' At this point of time, there is no question to examine the vaiidity of the impugned transfer order. However, the respondents are at liberty to / / . . i \x ; pass appropyiate orders keeping in View the public interest and administrative exigency, without insisting on compliance of the impugned transfer order. 4. it is well settled principle of law that transfer is an incident of service and it ls for the employer to decided as to where a particular offlceriemployee be posted keeping in view pubtlc interest as well a5 administrative exigency. This Court has limited jurisdiction to interfere in the transfer matter and this Court can interfere only in the case of proved male lids, non-competence of authority passing the transfer order and transfer order not being in conformity with the rules and regulations. 5. in View of the abotre, the writ petition stands disposed oft I No order as to costs.