1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3529 OF 2010 Maars Software International Ltd. & Anr. ...Petitioners Versus The Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.L.S.Shetty with Mr.E.H.Newme i/b M/s.L.S.Shetty & Associates for Petitioners. Mr.Rajendra Kumar with Mr.R.A.Rodrigues for Respondent No.1. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND R.M.SAVANT, JJ. DATED:- MAY 3, 2010. P.C. 1. Preliminary objection regarding maintainability of this Petition is raised. According to the Counsel for the Respondent, the registered Office of the Petitioners is at Chennai within the jurisdiction of Madras High Court. Besides, the show cause notices were served on the Petitioners on the registered address of the Petitioner Company at Chennai. On the other hand, Counsel for the Petitioner states that except the initial inquiry, all steps have been taken by the Office of the Respondents at Delhi against the Petitioners, even though the registered Office of the Petitioners is at Chennai. Be that as it may, in the past, the Petitioners have challenged the 2 action of the Respondents by filing Writ Petitions before Madras High Court which can be seen from the document at Page 61 of the paper-book. 2. In the circumstances, we decline to exercise our writ jurisdiction with liberty to the Petitioners to approach the Madras High Court against the impugned orders, if so advised. (R.M.SAVANT, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)