1 36.08-revn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 36 OF 2008 Mohammed Akbar Abdul Wahid. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. Aniket Vagad for the applicant. Ms.A.T.Jhaveri, APP for the State. CORAM: B.R.GAVAI, J. DATED : 5th July 2011. P.C. : By consent of parties the revision application is taken up for final hearing. 2. By this revision, the applicant challenges the order dated 29th April 2004 passed by the learned Ad-hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Seweree, Mumbai thereby convicting the present applicant for the offence punishable under section 365 read with section 120(B) of I.P.C. and sentencing him to suffer R.I. for seven years and pay fine of Rs.3,000/- and the order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai dated 4th August 2007 thereby dismissing the appeal. 3. The applicant has already undergone the sentence for four years. The report from the prison authorities would show that the conduct of the applicant is satisfactory and he is regularly returning to the prison after 2 36.08-revn his leave is over. In that view of the matter, I find that the interest of justice would be made by passing the following order: O R D E R Though the order of conviction is maintained the order of sentence is reduced from seven years to the period already undergone by the present applicant. The applicant is, therefore, directed to be released forthwith, if not required in connection with any other crime and on payment of fine amount, if not paid. Revision application is disposed of accordingly. (B.R.GAVAI, J.)