IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO.463 OF 2010 DATED:30.6.2010 Between: Sri Moola (Palle) Agamaiah … Appellant And The Revenue Divisional Officer East Division, R.R. District Goshamahal at Malakunta Road Hyderabad and others … Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO.463 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Nisar Ahmad Kakru) Government land admeasuring Ac.1.30 gts., comprising survey No.131 situated at Bahadurpally Village, Quthbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, was resumed by the Government in pursuance of the proceedings recorded vide No.A/3513/2005, dated 25.4.2005. Being aggrieved, a writ petition was filed by the appellant bearing No.15836 of 2005 which was disposed of with a direction requiring the official respondent therein to pass appropriate orders on the explanation of the appellant – writ petitioner, consideration whereof could not beget any relief to the petitioner, therefore, a fresh writ petition bearing No.10040 of 2010 but again of no avail to the petitioner being belated one. Hence writ appeal on hand which is liable to be dismissed for one more reason referable to the order of resumption of land by the Government unto itself in the year 2005, followed by further passing over of possession by the Government to the authorities of Andhra Pradesh Rajeev Swagruha Corporation Limited (APRSCL) in the year 2007, apparently about half-a-decade ago. Yet the petitioner remained unmoved and did not invoke any remedy on which count there is no denying on the part of the appellant – writ petitioner. One more impediment is traceable to the very basic order of the assignment which dates back to February 1979 and reveals that the assignee of the land was one Shri K. Bakkaiah who in turn had sold it to the appellant. Ex facie in contravention of patta certificate. That apart original assignee is not a claimant before us and he is not the person aggrieved. Considering the matter in totality of the circumstances, interference is uncalled for. Dismissed. VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, CJ 30-6-2010 B. Narsinga Rao