IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 14TH JULY 2009 / 23RD ASHADHA 1931 RFA.No. 422 of 2009() --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 10/12/2008 IN I.A 2750/2001 IN OS.576/1978 of PRL.SUB COURT,THRISSUR .................... APPELLANTS/ADDL. RESPONDENTS 25 AND 26:- ----------------------------------------------------- 1. SIJIN S/O. MUNDANATTU GOPI VENGINISERY VILLAGE, DESOM, PARAKULM.P.O. THRISSUR TALUK. 2. BALACHANDRAN, S/O.THANDASSERY KRISHNAN PUTHUR VILLAGE, DESOM THRISSUR TALUK. BY ADV. MR. V.BINOY RAM RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER/RESPONDENT 6/ RESPONDENTS 10 TO 15/ ADDL. RESPONDENTS 16 TO 24, 27 TO 34/DEFENDANTS 8,4, 9 TO 11, SUPPLEMENTAL DEFENDANTS 12 TO 14 ------------------------------------ 1. T.S.SAROJ KUMAR, S/O. LATE SANKARAN, "DRISYA" PIPE LINE ROAD, MALAPARAMBU, KOZHIKODE. 2. REMANI, D/O. LATE VASUDEVAN, KOORKENCHERY VILLAGE, DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK. 3. SUBRAMANIAN, S/O. THOTTUNGAL KUMARAN, SREENARAYANAPURAM VILLAGE, DESOM, KODUNGALLUR TALUK. 4. SAKUNTHALA, D/O. THOTTUNGAL KUMARAN, SREENARAYANAPURAM VILLAGE, DESOM, KODUNGALLUR TALUK. R.F.A. No. 422/2009 : 2 : 5. SIVADASAN, S/O. SREEPURATH NARAYNAN, RAVIPURAM DESOM ERNAKULAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK. 6. VIMALA, W/O. THOTTUNGAL LATE SURESH BABU, KOORKENCHERY VILLAGE, DESOM THRISSUR TALUK. 7. SAVITHA D/O. THOTTUNGAL LATE SURESH BABU, KOORKENCHERY VILLAGE, DESOM THRISSUR TALUK. 8. ANOOP, S/O. THOTTUNGAL LATE SURESH BABU KOORKENCHERY VILLAGE DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK. 9. RAMESH, S/O. THANDASSERY THANKAMANI, S.N.NAGAR, VADOOKKARA DESOM, THRISUR TALUK. 10. MANOJ, S/O. THANDASERY THANKAMANI, S.N.NAGAR, VADOOKKARA DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK. 11. VINOJ S/O. THANDASSEY THANKAMANI, S.N.NAGAR, VADOOKKARA DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK. 12. UNNI, S/O. THANDASSERY THANKAMANI, S.N.NAGAR, VADOOKKARA DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK. 13. SANGEETHA, D/O. THOTTUNGAL LATE RENADEV, KOORKENCHERY VILLAGE, DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK. 14. ADV. DIVYA, D/O. THOTTUNGAL LATE RENADEV, KOORKENCHERY VILLAGE,DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK. 15. DHANYA, D/O. THOTTUNGAL LATE RENADEV, KOORKANCHERY VILLAGE, DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK. 16. GEETHA, W/O. THOTTUNGAL LATE RENADEV KOORKENCHERY VILLAGE, DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK. 17. RENJINI PRATHAP, D/O. HARIDAS, THACHAPPILLY HOUSE, CHETTUVA, KUNDALIYOOR, ENGADIYUR, CHAVAKKAD. R.F.A. No. 422/2009 : 3 : 18. SUNIL KUMAR, S/O. PANTHIRAYIL BALAN, KOORKENCHERY VILLAGE, DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK. 19. ABDUL KHADER, S/O. PUTHUSSERY YOUSUF, VADOOKKARA DESOM, KOORKENCHERY VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK. 20. RAGINI, W/O. THANDASSERY MANOJ, S.N.NAGAR, KOORKENCHERY VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK. 21. PAULY, S/O. AKKARA FRANCIS, KOORKENCHERY VILLAGE,DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK. 22. JANCY, W/O. AKKARA PAULY, KOORKENCHERY VILLAGE, DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK. 23. HARIDAS, S/O. SREEPURATH NARAYANAN, S.N.NAGAR, KOORKENCHERY VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK. 24. PRAMOD, S/O. VANNERI KESAVAN, KOORKENCHERY VILLAGE, DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK. 25. DAKSHAYANI, D/O. CHIRUKANDATH KUNJU, W/O THACHAPILLYKATTIL SANKARANKUTTY, KOORKENCHERY VILLAGE, DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR , J. ------------------------------------------------------------- R.F.A. No. 422 of 2009 ------------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 14th day of July, 2009. JUDGMENT The appellants, who are additional respondents 25 and 26 in the final decree proceedings commenced as I.A. No. 2750 of 2001 in a suit of the year 1978 instituted as O.S. No. 576 of 1978 on the file of the Principal Sub Court Thrissur, challenge the final decree passed by that Court on 10.12.2008 after overruling the objections of the appellants. The suit, after a contest, ended in a preliminary decree which was confirmed in appeal (A.S. No. 454 of 1986) before this Court. The appellants claims to be purchasers pendente lite from one Vimala to whom portions of the suit properties were assigned by one Anoop to whom the property was assigned by Vasudevan, the 2nd defendant in the suit and the transfers were hit by lis pendens. The court below has given valid reasons for overruling the objections filed by the appellants. The suit of the year 1978 R.F.A. No. 422 of 2009 : 2 : is yet to bear fruits even after 31 years of litigation. I am not inclined to interfere with the order passed by the court below which has given valid reasons as to why the objections of the appellants were liable to be overruled. This appeal is devoid of any merit and is accordingly dismissed in limine. Communicate a copy of this judgment to the court below. Dated this the 14th day of July, 2009. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. rv R.F.A. No. 422 of 2009 : 3 :