^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B. HON'BLE SHRI DHIRENDRA MISHRA. J Writ Petition (cl No.: M2007 Petjtjoner Respondents Asman S/o Sonuram, aged about 35 years, Sarpanch R/o Village Lubha, Gram Panchayat, Lubha, Tahsil Kondagaon, Distriot Bastar (CG) Vs 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Panchayat & Gramin Vikas Vibhag, DKS Bhawan, Raipur. 2. Collector, Bastar, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (CG) 3. Upper Collector, Jagdalpur, Bastar, District Bastar (CG) 4. Sub Divisional Offioer, Revenue, Tahsil Kondagaon, District Bastar (CG) 5. Navluram, S/o Saduram, aged not known to the petitioner. 6. Chamararam, S/o Dhaniram Gond, aged not known to the petitioner. 7. Heerabati W/o Dalsai, Gond, aged nc* known to thepetitioner. 8. Navratan S/o Jai Singh Kalar, aged not known to the petitioner. 9. Roopan S/o Beer Singh, aged not known to the petitioner. 10. Punau Ram, S/o Massu Gond, aged not known to the petitioner. 11. Ramnath, S/o Mansingh Gond, aged not known to the petitioner. 12. Chaitram S/o Sukman Gond, aged not known to the petitioner. 13. Sukdi, W/o Saradu Gond, aged not known to the petitioner. All above Resp.Nos. 5 to 13 are Panchas of Gram Panchayat Lubha, R/o Vill.age Lubha, Tahsil Kondagaon, District Bastar (CG) Dhirendra Mishra. J ithORAL ORDER (4tn December, 2009) Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, counset for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, GA for the State. Shri Sandeep Dubey,counsel for respondents No. 5 to 13. z- This petition is directed against the order dated 20.11.2007 (Annexure P/1) passed by the Director, Panchayat, whereby the stay application filed by ttie petitioner has been rejected. However, notices were issued to the respondents. The revision is still pending before the Director, Panchayat. ' Leamed counsel for the parties jointly submits that this petition may be disposed of with adirection to the Director, Panchayat, to decide the revision itself within a specified period and till then, interim order passed by this Court may remain in force. In view of above submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the Director, Panchayat, to decide the revision preferred by the petitioner within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. We also direct the parties to remain present before the Director, Panchayat, on 10th December, 2009. However, interim order passed by this Court on 6.12.2007 shall remain in foree till revision petition is decided. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge r'