W Riga (EVELERT §F $H§-§AT’F§$GARH: E§LAS?§.§?§ ¥i§§i Paiiicn 1%? N0. 1283 é? 223%8 Kammo Nis‘na. W§fe of Abdul Latii aqem‘ about 64 years; resident of Viiiage Baniyapara: Tahsii Kondagaon, District Ba$iar (CG). Faitzfémmr VEE’SEE 1} Siaie of Chhattisgarh thmugh ihe $esretaw: Regmmiems aspariment a? Tribéi Deveiapment, 9K3, Bhawan; RaifouHCG}. 2) T‘ne Coaectcr, District Bastar (Jagdaipur) (CG) a) The DMsmna} Jami Director, Treasurv Account and Pension Department, Raipur (CG). 4) Accaudtam General, Pagaria Compiex Hear new Bus Stand, Raipur (CG). The Semicr Assam? Gffécer. Sub Division 6, seize of Accountant Generai, Pagaria CompEex near new Bus Stamct Raégeur (CG) C1) OI V The Block Eduea‘tion Offacer. Tahsi: Kondgaon, District Baeta¥ (CG) { Writ Petit‘rorr umder Amcie 226 of the Con Eiruoon o‘? moia) $E: Eon’bie Mr. Seriisi‘; K. Aqnito‘irh u Ae‘nok KumarShukia COImsei for the petitioner U NS Dee, Govt. Advocate for the Star 0%. ?reee;'r1;: =====================u...“ “nun“..-w u... ”unmiu“... .uwuw-n“ 9v @RAL G§QE§ easse o en. 283‘ Feenaam zoee§ 'J; This case perr‘aine to grievance of non-grant of reiirai dues, This Goof. in the matrer of W.P.No.46£2f2004 (Baiinai‘n Manciai Ve. The Stare of hhariisoarh & others} and orher comeodted mater. erreoteo‘ toe ier of rerriai dues as rhe dispureo‘ quesiion of facts were invoived. The Committee was oomsiitured y the Staie Goveremenix pursue .r to Ehe order dared i9-G6-2006 oaeeed in WPNoki§61i2OG5 {Smt Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs Stare Government of Onnattiegarn and othersi, and order dated 4. 5-02—2008 massed in WPNo/iS23/200’5 (Nevin Kumar Bieariya Vs. Siare of Chnattisgeii oer). Thue, rhie oeririon is equareiv covered by the iudgment Commirree i0 consicier ih i x i l e and order dated 3131 January. 20GB passed in WRNQ. 4642f2004 (Baijnaih Mancial (supra) ) as submitted by Eeamed counsei arapearmg for the {James 2‘) Wiih the consent of the parties, this peiitian is accordingiy disposes‘ 0f in the same terms § e‘, the mice of the A ‘vecatg Senerak i$ directed to send the caSe to the Csmmit’fee, withm a perkm‘ of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of ihis order. Thereafter. the Commfféee shah issue nofioe to the petéffoner and the officer concerned wifhih a furfher period of 15 days The Committee shah caneider and pass order‘ in accordance wifh few, after affordihg proeer opportunitv of hearing to the petitioner The pefifioher and fhe officers concerned may riie addifronai documenre, ff necessary. The entire exerciser fnoiudinq oaymenf of refirai dues: if anyr f0 f1 e pefifioner, be compiefed within a p riod of four months from the date + o.: receipt of a copy of this order 3) The petitioner shaii suppiy extra copy of the petition to Shri UNS. Dee, teamed Government Advocate for the State, for onward transmission to the Committee. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Sd/—