1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 356 OF 2006 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 356 OF 2006 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 356 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 632 OF 1994 WRIT PETITION NO. 632 OF 1994 WRIT PETITION NO. 632 OF 1994 Vinayaka Ice creams (Pvt.) Ltd., & Ors. .. Petitioners. vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents. And Sudha widow of Madhukar Mehta .. Applicant. Mr. Brijesh Upadhyay i/by Purnand & Co. for the petitioers. Mr. Sushant D. chavan i/by Shirodkar & Co. for respondent No. 5. Mr. Pradeep Jadhav, AGP., for Respondent/State. CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & K.K. TATED, JJ. K.K. TATED, JJ. K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE: 16TH SEPTEMBER, 2008. DATE: 16TH SEPTEMBER, 2008. DATE: 16TH SEPTEMBER, 2008. P.C. . Heard. 2 2. The petitioners have no objection if the applicant is allowed to join as party respondent. So, the chamber summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Necessary amendment to be carried out within four weeks. 3. Thereafter issue notice to the newly added respondent no. 6 returnable on 10.11.2008. The petitioners to place on record the amended copy of the writ petition and also furnish copies of the same to the respondents. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (K.K. Tated J.) (K.K. Tated J.) (K.K. Tated J.)