IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.13393 of 2011 Dharmendra Kumar @ Chhotu son of Sri Bindeshwari Mahto Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 4/ 12.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was refused bail by order dated 28.09.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No.25802 of 2010 since there was circumstantial evidence against the petitioner to connect him to the murder of his wife. It has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 14.12.2009 and no witness has been examined after 30.03.2010. A report was called for from the Trial Court. The report of the Trial Court also suggests that the witnesses are not turning up during trial. Considering the period of custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Fast Track Court No. I, Nawada, in connection with Sessions Trial No.450 of 2009/84 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and another bailor shall be local since the petitioner is the resident of Nalanda district. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the 2 court about any change in the address of the petitioner, and (ii) That the petitioner shall be physically present on each date and if he fails to do so, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)