IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 7031 of 1988 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO LALIT DHIRAJLAL PANDHI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR JR NANAVATI for Petitioner No. 1 MR BD DESAI, AGP for Respondents No. 1-2 RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Date of decision: 14/09/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT This petition came up for admission on 18th October, 1988. Justice A.P. Ravani (as he then was), by a speaking order, admitted the matter and issued Rule. The learned Single Judge stated in the said order that two similar petitions had already been rejected by him but since he was told that some matters raising similar questions were pending, he had issued Rule in order to avoid multiplicity of proceedings. However, interim relief was not granted. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is no longer in possession of the premises and it is also stated at the bar that the matters which were pending have already been disposed of and the issues raised in this petition have been decided against the petitioner. In view of this, the petitioner would not be entitled to any relief in this petition. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Rule discharged with no order as to costs. ******* hki