IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15063 of 2010 1. SHAMBHU PANDEY S/O LATE RAMCHARITRA PANDEY R/O VILL.+P.O.- PATHRAURA, P.S.- RAJGIR MUFASSIL (CHHABILAPUR), DISTT.- NALANDA--------------------PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, NALANDA 4. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, NALANDA 5. BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, RAJGIR, NALANDA 6. PRINCIPAL, MIDDLE SCHOOL, CHAKPAR, P.O.+P.S.- RAJGIR, DISTT.- NALANDA 7. MRITUNJAN PANDEY AVINASI S/O RAM CHARITRA PANDEY AVINASI ASSISTANT TEACHER, MIDDLE SCHOOL, CHAKPAR, P.O.+P.S.- RAJGIR, DISTT.- NALANDA--------------RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 27.4.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. This writ application is in bad taste, if not ill advised, which has been filed by the elder brother against his younger brother for his virtual removal from the post of assistant teacher if not to pay 1/3rd of his salary since he was appointed on the death of his father under compassionate head and is not taking care of him and breached the undertaking given by him at the time of his appointment. As per the affidavit annexed with the writ application petitioner is stated to be 45 years of age and the enquiry report which has been annexed with the counter affidavit dated 13.10.2010, petitioner is stated to be 55 years of age. If he was a minor then there could have been an occasion to give observation in his favour. The prayer therefore for being maintained by his younger certainly amounts to blackmailing his brother. This Court does not want to be a party to a family dispute. As it is the private respondent is a low paid - 2 - employee and has a large family as sibling including his mother who have not made any allegation or grievance. The writ obviously lacks bond-fide. This writ is an ill advised petition and it is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)