IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11945 of 2008 KUMARIL SATYANANDAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 01.5.2008. Heard. Petitioner is the B.D.O. There are two allegations against the petitioner. The first is that the farmers were compelled to pay 10% commission to the Mukhiya in order to obtain subsidy granted to them by the Government. It appears to be the contention of the farmers that the Mukhiya is collecting 10% commission for the purpose of sharing 50% thereof with the Officers at the Block level including the petitioner. The other allegation is that the petitioner has not allowed subsidies to be paid to the farmers of four Panchayats without any just reason. Having regard to the nature of the allegations I think it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. The application is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender of the petitioner within six weeks from today, the petitioner, namely, Kumaril Satyanandan be released on bail on her furnishing bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two - 2 - sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Biharsharif (Nalanda) in connection with Sarmera P.S. Case No. 67/07 subject to the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. dk ( Barin Ghosh, J. )