IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10416 of 2010 FULO YADAV, son of Lakhan Yadav, Resident of village Suhat Bharna, P.S. Saur Bazar, Distrit Saharsa …… Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … Opposite Party ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Shekhar Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Uma Lal Verma, A.P.P. 3 13.04.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner files supplementary affidavit. Let it be kept on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. It is submitted that the petitioner was earlier granted bail vide order dated 20.12.2007 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 55926 of 2007. However, bail bond could not be furnished by him. Learned counsel submits that since the petitioner was in custody in relation to other case and also due to lack of knowledge of the procedure, he could not furnish the bail bonds in time. However, when the bail bond was furnished on 21.11.2009, the same was not accepted by the concerned Court on the ground of delay. The petitioner has remained in jail since 2 17.2.2005 due to his own fault. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, FULO YADAV, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge, II, Saharsa in connection with Sessions Case No. 308 of 2005, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be his father. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)