SPLA No. 94 of 2009 With CRLA No. 177 / 2009 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate present for the appellant / applicant. Heard learned counsel for the appellant / applicant on the application for leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 25.09.2009, passed by Civil Judge (Jr. Division) / Judicial Magistrate, New Tehri, in Criminal Complaint Case No. 48 of 2008, whereby the accused in said case is acquitted by the trial court from the charges of offences punishable under Section 420 and 423 of I.P.C. In brief, the complainant’s (present appellant) case is that accused / respondent entered into agreement with the complainant to transfer the land situated in Ajabpur Kalan, Dehradun, which was allotted to him. However, after accepting part of the consideration the respondent / accused did not transfer the land. The trial court, after the accused was summoned under Section 204 of Cr.P.C., recorded evidence under Section 244 of Cr.P.C., framed charge of offences punishable under Section 420 and 423 against the accused, and thereafter, recorded cross-examination under Section 246 of Cr.P.C. After hearing the parties, the trial court found that the complainant failed to prove the charge of offences alleged against the accused / respondent. Admittedly, the agreement between the parties was not registered. The case between the parties appears to be civil in nature. Apart from this, the trial court after discussing the evidence, has found that the complainant failed to prove charge of offences punishable under Section 420 and 423 of I.P.C., against the accused / respondent. Having gone through the impugned order, passed by the trial court, whereby the accused / respondent is acquitted, this Court does not find any sufficient reason to grant leave to appeal. The application for leave to appeal is rejected. The appeal stands dismissed summarily. (P.C. P., J.) 16.02.2010 HN