MMH SQURT OF (3HH$XT‘§"EMM£RM Mg“ mwixn‘35f3ww WWQMW QENgH Hz‘l‘}gd Wk m 5 R&N$NW§"L§ ”H k KARN MES Na.€?7 m5 MW AwWwmm Bhuneahwar 3am med about $2. mpgedgxms A (A t yaars, $0n cf 53hr: Kartk am, Gaata ~ ”Mi. accuwtmn - Amrcmture, mmdent c}? Vitiage Ghaa‘ghma, Muhawa a Newanam P Gharghara, D351“: Ragar ‘ Wamaaad‘) Smt Kami. wife a‘r’ 8m Bhunemww $ahu, aged abwt 27 yeara Casie — Teli, QCcupmian - Dependent, residam Qf viHage ~ Nawapara, Ghargherax P3 arid Tah Ghargmra, D£stt Ratgarh Chha't‘tisgarh Wwmm Nwnnwmwmnm Jagnamyan $ahu, mm Of Shri aimmed Rewmdams $ahu, aged abaut 3E) yeam, accupatécn - Dmler, remdent of viHage Chatamura, PS: Jcat Mm, Ra‘igarh, TahsH and Dist Raiaam {Chhattiggaz'm Sm? 2 Bevx Agrawm wife of SW3 Vham‘wam Agrawai Quaz"ef NO‘HG u— 22, Hauaing E’mard (Emmy, Eoiramar, PS; Chakmdhar Nagar, Raigarh, Tah and Digit Raigarh (CG “Hm (Dmmai insurance Company Limimd, Mari aazar (Nayagam) Raigam, Tah amd Distt Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) $xgmpl§wt§®m f0? {ewmm‘imn M Wm: Apwas mmm m 2W8 m Pmmm am Roman Dubev COL n88 fortha pamnem. QRHEW {4W “gamaary, 2M4?) Thg foiiawing Order of the Court was pamed by Raajmav @uma, Cm}. Shri Roghan Dubey, ieamed comma! for the petitkonem £3 heax’d an the reamrat‘icn patitmn. 2) Tm pet‘mianers, are seeking resimation of MA. No.153/2OD5 which wa3 dmmiswd far want of progecution vEde arder dated 14.1 2.2003 3') Cm due conaideration of ‘the aubmissiom of ¥eamed mange! for “the pgtitmners and the grounds taken in the {eatoratmn petition, we are aaiigfied that the abwnce of the peiiiionere’ /appeiianie’ conneei 0n i4‘i22OC3S} when MA No.153/200§ was; taken up for hearing, wee beeed on bone fide gi‘ounde. 4) MCEC N0§7W2DG§X therefore, ie aiiowecf enci M.if«.N0‘f‘33/2OOS ie metered to ire eriginai numberx Sd/— Sd/— Chief Justice Rangnath Chandrakar Judge