IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45198 of 2010 1. RAJENDRA PASWAN 2. RAJ KUMAR PASWAN 3. UDISH PASWAN 4. RAM JATAN PASWAN 5. BACCHE PASWAN @ BACCHE LAL PASWAN ---- PETITIONERS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR. --- OPP. PARTY ----------- 02 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners, who are five in numbers, seek anticipatory bail in connection with Sakari P.S. case no. 43 of 2010 instituted under Sections 302/34 of the Penal Code. As per allegation in the F.I.R., when the informant returned back home he saw the petitioners herein escaping from his house. The informant entered into the house only to find that his son was strangulated to death in the ‘angan’. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that parties are on litigating terms and admittedly there is no eye witness to the actual occurrence. It appears from perusal of the impugned order that in course of investigation witnesses have supported the implication of the petitioners. Considering the nature of allegation and the materials on record, this Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of bail to the petitioners. Prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. Let petitioners surrender in the Court below and apply 2 for regular bail which shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law. Sym/ ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)