Crl. Misc. No.M-32282 of 2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-32282 of 2010 Date of Decision: November 15, 2010 Khushi Ram and another …..Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab and another …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Ms. Sushma Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that respondent- complainant Parveen Rani has locked the first floor of self-acquired property of petitioner No.1. It has been submitted that respondent No.2 comes to the first floor alongwith unidentified persons and threatened the petitioners. Crl. Misc. No.M-32282 of 2010 [2] I have considered the pleas taken by the petitioners before this Court and I am of the opinion that these pleas were taken for the first time before this Court and it will not be appropriate to appreciate said submissions. The orders passed by the learned Magistrate and the Additional Sessions Judge indicate that the petitioners have not produced any proof regarding the property being self-acquired or that any disturbance is caused by respondent No.2 while visiting the first floor of house No.922. No ground is made out for interference in the interim orders. Dismissed. However, it is observed that in case there is any interference on the ground floor by respondent No.2, it will be open to the petitioners to approach the trial Court where the case “Parveen Rani Vs. Harish Chander etc.” is pending. It will be open to the petitioners to establish that no final relief can be granted to respondent No.2, petitioners being owners of the property having self-acquired the same. November 15, 2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE