IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6244 of 2008 Date of decision:- 03.02.2009. Baru Ram ...Petitioner Versus Reliance General Insurance Company and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present:- Mr. R.C. Kapoor, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Goyal, Advocate for respondent No.1-Reliance General Insurance Company. JASWANT SINGH J.(Oral) The present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner-Baru Ram, owner of the offending vehicle i.e. Motor-cycle make Bajaj bearing Engine No.36588, Chassis No. 18244, for setting aside the order dated dated 25.10.2008 (Annexure P-3) passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Yamuna Nagar whereby his application for leading additional evidence by way of placing on record original insurance cover note of the motor-cycle in question, copy of receipt issued by the Registering Authority(MV), Jagadhari and copy of cash/credit memo dated 01.08.2006 has been declined. It is stated that on 04.09.2006, the said motor-cycle, owned by the petitioner, was involved in the accident causing the death of one Jaipal @ Babli, husband of respondent No.2-claimant, son of Baru Ram and father of respondents No.3 to 6 claimants. It appears that due to the mistake of the counsel for the petitioner-respondent, the original insurance cover note of Civil Revision No.6244 of 2008 -2- the motor-cycle in question, copy of receipt issued by the Registering Authority(MV), Jagadhari and copy of cash/credit memo dated 01.08.2006 could not be tendered in the evidence. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, in my opinion, the documents are absolutely essential for the just and proper adjudication of the case as they go to the root of the case. Hence, this petition is allowed and the impugned order dated 25.10.2008 (Annexure P-3) is set aside. Learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Yamuna Nagar is directed to provide one effective opportunity to the petitioner at his own responsibility to place on record the aforesaid documents on or before the next date or the date to be fixed by the learned Trial Court subject to payment of Rs.1,000/- as costs to be deposited before the District Legal Services Authority. With the above observations, the present revision petition is disposed of. February 03, 2009 (JASWANT SINGH) vj JUDGE