THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO.19836 OF 1997 DATED: 13-02-2007 Between: G. Uma Shankar .. Petitioner And The District Collector & Magistrate, Nizamabad District, Nizamabad. .. Respondent THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO.19836 OF 1997 ORDER : The petitioner claims to be a social worker exposing the illegal acts committed by various authorities in Nizamabad District from time to time. In this writ petition, the petitioner assailed the proceedings of the Collector and District Magistrate, Nizamabad dated 15-5-1997 under which all the District Oﬃcers in Nizamabad District were requested not to give any credence to the complaint petitions ﬁled by the petitioner and another person by name Sri Parsram Devneni. It is primarily contended by the petitioner that the impugned proceedings which were issued without aﬀording an opportunity to him to explain the allegations is arbitrary, illegal and violative of the fundamental principles of natural justice. Though no counter-aﬃdavit is ﬁled on behalf of the respondents, a perusal of the impugned order dated 15- 5-1997 itself shows that it is nothing but a communication from the District Head requesting the officials of the District not to take cognizance of the complaint petitions, if any received, since the petitioner along with one Sri Parsram Devneni has been indulging in making false complaints against the oﬃcials with an intention to blackmail them for the personal gain. Admittedly the petitioner is not holding any public oﬃce. Though in the impugned proceedings the expression “blacklisted” is used, the purpose of the impugned proceedings is only to caution the subordinate oﬃcials not to carry away with the allegations in the complaints, if any received from the petitioner. Such administrative instructions issued by the Head of the District which cannot be held to be in breach of any statutory obligation does not entitle the petitioner to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Hence, no Writ of Mandamus can be issued. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J. Dt. 13-02-2007 gbs