The Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.12245 of 2010 Dated 2nd June, 2010 Between: K.Naragoud …Petitioner And The Prohibition and Excise Superintendent, Kamareddy …Respondent Counsel for the petitioner : Mr.Kowturu Vinaya Kumar Counsel for the respondent: GP for Prohibition and Excise The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside order, dated 17-05-2010, passed by the respondent whereby the petitioner’s TFT licence is kept under suspension pending action for cancellation of his licence. At the hearing, Sri Kowturu Vinay Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, sought to raise contentions on merits. In my opinion, this Writ Petition cannot be entertained for the reason that the petitioner has an effective alternative remedy of appeal under Section 63 of the Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968. When the effective remedy of appeal is available to the petitioner, ordinarily this Court does not entertain a Writ Petition. The petitioner did not make out any case for this Court to treat this Writ Petition as an exception to this rule. In this view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy of appeal in order to question the order impugned in this Writ Petition. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.15444 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 2nd June, 2010 lur