IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 5669 of 2005 Between: Racharla Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Venkata Ranga Rao, R/o. Mogilicherla Shivaru, Kothapet Road, Reddy Palem, Hanamakonda (M) Warangal District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House Officer, Intzar Gunj Police Station, Warangal District. 2 Sri Komurovelli Ravi Kumar, S/o. Kumaraswamy, R/o. H.No. 8-8-30, Girmajipet, Warangal. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue writ or direction preferably writ of mandamus declaring asthe inaction of the 1st respondent police in proceedings withs the investigation in crime No. 31/04 is illegal, arbitrary, and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent no. 1 to conduct investigation in crime No. 31/04 and pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.KOWTURU VINAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Mr.Nooka Jagannadham The Court made the following : O R D E R: The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the 1st respondent-police in proceeding with the investigation in Crime No.31 of 2004, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently to direct the 1st respondent to conduct investigation in the said crime. It is stated that the investigation has been completed and the final report has been filed on 30.06.2004 referring the case as “civil in nature”. That being so, nothing survives in the writ petition and if the petitioner is aggrieved by the said final report, it is always open for him to question the same or to file a fresh complaint before the authority concerned. In the circumstances of the case, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. Date:03.03.2008 Ccm To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RLD}