1 pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1025 OF 2010 Vijesh Dharamdas Thakkar .. Petitioner Vs. The Senior Inspector of Police Borivli (West) Police Station and ors. .. Respondents Ms. Pooja Bhojne for petitioner. Mrs. S.D. Shinde, APP for State. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. JULY 06, 2010. P.C. Heard. Admittedly, on 10/6/2010 the petitioner’s statement has been recorded by the Borivli Police Station and C.R. has been registered. The petitioner’s limited complaint is that his employee – Mr. 2 Navsir Sajanwala has misappropriated an amount of Rs.1,45,264/-. We are informed that the petitioner has not filed a civil suit for recovery of the said amount from Mr. Sajanwala. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that even though C.R. has been registered against Mr. Sajanwala he has not yet been arrested. On registration of the CR, the police will undertake investigation and file appropriate report to the competent court. The efficacious remedy for the petitioner is to file a civil suit against his employee for recovery of the alleged misappropriated amount and the petitioner has not yet resorted to such a remedy. In our opinion, nothing further survives in this petition after the C.R. has been registered and the petition is disposed as such. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)