1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7670 OF 2009 Vishnu s/o Dhondiba Jadhav, Age 39 yrs. Occ. Service r/o Nehru Nagar, Rajangaon (Shenpunji), Tq. Gangapur, Dist. Aurangabad ..PETITIONER VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra through the Secretary for Education Department Mantralay Mumbai 2. The Director of Education, Maharashtra State Administrative Building, Pune 3. The Divisional Deputy Director of Education, Aurangabad 4. The Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad 5. Gram Vikas Mandal, Rajangaon (Shenpunji), Tq. Gangapur, Dist. Aurangabad, through Secretary 6. Holly Cross Marathi High School, Aurangabad, Taluka Dist. Aurangabad Through its Head Master ..RESPONDENTS Mr A.B. Tele, Advocate for the petitioner; Mrs A.V. Gondhalekar, A.G.P. for respondents no.1 to 4; Mr A.S. Shelke, Advocate for respondent no.5. 2 CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ DATE : 16th April, 2010 ORAL JUDGMENT [ PER P.V.HARDAS , J ] At the outset, Shri Tele, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks oral leave to amend the petition by incorporating a prayer for directing the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner, dated 25.5.2009, in accordance with law. We grant leave to the petitioner for amending the petition. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner further states that the petitioner for the moment does not press for the reliefs at prayer clause (C) and (D) to the petition and accordingly seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a petition afresh after the decision of his representation. We accordingly dismiss this petition insofar as it relates to prayer clause (C) and (D) with the liberty as prayed for. 3. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission. 3 4. Since the representation of the petitioner dated 25.5.2009 is said to be pending, we direct the respondents to decide the said representation, if pending, in accordance with law and communicate the decision thereon to the petitioner. 5. Rule is thus made absolute on the above terms with no order as to costs. ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA ) ( P.V.HARDAS ) JUDGE JUDGE amj/wp7670.09