1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8527 OF 2007 Shri.Gangadhar Nivrutti Kathe. ...Petitioner vs. 1.The Deputy/Addl.Commissioner & Competent Authority under Urban Land(Ceiling & regulation)Act, 1976, Nashik & others. ...Respondents. AND WRIT PETITION NO.8516 OF 2007 Shri.Madhav Nivrutti Kathe. ...Petitioner vs. 1.The Deputy/Addl.Commissioner & Competent Authority under Urban Land(Ceiling & regulation)Act, 1976, Nashik & others. ...Respondents. AND WRIT PETITION NO.9513 OF 2007 Smt.Vatsalabai Gangadhar Kathe. ...Petitioner vs. 1.The Deputy/Addl.Commissioner & Competent Authority under Urban Land(Ceiling & regulation)Act, 1976, Nashik & others. ...Respondents. 2 AND WRIT PETITION NO.9512 OF 2007 Smt.Baby/Bebi Madhav Kathe. ...Petitioner vs. 1.The Deputy/Addl.Commissioner & Competent Authority under Urban Land(Ceiling & regulation)Act, 1976, Nashik & others. ...Respondents. AND WRIT PETITION NO.9485 OF 2007 Shri.Namdeo Nivruti Kathe (since deceased through legal heirs) 1.Rahul Namdeo Kathe & ors. ...Petitioners vs. 1.The Deputy/Addl.Commissioner & Competent Authority under Urban Land(Ceiling & regulation)Act, 1976, Nashik & others. ...Respondents. --- Mr.N.M.Sathaye, for Petitioners. Mr.S.R.Nargolkar, AGP for Respondents 1, 1A, 2(a & b) & 4. Ms.Vaidehi Mhaispurkar, for Respondent no.3. 3 CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & R.Y.GANOO, JJ. DATED: 11th June, 2008. P.C.:- 1. The learned Counsel appearing for both the sides are agreed that the facts and law involved in these petitions are identical to the facts and law involved in the writ petition no.8387 of 2007. Therefore, for the reasons recorded in the order dated 11.6.2008 passed in writ petition no.8387 of 2007, these petitions are also disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (R.Y.GANOO,J.) ---