IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 19584 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 01, 2011 Aseem Takyar …Petitioner Versus Chief Secretary to Government of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present: Mr. Manvinder Singh, Advocate for Mr. Amit Rawal, Advocate for the petitioner. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, Acg. CJ. 1. The writ petition as well as amended petition has not disclosed a number of other things which have been pointed out to learned counsel for the petitioner on the last date of hearing when an adjournment was granted. Therefore, we dismiss the application as well as writ petition with liberty to petitioner to file a fresh one on the same cause of action by incorporating the comprehensive prayer. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh one with detail particulars. (M.M. KUMAR) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (RAJIV NARAIN RAINA) JUDGE November 01, 2011 Atul