CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 12999 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.12999 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION: AUGUST 9, 2011 Rakesh Kumar ….Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. R.S. Mamli, Avocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Nehra, Sr. DAG, Haryana, for the State. Mr. Vimal Kumar Gupta Jagadhri, Advocate, for respondent No.5. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. Mr. Nehra hands over a copy of reply in Court, which is taken on record. The query raised about as to why the petitioner was not adjusted at Panchkula, when the post was transferred as per the stand of the respondent is answered as under:- 1 CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 12999 of 2011 “That the petitioner was engaged on contractual basis by the Industrial Training Institute, Yamunanagar, to instruct the trainees in the Trade of Stenography English. The said Industrial Training Institute has no trainees now in the said trade. In any case, in the event of admissions to the said trade at Panchkula subject to its affiliation/recognition by the SCVT/NCVT as the case may be, the ITI concerned shall have to give the first preference to the petitioner. So, in view of the position as above, the petitioner has only prematurely approached this Hon’ble Court as he has contractual relationship with the ITI where there is neither any post nor any work for him to render and no orders of any Court have been violated by the answering respondents.” In view of the stand taken in the reply, no case for further proceedings with the writ petition, is made out, at this stage. The petitioner, if is not adjusted despite the above stand, may have a grievance to raise. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of as having become infructuous in view of the statement as noted above. August 09, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH) monika JUDGE 2