1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Bail Application No. 7631/2010 Hari Ram Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 20.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr GL Sharma - for the petitioner Mr Amit Poonia - Public Prosecutor BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that other co-accused compromised the matter with the complainant. Petitioner, under that impression, did not appear before the trial court. He will regularly attend the court, if bail is granted. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. He submits that period of bail jump is of around ten years. No justification exists therefor. Thus, petitioner may not be granted bail. 2 After considering rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Hence, bail application is dismissed. However, trial court is directed to expedite the trial and, if possible, conclude the same within sixty days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. If, for any good and sufficient reasons, trial is not concluded within aforesaid period, petitioner would be at liberty to file a fresh bail application before the trial court. The trial court may consider the same and grant bail on the condition that accused petitioner will attend the court on all dates of hearing in future. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma