BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRITPETITION (C) N0. / 2011 PETITIONER ^0?" (^^••^ ,v- ..-•' €ft5-'""y ^ RESPONDENTS Satvanti Devi Mittal W/o. Shri Prem Chand Mittal, Aged about 60 years, - R/o. Patthalgaon road, Lailunga, District-Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2.NagarPanchayat, Lailunga, District- Raigarh, (C.G.) 3. Collector, Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA PETITIONER RESPONDENTS H1GH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C1NO. 7185 OF2011 Satvanti Devi Mittal Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Saurabh Dangi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S.Murthy, Dy. Advocate General for the State wifh Shri Arun Sao, Government Advocate for the State. Shri C.P. Shrivastava, Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Lailunga, District Raigarh, is also present. ORDER (Passed on fhis 01st day of December, 2011) 1. hleard learned counsel for the parties. 2. At the very outset Shri Murthy, learned Dy. Advocate General appearing with Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate, on instructions by the Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Lailunga, who is present in the Court, submits that the impugned notice of demolition dated 25.11.2011, whieh without affording an opportunity of hearing, was issued for demolition of the alleged unauthorized construction, has been withdrawn by subsequent notice dated 26.11.2011. Acopy ofthe said notic& is taken on record. In view of the above, according to the learned counsel appearingfor the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. However, the Nagar Panchayat will not take any action without affording proper opportunity of hearing to the person concerned. The Nagar Panchayat may also decide the question of authorized or unauthorized structure, as the same is in dispute, before passing the order, after considering the cases of the persons concerned. —_— -^-i Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ashok