1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 4534/2010. Madhukar Ramaji Jangle -: VERSUS :- Chindu Ramaji Jangle Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 27, 2010. Heard Shri R.A. Gupte, learned Counsel for petitioner. The Trial Court has allowed amendment and permitted respondent / plaintiff to take plea of property being self-acquired by withdrawing the earlier plea that it was ancestral. The learned counsel contends that the written statement is already filed by the present petitioner on the strength of that plea. In the written statement plea taken is property was ancestral, it was acquired under Land Acquisition Act and the respondent / plaintiff took compensation of his share 2 and also of share of defendant and the property therefore ceased to be ancestral or then, he ceased to have any share in it. This defence is not prejudice in any way, even if the respondent / plaintiff is permitted to contend that the property is self-acquired. The learned counsel has also attempted to show to this Court the two notices issued by the respondent in which same plea has been taken by him. The documents are available and can be used appropriately in evidence. The Trial Court has looked into the controversy and considered the entire material and there is no jurisdictional error or perversity in the same. Petition is, therefore, rejected. No costs. JUDGE Rgd.