^ ^? •l^?1 lesP ^^.f^ • ^wirg"' •' !»&*****" •'.''.' ' . •• "' '•.' ''•':'• ''' '•:'••".•' •''.•.•''/. <^ mTHEmGH COUKTOF CHHATnSGARH ATBIIASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. ^&& /2005 PETITIONER Dinesh Kuinar Sahu, aged aobut 21 years, son of Late Shri Sahdeo Prasad Sahu, resident of yillage Hirri, P.S. Pam.garh, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 'VERSUS ^:^:^. ^a'sHT^.^ ^" ^^-~^ 's RESPONDENTS 1. StateofChhattisgarh, through the Secretaty; Department ofifc Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Comrnissioner, Tribal DeVelopment Department, :^ Raipur (G.G.) Asstt. Comnussioner, Tribal Development Department, Korba, Distt. Korba(CG) Collector (Tribal Development), Korba, Distt.Korba (CG) 5. Block EQucation Officer, -BlocfcPaaU, Tah and Distf. KOTba(C.G.) .^:.. :. • WRTT PETmON UNDE8 AK'IICLES 226/227 OF THE GQNSTmj'BON OF IN@IA; The petitumer respeGtfuUy submrts as under:- 01) PAKncmAfiSABOUTTHEPETmONER The iparticulars crf the petitioner gnren in ffiie eause itttle. --^*"^ •'y^,^' ^y !^.yvt^y g?" ^3- ^y 4. XI-HC-22: aijcSJ^l' &-ii.<ti 3)1^1 sti^icfr^Tf^tT \. ^" itt ^ '3^,^ll-ill(rKt9Ti1*l"ia,;;fc«'ll'yy. sTt^r ^..@^^/w. illtlCTI St)*<|cn ""'"'""'^""""""y'"'"'S^ 200 ^Wss' 3fl^r¥RiW^iS^ 3-1-2006 Shri V.K. Pandey^ coynsel fbi ••*••' • • .'.• .'•':•.'.: - '. ..'.. •• ' ' •'''.' '• •' - .'• , ShnsVi\rek Shdmna, Rghel l-ai - Heard.' ' Learned coi.msfelforthepetitl' was w6rkihg..as:Assistant;Teacher during thecservice.-'peripd and th /;appointment which syas clenjed. .tt, b^iringW.P.-No.1322/2002 irwoh/ii passed by th.is Court on-20/12/200(5. He prays that similar ordeFs may be passed in tliis oase also. ^ ' Leamed counsel fbr ttie Sts states that ttie State otChhattisgarh' ^ • '." . • - ..•:•••• • . ••. • • - . • •• - - of dependahts of th6S§emplpyees parties, without expressing any'opin ofthis Court, ends ofjustice will be the petitioner in aocpFdance with the| father. If the petitioner fbund etigi^l eariy as possjble on'br befope 30' A| render due co-pperation to tlie a< grievancestill remains, the petitionel' law inctuding flljng ofthe petition befl3 With'the aforesajd observaticlr CertifiedcopyiasRern.tles.^ ~ Copy to fhe State^coUnselJ order to the respondents for.eo.mpji8|r (*ii<lftvi4ii ^iHdT ^ f^><^ Tf^t-^ %'3lNH^.3n^T ItbepetBioner, ;, jyer.tor the State. •ner states triat the pptitioner's jatti^r,' who n Tribal Department, cSiedon 8/5/2000 • 'petitioner applieEl for compassionate ' '.* '•.•' •• "•'." -;'::. " .'):. .:. " " • • , further si.fbmitted that in batch of oases g the same question ordere tiave been te does not dispute the above fact and las faken a decision t6 consider the cases tibdied on or^ter1/1'iyt997anrfstrtetly inacoordane6v^hfhe policyprevale^atthattirne^;^ ; ." ;-tri*ytewofthe subtTHssipns^rTfacle:by learnedcounsel .apRearing'forthe nonittiemeritsof^hecase,in^heopirMon sn/edifadirectionlsgiventotheStateof Chhattisgarhand the authorities eon|cerned to conslder.anst dec.idethe case of policy pre^lent at the time af death of his te, ^appointment oFdere witl be issued as rit, 2006. The petitionerisalsodirectetjfo thorities. It is made'clear that if any may.avail ttie remedy available underthe irethis.Court. . , ^ , is, ttiis petition stands:ctlsposed cA " vho wilt be obliged to communicate the ce. Sd/- Fgkhruddin Judge