IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8495 of 2011 SUDARSHAN KHAN, S/o Late Bijendra Khan. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 24.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 392, 411 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that when the stolen motor-cycle was recovered in Bangaon P.S. Case No. 58 of 2009 the petitioner was remanded in the present case which was the parent case. Considering the same, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. The Magistrate concerned is directed to consider amalgamation of the present case with Bangaon P.S. Case No. 58 of 2009 since both the cases arise out of the same transaction in view of Section 220 Cr.P.C. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)