IN THE HIGH COURTOF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, CHANDIGARH. C.R.No.5080 of 2011 Date of decision:24.8.2011 Gulshan Kumar ...Petitioner vs Vinod Jain ....Respondent CORAM: MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG. --- Present: Mr.O.P.Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. -- Rakesh Kumar Garg,J.(Oral) This is tenant's revision petition challenging the impugned order whereby provisional rent has been assessed by the Rent Controller. In view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Harjit Singh Uppal v.Anup Bansal, JT 2011 (6) SC236, in which it has been held that any order passed by the Controller in the proceedings under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, is appealable, this revision petition is not maintainable Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the impugned order by seeking appropriate remedy in terms of the aforesaid judgment. Ordered accordingly. (Rakesh Kumar Garg) Judge August 24, 2011 rk