S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail Appli. No.338/2008 (Govind Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : February 04, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Deelip Kawadia, for the petitioner. Mr. J.P.S.Choudhary, P.P. for the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. From perusal of the order impugned, it appears that the dacoity is alleged to have been committed by the co-accused. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is only recipient of the cloths, which were subject- matter of the dacoity. In the circumstances, therefore, in my view, it is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, on the contrary, in such matters, a custodial interrogation is necessary. The bail application filed by the petitioner under section 438 Cr.P.C. is, therefore, dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-