IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1391 OF 2010 DATE OF DECISION: SEPTEMBER 21, 2010 Gulab Singh .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. Ashok Kaushik, Advocate for Mr. Ajit Malik, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG, Haryana, for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. (ORAL) The petitioner has filed this writ petition for direction to the respondents to admit him in training course for Multipurpose Health Worker (Male) for the Session 2009 in the School at Sonepat. The petitioner had applied for admission in the physically handicapped category. He was interviewed and has not been admitted. Respondent No.4 has been granted admission in the said category. In response to notice, the State has filed reply, stating that respondent No.4 was admitted to the training course against one reserved seat for physically handicapped as per the Haryana CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1391 OF 2010 :{ 2 }: Government reservation policy as he was higher in merit than the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner says that the marks obtained by the petitioner were more than respondent No.4 but respondent No.4 was given more marks in interview and selected. It is not disputed that interview was held and the admission was granted on the basis of merit so determined. That being the position, no interference in this case would be called for as the admission on the lone seat meant for the physically handicapped category has been granted on the basis of merit. Dismissed. September 21, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE