1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CA NO.12706/2008 IN FA st. NO.35208/2003 Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court s’ Orders or directions and Court’s or Judge’s Order Registrar s Orders.. ’ CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 30th JUNE, 2009 --- P.C.:- 1) Heard Mrs. Mane, learned AGP for State. 2) There is delay of 96 days in causing to file appeal challenging the order dated 18th January, 2003 in LAR No.26/1997. The proposal for drafting the first appeal was received at the office of Govt.Pleader on 3rd November, 2003. It was handed over to the concerned AGP on 6.11.2003, who immediately drafted the appeal within a week and sent the papers for filing the appeal. The delay, though appears to be exorbitant, is properly explained. Delay condoned. Application allowed. 3) Incidentally, the order under challenge is perused. The SLAO granted compensation to the tune of 2 Rs.1,16,597/- while the Reference Court made it to Rs.5,00,000/-, the difference is Rs.3,83,403/- with other statutory benefits flowing from 1992. 4) Notice to the claimant, call R. and P., returnable on 16th December, 2009. (K.U. CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/bdv/ca12706.08