IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC (T) No.: 56 of 2008. Decided on: 28.09.2010. __________________________________________________________ Ghanshyam Dass. … Petitioner. Versus Pradeep Bhardwaj. … Respondent/Contemnor. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. S.R. Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. B.N. Misra, Advocate. For the Respondent- Contemnor : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Mr. S.R. Sharma, Advocate appearing vice Mr. B.N. Misra, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening events. Consequently, the same is dismissed as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved, he can make a representation to the competent authority. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. September 28, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?