wp1292.08 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1292 OF 2008 Omshanti Bahuuddeshiya Krida Shaikshnik Wachnalaya & Sevabhavi Gramin Vikas Mahila Mandal, Hangarga(c), Tq-Nilanga, Dist-Latur, Through Secretary, Sou.Asha Kishanrao Panchal, R/o-S.T. Colony, Dnyaneshwarnagar, Sakat Nivas, Nilanga. ...PETITIONER. VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra, Justice, Cultural Work and Special Assistant Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 Through its Secretary, 2) The Commissionarate of Handicap Welfare, Through its Commissioner, Maharashtra State, Pune, 3) The Divisional Social Welfare Officer, Latur, 4) The Social Welfare Officer, Zilla Parishad, Latur, 5) Sadguru Yadanand Maharaj Shikshan Sanstha, Navandi, Tq-Udgir Dist-Latur, Through its Secretary, wp1292.08 2 6) Yeshwantrao Chavan Sevabhavi Bahuuddeshiya Sanstha, Latur, Tq. & Dist-Latur. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri.P.S. Dighe Advocate h/f. Shri. R.L. Kute Advocate for Petitioner. Shri.V.B. Ghatge, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Shri.S.S. Manale Advocate for Respondent No.4. Writ Petition is dismissed as against Respondent Nos.5 and 6 as per order dated 8/6/2011. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND T.V. NALAWADE, JJ. DATE : 17TH OCTOBER, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties. The Writ Petition is dismissed against Respondent Nos.5 and 6, as per order dated 8th June, 2011. 2. The Petitioner's contention is that initially proposal was submitted to transfer Sant Gadge Baba Niwasi Mati Mand School in their favour wp1292.08 3 as they wanted to run the school. But later on it was noticed that by Government Resolution dated 2nd February, 2006 the said school was allowed to be transferred to Respondent No.6 - Yeshwantrao Chavan Sevabhavi Bahuuddeshiya Sanstha, Latur. The Petitioner challenged the said order. 3. It is contended by the Petitioners that the said school is still not being run by Respondent No.6. The Petitioners were not heard by the State Government. According to the counsel for the Petitioners, the Petitioners are also ready and willing to comply with the conditions imposed. 4. This Petition was filed on 11th February, 2008, it is still pending admission hearing. As the Petitioners could not serve Respondent Nos. 5 and 6, the Petition came to be dismissed against Respondent Nos. 5 and 6. The learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that the said school is not being run. Nothing is placed on record of this wp1292.08 4 Court in respect of the said school being not run by Respondent No.6. 5. In case the said school is not being run and if the State Government is desiring to transfer the management, then the State is at liberty to take appropriate decision. The Petitioners can file comprehensive representation to the State Government. 6. The Petition is pending since the year 2008 and questions of facts are raised, so we are not inclined to issue any further directions except the observations made by us as above. The Writ Petition is disposed of. [T.V. NALAWADE, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] asb/OCT11