IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DECEMBER 2011 / 16TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 32444 of 2011(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. MOHAMMED SHABIR A.P., NAIYAMPULLY HOUSE, PUNNAYOOR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-679562. 2. KANNAN P.V., PATTATHIL HOUSE, SOUTH KOCHUMURI, OACHIRA P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN-690526. 3. ANEESH P.S., PALAPARAMBIL HOUSE, VADAMA P.O., MALA, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680736. 4. FARZEEN RASHID, PEARL COTTAGE, DIVINE VILLAGE, NEAR I.M.G., KAKKANAD, KOCHI-682030. 5. NITHIN VIJAYAN, SUKU NIVAS, PAMPADY P.O., THIRUVILWAMALA, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680597. BY ADV. SRI.V.MADHUSUDHANAN SRI.T.ISSAC RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT-673636. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT-673636. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.32444/11 APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE IST PETITIONER. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 4TH PETITIONER. EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 5TH PETITIONER. EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN DATED 21/11/2011. EXT.P7 TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN DATED 8/11/2011. EXT.P8 TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN DATED 23/11/2011. EXT.P9 TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN DATED 23/11/2011. EXT.P10 TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN DATED 23/11/2011. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 32444 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 7th day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners are B.Tech students. When the result of the 4th Semester examination was declared, petitioners failed in different papers. They applied for revaluation as per Exts.P1 to P5 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the University for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp