IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 1063 of 2009 Date of Decision : 10.12.2009 Smt.Suri Bharti ……… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ……… Respondents Coram:- Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble B.C.Kandpal, J. Present: Mr. Vipul Painuly, Advocate for the petitioner. J.S. Khehar, C.J. (Oral) Through the instant writ petition, the petitioner claims protection as against harassment being caused to him at the hands of respondent No.4, the Senior Sub Inspector at Police Station Kotwali, New Tehri, Tehri Garhwal. We have gone through the pleadings of the writ petition and also heard learned counsel for the petitioner. It is apparent from the pleadings, as also the submission advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner, that the name of the petitioner does not figure either in the first information report, nor in the chargesheet submitted by the Police. Consequently we are of the view, that no clear cause is made out at the hands of the petitioner for protection. Be that as it may, we considered it appropriate to permit the petitioner to move a representation to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Tehri Garhwal (respondent No.2), placing all material facts for his consideration alongwith a certified copy of this order. In case, 2 such a presentation is made by the petitioner within a week from today, the Senior Superintendent of Police shall look into the matter and take appropriate action, as may be necessary in the matter. The writ petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Order Dasti on payment of usual charges. ( B.C. Kandpal, J.) ( J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 10.12.2009 P.Singh