Contemgt Pemian No.39 a? EOQ4 1. HG. Goswami, S/o Shri Rameshwar Giri Goswami, aged 47 years, Occupation- Service presently working as Lecturer in DtDtS. Higher Secondary School, Birra, (QG) PiEmiONERs VHlage-Birra, (CG) 1’ERSUS BPS. Netam, Director, Directorate of Pubiic instruction Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG) . 2, BL. liiieravi, Joint Director, Directorate of Public Instruction, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG) Prasent: 4 Wm”! Higher Secondary School, Birra, Rio Disfrlot Contempj Petitian unde; Article 215 ofrthe Constiiutionpf India. Shrl lndrasen Sahu, counsel for the petitioners. Janjgir-Champa Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, coun5ei for the respondents. 9.$$§$§§§£ (Passed on 4‘5 May, 200?) This Court by its order dated 15.10.2003 in writ petition No.3006r2003 had passed the following order and directions : y Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having regard to the facrs and circumstances of the case, it is directed that the petitioners may be allowed to continue on the pOst on which they are working today untii further orders. {2) L.me and and petitioners) the respondents have disobeyed wiiifully and deliberately the rs and directions issued by rhis Court an 15102003. ‘ orde t is the case of the petitioners before this Court that on the date when ord'er came to be passed by ihis Court they were working as Lecturers therefore, g. ’me i respondents em cannot asx ‘ them to work as Shrkeha _ Karmis a also cannot pay salary of the Shlksha Karmi. Therefore: according to the filgH EQUiTm°E§H5&Hl§§AR§£T§J L£1$E¥R SINGLE BENCH : HOMBLE SHRI H.L. DATTU, CJ. R/o Village—Bins, District Janjgir-Champa 2, BK Vaishnav] Slo Shri LR ‘V‘aishnav, aged 45 years, Occupation—Service presently working as isoturer in DDS. /’ i f1 WV (3) i Respondenis have entered appearance e rough leamed counse! and they have also fixed their detailed counter affldavit a‘ong with arder paesed by “te Govemmeht dated 25.08.2003 {4) A perusal of the aforesaid order wouid ciearty demonstrate that petitioners’ services came to be absorbed by the State Government onty ae ShikJq‘na Karmie, and not as iecturers, Oh the day when the order came to be passed by thie Court, the petitioners were werking as Shiksha Karmie and not as ie’cturers. lf they are continuing on the same poet, in my opinion} the respendents i have not commrttedtany . act of disobedience . . of the orders and diredtions issued by this Court. Therefore, I do not intend to take cognizance of this contempt petition. Aocordingiy, the contempt petition is rejected Any observations made by me in the course of the order wouid not some in the wayiot ti e petitioners urging alt the said contentions which are avaiiabie to them in the writ petitien which is pending before this Court Ordered ihe S ’ .—'»~4A w-"—~ i . rut: l is: Sdl- i . accordingiy. i .‘