IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2330 of 2011 Rekha Kumari @ Rekha Devi Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 3 12.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. According to petitioner she had highest marks when so called merit list was prepared and therefore she is entitled for her appointment on the post of Anganbari Sevika. The stand of the respondents in the counter affidavit is that the so called merit list was rough chart which was prepared based on the applications filed and the matter was looked into. It was found that father-in-law of the petitioner is a P.D.S. dealer and in terms of the guidelines for Anganbari Sevika persons of such kind are debarred from consideration. That is the reason why one Ruby Kumari was found fit as per her percentage of marks and had been appointed as per the guidelines annexed with annexure-A. There is no denial or rebuttal of the stand taken by the State by the petitioner. If that be so then obviously the petitioner is not qualified to be appointed or has otherwise suffered any infirmity because of the above stated facts. In view of above no direction in her favour for appointment can be made by this Court. This writ application has no merit and it is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)