•-^- ^"!':y:io/ THE BQrBLE ffiGU COUBJ QF CHHjKmSGARM XT BIU^SPU iC-^} WRH PEirOlQ^22J^a_M2^_QE2mMSA^. JPEIiTJQNiB.' ^JeevanJaJ, Aged at?out 69 years S/OLate OGangaPrasad ^^"?p ^ nl^Ui^ Caste;Sona.r, VlUavge Urorel^ DlstFtCfc; Korba (C^.) R^PQPA&EME^^p.l. Dorllal ^fO Lste Gangs Prasad PEPSt>^K^^^ pgg^ Ba.odjiu S/0 Jsli»warPra^ad ^_3. PF3»d^a 1^.N> <M2. P&A^^ 4. S/0 Jshwsr Prasad 5. Baljnath S^O Ishwar Prasad 6< Suresta Xumar S/0 Isjbwar Prasad 7. Amrika Bal DJQ Xsbwar Prasad; ^_8- Pushpa Devl D/0 Jshwar Prasad 9, Sskuoteta BN^^^Jskwar Prasad H/'5 AIJ by caste Sonar, R/0 VlUagei Umreli, ^ui>TahslJ BarpaJi, Dlstrlct Korba (C.G.) ^ 10. State of Chhattjsgarh, Through: Coltector^ Korba, (C.G.) ^ ll.TahsUda.F Barpall(Kartala) District Kort?a, (C.G.) D /7/&^//i> WRII PEIITIO^ UNI>ERAKIiaLE 227 QE TUE COEASFTTUTIjQM OF MDSA COCTNi-3 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (227)No. 2822/2010 PETITIONER Jeevanlal Versus PLAINTIFF RESPONDENTS DEFENDANTS Dorilal and others SB:- HON'BLE SHRI N.K. AGARWAJ/, J PRESENT:- Shri Mukesh Sharma, Advocate, for petitioner. Shri J.K. Gupta, Advocate, for the respondents No. 1 to 6, 8 and9. Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel Lawyer, for the State. ORAL ORDER (3-1-2011) 1. This petition is directed against the order dated 25-2-2010 passed by the District Judge, Korba in Misc. Civil Appeal No.1/2009. 2. Shri Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the petition may be disposed of directing the trial Court to dispose of the suit expeditiously. 3. The prayer is reasonable. 4. Therefore, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to decide the suit expeditiously. ?/ Sd/- N.K.Agarwal Judge