IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9088 of 2011 Manoj Kumar Tiwary son of Shree Ram Pravesh Tiwary, resident of Village- Jaso Road, Kali Mandir, Golambar Buxar, P.S. Buxar (M), District- Buxar. …… Petitioner. Versus 1. Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Main Road, Buxar, P.S. Buxar (M), District- Buxar. 2. Regional Manager, State Bank of India, Buxar, District-Buxar. 3. The Chief Manager, State Bank of India, R.B.O. Ara, District- Bhojpur. …… Respondents. ----------- For the petitioner : Mr.Bachan Jee Ojha, Advocate. For the respondents : Dr. Binay Kumar Singh & Mr. R. S. Vidyarthi, Advocates. ------- 02/ 13.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging demand notice dated 10.03.2011 issued by the respondent-Bank under the provision of Section 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for the sake of brevity) by which demand of Rs. 3,84,606.00 was made. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that against the said notice he has already filed an objection under Section 13(3-A) of the Act on 26.04.2011 to respondent no.1 which according to him is pending, but according to learned counsel for the respondent –Bank it has been disposed of. 4. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent- authority - 2 - to dispose of the objection of the petitioner filed under Section 13(3-A) of the Act, if not yet disposed of, and till the disposal of the said application, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. If any order has already been passed on the petitioner’s objection under Section 13(3-A) of the Act, the authority of the Bank shall communicate it to the petitioner. Sunil (S. N. Hussain, J.)