( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.44 OF 2007 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.44 OF 2007 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.44 OF 2007 IN IN IN SUIT NO.4538 OF 1999 SUIT NO.4538 OF 1999 SUIT NO.4538 OF 1999 Jyoti P. Gandhi ...Plaintiff V/s. Rohit Maneklal Sanghvi & Ors. ...Defendants Plaintiff present in person. . Defendant No.1 present in person. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 12th December, 2008. DATED : 12th December, 2008. DATED : 12th December, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Plaintiff in person. Defendant No.1 in person. 2. The Plaintiff wanted some clarification as to how the amendment is to be carried out in view of what is stated in (iv) of operative order. The Plaintiff is informed that she has to tender draft amendment and move the Court for seeking an order in terms of the ( 2 ) draft amendment. 3. Plaintiff stated that time to carry out amendment is already over. She sought time to tender draft amendment. Time is extended upto 7th January, 2009. (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.)