^4-? ^ HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRET PETITION (S) N0.1732/2009 PETITIONER Smt. Neeta Srivastav, W/o Late Pawan Kumar Shrivastav, Aged about 36 years, R/o village Sahaspur Lohara, Tehsil/P.S. - Sahaspur Lohara, District Kabirdham (C.G.) Vs. RESPONDENTS 1 State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Women and Child Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Sahaspur Lohara, District Kabirdham (C.G.) 3 Pariyojna Adhikari, Women and Child Development, Sahaspur Lohara, District Kabirdham 4 Smt.Rajkumari Soni, W/o Baldev Soni, Aged about 42 years, R/o Sahaspur Lohara, District Kabirdham (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Shri H.S. Ahluwalia, Counsel forthe petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents No.1 & 3 on advance copy. ORAL ORDER (02.04.2009) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard. The Director (Panchayat), Raipur while finally deciding the Revision Case No.221/B121/2003-04, in between petitioner, respondent No.2 & respondent No.4, directed the following in the last part of the order dated 15.10.2008: 1 <.' W.PCSINo. 1732/2009 ••^llv^i^^t. "......... 3I(T: ^ 31'llclRchl ^ -^f^ ^K ^ cf5t ^ 1^f^T f^TW 27.01.04 ^ ^ ^"T ^K ^\ crf^cTT ?RH c^t ufnft f | chl4cbdi ^ TRT sri^? wrrf^T f^ uii^ ^r •eri' ^r ^ici^ch wftEFr f^zrT uni i y^T gTT?rgm sn^r Pi^iciid tor vn?fr t i......" After the said order, the petitioner moved for correction of the reco.rds in relation to her seniority. By a communication dated 10.02.2009 (Annexure P/1), the Project Officer, Ekikrat Bal Vikas Pahyojna, Sahaspurlohara, District Kabirdham, informed the petitioner that the gradation list is prepared on the basis of Class XII pass and since the petitioner is VIII pass, she cannot be given seniority on the basis of the said order passed by the Director (Panchayat). Presently, Shri Ahluwalia is not in a position to show any Rule/Circular on record for fixation of the seniority in the matter of the petitioner's category service, therefore, 1 deem it appropriate to direct the petitioner to file a representation in this regard before the District Collector along with the copy of this order and the copy of Annexure P/1 and P/2 showing her grievance. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction that if so advised, the petitioner may file a representation before the Collector, as above and if such a representation is filed, the Collector shall dispose of the same at the earliest in accordance with the provisions or Circulars, ifany, issued in this regard. Certified copy as per rules. — — — — Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge