IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR .^±1CC^V'2^/. CONTEMPTj^fflON^O.rlI^ /2009 APPLICANTS ^;'1v^' /4V /w 3. ^y/. ^ 5. Lakhanlal S/o Jaleshwar, aged about ^8 years, Arthkunwar widow Kishore Kumar, aged about 40 years, Chtralekha D/o Kishore Kumar, aged about18years, Deepak S/o Kishore Kumar aged about18years, ; Ku. Sarita Patel (Nanki Noni) D/o Kishore Kumar aged about 10 years, by Natural Guardian Rathkunwar, widow of Kishore Kumar. 6. Guruvaribai widow of Gajanand, aged about 50 years, Chatrapati S/o Gajanand, aged about 38 years, 8., Rajendra Kumar S/o Gajanand, aged ^" about 26years, 9y Nankinoni S/o Gajanand, aged about 25 years, 10. Mu. Revati D/o Jaleshwar, aged about 50 years, '- All applicants resident of village Amaldiha, Tahsil - Sakti, District - Janjgir- Champa (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS ^' 7. «•'• ^ NON-APPLICANTS CONTEMNORS J^/f Baleshwar,S/oLateS)iriBhagirathi Aghariya, aged about 60 years, Kurso S/o Vakil Aghariya, aged about 45yeaiS, Sundermani S/o VakilAghariya, aged about40years, A Nanki - Noni widow of Vakil Aghariya, agedabout not known Allnon-applicantsresidentofYillage Govindpur P.S. Chandrapur, Tahsil Dabhara, District - Janjgir- Champa 4. 5. (Chhattisgarh), y^y\^w-.. -StatOofChhdttisgarti,Jhrough-'s:£-ai)7)»9 •twaftrT~"M!in*Pn • ' ' GQllector, District - Janjgir- Champa (Chhattisgarh) .; APPLICATION UNDER ARTICLE 2'te'5F;THE ebNStlTUTIONLOF INDIA READ WITH'SECTION 12 OFIHE.CONTEMPT QF COURTS ACT.1971.FORINITIATING CQNTEMPT PROCEEDINGS. X '\.-. \- '3-^'^ITqR;PT, »Tlly'!(o, fs|diy^< . <S^~l - &pe. fc)M.'?LI'L1/^>9 HIHCTI g,t(|q, -—->• ^pj ^OQ Bn^r't^T (' sninv h-f '^TT3l^<!t SOHW Tumane TCTOR^Hftg 3ii^r <:hl<<i<'1<ftl 'WT^ff ^f t^T^ ^f5(^R ^3TfTO3I!^( SB : Hon'bIeShri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. 12-09-2011 None for the applicants, even iv\ take appropriate steps as ordered by the second round. On earlier dates of hearing, tifne was granted to the applicants to this Court on 07-01-2011 to suitably amend the petition stating specific facts with regard to the date of service of notice on respondents/eontemnors and the status quo which existed on thatday. | Specific averments have not b 07-01-2011. No representation is dismissed reserving liberty to the appficants to file a fresh petition with the proper particulars and specific averm^nts. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge en made as directed by this Court on made. Therefore, this petition is €• is r ^SS^'.&'is'.ia^'Ksi.iS^ii^^tisSN ^s.^^3 S'S ^.^:s