C/flw?/@ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIsGARH AT BILAspUR WRIT PETITION {S} No. W?” 12010 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, gmt. Silvina Kujur (Before marriage Ku. Silvina Tirkey, aged about 42 years W/o Robert Kujur, occupation - Asst. Teacher, Presently working as Upper Division Teacher, Middle Schooi — Dharamjaigarh, District — Raigarh (CG) PETITIONER VERSUS L/State of Chhattisgarh, through — Secretary, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh / Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Distt. 3. Raigarh(CG) Joint Director (Treasury, A/c & Pension), Bilaspur (CG) 4. Block Education Officer, Block — Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Ralgarh (CG) RespoyDENTs / M WWW awam‘m mm fsém SB : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan §hrivastava, J. 05-08-201 0 Shri A. N. Bhakta, counsel forthe petitioner. Shri Vinod Tekam, Pane! Lawyer for the Statelrespondents on advance copy. Heard. Learned counsel appearing fur the petitioner submits that the advance increments on account of before her appointment at her own Iolved in the present petition is no oeen finally decided by the Hon’ble Saxena vs. State of MP. & Ors., submitted that this Court has also er dated 06-02-2009 passed in Jnsel for the petitioner further draws 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeal the judgment of the Supreme Court id the order passed by this Court in directions have been issued for 3f two advance increments as per he State of Madhya Pradesh, after aetition. Learned counsel for the resp petitioner would also be considered or petitioner is entitled to benefit of two she having passed B.T.i. examination cost. it is submitted that the issue in‘ ionger res integra and the same has Supreme Court in the case of Asha 2009 (III) MPJR (SC) 59. It is further taken a similar View in his ordi W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. Learned co attention of this Court to order dated Noi124 of 2009‘ wherein relying upon in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) at another Writ Appeal No.87/2009, consideration of the case for grant circular dated 21 09-1974 issued by i verification of the facts pleaded in the ondents submits that case of the i the same lines. r i WW .imb.ls/w wrzoo ’ ,W wzoo ‘mm (W)