1 SA. 1654.2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. SECOND APPEAL NO. 1654 OF 2004 (Kashibai w/o Govindrao Kadam and others VERSUS Sheshrao S/o Govindrao Deshmukh and others) Mr. Dhananjay Mane, Advocate h/f. Mr. Milind Patil, Advocate for the appellants Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders P.C.:- 1] Heard learned counsel. Appellant no. 3 informed, expired. No legal representatives are brought on record. Appeal already abated by order dated 17.4.2009. 2] Appellant nos.1,2, 4 to 9 were served through Court service however, no response. 3] The concurrent findings against the plaintiff in suit for specific performance of contract is debated in the Second Appeal. The Courts have analysed the evidence of the scribe and the witness on the consideration of the events and did not find favour with the contention raised by the plaintiff about the execution of agreement 2 SA. 1654.2004 of sale concerning the suit property. The finding is in tune with the document, does not warrant any interference. Second Appeal stands dismissed. Sd/- DT. : 26.04.2010 (K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.) arp