;!Wff2 c . s-\° L. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR. CHHATTISGARH Writ Petition No. of2006 PETITIONER: ^.:-v^--""".... -'v^-y'" -•••"' .?5^"'" _f ^ ^v^' !y RESPONDENTS; ^ Arjun Singh Sisodia, S/o Late Shri Jawahar Singh Sisodia, Aged about 53 years, R/o Block Colony, Bilha, Tehsil & District: Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. - Versus - 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department ofRevenue, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Collector, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. , 3. R.K.Anant, Additional Tehsildar, Sub Tehsil: Ganiyari, Tehsil: Takhatpur, District: Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPMATE WRIT/WRITS. DIRECTIONS ETC. IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI AND/OR ANY OTHER SUITABLEWRIT OF LIKE NATURE XI-HC-78 *11*1WI Sb*11<ft 3^ •^wici^, ®Tn'y'i(o,[sicii^y ..^f.^'.^^/A6 ^ 200 3ii^i tiafi (yt^sis'sr) 3i^T?>rRHi+ (raT3TI^TsbHI°ti <^ <-^' ^iraTdfscTsn^r petiticjner pass4d 23.6.2006 Heard Shri P.Diwakar, 5i|- Adyocate for the petitioner. Shri Satish fiupta, Dy. 6o^1 By this petition the order dated 08.06.2CX)6 petitioner has been transferrej raised by the petitioner for seei^i orcter is the frequent transfers that the petitioner is an outsta^ he has been subjected to Bilaspur to Bilha and then Bilha year. Learned Senior Counsel petitioner has already made appreciating the services reni Collector had recommended petitioner vide letter dated l' requested that respondent No^. representation of petitioner case. to which leamed counsel fol frequ^nt 4ii'i<f<-i'i(l-f t<iii-iTftTsl<fl <Ri^i< ^sif^irsiRST .Advocate with Shri Indrasen Sahu, t. Adv. for respondent Nos.l <& 2. has questioned the propriety of the by respondent No.l whereby the ^ from Bilha to AAarwahi. The ground ing judicial review against the impugned It has been mentioned in the petition iding and mer'itorious person even then transfers i.e. from Bilha to Bilaspur, to AAarwcxhi vuithin a short span of one flor flor the petitioner submi^ed that the representation in this regard ond fered by the petitioner the Acting cancellation of transfer of the }th & 16th June, 2006. Therefore,he .1 may be directed to consider the sym^athetically looking to the facts of the the State has no objection. XI-HC-78 'TSI •^i-Micii, ®T(1«'i6,Rcii^y *11+1CTI ShHlth V^ 200 3ll^<l 4s«t)(yii^ai^tT) sn^rw^-TW cW3I7^Tsbt| \- Roshan/- 4 ^^ '^" <^ STdraTBfscrsn^T -2-' the loilier Haying heard learned coun^el the facts and circumstances of decide the representation of •t+ii to pass appropriate orders withii^ the points raised by the petitio^ier already been relieved, he should is decided. With the direction aforesalid Consequentty, M.(W.)P. disposed of. Ko 'bllfcl'fl-f 111CTTfffelA<Rl*<;K ^sri^riT^n^r for the parties ond having regard to case, respondent No.l is directed to petitioner in accordance with law and a period of 30 days after considering ler. Till then if the petitioner has not not be relieyed till the representation id, the petition stcnds disposed of. 3.2261/06 & 5908/06 also stand Sdi- L.C. BhsciC0 .ludg's ' ^/.^ ^'