CRM-M No. 21791 of 2011 **** Balvinder Kaur and another v. State of Punjab Present: Mr. S.S.Swaich, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Abhishek Chautala, AAG, Punjab. Mr. B.D.Sharma, Advocate for the complainant. **** This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in case bearing FIR No. 74 dated 19.05.2011, under Sections 363, 366-A, 120-B IPC registered at Police Station Kharar, District S.A.S. Nagar. On 21.07.2011 the following contention was noticed:- “ Learned counsel has argued that the brother of petitioner No.1 contracted a run away marriage and now he has been sought to be implicated in a false case because disputes have arisen between the couple.” Learned AAG, on instructions from ASI Mahinder Singh, has stated that the girl in question has since been recovered. Learned counsel for the complainant has vehemently argued that after being recovered, the girl has specifically implicated petitioner No.2 in an offence of kidnapping and rape while learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the girl had appeared before this Court in a petition for protection. In my opinion these claims would be considered in the trial Court. However, at this stage it would be in the interest of justice to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Let the petitioners appear before the investigating officer on 14.10.2011 between CRM-M No. 21791 of 2011 -2- 10.00 a.m. and 4.00 p.m. and on any other dates on which their presence is required by him. The investigating officer shall release them on bail to his satisfaction, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE September 29, 2011 sunita