IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1062 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: September 17, 2009. Hartej Kaur ...Petitioner(s) v. Ramesh Jindal & Anr. ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Shri Parveen Kumar Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri M.C. Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for respondent No.1. Shri R.S. Bhatia, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ORDER Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): Learned counsel for the petitioner states that though the order dated 23.3.2009 has been complied with by the respondents, however, a fresh recovery has been ordered against her which she has challenged by filing a civil writ petition. In view of the aforesaid, I am not inclined to proceed further in this petition. Rule discharged. However, the dismissal of this contempt petition shall not prejudice the rights of the petitioner in the aforesaid petition. September 17, 2009. [ Rakesh Kumar Garg ] kadyan Judge