Crl. Misc. No.M-20222 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-20222 of 2011 Date of Decision: July 8, 2011 Satpal …..Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.S.S.Godara, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) I have gone through the statement made by Suman Bala under Section 164 Cr.P.C. specifically naming the petitioner to have committed sexual inter-course with Rekha. Counsel for the petitioner submits that Rekha in her statement has not levelled any allegations of rape against Sat Pal. On the basis of the said contradiction, petitioner claims to be innocent. Crl. Misc. No.M-20222 of 2011 [2] In view of the specific allegation of rape against the petitioner in the statement of one of the prosecutrix, I do not deem it appropriate to grant concession of bail as there are chances of tampering with the evidence. Dismissed at this stage with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh petition after recording of the statements of prosecutrix Rekha, complainant and Suman. July 8, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE