IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18584 of 2009 1. ANITA DEVI W/O SRI CHHAMGORI MANDAL R/O VILL- SHITALPUR, P.S. AZAM NAGAR, DISTT. KATIHAR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. MEMBER, DISTRICT TEACHERS APPOINTMENT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DISTT. KATIHAR 3. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE KATIHAR 4. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION KATIHAR 5. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER AZAMNAGAR, KATIHAR 6. BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER AZAMNAGAR, KATIHAR 7. PANCHAYAT SECRETARY GRAM PANCHAYAT SHITALPUR, BLOCK AZAM NAGAR, DISTT. KATIHAR 8. SHREEDHAR PANDEY S/O LATE ARADHPAD PANDEY R/O VILL- SHITALPUR, P.S. AZAM NAGAR, DISTT. KATIHAR ----------- 02. 28.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order-sheet of the Appellate Tribunal suffers from error on record when it states that despite notice the petitioner refused to participate in the proceedings. An order sheet, more particularly in a judicial or a quasi judicial proceeding carries a sanctity of its correctness. If the person is aggrieved by the recitals in the order-sheet, his remedy lies in moving the authority first for correction therein. The authority is first competent to examine the issue of correctness or incorrectness of recitals in the order sheet. Leave is sought to withdraw the application to purse remedies appropriately before the Appellate 2 Tribunal itself with regard to errors in the order sheet. The application is dismissed as withdrawn. P.K. ( Navin Sinha, J.)