IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12074 of 2011 Shri Mahadeo Mehta SON OF SHRI MISHRI LAL MEHTA RESIDENT OF NARHA BAGHLA, P.S. TRIBENIGANJ, DISTRICT SUPAUL. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SUPAUL. 3. THE DISTRICT AGRICULTURE OFFICER, SUPAUL. ---------------------------------- 2 22/09/2011 The grievance of the petitioner is that in the merit list which has been prepared for appointment on the post of Kisan Salahkar by the respondent authorities of the district of Supaul, he has been wrongly shown at serial no. 452 because of a wrong entry of 418 out of 900 marks in the Intermediate examination. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner based on annexure-5/1 is that the petitioner had 488 marks obtained in the Intermediate examination conducted in March, 1993 with Roll Code 654, No. 10082 enlistment No. SS-9194/1991. The College in question from where the petitioner had passed the examination is said to be A.L.Y. College, Tribeniganj, Supaul. If the marks sheet attached with the writ application of the petitioner Annexure-5/1 is the correct and authentic marks sheet which was submitted by him and - 2 - the marks obtained by him was furnished in his application to be 488, then obviously, there seems to be some mistake, may be of the clerical kind and it will require re-correction. Let respondent no. 3, the District Agriculture Officer, Supaul verify from the record as to what is the kind of marks or the document which was submitted by the petitioner for his selection as a Kisan Salahkar and if there is a mistake in tabulation, then necessary correction would be required to be made in the merit list. However, if the present position of the petitioner emerges on the basis of the declaration and the supporting material furnished by him at the time of filing of the application, then nothing would be required to be done in this regard. If the petitioner approaches respondent no. 3 with a copy of this order on this count, necessary decision would be taken and communicated to the petitioner within a period of six weeks from the date of communication or production of a copy of this order of the High Court. This writ application is disposed of with the direction aforesaid. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)