IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.6288 of 2006 Date of Decision : 10.09.2010 Executive Engineer, PWD, Kaithal ... Petitioner Versus Hanuman Parshad Gupta and another ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. Aman Chaudhary, Addl. AG, Haryana for the petitioner. Mr. B.S.Walia, Advocate for respondent No.1. *** HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) The challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 29.05.2006 passed by learned District Judge, Kaithal whereby an appeal against the order dated 14.09.2005 passed by the learned trial court making the Award dated 03.05.1996 as rule of the court, was dismissed. The argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the Award under claim No.1(a), (b) and (c) is beyond the terms of the agreement and therefore, the arbitrator has exceeded his jurisdiction in awarding a sum of Rs.6500/-, Rs.3750/- and Rs.8,000/- against such claims. The arbitrator has examined the terms of the agreement and returned a finding that such an amount is admissible. The Award of the arbitrator is a reasoned Award. Therefore, the civil court cannot examine the Award as an arbitrator in wake of facts. In view of the above, I do not find any patent illegality or irregularity in passing above Award, which may warrant any interference by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. 10.09.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) sonia JUDGE