IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 4140 of 1999 Between: Miss T.Sandhya D/o. T.Rathnam Aged about 19 years Occu:Student R/o. 502, Narayana Apartments, Secunderabad – 26 ..... PETITIONER AND 1.. Osmania University rep by its Registrar Osmania University, Hyderabad 2.. The Controller of Examinations, Osmania University, Hyderabad 3.. Muffakkam Jah College of Engineering and Technology rep by its Principal, Banjara Hills, Road No.3 Hyderabad .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction , declaring to action of the respondents in not issuing the Memorandum of marks of the 1st semester of 3rd year of B.E I/IV of the writ petitioner and not allowing her to writ the 2nd internals of 3rd year and 2nd semester of 3rd year inspite of fulfilling the rules framed by the University is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and against to principles of natural justice Counsel for the Petitioner:MS.M.VENKATESWARI Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.Deepak Bhattarjee The Court made the following : ORDER : The present writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in not issuing the memorandum of marks of the First Seemster of Third year and in not allowing the petitioner to writ the 2nd internals of third year and second semester. This Court passed interim orders dated 31-3-1999, which read as under: “Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I consider it appropriate to direct the respondents herein to issue the memo of marks of I Semester of 3rd year of B.E-III/IV to the petitioner and depending upon the result of the I Semester, the petitioner is permitted to prosecute further studies. There shall be an order accordingly in W.P.M.P.” Learned counsel for respondent submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ___________ N.V.RAMANA,J 14-6-05 TVK ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.. The Registrar,Osmania University Osmania University, Hyderabad 2.. The Controller of Examinations, Osmania University, Hyderabad 3.. The Principal, Muffakkam Jah College of Engineering and Technology,Banjara Hills, Road No.3, Hyderabad 4) 2 CD copies 5 ) 1 CC to MR.DEEPAK BHATTACHARJEE Form-NIC-OGS/WP{ }