IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM SATURDAY, THE 20TH AUGUST 2011 / 29TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 9151 of 2010(T) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ K.A. CHACKO, PROPRIETOR, MERIN FOOD PRODUCTS, THANKAMONY, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.A.ABDUL SALAM, SRI.ANIL KUMAR M.SIVARAMAN, SRI.GEORGE THOMAS. RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEDUMKANDOM, IDUKKI. 4. THE SECRETARY, C.I.T.U. IDUKKI DISTRICT COMMITTEE, CHERUTHONI, IDUKKI. 5. THE PRESIDENT, I.N.T.U.C., IDUKKI DISTRICT COMMITTEE, IDUKKI. 6. THE PRESIDENT, BMS, IDUKKI DISTRICT COMMITTEE, NEDUMKANDOM, IDUKKI. 7. THE SECRETARY, AITUC-IDUKKI DISTRICT COMMITTEE, PAINAVU, IDUKKI. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.T.K. VIPINDAS. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs WP(C).No. 9151 of 2010(T) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY DRIVER BENOY JOSEPH BEFORE THE S.I. OF POLICE, NEDUMKANDOM. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.9151 of 2010 ------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of August, 2011. J U D G M E N T PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, J. In this writ petition seeking police protection to the lives of the petitioner and his workers and for carrying out loading and unloading works in the business of the petitioner and for a direction to respondents 4 to 7 to refrain from interfering with the petitioner's business, this Court on 15.6.2010 passed an interim order in the following terms :- “There will be an interim order directing respondents 2 and 3 to grant protection for the petitioner and his driver to carry on loading and unloading work, as against the obstruction from the members of respondents 4 to 7, for a period of one week.” 2. We notice that though service is complete, none of the party respondents have entered appearance to resist the averments in the writ petition. The averments stand 2 W.P.(C) No.9151 of 2010 established by non-traverse. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of confirming the interim order dated 15.6.2010 and issuing a direction restraining the members of respondents 4 to 7 from interfering with the business of the petitioner under the name and style 'Merin Food Products, Thankamony'. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE ami/