gst 1 wp2189.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO. 2189 OF 2011 Sarveshwar Industries... .... .... ..... Petitioner. V/s M/s.Pararthana International .... .... .... Respondent. Mr.Suraj Shah, Adv. For the petitioner. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI, J. 25th March, 2011 PC: Prima facie I find that the reasoning given by the learned trial Court and the learned Appellate Court in allowing the application filed by respondent- defendant for setting aside no cross orders, is not correct in as much as the Courts below themselves have come to a finding that the reasons given by the defendant in the applications were not correct. However since the Courts below have exercised their discretion, in the interest of justice, so as to give an opportunity to the defendant to defend their case rather than foreclosing the doors of justice to them on technical ground I am not inclined to entertain the writ petition under extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 2. However taking into consideration the facts and circumstances the learned trial Court is directed to expedite the hearing of the suit and decide the same within a period of six months from today. It is made clear that no unnecessary adjournment will be granted to the defendant. 3. In view of aforesaid direction Writ petition stands disposed of.