IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7186 of 2011 CHANDRA SHEKHAR UPADHYAY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 22.06.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Dumra P.S. Case No. 190 of 2009 registered under Sections 419, 420, 408, 409, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. It was specifically alleged against one Manoj Kumar of not constructing the toilets. Subsequently the Executive Engineer submitted a report that toilets were made but the toilets were not made according to prescribed standard. Considering the same Manoj Kumar has been granted regular bail by this court vide Cr. Misc. No.28129 of 2009 on 18.11.2009. The petitioner was not named initially in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner subsequently surfaced. I seen no reason for the learned court below to give the same privilege to the petitioner and try to dispose off the 2 regular bail application of the petitioner if possible on the same day if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within a period of six weeks from today. With this observation, this application is disposed off. Let the order be faxed to the learned C.J.M., Sitamarhi in connection with Dumra P.S. Case No. 190 of 2009 at the cost of the petitioner. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)