1 11 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4687/2006. Nizammudin Vs. A.C.J. (S.D.), Pali & Ors. Date of Order :: 4th September 2008. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr. Narpat Singh, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Panwar ] Mr. Sukesh Bhati ], for the applicant. ..... BY THE COURT: The matter has been placed for orders on the application (IA No. 357/2008) filed under Order I Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure whereby the applicant Shahid Ali has stated himself to be the Secretary of Chudighar Panchayat, Pali in whose favour the impugned orders were made and that the respondent Manjoor Ali impleaded in the present writ petition, said to be the then Secretary of Chudighar Panchayat, had expired on 10.08.2007; and it has been prayed that the present Secretary, the applicant, be joined as party to the writ petition. However, it is stated by the learned counsel appearing for the applicant that nothing further survives for consideration in this writ petition inasmuch as possession of the property in question has been delivered to the applicant by the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that for such statement being made on behalf of the applicant, 2 obviously, nothing further would survive for consideration in this writ petition that is rendered practically infructuous. In view of the submissions aforesaid, this writ petition is required to be dismissed as infructuous but to put the record straight, the application (IA No. 357/2008) is allowed and the applicant Shahid Ali is impleaded as party respondent to this writ petition. The writ petition is, however, dismissed as infructuous. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. Mohan/