IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14209 of 2009 1. REENA RAJ W/O RAJESH KUMAR VILL & P.O- BAMBHAWAR, P.S- PIRO, DISTT- BHOJPUR, ARA 2. SUSHMA DEVI W/O JAI KISHOR SINGH VILL & P.O- BAMBHAWAR, P.S- PIRO, DISTT- BHOJPUR, ARA 3. PRABHAWATI DEVI W/O MONU RAM VILL AND P.O- VANA JAMUNIPUR, P.S- AGIAON BAZAR, DISTT- BHOJPUR 4. PARWATI DEVI W/ VISHWANATH SINGH VILL AND P.O- VANA JAMUNIPUR, P.S- AGIAON BAZAR, DISTT- BHOJPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 09.11.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. Against the order of terminating passed by the District Programme officer on 18.8.2009 after show cause notice and reply filed by the petitioner there is adequate remedy of appeal before the District Magistrate. In view of alternative remedy available, if the petitioner prefers such an appeal before the District Magistrate within thirty days from today the District Magistrate is required to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order without going into the issue of limitation. If so advised and the petitioner prefers any application for interim relief the District Magistrate is obliged to dispose of the application for interim relief within a maximum period of seven to ten days so that the appeal itself may not become infructuous. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)