HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI SGARH AT BILASPUR $3 : HON’BLE SHRI JUSTECE PRITINKER DIWAKER ' W.P. N0. [227) 1831/2009 ETITIONER PLAINTIFF MfS Jal Enterpnses. Chhatta Karkhana Campus m front of LICI Building Pandri, Raipur (CG) Versus RESPONDENT Union of India, through the ' General Manager, South Eastg Central Railway, Bilaspur (CG) 1 PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CON$TITUTION ‘ OF INDIA Appearance: Shn' Alok Bakshi, counsel for the petitioner., Ms Nausheen Akin Ali Advocate appears on behalf of Shn Aunt Choudhary, Sr Standmg counsel for the respondent] Unlon of Indla ORAL 01mm (06.04.2009) The challenge in this writ petition is the order dated , 14.08.2008 passed by Presiding Odicer, Jan Upayogi Permanent Lok Adalat, Bilaspur whexeby the authority has ’ refused to entertain the complaint] application tiled by the r petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order impugned be set aside: and the court below be directed ‘ to entertain the complaint] application. / P , 3. Under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, this Court cannot direct any of the authority to entertain such petition. The scope of interferen‘ e under Article 227 of the Constitution is well defined and 1t cannot be sketched to the extent Whele any interference can be made like the present case, Even othenzvise, it is not a ‘case where the petitioner is ' remediless, The petitioner can avail the ,femedy available l under the law if so, advised. u ( 4. ame i miss V s s dised. Sd/- /\ 'Pritinker Diwaker i Jlig Accordingly, the petition has no substance (and the de