IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31680 of 2010 1. RAJO SAH @ RAJENDRA SAH 2. DURO DEVI 3. MUKESH SAH ------------------------ PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 26.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners is pressing the application for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner nos. 2 and 3 only as petitioner no.1 Rajo Sah @ Rajendra Sah has already been arrested. Death of the deceased is due to burn injury. Torture soon before the death within seven years of marriage in matrimonial house is there. To counter the same, submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that for two years after marriage there was everything O.K., there was neither demand nor torture. Thereafter torture appeared but for demand of dowry. A vague allegation is there against these petitioners about causing torture but husband and father-in-law are specified for making demand and several witnesses are there to state that she (deceased) set herself on fire. She was taken to hospital, remained there for several 2 days then only she died. Stress is made that no demand ever was made by these petitioners. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner nos. 2 and 3 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in Balia P.S. Case No. 59/10, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)