IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 26796 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 18.10.2011 Ratto and others .. Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Padamkant Dwivedi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K. S. Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. ... Rajesh Bindal J. While issuing notice of motion, following contentions of learned counsel for the petitioners were noticed: “Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners, who are the ladies, have been falsely implicated in this case. Civil litigation is pending regarding the land, the possession of which was being allegedly delivered to Gram Panchayat by the Govt. officials. No injury as such has been attributed to the petitioners.” It is not disputed that the petitioners have joined investigation. Considering the fact that the petitioners are ladies, the interim bail granted by this court on 5.9.2011 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 18.10.2011 mk