IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY W.P.No.15847 of 2005 Between: M/s. Hazi Mohammed Yasin. …Petitioner. And The Principal Secretary to Government, Roads & Buildings Department, Govt.of A.P., Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and others. …Respondents. COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER : Mr. S.Gopal Rao COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS : G.P. for Roads & Buildings. The Court made the following order : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.15847 of 2005 O R D E R : This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to issue Administrative Sanction with Letter of Credit for arrangement of payments to the petitioner for execution of the temporary illumination works from 7-6-2005 to 9-6-2005 during Fish Medicine Programme along with interest. According to the petitioner, as per the work order of the respondent authorities, the petitioner executed the temporary illumination works on 7th, 8th and 9th June, 2005 for which the respondents have to pay the amounts, which the respondents have agreed to pay as per the proceedings dated 1-6-2005 of the fourth respondent. But, however, the grievance of the petitioner is that after the execution of the works, the respondents did not pay the amounts in spite of repeated representations. Therefore, the petitioner has come up with the present writ petition. When this matter came up for admission on the last occasion, the learned Government Pleader for Roads & Buildings was directed to get instructions in the matter. Now on instructions, it is represented by the learned Government Pleader that the petitioner had executed the works. However, there is a delay on the part of the respondents for obtaining the Administrative Sanction for effecting the payments. Therefore, sought reasonable time for effecting the payments. Heard both sides and considered the material on record. As admittedly the petitioner had executed the works entrusted to him by the respondents, the respondents are obligated to effect the payment for the works executed by the petitioner. Therefore, it would be proper to direct the respondents to obtain necessary sanction and effect the payment to the petitioner within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of at the admission stage. _______________________ (S.ANANDA REDDY,J) 25-07-2005. Msr. HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.15847 of 2005 25-07-2005 (Msr)