IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6440 of 2010 Date of decision: October 04, 2010. Sukhwant Singh Sidhu ...Petitioner(s) v. S. Ranjodh Singh Sandhu & Anr. ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Shri Sarabjit Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia , J. (Oral): Present petition has been filed against the order of Rent Controller, Amritsar dated 3.5.2010, whereby he has dismissed the application, wherein a prayer was made that additional affidavit and documents tendered by Sandeep Singh Brar be de-exhibited. Sandeep Singh Brar has filed an eviction petition as attorney of Ranjodh Singh, who, at the relevant time, was aged 85 years. During the pendency of eviction petition, Sandeep Singh Brar had tendered his affidavit as an attorney of Ranjodh Singh. Later on, Ranjodh Singh expired. He had made a Will in favour of one Kanwaljot Kaur. Sandeep Singh Brar is the attesting witness to the Will. Application under Order 22 Rule 3 CPC was allowed subject to proof of Will. Since Sandeep Singh Brar was attesting witness to the Will, therefore, he tendered additional affidavit, which was permitted by the Court. Therefore, subsequent additional affidavit tendered is regarding the subsequent event. Thus, no fault can be found with the well reasoned order, impugned herein, passed by the Rent Controller, Amritsar and the present petition is dismissed., in limine. [Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia] October 04, 2010. Judge kadyan