[1] IN THE HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 812 OF 2003 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 124 OF 2003 Rahul Bajaj .... Appellant. [Orig. Petitioner.] Versus. Salco Securities & .... Respondents Financial Services [Orig. Respondents.] Ltd. & Anr. Mr. Zal Andyarujina i/b. Dhru & Co. for the appellant. Mr. S.V.Kamdar Sr. Advocatewith S.S.Purohit i/b. Purohit & Co. for the respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : D.K.Deshmukh and : D.K.Deshmukh and : D.K.Deshmukh and A.A.Sayed, A.A.Sayed, A.A.Sayed, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : January 19, 2009. : January 19, 2009. : January 19, 2009. P.C. 1. By consent of the parties, the order passed by the learned Single Judge and the Award made by the Arbitral Tribunal is set aside. The Arbitration department of the National Stock Exchange, by consent [2] of the parties is directed to refer the dispute between the parties to a new Arbitral Tribunal. 2. All contentions available to both the sides are kept open to be urged before the New Arbitral Tribunal. 3. In view of this, notice of motion No. 3187 of 2003 does not survive and is disposed of. [D.K.Deshmukh, [D.K.Deshmukh, [D.K.Deshmukh, J.] J.] J.] [A.A.Sayed, [A.A.Sayed, [A.A.Sayed, J.] J.] J.]