THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No. 22594 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioners challenge a notification dated 07-09-2010 issued by the 3rd respondent, proposing to conduct elections to the Managing Committee of the A.P. Fishermen Co-operative Societies Federation Limited (for short ‘the Federation’), the 4th respondent herein. The petitioners state that there used to be a four-tier structure for the Federation, till the year 1995, and by virtue of an amendment adopted at a general body meeting of the Federation, substantial changes were effected. One of them is that a three-tier structure is brought into existence. Reference is made to a judgment rendered by this Court, in W.P.No.11688 of 2008, in which, the said amendment was set aside. The petitioners point out that certain important aspects were not brought to the notice of this Court, when W.P.No.11688 of 2008 was decided, and the proposed elections suffer from legal and factual infirmities. Sri P. Venugopal, learned counsel for the petitioners has addressed extensive arguments to buttress the plea of the petitioners. Learned Advocate-General, who appeared for the respondents, on the other hand, submits that the impugned notification is issued in pursuance of the judgment of this Court, in W.P.No.11688 of 2008, and the initiation of suo motu contempt proceedings. The bye-laws of the Federation are said to have been amended in the year 1995. However, the competent authority under the A.P. Cooperative Societies Act (for short ‘the Act’), registered them in the year 2007. Those amendments were challenged before this Court, in W.P.No.11688 of 2008. The matter was examined at length, with reference to the relevant records. A finding was recorded to the effect that the so-called amendment has not taken place, in accordance with law. Another legal infirmity is that the registration of the bye-laws was made contrary to Section 16(2) of the Act; and the amendment was set aside, and a direction was issued to the competent authority to conduct election to the Managing Committee of the Federation, as early as possible. In pursuance of the directions, the impugned notification is issued. The various grounds urged by the petitioners, in a way, touch the very correctness of the judgment in W.P.No11688 of 2008. If the petitioners feel aggrieved by the judgment, they have to file Writ Appeal, duly seeking the leave of the Court. Quite good number of review petitions filed by the respondents herein, as well as private parties were rejected by this Court. There are no merits in the writ petition. It is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.24-09-2010. KO