SPLA No. 57 / 10 With G.A. No. 45 of 2010 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon. Nirmal Yadav, J. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder, present for the appellant State. Heard. This appeal, preferred under Section 378(3) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is directed against the judgment and order dated 13.07.2010, passed by Addl. Sessions Judge / First Fast Track Court, Haridwar, in Sessions Trial No. 455 of 2008, whereby respondents Fajla, Smt. Tunni and Nafees have been acquitted of the charge of offences punishable under Section 304-B and 201 of I.P.C. Perusal of the impugned order shows that the trial court convicted husband Anees on the charge of offences punishable under Section 304-B and 201 of I.P.C., but acquitted the respondents Fajla (father-in- law of the deceased), Smt. Tunni (mother-in-law of the deceased), and Nafees (brother-in-law of the deceased). It is evident from the discussion of the evidence mentioned by the trial court that marriage of Rani (deceased) with Anees was a love marriage, and they used to live separately from their in-laws. In the circumstances, the trial court found that it is not proved on the record that the respondents Fajla, Smt. Tunni or Nafees have subjected the deceased to cruelty for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the appellant, and after going through the impugned judgment and order, we do not find it to be a fit case for granting leave to appeal. The leave is refused. (Special Leave to Appeal Application No. 57 of 2010 stands disposed of). Consequently, the appeal also stands dismissed summarily. (Nirmal Yadav, J.) (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 23.09.2010 HN