.1 ,~.. HIGH GQURT OF JUDICATURE CHHAH15GARH : BILA5PUR DIWSION BENCH CORAM : HON’BLE SHRI SR. NAYAK, CJ. HQN’BLE SHRI V.K. SHRIVA$TAVA, J. Wr§t Fetition (C) No.5370 GF 2006 PETITQOMER M/s RD‘ Constructians, Partnership mm, having their office at Shop No‘ 61— 62, Farishta compiex‘ GE. Road Raipur‘ represented by Mr. Satish Chhugani aged about 28 years, Son of Shri K.L. Chhugani, resident of ~A—1 O, Gayatri Nagar, (Shanker Nagar) Raipur CG. Versus §ESPONDEB§T$ State Government 0f CG, through 1. The Secretary, Public Works Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantrataya, RaipurC.G. 2. The Executive Engineer, North Bastar Division, PWD, Jagdaipur CG, Present: Shri PIKI Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Pashant Mishra,’ learned Addl. AG. with Shri Utkarsh Verma, learned Dy. GA for the State of Chhattiegarh. QRAL ORDER (Paseed on 10-1’i-2005) The following oral order of the Court wae passed by SR. Nayak, (sail The petitioner without resorting to the arbitral procedure in terms of arbitration clause in the agreement and without working out remedy available under Section 9 of the Arbitration 8: Conciliation Act 1996 has straightway approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of tndia. Having heard iearned counsel for the petitioner, we do not find any substantive which could persuade us to permit the petitioner or weighty ground persuade us to bypass statutorya'”; remedy and rush to this Court under Article 225 of of On that short this writ is dismissed. No Constitution of lndia, On that short ground, writ petition costs, l ' Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Sd!~ Judge Chief Justice Kama/e