IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9067 of 2011 BIDYANAND RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 29.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Initially, son of the petitioner filed a complaint case bearing Complaint Case No. 2095 of 2010 against in-laws and husband of the deceased. The aforesaid complaint case was converted into Mahua P.S. Case No. 395 of 2010. It appears that in course of investigation of the above stated case, the petitioner’s name surfaced. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is none else but own uncle of the deceased and, as a matter of fact, the police twisted the investigation in favour of the named accused persons of this case. It is also contended by him that admittedly, the deceased died within four-walls of the house of her in- laws and the post mortem report does not disclose the definite cause of the death. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with above stated Mahua P.S. Case No. 395 of 2010. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)