a “l; C p. W g, .4 SINGLE BENCH iN THE HiéH COURT OF .TUDIC‘ATU‘RE AT BILASPUR] .. WRIT PETiTIo ' s) No. 212$? of 2009 / PETiTiONER Tiju Ram VNag, ;son of Pankunafh Pq'fankar', aged“: ' aboui’ 67 years,- Refir-ed". Headmasfer: residenf of Viiiage Giroia, Tehsii Kandagaon, DisTr-icf Basfar (Chha‘rfisgar‘h) /‘ of ChhaHisgarh, 1. S‘m‘re ~ Throuqh RE5PON$ENT "the $” Depqm‘menf 9 Secre'rary, of Higher WRIT ?ETTTTON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE / CGN’sT‘iTUTioN or- INDIA‘ ‘ IV ‘ .L m J °) \ _... Manfralaya, Rnipur'. 2. The 'Accoun’rgnf General, W36$ L ’ Chha'H’isgarh, Raipur‘ (CG). K 3. The Black Deveiopmenf Educa‘Hon Officer, Makdir, 'DisTr-iw Basfar KG) r- Writ g§etiti0§1 i8} Na ?259 cf 299% Tiju Ram Nag PETWIONER Governmem of Chhattisgarh arid ethers}, and mder dated i3-3-2Gi3’8 paseed Ea M.C.Q No. 1% 0f 291138 {Staie ef Qh‘hattisgath and nihes’s Vs. Baijnaih NiemiaE end aeeiher}. E‘hua thie petitwn is squareiy cevereci by me iudgmentene arder daiee‘ 31“ January, H§GH SGURT OF $HHATT§8GARH : ESLASPUR Versus RESPGixmENTS Staie of Chhaitisgarh & whats (Wr§€ Peiition underkiick 22% 9f the Cmasi§imioiz o§ inciéa) ‘ Singie Behch : H‘on’me Shri Satish K. Agnihetri, .5. Present : Ms S%arm,§§a Singhai, csunse§ far the petitioner. :‘5hri ¥.$. T%‘.a‘ku3',Dy. miv. Qenera§ for the State. Ms a‘cuzia MirzaJASSR 8oé§cémr Gemrag f0? me Gnian a? Inmairespondem No.2. GRDER 'GRAL gPassed era this 14 d‘ay of December, 29%) a. With the censent Gf‘ iaamed cmmsei for the partieg tha peiiticm is heard finaihf. 2. T'r‘zis ¢ase gser€ams is grievance 9f nen-gi’an‘t of retimi' eaes. Learneci counse! agpearing fer the ge‘iéticnen 4m instruciians, submits that the matter may be refewed ta: t‘he §easian Commiitee. 3. This Souft, in WPNeAGewWM-(aaijnath Maedai Vs. The Siaie of Chhattisgarh & cihers) aad omer cannected maéiers, directed ihe / Commmee t0 consi‘ier the matter mf i‘eirie! duee as the dispu‘ted question of facts weave invoiveti, Yhe Cemmittee was ccnstimtee by the Staie Govemmem, pursuant a) the oreesr tieied 1§-96-2¥3i36 i ' easeed §n W.P.No.3961!2¢39$ iSmt. Kega BeHSheradmkaa’ Vs. $iate ‘/ W 2868 passed in WPNG. 4542i26£34 (Baijmth Mandai {supra} a3 submmed by ieameé caungei appeariim hr ihe Eaiiies. This petiticn is accm'a'jiiagay d§spaseci cf m ihe same tenns i.e., the offace of ihe Advucaie Genera} is directed to send the caee to the Commii‘kee, withm a §er§oé of ‘i5 {iays frem ihe date cf rece€pt a§ a com; of this order. Thereafter. me 39mmmee shail issue netice :0 ‘che peiitiener aed officers cancemee wmmn a farmer permd a? 15 éaye. The Committee shai! mnsider and pass orden in accorqiarace with law, af€er afferdirig prcper epportunity of hearmg t0 the petmcnei The geeéiiiener aed the emeers concemed may fiEe addmonei documems. if necessary. The entire exerciee, incieding paymem o$ reiirai ewes, if awry} te ihe peiitizmeri be cemweteei withan a yeried ef fem months from ta’ie date oi rece§pt of a ceey cf this wdet 5. The peti‘tioeer sha!! supew we cemwete set 0f the pe€i€ien t0 the Staie ceuese! as we“ as ccensei Em the {mama 0i ledia fer 4:. transferring the same €e *the Commmee. re Jx/‘W Sd/- I ‘ g5atish K.Agnihotri . x, I, r‘ J e w, y f x‘ Judge ‘ \w , r j 1 , f"4 &;»j’ ..//I ’4 1,, \