IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2011/29TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WPC.No. 34068 of 2011 (G) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ ANUMOL BABY, NELLIKKAMANNIL,N.G.O.QUARTERS, MANANTHAVADY P.O WAYANADU DISTRICT -670 645 BY ADV. SRI.N.SASIDHARAN UNNITHAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL ADMINISTRATION(SERVICE-D) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM .PIN-695 001 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SHAIJ RAJ.T.K. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-12-2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.34068/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION NO.72859/SDI/2009/GAD DATED 4/9/2010 OF THE RESPONDENT. P2 COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE ASSOCIATION OF INDIAN UNIVERSITIES. P3 COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE KERALA CRICKET ASSOCIATION. P4 COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY KERALA CRICKET ASSOCIATION. P5 COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY KERALA CRICKET ASSOCIATION. P6 COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 23/2/2011 OF THE RESPONDENT. P7 COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DATED 2/11/2011 PUBLISHED IN THE KERALA GAZETTE. P8 COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 13/12/2011 OF THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No.34068 of 2011. = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 20th December, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner has filed this writ petition claiming appointment in Government service under the sports quota. According to the petitioner, she is an outstanding sports person who has various achievements to her credit in the discipline of Cricket. She is also a graduate from Calicut University. She is an applicant for appointment to Government service in the sports quota. She complains that she had submitted Exts.P2 to P5 certificates evidencing her achievements in the field of sports. On the basis of the said certificates, she was called for an interview held on 3.3.2011 by the respondents. Thereafter, a provisional list of candidates who were selected for appointment has been published as per Ext.P7. The petitioner's name is not included in the list. It is the contention of the petitioner that none of the candidates included in Ext.P7 have any of the WP(C).No.34068/2011. 2 achievements that the petitioner is possessed of. Therefore, the petitioner has submitted Ext.P8 representation setting out her grievances. However, she complains that the respondent has not considered the same nor passed any orders thereon. The petitioner therefore seeks the issue of appropriate directions for the consideration of Ext.P8. 2. I have heard the learned Govt. Pleader also. 3. In view of the limited relief that is sought, this writ petition is disposed of directing the representation of the petitioner to be considered. 4. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of directing the respondent to consider the grievances of the petitioner set out in her representation, evidenced herein by Ext.P8, in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner also. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, (Judge) Kvs/-