WP(C) 1988/2011 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C. UPADHYAY Heard Mr. SK Singha, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mrs. HN Phukan, lea rned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent No.1. Also heard Ms. R. Deka, learned SC, PWD appearing for respondent Nos. 2 to 5 as well as Mr. B. Gogoi, learned SC, Finance Department, appearing for respondent No.6. Considering the grievance raised in this writ petition and also as prayed for by the learned counsel for the parties, I proposed to dispose of this writ petitio n at the motion stage itself. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that the petitioner-firm has completed the entrusted work in time for phase II of the improvement works of ’Passy Garam pani Haflong Jatinga Road’ project. After completion of the work the petitioner- firm accordingly submitted all the bills to the concerned respondent authority. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner-firm that the respondent authorities has already made part payment of Rs.55,000/-. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent authorities has not paid the remaining outstanding dues amounting to Rs.1,13,000/-. It is also alleged by the petitioner-firm that the respondent No.5 has already prepared the chronolog ical list of liabilities of contractors dated 25.06.2010 for different phases of improvement works of Passy Garampani Haflong Jatinga Road and the name of the petitioner-firm has also been enlisted in the said list. But till date, the out standing admitted amount of liabilities has not been paid to the petitioner-firm inspite of having funds available with the Government for the said works. Hence the petitioner has approached this Court by filing the instant writ petition. It is admitted at the Bar that such payment of the contractors’ bill and the man ner and method to be dealt with in such cases has been rendered by a full bench of this Court in WA No.484/2008 and similar other 194 writ petitions reported in 2008(4) GLT 1(FB) : Tamsher Ali & Ors. vs State of Assam & Ors. and the issue i nvolved in the instant case is covered by the aforesaid decision. In view of the above, this writ petitin is disposed of with the directions that the petitioner as well as the respondent authorities shall be bound by the princ iple of law and directions as passed in the case of Tamsher Ali(supra) and the r espondent authorities shall deal with the grievance of the petitioner as per the directions contained in Tamsher Ali(supra) and pay the amount to the petitioner to which he is entitled. With the above directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.