IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.Rev. (T) No. 54 of 2008 Decided on: 29.10.2010 State of Himachal Pradesh and another …Petitioners. Versus Rakesh Kumar …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioners : Mr. P. M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For the respondent : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate vice counsel. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : The erstwhile learned Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal has disposed of the OA No. 1547 of 2000 on 30.7.2001 on the basis of the statement made by learned Additional Advocate General to the effect that the workman had completed nine years of service with minimum 240 days in each calender year and his case shall be considered for regularization within a period of four weeks. Moreover, Ms. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the workman stands regularized. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- 2. Consequently, there is no merit in the present petition and the same is dismissed being devoid of merits. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge October 29, 2010 (K. Attri)