IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5891 of 2010 UPENDRA PRASAD SHAH @ UPENDRA PRASAD . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 17.5.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the State. The offence alleged is under Sections 419,420,467,468,471 and 120B of the Indian Penal code. Counsel for the petitioner submits that son of the petitioner Vikash Kumar Gupta is responsible for commission of the offence. So far petitioner is concerned, he is neither loanee nor guarantor. His son has got sanctioned loan in his favour. Considering this fact, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner above named is allowed. In the event of his arrest/surrender within four weeks from today in the Court below, petitioner shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with 2 two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the ACJM, Patnacity in Chowk P.S. case No. 191 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.Kumar