IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 29TH AUGUST 2011 / 7TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 23515 of 2011(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SAJITHA, W/O.ISMAIL, AGED 29 YEARS, MULAKATHOTTIYIL HOUSE, VETTILAPARA, AREACODE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BABU S. NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PERINTHALMANNA, PIN-679 322. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE AREACODE POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673 639. SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC.23515/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE APPLICATION DT 16.8.11. // True Copy // P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 23515 of 2011 L ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 29th day of August, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ In this Writ Petition, the petitioner complains that his vehicle has been detained on the allegation that the vehicle was used for transportation of river sand in violation of the provisions contained in the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001. According to the petitioner, he has made application for interim custody of the vehicle but, his application was not considered. With this grievance, this Writ Petition has been filed. 2. A Full Bench of this Court in Shan C.T. Vs. State of Kerala [2010 (3) KHC 333] has laid down the manner in which such applications for interim custody should be dealt with. Therefore, all that is necessary in this Writ Petition is to direct the statutory authority, before whom the application has been made, shall deal with the application in the light of W.P.(C) No.23515/11 : 2 : the provisions of the Act referred above and in the manner as directed by the Full Bench of this Court in the judgment referred as above. Ordered accordingly. 3. Petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the concerned authority for appropriate action. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/29/08 // True Copy // P.A. To Judge