1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3333/2006 (Smt. Jagisa Vs. State & Ors.) Date of Order :: 20.05.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr.P.S. Chundawat, for the petitioner. Mr.Alkesh Agarwal, Dy. Govt. Counsel. Mr.Anil Bachhawat, for respondents Nos.4 and 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner was provided appointment vide order dated 06th July, 2002 (Annexure-1) passed by Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat-Rajgarh Panchayat Samiti, Sankada, District Jaiselmer on honorarium for preparation of food. Latter on, fresh selection was made vide order dated 21st September, 2005 by which Smt. Marium respondent No.5 was appointed as cook in place of petitioner. In this case, the petitioner is challenging the said order on the ground that without assigning any reason her appointment was cancelled and for the said purpose a revision was filed by her which is placed on record as Annexure-5. In reply to the writ petition filed by the respondents, it is submitted that petitioner was appointed for preparing food on honorarium, but certain complaints were received against her, therefore, a notice was given to the petitioner for seeking her explanation. But she has refused to accept the said notice, 2 therefore, the petitioner's appointment was rightly cancelled by the respondents which is not illegal. In this case, admittedly petitioner was appointed on honorarium for preparation of food and she was allowed to work for three years. Latter on upon complaints she was directed to file her explanation, but petitioner refused to even accept the notice given to her for explanation. In this view of the matter, no case for interference in the matter is made out. The petitioner is not holding any civil post and she was getting honorarium, therefore, there is no question of holding any inquiry. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS),J. A.K. Chouhan/- A.K. Chouhan/-