IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO. 360 OF 2006 APPEAL NO. 360 OF 2006 APPEAL NO. 360 OF 2006 .......................................................... Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearance, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and orders Registrar’s orders .......................................................... Mr. J.J. Xevier, for Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. : A.S. OKA, J. : A.S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 11TH AUGUST 2006 : 11TH AUGUST 2006 : 11TH AUGUST 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. None appears for the Appellants when the Appeal was called out. Therefore, the Appeal was kept back. On second occasion when the Appeal is called out none appears for the Appellant. Advocate for Respondent No.1 states that the application made for condonation of delay is rejected. 2. Dismissed for default. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE