IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.17836 of 2010 BETWEEN Mohd. Ghouse. ... PETITIONER AND The Director of Employement and Training, BRKR Bhavan, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad and two others. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. V. RAVIKIRAN RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING The Court made the following: ORDER: Petitioner states that he appeared for Trade Test in the Trade of Draughtsman Civil as private candidate in March 1999. It appears that he is working as Junior Technical Officer in the office of the Executive Engineer, R&B NH Division, Perkit, Nizamabad District. 2. Grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is that though he is qualified for the examination of All India Trade Test conducted by the National Council for Vocational Training scheduled to be held on 23.07.2010, his hall ticket was not sent by Regional Deputy Director (APP), Hyderabad to the Principal, Government ITI (Boys), Nizambad, to enable him to appear for the said examination. 3. This Court while admitting the writ petition on 23.07.2010 issued interim direction as prayed for and further directed that the result of the examination shall not be declared until further orders. 4. Petitioner has now filed WPMP.No.40045 of 2010 stating that though he has obtained the hall ticket, in view of the fact that the test commenced on 23.07.2010 and though the order of this Court also is of the said date, on account of the time taken in securing the hall ticket as per the interim direction, he could not appear for the test dated 23.07.2010. In other words, the examination scheduled on that date with regard to subject of Social Studies, could not be attempted by the petitioner and consequently, though he has appeared for the rest of the examinations, petitioner now accepts the position that his result would be ‘failed result’, as he has not appeared for one paper on 23.07.2010. He, therefore, submits that the supplementary examination is being conducted and the last date for payment of fees is on 14.12.2010. He, therefore, filed the present application on 07.12.2010 seeking declaration of results so that he can at least appear for the supplementary examination. His complaint is that though he knows the result and accepts that he would have failed in the said examination dated 23.07.2010, on account of the orders passed by this Court dated 23.07.2010 not to declare the results, even the fees for supplementary examination is not being accepted by the third respondent. 5. After hearing both sides and considering the facts, as above, in view of the fact that the petitioner himself has reconciled to the fact that he has failed in the said examination, the formal declaration of result would at least enable him to appear for the supplementary examination by paying the fees therefor. It would, therefore, be appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with the following directions: 1. The respondents shall declare the result of the petitioner relating to the examination held from 23.07.2010 to 29.07.2010 for the Trade Test conducted by the National Council for Vocational Training. 2. As the petitioner himself accepts that he has failed in the said test on account of non-appearance for first paper, petitioner shall be at liberty to appear for the supplementary examination scheduled to be held, though the last date for payment of fees for supplementary examination is also over by 14.12.2010. 3. Respondent No.3 shall accept the examination fees from the petitioner with late fee as per rules and permit the petitioner to appear for the supplementary examination. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J December 31, 2010 Note: Furnish C.C. of the order in one week. (B/o) DSK