IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-9801 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: July 29, 2010 Sanjay Kumar ...Petitioner Versus Smt. Veena ...Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present: Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Ghangas, Advocate, for the respondent. GURDEV SINGH, J. Heard. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is a change in the circumstances since passing of the impugned order by the Magistrate, as during the pendency of the application under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') itself, the respondent got herself gainfully employed by joining the service, which fact was never brought to the notice of the Magistrate. He further submits that an objection to that effect has already been taken by the petitioner in the execution application and that he wants to file an application under Section 127 of the Code on account of the change in the circumstances. He prays that he be permitted to withdraw this petition. Allowed. Dismissed as withdrawn. July 29, 2010 (GURDEV SINGH ) prem JUDGE