IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12720 of 2009 SANGEETA GUPTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 7.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the selection of respondent no. 8 on the post of Aganwari Sevika disregarding what the petitioner urges are her legitimate claims. The grievance raised by her in the matter has been enquired into by the District Welfare Officer and who by report dated 25.7.2008, at Annexure-5 to the writ application, has opined that her grievances appeared to be justified. Learned counsel for the State submits that if an enquiry report has been submitted to the District Magistrate, he is now required to take final decision thereupon in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed off with direction to respondent no. 3 to take a final appropriate decision in accordance with law on the enquiry report dated 25.7.2008 after hearing all concerned including respondent no. 8 within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)