IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11816 of 2009 LALAN PRASAD, Son of Late Kailash Mahto, Resident of Mokamaghat, Ward No. 16, Police Station- Mokama, District- Patna. :--- Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 2. The Finance Commissioner, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, patna. 3. The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Co-operative, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 4. The Registrar, Department of Co-operative Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 5. The Commissioner, Munger Division, Munger. 6. The District Magistrate, Khagaria :---- Respondents. ----------- 2. 08.09.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner earlier served as Paid Manager of the Primary Agricultural Credit Society. He has been absorbed against Class-III post in the State Government in compliance of the scheme formulated by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 7357 of 1996 disposed of under order dated 20.08.1998 after he became successful in the limited departmental examination conducted by Bihar Public Service Commission. The order absorbing the services of the petitioner is contained in Annexure-7. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that present writ application has been filed for a direction to the State-respondent to grant the petitioner the scale of Rs. 4,000-6000/- instead of Rs. 3050-4590/-. For similar relief, others similarly situate who were also absorbed against Class- III post in the State Government pursuant to the direction of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the aforesaid Civil Appeal No. 7357 of 1996 disposed of under order dated 20.08.1998 had come to this Court and this Court under judgment dated 26.07.2006 passed in C.W.J.C.No. 15417 of 2004 directed that person similarly situate be granted the scale of Rs. 4,000-6,000/- in place of Rs. 3050-4590/-. Highlighting the aforesaid aspect, petitioner has - 2 - filed representation with reference to the order passed in the aforesaid writ case which is also reported in 2007 PLJR (1) 159. The representation of the petitioner is dated 12.01.2009 and has been addressed to the District Magistrate, Khagaria and is contained in Annexure-8. 4. Let the petitioner file a fresh copy of the representation dated 12.01.2009 (Annexure-8) annexing the copy of the judgment of the High Court both in the writ petition as also in the L.P.A. and the District Magistrate consider the representation in the light of the order of the High Court in accordance with law as early as possible in any case within two months from the date of its receipt. It goes without saying that in the event representation of the petitioner is allowed he shall become entitled to higher scale of Rs. 4,000-6,000/- with effect from the date the same has been allowed to others similarly situate persons. 5. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J. )