IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 965 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 389 OF 2002 SHRI. VASSUDEV TAMBA ... Applicant Versus THE STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND 9 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Mahesh Sonak, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms. L. Dharwadkar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for Respondents No. 1,2,3,5 & 7. Coram:- D. B. BHOSALE & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 22nd January, 2008 P.C.: Heard learned Counsel for the Applicant and learned Counsel for Respondents No. 1,2,3,5 & 7. By this application, the Applicant has prayed for amendment of the petition in terms of the schedule. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A) and (B). Applicant to carry out amendment within a week from today. After the amendment is carried out, office is directed to issue notice to added Respondent No.11, returnable in four weeks from today. Applicant is directed to serve the amended petition on all the Respondents in the Writ Petition. Miscellaneous Civil Application is disposed of. D. B. BHOSALE, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. NH