IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRI APPA NO. 359 OF 2010. (STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR.PSO, PANCHPAOLI...VS... IMRAN @ IBRAHIM ASLAM KHAN & OTH.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. T.A.Mirza, A.P.P. for applicant. CORAM : A.P.LAVANDE AND P.D.KODE, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 03, 2010. Heard Mr. Mirza, learned A.P.P. for the appellant. By this application the applicant seeks leave to appeal against the judgment of acquittal passed by Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No.95 of 2009 acquitting the respondents of the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 302 r/w 149 and Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. In course of the trial the injured, who had filed first information report, turned hostile and was cross-examined by the prosecution. In so far as two eyewitnesses viz. Savita (P.W 2) and Diwya (P.W.3) are concerned, the learned trial Judge has refused to place reliance upon the testimonies on the ground that their statements were recorded after one week. Having heard the learned A.P.P. for the applicant and having perused the record, we are of the considered opinion that the reasons given by the learned trial Judge for acquitting the respondents cannot be said to be perverse warranting interference in the appeal against the acquittal. The view taken by the learned trial Judge is probable. Hence, the application is rejected. Consequently, the appeal also stands dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE RR.