IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7737 of 2008 JITENDRA MANDAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 13.05.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Besides the petitioner some other persons are accused of a case registered under Section 366 A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The report was given by the informant that his daughter Sadhna Kumari was enticed away. Submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is that the girl herself has gone and she was the consenting party and adult lady. So the petitioner is not liable for any offence. The girl has been recovered and in course of investigation she in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has stated how she was taken away. In course of that statement she has stated that she was raped by the petitioner during that period. Considering the fact, the petitioner Jitendra Mandal, I am not inclined to grant the prayer for bail. Accordingly the prayer for bail is rejected. The petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after examination of the victim. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)