IN THE HIGH COUJRT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1406 OF 2004 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 350 OF 2006 1. Shri Krishna Chango Patil (Since deceased through his legal heirs and Representatives): 1/a. Smt. Namibai Krishna Patil & Ors. ... Appellants Vs. 1. Shri Govind Joma Patil (Since deceased through his legal heirs); 1/1 Shri Harishchandra Patil & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Vyas i/b. M/s. Vyas & Bhalwal, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. K.N.Kore, Advocate, for the respondents Nos. 1/1, ½,1/3, 3A to 3G, 4, 5/1-6, 6 to 9. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 12th August, 2009. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The First Appeal filed by the present applicants is already admitted. There is a dispute as to whether the appellants are exclusive owners of the property which was acquired or whether the respondents have also shares as held by the reference Court. The reference Court held that the claimant Nos. 1 to 4 are entitled to 1/6th share each, while the others are also entitled to remaining share in the proportion mentioned in that order. This is the application to stay that order. In my opinion, the ends of justice will be met by the following order :- 3. The respondents i.e. the original claimants Nos. 5 to 13 shall furnish security to the satisfaction of the Reference Court while withdrawing the amount of compensation. In case, any plots are allotted to them by CIDCO under a Scheme called 12.5% Scheme, they shall not create any third party interest on the said plots pending the appeal. Application stands disposed of accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)