IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA,THE CHIEF JUSTICE WRIT PETITION NO : 16846 of 1994 Between: B.V.Narsinga Rao, S/o. Keshava Rao,aged about 59 years, R/o.H.No.5-83/C8, Vivekananda Nagar Colony, Kukatpally,R.R.Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Vice Chairman & Managing Director , Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, Begumpet, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner & Special Officer, Kukatpally Municipality,Kukatpally, R.R.Dist. 3 The Town Planning Officer, Kukatpally Municipality,Kukatpally, R.R.Dist. 4 The chief Town Planning Officer, Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, Begumpet, Hyderabad. 5 Sitarama Raju, S/o. .............. Plot No.31 ,Beside H.No.5-83/C8, Vivekananda Nagar Colony, Kukatpally,R.R.Dist. 6 Thandava Krishna , V.V.Rathna Rao, C/o. Janaki Ramaraju , Padmaja Apartments, Vivekananda Nagar Colony, Near V.S.K.School, Kukatpally,R.R.Dist. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ , order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus , declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 4 for not taking any action against the respondents 5&6 for constructing the buildings in utter violation of buildings regulations, 1981 and against the sanctioned plan, as illegal arbitrary and direct the respondent 1 to 4 to ensure and see that the 5th&6th respondents follow the building regulations and construct their respective buildings as per the sanctioned plan. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.PRABHAKAR RAO (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 4: MR.T.NIRANJAN REDDY Counsel for Respondent No.5: MR. B.NALIN KUMAR Counsel for Respondent No.6: MR.M.CHANDRASEKAR RAO Counsel for Respondents 2 & 3:SRI RAM KRISHNA MURTY, Standing Counsel for A.P.Municipalities The Court Made the Following Order: THE HONOURABLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA, THE CHIEF JUSTICE WRIT PETITION No. 16846 of 1994 ORDER: None for the petitioner. Petitioner sought direction against respondents 1 to 4 to take appropriate action against respondents 5 and 6 for having raised construction of building in violation of Building Regulations, 1981 and against the alleged sanctioned plan and sought further direction to take appropriate action in accordance with law. Commissioner, Kukatpally Municipality, Ranga Reddy District filed an affidavit mentioning the details of the constructions and of the action taken for demolition of the illegal constructions raised by the respondents 5 and 6. Separate affidavit was also filed by the Hyderabad Urban Development Authority. From the affidavit in reply, it can be seen that the respondent authorities have taken action in accordance with law. Since nobody is appearing for the petitioner, it appears, petitioner is no more interested in prosecuting the petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed No costs. 17th June, 2004 pnb Sd/- Assistant Registrar To 1. The Vice Chairman & Managing Director , Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, Begumpet, Hyderabad. 2 . The Commissioner & Special Officer, Kukatpally Municipality, Kukatpally, R.R.Dist. 3 The Town Planning Officer, Kukatpally Municipality,Kukatpally, R.R.Dist. 4 The chief Town Planning Officer, Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, Begumpet, Hyderabad. 5. 2 C.D. Copies