A tsim <?^A° ^^i'^Ni'. '••-^N. ^. ''" h?. • BiE H3BH G@WBT 0F WBleA'TOKE AT B2IASPtJK (03) ;^$ WS3.T PETXTIQN N0. 2o<2-& OF 2004 •BETWEBI 1. Kl^iori Lal 3/0 Badri Prasad aged abou-t 42 year^, by caste H.unhar •' residait of village Jarhi, O'etisU and Distrlct irguja (cs). 2. Sfaque J'bmed g^o Hyajuddin ggea about 35 years, by caste Musalman^ i/o village Jarhi, P.H.N0.17, 'Dahsil Pratap Rir District surguja (OS). ?ETIT3BSSRS .^^?\^ '.•••••""'.cri\ii0"v'v" V^-w'^'cw^^\"" -SND ee^;s'li]' 9JA^U p ((]£»-• ^? State of Chhattisgath, tihrough -tbe Seeretary Revenue , Mantralay, D.K.s.Building, Kaipur (03). 2. IS\e Board of Revenue, through its PreslSsa.t, BUaspur (03) . 3. ibe sub Divislonal Officer, Pra-t^p Pur ©istrict:Surguja (OG) 4. Ksite rohsildar, Pratappur, Tebsil Pratap Pur District Sirguja (03). Sv Siuwal g/o Ajju by caste Rajwsr. 6. 'vansh<3barl g/o Bichhu, by caste Bajwar . 7.^ Hansh Lal 3/0 JUgal by casta Rajwar. Sl.So.4 te> 7 resident. of village Jaihl, TOhsU Pratap Pur Disteict girguja (CG)* -.'-.^F RESBONDENTS .// tgigSi, VSTiyS38 VSDBR ARTICLSS 2S6/22T Q? TOE COHSII'EOTKai O? IHDtt J.^__i3ausfc^ XVSSS^ Sd^I'^1 Wi<h sn^r ^pNi ^rfld ;'3^ilBBtSs'ilBTSa;^ 3n^?r •qiFg? ^ p HWWI VKW Q^•^ 200 ^t^t' Sliri Awadh Tripafhi, Shri Utkarsh Veniia, Paj Tn§ petitioners have pr 226/227 of the Constitution 31.5.2004 passed by the S.D.] also agaiast fhe arbitrary act Revenue, Bilasp-ar. The case of fhe petition^ Abadi laad bearmg Khasra respondent Nos. 6 & 7 aad ba| aaiaes of tiie petitioners was However, respondent No.5 pre^ Pratapur aad learaed S. D.0. aside the order of inutation aiicl the possession of fhe land to by tuat order tae petitioners lij Board of Reveiiue. !n that ai as on the auulication t cottnse adel W 15,06.2004 but tffl date 110 Jc* tetl sieantiias, aU the laaterials k^ constnicted on fhe dispu.te respondeiT.t No.5. Leamed coiinsel for thel Board of Reyenue is not passul ou account of fb.at f!ie petitiQn^ passu^g •fii'illd'iil'i ^iwi-if fl fetzlr <i<ii<i!< ^sipOTaii^r •l for the petitioner. Lawt-er for the State. iferred tais peution uiider Articls of India agauist the onier daied -)., Pratapiu", District Sarguja and OQ of res-oondent No.2- Board of a'1 trs. is ui.at tiigy iiaci Durcna-sc'ci 031 Nos. 1136/3 6s 1138/2 irosi sed on fae registered sale deed fhe inutated in the revenue records. lerred aa appeal before ihe S,D.0., [vide omer dated 31.05.2004 set } also passed an order to haiid over |~espondent No.5. Eeing aggrieved li^ve preferred an appeal before f!ie ipeal ajrgimients on adinission as ifar gran.t of stay were heai-d on nn.al orier is passed, In the ipt by fhe petitionsrs in tlie hotel laad have been fhrowii bv petitioners subniits that leanied .g aay order siiice 15.06.2004 aiid rs are facing great difSculties. a ^•.y^-^^^^'''v:'»!:' XI-HC-22 an^i^T WM Sf^V St)Hi°t) ^ff^rt '3^';^PIRP(, afll'M'i®,fqciwy /^3: sn^?r ^ra^? IIIMI aiiich •M 200 fq^sr' sn^r ?1raT<iT ^ifer i|U~K It is surprisiiig fh.at tiie back aiid tffl date no order U Revenue aad on account of wl]|i< difficulties. The Board of Revenli indefirdte period witliout passii^ the arguinents were heard cii'cuinstaiices, 'fhe Board o| appropriate orders in fhe zaatt^ penod of two weeks ii-oia the d^ A CO-DV of fhis order be| Revenue for taMng appropriate With. the above obserysjt stands disposed of. ConsequenUy, M.W.P. N4 staad disposed of, Certi&ed copy as per Rul^s. +i'i<f^<ii-) iiro^f ^ feist <rai«f< ^7 arfigiT aii^i irgtUaents were heard w.'o iiionths las been passed by tlie Boai-d of KQ. t&e petinoners ai'e tacuig great \de cannot keep tlie fsle pending for ig auy order aad particularty T?hen aiid order reserved. In the Revenue is directed to pass ;r m. accordaiice wifh law within a [te ol receiot of this order. sent to the. Cnairmaa, Boaixl of ^cnon ia the iiiatter. |tion and directions, the petitiors. 1.1830/2004 & I.A, No.4768/2004 Sdf- L.C. Bhadoo Judge — B^