-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.8069 of 2004 S P Kharat..Petitioner vs Controller of Exm MUHS Nasik & ors.respdts with Writ Petition No.8094 of 2004 Praveen Ganpati Bharati. petitioner vs Controller of Exms MUHS Nasik and ors..respdts with Writ petition No.8ll9 of 2004 Shikalgar Anees Lohar F B.. petitioner vs Controller of Exams MUHS Nasik & ors..respdts with Writ petition no.8l20 of 2004 Amol Sadashiv Naphade .. petitioner vs Controller of Exams MUHS Nasik and ors...respdts with Writ Petition no. 8l2l of 2004 Parag Chandrakant Paradkar.. petitioner vs Controller of Exams MUHS Nasik and ors..respdts Mr L M Acharya for petitioners Mr.R.V.Govilkar for respondent nos.l and 2 CORAM: A.P.SHAH & S.C DHARMADHIKARI JJ. CORAM: A.P.SHAH & S.C DHARMADHIKARI JJ. CORAM: A.P.SHAH & S.C DHARMADHIKARI JJ. Dated 26.l0.2004 Dated 26.l0.2004 Dated 26.l0.2004 P.C: Heard advocates. Perused the affidavit filed on behalf of the University. The University has reconsidered the issue of punishment and paras 3 -2- and 4 of the earlier resolution have been deleted and the amended order reads as follows: "i) The Principal, Center Incharge, Center Observer and Jt Supervisor Dr P M Somade should jointly lodge an FIR in the Local Police Station to take suitable action on the subject. The FIR should be lodged within a week under the Maharashtra Prevention of Mal-practices at University, Board and other Specified Examinations, Act, l982 as per the provisions of Rule 65.l2.l5 of Ordinance l/2002 (amended) ii) The concerned 5 students’ performance of June/July 2004 examination is to be cancelled in full, in all subjects and exclusion from one additional examination i.e. October/ November, 2004 examination as per provisions of Rule 65.l2.l5 of Ordinance l/2002(amended)." In view of the decision taken by the University nothing survives in these petitions. Petitions are accordingly disposed of.