IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9098 of 2009 ARVIND SHARMA, S/o Kameshwar Sharma Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 10.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is land dispute in between the parties. The allegation of theft is super added allegation, while firing has been shown shot by this petitioner, but did not hit anyone. Only it is skill that firing has been shown resulting into falling of the informant’s son to bear its sound but in any case petitioner’s arrest cannot be justified. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Daudnagar P.S. Case No. 249 of 2008, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Aurangabad subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)