IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 1ST PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 5506 of 2008(E) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ---------- K.S.MOHANDAS, PROPRIETOR M/S.S.M.CONSTRUCTION, AVITTANALLUR KOTTALIDA, CALICUT DIST. BY ADV. SRI.T.V.GEORGE SRI.JIMMY GEORGE (THADATHIL) RESPONDENTS: ----------- 1. COMMERCIAL TAX INSPECTOR COMMERCIAL TAX CHECK POST, WALAYAR. 2. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER COMMERCIAL TAX CHECK POST, WALAYAR. 3. THE INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER COMMERCIAL TAX CHECK POST, WALAYAR. 4. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. M/S. T.V.SUNDARAM IYENGAR & SONS LIMITED NATIONAL HIGHWAY, KALOOR, KOCHI-682 017. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.C.K.GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).NO.5506/2008 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of February, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner submits that a Hydraulic Mobile Crane which he was using in Kerala was taken to Tamil Nadu for repairs. When it was brought back, the same was detained by Ext.P8. The irregularities noticed in Ext.P8 that there were no supporting documents to indicate that the crane in question was taken for repairs. At this stage, the counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to take it back to Tamil Nadu. If that be so, there could not be any objection to the respondents to release the vehicle. Therefore, if the petitioner wants to take back the crane to Tamil Nadu, it shall be released to the petitioner. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE vi. 2