061 H W3 W Q I?” Writ Peti‘tion una’er Arti ie 226/227 of the Constituiian of india SB Hon’ble Eghri Bhiremi a Mishra, J. G5. 1 1 .ZGiig Mr. BF. Rae; counsel Tor the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, PL for the State/respondents. Heard. learned counsel appearing for the partiee, petition i5 heard finallv. Learned counsel appe aring for the petitioner submite that v for the present the petitioner may be given an opportunity of m WEI; 200 anew um; (We) With the consent - of mamm ammmmm' mmWanésl Wam'a'wm wwmsr PETITIONER Vijay Pratap Singh Banjara, S/O Late S.L. Banjare, Aged about 38 years, Employad as AS$ista11t Grade—HI, ‘CommLulity Health Centr ‘ , Dhanldha; Distt. Durg (CG) Versus RESPONBENTS 1. $tate o Chhattisgarh, Throu 1 the Director, Directorate of Hsalth Sawice“, Raipm‘ 492001 (CG) 2. "311$ Cf ief Medical 83 Heaith Oftica‘, Durg. 3. T116 Ci il SSLu‘geon; Community H€alth Centa‘, Dhalndna, Dist. Durg. anéstm féqi'cs H211 anéetma; WWW ma WWé‘WW e mma fililié thé d€tailed represaltation before the competent authority. appearing for the State has no to which learned counsel objection; Havingwonsidered anl Without expressing any opinion on ends of justice Wiii be served E iib‘ rty is granted to the petitioner to make a detailed representation raising his grievances before the compeiem amhority of the respondents along with a copy of the petition and this order, Witl‘in a period of One month from today and on such representation being filed: the competent authority of the respondents may decide the same on its own merits, in aceordanoe with law, as early as possible preferably within. a period of three months representation. With the aforesaid observation, the petition is disposed of. from the date of receipt of the Dhirendra Mishra Judge Sd/— i m mqi$ I.-III-n...-II-I-III-IIIII-I-nulurlu «1200 anéeim (W) the merits of the case, in the opinion of this Court,