IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1104 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO.2949 OF 2005 Parag R. Kotadia ....Plaintiff Versus Rajnikant H. Mehta & Ors. ....Defendants None for the Plaintiff. Mr. A. Dasgupta i/b. M/s. J.Narula & Associates, Advocates for Defendant Nos.1 & 2. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATE : 23RD NOVEMBER, 2009. P.C. : The notice of motion was placed for order on 13th April, 2007, however, the learned Counsel for the Defendants made a grievance that a copy of the notice of motion is not served upon the Defendants. This Court, therefore, directed the learned Counsel for Plaintiff to serve a copy of the notice of motion upon the Defendants, within a period of six weeks. 2. Today, none appears on behalf of the Plaintiff. Mr. Dasgupta, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Defendant Nos. 1 and 2, makes a grievance that inspite of the order dated 13th April, 2007, a copy of the notice of motion has not been served upon the Defendants by the Plaintiff. It seems that the Plaintiff is not interested in prosecuting the notice of motion. The notice of motion is therefore, dismissed in default. Sd/- (R. V. MORE, J.)