WP(C) 3379/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. R.P. Sarmah, learned Sr. counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Choud hury, learned standing counsel Education Department appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Mr. Chetry, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.4. The petitioner, who is one of the respondents in the proceeding before t he Assam Administrative Tribunal by the present petition has challenged the comm on order dated 14.06.2011 passed by the learned Members in Appeal Case No.11ATA/ 2011, wherein and whereunder the prayer for amendment of the pleadings in the me morandum of appeal filed has been allowed, apart from rejecting the application filed by the petitioner for vacation/modification of the interim order passed on 15.03.2011 by the learned Tribunal has been rejected. It appears from the impugned order dated 14.06.2011 that the typographic al mistake occurred in the memorandum of appeal filed by the present respondent No.4 relating to the dates was allowed to be amended. The learned Tribunal has a lso observed that such amendment is necessary to decide the dispute between the parties effectively and completely and the respective dates of obtaining the gra duate scale of pay would naturally be verified from record at the appropriate st age. By the said order, for the reasons given, the interim order passed on 15.03 .2011 is also refused to be vacated. The discretionary order passed by the learned Tribunal is normally not o pen to challenge in a writ petition. The Tribunal has cited the reasons for refu sing to vacate the interim order dated 15.03.2011 that apart as noticed above, t he learned members have found that the amendment as sought for is necessary for effective disposal of the dispute between the parties and the date of receiving the graduate scale of pay would naturally be verified from the records to be pro duced by the State. In view of the above, I do not find any ground to interfere with the ord er dated 14.06.2011 passed by the learned Members, Assam Administrative Tribunal and hence the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs.