IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11989 of 2010 1. KALESHWAR BHAGAT @ Kaleshwar Prasad Bhagat SON OF LATE RAMSHARAN BHAGAT 2. Nandani Devi WIFE OF KALESHWAR BHAGAT. 3. DILIP KUMAR @ DILIP KUMAR BHAGAT SON OF KALESHWAR BHAGAT. 4. RUPAK RANJAN @ RUPAK BHAGAT @ RUPAK KUMAR BHAGAT SON OF KALESHWAR BHAGAT. ALL OF THEM ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BADHAIYA, P.S. BIHARIGANJ, DISTRICT MADHEPURA. ---- PETITIONERS. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. SRIMATI USHA DEVI WIFE OF ASHOK KUMAR BHAGAT, DAUGHTER OF INDRADEO PRASAD BHAGAT, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PATHRAHA, P.S. KUMARKHAND, DISTRICT MADHEPURA.--- OPP.PARTIES. with Cr.Misc. No.14667 of 2010 ASHOK KUMAR BHAGAT @ MUNNA BHAGAT SON OF KALESHWAR PRASAD BHAGAT, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BADHAIYA, P.S. BIHARIGANJ, DISTRICT MADHEPURA.-- -- PETITIONER. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. SRIMATI USHA DEVI WIFE OF ASHOK KUMAR BHAGAT, DAUGHTER OF INDRADEO PRASAD BHAGAT, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PATHRAHA, P.S. KUMARKHAND, DISTRICT MADHEPURA.--- OPP.PARTIES. ----------- For the petitioners : Mr.Vikramdeo singh with Mr. Sunil Kr. Singh, Advocates. For the State : Mr. R.N.Jha, A.P.P. ----- 2 03.05.2010 Mr. Vikramdeo Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, states that during the pendency of Cr. Misc. No. 11989 of 2010 petitioner No.3, Dilip Kumar @ Dilip Kumar Bhagat, has been apprehended by the police. Therefore, his prayer for anticipatory bail has become infructuous. Accordingly, the petition filed by petitioner No.3 is - 2 - dismissed as withdrawn. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioners. Let it be kept on record. Heard the parties. In a criminal prosecution, for offence under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioners in Cr. Misc. No. 11989 of 2010 are in-laws of the complainant and petitioner in Cr. Misc. No.14667 of 2010 is the husband. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that now the matter has been compromised between the parties and the complainant is living along with them in the family. In that view of the matter, the petitioners seek permission to withdraw both the applications. Permission is accorded. Both the applications are dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioners of both the cases must surrender in the court below in connection with Complaint Case No. 314C of 2009, pending in the court of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura, within a period of four weeks from today and, if so advised, seek regular bail, which shall be disposed of on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order and also by looking into all the materials available on record. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J ) BTiwary/