IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 23RD NOVEMBER 2010 / 2ND AGRAHAYANA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 7447 of 2010() ------------------------------------------- (CRIME NO.915/2010 OF KOYILANDY POLICE STATION,KOZHIKODE DIST.) ...... PETITIONERS:ACCUSED NOS.1, 3 AND 4: --------------------------------------------------------------- 1. NISSAR,S/O.,MOIDEENKOYA,AGED 19 YEARS, KIZHAKKEKOOTTIL HOUSE, KANNANKADAVU, CHEMANCHERRY, KOYILANDY TALUK. 2. PRENAV, S/O. SREEDHARAN, AGED 20 YEARS, THAZHEVALAPPIL HOUSE, THIRUVANGOOR AMSOM, KOYILANDY TALUK. 3. SHAMUSUDDIN, S/O. ABDUL KAREEM, AGED 19 YEARS, KACHIYIL HOUSE, THIRUVANGOOR AMSOM, VENGALAM DESOM, KOYILANDY TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.K.ABDUL JAWAD RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANTS: ----------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOYILANDY POLICE STATION, KOYILANDY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.S. HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V. RAMKUMAR, J. .................................................... Bail Application No. 7447 of 2010 ..................................................... Dated this the 23rd day of November, 2010. ORDER Petitioners, who are accused Nos.1, 3 and 4 in Crime No.915 of 2010 of Koyilandy Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 366(A) and 376 r/w Section 34 IPC seek their enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 24.10.2010. The petitioners were arrested on 31.10.2010. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application contending inter alia that a 17 year old plus two student was taken to Kanhangad by A1 masquerading as her lover and ravished her and A3 and A4 facilitated the commission of offence by A1. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners, the relative conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioners, the sentiments of the near relatives of the victim and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioners are released on bail, they will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution B.A. No. of 2010 2 witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioners making themselves scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) rv