IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20421 of 2009 1. KOMAL DEVI, wife of late Kripa Shankar Jha 2. Buchiya Devi, wife of Anil Jha Both are residents of vill.-Wari, P.S.-Singhia, Distt.-Samastipur----------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 3. 17.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Investigating Officer can be blamed in the case not to examine the witnesses who have any concern with the deceased father’s family informant has clearly made allegation of demand and torture resulting into killing of the deceased. But on the other hand, husband is not made accused in the case. It is said that he was residing in Bombay and deceased was residing to her native village. Husband’s villagers are examined in the case and they have stated that a single point was opposed by the deceased that once Rs.5,000/- was given by the deceased’s husband to his brother, namely, Sudhir Kumar Jha, and agitating therefrom the deceased set herself on fire. Finding no corroboration informant’s version along with husband not being made accused in the case, petitioner is allowed anticipatory bail. In the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rosera, 2 Samastipur, in connection with Singhia P.S. case no.33 of 2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. However, in case concerned witnesses if are examined making some reliable accusation against these petitioners who happen to be mother-in-law and gotni of the deceased, their bail so granted in the case shall be reconsidered at the stage of framing of charge. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh,J )