IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 LA.App..No. 597 of 2007() ------------------------- LAR.19/2002 of ADL.SUB COURT, THALASSERY .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------ STATE OF KERALA BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SHYSON P.MANGUZHA RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANTS ------------------------ 1. ALINKEEL KALLIANI, W/O.KUNHAMBU KALLIASSERY AMSOM, IRINAVE DESOM P.O.IRINAVE, KANNUR DISTRICT 2. THARAMMEL KARUNAKARAN S/O.KUNHAMBU, KALLIASSERY AMSOM, IRINAVE DESOM, P.O., IORINAVE, KANNUR DISTRICT 3. PULLUVAN VALAPPIL NANDINI D/O. KUNHAMBU, KALLIASSERY AMSOM IRINAVE DESOM.P.O., IRINAVE KANNUR DISTRICT 4. PULLUVAN VALAPPIL MADHAVI D/O.KUNHAMBU, KALLIASSERY AMSOM, IRINAVE DESOM.P.O., IRINAVE, KANNUR DISTRICT 5. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KINFRA THIRUVANANTHAPURAM ADV. SMT.K.K.CHANDRALEKHA FOR R1-4 SRI.SUDHEESH THAROL FOR R1-4 SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH FOR R5 THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` L.A.A. No. 597 of 2007 ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 25th day of November, 2009 J U D G M E N T Pius C. Kuriakose, J. This appeal by the government pertains to acquisition of land in Kalliassery village for the purpose of setting up Kannur Power Project. The reference court under the impugned judgment did not grant any enhancement for the government land. Having gone through the impugned judgment, we are of the view that the approach of the learned Sub Judge was reasonable. Exts.A1 and A2 documents were rightly not relied on. But, it was found that the rate granted by the Land Acquisition Officer is too meagre. We feel that it is more or less the correct market value of the acquired property at the relevant time, which was fixed by the reference court under the impugned judgment. Hence, there is no warrant for interference. The appeal will stand dismissed. No costs. (PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE) (K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE) aks