IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Modification Application No.985 of 2010 In Writ Petition No.1443 of 2010 (M/S) Sardar Ali ……Petitioner Versus Uttarakhand Cooperative Sugar Federation Ltd. & Ors. …….Respondents Dated: November 24, 2010 Mohd. Umar, Advocate for the petitioner/applicant. Mr. I.D. Paliwal, Advocate holding brief of Mr. R.K. Raizada, Advocate for respondent nos.1 and 2 Mr. K.C. Tiwari, Brief Holder for respondent no.3 Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties on the modification application. By way of modification application (MCC No.985 of 2010), the petitioner has prayed to modify the order dated 17.8.2010, directing the respondent no.2 to decide the representation dated 28.8.2010 and 22.9.2010 within a stipulated time frame. Vide order dated 17.8.2010 passed by this Court, the petitioner was given liberty to make a representation before the respondents and on the same the respondents were directed to pass a speaking and reasoned order expeditiously. The grievance of the petitioner is that by the order dated 17.8.2010 no time frame was fixed for the respondents to decide the representations of the petitioner. Therefore, he prayed that the respondent no.2 may be directed to take decision on his representations within a stipulated time. In view of the fact that the representations dated 28.8.2010 and 22.9.2010 made by the petitioner have been received by the authority concerned, it is hereby directed that the respondent no.2 shall decide the representations of the petitioner, by a speaking and reasoned order, expeditiously preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order before him. 2 Order dated 17.8.2010 stands modified to the aforesaid extent. Modification Application (MCC No.985 of 2010) stands disposed of. (B.S.Verma, J.) 24.11.2010 RG