:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 283 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 283 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 283 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Dhannu L. Patil & Anr. ..Respondents ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 102 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 102 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 102 OF 1992 Ganu N. Gavada ..Appellant versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 164 OF 199 FIRST APPEAL NO. 164 OF 199 FIRST APPEAL NO. 164 OF 1991 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Ganu N. Patil & Ors. ..Respondents ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 284 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 284 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 284 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Krishna G. Patil & Ors. ..Respondents :2: ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 291 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 291 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 291 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Dattatraya S. Tupare ..Respondent ALONG ALONG ALONG WITH WITH WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 302 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 302 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 302 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Laxman R. Patil ..Respondent ALONG ALONG ALONG WITH WITH WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 308 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 308 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 308 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Purshottam D. Gurav ..Respondent ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 323 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 323 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 323 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Narayan L. Patil ..Respondent :3: ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 331 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 331 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 331 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Pandurang M. Nagvekar ..Respondent ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 444 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 444 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 444 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Laxman B. Kalji ..Respondent ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.908 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO.908 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO.908 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Golmanna K. Mohite ..Respondent ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 913 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 913 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 913 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus :4: Chudapa K. Jadhav & Anr. ..Respondents ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1009 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1009 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1009 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Ravaloo B. Chirmukar ..Respondent ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1098 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1098 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1098 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Ramling L. Hulaji ..Respondent ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 287 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 287 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 287 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus B.G. Patil (D.H) 1A) Laxmi Babu Rao Patil & Ors. ..Respondents ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 152 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 152 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 152 OF 1992 :5: The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Ramu Shetupa Patil ..Respondent ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 154 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 154 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 154 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Bharmanna B. Zanjari & ors. ..Respondents ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 157 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 157 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 157 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Pandurang B. Parwadkar ..Respondent ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 285 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 285 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 285 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Appu Bhairu Patil ..Respondent ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 288 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 288 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 288 OF 1992 :6: The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Janki Kero Gurav & Ors. ..Respondents ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 290 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 290 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 290 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Ramlinga T. Patil ..Respondent ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 296 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 296 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 296 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Dhondiba G. Patil & Ors. ..Respondents ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 298 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 298 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 298 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Devappa P. Patil ..Respondent ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 299 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 299 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 299 OF 1992 :7: The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Laxman R.Gurao ..Respondent ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. FIRST APPEAL NO. FIRST APPEAL NO. 301 OF 1992 301 OF 1992 301 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Ravalu T. Patil & Ors. ..Respondents ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. FIRST APPEAL NO. FIRST APPEAL NO. 303 OF 1992 303 OF 1992 303 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Guruvappa S. Gurav ..Respondent ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO . 304 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO . 304 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO . 304 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus A. P. Mundargi ..Respondent ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH :8: FIRST APPEAL NO. FIRST APPEAL NO. FIRST APPEAL NO. 305 OF 1992 305 OF 1992 305 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus versus versus Krishna J. Mohite ..Respondent ..Respondent ..Respondent ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. FIRST APPEAL NO. FIRST APPEAL NO. 309 OF 1992 309 OF 1992 309 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Kalu Y. Shinde & Anr. ..Respondents ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO FIRST APPEAL NO FIRST APPEAL NO. 310 OF 1992 310 OF 1992 310 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus L. K. Patil (D.H.) Smt. L.L. Patil & Ors. ..Respondents ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. FIRST APPEAL NO. FIRST APPEAL NO. 312 OF 1992 312 OF 1992 312 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus I.G. Patil (D.H) Smt. G.I. :9: Patil & Ors. ..Respondents ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 313 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 313 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 313 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus S.D. Patil (D.H) Smt. G.S. Patil & Ors. ..Respondents ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 314 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 314 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 314 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Venku S. Patil ..Respondent ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 315 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 315 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 315 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus G. N. Chougule ..Respondent ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 316 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 316 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 316 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Kachru R. Gurav ..Respondent :10: ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 317 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 317 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 317 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus. Gurunath G. Patil & Ors. ..Respondents ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 319 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 319 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 319 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus. Maruti R. Gurav & Anr. ..Respondents ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 322 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 322 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 322 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versuss. Vishav A. Patil & Anr. ..Respondents ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 324 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 324 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 324 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus. :11: Vithal C. Gurav ..Respondent ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 325 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 325 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 325 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus. Shardabai S. Bhusari ..Respondent ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 326 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 326 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 326 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus. 1A. Smt. Sitabai B. Kamble & Ors. ..Respondents ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 328 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 328 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 328 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Maoruti R. Patil & Ors. ..Respondents ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 329 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 329 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 329 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants :12: versus. Krishna M. Malkar ..Respondent ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 330 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 330 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 330 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Suresh M. Sabrad ..Respondent ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 426 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 426 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 426 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Dattu R. Patil ..Respondent ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 911 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 911 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 911 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Punappa B. Gavada ..Respondent ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 912 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 912 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 912 OF 1992 :13: The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Bhoju M. Gurao ..Respondent ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1000 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1000 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1000 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Ningappa K. Patil ..Respondent ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1010 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1010 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1010 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Appellants versus Gavadu B. Patil & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. K. K. Tated, AGP for the State in First Appeal Nos. 283/92, 102/91, 164/91, 284, 291, 302, 308, 323 and, 331 all of 1992. Mr. B. R. Patil, Acting G.P. for the State in First Appeal Nos. 444, 908, 913, 1009 and 1098 of 1992. Mr. S. N. Gawade, AGP for the State in First Appeal No. 287, 152, 154, 157 and 285 all of 1992. :14: Smt. G. P. Mulekar, AGP for the State in First Appeal Nos. 288, 290, 296, 298 and 299 all of 1992. Mr. Y. M. Nakhwa, AGP for the State in First Appeal Nos. 301, 303, 304, 305 and 309 all of 1992. Smt. P. H. Kantharia, AGP for the State in First Appeal Nos. 310, 312, 313, 314 and 315 all of 1992. Smt. U. V. Kejariwal, AGP for the State in First Appeal Nos. 316, 317, 319, 322 and 324 all of 1992. Mr. D. S. Mhaispurkar, AGP for the State in First Appeal Nos. 325, 326, 328, 329 and 330 all of 1992. Mr. B. H. Mehta, AGP for the State in First Appeal Nos. 426, 911, 912, 1000 and 1010 all of 1992. Mr. Suresh Sabrad with S. M. Kamble for the Claimants. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. DATE : 24TH MARCH, 2005 DATE : 24TH MARCH, 2005 DATE : 24TH MARCH, 2005 ORAL ORDER : ORAL ORDER : ORAL ORDER : 1. All these Appeals arise out of a common order passed in Reference Cases by the Reference Court under the Land Acquisition Act. 2. According to the AGPs for the State all the :15: above appeals can be disposed of because they arise out of a common judgment. One of such appeals arising from the same judgment has been decided by this court viz. First Appeal No. 289 of 1992 by Justice Kakade on 8th December 2003. By that judgment the appeal of the State was dismissed. The learned AGPs therefore states that since these Appeals are also arising out of the same judgment, proper order should be passed. Accordingly, these Appeals are dismissed along with Civil applications, if any, in the respective Appeals. No order as to costs. 24.03.2005 (D.G. DESHPANDE, J.)