IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5765 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.708 OF 2004 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.180 OF 2004 Mumtaz Khan Hamid Khan ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... Ms.S.Singh for Applicant. Mr.Rajesh More, A.P.P. for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DECEMBER 16, 2005. DECEMBER 16, 2005. DECEMBER 16, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The appropriate course would be : 2 : to ascertain that the fresh surety that is offered is solvent, only then the earlier surety would stand discharged. Ordered accordingly. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.