r> C^- )€^i 7- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARHl WRIT PETITION (HABEAS CORPUSt N0. o5'A /2011 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226, CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. PETITIONER Deepak Kumar Sahu, S/o Sanat Kumar Sahu, Aged 22 years, R/o Village Murta, Tahsil Nawagar, Thana Nawagarh, District Durg (CG.) VERSUS ^y\ / ^^^^IT^ ^ <Q^?^?' ' I; ^^L--^' .-^ RESPONDENTS ^••^ \^^/ -y^yy ^•^'^< \ .^%^ ^;^ ^' ^^ ^ / 2. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Home, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG.) The Superintendent of Police, District Bilaspur (CG.) 3. The Station House Officer, Police Station Mungeli, District Bilaspur (CG.) 4. Shri Awadesh Patel, S/o not known, Aged about 45 years, 5. Smt. Renu Patel, W/o Shri Awadesh Patel, Aged about 40 years, 6. Ku. Anubha Patel, D/o Shri Awadesh Patel, Aged about 21 years, Respondents no. 4 to 5 all R/o Village Devari, Post Devari, P.S. Mungeli, Tahsil Mungeli District Bilaspur (CG.) ^^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Division Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri & Hon'ble Shri Radhe Shyam Sharma, JJ. WRIT PETITION (HC) N0.2521 QE20A1 PETITIONER Deepak Kumar Sahu Versus . State of Chhattisgarh & Othes RESPONDENTS (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Present:- Shri Sanjay S. Agrawal, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Govt. Advocate forthe State. Shri M.K. Bhaduri, Advocate for the respondents No.4 to 6. Petitioner, Respondents No.4 to 6 are also present. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on ttiis 10th day of May, 2011) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This petition is filed by Deepak Kumar Sahu, who daims to be a friend of the respondent No.6 - Ku. Anubha Patel, seeking a writ of habeas corpus to permit the respondent No.6 to stay with him, as the respondents No.4 & 5 i.e. the parents of the respondent No.6 are restraining herfrom meeting with the petitioner. 3. The respondent No.6 - Ku. Anubha Patel, present in the Court, submits that there is no restriction or restrain on her from her parents namely; Awadesh Patel (respondent No.4) & Smt. Renu Patel (respondent No.5). She is at liberty to move any where and she wants to live with her parents only. 4. In view of foregoing, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication and, as such, petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus, is liable to be-and is hereby dismissed. Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Sd/- R.S. Sharma Judge 1