IN THE HIGH COBRT OP JODIC&TURE &T BILIiSEUR(CHH§tTTISGaRH) W8IT PSTITION N0. 2JS OPZOOa Mukesh Khatlk.aget3 aboufc 30,years, aoa of late Ramabahadur Khatik, B.T.I.; Roa<3, Katia.aamuaS, (C.G. ) aktoeay ^or' . »iriri$lal son COKSTITOT'ION ®E> II»:I& ears reslde Tehsil C.G.) . .^State of Ghhattlsgarh, tbroagh Secretary.p'ULblic Works Bepartment/ Mantral aya, B.K.S.Shawan, Ra.lpur , (C.G.) -.' Exeegtlve Bnglneer ,P.'».B. (B . & R ) Divlsion' No .3, Glyil Llnes. Ra.i.pur, (C.G.} WRITB^^^M .'B'aaSR ARTICLES'226/22 I~,£ particulars o£ the peti'tj.Qner ; &s per cause title. partieulars of ttie Respondents s ^^'^^y ^: ^^" .^^".^' ^l^^ •^^^ ^. •f?^ per eause title;. 9 .<- ^ o' particalars ®f-theorder agalnst which ttie pet.itlon. is:made's • . Order No.34/82/Rentdatecl 9.12.2062, of the ResponiSent no.2, unfier whieh two more T®IiTax rekas i'iaatj have .beeB establlgt'ieia on the -saae road ph whlch the petlt.loner' .l.e worklng. This order 1S ap^enfled as Snnexareip-1^:- •'::::.• ! l'- \ »'.0•* •0.** •! • • •«..*• 1 V. .^.^\ _.^-.«a<mawil :,,: ,,,.,A,.,»,i Rt XI-HC-22 'sst '^W^,-Q'SW , fiiai-yy .\£i. IWCTI grinqi M 200 Rl'btitl" CT^I^iT (<•)).<* Sf^t 'fft*v -^Iifl •*ti^<i s«iiw^1i^i 16.01A004 Shri Prashant Mishia, Shri Rajesh ttendey, Govt Heard. cotua^elftM' AAv. Rctum has been fited onbetlalfoffheState. Leamed State counsel subnlite that (he in view of ffae Ctoitse No.25 of the auctton conditfoas (A^i have appioachcd fhe Department, Ralpur Divlsion fi>r In view ofthe above, leamefl / (hc Supcrintcndcnt Bxiginccr, Diyision. Hawing conaidered fhe Sact^ and wifhout expxessing any opiiuoja opnuon oftfae Court cnds ofjusycje pemutted to subadt fhe Superiatendent Kaynecr and if| conccmed Superintendent Eti.gia<tcr z <i>Ni<?t<ilT] 7W^S ^ ;fel<^ ^f^trgK ^sipgiisn^i the petitioner. fer the State. (A^mexure R-^ ttw petittoner should Superm.tEJndeat EngmeeT, PubBc Works rejdressalofliis grievance. counscl for ttie petitfoncr wants to wifhdraw tfais writ pctitmn witl^ libcrty to subinit dispute bcfoic Pi^blic Works Dcpartmcut, Raipur dfspute and circunistances of fhe casc on liie naerits offhe case, ia flie wiB be senred if the petitioner is bcfore fhe <»aceamed such a (topute te taiaed fhe shaB deiade thc sainc on its [•1q®^i^ '^^•^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^'^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^f^^^'f^^S^^ XI-HC-22 "S^l •^WWi, »Ml*i<re, Kiani«^< ^i^r xra^ v<iwn ttiii'* "^ 200 aii^iw Vt-U* S!^S stilili^lfTO Y^^ ^ <A- own inerits in accordaiice with lan^ after faearin^ fhc petitkuter. If |remains he n»ayawail renaedy as the grievance ofthe petitioner stfll| perlaw. With the dlrec'tion aforcsaid, G>nsequentty, *M.W.P. Nos. Nos. 1808/03, 2579/2003, 3095/2{)03 Certified copyas per Rutes. piis petitioa stands disposed of. [34/2003 & 998/2003 and I.A. also stand dtoposedof. 'hWlddl'l 4Wd"Tfl" st<l9]<(l< i? <wRdi< 3)i^i sd/- [T]»^W yf