- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.86 OF 2005 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL ST. NO.7574 OF 2005 Mrs.Sujata Sandeep Palekar ..Applicant Vs. Mr.Sandeep Yashwant Palekar ..Respondent ... Mr.Shrishail Sakhare for Applicant None for Respondent. ... CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 29,2005 DATE : NOVEMBER 29,2005 DATE : NOVEMBER 29,2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant. No one is present for Respondent though affidavit in reply has been filed. 2. By this Civil Application, the Applicant is seeking condonation of 57 days’ delay in filing the above Appeal. In para No.3 of the Application, the Applicant has categorically stated that she was suffering from ‘Infective Hepatitis’ and she was advised to take complete bed rest. Over and above, the Applicant had to make arrangements for money to file the above Appeal. In these circumstances, the delay has occurred. Having regard to the facts and - 2 - circumstances of this case, sufficient cause has been made out for condonation of delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide. Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 2. Place the above Appeal on board for admission on 12.12.2005. [DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]