0704cwp225.11.odt 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.225 OF 2011. Roshan s/o Ashok Thakre ..vs.. State of Mah. and ors. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders. or directions and Registrar's orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Sudhir Malode, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr. D.B.Yengal, APP for the State. CORAM : MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND M.L.TAHALIYANI, JJ. DATED : 7th APRIL, 2011. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner is an accused in C.R.No. 10 of 2011 of Police Station, Kondhali. The said case is under Section 363, 366 of I.P.Code. The petitioner has preferred an application for bail before the concerned sessions court. The grievance of the petitioner is that the said bail application is not being registered, as the bail conditions set out in the Notification No.P 0805/2010 have not been complied. The said Notification amends Criminal Manual, 1980 in relation to consideration of bail application and surety. 0704cwp225.11.odt 2/2 3. The said Notification provides that the accused shall submit copies of at least two documents amongst the nine documents mentioned in the Notification. One of them is Ration Card. The petitioner has produced Ration Card. No doubt the Ration Card is in the name of father of the petitioner, but the name of the petitioner figures therein. Thus this document falls within the nine documents mentioned in the Notification. The petitioner has also produced Certificate from Gram-Panchayat, Kondhali which shows that he is resident of the said village. We are of the view that ultimately the purpose of asking any accused to produce at least two of the nine documents stated in the rules is to get an assurance that the applicant has a permanent place of residence and that he will be available during the course of trial, if released on bail. In our view, the production of above two documents by the petitioner will serve the purpose of the amendment. In view of these two documents which have been produced, the bail application preferred by the petitioner be registered and same be considered on its own merits. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. JUDGE JUDGE chute