1 S.B.Cr.Misc. II Bail App. No. 4781/2007 (Raju Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 22/10/2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. G.R.Punia for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor. Mr. Mahendra Choudhary for the complainant. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by counsel for the complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the complainant submit that the parties are resident of same village living in neighbourhood and have amicably settled the dispute and therefore, the complainant does not oppose grant of bail to the petitioner. Since the parties have compromised the matter and no evidence is likely to come against the petitioner, looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Raju Ram S/o Shri Amra Ram be released on bail in FIR No. 182/07 P.S. Makrana, district Nagaur provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the 2 satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP