IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7216 of 2009 1. RAMU BALAM SINGH, SON OF SURYA BALI SINGH, R/V + P.O. ARAK, P.S. KRISHNABRAHM, DISTRICT BUXAR. 2. JITENDRA KUMAR SINGH, SON OF SRI SADHU CHARAN SINGH, R/V ARAK, P.S. KRISHNA BRAHM, DISTRICT BUXAR -----PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE HOME COMMISSIONER, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE D.G. CUM I.G. OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE D.I.G. TIRHUT RANGE, MUZAFFARPUR. 5. THE S.P., MUZAFFARPUR------RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02. 01.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners were the applicants pursuant to Advertisement No. 01/2004, Annexure-1. It is submitted on their behalf that they had appeared in the selection process undertaken pursuant to the said advertisement and their performance in the selection test was satisfactory yet they have not been called for appointment/verification of their certificates. 3. Let the petitioners represent before the Chairman of the Selection Board before whom they had appeared to undergo the selection process. With the representation petitioners should also enclose their admit cards. Once the representation if filed the Chairman of the Selection Board should consider the same in accordance with law and dispose of by passing a reasoned order giving reasons as to why petitioners were not called for appointment/verification of their testimonials as early as possible, in any case within one month from the date of receipt of the representation. 4. This writ application is accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)