$-4 " IN THE HIGH COURT + CRL.M.C. 1809 l20II ANIL KUMAR & ORS OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ..... Petitioners Dinesh Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. ..... Respondent B. R. Sharma, Adv. for R-2 SHALI ORDER L2.O7.20LL This is a petition filed by the four petitioners for quashing of FIR No. 17 12009 under Section 498A/406134 IPC registered by crime against Women Cell, Nanak Pura, New Delhi on the basis of a complaint lodged by the respondentno.2. The petitioners prayed for quashing of the aforesaid FIR and the consequent charge sheet filed before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Dwarka Courts, Delhi. The ground for quashing of the FIR and the consequent proceedings is that the petitioner no.l/husband has settled all his matrimonial disputes with the respondent no. 2/wLfe and they have also been divorced by the compeient Court on 06.07.2011. It has been further stated that the settlement amount of 72,25,000/- was to be paid to the responderrt no.2, out of which an amount of {1,00,000/- has Through: Mr. versus STATE & ANR Through: Mr. > - % 1. 2. rl Signing Date:31.08.2024 17:26:12 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified .J already been paid at the time of divorce. The balance amount of {1,25,000/- is to be given today in the Court by way of a bank draft in favour of Nirupama Gautam bearing no. 211555 drawn on canara Bank dated o2.o5.2o11 to the respondent no.2. A11 the petitioners except the petitioner no. 3 are duly identified by the learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioner no.3's application is on record, but it has been stated that by the learned counsel for the petitioners that on account of illness she was not in a position to come to the Court. The respondent nLo. 2 is present in Court with her counsel and is duly identified by her counsel. The affidavit of respondent no. 2 i" o.t record and she has also supported the case set up by the petitioners in the petition. She has also been questioned orally in Court and has stated that she has no objection in case the FIR and the consequent proceedings are quashed on the ground that she has been divorced by the competent Court and the fact that she has also received the entire payment of.< 2,25,000/-. Having , regard to the facts of the case that the matrimonial disputes between the parties have been settled and they have also been divorced. No useful purpose would be served by continuing the matrimonial proceedings against the petitioners in respect of the FIR and the consequent proceedings. Accordingly, the FIR No. 17 l2oog under Section 498A1406134 IPC registered by crime 3. a.t 4. against Women Cell, Nanak Pura, New Delhi and the consequent charge sheet which is pending in the competent Court is quashed. nt lltr.,,.-^ lv' v.K. sHALr,J JULY \2,2OLL KP (;