IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 25TH AUGUST 2008 / 3RD BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 25584 of 2008(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- SREE RAM CITY UNION FINANCE LTD, AMEW-33/12, IST FLOOR, THIRUVAMBADY JUNCTION, ALAPPUZHA, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, PRAVEEN P.S. BY ADV. SRI.C.HARIKUMAR SRI.ARAVINDA KUMAR BABU T.K. RESPONDENTS: ------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, ALAPPUZHA. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ALAPPUZHA. BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 25584 OF 2008 U = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 25th day of August 2008 J U D G M E N T The registered owner of the vehicle KL5/L-5069 had approached this Court by filing W.P.(C) No. 21818/08 complaining that his application for renewal of permit is not being considered for want of declaration from the financier. That writ petition was disposed of by Ext. P3 judgment directing that it will be open to the registered owner to approach the 2nd respondent, with a proper declaration, for renewal of permit. It was further directed that in case declaration is filed, the application for renewal will be considered. 2. Petitioner herein is the financier of the vehicle referred to above and it is stated that though he filed Ext. P1 objection to the renewal of the permit, the 2nd respondent is declining to consider the objection for the reason that a direction to that effect is not passed in Ext. P3 judgment. W.P.(C) No. 25584 OF 2008 -2- 3. If as stated by the petitioner, it is only on account of the reason that there is no such direction in Ext. P3 that his objection is not considered, it is clarified that in case a proper and valid objection has been received from the petitioner, the same shall also be taken up when the application for renewal is taken up for consideration. 3. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-