IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28661 of 2010 PREM CHANDRA VERMA son of Late Sona Ram Verma, resident of village-Bari Tola, Buxar, P.S.- Buxar, Town & Dist.-Buxar. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 4.2.2011 Heard Mr.Gajanan Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. R.C.Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and Mr. Binod Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner, who is in custody in connection with Buxar (T) P.S. Case NO.347 of 2009 registered for the offences under section 307 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act and subsequently section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added, has prayed for grant of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner, while pressing the bail petition, submits that though in the first information report the informant had disclosed that the petitioner and one another co- accused had fired which resulted in injuring the informant and one rickshaw puller and had also disclosed the name of other accused persons but during investigation the case of the petitioner was falsified due the reasons that one of the co-accused was given benefit of alibi and final report was submitted in his favour. It was further submitted that during investigation one Hanuman Prasad was arrested in this case and he made disclosure which proves the case as false which creates serious doubt. Learned counsel for the informant as well as learned 2 Additional Public Prosecutor for the State have argued that the informant, while giving his fardbeyan during treatment, himself had named the petitioner and, as such, the petitioner does not deserve bail and prayed to reject the prayer for bail. After going through the first information report, the court is of the opinion that it is not a fit case for grant of bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail stands rejected. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)