IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.34561-M of 2009 Date of Decision:4.3.2011 Paramjit Singh and others .... Petitioners Versus Narinder Kaur .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Ms. Kuldeep Kaur Ghuman, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. G.N. Malik, Advocate for the respondent. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of the complaint filed under Section 498-A, 506 IPC and as a consequence thereof summoning order dated 3.1.2003 vide which the petitioners have been summoned under Section 406/498-A IPC. Learned counsel for the respondent states that the charges have been framed against the petitioners and the petitioners have filed revision against the order dated 11.10.2010 passed by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Malerkotla, framing charges. The said revision petition is still pending. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to raise all the pleas in the aforesaid revision petition against the order dated 11.10.2010 framing of charge. 4.3.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE