IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 2796 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 29.4.2010 ... Mukhtar Singh and another ................Petitioners vs. Punjab and Sind Bank and another .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. H.S. Batth, Advocate for the petitioners ... K.C. Puri, J. (Oral) This is a revision petition against order dated 6.3.2010 (Annexure P-4), passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Tarn Taran, vide which the oral objection preferred by the petitioners in respect of notice under Order 21 Rule 66 CPC, was declined. Briefly stated, the Punjab and Sind Bank filed a suit for recovery of the amount and that suit was decreed. The property was mortgaged in favour of the bank and that was being sold in the execution proceedings. Regarding that notice under Order 21 Rule 66 CPC has been issued. The petitioner has no locus standi to object to the same in respect of sale of mortgaged property. So, in these circumstances, the revision petition is without any merit and the same stands dismissed. ( K.C. Puri ) 29.4.2010 Judge chugh