IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 26TH FEBRUARY 2007 / 7TH PHALGUNA 1928 WP(C).No. 6260 of 2007(T) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- K.R.SAHADEVAN, PUTHENVELIYIL, K.R.PURAM P.O., CHERTHALA. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN. RESPONDENT: ---------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ALAPPUZHA. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. N. SUDHADEVI. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/02/2007,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, J. ---------------------------- WP(C).No.6260 of 2007-T ------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of February, 2007. JUDGMENT The petitioner is operating the Stage Carriage KL-4/R 7468 on the route Cherthala-Vyttila, on the strength of a regular permit. The time schedule of the said vehicle was settled on 26-6-2006. Feeling aggrieved by the said time schedule, the petitioner filed a representation on 11-8-2006 ie. within six weeks of the finalisation of the time schedule for variation of the said time schedule. Thereafter this writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P1. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the time schedule finalised on 26-6-2006, the remedy of the petitioner was to challenge it in revision before the State Transport Appellate Tribunal. A representation filed thereafter is not maintainable. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. But, this will not affect the rights of the petitioner to file any fresh application for variation of his time schedule, based on the change of circumstances, in future. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, MS JUDGE.