1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.5036 OF 2009 Vilasrao s/o Kisanrao Pawar and ors. .. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents Shri R.V.Gore, Advocate for petitioners Shri V.H.Dighe, AGP for respondent Nos.1 and 3 Shri U.B.Bondar, Advocate for respondents 2, 4 and 5 CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND A.V. POTDAR, JJ. DATE : 9th September 2009 PER COURT : 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by which the petitioners pray for directing respondent No.2 to appoint a responsible Officer who is not related to the Hariyali Panlot Vikas Karyakarma Mauje Kankori, Taluka Gangapur, District Aurangabad for enquiry in respect of the representation dated 3.6.2009. 2. On notice of this petition being issued to the respondents, respondents have filed their affidavit-in-reply. At paragraph 2 and 3 of the affidavit-in-reply, it is stated that the District Superintending Agriculture Officer, Aurangabad has been appointed as an Enquiry Officer and has been directed to submit his report. At paragraph 3 it is stated that the enquiry would be 2 completed as expeditiously as possible but it would take at least three months to complete the said enquiry and submit the report. 3. In the light of the affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of respondents 2 and 4, the reliefs which the petitioners have prayed for stand fully granted and no interference is called for in this petition. Consequently, this petition is dismissed as the reliefs have been rendered infructuous on account of the affidavit-in-reply with no orders as to costs. ( A.V.POTDAR, J.) ( P.V.HARDAS, J.) vvr/5036.09wp