CR No.2852 of 2009 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CR No.2852 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision:-17.9.2009 Gurbachan Singh ...Petitioner Versus Gurdwara Committee Mahal ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Sarbjit Singh Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for the respondent. A.N.Jindal, J. (Oral): The trial Court in its order dated 9.5.2009 has mentioned that the defendant took the following plea in his written statement:- “It is denied that the respondent took on rent the shop in question at the monthly rent of Rs.750/-. It is also denied that any rent note was ever executed by the respondent in favour of the applicant. It is specifically denied that there exists any relationship of landlord and tenant between the applicant and the respondent. The rent note is false, frivolous and fabricated documents procured by the applicant.” In the succeeding para, the trial Court observed that since the defendant has already set up the pleas as sought by it by way of amendment, therefore, the proposed amendment cannot be allowed. Faced with the situation, learned counsel for the petitioner CR No.2852 of 2009 (O&M) 2 has submitted that though these pleas are there, yet no issue has been framed with regard to the same, therefore, the necessity of filing of this application, arose. In these circumstances, this petition is dismissed with a direction to the trial court to examine if all the issues arising out of the pleadings of the parties have been framed by it and if not, the required issues be framed. (A.N.Jindal) 17.9.2009 Judge AS