IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.70 of 2009 1. Sadai Ram 2. Ram Prasad Ram Both are sons of Late Sheogobind Ram and residents of village and P.O. Mohnagani, Unchal via Majhaulia, P.S.- Bettiah (M ), District- West Champaran ……….. Plaintiffs/petitioners Versus 1. Ramdeo Ram, S/o Late Sukhal Ram 2. Sahdeo Ram, S/o Late Sukhal Ram 3. Rambisar Ram, S/o Late Sukhdeo Ram 4. Pramod Ram, S/o Late Sukhdeo Ram All are resident of village and P.O. Mahnagani, Via- Majhaulia, P.S.- Bettiah (M), Unchal and Via Majhaulia, District- West Champaran ………. Defendants Ist Set/Opposite Parties 5. Jagdeo Ram, S/o Late Bachcha Ram. 6. Jasiya Devi, D/o Late Jitan Ram wife of Sheo Ram, Both are resident of village and P.O. Mahnagani, Unchal and Via- Majhaulia, P.S.- Bettiah (M), District- West Champaran ……….. Defendants 2nd Set/Opposite Parties. For the Petitioners:- Mr. Akhileshwar Kr. Srivastava, Advocate ----------- 02 20.01.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Petitioners are the plaintiffs and have challenged the order dated 18.11.2008 passed in Title Suit No. 13 of 1995. Suit has been filed for declaration of title and recovery of possession. It is submitted that by the impugned order the trial court has appointed Advocate Commissioner for scientific measurement of the disputed land. According to the petitioners the order was totally uncalled for as there was no requirement for such scientific measurement since the land in dispute has got separate identity and identification. - 2 - However, the trial court after consideration of rival submissions has come to the conclusion that the scientific measurement of the disputed land is necessary for the decision of the suit and has ordered for appointing Advocate Commissioner for the aforesaid purpose. I do not find any illegality or material irregularity in the order impugned warranting interference by this Court in its revisional jurisdiction. As a result this Civil Revision is dismissed. P.K. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)