IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 13TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 22ND KARTHIKA 1929 WP(C).No. 33307 of 2007(M) PETITIONER: --------------- 1. T.G. RAO, S/O.T.R. GOKUL DAS, THAKADIYEL HOUSE, PONKUNNAM P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. T.G. KALESH KUMAR S/O.T.R.GOKUL DAS, THAKADIYEL HOUSE, PONKUNNAM P.O. KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.VIJU ABRAHAM SRI.JOY C. PAUL SRI.DOMINIC JOHNSON RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM. 2. THAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KANJIRAPALLY. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SRI.I.V. PAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 33307 OF 2007 M = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 13th November, 2007 J U D G M E N T Ext. P3 is an application made by the petitioner to the 2nd respondent for effecting mutation of the properties mentioned therein. It is submitted that the reason for the inaction on Ext. P3 is the allegation that the land in question is puramboke. Petitioner submits that by virtue of Exts. P4 and P5 judgments rendered by the Civil Courts, this aspect of the matter is already covered in their favour. Petitioners also make reference to Ext. P6 judgment of this Court where in similar circumstances mutation was directed to be effected and that in compliance thereof by Ext. P7 order, mutation has in fact been carried out. In the light of this, petitioner seeks a direction requiring the 2nd respondent to consider Ext. P3 in the light of Exts. P4 and P7. 2. In view of the facts as stated above, I am of the opinion that the request of the petitioner is fully WPC No.33307/07 -2- justified. Accordingly I dispose of this writ petition directing the 2nd respondent to take up for consideration Ext. P3 application made by the petitioner in the light of Exts. P4, P5 and P7. Orders on Ext. P3 shall be passed as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-