IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2614 of 2007 HARI KISHUN CHAMAR @ SRI KISHUN DAS…. Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Joint Director Consolidation, Gaya 3. The Anchal Adhikari Amas Gaya 4. Ram Das Chamar 5. Ram Prasad Chamar 6. Ram Pati Chamar 7. Shiva Pati Chamar ……… Respondents ----------- 02- 15.1.2009 Heard Mr. Murari Kumar Sinha for the petitioner, Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, learned JC to AAG II, and Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad Sinha for respondent nos. 4 to 7. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 2.8.2005 (Annexure 1), passed by the learned Joint Director of Consolidation, Gaya, in Revision Case No.36/2000 (Ramdas Chamar & Ors. vs. Hari Kishun Chamar), whereby the revision application preferred by respondent nos. 4 to 7 herein was allowed. 2. While assailing the validity of the impugned order, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he had handed over all his papers to his counsel to be filed before the revisional authority but he did not do so resulting in grave prejudice to him. It appears to me on a perusal of the impugned order that the learned counsel for the present petitioner (respondent before the learned revisional authority) did appear and had made his submissions. The learned revisional authority has also noted that the learned counsel for the respondent before him had not filed documents in support of his submission. It thus appears that adequate opportunity was offered to the respondent before the revisional authority who did appear and was heard in the - 2 - matter. The principles of natural justice were, therefore, fully observed. 3. The writ petition is dismissed. ( S K Katriar ) mrl