1 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4898/2010. Amarnath Anand. VS Bhupendra Singh & Anr. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4898/2010. Amarnath Anand. VERSUS Bhupendra Singh and Another. 09.04.2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.Sharad Purohit, for the petitioner. ***** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order as well as the application seeking leave to amend the memo of appeal which has been filed as Annexure-1. I have also perused the issues which were framed by the learned trial court as have been incorporated at para Nos.9 and 10 of the writ petition. Issue No.3 has been framed with regard to the personal bonafide necessity; issue No.4 has been framed with regard to the comparative hardship; and issue No.5 has been framed by the learned trial court with regard to the partial eviction. These three issues are the relevant issues for the purposes of Section 13(1)(h) read with Section 14(2) (b) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950. Since once the parties have, being conscious of the issues involved and having gone to the trial and led evidence on the same, the defect, if any, 2 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4898/2010. Amarnath Anand. VS Bhupendra Singh & Anr. with regard to the pleadings, etc. looses its importance, as in the facts and circumstances of the present case. In the facts and circumstances, I find no jurisdictional error having being committed by the learned court below in passing the impugned order refusing amendment to the memo of appeal. The writ petition as well as the stay application stand dismissed summarily. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.