IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32866 of 2010 Pintu Kumar Mahto @ Pintu Kumar, son of Jawahar Mahto Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/- 03.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner, Pintu Kumar Mahto @ Pintu Kumar seeks his bail in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 100 of 209, registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Neither the petitioner is named in the First Information Report nor anything has been recovered from his conscious possession. It appears from perusal of the impugned order of learned Addl. Sessions Judge that the prayer for bail of this petitioner was rejected only on two grounds. Firstly, the photograph of the petitioner was identified by the informant’s mother as well as his father and secondly, the criminal antecedents of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submission of the parties, petitioner, namely, Pintu Kumar Mahto @ Pintu Kumar is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 100 of 2009. Ashwini/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)