1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.02.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM Crl.R.C.(MD).No.78 of 2011 Syndicate Bank represented by its Branch Manager, Ponmeni Branch, Maduri-625 016. ...Revision Petitioner/Complainant Vs. C.Appaswamy ... Respondent/Accused Prayer: Petition is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the dismissal for default order, dated 19.11.2010, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Madurai in S.T.C.No.unnumbered of 2010 For Petitioner : Mr.A.M.Pugazhenthi * * * * * ORDER A complaint of this petitioner, relating to Section 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, has been dismissed for the reason that no representation has been made on its behalf on 19.11.2010. 2. The lower Court had observed that the petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner was called absent continuously for more than three hearings. 3. Though, this Court finds that the order of the lower Court is not totally unjustified, this Court considers it proper to afford one more opportunity to the petitioner to prosecute its complaint. 4.Accordingly, the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Madurai is directed to restore the complaint in unnumbered petition to his file and proceed further in accordance with law. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(C.O) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 To The Judicial Magistrate No.V, Madurai. +One CC to Mr.A.M.P.Pugalendhi, Advocate, SR.No.4054 ssl rl/3c – 9.3.2011 Crl.R.C.(MD).No.78 of 2011 02.02.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/