IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 10772 of 2008 Between: Smt Varalamma, W/o.Ram Murthy, R/o.46-785-B-1A Swamy Reddy Nagar Kallur(M) Kurnool Dist ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Dist Collector Kurnool Dist Kurnool 2 The Tahsildar Kallur Mandal Kurnool Dist 3 The Project Director Dist Primary Education Programme Education Programme,Collerctorate Complex Kurnool Dist .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ,order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declaring the action of the respondents in proposing to demolish the premises bearing No 46/785-B- 1A admeasuring 14 sq.yards situated in Sy.No.781/A2 of Kalluru(V) and (M) Kurnool Dist without issuing any notice without initiating any land acquisition proceeding and without following the due process of Law as illegal arbitrary against the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to demolish the above said house premises without following the due process of law and to grant such other relief or reliefs Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.J.JANAKIRAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.10772 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: The petitioner states that the land admeasuring 14 square yards situated in Survey No.781/A2 of Kalluru Village and Mandal, Kurnool District, was assigned to him by the Mandal Revenue Officer by way of patta bearing Rc.B/1040/98 dated 26.01.1998 and that he constructed a small house on the land in question and that the respondents, without following the due process of law, are proposing to demolish the premises bearing H.No.46/785-B-1A in the land in question. Hence, the present writ petition is filed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. In the counter affidavit filed, it is stated that the second respondent- Tahsildar is not demolishing the hut of the petitioner and that the proposed construction of school site is adjacent to the site of the petitioner towards west-north corner and that the site of the petitioner has not been touched and only the site allotted to the School building have been measured and given peg marking for construction of the School building. Recording the said statement made in the counter affidavit filed, the writ petition is closed. ____________ N.V.RAMANA,J Date : 26.06.2008. VGSR