g nun. u'...u..n..nu u ( f if: Xl—HC—78 WW . ...9.i‘.k./.?£. mg 200 mmmwwr) WWW aurméwm m m m m WW W®ER %3Tf§m3n%¥r 30-8-2006 Mr. Vishnu Koshta, cour Mr. Satish Gupta, Depurty Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents. on advance copy. Heard both the counsel. By the instant’writ pet' !ndia, the petitioner has ch (Annexure P-2) passed by transferred from Primary School, Musurputta to Primary Schooi, P.V.97, Biock:Koyiibeda. e The said‘transfer has l Ciause 7 of the rationalizatii aggrieved person. Learned counsei for ti‘ aiready preferred an appeal appeal is not being decided b be directed to decide the app al to which learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents has no obje tion. unsel for the parties and having regard to the case, respondent No.2 is directed to decide in 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy ‘sel for the petitioner. ‘ion under Articie 226 of the Constitution of lenged his transfer order dated 29-7-2006 respondent No.3, whereby he has been ieen made under the rationalization scheme. an scheme provides for an appeal by the e petitioner submits that the petitioner has ore respondent No.2 on 4-8-2006 and that respondent No.2, therefore, respondent No.2 Having heard learned c facts and circumstances of th the appeal of the petitioner wit of this order, in accordance wit law. With the direction afores Consequently, M.(W.)P. id, the petition stands disposed of. 0.3551 [2006 also stands dis osed of. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge f