IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11182 of 2011 BHOLU @ MOIZ KHAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 19.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Admittedly, petitioner is not named in the first information report as accused and he has been shown as injured of the case but after investigation, the case took “U” turn and the son of the deceased claimed himself to be eye witness of the alleged occurrence and his statement under section 164 of the Cr. P.C was recorded and in the said statement, he stated that it was the petitioner who committed murder of his father. It also came to light that the petitioner wanted to marry with the wife of the deceased and when he could not succeed, he committed the alleged crime. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the injury sustained by the petitioner does not seem to be suicidal injury and it is not possible for a person to cause injury on him on his back. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let petitioner, Bholu @ Moiz Khan, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghatty, Gaya in Sherghatty (Dobhi) P.S. Case no. 243/2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)