IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 729 of 2010 (S/S) Vinod Kumar and Others. ……Petitioners Versus State and others. …….Respondents Mr. Sandeep Kothari and Mr. V.K. Kaparwan, Advocates for the petitioners. Mr. K.C. Tiwari, Brief Holder for respondents No. 1,2 and 5. Ms. Bina Pande, Standing Counsel for respondents No. 3 and 4. Dated:-07-09-2010 Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By means of this petition, the petitioners have sought following reliefs:- “1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to pay the deputation allowance to the petitioners as admissible under the relevant Government Orders; 2. Issue any other writ order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of this case. 3. Award the cost of writ petition to the petitioners.” Having heard learned counsel for the parties, the petitioners are given liberty to file a fresh representation for redressal of grievance to the appropriate authority. If the representation is made, the same shall be decided by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 8 weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (B.S.Verma, J.) 07-09-2010 S