IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 2431 of 2003 Between: Smt. Basava Siva Parvathi W/o Sambasiva Rao R/o Door No.11-25-321, Main Road, Vijayawada-1. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner M.C.V., Vijayawada, Krishna Dist. 2 The Vice-Chairman VGTM, Vijayawada Urban Development Authority, Vijayawada, Krishna Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction declaring the proposed action of the respondents herein in trying to demolish the building of the petitioner bearing Door No.11-25-321, Main Road Vijayawada one town, Krishna Dist., for the purpose of Road widening of Main Road without recourse to the provisions of L.A., act or in accordance with the decision of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.20620/2002 dt 11.10.2002 as arbitrary and without jurisdiction consequently order stay of all further proceedings. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.C.C.S.SASTRY Counsel for the Respondents.:SMT. G.JHANSI, STANDING COUNSEL. The Court made the following : ORDER: Petitioner Smt.Basava Siva Parvathi claims to be the owner of building bearing Door No.11-25-321, Main Road, Vijayawada. It is a three storied building. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents are contemplating to demolish a portion of the building in the road widening without following the due process of law. 2. Rule Nisi came to be issued on 07.02.2003. An interim direction not to demolish, except following the guidelines in WP No.20884 of 1997 dated 03.02.1998 to the respondents has been given vide order dated 07.02.2003 passed in WPMP No.3192 of 2003. 3. When the writ petition came up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the respondents will follow the guidelines issued in WP NO.20884 of 1997 dated 03.02.1998 in the event of a portion of the building owned by the petitioner is required to be demolished in road widening. 4. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to follow the guidelines issued in WP NO.20884 of 1997 dated 03.02.1998 in the event of a portion of the building owned by the petitioner is required to be demolished for the purpose of road widening. No costs. ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date:23rd June, 2009. cs ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRK}