1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Civil Application (cao) No. 573 of 2009 (In MCA St. 4050/09 in SA 203/08) Municipal Corporation of City of Amravati ...Versus... Sant Kanwarram education & Social Welfare Society, Amravati. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. J.B. Kasate Advocate for applicant. Mr. V.M. Deshpande Advocate for Respondent. … CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 30.09.2011. CAO No. 573/09 Heard. This is an application for condonation of delay of 111 days in preferring review application. For the reasons stated in the application, this Court is satisfied that there are good and sufficient reasons to condone the delay. Hence, delay is condoned. CAO NO. 573/09 is disposed of. MCA St.No. 4050/09 Heard. The only ground of challenge in this application is that the Division Bench judgment of this Court in 1988 Mh.L.J. 465 – Sindhi 2 Hindi Vidya Samiti, Nagpur v. The City Nagpur Corporation was not pointed out to the learned Single Judge who decided the main matter. Learned counsel for the review applicant also contended that the judgment of apex court in (1992) 3 SCC 390 – Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Children Book Trust has not been properly considered. According to me, these submissions cannot be canvassed in review. Since learned counsel for the applicant has submitted about wrong consideration of judgments aforesaid as ground for review, I do not think that the same can be a ground for review. Hence review application is dismissed. Judge /TA/