:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2928 OF 2005 Tejindersingh Manmohansingh Bindra and Ors. .. Petitioners Vs. Regional Transport Officer, Nashik and ors. .. Respondents Mr. S.S. Kulkarni for Petitioners. Mr. D.S. Mhaispurkar, APP for State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : B. H. MARLAPALLE & : B. H. MARLAPALLE & : B. H. MARLAPALLE & SMT. SMT. SMT. R.S. DALVI,JJ. R.S. DALVI,JJ. R.S. DALVI,JJ. Date Date Date : January 16, 2006. : January 16, 2006. : January 16, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Mr. Kulkarni, the learned counsel for the petitioners states that subsequent to the orders passed by this court on 23/12/2005 he has obtained instructions from the petitioners and has been informed that the petitioners’ applications have been allowed by the Competent Authority concerned. Therefore, nothing further survives in this petition. 2. Mr. Kulkarni then suggested that the respondents should be directed to follow the provisions of law in future also when such applications are received. Undoubtedly, the respondents are required to take steps as provided :2: under the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 and in case there is any non compliance or inaction on the part of the State the petitioners are similarly placed citizens and are at liberty to seek appropriate remedy for directions. 3. Petition stands disposed off as infructuous. (Smt.R.S. (Smt.R.S. (Smt.R.S. Dalvi,J.) Dalvi,J.) Dalvi,J.) (B.H. (B.H. (B.H. Marlapalle, J.) Marlapalle, J.) Marlapalle, J.)