1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 104 OF 2008 Pratibha Niketan Education Society, Nanded, throgh Secretary & ors. ...Petitioners VERSUS The State of Maharashtra through Secretary & ors. ...Respondents ..... Shri S.M.Kulkarni, advocate for the petitioners Shri D.V.Tele, AGP for respondent nos. 1 and 2 Shri G.G.Suryawanshi, advocate for respondent no.3 ..... CORAM : S.B.DESHMUKH AND SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, JJ. DATED : 2nd December, 2009. PER COURT : 1 We heard Shri S.M.Kulkarni, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri D.V.Tele, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 and 2 and Shri G.G.Suryawanshi, learned counsel for respondent no.3. 2 Shri Kulkarni, learned counsel points out earlier order 2 passed by this court on 10.1.2008. He also points out the subsequent events i.e. promotion to respondent no.3 and approval granted by the Education Officer to respondent no.3. These facts are not disputed on behalf of the respondents. 3 In this writ petition, communication dated 13.12.2007 issued under the signature of the Education Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nanded is challenged. A xerox copy of order passed by this court in Writ Petition No. 104 of 2008 is placed on record and same is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification purpose. 4 In view of the subsequent developments, we feel that nothing remains to be agitated in this writ petition. This petition can be disposed of in view of the subsequent events i.e. promotion to respondent no.3 and approval by the Education Officer to respondent no.3. 5 This petition, therefore, stands disposed of. No costs. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) (S.B.DESHMUKH, J.) dbm/wp104.08