IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITIONS NO.3565 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders ... CORAM : B.R.GAVAI & A.A.SAYED,JJ DATE : 6/10/2010 1] The petitioner challenges the order dated 31/3/2010 vide which the contract allotted in favour of the petitioner came to be cancelled. 2] From the order dated 31/3/2010, it would reveal that the respondent authorities have given cogent reasons as to why contract granted in favour of petitioner is cancelled. 3] In contractual matters, while exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Court is only permitted to see as to whether the reasons given by the authority are arbitrary, irrational or irrelevant. 4] Under this jurisdiction, it is not permissible to examine the question as to whether the reasons given are sufficient or not. 5] From the perusal of the impugned order, it cannot be said that the reasons given are either arbitrary, irrational or irrelevent. 6] In any case, since the matter arises out of contractual obligations, the petitioner always has an alternate efficacious remedy available to him in law. 7] In that view of the matter, no case is made out. Petition is dismissed. [A.A.SAYEDJ.] [B.R.GAVAI,J.] umg/wp3565-10