IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 16484 of 2009 Between: P. Ramchander S/oa. Late P. Narasimha R/o. H.No. 10-3-20/3/70, Addagutta, East Marredpally Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Deputy Commissioner of Police North Zone, Hyderabad. 2 The Station House Officer, P.S. Chilkalguda, Hyderabad. 3 Vaddera Mohan S/o. Late D. Sailu R/o. 10-3-2/3/5/28, Vadderabasthi Near Renuka Yellamma Temple, Addagutta , East Marredpalli, Secunderabad. 4 Vaddera Swamy S/o. Late D. Sailu R/o. 10-3-2/3/5/28, Vadderabasthi Near Renuka Yellamma Temple, Addagutta , East Marredpalli Secunderabad. 5 Kumar S/o. Not known R/o. Vadderabasthi Near Renuka Yellamma Temple, Addagutta , East Marredpalli Secunderabad. 6 Giri S/o. Not known R/o. Vadderabasthi Near Renuka Yellamma Temple, Addagutta , East Marredpalli Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not register the FIR is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to register the FIR against the respondents No.3 to 6 and take necessary legal action against them. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.VENKATESWARA RAO PITCHUKA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO.16484 OF 2009 ORDER: 1 The petitioner approached this court and filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not register the FIR is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to register the FIR against the respondents No.3 to 6 and take necessary legal action against them and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” 2 On instructions the learned Assistant Government Pleader submitted that a case in Cr.No.504 of 2009 was registered against the accused therein on 17.8.2009 for the offence punishable under Section 506 of IPC. In the light of the said registration of crime, this court is of the view that no further orders need be passed in this Writ Petition. 3 However, the learned counsel for the petitioner tried to impress upon the court stating that the allegations against the accused therein are very severe, but, however, the police have registered the crime only for the offence punishable under section 506 of IPC. It is not for this court to go into the said aspect. If the petitioner is having any grievance about the registration of the said crime, he can resort to the provisions of Section 154 of Cr.P.C., which permits the petitioner to report the matter to the Superintendent of Police. Further, it is always open for the petitioner to file a private complaint as provided for under Section 200 of Cr.P.C. 4 With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. -------------- 19.08.2009 kvsn