IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST JULY 2010 / 30TH ASHADHA 1932 RP.No. 114 of 2008(P) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.16525/2007 Dated 04/07/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S):RESPONDENTS IN THE WRIT PETITION --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER, HR & CE (ADMN.) DEPARTMENT, CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HR & CE (ADMN.) DEPARTMENT, KOZHIKODE. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, HR & CE (ADMN.) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.ARAVINDKUMAR BABU RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT/PETITIONER ---------------------------------------------------------------- SREEMAD ANANTHESWARA TEMPLE, MANJESWAR, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT B.RATNAKARA KAMATH, S/O.G.NARASIMHA KAMATH RESIDING AT REGU NIVAS, KONCHADY,PODUVINANGADY, MANGALORE, KARNATAKA. SRI.KODOTH SREEDHARAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC & V.K.MOHANAN, JJ. ============================ R.P.NO. 114 OF 2008 in WP(C) No.16525 of 2007 ====================== Dated this the 21st day of July, 2010 O R D ER Antony Dominic, J. Heard the learned Government Pleader and also the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner. 2. From the averments in the review petition, it is seen that it is the first petitioner herein, who is to pass orders on the proposal which is to be submitted as directed in the judgment under review and not the Assistant Commissioner. It is also pointed out that the officer who returned the proposal is not the Assistant Commissioner, but it was the Commissioner himself. 3. In view of the submissions thus made, while we record the submission of the learned Government Pleader that it was the first petitioner herein who returned the proposal to the petitioner in the writ petition, we modify the direction in the judgment and direct that the first petitioner shall pass orders on the fresh application to be submitted as directed in the judgment. Review petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp V.K.MOHANAN, JUDGE