IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24207 of 2009 ANZAR KHAN son of Mofizul Khan, resident of village- Paithan Kawai, P.S.- Manigachhi, District- Darbhanga. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 01.09.2009 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The offence alleged is under sections 341, 323, 376/311 & 509 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner was allowed bail and he continued to remain present on the dates fixed in the case till it was cancelled on 12.05.1999 since the petitioner was given to understand that the offence against him is minor and he is not required to remain present subsequently, Petitioner also could not know that his bail was cancelled. Besides the fact that the matter was compromised the petitioner also bona fide felt that he is not required to be present in the case any more. In the above circumstances, it is submitted that the misuse of the privilege of bail was not intentional. Petitioner undertakes to remain present on each and every date fixed in the case save and except for any cogent reason. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Darbhanga, in connection with Manigachhi P.S. Case No. 129 of 1991, S.Tr. No.176 of 1995. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)