IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.18614 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision : 19.05.2010 Sonu ...Petitioner Versus Municipal Council, Panipat …Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL **** Present: Mr. R K Malik, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Kohal Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjay Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondent. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL) The petitioner has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 13.11.2009 (Annexure P-4) whereby his services were ordered to be terminated. The petitioner has filed an application under Section 151, Code of Civil Procedure, stating that the controversy involved in the instant writ petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in CWP No.18618 of 2009 (Chand V. Municipal Council, Panipat) decided on 6.5.2010 (Annexure P-6), and, therefore, the same may be allowed in terms thereof. Learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute that the controversy in the present writ petition is similar to the one involved in CWP No.18168 of 2009 and has agreed that it may be disposed of in the same terms. In view of the consensus between the parties, the factual matrix of the present case is not being reproduced. Since the parties are agreed that the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment dated 6.5.2010 passed in CWP No.18618 of 2009 ibid, the writ petition is disposed of in the same terms. May 19, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) atulsethi JUDGE