1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 7927 of 2011 Decided on: 23rd September, 2011. Sita Devi .....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & another .....Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. ______________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) According to the petitioner, the husband of the petitioner is entitled to the benefit of the judgment rendered in Mool Raj Upadhyaya vs. State of H.P. and others, 1994 Supp. (2) SCC 316. 2. The learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. Petitioner submits that she would file an appropriate representation furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a 2 period of one month from today. It is always open for her to do so. The second respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, in light also of the decision referred to above within a period of another four months. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the judgment, referred to above and a copy of the writ petition, while submitting the representation. 3. The writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 23rd September, 2011. (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (hl) Judge.