IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 29TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 7TH ASWINA 1931 RP.No. 898 of 2009(A) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.24998/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN THE WRIT PETITION ----------------------------------------------------- K.A.HAROON RASHEED, SECRETARY, THRISSUR DISTRICT COMMITTEE, KERALA STATE MUSLIM LEAGUE, AMBADY LANE, KOKKALA, THRISSUR-21. BY ADV. SRI.G.HARIHARAN SRI.PRAVEEN.H. RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K. SANILKUMAR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- R.P.No.898 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 29th day of September, 2009. O R D E R Review is sought on the basis that Annexure-II judgment has been issued without complying with the direction in Annexure-I judgment. A reading of the Annexure-II judgment does not give any indication in support of what the review petitioner submits. Even if what is submitted is correct, it may either be a case to be proceeded under the Contempt of Courts Act or by filing a writ petition challenging the ultimate order which is to be passed. In either of these cases review of the judgment is not warranted. Review Petition fails and is dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/