63# $~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + CRL.M.C. 2243/2011 JASMIT SINGH &ORS. Petitioners Through: Mr. Akshay Sahni, Advocate with Petitioners in person. versus STATE & ANR. Respondents Through: Mr. Pawan Bahl, APP for the State with HC Surender Kumar and SI Rajkumar,PS LajpatNagar,Delhi. Mr. Nitesh Mehra and Mr. Ankur Garg, Advocatesfor RespondentNo.2 with Respondent No. 2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER o/„ 20.07.2011 CrI. M.A. 8136/2011 (Exemption) Allowed, subjectto alljust exceptions. Crl. M.C. No. 2243/2011 Issue notice. LearnedAPP acceptsnotice on behalfof the State. Learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of Respondent No. 2/Complainant. This is a petitionfor quashingof FIR No. 500/2007under Sections 323/341/34IPG registeredat PS LajpatNagar,New Delhi on the complaint CRL.M.C.2243/2011 Page 1 of 3 \ Signing Date:31.08.2024 17:26:12 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified of Mr. Kapil Bakshi. As per the FIR it was allegedthat in the eveningof 27^''May, 2007 whentheComplainant/RespondentNo. 2 wentto the shop to smoke cigarette,two other boys were also with him. Some days ago a quarrelwas takenplace betweenthe Complainantand RespondentNo. 2 on some issue. That day again there were exchange of hot argumentson the same issue pursuanttheretoJasmeetSingh attackedthe Complainantwith a sharp weapondue to which he sustainedcut injuryon his cheek and started bleeding. The Complainant/RespondentNo. 2 Mr. Kapil Bakshi is present is presentin person and is identifiedby his counsel. He states that he has amicably settled the matter with the intervention of the friends and neighboursand he does not wantto pursuethe abovementionedFIR and the proceedingspursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no usefiilpurposewill be servedin continuanceofthe proceedings,it wouldbe in the interest of justice to quash the abovementionedFIR and the proceedingspursuantthereto.There is no legal impedimentin quashingthe FIR. CRL.M.C. 2243/2011 Page 2 of3 n/ Consequently,FIR No. 500/2007 under Sections 323/341/34 IPC registeredat PS LajpatNagar,New Delhi and proceedingspursuantthereto are hereby quashed. Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court. The petition is disposed of. Order dasti. MUKTA GUPTA, J. JULY 20,2011 p^'cK'evo^ CRL.M.C. 2243/2011 Page 3 of3 I'