WPSS 949 2007 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri S.C. Bhatt, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Paresh Tripathi, learned Brief Holder for State of Uttarakhand on behalf of respondents. Learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the controversy raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 943 (S/S) of 2007, (Sanjay Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Uttarakhand & Ors.), therefore, the present writ petition may also be decided on the same terms and conditions of the aforesaid judgment. In view of the above statement, I direct the petitioners to make representation before the appropriate authority and if the allegations made by the petitioners in their representation are correct, as directed by this Court in the case Sanjay Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Uttarakhand & Ors., the appropriate authority may pass orders on the representation of the petitioners, keeping in view the observations made in the body of the judgment in the case of Sanjay Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Uttarakhand & Ors, within a period of ten days from the date of production of a certified copy of this order along with the representation , if any, moved by the petitioners before him. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of on the same terms and observations made by this Court vide judgment and order dated 06.08.2007 in Writ Petition No. 943 (S/S) of 2007, (Sanjay Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Uttarakhand & Ors. ). All the pending applications stand disposed of. (M.M.G., J.) 06.08.2007 VKS