IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 1306 of 2011 Decided on: March 17, 2011. Chuni Lal …………Petitioner. vs. State of H.P. and anr. ………..Respondents. _______________________________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner : Ms.Sunita Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr.R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr.J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner claims the benefit of ad hoc service followed by regular service for the purpose of pension and increments. According to the petitioner, the issue is covered in his favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in LPA No.36 of 2010, Sita Ram vs. State. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent concerned to examine the matter in the light of the judgment referred to above and take appropriate action thereon within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment, alongwith a copy of the writ petition and a copy of the judgment referred to above, by the petitioner. 2 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice March 17, 2011 (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tilak/pankaj) Judge.