1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1433/2009. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 29 th September,2009. 1. Heard Mr.Suryawanshi for the applicant and Mr. RN Deshmukh for the respondent. 2. There is delay of 750 days in causing to file Revision. Mr.Deshmukh has opposed to entertain the application by filing an affidavit of Mohammad Yusuf Hasmullaha, the accused in the matter. Mr. Deshmukh submits that there is no justifiable ground to condone the delay. 3. It is a matter of record, there is already a Revision preferred by the present respondent against the order of conviction being Criminal Revision Application No.111/2007 filed on 16th April, 2007. It follows that the present applicant/original complainant is aggrieved by the so-called inadequate imposition of conviction. The matter need to be addressed by the Court, even ordinarily by hearing the complainant - Ayyubkha. Consequently, the delay is not 2 deliberate, it is condoned. Criminal Application is allowed in above terms. The complainant to pay costs of Rs.500/- to the accused within a month. ( K.U.CHANDIWAL ) JUDGE bdv/cran1433.09