THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY W.P.No.22841 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner made certain constructions over the site, in 18-3-507/1 of Hamambowli, Laldarwaja, Hyderabad. Her attempt to get the unauthorized construction regularized, did not fructify. An appeal is said to be pending. The respondent issued a notice, dated 13.10.2009, under Section 452 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act (for short ‘the Act’), requiring the petitioner to explain as to why the unauthorized construction be not demolished. The petitioner claims to have submitted her explanation to the show cause notice. The same is challenged in this Writ Petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent. The Act prescribes a detailed procedure to be followed, whenever the Corporation proposes to demolish the structures. Initially, a show cause notice is to be issued, and thereafter, a final notice under Section 636 of the Act, on consideration of the explanation. The petitioner is not able to point out any legal, or factual, infirmity in the show cause notice. Inasmuch as the petitioner has already submitted her explanation, she has to wait till a further notice under Section 636 of the Act, or any other provision, is issued. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing that, any final action, vis-à-vis the construction made by the petitioner, shall be taken, only after notice under Section 636 of the Act, is issued, on consideration of the explanation submitted by the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Dated:23.10.2009 Note: Communicate operative portion of the order by wire at party’s costs. (B/O) GJ