IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2083 of 2009 SMT. SANGEETA KUMARI SANGITA KUMARI, WIFE OF SRI PANKAJ KUMAR, DAUGHTER OF SRI RABINDRA PRASAD, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA BANSKOTHI, D.N. DAS LANE, LANGERTOLI, P.S. KADAM KUAN, DISTT. PATNA. Versus PANKAJ KUMAR, SON OF DINESH PRASAD BARNWAL RESIDENT OF MOHALLA MADHOPUR, P.S. KOTWALI, P.O. MUNGER, DISTT-MUNGER AT PRESENT RESIDING AT 439C, LSHIPRA SUN CITY, INDRAPURAM, P.S. INDRAPURAM,DISTT.GAZIABAD, U.P. For the Petitioner:Mr.Ratna Das, Advocate For the Opposite Party: Mr.Avinash,Advocate ----------- 5. 21.1.2010. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the civil revision as the same is not maintainable as per the specific bar under Section 19(5) of the Family Courts Act,1984 has been interpreted by Division Bench of this Court in Jagdish Prasad Chouhan v. Bhuneshwar Chouhan and anr.,reported in 2009(4) BBCJ, 442. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner wants to avail any other remedy, if available under law to him. Opposite party has appeared and raised no objection. - 2 - In that view of the matter, the civil revision is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J.) N.H/