( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5416 OF 2010 Savita d/o. Pandit Choudhari .. Petitioner Versus Pandit s/o. Babarao Choudhari and Ors. .. Respondents Mr. Amit Mukhedkar, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 16.08.2010 P.C. :- 1. Heard. The application filed by present petitioner for adducing of further evidence came to be rejected vide impugned order dated 22nd March, 2010. Learned Judge of the Trial Court held that since evidence of both sides was concluded on 05.01.2010 and the matter was posted for final arguments on atleast seven dates thereafter i.e. on 13.01.2010, 25.01.2010, 29.01.2010, 01.02.2010, 08.02.2010, 16.02.2010, 23.02.2010, so on and so forth, yet, atleast more than 2 ½ months the petitioner kept silence and went on ( 2 ) seeking adjournments. Lastly, the petitioner applied on 22nd March, 2010, seeking permission to lead further evidence. The attempt was found to be an act which was for the purpose of protracting the trial. Learned Civil Judge, therefore, considered impact of amended Rule 17-A of Order 18 of the Code of Civil Procedure and rejected the application. The discretionary order cannot be found to be faulted with. Petition dismissed. [V.R. KINGAONKAR,J.] snk/2010/AUG10/wp5416.10