In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. *** CR No.2549 of 2011 (O&M) Decided on 20.4.2011. Krishna Wati --Petitioner vs. Kanchan Gakkar --Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.Rajiv Joshi,Advocate,for the petitioner Rakesh Kumar Jain,J: (Oral) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 05.1.2011 passed by learned Rent Controller, Jalandhar, by which defence of the petitioner has been struck off for non-filing of the written statement within the prescribed time. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a widow aged about 85 years. She is living in the demised premises on payment of `100/- as rent. He further submits that the petitioner had no means to file the eviction petition as she is suing through the Legal Aid before the Court below and before this Court, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that he has charged only the expenses to file the present revision petition. C.R.No.2549 of 2011 -2- Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of this case, the impugned order is set aside and one more opportunity is given to the petitioner to file the written statement on the date already fixed. April 20,2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge