Civil Revision No. 6341 of 2006 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6341 of 2006 Date of Decision: 22.4.2009 Darshan Singh ......Petitioner Versus Kanta Devi and others .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri B.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri Tribhuwan Singla, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 to 5. HEMANT GUPTA, J (Oral). The challenge in the present revision petition is to the order passed by the learned trial Court on 17.10.2006, whereby an application filed by the plaintiff-respondents to file the suit as indigent persons, was allowed. The plaintiff-respondents filed a suit for recovery of Rs.5,36,000/- against defendant-Darshan Singh (the present petitioner) on the basis of pronote and receipt dated 10.2.2002. As per the plaintiffs, the aforesaid amount was borrowed by the defendant from Satpal, predecessor- in-interest of the plaintiffs. Since the plaintiffs were not possessed of sufficient means to affix the Court fee, the learned trial Court after Civil Revision No. 6341 of 2006 (2) recording evidence to this effect, allowed the prayer made by the plaintiffs to file the suit as indigent persons. The order passed by the learned trial Court gives adequate reasons as to why the the plaintiffs were permitted to sue as indigent persons. It was found that the estate of Satpal, inherited by the plaintiffs, has been sold and, therefore, they are not owners of any immovable property. In view of the said fact, I do not find any patent illegality and material irregularity in the impugned order, which may warrant interference by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. Hence, the present revision petition is dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 22-04-2009 ds