IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION N0.~ . OF 2006 PETITIONER: ^Gautam Prasad Naik, S/o Dibyanand Nayak, Aged about 44 years, presently posted and working as Multi Purpose Worker ,...<. (MPW) Section Madva, ^••""te^" .. Community Health Center, Dabra, C--o?.^-y ..•••""" District Janjgir-Champa (CG). ^' ..••••"'.'•^ ^^"^•^' ^6°'- •fS-.<>•-•" RESPONDENTS /., -\s- ,^^"^ l^ ,^ .^s \A^^V •<>'•• Versus 1. State ofChhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Health, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Under Secretary, Department of Health, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. ChiefMedical Officer District Janjgir-Chamap (CG). .4. Block Medical Officer Dabra, District Janjgir-Champa (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFJNDIA XI-HC-22 TSf ^ll'yid^, »Tnu'i6,(s|0i<rfy 3TT^?I IIHCTI gi*<i«i RTq'ach _..^.^.s§$2/ ra>" V^ 200^ Rl'b.d sn^rw ^iNisn^r aiiiN;^rf?(T \ 3t1^TBTttTgT(rf?(T Sr. HoriShankar- Pate!. couns ^irafe^T ITTIRTl''ff fecA tR^ZK ^iSrf^lTSfT^T y for the petitioner. Mrs. An'iu Ahuja, &eputy So^t. Advocate for" the State/r'esDondents, on advance copy. By the instant writ peti1|ion under' (•'.rticle 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner]has cha!ien9ed his transfer order dated 7-7-2006 passed by respondent N^o.2, whereby the petitioner' has been ^!th Centre, AAahor'a, Block; Baikunthpur, transferred from Janjgir to Sub He District; Korea. Learne.d counsel for the pet been transfe.rred show/ing that he h^ i.rhereas, no such request was madi| besn tfansfei'red on a wr'ong gr'oi. Itioner argued that the petitloner has 's been transferred on his own request, ; by the petitioner, therefore, he has hd. He iubmits that therefore, the petitionsr may be a!!owed to make 4 repressntation to respondent No,£ ti which learned counsel aooearina for l r"f" >•< ] lf-Ei ff ^lfflE !, naving neafa ieapned counsel facts cnd cj"curnstances of the casi he Stute/resDondents has no ob.iection. •fnr +' Tor' Tiie parTies, noving "egard and without expr'essing any' opiriion on merite of the case, the pr-cyer rt>ad<| by Isar-ned counsei for the petitioner uppsur's •S'o be just, fair and reasonab e. Therefor'e, the pstitioner Is allowed iiiake u dstailed representation ant[e%ing copy of the Enstant writ petition, r'sisifi^ vu nis eir'isvSisiess TO r'sssoneieii TUFH, y ^ondent No.2 shai! decids s receipt, isonsideririg all the gri + M-, 7 No.i.: wiThin ten tfays Trom Today an< the same within 30 dflys from the date ^vonces t'aised by the petitioner, in an (if®^^-) ^ 'i^^^r<rw~~Fwys' / .:,-^-<J"^^/^-<^' XI-HC-22 3^^i^id'4,8'Tfl<i'is, Picii+iy tlTHMIShllW 311^1 MDcb _.ta^;.s^2| T<h ?R; 200 ^ ^vs. sn^rqir RFIWSTT^T SIHiti Hf?(T sn^T^cITWlrf?^ s- wifefrr imRfr'tf te^t (f^siT ^isri^iTsn^T /s Soma ^ Gbjcetive r-iunner, in Qccor'donce |n'ith law. In the mean while, if the B&titioner has not been "elisved til r&prss^nTQTion TUOG Dy.?i;m i^ ascj^ WEth the dir-ections u'fofesaii -"-...:i.: .-A^-;^-.^A|i, S* /*^.?>DKi^ '">' i^vnse^u^nr<y, /^,^vi/./r.'^o.v _^ ._.r,,-^^,.^.^^ 'Q t ^ p'ji.iKeiQ-I «.c Partiss are entitled for cert I date. he shail not be re'ieved. till the , the w"it petition siwids disposed of. 24/2006 w,d T.A.No.73SO/2006 also i<id sopy of this order'. Sd:l- L.C. B:h0i3:BO Judge (iflA^lyil) <Si •<; ^ ^ '<5e