IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3084 OF 2008 (WRIT PETITION NO.700 OF 2008) Nirmala Bapusaheb Rode ...Applicant Vs. Sudhakar Shriram Mancharkar & Anr. ...Respondents Mr.A.B.Avhad, Advocate for the Applicant Ms. Manisha Devkar i/b. Ms.Revati Mohite Dere, Advocate for Respondent No.1 Mrs.R.V.Newton, A.P.P for the State CORAM: SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATED: 3RD NOVEMBER, 2009 P.C. 1.The Applicant is the initial complainant. The complaint has been filed by one teacher against another. The prosecution of the complaint under Section 506 of the I.P.C is only to be considered. 2.The Respondent No.1 has been acquitted of the offences punishable under Sections 353 and 509 of the I.P.C. The learned Magistrate has considered the presence of Respondent No.1 in the School of the Applicant though he was serving in another School. That aspect has not been considered in the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge. That aspect requires consideration. Hence, Appeal is admitted. (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.)