IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 44 of 2006 (M/B) Radhey Shyam s/o Late Dilawar Singh, R/o Milap Nagar, P.S. Kotwali, Roorkee, District Haridwar ………. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Senior Superintendent of Police, Haridwar. 2. Station House Officer, P.S. Ranipur, District Haridwar. 3. Karam Singh s/o Chudha R/o Village Brahmpuri, P.S. Ranipur, District Haridwar ………. Respondents Petitioner’s counsel absent. Sri D.K.Sharma, Government Advocate for respondents 1 and 2. None for respondent no. 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Petitioner’s counsel absent. Sri D.K.Sharma, Government Advocate for respondents 1 and 2. None for respondent no. 3. 2. Sri Sharma, the learned Government Advocate submits that the writ petition field by the petitioner Radhey Shyam seeking quashing of the first information report and the case registered against him has now become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation has filed final report before the concerning Magistrate. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 07.06.2006 07.06.2006 A