1 ca13418.09 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13418 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.529 OF 2007 [ Sakhahari s/o Narhari Patil vs. Mathurabai w/o Vaijanath Kamble & Ors. ] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. B.A. Shinde, Advocate for applicant. Mr. B.S.Kudale,Advocate for R-1. Mr. C.V. Dharurkar, Advocate for R-6A to 6D. Mr. M.P. Kale, Advocate for R-3,4A,4B & 5. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 20TH DECEMBER, 2011 PER COURT : . Heard learned Counsel appearing for the applicant. 2. Perused the contents of the application. Learned Counsel appearing for the proposed legal heirs of deceased respondent No.4 vehemently opposed the 2 ca13418.09 application. In view of the provisions of Order 22 Rule 10A of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Pleader for deceased respondent No. 4 was supposed to inform this Court about the death of respondent No.4. However, it appears that, no such information is given to this Court and as a result, there is delay in filing this application for bringing legal heirs of deceased respondent No. 4 on record. 3. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A) and (B) and same stands disposed of. . Necessary amendment to be carried out within three weeks from today. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/DEC11