1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY PETITION NO.641 OF 1999 Bank of Baroda. ..Petitioner. V/s. Sunil Great(Hosiery Yarn & Kapada) Processors Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondent. Ms.A.Nityananthi Nadar i/b. M/s. N.C.Dalal & Co. for Central Bank of India-intervenor. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : MARCH 19, 2008. DATE : MARCH 19, 2008. DATE : MARCH 19, 2008. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. None appears for the Petitioner. Counsel for the Central Bank of India submits that the claim in the present Petition has already been settled between the parties long back. According to her, nothing survives for consideration in the present Petition. 2. Office note indicates that the Petitioner has not filed affidavit of publication nor served notice under Rule 28 on the Respondent so far. Besides, no claim in support or opposition of the Petition was received. Similarly, no other Company Petition praying for winding up of the Respondent company is pending in this Court. 2 3. Taking overall view of the matter, this Petition though admitted is dismissed for non-prosecution in terms of this Order. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J)