In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh F.A.O. No.197 of 1993 Date of decision: December 23, 2009 Ujagar Singh and others .. Appellants Vs. Bal Kishan Sharma and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Satinder Khanna, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Gopal Mittal, Advocate for the Insurance Company. A.N. Jindal, J The appellants- claimants No. 2 to 4 have preferred this appeal against the award dated 3.11.1992 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ludhiana, awarding compensation to the tune of Rs.65200/- to the appellants No.3, Rs.15,000/- each to the claimants No.1 and 2 and against the respondents No.1 to 5. Since the widow Raj Rani was re-employed, obviously for that reason she has not preferred any appeal. However, the old parents of the deceased as well as minor son Rikki have come up in appeal for enhancement of compensation. The deceased was drawing the salary of Rs.3659-58 per month. No doubt, in lieu of the job which the deceased was holding, Raj Rani widow was given the job. However, after re-marrying she is not maintaining the appellants, as such, the appellants are certainly entitled to some maintenance to pull on their lives. Under the circumstances, with the consensus of the parties, this appeal is partly allowed. Now the appellants would be entitled to receive a sum of Rs.50,000/- over and above the award amount, in the above mentioned proportions, which would be paid by the respondents within 45 days from the date of receipt of copy of the order failing which the appellants would be entitled to receive interest at the same rate as awarded by the Tribunal. December 23, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge