SCA/6389/1997 /2 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 6389 to 6393 of 1997 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================== 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ============================================================== MOHANBHAI NARAYANCHAND KHUBCHANDANI & 1 - Petitioner(s) Versus RAMJIBHAI VANABHAI VAGRI & 3 - Respondent(s) ============================================================== Appearance : MR RN SHAH for Petitioners. MR SHAKIL S SHAIKH for Respondent Nos.1-3. MS PB SHETH Ld. AGP for Respondent No.4. ================================================================== CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Date : 08/12/2005 COMMON ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Mr.R.N.Shah, the learned Advocate for the petitioners states that respondent Nos.1 and 2 had filed Special Civil Suit No.81 of 1996 against the present petitioners and respondent No.3 herein, in respect of the SCA/6389/1997 2/2 JUDGMENT land in question, in the Court of learned 2nd Joint Civil Judge (S.D.), Navsari and that consent decree was passed in the said suit on 22nd November,1996. Mr.S.S.Shaikh, the learned Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 3, agrees. Mr.R.N.Shah produces a copy of the consent decree which is taken on record. He states that the present proceedings come to an end in view of the said consent decree. He, therefore, does not press these petitions. Petitions are accordingly disposed of as not pressed. Rule is discharged. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated. (M.C.Patel,J.) (vipul)