ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2788 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.2788 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.2788 OF 2005 Mrs. Manisha Naresh Batra & Ors. ...Petitioners. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.Filji Febrics for the Petitioner. Mr.P.B.Naiknaware, for Respondent No.2. Mr.S.N.Bhosle for Respondent No.3. Ms. U.V.Kejariwal for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : BILAL : BILAL : BILAL NAZKI & NAZKI & NAZKI & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. V.MOHTA, JJ. V.MOHTA, JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 2ND FEBRUARY, 2009. : 2ND FEBRUARY, 2009. : 2ND FEBRUARY, 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. The Complainant belongs to the Schedule Caste, married in a upper class family. In his complaint he has stated that on 28/09/2004 in the evening while he was watching some programme relating to the Ganpati Visarjan, the accused persons came to beat him. When his wife tried to intervene, they started quarrelling and reproached him using some derogatory words to his caste. 2. Accused are sisters of the wife of the ( 2 ) Complainant. The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners submit that the Complaint was made only because the Petitioners are not entertained the Complainant Respondent No.2. The questions raised in this proceeding are being investigated by the Police and the police has filed a report. The Petitioners had obtained a stay from this Court in the year 2005. Since, we do not find any ground to quash the complaint, which prima facie discloses an offence committed by the Petitioners. 3. The Writ Petition is dismissed. The interim order, if any, stands vacated. (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) (BILAL (BILAL (BILAL NAZKI, J.) NAZKI, J.) NAZKI, J.)