IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42011 of 2011 Pinku Yadav son of Sri Chhotan Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 23.12.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 143, 147, 323, 504, 325, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that there is a counter version with regard to the same occurrence and there is no specific overt act alleged against the petitioner, let the petitioner above named be released on bail if charges have been framed or after framing of charge on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. 3rd, Jamui in connection with S.T. No.462 of 2010 arising out of Sikandra/Chandradeep P.S. Case No.196 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the - 2 - bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )