1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR C. A. W. NO. 2525 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2108 OF 2010 ( Bank Colony Welfare Society & Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ) ........................................................................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders ........................................................................................................................................................................ Shri M. P. Lala Adv for petitioner. Shri Kale AGP for respondents-State 1 & 5. Shri S. K. Mishra Adv for respondents 2, 3 & 4. Shri R. L. Khapre Adv for respondents 7 to 10. Shri D. N. Dani Adv for respondents 11 to 17. CORAM: B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & A. P. BHANGALE JJ. DATED: 26th SEPTEMBER, 2011. . Heard Shri Khapre learned counsel for the applicants- respondents Shri Lala learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Dani learned counsel for respondents 11 to 17, learned AGP for respondents 1 and 5, and Shri Mishra learned counsel for respondents 2, 3 and 4. Though Shri Lala learned counsel is strongly opposing, it is apparent that at this stage it is not necessary for this Court to go into the merits of the controversy. According to applicants their building plan is not being considered because of interim orders passed by this Court. Shri Lala is disputing this position. In this situation we allowed the applicants to be impleaded 2 as party respondents no.18 to 23. Necessary amendment be carried out by applicants within one week from today. Civil Application (CAW) is accordingly allowed and disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE svk