IN THE MAM’IYA PRADESH STATE AMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL M L JABALpuR g 0.1:. NoCaMo;/0F 2000 m ggij w, PETITIONER . A.R.Lodh, aged about 60 years and A Months son of P.G. College Ambikapur, District Surguaa(M.P.) Versus RESPONDENTS . 1. The State ofMadhya radesh through The Secretary, Higher Education, Vallabh Bhavan, M antralaya Bhopal . APPLICATION UNDER sEcmaN 19 OF THE AmIMSTRATIVE TRIBUNALS ACT 1985 1. Particulaxg of the Petitioner 3 As mentioned in Cause Title. 2. Particulars of the Respondents : As mentioned in Cause Title 3. Particulars of the order impugned against which algglication is made : (1) order No. F.1/17/38-1/99 (291) (11) n‘ated : 25th January 2000 (iii) Passed by z Respondent/The Secretary Higher Educ at ion. The matter relates to ,pranotion. Vide order dated 8.12.1998. of the State Governnent. as-many-a:j 17 Principals of Degree College were prqnoted on the post of Principal Post Degree College on adhoc basis. Ira-pursuant to the- order as referred above, the Petitioner joined his servi- ;‘ ces in the P.G.College. Vide order dated 17th December 1998, modification was done in the order dated 8.12.98 with regard to posting of the Petitioner. The Petitioner by this modified order was pasted in the Gaverment P.G.College mbikapfxr. The Peti t1 oner joined as *Principal P.G .u Coll age Anbikapur and since then he is discharging his duties as Principal P.G. College. Vide order dated 25th JamarykzOOO the State Government has cancelled the earlier order of pranotion dated ‘ .12.98 with a direction to post the PetitiOner in the Governnent Degree College Ramanujgana District Surguja. The persons pronoted on adhoc basis vide order dated 8 12.98 still have been retained on the saidpost except the Petitioner and 8 other persons as shown in the order dated 25th January 2000. The order under challenge has been passed in arbitrary (iv) Subject 1n brief : ' I l v > Late Shri Akhil Chandra Lodh, Principal Goverment ( ‘ HW,WW‘W amm Mc32}$7%;m m mmmvfga. WW13WWA $a¥kmanéa SB: Hon’ble Shri Manindra M01 12.03.2010 When the matter was calh petitioner and the matter was pz none appears for the petitioner. Shri Chandresh Shrivastav The petition is therefore dis tan Shrivastava J. 3d for hearing, none appeared for the ‘Lssed over. Even in the second round, a, Panel Lawyer for the State. missed for want of prosecution. J Sd/— Manindra Mohan Shrivastava ,, 7, V Judge w