1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11344 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 24524 OF 2002 The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant VERSUS Premsing s/o Shamsing Rajput & ors. ...Respondents W I T H CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11347 OF 2008 IN F.A.ST. NO.24529 OF 2002 ----- Shri S.K.Tambe, A.G.P. for the applicants/State in both the applications. In C.A. No. 11344 of 2008 application dismissed against respondent no.1 and respondent nos. 2 and 3 served-absent In C.A. No. 11347 of 2008 application dismissed against respondent nos. 1 and 2 and respondent no.3 served-absent ----- CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. DATED : 14th September, 2010 PER COURT : - 1 Heard learned counsel for the applicants. 2 2 These are applications preferred by the applicants for condonation of delay of 26 days in filing the accompanying First Appeals. 3 For the reasons stated in the applications, it appears that the applicants have explained the delay satisfactorily. Moreover, it also appears that the said delay is not willful, deliberate or intentional and certainly it is not inordinate, and hence, same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 4 In the result, present applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B' thereof and delay of 26 days caused in filing both the accompanying First Appeals stands condoned and said appeals be registered and numbered and present applications are disposed of accordingly. [SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.] dbm/ca11344.08 3