dgm gm gm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2332 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.2332 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.2332 OF 2008 Ashwin Bansi Sapkale Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra Respondent. Mrs.V.R.Raje for the petitioner. Mrs.P.H.Kantharia, APP for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : BILAL NAZKI & : BILAL NAZKI & : BILAL NAZKI & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 19th January, 2009. : 19th January, 2009. : 19th January, 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. The petitioner had asked for furlough which has been rejected on the ground that the witness in the case who appeared against him may be harmed by the petitioner. We do not find any ground to be sustainable. But we have found from the counter affidavit that the prisoner was granted furlough for 14 days on 13.02.2007 and he overstayed for a period of 34 days. Inspite of this, he was granted again parole on 3.7.2007 and was released on parole and overstayed for 105 days. Looking to the conduct of the petitioner, we do not think that he deserves to be granted parole leave. However, after six months from today, if the petitioner makes an application that may be considered by the respondents in accordance with law. ( 2 ) 2. The petition is accordingly dismissed. (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) (BILAL (BILAL (BILAL NAZKI, J.) NAZKI, J.) NAZKI, J.)