IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1137 of 2007 SK.MUSWA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 29.7.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned judgment and order dated 18.6.2007 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. III, Katihar in Criminal Appeal No. 49 of 2002 as well as judgment dated 9.9.2002 passed in G. R. No. 1282 of 1987, Trial No. 13 of 2002 by SDJM, Katihar. It appears that lower Court convicted the opposite parties under Sections 323 and 342 of the I.P.C.. However, lower appellate Court set aside the conviction and acquitted the opposite parties from the charges leveled against them. On perusal of the judgment of the appellate Court, it appears that appellate Court has thoroughly discussed each and every material available on record as well as the evidence of the prosecution and has rightly come to the conclusion that the prosecution is not able to prove the case beyond all reasonable doubt in this regard. It further appears that both the parties are inimical to each other and there are several cases against each other. In this regard paragraph 4 and 6 of the judgment is important. In paragraph 6 of the judgment the lacunae of the prosecution case has been fully discussed. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances, I 2 am not inclined to interfere in the impugned order of acquittal dated 18.6.2007 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. III, Katihar in Criminal Appeal No. 49 of 2002. Accordingly, this Cr. Revision is dismissed at the admission stage itself. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)