COCP NO. 1011 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. DATE OF DECISION: 7.9. 2011 Subhash Chander and others ...Petitioners VERSUS Ms.Jyoti Arora …Respondent CORAM HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI PRESENT: Mr.Ramesh Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Mohnish Sharma, Advocate for Mr.Narender Hooda, Advocate for respondents Permod Kohli, J. (Oral) Reply has been filed. Admittedly, the petitioners stand appointed pursuant to the judgment dated 3.12.2008. The only grouse of the petitioners is regarding consequential benefits, except the back-wages. The respondents have placed on record Annexure R-3 whereby pay of the petitioners has also been fixed. It is made clear that the seniority will also be determined accordingly. In this view of the matter, no further directions are required. Learned counsel for the petitioners, however, submits that the petitioners are also entitled to the benefit of the ACP. The petitioners are at liberty to make appropriate representation in respect of ACP which shall be considered by the respondents in accordance with law. This petition is COCP NO. 1011 of 2011 2 rendered infructuous. Dismissed as such. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 7.9.2011 MFK CWP No.10585 of 2010 3