IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25880 of 2010 RAJU CHAUDHARY @ RAJU KUMAR CHOUDHARY, SON OF SRI DASRATH CHOUDHARY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-JHANA CHOWK, HARIPUR, P.S.-NAGAR, DISTRICT-VAISHALI. …..Petitioner. Versus THE SATTE OF BIHAR …..Opposite Party. For the Petitioner : Mrs. Babita Kumari, Advocate For the State : APP. ----------- 05/ 18.03.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State and learned Counsel for the informant. The petitioner is accused of the case which has been registered under Sections 302/379/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Altogether five persons Aenamul Miyan, Numan Miyan, Tajju Miyan, Niyaul @ Shibu and Fauji are named. Besides them five more persons have committed the offence. Submission is that the petitioner’s name has come on the basis of confession of co-accused. Prayer for bail has been opposed by learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the informant who has submitted that the petitioner was identified in the test 2 identification parade. The case diary has come and the learned APP has submitted that the petitioner has not ever put on test identification parade and identified. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate/court concerned, Patna City in connection with Khajekalan P.S. Case No. 228 of 2009. kksinha/- (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)