IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL (C) No? ^ /S9e8-S-^ APPELLANT Rajiv Meshram @ Raju S/o. Shri V1'' Gendlal Meshram Aged about - 0^). 38years, R/o. - Shanti Nagar, Ward 0^). 38years, R/o. - Shanti Nagar, '"2-1 ~\t^ l?,\i>ftt<:' no-4, Rajnandgaon.District .\p) Rajnandgaon (C.G.) (Claimant) VERSUS RE'SPONDENTS /' 1) Pusauram S/o. Shri Dhanshram, R/o. Aged-65 years, Nutan Chowk,Sahu Para,Bhilai-3 Tahsil & District- Durg (C.G.) -—(Owner), 2) if Kartikram Kunjam S/o.- Sonauram Kunjam R/o- Kektitola, Tehsil- Chowki.District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) (Driver) Manager, United Insurance Company Ltd., Tara Complex, G.E.Road, District- Bhilai Branch- Kamptee line, District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.)—— (Insurer) APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OFJ\;10TOR VEHICLE ACT. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI PRASHANT KUWfiK MISHRA. J. M.A.fONo. 378 of 2009 APPELLANT Rajiv Meshram @ Raju. Versus RESPONDENTS Pusauram and others. Shri Basant Dewangan, counsel for appellant. ORAL ORDER (20/06/2011) Following oral order of the Court was passed by Prashant Kumar Mishra. J. Heard. (2) This is an appeal filed by the injured for enhancement of the amount ofcompensation. (3) The appellant received injury on his head in an accident which took place on 09/09/2005 involving Jeep bearing No. C.G.08 T 0119 which was dashed by another Jeep bearing No. C.G.07 ZD 9387. The appellant claimed total compensation of Rs.27,500/-, however the Tribunal has awarded compensation of Rs.2,000/-. (4) The appellant is a Riksha Puller. tn para 22 of the award it has been found that the appellant received injuries on his head, however the injury was simple in nature as no fracture was detected on his head or on any part of the body. tn view of the above the Tribunal, while observing that the appellant has failed to submit any bill or receipt for the expenditure incurred in treatment, a sum of Rs.2000/- has been granted as compensation for the loss suffered by him during the period which he might not have been able to engage himself in his vocation on account of the simple injury caused on his head. s^- (5) ThisCourt does not find any illegality and consequently no scope for enhancement in the award amount is made out. (6) The appeal being devoid of any substance is hereby dismissed. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge V-