^r^ ^' ^'"'^ it,...^l^^% S ^^3^' i I ^.^ ^'v\ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR CONTEMPT CASE fC) N0.148/2009 PETITIONERS L- RESPONDENT 1. Nathuram Sharma, S/o fc.ate Shn Jairam Prasad Sharma, aged about 53 years, R/o Village- Tarri Post-Patewa, Via- Rajim, Tah. Abhanpur. Distt. Raipur (C.G.). 2. Beni Prasad Harbansh, S/o Sadaram Harbansh, aged about 58 years, Assistant Teacher, R/o Vjllage- Bendri, P.0.- Bendri, Primary School Bendri, Abhanpur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3. Shivcharan Harbansh, S/o Late Jailal Harbansh, aged about 53 years, R/o Village- Tarla, P.0. Bhueeka, Distt, Raipur (C.G.). 4. Ramkaran Harbansh, S/o Pyarelal Harbansh, aged about 52 year§, R/o Village & P.0. Salouni, Dist. Rajpur (C.G.). 5. Manav Das Tandan, S/o Shri Ghursen Das Tandan, aged about 62 years, Retired Assistant Teacher, R/o Viltage Patnakapa, Post, Kheda Tahsit- Nawagarh, Dist. Durg (C.G.) 6. Balmukund Yadu, S/o Shri Narayan Prasad Yadu, aged about 53 years, Assistant Teacher Primary School Mohandi, R/o Post-Khorpa, Block" Abhanpur, Distt. Rajpur (C.G.) 7. Ishwar Das Gandaire, S/o Shri Bhandari Das, Gandaire, aged about 56 years, Upper Division Teachers, R/o Qovt. Middle Schooj, Murta, Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS Shri Bibiyan Tirkey Under Secretary. State of Chhattisgarh, School EducatiQn Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G^ CONTEMPT CASE fC) UNDERARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READWITH SECTION 12 OF THECONTEMPfOP COURTS ACf. Appearance: Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petifioners. ^,,^^25^ ,/^ • . '"^ ff' .y^ .... "^ -^ CONTEMPT CASE (a NQ. 148/2009 s SUNIL KUMAR SINHAJ. Heard. ORALORDER (30.06.2011) The matter is listed in defautt as the proce^ f&e s®directed by this Court has not been paid. s Mr. Somkant Verma, leamed counsel for the petitionere, submits that after filing of ttie contempt petition, some circulars have been issued.on which the petitioner,smay get the benefite. He may be permitted to wlhdraw this contempt petition with Itberty to fite another contempt petitton, IF future developmentso warrants. Permission granted. Accordingly, the eontempt petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioners. ____— Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge f" ! \ '