1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10123 OF 2009 1.Vishal Shekhar Poonja and ors .. Petitioners Vs 1.Kalyan-Dombivli Municipal Corporation and ors .. Respondents Mr.S.P.Kanuga and Mr.H.P.Vyas for the petitioners. Mr. A.S.Rao, AGP, for Respondent nos 1 and 2. Mr R.M.Patne, AGP, for respondent no.3.. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 03/12/2009 PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This petition challenges the order dated 26.11.2009 passed by respondent no.2. Admittedly, this order is appealable. As a matter of fact, the petitioners have filed appeal against the said order and it is pending before respondent no.3. In view thereof, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition and the appropriate course would be to direct respondent no.3 to deal with the appeal in accordance with law. Hence, the following order. (i) Respondent no.3 shall deal with the appeal filed by the petitioners against the order dated 26.11.2009 passed by T 2 respondent no.2 as expediti8ously as possible and preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Respondent no.3 shall deal with the appeal on merits in accordance with law. Pending hearing and final disposal of the appeal, the interim order, that was passed by this court on 16.10.09 in Writ Petition no. 892 of 2009, shall remain operative. (ii)The petitioners are directed to produce a copy of this order before respondent no.3 within a period of ten days from today. (iii) With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)