IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 5793 of 2002 Between: Maduri Wines, Licence No. 356/2000/C3, Rep. by its Rapaka Venkanna, S/o.Balaiah, R/o.Tirumulagiri (V&M), Nalgonda District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise, Government of A.P., Nampally, Station Road, Hyderabad. 2 The Prohibition & Excise Superintendent, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of the Writ of MANDAMUS, directing the respondents to consider the representation dt.22-3-2002 to renew the present excise year from 1-4-2002 to 31.3.2003 in respect of IL-24 licence bearing No. 27/2000/C dt.17/5/2000 valid up to 31.3.2002 of M/s Madhuri Wines, Tirumulgiri (V & M), Nalogonda District, by declaring inaction fo the respondents in not considering the representation dt.22-3-2002 as illegal and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.B.SAI RAM GOUD Counsel for Respondent No.1 & 2: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court made the following : ORDER: Sri B. Sai Ram Goud, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause of action in this writ petition does not survive, and the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording his submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _____________________ V.V.S. RAO, J. 1st July, 2005 Js To 1 Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise, Government of A.P., Nampally, Station Road, Hyderabad. 2 The Prohibition & Excise Superintendent, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. 3 Two CCs to G.P. for Prohibition and Excise, High Court buildings, Hyderabad. 4 2 CD copies.