1 Amk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 761 OF 2003 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1141 OF 2003 Sharukh Behram Irani .. Appellant Vs. Union of India & Ors. .. Respondents Appellant in person is absent. Mr. S.R. Rajguru for the respondent No.1. CORAM : J. H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 9th October, 2009. P.C. 01. The appellant in person was not present earlier. As per office order, notice was served on him. However, in spite of service of notice, he did not remain present. Today also he is not present. The appeal is filed against the concurrent finding of the Courts below holding that the appellant had not complied with the terms and conditions and had not renewed the contract of the lease of the land and therefore the Estate Officer of the Cantonment had passed an order and possession of the property was taken under the Public Premises Act. 02. Therefore, the appeal stands dismissed in default. 03. As the appeal itself is dismissed, Civil Application No. 1141 of 2003 does not survive and stands of accordingly. (J. H. BHATIA, J.)