'5^F ^PT^F!, i^^FI^,: '^T^^ ^PS^ Ws*m«tf i"^'^@0' ^Ei^:'^^- (<p|y^l)- 3?F^i^r R^ieh ^T^T ^I^i ^Il^ ^RTO^ TrftcT 3^ir ^T^f^ TP^ ^ fe^'^^n '^^tj^a^T fSinale Bench; Hon'ble Mr W.P. [s] (Petition U/A 226 of| PETITEONER Rbm Vs RESPONbENTS Present: AAr. Somkant Verma, Advocate for th| Mr. A. Sao, Govt. Advocate for the S| 06.01.2009 Heard. The petitioner by this petilji the date of passing 6f B. Ed. pay as per circular of Annexure P-{ Learned counsel for the pe^ matterbunch of petitions were dated 15.12.2006 passed in W.P. Justice bhirendra Mishra) Slo. 2/2009 Constitution of Zndia) , Jain, Aged about 60 years, S/o Late I Singh Jcun, 5ovt. Middle School/ *a, Block-Narharpur, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) Bharat Shri Fu| Dumarpaf 1. Statej 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh Through Secr4tary, Tribal Welfare C)epartment <& Educ4tion bepartment, b.K.S. Bhawan, bistt. - Raiput'(C.(5.) 2. Assist-ant CommissEoner, Trjbal Welfare bepaiftment, Kanker, Distt. Kanker (C6) 3. Block| Education Officer, Block Narharpur, bisttj Kanker (C.G.) 4. Trea^ury Account and Pension, Kanker, Distt. Kank^r (C.G.) ^ petitioner. ate. ion is claiming two increments from exalnination with all arrears and to fix ^l dated 24.12.1998 litioncrs submits that in the similar jdecided by this Court vide order |No.4130/05 whereby the petitions ::^f^^^ .^.t. '^ -i i ,1:^.1^-,. --•fastl-HC-78 ~ 3?T^T^RY^te ?i^T^n^?^:rN? 'y^ '-^!4i^, ''^ft^Fr^, 'f^TTRy ^TO^ST^tiR^ •^200 -^T^'^RT^ (^f^^) 'P^'R ^W^ ^^ z ^Rfep^T 'W^ff ^f fe^ T^^K ; ^ -^ ^tfTO ^I^T were disposed of in terms of dehision of this Court in the matter of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj V^. another reported in 2006 (11) /^PJR-CG 96, subject to verification of the fact as to whether th| B.T.I./ b.Ed. certificates at thei! 24.12.1998 and 1.3.1998 and fu^ if the petitioner files represen parties, this petition is disposecjl make representation before . Municipal Corporation, burg and ^ petitioners have acquired B.Ed./ own expenses as per circular dated r-ther whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. On the other hand, iearnetd counsel for the State submits that ation in this regard, the same shall be decided in the light of jud^ment delivered in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj's case. In view of the above subimissions of learned counsel for the of withliberty to the petitioner to respondent No.l raising all his grievances raised in this petiti^n and on such representation being made, respondent No.l shall decjde the same expeditiously in light of the Yashwant Kumar Bhardwaj'^ case, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of r^ceipt of copy of representation along with certified copy of this orde|l. Certified copyas per rul^. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ^