IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7739 of 2003 YOGENDRA SINGH Versus BIHAR RAJYA SAHKARI BHUMI VIKAS BANK & ORS ----------- 07/ 09-09-2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for Bank. From the supplementary affidavit filed by the petitioner on 27.9.2005, it appears that substantial payments have been released to the petitioner by the respondents. However, he has raised grievance with regard to the few items i.e.(i) he has raised grievance that against the loan of Rs.30,000/- one extra installment has been deducted from his salary to the tune of Rs.1,062/-, (ii) he has claimed the amount of security deposit of Rs.2,500 with interest, (iii) he has claimed share money of the bank of Rs.3800/-with interest till the date of payment and (iv) he has claimed arrears of salary from November, 2000 to 21.5.2001, on which date pursuant to the order of this Court petitioner as well as others were reinstated as order of this Court was to treat the petitioner in service with all consequential benefits, as a result of 2 quashing of the termination order. Learned counsel for the respondent- Bank submits that the Bank is ready to consider the claims of the petitioner as mentioned above and pass appropriate orders for payment if the amount is found due with statutory interest as applicable. So far as arrears of salary for the period November, 2000 to 21.5.2001 is concerned, learned counsel for the Bank submits that the same shall be paid to the petitioner along with other employees, who were also terminated and thereafter reinstated pursuant to the order of this Court. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Bank, this writ application is disposed of with a direction to the Bank authorities to act accordingly. A.H./ ( J. N. Singh , J. )