IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 978 OF 2011 Pritpal Singh ……..Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …Respondents. Present : Shri Gopal K. Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri S.S. Adhikari, AGA, present for the State. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard. 2. By means of this writ petition, moved under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought quashing of the First Information Report dated 6.11.2011 registered as FIR No. 520 of 2011 relating to offences punishable under Section 7 of the Cinematography Act, 1952, Police Station Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner pleaded that the petitioner has no connection with theater Shyam Talkies, Rudrapur, in which blue / obscene film is said to have been exhibited. 4. However, the factual pleas cannot be examined by this Court at this stage. 5. Therefore, without expressing any opinion as to final merits in the matter, the writ petition is summarily dismissed with the observation that if petitioner Pritpal Singh surrenders before the court concerned, his bail application shall be heard and disposed of without unreasonable delay. (Stay Application No. 11715 of 2011 stands disposed of) (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 11.11.2011 Rathour