IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3864 of 2009 KAMESHWAR YADAV, son of Late Sukhdeo Yadav, resident of village Haripur, Police Station- Kunauli, District Supaul Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna 2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna 3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Koshi, Bihar, Patna 4. The District Magistrate-cum- District Officer, Supaul 5. The Superintendent of Police, Supaul, District Supaul 6. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Supaul, District Supaul 7. The Station House Officer of Kunauli Police Station, Supaul ----------- For the Petitioner :M/s Amrit Abhijeet, Upendra Kumar & Manoj Kumar Gupta, Advocates For the State :Mr. S.C.10 02/ 07.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner, who at the relevant time served as Chaukidar with the Kunauli Police Station in the district of Supaul, is aggrieved by the suspension order which is dated 23.7.2008 issued by the Superintendent of Police, Supaul as the petitioner was convicted in connection with a trial for the offence under Section 307 and other allied Sections of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to undergo R.I. for four years and taken in custody to serve the sentence on 21.4.2008, the date with effect from which he has been suspended under the impugned order dated 23.7.2008, Annexure-2 to this application. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that against his conviction, he has filed appeal and during the pendency of the appeal, his sentence has been suspended and he has been released on bail. It is further submitted on behalf of the 2 petitioner that as the petitioner has been released on bail, he submitted his joining, which is not being accepted, although his sentence has been suspended and the authorities should accept his joining. For acceptance of his joining, he has filed representation, which is dated 4.10.2008 and is addressed to the Superintendent of Police, Supaul and is contained in Annexure-4 to this application. 4. Let the Superintendent of Police, Supaul, Respondent no.5 consider the representation dated 4.10.2008, Annexure-4 and pass appropriate speaking order in accordance with law, as early as possible, in any case within one month from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order. 5. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Arjun/ ( V.N. Sinha, J.)