IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6988 of 2007 DR.AMAL KUMAR GHOSH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.545 of 2008 DR.GHULAM MUZTABA ANSARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.11163 of 2008 RAM CHANDRA PRASAD SINGH Versus BABA SAHEB B.R.AMBEDKAR BIH.U& With CWJC No.12573 of 2008 KAMLA KANODIA Versus THE B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY &OR With CWJC No.13507 of 2008 AKHILESHWAR THAKUR Versus THE B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY &OR with CWJC No.14571 of 2008 DR.KEDAR NATH SAH Versus B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY & ORS With CWJC No.14584 of 2008 SHAMBHU NATH SINGH Versus B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY & ORS With CWJC No.14698 of 2008 DR.RAM ASHISH SINGH Versus B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY & ORS With CWJC No.15241 of 2008 JITENDRA KUMAR VERMA Versus THE B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY &OR With CWJC No.15251 of 2008 DEV KRISHNA DAS Versus TH B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY &ORS With CWJC No.15417 of 2008 GOUREE SHANKAR SINGH Versus THE B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY &OR With CWJC No.15430 of 2008 PARMANAND SINGH Versus THE B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY &OR With CWJC No.15466 of 2008 CHANDRA MOHAN DAS Versus THE B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY &OR With CWJC No.15508 of 2008 DR.ASHOK KUMAR JHA Versus THE B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY &OR With CWJC No.8083 of 2009 MD.QUASIM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ------ 2. 08.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and the respondent- University. All the writ applications are related to common issue with regard to the payment of retrial dues and other dues, as such, they have been heard together and disposed of by the common order. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that upon superannuation, they are entitled to receive all the retiral dues, however, the same has not been paid as yet. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent – University submits that in case petitioners file separate representation stating the details of their pending claims, the same would be considered as per law without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for expeditious disposal of their pending claims, petitioners propose to file a separate representation before the respondent – Vice chancellor of the University enclosing the copy of the relevant documents if any, in support of such claim along with certified copy of the present order within a period of eight weeks from today. In case such representations are filed, the Vice- Chancellor of the respondent – University shall get each of the claims raised by the petitioners in their representation examined in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the pending claims of the petitioners could be paid without delay along with a forwarding letter indicating the details of payment item wise. However if any of the claims upon consideration are found not admissible, the same shall be communicated to the concerned petitioners with reasons thereof. It is further submitted that upon receipt of the payments if any, it will be open for the petitioners to bring it to the notice of the Vice Chancellor of the respondent University about short payment if any, with supporting material justifying the claim. All the above writ applications are disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)