..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.801 OF 2007 1. Shri Raju Bansi Pawar, 2. Shri Bapu Bansi Pawar, 3. Shri Nandu Bandu Pawar, 4. Shri Somnath Bandu Pawar, 5. Sau Indrabai w/o Bandu Pawar, 6. Sau Rekhabai Raju Pawar, 7. Sau Shantabai w/o Somnath Pawar, 8. Sau Latabai w/o Vijay Pawar, 9. Shri Bansi Bandu Pawar, 10.Shri Vijay Bandu Pawar, 11.Shri Baba Bansi Pawar, 12.Shri Taba Ananda Sonawane, 13.Shri Munna Vijay Pawar, 14.Shri Bandu Ramchandra Pawar, 15.Shri Kisan Trambak Pawar, 16.Miss.Dagabai Vijay Pawar & 17.Miss.Taibai Ananda Sonawane. ...Applicants. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Miss.P.P.Tendulkar, Adv. for Applicants. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP, for State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 21st March, 2007. DATED : 21st March, 2007. DATED : 21st March, 2007. P.C.: . Leave to amend. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. 2. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicants and the learned APP for the State. ..(2).. 3. The applicants who are original accused are seeking bail in C.R No.I-2 of 2007 of Yeola Police Station. The said C.R. is mainly under Section 307 of IPC. 4. The learned Advocate for the applicants has submitted that applicant Nos.5,6,7,8,16 & 17 are ladies. She has submitted that applicant No.5 is 70 years old and applicant Nos.6 to 8 are having young children and as far as applicant Nos.16 & 17 are concerned they are young girls of 18 years. Hence, the learned Advocate for the applicants has prayed that applicant Nos.5,6,7,8, 16 & 17 may be granted bail. 5. As far as applicant No.14 is concerned, the learned APP, on instructions, has submitted that applicant No.14 Bandu Ramchandra Pawar is dead. In view of this statement, the application for grant of bail in respect of applicant No.14 has become infructuous. 6. Looking to fact that applicant Nos.5,6,7,8,16 & 17 are ladies and the facts ..(3).. mentioned above, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant Nos.5,6,7,8,16 & 17 only. 7. The applicant No.5 Sau Indrabai w/o Bandu Pawar, applicant No.6 Sau Rekhabai Raju Pawar, applicant No.7 Sau Shantabai w/o Somnath Pawar, applicant No.8 Sau Latabai w/o Vijay Pawar, applicant No.16 Miss.Dagabai Vijay Pawar & applicant No.17 Miss.Taibai Ananda Sonawane to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. 8. As far as other applicants are concerned, liberty is granted to them to prefer a fresh application for bail after some time. 9. Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)