IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2255 of 2004. Jagdish Prasad son of late Shri Narain Sharma VERSUS The Additional District Judge No.2, Jaipur District Jaipur & Others Date Of Order ::: 23/04/2008. Hon'ble Mr. Narendra Kumar Jain J. Mr. Rakesh Kumar and Mr. Rajendra Raghava, Counsel for the Petitioner None present for the respondents By the Court: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The plaintiff/petitioner instituted a suit for permanent injunction in respect of disputed way. An application for temporary injunction was also filed, which was allowed by the trial Court vide its order dated 07.08.1995, but on an appeal, filed by the defendants, the Appellate Court set aside the order passed by the trial Court vide its order dated 25.01.2003. Being aggrieved with the same, the plaintiff has preferred this writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the order passed by the learned trial Court was a reasoned order, and the merits of the case were also examined, but the Appellate Court without considering the reasons assigned by the learned trial Court for granting temporary injunction wrongly set aside the order passed by the trial Court, therefore, the order of the Appellate Court may be set aside, and the order of the trial Court be restored, during the pendency of the suit. A notice to show cause was given to the respondents of this writ petition on 07.07.2004, and an order of status-quo was also passed and the said order is still continuing. The respondents are not present, in-spite service of notice. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner in the light of the reasons assigned by the Appellate Court as well as trial Court, and after considering the same I find this case to be fit one, wherein the order passed by this Court on 07.07.2004 maintaining status-quo in respect of disputed way be continued during the pendency of the suit. Consequently, the writ petition is allowed. The order passed by the Appellate Court is set aside, and it is directed that both the parties shall maintain the status-quo in respect of disputed way during the pendency of the suit before the trial Court. The cost is made easy. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. ashok/