IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 2815 of 2010 Decided on 19.6.2010 Ranjit Singh ….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the Petitioner: Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate. For Respondents Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Petitioner is aggrieved since he is disturbed within two months from his transfer from Mandi to Tauni Devi. 2. Learned Senior Additional Advocate General and the learned counsel for the private respondent submit that the present transfer from Tauni Devi to Hamirpur is not a transfer, but it is an adjustment and the distance between Tauni Devi to Hamirpur is 15 k.m. 3. According to the petitioner, the private respondent had already been transferred from Tauni Devi to Hamirpur and without any justifiable reason, he got re-transferred to Tauni Devi and in the process, the petitioner has been harassed within two months of his transfer from Mandi to Tauni Devi. 4. It is submitted that the 4th respondent had worked at Tauni Devi for more than 14 years. The 4th respondent seriously disputes all these submissions. Be that, as it may. Since the petitioner and the 4th respondent have rival submissions, we are of the view that it will be appropriate that the first respondent looks into the matter. The petitioner and the 4th respondent will submit their respective submissions before the first respondent within two weeks from today, in which case the first respondent will look into the matter and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law and justice, adverting to the submissions made in the representations, within another two weeks. Interim order passed by this court will continue for the said period. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. June 19, 2010(K/HL) ( Justice Kuldip Singh ), Judge