IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 7TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 16TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 27735 of 2010(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.OMANA AMMA,W/O.LATE V.APPU KURUP (PRE-1986 COMBINED SERVICES PENSIONER)PUTHAN PURAYIL HOUSE, P.O.CHAMPAD, (VIA)THALASSERY KANNUR DISTRICT,KERALA-670694(REPRESENTED BY THE P.O.A.HOLDER P.A.SADASIVAN,S/O.LATE V.APPU KURUP R/PUTHAN PURAYIL(H)P.O.CHAMPAD(VIA)TALASSERY,KANNU BY ADV. P.A.SADASIVAN(PARTY-IN-PERSON) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. CHIEF POST MASTER GENERAL, TAMINADU POSTAL CIRCLE, CHENNAI-600002 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL (POSTS) DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DAK BHAVAN, NEW DELHI-110001 3. DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNTS (POSTAL) TAMILNADU POSTAL CIRCLE,CHENNAI-600008 4. SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POST OFFICES CHENNAI CITY CNETRAL DIVISION, CHENNAI-600017 5. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, DEPARTMENT OF PENSION AND PENSIONERS WELFARE, MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS, LOK NAYAK BHAVAN, NEW DELHI-110003 SRI. T.P.M. IBRAHIM KHAN, ASST. SOLICITOR GENERAL. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 27735 of 2010 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 7th day of September, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a widow, whose husband was an employee of the Postal Department. In this writ petition filed through the power of attorney holder of the petitioner, she seeks revision of pension/family pension consequent to retrospective revision of pay in terms of O.M. No. 3/12/81-PII dated 22.1.1991 of the Department of Personnel & Training, Government of India. 2. I have heard the power of attorney holder of the petitioner. 3. Admittedly, the petitioner had filed several O.As and writ petitions before the Central Administrative Tribunal and this Court for the same relief. All of them have been dismissed. The petitioner again filed W.P(C) No. 7482/2010, in which this Court, by Ext. P8 judgment, directed consideration of the claim of the petitioner. By Ext. P11 order, the petitioner's claim has again been rejected, noting that for the same reliefs the petitioner had filed O.A.Nos. 836/2003 and 834/2006 before the CAT, which were dismissed and the petitioner had filed several writ petitions also before this Court , which were also dismissed. I am of opinion that for the same reliefs, the petitioner cannot go on filing O.As and writ petitions again and again. If at all, the petitioner's remedy lies in challenging those orders appropriately which the petitioner has not chosen to do. In the above circumstances, I do not find any merit in the writ petition and accordingly the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.