IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 30TH OCTOBER 2009 / 8TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 30926 of 2009(I) -------------------------- PETITIONERS:- ----------------- 1. G. VARGHESE, SENIOR ASSISTANT, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ELECTRICAL DIVISION, CHATHANNOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. (TRANSFERRED TO ELECTRICAL CIRCLE, TIRUR) 2. RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI K. SENIOR ASSISTANT, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ELECTRICAL SECTION, KANNANALLOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. (TRANSFERRED TO ELECTRICAL CIRCLE, TIRUR) 3. JACOB JOHN, SENIOR ASSISTANT, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ELECTRICAL DIVISION, CHATHANNOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. (TRANSFERRED TO ELECTRICAL CIRCLE, TIRUR) 4. SAJEEV G., SENIOR ASSISTANT, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ELECTRICAL DIVISION, CHATHANNOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. (TRANSFERRED TO ELECTRICAL CIRCLE, TIRUR) 5. RAJ KUMAR.K. SENIOR ASSISTANT, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ELECTRICAL DIVISION, CHATHANNOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. (TRANSFERRED TO ELECTRICAL CIRCLE, TIRUR) BY ADV. MR. D.KISHORE RESPONDENTS:- ------------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (HRM), KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ELECTRICAL CIRCLE, KOLLAM. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ELECTRICAL DIVISION, CHATHANOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. ADV. MR. K.S. ANIL, SC., KSEB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ........................................... W.P.(C)NO.30926 OF 2009-I ............................................. Dated this the 30th day of October, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioners are Senior Assistants in the different offices under the Electrical Circle, Kollam. By Ext.P2 order dated 7.5.2009 all of them have been transfered to Tirur. It is this transfer which is under challenge in this writ petition. 2. Exts.P5 to P9 also show that the petitioners have been relieved from the present office where they were working. If that be so, this Court will not be justified in passing any interim order in the matter. 3. According to the petitioners, Exts.P3, P4 and P10 to P13 are the representations filed before the 2nd respondent objecting to their transfer in which they have already highlighted their grievances against the transfer. Now that these representations are pending. It is up to the authority concerned to consider these representations and pass orders thereon. In view of the above, I dispose of this writ petition directing the 2nd respondent to consider Exts.P3, P4 and P10 : 2 : W.P.(C)NO.30926 OF 2009-I to P13 filed by the petitioners as early as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE cl