1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Eighth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr. Justice S. TAMILVANAN CRL OP(MD) No.14455 of 2011 TAMIL SELVAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED A1 Vs THE STATE REP. BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE TOWN POLICE STATION, ARUPPUKKOTTAI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT CR.NO. 1493 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.MURUGAPPAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAn, Addl. Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/A-1 as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent. 2. The petitioner-A-1 apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 323, 294(b) and 506(i) I.P.C., in Crime No.1493 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police, has come forward with the application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., seeking anticipatory bail. 3. As per the prosecution case on 19.10.2011 at about 10.30 p.m., in a hotel there was a quarrel between the petitioner/A1 and the defacto complainant while purchasing Parotta and other eatables. Even as per the prosecution case, the defacto complainant was attacked only by hand. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person has been arrayed as A1. According to him the petitioner has been falsely implicated though he has nothing to do with the alleged offence. He further submitted that there is no bad antecedents against the petitioner/A1 and the alleged injured was discharged from the hospital since the injury alleged sustained by the defacto complainant was simple in nature. 5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent has not disputed the fact that there is no bad antecedents against the petitioner herein. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that there is no bad antecedents against the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 petitioner, I find it just and reasonable to grant anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner on the following conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest, on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukottai and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously. 7. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stand dismissed. sd/- 08/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARUPPUKOTTAI. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VIRUDHUNAGAR AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE TOWN POLICE STATION, ARUPPUKKOTTAI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. 4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. R.MURUGAPPAN Advocate SR. No.38374 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14455 of 2011 Date :08/11/2011 RJ/10.11.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/