IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 23924 of 1999 Between: K.Nirmala Devi S/o.D.M.L.Paul O/o. R.D.O., Guntur. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Land Revenue A.P Hyderabad. 2 The Collector and Districe Magistrate Guntur. 3 The Registrar, A.P.Administrative Tribunal Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to To issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order or direction, by calling for records relating to the proceedings of the 2nd respondent bearing Rc.No.9325/97-A3, dt.30-10-99 and also the order of the Hon'ble A.P.Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad in O.A.No.6602/99 dated 10-11-1999 and set aside the same with all consequential benefits by holding the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dt.30-10-99, as illegal, unjustify,discriminatory,violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, Rule 4 of A.P.Revenue Subordinate of Services Rules and Rule 6 and 22 of A.P.State and Subordinate of Service Rules and to pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.GOPAL RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU Writ Petition No.23924 of 1999 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Ramulu) This writ petition is filed against the order dated 10-11-1999 passed in O.A.No.6602 of 1999 on the file of Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad. 2. The very O.A. was filed seeking to continue the petitioner – applicant as Deputy Tahsildar as if the impugned orders were not passed. O.A. was disposed of with the following direction: “ In view of the facts and circumstances and taking into consideration the submissions made by both sides, the applicant is directed to file a representation to the Dist. Collector, Guntur, within one weeks from the date of receipt of this order and on such representation being made, the District Collector, Guntur, is directed to examine the same in the light of the proceedings issued in favour of Sri K.Krishna Rao, MRO-II who is now working as Special Dy.Tahsildar, Elections, in proceedings Rc.No.400/99-A4 dated 6-8-1999, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with rules within one month thereafter. OA is disposed of accordingly with the above observations at the admission stage.” Aggrieved thereby, the present writ petition is filed. 3. While admitting the writ petition on 4-1-2000, interim suspension was granted and thereafter, the same was made absolute on13-7-2001. It is brought to the notice of the Court by learned Government Pleader that the petitioner has been appointed as Deputy Tahsildar in the regular cadre during the pendency of the writ petition. However, if for any reason, the petitioner is not considered for the post of Deputy Tahsildar in the regular cadre, she is at liberty to make a representation to the District Collector, Guntur, who shall consider the same and pass appropriate order as per law. 4. The writ petition is accordingly closed. No costs. ___________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J. ___________________ C.V.RAMULU, J. 21-07-2008 bsc