IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.1644 OF 2006 PETITION NO.1644 OF 2006 PETITION NO.1644 OF 2006 Laxmi Prabhakar Patankar...Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors..Respondents Mr. Madhav J. Jamdar, for the Petitioner Mr. G.W. Mattos, AGP for Respondents. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & F.I. REBELLO & F.I. REBELLO & MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE: 27TH JUNE,2006 P.C. . On behalf of the respondents their learned Counsel on taking instructions from the Assistant Estate Manager Mr. Zante makes a statement that the petitioner would be allotted three units of 225 sq.ft in the building known as "Kanchwala Building". The petitioner will have to pay for the area in excess of 235 sq.ft. The three units as far as possible should be together, if not three, two unit should be together. Learned Counsel for the petitioner on taking instructions states that the petitioner will be paying for the balance area which is more than 235 sq.ft. The statement made on behalf of the respondents accepted. The allotment to be done on or before 30th June, 2006. In the event the allotment is not done in terms of the statement recorded today,liberty to the petitioner to apply to this Court. It is made clear that the petitioner would be allotted 235 sq.ft. carpet area free of charge and the petitioner will have to pay the balance as per the Rules in force. With the above observations petition stands disposed of. (F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J). J). J).