IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 2ND MARCH 2009 / 11TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 6580 of 2009(N) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------- R.MASHOOR, SHANI MOTOR DRIVING SCHOOL, VALANJAVAZHY MURIYIL, AMBALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.S.SANAL KUMAR SRI.VGANESH KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MOTOR VEHICLE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, ALAPPUZHA. 5. THE MANAGER, A TO Z MOTOR DRIVING SCHOOL, CHERTHALA. 6. THE MANAGER, KARTHIKA MOTOR DRIVING SCHOOL, CHERTHALA. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 6580 OF 2009 (N) ==================== Dated this the 2nd day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T The complaint of the writ petitioner is that the 4th respondent is admitting applicants for driving test, candidates sponsored by driving schools functioning outside his jurisdiction. This according to the petitioner is in violation of Section 9 of the Motor Vehicles Act read with Rule 24(2) of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules. 2. It is seen from the pleadings that with this complaint, the petitioner has already moved the 4th respondent by filing Ext.P2 and it is complained that orders have not been passed on the application. 3. Taking into account the case of the petitioner, it is directed that if Ext.P2 has been received and is pending, the 4th respondent shall take necessary action. It is made clear that if anything is to be done prejudicial to respondents 4 and 5, such action shall be only with notice to them also. Orders shall be passed as expeditiously as possible. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp