IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9229 of 2008 GEETANJALI KUMARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 5/ 20/03/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State of Bihar. In pursuance of an advertisement inviting applications for appointment on the post of Secretary, Gram Kutchery, the petitioner was an applicant amongst others. She had 72.29% marks while respondent No.7 had 59.5% marks. They were placed at serial Nos.1 and 2 of the panel. Appointment has been given to the respondent No.7. The counseling for appointment took place on 3.10.2007. It is the claim of the petitioner that she was present for the same. The counter affidavit of the official respondents disputes this fact to justify the appointment of respondent No.7. The matter was adjourned at the request of the petitioner to place on record documentary evidence obtained by her of her participation on 3.10.2007. Annexure-13 to the supplementary affidavit filed thereafter only lends credence that she did not participate in counseling on 3.10.2007. On a 2 representation stated to have been submitted by her on 4.10.2007 the District Magistrate has only recorded an opinion that her claim for participation was based thereupon. There is no finding of the District Magistrate on the aspect of her participation as a fact. No relief can be granted in a writ petition on disputed facts. This Court finds no merit in this application. It is accordingly dismissed. KC (Navin Sinha, J.)