IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12790 of 2006 RAJENDRA PRASAD son of late Dasain Yadav, Resident of Mohalla- Kumharar, P.O.-Bahadurpur, P.S.-Agam Kuan, Dist.-Patna, retired from the post of fourth grade employee from College of Commerce Patna, a constituent unit of Magadh University. ……. …….. Petitioner Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya 3.The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya 4.The Principal, College of Commerce, Patna (M.U.) …….. …….Respondents ----------- 14. 21.4.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the respondent-University. Mr. Ram Padarath Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, during the pendency of the writ petition, major portion of the grievance of the petitioner have already been redressed. However, still there are some dues pending with the University. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before the competent authority for remaining grievance. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner has not been refuted by learned counsel for the respondent-University. In view of the stand taken by learned counsel for the petitioner, there is no need to further keep the matter pending before this court. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a representation for remaining grievance before respondent no.3 i.e. the Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya within a period of six weeks from 2 today. If such representation is filed, the respondent no.3 is directed to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of filing of such a representation. If respondent no.3 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for making payment within the aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, the respondent no.3 is directed to pass a speaking order within the aforesaid time. It is made clear that the petitioner shall be entitled to get admissible statutory interest for delayed payment. With above observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)