C.W.P. No. 6340 of 2010 [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 6340 of 2010 Date of Decision: Aug. 2, 2011 Balwinder Singh and another ....................... Petitioners Versus Commissioner Workmen's Compensation cum Assistant Labour Commissioner-4, Ludhiana and others .................................. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Navjeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Lal Gupta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. Mr. P.K.Longia, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3. Mr. D.K.Singal, Advocate for respondent No.4. ... RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 9.3.2009 (Annexure P4) whereby the application of the petitioners for restoration of the claim petition has been dismissed. C.W.P. No. 6340 of 2010 [ 2 ] It is not disputed that the case was fixed for hearing on 16.7.2007 and called for several times but none appeared and the same was dismissed. The applicant filed an application dated 10.9.2007 for restoration which was dismissed in default on 21.7.2008. Thereafter, another application dated 21.7.2008 for restoration of the case was filed. The Commissioner Workmen's Compensation Cum Assistant Labour Commissioner-4 has not accepted the reasons given for non-appearance and dismissed the application on 9.3.2009. In the reply filed on behalf of respondent No.1, it has been mentioned that in the order dated 9.3.2009 attendance of the applicant has been marked. Whereas from the certified copy of the order dated 9.3.2009 (Annexure A1) it is clear that no body was present on 9.3.2009. Writ petition is being allowed and one more opportunity is given to the petitioners to plead their case before the trial Court. The petitioners are directed to appear before the trial Court on 30.8.2011. 2.8.2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Rupi JUDGE