WP(C) 4811/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE I A ANSARI Heard Mr. B. Chakraborty, learned counsel for the writ petitioner, and Ms. P. Ch akraborty, learned Standing counsel, Social Welfare Department, Government of As sam, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 6. The grievance of the writ petitioner is, in brief, thus: The petitioner was applicant for appointment to the post of Anganwadi worker at No. 1 of Shalma ri Anganwadi center under Tingkhong ICDS Project in the district of Dibrugarh. T he petitioner claims that the private respondent, who has been selected as Angan wadi worker, does not belong to the place, where the Anganwadi center is located . As the dispute, raised by the petitioner, is substantially factual in na ture, this Court is of the view that in the facts and circumstance of the presen t case, respondent No. 2, namely, Director, Social Welfare Department, Assam, sh all look into the grievances of the petitioner and make enquiry in this regard a nd, in accordance with the findings of the inquiry, pass appropriate order(s). Whatever decision is reached, in this regard, by the respondent No. 2, or whatev er order is, ultimately, passed by the respondent No. 2, on the petitioner’s gri evances, shall be communicated, in writing, to the petitioner and, if the petiti oner feels aggrieved by the decision(s), which may be reached, or the order(s), which may be passed by the respondent No. 2, the petitioner shall remain at libe rty to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. The whole exercise, so directed, shall be completed within a period of t wo months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by the respondent No. 2. The petitioner may furnish to the respondent No. 2 a certified copy of this order along with a copy of the writ petition and annexure thereto. With the above observations and directions, this writ petition stands di sposed of. Furnish a copy of this order to the learned Standing counsel, Social Wel fare Department.