HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY Civil Revision Petition 241 of 2010 Date: April 8, 2010 Between: Kannamma Devi, D/o.Narayana, aged about 45 years, Occ: housewife, R/o. Nekkonda village and Mandal, Warangal District … Petitioner And Challa Chennakesava Reddy, aged about 55 years, Occ: agriculture, R/o.Nekkonda village and Mandal, Warangal District … Respondent Order: This civil revision petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed aggrieved of the order dated 02-09-2009, passed in I.A.No.117 of 2009 in O.S.No.62 of 2009, by the learned Junior Civil Judge, Narsampet. The petitioner herein is the defendant in the said suit, which is filed for injunction simplicitor. The respondent-plaintiff has filed I.A.No.117 of 2009 in the said suit seeking interim injunction orders. In the said application, he intended to mark documents dated 10-04-1997 and 06-04-2005 as exhibits. At that stage, the petitioner- defendant raised objections with regard to marking of the said documents on the ground that the same are not admissible in evidence, as they are not properly stamped and they were also not registered under the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908. The court below, by the impugned order, recording a finding that as the said documents are being marked in the I.A., the relevancy and admissibility can be relegated at the time of recording evidence while disposing of the suit, overruled the objection raised by the petitioner- defendant. Hence, the present revision petition. I have perused a copy of the order under challenge, passed by the court below. I am of the opinion that the court below has not considered the objections raised by the petitioner-defendant at all. Even when objections are raised at the interlocutory stage with regard to marking of documents, the same are to be considered so as to determine whether they are tenable or not. The court below, merely saying that all these aspects are to be gone into in the suit at the stage of trial, ought not to have overruled the objections raised by the petitioner- defendant with regard to marking of the documents in question. As no finding is recorded by the court below in rejecting the objections of the petitioner-defendant, I deem it appropriate to set aside the order dated 02-09-2009 passed in I.A.No.117 of 2009. Accordingly, the said order is set aside and the court below is hereby directed to consider the objections raised by the petitioner-defendant and pass a reasoned order. The civil revision petition is allowed to the extent indicated above. No order as to costs. _____________________ (R. SUBHASH REDDY, J) April 8, 2010 MRR