... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3977 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3977 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3977 OF 2004 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL NO.80 OF 2005 FIRST APPEAL NO.80 OF 2005 FIRST APPEAL NO.80 OF 2005 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri M.K.Suryawanshi for the Applicants. Shri Rakesh Bhatkar for the Respondent Nos.1 and 6. Shri S.M.Vidyarathi for the Respondent No.9. Smt Arati Barve for the Respondent No.10. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : JANUARY 08, 2007. DATE : JANUARY 08, 2007. DATE : JANUARY 08, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. It is not in dispute that the entire amount due and payable as per the impugned Award has been deposited by the nineth Respondent and the said amount has been withdrawn by the original claimant. The Advocate for the Applicants states that as of today the Respondent No.9 Insurance Company has not initiated any proceedings for recovery of the compensation amount as permitted by the impugned Judgment and Award. In view of this position, this Application need not be entertained with ... 2 ... liberty to the Applicants to apply for the same relief in the event any proceeding is filed by the nineth Respondent. Hence, Application is disposed of with liberty as stated above. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE