WPMS 2739/2001 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. (Delay Cond. Appl. 4252/2010, Restoration Appl. 419/2010) Mr. CK Sharma and Mohd. Matloob, Advocates for the applicant/petitioner. Mr. Prabhakar Joshi, Brief Holder for the State. There is delay of 1008 days in moving the present restoration application, which has been filed seeking recall of the order dated 3.8.2007 passed by this Court whereby the present petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. It reveals from the perusal of record that after the transfer of this case from Allahabad High Court, notice was issued to the applicant/petitioner and the same was personally served upon him on 5.8.2005 and thereafter he also engaged lawyer, viz., Chandramoli Sah, who also moved an application before this Court on 30.8.2005. Power was also filed by Mr. Chanramoli Sah, Azhar Hussain, Manish Joshi, Advocates on behalf of the applicant/petitioner, but non appeared on the date when the case was called out on 3.8.2007. Hence, the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution on 3.8.2007. The aforesaid order dated 3.8.2007 came in the knowledge of the applicant on 2.11.2007 when he received the certified copy of this order and he has filed a photostat copy thereof along with this application. Thereafter an affidavit was sworn by him along with delay condonation application on 20.5.2010, but this application could be filed only on 7.6.2010 before this Court. Even this delay is not explained by showing the sufficient cause. Thus, the applicant had full knowledge of the developments in the case and even then, there is delay of 1008 days in moving present restoration application and this delay has to be explained on day-to-day basis. But as discussed above, the delay has not been explained by showing the sufficient cause. Therefore, I am not inclined to condone the delay. Accordingly, the delay condonation application is dismissed. Consequently, restoration application also stands dismissed. (D.V., J.) 28.6.2010 Prabodh