IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 27748 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: October 5, 2010. Inder Pal Singh @Inda ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Punjab ...... RESPONDENT(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Vivek Salathia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.D.Sachdeva, Addl.A.G., Punjab. Mr. Vikas Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No.44 dated 22.07.2010, under Sections 452/341/323/506/34 IPC, registered at Police Station ‘D’ Division, Amritsar. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that dispute between the parties has since been compromised due to intervention of respectable persons and relatives from both the sides. Complainant-Rajesh CRM No.M-27748 of 2010 Kumar has also come present in the Court today alongwith his counsel admitting the factum of compromise. It has been stated by learned counsel for the State that in view of compromise between the parties, petitioner is not required for any custodial interrogation and that he may be directed to join the investigation. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, in view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of Inder Pal Singh @Inda is accepted. Petitioner is directed to join the investigation and in case he is arrested, he shall be released on bail by the Arresting Officer to his satisfaction subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) October 5, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2