IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWELVETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 11780 of 2004 Between: 1 R.Rama Krishna S/o. R.Chengaiah R/o.Mallamgunta Harijanawada, Tirupathi Rural Mandalam, Chittoor District. 2 R.Chengalrayalu S/o. R.Chengaiah R/o.Mallamgunta Harijanawada, Tirupathi Rural Mandalam, Chittoor District. 3 D.Subramanyam S/o. Gangaiah R/o.Mallamgunta Harijanawada, Tirupathi Rural Mandalam, Chittoor District. 4 D.Chengalrayalu s/o. D.Doraswamy R/o.Mallamgunta Harijanawada, Tirupathi Rural Mandalam, Chittoor District. 5 D.Veeraswamy S/o. Gangaiah R/o.Mallamgunta Harijanawada, Tirupathi Rural Mandalam, Chittoor District. 6 Karavadhi Cheerealaiah s/o. K.Narigaiah r/o. Mallamgunta Harijanawada, Tirupathi Rural Mandalam, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The District Collector, Chittoor Chittoor District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Tirupathi rural Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of 2nd respondent in not disposing of the representation/appeal filed on 23.4.2004 seeking direction to direct the 3rd respondent to give registered sale deed in the names of the petitioners for the schedule property by receiving market value as the appeal was not considered by 2nd respondent is illegal arbitrary and contrary to law and violative of Arts.14, 21 and 300 (A) of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for grant of permanent pattas in the appeal schedule properties. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.JAGADISH CHANDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue and at their request the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. Having regard to the fact that the representation dated 23-4-2004 made by the petitioners is pending before the 2nd respondent, both the counsel agreed for disposal of the writ petition with the following direction. The 2nd respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioners dated 23-4-2004, and pass appropriate orders thereon, expeditioulsy. No costs. ________ 12-7-2004 asp To 1 The District Collector, Chittoor Chittoor District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Tirupathi rural Chittoor District. 4. Two C.Cs. to G.P. for Revenue, High Court Buildings 5. Two C.D. copies