s ' A-51 % 22.09.2011 Present: Mr. Noor Alam, Mr. Robin David and Mr. Dhiraj Phillip, Advocates for the petitioner. +CM No. 17788/2011 (exemption) in CM (M) NO. 1114/2011 * Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM (M) NO. 1114/2011 The order impugned before this court is the order dated 08.08.2011 vide which the application filed by the petitioner in the pending proceedings registered as FIR No. 259/09 under Sections 420, 506, 34 IPG P.S. Krishna Nagar had been dismissed. The contention of the petitioner is that at the time of grant of anticipatory bail to the accused which was passed vide order dated 04.07.2009, the court had noted a fact that the accused-Bhupinder Bhalla had sold the property to the plaintiff in the year 2001; his contention is that the accused-Bhupinder Bhalla is now backing out from this fact; submission being that this amounted to an undertaking which has now been flouted. The petitioner appears to be ignorant of the law and that is why probably, he has filed the application under Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act whch had been rightly dismissed by the trial court. There is no willful disobedience of this order; the order of 04.07.2009 had merely recorded a fact. This petition is clearly an abuse of the process of law. It is Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified dismissed with costs of ? 5,000/- to be deposited with the Delhi High Court Legal Service Committee. Trial Cour|; shall ensure comphance of the order. INDERMEET KAUR, J. SEPTEMBER 22, 2011 rb