IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 3006 of 2008. Decided on: 24.08.2010. __________________________________________________________ Madan Lal. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. N.D. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 2. None for respondents No.3 to 18. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Mr. N.D. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the reply filed by the respondent-State, there is no merit in the petition. Consequently, the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. August 24, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?