IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.DENESAN THURSDAY, THE 18TH JANUARY 2007 / 28TH PAUSHA 1928 WP(C).No. 30154 of 2006(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ SMT.JOHNCY C.V., AGED 38 YEARS, W/O.ALEX, NALPATHAMKULAM HOUSE, SANTHANPARA P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT, NOW WORKING AS CASUAL SWEEPER, VETARINARY DISPENSARY, SANTHANPARA, IDUKKI. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.SABU RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. SECRETARY, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DISTRICT OFFICER, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY DEPARTMENT, THODUPUZHA, MANGATTUKAVALA, IDUKKI. 3. THE DIRECTOR, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY DEPARTMENT, KUDAPPANAKUNNU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. VETERINARY SURGEON, VETERINARY DISPENSARY, SANTHANPARA. BY GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.BIJOY CHANDRAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.K.DENESAN, J. ========================= WP(C).No.30154 OF 2006-M. ========================= Dated this the 18th day of January, 2007. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is working as Casual Sweeper from March, 2001 onwards in the Veterinary Dispensary, Santhanpara. Her service has not been regularised. The 2nd respondent has taken up the matter with the 3rd respondent - Director. For want of regularisation, the petitioner is unable to claim certain service benefits. Hence this writ petition. 2. It is seen from Ext.P5 communication sent by the 2nd respondent to the petitioner on 1-12-2006 that the issue has engaged the attention of the 3rd respondent. The certificate showing the sweeping area and the recommendation of the Commissioner for Handicapped Employees have already been forwarded to the Director with a request to regularise the appointment of the petitioner. 3. In the above view of the matter, it is only proper that respondents 1 & 2 take further action in the matter in terms of the Government order dated 25-11-2005 and pass orders on the request of the petitioner for regularising her service, without further delay, in any event within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of WP(C).No.30154 of 2006. 2 this judgment. 4. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 3rd respondent Director, who shall take immediate steps, as are necessary, after seeking orders from the 1st respondent in terms of Government order dated 25-11-2005. Writ petition is disposed of as above. K.K.DENESAN, JUDGE. kvs/-