IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 4127 of 2005 Between: 1 K. Satyanarayana, S/o. Bgaiah, M/s. Savera Wines, ( L.No. 614), Nagole X road, R.R.District. 2 N. Surender goud, S/o. N. Pentaiah, Sai Wines ( L No.529) Ibrahimpatnam, Vill and Mandal, R.R.District. 3 A. Prameela, W/o. a. Venkataiah, L No. 45, L.B.Nagar R.R.District. 4 A. Srinivas Goud, S/o. Venkaiah, M/s. Savera Wines, Alair, nalgonda District ( L.No.216). 5 R. Chennaiah, S/o. Lakshmaiah, M/s. Pavani Wines, ( L.No.543), Aliya Vill, Anumula Mandal, Nalgonda District. 6 Ch. Chandramouli, S/o. Ramaiah, M/s. Manjeera Wines, ( 350) Aliva Vill, Anumula Mandal, Nalgonda District. 7 K. Srinivas Reddy, S/o. Sathi Reddy, Sri Kaveri Wines, Aliva Vill, Anmula Mandal, Nalgonda District. 8 K. Venkata Ramana Rao, S/o. Venkateswara Rao, M/s. Madhuri Wines, ( L.No.349) Aliva Village, Anumula Mandal, Nalgonda District. 9 P. Venkat Reddy, S/o. Rami Reddy, M/s. Saujanya Wines, (276) Aliva Village, Anumula Mandal, Nalgonda District. 10 G. Srinivas, S/o. Maisaiah, M/s. Urvasi wines, ( L.No.267), Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Govt of A.P., Revenue ( Excise.II) Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner, Proh & Excise, Hyderabad. 3 The Proh & Excise Superintendent, Ranga Reddy, Ranga Reddy Dsitrict. 4 The Proh & Excise Superintendent, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to Issue a Writ order or direction more one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent, in issuing G.O.Ms.No. 991, Revenue ( Excise.II) Department, dt. 4.12.2004 and the consequential G.O.Ms.No. 184 Revenue ( Excise-UU) Department dt. 7.2.2005 as arbitrary, illegal, unjust, contrary to law, in violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed to petitioners herein under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also having the effect of being contrary to the Directive principles of State Policy apart from being contrary to the provisions of the A.P. Excise Act, 1968 and the A.P. Indian Liquor and Foreign Liquor rules, 1970 and for consequential direction to the respondents to consider the case of the Petitioners herein for renewal of their IL-24-B Licenses in accordance with law. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.SUBBA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court made the following : ORDER: It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioner and admitted to by the learned Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise that the subject matter of this writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in W.A. No. 344, 345, 346 and 347 of 2005 dated 22-3-2005. In the circumstances, following the said judgment this writ petition is disposed of by and in terms of the observations and directions made therein. No costs. _____________ N.V.RAMANA,J 25TH April, 2005 tvk To 1 The Secretary, Revenue ( Excise.II) Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner, Proh & Excise, Hyderabad. 3 The Superintendent, Proh & Excise, Ranga Reddy, Ranga Reddy Dsitrict. 4 The Superintendent, Prohibition and Excise, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. 5) 2 CD copies 6) 2 CCs to Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise, High Court of A.P. Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) Form-NIC-OGS/WP{JGK}