IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38260 of 2011 Sindhu Devi, wife of Subhash Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 13.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is the Informant of the case who had complained of illegal withdrawal of around 8 lacs rupees from the bank on her forged signature by accused Parshu Ram Kumar. Subsequently, she herself was made an accused since there was material that she had connived in the said withdrawal. Considering that the investigation is closed and the petitioner had remained in custody since 13.9.2011, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Sarmera P.S. Case No. 51 of 2010, subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other shall be the cousin Dewar of the petitioner namely, Rudal Yadav. The bailor will also undertake 2 to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it positively within three months in view of the nature of offence for which he is directed to send a list of the witnesses fixing specific dates for production of the witnesses along with a copy of this order in connection with Sarmera P.S. Case No. 51 of 2010 to the Superintendent of Police, Nalanda at Biharsharif and the Superintendent of Police, Nalanda at Biharsharif is directed to ensure production of the witnesses on the date so fixed by the Trial Court so that there is no further delay in trial. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)