IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25155 of 2010 MANNU KUMAR SINGH @ MANNU SINGH SON OF LATE BHOLA SINGH, R/O VILLAGE & P.S. HASANPUR, DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR. -PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --OPP.PARTY 3 24.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named accused in this case and as it appears from the first information report as well as the order of learned Sessions Judge that he carry allegation of abusing the informant by naming his caste. This case appears not attracting the provisions of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act as held by the Apex Court in the case of Gorige Pentaiah V. State of Andhra Pradesh, (2008) 12 Supreme Court Case 531. Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioner, in the event or their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rosera, Samastipur, in 2 Hasanpur P.S. Case no. 15 of 2010, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date before the court below at least for one year or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad