IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15961 of 2006 1. SUNIL KUMAR PANDEY, son of Sri Sidheshwar Pandey, resident of village – Saidpur Gowasa, Narhat, P.S. Narhat, District – Nawada. 2. Nitya Kumar Sinha, son of Rajeshwar Prasad Gupta, resident of village – Therasarai, P.O. Jalalpur, District – Nawada. 3. Markandey Nath Durge son of Sri Manohar Murli Nandkuliar, resident of village – Uraina, P S – Mofussil, District – Nawada. 4. Md. Naushad son of Md. Rahuf Khan, resident of village – Ratani, P O- Budhwara, P.S. Gobindpur, District – Nawada. ______________ Petitioners Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 2. Secretary, Rural Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 3. District Magistrate cum Collector, Nawada. 4. Deputy Development Commissioner, Nawada. 5. Block Development Officer Rajauli, Nawada. 6. Block Development Officer Pakribarawan, District – Nawada. ----------- 04. 12.7.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioners and counsel for the State. On the basis of earlier direction passed by this Court a counter affidavit on behalf of Cabinet Vigilance has been filed in which it has been categorically indicated that all has not been done well with the preparation of panel of 2002 and 2004. Many instances of wrong doing have been indicated based on the vigilance enquiry which was in turn based on the direction of the Court. With the claim of the petitioner not being totally above board and as the cloud or the question mark on the status of the appointments made from such panels has been seriously raised, the Court has reservation in passing any direction for payment to the petitioner. The matter is left open to the district authorities or other 2 functionaries of the State to proceed in the matter in accordance with the report of the vigilance and take some decision on this issue. The writ application is disposed of with the above direction. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)