IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WPMS NO. 7630 OF 2001 Kr. Raghav Chandra ……………………..Petitioner. Versus Munsif, Kashipur and others. …………………..Respondents. Mr. Gopal K. Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents no. 1 and 2. 25th July, 2008 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 16.3.1985 and 25.5.1987 passed by the opposite party no. 1 (Annexure Nos. 2 A & 7 to the writ petition) and order dated 18.12.1991 passed b y opposite party no. 2 (Annexure No. 8 to the writ petition). 2. The controversy involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court dated 22.12.2006 passed in WPMS No. 688 of 2006 Kr. Raghav Chandra Vs. Munsif Kashipur and others. 3. Present writ petition is allowed in terms of the aforesaid judgment. (P.C.Verma, J.) 25.7.2008 Rathour