IN TEE HIGHVCOUR”? {)F JUBICATURE ”1T J‘éBAIPURQ 3: w EJETITIDN muff} C> '1 w 0? 1998. KU? RT WWI ‘ML‘WNW iged absut 15 ywws D/o hm Krishna r D s xIaLQhn-w, Winonthwugh natural Guardwn Qhri Krid'ma fwsv 1Qhnsiv reagent pad: ?i:'1g.; gmga, Distt Palice 1231mm tatmn (‘1 a P). TehQiL n .u PET. I’l‘ IGNER VQ?SU.S 313‘? O {\IDE NTS l. “safe of wachy‘J Praueqh thraugb ecretary Vchool Tauca ”’7 r tmn Gcvt of M P , Vallabh W¥aw9n Bhoml (V P ) K 7 a PVH-é 0f Mennwrv ?oucatmn ; Vtgéhya Pv’adt‘sh Bhanal thcnugh secretary, Born‘u of Secancarv Edacatwn “II P.,Bhopal (M S Q 3. Regianal Officer Bearé of Czecsndaw Fcucatmn Ra pm, Branch Asaipur \M P; . PETITIOLS UTT‘JR ERVPTCH* ggo of my; CQNmrPTT’U’PLO‘T OF I61; “ w 09x \ “hari bGuRT v FAT i$GARH 2 BILASPUR WRET §3tT§T3CN NG. 596‘? CF @998 s :‘TF‘ONER Kumas’i Kama \iaishnav \jersus RESPONDENTS State of Madhva Pradesh & whys (W?§t Petitiw under Ariiche 226 of the Constitution of india} Smgie Eench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agaiho’cri. J. Present :— None far the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panei Lawyer for the State. QRDER {OR/M.) (Passed en this 01ft” day 0f September, 291 1) A- The matte; i3 caiieti for hearing twice. None appears nor is any representation made on behaif of the peiitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. 2. in View of the above, the matter is dismissed ior want of proeecution. 3. Registry is directed to send a eopy of this order to the petitioner, i0 rt’nwith . Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Sdl- ' egg“... i