1 hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1781 OF 2011 Ms. Roshani Sukharaji Bafna ... Petitioner Versus Ramniklal Devchand Shah and anr. ... Respondents Ms. R.S.B. Bafna petitioner in person. Mr. Ashok Gade, Advocate for respondent no. 1. Mr. S.A. Shaikh, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL,J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 15, 2011 P.C. Heard both the learned counsel and petitioner in person. She says, her hard earned money is not paid by respondent. Other two cases be also transferred to same court at Dahanu, and to ensure time bound schedule for disposal of cases. The learned Additional Sessions Judge found that the events seeking action under Section 138 of N.I. Act has taken place within the jurisdiction of Dahanu Court. On going through the record, issuance of notice from Mumbai even was taken place at Dahisar. I do not see any 2 error in Additional Sessions Judge in returning of the complaint to be presented before the competent court. The complainant to present her complaint before the court at Dahanu. The parties to appear before the learned Judge on 5.10.2011. No separate notice to the accused in the said proceedings. The learned Judge, thereafter shall expeditiously dispose of the case considering the difficulties of ill health explained by the complainant. Petition disposed of. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)