IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 20443 of 2009 Kamlesh Kumari and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. Raman B. Garg,, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana for the State. RANJIT SINGH J. The petitioners were placed under suspension on account of their involvement in a criminal case. The petitioners have, accordingly, filed this writ petition to challenge the suspension with a further prayer that the petitioners be considered for grant of second ACP w.e.f. 01.10.2008 and their pay be fixed, accordingly. The suspension of the petitioners have already been revoked and that part of the relief as claimed in the writ petition is rendered infructuous. In the reply, it is also stated that the case of the petitioner for grant of second ACP would be considered as and when the criminal case is finalised as the petitioners have to maintain a good record of service. Counsel for the petitioners points out that the criminal case has been finalised. If that be so, let the petitioners make a representation to the respondents and if they do so their case for grant of ACP be considered in accordance with law. The writ petition is rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. December 08, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE