1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR M.C.A. NO. 216/98 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3501 OF 1997 Ayodhyaram s/o Late Sitaramji Naidu .vs. Union of India, through A.G. & others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. A.S. Kilor, Advocate for applicant, Mr. S.B. Bangde, Advocate for respondent, CORAM : S.A. BOBDE & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATED : APRIL 22, 2010. Heard. The petitioner has challenged his repatriation after the period of deputation was over. We find that the Government Servant has no right to remain on deputation even after the said period is over. Mr. A.S. Kilor, learned Advocate for applicant/ petitioner, states that there are 218 vacancies in the respondent Department at the place where the petitioner was sent on deputation. He accordingly submits that the petitioner’s case can be considered for absorption in any of 2 the said vacancies. As far as this aspect is concerned, we are of the view that the petitioner should make a representation, within a period of one week, to the respondents making a request for absorption or any other appropriate request. The respondents shall consider the representation and decide the same in accordance with the law within a period of three months from the receipt of the representation and pass orders accordingly. Till the representation is decided, the petitioner shall not be repatriated to the parent department. With the above directions, the M.C.A. stands disposed of. J. Judge Judge