In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-35510 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: November 25, 2011 Mangal Singh ---Petitioner versus State of Punjab and other ---Respondents Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH *** Present: Mr. R.K.Malik, Advocate for the petitioner *** Gurdev Singh, J. Heard. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that after the registration of the FIR, a compromise was entered into between the petitioner and the complainant, who is his own wife, and that as per that compromise, the gold ornaments were returned to the complainant and she was also paid ` 60,000/- As narrated in the FIR, the gold ornaments were never returned by the petitioner to the complainant and that he had paid only ` 28,000/- against the sum of ` 60,000/-. Thus, the real dispute between the parties is about the return of the gold ornaments and the payment of the balance Crl. Misc. No. M-35510 of 2011(O&M) -2- amount. Notice of motion be issued only if a sum of ` 2,00,000/- is deposited by the petitioner with the Registrar ('General) of this Court. In case that amount is deposited by the petitioner, then in the event of his arrest by the Arresting Officer, he shall be released on bail to his satisfaction subject to the following conditions:- (i)He shall Join the investigation as and when required by the Investigating Officer. (ii)He shall not offer any threat, promise or inducement to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing the same to the Investigating Officer/Court; and (iii)He shall not leave the limits of this country without prior permission of the Court. At this stage, it has been submitted by counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is not in a position to deposit ` 2,00,000/- . In these circumstances, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this petition. Dismissed. (GURDEV SINGH) JUDGE November 25, 2011 PARAMJIT