•'l. Kii ^OH'.BI.S LHI®i_COUR4_0?_GHHASIIS^Ki_^la^_BIIi^SFU^ SIHGLfi-SESitCH We (Undsr Article 226-22'?. 14, Other than service raatter) /2002 Canstitutian ®fTndla ^ PETITIOHER PANKAJ VYAS. S/B S^RI BABULAL VYAS A§ed Abput 23 y®ars» LiquT Licencee, a/» Jawahar Para, Balsdj, Bal»d, District Dux-g(c.G«5 K .-S" V RESPOHDBiSiTS! .s^^l .^i^ .^•y^'"" STATS CF CrBIA'CTISS&BH Threugh Qamnlssiener Sxcise* Ralpur (C.Q.) COLL3CTOR. RA3HANDGAON, Llcftncing Authority, Sfeate »f Chhattisgerti( Rajnandgaen (C.G.)« „.-.- c<~: • ' d0--,•»' P3TITION UliDER A&TICO-LS 14, 16, 226/227 CCKSTITOTICN OF INDIA ?0& 40% REDUCTXON IW LICSNCE yES &ND OTH3RS CONDITIQNS O&^liICEHCB^SIMII.AR GH30BD AND^OH_PAK[TY^Tg_^KB^Mfi^R aiOP.-LiCEl.!CE ALLOTtED.ON TSHDER_GE ROAB RAJKANDGAOH ^40%-BBI.SW_FIXED_RS,TE_ _I,IGENCE_^EE,_ ^' l,g^ HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR. CHHATTISGARH SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI H.L. DATTU, C.J. Writ Pefrtipn No.929 of 2002 Petitioner; Respondents: Pankaj Vyas versus State of Chhattisgarh and another Present: Shri Yashwant Tiwari, counsei for the petitioner. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Government Advocate for the State/respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 2nd March, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave of this Courtto withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission sought for is granted. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. ' SdA ChiefJustice