1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.571 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO.3368 OF 2007 Mayura Sanjay Gupta .. Plaintiff versus Asha L. Gupta & Ors. .. Defendants Mr.Mayur Shetty i/by Gagrats for the plaintiff. Ms.Sunita Pant i/by Thakore Jariwala & Associates for defendant Nos.1 to 3 & 5. CORAM : R.S.MOHITE, J. DATE : 19th July 2010. P.C.: . This is a chamber summons made by the original plaintiff to bring on record certain facts which have occurred subsequent to the date of filing of the suit. The learned advocate for defendant Nos.1 to 3 and 5 opposes the chamber summons on the ground that prayer (ca) which is sought to be added would violate Order II, Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as previous suit had been filed without asking for that prayer. In my view, the chamber summons can be allowed subject to the rights and contentions of the defendants who contend that prayer cannot be granted for any legal reason. The chamber summons is, therefore, made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Amendment to be carried out within four weeks. The chamber summons is disposed of. (R.S.MOHITE, J)