1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3809/2009 ( Pratap Baburao Deshmukh -: versus :- State of Maharashtra and others ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : NOVEMBER 06, 2009. Heard Shri S.R. Deshpande, learned counsel for petitioner and learned A.G.P. for respondents. It is apparent that, petitioner was not selected by following proper procedure and his services were approved from 1.1.1993 till 3.3.1993 and thereafter from 6.3.1993 till 5.4.1993. His services were terminated in 1993 and that termination was challenged by filing ULPA Complaint No. 368/1993. He withdrew that complaint because Minister on 14.07.1996 directed that he should be reinstated on his post. He was accordingly reinstated on 29.11.1996 for period upto 21.12.1996. The appointment order specifically mentions that his services will come to an end on 21.12.1996 automatically. This subsequently termination forms subject matter of reference IDA No.13/2001. The Labour Court Amravati has considered all the facts and found that the petitioner did not enter the services and was not permanent 2 employee. There was break in his service from 1.10.1993 for about three years, and provisions of Section 2[oo][bb] were clearly applicable. These findings cannot be said to be either erroneous or perverse. No case is made out warranting interference in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is therefore dismissed. No costs. JUDGE Rgd.