-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.8024 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.8024 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.8024 OF 2005 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.8023 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.8023 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.8023 OF 2005 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Ms Preeti Rathod i/b M/s.Kiran Jain & Co. for the Applicant Ms M.M.Deshmukh A.P.P. for State Mr.R.N.Bhagattjee for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : DECEMBER 13,2006. : DECEMBER 13,2006. : DECEMBER 13,2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate for the Applicant. Application for condonation of delay is opposed by the Advocate for the Respondent. Considering the fact that Memorandum of Appeal is filed within limitation, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 2. Place the Application for leave on board on 21st December 2006. -2- JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE