EEEEE.£E-§£EEEB.§§H§AEEE§§AE& ?54: 1a 2* IFD)’ K of 2001 Saukhilal Khunte Son 0f Dehhu Khunte, aged about 31 years, Werking as'AsMstant Teacher at Gmrt. Middle School, Kargikhurd‘ Earikota District Bilaspur, Resident of Village Hardidihy Post Kasanda, Tahsil Sakti District Bilaspur. No o (LA. Baliram Suryawanshi Son of Baratu _ ' Suryawanshi, aged about 32 years, Working at Govt. l3rimary School i1 Lokband, Parikota, Districo Bilaspurq 5'. KmSheelu Hanna $amue1, Daughter k of Benjamin Suryawanshi, aged 33 years, Working as Assistant Teacher at Gov+n Middle School, ‘9 ' Bharni, Diat‘xict Bilaspur Resident of Behind Trafic Police j; ~ Station Link Road, Azad Nagar Bilaspur. 4“ Ku.$uman Gaurkhedq, daughter of Maro‘bi Gaurkheda, aged 27 years Working as Assiatant Teacher at Janpad Balika Prathmik Shala Bharni District Bilaspur residem; of {»( nf ’1 y ‘E‘ t: r , ; COD'tdcoguv i u»2n¢ k Near Telephene Exchange, Telipara, Bilaspur 5‘. Prem Kumar Burman Son 9f Dashrathram f Burman Aged 37 years Wcrking as Asgistant Teacher at Janpad Kanya Balika Shala r Sargaon, Bilaspur Residén’c 9f Village Saragaun Vial. Bilha District Bilaswra 6.‘ Km Jasmani Eakka, Daughter 9f Reme jeyus Eakka, aged 28 years woming as Assistant Teacher, Nawapathra Bilaspur reSident of Kargikala, Via. Kargi Rcad, Kata, District i§ Bilaspur 7« Ku.Antgnia Mina daughter of Remejeyus Tig-‘z ga, aged 33 years working as aesistan‘t teacher Kanya Prathmik Shala, Pipar‘barai Bilaspur resident ef City KetWali Quarters Bilaspur Ohhattisgarh VERSUS __—————— aw Resgondeng : 1. The State of Chhattisgarh Through'the Secretary Department of School Education, D.K.Bhawan Raiyur Chha‘btisgarh 2. The Directer mE Public instructims SCh’ ‘ ~ eel Education, Government ef Ghhattisgar} —rh , Jail Read, Raipur Ghhattisgarh 5* District Educatien Officer Government of Chhattisgarh Opgesite Collecters Gffice, Bilaspur Chha‘ttisgarh Application under Sectien 19 of the ééeieistreiiy§££y£e nals Acti_l.93§ir , am W mgMN/‘w m gag WW WTW‘ %a11?‘rqm SE : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava: J. §§wa3m2G10 Shri M D, Dhote; caunselforthe Shri Satish Gupta, GA. for the S Heard. - The petitioners have med this pe been given to Asst. Teachers appointet appmached the Tribunal by ming Origii 2$,8.1992), wherein Tribune! directed bi stated that the State chalienged the sak Ne6892/1 9% which was dismissed vide in number of cases, this C respondents to consider the cases, Accordingiy, this petition is also ( make representation, if so advised, to c perspective. if the petitioners stand on the s Madhya Pradesh State Administrative ‘i Yadrr and 5e oihers Vs. State ofMP. the Supreme Court in S_L.P. (Civi!) appropriate erder wouid be passed by th x petitioners. tate, tition claiming the similar benefits as have i in between the year 1983-1984 who had iai Appiication No.2745/1989 (decided on anefits to be given to ail teachers, it is also order before the Supreme Court in SLP. 2 order dated 3.1 .1994. ouit has passed orders directing the lisposed of with liberty to the petitioners to onsider their cases on its own merits and ame footings’ as per order passed by the 'ribunai in QA. No.2745i89 (Madhukant & others) and subsequently confirmed by No.6892/93 by order dated 3.1.1994, I e respondents authority Manln§ra . moh J a : u