: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.315 OF 2008 Smt.Philomina Nair ..Applicant. Vs. Mr.Mehmood Amir Shaikh ..Respondent. Mr.J.Shekhar i/b.M/s.J.Shekhar & Co. for the Petitioner. Mr.Kini i/b.Mr.Suresh Dubey for the Respondent. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 12TH JUNE, 2008 DATED : 12TH JUNE, 2008 DATED : 12TH JUNE, 2008 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : It is difficult to interfere with the impugned order and judgment. That the requirement of the landlord/Respondent is bona-fide, is established. 2. On the question of comparative hardship, unfortunately no evidence was lead on behalf of the Applicant. Even in the lower Appellate Court, no application was made to lead evidence. Even in this Court there is no application for leading evidence. The statement is only made across the bar at the time of admission. In these circumstances, it is difficult to accept the submissions regarding comparative hardship made across the bar. : 2 : 3. In the circumstances, the Civil Revision Application is dismissed. 4. The time to vacate is extended upto 31st March, 2009 subject to the Applicant filing the usual undertaking on affidavit within eight weeks from today including an undertaking to hand over vacant and peaceful possession on or before 31st March, 2009 subject to any orders of the Apex Court. ***