IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.18760-M of 2008 Date of Decision:10.2.2011 Rajesh Kumar .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Gurveen H. Singh, Addl. A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.16 dated 17.1.2006 registered under Sections 429/468 IPC, Section 6 Wireless 1933 and Section 4,20 Telegraph Act 1885 at Police Station City Kapurthala. The present petition is pending since 2008. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State on instructions from ASI Ranjit Singh has pointed out that charges were framed in the year 2007. Surprisingly, the matter is still pending before the trial Court. No evidence has been recorded so far. Even though, the proceedings were not stayed by this Court. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to expedite the trial and complete the same within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order by holding day to day trial and further no unnecessary adjournment shall be granted to the prosecution to lead their evidence. The petitioner will be at liberty to raise all the requisite pleas before the trial Court. 10.2.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE