IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.62 of 2006 RAMDEO PASWAN Versus THE CHAIRMAN,B.S.E.B. & ORS With CWJC No.282 of 2006 TRIBHUWAN SINGH Versus THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BO With CWJC No.426 of 2006 HARPAL CHOUDHARY Versus THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BO With CWJC No.427 of 2006 JAGAT PRASAD SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR With CWJC No.460 of 2006 MADAN PANDEY Versus BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD& With CWJC No.490 of 2006 RAM SHOBHIT CHOUDHARY Versus THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BO With CWJC No.856 of 2006 KRISHNA DEO RAM Versus THE BIHAR STATE ELEC.BOARD &O With CWJC No.938 of 2006 RAM CHANDRA SAW Versus THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BO With CWJC No.1566 of 2006 DASHRATH SINGH Versus BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD& With CWJC No.1630 of 2006 RAM ANUJ SHARMA Versus THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BO With CWJC No.1635 of 2006 DASHRATH PRASAD SINGH Versus BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD& With CWJC No.1665 of 2006 RAM CHANDRA SAHNI Versus BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD& With CWJC No.1686 of 2006 ROHAN YADAV Versus THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BO With CWJC No.1784 of 2006 SHEO NATH PANDEY Versus THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BO ----------- 3. 10.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent – Board. A counter affidavit has been filed in some of the cases. All the writ applications are related to common issue with regard to the payment of retiral dues and other dues, as such they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents Board submits that in case petitioners file a representation stating the details of their claims, the same would be considered without delay as per law. Notwithstanding the above, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of their claims, petitioners propose to file separate representation before the Secretary of the respondent Board enclosing the copy of the relevant documents if any, in support of such claim along with certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks from today. In case such representations are filed, the Secretary of the respondent Board shall consider each of the claims raised by the petitioners in their representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the pending claims of the petitioner could be settled with statutory interest as per the rules issued by the Board in this regard without delay. However, if any of the claims upon consideration are found not admissible, the same shall be communicated to the petitioners with reasons thereof. All the above writ applications are disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)