IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41468 of 2008 SAMSE ALAM @ MD.SHAMSE ALAM . Versus STATE OF BIHAR THRU.C.B.I. . ----------- 9. 16-Apr-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the CBI. The provisional bail granted to the petitioner on 14.1.2009 has been extended from time to time but with a warning that examination of defence witness must be concluded without any delay. In view of nature of order proposed to be passed, the order passed by this Court on 31.1.2010 and lastly on 12.3.2010 may be treated a part of this order. As would appear from the earlier two orders referred to above, this Court has been indulgent and had granted ample opportunity to the petitioner to close the examination of defence witnesses. The report received from the trial court shows that after 12.3.2010 no defence witness was produced. Although, learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed for extending the provisional bail for some more time, this Court is not persuaded to grant any further indulgence to the petitioner keeping in view the order passed on 13.1.2010 and on 12.3.2010. Hence, the prayer for 2 extending the provisional bail granted to the petitioner is rejected. He must surrender to custody forthwith failing which the trial court shall take all steps to take him into custody forthwith. It goes without saying that the trial court shall make all efforts to conclude the trial without any delay. This application is disposed of. Let a copy of this order be sent by fax to the court of Additional Sessions Judge, XI, Patna in connection with Sessions Trial No. 523 of 2004. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)