1 appl872.10.sxw ssm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 872 OF 2010 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2044 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 1131 OF 2009 Sitara Shipping Ltd. .....Appellant Vs. Speedy Multimodes Limited ......Respondent Mr. M.R. Khatri i/by Mr. S.S. SHetty for the Appellant. Mr. V.V. Khemka for the Respondent. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 8th MARCH, 2011. P.C.: Heard. 2 The suit is admittedly for damages. Therefore, the Plaintiff could not have asked to deposit the money or sought interim order because the damages get crystallized on the date of decree and not earlier. The entire motion is misconceived. Therefore, the prayer is rightly rejected by the learned Single Judge. Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (D.K. DESHMUKH, J.)