IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN TUESDAY, THE 8TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 17TH BHADRA 1931 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2695 of 2008() ------------------------------ CRA.746/2006 of II ADDL.SESSIONS COURT, ERNAKULAM ST.3187/2004 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-II, ALUVA .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): PETITIONE/APPELLANT/ACCUSED ------------------------------------------------ K.B.SIDHARTHAN, KALUKATTIL VEEDU, KUMBLA VARMANA KORNNAR, EDATHURUTHY P.O. BY ADV. SRI.S.SUDHISH KUMAR SRI.K.Y.TOMY RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT/STATE -------------------------------------------- 1. SAJEEVI MATHEW, S/O.MATHEW KASPER, KANAPPILLY VEEDU, ANGAMALY KARA, ANGAMALY VILLAGE. 2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.ANITHA M.N. (EKM) FOR R1 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.P.P.RITHWIK FOR R2 THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.S.GOPINATHAN, J ---------------------------------- Crl.R.P.NO. 2695 OF 2008 -------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of September, 2009. J U D G M E N T Aggrieved by the conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act in S.T. 3187/2004 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Aluva, which was confirmed in Crl.Appeal No.746/2006, by the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Ernakulam, the revision petition was filed. 2. The matter is settled between the petitioner and the first respondent. Annexure A compounding petition was filed. Having heard either side, I find no reason to reject the petition. Hence compromise is recorded and the revision petitioner would stand acquitted u/s.147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act read with section 320(8) of the code of Criminal Procedure and set at liberty. The bail bond executed by him would stand cancelled. P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE. pm