CWP No.2112 of 2009 09.7.2009 Present: Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate, for the respondent. The petitioner had approached this Court by way of CWP No.514 of 2003. It was disposed of by this Court on 26.5.2008. The operative portion of the judgment reads thus:- “After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we are of the considered view that the impugned order dated 23.5.2003 was passed behind the back and without affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. For lack of observance of principle of natural justice, the order dated 9.3.1989 cannot be legally sustainable. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 23.5.2003 is also not legally sustainable. Therefore, it is set aside. However, the liberty is given to the respondent to hear the grievance of the petitioner and pass speaking order after affording him, proper opportunity of hearing within two months from today after hearing the petitioner or her representative and the departmental representative also. In view of the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of.” In sequel to the order dated 26.5.2008, the petitioner was heard in person by the Managing Director of the respondent- Corporation. The representation made by the petitioner was rejected by the Managing Director. The order was conveyed to the petitioner on 30.8.2008. It is also borne out from the record that the petitioner had filed a contempt petition in this Court, which was dismissed on 4.5.2009. The relief as prayed for by the petitioner cannot be granted since he has not assailed the order passed by the Managing Director of the respondent-Corporation conveyed to him on 30.8.2008. Consequently, there is no merit in the present petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. CMP No.4215/2009 Infructuous. (Jagdish Bhalla), CJ. (Rajiv Sharma), J. July 9, 2009. (rkv)