Criminal Revision No. 112 of 2010 28.05.2010 Present: Mr. M.L. Brakta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for the respondent. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that one of the conditions imposed by the learned Special Judge (Fast Track Court), Kullu is that the vehicle would be released by the police on production of original Registration Certificate. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the vehicle had temporary registration and there was no registration certificate issued as such. In these circumstances, it was not possible to have complied with the condition of production of original Registration Certificate. This fact should and ought to have been put before the learned Trial Court for consideration and not in revision before this Court. This Court only exercises jurisdiction to consider the legality of the order on the facts as pleaded and adjudicated by the learned Trial Court. Obviously if this fact has not been urged before the learned Trial Court, I do not intend to interfere in the order in exercise of revisional jurisdiction. This revision petition is accordingly disposed of. However, it will be open to the petitioner herein to approach learned Special Judge (Fast Track Court), Kullu and to bring to its notice that the Registration Certificate of the vehicle can not be produced for the reasons which are tenable in law. Petition disposed of. No order as to costs. May 28, 2010 (Dev Darshan Sud), (KRS) Judge