CR No. 3279 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No. 3279 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.5.2011. Gordhan Singh .......Petitioner Vs. Sahib Singh and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr. R.K.Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... SABINA, J. Plaintiff-respondent No.1 had filed a suit for possession by way of partition. The suit filed by the plaintiff- respondent No.1 was decreed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) vide judgment and decree dated 3.6.2005. In the execution proceedings, petitioner filed the objections. Vide the impugned order dated 28.4.2011, the objections filed by the petitioner were dismissed. Hence, the present petition. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the instant petition deserves dismissal. Petitioner was not a party to the suit for partition filed by respondent No. 1. The petitioner purchased some portion of the property from Ram Diya-defendant No.3. Thus, the petitioner had stepped into the shoes of respondent No.3, after purchase of 137½ Square Yards area from him. Respondent No.3 was bound by the decree dated 3.6.2005. The petitioner, who had derived CR No. 3279 of 2011 (O&M) -2- his right after purchase of plot from respondent No.3, thus, could not file the objections alleging fraud. The petitioner could have become a party in the suit after he had purchased the plot from respondent No.3. In these circumstances, no ground for interference is made out. Dismissed. (SABINA) JUDGE May 17, 2011 Gurpreet