THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CRP No.1463/2011 Date of Order: 26-4-2011 Between: 1. Lanke Govindarajulu and another. ..Petitioners and 1. Davuluri Umamaheswara Rajasekhara Rao and another. ..Respondents The Court made the following Order: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CRP No.1463/2011 Oral order: The petitioner/plaintiffs filed this revision under Art. 227 of the Constitution of India to revise the orders of the Senior Civil Judge, Nandigama dt. 28-2-2011 passed in IA No.144/2010 in OS No.115/2007, whereunder petition filed by the plaintiffs under Order 16 Rules 4 to 6 CPC requesting the Court to summon the Village Revenue Officer, Gudimetala, Chandarlapadu Mandal, Krishna District to produce No.3 adangals for the years 2005-2010, IB Register, Cist receipts books for the years 2005-2010 and other relevant documents in respect of plaint schedule property situated in R.S.No.56 of Gudimetla Gram Panchayat and to give his evidence, was dismissed. The plaintiffs filed the suit for declaration and permanent injunction stating that they are in possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property, and along with the suit the plaintiffs filed some documents to prove their possession. After closure of the evidence of plaintiffs’ side evidence on 19- 11-2009, the suit was posted for the evidence of D.W.1. At that time, the plaintiffs filed the present IA stating that to prove their case that they are in continuous possession over the suit schedule property even after filing of the suit, they obtained adangals, cist receipts and other documents and filed at the time of filing of the suit, and to substantiate their claim they want to examine the revenue officials by summoning certain documents. The said petition was dismissed by the impugned order dt. 28-2-2011. Even after filing of the suit, the plaintiffs are entitled to file documents at the time of leading their evidence but once their evidence was closed, they cannot be permitted to prove their documents, which are now sought to be summoned by adducing the evidence of revenue officials. In view of the same, the impugned order passed by the trial court dismissing IA does not suffer from any illegality warranting interference by this court. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _______________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J. Dt.26-4-2011 kmr