IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39059 of 2009 DIPAK YADAV @ DIPU @ DEEPAK YADAV, S/o Ram Sogarath Yadav @ Sogarath Yadav Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 11.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 498A, 304B, 316 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The submission is that the complaint has been filed by the father-in-law of the present petitioner stating that his daughter who used to reside with the petitioner as his wife was taken away by in- laws on 02.08.2007 on the pretext that the daughter’s mother-in-law was seriously ill. The further submission is that in fact the petitioner had been forcibly got married to Leela Kumari the daughter of the informant and thereafter she was never accepted in the petitioner’s house and she had disappeared on her Naihar this false case has been filed upon the petitioner and his family. Taking into consideration the aforesaid - 2 - submissions, let the petitioner above named who is alleged husband and in custody since 30.07.2008 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Munger (M) P.S. Case No. 196 of 2007 arising out of Complaint Case No. 823C of 2007 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)