IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 13TH FEBRUARY 2007 / 24TH MAGHA 1928 WP(C).No. 4925 of 2007(J) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ 1. ABDUL HAMID KUNJI AHMED, S.S.MANZIL, DOOR NO.KMC, XIX-209, KUNDUVALAPPIL, PALLIKKAL, THANALANGARA-671 122, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 2. HAJIRA ABDUL HAMID KUNJI AHMED, S.S.MANZIL, DOOR NO.KMC, XIX-209, KUNDUVALAPPIL, PALLIKKAL, THANALANGARA-671 122, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.A.M.SHAFFIQUE SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR SRI.A.K.JAYASANKAR NAMBIAR RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY, SAFEMA, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, OFFICE OF THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND ADMINISTRATOR, MITTAL COURT, C-WING, 3RD FLOOR, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI-400 021. 2. THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORGEITED PROPERTY, 4TH FLOOR, LOK NAYAK BHAVAN, KHAN MARKET, NEW DELHI. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KASARAGOD. ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL SRI.JOHN VARGHESE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J. =================================== W.P.(C)No.4925 of 2007 =================================== Dated this the 13th day of February, 2007. JUDGMENT Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Solicitor General, this writ petition is disposed of directing that enforcement of Ext.P4 shall not be implemented till the disposal of the appeals filed by the petitioners before the second respondent was finally disposed of. The second respondent shall dispose of the appeals, as expeditiously as possible and in accordance with law. Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, Judge. sl.