IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 340 of 2006 (M/B) Sanjay Singh Chauhan, S/o Sri Mahendra Singh, R/o 79, Tilak Road, Dehradun. ……… Petitioner Versus 1. The Director, Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow. 2. The Assistant Director, Mandi Samiti, Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad, Garhwal Mandal, Dehradun. 3. The Sabhapati, Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, Niranjanpur, Dehradun. 4. The Secretary, Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, Niranjanpur, Dehradun ……… Respondents Mr. I.P. Kohli, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.C. Belwal, Advocate for the respondents. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Mr. I.P. Kohli, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.C. Belwal, Advocate for the respondents. 2. Mr. I.P. Kohli, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition, now, has become infructuous. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 15.06.2006 15.06.2006 G