WP(C) 1193/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.P.KATAKEY Heard Mr NNB Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr P. Roy, l earned state counsel appearing for State respondents; and Mr I. Choudhury, learn ed counsel for the Respondent Nos.7 & 8. The petitioner has filed the present petition challenging the NIT dated 11th May, 20009 issued by the President & Secretary of the Garoimari Anchalik Pa nchayat offering Four-Star Hahchari Chautara Weekly Market for settlement for th e period from 1st July, 2009 to 30th June, 2010. The further prayer made by the petitioner in the writ petition is for a direction to the Respondents to set asi de the order of settlement made in favour of the private Respondent, and also fo r a direction to the Respondents to settle the said market on any day other than Friday. According to the petitioner, he was settled with another market with sa me area of operation as that of the Four-Star Hahchari Chautara Weekly Market fo r the period ending 30th June, 2010. By the aforesaid NIT dated 11th May, 2009, the aforesaid market was put to sale for the period from 1st July, 2009 to 30th June, 2010, and the settlemen t order has been passed in favour of the private Respondent for the period up-to 30th June, 2010. Since the period of settlement is over, the writ petition has become inf ructuous. However, it will not preclude the petitioner to challenge the fresh NI T that may be issued by the appropriate authority under the Assam Panchayat Act, if he has any grievance against such NIT. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.