IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.1668 of 2006. Writ Petition No.1668 of 2006. Writ Petition No.1668 of 2006. K. Mohammed Ahmed ..Petitioner versus The Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai ..Respondent. Petitioner in person Mr.K.K.Singhvi a/w. Mrs.P.A.Purandare for B.M.C. Coram : Swatanter Kumar, C.J. & Coram : Swatanter Kumar, C.J. & Coram : Swatanter Kumar, C.J. & V.M.Kanade, J. V.M.Kanade, J. V.M.Kanade, J. Dated : 2nd April, 2008 Dated : 2nd April, 2008 Dated : 2nd April, 2008 P.C. 1. Today, the petitioner who appears in person prays for further adjournment on the ground that his counsel has not come. We may refer to our order dated 12th March, 2008 and 13th March, 2008, where last/final chance was given and no further opportunity was ordered to be given tothe petitioner for this purpose. In the affidavit filed by the Corporation it has clearly been stated that they have failed to hand over the area indicated in the affidavit to the petitioner. This was also recorded in the order of the Court dated 7.6.2007. Since then, the petitioner has neither accepted the offer nor has argued the matter. Indulgence was given by the Court to the counsel appearing for the -2- petitioners as well as for the petitioner since 6th June, 2007. The matter cannot be repeatedly adjourned for no reason. 2. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed. However, the Corporation shall issue the final offer in writing to the petitioner as stated in his affidavit and if the offer is not accepted within two weeks from today, the Corporation will be at liberty to proceed in accordance with law. ( Chief Justice.) ( Chief Justice.) ( Chief Justice.) (V.M.Kanade, J.) (V.M.Kanade, J.) (V.M.Kanade, J.)