IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE MONDAY, THE 9TH JULY 2007 / 18TH ASHADHA 1929 RP.No. 614 of 2007() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN AR.14/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/RESPONDENT --------------------------------------------- M/S.PATI BEL JV, PROJECT OFFICE (NORTH), CVP GARDENS, PERUMTHURUTHY P.O., THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA, DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS ACTING PROJECT MANAGER, SRI.WONG HOI WAY. BY ADV. SRI.K.SUBASH CHANDRA BOSE RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER ----------------------- M/S.G.K.GRANITES LTD., HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT OORAKKAD, KIZHAKKAMBALAM P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, KERALA STATE, A PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SRI.GEORGE ANTONY. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE ABRAHAM THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ---------------------------------- R.P. NO. 614 f 2007 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of July , 2007 O R D E R Heard both sides. Having regard to the submissions addressed before me, the Review Petition will stand allowed to the extent of deleting the last sentence in paragraph 1 of my judgment and substituting the same by the following sentence: 2. “The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent has not responded to Annexure A9”. The Review Petition will also stand allowed to the following further extent: 3. The second sentence in the last paragraph of my judgment will stand corrected as follows: Justice T.V.Ramakrishnan, retired Judge of this court is appointed as Arbitrator to adjudicate and settle all the disputes between the parties including the disputes which are subject matter of Annexure A9 and the claims of the respondents R.P.No.614/2007 2 narrated by them in paragraph 14 of the counter affidavit filed before this court. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. dpk