IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13882 of 2010 PRAMOD RAI, Son of Dasai Rai (Yadav), resident of Village- Laxmi Nagar, Mehsaul, Police Station- Mehsaul in the district of Sitamarhi. ......................Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR..................................................Opposite party. ----------- 3. 08.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 02.02.2010 in a case registered under Sections 395 and 397 of the I. P.C. The petitioner’s name sprang up on the confession of one Bhola Sah. Though neither any recovery has been made from possession of the petitioner nor the petitioner has been put on T. I. Parade. It is submitted on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner that initially the petitioner was arrested in a Arms Act case on suspicion and subsequently on confession of Bhola Sah the petitioner has been roped in two other cases apart from the present one and in all those cases the petitioner is on bail. Learned counsel for the State after going through the case diary submits that on confession of Bhola Sah the petitioner has been arrested though he has not been put on T.I. Parade nor any recovery has been made 2 from his possession. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State, let the petitioner, Pramod Rai, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, in connection with Darbhanga (Sitamarhi) G.R.P. Case No. 63 of 2009. It is made clear that the learned trial court is at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if he fails to appear on three consecutive dates or if he gets further involved in any such case. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)