IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN FRIDAY, THE 6TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 15TH KARTHIKA 1931 LA.App..No. 183 of 2008() ------------------------- LAR.477/1997 of ADDL.SUB COURT,KOLLAM .................... APPELLANT(S): APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS ------------------------------------ STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.P.N.SUMANGALA RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANT/RESPONDENT IN THE LAR --------------------------------------------- GOVINDAN, S/O.NARAYANAN, KINAYUVILA KIZHAKKETHIL VEETTIL, KOTTAKKAKOM CHERI, THRIKKADAVUR VILLAGE, KOLLAM. ADV. SRI.JOHN BRITTO FOR R1 SRI.C.A.RAJEEV FOR R1 THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------ LAA. No. 183 of 2008 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of November, 2009 J U D G M E N T Pius C. Kuriakose, J. We are not inclined to entertain this appeal any longer. Smt.P.N.Sumangala, learned Govt. Pleader urged before us that it is on guess work alone that the learned Subordinate Judge has granted enhancement under the impugned judgment. But we notice that to the evidence adduced by AW1, the claimant not even formal counter evidence was adduced by the Government. Though the learned Judge did not rely on Exts.A1 and A2 judgments in other LAR cases, we are sure that the learned Judge while re-fixing the land value, kept in mind A1 and A2 also. The total stakes involved in this appeal is also not large. For all these reasons we dismiss this appeal. No costs. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE ksv/-