$$ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B. : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. WRIT PETITION (Q No. 1889 Babla Futan S/o Shri Chandulal Age 58 years R/o Behind Shendre Amapara, G.E. Road, (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Muaicipal Corporation Through Commissioner, Raipur (C.G.) eh- 2. State of Chfaattisgari Collector, Raipur(C.G.) Smt. Kiran Mayee Nayak, Advocate vvith Shri C.R.Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, Advocate with Shri KashifShakeel, Advocate for respondent No. 1 . Shri V.V.S.Moorthy, Deputy Advocate General with Shri Utkarsh Verma, Deputy Govemment Advocate, for respondent No.2. ORDER (Passed oa 29al ofMarch,2007) 1. On mentioning W.P. (C.) No. 1889/2007, which was listed tomon-ow i.e. 30 March, 2007, is taken up alongwith the batch ofmatters. 2. In this petition, the facts and questions oflaw involved are the same as that ofinW.P. (C.) No. 257 of2007 (Deepak Kumar Shrivastava Vs. Municipal Corporation, Raipur & another) which faas been disposed of today i.e. 29 of March, 2007. This petition stands disposed of in the same tenns and conditions. 3. No order as to costs. ,—--==^——„_ SdA SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Amit