a6; Wa?/ SENGLE BENW aEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiseARI-I AT BILASPUR \ (CHHATTISGARH) w.P. (S) No. {03w of201o / PETlTlONER : Ram Ratan Tondon, S/o Late Shri 1/ Shivlal Tondon, aged about @years, R/o Vitlage—Khamriya (Junvani), P.O.- Jevra Sirsa, Distt. Eiurg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1) State: of Chhattisgarh \ Through-The Secretary Urban Administration and‘ Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2) Municipal Corporation Bhilai Through— Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, Distt. Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OR MANDAMUSIDIRECTION OF OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT. O1. Particulars about the petitioner : As mentioned above in the cause title. @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 1922 (£2010 I PETKTIONER Ram Ram} Tendon. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : Staterof Chhattisgarh & Another. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/ 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihatri, J. Shri Somkant Vanna, Advocate for petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Govt. Advocate for State. Shri H.B.Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Shri Jitendra Gupta, Advocate for the respondent 2. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 26 day of Aprii, 2010) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that by order dated 15m December, 2000a (Annexure P/l) the petitioners were granted regular appointment and posted for a period oftwo years on probation, wherein specific pay-scale was mentioned. Thereafter. an order was passed on 20m December, 2000 (Annexure P /2) whereby the pay scale as mentioned in the order dated 15m December, 2000 (Annexure P/l) was not granted to the petitioner, but was kept under determination. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submit that the process of determination of grant ofregular pay scale is under consideration. Be that as it may, ifthe respondents have varied salary or pay scale after grant of pay scale vide order dated 15m December, 2000 (Annexure P/l), that cannot be done without adording an opportunity ofhearing to the petitioners. However, at this stage, the Court will not interfere with the decision of the employer. The respondents 1 and 2 are directed to take immediate decision having regard to the order dated 15m December, 2000 and 20m December, 2000 (Annexure 13/2) and deteimine the proper pay scale of the petitioners and make payment thereof at the earliest. With the above directions, the petition is disposed of. Ashok F‘W Sd/- SATisH K. AGNIHOTRI Judge ”