IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2248 of 2007 MAHENDRA RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3/ 22/9/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. No one appears on behalf of respondent Nos. 3 to 5 despite valid service of notice. The petitioner was placed under suspension. The order of suspension was then recalled. No departmental proceedings were initiated against the petitioner, as it appears from the records of the case placed by the petitioner. The Court has not had the benefit of a counter affidavit. If the suspension was revoked unconditionally and no departmental proceedings were held against the petitioner, he cannot be denied his salary without any justification for the some when the suspension was not found to be justified culminating in order against him. The writ application is disposed with directions to the respondent Nos.3 and 5 that if no departmental proceedings were held against the petitioner and the order of suspension was revoked unconditionally, as is urged on behalf of the petitioner, let a decision with regard to his full wages for the period of suspension, in - 2 - accordance with law, be taken and paid within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands allowed. KC ( Navin Sinha,J )