IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.15936 of 2009 Date of Decision: October 20, 2009 Taranjit Singh & Others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & Others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Gurbinder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondents. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) This petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari, quashing Orders, Annexure P-8 (Collectively) passed in relation to the petitioners. Gist of the impugned orders is that benefit under the Assured Career Progression Scheme has been denied on the ground that result of the students taught by the petitioners was less than 50%. CWP No.15936 of 2009 [2] Learned counsel contends that the issue has been addressed by this Court while dealing with Civil Writ Petition No.1780 of 2009 titled `Malkiat Singh & Others vs. State of Punjab & Others’, decided on 26.8.2009 (Annexure P-10). Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Mr. B.S. Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Heard. Learned counsel for the respondents contends that indeed the issue is covered by the judgment rendered in Malkiat Singh’s case (supra). In view of the above, this petition is allowed in terms of judgment dated 26.8.2009 rendered in Civil Writ Petition No.1780 of 2009 titled `Malkiat Singh & Others vs. State of Punjab & Others’. (AJAI LAMBA) October 20, 2009 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?