WP(C) 1986/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY The petitioner, who is serving as an Assistant Teacher of the Dhobakura Nayapara L.P. School, which is a venture school in the Lakhipur Block of Goalpara Distri ct, is aggrieved by the effort of the Headmaster of the school (respondent No.4) who is trying to induct another teacher to replace of the petitioner. It is contended by Mr. A. Chamuah, learned counsel that the petitioner was appoi nted by the Managing committee of the school on 1.1.1996 and only to usurp the p etitioner’s share of financial benefit as a teacher of venture school, when the school is being considered for Govt. grant, the Headmaster has decided to termin ate the petitioner and to induct a new teacher in his place. Mr. MK Mishra, learned standing counsel, on the other hand, submits that the Ins titution in the present case is a venture school and the Writ Court should not e ntertain a challenge against a decision taken by a private body. In support of h is contention, the learned counsel relies upon the decision in Writ Appeal No. 2 27/2010 (Md. Ali Haidar vs. State of Assam ). Considering that the Institution is a private body where the intervention of the Writ Court may not be justified, I am disinclined to accept the writ petition. However, this order shall not take away the right of the petitioner to approach the Civil Court for redressal of his grievances. Ordered accordingly.