1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.6876/2010 Beeram Chand Vs. State Date of order : 21/7/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Mukesh Sharma for the petitioner. Shri G.S. Fauzdar, for the complainant. Shri Amit Punia, PP for State. ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State, learned counsel for the complainant and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case; he is in jail since long; investigation from the accused-petitioner is complete; nothing is to be recovered from the petitioner; trial will take a long time. Co-accused Bablu @ Brijraj has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 16.7.2010. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for complainant have opposed the bail application. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of this case but taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail. In the result, this bail application 2 u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Beeram Chand S/o Ram Lal shall be released on bail in F.I.R. No.98/2010, P.S. Chechat, Distt. Kota for offence u/s.136 of the Indian Electricity Act on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till conclusion of the trial. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/