i ! 1i ; L I ii THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WritW Petition No 4023 of 2004 g; Pqtmlmnr Pannanand Chauhan s/o Baratmm 1 Chauhan aged about 42 y ars R/o Vlllage '~ Mohanda, Tah Saraupah Dlstt J 1 i r 5 Mahasamund (C. G.) Vexsus pondents 1. Nagar Panchayat §ara1pah thmugh Chlef Municipal O$cer Sarawak Dlstt Mahasamund (C G) 2. Collector Mahasmund (C G) RIT PETITON UN DER ARTICLE 226(227 OF THE , ‘ ONS’I‘ITUTION OF INDIA : (SB Hon’ble Shn Saush K Agmhotn J ) M~~uwww“hV_.~.~ mm w . , § I 1 I l i ! i ‘ . L C Das Advocate for the petmoncr ‘ ' ‘ Slilmta R‘aghvendra Jam, Panel Pxadhan, Lawyer Advocate for the tor mspo‘xndent the respondent No.2. No 1 f . ‘ go g.“ mMwW—M— v M e 4 g ‘ a ORDER [ \ $ z (Passed on this 12th Day of Septembger, 2008) { i 1 1. Lea‘rned counsel appearmg for the peuuoner on mstruchons Ksubmlts that the peuuoner seeks to w1thdraw th1s pentlon w1th hberty to take recourse to the alternatlve statutory ‘ lemedy bytdmg an appeal before the Comm1ss1oner under the ‘ prowsmns of law However the e spent during the § pendency of th1s petmon mav not ome 1n the way of hmltatlon 2. Learned counsel appearing for the naspondents have no objection to the above submission mad: by learned counsel appean'ng for the petitioner. 3. In v1ew of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdlawn, ‘amgzgmxle ethw w” with the above—stated liberty consequently, M(W)P twNo 442 1/ 2004 1s also dlsmissed t ’ KI, 1 4. In the event the petitioner appmaches the statutoxy forum ‘ V g Withm a penod of two weeks h‘om today, delay shall not come , 7 v K 1n way 0t acceptance of the appeal] application. 1 i ‘ l i