IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.12527 of 2011 Date of Decision.19.07.2011 Jeewan Lal son of Krishan c/o K.C. Rice Mill, Sunam, Distt. Sangrur (Punjab) .....Petitioner Versus Punjab State Power Corporation Limited, Patiala, through its Chairman and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Arun Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Notice of motion. At the asking of Court, Mr. Navdeep Sukhna, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner shall supply three sets of complete paper book to the counsel appearing for the respondents for informing the authority properly the nature of order that is passed by this Court in this case. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner fervently seeks for direction to be issued to respondent No.1 to consider the representation (Annexure P-2). The grievance of the petitioner may be considered by respondent No.1 and an appropriate decision may be taken within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 3. The writ petition is disposed of on the above lines. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE July 19, 2011 Pankaj*