1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR First Appeal No. 676/2008 (Smt.Noorjahan wd/o Baban Barve & another VERSUS Sachin Baban Barve & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : AUGUST 29, 2008. On 07.07.2008, it was informed to the Court that the matter is likely to be compromised between the parties amicably by an out of Court settlement. Hence, this Court granted two weeks time to the counsel for the appellant to make a statement in that regard. On 29.07.2008, again time was sought by the counsel for the appellant and this Court, therefore, granted two weeks time to the appellant and the matter was directed to be listed on 13.08.2008, as a last chance. Again, when the matter was listed before this Court on 13.08.2008, the counsel for the appellant sought two weeks time to file 'No Instructions Pursis'. The matter was directed to be listed on today's board. The counsel for the appellant has neither filed any 'No Instructions Pursis' nor has made any statement in regard to the compromise between the parties. The matter is being 2 adjourned at the behest of the counsel for the appellant on a number of occasions. Today also, Ms. Chaitali Bhute, holding for Shri M. Anilkumar, states that the matter may be adjourned as the counsel has no instructions from the appellant. No further time can be granted on the same request which is being made on more than a couple of occasions. The first appeal is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. JUDGE APTE