IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 28450 of 1995 Between: B.Saroja, D/o.B.BrahmanaNdam, R/o.9-2-287/3/4, Langerhouz, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Executive Officer, Secunderabad Cantonment Board, Office of Cantonment Board, Secunderabad. 2 Adinarayana, S/o.Ananta Ramnaiah, R/o.5-214/C, Bhavani Nagar, Mosapet, Hyderabad. (R.2 impleaded as per Court order dt.13-3-1996 in W.P.M.P.No.35409 of 1995). (Petition is dismissed for default against R.2 as per Court order dated 7-2-2003). .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ of Mandamus duly declaring the acceptance of tender of R.Adinarayana dated 7-12-1995 in respect of Ward-4 of Secunderabad Cantonment Board as null and void and further to consider the next lowest tenders of petitioner. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. K.PRABHAKAR (Not present). Counsel for Respondent No.1: MR. A.RAJASEKHAR REDDY, STANDING COUNSEL FOR SECUNDERABAD CANTONMENT BOARD Counsel for Respondent No.2: (Case dismissed as against R.2 for default vide Court order). The Court made the following ORDER: None appears for the petitioner. By lapse of time, the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. _______________ N.V.RAMANA, J Dated: 15th September, 2004. Ksr/Ak* ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.The Executive Officer, Secunderabad Cantonment Board, Office of Cantonment Board, Secunderabad. 2.Two CD copies.