1 D. B. CIVIL SPECIAL APEAL (W) NO.583/98 JAGDISH SINGH & OTHERS V. BOARD OF REVENUE & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT ::: 25-03-2008 HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTUCE MR. NARAYAN ROY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI Mr. Sudheer Sharma, for Appellants. Mr. O.P.Boob, Addl. G.A., for Respondents. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 18th May, 1998, passed by the learned Single Judge in S. B. Civil Writ Petition No.1171/96, whereby the writ petition preferred by the appellants was dismissed. Appellant preferred writ petition to challenge the order of the Board of Revenue dated 26th September, 1995, mainly on the ground that reference so made by the Collector under Section 82 of the Land Revenue Act was after great delay of 22 years, therefore, the reference was not maintainable and, thereby, the order passed by the Board of Revenue pursuant to the reference order deserves to be set aside. The learned Single Judge considered 2 aforesaid aspect of the matter and after considering several judgments on the issue came to the conclusion that the allotment of the land being contrary to the statutory provisions, thus cannot sustain. The land was “Gair Mumkin Pahar”, thus was not available for allotment as per provisions of law. The learned Single Judge, has dealt with the issue after considering all the legal and factual aspects of the matter, as well as taking into consideration the judgments on the issue. Since allotment of the land was contrary to statutory provisions, thus issue decided by the learned Single Judge cannot be called for interference, inasmuch as the nature of the land is being “Gair Mumkin Pahar”, thus the allotment of “Gair Mumkin Pahar” is contrary to the statutory provisions of law. In view of the above, we do not find any reason to interfere in the order of the learned Single Judge. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to cost. (M.N. BHANDARI), J. (NARAYAN ROY), C.J. scd 3