SCA/288/2001 1/2 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 288 of 2001 With CIVIL APPLICATION No. 11634 of 2005 In SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 288 of 2001 With CIVIL APPLICATION No. 7156 of 2001 In SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 288 of 2001 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================== 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ============================================================== GUJARAT LOKHIT SEVA TRUST & 1 - Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 4 - Respondent(s) ============================================================== Appearance : MR BHUSHAN B OZA for Petitioner(s) : 1 - 2. GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent(s) : 1, DS AFF.NOT FILED (R) for Respondent(s) : 2, 5, MR HS MUNSHAW for Respondent(s) : 3, MR DIPAK C RAVAL for Respondent(s) : 4, ===================================================================== CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Date : 28/11/2005 SCA/288/2001 2/2 JUDGMENT ORAL JUDGMENT (Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA) In this petition, affidavit was filed on 14th December, 2000. This petition is dated 14th December, 2000 but given number only in January, 2001. It is pending before this court for almost 5 years without any interim orders except the order of notice of Rule. Now, gradually the respondent authorities are taking steps under the orders of the court passed in other cases to minimise the difficulties of the people of Ahmedabad. Therefore, Mr. Oza, learned counsel for the petitioners is not in a position to press this petition seriously. Accordingly, it is disposed of. Rule is discharged. Both the Civil Applications are disposed of as the main Special Civil Application is disposed of. ( B.J. Shethna, J. ) ( M.C. Patel, J. ) hki