IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45193 of 2010 1. MAHESH MISHRA 2. PAWAN MISHRA 3. GAGAN MISHRA @ GAGAN KUMAR MISHRA 4. NAND MOHAN MISHRA --- PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . --- OPP. PARTY ----------- 02 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the informant. Petitioners, who are cousin father-in-law, cousin devar and cousin bhaisur (elder brother of the husband), have approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Bhargama P.S. case no. 89 of 2010 instituted under Sections 302, 201, 120B/34 of the Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Considering the inter se relation of the victim and the petitioners herein, this Court is of the view that they were not in a position to assert any pressure in demanding dowry and ultimately committing murder of the victim. They do not reside in the same house. Learned counsel for the informant submits that they were also involved in clandestine disposal of the dead body by using urea and kerosene oil. The said allegations for the present may be treated true but would constitute offence punishable under Section 201 of the Penal Code. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the 2 case, this Court is inclined to extend them the privilege of bail. Let, petitioners, named above, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 04 weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Bhargama P.S. case no. 89 of 2010, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. Sym/ ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)