THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.510 OF 2000 ORDER: 1 When the matter is taken up for hearing Mr. Ch. Ravi Kumar learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that against the judgment in C.C.No.98 of 1997 and C.C.No.61 of 1996 whereby the petitioner was convicted, the petitioner preferred Criminal Appeals and the same were also dismissed and hence he filed two revisions before this court. According to him against the judgment in C.C.No.61 of 1996, Criminal Appeal No.83 of 1999 was filed and when the same was dismissed he preferred Crl.R.C.No.510 of 2000 and against the judgment in C.C.No.98 of 1997 Criminal Appeal No.146 of 1999 was preferred and when the same was also dismissed he preferred Crl.R.C.No.756 of 2000 before this court and Criminal R.C.No.756 of 2000 was dismissed of by this court on 21.12.2005. 2 As could be seen from the order passed in Crl.R.C.No.756 of 2000, the learned Judge of this court, while confirming the findings of the courts below, dismissed the said Revision, but, however, reduced the quantum of sentence of one year imposed by the courts below to six months. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the said sentence of one year imposed in the present case also may be reduced to six months. 3 Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also taking the fact that the offence took place in the year 1995 into consideration, this court takes lenient view and accordingly the said sentence of one year imposed by both the courts below is reduced to six months. Excepting the above modification, in all other aspects, this revision stands dismissed. The revision petitioner is directed to be taken into custody to serve the remaining period of sentence. The period of detention, which the petitioner has already undergone shall be given set off under Section 428 of Cr.P.C. -------------- 09.03.2010 kvsn