CRM-M-29355 of 2011 ::::::: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-29355 of 2011 Date of Decision:20.10.2011 Jasbir Kaur …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. S.S.Sodhi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. A.S.Rai, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) This is a petition for grant of pre-arrest bail in a Complaint Case RBT No.116/1 dated 27.10.2005/2007 titled as `Iqbal Singh Vs. Mehla Singh and others’ under Sections 302, 149, 120-B IPC pending before the JMIC, Ferozepur (Annexure P-4). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the wife of Jagminder Singh whose bail application has been wrongly dismissed by the learned Court below on the ground that the bail application of the co-accused has been dismissed by the High Court and she had confessed her guilt before Mukhtiar Kaur daughter of Sohan Singh. He further submits that three is no extra-judicial confession before Mukhtiar Kaur, rather it is a case of hear-se as it has been termed as an extra-judicial confession by the complainant. He further submits that the property in dispute belongs to one Naginder Singh who was handicapped and unmarried. It is alleged that he has been poisoned by his relations in order to usurp his property, but insofar as the petitioner is concerned, she has not usurped the property, rather she had purchased it to the extent of only 2 Kanals which has fallen in her Khata, against a valuable consideration. 1 CRM-M-29355 of 2011 ::::::: Learned counsel for the complainant has vehemently argued and has even referred to an order dated 02.08.2011 passed by this Court in CRM-M-19822-2011 and CRM-M-19384-2011 to contend that the bail applications of Mehla Singh and others have already been dismissed by this Court. It is not disputed by him that Mehla Singh and others are not similarly situated with the petitioner. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of this case especially the fact that the petitioner is the purchaser of the property and is not similarly situated to that of Mehla Singh and others who have allegedly usurped the property of the deceased, the present petition is allowed. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Trial Court on or before 31.10.2011. On her appearance before the learned Trial Court, the petitioner shall be released on bail by it on her furnishing bail bonds to its satisfaction. The petition stands disposed of. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) OCTOBER 20, 2011 JUDGE vinod* 2