1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1878 OF 2005 The New India Assurance Company Ltd. ... Petitioner Vs. Vinubhai Khandu Avhad and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. S.A.P. Thomes for Petitioner. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2006 DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2006 DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . It is the case of the Petitioners that the impugned order dated 16.10.2004 was passed without hearing the Petitioners, in other words exparte. In these circumstances, it will be open to the Petitioners to move the learned tribunal for setting aside the order or considering that this is the case where the Petitioner was not heard, it will be provisional review which will be available considering the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Grindlays Bank Ltd. Vs. INdustrial Tribunal, (1981) LLJ 327, (See Page 13 of the Judgment). Considering the above, petition disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner to move the tribunal. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)