IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21338 of 2009 MAHESH KANU, SON OF CHAND KANU, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHADAUL, P.S. HILSA, DISTT. NALANDA. ----- PETITIONER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.16992 of 2009 RAVINDRA CHAMAR @ RAVINDRA RAVI DAS, SON OF BILASH JAMADAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHADAUL, P.S. HILSA, DISTT. NALANDA. ------ PETITIONER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17/11/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The case is under Sections 302, 364, 201, 147,148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. In the F.I.R. there is general and omnibus allegation against number of accused persons out of whom one Kaila Paswan has been allowed bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 13.3.2007 passed in Cr. Misc. Case No. 41843 of 2006. Petitioners are in custody since 18.1.2009 and 16.12.2008 respectively. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that neither in the order of learned Sessions Judge nor in the case diary any criminal antecedent of the petitioner is mentioned. Considering the above facts and circumstances particularly the fact that one Kaila Paswan who is also named in the F.I.R., has been allowed bail by a Bench of this Court, this application is allowed. Let petitioners above named be 2 enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa, Nalanda, in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 303 of 2005 with conditions as laid down in sub-section (3) of Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as may be applicable and also that one of the bailors shall be a close relation of the petitioners. In case of breach of any of the conditions at any stage to the satisfaction of the concerned court below, it shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioners and take steps for their arrest. S.Ali (J.N. Singh, J.)