IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16152 of 2009 1. BAIDYANATH YADAV S/O LATE ANUP LAL YADAV VILL.- DEBNA, P.O.- THENGAHA, P.S.- SAKATPUR KAMAL, DISTT.- DARBHANGA Versus 1. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER SAKRI BAZAR BRANCH, P.O. & P.S.- SAKRI, DISTT.- DARBHANGA 2. BRANCH MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA, SAKRI BAZAR BRANCH, SAKRI, P.O. & P.S.- SAKRI, DISTT.- DARBHANGA 3. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE DISTRICT AGRICULTURE OFFICER DARBHANGA 4. DISTRICT AGRICULTURE OFFICER DARBHANGA 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER TARDIH, DISTT.- DARBHANGA 6. BLOCK AGRICULTURE OFFICER TARDIH, DISTT.- DARBHANGA ----------- 4 01/02/2010 After some argument learned counsel for the petitioner, in the light of the material which has been brought on record in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents, submits that he would like to thrash out the facts and other disputes by approaching the Bank ombudsman before chalking out the future course of action. This writ application is permitted to be - 2 - withdrawn with the liberty as above without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case of the petitioner or the stand of the Bank. AMIN (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)