IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 39 OF 2011 MR. AMAR SINGH CHAUHAN ,C.P.NO.564/02, PRESENTLY SERVING SENTENCE AT CENTRAL JAIL AGUADA, SINQUERIM, ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Ms. Prema Matker, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. C. A. Ferreira, Public Prosecutor for the respondents. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 25th July, 2011 P.C. Heard Ms. Prema Matker, learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. C. A. Ferreira, learned Public Prosecutor for the respondents. 2. By this petition, petitioner seek to challenge order dated 25.5.2011 by which competent authority has rejected the application for parole for 30 days. Application has been filed primarily on the ground that his wife is seriously ill and she requires attendant. Competent authority has rejected the application on the ground that no emergent situation exits and as such no ground is made out for release of the petitioner on parole. 3. On behalf of the State it has been pointed out that on earlier occasion the petitioner was granted parole and he was released from jail on 21.7.2003, and he did not report back in time and he was arrested on 18.9.2008 and brought back to jail to undergo sentence of rigorous imprisonment of 10 years imposed on him for the offence punishable under section 20(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act. 4. In view of the conduct of the petitioner on earlier occasion, I am not inclined to exercise extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 and/or 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner has been convicted for the offence punishable under NDPS Act which is a serious offence and the petitioner on earlier occasion had misused the liberty granted to him by passing an order granting parole. On this ground alone, I am not inclined to entertain this petition. Hence the petition is dismissed. A. P. LAVANDE, J. vn