1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1449 OF 2006 IN EX.APPLICATION NO.541 OF 2006 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.29 OF 2003 Ashok Leyland Finance Ltd. .. Plaintiffs Versus Ramchandra Venkatrao Varvatte and Anr. .. Defendants Ms.Shakuntala Joshi for claimant None for defendant. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 29th September 2008 P.C. . Heard Ms.Joshi appearing for claimants. She states that affidavit of service has been filed which duly shows that service has been effected on Mr.Ramchandra V. Varvatte who is defendant No.1 borrower. 2. In the light of the provisions of Order V 2 Rule 17 contained in C.P.C. affidavit proving service is accepted. None appears for defendant No.1. Perused the chamber summons and the affidavit in support thereof. There are no denials of the same nor are the contents disputed in any manner. In such circumstances, chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (e). Defendant No.1 is granted four weeks time to file affidavit stating particulars of his property. Needless to state that if there is no compliance with this direction, then, the claimants - original plaintiffs are entitled to apply for further reliefs under Order 22 Rule 41 of C.P.C. or such other reliefs in execution as is permissible in law. Chamber summons is made absolute accordingly. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)