IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 9265 of 2011-G. Decided on: 4th November, 2011. Ram Gopal. … Petitioner. Versus HRTC & others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner : Ms. Suvrata Sood, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers: “(i) That a writ in the nature of certiorari may kindly be issued against the respondents by quashing and setting aside the termination orders of the petitioner. (ii) That a writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued against the respondents to reengage the petitioner as bus sahayak with all consequential benefits or in alternative the respondent No. 3 may kindly be directed to consider the case of the petitioner as sole arbitrator in view of Annexure P-1.” 2. It is submitted that in the case of similarly situated persons, the matters have been referred to Arbitration and the Managing Director is the sole Arbitrator. There will be a direction the Managing Director of the H.R.T.C. to take appropriate action in the case of petitioner herein also in similar proceedings and pass appropriate award in 2 accordance with law, within a period of one month from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner. The petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 4th November, 2011. (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tr) Judge.