IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 178 of 2009 Pradeep Kumar Agarwal …Petitioner. Versus Public Service Tribunal, Uttarakhand and others. …Respondents. Mr. H.S. Dhillon, Advocate for Mr. S.S. Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. D.S. Patni, Advocate for respondent nos. 3 to 5. Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. Khehar, C.J, (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has instructed him to withdraw the instant writ petition. Learned counsel for respondent nos. 3 to 5 states that he has no objection to the withdrawal of the instant writ petition. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 6.4.2010 Rathour