MC 2553/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE I A ANSARI Heard Mr. N. Rajkhowa, learned counsel for the applicants, who are appellants in RSA 101/2011. Also heard Mr. D. Mazumdar, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the respondents-opposite party. Having perused the materials on record and having heard the learned counsel for the parties, the appellants-applicants are hereby allowed to replace the CI shee ts and the wooden frame, on which the CI sheets would be fixed, of the roof of t he Assam-type house, situated on the Suit land, which forms a part of the subjec t-matter of dispute of the Suit. It is, however, made clear that except replace ment of the CI sheets and/or the wooden frame of the roof, on which the CI sheet s would be fixed, no other repairing or renovation shall be carried out by the a ppellants-applicants. As regards any further renovation/repairing, the appellan ts-applicants shall remain at liberty to make such further application, as may b e permissible in law. Mr. D. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the respondents-opposite party, submits tha t, according to the instructions received by him, the appellants-applicants have already collected construction materials and it is likely that the appellants-a pplicants may try to repair/renovate the house, in question. To the submissions , so made, Mr. N. Rajkhowa, learned counsel for the appellants-applicants, submi ts that the appellants-applicants undertake not to cause any renovation/repairin g of the house without obtaining leave of this Court except what has been permit ted by this Court. With the above observations and directions, this Misc. case stands disposed of.