THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI CONTEMPT CASE No. 272 of 2010 Date: 05.07.2010 Between: Sudheer Kumar ..... PETITIONER AND Sri B.Prasad Rao, Managing Director, APSRTC, Musheerabad, Hyderabad and others .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following:- THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI CONTEMPT CASE No. 272 of 2010 O R D E R : This contempt case is filed alleging violation of the order dated 21.12.2009 in W.P.No.17884 of 2009. Heard the learned counsel for both the parties and perused the material available on record including counter affidavit filed by the 4th respondent. The petitioner filed W.P.No.17884 of 2009 seeking a mandamus directing the Managing Director, Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation to appoint a Medical Officer with a direction to issue fresh certificate of fitness to the petitioner after going through the medical record. The said writ petition was disposed of by this Court by order dated 21.12.2009 holding as under: “Heard the learned counsel for both the parties and perused the material available on record as well as the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the Corporation. It is true that the 6th respondent, who is the Medical Officer at A.P.S.R.T.C. Hospital, Tarnaka, Hyderabad, has already issued fit certificate after examining the petitioner. However, having regard to the fact that the petitioner is disputing the same and claims that he is not fit to attend his duties as Conductor, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition with a direction to the respondents 1 and 4 to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 16.6.2009 for getting himself examined through another Medical Officer for determination of his fitness and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. No costs.” A counter affidavit has been filed by the 4th respondent, stating that in compliance with the order of this Court in W.P.No.17884 of 2009, the petitioner was re-examined by Dr.Rajakumar, (Orthopedic) and he was declared unfit for the post of Condutor vide medical certificate dated 11.01.2010. Later a registered letter was addressed to the petitioner by the 3rd respondent on 29.03.2010 to submit his willingness to take further action to provide alternative employment. However, the petitioner did not turn up and did not submit his willingness for the alternative employment. In view of the stand taken by the respondents in the counter affidavit which stood uncontroverted, the allegations made by the petitioner in the contempt case cannot be accepted and therefore, I am not inclined to entertain this contempt case. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is dismissed. No costs. ​ ____________ Date: 05.07.2010 G. ROHINI, J Ivd