THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.19114, 19263 and 19265 of 2011 COMMON ORDER: The petitioners herein were engaged as Junior Lecturers on contract basis by the 3rd respondent at different points of time, to work in various junior colleges within his jurisdiction. Recently, they were discontinued for one reason or the other. Their grievance is that the 3rd respondent is not following Memo, dated 29.06.2011 issued by the Commissioner of Intermediate Education, Hyderabad, 2nd respondent herein in the context of re- engagement of contract lecturers. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents. The Circular was issued by the 2nd respondent stipulating the guidelines to be followed in the context of engaging the junior lecturers on contract basis. Weightage is provided, depending upon the length of service put in by the candidates. The question as to whether the petitioners are entitled for any weightage or whether they deserve to be engaged, needs to be considered by the 3rd respondent, as and when the matter is taken up. Therefore, the writ petitions are disposed of directing that the 3rd respondent shall consider the cases of the petitioners in terms of the Memo, dated 29.06.2011, as and when he intends to engage junior lecturers on contract basis in the subjects concerned. There shall be no order as to costs. __________ 09.09.2011 JSU THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.19114, 19263 and 19265 of 2011 Date: 09.09.2011 JSU