IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 16246 of 2008 Between: Smt. Savalapuram Padma, W/o. Savalapuram Yellam Naidu, R/o. Sundarada Village, Meliaputti Mandal, Srikakulam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palakonda, Srikakulam District. 2 The Tahsildar, Meliaputta Mandal, Srikakulam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction, particularly a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not passing suspension order, suspending the proceedings D.Dis.No. 37/2008 A, dated 12-6-2008 passed by the 2nd respondent herein, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 1st respondent herein to suspend the order by taking up the appeal Rc.No. 1155/08A and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.V.SUBRAMANYA NARASU Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 16246 of 2008 Order: The petitioner states that against the order dated 12.06.2008, passed by the 2nd respondent, namely the Tahsildar, Meliaputti Mandal, Srikakulam District, canceling the house site patta already granted in her favour in respect of the land in question, she filed an appeal, along with application for stay of the order impugned therein, before the 1st respondent, namely the Revenue Divisional Officer, Palakonda, Srikakulam District, on 20.06.2008, but till date, no orders thereon have been passed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and both of them agreed for disposal of the writ petition with the following directions: The 1st respondent, namely the Revenue Divisional Officer, Palakonda, Srikakulam District, is directed to consider and dispose of either the appeal or the stay application filed by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, expeditiously. Till such time, the impugned order dated 12.06.2008, passed by the 2nd respondent- Tahsildar, is stayed. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 28.07.2008 Nsr