^ -"•J3S ^^uw c fi^- _3 ^c^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, CHHATTISGARH WRIT APPEAL NOy^) OF 2007 APPELLANTS / ^. ^ <y RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary Department of Urban & Rural Development, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Director General, Town & Country Planning, R.D.A. Building, Near Shahstri Chowk, Raipur (C.G.) The Deputy Director, Town & Country Planning, Regional Office, Durg (C.G.) Versus ^ 1. Gautam Bhuddha Agrawal, S/o Shri Ramkrishna Agrawal, Aged about 54 years, R/o Village - Kumhari, Tehsil & District Durg (C.G.) ^ 2. Municipal Council Kumhari, through its Chief Municipal ^' Officer, Kumhari, District Durg (C.G.) C-^cfcy^ _^ ^^ WRIT APPEAL UNDERfi^sE '2,~SUB RULE 1" OF THE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT^^£§,2006^ '5;J t)^ HI^H COURT OF CHHATTIS^^H AT BILASPUR &IVISION BENCH: HON'BLE SHRI I.M.QUb&USI & HON'BLE SHRI N.SC A^ARWAL, JJ. APPELLANT RESPON&ENTS WRIT APPEAl. N0.49/2007 State of C.6. &, Others Vs 6<2utam Bhuddha Agra^al & another Presents j AAr. M,P<5< Bhatia, Dy. 6overnment Advocate for the appeliant. Miss Morisa Khatri, Advocate for the respondent No*l. ORALJUDeMENT (Passed on 30th Juns, 2010) I.M. Quddusi, J; .1. Heard. 2. The writ appelbnt has filed this writ appeal against the impugned order dated 9.1.2007 passed by the learned Sjngle Judge in W.P. No.648/2006. 3. During the course of hearing/kamed counseJ for respondent NoJ-^autam Bhuddha Agrawa! states that the property in question has been sold by the respondent NoJ, 4. Learned Singie Judge had given direction that the respondentNo,! herein shaJJ make a representation.to.the State &ov€mnrient in respect of the property in question, but as 1tse land has been sold hy respondent No,l there is no question of impiementation of that direction. 5. In that view of the matter, nothing remains in the writ appeal for adjudication and accordingly, the instant writ appeal is di'sposed of. No orderas to co^ts. Sd/- ^.M.Quddusi Judge Sd/- N. K.Agarwal Judge JtOs^-l"