IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 20TH OCTOBER 2008 / 28TH ASWINA 1930 RP.No. 1095 of 2008(E) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.23776/2008 Dated 03/09/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -------------------------------------------- K.V. SAJU, S/O. VARGHESE, KADAPARAMBIL HOUSE, MALAYIDAMTHURUTH. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------------------ 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.A.J.VARGHESE THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== R.P.No.1095 OF 2008 IN W.P.(C) NO. 23776 OF 2008 (E) ==================== Dated this the 20th day of October, 2008 O R D E R The review of the judgment in WP(C) No.23776/08 is sought for. The writ petition was dismissed on the ground that a modified proposal as ordered by the STAT in Ext.P2 judgment was not made by the petitioner within the time allowed. It is now pointed out that the modified proposal was submitted within the time and that the same was received by the Secretary, RTA by numbering the same as 4404 in the Inward Register dated 11/6/2008. In view of this factual assertion, I am satisfied that the submission made by the learned Government Pleader on the basis of which the writ petition was dismissed is erroneous. Review petition is therefore allowed and the judgment is recalled. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp