IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-13187 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 05.12.2011 Rajesh Kumar Bhagat ....Petitioner Versus Union Territory of Chandigarh and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. K.S. Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sukant Gupta, Addl. P.P., U.T., Chandigarh. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the parties have stated that matter has been amicably settled. Since offence punishable under Section 420 IPC can be compounded with the permission of the Court under Section 320 (2) Cr.P.C., therefore an appropriate application shall be moved before the Magistrate seeking compounding of the offence. Hence petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Dismissed as withdrawn. However, parties shall move an application seeking compounding of the offence under Section 320(2) Cr.P.C. before the trial Court. Trial Court is expected to pass appropriate order thereon. (Alok Singh) Judge December 05, 2011 R.S.