1 IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4200 FO 2009 IN APPEAL (LODG)NO.737 OF 2009 IN COURT RECEIVER REPORT NO.118 OF 2007 @ COURT RECEIVER REPORT NO.69 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.993 OF 1997. Saifuddin Alibhai Lakdawala ...Appellant Vs. 1.Kutubuddin Alibhai Lakdawala & ors. ...Respondents. --- Ms.Rani S.Chavan, for Appellant. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & R.V.MORE,JJ. DATED: 3rd May, 2010 P.C.: 1. The respondents are served, they are not appearing. No reply is filed. Notice of motion is granted in terms of prayer clause (a). (D.K.DESHMUKH,J.) (R.V.MORE,J.) 2 IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL (LODG)NO.737 OF 2009 IN COURT RECEIVER REPORT NO.118 OF 2007 @ COURT RECEIVER REPORT NO.69 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.993 OF 1997. Saifuddin Alibhai Lakdawala ...Appellant Vs. 1.Kutubuddin Alibhai Lakdawala & ors. ...Respondents. --- Ms.Rani S.Chavan, for Appellant. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & R.V.MORE,JJ. DATED: 3rd May, 2010 P.C.: 1. Heard. In the impugned order, the learned Single Judge has not decided any issue finally. Observations have been made by him for the purpose of issuing directions on the Receiver s report. Therefore, any observations made in the order are relevant for that purpose only, they will not come in the way of the party approaching the appropriate 3 Court for establishing their right. This position has also been made clear by the learned Single Judge in the order. In our opinion, therefore, it will not be appropriate for this Court to interfere with the order. The appeal is, therefore, rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J.) (R.V.MORE,J.)