1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.668 OF 2004 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.117 OF 2002 IN SUIT NO.2335 OF 1994 M/s.Ambika Stores & Others .. Appellants. V/s. Shree Arihand Apartment Co-op.Hsg. Society Ltd. & Others .. Respondents. Mr.Samir Vaidya for the appellants. Mr.R.S. Jaisinghani i/b. Bharat Mehta for respondent No.1 Mr.Basant Trilokani for respondent Nos.2 and 3. CORAM : R.M. LODHA, & CORAM : R.M. LODHA, & CORAM : R.M. LODHA, & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 20TH OCTOBER, 2004. DATED : 20TH OCTOBER, 2004. DATED : 20TH OCTOBER, 2004. P.C. : Heard. 2. This appeal is not bonafide. The impugned order came to be passed on the statement and the undertaking given on behalf of present appellant Nos.2 and 3 herein (respondent Nos.3 and 4 therein) who were present in the Court. Having given undertaking before the learned single Judge the present appellants have taken somersault and are 2 trying to make out a misconceived case that the undertaking was given under compelling circumstances. 3. The appeal does not deserve to be entertained. Dismissed in limine. (R.M. LODHA, J.) (R.M. LODHA, J.) (R.M. LODHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)