IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7183 of 2011 BASUKI YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 06.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. It would appear from perusal of the FIR that informant raised suspicion against petitioner and one Hullo Yadav. Admittedly, the aforesaid Hullo Yadav has already been granted bail by another bench of this Court, and so far as petitioner is concerned, nothing has been mentioned specific against him in the impugned order of the learned court below. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that in course of investigation, not a single witness has stated about the involvement of the petitioner in the alleged crime and not only informant but other witnesses have also raised only suspicion against him in course of investigation. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Basuki Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge cum Fast Track Court No.-Vth, Bhagalpur in connection with S.T. No.37/2011 arising out of Pirpainti P.S. Case No.20 of 2001. PN (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)