IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6651 of 2007 MAHESH CHANDRA RAI Versus RAJENDRA AGRUCULTURAL UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- 11. 03/02/2009 This writ application was filed primarily with a grievance that although pay scale of the petitioner was revised in the scale of Rs.6500- 10500 but the same had not been given effect to. Now, counter affidavit and supplementary counter affidavit have been filed by the respondent University. From Annexure-A to the supplementary counter affidavit, it appears that the said scale has been taken into account for fixation of pension and family pension of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in that view of the matter, he has no further grievance against the respondents, and therefore, he does not press this writ application. In the circumstances, in view of fixation of pension of the petitioner taking into account pay scale claimed by the petitioner, this writ application is disposed of. However, if any amount becomes due on account of such fixation and if the same has not been paid, petitioner will be at liberty to file representation for - 2 - the same before the authorities of the University, which shall be considered by the authorities of the University and if any amount is found due, the same shall be paid to the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. Pradeep/ (J. N. Singh, J.)