: 1 : USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1129 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.666 OF 2009 Raju B. Padvai .. Plaintiff V/s. Sanju B. Padvai and Ors. .. Defendants ..... Ms. Prachi Khandge i/by M.P. Vashi & Associates for the plaintiff None for the defendants ..... CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 18th AUGUST, 2009. P.C. : 1. None appeared on behalf of the defendants when an order was passed on 22 nd April, 2009. However, it appears that affidavit in reply is filed on 1 st August, 2009 but it is placed under objection. The objections are not removed. Advocate for the defendants is absent although his name is appearing on the Board. After perusing the plaint and the annexures thereto so also ad-interim order and the reply affidavit which is under objection, I am of the opinion that no prejudice will be caused if this motion is made absolute in terms of the ad-interim order dated 22 nd April, 2009. It is accordingly made absolute with no order as to costs. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)