IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 7TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 16TH KARTHIKA 1930 W.P(C).No. 32884 of 2008(M) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ T.A.SUKUMARAN, S/O.THAYYIL ARUMUGHAM, AGED 59 YEARS, THAYYIL HOUSE, VASANTH NAGAR, PATTURAIKKAL THIRUVAMBADY, THRISSUR-680002. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI. 3. THE CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION SHIKSHA KENDRA, 2-COMMUNITY CENTRE PREET VIHAR, NEW DELHI-110 092. 4. THE PRINCIPAL, SALSABEEL CENTRAL SCHOOL, MUNDUR, P.O.PERAMANGALAM, THRISSUR-680 545. GOVT. PLEADER, SRI. A.J. VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 32884 OF 2008 (M) ==================== Dated this the 7th day of November, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner states that making allegations against the 4th respondent that they have obtained No Objection Certificate from the 1st respondent by misrepresenting facts, they have filed Ext.P5 before the 1st respondent. It is stated that no action has been taken on Ext.P5. It is with this complaint the writ petition is filed. All that is prayed for by the petitioner is that the 1st respondent should be directed to take action on Ext.P5. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, Ext.P5 has been made and has been received, necessarily it is for the 1st respondent to take action thereof with notice to the 4th respondent. This the 1st respondent shall do, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 3 months of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp