C?) IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P. (s1 NOEL MS? OF 201 1 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE LIKE NATURE. PETITIONER Chhaya Sharma, aged about 46 years, D/o Shri J.R. Sharma, Occupation- Assistant Professor, Government College of Education, Bilaspur, R/o B-37, Nature City, Sakri, District Bilaspur (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS :- 1. State .of Chhattisgarh, through 'Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. - Bhavan Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). 2. District Education Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 3. Director Public Instructions, Pension Bada, Raipur (C.G.). 4. Joint Director, Treasury Audit 8a Accounts, Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. Principal, Government College of Education, (Unnat Adhyayan Shiksha Sansthan) , Tarbahar, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 4-10—78 n ; . w‘fé) M ##Kbg WW 200 mm (Wu) Mumffww Wafam %af%ma¥%$1 . SB : Hon’ble Shrl Manlndra Mohan hrivastava J. 99-1 2-2011 é ’ i ShriRahuiBirthare,counse|fo the petitioner. ‘ -ShrivN.NVah'a Roy, Panel Lawy r for the State. Heard. ‘ Learned copnsei appearing foiv the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to benem of two advance increments on account of she having passed B.Ed. examination at her own cost. It is submitted that the issue involved in the present'petition is no longer res int a and the same has been finaiiy decided by the Hon’bie Supreme Court in the ca e of Asha Saxena vs. State of MP. & Ors., 2009 (iii) MPJR (SC) 59. He submi s that in View of this judgment besides many others, the petitioner may be permitte to withdraw this petition with iiberty to make representation before the concerned uthority, raising aii her grievances. Counsei for the petitioner also craves for a d rection to the competent authority to decide the said representation as expeditiou iy as possibie. Learned counsei for the State also assures that representation if any made by the petitioner, shall be decided in ccordance with iaw, as early as possible. Accordingly‘ the petition is dis issed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. However, if the petitioner makes a r presentation within one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the competent authority shail decide the same within a further period of two months rom the date of its receipt in accordance with law. Sd/- ,rManindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge Deepii