IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH LPA No. 1112 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 03, 2011 Sanjeev Kumar …Appellant Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present: None for the appellant. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, Acg. CJ. 1. The matter has been called out twice but learned counsel for the appellant has not appeared nor there is any receipt placed on record to show that the appellant had deposited ` 5 lacs in compliance with order dated 16.08.2011. It is pertinent to mention that on depositing the aforesaid amount, notice was to be issued to respondent No.4 and if deposit was not made then the appeal was to stand dismissed. 2. In view of the fact that neither learned counsel for the appellant has appeared nor there is any indication on record that the amount has been deposited. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed. 4. Keeping in view the dismissal of appeal, no orders are required to be passed on the application seeking condonation of delay of 8 days in filing of the appeal. (M.M. KUMAR) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (RAJIV NARAIN RAINA) JUDGE November 03, 2011 Atul