IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34906 of 2010 KARI PANDIT & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 16.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel for the State. Petitioners are in-laws of the deceased who died in mysterious circumstances at the house of these petitioners. Admittedl, after due investigation police submitted final form finding mistake of fact but subsequently learned C.J.M. took the cognizance. Although learned counsel for State submits that in the course of investigation, several witnesses have supported the prosecution case, but considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, I think it proper to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to petitioners. Accordingly, petitioners, namely, (1) Kari Pandit, (2) Kamlesh Pandit and (3) Ram Dulari Devi, in the event of arrest/surrender within 30 days from the date of communication of this order to the concerned court in connection with Singhiya P.S. Case No.115 of 2005, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Rosera, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. PN/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)