IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.15110 of 2011 Date of Decision : August 18, 2011. Vikas Bhardwaj .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.M.S.Sachdev, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is a Superintendent in the Co-operative Department, Government of Punjab. He impugns his transfer from Jalandhar to Ropar. He alleges that the impugned order shall cause extreme hardship to him. In my considered view, the transfer being an incidence of service, no interference with the impugned order is called for by this Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction. However, keeping in view the fact that the petitioner has highlighted some mitigating circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation for his re-transfer to Jalandhar or at some nearby place. If CWP No.15110 of 2011 [2] any such representation is made, it is directed that the Competent Authority shall consider the same sympathetically and in accordance with Rules. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. August 18, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE