[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.1166 OF 2007 Pratap Bhanudas Tele ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... Mr.H.S.Venegavkar Advocate for Applicant Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : APRIL 9, 2007 DATE : APRIL 9, 2007 DATE : APRIL 9, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No. 105 of 2006 of Sangola Police Station. The said case is mainly under Section 302 of IPC. 3. The learned A.P.P. on instructions from the I.O. Mr. Prashant Sampte, A.P.I. of Sangola Police Station who is present in Court, states that the trial is almost over i.e. the evidence of witnesses has been recorded and now the case is kept for recording statements of accused under [-2-] Section 313 of Cr.P.C. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to grant bail to the applicant at this stage. 4. Application is rejected. However, in case the trial is not over within a period of one month from today, the liberty is granted to the applicant to prefer a fresh application for bail. 5. Application is disposed of. [ V.K.Tahilramani, J.]