THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33505 of 2010 Dated 31.03.2011 Between: Narsing Rao …Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by the Secretary, Hyderabad and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: None appeared Counsel for respondents: -- The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “….to issue a writ or order/s more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order dated 8-9- 2010 in proceedings no.Rc.688/2007-B passed by the second respondent, and the consequential action of the fourth respondent in admitting the respondents no.6 to 22 as members of the third respondent society, as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional; and be pleased to pass such other order/s…” On 23.02.2011, the case was adjourned as there was no representation for the petitioner. Even today, when the case is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. It is, therefore, reasonable to presume that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing his cause in the writ petition. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.42482 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 31st March, 2011 GHN