IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 10TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 21ST MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 34370 of 2007(N) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- DR. S. BEENA, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR (PLANT PATHOLOGY), COLLEGE OF HORTICULTURE, VELLANIKKARA, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.JAYACHANDRAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION COMMISSIONER, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE REGISTRAR, KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY POST, VELLANIKKARA, THRISSUR. 3. THE COMPTROLLER, KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY POST, VELLANIKKARA, THRISSUR. R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE. R2 & R3 BY ADV. SRI.K.P.MUJEEB, SC, KERALA AGRI. UTY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/02/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs WP(C) NO. 34370/2007-N APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE ORDER NO.GA/C2/23346/99 (177) DATED 24/01/2005. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE ORDER NO.GA/C2/29151/06 DATED 23/05/2007. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE ORDER NO.GA/C2/35758/04 (AG-105) DATED 04/09/2007. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: EXT.R1: COPY OF THE MODIFIED ORDER DATED 20/11/2008. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.34370/2007-N ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 10th day of February, 2011 J U D G M E N T On agreement of parties, the writ petition is being disposed of. The petitioner approached this Court seeking for various reliefs including a direction to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to grant the pay scale of Rs.12000-18300/- with effect from 20/07/1999. Further directions have also been sought for. 2. By interim order dated 21/11/2007, this Court directed the University to pay the salary and allowances to the petitioner at the pre-revised rate, provisionally until further orders. When the matter came up for hearing on 08/02/2011, the learned counsel for the petitioner pointed out that the interim order has not been complied with so far and, accordingly, this Court directed the University to state reasons for not complying with the interim order and also to state how and in what manner the amounts received from I.C.A.R and the Government for disbursement under the U.G.C Scheme 1996 have been spent. The matter was re- W.P.(C). No.34370/2007 -:2:- posted as requested for by the learned Standing Counsel for the University. 3. The learned Standing Counsel for the University submitted that the interim order was never communicated to the University and it is only in the said circumstances, further action got delayed. It is further pointed out that immediately on passing of the interim order dated 08/02/2011 steps have been taken in the matter and it will be seen that the entire monetary benefits are disbursed to the petitioner within a period of ten days. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the interim order was communicated. But, I am not going into the said controversy in the light of the fact that the petitioner will be disbursed the entire amounts within a period of ten days as submitted by the learned Standing Counsel for the University. Therefore, there will be a direction to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to disburse the eligible benefits to the petitioner including the arrears within W.P.(C). No.34370/2007 -:3:- a period of ten days from today. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms