{1g gg07/ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF HCHHATTISGARH AT BILAsPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. ‘71 3% OF 2009 PETITIONERS / 1. Smt. Saroj Salam W/O Shri Raju Salam, aged about 44 years, Occupation— Service as a Arogya Sahayika (Dai) at Mahatma Gandhi Adivasi Kanya Ashram, Chhindgarh, District— Dantewada, (C.G.) Sukhnath Karma, S/O Mukka , Ram Karma, aged about 43 i, years, Occupation— Lower Division Teacher, at Balak Ashram Sonakookanar, District Dantewada, (C.G.) Bharat Nishad S/o Kaluram Nishad, aged about 44 years, Occupation—Service posted at Assistant Teacher at Jaskarra, Charama, Distt. V Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS {w 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary,Tribal Welfare Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, District— Raipur, (C.G.) ,,_— 2. The Commissioner, Tribal Welfare and Development, Raipur, District— Raipur, (C.G.) §g$\\‘>g\. ’ § HEGH CQURT OF CHEATuSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETETION i8) No. 7124 of 2009 Smt Saroj Salam & Othars. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. PETETIONERS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF TNDIA. SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Prasent: Shri Awadh Tripathi, Advocate for tho petitioners. Shri M.?.S.Bhatia, Deputy Govornment Advocate for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed onW 04 dayvof December, 2009) With the consent of learne§ counsel for the patties, the matter is heard finally. . Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered in Smt. ALall v. State of Chhattt‘sgarh 5% Others’, thus the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to decide their case in the light of aforestated decision, sub} eet to verification asto whether the respondent No. 4—histitute is a Government Aided school and the petitioners are the teachers within the sanctioned strength. Leamed counsel appearing for the State/respondents 1 to 3 submits that in the event, the petitioners make a representation, the same Wili he considered and decided, in accordance with iew, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt ofthe representation. In View of foregoing, according to the iearned counsel appearing for the petitioners, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4‘ Aeoordingiy, the writ petition is disposed of. if i ‘ l 8d]. i I; P5 he } j SatishK. Agn‘iimtrs 7 i - ‘ " :Jiidge. 1 2907 (1:: BLJ 265 i