?561f:B c ^l ^/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.1 WRIT PETITION N0. 1 '2-2-^/2006 PETITIONER 4-^ /^^ Af/ ^..-•'^•' .•••' ~.<^< .. •~>~\-''»</?-p.••'' .^A^y/ ^y/^y/ A^y ^' <:-V RESPONDENTS : ^^L^ Smt. Mangla Sharma Wife of Shri B. P. Sharma, aged about 56 years, Posted as Superintendent of Girls Observation Home, Rajnandgaon (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Social Welfare D.K.S Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Director, Panchayat and Social Welfare Department, Mahanadi Khand, Mantralaya Parisar, Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUnQN OF INDIA r'^ 1 :3&??°®^S?4;; ?;%'^^'^"'^ai ' » y ' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 1227 of 2006 Petitioncr Smt Mangla Sharma Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & another 1. SIa^e Bench : HonTsle Mr. Justice Satish K. Agaihotri, Shri Sandeep Dubey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Deputy Govenuneut Advocate for the Respondents. v . ORAL ORDER ( 25dl March, 2006) The foUowing order of the Court was passed by Satish K. AgnUiotri, J. Leamed coimsel for the petitioner submits that fhe petitioner is working as Siiperintendent Observation Hoine at Rajnandgaou. Accordiag to fhe petitioner ia the gradation list of ProbatiDn Officer/Case Worker/District Auditor/Research Assistent dated 1.4.2000 fhe name of the petitioner was at Srl. No. 6. Thereafter ia the gradation list dated l.4.2004 the name of the petitioner was at Srl. No.2. To fhe utter surprise ofthe petitioner in the gradation Ust of 5.8.2005 (Annexurc P/6) fhe name of the petitioner is placed at Srl. No.2, The petitioner has made several representations dated l.9.2005 (Aunexurc P/7), 12.9.2005 (Aanexure P/8) aud Annexure P/9. The respoudeuts have not paid any heed to her representatioas. Leamed couusel for fhe petitioner at this stage submits that fhe petitioner confines her subiaission to the prayer No. 7.3 inade in fhe petition, to which learned counsel for the respondents has no objection. 2. i»:"sa; AM-"i'S^^"KS,w;'S^^;^^2S^ y Thakufc 3. Accordingty, the petition is allowed. The icspondents are directed to coasider and decide fhc representations, as stated above, in accordanee with law, within a period of six weeks fix>m thc date of receipt/pioduction ofacopy ofttus order. No order as to costs. Certified copy, as per Rides. SatishK.Agmhotri Judge