IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13640 of 2009 SUNIL KUMAR UPADHAYA SON OF RAJDEO UPADHAYA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE FARDPUR,P.S.NAUBATPUR,DISTT.PATNA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 7.8.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner seeks bail in Naubatpur P.S.Case No. 131 of 2003 (Sessions Trial No. 1064 of 2007) which has been registered for offences under Section 302 and some other Sections of the Indian Penal Code. Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner has been rejected thrice by different orders of this Court. It appears from the earlier rejection order that it was the petitioner who delayed the trial by not cross-examining the prosecution witness. A report regarding stage of trial was called for which has been received. From the report it appears that two prosecution witnesses have been examined and six witnesses are yet to be examined. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to re-consider the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is again rejected. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)