IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6931 of 2009 JAY @ JAI KUMAR YADAV @ BHADOKHAN YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 1.5.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in a police case under bailable Sections of the Penal Code read with Section 27 of the Arms Act. The allegation is that he pointed a pistol on the informant for compromising a case and with his accomplices indulged in firing to terrorize. Learned Counsel for the State points out from the impugned order that the petitioner has criminal antecedent of more than one case and has earlier also resorted to intimidating witnesses. Let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.45,000/- (Forty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in Sikarahata P.S. case No. 10 of 2000. Both the bailors must be his mother and father respectively, whose photographs and proof of residence must be appended to the bail bonds. The petitioner shall be required to be physically present on each date fixed in the trial. Considering his undertaking this Court considers it proper to direct that during the pendency of the trial he shall report on each alternate Monday at 11 A.M. before the Officer-in-Charge of - 2 - Sikarahata Police Station. If he violates any of the two conditions the Court below shall be at liberty to deal with him appropriately in accordance with law, notwithstanding the present order. (Navin Sinha,J.) A.Kumar