HIGH CQURT QE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPU CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1117/ 1991 Q APPEAL UNDER SECTION 377 (1) CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE 1973 FGR 1?;NTIAI1CE1‘V1ENT OF SENTENCE. 21 Criminal appeal and judgment dated 24/8/91 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dantewada in on'minal case No. 1109/87 perused. 3, Vide judgment impugned learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dantewada has convicted the respondent of the charge Sections 148, 324/ 149, 506—B, 294 of the Indian Penal Code on his admission and release him under probation in termsiof Section 3 of the Probation of Offenders Act. In the present case age of the responadent was 19 years at the time of commission of crime. The dispute arose on behalf of seat at the time of watching film. No previous antecedents of the respondent has been shown by the appellant. Considering the causal nature of the offence and age of the respondent, I do not flnd any ground for enhancement of the sentence or interference in the judgment extending the benefit of probation to the respondent. Consequently, this criminal @appeal is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. ‘ Sd/— T. P. Sharma Judge 4V R APPELLANT The State of Madhya Pradesh. Versus RESPONDENT Banti @ Akshay Kumar son of Aashu— (ACCUSED) tosh Lal, aged about 19 yéars, r/o Type 3 No. 53, P0]iC€ Station: Kirandul, District: Bastar, (M.P.). 1* . (SB Hen’ble Mr T.P Sharma, J ) D“€S€nt — Shrl Rakesh Jha Dy G A for the State/appellant { None tor the respondent ORAL- JUDGEMENT (Passed an 27/07/20 10) 1. Heard.