1 wvsLs r»®c Cf-'/'zra INJ'HE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^^0 / 2007 PETITIONER c^ ^° RESPONDENTS ..•\ *.c<?' ..-•'Vv'" \^^> ^<'^"/ t^'^- %?y /-•;.y5J ^.y^ <t.^••' <f:' ,^ . ^ ^:. -^Subheram Dewangan S/o Sukalu Dewangan Aged about 48 years R/o village Pipla kachar P.0- Pandadah, Tehsil- Khairagarh Dist- Rajnandgoan (C.G) Versus 4. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G) Engineerin Chief PWD, Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G) Superintendent Engineer PWD, Durg Mandal Dist- Durg Executive Engineer PWD (B&R), Sub-Division Office, Khairagarh Dist- Rajnandgoan. (C.G) y 5. Sub-Divisional Officer ^ PWD (B&R), Sub-Division Office, Khairagarh (C.G) ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA_EOR_lSaUANCE QF A SUITABLE WRIT ORDER OF DIRECTION TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. -'c^u-^Q-i"u=t+itiai"i ^L' HI6H COURT OF CHHATTISeARH AT BILASPUR W. P. fsl No. 590 of 2007 Petitioner : Subherom tSewon9an Versus Re^ondaits : Sta-te of Chhatt-iS9arh & others SB: Hon'bfe Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J Present: Mr. H.S. Ahluwalkx, Advocate for ihe pe-tittoner. AAs. Sunita Jain, Pcmel kn»yerfor the reqaondents/State. OR&ER fl>assed on this 31st ttay of Jonuary, Z007) 1. Leonwd counsel appearmg for Ihe petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointty submit that -the facts of the present writ petition are simitar to •thot of in W. P. No. 454/2005 (Ram Praaid Yaday & others vs. State of Chhatti^arh & others), which was allowed vide order dated 4.1.2(X)7. They further submit that the question of taw involved is atso -the same. 2. Zn view of the above-stated aibmissions made by leamed counal \ for the part-ies, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order dated 4.i.2007 passed by this Court in W. P. No. 454/2006 VRam Prusoid Yadav & others vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others). No order as to costs. Bablu Sd/- SatisJi K. Agi Judge