IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.10891 of 2008 Sri Narain Pandit Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 2. 29.07.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner has filed the present writ application for quashing the order dated 27.03.2008 passed by the Circle Officer, Balia in Land Encroachment Case No. 01 of 2007 as contained in Annexure-7. The final notice for removing encroachment from plot no.2017 appertaining to Thana No. 627 of village- Balia in the district of Begusarai, as contained in Anexure-8, has also been challenged. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the land in question is the raiyati land of the petitioner. Moreover, the petitioner is privileged person and no evidence was allowed to lead by authorities before passing the impugned order. Let the petitioner file an appeal under the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act when the appellate authority will consider to condone limitation in filing 2 the appeal due to pendency of the writ application before this Court. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that still the petitioner is residing in the residential house as the impugned order has not been given effect till date. If the residential house of the petitioner has not been disturbed till date then it will not be disturbed till filing of appeal. It is needless to say that since the residential house of the petitioner situated at the land in question the appellate authority will consider to stay of operation of the impugned order. It is expected from the authorities concerned to dispose off the appeal within a period of six months. With the above observation, this writ application is disposed off. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)