... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1948 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.1948 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.1948 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri Nitin P.Deshpande for the Applicant. Shri S.R.Shinde, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : AUGUST 18, 2006. : AUGUST 18, 2006. : AUGUST 18, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocate appearing for the Applicant. Perused the impugned Judgment and Order. Prima facie, it appears to me that the learned Magistrate has not considered the legal effect of Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Leave to prefer Appeal is granted. Appeal is admitted. Call for Record and Proceedings. Hearing is expediated. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE