IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.403 of 2008 MUKUL RAI @ NIRAJ KUMAR @ NIRAJ KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 21.7.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. In the instant writ application the petitioner prays for commanding the respondents to make further investigation under section 173(8) of the Cr.P.C. in view of Annexure-2 which is Memo No.244 dated 6.3.2005 addressed to the D.G.P., Bihar, Patna. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the investigation in this case was not carried out in its true perspective and much was desired. He submits that the persons who are really involved in this case have not been brought to book. In this respect he relies upon the aforesaid Memo No.244 dated 6.3.2005 of the I.G. ,Muzaffarpur range to the D.G.P., Bihar, Patna. In the last paragraph of his Memo the I.G., Muzaffarpur range, observed that much is desired still in the investigation. He submits that he has not proceeded in the right course. The learned counsel for the State submits that in the instant case charge sheet has been submitted way back in March, 2003. Having heard the respective submissions of the learned counsels this Court finds that the letter of I.G., Muzaffarpur Range, Muzaffarpur casts shadow on the manner in which investigation proceeded in this case . In the facts of the case the petitioner would produce a copy of the letter of I.G., Muzaffarpur Range, along with a copy of this order to D.G.P., Bihar, Patna who would pass an appropriate order whether any further investigation is required under section 173 (8) of the Cr.P.C. in - 2 - view of the aforesaid letter of I.G., Muzaffarpur Range, preferably within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the aforesaid observations this writ application is disposed of. AnilK.sinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)