IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.37937 of 2009 MAHANGU MUSAHAR @ BULAKI MUSAHAR, SON OF GHAGARU MUSAHAR, R/O VILLAGE – Kudhani, P.S. Kudhani, Distt. – Kaimur at Bhabua …………………………... Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …………..…. OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioner:- Mr. Tribhuwan Narain, Advocate. For the State;- Mr. R.P.S. Singh, A.P.P. ---------- 3. 16.12.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Section 382 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the allegation in the first information report, some jewelry including a licensed gun was looted from the house of informant. It is submitted on behalf the petitioner that Section 414 I.P.C. has been added since there has been alleged recovery from the house of the petitioner. It is also stated that the police had recovered some articles forcibly from the house of the petitioner. Petitioner is stated to be of clean antecedent. Learned counsel for the State submitted that there has been recovery of several stolen articles from the possession of the petitioner, which have been put to 2 T.I.Parade and the informant and his family members had identified those articles. Having regards to the fact that the stolen articles had been recovered from the possession of the petitioner as also those articles had been identified by the informant and his family members, I am not inclined to grant bail to this petitioner for the present. This application is dismissed at this stage. However, petitioner shall be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completion of six months from today. dk ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J. )