THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.23265 of 2011 Dated 28th September, 2011 Between: S.Samiulla …Petitioner And The Commissioner & Director of Municipal Administration, A.P., Hyderabad and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri N.Aswarthanarayana Counsel for respondent No.1: AGP for Municipal Administration Counsel for respondent Nos.2 & 3: Sri C.Venkat Yadav The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to set aside proceedings, dated 30.06.2011, issued by respondent No.3, whereby the work order for construction of disposal drain from Hindu burial ground culvert to Christian burial ground at bypass road was issued in favour of respondent No.4. The grievance of the petitioner, who is a Councillor of Hindupur Municipality, is that even though administrative sanction was given by the Government for construction of drainage in Nallappa layout, the impugned proceedings were issued authorising construction of drainage from a different point. The petitioner filed a copy of the agenda, wherein item No.3 relates to the subject of construction of drainage from Hindu burial ground at Nallappa layout upto Bypass road. According to the petitioner, there is pressing need for construction of drainage in Nallappa layout. That instead of constructing the drainage at that place, the same is proposed at a difference place between Hindu burial ground and Christian burial ground. Even though counter affidavit is not filed, Sri C.Venkat Yadav, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3, filed a photocopy of the resolution of the Municipal Council, which shows the work relating to construction of drainage from Hindu burial ground at Nallappa layout to Christian burial ground at bypass road. From this resolution, it is evident that the impugned proceedings under which the work is entrusted to respondent No.4 is in consonance with the Council’s resolution. If the petitioner feels aggrieved by the Council’s resolution, he is entitled to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law. So long as the work sought to be executed is inconsonance with the resolution of the Municipal Council, the impugned proceedings cannot be invalidated. For the above-mentioned reasons, I do not find any merit in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed, however, with liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy, if he feels aggrieved by non-provision of drainage in Nallappa layout. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.28485 of 2011 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 28th September, 2011 VGB