•^ -^. >' IN_THE,HIGHCgURTOFCHHATTES&ARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETCTCON (S) NOfi.O^&OF 2011 PETmQNER Fai Kumar Patanwar S/o. Shri Khonjhu Ra Patonwar, aged about 40 years, Upper Division Teacher, 6ovt. Middle School, Murii, Jan Shiksha Kendra Boida, Biock Paii, bistt. Korba (C.G.) RESPgNbENTS VERSUS 1. ^" ^/ ^' ^A^ .,. ,./''.-•••""°' ^y' 3. ^ State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tribal Weifare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner, Triba! Weifare bepartment, Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner, Tn'ba! Welfare Department, Korba :^^. 4. ^ Block Education Officer, Biock Pa!i. Distt. Korba (CG) ^ 5. Joint birector, Treasury, accounts, pension, Bilaspur bistrict Bilaspur (C.G.) V^RIT PETITION UNDER_ARTICLE 225 OF THE CONSTETUTION OF INDIA ^ HIGH COURT OP CHHATTI80ARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON'BLB MR. JUSTICB PRITINKBR DIWAKBR PETITIONBRS RE8PONDBNT8 W.P.tSl.WO. 6033/2011 Jai Kumar Pataowar versus State ofC.G. & Ofhers Shri Amit Kumar Sharma, counsel for the petitioner, Shri N. Naha Roy, P.L. for fhe State. WRIT PBTITION UNDBR ARTICLB 226 OP THB CONSTITUTION OF IWDIA ORDBR (12.10.2011) Counsel for fhe petitioner submits that his case is covered wifh the case of Asha Saxena Vs. State of M.P. & Ors. 2009 (III)MP*m (SC) 59 for grant of two advaace mcrements as fhe petitioner has done B.Ed. He submits fhat he may be permitted to withdtaw fhis petition wifh Uberty to make representatlon aad ia tum direction inay be issued to ffcie respondents to consider fhe case of the petitioner ia accordaace wifh law. State counsel poiats out that so far as the Tribal department is conceraed tUl date no such circular has been issued and fhtereforc the petitioner is not entifled for the benefit oftwo advaace iacrements as per the decision ofthe Suprexne Court in. Asha Saxena (supra). Be fhat as it iiiay, ia the eventuality of niaking aiiy such representation by the petitioner, it is expected fhat the saiae would be decided as expeditiously as possible iii accordaiice with law. It is siiade clear fhat fhis court has not expressed aay opinion on fhe xaerits of fhe case aad the auttionty conceraed woiild be at Mberty to decide fhe representation stdcfly in accoidaaCT; witfa law. Sd/- pritinkerDiwaker Judge