c^-i ^ gingle Sench 5 ^\c/\ .^>-"^,s^;-""^> ^•^e*^ 'yiesei*6' ^••- ^•1;"' v^>1-" Bhardwaj, Aged about 56 years, S/o Shn' Sadhram, Head r- Block Malkharod, Distt. Champa (C.6.) 1. State of Chhattisgarh School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.&.) 2. District Education Officer District Janjqir-Champa (C.6. 3. Joint Di r- ^—- Anuiraia Bhsu'dwi State ofC.G. & Others Shri K.K-Paiidey, soiuisel for tjie petitioner. Shri Pravecn Das, Dy. G.A. for fhe State. (16.08.2012.) Grievance of fhe petitioner in the present petition is that fbe petitioner was appointed as Deputy Tcacb.er on a fixed pay scale of Rs. 150 for a period of two yea.rs and. after coinpletion of pi'oba'.ioit, he was granted regular pay scale of Rs, 169-300. Contention of tbc coi.msel for the petitioaer is fhat he is entitled tbr reguiar pay scale with effect irom the date of ioitial appom;tKieat asd his case is squarely covered wifh number ofdecisions passed by ttsis Court aad also the judginent rendered by ftie M.P. Srate - Adininistiative Tribiuial, Jabalpiu- in Q^A. SQ. 2?4S/83 (SIcedhu.Sea.n.t Yeidu. & S6 Others Vs. Stttte ofMJP. & Others^ wliere m it has been held that simflarly placed teachers are entitled for regular pay scale fi-om ttie date ofthsir initial appoiatment. •^ It is not disputed by both the parties that the .matter was tslien up by the. Statc to .the Apex Court biit the appeal was also disrai.ssed by fhe Apex Court upholdiag fhe decisioa of the Tribunal to fhe effect that fbe Teachers/Assistaat Teachers are entitled for regular pay scale from. fhe date of fheir iaitial appoiatincnt. <; 6> la view of the above subiaission niade bv the counsel for the parties, the petition is disposed of ia the same tenns i.e.' thc petitioner is graated Hberty to inake a s^presentation, if so advised, ia the light of fhe aforesaid judginent aad the circular dated 5.1.2011 (Aanexure P/6) and ia tum, the concemed respondent is directed tb consider their case on its own inerits aad in its perspectwe. If the petitioner staads on the saine footimg as per order passed by ftie State Adiainistrative Trib'uiial. in Madliukaat Yadu (supra) aad siibsequently confirmed by tb.e Supreine Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) N0. 6892/93 by order dated 03.01.95, the petitkiner niay be entitled to same relief accordingly. It is exoected firomL tlie State authorities to oass suitable order after due scrutiny of the facts. It is m.ade clear that fhis court has not expressed a.ny opiaion on ftie aierits of fhe case aad the authori.ty concerned would be at libert}' to decide the represe&tation stxicfly in, accordauce witli law. Sd/- ^ Pritinker Diwaker ,-^ ie ;