4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAIJH7 AJ BILASPUR W.P. No._2t~^^ /2003 / Petitioners .^ ^^'' .'^^' ^^y •^' ^r-sy^ <^' .<^p) ^w 2. 14. Lakhan Lal, S/o Hardeo Sahu aged about 54 years, R/o village Tendubhatha, Post and Tahsil Saja, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Banshi, S/o Dheloo Sahu aged about 45 years, R/o village Tendubhatha, Post and Tahsil Saja, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Pardeshi, S/o Thanwar aged about 47 years, R/o village Tendubhatha, Post and Tahsil Saja, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Baishakhoo, S/o Same aged about 47 years, R/o village Tendubhatha, Post and Tahsil Saja, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Juthel S/o Pardeshi Sahu, aged about 51 years, R/o village Umariya, Post Kanhera, Distt. Durg Sukaloo, aged about 57 years, R/o Post Kusmi (Berla), Tah. Berla Dist Durg (C.G,) ^": ...* ^: f^ ..'^-. ^ t ..-•'. «•"" '^B 5 -2- ^i^: ^^ 7. Keju, aged about 49 years, R/o Post Kusini (Berla), Tah. Berla Dist Durg. (C.G.) 8. Nankoo S/o Kaliram Satnami aged about 57 years, R/0 •Qe^\J^S^ Distt. Durg (C.G.) 9. Ghanaram, S/o Jageshwar aged about 47 years, R/0 /J^^we^<^r^si Distt. Durg (C.G.) 10. Ganesh S/o Latel, aged about 51 years R/o fS-^^Jr'^-^. Distt. Durg (C.G.) ^...^ VERSUS Respondents ^•^ ^^^, y;' :~ -.-.. t>;, '• ''-" \ l "-. ,?'• ^'\ ...A '\\ '" »]/^^.^^^-MTV. 1 Jp&'^.'-;' ^. v..... , . ^'A ^Q^-'y 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through : Secretary Public Works Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G. 2. Chief Engineer Pub'lic Works Department Raipur (C.G.) 3. Superintendent Engineer Public Works Department Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 4. Executive Engineer, Public Works Department Bemetara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) iSKEf V^^-^—~^—ss ^!'t :^: •fl — 6 -3- .^ t ^ ^, -..^: 5. Sub Divisional Officer Public Works Department.,. Bemetara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 6. Sub Divisional Officer ' ' "' Public Works Department: ... Saja, Distt. Durg (C.G.) , • - WMT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. *ti*ic3ii ^Tn^ v ci<r<4r«Kp)*r,w<fl1<i<i<»,Klowy1< <_,0 . f t^Q , '20 ^f cn, 79 W^200 3TT^5T Ii?RP (yitgq<g) 3n^^T^TRni<p praTgn^sTirora! S^ffSR^fRd CT^^T 4?i^Irt4)^ ^i^c^T^ffe^ ^(vi^ix ^srf^Tsn^^T 'l^^' 14.11.2005 Petitioners by Shri S^ Respondents by Shri Meard. Learned counsel for| petitioners were working Idhir Veroia, Advocate. ^iTin Sao, Depiity Govt, Advocate. flie petitioner submits that fhe as Gaagman ia Public Works Department The petitioue^s were retired vide order dated 2,4.2003/24.3.2003 on att^iiimg 30 years ofseivice. Leai-aed counsel for the petitioner |uzlher submits that the present case is covered by tlie oi^der dated 15th September, 2005 passed by fhis Court ui W.I|'.No. 93/2005 (Bhai-atrain Saiiu & ofliers Vs, State of Chli|attisgarh & others) ' aiid ofher connected Biatter. Learaed connsel for the respondents does not dispute the fact, In viei¥oftlie foregoi^g, fliis petition is allowed ia terms ofthe order dafed 15.9.200^; passed m W.P.No. 93/2005. Certtfied capy, as per pules. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge /SP/FS/2005-20,000 y/^/^ T^ ^ ^