IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 2343 of 2004 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.01.2011 Darshan Lal .... Petitioner Versus Ram Sarup ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) C.M. No. 31396-CII of 2010 For the reasons stated in the application, C.M. application is allowed. Order dated 25.11.2010 is recalled and revision is restored to its original number. C.R. No. 2343 of 2004 Learned counsel for the revisionist states that pursuant to the decree passed for specific performance of the agreement, possession has already been delivered, hence, present petition has rendered infructuous and same may be dismissed as not pressed. Petition is dismissed as not pressed. (ALOK SINGH) 03.01.2011 JUDGE reena