HIGH COURT OF CHHA’I’I‘ISGJARH : BILASPUR Writ Patition (S) No 3§9 of 2009 Mannu Lal Slhnmal1 age about 39 yr, Shlksha Ka1m1 — 2 S[o Shn Tula Ram‘ Shmmah R/o Vlllage — Forest Colony Korar, Post Komr, 'ah Bhanupratappur, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) State Govt of Chham'sgarh/ through the Secretaly Panchayat 8a Rural Development Department D K S Bhawan, Rmpur (C Gr) Chhatnsgarh Professmnal Exammatlo Board Raipur through its Secretary, Raipur, Dlstt Ralpur (C G) The J11a Panchayat Dantewada, through 1t Chlef Executlve O$cer Dantewada D1stt Dantewada (C G) Petitioner Versus Respondents 1 (Wr1t Petltlon under Amcle 226 of the Conshtunon of Indla (SB‘ Hon’ble Shn Satlsh K. Agnthotn J.) ‘Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate 'for the respondent No. 1. 0 R D E Klara!) ( Passed on this 8*11 day of August, 2009 ) Heard Learned counse appeanng for the petltloner on mstrucuons, ésubmlts that the pentloner seeks perm1ss1on of thJs Court to ,%withdraw the Writ petition with liberty to take recourse to the ‘galternan've statutory appellate forum that may be available to “him under provisions of law. 2. ELeamed counsel appealing for the respondent No.1 has n i objection. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed, as withdrawn with j the above—stated libert. y (MN 7 sw— -. i SatlshK Agmhetrl i v- Judge i l I n s ) l o