skc 1 WP-8310-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8310 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2172 OF 2011 IDBI Bank Limited ..Petitioners versus Central Information Commission & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Venkatesh Dhond with Mr. Prakash Shinde and Mr. Avinash Singh Gautama i/b. MDP & Partners for Petitioners. Mr. Udaya S. Samudrala for Respondent No. 2. CORAM : D. D. SINHA AND SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. 10 October 2011 P.C. : Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent no. 2. 2. Writ petition is directed against the order dated 14th September 2011 passed by the Central Information Commissioner in appeal under Section 19(1) of The Right to Information Act, 2005. The operative part of the order reads thus : skc 2 WP-8310-11 “The Appeal is allowed. The PIO is directed to provide the complete information as per records to the Appellant before 10 October 2011.” 3. The learned counsel has brought to our notice the original application dated 6th September 2010 submitted by the respondent no. 2 under The Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking the following information: i. Copies of correspondence exchanged between UWB and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) with regard to shareholdings of Mittal Fabrics Manufacturing Co. P. Ltd. ii. A copy of the approval letter of the RTI according approval to the shareholdings of the said company. 4. The learned counsel has submitted that the petitioners shall provide only the above referred information within a period of two weeks from today to the respondent no. 2 and none else. 5. Counsel for the respondent no. 2 does not dispute that the information sought is as referred to herein above and the petitioners are skc 3 WP-8310-11 required to supply the same only. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent no.2, the petition may be disposed of. 7. In the backdrop of the above referred facts particularly in view of the statement made by the counsel for the respondent no.2, we dispose of the present writ petition accordingly. 8. Civil application also stands disposed of. (D. D. SINHA, J.) (SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)