THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.707 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioners filed O.S.No.122 of 2004 in the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Nandalur, against the respondents, for the relief of perpetual injunction. In the plaint filed by them, the nature of rights claimed, vis-à-vis the suit schedule property, are mentioned. The respondents opposed the suit. The trial of the suit is in progress. The petitioners filed I.A.No.208 of 2009, under Order XVI Rules 1 and 6 of C.P.C., with a prayer to summon letters, dated 30.04.2002 and 20.11.2002, said to have been written by the 3rd respondent. The application was opposed by the respondents, and the trial Court dismissed the application through order, dated 15.02.2010. Hence, this revision petition. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the necessity to file the application arose, on account of the fact that the respondents doubted the genuinity of the DKT pattas, issued in favour of the petitioners and a further plea that the petitioners are not in possession of the land. He contends that the summoning of the letters would throw light upon the facts of the case. In a suit for perpetual injunction, the burden squarely rests upon the plaintiff to prove his possession over the suit schedule property. The defendants, in a suit, cannot be required to supply any material to the plaintiff, in this regard. Further, when reliance is placed upon DKT pattas, the petitioners have to be proved that the same is genuine and valid. The letters, mentioned in the I.A., even if existed, cannot be required to be filed. No party, in a suit, can be compelled to provide evidence to the opposite party. The trial Court took correct view of the matter and this Court is not inclined to interfere with the order under revision. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as costs. _____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.22.02.2010. GJ