INTHEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) ^ Review Petition No. 11V) /2011 APPLICANT PETITIONER ,\v. -<ie5 ^^^^^^rf viS^T ^....•-••"^O '" \^-"""\y' NON-APPLICANT RESPONDENT ....•:••** ll.x" /...-" Versus /Pt. Ravi Shanker Shukla Vishwavidyalaya, Through its Registrar, Pt. Ravi Shanker Shukla Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur, (C.G.) Dr. Harshvardhan Tiwari, S/o Late Shri Ramgopal Tiwari, aged about 63 years, R/o Gyan Parisar, Near Pt. Ravi Shanker Shukla Vishwa- vidyalaya, Raipur (C.G.) .J^l. REVIEW APPLICATION UNDER ORDER XLVII, RULE 1 OF C.P.C. FQRREVIEW THE ORDER'JUDGEMENT DATED 12)Q9/20U MADE IN W.P.227, N0^43/2011. -, HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Review Petitioa No. 118/2011 APPUCANT Versus Pt. Ravi Shanker Shukla Vishwavidyalaya, Througli its Registrar, Pt, Ravi Shanker Shukla Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur, (C.G.). Dr. Harshvardhan Tiwari, S/o Late Shri Ranigopal Tiwari, aged about • 63 years, R/o Gyaa Parisar, Near Pt. Ravi Shanker Shukla Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur (C.G.). REVIEW APPLICATION UNDER ORDER XLVII, RULB 1 OF C.P.C. FOR RBVIBW THE ORDBR/JUDGEaBNT DATED 12/9/20ll MADE IN W.P. NON-APPLICANT RESPONDENT (SB :Koa'ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.j Present:- Shri Neeraj Choubey, Advocate for the petitioner/applicant. Non-appiicant/'respondent not noticed. (Passed oa 14/12/2011$ By this review petition petitioner has prayed for review ofthe order dated 12/9/2011 passed by this Court ia W.P. 227 No. 5343/2011. Learaed counsel for the petitioner subinits fhat earUer one civfl suit has ah-eady been decided at the time oforder dated 12/9/2011, Reasons best kaown to the counsel for the petitioner he is not mformed fhe aforesaid fact at fhe tiine of hearmg and even he is not prayed for withdrawal of the petitioa on the ground that petition was in&uctuous on that day, I do not find any ground for review. ConsequenUy, review petition is liable to be disiaissed and is hereby disinissed. T.P. Sharma Judge