1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION [S] NO.5OF 2011 IN SECOND APPEAL No. 339 OF 2009. Purushottam Pundlikrao Barade VERSUS Malati Vasant Pote and others. _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATED : 07.01.2011. Heard Shri M.P. Kariya, learned Counsel for applicant, Shri B. Vora, learned Counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 4, Shri P.S. Khubalkar, learned Counsel for respondent no.9 and learned A.G.P. for respondent nos. 5 and 6. By the above Civil Application, the applicant seeks setting aside of abatement against respondent no.7. The said order of abatement was passed on account of the fact that correct address of respondent 2 no.7 was not furnished by the appellant. The learned counsel for the appellant/applicant states that correct address of respondent no.7 finds place in the above Civil Application. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 4 and 9 submit to the orders of the Court. Civil Application is, therefore, allowed. The appellant/applicant to correct the address of respondent no.7 in the cause title of the appeal memo. On such amendment being carried out, issue notice to respondent no.7 on correct address, returnable on 04.02.2011. JUDGE Rgd