IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29835 of 2010 DILIP DAS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5 06.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. At the very outset, Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is unable to produce the documents of treatment as he is languishing in jail custody since 03.01.2009 and there is no one in his family to collect the above said documents of treatment of the deceased. Admittedly, the marriage of petitioner had taken place with the deceased six years ago and two children were born out of the aforesaid wedlock. The supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner reveals that the deceased was caught fire and thereafter, she was taken to hospital for treatment at Delhi where she died and her dead body was disposed of. The contention of Learned counsel for the petitioner is that as a matter of fact, after the death of deceased, the informant filed a Complaint Case which was converted into police case. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of detention of petitioner in jail custody, I direct the petitioner, namely, Dilip Das to be 2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Mahishi P.S. Case No. 59 of 2008 corresponding to S.Tr. No. 81 of 2009 to the satisfaction of F.T.C. No.-I, Saharsa. The petitioner shall attend the trial court on each and every date for the period of nine months and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates without any valid reason, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. Furthermore, the learned Additional Sessions Judge (F.T.C. No.-I), Saharsa shall take all possible steps to conclude the trial of the petitioner within nine months. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)