IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.11675 of 2010 Date of Decision : July 06, 2010. Ram Krishan Sharma .....Petitioner versus Union of India and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Pritam Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner alleges that respondent No.5 is running a retail outlet without obtaining any “No Objection Certificate” from the Ministry of Shipping-cum-Road Transport and Highways. In this regard, the petitioner is said to have served the official respondents with a notice dated 30.11.2009 (Annexure P-5), to which there appears to be no response. Thereafter, an advance notice dated 26.4.2010 was also sent but that too has not been responded. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and without expressing any views on the merits of the allegations made, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent Nos.2, 3 & 6 to take cognizance of the complaint made by the petitioner C.W.P.No .11675 of 2010 2 and dispose of the same in accordance with law/Government policy, within a period of one month from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. July 06, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE