IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 819 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- MOHMED BASIR MOHMED SIDDIQ @ BABLU Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MS KRISHNA U MISHRA for Petitioner MR MA PATEL APP for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE Date of decision: 04/10/1999 ORAL JUDGEMENT The grievance made in this Special Criminal Application by the petitioner is wholly misconceived. The second application of the petitioner for furlough has already been decided. This fact has not been disclosed by the petitioner. By this time, the petitioner certainly would have received the copy of the order passed by the competent authority on the second application for furlough. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent, which is not controverted by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing now substantial survives in this Special Criminal Application and the same is dismissed as premature. However, dismissal of this Special Criminal Application will not come in the way of the petitioner to file a fresh application challenging the order of rejection of the application for furlough. (S.K.Keshote, J.) *Pvv