1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.538 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.225 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 13, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus Rajesh M. Khandhar ..Respondent. Mr.A.S. Shivsharan for the appellant. Mr.K.C. Pandey for the respondent. CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ. DATE : 14 June, 2010. P.C. : 1. There is a delay of 336 days on the part of the Revenue in filing the appeal. The delay has been satisfactorily explained by furnishing a chronological account of the movement of the file. Sufficient cause has been shown. The Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)