IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No. 6170 of 2009 Between: M/s. Nova Agri Tech Pvt. Limited rep. by its Managing Director Y. Sambasiva Rao, S/o. Nageswar Rao, aged 32 yrs, R/o. Plot No.3 Sainest, Jayanagar, Road No.1 New Bowenpally, Sec'bad, Regd. Office at Plot No.5, 2nd floor, MJR Residency Vittal nagar, Chinatokatta, New Bowenpally, Sec'bad. A.P. ..... PETITIONER AND The Commissioner Director of Agriculture Opp. L.B. Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in interfering with the manufacturing and sale of petitioner's bio Products like pinakil, Sniper , Terminator, N. Counter, Mithr, N- Power, Samurai, Sacker, Gaint and Mics which contains Amino Acid and See-Weed extract, by issuing Memo No. PP.II(1)2085/2005 dt. 21- 1-2006 and letter No. PP.II(1)2085/205 dt. 21-1-2006 as being illegal, arbitrary unconstitutional and without jurisdiction and further direct the respondent not to interfere with in any manner in the manufacture, sale and distribution of petitioner's bio-products including from the licensed premises of the dealers/stockists under the Insecticides Act 1968 and Fertilizers Control (Order) Act 1985. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.V.BHASKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR AGRICULTURE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.6170 of 2009 ORDER: Learned counsel on either side fairly conceded that the issue that arises for consideration in this writ petition is squarely covered by an order of this Court, dated 25.04.2006, passed in W.P.No.8207 of 2006 and batch. In view of the above, this writ petition is also disposed of in terms of the order, dated 25.04.2006, passed in W.P.No.8207 of 2006 and batch. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU,J 24.03.2009 v v