IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 29TH JUNE 2007 / 8TH ASHADHA 1929 WA.No. 2635 of 2002() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN OP.14060/1999 Dated 04/07/2002 .................... APPELLANT: PETITIONERS IN O.P. ------------------------------ 1. V. RAJAGOPALAN, II GR. DRAFTSMAN, P.H. SUB DIVISION, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, PERINTHALMANNA. 2. N.C. VELAYUDHAN, II GR. DRAFTSMAN, P.H. DIVISION, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, EDAPPAL. 3. V. KURAMBA, II GR. DRAFTSMAN, W.S.P. SUB DIVISION, PERINTHALMANNA. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.BOSE RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS IN O.P. -------------------------------- 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, TRIVANDRUM. 2. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.H. DIVISION, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, EDAPPAL. 3. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE LENGINEER, W.S.P. SUB DIVISION, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, PERINTHALMANNA. BY ADV. S.C. FOR KWA SRI.BABU VARGHESE,SC,K.W.A. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.S.Radhakrishnan & Antony Dominic, JJ. ======================== W.A.No.2635 of 2002 ======================== Dated this the 29th day of June, 2007. JUDGMENT Radhakrishnan,J. Original Petition was preferred by the appellant seeking a writ of certiorari calling for the records leading to the decision not to promote the petitioners as Draftsman Gr.II earlier than 1998 and to quash the same and also for a mandamus compelling the respondents to promote the petitioners as Draftsman Gr.II with retrospective effect from 1985. Though the petitioner sought a writ of certiorari, no orders have been produced before this Court so as to examine as to whether the orders are correct or not. It is seen that one of the petitioners preferred Ext.P7 representation to the Managing Director, Kerala Water Authority for promoting him to the post of Draftsman Gr.II with retrospective effect from 1985 onwards. We are not told of the fate of that WA 2635/02 -: 2 :- representation. No adverse order has been produced before us. We see no error in the judgment of the learned single Judge and the Writ Appeal is dismissed. K.S.Radhakrishnan, Judge. Antony Dominic, Judge. ess 29/6