( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1285 OF 2009 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1285 OF 2009 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1285 OF 2009 Vinita Vinod Sawal .. Petitioner V/s Ramabai Anant Sawal & Ors. .. Respondents Ms.Varshal Palav for the petitioner. Mr.Sushil Chaurasia for Res.Nos.1 & 2. Ms.Sartaj Shaikh for Res.No.3. Mr.H.J.Dedhia, APP for the State. CORAM : R.G.KETKAR, J. CORAM : R.G.KETKAR, J. CORAM : R.G.KETKAR, J. (Vacation Judge) (Vacation Judge) (Vacation Judge) DATE : 22ND MAY, 2009. DATE : 22ND MAY, 2009. DATE : 22ND MAY, 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This petition is filed against the order dated May 5, 2009 passed in Misc.Application No.790 of 2009 filed in the Criminal Appeal No.285 of 2009. By the impugned order the learned Judge of the Designated Court for Bomb Blast Case, Greater Bombay declined to grant stay to the operation of the judgment and order dated March 13, 2009 passed by the learned Magistrate in Misc.Application No.208/M/2008 on the file of the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 9th Court, Bandra, Mumbai. 2. After hearing the learned Counsel for the parties at length, counsel agree that the impugned order may be quashed and set aside, and pending the Criminal Appeal No.285/2009 stay to the operation and execution of order dated March 13, 2009 may be granted with further direction to the learned Sessions Court to hear and ( 2 ) decide the appeal itself within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order. 3. In view of the fact that the parties have consented to setting aside the impugned order, I am not recording any reasons in support of this order. Hence, the following order:- ORDER (i) By consent, the impugned order dated May 5, 2009 passed by the learned Judge of Designated Court, Bomb Blast Case, Greater Bombay in Misc.Application No.790 of 2009 is quashed and set aside. Misc.Application No.790 of 2009 is hereby allowed. (ii) Pending the hearing and disposal of the Criminal Appeal No.285 of 2009, there shall be stay to the execution/operation of judgment and order dated March 13, 2009 passed by the learned Magistrate in Misc.Application No.208/M/2008 on the file of the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 9th Court, Bandra, Mumbai. (iii) The learned Sessions Judge shall endeavour to hear and decide the appeal itself as early as possible having due regard to the fact that the 1st Respondent is a senior citizen and the 2nd Respondent is an handicapped. The exercise shall be done within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order. 4. Petition is allowed in the above terms. (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (R.G.KETKAR, J.)