•-1 -\; ^ 'SN^tc »f"^.«l': fi'ira-Ll::.®^^, ('^4-^:s>^=- G^'2o<7^- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPyR(CG) WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^s4ii/2006 PETITIONERS ....^- /1 ^••"';^^'vy-)"" ,^-- .^fc /' r',0.^'.^ Manidas Manikpuri, aged about 43 years, son of Shri Budhu Das Manikpuri, Assistant Teacher, Government Primary School— Lafa, Vikas Khand Pali, District Korba (CG) Ghanshyam Prasad Kaushik, aged about 46 years, son of Shri Aditya Prasad Kaushik, Assistant Teacher, Government Primary School Donganala, Vikas Khand Pali, District Korba (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^A. State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Assistant Commissioner, ^Deptt of Tribal Welfare, District ' ^7^c,(C-G) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, XI-HC-78 (J2©) 3^'^rriii?ra', a-rfly'is, Riiiioy <^>. p. cs^ I^Jb . 70^^/0^ HI*IWI ai^frai ^ 200 3iT^riRra? (^igg^r) 3ti?-'(T Vf R^i+ (RTSlI^Tshllti s^iTwgfga'sn^r °tii'iifci<f1-f ii*«iTfftec3'<l«i+di< ^sri^irsn^r Subhash 19.12.2006 for the petitioners (s). ^dvocate with Shri Arun tndents/State. Sovednment 5hri i4.N. Bhakta, Advocat^ Shrj Sushil Dubey, Soo, &ovt. ^dvocate for the resp( With fhe consent of lear^ed counsel for the parties, the wr-it petition is heard fina!!y. Common order dictated in| open Court, passed seporately. Writ Petition (5.) 7043/2056 in Sd/- Satish K. Agmhotri Judge ^^' P.T.O. Petitioner 'ents Kailoish Panigrahi State of Oihattlsqarh & another dois Manikpurl & another Versus i-s State of Chhattisgarh & another SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satlsh K. Agmhotri, J Present: Shri A.N. Bhakta, Adyocate for the petitioners (s). Shri Sushii Dubey, Sovernment Advocate with Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for- the respondents/State. OR D E R (Passed on this 19+h day of December, 2006) The foiiowmg order of the Court is passed by Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Learned counse! appearing for the petitioners as atso for the 1. L-SQ Stats/respondents jointly submit that the facts of the present writ petitions are similar to that of in VV. P. (S) No. 5473/2006 (Rakesh Kumar Sharma S, uio1+ier vs. State of Chhatt'isgarh & others), which was disposed of vlde order dated 9.10.2006 (Annexure P/2). They further submit that the question of !aw involved is also the snme. 2. In view of 1+ie above stated submissions made by fearned counsel for the part-ies -ihe writ petitions nre disposed of in tsrms of the order dated 9.10.2006 passed by this Courf- in VV. P. (5) No. 5473/2006 Rakesh Kumar Sharma & ano1+ier vs. State of Chhattlsgarh & others). No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be pfaced on record i'n connected matters. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Subhash