§=H§H €$E§RT $F CHE‘EATTI$G§.R}L %IL§§SFEIR W.P.i3§ EEG. 372$ éf ZGQg B.R.Ni$had, sio Shri Tokhaxam N'ishad, agsd abéut 47 yaars, 110 Madhu'ban Road, Dayalband, Bilaspur, Tahsil and Di$t1ict Bilaspur (C.G-.) ?E‘?§TE$?§ER Versus RES?G§‘DENTS L State of Chhatfisgarh through the Secretarv General Adma'nistration Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Secretar, Rajsva Evam Apda Prabemdhan Vibhag, Mahtralaya, D.K.S. Bhawau, GnE. Road, Raipur (CG). 3. Collector, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur {C.G.) 4-. SK. Kashyap, Aeeistemt Grade-III, Collector Oiiiee, Bilaspur (C‘G) WRYE‘ PETETI§F§ UNDER ARTECLE 226 OF THE CQNSTITUEQN OF INDIA Agyeaeance; Shn‘ HB. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Miss Rinki Agrawa}; counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Smita Ghai, PL. appears for the State/respondents No.1,2 8a 3. on advance copy. GRAL QRDER {15.67.2008} SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard. Being aggrieved with the orders datecl 26.6.2008 5;, 3.7.2008, Annexures P-S 8a P-6, the yetiiioner has filed this Writ petition. By these Oi‘ders the petitioner Who was working a3 Assistant Grade III in the. Collectorate Bilaepur has been oosted 21$ Reader tn the office of Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, Biiaspur. Learoed counsel for the petitioner argues that the orders are in vio1atiou of ‘1i1e Circular dated 25111 of August 2000, ’21“ Feb. 2008 8v. 12th of J1me 2008. The circular dated 25th of August 2.000 W‘PJ S 5.N0.3720/2G03 I i3 a Circular of MP‘Govemment, themfore, it is not neceSSzuy to 100k into fhat Circular in the matter of the pafitioner. So far as ths Circu1ar dated 21.2.20G8 is concenmd, it containa‘. that 011 account of ire-esfabHshment of the ofEce of tha Commissioimr at Bilaspur, options we}? called for 330Sfjng. Lsarned counSal for th€ 116titi011er Submits that the petihbnsr has not giv€n a11y 0pti011, even fhan hf: has b€an poxted in Coi1}1iii3sion€i’s affice. Though ihere is Circular regarrling calling ths option but it cl0€§ not mean that the gmtitioner who would not 0m, will not be considiarad or sant to the nowly constituted offico. The last circular dated 12th of Juno 2008 is about tho taking liberal. and bouaiicle views in i116 matter of Schodulerl Castes, Scheduled Tribes 8r. O.B.Cs., in reepect their services. The counsel for the petitioner could not make out a case that how this circular is violated. In View of thia, l. do not find any irregularity in pasoing the oroer of posting of the petitioner from District OfFioe to the otiice of Commissioner, Bilaspur. In fact, it is a local shifting and even otheiwise also, it is not going to adversely affect the rights; of the petitioner in any situation. The petition has no meiits and the same is dismissed at the Sunil Kumar Sinha motion stage itself. ° Judge