(Applicaticn und er Section 482 of the Cr.P,C.) single Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice LC. Bhadeo 18-2-2008:- Shri Pradeep Singh, Pan Heard; ‘ pplicants submitted that in para-2 of second Learned counset for the page of the order dated 16- -2007 passed in M.Cr.C.(A.) Ne.457i2007 ‘‘advertentiy in piece of bro her-in-Iaw the word ‘husband' has been ntioned before l‘and father-i -iaw‘. The husband is 1% in jail whereas tether-in-iw has already en eleased'o 8mt. Padma Devi, W/o Ramraj, aged about 47 years, Caste Jaiswal, R/o Viilage Chakparona, Thana Gopiganj, Distt. Bhadohi (UR) Smi. Sushum, .W/o Sanjay, aged about 24 years, Caste Jaiswal, R/o Viilage Chakparona, Thana Gopiganj, Distt. Bhadohi (U.P.) Madan, Sio Champabia Bayhi, aged abaut 50 years, Caste Jaiswal, Rio Viilage Newada, Thana Anai, Distt. Banaras (U.P.) s- State _of Chhattisgarh, Through: Poiice' Chowky Lodam, Thana Jashpur Nagar, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) Lawyer for the State. Miss Sharmiia Singhai, ejmsei I for the applicants. a be n bail. h APPLICANTS: 1 . 2‘: 3‘ -Verst RESPONDENT: WW W Barve ’SKAtéh argument is not objectec (A) No.457/2007 the word brother-i fu’st line of second para before 'ang f‘ The application is disposed 0f ather-in-taw’. :\ i , accordingiy. ' i sal- l L.c.BHADoo .75; Judge r ’ W» i by learned counsel for the State. . Therefore, in para-2 of the ofder dated 16-8-2007 passed in M.Cr.C. Haw be read in piace of huSband in the