IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH OCTOBER 2011 / 27TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 12228 of 2011(C) ----------------------- PETITIONER : --------------------- K.M.NARAYANAN NAMBOOTHIRI, KALLIL NARAYANAMANGALATH MANA,VALLIKKAPATTA.P.O., MANKADA (VIA). MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN SRI.K.SANTHOSH KUMAR (KALIYANAM) RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER, MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD, KOZHIKODE - 673 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD, KOZHIKODE-673 001. 3. SREE MOOTHRUKUNNATH BHAGAVATHY DEVASWOM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE, MANJERI.P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676121. 4. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SREE MOOTHRUKUNNATH BHAGAVATHY DEVASWOM, MANJERI.P.O., MALAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676121. ADDL.R5 IMPLEADED *5. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE AND DEVASWAM DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. *IS IMPLEADED AS ADDL.R5 VIDE ORDER DATED 19/10/2011 IN I.A NO. 16737/2011 R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN, SC R4 BY ADV. SRI.M.G.ASHOKAN R5 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI. K.J. JOSE ADIYODI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- WP(C).No. 12228 of 2011(C) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 07-04-2010 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22-11-2010 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P3 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P4 : COPY OF THE EXECUTION APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 28-12-2010. EXT.P5 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 16-06-2011 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P6 : COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 1-07-2011 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER FOR HEARING ON EXHIBIT P5 APPLICATION. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : EXT.R4(A) : COPY OF MEMORANDUM OF REVISION NO. 19303/DW1/RD DATED 29.3.2011. EXT.R4(B) : COPY OF THE ORDER IN I.A. 9/2011 IN AP 10/2010 DATED 26.4.11. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mn K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No.12228 of 2011-C. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 19th October, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner was the Melsanthi of Sree Vaypara Sreekrishna Temple, a sub temple under the trusteeship of the third respondent. While working as such, he was suspended from service on the basis of certain charges. Thereafter his services were also terminated. The petitioner challenged his termination by filing an appeal before the second respondent as A.P.No.2/2009. The second respondent allowed the appeal as per Ext.P1 order and directed the third respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service. The third respondent had challenged Ext.P1 order by filing an appeal before the first respondent as A.P.No.10/2011. The first respondent dismissed the appeal and directed the third respondent to reinstate the petitioner. The petitioner has filed this writ petition WP(C).No.12228/2011-C. 2 complaining that he has not been reinstated in service as per the orders of the first respondent. 2. Along with the counter-affidavit filed by the fourth respondent, who is now the trustee in charge of the third respondent, Ext.R4(A) has been produced. Ext.R4(A) is a Revision Petition No.19303/DW1/RD filed by the fourth respondent challenging the order directing the reinstatement of the petitioner. The said revision is still pending. 3. I have heard the counsel for the Malabar Devaswom Board also. In view of the fact that Ext.R4(A) is pending consideration of the additional fifth respondent, I am of opinion that this writ petition can be disposed of directing the said revision to be considered and disposed of without further delay. 4. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of directing the additional fifth respondent to consider and finally dispose of the revision filed by the fourth respondent, WP(C).No.12228/2011-C. 3 evidenced herein by Ext.R4(A) in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner also. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, (Judge) Kvs/-