Cr. M.P.(M) No. 1043 of 2009 31.12.2009 Present: Mr. G.R. Palsra, counsel for the petitioner. Mrs. Shubh Mahajan and Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate General, for the respondent. Heard. The petitioner was granted bail by the learned trial Court, but his bail was cancelled since he tried to win over the witnesses. It was submitted at the bar by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the statement of main witness Harish Kumar has been recorded and only formal witnesses are to be recorded. This statement is incorrect as per the statement made by the learned Assistant Advocate General after verification and statement of the main eye witness Harish Kumar is yet to be recorded and the case is fixed for evidence on 24th February, to 26th February, 2010. Once the bail has been cancelled by the learned trial Court after consideration of the allegations and the statement of the main eye witness has not been recorded, no case is made out for grant of bail. However, the petitioner is at liberty to apply for bail after the statement of main witness Harish Kumar has been recorded by the learned trial Court. In view of the above, the application stands disposed of. ( V.K. Ahuja ), December 31, 2009 Judge (BSS)