IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 21990 of 2005 Between: Munnuru Muralidhar Reddy, S/o Munnuru Balakrishna Reddy R/o Epuru Village Muthkur Mandal, Nellore District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Assistant Commissioner of Endowments Nellore, Nellore District. 2 Sri Chenna kesava Swamy Temple, Epuru Village, Muthukuru mandal, Nellore,district 3 Sri Isanaka Balakrishna Reddy S/o Narayana Reddy, R/o Epuru Village, Muthukuru mandal, Nellore,district 4 Udatha Chenchaiah S/o Masthanaiah R/o Epuru Village, Muthukuru mandal, Nellore,district 5 Sri Isanaka Sivanarayana Reddy S/o Venkata Rami Reddy R/o Epuru Village, Muthukuru mandal, Nellore,district 6 Sri Dara Srinivasulu, S/o Venkata subbaiah R/o Epuru Village, Muthukuru mandal, Nellore,district 7 Smt Linga Reddy Rathnamma W/o Yedukondala Reddy R/o Epuru Village, Muthukuru mandal, Nellore,district .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.VIDYASAGAR Counsel for Respondent No.1: AGP FOR ENDOWMENTS Counsel for Respondent Nos.3 to 7: MS. P.VIJAYALAKSHMI FOR MR. P.SRIDHAR REDDY The Court made the following : ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondent No.1 in constituting the Board of Non-hereditary Trustees to Sri Chennakesava Swamy Temple, Epuru Village, Muthukur Mandal, Nellore District vide proceedings, dated 27.05.2005 issued by him, as illegal and arbitrary. At the hearing, Sri M.Vidyasagar, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of expiry of two years term of the Trust Board, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. He, however, stated that since the entitlement of respondent No.4 to be the Chairman of the Trust Board is disputed by the petitioner, the petitioner may be given liberty to raise the said issue, if and when such an occasion arises in future. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.28226 of 2005 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 15th JULY, 2008. kvni