HIGHCQURT OEeHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR SinaieBench : Hon'bteShri Dilip RaosahebDeshmukh. J. ,C.C.No.190of2008 Applicant Respondents 1. 2. Gopal Prahlad Kumar Gupta, age 58 years, S/6 Shri Govind Prasad Gupta, R/o Village Gudi, PostGudi ViaSipat, Distt.Bilaspur (C.G.) versus Sahasram, aged years, Maheshram.aggd years, Both sons of Shivmangal, R/o Near Gayatri Mandjr, Talapara Road, Behind Old Government School, Vidyanagar, Tahsil and Distt.Biiaspur (C.G.) Aoolication for Restoration ofSecond ApDeal No.981/96 Present: Shri Vivek Verma,counsel for the applicant. ORALORDER (Passed on thisZ"'1 day of September, 2009) This M.C.C. is being disposed of finalfy at the stage of admission. @) Heard. (3) Shri Vivek Verma, learned coynsel for the apptjcant argued that on 10-4-2008 when Seeond Appeat No.981 Wwas dismissed in default ofthe appellant, the matter was listed for hearing on anapptication for urgent hearing. (4) Considering the argumentofleamed couhsel for the applieant and the facts and cireumstances.theM.C.C. is allowed. Se<%nd Appeal No.981/96 is restored to fjle and be now listed. s^^s^^ .aosabe'° 0^9 ^""^&6e .----