HISH COURT <r CHHATTIS©< HAT BILASPUR W,P.(S)No. 1387 of 2007 Single Bench:Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Petitioner Rqju Yodov, S/o Dhansai Yadav Aged about 30 years, resident of Villo9e Kudri, Block-Batoda, bistfict-Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Respondents 7. State of Chhattisgm'h through Secretary, Panchayat & Social Welfore Deportment, Mantraia^'a, b.K.S. Bhawan, Shastri Chowk, Saipur (C,&.) Oeptrty Director, Panchsyat & Social Welfare bepartment, bistrict jQnjgir-Champa (C.6.) Sub-t>ivisiona! Officer, Qievenue) JanJ9ir, &istrict-JanJ9ir-Champa (C.e.5 Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchoyat, Baloda, bistrict Janjgir-Champa (C.6.) Sar-panch, ©rcmPanchayat Kudri, Block Baloda, bistrict Janjgir- Chamjw (C.©.) Rakeah Roshan Yadav S/o. Late Radhey Shyam Yadav, aged about 34 years, Resident of viilage-Kudoiri, Block-Baloda, Oistrict Janjgir-Champa (C.6.) (" • Cotlector, Janjgsr-Chwnpa (C.6.) Present: Mr. Ra9havendra Pradhan, counset for the petitioner. Ms. Deepali Pandey, Panel Laiwyer for the State/ respondent No. 1 to 3 and 7. Mr. Porag Kotechha, eounse! for" the respondent No. 6. Subhssh ORDER >th (Passed on 13th bay of Morch, 2007) 1. In this petition, the petitioner- chali'enges the non appointment of the petitioner as Ponchoyat Karmi/Secretory on the ground that the proceedings of ©r-amSabha for approval of appointment was not in accordance wlth !i»'. 2. The pettl'ione" preferred an appeal before the &ib-divisional Officer (Revenue) Janjgir', District- Janjgir-Champa whereunder, vide order dated 10.4.2006 (Annexure P/65, atlowed the applieati spplieation of the petittoner and declared the proceedings for appointment of Kj aggrieved, the respondent No. 6 preferred an appsa! before 3. the Coltector, Janjgir-Champa. The Collector, Janjgir-Champa vide order dated 14.11.2W6 (Annexure P/l), after having considered alt the aspects, quashed the order passed by the Sub-Divisional Offieer and ailowed the oppeal of the selected candidate respondent No. 6. There is an aftematlve efficacious remedy ovaitabie to the petitioner under Ru!e 3 of the M.P. Panchayats (Appeol and Revision) RuSes, 199! which the petitioner has not avalled befope coming to this Court. 4. Thus, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to avsi! the statutory remedy that may be wailab!e to him. Consequentiy, M.(W.)P. No. 894/2007, an application fop gront of interim writ, stands disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge