IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.6576 of 2005 Between: 1 K.S. Prakash Reddy, S/o. K. Raghunatha Reddy, having its place of business at Shop No.7, Municipal Shopping Complex, Near Gandhi Statute, Prakasham High Road, Chittoor Town, Chittoor District. 2 V. Rajendran, S/o. G.Venkatesan, having its place of business at Shop No.8, Municipal Shopping Complex, Near Gandhi Statute, Prakasham High Road, Chittoor Town, Chittoor District. 3 N. Raghuram Reddy, S/o. S.N. Narasimha Reddy, having its place of business at Shop No.9, Municipal Shopping Complex, Near Gandhi Statute, Prakasham High Road, Chittoor Town, Chittoor District. 4 B. Satyanarayana Chetti, S/o. B. Seshaiah Chetty, having its place of business at Shop No.11, Municipal Shopping Complex, Near Gandhi Statute, Prakasham High Road, Chittoor Town, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Chittoor Municipality, rep. by its Commissioner, having Office in Municipal Office Building, Thiruthani Road, Chittoor Town, Chittoor District. 2 The Municipal Commissioner, The Chittoor Municipality, Having his Office at Municipal Office Building, Thiruthani Road, Chittoor Town, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to Issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing the Notice in R.O.C.No.49/2005/A1 to the petitioners is illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice, Sub Section 1 and 2 of Sec. 194 of the A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965, the provisions of A.P. Public Premises ( Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1968, the provisions of Limitation Act and contravention of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.P.ROY REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: MR.S.I.NEWTON The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.6576 of 2005 ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, the interim order granted on 29-03-2005 stands vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 07-03-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{JGK}