IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.22106 of 2011 Date of Decision: 29.11.2011 M/s Deepak Rice Mill Rajgarh Road Dhanaula District Barnala through its Proprietor Vijay Kumar. ... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab through its Secretary, Department of Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Room No.410, 4th Floor, Punjab Mini Secretariat, Sector 9, Chandigarh and others. ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:Mr. Aman Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** 1.Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? NO 2.To be referred to the reporters or not? NO 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? NO K. KANNAN, J. (Oral) 1. The counsel for the petitioner states that the writ petition itself be treated as a representation and he will be satisfied if the 2nd respondent considers his claim and take appropriate decision within a reasonable time in the light of the judgment of this Court, which is annexed as P-3. 2. It is directed that the 2nd respondent shall consider the petitioner's case and shall take the appropriate decision within a period of 8 weeks from the date of the order. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, dispensing with the notice to the respondents. NOVEMBER 29, 2011 ( K. KANNAN ) Rajan JUDGE