C.W.P.Nos.1413 and 3451 of 1994 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1. C.W.P. No.1413 of 1994 M/s DCM Ltd. ...Petitioner Vs. Sh.B.R.Vohra and Anr. ...Respondents 2. C.W.P.No.3451 of 1994 Suraj Prakash Mehta ...Petitioner Vs. Presiding Officer & Anr. ...Respondents. Date of Decision:13.12.2011 CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present:- Mr.Harvinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Ankit Goel, Advocate for respondent No.2. M ehinder S ingh S ullar , J. (Oral) As is evident from the record that Suraj Prakash Mehta workman (respondent No.2) was working and promoted as Security Inspector by the petitioner-management of M/s DCM Limited, Hisar. He claimed the parity of same wages and allowances, as were being paid to Security Inspector working with the management of DCM at Delhi. The management refuted his claim. 2. In the wake of petition under section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court (respondent No.1) directed the management of DCM, Hisar to pay an amount of ` 1032/- on account of difference of indicated arrears and allowances, by virtue of impugned order dated 8.10.1993 (Annexure P1). 3. Aggrieved by the order (Annexure P1), the management of DCM C.W.P.Nos.1413 and 3451 of 1994 -2- filed CWP No.1413 of 1994, challenging the indicated impugned order , whereas the workman filed his separate CWP No.3451 of 1994, claiming enhancement in the wages. 4. At the very outset, the learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the impugned order has already been implemented and the amount had already been paid to the workman. Moreover, since the workman has already died, so, the present writ petitions have become infructuous, which may be dismissed as such. 5. In this view of the matter, the instant writ petitions are disposed of as having become infructuous. (Mehinder Singh Sullar) 13.12.2011 Judge AS