1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 189 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO. 189 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO. 189 OF 2007 IN IN IN INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 2760 OF 2006 TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 2760 OF 2006 TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 2760 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income-Tax Mumbai .... Appellant Vs. M/s DGP Windsor (I) Ltd. .... Respondent Mr. B.M. Chatterji with Mrs. P.B. Bhosale for Appellant. Mr. Vasanti B. Patel for Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, & : F.I. REBELLO, & : F.I. REBELLO, & J.P. J.P. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DEVADHAR, JJ. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 29TH OCTOBER, 2007 : 29TH OCTOBER, 2007 : 29TH OCTOBER, 2007 P.C.: . The delay is less than 200 days. Considering the practical difficulties which the Department was facing including referring the matters to the Law Department, Government of India for drafting the Appeal Memo and considering the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, in our opinion, the cause shown would amount to sufficient cause. Hence, delay condoned. The Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 2. Office to register the Appeal. ( J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.) J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.) J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)