WPMS NO.1627 of 2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. S. S. Yadav, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Singh, the learned counsel for the respondent nos.2, 3 & 4. The recognition to conduct B.Ed. course was rejected by the Northern Regional Committee (N.R.C.) of the National Council for Teacher Education, against which the petitioner preferred an appeal, which was also rejected. The petitioner, being aggrieved, has filed the present writ petition. The basis for rejecting the application of the petitioner for conducting the B.Ed. course is that the certified copies of the documents required by the N.R.C. was not furnished. On the other hand, the petitioner alleges that authenticated copies notarised by a oath commissioner was submitted, inspite of which, the application has been rejected. Without going into the controversy as to whether the valid documents were submitted by the petitioner or not, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction that in the event, the petitioner furnishes the certified copy of the documents required by the Committee, which are not notarised by a notary or by an oath commissioner, the same shall be accepted by the Committee and the application of the petitioner for grant of recognition for conducting the B.Ed. course will be reconsidered within three weeks from the date of submission of such documents. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 18.09.2010 LSR