(^/=-2^00/-. © BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No.^'^7"2-/2006 PETITIONER ^:": '<^'^ 'l..'?-.'' <>" : 1) Kanhaiya Lal Gupta, - S/o Shri Bharat Lal Gupta, Nagarpalika Girls Primary School, Kawardha 2) Resham Das Dhritltare, S/o/' Shri Sakharam Dhritltare, Govt. Priraaty School, Paneka. 3) Smt. Urmila Mahobia, W/o Shri Ramesh Kumar Mahobia, Nagarpalika Girls Primary School, Kawardha 4) Smt. Sushma Shrivastava, W/o Shri Rajesh Kumar Shrivastava, Nagarpalika Girls Primary School, Kawardha 5) Smt. Bhagwati Tamboli, D/o, Shri M R Mahobia, NagarpaUka Girls Primary School, Kawardha. 6) Shiv Narayan Mishra, S/o Shri Prahlad Mishra, Govt. Primary School, Navapara, Bhamni. K7) Anuj Kumar Chandravanshi,/ Govt. Primary School, Birutola 8) Haider Ali Khan, S/o Shri-^ Munshiraza, Govt. Primary School, Rekhakhar 9) Lalchand Lanjhi, S/o Shri/ Jivrakhan Lanjhi, Govt. Primary School, Paliguda. 10) Smt. UshaDubey, Main Primary School, ^' •^[leiu^Bqp 'poiiog Areuiud 'iqsireABJpiieqo fBjajB^i uqg o/S 'iqsireABJpireqo urey 3(3j, (z;e •B^p^oqo 'lOOqOg AlBUTLy 'BAB^SBAUqg JB^ urBqouiu^N uqg o/g 'BAB^SBAuqg BJpireqo qspBg [\z •Buoyig 'iooqog A-reuiuj jrLS[Bqj, qSuTg urejrsireqo uqg o/s 'jrupiqj, q§uig JBAqsyi (oe •It[3-tBp3g '{ooqog AIBUIUJ '^AOQ 'nips JBum?! ^oqsv (6T •v\y>.ref&v^ 'poqog syiQ vs[TfBcLn3Sef^ 'iooqos ajppipv 'BAjeqp BqqBJd iqsBqg •:mg (gT •uoBgfB}\[ 'poqog AJBUIU(I ' 'BUJJBqg pT3SBJJ plIBUV (ZT •Bl(pJBAB5I 'iooqog AlBiuud qqnurejd 'pq trepBiM uqg ai^t o/s 'BAB^s^Auqg jeuin^ ^fefuBg (91: •jndgLrejqsBQ '(ooqog 3IPPW 'is^ng qSuig pdoo uqs o/s 'p^ng I^TqooH (ST •jnd§LrejL[SBa '(oot[3g Areuiud 'nqBg snfrey 1-iqS o/s 'nqsg i^j ueqoy( (frl •jndueAg '(ooqog A.TBUIUJ 'IAOQ 'BULreqg pBS^Jj o3p)^g uqg 0/g '^uij^qg jBq^aqsBJpireqo (gi: •unduiiq'g 'IOOqog AlBIUUd '^AOQ 'aje^puqa aiey nireqa UIIS o/g 'sj^puqa SBQ paaiBH (21 BJBASBJB(J 'poi;og AreuiT-y •IAOQ 'aqjeg urejnqqoqg "qg o/s 'sqjeg ^^qqAiqg (IT •BqpjreAB^I t>— RESPONDENTfSl 23) Tek Ram Sahu, Primary School, Uslapur, Bodla. 24) Sukil Ram Sahu, S/o Shn, Chaitu Ram Sahu, Primary School, Kheli. 25) Smt. Kamlini Agrawal, D/o Shri Sanjay Kuraar Gupta, Priniary School, Khalsa. 26) Dashrath Nirmalkar, Middle School Barahani. VERSUS : 1) State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, School Education Dept., D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (CG) 2) Distt. Education OfGcer, Distt. Kabirdham (Kawardha) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 Ss 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ~\ •) HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (Sl No. 6242 of 2006 Petitioners : Kanhaiya Lal Gupta & ottiers -Versus- Respondents : Strte of Chhattisgarti &anottrer SB: Hon'bte Mr. Justtee Satish K. Agnihotri, >1 Present: Shri P. S. Koshy, Advocate for tfie petitioners. Shri V. V. S. Murthy, Depidy ^ivocate Generat fbr the respondents. ORDER (Passed on this 8"' day of Mareh, 2007) 1. The petitioners were appointed as Asstetart TeaAer on fixed pay of Rs. 150/- in the year 1982-^. Aflsr comptetkMt of two year's pnAafion. they were granted regular pay scale. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petifioners submtts that 8ie vssue invohred in the case is asto whether the petiConeFs are entffied to regular pay scate w.e.f. the date of infUat appointment or from the <tete <rf compleUon of probation period. 3. The issue involved, heran was consictered by the Madhya Prade^i State Adrrunistrafive Tribunal, Jabalpur in OA No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. & ottiers), wherein tt was held ttiat the similariy situated teEchers are entitted to r^utar pay scate w.e.f. the date of initiat appointment The matter was taken up to Uie Hon'bte Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6882/93. The said pettion was dismissed by tte Hon'bte Supreme Court upholding the deciskm rf the Tn'bunal to <he effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachera are entiUed to r^ular pay scate from date of initial appointment. "i- Thakur 4. Leamed counsel appearing for the petiBonere further submtts that this Court. while conskfering Uie same issue in W. P. (s) 5876 of 2006 (SushB Tnwari & ottiers Vs. State Govt. of ChhatUsgarh & others), whfch was altowed vkte order dated ^ November, 2006, has granted regutar pay scate w.e.f. <he date of iniBal appoinbnent 5. Leamed counsel appearing for the parties jdntly submit that this case is squarely covered by fte deciskm <rf this Cwirt in (he case <rf Sushil Thwari (Supra). 6. In view of that, this petition is allowed m the same terms. No order as to costs. __.,_.-.-.-- ' Sd/- SanshK.Agmhotn Judge ^. ^-