IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1265 of 2010 Rambriksha Sao @ Doman Sao, son of Kisun Sao, resident of Shivnagar Thana, District- Nawada …………Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar …………………………..Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 07. 04. 2010. Heard Mrs. Rina Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Uday Prasad, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant as also Mr. Nasim Sahya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Nawada Town P. S. Case No. 392/09 dated 08. 10. 09, registered under Sections 304 B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is father-in-law of the deceased. During the course of investigation, some material has come to show that petitioner is not responsible for the offence in question rather deceased committed suicide. Learned counsel for the state as also the informant have strongly opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and have stated that there is specific allegation of demand of dowry and torture against this petitioner and in fact two persons have been killed in the present case. In that view of the matter, prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is dismissed. The petitioner must surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today and if so advised, seek regular bail. If such a petition is filed, then the same may be disposed of on 2 its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. m.p. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)