1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1126/2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1454 OF 2011 (Ranjit S. Parde vs. Managing Director, M.S. Power Generation Co. Ltd. and others) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : APRIL 28, 2011 Heard Shri Verma, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Shri Rode, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent no.3. Shri Verma, learned Counsel for the petitioner, states that the petitioner has moved Civil Application No.1126/2011 for direction to the respondent nos. 1 and 2 to keep one post of Assistant Engineer vacant till decision of the petition. It is submitted by Shri Verma, learned Counsel for the petitioner, that the petitioner had 2 applied for the post of Assistant Engineer pursuant to the earlier advertisement issued by the respondent nos. 1 and 2. The petitioner appeared before the Selection Committee and his name was shown at serial no.24 in the Select List. It is contended that marks secured by the petitioner from Scheduled Caste category were 51.9% and in spite of selection of the petitioner, the name of petitioner did not find place in the appointment orders issued by the respondent nos. 1 and 2 and, therefore, petitioner filed this petition and this Court has issued notice before admission. Shri Verma, learned Counsel for the petitioner, states that during pendency of the petition, the respondent nos. 1 and 2 once again issued advertisement dated 20/4/2011 for filling up the posts of Assistant Engineer and in all 85 posts are required to be filled up. It is submitted that in the facts and circumstances of the present case, direction may be issued to the respondent nos. 1 and 2 to keep one post of Assistant Engineer vacant till petition is decided. In view of the above referred facts, 3 prima facie it appears that name of the petitioner was shown in the select list of Assistant Engineers. However, name of the petitioner does not find place in the appointment orders. The respondent nos. 1 and 2 once again issued the advertisement for filling up the posts of Assistant Engineer and, therefore, in the interest of justice, we direct the respondent nos. 1 and 2 to keep one post of Assistant Engineer vacant until further orders. With these observations and direction, the civil application is disposed of. Stand over to 24/6/2011 for admission. JUDGE JUDGE khj