IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 42 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1905 OF 2005 ADIVASI SEVA SANGH (REGD.) ... PETITIONER VERSUS THE COMMISSIONER, DAIRY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT & Ors. ... RESPONDENTS Mr. A.A.Jadhav for the petitioner. Mr. R.S.Lokane for Respondent No.8. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. DATE : 13th October,2006 DATE : 13th October,2006 DATE : 13th October,2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The order of which contempt is alleged to have been committed was passed on 6th September, 2005 whereby the Court directed the Respondents toensure that necessary repairs and maintenance work is carried out, in accordance with the rules and regulations, as expeditiously as possible, in any event, within two months. 2. The Respondents have now filed an affidavit giving room-wise repair work carried out in the premises. Last week, though this affidavit is filed, even then the learned Counsel for the petitioner made grievnace that still complete repairs and maintenance work is not carried out. Therefore, the Court directed to file an affidavit. He has filed an affidavit. Perusal of the affidavit shows that there are room-wise remarks. It appears that substantial work of repairs and maintenance have been carried out by the respondents. Therefore, no need to proceed against them. If the grievance of the petitioners is that some work has remained, the learned Counsel for the Respondents states that the same would be carried out as and when need arises within six months from today. 3. Under the circumstances, the order has been substantially complied with. There is no need to proceed against the Respondents. The contempt petition is disposed of. Parties to act on a copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate of this Court. --- (S.K.SHAH,J.) (S.K.SHAH,J.) (S.K.SHAH,J.)