1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2810 OF 2009 Rajendrakumar C. Morzaria Applicant versus Ashok Shivraj Mehta and others Respondents Mr.Priyal G. Sarda for applicant. Mr.Vaibhav R. Gaikwad i/by A.M.Kulkarni for respondent no.1. Mr.Rajesh More, APP for the State. CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 20th August 2011 PC : 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for parties. In a proceeding under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, process was issued against a private limited company of which the applicant is one of the Directors. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that no notice was served upon the applicant. However, it is contrary to his own assertion in paragraph (k) of the grounds. 2. It appears that Criminal Revision Application No.149 of 2001 was moved by the present applicant before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, at Sangli and faced rejection thereof on 18th May 2007. In spite of this, the applicant has suppressed this fact. This is not expected of the applicant. 3. The feature of the applicant not to be an active Director of the private limited company is agitated for the first time in this aplication 2 without any specific details. Only a general reference in ground no. (G) is found. Taking these aspects into consideration, I do not see any reason to interfere with the order of issuance of process. The aspects touching the merits of the case are not discussed as it would adversely influence the learned JMFC dealing with the case. The revision application lacks merits. Dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.)