1 wp 610-2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 610 OF 2011 Bhupendrabhai P. Pandya ...Petitioner vs. Senior Inspector of Police, Samta Nagar Police Station, Kandivali (East), Mumbai & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.S.V. Marwadi for the Petitioner. Ms.M.H. Mhatre, APP for the State. CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & U.D. SALVI, JJ. JUNE 24, 2011 P.C. :- 1 We have heard Mr.Marwadi, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, who claims to be a religious preacher and social worker. At his instance, CR No. 385/2010 has been registered with the Samta Nagar Police Station, Kandivali(East), on 6th January, 2010 for the offences punishable under Sections 465, 467, 468, 471, 420 read with 34 and 511 of IPC against Mrs.Arti Mehta, Mrs.Manisha Pandya and Ms.Namsvi 2 wp 610-2011 Pandya. Mrs.Manisha Pandya and Ms.Namsvi Pandya are the petitioner’s wife and daughter, respectively, and Mrs.Aarti Mehta is claiming to be an Agent of M/s.Birla Sun Life Insurance Company Limited. The petitioner prays for transfer of the investigation in CR No.385/2010 to some other police station. 2 Shri Anant Kenjale, Senior Police Inspector, has filed affidavit-in-reply and submitted that the statements of Deputy Manager and Development Manager of M/s.Birla Sun Life Insurance Company have been recorded and the insurance policy of the petitioner which was encashed has been restored/reinstated as per the communication dated 16th December, 2010. Accused Arti Mehta, Manisha Pandya and Namsvi Pandya obtained anticipatory bail orders on 3rd February, 2011 and 19th March, 2011, respectively. They were directed to attend the police station so as to complete the investigation. The investigation has been completed and the final report has been 3 wp 610-2011 submitted on 17th June, 2011 as has been stated by Mrs.Mhatre, the learned APP on instructions. 3 We direct that a copy of the final report shall be made available by the Investigating Officer to the petitioner and in case, he is in receipt of the original policy, the same shall be returned to the petitioner after following due procedure. 4 The petition is disposed off with liberty as is available in law. (U.D. SALVI, J) (B.H. MARLAPALLE, J)