1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 2834 OF 2010. Janta Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Chandrapur. -: VERSUS :- Papita Madhukar wankar and another. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : AUGUST 23, 2010. Heard Shri S.S. Shirsat, learned Counsel for petitioner and Shri A.S. Chandurkar, learned Counsel for respondent no.1. Perused termination order. It uses the words like – irresponsible behaviour, negligence, arrogant conduct, physical unfitness, fabrication of false documents. The order is therefore rightly found to be stigmatic prima facie by the School Tribunal. The judgment of this Court reported at 2009 (3) Mh.L.J. 810 (Anand Education Society, Lakhni .vrs. Bharti Bhaskarrao Parsodkar and others), considers termination order, reproduced in paragraph no.10 there. The said order is not stigmatic, in view of the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court reported (1999) 3 SCC 60 (Deepti Prakash Banerjee .vrs. Satyendra Nath Bose). At this stage, the order cannot be viewed as order of plain and simple termination. No case is 2 made out warranting interference in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is therefore, rejected, with no order as to costs. At the request of learned Counsel for petitioner, the proceedings in Appeal filed by respondent no.1 are expedited and the School Tribunal, Chandrapur is directed to decide the same as early as possible and in any case by 28.02.2011. JUDGE Rgd.