1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICAUTRE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICAUTRE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICAUTRE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1724 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 1724 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 1724 OF 2004 Shri. Bhikaji Sonu Pansare & anr. ... Petitioners Vs. Mumbai Agriculture Produce Market Committee ... Respondents Mr. Satish Shetty i/by M.P. Vashi & Associates for Petitioner. Mr. N.N. Bhadrashete for R. Nos. 2 and 3. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & S.P. S.P. S.P. KUKDAY,JJ. KUKDAY,JJ. KUKDAY,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : MARCH 02, 2005 : MARCH 02, 2005 : MARCH 02, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. . If the petitioners are interested in galas reserved by the Respondents for them, they are called upon to do so by making payments demanded within twelve weeks from today. On such payment, galas may be given to him. If the Petitioners do not elect to make payment, respondents are free to allot the galas to any other persons. The grievance of the Petitioner regarding interest that has been charged pursuant to the recommendations of hte committee of this court headed by Justice Daud cannot be sustained. Hence, no interference is called for in the charging of interest by the respondents. With above observation, petition stands disposed off. (F.I. (F.I. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) REBELLO,J.) REBELLO,J.) (S.P. (S.P. (S.P. KUKDAY,J.) KUKDAY,J.) KUKDAY,J.)