1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 60. WP/1597/2010 (KUNAL ASHOKRAO AHER AND ORS V/S GOVARDHAN MOHANLAL KARVA AND OTHS) With CA/2445/2010 In WP/1597/2010 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr.S.R.Choukidar, Adv., h/f Mr. V.D.Salunke, Adv., for the petitioner. Ms.Anjali D.Bajpai, Adv., for respondent nos. 1 & 8 to 10. ... CORAM:K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 28/9/2010 ... 1. Civil Application No. 2445/2010, not pressed, disposed of. 2. Heard. In a plaintiffs suit the defendant moved application ( Exh.842) seeking injunction not to alienate the property by creating third party interests. Learned Judge has not passed any order, barring "other side to say". It cannot be said that any impediment is created against plaintiff by such application. 2 The settled position of law, in a suit filed by the plaintiff, defendant seeking injunction, has its own limitation. Learned Judge seized with the matter will definitely deal with the legal position. At this stage, writ itself is premature and, in a haste. Writ Petition disposed of. Needless to add, the parties should be conscious of Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, which has its rigour to the lis. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... (agp:1597-10wp)