1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi NOTICE OF MOTION NO.606 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3027 OF 2005. Asrar Ahmed. ..Petitioner. v/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. .... Mr. S.G. Surana, for Petitioner. Ms. Geeta Shastri, AGP, for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Chirag Balsara, i/b. M/s. Rochi & Rochi, for Respondent Nos. 5 to 15. .... CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 1ST FEBRUARY 2010. P.C. The learned Advocate appearing for the respondent nos. 5 to 15 makes a statement that in the event of respondent nos. 5 to 15 selling the suit property to any third party, they shall inform the purchaser about the present pending writ petition. The statement is accepted. It is also clarified that this statement shall not come in the way of respondent nos. 5 to 15, in the event of the respondent nos. 5 to 15 propounding a scheme for redevelopment under DCR 33(7) of the Development Control Regulations, 1991, or otherwise, for redevelopment of the property. 2 2. In view thereof, no orders are passed in the notice of motion. Notice of motion is accordingly, disposed of. [ S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. ]