THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU W.P.No.30985 OF 2011 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking to issue writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned Final Notice bearing Roc.No.A6/12377/2011, dated 25.09.2011, issued by respondent No.1 as illegal and arbitrary, and consequently set aside the same. 2. It is stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition that the petitioner and respondent No.2 are brothers. The petitioner succeeded the house property bearing H.No.4-8-150 situated at Laskar Singaram, Hanmkonda, Warangal from his father later Jaffer and got mutated his name in the municipal records in the year 1993 and since then, he has been paying the requisite tax to the respondent Corporation. While so, respondent No.2 filed O.S.No.1245 of 2008 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Warangal for specific performance and the same is pending. On 12.05.2011, respondent No.2 issued a notice directing the petitioner to submit the documentary evidence about the ownership and title over the subject property, which was issued basing on the objection petition filed by respondent No.2 for mutation of his name in the municipal records. The petitioner issued reply on 30.05.2011 stating that his name was mutated in the municipal records after verification of all the relevant documents and that the subject matter of dispute is pending adjudication before the civil Court and requested respondent No.1 not to enter the name of respondent No.2. But respondent No.1 issued another notice, dated 14.07.2011, directing him and respondent No.2 to submit the documentary evidence. Though he issued a reply notice on 03.08.2011 and submitted entire documents on 08.08.2011, respondent No.1 again issued final notice on 20.08.2011 and 25.09.2011 directing the petitioner alone to produce valid documentary evidence otherwise, they will restore the name of respondent No.2 along with his name and further directed him and respondent No.2 to settle their civil dispute in the Court of law. Hence, the present writ petition. 3. Heard. 4. There is a dispute between the brothers in respect of mutation of the name in municipal records. Earlier, the name of Md.Tajuddin and his brother was incorporated in the municipal revenue records but later, the brother’s name of petitioner was deleted from the municipal records on the representation given by the petitioner. A final notice, dated 25.09.2011, was issued by the Corporation directing him to produce the documentary evidence in support of his claim over the subject property so as to correct the name of Md.Tajuddin instead of Md.Tajuddin and brothers within three days failing which the existing name Md.Tajuddin and brothers would be restored in the municipal records, but that is subject to final adjudication of the dispute by the competent civil Court. That order needs no interference by this Court because a title dispute is pending before the competent Court and the Civil Court has to decide the rights of the parties. The Corporation has to implement the orders that may be given by the Civil Court. Hence, there are no grounds to allow this petition and the writ petition is devoid of merit and is liable to be dismissed. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ JUSTICE K.C.BHANU 23rd November, 2011. AMD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU W.P.No.30985 OF 2011 Date:23.11.2011 AMD