^/='c^>/- s» In the Honble High Court ofJudicature ofChhattishgarh at Bilaspur (C.G.) '"°..••••:".'1^.. ^••"' ^%y<^^""...- ..••••"" C. t~y-?""~ -..•••"" •ta^^i'^fe ...•-•-" W.P. No. ^; 2006 ^•^^STl^^-" ^,es ^v se 1'"-...-- LlS*-"" Petitioner Respondents \\ •^ Sf Bhushanlal Deshmukh aged 49 years • Son of Shri Kalyansingh Deshmukh, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Village Kumhali, Tribal Block Mohala, District Durg (C.G.) Versus 1. The State Govemment ofChhattishgarh,(' . Through the Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department Ministry, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Education Officer, Mohala / District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ^\e>e.U^ j@.(j-u.£.^tl-»tfn ol^c.e-Y ^ i& p^eHt^ < R^|^£V>I(A ^(Stiw^ XI-HC-78 tlTHC^I St>*nq» 'yst -^ww^, ts'ifly'iis, Rfciiyy rf^..^£^.M/0^.W[ 200 3n^?r craqT (i^g^sc) sn^T^rf^TOi (WT 3TI^T shliift II- Roshan SBireRflfeTsn^r thfet Tribunai Shri Aiay Shrivastava, counse!| Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. Adv. l-1eard. The case of the petitioner is per e Instruction dated 24-12-98 Teachers who have passed B.T.I., ^. expenses after 22-10-64 are entitiedl passed the B. Ed. examination on certifioate to that effect is Annexure-R- benefit, ••</hereas, simiiariy situated increments under tlie orders of the Having heard learned counse| and circumstances of the case, wjtho(jt case, the petitioner is altowed to mak^ this petition raising all his grievances from today and in tum, respondent petitioner in the light of averments m41< representation atso. If respondent situated persons have been granteci| petitioner's case js also covered for g[ ofGovernment's order, then to pass c|i in accordance with law. With the direction aforesaid, th^ Parties are entitled for |for the petitioner. ]for the State on advance copy. tb rtio m^Je Nt) 'hl<lfcl<fl-1 KlinTfffst^<.Rl«K ^sri^iran^T he is working as Assistant Teacher and as ^sued by the State of M.P., the Assistant B.Ed. and M.Ed. examination on their own ]for two advanoe increments. The petitioner |his own oost in the year 1990-91 .and a 1-1, but the petittoner has not been given the (sersons have been granted two advance bunai and tfiis Court. for the parties, having regard to the facts expressing any opinion of the merit of the a detaited representation along with copy of respondent No.2 within a period of 15 days .2 is direoted to examine the oase of the by the petitioner in this petition and in the ).2 reaohes to the conclusion that simitariy Ibenefit of tvi'o advance increments and the 1'ant of two advance inorements on the basis 1'ders within a period of 3 months from today, petition stands disposed of. certifiec( copy of this order. L.C. Bhadoo Judge P.T.O.