IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.659 of 2011 RAHUL KUMAR @ RAJESH RANJAN S/O SHISHIR KUMAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MANJHAUL MATHURA MARKET, P.S. CHERIA BARIYARPUR, DISTRICT- BEGUSARAI UNDER THE GUARDIANSHIP FATHER OF THE PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ----------- 2. 07.06.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner Rahul Kumar @ Rajesh Ranjan is aggrieved against the judgment dated 30.04.2011 passed in Cr. Appeal No. 32 of 2011 whereby the order dated 15.03.2011 passed in Cheria Bariyarpur P.S. Case No. 11 of 2010 by the Juvenile Justice Board, Begusarai refusing bail to the petitioner was confirmed. The petitioner is an accused in Cheria Bariyarpur P.S. Case No. 11 of 2010 registered against Maina Singh, Manoj Singh and Mast Ram. The petitioner is thus named in the F.I.R. When the petitioner was taken into custody then he took plea that he is juvenile and on the prayer of the petitioner an inquiry was concuted by the Juvenile Justice Board, Begusarai under the provisions of Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000 2 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). After inquiry, the petitioner was declared to be juvenile by order dated 14.3.2011. Prayer for bail of the petitioner under the provisions of Juvenile Justice Act was rejected by the First Court as well as by the Appellate Court. The grievance of the petitioner is that though he has been declared juvenile by the Juvenile Justice Board then he is entitled to be released on bail and the bail can only be refused if there are enough material on the record upon which any valid inference can be drawn that the release of the petitioner would defeat the ends of justice and after release the petitioner will fall into the company of known criminal of the society. Submission is that none of the conditions were available on record and still prayer for bail has been rejected and other vital aspect of the case is that other accused persons have been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 09.09.2010 and 4.3.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. Nos. 23523 of 2010 and 2151 of 2011 respectively. Considering the fact that four co-accused persons have been granted bail and also that the petitioner has been declared to be juvenile and he is not named in the 3 F.I.R., the impugned orders are set aside and the petitioner above named is directed to be released on furnishing of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Principal Member, Juvenile Justice Board, Begusarai in connection with Cheriya Bariyarpur P.S. Case No. 11 of 2010 with condition that one of the bailors should be the father of the petitioner who will file an affidavited undertaking before the court below stating that he will ensure that after release the petitioner is not allowed to associate himself with the known criminals of the society and will not expose to moral, physical or psychological danger or his release would not defeat the ends of justice. In the result, this revision application is allowed. Ibrar/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)