•*s- B % !K?S$ E eeas lii!i>is.,£f.. B£S9 f^^Zj^^ (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF GHHATTISGARti AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION(S)NO. ^/6 12007 PETITIONERS ff?%y /^y /.voy .e' »y V ^ .•e.")^ '^ ^>^" o-/-' y -/ -<a' ^-^/^ ^•" -^ ~ ~\'' RESPONDENTS A^ Awadh Kishor Pandey S/o LateShriRamsuratPandey Ageabout46years,MeadMaster, Govt. Primary School, Pushwada, Block- Kanker, Distt. - Kanker(C.G.) 2.^ OmPrakashBhatt S/o LateShri HaridwarBhatt Age aboyt53 years, Head Master, Govt.PrimarySchool.Dhanelikanhar, Block - Kanker, Distt. - Kanker (C.G.) Vimal KumarVaishnaw S/o Late Shri Damodar DasVaishnaw Age about 49 years, HeadMaster, Govt. Primary School, Echhapur, Block - Kanker, Distt. - Kanker (C.G.) 4.^ Basant KumarGupta S/oShri RamdulareGupta Age about52 years, Head Master, Govt. PrimarySchool, Gotpur, Btack- Kanker, Distt. - Kanker(C.G.) ^ Ramtal Kuldeep S/o Shri Buddhy Ram Kuldeep Age about 51 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt.'Primary School, Ghotiya, Block - Kanker, Distt. - Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS ^ State Government of Chhattisgarh Through:- Seeretar^ Triba! & Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) (2) 2. DistriGtEducationOfficer .. Distt.-Kanker (C.G.) ^- Block Education Officer Block - Kanker, Distt. -Kanker (C.G.) 4. ^ Treasury& Accounts -Kanker(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (^' * HIGH COURT OP GHHATTtSGARH AT B1LASRJR W. P. fSl No. 616 of 2007 Petitfoiiers : Awadh Kishor Fteidey & ofhfirs Vcrsus Respondcats State ofChhattisgaA & ofhers SlngleBench; Hon'ble Mr. JusticcSatidiK. AgnUiotei. Shri Ajty Stumastava, Advocate for (he petitioDers. Shri Sudul Dubey, Govt Advocate for tfae State/respeiulents. ORDBR ( Passed on this T3*h day of PBhroaiy, 3007) Leamed counsel appeam^ for the petitioners subniits that tfae petitioiiera wcre appoiated oa flie post of Assistant Teaehers-BB fixed pay. Itis furtfaer submitted by leamed counsel for fhc petitioners that during the probation pcriod the petitioncrs wcre onty paid ffae fixcd salaxy, llioi^h fliey were entifted to get monttify pagrmenton fhe basis ofregular pay scate during that periDd. Leamed counscl fi>r ttie petitfoncra placed teUance on a decistonof fhe Madhya Pradesh State Admuustrativc Tribunal passed bn 24.8.1992 in O.A.No.2745 of 1W9 (Madhnkaut Tf^u aad 56 ofhers Vs. State of M.P. & ofhera)»Inthat case teamed Tribuual after having consideied the facts and ciKnimstmices of ffie case directed the respOBdents to make payment ofsalaay ia (he reguter scate ofpay along wifli all applicabte aDowanGes &om tte date of appointment pf fhc petitioaers. The niatter was taken-up to fee Hon'ble Supreme Court. The appealw^ disnussed by t&c Hon'bte Supreme Gourt upholdiBg fhe decision offhe Tribunalto ttte e6fe<st s. 4. 5. that fheTeachers^AssfatantTeacfaers are entitled to regular pay scate finm date ofmitial appointment Leamed counsel for fte petitioncis also pteKed reliance on the oider dated 23. 3. 2006 passed by fhis Oaurt in Writ RBtition No. 2577/2003 (Nem Singh Thafcur aad ofhera Vs. Statc of Chfaatds^rh & others) and subauts ttiatthe questfon oflaw and the facts mvolved ia tbis pctttion ace sunilar to fhat ofin the casea cited above. Leamed couiisel appearing for thc respondents fairfy conccdcs and agiees with thc subBaission Biade by the petitioners. In view of fhe above flus petitioa stends disposed of in terms of v theoiderdated 24.8.1992 passedia O.A.No. 2745/1989(supr^ and the oider dated 23. 3. 2006 passed by this Court in Writ Ptetition No. 2577/2<X)3 (supr^. No oideras to costs. Thakur Sfe Satish^I® Judge