CRM-M- No.1491 of 2011 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M- No. 1491 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : March 14, 2011 Amarjit Singh and another ..... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ...... Respondent **** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present : Mr. J.B.S. Gill, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Bhawana Gupta, DAG, Punjab, for the State. Mr. M.S. Dhami, Advocate, for the complainant. **** Alok Singh, J (Oral) This is an application seeking regular bail in case FIR No.222 dated 24.11.2009, under Sections 304-B/34 of Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Tanda, District Hoshiarpur. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that petition for regular bail qua petitioner No.1-father-in-law Amarjit Singh be dismissed as not pressed at this stage. Bail application qua petitioner No.1-father-in-law is dismissed CRM-M- No.1491 of 2011 (O&M) 2 as not pressed at this stage. Learned counsel for petitioner has argued that 1 ½ years child of the deceased is with petitioner No.2 in jail. Petitioner No.2 is the mother- in-law of the deceased. As per the ration card, residence of petitioner No.2 is separate from the deceased and her husband. Petitioner No.2 was summoned to face the trial under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that tendency to implicate all the family members cannot be ruled out. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and especially the welfare of the minor child, who is in the custody of petitioner No.2, this petition is allowed qua petitioner No.2. Let petitioner No.2 be released on bail to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. (Alok Singh) Judge March 14, 2011 Anand