N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1871/2009 [Sheikh Jafaruddin Sheikh Nijamoddin ..vs.. State of Maharashtra] IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.137/2000 (Nijamoddin Sheikh Murad..vs.. State of Maharashtra ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : S.R.DONGAONKAR, J. DATE : 18 th JUNE, 2009 Heard Shri Brahme, advocate for the applicant and Shri Sonare APP for state. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the appellant who was the father of the applicant was convicted for the offences under section 7 and 12(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, read with section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and was sentenced to suffer R.I. For one year and to pay fine of Rs.1000/-, in default to suffer R.I. for two months. The present appeal is filed against the conviction by the original appellant, and the applicant is likely to loose his father’s retirement benefits. Hence applicant wants to prosecute this appeal. The application is filed within time prescribed. No reply is filed by the state. In these circumstances the application is allowed. Name of the applicant be recorded along with the name of the appellant. Application stands disposed of. Appeal be listed in due course. JUDGE smp