IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 20TH KARTHIKA 1931 RP.No. 312 of 2000(A) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.29196/1999 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- C. KALYANIKUTTY, W/O.P.P.SREDHARAN, “VINAYAREENILAYAM” CHETHALLUR P.O., MANNARKKAD(VIA) PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE ACCOUNTANT GEENRA (A&E), AG'S OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHPAURAM. 2. STATE OF KERALA REP BY THE ECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE DEPT. GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P. NANDAKUMAR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- R.P.No.312/00 in O.P.NO.29196/1999 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of November, 2009 O R D E R By judgment dated 6th April, 2000, the Original Petition was disposed of directing that an amount of Rs.13,500/- be paid to the petitioner towards her balance PF dues. The judgment itself shows that the said amount was quantified on the basis of the statement filed on behalf of the respondents and that the amount ordered to be paid was drawn from the petitioner's PF account by an LD Clerk and that a Vigilance case was pending against him. 2. In this review petition petitioner now points out that on 27.4.1993 in addition of Rs.13,500/- a further amount of Rs.4,922/- was also drawn by the LD clerk from the petitioner's provident fund account. If as stated, there has been such a misappropriation, for the reasons stated in the judgment itself, the amount is liable to be paid to the petitioner. 3. Therefore the review petition is disposed of directing the respondents to verify the correctness of the above submission of the petitioner and on examination if it is found to be correct, the respondents are directed to pay that amount also to the petitioner. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the order before the respondent for compliance. (ANTONY DOMINIC) vi JUDGE R.P.No.312/00 :2 : vi/ ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- R.P.No.312/00 in O.P.NO.29196/1999 -------------------------------------------------- O R D E R Dated 11.11.2009