IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN TUESDAY, THE 18TH DECEMBER 2007 / 27TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 SA.No. 577 of 1996 AS.500/1994 OF SUB COURT,NEYYATTINKARA OS.235/1979 of PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF'S COURT,NEYYATTINKARA APPELLANT: APPELLANT: 2ND DEFENDANT: JOHNKUTTY SOMARAJ, RESIDING AT VATTAVILA VEEDU, KARAKKATTUVILA VADAKKEKARA PUTHEN VEEDU, PALLICHAL DESOM, -DO- VILLAGE. BY ADV. M/S .L.MOHANAN AND D.SAJEEV RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS 1 TO 11 AND 13 TO 18: PLAINTIFFS 1 TO 11 AND DEFENDANTS 3 TO 8: 1. SIVASANKARAN NAIR SUKUMARAN NAIR, THERIVILA VEEDU, ANCHAMADA MURI, ANCHAMADA VILLAGE, HAVING ALSO THORMAS VEEDU, ARUVIKKARA, MARANALLOOR DESOM -DO- VILLAGE. 2. MADHAVI PILLAI SUSEELA DEVI, -DO- -DO- 3. SIVASANKARAN NAIR RAMESAN, -DO- -DO- 4. MADHAVI PILLAI LALITHAMBIKA OF -DO- -DO- 5. SIVASANKARAN NAIR HAREENDRANATH, -DO- -DO- 6. SIVASANKARAN NAIR JAGADEVAN, -DO- -DO- 7. MADHAVI PILLAI MANORAMA, -DO- -DO- 8. SIVASANKARAN NAIR, UDAYAKUMAR, -DO- -DO- 9. KUMARI OORMILA ALIAS MOTHIBAI, -DO- -DO- 10. MADHAVI PILLAI MANGALAMBIKA, -DO- -DO- 11. SIVASANKARAN NAIR, UNNKUMARAN NAIR, -DO- -=DO- 12. CHELLAMMA PUSHPABAI, VADAKKEKARA PUTHEN VEEDU, OF -DO- -DO- 13. DAS, CALLED CHELLAKKUNJU, S/O.JOHNKUTTY, -DO- 14. JOHNKUTTY THANKARAJ, -DO- -DO- 15. MARIYAN NADAR JOSEPH, KIZHEPUTHUKOTTA PUTHEN VEEDU, METHUKUMMAL DESOM, ARUDESAPATTU VILLAGE, FROM -DO- -DO- 16. CHELLAMMA LILLYBAI, VALIYAVILA VADAKKEKARA PUTHEN VEEDU, VALLOTTUKONAM, PALLICHAL VILLAGE, -DO- DESOM. 17. A.APPUKUTTAN, TEACHER, G.H.S.KILLIPALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM FROM POOVADA MELE PUTHEN VEEDU, NARUVAMOODU, PALLICHAL DESOM, -DO- VILLAGE. R1 TO R10 BY ADV. SRI.M.RAJASEKHARAN NAYAR SMT.S.LATHIKA DEVI R13 & R15 BY ADVS. M/S.V.CHITAMBARESH SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON SRI.JIBU P THOMAS SRI.P.S.APPU THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ORDERS ON 18/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: I.A.NO.235/2007 & C.M.P.NO.1394/1996 IN S.A.NO.577/1996 DISMISSED 18/12/2007 SD/- K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE //TRUE COPY// AHZ/ K.T.SANKARAN, J. -------------------------------------------- S.A. NO. 577 OF 1996 B -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 18th December, 2007 JUDGMENT In spite of granting time to cure the defects, the appellant has not taken steps to cure the defects. Today, learned counsel for the appellant prays for further time to cure the defect. It is stated that though letter is sent to the party, he has not turned up. The request for further time is refused. The Second Appeal is dismissed for default. However, the appellant is granted one month's time to file an application for restoration of the appeal after he gets ready to take steps urgently. (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/ K.T.SANKARAN, J. ---------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- S.A..NO. 577 OF 1996 B JUDGMENT 18th December, 2007 ----------------------------------------------------