IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8254 of 2008 Biranchi Yadav son of Late Shivlal Yadav, Resident of Village-Bagraha, Police Station-Hasanpur, District- Samastipur. …. Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Collector, Samastipur. 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Rosera, Police Station-Rosera, District-Samastipur. 4. The Circle Officer, Hasanpur, Police Station-Hasanpur, District-Samastipur. 5. Ram Chandra Yadav son of Late Niklal Yadav, Resident of Village-Bagraha, Police Station-Hasanpur, District-Samastipur. …. Respondents. ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Jagdish Prasad Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, J.C. to G.V.IV. ------- 02/ 29.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This writ petition is being finally heard and decided at this stage itself at the instance of learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by pendency of Encroachment case No.09 of 2006-07 before the Circle Officer, Hasanpur, Samastipur (respondent no.4) with respect to plot nos.370 and 371 in village- Bagraha under Hasanpur Prakhand within the district of Samastipur. 3. It is quite strange that although the encroachment case has been initiated as far back as more than three years, but till date it has not been decided. 4. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this writ - 2 - petition is disposed of with a direction to the aforesaid authority concerned to dispose of the said encroachment case within two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, if not yet disposed of. Sunil (S. N. Hussain, J.)