1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5362 OF 2010 Shri Sanjay Prabhakar Mahajan & another .. PETITIONERS VERSUS Smt. Indubai Laxman Rane & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. M.M. Bhokarikar, advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Chandrakant Patil, advocate for respondent nos. 1 to 3. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 8 th SEPTEMBER, 2010. PER COURT : 1 Both the courts below have concurrently recorded finding based on appreciation of evidence placed on record that the petitioners / plaintiffs are not in possession over the disputed property. 2 I have perused the judgments recorded by both the courts below. There is absolutely no material to arrive at finding that the plaintiffs have been in possession over the disputed property. There is no merit in the petition. Petition therefore stands rejected. 2 3 Trial court is expected to decide the suit expeditiously. 4 Pending civil application, if any, does not survive and stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp5362.10.odt