FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE SECOND APPEAL NO.612 OF 2007 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:----------------------------------- Mr Vikas Shivarkar, for the appellants. Mr Milind Deshmukh, for respondent nos 1 to 4. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATED: 03.10.2007. P.C.: Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Admit, on the following questions of law: (a) Whether the defendants are liable to pay maintenance to the widowed daughter-in-law when admittedly she is residing with her own daughter and can claim maintenance from her as contemplated under section 19 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956? (b) Whether after recording findings on all the issues, the courts below were right in passing the decree of maintenance directing all the defendants to pay maintenance of Rs.1500/- each to plaintiff nos 1 and 3 from the date of suit being their moral liability to maintain them? Call for R & P. Printing is dispensed with. The appellants are directed to file a private paper book within six months from today, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed for nonprosecution without further reference to the court. Liberty to the parties to mention for fixed date of hearing only after filing of the paper book and R and P is received. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)