IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13873 of 2011 BINDESHWARI YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 05.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is apprehending her arrest in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 10 of 2011 registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioner and his two sons to have made assault to the informant by Khanti and Lathi. Subsequently the informant succumbed to injuries. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that during investigation it has come that Khanti was not used and the victim died due to injury caused by hard and blunt substances. It is further submitted that from the accusation levelled in the F.I.R., it appears that accused persons have no intention to kill the informant. Considering the age of the petitioner and the background in which the scuffle took place, let the learned court below consider all these contentions of the petitioner while considering the regular bail application of the petitioner, without being prejudiced by the order of this Court. With this observation, this application is disposed off. Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)