1 10 wp.2736.10 ndm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2736 OF 2010 Upkarya Charnya Pawar. ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent ­­­­­ None for the Petitioner. Ms. S.V.Gajare, APP for the State. ­­­­­ CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR and P.D. KODE, JJ. DATE : 27 th September, 2010. P.C. 1 This petition is received through jail. The Petitioner asserts that on the date of offence, he was a minor and a juvenile in conflict with law. This aspect has already been considered by the Sessions Court, Sangli while deciding Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 474 of 2009 vide judgment and order dated 23 rd July, 2010. The Sessions Judge has adverted to two examination reports and on the basis of opinion contained therein, has rightly inferred that it is not possible to accede to the plea of the Petitioner that on the date of commission of offence, he was below 18 years of age. That finding of fact is founded on the opinion of the doctors. It is not the case of the Petitioner that the evaluation done 2 10 wp.2736.10 by two doctors was not proper or there is manifest error committed by them. In the circumstances, the question of acceding to the Petitioner’s request of re­evaluation of his age at some other hospital does not arise. The petition is therefore, rejected. 2 Copy of this order be forwarded to the Petitioner who is in jail, forthwith. [ P.D. KODE, J ] [ A.M. KHANWILKAR, J ]