IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 29TH JUNE 2010 / 8TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 20124 of 2010(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SALIMKUMAR.K.S,AGED 42 YEARS, S/O.K.G.SREEDHARAN,RESIDING AT KEERIPATTU HOUSE, THOPPIPALA.P.O,IDUKKI DISTRICT,NOW WORKING AS ASST.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION, KATTAPPANA.P.O,IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JOICE GEORGE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,VYDHYUTHIBHAVAN, PATTOM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER,ELECTRICAL CIRCLE,THODUPUZHA,KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD OFFICE,THODUPUZH.P.O,IDUKKI DISTRICT. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,ELECTRICAL DIVISION,PEERUMEDU,OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,KSEB COLONY,PALLIKUNNU.P.O,PEERUMEDU,IDUKKI DISTRICT. STANDING COUSNEL SRI. K.S. ANIL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.20124 OF 2010 (M) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P1. According to the petitioner after he was promoted from the post of Assistant Engineer and transferred, overlooking the audit objections, the 2nd respondent made certain unauthorized payments at his risk. It is stated that such payment was illegal and therefore he cannot be held liable for the same. It is seen that aggrieved by the above, petitioner has filed Ext.P3 representation before the 2nd respondent. 2. In the nature of the dispute that the petitioner has raised, I feel that the only relief that can be given at this stage is a direction to the the 2nd respondent to deal with the petitioner's complaint. 3. Having regarding to the pendency of Ext.P3, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider the matter with notice to the petitioner and pass orders on it, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 6 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :