1 1423.11.ao IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1423 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATIOIN NO.1845 OF 2011 Mr. Abdul Gaffar Subedar ... Appellant V/s. Executive Engineer ... Respondents Mr. H. P. Pandey,for the Appellant. Mr. K. S. Patil, for the Respondents CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATED : DECEMBER 22,2011. P.C. : Since the challenge raised in this appeal from order is in respect of refusal to grant ad-interim relief by the trial Court in view of order dated 16.12.2011, this appeal from order can be conveniently disposed of by directing trial Court to dispose of pending notice of motion expeditiously. 2 It is found that the name of the Petitioner is not appearing in the list of the eligible candidate. The I. D. number of disputed structure is 98 and in respect of such structure one Shripat Ramu Thorat is held to be eligible and has been accommodated in an alternate accommodation. The disputed structure has already been demolished. 2 1423.11.ao However, according to the Respondent, some new structure is raised at the same place and it would be open for the Respondents to file appropriate reply as well as the documents in support of their contentions before the trial court. The trial court may after extending opportunity of hearing to both the sides, may proceed to dispose of pending notice of motion as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within twelve weeks from the date of receipt of writ of this order. The respondent Corporation shall be at liberty to file their written statement/ reply before the trial Court along with documents, if any. 3. With the aforesaid directions, appeal from order stands disposed of. In view of disposal of appeal from order, pending civil application does not survive and stands disposed of accordingly. (R.M.BORDE, J.)