IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 11778 of 2008. Decided on: 23.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Urmila Devi. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Ms. Kiran Dhiman, Advocate vice Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): Ms. Kiran Dhiman, Advocate appearing vice Mr. Onkar Jairath, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Consequently, the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 23, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?