1 wp7333.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No. 7333 of 2010 Smt. Parvati Baban Arde ..Petitioner v/s. Smt. Sushila Kisan Jadhav & ors. ..Respondents Mr. M.V. Thorat i/b. Pooja V. Thorat for the petitioner. CORAM:- B.R. GAVAI, J. DATED :- MARCH 03, 2011. P.C. The petitioner challenges the order dated 6th July, 2010 vide which the application filed by the present petitioner for impleading him as party defendant in a suit filed by the original defendant came to be rejected. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that plaintiff and defendants in collusion are attempting to oust the petitioner and as such he was the necessary party. 2 wp7333.10.sxw 3. The learned trial Court in the order impugned has observed that suit is between the landlord and the licensee and, therefore, the present petitioner is not concerned with it. The learned trial Court has further observed that the averments made by the applicant-petitioner gives rise to a fresh cause of action to seek injunction or any other appropriate relief against the person who has obstructed her. It can thus clearly be seen that learned trial Court himself has observed that if the petitioner so desires, she can file a suit against a person who obstruct her. 4. In that view of the matter, it cannot be said that jurisdiction that is exercised by the learned trial Court has been exercised in a perverse manner to warrant interference. Rejected. (B.R. GAVAI, J)