M— IN THE HON'BLE HIgH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (c.G.) K w.P. (QNo. @r’w [2008 ($3.) : /" Manager, aged about 36 years, S/o Shri Girdhari Khairwar, R/O' ViHage Bodsara, Tahsil—Janjgir, District-Janjgir—Champa (C.G.) PETITIONER VERSUS Ramkhiiawan Sahu, S/o Rikhi Ram, Aged about 62 years, R/o Q" Village Bodsara, Tahsii—Janjgir, district—Janjgir-Champa (C.G.)_i\i\;p\{a;.»,\;_ Radreshwar Sharan ,Singh, Aged about 65 years, S/o Chitrabhan Singh Tanwar, R/o Champa, Tahsil-Janjgir, District—Janjgir— Champa (C.G.) (3. State of Chhattisgarh through CoHector, Janjgir, District—Janjgir— Champa (C;G.) .. 133v, Prep‘tFWtJ’w‘ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1.”- Q having a right to be heard, Since he was not arrayed as a pany, therefore, the order passed by the Board of Revenue is illegal and deserves to be set aside. Having heard the counsel appearing for the petitioner and having perused the order impugned, I do not find any substance in the petition. The dispute was between the State and land owner which was subsequently resolved by the order of Board of Revenue (EX. P/l ). The land which was not finally vested in favour of State, allotment of which would be subject to decision of final authority. If the order of final authorities goes against the State then petition will get nothing. The dispute was between the State and the land owner. The petitioner was neither necessary party nor proper party, therefore, the order passed by the Board of Revenue is just and proper and needs no interference. For the reasons mentioned hereinabove, the petition fails and the same is accordingly dismissed. No order asto costs. X‘ A Man$ ,, V an in“ A Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge ahu