1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Civil Appln. (cas) No. 395 of 2011 (In Second Appeal No. 132/08) Subhash s/o Rambhau Sawarkar ...Versus... Rambhau s/o Pandit Sawarkar & anr. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr.Samudra Singh h/f Adv. Mrs. M.A. More Advocate for the appellant. Mr. O.W. Gupta Advocate for Res. no.1. Mr. S.V. Sohoni Advocate for Res. no.2. ... CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 05.05.2011. Parties with their respective counsel are present before the Court. Applicant Subhash s/o Rambhau Sawarkar is identified by Mr.Gupta, learned counsel for respondent no.1. Subhash is son of Anusayabai. The application (C.A.S. 395/11) for compromise is signed by the learned counsel for the parties so also by the parties. Parties are ready to compromise the dispute arising in S.A. No. 132 of 2008 as per the terms mentioned in the application. Having heard learned counsel for the rival parties and having gone through the terms of compromise, I am satisfied that compromise decree deserves to be passed to put an end to 2 the dispute. Hence, this civil application is allowed. Second Appeal No. 132/08 is disposed of in terms of the compromise mentioned in Civil Application No. 395 of 2011. Compromise decree be drawn up accordingly. The compliance required to be made under the compromise shall be reported to the Registry by filing acknowledgment/receipt. Judge /TA/