IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.6528 of 2005 Between: Debariki Pydi Raju, S/o. Pyoliyya, D.No. 56-8-7, Golla Kancharapalem, Visakhapatnam. ..... PETITIONER AND The Registrar, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam - 17. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent in notifying the same vacancy of gardener which was notified earlier and selected, vide Advt. No. NTS3/11/2005, dated 4-3- 2005 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to legitimate expectations, Consequently directly the respondent herein to proceed with the selection pursuant to the earlier notification issued in year 2001 and appoint the petitioner as gardener. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. S.A.RAZAK Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. P.B. VIJAY KUMAR The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: It is submitted that the notification, which is sought to be challenged in the writ petition, has already been withdrawn by the respondents. In view of the same, nothing survives for adjudication in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. However, this order will not preclude the authorities from considering the case of the petitioner, if he is already selected. 28-4-2005 prk ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Registrar, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam - 17. 2. CD copies.