© $3§§E§i§ gEé‘éQErg @ IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P. c No. a w9 12010 f; PETITIONER : Pradeep Singh S/o Jagpaxl Singh aged about 21 years, R/o Near Aruna Public School, Vishrampur, Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) VERSUS / RESPODNENTS :1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Technical Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (0G) y” 2- Secretary, ' Department of Technical Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3- Chhatisgarh Swami~ Vivekanand Technical University, Through Registrar, Bhilai, Distt. Durg (C.G.) #s Registrar, Chhatisgarh Swami Vivekanand Technicai University, Bhilai, Distt. Durg (Ci'G.) 5- Institute of Technology, Korba (C.G.) Through its Principal, Korba (C.G.) "§E@H C$L§R’¥ @F €3§'§E‘§A’§?§$$§k§%§-§ £3? §§LM%§’§S% “m §R§7 @E‘Hi‘aQM §i3 Q, €2§$ it??? i§’%?§ ‘ N 2 F"~%§%E@m§ ?ras:£eeép Eimgh Vaz’sw Siae of .J?3i‘gatfi$garh & Oihers WRW PET§?§GN UNSER ARHCLE 225f227 OF THE SONSTITUT§ON CF IND‘A €33 : Hm’hie ME: $a§§gk§ K. Agmhmm, $3 if @a’esgm v:— Sha’i Keshav Gupta, Advacate far the petiténner. Em NNRay, Pami Lawyer fa; the State. $REE§ §GR§§L§ - (Pwsed er: 2?“ ciay a? Gctabex 2&6) 1. Leameci caunsei appearing faf ihe getimnar seeks certain mfarmaiion from we mspanéen’: No.4 by i‘n‘rs wvit peii‘tion fiied umdar Sesimn 226 of the Cans%iiuiiom af inQéa‘ 2. The Righi m {hformatmn Act, 2QC35 {\for Shaft “me AC‘L‘, 2GO5") ha$ bea‘x bmught mic force is enabie i‘ne ciiizen a? this ceumw t0 Saek. mfmmatim from the offices by making awiicafion m the aomwien? , amim'riims, ass pmscribed under the Act, 2905. The Act, 2DDS, §3 a sgema’i éc‘i mad ’ihe aui‘mriiiea $13 examine §egaiity and vai‘id‘iw a? E, the Qrziar passed by i‘ne ¥n€e¥maii0n Dmcef 9f the ccncemed affine have been previded in the Act i’ieeh’ and ihere ie a§ea e prevision fer eéepoeai of 'the apphce‘eahel pe‘xmehe whhin the epecif¥ed iime. in ihe”: eveht ho wit ‘ie mainiaihaha 3. in the case on hand} the pehheher made era eppiiceheh to the ‘Regisifari Chhattiegem Swami Vivekehend Teehhicai UNx/erei‘w! mepondeht No.4 f0¥ eupgiy of a copy of answer booke under ihe z Aei, 2GG53 Thereafier, *Ene ihe€e§d of go‘mg i0 ehpeheie aui‘noh‘iy ahd ihereafier to the Chief informaiioh Commiseioaer,’ {he \\ peiihoher has direchy approached ihie Cour? \\\\\\ [Q Learned ccun'se: further submits that the petitioner has taken recourse is this forum; as go‘ing ’(0 the infarmatmn Commisgioner or appetiate authority; may take Some time; Whtch ‘ie no gmund; as ihe $§3eciai Ac? has been wasted fer ihe purpose of suppiy of informa‘iion on the request m’ siiizen of ihis country The peiiticne: has mi shown ariy materiei to esiab§ish a fao‘é ihai some ex‘araordinary circumstances exist, Whieh necessr‘iate filing ef this petiiion; as petitiener, if appeam has not gone io ihe appeiéaie authorities under the provisions of the Act, 2C3G5. tn View of the above} thie petition ie not maintainabte and ts hereey dism‘aeeed at the matter; stage iteetti Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge aehok