WP(C) 3680/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C. UPADHYAY Heard Mr. Inam Uddin, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Ms. P. Chakrabort y, learned Standing Counsel, Social Welfare Department. The grievance of the petitioners is that the petitioners were applicants for ap pointment to the post of Anganwadi Worker and Helper at No.96 Dakhin Kachari Par a Centre under Jugijan ICDS project, Hojai, Nagaon. The petitioners claim that t he private respondent, who has been selected as Anganwadi Worker, does not belon g to the place, where the Anganwadi Centre is located. As the dispute, raised by the petitioners, is substantially factual in nature, t his Court is of the view that in the facts and circumstances of the present case , respondent No.2 i.e. the Director of Social Welfare, Government of Assam, shal l look into the grievances of the petitioner and make enquiry in this regard, an d in accordance with the findings of the inquiry, pass appropriate orders. Whats oever decision is reached, in this regard, by respondent No.2, on the petitioner s’ grievances, shall be communicated, in writing, to the petitioners and if the petitioners feel aggrieved by the decisions, which may be reached, or the orders , which may be passed by respondent No.2, the petitioners shall remain at libert y to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. The whole exercise, so directed, shall be completed within a period of two month s from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by respondent No.2. The petit ioners may furnish to respondent No.2 a certified copy of this order along with a copy of the writ petition and annexures thereto. Furnish a copy of this order to the learned counsel for the respondents. This writ petition stands disposed of in terms of the above observations and dir ections.