IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.4451 of 2001 Date of Decision.28.03.2012 Anil Kumar son of Sh. Rajpal resident of Bagichi Mohalla, Valmiki Chowk, District Fatehabad .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will be satisfied if the representation issued by the petitioner under Annexure P-4 is considered by the respondents and an appropriate decision is taken within a particular time. 2. The respondents are directed to consider the representation made by the petitioner under Annexure P-4 and an appropriate decision shall be taken within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order. 3. The writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission dispensing with notice to the respondents. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE March 28, 2012 Pankaj*