IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 3755 of 2011 Date of decision: 25.05.2011 Mela Ram. ...Petitioners. Versus. State of H.P. & others. ...Respondents. Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph,C.J. The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma,J. ________________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Mohan Singh, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. AG with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG, for respondents No. 1 and 2.. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner apprehends that the second respondent will effect the mutation in violation of Annexure P-3, order passed by the Civil Court. The petitioner is also a party to the proceedings before the second respondent, therefore, it is for him to bring to the notice of the second respondent the order passed by the Civil Court and the effect thereof. Necessarily the second respondent has to look into the matter while passing the orders. Equally, it is open to the petitioner to move to the Civil Court as well for appropriate relief. 2. The petition is disposed of accordingly. A duly authenticated copy be supplied to the parties. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice (Justice V.K. Sharma) Judge 25th May, 2011 (jai/virender)