vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.495 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.495 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.495 OF 2008 The Bombay Dyeing & Manufacturing Co. LTd. (Polyester Plant) ... Petitioner V/s. The Grocery Markets & Shops Board for Greater Mumbai, Thane & Raigad District & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.C.U. Singh, Sr.Adv. with A.K. Jalisatgi for Petitioner Mr.Rahul Nerlekar for Respondent Nos.1, 2 & 3 Mr.S.S. Pakale for Respondent No.4 Mr.V.S. Gokhale, AGP, for Respondent No.5 CORAM: J.N. PATEL & J.N. PATEL & J.N. PATEL & SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. MHATRE, JJ. MHATRE, JJ. DATED: FEBRUARY 7, 2008 FEBRUARY 7, 2008 FEBRUARY 7, 2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The affidavit in reply filed by Respondent No.4 is taken on record, copy of which is furnished to the other side. Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the Petitioner states that the grievance of the petitioner stands resolved in view of the affidavit and the petitioner would not like to prosecute the petition further. It is stated that presently the Board has supplied 46 registered Mathadi workers and that since the Board had made a statement that it would supply additional registered workers, if so required by the petitioner in future, the petitioner’s grievance stands resolved. : 2 : 2. The learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.1 Board states that they are not at issue on this aspect and that as and when required, the Board would be able to provide additional hands to the petitioner company. 3. In view of this statement, as the grievance of the petitioner does not survive, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the petition. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Needless to say that the issues which have been raised in the matter are not adjudicated upon by this Court and therefore, in absence of any decision, no prejudice is caused to the parties in the matter. (J.N. PATEL, J.) (SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.)