IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-23206 of 2009 Date of Decision: February 10, 2010 Farukh .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.83 dated 18.3.2009 under Sections 395, 412 IPC, Police Station, Sadar, Palwal. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that even as per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have purchased the truck that was subject matter of dacoity by co- accused (non petitioners). The petitioner is alleged to have further sold the truck. Crl. Misc. No. M-23206 of 2009 [2] This aspect of the case has not been disputed by learned counsel for respondent- State, on instructions from Abbas Khan, Assistant Sub Inspector. Considering the fact that the petitioner has been in custody since 26.5.2009; the petitioner has not committed dacoity and has indulged in purchase of the goods and further sale, the petition is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. Heavy surety. (AJAI LAMBA) February 10, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?