IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Misc. No.23642 of 2009 RELIANCE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD - Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR- Opposite Parties ==================================================== 2. 07.07.2011 The complainant-petitioner has preferred this revision application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to opposite party no.2 vide order dated 2.02.2009 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Patna in A.B.P.No.856/09 in connection with Gandhi Maidan P.S.Case No.286 of 2008 under Sections 406, 409, 420, 467 and 468 of I.P.C. Heard Mr. Amaresh Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that during the hearing of aforesaid anticipatory bail application, it was raised by the accused opposite party that a cheque of rupees two lacs was issued in favour of the petitioner and the accused-opposite party was ready to pay the amount in 20 installments. In view of the 2 submission, the anticipatory bail was granted whereas the allegation against the accused- opposite party is that more than five lacs rupees was defaulcated by him (accused- opposite party) and in this view of the matter, the accused has suppressed the fact before the learned Sessions Judge. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State and on perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the contention raised by the petitioner can better be appreciated by the learned Sessions Judge, who has passed the impugned order. In this view of the matter, this petition stands disposed of. V.K.Pandey (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)