1 Lrs IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No.2352 OF 2009 Mr Salim Nijamsc Zari ..Petitioner. vs. State of Maharashtra and ors. ..Respondents. Mr A.M. Joshi, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr C.R.Sonawane, A.G.P., for respondent Nos.1 and 2 Mr N.V.Bandiwadekar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 and 4. CORAM: D.K. DESHMUKH AND K.K.TATED,JJ DATED: 2nd DECEMBER,2009 P.C.:- 1. The grievance of the petitioner in this petition is that the Management of the school where he is working has passed a resolution for appropriate pay fixation of the petitioner. But the 2 Headmaster of the school is not doing pay fixation. Copy of the resolution is annexed to this petition which does not show that there was any duty cast on the Headmaster to do the fixation. On the contrary, that resolution contemplates proposal for pay fixation of the petitioner being sent to the Education Officer. By this petition the only relief claimed is that the Headmaster should be directed to do pay fixation. Under what power the Headmaster has to do, it has not been explained anywhere. By which the statute duty is caste on the Headmaster to do is not explained anywhere. If the Headmaster is not obeying directions of the Management, in our opinion right remedy is not to approach this Court for enforcing decision of the Management. It appears that the petitioner had also approached the School Tribunal and withdrawn the application made to the School Tribunal. We find that the petitioner is just hopping from one forum to other. In our opinion, this is a clear misuse and abuse of the process of the law. The writ petition 3 is, therefore, rejected. (D.K. DESHMUKH,J) (K.K.TATED,J)