IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.15112 of 2010 Date of Decision : August 24, 2010. Bobby .....Petitioner versus Union of India and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Jasandeep Singh Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The father of the petitioner was working as a Sewerman in the Civil Division of Engineering Department of the PGIMER, Chandigarh. It appears that he was removed from service vide order dated 2.12.1999 (Annexure P-1) on the allegations of being absent from duty. The father of the petitioner, however, represented for his reinstatement and also sought the release of salary and other admissible dues. Meanwhile, the petitioner's father unfortunately passed away on 12.11.2007. The petitioner thereafter made several representations including dated 16.6.2010 (Annexure P-6) for the release of the service benefits to which his deceased father was entitled to under the Rules. No decision appears to have been taken on those representations so far. C.W.P.No .15112 of 2010 2 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, however, without expressing any views on the merits of the petitioner's claim, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent Nos.2 to 4 to consider the representation dated 16.6.2010 (Annexure P-6) said to have been made by the petitioner, and dispose of his pending claims by passing a speaking order, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. August 24, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE