FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CA 12687/2004 IN R.C. 1636/2003 CA 12686/2004 IN R.C. 1636/2003 CA 12688/2004 IN R.C. 1628.2003 CA 12689/2004 IN R.C. 1628/2003 CA 12690/2004 IN R.C. 1637/2003 CA 12691/2004 IN R.C. 1637/2003 CA 12692/2004 IN R.C. 1629/2003 CA 12693/2004 IN R.C. 1629/2003 . In this group of civil applications, with Rejected Cases, we have heard learned A.G.P. None appears for the Respondent. . This group of civil applications, seeks permission to remove office objections. It appears that the first appeals were filed on behalf of the State through Special Land Acquisition Officer, Jalgaon. In all these appeals, after their filing, Registry of this Court had raised various objections. The objections were notified. Time permissible was also granted. Objections were not removed. The Registry of this Court, therefore, passed an order refusing registration of the appeals. In this group of eight matters, there are various and different dates of passing of the orders. End result is that, registration of the first appeals was refused by the Registry of this Court. All these orders are challenged in this civil application. Prayer made in all these civil applications is similar, seeking permission to remove the office objections raised by the Registry in the first appeals. Indisputably, these applications are filed beyond the period of limitation. This Court had earlier issued notice. No reply has been filed on behalf of the Respondents. None appear for the Respondents. Registration has been refused by the Registry FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. of this Court at the threshold of the proceedings. Awards passed by the Reference Court are of the year 2001. At this stage learned counsel holding for learned counsel Mr. C. K. Shinde, who appears for the Respondent appears in the Court. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, in our view, permission needs to be granted for removing the office objections by the Applicant. . In this view of the matter, we are permitting the Applicants to remove the office objections, on or before 13th July, 2009. In case of failure on the part of the Applicant to remove the office objections, the applications shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution, without back reference to this Court. . Delay condoned. Refusal of registration orders are set aside and the Civil Applications accordingly allowed and disposed of. [S. S. SHINDE, J.] [S. B. DESHMUKH, J.] Dated:15.06.2009 ans/12697