IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25880 of 2008 RAMANUJ RABIDAS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 22.9.2008 Heard. The case has been registered under Sections 25 and 26(II)of the Arms Act. The allegation is that the petitioner was found running a workshop for assemblage of illegal arms. The partly made arms, the instruments or some articles to be used in creating ammunitions were seized as per the seizure memo Annexure-2. The contention is that the Sergeant Major who inspected the seized articles did not find any of them dangerous to human life or fit enough to be used as an effective arms. The second contention was that, none of the family members, if not the petitioner, was handed over the copy of the seizure memo. It was contended that the very facts of the case indicate as if there could be some tinge of fabrication in the story, this is too early to enter into the factual dispute as appearing from the contention as regards the nature of seized articles, their effectiveness or the question of the case being a fabrication, I do not find any acceptable and convincing reasons for the police officers to have foisted a false case. Petition is dismissed. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )