sfKS W l<(-)i+ ^^ STI^I S»l*1iqi rt-C <; ^^ ^ET •<<i<ii<-i<i, yTil^'Kc, fiidiyy,< iirawa^ra?"""" """"""" """""w^200 3fI^?I'cra^ ( t'lf^'k*') TOIIW ^rf?g 311^1 W.P.f PETITIONER: RESPONDENTS: jy ct)i1!i<i<n<ili ^wfil' ^f l^st <fyFi-^i-(, ^sifinaiit?! ^No.5421/2QQ8 R.L. Bhardwaj, Son of Shri Parsuram. Bhadwaj, aged about 48 years, presently posted as a Principal, Govenunent Boys Higher Secondary School, Katghora, District Korba (CG), resident of Jail Road, Katgliora, District :Korba (CG) -Versus- State of Chhattisgarh, fbrough: the Seci^tary, Tribal Developnient Departtaent, D.K.S. Bhawaii Raipur, (CG) Dy. Secretary, Govenunent of Chhattisgarli, Tribal Developiaent Departm.en.t, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (CG) The ^ Coininissioner, Tribal Developiaent Departinent, Raipur (CG) 4. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Deyelopiaent Departm.ent, Korba (CG) Vijay Kuinar Lahare, Priacipal, Govenunent Girls Higher Secondaiy School, Preui Nagar, District :Sarguja (CG) ^^? 193 vss "Tffl ^HC—78 |i^j^:N^ IS'fijti |stt^3Tli^'llsb*li<* •a '3^r'<11<ll(rt<1,snil+l<l<o, [°<dl'ylj,< *11*iyil g,»||q,— • ••—•••• ••••••••••••••-•^p^200 •3II^?TTl^7 ('jclf^'t^tl) l^IIW flfel STI^I Wiit Petition under Arti. Siaisde Bench: Hoa' jle 226 offhe Constitution of India) ble Shrl Dhirendra Mishra, J. ShriV.K. Pandey, couns( Shri Arun Sao, No.l to4. Heard. The petitioner had filed| against his transfer order of A^ froin Govemment Higher Sec Higher Secondary School, B| petition was disposed of with| representation before con(f representation vide Annexiire-[ paragraph-6 that post of School, Taaakhar is vacant puipose of the petitioner wcj tran.sferred to Govenuinent Learaed counsel for the| brought fhis iliconsistency i|i representation of Aniiexur^- concerued authority has not 4: Slibiiutted that fhe responder(' ^ ^Fifwft^t'wwif 'if fs^St <^(<K iiaffinOT^t ;1 for fhe petitioner. GovemDJient Advocate for tlie State/respondents |W.P.(S5No.3898/2008 before this Court [uiexure-P/8 whereby he was transferred t>ndary School Katghora to Goveminent ^saatpiu-, District Raigarb. The said liberly to the petitioner to file detailed 'med authorifr. While decidini P/ 1 dated 12-9-2008, itwas observed m in Goveminent Higher Seoondaiy aad if the petitioner is posted fhere, 'uld be served. However, he has been her Secondaiy School Ghordeva. petitioner submitted that he has ah-eady the order dated 12-9-2008 vide his -P/10 dated 16-9-2008. However, onsidered the above representa.tion. He ts inay be further direeted to reconsider Pril|icipal Hidher ila -381 •I-E XI-HC—78 an^rw R-li* TOT 3)T^?I *t< a- BsTve ^^ "4Ni<v)<<, ®ii1-H'i(o,[s<di-Liy,< NI*1CTI y,»||q,- •——••-—•-—•••— •—^^200 sn^T Ti^i' (lic<f^8i<(t) ^aiWRfcrsti^i nis representation ia the ligh Annexure-F'/'lO. Leamed coiuisel for tl: Aaiitexwe; E/10 subniitted by \vithin a period ofSweeks by 1 !a view of the above sub parties, the in.staiit petition is; No. 1 to consider fhe applicatiq pass appropriate order ^vitMn ^ii<i[cT*(iTi ^itt^i'i* "^f f®l<n^f^i^K ^?3lfira3T^I ^t of his application dated 16-9-2008 of ^e State subiaitted tliat appUcation of the petitioner shaU be agaia considered ^he conceraed ailfhority. Imission niade by leamed counsel for tfae |disposed ofwith direction.to respondent |a ofthe petitioner ofAnnexui^-P/10 and h period of3 weeks. ^