IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 310 OF 2010 MRS. ALINA DA SILVA E DA SOUZA ... Petitioner Versus STATE THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY ... Respondent Mr. Anthony D'Silva, Advocate for the Petitioner. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 4th May, 2010 P.C.: Heard. 2. There is no dispute that the property sought to be sold and for which permission in terms of Article 1488 was sought, is situated within the jurisdiction of the learned Civil Judge Senior Division at Mapusa, before whom the said application was filed. 3. Counsel on behalf of the petitioner has placed reliance on the decisions reported in 2008 (1) GLR 531 and AIR 2007 SC 1077. Whether the Civil Judge, Senior Division at Ponda who finalised the inventory proceedings by virtue of which the subject property was allotted to the mother who since expired and to the son on whose behalf the application was filed, had nothing to do with the jurisdiction of learned Civil Judge, Senior Division at Mapusa. Consequently, the impugned order is hereby set aside and learned Civil Judge, Senior Division is hereby directed to dispose of the application filed under Article 1488 of the P.C.P.C. in accordance with law. N. A. BRITTO, J. NH