IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.294 of 2010 BIJAN YADAV, SON OF MAHENDRA YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 05/04/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 364A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the son of the Informant was kidnapped by unknown persons. One Abu Jaffar was apprehended on the basis of phone calls he had made from the Mobile of the victim boy. The said Abu Jaffar disclosed the name of one Rajesh Yadav, the brother of the petitioner as being the person who had given him the Mobile phone. The said victim was also recovered on his pointing out. At that place, two persons were arrested namely the present petitioner and his brother Rajesh Yadav. This circumstance is enough to show the complicity of the petitioner in the present occurrence. In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it positively within nine months in view of the seriousness of the nature of the offence. The trial court is also directed to take all effective steps to ensure the attendance of the co-accused persons if they have not been arrested or if they have been released on bail. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)