^u ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH Applicant > CRIMINAL REVISIQN N0, f / £> OF 2006 Yogya Kuniar S/o Chandulal Satnami, Aged about 32 years, Gram- Kharora O-^ ...-»^ Tahsil 85 Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) ^^>-:..- . ,,^^VERSUS y-" N^in-applicarift K.t^ State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station- •Kharora, Distt.Raipur(C.G..) CRIMINAL REVISION^-UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITHSECTION WfOF THE CODE OF_CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 -HC—78 RW^I wn ani^i »*)!•+ •2- *11*ICTS a»*(T<*> 3Sr ^|<1!dq, ®T)1<-1'IS,fqcliyy ':i.:.fe^..&l^.l.l.fc/ 311??C^5R? •renwffltaan^i S.B: HON'BLE JUSTICE MR. 03.02-2010: Mr. Sanjay Agrawal, Mr. Vaibhav A. Gover Mr. Puneet Ruparei, Appellant nameiy Smt. Nirmala Bai are their respective counsei. presetit dounsel for the applicant. ihan, counsel for the respondent/State. dounsel for the complainant. Kumar and the complainant namely in person and they are identified by Yo^ya Joint aDDSication i.e. parties under Sections 320^ Procedure, respectively for p] The aforesaid applicj affidavits of the parties. It compromised the dispute pressure from anyone and H betweenthem. In this view of the md allowed and the compromise| entered into. The resu!t of this applicant of the offence pun Penal Code. Ordered accord •^i^d^'l fffl^ ^ ^^ <t^t^R ^SifOT 311^1 R1TINKER DIWAKER I.A. No. 01/2009 has been filed by the ') and 320 (6) of the Code of Criminal |ermission to compound the offence. ^tion has been du!y supported by the stated that the parties have amicably iutside the court without any fear or i^nceforth they will not have any dispute ia|tter, the appiication mentioned above is |desired by the parties is permitted tQ be coijipromise wou!d be the acquittat of the Ishabie under Section 354 of the Indian Ing'y- _ -—-- Sd/- pritinker Diwaker Judge