IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2949 of 1986 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.D.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? ( No.1 to 5 NO) -------------------------------------------------------------- LALIT EMPLOYEES' UNION Versus LALIT STAINLESS STILL (INDIA) LTD. -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR JIVANLAL G SHAH for Petitioner M/S TRIVEDI & GUPTA for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.D.DAVE Date of decision: 28/08/98 ORAL JUDGEMENT I have heard Ld. counsel Mr. H.J. Shah for the petitioner and Ld. counsel Mr. Y.H. Vyas appearing for Ld. counsel M/s. Trivedi & Gupta for the respondent. Upon hearing Ld. counsels aforementioned, and the perusal of the prayer claimed in the petition, it appears that the present petition requires to be disposed of as having become infructuous. I order accordingly. Petition stands disposed of. Rule shall stand discharged. Interim releif shall stand vacated. No costs. Any how, upon a plea coming from Ld. counsel Mr. Shah for the petitioner, I would say that the liberty is reserved for the petitioner to come out with a fresh petition, if the circumstances so demand in future. ----- /vgn.