IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.239 of 2009 1. Jitendra Kumar, son of late Ram Dayal Singh 2. Nago Kuer wife of late Ram Dayal Singh, both residents of village Bhakharua, P.O. and P.S. Daudnagar, District Aurangabad. …Defendants-Petitioners-Petitioners. Versus 1. Jugeshwar Singh, son of late Badri Yadav, resident of village Bhakharua, P.O. and P.S. Daudnagar, District Aurangabad. ...Defendant-Opposite party 1st set-Opposite party 1st set. 2. Sri Ram Kewal Singh, son of Fakiri Yadav 3. Sri Charitar Singh 4. Sri Gaya Singh 5. Sri Ramchandra Singh Nos. 3 to 5 sons of late Mohan Singh 6. Sri Vijay Singh 7. Sri Arunjay Singh 8. Sri Uday Singh 9. Sri Sunil Singh 10. Sri Anil Singh Nos. 6 to 10 sons of late Ramdeo Singh 11. Sri Ram Ashray Singh 12. Sri Laloo Singh Both sons of late Gudri Singh 13. Sri Sheo Narayan Singh 14. Sri Chhedi Singh Both sons of late Ramdeo Singh 15. Sri Bandhu Singh 16. Sri Janeshwar Singh Both sons of late Ram Lochan Singh All are residents of village Bhakharua, P.O. and P.S. Daudnagar, District Aurangabad. …Defendants-Opposite Parties 2nd set-Opposite parties 2nd set. 17. Sri Krishna Singh 18. Sri Prayag Singh 19. Sri Hardeep Singh 20. Sri Jagdish Singh Nos. 17 to 20 sons of late Ram Ratan Singh 21. Most. Manmati Kuer, wife of late Ram Ratan Singh, All residents of village Bhakharua, P.O. and P.S. Daudnagar, District Aurangabad. ..Plaintiffs-Opposite Parties 3rd set-Opposite parties 3rd set. 2 For the petitioners : Mr. Dhrub Narayan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Jitendra Prasad Singh, Advocate. For the opposite parties : None. ----------- 06/ 02.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. This petition has been filed for review of order dated 10.07.2009 by which this court dismissed C.R. No.265 of 2007. The said civil revision was filed by defendants- petitioners challenging order dated 11.01.2007 by which learned Subordinate Judge-III, Aurangabad, allowed defendant no.2- opposite party no.1 to repair the wall in question on the basis of report submitted by the Advocate Commissioner in Partition Suit No.152 of 1999 (108/2006). This court does not find any error apparent on the face of the record nor does it find any fresh material to take a different view. Accordingly, this civil review petition is dismissed. harish/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )