IN THE HIGH CORUT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 626 of 2009 (M/S) Smt. Ramwati ……….. Petitioner. Versus Ved Pal & others. ………. Respondents Mr. Lok Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Hon’ble V.K. GUPTA, C.J. After hearing Mr. Lok Pal Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and upon perusal of the judgments of the learned Trial Court as well as the learned Appellate Court, I find that the learned Appellate Court has not erred in remanding the matter to the learned Trial Court. In the concluding part of the impugned Judgment, the learned Appellate Court has directed the learned Trial Court to appoint a Commissioner for spot inspection and has also ordered that, in the meanwhile, status quo shall be maintained by the parties on spot. By an inadvertent omission, the learned Appellate Court has not specifically directed the learned Trial Court to dispose of afresh the Temporary Injunction Application in the light of the report of the Commission. I rectify that error and direct the learned Trial Court to dispose of the Temporary Injunction Application in the light of the report of the Commission and after hearing the parties. The writ petition is dismissed. (V.K. Gupta, C. J.) 29.04.2009 G