1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5636 OF 2009 Union of India & Ors., .. Petitioners. V/s. Vinod Kumar Kannojeya .. Respondent. Mr.Sureshkumar, for the Petitioners. Mr.G.S.Walia, for the Respondents. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & R.M.SAVANT, JJ. DATED: 15th SEPTEMBER, 2009. P.C. 1. Heard Advocate for the Petitioners. 2. The Respondent who belongs to the Schedule Caste, was appointed as a Bungalow Peon in the Railways. He was working with the Chief Commercial Manager (PS), who took voluntarily retirement. The services of the Respondent was terminated on the ground that the person with whom he was working has voluntarily retired. 3. The Central Administrative Tribunal considered the said aspect of the matter and for reasons mentioned in the impugned order has allowed the original application. We have perused the reasons given by the CAT. We do not find any fault with the reasoning given by the CAT. srj/- 2 4. In our view, the CAT has properly analyzed the matter. We, therefore, do not find any merits in the above Petition. 5. Petition is, therefore, disposed of with no order as to costs. (R.M.SAVANT,J.) (S.B.MHASE,J.) srj/-