-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.834 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.834 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.834 OF 2005 IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO.60 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.60 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.60 OF 2006 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Ms V.S.Dighe for the Applicant Mr.J.J.Xavier for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 Mr.Rajkumar R. Mishra for R.Nos.3 to 5 CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: MARCH 24, 2006. MARCH 24, 2006. MARCH 24, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate for the parties. It is an admitted position that during the pendency of the suit in the City Civil Court, no interim relief was granted in favour of the Applicant. Hence, the Applicant is not entitled to interim relief. 2. However, it is made clear that all actions which may be taken by the Respondents in respect of the suit structure will be subject to the final outcome of the First Appeal. -2- Judge. Judge. Judge.