IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3302 OF 2010 Between : N.Anand ... PETITIONER A N D K.Ram Prasad …RESPONDENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 3302 OF 2010 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition,s under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the docket order, dated 29.06.2010, in I.A.No.115 of 2009 in O.S.No.6 of 2007 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Anantapur, whereunder and whereby, the application filed under Section 151 C.P.C. to order for joint trial of O.S.Nos.7 and 5 of 2007 along with O.S.No.6 of 2007, was dismissed. 2. Heard. 3. There cannot be any dispute that clubbing of several suits arise when the cause of action as well as the subject matter is one and the same so that conflict of decisions can be avoided. Therefore, all the suits can be tried together to avoid multiplicity of proceedings. In all the suits, the parties i.e., the plaintiffs and defendants, are same. But, however, the defendant took an objection that the material alteration with regard to the promissory notes are different and cause of action is also different in all the suits. 4. In view of the fact that the cause of action and defence in all the suits are shown to be different, the trial Court shall try all the above suits separately and dispose of simultaneously, so that the defendant can put forward his defence in all the suits. Further, if this procedure is followed, conflict of decisions can be avoided. 5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of directing the trial Court to take evidence independently and separately in all the suits and dispose of all the suits simultaneously. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ K.C.BHANU. J NOVEMBER 08, 2010. YVL