- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3292/2009 Sujata Punjo Bharambe. ...Petitioner.. Versus The Asst.Manager, (H.R.M.), “Dena Bank”, Mumbai & two others. ...Respondents... ..... Shri A.P. Yenegure, Advocate for petitioner. ..... CORAM: V.C.DAGA & A.V. POTDAR,JJ. DATE: 15.07.2009 PER COURT: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is seeking to claim ex-gratia payment from the bank. The bank has given reasoned replies, first on 17.8.2007 and thereafter to the Advocate of the petitioner on 4.12.2007. The bank has given the reasons for holding the petitioner disentitle to claim the said benefit. The learned - 2 - counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that while calculating the amount, the loan liabilities should have been taken into account. The submission made is mis-placed. We do not find any fault with the view taken by the bank. The petition is without any substance. The same is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (A.V. Potdar,J.) (V.C. Daga, J.) ndk/c157098