IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1490 of 2006 RAJESH MEHTA Versus MADHUSUDAN MISHRA & ANR ----------- 2 28.11.2008 No one appears for the petitioner. The impugned order rejecting the prayer of the defendant-petitioner to exhibit certain documents into evidence, which were not filed by him at the stage of framing of the issues on 19.8.1995, does not suffer from any jurisdictional error. The Court below has examined this aspect at length and its reasoning that almost after ten years the defendant-petitioner could not be permitted to bring on record certain documentary evidence which were never revealed by him much less filed at the time of framing of the issues, does not require any interference by this Court. Accordingly, this Civil Revision application being wholly misconceived is hereby dismissed. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)