1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR S.B. Crl. Revision Petition No.310/2010 (Rameshwar Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of Order : 26.03.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARI Mr.Mukesh Singh for Mr.Biri Singh Sinsinwar, for the petitioner. Mr.Laxman Meena, PP. By the Court: By this petition, a challenge has been made to the order dated 25.02.2010. It is submitted that an application was moved for seeking expert opinion in regard to the voice recorded to show that prosecutrix had agreed to withdraw the case, provided a land in dispute is given to her. The learned Court below dismissed the said application. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the expert opinion in regard to voice recorded goes in the root of case. The prosecutrix agreed to settle the matter provided land is made in her name, however, the Court below without considering the aforesaid, dismissed the application. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the order impugned herein. 2 Perusal of the impugned order shows that Court below has taken note of all the pleas raised before it. It had even heard the voice and the talks exchanged between the parties and therein, it nowhere came that if the land is given to the prosecutrix, then she will withdraw the case. Looking to the aforesaid, contents of the application were not found to be substantiated in the recorded voice, thus the Court below has taken view that the application moved by the petitioner is nothing but to delay the proceedings. On going through the record, I find that learned Court below has taken a correct view in the facts and circumstances of the case. In view of the aforesaid, I do not find any merit in the petition, hence the same is dismissed. (M.N. BHANDARI),J. Preety Item NO.7