CR No.4465 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.4465 of 2011 Date of Decision: 8.08.2011 Mohan Singh ..... Petitioner Versus Bawa Singh and others ..... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. R.M. Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Bajaj, Advocate, for the respondents. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J.(Oral) The present revision petition has been filed to assail the impugned order dated 08.01.2011 (Annexure P-2) whereby the suit preferred by the petitioner/plaintiff was dismissed qua respondent No.1 for not impleading his legal representatives on record. After hearing counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that impugned order (Annexure P-2) cannot sustain as Court below has not noticed the amendment made in Order 22 Rule 2 by this Court. Order 22 Rule 2(A) and 2(B) reads as under:- “2-A. Every advocate appearing in a case who becomes aware of the death of a party to the litigation (whether he appeared for him or not) must give intimation about the death of that party to the Court and to the person who is dominus litis. 2-B. The duty to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased-defendant shall be of the heirs of the deceased and not CR No.4465 of 2011 -2- of the person who is dominus litis.” Therefore, the impugned order is set aside. The trial Court is directed to proceed further keeping provisions of amended rules into consideration. The present revision is accepted. (KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA) 8.08.2011 JUDGE manju