1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION S. NO.275/2011 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.47/1991 Govind Lakshmanrao Baitule and another ...Versus... Bharatiya Vaidyak Samanvaya Samiti, Nagpur through its Secretary Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. [S/Shri K.B. & N.K. Ambilwade, Advs. for applicants/appellants] CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 06.04.2011. Vide certificate dated 28.1.2011 by the office there is a report that the respondent is served on merits. None appears for the respondent sole. Learned Counsel for the appellants states that the appellants want to file proceeding by taking recourse to Section 111 (g) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The appellants are landlords and want to exercise the option of filing a suit taking recourse to Section 111 (g) of the Transfer of Property Act after giving notice under the said Act. 2 There is no legal hurdle in not allowing the appellants to do so. Hence, civil application is allowed in terms of its prayer. Second Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn. The same is disposed of as withdrawn. Civil Application stands disposed of. JUDGE ssw