IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 25TH MAY 2009 / 4TH JYAISHTA 1931 RP.No. 402 of 2009(H) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.6116/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- GANAPATHY POTTI, S/O.LATE SANKARAN POTTI AGED 46 YEARS, GOKULAM, OYYOOR P.O., VELINELLOOR, KOLLAM DIST NOW WORKING AS SANTHI AT NILACKAL DEVASWOM, SABARIMALA GROUP. BY ADV. SRI.P.R.VENKETESH SRI.R.AZAD BABU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, NANADANCODE,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, TRAVNACORE DEVASWOM BOARD, NANADANCODE,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. KESAVAN NAMBOOTHIRIR, SANTI, SASTHAMKONAM DEVASWOM, PUNALUR P.O., PUNALUR. 4. T.LAL PRASAD, SANTHI, MANKOMBU DEVASWOM, MANKOMBU P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 5. RAMESH KUMAR, KEEZH SANTHI, SREE RAMA SWAMY TEMPLE, VELINELLOOR, OYOOR P.O., 691 510. ADV.SRI.P.GOPAL, SC, TDB THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ R.P.No.402/2009 in W.P.(C). No.6116/2009-H ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 25th day of May, 2009 O R D E R The petitioner, is working as santhi at the Nilackal Devaswom. This Court, as per the judgment sought to be reviewed, has directed the second respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner in accordance with the guidelines and along with the claims of any other Santhis during the General Transfer 2009-2010. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that a new post of santi has been created at P.D. Arackal Devaswom and going by the station seniority, the review petitioner is entitled to get a posting there. 3. The learned Standing Counsel for the Devaswom Board submits that it is doubtful whether the order sanctioning the post of melsanti has been implemented in Arackal Devaswom Board. 4. Whatever that be, when this Court has directed the second respondent to consider the claims of the petitioner along with the claims of various other persons, it may not be proper for this Court to consider the R.P.402/2009 -:2:- petitioner's case in a particular manner as claimed by the petitioner. It is made clear that the Devaswom Commissioner will have to go by the guidelines while considering the rival claims of various parties. The review petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms