IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-10824 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 9, 2010 Dhanno @ Dhanpati .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Niranjan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of direction to the respondents to find out the son of the petitioner. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner will be satisfied if respondent no.2, i.e., Director General of Police, Haryana, Panchkula, is directed to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application/representation dated 19.3.2010, Annexure P7, already made to him by the petitioner. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioner, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2, i.e.,Director General of police, Haryana, Panchkula, to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application/representation, dated 19.3.2010, Annexure P7, already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioner. 9.4.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge