IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45454 of 2008 AJIT SINGH @ RAHUL … … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … … Opp. Party For the petitioner: None For the State: Shri Dashrath Mehta,APP ----------- 2. 12.12.2008 None appears on behalf of the petitioner. I have heard Shri Dashrath Mehta, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The case is under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code and the allegation is that the police learnt that 6- 7 criminals had assembled after having made preparation of committing dacoity. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor contended that the facts may not attract the provisions of Sections 399 and 402 of the Penal Code. Let the petitioner Ajit Singh alias Rahul, under the above circumstance, be released on his furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, Patna, in Rupaspur P.S.Case No.34 of 2008. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)