IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.11940 of 2011 Chandan Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 7 13-09-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the state assisted by learned counsel for the informant. There is specific allegation against this petitioner that he opened fire on the informant causing fire-arm injury to him. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that as a matter of fact, in the year, 1991, uncle of the petitioner was murdered by the uncle of informant of the present case for which, a case was instituted and to prevent the petitioner and his associates to depose in the aforesaid case, the informant has lodged this false case at the behest of his uncle. It is also pointed out by him that Paragraph-59 of the case diary reveals that the informant carries criminal antecedent of several cases. On the otherhand, learned counsel appearing for the informant vehemently opposed the prayer for bail pointing out that the informant has received grievous injury on his back said to be caused by fire-arms. It is also pointed out by him that the petitioner is main assailant and the alleged occurrence took place in the premises of Civil Court. 2 Taking into consideration the submission of the parties as well as the allegation levelled against the petitioner, I do not feel it proper to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Naugachia P.S. Case No. 132 of 2010 is, hereby, rejected. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)