@ HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT EILASF’UR (Hen. Mr. Justige Pritinke} Dawaker) W.P($). No. $4§4 of 2011 Petitioner Smt Shahnaaz Sharif VERSUS Regpondents Present: Smt Fcuzia Mirza, ceunsel fol‘ the petitioner. State of Chhattisgarh and anether Shri PDas, Dy. GA for the Statefrespondent No.1. Shri H.B. Agrawai, Sr. Advocate with Shi‘i 8atish Gupta, counsel for re'spondent No.2. ORDER (03.11.2011) Smt Mirza, on instrucitions submits that the petitioner doee nut want to contest this petition on merits at this stage and prays for withdrawal of the same with iiberty to make representation before respondent No.2 in the light of circulars dated 21 .06.2007 (Annexure P—3) and 5.01.2011 (Annexure P—4). She further submits that in identical matter i.e. W.P(S). No.17?9 of 2011; direction was issued for deciding the representation and ultimately, an order was passed by respondent No.2 on 04.05 2011 (Annexure Pv6) 2E Learned counsel for respondent No 2 has no objection if t pen les any such representation and the same is ded n accordance With law. ecid i 3 ln View of the foregoing, the petition is dismissed as hdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. ln the eventuality of filing of ay uch resentation before respondent No , it is expected tt the same would be demoted as expeditrousiy as possible in accoance with law. rd 4 It made clear that this Court has not expressed any non on the merits of the case and the authoritv concerned wod be at berty to decide the representation strictly in cordane with law. ‘ acc Sd/- Ii Pritinker Diwaker Judge he titioer fi . wit n s rep ha ; is opii ui li