IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28503 of 2010 KARU CHAUDHARY @ BARHANIA CHAUDHARY, son of late Munshi Chaudhary, resident of village Bhadeja, P.S. Mofassil, District Gaya Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 23.2.2011 Having heard counsel for the parties and taking into account the report of the trial court this Court is of the considered opinion that the end of the trial is nowhere in sight though he is in custody for a period of almost two years (28.4.2009). Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner, has also drawn attention of this Court towards paragraph 12 which reads as follows: “12. That apart from the present case petitioner is accused in Bodh Gaya P.S.Case No. 2/05 registered under sections 395 of I.P.C. and in this case petitioner is enlarged on bail by learned Sessions Judge itself. Petitioner is also accused in Gaya (M) P.S.Case No. 19/09 and he was remanded in the present case from this case, registered under section 302/34 of I.P.C. but in this case petitioner is acquitted by the learned trial court. Apart from the aforesaid two case and the present case he has no criminal 2 case pending against him,” In view of the aforementioned submission, this Court would direct the court below to verify the criminal antecedent as explained above and if it is found that the aforementioned statement of the petitioner is correct, he (Karu Chaudhary @ Barhania Chaudhary) would be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Paraiya P.S.Case No. 8/09, subject to the following conditions: (i) The two bail bonds will be furnished, one by the Government servant and the other by a close family relative. (ii) The petitioner will remain present in course of trial on each and every day and his absence even for a single day would automatically entail the consequences of cancellation of his bail. (iii) The petitioner in case is now made accused in any other criminal case, that would itself lead to cancellation of his bail. 3 Subject to the aforementioned conditions, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/