1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.5280 OF 2010. (ASHFAQUE MOHAMMAD HANIF QUIRESHI..VS. THE ADDL. COMMISSIONER, AMRAVATI & OTH.). Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : OCTOBER 27, 2010. Heard Mr. Mirza with Mr. Deshpande, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Thakare, learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondents No.1 and 2. Contention is, order dated 21.08.2007 is passed by the Additional Collector in exercise of review jurisdiction. In appeal preferred against it by the petitioner the Additional Commissioner has not looked into this jurisdictional error. It is argued that the Additional Collector has no powers of review. The learned Assistant Government Pleader has pointed out that the proceedings before the Additional Collector were under Section 258 and a revision. Perusal of the records reveal that the revision was filed before the Additional Collector against the orders of the Sub-Divisional Officer by present respondent No.3 and 2 others. Those respondents were not parties to the proceedings before the Sub-Divisional Officer. That revision was allowed and after noticing procedural irregularities in allotment of land to the petitioner, the matter was remanded back to the Sub-Divisional Officer for taking fresh decision. In appeal, the Additional Collector has maintained that order. There is no jurisdictional error or perversity. Hence, the petition is dismissed. No costs. JUDGE RR..