^i *^ ^ !H ^»» ••••'• ^^sg^--- da^--" B cr '^-•7T7 1. 2. 3. BEFORE THE HON'Bl-E HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P fC)No.^2-/Q7 Ramnarayan Vyas aged about 37 years S/o. Shri H.N.Vyas 24, Vivekanand Nagar, Raipur Ajay Sharma aged about 42 years S/o. Late Shri Fatte lal Sharma 44, Vivekanand Nagar, Raipur Ashok Purohit :' aged about 46 years .1 S/o. Late Shri Daulal Purohit ^ i47, Vivekanand Nagar, Raipur -—PETITION^RS V/s 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Home Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. Collector, Raipur. o^. ^\-1 c>v /" (~?av;:\ 6. 7. Senior Superintendent of Police, Raipur. Deputy Registrar Corpotative Society, G.E.Road, Raipur The Middle Income Group Housing Corporative Society Ltd. Vivekanand Nagar, Raipur Regd. No. D.R/RPR - 9/1960 Through Officer-In-Charge Rajendra Daga, Ex-president, The Middle Income Group Housing Corporative Society Ltd. R/o. Vivekanand Nagar, Raipur K.C.Baradia, Ex-Vice president, The Middle Income Group Housing Corporative Society Ltd. R/o. Vivekanand Nagar, Raipur &:ri;Jain Shewtambar Terapanthi Sabha, i^j&ugh Secretary, blak Bhawan, Sadar Bazar, Raipur ——RESPQNDENTS f 2 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF THE WRIT OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI OR DIRECTION OF LIKE NATURB. The petitioner named above most humbly submits as under : % HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BU-ASPUR SINGLEBENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AeyAiOTBi.J, Petftioners Resoondents WRIT PETITION <C.) N0.282 OF 2007 versus Ramnarayan Vyas and others State of Chhatlisgarh and others present : Mr. N.K.Vyas, counset for the petitioners. Mr. A.S.Kachhawaha, Government Advocate for the Siate/respondents No.1 to 4. None appears for other respondents. ORDER <th (Passed on 20'" Day of February, 2007) Leamed counsei appearing for the peUtioners submits that vide order dated 29-1-2007 (P-6) passed by the Additional Coliector (Revenue), Raipur in Case No.29W20(3)2006-07 (Ramnarayan Vyas and others vs. The Middle Income Group Housing Society Limfted, Wvekanand Nagar, Raipur), status quo was to be maintained. Despite the said order, it is not being compiied with and the construcBons are being raised illegaily. 2. it is the responsibiiity of the Additional Collector to ensure that his order is comptied with. !n view of the above, the petitionere are at liberty to approach the concerned authority fbr appropriate relief. 2 @> 3. In the event, an application is made, the Additional Collector is directed to examine the matter and ensure corapliance of his own order dated 29-1-2007 (P-6) immediately. 4. !n view of that, the writ petition stends dlsposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge GopE^