^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR 1; -..y M.A.No.1254/2004 APPELLANT RESPONDENT Rasmani Mishra, aged about 30 years, son of Shri Ramnandan Mishra, resident of Ekta Nagar, Gudhiyari, Tah and Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Vs. Ram Pratap Singh,son of Late Shri Jainarayan Singh, resident of Ashok Nagar,Gudhiyari, Raipur, Tah and Distt. Raipur (C.G.) ^ APPEAL UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1 (r) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Appearance: Shri Dilman Rafi Minj, Counsel for the appeiiant. Shri Raja, Sharma, Counsel for the respondent. ORALORDER (07.07.2009) SUNILKUMARSINHA.J. 'Heard. Learned counsel for theappeitant submits that the suit itself has been decided by the trial Court; therefore, the miscellaneous appeal filed under Order 43 Ruie 1(r) ofthe Code of Civil Procedure has now become infructuous. He prays for dismissai of t.he appeal. Accordingly,M.A.No.1254/2004 is dismissed, having become infructuous. I Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge