IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10221 of 2006 Indu Bharti, wife of Braj Kishore Chaudhary, Resident of Mohalla – 3, , L.F. / 445, Bahadurpur Housing Colony, Patna – 26 ….. Petitioner Versus 1. Bihar State Housing Board, through its Managing Director. 2. Executive Engineer, Bihar State Housing Board, Division – 2, Patna …… Respondents ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Rajni Ranjan Pd. Singh, Advocate For the Respondents: Mrs. Nilu Agarwal, Advocate ----- 4 29.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Bihar State Housing Board. It is jointly submitted at the Bar that the main dispute is with regard to the pricing of the concerned flat, which has been allotted to the petitioner. According to the petitioner she has paid the entire amount in instalments within time. However, the Housing Board has informed vide Annexure 1 that Rs. 1,26,979/- still remain is to be paid by her. Subsequently by filing supplementary counter affidavit, it is claimed by the Housing Board vide Annexure B that the total amount to be paid by her comes to the tune of Rs. 1,63,371/-. Thus, admittedly the dispute 2 is with regard to pricing of the concerned flats. It is submitted on behalf of the Housing Board that a Price Fixation Committee has been constituted for redressal of such dispute of the concerned persons and the petitioner may also approach that Committee for redressal of her grievance. Learned counsel for the petitioner also accepts the proposition. In above view of the matter, this writ application is being disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to make a proper petition / representation before the Price Fixation Committee raising her dispute within six weeks. In case such representation / petition is filed along with a copy of this order within six weeks, the same should be considered and decided by the aforesaid Price Fixation Committee within eight weeks thereafter. Spd/- ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)