IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1531 OF 2004 Shri H. B. Navgharkar .. Applicant Vs. M/s. Mahindra Ugine Steel Co. & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. Chandrakant S. Joshi for Applicant. Shri U.V. Nikam, APP for State. CORAM: S.K. SHAH, J. DATE : 18th April, 2006. P.C. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner. What is challenged by this petition is the order passed by the learned Ad Hoc Sessions Judge, Alibag, Raigad, whereby he allowed the Revision Application and quashed the order of issue of process. 2. I have perused the complaint. The complaint only makes allegations to the effect that the complainant was not allowed to go to his quarters and that the electricity and water supply was disconnected. However there is no allegation as to who has done this act. There is no disclosure of the name of the person who has committed the offence . Therefore I do not find any illegality committed by the Ad Hoc Sessions Judge in allowing the Revision and quashing the order of issue of process. I do not find any merit in the petition. The petition is dismissed. ------ (S. K. SHAH, J)