1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 55 OF 2009 Mohd. Shahid Ramzan Khan. .. Petitioner Vs State of Maharshtra & Ors. .. Respondents -- Shri A.C.Singh i/by Shri D.R. Shah for the Petitioner. Shri S.S. Joshi, AGP for Respondent No.1. Shri G.D. Utangale i/by Utangale & Co. for Respondent No.3. Ms Sarita Donde for Respondent No.4. -- CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J DATED : 8TH JUNE, 2009. P.C. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. The stand taken by the learned counsel appearing for the SRA is that the Additional Collector has to verify as to the correctness of the Annexure-II and particularly in view of the conflict shown by the two different copies of the said document. 2. The Petitioner has placed on record a copy of the Annexure-II at page 45 of the paper book showing the name of the Petitioner at Sr.No.15 of the said document. However, the Petitioner relies upon a letter issued by the Additional Collector (Enc/Removal) Mumbai Suburban District (Western) Suburb), dated 30th August, 2008, Annexure–2 to the additional affidavit 2 filed by him. Learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.4 has filed another copy of the Annexure-II at page-63 dated 28th December, 2004 showing some other name appearing at Sr.No. 15 and not that of the Petitioner and even the premises are shown as residential. 3. In view of this disputed fact, we direct the Additional Collector to verify correctness of the document (Annexure-II) as well as name of the Petitioner appearing at Sr.No.15 in the said document within a period of four weeks from today. 4. With the above directions, the Petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. The order so passed be communicated to the concerned Additional Collector immediately. CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J