IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 29TH JUNE 2010 / 8TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 20233 of 2010(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M.A.SAYEDKUTTY, S/O.ABDUL RAHIMAN, AGED 52, KARITHALA PARAMBU, C.P.UMMER ROAD, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON MANAYANI SRI.BENHUR JOSEPH MANAYANI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. K.A.SAYED MUHAMMED, CONTRACTOR, COCHIN CORPORATION, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE CORPORATION ENGINEER, COCHIN CORPORATION, ERNAKULAM. 3. COCHIN CORPORATION, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, CORPORATION COMPLEX, ERNAKULAM. 4. COCHIN CORPORATION COUNCIL, REP.BY ITS MAYOR, CORPORATION COMPLEX, ERNAKULAM. 5. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY IT'S SECRETARY TO LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. SHRI S.RAMESH BABU, SC GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT.K.R.DEEPA FOR R1 AND R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.20233/2010-D ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 29th day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner was working as a Pump Operator, operating the 'petty and para', under the first respondent, located nearby the K.S.R.T.C bus stand. The same was taken possession of by the second respondent on 18/12/2009. The first respondent is a Contractor engaged by the Corporation for operating the petty and para system. The petitioner claims arrears of wages for the period he worked. Even though he had been filing representations, nothing materialised. The petitioner now understands that the petty and para system is being revived by the Corporation. The petitioner also learns that the arrears in respect of the contract amount, towards the first respondent, is being disbursed by the Corporation. It is in these circumstances, the petitioner has filed Ext.P5 representation seeking for appropriate orders to disburse the salary of the petitioner also. There will be a direction to the third and fourth respondents to consider Ext.P5 with notice to the petitioner and the first respondent and communicate the decision to the petitioner within two months. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms \\TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE