IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1198 of 1990 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- PATEL GANDU BHADABHAI Versus JAYANTILAL BACHUBHAI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: NOTICE NOT RECD BACK for Petitioner No. 1 NOTICE UNSERVED for Petitioner No. 1 MR DM THAKKAR for Respondent No. 1 NOTICE NOT RECD BACK for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Date of decision: 13/02/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT Notice was issued to the petitioner at his registered address since his advocate had been appointed as District Judge. It came back unserved with the report that the address was incomplete. Subsequently, notice was also sent to his advocate in the lower courts and it has been served. However, the petitioner has not entered fresh appearance. In the circumstances, the revision application is dismissed. Rule discharged with no order as to costs. ####### hki