1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3699 OF 2009 Maniben Manilal Shah ...Petitioner Versus The Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. A.V. Anturkar i/by Mr. S.B. Deshmukh for the Petitioner Mr. A.N. Samant for the Respondents. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE: JUNE 17, 2009 P.C.:- The petitioner was a licensee. The licence expired in year 2000. The Central Railway had, however, demolished the premises of the petitioner as well as others. The demolition took place for widening and re-modeling the railway station. This all happened in year 2000. The petitioner is approaching this Court almost after a decade, seeking a direction that she should be given an alternative accommodation. 2 2. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that the Writ Petition was filed on behalf of many of the displaced occupants, which was dismissed. Even that Writ Petition, on which reliance is placed by the petitioner, has been dismissed as early as on 19th October, 2001, being Writ Petition No. 2523 of 2001. In that Writ Petition, the Court had merely stated that the Railway should consider the application of the petitioners in that petition for rehabilitation in accordance with the Scheme sympathetically. We do not think that even such relief can be granted to the petitioner at this point of time. 3. The Writ Petition is dismissed. BILAL NAZKI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.