1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. SECOND APPEAL NO.59 OF 2002 AND SECOND APPEAL NO.60 OF 2002. MAJHENDRAKUMAR WAMANSA AHALE VS. SMT. SAVITRIBAI WD/O CHAMPATRAO CHIRDE & OTHES. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Mr. B. G. Kulkarni, Advocate for the appellant in SA/59/2002. Mr. M. N. Phadke, Advocate for the appellant in SA/60/2002. Mr. D. M. Kale, Advocate for the Respondents no.1 to 13. Mr. C.V. Kale, Advocate for the Respondents no.1 to 13. Coram : A.H. Joshi, J. Dated : 16th July, 2009. 1. Parties have filed consent terms in Marathi along with translation. It is seen that the parties have not :- 1. signed all pages of the consent terms; 2. filed affidavit in support of consent terms. 2. Learned Advocates pray for time for compliance, and permission. 3. Parties are permitted to sign on each and every page of the consent terms or file a fresh copy making signature of every consenting party on every page. 4. Learned Advocates should attest the 2 signature and thumb impression. 5. Time is granted to file the affidavit in support of the consent terms. 6. List on 20-7-2009 if compliance is done. JUDGE /Muley/