IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-32655 of 2011 Date of Decision: August 25, 2011 Ram Parsad & another .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Raj Mohan Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Sukhvinder Singh Nara, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. prays for issuance of directions to the investigating agency of case FIR No.57 dated 20.6.2010 under Sections 148, 149, 323, 307, 506 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, Police Station Hassanpur, District Palwal, to entrust the investigation to any independent agency, preferably outside District Palwal. 2. It has been pleaded that son of the petitioner got Crl. Misc. No. M-32655 of 2010 [2] the FIR lodged. Two persons received fire-arm injuries. So as to suppress the true version, a cross case has been registered and the petitioners have been arrayed as accused. Out of 8 persons from the petitioners’ side, 4 have been found to be innocent. Learned counsel for the petitioners asserts that it is a fabricated incident on account of which the petitioners have been implicated. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions from Rajpal Singh, Assistant Sub Inspector, states that challan has been presented on 13.6.2011. Out of the accused named by the complainant of FIR No.57 dated 20.6.2010, as detailed above, 4 have been found to be involved in commission of offence. Against 2 of them, challan has been presented and 2 are absconding. 4. In view of the stage of the case, learned counsel for the petitioners contends that petitioners would like to avail remedy under Section 173(8) Cr.P.C. and/ or filing of criminal complaint or protest petition. 5. Dismissed as withdrawn. 6. This Court trusts that the Magistrate dealing with the issue would take into account the extent of injuries received by the petitioners and other circumventing circumstances. (AJAI LAMBA) August 25, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? Crl. Misc. No. M-32655 of 2010 [3] 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?