IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.34997 -M of 2010 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : JULY 14, 2011 JAGMOHAN SINGH ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Ranjit Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Addl.AG, Punjab. Mr. SS Deol, Advocate, for respondents 6 to 12. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 This petition has been filed under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, praying for issuance of directions to the official respondents to consider the plea of the petitioner- complainant to the effect that manifest injustice has been caused because of repeated inquiries and different conclusions drawn by the Investigating Agency, in regard to investigation of FIR No.63 dated 6.6.2010 under Sections 324, 323, 452, 148, 149, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Sadar Tarn Taran. 2 It has been brought out that final report under Section 173, Code of Criminal Procedure, has been presented in court on 10.11.2010. Some of the persons mentioned in the FIR have been nominated as accused. Some other persons have also been Criminal Misc. No.34997 -M of 2010 (O&M) 2 named as accused. Some persons named in the FIR have been found to be innocent. It has been brought out that even charges have been framed. 3 The petitioner has an alternate remedy available by way of filing application under Section 319, Code of Criminal Procedure, before the trial court, after bringing evidence, so as to summon the persons as additional accused. 4 No ground for interference at this stage of proceedings under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, is made out. 5 The petition is, accordingly, disposed of. July 14, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?