IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 812 of 2009 Between: Bora Mallaiah S/o. Late Lingaiah Maripeda Seetharampuram Shop No.II Maripeda Village and Mandal, Warangal District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Joint Collector (CS) Warangal, Warangal District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mahaboobabad, Warangal District. 3 The Tahsildar, Maripeda Mandal, Warangal District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not granting interim direction in the appeal filed by petitioner challenging the order passed by the 2nd respondent in Procs. Rc No. C/1157/2008 dt. 26-11-2008 suspending the petitioner’s authorization of Maripeda Seetharampuram Shop No. II, Maripeda Village, and Mandal, Warangal District, as illegal, and arbitrary and consequently set aside the order passed by the 2nd respondent in Procs. Rc No. C/1157/2008 dt. 26-11-2008. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.PALLENAGESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU Writ Petition No.812 of 2009 Order: This writ petition is filed seeking a Mandamus declaring the action of the first respondent in not granting interim orders in the appeal purported to have been filed by the petitioner challenging the order in Procs.Rc.No.C/1157/2008, dated 26.11.2008, passed by the second respondent suspending the authorization of the petitioner for Fair Price Shop No.II, Maripeda Village and Mandal, Warangal District, as arbitrary and illegal. It appears, the petitioner was the Fair Price Shop Dealer of Shop No.II of Maripeda Village and Mandal, Warangal District. While that being so, his authorisation was suspended by an order, dated 26.11.2008, by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Mahaboobabad, Warangal District, the second respondent herein. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner has already preferred an appeal before the Joint Collector (CS), Warangal, the first respondent herein, along with a stay petition. It is his grievance that neither the stay petition is disposed of nor the appeal is taken up for hearing. Hence, this writ petition. In the facts and circumstances of the case and as the statutory appeal is pending, without going into the merits, the writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to dispose of the stay petition filed by the petitioner along with the appeal filed against the order, dated 26.11.2008, passed by the second respondent within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioner. No costs. _________________ C.V.Ramulu, J. Date: 30.01.2009 Note: Issue CC in two days. (b/o) VGB