IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 16TH JUNE 2011 / 26TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 16149 of 2011(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- T.N.SESHADRI NARAYANAN,S/O.T.R.NATARAJAN MARIPADAM KALAM, PALLASSANA, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678505. BY ADV. SRI.H.BADARUDDIN SMT.B.SHAMEERA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, PALLASSANA, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678505. 2. THE THARAPADAM-KARIKKAMULI PADASEKHARA SAMITHI, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY PALLASSANA, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. PIN-678505. SR GP SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 16149 of 2011 EXHIBITS EXT.P1- TRUE COPY OF THE PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR SUBSIDY TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 22.7.09 EXT.P2- TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE IN RESPECT OF THE AGRICULTURAL LAND CULTIVATED BY THE PETITIONER SITUATED IN SURVEY NO.313/2, 313/10 (R.S.150/3) EXT.P3- TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 19.7.10 VIDE RECEIPT 5941453 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PALLASSANA (TRUE COPY) P.A TO JUDGE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).16149/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 16th day of June, 2011 JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance projected in the writ petition has already been brought up for consideration by filing Ext.P1 before the first respondent and that, the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is given to the said respondent to have it finalised in accordance with law, within a reasonable time. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 3. In view of the limited nature of the relief sought for, this Court does not find it necessary to issue notice to the second respondent for the time being. 4. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of directing the first respondent to consider Ext.P1 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and also to the second respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks W.P.(C).16149/11 2 from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with the copy of the writ petition. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, Judge mrcs