y (1) € ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.1 Sl'ntllfi^ SECONDAPPEAL N0. /2008 APPELLANT/ ./ DefendantNo.l 'Keju Ram Satnami, S/o Shri Chanchu Satnami, Aged about 60 years, R/o Village Telinsatti, Tahsil & District-Dhamtari (C.G.) '^\^\y' RESPONDENTS/ Plaintiffs VERSUS — — :^ ^Baisakhin Bai, S/o Shri Bhanjan ^ rtnami, Aged about 65 years, R/o Village Nawagaon, (Thuha) ^ Tahsil-Kurud, (C.G.) District-Dhamtari ^.^ .<^' ^' ^^^ ^ ^^ 2. y^Panchbai, W/o Malikram Satnami, 1 Aged about 50 years, R/o Village -.r- ..'A' '^' .^'. u-t'-t> Chhati, Tahsil & District-Dhamtari (C.G.) ^' /f Savitri Bai, W/o Derha Prasad, \ge6 about 45 years, R/o Village Chhati, Tahsil & District-Dhamtari (C.G.) State.of Chhattisgarh ,/" Through : Collector, Dhamtari, District-Dha^mtari (C.G.) SECOND APPEAL UNDER^IOO OF THE CIVIL PROCfDURE^CODE 4. e^ (1) ^. Saaiia Ram Satafi.aniAc • S/e &ate Sejaraa sataamiy aged akou-t 32 year<<; 9/o •»Altage-Tel*»«attA, seahs&l & OistrtctaDhamtari .®.} ~sv( .<iiqi<nq, ®-al<i<i6,f^diyy,'1. s.^~^&.^3 ^8 aff^I ^il !<-il* WT •3?T^T shHlsh Wniniii \ Gopal 3TI^?I '7^7 ('ylA'5*'^) TOIIWHfef 311^1 LOK-AdlALAT 6-10-2010 Shri Kunal Das, counsel for Shri J.A.Lohani, counsel for Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Deput^ State/respondent No.4. *i<iiy]'ft-f 'qTOff ~s fs«st<r->i^i< '^siRnan^T the appellant. respondents No.1 to 3. Government Advocate for the The appellant as well as ^espondents No.1 to 3 are also present in the Lok-Adalat. An application under Ordeij 23 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (henceforth 'the pode') for recording compromise has been filed along with affidavits of the appellant and respondents No.1 to 3. The cont^nts of the affidavits were verified and the parties have adhered affidavits. An agreement to sell ^ been annexed with the applicatici dated 27-7-2010 executed by the| ofthe decree passed in this secorjd appeal. Accordingly, the applicatio^i under Order 23 Rule 3 of the Code is allowed. A decree be dr^wn up in terms of the agreement dated 27-7-2010. The appellarjt shall be entitled to refund of Court-fees paid. The second appeal is compromise. Sd/- Vtentoer LotiAddMHighCourt Biaspur(C.Q.) o the statements made in the s a part of compromise has also n. The terms of the agreement parties shall be treated as terms fJisposed of in terms of the Sd/ Member-LokAdalat Migh Court <rf ChhatBsflsurh BILASPUR