[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION W.P.NO.356 OF 1993 Dr.(Mrs.) Preeti R.Mehta and Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. The Bombay Municipal Corporation & Ors. ..Respondents ... None for Petitioners Mr.A.Y.Sakhare Senior Counsel with Ms.T.Puranik for Respondent No.1 Mr.P.P.Chavan for Respondent No.3 ... CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : JUNE 6, 2006 DATE : JUNE 6, 2006 DATE : JUNE 6, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. On instructions, the learned counsel for Respondent No.3 points out that Respondent No.3 is no longer in service as he had left the service and challenge in this petition was to the selection of Respondent No.3. As Respondent No.3 is no longer in service, nothing survives in this petition. Rule discharged. No order as to costs. [ F.I.REBELLO, J.] [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]