IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 18TH MARCH 2008 / 28TH PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 9241 of 2008(A) ------------------------- AS.25/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE SUBORDINATE JUDGE'S COURT, KASARAGOD PETITIONER: ------------ S.SHANMUGHAN ,AGED 41 YEARS, S/O. SUBRAHMANYAN ACHARI,RESIDING AT THOTTIYIL HOUSE, KALANAD VILLAGE, KASARGOD TALUK, KASARGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.MADHU RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. DAMODARAN THANTHRI,AGED 52 YEARS, FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN RESIDING AT ARAVATH ILLOM, P.O.PANAYAL, PANAYAL VILLAGE, KASARGOD TALUK, KASARGOD DISTRICT. 2. RAJAGOPALAN.P.,AGED 50 YEARS S/O. LATE PALANI ACHARI,GOLDSMITH,RESIDING AT LAKSHMI NILAYAM, PUTHUKAI, PUTHUKAI P.O. NILESHWAR VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARGOD DISTRICT. 3. GANESHAN K.,AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.LATE SUBRAHMANYAN AHCARI, PUSHPALATHA JEWELLERY, RESIDING AT UDMA, P.O. UDMA UDMA VILLAGE, KASARGOD DISTRICT. 4. CHANDRAN B,,AGED 47 YEARS, S/O.LATE KRISHNAN ACHARI, MANGALA JEWELLERY RESIDING AT IDAVUNGAL, MELPARAMBA P.O., KALANAD, KALANAD VILLAGE, KASARGOD TALUK KASARGOD DISTRICT. 5. K.S. SUBHAYYA ACHARI, AGED 67 YEARS S/O.LATE APPU ACHARI, GOLDSMITH,RESIDING NEAR FLOWER MARKET ROAD, CAR STREET, MANAGALORE, KARNATAKA STATE. 6. K.DAMODARAN, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS S/O.LATE PERUMAL ACHARI, RESIDING NEAR KALIKADEVI TEMPLE, P.O. KALANAD, KALANAD VILLAGE KASARGOD TALUK, KASARGOD DISTRICT. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M. N. Krishnan, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 9241 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 18th day of March, 2008 JUDGMENT This writ petition is filed for a direction to the Subordinate Judge, Kasaragod to consider Ext.P3 application and pass orders as expeditiously as possible preferably on or before 19-3-2008. The writ petition is filed only on 17-3-2008 and it came up for admission today and there is only one day left before the punaprathishta to be done i.e., 21-3-2008. The petitioner has waited till the last moment to come up before this Court. Punaprathishta in a temple is a ceremony, which has to be preceded with so many other poojas. The poojas have already started. To stall it, which will result in affecting the religious feelings of the devotees of the temple. Therefore at this stage I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. M.N.Krishnan, Judge. mn.