IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN TUESDAY, THE 9TH JUNE 2009 / 19TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 13816 of 2009(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- K.J. DENNIS, PROPRIETOR, EURO MATS, KALAVOOR.P.O, ALAPPUZHA, REPRESENTED BY THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, R. ANILKUMAR, S/O. RAJAPPAN, KANNARKAD, PERUMTHURUTH MURI, KANJIKUZHI VILLAGE, CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.J.OM PRAKASH RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MARARIKULAM. 2. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, THE KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, DISTRICT OFFICE, ALAPPUZHA. 3. CHANDRAMOHANAN NAIR, MANOHARAVILASAM, MANNANCHERRY.P.O, ALAPPUZHA. 4. BABU, MANOHARAVILASAM, MANNACHERRY.P.O, ALAPPUZHA. 5. BHAGYALAKSHMI, MANOHARAVILASAM, MANNANCHERRY.P.O, ALAPPUZHA. 6. ANILKUMAR, MANOHARAVILASAM, MANNANCHERRY.P.O, ALAPPUZHA. 7. USHA RAJAGOPAL, LAKSHMY NILAYAM, MANNACHERRY.P.O, ALAPPUZHA. 8. RETHIKUMARI, RAVEENDRAN PILLAI, RESHA BHAVAN, MANNACHERRY.P.O, ALAPPUZHA. 9. REMANAN, S/O. KUMARAN, CHIMMARUVELI, MANNANCHERRY.P.O, ALAPPUZHA. 10. GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR, LAKSHMY BHAVAN, MANNACHERRY.P.O, ALAPPUZHA. 11. HARIKUMAR, LAKSHMY BHAVAN, MANNANCHERRY P.O., ALAPPUZHA. 12. CHANDRAN PILLAI, KOVILAKATU VELI, MANNANCHERRY P.O., ALAPPUZHA. 13. MANOJ, KOVILAKATHU VELI, MANNANCHERRY P.O., ALAPPUZHA. 14. SASEENDRAN, SARITHA NIVAS, MANNANCHERRY P.O., ALAPPUZHA. ADDL. R15 TO R30 IMPLEADED. 15. V. PURUSHAN, S/O. VASU, AGED 65 YEARS, THEKKEVELI, MANNANCHERRY P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 16. P.B. RAVEENDRAN, S/O. BHASKARAN, AGED 50 YERAS, NIKARTHIL, MANNANCHERRY P.O. ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 17. SUKUMARI, W/O. HARIDAS, AGED 53 YEARS, VELIYIL, MANNANCHERRY P.O. ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 18. SUMANGALA, W/O. PONNAPPAN, AGED 50 YEARS, KUTTANKALVELI, MANNANCHERRY P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 19. PURUSHAN, S/O. PAPPU, AGED 60 YEARS, THEKKEVELI, MANNANCHERRY P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 20. BHASURA, D/O. VELAYUDHAN, AGED 52 YEARS, THEKKEVELI, MANNANCHERRY P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 21. RAJAMMA, W/O. KAMALADHARAN, AGED 48 YEARS, CHIMMARUVELI, MANNANCHERRY P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 22. RETHNAMMA, W/O. DAMODARAN, AGED 52 YEARS, CHIMMARUVELI, MANNANCHERRY P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 23. BEENA, W/O. SADHIK, AGED 33 YEARS, CHIMMARUPARAMPU, MANNACHERRY P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 24. SOMAN, S/O. RAGHAVAN PILLAI, AGED 47 YERS, UDAYA NIVAS, MANNANCHERRY P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 25. DANAVAN, S/O. KESAVAN, AGED 75 YEARS, REJI NIVAS, MANNANCHERRY P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 26. PADMINI, W/O. MANIYAN PILLA, AGED 44 YEARS, SREE LAKSHMI NIVAS, MANNACHERRY P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 27. LAILA, W/O. SALIM, AGED 44 YEARS, KOVILAKATHUVELI, MANNANCHERRY P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 28. SOUJA, W/O. NOUSHAD, AGED 35 YEARS, SADAR MANZIL, MANNAHCERRY P.O., ALAPPUZA DISTRICT. 29. DEEPTHI, W/O. REJI, AGED 28 YEARS, NJANDIRICKALVELI, MANNANCHERRY P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 30. SANTHOSH, W/O. GOPALAKRISHNA PILLAI, AGED 30 YEARS, NJANDIRICKAL VELI, MANNANCHERRY P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. ADDL.R15 TO 30 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED9.6.2009 IN I.A. 6829/2009 BY GOVT.PLEDER SRI. P.A. SALIM. ADV. SRI.B.S.SIVAJI FOR R3 TO R30 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC. 13816/2009. APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT. P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE CHIEF MANAGER, UNION BANK OF INDIA, ALAPPUZHA BRANCH DATED 21.8.2008. EXT. P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT TO ESTABLISH ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 20.11.2008. EXT. P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF THE SECRETARY (SPECIAL GRADE) MANNANCHERRY GRAMA PANCHAYAT DATED 13.5.2009. EXT. P4 : A TRUE COPY OF THE LICENCE ISSUED BY THE DIRECTOR OF FACTORIES AND BOILERS DATED 6.5.2009. EXT. P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 14.5.2009. P.R. RAMAN & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 13816 of 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 9th day of June, 2009. JUDGMENT Raman, J, Heard. There will be a direction to the first respondent to give protection for putting up the Chimney in the proposed factory of the petitioner, if he is possessed of all necessary licences for the same. But the actual running of the factory will be done only after obtaining the necessary licences from the authorities concerned. If the party respondent has got any grievance in the factory being set up on any valid ground, this order will not stand in the way of him approaching the statutory authorities or the civil court as the case may be. The writ petition is disposed of as above. P.R. Raman, Judge P. Bhavadasan, Judge sb.