1 25.appa.1528-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1528 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1089 OF 2006 Pravin Yamunaji Nichit. ..Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Another. ..Respondents. .......... None for the Applicant. Mr.K.V. Saste, A.P.P. for the State. .......... CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 17TH JANUARY, 2011. P.C. 1. This is second bail application preferred by the accused. First bail application was rejected on merits. In the present Application, however, it is asserted that the Applicant has already undergone substantial sentence period and for which reason, he should be enlarged on bail as there is no likelihood of Appeal maturing for hearing in the near future. 2. Learned A.P.P., on instructions, states that the Applicant has just undergone 4 years 6 months & 3 days of sentence period. Learned A.P.P. further submitted that moreover when the Applicant was released on parole he did not surrender in jail within the given time and instead PPD 2 25.appa.1528-10 overstayed the parole by 3 years & 2 months and that he was required to be arrested. Besides, while he was overstaying the parole period he committed another offence bearing C.R. No.268/2009 punishable under Section 395 of Indian Penal Code. 3. All these aspects are not disclosed in the Application filed before us. For all these reasons, this application fails and the same is rejected. (A. R. JOSHI, J.) (A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.)