IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 18890 of 2006 Between: Smt. Mallipamula Indira, W/o. M. Satyanarayana, R/o. D.No. 34-1-12, By Pass Road, Sydulapeta, Mandapeta, Mandapeta Mandal, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND The Karuru Vysya Bank Limited, Rep by its Authorised Officer and Branch Manager, Mandapeta Branch, Mandapeta, Mandapeta Mandal, East Godavari District. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent in issuing the notice dated 1-9-2006, under the provisions of Sub.Sec. 4(a)(b)(c)(d) of Sec. 13 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act 2002 intimating the petitioner that it has been decided to take possession of the secured i.e. Residential house of the petitioner bearing D.No. 34-1-12 situated at By Pass Road, Sydulapeta, Mandapeta, Mandapeta Mandal, East Godavari District on 12-9-2006 at 1.00 A.M. for the purpose of selling the same and to adjust the sale proceeds towards petitioner's loan account with them, in a highly unlawful, arbitrary manner, by superseding the powers vested with the Hon'ble Debt Recovery Tribunal and also violating the provisions of Article 300-A of the constitution of India, as the same is highly illegal, ultra vires, arbitrary, unreasonable, against to the principles of natural justice, consequently declare the action of the Respondent in trying to take possession of the secured assets forcibly as null and void and pass such order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem ﬁt and proper in the circumstances of the case Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.MURALI KRISHNA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.K.V.SUBRAHMANYA NARUSU The Court made the following : 0 R D E R: No representation for the petitioners. It indicates that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing this writ petition. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. 26th September, 2008. (B.Seshasayana Reddy,J) tnb ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{BMR} THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.18890 OF 2006 26T H SEPTEMBER, 2008