IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 915 of 2010 Date of decision: 13.01.2010 Inderjit Singh Walia and another ........ petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Malkeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) It is stated that the supplementary challan against the petitioners was presented on 04.12.2001 and the charges were framed against the petitioners vide order dated 04.04.2006. It is also stated that the co-accused of the petitioners has already been acquitted. It is further stated that the complainant has left the country and the matter is being adjourned. In the facts of the present case, it would be sufficient to dispose of the present petition with a direction to the trial Court to conclude the trial expeditiously, preferably within four months. Disposed of accordingly. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge January 13, 2010 mohan