1 CA-2786.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2786 OF 2010 Baliram Genu Ahir & Ors. .... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent S/Shri Anil K. Lulla i/b S.B. Lambhate for the Applicant. Ms Geeta P. Mulekar, APP, for the State. Shri S.H. Joshi for the Intervener. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: SEPTEMBER 14, 2010 P.C: The applicants seek bail in an offence of murder of one Ganesh Pokharkar. The applicants have all been named in the FIR and the supplementary statement recorded on the very next date. Their roles have also been described. They are not unknown persons. There were previous quarrels and in fact the parties had come to the police out-post for settling the matter. The learned counsel for the applicants points to the impossibility of the victim having been taken to a Primary Health Centre and from there to a private hospital at 11:30 a.m.. The incident, according to the FIR, 2 CA-2786.10 occurred in between 10:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.. The distances to the Primary Health Centre and Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital would definitely make it difficult to believe that the victim had gone to those hospitals by 11:30 a.m.. Both the hospitals interestingly mention that the injured persons and the victim were examined at the same time at two places, at 11:30 a.m.. This can occur because of a variety of causes like the doctors being not particular about noting the time. This cannot be gone into at this stage. The learned counsel for the applicants also submitted that four persons could not have been examined at the same time at two places at 11:30 a.m., but this must await appreciation of evidence at the trial and cannot be taken into consideration for considering the bail application. Since the applicants have been named in the FIR itself as the assailants who inflicted wounds on the victim, who died, the application is rejected. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)