1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. REVISION APPLICATION NO. 179 OF 1992 CRI. REVISION APPLICATION NO. 179 OF 1992 CRI. REVISION APPLICATION NO. 179 OF 1992 IN S.C.NO.21/1986 IN C.R. NO.30/1984 Chandrakant Krishnaji Dhairyawan ..Petitioners. and others. V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. ----- Shri M.S. Mohite for the Petitioners. Shri D.R. More, APP for Respondent. ----- CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 17, 2005 DATED : FEBRUARY 17, 2005 DATED : FEBRUARY 17, 2005 PC :- PC :- PC :- . This revision application No. 179/1992 has been filed by the original accused Nos. 3, 4 and 5, who are the owners and Architect respectively. 2. After hearing counsel for the petitioners at length, as I indicated my mind, the counsel fairly accepts that the court may not record reasons which may affect the fair trial available to the petitioners herein. In other words, it is submitted that if any opinion is expressed by this court, one way or the other, that may prejudice the petitioners at the trial. 2 3. In the circumstances, the counsel for the petitioners prays that the petitioners be permitted to withdraw the revision application. 4. In this peculiar circumstances, the revision application is dismissed as withdraw with direction to the trial court to proceed with the trial being Special Case No. 21 of 1986, as expeditiously as possible. 5. Needless to observe that the trial will proceed on its own merits in accordance with law, uninfluenced by any observations made by the lower court in the impugned decision or withdrawal of the present revision application. 6. Ordered accordingly. .....