IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 4072 of 2003 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.1.2009 Yudhvir Jha and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri Sanjiv Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioners. Shri Rameshsar Malik, Additional AG, Haryana, with Shri Himanshu Raj, AAG, Haryana. Shri Raman Gaur, Advocate for HUDA. T.S. Thakur, C.J. (Oral). Learned counsel for the respondent-HUDA submits that pursuant to the directions of this Court issued in Civil Writ Petition No. 11637 of 1996 disposed of by order dated 26.4.1999, HUDA has formulated a Scheme for rehabilitation of those, who are dispossessed from HUDA's land, illegally occupied by them. He submits that the petitioners can also seek the benefit of the said Scheme, in which event, their claims shall be examined in terms of the Scheme. He draws our attention to a similar order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal Nos. 1153-1167 of 2001 dated 3.4.2008 and prays for disposal of this petition on similar terms. In the circumstances, therefore, and keeping in view the CWP No. 4072 of 2003 (O&M) (2) statement made on behalf of the respondent-HUDA, we dispose of this writ petition with the observation that the petitioners shall be free to seek benefit of the rehabilitation Scheme, formulated by HUDA, in which event, HUDA shall examine their claims and grant whatever benefit is otherwise permissible under the same, subject to their being eligible for such benefit. No costs. (T.S. THAKUR) CHIEF JUSTICE (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 22-01-2009 ds