THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.DURGA PRASAD CRIMINAL PETITION NO.3491 OF 2008 Between: Mohd.Basha Officer and another .. Petitioners And The State of A.P., rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and another. .. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.DURGA PRASAD CRIMINAL PETITION NO.3491 OF 2008 ORDER: This is a petition filed under Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code (for short “Cr.P.C.”) for quashing the proceedings in C.C.No.30 of 2008 on the file of the First Additional Munsif Magistrate, Tenali. The petitioners herein are A-4 and A-5 in the above said C.C.No.30 of 2008. The respondent No.2 herein has filed the complaint against the present petitioners and three others under Sections 7(i), 2(i)(m) and Section 16(1)(a)(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (for short “the PFA Act”) and alleging that on 23.06.2007 the Food Inspector G.Subba Rao along with Pallapothu Harinarayana and Allu Rama Rao inspected the shop M/s Uma Mahesh General Stores, Jandhyalavari Street, Tenali and found 32 packets Vijaya Double Filtered Groundnut Oil containing 500 ml each kept for sale for human consumption. The Food Inspector purchased 500 ml Vijaya Premium Double Filtered Groundnut Oil sealed packets three and paid Rs.105/-. In the presence of mediators and the vendor the Food Inspector had drawn three samples and one of the samples was sent to the Public Analyst, Food Laboratory and the remaining two sample packets were deposited with the Local (Health) Authority and obtained receipt. The Food Inspector has received the Public Analyst report dated 30.07.2007 alleging that the sample was adulterated, as such obtained permission from the Director of I.P.M. Public Health Labs, Food (Health) Administration, Hyderabad and launched the prosecution against the petitioners herein and three others. As per the said complaint the present petitioners are the manufacturers of the said Vijaya Premium Double Filtered Groundnut Oil, which was purchased by the Food Inspector and sent for analysis. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the samples were drawn on 23.06.2007 and the prosecution was launched on 17.12.2007 i.e. nearly after six months by which date the samples drawn by the Food Inspector were expired as the said oil purchased by the Food Inspector is best for use within six months. It is not disputed by the petitioners that the packets of Vijaya Premium Double Filtered Groundnut Oil shows that it is best for use within six months. Admittedly, the three samples were taken on 23.06.2007 at the shop M/s Uma Mahesh General Stores, Jandhyalavari Street, Tenali and the prosecution was launched on 17.12.2007. Therefore, the prosecution has launched after six months of taking the samples. Under Section 13(2) of the PFA Act, the accused is given an opportunity to ask the Court to send the second sample to the Central Food Laboratory for analysis. In the present case, as charge sheet was filed after six months of taking the samples, by which date the maximum period for best use was expired, as such the petitioners have lost their opportunity to send the second sample to the Central Food Laboratory for analysis. On account of the delay in launching the prosecution i.e. filing the complaint, the valuable right which is available under Section 13(2) of the PFA Act are lost. Hence, in the above circumstances the continuation of the above said proceedings would amount to abuse of process of law and no purpose would be served in continuing the proceedings. Therefore, the petitioners are entitled for quashing of the proceedings as prayed for. In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings against the present petitioners in C.C.No.30 of 2008 on the file of the First Additional Munsif Magistrate, Tenali are hereby quashed. __________________ P.DURGA PRASAD, J 21-04-2011 MR THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.DURGA PRASAD CRIMINAL PETITION NO.3491 OF 2008 21-04-2011 MR