IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1595 of 2006 RAVINDRA KUMAR @ ROBEN CHANDRA GHOSH Versus BIHAY KUMAR SAHA @ VINAY K. SAH ----------- 3 13.01.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner. This Court would not find any jurisdictional error in the impugned order inasmuch as when the plea of the defendant-tenant-petitioner with regard to grant of rent receipt by the plaintiff-landlord was accepted and in fact accepted as his defence for payment of the rent for certain period, failure on the part of the petitioner to produce rent receipt for the period in question would only prima-facie demonstrate that such claim of payment of rent for which no rent receipt could be produced by the petitioner was actually payable by him. That being so, this Civil Revision application is wholly misconceived and is hereby dismissed. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)