MC 1400/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Mr. Banerjee, learned Senior counsel for the applicants/appellants and Mr. Aslam, learned counsel for the opposite party Nos.1,2 & 4. The application reveals that meanwhile, the applicant No.2(a) has died leaving b ehind three sons namely, Sahabuddin (applicant No.2(b) ), Salimuddin (applicant No.2(c) ), and Jasimuddin (applicant No.2(d) ). That the application for substi tution of the deceased applicant No.2(a) by her aforenamed heirs is in time has also been stated. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on a consideration of the averments supported by an affidavit, the prayer for substitution of the applican t/appellant No.2(a) by her abovenamed three sons is allowed. As the heirs are already on record, no formal substitution is called for. The n ame of the applicant No.2(a) Mussamat Pearunnessa be struck off from the array o f parties. This miscellaneous case is allowed in the above terms.