IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No 4760 of 2010 M/s Raunak Trade & Agencies Private Limited having its office at Library Road, Ward No 4, Forbesganj, District – Araria through its Director Mangi Lal Golchha, son of late Gordhan Das Golchha, resident of Library Road, Ward No 4, Forbesganj, P S – Forbesganj, District – Araria - Petitioner Versus 1 The Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Udyog Bhawan, East Gandhi Maidan, Patna through its Managing Director 2 The Managing Director, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Udyog Bhawan, East Gandhi Maidan, Patna 3 The Executive Director, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Large Industrial Estate, Barari, District – Bhagalpur 4 The Development Officer, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Regional Office, Large Industrial Estate, Barari, District - Bhagalpur - Respondents ----------- 3 09.03.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioner had obtained an industrial plot at the Forebsganj Industrial Area by setting up Industry from the Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority (BIADA). There were certain problems including kidnapping and murder in the family of the promoter. The unit had paid the full amount for the said plot. It could not set up the Unit. It was threatened with cancellation. It came to this Court and the writ petition being CWJC No 6227 of 2010 was disposed of by order dated 04.05.2010 granting petitioner time upto October, 2010 to establish an Industry. Petitioner has filed this modification application in November, 2010 requesting further time because of various difficulties faced. It is pointed out by the petitioner that there are certain demographic changes to be made on the land, the permission of which is not being granted as the period of October, 2010 has expired. Be that as it may, Mr Lalit Kishore points out that virtually, 2 except for making a boundary wall enclosing the Industrial Area, there has been little or no progress by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that at least to the extent of construction made after the order of this Court, as stands admitted by the BIADA, there seems bona fides on part of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid, heavens would not fall if petitioner is granted at least six months’ further time from today to take effective steps for establishment of Industry. It is pointed out that establishment of Industry cannot be put in such a tight straight jacket especially when it comes to Small Scale Industry. Be that as it may, considering the different aspects, in my view, no harm will be done if petitioner is given six months’ time from today to take effective steps for establishing the Industry. For doing so, if the petitioner has already approached or approaches the Authority for necessary permission or assistance in that matter, Authority would forthwith grant permission and/or give assistance in the matter so that petitioner has no further opportunity to take time. With these observations, this application stands disposed of. M.E.H./ (Navaniti Prasad Singh)