c^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.l W.P.fS) N0. ^Z^^ 72010 w PETITIONERS oX .^^4 .<? '.•nc7..^\^ ^y . ^^ ... ^y...--"'" ^^•' ^' RESPONDENTS -ws^ /yS!^, ^ "^ ^ '^ '"'•, l'^^@^*1 & 1. 2. VERSUS 1. " 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Shant KumatTiwari, aged about 48 years, S/o- late Ramsewak Tiwari, posted as Shaikshnik Sankul Co-ordinator at Sankul Center- Sundra, Block & District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Tikam Ram Yadav aged about 52 years, S/o- late Toran Singh, posted as Shaikshnik Sankul Co-ordinator at Sankul Center Ghumka, Block & District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Collector, Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) District Project Co-ordinator, Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Principal, District Education and Training Institute, Khairagarh, District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Block- Rajnandgaon, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) District- WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ^ .1 XI-HC—78 V W^T '3FT ^Jch ^T^TT W^T^RW <^ *llltll »»Hlch TST ^i^Kn^, ^TTI^KO, [«ldl'ylj,< _......y..?:..^3.M:.5.'2:<<sk. "^l 200 3^?T TI?W (^qI^q<^T) ^cnw^rf^s'T^r SB^.HOK?BLEM&_J10STICEPRn 13.09.2010 Shri F.S.Khare^ counsel for Shri Ajit Singh, P.L. for the S Grievance of the petitioners petitioners are working as Shaiks last about nine years but their c: considered and now a fresh appointments are made on the s deprived from thei^job. Counsel for the petitioners the petitioners (Annexure P/ 1) is ]: has not been decided. He subm: served if direction is issued for petitioners. State counsel submits tha.1 representation arid the same wc concerned strictly in accordance •w: Accordingly^ the 'petition is making fresh representation by th month from tlie date of receipt of c the same would be decided within accords.nce with law. It is made clear that this C( on merits of the case and the a liberty to decide the same strictly i: cM^(<;i<fli Typ:^Tt '^ fe^ <R»i^i< cfr 3tRW3?IT^T 1NKER DIWAKER (he petitloners. Ptate. in the present petition is that the Ihanik Samkul Coox'dinators since ^se for confirmation has not been ladvertisemeut is issued and if |aid post, the petifcioners m.ay be bubmits that- the representation of jending smce 25.9.09 but the sa.me }ts that ends ofjusti.ee would be ^eciding the representation of the let the petitioners make a fresh juld be decided 'by the authority 1th law. disposed of. In the eventuality of ^ petitioners within a period of one [)py of this order, it is expected, that |a mrther period of four months, in ()urt has not expressed any opinion aluthoritles concerned would be at b. accordance with law. Sd/- pritinker Diwaker Judge ^ +