IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25592 of 2009 SATISH CHANDRA RAI Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 17.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Bank Officials including this petitioner have been alleged for defalcating money of the Bank which allegation according to the learned counsel was specifically upon Mukesh, who deposited the same and has been allowed bail, though regular bail. Two of the co- accused persons namely, Casher and Branch Manger have also been allowed bail by a Bench of this Court. Even then petitioner is apprehending his arrest which cannot be justified. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No. 109 of 2007, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Rosera, Samastipur (Dist-Samastipur) subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)