1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.198 OF 2007 Rasila D/o.Ranchhoddas Naram(Thakkar) ...Appellant vs. Deepak Dhansukhlal Vanjara. ...Respondent. --- Mr.S.K.Jain, for Appellant. Mrs.S.A.Dhamale, for Respondent. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & V.M.KANADE, JJ. DATED: 20th NOVEMBER,2007. P.C.:- 1. The learned Counsel appearing for appellant states that the appellant is restricting her challenge in the appeal only to that part of the order of the family Court 2 whereby Rs.1500/- per month is directed to be paid as maintenance to the appellant. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for both the sides. Admit. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (V.M.KANADE,J.) --- 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.227 OF 2007 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.198 OF 2007 Rasila D/o.Ranchhoddas Naram(Thakkar) ...Appellant vs. Deepak Dhansukhlal Vanjara. ...Respondent. --- Mr.S.K.Jain, for Appellant. Mrs.S.A.Dhamale, for Respondent. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & V.M.KANADE, JJ. DATED: 20th NOVEMBER,2007. P.C.:- 4 Admittedly, during the pendency of the proceedings before the Family Court, the appellant was getting Rs.1000/- per month. Now by the final order, her maintenance is enhanced to Rs.1500/- per month, therefore, we do not see any reason to enhance the amount of maintenance. Civil application is disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (V.M.KANADE,J.) ---