BEFO THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT RE BILASPUR WRIT PETITION S No. 58 wl 2010 / Manoj Durga, S/o Late Hari Durga, PETITIONER: / 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Department of Health & Family Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, C.G.. 2. Director, Medical Education Raipur, C.G. Joint Director & Superintendent Dr. Bhee‘mr‘ao Ambedkar Memorial Hospital Raipur, C.G. RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION > UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION INDIA Aged about 27 years, R/o Shreenagar, R.B.H. colony ““3 42. y; Balaji chowk, Near W.R.S. Colony Eva§v§ ? Raipur, C.G. w 5 VERSUS WW' . W304» Msqea 03 200 mam WWW WWW WWfffs‘z‘rm $aimm KER DIWAKER SB : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRI 20. 19.2Q10 Shri Alok Dewangan, counsel or the petitioner. State. Shri Vivek Shama, PL. for th Grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that Vide order dated 18.5.2010, he was te and pursuant to the order passe 2937/2010, the petitioner has mad a representation on 13.7.2010 but till date the said representation ' as not been decided. Counsel for the petitioner su mits that ends of justice would be served if direction would be i sued for deciding the pending representation of the petitioner as ex editiously as possible. if any such direction is issued for deciding the pending appeal/repr sentationi expected from the respondent NO.2—Director to decide the pendin representation of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible preferab ,y Within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy. of thi order. It would be the duty of the p titioner to apprise the authority concerned about the passing of this rder. it is made clear that this Cou has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the autho ty concerned would be at liberty to decide the representation in accor ance with law. petition stands disposed of. Sd/— Pritinker Diwaker" State counsel has no objectio ln the interest of justice, it i With the above observation, t Judge mm(wha§u) inated from the post of cleaner by this Court in W.P.(S) No. TI