hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10022 OF 2009 Smt. Jayashree Vasant Suryavanshi and Anr. ... Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. R.S. Patil for Petitioner. Mr. C.R. Sonawane, A.G.P. For Respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 07, 2009 P.C. The translation of the communication of 12.3.2009 would indicate that there is proposed 9.0 mtr. wide road going from Plot NO. 7 R.S. NO. 597 Hissa No. A-1 of the development scheme. The Petitioner claims right on the same plot No. 7. Considering the above, in our opinion, no case made out for interference by this court. In the event the Petitioner has any objections to the acquisition of the land, he may file such objections as and when such land is sought to be acquired or if according to Petitioner there is no revised plan, then also petitioner in case revision of plan is sought, can raise his objections. With the above observations, Petition disposed of. (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (F,I. REBELLO,J.)