IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1180 OF 2006. APPLICATION NO. 1180 OF 2006. APPLICATION NO. 1180 OF 2006. IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 780 OF 2006. APPEAL NO. 780 OF 2006. APPEAL NO. 780 OF 2006. Chandrakant Vitthal Pawar. ... Applicant. Versus. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. Smt.Anjali Patil for the Applicant. Shri S.V.More, A.P.P. for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 20th November, 2006. : 20th November, 2006. : 20th November, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate appearing for the Applicant and the learned A.P.P for the State. The Appellant is convicted for offence under sections 363, 366, 376(2)(a) and 323 of the Indian Penal Code. The substantive sentence is R.I. for 15 years for offence under section 376(2)(a). He has been directed to pay fine of Rs.50,000/-. The victim is a minor girl of 14 years of age. I have perused the impugned Judgment and notes of evidence. Considering the ghastly nature of crime, no case is made out for grant of bail. The Applicant was not enlarged on bail during the pendency of the trial. 2. Hence the Application is rejected. Liberty to file private paper book. Liberty to apply for expeditious hearing of the Appeal after it is ready in all respects. Judge. Judge. Judge.