1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1241 OF 2008 Jitendra Narayanrao Gosekar vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri S.J. Khandalkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri T.A. Mirza, AGP for respondent No.1. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. MARCH 26, 2008. Heard. The petitioner's grievance is that he has purchased a land out of proposed lay out from Respondents No. 4 & 5. He claims to have an agreement to sell. He submits that Respondents No. 4 & 5 have sold the land which, according to the proposed lay out, had to be used for public utility and also those places were specified for gardens and playgrounds. The details of those areas have not been given in the petition nor it is mentioned who are the purchasers of such pieces of land. In any case, the lay out even according to the petitioner is not approved. He has made some complaint to Respondents No. 2 & 3. Since those complaints are pending, we 2 do not think that there is anything for this Court to decide at this point of time. Writ Petition is dismissed. Respondents No. 2 & 3 may decide the complaints in accordance with law. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.