1 wp198.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 198 OF 2011 _____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________________ Mr. P.P. Uttarwar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.G. Talhar, Advocate for respondent. 1. Heard Advocate Mr. Uttarwar for petitioner. 2. Appellate Court has found that signature on the agreement for sale was not in dispute and agreement was registered. As per that agreement, the plaintiff was placed in possession. It has therefore accepted that agreement, allowed the plaintiff's appeal and restrained the petitioner from interfering with his possession. There is no jurisdictional error or perversity. Petition is rejected. No costs. (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE. 13.01.2011 gas/wp198.11