-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1222 of 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6010 OF 2002 1. The Collector, Ratnagiri & Anr. .. Petitioners. Vs 1. Ramakant Narayan Pilankar and anr. Respondents. Mr C.R.Sonawane, AGP for the petitioners. Mr S.G.Karandikar, for respondent no.1. Respondent no.2, though served, absent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 21.11.2005. DATE : 21.11.2005. DATE : 21.11.2005. PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Respondent no.2, though served, remained absent. 2. The order dated 22.12.2005, of which the petitioners seek review,was passed disposing of the writ petition in terms of the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms were signed by the parties as also the learned AGP for identification. The review is sought on the ground that the order of the Collector dated 2.7.1998 had imposed a condition on the Gram Panchayat restraining them from transferring any part of the land without prior permission of the Collector. That order was the subject matter before the Commissioner and thereafter before the Government and all those orders were impugned in the writ petition. All those orders, on disposal of the writ petition, merged into the order dated -2- 22.12.2005. Consequently, the condition in the order of the Collector also stood merged in the order passed by this Court. Keeping that in view, in my opinion, no case for review is made out. The civil application is, accordingly, disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)