FARAD CONTINUTION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Application No.359 of 2006 with A.O. St No. 8877 of 2006 -------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office Court or Judge’s Order Memorandum of Coram appearence,Court’s Orders & Directions and Registrar’s Order --------------------------------------------------- Mr P N Kulkarni for applicant Mr. Rajesh Shah for respondent no.2 CORAM; A.M.KHANWILKAR J. CORAM; A.M.KHANWILKAR J. CORAM; A.M.KHANWILKAR J. DATED 13.6.2006 DATED 13.6.2006 DATED 13.6.2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard counsel for the parties. The delay in filing the appeal as computed by the office is l7 days. The ground taken in the application in substance is that due to incorrect advice received by the applicants, initially they preferred first appeal before this court but later on,on correct advice they filed present proceedings.In the process delay of l7 days has occurred. I see no reason to doubt the correctness of the statement made in the application. Explanation offered, in my opinion, is sufficient cause. The litigant should not suffer for the mistake of the advocate. Thus construed this application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) with no order as to costs.