IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.694 of 2009 Dilip Kumar Yadav @ Dilip Kumar Versus Ramji Prasad & Ors ---------------------------------- 04. 19.12.2011 Mr.Ajit Lal, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that by the impugned order the prayer of the defendant-petitioner to recall the order closing the evidence of the petitioner has been rejected and as such it is interlocutory in nature. He has prayed for converting this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in view of the law laid down by a Division Bench of this Court in Durga Devi Vs. Vijay Kumar Poddar reported in 2010(2) PLJR 954. The prayer is allowed. The petitioner is granted four weeks time to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, failing which this revision application shall stand rejected without further reference to the bench. Nitesh ( V. Nath, J.)