: 1 : USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2330 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.10186 OF 2009 Shakuntala Shankar Nagvekar deceased thru Mr. Suresh Shankar Nagvekar & Mr. Sudhir Shankar Nagvekar (LRs) .. Appellants V/s. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Anr. .. Respondents ..... Mr. Laxman Venkatesan for the applicants Mr. Vinod Mahadik for respondent NO.1-BMC Mr. A.A. Ahmedji i/by M/s. Pravin Mehta & Mithi & Co. for respondent No.2 ..... CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATE : 15TH JULY, 2009. P.C. : 1. By this application delay of about 77 days in filing the first appeal is sought to be condoned. I have heard learned advocates on both sides. The filing of the appeal appears to be within time. : 2 : However, there was some delay in removal of the office objection and that is how the office has treated that there is a delay in filing of this appeal. It appears that it will not be proper to say that delay in removal of office objection will result in filing of the appeal at the delayed stage. It appears that there is some confusion about the manner in which the delay is to be calculated. I am inclined to condone the delay by passing the following order. ORDER . Civil Application is made absolute. There shall not no order as to costs. . Delay is condoned. Office to process the first appeal and show it for admission on 29 th July, 2009. (R.Y. Ganoo, J.)