WP. (C) No. 156512011 P TWGNER RE$P£§NDENT$ x- ()J U‘! G) WWW? m: I I x mm UfxmER #‘um tum? .s my-“rrv-uakt arm-Viv“ cu“ rs JV. ,.. .. m &RH§§JW€I1J§$I mv, Mg: AN. makia. Advocaie for the petitioruer. Mr. Arum Sac; Gcvf. Advocate for respondents 1 to 6. m. wheat Pandey, Advocate fax” respondent N0. . QRAL GRLWR (01.04.2031) § i ‘ su, is; KUWR ssNHA‘J. Head The wrii peeiiiiom W hA\ rl... m‘dczn‘ damd (Aimexure~ g; p Vanneal riled by the neiitioner under $ec:tion 9(1) of Chiraliiogarl‘r Public Smt. Ravidani, Wife 0f Gonsar Tigga, aged about 44 years, Occupation Government servant Lecturer Governmem Boys Higher aecwdai‘y School, Patthalgaon, Block Pathhalgaon, District Jashpur (05.). up vzRauo n “A $tate of Chhatiisgarix ihroug the Secretary; Department of Tribal Weir’are, Dau Kaiyan Singh Bhawan. Raipur (C.G.) COiiecior. Jashpur. Disii'iot Jashpur (C.G.). A$si3tant Con‘imissionér, Tribai Weifai‘e, District Jashpur (C.G.) $ub-Divisionai Officer (Reveriuex Patthalgaon, District Jashpur (C.G.3 Pi‘incipai Goverm‘nent Boys Higher Secondary School: Patthalgaon. District Jashpur (6.6.). Biock Education Officer, Paithaigaon, District Jashpur (C.G.). i ni‘i Lam Kumar, son of not known, aged about 34 years. Shikshakarmi Grade-ii. Government Mideie $ohooi (Uoc. a §‘rathmii< $haia), Jhakkadpur, Viiiage Panchayai Jhekkadpur, Presently attach with Biook Education Cffice, f‘ ra‘uiiaigaon, t Districi Jao‘npur (C.G.) -.L- 2? CJF iH§ (30N3Ti? “i‘IQN OF IND e Hifa‘i—i CGURT OF CHHATTREGARH, BILA$PUR ‘aS filed by i‘ne petitioner mainly challenging aeeed by Colieoror Jaoh‘pur, by whioh h Q, )b WP. {(3) Na. 1%5/2611 303.11 ahd issued hotioe to the respohdehts. A3 an intorim measure, it s Premise$ Evictim Act, 1974 wag dismissed. A perusa! 0f me order wouid $how that the Coiiector had deiiied i0 e’nteriai'n the appeai OH the ground thai no natification wa$ ss‘iown t0 prove that Coiiecior wass ‘me competem authority i0 hear the appeai. This Com entertained the writ oetiiio'n on 1 ' aiso directed th‘t Statusqu‘o, in rotation to the subject premises, as it obtairreo' orr 18.03.1‘i, shaii be iiiaihtaihed by the parties tiii the he‘xt date of hearihg. Today Mr. ArLm $30 has fiied a copy of notification dated 23.0669, L? by which the Divisionai Commissioner has been Cieciared as the Appeiiate Autt‘rortt‘y for hearing such appeats. ‘ Mr. ANBhakta, learned ceunsei for the petitioner, in View of the above notification, seeks permission to Withdraw thie writ petition with iibeity to fiie a o‘uiy constituted appeat before the Divieional Commiesionei'. However, he aieo prays that the interim order granted ‘oy thia Coon may ‘oe extended tor some time eo that the appeiiant get the time to tiie the appeai and eeek fLtithei' protection hy the Appeiiate Authority. Coneidering t‘ie taote and oiroumstanoes of the case, the petitioner ie permitted to withdraw this; writ petition with iibeity to tite a o‘uiy‘ constituted appeai heftrethe Appeiiate Authority. The interim order granted on 18.03.11 shaii remain in force for a period of 15 days from today. The writ petition stands finaiiy dieposed of. M There shaii be no order ae to cost. Sd/- sumL KUMAR SINHA Judge rahui .ww,