axwr.@ IN ‘i‘HE fIIGZ‘I COmT .3! WICAWRE' AT BILASPHR (CG) WRIT PE'IITIGN N0. XaydL‘" 9F 2094 t'xi'w'mbr Laue M74 naugrau aged abeut 57 years s/a Kalaaas swan, Werkim as Kaa& Master. ,MLdoUg Schwl mama}; Magarmde r/a Village mahenii mstmet mandari (c); linm'rromn Ann 1T State of chhattisgam,'tlmrough the secretm V Gemral Aéministmtmn Deparment, D.K.8.Bwi1é1m, Raipur gm) ~ District Mmation Qffiaer; Dhamizari Distt Dhamtari .. Primipali‘ n1§ale meal Buéheni’; Mmarlwe Biskrict Bhamkari ‘3» 4‘: panama; maéiesr 'smool Khapxi: nhgnuart District nnameam (CG). nkmbmEnrS‘ WRIT ?ETITIGN UNDER ARTIGLEE 226/227 G? THE wMTXTUTIQN OF INDIA F6! ISSUANCE &F APPROPRIAW WRITs, ORDER$ Am DIREGTION3 i \ MA 'Fwj -gu- / XI—HC—22 k“ b 26~8~2004 On a mention being made, this case is taken up. Petitioneri’s by Shli 'Wghhu k State by Shri V‘VS‘ Rfurfhy, I 1y. Advocate General, with Shri Satish Gupta, Dy.G.A, and Shri Akhil Agrawal and Shm Sandeep Dubay, Panel Lawyers. Heard The matter relates to transfer of t} Counsal for the petitioner/s subm effected iHEgaHy 1n contrawntion of 13W 1 State caumel submitted that th~3 Witheut serving notice for demanc} ofjusii " . . Having heard and consuiereu t opinion on the merits of the case, in the served if a direction is given to the petif his/her grievances and grounds hefhre th a State Government/competent with-of}; .Vi‘ .lit respondent: mom; with a copy of the petii representation being filed. the $tate Govei’mnent/competent authority of the respondents. under the laws shall consider and decide law as early as pos3ible preferably within of the representation. If any contravention of policy or guidelines is brought to the notice, the same be considered on its own merits. Counsel for the petitioner/s prays any grievance of the petitioner's remains available under the law. It is open to the p law. With the aforesaid obsen'ations, tl Consequently M.W.P,, if any, alst Certified copy as per rules. Copy to $tate counsel for compliahoe. we :ogm, , yieiA/o (2&1 , ,e petitioner from the respective placer .tted that the transfer of the petitioneris has been ,nd policy. State counsel opposed it. petitioner/s has straightway filed the petition ce and representation. ac rival contentions, without expressing any opinion of this Court, ends of justice will he loner/s to make detailed representation raising iion and this order, within lO days, and on such the same on its own merits in accordance with six weeks ii‘om the date of receipt/production that after the decision of the representation if , he/she may be allowed to avail the remedy :titioner to avail the remedy available under the iis petition stands disposed of. stands disposed of. i sel- Fakhruddin Va Judge @y \