IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.659 of 2009 Md.Sahadat Ali Versus Sukan Pandit & Ors ---------------------------------- 03. 14.12.2011 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel on behalf of the opposite parties has appeared and has raised an objection that the present revision application is not maintainable as by the impugned order the court below has refused the prayer of the petitioner for taking additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 C.P.C. In view of the aforesaid fact it appears that the present revision application is not maintainable. However, it will be just and proper that an opportunity be granted to the petitioner to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in view of the law laid down by a Division Bench of this Court in Durga Devi Vs. Vijay Kumar Poddar, reported in 2010(2) PLJR 954. As such the petitioner is permitted to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India within four weeks, failing which this revision application shall stand rejected without further reference to the bench. Nitesh ( V. Nath, J.)