^ c^L IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITIONISl No i^,2010 SlBfllB Banctt PETITIONER ^®-'"_]t^ ^•'T^ <}<®' ^' '?>•••" RESPONDENTS Uttam Lal Taran S/o Shri Chhotaku Lal Taran aged about 51 Years, Principal, Govt. Higher Secondary School Dharashiv Block - Nawagarh, Distt. Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) 2. The District Education Qfficer, DistrictJanjgir-Champa (C.G.) WRITPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA y T' n^ *ITH^ITW<re» s^ '<<i<ii<>i<<, ®xilyi<o,[sidiyy,< ..U:..&.A.2.A:...6.ScilL(a. 311^1''ra^T ('^3^tT) TOiiw^ftaan^t SB : HON'BLB MR. JUSTICE PRItIKKER DIWAKER 19.11.302 Shri Ashwini Shukla, co'i.uisf Smt. Smita G-hai, P.L. for ths Counsel for tb.e petitioner g entifled to benefit of two advancel haviag passed B.TJ. exainiaation own cost. It is subnutted that thel petition is no longer res integra decided by the Hon'ble Supreia^ Saxena Z7s. State ofKI.P. 8s Ors. 1:1 for the petitioner. iState. iubntits fhat tfae petitioner is liDcrem.ents on account of he fiefore his appomttaent at .his issue iavolved in the present abd fhe same has been finaliv Court in the case of Asha It is further subniitted thaD siznilar view in its onler dated 6.1 6257/2008. Counsel for fhe petiti|3 order dated 29.4.2010 oassed iol wherein relying upon £hejudgineDJ case ofAsha Ssxeaa (supra) and m aaofher Writ Appeal No. 87j issued for consideration of fh.e increineats as per circislsr dated ( of Madhya Pradesh, after petition. : verificatton Counsel for fhe State subia|ts fhat case of the petitioners would also be considered on the sfeme Unes. ^i^^^li i?m^f ^' fs^ <?<t^R, ^f; aifiw an^r this Court has also Taken a 2.2009 passed in W.P.(S) laner turther submits ftiat tfae Writ Appeal N0. 124/2009, [t ofthe Suprenie Court iu the fhe order passed by this Court '2009, directions have been for grant of two advaace ; 1.9.1974 issued by ttie State of the facts uleaded io. fhe c&se e-t$3 ,yf& s i "%». ^»'y[-HC—78 ^my(T«»*ii<«» 'S'er •*ii<iiciq, ®Tily<i<o,fsi<ni<-iy ^......W.M^.^^^ an^r'T^T (ytsi't1') Sf^V V R;-) VTi sn^v siiiro •^ ^tfllt^ ^f?(t. 5ff1^[ advaAce ia In view of~'above, the direction to the respondent. authc] petitioner for grant of two advai] dated 21.9.1974 issued by the 1 verification of fhe facts pleaded eight weeks froin today. It is ina.de clear that this] optuion ou inerits of the case would be at liberty to decide tt] wifh law. p^tition <fti<ii^ftt irm^ ^* fs^ <f^^i< ^aifinsntw is disposed of wifh a irities to decide the clana ofthe iacrenients as per circuliar itate of Madhya Pradesh after t fhe petitioa wifhia a period of Coiu-t has1 not exuressed anv. aiid. the authority conceraed e sarue strictly iu accordaace Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge ..^•"-^•-.••^"