IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 509 of 2002 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 12.2.2001 in WP NO : 26534 OF 2001 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Rep by its Proprietor Reddy Srirama Krishna Mohan S/o Venkat Ratnam, Kothapet (Mandal), East Godavari District, M/s Sai Alekya Wines ..... APPELLANT AND 1 The Govt. of A.P. Revenue (Exercise Department) Rep by its Special Officer on Special Duty, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner Prohibition and Excise, Govt. of Andhra Pradesh, Nampally, Hyderabad. 3 The Superintendent Prohibition and Excise, Kakinada, East Godavri District. 4 M/s Sai Wines, Rep by its K.Srinivasa Rao, Kothapeta, East Godavri District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant:MR.D.SUDARSHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.Y.VIVEKANANDA SWAMY The Court made the following : ORAL JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari) It is represented by the learned counsel for the appellant that the cause in the Writ Appeal does not survive and the Writ Appeal has become infrcutuous. Recording the same, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to cost. ____________________ Justice T.Meena Kumari __________________ Justice Sanjay Kumar June 8, 2009 MAS.