IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 618 OF 2005 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 93 OF 1999 M/S.BALAJI CONST.CO.& ORS. ....Applicants REPRESENTED BY THEIR PARTNER, MR.HEMANT RADHAKRISHNA SAPALE, Versus SMT.LIRA S.SHAIKH & ORS. ....Respondents Mr. S. D.Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Ms. S. Naik, advocate for the applicant. Coram:- R. M. LODHA & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 5th September, 2005 P.C. At the risk and peril of the applicant, the name of respondent no.16 is permitted to be deleted. If it is ultimately found that respondent no.16 is a necessary party in the Appeal, the obvious consequence of dismisseal of the Appeal may follow. Miscellaneous Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. Necessary amendment be made in the cause title within two weeks from today. R. M. LODHA, J. N. A. BRITTO, J.