IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 16TH OCTOBER 2008 / 24TH ASWINA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 1318 of 2008(S) -------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.8471/2008 Dated 25/03/2008 ..................................................... PETITIONERS: ---------------- 1. ASHWASTHAN M.P., S/O. PARAMESWARAN, AGED 71 YEARS, PALUVILA VEEDU, CHITTOOR MURI, PONMANA VILLAGE, CHAVARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. SMT. MALLIKA, W/O. ASHWASTHAN M.P. AGED 62 YEARS, PALUVILA VEEDU, CHITTOOR MURI, PANMANA VILLAGE, CHAVARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL RESPONDENT: --------------- MR. T.P. SEN KUMAR I.P.S, FATHER'S NAME AND AGED NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER, MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, EAST FORT, THIRUVANANTAPURAM BY ADV. SRI. JOHNSON P. JOHN, SC THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== C.O.C. NO. 1318 OF 2008 (S) ==================== Dated this the 16th day of October, 2008 J U D G M E N T Disobedience of Annexure II judgment in W.P(C) 8471/08 is what is complained of. Today, Standing Counsel for the respondent on instruction submits that they have already made payment of Rs.3,02,580/-. However, counsel for the petitioner submits that the claim is for Rs. 3,07,349/-, with interest till the date of realisation. If any further amount is due, I direct that it will be open to the petitioner to take up the same with the respondent, in which case, the respondent shall do the needful. However, having regard to the payment of a substantial amount, it is not necessary to proceed with the contempt of court case. Closed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE jj