IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11636 of 2008 Shailendra Kumar, Son of Sheo Dhari Ram, resident of Village Chakai Marh, P.O. Mahdaiya, P.S. Meenapur, District Muzaffarpur………………………Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar, through the Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur. 5. The District Superintendent of Education, Muzaffarpur. 6. The Block Development Officer, Meenapur, Muzaffarpur. 7. The Block Education Extension Officer, Meenapur, Muzaffarpur. 8. The Mukhiya, Panchayat Raj, Mehdaiya, Block Meenapur, District Muzaffarpur. 9. The Panchayat Secretary, Mehdaiya, Block Meenapur, District Muzaffarpur………….Respondents -------------- 2 20.09.2011 In view of the judgment of this Court in the case of The State of Bihar Vs. Mamta Kumari, reported in 2010 (4) PLJR 318, today learned counsel for the petitioner fairly confines his prayer on behalf of the petitioner for payment of his honorarium/ salary of the period he had actually worked. The writ application is, therefore, disposed of with a direction to the respondents to ascertain with regard to validity of appointment and working of the petitioner in the school and arrears of his 2 honorarium/salary and pass orders for its payment preferably within two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)