IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.15249 of 2011 Date of Decision: August 19, 2011 Pramod Kumar Siwach ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Rajesh Sheoran, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner had applied in response to an advertisement for appointment to the post of Math Master. The petitioner was eligible and was called for interview. When the result was published, the petitioner did not find his name in the list of selected candidates. The petitioner had a doubt about it and obtained the information under the Right to Information Act for supplying the marks obtained by Roll No.455, which was his Roll No. In response, the petitioner was intimated that he had obtained 56.02 marks with break up which was that he was given 35.02 marks in academic qualification and 21 marks in viva-voce. The last selected candidate, however, had secured 54.07 marks, but ultimately the petitioner was informed that in fact he had obtained 43.74 marks break up of which was that he had obtained 35.7 marks in qualification and 8 marks in viva-voce. The petitioner was also informed through letter dated 5.7.2011, copy of which is Annexure P-6, that the original record was shown to him on 4.7.2011. In this background, the information relied upon by the petitioner cannot help him. No case for interference is made out. Dismissed. August 19, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE