rpa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1109 OF 2008 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1109 OF 2008 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1109 OF 2008 ....................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda . of Coram, appearances, Court’s . Orders or directions and . Registrar’s Order Court’s or Judge’s Order ....................................................... Mr.Baldev H.Bhalwal for the Appellant. Mr.P.G.Sawant for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.Anand Singh for Respondent Nos. 3 to 6. CORAM : S.J.VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J.VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J.VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 24TH OCTOBER, 2008. DATE : 24TH OCTOBER, 2008. DATE : 24TH OCTOBER, 2008. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- . The impugned order proceeds on the basis that the State of Maharashtra is not a necessary party. The learned Judge has not deleted any of the police officers, from the suit. The learned Judge has only deleted the State of Maharashtra from the suit. The deletion of the State of Maharashtra is entirely justified. The Appellant must make the application for interim reliefs as directed by the impugned order before the approrpiate Judge/Court. 2. Appeal From Order is, therefore dismissed.