THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO.46 OF 2011 DATED:20.11.2012 Between: Mother Therissa Nagar (Colony) Abhivruddi Committee Mother Therissa Nagar Vengamukkapalem Ongole Mandal Prakasam District Rep. by its Vice-President Shaik Mohiuddin … Appellants And Dasari Seetaramulu and others … Respondents THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO.46 OF 2011 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Sri Pinaki Chandra Ghose) This writ appeal is directed against the order dt.5.10.2010 passed by the Hon’ble Single Judge, in W.P. No.8200 of 2006. Respondent Nos.1 and 2 – writ petitioners filed the writ petition questioning the allotment of house sites in the land in Sy. No.122/12 of Mamidipalem Village, Prakasam District. A consequential direction was also sought to protect the interests of the original assignees of the land. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the Hon’ble Single Judge, by order dt.5.10.2010 disposed of the writ petition with certain directions. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the said order of the Hon’ble Single Judge, dt.5.10.2010, this writ appeal is filed by the appellant, who is a third party to the writ petition, with the leave of the Court. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The Hon’ble Single Judge by the impugned order while disposing of the writ petition has given liberty to the members of the second petitioner association to submit individual representations to the District Collector detailing the lands in their occupation and thereupon the District Collector/his nominee was directed to get the said information verified and in case they are found to be in possession of the lands originally assigned, they should not be dispossessed without following due process of law. The only grievance of the appellant is that by virtue of the impugned order, rights of the appellant have been affected. Initially, this Court on 1.2.2011 granted an order of status quo in the appeal. According to the appellant, the order of status quo granted by this Court in the appeal is continuing. In the circumstances, we feel it appropriate to give liberty to the appellant to file its objections in the matter before respondent No.4 – District Collector, who shall pass an appropriate order in accordance with the provisions of law, within a period of six weeks from date. Till then, the order of status quo passed by this Court on 1.2.2011 shall continue. The writ appeal is disposed of on the above terms. No costs. __________________________ PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, ACJ _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J 20.11.2012 bnr