IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-36938 of 2010 Date of Decision: February 23, 2011 Seema …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana. … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Ram Niwas Kush, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, D.A.G., Haryana, for the respondent-State. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) This is an application seeking regular bail in case F.I.R. No. 359, dated 30.08.2010, under Sections 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Sadar, Hansi, District Hisar. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that as per the prosecution story, Om Pati, aged about 65 years wife of Nafe Singh and mother-in-law of the present petitioner CRM M-36938 of 2010 had been murdered on 25.08.2010 by the accused husband of the deceased and daughter-in-law, i.e. present petitioner. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner further states that present is a blind murder and there is no eye witness. Case revolves around the alleged circumstantial evidence. Learned counsel further states that petitioner is named in the FIR out of suspicion only. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, states that since petitioner is named in the F.I.R. by the brother of the deceased, hence, she is not entitled to be enlarged on bail. The petitioner is a young lady and had given birth to a child in the first week of July, 2010 and she was named in the FIR out of suspicion that she might be having illicit relations with father-in-law. Without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, it is directed that petitioner be released on bail to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. Disposed of accordingly. February 23, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2