't^ IN THE HON'BLEmGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fCHHAmSGARH) WRTT pErmoN fs) No.3u63. /2oio. SINGLE BEMCill PETITIONER: .^ ,.-•:> \b./-^r ^^' ^y ./••"^^"' k^~' £ «?' ..A" Respondents: Rajesh Kumar Yadav, son of Late Shri Ganeshwar Ram Yadav, aged about 25 years, residence ofvillage Kukurgaon, Tahsil Patthalgaon, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. Versus 1. ' State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Pnchayat and Social Service, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. >S/B" 2. Deputy Director, Panchayat and Social Welfare, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 3 The Accountant General of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. WR[T PETITION UNDER ARTICLE_2260F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA -/ 3-=T •^l'41<yl*l, ®T)1y4i(o,fsjdl-9^ _^ V^.l^)^.^'^^ ?W%"""""""""~"""""--"--"f--^200 sn^naq? (1j?f3^Ef) aii^i w h-u* ^WT 3n^?I sh*i ^niwaftg sii^i chf^Id^ii ^W^ ^f 1^^' <^>1^1< '^sifiinsii^i SB^: Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohart Shrivastava. <j. 14-07^)10 Shri Harish Khuntia, counsel Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Pani No.1 & 2 on advance copy. Shri Anand Verma, Standing With the consent of tearned heard finally. This case pertains to dues/Penston. Leamed counset instructions, submits that the mat Committee. Ijor the petitioner. (I Lawyer for the State/respondents |;ounsel for respondent No.3. |»unsetfor the parties, the petition is Irievarice of non-grant of retiral appearing for the petitioner, on [er may be referred to the Pension This Court, in the matter of| Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & o< directed the Committee to consider thf question of facts were involved. Th{ State Government, pursuant to the| W.P.No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chhattisgarh and others), and ord^ No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgaf another). Thus, this petition is squar^ dated 31 January, 2008 passed in| (supra) as submitted by learned coun^ This petition is accordingly c|i office of the Advocate General is| Committee, within a period of 15 day|s IW.P.NO. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal [here) and other connected matters, matter of retrial dues as the disfxited Committee was oonstituted by the order dated 19-06-2006 passed in Chandrakar Vs. State Govemment of dated 13-3-2008 passed in M.C.C. (h and othersVs. Baijnath Mandal and ^ly covered by the judgment and order W.P.No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal >el appearing for the parties. sposaj of in the same terms i.e., the directed to send the case to the from the date of receipt of a copy of ',E?T-]';i!iK.?—FS/)47—2/2010—l.OS.OOO. XI-HC—78 arit^l w R-fi'* wnan^igiiiw Tumane <i'°=l-<11<<l<rl';1, 8>Tll'<H'ls, fsiciiyy W3L|S7-/I^> sn^r 'TsRi' ('^pf^si^i) •roiiwgfcisn^f 2-- this order. Thereafter, the Committeel officers ooncerned within a further p^ consider and pass order, in accordj opportunity of hearing to the petiti<|iner conoerned may file addltional docum^nts, including payment of retiral dues, ifj within a period of four months from| order. The petitioner shall supply State counsel as well as counsel for tf the same to the Committee. In case of grievance with r| dues, it is not necessary to file a writ| representation/application can be moted stated above. The Pension Committee representation/application, if so filed cji '^FrfcNt^T '^W^ ^ ^^ <pi)^i< ^; sifgif aii^r shall issue notice to the petitioner and iriod of 15 days. The Committee shall |nce with law, after affording proper ^ner. The petitioner and the officers snts, if neoessary. The entire exercise, any, to the petitioner, be completed the date of receipt of a copy of this crie comptete set of the petition to the ie Accountant General for transferring sgard to non-payment of pensionary petition before this Court direotly. The before the Pension Committee, as shall not refuse to entertain the irectly. ^ara^lsbrwastav' ^atundraws^