WP(C) 4101/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE A.POTSANGBAM Heard Mr.B.Chakraborty, learned counsel for the petitioner and L.P.Sharma assist ed by Mr.S.Chakraborty, learned Standing Counsel, Gauhati University. It is stated that the petitioner appeared and passed B.A. part- I examination in the year 2006 and thereafter, in 2007 she appeared in BA Part I I examination but failed. Due to health problem, the petitioner could not appear in 2008 but she appeared in 2009 in both Part II and Part III examinations, und er Regulation 12 of the Regulation for BA,TDC 1+1+1 Pattern (2003-04) of the Gau hati University but her result for BA Part III examination was withheld on the ground that the petitioner got one back paper( AEL) in part II. Again in 2010, t he petitioner appeared in the back paper (ASL) in Part II and she cleared the ba ck paper. However, the result of the petitioner has not been declared by the Uni versity on the ground that she had already availed more than 3 chances and this conclusion was reached by the University, perhaps, taking 2008 as one of the yea rs forming part of 3 years prescribed in the aforesaid Regulation. The learned c ounsel for the petitioner submits that as per Resolution No.12(h) of the Regula tion of the University, which is quoted in the counter affidavit filed by the Re spondent University, a candidate has to clear BA course within a period of 6 yea rs in total. A plain reading of the Regulation 12(h) of the Regulation would mak e it clear that a candidate has to clear BA Part I, II and III examination withi n a period of 6 years with the condition that only three chances shall be availe d in each part of the examination. This issue is no longer Res Integra as the sa me has been decided by a Division Bench this Court in Pinkkham Munglang Vs. Gauh ati University and ors. reported in 2007(4) GLT 878. Mr.Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the Gauhait University, has fairly submitted that going by the entries given in the Register and also l ooking into the Regulation 12(h) of the Regulation of Gauhati University, as afo rementioned, the petitioner is within the time limit prescribed by the aforesaid Regulation. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the Gauhati University to declare the result of the BA, T.D.C. Part I II examination of the petitioner under Roll No.6062 of 2009 of Kanya Mahavidhyla ya, Guwahati, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a certifie d copy of this order. With the above observations and directions, the writ petition stands dis posed of.