IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14187 of 2011 1. Ranjan Kumar Singh son of sri Chandra Bhushan Singh of village Nayaka Barka Baijutola P.O. + P.S. Rivilganj, Dist. Saran ( Chapra) --Petitioner Versus 1. The Union Of India through the Secretary Union of India, Home Department, N. Delhi. 2. The Director General, C.R.P.F., Lodhi Road, C.G.O. Complex, N. Block, N.Delhi. 3. The Inspector General, C.R.P.F. Bihar Sector, Patna-25. 4. The D.I.G. of police, Group Centre, C.R.P.F. Muzaffarpur, Bihar. 5. The Commandant, Recruitment Board, G.C. Muzaffarpur, Bihar. ---Respondents. ---------------------------------- 03 12.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent Union of India. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent which is taken on record. Petitioner was an applicant for the post of constable GD (Male) in Central Reserve Police Force ( for short ‘CRPF’). It is the petitioner’s case that he cleared the physical eligibility test followed by written test. Petitioner was thereafter subjected to medical fitness test which was held on 12.01.2011 whereafter he was found medically unfit for the following reasons:- (i) Knock Knee. (ii) Varicose Veins. Petitioner thereafter medically examined himself by the Civil Assistant Surgeon at Chapra whereafter he was found medically fit. The said document is enclosed as Annexure-3. Armed with the aforesaid fitness certificate, he preferred appeal within time for subjecting him to 2 Review Medical Board. By a communication contained in Annexure-4, the petitioner was directed to appear on 04.03.2011 for his Review Medical test/examination . Petitioner appeared at the Review Medical Board whereafter he was again found/declared unfit for those reasons. Petitioner thereafter filed a representation before the higher authority which remained unattended. In this fact situation he moved this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if the higher authority of the CRPF is directed to consider his grievance set out in the representation and dispose of the same in accordance with law. Learned Assistant Solicitor General, in view of the aforesaid stand taken by the petitioner, submits that the application may be disposed of in the aforesaid term. Having heard the parties and on perusal of the materials on record, this Court is satisfied that the present application be disposed of by the following order:- Let the petitioner file a fresh representation ventilating his grievance together with a copy of the present order before the respondent Deputy Inspector General of Police, Group Centre, CRPF, Muzaffarpur (respondent no.4) within a period of 04 weeks whereafter the said respondent shall consider the representation of the petitioner and dispose of the same by a speaking order in accordance with law within a period of 04 weeks of its filing/presentation under intimation to the petitioner. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)