IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16849 of 2010 1. MADAN YADAV 2. Pankaj Yadav 3. Arun Yadav Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 25.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioners are languishing in jail in a case registered under sections 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. It is alleged in the F.I.R. that petitioner Pankaj Yadav fired shot at the informant which hit in the left hand whereas petitioner Madan Yadav fired which hit the she- mare of the informant but there is no allegation of firing against petitioner Arun Yadav. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that from the impugned order it is apparent that the land dispute is going on between the parties for which 145 Cr.P.C. proceeding is already pending. The injury is simple in nature and the petitioners are languishing in jail since 08.02.2010. Moreover, other accused persons, namely, Barayb Yadav another have been granted bail by a Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 43371 of 2009, vide order dated 04.12.2009. Learned counsel for the State has submitted - 2 - that the charge-sheet has already been submitted against the petitioners. Considering the aforesaid submissions, for the purposes of bail only let the above named petitioners, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in Sahebpur Kamal P.S. Case No. 96 of 2009. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) BTiwary/