BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Ninth day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.9488 of 2011 1 V.SELVI 2 GAYATHRI 3 KARTHIKEYAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 2,3,4 Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DINDIGUL TOWN NORTH POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.757 OF 2011) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. J.ANANDKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused Nos.2,3 and 4 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 120(B), 420 and 406 IPC, in Crime No.757 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned Counsel for the petitioners seek permission to withdraw the petition in respect of petitioners 1 and 2 and to that effect he made an endorsement and recording the same the petition is dismissed as withdrawn in respect of petitioners 1 and 2. In respect of third petitioner is concerned he submits that the petitioner arrayed as A4 and he was charged under Sections 120(b),420 and 406 IPC in Crime No.757 of 2011 and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side) would submit that the de-facto complainant namely Kalidoss on false promise of getting Government Job from the first accused paid a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- and till today no job was offered and the investigation is going on and hence he prays for dismissal of the petition. 4.Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also on perusal of F.I.R it is stated that "1,2 kw;Wk; 3tJ vjphpfs; Bkw;fz;l gzj;ij bgw;Wf; bfhz;l tpguk; kw;w vjphpfSf;F ed;F bjhpa[k;"" and hence, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Accordingly, the third petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Dindigul, and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the third petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The third petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6.The third petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. Sd/- 29/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II DINDIGUL 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTATE DINDIGUL 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DINDIGUL TOWN NORTH POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. J.ANANDKUMAR Advocate SR.No.29521 ssk/05.09.2011 /6c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9488 of 2011 Date :29/08/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/