^) C^t4~ m THE fflGH COURT OF CHBATTISGARH AT BD.ASPUR WRIT PETITION No. -7 "~i OF 2003 PETITIONER Brahaspati Gupta, ^ Son of Shri Sufal Gupta r-^r^ Aged 57 years iis^ ; Asstt. Teacher, [*• ij ^-U?Ol,V. ^^^?'' / Kodpali, <.-'".n^',C?-' >•• ^ . ^A^W '^ :"?••" Development Block Pusaur, District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDBNTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^ . ^f ^^^y "y ,-s ,^\ x: s ^ ^^ 3i;Ta-?'% // w<^'y^ \^f^W 2. Etoector, PubUc Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Educadon Officer, Raigarh(C.G.) 4. Prmcipal, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Pusaur, Raigarh (C.G.) 5. Jagdish Prasad Chauhan, Asstt. Teacher, Primary School, Boirdih, Block Development, Sarangarh, DistrictRaigarh(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 sn^f^i !t;-<i<ti 311^1 »*ii^^lt^t ^ 'S^! -tlWld^, a'dlyie, l»!iytiui< an^T ira^? ^W..2^jy^ NI*<CTI shficn l^ff' sii^i ^tgiwafro 09/01/3004 "«RI^<<rf4l'< <41*1<li'^ FS*^ 'lP^K ^ sdf^FT SW^T Shri Kishoie Bhaduri, coitnscl for the pctitiDaer. Shri Praveen Das, teamed Notice to respondcnt no.5 The pctitioner has prefen|ed this writ petition under Artietes 226/227 of fhe Constttution of P.L. for respondents no, 1 to 4. has been retumcd unserved. hldia , chaUenging the order dated 27/08/2003 (Aiinexure A/l) ^asecd by e responlent no. l by whicfa the petittoner has becn t^ansferred fi»mCtovemment Higher Secondary Scliool at viBage Ko|adapaU under Devetopment Block Pusaur to Primary School, Saraugarh.. of th.c octitionejr is lEualafidc BOpudih, Development Bkwk, Lcaracd counscl for fhc ^ctttioncr subnuts that tfac transfer aod it is oalv to accomiaodate respondeat no.5. He lurtfaer ^ubniits tfaat tfae petitioner inay be allowed to aaake a representa^k»n to respoadent no. 1 to which learaed counsel for fhe State ha^ no objection. Havii^ heard fhe leamcd counsel for fhe parties and having r^ard to fhc facts aad circiuns|tanccs ofthe caae, the petttioner is aUowed to make a detaifed repi^sentatmn raising all his gricvances r F .XI-HC-22 SD^I^I R-ti* SD^I 'StftiW -HlitT '3'n? •^l*llcl*l, a'dl'y'is, I»«ni+il< WWffaillch •^ ^it^i e^it<<R 'yl^'n •L within ten days Scova. today thtrty days fi-oin the date of maaner with a reasoned ordexl <CTtrf^i'4l'i t|N<^l*^ T-^S <f^^i< i;3ipg>T3n^i to respondeat No. l and In nan, respondent No.l ahiall decide 1pie representatjon vvitbin a period of receipt of Ifae sanae in aa objective Tfll then, if thc petitioner haa not already been relicved, he may |be allowed to continue on thc same post. With the abt»ve observ^tioxis and directions thc petition staads disposed of. In vtew of ttiis orderi No.9113/2003 also stand dispt)sed of. Partics arc cntitlcd for cc^-tificd copy of this oidcr. M.(W.)P.No.2810/2003 and I.A. SdF L.C. Bhadoo Judge