1 S.B. Criminal Misc. II Bail Application No.5227/2006 Date : 20.11.2006. HON'BLE MR. SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. H.S. Sandhu for the applicants. Mr. Vishnu Kachhawaha, Public Prosecutor. I have heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the impugned order. The contention of learned counsel for the applicants is that Jagdev Singh is responsible for causing injury on the head of the injured which was dangerous to life and so far as Raja Singh is concerned, he has been assigned causing simple injury. He submits that similarly situated co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by this Court, therefore, the present applicant Raja Singh may also be enlarged on bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 2 I have considered the submissions made before me and carefully perused the material available on record. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the present case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused applicant No.1 Raja Singh on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed by Raja Singh under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that applicant Raja Singh s/o Bagar Singh shall be released on bail in FIR No.121/2006 P.S. Maklawa, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The bail application of applicant No.2 Jagdev Singh stands rejected. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J. vij