1 caf-365-09 pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 365 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 1762 OF 2009 Shri Vinayak Madhukar Bapat .. Applicant Vs. 1. Shirish Janardan Jaitpal, since deceased through LRs. and ors. .. Respondents Mr. S.M. Railkar for applicant. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U. D. SALVI, JJ. SEPTEMBER 27, 2010. P.C. Heard Mr. Railkar, the learned counsel for the applicant. The applicant has filed First Appeal under Stamp No. 1762 of 2009, but belatedly and hence this application for condonation of delay. As per the office note, the appeal is filed beyond time by 263 days. All the respondents have been served and there is no affidavit-in- 2 caf-365-09 reply filed opposing the application. In para 3 of the application the reasons for the delay caused in filing the appeal have been set out. We are satisfied that good and sufficient reasons have been made out to condone the delay and hence the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). (U.D. SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)