IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19820 of 2009 1. MAHESHWAR MISHRA 2. PARMILA DEVI --------------PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 13.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that petitioner no.1 is alleged for marrying petitioner no.2 and further making demand and realising money also while marriage is 27 years ago. Both sons are married and even complainant’s naihar people are not ready to support the allegation levelled by the complainant. Allegation of marriage is also false even then petitioners are apprehending their arrest. Accordingly prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named two petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) - 2 - each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub- divisional Judicial Magistrate, Araria in Complaint Case No. 461 of 2008, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI