IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8549 of 2010 SANTOSH KUMAR, S/o Malchand Rai. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 12.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that a land dispute led to the present occurrence and even though the accused persons were allegedly armed with fire arms but only butt of rifles and pistols were used and the submission is that had the intention been to commit murder the same would have been used for firing but it was more to teach the lesson, let the petitioner above named who is in custody since 30.09.2009 and has no criminal antecedent be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, Patna in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 132 of 2009 subject to - 2 - the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)