4r @ gwrg % OD Qa’a/A 3INQLE BENCH EN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR w. MS) No. §m§§é /2010 6m 1. Pyare Lal Verma S/o Shri Ramdeen Verma aged about 51 Y6ars (Head Master), R/o Village Geetkaira, Pest — Guma, Tah — Palari, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) PETITIONERS : /’ 2. Rewa Ram Nawrange S/o .Budhu Ram Nawrange; aged about 50 years Occupation- (Head Master), R/o Village — Sarsaine, P.O. — Guma, Tah. —Palari, District e Raipur, (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : l.The State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary , Education Department, D.K.S.‘ Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. District— Education Officer Distt. Raipur. ’C.G.) v. 3. Block Education Oft‘rcegBlock — Balodabazar, District ~ Raipur, (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. l. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS : As stated above. J ‘ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH 4T BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S‘) No. 2096 bf20 10 PETITIONERS : Pyare Lal Velma. & another. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : The State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 03: cs 1 vii Ma 1c I.‘ $1111 m 4Qcahgu : LI ‘6'“ giggiihwti‘i. A -im¢ ~ u. I Present: Smt. Renu Kochar, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri RKBhaduri, Pane} Lawyer fer the State/respendente. URBILK (ORAL) (Passed on O3! day ef May, 20m) ,.... Learned counsel appearing for the pemioners submits that the petitioners were appointed ininally as Assistant Teacher on a fixed pay on probation. After completion of their respective probation. period? the petitioners were granted regular pay scale. Learned counsel further submits that the issue involved in the case is asto Whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale wef the date of'init’ial appointment or atter completion ofprobation period. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the issue involtied herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur (for sitar: “tile SAT”) in O.A.No.2745/89 (Madlmkam Yacht am! 56 others vs. Stare oflliP. & others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale we]? the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court, upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers’Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from date of initial appointment. In View of the above submissions made by-learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in the same terms i.e.r the petitioners are granted liberty to make a representation to the respondent authorities, if so advised, to consider their casesrand pass appropriate order. on its own merit and in its perspective, in the light of the order passed by the SAT in A/Iadimkaht Yacht (supra) and subsequently confirmed by the Supreme Court in Special Leave l Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93 by order dated 3-1-1994. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Iv Sd/-