(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 7429 OF 2009 Sow. Vaishali w/o. Rakesh Jaiswal, Age : 29 years, Occupation : Household, R/o. Ramlal Colony, Padampura, Aurangabad (c/o. Suresh Shivnarayan Jaiswal, r/o. as above ) .. Petitioner. versus Rakesh s/o. Dhulichand Jaiswal, Age : 34 years, Occupation : Business, R/o. Satish Motors, Near Sardar Washing Company, Rajapeth, Amravati. .. Respondent. .......................... Mr. A.N. Kakade, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mrs. M.B. Gangwal, Advocate, for the respondent. .......................... (2) CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 15TH DECEMBER 2009. COURT'S ORDER : 1. By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 1st October 2009, passed by the learned Judge of the Family Court, Aurangabad, below Exhibit 18 in Petition No. D.01/2008, thereby rejecting the application filed by the present petitioner for referring her to the Doctor from Psychiatric Department, Medical College & Hospital, Aurangabad, for obtaining opionion whether she is in a position to perform her matrimonial obligation. 2. The learned Judge of the Family Court, while rejecting the application, has found that Dr. Barhale, who had treated the petitioner and who is from Aurangabad, has stated in his evidence, that the petitioner is suffering from psychological disorder. It has been found that there are no allegations that his opinion is bias or otherwise. 3. In that view of the matter, no perversity could be found with the approach adopted by the learned Judge of the Family Court, so as to warrant interference in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. (3) 4. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/writ7429