IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.981 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 16.8.2010 Vijay Pal Singh … Appellant Versus Sainik School Rewari and others …Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr.Justice M.M.Kumar Hon’ble Ms.Justice Ritu Bahri Present: Mr.Sarvjit Singh Khurana, Advocate for the appellant. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M.Kumar, J. The instant appeal filed under Clause X of Letters Patent is directed against judgment dated 12.7.2010 passed by learned Single Judge in CWP No.12035 of 2010. The petitioner-appellant had failed to qualify for the post of Clerk with regard to his computer knowledge having computer proficiency and English typing at the speed of 40 w.p.m. He had secured less marks as against the minimum prescribed ten marks. Before learned Single Judge, counsel for the petitioner has raised an argument that the respondents should have considered the petitioner for written test and interview as well and only after the over all merit is considered, the selection should have been made. The said argument did not find favour with the learned Single Judge who has rejected his claim on the ground that the petitioner has failed to acquire minimum criteria for selection i.e. computer proficiency and English typing at the speed of 40 W.P.M. We are not inclined to disagree with the view taken by the learned Single Judge. There is no merit in the appeal. Dismissed. (M.M.Kumar ) Judge (Ritu Bahri) Judge 16.08.2010 sd