1 Cri.appln.874 of 2011 hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.874 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 122 OF 2011 Maulana Ghulam Yahya Ilahi Baksh ... Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr. A.A. Sonawane, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. D.P. Adsule, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & K.U. CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATED : JULY 28, 2011 P.C. Heard. We have perused the application. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that till the applicants make arrangement for furnishing surety consequent to the order passed by the Sessions Judge on 12.7.2011, the applicant in criminal Appeal No. 122 of 2011 be released on cash security. The learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer. It was submitted that in the light of nature of accusations and the admission of the appeal by 2 Cri.appln.874 of 2011 this court, the application be rejected. Rejection of the application is necessary to secure the presence of the applicant at appropriate stage. We have considered the submissions. We have perused the judgment cited by the learned counsel for the applicant in Sajal Kumar Mitra and Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra, 2011 ALL MR (Cri) 1129. Considering the nature of accusations, we do not find that the trial court committed error in rejecting the request of the applicant for releasing him on furnishing cash security. Application is rejected. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.) (NARESH H. PATIL,J.)