IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6893 of 2009 MUKESH KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 01.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in a Police case under Sections 395, 397 of the Penal Code. It is submitted that the F.I.R. is against unknown. The only material is the alleged confession of the petitioner before the Police inadmissible in evidence. The only additional material noticed in the impugned order of rejection during investigation is that some witnesses stated that one of the accused was married in a particular named village. Since the petitioner was also married in that village, there is suspicion against him. No further material has been noticed. The manner in which the Police has investigated the case, entitles the petitioner bail. Let the petitioner, abovenamed be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Sitamarhi in Bajpatti P.S. case No. 45 of 2008. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)