1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10778 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 1898 OF 2005 The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant VERSUS Apparao Bajirao Jadhav, died L.Rs. Laxmibai Apparao Jadhav & ors. ...Respondents W I T H CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10779 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 1878 OF 2005 ----- Shri N.B.Patil, A.G.P. for the applicant/State in both the applications. Respondent nos. 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 served – absent; and application dismissed against respondent nos. 3, 5 and 9 in Civil Application No. 10778 of 2008 Sole respondent served – absent in C.A. No. 10779 of 2008 ----- CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. DATED : 14th September, 2010 PER COURT : - 1 Heard learned counsel for the applicants. 2 2 These are two applications preferred by the applicants for condonation of delay of 95 days in filing the accompanying First Appeals. 3 For the reasons stated in the applications, it appears that the applicants have explained the delay satisfactorily. Moreover, it also appears that the said delay is not willful, deliberate or intentional and certainly it is not inordinate, and hence, same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 4 In the result, present applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B' thereof and delay of 95 days caused in filing the accompanying First Appeals stand condoned and said appeals be registered and numbered and present applications are disposed of accordingly. [SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.] dbm/ca10778.08 3