1 23 caw.1838.11 ndm FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1838 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 99 OF 2006 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. Shrishail Sakhare for the Applicant. Mr. R.V.Bansode for Respondent No.2. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 07 th September, 2011. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant. 2 Perused the final order passed in the writ petition. The first prayer is for direction against the Special Recovery Officer to pay a sum of Rs. 1,50,000/- alongwith interest to the Applicant, who is the Petitioner. The said amount was transfered to the Special Recovery Officer in terms of the final order passed in the writ petition. The objection raised by the Applicant to the attachment has been overruled by the Special Recovery Officer. The learned counsel appearing for the Applicant relied upon a decree 2 23 caw.1838.11 passed by the Civil Court on 30 th October, 2010. If the Applicant is entitled to recover the said amount on the basis of the decree of the Civil Court, it is for the Applicant to file appropriate proceedings in that behalf and no relief can be granted in a disposed of writ petition. The other grievance is as regards the non payment of costs. If the concerned Respondent has committed any breach of the order of this Court, it is for the Applicant to invoke appropriate jurisdiction of this Court. 3 The prayer clause (b) is for grant of compensation on account of mental, physical and financial loss caused to the Applicant. Such a relief cannot be granted in a disposed of writ petition. It is for the Applicant to adopt appropriate remedy in that behalf. 4 Subject to what is observed above, the application is rejected. [ A.S.OKA, J ]