Cfl/'7W IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION fSVNO. 'fi'7 OF 200^ 7 PETITIONER ^J/ ^m^ %"> «^/ ^6-urendra Kumar Bishal Son of Shri Rasbihari Bishal, aged about 33 years, Presently posted at Govt. Primary School Ganeshpur, Block Basna, District Mahasamund (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^Tl^^orl a.^^' State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of School Education, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The District Education Officer, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.). The Block Education Officer, Basna, District Mahasamund (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE ORDER/ORDERS, DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS. sa HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR SIN6LE BENCM : HON'BLE MR SATISH K. A6NIHOTRI. J. WRrTPEtmON frt N0. 807 OF 2007 Petttjoner versus Respondents Premlal Chouhon Stateof Chhatt-isgarh and others WRIT PETHTON fs) N0. 510 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versus Dilchand Chauhcn State of Chhafl-isyirh andothers WRTT PETTTION (s} N0 819 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Resoondents Surendro Kumar Bishal Stute of Chhatt'isgarh and others WRTT PFTTTION (s) N0 521 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents Ramlal Sahu versus State of Chhattisgarh ond others WRFT pErrrioN fs) NO. 522 OF 2007 Petitioner Reaiohdents versus TopsinghPatel State of Chhattisgarh and others And WRTrPETmON (s)NO^S?3jy2Q07 Petitioner Resoondents yersys Bhnnupratap Sidar State of Chhattisyirh end o'ttiers Present : Mr. P.P. Sdiu, cpunsel for the petitioners. Mr. Satish 6upta, E)y. 6ovt. Advocafe for the Stute/ respondents. OROER (Passedon -this 25th day of January, 2007) 1. Leomed counsel appearing for the petitioners as wie\\ as for the State/respondents jointty submit that the facts and question of hw involved in the present writ petitions are squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kwiw Bharadwcfj vs. Munlclpal Cotporatiwi. Owy and anothw^. 2._ For the aforementioned reasons, these writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of Ya^iwcntKumar Bharadwaj{Su'pm),a^pc\ to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.T.I. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 andl-3-t999 and further whether they have been paid twoodvance increments ornot. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order beplaced on record in connected writ petitions. sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 20060DMPJR-C696