IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38945 of 2008 1. AJAY KUMAR PANDEY @ AJAY PANDEY 2. LILA PANDEY @ LILA DEVI 3. MANOJ KUMAR RAI 4. RENU DEVI 5. DEZI DEVI @ DEZI KUMARI 6. BABY DEVI 7. DHARAMSHILA DEVI @ SHILA MISHRA Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. UMESH THAKUR ----------- 2. 19.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a Police case under Sections 307 and other provisions of the Penal Code. The informant is the father-in-law. Petitioner no. 1 is the son-in-law and the others are family members of the latter. It is fairly submitted that in another F.I.R. lodged by petitioner no. 1 against his father-in-law and others, they have been enlarged on regular bail. The allegations being under bailable sections. The allegations against petitioners 2 to 7 are generalized of alleged assault with their legs. Let the petitioners 2 to 7, abovenamed surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, when they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Dalsingsarai in Angarghat P.S. case No. 38 of 2007, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. 2 In so far as petitioner no. 1 is concerned, he is alleged to have assaulted on the head with Garassa and as per the pleadings in paragraph 9 of the application itself the injuries are grievous. The application is rejected with regard to him. Any application for regular bail on behalf of petitioner no. 1 shall be considered by the court below on its own merits without being prejudiced by the present order. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)