IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.16238 of 2008 Between: Kummari Anjaiah, S/o. Gangaiah, R/o. Pulikali Village, Pulikali Mandal, Medak District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Medak District at Sanga Reddy. 2 The Circle Inspector of Police, Sanga Reddy (Rural) Police Station, Sanga Reddy, Medak District. 3 The Station House Officer, Sanga Reddy (Rural) Police Station, Sanga Reddy, Medak District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.PRATAP SINGH ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the petitioner herein prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not taking any action on the express representation submitted by the petitioner on 1-5-2008 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to conduct investigation in accordance with law.” At the hearing, Sri M.Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is therefore, dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.21036 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 1st JUNE, 2009. kvni