ia €^> HIQH COUXT OF CHHATTISGARH.-BILASPUR Wrjt Petitioa (S) No. 872 of 2009 Petitioner Sm.t. Kusuia Susbiia, Lakra, w/o. Shrui Khristrophar Latera, aged about 39 years, Assistant Teacher iu Primaiy School Jajaga, Tahsil Aiabikapur, Distt. Surguja (CG). R/o. Namnakala, Beliind Karmel School, Ainbikapur, Surguja (CGj. Versus Resoondents li State of Chliattisgarh tfarouph fhe Secietary, Education Deparfcment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. Raipur 2) The District Education Officer, Surguja, Distt. Sui^i.ya (CG) 3j The Block Education Officer, Udaipur, Surguja, Distt. Surguja (CG), fWrit Petition under Article 226 offhe Constitution oflndia) SB: Hoa'ble Mt. Satisli K. Agnihotri, J. Bhupendra Siagh, counsel fer the pctitioner. Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for tlie State. passed on this 11"' day ofFebruary, 2009) With eonseut of learaed counsel appearifcag for both fhe parties, fhe laatter is heard finailv. 2) Leamed couiisel appearing fer the petitioner submits ftiat the petitjpner is entitled to grant of two iacreaients as she bas obtained the D.Ed. certificate on her owri expenses during fh.e service period. Learaed coimsel furfher submits fhat fhe petitioner may be granted Uberty to . make a representation to ftie authorities for graat of two iacreiaeiits pursuaut to the judgajent aad order passed by this 2- ^ c. Court ia the matter of Yashwant Xumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporatlon, Dmrg aad another {2006 (II) MPJR -CG 96}. 3) The State Govemment is uader an obliaation to foBow the law setfled by tliis Coyrt and it is not necessaiy to approach tfais Court by each and eveiy employee when the law lias already been settled toy fhis Court. The euiployees, who are simiiarly situated and have not approached fbe Court, may be treated at par wifh other employees, who have approaclied fhis Court. It is not necessaiy to approach this Court for sitmlar order. 4) In view of fhe foregoiag reasons, fhis petition stauds disposed of with liberty reserved to tlie petitioner. on tbe request of leanied counsel, to make a i-epresentation. If tbe represeutation is filed by tlie petitioner, the same may be considered .aad decided in accordance wifh Isnv, oa its owa aierit as expeditiously as possible, preferably wifhia a period of eights weeks fi-om fhe date of receipt of ffae represeatauon. i' Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge