IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 25TH JULY 2008 / 3RD SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 22514 of 2008(E) PETITIONER: M/S. ESSAR TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE (P) LTD., 36/2624, FIRST FLOOR, CHERAMANGALATH HOUSE SHENOY ROAD, COCHIN-17., REP. BY ASSISTANT MANAGER (LEGAL AND SITE ACQUISITION). MR.BABU PATTATHANAM. BY ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW SRI.SATHISH NINAN RESPONDENTS: 1. PERUMANNA GRAMA PANCHAYAT (SPL.GRADE), PERUMANNA PO., PIN-673026, KOZHIKKODU REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. S.I. OF POLICE, CHERUVANNOOR-NALALAM POLICE STATION, CALICUT 3. N.T.BALAN, S/O.CHATHU, JANDADI THODIYIL CONVENOR, ANTI VODOPHONE, ACTION COMMITTEE PANTHEERANKAVU PO., PAYYADIMEETHAL, KOZHIKODE-19. 4. K.ASOKAN, S/O.SANKARAN, KANNANCHERY HOUSE, PANTHEERANKAVU PO., PAYYADIMEETHAL KOZHIKODU. 5. N.V.BALAN NAIR, S/O.NARAYANAN NAIR NAMBILI VEETTIL, PANTHEERANKAVU PO., PAYYADIMEETHALL, KOZHIKODU. 6. SADANANDAN, S/O.CHETHUKUTTY, KIZHAKKUMPADATHU HOUSE, DO.DO. 7. AZIZ, S/O.IMBICHIVAVA MUSLIYAR, THANDANCHERRY HOUSE, DO.DO. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.C. SANTHOSH KUMAR,. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 22514 of 2008 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 25th July, 2008. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext. P5 stop memo issued by the 1st respondent directing the petitioner to stop the erection of a telecommunication tower in building no. 1/195 to 201 of the 1st respondent-Panchayat. I am of opinion that I should not interfere with Ext. P5 at this stage, since, pursuant to Ext. P5, the 1st respondent is bound to pass final orders either allowing the petitioner to erect the tower or to finally cancelling the permit issued to them. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent- Panchayat to pass final orders pursuant to Ext. P5, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. While doing so, the 1st respondent shall consider Ext. P6 objections filed by the petitioner. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.