IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI MONDAY, THE 20TH DECEMBER 2010 / 29TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 37145 of 2010(P) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- 1. APPUKUTTAN PILLAI, S/O.LATE KUNJAN PILLAI, AGED 60 YEARS, KIDAKOTTU HOUSE, KATTACHIRA, PALLICKAL P.O., MAVELIKKARA. 2. ANAGHA, D/O.LATE KOMALAVALLI AMMA, AGED 21 YEARS, KIDAKOTTU HOUSE, KATTACHIRA, PALLICKAL P.O., MAVELIKKARA. BY ADVS. SRI.K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN, BYADV. SRI.M.D.SASIKUMARAN, SRI.GEORGE MATHEW, SRI.DIPU JAMES, SMT.K.V.RAMYA. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY HOME SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-01. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALAPPUZHA-688 001. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHENGANNUR-689 121. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MAVELIKKARA, PIN-690 101. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VALLIKKUNNAM, PIN-690 501. 6. ANOOP, S/O.APPUKUTTAN PILLAI, AGED 28 YEARS, KIDAKOTTU HOUSE, KATTACHIRA, PALLICKAL P.O., MAVELIKKARA, PIN-690 504. R1 TO R5 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.C.M. CHARISHMA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.37145/2010 P APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DTD. 28/11/2010 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss K.M.JOSEPH & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. * * * * * * * * * * * * * W.P.C.No.37145 of 2010 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of December 2010 J U D G M E N T K.M.JOSEPH,J The 1st petitioner is the father of the 2nd petitioner. 6th respondent is the son of the 1st petitioner. Allegations are made against the 6th respondent that he is threatening the 1st petitioner. It is further submitted that the betrothal of the 2nd petitioner with a boy who is employed in Larsen & Toubro, Bangalore is proposed to be conducted at the residence of the 1st petitioner on 27/12/2010. The 6th respondent has openly declared that he would not allow the conduct of the said ceremony, it is alleged. The petitioners complained to the police and they have come before us. 2. There is no representation for the the 6th respondent. We have already passed an interim order. We dispose of the writ petition after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader directing respondents 4 and 5 to give police protection to the life of the petitioners as against any threat from the 6th respondent as and when necessary. (K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE) (M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE) jsr // True Copy// PA to Judge W.P.C.No.37145 of 2010 2 W.P.C.No.37145 of 2010 3 W.P.C.No.37145 of 2010 4 K.M.JOSEPH & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. .No. of 200 ORDER/JUDGMENT 30/082010