IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39648 of 2008 1. MURTOZA @ MD.MURTAZA 2. Shamima Khatoon Versus STATE OF BIHAR - - - - 2. 16.9.2008 Heard. The husband and wife are living together as may appear from one of the orders passed by the learned Magistrate on 4.2.2008. The petitioners were directed to appear in the court below and seek regular bail under certain conditions. The contention is that after uniting between them the son of the petitioners and his wife, who was the complainant, are attempting to dictate their terms with the old couple by requiring the present petitioners to transfer one acre of land and then only the son of the petitioners could allow his wife to come to court and enter into a compromise with the petitioners so that they could take advantage of the direction of this Court. The contention is that the petitioner no.1 has 2.5 acres of land and has five sons and four daughters and they all have, after the demise of petitioner no.1, their shares 2 under their personal law and that would create an imbalance in shares amongst the sons. As indicated above, the husband and the wife are living together, as appears from annexure- 4, and the petitioners are the parents. In that view, the Court could not take a view different from that indicated in order dated 14.12.2007 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 56120 of 2007 and the court below, i.e., the Sub- divisional Judicial Magistrate, Purnea, shall admit the petitioners to bail, in Complaint Case No.C.A.1062 of 2006, on the same terms as it did to the husband. This petition is accordingly disposed of. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)