The Hon’ble Sri Justice N. Ravi Shankar W.P.No. 1636 of 2002 O r d e r: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. The controversy in this writ petition pertains to the selection to the post of Grade-II Hindi Pandit in the fourth respondent-school. Both, the petitioner and the fifth respondent, who are ladies applied for the said post. Of them, the concerned authorities selected the fifth respondent concluding that she is more qualified and suitable than the petitioner and other candidates who appeared for the selection. Those details are not necessary for the purpose of the questions raised in this writ petition. 3. The petitioner is challenging the selection of the fifth respondent only on the ground that the certificates produced by her viz., the Hindi Vidwan and Hindi Sikshak certificates (which are the necessary qualifications) are fake certificates. Her plea is that she (the fifth respondent) did not attend the concerned institution as a day scholar during the relevant period and therefore the said certificates could not have been issued by the concerned institutions and consequently they must be rejected as fake. 4. On the very same plea the petitioner earlier filed W.P.No. 4470 of 2000, wherein a direction was given to hold an inquiry into the controversy raised by the petitioner. It is seen that initially after holding the inquiry, the whole selection process was cancelled and latter on the fifth respondent filed another writ petition – W.P.No. 19718 of 2001 and again directions were given to hold a fresh enquiry. After holding that enquiry, it was held by the concerned Regional Director of School Education that the selection of the fifth respondent to the post was in order. Thereafter the present writ petition is filed again challenging the selection of the fifth respondent, by the petitioner with the plea that the certificates pertaining to her Hindi qualifications are forged. 5. Sri M. Prabhakar Reddy, the-then Regional Joint Director of School Education filed counter on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2. In the said counter affidavit it is stated by them that they verified about the genuineness or otherwise of the certificates produced by the fifth respondent from Hindi Prachar Sabha, Hyderabad, which is stated to be the competent authority for issuing those certificates. It is further stated that their verification revealed that the certificates are true and the Hindi Prachar Sabha, Hyderabad in their letter No.20/2000 dated: 26.4.2000 informed them that the certificates of Hindi Vidwn and Sikshak bearing No.225/1997 and 21/89 respectively issued to the fifth respondent are genuine. Thus the plea of the petitioner that the said certificates are fake cannot be accepted and no further material is also placed by the petitioner to hold otherwise. 6. One point raised by Sri Venkat Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is for qualifying in Hindi Vidwan and Hindi Sikshak one has to attend the Institution of Hindi Prachar Sabha as a day scholar, but no Rules are filed positively to show that the above plea of the petitioner’s counsel can be accepted. Further it is not the case of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 that there is any such Rule and they have stated that the certificates produced by the fifth respondent are confirmed as genuine by Hindi Prachar Sabha and consequently they say that her selection is valid. 7. In the above circumstances it follows that the contentions of the petitioner cannot be accepted. Accordingly this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. _____________________ N. RAVI SHANKAR, J. August 3, 2011. *BVS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD Wednesday, August 03, 2011. Present: The Hon’ble Sri Justice N. Ravi Shankar W.P.No. 1636 of 2002 Between: K. Victoria ..Petitioner and The Regional Joint Director, Cuddapah and others …Respondents