IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.487 of 2011 JAGESHWAR BHAGAT @ YUGESHWAR BHAGAT @ BATAHU BHAGAT SON OF CHHATHU BHAGAT RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ADHARPUR, P.S. AND DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR. …..PETITIONER. VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE COLLECTOR, SAMASTIPUR. 3. THE JOINT DIRECTOR, CONSOLIDATION, MUZAFFARPUR. 4. THE CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, SAMASTIPUR. 5. RAM SOHIT BHAGAT. 6. LAL BABU BHAGAT. 7. BANGALI BHAGAT. 8. NEPALI BHAGAT, RESPONDENT NO. 5 AND 8 ARE SONS OF PARMESHWAR BHAGAT, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHAKNIJAM ADHARPUR, P.S. AND DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR. 9. MOST. MAYA DEVI @ NUNU DEVI WIFE OF LATE CHANDESHWAR BHAGAT. 10. MANOJ KUMAR. 11. SAMBHU. 12. KAILASH KUMAR, RESPONDENT NO. 10 TO 12 ARE SONS OF LATE CHADESHWAR BHAGAT, RESPONDENT NO. 9 TO 12 ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ADHARPUR, P.S. AND DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR. 13. BIR CHANDRA BHAGAT @ BIRO BHAGAT S/O LATE BRAHM DEO BHAGAT RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ADHARPUR P.S. AND DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR. ……..RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02. 29.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner prays for restricting the private respondents from interfering with the right title and interest and peaceful possession over his ancestral property. The petitioner’s case is that the respondents in the garb of order dated 11.12.2008 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 6409 of 1990 are trying to encroach upon 2 petitioner’s right, title and interest over the property. He submits that he was not a party in the writ petition and even the order of this Court had not conferred any right on the respondents. The petitioner states that he is one of the descendents of late Chamman Bhagat, who was owner of the property in question. The issue involved in this application is one of facts and title, which can at best be adjudicated in civil court. This writ application is accordingly disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate case/application before an appropriate forum. Devendra/ ( Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)