HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH Dated 27-01-2010 SECOND APPEAL No.122 of 2009 & CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2236 OF 2009 Between: V.Ramesh Kumar. …Petitioner. And: Abdul Aziz. …Respondent. HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH SECOND APPEAL No.122 of 2009 & CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2236 OF 2009 COMMON JUDGMENT: S.A.No.122 of 2009: This Second Appeal is filed by the appellant aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dated 13th November, 2007 passed in A.S.No.2 of 2006 by the learned VI Additional District Judge, (Fast Track Court), Nizamabad at Kamareddy, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 27-6-2005 passed in O.S.No.60 of 2003 by the learned Senior Civil Judge at Kamareddy, Nizamabad District. Appellant herein is the defendant and respondent herein is the plaintiff before the trial Court. The status of the parties will hereinafter be referred to as arrayed before the trial Court for the sake of convenience. Originally, the plaintiff filed a suit in O.S.No.60 of 2003 before the trial Court seeking eviction, arrears of rent and damages. The trial Court having observed that the plaintiff is entitled to recover possession of the suit premises from the defendant, rent from the month of June to August, 2002, the claim of admitted rents and damages beyond August, 2002 till the premises vacated and deliver vacant possession to him, decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiff. Aggrieved by the same, the defendant preferred an appeal before the lower appellate Court and the learned lower appellate Court dismissed the appeal confirming the Decree and Judgment of the trial Court. Aggrieved by the same, the present appeal has been preferred before this Court. C.R.P.No.2236 of 2009: This C.R.P. is filed by the petitioner aggrieved by the order dated 6th April, 2009 passed in E.P.No.4 of 2009 in O.S.No.60 of 2003 by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Kamareddy. Petitioner herein is the defendant and respondent herein is the plaintiff before the Court below. The status of the parties will hereinafter be referred to as arrayed before the Court below for the sake of convenience. The plaintiff filed an application in E.P.No.4 of 2009 before the Court below under Order 21, Rules 35, 43, 54, 56, 64 and 66 C.P.C. The Court below made the following order: “Register it as E.P.4 of 2009. Issue delivery warrant as per Order 21 Rule 35 C.P.C. Issue notice and attachment of movable properties of “A” Schedule as per Order 21 Rule 43. Issue notice and attachment of immovable properties in respect of ‘B’ Schedule as per Order 21 Rule 54 C.P.C. Call on 30- 4-2009” Aggrieved by the same, the present revision has been filed by the plaintiff. Since the parties and the issue involved in these two matters are one and the same, the same are disposed of by way of a Common Judgment. Today, when the matter is listed under the caption of ‘Admission’, the learned counsel for the defendant-appellant placed a copy of an award dated 4-12-2009 passed by the learned Lok Adalat Bench at Kamareddy in L.A.Case No.386 of 2009 submitting that on referring the matter to the learned Lok Adalat for settlement in E.P.No.4 of 2009 in O.S.No.60 of 2003, the learned Lok Adalat Bench passed an award dated on 4-12-2009 and in that view of the matter, no orders need be passed in this C.R.P. as well as in the Second Appeal. Recording the above submission, this C.R.P. as well as this Second appeal are closed. No order as to costs. _______________________ Justice G.CHANDRAIAH Dated 27-01-2010. Dvs HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH SECOND APPEAL No.122 of 2009 & CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2236 OF 2009 Dated 27-01-2010