IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 26TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 7TH PHALGUNA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 60 of 2009(S) ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.25506/2006 Dated 19/09/2007 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITITIONER --------------------------- M.S.ROSAMMA, AGED 65 YRS,D/O SAMUEL, RETIRED CHIEF SECTION OFFICER,BHARATH SANCHAR NIGAM LTD,RESIDING AT KUNNUMPURATH HOUSE, THODUPUZHA EAST.P.O,THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DIST. BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------- K.S.SREENIVASAN,AGED ABOUT 50 YRS, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER,BHARATH SANCHAR NIGAM LTD,KERALA CIRCLE,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.MATHEWS K.PHILIP,SC, BSNL THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- C.O.C.60/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 26th day of February, 2009 JUDGMENT Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Annexure-A3 order interpreting rules in question is patently erroneous. Assuming this be so, remedy of the petitioner in relation to Annexure-A3 order lies elsewhere. I do not think it is a matter to be proceeded with under the Contempt of Courts Act. Accordingly, COC is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to take appropriate action in relation to Annexure-A3 order. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs