IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11428 of 2009 RANJEET KUMAR @ RANJEET JAMADAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 17.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The marriage is of the year 1998 and the allegation is about demand and torture for its non-fulfilment but the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that differences were existing in between the wife and husband for day to day affairs of matrimonial life. They decided to divorce for which a panchayti was also held and both separated to each other. Though in my view the divorce is not possible by panchaiti but that can be taken as separation and continuation of demand for such a long period never can be treated for refusal of anticipatory bail. Prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Complaint Case No. 264C/08, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa (Nalanda), subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI