^3 W.P. (C) N0. 64S2/2(M)7 Sugriv Kumar Sahu, aged about 36 years, S/o. Shri Rewa Rana Sahu, R/o. Surgi, Distt. -Rajnandgaon Vs. 1. Regional Transport Auftiority of C.G. D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2. Secretaiy, Regional Traasport Aufhority of C.G. D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 3. Baruiiali Raia Sahu, Bus Operator, R/o. New Bus Staad, Dui^, Distt. Durg (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 236 OF THB CONSTITUTION OFINDIA (SB; Hon'ble Mr. Satlsh K. A^iliiotri, J.) Shri Ajay Shrivastava, counsel for fhe petitioner. Siui Vinay Hant, Deputy Advocate General wifh Shri S.K.Mishra, Panel Law5''erfor the State. 2. {Passed oa this asth day ofOctober, 3007} Leamed counsel appeamug for ftie petitioner subniits fhat on the basis of teinporaiy permit dated 4.10.2007, the petitioner apprehends that subsequent renewal inay also be graated without considering fhe objections of the petitiouer, as has been done is case of the unpugned pennit order dated 4.10.2007, which would come to an end on 31.10.2007. Be that as it inay, no teinporaiy permit should be grauted wifh.out foUowiag due process of law and wifhout considermg the objections raised by fhe petitioner on the said route where accordiag to the petitioner, fhe tuniag is inore or less the saine. Wifh fhe above observatious, tfae petition staiids disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge °yr'