- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4222/2008 Smt.Parwatibai w/o Maroti Bansode. ...Applicant.. (Org.complainant) Versus Shri Murlidhar Nivruti Yedole & another. ...Respondents... ..... Shri M.D. Shinde, Advocate for applicant. Shri K.A. Kadam, Advocate for respondent no.1 (absent). Smt.A.V. Gondhalekar, APP for respondent no.2. ..... CORAM: P.V. HARDAS, J. DATE: 26.07.2010 PER COURT: - 2 - 1] By this application, the applicant / original complainant takes exception to the order passed by the Ad Hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Latur, dated 21.7.2008, below Exhibits 35 and 49 in Special Case No.9/2007. 2] It appears that the present applicant had filed complaint before the Superintendent of Police, Latur, in respect of the alleged threats given to her by the accused. On the basis of said complaint, an inquiry came to be initiated and the police submitted supplementary investigation papers. On the basis of the complaint of the complainant, certain other offence came to be registered against the accused vide Crime No.109/2006. Presently we are concerned with the complaint lodged by the present applicant in respect of the threats given to her by the accused. The aforesaid complaint came to be annexed along with the charge- sheet. The trial Court, therefore, rightly concluded that the aforesaid offence, even if registered, could not be tried along with the trial of the offence with which the trial Judge was concerned and, therefore, held that the prosecution could take separate action in respect of the aforesaid complaint i.e. threats given to the complainant during the pendency of the prosecution. 3] I have heard Shri M.D. Shinde, learned counsel for the applicant and Mrs.A.V. Gondhalekar, learned APP for the State. According to me, the trial Court has correctly concluded that the aforesaid offence could not be tried along with the offence with which the accused were charged and the trial in respect of which was pending. I do not notice any error in the observations of the trial Court to warrant - 3 - any interference in this application u/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Consequently, this application is dismissed with no order as to costs. (P.V. Hardas, J.) ndk/cr267102