l^-:' iti.-/ul^i»tfc< HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (2271 No. 3780 of 2011 PBTITIONBR Non-AoDlicant RE8PONDEMTS Versns 1) 2) Vijay Kuiaar Agiawal, S/®late Sbri Lakhan Lal Agrawal, agcd about 62 yeara, R/o E-156B, Samta Cotony, Rarpur, Tahsil and District Raipiu- (C.G.). Smt. Sire Kunwar Danuaatii, Wd/o late Shri Mohaa Lal Damaaiu, tfaro^h Power of Attomey Rajkuiaar Daminani, S/o late Stui Mohau Lal DaDuaani, aysd about 44 years, R/o Rains^ar Para, Ralpur (C.G.). (APPLICANT» Additional Tahsildar, Tahsil Coiirt, G.E. Road, . Raipitr, Distri.et Raipur (C.G.). WMT PBTITION UNDBR ARTICLB 2SS7 OF THS COVWmVTIOSI OF TODIA. (8B :Hon'ble Mr. T.P.Shnraaa, J.) Present:- Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate for the petftioner. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Agrawal, P.L. for the State/respondent No. 2. ORAL- ORDER (Passedoa IS/07/2011) 1. By fhis pctition under Article 227 of the Constitutioa of India petitioiwr baa chaUenged fhc legalily and ptopriety of thc order dated 26/5/2010 passed by Additioiial Tahsildar, Raipur District Raipur C.Q. ia No. 247/K/Vachak/Addl.Tah./2010 Raipurdated 26/5/2010. 2. Leamed counsel fbr the petitioaer subnaits fhat TahaUdar Raipur has decided the case as revenue case No. 06/A-70/ycar 2009-2010 wide order dated 17/6/20ll therefore fhis petition having becoaae infi-uctuous, 3. Consequenfty, petition is dismissed as haviag become iuftuctuous. -No order as to costs. Sd/- T.p.Sharma judge ^