CWP No. 277 of 2002 2.9.2008 Present: Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the petitioners. Learned Additional Advocate General representing the writ petitioners says that after the passing of the impugned judgment by the Tribunal, respondent was re- engaged and after that he voluntarily left the job on 31st August, 2003. He further says that the department concerned does not intend to effect any recovery on account of payment of wages of respondent on account of his having been re-engaged in compliance with the impugned judgment of the Tribunal. In view of the above stated position, especially the fact that the respondent has not been in job for the last about five years and the concerned department does not want to effect any recovery from the respondent on account of wages paid to him for his engagement in compliance with the judgment of the Tribunal, the present writ petition becomes infructuous. The same is, therefore, dismissed as such. (R.B. Misra), J. September 2nd, 2008(vs) (Surjit Singh), J.