IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.377 of 2010 1. RAM BACHANI DEVI W/O LATE RAM NARAIN CHOUDHARY@ RAM NARAIN RAM@ RAM NARAIN MALLAH 2. RAM NATH CHOUDHARY @ RAM NATH RAM, SON OF LATE JAGDEV CHOUDHARY. 3. KEDAR NATH CHOUDHARY S/O SHRI RAM NATH CHOUDHARY ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JALILPUR, P.S. RAJPUR, DISTRICT BUXAR. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY CUM COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. COLLECTOR, BUXAR DISTRICT, BUXAR. 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BUXAR DISTRICT, BUXAR. 4. OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, P.S. RAJPUR, BUXAR DT. 5. RAJDHARI RAM. 6. DEVDHARI RAM. BOTH NOS. 5 AND 6 SONS OF LATE RAM SWARUP RAM 7. RAM DULAR RAM 8. RAMA SHANKAR RAM. BOTH 7 AND 8 SONS OF LATE KESHO RAM 9. SITARAM RAM @ SITA RAM SON OF LATE BARSATI RAM ALL NOS. 5 TO 9 RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JALILPUR, P.S. RAJPUR, DISTRICT BUXAR. ----------- 2. 03.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent nos. 5 to 9 are intimidating the petitioners with respect to the land in question, even though, they lost in civil proceeding as well as in writ proceeding. Learned counsel appearing for the State 2 submits that in case any unlawful acts are being taken on the part of the respondent nos. 5 to 9, the petitioner ought to have lodged a regular case against them or approached the concerned Chief Judicial Magistrate by filing a complaint. Considering the submissions of the parties and the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter at this stage. However, it will be open for the petitioner to take appropriate steps before the appropriate forum as per law. This writ application stands disposed of with the above observations. Amrendra/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)