IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26583 of 2009 KHALILUR RAHMAN @ TETNA & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 25/07/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. On the previous occasion the application was withdrawn to surrender and seek regular bail in view of a compromise. Renewing the prayer for anticipatory bail it is submitted that certain facts could not be properly brought to the attention of the Court. This Court is not satisfied that the same can constitute sufficient ground to reconsider the prayer for anticipatory bail. The petitioner cannot blow hot and cold at his convenience. Notwithstanding that this Court has declined to entertain the present application, any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioners shall be considered by the court below on its own merits, without being prejudiced by the present order of rejection. Considerations for grant of anticipatory bail and for regular bail are entirely different. That this Court may not have found it a fit case to entertain a 2 renewed prayer for anticipatory bail, shall not take away the independent jurisdiction of the court below to be exercised in accordance with law while considering an application for regular bail. The application is rejected. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)