1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.836 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.836 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.836 OF 2008 Suraksha Rakshak and General Kamgar Sena .. Petitioners vs. Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane District & Ors. .. Respondents Ms.Ranjana Todankar for the petitioners Ms.Lata Desai i/b Ms.Pallavi Divekar for respondent nos.1 Mr.S.S.Phatak for respondent nos.2 Mr.S.Nishant i/b M/s.L.J.Law for respondent nos.3 CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE: 2ND FEBRUARY, 2009 DATE: 2ND FEBRUARY, 2009 DATE: 2ND FEBRUARY, 2009 P.C. 1. The learned counsel appearing for the Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane District states that the persons who are working as Security Guards and are not registered may make a fresh application to the Board after the notification is published. 2 2. The learned counsel appearing for the Board states that the notification by way of advertisement would be published in due course of time i.e. within 4 to 6 weeks. If that is so, we need not entertain the petition. as the petitioner Union, if it is registered and recognised, may represent the cause of its members and apply to the Board and can get them registered. With this observation, petition stands disposed of. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.) (Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.) (Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.)