- 1 - rev451 rng IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.REVI.APPLICATION NO.451 OF 2008 1.M/s Avinash Automobiles 2.Murlidhar Madhav Purandare 3.Avinash Murlidhar Purandare 4.Atun Murlidhar Purandare .. Applicants vs 1.Dattatraya Bandoba Shinde 2.The State of Maharashtra.. Respondents Mr.Dhiraj Kalantri i.b Mr.V.V.Purwant for Mr.Rupesh Zad i.b.Mr.Rahul Kate for Respt no.1 Mr.S.A.Shaikh APP for State CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J DATE: 13th September,2011 P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Accused- Applicants. In a prosecution under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, pending since 2004, an Application was moved below Exhibit 55 to recall the witness and by an order dated 13.8.2008 it was rejected. - 2 - rev451 Hence, the present Revision. 2. The learned Judge has observed that prior to making the impugned Application, already Application below Exhibit 54 was moved by the Accused-Applicant. It was rejected. Applicant-Sunil was asked to cross-examine the witnesses. Witnesses were indeed cross examined and thereafter the matter is dragged. Identical Application below Exhibit 55 in fact situation was rightly rejected by the learned Judge. It creates impression that the matter is dragged for no reason. I do not see any merit in the Revision Application. Dismissed. K.U.Chandiwal,J