IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS LETTERS LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.67 OF 2007 PATENT APPEAL NO.67 OF 2007 PATENT APPEAL NO.67 OF 2007 WITH WITH WITH CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.77 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.77 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.77 OF 2007 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.6819 OF 2006 PETITION NO.6819 OF 2006 PETITION NO.6819 OF 2006 Mysore Petrochemicals Ltd. & Ors. ...Appellants/ Applicants V/s. Dastgir Alam Mulla & Ors. ...Respondents None for the appellants-applicants. Mr.N.G. Helekar, Advocate, for Respondent No.1. Mr.R.M. Patne, AGP, for Respondent Nos.2 & 3. CORAM CORAM CORAM : J.N. PATEL & : J.N. PATEL & : J.N. PATEL & A.A. A.A. A.A. SAYED, JJ. SAYED, JJ. SAYED, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 13TH AUGUST, 2007. : 13TH AUGUST, 2007. : 13TH AUGUST, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. None for the Appellants-Applicants. 2. Heard. 3. This Letters Patent Appeal has been filed by the Appellants-employers impugning the judgment of the learned Single Judge, wherein the learned Single Judge found that the Respondent can be permitted to be represented by his nominee in the departmental enquiry. 4. We find that the view taken by the learned Single Judge cannot be said to be contrary to the law. We further find that the enquiry is prolonged mainly on this trivial issue. Therefore, in the facts and circumstances, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. 5. The Letters Patent Appeal stands dismissed. 6. In view of the dismissal of the Letters Patent Appeal, the Civil Application does not survive and the same stands disposed of accordingly. [A.A. [A.A. [A.A. SAYED, J.] SAYED, J.] SAYED, J.] [J.N. [J.N. [J.N. PATEL, J.] PATEL, J.] PATEL, J.]