1` IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 4501/2007 Vijay Vishnu Saoji vs. State of Maharashtra though the Additional Collector, Buldhana and others. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : A.P.LAVANDE, J DATE : 4.9.2008 Heard Mr. Anand Parchure, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. T.A.Mirza, learned A.G.P. for respondents 1 to 3 and Mr. F.T.Mirza, learned counsel for respondent no.4. The learned counsel for the respondents state that under Clause 15 of the Maharashtra Kerosene Dealers Licensing Order, 1966 the remedy by way of revision is available to the petitioner and the said remedy is quite efficacious. In view of this statement Mr. Parchure, seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail of the remedy of revision. Mr. Parchure, further states that the Revisional Court be directed to dispose of the revision within the time frame. The learned counsel for the respondents have no objection. In view of the above the petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file revision to the State Government. In case the petitioner chooses to file revision application against the impugned order the State 2` Government shall decide the same within a period of six months in accordance with law. The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. Judge patle