THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13703 of 2010 Date: 18.6.2010 Between: Sangu Krishna Venkata Ramana Murthy, Sri Alluri Sitaramaraju Nagar, Visakhapatnam. ………...Petitioner And The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam and others. …… Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13703 of 2010 ORDER: This writ petition has been filed by Sangu Krishna Venkata Ramana Murthy assailing the action of the respondents in summoning him to the Police Station without there being any case registered against him. The petitioner is the President of Adi Andhra Yuvajana Seva Sangam of Valmiki Nagar, Marripalem, Visakhapatnam. The said Sangam is registered under the Societies Registration Act. The petitioner filed W.P.No.3995 of 2008 for allotment of house sites to the members of the Sangam. Subsequently, some disputes arose between the members of the Sangam. According to the petitioner, some members of the Sangam made a complaint to the Assistant Commissioner of Police, North Zone, Visakhapatnam-3rd respondent, and, thereupon, the Station House Officer, Kancharapalem, Visakhapatnam made a General Dairy with G.No.42/General/ ACP(N)/2010 on 19-4-2010. The petitioner filed anticipatory bail application before IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam. The said application came to be dismissed on representation of the police that there was no complaint or crime registered against him. On coming to know of the entry in the General Dairy, the petitioner again filed Crl.MP.No.1314 of 2010 on the file of IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam. The said application ended in dismissal on the representation of the police that there was no complaint or crime registered against him. Despite the said statement made before the concerned Court, the police, according to the petitioner, has been frequently calling him to the Police Station. Hence the writ petition. When the writ petition came up for consideration, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home takes notice on behalf of the respondents. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents. The material brought on record reveals that the petitioner earlier approached the Court of IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam seeking anticipatory bail. The said application ended in dismissal on the statement made by the police that there was no complaint or crime registered against him. Such is the statement made by the police, it is impermissible for the police to summon the petitioner frequently. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents not to summon the petitioner to the Police Station without there being any complaint against him. This order does not preclude the authorities to take necessary action in the event of any complaint being presented against the petitioner by the aggrieved party. ______________________________________ JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY Date:18.6.2010 mrb