IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 2598 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 24, 2008 Rajinder Singh and others ...... Appellants Versus Siala Ram and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.G.S.Hooda, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. R.K.Battas, Advocate for the respondents. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. This appeal has been filed against the concurrent judgments of the Courts below dismissing the suit filed by the appellants to challenge the alienation made by the father on the ground that the property was ancestral and the alienation had been made without legal necessity. Both the Courts have found as a fact that the alienation was for legal necessity. Learned counsel for the appellants has not been able to persuade me that this finding is either perverse or that it cannot be held to arise from the material on the record. Consequently I dismiss this appeal, however, with no order as to costs. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE December 24, 2008 sunita