IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 26TH MAY 2008 / 5TH JYAISHTA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 1571 of 2005(S) ---------------------------------------------- AGAINST OUT OF THE JUDGEMENT IN OP.27258/2001 Dated 14/09/2001 .................... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS: ----------------------------------------- 1. A.S.LENIN, S/O.SANKARAN, AGED 59 YEARS, ANATT HOUSE, P.O.VADAKKEKARA, NORTH PARUR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. N.M.KURIAKOSE, S/O.MATHEW, AGED 59 YEARS, NJALIYAM PARAMBIL HOUSE, VENGOLA, PERUMBAVOOR. 3. P.A.SIVANANDAN, S/O.KUMARAN, AGED 59 YEARS, MARAYIL HOUSE, ALANGAD P.O., NORTH PARAVOOR, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.SATHISAN RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------------ MR.K.P.SOMARAJAN (AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS), THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.JOHNSON P.JOHN. THIS CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Cont. Case (Civil) No.1571 of 2005-S ------------------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 26th day of May, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu, C.J. The complainants are before us in this contempt petition, inter alia contending that the respondent has disobeyed the orders and directions issued by this Court in O.P.No.27258 of 2001 dated 14-9-2001. 2. Sri.Johnson P.John, learned counsel appearing for the respondent, on instruction, would submit that the respondents have faithfully complied with the orders and directions issued by this Court. 3. We have no reason to disbelieve the statement made by the learned counsel. Therefore, at this stage, it may not be necessary to proceed with the contempt petition. Accordingly, the contempt proceedings are dropped, for the present. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners/complainants to approach appropriate authorities, if for any reason, they have any other grievances. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE (T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) JUDGE MS