6ta:iua«U; »»<-S*i!ti>'ii" 'iniS c. F fo-s> 7-— (2) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0r7/-s'^ /2006 PETITIONER .k/^^ \'y~i^y'' /'' '••'' /''.•'~ -•'* ^&^ ^y' Dhaja Ram Lahare Age about 48years, AssistantTeacher, S/o Shri Firat Ram Lahare Govt. Middle School, Dhanpur, Block- Sakti, Distt. - Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS «<s~ RESPONDENTS ^ 0 ^ 1. State Government ofChhattisgarh Through:- Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) .^ s^.::: <3>'- 2. District Education Officer Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Petitioners most humbly submit as under:- HI6H COURT HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BU^SPUR W. P.(S) No. 6988 of 2006 Petitioner : Rameah Kumar Tripathi Versus Respondents : State 6ovt. of Chhathsgarh ond onolher W. P.(S) No. 7156 of 2006 Petitioner : AAanbodh Ram Kaiwnr Versus Respondents : Stute &»vt.of Chhattis9arh and othcrs W. P.fS) No. 7157 of 2006 Petitioner : Komal Prasad Poikara Versus Respondents : Stute 6ovt. of Chhart-l'isgarh and others W. P.fS) No. 7158 <yf 2006 Petitioner : Kajendra Kuinar Ratiwre Versus Respondents : State 6ovt. of Chharttisgorh ond olhers W. P.fSl No. 7159 of 2006 Petitioner : Dhqja Ram Ldhare Versus Respondents : State 6ovt. of Chhatt'isgarh and arxrrtier W. P.fSl No. 7160 of 2006 Petitioner : Bhaitti Lal Kamiiar Versus Respondents : Stete 6ovt. of Chhtttti^arh and onother W. P.fS) No. 7161 of 2006 Petitioner : Chhedi Lal Puitom Versus Respondent? : Stwte 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh cnd another W. P.fS) No. 7162 of 2006 Petitk>ner : Bund Roun Paiknra Versus Respondents : State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh ond anolher W. P.fSl No. 7163 of 2006 Petitioner : A^ohon Rum Netam Versus ftespondents : State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh and o-thers W. P.fSlNo. 7164 of 2006 Petitwner ; Ku. Suraj Sori Versus Respondents : State 6ovt. of Chhntt'isgarh and others W. P.K) No. 7165 of 2006 Petitioner : Jcgbondhu Samra'th Versus Respondents : State 6ovt. of Chhcrttisgarh and o-thers W. P.(S\ hto. 7166 of 2006 Petitioner : Amrit Lal Sahu Versus Respondents : State 6ovt. of Chhatt-isgarh ond o'thers W. P.fS) No. 7167 of 2006 Petitioner : Mohd. Hamid Honif Versus Respondents : State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh and olhers —--——— And W. P.fS) No. 7168 of 2006 Petittoner : Rohit ftam AAohaveer Versus Respondents : State 6ovt. of Chhuttisgarh ond others SB: Hon1>le AAr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J Present: Mr. Ajay Shrivastuva, counael for the petitioner(s). Mr. Anm Sao, Sovemment Advocate for Stort'e/respondents. ORDER (Passed on this 22"1 chy of December, 2006) The following order of -the Court is passed by Satish K. Agnihotri. J. 1. Learned counsel appearing for •the petitioners as w»elt os for •the Stnte/respondents jointly submit that -the facts of the present writ petitron are simitar to that of in W. P. (S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwori and o-thers vs. Stcrte 6ovt. of Chhtrttisgcirh A o-thers), which wws odlowed vide order dated 7.1t2006. They furttwsr submit that the question of bw»involved is also the some. 2. In view of •the above staited aibmiasions made by leamed counsel for Ihe ptirties the writ petitions are allowed terms of the order dated 7.11.2006 passed by Ihis Court in 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari uid o-thers vs. State 6ovt. of Chhcrttisgarh & o'thers). No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on record in connected matters. Subhuh Sd/- Satish K. Agnihottri Judge