IN II lit I 11(111 C01 ‘RI 01 KAR\ U AK.\ CIRCL ii 131 NUt I A 1 1)1 IARWAI) 1X 11.1) II 115 1111 20’” I)AY 01 SF1’ 1 FMI3FR 21)11 131.1 ORE till lIONi3l 1: MR. JL’S[IUI ANANI) I3YRARI i)1)\’ CRIMINAl. 1)1:111 ION No.10594 2011 BE FWF1:N: I. Raju Shhaji Ilundre Age: 37 >ears. 0cc: Senice. In u.s.i. hospital. Rn Konnur. 1 q: (lokak. 2. Smt.Prema Shi’.aji ilundrc Age: 63 > cars. 0cc: I louse work. R o Konnur. I q: (jokak. 3. 1)ecpak Shi aji I lundre Age: 23 >ears. 0cc ILA.M.S. Student R o (ihataprabba. 1 q: Gokak. 4. Rekha Raju Path Age: Major. 0cc: 1 hou%ehold R o I Iindalagi-IIeedi. I LI: Khanapur. 5. RajuPatil Age: Major. 0cc: PHi ate ork. R o I Ihndala,ai-I3ecdi. I q Khanapur. 6. Mohan Patil Age: Major. 0cc: Prk ate Work. R o I )indalagi-IIeedi. 1 q: Khanapur. Petitioncrs (B’ Shri. M.J.Peeriade. Advocate.) S AM) [he State ci Karnataka I bough P.5.1.. Kakati Police Station. It by SPP. Dhansad. Re’pondent B> Shri Viinay ak S. Kulkarni. I ugh Court gos crnment Pleader) [his Criminal Petition is tiled under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the complaint and all further proceedings arising out of the complaint in Kakati P.S.Cr.No. 33 2011 pending before the JNIIC-IV. Belgaum. registered thr the offenecs punishable under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code. 1 his petition coming on tiff admission this day. thc Court made the following: ORDER I leard the learned counsel thr the petitioner. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would seek to make out a ‘cry strong case for discharge. I losses er it is improper tbr this Court at this stage. in these proceedings. to ins oke the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the (‘ode of Criminal Proccdure. I‘r. to di%charge the accused. 3. 1 he learned counsel for the petitioner would point out the relationship bet” een the parties and their location being ph> sically away from the matrimonial home of the complainant 6 which would make it impossible for any allegation of dowry harassment and there cannot ha e been any such instancc ha’ tug regard to the circumstances in respect of each of the petitioners. It is the aidas our of the learned counsel lbr the petitioner to demonstrate that the entire proceedings are itiated and arc moth ated only by the sheer engetiil attitude of the complainant to implicate the present petitioners in a false case. Though the arguments of the learned counsel s ith reference to the facts certainly appear to he acceptable. it is more appropriate for the learned counsel to present this case belbre the trial Court and seek discharge. at the appropriate time since the Court below would ha e the benefit of the record with reference to which it can address the facts alleged. Accordingly. without prejudice to the case of the petitioners which they shall be at liberty to present hetbre the trial Court. the present petition is disposed ol 4. 1 he learned Go ernment Pleader is permitted to tile his memo ofappearance within four weeks. Sd/a JUDGE Mrk/