Chamel Singh Versus State of Haryana CRM No.M-22456 of 2011 Present: Mr. Nonish Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Shalini Attri, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Yash Pal, Advocate, for the complainant. ---- The petitioner seeks concession of regular bail in a case registered at the instance of Balbir Singh complainant alleging that on 9.05.2011 the petitioner along with Chander Sheikhar, Chander Kant, his sons, Harish Chander, Harpal Singh, Vikram Singh alias Bhim, Anil alias Pillu, Jaswinder Singh alias Puppi, Karan Singh, Devinder Singh, Babbri, Mohan, Sohan, Balwinder, Parveen Mahala etc. had entered the house of complainant and inflicted injuries on the person of complainant and his brother Roshan Lal and other family members. Seven persons named in the FIR have been found innocent during investigation. Petitioner has not been attributed any grievous injury. The grievous injury has been attributed to Chander Sheikhar non-petitioner. Counsel for the complainant has opposed the application for regular bail contended that in the manner in which the offence has been committed, the petitioner should not be granted the concession of bail as eight persons have been injured. I have taken into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case. The dual version regarding the occurrence has already cropped up with declaration of seven persons as innocent persons. Taking into consideration the nature of injury attributed to the CRM No.M-22456 of 2011 -2- petitioner and the period of detention suffered by him, he can be granted the concession of bail. I do not find any force in the contention of the counsel for the complainant that the main accused has yet not been arrested. The petitioner cannot be kept in custody till arrest of co-accused. Petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the CJM, Karnal. (M.M.S. BEDI) 05.09.2011 JUDGE manju