IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.2285 OF 2005 PETITION NO.2285 OF 2005 PETITION NO.2285 OF 2005 M/s.Archana Securities Pvt. Ltd....Petitioners Vs. National Stock Exchange of India Limited & Ors. .....................Respondents Mr. Sajan Ommen with Ms. Shalini Rajput for the Petitioner. Mr.Kumar Desai i/b. Maneksha & Sethna for respondent No.2. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE: DATE: DATE: 20TH OCTOBER,2006 20TH OCTOBER,2006 20TH OCTOBER,2006 P.C. . Statement of the petitioner was recorded on 10th October, 2006 that prayer Clauses (a) and (b) no longer survive. Prayer clause (b) is only relief for recovery of money. 2. The entire case of the petitioner is based on the amnesty scheme of SEBI by which persons who are defaulters as on 15th July, 2004 both of principal and interest were given certain benefits. It is pointed out on behalf of SEBI that the petitioner paid all his dues as on 24th June, 2004 and as such is not a defaulter and consequently was not entitled to the benefit of the scheme. It is further pointed out that pursuant to a general letter issued the petitioner had paid certain additional amount which has been returned to him by letter of October, 2005. Considering the above, we are of the opinion that this would not be a fit case for us to exercise our extra ordinary jurisdiction. If the petitioner has any other remedy by way of suit it will be open to him to pursue that remedy, if so advised. (ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,J). V. MOHTA,J). V. MOHTA,J). (F.I. (F.I. (F.I. REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J)