1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER SB Cr Misc Bail Application No. 4850/2010 Vishal Goswami Versus The State of Rajasthan through PP 27.5.2010 HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Pradeep Mathur - for petitioner Mr Peeyush Kumar, PP – for the State BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that there exist allegations of ill treatment of mother of petitioner who died during course of treatment in the hospital where alleged incident said to have taken place. Looking to the aforesaid, petitioner may be granted bail. On the other hand, learned PP has opposed the bail application. After taking into consideration rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, but looking 2 to the facts of this case, I am inclined to allow this bail application under Section 438 CrPC. Therefore, the SHO/IO of the Police Station – Jawahar Nagar , District – Kota is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner/s Vishal Goswami in FIR No. 80/2010 registered for offence under Section/s 147, 323, 452 and 427 IPC, he shall enlarge him on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i)He shall make himself available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required; (ii)He shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; (iii)He shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (iv)He shall not commit same and similar offence during the period of bail. (MN Bhandari), J. bnsharma