IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN THURSDAY, THE 3RD FEBRUARY 2011 / 14TH MAGHA 1932 OP(C).No. 472 of 2011(O) ------------------------ (E.P.NO.97/2010 IN O.S.NO.82/2006 OF SUB COURT-II, THRISSUR) ------- PETITIONER -------------------- A.M.SUDHEER, S/O.A.R.MADHAVAN, AMMANATH HOUSE, THANGALLOOR P.O. THRISSUR - 680 581. BY ADV. SRI.C.HARIKUMAR RESPONDENT: --------------------- T.T.K.HEALTH CARE LTD., CHENNAI, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMERCIAL MANAGER, K.V.P.DAMODARAN, 57/3549, MANJU TOWERS, ERNAKULAM - 682 011. THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------ O.P(C).No.472 OF 2011 ------------------------------ Dated this the 3 rd day of February, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner is the judgment debtor in E.P.No.97 of 2010 on the file of the court of the Subordinate Judge of Thrissur. The decree was granted in favour of the respondent in a suit instituted by him before the City Civil Court, Madras. The decree was transferred to Thrissur for execution. E.P.No.381 of 2008 was filed earlier for realisation of the decree debt by arrest and detention of the judgment debtor in civil prison. The petitioner herein pleaded no means. It is stated that E.P.No.381 of 2008 was dismissed. Later, the present Execution Petition, namely, E.P.97 of 2010 was filed for realisation of the decree debt by attachment and sale of the immovable property belonging to the petitioner/judgment debtor. Notice under Rule 66 of Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure was issued to the petitioner and the case stands posted to 12.2.2011 for settlement of proclamation. 2. At this juncture, the petitioner has filed this O.P(C).No.472 OF 2011 2 Original Petition for the following reliefs: “i) a direction to the Hon'ble Subordinate Judges Court-II, Thrissur not to proceed with the sale of the property of the petitioner for enforcement of the ex parte decree in O.S.82 of 2006 of the City Civil Court, Chennai till the petitioner is given the opportunity to contest the ex parte decree. ii) such other relief that the court may grant in the interest of justice.” 3. The reliefs prayed for in the Original Petition cannot be granted. The Executing Court has not passed any order except issuing notice to the petitioner under Rule 66 of Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure. The prayer made by the petitioner indicates that he wants to file an application to set aside the ex parte decree. For that purpose, the Execution Proceedings cannot be stayed. For the aforesaid reasons, the Original Petition is dismissed. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE. cms