Crl. Revision No. 536 of 2011 -1- IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revision No. 536 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision :4.3.2011 Sukhwant Singh@ Sukha .......... petitioner Versus State of Punjab & another ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present : Mr. R.K.Girdhar, Advocate for the petitioner. **** RITU BAHRI, J. Challenge in this criminal revision is to the order dated 25.1.2011, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Ferozepur, whereby the application under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been dismissed. The complainant Sukhwant Singh @ Sukha / petitioner had deposed that Chamkaur Singh was also present at the spot at the time of occurrence. On preliminary investigation, he was put in column No. 2. Leaned Sessions Judge, while considering the application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. reference has been to two judgments i.e. one of this Court in the case of Gurmeet Kaur vs. State of Punjab and another, 2010(1) RCR (Criminal)195 and another of the Crl. Revision No. 536 of 2011 -2- Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sarajbit Singh and another Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2009(3) RCR (Criminal) 389, in which it has been held that to summon a person as an additional accused there should be an evidence, which would lead to the conviction of the petitioner sought to be summoned. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that role attributed to Chamkaur Singh was only “Lalkra”, this evidence is enough to lead conviction of Chamkaur Singh. Order of the learned Sessions Judge does not suffers from any infirmity as a “Lalkara” is not sufficient which could lead to conviction of Chamkaur Singh. It has also been observed in the order that on the date of occurrence he was away to Rajasthan in connection with election. Criminal revision is dismissed. 4.3.2011 (RITU BAHRI) 'sp' JUDGE