IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI CONTEMPT CASE No. 1487 OF 2009 Between: K.Somraj ..... PETITIONER AND Sri A.D.Wilson, The Assistant Director of Veterinary Section, Central Zone,Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad and another .... RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI CONTEMPT CASE No. 1487 OF 2009 O R D E R: This contempt case is filed alleging violation of the order dated 20.08.2009 in W.P.No.6896 of 2009, which was disposed of with the following directions: “ However, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the Commissioner of Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation to consider the application made by the petitioner for grant of licence under Section 521 of HMC Act, 1955 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order. The petitioner is also granted liberty to make an appropriate application for grant of licence under Section 539 of the HMC Act, if not already made, within one week from the date of receipt of this order. If any such application is made, the Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, shall receive and consider the same in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders within two weeks from the date of receipt of the said application.” In response to the notice ordered, a counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents stating that in terms of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.6896 of 2009, the petitioner’s application was considered and his request was rejected by order dated 08.10.2009. It is also stated that the said order was communicated to the petitioner by post. In the circumstances, no further enquiry is necessary and accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed, granting leave and liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 08.10.2009 by working out the appropriate remedy as available under law, if so advised. No costs. ____________ Date: 08.04.2010 G. ROHINI, J Ivd