1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.47 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2459 OF 2008 Shri Dinesh Chinubhai Vandra. ..Petitioner V/s. Mr.Subhash Hajare, having charge of MHADA & ors. ..Respondents. Mr.S.A.Sawant for petitioner. Mr.V.M.Parashurami for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J A.M.KHANWILKAR,J A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE DATE DATE : APRIL 29, 2009. : APRIL 29, 2009. : APRIL 29, 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. Reply affidavit tendered across the bar be filed in the Registry in the course of the day. As per the said affidavit, it appears that the case of the Petitioner was considered by the Master List Committee on 27th January, 2009. It has been found that the Petitioner would be eligible for alternate suitable premises in the same building, which is to be reconstructed on the suit site. The Committee has not accepted the request of the Petitioner for allotting another premises in the category of Master List Allottees in the fact situation of the present case. It is fairly accepted that the decision taken 2 by the Master List Committee has not been communicated to the Petitioner so far. That is due to inadvertence. 3. Taking over all view of the matter, this is not a case to initiate contempt action, except to direct the Respondents to communicate the decision of the Master List Committee to the Petitioner within one week from today. It will be open to the Petitioner to question the correctness of the said decision or for any other further relief by way of appropriate proceedings, if so advised. All questions in that behalf are left open. 4. Petition disposed of on the above terms. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J)