1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1438 OF 2010 (Mrs. Ashita N. Thorat vs. Presiding Officer, School Tribunal & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. JUNE 15, 2010. Heard Shri Borkar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mrs. Wasnik, learned AGP for respondent No.1, Shri Masood Shareef for respondent No. 3 and Shri Issac, learned counsel for respondent No. 4. On the last occasion, the matter was adjourned to enable Respondent No. 3 to make a statement about time, within which the permanent arrangement to fill in the post of Head Mistress can be made. Today, Shri Shareef, learned counsel, upon instructions, states that it will take minimum four to five months. He further states that because of material with management against the petitioner, the management may not consider her claim for that post. Shri Borkar, learned counsel points out that there was no departmental enquiry against the petitioner and alleged material with the management has not been disclosed. He, therefore, contends that the management is duty bound to consider the entitlement of the petitioner in accordance with law as, and when the 2 permanent arrangement is sought to be made. However, during arguments, it has come to the notice of this Court that appeal filed by the petitioner before the School Tribunal is itself fixed for final hearing on 23rd June 2010. The counsel jointly state that the appeal itself can be disposed of finally. Hence, instead of going into any controversy about filling in the post on permanent basis at this stage, I feel that interest of justice can be satisfied by directing Respondent No. 1 to decide the appeal as early as possible and in any case by 15th July 2010. With these directions to the School Tribunal, present writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.