CRM-M-14191 of 2011 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CRM-M-14191 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.10.2011 Sheela Devi and others ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ....Respondent. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain Present: Mr. Sandeep S. Majithia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.D. Sachdeva, Addl. A.G., Punjab ... Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.(Oral) One Girdhari Lal was the owner of the property, which is subject matter of dispute between the brothers and sisters. Girdhari Lal had left behind three daughters and four sons. According to the learned counsel, as per Will (Annexure P-3), he gave one house to all the four sons and one house at Kapurthala to Paramjit (petitioner No.4). In the present case, the application for bail has been filed by the three daughters and 4th son Paramjit, who are facing allegation that they have usurped the property left behind by Girdhari Lal in which complainant had also a share. Learned counsel submits that it is purely a civil dispute and the petitioners have already joined investigation. CRM-M-14191 of 2011 2 Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Satnam Singh has stated that the petitioners have joined investigation. In view of above, order dated 10.05.2011 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions already contained therein. Petition is disposed of. ( Rakesh Kumar Jain ) Judge 13.10.2011 sk.