IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH JUNE 2007 / 23RD JYAISHTA 1929 Bail Appl..No. 3535 of 2007() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.50/2000 OF ALAPPUZHA SOUTH POLICE STATION PETITIONER/ACCUSED: ------------------------------------ FR.VIJAY ISSAC, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. ISSAC, PARIS PRIEST, ST. ANTONY'S CHURCH, PERUNNERMANGALAM, CHETHI P.O., CHENNAVELI, CHERTHALA. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRIYADARSAN THAMPI RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT: ------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTING SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALAPPUZHA SOUTH POLICE STATION, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.JAI GEORGE THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.RAMKUMAR, J ----------------------------------------- B.A.NO. 3535 of 2007 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of June, 2007 ORDER The petitioner who claims himself to be a parish priest seeks anticipatory bail on the allegation that he is said to be arrested in connection with Crime No.50/2000 of Alappuzha South Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. 2. In fact the petitioner had filed an application for anticipatory bail before the Sessions Court, Alappuzha as Crl.M.P.No.430/2000 and as per Order dated 14.3.2000 (Annexure A1 order) he was granted anticipatory bail obliging the police to grant bail in the event of the arrest of the petitioner in the above crime. The said order is still operative. In case the petitioner is arrested in that crime, he is entitled to be released on bail in terms of that bail. I see no reason as to why the petitioner has filed this petition again for anticipatory bail.This petition is, accordingly, dismissed as unnecessary. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE css/ B.A.No. :2: B.A.No. :3: