... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.8110 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.8110 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.8110 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3560 OF 2005 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri D.K.Ghaisas for the Applicant. Shri S.V.More, A.P.P for the State. Shri Harshad Palwe for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 15, 2006. DATE : NOVEMBER 15, 2006. DATE : NOVEMBER 15, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocates appearing for the parties. In view of the fact that a Revision Application was preferred by the Applicant for challenging the order of acquittal, delay has been caused in filing Application for leave to prefer an Appeal. Sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (i) and (ii). Keep the Application for leave for admission on 19th December, 2006. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE