THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.14489 of 2010 Date: 25.6.2010 Between: M.S.Alfred, Postnett Memorial Church, Medchal, Ranga Reddy District and others. ………...Petitioners And The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Commissionerate, Gachi Bowli, R.R.District and others. …… Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.14489 of 2010 ORDER: This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners, who are three in number, assailing the in action of the respondents in registering a case on the basis of the complaints filed by them on 14.1.2009, 15.4.2010, 20.5.2010 and 4.6.2010. The 1st petitioner claims to be Pastorate Steward of C.S.I Postnett Memorial Church at Medchal. According to the petitioners, C.S.I Churh owned 286 square yards in Sy.No.110, situated at APHB, C.S.I Church Road, Medchal. The petitioners filed O.S.No.221 of 2007 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Medchal against Rev.B.P.Sugender, Rev.Ch.Anthony and K.Krupanandam and obtained an interim injunction restraining them not to alienate the properties by an order dated 26.4.2007 in I.A.No.728 of 2007. The interim order came to be modified on 28.6.2007. Despite the interim order, the property came to be disposed by the defendants in favour of third parties. The purchasers filed a suit being O.S.No.54 of 2010 and also moved I.A.No.251 of 2010 and secured an order of statusquo. The petitioners filed representations before the respondents to take necessary action against the persons, who demolished the Church pending the matter in Civil Court. There being no action on the representations, they approached this Court invoking the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. When the writ petition came up for admission, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home takes notice on behalf of the respondents. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents and perused the material brought on record. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the property came to be demolished during the vacation period and it made the petitioners to lodge a complaint before the police. A further submission has been made that the respondents have not taken any action despite complaint being presented before them, and, therefore, necessary direction is required to be given to the respondents to consider the representation and take appropriate action. As seen from the material placed on record, there are two suits pending in respect of 286 square yards in Sy.No.110 at APHB, C.S.I Church Road, Medchal. One suit is filed by the petitioner and another suit is filed by the purchasers. In the suit filed by the purchasers, the Civil Court granted an order of status-quo, whereas in the suit filed by the petitioners, the Civil Court granted interim direction to the defendants not to alienate the property. Since the Civil Court seized of the matter, it is not for the respondents to adjudicate the civil disputes among the parties on the basis of the representations submitted by the petitioners. In the given facts and circumstances, invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is wholly misconceived. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. ______________________________________ JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY Date:25.6.2010 Note: Furnish CC within three days. B/O mrb