IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.591 of 2011 Sanjay Sahni, Son of Chhathu Sahni, resident of Village-Rahua, Paschmi Tole Khanpur, P.S. Waris Nagar, District- Samastipur..........................Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR...............Opposite party. ----------- 2. 02.02.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in connection with Warisnagar P.S. Case No. 141 of 2008 registered under Section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the marriage took place more than seven years prior to incident. Hence, the case does not come within the purview of Section 304B of the I.P.C. It is further submitted that demand of money was with regard to treatment of the victim hence, it can not treated as dowry demand. It is also submitted that the informant has retracted from his initial version and appropriate petition has been field before the learned court below and considering the same, the father-in-law has been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 10378 of 2010 on 20.04.2010. In my view the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner are good 2 grounds for grant of regular bail. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner considering the aforesaid submissions and try to dispose off the application on the same day. With the aforesaid observation, this application is disposed off. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)