IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20898 of 2009 1. SAHDEO YADAV,SON OF DHANI YADAV 2. DHANI YADAV,SON OF BIFAN YADAV 3. SURYADEO SINGH, SON OF LATE JAGESHWAR SINGH 4. AWADHESH SINGH, SON OF SURYADEO SINGH ALL RESINDENT OF VILLAGE GHORAWADIH, P.S. DOBHI, DISTRICT-GAYA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 23.7.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Counsel for the State. Submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioners is that petitioners are bonafide purchasers and owners of the land. They harvested the crop in their own capacity that is why informant and members of his party was ignored. To make the offence serious false allegation regarding abuse in name of informant’s caste is asserted but one of the members who was accompanying the informant while he was protesting harvesting is not stating any abuse in name of informant’s caste rather there is clear mentioned that claim was made on behalf of the petitioners regarding their being occupants of the land even then petitioners are apprehending their arrest which in my view is not justified. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order on - 2 - furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.K.Singh, Judicial Magistrate, IInd Class, Sherghati at Gaya in Complaint case No. 162 of 2009 (Trial No. 170 of 2009), subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Mandhata Singh,J.) A.Kumar