IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43854 of 2010 1. Shailesh kumar son of Jagarnath Rai, resident of Lakhan Tola, P.S. Bihta, District Patna. 2. Chandeshwar Rai, son of Rambalak Rai, Resident of Village Raipur, P.S. Naubatpur, District Patna…………….Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar ……………………….Opposite Party ----------- 2 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel for the State. Case is under sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the first information report of informant, her one son, by getting the informant impersonated by another lady sold 10 kathas of land and got it registered in favour of three purchasers. Petitioners are said to be identifiers on the sale deeds. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are driver and Khalasi of the vehicles and on the request of the said son of the informant, they had identified that the lady was his mother. It is also stated in paragraph 15 of the application that 2 three purchasers have been allowed anticipatory bail by the learned Sessions Judge, Patna in A.B.P. No. 1052 of 2010 by order dated 14.05.2010. In the circumstances, this application is disposed of with a direction to petitioners to appear before the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No.3/2010 within four weeks from today and apply for regular bail. The court below shall ascertain as to whether the purchasers of the sale deeds have been allowed anticipatory bail by the learned Sessions Judge or not and if the court finds that the said statement made on behalf of petitioners is correct, it will allow bail to petitioners, namely, Shailesh Kumar and Chandeshwar Rai, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to its satisfaction. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)