IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.51648 of 2008 GUDDU @ IMTIYAZ ALAM @ IMTEYAZ Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 04.02.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This is an application for modification of order dated 17.07.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 25440 of 2008. There in spite of specific direction, the Railway Judicial Magistrate, Gaya did not accept grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner for the reason that a direction was also there to make inquiry regarding criminal antecedent of the petitioner. Because the petitioner appeared in between the time for inquiry and acceptance of bail bond there should have been a provisional order passed by the court instead of waiting for the inquiry report relating to antecedent of petitioner. The Judicial Magistrate, Gaya is directed to accept the bail bond of the petitioner in case of his surrender within three weeks from today. Let the order be communicated through fax to the court concerned at the cost deposited by the petitioner. Vikash/- (Mridula Mishra, J.)