;ln(g?3 Sench 3 IN THE HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT_PETITION N0. 2-13 /2004' PETITIONER ^ Satish Kumar Soi, son of late Parmanand Soi, aged about 24 years, resident of village - Pithora, Distt. Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RESPONDENTS / 1. o > .-"' \ u. ..^ ^....•c<^ ^••"\y ^^ 2. The Union of India, through : the Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pension (State Reorganization Cell), III Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi. State of Chhattisgarh, through : the Secretary, Department of Water Resources, Mantralay, Raipur (CG) State of Madhya Pradesh, through : Secretary, Department of Water Resources, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopai (Madhya Pradesh) The Executive Engineer-, Department of Water Resources, Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE ORDER II j2^%®H^ »^vassr^.^i' >'~J] ^w- ..As^i l^^p s-s^sa. v^ ^I ^ n-' ^ ^ ^^ •^''..^'.-;-1' ^^vy -^"^^ ^ f7 ^y' ^y-' H!GJ1COURTOF_JUDICATURECHHATTISGARH:B1LASPUR Single Bench Hon'bleShri Satish K.Agnihotri, J. Petitioner Respondents Satish Kumar Soi Versus The Union of india and others. Shri Vinay Pandey, counsei for the petifioner. Smt. B. Maity, Advocafe on behaifof Shri S.K. Beriwal.counsei for respondentNo.l/Unionoflndia Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer, for the State/ respondents No.2 and4. ' QRDER (Passedon 10<h Day ofJanuary, 2( The father of the petitioner namely Parmanand Soi, while working as Toil Keeper-in W.R.S. Division No.1, Pithaura, Distt. Mahasamund, dted in harness on 17.07.1999. The petitioner being the son i.e. dependant legai heir made an appljcation. The application of the petitioner was rejeeted by impugned orderdated 01.10.2003. (2) The Government of Chhattisgarh, by its circuiar dated 02.02.2006 has directed a!t the departments •to'consider cases of ali the eiigible dependant legal heirsof the deceased emptoyees, who died in harness between 01.11.1997 to 31.10.2000 for compassionate appointment. (3) Accordingly, the Government of Chhattisgarh is directed to consider the case of the petitioner as per its own cireular dated 02.02.2006 and also in view ofthe order passed by this Court in W.P. No.3879/2004 and other connected matterson !ts own merit, in accordancewith law, withina period of eightweeks, on such representation beingfiled by the petitioner. '-^ (4) For the reasons stated above, the writ petition is disposed of. No orderastoeosts. Sd/- , :./ , Y^ —SatishK.Agnihotri 'J.':',Judge, : ' ';