IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 6429 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 6429 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 6429 OF 2008. Sontakke Sanjay Vishwanath ..Petitioner. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors ..Respondents. Mr P. M. Huddar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr V. A. Sonpal, A.G.P. for the Respondent No.1-State. CORAM: V. C. DAGA, J. CORAM: V. C. DAGA, J. CORAM: V. C. DAGA, J. DATED: 16.09. 2008. DATED: 16.09. 2008. DATED: 16.09. 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner. Perused the petition. This petition is directed against the order dated 28.8.,2008, whereby representation of the petitioner came to be decided. 2. The factual matrix reveal that the show cause notice date 25.1.2008 has been issued to the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that before the Inquiry Officer representation was made contending that the petitioner being employee of the Society does not fall within the scope of Section 88 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Socieites Act, 1960 (M.C.S.Act) as such no show cause notice could have been issued and no inquiry could be allowed to be proceeded with against him. Consequently, he preferred revision which, ultimately, came to be rejected. This order is the subject matter of challenge in this petition as stated hereinabove. 3. At this stage, it is not necesary to go into the question as to whether the petitioner is within the sweep of Section 88 of the M.C.S.Act. Today, what has been done by the Enquiry Officer is nothing but rejected preliminary objection raised by the Petitioner. 4. At this stage, it is not necessary to entertain this petition. However, if, the ultimate final order is against the petitioner, if any responsibility is fixed on him giving rise to any liability against him, then, it would be open to the petitioner to challenge the said final order, Accordingly, the petition, at this stage, is dismissed in limini keeping all rival contentions ( 3 ) open for being raised at the appropriate stage. No order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)