IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO. 625 OF 2006 NO. 625 OF 2006 NO. 625 OF 2006 IN IN IN CHAMBER CHAMBER CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 813 OF 2006 SUMMONS NO. 813 OF 2006 SUMMONS NO. 813 OF 2006 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 3366 OF 2005 NO. 3366 OF 2005 NO. 3366 OF 2005 1. Stanislaus Joseph Creado & 3 ors. ] .. Appellants (Ori.Plaintiffs) Versus 1. Gerard D’Mello & 9 ors. ] .. Respondents (Ori.Defendants) Mr. Rohit Kapadia, senior counsel with Mr. K.B. Purohit i/b M/s. Purohit & Purohit for the appellants. Mr. V.B. Dhavan for the respondent No.1. CORAM: R.M. LODHA & S.A. BOBDE, JJ. DATED: 19TH SEPTEMBER, 2006 P.C. : . The senior counsel for the appellants and the counsel for the first respondent handed in Minutes of the Order marked "A" for identification purposes along with the Consent Terms/Decree marked "X". 2. We perused the Consent Terms and, in our view, the said Consent Terms subserve the ends of justice and, accordingly, we are satisfied that Appeal may be disposed of in terms of the Minutes handed in. : 2 : 3. We, accordingly, dispose of the Appeal in terms of the Minutes of the Order ("A") handed in today. The undertaking of the appellants and the first respondent contained in the Consent Terms are accepted. . Order accordingly. Sd/- [R.M. [R.M. [R.M. LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] Sd/- [S.A. [S.A. [S.A. BOBDE, J.] BOBDE, J.] BOBDE, J.]