IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35364 of 2009 GYAN RANJAN KUMAR, son of Sri Baliram Pd. Singh, village Dhimoi, P.S. Harnau, District Nalanda Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.10.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. Mr. Ramakant Sharma, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, submits that the allegation against the petitioner of being employed, working and continuing in Government service in the Industries Department either in Bhagalpur office or in head office at Patna on the basis of forged transfer order could not and as a matter of fact did not enure to the benefit of the petitioner and resultant loss to the Government exchequer inasmuch no payment by way of salary was made to the petitioner at any point of time. He has also submitted that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 25.4.2009. Considering the aforementioned aspects and specially the fact that such employment and continuance of the petitioner on fake/ forged orders could not have been 2 possible without collusion of the other Officers and employees of Industries Department both at Bhagalpur and Patna and the petitioner was not paid any amount of salary, this Court would direct for release of the abovenamed petitioner on bail on or after 25.10.2009 when he would complete his judicial custody for a period of six months on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in Sachivalaya P.S.Case No. 63/2008, subject to the condition that one of the bailors would be either of his parents and that the petitioner shall without fail remain present in course of trial (when required) and failure to do so would automatically entail the consequence of cancellation of his bail under the present order in this case. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/