IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34661 of 2009 RAM BHUSHAN SINGH & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.7.2010 After having heard Shri Ram Sumiran Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Binod Kuimar No.2, learned A.P.P. for the State and having considered the impugned order in the light of the provision of Section 468 Cr. P.C. the Court is inclined to take a view that the order was intervened by the period of limitation as set down by Section 468 Cr. P.C. The date of occurrence being 19.3.1997 and the order being passed on 6.2.2009, that order could never be justified as within the time on account of the provision cited above. As such, the order dated 6.2.2009 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in Barauni P.S.Case No. 106 of 1997, G.R. No. 630 of 1997 is hereby quashed. However, The Court feels that the matter should go back to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai so that he may consider hearing the petitioners on the issue of limitation and take a view in the light of the provision of Section 468 Cr. P.C. The petition is allowed. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)