WP(C) 6322/2006 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.MADAN B.LOKUR HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.K.MUSAHARY This matter was taken up on the basis of a complaint to the effect that Responde nt Nos. 7 and 8 had illegally constructed the 7th and 8th floor of a building na med as Shopper’s Point at Fancy Bazar. It appears that on 14.6.2007, the Commissioner of Gauhati Munici pal Corporation (GMC) passed an order to the effect, inter alia, that the constr uction of 7th and 8th floors of the said building known as Shopper’s Point in Fancy Bazar are unauthorized and hence liable to be demolished. An appeal against the order is contemplated under Section 438 of the Gauhati Municipal Corporation Act, 1971 and it appears that Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 preferred an appeal before the Standing Committee of the GMC. On 19.5.2010, the Administrator of the GMC passed an order on th e appeal since the Standing Committee had been dissolved. A copy of the order pa ssed by the Administrator, GMC has been placed before us in terms of our orders dated 25.3.2010 and 6.5.2010. Learned Standing Counsel, GMC says that the orders dated 14.6.2007 and 1 9.5.2010 have been challenged by the petitioner by filing a writ petition i.e. W P(C) No. 3488/2010 which is pending before a learned Single Judge. Learned counsel for Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 says that the writ petiti on is limited only to the construction on the ground floor to 6th floor of the b uilding. The 7th and other subsequent floors are not the subject matter of the w rit petition. A copy of the order dated 28.6.2010 passed by the learned single J udge has been shown to us in this regard but there is no mention in the said ord er with regard to the submission now made by learned counsel for Respondent N os. 6 and 7. Since the prayer in the writ petition being WP(C) No. 3488/2010 is for s etting aside the order dated 19.5.2010, we do not think it appropriate to limit the relief in the writ petition only to issues raised with respect to ground fl oor to 6th floor. As far as we are concerned, the entire order dated 19.5.2010 is under challenge before the learned single Judge. In view of the above, no useful purpose will be served by continuing w ith this writ petition which, in any case, is a taken up matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. The misc. application No. 2491/2010 also stands disposed of.