1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.231/2010. (Shivsing Gautam and anr. Vs. Sanjay Chajed and Anr.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.US Usmanpurkar, Adv. for petitioners; Mr.RG Joshi, ADv. for Resp.Nos. 1 and 2. *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 25 th October, 2010. ... 1) Heard. 2) Clubbing of two suits by the learned Judge is questioned in the writ. 3) Having gone through the observations of the learned Judge, and particularly the last paragraph of the observation, I find there was no illegality committed by him, as the controversy in respect of land Gut No.89 and Gut No.90, being subject of two suits between identical parties, would necessarily be resolved and the time spent would be minimized. 4) Writ Petition lacks merit, dismissed. No costs. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/