1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application No.6663 of 2007 In Letters Patent Appeal Stamp No.10528 of 2007 In Writ Petition No.733 of 2006 (Decided) (Trimbak s/o Mallappa Kurhe and others v. Ratnaprabha wd/o Vishwanath Choudhari and others) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Shri P.S. Patil, Advocate for Applicants/Appellants. CORAM : K.J. Rohee & R.C. Chavan, JJ. DATE : 10th December, 2007 Civil Application No.6663 of 2007 : Heard the learned counsel for the applicants/appellants. None appears for the respondents, though served. The impugned judgment was passed on 28-2-2007 allowing the amendment in the decree after 21 years of its passing. The appellants received conflicting advice from their lawyers and that is why they could not file the appeal within time. The appeal has been filed on 3-7-2007. Thus, there has been delay of 95 days. Receiving conflicting advice appears to be sufficient ground for condoning the delay. The delay in the filing the appeal is, therefore, condoned. The civil application is disposed of. 2 Letters Patent Appeal Stamp No.10528 of 2007 : Issue notice of the Letters Patent Appeal to the respondents, returnable after four weeks. JUDGE JUDGE pdl