IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 5TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 16TH MAGHA 1930 SA.No. 202 of 1997(G) AS.51/1990 of SUB COURT, HOSDRUG OS.64/1987 of MUNSIFF COURT, HOSDRUG .................... APPELLANT/2ND RESPONDENT/2ND DEFENDANT:- KANNOTH CHANDRAN, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. KRISHNAN & NARAYANI, HINDU, RESIDING AT RAMANAGAR IN AJANOOR VILLAGE OF HOSDURG TALU, POST ANANDASHRAM. BY ADV. MR.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENTS/APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFFS/1ST DEFENDANT:- 1. CHEYYOM VALAPPIL GOPALAN, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O. CHIRTHA, HINDU, RESIDING AT KOZHUNTHIL IN NILESWAR VILLAGE OF HOSDURG TALUK, POST NILESWER. 2. P. NARAYANAN, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O. RAMAN PANICKER, HINDU, CULTIVATOR, RESIDING AT NELENKARA IN KANHANGAD VILLAGE, OF HOSDURG TALUK, POST KANHANGAD SOUTH. MR.S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER, SENIOR ADVOCATE ADV. MS.M.M.TEENA THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT IN VIEW OF THE DISMISSAL OF C.M.P. 562/97, THIS SECOND APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 05.02.2009 sd/- V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. V. RAMKUMAR , J. ========================== R.S.A. No. 202 of 1997 ========================== Dated this the 5th day of February, 2009. JUDGMENT Even though sufficient opportunities have been given to the appellant to take out notice to the 2nd respondent, no steps have been taken so far. Even when the case came up today in the disposal list, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. The Second Appeal is accordingly dismissed for default. Dated this the 5th day of February, 2009. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. rv V. RAMKUMAR, J ------------------------------------ S.A. No. 202 of 1997 ---------------------------------------- 5th day of February, 2009. JUDGMENT