^' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ petition FC1 No ^6^5/20 11 & PETITIONER RESPONDENTS \,-^ ,\y..^>:y/ ^ \.--''\h.y''' ...< 1;<''<1'.«V>"'...-"^ ls'.--y..-:;"^ ^/•"^" x^ 1- ^ 2- ,^:.-<-v Gulaba Bai W/o Santosh, aged about 50 years, R/o Plot No. 393/1 Vindhyawasini Ward No. 15 Kawardha. Distt-Kabirdham. (CG). Versus State of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Kawardha District - Kabirdham. (CG) Municipal Council Kawardha through The Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Council Kawardha , Distt-Kabirdham. (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE COJiTSTITUTION OF INDIA. ^ HTGH COlJRT OF CHHATTISOARH AT BTT -A8PI JR PETmONER WRIT PETmON (QNo. 5675 of2011 GulabaBai. RESPONDENT8 VRR8TJ8 Sto-te ofChhattisgarh & Another, WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmjnON OF INDIA SB: Hon'We Shri Satish K. Aenihotri,J. Pre^ent: Shri A.shok Vaishnav, Advocate tbr the petitioner. SM Shashaxik Thakw, Patiel Lawyer fortlie State/responde$it No. 1. Shri Anm 8ao, Advocate forthe respondcBt No. 2. ORDRR (Passed on 26t&4ay ofS^tember, 2011) 1, At the very oirtset Shri Sao. teamed couosel apparing for the respondent No, 2, on mstniction, siibmits that no demolition in respect of the property m dispute shall take place withoirt following the di»@ process of !aw and without affordmg an opportumty ofhearing to the petitioiier^ 2. In vkw ofthe above submissioiL acGordmg to leamed coimsel for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication m this matter at this stage 3. Accordingly^ the wdi petition is disposed of witii the aforestated observation. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Atttit