HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH XT BlASPUf^ DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON?BLE SHRI RA^IEVGUPTA, CJ. HON'BLESHRIRANGNATHCHANDRAKAR,J ADpellants \JB'- } Respondents M.A.C.No.749 of 2010 1 Daymati, w^ late Banshl Yadav, aged about 38 years, r/o Bastar, Tahsil -Jagdalpur, Distt Bastar, (CG) 2 Basant Kumar, s/o late Banshi Yadav, aged about 24 years, r/o B^tar, TahsiS - Jagdalpvr, Distt Bastar, (CG) 3 Sukhchand, s/o late Banshi Yadav, aged about 16 years, r/©Bastar, Tahsil - Jagdalpur, Distt Bastar, (CG) Minor through natural guardigui motter Smt Daymati, appeHant No.1. Versus 1 Bhajjjram @ Bhajram Jena, s/o Sirnath Jena, Occupatton - Driver, BeMnd Atithi Lodge, Jagdalpur, Oistt Bastar (CG) (Vehtole Driver) 2 Jitendra Singh Tomar, s/o K^hav Singh Tomar, r/o Shantinagar ward, Jagdalpur, Distt Bastar (CG) (Vehicle Owner) 3 Branch Manager, Nationat tnsuianee Company Umited, Upper of the Central Bank Jagdalpur, Distt Bastar (C©) (Insurance Company) IVIiscellaneous Appeal under Section 173 of IVIotor Vehicle Act Present : None for the appellants. Shri Goutam Khetrapal, coun^l for respondent Mo.3. <C(N«—»»UN.<11*1»1 !X^ M.A.C.No.749 of2010 ORDER >th (28m February, 2012) The following order-of the Codrt was passed by RajeevGupta, C.J. None for the appellants. 2) As there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, we are left wlth no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of pros^?uti@n. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge padma