IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2372 of 2007 SHAMBHU NATH PRASAD, SON OF BAIJNATH SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – LODHI BAZAR, POLICE STATION, GORIA KOTHI, DISTRICT – SIWAN. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. SRI ANJANI KUMAR SINGH, THE COMMISSIONER CUM- SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF SECONDARY, PRIMARY AND ADULT EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. SRI SANTOSH KUMAR MALL, THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SIWAN. 4. SRI BINOD KUMAR, THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, SIWAN. 5. SRI RABINDRA NATH, THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, GORIA KOTHI, DISTRICT SIWAN. 6. SRI SUBODH KUMAR TIWARI, THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ SARARI, NORTH, DISTRICT – SIWAN. 7. RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA, SON OF SRI BISHESHWAR GUPTA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – LODHI, POST OFFICE – SARARI, POLICE STATION – GORIA KOTHI, DISTRICT – SIWAN. ----------- 09. 19.11.2009 Heard the parties. Today, a supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner after serving a copy to the other side. A show cause has been filed on behalf of the Opposite Party No. 4 after serving a copy to the petitioner today in court. It is submitted on behalf of the State, that on perusal of the order contained in Memo No. 281 dated 04.03.2008, as contained in Annexure- A to the show cause, it would appear that in compliance of the order of this court, the appropriate order has been passed by the District Magistrate, Siwan, and as such, this contempt application need not proceed further. Learned counsel for the petitioner in reply to the show cause submits that the authority while considering the case of selection of Shiksha Mitra, committed serious irregularity as the persons having lesser marks, have been appointed but the persons having higher marks have not been appointed. However, petitioner submits that since the order contained in Annexure – A is not correct, he prays to assail the same before the appropriate authority. Considering the above, this contempt application is disposed of. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)