IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 21 of 2010 Date of decision: 12.01.2010 Shiv Lal ........ petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Kulbir Dalal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab for the respondent -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) In pursuance to the order dated 04.01.2010, a Warrant Officer was appointed. The Warrant Officer has filed his report dated 07.01.2010. As per his report, the detenues were not in any way found to be in illegal confinement of respondent No. 4. Thereafter, the petitioner along with his men numbering 14 were allowed to go wherever they wished without any obstruction from the owner. In view of the same, the writ petition is rendered as infructuous. Dismissed as such. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge January 12, 2010 mohan