SNGLE BENcH ,,;e 1/ 5; 5/ i x IN THEHEGH€0URT OFCHHATTISGARHATBILASPUR (CG) ’ W. P. gSQ N0.&OZ3/2010 {/7 Through-Secretary Panchayat and Rural Development Dept. D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2. ChiefExecutive Officer Jila Panchayat Distt Kerba (C G) WRH‘ PETETIGN UNDER ARIE§IES 226 OF WE CONSTETUHON OF ENDIA I , PETITIONER Tijram Sahu S/o Shri Manbodh Sahu j/(B‘yxQ NJ? ..... age about 33 years V1Ilage Tohlradlh ~ PostfJaJang, Saktl, Dlstt. Ralgarh (C.G.) VERSU$ ‘ / I REPONDENTS La State of CG. 3am, m, mm m 39%) anémw (Wu) Wt 200 . mmm WW‘§%¢T€W §wimanéw SB : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan $hrivastava, J. 02-08-2010 Shri S. P. Kale, counsel forthe Detitioner. Smt‘ Sangeeta Mishra, Panel No.1 on advance copy. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitior‘ has med a writ petition (WP.(S)N0.28 iiberty to make representatian, Then representation before the responderr that he is entitled to be considered for reguiarization framed by the governi been considered. Without commenting upon the the petitioner has not made represent the respondent N042. Under these circumstances, giving liberty to the petitioner to respondent No.2. in the event, such one month from today, the responde same in accordance with law, within date of receipt of the representation. Sd/— l Lawyer for the Stateirespondent er submits that earlier the petitioner 36/2009), which was withdrawn with aafter, the petitioner has preferred , authority on 07-08—2009 oiaiming reguiarization under the scheme of nent. However, the same has not merits of the case, it is found that ation to the appointing authority Le, :his petition is finally disposed of make representation before the a representation is» preferred within No.2 shall consider and decide the outer limit of four months from the mi». it -\ ti r Manindra Mohan Shrivastava r Judge - ,, Tumane some aim: wrath imzzer'ra é is. met/2010 #1 ,oo,ooo. g4