IGH CGUR? OF CHHATTlSGARi-l AT BILASPHR WRIT PETITieN {SQ No. 1627 of 2009 PETITIGNER : smt. Sarajani Sahu Age about 50 year, Assft. Teacher W/o Shri Radheshyam Sahu, Gavt. Boys Primaty Schooi, Abhanpur, Block Abhanpur, Distt. — Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS REsPONDENT : L. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Wrough : The Secretary, Educatien Depariment, D;K.S. Shawan, Raipur (C.G.) " 2f. The Distt. Educatien Off§cer Raipur, Distt. Raipur (6.6.) 3. Biock Educatian Officer, Abhanpur, watt. Raipur Km.) , 4. Treasury, Accaunt andPemion Raipur, Disti. - Ra§pur (C.G.) . WRIT PETmGN UNDER ARTmLE 226 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF iNDiA , EB: Hnn’bie Shri Satigh K. Agnihem, J. Pregem: Shri Samkaht Verma, Advecate f0? the petitkmer. Shri Arun Sao, Gavemment Advocate f9? the State/respandents. I. ORAL ORBER (Pa5sed era 2?”?! day of March, 2009) \7\‘\» v With the cansant of the parties, the matter is heard finaily. I)”. The petiticmer was appointed as Assistan: Teachers on a fixed pay o? Rs. 150/-. After compietien of her prebaiien period, she was granted reguiar pay scaie. f9 Learned counsei agg’earingjer fhe eetitioner submits that the issue Tavelved in the case is asie whether, the petitiener is entities! t0 regular pay scale w.e.f. the date iniiial appeintmeh’i er after compie‘tion OT proba‘ziOn period. . The iesue involved, herein was nensidered by the Madhya Pradesh state Administrative iribunai, Jabaipur in 0A. No, 2i45/ee (Maehukent Yadu and 56 ethers Ve;\$iate oi MP. ai oihere), wherein i: \ was heici that the simiiariy situated teachere are entitied to regular pay H S $caie w.e.f. the date cf initial appointment. The matter wag taken ue ta Hon'me Supreme Ccurt in Special Leave Petitien (Civi!} No. 6892/93. The said petition was dismiSSed by the Han’ble Supreme 0mm uphogding the decisicm of the Ttibunai to the effect that the Teachers/Aseistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scaie fram date of in§t%a! appointmeht. I . Leamed counse: appearing for the petitioner also submits that this caurt, whiie considering the same issue in Amar Sai Ram & others Vs‘ state m ohhattisgarh s others {WE (3) Ne. 4725/2906] by gander dated 01.09.2006, aliowed the petitieners to make a representation aicng with copy 0f the petition and annexures Within a period a? ten days, raising ail their grietrances and in turn the cancemed respondent was directed to decide the regresentation in an objective manner within a goeriod 0f 30 days from the date of receipt of the representation. .V Abcorciingiy, the petitioner is granted iiherty to make a representation raising aii he? grievances and in turn, t'ne concerned resptmdent is directed to decide the renresentation, if any, in accordance with law, on its oWn merits, wiwn n period ot 8 weeks from the date oi receipt of the representation. . in new 0i the foregeing, tnie netitien is disposed of. tie order aster C0$f5. r Sd/- f1 Satish K. Agnihotrif 11 K v Judge ix Agni: