IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13287 of 2008 Meera Kumari, Daughter of Sri Madan Das, resident of Bank of India Colony, Sheikhpura, P.S. Shashtri Nagar, District Patna…………………….Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Commissioner and Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Bihar, Patna. 2. District Magistrate, Nawada. 3. District Superintendent of Education, Nawada. 4. Block Development Officer, Narhat Block, District Nawada. 5. Block Education Extension Officer, Narhat, District Nawada. 6. Mukhiya, Village Panchayat Babhnaur, Post Hasanpur, P.S. Narhat, District Nawada. 7. Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Babhnaur, Post Hasanpur, P.S. Narhat, District Nawada……………………………………………………………………………Respondents ------------- 3 16.11.2011 By filing a supplementary affidavit it is stated that earlier order of the Block Development Officer cancelling appointment of the petitioner as Panchayat Teacher was not acted upon and petitioner continued and later on, the order itself was withdrawn by the B.D.O. himself. Against that, the complainant filed an appeal before the Appellate Authority which has been dismissed. Hence it is stated that petitioner continued in service and her appointment has been given a seal of approval by the Appellate Authority. 2 In the circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ application has become infructuous. So he seeks permission to withdraw the same. Permission is granted. This application is dismissed as withdrawn. It goes without saying that if there is no legal order against continuance of the petitioner as Panchayat Teacher, she will be entitled for her arrears of salary as well as current salary. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)