IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16002 of 2010 SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, son of Late Gupteshwar Prasad Singh, Road No.4, Rajiv Nagar, P.S. Rajiv Nagar, Patna-24, District Patna. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. Magadh University, Bodh Gaya through its Registrar, District Gaya. 4. The Vice-Chancellor, Magadh Univertsity, Bodh Gaya, District-Gaya. 5. The Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, District-Gaya. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 23.9.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-University. The grievance of the petitioner is that although difference of arrears of revised pension has been paid to his father after the disposal of the writ application, vide CWJC No.12184 of 2006, the correct amount has not been paid. The said payment was made in January, 2008 and thereafter the father of the petitioner was ailing on account of paralysis and died on 27th of December, 2008. The petitioner bring it to the notice of the University that the amount has not been paid correctly by filing a representation on 30th of June, 2010, as contained in Annexure 5. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- University submits that the claim of the petitioner is that the lesser amount has been paid. However, the claim of the petitioner as indicated in the statement of the difference of pension needs to be - 2 - verified from the record. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner proposes to bring it to the notice of the concerned authority of the University afresh along with the name of the legal representative(s) of the deceased employee. In case such a representation is filed stating the details of his unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the claims be verified in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months on receipt of such representation. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)