IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12434 of 2008 DEVANTI DEVI, wife of Late Rambilash Mahto, resident of Village, P.O. and P.S. Righa (Tola Pipra), District Sitamarhi ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Principal Secretary (Home), Bihar, Patna. 3. The Inspector General of Police (Administration), Bihar, Patna. 4. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Kosi Division, Saharsa. 5. The Superintendent of Police, Saharsa. 6. The Treasury Officer, Saharsa. 7. The Treasury Officer, Sitamarhi. 8. The Accountant General (A&E), Bihar, Patna. ---Respondents ----------- 3. 2.2.2010 A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondents no.1 to 5 and a rejoinder to the said counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as well as the learned counsel appearing for the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the payment of family pension as also the arrears of revised pension of her husband, who superannuated on 31st of July, 1996 from the post of Constable having Constable No.254 while working under the Superintendent of Police, Saharsa (respondent no.5). The husband of the petitioner later died on 29th of January, 2004. The petitioner has not received the arrears of revised pension of her husband as also the arrears of family pension pursuant to the order issued by respondent no.5, as contained in Memo no.2100 dated 2.11.2008 followed by the authorization for payment issued by the Office of the Accountant 2 General on 20th of January, 2009, vide PPO/PEN20110 8060952/272531P1 20th January, 2009, as contained in Annexure B to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondents no.1 to 5, despite approaching the concerned Treasury Officer for payment. Learned counsel for the State submits that the grievances of the petitioner shall be considered without delay. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Superintendent of Police, Saharsa (respondent no.5) with a copy to the Treasury Officer, Sitamarhi (respondent no.7).In case such a representation is filed within a period of six weeks, the representation of the petitioner shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner with regard to the payment of arrears of revised pension and the family pension as also the other dues could be settled without further delay. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)