5.3.2009 Present: Mr. D. K. Khanna, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R. K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Mr. Vivek Thakur, Addl. A. G. and Mr. Anil Jaswal, Dy. A.G. for the respondents. CWP(T) 3099/2008 (OA 561/96) Mr. Khanna submits that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by a decision rendered by the Tribunal in TA No.429 of 1986 pertaining to one Dr. Dharam Pal Sharma as also a decision rendered by this Court in CWP-T No. 2119 of 2008 dated 30.12.2008 titled as Dr. Narain Dass v. State of H.P. This fact is seriously disputed by the State. Mr. Khanna, however, submits that for the time being his client would be satisfied if the State was to consider the applicability of these judgments within a reasonable time and if the petitioner’s case is squarely covered by the said decisions, he may also be given benefits. This request is not opposed by the State. In the facts and circumstances, the present petition is disposed of as not having been pressed at this stage with the directions that the petitioner’s case be considered by the respondents keeping in view the ratio laid down in the aforesaid decisions as also any other material which may be submitted by the petitioner. The additional material/ representation be furnished within a period of 4 weeks from today and the decision be taken within 12 weeks thereafter. Needless to add the State shall pass a speaking order. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the Court for redressal of his grievances, if any. The petition is disposed of accordingly. Copy dasti. ( Sanjay Karol ), Judge. March 5, 2009 (rana)