IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 6538 of 1987 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- DINESHBHAI K KADAM Versus GUJARAT ELECTRICITY BOARD -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 6538 of 1987 (MR HK RATHOD) for Petitioner No. 1 NOTICE SERVED for Petitioner No. 1 MR MD PANDYA for Respondents No. 1-3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI Date of decision: 22/10/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT On 8.11.1990 the Court passed the order as under:- "No reply has been filed even though the respondents were served long back. Rule is, therefore, made returnable in the first week of February 1991." The Court issued the notice on 22.11.1999 to the petitioner on 22.11.1999 and the same was served upon the petitioner on 29.11.1999. Thereafter on 5.10.2001 the Court passed the following order:- "Though served the petitioner absent. Mr Rathod seeks time to contact the petitioner by registered A/D post. S.O. to 19.10.2001." 2 Today also when the matter is called out, nobody is present for the petitioner. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. (Ravi R Tripathi, J.) (mohd) ***