IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 25TH JANUARY 2008 / 5TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 2516 of 2008(Y) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- Y.SAKKEER HUSSAIN, PALLIPARAMBIL HOUSE, P.O.ALATHUR, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT: ---------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, COLLECTORATE P.O., PALAKKAD. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.2516/2008 Y APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DTD. 17/01/2007. EXT.P2: EXTRACT OF THE NOTICES FOR TIMINGS CONFERENCES ON 2/07/2007, 4/09/2007, 23/10/2007, 27/11/2007 AND 28/01/2008. /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) 2516 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated: January 25, 2008 JUDGMENT Ext.P1 is the proceedings of the RTA, Palakkad, granting regular permit to the petitioner subject to settlement of timings. The petitioner submits that he has produced the current records of the vehicle. It is also submitted that though on several occasions timing conference was scheduled, on all such occasions the 1st respondent entered on leave and therefore the timing remains to be settled even today. It is stated that as a result thereof, the permit granted as per Ext.P1 is not issued so far. 2. Taking into account the submission made as above and also the submission made by the learned Government Pleader, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the timings shall be settled in respect of the permit granted to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. 3. The petitioner submits that a timing conference is already WP(C) 2516/2008 Page numbers scheduled to be held on 28.1.2008. If this item also is included in the items and subject to constraints of time, the respondent may consider the case of the petitioner as well. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-