IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-10376 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION : 18.07.2008 Parkash Kaur .... PETITIONER Versus State of Punjab ..... RESPONDENT CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. L.M. Gulati, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rupinder Khosla, Addl. A.G., Punjab. * * * While issuing notice of motion, it was ordered that in case the petitioner surrenders before the trial Court on a date fixed, she shall be released on interim anticipatory bail, subject to furnishing fresh surety, to the satisfaction of the trial Court. It was observed that this shall, however, not prevent the learned trial Court from investigating, whether the surety submitted earlier was fraudulent or not. Counsel for the respondent-State has pointed out that in terms of the aforesaid interim order, the petitioner has not surrendered before the trial court on the date fixed. This fact has not been controverted by counsel for the petitioner. He states that he is unable to explain the reasons, because no body has approached him. Dismissed. July 18, 2008 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE