IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1291 of 2009 MITHILESH SINGH son of Kartik Singh, resident of village-Sirsia, P.S.- Barhara, District- Purnia Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 02.03.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R.P.S. Singh, Addl. P.P. appearing for the State. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. The offence alleged is under sections 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that that although there is specific allegation against the named accused persons including the petitioner, however no one has been injured. It is further submitted that although the petitioner has two criminal cases against him, however in one of the case i.e. Barhara P.S. Case No. 187 of 1994 he has been acquitted and the other one being Barhara P.S. Case No. 51 of 1992 is pending in which the petitioner is likely to be acquitted. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to this petitioner. His prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is, accordingly, rejected. mcverma ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)