IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH JULY 2011 / 29TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 19690 of 2011(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. RUGMINI, W/O. LATE GURUSWAMY, MAMPALLAM, MUTHALAMADA, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678 507. 2. RATHEESHKUMAR, S/O. LATE GURUSWAMY, MAMPALLAM, MUTHALAMADA, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678 507. BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MUTHALAMADA II VILLAGE, MUTHALAMADA, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678 507. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678 101. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD - 678 001. GP SRI. HANIL KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 19690 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : A TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 8.6.2010 ISSUED TO THE 1ST PETITIONER BY 1ST RESPONDENT EXT.P2 : A TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 2.5.2010 ISSUED TO 2ND PETITIONER BY 1ST RESPONDENT EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 2.7.2011 FILED BY 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR ISSUANCE OF POSSESSION CERTIFICATE EXT.P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 2.7.2011 FILED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR ISSUANCE OF POSSESSION CERTIFICATE (True Copy) P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J .......................................... W.P.(C).19690/2011 .......................................... Dated this the 20th day of July, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.The grievance of the petitioners is that Exts.P3 and P4 applications made by them before the first respondent for the issuance of possession certificate in respect of the properties mentioned therein are still to be acted upon. Hence the petitioners approached this Court by filing the present writ petition. 2.Having regard to the above case of the petitioners, I dispose of this writ petition directing that the first respondent shall consider Exts.P3 and P4 applications made by the petitioners and pass orders thereon as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with the copy of the writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs