IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.19 of 2009 Binod Kumar Sharma Versus Shyma Sunder Pd.Agrawal@Shyam ---------------------------------- 9 14-9-2011 No body appears on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. Amresh Kumar Verma, advocate, appears on behalf of the opposite party and submits that the present revision application has become infructuous in view of the compromise between the parties by which the petitioner has agreed to vacate the suit premises within sixty days and to deliver vacant possession of the same to the decree- holder/opposite party. A photo copy of the compromise petition dated 5-10-2010 has also been produced before this Court. A perusal of the said compromise petition shows that the petitioner has agreed to withdraw this revision application in view of the compromise petition. In view of the facts stated above and also in view of the fact that no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, this revision application is dismissed for non- prosecution. roy ( V. Nath, J.)