1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION (Lodging) NO. 877 OF 2009 Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. ...Petitioner. Vs. Sumaya Mahesh ...Respondent. Mr.Prasad Das i/b. M/s.Goenka Law Associates for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 22nd January, 2010. P.C.- 1 None appears for the respondent, though served. 2 Considering the averments made and as there is clear default and as averments remain un-controverted and as though liberty was granted, none appeared for the respondent, and as this Court has already granted ad- interim relief in terms of prayer (d) on 31.08.2009 in respect of item no.1 only and as the case is made out, I am inclined to confirm the said Prayer (d). The liberty is granted to the respondent to settle the matter and furnish security and/or also apply for modification of the order. All pleas are kept open to be agitated before the Arbitral Tribunal, if any. This order shall continue till the Award is passed. 3 The petition is accordingly allowed in terms of prayer (d) for item no.1 only. No costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)