IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 8341 of 2000 Between: The Nizamabad, D.C.C.Bank Ltd., Nizamadab, Rep by its General Manager, Sri. T.Prabhakar Rao, S/o. T.Rama Rao, R/o. Nizamabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Assistant Commissioner of Labour, and the Authority Under Section 48 of A.P. Shops & Establishments Act, Nizamabad. 2 Smt. P.Balavva, W/o. Late Narasaiah, Nizamabad, D.C.C.Bank Ltd, Nizamabad. ....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: None appeared Counsel for the Respondents: None appeared The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “The petitioner herein prays that this Honourable Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or a writ, particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the proceedings of the 1st respondent dated 06-04-2000 as illegal, void and without jurisdiction and set aside the same.” On 10-07-2008, when the writ petition came up for hearing, there was no representation. Even today, in the writ petition which is posted under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, it is reasonable to presume that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing this writ petition. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition for non-prosecution, WPMP No.10865 of 2000 is dismissed as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 11th July, 2008 vrn