IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39552 of 2009 DHANAN YADAV . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2/ 14/01/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioner in a police case under Sections- 302, 201 and 120B of Indian Penal Code is that there is no eye-witness to the occurrence. The two accused who called the deceased from home are named. The petitioner is not stated to have anything to do with the land in question when he has been generally referred as one of the persons involved in the dispute with regard to lands. After investigation final form was submitted when he was not sent up for trial differing with which cognizance has been taken. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named surrender before the court below within four weeks when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Brahmpur P.S. Case No.147/2007, subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. KC/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)