IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No.12278/2008 Decided on:29.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Ravinder Singh. …Petitioner. Versus The Principal Secretary (Education) and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. M.C. Verma, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Vinod Thakur, Dy. A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. Advocate General. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Petitioner claims that his father was working as Part Time Water Carrier. He died on 21.10.2004. He is seeking compassionate appointment after the death of his father. 2. Mr. Vinod Thakur submits that the State has not framed any scheme for offering compassionate appointment after the death of a Part Time Water Carrier. He further submits that the compassionate appointment is offered to the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 level of daily wage employees, who had completed five years service. 3. Since there is no provision for offering compassionate appointment after the death of Part Time Water Carrier, this Court cannot issue any direction to the respondent-State to consider the case of the petitioner for compassionate appointment, after the death of his father, who was working as a Part Time Water Carrier. 4. Accordingly, there is no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 29.12.2010 *awasthi*