1 ca2020.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2020 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7081 OF 2010 _____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________________ Mr. R.R. Mantri, Advocate for the applicants. Mrs. Chincholkar, Advocate for respondent. 1. Application is moved in Writ Petition no. 7081 of 2010 which has been disposed of by this Court on 12th January, 2011. I have heard Advocates Mr. Mantri for applicants/petitioners and Mrs. Chincholkar for respondent. 2. Advocate Mr. Mantri has stated that the petitioners are depositing the requisite amount by D.D. and Registry should be directed to accept it. He also made a request that after appropriate decision about the regularisation of the period consumed by enquiry is reached by 2 ca2020.11 management, if the management is found entitled to recover any amount from the respondent or management is liable to pay any amount to respondent, the amount already deposited through D.D. should be allowed to be adjusted. 3. Advocate Mrs. Chincholkar states that the respondent has no objection if the amount already received by her is adjusted while working out respondent's entitlement in accordance with law. She also prays for leave to challenge the said order of adjustment if it is adverse. 5. In the circumstances, the petitioner is allowed to deposit the amount as per the order dated 12th January, 2011 by D.D. As the D.D. is with the learned Counsel, time to deposit the said D.D. is extended till 15th February, 2011. 6. After the amount is deposited, the respondent is permitted to withdraw it. 3 ca2020.11 7. Employer is free to settle the account in accordance with M.E.P.S. Rules and to adjust the amount of D.D. therein. 8. If the respondent is aggrieved by such settlement of accounts by the petitioner, the respondent is free to challenge the same before the appropriate Forum. 9. Accordingly, the Civil Application is granted with these orders. (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE. 10.02.2011 gas/ca2020.11