1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 33. WP/3498/2009 (PRAVIN KRISHNARAO KHORE AND ANR V/S THE STATE OF MAH AND others) With CA/10624/2010 In WP/3498/2009 ) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. N.R.Bhavar, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr. V.G.Shelke, AGP for R.Nos. 1, 3 and 4. Mr. V.D.Sapkal, Adv., h/f Mr. P.B.Vikhe Patil for R.6. Mr. S.V.Adwant, Adv., for R.2. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:15/10/2010 1. After substantially arguing the matter and when the intervenor also pointed out basic lacunae in the petition, Mr.N.R.Bhavar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, desires to withdraw the writ petition. Before parting, basic feature of the matter is simply required to be referred. The order is dt. 15.5.2008 and 10.6.2008, while the writ petition was filed on 8th 2 May, 2009. This point has been harped by the respondent to address alleged laches on the part of the petitioner. This avenue will be open for the respondents in future if the petitioner desires to file writ petition. For the present, the writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of accordingly. Liberty to the petitioner. 2. All issues between the parties are kept open, including laches/delay. 3. The petitioner shall pay costs of Rs.5000/- to respondent no.6. Mr. V.D.Sapkal, Counsel for respondent no.6 informs, the costs be credited to the High Court Bar Association, at Aurangabad. Civil Application for intervention disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/3498-09wp