WPMS No. 604 of 2003 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Sri J.C. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri H.M. Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarkhand, Smt. Beena Pandey, learned Standing Counsel for the State of U.P. and Sri A.K. Sharma, learned counsel for the newly impleaded respondent are present. The review application has wrongly been entertained by Additional Chief Revenue Commissioner, Circuit Court (Uttaranchal), Nainital – respondent no. 1 as respondent no. 1 has no jurisdiction to entertain the same. Respondent no. 1 ought to have transferred the review application to Board of Revenue, Allahabad. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated at bar that the petition may be disposed of with direction to Board of Revenue, Allahabad to decide the review application expeditiously. The prayer is innocuous in nature and deserves to be accepted. In view of the above, the impugned order dated 13.05.2003 passed by respondent no. 1 is set aside. Board of Revenue, Allahabad is directed to decide the review application, in question, expeditiously. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (P.C. Verma, J.) 19.06.2008 SKS