IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-17682 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.07.2011 Satbir Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Sumit Sangwan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.2 dated 29.1.2011 under Sections 409/420/467/468/471/120-B IPC, Police Station State Vigilance Bureau, Hisar. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that Sarpanch has already deposited `85,000/- with the department in compliance of order dated 2.6.2011 and his interim anticipatory bail has been made absolute by this Court today in Crl. Misc. No. M-17577 of 2011, therefore, petitioner should also be enlarged on bail. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, present petition is allowed directing the petitioner to join the investigation within a week and on his joining the investigation, petitioner shall be enlarged on bail by the Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer on furnishing personal bond and two surety bonds of Rs.20,000/- each subject to the following conditions: - i) that he shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; ii) that he shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iii) that he shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. It is made clear that in the event of violation of any of the conditions, prosecution shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of the bail. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, learned Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, on instructions from ASI Sanwar Mall, who is personally present in Court, states that petitioner has deposited a sum of `85,000/- with the department and has been enlarged on bail by the Investigating Officer. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, petition is allowed. Order dated 2.6.2011 is made absolute. (Alok Singh) Judge July 27, 2011 R.S.