IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 24061 of 2008 Between: Y. Rama Rao (Hindu) S/o. Simhachalam R/o. Velama Turangi, Ramalayam Street, Turangi Village, Kakinada Rural Mandal, E.G. District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector (Panchayat Wing) East Godavari at Kakinada. 2 District Panchayat Officer East Godavari at Kakinada. 3 Director of Town and Country, Planning Government of A.P. Hyderabad. 4 Turangi Gram Panchayat Rep. by its Panchayat Secretary Turangi (V), E.G. District. 5 Dwarampudi Mohan Rama Chandra Reddy (Hindu) S/o. Krishna Reddy R/o. Turangi (V), Kakinada Rural Mandal, E.G. District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue writ of mandamus or any appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the 4th respondent in allowing the 5th respondent to construct godown buildings in an extent of Ac.5.07 cents in Sy. No.83/1 and 83/7 of Turangi Village, Kakinada Rural Mandal, East Godavari Dist., pursuant to the technical approval of the 3rd respondent, pending consideration of the application dt.27-8-08 before the 1st respondent, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and also contrary to the resolution passed on 19-6- 2007, by the 4th respondent vide its resolution No.31 and for a consequential order directing the respondents 1 to 4 not to accord permission to the 6th respondent to construct godown buildings in an extent of Ac.5.07 cents in Sy.No. 83/1 and 83/7 of Turangi Village, kakinada Rural Mandl., East Godavari Dist.z Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.CH.DHANAMJAYA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY W.P.No.24061 of 2008 ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client has come to know about the proceedings dated 01-10-2008 issued by the Director of Town Planning which is said to have constituted the basis for the 4th respondent to take further steps. He submits that the petitioner intends to challenge the proceedings issued by the Director of Town Planning and seeks permission of the court to withdraw the petition. Permission is accorded and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn leaving it open to assail the proceedings dated 01.10.2008 of the Director of Town Planning or any other ancillary proceedings. ____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J 06-11-2008 Stp ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KBJ}