1 wp261.11 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 261 OF 2011 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 94 OF 2011 AND CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.110 OF 2011 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.116 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.261 OF 2011 Shailesh Gulab Advani. ....Petitioner Vs. Mr.Sherring Dorje, Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone 1, Mumbai & ors. ....Respondents. Mr. Charanjeet Chandrapal, advocate for Petitioner. Mr. K.V.Saste, APP for Respondent No.7-State. Mr. Mahesh Vaswani, advocate for intervenor. CORAM:- P.V.HARDAS AND M.N.GILANI, JJ DATED:- MARCH 22, 2011 P.C. 1 The Petitioner by this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prays vide prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c). 2 wp261.11 2 We have heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned APP for Respondent No.7. 3 Learned Counsel for the Petitioner has invited our attention to the pleadings of the Petitioner in this Petition as well as the documents referred to in the Petition. Upon such perusal, according to us in the light of the Judgments of the Supreme Court in ‘Aleque Padamsee Vs. Union of India' 2007 (6) SCC 171 and `Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others' AIR 2008 SC 907, the Petitioner has alternate remedy in law which the Petitioner may avail. In that light of the matter therefore, we are not inclined to interfere and we dismiss the petition relegating the Petitioner to avail of the alternate remedy available to the Petitioner in law. 4 In the light of the dismissal of the Writ Petition No.261 of 2011, Criminal Application Nos. 94/2011, 110/2011 and 116/2011 are also dismissed. (M.N.GILANI, J) (P.V.HARDAS, J)