IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA WRIT PETITION No.19773 of 2010 Between: V.Sai Ram … PETITIONER(S) And The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Special Chief Secretary, Health, Medical & Family Welfare Department and three others … RESPONDENT(S) HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA WRIT PETITION No.19773 OF 2010 ORDER: - (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B.Prakash Rao) Heard Sri Abhinand Kumar Shavili, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Services-I. At their request, this writ petition itself is being disposed of at the stage of admission. Petitioner is applicant in O.A.No.5048 of 2010 on the file of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (for short – ‘the Tribunal’), filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, wherein, by an interim order, dated 02.08.2010, the Tribunal directed the respondents to pass orders on the representation of the applicant, dated 15.07.2010, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of that order and observed that any promotions effected will be subject to the result of the O.A. By this writ of Certiorari, the petitioner seeks to quash a portion of the said interim direction, since there is no stay till its consideration. The case of the petitioner is that having regard to the questions and aspects involved, which need to be governed in the main O.A., he has already submitted a representation, dated 15.07.2010, to the respondents and by the impugned order the Tribunal directed the respondents to pass orders on the said representation and there is no direction to maintain status quo pending consideration of the said representation. His apprehension is that his services will be disturbed or otherwise affected if there is no direction to maintain status quo. Having heard the learned counsel and also on perusal of the material available on record and especially in view of the narrow compass within which the grievance involved, we are of the view that it is needless to reiterate the directions. Necessarily, the position existing as on the date of the direction should be allowed to continue without being disturbed till such consideration. To avoid any complications, be that as it may, it is felt desirable that the respondents shall not take any steps having regard to the services of the petitioner till disposal of the said representation, as directed by the Tribunal on 02.08.2010. Subject to the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J ___________________ B.N.RAO NALLA, J 13th September 2010 lmv