1 S.B.Cr.Misc. II Bail App. No. 3463/2007 (Bapu Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 19/09/2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. Sanjay Mathur for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and statement of the witnesses so far recorded by the police. The first bail application came to be dismissed on the ground that there is evidence of demand of dowry. On perusal of the statements of witnesses so far recorded, none of the witnesses stated that the accused made any demand of dowry. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, without commenting on the merit of the case, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Bapu Lal S/o Nanji be released 2 on bail in FIR No. 221/2006 P.S. Dhambola, district Dungarpur provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP