wp5816.11.odt 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETN. NO.5816/2011 Dinkar L. Bhosale -vs- Sau. Asha B. Kharat and others ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders. or directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shri Tushar Darda, counsel for the petitioner. Mrs. Rashi Deshpande, AGP for the respondent Nos.2 to 5. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : 24.11.2011. By this petition, the petitioner impugns the order passed by the Additional Collector, Buldana allowing an appeal filed by the respondents and setting aside the order passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Buldana in favour of the petitioner on 10/02/2009. By the impugned order dated 30th April, 2010, the Additional Collector directed that the name of the respondents be mutated in the 7/12 Extract. The order passed by the Additional Collector was confirmed by the Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati by the impugned order dated 9th of September, 2011. The Tahsildar, the Additional Collector and the Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati have concurrently observed that the petitioners had sold the field property to the respondents since 2003 and the 7/12 Extract produced on record showed that the respondents were wp5816.11.odt 2/2 cultivating the same and were in possession of the same. The Authorities held that the aforesaid evidence produced by the respondents had much weight and cogent and convincing was not produced by the petitioner to prove that he was cultivating the suit field. In this background, there is no infirmity in the orders passed by the Additional Collector and the Additional Commissioner directing to mutate the name of the respondents in the Revenue Record. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE KHUNTE