IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8358 of 2010 MOSTT.CHUNU KUMARI WIDOW OF LATE RANJEET SINGH R/O VILL SIRSI, P.O.SIRSI DIHRA, P.S.HARNAUT, DISTT- NALANDA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. DIRECTOR , PRIMARY EDUCATION BIHAR, PATNA 4. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION NALANDA AT BIHAR SHARIF 5. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER HARNAUT, DISTT- NALANDA 6. HEADMASTER , MIDDLE SCHOOL SIRSI, DISTT-NALANDA 7. APPELLATE AUTHORITY , DISTRICT TEACHERS EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL NALANDA AT BIHAR SHARIF THROUGH PRESIDING OFFICER ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Pramod Kumar. For the State : Mr. Chakradhari Sharan Singh, Sr. Advocate, AAG-6. For respondent No.9: Mr. Dhirendra Kumar. ______ 03. 28.2.2011 Having heard counsel for the petitioner, counsel for the private respondent and counsel for the State, the present writ application is tainted with all kinds of falsities and misleading statements filed with an object of grabbing some kind of order to hang on to a post to which she is not entitled to. Though it may not be necessary to go into the aspect whether the petitioner holds a valid intermediate degree either in terms of annexure-2 or annexure-8, filed with the supplementary affidavit, which by itself is contradictory in terms since a person cannot be expected to have two intermediate degrees from two different institutions over a period of time. That is yet another matter for the respondents to re-investigate and even take legal action if so advised. So far as the impugned order contained in 2 Annexure-7 is concerned, which is the order passed by the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Nalanda, there is a clear finding that removal of the petitioner from the post of Panchayat Siksha Mitra was not because of non-obtaining intermediate degree within thirty three months but the fact that after selection of 7 persons as Panchayat Shiksha Mitra, only 6 persons joined and the 7th who happens to be the petitioner never joined. All kinds of interpolation have been done in the records, which on verification by the appellate authority emerged and has been taken note of specially on page 25 of the said impugned order (Annexure-7). With the conduct of the petitioner and findings being what they are it is not a fit case where interference is warranted. In fact the petitioner should have been dealt with more firmly but taking into consideration that she is a young lady, who has begun her life though not in a very clean manner, the Court takes a lenient view . The writ application is dismissed as being devoid of any merit. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)