IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3271 of 2010 UMA SHANKAR PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ----------- 3 22.09.2010 A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State as also the Accountant General submits that the primary claim of the petitioner was that the period spent by him while working in the Minor Irrigation Department should had been counted for the purpose of settling the pensionary benefits. It is further submitted that the day petitioner filed the representation the order was issued that the period spent by the petitioner in the minor irrigation would be counter as the process for considering the above matted was already under consideration. Consequently authorization for payment of full pension and gratuity was issued by the Accountant General as would be appearing from Annexure-5, however for want of certain formalities for payment of the commuted value of pension could not be completed as would be appearing from Anexure-1 to the supplementary affidavit to the effect that the petitioner submitted the pension papers after expiry of one year. Be that as it may, since the order of the Court has been substantially complied with this contempt application need not proceed further. However, it will be open for the petitioner to bring it to the notice of the concerned authorities with respect to the left out grievances and he may complete the necessary formalities for receiving the commuted value of pension. The M.J.C. application accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.) - 2 -