^ l^p- TOD^- IN THE HIGH CQURJT QIL JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) Writ Petition No. ^-{Q^-t^ /2006 Petitioner Jagnarayan aged about 31 years S/o- Late Ramavtar R/o West Chirmiri, Gafai (Gadabuda), Pondi Distt. Koriya Versus Respondents v>vv.^ ^^•"^" ^^....-•""" tfSSf-" ....-^" ^^>" 1. South Eastern Cbal Field Ltdi' through its Chairsaan cum Managing Director, Seepat Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. Personnei Manager, SECL, West Chirmiri Colliery, Distt. Koriya 3. Deputy Chief Personnel Officer, , SECL,Chirmiri Area, Malviya Nagar.G. M. Complex Pondi Chirsiiri, Distt. Koriya. 4. Sub- Area Manager, SECL; West Chirmiri Colliery, Chirmiri, Distt. Koriya WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF COWSTITUTIOW OF INDIA XI-HC-78 *TI*1MI ShHT^l 3^'^raRTO', »Tnu'is,[siiniuy **»***»*.**!»•***/**<(*•<* 3T(^?T4ach ('i^lt^^ff) 3TlSRrqiTR-li+ craTsn^Tstitiit) tj^ SRiTWHferan^T 10-8-2006 Mr. Parag Kotecha, counsel Heard 6n admission. The case of the petitioner is | Trammer in the respondent Departi) Therefore, Uie petitioner's mother 4l the petitioner herein and same ha^ 14-6-2006 on the ground that the ^ of age, whereas, the date of birth o| has completed only 32 years of rejected on the ground of surmises. Learned counsel for the pet| the petitioner may be allowed respondent No.3 and in turn, res| representation after considering documentary evidence. The prayer made by learned| reasonabte. Therefore, the peti! representation to respondent No.3 necessary documents regarding qualifications and a copy of this pe( to decide the representation within after considering. the points raised in accordance with law. With the direction aforesaid, t| Parties are entitled for certifiec 4)|i|F<-l41-f WRff ff fe^l' <R|+AK ^srf^q-sn^T )rthepetitk>ner. that the petitioner's fattier was working as lent. He died in hamess on 13-10-2004. (pplied for compassionate appointment of been rejected vide Annecure P-4 dated ^etitioner has already completed 35 years the petitioner is 22-10-1974, thereby he |age as on date, therefore, it has been :ioner submits that in the cireumstances, |o make a detailed representation to frondent No.3 be directed to decide the (he age of the petitioner as per the I counsel for the petitioner is just, fair and ioner is allowed to make a detailed Iwithjn fifteen days from today along with |date of birth of the petitioner, other ftion, in turn, respondent No.3 is directed piree months from the date of its receipt j)y the petitioner, in an objective manner, :l|!e petition stands disposed of. copyofthisorder. L.C. Bhadoo judge ^ ^ ;"&