IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.53741 of 2007 BHUSHAN MAHTO @ BHARAT BHUSHAN PRASAD & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 29.7.2008 A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioners. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No.299/07 for the alleged offences registered under section 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Submission is that the present case has been lodged in retaliation to a case under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code lodged by the daughter of petitioner no.2 Arjun Prasad, as contained in Annexure 2. It is further submitted that upon investigation, the higher officials supervised the case and has observed to the effect that the allegations made in the present case are not true. Considering the submissions as noticed above, it is directed that petitioners no.1 to 5, namely, Bhushan Mahto @ Bharat Bhushan Prasad, Arjun Prasad, Sudhir Kumar @ M.K. 2 Prabhakar, Kamlesh Kumar and Akhilesh Kumar, respectively, in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No.299/07, within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M., Hilsa, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)