IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH T.A. No.121 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 31.3.2009 Rajbir ....Petitioner Versus Satish Kumar & others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr. N.D.Achint, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The only apprehension expressed in the present petition which has been moved for transfer of Misc. Appeal No.18 of 2007 pending in the Court of learned District Judge, Rewari to some other Court of competent jurisdiction is that the Presiding Officer had tried to persuade the petitioner to settle the matter with the respondents. It is the case of the petitioner that this has given rise to the apprehension in the mind of the petitioner that he will not get justice. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the apprehension of the petitioner is totally misplaced. The Court while deciding matters is cast with the bounden duty to consider other aspects of settlement as well and if such a recourse has been adopted, it does not mean that the Court is in any way prejudiced or biased. T.A. No.121 of 2009 (O&M) -2- No ground to interfere. Dismissed. 31.3.2009 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss