CWP No.11176 of 2010.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.11176 of 2010 Date of Decision: 27.09.2010 **** M/s. Cee Enn Promoters & Developers (P) Ltd. . . . . Petitioner VS. Punjab State Transmission Corporation Ltd. & Anr. . . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. IP Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Advocate for the respondents ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The controversy pertains to the installation of Towers by the respondent-Transmission Corporation Ltd. (2). The petitioner is a builder who alleges that the location of the Towers has been changed to cause obstruction in the development and peaceful enjoyment of the residential locality to be developed by it. It is also maintained that there is enough public/open land available for installation of such Towers without causing any loss or CWP No.11176 of 2010.doc - 2 – damage to the general public and farmers, as well as the petitioner. (3). Since the installation of Towers etc. is in the larger public interest and involves expertise, the writ Court would be extremely reluctant to interfere in such like matters merely on the plea of hardship being caused to a few individuals. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a self-speaking representation along with site plan and revenue records/documents in order to suggest an alternative roof/open place for installation of such Tower(s), within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order before the respondent-Authorities, who shall consider and dispose of the same after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner and by passing a speaking order, in accordance with the Instructions/Guidelines/Policy within a period of two weeks from the date of its receipt. (4). Ordered accordingly. (5). Dasti . (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 27.09.2010 CWP No.11176 of 2010.doc - 3 – vishal shonkar