^ '^^2- o m IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S) No. Z^2^t^ OF 2010. PETITIONER T. N. Mishra, S/o. Shri Baburam Mishra, aged about 51 years, Lecturer, Kanya Shiksha Parisar, Parchanpal, Bastar District Bastar (C. G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1 °."^ ^f^ ^y '•c^y ^ : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Departnient D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Departm.ent Bastar, Distt, Bastar, (C.G.) < 3. Principal, Kanya Shiksha Parisar, Parchanpal, Bastar District Bastar (C. G.) . 4. Principal, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Bastar, District Bastar (C. G.) s.^^^,^A WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner beg to submit as under:- y .Y> 3Ty^T^)T t^ri^T^n^T ^^ich ^ftcT -3~5E[ ^|<41d<4. ^Tl1<l<i<5. fa<rtl^y 3'H^T J^^K ^WW 5hHIGh^(('/<S^5LJ2-MUl /FQ WI 200 'fN-^^y" 3:n^T'^nw^f^r SB_LHJ3N^LBMR._JUST1CBJ»R!TilKIBRDIWaKSR 05.12.2010 counbel Shri Sorakant Verma, Shri Pi-aveen Das, Dy, G.A Counsel appearing for fh^ petitioner is workuig as Upper| Tribal Welfare Department. TI} examination certificate on l.Q Secoadary Education., Raipur on Counsel for fhe petitionet involved hereia as to whethe3 B.Ed. / D, Ed, exammation certific^ entifled to frwo advaace uicrenient Accordiag to the counsel f<| is eutitled to two advaace this Court ia the case of Muaaicipal C^rporation, Durg (II) MPJR 96 (CG|. This Court i^ Bharadwaj (Supra) came to the) who had obtaiaed B.Ed/B.TJ expenses are covered by fhe cir4 fhe State of Madhya Pradesh. Counsel for fhe petitionerj aad question of law iavolved ii)j covered by fhe decision of fhis kuxuiar Bharadwaj (Supra) to cni^i<n<4l'i 'RTR'df "^ 'fe^l' ipai^K ^T 3lf^R 3TT^T for the petitiouer, jfor the State. petitioner submits fhat fhe Division Teacher under the \e petitioner obtained D.Ed, i.2004 from C.G. Board of piis own expenses. •{r submits fhat the question fhe teacher, who obtained ^te on his/her own expenses is ts. ^r fhe petitioner, the petitioner in view of fhe decision of Kumar Bhardwaj Vs. ai&other reported ia 2006 the case of Yasbwaat kuniar conclusion that fhe teachers Examiiiation on tibeir own l-ulai' dated 24.12.98 issued by iEicrexdients Yasfliwajat 4ad Kl further submits fhat fhe facts the present case are squarely ICourt ia fhe case of Ya^Iiwaot wRiich counsel appearing fbr fhe 1 'ft^ if7^~4 ''i. XI-tC-22 ^^w^ ^^ '^qFTRT^. '^TTtWTS, fc«yll^ll< 3iT^?r 'cra^? imR?rT *^Jcb*t'37y;"(5;)'^^<\<A^'A<5^[ 200 '^FF^y' 3TT^T^T r<rii?h ^n^i ^TRW^R^cf 317^1'^?TT^R ^rf^T respondents fabiy concedes aiid by fbe counsel appearmg for fhe Accordiagly, fhe petition i^ passed ia fhe case of Yashwa|it subject to veri&cation of fhe facjt has acquired B,Ed Examiaation as per fhe circulars dated 24|. whefher she has been paid two order as to costs. jagrees with fhe averment miade Ipetitioner. allowed ia ternis of the order ^p.i Kuiaar Bharadwaj (Supra) as to whether the petitioner perttficate on her own expenses ,12.98 & 1.3.99 and furtlier ^dvaxice increinents or not. No cbl^(d41r< 'HFMf ^ "fe^ <f^^l< ^3Tp<W3?n^T Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge 1 -:^ tpOT