HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Sinate Bench : Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh. J. ^ ' ^G^ Criminal Revision No. 335 of 2006 Applicant Resoondent Dinesh Yadav. Aged about 35 years, S/o Shreechand Yadav, R/o Vill. Pandariya, P.0. Pandariya, P.S. Pandariya, District Raipur (C.G.) Permanent address, P.S. Karchuliya, District Rewa (M.P.) Versus Smt. Savitri Yadav, Aged about 32 years, W/o Dinesh Yadav, R/o Police Line, Nahar Nagar, P.S. City Kotwali, District Raipur (C.G.) Permanent Address Smt Savitri Yadav, W/o Dinesh Yadav, Nflllage Pandari^i, P.S. Karchuliya, District Rewa (M.P.) Criminal Revision U/S 19 (41 OF FamilvCourt Act. Present : Shri D.R.Sharma, teamed Senior Advocate with Shri B.D.Baidgaiyan, counsel for tfie appticant. Shri M.K.Bhaduri, counsel for the respondent. ORAL (Passed on 30" April, 2009) Heard on admission. 2. The applicant is aggrieved by the order dated 15.05.2006 passed jn Misc. Criminal Case No. 97/2005 by the 2"d Additional Prindpal Judge, Family Court, Raipur awarding maintenance of Rs.1,000/- to the non- applicant/wife. 3. Shri D.R. Sharma, learned Senior Advocate for the applteant submitted at the very outset that in this criminal revision he woutd assail the impugned order not on merit but onty on the ground that the maintenance awarded by the Family Court is excessive. 4. Having considered the submissions, I have perused the impugned order. 1 find that the maintenance awarded by the Family Court, Raipur is the bare mjnimum for survival and does not call any interference in exerdse of revisional jurisdiction. 5. The revision is without merit and is accordingly dismissed at the state of admission. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge