IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 629 of 2006 (M/B) 1. Joginder Kumar s/o Shri Ashok Kumar, r/o Decent Tailor Sitarganj Road, Nanakmatta, District Udham Singh Nagar 2. Moti Lal Sagar s/o Shri Ram Prasad, R/o P.O. Nanakmatta Main Market, Khatima Road, Nanakmatta, District Udham Singh Nagar. 3. Smt. Surendra Kaur w/o Dajeet Singh r/o Nanakmatta, District Udham Singh Nagar ……… Petitioners. Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar 2. The Director, Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad, Bareilly Road, Haldwani, Nainital. 3. The President of Mandi Parishad Racecourse, Dehradun, Uttaranchal. 4. The Administrator, Mandi Samiti, Sitarganj, District Udham Singh Nagar. 5. The Secretary, Mandi Samiti Sitarganj, District Udham Singh Nagar. 6. The Incharge Sub-Mandi Sta`l, Nanakmatta, District Udham Singh Nagar. ……… Respondents. ……….. Petitioner’s Counsel absent. Sri B.D. Kandpal, Standing Counsel for respondent no.1 Sri Lalit Belwal, Advocate on behalf of Sri J.C. Belwal, Advocate for respondents 2 to 6. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Petitioner’s Counsel absent. Sri B.D. Kandpal, Standing Counsel for respondent no.1 Sri Lalit Belwal, Advocate on behalf of Sri J.C. Belwal, Advocate for respondents 2 to 6. 2. As there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, we are left with no other option but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. Consequently, CLMA No. 6411 of 2006 also stands dismissed for want of prosecution. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 19.07.2006 19.07.2006 A