1 114.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.114 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.982 OF 2006 Yadayya Pushayya Kadamanchi ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... Mr.Nitin Sejpal for Applicant. Mr.Y.S.Shinde, A.P.P. for State. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED:- FEBRUARY 21, 2011. P.C. 1. This is second bail application preferred by the applicant on the ground that the applicant has substantially undergone sentence period and that the appeal is unlikely to be taken up for hearing in near future. Since the applicant has undergone 9 years, 10 months sentence as of now, as is stated by the learned A.P.P., we dispose of this Application with liberty to the applicant to renew the prayer for bail, in the event, the appeal does not reach for hearing by end of December, 2011. (A.R.JOSHI, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)