IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3119 of 2010 Bibhuti Bhushan Pathak Versus State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- 9. 7.12.2011. Mr. Alok Kumar Rahi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Satish Kumar Agrawal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Nagar Parishad, Dehri are present. Mr. Agrawal, presents a cheque of the Govt. of Bihar Non Government Institution Bodies and Funds issued by the Nagar Parishad, Dehri for an amount of Rs.2,69,160/- payable to the petitioner towards his arrears of pension. He submits that the moment the cheque is presented, the petitioner would be paid the amount through his bank account. He thus submits that the grievance of the petitioner to that extent stands redressed. The cheque is received by learned counsel for the petitioner. That brings to end, the issue involved in the contempt application. However, one aspect yet remains to be resolved, i.e. payment of current pension. Mr. Agrawal submits that due to financial stringency, as and when the grant is received from the Government, the Nagar Parishad makes the 2 payment to its employees in equitable manner and in the same manner, the petitioner would also be paid his current pension along with the other employees of the Parishad. Considering the circumstances and statement of the learned counsel for the Nagar Parishad, Dehri, the contempt application stands disposed of but with a word of caution to the Executive officer, Nagar Parishad, Dehri-Opposite Party No.2 not to adopt any pick and choose method in the matter of payment of the current pension and that the petitioner should also be paid his current pension along with other employees of the Nagar Parishad. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)