C.R.M. No.12394 of 2010 in/and -1- C.R.R. No.756 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.M. No.12394 of 2010 in/and C.R.R. No.756 of 2010 Date of Decision : 22.03.2011 Ram Kumar ……Petitioner Versus Pardeep and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI -.- Present: Mr. Sandeep Gehlawat, Advocate for Mr. Vinod Ghai, Advocate for the applicant-petitioner. *** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) C.R.M. No.12394 of 2010 For the reasons recorded, application is allowed. Delay of 57 days in filing the revision is condoned. C.R.M. No.12394 of 2010 in/and -2- C.R.R. No.756 of 2010 C.R.R. No.756 of 2010 This revision has been filed against the order of learned Sessions Judge, Jind acquitting the respondents in case F.I.R. No.286 dated 09.12.2008 registered under Sections 304 read with Section 34 IPC at Police Station Uchana, Jind. Learned Sessions Judge has discussed the evidence of all the witnesses and has pointed out various contradictions and infirmities in each of them and particularly that of PW10 Shamsher, the alleged eye witness. Learned counsel for the petitioner has taken me through the judgment passed by the learned Sessions Judge but he has not been able to convince me that the said judgment suffers from any palpable perversity or are even arguable arbitrariness. No interference is called for. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. ( AJAY TEWARI ) March 22, 2011 JUDGE ashish