«f f' 1M_THE HIGH COOBT OF JCTDIG&Tt.RE AT JABALPUR W.P. N0.^}i^^_/98 \. PETmONER: Girja ShsGkar Psndey» Aged sbout 45 yrs. S/0 Sbri Krishna Pandey* R/° 86/3 Market Cc^plex Ma'ttri Sagar Bbtlai, Teb. & Bistt. Burg. . V_E_R_S_U_S RESPONDEBTS: -UVUDI^' lt State of MP^SeeretaryHoneAffairs Vallabh Bhavan Mantrelaya, Bhopal. 2. The Bistrict Magistrste 8. Liceneing AutboritY. Durg. SSAddltional Mstrict Magistrate Burgl erf.'O6^ ^,'<ie^ 4. Sq?eFii'rt,eiaGleiat Police. Burg. y;| ^^°^^^.5'8 ^U^ ^ •T^e^^-^^rw^s!'^ ^^'^t^^°^^ ^o.^^'^" ^S^ °' '^L^<^ft^^A..?.3 ^^—e,,.^>|% ^^' ffiKET PETm©MmBffi'ARTICLES 226/227-©EtH€'^"'s * | CQNSTITOTION OF IH3IA. t ^^^^- — 1m tls-:iiiill;-:il.ttlli:J XI-HC-78 VJTOI •^roirt<i, tj>-(Tl<9<i(B, Roi'iiy ..V.^.?....S.^.^1 sntsT IWP (icrfg6R?) sn^sTOTR'fioi ?nTaii$?i(bfi<u B^?IT8R^lft?T3II^?T as.s.aoos tbe petiljion cocrectaeiss ftietrebv chaUcdsed Shri B.D. Guru, counsel fi| Shri R.R. Sinha, P.L. for Heard. By the iastant writ legality, propriety and P-6) passed by the Commission^ filed by the petitioner hereia (Annexure P-4) passed by the Ucense of the petitioner to poss^ 27702 has been suspended for The pctitioner has fh.e said order has been passe<| petitioner to explaui his con(| iadefinite period, whereas undejr Anus Act period of auspensior^ District Magistrate. Leamed coiinsel for fhe ik question was suspended on ac<) Police, Durg. But the fact suspended wifhout affording conduct and fhat too for ftiet provisions of Section 17(3) ofl auihmity may by order in wriftnj thinks fit or revokes a hcen-s^ suspension has not been speei^t the retum ftiat soine case undet ^r fhe petitioner. State. wi«[CT<i1*i*iiiCTl"^T"fei<9 <i|ui'K;i'< !|?giRlH3ii^?i the petitioiier has questioned ths of order dated 27.6.1998 (Anaexure [r, Raipur Division, Raipur in an appeat aEBrmine the order dated 5.7. 1997 ()istrict Magistrate, Raipur whereby the ss a fixe arm. i.e. 32 Bore Revolver No.S- ^he uidefiiiite period. the above order on fhe groimd that without givmg any opportuEdty to fhe ^uct aad same has been passed for the provisions of Section 17(3) of the ought to have been inentioned by the sspondents submits that fhe Ucense in [ount of report of the Superintendent of that liceuse In question has been i^iortunily to the petitioner to explaiu his indefiiute period, whereas uiider the fhe Act envisages fhat 'the liesnsmg suspendf. a licencefor suchperiod as it In the present case fhe period of ted, nioreovcr, it has bcen inentioncd in Section 420 ofIPC & Section 27 offhe reiaBuxs oplpo \3-DC|'«|«le)0,l»^Tl<M<|<»,Roitiy ITOOT^HT^ ' ^1^200 sn^?Tw (ijcii^ci^) 3ll^?rq5TR!'li* ?RIT3II^CTd>*li* BmrsR-uRt) si^vi Prevention of Corruptioa Act wa^ pardculars ofthat case has not 1} !n view of above, fhe orde^ fhe Commissioaer dated 27.6. Magistrate are hereby quashed directed to paas tbe appropriat^ consideriag atl the iiiaterials opportunily of heariug to ttie Wifh the direction aforesayi Certified copy as per rules. pet(tioner. coi<<(n<i1i ii*inY*tfs'cl •!(uit<;i\ E&3ri^ISII^?I pending agaiust tlie petitioner but the \ees. inentioned. dated 5.7.1997 as weU as the order of 1998 confimung the order of District and ttie District Magistrate, Durg is : orders in. accordance with law after ^vailable on record aad after giviiig ., fhe petition stands disposed of.