IN THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF CMHATISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No.M^ ,^0f2011 PETITIONER Awadhesh Kumar Napit, S/o Bhagirath Napit, Aged about 51 years, Upper Division Teacher, Posted at Govt. Midlle School, Budhikhar, Block Masturi, Dist Bilaspur,(C.G.) ^D VERSUS RESPONDENTS: ^ l.The State of Chhattisgarh., through the secretary, School Education Department, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, raipur (C.G.).- 2. The Director, Director, Directorate ofPublic Public Instructions, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Collector Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. The Director District Education Officer, Bilaspur, Dist Bilaspur (C.G.) ^"' 5. The Principal Govt. High. Sec. School Budhikhar, Bilaspur, Dist Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION 1JNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^'< HIGH COIJRT OF CHHATHSOARH AT B?TA8PIJ^ PETmONER WRTT PETmON (S) No. 4895 of2011 AwaAesh Kiimar Na-pit. RESPONDENTS VRR8IJ8 The Stete ofChhatisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDBR ARTICLE 226 QF THE CONSTITIJTION OF DSB)IA SB: Hon*ble Shri Satish K. Aeniliotri, J. Pre^erst: Shri Shaitetidra Diibey, Advocate tbr the petrtloner. Shri Shashaisk Thalaxia, Paael Lawyer fbr tiie SteteA'esposidetits. ORDKR (ORAI.) (Passedon 02na dayofSeptemb@r,201!) 1. Challenge in this petition is to the wder (Ned 15.07.2011 (Armexiire P/l) wfaereby^ the petitiofxer workmg as Upper Divisioia Tea-cte at Middle Scfaool, BudhiJdsar, Biod<; Mastori to Middle Schooi, Chhata, Mimgeli^ on admimstrative groimdsi. 2. Shri Diibey, leamed coimsel apptarmg for tlie petitioner ^iibmits tiat agamst tfae impy.gned toinsfer orie^ tlw petitioss^r ha^ maie a representation to the Collect-or, Bilaspiir on 21.07,2011 (Aimexxxre P/6) for po^tmg him at a Bearby place m view ofthe ailmait ofttie petitiooer as well as his wife. Shri Diibey iiMth^r ^bmite tliat tfae has not yet been decided. 3- ' Shri Thakw, leamed Paael La.wyir a.ppearing for tlie State/respondeiits submite tliat if the represesitatioM of th@ petitioner, as aforesated, is pendmg consideration, tlie " be considered and decided witNn a period of 15 days fi'om the date ofreceipt ofa eopy ofthis order. He fiirther siibmits that till then, statiis qao m respect ofthe pla.eement ofthe petitioii^ as oNams today, shall be maiiitamed. 4. In view ofthe afoove, accordmg to Shri Dubey^ notMng siirviv^s m tNs petition for adjydicatiosi^ 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dteposed of with tte <zforesaid observation. No order asto co^.s, Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Amit