IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID MONDAY, THE 4TH JULY 2011 / 13TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 2179 of 2011(V) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- SINDHU MADHUSOODHANAN, W/O.MADHUSOODHANAN, PROPRIETRIX, M/S.SOORYA WOOD DESIGNS, NANDIKKARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.T.N.MANOJ RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. PARAPPOOKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, PARAPPOOKKARA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. - 680310 2. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD DISTRICT OFFICER, POONKUNNAM, THRISSUR - 680 001 3. SHRI M.T.SEBASTIAN, MUTTATHUKUNNEL HOUSE, NANDIKKARA P.O., THRISSUR - 680 301 ADV. MR.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM FOR R3 MR.M.K.CHANDRAMOHAN DAS, SC, POLL.C.BOAR FOR R2 MR.P.RAMAKRISHNAN FOR R-1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 2179 of 2011(V) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION FROM THE KHADI AND VILLAGE COMMISSION. EXT.P2: LICENCE FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF THE FACTORIES AND BOILERS. EXT.P3: CONSENT FROM THE PANCHAYAT. EXT.P4: RECEIPT FROM THE PANCHAYAT EVIDENCING RENEWAL OF D & O LICENCE FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF THE FACTORIES AND BOILERS. EXT.P5: NOTICE ISSUED BY THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD. EXT.P6: NOTICE ISSUED BY THE PANCHAYAT. EXT.P7: RECEIPT EVIDENCING PAYMENT RECEIVED BY THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD. EXT.P8: REPRESENTATION BEFORE THE PANCHAYAT. EXT.P9: REPRESENTATION BEFORE THE PANCHAYAT. EXT.P10: PETITION/REQUEST FILED BEFORE R2. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: EXT.R2(a): LETTER NO.PCB/TSR/COM/CHY/99 DTD. 24.5.2008. EXT.R2(b): LETTER NO.PCB/TSR/COM/CHY/99 DTD. 24.6.2008. EXT.R2(c): LETTER NO.PCB/TSR/COM/CHY/99 DTD. 07.12.2009. EXT.R2(d): LETTER DATED 24.11.2010. ORDER ON I.A.NOS.3301 & 8703/2011 DISMISSED. 4.7.2011 SD/- HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE. // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE. HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No.2179 Of 2011 ---------------------- Dated this the 4th day of July, 2011. J U D G M E N T The learned counsel for the petitioner requested this Court to dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn since no relief is necessary at this stage. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner and respondents to approach this Court if circumstances warrants. HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge. bkn/-