~3N0N~APPLxcams M aged about urlidhar Singh, Government Girls ’Distt.Sarguja(W) v k -Versus ~ 1. The Siiate 9f Madhya Prade$1 , through the Secretary, Higher Education Department, Vallabh Bhawan. 2. The miséioner, Bhopal( NP) . BhopaMMP). Higher Education Department, M.P.. 3. The Additiénal Directcr. Higher Educaticn Department, Bilaspur Divis ion, BilaspurU'P). 4. The Principal; Gavernment‘ Girls College, a Ambikapur, Distt. 5argujaww) a’ DETME OF TEE APPLIGkTION ‘sE‘c‘rI’ON 19 0'? THE Anmmgs'mm A V IVE TRxBUNALs Ac'r'as. " .._.‘.._A._‘_.__‘_._.‘. ._‘.~‘ _ , ) M . HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 1948 of2005 APPLICANT : Somendra Pratap Singh. VERSUS NON-APLICANTS : The State of Madhya Pradesh & Others. APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS ACT. 'J . hri Satish K. S A SB: Hon’hle Prwent: ‘ None Shri AV.Shridhar, for the petitioner. Panel Lawyer for the State/reapondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 01“ day of February, 20 16) The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. In View of the above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. Registry is directed to send a copy ofthis order to the petitioner, forthwith. ‘ . ' . r ‘ Sdl- ‘ Satish K. Agniimtri ' Judge i