IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 26TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 4TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 23156 of 2011(T) ----------- -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- RAJAN P.K, S/O.KAVALAN, AGED 47, MANAKAL PARAMBIL, CHERIAVAPPALASSERY ANGAMALY SOUTH P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI. JEEVAN MATHEW MANAYANI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. SENIOR DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER SOUTHERN RAILWAY TRIVANDRUM 695 014. 2. SOUTHERN RAILWAY REPRESENTED BY ITS SENIOR, DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER SOUTHERN RAILWAY, TRIVANDRUM 695 014. 3. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO RAILWAYS, RAIL BHAVAN, NEW DELHI 110 001. R1-2 BY ADVS. SRI. MOHAMMED SHAH, SC, RAILWAYS SRI. C.S. DIAS, SC, RAILWAYS R3 BY ASG SRI. P. PARAMESWARAN NAIR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JJJ WPC NO: 23156/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE COMMUNITY CERTIFICATE ISSUED IN FAVOUR TO THE PETITIONER P2: COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT INVITING APPLICATIONS FOR JTBS (JANA SADHARAN TICKET BOOKING SEVAK) P3: COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER FOR THE JTBS SUBMITTED BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT P4: COPY OF THE PETITIONER FILED ALONG WITH EXHIBIT P3 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. JUDGE JJJ ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 23156 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 26th day of September, 2011 J U D G M E N T The challenge in the writ petition is against Ext.P2 notification issued by the 1st respondent inviting applications for appointment as JTBS (Jana Sadharan Ticket Booking Sevak), to the extent it requires that conduct certificate issued by the District Judge should be produced. 2. It is now submitted on behalf of the respondents that by order dated 14/9/11, the said provision in Ext.P2 has been amended and that certificates issued by the various authorities including Tahsildar is ordered to be sufficient. In that view of the matter, it is unnecessary to go into the merits of the case and the writ petition is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp