1 (cri wp.4871 of 2010) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4871 OF 2010 Mukesh Shobhagmal Jain & Anr. ...Applicants Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents ----- Mr. A.K. Chouhan for Applicants Mr.Dilip Tarachand Shah -Respondent No.3 present in person. Mr.Rajesh More -APP for the State ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 18TH NOVEMBER, 2010 P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Applicants, the learned APP for the State and the Respondent No.3, who is appearing in person. 2. This is an application filed for quashing the criminal complaint filed by the Respondent No.3 for the offences punishable under sections. 420, 40-6, 465,467, 468,471 r/w. 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code vide FIR No. 368 of 2001 registered with D.B. Marg 2 (cri wp.4871 of 2010) Police Station. 3. The Respondent No.3 has filed an affidavit in which, he has stated that he does not wish to proceed further in criminal cases. He has stated that he has already withdrawn the two other cases filed by him in the Learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 14th Court, Girgaon, Mumbai on 7.8.2008. Since the dispute between the parties is personal one and the parties have now settled the dispute amicably and in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Jagdish Chanana vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr. [AIR 2008 SC, 1968], in my view, it is a fit case for quashing the criminal complaint. 4. The criminal application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Application is allowed and disposed of accordingly. (V.M. KANADE J.)