IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.51269 of 2008 1. Md. Idrish s/o Abdul Hafeej Marhoom. 2. Maimun W/O Idrish. Both residents of Village- Chhachhua, P.S. Bisfi, District-Madhubani. 3. Parveen, D/O Md. Idrish, w/o Md. Mumtaz, resident of Village- Izara, P.S. Rahika, District- Madhubani. 4. Md.Habi, son of Md. Sayeed Alam, resident of Village- Khajuri, P.S. Madhubani, District- Madhubani. 5. Md. Sadik, S/o Salam, resident of Village- Balha, P.S. Bisfi, District- Madhubani…………………………………Petitioners. -Versus- The State of Bihar………………………………Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 17.03.2009. Heard the counsel for the petitioners, State and the informant. Petitioner no.1 is father-in-law, petitioner no.2 is mother-in- law, petitioner no.3 is sister-in-law and petitioner nos. 4 and 5 are brothers-in-law of the informant. Husband of the informant has not been made an accused in the F.I.R. which has been instituted alleging offences under Sections 341l, 323,379,498(A)/34 of the I.P.C. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the case has been instituted by the informant in conspiracy with her husband as they want their share in landed property which according to Muslim Law can not be partitioned during life time of father. Considering these facts, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, the petitioners Md. Idrish, Maimun, Parveen, Md. Habi and Md. Sadik are directed to be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the - 2 - satisfaction of the C.J.M., Madhubani in connection with Rahika P.S. Case No. 249 of 2008, G.R. No. 1505 of 2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U.K. (Mridula Mishra,J)