IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.4668 of 2010 TULI MAHTON, s/o Sri Sharan Mahton Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 18.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 302,201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been stated that in the First Information Report that the husband of the informant left with one Chunnu Parasad and thereafter did not return. The informant made query from several persons in course of which the petitioner disclosed that the deceased has been done to death, on account of which, the informant suspected the hand of the present petitioner as well. However, there is no eye witness to the occurrence. Under the circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, who is in custody since 12.1.2010, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh, Patna, in connection with Belchchi P.S. case no.11 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground - 2 - of misuse, and (iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)