1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.8579 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.8579 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.8579 OF 2005 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.978 OF 2002 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.978 OF 2002 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.978 OF 2002 Satish Vikram Maske ...Applicant Satish Vikram Maske ...Applicant Satish Vikram Maske ...Applicant Vs. Vs. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents ----- ----- ----- Mr. S.M. Oak for Applicant Mr. S.M. Oak for Applicant Mr. S.M. Oak for Applicant Mr.A.S. Gadkari A.P.P. for the State Mr.A.S. Gadkari A.P.P. for the State Mr.A.S. Gadkari A.P.P. for the State CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. DATED: 12TH JANUARY, 2006 DATED: 12TH JANUARY, 2006 DATED: 12TH JANUARY, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard. . Heard. . Heard. 2. The Applicant was granted furlough 2. The Applicant was granted furlough 2. The Applicant was granted furlough leave/temporary bail by this Court on medical grounds leave/temporary bail by this Court on medical grounds leave/temporary bail by this Court on medical grounds and this application has been made for extension of and this application has been made for extension of and this application has been made for extension of the same. the same. the same. 3. The Applicant has already surrendered in jail 3. The Applicant has already surrendered in jail 3. The Applicant has already surrendered in jail and he has the remedy of applying for Parole Leave and he has the remedy of applying for Parole Leave and he has the remedy of applying for Parole Leave under Rule 19 of the Bombay Prisons (Furlough and under Rule 19 of the Bombay Prisons (Furlough and under Rule 19 of the Bombay Prisons (Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959. Hence, the application is Parole) Rules, 1959. Hence, the application is Parole) Rules, 1959. Hence, the application is disposed of with such a liberty. disposed of with such a liberty. disposed of with such a liberty. 4. If the application for Parole leave is 4. If the application for Parole leave is 4. If the application for Parole leave is submitted within a period of one week, we direct that submitted within a period of one week, we direct that submitted within a period of one week, we direct that the same be considered as expeditiously as possible the same be considered as expeditiously as possible the same be considered as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of 2 weeks from its and preferably within a period of 2 weeks from its and preferably within a period of 2 weeks from its submission. submission. submission. 2 (ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.) (ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.) (ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.)