/ 1 / IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.368 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2211 OF 2007 Laxman Manohar Divekar ..Applicant Vs. Rajiv Vitthal Khopade & Anr. ...Respondents --- Shri D.M. Gupte for Applicant Shri D.P. Adsule, APP for State ---- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED 13TH OCTOBER,2008 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant. It is submitted that despite the best efforts taken by the Applicant, the Respondents could not be served. He, therefore, submits that the office may be directed to issue fresh notice and further direction be given to the Commissioner, Pune City to locate the whereabouts of the Respondent No.1. Application accordingly is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). The Commissioner, Pune City is directed to find out whereabouts of the Respondent No.1 and submit a report to this Court within six weeks from today. Issue fresh notice, which is made returnable after six weeks. The Applicant is also directed to serve the Respondent by Humdust or by personal service. Application is disposed of. V.M. KANADE J.