IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.O.P.C. No. 50 of 2010. Decided on 21.05.2010. _____________________________________________________ Bihari Lal. …Petitioner. -Versus- Shri Raghubir Chaudhary and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. Adarsh Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents has produced a copy of office order dated 20th May, 2010, which is permitted to be taken on record. A bare perusal of the office order reveals that the needful has been done and the petitioner has been re-engaged. Consequently, the petition is rendered infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous. Notices are discharged. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge May 21, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?