sat 1 wp 7915-2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7915 OF 2011 Neetha K. Gopal ...Petitioner vs. India Meteorological Department, New Delhi & Ors. ...Respondents Ms.Gayatri Singh for the Petitioner. Mrs.Aruna Pai for Respondent Nos.1, 4 and 5. Mr.Vinod Joshi for Respondent No.3. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE AND M.L. TAHALIYANI, JJ. OCTOBER 19, 2011 P.C :- 1 Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2 Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing of the writ petition, the petitioner has received two communications dated 30th September, 2011 and 19th October, 2011 issued by respondent no.1. In view thereof, she has instructions not to press this writ petition and seek liberty to the petitioner to make representation to respondent no.1 for taking appropriate action against respondent no.3 in the light of judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Vishaka and others vs. State of Rajasthan and others., reported in AIR 1997 SC 3011. sat 2 wp 7915-2011 3 The said communications are taken on record. The petition is disposed of as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner as prayed. If the petitioner makes any such representation, respondent no.1 shall deal with the same in accordance with law and so also in the light of the observations of the Supreme Court in the case of Vishaka (cited supra). It is made clear that while making this observation, this Court has not examined the allegations against respondent no.3 and/or the merits of the petitioner’s contention against respondent no.3. 4 It is open to respondent no.1 to deal with the representation after following the due procedure, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 5 At this stage, learned Counsel for respondent nos.1, 4 and 5 submits that respondent no.3 has been discontinued as a member of the Screening Committee. Her statement is accepted. (M.L. TAHALIYANI, J.) (D.B. BHOSALE, J.)