1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3573 OF 2010 (R & Y Logistic Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. vs. Avinash D. Kolte & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. AUGUST 03, 2010. Heard Shri Gharote, learned counsel for the petitioners – defendants. The trial Court has vide order passed below Exh. 23, permitted Respondent No. 1 – plaintiff to join subsequent proposed purchasers as party defendants in a suit for specific performance. Shri Gharote, learned counsel contends that there is no agreement between the petitioners and Respondent No. 1 and by taking shelter of such tactics, the suit itself is not allowed to be decided. He, however, states that there is no interim order operating in favour of the respondents. It is, therefore, apparent that when sale executed by the petitioners in favour of proposed defendants is accepted, no prejudice is caused to the petitioners in the matter. Shri Gharote, learned counsel wants to rely upon several judgments to urge that said subsequent purchasers are not necessary party to the suit. However, 2 I am not inclined to look into those judgments. I do not find anything wrong with the discretion exercised by the trial Court. Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. The trial Court shall keep in mind the earlier directions issued by this Court expediting the suit and shall attempt to have it decided at the earliest. JUDGE *GS.