$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 407/2001 RAGUHBIR & ORS. .....Appellant Through: Mr. S.S. Chillar, Advocate versus DULI CHAND SHARMA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Urvesh Bhardwaj, proxy counsel for Mr. J.K. Jain, Advocate for R-2 & 4 CORAM: MS. PANNA DUTTA, REGISTRAR O R D E R % 12.07.2024 CM APPL.59338/2023 (u/O 22 Rule 3 CPC moved by LRs of appellant No.2 for their substitution) 1. Learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 4 submits that he has no objection if the application is allowed and does not want to file reply. 2. Re-notify on 14.10.2024. RFA 407/2001 & CM APPL.18783-85/2022 3. Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that application moved by him for bringing on record the LRs of respondent Nos.1, 3 and 5 is still lying under objection. Let needful be done for bringing on record the application before the next date of hearing. 4. Re-notify on 14.10.2024. REGISTRAR JULY 12, 2024 vk This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/07/2024 at 12:06:38