IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14755 of 2006 VIJAY SHANKAR, aged about 29 years, son of late Sukhdeo Singh, resident of Mohalla West Tilha Dharamshala, P.S. Civil Line, District Gaya … Petitioner Versus 1. THE C.E.O.,MUNICIPAL CORPN.GAYA, (Water Board), P.S. Civil Line, District Gaya 2. The Administrator, Gaya Municipal Corporation (Water Board), Gaya, P.S. Civil Line, District Gaya 3. The Executive Engineer, Municipal Corporation, Water Board, Gaya, District Gaya … Respondents with CWJC No.15960 of 2006 AMRENDRA KUMAR SINHA, aged about 33 years, son of late Surendra Prasad Sinha, resident of Mohalla Ghughari Tarn, P.S. Civil Line, District Gaya … Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, through the Commissioner cum Secretary, Urban Development Department, Bihar, Patna 2. The Mayor, Gaya Municipal Corporation (Water Board), Gaya 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Gaya Municipal Corporation (Water Board), Gaya 4. The Executive Engineer, Gaya Municipal Corporation (Water Board), Gaya … Respondents with CWJC No.2379 of 2007 BIRENDRA KUMAR, aged about 23 years, son of late Lalita Prasad, resident of Mohallah Deghi Tank, Moti Sen Bagicha, P.S. Civil Line, District Gaya … Petitoiner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, through the Commissioner cum Secretary, Urban Development Department, Bihar, Patna 2. The Mayor, Gaya Municipal Corporation (Water Board), Gaya 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Gaya Municipal Corporation (Water Board), Gaya 4. The Executive Engineer, Gaya Municipal Corporation (Water Board), Gaya … Respondents with CWJC No.15884 of 2006 2 DINESH YADAV, aged 25 years, son of late Chamari Yadav, resident of Mohalla Ghughari Tarn, P.S. Civil Line, District Gaya … Petitioner Versus 1. THE MAYOR, GAYA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, Gaya (Water Board), Gaya 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Gaya Municipal Corporation (Water Board),Gaya 3. The Executive Engineer, Gaya Municipal Corporation (Water Board), Gaya … Respondents ----------- 3. 31.3.2011 Mr. Virendra Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that during the pendency of all these writ applications the grievances of all the petitioners have been redressed. That being so, these applications have become infructuous and are, accordingly, dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/