1 WP : 977/2002 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.630 of 2003 Shri Haribhau Hiru Thakur ... Petitioner -Versus- Smt. Chandrabai Haribhau ... Respondents Thakur & Ors. Ms. Gauri Godse for Petitioner. None for for respondents. Mrs. G.P. Mulekar APP for State. CORAM: SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. Date : 17th November, 2011. P.C.:- 1. This Writ petition is directed against the order dated 28th November 2002 passed by the Sessions Judge, Raigad at Alibag in Criminal Revision Application No.6 of 2000. By the impugned judgment and order, the application filed by the respondent Nos.1 and 2 for maintenance was partly allowed and the maintenance awarded by the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class to respondent no.2, daughter was confirmed and the order of award of maintenance to respondent no.1- wife was set aside. Ms. Godse, learned counsel for the 2 WP : 977/2002 petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present petition, respondent no.2 attained majority. Therefore, the order of maintenance to her ceased to be in operation. In that circumstance, nothing remains for consideration of the court in the present petition. The petition is accordingly disposed off, as having become infructuous. (Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J) 3 WP : 977/2002 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.109 of 2003 Smt. Chandrabai Haribhau ... Petitioner Thakur Vs. Shri Haribhau Hiru Thakur ... Respondents & Ors. None for for petitioner Ms. Gauri Godse for respondents Mrs. G.P. Mulekar APP for State. CORAM: SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. Date : 17th November, 2011. Petitioner and her Advocate absent. The writ petition is dismissed for default. (Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J)