FAO 5/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA (By Ranjan Gogoi, J.) These two appeals are directed against an order dated 12.1.2010 passed b y the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) No.3, Kamrup, Guwahati in Misc. (J) Case No.12 of 2010 arising out of Title Suit No.20 of 2010. The said order dated 12.1.2010 has been passed by the learned Trial Court on a petition filed by the plaintiff No.1 and 2 under Order XXXIX, Rule 1 and 2, read with Section 151 C.P .C. praying for grant of ad-interim injunction. The learned Trial Court after issuing notice to the opposite party (defe ndants in the suit) took the view that as a prima facie case had been made out, considering the balance of convenience, the case deserves an ad-interim injuncti on to restrain the defendants from creating any disturbance in respect of use, p ossession and control of the plaintiff Nos. 3 to 13 (companies) by the plaintiff Nos. 1 and 2 and also to restrain the defendants from changing the constitution of the Board of Directors of the opposite party-defendant No.3 and further to r estrain the defendants from taking any loan in the name of opposite party-defend ant No.3. The above order was passed ex-parte considering the urgency of the mat ter. Aggrieved, this appeal has been filed. Right from the very inception of the appeals, the learned counsels for b oth the sides have prayed for time to enable the parties to resolve the differen ces leading to the suit in question. However, though over five months have elaps ed, no progress in this regard has been made. Instead, even today further time h as been prayed for by the learned counsel for the appellants. The order impugned is an ad-interim order. Notice on the injunction peti tion has been issued by the learned Trial Court. Both the contesting parties hav e appeared before this Court. In such a situation, we are of the view that inste ad of entertaining the appeals, it would be prudent to direct the contesting par ties to appear before the learned Trial Court on 25th May, 2010, which, we are t old, is the date fixed by the learned Trial Court in the case. On such appearanc e, the learned Trial Court will decide the injunction application within a perio d of two weeks from the said date i.e. the date fixed for appearance of the part ies before the learned Trial Court. Beyond the above, no further order in the ap peal would be justified. Both the appeals and the connected miscellaneous cases shall stand dispo sed of in the above terms.