IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11894 of 2006 SUDHIR KUMAR S/o Sri Umesh Kumar, R/O At-P.O. Bangaon, P.S. Bazpatti, District Sitamarhi,........ Petitioner Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA through the Inspector General of Police, C.R.P.F., Bihar, Patna. 2. The Dy. Inspector General of Police,C.R.P.F. Sindri. 3. The Commandant, 94 Batalian through Dy. I.G. C.R.P.F Sindri ......... Respondents. ----------- 7 30-1-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Union of India. Petitioner has challenged the office order dated 13-6-2006 passed by Deputy Inspector General of Police, Sindri whereby petitioner has been removed from service as a constable in C.R.P.F. on the ground that illegality was committed in course of recruitment and selection at the concerned centre in large scale. Through an I.A. petitioner has also challenged the appellate order dated 2-1-2007 confirming the impugned order of removal. From the materials on record it appears that subsequently the allegation of malpractice and manipulation in course of recruitment and selection was handed over to Central Bureau of Investigation ( in short C.,B.I.). After concluding the investigation the C.B.I. has not found anything against the recruited constables. On the basis of such report of the C.B.I. this court allowed several writ petitions including C.W.J.C.No. 14711 of 2004 ( Pradeep Kumar Mishra Vrs. Union of India and another) and C. W.J.C. No. 927 of 2005 ( Awadhesh Kumar Vrs. The Union of India) by judgment and order dated 27-2-2006 and an earlier order in this case shows that - 2 - Naresh since those orders were challenged in Letters Patent Appeal, this writ petition was kept pending awaiting the disposal of concerned L.P.A. It is not in dispute that now the L.P.A preferred by the Union of India and others has been dismissed on 22nd September, 2008. In the facts of the case noticing that similarly situated constables have been granted relief, this writ petition is allowed, the impugned order of removal contained in annexure-1 as well as the appellate order are quashed. The authorities of the C.R.P.F. are directed to accept the joining of the petitioner forthwith and also to pay his entire arrears of salary from the date of removal at the earliest, preferably within three months. It goes without saying that on joining petitioner shall be entitled to his current salary. ( Shiva Kirti Singh,J)