•w 7 nd ^« IN THE HIGH ^^<^€--". ^,-f'Q ^••"'' ...••* '...-•^^••:"" ...-••"" .•***' v _'.*'y //' ^B*"*' ^-^s^""' ^^^^" ^ R IF X^' ?^ ^,\ f IHGl£ Bl-Ku 3 IRT OF JUDICATURE, CHHATISGARH AT BILASUR. WRIT PETITION NOE/.;1 /\. '005. PETITIONER 7 RAM PRASAD RAJPUT, S/0 BHAGWANDEEN RAJPUT AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/0 INDRASEN NAGAR, MANGLA, BILASPUR DIST. C.G.STATE VERSUS COMMISSIONER, MUN1CIPAL CORPORATION, BILASPUR. C.G.STATE /^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT (S) / ORDER (S) / DIRECTION (S), ETC. RESPONDENTS. ^ r^An-T-t/^p ii Ann ^\s- -TE «;- ffl c^o mpH COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH ATBILASPUR- WRITPETITIONNo. 6462 of2005 PETITIONER : Ram Prasad Rajput. VERSUS RESPONDENT : Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB:Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aenihotri. J. ^ Present: Shri K.R.Nair, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.S.Kachhwaha and Smt. Hamida Siddique, Advocates for the respondent. • ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 10U1 day of December, 2010) 1. Leamed counselappearmg for the petitioner submits that the instant petition was filed on 20.12.2005, seeking a direction to the respondent-Corporation to renew his license as Architect. Shri Nair further submits that the petitioner may be permitted to make a fresh representation to the i-espondent authorities for consideration of his case for renewal ofhis license and in tum, the respondent authorities may be directed to consider his application in accordance with law, as early as possible. -• 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondent-Municipal Cbrporation, Bilaspur, submit that there is no objection to the above stated submission made by leamed counsel for the petitioner. In the event, an application is made, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law on its own merits and perspective, as early as possible, preferably wifhin aperiod ofthree weeks. 3. In view ofthe above, according to leamed counsel appearmg for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication at this stage. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Sadsh K. Agniliotri Amit