IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH MAY 2007 / 9TH JYAISHTA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 575 of 2007(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.3336/2007 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN W.P(C) 3336/2007 ---------------------------------------------------------- N.GOPINATHAN NAIR, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O.NARAYANAN NAIR, SOUPARNIKA, T.C.9/1901(1) EDAVACODU, SREEKARIYAM P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.AJITH KRISHNAN SRI.S.MOHAMMED AL RAFI RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS IN W.P(C) NO.3336/2007 ----------------------------------------------- 1. THOMAS C.GEORGE, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. MATHEW C.KUNNUNGAL, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. K.JOSE SYRIAK, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) PRINCIPAL FINANCE SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. SUNDARAM, (AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE CHIEF ENGINEER, PWD BUILDINGS & LOCAL WORKS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. RAMESH, (AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, BUILDING & LOCAL WORKS (SC), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6. SHAHUL HAMMED, (AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BUILDINGS DIVISION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY G.P.SRI.N.MANOJ KUMAR. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/05/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J. =================================== Cont. Case (Civil)No.575 of 2007 =================================== Dated this the 30th day of May, 2007. JUDGMENT By Annexure-A judgment, there was a direction to disburse the amounts due to the petitioner in terms of Exts.P1 and P2 on or before 27-3-2007. As of now, the amounts found due ultimately has been released on 9-4- 2007. If there is any further dispute between the petitioner and the respondents regarding the quantum of amounts due under the contract, it will be open to them to seek appropriate remedies in accordance with law before the appropriate authority including the appropriate courts. The short delay in satisfying Annexure-A judgment is excused having regard to the apology tendered by the notified officers through the learned Government Pleader. The officers are also present. The matter is closed dropping further proceedings. Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, Judge. sl.