1 S.B.CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO.49/2009. Balram. VERSUS Shri Kishan Swaroop. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO.49/2009. Balram. VERSUS Shri Kishan Swaroop. 22.05.2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.Vishwajeet Mantri, for the appellant. Mr.Amit Gupta ] Mr.Rinesh Gupta ] for the respondent. ***** Heard learned counsel for the parties. In this second appeal the appellant has formulated the following substantial question of law:- “Whether the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 has been repealed by virtue of Section 32 of Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 for the municipal area where Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 has not been extended?” This question has been raised as the present suit for eviction of the appellant who was a tenant had been filed under the provisions of the Transfer of Property Act. After the repeal of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 by Section 32 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 the tenants do not enjoy the protection of the rent control legislation save in areas where the New Act of 2001 has been made applicable. 2 S.B.CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO.49/2009. Balram. VERSUS Shri Kishan Swaroop. The learned counsel for the appellant has raised much the same submissions which have already been decided by this court in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.12872/2008 [Mangi Lal Saini Vs. Civil Judge (Jr.Div.), Choumu and Another] vide judgment dated 06.04.2009 where the contention regarding partial repeal of the Act of 1950 by virtue of Section 32(1) has been rejected. In view of the above, I am not persuaded to take a different view. This appeal is accordingly dismissed summarily. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.