”kg; . RETURV ON BEHALF §F RESPONDgNTD The answering respomients, respectLully submlt as under :- 1. ‘ That pplicatlon £ ,alpur should submltted on o 'B r f a ’ . " That belng based o Vevold cf any f submlss10n 3. At t the applicant thls Hon'ble , espondents 1 ccordance w; ulons issued Vlde Ann.A/'7 & A/l. 2 Trlbunal. flee answerlng respondents are \ V submittino the true facts neEore the Bon‘ble Lrlbunal. it :Ls submttec that appllcant was earller transferred 1n the year 1985 from Rohansa. to Slmga vide order dt. 11/6/85. Copy of the same is annexed herew1th as A ANEEXURE R/l. Thereafter lookxng to the admnlstratlve ex1genCles,the them C.M.O. modlfled tne oreer whereby apn11Cant has been Emm wlthln the $1mga Block 1n Sector £> ¥t C. named Sohela. The applicant has carrie cut the order and JOlned at Sohela. ‘ 4x s It ls further submltted that while the apple. m was postee at $ohela, ~<§ne crmlnal case has been the applicant has filed the instant , or issuance of a élrectlon that the’c M. r.) canalder his representatlcns w‘uch were v I 29/6/96, 2/7/96 ana 30/7/96 m the llght ‘ f Annexure A/7 and also in the llght of Annexare A/l. y the instant petition, he has further prayed that the“ to 3 be dlrected to deal C M.O) Ralpur ln th law for not complying w1th the instruc— the entire appllcatlon of the a‘opllcg n mlsconcelved 5c rusleadlng facts ls totally substance as woula be clear from perusal‘ s made herelnbelow. V , _ ¥ he has out—set not mentloned answering materlal respondents facts sub begi% hat V 1 :f a R ‘ d d " a . ‘ ’ BEFORE mpmgé; STATEV-VADmNxSTRATxW TRIBUNAL: 5% I l r ‘ I k’V 0.A.No.3276;/V96f ; ’ " L ’>,API{L3:CANT‘ ’: ' AJC. Philip I, r—v/sf- Vothersvv RESmNDENTs \ : statekqjz m9; & Petétiongr versus Resgondents Present : None appears for the petitionef. Mr. V.V.S. Moorthy, Deputy Advocate Genera! with Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Government Advocate for the State. ORDER 2. Thus, the writ petition is dismissed as having become jnfructuous. No order as to costs. L Satish K. Agnihotri Sdl- Judge r HIGH COURT OF CgHATTtSGARH AT BILASPUR W SINGLE BENCH : HON’BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI J. WRIT PETITION (SI NO 1436 OF 2005 Adison Kumar Phillie The State of M.P, and others (Passed on 9’” Day of March. 2007) 1. By this petition. the petitioner chailenges the validity of the transfer order dated 25-54996 (Annexure A—1). With the passage of time, the writ petition has become infructuous, to which teamed couneei ’ appearing for the Stater‘respondents has no objection.