1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. MCA (review) No. 12/2008 in WP No. 6080/2006 (decided) Sudhir s/o Haribhau Pohankar Vs. State of Mah. and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM : A.P. LAVANDE AND R. V. MORE, JJ. DATED : 8th February, 2008 Heard Mr. Bhandarkar, learned counsel for the applicant. Misc. Civil Application is filed for review of order dated 27.8.2007 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 6080/2006. The aforesaid writ petition was filed by the applicant challenging the order of caste Scrutiny Committee, the respondent no.3, validating caste claim of respondent no.4, that he belongs to “Vanjari” caste. Mr. Bhandarkar, learned counsel for the applicant made two fold submissions viz., firstly while disposing of aforesaid writ petition, this Court did not consider the documents annexed to the petition, and secondly the documents filed by respondent 2 no.4 were considered and certificate is given to him that he belongs to “Vanjari Caste”. As far as first ground of objection that the documents annexed to the petition have not considered is concerned, in our opinion, the same cannot be a ground to review the order dated 27.8.2007. The second ground of objection that while disposing of the writ petition documents filed by respondent no.4 came to be considered and this Court granted certificate to respondent no.4 that he belongs to Vanjari caste is concerned, we do not see any merit inasmuch as the documents by respondent no.4 were considered to support our conclusion. In that view of the matter, we do not find any substance in the application. Hence, the application is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE MLA