IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 15789/2008 Decided on:22.6.2011 _____________________________________________ Piar Chand. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. Aman Deep Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Vikas Rathore, Dy. A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. _____________________________________________________ Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Petitioner has completed 8 years’ continuous service with effect from 1994 till 2002 with 240 days in a block of 12 calendar months. However, his services have been regularized with effect from 23.12.2006. Since the petitioner has already completed 8 years’ continuous service with 240 days in each calendar year upto 2002, his case is required to be considered for regularization in 2002 as per the judgment dated 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 28.7.2010 rendered by this Court in Rakesh Kumar vs. State of H.P. and others, CWP No. 2735 of 2010 and other connected matters, instead of 23.12.2006. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization strictly in view of the principles laid down in the judgment cited hereinabove, with all the consequential benefits, within a period of 10 weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. 22.6.2011 *awasthi*