CWP No.12225 of 2000 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.12225 of 2000 (O&M) Date of Decision: 04.07.2011 The Samalkha Motor Union (Regd.) and another ... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present: None for the petitioners. Ms. Shruti Jain, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana for respondents No.1 to 4. None for respondents No.5 to 14. ***** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? NO 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? NO 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? NO K. KANNAN, J. (Oral) 1. The petition is to prohibit unlawful activities of tractor-trolley owners from running the vehicles without permit as required under the Motor Vehicles Act. There is no need for a direction that the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act are applied. Although complaint is made that respondents No.5 to 14 are operating trolleys without permits, the State has filed reply stating that after the filing of the writ petition they swung into action and wherever it is found that any tractor-trolley was used without permit as required under the Motor Vehicles Act, action was being taken against the violators of the law. The petitioners are not present before this Court to substantiate the contention that there has been laxity on the part of the State in CWP No.12225 of 2000 (O&M) [2] enforcing the law. The State counsel, who is present in Court, stated that all violations are being properly tracked and the action is taken in accordance with law. 2. I do not find any scope for any direction in such circumstances. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed. JULY 04, 2011 ( K. KANNAN ) Rajan JUDGE