IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 8147 of 2004 Between: Mohd Taher S/o Modh. Yakub R/o 8-3-228/1063, Rahamathnagar, Yousufguda, Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House Officer,Jubleehills Police Station, Hyderabad 2 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in interfereing in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the petitioenr wife smt. Farhana Begum and her parents as illegal and arbitrary and further direct the 1st respondent not to interfere further in the said dispute and further direct the 2nd respondent to enquire into thepetitioner complaint dt 24-4-2004 Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.RAJA REDDY KONETI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 8147 of 2004 ORDER: No representation for the petitioner as well as the respondent. 2. This writ petition is filed seeking a direction by way of Mandamus to declare the action of the first respondent in interfering with the dispute between the petitioner and his wife Smt. Farhana Begum as illegal and arbitrary. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that he married the daughter of one Shaik Murtuza as she fell in love with him. It is stated that though the petitioner legally married the daughter of Shaik Murtuza, she left his company at the instance of his father, who was objecting to her marriage with the petitioner. It is the grievance of the petitioner that though the first respondent is nothing to do with the dispute between himself and his wife, at the instance of his father-in-law, the first respondent is harassing the petitioner. 4. While admitting the writ petition, this Court, by order dated 28.04.2004, passed interim orders, directing the first respondent not to interfere with the dispute of the petitioner with his wife. The said interim order continued till now and there is also no counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents. 5. Therefore, in the absence of any counter affidavit, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents not to interfere with the personal rights of the petitioner with regard to the plea of his marriage with Smt. Farhana Begum. It is, however, made clear that if any complaint is filed against the petitioner, it is open for the respondents to take steps in accordance with law. 6. Subject to the above observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 08.06.2009 Msr/KL HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.8147 of 2004 08.06.2009 (Msr)