T "^ c^y \^ <tmeir (t>ii<n 3^ '^TRRra, ®fll'M'l<B,fsiMl'My ^<^fc.:..^....^.........^ ,,^ sn^r 'TW C^ii^^[t?) SII^I W h-U* (WTsqi^T^ri^ TOiWl ^itef an^r Petitloaer ;ractii Najmmi about Govenu Chhattii Tahsa Champ; pingh, S/o. Shri Chhedu Singh, aged |47 ycars, Ex-Constabk No. 124, (icnt Railway Polue Raipur, [garh, aad R/o. Vffllage Pharaswani, |and P.S. Dabra, District Jaajgir- 1 (CG) Versus Respoadent Raikumar Shri Supcrinj Govenujient Raipur, Dewangaa, tcndcnt of PoUcc, RaUway Police, |Chhattisgarh. Present- Shri R. Paadey, counsel fo Shri Paiikaj Shrivastava, 8.B. Hoa'ble Shri DIiirendra Milshra. J 17.9.2008 In view of reply filed by stated that representation for decided by the respondent on 2(2. by thls Court for the above pur^ose prefer appeal as per Rule 24 Confa-ol aad Appeal) Rules, 1966| as the respondent was not clear fhat fhere has been subsllauti bv fhis Court. <ftrtf<'i4ti ffp^ ^^^ <I^ilt^i< ^sfRlHan^r the petitioner. c^itascl for thc rcspondcnt |fhe respondeut, whereia it has been (re-employment of the petitioner was i.2.2004 wcU withia the tune aUowed aad the petitioncr was directed to of the Civfl Services (Classification, and para 259 ofthe Po&e Regulation, to re-employ the petitiouer, it is lautial compliance of the order passed comj)etent ?I ^T ?t^ ^t))t^-i<, ?i^-ii^ii^ —F&as^--^"-:;- - -. ^^':^rai^I?T, afll'M'is, [qCTyy tirawsRtnsR """" """""""""^ 200 ^ S^V '^V ('jqt^i'i'T) 3^1 W St-U'h ^rar^f^i shHtci> TRIIW flftff SII^I tbfe In fhese circ;um.slances. out a case for iaitiation of respondent. Accordingly, the dropped. +l^[<'l^i1T1 •tn'R^ff ^f ^%l <Fq'^i< ^affiCTsil^l petitioner has not beea able to make conteinpt proceedings ^ainst the contempt procceduigs are hereby Sd/- DUrendraMishra Judge