IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14676 of 2008 HARENDRA MANJHI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 14.05.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner apprehends arrest in Baniapur P.S. Case No. 91/07under sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379,504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. According to the F.I.R., there was altercation between the parties on the question of plucking KATAHAL fruit from informant’s tree. This led to hot argument and thereafter the so-called assault by Farsa etc. The above case thereafter came to be instituted on the statement made by the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present case is a fall out of an earlier complaint case which was filed by this petitioner against the informants and some other persons. He further submits that the injury report does not substantiate the allegation in the F.I.R. about the nature of injury as such. It does not match the description of assault. Looking at the above facts, in the event of his arrest/surrender within four weeks from today, let the petitioner namely Harendra Manjhi, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chapra (Saran) in connection with Baniapur P.S. Case No. 91/2007 subject to conditions under section 438(II) of the Cr.P.C. Rajeev/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)