SfNGlE BEHM \ c,?.^3-' ^" @ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CG) WRIT PETITION N0 . 143) /2005 PETITIONER ,^ Z^.1 ->zfc!-'$&f .^^^ H^ RESPONDENTS 1. 2. Raiaesh Ghosle, son of Shri Phalit Raia Ghosale, aged about Q3_ years, village Belsari, Post Belsari^ Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Bilaspur (C.G.) The Principle, Polytechnic College, Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.GJ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, •-^' »! HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILA8PUR WRn'PETITIONNo. 1431 of2005 PETmONER : RameshGhosle. RESPONDENTS VERSUS : The Presidmg Officer, Labour Court, Bilaspur & another. WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITOTION OF INDIA SB: Hon^ble Shri Satish K. Aenfliotri, J. Present: Shi'i Rajeev Stovastava, Advocate with Shri Malay Shriv^stava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Govemment Advocate for the State/respondent No. 2. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 08U1 day of Apni, 2010) 1. Leamed counsel appearing tbr the petitioner submits fhat m light ofthe / decision ofthis Court in M/s. Radius Corporation Limited \\ Manish Sharma &0thers ,iM^ petition is not maintamable, thus, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition. However, the petitioner may be granted liberty to talce recourse to other altemative fomm seeking redressal ofhis grievances. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side has no objection. 3. It is ordered accordingly. 4. Consequently, the vvrit petition is dismissed as vvithdrawn with the aforestated liberty, ifso advised. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 W.P. No. 806 of2004 decided on 28.03.2009