IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27859 of 2010 PRADEEP SINGH @ PRADEEP KUMAR SINGH, SON OF DEODHARI SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that initially the petitioner was the Informant for the murder of his sister-in-law in which he suspected one Sumant Kumar Chandravanshi, because his driving license found at the place of occurrence. Subsequently, the petitioner was suspected to be involved by the family members of the deceased. Considering that there is no eye witness to the occurrence and the entire case against the petitioner is only on suspicion, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in Rohtas P.S. Case No. 08 of 2010, G.R. Case No. 242 of 2010 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any 2 change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)