IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 26TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 4TH ASWINA 1930 RP.No. 989 of 2008() -------------------- REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- MOHAMMED HUSSAIN, S/O.ABUBECKER, 65 YEARS, PROPRITOR, KERALA TRADING COMPANY, VRINDAVASN LANE, CHALAI, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.ABRAHAM MATHEW (VETTOOR) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, TRIVANDRUM. 2. ADDL.SALES TAX OFFICER, 2ND CIRCLE, TRIVANDRUM. 3. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE VANCHIYOOR, TRIVANDRUM. 4. TAHSILDAR, (RR), TALUK OFFICE, TRIVANDRUM. BY G.P. SRI.TEKCHAND THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ALONG WITH R.P. NO.1037/2008 ON 26/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. .................................................................... R.P. Nos.989 of 2008 in O.P. No.35706 of 2000 & R.P. No.1037 of 2008 in O.P. No.16669 of 2001 .................................................................... Dated this the 26th day of September, 2008. ORDER Review Petitions are filed stating that particulars of the C Forms referred to in the judgment are not correct. When O.Ps. were disposed of, this court had not verified any C Forms and therefore, in review petition there is no scope for verifying particulars of C Forms issued by the petitioner to the supplier. Accordingly, I do not find any ground to interfere with the judgment in review proceedings. Review Petitions are consequently dismissed. However, the judgment does not bar the petitioner claiming benefit under the amnesty scheme. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge pms