IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39879 of 2008 1. VIRENDRA PRASAD SINGH @ VIRENDRA SINGH S/o- Late Deonarayan Singh 2. Sujit Kumar Singh @ Sudist Kumar Singh S/o- Virendra Prasad Singh Both resident of village-Tengrahan, P.S.-Meenapur District - Muzaffarpur Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 08.12.2008 Heard the parties. Petitioners are accused in a case for the offence registered under Sections 379, 341, 323, 504/34 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. It is submitted that the specific allegation has been found against the petitioner no. 1, Virendra Prasad Singh @ Virendra Singh. As a matter of fact, on account of payment of repairing charge, there was Marpit took place upon which petitioner no. 2, sustained injury. It is further submitted that the allegation of firing is absolutely vague. Learned counsel for the State is not in a position to refute the submissions made on behalf of the petitioners. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions as made above, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner no. 2, Sujit Kumar Singh @ Sudist Kumar Singh be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount - 2 - each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Meenapur P.S. Case No. 52 of 2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. So far as petitioner no.1, Virendra Prasad Singh @ Virendra Singh is concerned, considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail on behalf of the petitioner is rejected. Jagdish (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)