1/ HIGH coURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILAsPUR W.P. 1s} No.4255/2oo7 PETITIONER Ramji Sahu S/o Firtu, age 59 years, Permanent Gangman W.R.D. — Working undm‘ S.D.O. Maniyari WRD-Sub Division, Mungeli, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretaly, Water Resources Deptt. Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan-Raipur (C.G.) 2. Sub Divisional O$cer, Maniyari, i WRD-Sub Division Mungeli, District Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Shri Sameer Sahu, Counsel for the petitioner. Shn' N.K. Agrawal, Senior Advocate and Deputy Advocate General with Shri A.S. KachhWaha, Govt. Advocate for the State] respondents. ORAL ORDER (31.10.2007) sum, KUMAR smHA, J. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a permanent Gang—man is to be rem-ed at the age of 62 yeals in accordance with the Chhattisgarh Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivarshiki-Ayu) Adhiniyam 1967 read with Fundamental Rules, 56. He also submits that the point raised has been decided by this Court in batch of matters i.e. W.P. No. 108/ 2005 and many other connected matters on 04.01.2007, reported in 2007 (2) C.G.L.J. 29 (Gavind & Others vs. State of C.G. am? others) and this matter is squarely covered by that decision, which may be disposed of on the same terms. Learned counsel for the State fairly agrees that this matter is covered by the said decision. However, he submits that in some matters the State has hled writ appeals. 2 w.P. (S) No.4255/2007 Unless some intcrim order is passed, merely on account of ming of the writ appeal, hearing of this writ petition cannot be kept in abeyance, when the matter is squarely'covered by the said judgment. In the result, this petition is allowed. It is disposed of in terms of the order dated 04.01.2007 passed in W.P. No.108/2005 and other connected matters. No order as to cost. Sd/- \ Sunil Kumar Sinha i Judge i