IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.494 OF 2008 Anil Gulabdas Shah & Ors. .... Appellants Vs. Ashram Tiwari (since deceased) .... Respondents thourh Lrs. Mrs. Kalavati Ashram Tiwari & Ors. Mr. Anil G. Shah Appellant present in person. Mr. Pravin Samdhani with Mr. Pratik Seksaria and Abhishek Sawant i/by M/s Wadia Gandy and Co. Advocate for respondents. Coram : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J Date : 25th August, 2008 P.C. 1. This Appeal from Order is preferred to challenge the order dated 23rd January 2008 to the extent to which it dismisses the appellants Notice of Motion No.257 of 2007. By the said order, the learned Bombay City Civil and Sessions Court disposed of four Notices of Motion taken out by the appellants i.e. Notice of Motion No.256 of 2007, Notice of Motion No.257 of 2007, Notice of Motion No.258 of 2007, Notice of Motion No.883 of 2007 and report of the Court Commissioner. By the Notice of Motion No.257 of 2007, the appellants sought four reliefs. The first three are concerning investigation into the allegations of corruption in the office of the Court Receiver and the (2) last relief at prayer (d) is for rejection of report of the Court Receiver. When it was pointed out to appellant No.2 who appears in person that prayers (a), (b) and ( c ) of the Notice of Motion are beyond the purview of the suit, he has not pressed the same before this Court. As regards the rejection of the report of the Court Receiver, the order passed has been in favour of the appellants in as much as the Court has refused to discharge the Court Receiver from his liability. Therefore, there is nothing for consideration of the Court in the instant Appeal from Order. 2. The Appeal from Order is accordingly disposed of. (SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J)