1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7521 OF 2008 Shekhar s/o Ramesh Choudhari Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.A.B.Girase, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.D.R.Kale, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 to 5. Mr.D.S.Bagul, advocate holding for Mr.N.L.Chaudhari, advocate for Respondents No.7 to 13. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 17th November, 2009. P.C.: 1 Petitioner is raising exception to the orders in respect of recording mutation entries in favour of the Respondents. 2 It is stated that the petitioner has agreed to purchase the property in dispute from the original owner, however, instead of honouring the agreement of sale executed in favour of the petitioner, original owner has alienated said property in favour of Respondent No.7. 3 Petitioner has already presented Regular Civil Suit No.162/2006 claiming decree of specific performance of agreement. Petitioner has also joined the subsequent purchaser as party defendant to the suit. In these circumstances, the revenue entries recorded in favour of subsequent purchaser would always be subject to the final outcome of the litigation 2 pending before the Civil Court in the shape of Regular Civil Suit No.162/2006. 4 In the facts and circumstances of this case, no interference is called for in exercise of powers conferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 5 Writ Petition stands rejected. (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE ******* adb/wp752108