IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4288 of 2009 Makeshwar Nath Singh S/O Late Badri Narayan Singh R/O Vill- Umda, P.S Chapra Muffasil, P.O Akuli, Distt- Saran (Chapra) ……………. Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Shri Sidheshwar Prasad The Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Near Rajapur Pool, Patna 3. Sri Om Prakash Shukla The Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Borad, Near Rjapur Pool, Patna …………. Opp.Parties ---------------------------------- 5. 19/10/2011 Writ application of the petitioner was disposed of by a common order dated 26.9.2008 passed in a batch of cases. Petitioner finding the same having not been complied with filed this contempt application. In this contempt application, he specifically mentioned about G.P.F. Amount with statutory interest as having not been paid to him in compliance to the said order. This Court was not satisfied with the first show cause filed by the opposite parties and therefore by order dated 8.9.2011 a proceeding of contempt was initiated against opposite party no.2 and 3. In compliance to the said order, opposite party nos.2 and 3 are present in Court. They have filed their further show cause. Learned counsel for the opposite 2 parties submits that in the contempt application petitioner had not raised any grievance in respect of any other dues under any head except dues of G.P.F. with statutory interest. However, opposite party nos.2 and 3 themselves examined the entitlement of the petitioner under different heads and an amount of Rs.22,280/- which was found due to him towards D.A. is being paid to the petitioner through crossed cheque which has been handed over to learned counsel for the petitioner today. With regard to the amount of G.P.F. with statutory interest, learned counsel for the petitioner does not submit that the same is still due. In the circumstances, this Court is satisfied with the show cause filed by opposite party nos.2 and 3 today and therefore does not find any contempt made out against them. The proceeding is, therefore, dropped, Opposite party nos.2 and 3 are discharged from the rule issued against them and this MJC application is dismissed. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)