IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31975 of 2010 DEVENDRA SINGH, S/o Late Sukhdeo Singh. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 27.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 272, 273 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 47, 48, 51 and 58 of the Excise Act. It has been submitted that the allegation is that four miscreants including the petitioner were seen running away abandoning the car in which liquor was recovered. Considering that the recovery was not from the conscious possession of the petitioner and the petitioner’s brother-in-law undertakes responsibility for the petitioner’s conduct after his release from jail custody, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Mohammadpur P.S. Case No. 43 of 2010 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving 2 genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the brother-in-law of the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)