1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 6 OF 2007 ( M/s. Gotey Engineers vs. Arvindkumar Balaji Mohitkar ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. SEPTEMBER 01, 2008. Heard Shri Pande, Advocate for the petitioner, Shri Ghate, Advocate for respondent No.1 and Shri Tathod, Advocate for respondents No. 2 to 4. Shri Pande, Advocate has filed a pursis signed by the petitioner and himself, stating that the amount due to him has been received from the Bank by the petitioner and as such this Court may pass appropriate orders in the Contempt Petition. After hearing respective counsel, I find that on 7.6.2006 itself, sale proceeds were received by Respondent No.1 Bank and on 12.7.2006 this fact was not brought to the notice of this Court when it disposed of writ petition finally. It appears that after this order, on 31.10.2006 the present Contempt Petitioner has placed his grievance before Respondent No.1, however, Respondent No.1 has not taken any steps 2 to point out the error though such error needed to be pointed out to this Court at the earliest. There is absolutely no explanation by Respondent No.1 for not taking suitable steps to place correct facts on record. Even in present Contempt Petition, why such steps were not taken, is not being pointed out. Considering the fact that the grievance of the petitioner is already ventilated, I only warn that if in future such type of conduct is noticed, stern action will be taken against Respondent No.1 or the Bank represented by him. With this warning, Contempt Petition is disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.