1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16 OF 2006 IN FCA NO.85 OF 2003 Meghna Sanjeev Ranade ...... Appellant. V/s Sanjeev Venkatesh Ranade ..... Respondent And Suvarna Sahakari Bank Ltd. .... Applicants. ---- Mr. M.D. Angal for the original appellant. Mr. A.V. Aturkar for the respondent. Mr. R.V. Govilkar for the applicant. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH & V.M. KANADE, JJ. DATE : 15 th January, 2008. P.C.: 1. This Civil Application is taken out by the Bank. If the Bank has any dues to be recovered from the respondent, their remedy is to proceed in the appropriate Court of law. These proceedings cannot be the remedy for the Bank. Civil Application is disposed of. 2. It is needless to say that if the Bank has any claim against the respondent, it can adopt remedies that may be available to it in law. The appellant - wife is also free to 2 adopt her remedy to execute the order of maintenance which is in her favour. It is common ground that the order granting maintenance to the wife has not been stayed by this Court. Therefore the appellant - wife is also free to take steps to execute the order in accordance with law. All interim orders that may have been passed by this Court in this Civil Application are vacated. 3. Civil Application is disposed of. (D.K. DESHMUKH, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.) 3