IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1199 of 1988 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- REKHI ROADLINES PVT. LTD Versus CHANDRAKANT ALIAS BABABHAI JESINGBHAI, DECD. THRO:HEIRS -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR AMAR D MITHANI for MR PM RAVAL for Petitioner No. 1 MR ASHWIN L SHAH for Respondents No. 1/1-9 MR ASHOK L SHAH for Respondents No. 10 RULE UNSERVED for Respondents No. 11 SERVED BY AFFIX.(N) for Respondents No. 13-14 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Date of decision: 16/01/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT The learned counsel for the parties have put in consent terms which are signed by themselves, a Director of the petitioner company and the respondent no.2. The petitioner has agreed to hand over possession of the premises to the respondents and the other terms are set out in the consent terms. The learned counsel for the petitioner has just now handed over the keys of the premises to the learned counsel for the respondents in the court. The consent terms are taken on record. In accordance with the consent terms, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn with no order as to costs. Rule discharged. Interim relief stands vacated. ******* hki