IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN MONDAY, THE 13TH OCTOBER 2008 / 21ST ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 28469 of 2008(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SARASWATHY, ASSISTANT MANAGER, KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION, TALUK DEPOT, MAVELIKARA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.RAJASEKHARAN PILLAI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION, MAVELI BHAVAN, GANDHI NAGAR, COCHIN, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION, ERNAKULAM. ADV. SRI.LAKSHMI NARAYAN, SC, SUPPLYCO FOR R1 & R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.28469 of 2008 ------------------------------- Dated this the 13th October, 2008. J U D G M E N T This writ petition was filed apprehending petitioner's transfer from the Depot of Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited at Mavelikara to Nedumkandam. 2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the first respondent has filed a statement dated 13.10.2008 and produced along with it a copy of the proceedings dated 3.10.2008 issued by the Chairman and Managing Director of the Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, whereby the order by passed him on 28.2.2007 transferring the petitioner to Chengannur has been cancelled and she has been reposted to Mavelikara on compassionate grounds. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the first respondent submits that in this view of the matter, nothing survives to be adjudicated upon in this writ petition. Per contra, W.P.(C) No.28469 of 2008 2 Sri.R. Rajasekharan Pillai, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that Ext.R1(2) adversely affects the petitioner in so far as it relates to her service conditions and leaving open the right of the petitioner to challenge Ext.R1(2) proceedings dated 3.10.2008 in other appropriate proceedings, this writ petition may be closed. Having regard to the submissions made at the Bar, this Writ Petition is closed reserving liberty with the petitioner to challenge Ext.R1(2) proceedings in other appropriate proceedings, if she is aggrieved thereby. P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE nj.