^ o SEWffN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S) No. / 2010 PETITIONER Smt. Pushpa Ramteke W/o Late Shri Promod Rateke, Aged about 45 years, Occupation - Principal Govt. H. Secondary School Bhatagaon (R) Distt. Durg (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS 0<y^€- (^^y .seS'^\,>\y.-1 :y <^< ^•'^3 ..-^ 1.' State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ."• 2. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer District Durg (CG) &*^'s^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA I-HC-22 •^sf ^\M\v\^, ^fllwiG. faciwy Ni+tdi <5^><n^» 3'n^r xisrg? _.....W:.Ba>J.S(°^^ "WI. 21 Isre^sr' sn^i^i R-ii.'fl 311^1 sh*<|sb ^fta 311^1 TOnWHft? • i.irfTkiBi'stn>t ics*- njtt» - vyyci'pfr^'t? i»E»a'«v*t Shri Vipin Tiwari, counsel for th Shri Ajit Singh, P.L. for the Stat. aftdr Counsel for the petitioner entitled to benefit of two advance having passed B.Ed. examination cost. It is submitted that the issue im no longer res integra and the same Hont)le Supreme Court in the case of SE Ors. 2009 (III)MPJR (SC) 89. silbmits that the petitioner is iticrements on account of she her appointment at her own toived in the present petition is been finally decided by the Astia Saxena V». State of M.P. hlas It is further submitted that thisl view in its order dated 6.2.2009 pass Counsel for the oetitioner turther d> 29.4.2010 passed in Writ Appeal upon the judgment of the Supreme (supra) and the order passed by this 87/2009, directions have been issued grant of two advance increments as| issued by the State of Madhya Prades|h pleaded in the petition. Counsel for the State submit! would also be considered on the same In view of above, the petition is| the respondent authorities to decide grant of troo advance inerements as| ^il4f^4lT 'RTR^ff ^ t^St' ^fflR^K ^; aipa*! ail^r petitioner. Court has also taken a similar ,ed in W.P.(S) No. 6257/2008. ubmits that the order dated 124/2009, wherein reiyinj in the case of Asha Saxeaa in another Writ Appeal No. 'or consideration of the case for oer cireular dated 21.9.1974 i, after verification of the facts N0. Ccjurt Cburt i that case of the petitioners ines. disposed of with a direction to the claim of the petitioner for per circular dated 21.9.1974 ! •AA e-fjg-, ;5—U-"S«-^ ^A"^ t l%ter-s^>?a-BC-22 '"'^ i1-1 f:< f-' ~S:3t •^m^Pf, •S^r!S. factl^y •"a . 'e^y ~sE;^'ri^it'r' 3'n'^r xnrg? HWWI Stitllcb 'TFi, 200 •fq^sr- ail^l^il h'tt'h 3VSS stiwti ^tlta 3D^[ ^gRR ^rfSa Pradesh perickl issued by the State of Madhya pleaded in the petition within a peri4d It is rnade clear that this Cou|~t on merits of the case and the autho^ity to decide the same strictiy in accorddnce 4]ilfi'l'iil-) ^Fraf 4f^S <Ri|tdK ^T 3(PgtI 3)1^1 after verification of the facts of eight weeks from today. has not expressed any opinion concemed would be at Uberty with laie._ Sd/- pritinker Diwakar Judge f'ftA -^f?7TJ