IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.13034 of 2010 Date of decision: 25.11.2010 Lal Chand ...... Petitioner versus The State of Haryana and others ...... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI Present: Mr.Sanjay Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.R.S.Kundu, Addl. A.G. Haryana. PERMOD KOHLI, J. (ORAL) Copy of the C.M. No.13209 of 2010 has been placed on record after procuring the same from the learned counsel for the applicant. Notice of this application has already been received by other side. Mr.R.S.Kundu, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, who had appeared in the main case disposed of vide order dated 27th July, 2010, submits that he has no objection if the application is allowed. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have perused the record. The applicant seeks correction in the order dated 27th July, 2010, where the reference is made to Municipal Committee, Karnal. It is stated that in fact it is Municipal Committee, Shahabad, District Kurukshetra, however, due to inadvertent errors, it has been mentioned as Municipal Council, Karnal, in first page of the order dated 27th July, 2010. From the perusal of the record of the writ petition also, it appears that Municipal Committee, Shahabad, District Kurukshetra is party respondent. Due to inadvertent mistake name Civil Writ Petition No.13034 of 2010 -2- of Municipal Committee, Karnal, has been recorded in the order. This application is accordingly allowed. In first page of the order dated 27th July, 2010, the Municipal Committee, Karnal shall be read as Municipal Committee, Shahabad, District Kurukshetra. Registry to make necessary correction in the aforesaid order. (PERMOD KOHLI) November 25, 2010 JUDGE P.seth