MC 3270/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE U.B.SAHA Heard Mr.A.M.Buzarbaruah, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. G.C.Phukan, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party respondent No.2. The instant application has been by the appellant-Oil India Limi ted seeking a clarification of this Court’s order dated 06.08.2010 passed in MC 1619/2010 (in LA Appeal No.3/2010) wherein this Court while passing the aforesai d order granted liberty to the respondents therein to withdraw the amount of 50% by filing appropriate application before this Court. The learned counsel appear ing for the appellant submits that this Court has not clearly stated that the ap propriate application has to be filed in the judicial side of this Court and the Registry may interpret the order of this Court that the respondents are at libe rty to withdraw the amount by filing an application in the administrative side o f this Court. According to this Court, while in the order itself it is stated that app ropriate application before this Court which means the application in the judici al side and not in the administrative side. Therefore, no further clarification is called for. Mr.Goswami, learned counsel for the opposite party respondent No.2 submi ts that the Respondent No.2 has filed one misc. application objecting the prayer for clarification of the appellant. As the Court passed this order after hearin g all the parties, Registry need not list such misc. application filed by the Re spondent No.2 and the said misc. application has also be treated as disposed of . Misc. application stands disposed of.