IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26229 of 2008 LADDU MAIN Versus STATE OF BIHAR - - - - 2. 7.7.2008 Heard. The Case is under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code and the renewal prayer is after having made two unsuccessful attempts as may appear from Annexure-1 series. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. as being identified as a person who had relieved the informant of his motorcycle and a celluler phone. The contention is that in spite of the petitioner being in custody the trial has not really taken off and the charges being framed on 24.5. 2007, no witness has yet been examined. This is really stressing situation for this Court that in spite of having initiated the trial proceeding by framing charges, the learned Magistrate, who is seized with the file has not been successful in getting a single witness produced before him. I set down a timeframe of nine months from the date of receipt of a copy of the 2 present order foe concluding the trial, else, the petitioner shall be released on bail on his furnishing a bond to the satisfaction of the concerned Magistrate, i.e., Shri T.P.Singh, Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Bettiah, in Sathi P.S.Case No. 107 of 2006, G.R. No. 2589 of 2006 before whom the case is presently pending. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)