IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38196 of 2009 KANCHAN KUMAR JHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 30.11.2009 Heard both sides. Sole petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted under diverse Sections of the Penal Code including Sections 409 and 420 of the Penal Code. The D.S.E. of the District lodged the present F.I.R. alleging therein that at the time of counselling the petitioner produced a certificate of being physical trained teacher of a prominent institute which was subsequently found to be fake and forged. It is submitted that the petitioner was not afforded any opportunity to explain before lodging the F.I.R. It is next submitted that a writ has already been filed by the petitioner questioning his termination. This Court finds from the impugned order that in course of investigation materials have been collected which support the allegation. In that view of the matter, this Court is not persuaded to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Let petitioner surrender before the Court below and apply for regular bail which shall be considered and disposed of by the Court below on its own merit having regard to the 2 materials on record uninfluenced by the present order passed by this Court in the present proceeding. With this observation, the application stands disposed of. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)