IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY RDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION RDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION RDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.342 OF 2002 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.342 OF 2002 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.342 OF 2002 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.2905 OF 2001 WRIT PETITION NO.2905 OF 2001 WRIT PETITION NO.2905 OF 2001 Manubhai Paragji Vashi ..Petitioner versus Union of India & Others ..Respondents Mr.M.A.Vashi, Petitioner in person present. Mr.D.A.Dubey i/b.T.C.Kaushik for the Respondent No.1. Mr.R.A.Rodriques for the Respondent No.3. Coram : F.I.Rebello & Coram : F.I.Rebello & Coram : F.I.Rebello & S.R.Sathe, JJ. S.R.Sathe, JJ. S.R.Sathe, JJ. Dated : 8th Sept, 2006 Dated : 8th Sept, 2006 Dated : 8th Sept, 2006 P.C. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. The prayer clause as prayed in the motion cannot be considered at this stage. All those issues will come up for consideration when the petition itself will be heard and finally disposed off. 2. Considering the above the facts, the notice of motion is disposed of. (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (S.R.SATHE, J.)