^si T<II<IIWII,yal'y'IS, MMiyy.? IMCTI a»*ii<n sn^i'q^T ('ft^i^) sf^n ^ii Ri-ii* Wff 3TI^T si*iiqi (Sinale Bench: Hon'ble ;Writ Petition under Ari-icie fiopi Teac Schc -\ i. 2. 15-1-2009:- Shri Somkant Verma, counsel Shri Arun Sao, 6ovt. Advoca'l iy the instont petition und India, the petitioner seeks a dir^ reguiar pay-scale and seniorit/ fr aiong with arrears and interests ir] *l<li?l<i)'t tllHcii'ifft^t <R|«(K ^? sifim sii^?! ition (S) 204/2009 226 of the Constitution of India) Ram Jangode, 096 about 47 years, Asst. her, S/o Shri H.R. Jangads, 6ovt. Primary iol Boktar-a, Block- Abhanpur District- jr (C6) State Sovt. of ChhattiS9arh, through the Secretary Education Department, &.K.S. Shawan, Distt. Raipur C(6) Oistt. Education Officer, Raipur, Distt- ?aipur (C6) Btock Sducation Officer, Abhanpur, &istt. - !aipur(CS) rreasury, Account <& Psnsion Raipur, bistt. ?aipur(C6) . •for the petitioner: •e for the State. ;r Article 226 of the Constitution of sction to the respondents to pay the. >m the date of his initial appointment the !ight of decision rendered by the ^^•FUIT^^I ^I-.'l-li^lH—FS/95—11/2008—-1,00,000. ,-ff Vi: '<• w:^ \ s ^....--•'ss',, te i-,,^1 a' 'ySj ^|q|<n<4, ®Ti1y<IS,fslCTI'My «iwciia>*«j<i» "Wl 200 3II^iI1R?i' (1?ia'"?:T) an^r ^r (^•ri«6' TI^f ^i^ a)*1(^ 1! IIW tfl^a 'sii^ 1- Kie l^. A/d^ Ifearned State Administrative Tribunal 1745/1989 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 tated 24.8.1992. Learned counsel appearing for 4rder dated 9.10.2006 passed by 'Kakesh Kjmar 5harma and anoiher 4nd in W.P. (5) No. 5474/06 (Jai 4ff</ others) and submits that th^ •tjierefore, the similar order may be he case of the petitioner is Feacher in the School Education t|nfo years with the fixed salary. t|wo years probation, the petitioner •^guiar pay scale from the date of hi; (tuated teachers moyed the State A •^gular pay-scaie, wherein learned lowed the same. The petitloner thesame treatment as he is also sim 'rifwe not paid any heed. , Jabalpur in Original Application No. \3ifiers Vs. State of M.P. and others) macte ^wSci^fl'i tiw<'il" ^S fttsi <rai<4i< ^aiiwisn^i he petitioner placed reiiance on the Court in W.P (S) No. 5473/06 ?. 5tate of Chhattisgarh and others) Baj'pai Vs. State of Chhattisgarh petitioner is similarly situated, pi^ssed. ^that he was appointed as Assistctnt Dep^rtment on probation for a period of Ho<|»ever, later on, after completion of regularized but he was not given initial appointmenT,_Dther similariy ^dministrative Tribunal, Jabalpur for Tlribunal vide order dated 24.8.1992 seyeral representations to accord larly situated, but, the respondents wlas hife to^tV WSPSSll tRHKWT—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000. <£•.- -^ !Siiw?Si* E ^ '^ • .-sV' k~-.^,;M<51' 'T5T'BTplRfiT, ^TftWTS, fiidiyy WidT «»^1I<1» aii^rqii^R; tmi on^^r a>*ii<»> / • an^i'q^? (xpf3^?) TOI1W ^fts 3(1^! -3---1 •*w(c)41-< Tnlraf^ ft^ (l«]«ci< '^'sfRPTSTI^T Leamed counsel for the ijietitioner submits that the petitioner may be'allowed -to make a represer treatment to the petitioner and to other,s.(%jlarly situated teaci Administrative Tribunal dated Zj4.8.1:?92, to which learned counsel for the *<; -<--<A tj&' - iiSpondent/ Sta-i-e has no objec Having hercf learned cou^isel for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of imited prayer made by learned |tation to respondent No.l to give similar same pay-scaie which has been sanctioneci hers on account of the ordsr of the S-idte rion. the case, in the opinion of this Court; the counsel for the petitioner appears to be reasonable. Therefore, the peti^ioner is allowed to make c representation within a period of fwo weeks fr^im today to respondent No.l, raising all his grievances and, in turn, re^pondent No.l shall decide the said representation in an objective rrjanner within a period of 30 days from the iate of receipt of such repre^ raised by the petitioner and tak passed by the iearned Staj iication No.2745/1989. The Writ petition is ac^ordingly disposed of with the aforesaid entation, after cQnskiering all the points ing into account the order dated 24.8.1992 i-e Administrative Tribunal in Originai Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge rtl ^Ri^?^R^PIi^^<l'3!-lt^ll=t—FS/95-—11/2008—1,00,000. A - •^•^