IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 22ND JANUARY 2009 / 2ND MAGHA 1930 RP.No. 71 of 2009(W) -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.23715/2008 Dated 15/10/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY LAW OFFICER, SRI. RANJITH JOSEPH. BY ADV. SRI.K.PRABHAKARAN, SC, K.S.R.T.C. RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SRI. SHERIF HUSAIN, W/O. KHADAR SAHIB, THADAVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, MUSLIM STREET, KOTTARAKARA P.O., PIN 691 506. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.N.SASIDHARAN UNNITHAN GP SMT.LAKSHMI RANI THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/01/2009, ALONG WITH RP.NOS.74/09 & 68/09, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- R.P.Nos.71/2009 in W.P.(C).23715/2008, 74/2009 in W.P.(C).23832/2008 & 68/2009 in W.P.(C).23598/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of January, 2009 ORDER Heard learned counsel for the Review Petitioner Mr.K.Prabhakaran and learned Government Pleader. I make it clear that I have disposed of the writ petitions on merits and not on any concession offered by the learned counsel for the Corporation. I further clarify that the observations made in paragraph 5 of the judgment sought to be reviewed, need not be treated as amounting to any concession offered by the learned counsel for the Corporation. I have affirmed the order passed by the Labour Court, challenged in the writ petitions, on merits. Thereafter, I have granted Corporation four months time to pay the amount awarded by the Labour Court. I find no grounds to review the judgment. Review Petitions are accordingly dismissed. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs