1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. CONTEMPT PETITION NO.71 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1637 OF 2007 Ehtesham Baig ..Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents. .... Mr. A.N. Maniyar for the Petitioner. M. J. Saluja, AGP for the State. .... CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 27th July, 2009. P.C. : The Learned AGP on instructions has stated that there was a substantial break in the service of the Petitioner of approximately 3 years 4 months and 10 days which could not be condoned and that as a result a communication was addressed on 13th March, 2009 to the college. The Petitioner has annexed a copy of the communication at Exhibit C to the Petition. Nonetheless it has been stated that a formal decision shall be communicated to the Petitioner on or before 24th August, 2009. In view 2 of the aforesaid statement that has been made, counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner does not press the Contempt Petition. The Contempt Petition is accordingly disposed of. *****