IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI FRIDAY, THE 3RD JULY 2009 / 12TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(Crl.).No. 239 of 2009(S) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ABBAS KUNJUMON, ORUVIL HOUSE, EYYAL POST, KECHERY VIA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JOSEPH SEBASTIAN PURAYIDAM SMT.MABLE.C.KURIAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERUMAPETTY POLICE STATION, ERUMAPETTY P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, WADAKKANCHERRY POLICE STATION, WADAKKANCHERRY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,THRISSUR, AYYANTHOL POST, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 4. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KERALA STATE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. AJESH,S/O.KOVALAN, PARAKKAL HOUSE, RANDAMKALLU, CHENGALOOR POST, PUTHUKKAD,THRISSUR DISTRICT. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.J.MOHAMMED ANZAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT & M.C.HARIRANI, JJ. * * * * * * * * * * * * * W.P.(Crl).239 No.of 2009 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of July 2009 J U D G M E N T BASANT,J The petitioner has come to this court with this petition for issue of a writ of habeas corpus to search, trace and produce his daughter Amani, a student of the plus two class, who has already crossed the age of 18 years It is alleged that she has been taken away by the 5th respondent. 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits, and the learned Government Pleader endorses the submission, that the alleged detenu Amani was traced by the police and was produced before the learned Magistrate having jurisdiction. Thereafter, after ascertaining the response of the alleged detenu, the learned Magistrate has permitted her to go with the petitioner herein, submits the learned counsel. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in these circumstances, the petitioner does not want to seek any further directions from this court. If anyone has grievance about W.P.Crl.No.239/09 2 the order of the learned Magistrate permitting the alleged detenu to go with the petitioner, it is for such persons to challenge the said direction of the learned Magistrate in accordance with law. 4. In the light of the submission by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, we accept that no further directions are necessary in this writ petition. 5th respondent who has already been served is not present before court. 5. This writ petition is, in these circumstances, dismissed as agreed. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (M.C.HARIRANI, JUDGE) jsr W.P.Crl.No.239/09 3 W.P.Crl.No.239/09 4 R.BASANT & M.C.HARIRANI, JJ. .No. of 200 ORDER/JUDGMENT 18/06/2009