IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 18893 of 2008 Between: K.V.R. Jeevakara Rao S/o. K.Hanumantha Rao R/o.4-45, Dondapadu, Eluru Mandal, West Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND A.P. TRANSO, rep. by Chairman & Managing Director, Corporate Office, Vidyutsoudha, Khairatabad, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not considering the petitioner representation dated 27-3-2008 as illegal, arbitrary and improper and consequently direct the respondent to consider petitioner representation dated 27-3- 2008 granting petitioner increments due from 01-07-1984 to 06-03-1985 and to re-ﬁx my pay scale and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner:MRSN.RAVI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: P.R.BALARAMI REDDY(SC FOR AP TRANSCO) The Court made the following : ORDER Heard both sides. The only grievance of the petitioner is that he is entitled for increments due from 1.7.1984 to 6.3.1985. Though he retired from service, his increments were not sanctioned by the respondents. In fact, the petitioner had made a representation on 27.3.2008 to the respondent ventilating his grievance, but the same is not acted upon till date. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on merits, the respondents are directed to dispose of the representation purported to have been made by the petitioner on 27.3.2008 and pass appropriate orders, as per law and communicate the same to the petitioner. Writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. No costs. __________ 01-09-2008 rkk