IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 22ND SEPTEMBER 2008 / 31ST BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 28089 of 2008(R) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER : ---------------- SUGATHAN K. PANICKER, PROPRIETOR, RACHANA BUILDERS AND ARCHITECTS, RACHANA, PATTANAKKAD, CHERTHALA. BY ADV. SRI.M.A.FIROZ SRI.C.S.ULLAS RESPONDENTS : ------------------- 1. THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORM, ALAPPUZHA. 2. R. RAVEENDRANATHAN, RAM NIVAS,MANNANCHERRY.P.O, MANNANCHERRY, ALAPPUZHA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.N.SUDHA DEVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No. 28089 of 2008 -------------------------- Dated this the 22nd September, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner challenges Exhibits P5, P8 and P9 orders and proceedings of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,Alappuzha. On going through the writ petition as also the orders impugned in this writ petition, I am satisfied that petitioner has a genuine grievance against the orders. Petitioner has an effective alternative remedy against the orders passed by the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Alappuzha before the State Commission under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. In the result, I relegate the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy available to him under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Further proceedings pursuant to Exhibit-P9 shall be kept in abeyance for a period of four months to enable the petitioner to approach the State Commission and to seek appropriate orders. (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma 2 3