THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.21681 of_2006 Dated:18.10.2006 Between Dilip Kumar Mukkawar …..Petitioner and 1.M/s.The Hyderabad Cut Piece Cloth Merchant Association rep., by its Secretary and another. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.21681 of 2006 ORDER: The writ petition in this shape is not maintainable and it is misconceived, since the relief is sought against the 1st respondent, which is the association, functioning in the name and style of M/s. The Hyderabad Cut Piece Cloth Merchant Association represented by its secretary, Hyderabad. The grievance of the petitioner is that pursuant to a paper publication, inviting applications for being admitted as members of the association, the petitioner approached the 1st respondent. Though he paid Rs.100/-, he was not supplied with the application form. Therefore, the present writ petition is filed. 2nd respondent is not a necessary party. Insofar as the 1st respondent is concerned, this writ petition is not maintainable. Neither it is a State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India, nor it has any statutory obligation purported to suppy application form to the petitioner. Writ petition is misconceived and hence, it is dismissed. _________ 18-10-2006 rkk