IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 21260 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: August 23, 2010. Mam Chand and another. ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Haryana ...... RESPONDENT(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. R.S.Budhwar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amandeep Singh, A.A.G., Haryana. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No.126 dated 26.04.2010, under Sections 148/149/323/324/325/326/427/452/332/353/186 IPC, registered at Police Station Pehowa, District Kurukshetra. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. This Court while issuing notice of motion on 29.07.2010 passed the following order:- “Crl.M.No.37643 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRM No.M-21260 of 2010 Crl.M.No.M-21260 of 2010 Argues that initially the petitioners were arrested for offences under Sections 148,149, 323, 353, 427, 452 IPC and offence under Section 326 IPC was added later on. Further argues that injury for offence under Section 326 IPC has not been attributed to the present petitioner. It is further contended that main accused Pritam, Ram Phal, and Purshotam Lal have already been arrested and released on regular bail. Notice of motion for 23.8.2010. However, petitioners are directed to join the investigation and in case they are arrested, they shall be released on interim bail by the Arresting Officer to his satisfaction subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that they have already joined the investigation pursuant to said order dated 29.07.2010. It has also been stated by learned counsel for the State that petitioners have joined the investigation and that they are no more required for any custodial interrogation. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioners are likely to abscond or that they are likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, in view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of Mam Chand and Geeta Ram, is accepted and order dated 29.07.2010 granting interim bail in favour of the petitioner is, hereby, made absolute subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. 2 CRM No.M-21260 of 2010 ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) August 23, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 3