IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN FRIDAY, THE 29TH JULY 2011 / 7TH SRAVANA 1933 RP.No. 1185 of 2009(M) --------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.29966/2009 Dated 09/11/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENTS ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI. T.A. SHAJI, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER ---------------------------------------------- REMY E.K., D/O.E.A. KUNJU MOHAMMED, ETHIYIL HOUSE, SOUTH VAZHAKKULAM, ALUVA - 683 105. BY ADV.SRI.P.K.ABOOBACKER THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/07/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ----------------------------------------- R.P.No.1185 of 2009 W.P(C).No.29966 of 2009 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th July, 2011 O R D E R In this review petition the petitioners seek a review of the judgment delivered by this Court on 9.11.2009 in W.P(C) No.29966 of 2009. By the judgment sought to be reviewed this Court directed the Mahatma Gandhi University to take steps to revalue the answer scripts of the first respondent herein and communicate the result to her within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. The said writ petition was filed on 21.10.2009 and it was disposed of by judgment delivered on 9.11.2009. The petitioner had in the writ petition itself stated that the mark list of the third year B.Sc. degree examination was received by her on 24.9.2009 and the mark list of the final year examination was received by her on 17.8.2009. The applications for revaluation were filed on 30.9.2009 and 24.8.2009 respectively. In the review petition it is stated that the last date for submission of applications for revaluation of the third year examination was 5.8.2009 and for the final year examination was R.P.No.1185 of 2009 -:2:- 17.8.2009. It is also contended that the last date stipulated was notified on 15.7.2009 and 27.7.2009 respectively. The first respondent/writ petitioner has not so far denied or disputed these statements. If that be so this Court has to proceed on the basis that the applications for revaluation were made beyond time. The rules governing revaluation do not empower the University to condone delay in submitting applications for revaluation. I am therefore of the opinion that the review petitioners are entitled to succeed. I accordingly allow this review petition and recall the judgment delivered by me on 9.11.2009 in W.P(C)No.29966 of 2009. The Registry is directed to post the writ petition for hearing as per roster next week. P.N.RAVINDRAN, Judge. ahg. P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. --------------------------- R.P.No.1185 of 2009 W.P(C).No.29966 of 2009 ---------------------------- O R D E R 29th July, 2011