1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.73 OF 2008 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3 OF 2008 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.452 OF 2000 Shri Sharadchandra Ramkrishna Deshmukh : Applicant. Versus M\s.Kuldeep Builders & others : Respondents. Ms.Lalita Panchakshari i/by Shri A.M.Joshi, for the Applicant. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATED : JANUARY 07, 2009 P.C. 1. Heard Ms.Lalita Panchakshari, the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant. By the above Civil Application, the Applicant prays for restoration of the above Contempt Petition No.452 of 2000 which has been dismissed on account of the conditional order dated 3rd October 2008. The Applicant also prays for restoration of the Civil Application No.3 of 2008 which has been dismissed for non- appearance of the advocate of the Applicant on the same date. 2 2. In so far as dismissal of the above Contempt Petition is concerned, the same has been dismissed on account of the self operative order dated 3rd October 2008 in view of non-removal of the office objections which were as regards effecting service on the Respondent Nos.3 and 4. The reasons why the office objections could not be removed have been mentioned in the above Civil Application. 3. In so far as Civil Application No.3 of 2008 is concerned, the same has been dismissed on account of the non-appearance of the learned advocate of the Applicant on the said date. 4. For the reasons mentioned in the above Civil Application No.73 of 2008, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause (c). The Contempt Petition No.452 of 2000 is accordingly restored to file as also the Civil Application No.3 of 2008. 3 5. List the Civil Application No.3 of 2008 after one week for hearing. 6. The above Civil Application No.73 of 2008 is accordingly disposed of. [R.M.SAVANT, J]