^ iC , „ ^ -b" 1<9~T> IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. T. WRIT PETITION (€-|NO.cg%r^ OF 2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ,.--,^ i/3--" L**' ,<?.J--^gt.'%' ... '^•L o^.-": gf •i'f" sf.-'~ •'y" Deshkar Advertising through its proprietor Arun Deshkar S/o Shri P.G. Deshkar, agedabout54years R/o Patwa Complex Raipiir, District Raipur C.G. VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary Urbap Administration and Development Departinent, DKS Bhawan Raipur C.G. 2. The Municipal Corporation Raipur through the Cpmmissioner, Raipur, s'w»~l"&'„ District BaaspHt-C.G. 3. Nagar Niveshak, Municipal Corporatiori Raipur C.G. WRIT PETITIONiUNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION ^y'^-^ -V HIGHCO^R^OFCHHflaT'ISGftRHATBItJtePUR WRlTI'ETn'IONmNlO.^SMORZO'tO Petitioner DeshterAdvertistng Versus Itesironcfents T'tie State ofChhattisaarh& Others WI^PETITIQNHNBERAR^ {SB:l^n'b^Mr.^ishK.Agnihotri,J.)^^^^^^^^^^^^,^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ y Rresent:- ShriRakeshPandev.Advocatefortliepetitioner. ShriA.S.Kachhaw'aha, Dy,Advocate ©eneralfbFtheState. Shri H.B.Agrawal, Sr. Advocate wtth Ms^^^^^^M Adhn^e fbr the resspondents No. 2 & 3. ;:y:^'.,^:':':^R ».©^tti:::.,-:i': •^•.; (Passed6nlQW<tayc^September,26'tO^ I.A.No^ . •: :: • ;1~'; ^hs ISart^pplic^ion Torwithdray^ ds.^^'theTan.. :.^,:,',:.:::-:, ...^ tjeamedcounsel^( aru^for^!^sideftavenool^ AppUe^on jsordered aS prs^ed^ fo^ Accoidin9ly,thewntp^iqnisdismfssedaswitftdrawn^ ,Ag^ow ^&s&s^^SSfS^^^^^^'sSvivSs/^^^^iS^