IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 13420 of 2000 Between: Mr.A.Shankaraiah, S/o. Bixapathy, Nalgonda, R/o. Nalgonda. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Andhra Pradesh Transmission Corporation Andhra Pradesh Ltd., Rep. by its Director, Vidyuthsoudha, Somajiguda, HYDERABAD. 2 Managin Director, Central Power, Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Limited, Somajiguda, HYDERABAD. 3 Superintending Engineer (Operations), Andhra Pradesh Transco Limited, Nalgonda, NALGONDA DISTRICT. 4 G.Ram Reddy, S/o. Lingareddy, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. 5 G.Surender Reddy, S/o. Ram Reddy, Bhongir, Nalgonda District. 6 P.Ramachandra Reddy, S/o. Pitchi Reddy, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. 7 K.Brahma Chary, S/o. Narayana, Miryalguda, Nalgonda District. 8 G.Madhava Reddy, S/o. Venkat Reddy, Bhogir, Nalgonda District. 9 N.Dyakar Reddy, S/o. Gopal Reddy, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. 10 N.Brahmachary, S/o. Sattayya, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue appropriate Writ or Direction or Order, more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declare the action of the respondents herein in non-promoting me as U.D.C. on par with promotees by Proc.Memo No.SE/OP/NLG/Adm/D.No.653 dt. 21.6.2000 and Memo No.SE/OP/NLG/Adm/U2/D.No.759, dt. 28.6.2000, Consequently, hold that the respondents are liable to promote me to UDC from the cadre of LDCs and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.SUDARSHAN REDDY DUDDUGUNTA Counsel for the Respondent No.: (SC FOR A.P.S.E.B.) THE HON’BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI W.P NO.13420 OF 2000 ORDER It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that pursuant to the interim order dated.25-07-2000 the petitioner’s claim was considered and he was promoted as U.D.C and therefore no further orders are necessary. Accordingly the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. --------------- G.ROHINI,J 23rd APRIL 2009 *TSNR