{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3377 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION STAMP NO.264 OF 2009 Chandrakalabai Bhika Gawali APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS ....... Mrs.V.A.Shinde, APP for respondent State Mr. Joydeep Chatterjee, Advocate for R-2 to 4 ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 12th July 2010 PER COURT: 1. By this application, the applicant has prayed for condonation of 171 days’ delay caused in preferring Criminal Revision challenging the order of acquittal dated 05.01.2008 passed in Sessions Case No.237/2006. 2. Though the learned counsel for applicant is not {2} present, yet after perusal of the contents of the application and for the reasons stated therein, it is to be inferred that the delay caused in preferring criminal revision application is not deliberate or intentional, however the same is inadvertent. In the premise, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause “A” and “B” and stands disposed of. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/B10/criapln3377-09