IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 25.02.2010 CORAM The Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. SUDHAKAR Writ Petition No.39155 of 2006 A. Manthiramoorthy .. Petitioner Vs 1. Director General of Police, Chennai.4. 2. Deputy Inspector General of Police, Tirunelveli. 3. Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli. .. Respondents Prayer: Original Application No.786 of 1999 on the file of Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, on abolition, transferred to the file of this Court and renumbered as W.P.No.39155 of 2006, praying to call for the records connected with Pro.1.P.R.128/96, dated 30.10.96 of the Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli Pro.No.2 Pro.A2/AP5/97, dated 19.3.97 of the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Tirunelveli 3. Pro.Rc.No.240273/AP.11(1)/97, dated 15.12.97 of the Director General of Police, Chennai.2 and set aside the same; and direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service. For Petitioner : Mr. Rajasekar For Respondents : Mr. S. Shivashanmugam Government Advocate ORDER This writ petition is filed to call for the records connected with Pro.1.P.R.128/96, dated 30.10.96 of the Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli Pro.No.2 Pro.A2/AP5/97, dated 19.3.97 of the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Tirunelveli 3. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Pro.Rc.No.240273/AP.11(1)/97, dated 15.12.97 of the Director General of Police, Chennai.2 and set aside the same; and direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the delinquency for which the punishment of removal from service imposed was one time breach in the service of the petitioner. The authorities have earlier rejected his plea of bonafide absence, which was on medical grounds. Learned counsel for the petitioner now states that he may be permitted to make a fresh petition to the Director General of Police to reconsider his claim for modification of punishment by way of re-instatement. 3. Considering the plea now made, without going into the merits of the writ petition, the petitioner is given liberty to make a fresh representation to the first respondent within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the same shall be considered and disposed of expeditiously. This writ petition is ordered accordingly. No costs. Sd/ Assistant Registrar /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1. The Director General of Police, Chennai.4. 2. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Tirunelveli. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli. + 1 C.C.to to the Govt., Pleader, High Court, Madras S.R.No.13403 + 1 C.C.to Mr.L.Rajasekar, Advocate, S.R.No.12568 WP No.39155/2006 LA(CO) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/