1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 591/2008 (Dattatraya Sadashivrao Bijwe VERSUS Ataullah Khan Mohammad Khan & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Shri S.Borkar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Thakre, counsel for the R-1 to 3. Shri Abhay Sambre, counsel for the R-4. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : OCTOBER 17, 2008. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has impugned the order passed by the Assistant Charity Commissioner, by which, the application filed by the petitioner under Section 41-A of the Bombay Public Trust Act was rejected. I have perused the impugned order as also the application filed by the petitioner under Section 41-A of the Bombay Public Trust Act. Neither does the prayer clause of the application under Section 41-A of the Bombay Public Trust Act nor do the contents of the application show as to what relief was sought from the authority by the petitioner by filing the said application. 2 In this background, no fault can be found with the impugned order passed by the Assistant Charity Commissioner on 29.10.2007 dismissing the application filed by the petitioner. For the reasons aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE APTE