MC 1798/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.R.SARMA (Amitava Roy, J) Heard Mr B Chakraborty, learned counsel for the applicants and Ms A Ver ma, learned Standing Counsel, Health & Family Welfare Department, Govt. of Assam . The office note dated 29.12.2010 indicates that the respondent Nos.12,13 and 14 are represented by the learned Standing Counsel, Health & Family Welfare Department and the respondent No. 15 by the learned State counsel. Notices had been issued to the private respondents by registered post with A/D. The aforemen tioned office note further indicates that vis-à-vis the notice some A/D cards ha ve returned and few others not. For respondent Nos. 2 and 16 the A/D cards have come back with the endorsement not known and not proper address . Be that as it may, having regard to the mode of dispatch of the notice a nd the fact that the same have been served on some of the said respondents who h ave not arranged for their representation today, we are of the view, having rega rd to the prayer made, that the application ought to be heard and disposed of t oday. Admittedly, the present applicants were not arrayed as respondents in th e batch of writ petitions in which their selection for engagement as ASHA Superv isor (Facilitator) in Gazarikandi Block PHC had been assailed. By the judgment a nd order sought to be impugned in the accompanying appeal, if leave is granted a s prayed for, the select lists dated 20.5.2009 and 6.10.2009 had been annulled. Having regard to the averments made in the application and the stake of the oppo site parties, we are of the view that in the interest of a full, fair and final adjudication of the issues, leave ought to be granted. Ordered accordingly. Misc. case stands allowed.