1 pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1740 OF 2010 SH. Mulayam Singh s/o Antram Singh .. Petitioner Vs. 1. The Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai and anr. .. Respondents Mr. Siddheshwar B. Kalel for petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Patil for respondent no.1. Mrs. P. P. Shinde, APP for State. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. JUNE 25, 2010. P.C. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as for the Corporation. In normal course this petition, for the reliefs prayed for, ought to have been filed and registered on the civil side of this court. However, the learned counsel for the Corporation submitted before us that if the petitioner calls on the Deputy Assessor and Collector of Octroi 2 Department, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai on any working day with the documents of the vehicle detained and the goods therein and pays the octroi charges on the said goods, the vehicle will be released. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would do so and call on the Deputy Assessor and Collector, Octroi Department on 28/6/2010 at 11 a.m. or any time before that. Petition is, therefore, disposed off. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)