MCC No. 682 / 11 In WPSB No. 52 of 2011 Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble U.C. Dhyani, J. Mr. C.D. Bahuguna, Advocate for the review applicant. Mr. Vinay Kumar, Standing Counsel for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 6. The review application is thoroughly misconceived, and the same is dismissed, in asmuchas the petitioner is contending that unless the Central Government allocates finally the petitioner to the State of Uttar Pradesh, as a Sister, the petitioner cannot be allocated to the State of Uttar Pradesh. The fact remains that the petitioner was not a Sister at the time when she became a provisional employee of the State of Uttar Pradesh, and the Central Government had jurisdiction to allocate only those people, who had become provisional employee with the State of Uttar Pradesh by reason of the proviso contained in the Re-organization Act of 2000. (U.C. Dhyani, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 23.09.2011 HN