IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4412 OF 2007 IN APPEAL NO.1069 OF 1999 IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.18 OF 1999 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.3828 OF 1998 Rajendra Bachubhai Ashar & Ors. .... Appellants Vs. Mrs. Dinaz Adi Bharucha & Anr. .... Respondents Sri Jose George for the Appellants. Sri R.J. Mane for the Respondent No.1. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SRI R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & SRI P.B. MAJMUDAR, JJ. DATED: DATED: DATED: JULY 04, 2008 P.C: P.C: P.C: Heard. Considering the facts disclosed in the affidavit in support of the notice of motion, though there is a considerable delay of 1217 days in filing the application for restoration of the appeal, the facts stated in the said affidavit reveal sufficient cause for such a long delay in taking out the notice of motion. Hence sufficient cause being shown for the delay, the same is condoned. The notice of motion is made absolute in terms of the prayer clauses (a) and (b). The notice of motion accordingly stands disposed of. (P.B.Majmudar, J.) (R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J.) sjs/J8nm4412.7 sjs/J8nm4412.7 sjs/J8nm4412.7