IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12278 of 2010 MANTU VERMA @ MANTU KUMAR VERMA, SON OF CHANDESHWAR VERMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Informant : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. B. Lal, A.P.P. ---------------- 2. 21/04/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the Informant and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 366 and 366A of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the statement of the victim under Section 164 Cr. P.C. wherein she has stated that she was not kidnapped by the present petitioner and she had eloped with him on account of love affairs, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 3.8.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Ram Prakash, Fast Track Court No. 6, Saharsa, in Sessions Trial No. 22 of 2010 arising out of Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 267 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on - 2 - date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)