IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 15TH JULY 2011 / 24TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 19211 of 2011(B) -------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- SREEKUMAR K.N, KOCHUVELIKAKATHU, KIZHATHIRI P.O, RAMAPURAM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN 686 576. BY ADVs.SRI.P.K.MANOMOHANAN SRI.N.A.GANAPATI RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-04. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR UNIVERSITY OF KERALA,PALAYAM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-04. 3. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY HIGHER EDUCATION TO THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1. BY SRI.V.VIJULAL, GOVERNMENT PLEADER. SRI.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, SC FOR R1 & R2. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No.19211/2011 A P P E N D I X PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT. P1 : COPY OF NOTIFICATION No.Ad.DII 3.3118/88 OF JULY 1988. EXT. P2 : COPY OF NOTIFICATION No.AD.H/5091/2011 DTD. 13.6.11. EXT. P3 : COPY OF REPRESENTATION DTD. 23.6.11 BY PETITIONER TO R1. EXT. P4 : COPY OF REPRESENTATION DTD. 24.6.11 BY PETITIONER TO R2. EXT. P5 : COPY OF REPRESENTATION DTD. 23.6.11 BY SNDP YOGAM TO R1. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. // True Copy // P.A. to Judge. smp T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.19211 OF 2011 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of July, 2011. J U D G M E N T The grievance raised by the petitioner herein, who belongs to Hindu Ezhava community, is that the notification issued by the respondent University for appointment of Lecturer in the Department of German Language showing it as reserved for Scheduled Caste community is not valid. 2. Ext.P4 is the representation filed by the petitioner before the Vice Chancellor of the University. Various grievances have been raised therein and finally the petitioner seeks for compensating the alleged loss caused to the constitutional right guaranteed to the Ezhava community in the matter of appointment. 3. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the University who also submitted that a suitable reply will be given to the complaint raised by the petitioner in Ext.P4. 4. I am not pronouncing anything on the merits of the W.P.(C) No.19211/2011 2 matter since it is upto the University to consider the grievance in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders. Therefore, there will be a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the grievance raised in Ext.P4 in accordance with law and communicate the decision to the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. This writ petition is disposed of as above. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp