IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.8470 of 2010 Date of Decision : May 10, 2010. Harjinder Kaur .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Manoj Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner impugns the selection and appointment of respondent No.6 on the post of Anganwari Helper in village Gunike, Tehsil Nabha, District Patiala, on the ground that neither respondent No.6 applied for the said post nor her name was recommended by the Gram Panchayat of the village. It is urged that respondent No.6 had in fact applied for the post of `Anganwari Worker'. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the fact that the factual contentions raised by the petitioner need to be verified from the records, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent No.2-Deputy Commissioner, Patiala, to call for the records, verify the stand taken by the C.W.P.No .8470 of 2010 2 petitioner and the Gram Panchayat regarding eligibility and/or entitlement of respondent No.6 to the subject post and take an appropriate decision by passing a speaking order and after hearing the parties in accordance with law/Government Policy, as early as possible, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. May 10, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE