{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3865 OF 2009 Sushila Damodhar Gondge, Age-50 years, Occ-Houshold R/o Hiswan (Bk) Dist-Jalna APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra Through Investigation Officer Taluka Police Station Jalna RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.R.J.Nirmal, Advocate for applicant Mrs.Yogita M.Kshirsagar, APP for the respondent State ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 24th November 2009 PER COURT: 1. By the present application, the applicant has prayed to release her on anticipatory bail in the event of her arrest in connection with CR No.276/2009 registered with Jalna Taluka Police Station for an offence punishable u/s 307, 323, 504, 324 r/w 34 of the IPC. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant followed by the {2} submissions of the learned APP. 3. According to learned counsel for the applicant, allegation against the applicant, in the complaint, is that during the quarrel between the family members of complainant and the family members of the present applicant, in the evening of 14th October 2009, the applicant had attacked on the brother of the complainant with a sickle. The applicant has annexed medical reports of the treatment given to her and by relying on the said medical papers, it is urged that the applicant is suffering from rheumatic arthritis and is unable to move freely from a considerable long time. Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the applicant is taking treatment for the said disablement for about 15 to 20 years and she is falsely implicated in the present case. 4. Application is vehemently opposed by the learned APP. 5. Learned APP has drawn my attention towards statements of eye witnesses and medical certificate, as according to her the present applicant has attacked on Shantabai and the eye witness has attributed a specific role to the present applicant, which is supported by the medical certificate. 6. Considering these submissions and the allegations in the complaint as well as statements of the eye witnesses recorded {3} during the investigation, the role played by the present applicant is that she has assaulted the brother of the complainant with a sickle, a sharp cutting object, however the injury certificate indicate that Shantabai has sustained CLW, which may be caused by hard and blunt object. Sickle cannot be described as a hard and blunt object, which itself goes to show that the allegations in the compliant are not supported by the medical certificates. In the premise, considering these aspects and the medical reports in respect the treatment undertaken by the applicant, the applicant deserves to be enlarged on anticipatory bail. 7. In the result, the application is allowed. The applicant be released on bail in the event of her arrest in connection with CR No.276/2009 on her furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.10,000/- and on executing a PR Bond in the like amount. This protection is granted for a period of 6 weeks from today within which time the applicant may apply for regular bail. Application stands disposed of accordingly. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/criapln3865-09