THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED C.R.P.No.3886 of 2010 ORDER This civil revision petition is directed against the docket order, dated 24.08.2010, passed by the learned VI Additional Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam in I.A.G.R.No.4256 of 2010 in O.S.No.220 of 2007 filed under Order XIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC seeking to reject Exs.A3 to A5, which are Xerox copies marked as original documents through the evidence of P.W.1. 2. In O.S.No.220 of 2007 filed by the first respondent herein for permanent injunction, trial was commenced and the evidence of P.W.1 was over. At the time of cross-examination of P.W.2, the Mandal Revenue Officer, the petitioner/defendant No.2 noticed that Exs.A3 to A5, which were marked through the evidence of P.W.1, are not original documents and they are colour Xerox copies and as such, he filed the above said I.A. seeking to reject those documents. The said petition was returned with certain objections and the same was resubmitted on 24.08.2010, on which date, the trial Court having not satisfied with the explanation, again returned for compliance. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed this revision. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the trial Court ought not to have directed the petitioner to file evidence affidavit of D.W.1 without numbering the petition filed disputing the validity of Exs.A3 to A5 marked through the evidence of P.W.1. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material on record. 5. From a perusal of the material on record, it is evident that the petition was initially returned on 23.08.2010 with certain objections and it was resubmitted on 24.08.2010, on which date, the trial Court again returned the same on the ground that the explanation submitted by the petitioner is not satisfactory. Numbering of a petition is at the discretion of the Court having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case. In the absence of any material with regard to the nature and description of the documents, this Court cannot give any direction to the trial Court. Since the petitioner did not comply with the objection raised by the trial Court, the petition was returned. Therefore, I find no merit in this revision. 6. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. _____________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J Date:27.08.2010 sj