IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.15629 of 2010 Date of Decision : September 10, 2010. Laddi Bus Service Regd. Mansa .....Petitioner versus Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Bathinda .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.P.S.Bawa, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks a mandamus to direct the respondent- authority to finalize and notify the regular joint time table for Bathinda– Patran via Maur, Mansa, Budhlada, Jakhal route. It may be mentioned here that the petitioner is a Transport Company who has got permit to ply its buses on the above mentioned route. It is alleged that the petitioner- company is operating its buses on this route since October, 2008 on the basis of provisional time table which has not been finalized so far. In this regard, the petitioner is said to have represented the respondent-authority through representation dated 2.8.2010 (Annexure P-2) but that too without any response. C.W.P.No .15629 of 2010 2 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, however, without expressing any views on the merits of the petitioner's claim, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondent-authority to consider the above-mentioned representation of the petitioner and frame a regular time-table to avoid inconvenience to the public at large and/or pass a speaking order in accordance with law/Policy, within a period of two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. September 10, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE