[[1]] IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. CHAMBER SUMMONS No.820 of 2006. IN SUIT No. 1752 of 2006. Mr. Mr. Mr. Jigar S. Rangoonwala & Jigar S. Rangoonwala & Jigar S. Rangoonwala & Another. .. ..Plaintiffs. Versus. Smt.Jayeshree Kirit Khatadia and others. .. ..Defendants. And Mr. Vinodkumar Chatrumal Bathija and Another. .. ..Respondents. Mr. G.B. Kedia, Advocate for the plaintiff. Mr. Vinodkumar Bathija, for Respondent no.1, present. Mr. Q.M. Ashtaq,Advocate for defendant No.1 and 2. CORAM:S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J. CORAM:S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J. CORAM:S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 11th JULY, 2006. 11th JULY, 2006. 11th JULY, 2006. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1] At the request of learned counsel appearing for the defendants and Respondent no.1 who appears in person, stand over for two weeks to enable them to file a reply. In the meanwhile, the status-quo as of today shall be [[2]] maintained in respect of the suit flat. This order is passed because respondent no.1 makes a statement that he is in possession of the suit flat and that share certificates have been duly transferred in his name. This order is passed without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties. [S.C. [S.C. [S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J] DHARMADHIKARI,J] DHARMADHIKARI,J]