wp4266of98.sxw 1 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4266 OF 1998 The Dy. Engineer, Satara Zilla Parishad Works Sub Division Bankham Tal. and dist Satara. .. Petitioner -versus Mr. Sunil Shankar Shitole r/o Falton , District: Satara. .. Respondent. Mr. G.C. Sawant i/b Mr. M.b. Mehre, for the Petitioner Mr. K.B. Sonwalkar, for Respondent CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED: 19th April, 2010 P.C. 1. Called from the final hearing board. 2. The learned counsel for the respondent makes statement that the respondent employee is working with the petitioner since l990. By the impugned order, Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Satara, declared the termination action bad in law and directed petitioner-original respondent to reinstate him with continuity of service without back wages. This Court, while admitting the petition refused to grant any interim relief. 3. In view of this, without observing anything further on the wp4266of98.sxw 2 merits of the matter, I am inclined to dismiss this petition with observation that the respondent employee is entitled for all the legal benefits in accordance with law. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Rule discharged. No costs. ( ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)