((-1-)) mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.140 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.247 OF 2009 Citicorp Finance (I) Ltd. Petitioner versus Rukmana Shankar Jhunjuwadkar and another Respondents Sanjay D. Thokade for petitioner. Amit Sale for respondent no.1. Y.M.Nakhwa, APP for State. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 07th May 2009 PC : 1. Not on board. Taken on board. 2. Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned advocate for the first respondent. The first respondent is present. It appears that there was communication gap between the advocate for the first respondent and first respondent and that is how the first respondent moved the concerned Court for delivery of possession. However, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the first respondent, the learned counsel for the first respondent ((-2-)) states that the first respondent will restore status-quo ante by handing over possession of the vehicle to the officer incharge of Kedgaon Police Station, District Sangli. He states that this statement is made without prejudice to his rights and contentions and this statement shall not be construed as any admission on the part of the first respondent. 3. The statement is accepted. Time of one week is granted to the first respondent to surrender the vehicle to the police station. The application is disposed of. Writ Petition shall be placed for admission on 11th June 2009. Till further orders are passed in the writ petition, possession of the vehicle shall remain with the concerned Police Station. (A.S.OKA, J.)