IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.947 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9000 of 2010 ====================================================== Narendradeo Prasad, son of late Keshwar Singh, r/o Village West Mohan Bigha, P.O. Dalmianagar, P.S. Dehri-On-Sone, Distt. Rohtas .... .... Appellant/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna. 2. Smt. Geeta Pandey, wife of Sri Narendra Pandey, r/o Mohalla Pali Subhas Nagar, P.O. Dalmianagar, P.S. Dehri, Distt. Rohtas. 3. Smt. Kaushlya Devi, wife of Sri Bisun Mahto, r/o Village West Mohan Bigha, Pali Dehri Town, P.O. Dalmianagar, P.S. Dehri, Distt. Rohtas. ……..Respondents 1st Set 4. Parikha Mahto, son of Tulsi Mahto. 5. Smt. Sanjharo Devi, wife of Parikha Mahto. 6. Krishna Mahto. 7. Balram Mahto. 8. Munnu Ji Mahto. (6 to 8 are sons of Parikha Mahto) Respondent nos. 4 to 8 are residents of Mohalla West Mohan Bigha (Ramphal Bigha), P.O. Dalmianagar, P.S. Dehri, Distt. Rohtas. ………Respondents 2nd Set 9. Indradeo Singh, son of Butai Singh, r/o Village Narsingh Bihga, P.O. Dalmianagar, P.S. Dehri, Distt. Rohtas. 10. Dhananjay Seth, son of Ramswaroop Seth. 11. Smt. Prabhawati Devi, wife of Anant Seth, d/o Ramswaroop Seth. Respondent nos. 10 and 11, both are residents of Mohalla West Mohan Bigha, P.O. Dalmianagar, P.S. Dehri, Distt. Rohtas. ……..Respondents 3rd Set 12. Sheodahin Mahto, son of Keshwar Mahto. 13. Sita Ram, son of Keswar Mahto. 14. Harihar Singh, Son of Sheo Pujan Singh. Respondent nos. 12 to 14 are residents of Village Mathuri, P.O. Dalmianagar, P.S. Dehri, Distt. Rohtas. .... .... Respondents 4th Set ====================================================== Patna High Court LPA No.947 of 2011 (5) dt.18-07-2011 2 Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. T.N. Maitin, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajni Kant Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manikant Mishra, G.P.-25 with Mr. Kinkar Kumar, A.C. to G.P.-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 5 18-07-2011 This appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent arises out of the order dated 3rd May 2011 passed by the learned single Judge in above CWJC No.9000 of 2010. In CWJC No.9000 of 2010, the appellant-defendant in Title Suit No.31 of 1991 pending before the Sub-Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram has challenged the order dated 3rd April 2010 made by the learned trial judge allowing the amendment of the plaint. The challenge before the learned single Judge has failed. Hence this appeal. In our opinion, an appeal under the Letters Patent against the order of the learned single Judge made in exercise of power of superintendence under Article 227 of the Constitution shall not lie. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. M. Rahman/- (R.M. Doshit, CJ) (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)