IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22708 of 2009 NARESH MAHTO @ RAM NARESH MAHTO, SON OF RAM BALLAM MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE GHOSRAMA, P.S. PIAR, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 05.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The case is under sections 302, 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner, who happened to be a scrap-dealer, had hired a tractor which was, later on, found to have been hijacked and the driver and Khalasi of the tractor were found murdered. Except for the fact that petitioner had hired the tractor on account of which a suspicion of his being involved in the conspiracy has been raised, no other material appears to have come during investigation to implicate petitioner in the crime. Petitioner is in custody since 19.4.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent at all. Considering the above facts and circumstances, this application is allowed. Let - 2 - petitioner (Naresh Mahto @ Ram Naresh Mahto) be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in Chakmehsi P.S. Case No.58 of 2008 with conditions as laid down in sub-section (3) of Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as may be applicable and also that one of the bailors shall be a close relation of the petitioner. In case of breach of any of the conditions at any stage to the satisfaction of the concerned court below, it shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner and take steps for his arrest. B.T (J.N. Singh, J.)