IN TH HIGH CURT OFJUDICATUREATBILASPUR (CG) w. P. {S} Né? 3972009 /:/ Jai-shahkar Pandey S/o Late. Sakal Deo Pandey, Age abouit 41 years, R/dNear Maharshi Aashram, Hatkachura, Jagdélpur (C.G.) fR .. \‘PETITIONE VERSUS RESPONDENTS /" 1. State 0fChhattisgarh Through— S€cretary, Scheduled'Casye, Scheduled Tribe V and BakWard Clasé Welfare Department D K S Bhawan Mantralaya Ralpur (C G) 2. The Comm1ss10ner Trlbal Development o« $ S Raipur (CG) _/' 3. The Secretary, Mata Rukamani Sewa Sanstha’n Samiti, ' _ Dimrapal Tah & District—[Jagdalpur (C G) RITPEHHONIJNDERARIICIES226OFIHE CONSTITUTION _ v z - OFINDIA E O #0 .. , W HIGH COURT OF CHHAT sGARHAfr' BILAsPUR W SB HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE P‘RITINKER DIWAKER ‘ my. s No. 4737 2009: ‘PETmONER > ' ' - ‘ ' Jalshapkar Pandey Versus State of C G 8s Others RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION 0 ‘ INDIA g Aggearance- ' ' Shrx S P Kale counsel for the pet1t10ne Shn P Das G A for the State ORAL ORDER (26 08 2009) I Wlth the consent of the counsel for the part1es the matter i 1s heard fmally I ’ ' 9 Contentlon of the counsel for the petltloner 1s that number 1' ‘V of Identlcal petxtxons have been declded by th1s Court and one such case 1s W P No 4108/2005 (Smt A Lall Vs State of C G 85 Others) He subn'nts that h1s case 1s squarely covered w1th the abovemenuoned case and therefore at th1s stage he may be perrmtted to w1thdraw th1s pet1txon w1th h l1berty to file representamon before respondent No 1 He however subrmts that /d1rect10n may be 1ssued for dec1d1ng h1s r exped1t1ously Counsel for the State submlts that at th1s stage he cannot make any statement as to whether the case of the petltloner 1s l covered With the order passed 1n aforemennoned wrlt petltlon as rehed upon by the pet1tloner He further submlts that 1f th petltloner w111 make a representatlon the same would be decided 1n accordance Wlth law after scrutmlzmg the factual and legal posmon of the case the petition 1's dismissed as Withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid In the eventuality of filing any such t r representatlon Aocordmgly, epresentation by the petitloner Within a period of three weeks irorn the date of receipt of copy of this order it is expected that he same would be deCIded Within a further period of two months It 1s made clear that th1s Court has not expressed any '_':_op1mon on merits of the case and the respondent No 3 would be at liberty to dec1de the representation strictly 1n accordance with " L law. l i ke iwar d Pritin "‘ W i‘ r e Sl- ker