CLCON No. 81 of 2001 Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J. Heard Sri Mahavir S.Tyagi learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri N.C.Gupta learned Standing Counsel for respondents. This contempt petition was filed with the allegation that the respondents have committed contempt of the order of the court dated 14.5.1998. In the counter affidavit of Surendra Singh Tomar as per averment of paragraph No.5 the allegation has been denied. The learned counsel for the petition drew attention to the show cause notice dated 11.12.2000 that despite the fact that the impugned order dated 2.4.98 was stayed by the said order of the court. The perusal of the notice dated 11.12.2000 reveal that no contempt of the order of the court was in fact made because the petitioners were intending to sell the trees which were standing in the disputed land which do not mean that the disobedience of the order of the court was made by the said show cause notice. Considering this there was no contempt of the order of the Court. The contempt petition is dismissed. Notice discharged. (Irshad Hussain, J.) Dated: 26-9-2003 ISB