IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH & THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.SURI APPARAO WRIT PETITION No.3925 of 2011 Between: Shaik Mohammad Ghouse ..... PETITIONER AND The Station House Officer, Kukatpally Housing Board Police Station, Hyderabad and another .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SURI APPARAO WRIT PETITION No.3925 of 2011 ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.Eswaraiah) The petitioner, who fell in love with Shaik Raziya Nasreen, the daughter of the 2nd respondent, married the said Shaik Raziya Nasreen on 10.02.2011 as per Muslim rites and customs before the Khazi, Amberpet in the presence of family members and friends against the wish of the 2nd respondent and his wife. This Writ of Habeas Corpus is filed alleging that when his wife i.e.Shaik Raziya Nasreen went to the college to write her practical examination, the police personnel of the 1st respondent took her to the police station stating that her father gave a complaint before the KPHB colony police station about missing of his daughter on 10.02.2011. Pursuant to the said complaint, the police registered a case in Cr.No.126/2011 under the head of “Woman Missing” and accordingly, examined the detenue. According to the petitioner, after the marriage, the alleged detenue lived with him alone till 14.02.2011. During course of investigation, the alleged detenue stated that she voluntarily left with the petitioner on 10.02.2011 and married him on the same day and lived with him at his residence till 14.02.2011, and attended the practical examination on 14.02.2011. She also stated that she would like to live with her parents till examinations were completed, later she will join her husband. It is further stated that the final report is filed before IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Kukatpally on 23.02.2011 stating that woman is traced out and action is dropped. Pursuant to the orders of this Court dated 28.02.2011 the alleged detenue was produced before this Court. We have examined the detenue and recorded her statement. She stated that her father is suffering from cancer. Her parents are not interested to perform her marriage with the petitioner. In order to convince them, she has been staying with her parents. Now she would like to live with her husband, the petitioner herein. As she is the major, aged about 27 years, she is at liberty to choose her ways and means and live and join her husband right now. Accordingly, she is permitted to go along with the petitioner and live with him, as per her wish and will. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. ________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J ____________________ V.SURI APPARAO,J Dated: 01.03.2011 Dsr