IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 3RD FEBRUARY 2009 / 14TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 35093 of 2008(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- PAULY, W/O.LATE GEORGE AGED 56, PARAKKA HOUSE,EXHATTUMUGHAM DESOM KARUKKUTTY VILLAGE,ALUVA TALUK. BY MR.V.RAJENDRAN (PERUMBAVOOR), ADVOCATE MR.GEORGE VARGHESE KIZHAKKAMBALAM, ADVOCATE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE SECRETARIAT, THIRUVNANTHAPURAM. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF SURVEY (RESURVEY) RESURVEY OFFICE, MINI CIVIL STATION, ALUVA. 3. KARUKUTTY GRAMA PANCHAYAT REP.BY ITS SECRETARY,KARUKUTTY P.O. 4. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.H.DIVISION KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, PERUMBAVOOR. 5. THE TAHSILDAR TALUK OFFICE, ALUVA. *6. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF SURVEY, COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD. (*IMPLEADED AS ADDITIONAL 6TH RESPONDENT IN THE WRIT PETITION AS PER ORDER DATED 03/02/2009 IN I.A.NO.1657/2009) MR.P.N.SANTHOSH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR R1,2,5 MR.M.DINESH, SC FOR KWA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.35093 of 2008 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 3rd day of February, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner submits that along with her husband, she has purchased an extent of 7.25 acres of land in Survey No.649/1/30/2A/1 of Karukutty Village. Out of this, they have already sold 62.021 cents to the 3rd respondent, which has been utilised for the purpose of the 4th respondent. 2. According to the petitioner, subsequent to all these, correction survey in re-survey was conducted and that out of the balance property now in their possession, a portion has been included along with the adjacent Puramboke property. As is seen from the statement filed by the 2nd respondent, an appeal filed by the petitioner in this behalf, numbered as 56/05, has been transferred to the additional 6th respondent, before whom, it is now pending. 3. In view of this, this writ petition is disposed of directing the additional 6th respondent to consider and pass orders on appeal No.56/05 with notice to the petitioner and as expeditiously as WP(C) No.35093/2008 -2- possible, at any rate, within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. 4. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the additional 6th respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg