IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.15916 of 2008 Between: R. Sai Reddy, S/o. Late Malla Reddy R/o.H.No. 6-1-148, Shivrampally, Rajendranagar, R.R. District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Rajendranagar Division, Rajendranagar, R.R. District. 2 The Inspector of Police, Rajendranagar Police Station, Rajendranagar, R.R. District. 3 The Sub-Inspector of Police, Rajendranagar Police Station, Rajendranagar, R.R. District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the actions of 2nd and 3rd respondents in interfering in civil dispute with respect to possession of my land in Sy.No.26/A and 26/AA of Katedan Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles of Constitution of India, consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd respondent not to interfere in civil dispute with respect to possession of my land in Sy.No.26/A and 26/AA of Katedan Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MIRZA SAFIULLA BAIG Counsel for the Respondents:AGP FOR HOME ORDER: Alleging undue interference by respondent Nos.2 and 3 in civil disputes between petitioners and third parties, the present writ petition is filed. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submitted that a private complaint was filed before VIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Rajendranagar against the petitioner showing him as sole accused and that on reference being made by the said Magistrate, respondent No.3 registered a case in Crime No.508 of 2008 and has been investigating the said crime. The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that if a crime has already been registered, the petitioner will cooperate with the investigation. In view of the same, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent Nos.2 and 3 not to interfere with the civil disputes and personal liberty of the petitioner except in connection with investigation of the crime already registered. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP.Nos.20635 of 2008 and 21334 of 2008 filed by the petitioner are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 1st JUNE, 2009. kvni