THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.13904 OF 2003 Dated 9th October, 2009 Between: Alluri Ganga Raju …Petitioner And The Divisional Electrical Engineer and Another …Respondents The Court made the following O R D E R: When the power supply to the petitioner’s agricultural service connection was disconnected, this writ petition was filed in the year 2003. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that pursuant to the interim order passed by this Court, the respondents have restored the power supply and continuing the same. Though this writ petition is of the year 2003, no counter-affidavit is filed on behalf of the respondents. As much as it is stated that the power supply is already restored, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to continue the power supply subject to payment of necessary consumption and demand charges by the petitioner. However, it is made clear that if the supply extended to the petitioner is not in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, this order will not preclude the respondents from issuing notice to the petitioner and taking appropriate action. No order as to costs. ____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J Dated 9th October, 2009 vrn