Crl. Revision No. 1727 of 2010 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Revision No. 1727 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:- 19.09.2011 Savitri ....Petitioner Vs. Sunil @ Shiela ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present:- Mr. N.K. Malhotra, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) Crl. Misc. No.31064 of 2010 In view of the averments mentioned in the application, same is allowed and delay of 16 days in filing the petition is condoned. Crl. Revision No.1727 of 2010 Assailed in this petition is the judgment dated 08.10.2008 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtak, acquitting the accused-respondent Sunil @ Shiela (hereinafter referred to as 'the accused') of the charge under Sections 302, 201, 363, 366, 376 read with Section 120-B IPC. There is no direct evidence in the case, but it is based on the circumstantial evidence. The testimonies of the complainant-Savitri (PW-3), her son Sumit (PW-4) and her Crl. Revision No. 1727 of 2010 (O&M) 2 husband Radhey Krishan (PW-9) are of no consequence, as the same are based on mere suspicion. The testimony of Savitri (PW- 3) is contradictory to the statement of ASI Maha Singh (PW-13). According to complainant-Savitri, her statement was recorded in the Police Station by some police officials at the direction of Maha Singh, whereas ASI Maha Singh (PW-13) has stated that Savitri had presented a written complaint before him. No witness stating that the prosecutrix was abducted and was last seen in the company of the accused, has been examined. Though, prosecution has tried to connect the relations of the deceased with the accused on the basis of two mobile phones Nos.9812312161 allegedly belonging to the accused and No. 919255201173 belonging to the deceased, but no evidence worth the name has been brought on record to show, if these telephone numbers were owned by the accused or the deceased respectively. No other evidence has been referred or point has been urged. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. (A.N.JINDAL) 19.09.2011 JUDGE ajp