IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 464 OF 2009 DR. THOMAS MATHEW ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Nitin Sardessai, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sameer Bandodkar, Additional Government Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- S.B. DESHMUKH & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 18th August, 2009 P.C. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned Additional Government Advocate on instructions makes a statement that the State has taken a decision, in principle to withdraw this order of transfer and issue fresh order of transfer posting the present petitioner at the place closer than the present transferred posting. Statement made is accepted and taken on record. The petitioner apprehends that meanwhile, till the issuance of the fresh transfer order, the petitioner may not be required to resume duties at the transferred place. Learned Additional Government Advocate on instructions submits that during the interregnum period i.e. issuance of the fresh order, the petitioner is not required to resume his duty at the transferred place, Canacona. In this view of the matter, petition stands disposed of with no orders as to costs. S.B. DESHMUKH, J. U. D. SALVI, J. lh/.