- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. CONTINUATION SHEET. CONTINUATION SHEET. CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.271 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.271 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.271 OF 2005 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.265 OF FROM ORDER NO.265 OF FROM ORDER NO.265 OF 2005 2005 2005 Abdul Wasid Ramzani ...Applicant vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Anr. ...Respondents CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : APRIL 15,2005. : APRIL 15,2005. : APRIL 15,2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocates for the parties. Considering the fact that the Appeal is admitted for final hearing, till the disposal of the Appeal, suit structure cannot be allowed to be demolished. Prima facie, I find that the impugned Judgment and Order does not consider all the documents which are placed on record by the original Plaintiff. Hence, Civil Application is disposed of by directing that till the final disposal of the Appeal, the Appellant and the Respondent No.1 will maintain status quo in all respects in respect of the suit structure. 2. It is made clear that pendency of the Appeal will not operate as stay of the proceedings of suit and the Trial Court will proceed with the hearing of the suit. 3. Hearing of the Appeal is expedited. JUDGE. JUDGE. JUDGE.