IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR: C.G. M.A. N0. $l & OF 2005‘ whim: Beam. MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 » Y MOTOR VEHICLES ACT 1988. g ; i § I ’Appellant: /United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Divisional Office, Cutuchery Chowk, Jail Road, ‘ \ Raipur. Non-applicant - 3 , i i‘ , Versus ‘ , 2 R s ondentsz: XVidesh’iram Lohan Tractor Vishvnkarina, Drlver 35 years, S/o Shauku i R/o Tamasiviny, Thana Aarang, District Raipur. ) Tek Singh S/o Heera Singh QOwner) R/o Tamasiviny, Thana Aarang',’ Tahsil & District Raipur. I . 1 Non-applicants — 1 &2 \ :i ' /3) Smt.Premeen Bai, aged 20 years Wd/o Duryodhan Tarak, 4 Tameshwar, aged 5 months (Minor), 9 i a . S/o Duryodhan Tarak, Through Vali Mother, Premeen Bai, ‘1’ L i Both R/o Village Rasni, Thana & Tahsil Aarang, HE District Raipur. 3 ff; i i yParau Ram, S/o Lakhanlal Tarak, aged 42 9"“ ‘N‘ years. é ll figs: ) Phekan Bai W/o Lakhanlal Tarak, aged 63 years, Nos. 5 & 6 R/o Village Tamasivni, Thana Aarang, 1: Tahsil & District Raipur. --- Applicants ll t ~ ¢ Claim in appeal for setting aside and/or, modified the j ‘ award, valued at Rs.2,ri’,000/-. v l l l Fixed Court Fee affixed at Rs. i5//- ‘/ i , _ (Receipt regarding deposition of Rs.25,000/; is being i M H filed herewith) ‘ i M Being a ieved by award, dated 08.12.2004, in claim‘ ' i case 20/2004 passed by the’If‘d Additional Motor , i : i r x Accident Claims .Tribunal, Raipur, the:m appellant \ v prefers this miscellaneous appeal on the following; ii . l‘ facts and grounds: u K ‘ 1 % Xl-HC-78 mwm MNMR #tzo‘o ‘ - mamqdiaw) mmmanw , V H WW#WW %Wané§1 ‘ Q'V‘SRGN 55%!65 HGN §LE SHRI S R NAY‘AK c. '. . - 3: HGN BLE QHR! =AKHRUDD‘ Ji 7 18-11-2995 =- M A Ne 312 of 2095 Heard Mr. Samay S. Agrawa‘i ’Eearnéd ccunsel f6r th appe§iantiUh€iéd EndE irisumnc'é ()6. Ltd}. ' r , ' gassed by the MAf‘T the only nSel fea’ *he appeHantiinsufaw while attacking the aw greund mged by‘ the ieamed Company is tha: he micy‘iSsae by “us chgni did riot sever ire ns hf the détéased it was can nded ihai the bricks were bein ‘ and therafore the transpcrtatwn‘ ;cOu!xi nét be 'regardéd éisthe o' e m connection \mth er reiatlng te agyicunural operatiun; We have carefully pew-3w the pieadirxgs m iha€ regard ag sef out in the written statement tiied y the insurance Company tf we may 5e ae may 1t coutd be It 15 n stated that the bricks were heme treneperted en hire beers and 1 t mnnectzen the eerwees ef th > deseesec! eex'e e‘tgagea ae Peete m he etaeence ef the prepe t eteadmg r“: ‘t‘at regaré thee e teamed for tne appeiiantfinsuranc Company that the policy issued , ’ bv the appeltant/lr‘su ance Comp ny does not cover the nek of th dereaeed is no’r eecepLble to us :ranspor’ced in the msurgd vehlc i n . a e . rm uceasmr: fer the Tribur‘ai to ' frame art iesue m that regard Thetefore me cantentton or th / e a u e k g ' w e mN§lz i \ .u&.-..?.u' “200 ma Ina-:5 (W) mavmanéa V C2.) m Em$ W# $Wa9 x é wa‘ai is idevoid of m §ri and it is accardingiy dismisse at e sia‘gv of adéBn i'e Cris=quenti C 1 of 96 f , Fakhmddin Sd/— ‘3 § W ‘ Judge ‘r c MJ ‘P No 33? af 2095 and {A N9 73 25 s and disimed G W f / u WWW né1 v' . x ‘ ?h é § d th é hié tsif. L ‘