IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 18812 of 1999 Between: 1 K.Subhas Reddy S/o K.Srinivas Reddy Hyd. 2 K.Ramesh Reddy S/o K.Srinivas Reddy Hyd. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Asst Commissioner of Labour-III, AP, Hyd. 2 The Revenue Inspector, Musheerabad, Hyd. 3 G.Gopala Reddy C/o P.Chandrashekar, Emerald Hotel, Abids, Hyd. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the impunged distraint order issued by the R2 herein i.e. the revenue Inspector, Musheerabad, Hyd dt 30-6-99 served on 5-8-99 as illegal, arbitrary unjust & aginast the prl of natural justice & conequently to set aside the distraint ordr dt 30- 6-99 served on the petitioners on 5-8-99 pending disposal of the application to set aside the exparte order in S.C. 64/94 on 28-7-99 Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.JANARDHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO. 18812 OF 1999 ORDER: Since none appeared for the petitioners on 12.08.2008, the writ petition was directed to be posted “for dismissal”. Today though the writ petition is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, neither is the counsel for the petitioners present nor is there any representation on his behalf. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as costs. ____________ 13-08-2008 GS