IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 16.12.2010 C.R.No.8174 of 2010 (O&M) Gurpal Singh ...Petitioner Versus Ashok Kumar ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) Challenge in the present petition is to Annexure P-7, whereby an order of status quo was communicated to the petitioner. A perusal of Annexure P-7 would show that it is a summon calling upon the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat of Village Meharbanpura to appear before the Court. The petitioner has been further communicated that the Court has passed an order to maintain status quo. It is admitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has since filed written-statement and also reply to the application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC. In view of the said fact, the learned trial Court is expected to decide the application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 within a period of 30 days. Therefore, I do not find that any case for interference is made out at this stage. However, the learned trial Court is directed to decide the C.R.No.8174 of 2010 (O&M) application for grant of ad interim injunction within a period of 30 days in terms of Order 39 Rule 3-A of the CPC. Disposed of accordingly. 16.12.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE 2