IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Cr.M.P.(M) No. 1432 of 2010. Decided on: 5.1.2011. Sudesh Kumar ……….Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh ……….Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Mr. Vinay Thakur, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Mr. Vinay Thakur, learned Counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the petition at this stage. However, the liberty is revered to the petitioner to approach the Court after consideration of the challan. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge January 5, 2011. (hl) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.