IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.812 OF 2005 Ravindra Madhusudan Patade ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... Mr.A.S.Rajadhyaksha for Applicant. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, A.P.P. for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. FEBRUARY 11, 2005. FEBRUARY 11, 2005. FEBRUARY 11, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. Perused the record. 2. I see no reason to depart from the well considered view taken by the Court below. Court below has examined every aspect of the matter, which has been re-iterated before this Court in the present Application, as can be discerned from Paragraphs 6 to 10 of the order. As there is ample : 2 : evidence to indicate the complicity of the Applicant, not a case for bail, having regard to the seriousness of the offence. Hence, rejected. 3. The Trial Court is directed to ensure that the trial is concluded at the earliest, preferably within nine months from the receipt of writ of this Court. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.