IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No: 2798 of 2008 Between: P.S.V. Sanjeeva Rao S/o. Late Chiranjeevi Rao State Bank of india, Ponduru Branch, R/o. D.No.16- 4-4/2, Opposite SET Junior College, Gujarathipeta, Srikakulam. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Branch Manager & Disbursing Officer State Bank of India, Ponduru Branch. 2 The Asst. General Manager & Disciplinary Authority, Region-II, State Bank of India, Zonal Office, Sripuram, Visakhapatnam. 3 The Dy. General Manager & Appellate Authority, State Bank of India, Zonal Office, Sripuram, Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus calling for the records relating to the issue of impugned orders in proceedings No.(3-0) (DPC) (VSP) R-II/30, dated 20-02-2007 of the second respondent and quash the same as arbitrary, illegal, unfair and ultra-virus the rules with a direction to restore the original position in pay & allowances of the petitioner refunding the amount already deducted from his pay and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.RAMABRAHMAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.DEEPAK BHATTACHARJEE The Court made the following : ORDER: It is the case of the petitioner that he ﬁled an appeal aggrieved by the order dated 22-02-2007 imposing a punishment of reduction in scale of pay by one stage for a period of one year with cumulative effect. The grievance of the petitioner is that the said appeal is not disposed of till date. There is no necessity of going into all the details. The learned counsel for respondents states that the appeal purported to have been ﬁled by the petitioner was taken up and was also disposed of on 22-03-2007 during the pendency of the writ petition. In view of the same, nothing survives in the writ petition for further adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. ------------------- C.V.RAMULU, J 4th September 2008 CVRK ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies