IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36576 of 2010 MAHENDRA CHAUDHARY & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 28.1.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioner no.3 is old widow mother-in-law and pensioner. Petitioners no.1 and 2 are brother-in-law and petitioners no.4 and 5 are sisters-in-law. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner no.3 is owner of the house. She has only allowed petitioners as well as the complainant to reside in the house. But for claiming of some share in the house as well as in pension amount, this case is lodged making ornamental allegation of theft that also in house which is not owned by the complainant. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No.1094/09 the petitioners No.1. Mahendra Chaudhary, 2. Santosh Chaudhary, 3. Soniya Devi, 4. Sabita Devi and 5. Deep Devi, shall be released on 2 bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Gaua, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. Anilkr.sinha` (Mandhata Singh,J.)