IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1718 of 2009 Ram Adhin Singh, son of Late Sant Prasad Singh resident of Village-Fulli, Police Station-Kudra, District-Kaimur at Bhabhua. ….Petitioner. Versus 1. State of Bihar. 2. Arun Kumar Singh, son of Raj Keshar Singh. 3. Anil Singh, Son of Baleshwar Singh. 4. Sashi Singh, son of Baleshwar Singh. 5. Ram Lal Singh, son of Late Nanku Singh, resident of Village- Pipra, Police Station-Kudra, District-Kaimur. 6. Manoj Kushbaha, son of Ram Lal Singh. 7. Bharat Singh, son of Bikram Singh. 8. Nagendra Lal, son of Ganga Lal, resident of Village-Bhokari, Police Station-Kargahar, District-Rohtas. …Opposite Party. ---------------------------------- 02. 02.12.2011 The accused petitioner has preferred this revision application against the judgment and order dated 10.09.2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No. 1, Kaimur at Bhabhua in S.T. No. 126/2006/59/2006 by which the accused Opposite Party Nos. 2 to 8 have been acquitted for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 323, 324, 149, 307/34 and 504 of the I.P.C. and 27 of the Arms Act. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State and perused the impugned judgment. It appears that the learned Trial Court has found the evidence of the prosecution not fit to be relied upon as they have made contradictory statement and the injury report also does not support the prosecution case. Considering the facts and circumstances, the learned Trial Court has acquitted the accused by giving them the benefit of doubt. Considering the facts and circumstances, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. The revision application is dismissed. Kamlesh (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)