IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2010 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 8275 of 2010() ---------------------------------- CMP.9788/2010 of J.M.F.C.-I,NEYYATINKARA CRIME 1164/2010 OF NEYYATINKARA POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT U/S. 341, 294(b), 323, 324, 326, 307, 302 & 34 IPC OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, NEYYATTINKARA. .................... PETITIONER/(A4) ---------------------- SIVA KUMAR, S/O.RAJENDRAN, KIZHANGUVILAKATHU VEEDU, KADAVATTAROM DESOM, VLANGAMURI, NEYYATTINKARA. BY ADVS. SRI.SASTHAMANGALAM S. AJITHKUMAR SRI.P.M.SANEER SRI.V.S.THOSHIN RESPONDENT(S): STATE: ----------------------------- THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEYYATTINKARA POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: svs/ V.RAMKUMAR, J. --------------------------------------------------- Bail Application No.8275 of 2010 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of December, 2010 ORDER The petitioner, who is accused No.3 in Crime No.1164 of 2010 of Neyyattinkara Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 323, 324, 326, 307 & 302 read with Section 34 I.P.C., seeks his enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 27/08/2010. The petitioner was arrested on 03/11/2010. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioner, the sentiments of the near relatives of the victim and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE skj