CWP No.1581 of 2008 (O&M) -1- In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. Date of decision:12.01.2009 Jagtar Kaur ... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI Present: Mr.Amrik Singh, Advocate,for the petitioner. Ms.Charu Tuli, Senior DAG, Punjab. Mr.KK Saini, Advocate,for respondent No.4. PERMOD KOHLI, J. (Oral): I have heard the learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the record of the case. The petitioner has challenged the appointment of respondent No.4 as Anganwari worker on the ground that she belongs to a different village. This fact is conceded by learned counsel for respondent No.4. Respondent No.4 has filed Civil Misc. No.25199 of 2008 in the present writ petition appending thereto a copy of the order dated 17.12.2008 whereby the appointment of respondent No.4 has been cancelled. Ms.Tuli states that the appointment of respondent No.4 was made erroneously and the same is, accordingly, cancelled. She has further stated that appointment shall be made on the basis of the applications already received for the post in question in accordance with the merit. Let all the eligible applicants who had applied within time, be considered for appointment within a period of four weeks and consequential order be passed. CWP No.1581 of 2008 (O&M) -2- In this view of the matter, present petition is disposed with the observations aforesaid. In view of the disposal of the writ petition, C.M. No.25199 of 2008 is hereby dismissed. 12.01.2009. (PERMOD KOHLI) BLS JUDGE Note: Whether to be referred to the Reporter? NO