... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1083 OF 2006, WRIT PETITION NO.1083 OF 2006, WRIT PETITION NO.1083 OF 2006, CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1085 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO.1085 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO.1085 OF 2006 AND AND AND CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1086 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO.1086 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO.1086 OF 2006 Pratibha P. Mistry ...Petitioner (In all three Petitions) Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents (In all three Petitions) Shri Y.R.Dube for the Petitioner in all the Petitions. Shri S.V.More, A.P.P. for the State in all the Petitions. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : OCTOBER 03, 2006. : OCTOBER 03, 2006. : OCTOBER 03, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Petitions with liberty to file revision Applications before the Sessions Court for challenging order passed by the learned Magistrate by which process has been issued on the private complaint filed by the second Respondent. He prays that this court may direct the Revisional Court to condone the delay. 2. The second prayer cannot be considered as the Petitioner will have to apply to the concerned ... 2 ... Revisional Court for condonation of delay. The Petitions are filed in this Court in March 2006. Therefore, the Petitioner will have to explain the delay up to March 2006. 3. Hence, I pass the following order: (i) Writ Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. (ii) If revision Applications are preferred by the Petitioner, the concerned court is bound to take into consideration the fact that Writ Petitions were filed in this court on 09th March, 2006 and the same were pending till today. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE