PETn'igNER H!GHCPURTPFCHHATTISGARH:B1L^^ Writ Petition No. 4388 of 2004 Kumart Neeta Jain, aged 35 years, occupation - Advocate Daughter of Shri Sajjanmai, 7, Mahavjr Nagar, Durg (CG). RESPONDENTS Versus 1. Kumari Saroj Pandey, daughter of Shyamji, Mayor, Municipal Corporatton, Durg (CG). 2. State of Governraent of Chhattisgaarh, through the Secretary, Paryavaran, Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (CG). 3. Coilector, Durg (CG). 4. Senior Superintendent of Police, Durg (CG). 5. Officer in charge, Poitce Station, Durg. (Writ Petition under Articfe 226/227 ofthe Con^itutfon of tndia) SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Mr. Vishnu Koshte appears on behaif of Mr. N.L. Shrivastava, counsei for the petitioner. Mr, Sanjay K. Agrawal wHti Shri Ankit Singhal, counsel for the respondent No.1. Mr. ShashanR Thakur, Panet Lawyer for tfte State. ORAL ORDER (Passedon this 10th day of September, 2008) By this petitton, the petffioner seeks a diRection to order immediate registration of first information report and investigation by Clty Suparintendent of PoJSce, Durg and consequent action thereupon, In ttiis petition several allegations were made. The petition was fited on 18-11-2004, 2) Mr, Vishnu Koshta, iearned counsel appaaring for the petitioner, on instructions, submite that a complaint has been fii®jon the basis ef grievances averred in this petition. The criminal court ha®atready taken cognizance of the matter. 3) Since a compiaint has been filed and cognizance thereon has afreaciy been taken by the criminat court under tlie provisions of ttie Code of Crtminai Procedure (for short, "Cr.P.C".), no further action is necessary at ttiis stage, ^ Raju -2- by the High Court in ©xerciseof tts jurisdiction under Articte 226/227 of the Constltutson. The petitioner may pursue the remedly avaitable to him, in accordance with iaw, under the provisions of Cr.P.C. 4) With the aforesaid observation this petition is dlsmissed. Consequentfy, M.W.P.No.4746/2004 stands disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge