IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.7256 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 09.12.2009 Sudesh Kumar .....Petitioner versus Satish Sachdeva .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Virender Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner-tenant is aggrieved at the order dated 29.10.2009 passed by the Rent Controller, Karnal, whereby he has been restrained from carrying out the commercial activities in the ground floor of the demised premises allotted by the Housing Board, Haryana. The petitioner's grievance is that the show cause notice dated 24.9.2009 issued by the Estate Officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority, Karnal, threatening to resume the subject house on account of its alleged misuse by the petitioner-tenant, has been procured by the respondent-landlord in order to throw him out from the demised premises. The petitioner is stated to have represented against the said show cause C.R. No.7256 of 2009 (O&M) 2 notice vide Annexure P-5. Concededly, the demised premises is the ground floor of a residential house. In these circumstances, no fault can be found with the impugned order unless the petitioner obtains permission from the HUDA authorities to continue with the tailoring business and persuade these authorities to withdraw the show cause notice served by them upon the landlord. In any of such eventuality, the petitioner shall be at liberty to apply to the Rent Controller, Karnal, to modify the impugned order on the basis of the changed circumstances and such an application shall be considered immediately and in accordance with law. Disposed of. Dasti. 09-12-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE