IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31457 of 2008 MD. KALIMUDDIN ANSARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 29.08.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for the offences under Sections 467/468/471/420 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner is to the effect that in connection with his appointment as Secondary School Teacher the petitioner submitted his mark sheet of intermediate examination to show that he obtained 703 marks which on enquiry was found not to be a genuine document, and as such, the petitioner obtained the appointment by fraudulent means. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that as a matter of fact the petitioner had submitted the genuine mark sheet of the intermediate examination having secured 581 marks which was self attested, as required for submitting the application. It is further submitted that on enquiry it was found that the mark sheet bearing the signature of the petitioner having 581 marks in the intermediate examination is genuine and the mark sheet having 703 marks is not genuine. It is further contended that although the petitioner had 2 submitted the correct mark sheet, however some one in inimical terms with the petitioner has replaced the same. It is also submitted that during investigation materials have come to the effect that the fact that this petitioner had submitted the mark sheet bearing 703 marks is not correct. Considering the above, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. His prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is, accordingly, rejected. It is, however, made clear that in case the petitioner on surrender makes an application for grant of bail before the Court below, the same shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)