HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.6030 of 2011 ORDER:- Petitioners herein are A-1 and A-2 in the criminal case i.e. C.C.No.65 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Gadwal. Both of them have been charge sheeted by the concerned police in the said case for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 344, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. 2. A noticeable feature in the case is that the de facto complainant is no other than the mother of A-1 who is said to be an advocate and A-2 is the wife of A-1. The complaint of the mother is that A-1 and A-2 harassed her husband i.e. the father of A-1 and wrongfully obtained certain documents from his father as if to show that the father has gifted or given away certain properties to A-1 i.e. his son. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners vehemently argued that here is a case where the father has not complained anything and earlier there was a settlement in Lok Adalath also between A-1 and his parents and that subsequently the mother has given this complaint. It should be noted that the de facto complainant is the mother of A-1 and she is not a step mother. May be what the petitioners are saying is correct i.e. the father has given the property out of his own volition and the mother is disputing it but it may be noted that going by the rule of probability a mother will not generally give a false complaint against her son that too when she is in old age. The learned counsel for the petitioners invited my attention to various documents and other circumstances to show that the case is a false one. It may be noted that whether the case is true or a false one has to be decided on evidence and not in this quash petition. 4. Accordingly, there are no grounds to interfere in this matter and this petition is dismissed at the admission stage. ______________________ N. RAVI SHANKAR, J 21st July 2011 CVRK