^^^^,15 Q^VJ^--^ ^.^^ '4^n • /—^ <' df'1-^1 ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CCHHATISGARH) ^3^ WRIT PETITION fCriminal) No.: - /20Q9 S.B. PETITIONER: jSW ../^' ^••yT ^•'^ ^y ^" Smt. Hemlata Sahu, Age-31 years, Widow/Of-Late Shri Chhabi Lal Sahu, By Profession-House hold, R/0:-Village- Manik-Chowri, P.S. Abhanpur, Tahsil- Raipur, Distt. Raipur [C.G.] -: VE RSU S:- RESPONDENTS: - 1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Home Department, D.K.S. Mantralaya Bhavan, Raipur [C.G.] ^ 2. The Inspector General Police/ D.I.G, Police Headquarter at Raipur, Raipur [C.G.] 3. The Superintendent Police, S.P. Range Raipur, Distt. Raipur [C.G.] of 4. The Station House Officer, Police Station- Gobra-Nayapara, Distt. Raipur [C.G.] (^- ^ 5. The Station House Officer, Police Station-Abhanpur, Distt. Raipur [C.G.] / 6. ChandrashekharSahu, Aged about- 52 Years, S/0 Shri Sunder Lal Sahu, At present holding the post of "Krishi-Matri" State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Permanent Residential Address, R/0 Village- Manikchowri, Police Station Abhanpur, Distt.Raipur [C.G.] ^< ^c>}< ^ >t<^< ^ -: WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF THE DIRECTION fSL or ORDER FS1:- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH AT BILASPUR ^? WRn' PETmON (Cr.) No. 4097 of2009 PETITIONER : Smt. Hemlata Sahu. VER8U8 RE8PONDENT8 : The State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agmhotri, J. Present: Di\ Rajesh Pandey, Advocate with Slm J.A.Lohani, Advocate for the for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Advocate General fbr the State. Shri A.S.Kachhwaha and Shri Shiljit C.S.Nair, Advocate appearing on behalfofShi'i Kishore Bhaduri, Advocate forthe respondent No. 6. ORDER fORAL) (Passed on 28U1 day of July, 2010) 1. Leamed counsel appearmg for the petitioner, on instmctions, seeks pemiission ofthis Court to withdraw this petition on the ground that since the petitioner has already filed a complaint under section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Rajim, District Raipur, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side has no objection. 3. It is ordered accordingly. 4. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, since the complaint case has already been filed, it is expected that the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Rajim, shall look into the matter and consider and decide the case in accordance with law. Satisi^^nttlotn jud^ Amit