IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33921 of 2010 PAPPU YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 04.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Having got a tip off informant and other police officers raided a guessing center and arrested one Munna Yadav from whose possession several incriminating articles were recovered. So far as petitioner is concerned, neither he was caught on the spot nor anything was recovered from his possession. The name of petitioner was disclosed by apprehended co-accused MunnaYadav. Furthermore, it is an admitted position that on the date of alleged occurrence two cases were registered on the basis of disclosure made by above stated co-accused Munna Yadav. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner has already been granted privilege of anticipatory bail in another case. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, petitioner, namely, Pappu Yadav, in the event of his arrest/surrender within four weeks from the date of communication of this order, shall be released on bail in connection with Civil Lines P.S. Case No. 107 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Gaya subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)