IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19065 of 2009 1. SANTOSH KUMAR 2. Shailesh Kumar Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 08.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there was negotiation only which could not be finalized due to non- matching of the pair, as averred in para-6 of the petition. The date of tilak was 25.06.2007 but liking or disliking of the petitioner no.1 appeared later that is on 28.06.2007. According to the learned counsel, if every thing was final, no question was remaining for coming of petitioner no.1, the bride groom for his opinion about the bride. He further submits that payment is also not believable, as that has been shown made before finalization of the marriage. Lastly, learned counsel submits that the girl has already married and petitioner no.1 neither married, nor he is to be married, as he has to complete C.A. course and even then he is apprehending his arrest which cannot be justified. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 653 of 2007, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Nawada subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)