IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2368 OF 2009 Mahesh Narashonda alias Narsu Birnale & Anr. ...Petitioners V/s. Kalappabhau Birnale & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Ms.Jai V.Kanade for Petitioners. None for Respondents. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. MARCH 12, 2009. MARCH 12, 2009. MARCH 12, 2009. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the Petitioners. 2. Having regard to the fact situation of the present case, I am not inclined to exercise writ jurisdiction; more so, for the reasons recorded by the Court below at this interlocutory stage. The grievance of the Petitioners that the view taken by the Court below is manifestly wrong can also be agitated in the appeal to be preferred by the Petitioners against the final decision of the Trial : 2 : Court. 3. Thus understood, leaving all questions in this behalf open, this Writ Petition is dismissed. 4. It is once again made clear that the Appeal Court shall not be influenced by the fact that this Writ Petition has been dismissed and shall decide all issues on its own merits in accordance with law. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.