1 NMS.1589/2010 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1589 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO. 1548 OF 2010 Veronica Richard Albuquerque ..Plaintiff. Vs. Eudocia A. Aase & Anr. ..Defendants. ---- Mr. P.G. Lad, Sr. Advocate for the Plaintiff. Ms. Ujwala Sawant i/b R.V. Govilkar, for the Defendants. --- CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 27 th AUGUST, 2010 P.C. 1] When this Notice of Motion was placed for hearing and final disposal, it was stated that one Chamber Summons being Chamber Summons No.963 of 2010 in the suit is pending. That Chamber Summons is for amendment in terms of schedule annexed thereto. 2] It is stated that the amendment is to join necessary party/respondent. Considering the nature of the relief claimed, in my view, presence of the respondent would be necessary. That would be for effectively and completely adjudicating the rights of the parties. 2 NMS.1589/2010 3] The Chamber Summons is duly served on the defendants and the respondent. There is no affidavit in reply. Accordingly, the Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment should be carried out within a period of two weeks from today. 4] After the plaint is amended, the plaintiff can move fresh notice of motion. To enable Shri Lad, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the plaintiff to do so, the present notice of motion no.1589 of 2010 is allowed to be withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh motion after amendment is carried out. 5] The Chamber Summons as well as Notice of Motion stand disposed of accordingly. No costs. [S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.]