IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.808 of 2008 Keshaw Rai, Son of Late Shamu Rai, R/o Village- Tilath, Police Station-Piro, District-Bhojpur.—----(Defendant)-Petitioner. Versus 1.Subhash Rai. 2.Ashok Rai. Both Sons of Dal Singar Rai. (Sons of Plaintiff who died in 1997) ------------------------Plaintiffs-Opposite Party Ist Set. 3.Ram Ashan Rai, Son of Kesho Rai. 4.Dulhin Sunaina Devi, Wife of Kesho Rai. -----------------------------------Defendant Nos.2 & 3)O.P. 2nd Set. All are residents of Village- Tilath, Police Station-Piro, District- Bhojpur-------------------------------------Opposite Parties. ----------- 2. 17.08.2011 Heard the learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. The present revision application has been filed against the order dated 01.03.2008 passed by Munsif I, Ara in Title Suit No. 58 of 1992 rejecting the defendants/petitioner objection with regard to the pecuniary jurisdiction of the court with regard to the suit on the ground that the suit has now been fixed for final argument. It appears from the impugned order that the 2 suit is at the stage of disposal and the matter has been fixed for final argument. The learned court has also observed that at the time of disposal of the suit all the issues arising between the parties shall be decided. In this view of the matter, there is no illegality or error of jurisdiction in the impugned order. It is needless to say that the issue with regard to jurisdiction (pecuniary jurisdiction) as already framed shall also be decided alongwith other issues. The Revision application is, accordingly, dismissed. Nitesh ( V. Nath, J.)