IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.4057 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO.4057 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO.4057 OF 2008 Maruti Bandu Bandgar, .. Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra, Respondent. Mr P.G.Sarda, for the applicant. Mr K.V.Saste, APP, for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 08/12/2008 DATE : 08/12/2008 DATE : 08/12/2008 PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard Mr.Sarda, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr.Saste, learned APP, for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.307 of 2008 of Mohol police station. The said crime has been registered against the applicant and six others for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 395,397,201,120(B) of IPC and 3 and 25 of the Arms Act. 3. It is the prosecution case that on 16.7.2008 at 10.30 am all the accused committed robbery on the highway and robbed the truck and cash of Rs.4000/- from the truck driver. All the accused, at the relevant time, were in Scorpio vehicle and the present applicant was its driver. On arrest of the applicant the complainant identified him in the police lock-up as one of the persons, who robbed his truck. He produced Scorpio vehicle used for committing the alleged offence. Having considered overall facts and circumstances of the case, in my opinion, there is sufficient prima facie material on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime. Hence, the application is rejected. . While rejecting this applciation I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case without being influenced by the observations made in this order. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)