(1) WP. 5451.2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5451 OF 2009 Somnath Ganpat Kolapkar .. Petitioner VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1704 OF 2009 Chandanmal Gopaldas Lokchandani died through his son and anr. .. Petitioners VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1705 OF 2009 Sayyed Ratanbhai Sayyed died through his LRs. .. Petitioners VERSUS The Tahasildar, Rahata and ors. .. Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO. 2952 OF 2009 Gangadhar Kashinath Turkane and ors. .. Petitioners VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents Advocate for the Petitioners- Mrs. M.D. Thube-Mhase, Advocate for the Petitioners (In W.P.1704.2009 and W.P. 5451.2009) Mr. V.J. Dixit, Sr. Counsel i/b. Mr. L.V. Sangeet, Advocate for the petitioner (In W.P. 1705.2009) Mr. P.M. Shah, Sr. Counsel i/b. Mr. S.P. Shah, Advocate for the petitioner (In W.P. 2952.2009) (2) WP. 5451.2009 Advocate for the Respondents (In All matters)- Mr. N.B. Khandare, GP for the respondent nos. 1 to 3 Mr. R.N. Dhorde, Advocate for the respondent no.4 Mr. V.D. Hon, Advocate for the respondent no.5 ... CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 6TH JULY, 2010 PER COURT:- 1. Heard counsel. The counsel for the petitioners would submit that whatever shops are at the spot may not be demolished till expiry of six (6) weeks period and immediate eviction of those who were not removed from the place be not effected. 2. Status quo to be maintained for six (6) weeks but if the shop-keepers are already removed, this order does not mean permission to re-enter. Sd/- [V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp