Ww’zsk @ iN THE Wi§§~é CGU¥§T G?” CHHATTEgé£R§wi AT 83:1.AS?U'R WRET ?§”§T§‘10i\§ §$? NG. 9 132 i23i)? PETETXGN§Ri f.Lakhm Pmsad Shawn. sm of Shm’ Lachchi Frasad Sharma; aged abouf 75 years; Ra?ired Pcwwari‘ raSidam m‘ Wiage Bammwkrq fekséi Sémga; Diswic? Raipur’ (C6) [/v §ES§GNDENT5: 1. 5mm 0f Chha‘r‘?isgarh. “fhrougéa the. ' 52crm‘ar‘y, Semrgi Admmigi'mfien Dagxar‘mem; Dau Kcdyan 5ingi’: Bhawmn, V3 5acremriai féaimr. . / 2. The 5ecre‘mryi Degawmen‘r 0f Revenue; Dau Kaiycm Singh Bhawcm, Secramria‘‘a, Raipur‘. / 3. Th2 Joim‘ Dirac‘ror‘i Treasuryi )ansion &_ Accounfsr. Raipur. 4. The Sub Divisionai Offices“; NagPii Di??? Dhammr‘i {C(5) WRET P£TETION UNbEé§ A§?ICLE 22$ GF THE CGNE‘)?I?UTEGN Q i {3F XN§DI;% \" § R .‘ @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT \ BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 7232 of2009 PETITEONER Lakhan Prasad Sharma. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITKON UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agggotri. J. Present: Shri Dinesh R.K.Tiwari, Advocate > z for the petitioner. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer for the State/respmidents. I ORDER ORAL (Passed on 11 day of Decemben, 2009) Leamed counsel appearing for the rpetitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to pursue his representation dated 22.10.2009 (Annexure P/S) pending before the Sub Divisionai Officer, Simga, District Raipur. i ‘2. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/respondents submits that if the representation, as aforestated is pending consideration, the same shall be considered anti decided in accordance with law, on is own merit rind perspective as expeditiously es possible. 3. Consequentiy, the Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforestated liberty and observations. J ‘ . sd/_ Ii E Satish K. Agnihotri.‘ (r Judge Amit