THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.33852 of 2010 Dated 12th October, 2011 Between: B.Chowdari Rao …Petitioner And The Assistant Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Nandigama, Krishna District and another …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Gaddam Srinivas Counsel for respondents: AGP for Transport The Court made the following: ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to set aside proceedings bearing R.No.16601/A/2010, dated 18.12.2010, of respondent No.2, whereby he has suspended the permit of the petitioner’s vehicle. At the hearing, it has come out that in pursuance of the interim order granted by this Court, the petitioner has paid a sum of Rs.18,500/- and got the seized vehicle released and that the period of 120 days for which the permit was suspended has also expired. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of the above facts, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. The learned counsel, however, stated that on the ground of pendency of the writ petition, the respondents have not been issuing NOC for transfer of the vehicle in favour of the person to whom the petitioner has sold the vehicle. Now that the writ petition is being disposed of and the petitioner has paid the penalty, there can be no objection for the respondents to consider the petitioner’s application for grant of NOC. Subject to the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.Nos.42877/2010, 29985/11 and W.V.M.P.No.726 of 2011 are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 12th October, 2011 VGB