In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh … COCP No. 1603 of 2008 Date of decision: August 17, 2009 Sarbjit Kaur d/o Sardul Singh ..Petitioner Versus Arpit Shukla, Senior Superintendent of Police, Jalandhar ..Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg Present: Mr. Ravi Malhotra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Sahu, AAG, Punjab for the respondent. ,,, Rakesh Kumar Garg, J(Oral) The grievance of the petitioner in this case is that vide order 9.6.2008 passed in Civil Revision No. 3328 of 2008 (Annexure P-2), the Senior Superintendent of Police, Jalandhar was directed to take appropriate action in accordance with law on the application filed by the petitioner to facilitate him to harvest his crop. However, respondent has taken no action on his complaint. In response to the show cause notice issued by this court, reply by way of short affidavit of Shri Pawan Kumar Rai, IPS, Senior Superintendent of Police, Narcotic Cell Amritsar and Superintendent of Police, CID, Amritsar on behalf of the respondent has been filed, wherein it has been submitted that on the basis of the application of the petitioner, an inquiry was conducted by the SHO Police Station Adampur and during the inquiry, both the parties were called and after making the inquiry, the SHO Police Station Adampur submitted his report on 10.7.2008(Annexure R-1) and thus an appropriate action has been taken on the application of the petitioner. It is also necessary to refer to the joint statements made by members of the Panchayat which is attached as Annexure R-3, wherein it has been submitted that Sarbhjit Kaur had not intentionally harvested the wheat crop and the panchayat members have never prevented her from harvesting the crop. In view of the aforesaid documents on record, I am not inclined to proceed further with this petition. Rule discharged. August 17, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) nk JUDGE