IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 29TH AUGUST 2008 / 7TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 11943 of 2004(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- RAJI.K., AGED 20, S/O.KARUPPU SWAMY, COMBYLINE, CHALIKALA P.O., KUPPUKUZHY, PUNALLOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.J.SHEEBA MARIAM SRI.A.J.VARGHESE RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY, SC/ST, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. STATE OF TEMILNADU, REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, CHENNAI, TAMILNADU. 3. VIGILANCE OFFICER, VIGILANCE CELL, DIRECTORATE OF KIRTHADS, KOZHIKODE - 17. 4. THASILDAR, PATHANAPURAM. 5. TAHSILDAR, THOOTHUKUDI TALUK (TUTICORIN), TAMIL NADU. 6. VILLAGE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, SANKARAPARI VILLAGE, THOOTHUKUDI TALUK, TAMIL NADU STATE. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.NOBLE MATHEW FOR R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.11943/2004 APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS EXT.P1:- COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DT. 22.8.2001 ISSUED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER, RAJAGIRI RUBBER AND PRODUCE COMPANY LTD. EXT.P2:- COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DT. 21.10.2001 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, SHANKARAPERI VILLAGE. EXT.P3:- COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DT. 7.1.2004 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, SHANKARAPERI V ILLAGE. EXT.P4:- COPY OF THE REPORT ALONG WITH THE DOCUMENTS RELIED BY THE KIRTADS DT. 26.6.01. EXT.P5:- COPY OF THE CASTE CERTIFICATE NO.G4 10691/01 DT. 26.12.2001 ISSUED BY THE TAHSILDAR, PATHANAPURAM. EXT.P6:- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER'S MOTHER BEFORE THE DIRECTOR , KIRTHADS DT. 7.1.2002. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE tss KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.11943 of 2004 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 29th August, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioner is aggrieved by Exts.P4 and P5 in the matter of reservation. In view of the intervening developments, in case the petitioner has still any grievance left, it is for the petitioner to approach the first respondent, in which case appropriate action in accordance with law will be taken in the matter expeditiously. The writ petition is disposed of as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. tgs KURIAN JOSEPH, J ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.11943 of 2004 ---------------------------------------------- J U D G M E N T Dated 29th August, 2008.