IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** C.W.P. No.12322 of 2011 Date of Decision:15.07.2011 Prem Singh .....Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Ms. J.J. Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularisation of his services as per notification dated 15.12.2006 issued by the Punjab Government. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is doing the job of Mali since 6.1.1991 with Punjab Mandi Board regularly without any break and is entitled for regularisation of his services as per policy issued by the State Government. The similarly situated employee approached this Court by way of filing C.W.P. No.10535 of 2011 titled as Tirath Singh v. State of Punjab & Others, wherein directions have been issued to the respondents to decide the case of the petitioner in terms of directions issued in C.W.P. No.4117 of 2011 - Sukhdev Singh and others v. State of Punjab and another decided on 8.3.2011. The case of the petitioner is also at par with Tirath Singh, who filed the abovesaid petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that many representations have been moved by the petitioner but no action has been taken so far. The C.W.P. No.12322 of 2011 -2- petitioner would be satisfied in case the directions are issued by this Court to decide the representation moved by the petitioner which is annexed as Annexure P-3 with the petition within some stipulated period. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have perused the record carefully. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and the fact that similarly situated employee has also filed C.W.P. No.10535 of 2011, which has been disposed of by this Court on 3.6.2011 and directions have been issued to the respondents to decide the representation moved by the petitioner in view of the judgment delivered in Sukhdev Singh's case (supra), without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents No.1 and 2 to decide the representation moved by the petitioner, which is annexed as Annexure P-3 with the petition and take necessary action in accordance with the judgment of Sukhdev Singh's case (supra) decided on 8.3.2011 within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order and in case the petitioner is found entitled for the relief claimed in the representation, necessary relief be granted within a period of two months thereafter. July 15, 2011 ( DAYA CHAUDHARY ) renu JUDGE