IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 24TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 28513 of 2010(L) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- 1. MANILAL S., DRIVER H.C. T-1744, H.Q.COY, CITY A.R.CAMP, NANDAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SURESH V., DRIVER P.C. T-3101, H.Q.COY, CITY A.R.CAMP, NANDAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. ARAVINDAKSHAN K., DRIVER P.C. T-3105, H.Q.COY, CITY A.R.CAMP, NANDAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. SURENDRAN V., DRIVER P.C. T-3098, H.Q.COY, CITY A.R.CAMP, NANDAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. ROMILAN N., DRIVER P.C. T-4155, H.Q.COY, CITY A.R.CAMP, NANDAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6. STEPHEN Y., DRIVER P.C. T-3447, H.Q.COY, CITY A.R.CAMP, NANDAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 7. MADHU KUMAR S., DRIVER P.C. T-4259, H.Q.COY, CITY A.R.CAMP, NANDAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 8. JAYAN S., DRIVER P.C. T-2331, H.Q.COY, CITY A.R.CAMP, NANDAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 9. R.JAYACHANDRAN NAIR, DRIVER H.C. T-1727, H.Q.COY, CITY A.R.CAMP, NANDAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 10. RAJMOHAN K.R., DRIVER H.C. T-2294, H.Q.COY, CITY A.R.CAMP, NANDAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J. SMT.POOJA SURENDRAN W.P.(C) 28513/2010 RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEADQUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CITY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.ARAVINDKUMAR BABU T.K. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/09/2010, ALONG WITH WPC. NO.28515 OF 2010 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)Nos. 28513 & 28515 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 15th day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioners in these two writ petitions entered Government service after putting in prior military service. For the purpose of granting of higher grade, they want the military service also to be taken into account. According to them, they are so entitled to, in view of Exts.P7 to P9 judgments (in both writ petitions) of this court. In the above circumstances, the petitioners have filed Ext.P14 series (in both writ petitions) of representations before the 2nd respondent. Petitioners seek a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P14 series of representations (in both writ petitions) in the light of Exts.P7 to P9 judgments and Ext.P10 order passed pursuant to those judgments expeditiously. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to W.P.(C)Nos. 28513 & 28515 of 2010 -2- consider and pass orders on Ext.P14 series of representations (in both writ petitions) as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. While passing orders, the 2nd respondent shall consider the applicability of Exts.P7 to P9 judgments and Ext.P10 order to the facts of the petitioners' case. S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE shg/