PETITIOllSR IN THB HISH COQRT OF"JtJSrC&TtlRK"0^ eHiaTISG&RH ' KE.'BI^SWB.. ^/ • W.P. Ho._r A'?^ of 2001 (Under Art'icles 226 & 227, Gonstitution of Indla) SuresbKuiBar, aged abou-fc 39 years, son of Shri Sobha Rain, by occupatioa - 'I'eacber, Primary School, Kondekasa (Dondi), Bistrict: Burg (C.G.). VEfiSUS 1. State of Ciahatisgarb through the • Secceta-ryc Sche.duled Tribes, Scheduled Castes and Bacla-i'ard Classess Welfare Bepartment^ Raipur(,C «G.) . 2. Tbe eollector Diirg tC.,0.) . 1 3. The Assistant Conmaissioner* Tribal Welfare Bepartaent, Burg'(e.Q.). 4. The Slstrict: Organizer, Tribal Welfare, Collec-torate, Dtu-g (C.G.) . ^ ^i/y f'^ -•*. ' 'y •••' y^ ^ • PESZfIOH .UNQER ARTICLES 226 &_2.^,_.GONSTirHI"ION_0?ZHDI.a. ^ XI-HC-22 ^5T -^ww^, a'cil'y'is, fadlti^ '•(I'-IMT 9iRRKw.».p,.&o4/&i. an^T^ W* Sf^V <*tii* ^ift^r sii^F'renwHfgtt CM^4i'l tTRcff ^ fST^ <F»i-(^|<1 ^7 Srf^ 3D^T 25.9.2001 s Mr.SShok Das Vaishana'jra for the petitioner Mr. Rajiv Shrlvastava] The order impugned in| 23.3.2001 ( annexure P-8 ) was suspended from service this petition is dt» |by which the petltioner It is aontended that no departmental proceedings ha|ve iaeen drawn up against the writ petitioner. Shri R|ajiv Shrivastava submits that the petitioner should ceedings. Learned counsel fior the petitioner states that in respect of simllar: sons the order o£ stay has submitted that the order o( of stay in respect of othe^ face the departmental pro- y situated three other per- been granted,therefore.it is / stay in this case also should be passed. Shri Rajiv Sbrl.'<(l'astava subrnits that the order persons was as regards the departmeatal proceedin^s and not as regards a the order of suspension. It appears that ao employee can suceessfully xasist any pr^ceedings drawn up agalnst He should £ace the departnlantal proceedings. In it will be in the interestj o£ justice that the petitioner faces departmental pcoceedings. However, idiile doing so every opportunity should fcje afforded to the writ peti- 1 tioner to defend himself. | •a*' 5ff^?p^(^^^W); r3' sii^i ^r ^•<i<* 311^51 shHlch ^f^n aK^i^<ireTatt?i »A• • . . .. <3F)M[<n,41'1 flTj-ldf Tf f^si' <f<fl^.l< s|7 %pgi( sn^w In the result this with a direction that initiated at a11 it st] petltion J.s disposed of i£ proceedings are to be loald be done ininediately and the same be concl^ded a;t the .eariiest pre- ferably within a peric^d of two months from the date of receipt of thls order. Heedless to say that i£ aggrlaved by 4ny order to be passed the competent authori4y»the petitioner is at liberty to appiroaeh tl^e appropriate forum. Sd/- Chief Justice Mlrdo_:_^Cio^ ,1... 1-, lt<y!iiKK^tK: