IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42495 of 2011 Rahul Kumar Singh Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 14.12.2011. Heard senior learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 364(A) of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is that son of the informant was abducted and subsequently extortion demand of Rs. 15 lacs was made. In 164 Cr. P.C. statement as contained in Annexure-4, the victim named one Dhiraj Kumar Mishra but the petitioner was not named by the victim. Dhiraj Kumar Mishra in his 164 Cr. P.C. statement has named one Rahul Pandey as leader of the abducting team. It is submitted that the petitioner’s name is Rahul Kumar Singh and this fact has been verified by the police also. Considering the fact that the victim has not named this petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Buxar Town P.S. Case No. 16 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Buxar, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)