THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.793 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner filed O.S.No.66 of 2008 in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Rajampet for the relief of partition and separate possession of the suit schedule property vis-à-vis defendant Nos.1 to 9. Certain other persons, who were said to be in possession of the property or otherwise concerned with it, were also impleaded. The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by the District Collector, Kadapa and the Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajampet were impleaded as defendant Nos.15 and 16. The petitioner filed I.A.No.708 of 2008 under Section 151 C.P.C. stating that Item No.21 of the suit schedule was acquired and that the compensation therefor is sought to be paid by defendant Nos.15 and 16 to defendant No.5. Therefore, he prayed for a direction to the respondents impleaded therein i.e. defendant Nos.15 and 16 to deposit the compensation awarded to the credit of the suit. The trial Court dismissed the I.A., through its order, dated 09.11.2009. Hence, this revision. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Even if what is stated by the petitioner is true, it was essential for the petitioner to implead the persons in whose favour the amount is sought to be paid. Unless the beneficiary concerned under the award is impleaded as a party to the I.A., it was not at all maintainable against the officials of the Government alone. The Land Acquisition Officer ought to have been impleaded in his official capacity. None of the respondents answers that description. Viewed from any angle, the application filed by the petitioner was untenable. Therefore, no exception can be taken to the order under revision. Hence, the civil revision petition is dismissed. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to file an application, which accords with law and relevant facts. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:02.03.2010. kdl