SBCWP NO.5910/10. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5910/2010. Poonamaram Meena Versus State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur & Anr. Date of Order:- April 29, 2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Ashok Kumar Bansal for the petitioner. ***** BY THE COURT:- This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 17/3/2010 by which, his request for withdrawing of his resignation has been rejected by the respondents. Learned counsel submitted that even after eight days of acceptance of his resignation, petitioner applied for withdrawal thereof but respondents mechanically rejected the application. Perusal of the impugned-order shows that petitioner not only applied for voluntary retirement which was accepted but also deposited one month salary in advance. That was done by the petitioner because he wanted to contest the panchayat elections and due to disqualification attached that he held the office of profit and while holding such office of profit, he would not be eligible to hold such office. That disqualification was removed only when SBCWP NO.5910/10. 2 his letter of resignation was accepted but after having contested the elections and lost therein, petitioner applied for withdrawal of his resignation. Once the resignation letter has been accepted and petitioner deposited the amount of notice pay and on that basis contested election and loosing therein, facility of retaining in service cannot be granted to him. No such law or rule has been cited by the petitioner to show that once letter of resignation has been accepted depositing one month's notice pay and after loosing the panchayat elections, his resignation should have been revoked. I do not find any infirmity in impugned order. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil