mwmm mm ’ , ’ 111200 mam-(W) WW'éwm Single Bench: Hontle Mr‘ Jushce Dhlrendro Mlshra) (Peflhon U/A 226 of he ConsTI‘ruTIon of India) Pe'ri‘rioner Dwarl a Prusa Kosar‘e Son of Samay Lal aged abou‘r 41 year's Assus’ran‘r , Government Primary School, Par ih, Block 'Chhuriya, Disfricf Rajna dgaon (CG) RESPONDENTs 1. 5m e of ChhaT’risgarh, Through, The Sec efary' Department of Educafion, Ma ralaya, D.'K.5. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) r 2. Th Disfric‘r Educafion Officer, Raj andgaon, Distric‘r Rajncmdgaon (6.6.) 3. Blo k1 Educa’rion Officer, Block Chhuriya, Dis ric’r Rajnandgaon (CG) 09 2 2009 Vs Mr Goufam Khefrapa! vocafe for ’rhe pe’rifioner. vf. Advoco’re for the Sfa’re. Mr. Ajay Dwivedi, Dy. Heard. The pefifioner, who w s initially appointed on fhe posf of Assisfam‘ Teacher in the chool Educal'ion Depar’rmenf of The Sfafe Government is rieved by fhe acfion of fhe responden’rs in no’r adding wo advance incremem‘s in his d ‘, r e d e d o g mm ’ H1200 mwm ‘ mm (Wu) L ‘ mm fs‘am *mm salary even Though he did 1' is D.Ed. Examination a‘r’ his‘ own expenses before joining on flhe pos’r of Assis’ron’r Teacher. Learned counsel for'ine petitioner submits that the petitioner's case is squarely covered by the decision of this in W.P. (s) No.591/200$ beitween Preetam Singh Parihar and: others Versus The state of Ci this Court and this petition m direction given by this Court in The above fact has not for the State. In view of above, the in: hattisgarh and another decided by 1y be disposed of in terms of the the aforesaid matter. been disputed b Iearned counsel y :tant petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondentl‘s to moke payment of two advance increments to the petitioner within a period two months fro be subject to all verifications! pleaded in the petition. . No order asto costs. from the date of his appointment 'n today. However, this order shall nade by the State regarding facts A'k ’i i. s‘d/L Dhirendra Mishriar i Judge