IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 19TH AUGUST 2011 / 28TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 8927 of 2009(I) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ 1. SAJESH KUMAR.N.K.,S/O.M.G.KUMARAN NAIR, AGED 36,NELLIKUNNEL,KOODAPPALAM P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. CHANDRAKUMAR.K., S/O.KUMARAN VAIDYAN,AGED 42, SREENIVAS,C.S.NAGAR,VADDY, KOLLAM-13. BY ADV. SMT.R.RANJINI RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. RAJIV GANDHI CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF EDUCATION,SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, REP.BY ITS DIRECTOR,POOJAPURA,NEAR CENTRAL JAIL COMPOUND,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PRESENTING RAJIV GANDHI CENTRE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY. 2. KERALA STATE COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT, REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN,SASTHABHAVAN,PATTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SECRETARY, SCIENCE,TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE SECRETARY, HEALTH DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. tss W.P.(C) NO.8927/2009 6. UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, REP.BY THE REGISTRAR OF THE UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 7. UNION OF INDIA,REP.BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,DEPARTMENT OF BIO TECHNOLOGY, TECHNOLOGY BHAVAN,NEW MEHRAULI ROAD, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA,NEW DELHI-110016. 8. PARA MEDICAL COUNCIL, HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,SECRETARIAT, REP.BY THE CHAIRMAN. R1 BY ADVS.SRI.RAM MOHAN.G. , SRI.G.P.SHINOD, SRI.MANU V. R2 BY ADVS. SRI.P.A.AHAMED, SC, K.S.C.T.E, SRI.GEORGE ZACHARIAH,SC,KSCTE. R3,4& 5 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.M.H.HANILKUMAR R6 BY ADV. SRI.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, SC KERALA UTY. R7 BY ADVS. SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASG OF INDIA , SRI.T.P.M.IBRAHIM KHAN,ASST.S.G OF INDIA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 8927 OF 2009 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of August , 2011 J U D G M E N T Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/- [true copy] P.S. to Judge