IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 601 OF 2007 SMT. YASHODA SHIRODKAR REPRESENTED BY ATTORNEY MR. DWARKANATH ALIAS RAJENDRA S SHIRODKAR AND 4 ORS., ... Petitioners Versus SHRI. ARJUN SHIRODKAR ... Respondent Mr. J. Godinho, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sudin Usgaonkar, Advocate for the respondent. Coram:- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. Date:- 19th September, 2008 P.C. 1. The order passed by the Court below is an interlocutory order, which says that the application filed by the respondent-original plaintiff is maintainable. There is no reason to interfere with such an order, more so, when there is a remedy available to the petitioners to challenge it while assailing the final order on the application preferred by the respondent, invoking powers of the trial Court under Order 39, Rule 2A of the Code of Civil Procedure Code. 2. Keeping all pleas and contentions open, with regard to challenging the order on maintainability, at that stage, this petition stands disposed of. S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. ssm.