IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 2ND DECEMBER 2008 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 RP.No. 1270 of 2008(A) ---------------------- REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -------------------------------- P.V.ABRAHAM, S/O.IDICHANDI VARGHESE, PUTHENCHIRAYIL HOUSE, ATTACHACKAL P.O., KONNI, REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, SRI.RATHEESH BABU.K., S/O.V.N.KUTTAPPAN NAIR, KALLUKKATTU HOUSE, MANGARAM, KONNI. BY ADV. SRI.SATHISH NINAN RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. KONNI GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KONNI, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 2. THE SECRETARY, KONNI GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KONNI, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. SHRI.SIBY MATHEW, SC THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== R.P.No.1270 of 2008 ================== Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2008 O R D E R This review petition is filed by the petitioner in the writ petition for review of the last sentence in the judgment, which reads thus: “... In order to enable the petitioner to do so, I direct that the interim order would continue to be in force for one more month.” Now there is a serious dispute as to whether by the time I passed the interim order, construction was already complete. I cannot decide that question without taking evidence. Therefore, I leave that question to be agitated by the petitioner in the suit which he proposes to file. The review petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2