CRM No.M 1985 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M 1985 of 2010 Date of decision : March 09, 2010 Manoj and another ....Petitioners versus State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L.N. MITTAL Present: Mr. Chankaya Pandit, Advocate, for the petitiners. Mr. Narendeer Singh, DAG, Haryana *** L.N. MITTAL, J. (ORAL) This is second petition for regular bail of Manoj son of Baldev Singh and Anoop son of Sh. Jai Singh in case FIR No.227 dated 01.06.2008 under Sections 302, 307, 323, 506, 148, 149 109 of IPC and Sections 25,27, of Arms Act, of Police Station Chandni Bagh, Panipat. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that petitioner No.1 is in custody since 29.09.2008 and petitioner No.2 since 03.06.2008. It was also pointed out that after dismissal of first CRM No.M 1985 of 2010 -2- bail petition of the petitioners by this Court vide order dated 08.07.2009, no prosecution witness has been examined. Learned State Counsel on instructions from ASI Piare Lal submitted that petitioners' co-accused Sunny absented from the court on 06.04.2009 and was ultimately arrested on 29.07.2009 and another co-accused Joginder Singh absented on 29.10.2009 and he was declared as proclaimed offender on 24.12.2009, thereby resulting in delay in the trial. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and prosecution is also directed to expedite its evidence. However, no fresh ground for bail is made out. Dismissed. March 09, 2010 (L.N. MITTAL) vcgarg Judge CRM No.M 1985 of 2010 -3-