IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30345 of 2010 DHANESHI CHAUDHARY @ PAPPU CHAUDHARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 03.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 17.11.2009 in a case registered under Section395 of the Indian Penal Code. There is no recovery from the petitioner and the petitioner’s name surfaced on the confession of Ayodhya Manjhi. The similarly situated accused Bhola Yadav has been granted privilege of bail in Cr. Misc. No. 34580 of 2009. Considering the aforesaid submission, let the petitioner, namely, Dhaneshi Chaudhary @ Pappu Chaudhari be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Trial Court i.e. the Court of F.T.C. II, Siwan in connection with Sessions Trial. No. 51 of 2010, on the conditions that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the Court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the Court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse and that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and will not delay the trial and if he 2 fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner then his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Praveen ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)