1 arbp86-11g vai IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.86 OF 2011 L & T Finance Limited ....Petitioner V/s. Prabhakar Krishna Parab & Anr. ....Respondents WITH ARBITRATION PETITION NO.244 OF 2011 L & T Finance Limited ....Petitioner V/s. M/s.G.S. Earthmovers & Anr. ....Respondents WITH ARBITRATION PETITION NO.245 OF 2011 L & T Finance Limited ....Petitioner V/s. Mr.Vipulkumar L. Mishar & Anr. ....Respondents WITH ARBITRATION PETITION (LODGING) NO.124 OF 2011 L & T Finance Limited ....Petitioner V/s. Narnath V. Gandal & Ors. ....Respondents WITH ARBITRATION PETITION (LODGING) NO.126 OF 2011 L & T Finance Limited ....Petitioner V/s. Vasant T. Updahe & Anr. ....Respondents WITH ARBITRATION PETITION (LODGING) NO.127 OF 2011 L & T Finance Limited ....Petitioner 2 arbp86-11g V/s. Popat D. Bade & Anr. ....Respondents WITH ARBITRATION PETITION (LODGING) NO.132 OF 2011 L & T Finance Limited ....Petitioner V/s. Paijambar N. Makandar & Anr. ....Respondents WITH ARBITRATION PETITION (LODGING) NO.207 OF 2011 L & T Finance Limited ....Petitioner V/s. Hira Bhai M. Rabari & Ors. ....Respondents WITH ARBITRATION PETITION (LODGING) NO.208 OF 2011 L & T Finance Limited ....Petitioner V/s. Mrs.Ruby D. Upadhyay & Ors. ....Respondents WITH ARBITRATION PETITION (LODGING) NO.209 OF 2011 L & T Finance Limited ....Petitioner V/s. Mrs.Falguni R. Raval & Anr. ....Respondents WITH ARBITRATION PETITION (LODGING) NO.210 OF 2011 L & T Finance Limited ....Petitioner V/s. M/s.Parwati Enterprise & Anr. ....Respondents WITH ARBITRATION PETITION (LODGING) NO.212 OF 2011 L & T Finance Limited ....Petitioner V/s. 3 arbp86-11g Pradip M. Ladkani & Ors. ....Respondents WITH ARBITRATION PETITION (LODGING) NO.226 OF 2011 L & T Finance Limited ....Petitioner V/s. Ashok Kumar & Ors. ....Respondents Ms.Disha Karambar for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 25TH APRIL, 2011. P.C. :- 1. These are petitions under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. 2. Respondent No.1 in each of the petitions is the borrower. The other respondents are either the borrowers or the guarantors. The petitioner and respondent No.1 in each of the petitions have entered into the loan cum hypothecation agreements. The dues thereunder were secured by the hypothecation of the vehicles referred to in each of the agreements. 3. The respondents have remained absent, though served. There is no affidavit in reply. Prima-facie the amounts are due and payable and the same are secured by the hypothecation of the said vehicles. 4. In the circumstances, the above petitions are disposed of by the following order :- i). The petitions are made absolute in terms of prayers (a), except 4 arbp86-11g the two portions bracketed in red. The petitions are also made absolute in terms of prayer (c). The order shall be complied with within two weeks of being served a copy of this order in writing addressed to the Court Receiver and through the petitioner’s advocate. ii). Till the Court Receiver takes possession in each of the matters, each petitions are made absolute in terms of prayer (d).