3^^^n?n^r, ®Tf1y*i<o,Ri<rti^^<: VWvff VhW* an^r^rtow wrsn^rsCTW an^nisW (yii-i«<itr) •'W^ 200 ^giW ^ltel SII^T «Ji|f<-l4-1XltX-fKfa-d <^I^K ^gffiTOsii^r PET!T!QNER/ Ciaimant before ths Tribuna! IV.P.(C) N0.387S/2007 Arun Kumar Kaush.'k, aged about 36 years, S/o Shri Gajju Ram Kaushik, R/o Laksnagar Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS Nom-Appiicant before ths Tr'buna! ~r~5 Samimultsh Khan, S/o Shri Aiimaitah Khan, R/o Near New Narendra Talkies Pratap Gram Para, Jagdalpur, D'strict Jagdaipur (C.G.) Ths Oriente! '"surance Co. Ltd. Madina Buiidinfl, Jaii Road Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETIT10N UND! Appearance: Ms. Varsha Tiwari ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF !,*iD!A Counse! for the Detitioner. D.8.: HON'BLE SHRJ L HO?»'BLESHR! S|i?,!L KUMAR SiNHA. JJ. L.C. Bhadoo, J. BHADOO. ifiQ ft-f ^ift^ot ^VO.V 1 .&V^/Uf This Writ Petition f India has been preferred led under Articte 227 of the Constitirtjo.n of by th$ petitioner/c!aimant questioning the legality, correctness of t!|©order dated 30.03.2007 passed by the Twelfth Addjtionat Motor ^cident Claims Tnbuna! (FTC), Raipur (C.G.) jn Claim Case No.122/2q06, whereby, the lea.med Tri.bunal has held that the Tribuna! at Raip^r has no jurisdiction to entertain the said 3(1^1 ysi ftti.'n 'dsff 3n^9? 8»^ 3^^ SEfTq^pT, ^tffTO, ft<?iKl^ iimw *NI*^..ML^L^I^•HT. 200 an^riraq? (.^Wf •pEtIIWtrfW3^^ 2- *i'<fi-i<il;ilinaf'if.fel<il <f»i^H ^TiffiiHan^r Cta.im Case as the accident took place in Kanker jurisdiction and a.iso the daimant is a permanertit resident of Kanker. The Tribuna! further ordered that the cia.im caste be returned to the ciaimant as DSF the provisions of Order 7 Rute competent court having juris We have .oerused thd 10 nf CPC to present the same before the dictton to entertain the Glalm casg. jmpugned order and th®ciaim petition. We do not find afiy ^tegality or infjrmity jn the impugned order and the same does npt ^4ffer from any 8rror of jurisdiction a-s the claimant in his evidence b^ore the Tribuna! has categoricaJly stated that he is a resident of Ka.nk^r. He came to Raipur for taking treatment a.nd was temporarily livjng ^t the resirtence of his reiative for taking treatment, therefore, this wr|t petition is !iab!e to ha dismissed at the admission stase itself. it is macle dear that how the Searnecj Tribunal sha.!l return the clajm case aiong with evjde^ice recorded and other documents fo the claima-nt for presenting the s^-me before the Tribuna! having jurisdjction and the cialmant sha!! be enl Tribunalhaving jurisdjction v^ handjng over the e!ajm cai itjed to nresent the claim case before tha Ithjn a period of 15 days from the dat®of ,e .to the daimant. The c!aimant must approach the tearned Trjbuital for reGeiving the c!aim case wjthln a period of 15 days from procedure as envisaged anrt the Trjbuna! at Rainur sha!l fo!!ow the r Order 7 Rute 10 & 10 A of CPC. Sd/- SunilKumarSinha Judge