1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 2625 OF 2009 IN CRI. REVN. APPLN. NO.: 106 OF 2009 Kantilal S/o Dagduram Muthiyan Versus Rahul S/o Harilal Munot and another. *** Mr. P. F. Patni, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs. B. R. Khekale, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. *** 1. Heard both the counsel extensively. The applicant herein/ original complainant seeks to withdraw Rs.50,000/- deposited by Respondent No.1 Rahul which is for the role of the Respondent Rahul under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. During the course of submission counsel informs that he has been blessed with money decree against the accused in which also the directions are not complied with. However, Mr. Deshmukh disputes of any order. Considering the nature of accusations, I do not see any impediment in allowing to withdraw the amount of Rs. 50,000/-. 2. Applicant herein to withdraw Rs.50,000/- deposited in this Court on his undertaking to reimburse if he looses the matter. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:05/08/2009. ans/2625