IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO.656 OF 2009 Dt.18.1.2010 Between: S. Saritha … Appellant And Dr. N.T.R. University of Health Sciences Represented by its Convenor/ Chair Person of Selection Committee 2009-2010, A.P., Vijayawada and another … Respondents Counsel for the Appellant: Ms. G. Sudha Counsel for Respondent No.1: Sri D.V. Nagarjuna Babu Counsel for Respondent No.2: The Advocate General THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO.656 OF 2009 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy) This Writ Appeal is filed against order dt.06.05.2009 in W.P.M.P. No.12761 of 2009 in W.P. No.9826 of 2009. The appellant filed the above mentioned Writ Petition challenging G.O. Ms. No.15, dt.19.2.2009 whereby certain communities, which were included in B.C. “D” category, have been shifted to Sl. No.1 of B.C. “A” category. The learned Single Judge declined to grant suspension of the said order. Therefore, the appellant filed this Writ Appeal. By order dt.13.5.2009, a Division Bench of this Court comprising V. Eswaraiah and B. Chandra Kumar, JJ, suspended the above mentioned G.O., on the basis of order dt.29.04.2009 in W.P. No.2122 of 2009 passed by a Division Bench. It is represented by the learned Counsel appearing for both the parties that a Division Bench of this Court allowed W.P. No.2122 of 2009 and batch by judgment dt.03.11.2009. Inasmuch as the Writ Appeal is filed against an interlocutory order, a Division Bench has already granted interim suspension of the G.O., and another Division Bench has already allowed W.P. No.2122 of 2009 and batch, setting aside the G.O., no further orders need be passed in the Writ Appeal. While Ms. Sudha, learned Counsel for the appellant, complained that the interim order has not been given effect to, Sri D.V. Nagarjuna Babu, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.1 – University submitted that the interim order has been complied with and has accordingly worked itself out. As the Contempt Case No.1094 of 2009, filed by the appellant complaining of non-compliance with the interim order passed in the Writ Appeal, is pending, we refrain from expressing any opinion on this aspect. The Writ Appeal is accordingly disposed of without prejudice to the right of the appellant to pursue the above mentioned Contempt Case. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Appeal, W.A.M.P. No.1293 of 2009, filed by the appellant/petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ______________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ ______________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 18.01.2010 bnr