IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27.4.2011 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.11012 of 2011 FIRST LEASING COMPANY OF INDIA [ PETITIONER ] LTD. (REP.BY MR.S.ASHOK KUMAR-MANAGER- INDIRECT TAXATION) 749 ANNA SALAI CHENNAI-2. Vs 1 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (CT) (FORMERLY COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER) ANNA SALAI-III ASSESSMENT CIRCLE 621 ANNA SALAI "SIRE MANSION", CHENNAI-6. 2 THE APPELLATE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (CT): IV:(FAC) CHENNAI-108. [ RESPONDENTS ] Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Certiorari to call for the records on the files of the Second Respondent-herein in S.P.No.6/2011 in A.P.No.4/2011 dated 11.04.2011 preferred against the proceedings of the First Respondent in TNGST/072773/1989-90, dated 25.02.2011 and quash the proceedings of the second Respondent insofar as it relates to the direction to file a bank guarantee for a sum of Rs.1, 80,18,885/- on or before 10.05.2011. For petitioner : Mr.N.Inbarajan For respondents : Mr.R.Mahadevan AGP (T) O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader, appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. By consent of both the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing and disposal. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice if the order of the second respondent, dated 11.4.2011, made in S.P.No.6/2011 in A.P.No.4/2011, is modified, permitting the petitioner to furnish a personal bond, in respect of the balance of tax and penalty amount of Rs.1,80,18,885/-, instead of furnishing security, by way of a bank guarantee for the said amount. 4. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents has no objection for this Court passing such an order. 5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioner, as well as the respondents, the order of the second respondent, dated 11.04.2011, made in S.P.No.6/2011 in A.P.No.4/2011, is modified, permitting the authorised representative of the petitioner firm to furnish a personal bond for the penalty amount of Rs.1,80,18,885/-, instead of furnishing a bank guarantee for the said amount, within a period of two weeks from today. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. No costs. Connected M.P.No.1 of 2011 is closed. lan Sd/- Asst. Registrar //True Copy// Sub Asst. Registrar To: 1 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (CT) (FORMERLY COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER) ANNA SALAI-III ASSESSMENT CIRCLE 621 ANNA SALAI "SIRE MANSION", CHENNAI-6. 2 THE APPELLATE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (CT): IV:(FAC),CHENNAI-108. + 1 cc to Mr. Inbarajan, Advocate SR No.29054 + 1 cc to Spl Government Pleader (T), SR No.29387 TRM(CO) SR/28.4.2011 Writ Petition No.11012 of 2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/