ca? w; /@ m THE HIGH coUR'r cg wnxca'wkmmmmsm m’rN yE'm‘mN no. : M753 2007 / A. NAGBHvSANARAO PETITIONER S/OShn‘. A.L.Rao Aged about 4O Years, By Occupation, Lecturer. Govt.Model Higher Sec. School Dantewada Distt. Dantewada (C.G.) CONSTITUTION WRIT PETITION OF INDm UND§ FOR ART;CLE THE ISSUANCE 22§ OF THE OF THE DIRECTION (8L OR ORDER (Si. The to submit above as named under: Petitioners ~ most humbly and respectfully beg 1. As PART§%ULARS per mentioned OF aaove m PETIIjONERS: — in the cause title of the petition. W M n ? i ~: VERSUS: - HDENTS: 1. State of Cixhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Depaltment of Scheduled Tribe~ Scheduled Cast and Tn'able Welfare Department, Raipur D.K.S. Bhavan, Bhavan, Mantraiya Rajpur.(C.G.) , 2. The Collector Dantewada District South ' Bastar(c.G,) / 3. assistantCommissianer, Department of Triable Welfare Dantewada, Diistt. ox)?» Bastar (em / 4. Principal, G9vt.Mode1 Higher Sec. School Dantewada Distt. Dantewada @‘R HIGH COURT O CHHATHSGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (5) No. 1188 of 2007 Pefifioner : A. Nagbhusana Rao Versus Respondenfs : $1'a1e of Chhaf'risgar & ofhers Single Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agniho‘l‘ri. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Advocafe for The Pethioner. Mr. 5a?is'r1 €up1‘a, Dy. éo'v‘f. Advocaha far me respondwH/S‘ra‘r‘. ORDER (Passed on This 28“ day of February, 2007) The pefi‘rioner' is working as Lec'rurer in the governmenT schooi. In the course cf his service as Lecfurerh 'rhe peii‘ricner has ebmined B.Ed. Examinai'ion Cerfificaie on his own expenses’Vin the year‘1991 (PA?)- Learned counsel appearing .for The pe‘ri‘rioner submi‘rs Thai The quesTion involved, herein asTo wheTher The Teacher; who obTained B.Ed. ExaminaTion CerTificaTe on his own expenses, is enTiTled To Two advance incremenTs. According To iearned counsel for The peTiTioner, The peTiTioner is enTiTled To Two advance incremenTs in view of The decision of This CourT in The case of VashwanT iiumar Eharadwaj ‘v's. iv‘iunicipoi CorporaTion, burg and another {2006 (II) MPJR-C6 96}; This Cour-T in The case of Yashwam' Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal CorporaTionl Durg and another (Supra), came To The conclusion ThaT The Teachers, who had obTained B. Ed. /B.T.I. ExamingTion gerTificaTe on Their own h ; LKQ expenses, are covered by fhe circular da‘red 24.12.98 (Annexure P/7) issued by fhe Sfa'l'e Governmen‘l' of Mndhya Pmdesh. Learned counsel for fhe pe‘rifioner furiher submifs ‘rha‘r The fac‘rs and quesfion of law involved in fhe presen‘r case are squarely covered by decision of fhis Couri- in fhe case of Vashwam Kumar Bharodwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), To which learned counsel appearing for 1’he respondenfs fairly concedes and agrees wi‘rh fhe avermenf made by learned counsel appearing for 1he pefi‘rioner. Accordingly, The wri‘r pe‘iiTion is ailowed in Terms of fhe order passed in fhe case of Yoshwanf Kumar Bharodwaj Vs. Municipai Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subjec'r io verificafion of 'ihe fac‘l' as To wheTher The peTiTioner has acquired B. Ed. ExaminaTion ‘CerTificaTe on his own expenses as per The circulars daTed 24.12.1998 d 1.3.1999 and furTher wheTher he has been paid Two advance incremenTs or noT. No order as To cosTs. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri 3' Judge l ‘ l