- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.8075 OF 2004 Mr.Mihir Rale i/b Haresh Jagtiani & Associates for the Petitioner. Mr.Atul Rajadhakshya with Ms.Rajshree Shah i/b Manilal Kher Ambalal & Co. for Respondent No.3. ----------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s appearances, Court’s orders order or directions ----------------------------------------------------- ¦ ¦ ¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. ¦ DATED: 20TH APRIL,2005 P.C.: Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner. Perused the impugned order. Perused the provisions of the scheme. It is clear that the complaint need not be made by the constituent. A complaint can be made by any person or Banking Ombudsman. The only requirement is that the grievance or complaint must relate to the provisions of banking services. The final order is yet to - 2 - be made, therefore, all contentions that can be raised on merits of the matter are available to the Petitioner. In my opinion, it will not be appropriate to interfere with the impugned order at this stage. Petition is rejected. ...