IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12413 of 2010 1. ALKA KUMARI D/O BINDESHWARI PRASAD YADAV R/O VILL. AND P.O.- RAHTA, P.S.- KUMARKHAND, DISTT.- MADHEPURA 2. MINAKSHI KUMARI D/O SATYENDRA PRASAD JAISWAL R/O VILL. AND P.O.- RAHTA, P.S.- KUMARKHAND, DISTT.- MADHEPURA 3. SUBHASH CHANDRA YADAV S/O RAM KRIPAL PRASAD YADAV R/O VILL.- BRAITH, VIA- MANGWAR, P.S.- BASNAHI, DISTT.- SAHARSA 4. RABINDRA CHOUDHARY S/O DINA NATH CHOUDHARY R/O VILL.- BHAWANIPUR RAHTA, P.S.- KUMARKHAND, DISTT.- MADHEPURA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE-CUM-COLLECTOR, MADHEPURA 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, MADHEPURA 5. THE MEMBER, DISTRICT TEACHER APPOINTMENT APPELLATE AUTHORITY, MADHEPURA 6. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER KUMARKHAND, MADHEPURA 7. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, KUMARKHAND, MADHEPURA 8. THE MUKHIA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAHTA KUMARKHAND, DISTT.- MADHEPURA 9. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY RAHTA GRAM PANCHAYAT, KUMARKHAND, MADHEPURA ----------- 2. 30.03.2011 It is with regularity that in various writ applications including the present one deliberately the necessary parties are not being added as respondents, even though they may be directly affected by any decision which may be taken by the court in favour of the petitioner. Admitted position is that the order under challenge was passed at the behest of private 2 respondents before the District Teacher Appointment Appellate Authority but counsel for the petitioner has failed to implead them as parties. In the opinion of this Court in absence of necessary parties the writ application cannot be maintained so it is dismissed. Devendra/ ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)