IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 14TH JUNE 2011 / 24TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 15929 of 2011(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MUHAMMEDALI.P,AGED 18 YEARS, S/O.SOPPY HAJI,THAZHEPOYIL,PERODE.P.O, PIN:673504. BY ADV. SRI.PULIKKOOL ABUBACKER SRI.ZUBAIR PULIKKOOL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695301. 2. THE DIRECTOR,BOARD OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION HOUSING BOARD BUILDINGS,SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695301. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.15929/2011-M ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 14th day of June, 2011 J U D G M E N T It is a case where the petitioner is a Plus-II student of 2008-10 batch. He failed in the public examination conducted in March, 2010. He was studying in the MIM Higher Secondary School, Perode, Nadapuram. 2. The petitioner seeks for a direction to the second respondent to permit the petitioner to attend the SAY examination starting from 20/06/2011. It is pointed out that similarly placed candidates had approached this Court by filing W.P.(C) Nos.6424/2011 and 6817/2011, and this Court disposed of the same by Ext.P2 Judgment. 3. Learned Government Pleader submitted that the extended date for receipt of the application and examination fee was 10/06/2011 and the examination is to start on 20th of this month. So far no decision has also been taken to extend the period further. In that view of the matter, this Court will not be justified in directing the respondents to accept application and examination fee of the petitioner and in case, the W.P.(C). No.15929/2011 -:2:- authorities grant any extension of the period for remitting the fee and for submitting the application, the petitioner will also be entitled for the said benefit. The petitioner can also move the second respondent if he is so advised in the matter. With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms \\TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE