1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 756 OF 2009 ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 941 OF 2009 Jairam Tolaji Shinde ... Appellant v/s Balasaheb Pundlik Vidhate & ors. ... Respondents Mr.G.R.Agrawal for the appellant. Mr.R.M.haridas for the respondent No.1. Mr.M.M.Sathaye for respondent Nos.2 to 7. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 1ST DECEMBER, 2009 P.C.: 1. The appeal from order is directed against the order passed by the Trial Court refusing the interim relief to the appellant. The Trial Court has held that it was unbelievable that the entire consideration paid by the appellant to the respondent No.1 for the suit plot. The Trial Court has also held that there was nothing on record to indicate that respondent No.1, who had allegedly signed the agreement of 2 sale, was in fact acting as a Karta of the family. The Trial Court has therefore refused the interim relief to the appellant. 2. In my view, the Trial Court has not committed any error by refusing the interim relief. It has considered the case of the appellants and the material on record while refusing the application for interim relief. 3. Appeal from order stands dismissed along with the civil application. ..... 3