IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA FRIDAY, THE 11TH JUNE 2010 / 21ST JYAISTHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 3128 of 2010() ----------------------------- (CRIME NO256/2010 OF KAZHAKOOTTAM POLICE STATION) : PETITIONER ------------------------------ SUJITH S.L, AGED 24, S/O.SURENDRAN SOPANAM, AVUKULAM, CHEMPAZHANTHI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 587. BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW KURIAKOSE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- STATE OF KERALA (CRIME NO.307/2009 OF KAZHAKOOTTAM POLILCE STATION, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.HEMA, J ----------------------- B.A No.3128 OF 2010 -------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of June 2010 ORDER This petition is for anticipatory bail. 2. The alleged offences are under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 332, 326 and 307 IPC. According to prosecution, there was a quarrel between petitioner and de facto complainant who was working as Security in a petrol bunk, when de facto complainant asked petitioner to move the car to another place. Thereafter, petitioners assaulted de facto complainant and he sustained injuries. Three persons standing on the other side of the road came to the spot, while the car was sped against them and they also sustained injuries. One of the persons standing on the other side of the road was a Police Constable. Several persons were injured in the incident. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that there was only a minor quarrel between de facto complainant and first accused who was driving the car. No person sustained any serious injuries. De facto complainant fell down and sustained some injuries. 4. This petition is opposed. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that several persons sustained injuries in the incident B.A No.3128 OF 2010 2 and considering the nature of allegations made, this is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail. 5. On going through the Case Diary and taking into account the serious nature of the allegations made and considering the submissions made on behalf of petitioners, I do not think that this is a fit case to grant anticipatory bail. Petition is dismissed. K.HEMA JUDGE vdv