IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1313 of 2006 SUKHDEO SINGH @ LOHA SINGH Versus SRI RAMDAS SINGH YADAV ----------- 3 12.11.2008 Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission and is allowed to delete the name of opposite party No.1 at his own risk. On merits, this Court would not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order inasmuch as the petitioner does not fall in the category of either donee or the donor. That being so, the suit being confined to validity of a deed of gift, the impleadment of the petitioner was not at all required and that has been precisely done by the Court below while passing the impugned order. The impugned order, therefore, does not suffer from any jurisdictional error and accordingly, this Civil Revision application is dismissed. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)