IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 10903 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION: December 1, 2011 Mandeep Kaur & another .....Petitioners VERSUS State of Punjab & another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. A.S. Jattana, Addl. A.G., Punjab, for the State. Mr. P.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate for respondent fNo.2. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. Petitioners Mandeep Kaur and Rajinder Kaur have filed this petition for quashing of complaint dated 12.8.2005, Sessions Case No.17/18.5.2010 and so also the summoning order dated 10.4.2008. Counsel for respondent No.2 points out that Rajinder Kaur had already filed a revision before the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Ropar, which was dismissed on 3.9.2009. Without disclosing this fact, the present petition for quashing has been filed by the petitioners. Certified copy of the order dated 3.9.2009 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Crl. Misc. No. M- 10903 of 2011 -2- Ropar, has also been placed before me. Counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh petition on behalf of both the petitioners. I am not making any comment on the right of the petitioners to file fresh petition for quashing for the same cause in the background as noticed. The aspect of maintainability of the same petition would be seen if and when it is filed. That plea would have to be dealt with in accordance with law. Dismissed as withdrawn. December 01, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE