IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 18563 of 2010 Date of decision: 30.08.2010 Gursewak Singh and others ........ Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. R S Sidhu, Advocate for Mr. B S Bhalla, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab for the respondent State None for respondent No. 2 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) As per office report, notice issued to respondent no.2 has been received back with the report that he refused to accept the notice. Accordingly, respondent No. 2 stands served. No one has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No. 2. Thus, it appears that there is no compromise between the petitioners and respondent No. 2. Accordingly, the present petition which has been filed for quashing of FIR No. 97 dated 04.06.2008 under section 420 IPC registered at Police Station Dharamkot, District Moga on the basis of compromise, is dismissed. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge August 30, 2010 mohan