IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. ORDER 01.4.2008. S.B. CIVIL REVIEW PETITION NO.9/2008 IN S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.408/1993 Ramji Lal & Ors. Vs. Krishan Gopal & Ors. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Shri G.K. Garg } Shri Bipin Gupta}, for the appellant. Shri L.L. Gupta, for the respondent. Heard learned counsel for the parties. It has been pointed out that the clerical error has been recorded in the order of this court dated 11.2.2008 on page 2 & 3 wherein it has been mentioned that sale in favour of Budhiram has been confirmed. The submission is that in the auction by the court which was held on 12.1.1975 as per procedure provided there is no provisions for confirmation of sale. The aforesaid position is not disputed by Shri Gupta learned counsel for the respondent. It is submitted that the acceptance of the highest bid at the sale in favour of Budhiram became final. Though no formal order of confirmation was passed and nor was it objected to. In view of the above, the order dated 11.2.2008 on page 2 requires no formal correction by way of review. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner further is that this court had directed that the Tehsildar shall carry the survey on the ground of the land bearing khasra No.2381/972 which was subject matter of the sale held on 12.1.1975 and which was purchased by the respondent Budhiram and the Nazir shall on the order of the District Judge remain present during the course of the proceeding for demarcation of the land bearing khasra No.2381/972 and as soon as the demarcation is completed, the Nazir shall hand over the possession of the khasra No.2381/972 to the auction purchaser. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the formal order in this behalf are required to be passed by the learned District Judge and the Nazir cannot be permitted to hand over the possession without formal order of the District Judge. So far as the above contention of the learned counsel is concerned the order dated 11.2.2008 was passed on the suggestion made by the learned counsel that the District Judge be directed to make a requisition to the Collector to depute the Tehsildar for carrying out the demarcation of khasra No.2381/972 before handing over possession. Also keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case which commenced in the year 1963, it was ordered that as soon as the demarcation is made by the Tehsildar of khasra No.2381/972 the Tehsildar and the Nazir who shall be present under the order of the District Judge as directed by this court, along with the learned counsel and the parties, on completion of the demarcation the possession will be handed over without any further delay. In the light of the order passed by this court deciding the appeal as suggested, no further orders are required tobe passed by the District Judge after the order of this Court. It need only be added that the order dated 11.2.2008 was passed at the instance suggestion given by the learned counsel for the parties and this is recorded on page 2 of the order itself. In view of the above the impugned order calls for no review by this court. The review petition is dismissed. (DALIP SINGH),J. Ramchandrkhatri,PS