1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR L.P.A. NO. 541/10 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2702 OF 1999. Wasudeo Laxman Thengdi .vs. Executive Engineer & another Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. N.N. Thengre, Advocate for appellant, CORAM : S.A. BOBDE & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 16, 2010. This is a Letters Patent Appeal preferred against the judgment of the learned Single Judge of this Court refusing to interfere with the concurrent findings of both the Labour Court and the Industrial Court below. Mr. N.N. Thengre, learned Advocate for appellant, submitted that it is obvious from the record that there is non- compliance with the provisions of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act and, therefore, the Court below ought to have set aside the retrenchment on this ground alone. However, we find from a perusal of the findings of the Courts below that the Section 25-F has been found to have 2 been violated in the sense that the correct amount of compensation was not offered because of a mistake on the part of the employer in calculation of the amount. The Industrial Court which agreed with the Labour Court has directed the respondent employer to pay the difference to which the appellant is entitled by the order dated 4.5.1999. Mr. N.N. Thengre, learned Advocate for appellant, relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Anoop Sharma .vs. Executive Engineer, Public Health Division No.1, Panipat (Haryana) reported in 2010(5) Mh.L.J. 244. That judgment, however, has no application to the facts of the present case since the case did not involve a mistake in calculation. The appeal is dismissed. Judge Judge J.