1 CAW No.1427/11 mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1427 of 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1365 of 2010 Manohar Revadmal Gupta ... Applicant versus Vasanta Dhondu Asvale and ors. ... Respondents ... Mr. J.S. Deo for the applicant. Mr.S.N.Chandrachood for the respondents. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 18th July 2011 P.C. 1. This civil application is filed for expediting the hearing of the writ petition and fixing the peremptory date for hearing of the writ petition. There is also a prayer for stay of further proceedings in Special Civil Suit No.1481 pending before the Civil Court, Sr. Division Pune. As regards the first prayer, after having heard learned counsel for the parties, I am not satisfied that this is a fit case for hearing the writ petition which is filed in the year 2011 out of turn and by fixing a peremptory date. Petitions which are several years old filed by senior citizens and expedited by orders of the 2 CAW No.1427/11 court are still pending. As such, it is not possible to hear the present writ petition by fixing the peremptory date for hearing. Hence, prayer clause (a) cannot be granted. As regards prayer clause (b), by an order dated 24 June 2010 while issuing the Rule, tis court had rejected the prayer for stay of the suit and in fact had observed : “It is clarified that there shall be no stay for hearing of the suit”. 2. No change in the circumstances is made out. The petitioner is the plaintiff in the suit and he should be interested in expeditious hearing of his own suit. Hence, prayer clause (b) also cannot be granted. Civil Application is rejected. (D.G.KARNIK, J)