1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.02.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION (PD) No.308 of 2011 and MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.1 of 2011 Ramasamy Thevar .. Petitioner Vs. Pichammal .. Respondent Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decretal order dated 29.01.2011 passed in Interlocutory Application No.38 of 2011 in Interlocutory Application No.513 of 2010 in Original Suit No.186 of 2010 by the District Munsif Court, Sivakasi. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Athimoolapandian Mr.R.Aravindan, (For Caveator) ORDER This Civil Revision Petition has been directed against the order dated 29.01.2011 passed in Interlocutory Application No.38 of 2011 in Interlocutory Application No.513 of 2010 in Original Suit No.186 of 2010 by the District Munsif Court, Sivakasi. 2. The respondent herein as plaintiff has instituted Original Suit No.186 of 2010 on the file of the Court below for the relief of permanent injunction, wherein the present revision petitioner has been shown as first defendant. During pendency of the same, the respondent/plaintiff as petitioner has filed Interlocutory Application No.513 of 2010 under Order XXXIX, Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 praying to pass an order of temporary injunction, wherein 54 documents have been marked on the side of the petitioner and in order to give necessary permission to cross-examine the petitioner therein, the present petition has been filed in Interlocutory Application No.38 of 2011 and the Court below has dismissed the same. Against the dismissal order passed by the Court below, the present Civil Revision Petition has been preferred. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner has contended that Original Suit No.186 of 2010 has been filed for the relief of permanent injunction and Interlocutory Application No.513 of 2010 has been filed for getting an order of temporary injunction and further in Original Suit No.186 of 2010 on the side of the revision petitioner, a detailed written statement has been filed and Original Suit No.186 of 2010 is ready for trial and therefore the suit itself may be disposed of. 4. Considering the representation made on the side of the revision petitioner, this Court is of the view that necessary direction can be given to the Court below to dispose of Original Suit No.186 of 2010 as indicated below. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5. In fine, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of without costs on the basis of the observation made earlier. The District Munsif Court, Sivakasi is strictly directed to dispose of Original Suit No.186 of 2010 before the end of March, 2011 and report the same to the Registry without fail. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order forthwith. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/- Deputy Registrar /True copy/ Assistant Registrar To The District Munsif, Sivakasi. +1cc to Mr.N.Damodaran, Advocate SR.9231 Copy to : The Section Officer, Judicial Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. (For watching the Report) Smn SR : 02.03.2011 : 2p/4c C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.308 of 2011 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011 21.02.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/