1 1.arp.29.09 a.s..sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION skt ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 29 OF 2009 Idea Cellular Limited ... Petitioner Vs. M/s.L.K. Corporation ... Respondent ...... Mr.Amit Jamsandekar a/w. Mr.Umang Jajoo i/by M/s.D.H.Law Associates for the Petitioner. Mr.Vilas B. Tapkir for the Respondent. ...... CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : OCTOBER 1st, 2010. P.C. 1 This is a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. 2 The disputes and differences do not pertain to the licence fees/compensation or to the recovery of the possession. It pertains to refund of the security deposits. It it not denied that the agreement contains an arbitration clause. 4 The petition is disposed of by referring the disputes and differences between the parties to the sole arbitration of Mr.S.K.Shah, a retired Judge of the Court. -