HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED WRIT PETITION NO. 2681 OF 2000 Between: K. Venkatamma, D/o K. Narsunaidu aged abut 31 years ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh represented by its Secretary, Education Department and four others .....RESPONDENTS ORAL ORDER: This Writ Petition has been filed in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the notification dated 25.1.2000 in Indian Express published on 26.1.2000 issued by the 4th and 5th respondents as illegal and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to regularise her services. The petitioner was appointed as a Temporary Lecturer on Part-time adhoc basis in History Department of the 5th respondent-College in the year 1997. It is stated that the petitioner belongs to B.C. ‘D’ Community having Serial No. 30 and she was appointed on hourly basis viz., Rs. 20/- per hour against B.C. ‘D’ vacancy, which arose due to the death of one Smt. Y. Venkatamma, on 14.4.1997. It is further stated that though the existing vacancy belongs to B.C ‘D’ category at roster point No. 64 the 4th and 5th respondents issued notification dated 25.1.2000 inviting applications for filling up of vacancies in History Faculty with an intention to deprive the legitimate right of the petitioner to be regularised in the said post. Aggrieved by the same, she filed the present Writ Petition. Heard the learned counsel appearing for both sides and also perused the entire material made available on record. As seen from the record, the petitioner was appointed as Temporary Lecturer on part time adhoc basis in History department in the regular post of Smt. Y. Venkatamma, Lecturer in History, who expired on 14.4.1997. The posting of the petitioner is purely on hourly basis and per hour she is being paid Rs. 20/-. Therefore, the petitioner has no right to seek appointment on regular basis by questioning the notification-dated 25.1.2000 issued by 4th and 5th respondents. Hence, I see no reasons to interfere with the matter and the Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed. However, it is open for the petitioner to make representation to the authorities, seeking regularisation, and the same shall be considered and disposed of accordingly, subject to fulfilment of the conditions of the scheme if any. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J DATE: 25.11.2010 KA ... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. 2 CD copies.