IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11229 of 2011 HARENDRA SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 19.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Admittedly, neither petitioner is named in the First Information Report nor in the Sanha given by the informant. The impugned order of learned Sessions Judge reveals that the name of this petitioner came in further statement of informant as well as one witness, namely, Shankar Bhagat, and subsequently, some witnesses claimed to have seen the petitioner prior to the alleged occurrence in the company of co-accused Anu Bhagat and Manish Kumar. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that having similar allegation one co-accused, namely, Manish Kumar has already been granted privilege of bail by this Court. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Harendra Sah be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Motihari in connection with Mehsi P.S. Case No.104 of 2010. PN (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)