IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR. CHHATTISGARH M.C.C.NO. ^ /2006 APPLICANT *9 -^ l..% ^wy ./•/^ ^••^- ^ Kamili Padmavathi ^' Hindu aged 26 years W/o Kamili Venkateswara Rao Plot No. 103, BALAJI NAGAR, Vivekanand Nagar Colony Arilova. Vishakhanatnam (Andhra Pradesh) VERSUS ^ESPONDENT s Venkateswara Rao Hindu Aged 37 years S/o Danaiah, R/o - Plot No. 7, Block No. 14, Street No. 15/B, Sector 2 BHILAI NAGAR Tahsil and District DURG (CHHATTISGARH) PETITION UNDER SECTION 23f3) OF CFVIL PROCEDURE CODE FOR DIRECTIQN^OR TRANSFER OF CASE N0. 54^A/2005 PENDING BEFORE FAMILY COURT DURG. DISTRICT - DURG (C.G.) XI-HC-78 ^j^jni sh^l^) ';3n?n?ra', ^Tnyli<o, f^roy r^M^.:. f^ 4v. v .'^... £.-y... ... ^ ^oo^) w^v ^ra^ (^C|^C<(^T) ^ W^T^T^Jch cT^TT 3TR?T $FWcF ^ /y> ^ ?^TfW^cT3TT^T 10.11.2006 Applicant-Kamilt' Padmwathj Shrivastava, Advocate. Respondent-Kamjli Venkote^wara Rao inperson with Shri Anand Pandey, Advocate. The applicant-wife makes that the dispute between tiie b statement before ^iis Court settled and she has started livingl about a week. The respondent4( of petitfon under Section 9 o^ restitution of coryugal rights sinc^i In the above scenario, the 23(3) of C.P.C. does not surv accordingly dismissed. M.C.P.No.289 of 2006 for 2439 of 2006 also sfand disposec| <=bl«Fd41^^l^dT^-T^ <Rt^|< ^3rf^T3TT^T in person with Shrj Ajay wo spouses has amicobly been with her husband at Dur9 since usband also makes a statement that in view of the amicable settlelment arrived at between the two spouses and the fact that his wifle hasstarted ttving with him. he would, within a week from today, t+ove an cppljcation for wil+idrcwal the Hindu Marriage Act for jt has become infructuous. resent application under Section /e for decjsion-making and is |itay and I.A.Nos.1444 of 2006 & of. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge P.T.O.