IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Revision No.1 of 2008 (Ku. Soni d/o Rajendra @ Shrikant Manikarrao, Minor, through G.A.L. Mother-Sou. Pushpalata w/o Rajendra @ Shrikant Manikrao v. The State of Maharashtra) And Criminal Revision No.2 of 2008 (Sau. Pushpalata Rajendra @ Shrikant Manikrao v. The State of Maharashtra) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri A.S. Mardikar, Advocate for Applicants. APP for State. Coram : R.C. Chavan, J. Dated : 19th January, 2009. Heard. These applications by daughter and wife of non-applicant No.2 take exception to order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Washim, whereby the learned Judge set aside the order of the learned Magistrate directing issuance of a warrant for recovery of maintenance allowance due for 66 months, holding that recovery warrant can be issued for the dues of only one year. The learned Additional Sessions Judge had relied on a judgment of this Court in Gunwant Kawadoo Katore v. Kawadoo Katore, reported at 1989 Mh.L.J. 32. The applicants may be justified in contending that since they were dragged in various Courts in contesting the proceedings for grant of maintenance, maintenance for a period of 66 months got accumulated. This, however, does not justify issuance of warrant. The applicant ought to have applied for execution of the orders if there was no stay in the matter from time to time. Since that has not been done, no fault can be found with the order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge. The revision application are dismissed. Judge. Pdl.