1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR C.A. NO. 9124 OF 2007 IN SA ST. NO. 17019 OF 2007 Latari Balaji Zade vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. MARCH 18, 2008. Heard Shri Adkar, Advocate holding for Shri Khajanchi, Advocate for the applicant and Ms. Satpute, Advocate for respondent No. 3 and AGP for respondents No. 1 & 2. Nobody appears for respondent No.4, though he is served. The prayer is to condone delay of 13 days in filing Second Appeal. The request is being opposed by Ms. Satpute, Advocate for respondent No. 3. However, for the reasons given in the application, I am inclined to condone delay as there are no malafides in the matter. The applicant has stated that he was required to consult some advocate and for that purpose he was required to go to Nagpur and Chandrapur. In the circumstances, delay is condoned subject to payment of cost of Rs.500/- to High 2 Court, Legal Services Sub-Committee, Nagpur by 7th April 2008. If the costs are so paid, the office to register Second Appeal and list it for further consideration. JUDGE *GS.