IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.14813 of 1991 Date of decision: December 22, 2008. K.S. Bedi, Labour Inspector ...Petitioner(s) v. State of Haryana & Ors. ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri TPS Chawla, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Shri R.D. Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. ORDER Surya Kant, J. - The petitioner, in a way, seeks setting aside of the judgment dated 6.6.1991 (Annexure P-5) passed by this Court in CWP No.10336 of 1989. Vide the aforementioned judgment, the State of Haryana and its authorities were directed to grant the benefit of military service to respondent No.3 – Ram Chander Nain. As a result of implementation of the said judgment, respondent No.3 became senior to the petitioner as Labour Inspector. Since the petitioner was not a party to those proceedings, he has filed the present petition for setting aside the judgment qua the petitioner. Initially, operation of the order dated 16.9.1991 (Annexure P-7) whereby the benefit of military service was extended to respondent No.3 was stayed by this Court but later on the same was vacated by a self-speaking order dated 30.10.1991. Thereafter, the petitioner as well as respondent No.3 are stated to have retired from service on superannuation. The inter se seniority dispute at this stage is, thus, of academic nature only and need not be gone into in exercise of extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction of this Court. Disposed of. December 22, 2008. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge