ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO. 506 OF 2007 NO. 506 OF 2007 NO. 506 OF 2007 IN IN IN NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2142 OF 2005 OF MOTION NO. 2142 OF 2005 OF MOTION NO. 2142 OF 2005 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 2531 OF 2004 NO. 2531 OF 2004 NO. 2531 OF 2004 M/s.Pali Investments ...Appellants. Vs. Mrs.Sushilarani B.Patel & Ors. ...Respondents. Ms.Rupa Poojari i/by Legal Associates for the Appellants. CORAM CORAM CORAM : : : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 21ST FEBRUARY, 2008 : 21ST FEBRUARY, 2008 : 21ST FEBRUARY, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . The above Appeal was lodged on 11th May, 2007 challenging the Interlocutory order dated 16th April, 2007 and the Appeal was finally numbered on 25th July, 2007. The Appellants did not bother to get the matter circulated at all. Pursuant to our directions, the matter appeared on board on 16th January, 2008 on which date the learned counsel for the Appellants sought two weeks adjournment to serve the Respondents. Accordingly, the matter was adjourned to 30th January, 2008. Again on 30th January, 2008, the learned counsel for the Appellants again sought two weeks adjournment to serve the Respondents. At that time ( 2 ) also we adjourned it by two weeks. The learned Advocates for the Appellants did not bother to serve the Respondents till this date. Under the circumstances, in view of not taking further steps to serve the Respondents consistently, we are constrained to dismiss the above Appeal and the same is dismissed accordingly. (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)