:1: :1: :1: HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 717 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 582 OF 2007. Laltu Ashok Ghosh. ..Applicant. Versus. The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. --- Santosh Deshpande for the applicant. A. R. Patil APP for the State. CORAM: S. B. MHASE & CORAM: S. B. MHASE & CORAM: S. B. MHASE & SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 2008. DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 2008. DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. This is application for bail. Applicant has been convicted for offences punishable under sections 302, 394 and 449 read with 34 of the IPC. He is the life convict. The applicant has prayed for bail during the pendency of the appeal. 2. During the trial the applicant was not on bail. The case is based on circumstantial evidence. We have gone through the judgment and the evidence on record. We find that there are certain clinching circumstances. We also find that there is recovery panchnama under section 27. Ornaments have been recovered at the instance of the applicant. It is further noted that finger prints of the applicant were found on the cup-board which tally :2: :2: :2: with the applicant no.1. There is evidence of last seen together. The extra judicial confession of the applicant and the injuries on his person are further more circumstances which clinch this accused with the offence. Going through the material on record and after considering the submissions of the learned counsel we are satisfied that there is no case made out for the grant of bail. Application for grant of bail is without any merit. Therefore, it is rejected. (SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) /2008/VKT/..