é BEFORE THE STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL BENCH AT RAIPUR CHHATTISGARH. 2-..A cNO u 200 1 [Aliy/§)f_yxt7 gF/O} r Sita Ram ShriVas, son of Shri Sakha Ram Asstt. Teacher, Primary School Bagoud, Block Dabhara. District Janjgir C.G. . . . Applicant VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh. Through Secretary , School Education Department . Mantral aya , D .K.S .Bhawan . Raipur . Chh attisgarh . 2 . Director , Publ ic Instructions Chhattisgarh Pension Bada, Raipur' (C.G.). 3. District Education Officer, District Janjgir duampa. f! Chh attisgarh .v . o . Non applicants ? TRIBUNAL ACT l 985 . @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI$GARH AT BILASPUR WP. (S) No. $796 of‘2005 Petitioner Sim Ram Shrivas . Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & others SB: Hon'bte Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihoui, J, V. V. S. Murthy, Deputy Advocate General with Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govt. - Adxzncate for the respondentsfswe. O R D E R (PaSsed on this 9‘" day of March, 2007) The faiiowing order of the Court is passed by Satish K. Agnihotri, J. 1. The petitioner whiie working as Assistant Teacher in Primary Schooi. Baoud. Block - Dabhara, District ~ Janigir Champa was transferred to Middie School. Rekara Bhant. Dabhara. on the same terms and conditions vide impugned order dated 10.9.2001 (Annexure N1). 2. The Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal at Raipur vide interim order dated 22.9.2001 directed to maintain status quo in regard to the position of die petitioner as it was prevailing on 17.9.2001. By virtae of the interim order the petitioner is working at the original piace of posting. 3. Be that as it may, with the passage of time this petition has become iniructuous as period of hangeris not applicable forevet. At this point of time there is no question to examine the validity of the transfer order. However, the responderm are at liberty to pass appropriate orders keeping in view the public interest and administrative exigency, without insisting on compliance of the impugned transfer order. 4. lt is well settled principle of law that transfer is an incident of service and it is for the employer to decide as to where a particular ofticer/empioyee be posted. keeping in view public interest as well as administrative exigency. This Court has limited iun'sdiction to interfere in the transfer matter and this Court can interfere only in the case of proved maiatide. non-competence of authority passing the transfer order and transfer order not being in conformity with the rules and regulations. 5. in view of the above, this petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Shri Anupam Dubey. Advocate for the petitioner. Thakur l. ~ Sd/- ii Satish K. Agnihotri .i ‘ Judge .i it