f , . IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA’I'FISGARH : BILASPUR‘ , Wxit Petitio'n'(S) No. 2201 of2005 Petitioner Smt Tan71m Bsgnm, aged about 33 years ‘ - Wife of Shn Khahduddm, Ass1smnt Tralmng OfiEcer, MahJla Industnal Trajmng Inshtutt KOrba, ‘ res1deut of Industnal Tramlng Inshtute, Colony, Qr No I’Iype 2 Koxba - _ D1stnct Bllaspur ’ . Versus '>Respondents 1‘. The Stats of Madhya Pradesh (now . Chhattlsgarh) through its Secmtary Tubal Welfare Depariment Government of . . 'Madhya Pradesh Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal 32.; The Commlssmner, AdlvaSI Vlkas, Madhya‘ \ Pradesh Bhopal Satpura Bhawan, Bhopal APLPLICATION UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE ‘ ‘ ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS ACT 1985 V (SB Hon’ble Shn Sansh K Agmhotn J ) Shn Amnto Das, Advocate for the petmoner §hn P K Bhadun Panel Lawyer for the respondents e O R D E R ‘ ‘ (Passed on this 1 1th Day ofAugust 2008) A V .1 1.: 1 Thgs petltlon was Illed m the Madhya Pradesh State- » Admlmstrauve Tnbunal Bhopal Bench Bhopal After , d1ssolutlon of the Tnbunal 1t was recelved on transfer to thls , , x Court 1 _ g 1 ' 'Learned counsel appeanng for the petttloner at thls stage ‘ does not want to press thus petmon on ment However the pehuoner be penmtted to make a representatlon before the 'concerned authonges for appropnate rehef to Whlch learned I counsel appealing for the State/respondents has no objec’uon 3. The petrtton 1s d1sm1ssed w1th the above stated hberty In the event a representanon 1s made by the petttloner, the same may be cons1dered 1n accordance w1th law, on 1ts own memts, ~ asgexpeditiously as possible,,»* 4'. Interim order granted‘earlier/stands discharged. ‘ n31 Sdl- ‘ ‘ l “ShK Agnihom Judge i f l "-" - .