B » IN ^l?^ '^f-k^- ^- -" .• cr^ ~^^~rl^ y INTHEHON'BLEHIGHCOITRTOFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. fS) No. \4S^- OF2010 PETITIONER <y \ "-.*''^' .&^r;2^-"" -'••'^f^'H[-^""" ^..,^-3"'\9>'"' RESPONDENTS /:!) / :2) :3) / Fuljens Minj, son of SUri G.Minj, aged about 55 years working as Town Inspector, R/o^ House N0.9A, Streef 71, Sector-6, Bhilai District Durg (C.G.) Versus State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Ministry of Hom.e Department DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) Director General of Police, Chhattisgarh Raipur (C.G.) Superintendent of Police, District Korea (Chhattisgarh) WMT PETITION UNDE^ ARTJCI^ 226 OF' TftE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSU^ |EN ORDER/DIREGTION IN THE NATURE OFt CERTI@RA]E^ ETC. • . : ; 1 .- ; : .•..:1/: ^.' " ^:. M^ IS K! ^••' ashok HIGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARHATBILASPUR WRITPETITION (S) NCL1T57 0^2010 Petitioner Versus ResDondents Fuljens Minj State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon'bleMr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.)- Present:- Shri Uttam Pandey, Advocate forthe petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyerfor the State/respondents. ORDER(ORAL) (Passedon 21st day ofJanuary, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that by virtue of interim relief granted on 19.4.2010, the petitioner has continued on'the same place of posting from where he was transferred to new place videorder dated 26.7.2008. Thus, the petitioner does not wantto press this petition on merit. However, since the impugned transfer order was not given effectto.the Stafeauthorities may be directed not to insist on compliance of the earlier transfer order, as the Government may pass another order on administrative exigency and in public jnterest. 2. Shri Bhaduri, appearing for the State sybmits that in view of the above submjssions, the impugned prder shall not be insisted upon for compliance, however, the State may be granted liberty to pass fresh order, ifany. 3. It is orderedaGCordingly. Consequenfly,the writ petitionis disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri judge