In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 1917 of 2008 (O&M) Brij Lal ..... Petitioner vs Tajanjeet Singh and others .... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Ashok Khubbar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. B. S. Bhalla, Advocate, for respondents no. 1 and 2. Mr. Manish Soni, Advocate, for respondents no. 3 and 4. Rajesh Bindal J. Challenge in the present petition is to the order passed by the learned court below in proceedings under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 CPC in a suit filed by respondents no. 1 and 2 against respondents no. 3 and 4. The petitioner moved an application in that suit under Order I Rule 10 CPC seeking his impleadment therein. The application was dismissed by the learned court below. Vide separate order passed in Civil Revision No. 1918 of 2008 Brij Lal vs Tajanjeet Singh and others on 28.5.2009, the order so passed by the trial court in the application filed by the petitioner for being impleaded as one of the defendants in the suit was upheld. Once the petitioner is not party to the litigation between respondents no. 1 and 2 with respondents no. 3 and 4, in my opinion, no cause of action arises to the petitioner to challenge the order passed by the learned court below in proceedings under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 CPC. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. 02.07.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge