IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12135 of 2010 1. DILIP PRASAD S/O LATE BISHWANATH PRASAD R/O VILL DUMRI, P.S.JOGAPATTI, DISTT-WEST CHAMPARAN Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE WEST CHAMPARAN AT BETTIAH 3. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER BETTIAH 4. DY. COLLECTOR, LAND REFORMS BETTIAH 5. ANCHAL ADHIKARI JOGAPATTI, DISTT-WEST CHAMAPARAN 6. SHRI BIKHARI YADAV S/O .......................................... AT PRESENT MUKHIYA , GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ DUMRI, P.S.JOGAPATTI, DISTT-WEST CHAMPARAN ----------- 02. 28.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and for the State. The petitioner alleges encroachment of a public road by respondent no.6 affecting his ingress and egress to his house. Counter affidavit has been filed by respondent nos. 2 to 5. Learned counsel for the State from his averments made in the counter affidavit finds it difficult to explain why the counter affidavit falls short of appropriate action and decision by the official respondents in view of their own statement made therein. The writ petition is disposed off in terms of the counter affidavit itself with directions to the Circle Officer to ensure that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken in light of the statements made therein preferably within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order before him. P.K ( Navin Sinha, J.)