IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE 26TH APRIL 2011 / 6TH VAISAKHA 1933 WP(C).No. 12510 of 2011(L) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SHANIL.S., AGED 35 YEARS, S/O. SADANANDAN, THODIYIL VEEDU, VALATHUNGAL.P.O., KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES(GENERAL),KOLLAM-691 001. 2. THE PARAVUR S.N.V. REGIONAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.1685, PARAVOOR, KOLLAM-691 301. R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. M.R. SREELATHA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/04/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J. -------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.12510 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of April, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner had availed a loan of Rs.7 lakhs from the second respondent Bank on 9.5.2005. According to the petitioner, due to financial difficulties consequent to the collapse of his business, he was not able to repay the loan. At present, proceedings have been initiated against him for recovery of the loan amount. The petitioner contends that various payments made by him have not been credited to his account. He also disputes his liability to pay the penal interest that has been charged by the Bank. The rate of interest is also disputed by him. Petitioner further alleges that there are errors in the calculation of the amount that has been demanded. Though he had approached the Bank on a number of occasions for correcting the mistakes and for enabling him to know the actual amount that is due and payable by him, he complains that the Bank has not notified the amount due from him so far. In the above circumstances, he submitted Ext.P3 representation to the W.P.(C).No.12510 of 2011 2 first respondent. However, no orders have been passed on Ext.P3 also. The limited prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner is for a direction to the first respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P3 expeditiously. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider Ext.P3 representation submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. This writ petition is disposed of as above. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE. mns