IN THE HIGHJ:QURT OF CHHATTCS6ARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETCTEON (5 ) No. ^ 2^- Of 2011 PETETEONER: RESPONDENTS; ^: •y-" ^ ^" . '^^,-.^^ ^s^^y ^--^•.^sff!f' ^ br. B.P. Pandey S/o Late Shri Dharneedhar Pandey, aged about 63 years, Retired Block Medical Officer, R/o Rajapara, Sakti, District Janjgir Champa (C6). Versus /1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, bepartment of Health and Family Welfare, Secretariat, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). ^2. The Director, birectorate of Health Services, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C6). ^3. The Chief Medical and Health Officer (C.M.&H.O.), Janjgir. bistrict Janjgir Champa (C6). ^4. The Chief Medical and Health Officer, Korba, District Korba (C6). ^5. The Joint Director, Accounts, Funds and Pension, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (CG). WRIT PETCTION UNbER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTEON OF INDIA 1. PARTECULARS OF THE PETITEONER: As stated in the cause title above. ^^> ^^A>v" ;,.s1"" '?••" ^ 2. PARTECULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS: As stated in the cause title above. 'b'1- I-HC-22 311^1'EBI R-fi.'* sn^i ?htfi<*i ^{ed Deepli ~F3l 't^WM^, a'fll'y'is. fadi'yy STT^T TR-g? 1\A-0 *41*«tl ShHrai 00 fq^ST' sn^i'Rdiw^fei SB: Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohah Shrivastava, J^ 10-01-2011 Shri Sameer Behar, counsel Shri Sushil Dubey, Governmi advance copy. Heard. The grievance of the petition on Wi07i09, 25% of pension as w< been reteased and wtthheid. Learned counsei for th< communication dated 29/09/2010 (^ and 19/11/2010 (Annexure P/5), it granted scate promotion on 19/0f records, the matter has remained p| their inabiiity to trace records, re( amount. Considering that the petN:) promotion on ^9141QQ as mentionei] and that he has retired on 31/74 necessary communication and early as possibte. in case, necessary records ^ from today, balance amount payab|< With the aforesaid observatit cnf^T<n4li *iM<vif'4 fel^l <[a|^.l< ^SI^tW 311^1 for the petitioner. 4nt Advocate ror the State/respondents on ^r is that though the petitioner has retired ii as 25% of the gratuity amount have not Detitioner submits that from the ^nnexure P/3), 27/10/2010 (Annexure P/4) |s reveaied ihat though the petitioner was )/99, for want of avaiiability of retevant mding and various ofRcere are expressing iuiting deiay in payment of the balance oner had already been granted scate in order dated 28/9/2010 (Annexure P/3) 39, respondents No.3 and 4 shail send as required to responctent No.5, as details re not made avaiiabte within three months to the petitioner shalt be released. >ns, the petition is finaily disposed off. SA'- MaiaiiMlraMohari Shrreastav. Judge