..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2695 OF 2006 Narayan C. Bagade and Anr. ...Petitioners. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents. .... Mr.A.Punwani, Adv. for Petitioners. Mr.A.S.Shinde, APP, for State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 22nd February, 2007. DATED : 22nd February, 2007. DATED : 22nd February, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard learned Advocate for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner is facing prosecution in a case under Section 138 of N.I.Act. The said case is numbered as Criminal Complaint No.2270/S/99 which is pending in the Court of learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 44th Court, Andheri, Mumbai. In the said case, process has been issued against the petitioner under Section 138 of ..(2).. N.I.Act. 3. Today, the petitioners-orig.accused as well as respondent-orig.complainant are present before the Court. They have stated that they have amicably settled the matter. Respondent No.2-orig.complainant states that he does not wish to pursue his complaint i.e. C.C. No.2270/S/99. 4. The parties have arrived at consent terms which are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. 5. In view of the consent terms, C.C.No.2270/S/99 is quashed. The learned Magistrate shall return the dishonoured cheques and bill of exchange. 6. Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)