IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.965 OF 2008 WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2008 Hindustan Computers. ..Applicant. Vs. M/s. Dart Computers Ltd. and ors. ..Respondents. Mr. Shirish Gupte, Sr.Advocate with Uday Malte for the Applicant. Mr.Anil Kumar i/by M. Navalani for the Respondents 1 to 3. Mrs. R.M.Gadhavi, APP. for the State. CORAM: R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 5th September,2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This is an application for leave to file appeal. Perused the application. Arguable points are made out. The question as to whether in summary trial the court can dispose of the application on an interim application, requires reconsideration, particularly when there is no express provision in Chapter 20 of the Cr.P.C. Apart from this, can an unexhibited document can be held to be fraudulent also requires reconsideration. Hence, leave granted. Consequently, the office to number the appeal. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2008 1. By a separate order passed today, I have granted leave. Hence, appeal admitted. The Advocate for the respondents 1 to 3 waives notice in the appeal. 2. R & P. be called for urgently. 3. Hearing expedited. (R. S. MOHITE, J.) IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.966 OF 2008 WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2008 Hindustan Computers. ..Applicant. Vs. M/s. Dart Computers Ltd. and ors. ..Respondents. Mr. Shirish Gupte, Sr.Advocate with Uday Malte for the Applicant. Mr.Anil Kumar i/by M. Navalani for the Respondents 1 to 3. Mrs. R.M.Gadhavi, APP. for the State. CORAM: R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 5th September,2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This is an application for leave to file appeal. Perused the application. Arguable points are made out. The question as to whether in summary trial the court can dispose of the application on an interim application, requires reconsideration, particularly when there is no express provision in Chapter 20 of the Cr.P.C. Apart from this, can an unexhibited document can be held to be fraudulent also requires reconsideration. Hence, leave granted. Consequently, the office to number the appeal. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2008 1. By a separate order passed today, I have granted leave. Hence, appeal admitted. The Advocate for the respondents 1 to 3 waives notice in the appeal. 2. R & P. be called for urgently. 3. Hearing expedited. (R. S. MOHITE, J.) IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.967 OF 2008 WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2008 Hindustan Computers. ..Applicant. Vs. M/s. Dart Computers Ltd. and ors. ..Respondents. Mr. Shirish Gupte, Sr.Advocate with Uday Malte for the Applicant. Mr.Anil Kumar i/by M. Navalani for the Respondents 1 to 3. Mrs. R.M.Gadhavi, APP. for the State. CORAM: R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 5th September,2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This is an application for leave to file appeal. Perused the application. Arguable points are made out. The question as to whether in summary trial the court can dispose of the application on an interim application, requires reconsideration, particularly when there is no express provision in Chapter 20 of the Cr.P.C. Apart from this, can an unexhibited document can be held to be fraudulent also requires reconsideration. Hence, leave granted. Consequently, the office to number the appeal. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2008 1. By a separate order passed today, I have granted leave. Hence, appeal admitted. The Advocate for the respondents 1 to 3 waives notice in the appeal. 2. R & P. be called for urgently. 3. Hearing expedited. (R. S. MOHITE, J.) IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.968 OF 2008 WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2008 Hindustan Computers. ..Applicant. Vs. M/s. Dart Computers Ltd. and ors. ..Respondents. Mr. Shirish Gupte, Sr.Advocate with Uday Malte for the Applicant. Mr.Anil Kumar i/by M. Navalani for the Respondents 1 to 3. Mrs. R.M.Gadhavi, APP. for the State. CORAM: R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 5th September,2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This is an application for leave to file appeal. Perused the application. Arguable points are made out. The question as to whether in summary trial the court can dispose of the application on an interim application, requires reconsideration, particularly when there is no express provision in Chapter 20 of the Cr.P.C. Apart from this, can an unexhibited document can be held to be fraudulent also requires reconsideration. Hence, leave granted. Consequently, the office to number the appeal. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2008 1. By a separate order passed today, I have granted leave. Hence, appeal admitted. The Advocate for the respondents 1 to 3 waives notice in the appeal. 2. R & P. be called for urgently. 3. Hearing expedited. (R. S. MOHITE, J.) IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.969 OF 2008 WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2008 Hindustan Computers. ..Applicant. Vs. M/s. Dart Computers Ltd. and ors. ..Respondents. Mr. Shirish Gupte, Sr.Advocate with Uday Malte for the Applicant. Mr.Anil Kumar i/by M. Navalani for the Respondents 1 to 3. Mrs. R.M.Gadhavi, APP. for the State. CORAM: R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 5th September,2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This is an application for leave to file appeal. Perused the application. Arguable points are made out. The question as to whether in summary trial the court can dispose of the application on an interim application, requires reconsideration, particularly when there is no express provision in Chapter 20 of the Cr.P.C. Apart from this, can an unexhibited document can be held to be fraudulent also requires reconsideration. Hence, leave granted. Consequently, the office to number the appeal. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2008 1. By a separate order passed today, I have granted leave. Hence, appeal admitted. The Advocate for the respondents 1 to 3 waives notice in the appeal. 2. R & P. be called for urgently. 3. Hearing expedited. (R. S. MOHITE, J.) IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.970 OF 2008 WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2008 Hindustan Computers. ..Applicant. Vs. M/s. Dart Computers Ltd. and ors. ..Respondents. Mr. Shirish Gupte, Sr.Advocate with Uday Malte for the Applicant. Mr.Anil Kumar i/by M. Navalani for the Respondents 1 to 3. Mrs. R.M.Gadhavi, APP. for the State. CORAM: R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 5th September,2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This is an application for leave to file appeal. Perused the application. Arguable points are made out. The question as to whether in summary trial the court can dispose of the application on an interim application, requires reconsideration, particularly when there is no express provision in Chapter 20 of the Cr.P.C. Apart from this, can an unexhibited document can be held to be fraudulent also requires reconsideration. Hence, leave granted. Consequently, the office to number the appeal. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2008 1. By a separate order passed today, I have granted leave. Hence, appeal admitted. The Advocate for the respondents 1 to 3 waives notice in the appeal. 2. R & P. be called for urgently. 3. Hearing expedited. (R. S. MOHITE, J.) IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.971 OF 2008 WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2008 Hindustan Computers. ..Applicant. Vs. M/s. Dart Computers Ltd. and ors. ..Respondents. Mr. Shirish Gupte, Sr.Advocate with Uday Malte for the Applicant. Mr.Anil Kumar i/by M. Navalani for the Respondents 1 to 3. Mrs. R.M.Gadhavi, APP. for the State. CORAM: R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 5th September,2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This is an application for leave to file appeal. Perused the application. Arguable points are made out. The question as to whether in summary trial the court can dispose of the application on an interim application, requires reconsideration, particularly when there is no express provision in Chapter 20 of the Cr.P.C. Apart from this, can an unexhibited document can be held to be fraudulent also requires reconsideration. Hence, leave granted. Consequently, the office to number the appeal. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2008 1. By a separate order passed today, I have granted leave. Hence, appeal admitted. The Advocate for the respondents 1 to 3 waives notice in the appeal. 2. R & P. be called for urgently. 3. Hearing expedited. (R. S. MOHITE, J.)