1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1811 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.1811 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.1811 OF 2007 IN IN IN CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1012 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.1012 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.1012 OF 2007 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.3616 OF 2004 PETITION NO.3616 OF 2004 PETITION NO.3616 OF 2004 Suparibaug Madhyavarti Sahakari Grahak Sangh Ltd : Applicants. versus Madhu Mahendra Chadha & ors. : Respondents. Miss.P.P.Tendulkar i/by Raymond & Co. for the applicants. CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.A.BOBDE, J. : S.A.BOBDE, J. : S.A.BOBDE, J. DATED DATED DATED : OCTOBER 05, 2007. : OCTOBER 05, 2007. : OCTOBER 05, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. The applicants seek substituted service on the basis that the bailiff has not 2 found the respondents at their addresses and the time at which the respondents are present in the premises is not known. It appears from the averments made in Civil Application No.1810 of 2007 that the bailiff has affixed the copy of the notice along with the copy of the writ petition on the outer door of the residence of Respondent No.2. Today none appears for the respondents. Hence civil application for substituted service is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) (i) (ii) and (iii). Civil Application is disposed of. [S.A.BOBDE,J] [S.A.BOBDE,J] [S.A.BOBDE,J]