IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 25158 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: September 23, 2010. Nasib Kaur ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Punjab ...... RESPONDENT(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Iqbal Singh Mann, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.D.Sachdeva, Addl.A.G., Punjab. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No.159 dated 21.10.2009 under Sections 306/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar, Muktsar, District Muktsar. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. This Court while issuing notice of motion on 30.08.2010 passed the following order:- “Crl.M.No.44862 of 2010 CRM No.M-25158 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-25158 of 2010 Contends that petitioner is an old lady of 71 years of age and that she was found innocent by the police after investigation and however, she has been summoned by learned Sessions Judge, Muktsar, on an application filed on behalf of the prosecution under Section 319 Cr.P.C. Notice of motion for 23.9.2010. However, petitioner is directed to appear before learned trial Court within two weeks from today and in case she so appears and applies for regular bail, she be admitted to interim bail by learned trial Court to its satisfaction subject to any conditions that may be deemed to be imposed by learned trial Court.” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has already appeared before learned trial Court pursuant to said order dated 30.08.2010 and admitted to interim bail by learned trial Court on 06.09.2010. Copy of the said order has also been placed on record. It is further contended that petitioner undertakes to appear before learned trial Court on each and every date of hearing. Learned counsel for the State has not disputed these facts. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that she is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, in view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of Nasib Kaur is accepted and order dated 30.08.2010 granting interim bail in favour of the petitioner is, hereby, made absolute subject to any conditions that may be imposed by learned trial Court. 2 CRM No.M-25158 of 2010 The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) September 23, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 3