IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS MONDAY, THE 17TH MAY 2010 / 27TH VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 5178 of 2010(V) ------------------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- AMMINI EAPEN, AGED 88 YEARS, W/O.LATE EAPEN, PARUVANICKAL VEETTIL, THOTTABHAGOM P.O., KAVYOOR, THIRUVALLA. BY ADV. SRI.R.SANTHOSH BABU RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATHANAMTHITTA. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUVALLA POLICE STATION, THIRUVALLA 3. P.E.ABRAHAM, PARUVANICKAL HOUSE, THOTTABHAGOM PO., KAVIYOOR, THIRUVALLA. 4. KUNJUNJAMMA, W/O.ABRAHAM, OF DO. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI T.K. VIPINDAS. ADV. SRI.P.HARIDAS FOR R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.(C).NO.5178 OF 2010 V PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT DATED 28.1.10. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT DATED 1.2.10. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF POSTAL RECEIPT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE R4(A): TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 13.01.2010 ISSUED BY THE FOURTH RESPONDENT. // True Copy // PS to Judge K. M. JOSEPH & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. -------------------------------------------------- W.P(C). NO. 5178 OF 2010 V --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th May, 2010 JUDGMENT K.M. Joseph, J. The Writ Petition is filed seeking police protection to the life of the petitioner. Briefly put, the case of the petitioner is as follows: Petitioner is an 88 year old, ailing and bed-ridden lady. Respondents 3 and 4 are her son and daughter-in-law. The home nurse who was looking after her was sent off from the house without any reason or her knowledge by respondents 3 and 4. Petitioner filed complaints. 2. We have passed interim order. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the fourth respondent, namely the daughter-in-law of the petitioner and the wife of the third respondent, would contend that the game plan is to oust the fourth respondent, as the the third respondent has a concubine. WPC.NO.5178/10 V 2 3. We dispose of the Writ Petition as follows: We make the interim order absolute. We make it clear that the police will not oust the fourth respondent from her matrimonial house under the cover of the order. Sd/= K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE Sd/= M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JUDGE kbk. // True Copy // PS to Judge