1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.760 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2062 OF 2010 Sadiq Ali Suleman .. Appellant. Vs. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay .. Respondents. Mr.P.B.Shah for the appellant/applicant. Mr.J.J.Xavier with Mr.Vinod Mahadik i/b R.A.Malandkar for the respondent-corporation. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 20/10/2010. PC: 1. Learned counsel for the appellant prays for withdrawal of the appeal with liberty to the appellant to file writ petition challenging the order impugned in the present appeal and/or challenging the notice under section 89 of the M.R.T.P. Act and/or the order under section 90 of the said Act. He also prays for stay of the notice and the order for a period of eight weeks from today to enable the appellant to file writ petition and obtain appropriate order therein. Learned counsel for the respondent in all fairness states that they will not take action for a period of eight weeks from today. His statement is accepted. S 2 He, however, submits that all contentions of the respondent- corporation be kept open to be raised in the petition, that the appellant intends to file. In view of the submissions of learned counsel for the parties the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. All contentions of the parties are kept open. 2. The corporation shall not take any coercive action in pursuance of the notice and the order passed under section 89 and 90 of the M.R.T.P. Act respectively for a period of eight weeks from today. Consequently, the civil application is also disposed of. (D.B.Bhosale, J.)