c IN THE HI6H COURT OF JUbICATURE AT BILASPUR. WRIT PETITION (c) N0. '^>o2-t-\ of 2010 PETITIONER Vs RESPONDENTS o -..••" 1.^ ?,v°l '..'..-•'" (A»^ s^-'' &r. Rajeev Jaiswal, son of Shri R.N. Jaiswal, aged 31 years, Occupation-Student, resident of Manjhapara, Kanker (C6) 1. Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry of Medical Education, New Delhi. • 2; State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Medical Education, Mantralay, D.KS. Bhawan, Raipur. 3. The Director, Medical Education, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Raipur. 4. The Medical Council of India, Aiwan- E 6alib Marg, Kotla Road, New Delhi. WRIT PETITION UNOER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER (S):- As per the cause title. 2. PAFSTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENT (S);- As per the cause title. K lllili'llir ^t!:'l: ^^S^/lW'W. '•.V^S'?: .'•"/'••• .'i!i>:... 'liSgi' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0. 3024 OF 2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Dr. Rajeev Jaiswal Versus Union of India and others iihsfc DB:- HON'BLE SHRI I.M. QUDDUSI & HON'BLE SHRI N.K. AGARWAL. JJ PRESENT:- Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Fouzia Mirza, Asstt. Solicitor General, for the Union of India. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Adv. General for the State. ORAL ORDER (28-6-2Q10) 1. By way of this petition, the petitionei- had inter alia prayed for direction to the respondents to hold counseling for vacant seats admitting the students in Post Graduate Degree Diploma courses for the academic session 2010-11, but today learned counsel for the petitioner has apprised this Court that fhe counseling was fb:ed for today and, therefore, this writ petition has become infructuous. 2. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- I.M. Quddusi Judge Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge