1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5349 OF 2004 Mahesh Ramling Walujkar ..Petitioner. Vs. The Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents. ... Mr. Dilip Bodke for the Petitioner. Ms. Neeta Masurkar instructed by Mr. V.S. Masurkar for Respondent Nos.1 and 3. ... CORAM:KSHITIJ R. VYAS, C.J. & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. 28th March, 2006. P.C. : The learned counsel appearing for Respondent Nos.1 and 3 has produced a Notification dated 17th December, 1998 issued by the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions (Department of Personnel and Training), Government of India, New Delhi. Entry No.35 of the said Notification includes Navodya Vidyalaya Samiti, New Delhi – Respondent No.3 herein. The said Notification was issued under Section 14 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985. The said Notification empowers the Central Administrative Tribunal to 2 decide the disputes against Respondent No.3. The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner does not dispute this fact. In view of this we relegate the Petitioner to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal. In the event of the Petitioner filing an application before the Central Administrative Tribunal, the Tribunal shall bear in mind the pendency of the Petition while considering the question of limitation. With this direction/ observation, the Petition stands disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J.