1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO. 584/2002 (Satya Narain Sharma and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.) Date of Order : 27/07/2007 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. P.N.Moahani for the petitioner. Mr. Narpat Singh for the respondent No.2. Mr. V.R.Mehta, P.P. BY THE COURT:- By the instant criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner has challenged the order dated 20.10.2001 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pali (for short 'the revisional court' hereinafter) whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioner against the order dated 28.2.2001 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Environment), Pali (for short 'the trial court' hereinafter) was dismissed. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent NO.2 submits that the order framing charge is of the year 2001 and thereafter the trial court has recorded the statements of prosecution witnesses. He has shown me a copy of the statements of some of the witnesses recorded way back on 2 7.12.2005 and 11.5.2006. In this view of the matter, since the trial court has already recorded the statements of the witnesses and that evidence is not subject to review in this petition, in my view, the petition has become infructuous. The criminal misc. petition is therefore, dismissed as having become infructuous. However, it is open for the petitioner to raise all the contentions which have been raised in the instant petition before the trial court at the time of deciding the matter finally. (H.R.PANWAR),J. rp