1 caf2458-11 rpa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURSIDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2458 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1456 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. ..... Ms. Nikita Trivedi for the applicant. Mr. C. B. Yadav i/b. Mr. M. R. Yadav for respondent Nos.2 and 3. Mr. Anil Singh i/b. Mr. D. R. Shah for respondent Nos. 5 to 7. ..... CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : OCTOBER 18, 2011. P.C.: Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant, the learned counsel appearing for the second and third respondents and the learned counsel appearing for the fifth to seventh respondents. The fourth respondent is represented by an advocate. The first and the fourth respondents are the same. During the pendency of the suit, there was an interim injunction granted restraining the respondent Nos.1 to 3 from creating any third party rights in respect of the suit property. The fifth to seventh 2 caf2458-11 respondents have purchased a part of the suit property during the pendency of the suit from first to third respondents. The learned counsel appearing for the fifth to seventh respondents states that the said respondents will not create any third party rights in respect of the suit property without seeking leave of this Court. The statement is accepted. 2. Hence, the application is disposed of by passing following order: :: O R D E R :: i. Ad-interim relief granted earlier will continue to operate against the first to fourth respondents till the disposal of the Appeal. ii. The statement made by the learned counsel appearing for the fifth to seventh respondents on instructions of the said respondents recorded above is accepted. Hence, it is not necessary to grant any relief against the said respondents. iii. Application is accordingly disposed of. (A.S.OKA, J.)