XI-HG—78 =F ^ET ^i^ioiq, ^ti1<-i^(D, "[®i<ni<H^< Mn^lT ^»l<ra» "^ 200 ^TT^T^Tf^TNT ^T^T 31T^T 5b^i<^ 'v- ^IN»^ 37T^T °q^T ( ^clf^<^T) '^TTW^RfiH ^TT^T SINGLE BENCM. MON'BllE *JUSTICE DMIRE?^DRA MISMRA- CONTEJV1FT ffETITION N0.228/2007 PETITIONER Vs Ageshwar Panchayat resident ofl (CG). oni^fd^i ^TR^ff ^ 'fe^t ^^K ^7 3TRm3T7^T Das, son of Aachan Das Manikpuri, Karmi, Gram Panchayat Kolihamar, Kolihamar, Tahsil Gurur, District Durg RESPONDENT 21.04.2008 Mr. Anii Pandey, Adv. for the jj)etitioner Shri M.L [Pandey, Deputy Director, Panchayat Evam Soci^l Justice, Tahsi! & District Durg, Mr. S. Dubey, Advocate for th| Heard. The petitioner has fiied th| ^ respondent. is contempt petition for Initiating contempt proceeding against the respondent c|n the aliegation that he has not complled with the order dated 21.7.2006 passed] termination passed by the Sarpanch| in W.P. No.3602,ff)6 whereby the order of Gram Panchayat Kolihamar of the petitioner has been quashed. Respondent in his counter afpdavit has submitted that the order passed by this Court has been duly complied wi|h and the petitioner has been reinstated on the post of Panchayat Kamni vlde ordef| also been tendered for the delay in cc| Taking into consideration th$t the order passed by this Court has been complied with and further COHSH unconditional apology in his repiy fot opinion that no further action is neces Accordingly, the apology ten< contempt proceedings jnjtiated again^t him is hereby dropped. dated 4.12.2007. Unconditional apojogy has mpiiance of the order. ^ering that the respondent has tendered delay In oompiiance of the order, i am of the |sary in this petition. plered by the respondent is accepted and the ^LT""" Judge