1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 26/2007 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Mr. D.Y. Nandedkar, Advocate for appellants. Mrs. C.S. Deshmukh, Advocate for respondents no. 1A to 1C. Date : 19th July, 2010 PER COURT : 1 Heard. 2 Both the Courts below held against the appellant/plaintiff that the house properties were also partitioned in 1964 alongwith agricultural lands. The learned judge of the first appeal Court giving cogent reasons, recorded a finding which is mainly on facts that the partition of house properties also took place. In view of this, there is no scope for interference in the finding of facts. There appears no substantial question of law arising in this appeal. The appeal stands dismissed. [A.V. NIRGUDE, J.] tsk/