IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9656 of 2006 SAKINDRA ROY . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 02. 19.05.2011 After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State and on going through the impugned order, I do not find any merit in the writ petition for the reason that the trial court as well as appellate court has recorded the finding that the charges leveled against the petitioner have been proved in enquiry, as the petitioner could not lead any evidence to demolish the charges rather he did not cooperate in the enquiry by not providing the documents required to be examined, by which it could be seen that in fact quota lifted by him was sold and distributed to the consumers. Accordingly, the licensing authority as well as the appellate authority has recorded a finding that despite the lifting of quota there was no proof of distribution of kerosene oil and food grains to the card- holders. Thus, the petition being devoid of merit dismissed. Mkr. ( Prakash Chandra Verma, J. )