IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37184 of 2010 SUBODH THAKUR son of Dwarika Thakur Resident of village-Amthua, P.S.-Kako, District-Jehanabad. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 26.3.2011. Heard Mr. Vijay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Indu Bala Pandey, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. The sole petitioner, who was husband of the deceased, apprehends his arrest in connection with Kako P.S. Case No.122 of 2006 registered for the offence under sections 304B and 201 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of anticipatory bail. The petitioner and his other family members were made accused in the first information report on accusation of committing offence under sections 304B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. In this case the police after through investigation found the case as ‘mistake of fact’ and, as such, final report was submitted vide annexure-2. It appears that the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate differing with the final report has taken cognizance of the offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that some of the other accused persons i.e. father-in-law, mother-in-law and brother of the husband of the deceased have been extended privilege of anticipatory bail. In view of the fact that after through investigation 2 the police submitted final report, the court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for extending privilege of anticipatory bail. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of one month from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri Ravi Ranjan, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jehanabad in connection with Kako P.S. Case No. 122 of 2006 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)