IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Sl NO.^POF 2007 ^ PETITIONER : >< .^%^ LVK'-':'<V..-"" ^•^.'-A .-•^•:'\<rv <3 K. K. Pandey, S/o. Late Shri D. R. Pandey, Aged about 50 years, Presently posted as Assistant Director Horticulture at Office of Assistant Director Horticulture, Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) y..^ •-'^' V E RS U^ RESPONDENTS ^•^.f <!A~^ e~y^. i-®^;> "I '®'"i ^JA^ State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Department ofAgriculture, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Director, Directorate Horticulture and Forest Area, Chhattisgarh Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Ram Kishore Sharma, Senior Horticulture Development Officer, Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION QFJNDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF_WR!TJN THE—NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS PROHIBITION AND_OTHERSUITABLE WRIT OR_WRITS DIRECTION OR^IRECTIONS ORDER OR ORDERS. ./ ^•'^" e^o^-"; ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Sinale Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pritinker Dhwaker PETITiONER Writ Petition (Sl No. 6517 of 2007 K.K. Pandev RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisaarh & others. JF~s- *!»," iui u ic Shri Ashish Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Apvind Dubey, Fsnd Ls'vVycr •State/respondents No. 1 and 2- Shri H.S. Patel, counsel for respondent No.3. WRITPETITiQNUNDERARTICLEJZ^QFTHE CONSTSTUTSON OF !?JDSA QRDER (05.07.2009) With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard finallv Challenqe in the instant writ petition is to the order dated 18.10.2007 (Annexure P-1) passed by the State Government wherebv the petitioner was transferred from the post of A&sistant Director, Horticulture at Raiaarh to the post of Incharae Deputv Director, in the office of Assistant Director Horticuiture, Durn, in violation of the transfer policv. This Court entertainina the arievance ofthe petitioner had aranted stav in his favour vide order dated 14.11 2007- In view ofthe fact that this petition was filed on 25.10.2007 and stav was also aranted in favour of the petitioner, the transfer order, so far as it relates to the petitioner is hereby quashed. However. the State Government would be at libertv to DSSS an order ifthe administrative exiaencv so warrant. With the above observation. the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar