IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 444 of 2009 Date of decision: 20.01.2010 Balraj Singh ...Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. RK Sharma, Advocate for respondents No. 2 to 4. -.- 1. To be referred to the reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M.KUMAR, J. The only issue raised before the Tribunal was whether the petitioner had educational qualification for appointment to the post of Technician T-II-3. It is undisputed that three years Diploma/Bachelors Degree in Agriculture was required as per circular dated 13.2.1991 (R-6). The petitioner did not have the aforesaid qualification and, therefore, he has been non-suited on that ground. We find no legal infirmity in the order passed by the Tribunal warranting admission of the petition. Dismissed. (M.M.KUMAR) JUDGE 20.01.2010 (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) mk JUDGE