C.W.P.No. 17844 of 2004. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P.No. 17844 of 2004. Date of Decision : 26.11.2008. Jai Narain and others Petitioners. VERSUS State of Haryana and others. Respondents. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH. --- Present:- Mr. Shailendra Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Palika Monga, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. R.S.Longia, Advocate, for Mr. Arun Walia, Advocate, for HUDA. --- 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? M.M.KUMAR,J. The petitioners have prayed for quashing notifications issued under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on 14.8.2003 (Annexure P-2) and 10.4.2004(Annexure P-9). Their principal ground of challenge is that they have raised 'A' class residential houses. The construction is, however, admitted to be class 'B' and is conceded to be raised before Section 4 notification is almost C.W.P.No. 17844 of 2004. 2 all the cases. The Director Urban Estate, Haryana has submitted his report dated 26.9.2008 which is available on the file of C.W.P.No. 14769 of 2006. Learned counsel for the petitioners state that as per instructions given to him land of all the petitioners stand released from acquisition in accordance with the recommendation made by the Director because there are built up area on the land. However, it is pointed out that in the report of the Director, some of the names have not been correctly mentioned which would not make difference for the purpose of disposal of the writ petition. According to the report of the Director, the proportionate area has also been released from acquisition which would amount to the area equivalent to the constructed released area. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. (M.M.KUMAR ) JUDGE 26.11.2008 ( JORA SINGH) Anoop JUDGE