IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BELASPUR PETITIONERS Ku. Mangal Aj D/o Shri Gondka Ram Aj, aged about 38 years, Occupation Service, posted as L.D.T. at Kanya Ashram — Kutm, Tahsil 85 District Bijapur (C.G.). R/o village — Rajur, Post Tokapal, Tahsil a Jagdalpur, District Bastar (co). Shakuntla Nag D/o Late Shri Sairam Nag, aged about 42 years, Occupation Service, posted as L.D.T. at Kanya Ashram — Nelasnar, Block Bhairamgarh, Tahsil 85 District Bijapur (C.G.), R/o village — Badeaarapur, Post Tokapal, Tahsil — Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) Sanju Prasad W/ o Shri Chandrashekhar Prasad, aged’ about 4O years, Occupation Service, posted as L.D.T. at Kanya Ashram — Nelasnar, Block Bhairamgarh, Tahsil 85 District Bijapur (C.G.}, R/o Shanti Nagar Ward, Jagdalpur, Tahsil — Jagdalpur, District Bastar (cc) Laxmi Korsha w/o-Shri B.K. Korsha, aged about 4O years, Occupation Service, posted as L.D.T. at Kanya Ashram — Jangla, Block Bhairamgarh, Tahsil 85 District Bijapur (C.G.), R/o Village 85' Post Nemeda, Block 8a Tahsil Bijapur, District Bijapur (C.G.) Aadi Tellam w/o Shri Lakhmuram Tellam, aged about 34 years, Occupation Service, posted as L.D.T. at Kanya Ashram ~ Dhanora, Block Bijapur, Tahsil & District Bijapur (C.G.), R/o Village Manjhipura, Post — Itpal, Tahsil and District Bijapur (C.G.) (Pg 2%; 1. WRIT PETITION [S NO.55M OF 2009 S.B. @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (SE No. 5566 of2009 PETITIONERS : Ku. Mangal Aj & Others. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTII U IION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Amiya Kant Tiwarii Advocate for the petitioners. Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents 1 to 3. ORDER ORAL) (Passed on 25 day 0f September,2009) Heard learned counsel for the parties. . Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Coul’L rendered in Smt. A.Lali v. State afChhamsgarh & Others}, thus the petitioners may be permitted to make a representation to decide their case in the light of aforestated decision, subject to verification asto whether the respondent No. 4~lnstitute is a Government Aided school and the petitioners are teacher within the sanctioned strength. . Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents 1 to 3 submits that in the event, the petitioners make a representation: the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks horn the date of receipt ofthe representation. . In View of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the . Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. petitioners, nothing survives in this petition for adjudications. Egp l Sd/ vi l satish-K- Agttihotri . ”- Judge Nxs_\ r 12007(1)BLJ 265 -