IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MP(M) No. 1075 of 2010. Date of Decision:30.9.2010. _______________________________________________ Sawarna Devi and another. ….Petitioners. Versus. State of H.P. ….Respondent. Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge. Whether approved for reporting2?No. For the petitioner : Mr. N.K.Thakur, Advocate. For Respondent. : Mr. P.K.Sharma, Addl. Advocate General with Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Dy. Advocate General. Dev Darshan Sud, J.(Oral). This petition has been filed on behalf of the mother-in-law and the husband of the deceased. I have perused the record and gone through the statement made by the deceased in P.G.I, Chandigarh, where she was admitted after she had suffered burn injuries. She exonerates the husband Sanjay and states that Sanjay and her brother-in-law Sanjeev Kumar rescued her at the time when she had set herself on fire. So far as the case of Smt.Sawarna Devi is concerned, it is a clear cut statement of the deceased that she was involved in distressing her. In these circumstances, so far as Sanjay-petitioner No.2 is concerned, the order dated Whether reporters of the Local papers are allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 27th September, 2010 is confirmed. He will be bound by all the conditions as imposed therein and shall apply for bail afresh when challan is filed in Court. Smt. Sawarna Devi shall be taken into custody forthwith. A submission is made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that at the time when the incident occurred, Smt. Sawarna Devi was not present on the spot and, therefore, could not be implicated in the offences. This submission is rejected as the statement of the deceased is clear that it was the constant acts of the sister-in-law and mother-in-law which forced her to commit suicide. The petition is disposed of. Copy dasti. (Dev Darshan Sud), Judge. September 30, 2010(R)