IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.(5) o. 5375 / zoos Sm‘r. Shashi Pmbha Sonpure/ W/o Shr'i Shashikanf Sonpur‘e, Aged abou‘r 41 years, Pe’ri’rioner‘ "’ Asst. Teacher, 66W. air-is Middle School Darri, Block-KhaTgor‘a/Pali, DisT : Kor‘ba-(C.6.) Versus Sfm‘e of ChhaTTisgarh Through - The Secre‘rary, Departmem‘ of School EducaTion, D.K.S. Bhowa‘n, Raipuh, Disf : Ruipur—(C.6.) ; Resgondems :1. 2. Disfrief Educa‘rion Officer Disf : Korbo-(C.G.) Asst Commissioner v“ Tribal Welfare Deparfmen’r, Disl’ : Korbo—(C.6.) 4. Block Educhl'ion Officer, o KhoTgoro, Dis? : Korbo-(Ce‘) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT. WRITS, DIRECTION ETC TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. N g k f HIsH couaT or CHHATrIssARI—I AT 3ILA§PUR w. 9(5) No. 5365 of 2006 Pe‘ri‘l'ioner- : Sm1'. Shakun Manikpuri Versus Respondenfs Sfa‘fe of ‘Chha'H’isgur'h & ofhers And W. P.(S) No. 5375 of 2006 Smf. Shashi Prabha Sonpure Versus Sfa‘l’e of Chhaffisgarh & ofhers Pefifioner Responden'fs Single Benth: Hon‘ble Mr. Jusfice Sa?ish K. Agnihofri. Shri Anil Singh Rajpuf, Advooa'l'e for The PeTi‘rioners. E Shri V.V.5. Moor‘fhy. Dy. Advoca‘fe General wi'rh 5min Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt Advocate for The responden‘rs/S‘mfe. ' O R D E R (9m Ocfober, 2006) . Learned counsel appearing fof 'rhe’pefii'ioners submi'f fhaf while working as Assisfan'r Teachers/Upper Division Teachers, the l pe‘i’ifioners have gone on 'irainihg 1'0 improve 'rheir qualifica'iions on " 'l'heir own expenses and acquired B.Ed./B.T.I Examina‘iion Cer‘l'ificaie. .iThe presen‘r wri'f pe'iifions, being W.P.(s) Nos. 5365/2006 and 5375/2006 involve similar fad's and common ques'i'ion of law. Thus, These pefiiions are being disposed of by 'rhis common order. . According To learned counsel for ihe pefifioners, ‘ihe pe‘ii'iioners are enfi'rled 1'0 +wo advance incremen‘is in view of fhe decision of $ 6 +his Courf in fhe case of Yashwam Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corpora1'ion, Durg and another {2006’ (E) MPJR-CG 96}. This Cour‘r in fhe case of Yashwanf Kumar- Bhamdwaj Vs. Municipal Corpomticn, Durg and ano'rher (supra), came t9 'rhe conclusion Tha‘r *he +eachers, wha had ob‘fuined B. Ed./B.T.I. Examinafion Cerfificafe on his own expenses, are covered by The circular dafed 24.12.98 issued by fhe Sfa're Government of Madhya Pradesh. 4. Learned counsel for 1'he pe‘ri‘l’ioners fur‘rlner submifs fha'r fhe facts and ques'lion of law involved in we presen'r cases are squarely covered by decision of 'H'iis Cour-1' in vfhe case of Yashwan‘r Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporafion, Durg and anofher (Supra), +0 which learned counsel appearing for fhe respondenfs fairly concedes and agrees wi'l’h fhe avermen'l’ made by learned counsel appearing for 'l'he pefifioners. 5. Accordingly, fhe wrif pefitions are allowed in Terms of 1'he- order passed in The case of Yashwan‘r Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, burg and ano'l'her (Supra), subjec'r fo verificafion of 'l'he facf as fo whe'fher fhe pefi'rioners have acquired B. Ed./B.T.I. Examina‘l’ion Cerfificafes on fheir own expenses or n'o'l'. No order -a$ ‘l’O COSTS. 6. A copy of fhis order be placed on record of one connecfed wri'l' l pei-ifion. .m Fix N e Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge