ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4997 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO. 4997 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO. 4997 OF 2006 IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO. 1450 OF APPEAL NO. 1450 OF APPEAL NO. 1450 OF 2002 2002 2002 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. Anand Kulkarni, i/by Mr. Rajiv Patil for the applicant. None for the respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 9th October, 2007. : 9th October, 2007. : 9th October, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant makes a statement that all respondents are served. None appeared for the respondents. This is an application for restoration of the Civil Application No. 1154 of 2004, which was dismissed for want of prosecution. 2. Considering the averments made in para 4 to 8 and as ( 2 ) sufficient reasons have been made out, I am inclined to grant prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c). The application, therefore, is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c). The parties to take steps, accordingly within two weeks. 3. The civil application is, disposed of accordingly. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]