^ w- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition (Cr.) No. 2627 of 2009 Petitioner Versus Respondents 1. 2. 3. 4. P. K. Sharma, Executive Officer, presently working in Antyayyavsayi, Cooperative, Fiaance and Developiaent, BUaspur, R/o Civil Lines, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, C.G. Chhatisgarh State Antyavyavasayi Cooperative, Fiaance and Developcaient Corporation, Raipur, through its Managing Director. Collector-cuni-President, District Antyavyavasayi Cooperative, Finance and Developnient Corporation, Durg. Supermtendentof Pollce, Durg, C.G, Town Inspector, Durg, C,G. (Writ Petition nader Article 226 ofthe Constitution oflndia) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) ShriT. K. Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M. P. S. Bhatia, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the respondents. O RD E R (oral) ( Passed on this 27th day ofJuly, 2009) Heard. 1. Learned counsel appearuig for tJie petitioner, on iastnictions, subniits that the petitioner does not waiit to contest this raatter on nierits, at this stage, however, the respondent No.l/Managiag Director, Chhattisgarh State Antyavyavasayi Co-operative, Finance and Developiaent Corporation, Raipur niay be directed to hear the petitioner before taking any decision on the letter (Annexure P/7). 2. Learned counsel appearmg for the respondents/State has no objection. 3. In view of fhe above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that, ifno action is taken on the letter (Annexure P/7), it is expedient that the respondent No. 1 inay hear the petitioner before taldng any decision on the letter. —— Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Thalmr JudgC