1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NOS.7593/09, 7594/09, 7595/09, 7596/09, 7603/09 AND 7604/09 _____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s Orders appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Mr.Vishwanath Talkute for the petitioners. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 7TH OCTOBER, 2009 P.C. :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. These writ petitions challenge the common order dated 9.7.2009 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Pune Division, Pune by which the petitioners’ applications seeking reference of disputed signatures to handwriting expert have been rejected for the reasons stated in paragraph 3 thereof. Looking to the nature of order, I am not inclined to entertain these writ petitions in exercise of the extremely limited jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 2 However, looking to the nature of the controversy I observe that the Addl. Commissioner while deciding the appeals shall peruse the disputed signatures and compare them with the admitted signatures and express his opinion in the final judgment disposing of the appeals filed by the petitioners. It is also open to the Addl. Commissioner to suo motu refer the disputed signatures to the handwriting expert, if he so desires. While making this observations I shall not be understood to have issued such direction to the Addl. Commissioner. With these observations the writ petitions are disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)