vm^ .."l.^UI.'u^L- -L-V^-^'-V^/'-^.-^-: ^t' APPI.I(M»S ^N %li LS";';.-1 ^.^ MW /sy' ^y NON-^PPLICANT -INiWBiH©lt^ ^s0iyeilffl iaS^ARH;^:^B^SPl»< .^^fflH^'ri'ISG^RH^.:^ ..,...•': •:l'M.(?.©.»).;::-..::%%srlOr^006.:':1: ^iKnsfaiia©haTanSahu,son<)f'Palau i i K^lAa, agedabout65years, v^'%llitivatQr," ^•^ '.'r^ • ::'. i ''^^ ^i|iat||^^son^^^p^^ ^ul ^^a^ miaor,^^^ ^eiEi^sguardia^^lder^u-oth^ ^ TSI^en^^^^^^^ K^ C&aFatrSa]fe,agedaboiit30ye^ AllyCNltivators rnul residents O^ViUag^ iBa^lli^ QgSanl^^tahsiliand^stact]^^^ S|^P.)(n6w€lifaatfe VERSUS :..••'::."-':;1^^ c-v^xittjlata, daughteF ofSiwder Kolla, ^fe.Gi^asant^olta,agedaboyf45r Years^Gyltiyatol-andTOSulentof YiUageBagaFdarh^P.C.No.42, ^^^^^^ R^ and^stnc1:%l]asaniimc^^.P.) ^ ^(now^Miiatt^a)^'.,:..^-;^^ B.SiiT. ;:'-i/, XI-HC-22 3I1^T?iT !<•<!* 3t1^?T gsii^flf^ T ''A. 3^?ipn?pr, ®€twre,fii?ii«y ^ •sT^wra^ ^^^ ' liini shii<»" """""""" t^ 200 • RM """" so^T B?gfw ^ifei 27.11.2006 Shri H.B. Agrawal, SeniorAtl the applicants. None for the non-applicant. Learned counsel for the ap||> No.806 of 1999 was dismissed by| absence of both the parties, therefl: the same, without notioe Considered, The prayer is a| Heard finally. On 31-10-2006 when civil hearing none appeared even on dismissed for want ofappearance 4 Applicants, for restoration of the assigning reason that ccunsel for appear when the case was called fi| Leamed counsel atso in support the application. I am satlsfied that applican^ appearing when the case was passed In civil revision No. 806 of| re-admitted for hearing. A copy of this order be No.806of19M. oftls chPI'ftrf-ifrT W^ff ^' te^ <i^ it< ^aTf^iTsn^T vocate with Shri Jitendra Gupta, counsel for •licants submits and prays that civit revision |this Court vide order dated 31-10-2006, in >re, the instant application for restoration of to the othei) partiesean be heard and decided. lowed. < ( (^vision No.806 of 1^9 was called out for second call, therefore, the revlsion was tlie petttjoners, who are applteants herein. civil revlsion, have filed this application |the petjtionere, due to oversight failed to ^r hearing. His absence was not mala fde. contention has filed an afRdavit along with callted were prevented by sufRcient oause from ^d, therefore, the order dated 31-10-2006 11999 is set aside and the civil revision is placed on the record of civil revlsion Sd/- V.K.Slirivastava Judge (^y^)