IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 159 OF 2007 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 361 OF 2007. Sou.Bhikubai Parvat Nikale & Anr. ...... ...... ...... Appellants V/s Sahadu Shripat Kapse ...... ...... ...... Respondent. Mr.M.M.Sathaye, Adv. For the appellants. Mr.Kishore Patil, Adv. For respondent. CORAM: R.V. MORE, J. 17th NOVEMBER, 2008. PC: Heard Mr.Sathaye, learned advocate for the appellants and Mr.Patil, learned advocate for the respondent. This is plaintiffs' second appeal. Suit was filed for declaration that the compromise filed on record in Appeal No.46/97 in Nashik court was null and void. The trial Court dismissed the suit. The lower appellate court confirmed the decree passed by the trial Court. Lower appellate court on page 34 of judgment has observed that both the parties were present before the Court at the time of compromise and they have admitted the terms of the said compromise. The said terms were read over and explained to them in Marathi. There is endorsements to that effect at the bottom of the compromise. The 1 lower appellate court did not find any truth in the appellant' s case that the compromise was outcome of fraud. In that view of the matter I am not inclined to interfere in the aforesaid second appeal especially when no substantial question of law is involved. Hence second appeal stands dismissed. Civil application No.361 of 2007 does not survive same also stands disposed accordingly. 2. At this stage Mr.Sathaye seeks extension of status-quo which was earlier granted in June, 2007, for a period of four weeks. Mr.Patil, learned advocate for respondent does not seriously oppose the prayer. In that view of the matter status quo granted earlier is continued for a further period of four weeks from today. 17.11.08 (R.V. MORE, J.) 2