1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6187 OF 2007 Sharadkumar s/o Sampatrao Kothawale, R/o-307-308, Shobhana, D.G. Nagar No.2, Ambad, Nashik-10. ...PETITIONER. VERSUS 1) Mahatma Phule Krushi Vidyapith, Rahuri, Dist-Ahmednagar, Through its Registrar, and others. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri. A.N. Nagargoje Advocate for Petitioner. Shri. M.N. Navandar Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Shri. R.P. Phatke, A.G.P. for Respondent No.3. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 8TH JUNE, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2 2. We have perused the order dated 10th April, 2008 passed by this Court (Coram: J.N. PATEL AND S.B. DESHMUKH, JJ.). The Respondent University filed affidavit in reply. In Para 18, the deponent submits that: "18. With reference to para no.16 of the Petition I say and submit that, the contents therein are substantively correct. The grievance raised by Petitioner was put forth before the Grievance Committee and the Grievance Committee of this deponent has not accepted the request of promotion of the Petitioner to the cadre of AR/AC as he was not fulfilling the minimum academic qualification as per university Resolution dated 23.12.2003 and the same fact has been intimated to the petitioner." 3. In the light of the statement made on oath by the deponent, Writ Petition is disposed 3 of. In case the Petitioner is aggrieved by the communication issued by the University, the Petitioner may resort to the appropriate remedies as permissible in law. [K.K. TATED, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] asb/JUNE10/wp6187.07