CWP (T) No. 4729 of 2008. 24.6.2009 Present: Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate for the respondent. The petitioner has sought regularization as a Clerk. It has come in the reply that the respondent-University was likely to fill up the posts which have become available. The reply was filed by the respondent on 6.1.1998. It can safely be presumed that the petitioner’s case might have been considered against the vacancies which had become available as per averment contained in the reply. However, in the interest of justice, in case the petitioner has not been considered, the same shall be done by the respondent in accordance with law within a reasonable period. In view of the observations made hereinabove, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), J. June 24, 2009. (cr)