THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 19630 OF 2010 Dated: 18.08.2010 Between: J.Devender Reddy and another ..... PETITIONERS AND The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Deputy Commissioner, Circile-2, Uppal, Hyderabad and others .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 19630 OF 2010 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the action of the respondents in not granting the building permission for construction of residential house in the plot bearing No.38 in survey No.42 situated at Ramanthapur, Uppal Mandal, Hyderabad as well as plot No.14 part and 15 part in survey No.42 situated at Indira Nagar Colony, Ramanthapur, Uppal Mandal, Hyderabad, as arbitrary and illegal. It is pleaded by the petitioners that the action of the respondents in not considering the petitioners application on the ground that the plots of the petitioners may fall in the submergence of full tank level of Peddacheruvu tank/Ramanthapur tank, as unjustified and unwarranted. When the matter is taken up for consideration, it is brought to my notice by the learned counsel for the petitioners that in identical circumstances W.P.No.16397 of 2004 was disposed of by this Court by order dated 13.04.2005 with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the application of the petitioner therein for building permission in accordance with the building rules and regulations and master plan etc. of the Urban Development Authority and if all the requirements are satisfied, he shall not reject the same merely on the basis that the plot falls within the full tank level of Peddacheruvu. There was also a direction in the said order that the petitioner therein shall give an undertaking that in the event the property is acquired for preserving the land for full tank level, he shall not claim compensation for the structure to be raised by him. It is represented that the said order was also confirmed by a Division Bench of this Court. The said fact has not been disputed by the learned standing counsel appearing for the Corporation. In the circumstances, the Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 13.04.2005 in W.P.No.16397 of 2004 with a direction that the same shall be read as part of this order. No costs. ___________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 18.08.2010 Note: Issue CC of order in two days (B/o) Ivd