FARHAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 136 OF 2007 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2487 OF 2005 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. Mukul Kulkarni, Advocate for appellants. CORAM: K.U. CHANDIWAL J. DATED: 30th April, 2010. P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Kulkarni. The concurrent findings recorded against the plaintiff are subject of criticism. The plaintiff basically cannot travel beyond the sale deed or beyond the boundaries or the description referred in the sale deed concerning the property which he has purchased. This clarification is certainly warranted as the issue No. 1 is answered by the Court as plaintiff has no title. The plaintiff asserts right to the property, beyond the property subject of sale deed. It was certainly exceeding in area than reflected in the sale deed. The controversy was more leaning to the Potkharab of area of the land purchased. The findings recorded by both the Courts does not suffer from any infirmity, it is in tune with the record and the evidence. No interference except above clarification. Second appeal dismissed. No costs. Civil application disposed of. [ K.U. CHANDIWAL J.] ssc/sa136.07