- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.836 OF 2006 IN CRI.APPEAL NO.558 OF 2005 Ravindra Subhana Dadake ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.Abhaykumar Apte Appointed Advocate for Applicant Mrs.V.R.Bhosale APP for the State ... CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, AND CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, AND CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : JULY 05, 2007 DATE : JULY 05, 2007 DATE : JULY 05, 2007 P.C. [ PER SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]: P.C. [ PER SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]: P.C. [ PER SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant has been convicted under Sections 498-A and 302 of IPC. The applicant is now seeking bail. Deceased Saidabai was married to the applicant. It is the prosecution case that as the - 2 - applicant was addicted to liquor and he was having a love affair with one Mangal on account of which there were frequent quarrels between the applicant and his wife and death of Saidabai was caused on account of act of the applicant. The evidence on record clearly implicates the applciant. Hence, in our opinion, this is not a fit case to grant bail. 3. Application is rejected. [R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]