1 Lrs IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No.64/2010. Krushna Sopana Salunkhe ..Petitioner. vs. The District Resettlement Officer, Punarvasan (Land)Pune and ors ..Respondents. Mr Y. J. Master, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr S.N. Patil, A.G.P., for Respondents. CORAM: D.K. DESHMUKH AND A.R.JOSHI,JJ DATED: 14TH JANUARY,2010 P.C.:- The petitioner claims that he has entered into an agreement to purchase the same land with Respondent No.3 who was allotted the land under a rehabilitation project. By the order impugned respondent No.3 has been granted permission to sell the land. The petitioner cannot be said 2 to be aggrieved by that order because even the petitioner wants respondent No.3 to sell the land what is interesting is that the petitioner has not, even, filed any suit for seeking a decree of specific performance when it appears that respondent No.3 has already entered into an agreement to sell the same land in favour of somebody else. We find no substance in the petition. Petition is hereby rejected. (D.K. DESHMUKH,J) (A.R.JOSHI,J)