IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15378 of 2010 SARTAJ ALAM @ SARTAR ALAM, SON OF KAMALUDDIN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-ALOKHBANI, P.S. KALYANPUR, DISTRICT-EAST CHAMPARAN. …………………………………………………...PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………………..OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajendra Kishore Prasad, Mrs. Rekha Prasad and Mohit Kishore Prasad, Advocates. For the State : Mr. U.S.P. Singh, A.P.P. ------------- 2. 13.5.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been named in the First Information Report only on the basis of the statement of one of the co-accused, who was allegedly apprehended on the spot. However, neither the petitioner was apprehended on the spot nor had any incriminating articles been recovered from his possession. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Sartaj Alam @ Sartar Alam, is - 2 - directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri Birendra Shukla, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Sadar Motihari, District-East Champaran, in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No.141/2009, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be the close relative or his family member, who will file affidavit before the court below giving full genealogy showing his or her relationship with the petitioner. Further, after his release in this case, if the petitioner is again found to be involved in criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Further, the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial in the court below. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of the trial, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)