IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI MONDAY, THE 29TH MARCH 2010 / 8TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(Crl.).No. 111 of 2010(S) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MUHAMMED KABEER K., AGED 47 YEARS, KOTTOOR HOUSE, KADATHOOR P.O., THAZHAVA, KARUNAGAPPALLY. BY ADV. SRI.K.ABDUL JAWAD RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM. 2. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KARUNAGAPPALLY. 3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHAVARA. 4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHAVARA. 5. NISAR, S/O.KASIM PILLA, OOTTUPURAYIL, MUKUNDAPURAM P.O., CHAVARA. 6. KASIM PILLA, OOTTUPURAYIL, MUKUNDAPURAM P.O., CHAVARA. 7. SIDDIQUE, S/O.KASIM PILLAI, OOTTUPURAYIL, MUKUNDAPURAM P.O., CHAVARA. BY G.P. SRI. P.N. SUKUMARAN ADV. SRI.C.S.MANU FOR R5,6&7 SRI.S.K.PREMRAJ FOR R5,6 & 7 THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R. BASANT & M.C. HARI RANI, JJ. ------------------------------------------------- W.P.(Cri) No.111 of 2010-S ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of March, 2010 JUDGMENT Basant,J. This judgment must be read in continuation of our earlier order dated 26/3/10. 2. Today, when the matter came up, the petitioner along with his wife is present. He is represented by his counsel. Respondents 5, 6 and 7 are personally present. They are represented by their counsel. 3. The learned counsel submit that in pursuance of the discussions which took place in the Chamber on 26/3/10, the parties have now agreed as follows: (i) The alleged detenue Muhsina shall today accompany the petitioner and his wife to their residence. (ii) On 8/4/10 the petitioner and the family shall arrange a W.P.(Cri) No.111 of 2010 -: 2 :- function wherein they will formally approve and accept the marriage between the 5th respondent and the alleged detenue. (iii) On 8/4/10 the alleged detenue shall accompany the 5th respondent to his house as married couple approved by the petitioner and the family. (iv) It is agreed that from today till 8/4/10 the alleged detenue and the 5th respondent can have contacts over the telephone; but personal meetings and interactions between them shall not take place till that date. (v) This case shall be posted to 9/4/10 on which day the parties shall appear before this Court to report compliance with the above stipulations. 4. We accept the settlement between the parties. 5. This writ petition is allowed in part accordingly on the terms so agreed upon between the parties. Sd/- R. BASANT (Judge) Sd/- M.C. HARI RANI (Judge) Nan/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge W.P.(Cri) No.111 of 2010 -: 3 :-