1 S.B. Cr. Misc. Petition No. 1834/2007 In S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 1384/05 (Firma Karni Ram Banwari Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.) Date of order : 20.11.2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr. B.S.Sandhu for the applicant-respondent No.2. Mr. Ashok Upadhhay, P.P. By the instant criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2 Sukhdev Singh submits that when the two criminal misc. petitions being S.B.Criminal Misc. Petition No.1383/2005 and 1384/05 came to be heard and decided on 06.9.2007, the counsel for the private respondent No.2 Sukhdev Singh appeared in S.B.Cr. Misc. Petition No.1384/05, however, it appears that due to inadvertent typographical error, the name of the counsel for the private respondent No.2 has not been incorporated in the order dated 6.9.2007. This fact has not been disputed by the counsel for the petitioner firm appearing therein and record maintained by the Court Master also shows that Mr. B.S.Sandhu appeared for the private respondent No.2 Sukhdev Singh in the aforesaid criminal misc. petition. 2 In this view of the matter, in the order dated 6.9.2007, the name of learned counsel Mr. B.S.Sandhu is incorporated and it is made clear that Mr. B.S.Sandhu learned counsel appeared for the private respondent No.2 Sukhdev Singh. The criminal misc. petition is accordingly disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp