IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.270 of 2011 Bijendra Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 03. 07.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The prayer of the petitioner is for quashing the first information report of Balia P.S. Case No. 95 of 2009 registered on 24th of June 2009 for the alleged offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 448, 323, 504, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. It is submitted that the first information report is antedated and as such, it deserves to be quashed. Learned counsel for the State on the other hand submits that the allegation of the petitioner is incorrect. Considering the submissions of the parties, it would appear that the first information report was registered on 24th of June 2009, whereas this writ application has been filed on 7th of March 2011 alleging that it is an antedated and as such, it deserves to be quashed. The present writ application has been filed after a good delay without any valid justification. Besides the above, the serious disputed question of fact is that whether this first information report is antedated or not cannot be decided appropriately in writ proceeding. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter, the writ application is accordingly dismissed. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)