IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39354 of 2008 BRAJESH SINGH @ BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH, son of Late Angad Singh, resident of Village Masarhi, P.S. Ramgarh, District Kaimur ----Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 31.3.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No.68 of 2008 for the offences under sections 436, 379, 341, 323, 427, 504/34 and 120B of the Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the primary allegation is against co-accused Atiranjan Singh and not against this petitioner. However, the petitioner is alleged to have come along with the co-accused Atiranjan at the place of the informant and they participated in demolishing the house of the informant forcibly. The said house was earlier put on fire and at that time, co-accused Atiranjan was present. Submission is that the petitioner is not connected with the alleged offence and as such he deserves anticipatory bail. 2 The learned APP appearing for the State on perusal of the case diary submits that the allegation against this petitioner is that he along with co-accused Atiranjan went to the house of the informant and they assaulted her and also took away other articles and, as such, the petitioner does not deserve anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the parties and the allegations made in the F.I.R. as also the materials collected against the petitioner during investigation, I am not inclined to allow this application seeking anticipatory bail. The application is, accordingly, dismissed. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)