THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 8802 of 2010. ORDER: (Per Goda Raghuram, J) This writ petition is filed the Officers of the State questioning the common order dt. 22.12.2009 of the learned A.P. Administrative Tribunal (for short ‘the Tribunal’) in O.A.Nos. 7623 of 2006, 7421 of 2006 and 7509 of 2006. This writ petition is against the said order in so far as it pertains to O.A.No. 7623 of 2006. The O.A. was filed by the un-official respondents herein aggrieved by the order dt. 26.9.2006 and consequential proceedings issued by the 1st petitioner, seeking to recover excess expenditure incurred in the execution of works under the NABARD scheme from the salaries of the applicants. The Tribunal, in view of the fact that six years elapsed from the date of expenditure and the delay in conducting departmental enquiry, directed the respondents (petitioners herein) to consider the case of the applicant for promotion to the next higher category without reference to the impugned charge memo issued to him with liberty to punish the applicant in the promotion post if the charges are proved. Against the common order pertaining to another O.A., the petitioners herein filed W.P.No. 12107 of 2010 and the said writ petition was disposed of on 28.7.2011 directing the un-official respondents to conclude the enquiry and the if petitioners are not found guilty; their cases shall be considered for further promotion. It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner Sri.V.Madhusudan Rao and acceded by the learned Government Pleader for Service-I that the Judgement dt. 28.7.2011 in W.P.No. 12107 of 2010 covers the issues in this writ petition as well. In view of the joint submission, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order of this Court in W.P.No. 12107 of 2010 directing the petitioners to conclude the disciplinary enquiry (if not already concluded) against the unofficial respondents and if these employees are not found guilty of the charges for which they are charged, consider their cases for further promotion. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J ____________________________ G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY,J 14.12.2011. KRB. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 8802 of 2010. ORDER: (Per Goda Raghuram, J) Dt. 14.12.2011.