IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6401 of 2009 1. KAMAL SHARMA @ KAMAL VISHWAKARMA son of Ramdeyal Sharma, resident of village- Suryagarha, P.S.- Suryagarha, District- Lakhisarai. 2. Rajesh Vishwakarma, son of Subodh Vishwakarma, resident of village- Lakhisarai, P.S.- Lakhisarai, District- Lakhisarai. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- with Cr.Misc. No.1000 of 2009 BRAHA DEO YADAV @ AJAY KUMAR son of Jagdish Yadav, resident of village Garhi Bishanpur, P.S.-Lakhisarai, District- Lakhisarai. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- And Cr.Misc. No.5861 of 2009 RANJEET VISHWAKARMA son of Bundi Vishwakarma, resident of village Premdiha, P.S.- Halsi, District- Lakhisarai. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 10.08.2009 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The offence alleged is under sections 25(1- B)A/26/35 of the Arms Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they have been falsely implicated in this case and nothing has been recovered from their possession. It is further submitted that for the same occurrence subsequently another criminal case was registered against the petitioners vide Pakriwarawan P.S. Case No. 65 of 2008 for the alleged offence under sections 399 & 402 of the Indian Penal Code in which 2 they are on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and on perusal of the case diary submits that witnesses have stated about the involvement of these petitioners in connection with Bank robbery and arms were also recovered from the possession of the persons including the petitioners who were on the vehicle in question. Considering the submissions of the parties, as noticed above, and in the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to release the petitioners on bail. Their prayer for bail is, accordingly, rejected at this stage. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)