1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.07.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE R.MALA Crl.O.P.(MD)No.6874 of 2011 S.Vijayarathinam ... Petitioner Vs 1.The State rep.by its The Superintendent of of Police, Theni, Theni District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Theni Town Police Station, Theni, Theni District. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the first respondent to execute the non-bailable warrant by the second respondent in connection with E.A.No.2 of 2011 in C.C.No.102 of 2010 dated 29.03.2011 on the file of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Theni. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Senthil Kumar For Respondents: Mr.K.V.Rajarajan, Govt Advocate (Crl. Side) ORDER This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction to direct the first respondent to execute the non-bailable warrant by the second respondent in connection with E.A.No.2 of 2011 in C.C.No.102 of 2010 dated 29.03.2011 on the file of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Theni. 2. Heard Mr.J.Senthil Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also Mr.K.V.Rajarajan, learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Theni, has sent the several representations to the Gem Motors Pvt. Ltd., Coimbatore, to appear before the forum but the Gem Motors Pvt. Ltd., Coimbatore, failed to appear before the forum. Hence, the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Theni, has issued non bailable warrant in C.C.No.102 of 2010 dated 29.03.2011 against the Proprietor of the Gem Motors Pvt. Ltd., Coimbatore and which has been forwarded to the first respondent for the execution of non-bailable warrant, but, no action has been taken so far by the first respondent. Hence, the petitioner filed this petition before this Court. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) would submit in his argument that the first respondent police is taking effective steps for https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 executing the non-bailable warrant. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the first respondent is directed to execute the non-bailable warrant issued by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Theni, dated 29.03.2011 in C.C.No.102 of 2010 within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6 With the aforesaid direction, this petition is ordered. SD ASST REGISTRAR ( RTI Act ) /True Copy/ SUB ASST REGISTRAR gsr To 1.The Superintendent of of Police, Theni, Theni District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Theni Town Police Station, Theni, Theni District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. DM:2011:JULY:18:: Crl.O.P(MD).No.6874 of 2011 2P:4C:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/