wé tzaff IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHA'ITISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATI'ISGARH) WRIT PETITION (S) NO. é22q OF 2009 PETITIONER D. R. Hurmade Son of Late Shri Raghavji Hurmade, aged about 59 years, Presently posted as Assista nt Director, Horticulture Department, Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). VERSUS / 1. State of Chhattisgarh: the Secreta ry, Ag ricultu re Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The Director, Department of Horticulture‘ and Firm Forestry, Reena Apartment, First Floor, Pachpedi Naka, Raipur (C.G.). The Deputy Director, Department of Horticulture and Firm Forestry, Kothi No.40, Anand Nagar, Telibandha, Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA / :ZI ‘ HEGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRH‘ PETITION (S) No. 6224 of2009 ’ETYI‘EONER : DRHurmade. VERSUS RES?ONDENTS : State of Chhaitisgarh & Others. “ WRIT PETKTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA . Amit /\ E SB: Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Aahm’laotri. J. / V‘ ?resent: Shri Roop Naik, Advocate far the petitioner. Sim N.N.R0y, Fanei Lawyer for the Statefrespondems. ORDER ORAL} (Passed 011 19 day of November, 2W9) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, sabmits thai the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage exoeot that a direction may he issued to the respondents/State to consider 2. and decide the pending oepartmentai enquiry, as expeditiously as possible. Learned counsel appearing for the other side has no objection. 3. it is ordere& as prayed for. The respondent authorities are directed to consitler and decide the departmental enquiry, as expeditiously as pending possible. 4. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. V ’ so- > ” Agnsmtra satishK. ‘: i i Judge