IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.66663-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION:14.12.2006 Jagdish Singh ..........Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ..........Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present:- Shri J.S. Chowdhary, Sr. Advocate with Shri Sarvinder S. Grewal, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.S. Gill, AAG, Punjab. **** Petitioner Jagdish Singh apprehending his arrest in a non- bailable offence in case FIR No. 79 dated 25.2.2005 under Sections 465/467/468/471/474/120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Kotwali, Sangrur, has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail. I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the FIR. Counsel for the petitioner contends that during the police investigation, the petitioner was found innocent and subsequently, on the basis of the statement of complainant Balwant Singh as PW.1, the petitioner along with other persons has been summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C. to face trial. Counsel contends that some of the co-accused of the petitioner, who have also been summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C. have been granted anticipatory bail by the trial Court. Counsel for the petitioner further contends that in view of the order dated 3.11.2006, the petitioner has appeared before the trial Court Crl. Misc. No.66663-M of 2006 -2- and furnished his regular bail bonds, which have been accepted and attested and since then he is regularly appearing before the trial Court. In view of the above, the interim bail, granted vide order dated 3.11.2006 is made absolute. Disposed of accordingly. December 14, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) pooja JUDGE