IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 7TH AUGUST 2008 / 16TH SRAVANA 1930 RP.No. 793 of 2008(R) ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.5198/2008 Dated 13/03/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/APPLICANT/PETITIONER: ------------------------------------------------------------------- WHITE CASTLE R& R INDIA PVT.LTD., NETTOOR VILLAGE, THEVARA POST ERNAKULAM REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR. BY ADV. SMT.T.D.RAJALAKSHMI RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS AND ADDL. RESPONDENTS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 3. T.S.ASOK, S/O.THANKAPPAN NAIR, APSARA HOUSE, KURUNGANOOR MURI KOWDIAR VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. DENIEL VARGHESE, S/O.P.I.DANIEL POONCHONIKAVIL HOUSE, VENMONY POST., VENMONY VILLAGE,CHENGANNUR TALUK. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA ADV. SRI.D.SAJEEV FOR R4 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Rs/ ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------------------------- R.P.No.793/2008 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of August, 2008 O R D E R In this review, what the petitioner seeks is the deletion of the last sentence in paragraph 4 of the order dated 13th March, 2008, wherein the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is not making any claim over 13.5 cents covered by document No.2862/2007 is recorded. It is stated that, if this sentence is retained in that order, the rights of the parties, which are now pending adjudication before the civil court will be adversely affected. 2. I heard the counsel for the review petitioner and also respondents 3 and 4 herein. 3. Having heard both sides it is clarified that the aforesaid sentence occurring in paragraph 4 of the order dated 13th march, 2008 will not cause prejudice to the 2 contentions raised by either of the parties in the proceedings pending before the civil court. With this clarification review petition is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE vi. 3