-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5686 OF 2005 Daulat Jaysingh Ramsinghani ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... Mr.M.S.Mohite Advocate for Applicant Ms.S.V.Gajare A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : OCTOBER 10, 2005 DATE : OCTOBER 10, 2005 DATE : OCTOBER 10, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking quashing of proceedings in RCC No. 885/P/2001 pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 11th Court, Kurla Mumbai. The said case is under Sections 3,7 and 8 of Essential Commodities Act and under Sections 407 and 411 of IPC. 3. In the present case, it is seen that -2- investigation is over and the charge sheet has been filed. In view of this fact, the applicant can prefer an application for discharge before the trial Court. Liberty is given to the applicant to prefer the application for discharge before the trial Court. All contentions of the applicant are left open. 4. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]