(Jim/a) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH Writ petition (S) No.55/o £007 PETITIONER Yogesh Patel, aged about 43 years, S/o Shri Jawahar Lal Patel, Assistant Teacher 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secreta ry, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ,, 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, District, Raipur (C.G.) / Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raigah District Raigarh, (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Raigarh Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) f ~/ WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER. As mentioned in the Cause title. . ‘ ‘Ogw\(‘\\£\( o .. a. Govt. Higher Secondary School Nandeli, Block Raigarh $$Ga$$ Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) Q. get} Q‘ é) out VERSUS .N°551® . m 2063/ mmm WMvww‘m $a~fmawé¥r 5.3: HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. PRI'I 03-08-2009: deciding the representation of the him case of the petitioner is squar ly covered with the order passed in writ petition (S) No. 4248/2008. Counsel for the responden State submits that at this stage he can Court whether case of the petitioner is covered with the order passed in a orementionod writ petition. However, he submits that if the petitioner ma es a representation to the conoerned respondent, the same shall be deci ed strictly in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petition is aforesaid. lf the petitioner ma respondent within a period of Mo onths from the date of receipt of copy of decided within a further period of four not make any statement before th the petitioner. Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel La er for the State. At the outset counsel for Shri Anil Mourya, counset fo petitioner submits that he wanw to e withdraw this petition with liberty o make representation to the authority concerned. He also seeks a di ction to the concerned authority for itioner at an early date as according to petitioner strictly in accordance witt‘ law. l i this order, the same is expected to months from the date of its receipt. It is made clear that this the case and the authorities ages to Sd/— Pritinker Diwaer Judge mam (We) 'INKER DIWAKER‘ smissed as withdrawn with liberty as a represenwion to the concerned rt has not commented on the merits of decide the representation of the i t i k k