N HEGH SCIURT QF CHHsQW£$GARHz BELASPU§ Sééie §enc?}: Wm’bie 5hri an Qaegaheic Deshmukh J. $r.M.?.Wo.éGéi09 M 20 -——._._ wWm£ : i. Re$id$nt Raju S/o Amrit, of Jhilmiii aged (Junad'ih), abot 79 years, P. S‘ (CG) Pamgarh, D§smc€ JanggirnChspa Nanci Kumaf So Sammaf, aged abaut 24 years, Resident of Jhiimih' (Junadih), P. S. Pamgarh, District Jam‘gir—Champa (CG) Versus £g§iican€s g“ pa — ondwt Séate of Chhamsgarh, threugh P. S. (CG) Pamgarh, Dfstrict Janjgir—Champa P%fiti¢m ua’adér WSwratmn gac'kion 9f 4182 Crimmak a? ihe Revisian Cede 0f Ciiminal Frocedure for WWEga23312éag. m Fivesené: Shri V. C. Ottaiwar, Shré P. R. Pairankar, counsef for the applicanis. Pane! Lawyer far the $?ate. QEAL GREER k (Passeci on 0?—Q8~2009) Heavub v we order dated 05~05-20a3, CrEmmaz Re‘viséon dESmissec§ in default 0f t CrEmMa! Rewsian No.238/2009 med by the petmoners Lmder Section 482 of ihe CrFC. 2009 Naw, the peiikiorsers 0n under $ection 482 of the Cr.P.C. far restaraiiom of Crémmaf Revisiom N0238/20Q9. {2) the case manibned Nags/200$} wa$ ppiicai‘ion for restora%i0f3 of whéch Es regksmred as Cr.M.P.N0.285/2009, was afso dimiisssea im defauhf of the petéticners or: 18—08~ he petitioners. An a have fiieii ’ihé presen: appiicaté Cons§dering khe facis and circumstancea of above am! ihe iai‘ches on the part of '2h Seation 4o2 e pe%§tionars, the petition unoer efthe expo. is dismégsedlwMam ”5m f/‘ ,M/sdl- \ Duip Raos « aheb Deshmukh Judge Tamane g y , u m / Nanagawicam Be$g