IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38489 of 2010 1. MANGAL MAHTO 2. Anaro Devi @ Anaru Devi 3. Ram Bilash Mahto 4. Mauna Devi Versus 1. The STATE OF BIHAR 2. Lalita Devi ------ 2/ 25.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners are in-laws other than the husband. Torture, if any, is for demand of dowry, while the marriage is more than seven years earlier. Differences are there in between the wife and husband. Husband was kidnapped by complainant’s parental family members for which a case was filed vide Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 231 of 2009 by petitioner no. 2 and no liability can be fixed for maintenance of the complainant by these petitioners. Taking that into consideration, prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with C.R. No. 885 of 2009 and T.R. No. 2334 of 2010 above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Samastipur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)