LPA No. 371 of 2011(O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No. 371 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision 01.03.2011 Kalawanti and another ---Appellant Versus State of Punjab and others ---Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.S. MANN Present: Mr. K.S. Hissowal, Advocate for the appellants. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. 1. The instant appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent is directed against judgment dated 19.04.2010 rendered by the learned Single Judge while disposing of the writ petition. The learned Single Judge has recorded categorical finding that despite the application filed by writ petitioner-respondent No.6-Smt. Ranjit Kaur, she was not considered for appointment to the post of Anganwari Workers in the wake of new policy issued vide letter dated 20.08.2004. The learned Single Judge has gone to the extent of getting her application alongwith documents examined from the Forensic Science Laboratory, Chandigarh and thereafter has issued elaborate directions in para 12. 2. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant, we are of the LPA No. 371 of 2011(O&M) -2- considered view that no interference in the judgment of the learned Single Judge would be warranted. There is no error of jurisdiction or error of law to interfere in the view taken by the learned Single Judge. 3. The appeal is without merit and the same is dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (T.P.S. MANN) JUDGE March 1, 2011 Atul