1 ndm 22 crast.31941.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION (stamp) NO. 31941 OF 2010 IN MISC. APPLICATION NO. 747 OF 2010 IN APPEAL (S) NO. 5087 OF 2010 IN MISC. NOTICE NO. 909 OF 1983 IN L.E. SUIT NO. 291 / 338 OF 1983 Mridangraj Hiralal Suchak alias Barfiwalla vs. Bank of Baroda Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. Rohit Kapadia, Senior Counsel, i/b Ajit Shukla i/b Mr. Ashok G. Toraskar for the Applicant. Mr. A.R.Bamne for the Respondent. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 15 th December, 2010. P.C. 1 Not on board. Taken on board. 2 On the prayer made by the learned senior counsel appearing for the Applicant, permission is granted to convert this revision application into a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today. 2 3 The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent pointed out that though the impugned order dated 10 th December, 2010 records that application at Exhibit – 7 is allowed, in fact, the impugned order is an ad-interim order, which will operate only till the appeal is heard for admission. 4 In view of this statement, it is clarified that the impugned order shall be treated as ad-interim order, which will operate only till the appeal is heard for admission. It is obvious that the Petitioner will be heard by the Appeal Bench before finally deciding the prayer for stay. Subject to what is observed above, petition is disposed of. [ A.S.OKA, J ]