f #r‘ o BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CmTTISGARH AT BILASPUR VLP. mo. Eé/ 2004 \ ‘ ‘ § ‘ 1 : \ ~ 1 ‘ . PETITIONER i y’KeShav Ram Nishad ; § S/o Late Makhanlal Nishad P.o. Dewker. Tab : Saja/ Dist : Durg (c.G.). VERSUS / Z t i I I V » xgSPoiiIDENTs i t ‘: y] 1. Stété Efléhhattiégar'h ‘ Through : Secretary, Depargnent of Eaucation, 9.K.s’. / Bhawan, mantralaya, Raipur (c.G.) 2. State of Madhya Pradesh I Through : Secretary, Department wk of Education, Bhopal ( ILP ). 3. Union of India}, Dehhi. 4. collector. Durg. /5 Distnct Educatlon oft’icer, Durg. } /€ Princ1pal Purva madhyamk shala ‘ T sahaspur, P051; Dewkar, Tahsil saJa, Dist : D5urg (c G ). I i gi} WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE OONSTI'I‘UTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. 3 ‘ ( CER'I‘xoaARI AND OTHER APPRQPRIATE WRITsgognERs/DIRECTIONS ‘ f § r 5 / w . HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON’BLE SHRI SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. WRIT PETITION NO.4836 OF 2004 P€1itione Keshav Ram Nishad r VEI‘SHS Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and others Present : Ms. Sudha Agrawal, counsel for the petitioner. \‘ Mr. V.V.S.Murthy, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No.1, 4, 5 and 6. ‘ None appears for respondents No.2 and 3. ORAL ORDER (21* April, 2006) The petitionex’s father Shri Makhanlal Nishad died on 23~2- 1998 in harness while working as Assistant Teacher in Purva Madhyamik School, at Sahaspur, P.O. Dewkar, Tahsil Saja, District Durg (Chhattisgarh). The case of the petitioner for compassionate appointment was duly forwarded by the concerned District Education O$ce1z However, the petitioner has not been given compassionate appointment till date. 2. The Government of Chhattisgarh, by its circular dated 2- 2—2006, has directed all the departments to consider cases of all the eligible dependant—legal heir of the employees, who died in harness between 1- 1 1- 1997 to 31~ 10-2000 for compassionate appointment. 3. to consider the case of the petitioner as per its own circular dated 2- Accordingly, the Government of Chhatn'sgarh is directed 2—2006 and also in View of the order dated 20~ 12—2005 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 1322/ 2002 and other connected matters on its own merit, in accordance with law, on such representation being med by the peu'tioner. 4. For the reasons stated above, the writ petition stands disposed of. No oxder as to costs. Ceriincd copy as per xules.