HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2505 of 2011 Date : 15.02.2011 Between : Mohd.Maqbool. …..Petitioner And The Government of A.P., Home Department, rep. by its Principal Secretary & others. .....Respondents HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2505 of 2011 ORDER : This writ petition is filed, seeking directions by way of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondent No.5 in not receiving and not taking any action on his representation, dated 3rd February 2011, and further insisting the petitioner to settle the issue with respondents 6 and 7, as illegal. It is the case of the petitioner that he is the owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac.0-13.11 guntas in Sy.No.139, situated at Katedahan village of Rajendranagar Municipality in Ranga Reddy District, which was purchased by his father by way of a registered sale deed, in the year 1999. It is the grievance of the petitioner that respondents 6 and 7 are threatening to take possession of the aforesaid land, and are trying to extract an amount of Rs.40 lakhs from him. It is submitted that inspite of his moving the 5th respondent by way of a representation, dated 3rd February 2011, indicating the above said facts, no action has been taken. Hence, the present writ petition. The matter was adjourned on last occasion to enable the learned Government Pleader to obtain instructions. On instructions, it is submitted by the learned Government pleader that there was another representation filed by the petitioner on 8th February 2011, based on which, a case is registered in Crime No.128 of 2011 on the file of the 5th respondent for the offences under Sections 387 and 506 of IPC and investigation is in progress. As much as the crime is already registered, no further direction need be given on the plea of the petitioner that his representation was not looked into. In view of registration of crime on the complaint of the petitioner, made on 8th February 2011 in Crime No.128 of 2011, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing respondents 4 and 5 to see that the investigation is completed as expeditiously as possible, and the 4th respondent-Assistant Commissioner of Police is further directed to monitor the investigation till appropriate final report is filed. Subject to above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 15th February 2011 ajr