RSA No.3498 of 2009 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.3498 of 2009 (O&M). Decided on: May 18, 2011. Jagmal etc. .. Appellants VERSUS Suraj Bhan. .. Respondent * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporter? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? * * * PRESENT Mr.Ashish Gupta, Advocate, for the appellants. M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Suit of the plaintiff-respondent for specific performance of the agreement of sale dated 23.06.1993, has been decreed by the Courts below. Counsel for the defendants-appellants, has contended that the plaintiff-respondent had not been ready and . . . 1 RSA No.3498 of 2009 (O&M) willing to perform his part of the contract and that on the basis of oral agreement entered into between the parties determining the value of the mineral @ ` 1,50,000/- and that said amount was to be paid to the defendants before execution of the sale deed, there was no ground to decree the suit for specific performance. I have heard the counsel for the defendants- appellants, at length, and I am of the opinion that the Courts below have arrived at a concurrent finding of fact that pursuant to the agreement of sale, the possession had been delivered to the plaintiff-respondent and that he had to pay only a sum of ` 10,500/- as balance of the sale consideration after adjusting the earnest money. No ground is made out warranting interference in the concurrent finding of fact as no substantial question is involved. Dismissed. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE May 18, 2011. rka . . . 2