IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.3704 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO.3704 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO.3704 OF 2008 Sou.Yogini Balasaheb Jadhav, .. Applicant. Vs The State of Maharashtra, .. Respondent Mr H.S.Venegavkar, for the applicant. Ms P.P.Shinde, for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 20/10/2008 DATE : 20/10/2008 DATE : 20/10/2008 PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard Mr.Venegavkar, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr.Shinde, learned APP, for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in C.R.No.68 of 2008 of Patan police station district-Satara. The said crime has been registered against the applicant for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 419,420,467,468,471 read with 34 of IPC. It is on the allegations that the present applicant got executed a sale deed on 17.3.2006 in respect of land survey no.391/2, situate at village Tarale from Sanjay Deshpande and Haribhau Deshpande though they were not the exclusive owners of the said property. it is alleged that Sanjay Deshpande had no interest at all in the suit property, still he executed the said registered sale deed posing himself to be Satish Deshpnade. Satish Deshpande has not executed any sale deed in favour of the present applicant. Learned APP submits that the custody of the present applicant is necessary to recover the original sale deed. Mr Venegaonkar, learned counsel for the applicant, submits that the applicant is prepared to produce original sale deed executed in her favour before the police. His statement is accepted. 3. The complainant along with three others have already filed Special Civil Suit No.59 of 2006 against the applicant and three others seeking declaration that the sale deed executed in favour of the applicant is not binding on the complainant and others and the said suit is pending before the Civil Judge, senior Division, Karad. Keeping this all in view, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the present applicant. Hence, the following order: . In the event of arrest, the applicant to be enlarged on bail in the sum of Rs.15,000/-, with one or two sureties to make up the said amount, subject to condition that the applicant shall report to the concerned police station every alternate day between 10 am and 11 am till 07.11.2008,except between 27th and 31.10.08, for interrogation and thereafter on every alternate Saturday for a period of 90 days from the date of her formal arrest or till the chargesheet is filed, whichever is earlier. . While passing this order I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case without being influenced by the observations made in this order. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)