IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 2845 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 2845 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 2845 OF 2007 Jagdish Electrobic (I) P.Ltd..... Petitioner versus Maharashtra Labour Union & ors...... Respondent. Shri K.M.Naik with S.P.Salkar for the petitioner CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 23RD APRIL, 2007 DATED; 23RD APRIL, 2007 DATED; 23RD APRIL, 2007 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. Part-1 award passed by the labour court is challenged by filing the present writ petition. The labour court has found that an exparte decision has been reached by the enquiry officer. Noticing that the workmen were not present when the witness for employer was examined, the labour court has held that after examintaiton of the witness of the employer the matter ought to have been adjourned to enable the workmen to cross examine the management’s witness and to lead evidence on their behalf. After finding that the enquiry was not just and fair it has proceeded to declare that the enquiry stands visiated in relation to some of the workmen whose case is covered by the present writ petition. 2. Perused the order passed by the labour court. No interfernce is called for as the labour court has not committed any illegality much less patent. In the result, the writ petition is summarily dismissed. ....