IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. (SS) 1282 of 2011 Amar Singh …Petitioner Versus Gurukul Kangri Vishwavidyalaya, Haridwar Uttarakhand and another ….Respondents Present : Mr. Siddhasrth Sah, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Arvind Vashisht, Advocate present for respondents. Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) Heard Mr. Siddharth Sah, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sanjeev Singh, for the petitioner and Mr. Arvind Vashisth, Advocate present for respondents. The petitioner is an employee of “Gurukul Kangari Vidyalaya” which the petitioner alleges, is under the “Gurukul Kangari Vishwavidyalaya”. The petitioner has been suspended vide order 16.8.2011. Impugned order has been perused. It is a telegraphic order suspending the petitioner for remaining absent without information. It does not assign that the suspension is in contemplation of inquiry or during the pendency of disciplinary proceedings. The impugned order dated 16.8.2011 appears to be arbitrary. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has stated that writ petition be disposed of at this stage itself with a liberty to the respondents to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law. The writ petition therefore succeeds, order dated 16.8.2011 is hereby quashed, though liberty is given to the respondents to pass fresh orders in accordance with law. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 23.9.2011 Kuldeep