IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 86 of 2006 Anil Kumar Chabra and four others ……… Petitioners Versus Public Service Commission, State of Uttaranchal, Ayog Bhawan, Gurukul Kangri, Kankhal, District-Haridwar. ……… Respondent Coram:- Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Present: Mr. Rajesh Pandey Advocate for Mr.Vijay Bhatt Advocate for the petitioners. Date of Decision: 15.02.2010 J.S. Khehar, C.J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners states, that the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous and as such the same may be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the instant writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (Sudhanshu Dhulia,J.) ( J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 15.02.2010 P. Singh