1 CA-4140.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4140 OF 2010 Sham Suresh Rajput .... Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Ms Anjali Avasthi for the Applicant. Ms P.P. Shinde, APP, for the State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: OCTOBER 26, 2010 P.C: 1. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail. With the help of the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP, I have tried to figure out as to what is it that the police hold out against the applicant, but could not gather anything to show as to how the police propose to prove the charges against the applicant. The learned Addl. Sessions Judge unfortunately rejected the applicant's prayer for bail on the ground that the applicant had possibly given some forged documents while seeking bail in another offence. That could not have been a consideration in deciding the applicant's entitlement to bail in the present 2 CA-4140.10 case. 2. The learned APP submits that the applicant is from Punjab which statement is contested by the learned counsel for the applicant by stating that the applicant is very much from Maharashtra. 3. In view of the above, the application is allowed. The applicant be released on bail in case No.S.C. No.46/08 on 26/04/2010 on his furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the sum aggregating toRs.25,000/- on the condition that the applicant will attend the police station concerned on the first and third Sundays of every month in between 10:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. till the trial is over. The application accordingly stands disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)