IN TIlE HIGH COURT OF KkRNATAI4\ CIR(’t iT L3KNC’Il AT I)! I\RWM) DATED ThIS TIlE 18 DAY OF JULY 2011 BEFORE TMIt HON’BLL MR..JUSTICE 13.\ .PINTO CRIMINAL PETITION No.] O3’ 12O 1 BETWEEN: Prakash Kadappa I Iegannaan Age: Major. 0cc’: Business. R/o. Opp: Ajari Hospital. Bus Stand Road. Gokak. District: Bekauni. . . .Petitioner (By Shri Arun L. Neclopant. Advocate) AND: Vishal Shrinias Malpun. Age: Major. 0cc: Business. R/o. Raviwar Peth. (Jokak. District: Belgaum. .. .Respondent (By Shn M.J.Peerjade. Advocate) This criminal petnic’n is filed under Section 482 ot the Code of Criminal Pt ocedure seeking to quash the order dated 05.Un.2007 passed b3 the Civil Judge (Junior E)isisun) anti .J.M.F.C.. Gukak iii C.C’ No Cn$ 2007 us against the petitioner as per Annexure A and issue directions to the Court below to drop the entire proceedings as aaunst the present petition. This criminal petition is coming on for admission, this day the Court made the following: ORDER Heard. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition to quash the proceedings on the ground that in the sworn statement of the respondent - complainant, he has not stated that there is any document supporting the cheque. This ground has to be urged. at the time of the trail Court not in a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petition is dismissed. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the complainant has not filed list of witnesses. The petitioner is at liberty to approach this Court, if he is aggrieved by the proposal of the complainant to examine any other witnesses as the matter is posted for cross examination of P.W. I. Hence. the petition is pre-mature and therefore it is dismissed. Sd! JUDGE Rsh