IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 22.10.2008 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.RAJESWARAN Writ Petition No.25305 Of 2008 A.R.Shridharan ...Petitioner ..Vs.. 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by the Special Commissioner & Commissioner for Revenue Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. 2. The Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Fort St. George, Madras-600 009. 3. The District Collector, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram. 4. The District Revenue Officer, Kancheepuram. 5. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chengalpattu. ...Respondents Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 29.01.2007. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Bhiman For Respondents : M/s.Lita Srinivasan Government Advocate ORDER The writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for directing the respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 29.01.2007. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. Mrs.Lita Srinivasan, the learned Government Advocate takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. The case of the petitioner is that he was working as a Village Administrative Officer and he was placed under suspension by the Sub Collector, Chengalpattu on 09.09.1998. Thereafter, on the basis of the order passed by Tamil Nadu State Administrative Tribunal, Madras, the 5th respondent passed an order of reinstatement and on and from 05.01.2004, he has been working as Village Administrative Officer, Periyakatupakkam village, Thirukalukundram Taluk. However, the period of suspension from 10.09.1988 to 04.01.2004 has not been regularised till date. The petitioner sent a detailed representation to the first respondent marking copies of the same to the other respondents on 29.01.2007 and his representation has not been disposed of till date. Hence, he has filed the above writ petition for the aforesaid relief. 4. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents and I have also gone through the documents filed in support of their submissions. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the third respondent is directed to consider the representation made by the writ petitioner on 29.01.2007 on merits and in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, as the representation was submitted in January, 2007 (i.e.) 10 months ago, the petitioner herein is directed to submit a copy of the representation along with a copy of this order for the consideration of the third respondent to pass orders in the above terms. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar rrg To 1. The Special Commissioner & Commissioner for Revenue Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. The Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Fort St. George, Madras-600 009. 3. The District Collector, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram. 4. The District Revenue Officer, Kancheepuram. 5. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chengalpattu. + 1 c.c. to Mr. V. Bhiman, Advocate. S.R.No.58912. + 1 c.c. to The Government Pleader. S.R.No.58962. W.P.No.25305 of 2008 RSM (CO) GSK 29.10.2008. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/