BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Fourth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15341 of 2011 1 KALIDOSS S/O. GANESAN, 2 MURUGANANDAM 3 KALIDOSS S/O. RENGASAMY, ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PAPPANADU POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT, CRIME NO.202/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. G.KARNAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Addl.Public Prosecutor(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are arrayed as accused and they were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 23.10.2011 for the alleged commission of offences under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 427, 324 and 307 I.P.C., in Crime No.202 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek bail. 2.Heard Mr.G.Karnan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Durai Pandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal side) appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for bail. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) would submit in his argument that the investigation is still pending and if for any reason, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners there should be a stringent condition for the accused persons. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Considering the submission made on both sides, I could see that the petitioners are undergoing incarceration right from 23.10.2011 and the injured person had already been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail on the following conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsif-cum- Judicial Magistrate, Orathanadu and on further condition that the petitioners Should stay at Thirupur and should appear before the Thirupur Town Police Station, daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders. Sd/- 24/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ORATHANADU, THANJAVUR 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PAPPANADU POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT 3 THE INSEPCTOR OF POLICE, THIRUPUR TOWN POLICE STATION, THIRUPUR 4 THE SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL PRISON, TRICHY 5 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. G.KARNAN Advocate SR.No.41203 ssk/24.11.2011 /7c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15341 of 2011 Date :24/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/