SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3645 OF 2010 Shri Bramhanand R. Pandey ...Petitioner. v/s. Raj Oil Mills Ltd. & Anr. ...Respondents. Mr. Vijay Gharat ,adv. For the Petitioner. Mr. S.V.Marwadi, adv. For the Respondent No.1. Smt. M.R.Tidke, APP for the R.No.2. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : MAY 5, 2011. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner-Bramhanand Pandey, who seeks to quash a process issued by the learned J.M.F.C. Palghar in criminal case no.1736 of 2010 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. In the complaint, accused is shown as Dayalu Enterprise, a proprietary concern owned by Bramhanand Pandey. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner Bramhanand Pandey is not proprietor of Dayalu Enterprise. On further query by the Court, he stated that actually his son is proprietor of Dayalu Enterprise. I have gone through the complaint. In the complaint, it is not specifically stated that Bramhanand Pandey has signed the cheque. Anyhow, petitioner can approach the trial Court and point out this fact and the complainant may also take appropriate steps. – 2 - 2 Petition stands disposed off with the above observations. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)