IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR THURSDAY, THE 23RD DECEMBER 2010 / 2ND POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 25981 of 2010(Q) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- FATHER THOMAS FELIX, CMI, CENTRAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL RETARDATION, JEEVAN PRAKASH, MURINJAPALAM, MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SMT.S.KARTHIKA SRI.M.S.UNNIKRISHNAN SRI.M.R.ANISON SMT.K.P.GEETHA MANI SRI.P.N.APPUKUTTAN SMT.P.A.RINUSA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MEDICAL COLLEGE POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. ASST. COMMISSIONER, NARCOTIC CELL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. K.C.JACOB, RESMI NIVAS, MAMBALLI KUNNU, CHATHANOOR P.O., KOLLAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SABU SREEDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Learned Government Pleader submitted that refer report has been filed in Ext.P4 FIR. In view of the submission petition is disposed. Sd/- M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J. --------------------------------------------- W.P.C.NO.25981 OF 201 --------------------------------------------- Dated 21st December, 2010 JUDGMENT Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for a writ of mandamus directing respondent to forward the report to the Government and obtain necessary sanction to submit charge sheets in Vigilance cases VC 3/2008, VC 7/2008, VC 8/2008 and VC 1/2009 of VACB, Palakkad as expeditiously as possible within a period to be fixed by the Court contending that, final report is not being submitted, even though the case is being investigated from 2007 onwards. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Bureau, Central Range, Ernakulam filed a detailed WPC 25981/10 2 statement showing the progress of the investigation. Petitioner thereafter filed a reply affidavit wherein, considering the statement filed by the investigating officer, a direction is sought to complete the investigation within a time frame. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Additional Director General of Prosecution were heard. 4. In the light of the details of investigation stated in the statement submitted by the Superintendent of Police VACB, Central Range, Excise, Ernakulam, I do not think that any direction is warranted, except providing that investigation is to be exhaustive and shall be completed expeditiously. M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE. uj.