IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1368 of 2009 SHAILENDRA KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 6 11.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. In course of submission, the period of sentence pressed by referring that the petitioner remained in jail custody since 17.8.2009. All the family members were made accused in the case but this petitioner and his father were convicted and in appeal his father was also acquitted vide Cr.Appeal No. 41/99. The case was filed in the year 1996, petitioner faced trial for several years including pendency of the appeal. Thereafter in revision in which the petitioner is only in custody since 17.8.2009, the period undergone by him can be observed sufficient towards sentence. I agree with the submission. This revision application is partly allowed on the point of sentence that period undergone by the petitioner is sufficient towards his sentence otherwise both orders dated 20.7.2009 passed in Cr.Appeal No. 41/99 2 by Sri Bipin Bihari Lal, Additional Sessions Judge-II, Nawada affirming the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 16.7.1999 passed in G.R.No. 450/96/T.R.No. 237/99 are confirmed. Let the above named petitioner be released from custody forthwith in the aforesaid case, if not required in any other case. Let this order be communicated through fax at the cost of the petitioner. A.I (Mandhata Singh, J.)