ssp 1 WP 719 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.719 OF 2011 M/s.Edenred (India) Pvt. Ltd. .....Petitioner versus Life Insurance Corporation of India and Ors. ..... Respondents Mr.Ravi Kadam, Advocate General with Mr.Kedar Patil, for the petitioner. Mr.J.J.Bhatt, Senior Advocate with Dr.Poornima Advani, Mr.Himanshu Kode, Mr.Omprakash Jha i/by The Law Point, for respondent No.1. Mr.P.N.Mody i/by Ms.Diana Postavala, for respondent No.2. CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE: 13 th JULY, 2011 P.C. 1. Since the contract given to respondent No.2 is going to be over by 31-08-2011, learned counsel for respondent No.1 states that at present, petitioner and respondent No.2 are the only eligible parties for participating in the contract in question which is to be awarded for the next year. He states that petitioner and respondent No.2 both will be given bids in a sealed cover and at the time of opening of the seal cover, both the parties will be kept present and appropriate decision for awarding contract will be taken. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner at present, may not press this petition in view of the aforesaid liberty, but ssp 2 WP 719 of 2011 reserving its right to challenge fresh decision in accordance with law, if so required, including imposition of any condition in the fresh bid. The said aspect is kept open. Subject to the said liberty, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. ( MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )