IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.44346 of 2008 1. Chandan Singh, son of Chharpan Singh 2. Sari Lal Singh, son of Chharpan Singh 3. Sampat Lal Singh, son of Jharoo Singh All residents of village Sikty, P.S. Sikty, district Araria 4. Dinesh Pd. Singh, son of Chamru Singh, resident of village Balua Kaliaganj, P.S. Palasi, district Araria .. Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar .. Opposite Party **** /2/ 20.01.2009 Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Allegation in the complaint petition is that the complainant was duped by the accused persons, Chandan Singh and Sari Lal Singh. They took her thumb impression on this plea that she will be granted benefits of Indira Awas Yojna. Later on the document, on which thumb impression was taken, was converted into the sale deed. Counsel for the petitioner submits that false case has been instituted. Complainant has received entire consideration money. The allegation is civil in nature. Instead of filing complaint case, the complainant could have filed suit for declaring the sale 2 deed as forged document. For some other dispute present case has been instituted. 3. Considering the facts, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioners, Chandan Singh, Sari Lal Singh, Sampat Lal Singh and Dinesh Pd. Singh, is allowed. They are directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in case of their surrender before the Court concerned within four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Case No. 2108 C of 2005 to the satisfaction of Shri S.N. Jha, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Araria, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. S.A. ( Mridula Mishra, J. )