..-'•' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATOISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 2317 of 2002 Petitioners 1. Sunher, son of Gaagaram Dheiuar, ^ed about 63 yeais. 2. Ueociiaraalal, son of Sonsai Dhemar, aged about49 yeare, Both are residents of VUlage- Bhojpur, Tehsfl - Cbainpa, District - Jaajgir Chaaipa (CG) Versus Respondente 1. > State of CIihattisgarti, th.rough Coltector, Jaitjgu- Chainpa (CG) 2. Najto Tehsildar, Chaiapa, District- Janjgir ChaiBpa(CG^). 3. DashodaBai,widowofDasIuathDheemar. 4. Piim Ram son of Dashrath Dheemar. 5. Itwaia Bai, dai^hter of Daslira.th Dheetnar. Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 sacs residents of village Bhojpur, Tehsil - Champa, District- Jaajgir Cbaiapa (CG). WRITPETITQNUNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OPTHB CONSTITUTION OPINDIA (SB: HonTile Shri Satish K. AgnihotriJ.) Shri SiuuISahu, Advocate for tfae petitioners. Shri VivekShanna, Panel Lawyer for the respondents No.l & 2, ORDER (Passed on this 8th Day of September, 2008) 1. Learaed counsel appearing for the petitioners subimts that fhe identical proceediags are pendiag cousideration before the Civil Coiirt as well as Revenue .pourt. The petittoners have approached the Reveaue Court to stay ttie proceedmgs in view of fhe pendency of the matter before the Civil Court. The Revenue Coiirt has declined to grant relief. '[• .' -^ m 2. ThakuT Be fhat as it uiay, if tfae case is pencLmg consideiation belbre the CivU. Court, it has power to stay the proceedings of the smular nature, pending before the Revenue Court. In view of the above, leamcd coiuisel appearing for the petitioner subxnits that the petitioner naay be permitted to withdraw this petition with Uberty to approach fhe Civil Court. In view of ftie above, Ihe petition is disintesed as withdrawn, with the above-stated liberty. Consequently, M(W)P No. 1369/2002 foriateriai reUefalso staads disinissed. i Sdl- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge •-"I