IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 24593 of 2004 Between: Mir Ahmed Ali Khan, S/o Mohammed Ali Khan, Chandrayanagutta, Narquipool Bagh, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Collector record survey settlements, Ranga Reddy District Lakadikapool, Hyderabad. 2 The Assistant Director, Survery Settlements, R.R.district at Lakadikapool, Hyderabad 3 The Mandal Surveyor, Saroornagar Mandal, at M.R.O. Office, Saroornagar, R.R.District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus while declaring inaction of respondents not completing the demarcation of boundaries survey in the land admeasuring 0-33 gts in Sy.no.132/2 Gaddi Annaram V of Sarrornagar Mandal, R.R,.District pursuant to intimation notices dt. 01-10-2004 as illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory besides violative of fundamental rights and principles of natural justice, direct the respondents to continue/complete the demarcation of survey by installing the stones on boundaries in the light of survey of second respondent dt.30-10-2001. For the Petitioner: MR. M. PRAVEEN KUMAR, Advocate. For the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court at the stage of admission made the following : ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue and with their consent the writ petition itself is disposed of at the stage of admission. The petitioner states that in pursuance of the order of this Court dated 18-09- 2001, made in W.P. No.19325 of 2001 filed by him, the second respondent conducted survey demarcation of boundaries in respect of his land admeasuring Ac.0-33 guntas situated in Survey No.132/2 of Gaddi Annaram V, Saroornagar Mandal of R.R. District, on 30-10-2001, without fixing the boundary stones. His grievance is that though he made applications twice with requisite fee to the Mandal Revenue Officer, Saroornagar Mandal for fixation of boundary stones in his land by the third respondent-Mandal Surveyor, as per the survey demarcation conducted by the second respondent, the survey stones have not been fixed up so far. Hence, the writ petition. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to direct the respondents to complete the work relating to fixation of survey stones in the land as prayed for by the petitioner, expeditiously, if not already done. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. No costs. ______________ N.V. RAMANA, J Date: 29-12-2004 Svv To 1 The Collector record survey settlements, Ranga Reddy District Lakadikapool, Hyderabad. 2 The Assistant Director, Survery Settlements, R.R.district at Lakadikapool, Hyderabad 3 The Mandal Surveyor, Saroornagar Mandal, at M.R.O. Office, Saroornagar, R.R.District. 4 Two CCs. to the Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court Buildings, A.P., Hyderabad (OUT). 5 Two CD copies.