... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3341 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.3341 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.3341 OF 2005 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.2890 OF 2003 PETITION NO.2890 OF 2003 PETITION NO.2890 OF 2003 .................................................................. Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders. orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. .................................................................. Shri Machindra A. Patil for the Applicants. Shri Tushar Goradia & S.P.Munek for the Respondent Nos.2(1) and 2(2). CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : JUNE 04, 2007. : JUNE 04, 2007. : JUNE 04, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocates appearing for the parties. Application is strongly opposed by the learned Advocate appearing for the proposed legal representatives by pointing out material averments in the Civil Application. 2. Though the Application for bringing on record legal representatives of the deceased Respondent No.2 deserves to be allowed, the Applicants will have to pay costs to the proposed legal representatives. Accordingly, Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (c) subject to condition of the Applicants paying costs of Rs.2,000/- to the proposed legal representatives of the deceased Respondent No.2. Amount to be paid within six weeks. Payment of costs will be condition precedent. ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE