WP(C) 5061/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE IA ANSARI The petitioner, who claims to be one of the Assistant Teachers of Tamuli top ME Madrassa, Nagaon, has filed this writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of appropriate directions to be issued t o the respondents, his case being, in brief, that though he had been working in the said school since its inception and various inspections, which had been carr ied out in the past, reflected his name as an Assistant Teacher of the said scho ol, respondent No. 4, namely, Headmaster of the said school has been trying to a ppoint his wife (i.e., respondent No. 6, namely, Mustt. Sobnam Mustafi), in plac e of the petitioner and take the benefit of withdrawing financial assistance, in her favour, which has been made available by the State Government to the said s chool. Heard Mr. NI Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. MR Pathak, learne d Standing Counsel, Education Department, appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3. Considering the matter in its entirety and in the interest of justice, t his writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent No. 2, namely, Director of Elementary Education, Government of Assam, Guwahati, to examine the grievances of the petitioner, determine the facts and pass appropriate order(s) in accordance with law. The whole exercise, so directed, shall be completed wit hin a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by th e respondent No. 2, namely, Director of Elementary Education, Government of Assa m, Guwahati. The petitioner may furnish to the respondent No. 2, namely, Directo r of Elementary Education, Government of Assam, Guwahati, a certified copy of th is order along with copy of the writ petition and annexure thereto. Whatever dec ision is taken by the respondent/authorities concerned, the same shall be commun icated, in writing, to the petitioner and, if the petitioner feels aggrieved by the decision(s), which may be reached by the respondents, the petitioner shall r emain at liberty to take recourse to appropriate provisions of law. For the purpose of disposing of the petitioner’s grievances and taking of decisi on in the matter, respondent No. 2 shall accord opportunity of hearing not only to the petitioner, but also to the respondent Nos. 4, 5 and 6, namely, Headmaste r, Tamulitop ME Madrassa, Managing Committee, Tamulitop ME Madrassa and Mustt. S obnam Mustafi, respectively. Furnish a copy of this order to the learned Standing Counsel, Education Departme nt.