IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43416 of 2009 GOSAI YADAV , son of Dorik Yadav, resident of vill.-Partaha, P.S.- Nauhatta, Distt.-Saharsa ----------------Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------------- 2. 21.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that land dispute is there in between the parties and only to make pressure allegation has been leveled against the accused persons to abuse in name of informant’s caste. His further submission is that after investigation no liability was found by the investigating officer. So chargesheet was submitted exonerating the petitioner, even then cognizance is taken. Allegation of offence under SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act if is made out then only vague without specifying any one not sufficient for the accusation under section 3(1)(X) of the SC and ST( Prevention of Atrocities) Act against this petitioner. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case petitioner’s prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of communication of this order the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.P. Anand, Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in connection with Nauhatta P.S. case no.78 of 2006 , subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )