1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR LPA NO. 422 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2571 OF 2009 (M/s. Saba Sona Corporation & Anr. vs. Mahasinbhai Mazhar Hussain & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & F.M. REIS, JJ. SEPTEMBER 23, 2009. Heard Shri Srivastava, learned counsel for the appellants – tenants. The bonafide need given by landlord was possible eviction from tenanted premises. The business in tenanted premises of one Zubedabi was being run by landlord along with his brother. The contention of Shri Srivastava, learned counsel is that Zubedabi has later on sold the suit premises to landlord but sale deed has been obtained in the name of nephew only to frustrate the claim of present appellants. The issue has been considered by the authorities below and by obtaining sale deed it cannot be said that need of the uncle – landlord is in any way extinguished. The other contention is that the landlord had never given notice before demanding the rent regularly to the appellants. The case of the appellants was that rent was payable as and when demanded. The finding 2 in this respect is already recorded concurrently against the appellants. We are, therefore, not inclined to interfere in the present Letters Patent Appeal. The same is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.