IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.323 OF 2006 AND CONTEMPT PETITION NO.324 OF 2006 Mr.Shrikant Shankarrao Birji ...Petitioner Versus Shri Bahuballi Zilha Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit & Anr. ...Respondents ...... Mr.R.S.Ghadge i/b Mr.A.S.Desai for Petitioner. Mr.U.P.Warunjikar for Respondent No.1. Mr.P.S.Cardezo, A.G.P. for Respondent No.2. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. JANUARY 11, 2007. JANUARY 11, 2007. JANUARY 11, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. As the proceedings have now been finally disposed of by the Registrar, the fact that there was delay in disposal of the Application, does not persuade me to exercise contempt jurisdiction. 2. If the Petitioner is aggrieved by the : 2 : order passed by the Registrar, it is open to the Petitioner to question the correctness thereof before appropriate forum, which proceedings will be considered on its own merits in accordance with law. These Petitions are disposed of. Notices issued to the Respondents/Contemnors stand discharged. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.