1 wp2187.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2187 OF 2010 Vinod Kalyanji Bhagat ...Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Sushan Kunjuraman for Petitioner. Dr.F.R.Shaikh, A.P.P. for Respondent State. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND U.D.SALVI, JJ. DATED:- SEPTEMBER 24, 2010. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned A.P.P. 2. Perused reply affidavit. In our opinion, no interference is warranted in exercise of writ jurisdiction. For, the issues raised by the Petitioner are trivial in nature and cannot be the basis to transfer investigation. The incident in question has been recorded in the FIR. It is not the case of the Petitioner that the same has been incorrectly recorded. The investigation is proceeding on t he basis of the said FIR. Hence, this Petition is dismissed. (U.D.SALVI, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)