HIGH COURTOF CHHATT1S6ARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH Coram : Hon'bte Shri H. L. Dattu, CJ. and Hon'bte Shri Dillp Raosaheb Deshmuldi, J. MA.(C»No.497of20U7 Appeltant Devki Bai Wictow of Late Shri Tularam Claimant Yadav, aged about 58 years (wrongly mentioned as 50 years in the impugned award) resident of viltage Patekohra, Tahsil Chhuriya, District Rajnandgaon Resoondents yersys Bahsant son of Shri Dayal Singh @ Daya Singh, aged about not known, resident of Ramnagar Indore, Dlsb'ict Indore (M.P.) The New India Insurance Company Limited, registered and Head OfRce, New India Insurance Company Limited, 87, Mahatma Gandhi Marg Court Mumbai - 400 001, Divisional Office through Diviaonal Manager, Power House Bhitai District Durg (C.G.) ApDealunderSection 173(2^oftheiyiotorVehicteAct. 1988 Present: Shri Abhishek Sharma, counsel for the appellant. ORALORDER (Passed on 30"* April, 2007) The following orat order of the Court was passed by Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, <j.: Heard. 2. This appeal is directed against the award dated 08.08.2006 passed by the 1^ Additional Motor Accidents Ctaims Tribunal, Rajnandgaon (hereinafter referred to as the M.A.C.T.) in claim case No. 38 of 2004 whereby in case of accidental death of Harau Singh HB''.tB"!ll.lli:fe.~*AK3...i:::.. Hiran Singh @ Chhoturam Yadav on 11.4.20)3, compensation of Rs.1,32,500/- has been awarded under the fotlowing heads: a) Lossofdependency : Rs.1,28,00)/- b) Funeral expenses : Rs. 2,000/- c) LossofEstate : Rs. 2,500/- 3. Leamed counsel for the appellant did not question the compensation awarded by the M.A.C.T. under the above mentioned heads but only urged that the M.A.C.T. ought to have also awarded some compensation under the head of loss of tove and affection to the mother of the deceased. No other point was urged. 4. Having heard the teamed counsel for the appellant, we have perused the impugned award. The mother of the deceased had filed an application under Section 163-A ofthe Motor Vehicles Actfor award of compensation on struchired formula basis. Under the struchired formula provided in the second schedule under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, compensation is to be awarded only, as indicated in the second schedule, which does not contain the head of loss of love and affection. We, therefore, find no merit in this appeal which is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- chief Justice Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge