1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 4443/2009 Madan Lal Vs. The Superintending Engineer & ors. Date of Order :: 15th September 2009. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI None present for the petitioner Mr.S.S.Bishnoi for the respondent No.3 .... BY THE COURT: This matter came up for consideration on 04.09.2009 but nobody appeared for either of the parties. After examining the entire record, the matter was placed for dictation of order today. Today also, nobody is present for the petitioner. Learned counsel Mr.S.S.Bishnoi has appeared for the respondent No.3. For continuous defaults on the part of the petitioner in attending, it appears that the petitioner has already lost interest in prosecuting this writ petition. This petition was filed on 29.04.2009 seeking to question the order dated 24.02.2009 as passed by the Superintending Engineer, Water Resources Circle, Srivijaynagar in Appeal No.14/2009. The petitioner has raised objection against allowing of irrigation water facility to the 2 respondent No.3 from the outlet of Chak 10 DOL after transferring from Chak 8 DOL. The authorities concerned have taken into consideration the interest of irrigation and it has also been pointed out that despite issuance of notice and adjourning the matter several times by the Executive Engineer, nobody came forward from Chak 10 DOL to raise objection in the matter. The learned Superintending Engineer has found the order as passed by the Executive Engineer justified in the interest of irrigation. The findings remain essentially on facts and are based on consideration of the situation at site. There appears no jurisdictional error leading to failure of justice so as to consider interference in the writ jurisdiction. The writ petition stands rejected. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. MK