IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.396 of 2011 RAM NARESH PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 04.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Koilwar P.S. Case No. 168 of 2010 registered under section-414 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, some mobile sets and digital cameras were recovered from possession of the petitioner and he could not succeed to produce any paper in respect of seized mobiles and cameras. The contention of Learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is a mechanic and as a matter of fact, customers had given the aforesaid mobiles and cameras to him. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the investigation has already been completed but the police could not succeed to bring this fact on record that the aforesaid seized articles are stolen one. Considering the aforesaid facts as well as submissions of the parties, the petitioner, namely, Ram Naresh Pandey is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Koilwar P.S. Case No. 168 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Sri Anand Abhishek, J.M. Ist Class, Ara. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)