1 IN TH E H IGH COURT OF UTTARAKH AND AT NAINITAL Sta y Ap p lica tion No. 150 4 of 20 10 In W r it Petition No. 325 of 20 10 (M/ S) Sohan Singh S/ o Sri Ratan Singh, R/ o Ram Shyam Colony Gali No. 1, Ram Nagar Road, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar. ………Petitioner Versus Jagdeep Singh and others. …………Respondents. Mr. Sharad Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohd. Matloob, Advocate for the respondents. Dated : 12-04-2010 H on ’b le B.S.Ver m a ,J . Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ, order or direction to set aside the impugned 11-01-2010 annexed as annexure No. 7 to the writ petition passed by the learned Civil Judge (S.D.) Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar in Civil Case No. 55 of 2009 titled as Jagdeep Singh Vs. Sohan Singh and others alongwith the Revisional order dated 24-02-2010 annexed as annexure No. 8 to the writ petition passed by the learned District Judge, Udham Singh Nagar in Civil Revision No. 10 of 2010. By the order dated 11-01-2010 an observation was made by the trial court that the court will take decision on the application No. 41 C and objection 47C, shall be decided after framing of issues. By the order dated 24-02-2010, the revision preferred against the order dated 11-01-2010 was dismissed by the Revisional court. The application No. 41 C was made by the petitioner in which prayer was made that the plaintiffs/ respondents be directed to file original power of attorney. 2 Learned counsel for the respondent has stated at bar that in compliance of this Hon’ble Court’s order dated 16-03-2010, the original power of attorney has been filed before the court concerned by the petitioner. Since the original power of attorney had already been filed, the application 41 c stands disposed of. In view of the above facts, since the power of attorney has been filed before the trial court under the direction of this court. The application No. 41 C of the petitioner filed before the trial court is now become infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. All pending applications stand disposed of accordingly. (B.S. Ver m a ,J .) 12-04-2010 MK