FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4420 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1772 OF 2002 (Ramchandra Maruti Kadam & anr. V/s. Santosh Bhagoji Navgare & Ors.] _____________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Coram, appearances, Court s orders : ’ or directions and Registrar s’ : Court s or Judge s orders ’ ’ orders : _____________________________________________________________________________________ Ms.Manorama Mohanty i/by.S.K.Srivastav & Co., adv.for applicants. Mr.K.K.Jadhav, adv.for respondents. CORAM : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATED : 19TH NOVEMBER 2009. PC :- 1. Heard counsel for both sides. 2. This is a second application taken out to stop construction activity proposed by the respondents on the suit property. By prayer clause (b), the applicants also seek an interim injunction to restrain the respondents, inter- alia, from creating any further interest in the suit property. 3. The copy of the order dated 14th October, 2005 passed by this court in Writ Petition No. 764 of 2004 annexed by the applicants to the Civil Application shows that the applicants had earlier taken out a Civil Application seeking injunction against the proposed construction upon the land. That application was dismissed. The other application for interim reliefs seeking protection of the alleged possession of the applicants on the suit property, was also dismissed. The order was carried by the applicants to the Apex Court by filing Special Leave Petition, which was rejected by the Apex Court. The writ petition filed by the applicants challenging the grant of N.A. permission to the respondents came to be dismissed on 14th October, 2005. In that circumstance, the applicants cannot be allowed to have a second round of an application for interim reliefs. In the circumstances, the application is dismissed. (JUDGE)