.^^^^^ws'l-ifaw ""^^, C.?"°°'L" ..•••^y:^'v^)1 c ;< yyw...^^ tff^••"" y IN THE HON'BLE HIGH CQURZOF CJIHATTISGARH W.P.fS)No. ATBILASPUR yyy^- /2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS l] ^] ^3] ^ Ramesh Kumar Korram, S/o. Sukku Rarri, aged about 36 years, R/o. Village Sarauna, District Kanker VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through: Secretary, Agriculture Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Collector, South Bastar, Dantewada, District Dantewada (C.G.) Deputy Director, Agriculture, South Bastar, Dantewada, District Dantewada CC.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTIGLE 226 OF THE GONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WRIT PETmON (S) No. 4492 of2011 Ramesh Kumar Korram. RESPONDENTS VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. •^.^ Astiok WRIT PETI'nON UNDER ARHCLE 226 OF THE CONSTn'UIION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Ue Shri Satish K. Asnlhotri. J. Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. OKUER(ORAL) (Passed on 10th day ofAugust, 2011) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner subnrits that vide order dated 15.07.2010 (Anaexure P/l), the petitioner, warking as Rural AgricuUure Extension Officer at Katekalyan, District Dantewada, has been transferred to Block Narharpiir, District Kanker, on his own expenses. However, the petitioner has not yet been relieved to join the new plaee of posting. Shri Paranjpe subnaits that once fhe order oftransfer has beea passed, it is for the ;ovemment to ensure fhat it is complied with immediately. He relies on a decision of the Supreme Court in Sreedam Chandra Ghosh v. State ofAssam & others^, m support of his contention fhat if'ttie order is not complied with, a direction can be issued for enfbrcement thereof. Shri Bhaduri, leamed Panel Lawyer appearing for the State submits that that tffhe transter order dated 15.07.2010 (Annexure P/l) is still in existence and has not been complied with, appropriate steps would be taken to comply with the order. If'the aforesaid transfer order- is still in existence, the govemment is under aa obligation to comply with the same at once. It is accordingly directed Ihat the transfer order shall be eomplied with forthwith, within a period oftwo weeks. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of. ^.isK.'Ag"ibom Sausti«'>-\iw judfee (1996) 10 SCC 567