^ <i) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPVR W.P. No. ^-~1^^ /2005 :/Subhash Chand Sahu, S/o Shri Lalman Sahu, aged about 28 years, R/o Baikunthpur, Distt. Koria (C.G.) VERSUS : >. Regional Transport Authority Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) 2, Sidheshwar Prasad Pandey, S/o Mangal Prasad Pandey, R/a Post Katghori, Distt. Koria (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 W THE CONSTITVTION OF INDTA. ^'f^^?:i^^^%;?@:^^%^w^ XI-HC-22 3:n^r^r ^TT^^TT^T 9h^i<=b?rfw <..:.-. ^ Barve 3^T ^NId^, ^xfl^^Ko, ^tdl^y ^^.:JP^:A^^ fd<?<^ 3T^T?^T^K^f^T 13-7-2005 Shri B. K. Rawat,counsel Shri Yashwant Singh Thaki( Heard both the counsel. This petition has been legality of the order passed by th^ permitto respondent No.2. This Learned counsel for the Qfficer of the S.T.A.T. has not jo| posting has already been made, b< In the circumstances, the is issued at the earli^t and the pef The petitioner in the first Jn^ Learned counsel for the Presiding Officer is posted in the and in case he files an appeal wilj arise. In view of the above application ofthe petitionerfor With the direction aforesaidl Consequently, M.O/V.)P. N<] stand dispreed of. Parties are entitled for cbl^?<n^T1 ^I^^T^fe^iRl^K ^3Tf^T31T^T f(1)rthepetitioner. (r, Govt. Advocate for the respondent No.1. fil^d directly to this Court questioning the R.T.A. dated 26-4-2005 granting regular ofder is appealable. pe|titioner submitted that so far the Presiding |ned, however, it is admitted position that (it notification has not been issued. L^w Secretary to ensure that the notification titioner to approach the S.T.A.T.. i^tance to approach the appellate Court. ibetitioner further submitted that since no t.TA.T., therefore, he has filed this petition bef^M-e the S.T.A.T., then question of limitation circlumstances, the S.T.A.T. to consider the con|donation of delay in filing the appeal. the petition stands disposed of. \>. 2295/2005 and I.A. No.5504/2005 also certi|ied copy of this order. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge (tfl^y^) ^