IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 4658 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision: 30.1.2009 Shera ....Petitioner Versus Krishan Kumar and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. Vikas Bahl, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJESH BINDAL J **** Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the decree was passed in favour of the predecessor in interest of the petitioner on 10.9.1998 granting injunction against the respondents restraining respondents/defendants from interfering in the possession of the petitioner in any manner except in due course of law. After the passing of the decree the petitioner was dis-possessed. The application was filed under Order 21 Rule 32 CPC mentioning therein a wrong date of dis-possession i.e. 15.10.1995. On that basis, the application was dismissed and the order was even upheld by the learned Court below. It is submitted that as there was an error in mentioning the date of dispossession in the application filed, the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail of any other remedy in accordance with law. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (RAJESH BINDAL) 30.1.2009 JUDGE Reema