-:- 1 -:- Writ Appeal No.313 of 2011. 21.11.2011 :- Shri Umesh Gajankush, learned counsel for the appellant. Heard on the question of admission. O R D E R THIS writ appeal is directed against the order dated 13.04.2011 passed by learned Single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No.3285 of 2011 (S). [2] Today when the matter came up for hearing, the only prayer made by learned counsel for the appellant – petitioner is to dispose of this writ appeal directing the Respondents to take appropriate decision/comply the order dated 08.10.2010 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.1250 of 2008. [3] The operative part of the said order dated 08.10.2010 reads thus :- “9. Before parting with the case, we may also notice that one of the contentions raised by learned counsel for -:- 2 -:- the petitioner to the fact that the petitioner has been subjected to double punishment because he had already undergone the punishment which was imposed before the matter was set-aside and remanded back to the disciplinary authority. Apparently, we find no material to come to the conclusion that the petitioner has been subjected to a double punishment, but to be on the safer side, we hereby observe and direct that in case, the petitioner had carried out the punishment twice, then the disciplinary authority will examine the matter and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law in this regard. Except for this, we do not find that the order of the CAT needs any modification or clarification. 10. In view of the foregoing discussion and in the facts and circumstances of the case, we find no merit and substance in the writ petition. Same is hereby dismissed subject to the observations made hereinabove with regard to alleged double punishment. There shall be no order as to costs.” [4] It is alleged by the appellant – petitioner that till date the disciplinary authority has not examined the matter and has not passed any order as directed by the Division Bench on 08.10.2010. [5] Having regard to the aforesaid limited prayer, we dispose of this writ appeal directing the Respondents to -:- 3 -:- examine the petitioner's contention in the light of the observations made by the Division Bench of this Court as extracted above and take appropriate decision in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably within three months from the date receipt of copy of this order. Petitioner to submit all relevant papers and copy of the aforesaid order of this Court along with the copy of this order before the Respondents. Cc within three days. [ Shantanu Kemkar ] [ Prakash Shrivastava ] JUDGE JUDGE (AKS)