IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Ist Bail Application No.821 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Amit Bhardwaz S/o Satyanarayan Bhardwaz R/o Mohd. Aacharyan Chhoupta Near Lal Kaun, P.S. Kankhal, District Haridwar ..….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …….Opposite party Dated: September 7, 2010 __________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No.67/2010 U/Ss 420, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC P.S. Kankhal, District Haridwar ________________________________________________________________ Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. Nagesh Agarwal, Advocate for the applicant, Mr. G.S. Sandhu, GA for the State and Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the complainant. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the dispute is purely of civil nature and no registered agreement to sell has been executed between the parties. He further submitted that, in the FIR, it is alleged that an unregistered agreement to sell was executed between the parties but the unregistered agreement to sell is not admissible as per law. It is further submitted that the co-accused Sameer alias Sonu has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 30.8.2010 and the present applicant is also entitled for bail on the basis of parity. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after going through the papers on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Amit Bhardwaz be released on bail on his executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Haridwar. The bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 7.9.2010 RG