- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.7115 OF 2004 Mr. M.L. Patil for the Petitioner. Mr.Uday Warunjikar for Respondents Nos. 1 & 2. ----------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s appearances, Court’s orders order or directions ----------------------------------------------------- ¦ ¦ ¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. ¦ DATED: 13TH APRIL,2005 P.C.: 1. It is the case of the Petitioner that the suit of the Plaintiff was not maintainable and the plaint should have been rejected. The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner is not in a position to point out to me any provision of any law which will bar the Plaintiff to institute the suit or bar the court from taking cognizance of the suit. In my opinion, the court below has rightly not entertained the application of the Petitioner. - 2 - Petition is frivolous. It is rejected. Petitioner is directed to pay costs of this petition to the Respondent, as incurred by the Respondent. ...