IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1900 OF 2006 Shri Hanumant Babu Aawad ... Petitioner. Vs. Shri Ankush Hanumant Aawad & Anr. Respondents Mr. Joshi i/b. Miss Nayana Thatte for the petitioner. Mr. Machindra A. Patil for Respondent No.1. Mr. S.V. More, APP, for State. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. DATE : 19th December, 2006. DATE : 19th December, 2006. DATE : 19th December, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned Counsel on both sides. Perused the orders passed by the learned Magistrate as also the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad Alibag. 2. The learned Additional Sessions Judge has rightly considered the evidence regarding the agricultural income. The facts revealed that the petitioner has been paying Rs.200/- per month to his second wife. He has agricultural income. He owns 130 gunthas. The land is under cultivation. Even 7 x 12 extracts are produced. Therefore, the petitioner cannot claim maintenance from his son. The petitioner has sources of income and sufficient means to maintain his second wife. 3. Under the circumstances, I do not find merit in this Writ Petition. The Writ Petition stands dismissed. --- (S.K.SHAH,J.) (S.K.SHAH,J.) (S.K.SHAH,J.)