1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.394 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.394 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.394 OF 2005 Rajiv alias Giriraj Kishor ..... Appellant Bramhaswaroop Upadhyay Versus The State of Maharashtra ..... Respondent Mr. Arfan Sait for the Appellant. Mr. U.V. Nikam, APP for the Respondent. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. DATE : 5TH DECEMBER 2006 DATE : 5TH DECEMBER 2006 DATE : 5TH DECEMBER 2006 P.C. 1) The Appellant has preferred an appeal against the same impugned order through an Advocate. The said appeal being Criminal Appeal No. 976 of 2005 has been already admitted and the Appellant is enlarged on bail. 2) Hence, the Criminal Appeal No. 394 of 2005 is not entertained and the same is dismissed of. Copy of this order be forwarded to the Appellant. 2 (A.S. OKA, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.)