a \,,,, \ WW 14. Ku. Gee‘ra Agarwal, 17 years, 0/0 Lafe ShriMnhavir. x 15. Ku. Pooja AgarwaL 15 years, D/o Lafe - ShriMahavir. :i 16. Ku. Nilam AgarwaL 13 years, D/a Lafe Shri Mahavir. 17. Ku. Radha Agarwal, 11 yegr-s, D/o Lafe 4e 5hri Mahavir Agarwal. 18. Shri Sachin, 7 year-s, 5/0 Lam Shri Muhcvir Agarwal. Respondenfs No.14 1’0 18 are minor, Through na'rura! .guardian and mo‘l'her Respondem' No.12 Sushila Devi. Respondenfs No.6 1'0 18 all are WO Rajpur, P.5‘ & Tahsil ~ Rajpur, Dis‘rric‘r Surguja (C.6.). RESPONDENT 19. 5hri Dhansai, 4O years, 5/0 Shri Devnafh Defendan'r No.14 60nd, Occupation-Driver, R/o viHage- Budha Baghicha, P.S. & Tahsil-Rajpur, DisfricT-Surguja (C.6.) L'— f\ Nohe appears for The appeHan‘l' ORAL ORDER (Passed on 24.1.2006) The following oral order of The Cour? was passed by SRNA‘IAK, CJ. 1. The appeal was called ouT fwice for mo‘l’ion hearing. On boih fhe occasions, none appeared nor any represen‘rafion was made on behalf of The appellant 2. In The circums-l‘ance, fhe appeal is dismissed for non- prosecufion. V‘I/ Sd/« ’ ‘ Sdl— 7i DILIP RAOSAHEB DESHMUKH ' Chief Justice i i Judge