[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL W.P.NO.1872 OF 2008 Mr.Manohar Jaya Shetty ..Petitioner Vs. State of Mah. and Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.A.P.Mundargi counsel for Petitioner Ms.A.A.Mane A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : DECEMBER 12, 2008 DATE : DECEMBER 12, 2008 DATE : DECEMBER 12, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner has challenged the show-cause notice issued by respondent no.2 in Chapter Proceedings bearing No.27 of 2008. Only show cause notice is issued against the petitioner, hence, I am not inclined to interfere as it would be open to the petitioner to reply to the said show cause notice. It would also be open to him to examine witnesses or produce any documents if necessary. After considering the same, if the learned Special Executive Magistrate is of the opinion that it is [-2-] necessary to call upon the petitioner to furnish interim bond or final bond, then in that event, four days time be given to the petitioner to comply with the terms of the bond. At this stage, Mr.Mundargi states that in view of vacation, eight days time be granted. In view of the said request, eight days time is granted to the petitioner to comply with the terms of the bond. 3. Petition is disposed of with above directions. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]