IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15964 of 2008 NAGESHWAR PRASAD @ BUJAN PRASAD @ NAGESHWAR @ BUJAL PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 14.7.2008 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected twice considering the fact that he is the husband of the victim of a case registered under Sections 304(B) and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Submission is that the informant of this case who happens to be the father of the deceased has been examined in trial as P.W.6 and he has supported the prosecution case in examination-in-chief but in paragraph 12 of the cross-examination, he has stated that neither he nor his daughter was ever subjected to torture for any demand of additional dowry by the in- laws of his daughter. This witness has further stated that he had filed a petition subsequently by way of compromise and now he has no grievance. In this connection, learned counsel for the petitioner has filed certified copy of deposition of P.W.6 which is kept on the record. By order dated 21.5.2008, a report regarding stage of the trial was called for which has been received. From the report it appears that out of 8 chargesheet witnesses, only four have been examined. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner Nageshwar Prasad alias Bujan Prasad alias Nageshwar alias Bujal Prasad be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to 2 the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.IV, Nalanda at Biharsharif in Sessions Trial No. 851 of 2006. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)