@ gmaLE 35m" IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) w. Raw/No. Gr) Sqé3 OF 2011. M /, Naresh Prasad Yadav, S/ ofgui Shiv Prasad Yadav, aged about g3 years, R/o. Shanker Nagar, Bi1aspur, PETITIONER District Bilaspur (C.G.) V E R S U S / RESPONDENTS :1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Sacretary Departm€nt of Home, D.K.S. ’3 d‘ m Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director General of Police, Police Head Quarter Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. Superintendent of Police, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. " Station House Officer, Police Station Torwa, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. ””Smt. Sandhya Bai, W/o. Kashi Prasad, R/o, Shanker Nagar Torwa, Opposite House of Ashok Rao, Gondpara, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) G) 63/ Kamta Prasad Yadav, S/ 0. late Shri Hari Dayal Yadav, R/o. Gondpara, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 7. S. C. Shekh, Retired Patwari as Patwari Halka No. 22, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Wm)”; N Pgeygmmzjzw m zoo mm(W) W$rfé=vf$ mmm mm§wm 3941mm ammm B : Hon’ble Shri Manindra M Shrivastava 16-09-2011 Shri Shivraj Singh, counsel Shri V. V. S. Murthy, De uty Advocate Geheral amng with $hn Rakesh Jha, Deputy Govemment dvocate for the State/respondents Not to 4 on advance copy. Heard. The grievance ventilated th ough this petition that The petitioner had iodged a complaint in the Police tation, Torwa, aileging oommiesron of offence by respondents No.5 & 6t the effect that they have got the name of other persons recorded as ow er in respect of the tend owned by the petitioner. it is submitted that when no action was taken the matter was: reported to the Superintendent of oiice and other higher authorities hut tili date, no decision has been ta en. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the police may be dir cted to register offence and to conduct investigation in the matter of comp int lodged by the petitioner in view ofthe decision rend red by the Supreme Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu vs. State ofUttar P ash and Others, {2008) 2 36$ 405?, if no action is taken by the police au orities, the petitioner would he at liberty to tile complaint before the Magistr te. With the aforesaid observati n, the petition is finaily disoosed off Sd/— Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge Tumane S oh n J. A r d