HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA CRL.R.C.No.170 of 2001 ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case is directed against the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.238 of 2001 in C.C.No.177 of 1999 dated 18.01.2001 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Siddipet, Medak District, refusing to recall the Non Baillable Warrant issued against the petitioner. The petitioner herein is Accused No.1 in the aforesaid C.C.No.177 of 1999, which was originated on the private complaint given by the 1st respondent herein. It appears the petitioner herein filed Crl.P.No.5376 of 2000 seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.177 of 1999 and this Court, on 29.12.2000, while ordering notice before admission, granted interim stay of all further proceedings. Since Non Bailable Warrant is pending against the petitioner, he filed the aforesaid Crl.M.P.No.238 of 2001 and the Court below by order dated 18.01.2001 refused to recall the N.B.W issued against the petitioner. The said docket order reads as under: “This application to recall NBW issued against the petitioner. The NBW was issued against the petitioner on 23.10.2000. The proceedings in this case were stayed by the Hon’ble High Court on 29.12.2000. Hence, the N.B.W. pending against the petitioner cannot be recalled by this Court during the subsistence of the stay. In the circumstances of the case, the petition is returned.” Questioning the said order, the petitioner herein preferred the present revision. Heard both sides and perused the impugned order. From a perusal of the order in Crl.P.No.5376 of 2000, it is clear that this Court by order dated 08.04.2004 dismissed the said Criminal Petition for default. Therefore, the order of interim stay granted in C.C.No.177 of 1999 is no more in existence. In the aforesaid circumstances, the petitioner-A1 is directed to appear in person before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Siddipet, and file an application under Section 70 (2) Cr.P.C. seeking to recall the N.B.W pending against him and in such an event, the learned Magistrate may consider the same and recall the warrant. The Criminal Revision Case is accordingly disposed of. _______________________________ (GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J) 08.07.2010 Gsn.