IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.959 of 2008 -------- Sheo Pujan Ram son of Late Ghamandi Chamar, resident of Village – Bhaluha, P.S. – Rajpur, District – Buxar …….Petitioner-Appellant Versus 1. The Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Bihar, Patna 2. The Deputy Director of Consolidation, Bhojpur at Arrah 3. The Consolidation Officer, Rajpur, P.S. – Rajpur, District – Bhojpur at Arrah 4. Mostt. Bashmatia Wife of Late Ghurhu Chamar, 5. Ramadhar Chamar 6. Ramayan Chamar, both sons of Moti Chamar, Respondent nos. 4 to 6 are resident of village – Bhaluhi, P.S. – Rajpur, District –Bhojpur ……..Respondents/Respondents. ----------- For the Appellant : Mr. Vidya Nand Kumar, Advocate -------- P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal --------- Dated, the 04th December, 2008. The appeal is barred by eleven days for which an application (I.A.no.7186/2008) has been made. Even if, we condone the delay, we are of the considered view that appeal does not deserve to be admitted. 2. The counsel for the appellant has not challenged before us the competence and jurisdiction of the Deputy Director, Consolidation (Headquarter), Bihar in passing the order dated 11th - 2 - January, 2000. His contention is that the compromise decree before the Subordinate Judge 2nd Court, Ara in Title AppealNo.120 of 1966-67 has not been properly considered. 3. We are afraid, the Single Judge has adverted to the compromise petition filed in the said title appeal before the court of Subordinate 2nd Court, Ara, whereby Ghamandi was allowed four and half decimals of land in plot no.326 old. 4. Letters Patent Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed in limine. This disposes of I.A.No.7186 of 2008. R.M. Lodha, CJ Kishore K. Mandal, J. Sunil/