THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 1083 of 2003 Oral order: Though the petitioner has assailed the proceedings dated 26.11.2002, issued by the 2nd respondent, advising him to avail additional monetary benefit in lieu of compassionate appointment, but when the writ petition was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner does not want employment and as advised by the 2nd respondent in the impugned proceedings, he intends to avail additional monetary benefits in lieu of compassionate appointment. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents-APSRTC, and having regard to the stand taken by the counsel for the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with the following directions: The respondents are directed to pay the entitled additional monetary benefits in lieu of compassionate appointment to the petitioner as per the Rules and Circulars in vogue, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 7th August, 2007 KSR