pdp FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2206 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 9946 OF 2008 ------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s Memoranda of Coram, orders appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders ------------------------------------------------------ Mr. Pankaj Das i/by Mr. Rohan Darandale for applicant. Mr. Dilip Bodake for respondent nos.1, 4 and 5. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE,J. 19/03/2009. P.C.: . Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. First Appeal under Stamp No. 9946 of 2008 has been filed but belatedly and hence this application for condonation of delay. Though it has been stated that the appeal is beyond time by 51 days, the office report indicates that it is beyond time by 92 days. . In para 7 of the application explanation has been furnished and it has been made out that the delay caused on account of procedural formalities. Affidavit-in-reply has been filed on behalf of the respondents opposing the application. . I am satisfied that the appeal filed does not suffer from inordinate delay and the delay caused of three months deserves to be condoned but by levying cost. . Hence, the delay condoned and the application is allowed accordingly but subject to payment of cost quantified at Rs.1000/-. The cost amount to be paid to the claimants within four weeks from today. . List the appeal for admission before the appropriate Bench on 31/3/2009. (B.H. Marlapalle,J.)