1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. SUIT NO. 1832 OF 2001 Nidhi Diamond Exports Pvt.Ltd. .... Plaintiffs vs Hukmichand Jain & ors. ... Defendants Ms.Jyoti N. Shah for the plaintiffs. Mr. H. S. Murthy for defendants 1 and 2. Mr. N.M. Shah for defendnat no.4. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 29th July, 2009 P.C.: 1 The plaintiff and defendants 1 and 2 have settled the matter and, accordingly executed the Consent Terms dated 29.07.2009 signed by the respective Directors of the plaintiff and defendants along with their respective Advocates. There is no dispute or any objection with regard to the authorisation and signatures of the parties. The plaintiff is not seeking any relief against defendant no.3. There is no signature of defendant no.3 though he is a party to the proceeding. 2 The statement is made on behalf of the parties as well as the learned counsel appearing for them that this Consent Terms is well within the frame work of the record and the law. 2 3The parties have already agreed to the undertaking referred in the Consent Terms. Therefore, the undertaking is also accepted. 3 The present Suit is accordingly disposed of in view of this Consent Terms, which is taken on record and marked “X”. However, with liberty to defendant no. 3. 4 Refund of court fee, if any, be made in accordance with law. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)