THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CRIMINAL PETITION NO.8207 OF 2009. DATED: 07-10-2009. Between: 1.G.Adinarayana and another … Petitioners/A10 and A13 and 1. State of A.P. rep by Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad and another …Respondents/Complainants THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8207 OF 2009. ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners-A10 and A13 under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings in S.C.No.14 of 2008, on the file of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Piler. 2. After the evidence of prosecution witnesses is closed, the present petitioners said to be absconding. Therefore, the trial Court split up the case against the present petitioners and proceeded with the case and rendered judgment on 20-12-2007, in S.C.No.278 of 2004 whereunder whereby A2 to A4, A6 to A9, A11 and A12 were found not guilty of the charges levelled against them and accordingly they were acquitted. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners contended that it is not a case of taking fresh evidence against the petitioners in view of the fact that the evidence already recorded in the case has to be taken into consideration, that after appreciating the evidence on record, the trial Court came to the conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond all reasonable doubt and accordingly acquitted the accused, that even if the trial of the case against the present petitioners is to be proceeded further, the learned Assistant Sessions Judge cannot take a different view than the one taken in the judgment and therefore, continuation of proceedings against the present petitioners is nothing but abuse of process of Court. 4. As rightly pointed out by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the evidence against the present petitioners is the same in view of the fact that the present petitioners participated in the trial of the case and they said to have absconding after evidence of the prosecution witnesses is closed. Even if the case is proceeded further against the present petitioners, the trial Court may not take a different view than the one taken in the judgment. Hence, continuation of proceedings against the present petitioners is nothing but abuse of process of Court. 5. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed quashing the proceedings in S.C.No.14 of 2008, on the file of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Piler. --------------------- K.C.BHANU, J DATED: 07-10-2009 Hsd