1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Criminal Jurisdiction) Monday, the Fifth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.11640 of 2011 1 LOGANAYAKEE 2 THIRUMOORTHY 3 MEENAKSHI 4 SUBRAMANI :PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NOS.2 TO 5 -Vs- THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MADURAI TOWN, MADURAI DISTRICT. CR.NO.20 OF 2011. :RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. J.JEYAKUMARAN, Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 Cr.P.C. ORDER:The Court Made the following order:- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 498(A), 406 and r/w 34 I.P.C., in Crime No.20 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the marriage between the defacto complainant and A1 has been performed on 13.12.2007 and because of family dispute, he filed a petition, for dissolution of marriage, in H.M.O.P.No.273 of 2009 before the Family Court, Madurai. He further submitted that the petitioners are only in-laws of the defacto complainant and they are no way connected in the alleged commission of offence and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioners have demanded Pongal and Dewali Sreedhana from the defacto complainant and hence, a case has been registered against five persons. He further submitted that https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 A1/husband of the defacto complainant was already arrested and the investigation going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4.Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that the marriage between the defacto complainant and A1 has been performed on 13.12.2007 and because of family dispute, the first accused has filed H.M.O.P.No.273 of 2009 before the Family Court, Madurai, on 21.07.2009 and the same was pending and the petitioners are only in-laws of the defacto complainant, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai and on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 05/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO: 1.The Judicial Magistrate No:I, Madurai. 2.-Do- Thro' The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai. 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Madurai Town, Madurai District. +1. CC to M/S. J.JEYAKUMARAN Advocate SR.No.29761. RP/07.09.2011/2P/6C. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11640 of 2011 Date :05/09/2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/