IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH1 WRIT PETmON N0. ?^^?./2006. SIWGL PETITIO_NERi Sjo Ram Prasad Sahu, Khedu Ram Sahu, y..^—. ».-. „„„», aged about 38 years, residence of village Hardowa, Post Devkar, Tahsil ^•** viiiu^c nciiuuwfctj F'USL i./cvj^fcu, L'<V?'"'V?'^>"''' ..•• Saja, District Durg, Chhatdsgarh. ....^^p"'" ^e"-,\^l\j-'"' ^y\op <?^--""" Sy'Resoondents VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary School Education Department Ministry D.K.S.Bhavfan^Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Director of School Education Of5ceR( D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. The District Education Officer, Bemetara, Durg, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI. PROHIBIT10N AND FOR THE OTHER SIMILAR WRIT OR WRITS. ORDER OR ORDERS. DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. XI-HC-22 sn^rw R-ii+an^r sniishdfeT Bawe 3^''<11'!IIC11, ESTn^f'IS, Rcfiyy 3ii^i MKch ^^•^°^^tz^ f^;' 111WI sh*lich 3(1^1 6«IIW(lf?cT 12-7-; Heard Shri O.P. Sahu, coun' Govt. Advocate for the State/respond| The case of the petitioner since 19-12-88 and as perthe Instruc M.P. tne Assistant Teachers whol examination on their own expenses increments and order of Government B.T. I. examination on his own cost in| is Annexure-P/5, but the petitioner similarly situated persons 1-iave been| orders of the Tribunal and this Court Having heard learned counss and oircumstances of the case. withd case, the petitioner is allowed to mal of this petition raising a[l his grievanc) days from today and in turn, respon(| the petitioner in the light of avermenl jn the representation also. similarly situated persons have bj increments and the petitioner's cas| inorements on the basis of Governj period of 3 months from today, in With the direction aforesaid. tt' Parties are entitled for oertifie): cni<<Fci<fl-f •<l*lCTTffteiit'<Rl«K ^aif^iTsn^T respc|ndent '! for the petitioner and Shri Sumesh Bajaj, ;nts, on advance copy. that he is working as Assistant Teacher jtions dated 24-12-98 issued bythe State of have passed B.T.I., B.Ed. and M.Ed. fcfter 22-10-64 are entitled for two advance |is Annexure-P/1. The petitioner passed his |the year 1996 and a cerfficffle to that effect Ihas not been aiven the benefit whereas. Igranted two advance increments under the /ide Annexure-P/6. for the parties, having regard to the facts jjt expressing any opinion of the merit of the ^e a detaiied representation along with copy [es to'respondent No.3 within a period of 15 lent No.3 is directed to examine the oase of made by the petitioner in this petition and No.3 reaches to the cono!usion that ien granted the benefit of two advance is aiso covered for grant of t\w advance nent's order, then to pass orders within a with law. ie petition stands'disposed of. ofthisorder. Sd/- L.C. BhsetBO acctordance ('ft^yN')