THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Civil Revision Petition No.4850 of 2008 ORDER: This civil revision petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order, dated 31.0.7.2008, passed in I.A.No.221 of 2008 in O.S.No.238 of 2002 on the file of the IV Additional Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Ranga Reddy District, whereby the petition filed by respondent No.1 herein, plaintiff in the suit, praying the Court below to receive, on record, the certified copy of General Power of Attorney said to have been executed by the petitioners herein, defendants 1 to 4 in the suit, in favour of defendants 5 to 7, was allowed and the said document was received on record, subject to proof and relevancy. Learned counsel for the petitioners-defendants 1 to 4 contended that the plaintiff has not furnished the details of the document sought to be received and that, by virtue of the impugned order, she brought on record the G.P.A. bearing document No.63 of 1993 dated 27.01.1993, which was in fact superseded by subsequent G.P.A. and which is not at all relevant to the present suit and, moreover, there is no mention in the plaint or suit agreement of sale about the said document. On the other hand, learned counsel for the 1st respondent- plaintiff supported the impugned order and contended that defendant Nos.1 to 4, in their written statement, have taken a defence that defendants 5 to 8 have no power to represent them, and to disprove the said defence, the plaintiff sought to bring on record the document in question. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the impugned order and other material available on record. A perusal of the affidavit filed by the plaintiff in support of the present application reveals that the plaintiff has not furnished the details of the document sought to be received on record. The defendants have pointed out the same in their counter and also contended that the plaintiff cannot introduce any document, which is not related to the suit transaction and about which there is no pleading in the plaint. The Court below, without considering the same, simply held that though the respondents, petitioners herein, opposed the claim, it does not find any reason to prevent the plaintiff from filing the document and the defendants will get an opportunity to cross-examine the witness, through whom the said G.P.A. is to be marked. The Court below did not record any findings for arriving at such a conclusion. In the circumstances, the impugned order dated 31.07.2008 is liable to be set aide and is, accordingly, set aside. However, the 1st respondent-plaintiff is at liberty to file a fresh application before the Court below along with a detailed affidavit, indicating the details of the document sought to be received and reasons to receive the same. If any such application is filed, the Court below shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, taking into consideration the objections of the defendants, if any. With the above observations, the civil revision petition is disposed of. No costs. ________________________ JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA 25th January, 2010 IBL