WP(C) 2166/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard A. Roshid, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ghosh, learned State Counsel. The petitioner is before this Court with a grievance against the inaction of the State respondents qua his request for being appointed as Circle Organizer in Village Defence Organization in the District of Cachar, Silchar. A ccording to him, in response to an advertisement dated 2/8/2001 also for appoint ment to the same post, he participated therein but though selected, was denied a ppointment. Being aggrieved, the petitioner approached this Court with WP(C) 771 6/2001 which was closed on 3/11/2006 as infructuous. This Court, however, parted with the direction to the respondents to consider his case in future if occasio n so arises provided, he fulfils the eligibility conditions as per the Rules. Th e petitioner has since submitted a representation before the Chief Controller of Village Defence Organisation, Assam, on 13/6/2008 seeking appointment against o ne of the two such vacant posts presently available in the district of Cachar, S ilchar. The representation remains undisposed till date. Upon hearing the learned Counsel for the parties and on a consid eration of the background of the facts and circumstances of the case, this petit ion is disposed of with a direction to the Chief Controller of Village Defence O rganisation, Assam, to take a decision on the petitioner’s representation. It is made clear that the direction of this Court as contained in the judgment and or der dated 3/11/2006 passed in WP(C) 7716/2001 ought not to be construed to be on e to provide him with appointment to the post dehors the Rules therefor. The abo ve named authority would dispose of the petitioner’s representation as directed strictly in accordance with law. As the representation is pending for nearly a y ear, the exercise as ordered should be completed within a period of six weeks fr om the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. No costs.