IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1317 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: December 2, 2009. Amrit Lal Bansal ...Petitioner(s) v. Shri B.M. Parbhakar & Ors. ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Shri Arun Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri G.S. Anand, Advocate for the respondents. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): Respondent No.4 is present in court. It is not in dispute that the vacant possession of the premises in question has been handed over to the petitioner/landlord. A photocopy of the handing over and taking over of the premises in question has been placed on record. In view of the aforesaid, this court is not inclined to proceed further in this petition. Rule discharged. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek his remedy to recover alleged house tax, if any, with regard to the premises in question from the respondent-Bank, in accordance with law. December 2 , 2009. [ Rakesh Kumar Garg ] kadyan Judge