SCA/3135/1988 1/2 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 3135 of 1988 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= BHOGILAL N. PATEL ASST:CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS - Petitioner(s) Versus PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, & 2 - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : RULE NOT RECD BACK for Petitioner(s) : 1, MR HUKUMSING AGP for Respondent(s) : 1, 3, RULE SERVED for Respondent(s) : 2, ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH Date : 09/05/2008 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order of reversion dtd.3/6/1988 reverting him from the post of Assistant Conservator of Forest to the post of Range Forest Officer. SCA/3135/1988 2/2 JUDGMENT 2. Mr.Hukumsingh, learned AGP under the instructions of Mr.Mukesh Chauhan, Legal Superintendent, Forest Department has stated that after the impugned order of reversion, present Special Civil Application was filed and initially there was a stay order granted but subsequently it was vacated and accordingly pursuant to the impugned order, the petitioner came to be reverted to the post of Range Forest Officer. He has also further stated that thereafter, the petitioner has been promoted to the post of Assistant Conservator of Forest in normal course and thereafter again he has been further promoted. Thus, after the impugned order, the petitioner has been given two promotions. He has further submitted that as per the instructions from the petitioner, the petitioner has no objection if the petition is disposed of in view of the above. 3. In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned AGP, the present petition is disposed of. Rule is discharged. No costs. [M.R. SHAH, J.] rafik