1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PEITION NO.3039 OF 2009 Rameshwar s/o Madhavrao Khandare .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri S.N.Pagare, Advocate for petitioner - absent Shri N.N.Jadhav, AGP for respondents 1 and 2 Petition dismissed as against respondents 3 to 7 as per Court’s order dated 18.8.2009 CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND A.V. POTDAR, JJ. DATE : 1st September 2009 PER COURT : 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner when this petition was called out. 2. It appears that by virtue of our order dated 18.8.2009 this petition stood dismissed against respondents 3 to 7 as Bhatta was not paid by the petitioner. The petitioner has prayed that respondents be directed to grant annual increments to the petitioner as per Government Resolution dated 22.5.1998. Undisputedly, it would be the liability of the respondents against whom the petition has been dismissed to pay the annual increments. 2 3. In the light of the dismissal of the petition against respondents 3 to 7, this petition is dismissed for default against respondents 1 and 2. ( A.V.POTDAR, J.) ( P.V.HARDAS, J.) vvr/3039.09wp