1 WP 1918.11.sxw JPP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1918 OF 2011 Mr. Anil Tanaji Kamble. ... Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents. Mr. G.A. Tambe for the Petitioner. Mr. A.S. Shitole, APP for the State. Mr. Prasad Borkar for Respondents 2 to 4. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 06th SEPTEMBER 2011. P.C. :- Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner and for the Respondents. 2. The Petitioner allegedly was a guarantor to financial facilities to principal borrower one Kumawat. In the process, purported flat belonging to the Petitioner and also the original borrower were under lien. The Petitioner questions existence of the flat. He also questions the act of arbitration award. 3. Several features of the matter involving orders of Co- operative Court, arbitration award and the conduct of the Respondents are advanced. The request by the Petitioner 2 WP 1918.11.sxw before the learned Metropolitan Magistrates was in terms of investigation under Section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C. However, the learned Judge did not find merit in the said contention. Consequently, rejected the same. It is a matter of record, said order of rejection is not question. Subsequently, the learned Judge directed inquiry in the matter and verification statement of the Complainant was recorded in tune of Section 200 of Cr.P.C. Submissions were heard and having gone through the record and the submissions, the learned Judge did not find merit in the complaint and it was dismissed in terms of Section 203 of Cr.P.C. 4. The order of the learned Judge refusing to entertain the complaint, on fact situation and primary evaluation, find no fault. This has been even confirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge in Criminal Revision Application No.253 of 2009 by his order dated 21st April 2011. The Petition lacks merit. Dismissed. All contentions between the parties are kept open. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)