HKH COWTOF CHHATTISfeUtH A7 SSSLASfW W. P.fa No. 1565 of 2007 Petitionw Versus Respondents Hingirathi P<rtel, S/o Shri Udey RamPat-el, Agedabout44years, Assistant Teacher Primwy Sehool bongiya Btock-Sororgorh Nstt. Rdgorh[C.6.] 1. SftiteofOihattiagflrh Thrpugh:- Secretwy Bducutton Depwtment, t>XS. Bhaiwn, R«^)UF 2. The Oireetor, Public instruetion, &.K.S. Biawan, Roipur (C.6.) 3. JointOirector, PiArfie Instruction OMsion, Rugw+t (C.6.) 4. Oistrict Education Officer Diatt. Ro^erh [C.6.] 5. Block Education Officw Btock Saningarh tfett. Roi9<rh SB; Hon'bleMr.JtBticeSatish K. ^gn(h»tri,J Present: Mr. Sanjey Pctel, Advocate fpr the petitioner. Mr. Deepoli P«m<tey,PanelLwyer forState/re^iondents. OROER (Passed m ttiis 19* t)ay of March, 2007) I. The <|uestion of tawi imio^ed herein <sto uihelher the petitionw is entitledtor^ularpayscale w.c.f. the datc of initwlappointnwnt or froni the date of completion of probation period. Leamed counsd appeanng fw tfte petitioner ces «»eltas for the State/respondents johitly subfait •Hwt the facts and questton of law involved •Hie present writ petitiwiare •the same to tiwt of in W. P. (5) No. 7240/2006 (Ku. Neel Kusum 6kl«a vs. B^T-^5 ^' A...... l'--»a' ^"""^'^•^-'^^^^^ 03^t2007. ' I"m-fcub-"——-^^^^ P^t^ th»i^it petition is disposed of m^ , costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotti , Judge y^ \ same tmns. Noonlerasto \ Subkuh ^-