Cqc 1a C79 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR ICHHATTISGARHI w. P. No.‘3T7 Ex OF 2003 / PETITIONER Arun Singh, S/o J.P. Singh, Sub— engineer aged about 45 years, Gramin- Yantriki Seva, Janpat Surguja. Panchyat,’ Balrampur, District — / VERSUS RESPONDENTS {L 1. Statcgaf‘chhattisgarh through yaré Secre’téry, Panchyat 85 rural Development Department, D.K.S. Bhavvan , Raipur. Chief Executive Officer, , Janpat Panchyat, Balram—pur, District ~ Surguja. Deputy Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Department of Panchyat & Rural Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur 1-11-200 23 5hri Abhishek Sinha, caun’sel for 1'he pefi‘rioner. 5hri Ranbir' Singh, Govt A 1 and 3. Heard both The counsel By +his pe'ri‘rion filed unde India, The pe‘rifioner has chal whereby The pe'ri‘rioner has been on 1'he ground of his requesf f Janpa‘r Panchayu‘r, Lundm. The case of The pefifionen Engineer under 'l'he 6mmin Van and mo‘l’he’r aged abou‘l’ 75 years. af his presen'r place of posfing represenTaTion To respondenT place where The medical‘faciliTie receive proper medical TreaTmen . leTTer Annexure—P/l'from respo peTiTioner wroTe a leTTer To The is Annexure-P/Z. AfTer receivi respondenTs wiThouT considerin ivocafe fakes nofice for respondem‘s 13V f? r Arficle 226 of the Consfifu‘rion of enged fhe order da‘red 1-10-2003 Transferred aT his own expense and "om JanpaT PanchayaT, Bairampur To is ThaT peTiTioner is working as Sub Triki Seva and presenTly posTed aT / JanpaT PanchayaT, Balmmpur. The peTiTioner has old parenTs faTher As no medicai faciliTies‘ are available , Therefore, The peTiTloner made a . 1 and 3 To Transfer him aT any are available so ThaT his parenTs can On This, The peTiTioner received a denT No.3 and in pursuanT ThaT The DepuTy SecreTary, copy of The same g This requesT of The peTiTioner, The difficulTy of The peTiTioner fl#/I s XI-HC—22 ' ' fransferred him a‘r Lundra and iJf has been said 'l'ha'r ‘l'he fransfér has been effected on The requesf 3f 1'he pe'l'i‘Honer, whereas no medical fucilifies are availuble n‘r Lundra,‘ Therefore, The impugned order be quashed. r BM Learned counsel for The pe‘l’iTioner submi‘fs ‘éfha'r since The Transfer in quesfion has/been m de showing ThaT iT has been made on The requesT of The peTiTione whereas, in facT, requesT of The peTiTioner has noT been Taken c re of while issuing The Transfer order. As no medical facili‘l'ies are ailable aT Lundra, Therefore, The peTiTioner may be allowed To v e a deTailed represenTaTion before respondenTs 1 and 3 To which learned counsel for respondenTs 1 and 3 has no ob‘jecTion. /, Having heard The learne counsel for The parTies and having regard To' The facTs and circum Tances of The case, The peTiTioner is allowed To make a deTailed repr senTaTion raising all his grievances To respondenT No. 1‘ and 3 wiThin a eriod 15 days from Today and in Turn respondenT No. 1 and 3 will consider The represenTaTion of The peTiTioner and afTer considering all his grievances shall pass reasoned order in an objecTive manner w receipT of The represenTaTion. If The peTiTioner has a Then he may he allowed To conTin e Till The represenTaTion is decided. ,R in a period 3O days from The daTe of I dy noT been relieved from The' posT k e i l