1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO.155/2008 Kedarmal Bijraj Bajaj ....Versus... The State of Maharashtra and others ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Shri A.C. Dharmadhikari, Adv. for appellant] [Smt. T.D. Khade, AGP for respdt. Nos.1 and 2] CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 10.07.2009 A finding of fact has been recorded by the Courts below that police officer has a power to seize and he cannot be compared with Food Inspector, who is not specially empowered. A Police Officer under the Code of Criminal Procedure has full powers to seize the vehicles and goods whenever he is satisfied that there is a suspicion. Thus action of the police officer in seizing the articles, L.P.G. cylinders and vehicle cannot be said to be illegal. At any rate, damages cannot be claimed for such type of reasons. There is no reason for me to interfere with the findings of facts recorded by the Courts below on this specific question and at any rate there is no question of law much less substantial question of law involved in the second appeal. The same is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE ssw