THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.16133 of 2007 ORDER: This Court issued rule nisi on 27.07.2007 and granted an order of status-quo for a limited period, which is being extended from time to time. The writ petition is filed seeking to issue a writ of Certiorari calling for records pertaining to the 4(1) notification as published by the respondents in Rc.No.G2/2215/2006, dated 12.05.2006 as published in Vaartha, Telugu Daily, dated 12.05.2006, and the notice, dated 13.07.2007, issued by respondent No.1 under Sections 9(3) and 10 of the Land Acquisition Act, for acquiring the land of 120 feet in the premises of the 1st petitioner bearing No.38-8-17 situated in Ward No.10, M.G.Road (Bandar Road), Block No.13, NTS No.373, Vijayawada, and premises of the 2nd petitioner bearing No.38-8-9, situated in Ward No.10, M.G.Road (Bandar Road), Block No.13, NTS No.373, Vijayawada, instead of acquiring 100 feet as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, discriminatory, opposed to the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and quash the same and pass appropriate orders. Several facts had been narrated in detail in the affidavit, filed in support of the writ petition. W.P.M.P.No.33135 of 2009 is filed praying for reception of memo No.14515/K2/2007, dated 09.10.2009, issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh, MA, UD (K2) Department, as additional material papers and to direct the respondents to implement the same and pass suitable orders. It is stated that the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Municipal Administration and Irrigation Development Department, after calling for remarks from the fourth respondent was pleased to issue memo No.14515/K@/2007, dated 09.10.2009. The relevant portion of the memo at para No.5 reads as hereunder: - “In view of the above circumstances, Government after careful examination of the matter and in continuation of the Govt. Memo dt.12.10.2007, hereby further direct the Commissioner, Vijayawada Municipal Corporation, Vijayawada and Vice Chairman, VGTMUDA to restrict the width of road with 100 feet as averred by the Vice Chairman, VGTMUDA, in his affidavit placed before the Hon’ble High Court, as was done in the case of other properties, and also subject to outcome of court cases if any in various courts and take necessary action to withdraw the present acquisition notification.” It is needless to say that the respondents are bound to follow what had been specified in the memo aforesaid. In the light of the same, let the respondents follow what had been specified in the memo aforesaid, within a period of eights weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA Dated:15th December 2009 Note: Issue CC in two days.