¥- ^ /•fVH iT W.P.fS) hto. 23?3 of 2007 Sahu Age about Teacher (Scler School, bundera, years, Asst-t. Sovt. H.S. .-Dura R/o - Versus .-burg (C.&.) Throuah ; Secretary, School Education Departmsnt, .A'i|antraloya at b.K.S. Bhavan, Raipu" (C.$.) The K'rector, Director'ate of Public Instruction, Pensionboda, Raipur (C.6.) District - &urg (C.6.) Wr'it Petition under Article 226 of the Constitut'on of Indla iingle Bench; Hon'bSe Alr. Jugfice K. AymhoM. Mr. ftakesh .Anthony, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Awlnd bubey, Pane! ents. lis 18" &ay of Aprii, 2007 !. The question of tca» inyotved herein is asto whether the petitioner is entitled to reguiar p<y seale w.e.f. fhe dote of initiat appointmerrt or from the date of compigtfon of probation period. 2. learned counsei app<aring for the petitioner as weH as state/respondents jointiy submit thot the focts and question of law involved in the pressnt wr!"t petition are the swne os to that of in w. QNo. 7A/?nn ' / O/ £VX36 (Sushil Tiwari and others vs. Stote ©overnment of Chhattisgarh & otiiers), whieh was al!o»vedvide order dated 7.11.^)6. 3. In view of the above-stoted submissions made by lecr-ned counset for- the parties, the writ petition is aSlowed in the same terms. No order as to Sd/- Satish K. Agmhotri Judge Subhssh ^