-1 - VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL No. 356 OF 2006 ______________________________________________ Office Ntes, Office : Memoranda of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s appeaances, Court’s : order orders or directions : and Registrar’s : orders : ______________________________________________ Mr. Machhindra Patil, advocate for the appellants. CORAM : S. J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : AUGUST 28, 2007. PC . This Second Appeal raises no question of law. The disputed fact is regarding entitlement of the respondent/defendant to the suit land. Extensive evidence was relied upon by both the parties. It is also pertinent to note that in the Consolidation Prceedings, admittedly the land has been held to be that of the respondent. That finding has -2 - not been challanged up to date. . It cannot be said that either of the Courts below failed to appreciate the evidence. In the circumstances, the appeal is dismissed.