1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5637/2009. (Subhash Narayanrao Pise and others . -: versus :- Joint Charity Commissioner, Nagpur and others .) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JANUARY 11, 2010. Heard Shri A.P. Thakre, learned counsel for petitioners, Shri A.M. Ghare, learned counsel for respondent no.2 and learned A.G.P. for respondent no.1. Shri Thakre, learned counsel is trying to raise certain valid objections to the interlocutory orders which according to him is infact having final effect. Shri Ghare, learned counsel as also learned A.G.P. point out that the contingency in relation to which the impugned order came to be passed on 8.12.2009 is already over. I have perused the order and it appears that in relation to some competition Scheduled between 24.12.2009 to 27.12.2009 the interim orders were passed. Those competitions are already over and the impugned order has exhausted itself. 2 I, therefore, find that the arguments raised by Shri Thakre, learned counsel are rendered only academic in the present circumstances. Hence, without observing anything on merits, in relation to the said orders while clarifying that the findings / observations in the impugned order dated 18.12.2009 shall not come in the way of the petitioner in any way, the present Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. No costs. JUDGE Rgd.