IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4119 of 2010 1. SUNIL BHARTI son of Hari Lal Bharti 2. Sujit Bharti son of Hari Lal Bharti Both are residents of vill.-Chanawey, P.S.-Thawe, Distt.-Gopalganj----------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . 2. 4.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are elder and younger brothers of the husband making defence on different grounds, more specifically marriage is beyond seven years and they are separate from the husband. But allegation is clear and specific about demand and torture at petitioners’ hand also followed by statement of the deceased to her cousin (informant) which is supported by her sons as observed by the learned Sessions Judge in his rejection order. Marriage if can be doubted beyond seven years but statement of the deceased’s son cannot be doubted about petitioners’ involvement for the offence under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code though this much of the observation shall not be taken any way in course of trial. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J. )