1 ca233.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATTION NO. 233 OF 2010 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 116 OF 2010 Mrs. Vanita Manish Sachar .. Applicant V/s. Mr. Manish Kumar Mahavir Singh Sachar .. Respondent. Mrs. B. P. Jakhade for the Applicant. Mr. R.R. Mishra for the Respondent. CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 1ST SEPTEMBER, 2010. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. Admittedly, the applicant is in the regular employment of National Insurance Company and her transfer from the establishment to another in Mumbai Metropolitan area cannot be a reason to hold that she is dependent on her brother. The Family Court had granted maintenance to the minor son of Rs. 3,500/- per month. We are informed that the son is of 16 yeas of age and it is the contention of the applicant that she is required to spend more 2 ca233.10.sxw amount on the son’s maintenance including the expenses for education and well being. 3. We grant liberty to the applicant to file a fresh application giving better particulars in support of her prayer for enhancement of maintenance granted to her son. 4. Civil Application disposed off accordingly. (A.A.SAYED,J.) (B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.)