IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 31ST OCTOBER 2011 / 9TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 29000 of 2011(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- ALAN ALEXANDER VAIDYAN, PUTHENPARAMBIL HOUSE, PATHANAPURAM PO, QUILON 689695. BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW PHILIP EDAPPALLIL RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. M.G.UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS PO, KOTTAYAM 686 560. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, M.G.UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS PO, KOTTAYAM 686 560. SRI.T.A.SHAJI, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.29000/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION OF ANSWER SHEET OF THE PETITIONR IN NETWORK THEORY IN SEMESTER III SUPPLY.EXAMINATION HELD IN MAY 2011. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE HALL TICKET OF THE ABOVE EXAMINATION. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF FEE RECEIPT DATED 14.10.11 FOR THE REVALUATION. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 29000 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 31st day of October, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the 3rd Semester examination was declared, he had failed in one paper viz., “Network Theory”. He applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the University for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp