1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 1851/2011 (Ravikiran B. Sadanshiv and others. .vs. State of Mah. And ors. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders Mr. J.M. Shamkuwar, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. S.J. Jichkar, AGP for Respondent no.1. CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATED : JUNE 08, 2011 Heard. The grievance is a Graduate Teacher who is given the pay-scale against 25 % quota, is eligible to that scale from the date on which he acquires the qualification. We find the grievance misconceived. The impugned order dated 5.1.2011 grants petitioner no.1 that pay-scale and up-gradation from the date on which he joins the post. During the arguments, the learned counsel has further urged that respondent no.2 – Zilla Parishad has not prepared any seniority list. According to learned AGP appearing for respondent no.1, the judgment on which reliance is being placed i.e. the judgment dated 21.10.2005 in Writ Petition No. 4772/2004 and other connected matters, is not relevant in present facts. We permit the petitioners to raise appropriate demands with their employer and to approach this Court 2 again if need arises. With this liberty, the writ petition is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE halwai