IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.15515 of 2011 Date of Decision : August 24, 2011. Amrinder Singh .....Petitioner versus The State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.R.K.Chopra, Senior Advocate, with Ms.Maninder, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks a direction for his appointment as Art and Craft Teacher in the Sports Category. It is alleged that the private respondents who are lower in merit, have already been given appointment while ignoring the petitioner's claim. In my considered view, if the averments made by the petitioner are found to be true, his claim for appointment requires to be considered by the competent authority. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to treat this writ petition as a representation on behalf of the petitioner and dispose of his claim by passing a speaking order, within a CWP No.15515 of 2011 [2] period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to submit two copies of the writ petition in the Registry to enable it to send the same to respondent No.2 alongwith a copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. August 24, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE