IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.629 of 2009 NANDLAL GUPTA @ N.L.GUPTA SON OF LATE GAURISHANKAR GUPTA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE/MOHALLA- SHIVAM APARTMENT, OPPOSITE GAYATRI MANDIR, KANKARBAGH, PATNA- 800020. OWNER OF SIDHHARTH ENTERPRISES, SHIVAM APARTMENT, OPPOSITE- SHIVAM APARTMENT, KANKARBAGH, PATNA. POLICE STATION- KANKARBAGH, DISTRICT- PATNA. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 07.12.2010 Petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 05.12.2008, passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in Jamui Police Station case No. 125 of 2008, registered under Section 414 of the IPC, whereby the application seeking release of the seized article(s) i.e., 8 bundles of aluminium wire have been considered and rejected. It appears from the impugned order that there is/are more than one claimant(s) to the seized aluminium wire which is the subject matter of the case for which a case has been lodged under Section 414 IPC and the matter is under consideration. It is next submitted that no appropriate inquiry as contemplated under the provisions of the Code was made before rejecting the claim of the petitioner for release. From perusal of the order impugned it appears 2 that there is more than one claimant. An enquiry appears to have been made by the Court whereafter the impugned order has been passed. Having regard to that aspect of the matter, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the order. However, the petitioner is granted liberty to approach the said Court once again for release of the seized articles whereafter the court below shall make adequate/detailed enquiry and consider the submissions of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. If upon perusal of the materials the conclusion of enquiry, if any, made by the Court and the materials/documents placed by the petitioner, the court below is satisfied that the seized articles required to be released in favour of the petitioner on furnishing adequate securities to be determined by the Court, the present order dated 07.12.2010 shall not come in the way of the Court. With this observation the application is disposed of. Amrendra (K.K. Mandal. J,)