IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35104 of 2008 KUNDAN KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 14.01.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State and learned Counsel for the informant. The petitioner is husband and accused of the case which has been registered under Sections 304(B)/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The death is within the period prescribed and there is allegation that the victim was being subjected to torture prior to her death. Submission is that other accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail. Petitioner is the husband and his role cannot be equated with others. Considering this, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)