IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.1821 of 2010 SANJEET MAHTO @ RAJESH MAHTO @ RAJESH KUMAR, S/O SOGARATH MAHTO @ RAM SOGARATH MAHTO @ RAM SWARATH MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR **** /2/ 02.02.2010 Heard both the sides. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner’s name was disclosed on the confession of the co- accused, but, there has been no recovery from his possession and before the present case he had no antecedent, but, has been booked in another case after being remanded in the present case, let the petitioner, above named, who is a young boy and is in custody since 09.09.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (rupees five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Rail G.R.P (SPJ) P.S. Case No. 51 of 2009 to the satisfaction of the Railway Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, on the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the Court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the Court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse and (iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date 2 fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner then his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. 4. Looking into the age of the present petitioner it will be desirable that the petitioner reports to the Head Priest of Thaneshwar Asthan, Samastipur, within fifteen days of his release from jail custody and file a certificate about the same in the Court. The Head Priest is requested to keep the petitioner gainfully engaged for the next six months so that there is no chance of further implication of the petitioner in such type of cases. At the end of six months the Head Priest will give a certificate about the petitioner’s conduct to be filed in the Court below. S.A. (Anjana Prakash, J.)