THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P. No.1585 of 2010 ORDER: The respondent fled O.S.No.8 of 2008 in the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Allagadda, against the petitioner for recovery of certain amount. The suit was decreed on 30-01-2009, and after the decree became final, the respondent filed E.P.No.68 of 2009, with a prayer to cause arrest of the petitioner and to send him to civil prison. It was pleaded that though the petitioner is possessed of adequate means, he has failed to comply with the decree. The petitioner opposed the E.P., on several grounds. Through its order dated 23-03-2010, the Executing Court allowed the E.P. Hence this C.R.P. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Though the respondent is served with the notice, he has not chosen to enter appearance. The petitioner does not dispute his obligation under the decree. Further, he is an employee, drawing salary of more than Rs.15,000/- per month. That is sufficient to hold him liable to be arrested. The petitioner submits that he is prepared to pay the decretal amount, if the facility of installments is granted. While issuing notice before admission, this Court granted interim stay on condition that the petitioner shall deposit one-third of the decretal amount. The condition is said to have been complied with. Hence, the C.R.P., is partly allowed, modifying the order under revision, to the effect that the petitioner shall be entitled to clear the balance of the decretal amount in monthly installments of Rs.8,000/, payable on or before 5th of every month, commencing from April, 2011. The respondent shall be entitled to withdraw the one- third of the decretal amount, that has already been deposited, and the installment, that may be paid in future. If the petitioner commits default in payment of two consecutive installments, the Executing Court shall be entitled to enforce the order under revision. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.08-03-2011. KO