IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22694 of 2009 DILIP KUMAR DAS @ DILIP DAS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 25.07.2009 Heard both sides. Sole petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Section 392 of the Penal Code. As per allegation in the F.I.R., the informant along with his wife was going home on a motorcycle. Three accused persons intercepted and relieved their belongings at gun point. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the two materials that have surfaced so far against the petitioner is/are that one of the co-accuseds made a confessional statement naming him and that petitioner is also allegedly made an inculpatory statement before the police. This court finds from the impugned order that these are the two materials relying whereof his prayer for bail has been rejected. It appears that petitioner is in custody since 21.10.2008. Referring to the statements made in the bail application, it has been contended that petitioner carries clean antecedent. In the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Amarpur P.S.Case no. 173 of 2008, 2 subject to the condition that one of the bailors should be the own/close family member of the petitioner. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)