1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2638 OF 2009 1.Dhanyakumar Vishwanath Chopade .. 2.Satish Vishwanath Chopade .. Applicants. Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondents. Mr.Satyajeet Rajeshirke for the applicants. Mr.S.S.Pednekar A.P.P. for the State. Coram: D.B. BHOSALE, J. Dated : 25TH June, 2009 P.C. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in C.R.No.41 of 2009 of Kurduwadi Police Station, District Solapur. The crime has been registered against the applicants for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 392, 504 and 506 of IPC. 3. I have perused the FIR and other material placed on record. In this matter on last occasion i.e. 17.6.2009 the applicants were directed to report to the concerned police station and co-operate with the investigation. Mr.Pednekar, learned A.P.P., on instructions, submits that the applicants have 2 attended the concerned police station regularly and co-operated with the investigation and now they do not require their custody for interrogation. In the circumstances I pass the following order: In the event of arrest, applicants be released on bail in the sum of Rs.5,000/- each with one or two sureties to make up the said amount, subject to the conditions incorporated in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of Cr.P.C. The applicants shall report to the concerned police station as and when required. While passing this order I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. Application is disposed of. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)