1 caw233.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.233 OF 2011 In WRIT PETITION NO.5145 OF 2008 Maharashtra General Kamgar Union : Applicant V/s. Shri Shabbir A. Patel & Ors. : Respondents .... Mr.N.M.Ganguli for the applicant. Mr.Vaibhav Nagvekar i/b. Judicare Law Associates for resp. no.1. Mr.V.A.Sonpal, `A’ panel counsel for respondent no.2. Mr.Suhas Patil i/b. Navdeep Vora & Asso. for respondent no.3. .... CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ. DATE : MAY 03, 2011. P.C.: This application has been filed in pending Writ Petition No.5145 of 2008. The said Writ Petition has been filed by the auction purchaser in respect of plot originally owned by the company in which the applicant’s members were employed as workers. The Writ Petition, however, has been filed by the auction purchaser to challenge the Government decision dated 30.10.2007 pertaining to the grant of N.O.C. to the auction 2 caw233.11 purchaser. Whether that petition succeeds or fails cannot enure to the benefit of the workers of the company whose property has already been disposed of by conducting public auction. The relief claimed in the present application by the workers’ Union, in our opinion, cannot be taken forward in the pending Writ Petition and is not even an incidental issue concerning the matters in issue in the pending writ petition. If the applicants are so advised, they are free to take recourse to such other appropriate remedies as may be advised and ask for substantive relief in that behalf. 2. The Application is disposed of with liberty to the applicant to pursue such remedy as may be permissible in law. (A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.) (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.)