(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 5108 OF 1997 Matoshree Ramabai Magasvargiy Mahila Vikas Mandal, through its Chairman, Mrs. Babita w/o. Mahendra Tajne, Age : 32 years, Occupation : Household work & Social work, R/o. Farshi Road, Amalner, District : Jalgaon - 425 401. .. Petitioner. versus 1. The State of Maharashtra. 2. The Minister for State for Urban Development, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 400 032. 3. The Director of Municipal Administration, New Administrative Building, 15th Floor, Opp. Mantralaya, Mumbai - 400 032. 4. The Municipal Council, Amalner, District : Jalgaon, through its Chief Executive Officer. (2) 5. The Collector, Jalgaon. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. P.R. Patil, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mrs. R.K. Ladda, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos.1, 2, 3 and 5. Mr. V.J. Dixit, Senior Advocate, for respondent no.4. ........................ CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE : 22ND JUNE 2010 COURT'S ORDER : 1. By the present petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents, to implement the reservation policy for the women and Backward Classes as per Government Resolution dated 15th September 1995. 2. We are afraid, whether the present petition would be tenable at the behest of the petitioner, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court, in the case of Neetu Vs. State of Punjab & (3) others (2007 AIR SCW 448). 3. Apart from that, it would be pertinent to refer to paragraph 9 of the affidavit in reply filed on behalf of the Municipal Council, which reads as under : " I submit that municipal administration is aware about the applicability of Govt. Resolution, dated 15-9-1995 and 200 Point Roster. I submit that the municipal administration is also aware about the 30 % reservation made in favour of women. I submit that as and when vacancies are made, dare is taken to give appropriate reservation to the class mentioned in Govt. Resolution, dated 15-9-1995. " 4. In view of the categorical statement made on behalf of respondent no.4 / Municipal Council, that as and when vacancies are made, care would be taken to give appropriate reservation to the class mentioned in Government Resolution, dated 15-9-1995, the purpose of the petition stands served. 5. In that view of the matter, the petition is disposed of by accepting statement made on behalf of respondent no.4 / (4) Municipal Council. Rule is discharged. There shall be no order as to costs. ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA ) ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp5108