1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 2388 OF 2009 Gulabsing S/o Bhuryasing Chavan Versus The State of Maharashtra. *** Mr. S. K. Katneshwarkar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs. B. R. Khekale, A.P.P. for the Respondent / State. *** 1. Heard learned counsel. The complainant, while returning from railway station, on the way, was accosted by the accused/ applicant and they have commanded him to decamp forcibly, and removed Rs. 2,600/- from the shirt pocket of the complainant by assaulting him and since the complainant was raising alarm, the persons nearby rushed and due to the melee the four suspects left the place. The matter was immediately reported to the police. The suspects were from nearby area, known to the complainant. Consequently, their names were also disclosed in the F.I.R. 2. After F.I.R., for a considerable period, the present accused/ applicant remained absconding. It was subsequently, he was nabbed. Though I find charge sheet is filed and he is in custody from 22nd 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. April, 2009, however, the record, including the statement of eye-witnesses, does not support to entertain the bail application. It is accordingly rejected. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:10/08/2009. ans/2388