1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.1772 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4537 OF 2009 Nandlal T. Kaurani ..Appellant. Vs. The Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai and ors. ..Respondents. Ms. Sunita Poddar for the Appellant. Mr.J.J.Xavier for the Respndent No. 1. Mr.R.H. Mirza for the Respondent No.2. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 2nd February,2010 PC : 1 Heard both sides. 2 It is an admitted position that the appellant against whom notice under Section 351 was given and which premises order under section 351 was passed, sold the premises to third party during the pendency of the suit. While it is correct that order will attach to the premises in question. It was for the transferee to get himself transposed as 2 plaintiff or to initiate proceeding which would protect his interest. Transferee has not done so. The present appellant has no further interest in the premises. In the circumstances, first appeal will have to be dismissed. Accordingly, the first appeal is dismissed. Civil Application No.4537 of 2009 1 As the first appeal is dismissed, this civil application does not survive and the same is also dismissed. ( R.S. MOHITE, J.) `