IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 12TH AUGUST 2010 / 21ST SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 25324 of 2010(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- ABDUL KADER, S/O.MR.P.MOIDUTTY, PARAPPURATHU HOUSE, P.O.PONNYAKURUSSI, PERINTALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.A.MAJEED SRI.K.H.ASIF RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR, URBAN AFFAIRS, REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OFFICE, PALAYAM, KOZHIKODE. 3. PERINTALMANNA MUNICIPALITY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PERINTALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. MOHAMMED MUSTHAFA, S/O.MOHAMMED MUSALIYAR, THARAYIL HOUSE, MAKKARAPARAMBU P.O., PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676 507. 5. MOHAMMED RAFEEQUE, S/O.MR.SAIDALAVI, KALIPARAMBIL HOUSE, PERINTALMANNA P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679 322. GOVT. PLEADER SMT. K.R. DEEPA. R3 BY ADV. SRI. P.K. VIJAYAMOHANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 25324 OF 2010 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = DATED THIS, THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2010. J U D G M E N T The complaint raised in this writ petition is that in spite of the directions issued by this Court in Ext.P4 judgment, the Municipality is not taking any action. 2. The petitioner complains that the 4th respondent is making certain constructions violating the Building Rules. Alleging the same, he filed a writ petition earlier, which was disposed of by this Court as per Ext.P4 judgment directing the petitioner to approach the Municipality with a complaint and the Municipality was directed to take appropriate action in the matter. 3. Ext.P5 is the representation submitted by the petitioner before the Municipality, in compliance of the direction issued by this Court. It is pointed out that in spite of receipt of the same on 18.3.2010, no action has been taken by the Municipality. Learned counsel for the Municipality submitted that verification was done by the officers of the Municipality on 10.8.2010 and no violation could be found out on inspection. The Municipality will complete the enquiry with regard to the complaint and WP(C) 25324/2010 2 communicate the same to the petitioner as well as Respondents 4 and 5. 4. Therefore, there will be a direction to the Municipality that enquiry will be completed and a final decision be taken, after hearing the petitioner as well as Respondents 4 and 5, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE. KNC/-