IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc No. M-3603 of 2009 Date of decision : 10.03.2009 Gurshminder Singh @ Harry and another ....Petitioners V/s State of Punjab and another ....Respondents. BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Gagandeep Singh, Advocate for Mr. Kulbir Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sartaj Singh Gill, DAG Punjab. Mr. Yogesh Goel, Advocate for respondent No. 2. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) On the last date of hearing, notice of motion was issued only on the basis of statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners that a compromise has been arrived at between the parties. However, counsel for respondent No. 2 has put in appearance and filed a reply wherein it is stated that no compromise has been arrived at between the parties. Since notice of motion was issued only in view of the compromise (Annexure P-2) relied upon by the petitioner and the same has been denied by respondent No. 2/complainant, no cause of action survives in this petition and the same is dismissed as such. 10.03.2009 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE