IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 6TH APRIL 2009 / 16TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 11062 of 2009(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ ARAVINDKUMAR, S/O. KRISHNANKUTTY MENON AGED 35 YEARS, PALLTHEREVU, SHEKHAPURAM, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------ THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PALAKKAD. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 11062 OF 2009 (C) ===================== Dated this the 6th day of April, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that he made Ext.P1 application before the respondent seeking permission for conversion of the land mentioned therein, in terms of the provisions contained in the Kerala Land Utilization Order. That was ordered to be considered as per Ext.P2 judgment of this Court in WP(C) No.18195/08. However, the application was returned as per Ext.P3 proceedings of the respondent. Thereupon, the petitioner filed a Contempt of Court Case as COC No.1319/08. That proceedings was closed by Ext.P4, leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue his grievances against Ext.P3, and it is in these circumstances the writ petition has been filed challenging Ext.P3 and for directing that Ext.P1 be considered afresh. 2. Counsel for the petitioner relies on the judgment of this Court in Jayakrishnan v. District Collector and others (2008 (4) KHC 514) and submits that Ext.P1 application deserves to be considered on merits. 3. I am inclined to agree with the learned counsel. WPC 11062/09 :2 : 4. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing that it will be open to the petitioner to resubmit Ext.P1 application to the respondent, in which event, the respondent shall consider the matter afresh, in the light of the judgment of this Court referred to above. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 3 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp