IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 23RD DECEMBER 2011 / 2ND POUSHA 1933 WP(C).No. 35014 of 2011(B) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ S. BOSE, S/O. SANKARAN ACHARI, AGED 54 YEARS, ASARIVADAKKETHIL HOUSE, PAVUMPATHEKKU, KARUNAGAPPILLY, KOLLAM BY ADVS. SRI.C.A.CHACKO SMT.C.M.CHARISMA RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN - 695001 2. THE STATE POLICE CHIEF, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. PIN - 695001 3. THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, ALAPPUZHA. PIN - 688001 4. STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, KAYAMKULAM BRANCH, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER PIN - 690 502 R1 TO R3 BY PP SMT. JASMINE R4 BY ADV. SRI. SATHISH NINAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DCS WP(C).No. 35014 of 2011(B) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS:- EXT.P1 COPY OF REPRESENTATION DT.18.2.09 MADE BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P2 COPY OF the REPRESENTATION DT.3.10.07 MADE BEFORE CHIEF MINISTER OF KERALA. EXT.P3 COPY OF REPRESENTATION DT.10.5.2008 MADE BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P4 COPY OF THE LETTER DT.25.7.2007. EXT.P5 COPY OF THE CMP 436/10 FIELD BY PETITIONER. EXT.P6 COPY OF THE REPORT DT.2.2.2011. EXT.P7 COPY OF ORDER DT.16.4.11 IN CMP.436/10 EXT.P8 COPY OF REPRESENTATION DT.30.6.2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : - NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE DCS N.K. BALAKRISHNAN,J. ------------------------------------ W.P.C.No. 35014 of 2011 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT This petition was filed by the petitioner alleging various irregularities/illegalities in the deposits made in SBT, Kayamkulam main branch. His complaint was got enquired into by the learned Magistrate under Section 202 Cr.P.C. An Advocate was appointed to conduct the enquiry. Annexure – P4 is the report filed by the Advocate Commissioner. So many illegalities were stated to have been found-out. A crime has to be registered and proper investigation has to be conducted in respect of those illegalities, the learned counsel submits. Since a detailed investigation is required, the petitioner sought permission of the court to withdraw the complaint filed as CMP. No.436/10. Thereafter petitioner sent a complaint (Ext.P6) to the second respondent. But the learned counsel submits, so far, no action has been taken based on Ext.P6. Hence R2 is W.P.C.No. 35014 of 2011 -: 2 :- directed to consider Ext.P6 which was sent along with Ext.P8 and will take proper and effective action in the matter. This petition is disposed of accordingly. N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. smvd