IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15320 of 2011 SUCHIT KUMAR YADAV @ SUCHIT YADAV @ SUDIHIT YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.05.2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Lalan Kumar, learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 365, 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of enticing away the minor girl of the informant. Subsequently, the victim girl was recovered from the house of petitioner and in 164 Cr. P.C. statement the victim supported the accusation. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that subsequent to that the victim came to the petitioner’s house and she is residing with him as wife and 164 Cr. P.C. statement was recorded on pressure of the family members. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on provisional anticipatory bail for three months in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a 2 period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Taraiya P.S. Case No. 106 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M.Ist Class, Saran at Chapra, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner and the victim girl shall appear before the learned court below on 30.05.2011 when the victim girl admits that she has married of her own with the petitioner and residing with him then the learned court below will confirm the provisional anticipatory bail of the petitioner. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)