1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.573 OF 2011 (MEERABAI MANOHAR PATLE..VS.. DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER & OTH.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.S.S.Tambulkar, Advocate for Petitioner. Mrs. K. Deshpande, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. I.N. Choudhari, Advocate for Respondents No.4 to 8. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 09, 2011. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. On hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the impugned orders it appears that the impugned orders are just and proper and call for no interference in exercise of the writ jurisdiction. The no confidence motion has been passed against the petitioner on 24.09.2010 and five out of seven members had cast their votes against the petitioner. Since the no confidence motion was passed by the 2/3rd majority, the authorities held that the appeals filed by the petitioner were liable to be dismissed. The authorities further found that the provisions of the Act and Rules were followed and the notice of no confidence was issued by following due procedure. The authorities further found that the no confidence motion was passed against the petitioner after complying with the necessary procedure. Since no ground has been made out by the petitioner for interfering with the orders passed by the authorities, the writ petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE RR..