IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI TUESDAY, THE 8TH JUNE 2010 / 18TH JYAISTHA 1932 WA.No. 824 of 2010() -------------------- ( ORDER DATED 25-03-2010 IN I.A.NO.1180/2010 IN W.P.C.NO.30805/2005) APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENT IA.NO.1180/2010/PETITIONER IN WP(C) ------------------------------------------------------------ THE SECRETARY, KERALA KHADI & VILLAGE INDUSTRIES BOARD, VANCHIYOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.P.HARISH RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER IN IA.NO.1180/2010/RESPONDENT ------------------------------------------------------- THE SECRETARY, CANNANORE DISTRICT SHOP ESTABLISHMENT, UNION (INTUC), FORT ROAD, KANNUR-1. ADV. SRI.P.M.PAREETH FOR R1 THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: A.K.BASHEER & P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.A.No.824 OF 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 8th day of June, 2010 JUDGMENT Basheer, J. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the impugned interim order passed by the learned Judge, we do not find any reason to interfere with the said order. In our view, the contentions now sought to be urged before us have to be raised in the writ petition itself. Further, it has been brought to our notice that the appellant has already complied with the direction issued by the learned Single Judge in the impugned order to pay the wages u/s 17 B of the Industrial Disputes Act 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that unnecessary burden is being fastened on the appellant because of the delay in disposing of the writ petition. We do not find any reason why the learned Single Judge will not accede to the request, if any, that may be made by the appellant to expedite the hearing especially since the writ petition is of the year 2005. W.A.No.824/2010 2 3. It is submitted on behalf of the respondents that they have always been ready for hearing of the case. 4. In that view of the matter, writ appeal is closed with liberty to the appellant to raise all its contentions in the writ petition itself. It will be open to the appellant to make a request before the learned Single Judge for expeditious disposal of the case. Writ Appeal is closed in the above terms. A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE sv. W.A.No.824/2010 2