SWGLE gENEH 9 €/% “f” IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) w.P. s No. QOH 1 f Ramakanf Singh, Aged abouT 57 ear's, S/o Lafe Shri Jae? Singh pper Division Teacher, Governmem‘ Middle School, Thiapali, Block Korba Dis’rr‘ic’r- Kor‘ba (C.G. ) VERSUS STaTe of Chhoh‘isgarh hrough Secre‘l’ary, ribal Welfare Deparimem‘ D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Te Commissioner Tribal Welfare Deparfmenf - Ripur (C.G.) Assisianf Commissioner rible Welfare Depar’rmenT Korba (C.G.) Joinf Direcfor, Treasury, accounts and pension, Bilaspur (C.G.) lock Education Officer Kar‘iala,-'Dis‘rricf- Korba (C.6.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA y U PETITIONER Po T T h a T B Q? HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH 2 BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO‘604 OF 2011 PETITIONER Ramakant Singh ' Versus RESPONDENTS .State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India') Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Prakash Mishra, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Govt. Advocate for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 11‘“ day of February, 2011) Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was initialty appointed on a fixed pay of Rs.100l— & Rs.150/— on probation. After completion of probation period, the petitioner was granted regular pay scale vide order dated 6~7-1976 (Annexure - PM). 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue ~32 involved in the case is asto whether, the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or after completion of probation period. The issue involved. herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. & others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers were entitled to regular pay scale w.e,f. the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Supreme Court in Speciai Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers! Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from date of initial appointment. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also submits that this court, while considering the same issue in Amar Sai Ram & others v. State of Chhattisgarh & others [W.P. (S) No.4725/2006] by order dated 01.09.2006, allowed the petitioner to make a representation within a period of ten days. raising all their grievances. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation raising all the grievances and in turn, the concerned respondent is directed to decide the representation, if any, in accordance with law and the aforestated decisions, on its own merits, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, subject to verifigation of the . facts. ’1../// v/ 7. In view of foregoing, this petition is disposed of. sai— “thotri Saf‘sh K. Ag Ju5ge ,