IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 9234 of 2002 Between: M/s Navabharat Silk Industrie, B. Kothakota, Chittoor District, Represented by its Proprietor-P. Surendra Rao. ..... PETITIONER AND A.P. State Financial Corporation Limited, Tirupathi Branch represented by its Branch Manager. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus orany other appropriate writ or writs, order or direction, declaring the action of the respondent in not disposing of the representation dated 06-05-2002 of the petitioner and in seeking to evict him from the premises of the petitioner highhandedly as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and consequently to direct the respondent to forthwith dispose of the said representation before resorting to any coercive steps and to award costs. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.N.SRIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: MR.Y.N.LOHITA The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard both sides and at their request, the writ petition itself is taken up for disposal. It is submitted by the learned counsel on either side that having regard to the interim orders, dated 14-05-2002, passed by this Court in W.P.M.P.No.11414 of 2002, the respondent has considered the representation of the petitioner and also passed appropriate orders. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, nothing survives in the writ petition requiring any further adjudication and the same is liable to the dismissed. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ___________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) Date: 21-09-2004 ghn/pan To 1. The Branch Manager, A.P. State Financial Corporation Limited, Tirupathi Branch, Tirupathi 2. Two CD copies.