(1) WP 3619.2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3619 OF 2011 Prabhakar S/o Sitaram Shirsath PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and ors. RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. A.P. Madke, Advocate h/f. Mr. M.S. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. K.S. Patil, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State. Mr. L.V. Sangit, Advocate for the respondent no.4 ..... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 26TH AUGUST, 2011 ORAL ORDER: 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard by consent. 2. By way of present Petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 4.5.2011, vide which the petitioner has been directed to produce the validity certificate within the stipulated time. It is further stated that on failure to do so, the petitioner's services shall stand terminated. (2) WP 3619.2011 3. It is not in the petitioner's hands as to within how much time, the respondent no.3 should decide the claim of the petitioner. 4. In that view of the matter, Petition is disposed of with following directions:- I) Communication dated 4.5.2011 is quashed and set aside. II) Respondent no.3-Committee is directed to decide the claim of the petitioner expeditiously within a period of six (6) months from today. It is directed that no consequences shall be taken till the decision is taken by the respondent no.3-Committee on the claim of the petitioner and in the event of an adverse order being passed against the petitioner, the same shall not be given effect to for a period of four (4) weeks from the receipt of the communication. Rule made absolute accordingly. Sd/- Sd/- [M. T. JOSHI, J.] [B. R. GAVAI, J.] arp/