IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M-32858 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision:02.11.2011 Arvind Yadav . . .Petitioner Versus M/s Jain Packers . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This is a petition for pre-arrest bail in a complaint case No.533 dated 3.11.2009 registered under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (for short ‘the Act’). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he was on bail but on one date he could not appear before the Court below due to some difficulty as a result of which his bail was cancelled and his bail bonds were forfeited to the State. He had applied for anticipatory bail before the Court below which was dismissed on 28.10.2011 with the observation that if the petitioner applies for bail, the same shall be decided in accordance with law. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner would surrender before the trial Court and file bail application but the same may be ordered to be decided on the same day. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is disposed of. Petitioner is directed to surrender before the Court below on or before 7.11.2011. On his doing so, his bail application, if any filed, shall be decided on the same day, in accordance with law. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) NOVEMBER 02, 2011 JUDGE Vivek