IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12244 of 2010 SHIVAKANT JHA @ SHIVSHANKAR JHA @ GHOLTAN JHA, S/o Late Jagdish Jha. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 22.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the nature of dispute between the parties having over tones of civil dispute rather than criminal, let the petitioner above named who is in custody since 04.03.2010 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.D. Bharti, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Khagaria (or his successor) in connection with Complaint Case No. 901C of 2007 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the 2 petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)