IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 31ST MARCH 2009 / 10TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 9605 of 2009(U) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ M/S.AGE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., V/56 SINICON HOUSE, KANJIKODE WEST, PALAKKAD, KERALA INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS ASM K.GANGADHARAN. BY ADV. SRI.T.RAJESH RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA REP. BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. KERALA MEDICAL SERVICE CORPORATION LTD., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. SRI.M.AJAY,SC,KERALA MEDICAL SERV.CORPN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 9605 OF 2009 (U) ===================== Dated this the 31st day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner claims to be the manufacturer of surgical gloves. In response to tenders invited by the 2nd respondent, they submitted their tender. But however, the same was eventually rejected. It is thereupon the writ petition is filed. 2. Standing counsel appearing on instructions submit that the tenders were invited for surgical gloves conforming to IS:4148 and that the petitioner's IS certificate is in respect of disposible gloves, confirming to IS:13422. According to him, this was the reason for rejecting the tender. 3. Evidently the product offered by the petitioner is totally different from the product in respect of which tenders were invited. If that be so,the rejection of the petitioner's tender cannot be faulted. Writ petition fails and is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp