IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 26th day of August, 2009 Bail Application No. 844 of 2009 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE Sanjeet Sardar S/o Prafulla Sardar R/o Shiv Nagar, Ward No. 2, Transit Camp Rudrapur, P.S. Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar. ………… Applicant Versus tate of Uttarakhand ………… Opposite Party S Arising out of Crime No. 25 of 2009 Under Sections: 498-A, 304-B of I.P.C. & ¾ of the D.P. Act Police Station: Dineshpur District: Udham Singh Nagar. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. M.K. Ray, Advocate present for the applicant. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder present for the respondent State. Applicant Sanjeet Sardar, who is in jail in connection with Crime / F.I.R. No. 25 of 2009, relating to offences punishable under Section 498-A, 304-B of I.P.C. and one punishable under Section 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, P.S. Dineshpur, District Udham Singh Nagar, has sought his release on bail. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is brother-in- law (JETH) of the deceased. He further contended that the applicant lived separately from the deceased and her husband. It is further argued that there is no specific role assigned to the applicant in the commission of crime. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after going through the papers on record, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail. Let the applicant Sanjeet Sardar be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar. [ (Prafulla.C. Pant, J.) Dt. 26.08.2009 H.Negi