1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.4666 OF 1993 1A. Smt.Gulshan S.Khan & Ors. .. Plaintiffs. Vs. 1A. Smt.Shamshand M.Kadar & Anr. .. Defendants. WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1089 OF 2008 AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3305 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO.4666 OF 1993 Shamroz Abdul Kadar & Anr. .. Plaintiffs. Vs. Mehboob Abdul Kadar .. Defendant. Mr.Vivek B.Pandey with B.P.P.andey for the plaintiffs. Mr.A.S.Khatib for the defendants. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATED : APRIL 5, 2011. PC: 1. Shri Vivek Pandey and Shri Khatib, learned counsel for the parties have tendered the consent terms which have been signed by the respective plaintiffs and defendants as also by their advocates. The plaintiffs and defendants are personally present in the court. Plaintiff No.1(c) and Defendant No.1(b) were identified and they have respectively stated that the said S 2 consent terms are acceptable to them. 2. The suit is, therefore, disposed of in terms of the consent terms. 3. The Court Receiver to handover possession to Defendant No.1(b), who is the son of original defendant from whom the possession was taken by the Court Receiver. 4. Both the learned counsel are, however, agreeable to discharge of the Court Receiver without making accounts. The Court Receiver accordingly to stand discharge. Insofar as the amount payable to respective parties in terms of clause (i) of the consent terms is concerned, the same would be arrived at by deducting the charges of the Court Receiver. Both the counsel fairly accept the said position. 5. In view of disposal of the suit, the above motions do not survive and are disposed of as such. (R M SAVANT, J.)