IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.994 of 2010 SUJIT KUMAR SON OF RAJENDRA PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 21/01/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 324, 326 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequently, Section 302 of the I.P.C. was added. Taking into consideration the earlier dispute between the parties as also the fact that the deceased died about six days later, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 7.9.2009 and apart from one other case instituted by the deceased, there is no criminal antecedent of the petitioner, let him be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Sanjeev Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Biharsharif at Nalanda, in connection with Deep Nagar P.S. Case No. 182 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release 2 in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)