THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.110 of 2011 ORDER: This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondent herein has violated the order, dated 03.03.2010, passed in WPMP.No.6173 of 2010 in W.P.No.4796 of 2010. The petitioner is working as a Barber in Sri Kalahastheeswara Swamy Devasthanam, Sri Kalahasthi, Chittoor District. He was initially appointed on daily wages in the year 2000. Subsequently, he filed W.P.No.4796 of 2010 for regularization of his services as barber. While admitting the writ petition on 03.03.2010, this Court passed interim order in WPMP.No.6173 of 2010 directing the respondents to continue the petitioner on the same terms and conditions existing as on the date of passing of the order. In this contempt case, the allegation of the petitioner is that pursuant to the order, dated 03.03.2010, passed in WPMP.No.6173 of 2010 in W.P.No.4796 of 2010, the respondents have continued him in service, but the wages @ Rs.3,000/- per month, which he was drawing, are not being paid to him, therefore, the order, dated 03.03.2010, passed by this Court in WPMP.No.6173 of 2010 in W.P.No.4796 of 2010 is being violated. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.T.M.Prasad, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent, has submitted that the wages @ Rs.3,000/- per month payable to the petitioner for the period from 01.01.2010 to 31.01.2011, totaling Rs.39,000/-, was drawn on 10.02.2011 and paid to the petitioner. He also submitted that subsequent payment of wages is being paid to the petitioner regularly. Though there was some delay in paying the wages to the petitioner, in view of the submission of the learned Standing counsel that the entire arrears were paid to the petitioner, I deem it appropriate that it is not a fit case to proceed further. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. However, it is made clear that the petitioner shall be paid his wages regularly without any default. __________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY,J 20.06.2011 v v