IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15984 of 2010 MADHO RAM, SON OF MAHAGU RAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner is in custody since 17.2.2010 and there has been no recovery from his possession and has no criminal antecedents, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran, in Jogapatti (Shanicharij P.S. Case No. 286 of 2009) subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below 2 will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)