i€ c, .SAI 's IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P.NO. t 2-86 /2004 PETITIONER ^o^".^ ^^" -9"^ " R2SPONDSHTS s J©se Phillip / _ S/o Late phillip Joseph^ ^ ./Vv\ ..<**W Aged about 40 years, ^"..^''^y'' OccupationsAssistant Grade-II District Treasury Qfficer Jagdalpur E^© HIG-2^ Housing Colony Bodhghat^ Jagdalpur^Distt»Baster< ^^ ^<^^. - ^ VERSUS s 1) State of Chhattisgarh Through the Princip^l Secretary^ Finance Department^ DKS Bhawan^ Raipur (CG) o 2) The Cominissioner^ Treasury^Accounts & Pension^ Raipur (CG)• i) The Accountant General Chhattisgarh^ Raipur (CG)• 'The Accoants Officer^ 0/© Accountant General, Chhattisgarh^Raipur (CG) < WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE _CQNSTITUTION OF I_N D I A ^^^-'^^^^^' ^' HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Single Bench; Hon'ble Shri Satish K. A^iihotri, J. W. P»J»o.1286 pf 2004 Petitbner : Jose FhiUip Versus Respondeuts State ofChhattisgarh & ORS Shri. Kzinal Das, coiinsel for fhe Petitioner. Shri S,K. Beriwal, cozinsel for fhe respondents No. 3 aiid 4. Smt. Anju Ahiija, Deputy Govemment Advocate for the State. OISAL ORDER (5th April, 20061 The petitioner was workuig as Assistaat Grade-II aad posted at District Treasury, Jagdalpzir, Distdct Bastar. Ptirsiiaat to fhe circiilar dated 12.11.2003 (Annexure P-1), fhe petitioner appeared ia tlie Chhattisgarh Siib- ordinate Accouiits Services (part-II) Departinental exasiiHiation held bet^een 5th Janiiaiy, 2004 to 12th January, 2004. The petitioner haviag failed ia the said examiaatiou, has filed fhis petition seekiiig a direction tliat fhe respondent be directed to produce flie aaswer books of aU fhe papers of fhe petitioners for verification by oiiy competent autliority aad to get theni checked by expert to assess fhe factual position. c^'^^ The petitioner has not prayed for aay conseqiiential reUef, On qziery, as to which rule prescribed for siipply of a copy of fhe aiiswer sheet to the candidate, learaed coiinsel for fhe petitioner is iiiiable to show the. Rules, Leanied counsel fails to poiat out aay siich provisioiis, Even othen^ise fhis petition is misconceived aad frivolous. This reUef, withoiit fhere being aay factual background ailegiiig discrimiaation, arbitrariaess or unreasonableness, caiinot be graated. Accordm.gly, tlie petition is dismissed, siiraniarily at tiie adniission stage. No order as costs, Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^'.•'?~~:<--.-'S-<.'^;-^.':'~-<-''--(-?3;'5<1>^$''