Qww IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. p. (S) No. “72% /2o1o pETITIONER z/émtRubi La1 W/o s.c.B. Lal, aged about 40 years, presently posted as Lecturer at Govt. Higher Secondary School, Rajgarnar , Block Korba, District Korba (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through—Secretary, Department of School Education , Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) /2. District Education Offlcer, Korba, District Korba (C.G.) /3. Treasury Officer, Treasury Acconut and Pension, Korba, District Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 9A having passed B.Ed. examination befo. her appointment at her own cost. It is submitted that the issue inv ived in the present petition is no longer res integra and the same h s been finaliy decided by the Hon’bie Supreme Court in the case of sha Saxena Vs. State of M.?. $ Ors. 2009 (III)MPJR (SC) 59. $ourt has also taken a similar View in its order dated 6.2.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No. 625712008. Counse} for the petitioners further s 29.4.2010 passed in Writ Appeal NO. upon the judgment of the Supreme Cot (supra) and the order passed by this Cc 87/2009, directions have been issued f grant of two advance increments as issued by the State of Madhya Pradesi pleaded in the petition Counsel for the State submits ti” also be considered on the same lines. In View of abov%€hehf§etition is the respondent authorities to decide i grant of two advance increments as issued by the State of Madhya Prades pleaded in the petition within a period a [as er it is further submitted that this ubmits that the order dated 124/2009, wherein relying [rt in the case of Asha Saxena urt in another Writ Appeal No. 3r consideration of the case for per circular dated 21.9. 1974 l, after verification of the facts at case of the petitioner would disposed of with a direction to .he claim of the petitioner for per circular dated 21.9.1974 h after verification of the facts )f eight weeks from today. Wm . H?o>)6Ya-1’>~W Co WW W 200 m Em Wm WW & a m mmW WW?W 1? Fm? W11 §sW 311w 3.3.: HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. PRITINHER DIWAKER 1042-2610 Shri Rahul Jha, counsei for the petitioner. Shri Ajit Singh, Pl. for the; $tat6. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is antitled to benefit of two advance i rements account of ‘mm ‘gi 200 m mmmm mmewm 37‘W3m has not expressed any opinion y concerned wouid be at liberty ce with law‘ Sdl- ‘ ‘ Pritinker Diwaker Judge Va /,, [11??? €fi§¢§ It is made clear that this Court on merits of the case and the authorit to decide the same strictly in aocordar