IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 15601 of 2008 Between: Putta Janakamma @ Regireddy Janakamma W/o.Govardhan Reddy R/o.Miryalaguda Town & Mandal, Nalgonda District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Nalgonda District. 3 Revenue Divisional Officer, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District. 4 The Tahsildar, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned order in Proc.No.E1/5084/2008 dated 9.6.2008 passed by the 4th respondent by resumption of the land to an extent of Ac.5.00 in Sy.No. 621 situated at Miryalguda Revenue Village, Nalgonda District as illegal arbitrary and without jurisdiction and set aside the same and to pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.SUBRAHMANYAM KINTHADA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.15601 OF 2008 ORAL ORDER: As against the orders of the fourth respondent, namely, the Tahsildar, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District, resuming the land in question in favour of the Government, the petitioner states that she filed an appeal, along with stay application, before the third respondent, namely, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District, which was numbered as Appeal No.1768 of 2008, but till date no orders thereon had been passed. Pending the said appeal, the petitioner states that the respondents are trying to dispossess her from the land in question. Hence she filed the present writ petition. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, and both of them agreed for disposal of the writ petition at the stage of admission with the following directions: The third respondent, namely, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District, is directed to consider and dispose of either the main appeal or the stay application preferred by the petitioner, and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law expeditiously. Till such time, status quo obtaining as on today shall be maintained by both the parties. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J. Date: 21.07.2008 VGSR