THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P.No.2247 of 1998 Between K.Papi Reddy ..Petitioner AND The General Manager, H.M.T., MTH Division, Hyderabad ..Respondent JUDGMENT 13.3.2007 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P.No.2247 of 1998 ORDER: Inspite of posting the case under the caption ‘for dismissal’, no one appeared on behalf of the writ petitioner. In the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent, it has been asserted that immediately after the institution of the above writ petition, the writ petitioner has been paid the amount of gratuity due to him and that he has also en-cashed the cheque. Since this statement of fact has not been controverted on behalf of the writ petitioner, recording the same, I consider that the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ________________________________ NOOTY RAMAMOHAN RAO.J. 13.3.2007 psr