THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.8184 OF 2010 Dated 13th April, 2010 Between: Velpula Raju …Petitioner And The Station House Officer, Karimnagar Rural P.S., Karimnagar and another …Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : Sri T.Venkat Raju Goud Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Home The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.1, in interfering with the civil dispute pertaining to house bearing No.5-27 with the open space admeasuring Ac.0-18 guntas comprised in Survey No.492 and other agricultural lands admeasuring Ac.9-27 guntas situated at Nagunur Village and Mandal, Karimnagar District, as illegal and arbitrary. I have heard Sri T.Venkata Raju Goud, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing the respondents. The petitioner pleaded that he is the only son to his parents and as his parents sought to alienate the properties to third parties, he filed O.S.No.148 of 2006 in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Karimnagar, and obtained an order of injunction. The petitioner alleged that on a report given by his adversaries, respondent No.1 registered Crime No.78 of 2010 and since then, in the guise of registration of the said case, respondent No.1 is trying to interfere in civil disputes by calling him to Police Station and forcing him to agree for a compromise. The petitioner further pleaded that he made a representation on 23-12-2009 to respondent No.2 complaining of undue interference by respondent No.1 in the civil disputes and that no action has been taken by respondent No.2 so far on the said representation. After hearing the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, I am of the view that it is the duty of respondent No.2 to act on the petitioner’s representation. If it is found that the allegations in the said representation are correct, respondent No.2 shall take appropriate action against respondent No.1 not only to prevent him from interfering in civil disputes but also to fix liability on him departmentally. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2 to consider the petitioner’s representation, take appropriate action thereon and communicate the same to the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP No.10519 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 13th April, 2010 lur