HEGH CGURT CF CHHATTISGARH AT EELA§PUR DIVISICN EENCH CGRA‘M: HDN’BLE $HR£ H,L. D§TTU, CJ. 3: HQN’BLE $HRI V.K. SHRN’ASTAVK Ja Writ Pe€ition No. 2663 of 2W2 PETWIéNERS €. Narayan Prasad Agrawa! S/o Giridhari Lal Agrawa! Ages about 45 years, Rib MahaSati Ward, Bhatapara (C.G.) Sccupaticm : Trati'mg Bu3iriesa (Dau Min) Dilip Chhabaria, S/o Lakhan La! Chhabafia, Aged about 36 years, Rle Ba§rang Ward. Bhatapara Occupation ; Busineezs Kamai Tiwari, Sio Late Shri Shfavaa Kumar Tiwari, Aged abcui 35 years, Rio Shankar Ward, Bhatapara P)u. w VER5US RESPGNDENT$ 1. Tm $tate cf Chhamsgafh Through Lona! Welfare Depaitment D.K. Bhavan, Raipw {CA3} 2. (tweeter, Raipur 3. Ps'ariita Pandey The President. Nagar Palika, Bhatapaia 4. The Chief Minicipa! Officer, Nagar Palika, Bhatapara Pmsgznt: Dr. Shaélesh Ahuja, Gounse! for the pefitioners. Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal and $hri Saurabh Sahni, caunse! foi the :espana'em Nc.$. QRAL QRDER g?a§sea mi as“ Rpm, 2637; The foliawiiwg sfai aw‘er of‘the Court wa$ pa$sed by Hi... §a€tu, $.51 Th? petitimers are :esidents af Bhatapara. They are pubiic spirited cétizens am a‘so tax payess. (2) in this petition filed under Articles 226!227 of the Cansfitution of in§ia, ihe petiticners ailege that the Chief Mumcipw Officer and the President of ihe Municipai Councii, Bhatapara have misused the powefs conferree on them for eersonai gaine. Therefere, a request is made to enquire and to investigate into the matter and then remeve the Chief Municipal Officer anti the President ef Municipal Ceuncil. (3) in the petition 3e filed, the petitioners have not come with the fuii panicuiai‘s and details required tohinvestigate the so-cailed misuse of powers by the,Chief Municipai Gfficer and the President of the Municipal/Council. in the absence of material particulars, we cannot be directing the respondents to answer to the aiiegations made by the petitioners in this writ petition. in our opinion, the allegations made in the petition are bald and those bald aliegetions cannot be taken into e consideration by us by giving any reiief to the petitioners. , W (4) in that View of the matter, the writ petition requires to be rejected M t it, and it is rejected. Ordered accordingiy. Sdl— t ‘ ‘ V.K.Shrivastava‘ , Judge i i Sdl- chjef Justice