IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular First Appeal No. 3677 of 2006(O&M) Date of Decision: September 29, 2011. Smt. Sushil Singhal. ...... APPELLANT (s) Versus The Collector, Panchkula and others. ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Deepak Manchanda, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Addl.A.G., Haryana. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present appeal has been filed against impugned judgment dated 24.12.2005 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Panchkula vide which compensation regarding acquired land of appellant was awarded at the flat rate of `5,60,000/- per acre. The present appeal was filed for modification of the said award It has been contended by learned counsel for the appellant that vide the same notification land of other landowners was also acquired and RFA No.3677 of 2006 that some other landowners had challenged the award given by Land Acquisition Collector and the reference court had enhanced the award to the tune of `5,60,000/- per acre. It is further contended that still dissatisfied other land owners had filed appeals before this Court, which were already decided. Hence, it is contended that the present appeal is fully covered by the decision rendered in RFA No.2575 of 2002, Tara Devi v. State of Haryana decided on 27.10.2006. This plea of learned counsel for the appellant is also not disputed by learned counsel for the respondent-State. Hence, the present appeal is also disposed of in terms of decision rendered in RFA No.2575 of 2002, Tara Devi v. State of Haryana. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) September 29, 2011. JUDGE 'om’ 2