1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR C.A. 1757 of 2009 in W.P. No.1035 of 2009. (Asiatic Oxygen Ltd. ..V/s.. Mahesh Nagrani +3) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. A.R.Akre, counsel h/f Mr. Aniruddha Choube, counsel for petitioner. Ms Poonam Mihani, counsel h/f Mr. Shyam Dewani, counsel for respondent no.1. CORAM:- A.B.CHAUDHARI, J. DATED:- 18 th AUGUST, 2009. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for respondent. 2. There is no dispute that the respondents who are proposed to be served by substituted service have not appeared in the trial Court, though served. As a result, they have been already proceeded ex parte. 3. Even in this Court the learned counsel for the petitioner tried to serve them through the process of Court, but failed. The learned counsel for petitioner has therefore applied for substituted service for the above reasons. Therefore, it would be proper to grant substituted service as prayed in the present application. 4. This application is therefore allowed in 2 terms of its prayer. 5. Compliance be made on or before 13/10/2009. JUDGE nvt.