IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 6523 of 2007 Between: Dr. K.V.Chalapathi, S/o.Krishnaiah Naidu, R/o.18-1-99/, Yasoda Nagar,K.T Road, Tirupathi, Chittoor Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Tirupathi Municipal Corporation, Rep.by its Commissioner, Tirupathi, Chittoor Dist. 2 The Tirupathi Urban Development Authority, Tirupathi, rep.by its Vice- Chairman. 3 M.Veera Reddy, S/o.Chinnappa Reddy, R/o.D.No.6-7-598, Sairam Colony, Tirupathi, Chittoor Dist. 4 M.Ramachandra Reddy, S/o.M.Subba Reddy, R/o.Plot No.5,D.No.3-4,Sreenivasapuram, Tiruchanoor Road, Tirupathi, Chittoor Dist. 5 M.Jaya Rami Reddy, S/o.M.Subba Reddy, S.No .465/3, D.No.18-1-99, Yasoda Nagar,K.T.Road, Tirupathi, Chittoor Dist. 6 N.Babu Reddy, S/o. Padmanabha Reddy, S.No.465/3, D.No.18-1-99, Yasoda Nagar,K.T.Road, Tirupathi, Chittoor Dist. 7 N.Nagarjuna Reddy, S/o.N.Gangi Reddy, S.No.465/3, D.No.18-1-99, Yasoda Nagar,K.T.Road, Tirupathi, Chittoor Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent No.1&2 in not removing the structures raised in violation of the sanctioned plan in B.A.No.49/2006/G2,Dated 21-03- 2006 by the respondents No.3 to 7 at Survey No.165/3 Door No.18-1- 99,Yashodha Nagar,K.T.Road,Tirupathi,Chittoor Dist is contrary to the provisions of the A.P.Municipalities Act 1964 and consequently direct the respondents No.1&2 to demolish the illegal structures raised thereon and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.SRINIVAS DAMMALAPATI Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.P.GANGA RAMI REDDY ORDER: Mr.Dammalapati Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner filed a letter in the Registry stating that the matter has been settled out of court and thus the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. Accordingly, permission is granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. N.V.RAMANA,J Dt.1.5.2009 msv