ssp 1 WP 9775 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9775 OF 2010 Santosh Hanumant Kadam .....Petitioner versus The Commissioner, Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation and Anr. ..... Respondents Mr.S.A.Sawant, for the petitioner. Mr.D.R.More with Mr.D.B.Shinde, for respondent No.1. CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR & A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATE: 18th FEBRUARY, 2011. P.C. : 1. The services of the petitioner has been terminated by respondent No.2 on 06-08-2009 on the ground that the caste certificate of the petitioner has been invalidated by the Caste Scrutiny Committee. Initially, the order of the Caste Scrutiny Committee was challenged by the petitioner by filing Writ Petition No.3155 of 2001, which was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 06-08-2001. The petitioner thereafter filed a Civil Appeal before the Supreme Court of India, wherein the order passed by this Court has been confirmed. 2. The petitioner thereafter, filed a Writ Petition No.9229 of 2009 challenging the termination order, which was unconditionally ssp 2 WP 9775 of 2010 withdrawn by the petitioner. The order dated 6th November, 2009 withdrawing the above writ petition unconditionally, finds place at page 37 in the compilation. In spite of the same, petitioner has now filed this petition challenging the same impugned order. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner would like to make representation to the Authority in view of the subsequent Notification dated 10-08-2010. Learned counsel for the respondents states that before the said Notification came into force, the services of the petitioner were already terminated and the earlier petition was withdrawn unconditionally. In our view, the present petition is not maintainable in view of the fact that earlier writ petition was unconditionally withdrawn by the petitioner without reserving any liberty. If any representation is made by the petitioner, it is for the authority to consider the same in accordance with law and on this aspect, we are not expressing any opinion. 4. In view of what is stated above, the writ petition is disposed of. ( A.A.SAYED, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )