C.R No. 2121 of 2010 (O&M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R No. 2121 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : March 30, 2010 Smt. Raj Kaur, ...... Petitioner (s) v. Smt. Lakhwinder Kaur and others, ...... Respondent(s) *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. G.S.Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) This petition has been filed against the order dated 12.1.2010 whereby the evidence of the petitioner has been closed (except for the examination of one Hari Pal who has been bound down). Counsel for the petitioner has fairly conceded that though many opportunities were granted to the petitioner yet a perusal of the impugned order would show that it cannot be said that there was any negligence on the part of the petitioner. He further states that the matter is now fixed for 5.5.2010 for the examination of Hari Pal and that it would be in the interest of justice if the petitioner is allowed to lead her entire evidence at her own C.R No. 2121 of 2010 (O&M) ::2:: responsibility on the said date. He further states that since the respondents have not yet been called upon to lead their evidence, no prejudice would be caused to them. In my opinion, when the matter is still pending, it would be in the interest of justice to permit the petitioner to lead her entire evidence on the date fixed at her own responsibility. Ordered accordingly. It is, however, made clear that no further adjournment will be granted for the purpose. Consequently, the present petition is allowed and the impugned order is set aside. No costs. As the main petition has since been disposed of, all the pending civil miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) March 30, 2010. JUDGE `kk'