CWP No. 11536 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No. 11536 of 2009 Date of decision July 27, 2011 Saroj Bala and another .......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. V. B. Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Kirti Singh, DAG., Haryana for respondent Nos.1,3,4 and 6. Mr. Sumeet Goel, Standing counsel for CBI -respondent No.2. Mr. Mohd. Yousuf, Advocate for respondent No.5. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. Learned counsel for the State states that a supplementary challan has been filed including the offence under Section 376 IPC against the accused. The grievance of the petitioner is that charge under Section 302 has not been added and the petitioner has not been arrested yet. It appears that the accused has been released on bail already. It is directed that the police shall apply to the Court for cancellation of the bail and if, such an application is filed the same will be CWP No. 11536 of 2009 2 considered by the Judge before whom the case is pending. Any grievance of the petitioner about the commission of higher offence for which the accused has still not been charged will be a matter that will be taken up before the Court before whom the case is pending and when appropriate materials are brought for amending the charge sheet before the Trial Court, the same shall be considered by the Court. 2. I do not find that any further directions are necessary. The writ petition is disposed of. 3. Copy of the order be given dasti to the State counsel under the signatures of the Reader attached to the Bench. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE July 27, 2011 archana