BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT ORGANISED BY THE HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : SHRI.JACOB VARGHESE (SR.ADVOCATE) & SMT.K.SREELATHA DEVI (RETD. DIST.JUDGE) TUESDAY, THE 6TH JULY 2010 / 15TH ASHADHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 3647 of 2010() PETITIONERS: 1. RAJKUMAR AGARWAL, AGED 28 YEARS, S/O. RAMESHCHAND AGARWAL, NO.61, UDAYA NAGAR 4TH LANE, KALOOR, KATHRUKKADAVU CROSS ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 017. 2. RAMESH CHAND AGARWAL, AGED 60, S/O. R.P.AGARWAL, NO.61, UDAYA NAGAR 4TH LANE, KALOOR. 3. SHARADA DEVI, AGED 52, W/O. RAMESH CHAND AGARWAL, NO.61, UDAYA NAGAR 4TH LANE, KALOOR. BY ADV. MR.S.SUDHEESHKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): 1. S.I. OF POLICE, E.T.NORTH POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM. 2. SANDHYA MITAL, AGED 23 YEARS, D/O. SUNILKUMAR MITAL, 28/43 B, GANDHI NAGAR, G.N.MILL POST, COIMBATORE-641 029. 3. SUNILKUMAR MITHAL, 28/43 B, GANDHI NAGAR, G.N.MILL POST, COIMBATORE-641 029. 4. MAYAVATHY MITHAL, W/O. SUNILKUMAR MITHAL, -28/43 B, GANDHI NAGAR, G.N.MILL POST, COIMBATORE-641 029. 5. MR.PUSHKAR DATT GUPTA @ P.D.GUPTA, MOORTHY NIVAS, 8/2357, T.D.EAST ROAD, NEAR NAM HOSPITAL, COCHIN-2. ADV.SRI.BABU KARUKAPADATH FOR R5 SMT.M.A.VAHEEDA BABU FOR R5 SRI.JAGAN GEORGE FOR R5 SRI.P.G.PRAMOD FOR R5 SRI.KANDAMPULLY RAHUL FOR R5 THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR DETERMINATION BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT ON 06/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: SRI.P. JACOB VARGHESE (SENIOR ADVOCATE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA) AND SRI.K.SREELATHA DEVI (RETD. DISTRICT JUDGE) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bail Application NO.3647 OF 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2010 PROCEEDINGS The petitioner Mr.Rajkumar Agarwal, his father Ramesh Chand Agarwal, brother Arunkumar Agarwal are present along with Adv.Mr.S.Sudheeshkumar. Mrs.Sandhya Mital, her mother Mrs.Mayavathy Mithal, father Mr.Sunil Kumar Mital and the infant child are also present along with Adv.Mr.Babu Karukappadath. The subject matter is a family dispute between the petitioner and his wife Mrs.Sandhya. The young married couple has a small baby. It appears that the dispute can be attempted to be resolved if they are allowed to be together without any interference from any of the family members. They were instructed to remain together alone in the Adalat premises for about 45 minutes and discussed. After prolonged discussions, for resolving the dispute between the husband and wife, they have agreed to reside together at Nagarcovil where the petitioner is working. It is agreed that none of the parents or relatives will in any manner interfere in their affairs for 3 months and would earnestly make all attempts to settle their disputes to have a peaceful life. B.A NO.3647/2010 2 With the object of achieving such settlement, as a first step, the parties agreed to live together from 11.07.2010. The respondent Mrs.Sandhya is presently living her parents at Coimbatore. The petitioner agreed to go to Coimbatore on 11.07.2010 at 10 a.m to her parents house where Mrs.Sandhya and child are residing along with his advocate Mr.S.Sudheeshkumar. He agreed to take his wife and child to Nagarcoil by the evening train. Mrs.Mayavathy, mother of Mrs.Sandhya agreed to make arrangements for their return trip to Nagarcoil by the evening train. The petitioner agreed to provide his wife and child the best care and protection and the respondent Mrs.Sandhya agreed to fully co-operate with the petitioner. The parties further agreed that all the remaining disputes including that of gold ornaments can be discussed in the next date of posting before this Adalat. The case is posted to 11.08.2010. P. JACOB VARGHESE (SENIOR ADVOCATE) K.SREELATHA DEVI (RETD. DISTRICT JUDGE) ss/.