MP 1 ABA886_11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 886 OF 2011 1. Basavraj I. Biraidar 2. Rudrappa K. Biraidar ... Applicants Versus State of Maharashtra and another ... Respondents Mr. S. A. Ingawale, Advocate for Applicants. Shri. Shinde, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM : J. H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 21ST OCTOBER 2011 P. C. : Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The applicants seek anticipatory bail in Crime No.56 of 2011 registered with Umadi Police Station, Sangli for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 201, 506 and 143 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. On perusal of the F.I.R., it reveals that the allegation of murder is only against one Siddappa, while, the allegation against the present applicants is only in respect of causing disappearance of evidence of murder which is an offence punishable under Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code. That offence is bailable, and therefore, the application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 is not tenable in law. 4. With this clarification, the application stands disposed of. (J. H. BHATIA, J)