IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY THE THIRD DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND AND NINE : PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA AS.No. 1375 of 1990 (Appeal under Section 96 of CPC against the Judgment of the Court of the Subordinat Judge, Vizianagaram passed in OS.No. 91 of 1981 dated 22-01-1987.) Between:- Andhra Pradesh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Vizianaggaram, Represented by the District Manager. ..Appellant/Plaintiff. AND Polisetty Sambamurthy S/o. Polisetty Gunnayya, Merchants and Commission Agent, Bobbili. ..Respondent/Defendant. The Appeal coming on for hearing upon perusing the petition and Grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N. Subba Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant and of Sri G. Sai Narayana Rao, the learned counsel representing Sri G. Venkateswara Rao, the learned counsel representing the respondent/defendant, the Court made the following ORDER: “Heard Sri N. Subba Reddy, the learned Senior Counsel representing the appellant/plaintiff-Corporation and Sri G. Sai Narayana Rao, the learned counsel representing S.G. Venkateswara Rao, the learned counsel representing the respondent/defendant. As can be seen from the judgment, the evidence of P.Ws 1 to 4 and D.W.1 nd also Exs.A.1 to A.55 and Ex.B.1 had been referred to and discussed. After hearing the learned counsel on record, on verification, it is found that though the record had been called for at the earliest point of time till now it is stated that the records had not been received. It is also stated by Sri N. Subba Reddy, the learned Senior Counsel and also Sri G. Sai Narayana Rao, the learned counsel representing the respondent/defendant that the matter, in fact, had been argued before another learned Judge and this fact that the documents had not been received had been brought to the notice of this Court. When that being so, it is needless to say that the Registry should have taken effective steps to see that the records are brought before this Court at the earliest point of time. It is also brought to the notice of this Court by Sri G. Sai Narayana Rao, the learned counsel for respondent/defendant that on the last occasion while arguing the matter, it was detected that the documents shown as exhibits marked in the appendix of evidence are not tallying with the references made in the judgment. The same is also to be verified and hence, Office is also directed to verify this confusion by checking up the records relating to O.S.No. 90 of 1981 on the file of the Subordiante Judge, Vizianagaram. Let the Registry take immediate and effective steps in this regard. List this matter after one week.” ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Contd..2… - 2 - To 1. The Subordinate Jude, Vizianagaram. 2.Polisetty Sambamurthy S/o. Polisetty Gunnayya, Merchants and Commission Agent, Bobbili, Vizianagaram District. 3.The Registrar, Judicial, High Court of A.P., Hydrabad(for kind perusal) 4.The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. 5. One CC to Sri N. Subba Reddy, Advocate(OPUC). 6.One CC to Sri Sai Narayana Rao, Advocate(OPUC). 7.One CC to Sri G. Venkateswara Rao, Advocate(OPUC). 8.One Spare copy. TKK HIGH COURT PSN.J DATED: 03-06-2009. ORDER AS.NO. 1375 OF 1990. D I R C T I O N DRAFTED BY TKK DT.06-06-2009. HIGH COURT PSN.J DATED: 03-06-2009. Note :- List this matter after one week. ORDER AS.NO. 1375 OF 1990. D I R C T I O N