A \ 34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRLM.C. 3933/2010 CHHUTKAN SHARMA & ORS. Petitioners Through l^r.Suresh Bharti, Advocate with Petitioners in person versus STATE & ANR Respondents Through i^r.l^i.N.Dudeja, APP for R-1. Mr.R.S.i^ishra, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAIvj.- HON'BLE |V1S. JUSTICE HljviA KOHLI ORDER % 20.12.2010 1. The present petition is filed by the petitioners under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. praying inter alia for quashing of Criminal Complaint No. 4858/1/10 filed by respondent No.2/complainant, against the petitioners under Sections 307/323/341/506/34 IPC registered with PS Palam Village, pending in the, Court of the learned Miyi, Dwarka. 2. It is stated by the counsel for the petitioners that the basis CRLI^l.C. 3933/2010 Page No.l of 4 Signing Date:05.08.2024 16:58:50 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified of the FIR is a complaint made by respondent No.2 on 16.9.2009 against the petitioners, basis of which was in fact an underlying dispute between the parties with regard to the tenancy of one room, taken by the petitioners of the first floor of the premises, owned by respondent No.2 bearing No. RZ-25C/3, Gali No.31-32, Indra Park. 3. Counsel for the petitioners states that on 7.9.2010, during the hearing of an anticipatory bail application filed by the petitioners in respect of FIR lodged by respondent No.2, this Court directed the parties to explore the possibility of arriving at a negotiated settlement. Pursuant to the same, the parties appeared before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre and arrived at a settlement, as recorded in the Report dated 15.9.2010 submitted by the learned Mediator. 4. It is submitted by the counsels for the parties that both the parties have resolved their inter se disputes and the petitioners are stated to have vacated the tenanted premises. Both the parties have agreed to withdraw all the complaints filed against each other. Hence the present petition. 5. Respondent No.2/complainant is present in court and is duly represented by his counsel. He confirms the fact that he has arrived at the aforesaid settlement of his own free will and volition and CRL.M.C. 3933/2010 Page No.2 of 4 A without any undue influence or coercion fronn any quarter. He further confirms that he has signed the Settlement Report dated 15.9.2010(Annexure B) as placed on record and that the petitioners have vacated the premises and further that he is left with no other pending dispute against them. 6. Learned APP for the State submits that the matter is at the stage of investigation. However, in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, he has no objection to the prayer made in the present petition being allowed. 7. This Court has heard the counsels for the parties. In view of the submission made by respondent No.2/complainant and in view of the fact that the parties have arrived at a settlement of their own free will and volition and without any undue influence or coercion from any quarters, no useful purpose will be served by proceeding further with the aforesaid criminal complaint and the proceedings arising therefrom. 8. Accordingly, the prayer made in the petition is allowed. Criminal Complaint Case No. 4858/1/10 filed by respondent No.2/complainant, against the petitioners under Sections CRLIvj.C. 3933/2010 Page No.3 of 4 \ > A'. 4. "V 307/323//341/506/34 IPG registeredwith PS Palam Village, pending in the Court of the learned MM, Dwarka is quashed. 9. The petition is disposed of. File be consigned to the record room. DECEMBER 20, 2010 mk HIMA KOHLI,J CRL.M.C. 3933/2010 Page No.4 of 4