Crl. Misc. No. M-35633 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-35633 of 2011 Date of Decision: November 28, 2011 Sukhbir Singh @ Soki …..Petitioner Vs. U.T. Chandigarh …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.Paramjit Batta, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioner seeks the concession of regular bail inter-alia on the ground that the prosecutrix has not levelled any allegations of rape against the petitioner while appearing as a witness. It has been informed that the statement of the prosecutrix has been recorded on November 8, 2011. The earlier petition for bail filed by the petitioner was dismissed on April 27, 2011. On the basis of the statement of the prosecutrix recorded on November 8, 2011, it is claimed Crl. Misc. No. M-35633 of 2011 [2] that the petitioner has not been attributed any part in the story of rape of prosecutrix. The recording of statement of the prosecutrix on November 8, 2011 is a new circumstance for the petitioner to again approach the trial Court for regular bail as the first application for bail was dismissed on April 27, 2011. Relegating the petitioner to avail the remedy of approaching the trial Court again on the basis of alleged favourable statement of the prosecutrix, this petition is disposed of. It is observed that in case the petitioner moves an application for regular bail on the basis of the evidence of the prosecution recorded after the dismissal of his application for bail by the trial Court, it will be open to the trial Court to reconsider the fresh circumstances and grant the concession of bail in case the circumstances so warrant. November 28, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE