IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.574 of 2011 Mukesh Mandal son of Indradeo Mandal under the guardianship of Indradeo Mandal, resident of village- Fatehpur, P.S.- Jhajha, District- Jamui. .. Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar .. Opp. Party. ----------- 4. 30.09.2011 The accused- petitioner has preferred this revision application under Section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 against the judgment and order dated 22.2.2011 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Jamui in Cr. (Juvenile) Appeal No. 3 of 2011 by which the order dated 13.1.2011 passed by the learned Juvenile Justice Board, Jamui in G.R. No. 16 of 2010 arising out of Jhajha P. S. Case No. 3 of 2010 under Sections 376(G) I.P.C. has been confirmed and the appeal has been dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been declared a juvenile and his prayer for bail has been rejected by the Juvenile Justice Board. Thereafter, the petitioner filed Cr. (Juvenile) Appeal No. 3 of 2011 which has been dismissed by the impugned order on the ground that the petitioner has committed heinous crime. He has 2 further submitted that in similar facts and circumstances, co-accused- Parmanand Mandal has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 15.7.2011 passed in Cr. Revision No. 340 of 2011. He has also submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 31.10.2010. His father will take care of him. Learned A.P.P. for the State could not controvert the contention of the petitioner while opposing the prayer. After hearing learned counsel for both the parties and on perusal of material on record as also the report of Probation Officer vide Letter No. 45 dated 5.9.2011, it appears that there is no material on record to show that the release of the petitioner will bring him into association of any known criminals or his release would defeat the ends of justice. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the facts and circumstances stated above, in my opinion, the impugned order is not fit to be sustained. It is set aside. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to 3 the satisfaction of learned Juvenile Justice Board, Jamui in connection with G. R. No. 16 of 2010 arising out of Jhajha P. S. Case No. 3 of 2010 with following conditions;- (i) One of the bailors must be the father of the petitioner. (ii) The father of the petitioner will take care of the petitioner and he will produce the petitioner in the Court if and when required. In case of absence on two consecutive dates, his bail bonds would be liable to be cancelled. (iii) The petitioner will not indulge himself in similar or in any other offence. (iv) In case of violation of the terms and conditions of bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the learned Juvenile Justice Board and he will be liable to be taken into custody. In the result, this revision application is allowed. Kanchan (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)