IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.19101 OF 2009 DATE OF DECISION: MARCH 18 ,2011 Sunita Mukhra .....Petitioner VERSUS Haryana Urban Development Authority, Panchkula and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Kamal Satija, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Bansal, Advocate, for the respondents. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. Learned counsel for the respondents has placed before me a communication dated 16.3.2011 whereby HUDA has taken a decision to allot an alternative plot of 14 marla category within Sector 64, Faridabad, in lieu of plot No.356, Sector 64 out of available unallotted vacant plots. The specific plot to be allotted shall be determined through draw of lots. Allotment shall be governed by the relevant provisions of HUDA Act, 1977, rules, regulations framed thereunder and further policy guidelines dealing with exchange of plot. Obviously, the petitioner would be allotted plot on the same terms and conditions as were applicable when the plot was originally allotted to her. The communication is kept on record. The writ petition is, therefore, rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. March 18,2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE