In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh R. F. A No. 154 of 2009 (O&M) Smt. Saroj Bala ... Appellant vs State of Haryana .... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Anuj Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. D. D. Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal J. The landowner is in appeal before this court against the award of the learned court below passed under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act') seeking enhancement of compensation for the acquired land. Brief facts of the case are that vide notification dated 16.3.1999, issued under Section 4 of the Act, land situated in Village Saketri, Hadbast No. 376, Tehsil and District Panchkula was acquired by the State of Haryana for development and utilisation as residential, commercial, institutional, recreational area in Sectors 1, 2, 3, 5B, 5C and 6, Mansa Devi Complex, Panchkula. The Land Acquisition Collector assessed the market value at Rs. 9,00,000/- per acre for Chahi Abi-barani land; Rs. 4,70,000/- per acre for Banjar land and Rs. 2,30,000/- per acre for Gair Mumkin kind of land. The landowners/claimants feeling dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Collector, filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned court below determined the market value of the acquired land at Rs. 418/- per square yard. Learned counsel for the parties submitted that the issue involved in the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of this court in RFA No. 3008 of 2008– Smt. Poonam vs State of Haryana and another decided on 25.2.2009, whereby the appeals arise out of the same acquisition have been decided and the matter was remitted back for fresh consideration. For the reasons recorded in Smt. Poonam's case (supra), the appeal is disposed of in the same terms. The parties are directed to appear before the learned District Judge, Panchkula, on 5.6.2010. The learned District Judge will club the reference with other cases earlier referred back by this Court. 13.5.2010 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge