—-: fe I.JX-A^ ..- m^ ^T^ q.y rrirq 9-waT^ 3iTE%?or H^ BTcft-g^ <<^NKItKW«^«N'<*l<^i•N< <ffr <W«N«t^<N«N'-NtNN»^IN^^Nt ^toB^ «tl^-<tNNiul—^ NlN <iiu»<NdlKNl(' 311-9-d8T M%^2000 &.79<5^W^r STfT^T pT^ 9Ti ?si.?ir?»^g fqT^f^T ^' T^T?^ aTt%rrt,8i^g%?- — T^FS rg^ ?gT?^ ^rlt, ^•^•W9iT ^Tci 2* ^erTiI, T^T?^ Nr? »TT<TTQ sc geEi TqT^aT w'TgrF^ siN^rrt fsiir Err^fl^' q< ^ Tq gT ^ TqTFt-9 siTygiTTt m^y 5* T5}cJT£H-?f, TuiciT •ui'q^lf HTdtW grr9;i ~- arN^ a;fTi^wl» ar^-T q^ tf^Q WH t9 ir9"*Hu!Er prraT^ aW^sm 1991 4 r-f" :-HC-22 ^- 3n^T^T fc-licb 3T(^T 5h^ich Trffd Turnane •2 ~3~oE[ ^ffqi^R, ^tfkrtT%. iQ)«yii1H(l< siri^ XRT^ \-j.^.)^.3,^<S~V'^n, 200 ^i^^r^w^ •f^E^T" W^T ^n^R: Trf^T SS : l-ioo'ble Shri SVEajiiiidra SVIohaii Shril^astava,J» 1^) 16-03-2010 Shri S. S. Rajput, counse! forthe p| Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Deputy Govt. A( With the consent of learned couns^ Qrievance ofthe petitioner as set his duty after a long period of absence though the period of absence prior to petitioner was entitled for payment of inc|i join duties and worked on the post The the number of representations have alrea< Respondents have not fiied their r^ placed before this Court to show that tt decided bythe concerned respondent autlji In this view of the matter, no usefi|i matter pending. Interest ofjustice would| Director, Health Setvices, State and take appropriate decision in the m| decided. The petitioner would be at continuation of representations made !t would be c'pen for the petition^ avaitabte to him under the law, in the evej made c!ear that this Court has not expre^ and the concerned authority shall take de<f With the aforesaid direction, the p4 iofChhatti^garh earller. CM^i<rt<i1rl 'W^f ^ ft^t <p5l^l< ^ 3Tf^PT 3T7^T ^titioner. Ivocateforthe State. forthe parties, the matter is heard finally. |ut in the petition is that he hadjoEned back |n 10-02-1993 and he was aiiowed to join P-02-1993 has been treated as dies non, frements from the date he was allowed to tverments made in the petition sho\A/s that |y been made to the respondents. sply in this case nor any material has been |e case of the petitioner has been finally lorities. il purpose would be served in keeping the be sen/'ed, if a direction is issued to the to considerthe case ofthe petitioner rtter, if the matter has not aiready been iberty to fiie a fresh representation in &r to take recourse to such remedy as is it, his grievance remains unredressed. it is ised any opinion on the merits ofthe case ;ision in accordance wfth law. :tition is finafly disposed of Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Jude i-n-^ -^f7^-(