IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.532 of 2007 SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 4. 10.9.2008. N.H./ This application has been filed against the order dated 6.1.2007 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Purnea in Misc. Case No.34 of 2005 thereby the petitioner has been directed to pay interim maintenance of Rs.1,000/- per month to the opposite party no.2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Perused the impugned order. The only submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is no specific finding with regard to the income of the petitioner and without giving such finding, the court below has wrongly awarded to pay maintenance at the rate of Rs.1,000/- per month. Considered the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the grounds mentioned in the impugned order. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere in the impugned order. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. However, the court below is directed to dispose of the main application within three months of receipt of this order. ( Ghanshyam Prasad )