S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO.3667/2006 Date : 05.09.2006 HON'BLE MR. SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. J.R. Choudhary for the applicants. Mr. Vishnu Kachhawaha, Public Prosecutor for State. I have heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the impugned order. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, it appears that there had been transaction between the applicant and complainant and in that regard some dispute arose between them as is pointed out by the learned Public Prosecutor. It is also submitted that vehicle is financed and in relation to it complainant did not make payment towards instalments which created dispute between the applicant and the complainant. Taking into consideration overall facts and circumstances of the present case, I deem it just and proper to grant anticipatory bail to the applicants. Accordingly, it is directed that in the event of arrest of applicants (1) Sohan Lal son of Jai Narayan (2) Narsingh Ram son of Kana Ram and (3) Jagdish son of Lodu Ram by I.O./S.H.O. in FIR No.32/2006 P.S. Rol, they shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- alongwith two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of Investigating Officer on the following conditions:- (i)That they shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii)That they shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and; (iii)That they shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J. vijayant