CCP No.48/2009 Page 1 of 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CCP No.48/2009 in CS(OS) No.180/1997 % Date of Decision: 30.03.2009 The Vaish Co-Operative Adarsh Bank Ltd …. Petitioner Through Ms.Gagan Gupta, Advocate. Versus Sh.V.K.Soin …. Respondent Through Ms.Rekha Palli, Advocate. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR 1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? YES 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NO ANIL KUMAR, J. * The learned counsel for the respondent states that the cheque could not be encashed on account of some doubt about the signatures of the judgment debtor raised by the bank without intimation to the judgment debtor. The learned counsel has also produced a copy of the letter from the bank dated 28th March, 2009 stipulating that M/s.Pushpa Builder is maintaining the current account with the branch. The said cheque No.6640 for Rs.7 lakhs issued in favour of Vaish Cooperative Adarsh Bank Ltd was returned earlier on account of signatures not tallied. The bankers have now stated that the same will be cleared in case it is CCP No.48/2009 Page 2 of 2 presented. The letter is taken on record. The petitioner is permitted to encash the cheque. Considering the facts and circumstances, there is no willful or deliberate violation of any of the orders passed by this Court. The contempt petition is, therefore, dismissed and the contempt notice issued to the respondent/contemnor is withdrawn. The petition is disposed of. MARCH 30, 2009 ANIL KUMAR, J. “K”