1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.09.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH Crl.O.P.(MD).No.3228 of 2011 And Crl.O.P.(MD).No.11037 of 2010 And M.P.(MD).Nos. 1 to 3 of 2011 Crl.O.P.(MD).No.3228 of 2011: 1. Zarina Begum 2. M.Mathina Begum 3. A.Shirajudeen 4. P.Jamal Maideen 5. Maimoon Beevi ...Petitioners/Accused Nos. 2 to 6 -Vs- 1. State rep. by The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station Thirupparankundram Madurai District Crime No.23/2009 ...1st Respondent/ Complainant 2. M.Sabeeka Begum ...2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant Crl.O.P.(MD).No.11037 of 2010: 1. Zarina Begum 2. Mainoon Beevi 3. P.Jamal Mohamed 4. M.Mathina Begum 5. S.Shrajudeen 6. M.Sikkandar Hussain ...Petitioners/ Respondents -Vs- 1. Sabeeka Begum ...Respondent/ Petitioner PRAYER IN CRL.O.P.(MD).No. 3228/2011: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records pertaining to C.C.No. 428 of 2010 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai and quash the proceedings against the petitioners herein and the co-accused. PRAYER IN CRL.O.P.(MD).No. 11037/2010: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records pertaining to Crl.M.P.No. 3181 of 2010 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai, Madurai District and quash the proceedings as against the petitioners herien. For Petitioners in both O.P.s: Mr.Siva Ayyappan For 1st Respondent in Crl.O.P.No. 3228/2011 : Mr.K.V.Rajarajan Government Advocate (Crl. Side) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 C O M M O N O R D E R When the matter is taken up today, the learned counsel for the petitioners and the de-facto complainant submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties. The de-facto complainant is also present before the Court. 2. Two compromise memos supported by the affidavits have been filed, in which it has been stated that there is no objection for quashing the proceedings in view of the compromise. 3. Taking note of the nature allegation and the relationship between the parties and also taking note of the submissions made, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose would be serve by keeping the proceedings. 4. Accordingly, the proceedings in C.c.No. 428 of 2010 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai, Madurai District and Crl.M.P.No. 3181 of 2010, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai, Madurai District, are quashed and the Criminal Original Petitions are allowed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs. SD/- Assistant Registrar(CO) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) To 1. The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai. 2. The Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai. 3. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai. 4. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station Thirupparankundram, Madurai District 5. The Additional Public Prosecutor,Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai vsg Crl.O.P.(MD).No.3228 of 2011 And Crl.O.P.(MD).No. 11037 of 2010 30.09.2011 TR: 28.10.2011 : 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/