IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45918 of 2009 PAPPU SINGH, SON OF ADITYA SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 08/03/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302/34of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The present case is of the year 2002 and even though the petitioner was named in the First Information Report, he chose not to appear before the Court and, therefore, the Government had announced a reward of Rs. 50,000/- for his arrest. It is only thereafter that the petitioner was arrested. Taking into consideration the aforementioned facts I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner on merits for the present. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, he may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. The trial court will ensure that the petitioner’s case is not separated to take benefit of the present order and the entire case of all the accused persons is committed and charge is framed against all of them simultaneously. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)