lpa73.08 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD LETTERS PAPTENT APPEAL NO. 73 OF 2008 Prakash Laxman Daware .. APPELLANT VERSUS Amrutvahini Sheti & Shikshan Vikas Sanstha & another .. RESPONDENTS Mr. L.V. Sangit, advocate for the appellant. Mr. R.L. Kute, advocate holding for Mr. R.N. Dhorde, advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2. WITH LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 74 OF 2008 Balasaheb Yadav Sabale .. APPELLANT VERSUS Amrutvahini Sheti & Shikshan Vikas Sanstha & another .. RESPONDENTS Mr. L.V. Sangit, advocate for the appellant. Mr. R.L. Kute, advocate holding for Mr. R.N. Dhorde, advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2. lpa73.08 2 WITH LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 75 OF 2008 Balaaheb Vitthalrao Deshmukh .. APPELLANT VERSUS Amrutvahini Sheti & Shikshan Vikas Sanstha & another .. RESPONDENTS Mr. L.V. Sangit, advocate for the appellant. Mr. R.L. Kute, advocate holding for Mr. R.N. Dhorde, advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2. WITH LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 76 OF 2008 Balasaheb Laxman Kolhapure .. APPELLANT VERSUS Amrutvahini Sheti & Shikshan Vikas Sanstha & another .. RESPONDENTS Mr. L.V. Sangit, advocate for the appellant. Mr. R.L. Kute, advocate holding for Mr. R.N. Dhorde, advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2. lpa73.08 3 WITH LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 77 OF 2008 Bhagwat s/o Shankar Wakchaure .. APPELLANT VERSUS Amrutvahini Sheti & Shikshan Vikas Sanstha & another .. RESPONDENTS Mr. L.V. Sangit, advocate for the appellant. Mr. R.L. Kute, advocate holding for Mr. R.N. Dhorde, advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2. WITH LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 78 OF 2008 Ramdas Namdeo Kanawade .. APPELLANT VERSUS Amrutvahini Sheti & Shikshan Vikas Sanstha & another .. RESPONDENTS Mr. L.V. Sangit, advocate for the appellant. Mr. R.L. Kute, advocate holding for Mr. R.N. Dhorde, advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2. lpa73.08 4 WITH LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 79 OF 2008 Gorakshnath Gopinath Mavdik .. APPELLANT VERSUS Amrutvahini Sheti & Shikshan Vikas Sanstha & another .. RESPONDENTS Mr. L.V. Sangit, advocate for the appellant. Mr. R.L. Kute, advocate holding for Mr. R.N. Dhorde, advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2. WITH LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 80 OF 2008 Nanasaheb Bhagwat Wakchaure .. APPELLANT VERSUS Amrutvahini Sheti & Shikshan Vikas Sanstha & another .. RESPONDENTS Mr. L.V. Sangit, advocate for the appellant. Mr. R.L. Kute, advocate holding for Mr. R.N. Dhorde, advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2. lpa73.08 5 WITH LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 81 OF 2008 Vilas Tulshiram Kasar .. APPELLANT VERSUS Amrutvahini Sheti & Shikshan Vikas Sanstha & another .. RESPONDENTS Mr. L.V. Sangit, advocate for the appellant. Mr. R.L. Kute, advocate holding for Mr. R.N. Dhorde, advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2. WITH LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 82 OF 2008 Dattatraya Niranjan Bhandurge .. APPELLANT VERSUS Amrutvahini Sheti & Shikshan Vikas Sanstha & another .. RESPONDENTS Mr. L.V. Sangit, advocate for the appellant. Mr. R.L. Kute, advocate holding for Mr. R.N. Dhorde, advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2. ===== lpa73.08 6 CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE & R.M. BORDE, JJ. DATE : 6 th JANUARY, 2011 PER COURT : 1 This group of Letters Patent Appeals challenges the interim order dated 25 th March, 2008 passed by the learned Single Judge in a group of writ petitions whereby the order passed by the College Tribunal has been stayed. By that order, the College Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellants, setting aside the order of their termination and directing respondent no. 1 to re-instate them with backwages and other benefits. 2 We have perused the order dated 25 th March, 2008 passed by the learned Single Judge. It is a well reasoned order and has been passed after hearing both the sides. For the reasons stated in the order and more particularly in paragraphs 4 and 5 thereof, in our opinion, it deserves no interference by this court. We are also prima facie satisfied that the Tribunal exceeded the jurisdiction vested in it under section 60 of the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994. 3 In the circumstances, all the appeals are dismissed. It is open to the lpa73.08 7 appellants to apply for fixing early date of hearing of the petitions. If any such application is made by the appellants, learned Single Judge is requested to consider the same sympathetically. ( R. M. BORDE ) ( D.B. BHOSALE ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb