IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1521 of 2010 SURAJ NARAIN SINGH, S/O- Late Jagdeo Singh, R/O- Village- Berkup, P.S.- Darihat, District- Rohtas :--- Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Additional District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram. 3. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Rohtas at Sasaram. 4. The Anchal Adhikari, Dehari, District- Rohtas. 5. Radha Mohan Singh. 6. Nagina Singh. 7. Haribansh Singh. 8. Saribjit Singh. All S/O- Late Ramdeo Singh, R/O- Village- Kusahi, P/O- Sisrita, P.S.- Nokha, District- Rohtas. 09. Harinarain Singh, S/O- Late Jagdeo Singh, R/O- Village- Kusahi, P.O.- Sisrita, P.S.- Nokha, District- Rohtas :--- Respondents. ----------- 2. 29.01.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. From the orders of the appellate/revisional court it is evident that the mutation order passed in favour of the petitioner has been set aside for the reason that petitioner is not in possession of the lands in-question, although he claims the lands in-question on the basis of a sale deed. 3. This writ application is, accordingly, permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Civil Court of competent jurisdiction for declaration of title and recovery of possession of the lands in-question. 4. With the liberty aforesaid, this writ application is dismissed as withdrawn. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)