Crl.Misc.73980-81 of 2006 and Crl.Rev.No.1626 of 2003 **** Present: Mr.RS Athwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Mukesh Kaushik, DAG, Punjab. Mr.S.S.Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr.Vivek Goyal, Advocate for respondent No.3. … Crl.Misc.No.73980-81 of 2006 Copy of the order and decree dated 6.6.2005, Statement of Ushapal plaintiff dated 6.6.2005 and Statement of Smt.Debo-defendnat No.6 dated 6.6.2005 attached with the Crl.Misc.Application are taken on record. Crl. Misc.Application stands disposed of. Crl.Rev.No.1626 of 2003 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the compromise entered into between the parties on 6.6.2005 on the basis of which the judgment and decree dated 6.6.2005was passed by learned Addl.Civil Judge (Sr.Divn.) Faridkot, the petitioner who is even otherwise an old and handicapped person, does not press the petition. It is stated that State has not filed any appeal against the judgment and decree dated 6.6.2005 passed by Civil Judge (Sr.Divn.), Faridkot. In view of the above, Crl. Revision petition is dismissed. [S.S.Saron] Judge 20.07.2007 sd