1 325.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.325 OF 2011 Navin Ganesh Kacherla & Anr. ...Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Edith Dey for Petitioner. Mr.D.P.Adsule, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1. Mr.Asif Singh for Respondent No.2. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED:- FEBRUARY 11, 2011. P.C. 1. For the reasons mentioned in our reasoned order dated 3rd February, 2011 in Writ Petition No.995 of 2010 in the case of Nari Motiram Hira vs. Avinash Balkrishnan & Anr., even this Petition deserves to be allowed. Inasmuch as, petitioner No.1 is the husband of respondent No.2. The matrimonial disputes have now been amicably settled between them. As a result of which, all proceedings pending between the parties before the 5th Family Court, Bandra have been disposed of and the parties have also agreed for quashing of the F.I.R. in question, as the respondent No.2 has no intention to pursue the same any further. The respondent No.2 has filed 2 325.11 affidavit sworn on 11th February, 2011 which is taken on record. She is present in Court. On inquiry, she fairly accepts that the contents of the affidavit are correct and she has agreed for settlement including for making joint application for quashing of criminal action with full understanding and without any pressure. 2. Accordingly, Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). (A.R.JOSHI, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)