IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 736 of 2006 (M/B) 1. Sachi Ram S/o Late Badamu 2. Kishor Kumar S/o Late Bachi Ram 3. Dhan Raj S/o Late Bachi Ram All R/o Gusain Bhawan, Near Mutton Shop, Tiloth Sera, District Uttarkashi. ........... Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through Secretary, Rehabilitation, Government of Uttaranchal, Dehradun. 2. Tehri Hydro Development Corporation, through its Managing Director. 3. Special Land Acquisition Officer (SLAO), Irrigation, New Tehri, District Tehri Garhwal. 4. Director, Rehabilitation, Tehri Bandh Pariyojana, 26 EC Road, Dehradun. ............ Respondents Mr. Pankaj Purohit, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Standing Counsel for respondents Nos. 1 & 3. Mr. U.K. Uniyal, Senior Counsel with Mr. Shobhit Saharia, Advocate for respondents Nos. 2 & 4. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Mr. Pankaj Purohit, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Standing Counsel for respondents Nos. 1 & 3. Mr. U.K. Uniyal, Senior Counsel with Mr. Shobhit Saharia, Advocate for respondents Nos. 2 & 4. 2. Mr. Pankaj Purihit, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty of working out the other remedies, which may be available to the petitioners the redressal of their grievances projected in the writ petition under the relevant provisions of law. 3. Permission granted. 4. With the above liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. With the above order, CLMA No. 7515 of 2006 also stands dismissed as withdrawn. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 23.06.2006 23.06.2006 G