IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.449-M of 2008 Date of Order: 03.03.2008 Deepak @ Deepak Suri ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab. ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr.Vipul Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.S.Brar, DAG, Punjab. RAJESH BINDAL J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had in fact married with the Sonia, for whose alleged abduction his father has lodged the FIR for the reasons that they had married against the wishes of the father of Sonia. Be that as it may, without opining on the merits of the controversy, interim bail already granted to the petitioner on 10.01.2008 is made absolute. The petition is disposed of. March 3, 2008 (RAJESH BINDAL) nt JUDGE