1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.2924 of 2007 (Shri Amol s/o Sheshraoji Tekade v. Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University, through Controller of Examination and another) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Shri Willson Mathew, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri B.G. Kulkarni, Advocate for R- 1. Smt. T.D. Khade, AGP for R- 3. CORAM : A.H. Joshi & R.C. Chavan, JJ. DATE : 6th September, 2007 1. The learned Advocate for the petitioner states that the purpose of this petition has been accomplished, as the caste validity certificate has been issued in favour of the petitioner and the same has been submitted to respondent No.2 College. 2. The limited grievance, which the petitioner represents in the present petition, is that in spite of this compliance, it would not be possible for him to get his result declared, as respondent No.2 wants to send the said certificate to Mumbai for verification and unless respondent No.2 College submits the validity certificate to respondent No.1 University, the petitioner would not get the original Mark-sheet from the University, and in absence of the Mark-sheet, he is not able to submit his application for Supplementary Examination (Winter 2007). According to the petitioner, this process would consume certain time 2 and due to this, he will suffer a loss of one complete year. 3. In this background, without creating any right in favour of the petitioner, we direct respondent No.1 University to furnish the original Mark-sheet to the petitioner, which would enable him to apply for Supplementary Examination (Winter 2007) in the subjects in which he has failed. This shall, however, be subject to confirmation of the seat, etc., in the quota in which he had sought the admission, to be received through respondent No.2 in due course. 4. With the above directions, the petition is disposed of. 5. This order takes care of the reliefs prayed for in Civil Application No.6360 of 2007, which too is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE pdl