IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11987 of 2010 Kedar Singh @ Chhotan Shukla son of Jhapsu Singh, resident of village Hajipur, Mahto Tola, P.S. Barauni, District Begusarai. ……..Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar……………..Opposite party. ----------- 03/ 19.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This petition for bail has been filed by the petitioner, who is an accused for offences punishable under sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that neither the petitioner was named in the F.I.R. nor he was arrested from the spot nor he was put on Test Identification Parade. He also submits that the petitioner was arrested along with Shyamniti Singh @ Ajay Singh and on the basis of their alleged confessional statements they have been implicated in the instant case. He further avers that the petitioner has got no concern with the alleged occurrence and co-accused Shyamniti Singh @ Ajay Singh has already been enlarged on bail on the orders of the court below itself. He also states that paragraph-131 of the case diary clearly shows that mobile recovered from his possession as stated in earlier paragraphs of the case diary including paragraph-43, was not the looted mobile. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, this petition is allowed. 2 Let the petitioner, namely Kedar Singh @ Chhotan Shukla be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000.00 (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Barauni (Garhara) P.S. Case No.256 of 2009. harish/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )