SBCRLMB No.6516/10. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. ORDER S.B.CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.6516/2010. Subhash Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order:- July 16, 2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Vijay Poonia, Counsel for petitioner. Shri Amit Poonia, Public Prosecutor. ****** Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material made available to me during the arguments of the case. Contention of learned counsel for petitioner is that the alleged offence against the petitioner is one u/S.16/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act. Except this, there is no other previous criminal case ever registered against the petitioner. All other co-accused have been enlarged on bail. Petitioner is in jail for quite some time. Investigation is almost complete. Nothing is to be recovered at the instance of the petitioner. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. SBCRLMB No.6516/10. 2 Considering the submissions made at the bar, the nature of accusation, the materials on record and all other facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. In the result, this bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Subhash S/o Shri Narayan Ram shall be released on bail in FIR No.03/2010 P.S. Baggar, District Jhunjhunu for offence u/S.16/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing until conclusion of the trial. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil