i- C.1- I-^-Q 1« •avci €T&ii«id«^^ST\ •CTWKS, f^CTT^rq;7(^.3T.) W.P^No./2>='/ 200)^- sftaTcft 31A"11 sTcft^ T?f?T -FET. ^t.^.GTsft'^' 'SS 5 2 ?psf, 3SET cT;^ rclT^cp rcfcllTtD dl~i6crOTl cpta'yi'-ii^i, -ST^rt'IST ^3TT7 'STT^ CRT d1<^>l°l '3T?ftTsft affST? S& TTRT, [5|dl*iy,7 Tu1dl fsTETT3Tg7 (®.3T.).. "f^^RST'; 1 . y>T-n^-tc)|d, STT3TST siTCT f?Tsn fera-TT^T ^t.c&.a-rcTcT 7T2Tg7 (t5.OT.) 2. fuirii RT^TT 3rfS.T?prft <*>l<yrcd«U f3TcTT f?T^TT STfETcRT^t cRd-i-Tjiulc. fsrfeSST, fBreTTH~g7(ES.3T.) ^3. aft c&.e&.fSrafcT^R? ^':®TraTc;r i^icii^D srsrte^n 'STSTZ 'Sf^ U3fR4^1 '?E^pT S& TTTST f73T "ZtS 3T. 2 RreTT3Tg7(?5.OT.) .. o^ ^FiragreftaroT A.h^S^oR1 qi^%T/Aa CTife^T aicisfa CT^CT^ET r '0-r - 226 TTriy<flci 3T5^E^Et ^ZT »ll-ZcflAI, \^1^^ ^W3II GH COURT .-^UUATTI^i'S T ^n WRiT PETiTiON (S) N0.1220 OF 2007 iTIONER RESPONDENTS Smt. Aruna Banode v'ersus State of Chhattisaam & Others it Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Sinaie Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Aanihotri, J. Present:- Shri Shashi Kushvraha, counsei for the petitioner. ShriA.V. Sridhar, Panei Lawver for theState. ORDER(O ,''Ps.«;sprinn this ."' .-'sv nf FiS.h"ian/ '?ni (Hassed on tiiis &"" aay ',2U1U) [h the consent of iearned counsei appearins for the parties, ^t^ fl ^ the :ltion js r?eari3 finaiiy. 3y this petitjon, the petitloner seeks a airection io the respondents that the petjtioner may be promoted on the basls of her appointment on 1-4-1977 with coi~sequential benefits. The petitioner has not pointed out any other reasons or facts for nof grantin.g promotion to the petitloner except the circular dated 3-7-2003 ('Annexure - P/3) whereby ail the Hsads of the Departments, Coiiectors and Chairman, Board of Revenue have been directea' to conslder the cases without deiav. 4. , The petitioner is not in a position lo point out asto whether her case has been considered or rejeded or her case was not considered at ali for grant of prornotion. There are severaj factors for promotion e.g. vacancy on the promotionai post, financial problems and other service requirements of the candidate & administration. Thus, the prayer to direct the respondent authorities to promote .the petitioner directly on the 3asis of her appointment on 1-4-1977 cannot be granted. However, if the petitioner makes a representation for grant of promotlon, the respondents mav consider and deci.de the same in accordance v/ith iaw and in the iight Of'cirGular aated 3-7-2003 as expeditiousJY as possibie. Accordinaiv, the writ petition is dismissed with the aforesaid ":?s.r;tirir'i% •l-l'<-> l, 1 •!»?i •fV.S, •JOV111 Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge