Page 1 of 8 &\®V w BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT JUDIC E AT BILASPUR (C.G.) IN THE MATTER O F LAKHAN LAL BACHHLE AGE 45 EAS SON OF SHRI PRAHLAD BACHHLE, ASSISTANT STATTSTICAL OFFICER TRIBAL WELFARE, RAIPUR, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF HOSHANGABAD M.P., AT PRESENT HIRAPUR , RAIPUR C.G. PETITION ER VERSUS 1. UNION OFINDIA ‘ THROUGH SECRETARY-DEPARTME OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCE AND PENSION, KHAN MARKET NEW DELHI 2. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH, THROUGH SECRETARY, (TRIBAL WELFARE) MANTRALAYA, VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL (M.P.) 3. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, THROUGH SECRETARY, (TRIBAL WELFARE ) , MANTRALAYA, D.K.S. BHAWAN G E ROAD RAIPUR (C G ) RESPONDENT “WK 6’5 cRETARY VALLA BH~ BHAW’9N" BMW— m co} I a \W STATE REeRGFHNIsHTmN GEL 1 W WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/ 227 OF THE n kkm éONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE ? JyNATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARI AND ANY OTHER ORDER OR DIRECTION AS DEEMED FIT A UR YR NT S .. 9g HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon’blc Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. n't Petition No. 1912 of 20 W 03 Petitioner Lakhan Lal Bachhel Versus Respondants Unicn of India 85 others Shri M. K, Bhaduri, Advocate for the petitioner. Shn‘ S. K. Beriwal, Standmg counsel for Respondent No, 1. Shri Sachin. Singh Rajput for Respondents No, 2 and 4. Shri Pemkaj Shn'vastava, Pemel lawyer for respondent No. 3 ORAL ORDE (6m February, 2006) The following order of the Court was passed by Satish K. Agnihotri, J 1. Leaxned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who is working on the post of Assistant Statistical Otficer in the Tribal Welfare Deparnnent, is a permanent resident of Distn'ct— Hoshangahad in the State of Madhya Pradesh. The petitioner has been allocated to the State of Chhattisgarh and he wants his reallocation to the State of Madhya Pradesh. Learned counsel for tile petitioner, on instruction, submits that the petitioner be granted liberty to make a representation to the respondents, for redressal of his giievances Learned counsel appealing for the respondents have no obJection to the said submission In View of the foregomg, the petition stands disposed of finally, With liberty to the petitioner to make an appropnate representation to the respondentslauthonties concerned Within a period of two weeks from today, and the respondents] authorities are dnected to ’ consrder and dec1de the same, in an objective manner in accordance With law Within a period of Six weeks from the date of receipt of the iepresentation, if any //, Certihed copy, as per Rules, ot Thaki ir is Sd/- « \ atishK Agmhotri f R i S