1 D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO.892/2008 Smt. Manju Agarwal Vs. Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal & Ors. Date of Order :: 22-04-2009 HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. DEEPAK VERMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH TATIA Mr. M.S. Godara, for the appellant. Unsuccessful petitioner of WP No.7617/2007 decided by the learned Single Judge on 5.9.2008 is before us in this writ appeal. Appellant herein had challenged before the learned Single Judge the order of transfer dated 5.10.2007 and another order dated 25.10.2007 passed by the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur rejecting the appellant's appeal. Appellant has been working as Teacher Gr.III in Government Upper Primary School, Palewali Dhani, Hanumangarh from where she has been transferred to Government Girls Upper Primary School, Beharwalakalan, Tibbi. According to learned counsel for the appellant, State Government was not competent to order transfer of the appellant. However, learned Single Judge did not find favour with the argument so advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant and after referring to Section 89(8-A) of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, has come to the conclusion that State Government is very much empowered to effect transfer of teachers. Learned counsel for the appellant contended that she could not have been transferred within the same Panchayat by the State Government. The State Government is competent to transfer such employees outside the Panchayat Samiti. We do not find any merit or substance in the argument. 2 It is not disputed before us that the order of transfer has already been implemented and appellant has joined at the new place of posting. That being so, for all practical purposes, the writ appeal has rendered infructuous. We accordingly dismiss the same. [PRAKASH TATIA],J. [DEEPAK VERMA],CJ. Praveen 3 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2172/2009 Smt. Meera Meena Vs. District Judge, Sikar & Ors. During the hearing of the above writ petition, Hon'ble the Chief Justice has observed that the above case has been continuously fixed for plaintiffs' evidence for the last thirty three years and no effective order has been passed by the trial court. Even on 27.1.2009, another opportunity for producing evidence was given while the case is still pending for more than thirty three years. Hon'ble the Chief Justice has directed that the concerned Judge may be asked to explain as to why no efforts have been made to decide this old case. Registrar -cum- Principal Secretary to Hon'ble the Chief Justice Registrar General 4 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2996/2009 Fakira & Anr. Vs. Addl.District Judge (Fast Track), Tijara & Ors. During the hearing of the above writ petition, Hon'ble the Chief Justice has observed that in case No.28/2005 pending in the Court of Additional District Judge (Fast Track), Tijara, evidence of the plaintiff was closed on 28.8.2008. It has been noticed that on that date, case was fixed for the evidence of the petitioner and the petitioner had filed talbana for summoning the witnesses, but no process was issued by the court and on the date of hearing, evidence was closed after examining one witness and the order- sheet was not written properly. Hon'ble the Chief Justice has directed that the concerned Judge may be asked to explain as to why processes were not issued and the order-sheet was not written properly. Registrar -cum- Principal Secretary to Hon'ble the Chief Justice Registrar General