THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.S. APPA RAO C.M.A. No. 633 of 2011 JUDGMENT: (Per NVR,J) This civil miscellaneous appeal is directed against the order dated 07.06.2011 passed in I.A. No. 1280 of 2011 in O.S. No. 1226 of 2008 by the Principal District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, dismissing the application filed by the appellants, under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of C.P.C., seeking proper directions to respondent No.1 to stop the construction and also to issue orders to other respondents to cancel the sanctioned permission plan dated 07.12.2010. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and perused the order under revision and other material available on record. Admittedly, the appellants herein filed the present suit initially for cancellation of agreement of sale-cum-General Power of Attorney said to have been executed by them in favour of the 1st respondent and for perpetual injunction and subsequently, contending that the 1st respondent has forcibly occupied the suit schedule property, they got the relief amended, adding the relief of recovery of possession of the suit schedule property. A perusal of the record reveals that the application filed by the appellants earlier, under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2, for grant of interim injunction, was dismissed by the trial Court and the same was challenged by them before this Court in C.M.A. No. 870 of 2009, and this Court, having granted interim injunction restraining the 1st respondent from alienating or creating any third party rights over the suit schedule property, made the said interim order of injunction absolute and by judgment dated 28.07.2010, disposed of the C.M.A., directing the trial Court to dispose of the suit expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of the order. Thus, as on today, there is an order of temporary injunction in favour of the appellants, restraining the 1st respondent from alienating or creating third party rights over the suit schedule property. The interests of the appellants-plaintiffs having been sufficiently protected by the said order of this Court, the appellants-plaintiffs are supposed to co-operate with the trial of the suit, so as to enable the trial Court to dispose of the suit expeditiously as per the directions of this Court in the earlier C.M.A, instead of protracting the litigation by filing interlocutory applications. In the circumstances, we are of the considered opinion that the trial Court has rightly dismissed the petition filed by the appellants- plaintiffs, by the order under appeal, and no interference is warranted therewith, in exercise of appellate jurisdiction of this Court. The civil miscellaneous appeal is devoid of merits and is accordingly dismissed, however, without costs. __________________ JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA ___________________ JUSTICE K.S. APPA RAO 12th July, 2011 IBL