IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH JUNE 2008 / 28TH JYAISHTA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 1524 of 2006(S) -------------------------------------------- PETITIONER/PETITIONER: --------------------------------------- SHAJI Y.K., S/O.N.KRISHNA PANICKER, AGED 37 YEARS, OPERTOR, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, RESIDING AT SHIVALAYAM, AYIRA P.O., PARASSALA. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------------------- T.P. MOHAN LAL, S/O.PADMANABHAN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.C.UNNIKRISHNAN THIS CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & A.K.BASHEER, J. ------------------------------------------ Cont. Case (C)No.1524 of 2006 & I.A.No.334 of 2008 ------------------------------------------ Dated, this the 18th day of June, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu, C.J. One and the only direction that was issued by this Court while disposing of O.P.No.13399/98 reads as under: “The writ petition is hence disposed of making it clear that only in case the respondents have a case that the certificates namely Exts.P2, P3 and P4 are bogus or the same are issued on mistake of fact, any further action in the matter shall be taken. Needless to say that the petitioner shall be issued notice before taking any such action taken.” 2. Alleging that the respondent has disobeyed the orders and directions issued by this Court, the petitioner in the original petition has filed the present contempt petition. 3. After disposal of the original petition, the respondent has now passed an order dated 6.2.2008 which is produced as Annexure R1(a) along with the counter affidavit filed by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.. 4. We have carefully perused the letter/order passed by the respondent dated 6.2.2008. Having gone through the said letter, we are of the opinion that the respondent has neither wilfully nor deliberately disobeyed the orders and Cont.Case (C)No.1524 of 2006 2 directions issued by this Court. In that view of the matter, we need not have to take cognizance of this contempt petition. Accordingly the proceedings are dropped. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE (A.K.BASHEER) JUDGE vns/dk.