1 AO-483-11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 483 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 673 OF 2011 IN NTICE OF MOTION NO. OF 2011 IN BC.C.C. L.C. SUIT NO. 373 OF 2011 Mohd. Shakil Yusuf Jurai ... Appellant (Orig. Plaintiff) Vs. The Mun. Corpn. of Gr.Mumbai Respondents (Orig. defendants) Mr. K.D.Jha,Advocate, for the appellant Mrs. K.K.Soraan,Advocate for the respondent - MCGM. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 27th June, 2011. P.C. 1. This appeal was preferred against the refusal of ad-interim injunction pending the Notice of Motion. The Notice of Motion is still pending. By order dated 25.4.2011, this Court had directed to maintain status quo in respect of the disputed structure. 2 AO-483-11.sxw 2. In my opinion, the appeal and the application may be disposed of with the following directions :- The respondents shall file reply and/or written statement within four weeks before the trial Court and the trial Court shall expedite the hearing and dispose of the Notice of Motion in Suit No.373/2011 within six weeks thereafter. 3. The learned Counsel for the respondent, on instructions, states that the disputed structure of the first floor was demolished prior to the status quo order was passed by this Court, while this fact is denied by the learned Counsel for the appellant. The trial Court shall appoint some Commissioner for spot inspection and get the status report before passing final order on Notice of Motion. Till disposal of Notice of Motion, status quo shall be maintained. Appeal and the application stands disposed of accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)