CWP No. 22 of 2010. 5.1.2010. Present: Mr. Ajay Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Addl. Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General, for the respondents. CMP No. 49 of 2010. Allowed. CWP No.22 of 2010. Mr. Chandel, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this Court has passed the following order in CWP No.4957 of 2009 on 30.12.2009: “CMP No.8998 of 2009. Allowed. The application stands disposed of. CWP No.4957 of 2009. Notice returnable within four weeks. Mr. R.K. Bawa, learned Advocate General, on instructions received from Mr. J.K. Verma, learned Deputy Advocate General, waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. Mr. Verma prays for and is permitted to file reply within four weeks. CMP No. 8996 of 2009. Notice in the aforesaid terms. Till further orders, the parties are directed to maintain status quo. Copy dasti.” According to him, the interim order has not been implemented in letter and spirit by the State. It needs no clarification that once orders are passed, these are to be implemented. We are of the considered view that the petitioner ought to have moved an application under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure for impleading the present petitioner as party respondent in CWP No. 4957 of 2009. In view of the above, Mr. Chandel, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present writ petition. He is permitted to move an appropriate application for impleadment in CWP No. 4957 of 2009. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. CMP No. 48 of 2010. In view of the dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn, the present application is also dismissed. (R.B. Misra), ACJ. 5th January, 2010. (Rajiv Sharma), J. (tr)