IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN FRIDAY, THE 3RD DECEMBER 2010 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 OP (RC).No. 925 of 2010(O) -------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN EP. 15/2006 IN RCP.20/2005 of MUNSIFF COURT, NADAPURAM .................... PETITIONER: ------------------------------- 1. PANAYALLUKKANDI KUNHAMI W/O.KUNHABDULLA, KOCHUMMAL VEEDU, KUTTIADI, OORATH DESOM, VADAKARA TALUK. 2. KOCHUMMAL SULEKHA, D/O.KUNHABDULLA KOCHUMMAL VEEDU, KUTTIADI, OORATH DESO, VADAKARA TALUK. 3. KOCHUMMAL ZAINABA, D/O.KUNHABDULLA, KOCHUMMAL VEEDU, KUTTIADI, OORATH DESOM, VADAKARA TALUK. 4. ZAKKEENA, D/O.KUNHABDULLA, KOVVUMMAL HOUSE, KUTTIADI, OORATH DESOM, VADAKARA TALUK. 5. PUNATHIKANDI NAZAR, S/O.MOOTHAN, KURICHIKAKOM P.O., KUTTIADI, OORATH DESOM, VADAKARA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.V.V.ASOKAN SRI.R.JAIKRISHNA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. MUKKATH KIOLLANDI AASSIA HAJJUMMA, D/O.ALIKUTTY, KUTTIADI AMSOM, VADAKARA-673 101. 2. ABDUL RASHEED, S/O.MOIDU HAJI, KOODATHIL VEEDU, KUTTIADI, OORATH DESOM, VADAKARA0678 101. 3. KOCHUMMAL AMMED, S/O.KUNHABDULLA REPRESENTED BY POWER HOLDER VATTAKKANDI ABOOBACKER, POOZHIKANDOM HOUSE, RAYAROTH, QUILANDI-673 305. 4. KOCHUMMAL MUSTHAFA, S/O.KUNHABDULLA REPRESENTED BY POWER HOLDER VATTAKKANDI ABOOBACKER, POOZHIKANDOM HOUSE, RAYAROTH, QUILANDI-673 305. 5. KOCHUMMAL KUNHIPATH;U, D/O.KUNHABDULLA, KORANGAD PANDIKUNNAM VEEDU, RAYAROTH, KADAVOOR DESOM, QUILANDI-673 305. 6. SAMEER, REPRESENTED BY POWER HOLDER VATTAKKANDI ABOOBACKER, POOZHIKANDOM HOUSE, RAYAROTH, QUILANDI-673 305. ADV. SRI.P.G.RAJAGOPALAN FOR R1 SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR FOR R1 THIS OP (RENT CONTROL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. ------------------------ O.P.(RC)No. 925 OF 2010 ------------------------ Dated this the 3rd day of December, 2010 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. This original petition under Article 227 has been filed by the petitioners, strangers to the rent control proceedings who have filed Ext.P1 claim petition before the Execution Court, seeking a direction to the learned Execution Court to dispose of Ext.P1 in accordance with law and to keep in abeyance proceedings for delivery till such disposal. 2. Sri.M.Gopikrishnan Nambiar, learned counsel who had lodged a caveat on behalf of the first respondent decree holder, submitted that Ext.P1 is a collusive affair between the judgment debtor and the present petitioners. The learned counsel narrated the history of this litigation and submitted that Ext.P1 has been filed after the judgment debtor had exhausted all legal remedies available to him including those before the Supreme Court. 3. We do find force in the submissions of O.P.(RC).No.925/2010 2 Mr.Gopikrishnan Nambiar. However, as Ext.P1 claim petition and Ext.P3 stay petition are pending before the learned Munsiff, it is necessary that the learned Munsiff passes orders on Ext.P1 or at least on Ex.P3 before delivery is effected. Under the above circumstances, we dispose of the original petition issuing the following directions; i). The learned Munsiff is directed to complete the enquiry and take final decision on Ext.P1 claim petition at the earliest and at any rate within seven days of receiving a copy of this judgment. ii). If for any reason, the learned Munsiff is unable to dispose of Ext.P1 as mentioned above, the learned Munsiff will pass orders on Ext.P3 stay petition within the above time frame after hearing both sides. Iii). At any rate, the order of delivery presently passed will not be effected till Ext.P3 is disposed of. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE dpk