-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN, JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Second appeal No.162 of 2010. Ismile son of Shri Raheem Bux VERSUS Bharat Lal son of Shri Brijmohan Swarankar Date of Order :::: April 7th 2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh Mr. J.P. Goyal, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant *** By the Court : Heard learned counsel for the plaintiff-appellant. Perused the impugned judgment passed by the learned Lower Appellate Court reversing the findings of the learned trial Court on the issue of personal-bonafide-necessity. Admittedly, the appellant, being father, is running the business of tailoring and both the sons of the appellant are also working with him. Learned counsel for the plaintiff-appellant further admitted that apart from two sons for whom the necessity was alleged and who are working with the landlord-plaintiff, there are other tailors, who are also engaged by the plaintiff in the shop. Taking the totality of the circumstances into account the learned Lower Appellate Court has held that the personal-bonafide- necessity of the appellant is not proved. That being a finding of fact. I find no reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and decree passed by the learned Lower Appellate Court in second -2- appeal under Section 100 C.P.C. No substantial question of law arises in this second appeal. The second appeal is accordingly dismissed. (Dalip Singh), J. Ashok/