IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18603 of 2009 1. SMT. NOOTAN KUMARI @ NUTAN MISHRA D/O SHAILENDRA NATH @ SAITHER THAKUR, W/O DR. SANJIV KUMAR MISHRA R/O VILL/MOH- GOSAIDASPUR, P.S. NATH NAGAR, DISTT. BHAGALPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE SECRETARY DEPTT. OF REVENUE AND LAND REFORMS 2. THE SECRETARY DEPTT. OF REVENUE AND LAND REFORMS, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIATE, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/COLLECTOR BHAGALPUR 4. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE SADAR BHAGALPUR 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE BHAGALPUR 6. THE EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE SADAR BHAGALPUR 7. THE CIRCLE OFFICER-CUM-BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER NATH NAGAR ANCHAL, BHAGALPUR 8. THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, POLICE STATION MADHUSUDANPUR NATH NAGAR, BHAGALPUR 9. THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE NATH NAGAR, BHAGALPUR 10. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND REFORMS BHAGALPUR 11. CHANGURI MANDAL S/O JUTHAN MANDAL R/O VILL- BHATORIA, P.S. NATH NAGAR, DISTT. BHAGALPUR 12. SAUDI YADAV S/O PERSUM YADAV R/O VILL- BHATORIA, P.S. NATH NAGAR, DISTT. BHAGALPUR 13. ANANDI YADAV S/O LATE YAG YADAV R/O VILL- BHATORIA, P.S. NATH NAGAR, DISTT. BHAGALPUR 14. JATINDRA YADAV S/O YADU YADAV R/O VILL- BHATORIA, P.S. NATH NAGAR, DISTT. BHAGALPUR 15. BHIM MANDAL S/O JATUNI MANDAL R/O VILL- BHATORIA, P.S. NATH NAGAR, DISTT. BHAGALPUR 16. MADOSI YADAV S/O SUMARU YADAV R/O VILL- BHATORIA, P.S. NATH NAGAR, DISTT. BHAGALPUR 17. KARMESAR MANDAL S/O CHHEDI MANDAL R/O VILL- BHATORIA, P.S. NATH NAGAR, DISTT. BHAGALPUR 18. PRAKASH MANDAL S/O CHHEDI MANDAL R/O VILL- BHATORIA, P.S. NATH NAGAR, DISTT. BHAGALPUR 19. RAJU MANDAL S/O SHYAM MANDAL R/O VILL- PACHKARIA BHATARIA, BHATARIA, P.S. NATH NAGAR, DISTT. BHAGALPUR 20. DHATURI YADAV S/O JABHI YADAV R/O VILL- UTTAR TOLA BHATARIA, P.S. NATH NAGAR, DISTT. BHAGALPUR 21. MODI YADAV S/O GANESH YADAV R/O VILL- UTTAR TOLA BHATARIA, P.S. NATH NAGAR, DISTT. BHAGALPUR 22. CHHATI YADAV S/O SHAMBHU YADAV R/O VILL- UTTAR TOLA BHATARIA, P.S. NATH NAGAR, DISTT. BHAGALPUR ----------- 02. 28.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2 In view of the remedy of revision available before the District Judge concerned aggrieved by an exercise of power for non-compliance based under Section 145/146 Cr.P.C., leave is sought to withdraw the application to avail the alternative remedy. In view of the availability of statutory alternative remedy, there is no occasion for the Court to make any observation on the merits of the matter. Nothing in the present order shall be interpreted or construed as a reluctance of the Court to interfere except on the ground of availability of an alternative remedy. If the petitioner prefers any such application before the competent Court, let the same be considered in accordance with law and the laws of limitation, keeping in mind that the petitioner was persuading his remedy before a wrong Forum only. The application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. P.K. ( Navin Sinha, J.)