IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2783 of 2004 SUKH NARAIN TIWARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 11. 17.08.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inadvertently in the last line of the order at page 1, “respondent no. 6” has been typed instead of “respondent no. 4”. Similarly, in the third paragraph of page no. 3, respondent no. 3 has been typed instead of “respondent no. 4”. Let the word “respondent no.6” last line of page no. 1 be read as “respondent no. 4” and also third paragraph of the order at page 3 the word “respondent no. 3” be read as “respondent no. 4”. The time for filing the representation is extended by another four weeks from today. Let the order dated 10.07.2009 is modified to the above extent. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)