IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :06.07.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T. SUDANTHIRAM Crl.O.P.No.15396 of 2011 S.Navshath Mohammed ... Petitioner / Respondent Versus Rani Kathija ... Respondent/ Petitioner Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to set aside the order passed in Crl.R.C.No.53 of 2010 dated 09.12.2011 passing the order by the Additional District Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court IV, Thirupur, and confirming the order of Judicial Magistrate-II, Thirupur, in M.C.No.14 of 2008 dated 16.04.2010 and its consequential warrant notice issued by the learned Judicial Magistrate II, Thirupur in CMP.No.4447 of 2011 in M.C.No.14 of 2008. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Vijendran For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Government Advocate (Criminal side) O R D E R This petition has been filed for setting aside the order passed in Crl.R.C.No.53 of 2010 dated 09.12.2011 passing the order by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court IV, Thirupur, and confirming the order of Judicial Magistrate-II, Thirupur, in M.C.No.14 of 2008 dated 16.04.2010 and its consequential warrant notice issued by the learned Judicial Magistrate II, Thirupur in CMP.No.4447 of 2011 in M.C.No.14 of 2008. 2. The petitioner herein had already preferred a revision petition before the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court -II), Thirupur. Now the petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. 3. This Court heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the records. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. The petitioner had already exhausted his remedy by filing the revision petition before the Additional Sessions Court, Tiruppur. Section 397(3) of Cr.P.C is as follows: " If an application under this Section has been made by any person either to the High Court or to the Sessions Judge, no further application by the same person shall be entertained by the other of them." The bar under Section 397(3) Cr.P.C can not be circumvented by invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. 5. This Court does not find any illegality in the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge and there is no miscarriage of justice and as such, the petitioner cannot seek for interference of this Court invoking the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C only amounts to second revision petition. Therefore, this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C is not maintainable. 6. This Criminal original petition is dismissed as not maintainable. Consequently connected MP.Nos.1,2 and 3 of 2011 are closed. Sd/- Asst.Registrar. /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar. ksr To 1. The Additional District Sessions Judge Fast Track Court No.IV Thirupur 2. The Judicial Magistrate II, Thirupur 3. The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras 1 cc to Mr.P. Vijendran, Advocate, Sr. 39767 Crl.O.P.No.15396 of 2011 SAI (CO) kk 20/7 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/