N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR [C.G.1 I PETITIONERS WRIT PET1T10N(S)N0. $1“ /2oo9 1.Chhatrapal Swarnkar S/o late Sri Atmaram swarnkar, aged—about 51 years, upper division teacher, govt. higher secondary school, Pamgarh, Distt.—Janjgir—champa [C.G.] 2 .Aljun Singh sandilya S / o Sri Ramayan Singh Sandilya Aged-about 57 years, upper division teacher, govt. higher secondary school, Bhainso, Distt.- Janjgir—champa [C.G.] 3.Bhuneshwa_r das Vaishnav S/o Sri Ram Vilas das Vaishnav aged—about 54 years, govt‘ higher secondary school, Sukulpara Kharrad, Distt.— Janjgir— champa [C.G.] 4.Madhoram Bani S/o Sri Baladrao Bani, head master, govt. pre middle school, Mudpar (b) Distt.- Janjgir— champa [C.G.] /5.Moti Singh Tanwar S/O'Sri Ganpati Singh Tanwar Aged—about 54 years, head master, govt. primary school, devarghata, Distt.- Janjgir champa [C.G.] /6.Gorelal kasyap S/o Rambharos kasyap, Upper division teacher, govt. pre middle school, Tiwari para, Kharrad, Distt.- Janjgir Champa [C.G.] VERSUS 1 .State of Chhattisgarh Through— Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur [C.G.] r /2. District Education Officer, distt— Janjgir /3.Block Education officer, Pamgarh, Distt.- janjgir-Champa [C.G.] Janjgir—Champa, Champa [C.G.] \ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE \ WRIT ORDER OR DIRECTIONS HIGH (3OURT QF CHHATTISGARH ' BILA$PUR WRIT ?ETITION (S) NOSZM QF 2&09 PETiTiQNEE§ Chhatrapai Swamkar aad others Versus RE$PONDENTS State of Chhai‘nisgarh and other$ (Writ petmon Lmder Amcle 226 of the Comtm w respondams. ay ‘“ , W LN L Qxwu< gmasgha w miss 23m ay a: actobeg’, 23:39) Wkth the cement of ieamed counsel appearing fm ihe g petition is heard finaHy. 2) Leamed counsei appéarmg w: the @eéi‘timers guomiiS KM‘ *1 e a m rm mm tat: Cws: ihiis pei2i:iare or: merits, at this siage. hmvwea‘, ieamed ccunsel submits that the case is squareiy covered by order dated 24-8-1 §§2 passed by the Madhya Pradesh State AdminiStrative Tribunal, Jabaiyur in (1A. No. 2745;1989 (Madhukam Yadu'vanfi 5%? Qihers Vs. State of MP. and Others). The said order passed'by the Tfibunal has been taken to the Supreme Court ahd the Supreme Court was pieaeed to confirm the order passed by the Tribunal by order dated 3-1—1 994 in S.L.P. (C) No 68$2193 9hr} Patet submits that the petitiorter s have made combined rep eserrtatlon dated 4409 4009 {Annexure PM) betore the respondent auttrortties, but the same has hot been consrdered and decided ttit date. 3 6‘ rt Bhac‘uri teamed Pane‘ Lawyer for the State submits that the pendind representation or the petitioners shail be constdered and decided by the concerned authority, m accordance with law, on its owr merits, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4) ih View of foregoing, according to teamed counsel for the petitioners nothing survives in the matter. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. f' r/ ‘ Sdl— ‘twr a —v . r hatlshK Agmhetrr udge ‘Amit u 3 ./ i J