IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- CIVIL SECOND APPEAL No. 385 of 2004 LR'S OF JAMNALAL V/S SHRI PUSHTI M.T.P.T.,KANKROLI & ORS Mr. AK ACHRAYA, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 26.7.2006 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the appellant. The findings recorded by the two learned Courts below about the appellant being the Pujari in the temple and the trust being registered as a public trust, consequently the appellant not being the owner of the temple, and being not entitled to raise construction, are pure findings of fact, and are duly supported by evidence on record, including documentary evidence like Ex.4, Ex.14, Ex.15, Ex.2, Ex.3 etc. apart from oral evidence. The findings, in my view, are not shown to be vitiated on any of the grounds available under Section 100 CPC. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed summarily. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /tarun/