CMPMO No. 74 of 2008. 27.3.2008 Present: Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, counsel for the Petitioner. This petition is directed against the order dated 1.3.2008 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Div), Court No.III, Hamipur in an application filed under Order 14 rule 3 CPC read with Section 151 CPC by the plaintiff which was rejected. Admittedly, the suit in question was filed in the year 1997. In 2003, the Court had asked for preparation of the excerpts of the revenue record. These excerpts were submitted in the year 2003. According to the petitioner, he had filed some application in the year 2003 objecting to the correctness of the said excerpts and prayed that the same be sent to the expert for its correction. Evidence was led by both the parties and the case was adjourned to 22.2.2008 for hearing arguments. At that stage, this application under Order 7 Rule 14(3) CPC was filed praying that until excerpts are rectified, the suit may not be heard. This application was dismissed on the ground that it has been moved at a highly belated stage. I find no error in the order passed by the learned trial Court. In case the application for correction of the excerpts had been filed by the petitioner, it was also the duty of the counsel for the petitioner to bring it to the notice of the court and he could insist that some orders may be passed on this application. It seems that no efforts were made for five years to have orders passed on the first application. The petitioner awoke from his deep slumber five years later when the case was ripe for hearing. There is no error in the order of the learned trial Court dismissing the application as highly belated. However, in case such an application has been filed, the learned trial Court shall hear and dispose of the same along with the main suit. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. March 27, 2008. ( Deepak Gupta ), J. s.