IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23394 of 2010 KAMRUDDIN ANSARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 09.07.2010 Petitioner is languishing in jail in connection with a case registered under Section 341, 386, 34 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that on the alleged date of the occurrence the informant’s father and one Madan Rai were taken to brick klin of Mewalal and Rs. 2,000,00/-(two lacs) was taken and further demand of Rs. 3,000,00/-(three lacs) has been made. From the F.I.R. itself, it appears that there was a business transaction between the Mewalal and informant’s son and with specific allegation against the F.I.R. named persons, a case was instituted. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that he is employee of Mewalal and during investigation petitioner’s name sprang up though nothing has been recovered from the petitioner nor the petitioner has been put on T.I.P. Annexure-2 reflects accounting between the Mewalal and informant’s son. Considering the nature of allegation and the direct allegation in the F.I.R. against the Mewalal and other F.I.R. named accused persons and petitioner having no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner namely Kamruddin Ansari, be 2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikarhana, Motihar in connection with Chiraiya(Shrikarganj) P.S. Case No. 38 of 2010. It is made clear that if the petitioner defaults to appear on three consecutive dates during trial, the Trial Court will be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)