In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh Cross -objection No. 49/CI of 1996 in R. F. A. No. 2994 of 1992. Union of India and another ..... Appellants vs Chanan Singh .... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. V. K. Kataria, Advocate, for the cross-objector/ respondent. Rajesh Bindal J. The landowner has approached this court by filing the cross- objections for enhancement of compensation for the acquired land. Briefly, the facts are that land measuring 6318 kanals 19 marlas situated in the revenue estate of Villages Machaki Kalan, Faridkot , Kila Nau and Kameana was acquired vide notification dated 27.8.1974 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, `the Act') for establishing a Cantonment. The same was followed by notification under Section 6 of the Act on 31.12.1974. Dissatisfied with the award of the Land Acquisition Collector (for short, `the Collector'), the land owners filed objections which were referred to the learned court below for consideration, who keeping in view the material placed on record by the parties, vide award dated 29.2.1992 determined the value of the acquired land falling within 40 karams of Sadiq Faridkot road @ Rs. 30,000/- per acre and the remaining @ Rs. 20,000/- per acre. Learned counsel for the objector/respondent submitted that the main appeal was disposed of vide order dated 30.10.2008 in terms of judgment in R. F. A. No. 2506 of 1992 Union of India and another vs Ram Singh (deceased) through LRs, however, inadvertently the cross-objections remained pending. Since this court had already disposed of the main appeal in terms of judgment in Ram Singh's case (supra), the cross-objections are also disposed of in the same terms. 20.2.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge