1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Misc. Civil Application (Restoration) No.69/2008 In Civil Application No.8442/2007 In Rej. Writ Petition No.888/2007 (Decided) [Pragati Shikshan Sanstha, Kohli .vrs. State of Maharashtra and others] ........................................................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................... CORAM : K.J. ROHEE AND R.C. CHAVAN, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 07, 2008. None for the petitioner. The application is dismissed for default. JUDGE JUDGE Later-on (Dt. 7.2.2008) 1. Mr. C.G. Barapatre, the learned counsel for the petitioner, appears and expresses apology and states that he could 2 not appear before the court in time because of his vehicle failure. Considering his statement, the application is restored to file. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the notices of the writ petition were not issued as the office objection had remained to be removed. 3. In view of this submission, we think it expedient to set aside the dismissal of the writ petition. 4. The dismissal of the writ petition is set aside and writ petition no.888/2007 is restored to file. JUDGE JUDGE asg