IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI MONDAY, THE 21ST FEBRUARY 2011 / 2ND PHALGUNA 1932 WP(Crl.).No. 68 of 2011(S) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- V.K.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR,JISHA NIVAS, MANDANAM P.O, KUNNANTHANAM VILLAGE, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR SRI.JELSON J.EDAMPADAM RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATHANAMTHITTA 689 645. 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MULLAPPALLY,PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT 689 645. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KEEZHVAYPOOR,PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT 689 645. 4. M.R.SREEKUMAR, MUTTATHUSSERI VEEDU, CHERUKARA PO,NEELAMPEROOR PANCHAYAT,KAVALAM VILLAGE,KUTTANAD TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT 688506. 5. M.M.UDHAYAN, MUTTASSERI VEEDU, CHERUKARA PO,NEELAMPEROOR PANCHAYAT, KAVALAM VILLAGE,KUTTANAD TALUK,ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT 688 506. 6. REMANI UDHAYAN,MUTTASSERI VEEDU, CHERUKARA PO,NEELAMPEROOR PANCHAYAT, KAVALAM VILLAGE,KUTTANAD TALUK,ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT 688 506. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SMITHA DAS R5,6A BY DV. SRI.G.SUDHEER R5,6 BY SMT.M.JAYASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(Crl.).No. 68 of 2011(S) APPENDIX --------------- PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ----------------------------------- P1:- TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 9.2.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIOENR BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. RESPPONDENT'S EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- R5(a):- TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE SUB REGISTRAR, SUB REGISTRY OFFICE, CHANGANACHERRY DATED 2.2.2011 //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE. A.K. Basheer & P.Q. Barkath Ali, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P (Crl.). No. 68 of 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 21st day of February, 2011 Judgment Basheer, J: The detenu is present in Court. She has appeared along with her father as directed. Respondent No.4 is also present. We have interacted with the parties. Petitioner, the father of the detenu stated before us that the girl appears to be adamant and she still insists that she wants to live with respondent no.4. 2. We have spoken to Miss Nynee M.Nair and Mr.Sreekumar respondent no.4 herein. Both of them stated before us that they propose to get married under the Special Marriage Acts as decided by them already. We are informed that statutory period of one month will expire in the first week of March. 3. Having regard to the entire facts and circumstances of the case we are satisfied that Miss. Nynee M. Nair has to be ordered to be accommodated in a ladies hostel, for the time being. 4. The learned Government Pleader after getting instructions from one of the hostels nearby informs us that the authorities of Santhinikethan hostel at Vaduthala has agreed to accommodate Miss. Nynee M. Nair in their hostel. The girl appears to be agreeable to the above course of action. WP (Crl).68/2011 : 2 : 5. Therefore Miss. Nynee M. Nair shall be accommodated at Santhinikethan hostel at Vaduthala for the time being, till 07.03.2011. It will be open to Miss. Nynee M. Nair to decide her future course of action. She will be allowed to go with respondent no.4 on that day, if she so wishes. If respondent nos. 4 to 6 do not appear before the hostel authorities on that day to take Miss Nynee M. Nair, the parents or the petitioner shall be informed by the hostel authorities and Miss Nynee M. Nair shall be allowed to go along with them. 6. The expenses for the stay in the hostel shall be met by respondents 4 to 6. The requisite payment shall be made by these respondents before the hostel authorities today itself. Hostel authorities shall not permit Ms.Nynee to go out of the Hostel before 07.03.2011. With the above directions the writ petition is closed. A.K. Basheer Judge. P.Q. Barkath Ali Judge. rkc.