Patna High Court CWJC No.12841 of 2010 (2) dt.27-02-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12841 of 2010 ====================================================== Sri Jai Kishun Sao S/O Late Ram Karan Sao R/O Lohia Nagar More, P.S.- Kankarbagh, Distt.- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through Collector, Patna 2. The Managing Director, Housing Board Mangles Road, P.S.- Sachivalaya, Distt.- Patna 3. The Executive Engineer Housing Board, Kankarbagh, P.S.- Kankarbagh, Distt.- Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. (GP-11) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 27-02-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the respondents. The petitioner prays for quashing Letter no. 1480 dated 17.7.2009, issued by respondent no.3, whereby he has been directed to stop construction of house and to dismantle the constructed portion on Plot no. 698 which is part of Plot no. 242 and 243, situated at village Lohanipur Police station Kankarbagh, District Patna. Case of the petitioner is that Survey Plot no. 243 was never acquired by the Government and only a part of Plot no. 242 was acquired. The petitioner submits that after due sanction of map, he has made constructions on portion of Plot Patna High Court CWJC No.12841 of 2010 (2) dt.27-02-2012 no. 242 and 243 which has not been acquired by Government. He further submit that earlier measurement of the plot was done by Amin of the Housing Board. A copy of the measurement report is annexed as Annexure 7 to the writ petition. He submits that Annexure 7 supports his claim. I find that petitioner has filed representation before respondent no.2 in respect of his grievances. Respondent no.2 would dispose of the representation of the petitioner preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Respondent no.2 would give a personal hearing to the petitioner or his representative. In the meantime, status quo as of today would be maintained. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J)