- 1 - 861 rng IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.861 OF 2011 Aditi Sachin Mhatre .. Applicant vs 1. The State of Maharashtra 2. Sachin Ramesh Mhatre .. Respondents Mr.Satyavrat Joshi i.b. M/s Vidhi Partners for Applicant Mr.S.A.Shaikh APP for State CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J DATE: 13 th September, 2011 P.C. 1. In an on going litigation under section 498 A of the IPC the wife, a well educated lady, gainfully employed seeks transfer on the ground that her husband is a influential person and exerts threats to her. 2. These aspects are indeed indicated in the earlier prosecution, when interview to the child, could not be given due to unforseen - 2 - 861 reasons, the wife claimed that the husband and family members banged the door of her house for custody and harassed her. 3. Stage of the case is for evidence of the Applicant. The learned Judge being seized with the matter shall also ensure about the safety of the Petitioner Smt Aditi Sachin Mhatre and also warn the husband Sachin Mhatre not to create controversial situation by contaminating the atmosphere. 3. With above indication, Petition seeking transfer dismissed. K.U.CHANDIWAL, J