IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc No. M-17552 of 2009 Date of decision : 20.07.2009 Sita Devi and Others ....Petitioner V/s State of Punjab and another ....Respondents BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Aman Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG Punjab. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) Contends that petitioner No. 2 and respondent No. 3 have married each other against the wishes of other parents. Consequently, FIR under Sections 363, 366 and 120-B IPC was lodged by father of Kavita Devi (respondent No.2). According to the counsel, both petitioner No. 2 and respondent No. 3 are living together at the moment. Thus, no offence under Sections 363, 366 and 120-B IPC is made out against the petitioners. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from Head Constable Sita Ram, who is present in Court submits that the fact that petitioner No. 2 and respondent No. 3 have married each other shall be taken into consideration by the investigating officer and that there is every likelihood that a cancellation report shall be submitted to the competent court of jurisdiction shortly. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the State, no cause of action survives in this petition and the same is dismissed as such. 20.07.2009 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE