IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.21945 of 2010 1. BAMBAM YADAV & 2. Pawan Yadav, both son sof Chandradeo Yadav Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 29.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under section 366 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioners is that they along with others kidnapped the daughter of the informant. But, during investigation, it transpired that it was one Gautam Kumar,who had kidnapped the girl, in question, for the purpose of marriage. In view of such, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria, in connection with Gogri P.S. Case No. 203 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not accused in any other case and, if they are, they shall not be released on bail, (iii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground - 2 - of misuse,(iv) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)