MC 2311/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard the learned counsel for the applicants as well as the learned Sr. counsel appearing for the sole respondent. The applicants by the present application is praying for condonation of delay of 380 days in preferring the revision petition against the judgment and d ecree dated 09.03.2009 passed by the learned Addl. District Judge No.1 (FTC), Ti nsukia, in Title Appeal No.12/2007, whereby and whereunder while dismissing the appeal preferred by the predecessor-in-interest of the present petitioners, the judgment and decree dated 12.04.2007 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Divi sion) (FTC), Tinsukia, in Title Suit No.35/2003 decreeing the suit in favour of the present respondent/plaintiff, has been affirmed. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the averments made in the application and also the affidavit-in-opposition filed ob jecting the prayer for condonation of delay, I am of the view that the applicant s were prevented by sufficient cause in not preferring the revision petition in time. Hence the delay occurred is condoned. Misc. case stands disposed of.