IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15786 of 2009 1. ASHOK KHARGA,son of Akloo Kharga 2. Rajiv Kharga,son of Ashok Kharga 3. Pawan Kharga,son of Ashok Kharga All are resident of Pandaul Bazar, P.S.-Pandaul,District-Madhubani. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 12-05-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that for the land dispute of the petitioners with the informant’s employee, this case has been lodged with the allegation of abuse in the name of the caste Harizan to humiliate but subsequent also similar allegation was levelled by her to favour her employer. There may not be so much so substance in the allegation for maintainability of the anticipatory bail which comes in the way to allow the petitioners on bail. Their prayer made for anticipatory bail is rejected as not maintainable. Petitioners are advised to appear in the court concerned and pray for regular bail, which shall be decided on the same day keeping in view the nature of the allegation without being prejudiced by this rejection order. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )