IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. no.M-8909 of 2011 (O&M) Decided on : 27-07-2011 District Karnal Brahaman Sabha, Karnal ....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Mr. Yogesh Choudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Mann, Sr. DAG, Haryana Ms. Sharmila Sharma, Advocate for the respondent MAHESH GROVER, J After hearing learned counsel for the parties, I am of the considered opinion that the prayer which has been made in the instant petition under the garb of Section 482 Cr.P.C cannot be answered. It is the job of the administrative authorities to look into the threat perception and grievance of the petitioner. Hence, dismissed. It is contended before this Court that Senior Superintendent of Police concerned has been apprised of the situation. If that be so, he is at liberty to evaluate the threat perception and to take action in accordance with law. July 27, 2011 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge