- 1 - chs.2084.2011 skt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 2084 OF 2011 IN SUMMOND FOR JUDGMENT NO. 68 OF 2011 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 135 OF 2011 Vodafone Essar Limited ..Plaintiff -Versus- Enercon (India) Limited ..Defendant .......... Mr. Punit Anand for the Plaintiff. Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar i/b M/s. Lokhandwala & Co. for the Defendant. .......... CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 21ST DECEMBER 2011. P.C. Not on board. Mentioned. 1 It is not permissible for a party to state on affidavit what was stated by a Court when the same does not find place in the order. 2 The order of the Division Bench in Appeal No. 712 of 2011, dated 28th November 2011 reads as under : “At the request of the learned Advocate for the appellant allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh.” - 2 - chs.2084.2011 3 A plain reading of the order indicates that the appellant was entitled to file a fresh appeal. 4 The appeal having been disposed of, it is not open to me to grant an extension of time to deposit. The Chamber Summons is accordingly dismissed. -