9— $imaLE gmma: ' (1) IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHA TTISGARH JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR W.p.(c) No. §§$9~ /2o11 v/ PETITIONER .- Mangal Das € W/O Shri Nanadas Aged about 60 years .........(2/? \Jr’ Occupation Kotwar (3) Chief Executive Officer New Raipur Development Authority Telz' bandha Jedhi Vila Near Nation Garage Ring Road Raipur al ‘iiitggggex Village TahsilAarang gummy ”"' Dist — Raipur (C.G.) / N B. K - \%n\ / \0" xf’a‘ia w VERSUS «W RESPONDENTS: (1) State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary , ‘ Department of Revenue Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur ( C.G.) V J. (2) Collector, Raipur Dist—Raipur (C.G.) Dist Raipur ( C.G.} K WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226(227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA $L( HYGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT RH ,ASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No. 5982 of2011 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’hle Shri Satish K. Agnihntrivl Present: Ms. Deepali Pandey: Advocate for the petitioner, Shn' V‘V.S.Moorihy, Deputy Advocate General for the Stale. Shn Sumesh Bajaj, Advocaxe for the respondent Nor 3. $" “A ORDER “)RAL} (Passed on 10 day ofOctober, 201 1) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the respondents may be directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner for allotment of alternative land in compliance ofthe directions ofthe Adarsh Rehabilitation policy of the Chhattisgarh State, 2007 and therealter, acquire the land granted to the petitioner, as service land. 2. Ms. Pandey further submits that in an identical matter Le, Kotwar Assocz‘an'on 0fChattz‘sgarh v. State ofChhattisgarh d’: Others’, this Court has disposed of the petition of the Kotwar Association by giving the members an opportunity to file individual applications/ representations with a direction to consider and decide the same in accordance with law and in accordance with the provisions of the Adarsh Rehabilitation policy of the Chhattisgarh State, 2007. Thusg this petition may also be disposed of in the same terms. .....‘iyyiftQ No. 7524i2009, decided on 12.01.2010 PETITIONER Mangal Das. VERSI IS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & f$‘ Amit i 9 § Leamed counsel appearing for other side do not controvert the above $ubm1'ssion and submit that they have no objection if the petition is disposed of in terms of the order passed in Kotwar Association QfChhattisgarh (supra). 1n View of the above submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, this petition is disposed of in terms of the order passed in Kotwar Association ofChhamsgarh (supra) Ila. the petitioner may file a hesh application before the appropriate authority in accordance with law for grant of patta/allotment of land and if such application is filed, it. shall be disposed of by the concerned authority in accordance with the revenue laws and also keeping in mind the provisions of the Adarsh Rehabilitation policy ofthe Chhattisgarh State, 2007. Sd/— SATISH K. ANGNH-IORI Judge u).