IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITON NO.2031 OF 2004 WRIT PETITON NO.2031 OF 2004 WRIT PETITON NO.2031 OF 2004 Miss K. Poorna Pushkala ..Petitioner. V/s. M/s.G.N.A.Duraparts ..Respondent. Mr.Suresh Bhosle for petitioner. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. DATED : 27TH MARCH, 2006. DATED : 27TH MARCH, 2006. DATED : 27TH MARCH, 2006. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. No case is made out to interfere with the impugned order. The view taken by the Labour Court is a reasonable and possible view. The impugned order cannot be said to be a perverse order. Hence the petitioner is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. 2. At this stage, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner prayed that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the amount. Accordingly, the petitioner is allowed to withdraw the money. The Labour Court is directed to hand over the said amount by an account payee cheque to the petitioner. 3. Petition stands disposed of in terms of this order with no order as to costs. *****