BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Tenth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.13435 of 2011 1 THANNAYIRAM 2 MARUTHUPANDI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NOS.1 & 2 Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE POOVANTHI POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. A.RAHUL Advocate For Respondent : M/S. K.S.DURAI PANDY, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police, for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of I.P.C., have come forward with this Petition seeking for anticipatory bail. 2. Though the petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of I.P.C., the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that neither a case is registered nor a petition is pending with the respondent and the apprehension of arrest is baseless. 3. Considering the above rival submissions and since the apprehension of arrest is baseless, the Petition is dismissed. sd/- 10/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 2 THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE POOVANTHI POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S. A.RAHUL Advocate SR.No.35117 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13435 of 2011 Date :10/10/2011 SMA/12.10.2011/4C/1P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/