IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 23RD DECEMBER 2011 / 2ND POUSHA 1933 WP(C).No. 34850 of 2011(E) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- 1. S. VIDHUSEKHAR, S/O. SATHYANATHAN C., “LALYANALAYAM”, OLD THEVARA ROAD, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN - 16. 2. RAHUL P.M., PULLUMKATTIL HOUSE, P.O. PULLUT, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. HARISH MURALIDHAR, LAKSHMI KRIPA, MAYANNUR, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.K.I.SAGEER RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. CALICUT UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY, THENNIPALAM P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, THENNIPPALAM, MALAPPURAM. 3. VICE CHANCELLOR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, THENNIPPALAM, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 34850/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THEAPPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 01/11/2011. P2: COPY OF THE APPLICAFTION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 06/11/2011. P3: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER DATED RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).34850/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners applied for revaluation of some papers in the 5th semester B.Tech Examination vide Exts.P1 to P3 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4.Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs