IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN MONDAY, THE 30TH AUGUST 2010 / 8TH BHADRA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 969 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN MA.506/2009 Dated 24/07/2009 .................... PETITIONER/2ND APPELLANT IN MAT.A.NO.506/2009 ------------------------------------------------- VARKEY MATHEW, S/O.P.V.MATHEW, AGED 57, RESIDING AT PERUNTHEKARY HOUSE, ERAYILKADAVU P.O., MUTTAMBALAM VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM TALUK, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.SIBY MATHEW SRI.PHILIP J.VETTICKATTU RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT IN MAT A NO.506/2009 ---------------------------------------------- LALIT RAJU PLATHOTTAM, S/O.P.RAJU SAM, AGED 31, RESIDING AT PLATHOTTAM HOUSE, PAIVALLY BHAGOM, OMALLOOR VILLAGE, KOZHENCHERRY, PATHANAMTHITTA. ADV. SRI.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE FOR R1 SRI.K.O.MANUEL (KOPRAMB) FOR R1 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. .................................................................... C.O.C. No.969 of 2010 .................................................................... Dated this the 30th day of August, 2010. JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Contempt is filed for the reason that custody of the child was not given by the respondent to the maternal grandparents in terms of the judgment of this court. Violation alleged is for two months. Counsel for the respondent submitted that child was not keeping well and based on medical advice only custody was not given to grandparents strictly in terms of the judgment. However, later custody was given and child was returned by the contempt petitioner. Recording this submission we drop the contempt proceedings. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge K.SURENDRA MOHAN Judge pms