S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 2070/2006 Sahab Ram Vs. Civil Judge (Sr. Div.) Raisinghnagar & Anr. DATE OF ORDER :: 07.09.2007 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. J.R. Beniwal, for the petitioner. Mr. G.R. Gora, for the respondents. .... An application is preferred by the petitioner stating as follows: “1. That the applicant / petitioner preferred the aforesaid writ petition against the order date 25.7.2002 & 24.7.2005, which is pending under consideration. 2. That in the present case, the respondent entered into compromise with the applicant. 3. That in view of the compromise, the applicant paid all the relevant decreetal amount to the private respondent. 4. That in view of the compromise, there is no dispute between the parties.” Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute the contents of the application including the fact that entire decreetal amount has been paid to the respondent No.2. In view of the facts stated in the application and accepted by counsel for the respondents I am satisfied that the issue involved in this petition for writ has been resolved by the parties by compromise. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. (GOVIND MATHUR ),J. jgoyal