THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH CONTEMPAT CASE NO:1843 of 2011 DATE:20.09.2011 BETWEEN PAKAM BHASKAR …PETITIONER AND THE DEPOT MANAGER, APSRTC & OTHERS …RESPONDENTS. THIS COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH CONTEMPAT CASE NO:1843 of 2010 ORDER: The present contempt case is filed by the petitioner- workman seeking to punish the respondents under sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Court Act for non implementation of the order of this Court dated 6.4.2010 in W.P.M.P.No:2979 of 2010 in W.P.No:20595 of 2003. The writ petition is filed by the petitioners-Management seeking for issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for the records relating to the award passed in I.D.No:307 of 1998, dated 1.11.2010 on the file of the Labour Court, Guntur and to set aside the same. In the said writ petition, the 1st respondent-workman filed W.P.M.P.No:2979 of 2010 seeking for a direction to the respondents in the writ petition not to make any deductions from his salary with following the procedure and to direct the writ petitioners-management to pay the illegal and unauthorized deducted amounts so far made from his slary. By order dated 6.4.2010, this Court granted the interim direction as prayed for. Heard the learned counsel. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner- workman that the order passed by this Court has not been complied with and therefore, the respondents are liable for punishment under the provisions of section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act. While placing a copy of the letter in E1./DSP/E5/372 (3)/03- RM (NLR, dated 13.9.2011 issued by the A.P State Road Transport Corporation, Nellore Region wherein it is stated that the deduction from the salary of the employee was stopped long back and and the Depot Manager, Sullurpet has ordered to refund an amount of Rs.20,000/- to Sri P.Bhaskar E.No:514230, Driver of Sullurpet Depot (presently working as Driver in Nellore II Depot) and thereby the interim order , dated 6.4.2010 in W.P.M.P.No:2979 in W.P.No:20595 of 2003 was complied with by the Depot Manager, Sullurpet, it is submitted by the learned Standing Counsel for the Management that the contempt case is liable tobe closed. On the other hand, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner-workman that though he does not dispute the letter, but he wants to get instructions as to whether such refund is made or not. However, in the present facts and circumstances of the case coupled with the letter No:E1/DSP/E5/372(3)/03-RM (NLR), dated 13.9.2011, this Court is of the view that it is not a fit case to wait for such instructions. In the circumstances, the question of the alleged acts on the part of the management amounting to contemptuous in nature, does not arise and thereby, the contempt case is liable to be closed. Accordingly, this contempt case is closed. No costs. No costs. _________________ Justice G.Chandraiah. Gurc. Date:20.09.2011 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH CONTEMPAT CASE NO:1843 of 2010 DATE:20.09.2011