1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 910 OF 2010 Mrs. Vanna Claire Kaura ... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Abbas Mooktikar with Luann Grasto for the Applicant. Mr. J. P. Kharge, A.P.P. for the Respondent No.1-State. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : March 26, 2010. P.C. Since no order prejudicial to the interest of the Respondents, is being passed, the notice to the said Respondents, is waived. 2. The limited reliefs that is claimed in the present Application is for expeditious disposal of the Revision pending before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune. 3. From the Roznama annexed to the Application, it is found that the Revision Application is pending since 2006, and that the matter also been heard on some dates and also the Judgments on which the 2 parties rely are submitted before the learned Revision Court. 4. In that view of the matter, the Application stands disposed of with a directions to the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune to hear and decide the Criminal Revision Application Nos. 955 of 2006 and 24 of 2007, as expeditiously as possible, and in any case within a period of three months from today. [ B.R. GAVAI, J. ]