IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 7TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 16TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 24990 of 2010(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- PAULOSE THOMAS, S/O.LATE THOMAS, AGED 57 YEARS, CHITTAYATHU HOUSE, NELLIMATTOM P.O. KOTHAMANGALAM. BY ADV. SRI.JOHN JOSEPH(ROY) RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES COMMISSION, STATE OFFICE (KERALA), M.G.ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER, DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE, KADAVANTHARA, ERNAKULAM. ADV. SRI.K.KESAVAN KUTTY,SC,KVIC FOR R1 GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 24990 OF 2010 (W) ===================== Dated this the 7th day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T According to the petitioner, he made an application to the 1st respondent for financial assistance and approval of the scheme for the installation of a M Sand Unit. It is stated that although all procedural formalities have been complied with, he is likely to be excluded when interviews are held for the prospective applicants. It is with this grievance, the writ petition is filed. On 13th of August, 2010, this matter came up for orders. Standing counsel for the 1st respondent submitted that they had no intention to exclude the petitioner from consideration as and when interview of the applicants is held. This submission made by the learned standing counsel is reiterated today also. It is therefore evident that the 1st respondent will consider the application made by the petitioner and the petitioner will also be interviewed. If that be so, the apprehension on the basis of which the petitioner has filed this writ petition is unfounded and recording the submission of the standing counsel as above, the writ petition is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp