K‘4 ‘w/waaw mgrg @ G 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. PJS) NO. ”yrs / I20 1 1 PETITIONER : / Rajendra Chandravanshi S/o late Shri Badri Bishal Chandravanshi, aged about 43 years, R/o C-242, Rohinipuram, Raipur(C.G.) . VERSUS RESPONDENTS X1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, Department of Cooperation, D.K.S. Bhavan, Rajpur (C.G.) /2. Registrar, Co—operative Societies, Raipur (C.G.) /~ 3. District Co‘operative‘ Central Bank Ltd. Raipur (C.G.) Through Chief Executive Officer WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K Aqnihotri & Hon’ble Shri Radhe Shyam Sharma‘ JJ. W.P. (S) No. 370/2011 Petitioner' Rajendra Chandravanshi Vs. Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and others. Present: Shri Sunil Otwani, counsel for the petitioner. ‘Shri MPS Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the Statel respondents 1 & 2. Shri SC Verma, counsel for respondent No.3. ORAL ORDE R (21.11.2011) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that issue involved herein is the validity and constitutionality of Rule 7 of the Chhattisgarh Ke Jila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Karamchari Sewa Niyojan, Nibandhan Tatha Unki Karya Esthithi) Niyam, 1982 (for short “the Rules, 1982”), which came up for consideration before this Court in Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Employee Sangh & Another v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others1. 2. This Court after having considered the facts and hearing learned counsel for all the parties, held that Rule 7 is ultra vires and accordingly Rule 7 of the Rules 1982 was struck down in Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Employee Sangh (supra). \ 1 WP (S) No.2133 of 2011 (decided on 4-8-201 1) .W According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, this matter couid not be disposed of along with Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Employee Sangh (supra), as this case was not listed on the said date. Thus, this matter may also be disposed in the same terms. Learned counsel for the respondents are not in a position to controvert the facts involved in the matter. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and hearing Iearned counsei for the parties, nothing remains to be argued again on the same issue. Thus, the petition is disposed of in the same terms as passed in Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Employee Sangh (supra) holding that Ruie 7 of the Rules, 1982 is already struck down. There shaii be no order asto costs. t Sd/-' i Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri t Radhe Shyam Sharma Judge i Judge