IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.595 OF 2008 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.2590 OF 1991 Umesh Kumar D. Sharma ....Plaintiff V/s. Ramanand B. Harlalka ....Defendant Mr.S.M. Poddar for the Plaintiff. Mr.R.C. Dhuru for the Defendant. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 9TH JULY, 2008. P.C. : 1. It is not possible for me to consider the application for leave to file the written statement. 2. The suit had already been decreed. A Notice of Motion for setting aside an ex-parte decree was dismissed. The Appellate Court however, by an order dated 28.3.1997 put the Defendant to terms as regards the deposit, set-aside an ex-parte decree and subsequently ordered the Defendant to file the written statement within two weeks from the date of restoration of the suit. Admittedly, the written statement has not been filed within the time prescribed by the Division Bench. The order having been passed by the Division Bench, it is not open to me to grant the reliefs claimed in the Chamber Summons. 3. In the circumstances, the Chamber Summons is dismissed.