HIGH COURT OF CHHATT1SGARH. BILASPUR S.B.: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTiCE SUNIL KUMAR SINHA CONTEMPT CASE fC) N0.123/2010 PETJTIONER T.K. Yogi. aged about 51 years, S/o Shri Saket Bihari Yogi, Occupation- Sen/ice, Sub-Engineer at Janpad Panchayat, Bhaiyathan, District- Surguja. VERSUS RESPONDENT Shri Jevias Minj, S/o not known to the petitioner, aged about 50 years, Occupation- Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearajice: Mrs. Hamida Siddqui and Mr. M.B. Gupta, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. Sumesh Bajaj, Advocate for the respondent. ORAL ORDER (18.08.2010) SUNILKUMARSINHA.J. Heard finally with the consent of the parties. Petitioner- T.K. Yogi has filed this petition for initiation of proceedings of contempt against the respondent for willful disobedience in compliance of the order dated 29.01.2010 passed by this Court in W.P. (S) N0. 6019 / 2008. At the very outset, Mr. Sumesh Bajaj, learned counsel for the respondent, submits that the order dated 29.01.2010 has already been complied on 24.07.2010 and the petitioner has been repatriated to his parent's department. He fumishes the copy of order dated 24.07.10 & 25.07.10. A perusal of the aforesaid orders would show that the order dated 29.01.2010 passed by this Court has been duty complied with, but there is some delay in compliance of the said order. Mr. Bajaj submits that the delay is not intentional, as the same occurred on account of various processes to be under taken for the purposes of the repatriation. Therefore, such delay in compliance of the order dated 29.01.2010 may kindly be condoned. In the above facts and circumstance of the case, when the order dated 29.01.2010 has already been complied with and the deiay appears to be bonafide, 1 do not deem it appropriate to proceed further in the matter. The proceeding of the contempt, therefore, is dropped at this stage. Sd/- _. SunilKumarSinha judge /!