1 Ash FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1224 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8167 OF 2004 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri Nikhil Karnawat for the Applicants. Shri S.N. Chandrachood for the Respondents. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 26TH APRIL, 2010 P.C.: . Heard the Learned Counsel appearing for the Applicants and the Learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents. The application has been opposed by the learned counsel appearing for the Respondents by contending that the Petition need not be restored as against the Respondent No.2 as the presence of the Respondent No.2 in the Writ Petition was merely an ornamental. He states that the Respondent No.2 is a formal party. The Writ Petition was dismissed against the 2nd Respondent on the ground that no steps were taken 2 for bringing legal representatives of the said Respondent on record. The Civil Application No.1225 of 2010 discloses that the 2nd Respondent died on 11th January, 2010. The said Civil Application is filed within limitation for bringing the heirs of the 2nd Respondent on record. In the circumstances, the case is made out for restoration of the writ petition as against the 2nd Respondent. Accordingly, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). (A.S.OKA, J)