m mm fgérm W.P. “0.6859 of 2008 Petitioner Dr. V. . Mehata, Sjo late Shri B.L. Mchata, aged bout 63 years, R/o Goushala road, Police ine, Raigarh, Distt—Raigarh Versus Respondents 1. State f Chhattisgarh, through —Secretary, Health and Family WeHare Department, D.K.S. Bhaw , Raipur (CG) ’2. Direct r, Smchanalaya, Chikitsa Shiksha, Old N ses Hostel, D.K.S. Bhawan Campue, Rajp (CG) Civil Surgeon cum Chief Hospital Supe ' tendent, KG. Hospital, Raigarh, DiStt- Raigar (CG) Writ Petition under Artie! 226 of the Constitution of India S.B. Hon’ble’ Shri Dhirendra shra, J i 08. 12.2008 CD Mr. Sanjay Patel, counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel La‘wyer for the State. Heard. The petitioner, who is appointed as Assistant Surgeon vide order of Annexure P-l dated 27th Jan uaiy 2006, has filed the instant petition for direction to respondent No.1/State to reimburse the bills towards his medical treatment & traveling allowances for which he is entitled as a Govt. employee. Leamed counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was re~appointed on contract basis after retirement and posted in District Hospital, Raigarh. The petitioner suffered severe heart attack WEE! Wstiéw mmmm mmwiwm mm , ,2 _ agmqaném and he was refeITed to Escort, Htart Hospital, Raipur by the respondent No.3. From Raiptr Hospital, he was again roferred to Delhi Escort Heart Hospital by the respondent No.3. The petitioner v submitte his medical tre nt bills as well as traveling allowances bills in the prescribed form vide Annexure P-2. His above bills were u foarded by th res dent No.3 vide rder f Annexure P—3 dated 0 200 Howee above ls towards medica treatment dly rw e p n o o 1 9 7 vr e bil l and traveg awances ha not been settle Learnd counse fo t Stat subms that peioner tiles &esh represntan for s lement of is above bs before the respondent No1 along w copy of this orde the s shall be conSier and died b the reondent Wih a further p d t ieip t ti In Vie o the above iss10n of learned cousel for the State, the instat petition is dspo of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representato for se ment of his bills towards his medical treatment 8a traveling allo e before the responent No. 1 along with copy of this order. n such resentation being ade, the espondent No.1 hall decide he a its own merit i ccordance with law as early as possle preferab Wih a period of 8 weeks fm the date of receipt of the representa Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge [new d a e a lin llo v d e l r h e it 1f the tti etio e t h ill . i r ame ded eCd v sp No 1 tin eriod of 8 weeks n‘om the e of cet of he representaon w f s m n n is d in t e w c d O r p m r s t sme o 1b l tin ro tio . s n a N?