1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 1529 of 2010 Rinku Shankarrao Pantawane ..VERSUS.. State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O., P.S., Ajni, Nagpur. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. Prafulla Mohagaonkar , Advocate for the applicant. Mr. A.S.Parihar, A.P.P. for the respondent. CORAM : Prasanna B. Varale, J. DATED : 07 th Octo ber , 2010 . Heard. This is an application filed by the applicant for grant of bail in Crime No. 104/2010 registered at Police Station, Ajni, Nagpur for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of I.P.C. The victim of the offence is one Narayan and the report came to be lodged by his mother Smt. Lilabai. Learned Advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant is falsely implicated and he is roped only on suspicion in the said crime. He further submits that there is no mention of the applicant in the First Information Report, lodged by the complainant. According to the applicant, there is no material with the prosecution and no purpose would be served by keeping the applicant behind the bars. He, therefore, prayed for grant of bail to the applicant. The reply is filed by learned APP. He produced before the Court the case diary for perusal. I have perused the reply and the record produced before the Court. It is seen that the investigating agency has recorded the statement of witnesses namely Smt. Chhapabai Malmkar and Amit 2 Vishnukar, which discloses that they saw the applicant on the spot at the time of the incident. These statements clearly establishes the presence of the applicant. The statements of other witnesses mentions that the applicant along with other accused persons had threatened the victim. The record shows that there is prima facie material against the applicant to connect him in the said offence. In my opinion, no case is made out by the applicant for grant of bail. In the result, the application is rejected. Learned Advocate for the applicant has made a grievance that inspite of repeated directions by the trial court, the prosecution is not taking steps to produce the muddemal, C.A. report etc. Learned APP undertakes to instruct the officer concerned for taking steps in the matter and to see that the trial is commenced at the earliest. With above directions, Criminal Application is disposed of. JUDGE Diwale