g^%^'^.^-- ^^ IN THEHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATBILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0 ^/^ /2005 PETITIONER ^ ..•^'^•;\"^-''' ^?^' ._6V' t y ^ Kamal Dhar Patel Son ofShriThanda Ram Patel Aged about 61 years Resident of Jhul Kadam Shakti, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ^'^" ^' RESPONDENT VERSUS f 1 2. /3. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Sehool Education D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur, Chhattisgarh Director Publiclnstructions Raipur, Chhattisgarh District Education Q.gteer Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh PETITION UNDER ARTICLE / 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FORTHE ISSUANCE OF WRmN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITOR WRITS, ORDER OR ORDERS. DIRECTION ORDIRECTIONS t:fiili XI-HC-22 ^ .. ^^•^rraRig.^Tlly'hi.facii'Hy lilW'ff.!»)*)!<*.^^j^I^iM]g(^oqr '"""""""""""""""WI. 200 • ^ sn^s'sei R-)i?h Sf^S ^)H ^fe^ ^IA.Y:/ ly'-f^^ ^w •^ly' aiita'FRnwafer 9-12-2005 Shn Sanjay Kumar Agrawal, ShnVivek Sharma, PanelLawyei' Heard.• . - : . ^ . counfeel forlhei peUtioner., Ifortlie State, dn^advancecopy. Counsel for the petitioner gubaui( .-'umexure P-1 dated 22-11-200.5 and retirernent. He further submitg that transl Having Considere4 and without e: firom today and on sueh representatj respondents shall decide the same pn its] possible preferably within two tnoirihs firj made clear tfaat if any grievanGe ranam| underttielaw. Counsel further submita -that_the aBowed to continue tiB the decision offliel 'mfn<flt Hi*)inif.'tf.'fstzt-tfa^l< ^3iN'I3Ii^I , that the petitioner has been traiisferred as per submits that onlv 7 months are lefi for tus 'erhas been shown to .be.on ys'request but he did not make any such request. He furth^r submits fhat the tratisfer Kas beehmade during banperiod. ^ . .pressing any opmion on fhe' m^its'of the case, in tbe opinion of this Gourt, ends ofju^tice'wiB tis setved if^a direction is given t6 the. petitioner t6 make a defailed representa^on raising Us grievanees before the competent aufhority of respondents along with a eo^y oft&e petition and ttns order wuliin 15 da}'s on bemg /Qed, the conipetent authonty df bvvii merits in accordance with law as earlv as >m the date of receipt of the Tepresentation. It » 1, fhetpetitioner iuay avail' the-iemedy. available Ipetitioner has not been relieved and he may be Irepresentatoon. ~ It is direoted that if the petition^r has not been relieved^ he may be 'aUbwed to continue titl ttie representation is decided. With'the aforesaid observatioas,t^is pefition sta'ads disposed of. Consequentfy M.W.P.No. 4884J/2005 andlA. No. 10170/2005 .also stand disposedof. - , . -Gertified copv as perniles. Fakhruddin Judge ^.S^^SE