I-HG—78 (^h ^' *111Crll WHT^» ^TT<iNi<n^, y>til^<i<o, {®ldl1yi|,< —....c.'i.i...M?....•^200 ^t?T TT5R? ('^rf^5^) 3?T7^T^T ^Jcf) ^TSTT 'STT^T 5JRW .(", ^n. \ ?^W3crf^T 3TT^r HiGH COURT OP OHHAT-TISGARH AT BILASPUR dYILRE^lSlQN No. 49/2003 PETiTIONBR PLAJNTIFF ^rawsll Versus Sitarai^i; Agraw^l Sakti, (Chhat i|i, aged aboiit 76 years, S/'o Kishapdal occupation Busniess, resident of ^/ard No.12, Tehsil Sakti, Distdct Jaiijgii' tisgarh) RESPONDBNT DEFENDANTS Legal|Repres€ntatives of Late Lachhiram, S/'o Kishajo.lal Agi-awal 1. Baiiattin Bai, aged aboiit 71 yeai's, Widow of Lachl^iroiii Agrawal 2. 3. 7. Bhag^a.thi; 1 to Tehsit 6< Amriifca ^ 'RTWff'? ft^t <P»l^i< ^»'3fRm3T^T yeai's, S/'o aged about 43 LachI|Liram Agrawal Gova^dhaii Prasad Alias Goddu, aged about 40 years| S/o Laclihii'am Agrawal Dilip Lach1 Kumar, aged about 34 years, S/o iram Agrawal Satis^i Kumai', aged about 31 yeai's, S/o Lachl^irp.iu Agrav^al 5 are residents of Sakti, Ward No.12, Sakti District Janjgir (Chhattisgarh) Bai, aged about 50 years, W/o Man^uram, occupation Hozise Wife, fhrough Sajanj Cloth Stores, Siation Road, Kharsiya, TehsiJ. Kharsiya, District Raigarh (ChhattisgaTh) Tai-al|ai AgTawal, aged about 48 years, W/o Govi4dam tlirough Subhash General Stores, MaiajRoad, Katghora, Tehsil Katgliora, Disfrict Korb^. (Chhattisgam) ! IG—78 ^TT^RT'5RT f^TW TT^ff 37T^T ^RN? to2 -"^.' ^r r<jjq«n^^ <t9tii^4i<o, f^<ni^y HWVll »»*?1<»» Wt 200 3n^i T^w Ci?^^) ^•WIW lRf^[3TI^?T -2, 8. 9. atu lNaray< W/Q Gondiyt Kirau B w/o Rui 7a|3i Devi Agrawal, aged about 35 years, Si^resh Kumar, resident of Phulpiir Raod, ^ (Maliarashtra) [umad Agrawal, aged about 30 years, S}iaiikarlai Agrawal, Netaji Puniiture & Bt|aiidaj:, Naila, District Jajijgir-Chajmpa (Chiiatsjisgaiii) uu. Dhaiimlati, Kiiiaar Rui (Chha-tt|is MEMO OF CIViL RBVISiON UNDBR SECTION 115 OP CODE OF CIVIL Bymidai' PftOCEDURE OR^IL O RD E R 2&-fi-2008 SB: HON?BLE SHRI DHlKBSDlrtA aiISHRA.J Mr. H.S. Patel, counsel foj Heard, LearD.ed counsel for tlie p| as flie saine is not mauitaiiiabld with tibeity to me appropiiate p3 Accordingly, tlie petition i^ prayed for. Leaiiied counsel for tlie p( ofthe impugned order may be Office is directed fo retuj petitioner on his funiishmg <=bj^id41t1 J^I^i ^ fe^ <f^i^$i< iR'sffimw^r ati, aged about 27 yeara, W/'o Pawaa Agrawal, resident of Netaji Fumiture & Naila, Disuict Jao.jgu'-Champa Isgarh) Uie petitioner, ?titioner seeks to wifiidraw this petition m view offhe Section 115 ofthe C.P.C. loceeclmgs available iiuder the law. dismissed as wimdrawn wim liberty as |titioner further prays that certi&ed copy Ntuni to hiin. ^ii copy of Uie iaipugned order to tlie true copy ot tlie same,_ Sd/- DhirendraMishra; Judge autilenticated .s*