44 % 18.12.2009 Present: Mr Muni sh Mehra with Mr Shantanu Sahay, Advocates for the plaintiffs. Mr Anil Kher, Sr Advocate with Mr D R Bhatia for the defendants. +IA No. 16381/2009 (under 0.23 R.3 CPC) * This is an application jointly preferred by the plaintiffs and the defendants for bringing on record a settlement arrived at between them under the provisions of Order 23 Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the CPC. The terms of the settlement are contained in Paragraphs 2 to 10 of the captioned application. The application has been signed by the constituted attorney of plaintiff nos. I and 2, and the authorized representative of the defendant i.e., Mr Palash '"'· Aggrawal. I have perused the contents of the application, the same are lawful. In terms of the settlement, amongst other obligations undertaken by the defendant; the defendant is required to pay a sum of Rs 7,90,000/- to the plaintiff after deducting the tax at source. Accordingly, a demand draft bearing no. 137893 dated 17.12.2009 drawn on ICICI Bank, Connaught Place Branch, New Delhi in the sum of Rs 7,11,000/- has been handed over to the learned counsel for the plaintiff in Court, by learned counsel for the defendant. The suit is decreed in terms of the settlement arrived at between the plaintiffs and defendant. A decree sheet be drawn up. The captioned application shall form part of the decree. In view of the compromise arrived at between the plaintiffs and the defendant; CS(OS) No. 1964/2009 Page 1 of 2 • Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified ) the defendants shall be entitled to release of its material seized and sealed, including computers and hard discs, by the Local Commissioner by virtue of the orders of this Court. The application is disposed of CSCOS) No. 1964/2009 Learned counsel for the plaintiffs says that he wishes to delete defendant no.I from the array of parties. He also prays for disposal of the suit in terms of the compromise arrived at between the plaintiffs and defendants as reflected in IA No. 16381/2009. It is ordered accordingly. The suit is decreed in terms of the orders passed in IA No. 16381/2009. Defendant no.2 will be shown as the only defendant. DECEMBER 18, 2009 mb CS(OS) No. 1964/2009 RAJIV SHAKDHER, J Page 2 of 2