IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4018 of 2010 UMESH SAHNI SON OF VIMAL SAHNI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15/02/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that for misuse of privilege of bail for a period of 14 years, the petitioner has remained in custody since 10.7.2009, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Jai Ram Prasad, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Brahampura P.S. Case No. 159 of 1992, G.R. No. 3203 of 1992, T.R. No. 3229 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, 2 his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)