'^ HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WR1T PETITION (S) No. 2S34 of 2007 Petitioners 1. 2. 3. 4. 5, 6. 7. 8. Versus 1. 2. 3. Manharan Lal Sahu S/o Shri Sonsay Sahu, Age about 41 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. PrimarySchool, Miroheed, Biock - Bilaigarh, Distt.-Raipur (C.G.) Bhuwan Lal Sahu S/'o Shri Manik Das Sahu, fi^e about 41 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Hr. Sec. Schooi, Tundri, Block - Bilaigarh, Distt.-Raipur (C.G.) Bhusatyaj Lai Chawarguwal S/o Shri Jaiiu Ram Chawarguwa!, Age about 42 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Hr. Sec. Schoo!, Tundri, Btock- Biiaigarh, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) Manharan Lal Amiiwar S/o Shri Bhagat Ram, Age about 40 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Odkakan, Block - Bilaigarh, DistS.-Raipur (C.G.) _ _^ _^ ^^ Dilip Kumar Ohdar S/o Shri Biharu Ram, Age about 38 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary Schoo!, Jaitpur, Block - Bilaigarh, Distt.-Raipur (C.G.) Harl Shankar Sahu, S/o Shri Ram Ratan Sahu, Age abot 30 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Boys Primary Schooi, Paoni, Block - Biiaigarh, Distt.-Raipur (C.G.) Ram Swarup Sahu S/o Shri Brij Ram Sahu, Age about 33 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Boys PrimarySchool, Paoni, block - Bilaigarh, Distt.-Raipur (C.G.) Mohan Lai Sahu S/o Shri Sadhu Ram Sahu, Age about 35 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary Schoo!, Mohater, B!ock - Biiaigarh, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) State Govi. of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary, Schooi Education Department, Ministry, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C..G.) District EducationOfficer, Raipur (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Bilaigarh, Distt.- Raipur(C.G.) WRiT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTiON OF INDiA Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri Present: Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Vinay Pandey, Panel Lawyer for the State / respondents. (Passed on 10th day of lyiay, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as weil as for the State/respondents jointiy submit that the fact and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipa! Corporation, Durg and another {2005 (il) MPJR-CG 96}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents does not controvert the said submission. In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Venna vs. TheState Govt. of Chhattisgarh and another) and other connected matters, decided by this Court on 15-12-2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretary, Board ofSecondary Education.Bhopai and the prospectus of Dipioma in Education Examination, it was clarified that the nomenclature of the Basic Training Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed and renamed as Diploma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Sopesft Kumar Verma vs. The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh andanothei) (Supra). Accordingly, the writ petition is aliowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipai Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired D.Ed. Examination Certificate on their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. B/- Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge