,s IN THE mGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATBILASPVR CHHATTISGABH' "° Cr.M.P. N0. - J-6 & OF 2009 (PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE) APPLICANT Sanjay Gupta S/o Bishambhar Dayal Gupta, aged ab.out 29 years, R/o - New Market, Dallirajhara, District- Durg (C.G.) Present R/o - Awanti vihar colony, Police y.'--''^ ^o^y-yi" Station - Telibandha, Raipur, District - ?-";'":'^.a-;^:""Raipur(c-G-) -n^-- ^^'"; .-A^ v^ VERSUS SL RESPONDENTj: _A^v.>' State of Chhattissarh through District ^- s"^ ,A^ J^* ;^ .\ i«?? t ^y^°^ ^^^'': ^ Aaju Pandey S/0. S&Ti,'PikaR Psasad Pandey, aged ateeyt 29 .^L, and Poit.'eT'Indsutri.^ Limited, SUtara, Baipur .S/8, Q.N. 84B ^iWpua'i* Raipurt Ois'triei —Baipux- (C*G«) ®y^s;i' ^^-u-e'_i^[cusL^unX_&£U.13UT__, ^^7^SsMSsm^K:s!/:R£s^^v:3^s5:!:-^3:.fssy^sf. ,5;' ;^ .^^""^i. Sg.WilU;.-' sgS^ ^f^':' ^^^f^: HI6H COURT OF CHHATrasgARH AT Singte Bench ; Hon'ble Wr. Justice Prit'nkei" Diwcker No. 168 of >i ~.l n OT Bisnamsnai &ayai ©upta State of ChhattisQarh A wiol'her Shri Shivendu Pandya, csunse! for the appi'cant- Shri Ravindra Aarawai. PL for the State/resDondenT hri A.C. Sahu. counse! for resnondent No. 2. No.l. PET3TION UN&ER SECTIOM4820F THg OF Cl o Present oetition fiied under Section 482 of ths Code of Criminal Procedure is directed caain.st the impugned ordsr dated 8.12.2008 passed by learned Ssssions Judge, Raipu" iri Criminai Revision No. 231/2008 whereby ieamed Sevisjond Court has affirmed the order dated 22.10.2008 psssed by Additiona! Chief Judidal Magistrste, Raipur by which the learned MGgistrate hes rejected the appl'CGtion as fHed by the appUccmt unde-r Section 457 of the Code of Crimina! Pr-ocedure fo" releasing the seized amount of Rs.4,00,000/- on supurdqinoma. Counsel for- the appiicant submits thst the cash airsount sei2ed from the appiicarit is the appticant's own money and the app!icant requires th.e same. for his business purpose. He submits that if this amosjnt is not given to the appiicant, he wlll suffer an irreparable ioss. He submits that the oppiicant is QJSO one of the o.ccused and, thsrefore, question of hjs absconding Q' ^--»^^ "'-A'"^ ^„.^" .;; -pt-"^"' ^:''' 2 SWSS^I does not ar'ise and even he is wiliing to give bank guarontee of this amouRt of Rs. 4.00.000/-. 3 . Counse! for the state or;d counse! for the complainant have no objection if the amount is given to the appiicarst on supurdginama. Stats counse!, however, submits that th® amount be released onty after the appiicant furnishes bank auar'antee. 4. I haye heard counsei for the parties and perused the materia! Gvaiiable OB record. 5. Without further enterlno into merits of ths case, ~.he petition is oiiowed. Amount of Rs.4,00,000/- which has been seized from the o.pplicant be given to him on supur'dignoma on his furnishinci bank Quarantee of Rs.4.00.000/- to the satisfo.ction of thetria! Court, Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge