@ HEGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRIMINAL MXSCELLANEOUS PETITION Kc. 415 OF 2009 Ashish Solanki, Sio Late Chiman Bhai Selanki, Aged about 43 years, R/o Pachhu' Para, Durg, RS. City KotwaH, Durg, Distt._ Durg (CG). PETETIO¥ER VERSUS v t RESPONDENTS 1. Murli Manohar Khandeiwal, Sjo ‘i Manakchand Khandelwal, Aged about 67 ycaxs, R/o A/ 22 Khandelwal Colony, Durg, RS. Durg City Kotwali, Durg (CG). 2. Stata of Chhattisgarh, Through District Magistrate Distn'ct Durg (C.G.). CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. (SB :Hon’ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) V Present. Smt. Fouzia Mirza, Advocate for thépetitioner. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Agrawal, P.L. for the State/respondent No. 2. ORAL- ORDER r (Passed on 12/ 8/ 2009 1. This petition is under Section 482 of the Code of Cn'minal Procedure, 1978 (in shoxt the code) agaiost the order dated 2 1 / 7/ 2009 passed by the lemed Sessions Judge, Durg in unregistered criminal revision Vide order dated 8/ 7f 09 affirming the order dated 8/ 7/ O9 passed by the leained Judicial Magistrate First Class, Durg in criminal Complaint No. 909/08 where by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Durg has rejected the application for examination of the documents by expert filed on behalf of the petitioner] accused. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at thestage of prosecution evidence her application has been rejected and she is Willing to tile suitable application for examination of the documents b ) y expert at thc‘stage defence but the present order would come into way at that time therefore she has flled this petition. drdef impugned and copy of the order of the trial Court peruseci. Admittedly, court below has rejected the applicatioh for examination of the documents by the expert at the stage of prosecution evidence but defencehas tight to adduce the evidence of expert relating to document filed on behalf of the prosecution which may effect the Iight the liability of the accused] petitioner, therefore the present petition is ‘ stands":’disposed of with a direciion that if petitioner files an application for examination of document by expert at defence stage then same be considered and opportunity be prov petitioner for such examination by expert. ~ ta’x ided to the Sd/— tiakwgwaam w