pvr 1 ca355-lpa281 IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.355 OF 2010 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.281 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6077 OF 2010 Mr.Noushad Valappad. ...Applicant/Appellant vs. Mrs.Sunayna Tarakad @ Sunayna Noushad Valappad. ...Respondent --- Mr.Mohan Pillai i/b. Madhavi Pillai, for Applicant. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & R.Y.GANOO,JJ. DATED: 9th December, 2010 P.C.: 1. This civil application is taken out by the applicant for restoration of Letters Patent Appeal no.281 of 2010. In that Letters Patent pvr 2 ca355-lpa281 Appeal, an order passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition no.6077 of 2010 is challenged. That Writ Petition no.6077 of 2010 was filed by the Appellant himself. Perusal of that petition shows that the petition was filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India which has been dismissed by the learned Single Judge. Therefore, in view of the law settled by the Supreme Court, a Letters Patent Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent does not lie against the order passed in writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, no useful purpose will be served by restoring the Letters Patent Appeal. Civil application is disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J.) (R.Y.GANOO,J.)