IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.14617 of 2011 Date of Decision : August 11, 2011. Updesh Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Sunil Agnihotri, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, there is no need to seek any counter-reply from the respondents at this stage. The petitioner who is working as Group Instructor in the Industrial Training Institute, Tanda and is due for retirement w.e.f. 31.10.2011 on attaining the age of superanuation, has been transferred to the Industrial Training Institute, Hoshiarpur vide the impugned order dated CWP No.14617 of 2011 [2] 26.7.2011 (Annexure P-3). In my considered view, there cannot be any administrative or public interest in uprooting the petitioner for a period of two months only. The writ petition is accordingly allowed; the impugned order dated 26.7.2011 (Annexure P-3) qua the petitioner is set-aside and the respondents are directed to allow him to work at Industrial Training Institute, Tanda. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. August 11, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE