1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 5349 of 2006 (Namdeo Sadashiv Parshuramkar and others -: versus :- State of Maharashtra and others) WRIT PETITION No. 3904 of 2007 (State of Maharashtra and others -: versus :- Namdeo Sadashiv Parshuramkar and others) WRIT PETITION No. 3942 of 2008 (Sunil Isan Deshmukh and others -: versus :- State of Maharashtra and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : MARCH 18, 2010. Heard learned Advocate Mr. M.P.Jaiswal for the complainants and learned Advocate Mr. S.G.Jagtap, for the employer in all the petitions. Mr.T.R.Kankale, learned A.G.P. for the State. The learned counsel jointly state that in view of judgment delivered today in Writ Petition No. 5350/2006 with connected matters, the controversy in present petitions is also taken care of and these writ petitions should be disposed of in terms of said judgment. In view of the statement made, the present writ petitions are also disposed of in terms of the judgment delivered in W.P. No.5350/2006 with connected matters. 2 Learned Industrial Court is directed to frame two additional issues as mentioned in said judgment, in addition to the five issues framed by it in ULP Complaint No.39 of 2005. Rule in terms of that judgment made absolute. No order as to costs. JUDGE Diwale