IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM MONDAY, THE 11TH APRIL 2011 / 21ST CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 11881 of 2011(I) ------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. SMT. ROSAMMA TONY, W/O. T.A. TONY, THADIKKARAN HOUSE, EDATHIRUTHY.P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT – 680 703. 2. T.A. TONY, THADIKKARAN HOUSE, EDATHURUTHY POST, THRISSUR – 680 684. BY ADVS. SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN, SMT.C.K.SHERIN, SRI.V.P.NARAYANAN. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER UNDER SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002, UNION BANK OF INDIA, POTHANIKKAD BRANCH, MOOVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT – 686 671. 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, UNION BANK OF INDIA, POTHANIKKAD BRANCH, MOOVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT – 686 671. R1 & R2 BY SRI. A.S.P. KURUP, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/04/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. C.K.ABDUL REHIM,J. ------------------------------- WP(C).NO. 11881 of 2011 --------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of April, 2011 JUDGMENT Challenge is against Ext.P2, which is only a notice issued under section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI Act). In view of the effective remedy available as provided under section 13(3A), it is not justified on the part of this court to entertain this writ petition, and the challenge is highly premature . 2. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner wants to seek any remedy regarding regularisation, they will be at liberty to approach the respondents. The writ petition is disposed of with the above observations, reserving liberty of the petitioner as mentioned above. C.K.ABDUL REHIM,JUDGE pmn/ WP(C) .10133/2011 2