1 WP 8828.2011 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8828 OF 2011 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders .......................... CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 23/11/2011. Mr. V.V.Bhavthankar, Advocate for the Petitioner. ......................... PER COURT : 1. Heard Mr. V.V. Bhavthankar, the learned counsel for the Petitioner. The learned counsel submits that the Issues are to be framed as per the pleadings of the parties. In the Written Statement, the petitioner had raised the issue relating to the challenge to the scheme of acquisition itself. But, the District Court has not considered this aspect and has erroneously rejected the application for framing of additional issue. According to the learned counsel, the said issue proposed was relevant and necessary for effective adjudication of the dispute. 2. With the assistance of the learned counsel, I have gone through the order. 2 WP 8828.2011 3. The proceedings before the District Court are the proceedings U/s 30 of the Land Acquisition Act [ For short, ‘ L.A. Act ’ ]. The proceedings U/s 30 of the L.A. Act are only meant for deciding the dispute regarding the apportionment of the compensation amount. The said Reference does not contemplate any decision or challenge to the acquisition proceedings itself. 4. In light of the above, no error is committed by the trial Court in rejecting the application. 5. The Writ Petition as such is dismissed. No costs. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J. ] KNP/WP 8828.2011