IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 18TH JANUARY 2011 / 28TH POUSHA 1932 RCRev..No. 30 of 2011 -------------------------- RCA.3/2009 of RENT CONTROL APPELLATE AUTHORITY/DISTRICT COURT, KASARAGOD RCP.11/2007 of PRL.MUNSIFF, KASARAGOD .................... REVISION PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. SHARATH KUMARI, W/O.VISHWANATHA, RESIDING AT HOSAMANE OF BANGRAMANJESHWAR VILLAGE, KASARAGOD TALUK, P.O.MANJESHWAR. 2. B.M.DAYANANDA, S/O.GOVINDA MASTER, RESISING AT KATTE HOUSE, BANGRAMANJESHWAR VILLAGE, KASARAGOD TALUK, P.O.MANJESHWAR. BY ADV. SRI.K.G.GOURI SANKAR RAI RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS ----------------------------------------------------- 1. P.M.ABDUL HAMEED, S/O.MAMMADE BEARY MELANGADI IN BANGRAMANJESHWAR VILLAGE, KASARAGOD TALUK, P.O. MANJESHWAR – 671121. 2. ZAINABA, W/O.ABDUL HAMEED MELANGADI IN BANGRAMANJESHWAR VILLAGE, KASARAGOD TALUK, P.O. MANJESHWAR – 671121. THIS RENT CONTROL REVISION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JJ. ------------------------ R.C.R.No. 30 OF 2011 ------------------------ Dated this the 18th day of January, 2011 O R D E R Pius C.Kuriakose, J. Even though apparently attractive grounds are raised in this memorandum of revision, it was very fairly submitted before us by Sri.K.G.Gowri Shankar Rai learned counsel for the revision petitioners that the execution court has already ordered and effected delivery of the building in question even before the petitioners could move this court in revision. Under the above circumstances, we are obliged to decline jurisdiction and dismiss the revision petition as infructuous. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE dpk