IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST MARCH 2007 / 30TH PHALGUNA 1928 WP(C).No. 9739 of 2007(H) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ A.M.ASHRAF, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.A.MEERANNAN, MUBARAK MANZIL, VANDIPERIYAR P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.S.MANU SRI.ANOOP.V.NAIR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, IDUKKI. 2. SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, IDUKKI. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.N.SUDHADEVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/03 /2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, J. ----------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.9739 OF 2007-H ----------------------------------------- JUDGMENT The petitioner challenges Ext.P5 notice issued to hold a timing conference, to look into the objections received against Ext.P4 time schedule granted to his stage carriage on the route Koottar – Ernakulam South. Ext.P5 is only a notice. The petitioner can bring to the notice of the Secretary, R.T.A., his objections to the course of action adopted by the Secretary. Normally, the Secretary, R.T.A cannot revise the time schedule either suo motu or on application, immediately after the finalisation of it, unless there are special circumstances. The petitioner may bring to the notice of the Secretary that no such circumstances exist in this case and request him to drop further proceedings in the matter. In view of the said remedy available to the petitioner, this Writ Petition is not entertained. Accordingly, it is closed without prejudice to the contentions of the petitioner. 21st March, 2007. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. Nm/