THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.20616 OF 2009 Dated 22nd April, 2010 Between: N.Krupakar Reddy …Petitioner And The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Hyderabad and 2 others. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : None appeared Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Prohibition & Excise The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside proceedings, dated 07-03-2009, issued by respondent No.2, whereby the petitioner was directed to pay the additional enclosure fee. At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. However, it is admitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise representing the respondents that the issue raised in this Writ Petition is squarely covered by order, dated 26-06-2009, in W.P.No.12608 of 2009. The operative portion of the order in the said Writ Petition reads as under: “The Writ Petition is therefore allowed without going into the merits of the sustainability of levy. Respondent No.3 is given liberty to initiate fresh action and pass an appropriate order after calling for explanation from the petitioner against the proposed levy.” This Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the above-mentioned order. The reasons and directions contained in the said order shall form part of this order. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP No.26875 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 22nd April, 2010 lur