Civil Revision No. 5805 of 2005 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 5805 of 2005 Date of Decision: 25.11.2008 Mohinder Kaur (dead) represented through her legal representatives and Others …Petitioners Versus Krishan Lal and Another ... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Vijay Lath, Advocate for the petitioners. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that eviction petition was filed before 1997. He has drawn my attention to head note of the judgment of learned Rent Controller, Ropar, wherein it is mentioned that this case pertains to Remand Case Rent Application No. 6 of 15.3.1997. Learned counsel further contends that within 11 years, ground realities have changed and subsequent events are such that now if it is pleaded that personal necessity of the landlord is made out, he will be able to prove the same. He has further stated that he may be permitted not to press the present revision petition and liberty be granted to file a Civil Revision No. 5805 of 2005 2 fresh eviction petition taking a ground that personal necessity of landlord is made out in the changed circumstances. Learned counsel further states that the finding of rejection of personal necessity may not stand in his way and he may be permitted to set up his case afresh. As prayed, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge November 25, 2008 “DK”