IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5684 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:28.09.2011 M/s Jai Mata Sanitary & Hardware Store & Others ....Petitioners Versus Mamta Gupta and others ....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. K.S. Boparai, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Piyush Bansal, Advocate for the respondents. * * * RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL) This is tenants' revision petition challenging the impugned order dated 16.08.2011 whereby the request of the petitioners for deferring the further cross-examination of witness was rejected and consequently the cross-examination of the petitioner was treated to be nil. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view that the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure are handmaid for administration of justice, one opportunity is granted to the petitioners to complete remaining part of the cross-examination of Mamta Gupta- respondent on the date fixed before the Trial Court. Copy dasti on payment. . September 28, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) savita JUDGE