IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12885 of 2009 PRATIMA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 8.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the termination of her service from the post of Anganbari Sevika by an order dated 25.8.2009 issued by the District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua. The submission is that the order has been passed in violation of the principles of natural justice. Learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly acknowledges from Annexures 2 and 4 to the writ application that show cause notices were issued to her by the CDPO to which she replied whereafter orders have been passed by the District Magistrate. Her grievance however is that the cause shown has not been properly considered. The guidelines laid down by the State Government for appointment and service conditions of an Anganbari Sevika in the year 2006 as modified in the year 2008 vests power in the Divisional Commissioner to hear appeal against the order of the District Magistrate. Once the petitioner acknowledges that show cause notices were issued to her, her remedy properly lies in an appeal before the Divisional Commissioner only. 2 In that view of the matter, leave is sought to withdraw the application to prefer an appeal before the Divisional Commissioner. If the petitioner prefers an appeal within a period of one month from today, the same shall be decided and disposed off in accordance with law without going into the question of limitation. The writ petition stands disposed off. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)