IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.6641 of 1999 Between: APSRTC Represented by its Managing Director, Mushirabad, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Rep. by its Presiding Officer Hyderabad. 2 The Regional Transport Authority , Rep. by its Secretary Cuddapah. 3 T.Siva Reddy R/o L.R.Pally, Cuddapah District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction especially in the nature of a writ of certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impunged order dt. 17/09/98 made in AP.No.97/97 on the file of the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, A.P., Hyderabad, setting aside the order dt. 24/12/1996 made in R.No.6579/A2/93 by the Regional Transport Authority, Cuddapah and quash the same as arbitrary and illegal, without jurisdication and pass such other order or orders, as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT.W.V.S.RAJESWARI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following: Form-NIC-OGS/WP{JPK} THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.6641 of 1999 O R D E R: When the matter taken up for hearing on 26.03.2008, none appeared for the petitioner, and the matter is directed to be listed on 09.04.2008 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. On 09.04.2008 a representation has been made on behalf of the learned Standing Counsel for the petitioner that the present writ petition is a route matter and is a non-service matter. Basing on that representation, it is ordered to delete the matter under caption ‘for dismissal’ and post before the regular Court. Accordingly, the matter came up for hearing before this Court on 22.04.2008, but none appears for the petitioner on that day and hence adjourned to today. Today also when the matter is called, none appears for the petitioner. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. ___________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 29.04.2008 Dsr ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Rep. by its Presiding Officer Hyderabad. 2 The Regional Transport Authority , Rep. by its Secretary Cuddapah. 3.2CCs to 4.2CD copies