1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.491 OF 2009 (Navsin Anjum Asad Khan and others vs. Akola Municipal Corporation and another) ___________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 25, 2009 Heard Shri Palshikar, learned Counsel for the petitioners, and Shri Anjan De, learned Counsel for the respondent no.1. Shri Palshikar, learned Counsel for the petitioners, states that petitioners participated in the interview process undertaken by the respondent no.1 to fill up the posts of Shikshan Sevak from Urdu medium category. It is submitted that names of the petitioners were reflected in the select list. However, since orders of appointment were not issued by the respondent no.1, the petitioners have filed the present petition. Shri Anjan De, learned Counsel for the respondent no.1, states that in view of complaints 2 regarding recruitment process, investigation is going on, which is likely to conclude within a period of two weeks from today. It is submitted that on completion of investigation, appropriate steps in accordance with law would be taken in the matter. In the backdrop of the above referred facts, no further action in the petition is necessary. The petition is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE khj