ste •!?*., FE?jfr"1^ ^"Si^^'l1^ •N,^"^3.^?"^ ;K!^ ? 'Kt:';' S~ i* 3 ?-».i; ''«' ''i>'? ': ' C^^yo^-- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Sl No.^^3 /2006 PETITIONER ,l» .•••'^•>' ^Chitrabhan Dubey S/o Shri ^D;.-^< ^^°- y!^^ <?y^: ^^ ^ RESPONDENTS /• ^ .;o?r •'~^-^'*^ 13 .^^^(u .^ ..I ^'yy ^- ^ Dhanurjay Dubey Aged about 46 years, Asst. Teacher Govt. Middle School, Nawapara (Mond), Block - Pushore, Distt. - Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) /2. District Education Officer;'Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) /3. Block Education Officer, Block - Pushore, Distt. Raigarh ^^ WRIT PETITION U/A 226/a^-OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WMTS AND DIRECTIONS iGLE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATJSH K. AGNiHOTRI, J. Bstitiener ResBondents ITION (S.) N0.< Chitrabhan Dubey versus State of Chhattisgarh and others Present : Mr. Sanjay Patei, counse! rorthe petltioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ith (Passed on 14"' Day of December, 2008) Lsarned counssi appearing for the petitioner as also for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of iaw invoived in the present 'writ petition are squareSy coversd by the dscision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kismar Bhsradwaj vs. 2. !n subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (S.) No.5862 of 2005 (Hamant Kumar Vishwakarma vs. Sfefe of Chhattisgarh and others) and other connected matter, decided by this Court on 12-12- 2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, 'issued by the Secretar^', soard of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Dipioma in Education Examination, it was cianfied that the nomsnclature of the Basic Training Institute, i.s., B.T.!. has bsen changsd and renamed as Dipioma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by ths decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.5862 of 2006 (Hemant Kumar Wshwakarma vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others) (Supra). 3. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ pstltson is disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matte' of Yashwant Kumar Bharad'if/aj (Supra), subject to vsrification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired D.Ed. Certificate at his cwn expenses as per the circuiars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and Turther whether he has been paid t.¥oadvance Increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 200S (il) MPJR-CG 96 Gopa^