S.B.Civil Contempt Petition No.268/2006 (Dauda vs. Shrimant Pandey & Ors.) Date of order : March 29, 2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.A.K.Acharya, for the petitioner. Mr.Ravi Bhansali, for the respondents. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Respondents have filed a detailed reply. Along with the reply, the respondents have annexed a document Annexure- R/2/2 showing the details of payment made to the present petitioner by various cheques, demand drafts as also the bankers cheque. Learned counsel for the respondents has shown me a letter issued by the State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur, Pali confirming the payment drawn by the petitioner by bankers cheque. In this view of the matter, there had been substantial compliance of the order of this Court and, therefore, it cannot be said that there is any deliberate or willful disobedience of the order of this Court. The contempt petition stands disposed of. Notices are discharged. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-