1 ca3847/10 dmt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3847 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 50 OF 2008 Pushpa Bhashkar Khadkar & Anr. .. Applicants Vs. Vinayak B. Patil & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr. Nitesh S. Nershe for applicant. Mr. Akhilesh S. Dubey i/by M/s. Tripathi for respondent nos. 1A to 1M, 2A to 2J, 3A to 3C, 4A, 4B, 5A to 5G, 6A to 6K & 7A to 7I. Mr. J.S. Chandnani for Respondent Nos. 8 to 11. Mr. Suhas Deokar i/by C.G. Gavnekar for respondent Nos. 12 to 17. Mr. Vaibhav Gaikwad i/by Mr. A.M. Kulkarni for respondent nos. 18 & 19. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U. D. SALVI, JJ. NOVEMBER 23, 2010. P.C. Heard. 2. The applicants pray for being added as interveners in First Appeal No. 50 of 2008. 3. However, it is noticed that First Appeal No. 50 of 2008 has already been disposed off in terms of the consent terms filed between the parties to the appeal. If the applicants claim their share from the father in 2 ca3847/10 law i.e. appellant no. 3 in the first appeal, they may have their appropriate remedy before the Civil Court to claim their share in the proceeds received under the consent terms. Hence, the application is rejected with liberty to the applicants to take out appropriate proceedings. (U.D. SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)