1 Cri.Appln.2816 of 2010 hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2816 OF 2010 Uddhavkrishna Sharma and Ors. ... Applicants Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Niranjan Mogre i/by Mr. S.M. Gorwadkar, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. S.A. Shaikh, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL,J. DATED : AUGUST 25, 2011 P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the applicants. During the course of submission, he informs that the matter was settled and memorandum of understanding was entered into dated 17.8.2009 between respondent no. 2 Smt. Hemlata and her husband/in- laws. Inspite of service, respondent no. 2 is absent. The learned counsel submits that respondent has received consideration of Rs. 5 lacs as was 2 Cri.Appln.2816 of 2010 agreed in the memorandum under clause (1) vide two pay orders as referred therein. Taking these aspects into consideration and reading of the FIR as a whole, I find that it is a figment of imagination and un- worth events are projected against the applicants. Consequently proceedings are quashed. Application is allowed. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)