IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10588 of 2009 SAHABUDDIN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 9.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Petitioner is part of the mob which has supposed to have assaulted the informant for which the case in question, namely, Abadpur P.S. Case No. 26 of 2005 came to be instituted under several sections including section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. Contention of the petitioner is that the main accused has already been enlarged on bail much earlier and he has been in custody now from January, 2009 The Court however noticed the fact that the case in question relates to the year, 2005 and the petitioner surrendered only in the year, 2009. In otherwords he has been absconding from the rigors of law and that should be good enough to deny him the privilege of bail. On a categorical statement made at the bar on behalf of the petitioner that he is willing to cooperate with the trial on each and every date fixed in the case before the trial court and shall not abscond, the petitioner, namely, Sahabuddin be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with Abadpur - 2 - P.S. Case No. 26 of 2005. One of the sureties will be executed by Shamshul Haque, so called maternal uncle of the petitioner who has sworn the affidavit on behalf of the petitioner on due identification by the court below. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)