1 1. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8284/2009 Nathulal Maida & Ors. Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. 2. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8562/2009 Ashok Kumar Chouhan. Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. 3. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8561/2009 Ajeet Kumar Mourya. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 4. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8884/2009 MS Godara & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 5. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8858/2009 Nathu Ram & Anr. Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. 6. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8928/2009 Narendra Singh. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 7. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8929/2009 Sakir Ali. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 8. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8930/2009 Suresh Katariya. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 9. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8940/2009 Suresh Kumar Mishra. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 10. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8941/2009 Babu Singh Rawat. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 11. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8942/2009 Ratna Ram Jyani. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 12 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8943/2009 Suresh Kumar. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 13. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8919/2009 Mukesh Kumar. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 14.9.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA. Ms.Aruna Negi, Mr.Mehmood Aslam, Mr.MS Godara, Mr.Amit Mehta, Mr.Kailash Trivedi, Mr.AK Choudhary, for the petitioners. Mr. RL Jangid, Addl. Advocate General, for the respondents. <><><> 2 Learned counsel for the petitioners are directed to supply two sets of copies the memo of writ petition to learned Addl. Advocate General Sh. RL Jangid, who is appearing in all the connected matters. The writ petitions have been heard and decided today itself because of the reason that several similar writ petitions have already been disposed of and one of which is SBCWP No.3835/2009 – Kanwar Lal & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., decided on 19th May, 2009. Accordingly, these writ petitions are also disposed of in terms of the judgment referred above with following order:- (1)The automatic termination orders of the petitioner/s are set aside. The respondents are directed to continue the petitioner/s in service till regularly selected candidates by regular mode of recruitment are made available. (2)The petitioner/s shall not be entitled for wages relating to the period of vacations; and (3)On availability of the selected candidates by regular mode of recruitment, may that be by direct 3 recruitment or by way of promotion, it shall be open for the respondents to terminate the Vidhyarthi Mitras by adhering the principles of “last come first go”, by determining their seniority at State level. (PRAKASH TATIA),J. S.Phophaliya/-