:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.61 OF 2005 Gurudevsingh Jagjitsingh Grover ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra & anr. ... Respondents ... Mr.H.K. Prem, for the Applicant. Mr.V.B. Konde Deshmukh, A.P.P., for the Respondents. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 19th January 2005 P.C.: 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. Perused the record. For the reasons already recorded by the Sessions Court, while rejecting the bail application preferred by the present Applicant, in my opinion, it is not necessary to depart from those reasons. The same are cogent and supported by the materials on record. If it is so, having regard to the seriousness of the offence, and :2: material to indicate complicity of the Applicant in the commission of the crime, not a case for bail. Rejected. 2. The trial Court is directed to expedite the hearing of the trial to be preferably concluded within 9 months from today. It is made clear that the trial Court shall record its opinion if it is of the view that the Applicant is responsible for prolonging the trial. That fact be recorded in the roznama, so that it can be taken into account as and when occasion arises. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)