IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc.No.M-6225 of 2010 Date of Decision:06.10.2010 Bhagwan Dass ...Petitioner Versus State of U.T. Chandigarh and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI Present:- Mr. Mahesh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.K. Khindria, Advocate, for respondent No. 1 M.M.S.Bedi, J. (Oral) Despite service, respondent No. 2 has not appeared. Counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the affidavit of complainant produced in this Court, the FIR may be quashed on the basis of compromise. In the facts and circumstances of the case, respondent No. 2 has not appeared in Court but confirmed that the matter has been compromised. In the interest of justice, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to frame the charges and record the statements of complainant/respondent No. 2 within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and dispose of the trial expeditiously preferably within three months. A copy of this order be communicated to the trial Court. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE 06.10.2010 G.Arora