THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI CONTEMPT CASE No. 798 OF 2010 Dated: 14.09.2010 Between: Polabathina Sowdamini ..... PETITIONER AND D.Jaya Sree .....RESPONDENT The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI CONTEMPT CASE No. 798 OF 2010 ORDER : This contempt case is filed alleging violation of the order dated 22.10.2009 in W.P.M.P.No.29350 of 2009 in W.P.No.22606 of 2009, whereunder the respondent herein was directed to receive the application of the petitioner and process the same. A counter affidavit has been filed stating that in compliance with the order of this Court, the respondent sent a call letter to the petitioner to appear for the interview scheduled on 25.01.2010 and accordingly, the petitioner had attended the interview. However, it appears that the Selection Committee has not taken any decision on appointment of Anganwadi worker of Vetapalem village. The fact that the petitioner was allowed to appear for the interview on 25.01.2010 has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. However, it is contended that the action of the Selection Committee, to which the respondent herein is also a member, in not finalising the selections amounts to deliberate violation of the order of this Court dated 22.10.2009 and therefore, the respondent is liable to be punished under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. I do not find any substance in the said contention. As noticed above, the order passed by this Court was only to receive and process the petitioner’s application. Admittedly that has been complied with. There was no direction by this Court to finalise the selection and therefore, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the Selection Committee in not finalising the selections, it is for him to seek appropriate direction in the writ petition, which is still pending. Hence, the Contempt Case is misconceived and accordingly, the same is dismissed. No costs. _____________ Date: 14.09.2010 G. ROHINI, J Ivd