C?’ [52/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 1 i WRIT PETITION (SI No [/33 3 /2009 : 1' ’ PETITIONER / Murari Lal Aditya, J S/o. Shri Pamtram Aditya, Aged about 49. years, Teacher, G vt. Middle School, Jora, Block— Bilaigarh, Balauda Bazaar, Raippr (C.) I VERSUS RESPNDENTs /1. State of Chhéttisgarh, Through the :Secretaly, ' School Education, D.K.S Bhawan Mantralaya Raipur (C G) /2.‘ Dlstrlct Educatlon ofdcer Balodabazaar, Dlstnct Ra1pur (C G ) 2;. . Block Educatlon O$ce13 Bilaigarh, Balodabazaar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 4. Chief Executive Odiccr Zila Panchayat, Raipur (C.G.) ii , I I ” WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE consTITUTION OF INDIA G. é § mammowaaw) m «rm m ‘ WM1§wm awamm rmKElz‘ DIWAKER B: HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE 17.8 2009 ‘ S1111 Chandresh Shnvasta a, counsel for the net1t1oner Ms SLmta Ja'n, P L for t e State Counsel for the petmonel wants to Withdraw the present petitioh‘ With‘liberty to file repre .entation before respondent No.1 against the orders dated Q672 . 6.8.2009 passed by responde the eventuality of filing any su passed by respondent No.2 and .4. He further submits that in representation the same may be x p directed to be decided expeditiou 1y. Contention of the couns l for the State is that let the petitioner make representation the same would be decided in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petition’is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. ‘ln the eventuality of filing any such representation by the petitioner 3efore the respondent No.1 Within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the same would be decided Within a further period of three weeks from the date of its receipt. k Sd/- Pntlnker Bxwaker Judge ' S P 0 nt 9 0 d 5