IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3155 of 2009 1. ANJAN @ ANJANI PATHAK S/O-Gopal Pathak 2.THEKAN SINGH @ FEKAN SINGH S/O-Late Bishundeo Singh 3.MUNNA MIAN S/O-Eslam Mian All are R/O-Vill-Khutaha Dih, P.S.-Barahiya, Distt.-Lakhisarai. …………………………………………..Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ……………………………………..Opposite Party. ----------- 3/ 16.04.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are accused of the case which was initially registered under Sections 386, 379, 323 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Later on, Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code has been added. In paragraph-11 of the petition it was specifically mentioned that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. When it was pointed out by the informant that the petitioners are already accused in some criminal cases from before then for verification the case diary has been called for. From the case diary, it appears that the - 2 - statement which was made on behalf of the petitioners was thoroughly incorrect. The petitioners do not deserve any sympathy at all. Considering this, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, their prayer for bail is rejected. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)