IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WP/3608/2011 JAYRAM DADARAO KALE V/S THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS. ... Smt. Bharati B.Gunjal, Advocate for petitioner Shri D.R.Korde, AGP for respondents. ... CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE & S.B.DESHMUKH, JJ. Dated : June 9, 2011 PER COURT :- 1. Leave to amend. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if the directions are issued to respondent No.3 to decide their representation dated 2.8.2010 (Exhibit "J" to the petition) within time frame and in that case she has instructions not to press other prayers in the Writ Petition. 4. Having regard to the nature of controversy involved in the Writ Petition and prayers made in the Writ Petition we are satisfied that this Writ Petition can be conveniently disposed of by following order : 5. Respondent No.3 shall consider and decide the petitioner's representation dated 2.8.2010 as expeditiously as possible and (2) WP/3608/2011 preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of this order, on merits and in accordance with law. The petitioner to communicate this order to the concerned respondent within a period of three weeks from today. 6. While passing this order, we shall not be understood have examined the merits of the case. (S.B.DESHMUKH, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) akl