1 20 S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO.5498/2009 Bhanwar Lal Vs. The State of Rajasthan DATE OF ORDER : 15th December 2009 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr.Shambhoo Singh,for the petitioner. Mr.Anil Joshi,Public Prosecutor for State. .... BY THE COURT It was noticed in this case on 10th inst., that the Investigating Officer had omitted to cite the prosecutrix even as a witness in the charge-sheet; and that the learned Trial Court, though directed the name of the prosecutrix to be added in the list of witnesses but did not summon her. While observing that there was no reason as to why the prosecutrix, when ordered to be joined in the list of witnesses, was not ordered to be summoned by the Trial Court, this Court directed the Trial Court to take necessary steps immediately. It has been informed that the prosecutrix was indeed produced before the Trial Court on 11.12.2009 and her statement has been recorded. A copy of such statement has been placed for perusal by the learned Public Prosecutor and it has also been pointed out that the requisite proceedings have been adopted against the erring officer. It is expected of 2 the authorities concerned to take necessary steps/ proceedings in accordance with law against the erring officer. So far the plea for bail is concerned, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that having regard to the overall circumstances, the petitioner shall stand advised not to press on this bail application at this stage; and with such submissions, does not press on this bail application at this stage. Accordingly, the bail application moved on behalf of the petitioner Bhanwal Lal s/o Rupa Ji under Section 439 Cr.P.C. stands dismissed as not pressed at this stage. (DINESH MAHESHWARI),J. s.soni