1304wp5466.08.sxw FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 5466 OF 2008 Smt. Shobhatai Burde Vs. Mamta Sanjay Akare & others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's Orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. I. N. Choudhari, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr. R. A. Gupte, Adv. for respondent No. 7. Mrs. R. A. Wasnik, AGP for respondent No. 8. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. DATE : 13th April, 2009. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, respondent No. 7 and learned A.G.P. for respondent No. 8. None for respondents No. 1 to 6, though served. Perused the impugned order passed by the learned Assistant charity Commissioner. Taking overall view of the matter, I see no reason to interfere with order dated 30/9/2008, passed by the learned Assistant Charity Commissioner. A grievance of the petitioner is that the observations made by the learned Assistant Charity Commissioner are not based on the record. Though facts were specifically submitted by the petitioner in the application and brought to the notice of the learned Assistant Charity Commissioner, the Assistant Charity Commissioner has erroneously observed overlooking the facts. For this purpose, the petitioner can approach the learner Assistant Charity Commissioner by taking appropriate steps as provided under the law. I make it clear that the petitioner can move the learned Assistant Charity Commissioner for that specific purpose only. With these observations, the petition is disposed of as dismissed. JUDGE wwl