XI—HC—78 3am,mng,W mm ' .Q?f(§j;;.(4§§$ a1 V 200g; WW(W) mmm WWW mawm WW§WW ‘ $Wm ' 30-8-2006 Mr. Vishnu Koshta, counse Mr. Satish Gupta, Deputy on advance copy. Heard both the counseL' By the instant writ petitio India, the petitioner has challe (Annexure P-2) passed by re transferred from Primary'Schooi, Koytibeda. Vii The said transfer has bei‘ ' Clause 7 of the~rationalization aggrieved person. Learned counsei for the aiready preferred an appeal befc appeai is not being decided by re be directed to decide the appeal State/respondents has no objectio . Having heard learned cour facts and circumstances of the c: the appeal of the petitioner within of this order, in accordance with Ia afd N. With the direction aforesaid Consequently, M.{W.)P.No. Soma Ifor the petitioner. Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents, n under Article 226 of the Constitution of nged his transfer order dated 29—7-2006 ispondent No.3, whereby he has been bhawandto Primary School. P.V.77, Block: n made under the rationalization scheme. scheme provides for an appeal by the petitioner submits that the petitioner has- re respondent No.2 on 4-8-2006 and that aspondent No.2, therefore, respondent No.2 to which learned counsel appearing for the ).. sel for the parties and having regard to the ase, respondent No.2 is directed to decide 3O days from the date of receipt of a copy t the petition stands disposed of, 3543/2006 also stands disposed of. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge W