c^F<( ^ j- ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G) W.P. fS) N0. ^^4S /2011 PETITIONER ^" -^.s1^.. .^'^^' ^ ''?^TL- '^'"" Munendra Kumar Sharma, aged about 49 years, S/o Late Shri Yadunandan Prasad Sharma, Upper Divjsion Teacher, working at Assistant Block education officer Patharia, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS VERSUS :1.^ State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 1. Director, Public Instructions, Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer, Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Block Patharia, Distt.Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITIONUNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA fiiaH COURT OF CHHATTISOARIi AT BII-A8PUR SB : HON»BI.BMR. JUSTXCB PKSTWKEB. ®rWAIC PBTITIONBR RBSPONDENTS W.P.fSI.NO, 3863/2011 Munendra Kumar Sharma versus Sta.tG of C.Q. 8s, Others Shri K.S*Rawar^ counsel for the petitioner. Shri Praveen Das, Dy. G. A. for the State. S?RIT PETITION UNDBRAR.TICI*®226 OFTHB CONSTXTUTZ^L0F INDIA ORDBR (20.07.2011) By this petitiony the petitioner has prayed for a djrection to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner and provide benefit of FR 22 (D) of the Chhattisgai'h Fandamenta! Rules^ for grant of increments as provided under the rules and also to pay arrears from the date when it became due. At the very outset, counsel appearing for the petitioner submite that the identical matter has already been considered and decided by thia Court vide order dated 27.3.2008 in W.P.(S) No. 4991/2006 and the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the said decision< Counse! appeanng for the State does not dispute that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No. 4991/2006. He further submits that if the petitioner files fresh representation before the concemed authorities for the reliefs^ which he has claimed by way of this petition^ the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, subject to verification of facts. Por the foregoing reasons^ the instant petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh representation before the respondent authorities raising all his grievances raised in this petition and on such representation being made, the respondent authorities shall consider and decide the same in aceordance with law on its own merite, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation. ^- - Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge