((-1-)) HVN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION F.E.R.A. NO. 37 OF 2006 Director of Enforcement ... Appellant Versus M/s. Mackinnom Mackenzie & Co. Pvt. Ltd. ... Respondents ALONGWITH F.E.R.A. NO. 38 OF 2006 Director of Enforcement ... Appellant Versus M/s. Mackinnom Mackenzie & Co. Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondents Mr. R.V. Desai with Mrs. Shehnaz V. Bharucha and Mr. A.S. Rao i/by Mr. T.C. Kaushik for Appellant. Mr. P.D. Ghandy with Ms. Sumedha Vedpathak i/by Maneksha and Sethna for Respondents. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED: AUGUST 10, 2007 DATED: AUGUST 10, 2007 DATED: AUGUST 10, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . These two appeals corresponding to appeals Nos. 219/99 and 220/99 before the Appellate Authority. The respondents were charged for contravention of the provisions of section 16(1)(a) and 16(1)(b) of the FERA Act. The learned tribunal on considering the evidence found from the evidence led by the prosecution it was not of the degree of proof as required and unable to connect the respondents ((-2-)) herein with the alleged violation and consequently allowed the appeals. . We have perused the said findings. We do not find the same to be perverse. At any rate nothing has been brought to our attention warranting interference by this court. In the light of that, there is no error of law. All appeals with corresponding civil applications stands dismissed. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)