IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.7189/2010 Nepal Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order : 6.8.2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr. Rajat Ranjan for the accused petitioner Mr. Amit Poonia, Public Prosecutor for the State ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for the accused petitioner is that the offence of abduction has been falsely foisted upon the petitioner. In fact the petitioner is real uncle of child Raju and that his mother Anar Kali in her statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C. has admitted the fact that she3 allowed the petitioner to take Raju with him. Offence of abduction has been registered against the petitioner at the instance of Rajendra, second husband of Anar Kali who married to him after she visited the house of Vinod, brother of the petitioner. Petitioner was arrested on 10.5.2010 and since then he is behind the bars. No criminal case was ever registered against him. Trial of the case is likely to take considerable time. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Considering the rival submissions and without expressing any opinion on the merits of this case but taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail during trial. Resultantly, the bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Nepal Singh S/O Shri Jai Ram Singh shall be released on bail in F.I.R. No. 150/2010 of P.S. Muhana, district Jaipur on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till conclusion of the trial. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. Thanvi