HIGH COURT OF CI‘IHA’I’I‘ISGARH BILASPUR PETITIONER é€9 r Mukund Shawn Singh, S/o Vishveshwar Singh, Aged about 7O years, R/o Village Nariyara, District Janjgir—Chapa (C.G.). RESPOIIBENT$ 3. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. Vs. Stats of Chhattisgaxh: Through Secrétary Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Rajpur. Sub Divisional omcer Cum Land Acquisition Officer, District Janjgir—Chapa (C.G.) Vardha Power Plant: Through Managing Director, Nariyapara, Districtr Janjgir Chapa (£16.) WWWW WRIT PETITION (Cl NO.’ OF 201 1 WWW Wamiiww $Wm S.B: HON’BLE SHRI MANINDRA MOHA‘N SHRIVASTAVA, J. 04.02.201 1 Shri R.K‘KeshanNani, counse! fort Shri V.V.S.Mutthy, Deputy Advoca he petitioner. te General with Shri Suryakant Mishra, P.L. for the respondents No. 1 & 2/State. The petitioner has approached Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia ve that a part of the Iand belonging to the pe itioner was acquired in land acquisition proceedings Jar establishment of po er plant of respondent No.3 and respondent No.3 has now started encroa hing upon other ,lands of the petitioner which have not been acquired by the Stat and its authorities. On bare perusal of facts which ha e been pleaded in the petition and the that there is any allegation that the is not the subject matter of land acquisition, have been ordered to be han ed over by any of the State Authorities to be a private dispute. The remedy documents annexed therein, I do .not fin lands belonging to the petitioner, whi to respondent No.3. it, therefore, appea of the petitioner, therefore, lies elsewhere Under these circumstances, l a jurisdiction to come to the aid of the company. However, it, would be open for the petitioner to take appropriate remedy before the Civil Court to protect hi right and property. In view of the above, the petition i dismissed with the tiberty as above. Sd/— New < "-' no". rt = L‘w'f ' ‘-:urt to broteCt his " .his Court invoking jurisdiction under ilating his grievance on the pleadings not inclined to invoke extraordinary titfoner against the private person / Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge t