1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Chamber Summons No. 683 of 2004 in Suit NO. 1144 of 2000 UNION OF INDIA ... Plaintiff V/S S.J.THANAWALA AND ORS. .... defendants Mr. S.R.Rajguru i/b. Dr.T.C. Kaushik for Plaintiff Mr. M. S. Rane i/b. Purnanand & Co., for defendant no.1&2. Mr. R.P. Gurjar i/b. V. Murthy for Respondent nos. 1 to 9. CORAM: ROSHAN DALVI J. Date: 19/12 / 2005 P.C. The Plaintiffs desire to add certain further defendants to the suit. The only amendment required is to join those parties as party defendants in the suit. The Plaintiff's advocate clarifies that those are the parties required to be impleaded as defendants. The Plaintiffs are allowed to carry out the amendment to the plaint by adding them as further parties to the suit. It is contended by the Plaintiff that the names of all the defendants as well as the parties who are 2 sought to be impleaded were mentioned in the conveyance. Some of the parties have remained to be impleaded and that is why the Plaintiffs seeks to implead them. The Plaintiffs also seek to implead the Municipal Corporation because of the award of the Land Acquisition Officer in respect of the suit premises. The Plaintiffs are entitled to amend the plaint by adding these parties as defendants. Chamber Summons allowed accordingly. The Plaintiffs shall carry out amendments within 2 weeks. The Plaintiffs shall also carry out amendments in the copy of the plaint served upon the defendant within 2 weeks. The Plaintiffs shall serve the writ of summons upon the newly added defendants, consequent upon the amendment. Chamber Summons disposed of. No order as to costs. ( ROSHAN DALVI J.)