IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 284 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 111 OF 2003 DAVID A. DSOUZA ... Applicant Versus SALGAONKAR MINING INDUSTRIES PVT LTD MARGAO ... Respondent Petitioner in Person. Mr. S.S. Kantak, Advocate General with Mr. A. Kamat, Addl. Goverment Advocate for the Respondent. Coram:- SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 16th December, 2009 P.C. This is an application for intervention filed by the intervenor in person. The application is being opposed by the Government as well as by Advocate Mr. Sonak. When asked to engage the services of a lawyer, the intervenor submits that he does not require one. According to him the vessel cannot belong to the Government. There is already a prima facie finding to that effect, of which the intervenor is not aware. Application therefore, is rejected. SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. MF/-