IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWPs No. 8076, 8079, 8080, 8081, 8082, 8084, 8085, 8181, 8182 & 8183 of 2011. Decided on: 28th September, 2011. 1. CWP No. 8076 of 2011. Harish Chand. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 2. CWP No. 8079 of 2011. Monika Devi. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 3. CWP No. 8080 of 2011. Manohar Singh. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 4. CWP No. 8081 of 2011. Samarjeet Parmar. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 5. CWP No. 8082 of 2011. Sardar Singh. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 6. CWP No. 8084 of 2011. Sanjay Kumar. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 7. CWP No. 8085 of 2011. Dhian Chand. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 8. CWP No. 8181 of 2011. Gulab Chand. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 9. CWP No. 8182 of 2011. Khub Ram. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 10. CWP No. 8183 of 2011. Chet Ram. Vs. State of H.P. & others. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. 2 For the petitioners : Mr. YPS Dhaulta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim work charge status on completion of eight years of continuous service as daily waged worker. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP No.2735 of 2010 titled Rakesh Kumar versus State of H.P. and others. 2. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. We are informed that the State has filed an appeal against the above mentioned decision. Therefore, it is made clear that the implementation of the judgment referred to above would depend on the outcome of the decision of the Apex Court. The needful action, after verifying the facts will be taken within a period of two months from the date of the judgment of the Apex Court. The petitioner concerned will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 3rd respondent/competent authority. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 28th September, 2011. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (tr) Judge. 3 4