1 ABA 273 OF 2011 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.273 OF 2011 1. Govind Maruti Jare 2. Raju Sahebrao More, 3. Nathaji Suresh Jare, .. Applicants -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr. V.V. Purwant, for the Applicants. Mrs G. P. Mulekar, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 7th April, 2011 P.C. 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail by persons who are alleged to have assaulted to Vilas Potdar and Kaustubh Gajanan Potdar. It is also alleged that one of the miscreants threw chilly powder on the face of complainant’s party and snatched cash, mobile phone etc. The applicants are the purchasers of the property which was sold by first informant's brother Suhas. First informant had even filed Suit in which he had sought temporary injunction against applicants. That application was rejected by the trial Court, on 23rd December, 2010 i.e. before the incident took place on 24th January,2011. Considering the fact that the parties had civil dispute in respect of the property and the considering the 2 ABA 273 OF 2011 nature of allegations made, applicants’ presence in the custody may not be necessary for the purpose of investigation or trial. Therefore, in the event of applicants’ arrest in CR No. 7 of 2011, registered at Atpadi Police Station, District: Sangli, they be released on bail on their furnishing PR Bonds in the sum of Rs.25,000/- by each of them with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate sum of Rs.25,000/- by each of them, on the following conditions. i) The applicants shall make themselvess available on 11th April, 2011 at 10.00 a.m. for interrogation by Investigating Officer and thereafter as and when required Investigating Officer. ii) The applicants shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iii) The applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the trial Court. iv) The order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if chargesheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre -vs- State of Maharashtra and ors, in 3 ABA 273 OF 2011 S.L.P No.7615 of 2009. v) Application stands disposed of. (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)