-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.764 OF 1990 APPEAL NO.764 OF 1990 APPEAL NO.764 OF 1990 Ramling Udhav Jadhav ...Appellant vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr.R.S.Kate for the Appellant Mr.Ujwal Agandsurve for the original complainant Mr.U.V.Nikam,A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : NOVEMBER 21,2006. : NOVEMBER 21,2006. : NOVEMBER 21,2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. For the reasons separately recorded in the Judgment, following is the operative order of the Judgment : i) The order of conviction of the Appellant by Judgment dated 26th October 1990 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur is confirmed. However, the order of substantive sentence is modified. For the offence under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, the Appellant is sentenced to suffer R.I. for 6 years and for the offence under section 304 (II) of the Indian Penal Code the Appellant is sentenced to suffer R.I. for five years. The sentence for the offence under section 506 (II) is confirmed. ii) The order of payment of fine for both the offences and consequent payment of compensation out of the fine amount to P.W.No.10 Rohidas Nichal of Raleras is confirmed. The sentences awarded in default of fine are also confirmed. iii) Rest of the impugned order for directing concurrent running of substantive sentences and disposal of the Muddemal property is confirmed. -2- JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE