IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH AUGUST 2010 / 13TH SRAVANA 1932 Mat.Appeal.No. 686 of 2007() ---------------------------- OP.459/2006 of FAMILY COURT, MALAPPURAM .................... APPELLANT/RESPONDENT IN O.P. ------------------------------------------- MUHAMMED KUTTY, S/O.MUHAMMEDKUTTY, AGED 48 YEARS, NOTTATH VALAPPIL HOUSE, PALLIKKARA AMSOM DESOM, P.O.NANNAMMUKKU, PONNANI TALUK. BY ADV. SMT.PRABHA R.MENON SRI.M.KRISHNAKUMAR RESPONDENT : PETITIONER ------------------------- AVVA UMMA, D/O.ALIKKUTTY, AGED 40 YEARS, AYAMKULANGARA HOUSE, CHAGARAMKULAM, RESIDING AT NEAR SABEEN THEATRE, ALANGODE AMSOM DESOM, P.O.ALANGODE, PONNANI TALUK. ADV. SRI.A.KRISHNAN THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ********************** Mat.Appeal No.686 of 2007 ********************* Dated this the 4th day of August, 2010 JUDGMENT BASANT, J. Parties were referred to a Mediator and it is reported that the parties have settled their disputes before the Mediator. A joint application reporting settlement has been filed. Such petition is signed by both parties and is duly countersigned by their counsel. 2. We accept the joint statement and the compromise reported vide I.A No.2080 of 2010 dated 26.07.2010. 3. The impugned order is one directing the appellant to pay amounts to the respondent. The entire amount due under the impugned decree has already been paid and the entire claim has been settled and an amount of Rs.5,40,000/- (Rupees Five lakhs forty thousand only) has been paid and accepted in full satisfaction of the impugned order, it is reported. Both counsel pray that I.A No.2080 of 2010 may be allowed and the compromise accepted and the appeal allowed in terms of the compromise settlement. Mat.Appeal No.686 of 2007 2 4. We are satisfied that the request can be accepted. 5. In the result: a) I.A.No.2080 of 2010 is allowed; b) The joint compromise statement is accepted; c) Accordingly this appeal is allowed and the impugned order is set aside recording satisfaction; d) The joint compromise petition I.A.No.2080 of 2010 shall be annexed to this judgment; e) Needless to say, the interim order dated 19.12.2007 and all other interim orders shall stand vacated. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE) rtr/