BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Saturday, the Twelfth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.14695 of 2011 1 SELVAMARY 2 POTHISA ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MANAVALAKURUCHI POLICE STATION, KALKULAM TALUK, KANNIYAKUMARI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.320/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT FOR PETITIONER : M/S.SAHAYA PHILOMIN RAJ ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN GOVT. ADVOCATE ( CRL. SIDE) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL UNDER SEC. 438 CR.P.C. ORDER : THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER :- The petitioner has come up with this petition seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.320 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for offences under Sections 294 and 323 of I.P.C. He has also strongly stated in the petition that he is accused of other Sections of yet another Act, which is known to the petitioner. 2.I wonder as to how this petition was numbered by the Registry. Admittedly, Section 294 and 323 are bailable. When the petitioner himself has not come forward with the apprehension of arrest in connection with non-bailable offence, this petition cannot be entertained. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would also submit that in the said crime number, case has been registered under Sections 294(b) and 323 of I.P.C. 4.In such view of the matter, this petition is dismissed. sd/- 12/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / TO Sub-Assistant Registrar 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANAVALAKURUCHI POLICE STATION, KALKULAM TALUK, KANNIYAKUMARI. 2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC TO M/S.SAHAYA PHILOMIN RAJ ADVOCATE SR.NO.39228. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14695 of 2011 1P/4C Date :12/11/2011 RPB : 17.11.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/