?% HW,WI§,W Wm m 200 mm (WW) WWW . mmiwm §wimm SINGLE B CH HO 'B E A ‘ STICE DHIRENDRA MISHQ PETITIONE Smf. mlafa W/o Bhuwan Lal Pafel, aged Plaintiff years! R/o Village Rampur' Bade“ K u Raigarh ahsi! and District Raigarh (CG) Vs Dzfendnms Pafe RESPONDENTs 1. Moh nlal @ Ramkumar Pafai, 5/0 Parasr'am Aged ubouf 36 year's, R/o Villaga— Rqig rh, Disfricf Ruigarh (C.6.) aged abouf 33 year's, R/o Village—Regdu, Posf sambalpuri, Teh$H and Districf Raig rh (6.6.) 27.93.20GS Mr. 5.C. Verma, Advoca’re or The pefii'icner‘. Mr. M.P.5. Bhai‘ia, Advaca for respondem No.1 & 2. nmenf Advacafe for fhe sfafe. Mr. Ajay Dwivedi, Dy, 60 Heard. By 'rhis pe'rifion under A icie 227 af 1he Cansmution of indie The pefifioner has impugned the orde dafed 28.1.2008 [Annexure P-i} whereby fhe applicafions af the pemioner f under Grder 13 Ruiz 10 CPC and Order 8 Rule 1 CPC have been rejected. From peruse! of #he imp ned order if appears fhai' fhe pemioner/ plaintiff had prayed for requisiti ning of the recard of revenue caee pending in 'rhe court of Tehsildan Raigarh on fhe ground 'iha‘i for se‘riiing ‘ihe dispufe t r v i d WW W®W %3Tman%¥r befween The parties The same rejected by fhe caur‘f belaw wi1“l - document of the revenue case, avaiiabie on record arid The def ndunTs in Their wriTTen reply have submiTTed ThaT The cerTified copies 0f The is necessary. However, The same has been 1 an observa'fion ThaT cerTified c0p§e5 of The which The peTiTioner' is referring, is already me may be exhibiTed during The evidence and Therefore, caiiing The abeve reco However, learned counsel for The peTiTioner submiTs Tha‘l‘ This peTiTion may be disposed of wiTh liberTy d rs nTOTKaT ThislsTage. The peTiTioner To file approprioTe applicaTion before The Trial courT in case, f any, objecTion is raised by The oTher side regarding admissibiliTy of The ocumenT daTed 29.7.2004, To which ieorned counsel for The respondenTs have no objecTion. In view of The above! The nsTanT peTiTion is disposed of wiTh The liberTy ThaT The peTiTioner may file o propriaTe applicoTion for producTion of The record in case any objecTion i. evidence. <T' raised by The defendanTs aT The Time of bi L Dhirezldm—Mishral‘ Sd/ Judge Vawrd [VieW