IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 10986 of 1999 Between: PK. Rachel Kumari W/o K.Rama Rao C.M.B.C.Degree College, H.No.51-1-33, Kabadipalem, Near Badikottam, Ongole. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Vice-Chancellor Nagarjuna University, Nagarjuna Nagar, Guntur. 2 Commissioner of College Education Hyderabad. 3 The Regional Joint Director of College Education Guntur. 4 The Samavesam of Telugu Baptist Churches, Rep. by its President- Chairman C.A.M. Compound, Nellore. Dismissed for default as per court order dt 7.3.03 as against R4 5 My. Davind Raju R/o CMBC Degree College for Women, Ongole, Prakasam District. R5 is impleaded as per court order dt. 29.6.1999 in WPMP 14490/99 .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent in not continuing me as a Principal as illegal, and arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and direct the respondents to act my appointment as a Principal and consequently direct them to send all the correspondence and to direct the 4th respondent to issue termination letter or proceedings against Mr. David Raju as a Principal and pass such order or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and prpoper in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.RAGHAVAN K THALAPAKA Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.T.S.HARNATH The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 10986 of 1999 ORDER: Yesterday i.e. on 03.06.2009 when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner was absent. Hence the matter was directed to be listed under the caption for dismissal today. Even today also when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner is absent and there is no representation on his behalf. Hence the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No order as to costs. ---------------- 04.06.2009 kvsn THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 10986 of 1999 04.06.2009 Kvsn