IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL. Writ Petition No. 1197 (S/S) of 2005 Smt. Kanta Devi, Wife of Sri Kirti Singh Bisht, resident of new Tehri Road, Chamba, Tehri‐ Garhwal. …………Petitioner. Versus 1. Nagar Palika Parishad, Tehri Garhwal, New Tehri through its Chairman. 2. Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Tehri Garhwal, New Tehri. ……………Respondents. Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J.: Heard Sri Pankaj Miglani, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri N.S. Pundir, who has accepted notices on behalf of respondents. Learned counsel for both the parties are agree to decide the writ petition at its admission stage. By means of this writ petition the petitioner has prayed to issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to decide the representation to the petitioner dated 15.04.2005, which is annexed as Annexure no. 5 to the writ petition. The submission of the petitioner is that her husband was working with the respondent department. He took voluntary retirement form his post on 10.01.2003. The petitioner, who is the wife of the employee, has made representation before the respondents stating therein that her husband had not consulted the matter with her before opting for voluntary retirement and as such, she is not in a position to carry on with the needs of her family and her family is facing great difficulty. Consequently, a job may be provided to her son in Nagar Palika, Tehri. Leaned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that Board has also passed a resolution dated 31.03.2005 to consider the case of the petitioner on humanitarian ground. However, no action has been taken by the respondents. Petitioner has prayed to direct the respondents to decide her representation. In view of he aforesaid circumstances, I direct the Respondents no. 2 i.e. Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Tehri Garhwal, New Tehri to decide the petitioner’s representation dated 15.04.2005 with a period of four week’s form the date of production of certified copy of this order. With this direction the writ petition is finally disposed of. No order as to costs. (M.M. Ghildiyal, J.) August 24, 2005 SKSharma