1 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.718 OF 2009 Mohd Akram Mohd. Abdulla Momin ..Petitioner -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Smt. Sonia Miskin, appointed advocate for the petitioner. Ms P.H.Kantharia, APP for the State. CORAM: Smt. RANJANA DESAI & R. G. KETKAR, JJ DATED: 29th June, 2009 P.C. 1. Petitioner’s application for parole has been rejected on the ground that though the petitioner has submitted medical certificate regarding illness of his wife, the said certificate does not indicate nature of the illness. The certificate states that the petitioner's wife requires to 2 be operated upon. The said certificate does not even state the date of operation. We, had, therefore, directed the petitioner to give all details and let us know when the operation is to take place. 2. We are informed by Mr G.A. Mankar, Jailor Group II, Nasik Road Central Prison that the order passed by us on l5.6.2009 to the above effect was explained by him to the petitioner. However, the petitioner has written a letter dated 20.6.2009, addressed to this Court stating that after he is released on parole, he is going to get his wife operated. In the absence of specific date on which the operation is to be performed or the nature of illness, it is not possible for us to release the petitioner on parole and hence the petition will have to be dismissed. Petition is dismissed. 3. However, we may note here that if the petitioner makes an appropriate application alongwith the relevant medical papers stating therein the date of operation of his wife or the nature of her illness, his parole application may be considered positively and he may be released on 3 parole on usual terms and conditions. 4. We direct that a copy of this order be communicated to the petitioner in jail. 5. The petition is disposed of. (Smt. RANJANA DESAI, J) (R.G. KETKAR, J)