1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Writ Petition No.715 Of 2007 DISTRICT: NANDED. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s order Coram: A.M. Khanwilkar & S.S. Shinde, JJ. Date: 4th March 2010 ----- 1) None appears for the petitioner. 2) This petition has been presented as Public Interest Litigation making grievance that respondent Nos.2 and 3 have failed to decide the complaint submitted by the petitioner. The learned Assistant Government Pleader has produced before us inquiry report of the Deputy Commissioner (Supply) Aurangabad dated 2nd July 2009 indicating that after due inquiry appropriate steps are being taken. 2 3) Understood thus, nothing survives for consideration in the present petition. Perhaps that is the reason why neither the petitioner nor his Advocate has chosen to remain present before Court today. The fact that the matter has become infructuous does not mean that even the Advocate on record for the petitioner should not appear before the Court to apprise the Court about that position. We deprecate the attitude of the Advocate on record for the petitioner. 4) The petition is dismissed. (S.S. SHINDE,J.)(A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.) rsl/ wp.715.07