1 mss CRPIL+17 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL P.I.L. NO. 17 OF 2008 NATIONAL DALIT MOVEMENT FOR JUSTICE (MAHARASHTRA CHAPTER) .. PETITIONER Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .. RESPONDENT Mr. S. D. Rupwate with M.A.Ingole,Santosh J. Parad i/b Vinod Wagh for the petitioner Mr. P.A. Pol, PP. CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI & RAJESH G. KETKAR, JJ. DATED : 9/3/2011 P.C.: We have heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Mr. Rupawate, learned counsel for the petitioner states that there is substantial compliance with the provisions of The Scheduled Castes and The Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (“the said Act) and the rules made thereunder (“the said Rules), pursuant to the orders passed by 2 mss CRPIL+17 this court. However, some grievances of the petitioner such as the fact that District-level vigilance and monitoring committee is not constituted as per Rule 17 of the said Rules, still remain to be redressed. Mr. Rupwate states that in this behalf, the petitioner will approach the State Government with the remaining grievances. 3. Mr. Pol, learned Public Prosecutor states that the State will take necessary steps to redress the remaining grievances of the petitioner. 4. In view of this statement, the petition can be disposed of and is disposed of. 5. Needless to say that, if the State does not take any steps to comply with the remaining provisions of the said Act and the said Rules, it will be open to the petitioner to approach this court. (SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.) (RAJESH G. KETKAR, J)