Farad Continuation Sheet No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.979/2008 (Chandrakant Thakare ..vs.. sTate & 2 ) ______________________________________________________________ __________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ Mr. Bagade, Advocate for applicant CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : NOVEMBER 17, 2008. Heard counsel for parties. This is an application under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati dismissing the Criminal Revision Application No.160/2006 in default. Notice was issued to the respondents. Respondent no.1 is represented by learned A.P.P. and respondents no.2 and 3 are represented by Advocate Shri V.U. Waghmare. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that it was because of the absence of the applicant on consecutive two occasions that the learned Sessions Judge dismissed the revision. He states that his clients have been unnecessarily dragged into this court and made to incur expenses because of lapses on the part of the applicant. Yet since the revision could not have been dismissed in default and since the learned Judge ought to have seen the record and disposed of the revision on merits, the application is allowed, however, subject to payment of cost of Rs.2000/- to respondent no.2 & 3Costs if not deposited, the same would be recovered by issuing appropriate process by the Sessions Court. JUDGE smp.