1 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR C.A. No. 1562 OF 2007 Mpl. Council Tirora v. Bhandara Zilla Nagar Parishad Kamgar Sanghatana & ors. _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders Mr.M.I.Dhatrak Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.F.I. Khan Advocate for Res. 1, 2A to 2C. .... CORAM: A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 11 th OCTOBER, 2007. Delay condoned on the concession given by Mr.Khan, learned counsel for respondents. C.A. No. 1562/07 allowed. M.C.A. St. No. 2961/07 The petitioner has sought review of the order made by this Court on 17.7.2006, reading of which shows that the same is based on the consent of both the parties. The only ground in the review application that is raised is that the counsel for review petitioner 2 was not authorised to furnish consent to this Court. Mr.Khan, learned counsel for respondents, however, pointed out that there is a resolution dated 29.10.2001 made by the Municipal Council – petitioner (Annexure- R1) by which decision was taken consciously by the petitioner to follow the orders of the Court and make all the payments to the employees. It is thus clear that the consent is not based on the counsel' s statement, but the consent is based on a resolution dated 29.10.2001 passed by the Standing Committee. The ground raised is therefore frivolous. The petition is, therefore, rejected with costs of Rs. 2000/- payable to the respondents -employees within four weeks . JUDGE /TA/