THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO S.A.M.P.NO.1116 OF 2011 AND S.A.No.1529 OF 2007 DATE: 28.04.2011 BETWEEN: Mohd. Mukhtar Ali .. Appellant And Mrs Masood Jahan .. Respondent THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO S.A.M.P.NO.1116 OF 2011 AND S.A.No.1529 OF 2007 JUDGMENT: Both parties and the learned counsel appearing on either side are present. The terms of the compromise have been read over and explained to the parties. The parties have agreed to the terms of the compromise. The landlady admits that in view of the compromise, the possession of the schedule property was handed over to her on 26.04.2011. She also agreed that she has received an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- from the tenant towards rent due as per settlement arrived at between the parties, though actual amount due is Rs.3,89,000/-. Recording the above said terms of compromise, S.A.M.P.No.1116 of 2011 is allowed and consequently, the second appeal is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ Date:28.04.2011 R. KANTHA RAO, J Kvrm THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO S.A.M.P.NO.1116 OF 2011 AND S.A.No.1529 OF 2007 DATE: 28.04.2011