HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI$GARH AT BILASPUR DlVISlO& BENCH CORAM: HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. HON’BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. W Wri‘A i PR No.1956i2009 LO A’ 2ZO703 Memo Qf Writ Aggeal gnder Section 2 m of Me Ghhagisgg High Court iAggeal to Division Bench) Ag, g00$ Present : Shri UN Awasthy, Senior Counsel with Shri MK Sinha, counsel for the appellant f Bank Judgment (2" July, 2009) The following judgment of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri UN Awasthy, learned Senior Counsel is heard on the question of maintainability of the writ appeal. a u} geek. m gagellants 1 under Sectien 3 of the Respondents incorporated Companies (Acquisition & Banking of Undertakings) Act, 1970, Transfer Office at 12, Old Court with Head Moikata 700001 (W3) House Street, — 2 Assistant General Manager Authority), UCO Bank, (Disciplinary Office, 97, Anand Nagar, Regional RaigurgCGi 3 Sr Branch Manager UCO BANK, Civic Branch, Bhiiai, District Burg Centre QCGI VERsUS Rgsgondem JK ShrivastaVa, S/o Late Shri AK aged about 52 years, ALPM Petitioner shrivastva, (Under Suspension) UCO Operator (Under Civic Centre Branch, Bhilai, Rio Bank, MPEB Office, Shantinagar Near Old District Burg“; 3 Bhiiai 2) Appellant/Bank has med this writ appeal against the impugned order dated 25.02.2009, passed in WP No.3266I2003 ‘ 3) The impughed order dated 25.02.2009 reads as foiiows: “Shri Ashish Shrivastva, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri UN Awasthy, Sr Advocate with Shri MK Sinha. Advocate for the-respondents. Call on for final hearing in the month of June, 2009.” 4) From the above quoted impugned order dated 25.02.2009. we do not find anything in the order which may give rise to the filing of the writ appeal. 5) The writ appeal, therefore, is dismissed as not maintainable. SdL f sw— Sunil Kumar Sinha l Judge Lii .A , Chief Justice l padma t