IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11517 of 2011 HARI NARAYAN SAO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ------- 4 08.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Originally, informant filed a complaint case which was converted into Naubatpur P.S. Case no. 230/2010. Petitioner appeared in matriculation examination showing his date of birth as 25.2.1948 and subsequently, he appeared in Madhma examination showing his date of birth as 20.2.1952. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has every right to get corrected his date of birth. So, even if the prosecution story assumed to be true, then also, no offence is made out. Although the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is refuted by the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the informant but considering the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Hari Narayan Sao be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur in Naubatpur P.S. Case no. 230 of 2010. Shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)