1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 379 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 379 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 379 OF 2006 Mr. R.S. Keluskar ... Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Petitioner in person present. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : MARCH 20, 2006 DATED : MARCH 20, 2006 DATED : MARCH 20, 2006 P.C. . The Petitioner is a practicing advocate. The relief sought for in this petition really amounts to total abuse of the process of the court. The Petitioner seeks to challenge the decision of the State of Maharashtra whereby the appointment to the Labour Court, Industrial Tribunals are to be done under the supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court. Considering that the High Court exercises supervisory jurisdiction over the tribunals, under article 227 of the Constitution of India, the appointments to these posts considering articles 233 to 235 have to be done under the control of the High Court. The learned Division Bench of this 2 court in the matter of Labour Courts had so held and that judgement has been affirmed by the Apex Court. The Petition therefore, is totally devoid of merits apart from being an abuse of the process of the court. Petition dismissed. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.)