IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.102 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.405 OF 2009 Rupal Mayur Doshi ...Petitioner V/s. Mayur Jaswantray Doshi ...Respondent ...... Mrs.Hansa Ashar Mehta i/b Mr.B.B.Parekh for Petitioner. Ms.Sheela Tambe i/b Mr.Manoj Bhatt for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. MARCH 26, 2009. MARCH 26, 2009. MARCH 26, 2009. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. Perused the impugned order. For the reasons recorded therein, no interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction is warranted in the fact situation of the present case. For, the order impugned is a discretionary order and passed for good reasons. Dismissed. 3. Request made in Civil Application cannot be entertained. Both parties have to share the : 2 : Mediator’s fees equally. Moreso, when the Applicant willingly participated in the mediation proceedings without any demur. The relief claimed is therefore rejected. The Applicant shall ensure that the balance amount to be paid to the Mediator is made over at the earliest and not later than four weeks from today, failing which, it will be open to the Respondent to inform the Trial Court about the lapse committed by the Applicant, in which case, the Trial Court may consider passing order of striking of the defence of the Applicant, if so advised. All questions in that behalf are left open. 4. Copy of this order be forwarded to the Coordinator, High Court Mediation Centre for information and necessary action. 5. The Court expresses word of gratitude to the Mediator for having put in sincere effort to guide the parties to amicably settle the dispute. Copy of this order be also forwarded to the Mediator. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.