IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 19837 of 2008 Date of Decision: 6.1.2009. Gurmeet Kaur ---Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others ---Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. G.P. Vashisht, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Chahal, D.A.G., Punjab for respondents no. 1 to 4. Mr. Jatinder Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.5. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) It is not disputed that the controversy involved in the present petition is squarely covered by the judgement dated January 20, 2004 passed in CWP No. 891 of 2003, wherein following observations were made:- “ In view of the above, the instant writ petitions are dismissed in so far as the claim of the petitioners for dearness allowance on family pension is concerned, however, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed in respect of the recovery sought to be made from them. In case any recovery has been made from the petitioners in the interregnum, the same shall be refunded to the petitioners within a period of four months from today.” This petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the aforesaid judgement. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 6.1.2009 lucky