HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6915 OF 2007 ORDER: The petitioner is the immediate neighbour of the 4th respondent at Warasiguda, Secunderabad. His grievance is that though the 4th respondent made construction, contrary to the sanctioned plan, the respondents 1 to 3 did not take any steps. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents 1 to 3 and the learned counsel for the 4th respondent. 3. The record discloses that the 4th respondent was sanctioned a plan and thereafter, a revised plan. Any construction made in deviation thereafter, would certainly affect the rights of the petitioner. The respondents 1 to 3 are under obligation to ensure that the construction made or to be made by the 4th respondent, is in accordance with the sanctioned plan. 4. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing that the respondents 1 to 3 shall ensure that the construction made by the 4th respondent does not deviate from the sanctioned or revised plan. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J March 03, 2011. KTL