1 wp9403.sxw ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9403 OF 2009 Dilip P. Kurhade ...Petitioner vs. Special Recovery & Sale Officer and others ...Respondents Mr.R.V.Govilkar for the petitioner Mr.Amit Borkar for the respondent no.1 CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : OCTOBER 4, 2010 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated 14th July 2009 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar by which Misc. Application no.59 of 2009 filed by the petitioner has been rejected. The petitioner filed the revision application for challenging the order of attachment dated 19th November 2007. There was a delay in filing the revision application and therefore, Misc. Application no.59 of 2008 was preferred by the petitioner for condonation of delay in filing the revision application. By the impugned order, the said application has been rejected. 2 It is not necessary to interfere with the impugned order in writ jurisdiction for the simple reason that a remedy of raising an objection to attachment in accordance with sub rule 19 of rule 107 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules,1961 is available to the petitioner. The petitioner can raise an 2 wp9403.sxw objection to the order of attachment which will have to be investigated into in accordance with sub rule 19 of rule 107 of the said Rules. 3 In view of the availability of the said remedy, writ petition is not entertained and the same is disposed of by keeping the said remedy open. JUDGE