IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 19TH JUNE 2009 / 29TH JYAISHTA 1931 RP.No. 276 of 2007(L) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.6209/1997 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER/PETITIONERS -------------------------------------------- 1. ACHAMMA OUSEPH,PANAKKAL HOUSE, CHERUKADAPPURAM, NORTH KUTHIATHODE P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. ANTO P.O,PANAKKAL HOUSE, CHERUKADAPPURAM, NORTH KUTHIATHODE P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. BABY P.O., PANAKKAL HOUSE, CHERUKADAPPURAM, NORTH KUTHIATHODE P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. PAPPACHAN P.O, PANAKKAL HOUSE, CHERUKADAPPURAM, NORTH KUTHIATHODE P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. VALSA GEORGE, PANAKKAL HOUSE, CHERUKADAPPURAM, NORTH KUTHIATHODE P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. JOLLY JOSE,PANAKKAL HOUSE, CHERUKADAPPURAM, NORTH KUTHIATHODE P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 7. SHINEY TOMY,PANAKKAL HOUSE, CHERUKADAPPURAM, NORTH KUTHIATHODE P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 8. SAINA ANTO, PANAKKAL HOUSE, CHERUKADAPPURAM, NORTH KUTHIATHODE P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE J.MATHAIKAL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT LOCAL ADMINISTTRATION DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE CHIEF INSPECTOR OF BOARDS,ERNAKULAM 3. THE DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATHS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE PUTHENVELIKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH REP.BY ITS SECRETARY,PUTHENVELIKKARA,ERNAKULAM 683 504. 5. PANKAJAKSHAN NAIR, GOVINDAVILANOM, MILLS ROAD, NORTH PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM DIST. ADV. SRI.M.P.ASHOK KUMAR FOR R4 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.MEERA. SRI.JOHNSON MANAYANI FOR R5 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------------- R.P.276 of 2007 in O.P.No.6209/1997 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 19th June, 2009. O R D E R This is a review petition at the instance of the petitioners. The writ petition was disposed of in the light of the submission made by the respondents that the matter has been settled. But it is pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the matter has not actually been settled and that the writ petition requires to be considered on merits. The issue pertains to transfer of ownership of a boat. In view of the fact that the dispute is still alive, the review petition is allowed and the judgment dated 7.7.2005 in O.P.No.6209/1997 is recalled. Post the Original Petition for hearing as per the roster. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. tgs KURIAN JOSEPH, J ---------------------------------------------- R.P.276 of 2007 in O.P.No.6209/1997 ---------------------------------------------- O R D E R Dated 19th June, 2009.