IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM TUESDAY, THE 29TH MARCH 2011 / 8TH CHAITHRA 1933 RP.No. 1006 of 2010() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN LAA.480/2003 Dated 05/07/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENT IN LAA --------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, LA KOZHIKODE. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. T.T.JOSEPHINA RESPONDENT(S): APPELLANT IN LAA ------------------------------- VALUVIL DEVI, P.O.ERANHIKKAL, KARANNUR DESOM, ELATHUR VILLAGE, KOZHIKODE. SRI.M.C.SEN, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.M.P.SREEKRISHNAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ----------------------------------------------- RP. No. 1006 of 2010 in LAA. No. 480 of 2003 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of March, 2011 O R D E R Pius C.Kuriakose, J. Even though apparently attractive grounds have been raised in this memorandum of review petition and Smt. T.T.Josephina, learned Govt. Pleader addressed strenuous arguments before us based on those grounds we are not persuaded to review our judgment. As stated in the judgment, even the reference court relied on Ext.A1. A1 reflected a value of Rs.30,000/- per cent. On behalf of the Government it was submitted before us referring to another judgment pertaining to acquisition in Vengeri Village that the claimants may be justified in aspiring for fixation of the value at Rs.25,875/- per cent. We refixed the land value at Rs.30,000/- per cent (the value reflected in A1) taking into account various judgments of this court pertaining to acquisition of lands in various villages of Kozhikode Taluk for RP. 1006/10 -2- the purpose of construction of Kozhikode byepass. We notice that to Ext.C-1 report recommending higher value the Government did not file any objections. We do not find any justification for invocation of our review jurisdiction within the well defined contours of Order 47 Rule 1. The RP will stand dismissed. (PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE) (C.K. ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE) ksv/-