IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 21ST OCTOBER 2011 / 29TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 27954 of 2011(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. BIBIN K.ANAND, 8TH SEMESTER STUDENT, B.TECH (ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING), SNM INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY, MALIANKARA, NORTH PARAVUR, RESIDING AT KUTTALA HOUSE, KAIPAMANGALAM P.O., KALAMURI, THRISSUR. 2. NIKHIL M.M., 8TH SEMESTER STUDENT, B.TECH (ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING), SNM INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY, MALIANKARA, NORTH PARAVUR, RESIDING AT MORIYAKKATT HOUSE, CHERAI, BEACH ROAD. 3. ROJI GEO JOSEPH, 8TH SEMESTER STUDENT, B.TECH (MECHANICAL ENGINEERING), SAINTGITS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, PATHAMUTTOM, KOTTAYAM, RESIDING AT NARAYAN PARAMBIL HOUSE, THURAVOOR P.O., CHERTHALA. BY ADV. SRI.K.JAJU BABU SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM-686 560, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM-686 560. SRI.T.A.SHAJI, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.27954/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER FOR REVALUATION DTD.10.10.11 ALONG WITH CHALLAN. EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER FOR REVALUATION DTD.17.10.2011 ALONG WITH CHALLAN. EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER FOR REVALUATION DTD.12.10.2011 ALONG WITH CHALLAN. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 27954 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 21st day of October, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners are B.Tech students. When the result of the 4th Semester examination was declared, petitioners 1 and 2 failed in one paper, viz., “Signals and Systems” and the 3rd petitioner failed in “Machine Tools”. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the University for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp