In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 4331 of 2010 Date of Decision: 15.7.2010 Jeet Singh …Petitioner Versus Joginder Singh …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. H.S. Dhindsa, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) The respondent/plaintiff had filed a suit for recovery of Rs.13,090/- on the basis of a pronote. He had examined the attesting witnesses of the pronote and proved its execution. Both the Courts below gave a concurrent finding that the petitioner was liable to pay the amount. In the present revision petition, neither any substantial question of law has been proposed nor any arises as the entire case is based upon the appreciation of evidence. The petitioner has raised a plea before both the Courts below that he neither borrowed the amount nor executed any pronote or receipt. Both the Courts below have considered the evidence of scribe and attesting witnesses and decreed the suit. Hence, no interference is warranted in the present revision petition and the same is hereby dismissed in limine. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge July 15, 2010 “DK”