IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 15TH DECEMBER 2009 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 12003 of 2007(D) --------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. P.SIROSH, CHERIYANATTUVELI, CHERTHALA. 2. SREEKUMAR N.K., MADASSERIL HOUSE, THIRUVANKULAM P.O., NEAR KESHAVAPADY, TRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM. 3. MICHAIL K.M., S/O.MARCILY, KAMPOTATH, ANTHAKARAN AZGHI, CHERTHALA. 4. ANISH JOHN, KUCHAPADAM HOUSE, VILLOONNI P.O., ARPOOKKARA, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. MR.S.RAMESH BABU. RESPONDENT: ---------------------- KERALA STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, ERNAKULAM. BY MR.MAJNU KOMATH, SC, K.S.W.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/12/2009, ALONG WITH W.P.(C).NO.12821/2007,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.12003/2007-D: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 18/08/2005. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE TERMINATION ORDER DTD. 03/02/2007. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBIT: EXT.R1.A: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.5183/2007 DTD. 02/04/2007. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. Prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) Nos.12003/07 & 12821/07 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of December, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioners were contract appointees under the first respondent Corporation. Their services were terminated and that is called in question in these writ petitions. 2. It is now pointed out by the Standing Counsel appearing for the first respondent Corporation that similar orders of termination were challenged before this court in WP(c). No.5813/07. That writ petition was dismissed and the judgment was confirmed in W.A. No.2050/07, by judgment dated 19th September,2007. It is also pointed out that the aforesaid judgment has been confirmed by the Apex Court by dismissing SLP(Civil).No.24332/07. In view of the aforesaid judgments, since the issue raised in these writ petitions is concluded against the petitioners, these writ petitions are dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :