Civil Writ Petition No.6622 of 2008 1` IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.6622 of 2008 Decided on : 17.12.2008 Karan Singh and others. ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others. ....Respondents. **** CORAM:HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JORA SINGH. **** Present: Mr.Shailendra Jain, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Ashish Kapoor, Addl. A.G., Haryana, for respondents No.1, 2 & 4. Mr.Dheeraj Chawla, Advocate, for respondent No.3. **** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest. M.M.Kumar, J The petitioners have approached this Court for quashing the impugned notifications dated 08.06.2007 and 27.02.2008 (Annexures P11 and P14), issued under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for bravity 'the Act) whereby the Government has sought to acquire the Civil Writ Petition No.6622 of 2008 2` land for public purpose namely for extension of Industrial Growth in village Rudh, Chirahara, Banipur, Bawal, Tehsil Bawal, District Rewari. When the matter came up for consideration on 30.07.2008, the learned counsel for the petitioners stated that the award was yet to be announced and after giving notice to learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana and other respondents, we have granted liberty to the petitioners to move an appropriate application as to when notice under Section 9 of the Act, is issued. On application filed by the petitioners, this Court has stayed dispossession till the next date of hearing and on 22.10.2008, the said order has been continuing. At the hearing today, learned counsel for respondent No.3 has stated that the respondents have considered the question of releasing the land of the writ petitioners from acquisition. He has further stated that the land belonging to all the petitioners have been fully released except the land of petitioners No.1, 8, 18, 20 & 21. In respect of petitioner No.1 Karan Singh, petitioner No.8 Satpal, petitioner No.18 Smt.Bharpai, petitioner No.20 Arvind Kumar and petitioner No.21 Ram Kishore, the land is stated to have been released but partly. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the afore- mentioned factual position. However, learned counsel for the petitioners has prayed that the writ petition be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous in respect of the land of the petitioners whose entire land has been released, but in respect of petitioners No.1, 8, 18, 20 & 21, he applies for grant of liberty to move appropriate representation to respondent No.1 for releasing their land, if it is possible, in accordance with law. In view of the above, the present writ petition has been Civil Writ Petition No.6622 of 2008 3` rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. However the petitioners No.1, 8, 18, 20 and 21 are at liberty to move appropriate representation(s) for seeking further release of their land. The needful shall be done within a period of one month under Registered A.D. cover. If any such representation is made, the same shall be considered by respondent No.1 and be disposed of within two month from the date of receipt of such representation. (M.M.KUMAR) JUDGE December 17, 2008 (JORA SINGH) mamta-II JUDGE