IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI TUESDAY, THE 6TH JANUARY 2009 / 16TH POUSHA 1930 LA.App..No. 1 of 2009() ----------------------- LAR.22/2004 of SUB COURT, CHERTHALA .................... APPELLANTS/ 2ND RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------- THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, K.S.I.D.C., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.D.KRISHNANKUTTY PILLAI SRI.SHEEJO CHACKO RESPONDENTS: CLAIMANTS AND IST RESPONDENT ------------------------------------------- 1. LAKSHMANAN, MANNANADIYIL, PALLIPPURAM. 2. SUMATHI, W/O.LAKSHMANAN, DO. DO. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.A) INDUSTRIAL GROWTH CENTRE, CHERTHALA. BY SR.GOVT.PLEADER SHRI P.K.BABU FOR R3 THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & M.C. HARI RANI,JJ ============================== L.A.A. NO.1 OF 2009 ============================ DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY 2008 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose,J. It is fairly submitted by the learned Senior Government Pleader Sri.P.K. Babu that enhancement at the rate granted by the Reference Court in the impugned judgment has been approved not only by this Court but also by the Supreme court in identical cases. In the above circumstances, we do not find any ground to admit this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal will stand dismissed in limine. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE M.C. HARI RANI, JUDGE ks. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & M.C. HARI RANI,JJ ============================== C.M.APPLN. 3 OF 209 IN L.A.A. NO.1 OF 2009 ============================ DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY 2008 ORDER Pius C.Kuriakose,J. We are inclined to condone the delay even without issuing notice to the respondents, since we find that it will be possible to dispose of the appeal in favour of the respondents. The delay is condoned and the appeal is considered for admission. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE M.C. HARI RANI, JUDGE ks.