IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 2432 of 2010 alongwith CWPs No. 2437, 2438 and 2451 of 2010. Date of Decision : May 28, 2010 CWP No. 2432 of 2010 Govind Ram versus State of H.P. & another CWP No. 2437 of 2010 Laxman Dass Sharma versus State of H.P. & another CWP No. 2438 of 2010 Rattan Dass versus State of H.P. & another CWP No. 2451 of 2010 Amar Singh Chauhan Versus State of H.P. & another. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner(s) : Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. R. K. Sharma, Senior Add. Advocate General for the respondents. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Petitioners in these cases claimed the benefit of revised pensionary benefits by taking into account past service rendered by them under the Panchayat Samiti. It is seen that the same issue has been considered by the Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal leading to order dated 8.5.2002 in OA (D) No. 283 of 1996. We also find that the judgment has been upheld by this Court in CWP No. 1802 of 2002 on 31.7.2008. It is not in dispute that the State has 2 accepted the judgment in principal and has implemented the same. Therefore, in the above circumstances this writ petition is disposed of directing the competent among the respondents to examine the case of the petitioners herein and take appropriate action in the light of the judgments referred to above without discriminating the petitioners. Benefits if any flowing out of such consideration shall be disbursed to the petitioners within a period of three months from the date of production of the copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. May 28, 2010 (PK)