IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Appeal from Order No.659 OF 2007. Appeal from Order No.659 OF 2007. Appeal from Order No.659 OF 2007. Dattatray Nana Dhumal ..Appellant versus Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai. ..Respondent. Mr.V.A.Thorat i/b. A.r.Pandey for the Appellant Mr.J.J.Xavier for the Respondent. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Dated : 31st August, 2007 Dated : 31st August, 2007 Dated : 31st August, 2007 P.C. 1. Heard learned Senior Advocate Mr.Thorat for the Appellant. Also heard loearned Advocate for the BMC. It was suggested on behalf of the respondents that they have not filed their say in the Notice of Motion, hence, they will file the same and the Trial Court be directed to dispose of the Notice of Motion expeditiously and in the mean time the Corportion will not take any coercive steps. Hence, I pass the following order ORDER . BMC to file reply in the Notice of Motion within three weeks from today and tereafter the trial court to dispose of the Notice of Motion as -2- expeditiously as possible and in any event till 31.10.2007. . Liberty given to the plaintiff to carry out the necessary amendment in the plaint. . A.O. disposed of in above terms. (S.R.Sathe, J.) (S.R.Sathe, J.) (S.R.Sathe, J.)