^ nE liBtfc twrevs ^ 00 .^. i ^t&rt»*>"" IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRITPETITION N0./^^ 12006 <> PETITIONER ..-• .^^ ^yy •€^/ ' ^^ RESPONDENTS ^!>^^t z\v' o^" SMT. B. SUNDARA RAO, W/0. SHRI B. TATA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, ASSISTANT TEACHER, IU.V.N RAO IWEIVIORIAL PRE MIDDLE SCHOOL, KHURSIPAR 20NE -3 BHILAI, DISTRICT- DURG (C.G.) VERSUS STATEOF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, D.K.S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR (CHHATTISGARH) HEAD MASTER, M.V.N RAO IUEMORIAL PRE MIDDLE SCHOOL, KHURSIPAR ZONE -3 BHILAI, DISTRICT - DURG (C.G.) ob WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner humbly begs to submit as under:- \3-cEt-eilOI«<t;:»TT|<H<|^Rlril^)y< *tj^«iaf'rf^ ^Of \^^lo^ 3nt9ICRq?(i^tgci%) an^TSRiftgre aaitaii^CTsiwiw 1'!.' •))|<I[CT<I)'I fit«Y^'fa><s)'(Ri'^i'( ^3rf^*ri3]i$?r Shri Anoop Mazumdar, coun^el for the petitioner. Shri Wiw!f Pandey, Panel Low^er for the State. Heard. Lefu-ned counwl for the pe^ltKWiet- submits •that under Rule 33(i) of Chhatti^arh Ashaskiya | Shikriian SefWthen (Adihye^ko Tatha Anya Kwmachariyon Ke Vet^no Ka Sandaya) Adhimyom, 1978, Ihe petitioner is entitled to get th^ benefits where the ©overnment grwit is being yven to the sc^te correqwnding c«rt'e9»-iesof employees in ©overnmienteducatio^ial institutions. On the other hand. le<irne<( ceunset appew'WQ for the State, submits thnt the petitioner has straightoiKoy filed Ihis patltion without aerving notice for demand ofjusti«s. In tha* view of the nwtter|, Shri Msawndat', leorned counsel for the petitioner, prays that th^ petitioner m<y be permitted to make a detoiled representatfon b^fore the competent cuthority of the respondents, whteh shall be considered on its oiwn merits in aftcordance with ha». . The proyer 'is iwt opposect ^y th< other- side. Having considered and wi't^iout expressirg any opinion on the of this Court, ends of just'ice «»iH )»thepetitioner to mAe o detated ffleritsof the case, in the opinioii be served if a dh'ection is given 1^ SP/FS/2' representaMon raising her gr|ey<mces befofe •Hie competent XI-HC-78 *ii*i»igpTi^ d-oT) ^i<iin«,y<ffl<M<i<«,f6|rti'<iy'< .....^?.?....l?.^:.el[?.h W^200 SIT^STWS (^cli^d^i) sn^ngiTR-ii* wnan^nipqW ^ ©owri VJ..^ <^ f^ <? -"^ t^ftli a copy of •the p^itton and t, andon auch repreaent-uMon jthorfty ^f Ihe respondents shall deehie ac4opdonce with low as em'ty as period oflthree months fr«nthe dat'e of. ^u'rtiority of the respondents alorg |this order, within a period of one moifrth, being filed, thecompetent authorfty ^f Ihe respondent |the same on !ts own merits in possible preferably urtthin a i^ceipt of the representat'ion. It is |stil( remains, the petitioner mcy w<rit| I(B»inckidin9 filin9 of petition. With the oforesdd obserih (dteposed of. Certified copy as per rules. <m<ifo)<ili *<i*i»l#fct3 'iRiit^K i|>ari^<l3ii^?i clear that if ony grieytnee the medy avcuN>le under the trt'ioiB, Ihis petitton stonds Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge