IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 19TH JULY 2011 / 28TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 19551 of 2011(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER:- ------------------ JAYADEVAN G,CHITTY PROSECUTING INSPECTOR, O/O.IG OF REGISTRATION (UNDER ORDRE OF TRANSFER AS SUB REGISTARAR,VITHURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM) BY ADV. SMT.P.V.ASHA SMT.VINEETHA B. RESPONDENTS:- --------------------- 1. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695035 2. SRI.T.M.SREEKUMAR, SUB REGISTRAR O/O.THE IG OF REGISTRATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 3. SMT.LILLYBHAI, SUB REGISTRAR, VITHURA (UNDER ORDERS OF TRASFER AS SUB REGISTRAR THITHALA, PALAKKAD) 4. KUMARI K.R.BINA, SUB REGISTRAR, THRITHALA, PALAKKAD (UNDER ORDERS OF TRASFER AS SUB REIGSTRAR, KANYAKULANGARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM) BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.SUNITHA SUKUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 19551 of 2011(T) APENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- P1: COPY OF ORDER NO.E1/8647/2011 DTD.6/7/2011. P2: COPY OF REPRESENTATION DTD.7/7/2011 OF PETITIONER TO 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL. ( TRUE COPY ) PA TO JUDGE. Kvs/- C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No.19551 of 2011-T. = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 19th July, 2011. J U D G M E N T This writ petition has been filed mainly challenging Ext.P1 order of transfer. According to the petitioner, he was transferred from the present station only to accommodate the 2nd respondent who got promotion to the post of Sub Registrar only on April, 2011. On promotion, the 2nd respondent was posted as Sub Registrar, Kanyakulangara. It is only to accommodate the petitioner as Sub Registrar in the office of the I.G. of Registration that the petitioner has now been transferred, it is contended. As regards the petitioner, he rejoined the office of the I.G. of Registration as Chitty Prosecuting Officer, only on 24.5.2011 and therefore, going by the transfer norms there is absolutely no justification to transfer the petitioner from the said office within a couple of months, it is contended. Feeling aggrieved by Ext.P1 order, the petitioner submitted WP(C).No.19551/2011-T. 2 Ext.P2 representation before the first respondent, which is still pending consideration. Taking into account the fact that the petitioner has already been relieved pursuant to Ext.P1 and that Ext.P2 representation is pending before the first respondent, I am inclined to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 representation expeditiously, with notice to the petitioner and respondents 2 to 4. At any rate, this shall be done within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. C.T. RAVIKUMAR, (Judge) Kvs/-