1 ^1.3 .1,^)^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P. (S) N0. ^6 ^U 1 2009 S.B. PETITIONER y" VERSUS RESPONDENTS -^^ .%^' ..^^y' ^••^'.^ ?^^%)--'" ^y.y ^'" ^ Bechu Lal Bharia, S/o Basori Lal, aged about 27 years, R/o Village+Post Bagdi, Post - Bacharwar, P.S.- Pendra, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through - Revenue Secretary, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, Distt. Raipur(C.G.) Registrar, Co-operative Society Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) High Power Cast Scrutiny Committee of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Sub Divisional Officer, Pendra Road, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) ^WRIT PETITION ORDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA H!GH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH : BILASPUR WRn:.PETmONJS)_N_g,2624,OF2009 PETlTiONER . Bechu Lai Bharia RiSPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petltion under ArticSes 226/227 ofthe Constltution of india) Single Bench : Hon'bSe Shri Satish K, Agnihotri, J, Present:- Shri Somkant Verma, counsei for the petjtioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. (ORAU (Passed on thls 21st day of Januap/, 2010) 1. At the very outset, jearned counsei appearlng for the petitioner submlts-that he does not to press the reliefs soyght for in thls petitlon, however, the respondent aythoritles may be directed to decJde the memo dated 18-2-2009 (Annexyre - P/4) issued by the Sub Dlvislonal Officer (Revenue), Pendra Road, District Biiaspur, within a period of four weeks, as the High Power Caste -Scrytiny Commlttee has almost 1 1 months to decide the •issue and o!n accoynt of the same the petitloner is not in a posltion to appSy or seek appointment on any post. 2. At thls juncture, Searned coynsel appearing for tha subnnits 'that the case of the petitloner wlSi be co'nsldered and decicSed In view of the memo dated 18-2-2009 and in accordance with law v/rthin a period of four weeks from the of reoelpt of a copy of this order. 3. In viev/ of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearlng for the petitioner,nothing sun/ivesin this petition for adjudication. 4. AccordingSy, the writ petition is disposed of. :.—- cy^. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge