IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM MONDAY, THE 23RD MAY 2011 / 2ND JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 11300 of 2011(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- NABEESA.P,MALAYIL PARAKKAL,P.O.PULIKKAL, MALAPPURAM-673637. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.BOSE SRI.VINOD MADHAVAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SYNDICATE BANK,REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER,REGIONAL OFFICE,IST FLOOR, PIONEER TOWER,SHANMUGHAM ROAD,ERNAKULAM, PIN-682031. 2. SYNDICATE BANK,REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL OFFICER,BROTHER COMPEX,BROTHER GARDEN, BYE PASS ROAD,KONDOTTY-673638. BY SRI.R.S.KALKURA - SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J --------------------------------------- W.P(C) No.11300 of 2011-J ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of May, 2011. J U D G M E N T It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the respondent Bank that the petitioner had failed to comply with the conditions stipulated in the interim order dated 12.4.2011, for payment of a sum of Rs.2,50,000/-. By virtue of the said interim order, the respondent Bank was directed to permit re-occupation of the petitioner in the property in question, which was taken over possession under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act). It is further submitted that since the petitioner had failed to comply with the condition, the Bank had proceeded with further steps for sale of the property. 2. When the matter came up for consideration today, there was no representation for the petitioner. Under the above circumstances, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition any further. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. C.K.ABDUL REHIM JUDGE ab