1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:03.03.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN WP(MD)No.2050 of 2011 Chinna Thevar :Petitioner -Vs- 1.Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Usilampatti at Thirumangalam, Jawahar Street, Thirumangalam, Madurai District. 2.Sale Officer, Office of the Deputy Registrar of Co-opearative Societies, Usilamapatti at Thirumangalam, Jawahar Street, Madurai District. :Respondents PRAYER:Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to dispose of the petition filed under Rule 135 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983, dated 14.06.2010 against the conditional order of attachment of the first respondent in NO.CAEP 29/2010-11, dated 09.06.2010 and in No.CAEP 29/2010-11/ARC 15/2010, dated 08.06.2010. For Petitioner :Mr.V.O.S.Kalaiselvam For Respondents :Mr.S.Shanmugavel,Addl. Govt. Pleader ORDER The petitioner seeks a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to dispose his revision filed under Rule 135 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Rules, challenging the conditional orders, dated 08.06.2010 and 09.06.2010, on the file of the second respondent. 2.The second respondent appears to have initiated proceedings against the petitioner for attachment of properties, on the basis of the loan granted to his son. According to the petitioner, he was not a surety to the creditor and as such it was not open to the sale officer to attach his properties. Therefore, the order of attachment passed by the second respondent was challenged before the first respondent invoking Rule 135 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Rules. The revision petition was filed on 14.06.2010. Since there was no follow up action, the petitioner is before this Court. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3.The revision petition filed by the petitioner was against the order of attachment passed by the second respondent. It was a statutory revision and as such the first respondent was expected to dispose of the revision as expeditiously as possible. 4.Therefore, I am of the view that the matter requires emergent consideration by the first respondent. 5.Accordingly, the first respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the revision stated filed by the petitioner on 14.06.2010 against the orders passed by the second respondent on 08.06.2010 and 09.06.2010, on merits and as per law. Such exercise shall be completed within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt a copy of this order. 6.The Writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. No Costs. SD/- Assistant Registrar (P&A) / TRUE COPY / Sub Assistant Registrar To: 1.Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Usilampatti at Thirumangalam, Jawahar Street, Thirumangalam, Madurai District. 2.Sale Officer, Office of the Deputy Registrar of Co-opearative Societies, Usilamapatti at Thirumangalam, Jawahar Street, Madurai District. +1CC to Mr.V.O.S.Kalaiselvam, Advocate. SR.No.11349. PM RP/16.03.2011/2P/4C. WP(MD)No.2050 of 2011 03.03.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/