IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.3563 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 25.5.2010 M/s Haryana Explosives Pvt.Ltd. ....Petitioner Versus The Authority under the Minimum Wages Act and Ors. ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr. Diwan S.Adlakha, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. C.M.No.14133-CII of 2010 Allowed as prayed for. C.R.No.3563 of 2010 The petitioner is aggrieved by the order by which the respondent-Union has been permitted to be impleaded as a party. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the Union is unregistered and that the members who are representing the Union are not the workers. I am afraid this plea of the petitioner cannot render the impugned order unjust for the simple reason that the dispute is regarding payment of wages and the petitioner is at liberty to adduce evidence before the competent authority to establish the number of workers who are part of the Union and in any event if some persons are found to be not on the roll C.R.No.3563 of 2010 (O&M) -2- of the petitioner they would be excluded from the benefit of wages. Learned counsel for the petitioner further contends that the order is non-speaking. After perusal of the impugned order, I am of the opinion that no substantial injustice has been done on this account as the dispute pertains to the payment of wages which as observed earlier has to be established on the basis of independent evidence and merely because a person has been impleaded as a party does not obstruct the right of the petitioner. Dismissed. 25.5.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss