HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition fC)No. 656 of2009. PETITIONER : T.K. Tiwari, S/o Shri N.P. Tiwari, aged about 42 years, R/o Plot No. 68, Street No. C, Triveni Nagar (Smriti Nagar), Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS S^SK)NDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretar^', Home Department, DKS Building, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. State of CUiattisgarh .through Secretary, Revenue Department, DKS Building, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Smt. SujataHari, W/o Shri K. Hari, aged about 38 years. 4. Shri K. Hari, S/o not known, aged about 42 years. Both are residents of Street No. 11, Smriti Nagar, Bhilai, DistrictDurg, Chhattisgarh. 5. Tahsildar, Durg, Chhattisgarh. 6. Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, through its Commissioner, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 7. SuperintendentofPolice,Durg, Chhattisgarh. 8. Station House Qfficer, Police Station Supela, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 9. Shri Umesh Awasthi.ASsistant Sub Inspector of Police, Chowki Incharge, Smriti Nagar, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. CWKTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 QF THE CONSTETUTION OF BStDIA) , (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Sattsh K. Agmhotri, J.) Present : ShriP.S.KoshywithShriY.C.Shanna,Advocatesforthepetitionef. Shn A.S. Kachhwaha, Deputy Advtieate General forthe State. ORALORDER (Passed on 19th day of Februaiey, 2009) 1. With the consent ofthe parties, the matter is taken up fbr hearmg finally. ?»2. Leamed counsel appearing for the State, on mstructions given by the TalisiSdar who is present here, submits that fhe land in dispute is owned by the private person and the same is not a govenunent land, thus, the order dated 09.05.2008 (Aimexure P/9), passed by the Talisildar, Durg, is not proper and legal order. Appropriate steps would be taken to reeail the impugned order dated 09.05.2008. Shri A.K. Urao, Tahsildar, Durg, is present and undertakes that no constmction would be pennitted to be done on the disputed land till disposal of Revenue Case No. 8A-68/2007-08. He fiirfher undertakes that the saine shall be disposed ofwitimi a period offour weeks from the date ofreceipt ofa copv oftlus order. In view of the foregoing, according to leamed counsei appearing fbr petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication. Accordmgly, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto eosts. Consequently, pending applications, ifaiy, staiid disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge