IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2239 of 2008 MEENA DEVI WIFE OF LATE RAMJI LAL RESIDENT OF GARIKHANA HOSPITAL, ROAD BUXAR AT PRESENT BIR KUWAR SINGH COLONY, CHARITRABAN BUXAR, P.S. BUXAR, DISTRICT – BUXAR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BUXAR, P.S. BUXAR TOWN DISTRICT – BUXAR. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, BUXAR NAGAR PARISHAD, P.S. BUXAR TOWN, DISTRICT – BUXAR. 3. THE CHAIRMAN OF THE EXECUTIVE BOARD BUXAR NAGAR PARISHAD, P.S. BUXAR DISTRICT BUXAR. ----------- 02. 13.05.2010 Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a counter affidavit was filed on behalf of the respondent no. 4, however, the said counter affidavit was in respect of some other case. Inadvertently, the case number of the present writ application is mentioned in the counter affidavit on account of bona fide mistakes since the name of the petitioner was the same. On perusal of the said counter affidavit, it appears that the matter stated in the said counter affidavit is with respect to building construction of school and not with respect to the payment of retiral dues. Let this counter affidavit be returned back to the Mr. Mukund Mohan Jha, AC to SC –VII. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Nagar Parishad submits that the matter 2 is with regard to the payment of retiral dues as claimed by the petitioner. It is further submitted that the claim of the petitioner neither clearly mentioned in the writ application nor in the representation as contained in Annexure-2. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 2. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled at the earliest and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J)