In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 3388 of 2008 Date of Decision: 25.11.2008 Roop Chand Jain …Petitioner Versus Kuldeep Singh ... Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. I.D.Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Mr. Singla states that Roop Chand Jain, petitioner, had instituted a petition under Section 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973 on the ground of personal necessity. He has further stated that learned Appellate Authority had reversed the findings recorded by learned Rent Controller qua the ground of personal necessity. Mr. Singla further states that during the pendency of present revision petition, Roop Chand Jain has expired, therefore, plea of personal necessity has been rendered infructuous. Mr. Singla further states that the present revision petitoin be dismissed as infructuous with liberty to the successors of Roop Chand Jain to make out their claim of personal necessity, if any. As prayed, dismissed as infructuous with liberty as prayed for. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge November 25, 2008 “DK”