^ /oy^ S.B. (Service Matteri IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHAmSGARH) WRITPETITION (Sl N0. %£6?72010. PETITIONER: Kiunari Reve Rina Rai, daughter of Shri Mangalbadi Rai, aged about 47 years, working as Upper Division Teacher, Hostel Superintendent, at • Pre Matric Schedule Caste Girls Hostel, Pathariya, Tahsil Patharya, District BUaspur, Chhattisgarh. versus Respondents ^fe^ ^ ,^5^ ^"^€" >6^ \^ . .-If ^' ^" ^<6>" •&*••' 1 ?*^ ^—^'^/s 9 \%s~^^w \"'%-~?liti^- ./" 1. StateofChhattisgarh,Through Secretaiy, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K-S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, Chhatdsgarh. 3. Assistant Cominissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Bilaspiir, District Bilaspur, C.G. WRTT PETITION UNDBR ARTICLE 2260F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA "^. --:=" y ^- sii^i w ft-ii* S?I^T Sh*ii<t> ^e- TST •<<l<<ld<4, ®flly'i<o,fsidiyy,< C^t^.3^^^ sn^i-q^rC^q^tT; oB : Hon bie Shri nflanindra Mohah Shriyastava, 4 22-07-2010 Shri K.S. Pawar. counsel for U-ie petitioner. Shri Vinod Tekam, Panei La^yer for the State. i-ieara. f6i Learned counsei appearing is entitlecl to benent of two advani passed B.T.I. exarnination beforel submitteu that the issue invoived integra and uie sarne has been fins|i in the case of Asha Ssxena vs. State 59. it is further submitted that th order dated 06-02-2009 passed £..-t-t- .- ~ .-; counsei ror tne petitioner Turtner a 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeal juagment ot ine yupreme court in increments as per circuiar dated rraQesn, aner veriTicauun OT tne ractts Disaaeo in t'ne Dfiuuon. i*Wfi-l<i1-f IIHi'fl''? lyst ifSRSR ^?3iRlH 311^1 the petltioner submits that the petiuoner ;e increments on account of she havin! her appointment at her own cost. it is in the present petition Is no ionger res ilv decided bv the Hon ble Supreme Court or'm.P. & Ora.. 2009 (W MPJR ('SC) |s Court has also taken a similar view in its |in W.P.(S)No.6257 of -2008. Leamed taws attention of this Court to order dated |No.124 of 2008, wherein relylng upon the S:he case of Asha Saxena (supra) and the order passed by this Court in an^ither Writ Appeai No.87/2008, directions have been issued for conslderati^n of the case for grant of VMO advance 1 -09-1974 issued bv ths State of Madhva Learned counsei for the petitloner wouid aiso be considerecj respondents submits that case of the on ine sarne iines. RW, iri^~tprra—i-s147—2/2010—1,00,000. ,.?<yn41"a%,. ••i ^ ^^ —78 WW'IT (h*1|cd 'S^ -4i'4ici'Li, ynl^'is, ls«ni'y'j,< ..te^3..h^..:.3.^.6^.^ 311^1 TRq? (1°l{^«i<tT) S^V ^[ K.-tt'h WII 311^1 st)t|i+ <wiw ^ifei sn^i a.' ^--yi s.^ ~\ esponjjent in vie'w' of the statement nt off with a direction to the r ciairn of the petitioner for grant dated 21-09-1974 issued bythe 9 the facts pieaded in the petition w\ lade a'oove, this petition is finaily disposed authorities to consider and decide the |?f two advance increments as per cireuiar ^tate of Mad'nya Pradesh, after verification of ^hin a period of eight weeks from today. <*l<<td''il-l V^! if fs^Sl tfsR?R ^73TRlH3II^I Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge