IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI THURSDAY, THE 16TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 25TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 28128 of 2010(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- T.P.AHAMMED AGED 70 YEARS, S/O.LATE MOHAMMED T.P, THRIKKANNOOR PILLATHOTATHILL KUTTIYIL HOUSE CHENAKKALANGADI PO, THENHIPALAM VIA MALAPPURAM DISTRICT PIN 673 636 BY ADV. SRI.R.O.MUHAMED SHEMEEM SMT.NASEEHA BEEGUM P.S. SRI.P.Z.NIJAZ RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE THENHIPALAM POLICE STATION, THENHIPALAM MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE CENTRAL REGION, THRISSUR. 4. ABDUL JABBAR AGED 57 YEARS, S/O.AHAMED KUTTY MUSLIAR PARANTHODI, CHENAKKALANGADI,THENHIPALAM AMSOM DESOM,TIRURANGADI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 5. T.P.MUHAMMED @ CHINNAKUTTY HAJI S/O.IMBICHIKOYA, AGED 60 YEARS,MANGATTU HOUSE AREEPARA,CHENAKKALANGADI,THENHIPALAM AMSOM DESOM,TIRURANGADI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 6. P.K.FAISAL AGED 35 YEARS, S/O.K.T.MUHAMMED MASTER KURUKKANKANDATHIL HOUSE, CHENAKKALANGADI, THENHIPALAM AMSOM DESOM,TIRURANGADI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. WPC.NO.28128/2010 7. ANVAR T.P AGED 35 YEARS, S/O.LATE IMBICHIKOYA, THEKKORATH HOUSE,KOLATTADU, CHENAKKALANGADI,THENHIPALAM AMSOM DESOM, TIRURANGADI TALUK,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. GOVT. PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.28128 OF 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 16th day of September, 2010 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. Govt. Pleader appears for respondents 1 to 3. Notice to respondents 4 to 7 dispensed with preserving their right to seek review of the judgment, if aggrieved. 2. There appears to be some controversies in relation to the management of a unit of the Kerala Naduvathul Mujahideen . It appears that petitioner and the private respondents have controversies among them. However, it is submitted by learned Government Pleader that both parties bring in people from outside and the resultant situation had led to law and order situation. 3. Under such circumstances, we order that if any statutory proceedings are pending under the Code of Civil Procedure or the Police Act or any other relevant laws, the same shall be taken to its logical end in accordance with law without delay. We also direct the third respondent- I.G. of Police, Central Zone, to ensure through his WPC.No.28128/2010 2 subordinate persons that there is no adverse law and order situation created or prevailing in the area in question. Giving effect to the competing rights, parties have necessarily to seek relief from the civil courts, if any decree passed by those courts is not obeyed. Writ petition is ordered accordingly without expressing anything on the merits of the controversies between the petitioner and the private respondents. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN,JUDGE P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE sv. WPC.No.28128/2010 2