CWP No. 436/2006. 3.4.2008. Present: Mr. Rahul Mahana, Amic us Curiae, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. for respondent Nos. 1,4 and 7. Mr. C.N. Singh, counsel for respondent Nos. 3 and 6. Appearance has been put on behalf of the State of Haryana. An explanation has been given to the extent that due to certain misunderstanding, the Jail Superintendent had written to S.P. Fatehbad (Haryana) instead of S.P. Hisar (Haryana) for the protection to be given to the under trial who were required to be produced before the Sessions Judge Solan. The mistake has been rectified and on behalf of the State of Haryana, this court has been ensured that in future no such mistake will ever happen. We have been further assured that all the under trials would be produced on the date fixed before the court concerned. The response of the Police authorities of Punjab indicates that the under trials are now lodged at Amritsar Jail, therefore, it would be the duty of the Punjab Police authorities to ensure protection of the under trial before the court concerned. With these observations, the petition stands disposed of. (Jagdish Bhalla),C.J. 3rd April, 2008. (Dev Darshan Sud), J (cm)