1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO. 1660 OF 2004 Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, Latur. .. .. Appellant Versus Ganadhar S/o Narayan Jakkewad and others .. .. Respondent Shri S. S. Dande, Advocate for the Appellant. Shri G. G. Suryawanshi, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. Shri B. V. Wagh, A.G.P. for the Respondent No. 2 and 3. CORAM : N. D. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 24TH NOVEMBER, 2009. ORAL ORDER : 01. Heard Shri S. S. Dande, the learned counsel for the appellant and Shri G. G. Suryawanshi, the learned counsel for the respondent No. 1. The first appeal is arising out of payment of compensation to the other side and it is informed that, the dispute is settled between them amicably out side the Court. They have obtained writing from the respondent No. 1. It is also informed that, in the process of the order in view of compromise the order is passed in First Appeal No. 3305 of 2008 The Regional Officer, MIDC Latur Vs. Shivaji Ram Rathod. 2 02. The parties have every right to compromise their dispute in such matters of the civil nature, if it satisfy all such conditions of valid contract in Law. This Court is not interested to verify what agreement took place between the parties and now act upon the instructions given to the counsel who informed that, the dispute is settled. In that view of the matter, appeal stands disposed of with liberty to the parties to act upon the compromise between them, they got into writing. The appeal is disposed of. Appellant is entitled for refund of Court fees as per law. Liberty is given to the appellant to submit their compromise arrived at before the Reference Court or in any execution proceeding pending. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] bsb/Nov.09