1 Appln 53-2011 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.53 OF 2011 Bapu Parashram Thakre ..Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.P.L.Bhujbal, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs.A.A.Mane, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 24TH JANUARY, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant seeks anticipatory bail afresh on the ground of parity, since co- accused by name Rohidas Rajvanshi & Sau. Nirmalabai Rajvanshi have been admitted to anticipatory bail by Order dated 7th January, 2011. This order had already been passed when applicant's application for anticipatory bail 2 Appln 53-2011 was rejected on 11th January, 2011. All the same, I have gone through both the orders. While there was no allegation against them of participation in the attempt to murder one Santosh or in robbery, the allegation against the present applicant is that of robbing the first informant of a mobile phone and snatching a Golden chain, and against co- accused Abhijeet is that of assaulting on the head of Santosh. Therefore, there is no parity. 3. Criminal Application is rejected. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)