1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.264 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2234 OF 2008 Dr.Anjali C. Dhamangaonkar .... Petitioner Vs. The Municipal Corporation of .... Respondents Greater Mumbai & Ors. Mr.R.N. Bhagattjee, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr.K.K. Singhavi, Sr. Advocate i/by Ms.Shobha Ajeet Kumar for respondent nos.1 and 2. Mr.R.L. Nerlekar, Advocate for respondent no.4. Coram : J.N. PATEL & SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. Date : 10th September, 2009 P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This Chamber Summons is taken out by the petitioner to amend the petition and also to annexe certain documents on record. The respondents have no objection. Therefore, considering the affidavit-in-support of the Chamber Summons, it is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Necessary amendments to be carried out within one week. The amended copy of the petition to be placed on record and also to be served on other side. 3. Leave granted to the respondents to carry out consequential amendments by way of reply. The respondents to file their reply 2 within four weeks. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition be disposed of at the stage of admission, which according to Mr.K.K. Singhavi, Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent no. 1 and 2 submits that it will all depend on the matter when it is taken up for admission and in case it can be disposed of on merits at the stage of admission, the Court may do so. We do not find anyone can have objection in the matter. The Chamber Summons is disposed of. The Writ Petition to come up for admission on 8th October 2009. (Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota,J) (J.N. Patel, J.)