1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1577 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 1577 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 1577 OF 2008 Sanjeev Kumar & Ors. .. Petitioners. vs. Union of India & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr. G.K. Masant i/by Mr. Ajeet A. Manwani for Petitioners. Mr. P.M. Pradhan with K.R. Chaudhari for Respondent No.1. Mr. A.A. Kumbhakoni, AAG with Mr. V.S. Masurkar, GP., for Respondent Nos. 2 & 3. Mr. C.U. Singh, Sr, Adv, i/by S.V. Mame for Respondent no. 8. Mr. R.R. Shetty for Respondent nos.5 to 7 & 9. CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATE: 11TH MARCH, 2008. DATE: 11TH MARCH, 2008. DATE: 11TH MARCH, 2008. P.C. . The learned counsel for the respondents have drawn our attention to the fact that the petitioners have filed an application seeking review of the 2 impugned decision. The learned counsel for the petitioners says that he has pleaded so. Therefore, the petitioners having elected to seek review before CAT, we are unable to entertain this petition. In view of this, the learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the petition so as to enable them to pursue their review application before the CAT. Permitted to withdraw with liberty. Petition dismissed as withdrawn. We hope that the CAT would dispose of the review application as expeditiously as possible. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (Smt. Nishita Mhatre, J.) (Smt. Nishita Mhatre, J.) (Smt. Nishita Mhatre, J.)