IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 10158 of 2008. Decided on: 20.12.2010. Hem Raj. ……….Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal, Pradesh and others. ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners. : Mr. G.S.Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M.Negi, Deputy Advocate No. 1 and 2. General with Mr. J.S.Guleria, Assistant Advocate General. For the respondent No.3 to 5 : Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Mr. G.S.Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) December 20, 2010. Judge (krt) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.