IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20534 of 2010 RAM VINAY PANDEY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ---------- 06/ 09.12.2010 Heard. It is obvious from perusal of order dated 30.11.2010 that in the last paragraph of the aforesaid order name of petitioner has wrongly been typed as Ram Vijay Pandey in place of Ram Vinay Pandey @ Vinay Pandey. Similarly, Additional Sessions Judge II, Aurangabad has been typed in place of Additional Sessions Judge II, Gopalganj and furthermore, the word ach has been typed in place of each. Let name of petitioner Ram Vinay Pandey @ Vinay Pandey, in place of Ram Vijay Pandey, Additional Sessions Judge II, Gopalganj in place of Additional Sessions Judge II, Aurangabad and the word each in place of ach be read in order dated 30.11.2010. Let this order as well as order dated 30.11.2010 be communicated to the court of Additional Sessions Judge II, Gopalganj in Sessions Trial no.80/2010 arising out of Sidhwaliya P.S. Case No.14 of 2008 through FAX. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J))