IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 263 OF 2009 UDAY NACHINOLKAR ... Petitioner Versus SHRI. EKINDER R. PALIENKAR ALIAS EKINDER R. PALEKAR AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. A. D. Bhobe, Advocate for the Petitioner. Coram:- A.H.JOSHI, J. Date:- 12th August, 2009 1. Heard learned Advocate Mr. A. D. Bhobe for the Petitioner. 2. It is seen that there is a dispute as to area of suit survey numbers as recorded after new cadastral survey and land belonging to petitioner as seen after new cadastral survey. 3. It is seen that there was no dispute or controversy nor it is there any, as to respective possession and ownership vis-a-vis old survey numbers. 4. In the aforesaid background, learned appellate Court has granted in favour of plaintiff the order of injunction as regards ownership and possession admitted by the defendants and has described the property in the order of injunction by giving old survey numbers only. 5. Point urged in support of the present writ petition is that based on new cadastral survey numbers, and on the force of injunction impugned, the plaintiff may disturb defendant no.1's possession over land. 6. Nothing precludes the petitioner - defendant no.1 to protect his possession physically and by taking aid of law in such manner as he may be advised. 7. In these premises, no interference is called for, and petition is disposed of. A.H.JOSHI, J. at*