HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA UR w.P. (en) No. 5054/2011 Brcejesh Kumar Singh S/o Shn' Umakant Singh, aged about 42 years, R/o Vivekanand Nagar Nigan Colony, Near Maharana Pratap Chowk, Bilaspur, Police Station Civil Line, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.). PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. The Sub Divisional Magistrate Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.). 2‘ The Executive Magisuate § Cw Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.). 3. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department of Home and Police, Mantralaya, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.). 4. The State of C-hhattisgarh, Through The Stau‘on House Offlcer, Police Station Tarbahar, Bilaspur, Distt. BilaSpur (C.G.). 5. The Director General of Police, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.). 6. Smt, Saumya Chourisiya The Sub Divisional Magisuate Bilaspm‘, Distt, Bilaspur (C.Gr). 7. Shri Ashok Kumar Marbal, The Tahsildar, Takhatpur, Distt. " Bilaspur (C.G.). (The Ex—Tahsildar, Bilaspur (C.G.). Shri K.M.S. Khan, The Station-In- charge, Police Station Tarbahar, Bilaspur, Distt, Bilaspur (C.G.). H WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDXA. (SB :Hon’ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present-Shri Rishi Rahul Soni, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushil‘Dubey, G.A. for the State. ORDER (Passed on 02/09] 20 1 1) 1. By this petition under Article 226/ 227 of the Constitution of India petitioner has challenged the legality and propriety of the orders dated 14/4/2011 85 19/4/2011 and proceeding before the Sub Divisional-Magistrate, Bilaspur (C.G.) under Section 110 of the $9 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short ‘the Code’) pending befom it against petitioner in which pmliminaly order under Section 111 of the Code has been issued and order for interim bond under Section 116(3) of the Code has been passed in compliance of the said order petitioner has furnished interim bond on 19/6/2011 and petiu'oner has been released after furnishing interim bond, Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has challenged legality, propriety and arbitrariness of the order and action taken by the Sub Divisional Magistrate. Learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance in the matter of Mr. Nare'sh Kumar Jain and another v. State of U.P. and others reported in 1993 CR1. L.J. 1352 in which High Court of Allahabad has held that order passed in mechanical manner is bad in law in the proceeding initiated under Section 107/ 1 16 of the Code. All orders impugned are revisable and petitioner is having exhaustive remedy for challenging the same before the revisional Court, I do not fmd any ground for interference in exercise of supervisory writ jurisdiction. Consequently, petition is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. Sd/— T.P. Sharma Judge