1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.907 OF 1994 WRIT PETITION NO.907 OF 1994 WRIT PETITION NO.907 OF 1994 Vasant Akaram Patil & Ors. .. Petitioners. Vs. Devki Dinkarrao Patil & Anr. .. Respondents. None for the petitioners. Mr.S.D.Thokade i/b Mr.Sampatrao Pawar for respondent no.1. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 31ST AUGUST, 2005 DATED : 31ST AUGUST, 2005 DATED : 31ST AUGUST, 2005 P.C.: . The order impugned in the present writ petition was passed below Exhibit-90 in R.C.S. No.152 of 1990 by which the said application was rejected. The application-Exhibit-90 was filed by the petitioner for seeking police protection for the reasons stated therein. Similar prayer has been made in the instant writ petition. This court while issuing rule granted ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (c-1) which read thus: "(c-1) Pending the hearing and final disposal of this writ petition the Hon’ble Court be pleased to direct the trial Court to grant police assistance to the petitioner in form of prayer clause in application Exhibit-90". 2. It is clear that the purpose of the petition has been served by the interim order that 2 2 2 was passed on 1.3.1994 and that may be reason why none appears for the petitioners. It is clear that the writ petition has become infructuous and is dismissed as such. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)