IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH MAY 2011 / 4TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 13546 of 2011(P) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- MANAPPURAM JEWELERS PVT. LTD., VALAPAD P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY MR.JOSE, MANAGER, MANAPPURAM JEWELERS PVT.LTD., CHALAKKUDY SOUTH, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.RAFFEEKH.K RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. CHALAKKUDY MUNICIPALITY, (REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY) CHALAKKUDY, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680307. 2. THE SECRETARY, CHALAKKUDY MUNICIPALITY, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680307. BY ADV. SRI.M.P.ASHOKKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. ........................................... W.P.(C).NO.13546 OF 2011 ............................................. Dated this the 25th day of May, 2011. JUDGMENT Petitioner is a private limited company registered under the Companies Act engaged in jewellery business. Manager of the petitioner and landlord of the building wherein it is being run, were served with Ext.P1 notice under Section 406 (1) of Kerala Municipality Act, 1994. On receipt of Ext.P1 notice, the petitioner has submitted Ext.P2 explanation. Learned standing counsel for the respondent submitted that despite the receipt of Ext.P1 notice, the landlord did not respond to the same. Considering the facts that Manager of the petitioner company was served with Ext.P1 notice and he has responded to the same through Ext.P2 and also that the proceedings initiated as per Ext.P1 are still to be finalised, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to finalise the proceedings initiated as per Ext.P1, in accordance with law, taking into account the reply submitted by the petitioner in Ext.P2, expeditiously. C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE. cl : 2 :