IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN FRIDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2011/2ND POUSHA 1933 WPC.No. 30928 of 2011 (M) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- JYOTHI KRISHNAN R, PALERI HOUSE, MADAPPALLY COLLEGE P.O., VADAKARA - 673 102. BY ADV. SRI. C. BHASKARAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1 KERALA STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682 016 REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. BY SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR BY SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI BY SRI.P.BENNY THOMAS BY SRI.P.GOPINATH BY SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR, SC, K.S.W.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-12-2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DCS WPC.No. 30928 of 2011 (M) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS :- EXT.P-1 PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPLY LETTER DATED 27.6.2011 RECEIVED FROM THE INFORMATION OFFICER UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT. EXT.P-2 PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPLY LETTER DATED 01.08.2011 RECEIVED FROM THE INFORMATION OFFICER UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS :- NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE DCS K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J --------------------------------------------- W.P.(c)No.30928 of 2011 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of December 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner is a handicapped person. He had been appointed as a Class-IV employee on temporary basis by the respondent in the year 2007. According to him, he served in the Vadakara Ware House of the respondent Corporation from 13.2.2007 to 6.10.2010 without any break. He also received bonus three times. However, his services were terminated on 6.10.2010 without any reasons. The petitioner submits that he has a large family to look after. He, therefore, seeks the issue of appropriate directions for the grant of an appointment to him. 2. The counsel for the respondent Corporation submits that the petitioner was a temporary worker and he has been terminated. The requirement of his service was over. As per Ext.P1 letter, the petitioner has also been informed by the Corporation that this Court has directed the Corporation to make appointments only in WPC No.30928 of 2011 2 accordance with Sections 6 and 7 of the Staff Regulations applicable to the Corporation. 3. Since the petitioner was working only on temporary basis, I do not find anything wrong with his termination. I also notice that though the termination was in the year October 2010, this writ petition is filed only in November 2011. There are no acceptable reasons explaining the delay. I am not satisfied that the petitioner is entitled to any of the reliefs claimed in this writ petition. However, since the petitioner is a handicapped person, he may approach the respondent for an appointment as and when vacancies are available. 4. With the above observation, this writ petition is dismissed. sd/- K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE true copy P.A.TO JUDGE css/