IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 11312 of 2008 Decided on: 24.12.2010 Sarita Devi …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Anil Jaswal, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 3. None for respondent No. 4. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. A.K. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Consequently, the petition is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge December 24, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?