~S=e^ ^i-Micxi, yTRy'KS, ls|diy^< \..*^\ m.t-C.i^o. )32-/0^ -^ NWrtl **<!* •-••——••••-••—••••-••—• ^^200 1 sn^yr 'qaw (iy[^8i<ii») an^i^r R-fiih OTT3ITOI gRRT WIIW ^TfTO 3»1^T M.C.C. Mfo. 192/2006 AFPLICAKT Rame^u KT-unar Jam, aged about 50 years,|son ofLate Shri Hu-alal Jain, R/'o. F'ulga^n Naka, Durg, can^'ing on busin^ss in the nanie & stvle of "R.K. Traas^ort Coinpany" as Sole Proprietor Fersus RESPONDBNT M/'s. tpharat Alumiuium Coin.pany Ltd. A Compsjny, fbrough its President, AluTnir|iuni Bhawan, Korba, Distt. Korba (C.G.) 12-4-2007 Shri Anand Tiwari, Advo^ Shri Abhisek Smha, Adv( Heara. AppUcaat has preferred of Arbitration and Conciliatibn Arbitra.tor. I Uase ot ttie appucaat is 6-12-1999 was eatered intol applicaut tor a penoa ot iq extended tiU 31"- March, 2^) eutered into between fhe pj transportation of Bauxite fix>iB| BALCO, Distt. Korba. The peijiod wifh efFect from 31st march, 2f towanis the work performed bf tiie appucaut despite severap CM<LiT(n<^i *iH(rffTf1^(<rl<r^^« ^siRpTsii^r :ate for the applicant. )cate for the non-appUcaut. |tfiis appucation uiicter yecUon 11(bj Act, 1996 for appomtment of that an arbitration agreeinent dated between the applicant aad non- inonths which was subsequenftir )02. The contract agreeinent was arties for the work of miniag aad Menpat Mines to AlurniTiiuin Piant, of contract has come to an end 302, however fuU and fiaal payment the applicant has not been made to applications for the saine. The GRPRJ— FS/246—2/2007 — 50'.UUO. I-HC—78 sn^i^il^nai? gsnsn^iWRW 3^r^nv^f, wSws, ^wy. '<,»,- n.L-G'^O. 192-/06 SCT^T Tiaw ( TRiiwaftgsnta «b!<tf<rf4-<'Wraf ^^S <t"l't^l< ^siRnan^T appUcaitt vide his letter particular dispute and {: arbltrator as per CIaus^ Amiexure A-l. Mowever, Aiuiexure A-3 datea 2U-y-(. appoint ffae arbitrator as r^ representative of fhe Onlv on failure of fhe disd' Arbitrator was to be considi Leamed counsel foi| aon-applicaat was cluty of thc dispute regardiag inade by the applicaat foi^ lias taUed to appouit one inontli, a case tor appi ofthe Arbitration and Cons. On the other hand, upon Annexure A-3 and o: applicaat in fhe petition. Uiere is aa agreeinent arbitration cteuse No. 9 arisen between fhe partiei uie appUcaat requestuig dbted ap^Iicaat bclunct arbittator 22-8-2005 (Aanexure A-2) raised a •aUed upon non-applicant to appoiut 9 of the Arbitration Agreeinent of the non-applicaat vide their reply of i005 rcjected the prayer and refused to :quested and instead, invited authorized for discussions and settteiiient. ussions, tas request tbr appointment ot lerea. fhe applicaat subiiiits that since the to appoiut arbitrator for setflenient |he arbitration agreement after request the same and since the non-appUcant iu tenns of the agreeinent within >uitment of Arbitrator uuder Section 11 liliation Act, 1996 is made out. tearaed counsel for flie appUcaut reUes jaUy disputed the clauns raised by the ^Iowever it has not been disputed that (etween the parties which stipulates ia pursuance thereof, a dispute has aad despite service of notice inade by ^he noa-applicaat for appoiatinent qf add ^^,7—t1V-t;Sd' .„„„•»;--t.uyu"\ rad>i° OVU us XI-HC—78 .3Ti^I?Rl1^;IR? •;'«nsii^i wqw -S^Sf -^W^, t$Ti1'y'l(o, (s|i7>K-l^ ^.C-^'^6. f^S-/0(& sni?r''raw (4c*!l'!<'i?) •S^IIWdfeT STI^T «iii<ifci41-i^nsft' •if.fe^ <fa<<i< i; aifgi} 3Ili% Arbitrator, appouitment stipulated period. I have heard leamedl fh.e record iacluding me Ai? my considered opinion, a| made out. Leamecl couasel ton objection if Hon'ble Sbri J4 Court of Madhva Pradesh the present case. Therefore, t hereby, Hon'ble Shri dustice S.C. Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpi The Hon'ble Arbitratil and rem.uiieration. Registry to intiniate Judge of H^h Court of M.: Arbitrator and to send aU parties. Parties are also dire S.C. Paadey, who is presei Gua Carriage Factory, subinit papers aud to take M.C.C, is accordiagly ofjArbitrator could not be inade wittun the counsel for fhe parties, 1 have perused bitration Agreeinent ot Aitnexure A-l. In case for appoiattaent of Arbitrator is the parties subnut that fhey have no [stice S.C. Paadey, formerJudge ofHigh [t Jabalpur is appointed as AAitrator ia ^dfh the consent of the parties, appoint 'andey, former Judge of High Court of (ir, subject to tus consent. >r may setfie his terms aad conditions Honlle ShriJustice S.C. Pandey, fonner jp., Jabalpur, about his appointmeut as the papers along with address of the ;ted to approach Hon'bte Shri Justice ^tly icsiduig at South Civil Lines, Near Ch|ungi Chowki, Jabalpur (M.P.) and to ^art in arbitration proceediitgs. Idisposed of. -—-—^-^,—~ Dhirendra Mishra Judge