IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARILAL FRIDAY, THE 9TH DECEMBER 2011 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 29891 of 2011(J) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------------- 1. BABY, S/O.DAVEED, CHOORAPPADI HOUSE, ASARIKKAD,VELLACHAL, PEECHI VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT 2. MANI K.R, S/O.RAGHAVAN, KUNNATHUVALAPPIL (H), ASARIKADU DESOM, PEECHI VILLAGE, THRISSUR BY ADV. SRI.K.I.SAGEER RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR-680001. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PEECHI VILLEGE, PEECHI, THRISSUR-680001. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PEECHI POLICE STATION, PEECHI-680001. 4. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THRISSUR-680001. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER, M.K.ABOOBACKER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 29891 of 2011(J) APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DT.K.DIS 15640/11/D1 DT.16-09-2011 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P2 : A TRUE COPY OF THE GO(M8) NO.85/2010/ IND DT.5-4-2010 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT EXT.P3 : A TRUE COPY OF THE INJUNCTION ORDER DT.26-09-2011 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P4 : A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN 19-10-2011 IN WP(C) NO.26282/2011 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. EXT.P5 : A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DT.26-09-2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS :NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & K.HARILAL, JJ. ------------------------------------------------- W.P.(c) No.29891 of 2011 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,J It is submitted by the learned Senior Government Pleader that the vehicle in question had been released to the petitioners and also that the issue is being enquired into by the Revenue Divisional Officer. Even though Sri.K.I.Sageer Ibrahim learned counsel for the petitioners sought for time, we are not inclined to grant time. We close the writ petition giving liberty to the petitioners to move again, if they are aggrieved by the final decision taken by the Revenue Divisional Officer. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE K. HARILAL, JUDGE ln