MC 1659/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Mr. NC Das, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. M Devi, Advocate for the appli cant and Mr. P Bhagawati, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 (since de ceased) and opposite party No. 4. None appears for the opposite party No. 1 The instant application discloses that during the pendency of the MC No. 254/201 0 filed by the applicants seeking certain clarifications in the judgment and dec ree dated 19.12.2006 passed by this Court in RSA No. 18/2001, the respondent No. 2 (respondent No. 2 herein) and respondent No. 3 had expired in July, 2010 and 16.07.2009 respectively. According to the applicant, the information about the demise of the aforenamed r espondents was available to him only on 13.09.2010 and, thereafter, inspite of h is best endeavours, the names and particulars of the heirs and legal representat ives of the aforenamed deceased respondents could not be ascertained. By the ins tant application, the names and particulars of the heirs and legal representativ es of the deceased respondent Nos. 2 (opposite party No.2 herein) & 3 (opposite party No. 3 herein) have been set out in paragraph 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties present and on a consideration of the averments made in the application, the prayer for substitution of the he irs and legal representatives of the deceased respondent No. 2 & 3 is allowed. The office would make necessary corrections in the cause title of MC No. 254/201 0. The miscellaneous application stands allowed.