.f^19^.. §A..^: ^K'^'. s J S V^€^ ^<'" fc' XS'Tr^'ET r^if^i'rOT'r-fe-S? ^~iXTi^.4,'T"?T?^^ 4T?T^ <&T-^-iX AGii'TTX? E~B..s^,-r.S~S. ^.,.^,^S..i.N;'§. S y.e^ ^....'.^.^a.^ j 3 s i^STr^..Ka7E. -^. g .I^X1.^A:.:"^?.''^..?^.. 'SI'S.T-.CA "Ell ^.-t5-L* . ^^ f£^\ ~R-'r . -^ '?'° ^ ^ A*' '^*n;oeB ?fA-ia. A'^t-itt-SUXX t^s 1^0, A^<J?£t OX.A^tFO sTiBF.BS : 1. Bati<hilal PateL ase.fi about 44 v?ars_ ao'i of Slwi Niranfan Prasad Patel, .A-ssistant Teaeher, Govennnent Primai'y Schoo! Pstrapati, P-/o ^^illage- and Po<?t Ciiirr^; ^^ia Bliaisi'ii^-; Tah. Ana Distt. Koroa (CG) (Appomteu on 06.02.1990) 2. P-ohit Kumar Lader- a^ed about 44 ve-ars. son of Sliri Kiioob Das L-adre; Assisiaat Teacher, Goveniment Frimary School Risdi- Vikas IQ'a.iid and Distt. Korba VJo Viliaee aiid Post Risdi, Via Rajgamar, Distt?'Korba (CO) (Appointed on 13.01.19R7'). 3. Smt. Laresiya Pamia, aged about 42 ycars, son of Slu'i Abhay Kishore Pao".a, Assistant Teacher Goveniment Ivliddle School Risdi, Distt. Korba (CG) (Appointed on 25.03.1989). tlTSPONnVNTS WRSUS Sttite of Cbhattisgarh Tliroiigh Secreitary, Departxii.eiit of ischool r,ducauon .uau 's.aiyan singii rihawan; Kaipur ^u-j. The Distfict Ediication Ofiicer, Di^trict ICorba (CO). ?TTTmMTThjnFT? ^??TfPT? •7'?^ OP TT-TF PHM^TTTT mQM P?F TNJHT A "^ .i .i\./'i'v u!'tii./r.,r\. /T^,.I .ii../j..^.r. ^zo ^^i* i nn, ^,<.^;"M^ l.t E U i ii./.iN i.JT l.l-^i ^l^-t.S (SB: ffor hif Mr, Satish K, Asiiliotri, •J-) Fresenl. : SI^ri AiT^it Kuniar Shanii^ Advoc^te1 fof the netitioners. Shri Vinay Harit, Deputy Advocate Generai for tne State/resDondeutg. ^o& -^fy £f~oi ~si •uary,2098) 1, The petitioners ^vc-re iiiitially appointe^l as Assistant Teaehers oo flxed r?av of P^s. 300/~. Aiter comrtietion of Drob^tion. th? Detitioiiers were granted regiilar pay scale. n- Similarlv sitiiated cmDlove^s had aDoroached the Madhva Pradesh State Admiiiistrative Tribunal. Jabaluiir. The Tribijnal uassed th§ ordiSf on 24.08.1992 rn O.A. No. 2745,'t?9 <"Madh"kant Yad" and 56 othere \Ts. State ofM.P. & Others.V 3. !t wag fij.rther hcld that tlie said benefit ^vould be ^iven to all the teachers 9.iid tbev gho'jld not be eomDeIled to aoDro^-ch the Tfibunal fbr siniilar benefit iiidividuallv or co!lective!v. 4. Being aggTieved, the tlien State ofMadhya Pradesh had filed tlie Special Leavc Petition (Civil) No. 6S92/93 impiigiiiiig the order dated 24.08.1992 passed by the Madhya Pradegh .A_dniinistrative Tribunal, Jaba!our in O.A. No. 2745/89. The Hon'ble Suoreme Ciwrt after hcarmg tBSSSa, 8 <8 S ^ •i^. ^ '•^ v^^^i" •^-^•a.^.--5 agf ^'y^sB?7-'• counsel for the parties, dismissed the Specia! Leave Pet«ticMi and having regard to the large financial implications, granted one year's time to settle the claim for the arrears withoirt iiiterest vide order dated 03.01.1994. If was fiirther observed that the mtervention would work out their rights in accordance with law. This order dated 24.08.1992 passed by Ifae Tribunal in O.A- No. 2745/1989 is applicable to the petitioners being similarly sitiiated and they are accordmgly entitled to the game benefit. 5. Lcamed coiuisel appearing for the petitioners submits tlut this Court while considering the same isaie in Rani Kumar Sahij and others Vs. State Govt. ofChhattisgarh and another in Writ P<?tition (8) No. 813 of 2007 by order dated 12 02.2007, has granted regijlar pay scale w.e.f. the date of'nitia! appointnient- 6. Leamed coiinsel appearing for the parties jointly siibmit that this case is squarely covered by the decision ofthis Court in the case ofRain Kumar Sahu and others Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and another (Supra). However, the state is at Uberty to verify the facts of appowtmeat asto whether the case ofthe petitioners are similar to that ofthe order dated 12.02.2007 passed bythis court in W.P. (S) No. 813 of2007 (Siipra). 7- In view ofthat tliis petrtion is allowed in the same temis i.e. petitionere are entitled to the same relief as was yanted by the Madhya Pradesh State Admmistrative TnT^unal, Jabalpjr in O.A_ No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadii and 56 others Vs State of M.P A others) and subsequently confirmed by order dated 03.01.94 passed bythe HonWe Supreme Court iii Specia! Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93. The petitioners shall be govemed by the orders passed by the Tribunal as well as by the Hon'ble Supreme Conrt (supra) accordingly, subject to verification ofthe facts. No order asto costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Sahn