1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.__________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. WRIT PETITION NO.2503 of 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar/s orders | and Registrar’s orders | CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 18TH JUNE, 2010 1. The present petitioner challenges the order dated 30th October, 2009, passed by the Principal District Judge, Aurangabad, thereby rejecting the application filed by the present petitioner for condonation of delay in filing the application under Section 32. 2. The learned District Judge has found that in view of the statutory bar, as prescribed under sub-section (3) of Section 34, the court is permitted only to condone the delay of 30 days after the prescribed limitation of 3 months. 3. No perversity could be found with the approach adopted so as to warrant interference under Article 227 of the Constitution. Hence, the writ petition is rejected. (B.R.GAVAI,J.) grt / office /wp 2