-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO.3455 OF 2005 Shrimant Chintamanrao @ Chimanrao Sadashivrao Pantsachiv & Ors Petitioners Vs Ravindra Anantrao Pantsachiv and ors. .. Respondents Mr R.S.Shekhawat, i/b Mr L.M.Acharrya, for the petitioners. Mr Sahasrabudhe i/b Mr G.S.Godbole, for the respondents. CORAL : D.B.BOSSES,J. CORAL : D.B.BOSSES,J. CORAL : D.B.BOSSES,J. DATE : 03.10.2006 DATE : 03.10.2006 DATE : 03.10.2006 PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioners have taken exception to the two orders, both dated 4.4.2005 by which the respondents-plaintiffs’ application seeking amendment of the plaint has been allowed. I perused the application as also the orders. By the application for amendment, the petitioners sought to add some more properties being properties of the joint family in the suit. This is a suit for partition. I perused the orders. In my opinion, the court below has rightly allowed the applications for the reasons stated in the orders. I see no infirmity in the impugned orders warranting interference by this court under Article 227 of the -2- Constitution of India. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. . Needless to express that the petitioners- defendants shall have a liberty to file additional written statement, if they so desire, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of this order. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)