IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No.795%0f2o11 PETITIONER Bharosa Sahu, aged about 58 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School Dhaneli, Block Gurur, Dist— Durg (C.G.) ohan Ram Sahu S/o Shri Ram VERSUS £5: RESPONDE : 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, l\ \M through the Secretary, School Education Department, \\ .Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhavvan, Raipur (C G ) 2. The Commissioner, Public Instructions, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The District Education Officer, District — Durg, (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA amamfm? WW’W SB : Hon‘bie Shri Manindra Mailan Shrivastava: J. eg-1 2-2011 Shri S.K.Thomas, counsei for fhe petitioner. $hri Chandresh Shrivastav a, Pane! Lawyer for the State on advance copy. With the consent of learned counsei for the parties. the matter is heard fmaiiy. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue invoived 7\ I in the case is as to whether, the petitioner is entitled to reguiar pay scaie with effect from the date of initial appointment or after completion of probation period. The issue involved herei ‘was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpu in O.A.No.2745i89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others v. , State of MP. & othe j, wherein, it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regula pay scale with effect from the date of initial appointment. It is not disputed by both the parties that the matter was taken up by the State to the Apex Court but th appeal was also dismissed by the Apex Court upholding the decision of the T bunal to the effect that the teachers I Assistant Teachers are entitied for reg lar pay scale from the date of their initiai appointment. Accordingly, the petitione is granted liberty to make representation raising of the aforesaid judgment and order dated all his grievances, in the lig 05i0’ii201 1, and in turn, the con erned respondent is directed to consider the case on its own merits and its perspe tlve. if the petitioner stands on the same footing as per order passed by the S te Administrative Tribunal in Madhukant Yadu (Supra) and subsequentiy con rmed by the Supreme Court in Special Leave a ii i‘! tirae‘ta time garment, nirvrial’immiis/‘i wed/201 1—1 ,So,ooo. -i. n wy»@9m:*"§§l/;Oo mm mmwafia?!) am‘arnfiam mm I mmm ~2_ ' ww$W$ff§m . . ’ Petition (Civ‘ii) No.6892/93 by order dated 03/01f95, the petitioner may be entitied tosa'me relief accordingiy. i- ~ it is expected from the State authorities to pass suimbie order after due scrutiny of the facts. in viewfof foregoing, this petition is nnaiiy disposed off. 4.. . Sd/- 'eM’anindra Mohan Shrivastava L "t J Deepii i, i . I, I L I r ’ Judge i i .; i i i. i I g i it, Wei“ ”We EWW, Wmiiamisx: 40—~-2/2m iwigomo.