l o Village Panchayat Sakholi Pclme station - Darlma Tah. Amblkapur, Distt surguJa(CG) 7. Mehendra prasad Kushwaha aged about 48 years resident of village Sakholi Village Panchayat Sakholi P S Darlma, Tah Amblkapur Diett Surguja E‘IRI‘l‘W PETETION UNDER ARTICLES .__.__z_,. 226 227 OF CON$TIIUWIGN wag ( EARTICULARS OF Tl-IE PETITIEONER z mrlt Petition Ne 3 2A ox 2003 / Shiv Kumar Dubey, son cf. hri Tirath Erasad Dubey, aged about 3o years, resldant ef Village Amblkapur Disttg ~~surgtija (C;G.); %akrmll P S Darnna Tahsui- Vspsus * state “of. Cbhat t isgarh Thro‘ugh V~ The secretary, Panchayat & Rural Develomment ’ Department D K 3 Bhawan Rainur 2. The Directcr, Panchayat & Rural Development Department Ralpur ((2.6 ) 3. The Commissioner, BilaSpur "Divisiont Bilaspur (CG) 4. The Cellector, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.). 5. The Ch1e£ Executive officer Janped Panchayat Amblkapur .1 Distt. SurguJa (C G ). ‘ 6. The $arpanch (C G )‘ / As nenticneé amVe in the cause title. ....contd.... pETIgmNER RE$PQNDENTS .LN IHE zIIG CUUxT Or CdtIATTISGAR -_-~.—__-.-.~-.—_~.-‘—--’ —_—...u..-....mww....‘ S / _ 12. 11.2003 Petitioner by Shri V. K. Pandey, Advocate. Shri Ranbir Singh, Govt. Advocate takes notice on behalf of the Rcspondcnts No. 1, 2 and 4. Heard. The petition of the peti‘ioner is that he was appointed as Panchayat Karmi at village Sakholi on 2.10.1996 and after his appointment he Was performing his duties with all sincerity and devotion. However, a false complaint was made against the petitioner by some members of the village Panchayat and based on that complaint without g any opportunity of hearing the Respondent No.4 Collector a terminated the servicdof th petitioner mm the post o Panchayat Karmi vide order dt. 22102002. Before passing impugned order the Collector has hot given any' opportunity of aring to the petitioner to defend his case and thereby the princ ples of natural justice have been violated. The petitioner med an appeal against the ordef dt. 22.10.2002 before the C ‘ hearing the petitioner the C p termination order passed by Collector. A copy of the stay order passed by the Commissioner t. 18. 11.2002 is Annexure P/2. After obtaining the stay order the p 'tioner moved before the Respondent No.4 Collector for allowing to join his duties but in utter violation of the order passed No.4 had not allowed the sioner stayednthe operation of the the Commissioner the Respondent n'tioner to join his duties. In the i‘ S j e e o o ‘s e y e :rG/oj) mm ‘gi 200 m WWW: ,Lo,p.w 3\ WW WW aiamanéw I be may be allowed to make a detailed representation for which learned Govt. Advocate has no objecn'on. regardbg‘the facts and circur allowed to make a detailed re] raising all his grievances withi 3O days from the date of recei} manner considering all the gri reasoned order. ans this petition is disposed of dually. wd copy of this Order‘ meanh'me the post of the Commissioner has been abolished. The petitioner made several representations to the Secretary, Govt. of Chhattisgarh and Director, Panchayat but so far they have not decided his repnesentation. £a1ned counsel for the petitioner further submits that Respondents No. 1 and 2 may be directed to decide the representau‘on and With the above observau’ Parties are entitled for cc Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having istances of the case the petitioner is )resentation to the Respondent No.1 r1 a period of 10 days nom today and the Respondent No.1 will decide the representation within another .t of the representation in an objective :vances of the petitioner by passing a i * Sd/- L L.C.BHADOO no i t Judge [111%W