IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER SB Cr Misc Fourth Bail Application No. 10407/2010 Mukesh Choudhary Vs State of Rajasthan 18.12.2010 HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Rajesh Sharma - for the petitioner Mr NR Saran, PP – for the State BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while third bail application was dismissed a direction was given to expedite the trial, however, trial has not been completed as yet. Out of total witnesses only 37 have been examined leaving 9. Thus petitioner may be granted bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. After taking into consideration rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect the outcome of the trial, but looking to the facts of this case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Hence, fourth bail application is dismissed. Trial court is directed to see that remaining witnesses are examined at the earliest and all efforts may be made to cause their appearance so that trial is completed soon more so when petitioner is behind bars for the last more than two and half years. (MN Bhandari), J. bnsharma