IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.11285 of 2008 Decided on: 21.2.2011. Lalit Kumar Sharma ……….Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant AdvocateGeneral, with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Petitioner has approached this Court seeking regularization after completion of 10 years uninterrupted service. Mr. Naresh Kaul, learned Counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of the Court to Annexure R-IV. A bare perusal of Annexure R-IV reveals that the petitioner had completed 10 years uninterrupted service w.e.f. 1994 with 240 days in each calender year. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization, as per Annexure R-IV, within a period of eight weeks after the date of production of copy of this judgment by the petitioner. The petitioner shall be entitled to all the consequential benefits. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma Judge February 21, 2011. (hl) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.