IN THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM ORDER, SHEET ' Writ Petition (a) and Another. 1.1 -6-200 .No. ±S of3!£3c 2003. ..S.i*klm„€.itiz.ens.'...F.a.rum.....Petitioner/Appellant Versus State of Sikkim and ors. I:...T...It'.I.I.:..........Respondent e f e petitioner T.Jo.1\dvocateGi-neral .a. Pradhan-. Gc>vt State .lyangdi Phunpc>, Lzens' Fc)r`rm 5. I,Tpon heari.r`g ie that this Cour ie learned Advoca lies and service o_fficers andLedtonorrow ln iary orders. co-pies of the lit petition to vt . .Advocate ^aHriin€h ) ef Justice. 2003 . Order with Signature Present: Maj. T.W. Phirnpo. in person, - Mr. a.P. Warigdi. assisted by ]tr. Advocate f or the I{eard Maj. rr`ashi W the President of Stkkim Citi representing the petl€ionf:rs Maj. Phuhpo, it-appears to-I require the asslsta.r`ce of th General pertaining to the ru condltionB of t.he Direct.or, employees c)£ l`J.I.T. The matter be list the rnotii.n column for necess Mr. Phunpo shall supply the documents appended to the wr ur. T.B. Pradhan, learned .Go during the course of the day Acting ch 19-6 =i= Office Note as to taaf:Lo3n(i3:a:I Serial No. of Order 2.2 -6-200 I Order with Signature Preserit.: Mai.. T.W. Phunpo. petitioner No.1 in person. Mr. S.P. T,.aangdi. Advocate General assisted by Mi-. J.a. Pradhan, Gout. Advocate for the State. This Court received the good assist from Mr. S.P.1-iangdl. `iearne¢ 7`dvocate Genera ¢ J ®J 0 , in terms of the ctrder dated 1916-?.003 pat-sad by this Cc>urt in this case in as riuch a8 he produced and placc3d a copy of the Charter c)f Incorporation of the Si'ckim Research lnstitut of Tibetology before this Court today and highlighted about the.powers, managener`t. objects and functions of the Institute. I have perused it. I ar c>f'the view that this doc.uv`ent has highlighted a lot of things wl}ic Court could not see yesterday upon hetlring LElt. F- .i, .E= Office Note as to action (if any) taken on Order nce Order with signatu,re . Office Note as to t:itc£:no(n[foar%)I I it should not be passed. `Jotiae ±s unade returnarle by 4-7-2003 for which the petiti ls required to take Steps .fc>r service of no upon the respondents within three days. Th copy of the Certlf icate of Incorporation of Narngyal Institute eof Tlbetiolc)gy of Garigtok furnished by the learne(3 Achrocate General i hereby foraged part of the .record and the same is niarked as 'X' for identif iGatlc)n. The flat.ter be listed on 4-7-2003 fo necessary orders. ul. th' GLJJ (tJ. Act 0-.6-2003. 3L*- 4.7 ATI Present I Hr. T. W. Phinpo. petitioner No in person. Mr. S. P. Wangdi. Advocate Gene assisted by «r.t d.-8®. Pradhan. Go`rt.Advoc!ate I or the State-res N®s. 2 and 3. .` Mr. a. R. Pradhan. J\dvocate for respondent Nos.1.4C.5.6 and 7. Major T. W. Phunpo. the petitioner No.2 is pEesent. Mr. S. P. Wangdi, learned Advocate General assisted by Mr. a. a. Prad learned Government. Adi/ocate entered appearan on bchalf of the State-respondent Nos.2 and lulr. a. R. Pradhan. learned Counsel ent.ered appearance on behalf of respondent Nc>s.1.4.5 6 and 7. and the respondent Nos.1.4.5.6 and 7 have filed counter-affidavit. The matter be listed for admission on 16.7.2003. Acting Chief Justice 4 .7 ,2 003 . -_-I Serial No. 6f Order •7 .200i Presentcation ground 6£ffigg:¥:tifs#d, A:r order .with` Sig9att#r? : Maj.T. W. PhunpQ. pet.itioner ln person. Mr. S. P. Wangdi. Advocate assisted by Mr. a. a. Pradhan, Govt.Advocat,e and Mr. Karma Thi Asst,t.Covt.A,dvocate for the respofrden£ Nog. 2 and 3. Mr. 8. R. Pradhan, Advocate for respondent Nos.1, 4, 5. 6 & 7. The petitioner No.2 filed an appli- for adjcurrment of this qase on the that he needs the assistance of a lawyer who can represent him for his case. Heard Mr. S. P. Wangdi. learned Advocate General assisted by Mr. .. a. Prad Covt.Advocate and Mr; `Xarma. `Thinlay, Assis Govt.Advocate for State-respondent Nos.2 an 3 and also ur. a. R. Pradhan.°learned Calms for respondent Nos.1. C4. 5. 6 and. 7.a Keeping in view the. appllcatlon for grant of adjournment... tt`e matter be listed cC|® on 14th August. 2003 £o-r ~necessqry orderg. 16.7.2003 a Order with Sigapture 5. 4.8.ZOO Heard Mr. T. W. Phunpo, writ petitioner No.2 who is also representing the petitioner No.1. Heard also Mr. S. P. Wangdi, leaned Advocate Cieneral assisted by Mr. J. 8. Pradhan, learned Govt.Advocate and Mr. Karma Thinlay, learned Assistant Govt.Advocate for State - respondents 2 and 3 and Mr. 8. R. Pradhan, 1eamed Counsel for respondents 1,4,5,6 and 7. The petitioners filed an application for allowing them to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the Government of Sikkim for settlement of their grievances. I have perused the application dated 13.08.2003. Considering the :last:::se°df,t::thc]:::;tS&:a:j|¥;i:Sfth¥hnetG:;:1:°:e:: of Sikkim/respondents concerned, if so advised. No order as to costs. 14.08.2008 Office Note as to taackt::noLif6:g!r