HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.466 of 2011 ORDER: The only grievance of the petitioners is that they are third parties to the suit in O.S. No.138 of 2009, which was filed by the respondent No.1 against respondent No.2 for recovery of money on the basis of a pro-note. During the pendency of the Suit, attachment before judgment was ordered in I.A. No. 653 of 2009 and the same was also made absolute and subsequently the Suit was decreed ex-parte on 19.7.2009. According to the petitioners, their property of 0.26 ½ cents was also included in the property, which was attached by the Court below. They came to know about the same only when they wanted to mortgage the property to the bank for the purpose of taking a loan. Therefore, they filed I.A. No. 98 of 2011. Petitioners complain that neither the I.A. was disposed of by the Court below nor the attachment was raised. Hence, they filed the present revision. Under those circumstances, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of directing the Court below to consider and dispose of I.A No. 98 of 2011 purported to be pending on its file, and pass appropriate orders as per law, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Court below may also take into consideration any bank guarantee that may be offered by the petitioners as security for the suit amount against 0.26½ cents of land and may consider raising of attachment to the extent of 0.26 ½ cents of land only, after evidence is let in and after deciding the title etc. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ________________ C.V. RAMULU,J DATE: 15th February, 2011 Note: Furnish c.c. in four days. B/o pnb