1 3326.11 SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3326 OF 2011 Shri.Sunil Maruti Rasal & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Shrikant Yadav for Petitioners. Mr.Prashant Chavan i/b Little & Co. for Respondent No.2. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND R.Y.GANOO, JJ. DATED:- JUNE 9, 2011. P.C. 1. Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner Nos.1, 3 and 4 do not wish to pursue this Petition in view of the position recorded in order dated 5th May, 2011. Insofar as petitioner No.2 is concerned, she has secured more than the cut-off marks provided for the concerned category. The Counsel appearing for the respondent No.2 accepts this position, which has also been stated on affidavit filed by respondent No.2. Thus, nothing survives for consideration even insofar as petitioner No.2 is concerned. The Petition is accordingly disposed of. (R.Y.GANOO, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)