IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP (T) 13786 of 2008. Date of decision: 21.3.2011 Bal Krishan Sharma … Petitioner. Versus State of HP. …Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. K.C. Sankhyan, Advocate vice Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Vivek Singh Thakur, Addl. AG with Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Dy. AG. Deepak Gupta, J. (oral) 1. This petition has become infructuous because the only relief claimed in this petition is that the order of suspension of the petitioner be set aside. The petitioner has already retired from service, and therefore nothing survives in the petition. I have been informed at the bar that the petitioner has been acquitted, but it has not been ascertained whether any appeal has been filed or not. In case, the petitioner has any grievance, he is at liberty to file fresh petition in accordance with law. No costs. ( Deepak Gupta ) Judge. 21st March, 2011. (Krn guleria) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes.