IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.5759 of 2007(O&M) Date of decision: January 22, 2009 Ram Jas ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. Subhash Ahuja, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner has cut short the entire controversy. He has stated that admittedly a post of Peon is still lying vacant in the office of the respondent No.3 and thus the petitioner could very easily be accommodated even without uprooting the respondent No.5. In these circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to consider the feasibility of posting the petitioner to the said vacant post sympathetically and pass the necessary order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. January 22, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE