^ <i u ^' JM THE HIGH COORT OF MADHYA PBADESH : JABALPUB ^rit Petitio^ £to», C3q ,_A996 '!. -^. ;. ^ -1;- PgTITIQIER RESPOKDEgl'S Sukharo bai Nag wif©of Namiaylal Nag aged 4©years,'Working as Sarpanch, oT Gram I>anchayat, Singhanpur" BLock'Keshkal.'Distt Basta'r (M.P,) Versvs l, Sub-Oivisional Officer (Bevenue) Keshkal, ©istrictBastar (M»P») 2,Tahsildar, Keshkal Distt Bastar (M,P<) •3^ Somaru Ram,'l^> Sarpanch, Gram Pancfa- j rat Singhahpu]? Blo^k Keshkal, ! [stt Bastar (M.P<) 4. Gangoram, Panch 5• Faghuram, Panch 6^ Ba^ Prasad^ Pa^ch -7< Shyamlal, Panch , 8» Oassho bai» Panch i . 9. Sadhurara Panch ,r 1Q< Kishanta bai Panch II* Jailal, Panch •12, Birjo bai, Panch 13^ %imla bai, Panch . 14. ^8SteS^b^anch 15, ShyaBi Kumar, Panch .16^ Mahesh Bam, Panch 17^ Shyama bai, Panch 18« Syrajlal, Panch <i9o Jadrash, Panch, '20, Baliram, Panch, 21.» Shah Jahan, Begum Panch 22. NaEmyXaX, Panch, RespGDdents !(3bi,4 to 22, Pgnch of Gram Panchayat, Singhanpur, resieient of Singhanpur, Block Keshkal, Mstrict Bastar (M«P») i,VAIT..,PETITIOi^ UMDER AaTiCLE 226_OF TI'E CgNSTTUTION OF 1NDIA XI-HC-22 3^'^Nid^, ^Tfl^^Ko, R«ni^y +11*1€<11 ShHlch 311^1 ^sich , , te..^^..^).^ 200 [c|<b<4< (^^fe^) 3n^n'^r f^TWW^T sh*ii<»)<iRa 3iT^T^<TTW^cf cbi^f<n41^ Hiwrf^ te^ <R|<^K ^3:I^T3T1^T t-/ I; .• • n i '•. 1 4-8-2005 5hri Ranblr Singh, Advocate appeeir^ or$ bcholf of Mis^ S. Smghd, Advoca+e, for the petjtioncr. ., , , .^ ;- Shri Psr^ Kotecha, P. L. for respondent^ No.l and 2, Tne matter concerns to the no-confidenee rnotjon pa^^cd oh 29-12-95 agGinst th© petltioner whik sh^ wo^ workin9 cs^ Sarpon&h of ©ram Panchayat, SJn9hanpur, Block Keshkat, bistrjct: Bastar. As the term of ^dd P^nchQyQt ha^ dready expircd and th^r^af+er two more eJsctbn^ havs been held, therefore, this petltion ha^ become jnfructuous and thc wmc i3 dism^ed a^ havlna beeome mfructuouS. ^ Sarve Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge | J__