IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2010 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 37820 of 2010(B) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- M.MADHU,MADALAYIL HOUSE,MEENATHU WARD, VALLIKUNNAM,MAVELIKKARA. BY ADVS. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR, SMT.G.CHITRA. RESPONDENT: ---------------------- THE SECRETARY,REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,ALAPPUZHA,PIN-688 001. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.M. MANOJ. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/12/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No. 37820 OF 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 21st day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T The grievance of the petitioner is with respect to the inaction on the part of the respondent despite the receipt of Ext.P3 application submitted by the petitioner for re-issue of temporary permit under section 87(1)(d) of Motor Vehicles Act,1988. According to the petitioner, Ext.P4 would reveal that the petitioner has submitted such an application before the respondent. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader. According to the petitioner Ext.P3 is an application filed in terms of the provisions under section 87(1)(d) of Motor Vehicles Act. Therefore, in case, the said application has been received and pending, the respondent shall consider the same and pass orders thereon in accordance with law. This shall be done expeditiously, at any rate within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge