1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR . WRIT PETITION NO. 4769 OF 2010. Vitthal Ajabrao Kohale -: VERSUS :- The Executive Engineer, P.W.D. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : OCTOBER 07, 2010. Heard Shri V.G. Wankhede, learned Counsel for petitioner and Shri Thakre, learned A.G.P. for respondent. Petitioner approached Conciliation Officer almost after 10 years and reference was made after 11 years. Even according to the petitioner, the period of service is from 01.06.1983 to 31.08.1984. The Labour Court has found that the continuous service of 240 days was not established. It has further found that in any case dispute was dead one. Learned counsel for petitioner states that had employer produced documents as requested by the 2 petitioner, the completion of service of 240 days could have been established. However, there is no explanation as to why the conciliation officer was approached after 10 years. I, therefore, do not find any jurisdictional error or perversity in the approach of Labour Court. Petition is dismissed. No costs. JUDGE Rgd.