1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPLICATION NO. 5602 OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra ..... ..... ...Applicant. V/s Chandrakant Mahadeo Temkar & Ors. ..... .Respondent. Mr.A.S.Shitole, APP for the applicant-State. Mr.Hemant Vadke, Adv. for the respondents. CORAM: B.R.GAVAI, J. 3rd March, 2010. PC: The State of Maharashtra has moved this appeal being aggrieved by the order dated 24.7.2009 whereby the accused has been acquitted for the offence punishable under sections 306 read with 34 of IPC. 2. It is the prosecution case that son of the complainant viz. Prasad had committed suicide as he was harassed by the accused for not returning the loan given by them to the deceased. 3. Learned trial Court while recording the finding has found that though the incident took place on 25.7.05 and came to be registered on the same day and FIR was lodged on 5.10.2005. It has been further pointed out that the complainant himself has stated that on 22.7.2005 the deceased had telephoned the complainant and told him that he was not feeling well. The trial Court has found that if the cause of suicide was harassment by the accused then in the normal circumstance the deceased would have informed the complainant when he had telephoned him. Learned trial court has further found that even the suicidal note on which 2 the prosecution has relied upon did not show any act or omission on the part of accused which could involved the accused in the offence. 4. No perversity could be found in the reasoned order of the learned trial Court warranting interference. Hence appeal stands dismissed. 3.3.2010.