- 1 - 614.11 rng IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.614 OF 2011 in REVIEW PETITION ST.NO.12 OF 2011 in APPEAL NO. 802 OF 2005 in SUIT NO. 590 OF 1980 Shri Shriram Gangaram Gupta @ Shri Shriram Gangaram Jaiswal. Appellant vs M/s Veekay Builders Associates & 3 ors .. Defendants Mr.A.Y.Sakhare Sr.Advocate i.b.Mr.U.B.Nighot for Appellant Mr.A.C.Singh i,.b Mr. for Defendants CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ DATE: 25th April, 2011 PER COURT 1. This is a Notice of Motion taken out by the original respondent no.4 who was original defendant no.4 in a Civil Suit for condoning the delay in filing the Review - 2 - 614.11 Application. The delay is of 292 days. Admittedly, the respondent no.4 was served with the Appeal. He did not appear. He did not engage a lawyer. The reasons given in the Affidavit filed in support of the Motion, for not engaging a lawyer is financial stringency. There is also no reason given in the Affidavit as to why the respondent no.4 did not keep track of the Appeal proceedings and did not keep inquiring about the further proceedings in the Appeal. We find that the Review Application is an afterthought. There is no reason to condone the delay which is 292 days. Motion is therefore, rejected. Anoop V.Mohta, J D.K.Deshmukh,J - 3 - 614.11