SBCCP NO.293/07. SBCCP NO.290/07. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R 1) S.B. CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.293/2007. in S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3680/1997. Dinesh Khandelwal Vs. R.D. Meena 2) S.B. CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.290/2007. in S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3670/1997. Vimal Kumar Jain Vs. R.D. Meena Date of order : August 21, 2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Vijay Kumar Khandelwal for the petitioners. Shri Pradeep Kalwania, Additional Govt.Counsel General. **** BY THE COURT :- These two contempt petitions have been filed alleging non-compliance of the order of this Court dated 13/9/2006. The direction was to the effect that respondents whle considering case of the petitioners afresh after adding the bonus marks and if the petitioners namnes find place in the merit and if less meritorious persons than petitioners are found tohave been given appointment on the post of Teacher Grade-III, the petitioners may also be given appointment on the post of Teacher Gr.III, if they are otherwise found eligible. SBCCP NO.293/07. SBCCP NO.290/07. 2 The respondents have stated on oath that whatever bonus marks petitioners were entitled to were added and no person less meritorious than petitioners was appointed and that there was change in the bonus marks only in the matter of four candidates. During the course of implementation of the judgment, only four candidates were found eligible for award of bonus marks and the District Establishment Committee considered their cases for awarding bonus marks. Thus, according to the respondents, no candidate having lesser marks than petitioners was appointed. Learned counsel for petitioners however insisted that respondents should be required to show why there was no change in the merit of the petitioner when the court directed to add bonus marks. Despite court's pointed query as to under which rule and on that basis petitioners were entitled to additinal bonus marks, counsel for petitioners was not in a position to answer the same. The writ petitions were filed in the year 1997 and counter affidavit of rejoinder shows that even after awarding bonus marks, petitioners did not come within the merit. In view of above therefore, I do not find any ground to keep these contempt petitions pending. The contempt petitions are accordingly dismissed. Notices of contempt are hereby discharged. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil