IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.8084 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION : SEPTEMBER 6, 2010 SMT. SHASHI SIKKA ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Malkeet Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. BS Chahal, DAG, Punjab. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the respondent-State contends that considering the observations of this Court in order dated 5.5.2010, the petitioner has been adjusted in District Bathinda itself and, therefore, this petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India in challenge to the order of transfer has been rendered infructuous. 2. I have considered the contention of the learned counsel for the respondent-State. 3. The petitioner was transferred to a place almost 200 kilometers away from her place of posting. Since the petitioner has, now, been transferred within the District, no ground for invoking the extra ordinary writ jurisdiction remains. 4. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of. September 6, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?