1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.617/2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2414/1999 Ispat Industries Ltd. Petitioner Vs. The Board of Trustees of Mumbai Port Trust Respondent Mr.S.K.Srivastav for petitioner Mr.E.P.Bharucha ,Sr.Adv.for respondent WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.618/2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2634/2004 The Board of Trustees of Mumbai Port Trust Petitioner Vs. Tariff Authority for Major Ports and Anr.& Ispat Industries Ltd. Respondents Mr.E.P.Bharucha,Sr.Adv.for petitioner Mr.S.K.Srivastav for respondent WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.619/2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2539/1999 The Board of Trustees of Mumbai Port Trust Petitioner Vs. Tariff Authority for Major Ports and Anr Respondents Mr.E.P.Bharucha,Sr.Adv.for petitioner Mr.S.K.Srivastav for respondent 2 CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : 27 TH NOVEMBER, 2009. P.C.:- . These notices of motion are taken out by the petitioners praying that time granted by the Division Bench to Tariff Authority by order dated 10/8/2009 may be extended for further period of three months. 2] Paragraph -10 of the order makes it clear that three months time starts running from the date on which order dated 10/8/2009 is served on the Authority. Admittedly this order is served on the Authority by letter of this Court dated 5/11/2009. Thus, the time granted has not expired till today. Hence no order needs to be passed on these Motions. Needless to say that in case the period expires and the parties need time they can approach this Court for extension of time. Notices of Motion are disposed of. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.] 3 [MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.]