IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION NO : 1177 of 2001 Between: Erabathi Lakshmi W/o Krishna R/o Mallial Vg, Srirampuram Mandal, Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapally, Karimnagar District. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Srirampur Mandal, Karimnagar District. 3 Tatikonda Chandra S/o Late Bapu Shetty R/o Mallial Vg, Srirampur Mandal, Karimnagar District. 4 Tatikonda Gangamma W/o Late Bapu Shetty R/o Mallial Vg, Srirampur Mandal, Karimnagar District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of a Writ of CERTIORARI calling for the records relating to the order passed by the 1st respondent vide Proc.No.B/649/2000, dt: 24.10.2000 cancelling the pattadar Pass-Book and title deeds issued in favour of the petitioner and QUASH the same by duly declaring the order passed by the 1st respondent as illegal, arbitrary without jurisdiction and also contrary to the provisions of A.P. Rights in land and Pattadar Pass-Book Act, 1971 and the Rules made there under the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass- Book Rules 1989. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.RAVI KIRAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER In this writ petition, the order of canceling pattadar pass book and title deeds of the petitioner was questioned. Subsequently, there were civil suits also between the parties and both the counsel now represent that O.S. No.74 of 2004 on the file of learned Senior Civil Judge, at Peddapalli was compromised between the parties and the said compromise was recorded vide orders dated 2.8.2006 in I.A.No.708 of 2006 in the said O.S.No.74 of 2004. In view of the said compromise which is also said to have been implemented between the parties, the cause of action does not survive any more. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs. __________ 12-12-2008 rkk