‘ M 8 6& RamsiaaeriNGag: a wn ni pd b rs 8 D Ssh KurAd Ganes am Nagar Raur TasH & Districi Raipur {3G9 Versus SMT. Amta akshi Adwani ed 28 yeam, Wife cf n Kum A ani, R% Ware House road £arahata Biiaspur (cg) = (SB: §=§Qn’§e Mr. “LP. harmag J“? 3§ $ Ne for the applicant Cmi CRQEg Fassaé on 5th May, 2&3) Thi$ pei’itien és directed againsi the order dated, 10.32.2130? passed by the Judge, ¥am§§y Court iia$pur m Criminai AME. No. 3i20£37 B 17 whereby éhe Judge: Famiiy Cour: has awarded the interim mamtenance of R3. ZSGDI- per month to the :‘espoeni $mt. Anita @ Sakshi. nd 2. When the case is caiied out fog” heazri for the $econd time, none ng appears nor am; representation is made on behalf or the revisioner. ,e or Defauk ass pointed out by the Registry is perused. 4“ The revisioner has fiied ih‘rs revision after a deiay of it) days cf the iimirarion, bu o appimai era for rowoienanon of derav en ms behai rs fried after fi‘iim sf the revision dated 18.32%8 and even iii! iodayr Ne anv oration is iefi excem re dismiss this revision. H‘GH (TEL R: i HhNT?wG§R‘%An L 3? 1,3; f‘ H 1 a v WWW} £25 a w: In ‘1 a l uh aav31 Pw a Ka‘ fa wa ag goki £6 pmécam yca % ? me maxe an: R h R m n (5D g ag mwa ar d v aoh Resoondentianwicam CRQMWAL REViSmN UNDER SECTIQN 1W“ OF THE §AMELY COUR?5 ACT We; wt on