IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH F.A.O. No.2633 of 2007 Date of Decision : September 22, 2010 State of Haryana ....Appellant Versus M/s Birohar Co-operative L&C Society Limited, Birohar and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.S. MANN Present : Mr. Ravish Kaushik, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana Mr. Naresh Markanda, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kavita Markanda, Advocate for respondent No.1. T.P.S. MANN, J. (Oral) By one order, the Court intends to dispose of F.A.O. Nos.2633 to 2641 of 2007 as all the appeals involve identical question of law. Against the award rendered by Shri Gian Singh, Arbitrator- cum-Superintending Engineer, Construction Circle, Hisar in respect of the work “Earthwork excavation for construction of Meham/Lakhan Majra Link Drain including constructions of inlets and Watercourse crossing”, the appellant submitted objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act. Those objections were dismissed by Additional District Judge, Rohtak vide impugned judgment. F.A.O. No.2633 of 2007 -2- In the impugned judgment, learned Additional District Judge held that though an Arbitrator's award could be set aside in case the objector was able to bring his case within the parameters laid down by Section 34(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act yet the objector-appellant failed to show that any of those grounds was taken or available to the objector. Even before this Court the appellant has not been able to bring his case within the parameters as envisaged by Section 34(2) of the Act. Resultantly, F.A.O. Nos. 2633 to 2641 of 2007 are` without any merit and are, therefore, dismissed. ( T.P.S.MANN ) September 22, 2010 JUDGE satish