IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35932 of 2008 Ravi Shankar Kumar S/o Sri Bishundeo Prasad, R/o L.I.G., Flat No. 1/19, Hanuman Nagar, P.S.-Patrakarnagar, Town and District- Patna. ……..Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. Triloki Bhushan Prasad. 3. Biswabhushan Prasad. Both Sons of Ganesh Prasad, residing at Sector-7, Block-8, HIG, Flat No. 12, Bahadurpur, P.S.-Agamkuan, Town and District-Patna. ……..Opposite Parties ----------- 02 14.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is the complainant in this case. The complainant is aggrieved by the fact that the court below has taken cognizance only under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, whereas the facts would disclose that the accused persons are also guilty of cheating and forgery, inasmuch, as they have signed on cheques in order to withdraw the money belonging to difference person. Therefore, they have committed offences under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. This Court has rejects the plea of the petitioner at this stage. This aspect of the matter can be raised by the complainant at the stage of framing of charges. This application is disposed off, with above observation. Safik (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)