IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision:-10.03.2009. 1. C.R. No. 4885 of 2007 Jagdev Singh ...Petitioner Versus Sarwan Singh and others ...Respondents Present:- Mr. Tribhawan Singla, Advocate for the petitioner-defendant No.6 Ms. Sushma Chopra, Advocate for defendants No.1 to 7. 2. C.R. No.5001 of 2007 Piara Singh ....Petitioner Versus Sarwan Singh and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present:- Mr. S.S. Chandi, Advocate for the petitioner-defendant No.5. Ms. Sushma Chopra, Advocate for respondents No. 1 to 7. JASWANT SINGH J.(Oral) The aforesaid two revision petitions are arising out of the civil suit for specific performance of the alleged agreement to sell dated 03.01.1992, allegedly executed by Surender Singh respondent No.9-plaintiff and Smt. Gurran Devi-plaintiff (since deceased) represented by legal representatives-respondents No.10 to 13 wherein petitioners Jagdev singh and Piara Singh as per amended plaint, were impleaded as defendants No.6 C.R. No. 4885 of 2007 -2- and 5 respectively. Jagdev Singh has filed the revision petition No.4885 of 2007 praying for setting aside the order dated 8th September, 2007 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Nakodar, whereby the application filed by him under Order 9 Rule 7 of CPC for setting aside the ex-parte proceedings dated 11.02.2004, was dismissed; whereas Piara Singh- petitioner has filed civil revision petition No.5001 of 2007 praying for setting aside the orders dated 28.05.2007 and dated 08.09.2007 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Nakodar whereby his evidence has been closed by court order and also the application filed by him for comparison of the signatures of late Smt. Gurran Devi and of one Guraya Ram Lamberdar, have been dismissed. Learned counsel for the parties have jointly submitted that during the pendency of the present revision petitions, which were ordered to be heard together, as per their information, the parties have arrived at a mutual compromise and therefore, the aforesaid revision petitions have been rendered infructuous. Therefore, it is prayed that the same be dismissed as infructuous. In view of the statement made by counsel for the parties, both the civil writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. March 10, 2009 (JASWANT SINGH) vj JUDGE