1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 565 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1113 OF 2000 Anil Gulabdas Shah ... Petitioner Vs. State of Maharasdhtra & Ors. ... Respondents Petitioner No. 1 in person. Mr. G.D. Utangale for R. NO. 2. Mr. Virag V. Tulzakpurkar, i/by Wadia Ghandy & Co. for R. No. 4. Mr. K.K Singhavi for Respondent B.M.C. ALONG WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 566 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITON NO.974 OF 1999 Anil Gulabdas Shah ... Petitioner Vs. State of Maharasdhtra & Ors. ... Respondents Petitioner in person. Mr. G.D. Utangale for R. No. 2. Mr. Virag V. Tulzakpurkar, i/by Wadia Ghandy & Co. for R. No. 4. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : 28TH JULY, 2006 DATE : 28TH JULY, 2006 DATE : 28TH JULY, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The main relief sought for is to place the matter for final hearing. Motion also sseks interim relief in the matter disposed of. The counsel for the Respondents points out that the Bench of this court 2 was pleased to refuse the interim relief against which the Petitioner moved the Apex Court. S.L.P. was dismissed. Once that be the case, there is no question of granting any further interim relief. However, considering the observations of the Apex court, the Registry is directed to add the Petition to the weekly board. . With the above observations, both motions disposed of. (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, J.) J.) J.)