1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.08.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA Criminal Original Petition(MD) No.1764 of 2011 Booma Devi .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Karuppayurani Police Station, Madurai. 3.Sathiya 4.Indira 5.Thanikodi 6.Pappa 7.Nagu .. Respondents (R3 to R7 are impleaded as per order of this Court in M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011 in Crl.O.P(MD)No.1764 of 2011 dated 23.02.2011) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to direct the second respondent to give Police protection for the petitioners' life and property and also to take action as against the proposed accused based on complaint dated 21.01.2011. For Petitioner :Mr.C.Vakeeswaran For Respondents:Mr.K.V.Rajarajan Govt. Advocate (Crl.side) for R1 & R2. :Mr.S.Balakarthick for R3 to R7 O R D E R The petitioner approaches this court with a prayer to direct the second respondent to give Police protection for the petitioner's life and property and also to take action as against the proposed accused based on complaint dated 21.01.2011. 2.The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that though she has given an application sought for police protection, the respondents 3 to 7 were entered upon the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 house of the petitioner and they were not permitted to enter into the house of the petitioner. Hence, the petitioner gave a complaint for police protection but the respondents 1 and 2 have not taken any steps. Hence, she filed this petition. 3.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side)and filed status report on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2 and it is stated that both parties are mother-in-law and daughter-in- law were enquired and it is stated that the matter is settled amicably, so, that the representation may be closed. Now the learned Counsel for the respondents 3 to 7 would submit that the matter is settled amicably and they are not residing the house of the petitioner. 4.Considering the arguments advanced by the respective counsel, this Court is constrained to pass a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 herein to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 21.01.2011. Accordingly, the respondents 1 and 2 are directed to consider the representation given by the petitioner herein dated 21.01.2011 and pass suitable orders in accordance with law within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and if necessary give a police protection in accordance with law. With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(T&P) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Karuppayurani Police Station, Madurai. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai +One cc to Mr.S.Balakarthick, Advocate, SR.No.26292 gsr rl/5c – 11.8.2011 Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1764 of 2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/