IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 5468 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 5468 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 5468 OF 2008 Smt.Savitribai Hiraman Salve. ... Petitioner. V/s. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and another. ... Respondents. S.G.Deshmukh i/b. M.S.Kumthekar for the petitioner. A.J.Bhor for the respondents. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 4th September 2008. DATED: 4th September 2008. DATED: 4th September 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- . Heard both parties. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Corporation submits that the application made by the daughter-in-law of the petitioner is not maintainable and that she cannot be granted allotment of the suit premises in her name. However, no such decision has been communicated to the daughter-in-law of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent- Corporation submits that a reasoned order would be communicated to her within a period of two weeks from today. He further submits that till then no action will be taken against the petitioner. 3. In the above view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)