THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION NO.33817 OF 2011 O R D E R: This writ petition is filed seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not issuing permission/approval to the petitioner for construction of building in respect of the property admeasuring 3700 sq.yards under Sy.No.44/1, situated at Miyapur Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and keeping the application in File No.CSC/27396/06/05/2011 pending as illegal and arbitrary and consequently, direct the respondents to issue permission/approval to the petitioner for construction of building in the said premises. 2. It is stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition that the petitioner is the lawful owner and possessor of the aforementioned land having acquired the same by way of succession. The petitioner wanted to develop the subject property and entered into a Development Agreement-cum-General Power of Attorney, dated 09.09.2010, in favour of M/s.Ashish Infra Developers (India) (P) Ltd., Hyderabad. On 06.05.2011, the petitioner, through his G.P.A. Holder, approached the respondents by way of an application for grant of the building permission with all the required documents and also paid an amount of Rs.16,780/- through demand draft. The said application was received by the respondents on the same day vide File No.CSC/27396/06/05/2011, but the respondents neither issued any approval nor gave any reasons for not issuing the approval and kept the same pending. Hence, the writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that inspite of giving an application, dated 06.05.2011, in a requisite form by paying the required fee, the application of the petitioner for grant of permission for construction of the building was not considered and hence, he prays to issue a direction to the respondents to consider the application of the petitioner. 4. On the other hand, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents contended that the application of the petitioner would be considered in accordance with law by the concerned authorities in terms of the rules and regulations and also the building bye laws. 5. It seems that the petitioner made an application on 06.05.2011 before the respondents for grant of permission for construction of a building and the same was taken on file by the respondents as File No.CSC/27396/06/05/2011, but the respondents neither issued any approval nor rejected the plan with reasons. Therefore, respondent No.1 is directed to take appropriate decision on the application, dated 06.05.2011, of the petitioner in accordance with law and particularly with reference to the building bye-laws within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _​_____________________ JUSTICE K.C.BHANU 23rd December, 2011 Note:- Furnish C.C. today. B/O AMD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION NO.33817 OF 2011 Date:23.12.2011 AMD