IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 635 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.7.2010 Bhupinder Pal Sharma .....Petitioner Versus Tejpal Singh Saini ….Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri Vijay Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri S.S. Sahu, AAG, Punjab, for the respondent. Hemant Gupta, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondent states that after the order was passed on 19.5.2010, the petitioner has been paid revised pension and death-cum-retirement gratuity vide order dated 26.5.2010. In view of the said fact, no orders are called for in the present petition. Hence, the present petition is dismissed. However, if the petitioner has any other claim, he may submit a representation in this regard, which shall be considered by the respondent in accordance with law, expeditiously. 28.7.2010 [HEMANT GUPTA ] ds JUDGE