HIGHCOURT_gFCHHATrLSGARH;gll,ASPUR WritPefjtion rCr)No.7100of 2008 ^eljtjoners 1. PX. Sharma, Executive Officer presently workmg in Antyavyavsayi Cooperative, Finance and Devejopment, Biiaspur, R/b. Ciyi! Llnss, Rajnandgson, Dsstrict Rajnandgaon, CG. 2. G.P. Sharma, Accountant, working in Antyavyavsayl Cooperative, Finance and Deveiopmeni, Jagdaipur (CG). BesP°ndents Raju Versus 1. Chhattisaarh State Antyavyavsayi Coopsratlv®, Ffnancc and Devetopment Corporation, Raipur, through its Manag'ng Dlrector. 2, Coljector-cum-Presjdent, Dlstrict Anfr/avyavasayj Coopera?sv©, Fjnance and Deveiopment Corporafion, Durg. 3. Superintendent of Police, Durg, C,©. 4. Town (nspector, Durg, CG. (Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constjtution of India) SB: Hon'ble IVIr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Mr. T.K. Tiwarl, counse! for the petstloners. Mr. Vinay Harit, Deputy Advocate Genera! for the State. ORALQRDER (Passec! on thls5 dsy ofJanuary, 2009) By this petition, the petitianers seeR quashlng of ttie comptaint dated 5-1-2cx)6 on the ground that no case has been made out to initlate a crimina! case against the petitioners* 2} On perusal of the papers, prima tacie, it appears that a case has been made out to initiate a crimtnal case against the petitionere. Wtthout expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, 1 am of the vlew that the complaint cannot be quashed at thls stage. However, the petitioners may raise objections during Investigation or thereafter, if so adMnised. 3) tn view of the foregoing, tfiis petition is cfismjssed. Consequently, t.A.No.1 also stancis dismissed. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge