..'. -I; I?4-THEH1GHCOU-STOPJUBICATUREOFCHHATFISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C.Ko.SS0) /2007 Aoolicant Respoadente Versys I) ^ ^A ^ ^^' ...^^y ..•••"".^ ' \.5)V ^^w 2) ^ Saatosh Kumar Yadav S/o Mahru Sam Yadav Aged about 27 years R/o Lakhena^ir Dha! Tudrapariya Travels Lakhenagar Cho'wk, Talisil & District Raipur (C.G-) (Owner ofthe 'yeliiele) L Vasugi Sahu W/Q Late Lofanath Sahu Aged about 38 years, R/Q Shiwm^r Raipur, Tahsil & District Saipur {C.G.l Krishna bssss.ar Kadrs^ S/o Bishaichu Rani Kadra Aged about 2"7 years C/o Thnxigh : Santosh Kvxaar Yadav S/o Mahru Rain Yadav, Lsikfajesagar Dfaal Ruddrapria Travels Lakhe Nagar Chowk, Tahsil & District Raipur {C.G.jl |Driver of the Veluele^ s-.'«- APPLICATIOS 3t The Orieatial Insiirance Cosipany Tbroitgh: Bivisional ^ Manager DiwsiiBnalOffiee, Kaefafa.ari Cfapwk, Madina ByiNiog, Ja3 lEoaid. Tafasil 8s District Swssw (C.».) (Insurer cf the Vehicle) , ^Egl^RASSQNOFTHE sn^t'g^ , K-t\* wS^i sti*ii=t>^^ ^•t ' ,1 f; 'S^I •^WM^, 9Til+f'IS. [qWlfly 3T(^?r 'qg^? *l(*tCTI tt>*<lth _€l.cc...^s3.(a'!h. "'H^ 200 ftre^ET" sn^ilwnwHfef 5.10.2007 Mr. Vivek Rothore, ^dvo[ Heard on I.A. No.I, on the pel-itisri for restopation o-^ prefert-ed wi'tha delay of 41 d4«. Regsons ossi9ned for fi thaitinessofthAappelSant. For the reosons indicat< the de!ay is cpndoned. Alsd Hearcl dn M.C.C.N AA.A. [c]NoJ56/'07: This Court vide order order that if the q>pellant doe^ amount. os per Section 173 of of one week, 1-he appea! shalt b^ qppellmt in filmg the receipt dismissed fop non-compliance 4 receipt of the same in the mat tiwlci'ili iiii'ff^ls^t <pi|*<;lt ^; srfigq an^r |;ats for the applicant. lippfication for condonation of delay in filing \.A. [c] No,7S6/07; as the same has been ing this restoration appiication with detay is | " d in the application, •t'he same is a!iowed and ^ ^.389/07, an appiication for- restoration of |dated 20.6.2W7 had passed a preemptory s not fiie the deposit receipt of the owar'ded the Motor Vehicles :Act, 1988, within a period dismissed and accor'dmgly on default of the in stipulated period, the appeal was treated if the preemptory order dafed 20.6.2CU7 on Smce -the appellant hijs now deposited the feeeipt of the aword /'!, amount, The M.C.C. is ullowed c|nd the miscellaneous app^Hs restored to its originoil number subject to opp^l!ant's depositing a sum of Rs.5CX3/- with the High Court Legal Aid Commitfee within a period of 15 days and fi!es the w. ^ Sd/- Bhtrendra Mishra Judge