IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 1ST JUNE 2010 / 11TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 16220 of 2010(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. SHAJI MARKOSE, S/O. MARKOSE, AGED 43 YEARS, VATTAPPILLIL HOUSE, PUTHUPARIYARAM P.O., CHITTOOR, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 2. K.R.SURESH KUMAR, S/O. K.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, AGED 46 YEARS, KOCHUPARAMBIL HOUSE, PUTHUPERIYARAM P.O., THODUPUZHA. 3. NOBLE THOMAS, S/O. THOMAS, AGED 40 YEARS, MOONNAMTHOTTAM, ARAKKULAM P.O., THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 4. T.K.SAJEEVAN, S/O. KUMARAN, AGED 45 YEARS, THOTTAPPILLIL HOUSE, KOLANI P.O., THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.ANIL THOMAS(T) SMT.K.V.RESHMI SRI.M.N.SANDEEP RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THODUPUZHA DEPOT., IDUKKI DISTRICT. 3. THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY S.C. SHRI V.V. NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.16220 of 2010-B - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 1st day of June, 2010. JUDGMENT The petitioners are working as empanelled drivers in Thodupuzha Depot of the first respondent. Various documents have been produced in support of their plea. The present dispute is regarding the deletion of their names from the proposal sought to be submitted by the Corporation before the Government for giving regularisation to similarly placed employees. According to the petitioners, they are also eligible to be included in the list. Seeking for appropriate consideration of their names, the petitioners have filed Ext.P9 series representations before the first respondent. 2. Heard learned Standing Counsel for the Corporation. 3. It is up to the first respondent to consider the claims raised by the petitioners with reference to the details available and the records maintained by the Corporation. Therefore, the first respondent will consider the claims of the petitioners and take appropriate action as enjoined by law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/