IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-16699 of 2011 (O&M) Kashmiri .. Petitioner vs State of Haryana .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. J. S. Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Godara, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal, J. By filing the present petition, the petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in FIR No. 77 dated 23.4.2011, registered under Sections 323, 498-A, 406, 506, 34 IPC at Police Station City Chandhut, District Palwal. The petitioner is the mother-in-law of the daughters' of the complainant. Two sisters were married to two brothers i.e. sons of the petitioner. One of the sons and husband of the petitioner were arrested and have been released on regular bail. One son of the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail. Learned counsel for the State submitted that jewellary is yet to be recovered. However, in my view, that cannot be a ground for seeking the custody of an accused as it is yet to be ascertained as to how much jewellary was given in dowry and in whose possession the same is. Considering the aforesaid facts, in my opinion, the petitioner deserves to the concession of anticipatory bail. She is directed to appear before the Investigating officer on 5.8.2011 at 10.00 a.m. to join investigation and thereafter whenever summoned. However, in case of arrest, she shall be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer. She shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands disposed of. 25.7.2011 (Rajesh Bindal ) vs Judge