IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C. Review No. 32 of 2008 Date of decision: 27.6.2008 Lal Singh Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Deepak Gupta, J. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner: Mr. R.P.Singh, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. Advocate General & Ms. Subh Mahajan, Dy.Advocate General. Per Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral) By means of this review petition, the petitioner seeks review of the order dated 7.4.2008 passed by this Court. This Court while deciding CWP No.1263 of 2002 had set aside the order of the learned Tribunal only on the ground that the finding of the tribunal that no notice had been issued by the disciplinary authority to the delinquent official indicating the grounds of disagreement with the Inquiry Officer was not correct. The learned Tribunal had set-aside the impugned order only on the ground that the grounds of disagreement had 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? not been supplied to the delinquent official. We had found as a fact, which fact is not disputed, that copy of the letter dated 15.7.1994 containing the reasons of disagreement was sent to the delinquent official. Therefore, the order of the learned tribunal had to be set-aside. There is no error appeared on the record of the case. The Review Petition is, therefore, dismissed. We may, however, make it clear that the petitioner shall be at liberty to raise all the grounds which are available to him before the learned tribunal. (Deepak Gupta), J. 27th June, 2008 ( Rajiv Sharma). J. ™