IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 10875 of 2004 Between: 1 B. Srinivasa Rao, Lecturer,V.R.S. & Y.R.N. College, Chirala - 523 157, . Prakasam District 2 A. Satish Babu, Lecturer,V.R.S. & Y.R.N. College Chirala - 523 157, Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Principal Secretary, Govt of A.P., Higher Education, J. Block 4th Floor, Secretariat , Hyderabad,. 2 The Commissioner of Collegiate Education, Nampally, Hyderabad.. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to implement the benefits as per the G.O.Rt. No. 1840 Education (C.E. II-1) Department, dt. 05.11.1994 as per the proceedings issued by the Second respondent in Memo No. SP 5406/CE.II.1/2002-4, dt. 12.2.2004 and consequently direct the respondents herein to refix the pay from the date of appointments and pay the arrears of salary including the career Advance System and other benefits admissible. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.P.R.PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court Made the Following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioners aggrieved by the non- implementation of the proceedings dated 12.02.2004 under which the 1st respondent Government directed the 2nd respondent to implement the G.O.Rt.No.1840, dated 05.11.1994 by re-fixing the pay of the petitioners. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the 2nd respondent, in spite of the directions of the 1st respondent, has not implemented the above said order. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader and considered the material on record. 4. In view of the specific order of the respondents dated 12.02.2004, the 2nd respondent is under an obligation to implement the said order. Hence, the 2nd respondent is directed to implement the said order, if not already implemented within four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 5. The writ petition is, accordingly, allowed. No costs. That Rule Nisi has been made absolute as above. Witness the Hon’ble Sri Devinder Gupta, the Chief Justice on this the Wednesday, Thirtieth day of June, Two thousand and four. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Principal Secretary, Govt of A.P., Higher Education, J. Block 4th Floor, Secretariat , Hyderabad,. 2 The Commissioner of Collegiate Education, Nampally, Hyderabad.. 3. Two CCs to the Government Pleader (Higher Education) High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 4. Two CD copies.