IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 7736 of 2010 Date of Decision: 29.11.2010 Harmala Kaur .... Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Gorakh Nath, Advocate for the petitioner 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? 0 ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Order impugned is dated 12.12.2009 whereby learned Court below has observed that since shares have already been decided and mutation was carried out which was never challenged in the Competent Court, hence, deciding the shares once again would be futile exercise. Petitioner has not explained latches as to why order dated 12.12.2009 was not challenged at the earliest. Moreover, in view of the observation made by the Court below in paragraph No. 8 of the judgment, no interference is called for. Dismissed. (ALOK SINGH) 29.11.2010 JUDGE reena