/^ "w w rai?r IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION ( 8 ) No. QQ(_\\ Of 2010 ^" PETITIONER: Ashok Naik S/o Shri Dolamani Naik, aged about 39 years, Occupation- Service, Head Master , posted at Prunary Sehool Nawapali, R/o Village and Post Baramkela, District Raigarh (CG). .\^y :^J&^ ^£i5^ l''.-,.fi^'"\ ^' •'yy'" • RESPONDENTS: Versus l." The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. The District Education OfRcer, Raigarh, District Raigarh (CG). 3. The Block Education Officer, Baramkela , District Raigarh (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA T lt 78 ~5^ ^liqidq, 0tl1<-l'l<», fitClKHy r, P- C^ 9<<,-6oil /fo '"l^ 200 sn^i^ (•^^r) 311^51 ^BT R-IJ'* ^t^ 3TT^T ^i^i^ TRITW ^fel 311^1 SB : HON'BLBMR. JUSTiCS PRITIWKER DIWAKER 22.10.2010 Shri Kainal Kishore Patel. c Shri Vaibhav Goverdb.an., P. Counsel for the petitioner entitled to benefit oftwo advan.cf having oassed B.Ed. exaniiuation own cost. It is subiuitted fhat th( petition is no longer res integra decided by the Hon'ble Suprem Saxena Vs. State of M.P. & Ors. >unsel for fhe petitioner. .|L. for fhe State. ^libinits tliat fhe petitioaer is ic.crenients on account of he before Iiis apTtointjnent at bis issue .uivolved ia fhe preseut jtnd the same has been fiiiaUy Court" ia fhe csse of Asha J2009 (IIIJMPJR (SC) 59. It is further subiaitted tha| similEir view ia its order dated 6| 6257/2008. Counsel for fhe peti1| order dated 29.4.2010 passed i^ whereui relyuig upon tJie judgniei case ofAsha Saxena (supra) aad ia aaofher Writ Appeal No. 87| issued for consideration of fhe uicreinents as per circular dated of Madhya Rradesb, after verificaj petition.. Counsel for fhe State subBaji would also be considered on the l=hi<if(Ti<Tll tTTTRff if f^t <f^^i< ^stRm sii^i tbis Court has also taken a 12.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No. ioner furttier submits fhat the Writ Appeal N0. 124/2009, it of th.e Suprenie Court in the |the order passed by this Court 1/2009. directions have been •ase for eTant of two advance 21.9.1974 issiied bv the State ion of the facts pleaded in fhe its tliat case ofthe petitioners ame lia.es. I.HG—78 r TS? '<iitLii<i^, ®tily'i<o,[i«vii'9lj,< "^, 200 sn^i •TSRT ( I<=|{-I»<<IEI) 3D^i ^il R-li'* TT^H STI^ sb*iiqi TOnwnftg 3ii^i —~^- shi*i[<ri<i1Tl ^TFRff ^f fei^ <f^^l< ^siRnan^i In view of above, the pe^ition is disposed of wifh. a direction to fhe respoadent autho; petitioner for grant of two advan lities to decide the claiai of the ;e increnients as per circular dated 21.9.1974 issued by the ^tate of Madhya Pradesh after ven&cation of the facts pleaded in] eight weeks fiwmi today. It is inade clear tbat fhis opinion on raerits of the case s| fhe petition wifhin a period of Court has not expressed aiiy nd the authoritv concemed would be at Uberty to decide fht sam.e stiict.lv ia accordaace with law. Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge