IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 5280 of 2010 Date of decision: 01.11.2010 Shagun Kumar …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others ...Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner: Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Vivek Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General. Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral) 1. Keeping in view the facts of the case and especially the fact that the child of the petitioner is stated to be suffered from mental retardation, I feel it is a fit case where respondent No. 2 be directed to sympathetically consider the case of the petitioner for posting him at a place where his child can receive suitable treatment and education. 2. The petitioner may make appropriate representation in this behalf within one week and the said 1 Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes. -: 2 :- representation shall be decided on or before 30th November, 2010. Till then, the petitioner may take advantage of the order dated 10.08.2010. The petition stands disposed of. Copy Dasti. (Deepak Gupta) Judge November 1, 2010 (rajni)