1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER ST.NO.760 OF 2008 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.915 OF 2008 Harbhajan Singh B. Ajimal & Ors. ... Appellants Vs. M/s Anmol Fluid Control Products ... Respondents Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Mr. Surel S. Shah for Appellants. Ms. Purnima G. Bhatia for respondent no. 1. Mr. A.K..... for B.M.C. Coram : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J Date : 1ST September, 2008 P.C. 1. This appeal is preferred against interim order dated 11th July, 2008 passed by Bombay City Civil Court. By the impugned order, the application filed by the appellants for interim injunction to restrain respondent no. 1 from carrying out construction on the plot bearing City Survey No.1406/01 of village Malad till the compliance of the terms and conditions mentioned in the Indemnity Bond dated 24th January, 2006 The second interim relief sought by the appellants was to restrain to respondent no. 2 – Corporation from 2 issuing occupation certificate and completion certificate to respondent no. 1 unless respondent no. 1 complied with the terms and conditions of the Indemnity Bond. 2. The two terms and conditions of the Indemnity Bond were to remove the debris caused by caving in of the wall constructed by the appellants and reconstruction of the compound wall constructed by the appellants between the two properties. The photographs produced before the Court show that the debris has been removed and the wall constructed. This has been noted in the impugned order and the interim reliefs refused to the appellants. There is further development in the matter and that is respondent no. 2 – Corporation has issued occupation certificate and completion certificate to the Architect of respondent no.1. The impugned order is a speaking order. In my opinion, there is no need to interfere with the same. The Appeal from Order is dismissed in limine. ( Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J.)