IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 19202 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION : 19.10.2011 Smt. Shyama Jain .... PETITIONER Versus State of Haryana and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH Present: Mr. Ajay Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. ( Oral ) The petitioner claims herself to be an oustee, whose 8 biswas of land, situated at Narnaul, was acquired by the State of Haryana, in the year 1992, for establishing an urban sector by the Haryana Urban Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as `the HUDA'). It is the case of the petitioner that being an oustee, under the policy dated 18.3.1992 (Annexure P-1), formulated by the HUDA, she is entitled to allotment of a residential plot. It is the further case of the petitioner that it is incumbent upon the HUDA to settle the claim of the oustee, before offering plots to the general public. Though the petitioner filed an application in the year 2007, copy of which has been annexed with the petition as Annexure P-2, but the same has not been considered. Before approaching this court, the petitioner has not CWP No. 19202 of 2011 -2- given any representation to the Administrator, HUDA, Gurgaon (respondent No.3). In view of the aforesaid facts, without issuing notice of motion, as it will un-necessary delay the matter, we dispose of this petition with liberty to the petitioner to make a detailed representation to respondent No.3 with regard to her claim and in case, any such representation is made within one month from today, respondent No.3 is directed to consider and decide the same expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months, in accordance with the policy of the HUDA as well as the order dated May 16, 2011, passed by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No. 19927 of 2009, titled as Sandeep Versus State of Haryana and others. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE October 19, 2011 ( PARAMJEET SINGH ) ndj JUDGE