IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 21631 of 2010 Date of Decision: 6.12.2010. S.D. Manchanda --Petitioner Versus Haryana State Housing Corporation and another --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Naveen Daryal, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. Mrigank Sharma, Advocate present in the Court on behalf of Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. Petitioner was working as J.E. (Electrical) in the respondent- Corporation. He was promoted to the post of S.D.E vide order dated 7.11.2008 (Annexure P-1). On his promotion, he joined the promotional post on 7.11.2008 as is evident from Annexure P-2. He is working on the promotional post of S.D.E since then. The short grievance of the petitioner is that respondents are proceeding to re-examine the promotion of the petitioner on some misconception of rules. Admittedly, no adverse order has been passed against the petitioner as on date. Not even a show cause notice has been issued to him. CWP. No. 21631 of 2010 -2- This petition is premature. It is, however, observed that respondents shall not pass any adverse order against the petitioner without complying with the principles of natural justice. With these observations, this petition is disposed of. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 6.12.2010. lucky