HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital the May 03rd, 2006 Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 364 of 2006 Order on the bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Bablu S/o Jagpal R/o Village Hasanpur Mazra P.S. Kotwali District Saharanpur ….. Applicant Versus State of Uttaranchal ….. Opposite Party Arising out of case crime No.27 of 2006 Under Sections 489-B IPC Police Station – Jhabrada District - Haridwar __________________________________________________________ _ Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Heard Sri Manish Arora learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. Perused the record. The case diary is also available with the learned AGA. It was contended on behalf of the applicant that the FIR and the statement of Mahipal do not disclose as to who gave alleged counterfeit currency note to the complainant. It was further contended that the currency notes were handed over to the complainant and the other persons and the recovery has been shown from the possession of the applicant. It was contended that the recovery is not believable and there was no recovery of other notes except three notes from the possession of the applicant. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is a fit case for bail. Let the accused-applicant, be released on bail on executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned. (J. C. S. Rawat, J.) Dated 03.05.2006 LSR