IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6665 of 2008 RAMADHAR PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 07.05.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is an accused for offences punishable under Sections 304B and 120B / 34 of the Indian Penal Code . Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner is the husband of the deceased but in the postmortem report ( Annexure-4) the doctor specifically stated that in his opinion the cause of death could not be ascertained by examination. Learned for the petitioner further submits that the viscera was sent for examination and the Forensic Science Laboratory reported that no metallic alkaloidal glycosidal, pesticidal or volatile poison could be detected in the dark brown fluid of the plastic jar. Learned counsel for the petitioner also avers that in the said circumstances the allegation that the deceased was poisoned to death is completely falsified. It is also stated that the deceased had got appointment for the post of Block Teacher two days prior to her death and hence there was no reason why she should be killed in such a manner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further contends the he has remained in custody since December, 2007. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed. Let petitioner, namely Ramadhar Prasad, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000.00 (rupees ten thousand) with - 2 - two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl.District Judge, F.T.C.No.5, Sitamarhi in connection with Sessions Trial No.13 of 2008 arising out of Sitamarhi P.S.Case No.450 of 2006. sunil ( S.N.Hussain,J.)