IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.11 of 2007 BHUSHAN YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 9 20.3.2009 In the instant writ application the petitioner prays for directing the A.C.J.M., Rosera for passing an appropriate order in Misc. Case No.52/05. According to the petitioner Rosera P.S. Case No.19/98 under section ¾ of Explosive Substance Act was instituted against him and others. Police after investigation submitted final form not chargesheetting the petitioner.The opposite party informant filed protest petition which too was dismissed by order dated 19.11.2003 passed by the S.D.J.M., Rosera as contained in Annexure-3. A revision application was also rejected by the revisional court in Cr.Rev.No.11 of 2004 vide Judgment dated 22.3.2005. Thereafter the petitioner filed the instant writ application that in the light of recommendations made by the police as contained in final report (Annexure-2) the court may proceed under sections 182/211 of the I.P.C. The grievance of the petitioner is that though more than three years have elapsed still no appropriate order on one way or the other has been passed. In view of the submissions of the petitioner his grievance seems justified and as such in the facts and circumstances of the case this Court directs A.C.J.M.,, Rosera to dispose of the Misc. Case No.52/05 expeditiously preferably within three months from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order if the 2 same has not been disposed of. With the aforesaid observation and direction this writ application is allowed to the extent stated above. Anilksinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)