CRM No. M-31931 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-31931 of 2010 Date of decision: 28.03.2011 Sukhdev Kaur ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Gaurav Chopra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Bhavna Gupta, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Munish Behl, Advocate, for the complainant. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.89 dated 24.8.2010 under Sections 406/498-A of the Indian Penal Code, Police Station Amloh, District Fatehgarh Sahib. This Court vide order dated 29.10.2010 has directed to release the petitioner on interim bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that husband was arrested and was enlarged on regular bail by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, vide order dated 13.12.2010. He further states that learned Magistrate vide order dated 13.12.2010 has specifically observed that recovery has already been effected. Learned counsel appearing for the complainant states that 10 tola jewellery has not been recovered so far. CRM No. M-31931 of 2010 -2- Ms. Bhavna Gupta, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, on the instructions of ASI Major Singh, who is present in the Court, states that petitioner has joined the investigation and recovery is yet to be made. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, petition is allowed. Order dated 29.10.2010 is made absolute, subject to the conditions mentioned under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. However, it is clarified that petitioner shall keep on co-operating in the investigation and if she fails to do so, Investigating Officer shall be at liberty to get the bail cancelled. (Alok Singh) Judge March 28, 2011 R.S.