IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26238 of 2009 ABU JAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 26.8.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 300 to 400 persons encircled, chased the father of the informant and killed along with seven others. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is not named in the F.I.R. No doubt Abu Jar son of Reyaz is named but at latter stage that is rectified as son of Wased Ali, in no case can be a case of wrong identification. Investigation is pending for this petitioner. The nature of case and the manner in which eight persons were killed does not justify the petitioner to allow on bail basing the discussed submission of learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI