-V : ld ^ ' ^ENCH .0^^' S,B. (Setmw Matter) IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fCHHATTISGARHl WRIT PETITIONfC) N0. 72011. PETITIONER: ^\K\^^ ^ ^^^>T •-^y" ^ .(t"'' ^•--" ^ Resoondents Vijay Kuinar Kedia, son of Late Omprakash Kedia, aged about 42 years, residence ofQ.No. 103, Kirodunal Colony, Thana Road, Handi Chowk, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Rural and Urban Development Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhatdsgarh. 2. Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 3. Sub Divisional Qfficer cura Rent Control Authority, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ^4. Seth Kirodimal Tmst, Through Its President^igarh, District Raigarh, Chhatdsgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA y^ \1 •^^SSS=^ p ^ •^ HIG-H COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION CC) No. 4922 of2011 PETITIONER : VyayKumarKedia. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRTT PETITION L1NDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmjTION OFMDL^.. SBiHonlble Shri SatishK. Aemhotil.J. Present: Shri C.J.K.Rao, Advocate for tfae petitioner. Shri V.V.S.Moorthy, Deputy Advocate General forthe State/ respondent No. 1 to 3. 3. 4. (Passed on 26UI day ofAugiist, 2011) The petitioner impugns the order dated 18.08.2011 (Aimexure P/l) passed by the Rent Controlling Authority, Raigarh, under the provisions of Chhattisgarh Accoiiimodation Control Act, 1961. Shri Rao submits that only three days time have been given to tlie petitioner to vacate the premises in dispute, thus, within such a short period, the petitioner is not in a position to take recourse to statirtory appellate fomm i.e. the District Judge or the Additional District Judge, having the territorial jurisdiction. Thus, some more time may be yanted to enable the petitioner to take recourse to statuton' appellate forum. Shri Moorfhy, leamed Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondent No. 1 to 3 submits fhat some time may be gi'anted to the petitioner. In view of above submission, the time granted by the Rent Controlling Authority, Raigarh, is extended to a fiirther period of seven days to vaeate tiie premises in dispute. Iii the meantime, liberty is resei-ved to the petitioner to take recourse to statutory appellate fomm that may be available to the petitionei- under the provisions oflaw, ifso advised. W.ith the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sdi- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Amit