IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 23RD OCTOBER 2007 / 1ST KARTHIKA 1929 WP(C).No. 26424 of 2007(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SARITHA N.P.(MINOR), AGED 17 YEARS, REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER AND GUARDIAN SREEDHARAN N.P., AGED 43 YEARS, S/O.KUTTAN, NADUVIL PURAKKAL HOUSE, PUTHUR AMSOM CHERUKUNNU DESOM, TIRURANGADI TALUK, PO.PUTHUR 676503, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT POLYTECHNIC PO ANGADIPPURAM, PERINTHALMANNA. 3. THE PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT POLYTECHNIC, TIRURANGADI. 4. THE PRINCIPAL, SEETHISAHIB MEMORIAL POLYTECHNIC, TIRUR. 5. THE GOVERNMENT VANITHA POLYTECHNIC, KOTTAKKAL. 6. SHRI.M.SANKARAN, PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT POLYTECHNIC, PERINTHALMANNA. BY G.P.SRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/10/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Antony Dominic, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 26424 of 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 23rd day of October, 2007 JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court for a direction to the respondents to admit her to Diploma Course of her choice in any one of the Polytechnic Colleges in Malappuram District according to her rank and as per her turn. It is now submitted that as against the prescription in the notification, the petitioner did not produce the nativity certificate to the effect that she was a resident of Malappuram. 2. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that the petitioner has already been granted allotment in one of the Colleges in Malappuram. The petitioner, however, submits that she desires to get admission in Civil Engineering and she may be accommodated in one of the seats. 3. In view of the fact that the petitioner has already been granted allotment, it is not be possible, at this distance of time, to re-allot the subject, as it will upset the whole allotments. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. Antony Dominic, Judge. mn.