IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 96 OF 2008 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 94 OF 2005 Nikhil Dhirajlal Mehta .... Applicant. vs. Harsha Nikhil Mehta .... Respondent. Ms. Seema Sarnaik for Applicant. Mr. P.G. Lad for Respondent. CORAM : J.N. PATEL, & MRS. R.S. DALVI, JJ. DATE : 15th OCTOBER, 2008. (IN CHAMBER AT 2.45 P.M.) P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The application has been made for implementation of the consent terms arrived at between the parties and recorded by the Court under which the Family Court Appeal No. 94 of 2005 came to be disposed of. 3. We have given several opportunities to the parties to act upon the consent terms. But what we find is that the parties are raising contentious issues for abiding by the consent terms. 4. In view of the fact that the appeal has been disposed of as per the consent terms, the judgment and order of the Family Court stands merged in the appellate order and the parties are at liberty to execute the decree on the terms and conditions the appeal has been disposed of 5. The application stands disposed of accordingly. (J.N. PATEL, J.) (R.S. DALVI, J.)