IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.54609 of 2007 PANNA LAL CHAUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR - - - - 4. 8.7.2008 Heard. It is wrong recording of fact by the learned trial Judge that the name of the petitioner appeared as the person who had kept the victim in his custody. The victim’s statement in paragraph 122 of the case diary does not bear it out. In the entire case diary there is nothing against the petitioner except the statement recorded in paragraph 122 that the petitioner was also amongst the criminals while firing were being exchanged between the police and the culprits. Regard being had to the absence of material against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be directed to be released from custody on his furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the AdditionalSessions Judge, Fast Track Court 2 IV,West Champaran, Bettiah in sessions Trial No. 599 of 2007 arising out of Nautan P.S.Case No. 44 of 2002. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)