w C^"^CT5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. AT - BILASPUR Writ Petition fS^ No. |lA<1 of 2008 Petitioner fsl < ^«l"»"am"1-': Domar Singh Nirmalkar, Aged - 45 years, S/o Shri Durdeshi Nirmalkar, TtZ/g-Z-oS" Darshena, Y\o^r^L Aged -51 years, S/o Late Laxminath Darshena, Kripa Ram Nirmalkar, Aged - 46 years, S/o Shri Ram Nirmaikar, ^4. Arjun Ram Netam, Aged - 53 years, S/o Shri Thanwar Netam, ^. Rambharosa Dhruw Aged - 54 years, S/o Shri Dhanau Rarn Dhruw 6. Bihari Lal Dehariya, Aged -51 years, \^: S/o Shri Ramjatan Dehariya, ^-?. Nanhu Ram Yadav, Aged - 45 years, S/o Shri Bodhi Ram Yadav, L^ / Respondents Khorbahara Ram Dhruw, Aged - 50 years, S/o Shri Balwant Ram Dhruw ^. Beni Ram Sahu, ^-l'^ Aged - 46 years, S/o Shri Mansha Ram Sahu, 1,2,^, 64o3 All the petitioner no.fi to 4, 6 to 7, ^&9)are working as - Bhritya and 3 ^5 petitioner no.^5& sjlare.working as - Chainmen, at - office of the Commissioner, Land - Records, Chhattisgarh, Raipur. ^ ^^^ VERSUS ^'1. State of Chhattisgarh, ,ov1 ^vV~ Through - The Secretary, ^ Department of Revenue, ^. Mantralaya, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur. The Commissioner, Land - Records, Chhattisgarh, H. Q. - Gandhi Chow^Raipur. ^3. The Collector (Land - Records), District - Raipur(C.G-) <^" Writ Petition^inder Article - 226/227 of the Constitution of India (2^U—^ HIQH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT_BILASPUR SB : HOK9BLS JUSTICB PRITINKBR DIWAKER W.P.jSl N0. 1451/2008 P3BT!TIONERS Wersus RESPONDENTS Doinar Siiigh Nirmalkax' '& Others State ofC.G & Ofh.ers ^^ WRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THB CONSTITUTION OF !NDIA Appearassee: Shri R.K.Kesai'wani, counsel for fhe petitiouers. Shri Shashaak Thakur, P.L. for fhe State. ORAL ORDBR (08.0T.2Q09) Challenge hi th.e present writ petition is to th-e order dated 30.1.2008 (Annexure P/ 1) passed by respondent No.2 whereby Uie petitioners have been transferred from the ofiice of the Commissioner, Land Recores, Chhattisgarh Raipur to the CoIiector(Laiid Records) District Kabeerdham m. violation of fl.ie ti'aiisfer policy. This Court entertaming the grievsjice of thepetitioners had graated stay in. his favour vide order dated 5.3.2008. lu view of the fa.et that this petition was filed 021 26.2.2008 aad stay was also granted iu favour of the petitiouers, the traiisfer order, so far a.s it relates to tlie petitioners is hereby quashed. However, the State GoveniBieiit would be at Hbert57 to pass ao. order if tiic adnimistrative exigency so warrajit. Wifh tlie above obseivation the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge