IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1802 of 2010 UMESH KUMAR SINGH S/O SRI SHYAM NARAYAN SINGH R/O VILL.- ARAK, P.O.- ARAK, P.S. KRISHNA BRAHAM, DISTT.- BUXAR (BIHAR) Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, POLICE DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUNGER RANGE, MUNGER 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MUNGER 6. THE CHAIRMAN, CONSTABLE SELECTION COMMITTEE, MUNGER RANGE, BOARD NO. 1, MUNGER ----------- 2. 5.8.2010 In absence of necessary assertion of facts in the writ petition, counsel for the petitioner prays for leave to withdraw the writ application to file a proper representation before the authorities. Only if the petitioner files a representation setting out full details with names of persons vis-à-vis whom he alleges discrimination in appointment when they have also secured 15 marks as him, as he claims, only in that event and not otherwise this Court requires the respondents to consider the representation and dispose off the same by a reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of eight weeks from the date of receipt and/or presentation of a copy of such representation. The application is dismissed as withdrawn. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)