IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN FRIDAY, THE 7TH DECEMBER 2007 / 16TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 SA.No. 521 of 1997 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN AS.47/1994 of SUB COURT, QUILANDY OS.288/1989 of MUNSIFF COURT, QUILANDY APPELLANT: APPELLANT: PLAINTIFF: NADUVILAKAN DY PATHUMMA, RESIDING AT THAYYULLATHIL AGED 42 YEARS, D/O.ASSANKUTTY IN NADUVANNUR AMSOM, AND KAKKANCHERY DESOM OF QUILANDY TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.SURESH KUMAR SRI.M.SREELATHA RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS: DEFENDANTS: 1. AAYARAMBATH AMMAD, RYOT, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O.ALIYUMMU IN NADUVANNOR AMSOM DESOM, QUILANDY TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 2. KALLUVEETTIL AYISHA UMMA, AGED 58 YEARS, D/O.ALIYAMMA RESIDING AT PUTHIYOTTIL HOUSE, KOTTOOR AMSOM, PALOLI DESOM OF QUILANDY TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 3. KALLUVEETTIL NAFEESSA UMMA, AGED 54 YEARS, D/O.ALIYUMMA, RESIDING AT THATTANKANDY HOUSE, THRIKKUTTISSERY AMSOM, DESOM, QUILANDY TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 4. KALLUVEETTIL UMMAYYA UMMA, AGED 55 YEARS, D/O.ALLIYAMMU, RESIDING AT CHEMBAKKASSERI HOUSE, BALUSSERY AMSOM, PUTHOORVATTAM DESOM, QUILANDY TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 5. PERUMBATHINKAL AMINA, AGED 53 YEARS, W/O.ALIYAMMU, NADUVANNOR AMSOM, KAKKANCHERY DESOM, QUILANDY TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 6. PERUMBATHINKAL KOYOTTY, RYOT, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O.ALIYAMMU IN NADUVANNOOR AMSOM AND KAKKACHERY DESOM, QUILANDY TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 7. PERUMBATHINKAL ATHRUMAN, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.ALIYAMMU IN NADUVANNUR AMSOM AND DESOM, QUILANDY TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.K.VENU NAYAR SRI.B.V.JOY SHANKAR THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ORDERS ON 07/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. -------------------------------------------- S.A.. NO. 521 OF 1997 D -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of December, 2007 JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the disputes between the parties have been settled out of Court and that it is not necessary to prosecute the Second Appeal further. He also submits that the Second Appeal may be dismissed as not pressed. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed as not pressed. (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/ K.T.SANKARAN, J. ---------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- S.A.NO. 521 OF 1997 D JUDGMENT 7th December, 2007 ----------------------------------------------------