IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.8113 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 14.12.2010 Shakuntla and others ....Petitioners Versus Presiding Officer & others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Manoj Chahal, Advocate for the petitioners. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. There is no legal infirmity in the impugned order. The petitioners claim themselves to be the successful bidders in the auction held under the orders of the Court on 29.10.2010. According to the terms of the auction the petitioners were required to deposit 75% of the balance amount after the fall of the hammer which was not done. The petitioners moved an application after one month of the auction seeking extension of time to deposit the remaining amount. There is a clear stipulation in the notice issued for auctioning the property that in the eventuality of a person not depositing the entire amount within 15 days of the date of auction the property shall be re- auctioned and a notice to this effect would be issued. There is thus no ambiguity or infirmity in the impugned order. The petitioners C.R.No.8113 of 2010 (O&M) -2- obviously are free to participate in the renewed auction. They cannot make a grievance of the adherence of the Court to the terms of the auction especially when they themselves have defaulted without any plausible explanation. No ground to interfere. Dismissed. 14.12.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss