IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 21ST JUNE 2011 / 31ST JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 16540 of 2011(N) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- V.KRISHNANKUTTY, KAPPIL HOUSE, TEEKOY ESTATE, TEEKOY P.O., KOTTAYAM-686 580, (HEAD CONSTABLE) ARMED RESERVE, IDUKKI (H C U 625) (RTD). BY ADVS. SRI.B.RAGUNATHAN SRI.R.SRINATH SRI.P.PRASANTH SRI.M.M.LALBIND SRI.VIPIN VARGHESE RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 010. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.SANDESH RAJA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss W.P.(C) NO.16540/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD. 14.12.2001 IN OP. NO.20428/1995. P2:- COPY OF THE GO(RT) 50/95/HOME DTD. 7.1.1995. P3:- COPY OF THE GO(RT) 551/2000 HOME DTD. 8.2.2000. P4:- COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. NIL. 8/2002 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P5:- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 15.3.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P6:- COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD. 25.5.2011 IN WPC. 12914/2011. P7:- COPY OF THE ORDER DGO 48/2011 NO.A3/88932/10 DTD. 17.1.2001 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P8:- COPY OF THE LETTER NO.A3/88932/10 DTD. 17.1.2011 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE IST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL:- TRUE COPY P.S. TO JUDGE tss S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 16540 of 2011 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 21st day of June, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner was recruited as a police constable in the III Battalion MSP formed in 1964. That battalion was disbanded in 1967 and the petitioner was absorbed in the CRPF. He was later discharged and re-enlisted in the MSP as police constable. Subsequently he was transferred and posted to Armed Reserve, Idukki. He has retired also. 2. The petitioner's grievance in this writ petition is that as per the Government orders on this subject, the entire period of service of the petitioner starting from 1964 is liable to be computed for the purpose of seniority and retirement benefits. The same has not been done. The petitioner submits that in identical cases, by Ext. P1 judgment and Exts.P2 to P4, P7 and P8 orders, similar reliefs have been granted to others. In the above circumstances, the petitioner has filed Ext. P5 representation before the 2nd respondent. The petitioner seeks a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider Ext. P5 representation in the light of Ext. P1 judgment and Exts.P2 to P4, P7 and P8 orders. 3. Having heard the learned Government Pleader also, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P5 representation filed by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. While doing so, the 2nd respondent shall consider the applicability of Ext. P1 judgment and Exts.P2 to P4, P7 and P8 orders. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition along with a certified of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/