IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Civil Revision No.6008 of 2008 (O&M) Decided on : March 24, 2009 Naresh ... Petitioner VERSUS Som Pal and others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Ravinder Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the respondents. A.N.JINDAL, J.- Heard. A perusal of the impugned order dated 21.10.2008 (Annexure P-10) reveals that the respondent – plaintiff Som Pal is not seeking any relief against the petitioner – applicant Naresh, who wants himself to be impleaded as party-defendant. Even otherwise, the plaintiff is the dominus litis of the suit. However, if the petitioner is found to be the necessary party, then the Trial Court will be at liberty to take adverse view against the plaintiff – respondent. With the above observations, this petition is dismissed. March 24, 2009 ( A.N.JINDAL ) `gian' JUDGE