IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH JANUARY 2011 / 22ND POUSHA 1932 RP.No. 443 of 1999(A) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 12/8/99 IN O.P.NO.20170/1999 REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ----------------------------------- ARJUNAN, S/O.CHELLAPPAN, MAILAKUZHI, PARUTHIKUNNUVILA VEEDU, VALIYA KATTAKKAL, MUDAKKAL MURI, NELLANADU VILLAGE, VENJARAMOODU, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. A. SURESH, DEVAKI NIVAS, APNDAKASALA, SARKARA, CHIRAYINKEEZHU, TRIVANDRUM. 2. SATHY, W/O.SIVADASAN, KUZHIVILAKATHU VEEDU, EDAKODU, CHIRAYINKEEZHU TALUK, TRIVANDRUM. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VENJARAMOODU POLICE STATION, TRIVANDRUM. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VENJARAMOODU POLICE STATION, TRIVANDRUM. 6. THE ASSISTANT EXCISE COMMISSIONER, TRIVANDRUM EXCISE DIVISION. TRIVANDRUM. 7. BABU ALIAS CHARAYAM BABU, S/O. GOPALAN, THAZHEVILA VEEDU,CHIRAKKOTTUKONAM VALIYA KATTAKKAL, MUDAKKAL, MELLANADU VILLAGE, VENJARAMOODU, TRIVANDRUM. 8. K. THULASEEDHARAN, S/O. KUTTAN, PULARI, MANIKKAL MURI, NELLANADU, VENJARAMOODU, TRIVANDRUM. sts RP.NO.443/1999 9. BABU, THUNDIL, MARUTHUR MADOM, PERUMBALATHU, MARUTHURKONAM, VALIYA KATTAKKAL, VENJARAMOODU, TRIVANDRUM. 10. SUKUMARAKKURUPPU, THRIVENI, ALAMTHARA MURI, MUDAKKAL, TRIVANDRUM. 11. MAKKARKONAM RAVI, MAKKAMKONAM VEEDU, CHAVADI NADA, MANIKKAL MURI, VENJARAMOODU, NELLANADU VILLAGE, TRIVANDRUM. 12. RAMANI.P. NAIR, NELLANADU PANCHAYAT MEMBER, NELLANADU, VENJARAMOODU, TRIVANDRUM. R3 R6 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts R.BASANT & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. *********************** C.M.P.No.52615 of 1999 & R.P No.443 of 1999 ***************************** Dated this the 12th day of January, 2011 ORDER/JUDGMENT BASANT, J. There is no representation for the the petitioner. C.M.P.No.52615 of 1999 is to condone the delay of 25 days in filing a review petition against a judgment rendered as early as on 12.08.1999. It appears to us that the licence issued in the matter for running the toddy shop must have expired long back and that the petitioner is unlikely to be interested in prosecuting these petitions now. The absence of the petitioner indicates that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting these petitions. 2. The petition for condonation of delay is dismissed. Consequently the review petition shall stand rejected as barred by limitation. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE) rtr/