THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S. APPA RAO C.M.A. No. 555 of 2011 Oral judgment: This C.M.A. is directed against the order dated 13.12.2010 passed by the I Additional District & Sessions Judge, Kurnool, in I.A. No.175 of 2010 in O.S. No. 9 of 2010, granting ad interim injunction as prayed for. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant-defendant Nos. 1, 3 to 5 and the learned counsel for respondent No.1-plaintiff and perused the order under appeal. It is the contention of the appellants as respondent No.1 failed to prove title to the suit schedule property, she is not entitled to grant of ad interim injunction. It is their further case that the Court below merely relying on the documents Exs. A1 to A9 filed by respondent No.1- plaintiff has granted ad interim injunction, and it failed failed to look into any of the documents filed by the appellants to show that the suit schedule property was not gifted to respondent No.1-plaintiff. The questions as to how respondent No.1-plaintiff got the suit schedule property and whether she has title to the suit schedule property are questions which have to be decided after full-fledged trial. The documents filed by respondent No.1-plaintiff, namely Exs. A3, A4, A5 and A6, namely pattadar pass book, title deed, R.O.R and Adangal, prima facie, show that respondent No.1-plaintiff is in possession. That being so, we find no reason whatsoever to interfere with the order under appeal passed by the Court below granting ad interim injunction upon satisfying for itself that respondent No.1-plaintiff has made out a prima facie case for grant of ad interim injunction. There is no merit in the C.M.A., and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ______________ N.V. RAMANA, J. ______________ K.S. APPA RAO, J. Dated: 28th June, 2011 KSR