V IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Transfer Petition ( C ) No. ^ Of2010 PETLTIQNER: ^' D' ^&$^ ^jy ^•'..'" ..-6" •S?'" .-!->••" 'sy RESPONDENT: /——— - Smt. Sangita Namdeo @ Yogita Namdeo W/o Mukesh Naindeo, aged about£2.years, Through Shri Chudamani S/o Bansilal Namdeo (Advocate), R/o Bhanu Pratap, Plot Madhuban-para, Raigarh, Tahsil and Disti-ict Raigarh (CG). Versus Mukesh Namdeo S/o Narmada Prasad Namdeo, aged about 37 years, R/o Rest House Road, Pendra Road, TahsU Pendra Road, District Bilaspur (CG). APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 24 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE , 1908 FOR TRANSFEROF THE CIVIL SUJT NO^<9-A/2009 (BETWEEN MUKESH NAMDEQ^VERSUS SMT. SANGITA (5), YOGITA NAMDEO) FROM THE COURT OF-^iDDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE PENDRA 'ROAD, DISTRICT BILASP^R TO THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE RAIGARH (CG)/ FAMILY COURT STl<-1 *ll 7=T •^I^K'I^, ®-nl'y'i6,(qwi+iy ^wvii ^w^-:^-f^---3y-h-----^ 200 3TI^?T 'T^T (t?ts°"^) wnm ^ifttf sm^t S.B. Hon'bie Shri Justice N.K. Afcarwa 15.04.2010 Shri Suryakant Mishra, Heard on admission. Aldvocate for the petitioner. This petition is filed undei Civil Suit No. 19-A/2009 pend Judge, Pendra Road, Distt. Judge, Raigarh. Learned counsel appeari with an intention to avoid respondent has filed an applii Marriage Act. The respondent under Section 125 of Cr.P.C payment of maintenance. Shn Mishra further bear the expenses of travelinc therefore, the case may be Additional District Judge, Pendi Raiaarh. The reasons submitted sufficient for transferring the ca^ concerned, the petitioner is <M<l[CT<Hl 'RTO^ff ^f 'fe1^ tl^R^R ^'sffinsn^r Section 24 of CPC for transfer of |ng before the Additional District iilaspur, to the court of District |ng for the petitioner submits that payment of maintenance, the tation under Section 9 of Hindu n6t complying the order passed in her favour and is avoidinfl 'jits that the petitioner is unable to f]rom Raigarh to Pendra Road, and transferred from the court of Ita Road to court of District Judae, biv the petitioner's counse! are not e. So far as traveling expenses is 'ntitled for filing an apptication WIS'QV VtSv'^llHM, >]»^->FTra-~['S;147—2/2010—1,00,000. .SHl^-li'* *11<* 's. Sahu 'S^! "l<l<41Cf<1, ©Tll'H'16,fslCII'Hy •Wl 200 3iI^¥I'V^V (l?t3qV!) wnw^tefan^i before the court for grant of suc^ have been raised. In view of above, the petiti| liable to be and is hereby dismis^ the trial court shall decide the c^ costs. +llicfl1-1 ^H<S ^I^S'C^K ^aifwTaii^r h expenses; No other grounds in being devoid of substance Is ;ed. However, it is directed that se expeditiousty. No order asto Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge