1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 179 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 150 OF 2008 Yunus Mullan Khan ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr.S.C. Kanojia for the Applicant. Mr.A.S. Shitole, APP for the State. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : APRIL 9, 2010 P.C. :- 1 Heard Counsel for the applicant and APP for the State. 2 The applicant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 366A of the IPC and under Section 372 read with 34 and is sentenced also under the PITA Act under Sections 4 and 5 and sentenced to suffer RI for 7 years on each count. 2 3 It is submitted that the applicant is in jail since 25.5.2006 and he has undergone about four years of actual sentence. 4 I have perused the judgment and order of the trial court and I have also gone through the evidence which is annexed to the appeal. In my view, there is sufficient material to show the involvement of the present applicant in the commission of the said offence. Hence, this is not a fit case for grant of bail. Application is rejected. 5 Appeal, however, is expedited. Place the appeal on the final hearing board on 28th June, 2010. Liberty, however, is granted to the applicant to apply for bail if the appeal is not heard, expeditiously. 6. Application is disposed of. (V.M. KANADE, J.)