IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 12TH MARCH 2009 / 21ST PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 3731 of 2009(T) -------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M/S.RELIANCE HYPER MART LIMITED, CHANDRIKA CHAMBERS, SA ROAD, VYTTILA, COCHIN - 19, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY C.S.ANIL KUMAR. BY ADV. MR.A.KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. MUVATTUPUZHA MUNICIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. MUVATTUPUZHA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN. ADV. MR.V.M.KURIAN FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.3731 OF 2009 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of March, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner challenged the order of the 1st respondent dated 14.10.2008, wherein the 1st respondent intimated the decision of the 2nd respondent refusing licence prayed for by the petitioner, before the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions. By Ext.P1 order, the Tribunal modified that decision directing grant of licence as prayed for by the petitioner and the Secretary of the Municipality was directed to issue the licence as prayed for within 15 days from the date of the order. That order is dated 14.1.2009. The respondents challenged Ext.P1 order in a writ petition before this Court which was also dismissed. It is under the above circumstances, the petitioner filed the original petition seeking a direction to the Secretary of the Municipality to implement Ext.P1. When this writ petition came up for admission, the Municipality took the stand that they had already filed an appeal against the judgment dismissing their writ petition. W.P.(c)No.3731/09 2 2. Today, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the Municipality that the writ appeal filed by the Municipality has been dismissed. Therefore, the respondents cannot raise any further objection in complying with Ext.P1 order of the Tribunal. Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed and the respondents are directed to comply with Ext.P1 order by issuing the licence as prayed for by the petitioner within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd W.P.(c)No.3731/09 3