IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP Nos. 4389, 4390, 4490 and 4492 of 2011 Decided on: 14th June, 2011. 1. CWP No. 4389 of 2011 Parma Nand Vs. State of H.P. and others 2. CWP No. 4390 of 2011 Geeta Devi Vs. State of H.P. and others 3. CWP No. 4490 of 2011 Roop Singh and others Vs. State of H.P. and others 4. CWP No. 4492 of 2011 Kamla Devi and another Vs. State of H.P. and others Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG for respondents. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the cases are squarely covered by the decision of the Apex Court in Mool Raj Upadhyaya vs. State of H.P., 1994 Supp. (2) SCC 316. 2. Learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. Petitioners submit that they would file appropriate 2 representations furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for them to do so. Thereafter, the matter will be duly considered by the second respondent in the light of the judgment, referred to above and appropriate action in accordance with law will be taken within another four months from the date of receipt of the representations along with a copy of this judgment and the copy of the judgment, referred to above by the petitioner concerned. 3. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 14th June, 2011. (Justice Sanjay Karol), (K/vt) Judge. 3 (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 14th June, 2011. (Justice Sanjay Karol), (K/vt) Judge.