1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1869 OF 2006 Bharat Petroleum Technical and Non-technical Employees Association... Petitioner Vs. Bahrat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. ... Respondents Mr. S.S. Pakale for Petitioner. Mr. J.P. Cama with Mr. Ganesh Shetty i/by Crawford Bayley & Co. for Respondents. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED: AUGUST 22, 2006 DATED: AUGUST 22, 2006 DATED: AUGUST 22, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . If according to the Petitioner, there is breach of Section 9A of the I.D. Act, it will be open to them to take such steps in law to which they are entitled to. It is pointed out that the Petitioner has already before the Conciliation Officer. If that be so, this is not a fit case for this court to exercise its extra ordinary jurisdiction. Hence, Petition disposed off. . The Conciliation Officer is directed to dispose of the Petitioner’s representation at the earliest. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)