C.R.No.6834 of 2008 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.6834 of 2008 Date of decision : 9.12.2008 Mawasi Ram ...Petitioner Versus Ansal Buildwell Ltd. ......Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER ..... Present : Mr. Gurinder Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. MAHESH GROVER, J.(Oral) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 2.6.2008 by which the evidence of the petitioner, who is a workman, has been ordered to be closed. Learned counsel for the petitioner while assailing the aforesaid order has contended that if one opportunity is granted to him, he shall adduce his entire evidence. He further contended that he is not at fault as his cross-examination was deferred and it is only because of the absence of the letter of authority in favour of Mr. P.R.Yadav, the counsel appearing for the respondent – management that the matter was being adjourned. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the revision petition can be disposed of at this stage without issuance of notice of motion, as resorting to this process is likely to delay the proceedings further. C.R.No.6834 of 2008 -2- After the perusal of the paper-book in which the last three zimni orders have been produced, I am of the opinion that the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is not misplaced. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 2.6.2008 is set aside and it is directed that the petitioner shall be granted one effective opportunity to adduce his entire evidence. Disposed of. 9.12.2008 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss