IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.CHELAMESWAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN THURSDAY, THE 20TH MAY 2010 / 30TH VAISAKHA 1932 WA.No. 719 of 2010 -------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN WPC.7167/2010 DATED 09/03/2010 .................... APPELLANT/6TH RESPONDENT: ---------------------------------- BALASUBRAMANYAN, S/O.V.R. VASU, AGD 38 YEARS, VETTIYATTIL HOUSE, VATTANATHIRA POSE, AMBALLUR. BY ADV. SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.RENJITH B.MARAR SRI.L.RAJESH NARAYAN SMT.LAKSHMI.N.KAIMAL RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS: --------------------------------------------------- 1. M/S. ERAM PROPERTY NETWORK PVT. LTD., 94/1, TRICHI ROAD, CHINTHAMANIPUDUR P.O., COIMBATORE, TAMIL NADU, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY KABEER AHMED HAJI. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, RDO'S OFFICE, COLLECTORATE, THRISSUR. 3. THE PUTHUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT, THRISSUR, PIN - 680 014, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY(REVENUE DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 5. JOHNY VARGHESE, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O. VARGHESE, ZION VILLA, THYKATTUSERRY, OLLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. WA.No. 719 of 2010 6. RAJU PUZHANKARA, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O. SANKARANARAYANA MENON, HARVIN PLAZA, KALOOR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. R1 BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM R2 & R4 BY SENIOR GOVT. PLEADER, SMT. K. MEERA. R5 & R6 BY ADV. SRI. BINOY VASUDEVAN THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/05/2010, ALONG WITH WA NO. 720 OF 2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J.Chelameswar, C.J. & P.N.Ravindran, J. ------------------------------------------ W.A.Nos.719 & 720 of 2010 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 20th day of May, 2010 JUDGMENT J.Chelameswar, C.J. W.A.No.719 of 2010 is preferred by the 6th respondent aggrieved by the order dated 9th March, 2010 passed in W.P.(C) No.7167 of 2010 by which an interim order limited for a period of one month was granted in favour of the writ petitioner with a further observation that any construction made by the petitioner, legality of which is in issue in the writ petition, shall be subject to the result of the writ petition. 2. Having heard Sri.V.Chitambaresh, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant and Sri.George Poonthottam, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner/first respondent herein and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, we dispose of the writ appeal directing that the writ petition itself be heard on 24th May, 2010. Registry is, therefore, directed to list W.A.Nos.719 & 720 of 2010 - 2 - the writ petition for hearing before the appropriate Bench on 24th May, 2010. 3. W.A.No.720 of 2010 is preferred by respondents 4 and 5 in the abovementioned writ petition. For the reasons assigned for disposing of W.A.No.719 of 2010, the present writ appeal is also disposed of with a similar direction. J.Chelameswar, Chief Justice P.N.Ravindran, Judge vns