IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 30TH AUGUST 2010 / 8TH BHADRA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 762 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.9671/2010 .................... PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER: ------------------------------------- K.SETHUKUMAR, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O.K.K.UNNITHAN, KALLUVATHIL VEEDU, PALLICKAL VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.K.MADHUSOODHANAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S)/1ST RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------------------ RAJASENAN NAIR, AGE &FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY, PALLICKAL GRAMA PANCHAYAT, PAZHAKULAM.P.O., ADOOR-691523. ADV. SRI. K.SHAJ SRI.SAJJU.S THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ Cont.Case (Civil) NO. 762 OF 2010 (S) ========================== Dated this the 30th day of August, 2010 J U D G M E N T Although in purported compliance of Annexure 2 judgment, Ext.R1(a) order has been passed by the Panchayat, admittedly, the said order was passed without issuing notice to the petitioner or hearing him. Therefore, the said order cannot be said to be in full compliance with the directions of this Court. When this difficultly was realised, counsel for the Panchayat undertakes that the matter will be considered afresh with notice to the petitioner and fresh orders will be passed. It is undertaken that the said process will be completed within 4 weeks from today. The aforesaid submission is recorded. The contempt petition is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp