IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.3682 of 2011 ==================================================== NAGENDRA @ NAGENDRA PRADHAN SON OF LATE SHEODAS PRADHAN RESIDENT PRASAGANDA, P.S. SIKRAUL, BUXAR AT PRESENT JUNIOR ENGINEER, RURAL WORKS DEPARTMENT, WORKS DIVISION NO. 2, PATNA. - Petitioner/s(s) Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS - Respondent/s(s) ------- 2 13/07/2011 Annexure-1 is the second show cause issued to the petitioner. He has rushed to the High Court by filing this writ application challenging the said notice on the ground that the petitioner has been harping on production of certain evidence and documents to effectively launch his defence but the respondents are refusing to oblige and they are pushing ahead with the departmental enquiry. If no documents are being furnished to the petitioner despite such demands being bona fide and those documents being readily available, then advantages or disadvantages thereof either for or against will follow provided the disciplinary authority decides to impose some punishment upon the petitioner at the end of the - 2 - proceeding. There are judgments one to many on the issue of furnishing or non furnishing of evidence and documents in matters of domestic enquiry. Therefore, all those aspects will be available to the petitioner when the occasion arises. But the Court is not inclined to de-rail the proceeding on those aspects of the matter by interfering in the writ application at this stage. Petitioner is not denuded of his right but no interference is required by the Court now. This writ application is dismissed. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)