HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.4240 of 2010 ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a declaration by way of Mandamus to declare the inaction of the respondents in not reinstating the petitioner as Anganwadi worker of Chennarayunipalli Vilalge, Yerragondapalem Mandal, Prakasam District pursuant to her appointment as illegal and arbitrary. It appears, in the selections that took place in the year 2008 for the post of Anganwadi worker of Chennarayunipalli Village, Yerragondapalem Mandal, Prakasam District, the petitioner was appointed as Anganwadi worker. While so, one Smt. K. Subbalakshmi has filed Writ Petition No. 20464 of 2008 before this Court questioning the appointment of the petitioner as Anganwadi worker mainly on the ground that she was more qualified than the petitioner. Through order dated 19.12.2008, this Court while setting aside the appointment of the petitioner herein as Anganwadi Worker of Chennarayanipalli Village, has directed the respondents 1 to 3 therein, to consider the case of the said Subbalakshmi for the said post. Pursuant to the orders passed in the aforesaid writ petition, Smt. Subbalakshmi, the writ petitioner therein, was appointed as Anganwadi worker. Thereafter, the petitioner lodged a complaint with the Project Director, District Women and Child Development Agency, Ongole, stating that the Matriculation Certificate produced by Smt. Subbalaksmi is a false one. Along with the said complaint, the petitioner has also produced a certification to that effect from the Registrar of the Andhra University. Thereafter, the petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 26844 of 2008 before this Court challenging the appointment of the said Subbalakshmi as Anganwadi worker. Subsequently, through proceedigns dated 8.12.2009, the Project Director, District Selection Committee (Anganwadi worker) Ongole, the 2nd respondent herein, has removed the said Subbalakshmi from service on the ground that the educational certificates produced by her were not genuine. Basing on the aforesaid orders of the 2nd respondent, dated 8.12.2009, this Court disposed of Writ Petition No. 26844 of 2009 filed by the petitioner on the ground that no further enquiry is required to be made in the matter. Thereafter, the petitioner herein filed a representation dated 8.1.2010 before the respondents seeking to reinstate him into service. The grievance of the petitioner is that in spite of making such a representation, the respondents are not taking any steps for reinstating her into service. Hence, she filed the present writ petition. It is to be noted that the appointment of the petitioner has already been set aside by this Court in Wit Petition No. 20464 of 2008 and the said order has become final. Further, it is also seen from the record that the respondents have removed Smt. Subbalakshmi, who was appointed in place of the petitioner, on the ground that the Matriculation Certificate produced by her was not genuine. If the petitioner wants herself to be reinstated into service as a consequence of removal of the said Subbalakshmi, the appropriate course for the petitioner is to seek review of the order passed in Writ Petition No. 20464 of 2008 and she cannot file another writ petition for that purpose. While leaving it open to the petitioner to take appropriate steps for revival of her appointment order, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY,J Date: 17th March, 2010 pnb