IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 1ST OCTOBER 2010 / 9TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 30262 of 2010(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. NIKHIL CHANDRAN K., S/O.K.CHANDRAN AGED 22 YEARS, NELLIKKAL HOUSE, MOODAL, KUTTIPPURAM P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. DEEPAK P., NALINI NIVAS, RAM MANDIR ROAD, WADAKKANCHERY P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.MADHU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. SC SRI. P.C. SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.30262 OF 2010(G) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the Ist day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the 6th Semester examination was declared, they had failed in the subject Dynamics of Machinery. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 6 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :