1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 96 OF 2009 Dnyandeo Wasudeorao Thakre Vs. Mutthukrishnan Shankarnarayan Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Shri A. R. Ingole Adv for petitioner. Shri J. B. Kasat Adv for respondent. CORAM: C. L. PANGARKAR J. Dated: 6 th NOVEMBER, 2009. Heard counsel for the applicant and the non applicant. The applicant had instituted a Writ Petition No. 3952 of 2008. The petitioner had made a request for transfer and he had therefore submitted a representation to that effect to the non applicant. Said representation was not decided and therefore Writ Petition was filed. This Court by order dated 16.09.2008 directed the respondent therein to consider the representation of the petitioner. Respondent’s counsel has placed before me the reply stating therein that the petitioner’s representation has been 2 considered and the documents have been placed before the Court showing that matter was consider by the Chief Executive officer of the Zilla Parishad and it was found that plaintiff was in fact not eligible for being transferred since he had not completed the tenure at Dharni. Only direction that was given by this Court was to consider the representation made by the petitioner. Said representation is considered and decision thereon has been taken. Order therefore stands confirmed. Notice of contempt therefore stands discharged. Petitioner is at liberty to move appropriate forum for appropriate relief. JUDGE svk 3 4 5