IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND JULY 2009 / 31ST ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 20473 of 2009(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- EBIN P.ELDHO, S/O.ELDO, AGED 22 YEARS, RESIDING AT POKKAYIL HOUSE, MATHIRAPILLY, KOTHAMANGALAM P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.MADHU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY SC SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).20473/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioner was a student of Nehru College of Engineering and Research Centre, Pampady for B.Tech Electronics and Communication Engineering Degree Course for the academic year 2005-09. Apparently dissatisfied with the marks obtained in two papers in the 3rd and 4th semester supplementary examination, and one paper each in the 6th semester supplementary examination and 7th semester regular examination, he had applied for revaluation. He is aggrieved that the result of the revaluation has not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of the 3rd, 4th & 6th semester B.Tech supplementary Examination and 7th semester regular examination. Exts.P1 to P4 application for revaluation are pending before the respondents. W.P.(C).20473/09 2 3. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to publish the results of the revaluation sought for by the petitioner, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment provided the applications for revaluation are in order and otherwise correct. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs