IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 3RD AUGUST 2009 / 12TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 21881 of 2009(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- C.T.KAMALAKSHI AMMA, AGED 61 YEARS, W/O.LATE EVM SREEDHARAN, RAJEEV MANDIR, CHERUTHAZHAM, KOVVAL, P.O.MANDOOR, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.BABU SRI.M.C.BIJU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, CHERUTHAZHAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MANDOOR P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. SARALA.C., W/O.CHATHU NAMBIAR, AGED 60 YEARS, CHEMMANCHERI HOUSE, CHERUTHAZHAM, P.O.MANDOOR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.21881 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of August, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner faces Ext.P6 which is issued rejecting her application for permission to construct a compound wall and also requiring her to demolish the construction. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader and dispensing with issuance of notice to the respondents, preserving their right to move for re-hearing of this writ petition, if aggrieved by the order herein, it is directed that the first respondent will take up any reply of the petitioner to Ext.P6, hear on it and pass appropriate orders, if such objections are filed within a period of one week from now. The operation of Ext.P6 will stand suspended till the Panchayat issues such decision. Whatever be the decision of the Panchayat, the reasons thereof shall be stated therein so that the petitioner, if aggrieved, can pursue statutory remedies. Let the aforesaid be done untrammelled by anything stated in this judgment. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.3/8.