IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3862 of 2011 1. PRAKASH RAI SON OF LATE RAJENDRA RAI 2. JAI KISHORE RAI SON OF LATE RAM BALI RAI BOTH R/O VILL-NAYA TOLA RAHIMPUR P.S. MUFFASIL, DIST. KHAGARIA --- PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,DEPTATMENT OF LAND AND REVENUE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 2. THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, MUNGER 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KHAGARIA 4. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND REVENUE KHAGARIA 5. THE CIRCLE OFFICER, KHAGARIA 6. JICHCHU CHOUDHARY 7. SUBASH CHOUDHARY BOTH SONS OF LATE DASHRATH CHAUDHARY R/O VILL. RAHIMPUR, NAYATOLA P.S. & DIST. KHAGARIA --- RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02 07.03.2011 Heard both sides. Petitioners are aggrieved by order dated 28.08.2006 passed by respondent Collector in Misc. case no. 03 of 2003-04 whereby exercising its revisional jurisdiction under Section 16 of the Bihar Tenants Holding (Maintenance of Records) Act 1973, the respondent Collector has approved the recommendation of the respondent Anchal Adhikari for cancellation of Jamabandi no. 1144 created in the name of the writ petitioners. The matter concerns mutation. It is settled law that mutation neither creates nor extinguishes title. Learned counsel for the petitioners has not been able to show any jurisdictional and /or procedural error in the order. In that view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to 2 interfere with the said order by invocation of its extra ordinary writ jurisdiction. However, it is clarified that any finding touching the title over the land made or recorded in the order impugned shall not prejudice the petitioners in case they approach the competent Court of civil jurisdiction for ventilation/redressal of their grievance(s). Application is dismissed. Sym/ ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)