CLCON No. 17 of 2009 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. Case called out twice. None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner before the Court to argue the case. Sri N.P. Shah, learned Standing Counsel for the State/respondents. The respondent No. 2 has filed the affidavit of compliance and in paragraph No. 6 of the same, it has been stated that vide order dated 28.03.2009, the earlier order dated 28.06.2008 in respect of the petitioner has been stated subject to the decision in the writ petition No. 833 (S/S) of 2008. The order dated 28.03.2009 has been annexed as annexure No. 2 to the affidavit of compliance. In view of the above, I do not find any justification to continue the proceedings under the Contempt of Court Act against the respondents furthermore. Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed. Notices issued against the respondents are hereby discharged. (B.C.K., J.) 29.04.2009 ASWAL