IN THE MADHYA PRADE$H ADMINIETRA‘PIVE TRIBUNAL AT JABALFU o.A.No. v ‘ %\ ‘\$L‘ 9,) OF 1993 ww?;&1éb‘$° n #6 ’ g / § F APPLICANI‘S a 1. chatur Singh son of shri Demath f $ingha'3! aged about 41 years$$ 1 Assistant Teacher” mimary schoali/ Irikpalg‘é Block Officq Tokapa1.g District: Bastar.;(M.9.) v V1 Bithalu Ram Kashyap son of Shri Mitthuram‘ Kashyapg agaé about 42 yearw Assistant Teachergv Prathamik Shalagcmitka Gudad? (Rajoor) ,‘ Block 0f£ice Tokapa1,piatrict: Bastari(M.P.)o ‘_ - VERSU$ - REs§0NDENTs state cf Madhya Pradesh through 1. Secretaryg’ schobl ~ Education, BHGPAL. (M.P.) . 2. Jaint Director¢ Lek shikshan. Bastar Divi sion. JAGDALPUR. 3‘1 Dy.Director.f Lek Shikshanii _ Education District s JAGDALPUR (M.P.) . ' APFLICATION UNDER sECTIoN 19 ox Tim ADMINIsmATIVE‘ mmumn _ '; ACT, 1935. ¥ 7' EIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 768 of2005 A13PLICANTS Chatur Singh & another. VERSUS Staie ofMadhya Fradesh & Others. APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE RES?ONDENTS N TRIBUNAL ACT. 1985 M SB: Han’ble Shri Satish K. Atmimm'i. J. Present: Shri V Shri Sudeep Agawal, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Smita Ghai, Pansi Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on O8 day 0f0ct0ber, 2009) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instruction. submits that the petitioners are Hot interested in pursuing the matter angias such, me petitioners may be permitied to Withéraw this peiition. Leamed counsel appearing for other side has no objection. It is ordered i as prayezi for. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. A ”7i i ‘M f . / a af‘- . . Sd/‘ _ i I: Z Satish K. Agmhmrl ”WAM, - , ? " Judge i Amit