IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 23RD JANUARY 2009 / 3RD MAGHA 1930 RP.No. 1071 of 2008(W) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.10064/2008 Dated 09/07/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC. ---------------------------------------------------------- THE MUNCIPAL SECRETARY, CHENGANNUR MUNCIPALITY, CHENGANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.S.HARIKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT IN THE WPC. ------------------------------------------------ M.NOORJAHAN, (RETIRED U.D. CLERK, CHENGANNUR MUNCIPALITY), RESIDING AT RAINBOW, NEAR PRANAVAM THEATRE, KOLLAM. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- R.P.1071/2008 in W.P.(C).10064/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of January, 2009 ORDER Heard learned counsel for the review petitioner and learned counsel for the writ petitioner. 2. I do not find any grounds to review the judgment. Petition for review has been filed with specific reference to Annexure-A2. Annexure-A2 is dated 1.7.2008 and as rightly pointed out by the learned counsel for the writ petitioner, the petitioner retired from service on 31.5.2003. It is not clear whether the petitioner had executed any agreement with the Coastal Urban Co-operative Bank agreeing for recovery of any amounts due to the Bank from the retirement benefits available to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that at any rate, the liability due to the said Bank has been discharged. 3. In the circumstances, I do not think that the R.P.1071/2008 2 Municipality should be afforded any further time to conduct an enquiry or take any steps merely on the basis of Annexure-A2 and A3. I do not find any grounds to review the judgment. Accordingly, Review Petition is dismissed. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs