IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.890 of 2002 ================================================== Saryu Singh, son of Late Deo Narayan Singh, resident of village- Sharifa Pahari, P.S.-Islampur, District- Nalanda, at present village- Dulla Bigha, P.S.-Khirjersarai, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Uday Singh, son of Deni Singh, resident of village-Dulla Bigha, P.S.-Khijersarai, District- Gaya .... .... Opposite Parties ================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Paras Nath, Advocate. For the O.P.No.2 : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Sah, Advocate For the State : Mr. A.M.P. Mehta, A.P.P. ================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL) Amaresh Kumar Lal, J. The informant petitioner has preferred this revision application against the judgment and order dated 29.06.2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.II, Gaya in S.T.No.7/2001/402/1999 by which the accused opposite party no.2 has been acquitted for the charge under Sections 302/34 and 358 of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Patna High Court CR. REV. No.890 of 2002 dt.15-12-2011 2 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the opposite parties and perused the records. It appears from the impugned judgment that the learned trial court has considered the prosecution evidence as well as the defence evidence and has come to the conclusion that the prosecution has not succeeded in proving the charges against the accused beyond all shadow of doubts. Accordingly, the accused has been acquitted. In view of the decision in the case of Mahendra Pratap Singh Vs. Sarju Singh and another reported in AIR 1968 SC 707, I do not find any manifest illegality or the gross miscarriage of justice. The view taken by the learned trial court is also a probable view. Considering the facts and circumstances stated above, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. This petition is dismissed. Patna High Court, Patna Dated, the 15th of December, 2011 N.A.F.R./V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)