IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 13TH JUNE 2011 / 23RD JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 15693 of 2011(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. N.HARISARMA, S/O. NEELA KANDAN UNNI, AGED 42, UNNI MADOM, MANNAR. 2. T.JAYAPRAKASH, S/O. V.S.THANKAPPAN, AGED 42, OMKARAM, KADAPRA, MANNAR. 3. K.R.RAJESH KUMAR, AGED 29, S/O. P.K.RAJASEKHARAN PILLAI, KARAVATTATH, PARUMALA. 4. G.HARIKUMAR, S/O. A.GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR, MAPPALLIL HOUSE, VISHAVARSSERIKKARA, MANNAR. 5. A.V.AJITHKUMAR, S/O. VASUDEVA PANICKER, AZHAKIYA KAVIL PADINJARETHIL, KALLISSERY. 6. K.RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR, S/O. KUTTAN PILLAI, NARAYANA VALLOOR, CHENNITHALA, MAVELIKKARA. 7. VIJAYAMMA, W/O. LATE RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, CHANDRAVANAM, KURATHIKKADU, MANNAR. 8. P.G.MANIKKUTTAN, S/O. M.K.GOPALAN NAIR, PANDIYATH HOUSE, THIRUVAN, VANDOOR. 9. M.V.GIRISH, S/O. VASUDEVAN NAMBOOTHIRI, MOOTHEDATH ILLOM, KAVIYOOR, THIRUVALLA. 10. C.K.KRISHNAN NAMBOOTHIRI, S/O. KRISHNAN NAMBOOTHIRI, CHERUTHALA MADOM, CHERUKOLE, MAVELIKKARA. BY ADV. SRI.C.S.MANILAL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, NANTHENCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, NANTHENCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE ASSISTANT DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, THIRUVALLA GROUP, THIRUVALLA. ADV.G.BIJU, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No. 15693 of 2011 ================== Dated this the 13th day of June, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioners are temple employees in different cadres working in the Sri Thrikoratty Mahadeva Temple under Thiruvalla Group of Travancore Devaswom Board. On certain allegations against the melsanthi of the temple, the 3rd respondent submitted a report, based on which, all the temple employees of that group were transferred. Against the same, the petitioners have filed Ext.P4 representation before the 2nd respondent. The petitioners seek a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 expeditiously. Having heard the learned Standing Counsel for the Devaswom Board also, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the 1st petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. It would be open to the petitioners to supplement Ext.P4 by filing appropriate pleadings. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2