1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Civil Appln. (cao) No. 1414 Of 2010 (In MCA St. 6427/10 in FA St. No. 6424/10) Smt. Lata w/o Anilsingh Pawar ...Versus... Union of India & anr. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. M.W. Harsulkar Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Agrawal Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mrs. Deshmukh, AGP, for Respondent no.2. ... CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 19.04.2011. Heard. This is an application for condonation of delay of 880 days. Undoubtedly, the delay caused is huge in filing the present appeal. However, out of 880 days, major time has been spent since the applicant had filed Appeal against Order in this Court. Mr.Agrawal, learned counsel for respondent no.1, opposed the application on the ground that the remaining period has not been explained properly, to which Mr.Harsulkar pointed out that the applicant had gone on pilgrimage for one year. Taking into consideration the fact that the son of the applicant has died in Railway 2 accident and further fact that no interest is payable on the amount of compensation by the railways and in view of beneficial nature of legislation, in my opinion, it would be appropriate to condone the delay. Hence, delay is condoned. C.A. disposed of. Judge /TA/