THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.8838 of 2010 Date : 24-8-2010 Between: Tangallapally Abhinav S/o.T.Nagarjuna Chary .. Petitioner And Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Open University, represented by its Registrar, Road No.46, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad and another .. Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Sri J.Ugranarsimha Counsel for respondents : Sri M.Ratna Reddy The Court made the following : ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed against the inaction of the respondents in issuing memorandum of marks certificate and migration certificate consequent on the petitioner completing B.Sc. (MPC) Degree course in the 1st respondent University as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner sought consequential direction to the respondents to issue the memorandum of marks and migration certificates. Heard Sri J.Ugranarasimha, the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. The petitioner pleaded that he studied B.Sc. (MPC) course in the 1st respondent-University from 2006 to 2009 with Admission No.11106- 64469. After completion of the course, the petitioner is stated to have appeared for the final examinations. The petitioner has filed a duplicate memorandum of marks list of the B.Sc. course. His grievance is that though he has applied for original memorandum of marks, transfer and migration certificates by paying the requisite fee on 10-3-2010 so far the same have not been supplied to him. He has therefore instituted the present Writ Petition. At the hearing, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that in one of the subjects i.e., 11-Maths, the petitioner has secured cent percent marks in theory and that this has aroused some suspicion in the respondents. He has stated that presently they are examining the issue and as soon as they complete the verification, the respondents will issue the memorandum of marks and other certificates asked for by the petitioner. It is not the pleaded case of the respondents that so far any formal enquiry has been initiated against the petitioner. While it is always open to the respondents to make appropriate enquiry, they cannot withhold the certificates to the petitioner for unreasonably longer periods in the name of verification or pendency of enquiry. The respondents are therefore directed to expedite the verification/enquiry if any, to be held against the petitioner and take a decision after giving opportunity to the petitioner on the genuineness or otherwise of the marks obtained by him. After completing this process within a period of two months, the respondents shall consider the petitioner’s request for supply of the marks sheet and other certificates, subject to the decision taken by them. Subject to the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. ________________________ Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Date : 24-8-2010 AM