W x \ * HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (CI NO. 7246 OF 2008 Ajay Kumar Chhedaiyya, S/o Shri Puran Kumar Chhedaiyya, aged about 24 years, Caste Kandra, Camp~1, Bhilai. Tehsil and District Durg (CG). Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribe Welfare Department; DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). RESPONDEgT§ Secretary, Schedule Caste 8: Schedule Tribe Research and Training lnstitution (Adim Jati Evam Janjati Anusandhan Evam Prashikshan Sanshan) State of Chhattisgarh, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla Vishwavidyalaya Premises, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). 3. High Power Caste Scrutiny Committee, through the Director, Adim Jati Evam Janjati Anusandhan Evam Prashikshan Sanshan, State of Chhattisgarh, Pt. Ravlshankar Shukla Vishwavidyalaya Premises. Raipur (Chhattisgarh). 4. Sub Divisional Officer, Chhawani, Distt. Durg (CG). 5. Collector, District Durg (CG). 6. insurance Medical Officer, Directorate of State Employees Insurance Services, 0-290/5 Tagore Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (CG). (Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Smt. Fourzia Mirza, counsei for the petitioner. Shri A.S. Kachhawaha, Dy. Advocate General for the State/respondents No.1 to 5. ORAL ORDER . (Passed on this 6‘“ day of January, 2009) \ \ / / \ With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the patties, the petition is heard fmaliy. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was called for interview for the post of Dresser in the Employees State Insurance Corporation and after clearing the interview process the petitioner was required to produce the caste vermoation certificate for which he approached the respondent No.3lHigh Power Caste Scrutiny Committee (for short “the Committee”) for requisite application form, but the same has not been issued to him by the Committee. The petitioner prays that the concerned authority may be directed to issue the application form for verification of his caste certificate issued by the Sub Divisional‘ Officer. 3) Per contra, learned counsels appearing for the State submits that the only grievance of the petitioner that the petitioner was not given application form seeking verification of the permanent caste certificate issued by the competent authority. Leamed counsel submits that whosoever approaches the Committee, the Committee provided the application form. Shri Kachhawaha further submits that in the event the petitioner approaches the Committee for application form, the same shall be provided to him and appropriate action will be taken, in accordance with iaw. 4) In 'view of the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the State, according to learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 5) Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Gowri 6) Consequently, i.A.Nos;1 8. 2 also standdisposed of‘ Sdl- i .Satish K. Agnihouii Judge W t