-'' ^.r ^...l^ 4 ^ ^) BEFORE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH Writ Petition No./^^:^.../2004 i ^ r^ logie ts?3ncli Petitioner Respondent :- ^\^^?-' ^9 ..^ -y ^^' Satish Kumar Roy S/o Asharfi Lal Roy aged about 39 years, Assistant Teacher of Govt. Middle School, Hardi Nawagarh R/o Nawagarh Distt.Durg (C.G.) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary, School Education, Mantralaya - Raipur (C.G.) District Education OfiScer, Bemetara WRIT PETITION U/ARTICLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ .L. The Petitioner, named above, humbly and respectfally begs to submit as under :- XI-HC-22 ^^ ~^ll<4ld<4, ^^^<o, fG«n^l< 3T1^FT'^T [^rl[<=b <3Tl|!^T 5b^i<=n <rif^a ^ y ^^ ^M^I $h^lch 3^?T 49|cb ^.^.^..2-3.8.0.......^ ^ •^^T' W^T ^«ii<y<<ii^a ^rf^ 03/09/A004: - Shri Ashok Varma, counsel for th^ Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Advocat^ Yashwant Thakur,G.A., Shri Satish GLJpta, Dy.G.A., Shri Akhi! Agrawal and Shri tate/respondents. lowed. Sandeep Dubey, Pane! Lawyers, for the Application for urgent hearingis a| Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner| the petitioner. He further submits that for|the present the petitioner may be given an opportunjty of filing the detailed represen respondents, which shall be considered c|n its own merits in accordance with law. Having heard and considered th opinion on the merits.of the case, in the c|pinion of this Couri: ends ofjustice would be sen^ed if a direction is given to the petitioi copy of the petition and this order; within made; the competent authority of the n same on its ov^/n merits in accordance wi' six weeks from the date of receipt of the n or guidelines is brought to the notice, the the remedy avaiiable under the law, !t is] available under the iaw. With the aforesaid obsen/ations, ttl Consequentiy, M.W.P., ifany, starjids disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. Copy to State counsei for comptiaijice. chl^{d4tt1 'RTR^ff ^ t^t iF^l^K ^T 3?rf^R 3?T^T petitioner. v Generai, with Shri U.N.S. Deo, G.A-, Shri ^ubmits that the matter relates to transfer of ation before the Competent Authority of the rivaf contentions, without expressing any er to make a detailed representation raising his grievance before the State/Competer|t Authority of the respondents atong with a (en days, and on such representation being ^spondents shalt consider and decide the |h lavyr as eariy as possible, preferabiy within ^presentation. tf any contraventson of policy Isame be considered on its own merits. Learned counsel for the petitiojier prays that after the decision of the representation, if any grievance of the p^titioner remains he may be aitowed to avail open to the petitioner to avail the remedy is petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge