IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 21 OF 2000 AJIT M. SAKHARDANDE ....Appellant Versus SMT.LEENA SAKHARDANDE ....Respondent Smt. A.A. Agni, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. J.P. Mulgaonkar, Advocate for the Respondent. Coram:- SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J. Date:- 23rd June, 2006 P.C.: This Appeal from Order arises out of an application for interim relief and temporary injunction filed by the appellant/father. By the impugned order the appellant's application for interim relief directing the respondent/wife to hand over the custody of the minor child to the appellant was dismissed. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the appellant states that the appellant has no objection if the custody of the child is continued with the mother. The child is at present staying with the mother at Sawantwadi. In the circumstances, by consent of the parties the present Appeal from Order can be disposed of by passing the following Order :- O R D E R 3. The appellant can meet child Gaurav who is presently staying at Sawantwadi with the respondent/mother on any day by prior intimation to the respondent/mother and as per the convenience of Gaurav. Learned counsel for the appellant states that Gaurav may be allowed to spend some time with the appellant during vacation. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to this. Hence during vacation the appellant can, by prior intimation to the respondent and as per the convenience of Gaurav, bring him to Panaji. Gaurav will decide how much time he wants to spend with the appellant. Appeal from order is disposed of in the aforestated terms. SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J. sl.