IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 4393 of 2005. Date of Decision: 22nd April, 2009. Vidya Devi & Ors. ....Petitioners through Mr. D.K.Syal, Advocate Versus M/s New Age Infosolution Pvt. Ltd....Respondent through None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL) The petitioner/plaintiffs filed a civil suit for Permanent Injunction claiming themselves to be owners in possession to the extent of 1/3rd share in the subject land, in relation to which the partition proceedings were statedly pending before the Assistant Collector 1st Grade. The petitioners also moved an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC which was allowed by learned Civil Judge [Senior Division], Gurgaon vide order dated 29.7.2005 restraining the respondent/defendant from interfering in the possession or the process of cultivation by the petitioner-plaintiffs of the vacant portion lying on the northern side of the suit property. The respondent preferred an appeal which has been allowed by the learned Additional District Judge, Gurgaon vide his impugned order dated 19.8.2005 to the extent that the petitioners' injunction application has been dismissed and both the parties have been directed to maintain status-quo regarding possession over the subject property. While admitting this revision petition on 26.9.2005, this Court also directed the parties to maintain status-quo till further orders. It would, thus, be seen that the order directing the parties to maintain status-quo is operating since 2005. By now, it is possible that the civil suit might have been decided. However, even if the suit is still pending, the fact remains that the direction to maintain status- quo is operating for the last over four years. Any observation touching the merits of the case, at this stage would prejudice either of the parties. Consequently, this revision petition is disposed of with a direction that if the civil suit is still pending, the direction to maintain status-quo by both the parties shall continue to operate till the disposal of the suit. April 22, 2009. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE