IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 18TH JUNE 2009 / 28TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 16848 of 2009(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- LILLY SUNNY, W/O.SUNNY, AGED 35 YEARS, MANIMALAKUNNEL HOUSE, CHETTIYAMPARAMBIL P.O., KELAKAM, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.CIBI THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KANNUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK, KANNUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK, KELAKOM BRANCH, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, KELAKOM, KANNUR DISTRICT. 3. LEELA M.C., AGED 45 YEARS, PART TIME SWEEPER, DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK, KOTTIYOOR BRANCH, P.O.KOTTIYOOR, KANNUR DISTRICT. 4. CHANDRIKA.P.K., AGED 50 YEARS, PART TIME SWEEPER, DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK, PERAVOOR BRANCH, PERAVOOR. KANNUR DIST. 5. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, TRIVANDRUM. MR.K.C.SANTHOSHKUMAR, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.16848 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 18th day of June, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner submits that by Ext.P1, the 1st respondent had notified for the post of Part Time Sweeper. It is stated that the petitioner is one of the applicants and Ext.P2 is the application submitted by her. Although she was an eligible candidate, ignoring her eligibility, the Bank is proposing to appoint respondents 3 & 4, who, according to the petitioner, are ineligible as per the terms of the notification. It is also her case that certain other ineligible persons are also likely to be appointed. Therefore, it is averred that respondents 3 & 4 are impleaded in the writ petition in a representative capacity. 2. I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition primarily for the reason that at least at this stage, if the petitioner has a case that the Bank is proceeding to make appointment of ineligible candidates, the remedy of the petitioner is first to move the statutory authority, which is yet to be done. Therefore, leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue statutory remedies that are available, the writ petition is disposed of. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg