,l I 22 o/o 16.09.2OtI Present: Mr. Sachin Gupta, Adv. for the Plaintiff. Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. for the Defendants. +IA No. 14715r2O11 (g/O 23 R 3 r/w Sec. 151 CPCI and CS(OSI No. iwL Parties have settled their disputes before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. Terms of settlement have been recorded in para 6 of 'settlement Agreement' dated L"t Septembet,2OII, which is marked as "C-1". By this application under Order 23 Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC it has been prayed by the parties that an appropriate order be passed in terms of the settlement agreement which was duly signed by the autho rized.representative of the plaintiff, defendant No. 1 for himself as also for and on behalf of the other defendants, as well as their respective counsel and Mediator.. Original 'settlement Agreement' mark "C-1" has been received from the Mediation Centre. This application has not only been signed by the parties but is also supported by their affidavits. Defendant No. 1 is the sole proprietor of defendant Nos. 2 to 4. Sole proprietorship concern is nothing but creation of defend.ant No.1. Parties shall remain bound by the terms of settlement agreement. I find settlement to be lawful. Accordingly, a decree is passed in terms of mark "C-1" which sha1l form part of decree. Signing Date:31.08.2024 17:30:37 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified tG' Since parties have settled their disputes before the Mediation Centre, let court fee be refunded to the plaintiff, in accordance with law. , A11 the pending apptications as well as CCP are disposed of as infructuous. Date fixed in the matter i.e. L4ur October, 2OLl is cancelled. September 16, ?OLL rb