CWP No.5026 of 2008 - 1- In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. Date of decision:14.01.2009 Sumedha Bajaj ... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others. ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI Present: Mr.Hitesh Kapilsh, Advocate. Mr.BS Chahal, DAG, Punjab. -- PERMOD KOHLI, J. (Oral): I have heard the learned counsel for the parties at length. The petitioner has challenged the appointment of Respondent Nos.3 and 4 as also the selection process including her non selection. In the reply filed, it has been admitted by the respondents that the petitioner was having better merit than respondent Nos. 3 and 4. The State Government, however, constituted a Committee comprising Special Secretary School Education, as Chairman, Director, Public instructions (SE), Director, Defence Services Welfare (not below the rank of Deputy Director), Director Welfare of Scheduled Castes and Backward Classes (not below the rank of Deputy Director) as Members and Secretary, Punjab Subordinate Services Selection Board as Convener-cum-Member Secretary, to go into the entire gamut of selection to consider such like cases. CWP No.5026 of 2008 - 2- In the light of the reply this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the State/Committee to complete the process of scrutiny of the Selection of Science Mistresses within a period of three months from today and submit the report to the competent authority of the State. The Respondent-State, on receipt of the report, shall pass appropriate orders and if the selection is upheld and the petitioner is in the merit, she shall be given appointment within a period of two months thereafter. No costs. 14.01.2009 (PERMOD KOHLI) BLS JUDGE Note: Whether to be referred to the Reporter? NO