1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.476 OF 1999. Damyanti D/o Baliram Rakh ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents. ... Mr.H.K.Munde, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.N.B.Patil, Asstt.Govt. Pleader for the State. ... CORAM : B.R.GAVAI AND : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,JJ. Date : 06.08.2010. ORAL ORDER (Per S.V.Gangapurwala,J.) 1. The petitioner claims directions against the REspondents to act upon the letter given by the Selection Board in regard to the appointment of the petitioner. 2 2. The petitioner claims appointment as 'Anganwadi Sevika'. More than 12 years have passed, some one must have been appointed on the said post. If any orders are passed at this stage, that would adversely affect the said incumbent. Moreover, the Respondents have also given reasons for not appointing the petitioner i.e. the petitioner had not submitted the original experience certificate. 3. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. Rule discharged. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) (B.R.GAVAI,J.) asp/office/wp47699