//1// INTHE HIGH COURT OFJUDICATUREAT BILASPURgC.G1 W.P. (SW0. mtté /2009 Amitabh Bhute S/o ShriRadhelalBhute Age about 39 years, PETITIONER f. Q R/o Green Park Dharanpara—I ‘ I . Jagdalpur (C.G.) Wk RESPONDENTS V 1. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh Through— Secretary, Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and Bakward Class Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) The Commissioner, Tribal Development Raipur (C.G.) The Secretary, Mata Rukamani Sewa Sansthan Samiti, Dimrapal, Tah. & District-Jagdalpur (C.G.) ./ RITPEITTIONIJNDERARIIClESmOFI‘HE CONSTITUTION- OF INDIA f J W @ ‘ W'» 0&9“) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 5246 of2009 PETITIONER ‘ : Amitabh Bhute. , _ VERSUS RESPONDENTS' O: State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB Hon’ble Shrl Satlsh K. Agmhotn, J ‘res‘entz' ' Shr1 S P Kale Advocate for the pet1t10ner Smt Santa Ghal Panel Lawyer for the State ORDER ORAL (Passed on 14 day of September 2009) Heard leamed counsel for the parties. " 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision ofthis Court rendered in Smt A.Lall v. State ’ of Chham'sgarh & Othersi, thusthe petitioner may be permittedito make a representation to decide his case in the light of aforestated decision, subject to verification asto whether the respondent No 3-Institute is a Government Aided school and the petitioner 1s a teacher Within the sanctioned strength 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that m the event the petitioner i makes a representation, the same Will be conSidered and decided, 1n accordance with law, within a period offoUr weeks &om the date of receipt of ‘ , / the representation. 3.- In View of foregoing, according to the leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of./ Sdl- SatishK Agnihotrirlv Judge I 2007 (i) BLJ 265 P