:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY PETITION NO.48 OF 1996 COMPANY PETITION NO.48 OF 1996 COMPANY PETITION NO.48 OF 1996 OFFIFICIAL LIQIDATOR’S REPORT 21ST DECEMBER, 2005 OFFIFICIAL LIQIDATOR’S REPORT 21ST DECEMBER, 2005 OFFIFICIAL LIQIDATOR’S REPORT 21ST DECEMBER, 2005 In the matter of Compaies Act, I of 1956 And In the matter of M/s. Koyana Prestressed Products Ltd. (In Liqn.) M/s.Larson & Toubro Ltd. ..Petitioners. Mr.Samrat Rasal i/b.M/s.M.K.Ambalal & Co. for the Petitioners. Mr.C.N.Mehta for Hakimuddin. Mr.S.C.Gupta, Official Liquidator present. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 19TH JANUARY, 2006 DATED : 19TH JANUARY, 2006 DATED : 19TH JANUARY, 2006 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : The advertisement referred to the garage. It is on the basis of this advertisement that the auction purchaser made his bid. Even assuming that the valuer did not take the garage into consideration. The auction purchaser cannot be prejudiced by the same. The sale was confirmed over two years ago on 8th January, 2004. :2: 2. There is nothing that even remotely indicates that the auction purchaser has acted dishonestly or improperly. None of the parties have raised any objection to the same before me today. 3. In the circumstances, the sale is confirmed as per the order dated 8th January, 2004 and shall include the garage. 4. The Official Liquidator is directed now to expeditiously complete the sale in favour of the auction purchaser. 5. No further directions on the Liquidator’s Report are called for. The report is accordingly disposed of.