IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35743 of 2008 RAVINANDAN @ RAVINANDAN RAI, SON OF DINANATH RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-DHAMOUN, P.S. PATORI, DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR………………………………..PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR…..OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- 2. 25.11.08. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is an accused in connection with Deseri (Chandpur) P.S. Case No. 208/06 for offence under Section 7 of the E.C. Act. The allegation is that kerosene oil containing in 15 drums having 3000 litres were intercepted and the driver on being asked he disclosed that kerosene oil in question was being taken by the petitioner. The allegation is that said kerosene oil was being taken for black marketing. Although, the driver produced three receipts with respect to purchase of said kerosene oil which was issued in name of different persons for being delivery at different places mentioned in the said receipt. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that except submission of the driver, there is no material against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State opposed and submits that allegation of kerosene oil in question was being carried by the petitioner and who fled away when the said vehicle was intercepted. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to allow the anticipatory bail to the petitioner and his bail application is hereby rejected. m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.) - 2 -