1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- SPL. APPL. WRIT No. 938 of 2007 SMT.ANITA RANI V/S STATE & ORS. Mr. SD VYAS, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 30.10.2007 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. HON'BLE SHRI MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the appellant, perused the impugned order. The appellant was given appointment way-back in the year 1994, and she did not join. According to the averments of the writ petition, the appointment order was not sent, and on representation being made, the Vikas Adhikari submitted the report to the Executive Officer, which has been produced as Ex.1, a look at that also shows that it was reported that the appointment order was sent to the appellant at his residential address, and she did not report on duty within the time prescribed, nor did she contact the authorities. This Ex.1 is also of 11.4.2002. Thereafter the notice demanding justice is said to have been sent as late as on 15.12.2006 only. In these circumstances, the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition on the ground of delay, which order, in our 2 view, does not require any interference, with the simple additional reason that it does not stand to reason that if the appellant appeared for selection in the year 1994, she would lie low for all this time, and would not take steps for finding out the appointment order, if it is not received by her, and would not take steps for joining her duties. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed summarily. ( MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI ),J. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /tarun/