1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.50 OF 2009 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.502 OF 2008 Eknath Dinanath Purandare ..Applicant V/s Ramdas Janardan Purandare & ors ..Respondents Mr.N.V.Bhutekar i/b.Mr.Uday P. Warunjikar, Advocate, for the applicant None for the respondents CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATE : 6TH MARCH, 2009 P.C. . By the above Civil Application, the applicant prays for restoration of the Civil Revision Application which has been dismissed for non-prosecution on account of the conditional order dated 14th October 2008. By the said order, the applicant was to serve the respondents within a particular time frame and file an ffidavit of service within a period of 8 weeks of the said order. It is the case of 2 the applicant that the respondents in fact have been served but affidavit of service remained to be filed. In my view, Considering the reasons mentioned in the Civil Application, case for restoration of the Civil Revision Application is made out. Resultantly, Civil Revision Application is restored to file. In view of the restoration of the Civil Revision Application, issue fresh notice to the respondents, returnable in four weeks. Apart from the Court notice, the applicant shall serve a private notice on the respondents by Registered Post A.D. and/or by Courier Service and/or by Hand Delivery and shall file an affidavit of service before the returnable date. If the compliance is not made, the above Civil Application would stand dismissed for non-prosecution as against the unserved respondents without further reference to the Court. (R.M.SAVANT, J.)