HIGH €G’JRT GF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT §ETITION iS} NO 61 81 QF 2908 1. FETITE§NERS Q6 Chitrasen Patei, Sit) Shri NL. Patel, age 45 years, village Nandeli, P.O. Nandeli, District Raigam (CG}. Te} Kumas’ Patel, SR) Shri KR. Patel, agg 46 years, R/o Viilage Kalmi, RQ Dhanagers Disfrist Raigarh (CG). Tedaram Paiei, Sic Bhoia Ram Patei, age 49 years, Rio viiiage Kalmi, PD. ‘Dhanager, District Raigarh (CG). I Gircihari Lai Naik, Slo Paa‘men Singh Naik, age 45 years, R/o viiiage Kusmura; ‘Fahsii and Distriat Burg (CG; Versus Siate of Chhattisgarh. through ihe Secretary, School Education Department, D.K,S. Bhawari, Raipur {CG}. The District Education Gincer, ‘Raigarh. RESP§$§EENT5 n 4. (Wrii petition under Articie 226 of the Comtitution of India) Siiigie Bench : Hon’bie shri $atish K. Agnihoiri, J. Presettt :- Shri Somkant Verma, ceunsel forthe netitioners. Shri \Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Aeivacate General for the $tate. ORAL GRLEER {:3essed en this 2§m day of .Eehruary, 2mg) Shri ‘r’s. Thakut, iearned Dy. Adveeate General appearing for the $taie submits that the impugned order dated 15-9-2008 (Annexure-PXZ) hae aeimittetiiy been passed without afiording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Shri Thakur iur‘rher submits that the 3tate ehati reeaii the order and the State may be granted iibelty te take aperopriate steps after iesuing Show cause notiee and attoraing an opp'o'aunity of hearing ta the petitioner, in aeeere‘ance with iaw. in View oi the above categerical statement made by the iearned Dy. Aavocate Generai, according to learned counsel for the pettttonere nothing eurvtvee in this petition for attiudioation. iibei‘ty. Aocoroiingly. the petition stands oiiepoeett oi with the aiereeai Coneequentiy, interim order passect eartier stands disohargeo’ and the pending appiicatiens, if any, atso stand disposed of, /f /7 gamut“ ytdge t Gown - V7 sé' - "Saf\s" é /