1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR COMPANY APPEAL NO.6 OF 2004. IN COMPANY PETITION NO.1 OF 1997. Bhartiya Janta Kamgar Mahasangh Vs. Official Liquidator, High Court, Nagpur .......................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ........................................................................................................................................... Shri S.A. Kalbande, Advocate for Petitioner. Dr. Anjan De, Adfocate for Official Liquidator. CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 5th AUGUST, 2011. Dr. Anjan De, learned counsel appearing for the Official Liquidator makes a statement that the rejection of claims of six workers was not correct and it is required to be withdrawn. He further submits that the Official Liquidator shall adjudicate upon the claims of six workers afresh. In respect of claim regarding interest, Dr. De makes a statement that it is yet to be adjudicated upon and in due course of time, the same will also be adjudicated. A .....2/- 2 statement is also made that the adjudication shall be done within a period of six months. In view of the aforesaid statements, this appeal has become infructuous and it is dismissed as such. It is however, made clear that if the decision by the Official Liquidator goes against any of the workers, it shall be open for them to challenge the same by filing a fresh appeal. No costs. JUDGE NSN ...../-