Contempt Petition No. 103 of 2002 Hon’ble B. S. Verma,J Heard Sri T.A. Khan learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sharad Sharma learned counsel for ther respondent. Learned counsel for the respondent made a statement at bar that the Court’s order dated 23-3-2002 was revived by this Court on 21-5-2003 in the writ petition. After hearing both the parties, this court has finally decided the writ petition. This contempt petition has been filed before this Court for disobedience of the court’s order dated 23-3-2003, which was revived by the Court. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case the Contempt Petition is dismissed as infructuous. The Contempt petition is dismissed as infructuous. (B. S. Verma,J) 13-12-2006 M.K