IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH MARCH 2010 / 26TH PHALGUNA 1931 RP.No. 965 of 2009(A) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.37384/2003 Dated 10/06/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER ------------------------------------------- K.VENKATARAMANA BHAT, S/O.K.SHANKARA NARAYANA BHAT, IRIYA IN PULLUR VILLAGE,HOSDURG TALUK. BY ADV. SMT.T.D.RAJALAKSHMI RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE TAHSILDAR, HOSDURG. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KASARAGOD. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KSARAGOD. 4. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY G.P. SRI.LAKSHMI NARAYAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. .................................................................... R.P. No.965 OF 2009 in W.P.(C) No.37384 of 2003 .................................................................... Dated this the 17th day of March, 2010. ORDER Review is filed for the reason that the nature of title for the land held by the petitioner is not patta land to disqualify him for the assignment claimed. However, review petitioner does not deny the availability of so much of the extent of land with him disqualifying him from getting assignment. Review Petition is consequently dismissed. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge pms