IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 25TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 31548 of 2011(P) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. ABDULLA ASSAN ABDULLA (REG.NO.RDAGBDS002) S/O.P.V. HASSAN KUTTY, RESIDING AT 'ASSABATH HOUSE' KADALUNDI P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-673 302. 2. K. FASINA (REG.NO.RDAGBDS017) D/O.K. ABOOBACKER, RESIDING AT 'KAKKAT HOUSE', PULAMANTHOLE P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679 323. 3. LAVEENA JABAR, (REG.NO.RDAGBDSO29) D/O.ABDUL JABBAR,' RESIDING AT 'SARA MANZIL'. VANDAZHY P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 706. 4. MOHAMMED RIYAS. P. (REG.NO.RDAGBDS034) S/O.K.P.SAIFUNEESA, RESIDING AT 'KOTTAYIL HOUSE', MORAYUR P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-673 649 5. RAHUL E.R. (REG.NO.RDAGBDS044) S/O/E.G. RAVEENDRAN, RESIDING AT 'ERAT HOUSE', P.O. PERINJANAM, CHAKKARAPADAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 686. BY ADV. SRI.A.K.ABDUL AZEEZ, SRI.T.K.SASINDRAN, SRI.RENJIT GEORGE. RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE REGISTRAR, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY. P.O., CALICUT-673 635. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY. P.O., CALICUT-673 635. BY ADV. MR.SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC, CALICUT UTY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/11/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs WP(C).No. 31548 of 2011(P) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE CHALAN RECEIPTS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO. 8642/011(E) DATED 21/03/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 31548 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners are B.D.S. Students. When the result of the final year examination was declared, they had failed in one paper. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/- [true copy] P.S. to Judge