HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No, 3428 of 2007 PETITIQNERS 1. Rajendra Prasad Sinha, Aged about 42 years, S/o. Shri Kashi Ram Sinha, Assistant Teacher, Middie School, Puri, Charama, Kanker 2. Net Ram Sahu, Aged about 40 years, S/o. Shri Lekh Ram Sahu, Assistant Teacher, Primary School, Aroud Charama, Kanker 3. Santu Ram Sahu, Aged about 50 years, S/o. Keju Ram Sahu, Assistant Teacher, Primary School, Kurrubhat, Charama, Kanker 4. Smt.Savitri Sahu, Aged about 42 yeare, W/o. Shri Kamlesh Sahu, Assjstarrt Teacher, Primary School, Tarasgaon, Charma, Kanker All are at Btock Charama, Distt. Kanker VERSUS RESPONDENTS <-.- 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) 2. The Director, Public Instruction, Raipur 3. District Education Officer, Kanker District Kanker (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Charama, Distt. Kanker(C.G.) 5. Treasury & Funds Department, Kanker ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Single Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri Present: Mr. D.N. Prajapati, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Pane! lawyerforthe respondents/Stete. R° Karuna ORDER (Passed on 22"" day of June,2007) The question of law involved herein is asto whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. ttie date of initiat appointment orfrom the date ofcompletion of probation period. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as welt as for the respondents/State jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petifon are the same to thatof in W.P. (S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh and others), which was allowed vide orderdated 7.11.2006. In view of the above-stated submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge .e