IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6580 OF 2008 IN FA ST. NO. 8009 OF 2008 (Executive Engineer, Uppar Painganga Project vs. Anandrao Gyanbarao Kadam & Ors.) AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6581 OF 2008 IN FA ST. NO. 8030 OF 2008 (Exec utive Engineer, Uppar Painganga Project vs. Govinda Maroti Totewad through Nilawati & Ors.) AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6636 OF 2008 IN FA ST. NO. 10331 OF 2008 (Executive Engineer, Uppar Painganga Project vs. Saraswatabai W. Deshmukh & Ors.) AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6639 OF 2008 IN FA ST. NO. 8027 OF 2008 (Executive Engineer, Uppar Painganga Project vs. Bapurao Rama Kale & Ors.) AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6640 OF 2008 IN FA ST. NO. 8018 OF 2008 (Exe cutive Engineer, Uppar Painganga Project vs. Shankar Jalba Raote through Godavaribai & Ors.) WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6642 OF 2008 IN FA ST. NO. 8033 OF 2008 (Executive Engineer, Uppar Painganga Project vs. Kisanrao Vishwambhar Jadhao & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. JANUARY 14, 2009. Smt. Chaudhary, learned counsel for the appellant/ applicant points out that in identical matters, this Court has on earlier occasion condoned delay. Nobody appears for the respondents, though they are served. I have perused the order dated 21.7.2008 passed on Civil Application No. 5651 of 2007, as pointed out by Smt. Chaudhary, learned counsel. In the circumstances, in view of the said order, delay in present matters is also condoned. The office to register First Appeals and place it for further consideration. JUDGE *GS.