IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 349 of 2010 Date of decision: 14.12.2010. Anupama Paul …Petitioner. Versus Vivek Paul …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Deepak Gupta, J. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner: Mr. M.L.Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. S.R.Sharma vice Mr. B.N.Misra, Advocate. Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral) 1. By means of this petition the petitioner has sought transfer of matrimonial proceedings filed against her by her husband from the Court of District Judge, Kinnaur at Rampur Bushahr to the Court of the District Judge, Solan. 2. Shri S.R.Sharma appearing vice Mr. B.N.Misra, learned counsel for the respondent states that husband has no objection to the case being transferred to any Court including the Court of District Judge, Solan. 3. In view of the statement made on behalf of the respondent this petition is allowed and the Divorce Petition No.20-R/3 of 2010 titled as Vivek 1 Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes. 2 Paul versus Anupama pending in the Court of learned District Judge, Kinnaur at Rampur Bushahr, is transferred to the Court of learned District Judge, Solan. The parties through their learned counsel are directed to appear before the learned District Judge, Solan on 7th March, 2011. No costs. 14th December, 2010 (Deepak Gupta) ™ Judge