IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 17TH JANUARY 2011 / 27TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 1454 of 2011(F) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- CHANDANA GOPAN, AGED 17 YEARS (MINOR), D/O. GOPAKUMAR, REPRESENTED BY FATHER AND GUARDIAN GOPAKUMAR, 52 YEARS, S/O. SOMASUNDARAM, ASVINI BHAVAN, VETTIKKATTIRI, CHERUTHURUTHI, THALAPPILLY TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU, SENIOR ADVOCATE SMT.M.M.DEEPA SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL) RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. APPEAL COMMITTEE, SCHOOL KALOSAVAM, DISTRICT LEVEL, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KOTTAYAM (FUNCTIONING AS GENERAL CONVENER, STATE KALOLSAVAM) 4. THE GENERAL CONVENER, KERALA STATE SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM 2010-2011, KOTTAYAM (BY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KOTTAYAM) 5. THE PROGRAMME CONVENER, KERALA STATE SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM 2010 -2011, KOTTAYAM. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.DILEEPMOHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 1454 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 17th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T In the Palakkad District Kalolsavam, petitioner participated in the item Kerala Natanam. The team was awarded 3rd prize with A Grade. Aggrieved by the prize given, they filed an appeal and approached this Court complaining that the appeal was kept without any orders. 2. Learned Government Pleader has obtained instructions in the matter. It is stated that the appeal filed by the petitioner was heard on 13/1/2011, rejected by order dated 14/1/2011 and the result was communicated to the petitioner on 15/1/2011. It is also stated that the first and second prize winners had secured 255 and 246 marks respectively where as the petitioner's team secured only 233 marks. 3. From the above, therefore, it is obvious that now the appeal has been decided and that there is vide disparity in the marks secured by the petitioner and the first and second prize winners, who are also not impleaded in the writ petition. In the WPC No. 1454/11 :2 : result, I do not find any merit in the writ petition. Writ petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp