.£8EN! IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH! AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fS) N0. S6)i3 /2010 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PETITIQNER ^\vo...... „, , ^ ^.^y^. ?-"i~' ^--i*t" 'v- »...?<ma'- ...-.••i-r"" ..»— y->"-/\'"° ^....-•^ RESPONDENTS Sukhnandan Ram Kachlame, aged about 50 years, son of Shri Faguram Kachlame, occupation - Asst. Teacher, Presently Upper Division Teacher, working at Govt Higher Secondary School - Chilhati, Vikas Khand - Ambasgarh Chowki, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) VERSUS •e" 1.' State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of Tribal, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur . (C.G.) 2. Asst. Commissioner, Deptt of Tribal, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) 3." Joint Director (Treasury, A/c & Pension), Raipur (CG) 4. ' Block Education Officer, Block - Ambagarh Chowki, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG). '/' "*; T ^^»i.B"a^ TST'•:qTzlRT;rt,'^rtWT?, [s|(<ll-Hll< Q..^,.^\ll^, 311^1 W ft-fi'* WT -SII^T Eh*l s^y TRi ^nw^rft^an^r SB : Hon'uie Shri Maninura Mohg 2947-2010 Shri A.N.BhaMa, counsei foi Shri vinod Tskarn, Pansi La i-leara. |the petitioner. La'h/yer for the State. Learnea counsel appearing is entitied to benefit of fwo advai] passed B.T.i. examination before subrnitted that the issue involveu integra ana ine sarne nas ueen una in the case of Asha Saxet'ia vs. Si 53. it is further submitteu that this order dated OS-02-20G9 passed counsei Tor the Detltioner further di 29-04-2010 passed in WritAppeal juQgment OT tne oupreme uoun in order passed by this Court in ani have been issued for consideratic incrernents as per cireuiar dateu 2 Pradesh.'after veriiicauon ofthe fac Learnea counsei ror ine petitioner wouifl aiso Be consiQereu ^NcpftTWRff if fe^i ^?3ffii*T3iI*^ n i>nnvasiavs, >i. ?r the petitioner submits that the petitioner ice incrernents on account of he having nis ayDOinimeni ai nis ovm cosi. 11 is In the present petition is no ionyer res iivdecided bvthe hion ble SuDrerne Court ate ufMP^a_Qrs^£OWwBMPs}Bf'sU) uoun nss aiso laKefi a simsaaf victvv EH iis in Vv.P.(S)No.S257 of 2008. Lsarned av»s atteriuon 01 tiiis court to order uated f'io.1^4 ot 2uuy, wrierei'n reiying upon ttie ihe case of Asha Saxena {sapra) and the ?ther Vyi'it Appeai No.87/2009, directjons !n OT ine case Tor oi'ant OT rvro aavance -09-1 S74 tssued bv the State of iviadhva ts Dleaded in the oetitjon. repponasnis suumiis inai ine case OT ine lun ine same iines. de above, thls petition Is ilnaliy disposed in vie'w OT me statement rng off 'with a direction to the respond^nt authorities to consider and decide the 5!ra0^^hltoss?iira.!',.."?w<i'it<T—FS/H7—2/2010—1,00,000. T ..^s^. IC-^^.^ ^.....3; "^&dS^" '3~S[ •^i!^ldt|, ®TTl'M4i(o,fqMiyy ..bS.f£<)..^'?..:....3..c'.'..l!.?£. affl^T'^5pF(-ipf3qs'!;() an^iwf^m; 'tTO Sil^il aiiiti TRIIW 1Hfef 311^1 --.t-St— ciaiin OT me peiiuonsr ror grani or uated 21-08-1974 Issued by-the ;oiafe or rviaunva r'raQesn, auer ver»icaiionOT the facts pieaded in the peiition withl •*i''4irt41-i "wwft''? fyat <r«^^i< ^STRpTSd^i " s -^ -». Two aavance incrsments as Der circuiai n a perluu of elght weeks from today. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrwastava - Judge 3S?Tra^T ^N%s;lifT^ir, ^r-l^mq—FS/147—2/2010—1,00,000.