IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.17291 of 2009 Date of Decision : December 16, 2010. Vikas Vohra .....Petitioner versus Indian Oil Corporation .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Abhishek S.Bhaskar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Ashish Kapoor, Advocate, for the respondent. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner applied for the LPG Distributorship pursuant to an advertisement issued in December, 2007. The petitioner was not selected and being aggrieved against the merit panel, he has filed a complaint. Since no decision has been taken on his complaint that he has approached this Court. The respondents have filed their reply-affidavit acknowledging the receipt of the complaint which is stated to be still under consideration. In these circumstances and without expressing any views on the merits of the petitioner's allegations, I deem it appropriate to dispose of C.W.P.No .17291 of 2009 2 this writ petition with a direction to the respondent-Corporation to dispose of the petitioner's pending complaint by passing a speaking order within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say that if the petitioner is still aggrieved, he would be at liberty to approach an appropriate forum. Dasti. December 16, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE