1 ao225-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION rpa APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.225 OF 2011 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.333 OF 2011 Abu Arshi Khan Fakruddin Khan & Ors. .. Appellants V/s. Jairam Gowda .. Respondent ..... Mr. Natan Moily for the appellants. Mr. Prashant Deshmukh for the respondent. ..... CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : MARCH 21, 2011. P.C.:- Some of the original defendants have taken an exception to the ad-interim order dated 7th December, 2009 passed by the Judge, City Civil Court, Dinodshi, Mumbai, by which the learned trial Judge has directed the defendants in the suit not to deal with or dispose off the suit property without the consent of the respondent-plaintiff. The Notice of Motion of temporary injunction is still pending. 2 ao225-11 2. Ad-interim relief granted on 7th December, 2009 is operating since last 15 months. It is stated that the main Notice of Motion is ready for hearing. 3. considering the nature of the impugned order, at this stage, no interference is called for. Accordingly, Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. 4. All contentions of the parties on merits of the Notice of Motion are kept open. 5. Hearing of the Notice of Motion is expedited. 6. Civil Application No.333 of 2009 does not survive and the same is disposed of. JUDGE