IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-21403 of 2009 Date of decision : 24.9.2009 Harjit Singh alias Gabber ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present: Mr.P.K.S.Phoolka, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.B.B.S.Teji, AAG, Punjab for the State. .... MAHESH GROVER, J. The dispute inter se between the petitioner and complainant is regarding possession of plot and demolition of boundary wall. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the dispute is of civil nature. Noticing this fact, on 6.8.2009 this Court granted interim protection to the petitioner subject to the condition that he will join the investigation to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer. It has now been contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner and not controverted by the learned counsel for the State on instructions from HC Baljit Singh that the petitioner has since joined the investigation. Crl.Misc.No.M-21403 of 2009 -2- After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the considered opinion that since the petitioner has joined the investigation to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer pursuant to the directions dated 6.8.2009, the petition deserves to be allowed. Consequently, the present petition is allowed and the interim directions dated 6.8.2009 are hereby made absolute till the filing of the challan subject to the condition that the petitioner continues to comply with the provisions of Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. 24.9.2009 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss