IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO.776 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 09.07.2008 in W.P.NO.14638 OF 2008 on the ﬁle of the High Court.) Between: M/s. Chakkilam Travels 6-3-649/5, III Floor, Chikkilam House, Somajiguda, Rep. by its Proprietor, Sri C.Raghuram. ...APPELLANT AND 1 M/s. P.K.L. Limited, 8-3-1087, Plot No.48, Srinagar Colony, Hyderabad - 500 073, Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Company Secretary Sri.R.Kalyan Bhasker. 2 District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, 9th floor, Chandra Vihar, Mojamjahi Market, Hyderabad, Rep. by its President. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: MR.G.NARENDER RAJ Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court delivered the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO.776 of 2008 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Mr Justice B.Prakash Rao) The appellant is the unsuccessful writ petitioner, who, by way of this appeal, seeks to assail the order passed on 09.07.2008 in W.P.No.14638 of 2008 by the learned Single Judge, where under he sought to assail the order dated 16.06.2006 in C.C.No.936 of 2005 on the ﬁle of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, Hyderabad. The main ground urged on behalf of the appellant is that having regard to the nature of the transaction, it do not fall within the parameters of the Consumer Forum and the Forum is not right in allowing the claim made by the contesting respondent. Having found that as against the said order of the Forum, a regular appeal is provided under the Law, the learned Single Judge declined to entertain the grievance of the appellant/petitioner as a Writ of Certiorari under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and dismissed the Writ Petition. Hence, the appeal. Having heard on either side and on perusal of the material available on record, we are in entire agreement with the order of the learned Single Judge in regard to availability of alternative remedy of regular appeal, where he can raise all the objections. The same will be gone into and disposed of in accordance with law in the appeal to be ﬁled by the appellant before the Appellate Forum within a period of four {4} weeks from today. Subject to the above, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) ________________ (R.KANTHA RAO, J) 4th September 2008 RRB