^r mTHEHIGHQURTQFJUDICATUREATBII.^PUR CHHATTISGARH WritPetitionNo. 123^/2004. :^f ^ •fc-?' Petitioner: / Respondents: 1. Shri T. Tatha Rao, S/o Shri T. Snyasi Rao, aged about 38 years, resident of village Narayana Patnam, Post Moida, Nellimoria, MO Vijayanagaram District (AP). Vs Union of India, through the Secretaty, Ministry of Labour. Go\'1:. of India, Shram Bhavan, New Delhi. / General Manager, South East Central Railway, Bilaspur (CG) 4V<^€^ ^s" •^y^^ ^1,: ^..•' 3. / The Divisional Railway Manager, South ^t; ,..••"' East Central Railw&y, Bilaspur (CG) PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 22<6/2^7 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ^ XI-HC-78 ^n^r^Tf^ri^ c[8TT3TT^T$hH|ch *ll+l<<ll ffi+lich 3^ ^ll^l lcrt^, i?TfteTT^, Rl<rtw^ ^...^.f5J.^6/p..t^ 200 3TT^T ira^T (y<i^<s<^) 5^TTW: ^rf?cf;3rTT^T 8.11.2006 Shri Vinod Deshmutch, Shri S.K. Beriwal, Stai|iding counsel for Union of ln4ia. tsounsel for the petitiCTier. Counsel with Shri Ghanshyam Patet, The instant petition ui|ider Article 226/227 of the Constitution of india is directed against the o|xler No. 1, Union of India, wherebly dispute to the Tribunal unde(' stating the fojlowjng reason : "jn the opinion of Centj-at refer the above dispu^es Tribunal". reflsrence Learned counsel not have decfined to make various orders passed by thisj order jmpugned, on the face instant petition shoutd be a(lo\(|red <=bl^fcrt41T1 WToTf ^* teI<FI' <Ri^i< ^3T1^T3TI^T of Annexure P/1 passed by respondent respondent No. 1 has refused to refer the the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, Govemment, there is no grounct to for adjudication to ttie Indusfrjal for th4 petitioner submits that Union of Indte could by deciding flie dispute itsetf. CMIng [Court from time to tirne, it is argued that the |of it, is not maintajnable and therefore, the Learned counsel for fhe respondente does not controvert the above submission of the coun|sel for the petitioner. mw~ XI-HC-78 ^W-WMI<^^^ tWl 8T-3H-IX <IlN^l|'^hHrw ^.'.Ll&-24^ 3;n^T^Tfe^t: cr8TT3TR?T$h^|ch ^ f^? ^ 'fe^fT? •F^?1r ' E ^]T& RR=h=£^tTW ^?ff 3TT^T J ^^y •^" y <^i^F<n41Ti ^iHdT^te^ T^Tfr; 1?§t!7TrfT^ gri^3^ ^^W.]7ff1f& OTT^T^WTTO Consequentl^, the pepition is allowed. Imp^igned order of Annexure P/1 refusj^ig referen^ ofdispute to Indusfriat 1]ribunal is hereby quashed. Union of India (r|espondent No. 1) tfirou^i its Secretery, j Ministry of Labour, ^ovt. pf ln|dia, Ss directed to make a|reference ofthe 1 dispute within a thisorder. iod oftwo months from the date of r^ceipt of copy of Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge P.T.O.