(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1892 OF 1997 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1892 OF 1997 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1892 OF 1997 IN IN IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 49 OF 1996 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 49 OF 1996 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 49 OF 1996 Pune Municipal Corporation ...Applicant Versus Shri. Amit Seth and Ors ...Respondents ..... Mr. R.M. Pethi i/b R.G.Ketkar, Advocate for Applicant Mr. U.V. Nikam, A.P.P. for State. None for respondent No.1 though served. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. DATED: 10TH OCTOBER, 2005 DATED: 10TH OCTOBER, 2005 DATED: 10TH OCTOBER, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- . This application has been preferred for restoration of Criminal writ petition No. 49 of 1996 which was disposed of by this Court by order dated 8.7.97. It is the contention of the learned advocate for the applicant that the matter was dismissed for default. I have perused the order dated 8.7.1997 passed in writ petition No.49 of 1996 and I find that the matter has been disposed of on merits. In this view of the matter, this application for restoration cannot be considered, hence the application is rejected. *****