CRM-M No.26730 of 2011 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.26730 of 2011 Date of decision : 16.12.2011 Smt. Renu Singh and another ...... Petitioners v. State of Haryana ...... Respondent *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Upender Prasher, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Man Mohan Sikka, DAG, Haryana *** AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case F.I.R. No.341 dated 2.10.2010 registered under Sections 420, 406, 468, 471, 506 and 120-B IPC at Police Station Parao, District Ambala Cantt. The allegations against the petitioners are that in conspiracy with the husband and son of petitioner No.1 (who happened to be the brother of the petitioner No.2) they had cheated the complainants in the matter of sending them abroad (brushing allegations). Learned counsel has stated that the complainants were arrested in Mumbai on return from Malaysia and had recorded the statement over CRM-M No.26730 of 2011 ::2:: there. In that statement, they had mentioned only two co-accused but had made no mention of the petitioners. As per learned counsel the petitioners have no role to play. Learned State counsel though has refuted the arguments that the petitioners have no role to play yet as per the instructions of SI Balbir Singh, has accepted that in the FIR which is recorded at Mumbai, the complainant did not mention the present petitioners. In this view of the matter, the Court finds it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Ordered accordingly. The petitioners are directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on 26.12.2011 and on any other date as and when his presence is required. On their appearance, the Investigating Officer would release them on bail subject to the conditionso envisaged under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) December 16, 2011 JUDGE akm