IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13857 of 2008 1. RAJ NARAYAN VISHWAKARMA. 2. Rajesh Vishwakarma @ Rajesh Kumar. 3. Ritu Devi @ Ritu. 4. Awadhesh Vishwakarma @ Awadhesh Kumar. 5. Rubi Devi @ Rubi. 6. Ramesh Vishwakarma @ Ramesh Kumar. 7. Shashi Prabha, All R/O Village- Saiyad Raja, P.S.- Saiyad Raja, District- Chandauli (U.P.) .......Petitioners. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR. 2. Ramaurat Vishwakarma. ..........Opp. Parties. ----------- 3 13.01.2011 The present application has been filed for quashing the order of cognizance passed by learned S.D.J.M., Bhabhua in Complaint Case No. C 432 of 2007 passed on 23.06.2007, whereby the cognizance was taken under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The quashing of revisional order dated 05.03.2008 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, FTC-I, Kaimur at Bhabua in Cr. Rev. No. 166 of 2007/18 of 2007 has also been prayed for, whereby the leaned revisional court modified the cognizance order and found the case only under Section 420 of the I.P.C. It is very fairly submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the trial is at the advance stage. On that ground alone, I am not inclined to interfere with the matter. However it is submitted by learned counsel for 2 the petitioner that the girl had already married to different person and now any order by the trial court will jeopardise the life of the petitioner’s side. Let the learned court below consider this aspect of the matter as any order at this juncture may prejudice the life of the petitioners as some of the petitioners are quite old suffering from heart disease. With the aforesaid observations this application is disposed off. Bhardwaj/- ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)