IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 18724 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 22.09.2011 Raj Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Sanjeev Manrai, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.S. Bajwa, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. V.S. Punia, Advocate for the complainant. RAJESH BINDAL, J. The allegations against the petitioner in the present FIR are that he had sold property owned by him, which was already mortgaged with the Bank for raising loan. Property was sold for a sum of ` 10,00,000/-, whereas the petitioner had raised loan of ` 21,00,000/- from the Bank against the same. Considering the allegations against the petitioner, I do not find this to be a fit case for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. Dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 22.09.2011 sharmila