IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR MONDAY, THE 15TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 26TH MAGHA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 1536 of 2009(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.10272/2009 Dated 27/03/2008 .................... PETITIONER(S): IST PETITIONER IN WP(C): --------------------------------------------------------------- T.VASANTHA,AGED 47 YEARS,W/O.PRABHAKARAN KOTTAPPURATH HOUSE,KOZHIKATTIRI.P.O,PATTAMBI (CASUAL SWEEPER,MOBILE SOIL TESTING LABORATORY, PATTAMBI). BY ADVS. MR.SANTHEEP ANKARATH, MR.V.C.MADHAVANKUTTY. RESPONDENT(S): IST RESPONDENT IN WP(C): ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RAVEENDRAN,(AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER),PRINCIPAL AGRICULTURAL OFFICER,PALAKKAD. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.ANU SIVARAMAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Contempt Case (Civil) No. 1536 OF 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 15th day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T As per the judgment dated 27.3.2008 in WP(C)No.10272 of 2008 this court directed the first respondent to take a decision on the claims of the petitioners therein with notice to them and in the light of the direction issued in WPC No.19186/05 and connected cases. A further direction was issued to determine the claim of the petitioners for arrears in terms of the directions issued in Writ Appeal No. 1863 of 2004 and connected case. When the matter was taken up for admission, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in terms of the directions in the judgment dated 27.3.2008 the first respondent has passed an order dated 5.1.2010. But the grievance is that the arrears to which the petitioners are entitled were not properly determined and disbursed. Considering the fact that the directions of this court in the judgment dated 27.3.2008 has been admittedly, complied with there is no reason to proceed with this contempt case. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. However, the petitioners in the Writ Petition will be at liberty to the petitioner to pursue grievances with respect to the order passed by the first respondent on 5.1.2010. Sd/- (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A. To Judge