IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1987 of 2008 BHOLA RAM Versus GIWAJ RAM @ JEWAJ RAM & ORS ----------- 4 10/12/2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. There would be no end of the dispute if filibusterous attitude adopted by the petitioner in contesting the suit is allowed to be continued. In the subsequent suit, i.e., the present suit a plea has been taken by the plaintiff-petitioner that certain oral evidence of defendant no.2 in an earlier suit being Title Suit No. 97 of 2002 was relevant and should have been taken on record by admitting the said deposition in evidence and making it as Exhibit. The Court below has rejected such prayer purportedly on the ground that it was not only a belated effort that such prayer was made but also that if admission of defendant no.2 was to be taken, this question was required to be put to him in his cross examination in the present suit. This Court would thus not find any error in the impugned order, muchless, a jurisdictional error. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar