((-1-)) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7327 OF 2006 Vilas Vasant Saraf Petitioner versus The Divisional Controller MSRTC, Pune. Respondent Nitin A. Kulkarni for petitioner. CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J. DATE : 08th November 2006 PC : 1. Heard. The petitioner challenges the impugned interim order passed by the Labour Court as well as Industrial Court rejecting the application for interim relief in the nature of protection to the services of petitioner during pendency of the proceedings before the Court below. Both Courts below have arrived at a concurrent finding on the basis of materials on record that the same, prima facie, disclose involvement of the petitioner in the misappropriation of the amount and his involvement in the misconduct in that regard. In view of the said concurrent finding to the effect ((-2-)) that the materials prima facie disclose involvement of the petitioner in the alleged misconduct, there cannot be any justification or interference in the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of Constitution of India in the impugned orders. Petition, therefore, is rejected. (R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J.)