IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 3RD JUNE 2011 / 13TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 8560 of 2011(T) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SANDHYA.A., SANSKRIT TEACHER, VILLIAPPALLY U.P.SCHOOL, VILLIAPPALLY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.K.MURALEEDHARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY SECRETARY TO GENERAL EDUCATION DEPT., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KOZHIKODE. 4. THE ASST.EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THODANNUR, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.8560/2011-T ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 3rd day of June, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is working as a Sanskrit Teacher in the Villiappally U.P.School in Kozhikode District. With regard to the claim for Full Time benefit, the petitioner had occasion to move the Director of Public Instruction and, by Ext.P9 order, a favourable order was passed by the Additional Director of Public Instruction and the order is dated 18/02/2010. But the petitioner was served with another order passed by the Joint Director of Public Instruction which is also dated 18/02/2010 whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioner was rejected. During the hearing of the writ petition on the last occasion, learned Government Pleader submitted that the matter is being reconsidered and appropriate orders will be passed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has produced before me for perusal proceedings of the Joint Director of Public Instruction dated 25/04/2011 which is passed after noticing the contradictory orders W.P.(C). No.8560/2011 -:2:- issued as per Exts.P9 and P10. Therein, it is directed that the request of the Manager and the petitioner for sanction of Full Time post of Sanskrit to the school for the year 2008-09 by Group 'C' diversion of periods can be considered and allowed and accordingly, the orders Exts.P9 and P10 have been modified. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in the light of the Government Order dated 04/11/2010, which has permitted continuance of the system of Group 'C' diversion of periods upto 2010- 11, the Assistant Educational Officer may be directed to consider the claim of the petitioner for the subsequent years also. 4. Therefore, the Assistant Educational Officer will consider the claim of the petitioner in the light of the order dated 25/04/2011 passed by the Joint Director of Public Instruction, Thiruvananthapuram for the subsequent years, namely, 2009-10 and 2010-11. Appropriate modified orders will be passed within a period of two months. The petitioner will produce a W.P.(C). No.8560/2011 -:3:- copy of the order dated 25/04/2011 passed by the Joint Director of Public Instruction, Thiruvananthapuram along with a copy of the writ petition and this Judgment before the fourth respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms \\TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE