IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD. (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MAY, TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO.10619 OF 2009 B e t w e e n: Shaik Lateef Saheb, S/o.Chinna Lateef, Aged 55 Years, Business, R/o.D.No.19-171, Big Mosque street, Vinukonda, Guntur District. - - - Petitioner. A n d 1. The Vinukonda Municipality, Vinukonda, Guntur District, Rep. by its Municipal Commissioner. 2. Eemani Brahmanachari, S/o.Veera Brahmachari, Aged about 50 Years, R/o.Srinivasa Nagar, Vinukonda Town, Vinukonda, Guntur District. 3. Ravutla Venkateswarlu, S/o.Not known to the petitioner, Aged about 40 Years, Goldsmith, R/o.Aga Bavi, Vinukonda Town, Vinukonda, Guntur District. 4. Pinnadri Seshachari, S/o.Anjaiah, Aged 50 Years, R/o.Srinivasa Nagar, Vinukona Town, Vinukonda, Guntur District. 5. Kundurthi Tripurachari, S/o.Not known to the petitioner, Goldsmith, R/o.Vinukonda Town, Vinukonda, Guntur District. 6. Machabattini Venkatachari, S/o.Venkateswarlu, Aged about 55 Years, Retired Employee, R/o.D.No.29/946, Kothapeta, Vinukonda Town, Vinukonda, Guntur District. 7. Kottapalli Kotaiah, S/o.Not known to the petitioner, Aged about 50 Years, R/o.Vinukonda Town, Vinukonda, Guntur District. - - - Respondent(s). Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not disposing off the representation dated.04-05-2009 and 08- 05-2009 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the 1st respondent to dispose off the representation forthwith and further restrain the respondents 2 to 7 from making any constructions in the property situated at D.No.351/2, Vinukonda, Guntur district and pass such other orders. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.O.MANOHER REDDY. Counsel for the Respondent(s) : MR.S.NAGESWAR REDDY. The court made the following : THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO.10619 OF 2009 O R D E R: Heard Sri O.Manoher Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.Nageswar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents and at their request the writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. The only grievance of the petitioner is that the first respondent is not disposing of the representations dated.04-05- 2009 and 08-05-2009 submitted by him respectively and in not restraining the respondents 2 to 7 from making any constructions in the property situated at D.No.351/2, Vinukonda, Guntur District. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, there is no need to go into the merits of the case and it is suffice if the first respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the representations dated.04-05-2009 and 08-05-2009 submitted by the petitioner and take action in accordance with the law. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider and dispose of the representations dated.04-05-2009 and 08-05-2009 submitted by the petitioner and to take action in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs. __________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J. MAY 28, 2009. Ds/Cvrk.