IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 23083 of 2006 Between: 1 The Director (PA&W) M/s. Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd., Kothagudem, Khammam District. 2 The General manager, (Project) M/s Singareni Collieries co. Ltd., Yellandu Area, Khammam District. 3 TheSuperintendent of Mines M/s Singareni Collieries co. Ltd., JK-5, Incline, Yellandu, Khammam District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Presiding Officer, Central Government, Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Hyderabad. 2 Sri John Mohammed S/o Gulam Mohammed R/o Qtr. No. D-49, 24 Incline, Yellandu, Khammam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari after calling for the records from the 1st respondent pertaining to LCID No. 178 of 2003 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and pass such other order or orders as deemed fit and necessary inthe interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.J.PRABHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 23083 of 2006 ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the Singareni Collieries Company Limited, assailing the award, dated 27.09.2004, in L.C.I.D.No.178 of 2003 on the file of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad. During the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioners filed W.P.M.P.No.3734 of 2008, stating that a dispute identical to the one between the petitioners and the 2nd respondent was resolved by the Lok Adalat and that the 2nd respondent has also made a request that he be extended the same benefit. Agreeing to extend the benefit, the petitioners had incorporated certain terms in the affidavit filed in support of the W.P.M.P. It was ultimately prayed that the writ petition be disposed of, in terms of the conditions mentioned in paragraph 5 of the affidavit. Learned counsel for the 2nd respondent has also expressed his consent for the same. This Court had ordered W.P.M.P.No.3734 of 2008 on 26.02.2008. The result is that the award impugned in the writ petition stands set aside and the dispute between the petitioners and the 2nd respondent stands settled, in accordance with the terms incorporated in the affidavit. Therefore, nothing remains to be decided in this writ petition, and it is, accordingly, closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _________ 09.04.2008 Note: Issue C.C. in one week. (B/o) JSU ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRT} THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 23083 of 2006 Date: 09.04.2008 JSU