IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.12304 of 2011 Kumar Nagendra Versus Patna High Court,Patna & Ors ---------------------------------- 02. 01.08.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner for directing the Patna High Court and also the Civil Court, Patna to dispose of the title suit no.221 of 2007 expeditiously on the ground that the evidences of both the parties have already been closed on 23.09.2008 and the case is pending for hearing but it is not being disposed of. A supplementary affidavit has been filed by the petitioner stating therein that now the case has been transferred to Sub Judge V, Patna City. It appears that earlier the case was pending in vacant court and, therefore, the petitioner filed representation before the District Judge, Patna to transfer the case from vacant court to any regular court. Now, considering the prayer of the petitioner, the District Judge has already transferred the case from vacant court to regular court. In my view, the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed by the District Judge, Patna, therefore, this application has become now infructuous. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Saurabh (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)