IN THE HIGH COURT OE- JUDICATURE (W CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0.-f(^.2 _/2006 -T'^^\~ PETITIONER ,^^°? %tt>^'•vs^. Mohd. Arif S/o Late'Shri Abdul Majid Aged about 55 years R/o Raja Talab New Basti Near- Aadarsh Chwdk- P.8. Civil Line, Raipur, Tah & District- Raipur (C.G.) s^w RJESPONDENTS ^y '^€^" /" Jy'o V ^' ^ ^" /^0/ ^^ .-••' VERSUS 1) StateofChhattisgarh ^ Through : Station House OfBcer, Police station - Raipur (C.G.) 2) Superintendent of PoUce ^ Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.) 3) Inspector General of PoUce. Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) WRITPETTnONUNDER.ARTICLE 226/2270F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT(S) OR ORDERfS) OR DIRECTION(S) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 2542 of 2006 P^liti elitioner Mohd. Arif Versus Respondents State ofChhattisgarh & Others, WKIT PETiriON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF [NDIA Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. I'rcseiTt:- Shri Y.C.Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.S.Kachhawaha, Dy. Advocate General for the State/ respondents. ORDER fORAL} (Passed on 13th day ofSept.ember, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in the light ofdecision ofthe Supreme Court in Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P. & others , the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to take appropriate steps under the provisions oflaw as observed in Sakiri Vasu (supra). 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side has no objection. 3. lt is ordered accordingly. 4. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above stated liberty, ifso advised. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Asliiik (2008) 2 SCC 409