IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6475 of 2007 Date of decision: 20.01.2009. Veerpal Kaur ...Petiitioner Versus Jasbir Kaur and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: None for the petitioner. Ms. Divya Godara, Advocate for the respondents. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. The plaintiff-petitioner is in revision against the order dated 8.10.2007 vide which the learned Trial Judge disposed of a plea filed by the plaintiff-petitioner under Order 7 Rule 11 of the C.P.C. for the rejection of the plaint. I have been through the impugned order with the assistance of the learned counsel for the petitioner. The order is not categoric in character. On the one hand, it is held by the Presiding Officer that “the application is having no merit to affix the ad-valorem court fee”. On the other hand, the impugned proceeds to indicate that “even if, at any stage during the trial of this case, the applicant/defendant succeeds to establish the requirement of affixing the ad-valorem court fee, that can be made good.” The petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Trial Court to pass a self-contained and intelligible order within seven days from the date the matter comes to be list before it. The matter shall be listed before the learned Presiding Officer on 5.2.2009. The stay order dated 14.12.2007 shall stand vacated. The vacation of stay order shall be communicated to the Court concerned forthwith. January 20, 2009 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge