THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CRP NO.53 of 2010 ORDER: This civil revision petition is filed against the order dated 3-8- 2009 passed in IA No.12 of 2009 in OS No.67 of 2006 by the Principal District Judge, Vishakapatnam District, dismissing said IA filed under Order 1, Rule 10 CPC to add the proposed party i.e. the Sub-Registrar, Bheemunipatnam as party defendant in the suit. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. Perused the impugned order passed by the Court below. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners strenuously contended that the Court below failed to appreciate the contention that defendants are tyring to alienate the suit property and if the concerned Sub-Registrar is added as party to the suit, the petitioners would be in a position to seek appropriate relief from the Court. But a perusal of the impugned order it reveals that the rights of the plaintiffs are yet to be established and it is not pointed out that there is no imminent apprehension of defendants alienating the suit property. Even otherwise, if the suit property is alienated by the defendants, the doctrine of lis pendens applies, apart from penal consequences, if an injunction order is in force as the date of the alienation. 4. In the circumstances, the civil revision petition fails and it is accordingly dismissed at the admission stage itself. ______________________ Ghulam Mohammed, J 22-1-2010 Nrg.