IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 9760 of 2008 Between: 1 Sanjay Kumar Lahoti, S/o. Laxminivas Lahoti, R/o. 22-2-722, Darushafa, Hyderabad, 2 C.Sridhar Reddy, S/o. Ramakrishna Reddy, R/o. 9-10, Medchal, Ranga Reddy District. 3 M.Shiva Shankar, S/o. Srinivas, R/o. 8-2-450, Kumariguda, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The District Collector, R.R.District, at Hyderabad. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, East Division, Attapur, R.R.District. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Shmshabad Mandal, Shamshabad, R.R.district. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not taking any action for implementtion of the proceedings No.B/584/2001 dt. 29-5-2004 and futher proceedings No.B/584/2001 dt.14.06.2005 issued by the 1st respondent, as highly illegal, arbitraryl and violative of Art.14 of the Constitution India and consequently direct the respondents to implement the proceedings of the 3rd respondent dt.14-6-2005 forthwith and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.THANDUSRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 9760 of 2008 Order: The main grievance of the petitioners in this writ petition is that though they made a representation dated 10.02.2008 requesting the 3rd respondent-Mandal Revenue Officer to implement his own orders passed on 29.05.2004 and 14.06.2005, granting succession in favour of their vendors and directing the revenue officials to restore and handover the physical and vacant possession of the land in question to them, but so far no action has been taken nor passed any orders on the said representation. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, and both of them agreed for disposal of the writ petition with the following directions: The 3rd respondent, namely the Mandal Revenue Officer, Shamshabad Mandal, is directed to consider and dispose of the representation dated 10.02.2008 of the petitioners, and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, expeditiously. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 11.06.2008 Nsr