IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN FRIDAY, THE 1ST APRIL 2011 / 11TH CHAITHRA 1933 RP.No. 141 of 2011(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGMENT/ORDER IN WP(C) NO. 29232/2009 DATED 30/08/2010 ....................... PETITIONER/3RD PARTY: ------------------------------------ SHEEBA. P.K., AGED 35 YEARS, W/O.K.V. SUNIL KUMAR, RESIDING AT KAIPADA HOUSE, PERUMPADAPPU.P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.RAMPRASAD UNNI, SMT.SMITHA GEORGE. RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS IN WP: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. NIRMALA. K., D/O.VELAPPU, AGED 34 YEARS, GDS BPM, AYIROOR. P.O., KALLATT, VELIANCODE, PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-689 612. 2. THE UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS, NEW DELHI- 110 001. 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL INSPECTOR, PONNANI SUB DIVISION, PONNANI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679 577. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POST OFFICES, TIRUR DIVISION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676 104. 5. CHIEF POST MASTER GENERAL, KERALA CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 6. POST MASTER GENERAL, NORTHERN REGION, CALICUT-673 001. R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.K.MOHAMED RAVUF. R2 TO R6 BY ADV. MR.P. PARAMESWARAN NAIR, ASST. S.G. OF INDIA. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/04/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: rs C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. .................................................................... R.P. No.141 of 2011 in W.P.(C) No.29232/2009 .................................................................... Dated this the 1st day of April, 2011. ORDER Ramachandran Nair, J. Review Petition is filed pointing out certain mistakes in the judgment in as much as this court accepted the incorrect submission of the first respondent that she was continuing as Post Master on provisional basis. In fact, she was substituted by review petitioner through a provisional selection made in 2009. According to the first respondent, the provisional selection was irregular and this court found so in the judgment. We do not think there is any need to consider the contentions raised by the review petitioner or the first respondent because through interim orders we allowed the review petitioner to continue. We are now informed that applications were invited on 27.1.2011 for making regular selection to the post of Post Master in the very same Post Office. It is open to all aspirants including the review petitioner and the first respondent to apply for the post. The present R.P. 141/2011 2 arrangement of the review petitioner as Post Master on provisional basis will continue until fresh selection is made. So far as experience is concerned, the experience of both the review petitioner and the first respondent should be considered while considering them for selection. Review Petition is disposed of modifying the judgment to the above extent. As and when a person is selected on regular basis, such person would be appointed to the post. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge K.SURENDRA MOHAN Judge pms