THE HONBLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.1982 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in compliance with the interim order dated 4.02.2008, petitioner’s application was received and considered by the respondents. Hence, no further enquiry is necessary. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. However, this shall not preclude the petitioner to ﬁle a fresh writ petition in case he is aggrieved by the selection made. No costs. 14.10.2008. Kgr IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No: 1982 of 2008 Between: Punna Ramalingam S/o P.Rama Lakshmaiah, Raspo House, 11-20-4/33, HUDA Complex, Kothapet Hyderabad-5000 35. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited rep by its Chairman/Managing Director Regd. Off: 17, Jamshedji Tata Road, Mumbai-400020. 2 The Senior Regional Manager, Hindustan petroleum Corporation Limited, Post Box No.2, HCL Post Office Cherlapally, Hyderabad-500051. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the 2nd respondent representing the 1st respondent in rejecting the petitioner's application for LPG Distribution, ship for location Chowtuppal, Nalgonda district as arbitrary, irrational, discriminatory and unwarranted in the facts and circumstances of the case and pass such other or further order or orders as the Hon'ble Court deems ﬁt and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. V.HARI HARAN Counsel for the Respondents: MR.THOOMSRINIVAS The Court made the following: