IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P. No.191 of 2008 Date of Decision:- 08.02.2008 Gurpreet Singh ....Petitioner(s) through Mr.Tarunveer Vashisth, Advocate vs. Rulda Singh Sub Inspector & ors. ....Respondent(s) *** CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. *** 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? *** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging that his brother has been falsely implicated in a case under Sections 15/61/85 of the N.D.P.S.Act by the respondents who are police officials of Police Station, Khanori District Sangrur and that while implicating him, the respondents have violated the undertaking given by Harcharan Singh Bhullar, Assistant Inspector General, Government Railway Police, Punjab in his affidavit dated 14.9.2005 which was filed by him before this Court in Crl.Misc.No.30579-M of 2003 and Crl.Misc.No.4494-M of 1997. To be precise, it is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that despite an undertaking given before this Court that private vehicles shall not be used by the police officials for conducting raid etc. in respect of the offence under the NDPS Act, his brother has been arrested in the subject F.I.R in which a private vehicle is stated to have been used by C.O.C.P. No.191 of 2008 -2- the police officials. I have perused the aforesaid affidavit filed by the Assistant Inspector General, Government Railway Police, Punjab and have also taken notice of the backdrop in which the same was filed. No case to initiate the contempt proceedings is made out. Dismissed. February 08, 2008 ( SURYA KANT ) poonam JUDGE