=T XI-HC—78 ^n^r ^T'f^rN^ Tr^n a^?T »)^ier> ^TRC'IT th*1ict» 7^r';^T£TRT3[r, ^ti1^4Ko/i®Kni^y ^-^w./?.^a.^.&/.a.c)...............^2003 3TT^?T TT^r! (l?^^) ^?TI'W Trft^ a?n^T Sinale Bench: Hon'ble w.p.rci N (Petition under Article 2^6 Petitioner : Prataprai S/<| R/o Telibandha (C.G.) Vs Nagar Respondent 26.3.2009 Commission Mr. Sanjay Shyam Agarwal, Mr. Sanjay K Agarwal, Advc|< for the respondent: Heard. Bythe instant petition under the petitioner is praying for direct|on extend benefit as per their own lette| Learned counsel for the peti| be disposed of in terms of the ob^ Court in W.P. (c) No.1118/2009 (J^c Nigam, Raipur) decided on 26.3.^ Learned counsel for the objection ifthe instant petition is dis^ In view of above, the instant order dated 26.3.2009 passed by (Jagdeo Singh Garcha Vs. Nagar P^ Consequently, I.A. No.1 also | Certified copy as per rules. cr)i^f<n<fli 'WT^if ^*"fec<rt ^R5R ^T3TRm3^?r usticeDhirendra Mishra .1253/2009 :6 of Constitution of India) Late Shri Bodhamal, aged 69 years, i, Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur k Nigam, Raipur, Through ', Nagar Palik Nigam, Raipur (CG) dvocate for the petitioner. cate with Mr. K. Shakeel, Advocate ^rticle 226 of the Constitution of India to the respondent authorities to •dated 1.2.2009 (Annexure P-4). ;ioners submits that this petition may |ervafions & directions given by this jgdeo Singh Garcha Vs. Nagar Palik .20C|9. re^pondent submits that they have no tosed of in the aforesaid terms. |3etitipn is disposed of in terms ofthe fiis Court in W.P. (c) No.1118/2009 (likNjgam, Raipur). 1 |stands disposed of. Sd/- Db.rend»aMisbra Judge ^