XLHC-22 '\,' 30/01/2006 Shri Stikumar Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Shri Anand Knmar Gupta, Oounsel for the appellant. Leaxhed counsel for the appallant submits that this appEétl has been prefeITed against the inten'm4 award passed on 03/09] 2002 in Claim Case No.46/99 and subsequently the claim case has been decided on merit d iinal awald has been passed. He further submits that Misce eous Appeal No.748/2004 is pehding in this High Court ag st the hnal award in the case, therefore, this appeal has become infructuous. Considered. In View of the aboveisubmi ion made by learned counsel for the appellant, this appeal’is dispo sed of as inkuctous. V.K. Shrivastava a Ax Judge Sdl— ‘ raJu