IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 2077 of 2010. Date of Decision: 30th November, 2011. _______________________________________________________ Jiwan Singh .. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and another. .. Respondents. Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surinder Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. A.K. Bansal, Additional Advocate General. _________________________________________________________ Surinder Singh, J (Oral). Precisely, the case of the petitioner is that being ex-army personnel, he was not offered the appointment by the respondent-Department within the stipulated period, as per the sponsorship letter of the Ex-servicemen Cell, thus he was deprived of the benefit of pension under the CCS (Pension), Rules. It is also submitted that the case of the petitioner is similarly situated to that of decision rendered by this Court on 26.7.2011 in CWP No.2059 of 2010: Hirdye Prakash v. State of HP and another. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner feels satisfied if this petition be treated as representation by the respondent-department to decide the same keeping in view Hirdey Prakash’s judgment supra. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner shall file a representation to the second respondent within a period of two weeks annexing the copy of this petition along with annexures thereto, after obtaining the copy of this judgment/order and in case the petitioner is similarly situate the second respondent shall take a final decision within two months thereafter keeping in view the judgment of Hirdye Prakash’s case supra. 4. With these directions, the writ petition stands disposed of and so also the pending application, if any. November 30, 2011. (Surinder Singh), (rc) Judge.