^ ^> 1 c -Ffpc Page No. •.,.••<.••» IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION No. \.j^\\ /2001 UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Vs. 1. Mahipal Prasad Sahu s/o Late K»C. Sahu aged 51 years occupation service Assistant Engineer, C.S.E.B., r/o Quarter No. N-C-59, C.S.E.B. Colony Korba East/District Korba Chhattisgarh. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board,through Chief Engineer B.R. Bilaspur Region, C.S.E.B* Office Tifra^Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ^' %^ ^i \^ •••^ ^" il>f^^ddl. Superintending Engineer •• ,^^ ( 0/M), Division, C.S.E.B. Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh. [ lr. XI-HC-22 3'IT^T'^T K?lNr 3Tl^T ^^W^lta 3/ •T^ ? ^ftOT^, $l.'^ot.!^4/200l '^TO^rww^'"""""""""*"*""""""^'^^ 2(M) '^^y' sn^ ^nw Trftcf 2/8/2001 Shri AloM Bakshi, shri RoSo Jaiawal, Heard® learbied leairned Q R_D_El T&e o^der impugsied ia Idate^ 12/7/2Q01 on the grcund ^^V^^!^ o^l ailmento Howevee, since Ande? the petitioner is willing t^ ^^P^ ^pj^f -i^ TS^ ^TZK '^ 3TRHJ -3TC?T coansel for the petitioner^ ca&nsel foc the respon^tents^ R that th@ initial orcter of trjaii@fer issued on 9/7/2001 was to the effectithat^thepetitlionerwouldb@posted as AeE at Ambikaptir» By the segue^t order in partittl modification l-^lllt^ of t»h@ earlier ordey^the pdtitApner has been posted as A^2o at Pathalgaoda Mre Alok Bakshi> lear^ed counsel for the petitionea: sytomit^ fehat. there l^ n©re^son w-hy.within fchree day8 afte^ tbe first order was issued 4» 9/'?/200! another order of •fcrasi^fer shcmld have.; been isjsued.by the CCTspetent Aufehority<i It is furtber sutomit.ted by ^r» Alolc Bakshi, that tte petitioraer As suff@ring from Pyrexla a^d Ble@ding P/R» According to Me, Baiisbio tber®are facilttiies at Korba for^the aforesaid 1 ilcapir is not so far from Korba^ go to Ambikapur as he was ordered to do so by the earlier c^cter e^f 9/7/2001^ However^ it is submitted fehat since ^here is no facility vfor trearaent. ,o2 [•-^ ^i-^^ ii'11 v~^ T ^n^i^i 1^W3TT^r ?rT^?NTTrf^T 3TF^?T 1^r^E ( ^f^5r??T ) ^fT^T ^~RT[^R ^fiTf '<wrf<7f4h ~^\^ ^ ftrzt ^HZR ^^^R 3^1 lt Pathalgaon^ the petitioBer \t imp^gned order issued @B and & direction may be issaed |ted at Asitoikapur^ larned counsel foc the re@pond§sifc@ tr has alr@a'dy @@r^ed at Korba [ is attomitted that isi ^ioxier holds a transferable postg, b<^^vv^ of the aforesaid ailment 4 aubmit®that the sutoseq^e^ 12/7/200l raay be set-asid^ that the p@tition@r b@ pe^ Mr»R.s»Jaiswal, 1< submits that the petition^ for about seven yeara^ I^ of service ©itt'eethe petil ^k-^4 the ~of traa@fe^ftW3P^e •iss<aed» As regarcte the ficatioa in the.©rder-@f^Iransfe2r-£ra% ARtoikaptar to Pathalga@Bg, it is sybmitted by Mr <» R ^^^^swsil s l@atfr&e<a cousisel for respondente that this mocii^ieation eannot said to be inalafide inassstich as it is forthe! modlficatioxi ©rdero It ii ferring tbe petitiones: fr^m Korba to Pathalgaoii^ the ^tatuuB aa regards thea ervice -of and the petitiox®^cannot th@ modtfied orQer of tra^sfer, X have perused th@ Hedical Offieer^ Korba» necessary» the petitlor^r auch treatinexitlpv3tt is not Competeat Authority feo make @ueh farther submitted tl-a t by trans<8 the wrifc petitton@2: is xiot -take parttcular grievance against medical certificate issued by the :t appears that If treatssent ^ ;^ ' can certainly g@ to any place fcr that once he is po@ted at Pathalgaosi ^z.^fc"", lereelse if facilities are^avail^le ^" he cannot be treafced some< ^tksl^c'^^ at/i^mtoiilchp^r^ So far as cfaestion @f feransfer is coneer^ed^ that tinleaa it is shown^fehe or^er of transfer has b©enissjqpd GRPRJ—FS/311—1/2001—50,000. + 4 . /«- XI-HC-22 •^^ i, ^flTm^/f^ray IWT^T^^I^ "WI '^•^y' ssns o * <? ®® saalafide or isi contravention this.jCourt is not incliiied t4 order of transfer* I take ttt a©a normal order of transfetf Zn the result^ thi^ '^'FWPTH ^3TRT;Tf ^ f^t T^P^TT ^ STT^R ^T^T to eertain statutory riale@» interfere with the norm^l .e present order of tra wnsf@r in.the of ^ervice^ petition is rejectedo Let the writ petitioner canply with the ar dey of tranafer immediately® I faope that th4 Department shatl not create any iBconvenience ^& the wri^ petitioner as regards the period bet% en the of traaafer and the date of Joinisig® Mr^ Jaiswa&^ Jatned coansel fo^ the 3:es£»ndegit@ sutoBiifcs that no diffieulty w4.il be faced by thewrit petitio2»£ in this regard<» Cesrtified e©pyto ^oth tbe parties Sd/- Chief Justice ['^ '^3 !IA!..-^ '-\^s