IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3187 of 2009 NEELAM KUMARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 17.3.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. While this Court would not entertain the first part of the prayer of the petitioner as with regard to quashing of the order dated 6.1.2009, inasmuch the petitioner has statutory alternative remedy of approaching the District Appellate Tribunal, but at the same time it would definitely look into the second part of the grievance of the petitioner that she must be paid salary for the period she had admittedly worked. That being so, this writ application is disposed of with the direction to the competent authority to make payment of salary of the petitioner for the period work was taken from her if there is no dispute in respect of her working. Such payment, if admissible, must be made to the petitioner within a period of four months from the date of receipt/ production of a 2 copy of this order. This application, accordingly, stands disposed of. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/