IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4387 of 2008 KHURSHID ALAM @ MINTU MIAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 5.5.2008 Heard counsel for the parties. In view of the fact that name of the petitioner was initially not given by the informant in the F.I.R. or his further statement as an assailant and only later on the name of the petitioner has been introduced as an assailant, it thus appears to be a case of implication of the petitioner by way of second thought at the instance of the informant and his family members. It has come in paragraph 79,80 and 81 of the case diary that the deceased was a veteran criminal and a wanted accused in large number of cases. Thus taking all these facts into consideration , this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner(Khurshid Alam @ Mintu Mian) on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in Siwan Town P.S. Case no.158/05.One of the bailer must be government servant and other mother or wife of the petitioner. shahid (Mihir Kumar Jha,J)