SB Crlmb No.7016/10. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B.CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.7016/2010. Naresh Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order : July 27, 2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Sanjay Gangwar for petitioner. Shri Amit Poonia, Public Prosecutor for State. Shri G.S. Fauzdar for complainant-JVVNL. ****** Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State as well as learned counsel for complainant-JVVNL and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for petitioner is that allegation against the petitioner is one under Section 136 of the Electricity Act for theft of 2.5 Kg. of Copper Wire. Co-accused Rambharos and Kallu have already been released on bail vide orders dated 15/12/2009 and 3/2/2010 passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B.Cr.Misc.Bail Application Nos.10141/2009 and 294/2010, respectively. There is only one more previous case registered against the petitioner. He would undertake not to indulgence in similar offence in future. Trial will take time. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. SB Crlmb No.7016/10. 2 Considering the submissions made at the bar, the nature of accusation, the materials on record and all other facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. In the result, this bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Naresh S/o Shri Badri Lal shall be released on bail in FIR No.147/2009 P.S. Bapcha, District Baran for offence u/S.136 of the Electricity Act on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing until conclusion of the trial. However, in case the petitioner is again found indulging in similar or any other offence at any point of time in future, the bail granted to him by this court in the present case and in other two pending cases against him, would be liable to be cancelled at the instance of the prosecution on this ground alone and stipulation to this effect shall be inserted in the bail bonds produced by the petitioner, and the sureties to be produced in support thereof shall be verified by the Tehsildar of the area concerned. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil