IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.7314 of 2010 Date of Decision : July 14, 2010. M/s Home Service Enterprises .....Petitioner versus Union of India and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Ashu Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner's LPG distributorship was cancelled way back on 24.3.2004 (Annexure P-2) on account of gross malpractices. An FIR No.5 dated 6.1.2004 under Sections 4 to 10 of the Essential Commodities Act read with Section 420 IPC was also registered against the petitioner. After acquittal from the criminal case, the petitioner seeks restoration of the LPG distributorship. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and after going through the impugned order, I do not find any ground to interfere with the same except to direct respondent No.3 to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 25.3.2010 (Annexure P-5) in C.W.P.No .7314 of 2010 2 accordance with their Policy, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. July 14, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE