1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Criminal Writ Petition No. 682 of 2008 [Chandrashekhar N. Suke Vs. State of Mah. & ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. R.P. Thote, Adv., for the petitioner. Mrs. B.H. Dangre, Addl. Public Prosecutor for respondent nos. 1 to 3. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND R.C. CHAVAN, JJ. DATE : 9th February, 2009. 1. Heard learned Adv. Mr. R.P. Thote for the petitioner and learned Addl. Public Prosecutor Mrs. Dangre for respondent nos. 1 to 3. 2. We find that the Writ Petition has been filed without taking proper recourse to complaint to higher authorities. 3. Filing of a charge-sheet during pendency of petition would not come in the way of higher officers, and in particular respondent no.2, in getting himself satisfied as to whether there are any deficiencies in the investigation, and if other accused persons involved in the crime are left out from the investigation. 4. Petitioner is, thus, free to make a detailed complaint to respondent no.2. We need not issue directions, since in the event such complaint is received, the Superintendent of 2 Police would consider such complaint on its own merits and take action thereon by proper application of mind. 5. Petition is disposed of. Judge Judge |Hedau|