1 SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.209 OF 2010 Dhirajlal D. Fotaria ...Applicant. v/s. Kulbirsingh Sahani and Anr. ...Respondents. Mr. G.V.Nagarshesh , adv. For the Applicant. Mrs. Mallika Ingale, adv. For the Respondent No.1. Shri V.B.Konde, APP for the R.No.2/State. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : MARCH 17, 2011. P.C. 1 Application is filed by the complainant against the order of the acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act passed by the Sessions Court in appeal, while setting aside the conviction. The learned counsel for the accused/respondent makes a statement that the accused /respondent no.1 has deposited an amount of Rs.30,000/- on 6.6.2006 before the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate Esplanade Court and that the amount is more than cheque amount. The learned counsel states that accused has no objection if the complainant is allowed to withdraw that money. In view of this, the learned counsel for the complainant on taking instructions makes a statement that he will not like to press his revision application. 2 2 In view of the above, revision application stands disposed off as not pressed. However, the complainant shall be allowed to withdraw the amount of Rs.30,000/- deposited by the accused before the Metropolitan Magistrate 28th Court, Esplanade in case no.328/S/2003. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)