IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.7279 of 2010 1. IDRISH MIAN son of Rayazuddin Mian 2. Ranglal Yadav son of Mahadeo Yadav Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 12.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Section 366 A of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner no.1 submits that in fact all the five abducted persons returned after four days. He further submits that they do not name the petitioner, as an accused. The petitioner is in custody since 14 months. He further submits that some co-accused have already been granted bail. Counsel for the state submits that apart from informant, two more witnesses have identified the petitioner. The petitioner is also accused in as many as 11 cases. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner no.1 for the present. His prayer for bail is rejected. However, he may renew his prayer for bail after six months. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)