WP(C) 593/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.D.AGARWAL With the consent of the learned counsel for both the sides, this writ petition i s being disposed of at the admission stage itself. Heard Sri Z Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri S Khound, learn ed counsel appearing for the respondents No. 2, 4 and 5 and Sri BN Gogoi, learne d Govt. Advocate for the State respondents. Private respondent Nos.7 and 8 have not appeared. Only grievance of the writ petitioner is that respondent Nos. 7 and 8, namely, S mt Rousana Khatun and Smt Jeleka Khatun, respectively, have been appointed as An ganwadi Worker and Helper respectively at Panijani Ghop Anganwadi centre, altho ugh they are not local residents from the said village. In the case of Chitrawati Patgiri & Ors - Vs- State of Assam & Ors; reported in 2011(3) GLT 334, identical issues were raised by the writ petitioners. The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the writ petitioners to file a repr esentation before the concerned authority who will examine the dispute in consul tation with the Deputy Commissioner. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the wr it petitioners to file a representation before the Joint Secretary, Social Welfa re Department, BTC, Kokrajhar who shall dispose of the writ petition upon hearin g the writ petitioners and respondent Nos. 7 and 8, Smt Rousana Khatun and Smt J eleka Khatun, and also after obtaining report from the Deputy Commissioner. The representation shall be disposed of within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the same. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.