@y viémi’i'm Q”: m haw In the Honble High Court 0f Chhatishgarh at Bilaspur (C.G.) @A/ (3 $8 o W W.P. No 2004 Petitioner .................... Sushil Kumar Shrivastava age 55 years son of late Shri G.N.Shrivastava, District Prosecution Officer, Durg (C.G.) Versus Respondents ............ (1) The State Government of Chhattishgarh Through the Secretary, Home Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Writ Petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India @ WWWW w PNo Sago 2’04‘ WW m zoo animw (13W) mWm WXWWiifgétm *qvaimm GZJ 1.2904 Shri Ajay Sln‘ivasmva, calms vpl for tha petititmar. Shri UNS. D50, Govt. Advdcaie for the State. Application for urgent healii‘ g is allowed. Heard. Liamed counsel 'fér the peti‘tioner gubmits 111a: $316 matier 1‘61ates :0 transfer of the petitionar. He fur‘ r submits that the pe‘dtioner has been He also wbmit‘: that the petitioner is transfm od due to polmual mom a1 on He also Shbmlts that f0; the mesem the potmonei maV be cweia a1 opportumtv of fximg the de’mkd representa‘ilon before the comoetefi authomy 01' the respondenm “hm shzd} be coasidered on its own mer in accordance with iaw. t expressing my opinion on the merits urt. ends ofjustioe will be served if a éireotion is given to the petitioner make a oetailed representation raising his grievances before the eompeten authority of the respondents along with a copy of the petition and this Aorcier, within 10 days, aod on such rapiesemation being tile-d, the con > etent authority of the respondents shah decide the some on its own mer s in accordance with law a», early as possibie preferably Within six tramfemed thrge timas in two ya d e i :‘ Having comidered and wit of the case, in the opinion of this o ks from the ae of reecipt of the representation. It is made clear t if any grievance still remaine, the \P \\ \ kmooo. etitioner may avail-the remedy av ilztble under the law. \ \\ \\ m a h u c e w m 1MP. N0. 33802004 Wm an?“m (W) @ m 200 mmm -2- Whm wm amifemim also submits that the petitioner has not Counsel for the petitioner been reHeved so far. He pray$ for syay oftransf€r order. In visw of tha facts and Cir if the petitioner is not relievad rspresema‘iion is dacided. With the aforesaid o‘bsewati Conssquexmy MWPNO. 4 Celtiflad copy as per mles. :ums‘tances of the case, it i3 dirocted that ’ ha be allowsd to continue tiH the ons, this petition stands disposed of. 379/2004 akso stands disposed of. / Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge