#41 12 .01.2011 Present: Petitioner in person with Mr.R.S.Sharma, Advocate. Ms.Fizani Husain, APP for the State/respondent with 10 SI Sandeep Kumar, P.S. Jahangir Pun. Respondent No. 2 inperson with Mr. Mohd. Yusuf, Advocate. +CrI.M.A. 281/2011 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptjons. Application stands disposed of. CrI.M.C. 57/2011 & CrI.M.A.280/2011 (stay) Mahinder Singh, the petitioner herein vide instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is seeking quashing of FIR No. 644/2000 under Section 498A/406/34 IPC registered at P.S. Jahangir Purl on the complaint of the - respondent No. 2. The ground for seeking quashing is that the parties have amicably settled the matter during the matrimonial proceedings and now, there is no dispute left between them. Copy of the terms of settlement in the form of joint statement of petitioner and respondent No. 2 recorded by the Matrimonial Court is annexed to the petition Petitioner is present in person. He is identified by his counsel Sh. R.S.Sharma, Advocate. Respondent No. 2 Hem Lata is also present. She is identified by her counsel Sh. Mohd. Yusuf, Advocate as well as the Investigating Officer SI Sandeep Kumar, P.S. Jahangir Pun. Signing Date:14.08.2024 17:17:56 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified Petitioner as well as respondent No. 2 submits that they have arrived at an amicable settlement and as per the terms of settlement, parties have decided to take consent divorce and petitioner has agreed to pay a sum of Z 2,50,000/- to respondent No. 2 in full and final settlement of her claim relating to the 'Stree dhan', permanent alimony and past maintenance etc. Respondent No. 2 states that she has settled the matter with the petitioner of her own accord without any undue influence or pressure from any corner and out of the agreed amount, she has already received 1,50,000/- and remaining Z 1,00,000/- has been paid to her today in the court through three Pay Orders bearing Nos. 854661 for Z 49,000/-, 854662 for Z 49,000/- & 854663 for Z 2000/-, all dated 12.01.2011 drawn on UCO Bank, Delhi High Court Branch, New Delhi. She further states that now, there is no dispute left between her and the petitioner and thus, she does not want any action against the petitioner on her FIR and she has no objection if the FIR as well as the proceedings arising out the same is quashed. She states that she has already withdrawn her petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. Learned Ms. Fizani Husain, APP submits that since the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement, the State has no objection if the present FIR as well as the proceedings arising out of the same is quashed. Since the parties have amicably settled the matter and now, there is no dispute left, I feel that no useful purpose will be served in keeping this matter alive. Accordingly, FIR No. 644/2000 under Section 498A/406/34 IPC registered at P.S. Jahangir Puri and proceedings emanating fro same are hereby quashed. Petition along with miscellaneous application are disposed of accordingly. (AJIT BHARIHOKE) JUDGE JANUARY 12, 2011 a kb 0 1- 4