IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3394 of 2011 YOGI MANDAL & ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 11.03.2011 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in Pratapganj P.S. Case No. 46 of 2009 registered under Section 366(A)/34 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that the three persons had tried to abduct the daughter of the informant. One person was caught on the spot but two others were escaped from the scene. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that admittedly the victim was not abducted, hence, no case under Section 366A of the I.P.C. is made out. Let learned court-below i.e. S.D.J.M., Birpur consider the regular bail application of the petitioners namely, Yogi Mandal and Rajesh Mandal, keeping in mind that the petitioners were not apprehended on the spot. Their name sprang up on the statement of apprehended co-accused and the actual abduction has not taken place and both informant and petitioner are co-villagers and it 2 appears that due to some grudge the case has been lodged, and tried to dispose of the regular bail application preferably on the same day if the petitioners surrender before the Court-below within a period of four weeks. With the above observation, this application is disposed off. Mkr. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)