IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 94 OF 2011 IN SUO MOTU WRIT PETITION NO. 2 OF 2007 BABLO R. KAVLEKAR ... Applicant Versus QUEPEM MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THROUGH CHIEF OFFICER AND ORS., ... Respondents Mr. R. Gawas, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms. N. Alvares, Amicus Curiae. Mr. N.K. Sawaikar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. P. Talaulikar, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, Senior Advocate with Mr. D. Lawande, Advocate for Respondent No.3. Coram:- S.B. DESHMUKH & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 25th January, 2011 P.C.: Heard learned Counsel for respective parties. 2. Counsel appearing for the applicant points out undertaking given in para 11 of the miscellaneous civil application. Undertaking given by the applicant is accepted. 3. We have considered earlier orders passed by this Court in similar circumstances, wherein the local body is Municipal Council. Counsel appearing for respective respondents have brought to our notice the nature of the Suo Motu Writ Petition No.2/2007. Construction within the limits of local body as a Municipal Council or Village Panchayat, is to be regulated by a local body concerned in accordance with the provisions of law. We have noticed that various applicants/citizens have moved this Court seeking permission from this Court in view of the orders passed by this Court in Suo Motu Writ Petition No.2/2007, after hearing learned Counsel for respective parties. In our opinion, exercise which is to be undertaken by the local bodies in accordance with the provisions of law is not been properly carried out and for this reason applicants/citizens are required to approach this Court. Since we have passed earlier orders in similar circumstances, in this application also we are inclined to pass similar order. However, henceforth local bodies concerned shall have to bear the costs which may be imposed by this Court after considering the submissions of the Counsel appearing for the respective parties. 4. In the case at hand, we have accepted the undertaking given by the applicant in para 11. We are inclined to allow this application. Civil application is allowed in terms of para (a) and disposed of. S.B. DESHMUKH, J. F. M. REIS, J. NH