THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.M.A. No.329 of 2001 JUDGMENT: The appellant is the petitioner in E.A.No.221 of 1999 in E.P.No.4 of 1993 in O.S.No.29 of 1991 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Srikalahasthi. E.A.No.221 of 1999 was dismissed for default on 27.07.2000. For restoration of the same, the appellant filed E.A.No.150 of 2000. The executing Court dismissed the E.A. on 24.10.2000, on the ground that there was no representation for the appellant. The same is challenged in this appeal. During the pendency of the appeal, the first respondent i.e. the decree holder died on 04.11.2002. His counsel Sri M.S.R.Subrahmanyam filed a Memo as required under Order 22 Rule 10-A C.P.C. way back on 03.03.2004 stating that the first respondent died leaving behind him his son, by name N.Govindarajlu, and wife, G.Durga Devi. The Memo was served upon the counsel for the appellant. No steps were taken for the past five years. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:26.08.2009 kdl