Criminal Revision No. 725 of 1999 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Criminal Revision No. 725 of 1999 Date of Decision: 5.3.2009 Inderjeet Kaur …Petitioner Versus Anil Kumar and Others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Durga Dutt Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate for the Petitioner. None for the respondents. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) The present revision petition has been filed by Inderjeet Kaur daughter of Manmohan Singh. Inderjeet Kaur is a complainant. On statement made by her, case FIR No. 162 dated 11.5.1991 was registered at Police Station Sadar, Kaithal, under Section 323, 506, 148 & 149 IPC. She had named eight persons as accused. Ram Kumar accused had died during the trail. Trial Court came to conclusion that Siya Ram and Narender Kumar, accused, are guilty of offence under Sections 323, 506 & 34 IPC. Remaining accused, namely Anil Kumar, Jaswinder Kumar, Nirmala, Savita and Darshana were acquitted. Siya Ram and Narender Kumar had filed an appeal in the Court of the Sessions Judge, Kaithal, Criminal Revision No. 725 of 1999 2 against their conviction. The present revision petition has been filed against the acquittal of Anil Kumar, Jaswinder Kumar, Nirmala, Savita and Darshana. Accused Siya Ram and Narender Kumar were sentenced under Section 323 read with Section 34 IPC to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- each, in default whereof to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month. They were also sentenced to undergo three months rigorous imprisonment under Section 506 read with Section 34 IPC. Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrent. Occurrence in the present case had taken place on 10.5.1991. 18 years are going to elapse. The trial Court had granted benefit of doubt to the acquitted accused/respondents. No patent illegality or irregularity to assail acquittal of these accused/respondent has been pointed out by counsel for the Petitioner. State has not opted to file an appeal against their acquittal. Hence, no interference is warranted and the present petition is dismissed. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge March 5, 2009 “DK”