IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1632 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11443 of 2011 ====================================================== Tabbsum Ara @ Tabassum Aran, W/O Awarul Ansari, R/O Village- Gidha, P.S.- Chanpatia, District- West Champaran. .... Petitioner .... Appellant Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Director of Education Department of Human Development Resources, Bihar, Patna. 3. District Magistrate, West Champaran. 4. The Block Development Officer, Chanpatia, District- West Champaran. 5. The Sukh Subidha Committee Panchayat Raj, Gidha, Block Chanpatia, District- West Champaran. 6. The School Siksha Samittee, Panchayat Gidha, Block Chanpatia, District- West Champaran. 7. Mukhiya of the Gram Panchayat Gidha Block, Chanpatai, District- West Champaran. 8. Panchayat Secretary, Gidha, Block Chanpatia, District- West Champaran. .... Respondents.... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Siddhartha Prasad, A.C. to A.A.G-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 2 15-11-2011 The appellant-writ petitioner has preferred this Appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent to challenge the order dated 5th September 2011 made by the learned single Judge in above CWJC No. 11443 of 2011. The Appellant claims that pursuant to 2005 Patna High Court LPA No.1632 of 2011 (2) dt.15-11-2011 2 / 2 2 selection process, she was selected for appointment as Panchayat Shiksha Mitra in Village Gidha, Block Chanpatia, District West Champaran. However, she was not appointed as Panchayat Shiksha Mitra. She, therefore, approached the District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, West Champaran, Bettiah in Complaint Case No.261 of 2009. The said complaint was rejected by the authority below. The order of the authority below is confirmed by the learned Single Judge. Therefore, the present Appeal. In view of our judgment in the matter of Smt. Renu Kumari Pandey and Ors. Vs. the State of Bihar [2011 (4) PLJR 297], the claim of the appellant is not sustainable. Appeal is dismissed in limine. B. Tiwary/ Anjani/- (R.M. Doshit, CJ) (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)