IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI ANIL R. DAVE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 345 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 22/02/2008 in WP NO : 3658 OF 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Mohd.Ghouse khan S/o. Late Khaja Moinuddin Khan R/o. H.No.18-2-614, Falaknuma, Hyderabad. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 The State of AP., rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector & District Magistrate, Nizamabad. 3 The Revenue Divisional officer, Bhodan Mandal Nizamabad District. 4 The Thasildar/.Mandal Revenue officer, Bhodan Mandal, Nizamabad District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant: MR. SYED SHAREEF AHMED Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : JUDGMENT Per Anil R. Dave, CJ When the matter is taken up for admission, the learned Advocate appearing for the appellant has fairly submitted that the appellant would not like to proceed with the appeal and would like to withdraw the appeal if the same is disposed of with a direction to notify the writ petition itself for final hearing at an early date. In the circumstances, it is open to the learned counsel for the appellant to make an application before the learned Single Judge for early hearing of the Writ Petition. We are sure that if the learned counsel for the appellant makes such an application, the learned Single Judge will consider the prayer of the appellant for expeditious hearing of the writ petition as per law. The appeal is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ 2nd April, 2008 R. SUBHASH REDDY, J vtv