IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. WRIT PETITION NO. 1154 OF 2004 Nalini Ramakant Shukla. ...Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr. R.A. Shaikh for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents. ..... CORAM : DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J. & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. September 28, 2004. P.C.: Admittedly a suit is pending in the trial Court. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the auction purchaser has expired and he is not able to get details of the legal heirs and so he chose to prefer this writ petition. We do not see good reasons or justification for invoking extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court in a matter of this nature. Writ Petition being devoid of any merit deserves to be dismissed. However, the Petitioner would be at liberty to take appropriate steps in the suit which is pending before the trial Court. Consequently, the Writ Petition is dismissed. CHIEF JUSTICE DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.