1 conp60-10.sxw pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Contempt Petition No. 60 of 2010 in Writ Petition No.2631 of 2005 Goldie Purshottam Sud .. Petitioner v/s. The Municipal Corporation of Gr. Bombay & Ors. ..Respondents Petitioner in person Ms.T.H.Puranik for the B.M.C. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 11th February, 2011 P.C. : 1. The petitioner appeared in person. He informed the Court that he has discharged the advocate by name Ms. Priyadarshani Redkar and he wants to appear in person. 2. The petition is filed by Mr. Goldie P. Sud singly. According to the petitioner, he had taken out Chamber Summons No.367 of 2010 for being joined as party petitioner along with the petitioners namely 2 conp60-10.sxw Gazebo Restaurant and Departmental Stores Pvt. Ltd. and another. He submitted that the respondents have committed contempt and that is how the petition is filed. A perusal of the Order dated 16.7.2008 in regard to which the contempt is alleged indicates that the Chamber Summons was disposed of. On reading the said order I hold that the petitioner’s Chamber Summons for being joined as party petitioner was not granted. If this be so, the present petitioner cannot make a grievance that the Order dated 16.7.2008 has been violated by the concerned officers. If at all the order has been violated the persons who were accepted as petitioners can make a grievance about it. Surely, reading the order dated 16.7.2008 it cannot be said that the present petitioner was accepted as party petitioner in Writ Petition No.2631 of 2005. If that would have been so, there would have been a specific sentence in the order dated 16.7.2008. In view of this, the petition is not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. [R.Y.GANOO, J.]