IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 20798 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.9.2011 Devinder Singh @ Rinku .. Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Amit Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K. S. Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. ... Rajesh Bindal J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the only injury attributed to the petitioner in the present case is on the arm of the complainant with kirpan, which was found to be simple in nature. The petitioner is in custody since 16.11.2010. The accused, to whom grievous injury under Section 326 IPC has been attributed, is in custody. The aforesaid facts are not disputed by learned counsel for the State. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid facts, in my opinion, the petitioner deserves concession of bail pending trial. He is directed to be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Ludhiana. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 26.9.2011 mk