IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.426 of 2008 RAM KUMAR SINGH, SON OF LATE RAM BAHADUR SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BAKARGANJ, P.S.- LAHERIASARAI, DISTRICT- DARBHANGA. ……………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH COMMISSIONER- CUMSECRETARY OF THE HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR. 2. THE MISHRI LAL THAKUR, VICE-CHANCELLOR OF L.N.MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA. 3. NARESH KUMAR JHA, REGISTRAR OF L.N.MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA. ………………OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 8 27.11.2008 When the case was taken up on 25.11.2008, no one appeared for the petitioner. Today also no one appears for the petitioner. Pursuant to the order dated 25.11.2008, a copy of the supplementary show cause has been served in the office of the learned Advocate General. Learned Government Advocate No. 1 appears. Along with the supplementary show cause, requisition along with detailed calculation chart in respect of dues of the petitioner has been annexed as Annexure-C, which is addressed to Additional Commissioner-cum-Secretary Department of Human Resources Department (Higher Education). Learned Government Advocate No. 1 submits that since the requisition has been sent by the University to the Department in proper form with all details and calculations, the same shall be considered by the Department. He submits that although he has not been served with a copy of the writ petition 2 neither he was served with a copy of the contempt application, he will communicate the contents of the supplementary show cause and the requisition and calculation filed by the University with the same to the authorities of the Government for consideration and appropriate decision. Now that the University has sent the requisition to the State Government in respect of the dues of the petitioner with all details and calculations, it is expected that the State Government shall consider the same, verify the calculations and claims and shall release the admissible amount to the University in the name of the petitioner for payment of same to the petitioner at an early date. With the above observations and directions, this contempt application is disposed of. Let a copy of this order be served in the office of learned Government Advocate No. 1. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh , J. )