CLCON No. 43 of 2011 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. L.K. Verma, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Brief Holder for the respondents. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, the Court finds that the order of the writ court has been complied by the opposite parties. A Division Bench of this Court by an order dated 14/12/2010 directed the Departmental Promotion Committee to consider the case of the petitioner and give effect to it, if any, w.e.f. 30th November, 2010. Thereafter, a review application was filed by the respondents-State which was rejected by an order dated 5th May, 2011. Subsequently, the D.P.C. was held on 2nd June, 2011 and the case of the petitioner was considered and rejected. The D.P.C. found that the petitioner was not eligible for promotion as he was junior to other persons. The submission of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the seniority of the petitioner has not been considered from the date of the allocation but has been considered from the date of consent and, therefore, the recommendation of the D.P.C. is patently illegal. Be that as it may. This Court is not concerned with the validity and the legality of the recommendation made by the Committee. If the applicant is aggrieved by the recommendation of the D.P.C., the forum to question such recommendation lies elsewhere but not before the Contempt Court. In the present case, the order of the writ court dated 14/12/2010 has now been complied by the respondents. The case of the applicant was considered and was not found eligible for being promoted. Consequently, notices are discharged and the contempt application is dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 18.08.2011 Shiv