IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 9TH MARCH 2010 / 18TH PHALGUNA 1931 WA.No. 2678 of 2009() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.22093/2009 Dated 05/08/2009 .................... APPELLANT/APPELLANT ----------------------- CHANDRAN NAIR,S/O. KRISHNAPILLA, THEKKUMKATTIL, VALIAKUNNAM, PERUMPATTY VILLAGE, MALLAPALLY TALUK BY ADV. SRI.T.S.JOHN SRI.JESTIN MATHEW RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS --------------------------------------- 1. P.S.MATHAI,MANAPPATT HOUSE, CHALAPALY P.O., MALLAPALLY, PATHANAMTHITTA 2. DISTRICT SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT, COLLECTORATE, PATHANAMTHITTA. 3. TAHASILDHAR, TALUK OFFICE, MALLAPALLY 4. VILLAGE OFFICER,VILLAGE OFFICE, PERUMPATTY. SR. G.P. SMT.K.MEERA FOR R2-4 SRI.K.P.SUJESH KUMAR FOR R1 SMT.G.VANITHA FOR R1 THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/03/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN, AG. C.J. & C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. .................................................................... Writ Appeal No.2678 of 2009 .................................................................... Dated this the 9th day of March, 2010. JUDGMENT Ramahandran Nair, J. Appeal under leave obtained from this court is against judgment of the learned Single judge directing the concerned authority to consider the claim of the first respondent in this Writ Appeal who was the petitioner in the W.P.(C) for effecting mutation of the property claimed by him in his name. During admission the Government Pleader produced written instruction which shows that District Survey Superintendent pursuant to judgment considered the claim of the first respondent herein (writ petitioner) for mutation based on the direction contained in the judgment. However, the same was rejected. In the circumstances, the Writ Appeal has become infructuous and is closed. P.R.RAMAN Acting Chief Justice C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge pms