Civil Revision No.4639 of 2011(O & M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.4639 of 2011(O & M) Date of Decision:26.08.2011 Adarsh Kumar & anr. ....petitioners Versus Kamla Gupta & Ors. .....respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Arun Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr.Chetan Salathia, Advocate for the petitioners Mr.Akshay Bhan, Advocate for the respondents *** RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J.(ORAL): This is tenant's revision petition challenging the impugned orders of the authorities below, whereby his eviction has been ordered on the ground of personal necessity of the respondent-landlords. During the course of arguments, when this Court was not agreeing with the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.Chetan Salathia, Advocate, who is assisting Mr.Arun Jain, Senior Advocate, to represent the case of the petitioner, on instructions from Mr.Adarsh Kumar, petitioner, who is present in the Court, stated that in case, reasonable time is given to the petitioner, he shall hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondents-landlords. Mr.Akshay Bhan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Civil Revision No.4639 of 2011(O & M) 2 the respondents, on instructions from his client Mr.Neeraj Gupta, submits that he has no objection to the prayer made and if the petitioner is granted some reasonable time as considered by this Court, to hand over the vacant possession to the respondent-landlords subject to the condition of his making payment of arrears of rent and further that he shall keep on paying the rent in advance till the date of eviction and also that he shall file an undertaking that he will hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent-landlords on expiry of the time granted by this Court. The aforesaid conditions are acceptable to the petitioner. Keeping in view the stand taken by the learned counsel for the parties, this petition is dismissed with the observations that the petitioner shall hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises on or before 28th February, 2013 to the respondents. It is further mentioned that the petitioner shall also be liable to pay the arrears of rent , if any, within two months from today and he shall keep on making the advance payment of rent on or before the 10th of every month, till the date of eviction. Mr.Arun Jain, learned Senior Advocate has submitted that the undertaking of the petitioner be recorded by this Court. At this stage, statement of the petitioner is recorded separately. The petitioner shall be bound by the aforesaid statement/undertaking made before this Court. In case of any violation of the aforesaid statement/undertaking made before this Court, the eviction order shall come into force, immediately. It is also clarified that in case the petitioner fails to hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises on or before 28th February, 2013, the respondents shall be entitled to initiate the contempt proceedings against the petitioner in addition to the execution of the impugned orders of eviction. The statement/undertaking Civil Revision No.4639 of 2011(O & M) 3 of the petitioner, made before this Court, shall form part of this judgement. Disposed of. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 26.08.2011 neenu