IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1078 of 2011 BHUPENDRA RAI @ BHUPNEDRA RAY, son of late Ram Bachchan Rai, resident of village Sira, PO – Seotar, P.S. Atri, District – Gaya. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Collector, District – Nawada. 3. The District Teacher Appointment Appellate Authority, Nawada, Bihar. 4. The District Superintendent of Education, District – Nawada. 5. The Block Education Extension Officer, Warisganj Block, District – Nawada. 6. The Panchayat Sevak, Gram Panchayat Dosut, P.S. Warisaliganj, District – Nawada. 7. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Dosut, Block Warisaliganj, P.S. Warisaliganj, District – Nawada. 8. The Head Master, Nav Srijit Primary School, Jiyapur, P.S. Warisaliganj, District – Nawada. 9. Smt. Kumkum Kumari, D/O Sri Narendra Prasad Singh, resident of village Dumri, P.O. Sundari Dumri, P.S. Pakaribarawan, District – Nawada. ----------- 02. 27.1.2011 One of the primary contention at the bar on behalf of the petitioner is that the impugned order contained in Annexure-8 dated 18.12.2010 has been passed by the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Nawada without any notice or hearing or right of hearing has been afforded to the petitioner when the fall out of the said decision is on the petitioner. If what has been stated by the petitioner is correct, then it is a serious issue because no authority much less a quasi judicial authority ought to decide a matter detrimental to the interest of a person without hearing or noticing him. Annexure-8 therefore is quashed. Matter is remitted back to the appellate authority with a direction that he will hear the petitioner afresh and pass an appropriate order after hearing. This is however subject to verification of the record on this 2 issue at the level of the appellate authority. The writ application is disposed of with above observation. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)