IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25620 of 2010 1. GOPAL SINGH @ SHANKAR KUMAR SINGH 2. JAGAN SINGH -------------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The matter relates to civil dispute. For the cause of this case, Complaint Case No. 1029 of 2006 was filed against the petitioners in which cognizance was taken and they were allowed bail. Again an F.I.R. was lodged by the complainant/informant Ramchandra Singh, Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No. 476/2006 was registered, matter investigated and final form submitted. After protest cognizance was taken and both the cases amalgamated meant to say that the petitioner no.1 was allowed to remain on bail. On some negotiation, further investigation was ordered, some more evidence collected mainly signatures got compared by Forensic Science Laboratory and forgery was found true. Now submission is that taking into consideration the evidence and allegation of forgery, petitioners have already been allowed bail, may never be taken for refusal of their 2 bail. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in Sasaram (Town) P.S. Case No. 476/06, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)