IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2011 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 34456 of 2011(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.K.AMBIKA, AGED 42 YEARS, W/O.SANTHOSH, PARASSERY HOUSE, PULLUR P.O. KODUNGALLUR NOW WORKING AS HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (HINDI) G.H.S.S. CHERUTHURUTHY, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, O/O. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN - 695001. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THRISSUR PIN 680003. BY G.P. SMT. M.T. SHEEBA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE LIST SHOWING THE PETITIONER'S TRANSFER TO THE 9TH OPTION CHERUTHURUTHY. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITION FOR TRANSFER FOR TE ACADEMIC YER 2011-12. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE RPRESENTATUIB DT.24/10/2010 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS NIL // TRUE COPY // P.S. TO JUDGE T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 34456 of 2011-F - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 21st day of December, 2011. JUDGMENT All that the petitioner seeks for is a direction to the competent among the respondents to consider Ext.P2 application filed by her for transfer for the academic year 2011-2012. It is submitted that the applications for general transfer have been invited. Various details regarding the existence of vacancies have been pointed out by the petitioner in the writ petition and the reasons for seeking such a transfer have also been explained. 2. The application for general transfer submitted by the petitioner will have to be considered along with similar applications of other candidates, before finalysing the list for general transfer this year. It is upto the first respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner in terms of the guidelines for transfer. 3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the first respondent to consider the grievance raised by the petitioner in Ext.P3 before finalysing the list for general transfer this year. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. The petitioner WPC.34456/2011 2 will forward a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the first respondent for compliance. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/