WPMS No.702 of 2011 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. T. P. S. Takuli, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, the learned brief holder for the State. The petitioners’ application for grant of licence to establish a stone crushing unit was rejected by the impugned order on the ground that the application was filed as per the policy of 2001 framed by the State Government, whereas the said policy has been superceded by another policy of 2008. The petitioner, being aggrieved by the said order, has filed the present writ petition. Admittedly, the policy of 2001 has been superceded by the policy of 2008 and, therefore, the court is of the opinion that the petitioners’ application in any case could not have been considered as per the policy of 2001 since the same has now been superceded. In view of the directions dated 16th July, 2010 passed in Writ Petition (P.I.L.) No.799 of 2008, the present petition is disposed of with the direction that the petitioners may apply afresh for grant of a licence as per the existing policy. If such an application is made, the authority concerned will appropriately consider and decide the same within a reasonable period. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 22.11.2011 LSR