... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1173 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1173 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1173 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.362 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.362 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.362 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri Banderkar holding Shri Zia-Ul-Mustafa for the Applicant. Shri D.P.Adsule, A.P.P for the Respondent. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : DECEMBER 12, 2006. DATE : DECEMBER 12, 2006. DATE : DECEMBER 12, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Order of conviction was passed on 16th February, 2006. The Applicant has not surrendered till today. His earlier Application for bail has been dismissed for default. On two occasions this court has noted in the order that the Applicant has not surrendered and he is expected to surrender. 2. The learned A.P.P on instructions of the Investigating Officer states that the Applicant has not surrendered till today. Hence, Application for bail cannot be entertained. Application is rejected. ... 2 ... 3. Liberty to apply after the Applicant surrenders. 4. The officer of the concerned Police Station will take necessary steps on the basis of the impugned Judgment and Order. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE