IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 17912 of 1999 Between: ..... PETITIONER(S) AND .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.J.PRABHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.17912 of 1999 ORDER: The proceedings under challenge in this writ petition is the order of the District Revenue Officer, Mahabubnagar, dated 31.07.1999. In the said proceedings dated 31.07.1999, the District Revenue Officer, Mahabubnagar took note of the fact that the Assistant Collector, Gadwal had issued Occupancy Rights Certificates to the respondents on 08.08.1978, that the land had been mutated in their favour in the R.O.R records and that the change of the entries as claimed by the petitioners did not deserve consideration at that juncture as settled issues would become unsettled. It is not in dispute that on an Occupancy Rights Certificate being granted in their favour, it is only respondents 1 and 2 alone who are entitled to have their names mutated in the R.O.R records. Since the writ petition, filed against the appellate order confirming the grant of Occupancy Rights Certificate in favour of respondents 1 and 2 i.e., W.P.No.14561 of 1999, has been dismissed for default against respondents 3 and 4 therein (i.e, respondents 1 and 2 herein), the relief sought for in the present writ petition cannot also be granted. The writ petition fails and is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs. ______________ 13.08.2008 GS