IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1576 of 2009 RAM KESHAV PRASAD SINGH. SON OF LATE BAIKUNTH BIHARI SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHAK, P.S. MATIHANI, DISTRICT-BEGUSARAI, AT PRESENT PRO SARVODAY NAGAR, NEAR B.P.H.E. SCHOOL, BEGUSARAI. ………………………………PLAINTIFF………….PETITIONER. Versus 1. DISTT. AGRICULTURE OFFICER, BEGUSARSAI, P.S. AND DISTRICT-BEGUSARAI. 2. AGRICULTURE DIRECTOR, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH COLLECTOR, BEGUSARAI. …………………………DEFENDANTS…OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Shiv Nandan Rai, Senior Advocate. ---------- 2. 23.4.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that this Civil Revision would not be maintainable in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Shiv Shakti Coop. Housing Society, Nagpur Vs. Swaraj Developers and others, reported in (2003)6 Supreme Court Cases 659 and Surya Dev Rai Vs. Ram Chander Rai and others reported in (2003)6 Supreme Court Cases 675. However, it is submitted that the proviso to Section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure cannot take away the right of the petitioner from challenging the impugned order by filing a properly constituted writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 2 Thus, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Civil Revision to seek any other remedy which is available to him under law. In that view of the matter, this Civil Revision is dismissed as withdrawn. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)