HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.615 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner herein who is the defendant in the suit-O.S.No.516 of 2008 on the file of the II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur, filed this Civil Revision Petition aggrieved by the order, dated 18.01.2011, passed in I.A.No.893 of 2010 in the said suit, permitting the plaintiff to file four copies of the plaint schedule for the purpose of reconstruction of the record. Learned counsel for the petitioner-defendant contended that the impugned order of the Court below is illegal as it ignored to take note of the fact that the plaint schedule was not filed along with the plaint at the time of filing of the suit and prayed to set aside the impugned order. I have perused the impugned order and the relevant material papers on record. In the impugned order, the Court below recorded that the plaint schedule appended to the plaint might have been misplaced either at the time of numbering the suit or at the time of making over the record to this Court or during the pendency of the suit. For mere latches in the process of handling the bundle of the said suit i.e., at the time of numbering the plaint, during the pendency of the suit, etc., the plaint schedule which was appended to the plaint might have been misplaced. That itself, does not disentitle the plaintiff to ripe the fruits of the decree obtained in the suit and he cannot be directed to file a fresh suit for the very same relief, which is in fact, an abuse of process of law. The defendant who has suffered the decree in the said suit cannot escape from the result of the same under the guise of such negligible mistake. Hence, the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner-defendant that as the plaint schedule was not filed along with the plaint at the time of filing of the suit is not sustainable. The Court below has rightly exercised its inherent power under Section 151 C.P.C. and allowed the said application to meet the ends of justice. In view of the above, the impugned order does not suffer from any illegality, infirmity or irregularity, warranting interference by this Court. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed, at the stage of admission. However, there shall be no order as to costs. _____________________________ JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED​ 25th February 2011 DR