1 S.B.Cr. Misc. Petition No.475/06 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 475/2006 Rupinder Kaur Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others Date of order : 17/04/2009 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr. N.K.Rastogi for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Prajapat, P.P. Mr. Niranjan Singh for the respondents. By the instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the order dated 31.1.2006 passed by Additional Sessions Judge No.1, Sriganganagar (for short 'the revisional court' hereinafter) has been challenged by the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the parties. It appears that on a report lodged by the petitioner for the offences under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC, the police investigated the matter and filed challan against the accused respondents for the offence under Section 406 IPC and did not find offence under Section 498-A IPC. The trial court took the cognizance and subsequently framed charge for the offence under Section 406 IPC and held the trial. According to learned counsel for the respondents, the trial is at the fag end and 2 S.B.Cr. Misc. Petition No.475/06 matter has been finally heard and posted for judgment. Even otherwise, the petitioner has not challenged the order declining to take cognizance or declining to frame charge under Section 498-A IPC and at the fag end of the trial moved for alteration of the charge. In my view, the courts below were justified in passing the order impugned. The order impugned calls for no interference. It cannot be said that the order impugned would result in manifest injustice or abuse of the process of the Court. The criminal misc. petition is therefore, dismissed. Stay petition also stands dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp