IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 879 OF 2000 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 879 OF 2000 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 879 OF 2000 IN IN IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2207 OF 1999 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2207 OF 1999 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2207 OF 1999 AND CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 880 OF 2000 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 880 OF 2000 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 880 OF 2000 IN IN IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2208 OF 1999 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2208 OF 1999 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2208 OF 1999 Ajit Kumar Singh Kasliwal & Ors. ...Applicants V/s. Chimanlal Tikuchandgi Jain & Anr. ...Respondents Shri Ganesh Gole for Applicants. Shri U.V. Nikam, APP for State. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : AUGUST 2, 2006 DATED : AUGUST 2, 2006 DATED : AUGUST 2, 2006 P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- . Both these applications are for modification of the Order passed by Mrs.Justice Baam. In my view, both these applications are not maintainable. By the said order, direction was given to the petitioner to apply for cancellation of warrant in the trial Court and the application was dismissed with the said direction. 2. Thereafter, the matter again appeared before the same Court on 27th June, 2000 and the learned Single - 2 - Judge observed that no further directions were necessary in the matter. Thereafter, the present application is filed for modification. 3. It is apparent that both these petitions were dismissed by the earlier order dated 21st January, 2000 and subsequently, this order was not modified or set aside by the learned Single Judge in her order dated June 27, 2000. 4. In view of the aforesaid order, the applications for modification cannot be entertained and are, therefore, rejected. (V.M. Kanade, J.) (V.M. Kanade, J.) (V.M. Kanade, J.)