IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27931 of 2009 PAPPU YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 07.12.2009 Heard. The petitioner is a co-villager of the informant of a case under sections 395 and 307 of the Penal Code, but still his name does not figure in the F.I.R. Some witnesses have named the petitioner in their statements. The submission is that if the witnesses had identified the petitioner as amongst the dacoits, it was natural that the name of the petitioner ought to have figured in the F.I.R. There is no recovery from the petitioner’s possession. Let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( Rs.Ten thousand ) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Jamui in Jhajha P.S. Case No. 161 of 2008. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J ) BTiwary/