CWP (T) No.2853/2008 21.4.2009: Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Addl. A.G. Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 3. The learned Senior Additional Advocate General has apprised the Court on the basis of instructions imparted to him vide letter dated 18.4.2009 that the petitioner was re-engaged pursuant to the directions issued by the learned Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal on 27.7.1994. In fact, the State has placed on record the copy of order dated 22.6.1994 whereby the petitioner was offered appointment on ad hoc basis. It is not disputed by the learned Senior Additional Advocate General that in the year 1994-95, the State has framed a policy for regularizing the services of College/School Cadre Lecturers. In these circumstances it can be presumed that the petitioner might have been regularized on the basis of these instructions. Accordingly, the petition is rendered infructuous and the same is dismissed having become infructuous. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), April 21, 2009 Judge. *Awasthi*