IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 13513 of 2009 Between: Y. Aymavathi D/o. Y.Venkateswarlu R/o. H.No. 6-2-3591), Ramisetty Vari Sandhu, Bandlamudi Vari Street, Ganganammapet, Tenali, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of A.P., Rep. by its Secretary, Secretarait, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Guntur, Guntur District. 3 The Chairman, Chaitanya Godavari Grameena Baqnk 2/1, Brodipet, 3rd Floor, Raghu Mansion Guntur, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not considering the case of the petitioner/ appellant and not passing orders in the stay petition filed along wiht the Appeal Under Section 7(2) of A.P. ( S.Cs., S.Ts. & B.Cs) Regulation of issue of Community CErtifications Act, 1993 dated 30.06.2009 against the orders of the 2nd respondent vide Rc.No. 216/06-C4 dated 10.06.2009 is arbitrary, unreasonable and consequently grant stay of all further procedings pursuant to the orders of the 2nd respondent vide Rc.No. 216/06-C4, dated 10.06.2009 pending disposal of the appeal before the 1st respondent and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.MURALIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following : Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KSRANI} HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITON No.13513 of 2009 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a Mandamus declaring action of the 1st respondent in not considering the stay petition filed by petitioner along with the Appeal filed under Section 7 (2) of A.P. (S.Cs. S.Ts. & B.Cs.) Regulation of issue of Community Certificates Act, 1993 (for brevity ‘the Act’), dated 30-06-2009, against the orders of the 2nd respondent vide Rc.No.216/06-C4, dated 10-06-2009, as arbitrary and illegal. 2. It appears that petitioner was appointed into the service of the 3rd respondent-Chaitanya Godavari Grameena Bank under the social status certificate of ‘S.T.’ Now petitioner is working as a Manager of Grameena Bank. While that being so, some one made a complaint stating that petitioner obtained employment by deceitful method by producing a false caste certificate showing as S.T. Subsequently, the matter was enquired by the District Level Scrutiny Committee and the said Committee had submitted a report to the District Collector stating that the petitioner had obtained a false certificate showing that she belongs to ‘Konda Kapu’ community, which is enumerated in the S.T. category. The District Collector accepted the same and cancelled caste certificate issued in favour of the petitioner. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner filed an appeal before the Government under Section 7 (2) of the Act and the same is pending. Along with the appeal, the petitioner also preferred a stay petition that is not being disposed of till date. Meanwhile, on 06-07-2009, the third respondent gave a notice to the petitioner for termination. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed. 3. Under those circumstances, without expressing any opinion on merits, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that no further action shall be taken by the respondents against the petitioner, in pursuance to the orders passed by the 2nd respondent, dated 10-06-2009, during the pendency of the appeal before the 1st respondent. No costs. _________________ 8th July 2009 kvr