c^t?V// IN THE HIQH COUBT OF JUDICATUREAT BIIA8FUR WHt Petttion No.5&^^/2003 / PETmONER i Smt. Asha Lata Jhajja, ..Aged aboujt years, ^ ,^ ^es" ^ s®* .9 .*•*'" •''•Sr-t*' u«? '^.- «•^°AWc'^*<i;^ , R/o Dalp&t S^ar Ward, ,**'' I ' ~ • ' Near Anupama Talldea, Jagdalpur paster) (C.G.) RESPONDENT8 Versus 1. State ofChhftttisgarh, Ttarough Secretary, Law and Legislatiwe AfiEancs Department, Uantealaya, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.)t The Depuly Srifctetaiy, Law aud Legialatnre AfGaira Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, KflgnM-jC.G.) 3. The Diatrict & SesMoas Judge, Baster, J^dalpur. WSIT paaraTon UBDBR ARMCIA aac/aar <» THB coiiBnTcnon w XSOIA fast lasoASCK OB' A SBITAaUB WRIT. ORDBR OR DIRBCTlOB TO DO JXTBTICB CT THB MAnraiR. 8 C si^V mr ft-ti* wiS? 3~^ •Ol^iy'M,; t?Tll*t-i|'S,i'fa(;ll«^<;^ ...^..........^^^M^.j ^ sn^i^TOS? (^^?^*t) gwiwBftaai^i 27.3.,2005 On li mention being miKie. p+secas^jstakenypfoi'.hairing. Shrilndra Sen Saiiu, Cour|sel for the petitioner Shr-i Pramod Kymar Vernla, Addi-tional Advocate 6eneral- for the STate/respondents. l-1eard both the counsel. The petitionet' has prefer^ed 1+iiswrit petition under Artide 226/ 227 of the Constitution ef Ind |a, questianing the iegaiit^ pr-opriety and renewai of the said certificdN and proyiSionS'af Sub-Section 1952. Whereas, ftie said prov) ^tptJ<?)<lll 4fsMf ^ TS£^<Fal^$R^ ^f SlfilB 3t il ^ ^~:V 31.0®.2003(AnnexyreP-14) passedby eorrectness of tto or'dep ?lei*ect resDondent No.3. •; Brief facts leading to filir^g <?f •Hiis petitionwe "rtintthe pe.titioner is practicing as Nofei-y in &is*r'i<it: Jagc^lpur' (Bda&ir). As her.fenure of the cer'tificate to practice d^ notary wois expiring(1+ierefope, the petitioner meiy^ :on opi^coM^]R^befoT'& -fhe responcient/State for Bnd vide order aated 31.12.Z003 her certificate was renswed for a j^eriod of -riirse years os psr 1+is old kiw [2) of $ection 5 of -the Notaries Act, ision STOOG amended lav the Aet 36 of 1999, wher^faY the pei'iod of ^hpee year's was amendecl to five years WA.f. 17.12.1999. , I have perused sub-Secti^in (2) OT Section 5 of the Notaries Act, ISS'Swhich.rendstbyS"."... IBRPRJ—FS/350—12/2000—50WO. ±' XI-HC—78 '3^ •<ii^i(*i-4,;yxil*)*!is,'fi(CTi'yi< ^' '^^•^•"•^ *<i*ini^»tflcf> a;ii^f^'CRER(l^i^'i8'^ sn^i ^i R-ii+' '?f2H ^IT^T ^+itqi ^, Soma l!"i if1': '--^, 'lhe giovernment app< receipt of an qspiica^on renew the eertjficate it a period of five years c|t TTierefore, in yiew of thi certificate to practice as Notary period of five years. In the 'circumstances. the aflowed. Accordingly, -rhe petition directed ta renew theipetitionsr's for a period pf fi'/e years instedd origina! date from which she wasen' In yiew of •Hiis order, No.10415/2003 stand disposed of. Part'ies aFeentitled for 7^i^i<^*f1l ^Wdl' ^f fe<d1 <Hi!li^.K ^? sifgK sn^. : ' -: inting tiie notary,_may, on / '-—^ cend the preschibed fee, if practice pf any notary for a time." above provisions the petiticiner's ought to have been renewed for a |?eTifibners petition deserveS to;be js ailowed and ttae re^jondents are certificate for procticing as Notary ^>f three yedrs wi-tfi effect from the h'Tled TQt' renewai of thscartificdTe. M.(W-5P-No.3280/2Q03 and I.A. certiljjed copy of this op LC.Bhados ^ Jiidge c—s