AB 4012/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN Heard Mr. HRA Choudhury, learned Sr. counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B.S. Sinha, learned Addl. P.P, Assam, who has produced the case diary. Mr. Choudhury, learned counsel submits that because of the proceeding in itiated by him against the family of the informant under Section 107 IPC, out of grudge he has been implicated in the Ejahar. According to Mr. Choudhury, the pe titioner Burzut Ali Mallik on the date of occurrence that is 8-11-2011 and 9-11- 2011 was on duty at Dhaligaon in district of Bongaigaon. From the case diary it is seen that there are references to one Burzut Ali and in the investigation it is being ascertained as to whether Burzut Ali is the same person as Burzut Ali M allik, the petitioner in this petition. Considering the fact that the petitioner is in service in the Assam Police, I am of the view that there is no scope for the petitioner to abscond. As such, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered tha t in the event of arrest of the petitioner, Burzut Ali Mallik in connection with Barpeta P.S. Case No. 1289 of 2011 registered under Section 147/447/294/326/ 37 9/302 IPC, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000/ - with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting author ity, subject to the following conditions: (1) that he will appear before the I.O within 7(seven) days from today; (2) that he will cooperate with the investigation of the case; and (3) that he will also refrain himself from influencing the witnesses in any man ner. Bail application stands disposed of.