Ladda 1 appln-141-11.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 141 OF 2011. Mrs Debbi A. Rodrigues & others ...Applicants. Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors ...Respondents ...... Mr Ashok Mundargi, Senior Counsel i/by Abhayankar & Co. for the applicants. Mr Y. M. Nakhwa, A.P.P.for the State. Mr Mukesh B. Bhagat, Advocate for Respondent No.3. CORAM: A.R.JOSHI, J. DATED:- 21st March 2011. P.C. In this matter, both the present Applicants who are officials of State Bank of India, N.R.I. Branch, Nariman Point, Mumbai have applied for quashing the C.R.No. 2 of 2010 registered against them by Cyber Police Station, C.B.C.I.D., Mumbai on the complaint lodged by present Respondent No.3 dated 8th January, 2010. Offences are punishable under Sections 409, 419, 420, 465,467, 468 read with Section 34 of Ladda 2 appln-141-11.doc Indian Penal Code and Sections 66 (C) and 66 (D) of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Today, rival contesting parties are present in the Court and reiterated that they have compounded the offence and reiterated the contents of the consent terms dated 18th March, 2011, which are filed today in the Court and affidavit, sworn by original Complainant – Respondent No.3 of the same date, is also produced before the Court, specifically mentioning in paragraph No.9 therein that she had already received her amount from the concerned Bank and the said amount has also been realized in her account and she has no grievance of whatsoever nature against the said bank officials (present Applicants). 2. In that view of the matter, application is allowed. The concerned C.R.No.2 of 2010, which is still under investigation, is quashed and set aside. Consent terms are taken on record and marked as Exhibits ‘A -1’ and ‘A-2’ for the purpose of identification. 3. Criminal Application No. 141 of 2011 is disposed of in terms of this order. (A.R.JOSHI, J.)