IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 27TH JANUARY 2009 / 7TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 2654 of 2009(N) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- 1. P.V.VALSARAJ,S/O.GOVINDAN NAMBIAR, RESIDING AT SREEVALSAM,THODIKALAM,KANNAVAM, KANNUR DIST. 2. P.V.JANAKI AMMA, W/O.GOVINDAN NAMBIAR, RESIDING AT SREEVALSAM, THODIKALAM, KANNAVAM, KANNUR DIST. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.SREEJITH RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. VILLAGE OFFICER, KANNAVAM VILLAGE, KANNAVAM, KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, THALASSERY TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT. 3. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THALASSERY, KANNUR DIST. 4. PRIYA JAYARAJ, W/O.JAYARAJ, RESIDING AT KARAPARAMBATH VEEDU, KANNAVAM AMSOM, THODIKALAM DESOM. GOVT.PLEADER SMT.SUDHA DEVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 2654 OF 2009 (N) ==================== Dated this the 27th day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T The prayer in this writ petition is to direct consideration of Ext.P2, where the petitioner alleges that the 4th respondent is converting certain properties violating the Kerala Land Utilisation Order. 2. A reading of Ext.P3 report of the Village Officer indicates that there are litigations between the petitioners and the 4th respondent. From this, it is obvious that the very complaint of the petitioners is ill-motivated. If that be so, this Court will not be justified in rendering assistance to the petitioners. Writ petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp