IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 19TH MARCH 2010 / 28TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 8298 of 2010(J) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MICROQUAL TECHNO PVT LTD HAVING REGD. OFFICE AT 306,LAXMI INDUSTRIAL ESTATE,NEWLINK RD., ANDHERI(W),MUMBAI-400053,REP.BY ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE MR.SHAJI.B.,AGED 36 YEARS,R/AT. MADHAVAM (THYKKATTU),KALLARA ROAD,NEAR MAHILA SAMAJAM, EROOR POST,THRIPPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.KRISHNA PRASAD. S RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. VADAKKEKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY,VADAKKEKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, VADAKKEKKARA P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GP K.R.DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ------------------- W.P.(C).8298/2010 -------------------- Dated this the 19th day of March, 2010 JUDGMENT Petitioner challenges the order passed by the 1st respondent Panchayat cancelling Ext.P2 building permit. A reading of Ext.P2 building permit shows that the said building permit has been issued in favour of one Biju T. Nair. However, petitioner claims that being a contractor to install the tower mentioned in Ext.P1, they have filed this writ petition. 2. In my view, if at all anybody is aggrieved by the cancellation of Ext.P2, it is only the person in whose favour the said building permit has been issued and as far as the petitioner is concerned they are stranger to the building permit. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of locus standi of the petitioner to challenge the cancellation of Ext.P2. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs