IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 5451 of 2008. Decided on: August 16, 2010. J.K. Mohindru . …..Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & ors. ….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the petitioner: Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K.Sharma, Sr. Addl. AG. for respondents No. 1 to 3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The Writ Petition is filed with the following prayers: “ (a) That in view of the facts and circumstances stated hereinabove, it is most respectfully prayed that the respondents may be directed to repatriate Respondents No. 4 to 9 to the P.W.D. Department and Respondent Department may be directed to convene D.P.C. and to consider the applicant for the post of Assistant Engineer w.e.f. 3.10.1997 and promote him as such with all consequential benefits. (b) That the Respondent Department may be directed to consider the applicant in the present D.P.C. for the post of Assistant Engineer forthwith and promote him with all consequential benefits.” 2. In view of the stand taken in the reply-affidavit that the petitioner had already been considered by the D.P.C. in the year 1997 and in view of the intervening developments, in case the petitioner has still any grievance left, he may approach the first respondent, in which case, the 2 first respondent will consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with law, with notice to the petitioner and any other affected party and appropriate action in the matter will be taken within another four months. 3. With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. August 16, 2010. ( Justice Kuldip Singh) (karan/vs) Judge.