IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 27TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 7051 of 2006(M) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- S.ANIL KUMAR, LECTURER (SENIOR SCALE) DEPARTMENT OF BOTONY, SREE NARAYANA COLLEGE, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.D.KISHORE RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, SOUTH ZONE, KOLLAM. 3. THE PRINCIPAL, SREE NARAYANA COLLEGE, KOLLAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. MANU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.7051/2006 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE G.O.(P) NO.480/89/FIN DT. 1.11.1989. P2:- COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. P3:- COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS NO.B5/3445/03-04 DTD. 25.3.2004 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT. P4:- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 6.7.05 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONR BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P5:- COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS NO.B5/8327/05 DTD. 2.8.05 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT. P6:- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 14.10.05 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITINER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL:- TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J. ------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.7051 Of 2006 M ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 16th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2011 J U D G M E N T The claim of the petitioner is for medical reimbursement under the Kerala Government Servant's Medical Reimbursement Rules, 1960. 2. The petitioner's mother was treated in the Medical College Hospital, Thiruvananthapuram and the last date of treatment was 26.1.2004. Exhibit P2 is the application submitted by the petitioner claiming medical reimbursement. Exhibit P3 is the communication from the Principal to the Deputy Director of Collegiate Education, stating that the same has been forwarded for appropriate action. 3. If the claim has not been assessed and the due amount has not been disbursed so far, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the application produced as Exhibit P2 and disburse the eligible benefits to the petitioner within a period of three months. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Sd/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn