IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.13444 OF 2010 ALI AKHTAR @ AKHTAR ALAM @ ALI AKHTAR, SON OF LATE NAEM ALAM, RESIDENT OF VILALGE PRANPUR, POLICE STATION BARHARIA, DISTRICT SIWAN VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR ********* 4 12/10/2010 Heard Counsel for the petitioner and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case under Section 406 & 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the case is a concocted one as it is alleged that the complainant had gone to his house and allegedly met his father, who disclosed that he is not concerned with the case. It is submitted that the father of the petitioner, namely, Nayeem Alam, had died in the year 2006 itself and, therefore, the story put up by the complainant is false. Learned A.P.P., on the other hand, submits that there are materials and witnesses in the case diary who support the payment of the money. Be that as it may, the petitioner may have a good ground for grant of regular bail. However, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the above named petitioner. This application is accordingly dismissed. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )