(1) CRI APPLN. 4280.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4280 OF 2010 Yogesh S/o Balkrishna Joshi APPLICANT VERSUS Sow Bharati W/o Yogesh Joshi and ors. RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. G.N. Kulkarni, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. G.R. Ingole, A.P.P. for the Respondent-State. ..... CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J. DATED : 7TH OCTOBER, 2011 ORAL ORDER: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Grant of maintenance under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to the minor daughter of the present applicant i.e. the original applicant no.2-Khushi @ ` 1500/- per month from the date of filing of the application under section 125 Cr.P.C. is challenged. The learned Sessions Judge has confirmed the order of the learned J.M.F.C. 3. Both the orders show that the orders are passed on the basis of the averment of present applicant that he was a partner in a Bidi factory. It is the case of the applicant that he is a hawker. (2) CRI APPLN. 4280.2010 4. Taking into consideration the fact that the applicant is an able bodied person and is a hawker, as well as he was a partner in a Bidi factory, the order of both the Courts below, cannot be called as perverse or not based on any evidence. 5. In the circumstances, the Criminal Application is dismissed. Sd/- [M. T. JOSHI, J.] arp/