IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.2790 OF 2008 State Bank of India ...Plaintiff Vs. Prakash Laxman Jagtap ...Defendant --- Mr.Prasad Das i/b.Goenka Law Associates for Plaintiff None for Defendant ---- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED 31ST JULY, 2009 P.C. 1. This is a Summary Suit filed by the Plaintiff. 2. None appears on behalf of the Defendant, though he has served. 3. The Plaintiff has filed the affidavit of summons. No appearance is filed within 10 days though the writ of summons was served on the Defendant. 4. The Plaintiff is, under these circumstances, entitled for judgment and decree in view of the provisions under Order XXXVII Rule 2. The Plaintiff had given a loan of Rs.2 lacs in favour of the Defendant. The Defendant has signed and accepted the said loan which was sanctioned in his favour. Though loan become due and payable, the said amount was not paid and as a result, the Summary Suit on the basis of a written contract executed by the Defendant with the Plaintiff therein. Suit, therefore, is decreed in terms of prayer clause 16(a). V.M. KANADE J.