FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5959 OF 2011 "Udhav s/o. Nagorao Telange Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. S.G. Magre, Advocate holding for Mr. M.D. Godhamgaonkar, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. P.P. More, AGP for respondents. CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATE :- 8th NOVEMBER, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] The learned Tribunal has given sound and cogent reasons while rejecting the original application. It has been found that the petitioner was given fresh appointment on compassionate ground. It has been further found by the Tribunal that the petitioner has not produced any Rules, which would enable treatment of his break between the initial dismissal and the fresh appointment as continuous service. Even as on today, no such Rules are produced before this court so as to warrant interference. In that view of the matter, writ petition is dismissed. [M.T. JOSHI,J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/-