z Karan Singh Thakur, Agai / S/o. ?0St Gujarat Beiscnéha, S'mgh, Tan Rio. 6n Distt Viiiage Mahasamun& Mudhena) about 51 yam, {CG} aEsWiiwii-Ts -. Narentira Singh S / o. Bramha Singh, viliage years, Rio. Aged about 45 Govinda, Tahsil Arang, Post Paragaon, Dist'Iict Raipur {CG} COI‘S‘TIT§Ti$ii OF i§3§m 227 OF THE WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 VERSUS af Ch‘nattisgarh, / State Through: Sammy, Minerai Resources Bhawam W W23} Septg D‘KS. Raipux {Gag 2} Coli‘ector, {Mining}. Mahasammd, Mahasamunu‘ (CG) ’V Disu‘ict 3} Director, Geology 3s Mg, Distt Raipur (CG) ‘“ Raipur, Chhatu'sgarh, HIGH CGURT (BF CHHATTES§ARH AT BHASPUR $3. : HGN’BLE SEEK SATISH K, AGNEHQTRE, VACATEQN JUQGE WRIT PETETIQN N@.2695 Q}? 2806 Petiticmey Karan Singh Thakur State sf Chhattisgarh and others Respondents Present : Mr. VA. Goverdhan, ceunsel for the petitioner, Mr. Yashwant Singh Thakur, Government Advocate for respandents N0. 1, 2 and 3. @RAL @RDER (Fassed on 5m Juno, 2006) r . In tho prewm petition, mo petitiomr has impugned the ordm‘ dated 9u5=2006 passed by Under Secretary to the Government of Chhattisgarh, Mineral Resources Department, hoiding that prima facte- it appeared that the petitioner has not obtaitted consent of ail the land owoers of Khasra No.6 mid 9. The revisional authority has remanded back the matter to the Coileetor, Mahasamund to consider case of the petitioner ae‘esh with regard to grant 0f lease in dispute. ThiS Court in exereise of its writ jurisdiction under Artiste 227 of the Constitution catmet g0 into the oediog of facts at; to Whether the petitioner has obtained consent of all the i t l land holders 0f Khasra N06 and 9. The Caliector, MahaSamund has accer{iixigiy bees} directed to censidm‘ case of tm petitionm‘ afresh. 2. NO case hug been made Gui far interfeyance by this Court. Eowever, having rsgard to tha facts a11d circumStances of the case, Collector, Mahasamund is directed to’ consider ease of the petitianer after providing sufficient oppofmnity of hearing to ail the parties, within a period of six weeks from today and pass appropriate order. In the iriearitime, the land in dispute bearing Khasra No.6 and 9 be not allotted/’aiienated to any other person. 3. For the reasons Statedhabove, this petition stands disposed of. In View ofthe above, M.(W.)P.No.203$/2006, an application for grant of ad» interim relief stands disposed of, l.A.No.532l/’2006, an application for hearing the matter during summer vacation stands allowed and l.A.No.5320/2006, an application for urgent hearing stands disposed of. No order as to costs. a r A‘rr. Certified copy as per rules. i Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri Vacation Judge