^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Sinale Bench : Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh. J. Appellant Non-Applicant Resoondents M.A.fCLNo.953/2007 Chhattar Singh, S/o Hamkar singh, Aged about 43 years, Caste Gond, R/o Risali Sector, Qtr. No.195/F Risati, Post Nawai, District Durg, C.G. (Owner & Driver of the offending Vehicte) Versus 1. Rajneesh Kumar S/o Late Yogesh Kumar, Aged about 22 years, Caste Christian, R/o Selud Post Utai, Tehsil and District Durg, (C.G.) (Claimant) 2. Bajaj Allianze General (nsurance Company Limited, Through its Dlvisional, Manager, First Floor. Shlv Mohan Bhawan, Vidhan Shabha Road, Pandri Raipur Tehsil and District Raipur (C.G.) . (Insurer of the offending Vehicle) APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACT. 1988 Present: Shri Avinash Chand Sahu, counsel for the appellant. Shri Sachin Singh Rajput, counsel for respondent No.2 ORAL ORDER (Passed on 05.08.2008) !K The appellant is aggrieved by the order dated 30.03.2007 passed in daims case No.16/2007 by the 5th Additional Motor Acddents Claims Tribunal, Durg (henceforth 'the Tribunal') whereby a sum of Rs.23,600/- as compensation has been awarded. While awarding compensation, the Tribunal had directed the insurance company to first pay the compensation and thereafter to recover the same from the owner.11^- >^ttw~^~4/^. 7° V,^ Vs^^, e^U^J^dL -RA^- e^X^- <-^—^<^^-^t^<^O^^-^^^^ ^^ H^t- l-»^<0^^^^<. 2. Learned counsel for the parties submitted that an amicabfe setttement has been arrived at whereunder the insurance company has agreed to recover only that amount which the appellant/owner has deposited in the Tribunal as statutory deposit. It has further been agreed between the parties \A^V<-^U^-- .^ ^. z^ that the respondent No.2 / insurance company shall not recover from the appellanVowner the remainder amount. 3. Learned counsel for the parties prayed that in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, the appeal be disposed of. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- D'UpRaosahebDeshmuki, ?e ^(^J