1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APPLICATION NO.1318 OF 2007 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.1022 OF 1997 M/s.Associated Investment & Trading Company. ..Applicant V/s. Wanbury Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.N.R.Mody i/b. Rustomji & Ginwala for applicant. Ms.Musharaf i/b. D.H.Law Associates for respondent. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : DECEMBER 14, 2007. DATE : DECEMBER 14, 2007. DATE : DECEMBER 14, 2007. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Counsel for the Respondent submits that she would like to take instruction and to file reply to oppose the application. I find no reason to accede to the request. This is so because, the relief claimed in this application is founded on the communication sent by the Respondent company to the Petitioner dated July 18, 2007 Exh."A". The amendment sought by the Petitioner/applicant is formal in nature, in view of the subsequent development. Accordingly, Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Disposed off accordingly. 2. Amendment to be carried out within one week. 2 (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J)