1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.258 OF 2009 IN S.C.SUIT NO.3049 OF 2008 WITH C.A.NO.305 OF 2009 Mr.Shashikant A. Mali and ors. ..Appellants. Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. Mr.Anil Singh i/by Mr. H.M.Pandey for the Appellants. Mr.A.R.Patil for the Respondent. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 28th July,2009 PC : 1. Heard both sides. 2. There is some dispute as to whether possession has been taken under the Urban Land Ceiling Act. On behalf of the State of Maharashtra reliance is placed on the possession panchanama but admittedly, the same does not mention any survey number of the property. Reliance is also placed on 2 several other documents. In any case, it is case of the State Government that the possession has already been taken then they should not aggrieved by any order restraining them from taking possession because they cannot take the possession for second time. In the circumstances, both the parties agree that in respect of the suit property status quo should be maintained. On behalf of the State Govt. certain documents are produced. These documents may be produced before the trial court pending disposal of the suit. Parties to maintain status quo as of today. A.O. is disposed off. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.305 OF 2009 1. As the A.O. is disposed off, Civil application does not survive and the same is also disposed off. ( R.S.MOHITE, J.)