CRM-M-28152 of 2011 - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M-28152 of 2011 Date of Decision:19.10.2011 Ravi . . .Petitioner Versus State of Haryana . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Manoj Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Sagar Deswal, AAG, Haryana. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This is a petition for bail pending trial in a case registered vide FIR No.397 dated 29.07.2011 under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’) at Police Station Ambala Cantt. District Ambala. The allegation against the petitioner is that he had extracted `2000/- from deceased Ankur and also threatened him to part with `4000/- more otherwise he would involve him in some case. It is alleged that he became disturbed and took his life on 29.7.2011. Learned counsel for the State has pointed out that Ankur was having an affair with a girl namely, Soni, who was studying in Senior Secondary School at Ram Bagh Road, Ambala Cantt. to whom the deceased had provided a mobile phone so that could communicate with her. That girl was caught by her teacher while talking on mobile phone and was asked to bring some family member. It is alleged that present petitioner met the school teacher as her brother on the asking of deceased Ankur, on a payment of `2000/-, so that the matter could be settled but later on the petitioner demanded another sum of `4000/- as a result of which Ankur allegedly committed suicide. CRM-M-28152 of 2011 - 2 - Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has been falsely implicated in this case because the deceased did not leave any suicide note. He further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 31.7.2011 and he is neither a previous convict nor any other case is pending against him. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case but without making any observation on the merits, the present petition is allowed. Petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) OCTOBER 19, 2011 JUDGE Vivek