1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2355 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – VI, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus M/s.Aftek Infosys Limited ..Respondent. Mr.A.K. Jasani for the respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2356 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 6, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus M/s.Bramhadev Holding & Trading Ltd., Mumbai ..Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2357 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 6, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus M/s.Berila Chemicals & Traders Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai ..Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2358 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 6, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus M/s.Avarsekar & Sons Private Limited ..Respondent. Mr.Dhananjay Athavale for the appellant. None for the respondent in ITXA (L) No.2356, 2357 & 2358/08. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 2nd July, 2009 P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the revenue. There is delay in filing all these appeals. Mr.Dhananjay Athavale, learned counsel states that no 2 notices of motion for condoning the delay caused in filing these appeals have been taken out by the revenue. Since there are no notices of motion for condonation of delay, the appeals are liable to be dismissed as barred by limitation. 2. At this juncture, it is relevant to mention here that though there is a prayer for condonation of delay in all these appeals, however no material facts and/or particulars are disclosed in the appeal memo much less a statement on oath giving explanation is filed on record. 3. In this view of the matter, for want of Notices of motion as well as sufficient and reasonable cause for condoning the delay, all the appeals are dismissed being barred by limitation with no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)