IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETIT10N(S) Noiwgk /201 1. {Sushil Kumar Sinha, son of Late Shri Suresh Prasad Sinha, aged about 47 years, Presently working as Sub Engineer P.H.E. Sub Division Ambikapur, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. PETITIONER: VCI‘SUS y)! r 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, P.H.E. Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. at 2. Eng‘neer in Chief P.H.E. Department, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. (f i ‘K 3. *Onkar Singh, In Charge Asst. Eng'neer , Sub Division Ramanujganj, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. Respondents WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA “14‘ f mm w%@)w'?i’ggJ¥ 200 811wW (Wu) mmm mm @m awf‘cmemévr SB‘: HoWble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J \ 12-1 2-2911 Shri C.J.K.Rao; counsei for the petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Deputy Advocate Generai for the Staie. ' Learnedcounsei for :he petit ‘oner submits that the respondents have issued é 60mmon gfedetion iist of an the e igineers. He submits that the issue with regard to vaiidity of common gradation iist was considered in W.P.No.3277/04 and batch of writjpetitions which was decidec on 18i06i07 in which, direction was issued to prepare two gradation iists and to consider for promotions in the category of degree hoiders and dipioma hoideirs. Learned counsei for the petitioner further submitted that the aforesaid order s chaiienged by fliing writ appeai in which, an interim order was passed staying t e effect and operation of order dated i8i06i37. He submits that whiie the matter as remained sub judice, now, the respondents have issued a common gradation ii twhich is not proper. As the matter is pending consideration before the Division Bench in the writ appeai on the same issue which 1as been decided vide order dated 18i06i07 in W.P.No.3277/04 and batch of petitions, i am not inciined to entertain this petition. The petition is therefore dismissec. The gradation iist cannot be said to be iiiegai ,in view of the interim order which: has been passed by the Division Bench in the writ appeai. The petitioner wouid be at iiberty to take recourse to remedy as may be avaiiabie to him under the Iaw. i i i i Sdl- i f ‘Manindra Mohan Shrivastava peepii § ‘ Judge ama‘hn wish: awraa, zmqiariir'swi so 4i)«»-2/20i lwi $0,000.