IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 6732 of 1985 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH Sd/- ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO 1 to 5 - No -------------------------------------------------------------- NAROTTAMBHAI RAMJI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR PV HATHI for Petitioners MR VM PANCHOLI, AGP for Respondent No. 1 NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 2, 3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH Date of decision: 09/07/1999 ORAL JUDGEMENT This petition is filed by six residents of Mangrol town in Junagadh District owning different immoveable properties for themselves and also on behalf of all other property owners in Mangrol town. The grievance of the petitioners is that the City Survey Superintendent does not carry out the city survey work in accordance with the provisions of the Bombay Land Revenue Code and the Rules framed thereunder, but the City Survey Superintendent prepares more than one sanad for one property and compels the parties to pay different sanad fees. 2. Looking to the subject matter of the petition and considering the fact that the City Survey Superintendent is under the administrative control of the Collector, Junagadh, it would be just and proper to dispose of this petition with a direction that respondent No. 2-Collector, Junagadh shall consider the memo of this petition as a representation and after giving the authorized representative of the petitioners an opportunity of being heard, take decision in the matter within three months from the date of receipt of the writ of this Court or a certified copy of this judgment, whichever is earlier. 3. The petition stands disposed of in terms of the aforesaid direction. Sd/- July 9, 1999 (M.S. Shah, J.) sundar/-