S. B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.170/2010 SURESH KUMAR SEN V. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN. DATE OF ORDER ::: 21/07/2010 HON'BLE MR. C.M.TOTLA, J. Mr. Farzand Ali, for Petitioner (s). Mrs. Chandra Lekha, PP, for the State. Learned Public Prosecutor accepts notice. This revision petition challenging order of the learned Special Judge, NDPS Cases, Chittorgarh, requests that setting aside the impugned order, also be directed that the vehicle van RJ1-U-0672 be given to petitioner pending trial on supurdginama/surety of the appropriate amount. Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that even per prosecution, at the time of said search and recovery, the revisionist was not in the vehicle – vehicle was taken away by other for their domestic purpose – lying unused for about a year and no other claimant. Further argued that vehicle not needed in course of trial and if need, shall be presented by him who shall abide by every condition imposed and/or to by the order to be passed. Also argued that no else claims the vehicle. In support of his contention, relied on 2009 (2) Cr.L.R. Raj. 1458. Considering arguments, had a careful look at the order. True, the vehicle is lying for about ten months, but the registration indisputably is not in the name of the revisionist. Described is the person in the order in favour of whom registration of vehicle is. Challan against revisionist, per argument, also is read with S.25 of the Act. In view of the above, no interference is warranted in order impugned. The revision is rejected. The order not to affect proceedings or any other application. (C. M. TOTLA), J. scd