IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** Crl. Misc. No. M-15107 of 2009 Date of Decision:04.04.2011 Vikrant Sharma and others .....Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- None for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, AAG, Punjab. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.(Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C for issuance of direction to respondents to serve an advance notice of five days in case any FIR is registered against the petitioners and also for direction to investigate the matter from some independent agency. Notice of motion was issued on 28.5.2009 and in response thereto, reply on behalf of State has already been filed, which is on record. Learned State Counsel, on the basis of reply, submits that the present petition has become infructuous as two FIRs i.e., FIR No.21 dated 22.1.2009 under Sections 406/498-A/317 IPC at Police Station Civil Line Amritsar and FIR No.75 dated 27.4.2009 under Sections 420/509/197/182 and 120-B IPC read with Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Woman (Prohibition) Act, 1986 Police Station `C' Division, Amritsar had already been registered against the accused – petitioners and sister-in-law(Nanad) and her husband(Nandoi) and accused have been arrested and they have also Crl. Misc. No. M-15107 of 2009 -2- joined investigation. Learned State Counsel further submits that challan has also been presented and now on request made by the petitioners, re- investigation cannot be accepted at this stage. The prayer in the petition is only for giving advance notice prior to registration of any case against the petitioners and since two FIRs have already been registered against them and they have already joined the investigation, no interference is required at this stage and the present petition has become infructuous. Dismissed as having rendered infructuous. April 04, 2011 ( DAYA CHAUDHARY ) renu JUDGE