COCP No.1604 of 2011 (O & M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1604 of 2011 (O & M) Date of decision: 04.10.2011 Kewal Chand Verma .... Petitioner Versus Shri K.D. Choudhary and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr.A.K. Walia, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Paramjit Batta, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.: (Oral) The grievance of the petitioner is non-compliance of order dated 23.02.2011 passed by this Court in CWP No.398 of 2010 whereby a direction had been issued to the respondents to release retiral dues of the petitioner along with interest at the rate of 7% per annum within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 2. Upon notice, reply has been filed on behalf of respondent No.4 wherein it has been stated that the payment of arrears has been released to the petitioner. Para 1 thereof reads as under :- “That the above-mentioned case is fixed for COCP No.1604 of 2011 (O & M) ::2:: 04.10.2011 and the above mentioned C.O.C.P has arisen from the order of this Hon'ble Court passed in C.W.P. No.398 of 2010, Kewal Chand Verma Versus P.S.E.B. And others dated 23.02.2011 (Annexure P-1). At the very outset it is stated that the due legal permissible benefits of the petitioner already stands released in so far as which are to be paid by the office of answering respondent. The following payments have been made to the petitioner, the details alongwith the endorsement no. and their dates is given as under:- Sr. No. Memo/ Endst. No. Date The head under which payment made Amount in Rs. 1 658/59 09/09/11 Arrears of pay for the period of 17.05.1991 to 14.10.1991 7,428/- 2 1205 19.09.11 Arrears of pay for the period of 19.08.1993 to 06.05.1997 11,411/- 3 1443 26.09.11 Arrears of pay for the period of 29.05.1997 to 18.08.2006 10,27,735/ - 4 1862/PF T-390 26.09.11 Arrears of pay for the period of 19.08.2006 to 10.04.2007 1,24,329/- The respondent Company has been released the arrears on account of revised pay. It is apparent that the directions issued by the Hon'ble Court on 23.02.2011 have been complied with, as the said payments are on account of the period during which the petitioner had worked with COCP No.1604 of 2011 (O & M) ::3:: Protection & Maintenance Division, PSTCL, Ludhiana under the office of the deponent. ” 3. In view of the above, no further action is called for in this petition and the same is disposed of as such. 4. However, it shall be open to the petitioner to take recourse to the legal remedies, in case any grievance subsists, in accordance with law. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE October 04, 2011 sukhpreet