N THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHA é23@ Suhru Ram Jaiswal, S/o Shri Hathar Jaiswal, ged aut— 50 years, Ro. Village— Masaliia, Post— Masan, Tahsil— kti, District— Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). / : 1. Sate of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary 85 Ministr Puic Work Department, D.K’S. Bhawa, Raipur (C.G.). Chief Engineer, Pli Wk Dpartment, Bilpur (.) Superintenent Engine Public Work Department, Bilaspur (C.G.). Executive Engineer, Pubc Wor Department ation Highway Division, laspur (C.G.). b Divisional Officer, Pulic Work Department, National Highay, Sub Divisio igarh (C.G.). Sub Divisional Officer, P.W.D. Kharsia, Sub Division, District— Raigarh (C.G.). / VVRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE a CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. I TTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION No. / 2005 PETITIONER v k A bo ia Sa / VERSUS / t RESPONDENTS y bl h ubc or e as C.G. d er, li k Nal Bi v Su b w n Ra XI-HCAZQ '31! fWm 13 1" 7005' Shn P Ix PateL Counsel for me p tmoner Sim VlVeL Shanna Panel Lawwm for the Stat H¢ard e i Counsel for the petitioner subml that the matter relates to gang man. He fulther submm that m batch of cases mcludm WP. No. 172212003 (Mohanlal Dadsana and 0thsrs wv State of Chhatnsgarh and 0th 15), ordérs hm’a bean passsd on 15‘“ Septsmbar 2005. The State Counsel is nct in a p0s1t on to dtspute tins fact Counsel for the petitioner subrmt that the petltxoner approached to the authoritiee but they have not given the‘relief a's therl: 15 no court order, Accordingly this petition hits i been file-(L i t ln'tl e order dated 13 9-7005 pas ed in W P No 1722’7003 in Latch of cases the Court has held as unde1 — "3 ................Purport of the orc er is quite clear and unambiguous as it appearst ‘ from the perusal of the order as Wieli as from the contentions of the petitioners that the gang men Who have not compileted the age of 60 years as on 30-03-2005, they will be allowed to continue till t yiattain the age of ,60 years. It is informed hy the learned counsel for ther’petiti‘ ners(s) that some of the gang men, who have already retired on completion of 30 years of service? have been paid retiral' benefits ie gratuity only Thislwlill be unfiir if the petitioners who have retired before 30 03 2005 on eompletio of 30 veam of service though thev have still some vears to no before 60 years! of ave are not given benefit of order dated 30- m 3005 t l 4. e For the reasons stated above the respondents are dnected to allott all the Gang men who had retired on ompletion of 30 tears of Semee but hate riot l {View In HC‘ 2A § gti $ w‘ia‘qm ' mLmmma 2/! ‘ WW‘&WM. i e wa of 6O Wars to ewin the $ervi’ces 'and continue til] they attain the age of 6O ware subjeu to depcs mg the remal benefats. if amt. given to thcm. » their serwces as Gang man med counsel to1 the petmonexs submlt that me * said pmyel be dlstmssed a9 not lessed at present However the libertv b'e granted to the pennonem to lame the 1ss e of levulauzauon before the apploptuate fomm ‘ } I t i I i 5 I § ! (5) In some of the pet1t1on he petmonem hav: pm} ed for leguianzahon o; 1 ‘ 1f necessary. The petmons W§ h regard_to the prayey of regulanzanon axe I dismissed as not‘pressed With hherty to the petitioners to raise the chspute seeking k ~ redressal of the relief of reouta ‘ lotion if necessary before the appropriate forum (6) In View of the fongo g, the penhons etand aHOWed to the extent indicated above The responderits aie furthei directed to complV With this orde1 Within a period of two monthg from the date of receipt’commumcation of this order No order as to costs i This petition also stands allowec} to the extent of order passed in W P i722’“003 The resnondents are further directed tb coinplv With the orders Wrthin a perrod of mo months from the dwte of eommumemo produetron of this eidei ‘ / i i K Sdl- Fakhrudd'm Jdge C.c. as per rules. l ‘4 t t t “th u