IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.483 of 2011 1. Bhavesh Jha, Son of Late Singheshwar Jha, Resident of village- Bhupatipur, Police Station- Ram Krishna Nagar, District- Patna 2. Umesh Pandey, Son of Late Harihar Panday, Resident of Village – Rang-Mahal Harishchandra Nagar, Police Station- Beur, District Patna 3. Anil Kumar II, Son of Sohan Thakur, Resident of village- Road No.8, Kankarbag Police Station- Kankarbag, District Patna 4. Nandan Tiwari, Son of Sri Brahamdeo Tiwari Resident of Village Madan Chapra, P.S. Purnahia, District Sitamarhi 5. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Son of Sri Yogendra Singh, Resident of Village Chhitrauli, P.S. Mahua, District Vaishali 6. Narendra Kumar Sirivastav, Son of late Basudeo Lal, Resident of Road No. 14, East Ashok Nagar, P.S. Kankarbag, District Patna 7. Niranjan Prasad, Son of Sri Rajendra Prasad Lal, Resident of Muhalla Kadamkuan, P.S. Kadam Kuan, District Patna 8. Yogendra Yadav, Son of Sri Shital Yadav, Resident of Village Pathal Kuria, P.S.- Belhar, District Banka 9. Anil Kumar No.1, Son of Late Ram Keshwar Prasad Singh, Resident of Village Manjhaul, P.S. Manjhaul, District Begusarai 10. Anil Kumar 3, Son of Sri Bansi Ram, Resident of Village Kharika, P.S. Sonpur, District Saran 11. Satyendra Narain Singh, Son of Late Sri Pryag Sing, Resident of Village Daulatpurdih, P.S. Gaurichak, District Patna Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Bihar School Examination Board, Through its Secretary 3. The Dr. Awadhesh Kishore Prasad Yadav, Chairman (Administrator), Bihar School Examination Board Sinha Library Road, Patna 4. Anup Kumar Sinha. The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Sinha Library Road, Patna ---------------------------------- 2 04/ 19.08.2011 In compliance of the order of the High Court dated 8.9.2010 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 4603 of 1999, Annexure-1, the request of the petitioners for regularization in the service of the Bihar School Examination Board (hereinafter referred to as the Board) has been rejected under order bearing Memo No. 538 dated 22.1.2011 holding that at the time of their initial engagement neither reservation policy was followed nor the Board has adopted the resolution of the Government to regularize the services of the daily wage earners. In view of the decision taken by the Board, the contempt petition is disposed of, however, granting the petitioners liberty to challenge the order bearing Memo No. 538 dated 22.1.2011. Arjun/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)