IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM FRIDAY, THE 26TH AUGUST 2011 / 4TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 20621 of 2011(C) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ MEENAKSHI AMMA, KOTTARATHIL KIZHEKKETHIL VEEDU, EDASSERI, ARANMULA. BY ADVS. SRI.M.BALAGOVINDAN, SRI.T.K.ANANDA PADMANABHAN. RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 695 001. 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOZHENCHIRA. 689 641. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARANMULA. 689 533. 4. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR.K.R., S/O.RAMAN PILLAI, KOTTARATHIL HOUSE, EDASSERIMURI, ARANMULA VILLAGE. 689 533. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. C.M.CHARISMA R4 BY ADVS.SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEF, SRI.R.KRISHNAKUMAR (CHERTHALA). THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.20621/2011 C APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE PLAINT O.S.88/2011 DTD. 17/02/2011. P2: COPY OF THE COMMON ORDER PASSED IN I.A.561/2011 IN O.S.94/2011 DTD.11/04/2011. P3: COPY OF THE I.A.1528/2011 OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA ON 5/07/2011. P4: COPY OF THE NOTICE EVIDENCING THE PENDENCY OF DELAY CONDONATION APPLICATION IN UNNUMBERED CMA /2011 AGAINST I.A. 493/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM,JJ. ------------------------------- WP(C).NO. 20621 of 2011 --------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose ,J. On considering this writ petition seeking police protection we directed the 3rd respondent to keep vigil over the place where the petitioner resides and to ensure that no danger is caused to her life on account of the 4th respondent. Today we heard Sri. M.Balagovindan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. S.Mohammed Haneef, learned counsel for the contesting respondents in detail. We heard Smt.C.M.Charisma, learned Government Pleader also. Having regard to the submissions addressed at the bar, we are of the view that the writ petition can be disposed of directing expeditious disposal of Ext.P3. Hence we direct the Munsiff, Adoor or any other court which is to consider Ext.P3 application to expedite the matter and to take an early decision in accordance with law. At any rate the order should be passed on Ext.P3 within one month of receiving copy of this judgment. Till a final decision is taken on Ext.P3, the WP(C) .20621/2011 2 interim order which we have issued on 28.7.2011 will continue. It is needless to mention that the 3rd respondent will be bound to ensure that the life of the 4th respondent is also safe. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM,JUDGE pmn/ WP(C) .20621/2011 3