WP(C) 941/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. M. A. Sheikh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr . S. Banik, learned Standing Counsel, Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council and Mr. Bora, learned Standing Counsel, PWD. As agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition i s disposed of at the motion stage itself. Without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case of the rival par ties, I dispose of the writ petition providing that the respondents may examine the case of the petitioner in terms of the guidelines formulated in Achyut Ranja n Das vs. State of Assam and Others reported in 2006 (4) GLT 674 and the judgmen t dated 02.07.2010 passed in a batch of writ petitions, lead case being W.P.(C) No. 2620/09 (Faziron Nessa vs. State of Assam and Others). Needless to say that the petitioner cannot claim consideration of his case against any particula r post or service and the consideration will be strictly as per the parameters a nd yardsticks laid down in the guidelines. Writ petition is disposed of.