4g HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT B£LASPUR Writ Petition (Art.227) No.89? of 2011 (Writ Petiiion under Article 227 of the Constitqiion of lndia) Mr.Ramkumar Tiwari, counsel for the petitioner. Mr.Akhil Agrawal, Panel Lawyer for respondent No.1/State. Mr.B.D.Badgayya, counsel for respondent No.2. (SB: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Shanna, J.) ORDER (22—1 1—201 1) . By this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia the petitioner has challenged the legality and propriety of the order dated 17.1.2011 passed by the Commissioner, Biiapsur, in Revision Case No.515/A-23/O7-O8, affirming the order dated 31.7.2000 passed by the Additional Coilecior, Bilaspur, in Revenue Case No.119/A-23/99-2000, affirming the order dated 22.7.07 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Kota, in Revenue Case No.760/A—23/96-97, whereby the Sub Divisional Officer has directed for retum of the land to aboriginal tribe. After some arguments, learned counsei for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to nle civil suit for chalienging the procedure prescribed by the revenue authority. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. No order as to costs. 4. interim application stands disposed of. Sdl- T.P. Sharma Judge . Petitioner Ramchandra, S/o. Bisahu, aged Non-applicant No.2 about 6O years, Caste Rawat, R/o. Dabanpur, Tahsi§ Kata, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Applicant Collector, Bilaspur (C.G.) Nun-applicant No.1 2. Saraswati Bai Wldaw of Ghaslya Gond, R/o. Dabanpur, Tahsil 'Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.)