1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1093/1998 SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, NAGPUR AND TWO OTHERS ..vs .. GANESH JAIDEO KHANDEKAR =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mrs. Ketki Joshi, AGP for petitioner . Mr.B.M.Khan, Adv for Respondent. C ORAM : Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota,J. DATED : 11 th MARCH, 2010. The petitioners have filed affidavit on 22 nd February, 2010, stating therein that during the pendency of the writ petition, respondent no.1 appeared in the departmental examination at divisional level for the post of Canal Inspector and successfully passed the same. He has since been appointed as Canal Inspector and the department has also released all the consequential benefits available for the post. Consequently the petition has become infructuous. The learned counsel for respondent no1. Confirms this position. Mrs. Joshi also states that vide communication dated 13/2/2010, the respondent 2 no.1 has informed that he does not want to prosecute the writ petition. In the circumstance, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. JUDGE. Rvjalit