C.R No. 999 of 2010 (O&M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R No. 999 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : March 15, 2010 Union of India and another, ...... Petitioner (s) v. M/S Kay Kube Kompany and others, ...... Respondent(s) *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Ms. Deepali Puri, Advocate for the petitioners. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) This petition has been filed against the order dated 23.10.1999 passed by the appellate Court whereby, even while upholding the setting aside of the award, the matter has been remanded back to the Arbitrator for fresh award. The appellate Court has found that even while setting aside the award, the trial Court did not give any finding that the respondent- Contractor was not entitled to any amount. In fact, even counsel for the petitioners is not in a position to deny that the ground for setting aside the award for want of reasons and that one of the claims were barred. In these C.R No. 999 of 2010 (O&M) ::2:: circumstances, it cannot be said that the Contractor would not be entitled to any amount whatsoever. Consequently, no fault can be found with the procedure adopted by the appellate Court. Resultantly, this petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. As the main petition has since been dismissed, all the pending civil miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) March 15, 2010. JUDGE `kk'