1 W.P.No.333/11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.333 OF 2011. Shantaram S/o Waghu Sonwane ... Petitioner. Versus Shashikant S/o Laxminarayan Biyani and others ... Respondents. ... Mr.V.J.Dixit, Sr.Counsel holding for Mr.A.N.Nagargoje, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.B.V.Wagh, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for the State. ... CORAM : NARESH H.PATIL & : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,JJ. Date : 27.01.2011. PER COURT 1. The petitioner seeks direction to Respondent Nos.3 and 4. The petitioner questions the validity of Resolution No.10 passed by the Respondent No.2 Committee in its meeting dated 2 W.P.No.333/11 30.4.2010. The petitioner filed a petition U/s 41A of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963, suspending the said Resolution that was filed on 10.6.2010. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petition is still pending. The Respondent Nos.3 and 4 filed affidavit-in-reply. The learned Asstt. Govt. Pleader sought instructions and based on which a statement is made by learned Asstt.Govt. Pleader that within three (3) weeks from today the petition addressed to the Director, Marketing (Exh.C) would be decided on its own merits by the competent authority as envisaged U/s 41A of the Act. In light of the same, the Writ petition is disposed of. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) (NARESH H.PATIL,J.) asp/office/wp333.11 3 W.P.No.333/11