IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 24TH JULY 2009 / 2ND SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 20855 of 2009(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- C.RETNAKARAN, S/O. LATE CHELLAYYAN NADAR AGED 64, BIJU VIHAR, PAYATTUVILA P.O., BALARAMAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.B.PRADEEP RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA,REP. BY THE SECRETARY,DEPT. OF CO-OPERATION, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, GOVT. OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE JOING REGISTRAR (G) OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, GOVT. OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPUTRAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.C. SANTHOSHKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- W.P.(C).No.20855 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 24th day of July, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner claims to be the Chief Promoter of Kottukal Co-operative Rural Development Society No.T-1498. He was the President of the Society for two terms. According to the petitioner, in order to locate the Bank of the Society, the Society had taken on lease a building belonging to the petitioner and Ext.P5 is the lease agreement. Petitioner has now received Ext.P6 notice of disqualification issued under Rule 44(1)(d) of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules, to which he has filed Ext.P7, a preliminary reply. It is at that stage, challenging Ext.P6 this writ petition is filed. 3. In my view, it is for the petitioner to file his reply to Ext.P6 notice of disqualification and thereafter it is for the 3rd respondent to consider the matter in the light of the reply and pass final orders thereon. In that view of the WP(c).No.20855/09 2 matter this writ petition is premature. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to file his reply to Ext.P6, within the time already allowed and an order shall be passed by the 3rd respondent. Thereafter, if aggrieved, the petitioner can pursue the matter, if he is aggrieved. Needless to say that any such order passed will be duly communicated to the petitioner. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WP(c).No.20855/09 3