IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15163 of 2009 1. UMESH KUMAR MISHRA S/O SRI NAGESHWAR MISHRA VILLAGE & P.O.- RUPAUL, P.S.- MADHUBANI, DISTT.- MADHUBANI 2. SURAJ KUMAR S/O SRI KRISHNA PRASAD VILLAGE & P.O.- NAUBATPUR, P.S.- NAUBATPUR, DISTT.- PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR-IN-CHIEF HEALTH SERVICES, BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE CIVIL SURGEON-CUM-CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER PATNA 5. THE INCHARGE MEDICAL OFFICER PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, DANAPUR, DISTT.- PATNA With CWJC No.15187 of 2009 1. MUKESH DATTA S/O SRI RABINDRA NATH TIWARI VILL- HARPURA, P.O. MAHMADPUR, P.S. VIKRAM, DISTT. PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HEALTH DEPTT., BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR-IN-CHIEF HEALTH SERVICES, BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE CIVIL SURGEON-CUM-CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER PATNA 5. THE INCHARGE MEDICAL OFFICER PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, BARH, DISTT. PATNA With CWJC No.15233 of 2009 1. REENA PANDEY W/O LATE RAVI SHANKAR PANDEY R/O HOME NO.50, ANANDPURI, BORING CANAL ROAD, NEAR MANORAMA APARTMENT, P.S.- SRI KRISHNA PURI, DISTT.- PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR-IN-CHIEF HEALTH SERVICES, BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE CIVIL SURGEON-CUM-CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER PATNA 5. THE INCHARGE MEDICAL OFFICER PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, VIKRAM, DISTT.- PATNA ----------- 03/ 25.02.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioners and counsel appearing for the State. Petitioners were terminated from their service by the orders dated 07.01.2003, 21.03.2003 and 22.03.2003 contained in Memo Nos. 586(Go), 640(Go), 921(Go) and - 2 - 824(go), Patna, issued by the Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Patna. Petitioners’ prayer is for quashing of the orders of termination on the ground that after remaining in service for a long time they were terminated without following the procedure of terminating a permanent employee. Since after long time the petitioners have challenged the termination orders, which cannot be entertained. However, they may represent their cases before the Civil Surgeon or any appropriate forum challenging the impugned orders. In case of filing such representation by the petitioners, it should be considered and disposed of within twelve weeks by the authority concerned. All these three writ applications are dismissed. DKS/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)