* 1 * W.P.2223-2224.2011 1.8.2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 2223 OF 2011 MANDAKINI RAJENDRA KAKADE .... PETITIONER V/S. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ... RESPONDENT ALONGWITH CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 2224 OF 2011 GAURI SATYAJIT KAKADE AND ANR ... PETITIONER V/S. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .... RESPONDENT * * * * Mr. Ashok Mundargi, Senior Counsel a/w. Mr. J. Shekhar i/by. Mr. Jitendra Pathade, Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. A.S. Pai, APP for the State-respondent. CORAM :- Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J. 1st August, 2011. P.C. :- 1. After the matter is partly argued, Mr. Mundargi, the learned Senior Counsel states that the petitioners do not press the petitions for challenging the condition of depositing amounts, imposed in the order * 2 * W.P.2223-2224.2011 1.8.2011 dated 25th July, 2011 of grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. The petitioners are restricting the petitions to the extention of time granted to them to deposit the amount. The impugned order granted only 3 days time to the petitioners to deposit the amount. In the facts and circumstances of the case, in my opinion, grant of 10 days time to the petitioners would be reasonable. Hence, the petitions are disposed off with a direction that the petitioners may deposit the amount pursuant to the impugned order within a period of 10 days from today. [SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J]