h i ’V"v .:/\ \Via , $ingle Banch; Haa'bh Mi? Justice DhireMm Mishm 5 Arbifr'a'rion 'pglica'ria‘n No 19/200 APPLICANT " ' , ‘ Chha‘i‘ Isgarh Sfm'e :lecfmctfy Board Thraugh ,; I‘rs 5e rzfary, Headquarter Dangamya Rulpur' waywwmm M, ‘ (Ch ha Isgarh) Vs, I NON-APPLICANT5 Mls A curate Transfcwmers Limi‘l‘ed, 8 L.5.C. 3M Ho r, Savi'l‘a Wharf Delh’i- 110Q92 ,, 14 9 2007 Sr. Advaca’fe‘WH’h Mn BD. Guru, Aduncm'e far The applican? Heard This appiica‘l‘ion has b. en fiied under Secfion 11 (6) of The Arbi'l'rcwion 81‘ Conciiia‘rion A, 1996 for appoim'men'f of Arbifra’for. However, learned 5r. Advoca e fér‘ The upplicanf seeks To wi'rhdmw ‘H’Iis applica'finn wifh Iiberf fa file afresh; if necessary, afrer complying wrfh procedure escribed under Chuse 25 0f fhe Accordingly, The apph Ian 15 dismissed as wrfhdrawn wifh ’H’ie Iiberfy d5 prayed for. Mr. Prusham‘ Mishm Cer+ified copy as per r‘ es. ‘ Sd/— Dhirendra Mishl‘a Judge 7% ‘ urbl'l'ru'hon agreemem‘ for app m‘fmenf of Arbri’ra‘i’or i N éwMr'whaaaemawmvv-n ‘ , i ¢ c‘ r c