IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37892 of 2008 KARU MANJHI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 29.10.2009 Heard. The petitioner is alleged to have trespassed the inside house of the informant by breaking the door and assaulting her so much so as being treated as dead. It is further alleged that co-accused Kedar Manjhi and this petitioner took away the daughter of the informant who was subsequently found murdered after being raped. The contention is that the informant has been examined in the trial and there are many absurdity and contradictions in her evidence. It was further contended that there was no eye witness to the occurrence of murder and rape and it is all imaginary. The learned Sessions Judge has referred to some of the paragraphs of the case diary and those have been read out to me by the learned A.P.P. also. The deceased had been found raped before being murdered. The solitary evidence of the informant Kalbatia Devi who 2 has been examined as P.W. 10 in the court below during trial lends some support to the occurrence, considering which the petition is dismissed. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)