^z^l.^.^;;^^ v^^-^"^^^ towi---" i.-y' ?s c^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. Writ Petition (S) No.^,^,-^^, /2010 Petitioners (1) Rakesh Kumar , aged about 32 years S/o Ramkuniar Sahu, R/o- Village Jugdehi, Post Silouti, Tahsil Kurud Distt. Dhamtari. Shiksha Karmi Grade - III (2)'^ Yogeshwar Sinha, aged about 40 years, S/o Hariran-1 Sinha, R/o- Village Silouti, Tahsil Kurud Distt. Dhamtari. Shiksha Karmi Grade - III Ku. Dameshwari, aged about 25 years D/o- Manharan Singh Sahu, R/o- Village - Ravanguda Post Puri,Tahsil - District - Dhamtari Shiksha Karmi Grade-III [4] '• Smt. Chetana, aged about 28 years W/o- Shri Chamanlal Sahu R/o- Village Mokha 8s Post- Silouti, District- Dhamtari Shiksha Karrai Grade-II. Hridayrani aged about 28 years,S/o- Shri Kanhaiyalal Sinha, R/o- Village- Borjhara, Post- Korar Tahsil Kurud, District- Dharatari Shiksha Karmi Grade-III [6] Chandrahas Devangan aged about 31 years, S/o- Netram R/o- Village Kurra, Post Tarsiva Tahsil & District- Dhamtari Shiksha Karmi Grade -III [7] Beshesar Rani Sinha, aged about 36 years S/o- Shri Kuleshwar Prasad R/o- Village- Silghat, Post Semra Tahsil Kurud District - Dhamtari Shiksha Karmi Grade - III [8] Smt Anita Sahu, aged about 29 years w/o- Lokesh Kumar R/o- Village Arjuni, Post Debhar, Tahsil and District - Dhamtari. Shiksha Karmi Grade - III [9] Chamanlal Sahu aged about 29 years, S/o- Shri Laxman Singh R/o- Post Mohka,Post Silouti, Tahsil Kurud, District Dhamtari. Shiksha Karrai Grade - I (1-0) Sohanlal Sahu, aged about 40 year, S/o Shivcharan, R/o Village Jugdehi, Post Silouti, Tahsil Kurud Distt. Dhanitari. Shiksha Karmi Grade - II [11] Smt Anita Sharma, aged about 31 years W/o- Madan Lal, R/o- Village Jugdehi, Post Silouti, Tahsil Kurud Distt. Dhamtari. Shiksha Karmi Grade - III [12] Lomesh Kuraar Sahu, aged about 26 years, S/o- Shri Hiraram, R/o- Village Carota, Post Korra, Tahsil Kurud District Dhamtari. Shiksha Karmi Grade - III [13] Chandsen Dhurve, aged about 33 years, S/o- Shri Thukelram, R/o- Village Chorbhattil Post Dhagouda, Tahsil- Kurud District- Dhamtari. -Shiksha Karmi Grade - II [14] Rajesh Kumar Baghel, aged about 36 years S/o- Shri Kanhaiyalal, R/o- Village and Post - Silouti, Tahsil Kurud Distri.et Dhamtari. Shiksha Karmi Grade - III Versus Respondents 1'^ State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur. 2 Director Public Instruction Office of Director Public Education Raipur. 3 District Education Officer, Dhamtari. 4.- Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Dhamtari WRIT PETITION UNDER^ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS As Stated in the cause title jy ^ 2. Particulars of the Respondents •As Stated in the cause title ^,•1 Qp CHHATTISGABH AT BILASPUR PBTXTIONBR KE.SPONOSNTS '--?y*»'^ W.P.IS) N0. 6S7; Rakesh Ku'mar & Otliers Stsite ofC.G. & Otliers rRIT PETITION UMDgR 22S OF THE. COMSTITUTIOM !!»!!« S.A'SS-i Shri Parag Kotecha, counsel for the petitioners. Shii Suiaesh Bajaj, G.A. 'for the State. ti ^ OA •S Ali ^a&'^A^a^'^ Grievance of fhe petitioners ia this petition is ttiat iainaliy TJiey were appointed as Contra.ct Teacher Grade I! aild thereat'ter as Shilssha Kanai Grade I, II & !II but thev are not beiiig Tiemiitted t.o appear for fhe post of Head Master on the ground that they do not have fhe experience of seven vears as Shiksha Karmi. 2. Counsel for the respondents/Sta.te subiaits th.at. now tue govemment has taken a. decision to peniiit atl those Shilcsha Kaiinis who have the exrierience of seven yeai's eifher on tiie post of Contract Teacher or on the post of Shiksha Kaiiai aa.d therefore, there reiiiams nothing ia fhe preseat petition. He has shown tte leti'er dated 19.11.2010 issued bv fhe D'lrector, public Instructions. Raipur addressed to fhe Advocate General. Copv of tlie said letter has been given to Siiri Kotecha aiso ajid he is satisfied • with the same. Shri Kotecha submit.s that todav i.e. 20.11.2010 is the last date for the petitioners to fill ia the forins aiid if a d.ii-ectioa is not issued to respondent N0.3, the aripMcation forois of the i^etitioners will not be accepted bv it. • 3^ State counsel has no obiectioa if rcsponde.ut ao.3 is da'-ected to a.ccept fee apolicatiosi forms of'fhe netitioEers. 4. In fhe facts aad cii-cuia.stances of IIie case, as nothiog survives ia the petition, it is disposed ofwiffa a directioa to respondent N0.3 to accept tlie application fomis of the peutioners and to pennit theiti to participate ia. fhe exammation iu the Ught of the letter dated 19.11.2010 issued bv tbe Director. Piibhc {iistnictioss. Raioiir. Certified copy today. pritmkerDiwakar Judge