IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.820 of 2010 1. AKHILESH KUMAR S/O LATE NAVNATH SINGH R/O VILL.- SAWAN VIGRAH, P.S.- DARAUNDA, DISTT.- SIWAN 2. DHIRENDRA KUMAR SINGH S/O LATE NAVNATH SINGH R/O VILL.- SAWAN VIGRAH, P.S.- DARAUNDA, DISTT.- SIWAN 3. RAJESH KUMAR SINGH S/O LATE NAVNATH SINGH R/O VILL.- SAWAN VIGRAH, P.S.- DARAUNDA, DISTT.- SIWAN. -------PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS. Versus 1. SRI MUNINDRANATH SINGH S/O LATE SHIV JATAN SINGH R/O VILL.- SAWAN VIGRAH, P.S.- DARAUNDA, DISTT.- SIWAN 2. SRI BHAGWAN SINGH S/O LATE SUDAMA SINGH R/O VILL.- SAWAN VIGRAH, P.S.- DARAUNDA, DISTT.- SIWAN 3. SRI SHALIGRAM SINGH S/O LATE CHANDRA RAI R/O VILL.- SAWAN VIGRAH, P.S.- DARAUNDA, DISTT.- SIWAN 4. SRI SHIVJI SINGH S/O LATE CHANDRA RAI R/O VILL.- SAWAN VIGRAH, P.S.- DARAUNDA, DISTT.- SIWAN 5. SRI RAM SAGAR SINGH S/O LATE SURYADEO RAI R/O VILL.- SAWAN VIGRAH, P.S.- DARAUNDA, DISTT.- SIWAN 6. SRI RAVINDRA SINGH S/O LATE GORAKHNATH SINGH R/O VILL.- SAWAN VIGRAH, P.S.- DARAUNDA, DISTT.- SIWAN 7. SRI VIRENDRA SINGH S/O LATE GORAKHNATH SINGH R/O VILL.- SAWAN VIGRAH, P.S.- DARAUNDA, DISTT.- SIWAN 8. SRI SURENDRA SINGH S/O LATE GORAKHNATH SINGH R/O VILL.- SAWAN VIGRAH, P.S.- DARAUNDA, DISTT.- SIWAN 9. SHANTI DEVI W/O MUNINDRANATH SINGH R/O VILL.- SAWAN VIGRAH, P.S.- DARAUNDA, DISTT.- SIWAN 10. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY LAW DEPTT., BIHAR, PATNA ----------RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS. 2 ----------- 2 14-05-2010 Heard Mr. Shashi Shekhar Dwivedi, learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants. In this intra Court appeal challenge is to the order dated 12.4.2010 passed by the learned Single Judge in C.W.J.C. No.1949 of 2010, whereby the learned Single Judge has declined to interfere with the order passed by the learned Sub. Judge, Siwan in Misc. Appeal No. 10 of 2009. It is submitted by Mr. Dwivedi, learned Senior counsel, that the learned Single Judge should not have dismissed the writ petition as in a suit for partition, during pendency of the suit, no third party interest can be created. Regard being had to the nature of order passed and keeping in view that the learned Single Judge has specifically mentioned that the writ petition was under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, we are only inclined to direct that the suit for partition bearing Title Suit No.557 of 2008 shall be disposed of within a period of eight months. The factum of disposal of the suit shall 3 be intimated to the Registry of this Court. Needless to say, any kind of alienation or creation of third party interest shall be subject to the final result of the suit. The appeal is accordingly disposed of. Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the learned Sub. Judge so that he can act accordingly. (Dipak Misra, C.J.) Abhay Kumar ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)