‘ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT: BILASPUR f W.P. 1%. 3 13 Cb OF 20g PETITIONER I /Ishwar Lal Rajak, aged 47 years, son of late Shri Moti Lal Rajak, resident of Burgess school compound, Magarpara, Bilaspur, tehsil and district Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS ESPONDENTS: /1. State of Chhattisgarh, tnrough the Secretary, department of Chhattisgarh In&astructure Development Corporation (Pariwaan Prabhag), Raipur, . ' General Manager, Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation (Pariwahan Prabhag), Raipur, / 3/ The Depo Manager, ' Chhattisgarh Adhosanrachana Vikas Nigam (Pariwahan Prabhag), Unit Bilaspur. RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF RIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, SUITABLE WRIT, ORDER, OR DIRECTIONS. , R / h W W W’Wrw \ ..9/?:&..§§§H20 mam (W) awsnm Wm aw msmtnai 7 gamma snéw WW#WW§R $Wanéar ' petitioner is ihat the petitioner was appointed on the post of Helperon 15.2.1978 in the erstwhile M.P. State Road Transport deputed to do the work of 3 1. 1.2003 which'earies the Learned counsel fOI difference of pay‘in betwee Cale Taker pertaining to t1 has not been given to the pe During the course of petitioner submits that fox disposed of with a liberty representation before concerned authority may _ representation within a stip1 This limited prayer petitioner seems to be reaso It isv dimcmd that representation along with cc this writ petition before the of three weeks from today, 27.07.2005 Shri K.K{ Jaiswal, copnsal for the petitioner. w.p. No. 3 130 of 200i: Heard on admiwion. The gl‘ievaliCE of the Corporation and the petitioner was Tyre Care Taker hem 19.7.1990 to dih'erent pay of scale. the petitioner submits that the u the two posts of Helper and ’Iyre [e period of 19.7.1990 to 31.1.2003 titioner. arguments, learned counsel for the the present, this petition may, be to the petitioner to tile a detailed the concerned authority and the be directed to dispose of the ilated period granted by this Court. made by learned counsel for the nable and the same is allowed. ilrthe petitioner nles a detailed rh'hed copy of this order and copy of concerned authority within a period then the concerned authority shall SP/FS/2005 - 20,000 0 A) H1200 away a?!Wm amméam r Siam? 11% atréa mmm'§mmx $Wané21 \MW‘ dispose of rapresentation order on each points raist pref€rab1y Within a penc rsccipt of the said repress It is made cleal representation, if any grievance remains with the petitioner, he )ach this Court again. xbservations, the petition stands finally Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge shall be at liberty to appn With the aforesaid ( disposed of. of the petitioner by passing a reasoned d by the petltloner as early as p0351b1e id of three months from the date of ntation‘ that even after decision of the Certified copy as pe r rules. SP/FS/2005 - 20,000 q k. ‘7 '4 ()Q WW$ Mowow amtw (was?)