IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 26724 of 2000 Between: Ravi Venkata Subbarao, S/o. Narasimha, R/o. Narasapur, W.G.District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 District Collector, Eluru, West Godavari. 2 Revenue Divisional officer, Narasapur, West Godavari. 3 Sri Rajagopalaswamy Vari d\Devasthanam, Narasapur, rep.by its Executive Officer, Narasapur, West Godavari. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.SUBRAHMANYAM KURELLA Counsel for the Respondent: The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is ﬁled for the following substantive relief: “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the proposed action of the 2nd respondent in recommending the 3rd respondent to allot an extent of 2 acres of land in R.S.No.145 & 146 in Madhavipalem Village to the prawn traders on out rate sale on private negotiations as a wholly arbitrary, illegal and opposed to the principles of natural justice.” At the hearing, Sri Subrahmanyam Kurella, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Dated 5th September, 2008 vrn