IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8963 of 2010 BHOGILAL YADAV @ BHOGI YADAV, SON OF LATE AGHORI YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16/03/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 47(A) of the Excise Act, 20(1) and 23 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Taking into consideration the fact that for misuse of privilege of bail for a period of about eight years, the petitioner has remained in custody since 30.11.2009, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge (F.T.C.), Supaul, in connection with Special Case No. 11 of 1999 arising out of Raghopur P.S. Case No. 63 of 1999 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. - 2 - The trial court is directed to conclude the trial expeditiously so that there is no further complication in the case. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)