HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAfW AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 2345 of2006 Petitioner : Devendra Kumar Tmari Aged •42 years, Son of Shri Salik Ram Thwari Posted as - L.D.T., At - S.S. Kalibadi Hr. Sec. School, Kalibadi, Raipur, Di^rict - Raipur (C.G.) R/o H.NO. Bhaiya Talab, Near Shiv Mandir, Subhash Nagar, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) Versus Respondente 1. StateofChhatUsgarti.Through- the Secretary, Schoot Educafion Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavian, Raipur 2. The Director, Public Instructions, Chhattisgarh, Head Quarterat- Raipur 3. The Governing Body of feilibadi Shitea SamaU. Through - Its School Secretary, S.S. KaliBadi Hr. Sec. School, Kalibadl, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A. 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB Hon'ble Justice Shri Satish K. Agnihotri Present: Mr.R.K.Kesharwani.counselforthepetitioner Ms. Deepali Pandey, Panel lawyerforthe respondents/State ORDER (Passed on this 16th day ofApril, 2007) The quesUon of law involved herein is whether the non-teachmg staff woridng in Govemment aided school are entided to the benefit of recommendations of the Fifth Pay Commission under the provisions of the Madhya Pradesh AshaskiyaSikshan Sanstha (Adhyapakon Tatha Anya Karmchariyon Ke Vetano Ka Sandaya) Adhiniyam, 1978 (henc^ortti the Adhiniyam, 1978') and the rules irKide ttiereunder read wtth Ure Madhya Pradesh Revision <rf Pay Rules, 1988 (henceforth the Pay Rutes, 1988'). Learned counsel appearing for the petihoner submits that the terms and conditions of the teaching and non-teaching staff are govemed by the same provisions of law which were under consideration by thls Court in the matter of Smt. A. Lall vs. State of ChhatUsgarh and other connected matters (W.P. No. 4108 of 2CXK), wherein bythe juc^ment and onter dated 6.2.2007, this Court held that the petitioners who are worfdng In fully Govemment aided priwite schools are entWed to ttie revised pay-seales with effect from 1.1 .1996 as prescribed under the F'ay Rules, 1988. This Court ftjittier for the purpose of payment of affears had granted<»rtain direction. 3. Admittedly and jointty, tt is submittsd by the parttes tftErt this matter is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 8.22(%)7 passed by this Court in the case of Smt. A. Lall vs. State of ChhsdBsgarh and other connected mattere (Supra). 4. As a result, for the reasons steted in the judgnient and order datsd 6.2.2007 passed in W.P. No. 4108 crf 2005 ^mt. A. Lall vs. State of Chhattisgarh and other connected mattera) (Supra), the wrft pefitisn is allowed in the same terms and condifions. Thakur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge