IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.30056 OF 2008 1. ASHAWANI YADAV, SON OF LATE KAMAL YADAV 2. ARJUN YADAV, SON OF LATE KAMAL YADAV 3. BRICHHA YADAV, SON OF SAHTI YADAV 4. TEDHU YADAV @ DINESHWAR YADAV, SON OF LATE DULAR YADAV 5. SHIV PUJAN YADAV, SON OF LATE DULAR YADAV 6. BIREDNRA YADAV, SON OF LATE DULAR YADAV ALL ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BUDHA MATHIYA, POLICE STATION MAJHAULIA, DISTRICT WEST CHAMPARAN …………………………………………………………………………….PETITIONERS VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. PRAMILA DEVI, WIFE OF BIR BAHADUR MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DUDHA MATHIYA, POLICE STATION MAJHAULIA, DISTRICT WEST CHAMPARAN ……………………………………………………………………….OPPOSITE PARTIES ********* 2 23/06/2011 The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 13.05.2008 passed in Complaint Case No. 1887-C of 2007 by which the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bettiah (West Champaran) has taken cognizance for the offences alleged to have been committed under Sections 341, 323, 342, 379, 384 & 354 of the Indian Penal Code. The Court below on perusing the materials available on the records has found that prima facie a case is made out against the petitioners under Sections 341, 323, 342, 379, 384 & 354 of the Indian Penal Code and as such, has taken cognizance. I find no illegality in the order impugned. This application is accordingly dismissed. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )