. ’BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI J. S.B. : HON Jlwan Lal Kosle aged about 35 yeals Son of Shn Mansha Ram Kosie Occupat1on-Serv1cc Prassntly working as Assistant Teacher Goyt Middle School; Khainda (3)5 Blook Baloda BaZar, Tahsil Baloda Bazar, District Raipur (C,G.) VERSUS 1 State of Chhattlsgarh Through The Secretary, Department of School Educatlon DKS Bhawa Ra1purv (C.G-.) ' / . The Commissioner, Depértment of Tribal Welfare, Raipur (C.G.) v , The Director, Public Instructions & Education Raipur (C.G.) ‘ PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Present. . Smt Hamida Sidchque Advocate for petitioner Smt Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govt Advocate for the State/ respondents, V oRnER ¥ (Passed on 225E of March, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed vide order dated 29.06.1993 for a period oftwo years on probation on the pay scale of Rs. 1200/— pm. and thereaften he was paid regular pay scale. l—a HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR he ueion o a inVOIVd herei s to whether the petitioner 'is T qst f lw g n a nted o mguar ay cala crf thg data of initial appointmant or em t l p s w, from th dai§ compQtion of obion period. e of l prat Learned counsel appearig fr the etitioner as well as. for the n o p tate/rdent ointly submit tht the fats and question of law Sespons j a c involved in the prent rit etition are the same to that of in es w p .P,(S) \. 56/206 (Suhi Tiwari and others Vs. State W No 970 sl Goverment of Chattisgarh Others), which was allowed Vide n h & order dated 7, l 1 .2006. In iew te abOve-stat smissions ade by learned counsel V of h ed ub m ort parties, the writ etitn allowed n the Same terms. No ordr to cost: e as s Sd/ Satish K. hgnihotfi Judge @ fhe pio is i