sXR l-IIGIliCOURTORCHHArTlSGft&MAtBILASPUR DB: l-16n't}lesShriiI3hiirendraMiSihr & l-lon'ble'ShCTil^N^^naraltar.J WritRefEitionfClNo. 5709 6T 2010 Petitjoner Rto Kurre;fti^ ^hrough Ifs^BrQRneto^ Shri Manty,KuFre,^ S/o S^n£KhenK^ Kun^, c^d a^ Minakshi Nagar (Borshi), Behindi K.0. Pubtic School, Distt. & Tahsil Dyrg (C.G.) Vs. Respondents 1. St^e M ^ Seci^ary^ iDeRaftmeht^^ C^untFy^ Rlannirig, , D.K.S^^BI'ia^ni^ ,Raipur.(C.G.}'';:,.':. j •:::':. ;: ^ ,':l:^;:i^ .) • • • ...'. ..,. '..' ' " '".:.:": :.:'. 2. Mynicipal^Gorpioration Durg, 'Tttroygh.lte Commissiooer, Distt. & Taligit ^©Hi'g ,,;,^,:.'<G.G.),.'-,;^<,',/ 3. The CommissioHer,^^^^^^ @^ '-;,^ :^U:rfc)an''''::^Develppment,;,-^|^8vtu^ Chhattisgarh, R.DA.jBuildin&^ ^ :,•' ..,l;Distt/;;Raipur:(C.G.)'':- LJ.;:.,^^ 4, Coilgetor & BistricA Ma^ Distt. Durg (G.G.) .. 5. Shri S.K; Sundami, ^resentl^ workiBgjas :Dy..,^;: .^GommissiDner^'.^;^ Corporation, Raipw; ^stt^ ;& ^H^ ::RaipurL(C.G.)'.;',./;|:.': •.:•':'•; 6. ExecutiVe Eng|Reer i raunicij^l! CorporatiQn, Durg, iOistt. & T'ahsiit ;iayi^| ,.<C^J:::....,:.f;:-^ WritPetiti6nun(lerArticle226ol:tttei©6hstitution6flnclia Present: Shri Sgif Khan with Shri ^/aibhay Shukla, counsel the'petitioner.'::l...,.;~;,^::,,',,'^:;.^^ ,^ Shri y.N;S. 0eo, Gc^. [AdvoG^ :State/respon<:ients;^.:l:^:.:?/''- •.::'.'.^^ forl ^Sf^m ^s'ssga ii"y':: ttl IS$ ffi ttiiU h^-I°hwN Wsl flfili ;:'38Bi WiII i>'S(K3 •3t("iil ;<Mt!!;ia IB •^••;^. ^^ thiel iliSIIir WBII ^O^ft'l.^R^£;iR:i (Passe<:l^onO'4;l©.2©tC iiW?: ^^H^I^'•i iSflB BBK iilillis saga 9S ;ll^jl^ ^^l^i' IBBSI ffilt •';"^i^ Vija'? PerDtiirendraMlshra.J 1. The petitioner hasfiled this petition and prays for following reliefs:- i) This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records ofthesaid Case. ii) That, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to grant him paymentofRs.12.51acswith interest for the workof manufacturing and fixing of extended statue. iii) That, this Hon'ble Court be please to issue a writ of mandamys deelarir®that the action of fhe respondents isillegal, arbitrary andunconstitutional. iv) Any other relief as deemed flt and proper by this Hqn'ble court- ' ^ ^^v 2. Learned eounsel for the petitioner fairly submits that this is an agreement betweenlhe parties with respect to the tender work. He seekstowithdrawthispetitionwithlibertytoproceedunderclause17 ofthe agreement,which prpvides for resolution of the dispute arising putoftheeontractagreementthrougharbitration. , 3. AGCordingly, this petition is di'wnissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge SdA- 4 R.N. Chandrakarl Judge