OF CE ^'RSPONTIKT' ^T-? ¥/ rnpT^'&^T /£?•• Nefa W/o Shri Ra years, ft H.S.SchooL Kondagaon, n (Now- Smt. Naraite'' ladhin Nafaite Age about [. Teacher, Govt. Girls Kondagaon, Block- ?agdalpur (C. 'Js-^dalDur (C--G,^ 1. Through:-Secretary, Education & Tribal Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Welfare Department Jagdalpui ^, tilOCK li^BC^tXOIl Kondagaon, Distt. (C.G.) •r Block- Jagdalpur T, U1S1 ^ !-m^r' 0 Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. 3hri Arvind Dubey, Pane' Lawyet for the State / respondents. Passed on 5m ofApril, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/'respondents join'dy submit that the fact an< question of law involved in the prssent writ petition are the to that of in Yashwant Kumar Vs. Municipal Corporatior., Durg another {^ 1) r s) i^jLX OA^- ?}, which has beea disposed of vide order .04.2006. L.eamed counsel appearing for the re.spondeirts does aot controvert the said submission. 2. IB subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petitioa (S.) No.4130 of C?<! ^hhattisgarh another) and other connected matters, decided by this Court on 15-12-2006, pursiiant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Hploma in Education Examination, it was clarified that the nomenclature ofthe Basic Training Institute. i'.e., B.T.I. has been changed and renamed a.s Diploma in Ed'ucation, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2.005 (Gopesh Verma vs, The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh (Supra). Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case ofYashwant i/ % 'V^^ subiect to verification of tlie fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired D.E.d. Examination Certificate on herowc expenses as per the circulars dated24.12.1998 and 01.03'.1999 and further whsther she has been paid two advance iacrements or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Amit