IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.506 of 2008 AMIRUL HAQUE S/o Late Jaitullah resident of Village Chaurav P.S. and Dist. Gopalganj Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2 03.12.2008 This revision application has been preferred against the order dated 17.4.2008 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Gopalganj in Misc. case no. 48 of 2006 whereby the petitioner has been directed to pay maintenance to opposite party no.2 at the rate of Rs 1500/- per month. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order. On perusal of the impugned order, it is quite apparent that there is no dispute that the opposite party no.2 is legally wedded wife of the petitioner and four children have born out of their wedlock and they were living separately from the petitioner. In the circumstance, the court below has rightly awarded maintenance to opposite party no.2. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is simply a labour. He has no means to pay Rs 1500/- per month as a maintenance. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as means of the petitioner, I am not inclined to - 2 - interfere in the impugned judgment. The petitioner is directed to pay maintenance, present and future, by 10th of the next following month and the arrears amount shall also be paid to the opposite party no.2 as directed by the court below but in four equal instalments within a period of six months. This disposes of the application. shahid (Ghanshyam Prasad, J)