IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17193 of 2009 1. PUNAM KUMARI @ PUNAM DEVI W/O DEELIP KUMAR MISHRA R/O VILL YADUPATTI SIMARI, P.S.PUPARI, DISTT-SITAMARHI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT SOCIAL WELFARE BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR, INTERGRATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DIRECTORATE, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT - MAGISTRATE, SITAMARHI 4. THE DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER, SITAMARHI 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, CHORAUT, SITAMARHI 6. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, CHORAUT, SITAMARHI 7. SMT. SHISHA KUMARI W/O NAVIN CHANDRA DATT. R/O VILL-SIMARI, P.S.PUPARI, DISTT- SITAMARHI ----------- 02 04.02.2010 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State is present. Learned counsel for the State suggests that if the petitioner is interested in pursuing the matter, she has her remedy before the District Magistrate against the appointment of respondent no.7 on the post of Anganbari Sewika for which he has represented before the District Magistrate himself on 11.7.2007, when he was competent to hear such matters. If the petitioner has filed a representation before the District Magistrate, and she is desirous to pursue the matter and appears before him with the copy of present order within a maximum period of four weeks, only in that, if District Magistrate is required to decide the matter after hearing all 2 concerned, including respondent no.7, by a reasoned and speaking order. The writ application stands disposed. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)