: 1 : USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER OF SUMMONS NO.1075 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.892 OF 2009 Deepak Naraindas Bathija ..Plaintiff V/s. K. Mani Naidu ..Defendant ..... Mr. Jitendra Patil for the plaintiff Mr. Suresh Rajeshwar for the defendant ..... CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 7th AUGUST, 2009. P.C. : 1. After perusing this chamber summons and the affidavit in support and considering the reply of the defendant which has been filed to the plaintiff s notice of motion, in my view in the facts peculiar to this case, interest of justice would be sub-served if the plaintiff is allowed to amend the plaint and the notice of motion as per the schedule to this chamber summons. 2. This amendment is allowed considering that it was the defendant who has informed the plaintiff on affidavit that the agreement is executed in favour of third parties. In such circumstances, the plaint is permitted to be amended. : 2 : Chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c). Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. No Order as to costs. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)