IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.107 of 2011 Rekha & Ors Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. 6/ 14/09/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the opposite parties. In pursuance of the order of the Writ Court the representation has been disposed. The correctness of the fresh order strictly speaking cannot be scrutinized in the contempt proceeding. Learned counsel for the petitioner however raised the issue that this Court in the contempt proceeding can still examine matters if the opposite parties have passed orders in teeth of not only government instructions to the contrary but also in violation of court orders. It was contended that a Madhyama degree holder could not have applied much less been appointed by unseating the petitioner based on any application submitted by the former prior to amendment of Rule-5 on 31.1.2008. He submits that if the petitioner was wrongly removed from service he shall have a claim for salary for the period that he was wrongly prevented from working. There were no directions in the writ petition for any payments. It is not possible to examine that 2 aspect in the contempt jurisdiction. Once the representation has been disposed and the term of the Gram Kutchery has expired when no substantive relief of reinstatement can follow to the petitioner, the Court is not persuaded to proceed any further in the contempt jurisdiction. All other grievances as noticed in the present order can be appropriately agitated in a fresh writ application only. The contempt application is disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)