IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 16TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 27TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 5044 of 2009(A) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- UMMER.A, S/O. KUNJALAVI, ALAYAN, KATTUKULAM. BY ADV. MR.MANSOOR.B.H. RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, MANNARKKAD. 2. VILLAGE OFFICER, ALANALLUR. 3. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD. MR.P.N.SANTHOSH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.5044 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 16th day of February, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P1 notice of eviction. According to the petitioner, notice was issued without even surveying or demarcating the property. Aggrieved by this, he has filed Ext.P4 objection and orders have not been passed. The petitioner apprehends that Ext.P1 notice will be implemented in the meanwhile. 2. As already noticed, the grievance of the petitioner is mainly that the property has not been surveyed or demarcated, which he has raised in Ext.P4. Therefore, it is essential for the 1st respondent to consider the matter. 3. Accordingly, I direct the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P1 in the light of Ext.P4 objection raised by the petitioner and pass orders thereon. It is directed that orders as above shall be passed as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. 4. In the meanwhile, further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P1 WP(C) No.5044/2009 -2- will be kept in abeyance. 5. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg