WP(C) 3230/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTIC B P KATAKEY Heard Mr N Mahammad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs HM Phukan, learn ed state counsel appearing for the respondents. The grievance of the petitioner is that on basis of a FIR lodged by him though Hatigaon PS case no.79/ 2011 under Sections 147/149/294/323/325/336/506/4 27 of Indian Penal Code was registered, yet no proper investigation has been car ried out by the investigating agency. In the backdrop of such assertion of the petitioner, this Court, by earl ier orders passed, directed the learned state counsel to obtain instructions rel ating to the stage of investigation into the said police station case. Learned state counsel, on the basis of the written instruction dated 9th August 2011 received today from the Sr Superintendent of Police, City, Guwahati, submit ted that in Hatigaon PS case no.79/2011, charge-sheet has already been filed. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that though the alle gation against the accused is of serious nature, charge-sheet was filed for init iation of criminal proceeding for a bailable offence which indicates that no pro per investigation had been carried out. It is not in dispute that the charge-sheet had been filed, as has been s tated above. It is, therefore, open to the petitioner to approach the appropriat e criminal court ventilating his grievances, if any, relating to investigation. In view of above, the writ petition is closed. Copy of the written instructions dated 9.8.2011, as produced by the lear ned state counsel, is kept on record.