-#- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1109 OF 2006 Subhadra Pandurang Tupe ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Mah. & Ors.... Respondents Mr.Arshad Shaikh with Mr. V.M. Parkar for Petitioner. Mr. A. Sayed, A.G.P. for R.No.1. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA JJ ANOOP V. MOHTA JJ ANOOP V. MOHTA JJ. DATE : 4th May, 2006 DATE : 4th May, 2006 DATE : 4th May, 2006 P.C.: . Rule. By consent heard forthwith. . It is the case of the Petitioner that though her marriage has not been dissolved, she has been staying seperately from her husband in an independent structure. The Respondent themselves have issued notices to her on 10.5.1993 and 12.2.1997. The same are annexed as annexures to the Petition. It is the case of the Petitioner that without considering the claim for rehabilitation, the respondents are seeking to demolish the structure. . This court has by its judgments has directed the Respondents that those who are eligible cannot be displaced without rehabilitating them. That order will also apply in the case of Petitioner if the Petitioner is so entitled. In the light of that, Petitioner to file her application to Respondent No. 4 along with the documentary evidence within two weeks from today. The Respondent No. 4 thereafter to decide the same according to law within two weeks thereafter. With the above observations, Petition stands disposed of. (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, J.) J.) J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)