1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR W.P.No.3812 of 2007 (Ramdas Bhimaji Nimrad .vs. State & Ors.) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CORAM : D.D.Sinha and Mrs. Vasanti A. Naik, JJ. DATE : January 21, 2008. Heard Mr. A.D.Mohgaonkar, Adv. for the Petitioner, Mr.Khubalkar, Assistant Government Pleader for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2, Mr.N.D.Khamborkar, Adv. for the Respondent No.3 and Mr.R.K.Deshpande, Adv. for the Respondent No.4. Mr.Khubalkar, Assistant Government Pleader for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 states that the respondent no.2 has filed an affidavit dt. 14.1.2008 and in para no.2 of the said affidavit, the respondent no.2 has specifically mentioned that the respondent no.2 is ready to re-consider the entire issue relating to promotion of the petitioner as well as the respondent no.4 to the post of Head Master in the light of the judgment of this Court reported in 2006 (6) Mh.L.J. 882 (New English High School Association, Nagpur and another vs. Baldev s/o. Fakira Ade and another) and also in the light of the Government Circular dt. 23.10.2007, after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the respondent no.4 and will take a decision accordingly. 2 In the backdrop of the above referred facts, it will be appropriate to dispose of the petition in view of the statement made by the respondent no.2 in para 2 of the said affidavit. Hence, the petition is disposed of. We expect the Education Officer to complete the process within six weeks. JUDGE JUDGE ssj