~€-,.y.. HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.A.No. 954 of 2005 AppeUant National Insursince Co. Ltd.Through iteAssistsuitManager,B-l,^^1^^ Comptex, 2nd Ploor, Ring Road No.2, Rny^darshiai Na^rf, Bilaspur, Chhattjsgarh. Versus Respondents 1. Pyarelal, S/oTiharu Halba, aged about40 yeara, Occiq^aticm- Driver of Tmck No. C.G. 07/C-0770, R/o ViUage: Kamta, P.S. Dondi, District Durgf Chhatdsgarh. 2, SadaDaiidSwaim,S/oI.R<Swami, e^ed about 45 years, Occupat&Mi- Owner ofTruck No. C.Gr. 07/C-OT^ R/p I4^iids Taiktfs^ New Bus Stand, Dallirajhara, District-Duxg, Chliattisgarh, 3, Ku. Annupa, D/o Kaahaiyalal Sahu, agpd about 9 yeara (imaaor), Th^ her fetfher Kaah^ Sahu, S/o BhiilauLramSahu, ag^^e^ years, R/o Salhedhorc/Tehsil- Lormi, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, DB: Hon'ble ShriJustice S. R. Nayak, C.J. fc Hon'ble Shri Justfce Satish K, Agaitiotrii, J. Mr, Saajay K, Agaiwal, Advocate, for fhe agppellacit Mr. Avinash K. Mishia, Advocate for fhe Responxlent No.3. ^^'€ ORALORDBR (14A December 2005) The foUofwuig order offhe Court was passed by 8. R* Nayak* C.J. 1. This is aa appeal by fhe Insurance Compaiay. In the impu^ award fhe M.A.C.T/^has recorded a fmdmg that llie drh^^ of fhe motor vehicle involved ia the accident on fhe date of acddeiit did not have vatid aad eJG^five driviag Kcence. In fhat view of tfae matter, it hasJ^tened the Mabil^ of fhe vehide immlved ia fhe accident. However, M.A,C«T, has directed the ^\, r: . '•' 'l 21 ^ 2. JnsuraDce Company to deposit fhe compensatioa m fhe first mstaoce and then to take appropriate steps for recoveiy of fhe amcmnt fix^m fhe ia^su^ WImt has been done by fhe M.A.C.T. is ia accoxxiaoGe with fhe law as laid dowii by fhe Supreme Court m Watlonal lawiuraace <U>mi»any Ltd. y»*Swarn Sttn^h and otiiw (2004[3] S.C.C. 297). In fhat view criF tihe matter, we do aot fuad aoy txierit m fhis appeaL It is accordmgty dismissed. No costs, Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI Judge Thakur ^c