IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO:3297 of 2002 Between: Muluguri Bikshapathi S/o Laxminarayana R/o Parkal Village and Mandal, Warangal District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 A. Jaya Sankar S/o Narasimharamaiah Parkal, Warangal District. 2 The District Collector, Warangal. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.BICHAIAH Counsel for the Respondents:AGP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying aﬃdavit, the petitioner herein prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st Respondent ﬁling Election petition O.P. 2/2001 on the ﬁle of the Election Tribunal (Junior Civil Judges Court Parkal) on behalf of Dr. Srirangi Santhosh Kumar petitioner in the above O.P. against the respondent representing the Govt including 2nd Respondent and later appearing on half of respondents Govt. servants including 2nd Respondent as illegal, and against the Advocates Act 1961 and direct 2nd Respondent to appoint and engage another Assistant Govt. Pleader to defend the respondents 8 to 14 i.e. Govt. Oﬃcers in the above O.P. 2 of 2001 on the ﬁle of the Election Tribunal, (Junior Civil Judge) Parkal.” At the hearing, Sri A.Bichaiah, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as such. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, interim order, dated 20.02.2002 is vacated and WPMP.No.4040 of 2002 is dismissed. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 14th NOVEMBER, 2008. kvni