1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.2538 OF 2009 Mohemmad Shafiq s/o Shaikh Yusuf ..PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Mah. & ors. ..RESPONDENTS Mr P.V. Jadhavar, Advocate for the petitioner; Mr K.G. Patil, A.G.P. for respondents no.1 & 2; Mr B.L. Sagar, Advocate for respondent no.2; Mr V.D. Hon, Advocate for respondent no.3; Mr V.P. Latange, Advocate for respondent no.4. CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND NARESH H. PATIL, JJ. DATE : 13th November, 2009 PER COURT : This petition has been circulated before us for speaking to minutes. It appears that this petition, by our judgment dated 18th September, 2009, was allowed and we had directed the respondent - Committee to decide the caste claim of the petitioner afresh. However, while directing as stated above, we had further directed that no adverse action be taken against the petitioner, instead of respondent no.3. It appears that this is an inadvertent mistake and the interest of respondent no.3 ought to be 2 protected. In that light of the matter, therefore, we allow this motion of speaking to minutes and direct that correction be carried out in the judgment in paragraph 3 at two places where the word "petitioner" appears it be substituted by word "respondent no.3". Corrections be carried out forthwith and certified copies be issued afresh. ( NARESH H. PATIL, J.) ( P. V. HARDAS, J.) amj/wp2538.09A