1 69 wp.8249.10 ndm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8249 OF 2010 Nagnath Shripati Lonkar and others. ... Petitioners Versus Gilan Framroz Irani. ... Respondent ----- Mr. Ashok B. Tajane for the Petitioners. Mr. P.Bhandari for the Respondent. ----- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 15 th July, 2011. P.C. 1 Heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the Petitioners. 2 By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioners who are the original plaintiffs have taken an exception to the order dated 16 th September, 2010 by which the application for amendment of the written statement made by the Respondent – defendant has been allowed. The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners by relying upon various decisions submits that the impugned order is illegal. 2 69 wp.8249.10 3 The impugned order granting amendment of the written statement is capable of being challenged in an appeal which may be preferred by the Petitioners against the decree in the suit, if the same is adverse to the Petitioners. At this stage, when the suit is at the stage of recording of evidence, no interference is called for. Subject to what is observed above, the writ petition is rejected. 4 All contentions of the parties on merits are kept open. [ A.S.OKA, J ]