IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.1013 of 2005 Between: B.Sanjeeva Kumar, s/o B.Sailu, Behind Geeta Mandir, Currency Nagar, Ramavarapadu, Vijayawada, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Senior Manager (A.T.C.), Air Ports Authority of India, Vijayawada Airport, Gannavaram, Krishna District. 2 The District Employment Officer, o/o The District Employment Exchange, Vijayawada, Krishna District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondents in not allowing me to appear for written test/interview for selection and appointment to the post of Junior Attendant as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India reported in 1996(6) Scale 676 in Excise Superintendent, Malakapatnam, Krishna District Vs.K.B.S.Visweswara Rao and consequently to direct the respondents to consider petitioner case for selection and appointment to the post of Junior Attendant without insisting that the petitioner's name should be sponsored by the Employment Exchange and pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may be deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.P.RAJU Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.E.MADAN MOHAN RAO The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.1013 of 2005 ORDER: The only grievance of the petitioner is to direct the 1st respondent to consider his case for appointment to the post of Junior Attendant without insisting on his name being sponsored by the employment exchange as per the Judgment of the Supreme Court. As the scheduled date of interview was already expired, I am of the opinion that nothing survives in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 13-03-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RS}