HIGHCOURTOFCHHMTISQARHATBiLASPUR DiyiSiQN^BENCH CORAM: HON'Bt-ESHRIRAJEEVGUPTA.CJ. HON''BLESHRlSUNlLKUMARS!NHft.J Petitioner Respondents 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Sunita Yadav, D/o Shri Prahalad Yadav, aged about, 34 years, R/o VVard No.2, Takhafpur, district Bifaspur (C.G.) VERSUS Stafe . 'of Ghhattisgarh, ^ through 'the Secretary, Department of Urban Administration and Deveiopment, D.K.S. Bhawan,Raipur(C,G.) Smt. Sarita Thakur, daughter of Shri Cheedi Singh Thakur, R/o ward, No.2. Thakurpara, TaMiatpur, distliet Bilaspur Chief Mynicipaf Officer, ; Nagar Papchayat, Takhatpur, district Bitaspur Project Officer, tntegrated j Child Development Project, Takhatpur, district Bilaspur.(C.©.) Director, Directorate of i Urban Administration and ^ Development, Raipur(C.G.) - ' , 6. AdditipnalCollectpr,Bilaspur(C,G.) Writ appeat under Sect«o 2(1)ofCtihattisaarh MialT Court (ADDealtoDtvisionBenchlRiUles.ZOOe. ShriAnupN^umdar,GQun^fbrtheappel)ant, Stiri hore BbSidun; ftdclitional Advb&ate Qeneral for theState/resf^ndertfe-No.:lY4;.5&!6.<;f^.:.;.^' i ^Sanai^Eit ^-o ith (1fn November, 2010) The following judgment of the Court was passed Learned counsel for the parties are heard. 2) The appeilant/ petitioner has filed this writ appeal against the impugned order dated 11-08-2010 passed in W.P.(S) No.4324/2010,wherebythelearnedSingle Judge has dismissed the petitioner's application fof grantof interim relief. 3) Considering the nature of the controversy involved in the matter, we deem it properto direct an out ofturn hearing of the writ petition .itself. 4) Registry, therefore, is directed to post W.P.(S) Np.4324/2010 forfinal hearing in the weekcommencing 29-11-2010. 5) With theabove direction, the writ appeal stands djsposed of. Sd/- Chief Justice ~*1. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge /