IS^. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BlLASPUR M. C. C. No. 575 OF 2011 S. B. ^<i^£t "^^ APPLICANT PETITIONER RESPONDENT .^^5^- v'^^r' ^-^^'2- Sudarshan -Kumar Mandal, S/o. Shri S.K. Mandal, aged about 31 years, R/o. Ward Bakharupara, Narayanpur, District Narayanpur (C. G.). VB R-S U S : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary, Urban Administrative Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, (C.G.) v^L^'a^ ~9^r O' Commissioner/ Director, Directorate, Urban Administrative & Development Department, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Chief Municipality Officer, Nagan Panchayat Narayanpur, District Narayanpur (C. G.) 4. President in Council, Nagar Panchayat Narayanpur, District Narayanpur (C. G.) APPUCATION FOR MODIFICATION OF ORDER DATED 12.05.2011 PASSED IN W.P. (S) N0. 2582/2011 T^F ~;::!:iT?iT?:TC?,'©^raTi^'.fsi^wu< l^ .c.c:,Nv.$?)-^7n^^ "f" sn^ .1;! 'RFrre '=?S!H s?Ki?l '^iT^' 4^/ SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. ^Nwft^ WT?S •? •'T^Ti:t 02-09-2011 Shri SomkantVerma, counsel fojr the petitioner. Shri Rakesh Jha, Deputy I Government Advocate for the State/respondents No.1 & 2-en advanc^ copy. Heard on prayer for modification} Learned counsel for the petitio^ier submits that the petitioner had filed a writ petition aggrieved by inaption in the matter of appointment despite his selection. On 12-05-2011, the writ petition (W.P.(S)No.2582 of 2011) was finally disposed off with ^ direction to respondents to take appropriate decision in the matter. Lqiter on, petitioner was informed by Bhupesh Singh that he has filed writ| impleading petitioner as pari:y, challeniging his selection, in which, interim order has beenpassed on 28-03-2011 basis of recommendation made for (Jirecting no steps to be taken on the [appointment of the petitioner. He submits that the notice of the afores^iid writ petition (W.P.(S)No.1304 of 2011) was not served upon the petitiorjer, and therefore, the petitioner had rio notice or knowledge about penderjcy of the said writ petition or order passed therein and he came to l^now only after the Writ Petition (S)No.2582 of 2011 was finally disposj Learned counsel submits that in thes^ 2011 may be recalled and the petition^r may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition as the petitioner intends tjs contest and protect his interest in Writ Petition (S) No. 1 304 of 2011. petition (W.P.(S)No.1304 of 2011) id off by this Court on 12-05-2011. circumstances, order dated 12-05- w«f\vAjli i!;"ii»ui,u^-iwii^— FS/140—2/2011—1,50,000. ^qrawr, ei^y'i^, 'feTRry aTl^i '•SS1 f<^N? wn?n"'%s'R!^ c^ Tumane TOnw^tow^i •L1 TpiferaN wr^f ^ •='?st' '^sil'ns"" Taking into consideration the sijbmission made by learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into ccyisideration that before order was passed by this Court on 12-05-2011 ir| W.P.(S)No.2582 of 2011, in a writ petition filed by one Bhupesh Singhj (i.e.W.P(S)No.1304 of 2011), an interim order was passed on 28-03-2011 directing no steps to be taken on i the basis of the recommendations maijle for appointment of the petitioner, order dated 12-05-2011 is herebyj recalled and the writ petition (W.P.(S)No.2582 of 2011) is dismiss^d as withdrawn, however, reserving liberty to the petitioner, as prayed for. j With the aforesaid observation, the petition is finally disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge WW^T^-Ail ^"ITfi^, <ls4-<i<4*li<(—FS/140—2/2011—1,50,000.