1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4285 OF 2006 Sudhir Singh Panesar .. Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents Mr.Kuldip S. Patil for applicant Mr.S.S.Pednekar, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 1st December 2006. P.C. . This is an application for transit bail. Mr.Patil invites my attention to the notice under Form No.25.2(1) issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Anti-Robbery Cell, Crime Branch, New Delhi and submits that although this notice purports to state that the applicant’s attendance is required in connection with investigation in the light of the averments in the application, he has apprehension of arrest. 2 All that Mr.Patil submits is that the applicant would attend Chanakyapuri Police Station but protection be granted to him so as to enable him to apply for appropriate reliefs in case he is apprehending arrest, which application, of course, would be made before the Competent Authority at New Delhi. 2. To enable the applicant to take appropriate steps in accordance with law, in case he apprehends arrest by the aforesaid authority at New Delhi, it is directed that the applicant shall not be arrested for a period of two weeks from today. Needless to state that the order restraining/prohibiting his arrest would come to an end upon expiry of this period, without reference to this Court. Application disposed of. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)