IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2046 of 2007 PATIA DEVI, W/O LATE RAMDEO PASWAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-SHIVGANJ, P.O. BAJAURA, P.S. DOBHI, DISTRICT-GAYA. ............PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT (POLICE) BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GAYA 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GAYA. 4. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR PATNA. ...............RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02/ 13-04-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. In this case counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent no. 2 stating therein to the effect that during the pendency of this application the grievances of the petitioner have been redressed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the statements made in the counter affidavit, the writ application is not pressed. However, he seeks liberty to represent the authority with respect to left out grievances, if any. In view of the above circumstances, the writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to represent his grievances, if any, which is remained un- redressed before the respondent no. 2 District Magistrate, Gaya. In case, such representation is filed within a period of six weeks’ along with the certified copy of present order, respondent no. 2 shall consider the same and dispose of by a - 2 - reasoned order in accordance with law. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. S.Sb/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)