S.B.CRIMINAL MISC.II BAIL APPLICATION NO.5163/2006 Date : 17.11.2006 HON'BLE MR. SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. R.K. Bishnoi for the applicant. Mr. Vishnu Kachhawaha, Public Prosecutor for State. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the impugned order. Looking to the alleged quantity of the contraband material recovered from the house of the applicant and taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the present case, I do not feel inclined to extend benefit of bail to the applicant. Accordingly, the bail application moved by the applicant under Section 439 Cr.P.C. stands rejected. However, the learned trial court shall record in preference statements of independent witnesses and Seizure Officer. After recording of statements of the above witnesses, if any bail application is moved by the applicant before the learned trial, then, the learned trial court shall decide the same in accordance with law. The learned trial court may also expedite trial. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J. vij