IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 6483 of 1999 Between: I.Sreenivasa Raju S/o.Satyanarayana Raju Office of DLTC/ITI, Cuddapah ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Driector of Employment & Training BRKR Building, Tankbund Road, Hyderabad 2 Government of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Secretary Labour and Employment Secretariat, Hyderabad 3 A.P.Administrative Tribunal Hyderabad, rep.by its Registrar 4 D.Brahmeswara Rao S/o.late B.Tirupathaiah Govt. ITI, Vijayawada .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or writs, order or direction declaring the action of the respondents No.1 and 2 in not promoting the petitioner to the post of principal on the sole ground that charges and departmental proceedings are pending against him as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction by setting aside the order Dt.15/03/99 passed in OA.No.6008/1998 on the file of the third respondent and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith promote the petitioner as Principal from the date he was eligible as per DPC 1997 award costs and pass such other order. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.N.SRIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: G.P. FOR SERVICES-I. MS.S.TRIPURA SUNDARI The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Smt. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH W.P. No. 6483 of 1999 O R D E R: (Per THE HON’BLE Smt. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI) Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. T. MEENA KUMARI, J. G. CHANDRAIAH, J. Date: 10-04-2008. MVB.