2 W.P. (Cl N0. 959 of 2010 Mr. Patel submits that the entire amount of house loan taken by the petitioner has already been deposited by the petitioner by paying regular installments till 06.08.2002. Even after that the bank is deducting Rs. 2,000/— per month from the salary of the petitioner. He submits that in this regard, the petitioner has made a representation dated 27.08.09 (Annexure-P—3), but no decision has been taken till date. Therefore, the petitioner has filed this writ petition for a direction to respondent no. 1 to decide the representation dated 27.08.09 (Annexure~P-3) and he is praying that a time bound direction may be given to respondent No.1 to decide the said representation. Mr. Patel submits that this writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to dispose of the representation dated 27.08.09 (Annexure-P- 3), filed by the petitioner within the stipulated period granted by this Court. The above prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by learned counsel for the respondents. ’ Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that if the representation filed by the petitioner on 27.08.09 (Annexure-P-3) has not been disposed of till date, the same shall be disposed of within a period of one month from the date of filing of the certified copy of this order before respondent No.1. With the above observation/directions, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. There shall be no order as to cost. Sd/- uNIL W S“ Judge «Ki r A Rahul \\ s