1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.07.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN W.P.(MD).Nos.7277 & 7278 of 2011 And M.P.(MD).Nos. 1 & 1 of 2011 V.Masilamani ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD).No. 7277/2011 K.Krishnankutty ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD).No. 7278/2011 Vs The District Forest Officer Kanyakumari Division Nagercoil ... Respondent in both the Writ Petitions PRAYER IN W.P.(MD).No. 7277/2011: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the respondent relating to the order in S.O.No. 44 of 2011 (C.No. E2/4264/2011), dated 02.05.2011, to quash the same and to issue consequential directions to the respondent to reinstate the petitioner as Forest Guard with consequential benefits. PRAYER IN W.P.(MD).No. 7278/2011: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the respondent relating to the order in S.O.No. 45 of 2011 (C.No. E2/4264/2011), dated 02.05.2011, to quash the same and to issue consequential directions to the respondent to reinstate the petitioner as Forest Guard with consequential benefits. For Petitioners in both the Writ Petitions : Mr.M.Ravi For Respondent in both the Writ Petitions : Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen Additional Government Pleader C O M M O N O R D E R Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the respondent in both the Writ Petitions. By consent, these Writ Petitions are taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in both the Writ Petitions and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent in both the Writ Petitions. 3. The petitioners have come up with these present Writ Petitions challenging the order of suspension. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4. However, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners state that the petitioners could be directed to submit a representation to revoke the order of suspension to the respondent and the respondent may be directed to consider the same. 5. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the petitioners to send a detailed representation to the respondent, to revoke the order of suspension, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on receipt of the same, the respondent is directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks thereafter. 6. These Writ Petitions stand disposed of in the above terms. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (Accounts) /True copy/ Assistant Registrar To The District Forest Officer, Kanyakumari Division, Nagercoil. +1CC TO THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SR.21496 Vsg SR : 11.07.2011 : 2p/3c W.P.(MD).Nos.7277 & 7278 of 2011 And M.P.(MD).Nos. 1 & 1 of 2011 01.07.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/