IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3075, 3076 & 3247 of 2000 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- MAYURI K SHAH Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR NIKHIL KARIEL for TANNA ASSOCIATES for Petitioner MS MANISHA SHAH A.G.P. for Respondent No. 1,2 RULE SERVED BY DS for Respondent No. 1,2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI Date of decision: 16/12/2004 ORAL COMMON JUDGEMENT 1. The petitioners have by way of this petition challenged the impugned order dated 10th April, 2000 passed by the respondent authorities. 2. Mr. Nikhil Kariel learned appearing for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are already appointed through regular G.P.S.C. selection and, therefore, the petition has become infructuous. 3. In view of the aforesaid statement. the petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Interim relief if any, stands vacated. Liberty to apply in case of difficulty. [K.S. JHAVERI, J.] /phalguni/