1 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4753/2008 Shanti Lal Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. Date of Order :: 13.8.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. C.S. Rajpurohit, for the petitioner. ... The Zila Parishad (Rural Development Cell), Nagaur prepared a list as per the merit relating to the candidates, candidature of whom was considered for the purpose of appointment as Gram Rozgar Sahayak. In the list aforesaid name of the petitioner was shown at S.No.1 and the respondent No.5 was placed at S.No.4. After considering a complaint made by respondent No.5, the Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Nagaur and nominee of the Collector, Nagaur i.e. Additional Collector, Deedwana by the order dated 15.5.2008 cancelled appointment of the petitioner and ordered to employ the respondent No.5 as Gram Rozgar Sahayak. A challenge to the order dated 15.5.2008 is given by the petitioner on the count that there was no reason to cancel his appointment and to provide employment to the respondent No.5. From perusal of the order impugned dated 15.5.2008 it is apparent that at the first instance while considering candidature of respondent No.5, 20 marks being a member of Below Poverty Line Category (BPL) were not included in the merit marks relating to 2 respondent No.5. On adding the same the respondent No.5 stood at S.No.1 in the list of selected incumbents as per the merit, and therefore, a decision was taken to employ him as Gram Rozgar Sahayak. From perusal of the order impugned it is also clear that the respondent No.5 was at S.No. 292 in the survey report No.7088167 relating to the BPL families. In view of the fact that on adding the marks allocated to BPL families the respondent No.5 stood at S.No.1 in the list of selected candidates no wrong is committed by the respondents while providing employment, as such, I do not find any merit in this petition for writ. The same, therefore, is dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR), J. Jgoyal '