IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. O.C.P. No. 18 of 1993 DATE OF DECISION : 24.01.2011 Satnam Singh .... PETITIONER Versus Raj Kumar ..... RESPONDENT CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: None. * * * ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. (Oral) This contempt petition has been filed stating that the petitioner entered into an agreement to purchase land. On account of this, he and other members of his family were falsely implicated by the respondent in a case under Section 307 IPC, registered on 19.5.1990. Another FIR was registered on 1.4.1993 for alleged theft. A report was submitted by the rspondent to the Additional Sessions Judge, Kurukshetra, which did not furnish the correct particulars, which amounts to contempt. Notice was issued on 12.11.1993 and a reply was filed by the respondent, denying the allegations and he also tendered unqualified apology. The reply shows that 15 cases were registered. Though in the circumstances, possibility of the false cases having been registered is not ruled out, it is not known as to what was fate Crl. O.C.P. No. 18 of 1993 -2- of the said cases. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and the period, which has gone by and also that no body is present for the petitioner to pursue the matter and that unqualified apology has been tendered, we are of the view that the matter may be closed at this stage, without prejudice to any other remedy of the petitioner in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly. The petition is disposed of. ( ADARSH KUMAR GOEL ) JUDGE January 24, 2011 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) ndj JUDGE