IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18711 of 2010 RAM PRAVESH MAHTO SON OF LATE SARYUG MAHTO RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PITSUNJIYA P.S. BHADRA, DISTRICT PATNA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 03. 07.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The application for grant of anticipatory bail was earlier rejected by order dated 10th of December 2008. It is submitted that there is no specific allegation against this petitioner of firing causing death of the son of the informant. It is further submitted that similarly situated co-accused has been allowed bail by order dated 03.12.2007 as contained in Annexure-7. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner stating therein that the petitioner is suffering from disease for which he is taking treatment in the hospital and is aged about 70 years. Learned counsel for the State in not in a position to refute the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within 2 a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Ist class, Barh, Patna in connection with Complaint Case No. 303 ( c ) of 2004 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)