WPMS No. 1751 of 2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Shri Sharad Sharma, Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Kovid Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for the respondents. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, this court is of the opinion that the lower appellate court was justified in rejecting the appeal on the ground of non- maintainability against the issuance of notice under Order 39 Rule 2 of the C.P.C. Consequently, the lower appellate court was justified in rejecting the appeal. This court does not find any error in the impugned order since the injunction application is required to be adjudicated by the trial court. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. The court directs the trial court to decide the injunction application within four weeks from today. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 07.10.2010 Shiv