1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APPLICATION NO.1593 OF 2008 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.748 OF 2008 M/s.Akansha Consultancy Services Ltd. ..Applicants. V/s. Amson Plastic Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.Sachin Mhatre i/b. Rohit Shetty for applicants. Mr.Bharat Rathod for respondent. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J A.M.KHANWILKAR,J A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE DATE DATE : DECEMBER 11, 2008. : DECEMBER 11, 2008. : DECEMBER 11, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. Although the explanation offered in the affidavit in support of this Application is not sufficient cause, by way of indulgence, this Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) on condition that the advocate on record for the Applicants shall personally pay cost quantified at Rs.3,000/- to the High Court Legal Services Committee within one week from today, as condition precedent for showing this indulgence. 2. I am inclined to impose this cost as the explanation offered in the affidavit in support is unacceptable. This is so because parties were put to notice that the matter will appear on 12th November, 2 2008, as stated in the Order dated 16th October, 2008. The Applicants are relying on documents at page 8 and 10 of the paper book to contend that board of the Company Judge was not notified on the website. That is no explanation at all. The Advocates were expected to follow the board notified by the High Court. It is not the case of the Applicants that board of the Company Judge for 12th November, 2008 was not notified by the Registry or the Bar Association. Thus understood, explanation does not take the matter any further. Accordingly, this Application is made absolute on the above terms. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J)