HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL No. 1091 OF 2009 Dated: 19-10-2009 Between: N. Narasimhulu ... APPELLANT AND Southern Power Distribution Company of A.P., Ltd., Corporate Office, Tirupathi, rep., by its Chairman & Managing Director and another ... RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO. 1091 OF 2009 JUDGEMENT: (per C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy, J) This appeal has been filed against order dated 07-08-2009 in WPMP No. 21419 of 2009 in Writ Petition No. 16321 of 2009, whereby the learned single Judge directed that status quo as on the date of passing of the order shall be maintained with regard to the order dated 06-08-2009. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. The appellant who was working as a Divisional Engineer (Electrical) was promoted as Superintending Engineer on temporary basis. Later, by order dated 06-08-009, he was reverted as Divisional Engineer and in his place, respondent No.2 was promoted as Superintending Engineer. Questioning the said order, the appellant filed Writ Petition No. 16321 of 2009. In WPMP No. 21419 of 2009, the learned single Judge passed the order which was referred to above. As the appellant was already replaced by respondent No.2, the appellant felt aggrieved by the above mentioned order of the learned single Judge and filed the present writ appeal. Respondent No.2 also filed Writ Petition No. 19677 of 2009 for a mandamus questioning proceedings dated 09-09-2009 reverting him from the post of Superintending Engineer to the post of Divisional Engineer and restoring the appellant to the post of Superintending Engineer. Today, Sri S. Ramachandra Rao, learned Senior Counsel appearing for respondent No.2 made a request for withdrawal of the said writ petition. Accordingly, we dismissed the said writ petition. Inasmuch as in view of the interim order granted in this writ appeal the appellant was re-appointed as Superintending Engineer and has been presently working as General Manager/Projects, the grievance of the appellant stands redressed by the subsequent events. At the hearing, the learned Standing Counsel for respondent No. 1 submitted that the appellant has been working as General Manager/Projects and that he will be continued as such pending the writ petition. The statement of the learned Standing Counsel is placed on record and the writ appeal is accordingly disposed of. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 19-10-2009 ks