1 S.B.Civil Misc. Contempt Petition No.49/2007 (Smt. Sohani Devi vs. Amar Singh Rathore & Anr.) Date of order : April 09, 2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Pushpendra Singh, for the petitioner. Mr.S.K.Vyas, G.A. Heard learned counsel for the parties. A reply to the contempt petition has been filed by the respondents stating therein vide Annexure-R-2 that petitioner Sohani Devi is working for 3-4 hours in a day and not for full day i.e. 8 hours in a day. This Court directed the respondents to examine from their record as to whether the petitioner is working as part time for few hours in a day or her services are being utilized by the respondents as Safai Karmchari for 8 hours in a day. If the services of the petitioner are being utilized for full day i.e. 8 hours, in that event, the respondents shall pay the petitioner the minimum wages as sanctioned by the State. Since the respondents have filed the reply supported by an affidavit of respondent No.2 stating therein vide Annexure-R-2 that petitioner Sohani Devi is working for 3-4 hours in a day and not for full day i.e. 8 hours in a day and, therefore, the question 2 of minimum wages would not arise. In this view of the matter, there is no deliberate or willful disobedience of the order of this Court. The contempt petition is disposed of. Notices are discharged. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-