IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14966 of 2011 Raj Kumar, S/O Sheodat Rai, R/O Vill.- Panapur, P.S. and Prakhand- Daanpur, Distt.- Patna. . . . . . . Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Collector, Patna. 3. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Patna. 4. Prakhand Vikash Padadhikari(B.D.O.), Danapur, Distt.- Patna. 5. Programme Officer Danapur, Prakhand and P.S.- Danapur, Distt.- Patna. 6. Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat, Purani Panapur, P.S. and Prakhand Danapur, Distt.- Patna. . . . . . Respondents. ----------- 2/ 20.09.2011 The petitioner, who is a P.D.S. dealer within Danapur Block in the district of Patna prays for quashing the memo dated 29.07.2011 issued by the Deputy Development Commissioner, Patna, whereby he has been directed to refund Rs. 3,82,175/- towards the value of undistributed rice to the tune of 278.96 quintals under 50 % and 30 % of Sampurna Gramin Rojgar Yojana in between the years 2004-2005 at APL rate of Rs.13.70 per Kg. The petitioner submits that he has already deposited Rs. 5,000/-. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 including interim protection as mentioned therein, with the condition that the petitioner would either deposit 20% of the value of undistributed rice at Rs.10 per Kg. or the rice itself, if already not deposited within six weeks months. 2 This order would not come in the way of petitioner, if he wants to deposit the value of rice or rice itself in excess of 20%. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)