IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19884 of 2008 ROHIT KUMAR & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 07.07.2008 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The robbery of 50,000/- was committed and immediately on chase by the villagers the petitioner Rohit Kumar and others were apprehended. From the possession of the petitioners the entire amount was recovered. Submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioners is that the petitioners are of fair antecedent. They have been assaulted by the villagers and handed over to the police and the case comes at best under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code not under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioners have been arrested immediately after the occurrence. Considering this, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly their prayer for bail is rejected. However petitioners may renew their prayer for bail in the Court below after completing one year in custody. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)