IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17524 of 2010 RAJENDRA NARAYAN CHOUDHARY, S/O LATE SURAJ NARAYAN CHOUDHARY, RESIDENT OF BARETA HOUSE, NEAR JAIN ATITHI BHAWAN BINODPUR, DISTRICT- KATIHAR, SUPERANNUATED EMPLOYEE AS UNIVERSITY PROFESSOR FROM DARSHAN SAH COLLEGE, KATIHAR . Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, MADHEPURA. 4. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, L.N. MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA. 5. THE REGISTRAR, B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, MADHEPURA. 6. THE REGISTRAR, L.N. MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA. 7. THE FINANCE OFFICER, B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, MADHEPURA. 8. THE FINANCE OFFICER, L.N. MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA. 9. THE PRINCIPAL, DARSHAN SAH COLLEGE, KATIHAR. ----------- 2 25.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, respondent University as also the State. The grievances of the petitioner is that although he is receiving the pension but a larger amount on account of arrears of pension and gratuity and other dues as highlighted in paragraph 7 of the writ application has remained to be settled and paid by the University. According to the petitioner the total amount payable to the petitioner comes to Rs. 20,56,147/- and against this petitioner has received a sum of Rs.11,29,668/- the balance amount of Rs. 9,26,479/- has remained to be 2 paid. Learned counsel for the University submits that the claims of the petitioner as indicated in paragraph- 2 are not clear with regard to the balance dues. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal with regard to the payment of balance dues, petitioner proposes to file a separate representations before the respondent nos. 5 and 6 for the respective claims stating distinctly the balance dues as also copy of the relevant documents if any in support of the claims along with the certified copy of the present order. In case, such representations are filed with a copy to the Finance Officer of the concerned University within a period of four weeks, the claim of the petitioner be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner be settled at the earliest to enable the petitioner to receive the balance dues, if any, with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Amrendra/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)