IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.719 of 2007 MD.NAYEEMUDDIN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3. 7.7.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Conviction of Opposite Parties 2 to 4 under Sections 419 and 468 I.P.C. has been reversed by the appellate court on the ground that the trial court was not competent to record a finding that Most. Sakli was the wife of Sk. Hiru and committed the offences alleged when she executed the two gift deeds as wife of Manowar Ali. I do not see any illegality in the impugned judgment of the appellate court and this Criminal Revision application is, accordingly dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach civil court for recording the finding that Most. Sakli was the wife of Sk. Hiru. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J)