IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7467 of 2007 ARBIND KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the Petitioner : M/s.Dhanendra Chaubey, Milind Kr. Mishra, Advocates For the State : Mr. S.Rahman, AC to GA-IV …………… 3 07.03.2011 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permissions to withdraw this writ application to file an appeal before the appellate authority constituted under Rule 18 of the Bihar Panchayat Parambhik Shikshak (Niyojan Avam Seva Sart) Niyamavali, 2006 (as amended by Amendment Rules, 2008). Learned counsel for the State raises no objection with regard to the same. However, it is submitted on behalf of the State that first representation was filed by the petitioner on 1.11.2006 as contained in Annexure-6 to the writ application, whereas the 2006 Rules have come into existence on 25th of July 2006, thus, this writ application has been filed without availing the alternative remedy. No one appears on behalf of respondent Nos. 7 to 10. 2 As a result, this writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted to the petitioner. If such appeal is filed by the petitioner within eight weeks from today, then the appellate tribunal should consider the same on its own merit and in accordance with law and dispose of the same within the time prescribed under the Rules. It is made clear that this court has not formed or expressed any opinion with regard to the merit of the parties. Sanjay-II ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)