1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.07.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.(MD)No.8226 of 2011 & M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011 P.Udayappan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai. 2.Rajasekar, The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Prevention of Land Grabbing Special Cell, Pudukkottai. 3.The Inspector of Police, Prevention of Land Grabbing Special Cell, Pudukkottai. 4.M.Elango 5.R.S.Parthiban ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents 2 and 3 from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property comprised in S.F.No.193/4 Punjai 52 cents, and S.F.No.193/5 Punjai 10 cents under the guise of enquiry in the petition lodged by the respondents 5 and 4 with the third respondent. For Petitioner ... Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian For Respondents ... Mr.M.Govindan Special Govt. Pleader for R1 to R3 ORDER The petitioner has come up with the present writ petition to forbear the respondents 2 and 3 from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property comprised in S.F.No.193/4 Punjai 52 cents, and S.F.No.193/5 Punjai 10 cents under the guise of enquiry in the petition lodged by the respondents 5 and 4 with the third respondent. 2. Heard, Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader who takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3.By consent of both the parties, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. The petitioner's grievance is that the respondents 2 and 3 are trying to interfere with the possession of the petitioner's property at the behest of the respondents 4 and 5. The petitioner states that there is a civil suit pending in O.S.No.188 of 2011 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Pudukkottai and he has an order of injunction against the respondents 4 and 5. However, a copy of the order has not been produced before this Court. On the contrary, the petitioner produced a copy of the order passed by the Principal District Court in Criminal M.P.No.1495 of 2011 in order dated 19.07.2011 wherein anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner on certain conditions. From the statement as above, it is evident that the petitioner is protected by order of the civil Court as well as the competent Sessions Court in Crl.M.P. No.1495 of 2011. 5.In such as view of the matter, this Court is of the view that no further direction can be issued to the respondents 2 and 3 as sought for in the petition. No case is made out that the respondents are interfering with the petitioner's possession. However, the petitioner is at liberty to pursue this matter in the forum which has granted orders as above. 6. With the above observation, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (P&A) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To: 1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Prevention of Land Grabbing Special Cell, Pudukkottai. 3.The Inspector of Police, Prevention of Land Grabbing Special Cell, Pudukkottai. +1cc to The Special Government Pleader Sr.No.24597 gsr/ssl akm/04.08.11 /2p-5c/ W.P.(MD)No.8226 of 2011 25.07.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/