1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 57 OF 2008 Rajaram Kondiram Gaikwad and others ....Petitioners. Versus Bhika Rajaram Paikade and others ....Respondents. Shri. B.R. Surawase, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri. K.S. Patil, A.G.P. for the respondent/State. CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 7th December, 2009 PER COURT : 1. This Court had passed an order on 20.7.2007, granting ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause "C" in Writ Petition No. 965/2005 filed by the present petitioner. By virtue of prayer clause "C", the petitioner had prayed for stay to the execution and operation of the judgment and order dated 6.9.2004, passed by the Deputy Collector, which was confirmed in appeal by the Deputy Commissioner, Aurangbad by his order dated 24th of October 2005. Thus, the interim order of stay to these 2 orders was operating since 20.7.2007. It was alleged that in violation of the said order, the Tahsildar has carried out the mutation entries. 2. In response to notice issued to the contempt, the respondent No. 7 has filed an affidavit, in which she has stated that the mutation entries Nos. 9698, 9899, 9900 were effected on 20.2.2006, 17.4.2006 and 2.2.2006 as per the orders which were impugned in the present writ petition. It is the stand taken by the respondent in the affidavit that by the time, the interim order was granted by this Court on 20.7.2007 the entires were already sanctioned. There are no changes in the record after 20.7.2007. 3. In view of the aforesaid position, there is no substance in the present contempt petition, the same is dismissed. [ R.K. DESHPANDE, J. ] ssc/cp57.08