S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 9732/2008 Suresh Chandra Paliwal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :: 8.12.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr Ramesh Purohit, for the petitioner/s. Mr Shyam Toshniwal, for the respondents. ... Issue notice to the respondents as to why this petition for writ be not admitted. Under the instructions of the Court Sh. Shyam Toshniwal accepts the notice on behalf of the respondents, as such, service is sufficient. The controversy involved in this petition for writ is no more res integra in view of the judgment of this Court in the case of Smt. Vishnu Kunwar Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. dated 21.11.2008. As such the petition for writ is allowed. The respondents are directed to consider candidature of the petitioner for the purpose of appointment of Prabodhak ignoring break in service due to sanctioned leave availed by him. If the petitioner stands in merit, the respondents shall accord appointment to him, if he is otherwise eligible. It shall be open for the respondents to call the original documents from the petitioner or from the authority competent while examining candidature of the petitioner in the terms above. (GOVIND MATHUR), J. Jgoyal '