1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.3143/2011 (Nilesh N. Dangre .vs. Sr. Regional Manager, Nagpur LPG RO Nagpur and ors ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATED : JULY 06, 2011 Heard Advocate Shri Kubde with Advocate Shri Gautam for petitioner. The respondents no.1 to 3 have found petitioner not eligible for consideration as sale deed produced by him is only notarized. The learned counsel states that in application filed by the petitioner, it was mentioned that sale deed has been registered on 26.4.2010. By placing reliance upon Division Bench judgment of Patna High Court reported in AIR 1998 Patna 141 – Kameshwar Choudhary .vs. State of Bihar, the learned counsel states that after registration title passes from the date of execution and as here the sale deed is executed on 26.4.2010, the title would pass to petitioner from that date. Our attention is invited to affidavit of vendor of the petitioner to show that said vendor has received entire consideration and also to notarized sale deed. During the hearing we found that though 2 vendor has received entire sale consideration and the document of sale has been notarized, till date the sale deed has not been executed. As the petitioner did not give correct information to respondents no.1 to 3, we do not find anything wrong with their action. Petition rejected. JUDGE JUDGE halwai