THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO.192 OF 2010 16th April 2010. Between: A.V.RAMANAIAH .. APPELLANT AND THE GOVT. OF A.P., DEPARTMENT OF MINES & GEOLOGY, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD AND OTHERS .. RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO.192 OF 2010 O R D E R: (Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Nisar Ahmad Kakru) The bid by the 4th respondent herein for grant of leasehold rights of Illuru Sand Reach, Thotlavallur Mandal, Krishna District having not been accepted, consequently a writ petition along with an application for interim relief, which begot an order of status-quo. Being aggrieved, vacate petition was filed by the appellant, 4th respondent in the writ petition as also by the Government, which came to be disposed of by an order dated 17-3-2010, which is extracted for facility of reference: “ These applications are filed to vacate interim order dated 11.2.2009, in WPMP.No.3221 of 2009 in Writ Petition No.2528 of 2009. At the hearing, it is not disputed by the learned counsel for the parties that the period for which the impugned notification has been issued will be expiring by 31-3- 2010. In view of the same, interim order dated 11.2.2009 is modified by giving liberty to respondents 1 to 3 to hold fresh auction by following due procedure. The WVMPs and WPMP are accordingly disposed of.” Perusal of the order makes it manifest that the writ court refused an order to the advantage of the appellant inter alia for the reason that the impugned notification was going to live its life on 31.3.2010 and fact of the matter is that we are ahead of the said date when this appeal has come up for consideration. In view of the efflux of time the interim order of the learned single Judge is most apposite, therefore, we could not persuade ourselves even to put the respondents on notice. Dismissed. At this stage, the learned counsel for the appellant sought hearing of the writ petition immediately after ensuing vacation. Be listed as prayed for. Needless to say that the rights of the appellant as also of other parties shall have to abide by the outcome of the lis. SANJAY KUMAR, J. NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, C.J. 16TH April, 2010. Nagesh Babu THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO.192 of 2010 O R D E R: (Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Nisar Ahmad Kakru) 16th April 2010.