IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4447 of 2009 RAM JANAM PRASAD , Son of Late Baldeo Mahto Resident of Village Laura, PO Chandaut Dogara, PS Amba, District – Aurangabad 2. Rakesh Kumar Sinha @ Rakesh Kumar Sinha (II) Son of Late Brij Nandan Prasad Resident of Mohalla Sri Krishna Nagtar (Ahari), PO, PS & District Aurangabad 3. Ramakant Singh @ Ramakant Kumar Singh Son of Late Satya Narayan Singh Resident of Village Kharundha, PO Chandragarh, PS Nabinagar District Aurangabad 4. Munna Kumar Singh @ Jitendra Kumar Son of Sri Nageshwar Prasad Resident of Village Sri Krishna Nagar (Ahari), PO, PS & District Aurangabad 5. Udai Shankar Prasad, Son of Late Awadesh Prasad Resident of Village Sri Krishna Nagar (Ahari), PO, PS & District Aurangabad 6. Dulichand Ram, Son of Late Lalan Ram Resident of PO & PS Aurangabad (Tikari Paithan Tola), District Aurangabad ………. Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Chief Secretary Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2. The Secretary, Board of Revenue, Bihar, Patna 3. The Divisional Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya 4. The District Magistrate, Aurangabad….. Respondents ----------- 02- 10.4.2009 Heard Ms. Asha Verma for the petitioners, and Mr. Prasun Sinha, learned Government Advocate No. III. The petitioners claim to be the intending applicants for appointment to class IV posts in the Collectorate of District Aurangabad. The writ petition has been preferred for a direction to the District Magistrate to issue the advertisement and complete the selection process. It appears that other persons had moved this Court for identical cause by preferring CWJC No. 6640 of 2007 (Rakesh Kumar Singh & ors. v. State of Bihar & ors.), which was disposed of by order dated 2.12.2008 (Annexure 9), - 2 - and direction was issued to the District Magistrate, Aurangabad, to take appropriate steps in accordance with law. Furthermore, CWJC No.2495 of 2009 was preferred for identical cause which was disposed of with an identical direction on 24.2.2009 (Annexure 10). I see no justification for the third writ petition for identical cause. All the intending applicants can respond to the same advertisement. No further order is needed. 2. The writ petition is disposed of. ( S K Katriar ) mrl