IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. F.A.O No.4218 of 2009 Date of Decision: 24.08.2009 State of Haryana & others ....Appellants Versus Bharat Bhushan, Govt. Contractor ...Respondent CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Navneet Singh, A.A.G., Haryana for the appellants-State. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is an appeal against the Order dated 03-06-2009 passed by Additional District Judge, Jind, vide which, the application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, was partly allowed to the extent that award dated 30-12-2002 qua claim No.1 was set aside and the remaining extent of the award was upheld. Learned counsel for the appellants states that claim No.1 has been wrongly set aside. After hearing learned counsel for the appellant, I do not find any merit as with respect to claim No.1, only an award of Rs.5,000/- was awarded. The appellants are only aggrieved with the order which has set aside this part of the award. The amount is too meager and the State, in F.A.O No.4218 of 2009 -2- fact should not have filed an appeal, where the amount involved is only Rs.5,000/-. Even otherwise, on merits, no case has been made for interference in the well reasoned order of the Additional District Judge, Jind, partly allowing the application against the award. Dismissed. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 24.08.2009 JUDGE gurpreet