IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.6391/2010 Decided on:13.4.2011 _____________________________________________ Smt. Man Maya. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Naveen K. Bhadwaj, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Asstt. A.G. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that her services have been terminated by the respondents. However, it has come in the reply filed by the respondents that the petitioner is still working and her services have been regularized on 21.8.2010. 2. In view of this development, the present petition is closed. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 13.4.2011 *awasthi* 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?