Criminal Revision No.357 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.357 of 2011 Date of decision:- 11.2.2011 Raghbir Singh ...Petitioner Versus Sohan Lal and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. RITU BAHRI J.(Oral) this criminal revision is against the order dated 18.12.2010, passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karnal while dismissing the application under Section 319 Cr.P.C., filed by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has challenged the order on the ground that the application has been dismissed on two grounds; first, on the ground that there are general allegations of inflicting injuries on the petitioner; and second, on the statement of complainant. No sufficient evidence adduced involving of accused Sohan Lal. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that challan has been presented against the co-accused, against whom, there was a statement that they had inflicted injuries on the petitioner. Allegations against the summoned accused are similar to one Sohan Lal. In the investigating report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. Sohan Lal was found innocent. To summon the accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C. it will be necessary that there may be sufficient evidence produced, which in the opinion Criminal Revision No.357 of 2011 -2- of the Court is sufficient to convict the accused for the offence committed as held in Michael Machado and another versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another 2000(2) RCR (Criminal) 75 and Sarabjit Singh and another versus State of Punjab and another 2009(3) RCR (Criminal) 388. There is no infirmity in the order passed by the trial Court. Hence, the present criminal revision is dismissed. February 11, 2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Vijay Asija JUDGE