pvr 1 AP404-08 IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.404 OF 2008 Union of India. ...Petitioner vs. M/s.Shyam Constructions. ...Respondent --- Mr.T.J.Pandian, for Petitioner. Mr.Shilpa Kapil, for Respondent. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. DATED: 10th March,2011 P.C.: 1. Heard. The Award is attacked on two grounds viz. (i) Awarding interest and (ii) Awarding an amount for delay. But there is no ground raised in the petition that in the written statement those contentions were raised and though they were argued before the Arbitrator, they were not decided by the Arbitrator. In the absence of the contention being raised, that those grounds were raised in the written pvr 2 AP404-08 statement and thereafter they were argued before the Arbitrator, the Arbitrator did not decide those grounds, the award cannot be interfered with. The Petition is, therefore, rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J.)