THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.734 of 2010 JUDGMENT: The petitioners herein filed a suit in O.S.S.R.No.8257 of 2009 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Warangal, for declaration that the Ayacut certificate issued by respondent No.3 herein, vide proceedings in Rc.No.280/200 showing respondent No.4 as group leaders of User’s Committee under Reddy Kunta and submitted to the second defendant for contract work is illegal, void and has no legal existence in the eye of law. The Court below took an objection stating that the said suit is not maintainable and accordingly, by its docket order, dated 11.12.2009 refused to entertain the said suit. The same is questioned in this Civil Revision Petition. The impugned docket order reads as under: - “The present suit is filed for declaration that the Ayacut Certificate issued by third defendant/Tahsildar, Dharmasagar Mandal, Warangal District as illegal. Heard the counsel for the plaintiff. Perused the record. The issuance of certificate by the Tahsildar, Dharmasagar-defendant No.3 is purely on administrative aspects and it is an administrative order which cannot be interfered by the civil Court by way of declaration that the certificate issued by him is illegal. The civil Court has no jurisdiction to interfere in the administrative affairs of the Revenue authorities and there is no cause of action to entertain the present suit. Under the circumstances, I find that there is no cause of action to entertain the present suit and civil Court has no jurisdiction to question the administrative order issued by the revenue authorities. Hence, this suit is rejected.” Heard learned counsel appearing on either side. Having considered the submissions, this Court perused the relevant material papers on record. The said certificate is in the nature of an administrative order passed by the Tahsildar, Dharmasagar Mandal. It is not known as to how a suit for declaration of the said administrative order is maintainable. In fact, against such orders, the petitioners’ remedy is altogether a different, but not by instituting a suit of this nature. As such, the trial Court is perfectly justified in passing the impugned order and no interference is called for by this Court. In the result, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. ___________________________________ JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA 04th February 2011 DR