IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10530 of 2007 M/S ANJALI TRADERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 19/02/2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner after perusing the counter affidavit and on instruction submits that all other issues now have become infructuous except the fact that some security money deposited by the petitioner under various heads as reflected from page 18 of the writ application has not been refunded to him. In the counter affidavit there is a statement that one of the cheques deposited by the petitioner had bounced and some amount of security had to be utilized for adjustment of that amount but they are silent with regard to other heads. Let the petitioner make a claim with regard to the security amount which he is entitled for refund. The respondents will verify the amount and do the needful. This writ application is disposed of with the above observation. AMIN (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)