IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.W.P(T) No. 14519 of 2008 Date of decision: June 15, 2011 Arun Kumar Sood Petitioner Versus H.P. State Civil Supplied Corp. & others Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge For the Petitioner: Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate For the Respondents : Mrs. Bhawna Dutta, Advocate ___________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:- i) That the action of the respondents in effecting recovery on the basis of the letter, dated 17.12.2005 vide A-1 or such subsequent order of recovery, may kindly be quashed and set aside. ii) That the action of the respondents in effecting the recovery against the applicant in violation of rules, the law and by ignoring the facts as in Annexure A- 2, may kindly be quashed and set aside. 2. It is seen that the petitioner has submitted the factual and legal contentions in Annexure A-2. In view of the contention taken by the petitioner regarding jurisdiction with regard to power exercised by the second respondent, we are of the view that the matter should be considered by the first 2 respondent. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the first respondent to look into Annexure A-2, with an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of four months. Till orders, as above, are passed, interim order passed on 22nd September, 2006 will continue. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. ( Justice Kurian Joseph ), Chief Justice June 15, 2011 (K) ( Justice V.K. Sharma ), Judge