IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP (T) No.13739 of 2008 Date of decision : May 16, 2011 Neelam Kumari …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. R.P. Singh, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents-Stae. Mr. Mehar Chand, Advocate, vice Ms Archana Dutt, Advocate, for respondents No.4 zand 5. Surjit Singh, Judge(Oral) Heard and gone through the record. 2. Petitioner, who was a candidate for the post of Assistant Primary Teacher alongwith respondent No.5 Kiran Bala, has challenged the selection of respondent No.5 Kiran Bala, on the ground that sister of said Kiran Bala, who has been impleaded as respondent No.4, was one of the members of the Selection Committee, in her capacity as Pradhan of the Panchayat. 3. Original Record was summoned. It has been produced. Merit List is available in the record. It is not signed by respondent No.4 Urmila Devi, who was the Pradhan of the Panchayat. As a matter of fact, though respondent No.4 Urmila Devi was included in the Selection Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? …2… Committee, but she submitted a writing to the Chairman of the Selection Committee that her own sister being a candidate, she would not be participating in the interviews and some other person be taken as member of the Selection Committee. In view of the abovestated position, present writ petition is dismissed. May 16, 2011(sd) ( Surjit Singh ), J