WP(C) 6403/2003 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Mr. Surana, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Adhikari, learned State Counsel. None appears today for the respondents 3 and 4. It is submitted a t the Bar the Mr. B.N. Sharma, Advocate (since deceased) had earlier represented them. Mr. Surana has drawn the attention of this Court to a joint affidavit fi led on 6/7/2005 incorporating the terms of settlement vis-à-vis the dispute here in between the petitioners and respondent No. 4 represented by respondent No. 3. The learned Counsel has contended that both the parties have since acted on the terms and conditions of the settlement and that the controversy has since been resolved. In view of the above and in absence of any material to the contrary, thi s Court is of the view that no live issue survive for its further scrutiny. This petition is closed in the above terms. No costs.