HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Sin^le Bench; HonTale Mr. Justice Satish K. Agalhotei Wnt Petition No.2323 of2003 Petitioner i?' Versus 1. 4. Raajit Singh Thakiir, son of Shree Kislian, aged about 46 years, Upper Division Clerk, presently posted at C.G. Council of Science aiid Technology, Pandit Ravi Shaiikar Sbukla University Campiis, Raipur, District- Raipur, (C.G.j C.G. Council ofScieiice and Technology, through its Director Geneial, Pandit Ravi Shankar Shulda University Campus, Raipui', fChhattisgarh) M.P. CoiuicilofScience and Technology, through its Director General, Kisan Bhawaa, 26, Arera HiUs, Mofher Teressa Road, Bhopal, (M,P.) State of Chhattisgarh, through Secictarsr, Departinent of Science and Technology, D.K.S. Bufldiag, Mscatralay, Raipur, (C.G) State of Madbya Pradesh, through Secretary, Departtuent of Science and Technology, VaUabh Bhawan, Manti-e-lay, Bhopal, (M.P.) as» Shri B.D. Guru, counsel for fhe petitioner. Sliri Pankaj Shrivastava, panel lawyer for respondent No. 3. Shri Ainit Venna, counsel for respoiident No. 1. None for rcspondent No. 2 aad 4, ^^^B^^^'^^s^^^^^^ ORAL O R D ER - ( 7(h FeBriiary, 2006) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for petitioner subinits that petitioner, who is working on the post of Upper Division Clerk at C.G. Couucil of Science and Technology, Pandit Ravi Shaakar Shukla University Caiapus, is a penaanent resident pf Bhopal in the State of Madhya Pradesh. Thc petitioner has been aUocated to the State of ChhattisgaA ajid he waats his reallocation to the State of Madhya Pradesh. Leam.ed counsel for fhe petitioner, on iustruction, subniits that the petitioiier be greirited Ubeit^' to inake a icpresentation to fhe xespondents for redressal of his grievaaces, Leanied counsel appearing for fhe icspondents have no objection to the said subnaission. 2. In view ofthe foregouig, fhe petition stands disposed offinaUy, with libert5'- to fhe petitioner to inake an appi'opriate representation to flie i^spondents/authorities concemed, wittun a period of two weeks froin today, aud the fespondents/authorities arc directed to consider and decide fhe saiae, ia an objective xaanner, ia acconlan.ee with law, wifhin a period of eight weeks fi'oin fhe date of receipt of the icpicsentation, ifany. CertiGed copy, as per rules. ,___..-—-- - — - —-- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge