1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 2. WP/4839/2007 with CA No.13324/2010 (SHEETAL HASMUKH PARDESHI AND ANR V/S UKHA SAKRU VANJARI AND OTHERS) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr.R.R.Mantri, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr. G.D.Jain, Adv., h/f Mr.A.B.Girase, Adv., for R.1 &2. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:12/10/2010 1. Heard. The learned Judge, while rejecting the application on 29.6.2007 has indicated that the application moved by the writ petitioner is premature and, consequently, could not be considered at that stage. This observation of the learned Judge does not call for any interference. The contention of defendant No.2 ( petitioner) in terms of Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.Code was kept open, to be considered at final hearing. In this view of the matter, writ petition lacks merit, 2 rejected. Rule discharged. The learned Judge seized with the matter shall proceed expeditiously. Civil Application disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/4839-07wp