mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.794 OF 2009 Shiv Narayan Saxena Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & anr. Respondents Ishwar S. Badigannavar for petitioner. H.J.Dedhi, APP for State. M.R.Patel for respondent no.2. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 04th May 2009 PC : 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for second respondent. Learned counsel for the second respondent states on instructions that the petitioner has already handed over a demand draft representing the amount equivalent to double the cheque amount and therefore, the second respondent has no objection for quashing the complaint. 2. In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent, following order is passed :- (a) The proceedings of the complaint bearing C.C.No.35/SS/2006 is quashed and set aside. (A.S.OKA, J.)