IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST JUNE 2011 / 11TH JYAISHTA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 412 of 2011(S) -------------------------------------------- [ORDER IN D.B.A.R. NO.3/2004 DTD. 24/11/2010] .................... PETITIONER/ADDL.2ND RESPONDENT: -------------------------------------------------------- V.S.SURESH KUMAR, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O.LATE N.V.SAGAR, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER (RETIRED), TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, RESIDING AT KAMALALAYAM EITHUKUNDU KANI, NADOORKOLLA, AMARAVILA, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.GOPAKUMAR R.THALIYAL, SRI.P.R.PRATEESH. RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------------------- SMT.ANITHA, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), SECRETARY, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, NANTHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 004. BY ADV. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN, S.C, T.D.B. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/06/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ. ----------------------------------- Cont. Case (C).No.412 OF 2011 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 1st day of June, 2011 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan,J. Learned senior Government Pleader has placed before us copy of a communication dated 27.5.2011 issued by the Director, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Bureau to the Superintendent of Police (N/C), VACB, Special Investigation Unit-I, Trivandrum which says that further proceedings against V.S.Sureshkumar, the petitioner in this case, who was formerly Administrative Officer of Malayalappuzha Devaswom Temple, has been decided to be treated as “further action dropped”. This obviously means that nothing now stands in the way of the respondent secretary of the Devaswom Board from ensuring that the necessary papers are issued and NLC is drawn up and retiral benefits released to the petitioner accordingly. Let the needful action in that regard be taken COC.412/11 2 and payments due to the petitioner effected within a period of two months from now. It is so directed, failing which, the petitioner will be at liberty to apply for re-opening of this contempt of court proceedings. The case is ordered accordingly. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. Sd/- P. BHAVADASAN, Judge. kkb.2/6.