W.P5No.N Hé‘? 200% SB. r/Rajkumar Tiwari, years, R/o Mahamaya Road, Ratanpur, distt.~B1‘Iaspur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh , Through Secretary , Départmcnt Raipur (C.G.) j? @ G gwwv “g g; Penswnbada Director " of public Ralpur ’ InStruction (C . G) . , , a. ' m ‘a Education D.K.S. Bhawan WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2260F / THE ‘ CQ\_ umsn'wnou OF mom HIGH COURT Of CHHAT'HSGARH AT BEASPUR W. P. (5) No. 1164 of 200/ Peti'l'ioner- Rajkumnr- Tiwari Versus Respondems Sfafe of Chhu'tfisgnrh & another Simle Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sa'l‘ish K. Agnihvrri. Mr. Kumaresh Tiwari, Advocafe for the pefitioner. Sm't. Anju Ahuja, Depufy Govemmenf Advoca‘le for 1h: Sink/respondents. O R D E R (Passed on #his 28'“ Day of February, 2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing for +he petitioner submits *ha'r fhe pefifioner is working as Upper Division Teacher. The pefifioner obtained B. Ed. Examination certificate on 20.12.1996, on his own expenses. 2. Learned counsel appearing ,for the petitioner submits that the question involved, herein asto whether the teacher, who obtained Bo Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses is entitled to two advance increments. 3. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to two advance increments in view of the decision of this Court in the case of Voshwont Kumar Bharodwas Vs. Municipal Corporation, burg and onother_{2006 (E) MPJR-C6 96}. This Court in the cmr of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, burg and mother (Supra), came to the conclusion that the teachers, who had obtained B. Ed. IB.T.Ii Examination Certificate on their own expenses, are covered by 1h: circuiar du-ted 24.12.98 hsued by the 5mm Govemmen? of Madhya Pradzsh. Learned counsel for The pe'mioner- furrhct- submifsihaf fhe facts and quos'n‘on of low involved in 1h: presem‘ case are squarely covemd by decision of 1his Court in fl1e case of Yashwant Kumar Bhamdwoj Vs. Municipal Corpomfion. Durg and amine:- (Suprq), to which learned counsel oppeui ing for the respondents fairly concedes and agrees with the averment made by learned counsel appearing for the ' pe'l'i'l’ioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in t the case of Yoshwont Kunm- Bhomdwoj Vs. Municipal Corporation. burg ond another (Supra), wbject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B. Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 & 1.3.1999 and further whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. t [ Sdl- l l Satish K.Agnihotri II j Judge Subhosh r i