^—^~--^^ (S n i(°V c IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATISGARH) W,_P.N0.2 2^70F 2002 PETITIONER ^^ ..-SfS^ ^o<.'Y,.i^' \-\^' ^^^•'w <^7 ...•••' Dinesh Kumai' Sharma S/o Shri S.N.Sharma, Aged about 41 years, Presently working as Assistant Engineer in the Municipal Council Tahsil Bhatapara, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ?^ 6^^ VE RS U S RESPONDENTS ^y ;-e( '^ (4i-i^^ 1. The State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary,Deptt. of Urban Administration, Mantralaya, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). 2. Director(Urban Admi'stration) Chhattisgarh, Raipur. 3. Municipal Council, Chirimiri through its Chief Municipal Officer, Chirmiri, (CG) 4. Municipal Council Bhatapara thru' it?s Chief Municipal Officer, Tahsil Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G) 5. Sri Umesh Kumar Dhalendra Assistant Engineer, Muncipal Council, Dhamtari posted as Executive Engineer, Nagar Palika Nigam, Bhilai (CG) 6. Shri Vijay Khalko, Assistant Engineer, Municipal Corpn. Raipur posted as Executive Engineer, Engg.Cell, D'rate Bilaspur (CG) 7. Shri Bhagirathi Verma, Asstt.Engineer, Engg. Cell, D?rate,Raipur posted as Executive Engineer, Engg. Cell, D'rate,Raipur (C.G.) ISISi 8. Shri Rohit Kumar Sahu, Asstt.Engineer, Muncipal Corporation, Durg posted as Executive Engineer, Municipal Corporation, Rajnandgaon(CG) 9. Shri P. N. Sahu, Assistant Engineer Municipal Council, Raigarh posted as Executive Engineer, Nagar Palika Nigam, Durg (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS PROHIBinON AND OTHER SUITABLE^VRIT QR WRITS, DIRECTION QR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS: XI-HC-22 ^IT^T'^1 t^ri^'3^1 '^HT^'^1^^' ^- ^sr' l, w^^, hw^y. ^^ ^;f^p^.^^^.. ^ra^T^"iqi^>""*<'*<<<'*<'><*"*'<c*<^< Y'^i^ f^^T" ^TI^T ^T[[^R ^TT 03.05.2003 Shri Maauidra Shrivastavat Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, Py. Advocate General for fhe State. Heaixl. thfe petition against fhe iaaction )etitiouer's naine has not been The petitioner has filed of the respondents whereby the included m the Seniority L|ist of Assistaat Engiaeers mauitamed bv the State Goveroidei Counsel for the petitioner) rcprcscutations vidc Anncxurcs not at aU been considered. Agg4< has approached before fhis Cour^. Having considered tlie fa<| case aiid material on record, ia of justice will serve if a directio^ rnake a detaUed representation to the conipetent aufliority withiji on such representation beiag ithifci ^i^rt^NN ^n^ff ^ ft^t <^i^i< ^T 3:Ti^PT 3T?^T counsel for fhe Petitioner. ent. submitted fhat he has made /15 & 16 but thc sainc havc thercwitih., the petitioner :g4evcd ts aad cii'cuiastances of the ttie opiaion of this Court, ends is given to the petitioner to jlong with a copy of this onler fifteen days frora today aiid ^led fhe coiiipetent autliority ['^ft^^fii^ •^- XI-HC-22 ^n^r'^T fN^''3n^T ^Rt^^ni^ •^' ^ ij^^^ M^'<'\^''•€)'-} -y^ -^T2TR^, •^rtePTS, ^^l'y^ 3fl^T -^^ ^..^..'^^^^ 'fgr^sr" ^n^l ^aT^ ^Tft^T -2-- shall decide fhe sajiie by ^[assuig a x-easoned order ia a.ccordaiice with law within. t^o nionfhs frora the date of production of representation. aiid the petitioner fhereby feeJ petition afresh chaUenguig the fhis Court has not expressed a4y opmion on the merits ofthe case. disposed of. Consequently, M,W,P.No. writ aiid 7157 for urgcnt hcaringj '^pfe'4Nw^i ^ fecst <fa^.i< -^ ^TPw '3'n^i f aay adverse order is passed ls aggrieved, he may file the order. tt is inade clear tiiat sbid Wifhi tlie aforesaid obsefvations, fh.is petitioa staads J302/02 for graat ofad-mterim stand disposcd of< Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [Tft~^ ^R^4