& s HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH. BILASPKR W.P. (81 No. 6219 of 2007 PETITIONBR RESPONDBNTns 2 Suresh Kumar Kaniioje, S/o Shri Shatrufaad Lal, Age about 36 years, Asst. Teacher, Govt. Middle Scliool, Kpriya, Block - Saja, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) . . Versus State Govt. of Chliattisgarh, Through : The Secretaiy, Education & Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) District Edycation Officer, Bemetara, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) WRIT PBTITIONJJNDBRARTICLiB 226 OFTHB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearaace: Shri Sonikant Verma, couiisel fer the petitioner. Shi-i Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for fhe State on advance copy. (15.10.2007) SUmLKUJMAR.SIHHA.J Heard. Learaed coiuisel for fhe petitioner subinits that fhe issue iuvolved iii the case is as towheffaer the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. fhe date of initial appointment or from the date ofcompletion ofprobation period. He subniits fhatfhe issue involved herein was coiisidered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur m O.A. No.2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 ofhers Vs. State ofM.P. aad ofliers), wherein, it was held fhat fhe sinularly situated teachers are entifled to regular pay scale w.e.f. fhe date of iEiitial appoiiitment. The inatter was taken up to fhe Hon'ble Supreine Court iu Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.6892/93. The said petitionwas disinissed by the Hori'ble Supreine Court uphblding fhe decision of the Tribiuial to fhe effect fhat the gltf 1; -.;:..:—;.. 1^-teii^Sa^r; •"^^^"""•i—T W.P.(S)No.6219/2007 ^z- vatti Teachers/Assistaiit Teachers are entifled to regular pay scale fi~Qm the date 6f nutial appointaient. Leamed coiinsel for the petitioner furfher subinits fhat this Court, wlule CQnsidering the same issue in Ram KTMaar Sahu and others Vs. State Gtovt. of Chhatdsgarh aad anofher (W.P.(S).No.813 of 2007) by order dated 12.2.2007, Iias grsmted regular pay scale w.e.f. ttie date ofioitial appoiatnient. Leamed eounsel for the pardes joinfly subiaits fhat fhis case is squarely covered by fhe decision offhis Court ia ftie case of Rain Kuinar Sahu arid aaother (supra). In view offhat, tiiis petition is atlowed ia the same terms. However, Uiis order shall be subject to aU verifications inade by the State regardiag facts pleaded in fhe petition. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge '^.^ ijf^iil^—; '~-)rr-^"-?j