iH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER WRIT PETITION (0 No. 2065 of2(N)7 ALPANA TYAGI D/o Shri R-P.Tyagi, Aged about 35 years, R/o C/o Shri R.P.S. Tyagi, Forest Colony, Raja Talab.Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Chief Secretary, StateofC.G, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. The Public Service Commission - Through its Secretary, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Chairman, Public Service Commission, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA Preseat: Shri Adil Minhaz, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Vmay Harit, Deputy Advoeate General wifli Shri S.K-Mishra, Panel Lawyer forthe State/respondent No. 1. Shri Abliisfaek Sinha, Advocate for respondent No. 2 and 3. (Passed on 13th day of December, 2007) Learaed counsel appearina for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has appeared in Civil Services (Main) Examination held in the year 2005. The petitioner could not obtain the results. Bemg aggrieved, the petitioner has filed this petition seeking following rsliefs. (i) That the, Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for tlie entire recoi-ds peftainuig to the result of the petitioner mcludmg her answer-sheets and the mark- sheet relatiiig to tlie State Sen-'ice (Main) Examiiiation, 2005. (ii) That the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondeiits to release all the results which have been withheid by the respoadent commission. e» (iii) That this Hon'ble Court inay kindly be pleased to Ifae petitioner to appear in the interview which is to be conducted for State Services Examination 2005. (iv) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit andproper in the facts and circumstances ofthe case. The main relief is contained in para 7(ii). The results have been declared and a mark-sheet thereofhas been supplied to the petitioner. With regard to the prayer No. 7(iii), this prayer cannot be granted as the interview has already taken place in the year 2006 and the petitioner beiag unsuccessful, cannot be pemritted to appear in the inten'iew. Prayer No. 7(i) and (iv) are incidental prayers, no order is necessary. In view of the fbregoing, leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that nothing survives in this petition. Accordmgly, the petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge