Crl. Misc. No.M-30478 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-30478 of 2010 Date of Decision: 04.03.2011 Gurpreet Kaur and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Parveen Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G., Punjab for the respondent-State. Mr. Chanchal K. Singla, Advocate for respondents No.4 to 6. Mr. Arvind Rajotia, Advocate for respondent No.7. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for issuance of direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners by providing adequate security/police protection to the petitioners and also directing respondents No.4 to 7 not to interfere in the personal lives and liberty of the petitioners. Learned counsel for respondents No.4 to 6, as well as, learned counsel for respondent No.7 state that they have instructions to state that they have no objection to the marriage of the petitioners. As such, they Crl. Misc. No.M-30478 of 2010 2 need not to have any fear from them. In view of the above, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. Dismissed as such. However, in case, the petitioners still feel threatened at the hands of private respondents, they are at liberty to approach respondent No.2 i.e. Senior Superintendent of Police, Moga, who shall look into the threat perception and take necessary measures, if need be. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 04.03.2011 JUDGE gurpreet