1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2743 OF 2009 Sidhhram Anandappa Bidarkoti @ Patil and another ...Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2744 OF 2009 Sangita Shrishailya Kore & Anr. ...Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr.Ajay Joshi for the applicant Ms S.V.Gajare A.P.P for State CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : JULY 10, 2009 P.C. 1 Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned A.P.P for State. By the impugned order, anticipatory bail has been granted in favour of the applicants. The objection of the applicants to a part of the said order is that the anticipatory bail has been granted which will remain in force only for a period of one month from 25 th May 2009. Investigation is still in progress. 2 Considering the nature of allegations made against the applicants, anticipatory bail ought to have been granted till the charge sheet is filed. Hence, impugned orders need modification. 2 3 Hence, I pass the following order ; i) Impugned orders are modified and it is directed that the order granting anticipatory bail will operate to the benefit of the applicants till the charge sheet is filed with liberty to the applicants to apply for regular bail before the appropriate court. JUDGE