IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO.1063 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 02.07.2007 in W.P.NO.6014 OF 2007 on the ﬁle of the High Court.) Between: Mumtaz Educational and Welfare Society Parbhani Rep. by its President Prof. Hameedulla Khan, Parbhani District,. Maharashtra, Rep. by his SPA Mohd. IQbal Hussain S/o. Mohd. Murtuza Hussain, aged 43 yrs, R/o. Iqbal Nagar, Parbhani District, Parbhani, Maharashtra. ...APPELLANT AND 1 The Director, Maulana Azad National Urdu University Gachibowli, Hyderabad. 2 The Regional Director, Maulana Azad National Urdu University, Mumbai Regional Center, F1/6/2, 2nd Floor. 3 Kamela Urdu High School and Junior College, Rep. by its Principles, Kamel Campus, Yousufiya Colony. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: MR.MIRZASAFIULLA BAIG Counsel for the Respondents: MR.DEEPAK BHATTACHARJEE The Court delivered the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO.1063 of 2008 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Mr Justice B.Prakash Rao) Heard both the sides. At their request, the Writ Appeal itself is taken up for disposal. The appellant-unsuccessful petitioner seeks to assail the order dated 02.07.2007 in W.P.M.P.No.7689 of 2007 in W.P.No.6014 of 2007 rejecting the application ﬁled seeking stay of the proceedings dated 20.02.2007 issued by the ﬁrst respondent. Though several contentions sought to be urged on behalf of the appellant, learned Single Judge did not ﬁnd favour to grant the interim order and dismissed the application. Hence, the appeal. Having heard on either side and on perusal of the material available on record, we are of the opinion that the questions sought to be urged cannot be gone into at interlocutory stage and the order under appeal is purely discretionary. We do not ﬁnd any merits in the appeal. However, having regard to the fact that the matter pertains to Educational Institution and Study Center, oﬃce is directed to post the Writ Petition itself for “Final Hearing” subject to “Part Heard” before the regular Court hearing the matters on 20.10.2008. Subject to the above, the Writ Appeal is disposed of. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) ________________ (R.KANTHA RAO, J) 18th September 2008 RRB