fih^ ^^r HIGH COUKT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUft S»>; ^w. 2. 3. PETmONER RESPONDENTS ; 1. WMT PETmONCSVNo. 3384 of2008 SC/ST Employees Welfare Association of BSNL, Chhattis^rh Telecom Circle Raipur, C.G. Through ite Circle Secretary, Ashok Sin^i, S/o Shri Shiv Kumar, Aged absut 38 years, R/o Laxminagar, Ekta Chowk, Behind Marble Line, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS' •: UnionofIndiaThroughtheSecretary,Departmeiit of Commumcation Sanchar Bhawaitt, 20, Ashok RQad,NewDel}u,110Q01 Bharat Sanchar Nigam Liniited (Goyernment pf India Eriterprise) Through Chairman arid Managing Director, Corporate OfBee at Harishchaadra Matfaur Line, Janpafh, New Deftu 110001 Chief General Manager, Telecommunications, Bharat Sanchar Ni^m Limited, Ghhattisgarh TeleconiCirele, Raipur C.G. WRIT PETmONUNDER AR'I'ICKE 2256 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA SBiHon'lileShriSatlahK.Asnihotri.J. Present: Shri Ajay Slttivastava.AdvocatefiM-tiiepetitioner. ShnS.K.Beriwal, Standu^CounselfbrthelJnionefIiBlia. Shri R.M.Solapuricar, Advoeate fbrfhe respcmdeat'Nfo. 1 and 2. ORALORDER (Passed on G:2nd day of Ny, 2008) Leamed counsel appearing for tfae petitioner submits that the petitiorier does not want to contest the matter on merit, at this stage and prays fliat fte representations dated 03.12.2007, 17.12.2007 and 28.12.2007 (Annexure P/7) wtuch are pending consideration betoe the autUprities^ c decided wifhm a reasonable period, ia aecordance wtth law, on its own merit. - Leamedcounselappearingfortherespondentshavenoobjection. The respondent authorfties are diiected to consider and deeide the above- referred' representations in accordance with law, on its own merit, as expeditiously aspossible. i 4. In ^iew oftiw above, the petition stgnds disposed o£No order asto <»sts.^^'^ ftniiti Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge -.^ ! BS8gttlS)SKWBB :MMKa'yaaasiiiBHa ;a:aIKMUS8fiSI»1iil ®»RiS'KBiSifi893iS$a