IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN MONDAY, THE 2ND JUNE 2008 / 12TH JYAISHTA 1930 WA.No. 1118 of 2008() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENTIN WPC.698/2008 Dated 27/03/2008 .................... APPELLANT: APPELLANT/NOT PARTY: ------------------------------- RAMADAS K.S., S/O. SADANANAN, 11/649, KANAKKATTUSSERY HOUSE, CHERAI P.O., NORTH PARAVOOR. BY ADV. SRI.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS: ---------------------------------------- 1. K.S. SOMARAJ, AGED 30 YEARS, MANAGING PARTNER, M/S. JANAVEDI TRANSPORT CORPORATION, CHITTATTUKARA, VADAKKEKKARA, NORTH PARAVUR. 2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM. 4. THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM. R1 BY ADV. SRTI.P.GOPALAKRISHNA MENON R2 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.K.SANDESH RAJA. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J.B.Koshy & P.N.Ravindran, JJ. ===================== W.A.No.1118 of 2008 ===================== Dated this the 2nd day of June, 2008. JUDGMENT Koshy,J. This Writ Appeal is filed by the appellant contending that he was not heard and he is the affected party. In the Writ Petition, the learned single Judge directed the writ petitioner to file appropriate application regarding the departure time of his vehicle. In the circumstances of the case, if such an application is filed while disposing of the same, the appellant also should be heard. With the above observation, this Writ Appeal is disposed of. J.B.Koshy, Judge. P.N.Ravindran, Judge. ess 2/6