^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIIASPUR WRIT PETITION (S1l No. Ku. Nisha Bari D/o Late Shri LaIIan Prasad Bari, aged about 26 years, Resident of Village Padauli, Tahsil Wadra&agar, Distriot Surguja(C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Seeretai-y, Depaftnieiit of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Tlie Chief Conservator of Forest, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Conservator of Forest, Surguja Circle, Ambikapur, DK&iet Surguja (C.G.) 4. Tlie Divisional Forest Qfficer, East Forest Division, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) WREI^EimQN UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrTUTIQN OF INDIA SB: Hon'Ue Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Ganesh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri U.N.S.Deo, Govenimeiit Advoeate for the State / respondents. (Passed on 17U day of March, 2008) 1. With the conseiit of fhe parties, the matter is taken up for Iiearing ^ 3. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on mstructions, submite that the petitioner does aot want to press this petition oa merit. However, leamedcounsel submits that since the petitioner was assured by order dated 04.01.2002 (Annexure P/45'tfaat the case offhe petitioner would be considered for grant of compassionate appointment when fhe ban on appoiataaent.would be removed. In fhe light ofthe said circular, the petitioner seeks liberty offhis Courtto make a representationbefore fhe authorities concemed, which may be considered and decided in accordance wifh law, on its own merit, as expeditiously as possible, to which leamed couiisel appearing forfhe other side has no objection. It is ordered accordinglv. The petition is disposed of with the above stated directions. No order astoeosts. - Sd/- SatishKAgnihotri Judge