^G- \0~€f- ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fCG) WRIT PETITION (S) NQ w /2010 PETITIONER i,'o ''.. / >• ^^s^ ^^^ \^- RESPONDENTS 1.' 2. Smt. Prabha Ekka, aged about 48 years, W/o. Manuwel Ekka, occupation - ServiGe - Asst. Teacher, working as Hostel Superintendenf (Adhikshika) Govt Post Matric Giris Hostel, Patthalg;aon, Distt. Jashpur (CG) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretaiy, .Departraent of Tribal Welfare, Dau . Kalyan Singh Bhawaii, Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner, Deptt of Tribal 'Welfare, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 3. Principal, Government Boys Higher Secondary Schpdl, Patthalgaon Distt. Jashpur (CG) WRITPETITION U/A 226 OF THE eONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 7 HIGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARHlBILASPUR PETITJONER WRIT PETITION (S) N0.681 OF 2010 Smi. Prabha Ekka Versus State of Ghhattisgarh & (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india) Single Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- ShriA.N. Bhakta, counselforthe petitioner. Shri N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyer forthe State. ORDER(ORAU (Passed on this 15 day ofFebruary, 2010} 1) VVith the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the petltion is heard finally. 2) By this petition, the petitioner seeks a ciirection to respondents to pay two advance increments from the passing of B.Ed examination, on her own expenses, before entering into service. 3) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue invoived in the present case is no ionger res integra as the same has been considered and decided by the Supreme Court in Asha Saxena v. State ofM.P. & Ofs.' as weli as by thls Court in Vashwant Kumar Bharadwaj v. Municipa! Corpc-raSon, Durg and anothe^ and Gopesh Kumar Verma v. Ths Stats Govt. of ChhaiSsgarts andanothef^. !2009(iii)MPJR{SC559 22006(ll)MPJR-CG96 3WP(S)No.413Qof-2005 Gowri 4) Learned counsei further submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision as aforestated. Thus, the permitted to petitioner may be hls case in the ight of aforestated decisions, subject to verification of ths facts. 5) Learned counsel event, the petitioner makes a represent'ation, the same wiil be considered and decided.in accordance with law and as weil as this Gopesh Kumar from the date of receipt of the rep 6) in view of foregoing, accordin< io (supra) n yash'ffant Kumar Bharadwaj {suDra} and (supra), within a period of four weeks the learned counse! appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication; 7) Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge