IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11178 of 2011 Manoj Kumar, son of Sri Sunder Jha, resident of village Rajnagar, P.S. Rajnagar, District Madhubani……………………………………..….Petitioner. Versus 1. The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas, Government of India, New Delhi. 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas, Government of India, New Delhi. 3. The Dealer Selection Board, Patna IV through its Secretary, Abhay Bhawan, 3rd Floor, Frazer Road, Patna. 4. The Secretary Member, Dealer Selection Board, Abhay Bhawan, 3rd Floor, Frazer Road, Patna. 5. The State of Bihar through Collector, Madhubani. 6. The Collector, Madhubani, District Madhubani. 7. The Sub-Divisional Officer Sadar Madhubani, District Madhubani………………………………….Respondents. For the petitioner : Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Rajeev Lochan, AC to GA-9 For the Union of India : Mr. S. Kumar Sharma, Advocate. ---------------------------------- 03/ 17.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for directing the respondents concerned to consider the application and objection of the petitioner for allotment of Retail Oil Dealership of Indian Oil Corporation Limited at Videshwar in the district of Madhubani in accordance with law in pursuance of earlier advertisement or to re-advertise the same in the light of order dated 13.11.2009 passed in C.W.J.C. No.15419 of 2009 filed by the petitioner. 3. From a perusal of order dated 13.11.2009 (Annexure-3) passed by a Bench of this court dismissing of C.W.J.C. - 2 - No.15419 of 2009 it was held that the selection of candidates for allotment of petrol pump in question had already been recommended to be annulled by two members committee of retired Judges set up by the Apex Court and the entire selection process itself had become vitiated, hence it was found that the petitioner did not acquire a right by itself to be appointed merely because his name figured in the list of the empanelled candidates. 4. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances and specially in view of the matter having been taken up by the Apex Court, this court does not find any reason to entertain objection of the petitioner. He will be at liberty to respond to any fresh notice inviting tender in the matter. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. Harish (S.N.Hussain, J.)