•^ ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BllASPUR. WRrr pE'rmoN r c) No. 758 of2009 PETITIONER8 : 1. M/s. Chhattisgarh Tractors - Through its Partiier Smiil Kumar Jain S/o Sliii Shildiar Chand Jairs, aged about 42 years, Regd. C)ftic@ Plot No. 52, Industria! Estate, Yada't'iaiidaii Nagar Road, Bilaspur (C«G») 2. Suml Kumai' Jaiii S/o Sliri SiiiMiar Chajiid Jaii^ Aged about 42 years, R/b Bhartiya Nagar, Bilaspur (Cliliattisgarli) 3, Smt/Nisha Jain, 'W/b Shri Sunil Kumar Jam, .Agcd aboat 38 years, R/o Bhartiya Nagar, Bilaspw (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RE8PONDENT8 : 1. State Barik of India - Through its Deputy Geiieral Maiiager, Local Head Office B-yildmg, Hoshangabad Road, Bhopal (M»P.) 2. State Baiik of India - Thi-ougli its Chief Manager, Comrriercial Bran.ch, FCI Godown Road, Tarbaliar, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETmON: LIN'DER ART1CLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUriON OF INDIA SB: Hoii'ble Slui Satisli K. AgmhoM, J. Present: Stoi Aiwp Majmiidar, Advocate for the petitiofiers. Shri Sudhir Agrawal, Advocate for the responde$its, ORALOimER (Passed on 21st day of April, 2009) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioii.ers, on. m^tractiosis, seeks permission of ihis Court to withdraw th.is petition with liberty' to take recourse to other fbmm that may be avmlable to the..petitioiiers, im'der the provisiosis of the Secwitisation and Reconstmction of Financial Assets and Enforce.me.nt ofSeciirity Interest Act, 2002 „ 2.. . l.eamed counsel appearmg fbr oth.er side has no objection. 3» It is ordered, 4. Accordingly, tbe petition is disiTiissed as withdrawn with the above stated liberty. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Aimt