(^A^ w M HIGH COTJRT OF CHHATTT8GARH AT BILA8PUR Wru Pcttltt <S)No. 1778 uf2088 Shriram Sai S/o LMe Diiharam Aged about 64 years, B../O Village Pongro, Tahshil Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (CG). RESPQNnENTS : 1. State of Chhattiggarh Tliroughthe Secretary, Department of Panchayat & Samaj Kalyan, DKS Bhawan, Raipur 2. Accountant General of Chhattisgarh, Pandri, Near Bus Stand, District Raipur (CG). 3. Additionai Assismut Development Commissioiner, Vikas Khand Pathalgao", Distt. Jashpur (CG). 4. Joint Director Treasury, Accounts & Pension BiSaspur Division,Bilaspur (CG). 5. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Pathalgaon, Distriet Jashpur (CG). fWRIT PETmON IJNDER ARTIGLE 226 OP THE CONSTmJTION OF DTOIA) (SB: Hon'UeMr. SatisliK. Aemlwtri. J.) Presenl; : Shri Sanjay Agrawai, Advocateforthe petitiona-. Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advoca.te for the State. ..t ^.^l'*..^ (Fasscd on this 25th ofMarch, 20G8) 1. With the consent ofthe parties, the I'aatter is taken up for hearing finally. 2. The petitioner has flled an Identica! v^ii petition being W.P. No. 2945/06 praying for gfant ofGeneral Provideat Fimd amount as per e'ltry in his pass- book. 3. !n W.P. No. 2945/06, tliis Court on 23.06.2006, after hearing leamed counsel appearing for the parties, directed tlierein to the Accountant General of CMiattisgarh, B-aipiir, to consider the case ofthe petitioner regardmg final pa5?ment ofthe GPF and deeide the same within a period oftwo moiithgfrom the da-te ofreceipt ofa copy ofthe order. 4. Piirsuant to order dated 23.06.2006. the resnondent No. 2 i.e. Accountant General, CMiattisgarh, Raipur, had akeady teJsen act'on by writing a Istter dated 21.08.2006 (Aimexiire P/2) to the Additiona! Asg'stant Development CtinuTussioner, Pathalgaon, Digtt. Jashpur (CG). Further comniunication dated 13.10.2006 (-Anneiaire P/3) was sent from Chief Exeeutive OfBcer, r:r M: :[.•..' Sahii Janpad Panchayat Pathalgaoii, Distt. Jashpur (CG) to the Seiiior Accounts OfFicer, office ofthe Accountant Geiieral, ClAattisga-rh. Since the order has already been passed by this Court to the same effect m the earlier writ petition No. 2.945/2006 on 23.06.2006, this writ petition is not maintamable for the same cause ofacfioii, seeking for the same relief. 5. It appeare that the regpondents have already taken steps pursuant to the order dated 23.06.2006 passed by this Gourt. It is expected that, ifsomething is !eft in cotnpliance ofthe order dated 23.06.2006 iai the case ofthe petitioHef, the same shall be done as expec'ifiniis!y as possib'e. 6. In vi^^v ofthe fbregouig^ the ^frti ^tition stands disposed o£ No order asto costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri • 1 Judge /. .._; •^- ^ I •;! 1 ! IIIIJ 1 li i