IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 7640 of 2010 Date of decision: 10.05.2011 Pardeep Kumar and others ........ Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: None for the petitioners Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab for the respondent State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing of FIR No. 120 dated 05.11.2006 under Section 420, 406, 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Ahmedgarh, District Sangrur (P1). Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab, on instructions from HC Khalil Khan, states that the petitioners have since been acquitted vide order dated 14.12.2010 passed by the JMIC, Malerkotla. As such, the present petition is rendered infructuous. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 10.05.2011 mohan IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 19641 of 2010 Date of decision: 10.05.2011 Harpreet Singh ........ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: None for the petitioners Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab for the respondent State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing of FIR No. 120 dated 05.11.2006 under Section 420, 406, 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Ahmedgarh, District Sangrur (P1). Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab, on instructions from HC Khalil Khan, states that the petitioner has since been acquitted vide order dated 14.12.2010 passed by the JMIC, Malerkotla. As such, the present petition is rendered infructuous. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 10.05.2011 mohan