HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.9398 of 2006 ORDER: Several contentions are urged by Sri P.Venugopal, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, including that acquisition of land on which there is a road, and the road which is the only ingress to the petitioners’ factory, and that of the sub-station besides it, would be closed thereby resulting in the petitioners not having proper ingress and egress from their factory premises. On being asked as to how these questions can be gone into the present writ proceedings, since an award has already been passed, and the compensation deposited, Learned Counsel would submit that he would take necessary steps to question the validity of the award in appropriate proceedings. As the order under challenge in this writ petition is the notification issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and in as much an award has already been passed on 20.3.2006 and compensation is said to have been deposited, I see no reason to now set aside the notification issued earlier under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act. The writ petition fails and is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs. ___________ 20-01-2011 asp