..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.804 OF 2007 Sandeep Ganesh Patil ...Applicant. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Mr.P.M.Pradhan, Adv. for the Applicant. Mr.S.R.Shinde, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 16th April, 2007. DATED : 16th April, 2007. DATED : 16th April, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.I-250 of 2006 of 200 of Panvel City Police Station. The said case is mainly under Sections 302, 201, 120-B of IPC. 3. It is the prosecution case that the present applicant along with some other accused persons entered into a conspiracy to murder one Navratan Bafana and Dilip Thakare. The owner of Hotel ‘Visava’ has stated that on the day of incident, ..(2).. the present applicant and two deceased were together in his hotel. Thereafter, the dead bodies of both the deceased persons have been recovered at the instance of the present applicant. The gold ring of Navratan Bafana was recovered at the instance of the applicant. The weapons used i.e. knife and rope were also recovered at the instance of the applicant. Few days prior to the incident the applicant and one of the other accused had purchased the knife from the knife-vendor. The statement of the said person also implicates the present applicant. 4. There is sufficient material to infer that the applicant along with others had conspired to murder Navratan Bafana and Dilip Thakare. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to grant bail to the application. Application is rejected. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)