: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.77 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.90 OF 2008 Haresh Mansukhani & Anr. ..Appellants. Vs. Hemant Mansukhani & Anr. ..Respondents. Mr.Rajivkumar i/b.M/s.Ashoka Law Firm for the Appellants. Mr.N.R.Bubna, AGP for Respondent No.2. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 30TH APRIL, 2008 DATED : 30TH APRIL, 2008 DATED : 30TH APRIL, 2008 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : I do not for a moment suggest that the offer made by the Appellants is unreasonable. The Appellants have offered to deposit an amount as directed by the Court for doing up the said flat which is offered as a temporary alternate accommodation. However, admittedly, that itself will take some time. It is desirable therefore that the Notice of Motion is decided. 2. Considering the nature of the matter including the fact that the Appellants are senior citizens and considering the stained relationship between the parties, I would request the trial Court to decide : 2 : the Notice of Motion as expeditiously as possible and preferably by 31st July, 2008. 3. If there is any difficulty regarding the availability of a Judge in Court Room No.1, the learned Principal Judge is requested to assign the matter to any convenient Court. 4. Appeal from Order stands disposed of. Nothing survives in the Civil Application which also stands disposed of accordingly. ***