IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 20372 of 2010 Date of decision : 03.03.2011 Lakhbir Singh ...Petitioner versus The State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Ms. Naiya Gill, Advocate and Mr. Jatin Salwan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Palwinder Singh, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Mr. V.K. Sandhir, Advocate for respondent Nos. 5 and 6. Nemo for respondent No.7. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) The main grievance emanating from the record is that although, petitioner moved representation (Annexure P-9), but the same has not yet been decided by respondent No.2. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and going through the record, the instant writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2, to decide the representation (Annexure P-9) and to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. March 03, 2011 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) naresh.k Judge