IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 17085 of 2010 Date of Decision: 22.9.2010. Ram Parkash son of Parbhu Dayal --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Vikram Bali, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. R.D. Sharma, D.A.G., Haryana and Mr. Ajay Nara, Advocate present in the Court have been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents no.1 and 2 respectively. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. The petitioner is operating a hand cart (Rehri) at Panchkula for selling chat papri and golgappas under the license issued by the Estate Officer, H.U.D.A., Panchkula. H.U.D.A formulated a policy vide memo dated 29.1.2004 for allotment of small booths/kiosks for small traders. The aforesaid policy was supplemented by another policy letter dated 6.3.2009 (Annexure P-4). The petitioner applied for allotment of a booth/kiosk vide application dated 14.7.2010. The grievance of the petitioner is that the said application has not been considered by the respondents till date. CWP. No. 17085 of 2010 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if, the competent authority is directed to consider the application of the petitioner (Annexure P-5) for allotment of booth/kiosk in accordance with the policy of H.U.D.A. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to take decision on the application of the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said respondent. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 22.9.2010. lucky