IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37219 of 2010 ASHWINI KUMAR @ PINTU @ ASHWANI KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 02 26.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner is husband of the informant and there is allegation of torturing against him but learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner wants to keep the informant with him. He also points out that no attempt of reconciliation was taken by learned court below. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, petitioner, namely, Ashwini Kumar @ Pintu @ Ashwani Kumar, in the event of his arrest/surrender within thirty days from the date of communication of this order to the concerned court in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 90 of 2008, shall be released provisionally on bail for the period of three months on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Supaul subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2)of the Cr.P.C. Furthermore, the learned court below shall explore the possibility of reconciliation by fixing a date and ensuring the presence of both parties. The aforesaid process of reconciliation must be completed within three months and if the aforesaid attempt of reconciliation is failed, then in that circumstance, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner shall not be confirmed by the learned court below. It goes without saying that if learned court below succeeds in his attempts, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner shall be confirmed by the learned court below itself. Let this order be communicated to C.J.M, Supaul in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 90 of 2008 through fax at the cost of the petitioner. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)