IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Writ Petition No. 468 of 2005 --------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memo- Court’s or randa of Coram,appearances Judge’s orders Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s order. --------------------------------------------------- Shri J.Shekhar for petitioner Shri A.G.Damle for respondent no.1. Shri S.S.Sarkar for respondent no.2. CORAM: A.P.SHAH AND CORAM: A.P.SHAH AND CORAM: A.P.SHAH AND J.H.BHATIA JJ. J.H.BHATIA JJ. J.H.BHATIA JJ. 11th July 2005 11th July 2005 11th July 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Challenge to the constitutional validity of sec.19 is without any substance. The Act has been held to be constitutionally valid by the Supreme Court in 2002(4) SCC 272 (Union of India Vs. Delhi Bar Association). As far as the maintainability of OA is concderned, the petitioner is free to agitate all the contentions before DRT or DRAT, as the case may be. 2. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as above.