IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45964 of 2008 NITESH CHAUDHARY @ NAVIN CHAUDHARY @ NITISH S/O BALDEV PD. CHAUDHARY, R/O VILLAGE- SURSAND NEAR BUXAR KUTIR, P.S.- SURSAND, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 28/02/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant. The petitioner is the husband of Reena Kumari whose marriage was solemnized in March 2007. According to the FIR, it is alleged that due to non fulfillment of demand of additional dowry the informant’s daughter Reena Kumari was killed by her inlaws. Submission is that the victim accidentally caught fire and she was given best medical help. There was strike of the employees in the Government hospital so she was taken to a reputed private hospital. There was no concealment and no effort was made to screen the offenders. In course of treatment she died. It is further submitted that in course of investigation the supervising authority has found that the petitioner was not even present at the time of occurrence. The allegation of section 304 B of the Indian penal Code has been disbelieved and charge sheet has been submitted under section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. Prayer for bail was opposed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant. It is submitted that there is allegation against the petitioner. - 2 - Considering the supervision note and other facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner Nitesh Chaudhary @ Navin Chaudhary @ Nitish is directed to be released on bail on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Sursand in connection with Sursand P.S. Case No. 151 of 2007. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)