1 cal-460gr-11.sxw dgm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CAL/460/2011 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO. 30547 OF 2011 ALONG WITH LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO. 30547 OF 2011 Ratnagiri Nagar Parishad .... Appellant vs Ismil A. Latif Suvarndurgakar .... Respondent Mr. Rakesh R. Bhatkar for the Appellant. Ms. Pavitra Manesh i/by Mr. M.S.Topkar for the respondent. CORAM: D. K. DESHMUKH & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : December 08, 2011 P.C.: This is an application taken out by the Appellant for condonation of delay in filing Letters Patent Appeal. The delay is of 2 years and 72 days. 2 The Appeal is against an order passed by a learned Single Judge 2 cal-460gr-11.sxw dismissing the Petition filed by the Petitioner. The Petition was filed by the Petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. In view of the law settled by the Supreme Court, a Letters Patent Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent is not maintainable at the instance of the Petitioner who files a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India before a learned Single Judge. Hence, no useful purpose would be served by condoning the delay. Hence the Civil Application as well as Letters Patent Appeal stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (D. K. DESHMUKH,J.)