IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 388 of 2004 (M/B) Verbal Singh a/a 56 years S/o Shir Bachan Singh R/o Village Dadoli, P.O. Dadoli, District Rudraprayag .......... Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Secretary Education Department. 2. Joint Director of Education. 3. District Inspector of Schools, Rudraprayag. 4. District Magistrate, Rudraprayag 5. Incharge, Control Room, Education Department, Rudraprayag. 6. Sri Harendra Singh Bisht S/o Sri Jai Singh Bisht, Village Rudraprayag, Bhausal, presently working as lecturer in G.I.C. Rudraprayag ........... Respondents .......... Km.Jyotsana, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri J.P. Joshi, Addl. C.S.C. for respondents 1 to 5. None for respondent no. 6. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Km. Jyotsana, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri J.P. Joshi, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for respondents 1 to 5. None for respondent no. 6. 2. Km. Jyotsana, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition now has become infructuous. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 21.06.2006 21.06.2006 A