IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE SIDE SIDE REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW PETITION STAMP NO.12695 OF 2006 PETITION STAMP NO.12695 OF 2006 PETITION STAMP NO.12695 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.8735 OF 2005 PETITION NO.8735 OF 2005 PETITION NO.8735 OF 2005 ------------------------------------------------------------- Office Note, Office Court’s or Judge’s Orders Memoranda of Coram appearance, Corut’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders: ------------------------------------------------------------- Ms. Leena Patil, for the Petitioner Mr. G.K. Masand, for Respondent No.3. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & F.I. REBELLO & F.I. REBELLO & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 29TH AUGUST, 2006 : 29TH AUGUST, 2006 : 29TH AUGUST, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Counsel for the petitioner contends that one of the points urged in the petition was that respondent No.3 was not qualified. Such a point had not been answered by CAT. Learned Counsel contends that the point was taken in the petition before this Court. Even if it was taken it was not argued before us and the only point which was raised was about the constitution of the Committee which point has been answered. Considering that, in our opinion, no case for interference. Review Petition rejected (F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) (DR. DR. DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,.J) D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,.J) D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,.J)