SCA/5417/2008 1/3 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 5417 of 2008 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= P M SOLANKI - Petitioner Versus GUJARAT WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. & 1 - Respondents ========================================================= Appearance : MR TR MISHRA for Petitioner : 1, MR DG CHAUHAN for Respondent : 1, DELETED for Respondent: 2, ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT Date : 19/09/2008 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Rule. Mr. Chauhan, learned counsel waives SCA/5417/2008 2/3 JUDGMENT service of Rule on behalf of respondent No.1. Rule is fixed forthwith at the request of learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner workman has preferred this petition for appropriate relief against respondent No. 1 on the ground that though there was an award in his favour, the same was not being implemented and the reason for not implementation was pendency of Special Civil Application No. 7483 of 1998 and therefore even a prayer was made for tressing out the papers of Special Civil Application No. 7483 of 1998. 3. Shri Chauhan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that said petition was dismissed for default and for restoration of that matter, Misc. Civil Application No. 2815 of 2005 was also moved and said Misc. Civil Application was also rejected. Be that as it may. 4. Shri Chauhan, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 1 submits that the workman has already been reinstated and so far as the dues of workman under Award are concerned, the Court may pass appropriate order. 5. Shri Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner did not dispute the statement made by Shri Chauhan. SCA/5417/2008 3/3 JUDGMENT 6. In view of this, this petition deserves to be disposed of with following direction : The respondent No. 1 shall implement the award in its totality within period of 90 days from the receipt of writ of this Court. 7. In view of this, petition is disposed of. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Liberty to approach this Court in case of difficulty in future. (S.R.BRAHMBHATT, J.) pallav