CRM-M No. 28394 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CRM-M No. 28394 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.01.2011 Gurjant Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Daldeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.D. Sachdeva, Addl. A.G., Punjab for the State. Mr. A.K. Walia, Advocate for the complainant. ... Alok Singh, J (Oral). This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.20 dated 5.3.2008 under Sections 338/34 IPC read with Sections 25/27/54/59 of the Arms Act, P.S. Raman, District Bathinda. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has been enlarged on bail pursuant to the directions issued by this Court dated 29.9.2010 and he has joined investigation. CRM-M No. 28394 of 2010 2 Learned counsel for the complainant argued that before the grant of interim bail, during the investigation, the petitioner – accused had threatened the witnesses, hence he is not entitled to bail. Learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, on instructions from Mr. Veera Singh, ASI, states that neither custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required nor anything is to be recovered from him. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, present petition is allowed. Order dated 29.9.2010 is made absolute. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 20.01.2011 sk.