HIGH COURT OF dHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR D!V!-$!QN BEMGH CORAM I HON’BLE SHRI H.L. DATI'U, CJ & HON’BLE SHRI V.K. SHRNASTAVA, J. FETITIONER Ami Dixit, son of Shri S.N. Dixit, aged about 32 yearsx rlo. Hcusing Bcard Colony, Kumhari Bhiiai, Dist. Durg, CG. RESPONDENTS ‘ Versus WRIT ?ET!TION (PIL) NO. 1491 OF 2002 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Commerkcial Tax Department, Govt of CG, Mantra‘aya, D,K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. ‘ 2) The Commissioner (Excise), Raipur,CG. 3) The Assistant Commissioner (Excise), Bilaspur; CG. 4) The District Coiiector, Biiaspur, ' CG 5) Mist Golden Prince Wine indie Pvt. Ltd, Registered Office at Days! Band: Biiaspur, CG, through its Directors.- (i} Sardar Gurucharan Singh Bhatia, s/o. Surjeet Singh Bhatia. (ii) Sardar Gurvinder Singh Bhatia, s/o. Sardar Amoiak Singh Bhatia. (iii) Sardar Prince Bhatia, s/o. Sardar Gurmeet Singh Bhatia. 6) Mls. Bhatia Wine Merchant Private Limited, Registered omce, Dayal Band, Biiaspur (CG), through its Directors- (i) Sardar Surjeet Singh Bhatia, son of Sardar Harbans Singh Bhatiai \(ii) Amoiak Singh Bhatia, slo. of Sardar Harbans Singh Bhatia. 7) Sardar Surjeet Singh B‘natia, s/o. Sardar Harbans Singh Bhatia, Dayal Bandh, Bilaspur, Dist. Bilaspur, CG. 8) Amolak Singh Bhatia, slo. Sardar Harbans Singh Bhatia, Daya! Bandh, Bilaspur,, Dist. Bilaspur, CG. 9) Union of India, through Secretary, Department of Env€rcnment and Forest, Paryavaran Bhawan, New Delhi. 10) The Pollution Control Board, through its Member Secretary, Raipur,CG. 11) Chhattisgarh Audyogik Kendriya Vikas Nigam, Tifra, Bilaspur, CG. 12) Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State industrial Development and infrastructure Cooperation, B—4, Shailendra Nagar, Raipur, CG. 13) Director, The Town and Country Planning Department, Bilaspur, CG. :f PRESE NT: Shri Kishore Bhaduri, counsel for the petitioner. S‘nri Prashant Mishra, Addl. Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 4 and 13/State. Shri Ashish Shrivastava, counsel for respondent No.5. Shri Bhishma Kinger, Standing Counsel for respondent No.9/Union of lndia. ORAL 9RDER (Passed on 1e“ March 20w) The following oral order of the Court was passed by H.L. Dattu, LA.N0.6354I2003. By this appiication petitioner intends to withdraw this writ petition, which is filed as Public interest Litigation. Normaiiy, we do not permit to r do sot Since there is another petition pending for very same cause of action, we deem it proper to permit the petitioner to withdraw himseif from the case Accordingiy, application is allowed Consequently, this writ petition is also rejected as not pressed. /~/\ n (2) in View of the above, l.A.Nos. 4294/2003, 58722003 and 8340/2003 stand disposed of. Sd/- i l“. 7‘ , V.K. Shrivastava l ll Judge sdl- ‘l ll l Chief Jusu'ce