IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.BALACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 16TH OCTOBER 2008 / 24TH ASWINA 1930 W.A.No. 3811 of 2001(B) -------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN OP.15105/1995 .................... APPELLANTS: 1. S.MOHAMMED NAJEEB, JUNIOR MANAGER (INSPECTION), CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION, DISTRICT DEPOT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. K.MEERA SAHIB, OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, MAVELI MEDICAL STORE (RATIONING INSPECTOR ON DEPUTATION), DO. DO. 3. P.REMA DEVI, SENIOR ASSISTANT, REGIONAL MANAGER'S OFFICE, THYCAUD, TRIVANDRUM. 4. N.MOHANAKUMARAN NAIR, DO. DO. 5. P.VILASINI AMMA, COMMISSIONERATE OF CIVIL SUPPLIES, PUBLIC OFFICE BUILDING, TRIVANDRUM, REGIONAL OFFICE, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.K.L.NARASIMHAN RESPONDENTS: 1. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. DIRECTOR OF CIVIL SUPPLIES, BOARD OF REVENUE, TRIVANDRUM. 3. C.M.BABU, RATIONING INSPECTOR, C/o DIRECTOR OF CIVIL SUPPLIES, BOARD OF REVENUE, TRIVANDRUM. 4. R.BALACHANDRAN, ASSISTANT, GRADE II, U.D.CLERK ON DEPUTATION, KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION, MAVELI BHAVAN, KOCHI-20 (NOW WORKING AS RATIONING INSPECTOR, TALUK SUPPLY OFFICE, AMBALAPUZHA). Sr. GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BEENY GERVACIS FOR R1 & R2 SRI.R.RAJASEKHARAN PILLAI FOR R4 THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J.B.Koshy & K.P.Balachandran, JJ. --------------------------------- W.A.No.3811 of 2001 --------------------------------- JUDGMENT Koshy, J. This appeal is filed against the judgment of a learned single Judge in O.P.No.15105/95. Against the very same judgment another writ appeal was filed as W.A.No.1024/98. In that writ appeal, these appellants were additional respondents 5 to 10. Since the above judgment is binding on them and applicable to them, they cannot file a separate writ appeal. It is submitted that against the judgment in W.A.No.1024/98, an SLP is already filed and is pending consideration. The matter will be finally governed by the decision of the Honourable Supreme Court. Hence, this appeal is disposed of in terms of the judgment in W.A.No.1024/98. (J.B.Koshy, Judge) 16th October, 2008 (K.P.Balachandran, Judge) tkv 2 J.B.Koshy & K.P.Balachandran, JJ. --------------------- W.A.No.3811 of 2001 --------------------- JUDGMENT 16th October, 2008