SSK/23 1 caw 525.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 525 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3734 OF 1990 Prabhakar Shankar Kulkarni & Ors. ....Applicants Versus Maruti Krishna Mane & Anr. ...Respondents Ms.Anagha Nimkar i/b. Smt. Varsh Palav, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. R. A. Thorat for respondent nos. 2(a) to 2(j). CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATED : 21st MARCH, 2011. P.C.: Heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties. 2. The civil application is filed for restoration of the above writ petition. The petition was dismissed for default, since neither the petitioners nor their counsel appeared when the writ petition was called for admission on 19th October, 2010. The circumstances in which the petitioners could not appear are mentioned in paragraph nos. 2 to 6 of the application. I am satisfied with the explanation given in the said paragraphs. A case for restoration is made out. The civil application is accordingly allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). (RANJIT MORE, J.)