<> ^^3^^ -^ iWlil.fc IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.ISl N0. /2010 PETITIONERS 1. Smt Frisca Kindo , W/o Shri Bartholomius Kindo, aged about 40 years, working as Head Master, T.W.D., Govt. PrimaTy School, Rengarbahar, Block-Duldula, Distt- Jashpur (C.G.) 2. Smt Prabha Kujur, W/o Shri Rradeep Kujur, aged about 38 years, working as Head Master, T.W.D., Girls Pritnary School,Bipatpur, Block Duldula, Distt- Jashpur (C.G.) 3. Suresh Chouhan S/o Late Shri Chaitan Ram Chouhan, aged about 42 years, Workmg as Head Master, T.W.D. Primary School, Naktimunda (Dalhagoda), Block-Kansabel, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1.' State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 Assistant Coniniissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jashpur, Distt.- Jashpur (C.G.) .b 3 ' Block Education Of&cer, Block - Duldula Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) ^ Block Education Officer, Block - Kansabel Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) Q Treasury Officer, Treasury Account & Pension Jashpur, Distt.-Jashpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ffia :* sn^i ^i R-ii'* TWT 3H^T sh^i<ft ^^( -^1<<1<1<4, (S'dl'M'lto, fa(fl!<Hll,< ^_ w.y.jsjm^ 311^1 TR^ (1cltl'«\^) TOitWdfttt sn^i 23-08-2010 Shri Somkant Verma, counsel Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Ad^ advance copy. Heard. Learned counsel appearing petitioners are entitled to benefit oftw they having passed B.T. I. examinatio; own cost. it is submitted that the issi no longer res integra and the sanq Hon'bie Supreme Court in the case ^ Ors., 2009 (l!l) MPJR (SC) 59. It is aiso taken a. similar view in his <t W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. Learnedl dravre attention of this Court to ord^r A.ppeal No. 124 of 2009, wherein Supreme Court in the oase of Asha ^ by this Court in another Writ Appe^ issued for consideration of the oase as per circular dated 21-09-1974 issij after verification ofthe facts pleaded | Learned counsel for the rest petitioners wouid also be considered ~<<iw[ft41-i iTfrof ^f fe^ TfSn^R ^srRinsiR^i for the petitioners. 'ocate for the State/resoondents on |or the petitioners submits that the ro advance increments on account of h before enterinc) into service at their ae involved in the present petition is :e has been finally deoided by the ifAsfta Saxena vs. State ofM.P. & Further submitted that this Coyrt has )rder dated 06-02-2009 passed in counset for the petitioners further ;r dated 29-04-2010 passed in Writ relying upon the judgment of the [axena (supra) and the order passed No. 87/2009, directions have been for grant of two advance increments |ed by the State of Madhya Pradesh, n the petition. wndents sybmits that case of the 3n the same lines. ^ '^l-ipTR —I.'S/' •47—2 '2(11 il —1,00,000. t' ^-f-1 "i, SIT^I 'VI h-9* 7Pff 3T^T sh*l ^. TSf'*ll<41d''4, »ill'«<iS,fa|dl'H4< ^_wl^.}.^:.(&^^.. sn^i'^qr ('^3^?) 'ronwgfpi sii^i In view of the statement disposed off with a direotion to the decide the olaim of the petitioners fj3r per circular dated 21-09-1974 issi|ed after verifioation ofthe facts pleade^ •weeks from today. •»illii-l<i)-i1WRT! ^ fs'ZT 'CTSR^TC ^.sffiman^! made above, this petition is finally •espondent authorities to consider and grant of two advance increments as by the State of Madhya Pradesh, in the petition within a period of eight Sd/- ManindraMohanShrivast Judge ava?