IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20448 of 2010 RAM BABU, S/o Paltu Mahto, R/o Village-Mabi, Police Station-Rosera, District- Samastipur. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 03.03.2011 The petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 13.01.2010 passed by the SDJM, Samastipur in Samastipur P.S. Case No. 717 of 2009 by which cognizance under Sections 25(1-B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act and 192 M.V. Act. It has been submitted that even though two independent witnesses were named in the First Information Report they have not been cited as charge-sheet witnesses and, therefore, the trial would be as nullity. Since, at the stage of trial even additional witnesses who are not named in the charge-sheet can be examined if found to be necessary for the just decision of the case by the Trial Court, I am not inclined to interfere in the order impugned. The Trial Court will consider examination of such witnesses if it feels necessary to do so at the appropriate stage. With these observations, the application is disposed off. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)