IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.CHELAMESWAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH JUNE 2010 / 9TH ASHADHA 1932 WA.No. 1114 of 2010() --------------------- (AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 24.6.2010 IN W.P.(C)NO.17913/2010) APPELLANT(S): PETITIONER ------------------------ M/S.VIJAY LATEX PRODUCTS PVT.LTD, PLOT NO.35, CHANDIVALI VILLAGE, OFF SAKHIVIHAR ROAD, ANDHERI EAST, MUMBAI - 400 072 REPRESENTED BY AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR.VEERA GANESAN. BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KURIAN RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.1 2. THE KERALA MEDICAL SERVICES CORPORATION LTD., NRHM BUILDINGS, GENERAL HOSPITAL JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.1 3. M/S.AGE INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LTD., V/58, SINICON HOUSE, IDA, KANJIKODE WEST, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678 623. BY SR.G.P.SMT.K.MEERA FOR R1 BY ADV.SRI.M.AJAY FOR R2 ADV.SRI.BIJU BALAKRISHNAN FOR R3 THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J.CHELAMESWAR, C.J. & P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ----------------------------------------- W.A.No.1114 of 2010 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of June, 2010 JUDGMENT J.Chelameswar,C. J. Aggrieved by the order dated 24-6-2010, by which the interim relief was declined in the writ petition, the petitioner therein preferred the present appeal. 2. The matter pertains to the award of a contract by respondent No.2. The appellant and the 3rd respondent are the competing contractors. When the matter was taken up today the learned counsel for the second respondent submitted that though the second respondent entered into a contract with the 3rd respondent for the supply of some materials the necessary purchase orders are not likely to be placed immediately. In the circumstances we do not see any reason to interfere with the order under appeal. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the respondents agree that the writ petition itself will be heard at an early date. We see some justification in the above submission. Therefore, the writ appeal is disposed of. List the writ petition for hearing on 8-7-2010. J.CHELAMESWAR, Chief Justice P.N.RAVINDRAN, Judge. ahg. J.CHELAMESWAR, C.J. & P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. --------------------------- W.A.No.1114 of 2010 ---------------------------- JUDGMENT 30th June, 2010