HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.24770 of 2001 Date: November 25, 2010 Between: 1. A. Lakpathi Nayak & 12 others. … Petitioners and 1. The A.P. Power Generation Corporation Ltd., rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, Vidyutsoudha, Hyderabad and 2 others. … Respondents * * * HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.24770 of 2001 ORDER: None appeared for the respondents. 2. The petitioner is questioning the action of the respondents in not considering the cases of the petitioners as per B.P.Ms.Nos.36 and 37, dated 18.5.1997. 3. According to the petitioners, they worked as contract labours from 07.7.1998 to 30.12.1999 for construction of the K.T.P.S. Vth stage and again petitioner No.1 worked as such under the contractor K.T.P.S. Vth stage Tribal Cooperative Society Limited, Paloncha from 15.5.2000 to 31.12.2000. The second petitioner worked as Welder under contract labour Mamatha Women’s Tribal Labour Contract Cooperative Society, Karakavagu from 18.5.1999 to June 1990 and again he worked under another contractor from 15.01.1988 to April 1989. Likewise, all the petitioners worked under different contractors from different periods and as per the B.P.Ms.Nos.36 and 37 they are entitled to absorb in 50% of the vacancies. But the respondents have not considered them for absorption in 50% of the remaining vacancies. 4. In the counter respondents have pleaded that the petitioners have not produced any material whatsoever to establish that they are entitled for absorption as per the guidelines issued in the B.P.Ms.Nos.36 and 37. 5. Now the petitioners’ counsel has pleaded that he is having necessary documents to show about the petitioners working under different contractors and they can produce the same before the respondents as such they may be directed to consider the cases of the petitioners for absorption as per B.P.Ms.Nos.36 and 37. 6. Since the objection raised by the respondents is only about not producing the proof of their employment with the contract labour as on 23.9.1996 and as the petitioner is ready to produce necessary documents before the respondents, the respondents are directed to consider the cases of the petitioners for regularization as per B.P.Ms.Nos.36 and 37 on their producing necessary documents within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order if they fulfil the required qualification as mentioned in B.P.Ms.Nos.36 and 37. 7. Accordingly the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _______________________ P. DURGA PRASAD, J Date: November 25, 2010. Note: Issue CC in one week. //B.O.// BSB