r w Anmmmn/xm W SIN§LE §ENCH § 1 g N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (c ( w.P. (S) No. y1?§[ 200 PETITIONER : gemraj Jharia S/o Shri B.L. Jharia eAged about 49 years s4 D1n Dayal Upadhyaya Nagar, /%xv .. ‘ W .- ”w a, Raipur (CG) 3‘f W$ J VERSUS (’ ‘gh ~ - aak A«A-w. ‘ RESPONDENT(S1 :1. The State ofChhattisgarh % Through the Secretary, Commercial Tax Department, D.K.S., Bhawan, Raipur (CG) ( 2. Dy. Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh Commercial Tax Department, D.K.S,, Bhawan, Raipur (CG) / W é(di mvwwu w ? 9 $‘ M , uw \ ’1 “g. Shri RK. Trivedi, S/o Shri S.D. Sharfna, Aged about 54 years, Appellate Dy. Commissioner, Commercial Tax Department, Civil Lines, Raipur (CG) / V 4. Smt Kalpana Tiwari Aged about Ajn3g—a—né—VV W/o Shri —R:K———Tn¥:ew View: Appellate Dy, Commissioner, Commercial Tax Department, r Durg (CG) ) RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF E CONSTITUTIN OF INDIA @ W TH O HIGH COURTOE CHHA'ITISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETI’HON (S) No. 7279 of2009 PETITIONER : Khenuaj Jhan'a'. , VERSUS RESPONDENTS ; The State of Chhattisgarh & Othem WRIT PETITION UNDER AR FICLE 226 OF I‘HE CONS I‘ITUTION OF INDIA SB Hon’ble Shri Satishgégmhotn, J ‘ Present i 31m P S Koshy, Advocate for the petmoner ' Shn V V S Moorthy, Dy AG for the State/respondents l 8c 2 ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 29 day of March, 2010) 1.‘ Laamed counsel appearhig for the ’petitioner‘ submits that aiier filing of this petition, the petitioner hat: been gamed promotion by order dated 14.12.2009 prospectively, i when the juniors to the petitioner were granted promotion earlier In View of the subsequent development, Shri Koshy submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to make a representation to the respondent-authorities, and iiirther the respondent authorities may be directed to consider his case for grant of promotion I viith effect horn the date his juniors were promoted, in a'ecordance with law. L i V i 2 1 I Shn Moorthv learned Deputy Advocate General appearing for the State/respondents l and 2 submits that m the event, the petitioner makes a representation, xthe same. shall be considered and decided in accordance with law on its own merits and perspective, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within aperiod of four weeks noni the date of - the representation. 3., In‘ view :‘of the above submission, according to learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication in this petition at this stage. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of