km é @WQ BEM? E ”CD r Ob [/j _I_N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR X WRIT PETITION (S) No. imam 0f 2006 e NDIA , GX§ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22%[227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF I x am v pETITIONER : / Gajanand Shanna S/o Late Shri Paras Ram Sharma , aged about 55 I (a e a year§JMA§I$~i§I§IALWQrIaISi§JH, QifIgeWEfExecutwe I, ,, Engia§§r, Public Works Department, $oe"‘§%/cq\ cyyny" Raigarh , resident of Sahid Chowk , Hanuman Mandir, Infront of New Bharat Q:;ee°":‘__.x" W Press Raigarh (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1.The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary , Public Works Department, Mantralay , k” D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). (ea/’5’ / ' 2. Executive Engineer, f“ vm¢(:«;.f"‘*v/ ' \4 ”‘99 Public Works Department, Division 96 . i” Raigarh, Tahsii and District Raigarh (CG). XI—HC-78 HW,®?1‘1W $9.? .N}: ~. xxx WW‘ ,W §.§..9.§ a 200 Waarm WWW WWW 11.8.2006 Mr‘ SK. Thomas, Advccate fart MrlGKl .Beriwal, Dy. Advocate C Heard. By this petition, the petitioner 6.7.2006 (Annexure P—1) whereby he r to Ambikapur Circte, The main grievance of the pei Grade-ill and the seniority of Assistant circle wise and in support, gradation which has not been denied by learned [ o e WWEWW &31%1T3n%31 ‘ Roshani. 1e petitioner. tenerai for the State on advance copy. itioner is that he is working as Assistant Grade-ill employees are being maintained ist has been enclosed as Annexure P—2, )eputy Advocate General for the State. Learned counsel for the petiti r submits that if the order impugned IS ta allowed tonexeouted, then the seniority f the petitioner shall be affected, therefore, the petitioner may be allowed to mak a detaiied representation to respondent NO.1 and in tUm‘ he be directed t0 ded e the same in accordance with law. Having heard learned counsel f r the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the Caee, the petitioner lS aHDwed t0 m grievances to respondent No.1 within O days from today along with copy of this petition & annexures and in turn, resp ndent No.1 to decide the representation of 'from the date of receipt of representation all the points raised by the petitioner. in the meantime, till the deci ion of the representation the effect and operation of impugned order dated 67.2006 (Annexure P—‘l) in respect of the petitioner shalt remained stayed. With the direction aforesaid, the Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.318 Certified copy as per rules. Judge a detailed representation raising all h IS the petitioner within a period of 3O da in accordance with law after considerin petition stands disposed of. 106 also stands disposed ofk/ % & % 6 \ § \ W t ? ) Sdl- L.C. Bhadoo mmieiaass) has challenged his transfer order dated as been transferred from Raigarh Division 1". EU. a y