IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5345 of 2009 RAMYAD SHANDILYA & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 5. 16.08.2010 The petitioners seek quashing of the order dated 28.4.2007 by which cognizance has taken under Section 323, 307, 379, 494, 498 (A) of I.P.C. in Complaint Case No. 990/06 on the ground that the matter has been compromised between the parties and the petitioners are bound by the terms of the compromise. On the other hand the opposite party no. 2 has appeared and states that in fact the accused persons are not obeying the clauses of the agreement and therefore the case be not quashed for reason of compromise. In my view, since in the facts of the case there is a definite allegation against each of the accused persons of having tortured the opposite party no. 2 this court declines to interfere in the matter. In view of such this application is dismissed. In case the petitioners are still ready to compromise in the matter it would be open to them to file such petition in the court below. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )