IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS TUESDAY, THE 10TH MAY 2011 / 20TH VAISAKHA 1933 WA.No. 564 of 2011() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.11161/2011 Dated 06/04/2011 .................... APPELLANT: PETITIONER ------------------------ SUNIL THOMAS, S/O. C.I.THOMAS, AGED 23 YEARS, CHIRAMEL HOUSE, ST.THOMAS NAGAR, ARANATTUKARA.P.O., THRISSUR-680618. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY.P.O., MALAPPURAM-673635. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT,CALICUT UNIVERSITY.P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-673635. STANDING COUNSEL, SHRI P C SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS JJ., - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.A. No.564 of 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 10th day of May, 2011 JUDGMENT Antony Dominic J., By judgment under appeal, the application filed by the petitioner for revaluation was ordered to be published within a period of eight weeks. Being aggrieved by the time limit of eight weeks prescribed in the judgment, the writ petition is filed. 2. In our view, the period of eight weeks fixed by the learned Judge cannot be stated to be unreasonable and therefore we do not intend to interfere with the judgment. Accordingly the writ appeal is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, (JUDGE) M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, (JUDGE) dl/