(-1-) hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2119 OF 2007 Maharashtra Rajya Suraksha Rakshak & General Kamgar Union ... Petitioner Versus Nashik Suraklsha Rakshak Mandal and Ors. .... Respondents Ms. Vaishali Bhilare for Petitioner. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & R.M. SAVANT,JJ. R.M. SAVANT,JJ. R.M. SAVANT,JJ. DATED: MARCH 30, 2007 DATED: MARCH 30, 2007 DATED: MARCH 30, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . For the order to be passed, no notice need to be served on the respondents. The Petitioner contend that the respondent already been served. The Petitioner represents security guards who are the Members of the Petitioner union. If the security guards apply for registration to Respondent No. 1, the same should be considered and disposed of not latter than eight weeks from today. (2) It is further case of the Petitioners that the respondent No. 2 must be registered and that has not been done. Respondent No. 1 after giving notice to Respondent No. 2 to take steps according to law at any rate not latter than eight weeks from today. With the above observations, Petition (-2-) disposed of accordingly. Petitioner to serve copy of this order on Respondent No. 1. (R.M. SAVANT,J.) (R.M. SAVANT,J.) (R.M. SAVANT,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)