IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.687 of 2010 SURESH PRASAD @ SURESH MAHTO @ KAMTA JEE, S/o Late Laxman Mahto. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 18.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 342, 379, 353, 307, 171C and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. Taking into consideration the fact that the First Information Report was instituted against hundred unknown persons and later on the name of the present petitioner transpired and apart from two other cases there is no other case pending against him and he does not belong to extremist group, let the petitioner above named who is in custody since 12.11.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati (Gaya) in connection with Imamganj P.S. Case No. 5 of 2005 - 2 - subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)