••^ K3il.t:BE"'ys tp) ^Q ^- IN THE HIGH COURT OFJUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR W.P. fS) N0. g^^ / 2007 Y Petitioner ^•y\ .•• ^^^h^ ..••••";"^5^" y^'J^'" ^- ^' .•••' Versus Restiondents 1. ^ ^^ 2. 3. ^ ,4. ^5. Smt.Krishna Kumari W/o Harkeshwar Singh, Aged about 30 years, R/0 Village - Banwarkho, Block-Odgi, Tehsil - Sur^'piu-, Dist: Sarguja-(C.O.) State of Chhattishgarh, Through The Secretaiy, Departmenf of Women and Child Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (G.O;) The CoUector (Women and Child Development),Sarguja-(C.<3'.) The Projeet Qfficer, Women and Child Development, Odgi, Dist : SargujafC.G.) Village Panchayat Bhanwarlcho, Through - Sarpanch Bhanwarkho, Block - Odgi, Dist: Sarguja-fe.O.) Smt. Sita W/o Shri Bhimsen Lalera, R/o Village Bhanwarkho, Block-Qdgi, Tehsil - Surajpur, Dist: Sarguja-(C.G.) fr WRrTPETITION U/A 2^6 OF TRHE GONSTmJTION OF INDIA FQR ISSUANCEQPWEmN"EHENATUREOFMANDAMUS, eERTIORARI, PROHIBmON ETC. \-.- '^J HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPU^ < Writ Petition <S) No. 658 of 2007 Petitioner Smt. Krishna Kumari Versus Respohdents State of Chhatti^cB-h & others Sirgle Bench; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. ^gnlho'h'i. Present: Mr. A.N. Pandey,Advocate for thepetitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lciniyer for the State/respondents No. lto3. ORDER C (Possed on 7'1' Day of February, 2007) ^ The followin9 order of the Court was pcesed by Satish K. AgmhoM, J. 1. Learned counsel appearirg for the petitioner submitfi that the appolntment of respondent No. 5 is contrary to Anganbadi Scheme, as respondent No. 5 belorgs to other ward and her father is a &overnment employee. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submits that the petitloner is living below the poverty line (BPL), as such the petitioner has preferential claim over respondent No. 5 for appointment as Arganbadi Worker. :^ :1 2. Subhash Ee thatcs itmay, inthe facts and circumstonces of the case, the Collector (Women and Child Development), Sarguja/respondent No. 2 is directed to look into the alle9ation made by the petitioner and poss appropriate prder in accordance with Anganbadi Scheme and Idw. The writ petition is accordiryly disposedof.No order as to costs. :r ^. .sa/-;: Satiisli.ieg Judge]