IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9630 of 2010 PRANIYA KUWAR WIFE OF LATE BARAK YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – KARWA, P.S. MUFASSIL NAWADA, DISTRICT – BHOJPUR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BHOJPUR, ARA. 2. THE DY. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BHOJPUR, ARA. 3. THE TREASURY OFFICER ARA, BHOJPUR. 4. ACCOUNTANT GENERAL BIHAR, PATNA. ----------- 02. 25.06.2010 As prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in paragraph – 5 of the writ application. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, State as also the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the payment of balance retiral dues of her husband who died on 17.10.2004. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submits that the grievance of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 2. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by 2 the petitioner within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. Upon consideration, if any of the claims or part of the claims are found not admissible, the same shall be informed to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)