In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh RFA No. 431 of 2004 (O&M) Smt. Sham Dulari and others ..... Appellants vs Land Acquisition Collector and another ..... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. Ashish Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal J. The landowners have filed the present appeal against the award of the learned court below seeking further enhancement of compensation. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the State of Haryana vide notification dated 23.2.1989 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, “the Act”) acquired the land situated in villages Patti Insar, Patti Magdum Jadgan, Tehsil and District Panipat, for public purpose namely- for the development and utilisation thereof as residential and commercial area in Sector- 13, Panipat. The Land Acquisition Collector assessed the market value of the acquired land @ Rs. 81/- per square yard. The petition filed by the landowners under Section 28-A (3) of the Act, was dismissed by the learned court below vide award dated 20.11.2003. It is this award which is impugned in the present appeal. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the claim made in the present set of appeals is squarely covered by the judgment of this court in Review Application No. 31/CI of 2007 in RFA No. 1379 of 1994– Nand Lal and others vs State of Haryana and another, decided on 31.8.2007, whereby compensation payable to the landowners for the acquired land was further enhanced to ` 139/- per square yard. Learned State counsel did not dispute this factual position. Accordingly, for the reasons recorded in Nand Lal's case (supra), the appeal is disposed of in the same terms. 11.8.2010 (Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge