IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR <oSS^~ WRIT PETITION (S) No. Of 2007 PETITIONER NisarAhmad, S/oLate Shri NazirAhmad, aged about 64 /years, •..•••"''n&'1^ Retired Assistant Block Education Officer, \^y"...--'- -sSft^ ,,...-:!''ry> y (R/o Near FCI Godown, G.E. Road, RaipurNaka, Rajnandgaon (CG). VERSUS <>»•• RESPONDENTS :1 4. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralay D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). The Director, Directorate of Public Instructions, Bayron Bazar, Raipur (CG). The District Education Officer, District Rajnandgaon (CG). Joint Director, Treasury Accounts and Pension, Raipur (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA l:ll K b-1 1. 2. ^- 3. mGHJ;OURTOF CHHATriSGARH^BILASHJR Writ Petition (Sl No. 6565 of2007 Petitioner Nisar Ahiuad Versus Respondents The State of Chhattisgarh & others (Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution oflndia) (SB: HonTile Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri Rakesh Aathony, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Shri A. V. Shridhar, Paael Lawyer for the respondents/State. ORDBR(oral> ( Passed on this 9th day ofMarch, 2010 ) Heard. Learned coiuisel appeanag for fhe petitioner submits that fhe petitioner is a^neved by tfae inaction on the part of thc respondents, as the petitioner was not granted the benefit of second tuae bound advanceinent (Rramouaatij after coaipletion of 8 yeara of service froia fhe date of graat of first time bouqd advaaceinent He farther submits that the case of the petitioner is coveicd by fhe order dated 28*tl Jaauaiy, 2008, passed by this Court ia W.P.(S) No. 574/2008 (Gauri Shankar Sharma Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & othera). Leamed counsel appearing for fhe respondents/State subnuts that the petitioner may file a repiesentation to the concemed aufhority to consjder his case ia the light of the order passed in Grauri Shankar Sharma (supra). In view of the foregoing, fhe petition stauds disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to makc a representation to the conceraed authority ia fhe l^ht of fhe order passed by this Court in Gauri Shaakar Sharma (supra), which may be considered aud decided by the coinpetent authority, in accordaace with law, within a re^onable period. No order asto costs. Tfaabur Sdl- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge '^'•^•^Ss^^^^ss'^&SSSS^S^