IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 11TH JULY 2008 / 20TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 17149 of 2005(N) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ CHEMMANIKUNNUMMAL KUMARAN, S/O.KELAPPAN, AGED 48 YEARS, CONVENOR, COMMITTEE FORMED FOR ELECTRICITY CONNECTION TO CHEMMANIKUNNU PUMPING PROJECT, POST VILLIAPPALLY, VADAKARA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.B.KRISHNAN SRI.R.PARTHASARATHY RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD WITH ADDRESS FOR SERVICE - SECRETARY, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDHYUTHI BHAVANAM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VADAKARA DIVISION, VADAKARA. 3. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, MAJOR SECTION, VADAKARA NORTH, VADAKARA. 4. ANARATH AHMED HAJI @ AMMED HAJI, S/O. MOIDU HAJI, AGED 47 YEARS, TRADER, ANARATH HOUSE, POST. VILLIAPPALLY,VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE J.MATHEIKEL, SC, KSEB FOR R1 TO 3 SRI.S.SREEKUMAR FOR R4 SRI.N.M.MOHAMMED AYUB FOR R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.17149/2005 APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS EXT.P1:- COPY OF THE MINUTES BOOK OF THE MEETING OF THE COMMITTEE FORMED FOR ELECTRICITY CONNECTION TO CHEMMANIKUNNU PUMPING PROJECT ELECTING WRIT PETITIONER AS CONVENOR ON 8.8.99. EXT.P2:- COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP.(C) NO.31576/04 OF THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA DT. 1.12.04. EXT.P3:- COPY OF THE ORDER NO.D2-13191/05 OF THE ADDL. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KOZHIKODE DT. 27.4.05. EXT.P4:- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION BY CHEMMANIKKAUNNUMMAL KUMARAN (PETITIONER) TO RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 DT. 28.5.05. /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE tss KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ----------------------------------------- W.P(C) No.17149 of 2005 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of July, 2008 JUDGMENT In the matter of drawing of electric line there is already an interim order dated 8-6-2005. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the said interim order and with liberty to the 4th respondent to approach the 3rd respondent in case supply has not been given in which case the 3rd respondent will take appropriate prompt action to give supply to the 4th respondent through the available and most feasible alternate route. (KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE) ahg. KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ----------------------------------- W.P(C).No.17149 of 2005 ----------------------------------- JUDGMENT 11th July, 2008