IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 243 of 2006 (S/B) O. D. Mangal S/o late Sri R. D. Mangal R/o 112, Arya Nagar Block-2 Dehradun District Dehradun .............. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Executive Engineer PWD Construction Division, Narendra Nagar Tehri Garhwal, Uttaranchal 2. State of Uttar Pradesh through the Secretary To the Government of U.P. PWD Lucknow 3. The Accountant General (Lekha & Haqdari) Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad 4. The Executive Engineer P.W.D. Construction Division Narendra Nagar, Tehri Garhwal, Uttaranchal ............ Respondents None for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 & 4. Ms. Beena Pandey, Standing Counsel (U.P. Govt.) for respondent No.2. Mr. Arvind VAshishth, Assistant Solicitor General for respondent No.3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Petitioner’s counsel absent. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 & 4. Ms. Beena Pandey, Standing Counsel (U.P. Govt.) for respondent No.2. Mr. Arvind VAshishth, Assistant Solicitor General for respondent No.3. 2. As there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, we are left with no other option but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. Consequently, the interim order dated 28.07.2006 stands vacated automatically. 5. Stay application No.9484/2006 as well as the Stay Vacation Application No.11942/2006 stand disposed of accordingly. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 14.03.2007 14.03.2007 LSR