1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9116 OF 2011 IN C.R.A.NO.954/2000 1) Smt.Shiverathibai w/o Harinath Gupta and Ors. - APPLICANTS VERSUS 1) Omprakash s/o Shriram Holani and others. - RESPONDENTS ***** Mr.SP Salgar, Adv. h/for Mr.SB Talekar, Advocate for Applicants; Mr.SG Chapalgaonkar, Adv. For Respondents. ----- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 14th NOVEMBER, 2011. PER COURT : 1) Heard. CRA No.954/2000 was dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, CA No. 9116/2011 is moved for condoning delay of 327 days in filing an application for restoration. 2) Both the parties, indeed, do not dispute to condone such delay of 327 days and to restore the CRA No.954/2000 to it original position. 2 3) In the light of the statement made by both the learned counsel for the parties, delay of 327 days, caused in filing application seeking restoration of the CRA, is condoned, CA No. 9116/2011 allowed, CRA No.954/2000 is restored to its original position. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/