IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 27TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 8TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 34068 of 2008(E) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SUNILKUMAR M.S. S/O.SUBRAMANIAN, MULANGATH HOUSE P.O.KATTOOR. BY ADV. MR.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN MR.K.S.RAJESH RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- THE SECRETARY, KATTOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH P.O.KATTOOR, IRINJALAKUDA, PIN 680 702. ADV. MR.N.P.SAMUEL FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 34068 of 2008 EXT.P1: COPY OF THE LICENCE DTD 18.2.86. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE RECEIPT DT. 7.4.2008. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT DT. 15.11.08. EXT.P4: PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING THE POSITION OF SHOP ROOM. EXT.P5: REPLY FILED BY THE PETITIONER DT. 17.11.2008. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS EXT.R1(a): COPY OF COMPLAINT DTD 6.11.2008. EXT.R1(b): COPY OF FIRST INFORMATION REPORT OF THE KATTOOR POLICE STATION DTD 1.11.2008 AS CRIME 309. EXT.R1(c): PHOTOGRAPH OF THE NEW CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING. TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE. S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.34068 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of February, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner challenges Ext.P3 by which the petitioner has been directed to demolish a building. 2. I have heard the both parties. Ext.P3 is only a provisional order. That being so, the respondent is bound to pass final orders, after considering the objections filed or to be filed by the petitioner. In the above circumstances, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondent to see that Ext.P3 is taken to its logical conclusion by passing final orders, after hearing the petitioner also as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd