IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.6423 of 2010 Date of Decision:- 08.04.2010 Rajinder and another ....Petitioner(s) vs. State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s) *** CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH *** Present:- Mr.R.K.Vasisth, Advocate, for the petitioners. *** AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (Oral) Counsel for the petitioners states that the names of the petitioners do not find mention in the Voters' List. He contends that against the non-inclusion of their names, the petitioners had preferred appeals under Rule 10 (2) of the State Election Commission Rules, ( Annexure P-2 and P-3 with the writ petition). He states that the said appeals are pending with respondent No.2. He states so on the ground that no order has been communicated on the appeals preferred by the petitioners. His submission is that a direction be issued to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the appeal preferred by the petitioners within some specified time and if already a decision is taken, the same may be conveyed to the petitioners. Without going into the merits of the case nor commenting thereon, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the appeals if preferred by the petitioners, as alleged, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. If a decision has already been taken on the appeals, the same be conveyed to the petitioners forthwith. Petition stands disposed of. April 08, 2010 ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) poonam JUDGE