em 64 r1 11 1 CWP No914 If2010 V Jn the HighCoulrt ofPuniaband Haryanaat Chandlgarll Dateofclecisionl 11 182Ill Il 1CWPN02914012010 Virendcr Singll Vs Statctlf I Jarvalla21IclOtllcrv 2 CWl 5ct7477 oi 20110 1 0 Klishiill16 1111211and 111hci7l V9 Sllllc ol I Iai0c et di ld c1IIlt1i 0 3 CWl No329 of201 0 C0 X RajbirSinghand othcrs Vs Statcof Ilaryan8Jnd olhci s C0 X 4 CWI No 1441302009 r Prem Singh Vs Statcofilarvana ancl r Z 5CWPNt014111nf2010 C 1lleICKulbir Singh t111 anotherVs Statc01 Haryallaailcl Z 6 CWP No536 ul2010 05 00 KaplanSiiigh VS SlatcotIlarvot12tarjd 011e C J 7 CWJ No2113 012010 Z DeshRajand rllllers Vs Stiiie of l wyanaaild olhcrS Ll 8 CWP No147 of2010 EHCRanl Mchar ond othcrs Vs State 01 I laryaiiaand othcrs 0 9 CWP No0443 of2009 C Jai Pal and another Vs State of7 wyana aild otllcr5e 10 ClEI No6619 of2009 SliolawEin lill Vs Slale111lIaryallil Alld 41111 013 lle CI15148222192 IfeadConstable Ashok Kumar Vs State Iflalyatla and olhcrs 12 CWPNo12237 of2992 Parkash Om 2014.05.03 10: 30 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 65 Cl 94 CWP No914 0120111 2 NarenderKumar Conslable Vs SiateofI Iarvanaand others 13 CWP No12248 01 2009 Jit Singh HC V5 Stale 01 Harvailaand others 14 CWP No 12253of2009 SubhashChanderEIiC others m 15 CWP No16975 of2009 O 0 Krishan Kumar 1314CVs Slateollalyana allclotllcrs C0 16 CWP N018430012009 I C Panna al EHC Vs Stateofllaryanaand others I 1 1 ClNo3863of2009 2 Rai Klllllllr clllli V5 5tuli tlfIlarlaiIn iitltJtIl14221 m C 18CWPNo189190f2009 er Kamal Parkash EHC Vs StateofHarytina and others 08 1 9 CWP No 636 of20 10 0 Lady onstableRaibala VsSlaleofHaryana and othcrs m4 2 m1 20 CWP No 2775 of20 10 4 mw C Rishi Parshadanclothcrs Vs Stateof Haryana and othcrs 2 1 CWP No2875 of 2010 Iatiy 511111Il Vs SlatoeoflIarvaitaritid 41t11Cl 22 CWP No 2968 012010 Sada Ram EHC Vs State ofHaryanaand others 23 CWP No 3338 of2010 KaptainSinghand another Vs State ofHaryanaand Ithcrs 24CWPNc333670f2010 EHC Mohan 11iil Vs State ofHaryanaand others Parkash Om 2014.05.03 10: 30 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 66 9 CWP No2914 of2010 3e 25 CWP N03556 of2010 Hans Ranl and others Vs StateofHalyanaand others 26 CWP N 4258 of 2010 Hari Krishan HC Vs 17inancialComlnissioner8LPJillcijoltlSccictilyttl Governinent and olllers 27 CWP NoA274 of201 0 1 C 20 Amar Sing5Ei lC 11s Stalt ofHaryuno cnd oulcr 0 28 CIVP Vo749 01 2010 Ce3 r ASl anclanotllerVsStatc of Haryanoand otllers C5 Z 29 CWP NoA765 of2010 er ChhajuRaln and anotllerVs Stateofllaryanaanclothers Z t 30 CWl NoA960 of2010 Cl RajbirSinghand othersVs StateofHaryana and others 3 1 CWP No 4963 of2010 O Qo Satbir Sirh Vs StateofHalyanaand olhers t m 32 CWP A7423 ol2010 Z CL JaivirSinghand otllersVs StateofHaryana and olhers 33 CWP No60310f2010 Ilardayal116 and olhersVs StateofHaryanaand otllers Ge CORAM1 HONBLE MR JUSnCE PERMOD KOHli Presen Mr SK Redhu MrVikram Singh MrN Yadav MrOinesh Malik MrPtitam Saini MrSurcncler la01111Ill MrRP Singh Advocatesfor the lctitit31Ciso MI lS Kundu Addl AG l Iaryanafor Ilherespotldeilitie PERMOD KOlll1 J Parkash Om 2014.05.03 10: 30 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 67 5 e CWPNo29140f20111 ee 09nthe llasisof coinmon and idenllicalissucs b0Ill tlll factsand law all lhese Ioetitllllls loeillgdecided bv lhis conlllltlll Ordcr ihc elltire colliOversv relales tcl the o Rule 137 0111101uiljllbiooliceRules 134 as appllcable to tlle Stateof I laryana aondarnendedvide Punjab Police AmcndlllCllllRulcs 2001 W Cr hereinafter refcrred lo as the Rules lhis rulc rclatcs lleplitEIliOtl for 0 Lower School Coursc and for enlistingof the eligiblcofllcers Ill list l CmO for their promotioioThe aincnded rule sulljeclnlatter tll dcbatc in the I C5 presenlwrit joetitionsis reproduced llereunderl 137electioil of candidateslor adnlissitlil Io Z C0Urses al Ihe Pclllcr 649Ilcgclj llil bw r e B in FonrI l 371 1311bl iliailllIIlJlctl iIy C911t1 I of Police It shall include thc 06 CO names of all constablesselccted for adinissiclil 3 to the Lower School Course to lle hcld at thc Z Police TrainingCollegeSelcction to llle Iist B shall be made Ill the rnonth 0January cach 1 1 ycarand shall be limitcd 10 the Illitllbcr of seats 9 allottedto lhi dislt iof thc yca Ihc numbcr of scats in Luwer School Cuurse lrI o year sliHll be on the basis of existing vac811ClCS and the vacanctes likely to be created with itl one yeur 111 tlle respectiveUllll 55 of the ses allotted to a unit in the Lower School Course shall be fllled in on the basis 01 i coinpetitivc Parkash Om 2014.05.03 10: 30 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 68 440 CWP No2914 of201 09 exaininatlon 35 Oll the basis of Cumilness and 10V0Oll thc basis 0 collsislent in Gold Or Silver Medal in All IndiaPtIlicc IVlcelNational GaincSor cxceptitmaldlsplayo f t L braveryduringthe coursc of perlilrnlanceof 0 0 offlcial dutv Seleclion clflcrsoiisa111115t132 0 seats 111 511cc 011 tltc biisii of meril C I shall be done by a Prclmotion 4t Z Comlnilteeon thebasisof V C Cr 1 ExanllllatiOllOfservicesand X 08 2 A colnpelitivetest Ihcreiilaftercallcd 13 1 rlo C testlllll wa Z 0 CL al Pradc bl Law andpractlcalpoliccworl 1Illd 3An Jnterview 2 9 All constables lrrespectivc of thcir C educational qualiflcationsshall Ioeeligilole10 appearforBl tesl thcy arc ulldcr the age of 35 years and havc completed 5 years of SOllllCC Orl 1 day Ol January0thc ycar in whicll selcctioi is madc I ltlwevcr il a Parkash Om 2014.05.03 10: 30 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 69 e 1 1 4 CWPN02914012010 6 constabie bclongingto rescrved catcgory who is recruitedalllerattaiillllg thc agc 01 27 years as per Glveminent inslrlictionslordcrs thcn he sllall be allowcd 1l appear for milllmulll lhree COnseclilivc chailccs aftCr L offivc ycars of service cven if ile 0 has crosscd the age of 35 ycars up t0 a C I llllllimunl of 10years C40 Z 6iil All Constables irrcspeclivcof their W cducLltioiial ualillcations shall bc ciigible10 C C Z lle IlroullhlOll i5t 131 i1illril1 0um mcrll C4 basis i f thcyare Ullder Illc age tlf 400years CQ and have 5 ycars01 scrvice on the amr e ea firsl dayof January011llle vctlr in which selectionis made 5e Thc Statoeof Haryanaissuedinstrucfiotlsdaled 1302007 t1lCnlitlimuin mcrit to fulflll lhe crileritI f71rsenioritv cumfltiless relyingupon the observations ofthis 071rt It9 the cose of Naresh KumL Vs State nf Harvanrt 1104Ul CWP No952 t01 20041decided on 051 12004 Director General of Police Haryana lssued these instructions prescribing llllllllTlUIn betlch marks for selectionto 13 list under 35Io quota hc rclcvanl extract oflhe IllStruCtlOtlS dated 130O2007 6AnnexureP79 Ill CWP No6427 of Parkash Om 2014.05.03 10: 30 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 70 CWP No 2914 of201 0 7 2009 1s hcreundci l Il view 0 1the Honble lllgh Ill the Naresh Kumar case sulorlll it has beell decicledto flx thc benchmarks Ior Iltnessunder 35V0 scnlorloeCUITltllCSS Cllit 110c m Cr assessment of scrvice rccord sliIulcl bc inade 0 Cs0 Oll the basis of educatlioil lriIlillllg courscs 2X2 C P3ssedcumillendBIitlll ccrtl flcalias ciIid IcllItl 01service ctc 1IS817Cll 111FPR 3 7lll tllc 49 t Z candidates wllo oblaill a Illilllllltllll 3 1 Illa rks r C or more would be deemed t bc Ol Ior I selection of 13I seats against354 juotaon the basisof inteese selorityof the candidalesand CO C for all such caildidatcs i iltcrse scilioritvwould em Z bc the sole criteriaor dcpuliilllOll their turil 1 ulldcr 351474uta ill VlClell Il lhc cxloliciiordcr of 14igllCourt Please lake fuIllIcr noces81 action 99 The valiclityof these 111StrLICtlOllS has been uphelcIby this Court in Hawa Sinlih Vs StateofHarvana and others 6CWP No1194 of20051decicled on 14052008 There are three sets oofworilpetitionsunder consideration The sanle are broadlycategorised111the following maniler a ihe cliiloility olthc condidates who aIpeareclln 5 5916merit 1 1 Parkash Om 2014.05.03 10: 30 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 71 4P CWPN0291402010 promotioil qutltauilder Rule 137 il to beconsidcied liIi under35 evenif theyhave cd bl coIlsideralioilof lhc candidateswith Iessthan 35 ears 01ageas lst tlay C J3nuaryof Tle year 111whIcll selection is mode in 35 on Ol Cr quota01 enloriacuinnerit 0 0 C 1 interse seniorilyofthe candidates Oil thc bEisistll hcllcll Illarks I lll termsof DGPs iilslniclions datedl 3022007 0 I Frolll the readitlg of Rule 13 l l it elnergcsas followsl Z 6al lhat 55Yo of the seats allotted to a Ulllt in the 1ower Schooi m Course are nlcant to be tllled Ill on thc basis 0f colnpetilille C CX81111 08 1b9 104011hcsealS il tlle basisof cl CO Ct C I IOIo sealS Oll ihe basis of consistent l1erlorllance Ill KW3 Z 2 elc Selectitln against55 lS lo Ile nlade hy the PronlotionalCoinmittee All the const2lloles 1 of their educiltional qualiOcationwho are Icssthail 35 ycars 0 age and have conlpleted5 years of servlce on Ist day of January01 tlheycar IIf selcction are eligibieto alloear for Be l testundcr 4 r104 1 ets nf4504 aaA 4 1 1 quota SimilarlY9 all the constables irrespectile of tlleIr educatlonal qualillcationhavingcompletedfive years of service and in the age of 40 years Oll the lst day of January of the year tlf selecllOll Parkash Om 2014.05.03 10: 30 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 72 0 b CWP No 2914 of20111 m9 are eligible rl bc hrollgllt Oll Iisl 131 on the basls t1 1 Ol 5LiaUilll1 e meril again71l596 Illola Sportspcrsons under 1 quota Elrc ltl bc considered subIectto eligibilily tlle abovc Iwo 1Il categones 1 tr The coiltroversyrelating to the eligibilitytlfthc cailcIidatcs 0 who failed to securc Illerequisite inerlt ill the 0 I under 55Io quota to be againconsiderecl under 35o sclliOrltyClllll C5 merll quota OSlllc 111Ilecuilsicleredll 4 Dillision lilcll 111lllls l 0111 44jc Z l tl NarcIl Klllllars case Isupral 1his IO19ioil 13cilllIlIlloIgillclil lVr challeilgcdbefore the Honble SupremcCourt iil Spcciiil1eavc to Q I AppealCivil9No 10409of2005 which hasbeen disnlisscd iil Iitnine 08 Oll 10052005 m et A sitnilr ISSlIC Callle Up for considcrationbclorc tllis OUrl m2 Z 111 thc case of Hawa Singh Vs Stateof Harvallaand Otllcrs CWP Clm decided oiI 14052008 After adinissicllloftheINrit petitioilb1 Lh l lun010 DivIsion Rcocll lllc lalter lvas ctlll9iclcrcdlll a 1 learncd Sinlle Jlidge 01 lhis Court foi fliIal dlsposallll 19 11211116 The learned SilngleJudge ofthis Court was ofthe opinionthal CCl18111 Ce prOV1SlOllS of Rule 13 ofthe rules wcre not brought10 lhe tlOIllCC cIf the lOivision Bench and on that basis a reference was made for consideration 0f the wri l petitoionand other COllllected niatters Ily a Division Bcnch ofthis Courl The aforesaid writ petttlon came trl be heard by a Division Bench oftlhis Court Thc 011ble Iivisitll 13ellcll Parkash Om 2014.05.03 10: 30 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 73 r Il 4 CWP N02914 of2010 10 vide ils j udgnlentdated 1415008 afflnllcd the ratiO 1Il Naresh Kuinars case supralwith thefollowing observatiollSl I n vicw of the facls mentioncd abtIvc these Writ pelitlonsare allowcd lll the Silllle tCrlllS IIS 111 Naresh Kunlars case supral hc e l arC clirected ltl dcpulethc 0 0 C to the flrst Lowcr vhich wi Il colllnlellCe aftci thc C5 of judgmenl lll this case Hol4 evcr The 4 Z shall be decmed to IlavequaliIlcd lll the Iowcr Scllool Coursc ft0111tlic dale whcil C olher constables have qualiflcdV1IlCISC lllllllCS C Were approvcdlo UndCrllO 1IlIVCr School C Ouursevide selectlisl AnneAurcl Ilis nl2idc Z clear that if by gettingrelrospcclivedale t tl passingtohe 1ower Schotll toursc the petitioller became eiigible lor proillotitliltJlell he wi ll get only deeined Ileiiellts witloout gettingany actual Onancial bencflts in view clf C principleofno work no pay 99 IiIid dowtl by 8S their Lordshipsof tlle Holl6le Stlllrelne Crlllll lll Uilion of Illdla and anolher vs IlirfIcrn lal and others 02006110 Suprcmc Coun Cascs 145 137 Parkash Om 2014.05.03 10: 30 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 74 1 V4 CWPN029140f2010 ll Iione the Division Bench furtherconsidercdthe validitI of the instnlcliotlsdtlted 13022Oll7 ttnduphcldits valic tIe observationsl So far as CWP N03609 of2007 is conccriocd Ill lhat writ petitionselect lisl preparcdto ulldergo m f Lowcr SchoolCourse on thc basls 01 instructIOIlS 0 daled 132007 as refcrred to ahovc hus becn C As has becn hcld earlier abovc sad I C5 are perfcctlyjustifledand arc Ill 4 consonancc with the direclions issued by lIllS Z C0lirt ilI Ntirei K011ir14case t supi ii I m C TIIC Ol SIlril4ot thc nl pttltlOner5fur dcpullllO 10 I Lower School Course have becn rejectecl on lhc grouildtllal tllcyIlaviilg 08 failed in 55A tncrit quota are 1101entitledlo be considered fcIrbeingbrought CQ 1 on List I3l in 35Io quota The claims of SOIT1Cof the writ jlcllitlnersIlave me Z been rejectedtor beingbroughtin List 131 uncler35Io qLlOllitlll IllCgrlluild Cla thatthey were of Iessthan 35 yearsof age as on Isl day01Jonuarytlf the year of selecliotl some cases the claims have locctl for non 1 achievin thc IlllI11111l1111 3 1 IocncltIllarkS111 lerITISUl 1 1 ir1r001nllC dated I3022007 ln Nash Kurnars CtlSe 8pral tlle IItonIIe Ulvisicn Ge Bench ruJed the eligibilityof the constables for their considcrittion botll lll 55Io and 35Io quota 77hls Judglnent has attalncd flnallty le Sl P hus also been dismissed by the Honble SuprelneCoun The ratio of the snid j udgmenthas been reiterated lll Hawa Singhs cases supral as also ln Constable Dharmbir Vs Statc of Haryana and othcrs 2009 I 9 RSJ 3 10 wherein the followingobservations have been tnadel Parkash Om 2014.05.03 10: 30 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 75 CWPNo9110f211111 12e ee0ev4 eee4 eeee2222 13 So therc ElrC three disli ilct cillegori es with lhelr own atIcl rcquiretllcilts lor eligibility for consideration 11erciS 110 bar to COtlsideration of a constable in ail catcgoryif he fulflJlstheeligibilily cnteria i he is cligibleIll m C all threc categorics he has Sllitlllclryrightto 0 COllsidcratiootl lll all lIlrcCCole8l11 It5 I ll C Kl t la Cm3 0111 not categoii7e r Ieqlllre 59111C 218C C0 for eligibilityunder any ofthe categrics What it X specillesis the upper agclllllil 171ctInsideration Z 5r undera particular calcgory 2 C Despitc lhese inslructloilS CCrtcllll ISSUCS rclerrecl to Cr I hereinabove have llgalll CroppedUPe The contrcIverse regardingthe 08 eligibilityofcaildidates under 35 yearsoJagefor bcingbrt11glll Oll Iist 134 ao Cr for 3596quota agaiil caine up 17Ircoitsidcratioll bv anothcrlOiiisioil Bench 4m0 Z 01111S CoIlrt in Dh21111r5CEIse 1p0r01 aild Balrai Slllgh and orlhersVs CL Stateof iliarvanaand olhers 2009 12IRSJ 46 lll 191rnhir casclsupral 7 a Division Bcnch of this Cout1held as under1 17 A conjointreadingofboth the 6 Subrules would show that only the upper age Iimit G 0eW has been prescribed under the rules and 110 Illlniillum age has Ioeen prescribedelther undcr submrule2 i or subule 2 iil which nleans that ifa constalole f7116Ilsthe reqttire1neltl ol llle U611J11 age und 1he other 4ualr11catitnsptesrlhed under the respectivecategory as per subrule 2 there is Parkash Om 2014.05.03 10: 30 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 76 1 4 CWP N02914 012010 13 110 b to his consideration undcr cach ofthem Mcaninglherebya constable who is eligiblcIll unc Ilnder Rule I37 121Iil caii olso 11e CtlllSldercdin the olher ciitegtlryunder Rlilc l l7 121 iil of the PunjabPolice Rules ii tllcrt i5 110 1 0 hifurcaloioilbetween thc rules 21S Iar as the 0 eligibility lS COllcerned wi tll rcgitrd ltl lhe C0 Illilllmuln age as none is prcscribed Z C0 I The Illlllllnulll age if hy Mlilyof I 4t CXCCUlIIIC ttlStrUCtIOtlS would go agaillsll Ilc Z r interest of the Constables wllo arc Ilthcrwse m r elifiblc uricr c 81811ltooRulcs kulc 13i l I er Z Iiil 00111015 rlBhIwhirh 20Oilsa111 ItlIllS OIll tl V tllc Ioasisof his sclllorlly 11 lhe scrl icc As ilild r wlleil his turn conles basedon the senitlrity a rigllt m2 Z to COllsiclerationdevolves on him hi righlOll Om the basisofhis seniority cannot bc depriloed 011 Ille basis 01 executivc illstructiotls lllts wtluld be in contritventlOn to the statutoryrules and tIIcrefirc C not Sli Stoinalole 22 What enlergcs from thc above dl1loIIsSiIJllSlS thal a constable who has coinpleted 5 yeurs ol serVICC On the Ist day of January of the year Ill whichlhe selection is made is undcr 1hc age 01 35 yearsand is cligible for considcriltion titld selection for includinghis natne in lisl 13 I clf Parkash Om 2014.05.03 10: 30 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 77 1 CWPNo2914of20111 1 cIected colistables 1lui adlTllSSlOIltCI 1 1w01 ScllliIl Coursc underthc Cltl the basis If tncril as per Rule 13 7 2I lil ofthe PunjitIlPolicc Rules 1934 alld havlilg in the coinpetitive tcst B 1 ancl faIcd Or Ivas unahlc to gel i enlistmentdue to lowcr mcrit alsc clainl con 0 consideration and selectionlitlder thc 350 cIuota C0 Oll tllc basis 0f scnioritI r0r jl 1tlf J C5 137 21 6iil Il Ile 1 eliihle uildli bolh thl Z categones 9 Z As not iccd above the constableswho havc attiiilled IlllllllllUnl 3 1 bench marksunder 35Io quotahave beenignoredand tllcirjuniursWCrC X deputed to the cOurSC Otl tlle grounclthat thcyarc morc lncrttoriollS llllVlllg 08 betterbench marks This iSSUC lS 111facl covered utlder Narcsh Kuilltllsl Co r case supri and came to be clarifled Itl 13aJraiSinghs cass SlllOnil Z wherein il has becn hcld that whcrevcr a junior has been dcputedlllr 25 C1 Lowtr School Cotlrsc ititlg the l18rl ol the sclliol merelyoii thc baSiS oftlle hiiler bcll11 IlltlrKS the senior bc deIJutcd lor Iile coursc and he IN ill 17 be deenledto have passedlhe course froin the datehis junilli llas clualilled ln such situation senior will retain his seniority 4Ae There is another aspect of the mattcr The DUPs Instructions dated 13022007 arc onlyprospectivetll naturc Prior to thcse instructlons no bench lnarks were prescribedunder tlle statutor rulcs and tllus all those constabl es vvho acquired eligibiiity prior to issuancc of hese inslructions h2vc bcen denied the deputation to thc 11 1e Ilr7tol v 19 1120 for non achieling lhC minimum bench m3rk9 il is seltltl Iaw thal Parkash Om 2014.05.03 10: 30 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 78 6 6 CWPN029140f21110 5 instrlictioils cannot overrule thc statutorytulcs 1s tlleSC lllStructtOllSCallllot Ioe lnto servlce to depri ve thc constalllcsof their righl for deputatioil IIr ilot havingachievcd the tniniillulll l1etlcllillarks tis tinder llJese mstructions issuwl later llllis sticll of thc constabics Ivho bcc311lCeligibleprior I issllallce ofthce instrItclions aild Um lgnored101 llut achIcvilIutlle omiilllnumbetlchnlarksarc to he f0r C 3 0 Lower SchoolCoursc and on 0tllc coursetlley arc 0 to he treated sell iclr thall Iheir julliorswllo leverc carIicr cleputedto tlle I C0 LowerSchool Cotirse In other words thcywiIl retlilll lheir scniorityl7w X beingbrought on 119t Bml that theyWerc for tllc Z course Iatcr thantlleir julliorsor thcydid not acllicvc nlinitnLim bencll S CC Olarks r Z SillIiarll suilll lof thc constalllt9 IvllOare ignoreu oii accuoi il 08 of achieln lcss lhon t hcllc11tl21115512tl11lcilj1itlioi re CO Cr alsoentitledto be dcd t0 the course and on coinplctioilIltlle same 11ill mm Z retaltl theirseoniorillo over theirjuniors CL I ll sonle of tlhe writ the coIlslables have alrcady the 1Iwer School Coursc but they Ilave bcen deniecl tlle 1 7 sentorlty over their juniorsOll the ground that lllc juniorswerc eil her having better bench tnarks or deputedfor the courseprlOr lll lIlllC Ihan lhe C Wrll petitioners Jn vieIv ofthc above observaliotl Olee writpeOonerssl be deerned 10 be senior to their juniot deputedearcr on acetJnt f beuer benchillarks tlr 4In any othcr ground of eligibility o sutn up thcse are disposcdofwitll the following dilrectionsl i1 Such of thc who have failccl in 55Yo merit qliola Parkash Om 2014.05.03 10: 30 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 79 1 II CWPN029140f20111 16e are erllillcd lo 3 c7dired filr beingl2r40tIlOll 1isl I9 1 lindcr 354otIUOItU Oll thc of lOl1 2C2 tll ho alld are lllerwise eligible under thcrules iil such ofthe consloles wllo were Iesslhan 35 years01ageas on theday oftheir consideration but nol more than 40 years thcywill hc entilled to be 1 C brought on Llst Bl Ilydeputingthemto Lower School Coursc 7 0 ii the petitioners who acquiredeligibilitypriorto the DPs inslrlICtltIIlS 0 dated 13020117 Ivill be deputed for the COurse without tlle X C5 questioilof miniinitm bench lnarks as prescri Ioecl 1enIor Illea Z r4 instruciions aod Jl7 thclr CaSCS ind othcr cligibill cri telI O Z prescribed ullder thc rules will be enouglllt llleit dejolliticltltil tlle couise Q ivl lhe petilioIlers who becameeligiblelor deoutatiotlaller the isstiance01 lr the instructionsdated 13022007 and havc achieved thc mininlum hench 08 marks Ioedeputedto tllc course bctler CQ benchlnarks 7 Z 3 v1 intcre scnioritv ofthe constahleswill be deternIined1111 lhc basis f Ll their seniority in llleir respective districlo in llle colostabulat 111 not on the bnSiSOf j11iS3i115 tllc LIwcr Scllr7Gi50tIl In all sllcll CdSCS Wllo aIC 1 ignurcii Ily tllc 1174741irecti0ns t Iowl ihcl illter2 SC1110rll31 jll constables will not be governedby the above dircctions whcre Sell l Or WaS e ignored on account of pendencyof any dsciplinary proceedingsOl Who sufred any other disqualificationfor dcputalionto ltlwer Scllool Cotitsc vi deputation0f the petitionersshall bc lnade on the basis of their 1 1 seniority in their respeclivedistrictosancl againslthe avEiilalIe vac2i11cies Let tllc claiin of the petitionersbe considercd irI Ihc lightof Illc abovc directitons und their deputal Nhereeever it7i hr1 tnadc i n 1 Parkash Om 2014.05.03 10: 30 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 80 1 CWPN029140f2010 7 accordancewith the abovedirections A copy of lhis orclerbe pIaced on the recorclof each connected 1 eeo Il082010 IPERMODKOHIIl BLS Ii lJ ae C 3 0 Noticl Whcllicl o ll icferrcd to tlle Rcpoilcr7Yl5S 40 0 e 1 X er Z 1 rW r er Z Oll OQ C Z L1 Parkash Om 2014.05.03 10: 30 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document