IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46388 of 2009 1. SIDIDHESHWAR PRASAD @ SINDHU 2. SHASHI @ SHASHI KUMAR SINHA 3. CHANDAN KUMAR @ CHANDAN 4. NAYAN KUMAR 5. VIKASH KUMAR --------------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 3.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Apprehension of arrest is due to allegation for offence under sections 406 and 420 IPC which according to learned counsel, is not applicable as money if any was given for obtaining job by illegal means which casts liability upon giver and taker both. Any how petitioners are on police bail. I find no reason to discontinue the same if merit of the allegation is taken into consideration. It is made clear that petitioners are not in need of further relief for anticipatory bail while they are already on bail so granted to them in Rampur P. S. Case No. 115/07 pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya. This application for anticipatory bail is disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)