IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25757 of 2010 UPENDRA SAHNI & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04/ 29.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned P.P. for the State. Admittedly, petitioners are not named in the FIR and on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused they have been made accused in this case. Allegedly, one mobile set has been recovered from the hut of each petitioners. But contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the said mobile sets have not been used in the alleged crime. The report of S.P. East Champaran, Motihari shows that petitioners do not have any criminal history. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as detention of petitioners in jail custody, petitioners (Upendra Sahni and Raju Sahni) are directed to be released on bail in connection with Chhatuani P.S. Case no. 127 of 2008 on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000-/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)