6“ IMLE BENCH D?vw, @ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATI'ISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G) w.P. s No. é 2011 PETITIONER Ramaashrya Pradhan, aged about 59 years, S/o Shri Sadhram Pradhan, Head Master, Government Primary School Sarhar, Block Bamnidih, Distt. Janjgir Champa (C.G.) VERSUS :1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director, Public Instructions, Raipur (C.G.) '\ 3. District Education Officer, Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Block Bamnidih, Distt.Janjgir—Champa (C.G.) «y ,yé‘ n> WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA “ ‘ HIGH COURT OF CHHATI'ISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (SI NO.647 OF 2011 ~ PETITIONER Ramaashrya Pradhan Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India)‘ , Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Pr S Ad f p esent :— hri K.S. Pawar, vocate or the etitioner. S Shil bey, Gt. Aocate fr he‘ Stae hri us Du ov dv o t t. (Pa on t ' dy uar 011) ssed his 3 a of Febry, 2 . Her Iearn co f e parties 1 ad ed unsel or th . 5 By thi pet te ptiner s prayd f a diectin to h 2. s ition, h eito ha e or ro te repodens t onider te ase o the ttione d pvde ben of R 2 (D) of he Chatisgah Fundmtl Res g f incens, as d uner h rues al o a aea e dt w i bece de th ae hen t am u. the y outset, Iearned cnsel appearing for the peon At ver ou titier sut tt enti atter a re bn nsdere dde b hi rt e rer ae --200 in W.. (S o99 f 006 ad he cse of th i i sq cved b t ai ecsion. Leard consel apen h ate es o isue t ne u parig for te St do nt dpt that he ce of the eite qul ere b he re thi or in W.P. o.991 o 006. arne ousel uhe s h i t etn ils r rera bor te e utitie or relis, hch e a came w is etitin, t sm shall e osiere ad ecided i on h bt vion of f For he forin reaons, in pttio is spos it a t egog s the stant ein died of wh liberty to the eon mak r eprsnati eor esponnt hes aig ll of his gce rised i ths rde autoriti rsin a rievans a n i petition and on such representation being made, the respondent authorities shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law and on its own merits, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representati0n_ ‘ ""‘-’—/»//11. i l Sd/é Satish K. Agnihotri \ Judge snt o cs h c f peir an roi efit F 2 t htr aena ul,for rant o remt provied d te l and so t py rrrs from l'/ 7 N.41 o 2 n t a e pettioner s uarely ore y he sd di as ptionr is sarey covd y t odr passed by s Cut (S) N4 f 2 Led cn frtr submit tat f he ptiioer fe fesh pesenttion efe h concrned ahors f the ef wi h hs lid by ay cf th po he ae b cndd n d n accrdace wit law, sujec to erificat acts. GoWri ' ORDER ORAL bmis ha the idcal m hs alady, ee coid and ecid y ts Cou vid od dtd 2738 P ) ptitier to e a fesh reeton bfe the