IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32823 of 2010 JAI NARAYAN PRASAD, SON OF LATE GANESH PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 323, 406, 420, 504 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the case arises out of a financial dispute between the parties and there was a counter version also of the occurrence. In view of such, in the event of surrender of the petitioner, named above, within three weeks from today in connection with Bettiah Town P.S. Case No. 236 of 2010 arising out of Complaint Case No. 1082 of 2010, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C., and (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii)That the petitioner shall undertake to be represented on the first date after cognizance and in case 2 he fails to do so, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled, (iii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, and (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)