IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A. No. 1902 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: December 06, 2011 Paramjit Singh .. Appellant Vs. Smt. Sukhraj Kaur and another .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate for the appellant. A.N. Jindal, J The trial court, vide judgment dated 1.2.2010 dismissed the suit for declaration filed by the plaintiff- appellant and the appeal filed by the him was also dismissed by the appellate court vide judgment dated 25.10.2010. Both these judgments are now under challenge before this court by way of this regular second appeal. The marriage between the parties took place in January, 1998 and it is admitted that they lived together up to May, 1999 and the child namely Harpreet Singh was born on 28.1.2000, therefore, both the courts below while drawing the presumption under Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act held the paternity of the appellant. Even after the birth of the child on 28.1.2000, the appellant- plaintiff never challenged his paternity and he filed the suit after six years i.e. on 8.4.2006. Both the courts below have returned the concurrent findings of fact that the minor child namely Harpreet Singh is the son of the appellant- plaintiff. No substantial question of law arises in this case for determination. Dismissed. December 06, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge