// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT PRINCIPAL SEAT, JODHPUR ORDER In S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.3934/2009 {Banti @ Rajesh Versus State of Rajasthan} Date of Order ::: 29th July, 2009 PRESENT HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Shri D.D. Chitlangi, counsel for the petitioner Shri Anees Bhurat, PP for the State of Rajasthan #### By the Court: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the relevant material made available to me during the arguments of the case. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that it is first time that petitioner remained absent, resulting in forfeiture of his bail bonds. Now he undertakes that he will attend all the dates fixed in the case. He further submits that heavy bail bonds may be taken from the petitioner. After considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, examining the record and the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on its merits and demerits, I think it fit and proper // 2 // to allow this application under Section 439, Cr.P.C. and the same is hereby allowed. It is, therefore, directed that accused-petitioner(s), namely Banti @ Rajesh S/o Kailash Kumawat be released on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C., in Regular Criminal Case No. 133/2000, pending in the court of ACJM, Pratapgarh (Raj.) arise out of the offence registered under Section(s) 363, 343, 368 IPC and Section 3(1)(12) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh) only together with four sureties of 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the trial court for his appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN), J. //DK//