N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIsGARH AT BILASP (CG) WRIT PETITION (S) No‘ UHW /2010 WRIT PETITION u A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION O INDI / a n — L r ) Smt. Anjali Tiwari, W/o Shri Adity’ Kumar TiWari, aged about 52 years, occupation — ' Upper Divisio Teacher, Presently working as ecturer, _ Govt I Girls Highe Secondary School — Sarkanda Distt Bilaspur (CG .v VERsus 1. / State ofChhattisgarh, through — Secretary, Department of Schoo Education, Dau Kalan Singh BhaWan, Raipur (C.G.) /Distt. EdUcation ‘ Distt.Bilaspur (CG) 7’“ Ac& 3. ) 2. Officer, Joint Director (Treasury, Pension), Biiaspur (CG I UR F A; .pETITIONER l » y RESPONDENTS / . MQWW/m mm 1n zoo mm (Wu) mmm WW§WW éiwm SB : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Moha 05-08-2010 Shri A N. Bhakta, counsel f0:‘the petitioner. Shri Vinod Tekam, PaneH advance copy. Heard W ‘awyer for the State/respondents on Learned counsel appearing petitioner is entitled tobenefit oft she having passed Bi Ed. examinat cost it is submitted that the issue longer res integra and the same ha Supreme Court in the case of A 2009 (III) MPJR (SC) 59. It is furt taken a similar view in his o r W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. Learned attention of this Court to order da No.124 of 2009, wherein relying up in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) another Writ Appeal No.87/2009 consideration of the case for gr circular dated 21-09-1974 issued b verification of the facts pleaded in t Learned counsel for the re petitioner would also be considered for the petitioner submits that the o advance increments on account of on before her appointment at her own involved in the present petition is no s been finaliy decided by the Hon’ble Saxena vs. State of MP. & Ors., er submitted that this Court has also der dated 06-02—2009 passed ounsel for the petitioner further draws 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeal n the judgment of the Supreme Court and the order passed by this Court in directions have been issued for of two advance increments as per the State of Madhya l3radesh‘ after petition. pondents submits that case of the n the same lines. in s t a \N VCS‘J m W (Wu) mmw ammamim WWW ,Jg// Wim Wm In view of the statement made above, this petition is finaiiy disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner or grant of two advance increments as per circuiar dated 21‘094 974 is ed by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification ofthe facts plead d in the petition within a period of eight weeks from today. *Wm TUmanS \r Sd/ t t t 'Manindra Mohan Shrivastava ,. Judge