IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No. 1098 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION : APRIL 28, 2009 ANISH KUMAR ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr.RD Anand, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Ram Chander, Advocate, for respondents. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue the representation already made. Learned counsel for the respondents contends that as on date when the writ petition was filed, the petitioner was not entitled to the grant of second award of family pension, as he had already attained the age of 25 years and, therefore, the case would be covered under Regulation 219 of the Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961 (Part I). Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. April 28, 2009 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE