1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 80 OF 2007 M/s. Transport Traders Organisation India Pvt.Ltd. ... Applicant Vs 1. Union of India & anr. ... Respondents Ms. Shilpa Kapil for the Applicant. Mr. T.J. Pandian for the Respondents. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 1ST JULY, 2010. P.C. : 1. The Respondent has fairly annexed a copy of the contract. He further admits that the Special Conditions of Contract annexed to the affidavit-in-reply govern the rights of the parties. Clause 2 thereof expressly states that the provisions contained in clauses 63 and 64 of the General Conditions of Contract, 1999, pertaining to arbitration would apply only where the claim is less than or equal to twenty per cent of the value of the contract. 2 2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant, on taking instructions from the Applicant, whose Director is present in court, makes a statement that the Applicant will restrict its claim to twenty per cent of the contract value. Indeed, in the absence of such a statement, this application would have had to be dismissed. 3. In the circumstances, the application is allowed by directing the parties to comply with the provisions of clauses 63 and 64 of the General Conditions of Contract, 1999. This is subject to the claim in the arbitration being restricted to twenty per cent of the value of the contract. 4. The Arbitration Application, accordingly, stands disposed of.