IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.21621 of 2010 Date of Decision : December 06, 2010. Buta Singh .....Petitioner versus State Transport Commissioner, Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.J.S.Thind, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner alleges that neither the respondents are implementing the order dated 23.4.2003 (Annexure P-1) passed by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Punjab, nor they have decided his claim contained in the legal notice in terms of order dated 26.10.2009 (Annexure P-2) passed by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No.16299 of 2009. The records reveal that the petitioner had filed C.O.C.P.No.1293 of 2010 for non-compliance of the order dated 26.10.2009 passed by this Court. However, the said contempt petition was dismissed vide order dated 8.7.2010 (Annexure P-5) after observing that it is open to the petitioner to seek enforcement of the order dated 23.4.2003 C.W.P.No .21621 of 2010 2 passed by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Punjab, in terms of the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate application before the Tribunal who shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. December 06, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE