vEmUS Ni L RESPéNDETs ‘ 2; Collector, ‘ Dhamtari‘ Em hamtamC G ant" msh Kumax SahmAsslst overnment Middle ch9, _ G 0} District Dhamtan (C G ) 1 State of Chhattlsgarh, thx u Secretary Tribal Department, Mantralaya, Rmpur ' (CG ) _ ‘ * _ VDG) g a: Th5. Madhya. Pradesh Administrative Tribunai at Raipur vide intenim order dated 26,112001 directed to maintain mtus quo in mgarcl t0 the position of the petitjoaer as was prevaiHng on 15.102001, By virtue of tha inten‘m oxder the petitioner is conh'nuing at the original piace ofposting, B§ that as it may, with the passaga of time this pgtition has become iniinctuouS as pen'od of transfer is not applicable forever. At this point oftime, there is no question to examine the validity of the transfer order, However, the respondents are at hberty to pass appropriate order keeping in View the pnbiic interest and administrative exigeney, without insisting on compliance of the impugned transfer order. it is well settled principle of law that transfer is an incident of service and it is for the employer to decide as to where a particular otitioer/emoloyee be posteda keeping in View puhlic interest as well as administrative exigency. This Court has limited jurisdiotion to interfere in the transfer matter and this Court can interfere only in the case of proved maiaiide, non- competence of authority passing the transfer order and transfer order not being in conformity with the rules and regulations, in view ofthe aboves this petition stands oisposed of, No order as to costs. b) K” Sd/- Satish K. Agm'hotri i Judge l 1 "i