IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37363 of 2009 1. NARAYAN MISTRY S/O SRI KAMESHWAR MISTRY 2. KAMESHWAR MISTRY S/O SRI CHATTI LAL MISTRY, BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHHITNAMA, P.S. MANER, DISTRICT PATNA … PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 4.11.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners, the State and the informant. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 363, 365, 367 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The submission of the Counsel for the petitioner is that initially a sanha had been instituted by the informant without disclosing any names and thereafter six months later the present complaint was filed on 10.3.2008 for an occurrence dated 14.9.2007, which was sent under Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. to the police station for instituting a first information report. The complainant is not in a position to deny that initially the sanha did not contain the names of any accused persons. Under the circumstances, let the petitioners above named, who are in custody since 26.5.2009 and 29.6.2009 respectively, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Danapur in connection with Maner P.S.case 2 No.54 of 2008, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners and (ii) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner then their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )