CWP No. 1791 of 2008. 16.10. 2008 Present: Mr. J.L.Bhardwaj, counsel for the petitioners. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K.Verma, Dy. Advocate General, for respondent No.1. Mr. Vinod Thakur, counsel for respondents No. 2 and 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press this petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed, so also all the pending applications. Before we part, we would like to make atleast one observation that petitioner No.2 was member of H.P. B.Ed. Colleges Welfare Association, who had filed writ petition No. 760 of 2008 some time in the month of May 2008 and in spite of the same the petitioner No. 2 on oath had submitted in paragraph No. 19 of CWP No. 1791 of 2008 “that the petitioners have neither approached this Hon”ble Court nor Hon’ble Supreme Court of India for redressal of their grievances on the same or similar grounds except the present writ petition”. Further, we find that in affidavit dated 12.10.2008 and its annexures, which have been filed before us clearly indicate that petitioner No. 2 was member of the Welfare Association till the same was given up by letter dated 22nd August, 2008. Though as a member of the aforesaid Welfare Association the writ petition was filed on behalf of all members including petitioner No.2. This court has all the respect for the educationists, therefore, we take a milder view in the matter and we warn petitioner No.2 not to file affidavits, which could be proved wrong. ( Jagdish Bhalla ), Chief Justice. October 16, 2008. ( Kuldip Singh ), (Hem) Judge