IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.7395 of 1999 Between: Ch.Ramachandra Reddy S/o. Sri Baga Reddy, H.No.2-62, R/o.Chelmeda Village, Ramayampet Mandal, Medak District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1District Collector, Medak District at Sangareddy. 2Deputy Superintendent of Police, Toopran Sub Division, Medak District. 3Revenue Divisional Officer, Medak District at Sangareddy. 4Mandal Revenue Officer, Ramayampet, Ramayampet Mandal, Medak Dist. 5Superintending Engineer(Panchayatraj), Medak District at Sangareddy. 6The Divisional Panchayat Raj Officer, Medak District at Sangareddy. 7Mr.Bhikshapathi, Chelmeda village, Ramayampet Mandal, Medak Dist. 8Mr.P. Beeriah S/o Lingiah Chelmeda village, Rammayamopet Mandal, Medak District. amended as per the orders of the Hon'ble Court dt.7.4.99 9Mr.P. Konuiah S/o Lingiah Chelmeda Village, Ramayampet Mandal, Medak District. Amended as per the order of the Hon'ble Court dt.7.4.99 .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of Respondents 7 to 9 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and also violative of Article 300-A of Constitution of India and direct the Respondents 1,3 and 4 to investigate into the demolition of the house and loss of valuables and suitable compensate for the loss caused to the petitioner and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.D.DEVENDER RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following Order: Since none appeared for the petitioner on 12-08-2008, the writ petition was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, neither the counsel for the petitioner is present nor is there any representation on his behalf. Hence the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No costs. RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J Dt:21-08-2008 Usd To 1 The District Collector, Medak District at Sangareddy. 2 The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Toopran Sub Division, Medak District. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Medak District at Sangareddy. 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Ramayampet, Ramayampet Mandal, Medak Dist. 5 The Superintending Engineer(Panchayatraj), Medak District at Sangareddy. 6 The Divisional Panchayat Raj Officer, Medak District at Sangareddy. 7 Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 8 Two CD copies.