IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12130 of 2008 LALLAN PRASAD W i t h CWJC No.12420 of 2008 MADAN KUMAR GUPTA W i t h CWJC No.12552 of 2008 NAGENDRA ROY Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ----------- 3/ 26/9/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of B.S.N.L. The petitioners were candidates at the examination held for the post of Junior Accounts Officer. The allegations made of irregularities in the model answers vitiating the examinations led to the filing of C.W.J.C. No.6045/07 and C.W.J.C. No.13184/07 by certain other candidates, more particularly, Anil Kumar Madhukar and Shri Sanjay Kumar Gupta. In pursuance of certain orders of this Court their papers were re-evaluated by the corporation when they have been granted promotion acknowledging the mistake on the answers on the part of the authorities. If that be so, this Court would have expected the B.S.N.L. to accord similar treatment to the petitioner without the requirement of his filing a writ petition. Unfortunately this has not happened and the corporation - 2 - seeks to discriminate him only because them do not have an order of the court in their support. The writ applications are therefore disposed with directions to the B.S.N.L. to accord similar treatment to the petitioners, as given to the petitioners in C.W.J.C. No.6045/07 and 13184/07, subject to the performance of the petitioners upon re-evaluation. Let the same be done within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. KC ( Navin Sinha,J )