IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 3RD APRIL 2009 / 13TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 10352 of 2009(L) ------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- RENJITH JOHN, S/O.K.M.JOHNY, KOOTTUNKAL HOUSE, CHETHIMATTAM, PALAI P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.M.HEMALATHA SRI.MAHESH ANANDAKUTTAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, COCHIN. 2. THE REGISTRAR, COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, COCHIN. ADV. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAI,SC,COCHI U FOR R1, R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 10352 OF 2009 (L) ===================== Dated this the 3rd day of April, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that he is a B.Tech Student under the Cochin University of Science and Technology. 2. In the VIIth Semester Examination, petitioner failed in the paper Compressible Fluid Flow. Thereupon he applied for its revaluation. However, he also appeared in the supplementary examination held in November, 2008. The results of both revaluation and supplementary examination have not been declared. In the meanwhile, petitioner appears to have got an employment offer and wants to produce the certificate before the employer. Since the results are delayed, this writ petition has been filed praying for direction to the respondents to expedite the results. 3. I heard the standing counsel appearing for the respondents, who submits that the valuation of the supplementary examination held in November, 2008 has been completed and that after completing the procedural formalities, the same could be declared without delay. However, he points out that since the petitioner has also applied for revaluation of the WPC 10352/09 :2 : VIIth semester paper for which he failed, the revaluation has to be completed and results have to be declared and publication of the supplementary examination results can be done only thereafter. At this stage, counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not insisting on the declaration of the revaluation results, but wants only declaration of the results of the supplementary examination. I record this submission. 4. Taking into account the submission made by the standing counsel for the respondents that the valuation of the supplementary examination has already been completed and what remains is the completion of procedural formalities for declaration of results, it is directed that the University shall expedite the process and declare the results of the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 4 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. 5. In the meantime, in order to ensure that the petitioner do not lose the job opportunity that has been offered to him, it is directed that the University shall forthwith communicate to his employer the mark lists of the petitioner in the supplementary examination. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp