IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.977 of 2010 DR. MD. ATIQUE NADDAF . Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 03. 08.03.2011 Heard the parties. The grievance of the petitioner is for quashing of the first information report of Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 26 of 2009. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner was a valid medical practitioner whose clinic was raided with the result, petitioner sustained serious loss. Besides the above, it is submitted that the relevant papers were not verified before registering the case against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State submits that petitioner was found practicing a modern medical science to which he was not authorized. Notwithstanding the rival submission of the parties, the investigation of the aforesaid case be completed expeditiously without unnecessary delay. It is expected that the petitioner shall be cooperating with the investigation of the above case. With regard to other prayer of the petitioner for setting up an enquiry against the Civil Surgeon and for other reliefs, it will be open for him to take appropriate recourse of law. The writ application stands disposed of. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)