IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI TUESDAY, THE 25TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 34645 of 2008(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. C. RAJENDRAN PILLAI, S/O. CHELLAPPAN PILLAI, AGED 40 YEARS, MANACAD VEEDU, NEERAYIKODE, AYOOR.P.O, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. N. SAJEEVKUMAR, GIRIJA VILASAM, AYOOR.P.O, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.D.SAJEEV RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM, 2. THE TAHSILDAR, PATHANAPURAM TALUK, TALUK OFFICE, PATHANAPURAM 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, EDAMULACKAL, KOLLAM 4. GEORGE VARGHESE, THOTTUMKARAPUTHENVEEDU, MALAPERUR, KOTTUKKAL VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA BY GP SMT.SUDHA DEVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).34645/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 25th day of November, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioners claim to be the owners in possession of 65 sq.meters of land and 61 Ares of property in survey No.282/13-3 of Edamukkal Village stated to have been purchased under Exts.P1 and P3 sale deeds. Fourth respondent owns the property on the southern side of the property covered by Exts.P1 and P3 sale deeds. According to the petitioners, fourth respondent has no direct road access and he is using the petitioners' property for ingress and egress to his property. Petitioners therefore, sought for demarcation of the property and according to them, though the second respondent had directed the third respondent to complete the measurement, there is delay in completion at the instance of the fourth respondent. 2. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and taking note of the fact that Ext.P6 notice has been W.P.(C).34645/2008 2 issued by the Taluk Surveyor, I am of the view that there must be expeditious completion of the procedure as proposed under Ext.P6. 3. In the result, writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to see that measurement of the property as originally proposed under Ext.P6 is completed at the earliest. This shall be done after notice to the fourth respondent also, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Copy of the writ petition along with the copy of the judgment shall be produced by the petitioner before the second respondent for compliance. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs