IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 29TH MAGHA 1930 Bail Appl..No. 420 of 2009() ---------------------------- (CASES REREGISTERD AND NUMBERED BY CBCID, SIG-2 THIRUVANANTHAPURAM) (CRIME NO.202/2008) PETITIONER/ACCUSED -------------------------------------- FENI FELIX, AGED 24, S/O.FELIX, CELESTE VEEDU, MAMBAZHAKKUNNU, MANIKANDESWARAM P.O., NETTAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.P.UDAYABHANU RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT -------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DY.S.P. CRIME BRANCH, SIG-2, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.K.SURESH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K. HEMA, J. --------------------------------------------------- Bail Appl. No. 420 of 2009 --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of February, 2009. ORDER Petition for anticipatory bail. 2. Petitioner is implicated as accused in connection with the crime registered in respect of “Total four You” scam. In six cases, he is already arrested and bail is granted. According to petitioner, immediately on execution of bail bond, petitioner is being implicated in some case or other and thereby his release is being prevented. Therefore, a request was made to get verified through the learned Public Prosecutor whether petitioner is an accused in any other cases, which are registered so far, in connection with “Total four You” scam. 3. Accordingly, learned Public Prosecutor was directed to verify whether petitioner is accused in any of the cases in which he is so far arrested, out of the 21 cases which are already registered and being investigated into by CBCID. Learned Public Prosecutor, on instruction submitted that petitioner is accused only in 6 cases, out of the 21 such cases, which are already registered. Petitioner is already released on bail. Police has no intention to arrest him in any other cases, which are already registered and he will not be implicated in such cases. These submissions are recorded. In the light of the above submission, there is no apprehension of arrest of petitioner and hence no ground exists to grant anticipatory bail. Petition is disposed of accordingly. K. HEMA, JUDGE. Krs.