IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Order on the Bail cancellation application. CRIMINAL SIDE (1) Bail Cancellation Application No.3 of 2010 State of Uttarakhand ..….Applicant Versus Prashant Malik …..Opposite party (2) Bail Cancellation Application No.4 of 2010 State of Uttarakhand ..….Applicant Versus Satyaveer Singh …….Opposite party (3) Bail Cancellation Application No.6 of 2010 State of Uttarakhand ..….Applicant Versus Avinash @ Mohit …….Opposite party Dated: September 17, 2010 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. In all these bail cancellation applications, the applicants are related to the common incident and the matter to be decided in these applications is also same, hence all these bail applications are being disposed of by this common order. Heard Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State/applicant and Mrs. Pushpa Joshi, Advocate for the respondents. By way of these bail cancellation applications, the State/applicant has prayed to cancel the bail of the respondents-accused Prashant Malik, Satyaveer Singh and Avinash @ Mohit granted by this Court vide orders dated 2.12.2009 and 30.3.2010, respectively, in Case Crime No.16 of 2008, relating to offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 302, 324 and 504 of IPC (S.T. No.332 of 2008), registered with Police Station GRP Laksar, District Haridwar. Learned Addl. GA for the State has failed to show any ground in support of his bail cancellation applications and whatever ground has been stated by him, that were already considered by this Court at the time of granting the bail to the respondents-accused. As such, the bail cancellation applications are misconceived and are liable to be rejected. The bail cancellation applications are accordingly rejected. (Dharam Veer, J.) 17.9.2010 RG