IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 494 OF 2009 DATTA K. KUDCHADKAR ... Petitioner Versus THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF PRISONS PANAJI AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Nigel Da Costa Frias, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S. Bandodkar, Addl. Government Advocate for the Respondents Coram:- N. A. BRITTO & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 28th January, 2010 P.C.: Heard. 2. This petition is by the petitioner who is a Jailor. 3. We have perused the Affidavit in Reply filed by the Respondent. From the said Affidavit we find that several disciplinary inquires were initiated against the petitioner,from time to time which were never taken to its logical conclusion. 4. The petitioner was suspended from 3.8.2006, but that order of suspension has now been revoked from 30.7.2009 and since then, the petitioner is being paid his regular salary. During the suspension period the Petitioner was being paid subsistence allowance. Whether the petitioner would be entitled to full wages during the said period of suspension is a matter which can be considered independently, by the authority concerned.The petitioner is always at liberty to make a representation in that regard to the Inspector General of Prisons and if such a representation is made by the petitioner to the I.G. Prisons, the same shall be disposed of by him within a period of four weeks. 5. Presently, two charge-sheets have been issued against the petitioner and inquires are being conducted against him. Shri Bandodkar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent upon instructions, submits that said two inquiries, will be completed by the Government within a period of six months. We accept the said statement. 6. In case the petitioner is entitled to be promoted, his case can be considered only in accordance with the Rules. 7. In the light of the above observations and directions, we dispose of the petition, with no orders as to costs. N. A. BRITTO, J. U. D. SALVI, J. ap/-