IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.Rev. (T) No. 62/2008 Decided on:27.4.2011 _____________________________________________ Smt. Shankutla Devi. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. B.C. Negi, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. for respondent No.1. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Asstt. Solicitor General of India for respondent No.2. None for respondents No.3 to 6. _____________________________________________________ Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). It is jointly represented by the learned counsel for the parties that respondents No.4 and 5 are more than 25 years of age. Consequently, in view of rule 54 (c) (ii) of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, they are not entitled to family pension. Accordingly, respondents No.1 and 2 are directed to disburse family pension, which was being 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 disbursed to respondents No.4 and 5, proportionately to petitioner and respondent No.3. In view of above directions, the petition is disposed of, so also the pending application, if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 27.4.2011 *awasthi*