1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application No.7960 of 2007 In Civil Application No.4555 of 2007 In Letters Patent Appeal Stamp No.8152 of 2007 In Writ Petition No.5148 of 2005 (Decided on 5-2-2007) (Sati Samat Bahuudeshiya Shikshan Sanstha, Yavatmal, and another v. The Divisional Social Welfare Officer, Amravati, and others) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Shri P.S. Patil, Advocate for Applicants/Appellants. Shri M.R. Joshi, Advocate for R- 3. CORAM : K.J. Rohee & R.C. Chavan, JJ. DATE : 10th December, 2007 Civil Application No.7960 of 2007 : Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The application for condonation of delay may be corrected by deleting the words, as prayed for. Civil Application No.7960 of 2007 is disposed of. Civil Application No.4555 of 2007 : Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The order under challenge was passed by this Court on 5-2-2007, whereas the Letters Patent Appeal is preferred on 5-5-2007 2 along with an application for condonation of delay. It is contended by the appellants that the counsel for the appellants communicated the decision of the Court in the last week of February, 2007. Thereafter, the meeting of the Management was called in the second week of March, 2007 and it was decided therein to challenge the order. It may be noted that no date of meeting is mentioned in the application. Apart from this, no document as regards the alleged meeting is placed on record. The second ground for delay is that the wife of the President was suffering from Spondylitis and was required to be admitted in the hospital for treatment. However, no document as regards the ailment of the wife of the President is placed on record. The third and the last ground for delay is the illness of the old mother of the President. However, in that respect also, no document is placed on record. Thus, none of the grounds given in the application for condonation of delay is supported by any document. Hence, we are not satisfied that there is sufficient ground for condonation of delay. Civil Application No.4555 of 2007 is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE pdl