IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20867 of 2009 KIRAN KUMARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 23.7.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner has been alleged for using a forged mark sheets in obtaining the job of Panchayat Sikshaka which according to the learned counsel is not corroborated by the Intermediate Council. Petitioner is a woman who also lost her job. It is conceded that the Intermediate Council is approached only no reply has come from there. Allegation was taken on administrative side and finding the same true her selection has been cancelled. Thus I find it not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. I find no similarity in the case of co- accused Santosh Kumar Mandal who has been allowed regular bail. The application for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner is rejected. However the petitioner shall surrender before the Court and seek regular bail which shall be considered on its own merit, without being prejudiced by the present order of dismissal. (Mandhata Singh,J.) A.Kumar