1 wp7276.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No. 7276 of 2010 Mr. Ramkrishna D Pataskar ..Petitioner v/s. M/s. Thakur Savadekar & Company Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondents Mr. P.V. Dube for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Patwardhan for the respondents. CORAM:- B.R. GAVAI, J. DATED :- FEBRUARY 22 2011. P.C. By way of present Petition, the Petitioner challenges the order dated 1st January, 2010 vide which the Application filed by the present Petitioner for review of the order dated 17th August, 2009 came to be rejected. 2. The Petitioner was seeking a review of the order dated 17th August, 2009 vide which the Application filed by the present Petitioner for framing additional issues came to be rejected. While rejecting the said Application, the Court had noticed that the issues were framed on 22nd June, 2004 and 2 wp7276.10.sxw thereafter the Petitioner had filed an Application for recasting the issues. The same was also rejected on 25th January, 2005. A similar Application was made below exhibit 66 which is also rejected on 9th June, 2008. The 3rd application came to be rejected on 17th August, 2009. The learned trial Court, therefore, found that the Petitioner was interested in prolonging the matter rather than proceeding with the suit. 3. The perusal of three orders dated 25th January, 2005, 7th July, 2008 and 17th August, 2009 would reveal that the Petitioner has been making application after application for the same purpose. No justification is given in the Petition as to why the Petitioner was silent since 25th January, 2005. 4. In that view of the matter, no perversity is noticed in the impugned order passed by the learned trial Court to warrant interference under extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Rejected. (B.R. GAVAI, J)