CR No. 7991 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 7991 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:- 8.12.2010 Kohar Singh and another ......petitioners vs. Khazan Singh and ors ......respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: - Mr. Ajay Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners HEMANT GUPTA, J (ORAL) Challenge in the present petition is to an order passed by learned trial Court on 26.8.2010 whereby the vendee of the plaintiff- respondent No.1 was permitted to continue with the suit by substitution. Kharait Lal-respondent No.2 purchased the property in dispute from the plaintiff vide a registered sale deed dated 29.5.2009. On the basis of purchase, he filed an application for substitution in terms of Order 22 Rule 10 Code of Civil Procedure which has been allowed on 26.8.2010 by learned trial Court vide the order impugned in the revision petition. Since, the plaintiff has transferred his rights during the pendency of the suit in favour of Kharait Lal. Such transferee has been rightly impleaded as an assignee of the plaintiff. The argument raised by learned counsel for the petitioners is that the plaintiff has sought injunction which is in personal cause of action is not tenable. A transferee from the plaintiff shall be entitled to protect the rights as are vested on the plaintiff including the rights to claim ad interim injunction. The rights of the transferee are not less than what a transferor CR No. 7991 of 2010 -2- had in the property. In view of the said fact, I do not find any patent illegality or irregularity in the orders passed by the learned trial Court which may warrant any interference in the revisional jurisdiction of this Court. Dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 8.12.2010 preeti