{1} wp882110.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.8821 OF 2010 Madhav s/o Sheshrao Gajai Petitioner Versus The Secretary, Hanumant Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Chondi, Tq.Udgir, Dist.Latur & others Respondents Mr.S.G.Rudrawar, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.R.J.Godbole, advocate for respondent no.1. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 28 th February, 2011 PER COURT: 1 Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2 By this petition, the petitioner has impugned the judgment and order dated 10.09.2008, passed by the School Tribunal, whereby an appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed. The petitioner had challenged his termination by way of the appeal. 3 I have heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the impugned judgment. The Tribunal, after having considered the entire material on record, has observed that the appellant has prepared bogus/forged documents relied upon by {2} wp882110.odt him in support of his case. That apart, the Tribunal has also observed that one cannot claim deemed permanency under Section 5(2) of the M.E.P.S. Act, 1977, unless it is proved that he was duly selected in the manner prescribed. After considering the entire material on record, the Tribunal has recorded its finding that the petitioner was not duly appointed in the manner prescribed and, therefore, he cannot claim the benefit of permanency. 4 Considering that there is sufficient material on record to sustain the findings of fact recorded by the Tribunal, I see no reason/ground to interfere with the impugned judgment, in exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 5 Hence, the Petition is dismissed. D.B.BHOSALE JUDGE adb/wp882110