IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINIAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 151 of 2008 (M/B) Akram @ Chanda & another …………Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …………..Respondents. Sri D.C.S. Rawat, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri Tanuj Semwal, Asst. Government Advocate, present for the State. Hon’ble Prafulla, C. Pant, J. Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Learned counsel for the parties are present. (2) Sri Tanuj Semwal, Asst. Government Advocate, makes a statement that after completion of investigation no offence is said to have been made out against the petitioners Akram @ Chanda and Shahnaj @ Kallo. A short counter affidavit has also been filed by the Investigating Officer stating that after completion of investigation Final Report has been submitted on 29.04.2008. (3) In view of the above development, this writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous with the observation that the interim order dated 26.02.2008, passed by this Court, shall continue till Final Report is received by the court concerned. (Stay Vacation Application No. 1042 of 2008, also stands dismissed). (Dharam, Veer, J.) (Prafulla, C. Pant, J.) 12.06.2008 NS