IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.20144 of 1999 Between: P.Jaipal Reddy S/o Penta Reddy, R/o Kandi, Sangareddy Mandal, Medak District. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Primary Agriculture Co-operative Society Ltd Rep By its President, Kandi, SangaReddy Mandal, Medak District. 2 The Divisional Cooperative Officer, Sanga Reddy, Medak District. 3 The District Cooperative Officer, Medak at Sanga Reddy. 4 The Commissioner For Cooperation and Register of Cooperative Socities, Government of A.P., Gruhakalpa, MJ Road, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ order or direction more particularly one in the Nature of Writ of Mandamus in not paying the petitioner 's salary for the period from May, 97 to 10/9/98 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14 and 21 of constitution of India apart from being violative of principles of Natural justice and consequently declare the inaction of 1st Respondent in not obeying the orders passed by the orders of the 2nd Respondents dt.11/2/99 vide RC.NO.471/97-C and the orders of the 3rd Respondents in RC-NO.666/97-C dt. 1/121/98 as illegal arbitrary and constitutional apart from being violative of principles of natural justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.NANDIGAM KRISHNA RAO Counsel for Respondents: MR.P.KISHORE RAO The Court made the following: Order: Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed before this court a copy of the proceedings dated 20-04-2000, issued in Rc.No. /99-2000, by the General Manager/Member Convenor of District Cooperative Central Bank Ltd., Medak, at Sangareddy and submitted that in view of the said proceedings no further adjudication is necessary on merits in this writ petition. Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is closed. __________________________ JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY. August 14, 2008 MRR