IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36519 of 2010 JALALUDDIN ANSARI, son of Late Amnunlal Ansari Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/- 28.10.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the misuse of privilege of bail for a period of about 7 years, the petitioner is remained in jail custody since 29.06.2010, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned F.T.C.-II, Chapra in Baniapur P.S. Case No.113 of 92 (G. R. No. 2269 of 1992 and Sessions Trial No. 320 of 1994), subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any 2 change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, and (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The trial court is directed to conclude the trial positively within a period of six months since the occurrence is of the year 1992. Ashwini/- ( Anjana Prakash, J. )