(1) WP. 2791.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2791 OF 2010 Keshav Punjaba Kadam and others .. Petitioners VERSUS Dattatraya Eknath Kadam .. Respondents Mr. Shivaji T. Shelke, Advocate for the Petitioners ... CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 21ST JUNE, 2010 ORAL ORDER:- 1] Heard learned counsel. The impugned order rendered by the learned Civil Judge on 15.3.2010 allows the application of the plaintiff to add parties. The petitioners are original defendants. According to the petitioners, the addition of third party ought not to have been granted. The petitioners have not shown any prejudice caused due to addition of the third party. The proposed third party did not object their joining the suit. It was the contention of the petitioners that the third parties by name Vimalbai and Balasaheb may file a separate suit and their addition in the same suit was not necessary. The trial Court seems to have allowed the joining of the third parties at the instance of (2) WP. 2791.2010 the plaintiff in order to avoid multiplicity of litigation. It is only a discretionary order. The petitioners cannot claim that they will be prejudiced due to joining of such third party which, according to themselves, have some claim because the properties are also recorded in the names of such third party. The Petition is devoid of substance and therefore is dismissed. Sd/- [V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp