IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 17TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 26TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 33695 of 2008(J) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- SHEREEF V JUNIOR CLERK, MAKKARAPARAMBA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, LTD.NO. 576, MAKKARAPARAMBA, P.O.MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.N.MOHANAN SMT. REMYA C.J RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, MALAPPURAM. 2. MAKKARAPARAMBA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.576, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY MAKKARAPARAMBA ,P.O.MALAPPURAM. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/11/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Rs/ Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J. ================================== W.P.(C)No.33695 of 2008 ================================== Dated this the 17th day of November, 2008. JUDGMENT Learned Government Pleader appears for the first respondent. Having regard to the nature of the directions being issued hereunder, notice to the second respondent is dispensed with, preserving its right to move for review of this judgment, if aggrieved. 2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the decision contained in Ext.P3 communication whereby, he has been asked to show cause against the proposal to remove him from service. This has been done on the basis of audit objection. Therefore, the fate of any procedure, following Ext.P3, is beyond any doubt. But the petitioner is entitled to place his contentions before the competent authority. Ext.P2, being an audit objection and because its WPC33695/08 -:2:- contents lead to adverse further consequences for the petitioner, this writ petition is ordered directing that the petitioner will be at liberty to move the first respondent and seek appropriate relief. To enable him to move the first respondent and seek appropriate orders, it is further directed that the petitioner shall not be removed from service on the basis of the impugned decision within three months from now within which time the first respondent will dispose of the matter finally. Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, Judge. sl.