mm (Wu) WWW ammm WW WW %?ai1%mm WWW SB : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE. PRITINKER DIWAKER 20.10.2010 . Shri Jitendra Gu§ta, coun for the petitioxzers. Shxi Vivek Shanna, P.L. for Stats. Counsel for the petitioner u'bmits that the petitioner is entitled to benefif of two advance increments on account of he having passed B.T.I. examination before his appointment at his own cost. It is submitted that th issue involved in the present petition is no longer res integra the same has been finally decided by the Hon’ble Suprem Court in the case of Asha 09 (iIIyMPJR {so} 59. It is further submitted that this Court has also taken a similar View in its order dated 6 2.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No. 6257/ 2008. Counsel for the peti oner further submits that the order dated 29.4.2010 passed i VWrit Appeal NO. 12412009, vvherein relying upon the judgme t of the Supreme Court. in the order passed by this Court 0 Saxena Vs. State of MI. 85 Ors. case of Asha Saxena (supra) and in another Writ Appeal No. 87 2009, directions have been issued for consideration of the ase for grant of two advance increments as per circular dated 1.9. 1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after veritica 'on of the facts pleaded in‘the pedtion. Counsel for the State sub its that case of the penny wouldalso be considered on . the me lines. k / _ W . / , $6 / ‘%0\‘9.\$$ e e $8§§°a gt s 1 e d e \ \ XIIHG—78 mm (ma) mmfaw ammm WWW mmewm $affcmm In View of above, the pe1'iti0n is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authmities to decide the claim of the :e increments as per circular tate of Madhya Pradesh after the petition Within a period of Sd/— Pritinker Diwaker Judge BET W, m’ W I petitioner for grant of two advan ‘ dated 21.9.1974 issued by the S veriiication of the facts p1eaded in eight weeks from today. . "J V