9" * <? IGH CGURT OF éHHATTISGARH AT BILA5PUR WRIT PETiTlaN {S} N6. 1&28 b“? 2G09 :1, Narayan Banwas§Age about 59 yeays, Heaé Master S/o Shri RamsaiBaj‘Iwasi, R/G Govt $chem, Dhamtar§ Bégck Dhamtari mat. Bhamtari (Ga) ’ Dev La§ Nis‘nadéga abcut 5? years, UDJ. s/o $hri Phiratu Ram Nishad ‘R/o Govt. Middie Schsoi, Khisera, Bioek Magarisd, Disti. Dhamtari (C.G.) . Sm‘t. Rekha Thakua' Age abaut 53 years, U,D.T‘ W/o Shri Rajkumar Thakur, R/o Manj‘ha Para, Kanker Distt. Kanker (C.G.) Rajkumar Thakur Age about 54 years, U.D.T. S/e Late Shri Brijendra’ 'Thakur R/o Manjha Para, Kanker Distt. — Kanker(C.G.) ’ Ramsajivan Sinha Age about 50 years, U.D.T. S/o Shri Purru Ram 'Sinha, R/o Singérbhat, Kanker Distt.Kanker(c.G.) ’ 6. Nohar Singh Chhidaura, Age about 61 years, Head Master S/o Late Shri Sunday Singh R/e Govt. Primary School, Baiiyara», Black Dhamtari, DisttDhamiarHQG.) ‘ VER$US ‘ . State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Thmugh: The Secretary, Education Bepartment, D.K-.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G’.) . District Education Officer, imamtari, Distt Dhamtari (C.G.) I ‘ District Educatiora Offécer, Kanker, mett. Karake (C.G._) ‘ I 4. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Depai’tment, Kanker Distt. Kanker (C.G.) elfare r WRIT PETITION, UNDER ARTICLE 226 CF IHE CONS‘HTUTION OF iNDiA ‘SB: Hen’ble §hn Satieh K. Agmhetri, i. ' PfESenE: $hri Arun SaafGoV'emment Advocate for the State/fespondente. shri Somkant Verma, AdVocai'e for the petitioner. / ORAL ORDER (Passed on 27th day of March, 2009, ) RESPONDENTS . With the consent of ihe pamegthe matter is heero finaiiy. . The petitioners. were appointed as Assistant Teachers on a fixed pay of Rs. 100/—. After campletion' of theirTrestéeciive’prébatien period, they were granted reguia! pay scaie. r 2. Learned counsei éppeai‘ing for thQeetitioners submits that’the issue invoived in the case asto t, ti‘oners r entil r c x z H . ‘ . .V _ . r W PeTmoNERs 3 1 is wheher the ueii ae ted to 9 reguiar pay s‘caie w.e.f. the date initia! appointment or after campletion of prcbation pericd‘ , The issue invowed, herein was cansidered by te Madhya Pradesh State iistre Trib, Jalr in 0A. No. 2145/89 (Madkant az§u and 56 thars s. stae MP. a: o£hers), wherein it as e te imilarly tuated teachers are ntit3e£i t9 egmar pay ale w‘es, te date of initl ppointment. ‘ihe atter was; iaken u? ta Hn’bie Sum‘eme ort if! Speciai Lee Petitien (Civii) N6. 92/93. The said petitisn a5 di$missed by, th en‘bi Seme am uphoidin tiie deisio e’ he Tritinl ‘o the effec hat the Teachf/Aesi5tant Teachers are entitie to zregiar pay scae from x h AdmnaiW una; bagu hu Y o V t ef w hm! ihat h s si e r sc f h ia a m o Cu al 68 w e He upr Ci g cn f t ua t t t es d u i dew 0f iniiiai appointmen, . ieamed counsel appearin for the eetitioner aiso suite tt thi g s bm ha s our, while considering the sae isue in Amer Sei Ra & hers . Stte of Chhattisgai’h . Others, {WPI (S) . 725/2008] by Order dad 0..2006, ilod the §etitiers to me a representaiie aiong h y of the ‘etitien a annexsihin a rod of ten days, raisi a! their grievance ad ih turn he cncemed respondent wa d p je i at de r h ni .Aen e ke o ra i th a ne r ed e he a ce aw/ot‘s i n i from the date o receipt of th representatio. in View of the foregoing; this petition is dispensed of. No order asto (5‘) ¢O$t5 . e directe to decide the reresentatien in an obctive manner Within a perod 30 days from the at of eceipt of te represetaton. cordigw, th petitioners are granted liberty to ma a representatin ising ai eir grievances nd in turn, the concerd espondent is direct to dcide t representtion, if any, in accordan with in‘i avm merits, withi a period o 8 weeks i Sd/- :Satish K. Agnihotri J, v Judge J [Li i Amit g t ct m s m ot Vs a & N0 4 te 109 awe 0h ak n wit cop p nd arewt pei ng t s n t a f e n .