IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21588 of 2010 1.PRAMOD YADAV son of Domi Yadav Resident of village Kumhar Laur, P.S. and Dist. Supaul …….. Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR O.P. ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Shaheen Begum, A.P.P. -------------- 2 14.7.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for offence under section 498 A of the Indian Penal Code as also ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. In the first information report Vide Annexure-1, the petitioner is named as accused being husband of the informant/complainant and the allegation of demand of dowry and torture is against him. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as a matter of fact the present case has been filed by way of retaliation of the matrimonial suit filed by the petitioner on 17.10.2008. The informant having learnt about the said proceeding filed the complaint case on 17.2.2009 which finally gave rise to FIR vide annexure-1. It is further stated that in the back ground of the case, absolutely there is no possibility of restoration of matrimonial relationship between the petitioner and the informant. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four - 2 - weeks from today, the above named petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Supaul in connection with G. R. No. 803 of 2009 arising out of Supaul P.S. Case no. 186 of 2009, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J. ) M.Rahman