Civil Revision No. 4589 of 2009 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 4589 of 2009 Date of decision : 7.5.2010 State of Haryana ....Petitioner Versus Roshan Lal and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. Maloo Chahal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Batra, Advocate for the respondents. S. D. ANAND, J. The petitioner has applied for the invalidation of the impugned order dated 10.6.2009 vide which its plea for the leave of the Court to adduce additional evidence was negatived. It is apparent from the impugned order itself that the plaintiffs-respondents closed his evidence on 22.12.2006. Thereafter seven effective opportunities including two last opportunities were afforded to the defendant-petitioner to conclude its evidence and it is thereafter only that the evidence of the defendant/petitioner was ordered to be closed by the Court on 23.7.2007. The plea for additional evidence came to be filed on 10.3.2009. The order dated 23.7.2007 directing closure of evidence never ever came to be challenged by defendant-petitioner. It has, thus, attained finality. These facts weighed with the learned Trial Court in negativing the plea for additional evidence. Civil Revision No. 4589 of 2009 -2- **** For the very reasons noticed by the learned Trial Court, I do not find any force in the petition which shall stand dismissed accordingly. May 07, 2010 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE Civil Revision No. 4589 of 2009 -3- ****