IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 5216 of 2008. Decided on: 06.10.2010. __________________________________________________________ Narotam Dutt Dhiman. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 4. None for respondent No.5. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): There shall be a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the case of the petitioner in view of the averments made in Annexure A-3, dated 14.3.1998, within a period of four weeks after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. The respondent No.2 shall pass a speaking order. 2. In view of the observations made hereinabove, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. October 06, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?