IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1863 of 2010 Kanhai Mahto, S/o Late Jetu Prasad Mahto, R/o Mohalla-Mirchai Bari, near State Bank of India, Kathihar, P.S.-Kathihar, P.O.- Samaharnalay, District-Kathihar. …….. Petitioner. Versus 1. State of Bihar through Principal Secretary –cum-Commissioner, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar. 2. Sri Ajay Nayak, S/o Not known, Principal Secretary –cum- Commissioner, Water Resources Department, Sinchai Bhavan, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. Sri Om Prakash Mochi, S/o Not known, Deputy Secretary , Water Resources Department, Sinchai Bhavan, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4. Sri Indrajeet Saxena, S/o not known, Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Purnia. 5. Sri Deen Dayal Singh, S/o not known, Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division, Kathihar. ………….. Opposite Parties/Contemnors. ----------- 3. 30.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel appearing for the State submitted that the in view of the Hon’ble court’s order dated 13.10.2009, the claim of the petitioner has been considered as stated in paragraph 4 to the show case and order as contained in Memo No. 516 dated 20.04.2010 was communicated to the petitioner vide Annexure-B to the show cause. Since the order has been complied with, this contempt application need not proceed. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order as contained in Annexure-B is not correct. As such it will be open for the petitioner to assail his claims appropriately and bring it to the notice of the concerned authority indicating specific details of such claims according to law. 2 In view of the above contention, this M.J.C. application stands disposed of. Sujit (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)