IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 4524 of 2011 Date of decision: 27.7.2011 Balwinder Singh and others … Petitioners versus M/s Guiding Force … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners ... ARVIND KUMAR, J: The present petitioners are the defendants in the suit for specific performance and permanent injunction, titled M/s Guiding Force v. Balwinder Singh and others. Their application seeking amendment in para 5 of the preliminary objections and para 2 of the reply on merits, in the written statement has dismissed vide impugned order dated 15.6.2011 passed by the Civil Judge(Senior Division), Fatehgarh Sahib. Hence, this revision. Heard. The learned Court below though has given details of the judgments referred to by the counsel for the parties but has no where observed as to what is the proposed amendment that has been sought in the written statement and how the said proposed amendment will make out a new case. There is absolutely no discussion about the facts of the case and as such, the order under challenge deserves to be set aside. In view of this, the present revision is allowed, impugned order is set aside and the case is remanded to the Court concerned to pass a fresh order keeping in view the facts of he case, purely on merits, in accordance with law without being influenced by any of the observations made herein. July 27, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) JS JUDGE