IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17557 of 2009 1. AJAY SINGH @ AJAY KUMAR SINGH 2. ARJUN SINGH 3. MAHA SINGH 4. RAUSHAN KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 07.09.2009 Heard both sides. Petitioners, who are four in numbers, have applied for anticipatory bail in a case instituted under Sections 147, 148,149,341, 323, 324 and 504 of the Penal Code and later on Section 307 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is counter case also lodged by the petitioner no.1, namely, Ajay Singh @ Ajay Kumar Singh. It is next contended that he too received injuries almost identical in nature. Referring to the impugned order it is contended that the police, in course of investigation, did not find the case true under Section 307 of the Penal Code, and as such, they were granted bail during the investigation. Subsequently Charge-sheet has been filed under Section 307 of the Penal Code, and as such, the apprehension. It is next contended that the place of occurrence admittedly is the ‘Darwaja’ of the accused persons. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is persuaded to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of 04 2 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sakra P.S.Case no. 294/2008, Trial No. 3308 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)