IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 835 of 1998 Between: 1 Smt. Suruchi Chand, W/o.Late Rameshchand, Rep. by its G.P.A.Holder 2 Smt. Saloni Jhavari Bee Saloni, Chand, D/o. Late Ramesh Chand, Rep. by its G.P.A.Holder 3 Miss Bhivanichand, D/o. Ramesh Chand, Rep. by its G.P.A.Holder 4 Sri Jayant Reddy, S/o. Agi Reddy, R/o. 3-4-676/10, Basant Colony, Hyderabad. 5 Sri B Janardhan reddy, S/o. Ananth Reddy, R/o. 8-2-696/1/L Road No. 12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad. 6 Sri S Ganesh Reddy, S/o. Narasimha Reddy, R/o. Asmangadh, Malakpet, Hyderabad. 7 Sri M Vijaya Reddy, S/o. Jagapathi reddy, R/o. 2-2-647/A/29. Saibaba Nagara, Nallakunta, Hyderabad. ... PETITIONERS AND 1 The District Collector, Hyderabad 2 The Special Officer and Competent Authority, ULC, Hyderabad. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Asifnagar, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of 'Writ of Mandamus' declaring the action of the 1st and 3rd respondents in locking the gate and not allowing the petitioners to enter the property land in Survey Nos. 116/1, 117/1,117/2,118,119,120/1, 120/2,120/3,121 and 122 of Guddimalkapur , Karvan Sahu, Golconda Mandal, Hyderabad as arbitrary and illegal and fore-bear the authorities i.e. Respondents No. 1 to 3 from interfering with the possession of the petitioners over the extent of 6 acres of land in survey Nos.116/1, 117/1,117/2,118,119,120/1,120/2,120/3,121 and 122 situated at Guddimalkapur Village, Karvan Sahu, Golconda Mandal, Hyderabad. Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.A.NARASIMHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO.835 of 1998 ORDER: Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition has become infructuous and that it may be dismissed as such. In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. 9-12-2004 Gsn. To 1 The District Collector, Hyderabad 2 The Special Officer and Competent Authority, ULC, Hyderabad. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Asifnagar, Hyderabad 4 Two C.Cs to the GP for Revenue, High Court Buildings, High Court of AP, Hyderabad. 5 Two C.D. Copies.