- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. jmi SUIT NO.713 OF 1982. Alliance Synthetics Pvt. Ltd. ..Plaintiffs. vs. M/s.Aruna Mills Ltd. ..Defendants. .... Ms.Gunjan Shah, i/b. Arvind Rathod & Co., for Plaintiffs. None for Defendants. .... CORAM CORAM CORAM: S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 13TH APRIL, 2009 : 13TH APRIL, 2009 : 13TH APRIL, 2009. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . By a detailed order of this Court dated 4th April 2009, this Court has recorded that the plaintiffs have avoided proceeding with the suit from time to time. However, as a last chance, Office was directed to give notice to the Advocate for the plaintiffs as well as the plaintiffs at their last known address shown in the Court records, informing them that the suit is kept for dismissal on 13th April 2009. Accordingly, the Court Office has sent a notice to the plaintiffs at their last known address and also to the Advocates for the plaintiffs. 2. The Court Office has submitted its compliance report dated 9th April 2009 informing the Court that the notice issued to the Advocate for the plaintiffs has been duly served and the notice issued to the plaintiffs - 2 - has been returned with remarks "The said office does not exist on the given address." The learned Advocate who has appeared for the plaintiffs after receiving notice from the Court Office, states that the plaintiffs have not contacted them since the year 2006 and have not come forward to give them any instructions in the matter. 3. In view thereof, it is clear that the plaintiffs are not interested in prosecuting the suit any further. The suit is therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. [S.J.KATHAWALLA, [S.J.KATHAWALLA, [S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.] J.] J.]