IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO. 32 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 117 OF 2010 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD., ... Applicant Versus SHRI. JAYANT K. NAROJI AND ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Amey Kakodkar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. S. S. Kakodkar, Advocate for the Respondents. Coram:- F. M. REIS, J. Date:- 23rd November, 2011 P.C. Heard Shri Kakodkar, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant and Shri S. S. Kakodkar, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents. 2. This is an application for recording of the submission by the learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant-original Respondent to the effect that there was a breach to the terms of the policy issued in favour of the Respondent no.1 by the Applicant as the Applicant-Insurance Company came to know that the vehicle which met with an accident was being used on hire as a taxi at the relevant time. Admittedly, there is no foundation to that effect in the written statement filed by the Applicant. But, however, considering that whilst passing the impugned Judgment dated 14.10.2011, the Applicant has been permitted to file an application for amendment of their written statement, the Applicant would be entitled to raise the aforesaid contentions also in the proposed application for amendment sought to be filed by the Applicant. 3. Subject to the above, the Application stands disposed of. F. M. REIS, J. arp/*