IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7955 of 2010 KISHUNDEO SINGH SON OF LATE RAMESHWAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- HEWATPUR, P.O. & P.S.- GARKHA, DISTRICT- SARAN Versus 1. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA THROUGH THE CHAIRMAN, STATE BANK OF INDIA, CENTRAL OFFICE, MADAM KAMA ROAD, MUMBAI 2. CHAIRMAN, STATE BANK OF INDIA, CENTRAL OFFICE, MADAM KAMA ROAD, MUMBAI 3. DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER ( P.P.G) STATE BANK OF INDIA, CORPORATE CENTRE, MUMBAI 4. CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, ZONAL HEAD OFFICER, J.C. ROAD, PATNA 5. ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (P.P.G.) STATE BANK OF INDIA, J.C. ROAD, PATNA 6. STATE BANK OF INDIA NAGARA BRANCH, THROUGH THE BRANCH MANAGER, NAGARA, DISTRICT- SARAN ----------- 2 06.05.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State and the respondent-Bank. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 30th September, 1992 as a Security Guard from the service of the Bank, the retiral dues has remained to be settled as yet despite representation dated 13th November, 2006 as contained in Annexure-5. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Bank submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner has represented the matter, however, for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.5. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and upon consideration the admitted dues found payable could also be paid to the petitioner along with interest permissible under the rules. However, upon consideration if any of the claims or part of the claim is found not admissible the same shall be informed to the petitioner with reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)