IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 8572 of 2010, a/w 8573 to 8582,8584 & 8585 of 2010 Decided on: 30.12.2010 1. CWP No. 8572 of 2010 Deepak Versus State of H.P. and ors. 2. CWP No. 8573 of 2010 Pansara Versus State of H.P. and ors. 3. CWP No. 8574 of 2010 Vir Bahadur Versus State of H.P. and ors. 4. CWP No. 8575 of 2010 Bimla Versus State of H.P. and ors. 5. CWP No. 8576 of 2010 Man Singh Versus State of H.P. and ors. 6. CWP No. 8577 of 2010 Deepak Versus State of H.P. and ors. 7. CWP No. 8578 of 2010 Dhansara Versus State of H.P. and ors. 8. CWP No. 8579 of 2010 Parvati Versus State of H.P. and ors. 9. CWP No. 8580 of 2010 Ramu Versus State of H.P. and ors. 10. CWP No. 8581 of 2010 Narender Versus State of H.P. and ors. 11. CWP No. 8582 of 2010 Roop Singh Versus State of H.P. and ors. 12. CWP No. 8584 of 2010 Bimla Versus State of H.P. and ors. 13. CWP No. 8585 of 2010 Kishan Bahadur Versus State of H.P. and ors. Coram : The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge For the petitioners: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents-State: Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G with Mr. Ankus Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. 2 Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral): The writ petitions are filed with identical prayers, one set of prayers is as follows:- “(i) That the respondents may kindly be directed to regularize the services of the petitioner on the completion of 8 years continuous service with 240 days in each calendar year w.e.f. dute date, i.e., 01.08.2010 as per the policy of the State Govt. (ii) That the respondents may further be directed to give the all consequential benefits in the favour of petitioner w.e.f. 01.08.2010 till the date of realization with interest @ 18% per annum.” 2. According to the petitioners, their case is covered by the judgment of this Court in CWP No. 1594 of 2008, titled Man Singh versus The State of H.P. and others along with connected matters, dated 27.7.2009. The learned Addl. Advocate General submits that the factual position will have to be verified. Therefore, these writ petitions are disposed of directing the second respondent/competent authority to look into the matter and after verifying the facts take appropriate action in accordance with law in light also of the judgment, referred to above, within four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment and a copy of the judgment, referred to above, along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner concerned. 3. With these observations, the writ petitions stand disposed of, so also the pending application(s) if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice (Justice V.K. Sharma), December 30, 2010 Judge (VT/pankaj)