IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.882 of 2011 (Arising out of C.W.J.C. No. 4035 of 2008) 1. Prabhat Ranjan Singh S/O Late Bhagwat Prasad Singh C/O Sri Pawan Nayak , Shop Keeper R/O Laheriaganj Ward No.1, P.O. + Distt.- Madhubani, P.S.- Mangrami Raj Nagar……………………………………………….Appellant Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Bihar, Patna 2. The Commissioner, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga 3. District Magistrate, Madhubani 4. Deputy Collector Incharge Establishment Distt.- Mdhubani 5. Deputy Collector, Incharge Nazarat, Madhubani………………..Respondents ----------- 2. 29.8.2011 Heard the parties. From the facts noted by the Writ Court it appears that petitioner/appellant is aggrieved on account of his name being not included in the panel prepared in the year 2004, although the panel consists of 121 persons. Some persons junior to the appellant in the 1994 panel are alleged to have occupied serial Nos. 52, 110 and 112 in the panel of 2004 which has been prepared for filling up 44 vacancies only. The Writ Court on considering that grievances raised on behalf of the appellant were numerous and varied, directed the District Magistrate, Madhubani to consider his representation, if filed within six months. Although, it is not clear from the records but it has been rightly held that the vacancies must have been filled up after the panel was finalized in the year 2004. Those class-IV employees who were appointed out of the said panel are not party to the 2 present litigation. In our view, it would not serve any useful purpose to keep this appeal pending. We are also of the view that the matter should first receive consideration by the District Magistrate, if the appellant files a representation. We add that if the appellant’s claim is not found acceptable and he is not found fit for the panel of 2004 then reasons, in brief, shall be communicated to him within 6 months of filing of representation. The appeal is disposed of. Mkc/ (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Shivaji Pandey, J.)