IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 2529 of 2009 Between: Ch.Shiva Rami Reddy S/o.Ch.Buchi Reddy R/o.12-1-508/B/50/D,Sripuri colony Lalapet, Behind Railway Quarters,Hyderabad-40 ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Deputy Commissioner , GHMC, (Secunderabad Circle ), Hyderabad 2 The Tahsildar, Marredpally, Hyderabad 3 Smt.A.Geetha W/o.Venkat Reddy R/o.H.No.12-1-508/B/50/C, Sripuri colony Lalapet, Behind Railway Quarters, Hyderabad-40 4 K.Rathaiah S/o.K.Pulla Rao C/o.G.Subba Rao, R/o.H.No.12-1-508/B/50/68, Sripuri colony Lalapet, Behind Railway Quarters, Hyderabad-40 ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No.1 and 2 in not taking any action on the respondent No.1 and 2 in not taking any action on the representation of the petitioners dated 17.10.2008 complaining about illegal, and unauthorized construction of the respondent No.3 and 4 encroaching public road and government as arbitrary, illegal, and violative of Article 14,19,(1)(g) ,21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.1 and 2 to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 17.10.2008 and take necessary action on the illegal, and unauthorized construction being undertaking by the Respondent No.3 and 4 at Sripuri colony, Lalapet, Hyderabad. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.VIJAY B.PAROPAKARI Counsel for the Respondent No.: R.RAMACHANDRA REDDY,SC FOR MCH 1,2,4&6 The Court made the following : ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the respondent Corporation and at their request the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner questioning the action of respondents 1 and 2 in not taking any action on his representation dated 17.10.2008 complaining about the illegal and unauthorized constructions raised by respondent Nos. 3 and 4 by encroaching the public road and government land. When the matter came up on the last occasion, the learned standing counsel for the respondent Corporation took time to get instructions and today he submits that action will be initiated on the representation of the petitioner. In the circumstances, without going into the merits of the matter, respondents 1 and 2 are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner and take necessary action expeditiously after giving notice to unofficial respondents 3 and 4 and after giving them an opportunity to put forth their case. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. N.V.RAMANA,J DT.18.2.2009 msv