wmw yam Q1) IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON (S) No. £ W? OF 2011 (8.3.) 9/ PETITIONER: Smt. Hemlata Ekka, W/o Shri lgnatius Ekka, aged about 50 years, Resident of Quarter no. D- 29, Pension Bada, Raipur, Tahsil and District - Raipur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, ThroughLThe Secretary, General Administration Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantraiaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). 2: The President Gazetted Officer Departmental Promotion Committee, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantraiaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh).. K. K. Bhuarya, S/o Not Known, Section Officer, Generai Administration Department, D.K.S. Bhawan,vMantraiaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). 4. Premsingh Gharendra, S/o Not Known, Section Officer, Generai Administration Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantraiaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION AND/OR A SUITABLE DIRECTION OR RESPONDENTS: 1. (v ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER 1 DETAILS OF THE PETITION PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS. As per‘stated in the caUse titief \ , mmwmswuv .u. ...........a1 zoo -mm(W§“) mmm WW§WW Shri Prakash Tiwari, unse§ for the petitioner. Shri Sumegh Baj' j, By. AG. far ’che $tateirespandent NO . 1 & 2. Grievance of the pe itioner is that thaugh he is senmr ta respondent N054, 3 & 4, igncring the case of the petiticnerwresponden NOS. 3 & 4 have been promoted on the post of E3 ction Gfficer. Learned couneel for he petitioner submits that in the gradation list (Annexrre P—S) the petitioner has been shown senior to resp ndent Noe, 3 & 4 but yet the petitioner has not been pr moteoi He submits that the petitioner has already made representation to respondent No.1 on 19.0 .2011 and the purpose of fiiing this petition would b served if direction is issued to respondent No. 1 for deciding the pending representation of the petiti ner. Learned $tate cou sei points out that the l petitioner has recently ade her representation on l 19.09.2011 and without aiting for sufficient time she has reached the Court an therefore some reasonable ommm, W-Fs/na—z/zoi 1—1 ,so,ooo. Xi-HC”~78 'WWW W13? W time may be given to respandent. Natl fur consideration of petitioner’s representati an. Accurciingiy, the pr6$ent petition is disposed of with a direction to respiondent No.1 to decide the pending representation o he petitioner as expeditiously as posSibIe, referabiv Within four months from the date of receipt o copy of this order It would be the duty of the petition r to apprise respondent No 1 about the passing of this 0 tier It is made clear tha this court has not expressed any epinien on the merits'of the case and the authority concerned would be t liberty to deCide the representation of the pe itioner strictly in accordance ' with law after due scrutiny of the facts. ‘ Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge WWwcwéW/U W 200 swam WW “(mm man "Hfam mm?m §' 13w} WK am aawW $ aii‘mm