BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Eighteenth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.13844 of 2011 MUTHURAMAN ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 Vs THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHEKKANURANI POLICE STATION, MADURAI. IN CR. NO. 380/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. P.AMMAVASAI Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.S.DURAI PANDI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest , the petitioner in Crime NO.380 of 2011, on the file of the respondent Police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 171(E)(H) and 188 of the Indian Penal Code read with 123 of R.O.P. Act, has come forward with this Petition seeking for anticipatory bail. 2.According to the case of the prosecution, it is alleged that the petitioner, is contesting in the local body election. The first accused was found distributing money to the voters. A sumof Rs.35,000/- seized from him. 3.It is the allegation that the said money was given only by this Petitioner for the purpose of distribution. 4.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner did not give any amount to the first accused for the purpose of distribution to the voters. He would further submit that the petitioner shall not make any claim for the sum of Rs.35,000/- seized from the first Accused. The said statement is recorded. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the submissions, I am inclined to grant anticiaptory bail to the petitioner. 6.Accordinglly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearnace before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.1, Usilampatti, Madurai District on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m. for a period of 8 weeks. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. sd/- 18/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRAE NO.I USILAMPATTI MADURAI DISTRICT 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHEKKANURANI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S. P.AMMAVASAI Advocate SR.No.35834 rl/6c – 19.10.2011 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13844 of 2011 Date :18/10/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/