(3) c^ ^^ ^) SingleBeneh IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH JUmCATURE AT BILASPUR Wr.P. / S) No. ^\r^ /2011 PBTITIONBR:- ^ \^"^ ^(^^ ^^•^ ^ ^•::"\ _' ..••••y"^>> ;%^"" <> Dr. Jagdish Prasad Soni S/o Shri Dhansai Soni Aged about 33 years Occupation -Medical officer District Hospital Mahasamund Dist-Mahasamund (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS:- T*^/' 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through, Secretary , Department of Health and Family welfare Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) V" 2. Collector , Mahasamund Dist-Mahasamund (C.G.) ^" 3. Chief Medical and Health Officer , Mahasamund Dist-Mahasamund (C.G.) <^^— ^-- 4.Civil Surgeon District Hospital - Mahasamund Dist-Mahasamund (C.G.) WRIT PBTITION UNDBR ARTICLB 226/227 OF THB^ONSTfTUTION OF IN^IA .__.-L._._.,_. (&S5: . H1GH COURTOR.CHHATnSQARH AT BILASRJR WRITPETmON^No;345E20F2011 r PETmONER : Dr. JagdishPras^l Soni VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Oihattisgarh & Othere. WRtT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22^227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihotri. J. ^^ Present: Shri Atul Pandey, Advocsrfe for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. ORDERfORALl (Passed on this 01st day of July, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner subfflits that vtele order dated 15.07.2010 (Annexure P/1), th®pefitioner, vwrkii^ s®Me^ical Officer at District Hospital Mahasamund, District Mahaaamund, has been transferred to District Hospital Korba, District Korba, on Ms own reqyst. However, the petitioner has not yet been relieved to join the new place of postlng. Shri Pandey submits that once the order of transfer has been passed, it is for the govemment to ensure that it is eomplied with jmmediatety. He relies on a decision of the Supreme Cowt in Snsedam ChandlfQ Gbosh v. State ofAssam & o^wfs, in support of hte conten^on that if the order is not complied with, a dtrecfion can be issited for enforcement thereof. 2. Shri Dwivedi, leamed C^. Govt. Advocate appearing for the State/ resppndente submits that that if the transfer order ttated t5j07.2010 ^nnexufe P/1) is still in extstence and has not beeB compUed wth, a^propriate steps vroutd be taken to c»mplywith^ie oBder. 3. tf the aforesaid transfer order is stiN in exisfnc®,the goyemnient js under an obligatipn to cpmpiy with the same at on^ directed that the transferorder shall b©(K>m^lied with ferthwithrw^thin a peiriod oftwoweete. - 4. Accordjngly, this petition stands disposed of. r Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ashok 1 (1996) 1QSOC 567