IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2354 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.2354 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.2354 OF 2005 IN IN IN SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.24830 OF APPEAL NO.24830 OF APPEAL NO.24830 OF 2005 2005 2005 Shri.Dearam Jairam Sathe & Ors. ..Applicants V/s Smt.Vithobai Jairam Sathe & Ors. ..Respondents ----- Mr.Rajesh Shety i/b. Satyajeet Raje Shirke for the Applicants. Mr. Shailendra i/b. P.S.Dane for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN DATE DATE DATE : 13TH JUNE, 2006. : 13TH JUNE, 2006. : 13TH JUNE, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The learned Counsel for the Applicants seeks leave to amend prayer clause (a). Leave granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. 2. Perused the Civil Application. By this Civil Application, the Applicants are seeking condonation of 90 days delay. For the reasons stated in the Civil Application, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Applicants. Hence, Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)