MSS : 1 : FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 143 OF 2005 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 43 OF 2005 --------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office : Memoranda of Coram, : appearances, Court’s : Court’s or Judge’s Orders orders or directions : & Registrar’s orders. : . --------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Mr. R.J. Mane for appellant Mr. S.S. Bhende, AGP for respondents CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI & CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI & CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI & SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. 4/9/2006 P.C.:- In this Letters Patent Appeal order dated 22/6/05 passed by the learned Single Judge, rejecting the applicant’s prayer for transfer of her petition to Pandharpur is under challenge. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant. Admittedly the earlier transfer applications which were made by the appellant were rejected. The learned Single Judge has rightly observed that MSS : 2 : no case is made out for transfer. It is not possible for us to entertain the present Letters Patent Appeal. The learned counsel for the appellant contended that in fact the appellant is residing at Pandharpur and not at Mahim. Affidavit-in-reply filed by the respondent stating that the appellant is not residing at Pandharpur is false. We do not want to go into that aspect of the matter. Needless to say that the trial court will consider every aspect of the matter after the evidence is led. With this observation Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed.