IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 7TH MARCH 2011 / 16TH PHALGUNA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 1829 of 2011() ------------------------ CRIME NO. 566 OF 2008 OF ANCHAL POLICE STATION CC.1940/2008 of J.M.F.C.-I, PUNALUR .................... PETITIONER --------- NAZAR @ SARKAR NAZAR, S/O.MUHAMMED HANEEFA, CHARUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, VAYANASALA JUNCTION, ERAM P.O., THADIKKADU, KOLLAM DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI. K.SIJU SRI.A.MUHAMMED RAFFI SMT.BINDU GEORGE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANCHAL POLICE STAITON THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.S. HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ------------------------------- Bail Application No. 1829 of 2011 ------------------------------- DATED: 07-03-2011 O R D E R Petitioner who is the accused in Crime No. 566 of 2008 of Anchal Police Station, Kollam for offences punishable under Sections 323 and 354 I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail. 2. Consequent on the non-appearance of the petitioner in C.C. No. 1940 of 2008 on the file of the J.F.C.M. I, Punalur, non- bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioner. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Magistrate and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the Magistrate and files an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of preferably on the same day on which it is filed notwithstanding the pendency of non-bailable warrants of arrest against the petitioner and also after considering the explanation offered by the petitioner for his previous non-appearance. With the above observation this application is disposed of . V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. ani/