IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No.33380 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 04, 2011 Satnam Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.G.P.Singh Ahluwalia, Advocate, for Mr.Rajeev. K. Kapila, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The prayer in this case is for registration of an FIR under Section 306 IPC. The son of the petitioner has committed suicide and he wants case to be registered against deceased's wife. Without making any comment on the allegations made, the petitioner, if so advised, may have his remedy in terms of law laid down in Sakiri Vasu Versus State of U.P. and others, 2008(1) RCR (Criminal) 392. No case for interference, thus, is made out. Dismissed. November 04, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE