R.S.A No. 1064 of 2007 (O&M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.M No. 2934-C of 2007 and R.S.A No. 1064 of 2007 (O&M) Date of decision : September 01, 2009 Jagdish Singh and others, ...... Appellant (s) v. Smt. Sushila & others, ...... Respondent(s) *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Mukul Aggarwal, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Kulbhushan Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 5. Mr. P.R.Yadav, Advocate for respondents No.6 to 10. Mr. S.P.Chahar, Advocate for respondents No.12 to 15. Mr. Mukesh Verma, Advocate for respondents No.19 and 20. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) C.M No. 2934-C of 2007 This is an application for impleading the applicants as party to the present appeal. The only plea taken is that since they had purchased the land, they are necessary parties. The said vendors had filed RSA No.1310 of R.S.A No. 1064 of 2007 (O&M) ::2:: 2007, Krishan and others vs Smt. Sushila and others, which has been dismissed by this Court vide order of even date. Admittedly, the applicants have stepped into the shoe of their vendors and would be bound by the findings which may be recorded with regard to the title of the said vendors. Since, as mentioned above, the appeal filed by the vendors has been dismissed, this application is also dismissed. R.S.A No.1064 of 2007 Since the application under Order 1 Rule 10 of the CPC has been dismissed, this appeal has to be dismissed being not maintainable. Ordered accordingly. As the main appeal has since been dismissed, all the pending civil miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) September 01, 2009. JUDGE `kk'