IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :16.02.2010 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W. P. No.44756 of 2006 (T) O.A.No.6230 of 1999 M.Muthuraja ... Petitioner vs. 1.Director – General of Police, Chennai – 4. 2.Commissioner of Police, City Police Office, Coimbatore City @ Coimbatore – 18. 3.Deputy Commissioner of Police, Law and Order, Coimbatore City Coimbatore. ...Respondents Prayer: This Writ Petition came to be numbered under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by way of transfer of O.A.No.6230 of 1999 from the file of the Tamil Administrative Tribunal with a prayer to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the punishment of reduction in pay by one stage for one year without cumulative effect passed by the third respondent herein in his P.R.No.7/98 dated 16.10.1998 and the consequential modified punishment of postponement of next increment for one year without cumulative effect passed by the second respondent herein in his C.NO.F3/Ap/129/98 dated 09.02.1999 with all consequential monetary and service benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ravi For Respondents : Mr.Shivashanmugam Govt. Advocate O R D E R This writ petition is filed to to quash the punishment of reduction in pay by one stage for one year without cumulative effect passed by the third respondent herein in his P.R.No.7/98 dated 16.10.1998 and the consequential modified punishment of postponement of next increment for one year without cumulative effect passed by the second respondent herein in his C.NO.F3/Ap/129/98 dated 09.02.1999 with all consequential monetary and service benefits. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. The petitioner challenges the order of punishment imposed viz., reduction in pay by one stage for one year without cumulative effect has been modified to postponement of increment for one year without cumulative effect. The petitioner has submitted a review petition to the first respondent/ Director General of police and the same has not been disposed of so far. 3. In such view of the matter, the petitioner is entitled to make a further representation in this regard. The first respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the review petition as well as the representation if any made within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Sd/- Asst.Registrar /True Copy/ Sub.Asst.Registrar ra To 1)The Director – General of Police Chennai – 4. 2)The Commissioner of Police City Police Office Coimbatore City @ Coimbatore – 18. 3)The Deputy Commissioner of Police Law and Order, Coimbatore City Coimbatore. W. P. No.44756 of 2006 VS(CO) RVL 05.03.2010 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/