IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 912 of 2008 Jagdish & others. … Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others. … Respondents None for the petitioners. Mr. Nandan Arya, A.G.A for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Rajendra Singh, Advocate for respondent no. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. None for the petitioners. Mr. Nandan Arya, A.G.A for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Rajendra Singh, Advocate for respondent no. 3. 2. Mr. Nandan Arya, the learned A.G.A. submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners, has become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case have submitted the chargesheet against all the petitioners before the court concerned on 27.01.2009. This fact has been indicated in Para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Consequently, the interim order dated 19.11.2008 stands vacated automatically. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 19.02.2009 V.K