IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6481 of 2006 Binay Kumar son of Kedar Prasad Yadav, R/o Police Line, Saharsa, P.S. & District Saharsa…….Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. District Magistrate, Saharsa, District Saharsa. 3. Executive Officer, Nagar Parisad, Saharsa, District Saharsa…………………………………………....Respondents. For the petitioner : M/s Sharda Nand Mishra, Dhananjay Kr. Gupta and Ranjan Kumar, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Rajeev Kumar, AC to SC -7 ---------------------------------- 03/ 07.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for directing the respondents authorities to grant the amount worth Rs.8,71,813.00 which was due with the respondents as the petitioner had completed the work allotted to him at different times as per the Yojna. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the said amount is admitted but is not being paid and hence the respondents are liable to pay the same to the petitioner with interest. 4. Considering the averments made by learned counsel for the parties and the materials on record, this writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the Executive Officer, Nagar Parisad, Saharsa along with an application giving details of the dues claimed by him. If such an application is filed within 15 days from today along with a copy of this order, the said authority shall consider the - 2 - same and shall decide it by a speaking order in accordance with law within three months thereafter. If any amount or interest is found to be admitted and payable, it should be paid to the petitioner immediately thereafter. However, if any amount or interest is not found to be admitted and payable in the said order, the petitioner will be at liberty to challenge the same before an appropriate forum. Harish (S.N. Hussain, J.)