WP(C) 4609/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Choudhury, the learned counsel for the petitio ner and Mr. Bora, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 1, 3, 6, 7 and 8 as well as Mr. Choudhury, learned Standing Counsel, Finance Dep artment appearing for the respondent Nos.2, 4 and 5. Considering the nature of grievance raised and as agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of at the motion stage itself. The claim of the petitioner in the present petition is t hat though he has undertaken certain works in terms of the various work orders i ssued, the amount due and payable has not been paid. According to the petitione r, an amount of Rs.6,59,144/- is still due and payable by the Executive Engineer , PWD, Guwahati Electrical Division and though such liability has been admitted by the Chief Engineer, PWD (Building) vide communication dated 02-07-2008 issued to the Deputy Secretary to the Government of Assam, PWD (Budget), the same has not been paid. The learned counsel appearing for the parties have submi tted that the matter in issue in the present writ petition has already been answ ered in Tamsher Ali & Ors.-Vs- State of Assam & Ors. reported in (2008) 4 GLT 1 and as such, the present writ petition may be disposed of in terms of the direc tions contained in the aforesaid judgment and order. In view of the above the present writ petition is dispos ed of in terms of the direction contained in the aforesaid judgment and order pa ssed in Tamsher Ali’s case. The petitioner shall be entitled to such benefit in term s of the directions contained in the aforesaid judgment. The name of the petiti oner now be registered and the necessary payment in accordance with the directio ns contained in the said judgment shall be made. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No cost.