IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3455 of 2009 CHANDNI DEVI @ CHANIA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 23.3.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State as also counsel for the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner, the wife of late Dharm Nath Singh @ Dharm Nath Pd. Singh, Assistant Sub Inspector of Police, as against the order of punishment dated 17.3.2001/ 31.3.2001, vide Annexures 1 and 3 to the writ application, cannot be entertained for a simple reason that the two orders passed in the life time and in the service period of her husband were allowed to become final and in fact the husband of the petitioner having retired from service had died on 28.9.2006. That being so, as the right of the petitioner is confined to only family pension, she cannot be allowed to reopen the events of service of her husband. What would be the implication of such order in the matter of payment of family pension in fact is also subject matter of M.J.C.No. 2084/2008 which of course will be governed 2 by its own merit without being in any manner affected by the result of this application. This application stands dismissed with the aforementioned observation. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/