IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 66 OF 2011 SMT. JYOTSNA METHA AND 5 ORS., ... Petitioners Versus SMT. CHARU JOSHI AND 6 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Nitin Sardessai, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. A. F. Diniz, Advocate for respondent nos.1 to 6. Mr. A. D. Bhobe, Advocate for respondent no.7. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 21st June, 2011 P.C. Minutes of orders along with annexures signed by the parties and their respective Advocates are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification purpose. 2. Mr. Sardessai, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Diniz, learned Counsel for respondent nos.1 to 6 and Mr. Bhobe, learned Counsel for respondent no.7 state that all the parties have signed the minutes of order in their presence. Learned Counsel for the parties state that all the parties except respondent nos.1 and 2 are present and on behalf of respondent nos.1 and 2, respondent no.3, who is the duly constituted Attorney of respondent nos.1 and 2, has signed the Minutes of Order. It is further stated that the petitioners are represented by the duly constituted Attorney, who is present in the Court. Learned Counsel for the parties state that the parties have signed the consent terms after understanding the contents of the minutes of the order. Learned Counsel for the parties state that Writ Petition be disposed of in terms of the minutes of order. 3. The undertakings given by the parties in the Minutes of Order are accepted. In view of the above, Writ Petition stands disposed of in terms of Minutes of Order. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA