Gowri '^ HIGH CGURT OF CHHATTISGARH : PETJTIONER 2. Laxman Rao h/iagar. age about year, U.D.T., S/o Late Shri Ghasi Ram Magar, Govt. Hr. S. Schooi, Amarikala, Block Gurur, Distt. Durg (CG). Versus State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretery, Education Department, DX.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). The District Education Officer, Durg, Dist. Durg(CG). (Writ petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of india) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Somkant Verma, eounsel for the petjtioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Advocate Genera! for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 25 n day of February, 2009) Shri Y.S. Thakur, learned Dy. Advocate General appearing for the State submits that the impugned order dated 31-10-2008 (Annexure-P/1) has admittedly been passed without affording opportunity of hearing to the petitipner. Shri Thakur further submits that the State shalS recali the order and the State may be granted liberty to take appropriate steps after issuing show cause notlce and affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, in accordance with iaw. In view of the above categorical statement made by the iearned Dy.. Advocate General, according to leamed counsel for the petitioner nothing survives in this petition Tor adjudication. Accordingiy, the petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. Consequentiy. pending appiicatlons, ifany, alsostand disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge