IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 6000 of 2008 Decided on: 17.08.2010 Desh Raj Sharma. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner. : Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General,for respondents No. 1 to 3 None for respondent No. 4. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Petitioner has assailed the appointment of respondent No. 4 only on the ground that he was not eligible as per the Recruitment and Promotion Rules, for the post of Instructor Weaving, Class -III. It has come in the supplementary affidavit filed by the respondent-State that the respondent No. 4 was duly eligible as per the notification dated 15th October, 1987 whereby, Recruitment and Promotion Rules for the post of Instructor Weaving were notified. 2. Accordingly, in view of the observation made 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No -2- hereinabove, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge August 17, 2010 (K. Attri)