RSA No.1849 of 2009 [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... RSA No.1849 of 2009 Decided on : May 04, 2009 Kashmir Singh ... Appellant VERSUS Balbir Singh ... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Vinod Khunger, Advocate for the appellant. A.N.JINDAL, J.- This regular second appeal has been filed by the defendant – appellant (herein referred as the appellant) challenging the judgments of both the courts below, wherein, the plaintiff – respondent (herein referred as the respondent) has been held to be in possession of the suit property. The statements of the respondent supported by Darshan Singh (PW2) as well as the revenue record duly establish his possession. The production of Rojnamacha was not sufficient to rebut the aforesaid evidence. The appellant has not led any cogent evidence to prove his possession. Neither the Jamabandi nor the Khasra Girdawari, showing the possession of the appellant at the time of filing of the suit, has been RSA No.1849 of 2009 [ 2 ] brought on record. No substantial question of law arises or is involved in the appeal. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. May 04, 2009 ( A.N.JINDAL ) `gian' JUDGE