IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE 16TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 27TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 1154 of 2010(T) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ 1. K.C.RAJESH KUMAR, S/O.CHANDRASEKHARAN ACHARI, SAJEEV BHAVAN, VARINJAM, KALLUVATHUKKAL, KALLUVATHUKKAL VILLAGE, KOLLAM. 2. S.RAVEENDRAN, S/O.SUKUMARAN CHETTIYAR, SUNIL BHAVAN, CHAVARCODE, PARIPPALLY, KOLLAM. BY ADV. MR.S.MOHAMMED AL RAFI RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. JOINT REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, KOLLAM. 3. THE NADAKKAL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.1874 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KALLUVATHUKKAL P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. K.C. SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/02/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.1154 of 2010 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of February, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioners are persons who are working as Daily Collection Agents under the third respondent bank. They joined duty in the year 2005. Though they have been continuing to work, their complaint is that they are not confirmed. As per Ext.P1 circular issued by the Co-operative Department, Societies like the third respondent may regularise the service of Collection Agents who were continuing in the post. The petitioners have also submitted Exts.P2 and P3 representations before the third respondent. They have approached this Court complaining that no action has been taken on their representations. 2. The counsel for the third respondent submits that the services of the petitioners have already been confirmed and letters have been issued to them in this regard. Since the petitioners have already been confirmed, the grievances of the petitioner cannot subsist at present. However, since Exts.P2 and P3 representations are pending before the third respondent, this Writ Petition can be disposed of directing an expeditious disposal of the said representations. 3. This Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of directing the third respondent to consider Exts.P2 and P3 representations of the petitioners and to pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE CSS/