^ e. ^ ijUi'?iTcB@ nwvLt spw ^~ ^^^^i^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR :C.G. W.P.(C)no. ^'3-fQj- PETITIONERS : U&.S-c.^AnvW ^ ^Sus<At^V.-^-v'n'f'"" e <' 1. Biswanafh Tripafhy, aged about 47 years, s/o. late Shri Sashi Bhusan Tripathy, Director Postal Services C.G. Circle, Raipur, C.G. »k<.< Post Offices, Durg Division, Civic Center, Bhilai, dist. Durg, C.G. ^^••^^'BhauRao Nimsatkar aged about 59 ^ -?.^%^ .... years, s/o Shri Rushijee, Sr. Suptd. of Post Offices. DUT£Division, Civic ,.•••" -)' ^~\^/.-" u'^j.,'-'" e°P<' ..^ ^3. Ram Singh Thakur, aged about 51 years, s/o Shri Shambhu Ram Thakur, Post Master, Durg Head OfBce, Durg. VERSUS RESPONDENT : P^ c^-i i-X'.'Ti/l>e.c»p^- D. M. Dongre, aged about 47 years, s/o Shri Mangoji Dongre, r/o Quarter no. 9-B, Street no. 6, Sector 1, Bhilai Nagar, distDurg. t\0 ^us^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTIN OF INDIA FOR ISSUE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/ CERTIORARAI/ PROHIBITION OR DIRECTIVE /ORDERS E\ THE LIKE NATURE ETC. XI-HC-78 sn^rqirf^iffi (TSIT3TT^Tsht( +1WCTI sh*1|ch 3^''?TF(T?ra', ^Tllu'lio, RlMltiy .^';/7.CQ...(.3.?7. ^R; 200^ W^W W<h ('y^'f^'iff) gTBTWflfgtT-W^T 31.01.2007 yfan tjtusnma Kiager, tiy Uus peuuon proceedings against them. Uieni in clisobeyuig Uie ju| passed in Civu. Suit No. 13^ II, Durg. tbe fbr jupginent tite Leamect counsel tor tavour ol Uie respondent w^s from deducting penal re^t However, me cleclucnons w^ 2003 to March 2003 i.e. tijir aUeganons sai application (|)t were issuecl. It is contencled.1 up TJie cliarge ot ttieu' respqcuve wfiicti Uie allegect decluction|s De Jield responsiOle tor Uie vt He furfher submlts filiat taKen cogiuzance ot t&e proceeduigs agamst me Deen namea m. me appiicat|ion furtlier submits fhat the represented fhrough fheir personat appearance is bein^ «)ii''<f<-]<l1-< iiiclTfftei:^)'<Rl+ei< ^srf^iTan^r connsel lor ttte petitioners. peUUoners are c&aUenging ttie Uie allegea couteiapt coiiimittect by and decree dated 06.01.2003 -A/ 2002 by tbe F'irst Civil Judge Class petittoners suDinits ttiat Uie decree ui passect restrauiuig postal aepaniaent vide judgnienf dated 06.01.2003. re effected froni Uie nionfh of Janiiaiv a penoct ot Uiree nionuis. Un Uiese Aiuiexure p-b was tilea and nouces uiat uie present pe&Uouers iiave taKen posts subsequent to the dates on 3 were niacte ancl as sucli t&ev inav not 'iUtul ctisoDectience ot Uie decree. ttie 'Jourt Delow ougJlt not to liave applicaUon tor uunaUng contenipt pqtiUoners as tJie contenuiers nave not :at|ion, eveu Uien nonces were issuecl. He pe|Utioners are not beuig permitted to be aldvocates bv fhe Court below and their ig insistecl upon. v^\ n-T XI-HC-78 an^r^rf^lR; (RT3IR?TshHI<0 s/'\o-^ h ^ ^ +1I*1MI shlicb 3^ -^wwi, w!\ww, [sfiwy. y>5:/7;.(c.<>...!3.^ ^ 200 7 aii^i <4a<*i (y(j°<s]sc) ??tiTgiH<?(T3-n^T I have heard counsel i| f'roin Uie ctocuinents the petiuoners were procef despite service ot nouce. It rent troin Uie salarv ot Uie ol uonce. Consideniig Uie tacts| peuuon is being dispose.cl 4 appear ui person betore Ui( tiearuig and. submit Uieir Uiein, wmcn stiau De cleciq petitioners shaU be pemiitte|d r^ply In view ol above, IV stancl disposed ot. °ni<ifci<fl-l t|lHMTfffe<:^t'<("]«l< ^arf^Tffan^r |or t&e penuoners. Itiled by tlie petitioners it appears tB.at tclecl ex-parte as ttiey tlld not appear IturUier appears that deducUon ot penal [•esponctent coutinuecl eveu atter service and cn'cum.stances ot me case, Uus 't witti a direcUon to tQe peuuonei-s to concenied Court on the next ctate ot' to Uie stiow cause nouce issuecl to ect on its own inents. 'l'Jierealter, Uie to appear through TIieh- counsel. ,'w.P.No. 255/05 aiid i.A.No. 711/07 Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge P.T.O.