1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRI. WRIT PETITION NO.660 OF 2008. (MANGESH ANIL HIRKANE Vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Ms. N.P. Mehta h/f. Shri S.P. Bhandarkar, Adv. for Petitioner. Shri S.S. Doifode, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : A.H.JOSHI & R.C.CHAVAN, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 30, 2009. 1. The affidavit in reply contains following statement : “It is further informed that he was put anti Epilepsy drugs. He has not epileptic seizure since then. It is further informed that the applicant has not complained any urinary problem since admission to prison hospital.” 2. This statement is based on written intimation received from the Medical Officer/Psychiatrist, Central Prison, Nagpur. 3. In this background, there is no merit in the petition. The petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE RR.