IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 86 of 2009 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No. 0436 OF 2009 Shankar Ramdas Shinde. ..Applicant. Vs. Arun Namdeo Sakat & Ors ..Respondents. Mr Amol A. Gatne, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs S.D. Shinde, A.P.P. for the State. Mr A.M. Saraogi a/w Ms Seema Gupta for Respondent No.1. CORAM : A.R. JOSHI,J. CORAM : A.R. JOSHI,J. CORAM : A.R. JOSHI,J. DATED : 4th April,2009. DATED : 4th April,2009. DATED : 4th April,2009. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. The original complainant has filed the present application for allowing as intervener in criminal writ petition No.436 of 2009 which is filed by original accused against the order of recalling of the witness. 2. An application for recalling witness moved before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate was allowed and the said order was upheld by the learned Sessions Judge, Mumbai. It is the factual position that after filing of this application for impleadment on directions from this Court dated 4.3.2009 original complainant was impleaded as party respondent no.2 and as such amendment has already been carried out in the writ petition and the applicant in Criminal Application No.86 of 2009 i.e. original complainant has filed his appearance. Hence, present application becomes infructuous. 3. In the result, application stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. (A.R.JOSHI,J.) (A.R.JOSHI,J.) (A.R.JOSHI,J.)