FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURNAGABAD Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directios and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS __________________________________________________________________________________________ 903 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9272 OF 2005 ,In RC/1970/2008 , STATE OF MAH VERSUS NIVRUTI GOVIND KANKATE ... Advocate for Petitioner(s) : Mr. K.S. Patil, AGP ... CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J. Dated: July 26, 2011 ... 1 This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 4293 days occurred in presenting the appeal. 2 Heard Mr. K.S. Patil, learned AGP for the State. Award was passed by the reference court on 29-7-1993 and the appeal is presented in the year 2005. There is absolutely no explanation in respect of occurrence of such a huge delay, noted in the application. Reference court has awarded enhanced compensation to the tune of Rs. 52,226/- in respect of acquisition of 3 H and 16 R land. Compensation determined by the reference court is at rate less than Rs. 10,000/- per acre. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURNAGABAD Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directios and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS __________________________________________________________________________________________ Even on considering the merits of the appeal, there is no justification for causing interference. Application is without any substance and as such stands rejected. 3 In view of rejection of application, appeal presented by the State need not be registered. Appellant is entitled to refund of court fees in accordance with rules. ( R.M. BORDE, J. ) dyb