IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 18TH MAY 2010 / 28TH VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 15031 of 2010(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- INDIRA V., JUNIOR PUBLIC HEALTH NURSE GR.I, P.H.C., MANGATTIDAM, P.O.MANGATTIDAM, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER FOR HEALTH, KANNUR. MR.ARAVIND KUMAR BABU, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.15031 of 2010 (D) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 18th day of May, 2010 J U D G M E N T Claim of the petitioner is to direct the respondents to count the provisional services rendered by her for the purpose of increments. Relying on Exts.P4 to P10 judgments, the petitioner submitted Ext.P3 representation to the 1st respondent and there has not been any response. It is with this grievance, the writ petition is filed. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, similar benefits have been extended by Exts.P4 to P10 judgments, there is no reason why such benefits are denied to the petitioner. Be that as it may, having regard to the pendency of Ext.P3 representation, I feel it is only appropriate that the 1st respondent shall consider Ext.P3 in the light of Exts.P4 to P10 judgments with notice to the petitioner. This the 1st respondent shall do as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months of production of a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this writ petition. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg