IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37242 of 2010 AMIT KUMAR S/O SRI RAJU PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NEW ETWARPUR, P.S. PARSA BAZAR, DISTRICT PATNA. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 11.10.2010. Heard Shri Awadhesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Shri B.P. Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. It is a case for the offence under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. This is the second attempt for bail on behalf of the petitioner. Earlier on 16.3.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No.7772 of 2010, prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected. The prayer for bail has been renewed on the ground that after rejection of bail of this petitioner, other two accused persons were granted bail vide Annexures 3 & 3/A to the petition. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since more than 13 months and as such it has been prayed to enlarge him on bail. Since the prayer for bail of this petitioner was already rejected on merit, besides taking into account, the antecedent 2 N.H./ of this petitioner, there is no point to re- consider the prayer for bail. So far as bail granted to co-accused Siya Saran Rai is concerned, he was granted bail considering the fact that he was aged about 60 years. Co- accused Shiv Binod Singh was granted bail by this Court on 13.9.2010. Prayer for bail of co-accused Shiv Binod Singh was also allowed considering the age. Keeping in view the fact that earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected, I do not consider it proper to re- examine the same and accordingly, prayer for bail is again rejected. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)