IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3340 of 2008 Date of Decision : 27.08.2009 Kesar Chand .....Petitioner versus Gian Dev Tayal and another .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Sachin Mittal, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This revision petition is directed by the petitioner-tenant against the order dated 22.5.2008, passed by the Rent Controller, Hisar, whereby his application for conducting urgent repairs in the demises premises has been dismissed. The sole issue, as appears from the impugned order, before the Rent Controller is as to whether the damage has been caused in the building by the respondent-landlord intentionally or it has been automatically or naturally damaged in routine? The Rent Controller has disposed of the petitioner's application after observing that his prayer shall be considered at the final stage. C.R. No.3340 of 2008 2 No error of jurisdiction has been committed by the Rent Controller for the obvious reason that the repairs can be allowed to be carried out only if the petitioner-tenant succeeds to make out a case under Section 12 of the Act and/or establishes by adducing evidence that the damage has been caused intentionally by the respondent-landlord. The Rent Controller shall deal with the said issue specifically and make an endeavour to decide the petition at the earliest. The revision petition stands disposed of accordingly. 27-08-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE