IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.CHELAMESWAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN FRIDAY, THE 8TH OCTOBER 2010 / 16TH ASWINA 1932 RP.No. 864 of 2010 -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WA.1232/2010 Dated 20/08/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/APPELLANT: ------------------------------------- ANISH ISMAIL , AGED 26 YEARS, S/O. ISMAIL RAWTHER, KANDAMKULATHU HOUSE, VAIPUR, KOTTANGAL VILLAGE, MALLAPPALLY TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.SETHUNATH RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ---------------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANIMALA POLICE STATION. BY SENIOR GOVT. PLEADER, SMT. K. MEERA. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: J.Chelameswar, C.J. & P.N. Ravindran, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P. No. 864 of 2010 IN W.A.No. 1232 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 8th day of October, 2010 O R D E R Ravindran, J. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the review petitioner. We have also gone through the pleadings and the materials on record. In this review petition, what the petitioner really seeks is a re-hearing of the delay condonation petition. On the averments in the affidavit filed in support of the delay condonation petition, the order passed by us dismissing the delay condonation petition cannot be said to be vitiated by any error apparent on the face of the record. The Review Petition fails and is accordingly dismissed. J.Chelameswar, Chief Justice. P.N. Ravindran, Judge. ttb