HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.5411 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.03.2011 **** Pal Singh & Anr. . . . . Petitioners VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. DS Sobti, Advocate for the petitioners ***** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioners have a dispute in relation to the estate left by late Jagdish Kaur who was an NRI. It is the conceded position that civil litigation between the parties is already pending. The petitioners now claim that they have imminent danger to their lives and liberty at the hands of respondent No.4 who is a senior Police Officer and is siding with the opposite party. The petitioners are said to have made certain complaints against respondents No.4 on 5th /12th & 29th April, 2010 (Annexure P7 to P9, respectively) but no action having been allegedly taken that they have approached this Court. (2). Having heard learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the material on record, no definite opinion can be formed by this Court regarding the alleged misuse of powers by respondent No.4. (3). Be that as it may, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the Director General of Police, Punjab to look into and dispose of the complaints said to have been sent by the petitioners, as early as possible but not later than two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (4). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 25.03.2011 Vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge