WPMS No. 92 of 2010 H on ’ble B.S.Ver m a ,J Mr. D.S. Patni, Advocate and Mr. Mohit Maulekhi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Addl. C.S.C. for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner has informed to the Court that in view of the interim order passed by this Court 01-02-2010, the writ petition has become infructuous. Since the license agreement has been executed to category ‘E’ and ‘J’. In view of the statement of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. All pending applications stand disposed of accordingly. (B.S. Ver m a , J ) MK 08-02-2010