IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4565 OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.2176 OF 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s iorders or directions and Registrar’s orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mr.M.S.Topkar for petitioner. Ms.P.M.Palshikar for Respondent. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 09.03.2007 PC : 1. Heard advocates appearing for the parties. The application made by the applicant u/s 75 of the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 has been rejected on merits and it is held that the establishment of the applicant is covered by the provisions of the said Act. In view of findings recorded in the impugned order, interim relief cannot be granted. Hence application for interim relief is rejected. It is, however, made clear that all payments which may be made by the applicant on the basis of the impugned demand to the respondent Corporation, will be subject to the final outcome of the appeal. (A.S.OKA, J.)