IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CASE NO.: C.R. No.5916 of 2003 DATE OF DECISION: May 19, 2009 SUKHDEV SINGH & OTHERS ...PETITIONERS VERSUS SANT RAM ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA. PRESENT: MR. P.C. DHIMAN, ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER. NONE FOR THE RESPONDENT. ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, J.(ORAL) The landlord has filed this revision against the judgement of the Rent Controller, Chandigarh dated 17.5.2001, and the judgement passed by the Appellate Authority, Chandigarh dated 23.8.2003, vide dated his petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Restriction Act for eviction of the respondent from 1½ marlas of land situated in abadi deh of village Attawa has been dismissed. The landlord had filed petition for eviction against the tenant on the ground that he has not paid the rent of Rs.100/- per month. The Rent Controller found that the petitioner has not been able to prove that rent was not tendered by the tenant. The findings of the Rent Controller have been upheld by the Appellate Authority. I have perused the judgement of both the Courts and do not find any infirmity in the same. The landlord has failed to prove the relationship of landlord and tenant and also the fact that the tenant has not paid rent to him. In view of the above, I find no merit in the revision petition and the same is dismissed. May 19, 2009 (ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA) Gulati JUDGE