THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.139 of 2003 DATED: 22-07-2010 ORDER: This revision is filed by the petitioner-de facto complainant, questioning the judgment, dated 20-11-2002, passed in C.C.No.420 of 1999 by the learned IV Additional Metropolitan Magistrate-cum- Mahila Magistrate, Vijayawada. 2. On the basis of a report given by the petitioner herein, a case in Cr.No.46 of 1999 was registered by the police, I Town (L & O) police station, Vijayawada for the offence punishable under Section 498-A IPC and after investigation charge sheet was filed and the same was numbered as C.C.No.420 of 1999 on the file of the learned IV Additional Metropolitan Magistrate-cum-Mahila Magistrate, Vijayawada. 3. During the course of trial, P.Ws.1 to 8 were examined and Exs.P1 to 7 were marked. On behalf of the accused, D.Ws.1 and 2 were examined and Ex.D1 was marked. 4. Having analyzed the entire evidence, the learned Magistrate came to the conclusion that the respondents 2 to 10-A1 to A9 are not guilty of the said offence and accordingly acquitted them. Aggrieved thereby, the State filed an appeal and similarly, the petitioner herein-de facto complainant, who was examined as P.W.1, filed this revision. 5. When this matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the appeal filed by the State was dismissed by this Court. In the light of the said dismissal, this Court is of the view that this revision deserves no consideration. Further, in a revision filed by the de facto complainant, the maximum that can be done by this Court is to remand the matter for fresh trial in accordance with law. Even if this Court comes to the conclusion that the judgment is erroneous, it cannot reverse the said finding. Therefore, I see no merits in this revision. 6. Accordingly, Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. _______________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA,J 22nd July, 2010. Tsy