IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Revision No. 63 of 2009 Mustafa. ……….Revisionist. Versus Kaushar Bano. ....…. Respondent. Present : None for the revisionist. Mr. Pawan Mishra, Advocate for the respondent. Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J. 1. None has turned up on behalf of the revisionist, even in the second revised call while name of his Advocate appears on the list. Mr. Pawan Mishra, Advocate for the respondent Kaushar Bano is present, so this Court has given hearing to learned counsel for the respondent. 2. Delay condonation application no. 508 of 2009 has been moved to condone the delay of 340 days in filing the instant revision. In this revision, the challenge is to the judgment and order dated 07.03.2008 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Dehradun thereby granting the maintenance of Rs. 1500 per month to respondent Kaushar Bano under Section 125 Cr.P.C. with effect from the date of passing the order. 3. Having gone through the grounds, mentioned in the application, for condoning the delay, this Court feels that these are quite unsubstantial and non expounding. 4. This Court does not find any force in the grounds mentioned in the application, for condoning of such a huge delay in filing the revision, which is causing serious concern and stunting the course of survival of poor lady Kaushar Bano. 2 Thus, delay condonation application no. 508 of 2009 is rejected, consequently, the revision, being time barred, is also dismissed. Stay application no. 433 of 2009 and Misc. Application No. 506 of 2009 also stand disposed of. (Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.) 13.12.2011 SKS