IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 7825 of 2005 Between: Livestock Development Association, Shantipuram, A.P. Visakhapatnam Rep. by its Deputy Director A H. Frozen Semen Bull Station, Visakha Livestock Development Association, Dairy Farm, Visakhapatnam. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Commissioner of Appeals, Office of Chief Commissioner, Land Administration, Andhra pradesh, Hyderabad. 2 District Collector, Visakhapatnam District, Visakhapatnam. 3 Mandal Revenue Officer, Visakhapatnam (Rural) Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 4 Neeli Narayana, S/o. Dharmaiah, R/o. Chinagadilli Village of Visakhapatnam District. 5 Nelli Polaiah, S/o. Dharmaiah, R/o. Chinagadilli Village of Visakhapatnam District. 6 P. Geetha Devei, W/o. P.B. Kumar, R/o. Chinagadilli Village of Visakhapatnam District. 7 M. Lakshmi, W/o. Appa Rao, R/o. Chinagadilli Village of Visakhapatnam District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:DR.P.B.VIJAY KUMAR Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for Respondent Nos.4 to 7: MR. P.SRIRAGHURAM The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue any Writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of MANDAMUS declaring the Order dated 06-05-2004 in P1/445/2004 of the 1st Respondent herein as illegal, arbitrary and by setting aside the same.” At the hearing, Sri P.B.Vijay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this writ petition was ﬁled on an erroneous understanding of the Full Bench judgment of this Court in A.T.K.Venkata Thathacharyulu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh by its Secretary (Revenue Department) [1] , by which the Division Bench judgment of this Court in G.Papireddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh[2] was overruled. The learned counsel further submitted that in view of the said Full Bench judgment of this Court, the petitioner has alternative remedy of ﬁling a revision against order, dated 06.05.2004 passed by respondent No.1. He requested the Court to grant leave to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail the said remedy of revision. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. The parties shall maintain status quo for a period of two (2) weeks from today. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 26th AUGUST, 2008. Note: issue copy in three (3) days. B/o kvni [1] 1985 Andhra Law T imes Reports 279 (FB) [2] 1973 (2) APLJ 138