ssp 1 CAL 249 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.249 OF 2010 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (L) NO.18384 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4393 of 1993 Shashikant D. Utekar .....Applicant versus Headmistress, Dnyaneshwar Vidyalaya and Ors. ..... Respondents Smt.Ranjana Todankar, for the applicant. Mr.A.I.Patel, AGP, for the respondent-State. CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR& A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATE: 11th JANUARY, 2011. P.C. : 1. It is required to be noted that earlier the appeal was already withdrawn by the applicant with a view to file review petition against the original order. The order dated 27-07-2009 withdrawing the appeal is produced on record at page 10. Now subsequently, the applicant preferred review application before the learned Single Judge, which was rejected. Now the applicant wants to file appeal against the original order which is already withdrawn by the applicant. 2. In our view, this appeal itself is not maintainable, once it is already withdrawn. Learned counsel for the applicant states that she may ssp 2 CAL 249 of 2010 be allowed to file fresh appeal against the order of rejection of review order. On this aspect, we are not required to express any opinion. Since the appeal is not maintainable, the above civil application is not required to be entertained. Even otherwise, there is no ground to entertain such application of such an inordinate delay. Hence, civil application is rejected. ( A.A.SAYED, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )