(1) WP. 34.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 34 OF 2010 Gram Panchayat Mundwadi and anr. .. Petitioners VERSUS Sahebrao S/o Panditrao Misal .. Respondent Mr. P.F. Patni, Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. V.A. Deshmukh, Advocate h/f. Mr. V.D. Salunke, Advocate for the respondent ... CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 24TH JUNE, 2010 ORAL ORDER:- 1] Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2] Both the Courts came to the conclusion that prima facie case was made out by the respondent- plaintiff. Therefore, interim injunction was granted by the trial Court and the same has been confirmed by the appellate Court. 3] Mr. Patni strenuously argued that the open portion excluding 100' X 100' is the property of the Gram Panchayat and therefore injunction ought not have been clamped. It appears that the property was purchased by the respondent from one Kisan S/o Tukaram by virtue of sale deed dated 25.2.1986. The (2) WP. 34.2010 description shown in the sale deed, reveals that the house property in question is extended upto the lane and way of access situated on northern side. If the description by such boundary is considered, the plaintiff's case is prima facie, corroborated and as such the impugned order cannot be said to be perverse. In the exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction, therefore, no interference is called for. Petition is dismissed. 4] Trial of the suit is expedited and the trial Court is directed to decide the suit within a period of 9 months as far as possible, without being influenced by any of the interim order, the appellate order or observations of this Court. Sd/- [V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp