IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14735 of 2006 PROF.RAM CHANDRA PRASAD DEVA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 10.2.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ application pertains to replacement of the transformer as also giving him an electricity connection from the replaced transformer. Such grievance of the petitioner, on the basis of his averments made in the representation enclosed with this writ application, in the first instance, should be looked into by the Superintending Engineer of Samastipur Electricity Supply Circle. That being so, the petitioner may file a fresh representation to the said authority namely Superintending Engineer of Samastipur Electricity Supply Circle, who would be under obligation to dispose of the same within a period of three months from the date of its filing. It goes without saying that the consequential action will await the decision of Superintending Engineer of Samastipur Electricity Supply Circle. It is however made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of this case. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)