THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.29373 of 2009 ORDER: The 4th respondent is a Member of the 3rd respondent-Housing Society. A flat is said to have been allotted in favour of the 4th respondent. The latter, in turn, said to have entered into an agreement of sale with the petitioner. Disputes arose between the petitioner and the 4th respondent. She made a representation to the 3rd respondent to refer the dispute for arbitration to the 2nd respondent i.e. the Registrar of Societies, Hyderabad. This Writ Petition is filed for a direction to the 3rd respondent to make such reference. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner learned Government Pleader for Cooperation. The petitioner wants the dispute between herself and the 4th respondent to be referred to the 2nd respondent. A perusal of Section 61 of the A.P. Cooperative Societies Act discloses that in her capacity as a person claiming through a member of the Society, the petitioner can also raise such dispute. She does not have to depend upon a reference to be made by the 3rd respondent. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to raise a dispute before the 2nd respondent, if it is otherwise in accordance with law. There shall be no order as costs. _____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.21.04.2010. GJ