( 1 ) cria2517.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2517 OF 2010 Ramesh s/o. Madhavrao Ratnaparkhe .. Applicant Age. 52 years, Occ. Business, R/o. Ashok Nagar, Old Jalna, Tal. & Dist. Jalna. Versus 1. Kailash s/o. Akash Suparkar .. Respondents Age. 23 years, Occ. Agri., 2. Prakash s/o. Gopalrao Suparkar Age. 37 years, Occ. Agri., Both r/o. Sanjaynagar, Old Jalna, Tal. & Dist. Jalna. 3. The State of Maharashtra Mr. S.G. Magare, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Vijay Sharma, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. D.R. Kale, A.P.P. for respondent/State. WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2451 of 2008 1. Kailash s/o. Akash Suparkar, .. Applicants Age. 21 years, Occ. Agri., 2. Prakash s/o. Gopalrao Suparkar, Age. 36 years, Occ. Agri., Both R/o. Sanjay Nagar, Old Jalna, Tq. & Dist. Jalna. Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondents ( 2 ) cria2517.10 2. Ramesh s/o. Madhavrao Ratnaparkhe Age. 50 years, Occ. Business, R/o. Ashok Nagar, Old Jalna, Tq. & Dist. Jalna. Mr. Vijay Sharma, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. D.R. Kale, A.P.P. for respondent/State. Mr. S.G. Magare, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATED : 08.03.2011 P.C. :- 1. At the outset the Counsel appearing for the applicants i.e. Kailas and Prakash in Criminal Application No. 2451 of 2008, makes a statement that so far as prayer clause (B) in Criminal Application No. 2451 of 2008 is concerned i.e. “The FIR bearing crime No. I-38/2008 of Police Station Kadim Jalna, for the offences under sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 324 of I.P.C. and Sec. 3 (1) (x) of S.C., S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, be quashed and set aside”, he is not pressing said prayer. However, he submits that the applicants, namely, Kailas and Prakash are granted protection by this Court by order dated 30th July, 2008 and the same may be continued till the trial is concluded. ( 3 ) cria2517.10 2. The Counsel for the original complainant and applicant in Criminal Application No. 2517 of 2010 submits that if this Court vacates the interim relief granted by this Court on 21st January, 2009 by discharging the rule, his purpose would be fulfilled. 3. In view of aforesaid submission, I feel it appropriate to dispose of both Criminal Application Nos. 2517 of 2010 and 2451 of 2008 in the following terms:- 4. Since prayer clause (B) in the application No. 2451 of 2008 is not pressed by the applicants, as a result the stay granted by this Court in the proceedings pending before the concerned Court, so far it relates to offence punishable under section 3 (i) (x) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, stands vacated. The concerned Court before whom the proceedings are pending, is directed to proceed with the trial in accordance with the charge-sheet filed by the police. ( 4 ) cria2517.10 5. Rule granted in Criminal Application No. 2451 of 2008 stands discharged. However, the applicants are protected by this Court by order dated 30.04.2008 and the same protection would continue till final disposal of the trial. 6. Both the applications stand disposed of in above terms. [S.S. SHINDE,J.] snk/2011/MAR11/cria2517.10