IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12740 of 2009 SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH son of Rajdeo Singh resident of village Chaurashi P.S. Karai Pasuray District Nalanda. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18/05/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant. It has been submitted that the police found the allegation of offence under section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code true against the father of the petitioner only but the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance against the petitioner also. Learned counsel for the informant has said that in the F.I.R. a specific allegation has been made by the father of the deceased that this petitioner was seen with fire arm and after the occurrence he ran away with his own fire arm as well as the gun of his father, the co- accused. Considering the nature of the offence the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. If the petitioner surrenders in the court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa in connection with Hilsa (Karai) P.S. Case No. 459/08 within six weeks and seek regular bail, then his case should be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order. (Shiva Kirti Singh, ACJ.) AMIN