ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.3749 OF 2008 PETITION NO.3749 OF 2008 PETITION NO.3749 OF 2008 Sudhir Vitthal Kale ...Petitioner Vs. Sau.Suvarna Sudhir Kale ...Respondent. Mr.Kishor B.Vidya for the Petitioner. CORAM CORAM CORAM : R.V.MORE, J. : R.V.MORE, J. : R.V.MORE, J. DATED DATED DATED : 7th July, 2008 : 7th July, 2008 : 7th July, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard Mr.Vaidya, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. By the present Writ Petition the petitioner takes exception to the order of family court whereby an interim maintenance of Rs.2,000/- p.m. (Rupees two thousand only) is granted to the Respondent. 2. The Respondent wife claimed that the Petitioner is serving at Pirangut in Intech Group of Conversant as a Design Officer and earns Rs.18,000/- to Rs.20,000/- per month. In addition to this, the wife has also claimed that the Petitioner gets an amount of Rs.45,000/- p.a. (Rupees forty five thousand only) from agricultural land. The contentions of the ( 2 ) Respondent wife however, are denied by the Petitioner. The family Court, held that the Petitioner is able bodied person. It is not the case of the Petitioner that he is physically unfit, unable to earn and consequently unable to pay anything to the Respondent. Taking into account over all circumstances, the Family Court fixed the interim maintenance @ Rs.2,000/- p.m. 3. After hearing the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner, I do not see any reason to interfere in the amount of maintenance granted by the Family Court vide its impugned order. No ground is made out to exercise my jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 4. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed, with no order as to costs. ( R. V. MORE, J.) R. V. MORE, J.) R. V. MORE, J.)