IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-31661 of 2008 Date of Decision: December 02, 2008 Sunder … Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND Present : Mr. Hoshiar Singh Jaswal, Advocate, for the petitioner. *** S.D. Anand, J (Oral) Crl. Misc. No.55657 of 2008 Allowed, as prayed for. Crl. Misc. No. M-31661 of 2008 Crl. Misc. No. M-31661 of 2008 The parole plea of the petitioner – prisoner came to be rejected on the apparently on specious plea that “there is no specific reason for grant of parole.” The impugned order (Annexure P/1) is oblivious of the fact that the petitioner – prisoner applied for the grant of parole for effecting house repair. The averment, in the context, was that the minor brother of the petitioner – prisoner is not in a position to get the repairs effected and there is no male member of the family to get the job done. Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Mr. S.S. Mor, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the State. The petition shall stand disposed of with a direction to the Competent Authority to pass an order afresh, in the light of the facts noticed above, within one month from today. The release shall, of course, be subject to the furnishing of adequate surety etc. by the petitioner – prisoner. It will be for the State counsel to communicate the order to the Competent Authority. Copy of the order be given to the learned State counsel under the signatures of the Court Secretary. December 02, 2008 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 2 Crl. Misc. No. M-31661 of 2008 3