1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.161 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1087 OF 2005 Tarun Devidas Patil ...Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ...Respondents Mr. Ganesh Gole,, Advocate for Appellant Mr. P.S. Hingorani, A. P. P for Respondent State CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. DATED: 13TH JULY, 2007 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel Mr. Gole for the Applicant and heard the learned A. P. P for the Respondent State. As far as the grievance of the Petitioner is concerned the same relates to furlough and parole leave. The Applicant has raised grievance that the Jail Authorities are not considering and deciding the applications for furlough and parole properly which results in injustice to the prisoners. 2. Mr. Borulkar the learned Government Pleader had tendered before the Court a circular issued by the 2 Government dated 19th August, 1992. Over and above we also perused the Bombay Prisons (Furlough and Parole) Rule, 1959 and the aforesaid circular dated 19th August, 1992 issued by the Home Department, State of Maharashtra. It is made clear that in case if the aforesaid Rules and the circulars are not followed, the concerned Police Officers and the Jail Authorities will be strictly dealt with and will be held personally liable, and disciplinary action will be initiated against such Officer. 3. Mr. P.S. Hingorani concerned A.P.P assures that this order will be communicated to all the concerned Jail Authorities and Police Authorities, so that these Rules and aforesaid circulars are strictly implemented. 4. The application stands disposed off. (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)