IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.30248 OF 2011 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: OCTOBER 17, 2011 Himmat Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.R.L.Sharma, Advocate, for Mr.Sewa Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner says that he will not press this petition at this stage and in the meantime may move an application before the Sessions Court for trial of complaint as well as criminal case at one place, which presently are taking place at Patiala and Rajpura respectively. The petitioner otherwise also would be at liberty to point out the evidence before the trial Court to show that any offence other than 306 IPC is made out and there is a need to amend the charge accordingly. The trial Court in this regard has ample power under the Code of Criminal Procedure, which can be invoked and further grievance can be made against any such order, if passed. Dismissed as not pressed. October 17, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE