IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17700 of 2009 1. RUKMINI KUMARI W/O MUKESH CHANDRA CHOUDHARY R/O VILL +P.O. MADHOPUR, P.S.BIBHUTIPUR, DISTT- SAMASTIPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY GOVT. OF BIHAR , STATE HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE SECRETARY AND THE COMMISSIONER HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR , PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE SAMASTIPUR 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION SAMASTIPUR 5. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER SAMASTIPUR 6. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER BIBHUTIPUR, SAMASTIPUR 7. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENTION OFFICER BIBHUTIPUR, SAMASTIPUR 8. THE MUKHIYA -CUM -CHAIRMAN OF APPOINTMENT COMMITTEE GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, BIBHUTIPUR, NORTH 9. THE MUKHIYA -CUM -CHAIRMAN OF APPOINTMENT COMMITTEE GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, ALAMPUR, KODARIA 10. THE MUKHIYA -CUM-CHAIRMAN OF APPOINTEMENT COMMITTEE GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, BORIYA 11. THE MUKHIYA -CYN CHAIRMAN OF APPOINTMENT COMMITTEE GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, HARKINGHPUR, KUMHIRA 12. THE MUKHIYA -CUM -CHAIRMAN OF APPOINTMENT COMMITTEE PANCHAYAT RAJ, GADH SIJAI 13. THE MUKHIYA-CUM CHAIRAMAN OF APPOINTMENT COMMITTEE PANCHAYAT RAJ, CHORA TABHKA 14. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY-CUM-PANCHAYAT SEVAK BIBHUTIPUR, NORTH 15. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY-CUM-PANCHAYAT SEVAK ALAMPUR, KODARIA 16. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY-CUM-PANCHAYAT SEVAK BORIA 17. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY-CUM -PANCHAYAT SEVAK null KHAS TABHKA SOUTH 18. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY-CUM-PANCHAYAT SEVAK HASSINGHPUR, KUHIRA 19. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY-CUM-PANCHAYAT SEVAK GADH SISAI 20. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY-CUM PANCHAYAT SEVAK CHORA TABHAKA ----------- - 2 - 2 13.4.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the State. Petitioner had applied for the post of Prakhand Teacher in the year 2006. She was not appointed. It transpires that she did not participate in the counseling. For three years, she did not raise any objection before any Forum either regarding non-consideration of her candidature or non-issuance of any intimation, due to which she failed to participate in the counselling. For the first time in the year 2009, she started filing objections/ representations before different authorities. The Appellate Forum has also not entertained his objection/appeal, since it was not filed within the time. I do not find any merit in this application, as 2006 Rules provided a specific forum for filing such objection under Rule 18, within the time specified. Petitioner did not avail that opportunity. Her belated objection after three years cannot be entertained. This application is dismissed. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.kumar