1 Cri.Appln.No.1274/2011 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1274/2011 (Chaturasing s/o Gurnamsing Tak Vs. The State of Maharashtra ) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Manjusha Nayan,Adv. for Applicant; Mr. KM Suryawanshi, APP for State. *** CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 18 th April, 2011. ... 1) Heard finally. 2) The accused/applicant seeks bail in Crime No.189/2009 registered at Majalgaon police Station district Beed for an offence under Sections 395 and 397 of IPC. 3) Learned Counsel submits that the accused/applicant is in custody from 27.1.2010, no progress as yet in the matter. Even if earlier application is rejected, According to her, the accused/applicant deserves bail. 4) As against the above submissions, learned APP submits, it is not only the present case which the accused has faced, he was convicted in Sessions Case No.33/2009 by order dated 27th April, 2010 and would be undergoing said sentence. 2 Cri.Appln.No.1274/2011 5) On re-visiting the facts of the present case, the gold ornaments, which were robed, for which dacoity was committed, are recovered from the custody of the accused/applicant, total recovery of gold ornaments in the heist was around Rs.13,00,000/-. The ornaments are identified by the complainant, no explanation of the same was given at appropriate time by the accused/applicant. 6) Considering these aspects, no case to inform change of circumstances to review or re-call the earlier order of rejection of bail. The application lacks merit, dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/