IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 924 of 2009 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 12/12/2008 in WP NO : 27035 OF 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: The Management, A.P. Dairy Development Cooperative Federation Ltd., Lalapet, Hyderabad. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 Smt. Shivamma W/o. K. Yellaiah, Coee No. 1251 Rep. by Authorized Rep. Mr. Sudershan Singh C/o. Shelter , H.No. 3- 4-472, Barkatpura, Hyderabad. 2 The Additional Industrial Cum Additional Labour Court Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:MR.M.DILIP RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.K.K.CHAKRAVARTHY The Court made the following : HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI & HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 924 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) The present writ appeal is filed by the appellant against the order of the learned single Judge passed in W.P.M.P.No:35417 of 2008 in W.P.No:27035 of 2008 on 12.12.2008. The appellant is the wirt petitioner, which has filed the writ petition. While entertaining the W.P.M.P on 12.12.2008, the learned single Judge has passed the following order: “This is an application to suspend order dated 12.2.2008 in M.P.No:26 of 2005 on the file of the Additional Industrial Tribunal Labour Court, Hyderabad. Heard Sri M.Dilip Rao and perused the record. Since the writ petition is already admitted, I find balance of convenience in favour of thepetitioner and as such the impugned order is suspended subject to the petitioner depositing 50% of the amount to the credit of M.P.No:26 of 2005 on the file of the Additional Industrial Tribunal cum Additional Labour Court, Hyderabad, within a period of six (6) Weeks from today. On such deposit, the respondent No:1 is entitled to withdraw the same without furnishing security.” At this stage, the present appeal is preferred by the writ petitioner. Heard and perused the material available on record. The order impugned herein, which is a conditional order, is not passed on any merits of the case. The imposition of condition in the order impugned, is purely on the exercise of discretion, which is just and reasonable. Therefore, we feel that it is not a fit case to entertain the writ appeal at this stage of the proceedings. Hence, this writ appeal is devoid of merits and thereby, the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, this writ appeal is dismissed. No costs. __________________________ Justice T. MEENA KUMARI ________________________ Justice SANJAY KUMAR Dated 21st July, 2009. Dvs HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI & HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 924 of 2009 (Judgment of the Division Bench delivered by Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) Dated 21st July, 2009.