IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24820 of 2010 1. SUKHDEO MANDAL 2. BAIJNATH MANDAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR 03. 27.04.2011 It has been submitted in the heading under ‘Orders an office notes’ that in the second paragraph in the third line of the order dated 20.9.2010, it has been inadvertently left the word ‘In’ just after the word ‘love’. Let the order dated 20.9.2010 be re-typed and add the word ‘In’ just after the word ‘love’. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the state. Informant’s daughter disappeared with co-accused, Dilip Singh and petitioners are alleged for having conspiracy. According to the learned counsel, really she was love in with Dilip Singh which she corroborated in her statement under section 164 Cr. P. C. about her love and eloping with co-accused, Dilip Singh. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Forbesganj P. S. Case No.350 of 2009 above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C. J.M., Araria subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.) 2