..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.554 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.493 OF 2008 Amol Tanaji Chavan. ..Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .... Mr.D.R.Rananaware, Adv. for the Applicant. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 5th June, 2008. DATED : 5th June, 2008. DATED : 5th June, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant-orig.accused No.4 and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant-orig. accused No.4 has been convicted under Sections 306 and 498-A r/w. 34 of IPC. The applicant is now seeking bail. 3. The learned Counsel for the applicant states that the applicant was on bail during the trial and he has not misused the liberty granted to him. This statement has not been controverted by the prosecution. The learned Counsel for the ..(2).. applicant has further stated that the maximum sentence imposed upon the applicant is RI for three years and the appeal is not likely to be heard within the said time. Moreover he has submitted that applicant has a good case on merit. On perusal of the evidence, it is seen that the allegations are mainly against Vikas and Sachin. 4. Looking to the above facts and the evidence on record, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. 5. The applicant - Amol Tanaji Chavan be released on bail in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rs.Twenty Five Thousand Only) with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. 6. Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)