Date of Decision : 26th July, 1996. Special Civil Application Nos. 2832 and 3567 of 1985. For Approval and Signature The Honourable Mr.Justice C.K. Thakkar 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - no. 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? - no. 3. Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of judgment? - no. 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder? - no. 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? - no. Spl.C.A.No.2832 of 1985 :- Mr.N.D. Nanavati, Advocate, with Mr.R.M. Chhaya, Advocate, for the Petitioner. Mr.M.B. Gandhi, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr.Y.F. Mehta, AGP, for respondent No.2. Spl.C.A.No.3567 of 1985 :- Mr.M.B. Gandhi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.N.D. Nanavati, Advocate, with Mr.R.M. Chhaya, Advocate, for the Respondent. Coram : C.K. THAKKAR, J. ( 26th July, 1996 ) Oral Judgment :- Mr.Chhaya, for Mr.Nanavati, appearing for the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Morbi (petitioner in Special Civil Application No.2832 of 1985 and respondent in Special Civil Application No.3567 of 1985) states that the matter is amicably settled between the parties. he also produces Resolutions Nos. 6 and 7 passed by the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, which is ordered to be kept on record. He states that neither of the petitions survives in view of the statement. Hence, both the petitions are ordered to be disposed of. Rule is discharged. No order as to costs. ***** (apj)