IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 27TH NOVEMBER 2006 / 6TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 WP(C).No. 14784 of 2005(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ MARGARET JOSEPH, W/O.MATHEW, AGED 32 YEARS, LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, LUTHERN HIGH SCHOL, SOUTH ARYAD, ALAPPUZHA-6. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, TRIVADNRUM-14. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, ALAPPUZHA. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ALAPPUZHA. 5. THE CORPORATE MANAGER, LUTHERAN SCHOOLS, CORPORATE MANAGEMENT OF LUTHERN SCHOOL INDIA EVANGELICAL LUTHERN CHURCH, P.O.PEROORKADA, TRIVADNRUM-695 005. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.D.ANIL KUMAR ADV.SRI.GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/11/2006 ALONG WITH CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. ------------------------------------------ W.P.(C).NOs.14784/05, 23317, 23408 & 24855 OF 2006 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of November,2006. JUDGMENT Case of the petitioners is as follows: Petitioners were appointed as Teachers in the schools run by the corporate management of Lutheran schools. Their grievance is that their appointments have not yet been approved. It is stated to be on account of the management dispute. They rely on the judgment of this court which is produced as Ext.P8 in W.P.C.No.24855/06. The said judgment has produced in all the writ petitions. According to them the manager of Lutheran Schools was approved vide Ext.P5 in W.P.(C) No.24855/06 and the writ petition challenging the same was disposed of by Ext.P8 judgment. 2. I feel that petitioners should approach the alternate forum available to them. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners will file the revision petitions before the Government under Rule 92 of Chapter XIV A of K.E.R. 3. I heard Adv.Sri.Gopalakrishnan Nair appearing for the fourth respondent in all the cases and the learned Government Pleader also. 4. In such circumstances, these writ petitions are disposed of as follows: WP(C)No.14784/05 & connected cases 2 If the petitioners file revision petitions under Rule 92 of Chapter XIV A of K.E.R. before the first respondent within a period of three weeks from today, first respondent will consider the same and take a decision in accordance with law after hearing the petitioners and all the affected parties within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the revision petition. It will be open to the petitioners to rely on Ext.P6 and Ext.P8 judgment in W.P.(C)No.24855/06. Writ petitions are disposed of as above. K.M.JOSEPH. JUDGE. sv.