IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10827 of 2005 Lallan Prasad, son of Brahmdeo Mahto, resident of village Govasa Sheikhpura, P.S. Pandarak, Distt. Patna. --------- Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Patna. 2. The Block Development Officer, Pandarak Block, Barh, Distt. Patna. 3. Girija Prasad Singh, Panchayat Sewak, Pandarak Block, Barh, Distt. Patna. ------ Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2. 14.11.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State are present. The prayer in the writ petition is for a direction upon the respondents to allot a house to the petitioner under the Indira Awas Yojana scheme as well as the PMRY scheme. Various irregularities have been alleged in such work. Before addressing the Court on merits, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of passage of time new persons are occupying the office in the Panchayat concerned as well as in the office of the local authorities. In that view of the matter, he seeks liberty to approach the concerned authorities afresh with regard to the grievance raised in the present writ application. Learned counsel for the State does not oppose the prayer. In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to move before the appropriate authority afresh with regard to the grievance as 2 raised in the present writ application. If such a representation is filed within two months from today, the concerned respondents shall take a decision in accordance with law within a period of two months thereafter. S.Ali ( Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)