IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA. CWP No. 5082 of 2009. Decided on: 22.2.2010. Babita. …Petitioner. versus HRTC and others. …Respondents. Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioners : Mr. Rakesh Chandel, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. The writ petitioner has filed the writ petition with following prayer: “1. That the respondent-Corporation may kindly be directed to give the regularization to the petitioner with effect from due date, i.e. 7.4.2000, on the completion of eight years of continuous service as per the policy/guidelines framed for the purpose of regularization.” It is seen that the case of the petitioner was once examined as per Annexure P-4. She was regularized w.e.f. 13.5.2002 though the initial stand was that regularization could only be w.e.f. 3.8.2004 (Annexure P-5). Now the contention of the petitioner is Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- that she is entitled for regularization w.e.f. 7.4.2000. It is further submitted that the similarly situated workers have been regularized so. It is for the petitioner to point out such incident, if any, before the first respondent in the event of filing representation, if any, being filed before the first respondent. The matter be duly examined by the first respondent and in case the petitioner is similarly situated, the petitioner shall not be discriminated. The needful in this regard shall be done within a period of two months on the production of the copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. ( Justice Kurian Joseph ), Chief Justice. ( R.B. Misra ), February 22, 2010 Judge. ( tr/ks)