IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2239 of 2009(O&M) Date of decision: 21.12.2009 Raghubir Singh ......Petitioner(s) Versus Gurnam Kaur and others ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Mahesh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) CM No.29883-CII of 200 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. COCP No.2239 of 2009 The grievance of the petitioner before this Court is that despite the fact that vide order dated 8.2.2000 passed in RSA No.1277 of 1999, status quo regarding alienation with regard to the suit property, was ordered to be maintained and further that the Financial Commissioner, Punjab vide order dated 5.9.2007 had stayed the impugned order in ROR No.699 of 2007, the respondents are proceeding with the partition proceedings and thus, are guilty of committing contempt as per provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act. The argument raised by the petitioner is frivolous. The stay of alienation does not include herein the stay of further proceedings before the Revenue Authorities. The petitioner has failed to place on record the facts with regard to violation of the order passed by the Financial Commissioner vide Annexure P-2. From the facts as mentioned in the present petition, it seems that the aforesaid revision petition was dismissed in default on 26.11.2008 and was restored on 29.7.2009 and the partition proceedings have taken COCP No.2239 of 2009(O&M) -2- place during the aforesaid period. Thus, I find no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek any other remedy available to him in accordance with law. December 21, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE