@ HEGH CGURT 9F CHEATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 'Wi‘it PeiitioniS‘p N0. 33 {$2338 1. Salikram SlLrivastava S/o Shxi Ganesh Lal Shrivastava aged about 60 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Audhiyarkhor, Block Bemeiara’ DistL Durg (CG). Chandrasheklmr Pandey§ S/Q 3111i Ralnkhiiawan Pandcy aged about 53 years Asstt. Tcachcr, Govt. Primary School, Dhaneli. Block Bemetara, Distt. Durg (CG). 3. Gopal Singh Bhuval S/o Shri Khedu Singh Bhuval Age abou 61 years, Hoad Mastor, Govt. Primary School Bemetar Distt. Durg (CG). 4. Buland Sin§1 Vanna S/o Shri Fab'ou Sing}; Vcxma, Age about 57 years, Head Mter, Govt. Master, Govt. Primy Shool, Jaitpuri, Block Bemetara, Distt. Burg (CG). U1 o i’E-TETIGNERS kl Keshav Ram Vanna. S/o Shri Ramhar Velma Age about. 60 years, Head Master, Govt. Primary Schol, Karlikanpa, Block Bcmetara, Dim. Durg (CG). : 1. State of Clmiiisgarh through Socrotary, Education & Tn'lxal Depamnont DKS Bhawaix. Raipur (CG). 2. District Education Oiiicor Bernemra, DiStt. Durg (CG). (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 O THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) ' ' ' z Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the peitionem. Sim. Binu Shanna, Panel Lawyer for the State!respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 3 fFehmary, 20%) 1. The petitioners were appoited on 26.03.1974 Assistant Teher on n a1 ac fixed pay of I33. 100f-. Alter eonipletioti of probaon, the petioners ti ti were grtted regular pay sce. ar al 2.. Learned counsel appeariug for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in the case is asto whether, the petitioners are elititled to regular pay scale wef. the date of initial appointment or after completion of probation period. The issue involved. herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in OA No. 2445/89 (Madhulcant \i? l A;A " l " w t a, as ar c ad VERSUS RE§PONDFNTS Ll F ($3: Honble Mr. Satish K. Agmhotri, J.) Besont t m o 3. Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of MP. & Others), wherein it was held that the similarly Siiuated teachers are entitlad to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appaintmem. The matter was takeil up t0 Hon'ble Supreme Couri. The appeal was diSnLissmi by the Hou‘ble Supreme Court uphnldLng iLe decisim- 0f the Tribunal t0 the effect that tha Teacli6rS/Agsista11t Tgachers are. entitled to regular pay scalé from dale of hiitlal appaimmgnt. 4, Learned cotmsgl appearing for the patitionets submits that this Court While cogsider'mg tha same issue in Ram Kumar Sahu and others Vs. Slate Gen/t. of Clihattisgarh and anothar in Writ Petition (S) N0. 813 of 2007 hy ordsar dated 12.02.2007, has granted regular pay scale w.e.f. the data afinitial appointment. Leamed ceumel appear'mg for the parties jointly submit iliaf this case is squarely covered by the. decisioi- of tlLs Court in the ease of Rain Kumar Saliu and others Vs. State Govt. of Chlmitisgarh and another (Supra). However, the state is at liberty to verify the facts of anpointment asto wlietherthe case of the petitioner is similar to that of the order dated 12.02.2007 passed by this court hi WP. (S) No. 813 0f2007 (Supra). ON are entitled for regular pay seale with effect hem the date of initial appointment, subject to verification ofthe facts. No order asto costs. IJI hi View of that this petition is allowed iii the same terms i.e. petitioners sw- Sacish K. Agnihon’i Judge 3‘”’. / A.y-v v /