pvr 1 1404--1405a96-93-10 IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1404 OF 2010 IN APPEAL (LODG) NO.96 OF 2010 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.148 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2144 OF 2009 Shaikh Mohd.Iqbal Mohd.Ishaque ...Appellant vs. 1.Shaikh Shafi F.M.Dilliwala & Ors....Respondents AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1405 OF 2010 IN APPEAL (LODG) NO.93 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2144 OF 2009 Shaikh Mohd.Iqbal Mohd.Ishaque ...Appellant vs. 1.Shaikh Shafi F.M.Dilliwala & Ors....Respondents --- Mr.Niranjan Shimpi, for Appellant. --- pvr 2 1404--1405a96-93-10 CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATED: 26th April,2011 P.C.: 1. These notices of motion are taken out for condonation of delay. The appeal being appeal (lodg) no.96 of 2010 is filed against the order by which the learned Single Judge has held that Writ Petition (Lodg) No.446 of 2009 is maintainable on the original side of this Court and the appeal bearing appeal (lodg) no.93 of 2010 is filed against the order by which the learned Single Judge has admitted the said writ petition. In our opinion, these orders do not amount to judgment within the meaning of Clause 15 of the Letters Patent and therefore, the appeals are not maintainable. The learned Counsel appearing for appellant relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case Shah Babulal Khimji Vs. Jayabhen D.Kania & Anr., (1981)4 Supreme Court Cases 8 . Perusal of that judgment pvr 3 1404--1405a96-93-10 also shows that an order of such nature would not amount to judgment. The notices of motion and appeals are, therefore, disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J.) (ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.)