THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CRIMINAL PETITION NO.12092 OF 2010 ORDER: The petitioners-A1 and A2 and the second respondent- de facto complainant are present. Sri Syed Lateef, the learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri R. Satyanarayana, the learned counsel for the second respondent are also present. 2. It is stated by both the parties that they have resolved the dispute amicably outside the Court and they are now living together happily. They also stated that they executed a mutual understanding document incorporating the terms of compromise. In pursuance of the said compromise, the second respondent is withdrawing the complaint against the petitioners as she is no longer interested in prosecuting the petitioners in C.C.No.1284 of 2010 (old C.C.No.683 of 2007) on the file of the XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. 3. Having regard to the fact that both parties have settled the matrimonial dispute amicably and entered into a compromise and as the second respondent is not interested in prosecuting the petitioners any more, it is considered that no useful purpose would be served by continuing the proceedings in C.C.No.1284 of 2010 on the file of XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. It is therefore considered to be a fit case to invoke inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash further proceedings in C.C.No.1284 of 2010 on the file of the XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, against the petitioners. 4. In the circumstances, further proceedings in C.C.No.1284 of 2010 on the file of the XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, against the petitioners are liable to be quashed and are accordingly quashed. 5. In the result, the criminal petition is disposed of as stated above. ____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J Date: 03.12.2010 bud