Civil Revision No. 2393 of 2007 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2393 of 2007 Date of decision: 29.04.2009. Jinda Hassan Petitioner Versus Matloob & another ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Wazir Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. C.B.Goel, Advocate for the respondent. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. It is apparent from the record that the plaintiff-petitioner filed the impugned suit in order to obtain invalidation of the sale deed dated 12.10.2004 (executed by him) on an averment that “the defendants did not pay even a single penny at the time of execution of the sale deed and promised to give the sale consideration after returning at home but even after returning at home the defendants did not pay sale consideration to the plaintiffs and kept on prolonging the matter of the payment of sale consideration on one pretext or the other”. It was in the light of the above averment that the learned Trial Judge allowed a plea filed by the defendants-respondents under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. and directed the plaintiff-petitioner to pay ad- Civil Revision No. 2393 of 2007 -2- **** valorem court fee. The learned counsel for the plaintiff-petitioner has not been able to invite my attention to any factor which may be supportive of his presentation for invalidation of the impugned order. The present is a pure and simple case in which the plaintiff-petitioner applied for the setting aside of a registered sale deed executed by him. In such an eventuality, ad-valorem court fee is payable on the plaint. In the light of the fore-going discussion, the petition is held to be denuded of merit and is ordered to be dismissed. The parties, through their learned counsel, are directed to appear before the learned Trial Court on 12.5.2009. April 29, 2009 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge