0% c;§‘\ % IN THE HIGH COURT OF_CHHATTISGARH‘AT BILASPUR ._ / w.P. No. 1358 /2oo4 xy PETITIONERS Tulsi Ram Aditya, S/o. Late Shri RESPONDENT l. Siate of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretary Department of Fisheries and Co-oparative Societies, D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). Additional Director, Matasya Udyog, District Janigir—Champa (C.G.). The Collector, District ]anjgir-Champa (Co). The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, District ]anjgir—€h§mpa (C.G.). The Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, District Janigir-Champa (C.G.). Kg“. Nakched Prasad Aditya, Aged about x" ',. 27 years, President of . . x: y \e7’>.-’Q§9" Lakshsmaneshwar Machhwa Samiti, £49” x V ," 2v- ' R/o. Village Majhipara, Kharod, Tahsil $r§o4g(" Pamgarh, District Janjgir - Champa. $' 6:5(3 \. ‘ ab Vaa" VERsus mmm€ww5‘FFL 9 8/3330” Wu. v XI—HC-22 mm petitioner has made a representationy , respondent no.6. Then the but the same was turned down by respondent no.2 (Annexuxe 13/5). Agg‘n'eved by the imp ugned order, the petitioner has made a written complaint before respondent No.3 towards which a letter was written to Additional Registrar (Io—operative Society to take Petitioner has also made a representation (Anne'xure’ P/7) to the Minister concerned on 26/08] 2003 but the same was received on 04/09] 2003, whereas application of respondent no.6 was received on 02/09] 2003. Therefore, the action of respondents is arbitrary, capricious and irrational. I have heard learned counsel for respondents; No. Perusal of Annexule counsel for the petitioner as well as 1t05. PIS issued by the Deputy Collector reveals that the case of the petitioner cannot be considered for regisuation as petitioner/S whereas the petitioner has the provisions laid down 1 Society and requested for petition. . Learned counsel for w respondent authority is no Order to favour respondent registered as Society. Having heard the lear. Jed counsel for the parties and having mstances of theease, respondent no.4 i i regard to the facts and circu appropriate action in the matter. ociety is not eligible for registration mentioned that he has complied with mder the Act for registration of the quashment ,of tif- same in this writ 'he petitioner argued that deliberately t registering the petitioner-Society in no.6. However, respondent no.6 is ‘ . WPI§?K/O Wm Wu wt 200 . mm WW fa”!W W m mmm 111%?! C 1) $ am m mufév is dimcted to consider the cast of the petitioner and decide his application in accordance with W Within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of this order. In the meantime, till the decision of that application the auction o the pond be kept in abeyance. With the afomsaid obse ations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. C nsequently, M.W.P.No.1756/2004 and I.A.No. 4577/ 2004 stand d' posed of. ‘Certined copy as per rules 1 L.C. Bhadoo i Sdl- gudge z r r l