IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 304 of 2004 (M/B) Kamlesh Yadav S/o Mohabali Yadav Presently working as conductor in Kathgodam, Kumaon region, Uttaranchal …………. Petitioners. Versus 1. Principal Secretary, Uttaranchal Transport Corporation, Dehradun. 2. Uttaranchal Transport Corporation through Managing Director, Dehradun. 3. Regional Manager, Kumaon Region, Nainital. 4. Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation through its Managing Director, Parivahan Bhawan, Lucknow. 5. Union of India through Joint Secretary, Ministry of Road Transport, Highways, New Delhi. ………. Respondents. Sri S.S. Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri A. N. Sharma, Advocate for respondents 1, 2 and 3. Sri Rami Srivastava, Advocate for respondent no. 4. None for respondent no.5. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Sri S.S. Yadav, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri A. N. Sharma, the learned counsel for respondents 1, 2 and 3. Sri Rami Srivastava, learned counsel for respondent no. 4. None for respondent no.5. 2. Sri Yadav, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the fact that the petitioner Kamlesh Yadav during the pendency of the petition has been relieved form the Uttaranchal Transport Corporation to join Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, the writ petition now has become infructuous. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 08.06.2006 08.06.2006 A