IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND APRIL 2008 / 13TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 6697 of 2008(V) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- GEORGE MOAN, S/O.GEORGE ALIAS BABY, PANAKKALODY HOUSE, THENGODE P.O., KAKKANAD, COCHIN-682 030. BY ADV. SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM, COLLECTORATE, KAKKANAD, COCHIN-682 030. 3. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT COCHIN, ERNAKULAM. 4. M/S.SKYLINE BUILDERS, SKYLINE HOUSE, 41/349 B, RAJAJI ROAD, KOCHI-35, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING PARTNER JOSEPH PHILIP. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. M.R. SABU BY ADV. SRI.V.V.ASOKAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/04/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.6697/2008 V APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF PARTITION DEED DTD. 22/02/1992. EXT.P2: COPY OF ASSIGNMENT DEED EXECUTED BY SRI. SANTHOSH GEORGE AND SRI. SURESH GEORGE, IN FAVOUR OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P3: COPY OF LETTER, DTD. 7/01/2008, ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, ERNAKULAM TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P4: COPY OF REPRESENTATION DTD. 14/01/2008 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P5: COPY OF LETTER DTD. 12/02/2008 ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, ERNAKULAM TO THE PETITIONER. /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) 6697 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated: APRIL 2, 2008 JUDGMENT The allegation in this writ petition is that the 4th respondent is filling up paddy filed in violation of the conditions in the Kerala Land Utilisation Order. 2. Petitioner has produced Ext.P4 which is a complaint allegedly filed before the 2nd respondent raising this allegation. In view of this, it is for the 2nd respondent to deal with the complaint. 3. Accordingly this writ petition is disposed of directing that on production of a copy of this judgment, the 2nd respondent shall take necessary action on Ext.P4 with notice and hearing to the 4th respondent. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-