IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 8157 of 1992 Date of decision : 03.05.2011 Lakhvir Singh ....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. P.S. Hundal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.S. Rawat, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No. 1. Mr. Amar Vivek, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned counsel has submitted that since petitioner has already retired from service after attaining the age of superannuation, so this writ petition has become infructuous, which may be disposed of as such. In this view of the matter, the instant writ petition is disposed of, as having become infructuous, as prayed for. May 03, 2011 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) naresh.k Judge