(Bl (^' C-..(f-[OC^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G. WRIT PETITION N0. SG £2-/2004 PETITIONER •^^ Puni ]-a-l; Chauhan, aged about 36 years, son of Shri Nanku Ram Chauhan, Asmrved Corapounder, Government Ayurvedik Aushdhalay, Jatri, Tah. & ^ .^-•"'''Q^fi'®^T Distt. Raigarh (CG) ^.v?-':^^'c>-^"- ^f •••".W'>^^•.Gl'\" '^'- '^ Q.<-A'' Y^ RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. 2. 3. The State of Chhattisgarh, through, the Secretaiy, Department of Health, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. The Director, Bharatiya Chikitsa Padhati Evam Homeopathy, Behind D.K.S. Raipur (C.G.) District Ayurvedik Adhikari, Near Shriram Colony, Beladula Road, Raigarh (C.G.) ^l.^^ WRIT PETITION _UNDER ARTICLES_ 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CEREQRARI, MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPRQPRIATE ORDER / ORDERS, DIRECTION / DIRECTIONS. 01) PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: As per the cause title. 02) PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS: As per the cause title. -p7 'S^ "-qpn^PT, ®fl1<4'IS',fslc'll'M^ V-P.^io- 'S062-/2.^)^h FB'sa^lRi- -FS/35[ counse Shri G.K.Beriwal. Shri Dashrath Gupta, Heard on the question oj The petitioner has raise^ 226,'227 of India that manv department but the case of sl for the petitioner. Gtivemment Advocate for the State. his grievances by this petition under Article juniors to him have been promoted by the le petitioner has not been coasidered for <h Leamed counsel for th^ is a gradation list which shows) the petitioner. Relying on the'j petitioner has not been promot Copies ofrepresentations have^ eounsel for the petitioner pray<| fresh representation before the| petitioner talces me to ^nexiu'e P-5 which Ithe names ofsome persons who arejuniorto date ofjoining, counse! submits that those persons who are junior to t|ie petitioner have been promoted but ;d so far. He also submits that the petitioner had fiied several representati^ns but no action has been taken on them. not been filed on record. However, leamed that the petitioner may be permitted to file a competent authorities ofthe respondents and theybe directedto decide the s^me withinthe stipulated period. The prayer made by le^med counsel for the petitioner appears to be reasonable. Having considered the jfacts aiid circumstances of the case, in the ends of justice, the petitioaer) is directed to file a detailed representation afresh along with copy ofthi^ petition and the order passed by fhis Court —12/2000—50,000. -1-: ^^^^^¥^^a%^ 7=r "4l^ici4i, ®fl1y4i<o,fs<<'fiyy,< ^^..^.:./):..^.^^2^h 31I^?T TR^f ('icl(^«l'l^) <^l<ll?l41*l ^ffi^f ^f fs^l ^^.K ^sffaHsn^r ^u- trt before the competent authoritie; days and the authorities will deQ within a period oftliree months j, ofthe respondents within a period of 15 jide the same as early as possible preferably jTrom the date offiling ofthe representation. A libert^' is also granted to th^ petitioner to raise his grievances, if the petitioner will not be satisfie^ authorities ia this regard. by the order passed by the respondent With the aforesaid obser^-atiohs the petition stands finally disposed of. Consequently, I.A.No. ^550/2004 for .urgent hearing also stands disposed of. Certified copy as per mlejs. Sd/- SunilKumarSinha Judge G;,BRJ—FS/350—12/2000—50,000.