:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1196 OF 2004. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1196 OF 2004. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1196 OF 2004. The State of Maharashtra. ..Appellant. Versus. Kallu Parsuram Pal. ..Respondent. ---- Mr.D.S.Mhaispurkar,APP for the State. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 8, 2004. DATE : DECEMBER 8, 2004. DATE : DECEMBER 8, 2004. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Mr.D.S.Mhaispurkar, the learned APP for the State. It is revealed that the prosecutrix had stayed with the accused for two days where she had an opportunity to make complaint or run away from the clutches of the accused. The Sessions Judge has rightly acquitted the accused. The view expressed by the Sessions Judge is possible view on the basis of the material produced before the Court. No interference is called for. Leave to appeal is therefore, rejected. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (S.B.MHASE,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (S.B.MHASE,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (S.B.MHASE,J.) Login:ast/sbm.