m ^ 3 ^ ^ IN THE HIGH CQURTOFCHHAmSGARH^TBILASPUR (CG) WRJT PETITION N0. J.66^ /2005 G< . <?•". PETITIONER ^ r .•• ':>ISP ...-^•y' ^•>'''/--> '% ^ S.N. Chauhan, son of Shri A.R. Chauhan, aged about 39 years, occupation - Cashier Cum Clerk in Raigarh Kshetn'ya Gramin Bank, Raigarh, Resident of Mitumuda, Distt. Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS General Manager / Chairman of Raigarh Kshetriya Gramin Bank, Station Road, Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) Branch AAanager, Raigarh Kshetnya Gramin Bank, Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, RE^PONDENTS ^ 2. i-i XI-HC-22 3TI^ST^T f^Tt^^TT^T 5hH[<=b^f?cT 3^T "4i<4i<<i't<, «iTf1'y<i<s, fci<ni^^< .^.ss^.^65 ^i^di s^^i^b 21 f^s' 3:n^T^<rTW:^rf?cT 27-4-2005 Heard Shri P. P. Sohu, . The petitioner has 226/227 of +h& Constitution |of 1-2005 passed by respondenj tr^an^ferred from Bun9a, Rd9< Jhe case of the pe111 Raigarh Kshetriya Qramm Bai|il Th^ petitioner wa^ tran^f@rr^ Jashpur two and haif year^ order, The petitioner made ^ but respondsnt No.l has not Learned counsei forl petitionsr may be ailowed to No.l and respondent No.l| accordance with law. Having heard karned regard to 1+ie facts and alJowed to make a detaiied wittiin Q period of 10 days decide the representation o| ma'iih^—FTCTH—rhedate of' chl^I^1^T1 ^I^^T^te^^f^l^K -^3Tf^q'3TT^T <|ounsel for The petitioner. p^ferred this writ petition under Article Indh chaikn9in9 the ord^r dated 25- ienlf No.l whereby the petitioner has been rh to A^ahadeo-dcxnd. l|ioner i^ that he i^ an employee of the ^k and he is serving since iast 17 years, id from thc interior* area of the DJ^trict before passing the impugned transfer repre^entation before re^pondnent No.l <|ecided ths r-epr^sentation so far. the petitioner submitted that The }^ak©G representation before respondent be directed to decide 1lhe same in coyn^el for the petitoner and having of th®case, The petitioner is repre^entation before re^pondent No.l today and m tum respondent No.l wili the petitioner within a penod of two cirdLimstances fr<t>m rocsipt df Thd r^p^^srt^ ter XI-HC-22 3TT^T^)T fN^^n^r $h^ich^rf?^T Barve Hwon^wra-) :S^ "4l^Krt4, s$Tn'MI|(S, fc(diy^< ^..w^^\.^\^°s- 22 ^l ^<-<1J^< ^T^cT ^ -^' con^iderjna ail +^ points ra| manner in accor'dance with iQv^. rslievsd, sf hs |lfl&already not WI1+1 the direction afor4said Consequently, M.(W.)P. | also stand dlsposed of, Parties areentitled for chi^?oi41Ti HiH<nT^:f^<ft'^R:?p: ^3Tf^R'3TT^T sed by th@ petitioner in esn obje&tiye }. Tiii then, 1+ie petitioner shouid not be |^{ieved. ^aid, the petition stand^ dispos^d of, N0.1Z44/2005 and I.A. No.3090/2009 ^ertjfied copy of this order. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge