IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH JULY 2008 / 8TH SRAVANA 1930 RP.No. 806 of 2008(I) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.10587/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/ RESPONDENTS ------------------------------------------------- 1. C.JOSY, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O. LATE MICHAEL XAVIER, CHALLITHARA (H) CHANDIROOR P.O., CHANDIROOR. 2. REJEENA XAVIER, W/O. LATE MICHAEL XAVIER,PALLITHARA CHANDIROOR P.O.AROOR VILLAGE, CHERTHALA TALUK. 3. ELIZABETH , D/O. LATE MICHAEL XAVIER,PALLITHARA CHANDIROOR P.O.AROOR VILLAGE, CHERTHALA TALUK. 4. MARY, D/O. LATE MICHAEL XAVIER,PALLITHARA CHANDIROOR P.O.AROOR VILLAGE, CHERTHALA TALUK. 5. KOCHUTHRESSIA, D/O. LATE MICHAEL XAVIER,PALLITHARA CHANDIROOR P.O.AROOR VILLAGE, CHERTHALA TALUK. BY ADV. SMT.C.G.BINDU SMT.C.G.AJITHA SMT.D.SARITHA SMT.M.K.RAJITHA RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER: --------------------------------- THRESSIAMMA MATHEW, AGED 65 YEARS W/O.LATE AUGUSTINE MATHEW, HAVING THE PERMANENT ADDRESS: ALUNKAVELI, AROOR P.O. CHERTHALA AND RECENTLY CHANGED THE ADDRESS ALINKAVELIYIL, CHANDIROOR P.O.,CHANDIROOR BY VARGHESE KURIAKOSE. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N. KRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.P. 806 OF 2008 IN W.P.C. NO. 10587 OF 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 30th day of July, 2008. O R D E R This review petition is filed to review the order of this Court whereby it directed the Appellate Authority, Alappuzha to dispose of A.A.1/08. The grievance is that the age shown as 76 years is incorrect whereas she will be about 65 or 70 and further that she had transferred her right in favour of other persons. I find no ground to interfere with the order passed by me and what has been directed by me is to dispose of the case which is pending in a system for more than 25 years. So even irrespective of the age it is matter which requires urgent consideration at the hands of the Appellate Authority. Therefore I find no reason to review my order and it is dismissed. I make it clear that on the merits of the case this Court has not expressed any opinion and it is for the party to have it raised before the concerned authority. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/-