1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3805 OF 2006 Sameer @ Gohar @ Raja Jamil Sayyed .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr.Jude Fernandes i/b. Mrs.Parvez Ubharye for applicant Ms.M.M.Deshmukh, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 18th October 2006. P.C. . The applicant could not avail of the 2 benefit of the order of learned Metropolitan Magistrate enlarging him on bail because he was unable to furnish surety bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/-. 2. Applicant submits that he has been in custody since 2nd June 2006 and being working as a Jari worker, was unemployed. There is none in the family or acquaintence who could furnish surety in the said sum. In such circumstances and considering the age of the applicant, the amount is reduced to Rs.10,000/-. The other conditions of the order releasing the applicant on bail, remain the same/unaltered. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)