IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20461 of 2010 SUMANT KUMAR SON OF LATE CHANARIK RAM, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ALHANPURA, P.S. BIHTA, DISTRICT PATNA. --- PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR—OPP. PARTY. ----------- For petitioner: Mr. Jay Kumar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Manish Kumar No.2, A.P.P. --- 2/ 17.06.2010 Heard the parties. In a criminal prosecution for offence under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. as an accused. It is submitted that there has been no recovery of any incriminating article either from the house or from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has not been put on T.I.Parade till date, though he is in judicial custody since 20.07.2009. It is further highlighted that co-accused Lalan Yadav, with similar allegations, has already been granted bail by a Bench of this Court by order dated 27.05.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 18406 of 2010 . In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J. XIth Patna in S.T. No. 325 of 2010, arising out of Beur P.S. Case No. 97 of 2008,subject to 2 conditions that: (A) one of the bailors must be government servant or close family member of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit in the court below showing his/her relationship with the petitioner, (B) if the petitioner is found involved in same and similar nature of cases in future, then in that case the informant/ prosecution shall be at liberty to file a petition for cancellation of bail of the petitioner, and if such a petition is filed, the court below would be obliged to dispose of the same in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned . ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J ) BTiwary/