IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 5507 of 1995 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORP. Versus A'BAD MUNICIPAL TRANSPORT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 5507 of 1995 MR SN SHELAT for Petitioner No. 1 MR MG NAGARKAR for Petitioner No. 2 MR MB GANDHI for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD Date of decision: 20/02/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT Heard learned advocate Mr. M.G. Nagarkar for the petitioner and Mr. M.B.Gandhi for the respondents. In this petition, the petitioner has challenged the award made by the Industrial Tribunal in Reference (IT) No. 448 of 1977 dated 12th January, 1995. During the pendency of this petition, there was a negotiation between the parties and ultimately, proposal which was submitted by the respondent has been accepted by the General Board of the Corporation on 30.9.1997 accepting the resolution passed by the Transport Committee bearing No. 273 dated 30.6.1997. In view of the said resolution of the Transport Committee, subsequently, approval was given by the General Board of the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation, the Transport Manager has issued Circular bearing No. 44 dated 15.10.1997. In view of that order, the matter is settled between the parties. Therefore, this petition is required to be disposed of as having been settled between the parties. Accordingly this petition is disposed of. Rule is discharged. Interim relief, if any, shall stand vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. (H.K. Rathod,J.) Vyas