IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.W.P.No.1928 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:October 29, 2010 Daya Singh .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.R.K.Bagga, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 3(1)(c) of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988, is for issuance of directions to the respondents to accept application of the petitioner for agricultural parole and decide the same. Heard. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner approached respondent no.3, i.e., Superintendent, District Jail, Karnal, with an application for granting him agricultural parole in third week of September, and however, he refused to accept the same. Hence, in view of these facts and as per request, the present petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.3 to entertain the application filed by the petitioner in this regard and thereafter respondents are directed to consider and decide the same as per law, Rules and Instructions on the point, within one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 29.10.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge