WP(C) 6573/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA Heard Mr. H. Das, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K .N. Choudhury, learned Senior Advocate and Standing Counsel, Indian Oil Corporat ion. The grievance of the petitioner is that he has been operating the S.K. Oil godow n since 10.05.1977 by virtue of Annexure-1 to the writ petition. For bona fide n ecessity the petitioner is required to shift the said godown from Narengi to Noo nmati. For that purpose he has made a representation to the Sr. Divisional Retai l Sales Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. on 16.03.2011, as available at Anne xure-3 to the writ petition. Since no action was forthcoming, he again submitted a reminder representation on 30.09.2011 (Annexure-5 to the writ petition), pray ing for giving him permission to shift the said kerosene godown from Narengi to Noonmati but no action whatsoever has been yet taken by the respondents. This Court is of the opinion that, ends of justice would meet if the writ petiti on is disposed of with the direction as follows. Accordingly, the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are directed to consider the representa tion of the petitioner, dated 16.03.2011 ( Annexure-3 to the writ petition) and the subsequent representation dated 30.09.2011 (Annexure-5 to the writ petition) , within a period of 6(six) weeks from today. As a matter of abundant caution, the petitioner shall furnish the certified copy of this order to the respondent Nos. 2 and 3, as expeditiously as possible. In addition thereto, a copy of this order be furnished to Mr. N. Baruah, learned Ad vocate for the respondent-Indian Oil Corporation, by the Registry for doing the needful. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs.