J IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Pei-f }-io-y-l, Contempt Gs&e. No. /07 J!iala"®@si^> "*£ss:~~' ".^^il'Sfe (Arising out of order dated 29.06.2007 passed in WP No. 3063/2006 by Hon'ble Justice Shri QasS6^Scie^ef^ 1- •C- a cLe. CA^ Complainant -•(Petitioner) jjethuram Dhruv aged about 65 years, S/o Late Kansu Ram Dhruv Ex. Assistant Teacher (Science) Govt. Higher Secondary School d "^- -1).»-- (-Jovt ftt^ ' Village Jarve, Block Development Palari d--; ^.^ *'stt:' ^^ '•-"•''' Tahsil Palari, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS Contemners Smt. R. Bamra, District Education Officer, Raipur (C.G.) CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Ihe-c^a -"""~~ S OOB7T993 B^^%^ VAKALATNAMA £NTHE HTOH mTTDTm-'^7^^—~=—— sn^r^n ;.^M ^"v^t Despti -Tc? ••:qPlRTq, '^frffTS. f'lcll'My 3H^?T XRT^ -1A< ,^^/oT *111CTIW41^ fcKi'citr' •^ roo an^i^nw^ift^ SB: Honible Shrj Manindra Mphdn Shrivastava,J. 24-01-2011 Shri v.G.Tamaskar, counsell Shri Paiiav Mishra, counsel ft By this contempt petition, th|s dated 29/6/06 passed by this Court| From the order dated respondentfcontemnor, 1 find tha( representation has been decided bil' extent, the grievance has also beer| feels aggrieved against the decisi^ open for him to take recourse to the| do not find that the responcf' contempt. Therefore, the rule is di off. <<>i'')I<'i41-f tira^f 4 felzt <F«<;i< iisipOTsn^i for the petitioner. >r the respondent. th|e petitioner has aiieged violation of order |in W.P.No.3063/06. 26|f10/06 (Annexure R/1) passed by the the claim of the petitioner under his the authority. By the said order, to some redressed. However, if the petitioner stil! ^n taken by the respondent, it wouid be I remedy, availabie under the taw. jent, by passing such an order, committed i^charged. The petition is finaily disposed Sd/- Manindra MohanShrivastava Judge [xfti? tfe^!