d) t^^l BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRITPETITIONfONO. '^T.S'C / 2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS • £,'^^ ^y> ^ '-•^ y ... ', -'y ...•":^' n^" . yio Mahabir Prasad, S/o. Shri Satyanarayan, Aged about 60 »A- years, R/o. Patthalgoan^Lailunga, District, Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2.Nagar Panchayat, Lailunga, District - Raigarh, (C.G.) 3. Collector, Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA I- +- ir a'^w^iif^w WtaTI^IsiWN; M DgRpit *«i<nia»*<iq» '3~ST '<iwwii, »fll'y'|ic, f<<diyli<. •..©..-?..:.'f5..^l 200 sn^i Tra?:r ('<pf3^ti) 5«ii<a<-wfcfl an^ SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Moh 02-12-2011 Shri Saurabh Dangi and MsJ Shri V.V.S.Murthy, Deputy Government Advocate for the StaN. Learned counsei for the part|es identical cases arising from ttie issued by Nagar Panchayat, Lailunba, Not disputed. Accordingly, this writ petiti|on However, the Nagar Panchayat w( opportunity of hearing to the pers^n decide the question of authorizec) dispute, before passing the orde) concerned. <)ii<i(<n<H*i ii^CTl^f fs^ <Rt<'$i< <1? sifa'i an^i n Shrivastava. J. Bulbut ^rawal, counsel forthe petitioner. Advocate General aiong With Shri Arun Sao, submit that an order has been passed in the >ame area and on account of similar notices i, Raigarh. is also disposed off on the same terms. ill not take any action without affording proper concemed. The Nagar Panchayat may also or unauthorized structure, as the same is in , after considering the cases of the persons «.^»s? CTl'ftT $°teg?ITCRT, -FS/140—2/2011—1-1.50,000. 4-