IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT: THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.12219 of 2009 Between: B. Kumar Reddy, S/o. Late B.H.V. Ramana Rao @ Ramana Reddy, R/o. H.No. 6-1-535/11 (25/2RT), LIGH, Khairatabad, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of A.P., Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintendent of Police, Ranga Reddy District, Cyberabad. 3 The Station House Officer, Rajendra Nagar Police Station, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District. 4 Mr. Faisal Bin Abbullah, S/o. Abdulla Bin Salam, R/o. H.No. 7-12, Narsingi Village, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 5 Smt. R. Sudha Rani, W/o. Raghava Reddy, R/o. H.No. 1-8-248, Balasamudram, Hanamkonda, Warangal District. ..... RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. J.U.M.V.PRASAD Counsel for Respondents 1 to 3 : AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the inaction of the Station House Officer, Rajendra Nagar Police Station, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District, in completing investigation and filing charge sheet in F.I.R.No.237 of 2008, dated 08.09.2008 before the jurisdictional Magistrate against respondent Nos.4 and 5, as illegal and arbitrary. At the hearing, Sri J.U.M.V.Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he has wrongly impleaded Rajendra Nagar Police Station in the cause title instead of Narsingi Police Station. However, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submitted that the criminal case registered on the private complaint filed by the petitioner was investigated into and a final report was filed before the VIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Rajendra Nagar, Cyberabad, reporting that the case lacked evidence. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that his client has no information about the said report. Inasmuch as the final report is stated to have been filed by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Narsingi Police Station, liberty is given to the petitioner to file a protest petition before the jurisdictional Magistrate. If the petitioner has not received a copy of the final report, respondent No.3 shall supply a copy of the same to the petitioner immediately on his approaching him. Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP.No.15772 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. _________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 30th June, 2009. Kl/kvni