c t€ \' VJ Q”! maw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.No. 44$” 2005 r Petitioner ............... Dharamdayal aged 47 years " Son of Chainuram // Patwari P.C.N0.30. Tahsil and district Durg. Versus Respondents .............. 1. The State Government of Chhattishgarh, /’ Through the Secretary, Revenue, Department, D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The District Collector, Durg (C.G.) f, 3. Tahsildar, Durg. // f / 4. Shri Shesh Narain Patel, patwari P.C.No. 18 Tahsil Gunderdehi, ’ 9V District Durg. iev \9/l 2‘“ Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. ww n‘ \ K XI~HC~22 Wm 1 7-1 -2006 Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advc Gate, for the petitioher. Shri Sahdeep Dubey, Govt. Advqcate with Shri Vivek Sharma, ‘ Panel lawyer for the State. > I ’ V Shri T.K. Tiwari,_Adv. for re:5po,nde'nts No. 4. : Heard. r Learned coUnsel for the petitioner states that he wants to withdraw the petitiori with liberty to make a representation before the competent authority of the respondents. 3y the counsel for other side. The prayer is not opposed The petition ie accordingly disposed of with liberty to theepetitloner to make a detailed representaton raising his grievances before the competent authority of the respondents along with a copy of the'petition and this order within two weeks from today, and .on such representation being tiled, the competent autho from the date of receipt of the 'ity of the respondents shalt decide the _ same on its own merits in accordance with iaw as early as possible preferably within two months representation. With the aforesaid observations, this petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules Pathakl— Sdl— Fakhruddin Judge f [View ‘ wykmqk‘gg “Q6 65h mm W1 zoo L ... ' ma mmmW. mm? wa‘f if fgiér twat $Wm