1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ORDER PREM PRAKASH JOSHI V. THE STATE & ANOTHER. S. B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO.1509/2008 under Section 482, Cr. P.C., against the Order dated 23-10-1998, passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division) & Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Balotra in Regular Criminal Case No.34/98. DATE OF ORDER: DECEMBER 3, 2008. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. M. TOTLA Mrs. Teena Arora for Petitioner (s). Mr. O.P.Rathi, PP, for State-Respondent No.1. BY THE COURT: Learned Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of the State of Rajasthan. Petitioner requests quashing qua him of proceedings in Criminal Regular Case No.340/98 before the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Balotra in relation to FIR No.295/97 Police Station, Balotra for the offences under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B, IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that in similar 7-8 other cases, vide order dated 22.09.2008, directions are for surrender and bail of petitioner and this case is exactly similar to those cases. Necessary alleged facts & developments. As per copies are that R2 and others on 29.07.1997, submitted a complaint before ACJM against eight persons including company alleging that of company Guru Shikhar Saving & Finance India Ltd., these persons opened a Branch and 2 inducingly procured montly recurring deposits of Rs. 50 to 1100 as Fixed Deposits assuring payment with interest, but no payment made, despite completed five years – now the persons are not available and payments not made. Complaint forwarded under Section 156 (3), Cr.P.C., and on registered FIR, charge-sheet is submitted. Learned Public Prosecutor stated that order similar as passed in other petitions may be appropriate. Considered. Case does seem to be in similar to those for which petitioner's S. B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.1054/2008 and six other petitions decided vide order dated 22.09.2008. For the reasons and conclusions arrived at in the earlier orders and taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to direct the petitioner present himself before the trial Court on or before 18th December, 2008. If the petitioner so surrenders and moved bail application before the trial Court, the trial Court shall release the petitioner on bail on the terms and conditions which trial Court deems fit. In case the petitioner fails to put in appearance on or before 18th December, 2008, this order shall stand vacated. With these observations, this misc. petition is disposed of. petitioner will be at liberty to raise all the questions before the trial Court at the time of framing of charge. (C. M. TOTLA), J. scd