1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35297 of 2010 BABLOO RAY S/O DHINO RAY --PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --OPP.PARTY 4 07.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, who is armed with the carbon copy of the case diary. Petitioner is named accused in this case but on some suspicion of administering poisonous substance to his wife, that is, daughter of the informant, who, as appears, has filed a petition for compromise before the court below. On going through the case diary learned additional Public Prosecutor could not point out anything specific against the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of case, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in Nauhatta P.S. Case no. 45 of 2010, subject to the condition that one of the bailoers must be father-in-law of the petitioner, who is informant of the case with 2 additional condition that the petitioner shall remain present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case. If the petitioner fails to remain present on three consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. AAhmad (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)