c^ IN THE HON^BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BiLASPUR WRIT PETITIONmNo. .>"S&£ of 2010 Petitioners °^\ ^c ./• •<^.,A"','\?'\5 ^i^ ..Sy^ t^ '7.(^ ^" ^^ s ^ Respondents (1)' M/s Vadera Enterprises a Partnership Firm having its office at Near Subhash Primary School, Vitthal Nagar, Gondia, Maharashtra through its partner & authorized signatory Ajay Vadera, S/o Jamnadas Vadera, aged about 46 years, resident of Vitthal Nagar, Gondia, Distt. Bhandara Maharshtra 441601 Versys <_ (1) State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary Department of Commercial Tax, D.K.S. Mantralaya Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) (2) ^ Chhattisgarh State Minor Forest Produce (T&D) Cooperative Federation Limited, A-25 V.I.P. Estate Near V.I.P. Club Khamardih Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) ^through Managing Director. (3) Managing Director District Minor Forest Produce Cooperative Union Ltd. & Conservator of Forest, Kanker (C.G.). .(^ (4) Commissioner Commercial Tax Vanijyik Kar Bhavan, Civil Lines, Raipur (C.G.) I. Before: Hon'ble the Chief Justice and his companion iudaes of the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur. ' HIGI-1 CO U RT :OF, C H HATTISGARH ; Bl LMPBR ^ ^ WRIT PETlTIQN (T)' N0. 5585 OF 2010 ' ^ \ PETITIONER M/s. Vadera Enterprises ^ : %.; -•Versus:''-' :- .;: ':: •• ' '•• •:y:;':::': RESRONDENTS , • State 6f Ghhattisgarh&Othei-s' ^ -: ' (VWFitRetitiori^uriclerArticle2266ftl-ieGonstitutiQnoflndia) .: ^; .Single Beneh : HQn'ble Shi-i Satish K.Agnihotri, J^ Preserit:- Shri Neelabh Dubey, Advocateforthe petitianer. ShriM.P.S.Bhafia,Dy. Govt.Advocate fortheState. ORC)ER(ORAL) (Passedorrthis 19thday6fQGtobe^ 1. The questibn arising from the facts asto whether the pyrchase of tendu leaves by.the petitipner, who is registered as exporter, ; Cpmes within •thg purview^of the-inter-state sale or iritra-state -sale.'. '1 ',. . ' •. .:'• ' • i r 1 :: ' - 2. The ' aforesaid question already carne up ; for consideration before this ©ourt.in/Wa, S/iyamfi/ri Werks LfCS. v. The State af Gttl'iaftisgarh & Othees^ and other eonnected rnatters and^he same has been decided hplding that the sale is ''•"intFa-statesale";: .,.. •:. :-i,. ••;•.,: •.;:.:' "''•: • •.: /'::' ^ 3. In view pf the.decjSion ot tHis Court ih /t^s. Sftyam BWT WbrifS Lfct (supra), thispetitipn is di&missed. __. — Sd/- ;,, SatishK.Agiuhoti Judge 1W.P. Mo.2060of 2002 (decidedon 1-10-2010)