CWP No. 1931 of 2008 19.5.2010 Present:- Mr. Dushyant Dadwal, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. P.K.Sharma, Addl. A.G. with Mrs. Shubh Mahajan, Dy. Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 4. 1. The petitioner has prayed for quashing of recommendation made by respondent No.3 vide order dated 22.9.2008 Annexure P-11. It has also been prayed that respondents may be restrained from terminating the services of the petitioner on the post of Lecturer in Commerce at Govt. Senior Secondary School, Kaulanwala Bhood, Distt Sirmour under PTA where he is working since 2007. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that grievance raised by the petitioner is covered by the Division Bench judgment in CWP No. 1289 of 2010 decided on 9.4.2010 in which the Division Bench has passed the following order:- “ The issue raised in this writ petition pertains to the selection and appointment of teachers by the Parents Teacher Association. The learned counsel appearing on both sides point that the Director, Higher Education, Himachal Pradesh has issued a communication dated 24th September, 2009 and the case requires fresh consideration in the light of the said communication. The relevant portion of the communication of the Director, Higher Education, Himachal Pradesh reads as follows:- Refer to letter No. EDN-Kha(7)3706-1 dated 3.9.2009 from the Principal Secretary (Education) to the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh to this directorate and copy endorsed to you and others vide which the Government has asked to move an application immediate before the Chairman of the concerned enquiry committee in view of the decision of CWP No. 525/2009 titled as Ravinder Singh vs. State and CWP No. 2632/2009 titled as Koyal Kumar Vs. State wherein the Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh while setting aside the orders of the committee has directed that Committee after giving adequate opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the other respondents can look into the matter and decide whether the appointment of the petitioner was valid or not. The committee while deciding the issue will keep into consideration the observation of the Hon’ble High Court made in CWPs. The copy of the judgement/orders passed by the Hon’ble High Court in CWP No. 2632/2009 titled as Koyal Kumar Vs. State is also being sent to all the Deputy Directors. Therefore, you are directed to comply with the directions of the Government and take action in the matter accordingly.” In view of the above clarification issued by the Director of Higher Education, Himachal Pradesh, the impugned orders are liable to be set aside. Ordered accordingly. However, we make it clear that it will be open to the Enquiry Committee to consider the matters afresh in the light of the instruction referred to above. The needful, if required, shall be done within a period of four months from the date of the production of a copy of this judgment by either side. It is also made clear that in the cases of those teachers who are working in the schools, in case they have not been paid their due wages, the same shall be paid and the State shall ensure that the required grant-in-aid is given to the Schools, as per the Rules forthwith.” 2. The learned Addl. Advocate General has also submitted that grievance raised by the petitioner in the present petition is covered by the judgment dated 9.4.2010 referred above. In these circumstances, the petition is allowed on the terms indicated above in judgment dated 9.4.2010 in CWP No. 1289 of 2010. The petition stands disposed of. CMPs No. 2756/2008, 5352/09,4986/09 3. Infructuous in view of disposal of the main petition. Copy Dasti on usual terms. May 19, 2010. ( Kuldip Singh ) (sks) Judge.