CF ^00/. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION [S] NO.^<f77....0F 2010 1@»- PETITIONERS /^ My ^/\y^y C^/{J^/ cv ^/H. / (^ H-C.- </ 1. /Harish Chandra Adil/,. S/o Late Shri Bishal Singh Adil, aged about 49 years, worklng as Sub Engineer (B.E. Holder) In-charge as Assistant Engineer (Pradhamantri Graru Sadak Yojna) Panchayat 8s Rural Development Department, Raipur [C.G.] 2. Rakesh Kumar Shau, son of Late shri Ganguram Sahu, aged about 48 years, working as Sub Engineer (B.E. Holder) In-charge as Assistant Engineer (Pradhamantri Grara Sadak Yojna) Panchayat & Rural Development Department, Durg [C.G.] 3. Virendra Kumar Bhargava, S/o Late Shri S.C.Bhargava, aged about 48 years, working as Sub Engineer (B.E. Holder) In-charge as Assistant Engineer (Pradhainantri Grain Sadak Yojna) Panchayat 8s Rural Development Department, Raipur [C.G.] • /4. Prem Kumar Sharma, S/o Late Shri G.L. Sharma, aged about 48, working as Sub-Engineer (B.E. Holder) (Pradhamantri Gram Sadak Yojna) Panchyat & Rural Development Department, Bilaspur [C.G.] "/ ® VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^l /2, ••i State of Chhattisgarh through Development Commissioner Panchayat and Gramin Vikash Vibhag, Vikash Bhawan, Civil Line, Raipur [C.G.] The Additional Secretary Panchyat & Rural Development Departraent D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) The Deputy Commissioner Development Commissioner Office Panchayat and Grainin Vikash Vibhag, Vikash Bhawan, Civil Line, Raipur [C.G.] WRITPETITLON _UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA. ,3. ,|I. ;-ii 1 ii::£!ii.iiitNHt>i^ih »fNg'B! HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR WRTT PETmON f8) No. 412 of2010 PETmONERS : H.C.Adil (Harish Chandra Adil) & others. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofCMattisgarh & Others. WMT PETIT10N UNDER ARIICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmmON OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shrf Satish K. Aemlwtri. J. Present: Shri R-S.Patel, Advocate for Ifae petitioners. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Govenauenit Advocate forthe State. ORALORDER (Passed on 29tt day of January, 2010) 1. Leamed coimsel appearing for the petitionens, on instructions, seeks permission of this court to withdraw this petition with liberiy to make a representation to the respondent-authorities and in tum, iftfae representation is made, tiie respondent authorities may eonsider the same in accordance with law, on its own merits. 2. It is ordered as prayed for. 3. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissai as withdrawn with the aforestated liberty, ifso advised. ___-——— Sd/- S^TISHK. AGNIHOTRI Judge Amit