IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 388 of 1988 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- KALAVATIBEN V PARMAR Versus DIRECTOR -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR HR SINGH for MR KB PUJARA for Petitioner MR PREMAL R JOSHI for M/S PATEL ADVOCATES for Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE Date of decision: 28/09/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. The petitioner expired during the pendency of the special civil application. The civil application has been filed for bringing on record her heirs and legal representatives on which separate order has been passed. The petitioner prayed for following reliefs in this special civil application: (a) to issue a writ of mandamus or in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents not to terminate the petitioner's services and to continue her in their service with all consequential benefits; (b) to direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner as a regular peon or sweeper instead of the temporary appointment given to her as at present, and to give her all the consequential benefits of a permanent regular employment under the respondents; (c) pending the admission, hearing and final disposal of this petition be pleased to restrain the respondents, their agents and servants from terminating the petitioner's services and be further pleased to direct them to continue the petitioner in their service as at present; 2. The petitioner had been protected by this Court so she continued in service but unfortunately she died during the pendency of this special civil application. In fact her services were not brought to an end by the respondents, and after her death, now nothing survives in this petition and the same is dismissed. Rule discharged. Interim relief, if any, granted stands vacated. No order as to costs. ********** zgs/-