CD mTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S3TI- ..•••^ ^.y WRIT PETITION No. }/10 72006 ^{^ ^ PETITIONER ,.-;j^ Lalman, S/o. Bansi Ram, Aged about 57 years, R/o. Sahid Veer Narayan Singh Nagar, Tulsipar, Bhilai, Distt. Dm-g (C.G.) ^'c^--"' ^'K-' ^vn^'' .. c^.--Ot\L:7' ...-•" ^•>y .^y t'*'^^}/"' RESPONDENTS VERSUS State Traasport Appellate Tribunal Rsupur (C.G.) Regional Transport Authority, Raipur (C.G.), Through Secretary. Shitla Prasad Pandey, S/o. Premlal Pandey, House No.780 Sindya Nagar, Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA [ r XI-HC-22 sn^f^i K-U* 3V^V .^•RN) 'Hf^T ^ )(^; T ^ .Sr^ '3^T "i||'l<lci4, tSTfl'y'ls, l°i<']iyi< wqnrw^rai.iri.;B.<oo.:U^°. "W^ 290 (, SII^T ^grgir ^rfs^r Shri B.K. Rawat, coun Shri. • Yashwant Sing respondents no. 2 on advanc HearH on admission. Ttiis petition has t: 10.2.2006 passed in Reyis perusal of tiie impugned c OfEcer of fhe STAT, in appUcation for interim stay s on 2.1,2.2006. Leanied counsel for niatter has been adjoumed t I do not iind aiiy reas^ oider passed by (Eie Tribuna-| This writ petition has \ <tiwic)<B-f 'w^t ^ ft'zt I^R^IT . ^ariigii aii^i pel for flie petitioner. |i, Go\rt. Advocate for the State/ •e.copy. , een ffled against fhe order dated ion No.18,/2006 (Annexure P-4). A 'rder would show tlia.t fhe Pi^siding 1 bi-pafty hearing has sllowed an uid has fixed the case forfm.al hearing the petitioner subniits that now the o 091:hofMarch 2006. n to interfere wifh tlie bi-party interim 10 laerit and the same is ctismissed. Sdf- Sunil KumarSinha Judge [Tft^^f^