HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2592 of 2009 ORDER: This revision is preferred against the order of the District Judge, Srikakulam in Co.O.P. No.346of 2007 dated 31.03.2009. The petitioner herein is also the petitioner in Co.O.P. No.346 of 2007. He filed the petition before the Tribunal seeking the following relief: “to declare that Appeal Suit pending before the Senior Civil Judge, Sompeta against the decree and Judgment of O.S. No.17 of 2000 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Tekkali is barred by jurisdiction, void and ineffective and to order the 3rd respondent to appoint a Special Officer to organize the institution by conducting general body meeting or appoint an Advocate Commissioner to conduct General body meeting and election of President and managing body to activate the institution to provide employment to the artisans and employees.” The learned District Judge, by his order dated 31.03.2009, dealt with the first limb of the prayer which is to declare the appeal suit pending before the Senior Civil Judge, against the decree and judgment in O.S. No.17 of 2000, as barred by jurisdiction. He held that these matters could not be examined in the O.P. filed before him. However, the second limb of the prayer which is to appoint a Special Officer to organize the institution by conducting a General body meeting or appoint an Advocate Commissioner to conduct a General body meeting and election of the President and the managing body to activate the institution to provide employment to the artisans and employees, has not been dealt with by the learned District Judge. The petitioner herein has now filed an affidavit dated 19.08.2010 wherein he states that he was not pressing the prayer in so far as seeking a declaration that “the appeal suit pending before the Senior Civil Judge, Sompeta against the decree and judgment of O.S. No.17 of 2000, on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Tekkali, is barred by jurisdiction, void and ineffective.” In view of the affidavit now filed, the first limb of the prayer in Co.O.P. No.346 of 2007 must be held to have been deleted and, consequently, the only prayer which the Tribunal (District Judge, Srikakulam) is required to examine is for a direction to the 3rd respondent (Regional Director of Khadi & Village Industries Commission) to appoint a Special Officer to organize the institution by conducting General body meeting, or to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to conduct the General body meeting and the election of President and the managing body to activate the institution to provide employment to the artisans and employees. Sri Ch. Dhananjaya, Learned Counsel for the 1st respondent, would submit that this relief cannot also be granted by the Tribunal. It is wholly unnecessary for this Court to examine the said contention in as much as this question has not been dealt with by the Tribunal at all. It is only when the Tribunal records a finding in this regard in the first instance, would this Court be required to examine the legality of the said order in revision proceedings under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. It is not for this Court in proceedings under Article 227 of the Constitution to take upon itself the task, as an original authority would, of determining whether or not the relief sought for could have been granted. I consider it appropriate, therefore, to set aside the order of the Tribunal and remand the matter back to the Learned District Judge, Srikakulam to consider the Co.O.P. There shall be a direction accordingly. Needless to state that any order which the learned District Judge may pass shall only be after hearing both the parties. The C.R.P. is, accordingly, disposed of. _____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J 03.09.2010 MRKR