(1) CRI. APLN. 4738.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4738 OF 2010 Satish S/o Jalba Yedle, Age : 19 years, Occu.: Education, R/o. Girwalkar Nagar, Latur, Tal : Latur, Dist.: Latur Applicant VERSUS The State of Maharashtra Respondent ..... Mr. V.D. Gunale, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. P.P. More, A.P.P. for the Respondent/State. ..... CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 23RD DECEMBER, 2010 ORAL ORDER:- 1. This is an Application for bail. Heard learned Advocate for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Perusal of the investigation papers prima facie show that deceased was found dead in the morning of 17.5.2010 in the courtyard of the house. There were three injuries on his head, cheek and neck. There was pool of blood under the wooden cot where the dead body was found lying. It was (2) CRI. APLN. 4738.2010 suspected by the informant that the deceased was done to death by his wife, namely, Godabai, the applicant i.e. his son and the daughter by name Jyoti. The suspicion is founded on the ground that the deceased was in their company during the earlier night. 3. There is no eye witness account about the incident. The prosecution believed that deceased- Godabai alias Godavaribai was the main culprit because she was aggrieved due to the pervert acts of the deceased. It appears that the deceased was indulging in perversity by molesting his daughter and also used to demand sexual pleasure from the wife at any time during the day or night. It also appears from the investigation papers that the deceased was a drunkard, sex-maniac and a pervert person. The applicant is a young person and nothing is recovered from him during course of investigation except a cable wire. 4. Considering the nature of the incident and the relevant record, the applicant deserves liberty as his detention is no more required for the purpose of any investigation nor the charge appears to be (3) CRI. APLN. 4738.2010 based on any direct evidence and moreover, what happened in the relevant night is not clearly revealed. 5. In the result, the Application is allowed. The applicant is directed to be released on bail on furnishing of bail bonds in sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rs.Fifteen Thousand) with a solvent surety bond in the like sum and on condition that he will not make any attempt to tamper with the evidence of the prosecution. Sd/- [V. R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp