IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MMO. No. 104/2008. Date of Decision:18.3.2009. ______________________________________________ Bhawna Devi. ……..petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and another. ……..Respondents. Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surinder Singh, J. Whether approved for reporting1? . For the appellant : Mr. R.L.Chaudhary,Advocate. For respondent-1: Mr.J.S.Guleria, Assistant Advocate General. For respondent-2. Mr.G.R.Palsra, Advocate. Surinder Singh,J(Oral). Heard. The present petition has been filed for the cancellation of pre-arrest bail allowed to respondent No.2 by the learned Sessions Judge, for the offences under Sections 376 and 506 I.P.C. on the mentally ill prosecutrix. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner D.N.A. report, received recently from the Forensic Science Laboratory connects the respondent No.2 with the offence. A perusal of the order of bail shows that the pre- arrest bail was granted by the learned Sessions Judge till the filing of chargesheet in the court against respondent No.2 Whether reporters of the Local papers are allowed to see the judgment? . with the rider that the petitioner would seek regular bail on filing of the challan within one month from the date of receipt of notice of the challan, which means that the said bail was conditional and operative up to one month from the date of putting the challan in the court. According to the learned Assistant Advocate General the chargesheet against respondent No.2 has been filed. In view of this situation now it shall be open to the petitioner to object to the enlargement of respondent No.2 on bail, if he has applied for regular bail. However, it is directed that the court entertaining the application for bail shall hear the objection of Sh.Jai Ram Kaundal guardian of the prosecutrix or his counsel while deciding the bail. The petition stands disposed of. (Surinder Singh), Judge. March 18, 2009(R)