IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.849 of 2002. WRIT PETITION NO.849 of 2002. WRIT PETITION NO.849 of 2002. The Union of India & Others ..Petitioners versus All India Director General Quality Assurance (Group-B) Gazetted Officers Association, Pune & Others ..Respondents Shri Y.S.Bhate with Mrs. L.B.Latne for the petitioners CORAM : BILAL NAZKI & CORAM : BILAL NAZKI & CORAM : BILAL NAZKI & R.Y.GANOO, JJ. R.Y.GANOO, JJ. R.Y.GANOO, JJ. DATED : 17th April, 2009. DATED : 17th April, 2009. DATED : 17th April, 2009. P.C. 1. This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the Order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai in Original Application No.961 of 1998. This petition further challenges the Order passed by the said Tribunal in Review Petition. 2. The petitioners before the Tribunal sought many reliefs from the tribunal and ultimately confined their prayers to one of the reliefs. They sought directions from the tribunal that the respondents should decide about the nomenclature/designation of the Group B Gazetted Officers. The basic grievance of the petitioners -2- before the Tribunal was that posts were available and that they were entitled to be promoted to the post of Senior Officer, Grade II. But this posts were not filled up for long period of time i.e. from the year 1994. While the tribunal considered the rival arguments of the parties, it gave its findings at paragraph 6, page 64 and in the tribunal came to the conclusion that the petitoners were working as foreman and they were eligible for being promoted to the post of Junior Scientific Officer from the year 1994, but from 1994 no promotions had been made and therefore the tribunal worked out for promoting the officers retrospectively and notionally without even giving them monetary benefits. Therefore, Review Petition was filed on the ground that promotions could not be made retrospectively, even notionally because there was no departmental committee established between 1994 to 2000. This writ petition has also been filed on the similar grounds. We do not find that the Order of the trinubal can be interefered with on any ground. The review petition is misconceived. Hence dismissed. (Bilal Nazki, J.) (Bilal Nazki, J.) (Bilal Nazki, J.) -3- (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) (R.Y.Ganoo, J.)