IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 22ND NOVEMBER 2010 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 7465 of 2010() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.1235/2010 OF PARIPALLY POLICE STATION CMP.11393/2010 of J.M.F.C. - I, PARAVUR .................... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.3 (IN CUSTODY) -------------------------------------------------------- BABURAJAN, S/O.VASUDEVAN PILLAI, SARASWATHY MANDIRAM, KARIPALLUR, PUTHENKULAM.P.O., PARIPPALLY VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.K.RAVEENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARIPPALLY POLICE STATION. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. .................................................... Bail Application No.7465 of 2010 ..................................................... Dated: 22.11.2010 ORDER Petitioner, who is the accused in Crime No.1235 of 2010 of Parippally Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 149,323,452 and 308 IPC, seeks his enlargement on bail. The petitioner was arrested on 9.11.2010. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application contending, inter alia, that the accused persons, who are all relatives, were attacking the de facto complainant with lethal weapons like sword etc. for his having fallen in love with the daughter of the 2nd accused and four persons were injured in the occurrence. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioner, the sentiments of the near relatives of the victim and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution B.A. No.7465 of 2010 2 witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. Dated this the 22nd day of November, 2010. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) sj