IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 5435 of 2006 Between: M.V.R. Ch. Krishnaji Rao S/o. Satyam Divili, Peddapuram Mandal, E.G. District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary to Cooperative Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The District Cooperative Officer, Kakinada, E.G. District. 3 The Divisional Cooperative Officer, Peddapuram, E.G. District. 4 Pulimeru Primary Agrl. Coop. Society Ltd., Pulimeru, Peddapuram Madal, E.G. District. Rep. by its President. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in placing the petitioner under suspension beyond the period of six months as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the Special Bylaws relating to the service conditions of the Employees of the Cooperative Societies and also contrary to A.P. Shops and Establishments Act consequently set aside the suspension order dt.25-11-2003 by reinstating the petitioner into service with all incidental and consequential benefits. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.L.V.S.NAGARAJU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION No. 5435 OF 2006 O R D E R: The very writ petition is ﬁled challenging the suspension of the petitioner from service. However, now it is brought to the notice of this Court that during the pendency of the writ petition, enquiry was completed and the petitioner was dismissed from service. Therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition. It is accordingly dismissed. However, this will not preclude the petitioner from pursuing the remedies, as available to him under the law, against the dismissal order passed by the respondents. C.V. RAMULU, J. Date: 18-09-2008. MVB.