IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.1377 OF 2005 Dattu Gopala Patil ..Appellant. Vs. Shamrao Limbaji Jadhav ..Respondent. .... Mr.M.L.Patil for the Appellant. CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. J. J. 2nd December, 2005. P.C. : There is no substantial question of law raised in the Second Appeal. The First Appellate Court has noted from the sale deed (Exh.38) under which the Appellant claims, that the boundaries on the southern side are marked by a road. The property of the Defendants is after the southern boundaries of the Appellant’s holding. Moreover, the Appellant admitted in terms that both the reports of the T.I.L.R. were erroneous. The T.I.L.R. similarly admitted that he had not considered the sale deed Exh.38. In these circumstances, the Second Appeal does not raise any substantial question of law and is accordingly dismissed.