IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22650 of 2009 MD.IDRIS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 31.08.2009 Heard both sides. Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 364, 302, 201 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. The father of the informant and Boats man were kidnapped by the accused named therein. This fact was disclosed to the informant in course of search by two witnesses. Following date the dead bodies of the deceaseds (father of the informant and the boats man) were recovered. Learned counsel submits that similarly placed co-accused have been given privilege of bail. He referred to different orders enclosed as Annexures- 4 and 4a. This Court finds from the impugned order that the petitioner evaded arrest for a long time. Charge-sheet was ultimately submitted against him showing absconder. Petitioner is in custody since 2.1.2009. From the different orders passed by this Court in respect of other co-accused, it appears that they remained in custody for more than a year and thereafter the privilege of bail was 2 granted to them. Having regard to the facts appearing from the record, this Court for the present is not inclined to admit him on bail. Prayer for bail is accordingly, rejected. Considering the submission of the petitioner, that similarly placed co-accused have subsequently been granted privilege of bail by this Court. I am persuaded to grant liberty to the petitioner to renew prayer for bail after seven months, if in the meanwhile the trail of the case is not taken up. P.K. (K.K. Mandal, J.)