IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16581 of 2010 GANESH PRASAD SINGH, SON OF LATE RAMADHAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF 13/2, GHARAUNDA, ANANDPURI, P.S. SRI KRISHANA PURI, TOWN AND DISTRICT- PATNA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION, BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, TIRHUT DIVISION, MUZAFFARPUR. 5. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, VAISHALI. 6. THE PRINCIPAL, G.A. INTER SCHOOL, HAJIPUR, VAISHALI. ----------- 2 30.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent State. The grievances of the petitioner is that her wife was a school teacher in G.A. Inter School Hajipur, while remaining in the service she was nominated as a member of the Juvenile Justice Board at Muzaffarpur vide Memo no. 1017 dated 20th of December 2004 as contained in Annexure-2 subsequently she was nominated as member of the Juvenile Justice Board at Patna vide Memo no. 322 dated 22nd of February 2008. The grievance of the petitioner is that he is entitled to receive the retiral dues of his wife after her death on 25th of February 2010. Learned counsel for the State submits that the 2 claim of the petitioner needs to be verified from the record. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 5 with a copy to respondent nos. 3 and 6 stating details of the unpaid claims as also copy of relevant documents in support of such claim along with the certified copy of the present order. In case such representation is filed, the claim of the petitioner be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months of a receipt of such representation so that grievance may be settled and the admitted dues if any may also be paid with interest permissible under the rule. However, upon consideration if any of the claims or part of the claims is being not paid the same may be informed to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observation/directions. Amrendra/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)