1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Cril.Application No.640 of 2010 Pradip Kaniram Jadhav ..vs.. State of Mah. Cril.Appliation No.786 of 2010. Pravin Vasantrao Shinde ..vs.. State of Mah. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- C ORAM : C.L.PANGARKAR, J. DATED : 24th June,, 2010. Heard Mr.Piyush Sayare, learned counsel for the applicants and Smt.T.D.Khade, APP for the State. These two applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure can be disposed of by a common order. A crime has been registered against both the applicants/accused being crime No.45 of 2010 by police Station, Yeotmal (city). The offence has been registered under Section 306 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The said offence was registered against six persons. It was alleged that all these six persons have instigated the deceased to commit 2 suicide and accordingly the offence came to be registered. Out of these, four persons namely; Babukhan Faruqui, Mohan Biyale, Amol Kunjibehari Biyale and Vyankatesh Gute have filed Criminal Application No.606 of 2010. That application had came up before the court for hearing on 21/6/2010 and it was disposed of. it was found by the court while disposing of the said application that the F.I.R. does not disclose any kind of offence and therefore, FIR itself was quashed as against those four persons. Since these two petitions arise out of the same FIR, for the reasons stated in the Judgment in Criminal Application No.606 of 2010, this FIR in these two applications, which are under challenge, also stand quashed. Hamdast allowed. JUDGE. chute 3