C.R. No.4970 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.4970 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 9.8.2010 Gurdish Singh ……Petitioner VERSUS Rattan Chand ……Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH -.- Present: Mr. Ritesh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that on 18.5.2010 written statement was ready, however, learned Counsel could not reach in time before the learned trial Court and could not seek permission from the learned trial Court to take on record the written statement. Learned Counsel for the petitioner further states that defendant/petitioner shall move an application before the learned trial Court enclosing therewith written statement seeking permission C.R. No.4970 of 2010 (O&M) -2- from the learned trial Court to take written statement on record after condoning the delay in filing the same. Learned Counsel for the petitioner further states that request for condoning the delay in filling the written statement shall also be made before the learned trial Court. 2. After arguing for sometime, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to move aforesaid application. 3. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. If defendant/petitioner moves such an application alongwith written statement with request to the learned trial Court for recalling the impugned order and to permit the petitioner to place on record the written statement after condoning the delay in filing the same, the same shall be decided by the learned trial Court in accordance with law. ( ALOK SINGH ) 09th August, 2010 JUDGE ashish