IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MA No.560 of 2008 1. MOST.JHARKAN DEVI, WIFE OF LATE RAM BABU YADAV. 2. UDAY YADAV 3. BINOD YADAV. BOTH SONS OF LATE RAM BABU YADAV. ALL RESIDENT OF MOHALLA-SADIKPUR JOGI, SANJAY GANDHI NAGAR ROAD NO.9, P.S. PATRAKAR NAGAR, DISTRICT-PATNA. …………………….APPELLANTS/OPPOSITE PARTIES IV TO VI. Versus 1. THE ESTATE OF LATE RAM BABU YADAV. 2. SMT. SANGEETA DEVI, WIFE OF SRI MANISH KUMAR, RESIDENT OF GATE NO.15 ½ , KANKARBAGH, UNDER PATRAKAR NAGAR, POLICE STATION, TOWN AND DISTRICT- PATNA. ……………………………...RESPONDENT IST SET/PETITIONER. 3. MANISH KUMAR ALLEGED TO BE SONS OF LATE RAM BABU YADAV. 4. URMILA DEVI ALLEGED TO BE WIDOW OF LATE RAM BABU YADAV. 5. SAROJ DEVI ALIAS SANGEETA DEVI ALLEGED TO BE DAUGHTER OF LATE RAM BABU YADAV. ………………………RESPONDENT NO.2 TO 4 ALL RESIDENTS OF GATE NO.15 ½ , KANKARBAGH UNDER PATRAKARNAGAR, POLICE STATION, TOWN AND DISTRICT-PATNA. ----------- For the Appellants : Mr. Avinash Kumar, Advocate. -------------- 3. 30.3.2009. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants who are Opposite Party Nos.4 to 6 in Probate Case No.19 of 2008 and through this appeal they have challenged the order dated 10.7.2008 passed by the learned Presiding Judge, Fast Track Court No.IV, Patna, whereby both the parties have been directed to maintain status quo till final hearing of the case. Whereas, as submitted by the appellants, the aforesaid will, it was voluntarily executed by her father-in-law, deceased Rambabu Yadav, the defendants claim that the will is not genuine. - 2 - The specious stand of the parties can only be resolved by leading evidence. As of now, no one can say with conviction whether the will in question was properly executed or was not genuine. In the circumstances, I find no error in the order of the learned Presiding Judge, Fast Track Court No.IV, Patna, directing both the parties to maintain status quo till final hearing of the case. In the aforesaid circumstances, this Misc. Appeal is dismissed. P.S. (Abhijit Sinha,J)