1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7131 OF 2008 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders. Mr.Omkar Warange for the petitioner. Mr.P.S.Dani for respondent no.1. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 24/09/2010 PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This petition is directed against the order dated 2.9.2008 passed by the trial Court rejecting the petitioner's application at Exhibit-109. In this application (Exhibit-109) the petitioner sought review of the order passed on the applications at Exhibit-87 and Exhibit-105. The review was sought on the ground that the application at Exhibit-87 was not disposed of on merits. It is pertinent to note that the petitioner has not challenged the basic order passed on the application at Exhibit-87 and 105 in this petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner even in the course S 2 of arguments did not seeks such liberty. Keeping that in view and for the reasons recorded in the impugned order so also the nature of prayers in all these applications I find absolutely no merit worth interfering with the impugned order in writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. As observed by the learned Judge it is clear that these applications were filed only to delay the proceedings. Hence the petition is dismissed. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)