IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : Crl. W. P. No. 1690 of 2011 Date of Decision : September 19, 2011 Samuel .... Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. H. S. Batth, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Chawla, Advocate for respondent no. 5. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Pursuant to notice of motion, respondent no.5 has appeared through counsel. Respondent no.5 is also present in Court in person along with his wife and daughter Alka – alleged detenue. Alleged detenue Alka states that she is voluntarily residing with her parents and wants to continue to reside with her parents and does not want to go to or live with the petitioner and that she has already filed divorce petition against the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid submission of the alleged detenue, the instant Habeas Corpus writ petition is dismissed. September 19, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE