BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fifteenth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.10960 of 2011 SARAVANAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.3 Vs STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE K.PUDUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.1179/2011, ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT FOR PETITIONER : M/S.N.SATHISH BABU ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT : MR.A.RAMAR ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL UNDER SEC. 438 CR.P.C. ORDER : THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER :- The petitioner/Accused No.3 apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 387 and 506(ii) IPC in Crime No.1179 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and the case has been registered under Sections 387 and 506(ii) as if he demanded 'Mamul” from the de-facto complainant along with A! and A2. This petitioner arrayed as A3. A1 and A2 were arrested and enlarged on bail and the investigation is considerably over and hence he prays for anticipatory bail. 3.Refuting the same, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner is arrayed as A3 and the case has been registered against three persons under Sections 387 and 506(ii) for the alleged occurrence took place on 27.07.2011. He fairly conceded that A1 and A2 were already arrested and enlarged on bail. A3 threatened the de- facto complainant demanding money and no previous case against the petitioner and the investigation is going on and hence he prays for dismissal of this application. 4.Considering the rival submissions made on both sides, the alleged occurrence took place on 27.07.2011. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with A1 and A2 threatening the de-facto complainant and demanding money and hence the complaint was given and the case has been registered under Sections 387 and 506(ii) IPC. Admittedly, A1 and A2 were arrested and enlarged on bail and even though the petitioner was not arrested he neither interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate NO.II, Madurai and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-[Rupees ten thousand only] with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai, and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. sd/- 15/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, MADURAI. 2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K.PUDUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC TO M/S.N.SATHISH BABU ADVOCATE SR.NO.31746. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10960 of 2011 Date :15/09/2011 2P/6C RPB 19.09.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/