•l' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. Appellants Claimants Respondents Misc. Appeal (Cl No. 734of 2007 1. Smt. Savita Sahu, Wd/o Late Sewak Ram Sahu, Aged about 32 years. 2. Ku. Dolly Sahu, D/o Late Sewak Ram Sahu, aged about 9 years. 3. Ku. Tanuja Sahu, D/o Late Sewak Ram Sahu, Aged about 7 years. 4. Smt. Ramotin Bai Sahu, W/o Amrit Lal Sahu, Aged about 70 years. 5. Amrit Lal Sahu, S/o Devi Singh Sahu, Aged about 72 years. Minor Appellant No.2 & 3 represented by their Natural Guardian and mother Smt. Savita Sahu, Appellant No.1. All R/o Housing Colony, Raipur, Behind Tower Line, Police Quarter No. C/14, Police Line Thana, District Raipur, (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Prem Vishwakarma, S/o Moolchand Vishwakarma (Driver), Aged about 38 years, R/o Shyam Nagar, Raipur C.G. (Driver of the Vehicle Sumo bearing Regd. No.-C.G. 19-D-0143) 2. Veerbhuwan Gadpale, S/o Sukhdev Gadpale, R/o Shriram Nagar, Kanker, District Kanker, C.G. (Owner of the Vehicle Sumo bearing Regd. No. C.G. - 19-D-0143) 3. The New India Insurance Company Ltd., Through - Divisional Manager, The New India Insurance Company Ltd., Division Office No. 1, Jail Raod, Raipur, District Raipur C.G. (Insurer of the Vehicle Sumo bearing Regd. No. C.G. - 19- D - 0143) 4. Kristina Kumar Verma, S/o Chain Singh Verma (Driver) R/o Gaya Nagar, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) (Driver of the Truck bearing Regd. No. C.G.04-ZC2133) 5. Amit Kumar Mandhani, S/o B.R. Mandhani, R/o Bhatapara, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) (Owner of Truck bearing Regd. No. C.G. 04-ZC 2133) •^ ^) 6. The Oriental Insurance'<Corfipany Ltd., through Divisional Manager, The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Jail Road, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) (Insurer of Truck bearing Regd. No. C.G. 04-ZC 2133) Appeal under section 173 of Wlotor Vehicle Act. 1988 Present: ShriVimalesh Bajpai, counsel forthe appellants/Claimants. No one appears for respondents No.1 & 2. Shri Saurabh Sharma, counsel for respondent No.3 No one appears for respondents No.4 & 5. Shri Sudhir Agrawal, counsel for respondent No.6 ORALORDER (Passedonl 1.12.2007) Shri Saurabh Sharma, counsel for respondentNo.3fThe New India Insurance Company Ltd. submits that he would not press on the cross- objection/appeal under Order 41 Rule 22 of C.P.C. filed by the insurance company. Accordingly, cross-objection/appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Consequent to the dismissal of the cross-objection/appeal, Shri Vimalesh Bajpai, counsel for the appellants/claimants submit that he would also not press on this appeal. In view of the above, this Misc.Appeal stands dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge