IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.23444 of 2011 BETWEEN Sandeep Yadav and another. ... PETITIONERS AND The Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and seven others. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. N. SRINIVAS YADAV. Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners points out the pending application ﬁled before the Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal, registered as Case.No.B/21/2010 and also submits that the report of the Revenue Inspector dated 22.03.2010 is already submitted but no orders are being passed by the Tahsildar. 2. Learned Government Pleader states that though the said application is pending there is also a civil suit being O.S.No.123 of 2010 pending before the Principle District Judge, Rangareddy District. 3. Irrespective of the pendency of the civil suit, there is no reason as to why the ﬁrst respondent should not pass appropriate orders on the petitioners’ application, referred to above and keeping it pending indefinitely would seriously be prejudicial to the petitioners. 4. In the circumstances, I deem it appropriate to direct the ﬁrst respondent to consider the petitioners’ application, referred to above, after notice and after hearing the respondents named therein, and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, expeditiously within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J December 7, 2011 DSK