IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21169 of 2011 Ranjeet Sharma Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02/ 20.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 1.9.2008 in a case registered under section 395 of the IPC and it is alleged that he was identified in TI Parade by one witness. Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by this court vide order dated 30.11.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 12985/2010 with liberty to him to renew his prayer for bail if the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within six moths from the above stated date. The impugned order reveals that up till now not a single witness has been examined in this case though the trial court has taken steps to procure attendance of the prosecution witnesses. Considering the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Ranjeet Sharma, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Sessions Judge II, Patna in Sessions Trial no. 2566/2008 arising out of Patliputra P.S. Case no. 165/2008 subject to the conditions that one of the sureties must be close relative of the petitioner and furthermore, petitioner shall ensure his presence before the learned trial court on each and every date for the period of one year and if he fails to do so on three consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the 2 petitioner. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)