IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.364 of 2011 UPENDRA KUMAR VERMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. with CWJC No.3019 of 2005 UPENDRA KUMAR VERMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 9.2.2011 The petitioner is directed to make correction in memo of M.J.C. application in course of the day wherein the name of Upendra Kumar Verma has been shown as the petitioner since the substitution petition filed on behalf of Late Upendra Kumar Verma has been allowed and his wife Savitri Devi has been substituted in his place. This modification petition has been filed for correction of paragraph no.1 of the writ petition wherein it has been mentioned that the second time bound promotion due to the petitioner is from the year, 1998. Counsel for the petitioner submits that it should be read as 1988 as the second time bound promotion was due to him since 1988. Due to typing error at paragraph nos.1 and 5 the order also mentions that the petitioner claims time bound promotion from 1998. Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to correct paragraph nos. 1 and 5 of the writ petition. As a consequence of the correction in the writ petition, 2 the order, dated 11.1.2011 shall also stand corrected and be read as 1988, the year from which the petitioner is claiming second time bound promotion. This modification application is thus allowed. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)