IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7339 of 2008 1. ARUANGZEB MALLICK SON OF MD. AINUL HAQUE 2. TAHIR MALLICK SON OFAURANGZEB MALLICK 3. MD. ASHIF SON OF AURANGZEB MALLICK 4. HARUN MALLICK SON OF MD. NISAR 5. MD. FAZLU RAHMAN SON OF LATE RAHIM PAHALWAN 1 TO 5 ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAEES P.S. PAKARIBARAWAN, DISTRICT-NAWADA. 6. YASHWANT YADAV SON OF LATE PRABHU YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ABIDBIGHA, P.S PAKARIBARAWAN, DISTRICT-NAWADA. --PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. ARVIND PASWAN SON OF SHREE PASWAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DOLA, P.S. PAKARIBARAWAN, DISTRICT-NAWADA. --OPP.PARTIES ______ For the Petitioners : Mr. Birendra Kumar For opp.party no.2 : Mr. Pankaj Kumar For the State : Mr. R.B. Roy 3 28.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. This application has been filed seeking quashing of order dated 31.01.2008 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in Pakribarawan P.S. Case no.65 of 2007 taking cognizance for the offences under Sections 147, 341, 323, 504 of the Indian Penal Code besides Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe 2 (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The main grievance, as contended by the learned counsel, is that finding no merit attracting offences under Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, the Police did not submit charge sheet for such offences but court below took cognizance for the offences under the said Act also. My attention was drawn towards the contents of the first information report wherein there is nothing to show that occurrence took place at public place and in public view. Moreover, it is also submitted at the Bar that difference between the parties has been amicably resolved. Taking into consideration all aspects, the impugned order to the extent taking cognizance for the offences under Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act is quashed. The application is, accordingly, disposed of. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad