1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.17 OF 2006 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.816 OF 1995 Ravindra N. Sanghavi. ..Applicant. V/s. Laxman R.Nagarkar(since deceased) through heirs and L.Rs. Jagdish Laxman Nagarkar & Ors. ..Respondents. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.28 OF 2006 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.816 OF 1995 Laxman R.Nagarkar(since deceased) through heirs and L.Rs. Jagdish Laxman Nagarkar. ..Applicant. V/s. Shri Ravindra N. Sanghvi & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.R.N.Sanghavi for applicant in C.A.No.17/06 & respondents in C.A.No.28/06. Mr.S.P.Thorat for respondents in C.A.No.17/06 & applicant in 28/06. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : APRIL 12, 2006. DATE : APRIL 12, 2006. DATE : APRIL 12, 2006. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Not on board. 2. As counsel for the applicant in Civil 2 Application No.53 of 2006 has given assurance to deposit the costs in the court in the course of the day, office to accept the amount, if offered in the course of the day. On this assurance, in view of the order passed in Civil Application No.53 of 2006, present applications are taken on board. 3. Mr.Thorat waives notice for respondent No. 1(b). As the Civil Application No.17 of 2006 is in time, the same is granted in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out within two weeks from today. 4. In view of the order passed in Civil Application No.17 of 2006, nothing survives in Civil Application No.28 of 2006. The same is disposed of accordingly.