IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1036 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.1036 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.1036 OF 2008 Dikshant Rohidas Tandel ... Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr. N.U. Khan for the applicant. Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : V.C. DAGA, J : V.C. DAGA, J : V.C. DAGA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 25TH JUNE, 2008 : 25TH JUNE, 2008 : 25TH JUNE, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. :- :- :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R. No.I-496/2006 registered with Nerul Police Station for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 302, 201 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. This application is moved after having suffered adverse order of bail at the hands of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Thane passed in Order below Exhibit 1 dtd. 20/12/2007. 4. Reproduced herebelow is Para 3 of the order of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, 2 in which following observations are made. "3. It revealed during investigation that the applicant and other accused persons were last seen together in the company of the deceased. They took the deceased for drinking beer and then they went away. There was scuffle. There is strong prima facie circumstantial evidence on the point of last seen together. Moreover, it has come in the statement of co-accused that the applicant caught hold hands of deceased when his murder was committed." 4. Having heard and having seen the order and the observations made therein, I do not think this is a fit case for grant of bail. 5. In the result, the application is rejected. ( V.C. DAGA, J.) V.C. DAGA, J.) V.C. DAGA, J.)