IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1) Criminal Misc. No. 6445 of 2011 Date of Decision: 20.07.2011 Kewal Singh and another ..Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another ..Respondent 2) Criminal Misc. No. 13273 of 2011 Date of Decision: 20.07.2011 Chamkaur Singh ..Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. G.B.S.Dhillon, Advocate, for the petitioner Pritpal Singh in Crl. Misc.M. No. 6445 of 2011 Petition dismissed as withdrawn qua petitioner No.1 Kewal Singh vide order dated 4.3.2011in Crl. Misc.M. No. 6445 of 2011 Mr. Sunil Chadha, Advocate, for the petitioner Chamkaur Singh in Criminal Misc. No. 13273 of 2011 Mr. S.K.Jain, Advocate, for respondent No.2 Darshan Singh in Crl. Misc.M. No. 6445 of 2011 Mr. Rajinder Math, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. *** AJAY TEWARI. J. (ORAL) Both these petitions have been filed for grant of regular bail to the petitioners in case FIR No. 6 dated 19.01.2011 under Sections 420,467, 468, 471, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code registered at Police Station Dakha, District Ludhiana. Criminal Misc. No. 6445 of 2011 [2]\ On 04.03.2011, the following contention was noticed by this Court in Criminal Misc. No. M. 6445 of 2011:- “Learned counsel for the petitioners wishes to withdraw the present petition for anticipatory bail qua petitioner No.1 Kewal Singh. Dismissed as withdrawn qua petitioner No.1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the sale consideration has been paid through cheques to Darshan Singh and the petitioner has identified the correct person.” Thereafter on 20.04.2011, learned State Counsel was directed to verify about the factum of payment. On instructions from ASI Amrit Singh, learned Assistant Advocate General, Punjab has confirmed that the payment has indeed been deposited in the account of Darshan Singh. Learned counsel for the complainant has, however, argued that the petitioners have already taken the benefit of the simplicity of respondent No.2 and as soon as the bail is granted to them, they will again withdraw the money. Learned counsel for the petitioners undertake not to withdraw the money from the account of Darshan Singh. In this view of the matter, order dated 04.03.2011 passed in Criminal Misc. No. 6445 of 2011 and order 03.06.2011 passed in Criminal Misc. No. M.-13273 of 2011 are made absolute. With these observations, both the petitions stand disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE 20.07.2011 'ravinder'