IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45849 of 2008 MD.ZAMIL & MD. MISTER Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 27.11.2008 Heard Sri Ratnesh Nandan Sinha, Advocate for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioners are not named in the FIR of a case under Section 302 IPC and their name appeared coming out in belated statements recorded in paragraph 48 and onwards of the case diary. The contention is that the wife of the deceased in paragraph 48 firstly named the petitioners and others as having participated in the commission of the murder of her husband. The further contention in the above connection is that if the lady knew about the participation to the petitioners and others there is no reason for making such belated statements and for not naming the petitioners at the earliest occasion. Let the above named two petitioners be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in Begusarai Mufassil P.S.Case No.86 of 2008. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )