IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 1416, 1417 & 1432 of 2011. Decided on: 24th March, 2011. CWP No.1416 of 2011: Rajender Paul Thakur and others vs. State of H.P. & ors. CWP No.1417 of 2011: Raghunanda vs. State of H.P. & ors. CWP No.1432 of 2011: Hukam Chand vs. State of H.P. & anr. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioners : Ms. Aruna Sharma, Vice Counsel. For the Respondents : Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim the benefit of ad hoc service followed by regular service for the purpose of increments, pay fixation, pension etc. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in LPA No.36 of 2010, Sita Ram vs. State. It is for the respondents to examine the matters. Therefore, these writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondent concerned to examine the matter(s) in the light of the judgment referred to above and take appropriate action thereon within a period of four months from the date of the production of a copy of this judgment along with copy of the writ petition(s) and the copy of the judgment referred to above, by the petitioner concerned. 2. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice March 24, 2011. (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (bss/pankaj) Judge. 2