1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 7740 of 2011. Decided on: 9th September, 2011. Bishan Lal ......Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh .....Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate For the respondent : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “A. Writ of mandamus be issued against the respondents which are the statutory authority to perform and act in accordance with law and the respondents b e directed to transfer the petitioner to the station of his choice as given in Annexure P/2.” 2 2. The petitioner submits that he has submitted Annexure P-2, representation before the respondent. There will be a direction to the respondent to take action on Annexure P-2, adverting to the submissions made therein, within a period of one month from the date of production of a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the respondent. 3. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 9th September, 2011. (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (hl) Judge.