IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6016 of 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 6016 of 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 6016 of 2007 Prabhakar Pandurang Vichare .. Petitioner versus The Collector of Raigad & ors. .. Respondents WRIT PETITION NO. 6012 of 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 6012 of 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 6012 of 2007 Mohan Babaji Vichare .. Petitioner versus The Collector of Raigad & ors. .. Respondents WRIT PETITION NO. 6014 of 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 6014 of 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 6014 of 2007 Khotu Hanumant Vichare .. Petitioner versus The Collector of Raigad & ors. .. Respondents WRIT PETITION NO. 6036 of 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 6036 of 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 6036 of 2007 Madhusudan Gajanan Vichare .. Petitioner versus The Collector of Raigad & ors. .. Respondents ... Mr.Rahul Thakker i/b Smt.Swati Palande for the petitioners. Mr.V.A. Sonpal AGP for respondent nos.1, 2, and 4 to 6 for the respondents. CORAM : S.B. MHASE AND CORAM : S.B. MHASE AND CORAM : S.B. MHASE AND D.G.KARNIK, JJ DATED : 24th September 2007 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGP for the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the only anxiety of the petitioners was that the Land Acquisition proceedings should be completed expeditiously and notification under section 6 be issued expeditiously. 3. There is no dispute that the notification under section 4 was issued as recently as on 15th February 2007. The statutory period for completion of the enquiry and making of a declaration under section 6 is one year. Learned AGP states that there is still sufficient time and enquiry under section 5A is in progress. It would be completed and declaration would be made within the statutory period. In view of the statement made by the learned AGP, nothing survives in the petitions. 4. Petitions are accordingly disposed of. (D.G. KARNIK, J) (S.B. MHASE, J)