1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 4 OF 2008 IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 102 OF 2007 IN SUMMERY SUIT NO. 2751 OF 2006 Kishin G. Advani and Anr. .... Petitioners. V/s. Ghansham Singh Narang. .... Respondent. ....... Mr. Swapnil Bangur i/b. Mr. Manohar Dhameja for the Petitioners. Mr. Uttam G. Tahiliani for the Respondent. ........ CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 12TH MARCH 2008. P.C. :- The order that was passed in the Summons for Judgment was in terms of the statement of the learned Counsel for the Defendant. The order records the statement correctly and the Review Petition cannot therefore be countenanced. This is a sheer abuse of the 2 process of the Court. The Review Petition is dismissed with costs quantified at Rs.3,000/-. ------