IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1382 of 2009 1.Mazharuddin Ansari son of late Gudar Ansari, R/o Village Rampur, P.S. Chiraiya Dist. East Champaran ……Petitioner. Versus 1.The State of Bihar 2.Rukhsana Khatoon D/o Islam Ansari, R/o village Vitharwa, P.S. Patahi, Dist. East Champaran…O.Ps. ------------- For the petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mrs. Indu Bala Pandey, A.P.P. -------- 3 18.10.2011 The petitioner has preferred this revision application under Section 19(4) of the Family Court Act against the order dated 11.6.2009 passed by the Principal Judge Family Court, Motihari East Champaran in Maintenance Case no. 144/09 by which he has been directed to pay a sum of Rs. 1800/- per month to the O.P. No.2 for the interim maintenance of her two sons Jalaluddin and Jamaluddin. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the O.P. no.2 is a member of M.C.C. and her father is zonal Commander of the M.C.C. The complainant is area commander of the M.C.C. and the two sons of the petitioner reside with him and he maintains both of them. From perusal of the impugned order it appears that the petitioner has not filed any rejoinder to the petition dated 30.5.2009 filed by the O.P. no.2 in the aforesaid maintenance case. More over interim order has been passed and the main case for maintenance as Maintenance Case No. 144 of 2009 is still pending before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Motihari. I do not find any ground to interfere with the 2 impugned order at this stage. However, this petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to raise his grievance before the Learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Motihari . The application stands disposed of. M.Rahman (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J)