2910mca716.10.odt 1 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.716 of 2010 (Sandeepkumar s/o. Nandalalji Saraiya .vs. State and Ors.) with Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.812 of 2010 (Ku. Smita G. Ambade and anr. vs. State and Ors. with Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.813 of 2010 (Ms Bhagyashree S. Gawate .vs. State and Ors.) with Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.814 of 2010 (Sanjay B. Deshmukh and Ors. vs. State and Ors.) with Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.815 of 2010 (Tikaram D. Samrit .vs. State and Ors.) with Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.816 of 2010 (Najukram s/o. Dinanath Bankar .vs. State and Ors.) with Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.817 of 2010 (Anil G. Dodewar .vs. State and Ors.) with Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.818 of 2010 (Manmohan S. Bhaisare and Ors. vs. State and Ors.) with Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.819 of 2010 (Gajanan Bhaurao Jangale .vs. Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University and anr.) with Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.820 of 2010 (Ku. Sheetal R. Gomkar .vs. State and Ors.) with Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.821 of 2010 (Ajit V. Khajgiwale .vs. State and Ors.) with Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.822 of 2010 (Raju Laxman Ade .vs. State and Ors.) 2910mca716.10.odt 2 . with Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.823 of 2010 (Mrs. Arti B. Padole .vs. State and Ors.) with Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.824 of 2010 (Gajanan S. Raut .vs. State and Ors.) with Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.825 of 2010 (Arvind D. Borkar and Ors. vs. State and Ors. with Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.826 of 2010 (Mrs. Pournima H. Rahangdale .vs. State and Ors.) with Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.827 of 2010 (Anant s/o. Atmaram Rindhe .vs. State and Ors.) with Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.828 of 2010 (Anup V. Gumble .vs. State and Ors.) with Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.829 of 2010 (Ms Reema d/o. Khialdas Kamlani vs. State and Ors.) with Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.830 of 2010 (Sunil s/o. Gajananrao Dhakulkar .vs. Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University and anr.) with Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.831 of 2010 (Prakash s/o. Dhondiba Shrungare .vs. Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University and anr.) with Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.832 of 2010 (Anand s/o. Gurnomal Thadani .vs. State and Ors.) with Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.833 of 2010 (Ashwin s/o. Shivcharan Meshram .vs. State and Ors.) with Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.834 of 2010 (Shrawan B. Kapgate and Ors. vs. State and Ors.) with 2910mca716.10.odt 3 . Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.835 of 2010 (Ashok s/o. Ramdasji Salame .vs. State and Ors.) with Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.836 of 2010 (Ku. Pramila D. Bhoyar .vs. State and Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Coram: S. A. Bobde and A.B.Chaudhari, JJ. Date : 29/10/2010. Heard Mr. A.S.Chandurkar, Adv. for the applicant, Ms Tajwar Khan, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent no.1, Mr.B.G.Kulkarni, Adv. for respondent no. 2 and Mr.S.B.Bangde, Adv. holding for Mr.S.K.Mishra, Assistant Solicitor General of India. Vide order dt. October 01, 2010, after hearing the learned Counsel for the parties, on the request made by Mr.S.K.Mishra, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India, the matter was adjourned for filing an affidavit specifically pointing out that the UGC has taken a decision to withdraw the specific exemption granted to the candidates in the meeting dated 23rd February, 2010. 2910mca716.10.odt 4 . Today, Mr. Mr.S.B.Bangde, Adv. holding for Mr.S.K.Mishra, Assistant Solicitor General of India has tendered one affidavit sworn by Mr.B.K.Singh, Deputy Secretary, University Grants Commission, New Delhi and invited our attention to para 7 therein. He submits that the present affidavit is in compliance of the said order. Having gone through the para No.7, we find that the UGC has stated therein that the exemptions granted in its meeting dt. 23.2.2010 vide agenda item No.6.04 and 6.05 have been withdrawn. By this statement, we are given to understand that there is no exception in the matter of withdrawal of exemptions which were granted in the said 468th meeting, dt. 23.2.2010. Recording his statement, we do not find it necessary now to go ahead with the review petition since, in our opinion, the purpose for which the review petition was filed and registered has been achieved. In the result, we dispose of the review application in terms of the above statement made by the U.G.C. No order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE jais