1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 1169 OF 2005 1 Vishnu s/o Anna Khedkar, age: 60 years, Occ: Agril., R/o Pimpri-Amba, Tq. and District Latur. 2 Dnyaneshwar s/o Vishnu Khedkar, age: 22 years, Occ: Agril., R/o Pimpri-Amba, Tq. and District Latur. 3 Tukaram s/o Vishnu Khedkar, age: 20 years, Occ: Agril., R/o Pimpri-Amba, Tq. and District Latur. Appellants Versus Mahadev s/o Chandrakant Salunke, age: minor under guardianship of father Chandrakant Sitaram Salunke, age: 45 years, Occ: Agril., R/o Khandapur, Tq. & Dist.Latur. Respondents Mr.K.J.Ghute Patil, advocate for appellants. Mr.R.S.Deshmukhj, advocate for Respondents. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 10th August, 2009. P.C.: 1 This is an appeal by original defendants raising exception to the concurrent judgments recorded by both the Courts below. 2 2 Respondent-plaintiff instituted suit, being Regular Civil Suit No.82/2003 claiming declaratory relief in respect of ownership as well as restraint order against defendants no.1 to 3 restraining them from causing obstruction in his peaceful possession over the suit land. 3 The trial Court, after recording evidence of the parties, decreed the suit of plaintiff. The first appeal, presented by defendants, bearing Regular Civil Appeal No.25 of 2004 also came to be dismissed by District Judge, Latur on 20.09.2004. 4 I have perused the judgments delivered by both the Courts below. The argument advanced on behalf of appellants is essentially a matter relating to appreciation of evidence. No substantial question of law arises for consideration in the second appeal. 5 Appeal, therefore, stands dismissed. Civil Application No. 9408/2006 does not survive and stand disposed of accordingly. (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE ******* adb/sa116905