IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. : 4473 of 2008. Decided on: 18th August, 2010. _________________________________________________________ Jagdish Sharma. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. D.P. Gupta, Advocate vice Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 and 2. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For respondent No. 3. : Ms. Lalita Verma, Advocate vice Mr. Ramakant Sharma and Mr. J.L. Bhardwaj, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge(Oral): The case of the petitioner was considered for the post of Grade-IV by the respondent-Bank. However, the petitioner did not fulfill the requisite essential qualification of diploma in Cooperation or Secretary Certificate Course. 2. Ms. Lalita Verma, learned vice counsel for respondent No. 3 submits that the petitioner was not having the requisite essential qualification and in the absence of same, he could not be appointed for the post of Grade-IV. 3. Since the petitioner was not in possession of the essential qualification, as mentioned hereinabove, there is no illegality in the action of respondent-Bank in not appointing the 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.No. petitioner. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge August 18, 2010. (bhupender)