IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.24462 of 2002 Between: The Bharani Mutually Aided Coop Housing Society Ltd., rep by its President Sri V.Rajeswar Rao, Regd No.AMC/RR/DCO/ Hacing its office at 12-2-725/3, P& T Colony, Rethi Bowli, Hyd. ..... PETITIONER AND Municipal Corp of Hyd., rep by its Commissioner, Hyd. .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.VIJAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent:MR. R.RADHA KRISHNA REDDY(SC FOR GHMC,SNCZONE) The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus to declare the inaction of the respondent in initiating action for demolition of illegal and unauthorized structures said to have been raised around the old tiled house bearing No.12-2-505 situated in Survey Nos.14, 15, 367, 368, 384 to 387 of Gudimalkapur Village, Asifnagar Mandal, Hyderabad, as illegal and arbitrary. Heard Sri M.Vijaya Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.Radhakrishna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Corporation. The grievance of the petitioner society in this writ petition is that the petitioner’s vendors, who are stated to have entered into an agreement of sale, are making attempts to alienate the property by raising illegal and unauthorized structures and the respondent despite being sensitized by the petitioner, failed to take any action to demolish the same. The petitioner failed to implead its vendors, who have allegedly raised the unauthorized constructions. It has failed to explain the reason for non-impleadment of its vendors. In my considered view, no relief can be granted behind the back of the petitioner’s vendors who are stated to have raised the constructions, as granting of any such relief would adversely affect their interests. As the petitioner has not offered any explanation, much less, a plausible one for its failure to implead its vendors, who are not only proper but also necessary parties, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed for non-joinder of necessary parties. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition, interim order, dated 10.12.2002 is vacated and WPMP.No.30772 of 2002 is dismissed. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 18th MARCH, 2009. kvni