1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.277 OF 2009 Pandurang S/o.Hari Hiwale APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra, and others RESPONDENTS Mr.R.V.Gore, learned counsel for the applicant. Mr.N.B.Patil, learned APP for respondent/ State (CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.) DATE : 01/12/2009 PER COURT : 1. By the present revision application, the applicant has challenged the order of acquittal passed in Regular Criminal Case no. 80/2007 by J.M.F.C.Gangapur, Dist. Aurangabad vide judgment and order dated 29/08/2009 acquitting respondent no.2 and 3. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for applicant original complainant. Also perused the judgment and order impugned in the present revision application . As this is a revision u/s. 401 of Cr.P.C., it is necessary for the revision applicant to make out the case that the material placed before the Trial Court was not properly appreciated and also the law point was not properly considered. On 2 perusal of the observations in para no.7, it is the admission of the complainant himself that there was no money lending transaction with respondent no.2 and 3. The alleged instrument which is registered one is a sale deed in between applicant herein and respondent no.2. The witnesses examined during the trial as well as during the investigation by the Investigation Officer whose evidence is discussed in para no.8 of the impugned judgment indicates that they only make vague allegations against respondent no.2, but they are unable to give material particulars about day, date and month when the transaction took place. Apart from it, there is vital admission in the evidence of this witness that no any document was executed to that effect between the parties. Considering these observations in the judgment impugned in this criminal revision, the revision sans any merit, even it is not necessary to issue notice to the respondents. Hence the revision stands dismissed in limine. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/DEC 2009/cri.rev.277-09