In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 3077 of 2009 Date of decision: May 26, 2009 Jaskaran Singh .. Petitioner Vs. Satnam Singh .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. S.K. Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N. Jindal, J Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the trial court observed “opportunity given nil” regarding cross examination of Jaskaran Singh, Raghbir Singh and Ravail Singh D.Ws. As a matter of fact, the plaintiff-respondent never refused to cross examine, nor he ever opted not to cross examine the witnesses. The petitioner has submitted that his counsel could not cross examine the witnesses as he was busy in some other court, therefore, the petitioner should not suffer for the fault on the part of the counsel. Having pondered over the rights of the petitioner and in order to impart complete justice to the plaintiff/petitioner, this revision petition is disposed of with a direction to cross examine the witnesses on that very day when same are produced in the court subject to payment of Rs.2000/- as costs. No further opportunity to cross examine the witnesses would be provided. This petition is disposed of without issuing notice to the respondent with a view to impart complete justice to the parties and to save the huge expenses, which may be incurred by the respondent as also in order to avoid unnecessary delay in adjudication of the matter. Still, if dissatisfied, the respondent may move to this court for recalling this order. May 26, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge