.ti'f (^\ »!KIF BFNCS '•'l^iU- Pi-ESIi*'! f5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.l W. P. (S) NO.l^'2^ /2009 PETITIONER v> .^ /^. ^.t'/9/ / \^/'r'^ .-••'' ^ww ^w^' «^ <^/ /";^?x>"- RESPONDENTS Banwari Lal Sahu, S/o - Late Shri Bhandari ram Sahu, (} " Aged about 51 years R/o VUlage - Preninagar, Distt. Sarguja Presentiy working as Head Master In Middle school Vindhyachal, Block - Premnagar, Distt. Sarguja, Chhattisgarh, VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through - Secretary, Adim Jati & Anushuchit Jati Vikas Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Collector, Ambikapur, Distt. - Sarguja, Chhattisgarh, 3- Assistant Coininissioner, Tribal Welfare Ambikapur, Distt. Sarguja C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WMT IN THE NATUREOF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI ETC. .^ .iS^., ti(: -Wisa "^gs^-78 '"•'^3^'-" ^J^ CT>! .9^ •^ ^v' iVsfT- W3: ! ^ •^W'W'i.W^W'i. ?o|<'il+-4<i. ^j...i?.a>3...v-(.^. w^r'^q; (ipiy^;) Wnw fSy, 'sfT, 'Bl^fa'frf 'qitRff"? ftia ^fSTEOT ^; atfg»;3i!^i 'SBTHmraErSHKmWnCBTFRmNKBR U1WAKBR" 10.08.2009 Shri N.K.Mehta, counseljfor the petitioner. Shri Vivek Sharma, P. L. jbr the State. Grievance of the petiticjner is that the petitioner has been subjected to two transfer ordej's vide order dated 30.6.2009. by the first order Annexure P/3, the | petitioner has been transferred from Middle School Saraswatipur ^lock Prem Nagar to Middie School, Vindhyachal, Premnagar at tl^e option of Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare whereas by the jsecond order he has been transferred to Middie School, Gaare, Block Contention of counsel [Tamnar, Distt. Raigarh. |for the petitioner is that he is in confusion as to which order is 1|o be carried out by the petitioner. Counsel for the State' stibmits that let the petitioner make a representatiori and the same jwould be dedded in accordance with law. i Counsel for the petitioper agrees to make a representation. However he submits that til| his representation is decided, the petitioner may be given some protective order. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make a representation within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order, the same would be decided within a period of three weeks from the date of its receipt. Tiil then the iinpugned order shall not be given effect to and the petitioner be allowed to perfonn his duties in his present piace of postin£.__—- Sd/- pritinker Diwaker Judge _L