IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23339 of 2011 Mokhtar Mansury Versus The State Of Bihar ---------- 02. 05.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in connection with Chhauradano P.S. Case No. 05/2009 for the offences under Sections 364(A), 34 of the Indian Penal Code, is named accused in this case instituted against unknown relating to abduction of son of the informant who in his statement under Sections 161 and 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure did not disclose name of the petitioner. Submission is that in the extra judicial confession of co-accused petitioner’s name emerged without any otherwise allegation. However, parties have compromised the case and no longer intend to proceed against the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances, if any compromise petition is on record and the informant appears to support the factum of compromise with his freewill and consent without 2 any coercion and also stood as one of the bailors, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Raxaul, at Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with Chhauradano P.S. Case No. 05/2009, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/ ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)