WP(C) 2132/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Mr. A.S. Choudhury, learned senior counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Roy, learned Govt. Advocate who represents the respondents No. 1 and 2. The petitioner was settled with Pratapganj Hat, Go-Hat and Daily Bazar by the Dh ubri Zila Parishad upto 30.6.09. He has filed the instant petition to seek direc tion for consideration of his prayer for extension and remission as it is claime d that land could not operate the Hat in an efficient manner because of reasons beyond his control. It is seen that sale notice has already been issued on 2.5.0 9 by the Dhubri Zila Parishad (Annexure-6), whereby all the Bazars including the Pratapganj Hat, Go-Hat and Daily Bazar is put to sale. Under such circumstances, the prayer of the petitioner regarding extension of th e terms is not considered to be justified by the Court. However, on the claim for remission, the petitioner may file an appropriate appl ication before the Govt. under Rule 49 of the Assam Panchayat (Financial) Rules, 2002 within a week from today and if such a representation is filed, the Govt. is directed to consider the same on merit and pass appropriate orders expeditiou sly and preferably within 4 weeks after receipt of the representation. This writ petition is disposed of accordingly.