IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC NO. 2101 OF 2005 NARENDRA PRASAD SINGH VERSUS DR. SAMSHAD HUSSAIN & ORS WITH MJC No.2102 of 2005 SHIVA NANDAN SINGH Versus DR.SAMSHAD HUSSAIN & ORS ----------- 11/ 07.5.2008 Counsel for the University has filed show cause in both the contempt applications stating that the admitted retiral dues of the petitioner in each of the cases has been paid. Counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that petitioner is not satisfied with the quantum released. In the circumstances, petitioners are directed to represent before the Vice- Chancellor of the University, which representation should be considered and disposed of by the Vice-Chancellor himself as early as possible, in any case within one month of its receipt and if any further amount is found due to the petitioners then such amount be also paid to them within the same period. Both the contempt applications are, accordingly, disposed of. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)