THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR CRL.P.NO.4609 OF 2009 ORDER 1. Heard the petitioners’ counsel Sri A.Sai Kumar and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor. 2. The petitioners’ counsel says that he may be permitted to withdraw the criminal petition so far as the ﬁrst petitioner is concerned and accordingly, in respect of the ﬁrst petitioner, this criminal petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. So far as the 2nd petitioner is concerned, she is stated to be the mother-in-law of the de facto complainant, while the 4th petitioner is stated to be the sister of the de facto complainant’s husband and 3rd petitioner is her husband. The oﬀences alleged are those punishable under Sections 498-A, 352, 506 (2) read with 34 IPC. 4. A perusal of the allegations in the charge sheet would show that this cannot be said to a case where even if the said allegations are believed, they do not disclose any offence. 5. In the circumstances, the relief for quashing the case cannot be granted and that relief is refused. 6. It is brought to my notice that 2nd and 4th petitioners are women and 3rd petitioner is stated to be a daily wage earner and they cannot attend the Court for every date of hearing. 7. In view of this representation, the presence of petitioners 2 to 4 for every date of hearing before the trial Court is dispensed with subject of- course to the discretion of the trial Court to summon their presence as and when it considers it necessary. 8. This criminal petition is accordingly disposed of. ____________________ N.RAVI SHANKAR,J rkk Dated: 24-11-2011