IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15647 of 2011 SURENDRA SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 19.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 420, 406, 323 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioner is that he received Rs. 4,00,000/- and odd for providing employment, whereas, it is alleged that Rs. 1,00,000/- has been deposited in the account of the petitioner. The account number of the petitioner has not been mentioned in the F.I.R. The informant himself admitted that for Rs. 4,00,000/- and odd, the receipt was given by one Prakash Pandey which was given to the informant by this petitioner. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that prior to the lodging of the present case, the petitioner's side lodged the case against the 2 informant. It is further submitted that during the investigation, the accusation was found false. Considering the fact that that the informant himself admits about the receiving of the receipt under the signature of Prakash Pandey, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Koilwar P.S. Case No. 34/2011, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)