t•rv PEiniOI^ER RESPQN^^T ,^^- rf»>~ ..•••• 0»CHHAlTISGARH.BILASPBRrC.G.) Sird:. Sfayama Chattegee aged 40 years WbLafeSlinR.K.CfaatterjeeA-32 Pnyadarshani'Nagai^Bilaspur dQ. VERSUS ^^^s^ 1. State ofChfaattisgfflli Through CUefSecretaiy DepartnieQt QfEIe(;teical/MectMmcalii®avy Machmai'y Diyision, In-igation Deptt. RaqwC.G. 1 2. Executive Engineei, Electrieal/Meeh- tfical, Heavy luactuBaiy divffiKMi fcrig. Deptt. CADA Buildmgnear Cpnanis sioaeF office Bilaspur C'.CT. 3. CdleGtoE.BiIaspurDistttCtBitepur 4. StateofNaiffityai%a(^st^til Bi3^ii CNefSeta'etaFKE/Mtiga^^l^GMBjei^ DivisiQnIm^.tiQBdepU;. VaBffiffit :l::BhavaH|ith0ptfMR.:i;:,i i • 'i^V^ !| ;;:' l]fflieB(j lE|ffla,^^ Sl sot^'^EraBHi^iE>BbIi^:|^|e|r9|l<J^^: tds^NayakBbawanKIia&i et New:I3eHM.. i: :: • • • ' ;ii i: ]•' ffln (tflndia. B Bi B K E^ -i,Ea (B '.il.IN i iViA ;N iiin 113 li.^t ^- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIIA8PUR 8INGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHM SATISH K. AGNmOTRI. J. WMT PETITION N0.3632 OF2004 Petitioner versus Respondents Smt. Shyama Chatterjee State ofChhattisgarh and others Present : Mr. Rajeev Bfaarat, counsel forthe petitioner. Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Dq?uty Goverament Advoeate for resporidents No.l, 2 and 3. Mrs. B.M.Maity, Advocate appears on behalfofMr.S.K. Beriwal, leamed counsel fbr respondent No.5/Uiuon ofindia. None appears for respondent No.4/State ofMadhya Pradesh. ORALORDER (Passed on31a ofJuly, 2006) The husband of the petitioner, namely, Shri R.K.Chatterjee, while working as Sub-Divisional Officer in Heavy Engineering Irrigation Department, Darri Korba, District Korba, died on 11-11-1997 in hamess. The pfititioner, being dependent legal heir of the deceased, filed an application in March, 1998 for her appointment on compassionate basjs on the post ofClerk Grade-III. After creation ofState ofChhattisgarhl tiie ] petitioner again made an application for compassionate appointmenf. iThe l!iUil ] i i • i 11 i 3 -r Eii| i't W! \t —z applicatkm ofthe petitioiier was rejected oa the ground 1faat therewas no vacancy available. Be-that as it may, the GovemmentofChhattisgar}:t,byits cireular dated 2-2-2006, has taken a decision to considsr cases of?all the dependents/legal heirsof the deceased - employees, who diedafier 1-11- 1997, for compassioaate appointment. :i'[ll N »8 2. In view of the decision of the State Govemment, this writ petition is disposed ofwith liberty to the petitioner to make a represeirtation to the respondents/State for consideration of her case foi compassionate appointment and if such a representation is made, the State Govemtnent is directed to consider the case ofthe petitioneraccording t6 its own Circular dated2-2-2006 and also in view ofthe order dated 20-12-2005 passedlby this Court inWritPetitionNo. 1322/2002 and other conaected matters, onlrts own merit, inaccordancewithlaw. No order astocosts. 11 CertiiSed copy as per niles. SairisV^"st^* •w t!i