IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 7420 of 2008 Decided on: 06.09.2010 Jagdish Chand and others …Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioners. : Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : In sequel to order dated 26.05.2010, supplementary affidavit has been filed on 31.08.2010. Para-5 of the supplementary affidavit reads thus: “ That pursuant to the order of Hon'ble Apex Court, the Govt. vide notification No. Cha(2)44/92-Shiksha-Kha-Vol- II dated 29th October, 1993 had notified the pay scale (grades) and petitioners were promoted to class-II. Further action in the matter was to be taken by the Director of Education. After examining the record/service books of some of the petitioners, it transpires that the pay of the petitioners have not been revised /fixed by the Director of Education as yet. Now the Director, Higher Education vide letter No. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No -2- EDN(D)-1-1394/08 dated 28.8.2010 has been instructed to check up their pay scales (Pension) at the time of retirement and ensure their grades (pay scales) are fixed in terms of order of Hon'ble Apex Court and notification dated 29.10.93 issued in pursuance to the order ibid within one month. (The copy of the same is annexed as Annexure R-1).” 2. Consequently, in view of the contents of this para, respondent- State is directed to take a final decision with regard to the fixation of pay within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioners. In case, the petitioners are found suitable, they shall be entitled to all the consequential benefits. 3. In view of the above observations/directions, the petition stands disposed of. No costs. Copy dasti. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge September 6, 2010 (K. Attri)