IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10444 of 2009 1. NAMILAL RAI @ NAMILAL YADAV, son of late Kamal Yadav 2. Shiv Dayal Yadav, son of late Kamal Yadav, both resident of village Roshanpur Sapaha, P.S. Sugali, district East Champaran Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03/ 23.06.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, the State and the complainant. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with a complaint case registered for the offence under Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code. They are named in the complaint, but it is said that they are only responsible in hiding the daughter of the complainant. Counsel for the petitioners submits that aforesaid allegation is absolutely false, as the daughter of the complainant voluntarily eloped with Sattan Yadav and thereafter applied for registration of her marriage with Sattan Yadav and petitioners are in no way connected with Sattan Yadav. Counsel for the complainant, however, submitted that petitioner Shiv Dayal Yadav is the brother-in-law of Sattan Yadav. Let the petitioners above named surrender in the court of C.J.M., East Champaran in connection with Complaint Case No. 888 of 2006 (Arising out of Trial No. 855 of 2008) within four weeks from today and apply for regular bail, which should be considered in the light of the allegation set out in the 2 complaint and if the court below is satisfied that the petitioners are not directly responsible for the elopement of the daughter of the complainant with Sattan Yadav, then appropriate orders be passed. Let this order be communicated to the court below through fax on payment of usual charges by the petitioners. Arjun/ ( V.N. Sinha, J.)