@ HIGH c¢uRT oF cHHATTlseARH AT aILASPUR H w. ms) No. 422? of gm Narendra Kumar Sahu S/o. Shri Kanhaiya Lal Sahu; Aged about -— 38 years, By Caste -— Sahu *(O.B.C.),' R/o.-Village Birkona, Tahsi! & Distt. Bilaspur; (C.G.) Versus Petitioner Chairman, Coal IndiavLimitedv 10 Nemji Subhash Rga‘ad, 'KoEkaté ‘(W.B.) Director (P. & lR.), Ceal lndia Ltd“ ,10, Netaji Subhash Road, Kolkota (W.B.)r 3. Member Secretary, JBCC-Vl Joint Bipartite Committee for The Coal Industry), Coal India Ltd. 10, Netaji Subhash Road. Koikota (W.B.) rChairman-cum‘Managing Director, S.E.C.L. Head Qtr. Seepat Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) . Chief General Manager, Korba Area. Distt.-Korba. (C.G.) Respondents (w 3. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE 6ONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri) Shri Rahul Mishra Advocate for the petitioner Shri Praveen DasJAdvocate for the re'sponde’rrts. r r R D E R (Passed on this'20 day of Jufy, 2007) ' Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is similarly situated to that of the respondents in the matter of Chairman. Central Coalfields Ltd. & others Vs. Jivendra Prasad Tiwari &rothers (Civil Appeal No. 1714 of 2007). Learned counsel further submits that the said Civil Appeal has been disposed of vide order dated 29‘" March, 2007, passed by the Hon’ble. Supreme Court of lndia. Learned counsel further submits that this case may also be disposed of in the same terms, which the leamed counsel appearing for the respondents/$.E.C.L. does not controvert. 2. ln view of the above, the petition Stands disposed of in the same terms. e‘ l Sd/— Satish K.Agnihotri r Judge 1 ' l l ‘ No order as to costs. B!- seae‘A ee L