IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3272 of 2002 Date of decision: 2nd September, 2009 Kartar Singh and others … Petitioners Versus Imrat and others … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Harsh Nain, Advocate for Mr. Sunil Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Manoj Tanwar, Advocate for Mr. N.S. Shekhawat, Advocate for the respondents. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Plaintiff petitioners filed a suit for permanent injunction. The trial Court held that the remedy is open to the plaintiffs to file a suit for partition but not suit for an injunction restraining the co-owner in possession and therefore, the ad-interim injunction was refused. The plaintiffs, thereafter, filed an appeal. They also failed in the appeal. As a result thereof, present revision petition was filed. On July 11, 2002, a coordinate Bendh of this Court passed the following order: “Heard. A perusal of the Jamabandi, shown at the time of arguments, clearly indicates that Mushtarka Malkan are shown in possession of the property in dispute. It is not in exclusive possession of the respondents. Admitted. Civil Revision No. 3272 of 2002 Parties are directed to maintain status-quo till further orders. Efforts on the part of the trial Court to expedite the trial will highly be appreciated.” Mr. Harsh Nain appearing for the petitioners and Mr.Manoj Tanwar appearing for the respondents are unable to acquaint this Court regarding the outcome of the suit. Since July 11, 2002, the parties are maintaining status-quo. In case, the suit has not been decided, the parties shall continue to maintain status-quo till the suit is finally decided. With these observations, present revision petition is disposed of. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE September 2, 2009 rps 2