IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1137 OF 2009 Ram Rahim Co-op. Housing Society (Proposed) & 2 Ors. ...Petitioners. v. State of Maharashtra & 3 Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. Ajay Misar i/by Ajay Misar & Co. adv. For the Petitioners. Ms.Smita Gaidhani, AGP For the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.G.W.Matos, AGP for the Respondent No.3. Mr.Jitendra Jain with Ms.Bharati Gaud, advs. for the Respondent No.4. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : 10th February , 2010. P.C. 1 Heard Parties. 2 Petitioners were residing in the building, which has been acquired for development earlier under DCR-33(9). It appears that the work of re-development can not be carried out considering the smallness of the plot. On behalf of the MHADA, the learned counsel points out that there is a proposal for amending DCR No.33(7) whereby such buildings can also be got developed. 3 Considering the above, in our opinion, petition is premature. However, the respondent/State considering the grievance of the - 2 - petitioners that they are compelled to stay in transit accommodation to take decision as early as possible. 4 With the above observations, petition stands disposed off. (J.H. BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)