PETETTONER: HieH COURT OF CHHATTIS^RH. BZLASPUR Writ Petition (227) No.6938 of 2009 Ashok Kumar Ahuja S/o Late Tehakandas Ahuja, aged about 45 years, R/o Mainroad Naya Sarkanda, Bilaspur, bistt Bilaspur (C,<5,) RESPON&ENTS: Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through District Collector, Bitaspur (C,<5.) 2. The Tahsildar, Bibspur, Distt. BiSaspur (Writ petition under Articie 227 of the Gonstitution of India} Present: Mr* Sunii Gtwani, counse! for the petitioner, Miss Sangeeta Mishra, Pane! Lawyer for the State/respondents, Sinel®Bench: Hon'bi®Mr. T.P. Sharma. J ORALGRDER (26-11-2009) 1. This petition under Articie 227 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of a wrlt in the nature of mandGmus against the authorities/Tahslidar, Biiaspur for deciding the mutation proceeding pending before it in Revenue Case No.237/A-6/08-09 which is pending since 11-6-2008 and according to the petitioner, no further date has been given after 2-3-2009, 2. I have heard learned counsei for the parties, perused the petition, copies of order sheets and other documents, 3. On perusai of the copies of order sheets and other docu?nents, it appears that the authority concerned/Tahsildar, Bilaspur has faiied in his duty in deciding the ex parte proceeding pending before it and has failed to exercise the jurisdiction vested on it, In order to secure the ends of justice, respondent No,2 is directed to decide the mutation proceeding pending in Revenue Case No.237/A-6/08-09 expeditiously. 4. The petition Stands disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. S(V- TP.Sharma Judge