IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9312 of 2007 SANGEETA KUMARI W/O Sri Ranjit Kumar Singh resident of village Bihat, Tola Maswandpur, P.S. Barauni, District Begusrai. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.The Collector, Begusrai. 3.The Block Development Officer, Barauni, District Begusrai. 4.The ChildDevelopment Project Officer, Barauni, District Begusrai. 5.Smt. Meena Kumari W/O Jaishankar Singh resident of village Bihat, Tola Masnadpur, P.S. Barauni, District Begusrai. ----------- 2 27/11/2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. Prayer of the petitioner in this writ application reads as follows:- “That this application is for issuance of the appropriate writ/orders/direction to the respondent no. 2 to 4 to enquire and consider afresh the illegal and irregular appointment of the respondent no.5 for the post of Anganbari Sevika for the Bihat Panchayat who is unable due to her old age but by suppressing and manipulating her certificate of age she has been appointed even after the protest in the meeting as well as by the representation with affidavit and for direction to appoint the petitioner in place of the respondent no.5 after cancellation of her appointment.” As with regard to the aforementioned prayer counsel for the petitioner would also draw attention towards paragraph 6 of the writ application which reads as follows:- “That the petitioner subsequently complained to the respondent no.4 (B.D.O. 2 Barauni) on 22.3.07 and by registered post another representation filed on 9.4.07 to the respondent no.2 (Collector) and on 12.4.07 the petitioner has been enquired in the Prakhand office but instead of it, she has joined for the post of Anganbari Sevika and is still working.” In view of the fact that the petitioner claims to have filed some representation on 9.4.2007 by registered post, if the petitioner would produce such proof of sending the representation by registered post before the Collector of the district along with a copy of this order and if the Collector finds the same to be correct and representation filed by the petitioner on 9.4.2007 to be still pending, he would pass an appropriate reasoned order within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, of course, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, respondent no.5 as also the representative of the concerned Gram panchayat. With the aforementioned observation/direction this application is disposed of. Abhay Kumar (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)