Civil Writ Petition No.15219 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.15219 of 2009 Decided on : 07-10-2009 Ravinder Kumar .... Petitioner VERSUS Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Panipat & another .... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL. Present:- Mr. R.S. Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.K. Mutneja, Advocate, for the caveator/respondents. SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J (Oral). The petitioner has filed the instant petition for quashing order dated 4.3.2009 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Estate Officer, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Panipat (respondent No.2 herein), whereby he has been ordered to be evicted from Room No.326, Staff Hostel, Refinery Township, Panipat, in exercise of power under Sub Section (1) of Section 5 (B) of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971, and against the order dated 31.8.2009 (Annexure P-5) passed by the Additional District Judge, Panipat, vide which his appeal against the above- said order was also dismissed. Civil Writ Petition No.15219 of 2009 -2- After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition. However, he prays that the petitioner may be allowed to retain the said house till 31.01.2010, subject to filing of undertaking by him that he will hand over the vacant possession of the said premises to the respondents on or before 31.01.2010. Counsel for the caveator/respondents has no objection for retaining the house by the petitioner for the said period, subject to his furnishing requisite undertaking before the Estate Officer. In view of above, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioner is granted permission to retain the aforesaid accommodation till 31.01.2010, subject to his furnishing requisite undertaking before the Estate Officer (respondent No.2) for handing over the vacant possession of the said premises to the respondents on or before 31.01.2010, within a period of three weeks from today. If the said undertaking is not furnished within the stipulated period, the respondents will be at liberty to execute/implement the impugned orders. 7th October, 2009. (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) Monika JUDGE