18 THE RISH COOKT O? J8DICAT8KS &T J&BAfcPTO W8IT PSTITI08 80 ^ ^Aa/1999. (WSIT PSITION OBDSS &STICLE 226/227 Og THS C08STITOTION OF I8DIA) PSTITI08S8: 1; Oaad Bfaat S/o Late Shrx Suleaaan Bhai aged atoout 48 years > S/o Byron Bazar , Baipur (B.P.) vm ESPOHfiSNTS: 2. Pradeep Kixffiar Gupta S/o late Sfcri Mahendra Pal Supta aged aboat 50 years, B/o Slianti Nagar, fiaipur (M.P.) //Versus// t 1. Baipar De^elopi&enl, itothority, & body incorporat»ed under Sec'fcion- 38 o-E Sagar Ta-tha Gram Nlvesii Adliinxyaia, faaving its ^ office a'fc <3.S. &oad, fialpur (B.P.). t^» 2. The Cfaairaan., / Saipur Developi&ent Authori-ty/ Saipur (K.P.). ..-^ 3. Tahslldar (BecoveryOfjEicer), Baipur De^eiopiaerit &uthorit»y, Saipux (M[.P.) Sfiil. PETITION SffiEES. &BTICLS 226/227 OrTHE CQ8STITOTI08 OF INDIA llv. ^^M^^^^^_ HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURB CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Siai^le Bench: Hon^ble Shri Satish K. JS^gnihotri, J. W. P. No. 1820 of 1999 Petitioners Respondeuts Daud Bhai & anofher Versus Raipur Developnient Aufhonty aad two ofhers. Shri Goutam Bhaduri, counsel for titie petitioners. Shri B.P. Sharma, counsel for respondents No. 1 aad 2. Suit. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Goveninient Advocate for fhe respondent No.3. ORAL ORDER (12h May, 2006) 1. I.A. No. 5008/2006, fhis is an appUcation for wifhdrawal of fhe writ petition. Learaed counsel appearing for fhe rcspondents have no objection, if fhe appUcation is aUowed. 2. In view of fhe averments niade ia flie appUcation, fhe application is ordercd, as prayed for. 2» Consequentiy, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. 7 Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge c.^^^