IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S). N0. <^ ^84/2006 PETITIONER ^AIakhram Tandiya .^.S/o Shri Pardeshi Ram Tandiya V^-A^ ..• . : . . . ^••^g,?' ...-•"' Age about 44 years, C**\'N.' .A°~ .<.'•"' Village- Pateva, Post-Pateva, i^ •^ .^€ ^^ ^.^ <^.. y RESPONDENT ^6^ ^s^^> ^ I..frcu •*f-i.-4 ^ w Tahsil-Nayapara Rajim, Block-Abhanpur Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS /-1. StateGovt.ofChhattisgarh Through Secretary Educational Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Drictt.-Raipur(C.G.) '2. DistrictEducationOfficer Raipur, District-Raipur(C.G.) Block Education Officer Abhanpur District-Raipur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 3??^irai5FT, WTfltf'ie, Rlflwy 3TI^?I M?|ch irwti a'i'ii'h— .ljt.)...P:./^6..1$.'.^^ fg; .UU...V;.'..V...-.-.•..-,„[. wj; / 2<n» Rlfcaft sn^rqiT R-ii* sn^r shiro (ri?(T 'v ^. 3f1^T <«TIItl<WVW flfe 14/11/2006 Shri Ajay Shrivastava, couns^l Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govt|. Heard. Petitioner claiming himself| increments for passing B.T.!.exam| cireular dated 24/12/1998 and the j|iid! Petition No.3977/2003 dated 03/04^: for a direction by this Court to grant Petitioner has not approachejj exhausting his departmental rem^y Court. Petitioner is directed to concerned authority i,e., respondenf in turn, shail examine the same anp with !aw within thiriy days thereafter). With the aforesaid directionsl, iiberty to file afresh in case an for the petitioner. Advocate forthe respondents/State. to be entitled for two advanced Ination at his own cost on the basis of j|iidgment passed by this Court in Writ |f2006, has preferred this writ petition two advanced increments to him. the concerned authority and without he has directly approached this <fititci4)-i WRff ff teA <R|(&]< ^isri^tTsn^T Inake a representatipn before the (s No. 2 and 3 withinthiriy days, who pass suitable orders in accordance this writ petition is disposed of with^ everjtuality arises. V.K.Shrivastava Judge ((ft^y^)