1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1252/2005 GHANSHYAM LAL VS AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD & ORS DATE OF ORDER: 11.3.2005 HON’BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.Manish Pitalia, for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the demand notice was issued to the petitioner on 7th July, 2003 raising a demand of more than Rs. 70,000/-. The petitioner challenged the said demand by filing a complaint before the District Consumer Forum, Chittorgarh, which was dismissed by the District Consumer Forum on the ground that no complaint can be entertained in commercial matters. The petitioner is, therefore, preferred this writ petition to challenge the impugned order. Looking to the disputed questions of facts involved in the matter, it will be just and proper for the petitioner to approach the authorities concerned under the conditions framed by the electricity supply 2 companies under the provisions of the Indian Electricity Act. Hence, do not find any merit in this writ petition. Therefore, the writ petition of the petitioner is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-