IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42067 of 2009 1. LAXMAN RAI @ LAXMAN SINGH 2. Jitendra Kumar Rai Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 15.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that due to previous enmity, petitioners have been named at the later stage of incident otherwise basically what appeared in the F.I.R. is that two unknown criminals resorted firing resulting into death of the informant’s brother. Even then petitioners are apprehending their arrest which is not justified. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Sikahatta P.S. Case No. 40 of 2009, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Bhojpur at Ara subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)