IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL NO : 547 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 03/07/2007 in WP NO : 3987 OF 2000 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 T.K.Veeraiah (died Per LRs), T.V.Dharmapal S/o.Late T.K.Veeraiah R/op.Bolaram, R.R.District 2 T.V.yashpal S/o.Late T.K.Veeraiah R/o.Kamalanagar, Keesara Mandal R.R.District ..... APPELLANTS AND 1 The Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad 2 The Revenue Divisonal officer, Chevella Divison at Hyderabad R.R.District 3 The M.R.O., Malkajgiri Mandal Ranga Reddy District 4 K.Krishna Reddy S/o.Narayana Reddy r/o.H.No.1-2 Near Seven Temple Area, Alwal Municipality Machabolaram, R.R.District 5 K.Muthyam Reddy S/o.Veera REddy r/o.H.No.1-2 Near Seven Temple Area, Alwal Municipality Machabolaram, R.R.District 6 K.Chandra Reddy S/o.K.Veera Reddy r/o.H.No.1-2 Near Seven Temple Area, Alwal Municipality Machabolaram, R.R.District .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellants:MR.B.SUDHAKAR REDDY & NEERAJA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL No:547 OF 2008 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) The present writ appeal is filed against the order of the learned single judge passed in W.P.No: 3187 of 2000 on 3.7.2007. Heard the learned counsel. A perusal of the order impugned goes to show that the writ petition has been considered to be allowed since no counter has been filed. At this stage, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant undertakes to file the counter, within a period of two weeks from today. In view of the submission of the learned counsel, We feel that the lis in question has to be adjudicated on its own merits, but not on mere technicalities, in order to avoid multiplicity of proceedings of this nature. Therefore, We feel it a fit case wherein the matter can be remanded back for fresh disposal. Accordingly, this writ appeal is allowed remanding the matter to the appropriate Court for fresh disposal. _______________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari ____________________________ Justice Ramesh Ranganathan Date: 17th June, 2008 Nn/Gurc. THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL NO : 547 of 2008 (Judgment delivered by the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) 17.6.2008