IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3465 of 2010 1. ANTO KUMAR MISTRY 2. SANTOSH KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------ 02. 29.01.2010 Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted under sections 304(B)/328/201/34 IPC. The victim was done to death in the matrimonial home within seven years of her marriage. The petitioners are in-laws (Devars). There is allegation of demand of dowry followed by torture at the hands of the husband and other in-laws. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the informant as well as other family members of the deceased had participated in cremation. It is next contended that the petitioners are Devars and allegations are general and omnibus. Be that as it may, having regard to the allegations contained in the FIR, this Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory. Let the petitioners surrender in the court below and apply for regular bail which shall be considered on its own merit uninfluenced by the present order. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )