mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10456 OF 2009 Parshuram S. Shivsharan Petitioner versus Kalaniketan Sahakari Griha Rachana Sanstha Maryadit and others Respondents Amogh Parlikar for petitioner. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 15th February 2010 PC :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is a third party obstructionist. The Executing Court is holding an inquiry in accordance with Rule 97 of Order XXI of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The prayer made before the Trial Court for permitting re- examination of the petitioner has been rejected by the impugned order. The impugned order is capable of being challenged in the proceedings which may be filed by the petitioner for challenging the final order passed under Rule 97 read with Rule 103 of Order XXI of the said Code of 1908. At this stage, challenge to the impugned order cannot be entertained. Subject to what is observed above, the writ petition is not entertained and the same is rejected. (A.S.OKA, J.)