IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 10TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 19TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 25580 of 2008(T) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ MOHAMMED.M.M., MALAIKUDY HOUSE, EDATHALA. BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERENAKULAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.R. SREELATHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.25580/2008 T APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE TIME SCHEDULE ISSUED ON 4/10/2006. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 4/4/2008. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss V.GIRI, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C).No.25580 of 2008 ------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of November, 2008. JUDGMENT The petitioner, who is an operator, operating on the basis of a regular permit on the route Aluva-Kaloor, has sought for revision of Ext.P1 timings, which was settled on 4.10.2006. 2. I heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader. 3. The respondent should first consider whether the petitioner has made out a case under Section 212 of the Motor Vehicles Act, read with Rule 145(7) of the Rules, seeking revision of timings. If the respondent finds that the petitioner has made out a case, then the request may be considered in a timing conference and after hearing the objections, a decision may be taken. This process shall be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (V.GIRI) JUDGE sk/ //true copy//