IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.34633 -M of 2009 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : AUGUST 4, 2011 SANJEEV KUMAR & ANR. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. VK Kataria, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl.AG, Punjab. Mr. HS Deol, Advocate, for respondent No.2. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 Learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw the petition to enable the petitioners to take all the pleas taken in this petition during the course of trial. 2 Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 3 Before parting with the order, however, considering the relationship of the petitioners viz. that of brother-in-law and sister-in-law of Poonam, respectively, personal appearance of the petitioners before the trial Court shall remain exempted on the following conditions:- i) they shall be represented by a counsel before the trial court; ii)they shall not dispute their identity as accused; Criminal Misc. No.34633 -M of 2009 (O&M) 2 iii)they shall have no objection if the evidence is recorded in their absence; iv)they shall come present before the trial court as and when required; and v)they shall comply with any other condition(s) that may be imposed by the trial court. August 4, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?