36 # % 14.12.2010 Present: Mr. S.R. Mahla, Adv. for the petitioners along with petitioner no. 1 in person. Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State along with ASI Jaggu Ram, P.S. Rohini. Mr. .Vijay Kumar Sharma, Adv. for respondentno.2 along with respondent no. 2 in person. + Crl. M.A. 18510/2010 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. + Crl. M.C. 3873/2010 Petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 were married sometimein the year 2007. On accountof temperamentaldifferencesthey could hardly live together for eight/nine months. On the complaint of respondentno. 2, FIR in questionwas registeredagainstpetitionerno. 1 and his relativesi.e. petitionernos. 2 to 10 at Police StationRohini (South) on 13th December, 2007. Petitionerand respondentno. 2 have settled their dispute amicablybefore the MediationCell, Rohini Courts. Terms of settlement have been recorded in the proceeding sheet dated 6^ October, 2009 of Mediation Cell (Annexure P2 at page nos. 71 to 74). Parties shall be bound by the terms of settlement. Petitionerno. 1 and respondentno. 2 have decidedto part ways. They Signing Date:03.08.2024 17:21:43 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified have obtained decree of divorce by way of mutual consent from the Family Court, Rohini on 6^^ July, 20l0. In terms of the settlement remainingsettledamountof ^40,000/-in the shape of FDR in favour of minor child Rishita has been handed over to respondent no. 2 by petitionerno. 1in Court today. Photocopyof the said FDR is placed on record. Respondentno.2 states that she has no objectionif the FIR is quashed. Since both the parties have decided to part ways and, in fact, have obtaineddecree ofdivorce by way ofmutual consent,no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping criminal case pending. Accordingly, in larger interest, FIR No. 1167/2007 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC registered at Rohini (South) and consequent proceedingsemanatingtherefromare quashed. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti. PATHAK, J. DECEMBER 14, 2010 ga