IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH L.P.A. No. 1581 of 2011 Date of Decision: 01.09.2011 Rajbir Singh ........Appellant vs. State of Punjab and others .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present: Mr. Saravpreet Gurna, Advocate for the appellant 1. To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? M.M. Kumar, J. Learned Single Judge has come to the conclusion that the appellant was working as Gram Rozgar Sewak on contract basis and the contract was to continue upto October 2010 which could have been extended further. Accordingly, it was extended upto May, 2011 and no extension thereafter was given. The grievance of the appellant before learned Single Judge was that there are other persons whose contract has been extended. However, learned Single Judge has recorded that once the term of contract has expired no mandamus could be issued because there is no right with the appellant in view of terms and conditions of appointment letter. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant, we are of the view that the opinion expressed by learned Single Judge does L.P.A. No. 1581 of 2011 2 not suffer from any illegal infirmity and warrant interference of this Court. Dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (GURDEV SINGH) 01.09.2011 JUDGE reena