IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2914 of 2009 VISHNU DEO DAS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ----------- 5. 04.05.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. Learned Counsel for the petitioner very fairly acknowledges that the opposite parties have revoked the suspension from due date but seeks to raise a grievance with regard to quantum of salary paid in context of 6th Pay Revision Committee Report. He further submits that certain further actions have been taken which are proposed to be challenged in writ petition. In absence of any direction in the writ petition for payment of any specific amount on a specified scale, the Court finds it difficult to proceed any further in contempt jurisdiction as those are matters which can be agitated in a fresh writ application only. The contempt application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)