1 wp3267-11.doc ttm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3267 OF 2011 Nashik Workers Union .. Petitioners Vs. Rajoo Engineers Limited and Anr. .. Respondents Mr.Bhavesh Parmar i/b Ms.Sandhya A. Mailagir and Mr.Devmani Shukla for the petitioner Mr.V.P. Vaidya for respondent nos.1 and 2 CORAM: K.K. TATED, J. DATE: 6th MAY, 2011 PC: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. By this petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner original complainant Union challenges the order dt.31.3.11 passed by the Industrial Court, Nasik below Exh.U-2 in complaint (ULP) No.84 of 2011 rejecting the petitioner s application for ’ following reliefs : 2 wp3267-11.doc (a) Till final disposal of this complaint, restrain the respondents from implementing the transfer letters dated 23.03.2011 issued to workmen whose names are stated in Annexure F to this complaint. (b) Restrain the respondents from shifting the plant and machinery, tools and equipments, raw material or any other goods or material of respondent from Nashik to Rajkot, Gujrat. (c) Respondents be directed to implement Memorandum of Understanding dated 25.08.2010. (d) other just and proper orders be granted in favour of union and workmen as against the respondent company.” 3. By consent, writ petition is disposed of on following terms: a) The learned counsel for respondent nos.1 and 2 makes a statement that as stated in the affidavit in reply of Mr.Ravi Sundaram, Manager of respondent company dt.30.3.11 filed before the Industrial Court, Nasik in Complaint (ULP) No.84 of 2011 in para 13, they will not shift plant and machinery mentioned from Nasik and will not create any third party right, title and interest in respect of plot no.25/2/2, Road-C, MIDC Satpur, Dist. Nasik till the hearing and final disposal of the complaint (ULP) No.84 of 2011. (b) Statement of the learned counsel for respondent nos.1 and 2 is accepted. 3 wp3267-11.doc (c) Hearing of complaint (ULP) No.84 of 2011 is expedited. The Industrial Court is requested to dispose of the same, in any case within 9 months from today. (K.K.TATED,J.)