IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.3307 of 2011 Date of decision : 3.10.2011 Sri Chand ....Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present: Mr.Ravi Partap Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Sunil Nehra, Sr.DAG, Haryana for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr.H.N.Mehtani, Advocate for respondent No.3. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3 contends that the controversy raised in the instant petition is squarely covered by the judgment dated 15.9.2011 passed in CWP No.3280 of 2011 (Rajesh Shekhu v. State of Haryana and others). He further states that this matter deserves to be disposed of in view of the said judgment and the petitioner would be entitled as eligible in the backward class category candidates in the Lecturers (School Cadre). Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the ratio of the aforesaid judgment. 3.10.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss