THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY WRIT PETITION No : 17819 of 2005 Dated: 12-08-2005 Between: D.Khaja S/o Late Khasim Saheb, Aged about 18 years, R/o. D.No.5/303, Nagulabavi Street, Gooty, Anantapur District. … Petitioner AND The A.P.S.R.T.C. represented By its Regional Manager, Anantapur, Anantapur District and others. … Respondents ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioner aggrieved by the inaction of the respondents in providing employment to the petitioner under the ‘Bread Winner Scheme’. According to the petitioner, his father Khasim Saheb was working as Conductor under the respondent Corporation and died on 26-09-2004 while in service. The petitioner’s mother made an application on 23-02-2005 to the 3rd respondent – Depot Manager, seeking appointment to the petitioner under the ‘Bread Winner Scheme’ in any of the suitable post, as the petitioner studied up to Intermediate and he has crossed 18 years. But, no orders have been passed thereon. Therefore, the petitioner has come up with the present writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Standing Counsel for the Corporation and considered the material available on record. Admittedly, the petitioner’s father had worked under the respondent Corporation and died while in service on 26-09-2004. Therefore, in terms of the circulars of the Corporation, the dependants of the deceased employee of the Corporation are entitled for appointment, if the members of the family are in indigent circumstances. It is the case of the petitioner that none of the members of his family are employed. Therefore, the petitioner’s mother made an application dated 23-02-2005 seeking appointment to the petitioner in any of the suitable post under the respondent Corporation. The grievance of the petitioner is that the 3rd respondent, to whom they addressed the representation, did not consider the same and pass orders and therefore, he sought for appropriate orders. In the above circumstances, as the representation dated 23-02-2005, made by the petitioner’s mother, seeking appointment is pending, it is appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the 3rd respondent to pass appropriate orders on the representation dated 23-02-2005, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. ___________________ S. ANANDA REDDY, J Dated: 12-08-2005 LSK