o Sinsle Bsi-.&fe IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. zl-i83 72004 PETITIONER Shiv Kumar Sahu, aged ab out 27 years, son of Late Shri Yogesh Ram Sahu, resident of Sinchayee colony, Rampur, Djstt. Korba (C.G.) V E R S_U S RESPONDENTS ^:-^:. 10 \<""^-"°\ 7J--''<'^..>"'/, -<^°' ^""t->-y""'^0^ •C-t' .-'tH y^.^ » / .. ^,t;n ^SSr^ -< 0°' ^C^Q^ yv"' The State of Chhattisgarh, through : the Secretary, Department General & Administration, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Mantralay, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) . 2. The State of Chhattisgarh through : Secretary, Department of Water Resources, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) The State of Madhya Pradesh, through : the Secretary, Deptt of General and Administration, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (MP) The Union of India, through : the Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pension (State Reorganization Cell), III Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi. The Executive Engineer, Department of Water Resources, Hasdeo Barrage, R.B.C., Rampur, Distt. Korba (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FO_R_ISSUANCE OF WRIT / WRITS, DIRECTION / DIRECTIONS; ORDER / ORDERS IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS -RRQ:KIBITION ETC. y <;'>t^.:';PAfelCULARS ABOUT THE PETITIONER:- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petitiou No. 4189 of 2004 Petitioner Respondents Versus Shiv Kumar Sahii State of Chhattisgarh & otheia 8B: Hontsle Mr, Justice Sattsh K. Agaihotri, J Shri Viaay Paadey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri. I.N. Shrivastava, Panel law}rer for the respondents No. 1, 2 and 5. None for the respondents No. 3 and 4. •7 !as ORAL ORDER ( 27thJune, 2006) Learaed counsel for fhe petitioner subinits fhat the petitioner is the son of Shri Yogesh Rani Sahu, who was working as Assistant Fitter in fhe office of the. i^spondent No. 5,/Executive E.ngiiieer, Mini Ma.ta Bango Canal, Division No. 6, Rampur, Korba. Shri Yogesh Ram. Saliu died in ba-mess on 10.2. 1999. The petitioner, being one of the dependant-legal heirs of the deceased filed aii application thereafter for coinpassionate appoiatnient the Executive Engineer/respondent No. 5. The said appUcation not considered on fhe ground that fl-ie death has occurred creatiou of new State of Chhattisgarh. 3. The State Goveminent is directed to consider fhe case ofthe petitioner as per its own cu-cular dated 2.2.2006 arid also in view of the oi-der dated 20.12.2005 passed by this Court m W.P. No. 1322/2002 and ofher connected m.atters on its own raerit, iii accoidaiice with law, on siich represeatation beiag filed by the petitioner. 4. For the i"asons stated-above, the writ petitiou stands disposed of. No order as to costs. -— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge