^ ^ !N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH SINGLE BENGH W.P.(S) No. / 2011 PETITIONER Smt. Linu Tuli W/o Shri Gurmeet Singh Tuli, Aged about 45 years, Occupation - Lecturer, Govt. Higher Secondary School Balod Distt. Durg (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS '.••<nQ^\...- s^- 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Se'cretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur ^(C.G.) 3. District Education Officer District Durg (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1 'is^- J^ w. RPNf^H ' MON?SRI.^ iSHRI ppl fanB^^^I I 3 3 S^^I'S fc^tesflui ^fcffB 13^3 ft ^^? W.P.iSi No.525 of 2011 Srnt. Linu Tuli. Verss State of Chhattisgarh and others. e? l^s^a ^M" Appearancs: Shri Vipin Tiwari, counsel for petitioner. Shrl Yashwant Sinah, Deputy Advoc ite General for the State. 31/0' Following oral order of the Court was passed by Mlshra. J. 'raR (2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to benefit of two advance increments on account of she having passed B.Ed. examination before her appolntment at her own cost. It is submitted that the invo!ved In the present petition Is no longer res- and the same has finally declded by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case oi Asha Saxena vs. State of M.P. & Ors., reported in (II!) 59. (3) It is further submitted that this Court has also taken a similar view in Its ora'er dated 06/02/2009 passed tn W.P. (S) No. 6257 or' 2008. .earned counsel for the petitioner further drav/s attention of this C-ourt to order 29/04/2010 passed in Writ Appea! No.124 of 2009, wherein relying upon the judament of the Supreme Court in the case of (supra) and the order passed by this Court in another Writ Appea! No. 87/2009, a'irections have been issued Tor consideration ofthe case for grant of two advance increments as per circular dated 21/09/1974 issued by the of Madhya Pradesh, after verification of the pleaded in the petition. Z-. (4) Learned counse! for the respondents submits that case of the petitioner wouid also be considered on the same lines. (5) in view of the statement made above, this petition is finally disposed off with a direction to the respondent authorities to consider and decide the claim of the DetitiQner for grant of two advance increment as per circuiar dated 21/09/1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification ofthe facts pleaded in the petition within a period ofeight weeks frorn today. __^ Sd//- Prasiiaiit Kumar Mishra Judge