IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.4143 of 2010 1. JAWAHARI DEVI @ JAMAHRI DEVI, W/O RAJ KUMAR PASWAN 2. URMILA DEVI, W/O SHANKAR PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR **** /2/ 16.02.2010 Heard both the sides. 2. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted under Section 366A of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Taking into consideration the fact that the victim in her statement under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code has stated that she left with co-accused, Bhupendra Paswan, voluntarily, since, she loved him, let the petitioners, above named, who are in custody since 16.12.2009 and 15.12.2009 respectively be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (rupees five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Sonbarsa Raj (Kash Nagar O.P.) P.S. Case No. 94 of 2009 to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, on the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of each of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners and (ii) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on 2 the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner then their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. 4. The learned Magistrate is directed to commit the case for trial and the trial Court in seisin of the case will pass appropriate orders whether any offence is made out against the accused persons in view of the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code. S.A. (Anjana Prakash, J.)