IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No.22250 of 2011 Date of decision December 1, 2011 Jaswinder Kaur and another ....... Petitioners Versus The State of Punjab and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Mansur Ali, Advocate for the petitioners. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he will be satisfied if the representation (Annexure P-9) is considered by the Second respondent and take appropriate decision in the light of the judgment of this Court (Annexures P-4). 2. As ordered. 3. Respondent No.2 shall consider the representation and take appropriate decision within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order. 4. The writ petition is disposed of dispensing with notice to the respondents at the stage of admission itself. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE December 1, 2011 archana