1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1275 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1275 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1275 OF 2006 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1218 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1218 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1218 OF 2006 Anis Ahmed Abdul Majeed ..... Applicant Versus Eknath Dagdu Nandre & Anr. ..... Respondents. Mr. M.N. Sandhyanshiv for the Applicant. Mr. U.V. Kejariwala, APP for the Respondents. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. DATE : 8TH DECEMBER 2006 DATE : 8TH DECEMBER 2006 DATE : 8TH DECEMBER 2006 P.C. 1) Heard learned Advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the State. The applicant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 138 of The Electricity Act, 2003. The substantive sentence is simple imprisonment for six months. The fine amount of Rs.5,000/- is already paid by the applicant. 2) Appeal is not likely to be heard before the period substantive sentence is over. 2 3) Application is disposed of by passing following order : i) Applicant shall be enlarged on the same bail on which he was enlarged during the pendency of the trial, subject to filing fresh bail bonds. (A.S. OKA, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.)