WPMS NO.66 of 2007 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. Lok Pal Singh, the learned counsel holding the brief of Mr. Arvind Vashisht, the learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Ashish Joshi, the learned counsel for the respondent no.2 Nagar Nigam, Dehradun. It transpires that the petitioner applied for a “No Objection Certificate” from the Nagar Nigam, Dehradun for the purpose of getting construction map sanctioned from the M.D.D.A. A “No Objection Certificate” was issued by the Nagar Nigam on 12.05.2006. Subsequently, the Nagar Nigam issued an order dated 27.12.2006 revoking the No Objection Certificate. The petitioner, being aggrieved by this order, has filed the present writ petition. In para 11 of the writ petition, it has been stated that the impugned order cancelling the No Objection Certificate was violative of Article 14 of the Constitution and that no reasons were assigned for revoking the No Objection Certificate nor any opportunity of hearing was provided to the petitioner. This allegation has not been denied by the Nagar Nigam in their counter affidavit. Consequently, on the short ground that an opportunity of hearing was not provided to the petitioner before passing the impugned order revoking the N.O.C., the impugned order is quashed and the writ petition is allowed. It would be open to the Nagar Nigam to proceed in accordance with law. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 26.08.2011 LSR