IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 13998 of 2008 Decided on: 3.3.2011 Ashok Kumar …Petitioner Versus The Kangra Cooperative Primary Agriculture & Rural Development Bank Limited, Dharamshala and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : None. For the respondents : Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Case of the petitioner, in a nut-shell, is that though the persons junior to him were considered for promotion, however, his case has not been considered for promotion. In reply, it has come that no person junior to the petitioner has been considered for promotion. 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion with all consequential benefits, as and when his turn comes. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge March 3, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?