- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. CONTINUATION SHEET. CONTINUATION SHEET. CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.389 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.389 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.389 OF 2005 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL FROM ORDER ST.NO.5657 OF 2005 FROM ORDER ST.NO.5657 OF 2005 FROM ORDER ST.NO.5657 OF 2005 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Mr.Parekh i/b Ms Hetal Patel for the Applicant Mr.Anil Singh for the Respondent CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : MARCH 18, 2005. : MARCH 18, 2005. : MARCH 18, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Counsel appearing for the parties. The learned Counsel for the Appellant states that the application was made by the Applicant before the Trial Court praying that the Applicant be ordered to be impleaded as party Defendant. Though the Chamber Summons for the said relief is not decided, the learned Trial Judge has heard the Applicant before passing order on Notice of Motion No.262 of 2005. This factual position is not disputed by the learned Counsel for the Respondent. 2. Accordingly, Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Office is directed to place the Appeal for admission on 28th March 2005. - 2 - JUDGE. JUDGE. JUDGE.