1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 4556 of 2007 Vivek Dinkar Joshi Vs. State of Mah. & Ors. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA & C. L. PANGARKAR JJ. Dated: 29 th July, 2008. Admittedly challenge is made by the petitioner, who is Zilla Parishad employee to the order passed by respondent No.1 State of Maharashtra promoting respondent No.4 to the post of Block Development Officer Panchayat Samiti. Admittedly, the State Government respondent no.1 promotes such employees like the petitioner to the post of Block Development Officer. Admittedly, the challenge is to the order passed by 2 respondent No.1 in favour of respondent No.4 promoting him as Block Development Officer. Without going further into merits of the matter we accept the contention as raised by the learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4 and in view of the decision in Gangaram Topaji Hupade Vs. Digamber Sadashio Kanwale and another 1991 Maharashtra Law Journal 1204, alternate remedy of filing appeal before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal is available to the petitioner. Therefore, keeping all points open including point of jurisdiction present petition is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE svk