1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.474 OF 2007 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 55 OF 2007 Dattatreya Harishchandra Patil ..Appellants V/s. Ramchandra Barkya Patil & ors. ..Respondents Mr.R.P.Joshi and Sanjay Gawde, advocates for appellants Mr.R.U.Vasekar for respondent nos.5,6,7,8 Mr.S.G.Karandikar for respondent nos. 1/1 to 1/5. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED : 23rd June, 2008 P.C. . Considering the averments made and having seen the detailed averments about possession and as there is no interim relief in operation in favour of appellant till this date, I am not inclined to grant interim order as prayed in this civil application. However, liberty is granted to the appellant to apply for appropriate interim relief by filing application before the Lower Appellate Court, if so instructed. 2. Civil Application is, therefore, disposed of accordingly with such liberty. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.] V. MOHTA,J.] V. MOHTA,J.]