1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET APPELLATE SIDE Criminal Writ Petition No.11 of 2007 ------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders ------------------------------------------------------------ Mr.Atul G. Damle for petitioner. Mr.D.R.More, APP for State. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. September 12, 2007. P.C. . Heard Mr.Damle, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the complaint as well as the reasoning set out by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge while rejecting the criminal revision application challenging the order of issuance of process. . Notwithstanding the reasoning stated by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, it is clear that the contentions raised by the petitioner regarding the liability of any debt or even otherwise issuance of the cheques is a matter which 2 will have to be gone through by adducing evidence and the complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 cannot be quashed solely on the ground that the accused has already filed a suit against the complainant and in respect of the cheques which have been dishonoured. . Hence the petition is rejected. (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)