1 wp 2153-11.sxw pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPLICATION JURISDICTION Writ Petition No. 2153 of 2011 Praveena Lakshaman .. Petitioner v/s. Kaustubh Sudhir Mistry ..Respondent Mr.S.J.Mishra i/b.S.R.S.Legal for the petitioner. Mr.A.M.Vernekar for the respondent CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 18th March, 2011 P.C. : 1. Heard learned Counsels on both sides. The learned Judge of the Family Court at Bombay has permitted respondent to file written statement. Written statement is tendered. 2. Counsel for the petitioner made grievance that written statement is filed without attending counseling session. It is noted that the respondent is staying abroad. In my view, there is no patent mistake which required rectification by exercising powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. No doubt parties have to undergo 2 wp 2153-11.sxw counselling session. Now that the written statement is taken on record, the learned Judge of the Family Court shall, after hearing the advocates on both sides and after seeking convenience of both sides fix date for counseling and pass appropriate order. 3. Written Petition stands disposed of in above terms with no order as to costs. [R.Y.GANOO, J.]