WP(C) 5930/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE I.A.ANSARI Heard Mr. D.A. Kayum, learned counsel, for the petitioner, and Mr. A. Lal, learn ed Standing Counsel, Education Department. The petitioner claims that he is regularly selected Headmaster and, on t he basis of the appointment received, he was to join the post of Headmaster in B ahir Salmara High School, Dhubri. The petitioner accordingly submitted his joini ng report with the Inspector of Schools, Dhubri District Circle, Dhubri, on 01.1 0.2011, but despite the fact that he had submitted his joining report, responden t No.4, namely, Siraj Uddin Sheikh, did not hand over the charge to the petition er. Consequently, the petitioner claims that he could not assume the charge of t he office of the Headmaster of the said school and, on this information being co nveyed by him to the Inspector of Schools, Dhubri, the Inspector of Schools, Dhu bri, passed an order, on 14.10.2011, directing the respondent No.4 to hand over the charge of the office of the Headmaster of the said school. When the matter s tood so poised, the Director of Secondary Education, Govt. of Assam, passed an o rder, on 15.10.2011, keeping the petitioner’s order of appointment in abeyance a nd, as a result thereof, the petitioner has not been able to assume the charge o f the office to which he was appointed. On a query made by the petitioner, he h as learnt that respondent No.4 has filed a writ petition, which has given rise t o WP(C) No.1716/2011, wherein an interim order has been passed directing the par ties to maintain status quo. In view of the fact that the Director’s order, dated 15.10.2011, had been passed , pursuant to the interim direction, which had been passed by the Court, in WP(C ) No.1716/2011, the said order of the Director cannot be said to be without juri sdiction or illegal inasmuch as the Director has merely carried out the interim directions, passed by this Court, in WP(C) No.1716/2011. Situated thus, it becomes clear that this writ petition, which puts to challenge the order, dated 15.10.2011, of the Director, cannot be sustained and the remed y of the petitioner lies in getting himself impleaded in WP(C) No.1716/2011 and, then, he may make necessary application for vacating or modifying the interim o rder passed in the said writ petition. In the above view of the matter, this writ petition is not admitted and, on the request made by the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty gi ven to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in fu ture, if so advised.