IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 5101 of 1992 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- KANTIBHAI SOMABHAI VANKAR Versus RANIP NAGAR PANCHAYAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR GIRISH PATEL for Petitioner MR HS MUNSHAW for Respondent No. 4 None present for other Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE Date of decision: 20/09/1999 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. On 20th August, 1999, this court has given direction to the Chairman, Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority, and President, Ranip Nagar Panchayat - the respondent No.2 to treat the copy of this petition as a representation and to consider the petitioner's case sympathetically and expeditiously more particularly in view of the fact that the petitioner is a physically handicapped person with both the legs paralytic. 2. Shri Munshaw has given out that in pursuance to the direction of this Court, the case of the petitioner has been considered and place has also been identified for allotment of the same to the petitioner for his telephone booth. He further states that relief is likely to be granted to the petitioner but the respondent will take about one week's time to pass the final decision in the matter. 3. In view of the order of this Court dated 20th August, 1999 and the statement made by the counsel for the respondent No.4, nothing now substantial survives in this petition. However, the respondent No.4 shall pass appropriate order within 15 days from today and in case the order goes against the petitioner, then liberty is granted to him for revival of this special civil application by filing a simple note. 4. The Special Civil Application and Rule stand disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. ********** zgs/-