IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revision No. 3364 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : May 9, 2011 Rampreet Bawa and others ...... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ...... Respondent **** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present : None. **** Alok Singh, J (Oral) Present petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated 19.11.2010 allowing the application of the prosecution directing the accused to give their specimen signatures/handwriting for comparison. Present petition was taken up on 20.12.2010, however, none had appeared for the revisionist. Thereafter, petition was listed on 24.12.2010, 18.1.2011 and 20.2.2011, however, none could appear on behalf of the petitioner. In the present case prosecution moved an application to obtain specimen signatures/handwriting of the accused and court below directed the accused to give specimen signatures/handwriting. No jurisdictional error is found in the impugned order. Revision petition is misconceived. Dismissed. (Alok Singh) Judge May 9, 2011 Anand