IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10683 of 2008 ASHOK BIRAJEE Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04/ 27.08.2008 Heard. The petitioner is named in the FIR on account of being named by some of the persons of the surrounding of the place of occurrence. His statement was recorded subsequently in the case diary as well. Considering the additional ground seeking an order of bail is that Arun Kumar Yadav, who was also named in the FIR on the similar facts, has been granted bail by me in Cr. Misc. Petition No. 16819 of 2008. I have perused the case diary today and I find that order of bail passed by me in favour of Arun Kumar Yadav is also against the facts. Hence, let a notice be issued to the said accused Arun Kumar Yadav as to why this court should not cancel its own order passed in the above noted Cr. Misc. Petition and direct the remand of the said Arun Kumar Yadav to custody. As regards the prayer of present petitioner Ashok Birajee, the same is dismissed. DKS/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J)