1 jpc/- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7308 OF 2008 Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi .. Petitioner Versus The Security Guards Board for the Greater Bombay and Thane District .. Respondents and others Ms. Ranjana J. Todankar, for the Petitioner Ms. Lata Desai i/b Ms. Pallavi Divekar for respondent No.1 CORAM: J. N. PATEL, & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED: 18th June, 2009 P. C. 1. Heard. 2. Rule, returnable forthwith. 3. This petition is filed by the petitioner seeking directions against respondent No.1 to register the Security Guards listed at Exhibit- A to the petition and to allot them to respondent No.2 establishment. 4. The learned Counsel appearing for repsondent No.1 states that approximately 13000 applications are received by the Respondent No. 1- Board and the process of registration of the Security Guards is going on. She further submits that after completion of the process of registration, they will be allotted to the appropriate establishments. 2 5. We accept the statement made on behalf of the Respondent Board and in view of the said statement nothing survives in the matter. 6. Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid term. 7. The Petition is disposed of accordingly. 8. No order as to costs. ( MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (J. N. PATEL, J.)