IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17080 of 2011 RAJENDRA MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 27.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the state. The petitioner is named in the first information report but no specific allegation has been levelled against him rather it is stated that he alongwith other FIR named accused persons assaulted the deceased and others with Lathi and Danda. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has no concern with the family of FIR named accused Rajkumar Jha with whom the family members of the informant had some altercation. It is further contended by him that as a matter of fact, the petitioner is neighbour of both the parties and he has been implicated in this case only on suspicion. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Rajendra Mahto be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with K. Hat P.S. Case No. 55 of 2011 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)