(1) SA. 570.2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 570 OF 2009 Ashok S/o Narayan Kadam died through LRs. and others .. Appellants VERSUS Narayan S/o Nivrutti Kadam .. Respondent Mrs. M.A. Kulkarni, Advocate for the appellants CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATED : 14TH AUGUST, 2009 P.C.:- 1] This second appeal is filed against two concurrent judgments, partly allowing the appellants’ suit for partition. . The Courts below held that out of the land suit property consisting of 9 pieces of agricultural land, only 7 pieces of land were joint family property. The Courts below held that the other two pieces of land were self-acquired property of the respondent and were, thus not subjected to partition. The conclusion of the lower Courts was mainly based on the admission given by one of the plaintiffs (Ashok, since deceased) during the cross- examination, that the two pieces of land in question were self-acquired properties of his father. This admission was used against the appellants. (2) SA. 570.2009 2] At this stage, there cannot be re-appreciation of the evidence of the parties. There appears no substantive question of law involved in the appeal. The appeal, should therefore fail. 3] The Second Appeal stands dismissed. Sd/- (A.V. NIRGUDE, J.) arp