CWP No. 520 of 2006 3.12.2008 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Addl. A.G. and Mr. Vikas Rathore, Dy.A.G. for respondents No. 1 & 2. Mr. N.K. Thakur, Advocate for respondent No.3. The Court has passed the following order on 3.11.2008: “The Court after perusing the entire record came to the opinion that the termination, prima facie, is not in accordance with law. However, during the course of the hearing, a suggestion was made by Mr. Ajay Sharma that the proceedings can be put to an end if the respondents agree to pay Rs. 1,50,000/- towards full and final settlement to the petitioner. This sum has been agreed to by Mr. N.K. Thakur on the basis of instructions imparted to him by Mr. Bhupinder Singh. However, both the parties pray for and are allowed a week’s time to complete the codal formalities.” In sequel to order dated 3.11.2008, Vice Presidient of respondent No.3/Society is present in person. He has also brought cheque amounting to Rs. 1,50,000/- bearing No. 272431 dated 10.11.2008 to be paid to the petitioner towards the full and final settlement of the case. The cheque has been received by the client of Shri Ajay Sharma in his presence. However, Mr. Ajay Sharma has drawn the attention of the Court that property of the petitioner has been attached in pursuance of recovery proceedings and the entries have been made in the revenue record to this effect. Mr. N.K. Thakur submits that the Society i.e. respondent No.3 shall have no objection in getting these entries corrected. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of on the following terms: 1. A sum of Rs. 1,50,000/- received by the petitioner is towards full and final settlement of the case. 2. The petitioner has absolute liberty to get the revenue entries corrected. 3. Neither the petitioner nor the respondent No.3 has any outstanding amounts against each other. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), J. December 3, 2008. (cr)