IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA NO.1233 of 2004 DATE OF DECISION. January 16, 2007. SDO DHBVN Hansi and others ......Appellants. Versus Mani Ram ......Respondent CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL PRESENT Mr. N. D. Achint, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Parveen Hans , Advocate for respondent no.1. VINEY MITTAL , J( Oral ) The claim made by the plaintiff / respondent no.1 that the action of the defendant DHBVN that the arrears claimable from the son of the plaintiff had been wrongly added to the account of the plaintiff has been upheld by the trial Court. The appeal filed by the defendant has been dismissed by the Appellate Court. Nothing has been shown that the findings recorded by the two Courts below suffer from any infirmity or are contrary to law. No question of law, much less, any substantial question of law arises in the present appeal. Dismissed. January 16, 2007 ( VINEY MITTAL ) mamta JUDGE