IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P(T) No. 4962 of 2008. Decided on: 1st September, 2010. Narinder Kumar. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. J.L. Bhardwaj, Advocate. For respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner was selected as Constable. His documents were sent for verification to the Superintendent of Police, Solan. The Superintendent of Police has informed that eight criminal cases have been registered against the petitioner during the relevant period. It is in these circumstances that the petitioner has not been offered appointment to the post of Constable taking into consideration his character and antecedents. There is no illegality in the action of respondents in denying the appointment to the petitioner in view of the details of the cases given in the reply. 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge September 01, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.