IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.356 of 2009 RANJITA RAMAN, DAUGHTER OF SRI RANA RAKESH RAMAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-LAUNA, POST OFFICE AND POLICE STATION- TARAPUR, DISTRICT-MUNGER. -APPELLANT Versus 1. THE VICE CHANCELLOR,T.M.BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. 2. THE REGISTRAR, TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. 3. PRINCIPAL, S.M.COLLEGE, BHAGALPUR, DISTRICT-BHAGALPUR. 4. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, S.M. COLLEGE, BHAGALPUR, DISTRICT- BHAGALPUR. 5. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. -RESPONDENTS ------- For the Appellant : M/s Suman Kr. Mishra Ram Kishore Pathak & Alok Kr. Tiwari For the TM Bhagalpur: Mr. Ashok Kr. Keshari University 22 09.04.2009 Writ-petitioner appeared in B.A. Eng (Hons) Part-III examination. Writ-petitioner’s result was not published. According to the writ-petitioner, she approached the Principal for the result and the Principal stated orally that she had not appeared in the examination but there is no evidence for such statement made by the Principal. The writ- 2 petitioner filed representation before the Principal and the Vice Chancellor in University through lawyer. Her mark sheet was issued to the writ –petitioner. She filed CWJC no. 2519 of 2008 for re-evaluation. The learned Judge dismissed the writ petition holding that the mark sheet was issued to the writ-petitioner and the writ-petitioner cannot make any grievance. We are of the opinion that no interference is required in this appeal. If re-calculation of the mark sheet or re-evaluation is necessary, it is for the writ petitioner to apply for the same as per rules, if it is allowable under the rule . The appeal is dismissed. (J.B. Koshy, CJ.) (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.) AAhmad