IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6755 of 2011 1. TRILOKI SINGH SON OF LATE MUKHLAL SINGH 2. AJAY SINGH, SON OF TRILOKI SINGH BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- AMRUDHI TOLA, P.S. NAWANAGAR (SONBARSHA O.P.) DISTRICT- BUXAR --- PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --- OPP. PARTY. ----------- 3/ 04-05-2011 Heard the parties. 2. Prayer for bail made on behalf of the petitioners was earlier rejected by an order dated 27.10.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 24854 of 2010 (Annexure-1) with an observation that the petitioners shall be at liberty to renew their prayer for bail on completion of one year in judicial custody. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1 is in judicial custody since 25.01.2010 and petitioner no.2 is in judicial custody since 01.02. 2010. 4. From the report submitted by learned trial court also it appears that there is no possibility of conclusion of trial in near future. 5. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for bail is allowed. The above-named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection 2 with Nawanagar P.S. Case No. 2 of 2010, subject to conditions that : (A) One of the bailors must be government servant, (B) Another bailor must be either family member or close relative of the petitioners, who will file an affidavit in the court below showing his/her relationship with the petitioners, (C) if the petitioners are found involved in same and similar nature of cases in future, then in that case the informant/ prosecution shall be at liberty to file a petition for cancellation of the bail of the petitioners, and if such a petition is filed, the court below would be obliged to dispose of the same in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned and (D) the petitioners shall make regular pairvi in the court below in the present case either by appearing themselves in person or through representation by their lawyer on each and every dates, and if on two consecutive dates petitioners fail to make 3 pairvi, then the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners. BTiwary/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)