1 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.693 OF 2010. KISHOR SHANKARRAO VAIDYA & ONE VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PSO PS CHIMUR, CHANDRAPUR. _________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri Abhay Sambre Advocate for the applicant. Shri S.S. Doifode, APP for the State respondent. Shri N.D. Khamborkar Advocate for assist to Prosecution. Coram : A.H. JOSHI, J. Date : 15th JUNE, 2010. 1. This Court had observed in the order dated 7-5-2010 that the applicant ought to pay the amount which has received by way of advance. 2. Learned Advocate for the applicant states that out of said amount of advance of Rs.13,98,250/-,an amount of Rs.13,00,000/- (Rupees Thirteen lacs) has been paid to the society by Demand Drafts. Learned Advocate Mr. N. D. Khamborkar confirms the receipt of the amount. 3. It is seen that the applicant came in picture as a Contractor. There is a dispute about propriety of applicant's entry as a Contractor as he is the son of the President. Considering that the matter pertains to a contract, the transaction may involve some illegality 2 or impropriety, however, prima facie, it may not be the case of an offence. 4. In this background, the applicant is entitled to the relief of anticipatory bail prayed for. 5. Order of ad interim bail granted by this Court on 7-5-2010 is made absolute. 6. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses or otherwise or record etc. Judge |mule|