IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1203 of 2011 1. MANOJ KUMAR CHAUHAN @ MANOJ CHAUHAN. 2. Surendra Chauhan. ………Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 09.02.2011 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and later on Section 120(B) and 201 of the Indian Penal Code was also added. It is alleged that someone called on the mobile of the victim then the victim left his house and thereafter he did not return and subsequently his dead body was recovered. It is alleged in the F.I.R. that suspicion has been made against several persons including the petitioners. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that one co-accused Dahani Devi has been granted anticipatory bail by a Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 31207 of 2010 passed on 25.10.2010. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the State that it was the petitioner no. 1’s mobile from which the victim received last call when he left the house, which is denied by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 2 Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner no. 2, namely, Surendra Chauhan, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in connection with Narhat(Sitamarhi) P.S. Case No. 88 of 2008. So far as anticipatory bail of petitioner no. 1, namely, Manon Kumar Chauhan @ Manoj Chauhan is concerned, let the learned Court below verify the last call received by the victim and if it is found that victim did not receive the last call from the petitioner no. 1 then he will also be released on the same condition as that of petitioner no.2. Bhardwaj ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)