S.B. Cr.Misc. II Bail No. 444/2007 (Sona Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 23.08.2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr. G.J.Gupta for the petitioner. Mr. V.R.Mehta, P.P. Mr. Kailash Khatri for the complainant. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The order impugned is dated 17.11.2006 and more than nine months have elapsed. By now, the trial court might have recorded the statements of some of the witnesses. In this view of the matter, it is appropriate to permit the petitioner to move a fresh bail application before the trial court so that the latest stage of the case can reflect in the order of the trial court. The second bail application is therefore, dismissed. If the petitioner moves bail application before the trial court, the trial court shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law without being influenced by the earlier order dated 17.11.2006. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp