IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13364 of 2009 KRISHNA KUMAR SINHA @ KRISHNA KUMAR SINGH, SON OF LATE HARIHAR PRASAD SINHA, RESIDENT OF DHAURANI TOLA, MOKAMA, P.S. MOKAMA DISTRICT – PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRICT GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR, PROVIDENT FUND, BIHAR PATNA. 4. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, BEGUSARAI 5. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BEGUSARAI. 6. THE DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER, BEGUSARAI. 7. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, SARAN, CHAPRA 8. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, BIRCHAND PATEL PATH PATNA ----------- 02. 12.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent – State. The grievance of the petitioner is that although he has been paid Provident fund dues amounting to Rs. 2,01, 265/- by different letters issued by respondent no. 3, but the sum of Rs. 1,85,630/- has still remained to be paid. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that on perusal of the letter no. 244 dated 13.04.2007 and letter no. 434 dated 28.06.2007, it would appear that the District, Provident Fund Officer has been taking necessary instructions from the Director, Provident Fund as also the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. However for want of necessary instructions, the final calculation for payment of provident fund dues could not be paid. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents – State submits that in case petitioner files a representation stating the details of his claims, the same would be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his claims, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the Director, Provident Fund Officer, Patna enclosing the copy of the relevant documents if any, in support of such claim along with certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks from today. In case such representation is filed, the Director, Provident Fund Officer, Patna shall consider the claim raised by the petitioner in his representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievance of the petitioner with regard to the balance provident fund dues could be settled without delay. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)