WP(C) 4136/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANIMA HAZARIKA Heard Mr N. Hoque, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard M r P. Roy, learned state counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 as well as Mr M. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 4 and 5. The petitioner by filing the instant writ petition has challenged the notices da ted 20th July, 2011 (Annexure 1) and 9th August, 2011 (Annexure 3), whereby and whereunder, the petitioner has been called for to convene special meeting fixin g 12th August, 2011 for taking necessary steps to express no confidence upon the petitioner, who is a chairperson of Sarthebari Town Committee in Barpeta Distri ct. One of the ground of challenge is that a special meeting has to be called by no t less then three (3) members. But, such notices were issued by two (2) members and as such, there is infraction of the provisions contained in section 43(2) of the Assam Municipal Act, 1956. An affidavit-in-opposition has been filed on behalf of respondent Nos. 4 and 5 w herein it has been stated on oath at paragraph 2 that respondent Nos. 4 and 5 ha ve withdrawn the no confidence requisition letters dated 20.07.2011 as well as m eeting on 12.08.2011. The copy of the withdrawal letter dated 12.08.2011 signed by respondent Nos. 4 and 5 has been signed by the Chairperson, Sarthebari Town C ommittee/the writ petitioner on 12.08.2011 itself and the receipt of the said no tice has also been acknowledged by the Chairperson. The aforesaid letters have been annexed with the affidavit as Annexure -A&A (1) respectively. In view of the statements made on oath at paragraph 2 of the affidavit, it seems that the respondent authority has already taken care of the grievance raised by the petitioner and therefore, nothing remains to be adjudicated upon. Writ petition, accordingly stands disposed of. Interim order passed earlier is made absolute.