IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.787 of 2008 Chandra Bhushan Sharma, son of Sri Sayendra Narayan Sharma, resident of village-Sahuri, P.S.-Birpur, District- Begusarai. ………….Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Ram Raji Paswan, son of Mukhilal Paswan. 3. Chandra Bihari Paswan, son of Mukhilal Paswan. 4. Mukhilal Paswan, son of Late Jeetan Paswan. 5. Maksudan Paswan, son of Ram Bhajan Paswan. 6. Sita Ram Paswan, son of Medani Paswan. 7. Prem Sagar Paswan, son of Medni Paswan. 8. Shatrughan Paswan, son of Medani Paswan. 9. Bharat Paswan, son of Medani Paswan. (All residents of village-Sahuri, P.S.-Beerpur (Barauni, District- Begusarai) ………..Opposite Parties ---------------------------------- 12. 08.12.2011 The informant petitioner has preferred this revision application against the judgment and order dated 18.02.2008 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Begusarai in G.R. No.2137/2002, Trial No.540/2008 arising out of Barauni P.S. Case No.371/2002 by which the accused opposite party nos.2 to 9 have been acquitted. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. While passing the order of acquittal through his judgment dated 18.02.2008, the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Begusarai has discussed the 2 evidence produced on behalf of both the parties. After having heard the learned counsel for both the sides and after going through the judgment, I find that the view taken by the learned Judicial Magistrate was the probable view and in that light, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This petition is dismissed. V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)