IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1131 of 2010 1. JITENDRA KUMAR S/O LATE JAIKANT MAHTO R/O VILL.- BAHADURPUR, BLOCK AND P.S. GORAUL, DISTT.- VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPTT., GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR DISTT.- VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR 5. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR DISTT.- VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR 6. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, GORAUL, DISTT.- VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR 7. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, GORAUL, DISTT.- VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR 8. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, BHUALPUR @ BAHADURPUR, BLOCK- GORAUL, DISTT.- VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR 9. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, BHUALPUR @ BAHADURPUR, BLOCK- GORAUL, DISTT.- VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR ----------- 3 29/11/2010 There is valid ground not to allow the petitioner to work on the post of Panchayat Teacher because department of Human Resources Development, Government of Bihar has clearly indicated in their notification the name of the Institutions whose degrees will not be considered to be valid for appointment on the post. There is no dispute that the petitioner is supposed to have passed Madhyama Visharad from Hindi Sashitya - 2 - Sammelan, Allahabad, an Institution not recognized by the respondents. Since petitioner’s appointment is under the State, he must fulfill the conditions of such appointment including eligibility in terms of the degree which is supposed to form basis for such appointment. So long the notification or de-recognition of these Institutions including the Institution from where the petitioner has passed examination remains to be in operation, petitioner cannot claim to occupy the post in question. This writ application has no merit. It is dismissed. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)