iMRI F RFM iSHtei-2- si-t' IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (2271 N0. iao6 /2010 (S.B.) PETITIONER PLAINTIFF ^" Dharam Singh, S/o Bhaiyaram Sahu, Caste Teli, aged about 50. years, R/o Village Dhaneli, Tahsil Gurur, Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS/ ./: 1 DEFENDANTS ^'^€f \0.--"" y..-si\v1-Y'\/^VA"' ...'•;^-^'^" . 2. ^^yy" '?^'"''' - -<•'''' /•' </ 3. 4. 5. 6. Smt. Rajeshwari D/o Shyamlal Sahu, aged about non mentions R/o ViUage Palari, Tahsil Gurur, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Ku-.Pemin D/o Shyamlal Sahu, aged about not mention, R/o ViUage Biretara, Tahsil Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) Yogesh Kumar S/o Hemuram Sahu, aged about 28 years, Vinod Kumar S/p Hemi-u-am Sahu, aged about 20 years, Ku. Kirti D/o Hemuram Sahu, ftU^ aged about 22 years'^R/o Village Joratarai, Tahsil Dhamtari (C.G.) & Distt. Smt. Keshar Bai, D/o Hemuram Sahu, aged about 24 years, R/o Village Machandur, Tahsil &, Distt. Durg (C.G.) -2-. / ^ ''7. Smt. Radha Bai, D/o Bhaiyaram Sahu, aged about not mention R/o Village Mohai, Tahsil Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) 8. Smt. Narad Bai, D/o Bhaiyaram Sahu, aged about not mention R/o Village Hemakhurda, Tahsil Dondi, Distt. Durg (C.G.) ^9. Smt. Bheeraa Bai, D/o Bhairam Sahu, aged about not raention R/o Village Kolihamar, Tahsil Gurur, Distt. Durg (C.G.) ^ 10. Pardeshi Ram, S/o Hinchha Ram Sahu, aged about 57 years, R/o Village DhaneU, Tahsil Gurur, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 11. Govind Ram S/o Pardeshi Ram Sahu, aged about 40 years, R/o Village Dhaneli, Tahsil Gurur, Distt. Durg (C.G.) /12. Smt. Jyoti, Wd/o Late Kaliram Sahu, aged about 48 years, R/o Village Dhaneli, Tahsil Gurur, Distt. Durg (C.G.) /13. Manish Kumar S/o Late Kaliram Sahu, aged about 23 years, R/o Village Dhaneli, Tahsil Gurur, Distt. Durg (C.G.) ^14. Ku. Devlaxmi, S/o Late Kaliram Sahu, aged about 26 years. R/o Village Dhaneli, Tahsil Gumr, Distt. Durg (C.G.) /l5. Khemuram S/o Shyamlal Sahu, aged about 44 years, R/o Village Dhaneli, Tahsil Gurur, Distt. Durg (C.G.) ,16. State of Chhattisgarh Through - District Collector Distt. Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA -o' "•^lj^ ll:i^$£< (;:A"^ .^f">',.^-l" -:—:-^t3 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Sinale Bench: Hon'bte Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mlishra PETITIONER PLAINTIFF RESPONDENTS DEFENDANTS Wrtt Petition (227) No.1208 / 2010 Dharam Sir^h Versus Smt. Raieshwari and others. Shri Jitendra Gufrta, counsel for the petiti<mer. Miss Sangeeta Mishra, P.L. for the State/resporejent No.16. WRTr PETmON UNDER AOTICUE 227 OF THE CONSTnTUnnON OF INEMA ORALORDER <22.03.2818) Counsel for the petit'ioner submits ttat after dismissal of the ptaintiffs suit for decteffation of possession the p^itioner has moved an applteation under Oreter 41 Rule 5 of C.P.C. for staying the execution of the decree. This appl'ication has been rqected by the first appetlate Court. (2) AdmittecUy, the trial Court has not p^sed any executable decree in favour of any of tt»party. The decree prepared after dismissir^ the suit is never an executalrte decree. If the <rther party is proceeding tefore the revenue Court to get their name recorded in the revenue records, the appropriate remedy for the p^'rtioner is to move an application for grant of temporary injunction uraler Oreter 39 Rule 1 & 2 of C.P.C. to restrain the oppostte party from mutatir^ their name in the revenue record. (f the petttioner so desires, he may move such iipplication before the lower appellate Court. "3^ la^..: 1 '"%yt& i ~J./ nw°y '•^y.-s'^?''' (3) There is no error ot jurisdictron in the impugned oidw. The instant petition under Articte 227 of the Constttution of tndia faite and ss hereby dismissed with the aforesakl daservation. prashatt Sd//- _.. tiumarMishra Jud&e Y-