IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. -M No. 24704 of 2011 (O&M) Sonu Swami .. Petitioner v. State of Punjab .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Ravinder Kaur Nihalsinghwala, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. ... Rajesh Bindal J. The allegation against the petitioner in the FIR is that he along with certain other persons entered the house of the complainant, who is a widowed lady living in Mohali, and damaged TV and other household articles. As per allegations in the FIR, they had gone to the house of the complainant to threaten her in a property dispute of the complainant with her brother-in-law and sister-in-law. Photographs of the site taken by the police immediately after the incident were produced in court for perusal. It is only the petitioner, who was named in the FIR along with other persons, though subsequently the complainant named certain other persons as well. However, considering the fact that the petitioner was specifically named in the FIR, I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. Dismissed. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 24.8.2011 mk