WP(C) 399/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE IA ANSARI Heard Mr. D. Sharma, learned counsel, for the petitioner, and Mr. B. K. Sharma, learned Standing Counsel, Social Welfare Department, for the respondents. The basic grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition, made under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is that respondent No.6, who ha s been appointed as Anganwadi Worker, at No.23 Birja Basti Angwanwadi Center, un der Chayduar ICDS Project, is not a local resident of village Kuruabasti (Birja Basti). By filing affidavit, respondent No.6 has denied the allegation and asser ts that respondent No.6 is a local resident of village Kuruabasti (Birja Basti). It is, thus, clear that it is a disputed question of fact as to whether responde nt No.6 is or is not a local resident of village Kuruabasti (Birja Basti), which falls under Chayduar ICDS Project, in the district of Sonitpur, Assam. Determin ation of such a disputed question of fact would require holding of roving inquir y and also recording of evidence, which is not appropriate in the facts and circ umstances of the present case. In fact, in a similar situation, which arose in WP(C) No.5864/2009, the Court di sposed of the writ petition, on 09.03.2011, by permitting the petitioner to make appropriate representation to the Director, Social Welfare Department, Governme nt of Assam, with further direction to the Director, Social Welfare Department, Government of Assam, to hear all the partied concerned and, then, take a decisio n in accordance with law. Considering the matter in its entirety and in the interest of justice, this writ petition too is disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner that if the petitioner feels aggrieved by the appointment of respondent No.6, she may make a ppropriate representation to Director, Social Welfare Department, Government of Assam, and if such an application is made, the Director, Social Welfare Departme nt, Government of Assam, shall hear all the parties concerned and, then, pass ne cessary order(s) in accordance with law. If the petitioner feels aggrieved by th e decision, which may be reached by Director, Social Welfare Department, Governm ent of Assam, the petitioner shall remain at liberty to take recourse to such pr ovisions of law as may be permissible.