IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 26TH AUGUST 2011 / 4TH BHADRA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 814 of 2011(S) ------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.28524/2009 Dated 05/08/2010 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER ---------------------------------- K.MOHANDAS, S/O. K.M.DIVAKARAN, AGED 56 YEARS, KUTTIYIL VEEDU,VALIAKULAM, CHERUKULANJI P.O.,RANNI, PATHANAMTHITTA BY ADVS. SMT.SREEDEVI KYLASANATH SMT.SHALEENA RAJAN RESPONDENT(S):3RD RESPONDENT IN THE ABOVE WRIT PETITION. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A.SYED,( AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI. LAKSHMI NARAYANAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs COC. NO. 814/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A1:COPY OF PETITIONER'S LIABILITY CERTIFICATE DATED 10/02/2010 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT PRIOR TO JUDGMENT IN WPC.28524/2009 INCLUDING AUDIT RECOVERY FROM PETITIONER'S DCRG, WHICH PETITIONER RECEIVED UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT. ANNEXURE A1(a):COPY OF GRATUITY PAYMENT ORDER DATED 28/05/2010. ANNEXURE A2:COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 5TH AUGUST, 2010 IN WPC.28524/2009. ANNEXURE A3:COPY OF THE FORWARDING LETTER DATED 05/01/2011 ADDRESSED TO THE RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE A4:COPIES OF THE POSTAL RECEIPTS DATED 05/01/2011. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Cont.Case(C).No.814 of 2011-S = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 26th day of August, 2011. Judgment After the judgment in the writ petition is issued, respondents and other officials have authorized payment of amounts covered by an order which is already communicated to the petitioner. Hence, this contempt of court case is closed leaving open all other issues, including the correctness of that decision and any claim that the petitioner may have on the basis or against that order. Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, Judge. Sha/2708