..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1844 OF 2008 Hitendra Ashok Parmar. ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Ms.Soniya Miskin, Adv. appointed for the applicnat, absent. Mr.Shreeram Shirsat, Adv. appointed for the applicant on today. Mr.S.S.Pednekar, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 5th September, 2008. DATED : 5th September, 2008. DATED : 5th September, 2008. P.C.: 1. The applicant has preferred this application through jail. Ms.Saniya Miskin Advocate was appointed to represent the applicant. However, she is not present. Mr.Shreeram Shirsat the learned Advocate who is on the panel of High Court Legal Services Committee has kindly consented to appear for the applicant in this matter. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in Sessions Case No.674 of 2006 along with Sessions Case ..(2).. No.141 of 2007 pending before the Sessions Court at Dindoshi. The said case pertains to C.R. No.256 of 2006 of Malad police station. The said case is mainly under Section 364A of IPC. The learned APP states that all the witnesses have been examined and now only the I.O. remains to be examined. It is further stated that the examination-in-chief of the I.O. is over and only cross-examination remains. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to grant bail to the applicant at this stage. Application for bail is rejected. 3. Office to pay Mr.Shreeram Shirsat, Advocate the fees as per the rules. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)