IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 31ST JANUARY 2011 / 11TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 3070 of 2011(G) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ SANTHA KUMAR, S/O.RAMAN, KUNGUMA BHAVAN, MAVADI P.O., KULAKKADA VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA. BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT, COLLECTORATE, KOLLAM.PIN- 691 001 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOLLAM.PIN- 691 001 3. THE THAHASILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT.691 001 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KULAKKADA VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT.691 506 5. KULAKKADA GRAMA PANCHAYAH, KULAKKADA, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT.691 521 R1 TO R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P (C) No.3070 of 2011 -------------------------- Dated this the 31st January, 2011 J U D G M E N T The complaint of the petitioner is that inaction on the part of the Revenue Divisional Officer on Ext.P3 application made by the petitioner for removal of soil from the property mentioned therein, for the purpose of construction of a house. Petitioner justifies her claim relying on Ext.P5 Government Order and Ext.P6 judgment. Now that according to the petitioner Ext.P3 application is pending, at this stage, what is required is that the 2nd respondent should consider Ext.P3 and pass orders thereon. This the 2nd respondent shall do at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE ma /True copy/ P.A to Judge