1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO.281 OF 2010 IN L.P.A. NO. 235 OF 2010 IN W.P. NO. 3046 OF 2001 (D) (Ku. Jaya d/o Ramkrishna Maturkar ..vs.. Wainganga Bahuddeshiya Vikas Sanstha and others) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shri M.V. Samarth, Counsel for the appellant. Shri A.S. Jaiswal, Counsel for respondent No.2. CORAM:- D.B. BHOSALE AND P. B. VARALE, JJ. DATED :- 10 th JUNE, 2010 Heard learned Counsel for the parties. By this civil application, the applicant/appellant has prayed for stay of the impugned judgments. Learned Counsel for the applicant/appellant, however, states that the applicant would be satisfied if the appointment, if any, is made by the respondent/Institute, on the post on which the applicant/appellant was appointed, it may be made subject to outcome of the appeal and if such observation is made, he has instructions not to press the prayers in the application. Learned Counsel for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 has not 2 opposed the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant/appellant. In view thereof it is made clear that if the respondent/Institute makes any appointment on the post which was held by the applicant/appellant before her termination, it would be subject to outcome of the appeal. It is needless to state that if the respondent/Institute makes an appointment on the said post, it shall inform the candidate about this order. With these observations, the Civil Application is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE pma