S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.609 of 2006 Shakuntala Devi Vs. Board of Revenue, Ajmer & Others Date of Order ::: 21/07/2008. Hon'ble Mr. Prem Shanker Asopa, J. Mr. Rajeev Sogarwal, Counsel for the Petitioner **** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The Revenue Appellate Authority has remanded this matter vide its order dated 27.02.2001, which was confirmed by the Board of Revenue vide its order dated 05.07.2005. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of remand is not legal and justified. The Revenue Appellate Authority as well as Board of Revenue have considered all the aspects of the matter i.e. at the time of filing of the civil suit for partition by the daughter, father was alive and subsequently the share has been demanded from the land of Radha Kishan and brother of the petitioner and not from the land of Kishan Singh. Although, there are approximately 10-issues, but certain issues are required to be decided after taking into consideration the evidence on record as well as legal position. Counsel for the petitioner has not been able to point out any error in the impugned orders. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and in my view the order is legal and justified as the judgment of the Assistant Collector was lacunic. The writ petition fails and the same is hereby dismissed. (Prem Shanker Asopa) J. ashok/