hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10234 OF 2009 Indian Bank .. Petitioner Versus Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr. .. Respondents Mr. Ajit Salvi8 i/by Mr. Anant B. Shinde for Petitioner. Mr. S.M. Gorwadkar for R. No. 1. Mr. V.S. Masurkar, G.P. For R. No. 2. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & K.K. TATED JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 11, 2009 P.C. Rule. Heard forthwith. The issue is squarely covered by the judgment of this court in Bank of Baroda and Ors. Versus Pune Municipal Corporation and Ors. In Writ Petition No. 9343 of 2009 decided on 17th November, 2009. The Petitioners, if they have not yet paid octroi, to pay the same within fifteen days from today. In so far as compounding fees is concerned, rule made absolute in terms of Prayer Clause (a). (K.K. TATED, J.) (F,I. REBELLO,J.)