1 A-414-1184-11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 414 OF 2011 WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1184 OF 2011 Farman Ismail Kazi ... Applicant (Orig. accused) vs. State of Maharashtra ... Respondent And Swapnali Pravin Ghag ... Intervener (Orig. complainant) Mr.V.V.Purwant,Advocate, for the applicant. Mrs. P.P.Shinde, APP for the respondent - State. Shri P.D.Dalvi, Advocate for the Intervener (in APPP No.414/2011). CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 27th September, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard. The Application No.414 of 2011 for intervention filed by the widow of the deceased is allowed and stands disposed of. 2. This is second bail application filed by the original accused No.7 for bail in Crime No.36./2010 regstered with Sawarde Police Station, Ratnagiri for the offence of murder and conspiracy to commit murder. The previous application was rejected by this Court on 3.3.2011. I do not find any change in circumstances. 2 A-414-1184-11.sxw 3. The learned Counsel for the applicant contends that after rejection of the application of the present applicant, another accused Dharmendra Lad was granted bail by this Cort. In fact, in th order dated 15.7.2011 granting bail to Dharmendra Lad, the learned Judge had noted that except suspicion there was no other material agaist said Dharmendra. In fact, in similar circumstances and for the same reasons, I had also granted bail to another accused Baliram Ghag, while rejecting the bail application of the present applicant and another accused Kishore Ghag. Merely because two other accused persons, against whom there was no material except suspicion, were granted bail, the present applicant against whom there is sufficient material material also be granted bail. 4. Therefore, the application stands rejected. 5. The learned Counsel for the parties inform that the charge-sheet was filed and the case has been committed to the Court of Sessions and is pending before the Addl. Sessions Judge, Khed. As some of the accused persons are in custody for last more than one year, the learned Addl. Sessions Judge shall expedite the trial and dispose of the case as early as possible and preferably by the end of this year. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)