IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 2ND JUNE 2008 / 12TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 16215 of 2008(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- PADMANABHAN NAIR, 4/361, THIRUVONAM NORTH KALAMASSERY, ERNAKULAM BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKU LAM, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, RTA, ERNAKULAM 3. THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KSRTC, ERNAKULAM 4. THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA SRI.K.PRABHAKRAN FOR KSRTC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 16215 OF 2008 E ==================== Dated this the 2nd day of June, 2008 J U D G M E N T Ext.P1 is an order passed by the RTA declining curtailment applied for by the petitioner on the ground that if allowed it will adversely affect the travelling public. Yet another reason stated is one of overlapping. It is seen that against Ext.P1, appeal was filed before the Tribunal and that was rejected by Ext.P3. The Tribunal has gone through the files and confirmed the finding that if allowed, the curtailment will adversely affect the travelling public. Nothing is produced to indicate that the reasoning of the Tribunal is perverse and in such circumstances, this court will not be justified in upsetting the factual findings concurrently rendered by the authorities. Writ petition fails and is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp