IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 9981 of 2004 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.R.VORA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- INDERSING BAJERAM DHIMAN Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 9981 of 2004 MR RD RAVAL for Petitioner No. 1 MR HM PRACHCHHAK, AGP for Respondent No.3 RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 1-2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.R.VORA Date of decision: 25/01/2005 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. Heard the learned advocate for the parties. 2. This Special Civil Application is preferred by the petitioner against the order passed by the District Magistrate, Vadodra on 28.07.2004 directing the detention of petitioner as dangerous person under the PASA Act. 3. Learned AGP Mr.H.M.Prachchhak, on instruction, submits that the order under challenge in this petition is revoked by the State Government on 6th September, 2004 and the petitioner is set at liberty. The petition, therefore, became infructuous. 4. In above view of the matter, this petition stands disposed of having become infructuous. Rule is discharged. [J. R. VORA,J.] (vijay)