v ^5g-S»T^p^& IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUREAT CMMINAL MISC. PETITION N0. OF BILASPUR (C.G1 of2010 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL Single Bench PETITION UNDER SECTION PROCEDURE FOR QUASHING OF F.I.R'-'AND ACCORDINGLY FOR QUASHING FINAL REPORT SB THE CRIMINAL CASE N0. 1092/tlD PENDING BEFORE THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE BILASPUR. PETITIONER : .^°..^' <^s^'^ ~^^^^ -^':'%^ ^: ,-• '' y ^-^ . V®3";. '- "^ •:,>»••»1^< .'! .» Bharat Lal Khare , S/o Late Shivcharan Khare, aged about 46 years, Posted as Principal Government Higher Secondary School, Parsadiha, Block- Jaijaipur, District Janjjgir-Champa, Also having charge of Master Trainer in Tehsil Jaijaipur, District Janjgir-Champa, R/o Khaparganj, Behind Laxinin.arayan Lodge,Bilaspur, Police Station Citykotwali, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G) RESPONDENT: VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through Police Station, Torwa, Bilaspur^ District Bilaspur (C.G) 31^1 W f<-f!4 ^fsn sntRi gmjq; 75f "4NIW4, yflly'IC, Pl<?1Wy _.^_ Gr-rm^-'^-'^') ) 1'0 ^ITHPTT a»*»ra» Sff^I 'V^i (lj°lfj«f<^I) wwgtefsn^i <!ft(*<l<n<ftl ^W^ft' "^f 1^^ ^l-^< ^'afRnsn^r SB : Hon'bieShri BilanjnoTa ft han Shrivastava, J, 27-09-2010 onri onaiienara ooni, Shri Ravlndra Agrawai, F i iliS Detltion unflsr Bect; counsei B/DUUiu ano ti'ie crrai'ss snee i—nrriinai\^sse NU. luyAiu. i-eamea counsei TOI ine Taiseiy irnpiicarea uy ine corng subm'ts that the petiiionei' is a cornmission OT OTTence. ne was ropeu in, a& aii rnemDers OT in^ Leamea counsei Tunnef argu^s aiiegea 10 nave laKen piace, 11 ana tne aiiegauons are vaflu^ suDmiis uiai suDjeciing ine p| Drougni aDoui uy ine prosecuiij iaw. On the other hand, iearn^d uourt to ine contenis of tne hirf oantosn Kurriar. unanoana ail cornpiainant anu other relativesl statsd about the aileged ciimi?| su&i'nits that if the sntire case cannot be said that ingredients 323 read with Section 34 of I.P.t ror me peiitioner. I'anel Lawyer for the Stats. |on 4B^ L'r.r-'.L'. niea Tor quasriinH 'riK aaiefl fiied berore the Chief Judicia) nfiagisirate in peutio'nei' arguec) irial tne petiiioner tias toee'n liainant — Srrrt. Privanka Bhattacnarva. He 'i^ovemrnent Servant and at the time of aiieged pischaryfny his uuties, yet his narne has been Tarnliy of the husbanu 'have been irnpjicated. that the rnanner jn which the inciu&nt is |s clear that the petitioner has no roie to Dlav and general In nature. Leamed counssi ititioner to prosecuBon on such a mateiial pn, wouiu amouni 10 aouse or me Rrocess 01 counsei for ths State draws attention 01 this anu case oiary statemerits or iirnt.- i-TrvanKa. d Trishasen Sharma and suboriits that the J.-i^ wno were present at tne iiiTie OT inciaent nave ai act on the uart of th®"i w}T tne prosecution is taKen on its tace vaius, 11 bf the aiieged offence under Section 452, 294, '. are noi tTiaoe cui. LQQITSSQ couns'&s TUunet' Bi' XI-HC—78 311^1-^I ftqNT ^TT3TT^?T'3?tffE?T ^ ~5:sf '<ii<<ici<i, ynl'y'Ko, f»icii-H'j,< ." ,.^7^'m,te, - i^o. ^-Z'!/IV *<tNMl «>*ll<*» """'"" 7'"""""""""""""""W^ 200 sn^r 'v^v (Tjpfgsf^r) WIW ^ifel Sil^i -5 ar£iues that the assertion that peiTCiirtiiriy nis Quiy, is riiS aeTen A readiny uf FiR and cas ;i\uiuar.,- i->nan,uan.a ariu i nsnas' incident.'apuiicarrt accornpanied that tne DetTti'orier aiong vy'ith oti nouss wiei auempi vvas rnaue house anu in that urocess, scul ine goous Kepi in ine nouse <ve| accusea persons nuriea aDuses| the compiainant-privanka, S.i ne 'was not present at tne spot anu vvas ts 'wnich cannot be considered at this stase. fe dlarv staterrients of Srnt. Privanka, Santosh fen Sharrna 'woulu show that on fne uate of csumii Esnaitacnarya ano ii nas oeen aiiegea per co-accuseu oersons. loreiDiv eniereG ine fu Toreiuiy rernove rne cornpiainani rrom me £>narrnasnows cenain iniurv aisi ii is noi a case 'w'nere ini raco vsiuu, no inlQirecii6nis QT Vvhether the appiicauon has b^ couiu ue a maiier 01 aeTence Tfli nppiyiny me pnncipies laiu uo'w ui naiv<*?ia aria Oineis v. ir; ouDrBHie^.uourt ^ases •3SB cji.iasning'ertrHinai proceeuings ^ Aucuiuingly, the petiuori js rnau.e. ciear that whatever ob| purpese OT exarninirty as 10 -wn| 482 of Cr.F.C. is made out. T ooserv'aiiuns vmiie exarniriinu ir( ^>iai[<n<Hi TnT^if ^ffi^ '(.F>f^i< ^siRraaii^'i [Tie TOOK piace. ii nas aiso ueen aiiegea inai 'e aesu'oyeu ana ine peiiiioner ana oiner co- The rnedical report shovying exarninauun uf <.onsKfauony, fVsaonumsia anu i ns'nQsen ip entire case OT ine prosecutioi'! taKen on its ne uTrence nas Deen aiietieu or maQe oui. u^sn faiseiy impllcated as aiso a piea of aiiui the petitionei' uUiing the course of the'triai. 1 uv ins ou'orerne t-.oun in ine case OT oiaie HBaian t-at anu uineEs, s»;i?^ ^up^ieBEieisiai'v i, 1 s.rn not Inclined to hold that a cass f< i triis staoe is rnaue oui. |S QISr'fiiSSeO. oQTOif'9 Dai'lEHLj 'wllH uiis case, ii servations are rnade, are oniy for the iimited iiner ine case lor inienergnce ui'iaer oecuun ie iua! ^oufL SH8is nui oe iHisuenceci GV ine e Quiii OT ine aopijcani. (Aan1 sdl:Shnv^stava , lAoha" ndra l"^dge