g5 HIGH COURT OF CHTIR HATSGAH AT ‘BILA3PUR DB: Hon’ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra & Hon’ble Shri R.N. Cha‘ndrakar, J 1 Writ Appeal No. 31 of 2011 1 Appellant Vishnu Prasad iDhakate, S/o Sundarlalji (Petitioner) Dhakate, aged§ about 54 years, R/o Lokanshi Niwas, 1Sundar Nagar, Daganiya, Vivekanand Schéaol Road, Ward No; 59, Raipur, District Réipur (C.G.) Stae of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary, Rurai lndustnes' (Gramodyog) Handloom Sector DKS Bhawan Raipur District :Raipur (C G ) Dlrector, Handioom Directorate of Handloom, Ring Road No.1, Sonakhan Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Director, Handloom & Handicraft, Madhya Pradesh Directorate of'Handloom Shivaji Nagar Premises of Board of Secondary Education 2" Floor Bhopai Madhya Pradesh. Joint Director, Handloom, Madrhya radesh, Bhopal Director of Handloom Shivaji Nagar Premises of Board of Secondary Education 2" Floor Bhopal Madh' / Pradesh. Writ Appeal under Section 2 (1} of the Chhattisqarh Hiqh Court l (Appeal to DiVision Bench) Act 2006 Respondents ya, j f gur . gag Present: Shri Mano} Paranjape, counsel for the appellant. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. Advocate for the State. O R A L O R D E R (Passed on 11“ February, 201 1) - Per Dhirendra Mishra, J ‘ Heard. ‘ 1. Appellant-petitioner has preferted this apeal aainst the order dated 30th November, 2, ss in it titio . J. t P ya p g 010 paed Wr Pen (S) No 12 of 201 0, whereby while ‘aHowing he writ petition set aside the . .' order of termination of the petitioner i dated 29.1 2.2009 (Annexure P/1). Liberty has been reserved to tjhe State to take appropriate i (steps for canceilation of promotion of the petitioner after affording appropriate opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if so advised. While reserving the above liberty to the State certain observations have also been made? l . Learned counsel for'the appellant Submits that the appellant is - i aggrieved by the aforesaid observations and submits that'the instant writ appeal ,ma'y be disposed of with a direction to the State that while deciding the case of the promotion of the petitioner any adverse observations made in the impugned order may not influence and the matter should be strictly decided, in accordance‘with law and on its own merits. . Shri Bajaj, learned Govt. Advocate for the State has no objection if the instant appeal is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. . The instant writ appealris disposed of with direction to the State to decide the question ofr illegality“. of the promotion of the petitioner on its own merit without being'influenced by any \ adverse observations made in the impugned order. F" WV” 1 Sdl- Judge “\"\-\\\-s' * Dhirendra Sd/- Mishra i.H RANGANATH CHANDRAKAR l : '