'^ ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BiLASPUR Sinaie Benc'n Hon'ble Shri H.L. Dattu. CJ, Writ Petifion No.24S3 of 2002 Petitioner Respondents IVIiss Rashmi Nanda, D/o Shri Sushil Nanda, aged about 28 years, R/o Bastar Road, Risaipgra, Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari (CG) Throuah real brother and Special Power of Attomev:- Vikas Nanda, S/o Shri Sushil Nanda, aged about 26 years, R/o Bastar Road, Risaipara, Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari (CG) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - Collector Dhamtari (CG) 2. Deputy Collector, Mining Branoh, Raipur (C.G.)' 3. Deputy Coltector, Mining Branch , Dhamtari, Tah and Distt. - Dhamtari (CG) 4. , Sarpanch, Viilage Panchayat Amethi, Dhamtari (C.G.) Present : Shri V.G.Tamaskar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sanjay S. Agrawal, Government Advocate for the State. (Passed on 22Ild March, 2007) It appears that respondents had granted a mining lease to the petitioner Tor a period of two years from 23-12-2000 to 22-12-2002: The grievanoe of the petitioner before this Court is that the said mining lease has been cancelled by the respondents without any show cause notice to the petitioner and, therefore, it is stated that the said action of the respondents is arbitrary and illegal. (2) Since the lease period itseif as come to an end, at this stage, 1 need not go into the details or merits of the case. z (3) In the oiroumstance, the writ petition is disposed of as having become unnecessary. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum TOF any other grievances, if she has. Ordered aocordingly. Sd/- OuefJustice E^-"""