FARAD CONTINUTION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Misc Application no 67 of 2005 -------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office Court or Judge’s Order Memorandum of Coram appearence,Court’s Orders & Directors and Registrar’s Order --------------------------------------------------- Ms Sulbha A Dhamale for applicant Mr. A.A.Garge for respondent CORAM; A.M.KHANWILKAR J. CORAM; A.M.KHANWILKAR J. CORAM; A.M.KHANWILKAR J. DATED 2.2.2006 DATED 2.2.2006 DATED 2.2.2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. l. Hearing of this matter was deferred to facilitate the parties to explore the possibility of settlement. Both counsel have given their respective versions on the terms on which settlement can be reached. There is vast difference between the two offers made. In the circumstances it is obvious that the settlement is not possible. Accordingly the learned counsel were called upon to address on merits of the matter. The application was therefore considered on merits. 2. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and perusal of documents on record, I have no hesitation in accepting the prayer made in this application by the applicant-wife for transfer of the matrimonial proceedings in the court at Thane to the family court at Bandra,Mumbai. In the circumstances, in my opinion, for the reasons recorded in the application, which will have to be accepted; in the interest of justice application succeeds in terms of prayer clause (a). No order as to costs.