IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 13057 of 2008 Between: Suvignanam Trust Rep. by its Founder Acharya Sathya Veer, S/o. Narsaiah R/o. Narsapur , Medak District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Medak at Sanga Reddy, Medak. 3 The Tahsildar, Narsapur Mandal, Medak District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ or Order/s more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No. 2 & 3 in not implementing the Order dt. 11-4-08 in G.O.Ms.o. 590, Rev. (Assgn IV Dept) as being illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents No. 2 & 3 to deliver possession of the land admeasuring Ac 8.02 gts in Sy.No. 80/1PP and to pass such other order. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.B.VIJAYSEN REDDY Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.13057 of 2008 ORDER: Suvignanam Trust, a body that came into existence with an object of propagating vedic knowledge, moral values, auyurveda and yoga and meditation, was allotted an extent of Ac.3.38 guntas in survey No.80/1PP situated at Narsapur village on payment of market value of Rs.13,000/- per acre. As petitioner trust wanted some more land, they approached the Government for allotment of Ac.8.02 guntas in survey No.80/1PP. By orders in G.O.Ms.No.590, Revenue (Assignment IV) Department, dated 11.04.2008, Government ordered alienation of Ac.8.02 guntas in Narsapur village in favour of petitioner Trust at market value of Rs.13,000/- per acre. District Collector, Medak was directed to take further necessary action for payment of the cost and matters related therewith. The Government Order was not acted upon by respondents 2 and 3. Aggrieved by the same, petitioner approached this Court seeking a direction to respondents 2 and 3 to implement the order of Government and deliver possession of the land. A counter affidavit is filed. The case of the petitioner insofar as allotment of land by Government in two trenches is not denied. However, it is stated that the Government issued Memo No.23063/Assign.IV (1), dated 06.05.2008, directing second respondent to keep the orders in G.O.Ms.No.590, dated 11.04.2008, in abeyance until further orders. After hearing learned counsel for petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (Assignment), having regard to the fact that Government kept their orders in abeyance, direction cannot be issued to District Collector or the Tahsildar to implement the orders of Government. The petitioner is given liberty to approach the Government with a request to withdraw the abeyance orders. As and when such application is filed, the same shall be considered by Government. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. _______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 25.11.2008 pln