IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31725 of 2007 ARVIND KUMAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 6. 7.7.2008 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation is that 5,86,065/-rupees was looted from „Sahara India‟ Bank, Bihariganj. During the investigation, it appears that since the occurrence has taken place near a Tea Stall and the owner of the said Tea Stall and others have disclosed the name of this petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the name “Arvind” has been disclosed without giving alias name and it would be appear from the statement of the Supervising Officer that Awadhesh Mandal , Pintoo Yadav, Manoj Yadav and Arvind Mukhiya are the criminals of the area who were responsible for the said occurrence. The petitioner is in custody since 10.12.2006 for almost 18 months. Considering the fact that only material against the petitioner is that he is suspected as Arvind Mukhiya and he has a clean antecedent, except that he is involved in one case in which litigation is going on between the petitioner and his own Gotias, I direct that the petitioner Arvind Kumar Yadav should be released on bail on - 2 - furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J. M., Madhepura in connection with Bihariganj P. S. Case No. 44 of 2006 with the condition that one of the bailors should be a close relative of the petitioner . U.K. (Sheema Ali Khan,J)