IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 22ND MAY 2009 / 1ST JYAISHTA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 179 of 2009(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.20497/2007 Dated 15/02/2008 .................... PETITIONER(S): ADDITIONAL PETITIONERS 2 TO 4 -------------------------------------------- 1. SAKKU BHAI, D/O.K.DAS, AGED 60, MADAPURAKKAL, KARUVATTA.P.O,HARIPAD, ALAPPUZHA. 2. JANAMMA, D/O.K.DAS, AGED 51,SREERUDA, SANATHANAM WARD, KAITHAVANA, ALAPPUZHA. 3. D.SHAJI, S/O.K.DAS, AGED 49,THURITHICAD, MUHAMMA.P.O, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.J.OM PRAKASH RESPONDENT(S): 1ST RESPONDENT ----------------------------- MADHUKAR GUPTHA,WORKING AS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI. ADV. SRI..S. KRISHNAMOORTHY, ACGSC THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C.O.(C) No.179 of 2009 - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 22nd day of May, 2009. JUDGMENT Heard Shri S. Krishnamoorthy, learned Additional Central Government Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents also. 2. It is submitted that the directions contained in the judgment have been implemented. In the light of the fact that the directions have been complied with, no further action is called for in this Contempt of Court Case. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents pointed out that the legal representatives as such cannot have any independent right for grant of monthly pension in accordance with the scheme. It is true that under the scheme, the entitlement of the legal representatives is only for the arrears and not for continued payment of the pension. The same is clarified and the Contempt of Court Case is closed. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/