H!GH CDURT 6F cHHATTISGARH AT EILASPUR Writ Petition (M227) No.6436 of 2911 Peéitioner Jamuna Bai wdio Late Gajpati Defendant NGA Chandra, aged abeut 72 years, 1" Occupatian-Cultivatianfhouse-wife, Rm village‘Pest Baipur. Tahsil’ Biiaigarh, Distx'ici Raipur (CG) r Versus Respcna‘ents ‘i. Champa Bai Dio Late Gaipati Plaintiff Chandra, w/e Shri Tu!si Prasad Chandra, aged abou: 62 years, 4‘ Occupation Agricuiturist/Housewife. Rio viilage & Post 'Dadaedih‘ poat Chhotekhaita. Tahsii Samngarh‘. ‘Dismct Raigar'n (C.G.) 2. Ambika Bai wd/o Late Roop Narayan Chandra, aged about 69 years, Occupation Agriculturelhouaewife! Rio \ft!!age+ Post Ealpur. Tahsi! Bilaigarh. Eisirict Raipu: (6.6.). 3efandants 3. Chameii Die iate Gajpati Chandra wd/o Resham La! Chanéra. aged. about 57 years, Occupation Agriculturefhousewife. RIG Viliage+ Pest Katékoni, Tahsii Dabhra, Disirici Janjgir—Champa (CG). 4. Hem Kurnari Dio iate Gajpati Chandra. wig $hri Duieshwar Chandra. aged about 42 years, Occupation Agriculturelhousewife, Rio Village+ Pest Kosir Bade,‘—Tahsii Sarangar'n. District Raigarh (C.G.) Aii are presentiy residing at Madhubanpara, Raigarh. Fest + Disirict Raigarh (6.6.) 5. Jagciish Chandra $Io Late Narbae‘a ‘ Chandra, aged about 60 years, 6. Taniram S/o Late Narbada Chandra, aged about 55 years. Gaya Prasad Slo Late Narbada Chandra. aged about 50 years, Respondents Ne.5 to 7 are Rie viiiage + Post Baipur. Taheii Bilaigarh. Diatrict Rarpur (Ce) Padma Bai D/o Late Narbada Chandra, w/o Baleshwar Chandra, aged about 4?. years, Rlo viiiage — Kosir Bade, Tahsii Sarangaih, (C.G.), -2; At present residing at Badal Mahai (Rajmaxay Chewk. Raigaih‘) Pe5t + Tahsii District Raigarh (QGJ Kumar Singh $19 Late sukhru Chandra, aged about 57 years, Rio vmage + Posf Balpur Tahsil Bilaiqarh Dlstnc: Rama! (C C ) Smt Manjhah Ba! w/c qhn Chhate Lai Chandra {3’0 We $uPhru uhardra! aged about 58 years, Rio viliage + Post Jaijaipur (Gautiya Chowk), Poiice Station + . TahSil Jaijaipur, District Janjgir-Champa (CK?) 10. 11. $mt.i{umeri wla Shri Chhote La] Chanda—z, Die iaie Sukhru Chandra: aged about 54 yeag's, Rio viiiage + Past Lakhoii. Poiice $taticn—$aragacn. District Janjgir~Champa (C.G.) Smt.Gyan Bai w/o Shri \frrendre Chandra. Dfo late Sukhru Chandra, aged abcut 52 years. Rio viliage —- Kanwalpur, Pest - Sukhapali. Felice Station + Tahsii—Dabhra DistJanjgir— Champa (C11) Rudranarayen (Shandre $16 Shobhnath Chandra, aged about 30 yeare, Rie viiiage + Pest Kansa, Police Station + Tahsii—Dabhra, Dietrict Janjgir-Chempe (C.G.). Medni Chandra Sm Shobhnath Chandra, aged abeut 25 years. Rie viiiage + Post - Karma, Felice Station + Tahsil — Dabhra, District Janjgir— Champa {CG}. Smtiteera Bai wie Kripal Singh, aged about 4D yeam, Rie village —— Qdekera, Tahsi! Jaljaipur, Dietrict Janjgir- Champa (C5,). Yadram Sic Tijram, caete Satnami, aged about 52 years, Qccupation— Agricuiture, R/e viilage Bhadre, Pest —- Pasid, Tahail Sarangarh, Distriet Raigarh (C.G.) 14. 15. 16. Hariram Sic Baiga, caete $atnami, aged aboet 53 years, occupatiort- _ Agriculture, Rio village Bhadra, Post — Paeid, Tahsil Sarangarh, Bistrict Raigarh (CIR) Mame} $i‘0 Bedhan Chandra, aged about 8Q years, Qccupation- Agriculture, Rio viliage + Poet Baipur, 13. - Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Raipur (C,G.)x Guhru‘ S/o Chamru caste Satnami, aged about 54 years, Occupaticn -— Agriculture, Rio village + Poet Baipur, Tahsii Biiaigarh, Disuict Raipur (C63). 20. State cf Chhattisgarh, through Ccilectoa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). ONrit Petition ander Articie 227 of the Constitutisn of india} Mr.A.P.$harma, counse! fer the petitioner. MLAkhii Agrawai. Pane! Lawyer fcr res‘pendent No.20/State. ($3: Hon‘bie Mr. T.P. Shanna, i.) ORDER ,(1 5-1 1—261 1) 1. By thi5 writ petitioh unéer Articie 227 of the Ccnstituticn of mdia’ the petitioner has chaHenged the legahty and propriety 9f the order 27.4.2011 paseed by the Civii Judge Class-1!. Bhetgaon, merrier Raipur, in Civil Suit No.124—Af2007, whereby right to fiie written etaiement of the petiiioneridefendant No.4 has been ciosed. 2. i have heard ieerned couneei for the petitioner, perused the order impugned and other documents fiied on 'oehait of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that without tiiing written statement the petitioner wouici not be in a position to defend herself and opportunity wouio' be just and proper to file written statement. Learned couneei further submits that in absence of written statementispeoifio defence in‘suit for deciaration, partition, possession and mesne profit, right of the petitionerfoiefendant No.4 would be seriousiy prejudiced. Case has fixed for framing of the issuee and case is stiii in initial stage. 4. Considering the aforesaid fact. issuance of notice to nineteen respondents wouid be futile ex roise and observance wouid serve the purpose. 5. Consequentiy. the writ petition is aliowed and the order impugned is modified‘to the extent indicated subject to payment of cost of Rs.29001- to respondent No.1!piaintifi within 15 days from today before the Court beiow. One opportunity of filing written statement is provided to the petitioner. The petitioner shalt file written statement within 20 days from todaij. ‘ Sd/— T.P. Sharma Judge \.