THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.1194 OF 2001 ORDER: 1 The order dated 04.07.2001 made in C.C.No.2253 of 1999 by the learned XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad is questioned in this revision. The said order reads as under: “Complainant called absent. A.1 to A.4 present. Advocate for accused submitted that since one year the complainant is not producing any evidence. There is no representation for complainant. In the above circumstances in the absence of evidence and material against accused and for default of complainant to produce evidence, I found no material to charge the accused. Hence A.1 to A.4 are discharged.” 2 This revision is admitted on 12.02.2002. However, as notices on the respondents / accused were not served, this court on 11.11.20099 directed the petitioner to furnish the correct address of the respondents 3 and 4 before 09.12.2009 and further observed that if the petitioner fails to furnish the correct addresses, this revision against respondents 3 and 4 stands dismissed. Despite the same no details of the respondents were furnished. 3 Thus, in the light of the said order dated 11.11.2009 of this court this revision is dismissed against the private respondents and it remains only against the State. Since no relief can be granted against the State, which is a formal party, this revision is dismissed. -------------- Kvsn 08.07.2010