IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1147 of 1992 Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED R.KHOJA:GULBANU RAMJANBHAI KHOJA Versus RAMANBHAI ASHABHAI DESAI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR SP HASURKAR for Petitioners MR BS PATEL for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT Date of decision: 03/12/1999 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. Learned counsel for the respondents appearing on behalf of Mr. B.S. Patel states that he has received instructions in writing from the respondent that the petitioner in the present revision (who is the tenant of the suit premises) has already vacated the suit premises. It would, therefore, appear that the present revision has now become infructuous. The revision is accordingly disposed of and rule is discharged with no order as to costs. It is, however, clarified that the interim relief granted in the revision shall continue to operate upto 30th December 1999 to enable learned counsel for the petitioner to verify the situation. Liberty to apply for revival of the revision, if necessary, upto 30th December 1999. *********