IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.516 of 2006 KANHAIYA LALL son of late Fagu Lal, resident of village Rudrapur, P.O. Rudrapur, via Haddi, District-Ballia Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through Additional Director Irrigation Research Institute, Govt. of Bihar at Khagaul, Patna. 2. The Director Provident Fund, Directorate, Pant, Bhawan, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Assistant Direcotr, Provident Fund, Directorate, Pant Bhawan, Bihar, Patna. 4. The District Provident Fund Officer, Patna. ----------- 4 22.02.2010 Heard Mr. Brij Mohan Kumar singh learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Anil Kumar Jha, learned Government Advocate No.2 for the State. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the District Provident Fund, Patna enclosing the calculation sheet showing the deduction and calculation of interest towards a provident fund. A reasoned order is placed at Annexure-A of the counter affidavit being memo No. 1300 dated 10.02.2010 whereby upon reconsideration of the matter by the Assistant Director, Provident Fund it has been found that as the deductions were at a rate of less than 12.5% hence the calculation of interest is at the rate of 10.5% and the petitioner was not entitled interest @ 12.5% for the aforesaid 2 reason. As already observed the calculation chart has also been enclosed with the affidavit. In the aforesaid circumstances no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending. The petitioner if so advised and if he feels aggrieved by the order as contained in Annexure-A series and/or by the calculation made by the authorities as enclosed with the affidavit, may file his representation before the respondent No.4, the District Provident Fund Officer, Patna with supportive calculation details and which shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law within a period of three months from receipt of such representation. The writ petition is disposed of. Bibhash (Jyoti Saran, J. )