IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 28TH JULY 2011 / 6TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 20676 of 2011(H) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- KIRAN S.KUMAR, S/O.SUDARSANA KUMAR, KARIMPANNOOR HOUSE, PULLAD P.O., THIRUVALLA. BY ADVS. SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND, SMT.V.AJITHA, SMT.K.RAJANI. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PIN – 686 560. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, OFFICE OF THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM, PIN – 686 560. 3. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, OFFICE OF THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM, PIN – 686 560. R1 TO R3 BY SRI. T.A. SHAJI, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/07/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.20676/2011-H: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE CHALAN DTD. 20/07/2011. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF REMITTANCE OF FEES FOR THE REVALUATION OF 3RD SEMESTER PAPER NAMELY ELECTRICAL TECHNOLOGY. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF REMITTANCE OF FEES FOR THE REVALUATION OF 5TH SEMESTER PAPER NAMELY APPLIED ELECTRO MAGNETIC THEORY ON 18/04/2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. Prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 20676 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the 8th Semester examination was declared, he had failed in one paper. He applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 6 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 3rd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/-