i*- jii", i.iiilk,, l;8iit!sl '10:123 HIGH COliBT OF CHHA.TTI8GARH AT BILASPTJR giBS^ija PETITIONER (WK Writ Petition No. 2815 of2003 Dashratli Kalo, S/o Sivi Kliakhsa, aged about 64 years, R7o village Daltoli, P.0. Konpara, Tah. Kunkuri, Distt. Jashpur (CG). 'V7ERSUS 1. The State of ClAattisgarli, tlirough tlie Secretary, Department of Panchayat & Social Welfare Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. Collector, Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (CG). 3. Sub Director Panchayat & Social Welfare Departnieut, Raigarh(CG). 4. Sarpancli, Vilalge Paaehayat Koapara, Vikas Khand, Distt.Jashpur(CG). PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITl-mON OF INDIA) CSB: Hon'We Mr. Satisli K. Aeiuhote-i. J.t Smt. Renu Kochar, Advocate for the petitionei'. Shri V.V.S. Moorthy, Deputy Advocate General forthe State. O) '2.', (Passed on 07th ofFebraan', 2WS8) <y tliis petitioii, the petitioner, who has retired from service on 30.06.1996, is clauning retiral benefits. Leamed counse! appearing for the petitioner submit that on 19.06.2006 iii W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Si-nt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Govenunent of Chhattisgarh and ofhers), this Court passed the following order: ".....!n tuni, the A.G. Office is getting incorrect iiifon'nation and not ab!e to give authority ietter at fhe tmie ofretirement ofan employee, tlierefore, a committee consisting offollowing officers is constituted: (1) Speeial Secretary (Finance), (Chainiian), (2) Any ofBcer of the raiik of Additional Secretary of Law Departmeiit, (Member), (3) Director, Treasury, Accounts and Petision, (Member), (4) Deputy Accountant General (Funds), (Member), (5) Joiat Secrefary (General A_dminigtration Department, State of Chhattisgarh), (Mefflber ciim Secretary)" ::;- ^-y <:.i.- '^s<«BMi!. ^;^. .i^^^^^s^ 5S» (3) Leamed counsel appearuig for flie respondents submit that pureuaiit to the above order a Conmiittee, consisting ofthe above-stated officers has been constituted to look into the gievances ofthe retired employees, iii respect ofretiral dues. (4) Leamed counsel appearing for the State farther submit that the said Connmttee is in existence and all fhe dispute, raised by the petitioner in tliis petition, may be decided by the said higli power Comiiiittee, within prescnbed tune. (5) In this petition, the disputed question offacts with regard to the retiral dues (supra) are involved, which camiot be decided by this Court, as the disputed questions of facte can be resolved by the higli power coniiiiittee (supra) in consultation with the retired employee and the concemed officers. Tlius, I ani of the coasidered opinion that it would be just and expedient to direct the above Coinmitfee, so constituted, fo look into the disputes aiid pass appropriate orders, in accordacce witli !aw. (6) Accordingly, t!ie office ofthe Advocate Geiieral is directed to send the case to the Comimttee, within a period of 15 days froni the date of receipt of a copy of fliis order. Thereafter, tiie Committee shall issue notiee to the aggrieved retired employee and the ofBcers concerned, within a farther period of 15 dai/s. Tlie Cormmttee shall consider and pass order, iii aceordance wifli !aw, after affording proper opportuiiity of hearing to the employee. The employee concemed and the officers concemed may fi!e additiona! (iocuments, ifiiecesgary. The entire exercise, includmg payinent ofretiral dues (supra), ifany, to the petitioner, be compieted withiii a period offour montlTs from the date ofreceipt ofaeopy ofthis order. (7) In view ofthe foregoing, the petition is disposed of No order asto costs. S.SEl Sd/- Satish K. Agaiiiotri Judge