IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.6047 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:04.02.2011. Davinder Kaur and others ...Petitioners Versus Gulshan Kumar ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Arun Bakshi, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Sudhir Paruthi, Advocate, for the respondent. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 25.08.2010 passed by the learned Rent Controller, Jalandhar by which provisional rent has been assessed on the ground that the petitioners have admitted the rent at the rate of `2,000/- per month. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that in an earlier Eviction Application No.35/09 dated 17.07.2008 titled as `Gulshan Kumar Vs. Davinder Kaur and others' between the same parties in respect of the same property, the learned Rent Controller had assessed the provisional rent at the rate of `1,000/- per month and in the subsequent eviction petition, i.e. the present case, which was decided on 25.08.2010, rate of rent has been fixed on the admission of the petitioners to the tune of `2,000/- per month, though there is no such admission on record. Learned counsel for the respondent could not point out the alleged admission which has been taken into consideration by the learned Rent Controller at the time of passing of the impugned order. In view of the above, the impugned order is patently illegal, perverse and unsustainable in the eyes of law. Hence, the present revision petition is allowed and the impugned order is set aside. The matter is remanded back to the learned Rent Controller to assess the provisional rent afresh in accordance with law. The parties, through their learned counsel, are directed to appear before the learned Rent Controller on 23.02.2011. February 04, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE