:^';,1'';.^1^' IN THE HIGH COURT OFJXJDI^TUREiATBILASPORtC.G; WRIT PETITION N0. t5L3 /3006 PETITIONER \ ••.,^ .·^ii^...·4?J·'^ •^ ^/^'w""^-' ^<^^y^ V ^i^P^"' .-•"" <? •••^s^>- "^' 1^-:"'" ;Y?-1 • • -•' 1PONDENTS Dr. S.K.S. Gaharwar, S/o. Late Shri D.S. Gaharwar, Aged about 51 years, Vet^rinary Assistant Surgeon, I/c. Veterinary Hospital, Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS //1. / 2. 3. State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Principal Secretary, Department of Agriculturg (Veterinary), Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director, Veterinary Services Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) Deputy Director, Veterinary Services, Raigarh (C.G.) WMTL ^'ETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE OONSTITUTION QF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI. PROHIBITION AND FOR OTHER SmTABLEWRIT OR WRITS. ORDER OR ORDERS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. "—sw 1/ XI-HC-22 Sfl^I^I f?;1Pli'SII^I grtiwgfei •33( 'WWt, sSiSiWW, ^"tra^M ,„., i . c ^.n': to^', ^3fofc. n^jofc, 4 ^^/oi, -••-•-•^-•-•^ao' ., ' an^T.TRnw^HfN •qiN?Rt;T TTORff •?'ft<?> •<te?R ^; 3if5<n sa^? W.R.No.'i 313/2t)06,1314/2006 & 1315?200e 34-2006 Shri Manindra Shriv^stava, Sr. Advocate with Shri Ashish Shrivasfava, counsel for the p^titioners. Shri Syshii Dubey, Qovt. Advocate fbr the State. Bythis common order^/.P.No.1313QOOB, 1314SOJ6& 1315/2008 shail be disposed of. Heard. The petitioners were ^ppointed as Members of the Technical Committee vide order dated 21r-1.-2005for vaccination and examination of various animais under the sp^cial scheme for distribution of animals to theweaker sections of the ^ociety bythe State oif.Chhattisgarh. The petitioners' job was to check u the heaith or the-animajs. tt done by the petitionersand th^t was done bytHe other orficiais underthe supervistoft of J&int Director/ DJBputy Director. Shri Shrivastava, leaijnea senior counsei appearing for the petitioners, contended that ti' order is wioiiy arbrtrary. Le^ on 8-2-2006 as per Anne; W.P.No.1314/2006) submitteo submitted his representation .contended that whiie issuing i) the medicai fjtness and matters reiated to is contended that distribution job was not e suspension order was passed on the ground that the petitipners h^d committed iiiegaiity and irreguiarity Jn distribution, bufthatwasnott^ejob ofthepetitionere and the suspension rned counsel contended that.Dr. S.K.S. Gaharwar (pentioner in W.P.hjo. 1313/2006) submitted his representation ture-P/9, Dr. D.K. Patei (petjtioner in his representation on 8-2-2006 as per Annexure-P/9 & Dr. B.L. ^3upta (petitioner jn W.P.No.1315f2006) f>n 20-2-2006 as per Annexure-P/9. it is notice by this Court on 27-3-2006 fte '•qt^tfe^ [I-HC-22 an^iqif ' R-IW SIllRl giHwgfto 6 Gowri yy"1' •Qv' \^ ^ Y ^a^'siTsTRPi, •iSiiii'y'is, feTOy B\^jo^ ^ ^'r|^ 20® ' . ' . sn^i ¥RHW^TI -z- respondents were directed to ^Nfepft^ •cm?ff^ ft^t'Tf^n?R: ^3l{igti3nin submit the reply by 3-4-2006 and in the meantime it was also direc(ed to decide tlie representation of the. petjtioners. it is pointed out t -representation has been decid^d by the respondent authorities. On the other hand, Shri Siate, cohtended that if the reipresentations submitted by the petitioners are not decided the samewilt t)e deGided within a period often days. Haying considered an<) merits ofthe case, in the opi^iion cifthis Court, ends of justiee wiil be served if a direction is given t<t the petitioners to make statutory appeals within a period of five days competent authorjty and on any grievance still remains,the| Copy to State counsel. :hat neither the reply has been fiiea nor Dubey, learned counsel appearing forthe without expressing any opinion on the from the Oateof th'is order before the such siatutory appeal being fiied, the competent authorjty shall d^ciae the same on its own merits in accordancevvith law as early ajs possiblepreferablywithina period often days from the date of recetpit 41 statutory appeai. it is made ciear thatif petitioners mayavailtheremedyavaiiable undertheiaw. With theaforesaid obs^n/ations and directions the writ petitions No.1313/2006,1314Q006 & 1^15/2006 stand disposed of. Consequentiy, pending ^ppiications, if any^alsostand disposed of. Copy ofthis order be [^iaced on the record ofwrit petitioris No. 1313/2006,1314/2006 & 1315^006. Certined copy as per rul^s. Sd/- Fakhmddin Judge ^Tt^'^rt