HIGH COURT OF CHHATTESGARH AT BILASPUR . Writ Petition (An.227m&.S352_Gfl010 PetitiGrter . Diirga Prasad AgrawaE S/o. Shri AppIJcant Kishan Lal Agrawal, aged about 52 ysars, Occupation ~ Vyavsay, R/o. VIJIage Pendra, P.S. Pendra, Dist.Bilaspur (C.G.) Respondents Non-ap-pjscants t1 \/er^u3 1. Krishna S/o. Shri Tajju Slngh Gond, R/Q. Nevasa Bartoia. P.S. Pendra Road Gaureia, Dlstt.BllaspurC.G. 2. Ramesh Chandra Agrawai R/o Murljdhar Bhagwan Das maln road Psndra Road Gaureia, P.S.'Gaureia, Pendra Road Distt.Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. The Orjontai Insurance Company Limited Bllaspur, Distt.Bilaspur (C.G.) CWrit Petltion under Artlcie 227 of the Constitutlon of tndia) Mr.Yogendra Chaturvedi, counsol for the petitlonor, Nono prosent for rospondents No.1 and 2. Mr.Raj Awasthy, counsel for respondont No.3< (SB: Hon'bie Mr. T.P. Sharma, J.) (Passedon 14-7-2011) 1. By thls petition undsr Article 227 of the Constltutlon of India th©petltloner has challenged the EegaEity and propriety of the order dated 23.10.2010 (Annexure P/1) passed by the AddlSionaE EVtotor Accldent Ciaims Tribunal, Pona'ra Road in Ciasm Cass No.36/09, whereby right to adduce the evldence of the petltioner has been dosed by the Trsbunal on the ground that ampls opportunsties have been provlded to hlm for adduclng the evidencs and the Tribunal has fixed ths case for evidence of the respondents. 2. ASer some srguments, • iearned counsel for the petitioner frankly admlts that the petitioner was not serious about his case. Learned counsel further submits that in caso he would not be permitted to lead the evldonce he may ioss hls aii rights and remedies. 3. On the other hand, iearned counsei for respondent. No.3 opposesthe petitton and submits that ampie opportunitlos have been glven .to tho petltloner and '•'-•-••^^••''•ss'sxs-ssssfs.y ^- tho Tnbunal has rightiy ciosod the opportunity to adduce tho ovjdence of the petitiorEer. 4, On due considoration, especsaisy the fact that this is a ciaim case and the Court v^as requlred to'tako llborai view and doos not approach as injured porson, the order impugned is modified to the extcnt and has directed that tho Tribunai shali provido two opportunities wlthin Interval of 15 days from 10.82011 to the petJtlonor and docide the case on its own merits as per law. 5.. The petstion §s disposed of accordja^gjy. The partles are directed to remaln prosent boforo the Claims Tribunal cn 10.8»2011. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge fc< ^