1 AO-474-10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 474 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 616 OF 2010 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 611 OF 2008 IN L.C.SUIT NO. 585 OF 2008 Priyadevi Anantrai Padwal ... Appellant Vs. Mumbai Municipal Corporation ... Respondents Mr.P.D.Deogirikar i/b. Ms. A.S.Malwankar, Advocate, for the appellant. Smt. K.K.Soran, Advocate for the respondents. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 27th October, 2010. P.C. 1. The appellant, who is the original plaintiff, has preferred this Appeal against refusal of ad-interim relief, pending the Notice of Motion. 2. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 3. The learned Counsel for the respondent-Corporation makes a statement that occupation of 39 tenements is already given and 7 more tenements 2 AO-474-10.sxw are ready for handing over. Certain structures are required to be demolished for the purpose of construction of an over-bridge. 4. Taking into consideration the circumstances, I do not find it necessary to interfere in the impugned order. Therefore, the Appeal stands dismissed with the following directions :- The respondents shall file reply within four weeks from this day and the trial Court shall dispose of Notice of Motion No.611/2008 within four weeks thereafter. 5. As the Appeal itself is disposed of, the Civil Application does not survive and stands disposed of accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)