IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1651 of 2009 1. RAM BILAS MANDAL S/O LATE DUKHI MANDAL R/O VILL JAMUA TOLA, P.S. THARI, DISTT- SIRHA(NEPAL) Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR ----- 7/ 04.02.2010 Heard. Some mistake rather irregularity, has been committed by the trial court in fixing the case for hearing on the point of cognizance otherwise it is admitted case that charge-sheet is submitted within stipulated period required for its submission. Whenever charge-sheet is seen or perused, that is the cognizance and a mistaken prayer was made by the learned Special P.P. to hear on the point of cognizance after submission of charge- sheet and that is allowed, entitles no relief to the petitioner. What remains to be taken into consideration that to avoid any controversy, process should be issued to proceed in the case. Petitioner is in custody so there is no need to issue separate notices or summonses or warrant and only formal observation is sufficient. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this application is dismissed. ( Mandhata Singh, J ) BTiwary/