IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9229 of 2009 LALAN KUMAR SINGH S/O SHIR NATHUNI SINGH R/O VILLAGE-BISHUNPUR, PS-BARUN DISTT-AURANGABAD- --------------------PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE CHIEF ELECTION OFFICER, BARRACK NO.11, OLD SECRETARIATE,PATNA 3. THE BIHAR STATE ELECTION AUTHORITY, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY BARRACK NO.11 OLD SECRETARIATE 4. THE DEPUTY SECY.B.S.E.A, BARRACK NO.11 OLD SECRETARIATE 5. THE PRINCIPAL SECRY. FINANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR,PATNA 6. THE PRINCIPAL SECY.,CO-OPERATIVE DEPATT.GOVT. OF BIHAR 7. THE REGISTRAR,CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,BIHAR,PATNA 8. THE JOINT REGISTRAR,CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, MAGADH DIVISION, GAYA 9. THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE OFFICER, AURANGABAD 10. THE B.D.O.BARUN,DISTT- AURANGABAD 11. SHIR MANTU KUMAR, S/O SHIR BINDA SINGH, VILL- JANGI BIGHA, PO- SADURI KARMA, PS- BARUN,DISTRICT- AURANGABAD-----------------------RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2 4.8.2009 After having heard learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State Election Commission, the petitioner has liberty to urge and raise all his objections before the State Election authority or else he has to wait for declaration of the final result. Since the election process has already been initiated and the final notification has been issued, the Court is not willing to exercise any authority under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is no occasion for filing any objection before the respondent authority because one objection has already been filed but no action has been taken. In this regard the Court can only observe that the respondent State Election Commission is duty bound to hold election in free and fair manner in accordance with law. - 2 - This writ application is dismissed with the above direction/observation. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)