(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5170 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5170 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5170 OF 2005 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 13 OF 2004 FIRST APPEAL NO. 13 OF 2004 FIRST APPEAL NO. 13 OF 2004 Municipal Corporation of the City of Pune ...Applicant Versus Shri. Suresh Bhalchandra Durve and Others ...Respondents ..... Shri. R.G. Ketkar, counsel for the Applicant Respondent No.2 is present in person. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED: 5TH DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 5TH DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 5TH DECEMBER, 2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant and the Respondent No.2 who is present in person. Perused the Civil Application. For the reasons stated in the Civil Application, sufficient cause is made out. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide. Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b). Place the aforesaid First Appeal No. 13 of 2004 for final hearing on 07.12.2005. *****