CWP(T) No. 5889 of 2008 21.6.2010 Present: Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate, vice counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Verma Advocate, vice counsel for the respondent. According to Mr. Rajesh Verma, learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent the matter in issue is squarely covered by a decision rendered by this Court in CWP(T) No. 6044 of 2008, titled as Smt. Geeta Sharma versus The Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation Ltd., decided on May 3, 2010. Copy of the same is taken on record. According to him the petitioner was working as a Junior Assistant and higher pay scale which was given to the petitioner was subsequently directed to be reduced on the decision taken by the Government. The consequential correction of the pay scale and refixation of the same is based on the decision taken by the Government with which no fault can be found. There is no dispute that payments were made in terms of the higher pay scale fixed by the Government and petitioner had no role in fixation thereof. In Geeta Sharma (supra) this Court had directed the respondent not to recover the excess amount already disbursed to the petitioner. The issue in question being same and similar as such the respondents are directed not to recover the amount in terms of order dated 24.5.1999 (Annexure A-1). 2. With the aforesaid observations the present petition stands disposed of. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. June 21, 2010 (PK)