IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.460 of 2007 Aziz Fatma Versus Special Officer Sasaram Munica ----------- 8. 12.09.2011 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. The present revision application has been filed against the order dated 07.02.2007 passed by Additional Sub Judge VI, Sasaram in Title Suit No.235/1997 by which the learned court below has allowed the prayer of the defendant no.1 and has dismissed the suit as barred for non-compliance of the provisions of Section 80 C.P.C. and/or Section 377 of Municipal Corporation Act. It appears that this revision application is not maintainable in view of the proviso to Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure the effect of which has already discussed in a bench decision of this Court in Shiv Shakti Coop. Housing Society, Nagpur Vs. Swaraj Developers and others, reported in (2003)6 Supreme Court Cases 659 and Surya Dev Rai Vs. Ram Chander Rai and others, reported in (2003)6 Supreme Court Cases 675 as 2 well as by a Division Bench of this Court in Durga Devi Vs. Vijay Kumar Poddar, reported in 2010(2) PLJR 954. In this view of the matter, the petitioner is permitted to convert this revision application into an application Under Article 227 of the Constitution of India within four weeks, failing which this application shall stand rejected without further reference to the bench. Nitesh ( V. Nath, J.)