^\e<\ ' \^vvv HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. WRIT PETITION (C l No.5321 of 2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 1 Arihant Electricals ( A Private Limited Company), having its Registered Office at 24/4866, Ansari Road, Darya Ganj, New Delhi, 110002 through its Manager - Sales, Mr Aftab Ahmad, R/o 24/4866, Ansari Road, Darya Ganj, New Delhi -110002 VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Department of Energy, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited (successor Company of CSEB) 4th Floor, Vidyut Seva Bhawan, Danganiya, Raipur 492003, Chhattisgarh Chief Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited, Vidyut Seva Bhawan, Danganiya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Superintending Engineer (TR), Office of the Chief Engineer (O & M), Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited, Danganiya, Vidyut Seva Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Executive Engineer (TR), Office of the Chief Engineer (S & P), Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited, Vidyut Seva Bhawan, Danganiya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh M/s Electro Power, Solan, Himachal Pradesh through the Chief Engineer (S & P), Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited, Vidyut Seva Bhawan, Danganiya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOFINDIA Present: Shri Ranbir Singh Marhas, counsel for the petjtioner. Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Addl. A.G. forthe State/ respondentNo.1. Shri Prashant Mishra, Senior Counsel with Shri D.K.Gwalre.counsel for respondents No.2 to 5. Shri Abhishek Sinha, counsel for respondent No.6. ORDER (17th November, 2009) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri Prashant Mishra, learned Senior Counsel for respondents No.2 to 5 submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondents to open the price bid of the petitioner has now become infructuous as the contract in question has already been awarded by respondents No.2 to 5 torespondent No.6. 2) In this view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file another writ petition for the reliefs sought in this writ petition and also seeking cancetlation of the award of the contract to respondent No.6. ——- SUBBU Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- / Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge