IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.21949 of 2011 Date of decision : 26.11.2011 Sneh Lata ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Dr.Suresh Kumar Redhu, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The petition and the contentions raised in support thereof are merely fanciful figments of imagination of the petitioner not substantiated by any material and have been invoked to seek a transfer to a place of petitioner's choice. There is no reason to interfere in the exercise of jurisdiction under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner is free, however, to pursue her remedy with the respondents. Dismissed. 26.11.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss