IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10976 of 2010 LALJEE HANSDA @ KALJEE HANSDA, SON OF LATE KAILU HANSDA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARDELA, P.S. DHAMDAHA, DISTRICT-PURNEA……PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR……………….OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Bijendra Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. U.S.P. Singh, A.P.P. --------- 2. 22.4.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. This is a case of misuse of the privilege of bail. The petitioner had been declared absconder on 23.8.2006, however, he has been remanded in this case on 2.4.2009. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that his bail bond was cancelled due to the laches on the part of his pairvikar as the petitioner had gone outside the State to earn his livelihood. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial in the court below. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of - 2 - the case, the petitioner, Laljee Hansda @ Kaljee Hansda, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge (F.T.C. 06), Purnea, in connection with Sessions Case No.07 of 1993, arising out of Dhamdaha P.S.Case No.149 of 1991, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be the close relative or his family member, who will file affidavit before the court below giving full genealogy showing his or her relationship with the petitioner. Further, the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of trial in the court below. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of the trial in the court below without any reasonable cause being shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)