FAO.No. 161 of 2010. 20.5.2011. Present: Mr.Jatinder P.Ranote, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Asstt. Solicitor General of India, for respondent No.2. CMP(M). No. 412 of 2010. Heard. For the reasons set out in the application, I am satisfied that delay in instituting this appeal is bonafide. This application is allowed and delay in filing the appeal is condoned in the interest of justice Application stands disposed of. FAO.No. 161 of 2010. The Commissioner under Workmen Compensation Act has summarized his finding in one short paragraph without in any manner giving any reason and without adverting to the merits of the case. This is not the manner in which adjudication is to be made by statutory authorities. Reasons need not be elaborate but they should be qualitative so that the appellate Court can know the functioning of the mind of the adjudicating authority. This statutory and constitutional fundamental is absent. In these circumstances, this case is remanded to the appropriate authority for decision afresh in accordance with law. Petition is disposed of. Parties are directed to appear before the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class Recong Peo on 1.7.2011. Let the record be sent back forthwith. (Dev Darshan Sud), Judge. May 20, 2011(R)