IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH OCTOBER 2007 / 25TH ASWINA 1929 WP(C).No. 30797 of 2007(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ C.ANTONY, S/O CHACKO, NETHRAMANGALATH VEEDU, K.P.VALLUVAN ROAD, KADAVANTHRA P.O., ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.BLAZE K.JOSE RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. CORPORATION OF COCHIN, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN 682011. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, CORPORATION OF COCHIN, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN 682011. 3. T.R.HARIKRISHNAN, S/O T.K.RADHAKRISHNAN, THRIKKAYIL MADOM, NETTOOR, MARADU, COCHIN. BY SC SRI.RAMESH BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/10/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ---------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 30797 of 2007 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of October , 2007 JUDGMENT Ext.P8 demolition order is the order impugned. Against Ext.P8, Ext.P10 statutory appeal has been preferred by the petitioner before the councel of the first respondent Corporation. I dispose of the writ petition directing the council of the first respondent Corporation to hear the petitioner and the 3rd respondent and dispose of Ext.P10 in accordance with law at the earliest and at any rate within two months of receiving a copy of this judgment. Considering the averments in the writ petition and various documents placed on record and the facts which are discernible, there will be a further direction that Ext.P8 shall not be implemented till such time Ext.P10 appeal is decided and the decision is communicated to the petitioner. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. dpk