IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 3315 of 2008 Date of Decision: 1.07.2009 Hem Raj …Petitioner. Versus. H.R.T.C …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surinder Singh, Judge. Whether approved for Reporting? No. For the petitioner: Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. Per Deepak Gupta, J.(Oral) Reply has not been filed. However, from the averments made in the petition it is apparent that the petitioner challenged the order dated 18th April, 2006 whereby he was relieved on account of his transfer from Sunder Nagar to Una. The case of the petitioner was that he was previously working in a tribal area and on his request he was posted to Sunder Nagar. According to him, he should have been permitted to complete his normal tenure at Sunder Nagar where he was posted. Stay in this case was granted on 26th April, 2006 and since then the petitioner is continuing at Sundernagar. He has, therefore, by now completed almost four and half years stay. He has completed his normal tenure and therefore, the petition has become infrctuous 2 by efflux of time. The petition is, therefore, rejected and the stay order is vacated. ( Deepak Gupta ) Judge. 1st July, 2009. ( Surinder Singh ) ™ Judge.