IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.29870 of 2011 Bhutku Pandit & Anr. Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr. ---------------------------------- 3 08-12-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner No. 1, namely, Bhutku Pandit and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner, being father-in-law of the deceased is languishing in jail custody since 19-05- 2011 in a case registered under Sections-304B, 201, 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as a matter of fact, the son of the petitioner had solemnized his court marriage with the deceased but later on, the deceased was found missing and no specific overt act has been attributed against the petitioner but I am not at all convinced with the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner because in course of investigation, the clothes and some parts of the body of the deceased, were found in forest and the witnesses have very specifically stated in course of investigation that the petitioner was not happy with the marriage of deceased with his son and he used to torture the deceased. 2 Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Banka (Barahat) P.S. Case No. 160 of 2011 pending in the court of Chief judicial Magistrate, Banka is , hereby, rejected, at least, at this stage. Learned Chief judicial Magistrate, Banka should commit the case of the petitioner to the court of sessions within one month from the date of receipt of the order in accordance with law and after commitment, the learned trial court shall conclude the trial of the petitioner as early as possible. AKVishwakarma ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)