09 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 247/2007 RAJKUMAR INDORIA ..... Petitioner Through Ms. Anu Mehta and Mr. Rubinder Pal, Advocates. versus GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ANR .... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Additional Standing Counsel. Mr. A.K. Singh, Adv. for the applicant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA O R D E R % 09.08.2010 In view of the order passed in W.P.(Crl.) No.286/2007 no further orders or directions are required in the present contempt petition. During the pendency of the writ petition (Crl.) No.286/2007, this Court, vide order dated 15th March, 2007 and 17th April, 2007, had directed that the petitioner shall be provided with the same security, which was being provided to him hitherto before by the police station Nabi Karim. In the status report it is pointed out that after the order dated 15th March, 2007, a permanent police picket was set up adjacent to the house of the petitioner for security purpose. In addition, as and when requested, the local police had provided PSO without fail to the petitioner. After order dated 17th April, 2007, was passed by the Court, police officers of the police picket were directed to accompany the petitioner when he left the house and petitioner was not required to approach the police station for the said purpose. In the status report it is also mentioned that the petitioner had made a complaint at police station Tilak Marg, which had resulted in registration of FIR No.115/2007 under Sections 341/506/34 IPC. The petitioner had alleged that four persons had got down from a car and threatened him after entering in his car and had also shown him a pistol. Investigation revealed that the petitioner had not given any name or car number. Subsequently a cancellation report has been filed before the trial court. Proceedings in this regard are pending and the petitioner herein is opposing the cancellation report. In view of the aforesaid position, no further orders are required to be passed on the contempt petition. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the FIR No.115/2007 and the cancellation report. SANJIV KHANNA, J. AUGUST 09, 2010 NA