c.F ^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) REVIEW PETITION N0._^? _/2010 8£R5ir APPLICANTS PETITIONERS ^ ^%: ^"^, \<y*'"\ .•"' :;^'. {'•• V-* £-''S<"' Vs" . Shankar Lal Jaisawal S/o Purshottam Jaisawal, aged about 43 years, R/o Primary School Mudagaon, block- Tamnar, Tah. Tamnar, District Raigarh (C.G.). 2. KeshavPrasad Chaudhary S/o Salikram Chaudhary, aged about 48 years, R/o at post Jarekela, Tamnar, Tah. Tamnar, District Raigarh (C.G.). 3. Pradip Kumar Behra S/o Duryodhan Lal Behra, aged about 49 years, R/o at post village Jarekela, Tamnar, District Raigarh (C.G.). 4. Madhav Prasad Chaudhary S/o Salikram Chaudhary, aged about 44 years, R/o at post Jarekela, Tamnar, District Raigarh (C.G.). 5. Smt. Kanaklata Bohidar w/o late Jhhadeshwar Bohidar, aged about 52 years, R/o at post Tamnar, Tahsil Tamnar, District Raigarh (C.G.). 6. Surya Kumar Panda s/o Shashi Bhushan Panda, aged about 50 years, R/o B.E.O. Office, Tamnar, District Raigarh (C.G.). 7. Ashok Kumar Sahu s/o F^.irshottam Sahu, aged about 45 years, R/o at post Kasdol, Tamnar, District Raigarh (C.G.). 8. Basant Sahu s/o Shiv Prasad Sahu, aged about 46 years, R/o at post village Kasdol, Tamnar, District Raigarh (C.G.). 9. Dulichand Patel s/o Ramdayal Patel, aged about 43 years, R/o Primary School- Saraitola, Block 8s Tahsil- Tamnar, District Raigarh (C.G.). 10. Pardeshi Lal Behra, S/o Sahdev Behra, aged about 48 years, R/o village - Gaurmudi, post Saraipali, Tahsil Tamnar, District Raigarh (C.G.). 11. Dhaneshwar Prasad Son s/o Basudev Son, aged about 48 years, R/o Primary School - Tharakpur, post Saraipali, Tahsil - Tamnar, District Raigarh (C.G.). 12. Bhuvneshwar Singh Sidar s/o ^ NON-APPLICANTS RESPONDENTS Ratan Singh Sidar, aged about 4S years R/o Primary School- Bhaisgadi, Block 8s Tahsil Tamnar, District Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.). Assistant Coramissioner, Tribal Welfare, Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.). District Education Officer, Education Department, Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.). Block Education Officer, Tamnar, District- Raigarh (C.G.). k ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR APPUCANTS PETmONER REVIEW PETmON No. 8 of2010 Shankar Lal Jaisawal & Others. NON APPUCANTS RESPONDENTS VER8US State ofChhattisgarh & Others. APPLICATION FOR REVIEW SB: Hon'ble Shri Satlsh K. AtsnihotriL J. Present: Shri S.K-Tiwari, Advocate for the aiylieants. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State/Non-applieants. ORALORDER 4. 5. ra (Passed on 01s' day of Febmary, 2010) Leamed counsel appearing for the applicants submits fhat it appears that in the order dated 03.12.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No. 3824 of 2008 (Shankar Lal Jaisawal & Others v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) (Annexure A/l) inadvertently, in para 2 and 3 ofthe order, in place of "order dated 12.03.2007 (Annexure P/8)", it was vwongly typed as "order dated 6.2.2007 (Annexure P/2)". Leamed counsel appearing for the State/non-applicants has no disagreement with the submission made by leamed counsel for the petrtioner. In view ofthe above, it is directed that in para 2 and 3 ofthe order dated 5.12.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No. 3824 of2008,,the word "order dated 6.2.2007 (Annexure P/2)" be read as "order dated 12.03.2007 (Amiexure P/8)". The review petition is accordingly disposed o£ A copy of this order be placed alongwith the record of W.P.(S) No. 3824 of2008. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Amit