1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Writ Petition No.3655 of 2008. _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _______________________|_______________________________________ 1. Heard. 2. In Contempt Application No.54/2007, learned Judge, Cooperative Court, Jalgaon, directed the petitioners to pay monthly salary arrears to the Respondents. The Contempt proceedings are not required to be used as coercive method for recovery. The question regarding eligibility of the Respondents to receive monthly salary is a disputed question of fact. In this view of the matter, the learned counsel for the parties give concession and make a statement that the Contempt application requires afresh consideration on merits. 3. By consent, the impugned order dated 5.4.2008, rendered in Contempt Application NO. 54/2007 is quashed. The Contempt Application is restored to its original position with direction to decide the same afresh on merits, keeping all the points open. The application may be decided within a period of six (6) months as far as possible. (V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) Dt.19.06.2009. asp/office/wp3655.08