1 wp-4532-09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION W.P. NO.4532 OF 2009 Mr.Sahid Mohid Shaikh ..Petitioner Vs. The Oriental Ins. Co.Ltd. and Ors. ..Respondents .... Mr. Deepak Sharma Adv. for Petitioner .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : 29th JULY , 2009 P.C.: 1. Heard. This petition is directed against the order dated 23rd January, 2009 passed by the learned Commissioner for Workmen ’s Compensation & Judge, 8th Labour Court, Mumbai whereby the application preferred by the petitioner for transfer, came to be rejected on the ground that the application had to be heard by the same Court. 2. The case of the petitioner is that he met with an accident. Hence, he filed WCA No.422/C-134 of 2007 under Workmen ’s Compensation Act. The matter was disposed of by passing judgment dated 17th July, 2 wp-4532-09 2008 by the Commissioner for Workmen ’s Compensation, Mumbai thereby the learned Judge of the IIIrd Labour Court, Mumbai partly allowed the application and awarded amount of RS.53,128/- towards compensation with 12% interest thereon from one month after the date of accident till the payment of entire compensation. The petitioner filed application for review of the said judgment dated 17th July, 2008. Thereafter, the application for transfer came to be preferred by the petitioner on the ground that the learned Judge of the IIIrd Labour Court had already decided the original application dated 17th July, 2008 and the petitioner apprehended that he will not get justice from the said Court, hence, it was requested that review application be transferred to another Court. 3. It is well settled that in matters of review, only the Court which has passed the judgment or order, can review the same. No other Court can review the said judgment or order. Hence, no case is made out for interference with the order dated 23rd January, 2009. Petition is dismissed. [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]