IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.485 OF 2009 M/s. Ispat Infrastructure (I) Pvt.Ltd. ... Petitioner Vs. Mumbai Municipal Corporation and another. ... Respondents Mr. K.A. Chothani for the petitioner. Ms. A.R. Joshi for the BMC. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 8TH APRIL, 2009 P.C.: The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that they would pay the total demand of Octroi duty of Rs.74,498/- without prejudice to their rights. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the Corporation submits that they would release the goods upon payment of the Octroi duty and without prejudice to the rights of the Corporation to take appropriate action in relation to evasion of Octroi duty and in relation to the goods already brought in by the petitioner. 3. Petition stands disposed of. Parties would abide by their statement. No order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.