1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO: 2570/2007 (Sau. Surekha s/o Namdeorao Fate and another vs. State of Maharashtra and others ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram Court's or Judges Order appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders. .................................................................................................................................................................. Shri K S Narwade, Adv.for petitioner Shri Nitin Sambre, G.P.for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. Shri Sachin Sambre, Adv.for Respondent No.3 CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED: 18th February, 2008. *** Leave to amend. 2. Learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.3 states that they have no objection in accepting the claim of the petitioner provided Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 grant an approval thereto. 3. Learned counsel appearing for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 submits that earlier decision was taken by the Competent Authority keeping in view the observations made by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Jayashree Sunil Chavan vs. State of Maharashtra : 2000 (Vol. 3) Mah.L.J . 605 . He further states that 2 keeping in view the recent judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of State of Maharashtra vs. Tukaram Chaudhari : 2007 (Vol.2) All M.R. 937, the Competent Authority shall look into the matter and take a decision afresh expeditiously. 4. In view of the statements made by the learned counsel appearing for respective Respondents, nothing survives in the Petition. The same is disposed of. The Respondents will abide by their statements and pass an appropriate order within six weeks from today. 5. No order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE sahare