'^A~v% i'y,..ii>t l'!Nsiai!s \^ ^^ s'8 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BSLASPUR APPLICANTS/: (Defendants) Civil RevisioiLN^.294oL20Q3 RESPONDENTS/: (Plaintiffs) 1. Rameshwar Aged 47 years (Died) Son of Sur^t Ram Sahu Smt. Narmada Bai aged 60 years Widow of Rameshar Murarilal aged 45 years Son of Rameshwar Girdhari Lal Aged 40 years Son of Rameshwar IV v 2. Sunil aged Rameshwa Vinod aged Rameshwar 35 years Son of 30 years Son of Dr. Ramkhilawan Aged 41 years Son of Suratram Sahu All of them resident of Village Birkona Tahsil & Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) 3A. Smt. Dhela Bai Aged 65 years Wife of Dhan Sai. 3B. Smt. Savitri aged 40 years D/o of Surat Ram Both resident of Village Sarkho Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Versus 1. Lakhan Lal aged 48 years S/o of Ramta Sahu, R/o Village Birkona Tahsil|& Distt. Bilaspur C.G. 2. State of Chhattisgarh Through Cotlector, Bilaspur C.G. {Civil revisron under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908} Present: No.2. Mr. Aman Kesharwani, counsel for the applicants. Mr. U.K. Singh Chandel.Panel Lawyer for the State/non-applicant Sinale Bench: Hen'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma. J ORAL ORDER !fl?-' is'ti 1 SX^Si f^ -'sL.y 1:'"'^ Soma y 1. Bythis revision, the applicants have chatlenged legality & propriety ofthe order dated 4-8-2003 passed by the 9 Civil Judge Class-11, Bilaspur, in CivilSuitNo.13-A/2002. 2. Learned counsel for the applicants Sjjbmits that the revision has become infructuous. 3. The revision is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. 4. Consequently, M.(C.)P.No.1426/2003 standsdisposedof. Sd/- T.P. Sharma