IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 30.07.2010 COCP No.407 of 2010 Balbir Kaur ...Petitioner Versus Sukhdev Singh Mann ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. A.K.Walia, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjeev Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondent states that neither the pension account of the petitioner has been seized nor any amount has been deducted. He further stated that earlier the petitioner was being paid pension at the rate of Rs.2364/-, which has since been revised to Rs.4836/- and arrears amounting to Rs.24,720/- has been credited to the account of the petitioner. In view of the said fact, no further orders are called for in the present contempt petition. The same is dismissed. Rule discharged. 30.07.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE