(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. Writ Petition No. 6140 of 2008 Shri Vijay Kumar Bagadia (Indl.), Age about 55 years, Occupation : Business, Laxminarayan Oil Mill Compound, Dr. R.P. Road, Jalna 431 202. .. Petitioner. versus 1. Income-tax Settlement Commissioner, Additional Bench, Mahalaxmi Chambers, Mumbai 400 034. 2. Commissioner of Income-tax, Aurangabad, Pune Road, Aurangabad. 3. Union of India, through its Standing Counsel at High Court, Aurangabad. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. M.K. Kulkarni, Advocate, with Mr. R.R. Chandak, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Alok Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General, for respondent nos.1 to 3. (2) ....................... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 5TH NOVEMBER 2009. COURT'S ORDER : 1. Today, the matter is listed on board for hearing Review Application No. 177/2009 seeking review of the judgment and order dated 25th September 2008 delivered in Writ Petition No. 6140/2008. After disposal of the Review Application, Mr. M.K. Kulkarni, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission for speaking to the minutes of the judgment and order dated 25th September 2008 in Writ Petition No. 6140/2008. Permission granted. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the parties submit that in the judgment dated 25th September 2008, in Writ Petition No. 6140/2008, in paragraph 16, it has been erroneously stated that the appeal be restored to the file of the respondent no.2. It is submitted that the respondent no.2 is not an appellate authority and the appellate authority is Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal). 3. Mr. M.K. Kulkarni, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, further requests extension of stay granted by this court to the effect and implementation of the judgment and order dated 25th September 2008 in Writ Petition No. 6140/2008. The said prayer is vehemently opposed by Mr. Alok Sharma, learned Assistant Solicitor (3) General, appearing for the respondents. 4. Accordingly, motion is allowed. (i) In paragraph 16 of the judgment dated 25th September 2009, in Writ Petition No. 6140 of 2008, instead of respondent No.2 at two places, it should be read as "Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)" (ii) Taking into consideration facts and circumstances of the case, we extend the period of stay to the effect and implementation of the judgment and order, dated 25th September 2008, in Writ Petition No. 6140/2008, for a period of four weeks from today. ( N.D. DESHPANDE ) ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE ......................... bgp/WP6140