IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.324 of 2006 SUMAN KUMAR, S/O LAKSHMAN PRASAD YADAV, R/O VILLAGE AND P.S.-KUMAR KHAND, DISTRICT- MADHEPURA. ………………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MADHEPURA. 3. THE DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, MADHEPURA. 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, MADHEPURA. 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, KUMARKHAND, MADHEPURA. 6. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT KUMARKHAND, MADHEPURA. 7. SADANAND YADAV, S/O RAM SHANKAR DAS, R/O VILLAGE-RAMGANJ, P.S.-KUMARKHAND, DISTRICT-MADHEPURA. ………………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 3 17.12.2009 The grievance of the petitioner in this writ application is that his case for appointment on the post of Shiksha Mitra was not considered and respondent no. 7 was not eligible as had produced forged certificates for appointment on the said post. A supplementary affidavit has been filed by the petitioner today and it is submitted by learned senior counsel for the petitioner that appointment of respondent no. 7 has now been cancelled. Therefore, the case of the petitioner has to be considered for appointment in place of respondent no. 7. Now the matter of appointment of Shiksha Mitra and 2 Panchayat Shikshak are being taken by the concerned Appellate Authority, therefore, he submits that the petitioner may be permitted to file an application before the concerned District Appellate Authority for consequential orders in the matter. Permission is granted. If the petitioner files such an application before the concerned District Appellate Authority, the Appellate Authority shall consider the same and shall pass consequential orders in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of filing of such application. With the above observations and directions, this writ application is disposed of. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)