- 1 - VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER No. 437 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION No. 1330 OF 2009 Rajendra Laxman Dube & Ors. .. Appellants Vs. Ms. Maya Laxman Dube & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. P. J. Thorat i/b N. K. Bhosale, for the Appellants. None for the Respondents. CORAM : R. C. CHAVAN, J. DATED : JUNE 9, 2010. P.C. : 1. Present appeal questions the order dated 21-802009 passed by the learned Judge, City Civil Court at Dindoshi, refusing to extend an order which was in force since 31st May 2008. The order dated 31st May, 2008 reads as under- “In view of the statement made by the defendant No.1, she shall not create third party interest or sell the premises till the next date.” - 2 - 2. This order was continued from time to time till 11th of June, 2009. When extension was not inadvertently sought, an application (Exh. 5) was made to the Court, seeking extension of the said order. The learned Judge, by the impugned order dated 21-8-2009, refused to grant such extension. No interim orders have been passed in this suit till date. Though the appellant is without protection, nothing seems to have happened in the mean time. Therefore, the apprehension of the learned counsel for the appellant that in the absence of interim order, appellant’s rights will be prejudiced, is unfounded. Appeal is therefore disposed of with a direction that the Notice of Motion which is pending before the trial Court shall be disposed of expeditiously and preferably within a period of 2 months. 3. In view of disposal of the appeal, Civil Application No. 1330 of 2009 does not survive for consideration, and the same is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- [R. C. CHAVAN, J.]