1.wp-8497-11.doc jdk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8497 OF 2011 Vinod S/o Chintaman Gujre ..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents Mr. A.M.Saraogi for petitioner Mrs. M.P.Thakur AGP for respondent no.1 Mr. A.M.Sethna along with Mr. R.A.Lokhande for respondent no.2 CORAM : S.A.BOBDE AND SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J J. DATE : NOVEMBER 15, 2011. P.C.: 1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties. After hearing the matter for sometime, the following order is passed by consent: i) The respondent no. 2 shall consider the petitioner's application for revocation of the suspension of the existing licence and shall also consider the application for grant of a fresh licence or renewal of the existing licence, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from today. The respondent no. 2 shall thereafter pass a 1 1.wp-8497-11.doc reasoned order. The respondent no. 2 shall afford a hearing to the petitioner since admittedly, some disputed questions of facts are involved. 2. Rule made absolute in the above terms. [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [ S.A.BOBDE, J. ] 2