1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST.) NO.3350 OF 2009 Smt. Simran @ Shabnam Ritesh Singh Mann ..Appellant. versus Sou. Sunanda Kulwant Singh Mann & Anr. ..Respondents. Mrs.Anita A. Agarwal for the Appellant. Mr.U.B.Nighot for the Respondents. CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE AND S.J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATED : 18TH JUNE, 2009 P.C. :- Heard Mrs.Agarwal, the learned counsel for the Appellant. 2. The Appellant was married with Ritesh Mann, son of the present Respondents. She be got son Arman and daughter Amandeep. Her husband Ritesh died a homicidal death on 21.1.2007 and the children remained in the custody of the Appellant. The Respondents had approached the Family Court by filing Petition No.D-159 of 2007 and sought the permanent custody of their grandchildren, that is, Arman and Amandeep. 3. By the impugned order, the said petition came to be allowed 2 in terms of the following relief :- “The respondent is directed to bring the children once in a month i.e. Second Sunday of every month in the Gurudwara near Pulgate where the respondent has taken the children. The children can be taken to Gurudwara at 11.00 in the noon, after meeting the grandparents the respondent can take back the children by 02.00 p.m.” 4. By our order dated 8.5.2009 we had made an interim arrangement by consent of the parties and, accordingly on 10.5.2009 and 14.6.2009, the Appellant had taken the children to the Cantonment Board Garden at Pune and the children spent time in the company of the Respondents between 4.00 to 7.00 p.m. 5. The Appellant’s short grievance is that the children should not be required to be taken to Gurudwara to meet their grandparents and beyond this grievance, she has not further challenged the impugned order. 6. Mrs.Agarwal, the learned counsel for the Appellant, on taking oral instructions, stated that instead of Sundays, the Appellant is willing to take the children to the Cantonment Garden on Saturday between 5.00 to 8.00 p.m. Mr.Nighot, the learned counsel for the Respondents, on taking instructions, states that the same does not cause them any inconvenience. 7. Hence, by way of consent of the parties, we direct that 3 Arman and Amandeep shall be taken by the Appellant to the Cantonment Board Garden at 5.00 p.m. on every second Saturday and they shall remain in the company of the Respondents till 8.00 p.m. 8. We also make it clear that during any such visits, if it starts raining, the children should meet the grandparents in a nearby restaurant or any other enclosed place in the vicinity of the Cantonment Board Garden. 9. The Appeal is disposed off in terms of the above modifications in the impugned order. (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.) (B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.)