Sl LE BESGI 13 l^ \ s-ol—^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fS) No.^l'2-0 / 2006 PETITIONER ^.•i. 1;--''<^? , ^y^y ./y.^'\^'t'\ .••• '.'• x\^-\ i°.--"' >''^>au" ^ \' VERSUS RESPONDENTS •wffjVvV: rP^ <9^r> Narayan Prasad Chandra, S/o. Shiv Lal Chandra, aged about 23 years, Secretary, Grain Panchayat Kapisda, Block Bahmnidih, Distt. Janjgir-Champa. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Panchayat, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The Collector, Janjgir- Champa (C.G.j. The Deputy Director, Panchayt and Social Welfare, Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Bahmnidih, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.). ••" r 5. Gram Panchayat Kapisda through Sarpanch, Block Bahmnidih, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.). 6. Chat Ram Sahu, S/o. Not known, Sarpanch Grain h Panchayat Kapisda, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/387 OF THE ~^r' CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARY PROHIBITION AND ANY OTHER WRIT/ORDER/DIRECTION ON THE SAME NATURE IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. 1 XI-HC-78 llfl^TSh^Tiqi 3^ •<ii<4i<i«,aT(lu'is,Ricnitfy .^./!.^.?^^b&. ^ 200 3TI^?ri4aqi (l^fg^ET) sn^T^rf^iRi craT3f]^TCTRi g^ITWHfSffSn^T <t)i<iF<'i41-i iiiic]T^''te(A<Ri'wi< ^stf^TTsn^r 2.1.: Shri Pravin Das learned coufisel Ms. Sunita Jain PL appears for the petitioner. :or respondents 1 to 5 on advance copy. By the instant petition the p< 14.9.2006 of Annexure P-4 by whicjh Shri B.L. Behra working as Sahafc Panchayat Bamhnidih to officiatit Kapisda by way of interim arrangeijnent the petitioner from the post of Executive OfRcer, Janpad Panchayjat ^titioner has impugned the order dated the respondent No.3 has posted one |yak Gram Panchayat Adhikari, Gram as Secretary of Gram Panchayat as the proceedings for removal of are pending before the Chief Bamnhidih. S^cretary Learned counsel for the was issued to the petitioner some is no progress in the inquiry another person has been postetl circumstances theorder of Annexul pelftioner submits that show cause notice and half years back, however, there |air|st the petitioner and in the meanwhiie in his place and in the aforesaid (•e P-4 is liable to be quashed. agairlst Heard counsel forthe petitioher and perused the record. From perusal of the order inquiry is going on against the pelpioner removed from thepost ofSecretai|y such no cause of action is availablt the instant writ petition. Thus the dismissed at this stage and it is [sf annexure P-4 it appears that some and the petitioner has not been of Gram Panchayat, Kapisda and as to the petitioner at this stage for filing jsetition being premature is liable to be ^ccordingly dismissed. HQwever, if the XI-HC-78 *11^CfTa>»TTcb 3^ •^ipncpr, ®Tii.wre,isidiuy •^f.^LZ^.L "^200 3n^r irag? (l?^3^w) 3T1^T SRT f^IR? (ISITSTI^Tstili'h <^ ??cITWHfi(T3n^T petitioner so desires may file apprcjpriate petition after the cause of action is available to him. In view of this order MWP disposed of. No. 5028/2006 for interim relief stands tiiiFci'fl-i *ii*«-iTffteiA<Ri+(ii< ^3lf^T3TI^fT Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge P.T.O.