^^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATH3GARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BEtiCH H01I?BLESHRIV.K.SHRIVASTAVA& HON»BLBSHRI DHIRENDRA MISHRA, JJ MISC.APPEALICl N0.455 OF2006 AppeUatits : 1, Ga^atri Bai, W/o MaUesh Raai Applicairts Gond, aged about 38 years, 2. Anil Kiiniar, S/ Gond, aged about21 years. 3. SunU Ku Gond, aged aboiit 19^^^^^ !'• , ' ' •.' . • . 4. Yo^sh Kiimar, S/6 Mahesh Rain Gond, aged about t7 years, 5, Ku, JayaDti Bai, D/o jMahesh Ram G^nd, aged aboi^ 6. Ku, Tileslrwari Ba^ D^^ Ram Gond, aged aboiit 12 years. 7. Dwarka, S/o Malieshj Ram Gond, agedabQutlQyears.j AppeUaiit No. 4 to 7^^^a^ iiBt\iral gaardiaxi^^^^^^^^G all are R/o VlUage - Bhodiya, Tali, & Distt. RajnandgaDn Versus Respondeuts ^ Non-applicaiits "3. ^^, .;,"••. ^ Raoiesh @ Rameshwer Nishad S/o Jamath Nishad, aged about 35 years, Driver, R/o Siiigdai, Wa^ Tehsil & Distt Rajnsiidgaon (C.G.) Rupesh Kuniar De^^ ShaiikarlalDewaBgaii^o^^ offhevehicIe^R/oMbhara, Town, Tehsil & Distt. Rajnaiidgaon (C.Gr,) ; National Insuraiice Ck)i^ Th3X)ugh-RegiG>nal,jM^ Qffice, Altash <Miiga Ccmi^ Bhilai, Distt- Durg (G.G.) ^Sm -^ -^J: € T.I.H iij .Preseiit-',;;'':'...:';':';:'. Shri V. K, Shaiina, le^^ for fhe appieUaiits. Noxie fortlie respoi^ ORDER j ; ...-.: ,,'1 (Passed on 24.01.2007) | The ifoUowiiig orde^^ 3hrh?rastava»J This is aa appe^^^^f^^ Vehicle Act, 1988 (Iiencefo 1.:';;''1':/.'11'^..:•''•..,'•,'.:-, 27,7.2006 passedbySecQnd^^^A^ (hencefortli 'fhe Tnb^u^ coBipensation of Rs, 3,13,000/~ haa been allc^ appeUaats, Feeling aggne^ compensation aiiiount. | 2. Onl.10.2005 when towanis viU^^ Bhodiya^^^I^ 08 Z.C.-0625 (hencefortli <the offendmg veliicle'). At the time of accideirtfhe oflfendtagvehicle^w M a rash aiid negUgent niaitner. respondent No. 2 aiid was msured witli respondent No. 3. The appellartts claimnig fh^^i^ fb^ decea^ed calciilated coiDpensati^ fhereafter filed aii applk^a^ award of Rs. 25,70,000/-. Respondents No. 1 to 3^ contested the clami. 3. Leanied Tribunal after apprecia^^ ilie evidence dn record passed ari award as below;^ (a) Forlossofdependency Rs. 3,00,000.00 ; 4:;J--: (b) For agony, paia aiid sufferhig (c) Forfuneralexpeuses (d) For loss ofEstate Total Rs. 5,000.00 Rs. 3,000.00 Rs. 5,000.00 Rs. 13,13,000.00 4. Contention of leamed counsel jfor fhe appellaiit during fhe coxirse ofarguxiient was fhat fhe leanied Tribunal did not Mberally accepted iaconie of fhe deceased and allowed comLpensatibn to fhe appellaats who are wife aad miaor chfldren of the deceased, ! 5, Frorai perusal of fhe rccord and evidence adduced by fhe appeUant i.e, statenient of Chetaalal (A,W.-1) aad Sint Gayatri Bai (A,W, -2), bofh fhese witaesses liave deposed fhat deceased Mahesh Rad wa^ woridug as a labourer and was earaiiig Rs, 90/ - per day. They also stated that at ttie tirae ofdeath Malicjsh Rani was aged 45 years, Learaied Tribiuial accepted fhe evidence aad applyiag correct luiultipMer assessed the loss ofdependency aadalsoallowed Just aad reasonable compensation towards vanous other heads,We do not find aay illegaUty or irifuTiiity so as to condeimi fhe fiiidiag offacts recorded by the leamed Tnbunal. 6. No other poiat has been raised durmg fhe coiirse of argunient 7. In the result, fhe appeal is liable to be disiaissed sunimarily aiid is accordiagly dis^iis^d ia liniiae. Sd/- V.K. Shrivastava Judge Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge IJ-IK^"!