IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-29616 of 2010 Date of Decision:12.5.2011 Roshni Devi .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Rana, D.A.G. Haryana. Mr. Ajay Kaushik, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Vikas Lochab, Advocate for respondents No.6 and 8. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of a direction for handing over the investigation to respondent No.2/CBI in case FIR No.198 dated 20.6.2010 under Section 302/328/34 IPC Police Station Matlauda, District Panipat. Reply has been filed. As per the said reply, on 20.12.2010, a complaint has been moved in the office of Inspector General of Police, Rohtak Range, Rohtak. Thereafter on 4.1.2011, it has been ordered that this case be further investigated by some other gazetted officer. On 7.1.2011, Superintendent of Police, Panipat had directed Deputy Superintendent of Police, Samalkha- cum-undersigned to take necessary action and report. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction that the concerned officer, who is now appointed by the SSP, Panipat, vide his order dated 7.1.2011, to complete the CRM M-29616 of 2010 -2- investigation as expeditiously as possible and submit the final report within 3 months from the receipt of this order. However, this Court has hoped that the concerned officer shall conduct the investigation efficiently and in a fair and proper manner. 12.5.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE