WPMS No. 1615 of 2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. Sharad Sharma, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Kovid Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Brief Holder for the State. The petitioner has questioned the veracity and legality of the notice dated 28th August, 2010 purported to have been issued u/S 167 of the U.P.Z.A and L.R. Act. The question which has been canvassed before this Court is, that upon an order being passed by the Prescribed Authority u/s 143 of the U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act, the land in question is outside the purview of the said Act and, consequently, the notice issued u/S 167 without jurisdiction. Be that as it may. This issue can easily be addressed by the authority itself and, consequently, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner should raise this ground as well as such other grounds available to him before the authority concerned. If such grounds are taken, the authority will consider and decide the matter. This court is not inclined to interfere in the impugned notice at this stage. The writ petition is dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 17.09.2010 Shiv