IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 20107 of 1999 Between: Tata Venkatanarayana S/o.Subbulu R/o.Rajampally Village , Darsi Mandal, Prakasham Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Proh., & Excise Superintendent Prakasham Dist. at Ongole. 2 The Inspector of Proh.,& Excise, Darsi Station, Prakasham Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dt.22-09-1999 for sending 2nd sample bottle to the independent lab, till receipt of 1st and 2nd sample bottle reports not to pass final order in pursuance of the Procs., Rc.No.261/99/A3, Dt:16-3-99 of the 1st respondent by declaring the action of the respondents in not allowing the petitioners toddy business as illegal in respect of license No.140/98-99 , Counter No.2 , Rajampally Village and Mandal, Prakasham District. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.B.SAI RAM GOUD Counsel for the Respondents: G.P. FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court Made the Following: Oral Order: The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the relief sought in the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission made by the counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. __________________ A.GOPAL REDDY,J. 25-06-2004 Murthy ASSSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Proh., & Excise Superintendent Prakasham Dist. at Ongole. 2 The Inspector of Proh.,& Excise, Darsi Station, Prakasham Dist. 3. 2 CCs to the Govt. Pleader for Excise & Prohibition, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad (OUT) 2. 2 CD copies.