(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 3236 OF 2011 1. Chandrakant Nagorao Potdar, Age : 62 years, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Lohgaon, Taluka : Biloli, District : Nanded. .. Petitioners (Original defendant 2. Santosh Chandrakant Potdar, nos.1 and 3) Age : 28 years, Occupation and R/o. as above. versus 1. Rekhabai Janardhan Panchal, Age : 38 years, Occupation : Household, R/o. Badur, now at Jalalpur, Taluka : Bodhan, District : Nizamabad (AP). 2. Sangita Prakash Panchal, Age : 24 years, Occupation : Household, R/o. Bhisi, Taluka : Himayatnagar, now at Nanded. (2) 3. Hanmant Chandrakant Potdar, Age : 33 years, Occupation : Agriculture, .. Respondents R/o. Lohgaon, (Nos.1 & 2 - Taluka : Biloli, Original plaintiffs District : Nanded. & Nos.3 & 4 - 4. Raghuvirsing Sonsingh Chatodiya, Original defendant Age : 34 years, nos.2 & 4) Occupation and R/o. as above. ....................... Mr. V.V. Bhavthankar, Advocate, for the petitioners. ........................ CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 27TH APRIL 2011 COURT'S ORDER : 1. Heard Adv. Mr. V.V. Bhavthankar, for the petitioners. 2. The trial court noticed delaying tactics but ultimately granted opportunity on 8-4-2011, provided PW-1 was cross examined immediately. The opportunity granted was subject to payment of costs of Rs. 3,000/-. The petitioners did not cross examine PW-1 on that day and filed another application stating that they come from poor family and can deposit only an amount (3) of Rs.300/- towards costs. They, therefore, sought reduction of amount of costs from Rs. 3,000/- to Rs. 300/-. That application was rejected by the trial court on the very same day. 3. The subsequent developments thereafter are also disclosed in Writ Petition from paragraph 11 onwards. 4. The trial court is conducting the matter and it has found that there was deliberate attempt to delay it. At this stage, I am not inclined to interfere in writ jurisdiction. 5. With liberty to the petitioners to challenge the impugned orders, after the suit is finally decided, if occasion arises therefor, present petition is disposed of. No costs. ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/3236wp