vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5373 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.5373 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.5373 OF 2008 Prabhavati Shetty ... Petitioner V/s. Slum Rehabilitation Authority & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.S.P. Kanuga with Mr.J.S. Chandnani for Petitioner Mr.G.D. Utangale for Respondent No.1 Mr.A.J. Bhor for Respondent Nos.2-BMC Mr.Vikas Warerkar for Resp. No.3 CORAM: SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J MHATRE, J MHATRE, J. DATED: OCTOBER 15, 2008 OCTOBER 15, 2008 OCTOBER 15, 2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The petitioner has in this petition raised a grievance about the allotment of the area to her by the Slum Rehabilitation Authority and the respondent builder. According to her, she has been allotted 450 sq.ft. at one place and 90 sq.ft in another place; thus, making it impossible for her to run the restaurant which she is running. 2. The Full Bench in the case of Tulsiwadi Navnirman Coop. Housing Society Ltd. & anr. v/s. State of Maharashtra, 2008(1) Bom.C.R. 1 has observed that any grievances regarding the Slum Dwellers and Slum Rehabilitation Authority/Public Body/State, Co-operative Housing Society of Slum Dwellers and Developers, : 2 : Registered Co-operative Housing Society of Slum Dwellers on the one hand and proposed Co-operative Society on the other, Developers and S.R.A./State could be redressed by approaching the High Powered Committee constituted by the Full Bench. It is only after the exhaustion of this remedy that the petitioner who is aggrieved could approach this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 3. In my opinion, therefore, the petition must be rejected, relegating the petitioner to approach the High Powered Committee which will consider the petitioner’s grievance. 4. Petition rejected.