Preeent: Shri PrafuH Bhara’c, counsel for the appellanls. . Shrl N.K. Agrawal, learned Dy. AG. for respondent No.2! State. ORBER (17th Fel’iruary, 26%) The following arder of the Court was passed by Rageev Gupta. C.J. ‘Shri Piafull Bharat, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the appeal filed by the appellants t against the impugned award dated 27.08.2001, passed by the Third Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bastar at j l HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MISGELLANEGUSAPPEAL UNDER SECTION WE OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT. 1W3 DMsEQN EENCH CORIKM: HGN’BLE SHRI RAJEE-V GUPTA, CJ. HGN’EIE SHRS $UN§L KUMAR SENHA, $, M.A.No.1-?9 cf 26(32 APPELLANT$ Vivekanand Mandai, 8/0. Gopa! CLAIMANTS MandaL 45 yrs. Vinay Mandai, Slo. Vivekanané Mandaii 1'5 yrs. App. No. 2 through : Father and Naturai Guardian app. No. 1 boih R/o. Ganga Munda Para, Jagdamur, Dist: Bastar {c.G.) RESPGN§ENT$ K. Swami Rao, $19. Subba Rao, NON- R/o. Anupama Chowk, Jagdaipur, APPLICANTS DEE. Basia (since deceased) State of MP. (Now State of C.G.)‘ Electric Mechanical Public ,Worksi Department Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (Chhati%sgarh} Jagdaipur in Claim Ca3e No.126f2001, with the liberty of wing an appeal against the award dated 01.09.1992, .pas5ed in appeliant3’ eariier Ciaim Case No.?1/1g91. 2) Permission granted. 3) With the above iiberty, the appeai is dismissed as wiihdrawn n i Sunil Kumar sul- Sinha ‘ “ Judge / subbu Chief Jusuce \9