IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 630 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION : 16.01.2008 Dr. Raj Kumar Miglani and others .... PETITIONERS Versus M/s M.T.M. Consulting Group and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Mr. I.P. Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. ( Oral ) Undisputedly, against the impugned action of the respondent bank, the remedy of appeal is provided under Section 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, which has not been availed by the petitioners. In view of this fact, we are not inclined to entertain this petition. Dismissed. However, the petitioners are at liberty to file appeal against the aggrieved action of the respondent bank. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE January 16, 2008 ( RAKESH KUMAR GARG ) ndj JUDGE