HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO.28273 OF 2009 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to pass order holding that the Notice No.2792/GHMC/TPS/SC/2007-08, dated 19.8.2008 of the respondents as confirmed in M.A.No.17/2008 on the file of the Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, as illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable. 2. Heard. 3. It is stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition that the petitioner is the tenant of the premises bearing D.No.7-1-82, Secunderabad, on a monthly rent of Rs.265/- for the last 32 years; that a notice dated 19.8.2008 was issued by the respondent corporation under Section 459 of the Greater Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 (for short, the Act) stating that the building bearing MCH.No.7-1-82, Ranganayakula Swamy Temple is in a dilapidated and dangerous condition and asking the petitioner to vacate; that when the respondent Corporation has issued letter dated 19.8.2008 to the petitioner to vacate immediately the petitioner filed an appeal M.A.No.97/2008 on the file of Chief Judge, City Small Causes, Hyderabad, under Section 654 of the Act and the same was rejected on 12.6.2008 and hence the present writ petition. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the building in question is not in dilapidated condition; that a competent engineer has examined the subject property and opined that the structures of the building is safe and it can withstand for another period of 15 years. 5. On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent has contended that the Municipal authorities came to the conclusion that the structure is dangerous and it is in a dilapidated condition and hence the respondents corporation has issued the impugned notice. 6. In the impugned proceedings of the corporation, it is stated that the demolition of the structure is necessary as the said structure is dangerous to residents. When the petitioner is challenging that notice he has to produce the necessary material before the respondents corporation or before the appellate authority in support of his case. No material or whatsoever is produced by the petitioner to show that the building in question is not in a dilapidated condition and it is in fit condition for human living. It is not in dispute that the petitioner is a tenant in respect of the building in question and as the building is in dilapidated condition, the Endowment Department wanted to construct new mulgies thereon after demolition of existing building. Therefore, in view of the fact that the Municipal Authorities has issued the notice as the structures of the building in question are in dilapidated condition and it is dangerous to live therein, the impugned notice needs no interference and there are no valid grounds to grant the relief sought for. 7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. _______________ K.C.BHANU,J. 08.11.2011, Gk. HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO.28273 OF 2009 Date:08.11.2011 Gk.