i c^ •2n^ RPAIPij BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGHCQURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION ( S) NO.5'^3 OF 2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^. A^ f'^o f^y ,.s>J.-y^'<- ^^^\'.- ^^/ ./^'y ^^/' / ^' ^ / ^/'^/ ^" ^ r' Prakash Kumar Patwa, S/o Late Bhojram Patwa, aged about 43 years, R/o Kotra Road Rajeev Nagar, Raigarh, District - Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through - The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Collector, Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.). ^-"" 3. Block Education Officer, Education Department, Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.). "^, WRIT PETITION UNJDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FQR ISSUENCE OF WRIT OR WRITS, ORDER OR ORDERS, ^ DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMDTANCES OF THE CASE. '^ mGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARHATBILASPUR PETmONER WRIT PETITION fS) No. 5663 of2010 Prakash Kumar Patwa. RESPONDENTS VER8US State ofClihattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon»bieShii Satish K. Agmhotri J. Present: Shii S.K/Iiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Slm P.t^.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer forthe State/respondents. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 05th day ofApril, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that m view of the retuni filed by the State/respondents, and letter dated 30.12.2010/07.01.2011 (Aimexure R/l), the grievance ofthe petitioner stands satisfled and nothing remains for adjudication. 2. Leai-ned couiisel appearing for other side does not controvert the above submission. 3. In view ofthe above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become iiifiTictuous. —~ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gov=m