Civil Revision No. 7829 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 7829 of 2011 Date of decision:- 21.12.2011 Ghisa Ram ...Petitioner Versus Mahipal and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Mr. Arun Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. RITU BAHRI J.(Oral) The precise grievance of the petitioner is that on 15.11.2011 (Annexure P-4) evidence of the plaintiff was closed on account of the fact that work of the Bar was suspended and the counsel could not appear to cross-examine the witnesses of the plaintiff PW5 Mahipal and PW6 Hand Writing Expert. An application was moved immediately on 30.3.2011 to take one opportunity, which was dismissed vide order dated 15.11.2011 (Annexure P-4). Vide order dated 12.1.2011 this Court while disposing of Civil Revision No.155 of 2011 had given one last opportunity to the plaintiff to conclude his evidence subject to payment of `5000/- as costs. The present petitioner could not cross examine the witnesses as the work was suspended. This civil revision is allowed and the order dated Civil Revision No. 7829 of 2011 -2- 15.11.2011 is set aside and one opportunity is granted to the petitioner to cross examine the witnesses PW5 Mahipal and PW6 Finger Print Expert subject to payment of `5000/- as costs. If the respondents have any objection, they can approach this Court. December 21, 2012 ( RITU BAHRI ) Vijay Asija JUDGE