IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19542 of 2011 Lalit Mahto @ Lalit (Kumar) Mahto Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02 01.07.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 25 (1-b) A/26 of the Arms Act. On the secret information that the petitioner is residing with Shiv Dhari Prasad, in his house the raid was conducted when one country made rifle and live cartridges were recovered. It is also alleged that the petitioner managed to flee away from the place of seizure. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that admittedly the recovery was not made from the petitioner and it appears that unreasonable that the petitioner fled away from scene when the informant was alongwith four other persons. It is also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Let the learned court below consider regular bail of the petitioner, if 2 petitioner surrender within a period of four weeks and pray for regular bail in connection with Hilsa (Karai Parsurai) P.S. Case No. 449 of 2010 pending in the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa. With above observation, the application is disposed off. Let the order be transmitted to the learned court below through FAX at the cost of petitioner. Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)