CWP(T) No. 11582/2008 09.08.2011 Present: Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. J. L. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondent No.1 Mr. Vinod Thakur, Dy. A.G. for respondent No.2 On the oral request of the learned counsel for the parties, Registrar, Cooperative Societies is added as a party respondent No.3. Registry to make necessary correction. 2. It is seen that petitioner’s representations (Annexure A-7 & Annexure A-8) are yet pending with the Registrar, Cooperative Societies. Learned counsel for the respondent-bank submits that similar petition already stands withdrawn by the aggrieved employees for the reason that they subsequently stand promoted. Petitioner has also been promoted to the post higher than to which he was initially appointed. 3. In support of his contentions, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the following judgments rendered by the Apex Court as well as by this Court:- “P. Mahendran vs. State of Karnataka, (1990) I SCC 411, N. T. Bevin Katti vs. Karnataka Public Service Commission, (1990) 3 SCC 157, State of Rajasthan vs. R. Dayal, (1997) 10 SCC 419, Gopal Krushna Rath v. M.A.A. Baig, (1999) I SCC 544, Arjun Singh Rathore v. B. N. Chaturvedi, (2007) XI SCC 605, Hemani Malhotra v. High Court of Delhi, (2008) VII SCC 11, Nadu Computer SC BED, G.T. Welf Society vs. Higher Sec. School Computer, (2009) XIV SCC 517, Raisul Islam vs. Gokul Mohan Hazarika, (2010) VII SCC 560 & Himender Kumar vs. State of H.P. & Ors. Latest HLJ 2010 (HP) 1059.” 4. The factual matrix however has to be considered by the respondent bank. As such, as prayed for, a direction is issued to the Registrar, Cooperative Societies to decide the petitioner’s representations by taking into account the rival contentions of the parties after affording due opportunity of hearing/representation to all concerned. Needful shall be done within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the judgment. If required, all consequential actions shall also be taken within the aforesaid period. 5. With the aforesaid observations, petition stands disposed off. Copy dasti. August 09, 2011 ( Sanjay Karol ), (rana) Judge.