FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 57/2008 IN MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 925/2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5436/2005 (Sheikh Ibrahim Sheikh Ismail vs. Haidariya Urdu Education Society and two ors) With CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1408/2008 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. Shri Anand Parchure, Adv. for Appellant Shri Z.A.Haq, Adv. for R-1 & R-2 Shri S.Y.Deopujari, A.G.P. for R-3 CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR AND S.R.DONGAONKAR, JJ DATED : 09 th JUNE, 2008. Counsel for the appellant and contesting respondent have placed two pursis on record dated 22nd April, 2008 and 9th June, 2008, respectively. Both the pursis are duly signed by the parties as well as their advocates (except respondent no.3). Counsel for respondent No.3 has objected to the second sentence in clause (2) of Pursis dated 22nd April, 2008. The respondent no.3 wants the said position to be clarified. Respondent No.3 has no objection if the pursis are taken on record and the matter is disposed of, provided the position is clarified in this order to the effect that the appellant will not claim the arrears of the salary and monitory benefits for period anterior to the grant of approval to his appointment. Counsel for the appellant accept that position. In the circumstances, the appeal and all derivative applications are disposed of on the basis of the above said pursis subject to above. JUDGE JUDGE Rvjalit