IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 28TH MARCH 2008 / 8TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 10472 of 2008(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SHAHUL HAMEED, PLAVILA VEEDU, VADAKKUMKARA KIZHAKKECHERRY, UMAYANALLOOR P.O. KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.S.SANTHOSH KUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KOLLAM. 2. THE TAHSILDAR (RR) KOLLAM. 3. LAILA BEEVI, KILITHATTIL VEEDU THAZHUTHALA, KOLLAM. BY SHRI.TEKCHAND, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 10472 of 2008 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 28th day of March, 2008 J U D G M E N T Even according to the petitioner, the property purchased by him belonged to 3rd respondent, who is guarantor for the registration granted to the defaulter. Guarantor's liability is strictly in accordance with the bond. This writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of directing 2nd respondent to call for the bond and limit recovery to the extent of liability of the 3rd respondent under the bond. Revenue recovery proceedings will be kept in abeyance for one month from now. If payment is not made within one month from now either by the petitioner or by the 3rd respondent, the 2nd respondent Tahsildar will attach and sell the property purchased by the petitioner for recovery of the amount due under the Bond. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) jg