HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Applicant. M.C.C.No.496of2009 Umesh Kumar Patel, Aged about 37 years, Son of Shri Shyamlal Patel Resident ofVil. Daldal Sioni, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS Smt. Manjula Patel, Aged about 31 years, W/o Umesh Kumar Patel, Resident ofVillage Uria, Tahsil Patn, Dlstrict Raipur (C.G.) APPLICATION FOR RESTCM^ATION Present: Shri G.D. Vasvrani, counsel for the petitioner. RESPONDENT ORDER >th (16m November, 2009) The fotlowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri G.D. Vaswani, learned counsel for the petitioner is heard on the restoration petitlon. 2) The petitioner is seeking restoration of F.A.M. No.40/2)08, which came to be dismissed fbr want of prosecution vide order dated 30.10.2009. 3) On due consideration of the submlssions of learned counsel for the petitioner and the grounds taken in the restoration petition, we are satisfied that the absence of the petittoner's/ •'%®2S appellant's counsel on 30,10.2009 when F.A.M.No.40/2008 was taken-up for hearing was based on bona fide grounds. 4) M.C.C.No.496/2009, therefore, is allowed and F.A.M. No.40/2008 is restored tojts.original number Sd/- ChiefJustice ? Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge subbu <>J..