1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4428 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4428 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4428 OF 2007 IN IN IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO. 310 OF 2007 CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO. 310 OF 2007 CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO. 310 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Central Excise Thane - II. .. Appellant. vs. M/s. S.D. Enterprises. .. Respondents. Mr. A.S. Rai with S.D. Bhosale i/by Ms. Ritu Singh for Appellant. None for Respondents. CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & SANTOSH BORA, JJ. SANTOSH BORA, JJ. SANTOSH BORA, JJ. DATE: 24TH APRIL, 2008. DATE: 24TH APRIL, 2008. DATE: 24TH APRIL, 2008. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant. None appears for the Respondents. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 336 days delay caused in filing the Appeal. 2. Perused the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion. The impugned order was passed on 14.6.2006 2 and the Appeal came to be filed belatedly on 27.12.2007. 3. We are not at all satisfied with the reasons given for delay that of getting the draft memo of Appeal prepared and also to obtain certain documents. No sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Hence, Notice of Motion stands dismissed. 4. In view of the dismissal of the notice of motion, the appeal also stands dismissed. (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (SANTOSH BORA, J.) (SANTOSH BORA, J.) (SANTOSH BORA, J.)