[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.1856 OF 2007 Mr.Swarup @ Pappu Hanumant Patankar ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.Vikas Shivarkar Advocate for applicant Mr.Rajesh More A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JUNE 28, 2007 DATE : JUNE 28, 2007 DATE : JUNE 28, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant was granted bail. However, thereafter from 4.12.2006 to 5.4.2007, the applicant remained absent, hence, NBW came to be issued and the bail granted to the applicant came to be cancelled on account of service of NBW. The reason given by the applicant is that on account of marriage of his sister, he could not attend the Court. However, it is seen that the marriage of sister of the applicant had taken place on [-2-] 23.1.2007, however, even thereafter, the applicant did not remain present before the Court till 4.5.2007, hence, at this stage, I am not inclined to grant bail to the applicant. 3. It is stated that the charge is framed and the trial is likely to commence. It is further stated that besides the present case, the applicant has clean record. Looking to this fact, in case, there is no progress in respect of trial by 1.8.2007, liberty is granted to the applicant to prefer a fresh application for bail before the trial Court. 4. Application is rejected. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]