IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID THURSDAY, THE 7TH JULY 2011 / 16TH ASHADHA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 714 of 2011(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.16387/1996 .................... PETITIONER: --------------- JOSEPH, S/O.THE LATE PETER, AGED 32 YEARS, ARAKKAL HOUSE, KOCHI-5. BY ADV. MR.M.H.HANIS RESPONDENT: --------------- AJITH PATIL, SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF COCHIN, ERNAKULAM. ADV.MR.BABU KARUKAPADATH THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Con.Case(C).No. 714 of 2011(S) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE I: JUDGMENT IN O.S.NO.175/1986 DTD.29.11.1988 OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT, KOCHI. ANNEXURE II: JUDGMENT IN A.S.NO.41/1989 DTD.18.12.1990 OF THE PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, KOCHI. ANNEXURE III: JUDGMENT IN O.P.(C).NO.16387/1996-A DTD.21.10.2003 OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT. ANNEXURE IV: PURAMBOKE IDENTITY CARD ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL ....... // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE. HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. ------------------------ Cont. Case (C) No.714 Of 2011 ---------------------- Dated this the 7th day of July, 2011. J U D G M E N T The contempt case is filed by the petitioner in O.P.No.16387/1996 complaining violation of the directions contained in the judgment dated 21.10.2003. Annexure 3 is the said judgment. The only direction issued in the said judgment is to consider Ext.P4 on merits. For all these years, the petitioner has no complaint regarding the non-consideration of Ext.P4. The petitioner has not chosen to move any forum complaining about the non-disposal of Ext.P4. The contempt case filed at this distance of time is without any merit and bonafides, and hence dismissed. HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge. bkn/-