IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.17191 of 2007 Between: Andhra Pradesh Grameena Vikas Bank, Kunavaram branch, Kunavaram village and mandal, Khammam district rep. by its Branch Manager ... PETITIONER a n d The District Collector, Khammam, Khammam district and others … RESPONDENTS ORDER: The writ petition has been filed by the Andhra Pradesh Grameena Vikas Bank, Kunavaram branch, Kunavaram village and mandal, Khammam district represented by its Branch Manager with a prayer to issue writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in trying to disburse the compensation amount to the borrows without obtaining no objection certificate as illegal and arbitrary. 2. When the writ petition came up for hearing, both the learned counsel agreed that the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the order dated 10-11-2009 passed by this Court in W.P.No.2613 of 2007 (V.R. Kandriya Primary Agricultural Co-operative Society Limited, Satyavedu mandal, Chittoor district and others v. the District Collector, Chittoor district and another). The relevant portion of the order passed in the above writ petition reads as hereunder: “Several averments were made in the counter-affidavit in paragraph No.4. It is stated that it is not correct to state that respondent No.2 is taking steps to disburse the compensation amount to the borrowers without deducting the due amounts payable to the petitioners. The payment was made duly after obtaining the No Due certificate from the concerned PACS and DCC Banks. The same stand had been taken even in paragraph No.6 of the counter- affidavit. In the light of the same, this Court is of the considered opinion that the writ petition be disposed of directing the respondents not to disburse the compensation amount to the borrowers of the petitioners without obtaining No Objection Certificate from the petitioners in pursuance of the notifications and declarations issued under Sections 4(1) and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act in acquiring the properties specified in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.” 3. Following the judgment stated in the above writ petition, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents not to disburse the compensation amount to the borrowers of the petitioners without obtaining No Due certificate from the petitioners in pursuance of the notifications and declarations issued under Sections 4 (1) and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act in acquiring the properties specified in the writ petition. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________________ B. SESHASAYANA REDDY, J July 26, 2010. PN THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.17191 of 2007 July 26, 2010