IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1993 of 2010 Date of Decision: August 26, 2010 Gurmeet Singh …Petitioner Versus Mrs. Balbir Kaur and others. …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH. 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Puneet Jindal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Arvind Mittal, Advocate with Mr. Amarjit Markan, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 1 to 3.. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 16.12.2009 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge ` (Senior Division), Jalandhar, whereby the application of the C.R. 1993 of 2010 petitioner – plaintiff to file supplementary affidavit in his examination-in-chief was rejected. Learned counsel for the plaintiff-petitioner states that in view of Order 7 Rule 14 as amended by CPC Amendment 1999 w.e.f. 01.07.2000, all the documentary evidence shall be filed along with the plaint and any documentary evidence which could not be filed along with the plaint, can be filed with leave of the Court. He states that without seeking leave of the Court under Order 7 Rule 14(3) C.P.C., the present application was wrongly moved. He further states that now proper application under Order 7 Rule 14(3) C.P.C. shall be moved seeking permission from the Court to place on record additional documentary evidence. He further states that present petition and application moved by the plaintiff-petitioner before the learned trial Court which was rejected by the learned trial Court be permitted to be withdrawn. Present petition as well as application on which impugned order is passed are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. In case, such application is moved by the plaintiff-petitioner, it shall be decided by the learned Trial Court in accordance with law. August 26, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2