HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.CHELAMESWAR And HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.APPARAO 04-09-2006 WRIT PETITION No.18342 of 2006 Between: Arram Reddy Savithri .. Petitioner And 1. Government of A.P., Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others. ..Respondents *** ORDER: (Per JC, J): This writ petition is filed with a prayer as follows: “To issue Writ order or direction more particularly Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents to produce the detenue viz., 1) Arramreddy Narsimha Reddy S/o.Laxma Reddy, aged about 61 years, Occ: Retired Teacher, R/o. Venkanna Kunta Bazar, Jangoan Town, Warangal District, 2) Narsimaiah, S/o.Not known, aged about 40 years, Occ: State Committee Member of C.P.I.M.L. Janashakti, R/o.Kurnool, Kurnool Distraict, 3) Ashok Kumar, S/o. not known, aged about 51 years, Occ: C.P.I.M.L. Janashakti Leader of Utter Pradesh, 4) Ramu Power, S/o. not known, aged about 53 years, Occ: C.P.I.M.L. Janashakti Leader in Maharashtra, 5) K.Rajanna, S/o. not known, aged about 60 years, Occ: C.P.I.M.L. Janashakti Central Committee Secretary, R/o.Vemulavada of Karimnagar District, before this Court and set them at liberty after declaring their arrest as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional.” 2. On 01-09-2006, the learned Advocate General took notice, sought time for getting instructions. 3. The substance of the allegation in the writ petition is that the detenu, whose names are mentioned in the prayer, extracted above, were arrested by the 3rd respondent on 31-08-2006 at about 2.30 P.M. and whereabouts of the said detenu are not known. The writ petition itself was filed on 01-09-2006. 4. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, both the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Advocate General informed the Court that the alleged detenu were in fact produced before the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate at Medpally in Karim Nagar District and they were remanded to judicial custody. In the circumstances, nothing survives for further enquiry into the matter. 5. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. _____________________ J.CHELAMESWAR, J ____________________ September 4, 2006. D.APPARAO, J Kvr