CW 7486/06 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Civil Writ Petition No.7486/2006 Ramjilal Meena Versus Union of India & Ords. Date of Order ::: 01/12/08 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Saransh Saini, for petitioner Mr. Sanjay Pareek, for respondents. Petitioner while working as Sr. Auditor (Accounts) was transferred & relieved vide order dt.14/09/06 (Ann.5), which has been challenged in instant petition raising multifarious grievances. Initially this Court passed an interim order on 21/09/06. However, in their reply to writ petition, (copy whereof was supplied to petitioner's Counsel on 06/03/07), respondents have raised preliminary objection with regard to jurisdiction in view of S.28 of Central Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 (“Act, 1985”), as per which grievance raised herein are covered U/s 14 of the Act, 1985 for which jurisdiction only lies with the Tribunal to examine such disputes and thus S.28 bars jurisdiction of this Court. It has also been brought to the notice of this Court that pendente writ petition, vide order dt.09/04/07, while revoking suspension of petitioner, he was asked to report in Zonal Office (PD) Delhi Cantt. CW 7486/06 //2// In view of preliminary objection raised by respondents, writ petition is not maintainable. However, Counsel submits that instant petition has been filed under legal advise extended to the petitioner in the year 2006 and it may cause prejudice to him, since limitation to file application before Tribunal under the Act, 1985 has expired pendente instant petition. Consequently writ petition is dismissed alongwith 2nd stay application No.60/07 with a liberty to petitioner to avail remedy under law. However, if application seeking condonation of delay, if any, is filed before the Tribunal it be sympathetically considered. No costs. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p2/7486CW06-0112rmdy.doc