IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40015 of 2010 2 9.11.2010 Ram Prasad Singh S/o late Janak Dhari Singh, Resident of village Chakbhaili, P.S. Tajpur, District Samastipur VERSUS The State of Bihar ------- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. There may be substance in the submission that Section 307 IPC is not attracted in this case. However, the injury report produced by learned counsel for the petitioner shows that the informant Putul Devi, who was pregnant at the relevant period, had received injuries on the abdomen. The specific allegation of giving blow with leg on abdomen is against this petitioner and, therefore, the learned Sessions Judge while granting anticipatory bail to others, has rejected petitioner’s prayer. In the facts of the case, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. It has been submitted that ultimately the injury was found to be simple and petitioner is aged about 68 years. - 2 - It is expected that petitioner’s prayer for regular bail shall be considered expeditiously on the basis of all the materials including his age without being prejudiced by this order. sk (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)