CWP No.6034 of 1988 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Date of decision: 23.03.2010 Bhoop Singh Vs. The Director of Fisheries, Haryana, and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. RS Kundu, Addl. AG, Haryana. -- PERMOD KOHLI, J. (Oral): The petitioner has challenged the order dated 13.07.1988 (Annexure P-02) whereby the petitioner has been ordered to be adjusted against the post of Fisheries Supervisor subject to approval from the Subordinate Services Selection Board, Haryana, and on failure of such approval to terminate his services. The petitioner was selected for the post of Marketing Assistant (Fisheries) by the Subordinate Services Selection Board and consequently appointed on the post. It appears that respondent No.3 who was working on ad hoc basis on the said post obtained some stay order. The petitioner was accordingly appointed against the post of Fisheries Supervisor. It is stated that the said post is lower in status. The petitioner has challenged the order referred here-in-above. This petition is pending since 1988. In the meantime, the petition filed by respondent No.3 who was holding the post against which the petitioner has been appointed, also stands decided. It appears that the CWP No.6034 of 1988 2 petitioner thereafter filed another writ petition being CWP No.16577 of 1991 claiming his appointment against the post of Marketing Assistant on the basis of his selection. This writ petition was allowed by a Division Bench of this Court on 11.2.1992 and the respondents were directed to appoint the petitioner against the post of Marketing Assistant for which he was selected under the Ex-servicemen category. Mr.Kundu informs that Judgment dated 11.02.1992 passed by this Court in the above-said writ petition has been implemented by the respondents. Mr.Kundu has placed on record another order dated 17.03.1992 whereby the petitioner was promoted to the next higher post. None has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. In view of the above circumstances, the relief claimed in the writ petition already stands granted. Nothing survives in the present petition. The same is dismissed as such. 23.03.2010 (PERMOD KOHLI) BLS JUDGE