^'r'^^\ IN THE HIGH CpU^TLOFjCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SECOND APPEAL N0. ^ S f- QF 2007 APPELLANT .:\ -''a \.^'' "-.^^' Shivdayal S/o Moharsai, aged about 51 years, R/o Tikripara Janjgir, Ward no. 8, Tahsil Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa C.G. (Defendant no. 1) VERSUS /< .-^^.^' p f RESPONDENTS :1. Belbai W/o Ram Prasad Suryavanshi, aged about 51 years, 2. Dharam Lal S/o Ram Prasad i3, Suryavanshi, aged about 39 years, Panchram S/o Ram Prasad Suryavanshi, aged about 26 years, JivEin S/o Ram Prasad Suryavanshi, aged about 27 years, Parvati Bai B/o Ram Prasad Suryavanshi, aged about 41 years, Laxmim' Bai ©/o Ram Prasad, aged about 14 years, : K' Minor thrpugh mother Belbai, R/o Tikripara Janjgir, |. 'nrEii i^ All are resident of ward no. 8 Janjgir, Tahsil Janjgir, District Janjgir Chanipa C.G. (Plaintiffs) 7. StateofC.G., Through: the Collector Jangir Champa C.G. (Defendant no. 2) MEMO^)F SECOND APPEAL UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF^IVIL PROCEDURE, 1908. -»- 31]^Tc^f^!W W STI^I *1'+ Gopal ^ST "41'41<rl'4, »nly'l<»,^^iyy S.A- \^.-^S^/2-^^~ "WI, 260 3^\ 1FRT (lclij»f^I) ^OTW'dte'BI^I ^i<i(ci<fli *d^^\ ^ f^st <r3K^.i< ^•Bfimsn^i S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra 28-7-2010 No one appears for the a Shri Shashi Kumar, coun Shri Sanjeev Agrawjal, State/respondent No.7. In the first call, Shri Ral| ppellant. ^el for respondents No.1, 3 and 4. Panel Lawyer for the esh Pandey, learned counsel had appeared and informed that th|e appellant has withdrawn the file from his office and that he has ilo instruction. The matter was passe<l over once in absence of any representation on behalf of the ^ppellant. No one appears for the aj)pellant even in the second call. In the circumstance, the^e is no other option left with the Court but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. The second appeal is disitnissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge 1-rf cs