IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 10547 of 2008 Between: Kanaparthi Ramachandra Rao S/o. Late Sri. Krishna Rao R/o. Thirumalapalem, Jangareddy gudem Mandal, West godavari Dist., A.P. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Bank of India, Tadepalligudem Branch, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari Dist. 2 Recovery Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal III Floor, Ishnar, Khajana Towers, 2nd lane, Dwarakanagar, Visakhapatnam. 3 M/s. Lakshmi Traders, Partnership Firm, Rep. by its Partners2 and 3 All R/o. Pattipadu, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District. 4 P. Venkata Krishna Rao All R/o. Pattipadu, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District. 5 Smt. P.Lakshmi Rani All R/o. Pattipadu, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District. 6 Smt. P. Gangachalam All R/o. Pattipadu, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District. 7 P. Raja Rao All R/o. Pattipadu, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the paper notification dated 28-04- 2008 published in Eendu Telugu daily newspaper West Godavari Edition, fixing the auction sale scheduled to be held on 9-5-2008 at 12 noon in R.P.61/06 in O.A.No. 228/06 in the premises of bank of India, Tadepalligudem branch, issued by the 2nd respondent as unjust, arbitrary and contrary to the settled law and consequently set aside the paper notification dated 28-04-2008 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.V.SIMHADRI Counsel for the Respondent No.: . The Court made the following : O R D E R: Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the amounts due to 1st respondent-Bank of India have been settled and accordingly the 1st respondent-Bank issued a letter on 27.4.2008. It is also stated in the letter that they will be returning the documents after receiving the same from the Court. Such is the situation, no cause of action survives in this writ petition. This writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. 01-07-2008. (B.Seshasayana Reddy,J) tnb ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KSRANI} THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.10547 OF 2008 01-07-2008.