IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17849 of 2010 RAMESH TOLA @ RAMESH KUMAR TOLA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 21.05.2010. Heard the learned counsels for the parties. The petitioner, namely, Ramesh Tola @ Ramesh Kr. Tola, apprehends his arrest in Malsalami P.S. Case No. 24 of 2010 under Section 419, 420, 467, 468/34 of I.P.C. It appears that from the godown of the petitioner, various articles including the articles resembling with tea and other materials as mentioned in detail in seizure list (Annexure-1) to the bail application were recovered. At the time of raid, the petitioner fled away. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner deals with business of Agarbatti, Masala. On the other hand, the learned A.P.P. objected the prayer for Anticipatory Bail. From perusal of the seizure list, which is a part of Annexure-1, it appears that various articles in huge quantities have been recovered from the godown. From perusal of the order passed by the Sessions Court, it appears that the witnesses have supported about the seizure of the duplicate materials in paragraph 13, 14, 18, 20, 21, and 22 of the case diary. Consider the above facts and circumstances of the case at this stage, I am not inclined to grant the Anticipatory Bail to the petitioner and accordingly this Anticipatory bail petition is rejected. Sanjeev (Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.) 2