( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2250 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2249 OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra APPLICANT VERSUS Satish Vasantrao Gaikwad and others. RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. K.S. Patil, APP for the applicant. ..... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 30th September, 2009] PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. There is delay of 10 days in filing of the application for leave to appeal. The delay is explained in paragraph Nos. 2 and 3 of the application. It is stated that due to official difficulties, there was delay in drafting of the appeal memorandum. Considering the reasons stated in the application, I accept the explanation and condone the delay. The application is allowed accordingly. ( 2 ) 3. Leave is granted. 4. Admit the appeal. 5. Call for record and proceedings. Print is dispensed with. 6. Action under section 390 of the Criminal Procedure Code. [ V.R. KINGAONKAR ] JUDGE NPJ/criapln2250-09-2249-09