IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 16TH AUGUST 2011 / 25TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 22131 of 2011(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- M/S.AUTUMN TREES, DEVIKULAM, IDUKKI, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SRI.C.G.YESUDAS. BY ADV. SRI.J.JULIAN XAVIER SRI.FIROZ K.ROBIN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI DT., COLLECTORATE, KUYILIMALA, IDUKKI-685603. 3. SUB-COLLECTOR, DEVIKULAM- 685 613. 4. TAHSILDAR, DEVIKULAM TALUK, DEVIKULAM, IDUKKI-685 613. 5. VILLAGE OFFICER, KANNAN DEVAN HILLS VILLAGE, DEVIKULAM-685 613. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.22131/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY SALE DEED DATED 1.3.2005. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF PREVIOUS TITLE DEED DATED 19.2.92. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF RECEIPT ISSUED BY 5TH RESPONDENT DATED 9.7.92. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF CERTIFICATE DATED 29.11.2004. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF LOCATION SKETCH ISSUED BY 5TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 6.12.2010. EXT.P7: TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 28.12.2010. EXT.P8: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 26.7.2011. EXT.P9: TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 26.3.2008 IN WPC NO.34521/2007. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 22131 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 16th day of August, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner claims to have purchased 10 cents of land in Sy.No.155/3 of KDH Village in the year 2005 and Ext.P1 is the sale deed. According to the petitioner, immediately thereafter he sought mutation of the property. There was no progress in the matter. Therefore, he submitted Ext.P6 representation. Subsequently, Ext.P7 report was obtained from the Village Officer and even thereafter 4th respondent has not passed final orders in the matter. It is complaining of the above, the writ petition is filed. 2. Now that the grievance is as above, at this stage, all that is necessary is that the 4th respondent shall finalise the proceedings. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 4th respondent to pass orders on the application made by the petitioner for mutation of the property in the light of Ext.P7 report of the Village Officer. Orders shall be passed at any rate within 8 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp