IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P(T) No. 4917 of 2008. Decided on: 1st September, 2010. Sarla Devi. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 to 3. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. None for respondent No. 4. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present petition in order to enable his client to make a representation to the second respondent for the redressal of her grievance. 2. Consequently, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the second respondent, i.e., Director of Education for the redressal of her grievance within a period of four weeks from today. Thereafter, the same shall be decided by the second respondent in accordance with law by passing a speaking order within a further period of two months after the receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that while considering the representation of the petitioner, the respondent 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 shall also take into consideration the manner in which the respondent 4 has been appointed as Part Time Water Carrier. 3. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge September 01, 2010. (bhupender)