18-wp-2987-10.doc jdk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2987 OF 2010 Shri. Shankar Jajaba Golesar since deceased through his legal heirs Shri. Kashinath Shankar Golesar since deceased through his legal heirs Smt. Sulochana Kashinath Golesar and Ors. ...Petitioners Vs. Shri. Kisan Vitthal Lonare and Ors. ..Respondents Shri. Harshad Inamdar advocate for petitioners Shri. R.M.Hardas i/b P.N.Joshi advocate for respondent no.1 Shri. R.M.Patne AGP for State CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 20th JULY, 2011. P.C.: 1. This writ petition was placed before me on 5th July, 2011. After hearing the petitioner so also the contesting respondents for sometime, I had directed the learned A.G.P. to produce the original record with a view to satisfy the Court as to whether the notice was issued of the hearing to the petitioners and whether the Revenue Minister heard them before the impugned order was passed. 2. The matter was adjourned till yesterday. Yesterday when the matter was placed on board, none appeared on behalf 1 18-wp-2987-10.doc of the petitioners but the learned A.G.P. stated that record is available. 3. Accordingly, the matter was adjourned till today. Shri. Inamdar appeared in the matter for the petitioners. 4. In such circumstances, with the assistance of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, respondents and the learned A.G.P., I have perused the original record. I find that notice of the hearing was duly given to the petitioners, the petitioners appeared through their power of attorney holder who has signed the Roznama. Further, their written submissions were also tendered. All this has been duly considered when the impugned order has been made. In these circumstances, the direction which has been given during the course of the R.T.S. proceedings requires no interference, particularly, when the revenue entries do not affect the right, title and interest in immovable properties. It is always open for them to approach the competent civil Court. The impugned order, therefore, does not require any interference. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed but without any order as to costs. [ S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. ] 2