1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1207 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NOS. 1510 OF 2009 & 1511 OF 2009 IN NOTICE O MOTION NO. OF 2009 IN L.C.SUIT NO. 1383 OF 2009 Vashdev Bheroomal Pamnani ... Appellant Vs. M/s. Seth Industries Ltd. & Ors. ... Respondents Smt. Jai V. Kanade, Advocate,for the appellant. Shri Gaurav Doshi i/w Ms. Neeta Jain, i/b. I.C. Legal, Advocates, for the respondent No.2. Smt. K.K.Saran, Advocate, for respondent No.3 – BMC. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 15th March , 2010. P.C. 1. The appeal was preferred by the original plaintiff against the refusal of ad-interim relief pending the Notice of Motion. By that time, even reply was not filed by defendant No.2. For last about 8 months, no ad-interim relief is in operation in favour of the appellant. In view of these circumstances, the Appeal stands disposed of with the following directions :- 2 As the matter is fixed before the trial Court on 30.3.2010 and as the defendants have already filed reply to the Notice of Motion, if the appellant so desires, may also file rejoinder by that date. The trial Court shall hear and dispose of the Notice of Motion within four weeks thereafter. 2. As the Appeal itself is disposed of, C.A. Nos.1510/2010 and 1511/2010 do not survive and stand disposed of accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)