IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. (T) No. 13570 of 2008. Decided on : 4th May, 2011. _____________________________________________________ Kamlesh Kumar. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Sunny Dhatwalia, Advocate vice Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): In sequel to order dated 6th January, 2011, Mr. Vikas Rathore, learned Deputy Advocate General has placed on record the copy of communication dated 14th March, 2011, received by his office from the office of respondent No. 2. It is clear from the contents of this letter that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. Consequently, the present petition is rendered infructuous. 2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge May 04, 2011. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - - 3 - `