IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 228 OF 2008 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 228 OF 2008 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 228 OF 2008 Smt. Priti @ Manju Bunty Chug.... Petitioner versus Shankarlal Monghrajmal Ghug & ors...... Respondent. Shri Laxman P. Kanal for the petitioner’ Ms. Alfa Jhaveri APP for State. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 27TH FEBRUARY, 2008 DATED; 27TH FEBRUARY, 2008 DATED; 27TH FEBRUARY, 2008 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. The present petitioner is the wife of respondent no.4. The respondent no.4 is staying along with his parents and brother. The relations of the petitioner and the respondent are stringed on account of matrimonial dispute. The petitioner filed a complaint under sections 363, 504,506 read with 34 of IPC and applied for a search warrant under section 97 of Cr.P.C. The trial court issued the search warrant. The same came to be challenged by the respondent by filing a revision before the Sessions Judge and the Sessions Judge, being primafacie of the view that the child is in the custody of the natural father and grand-parents, has stayed the search warrant. It is this interlocutory order granting stay to the execution of the search warrant, which is challenged by filing this petition. Perusal of the impugned order clearly reveals that the child is in the custody of the natural father and grand -parents, and hence Sessions Judge has rightly stayed the order. The same does not call for any interference. Petition is dismissed. ...