IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6896 of 2009 SHIV DAYAL SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 01.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in a Police case under Sections 364, 120B of the Penal Code. Learned counsel submits from the statements under Section 164 Cr.P.C. of the alleged victim that he proceeded voluntarily for Delhi with co-accused Karu Ram. In the train the petitioner and others allegedly made him inhale substance leading to him being rendered unconscious. When he became conscious, he boarded another train for Bombay. It is highly unlikely that the petitioner and the victim again met at Bombay when the petitioner brought the alleged victim back to home in the village. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, abovenamed be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur in Bidupur P.S. Case No. 267 of 2008. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)