jpc/­ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 965 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 970 OF 2007 Sudhir Bababasaheb Patil .. Applicant Vs. Shri Arun Bhimrao Patil and another .. Respondents Shri Ashutosh Gole, for the Applicant Ms. S. V. Gajare, APP for the Respondent­State CORAM :SMT. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE :2nd September, 2009. P. C. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that he has served the respondents by publication and has already filed affidavit of service. However none resent for the respondent 2. Learned counsel points out that he has field this application for condonation of delay. There is delay of 30 days in filing Criminal application No. 782/2008 for restoration of Criminal Appeal No. 970 of 2007. Learned counsel submits that he could not contact the client and therefore, the application for restoration was not filed within limitation and the delay of 30 days caused. 3. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. Delay of 30 is condoned. (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)