1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICMTURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Writ Petition No. 753 of 2008 Shrideo v. The State of Maharashtra and anr ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Ms Priti Rane, Adv for petitioner. Mr D.B. Yengal, APP for respondents. Coram : D.D. Sinha and A.P. Bhangale, JJ Dated : 18th December 2008 1. Heard Ms Priti Rane, learned counsel for petitioner and Mr D.B. Yengal, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for respondents. 2. Writ Petition is directed against the order dated 17.10.2008 passed by the Competent Authority keeping in view the provisions of rule 4 (6) (x) of the Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959. 3. Considered the contentions canvassed by learned counsel for the respective parties and perused the affidavit filed by learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for respondents. Learned APP has submitted that the petitioner was released earlier on many 2 occasions on furlough/parole leave. However, the petitioner did not surrender on due date and is in habit of surrendering late and, therefore, the opinion formed by the respondent is just and proper and impugned order is sustainable in law. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, we are of the view that the petitioner has not made out any case for showing indulgence. Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. Judge. Judge. hsj