In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. C.R .No. 851 of 2007 (O&M) Decided on February 19,2007 Rakesh Khanna --- Petitioner vs. Nachhatar Kaur --- Respondent. Present: Mr. I.B.Bhandari, Advocate,for the petitioner Pritam Pal,J:(Oral) Without going into details, suffice it to say, that despite ample opportunities granted to the petitioner/defendant (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner), he had not closed his evidence and, ultimately, the the petitioner's evidence was closed by order of the Court vide order dated January 29,2007. This is how feeling aggrieved, the petitioner has come up in this Civil Revision. Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that if one opportunity is granted for adducing his entire evidence at his own responsibility, then he (petitioner) would closed his evidence. In the given facts and circumstances of this petition, no notice is required to be issued to the other side at this stage, and hence, this Civil Revision is disposed of with a direction that the learned trial Court shall give only one effective opportunity to the petitioner, for adducing his C.R.No.851 of 2007 -2- entire evidence at his own responsibility,but subject to payment of Rs.5000/- as costs. February 19,2007 (Pritam Pal) RR Judge