IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 28TH JULY 2008 / 6TH SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 22309 of 2008(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- J.VINCENT, (INSPECTOR, KSRTC, POOVAR, RTD. ON 28.2.2007) VINSIALAYAM, VIRALIVILA, UCHAKKADA P.O., NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.P.RAJEEVAN RESPONDENTS: --------------------- KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECOTR, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SC SRI. JOHNSON P. JOHN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP.(C) No. 22309 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 28th day of July, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner retired as Inspector on 28.2.2007. He seeks out of turn payment of pensionary benefits citing the marriage of his daughter, which took place on 14.5.2007. Ext.P2 is the marriage invitation letter. He had approached the Lok Ayukta, and by Ext.P3 the Lok Ayukta directed disbursement of the pensionary benefits to the petitioner. The writ petition filed against the same was allowed on the ground of jurisdiction with liberty to approach this court. It is accordingly petitioner approached this court. It is also stated that the petitioner had availed loan from private financiers for conduct of marriage. 2. I heard learned Standing Counsel also. Having regard to the facts, the writ petition is disposed of as follows: There will be a direction to the respondent to conduct an inquiry as to whether the claim of the petitioner is genuine. This shall be concluded within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. If the claim of the petitioner is found to be genuine, there will be a further direction to disburse the amount due to the petitioner as DCRG in WPC.22309/2008. 2 accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of conclusion of the inquiry. This direction need be complied with only if there is no liability to be satisfied from out of DCRG. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb