k '6) wk j/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR‘ CHHATTISGARH Smggée Bench WRIT PETITION No. JG! 5L OF 2003 U. D. Baghel, aged about 59 years, S/o Shri L.J.Baghel, Dy. Director (industries), Office of Directorate of Industries, Raipur (Chhattisgarh), resident of 22/21,‘-21 Bungaiow, Gayatri Nagar, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ETITIONER x 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Special Secretaw, Department of Commerce & Industries, Mantraiaya, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) . Deputy Secretary, Department of Commerce and Industries, State of Chhattisgarh, Mantraiaya, D.K.S.Bhawa_n, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) . Additionai Director (industries), Directorate of Industries, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) RE§PONDENTS 32, XI-HC—7 8 WWWW R m1) (9% w Vi 2m WIW ({é’aiew) mam ‘ ammm awmi§®€rm %aifauait%¥r mmm 3W1. 25/08/2003: - Shri Pmshan’r Mishm counse! for The pe‘ri‘rioner. Miss Sharmila Singhaiby. 69W. Advoca‘re', fakes no‘fice. on behalf of STaTe/r-esponden‘rs. Since Two oppor'funi‘ries have been grun‘red 'ro The Iearned counsel for The Sfa‘re/responden'rs 1’0 file refurn and “rill Today r'e‘rurn has not been filed, Thereifore, The maffer is heard final ly. . By This wriT peTiTion underi ArTicles 226/227 of The ConsTiTuTion of IndiaiThe peTiTio er' seeks To challenge The order daTed 25/06/2003 by whi h The peTiTioner has been Transferred from The DirecToraTe f IndusTries, Raipur To The office of The General Manager, Zil Vyapar Avam Udyog Kendra, Kanker. The main grievance of T |e peTiTioner is ThaTiheiihas compleTed ‘59 years of age and o ly one year i’s’lefT‘fm' his superannuaTion and as per The GovT Circular daTed 28/01/1997, The GovernmenT should consider is case sympaTheTically and normally The employees who are ’upposed To reTire wiThin a period of Two years, should noT be Transferred. STaTe/respondenTs and The peTi§Tioner has noT made any /"a Since no reTurn has beeili filed on behalf of The T represenTaTion againsT his Transf?r, Therefore, having heard , WW.» l . elm XLHC—7’3 3a W, EWE, ia‘wgj: Wmwg‘é5 WZQQ W W (Kagww WWW amm‘am WWW wm / $ai§mani$ !earned counsel for The parfies anc ?avmg regufrd ‘ro f'ne fucis and circums‘tances of ‘I'he case, fhe )e‘ri‘rioner is allowed +0 make repreéen‘l’a‘fion making reference of fhe Govt. Circukxr' dafed 28/01/997 and expressing his difficuH'ies wifhin a period of fen days To +he SpEcial Secre‘rary, Depor'rmenf of Commerce & Indusfries, Man‘rmlaya, D.K.$. Bhavmn, Raipur. On receiving fine represeni’a‘i'ion of The pe‘iii’ioner ‘i'he Specioi Secre‘mry, Depor‘i‘men‘r of Commerce &r In us'l'ries, Maniraiayo, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur will consider fhe rievances of fhe pei'i’rioner and decide his represenfo‘i’ion in n objecfive manner wifhin a l period of ThirTy .doys from Th doTe of receipT of The represenfai'ion. Tiii The .represe fofion of The pe‘i'ifioner is decided, he sholl not be r'eiieve from his presenf place of posfin'g. In view of The above observ Tion, The peTiTion is disposed of. PdrTies are enTiTled for cerTified copy of This order. Win» Sdl- L.c.BHAD00 Judge ”mew”MMsm‘mmmmm.m /