(16: )noZ/ EN THF HEGH COURT OF CEHATTESGARH JUDICATUREAT BILASPUR C Wins N0; 676 12008 Anuj Kumar Shrivas, S/o— Shri Jagdish P‘rasad Shrivas, Aged about 25 years, R/o- Village& Post -Madisarai, Tehsil - Bharatpur, Disti. Korea, Chhattisgarh. ?ET§TE€)NER VERSUS Stata 9f Chhattisgarh, Through-Secretary, V Department of Panchayat and Rurai Deveiepment, D.K.S’ Bhawan, Mantraiaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Collector, Korea, Distt. Kora, Chhattisgarh. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat- Korea, Baikunthpur, Distt. Korea, Chhattisgarh. Sarpaneh, Gram Panchayat—Madisarai, P.0- Madisarai, Tehsil-Bharatpur, Distt. Korea, Chhattisgarh. RESPONDENTS WRIT E’ETETEQN UNBEB ARTICLE Z261227 OE THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA G W e HIGH COURT OF CHHAT’HSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETlTlON (S) N0. 6861 0f2008 PETITIONER : Anui Kumar Shrivas. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION 9F TNDEA SB: Ean’hie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Present: Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri. Panel Lawyer for the Siam/respondent No. 1 and 2. ‘ Shri Saxajay Patel, Advocate for the respondent No. 4. ORDER ORAL) (Passed on 26 day of Apri}, 201 1) 1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks quashing ofthe advertisement dated 01.10.2008 with regard to selection and appointment on the post of Panchayat Karmi for Gram Panchayat, Madisarai, Janpad Panchayat, Bharatpur, District Koria. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that by order dated 27.12.2007 (Annexure P/7) passed by the respondent No. 4, the petitioner was appointed as Panchayat Kanni. Thereagainst, one Nawai Singh preferred an appeal before the Sub Divisional OtTicer (Revenue) Manendragarh. The Sub Divisional Officer, by order dated 31.01.2009. cancelled the resolution and the order of appointment made in favour of the petitioner. Thereaiter, the respondent No.4 preferred an appeal before the Collector, Koria under the provisionsi’of Chhattisgarh Panehayats (Appeal & Revision) Rules, 1995. The Collector, by order dated 09.07.2010 set aside the order passed by the Sub Divisional Officer and confirmed the resolution and order passed by the respondent No. 4 for appointment of the petitioner on the post of Panchayat Kanni. ') 4.. Thus, the ordsr of appointment has become final. Shri Bhaduri, leamed Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/respondent N0. 1 and 2 and Shri Pate-1, learned counsel appearing for the respondent N0. 4, do not controvert the fhcts as aforestated. There was no challenge against the order dated 09.07.2010 passed by the Collector and as such: the petitioner continues as Panehayat Karrm' pursuant to the order dated 27.12.2007. Further, this Court, Vide order dated 08.12.2008 directed that further selection process pursuant to adveltisement dated 01.10.2008 (Annexure P/l) shall be kept in abeyance. Thus, no vacancy is available in Grain Panchayat Madisarai, Janpad Panchayat, Bharatpur, District Koria. The advertisement dated 01.10.2008, in respect ofappointment of Panehayat Karmi at Gram Panchayat Madisarai, is unwan‘anted, in View ofthe aforesatated facts. appointment on the post of Panchayat Karmi at Gram Panchayat, Madisarai, .lanpad Panchyaat. Bharatpur, District Koria. is not required and the same to that effect. is cancelled. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. No order asto costs. Sd/- , Satish K. Agnihotril Judge Ur