1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9788 OF 2004 Shri.Arvind Madhav Inamdar. ...Petitioner vs. 1.District & Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, Dist.Kolhapur. & anr. ...Respondents. --- Mr.R.P.Lote,for Petitioner. Mr.S.K.Chinchalikar, AGP for Respondent no.1 & 2. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & N.D.DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED: 4th June, 2008. P.C.:- 1. The learned Counsel appearing for both the sides have agreed that the facts and law involved in this petition are identical to the facts and law involved in the writ petition no.9790 of 2004 “Shri.Sadashiv Rajaram Kulkarni Vs. The State of Maharashtra and another” decided on 3.4.2008. in 2 view of this statement for the reasons disclosed in that judgment, this petition is also disposed of and in the same terms in which that petition is disposed of. The respondents are directed to refund to the petitioner an amount of Rs.1,02,165/- deducted from his total amount payable to him, as expeditiously as possible in any case within a period of eight weeks from today. It is clarified that this order will not come in the way of the respondents to re-fix the pension to which the petitioner is entitled in accordance with law ignoring two advance increments paid to him. Rule is made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (N.D.DESHPANDE,J.) ---