IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44956 of 2009 DAYANATH PANDEY SON OF LATE SHIV DAHIN PANDEY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KHAROJ, P.S. SURYAPURA, DISTRICT ROHTAS AT SASARAM. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 22.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The offence alleged is under sections 448, 354, 373, 307 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the specific allegation of firing is on the co-accused Ajit Pandey, who happens to be the son of this petitioner. It is further submitted that the allegation to the effect that the son of this petitioner used the licensed gun of this petitioner is absolutely incorrect since the petitioner is not having any licence of holding any fire arm, as stated in paragraph 11 of the petition. Besides that there is no allegation against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner is aged about 70 years. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj, Sasaram, Rohtas, in connection with Suryapura P.S. Case No. 77 of 2009 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)