1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6869/2008 Laxman & Others Versus Additional District Judge No. 1 & Others Date of Order :: 30th July, 2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Mr. Sanjay Joshi for the petitioners BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. This writ petition on behalf of defendants is directed against impugned order dated 10th July, 2008, whereby the trial court has rejected his application dated 2nd January, 2008, wherein he took certain objections in respect of copies of plaint and written statement filed by plaintiff alongwith an application for reconstitution of the file. 3. The plaintiff-respondents filed a suit for specific performance of the agreement and permanent injunction, wherein a written statement was also filed by the defendants. The record of the said court was burnt in last Gurjar agitation, therefore, plaintiff- respondents filed an application for 2 reconstitution of the file alongwith photocopy and typed copy of the pleadings. The defendants filed an application that the photostat copy of original office copy of plaint and written statement has not been filed by the plaintiff and the so called typed copy has been filed after certain changes in the pleadings. They particularly referred para 10 of the plaint to show the changes alleged to have been made by the plaintiff. The trial court has considered the objection of the learned counsel for the defendants, but after hearing both the parties rejected the application. The trial court, however, observed that whatever the documents have been produced by them or by plaintiff, then they will have a right to cross-examine during the trial of the suit in respect of those documents. The trial court has also observed that the High Court has already passed an order for early disposal of the suit. 4. After considering the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner in the light of detailed reasonings mentioned by the trial court in the impugned order, I do not find any force in the writ petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed in limine. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. 3 DK