1` IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Writ Petition No. 238/2011 Shri Sushilkumar Prakashchand Jain vs. The Deputy Regional Transport Officer and others. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. Mr. T.D.Mandlekar, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. T.A.Mirza,APP for respondents. CORAM : MRS. V.K.TAHILRAMANI & M.L.TAHALIYANI, JJ DATE : 18.04.2011 The case of the petitioner is that his taxi permit has been suspended. The main prayer is that the said order of suspending his taxi permit be set aside. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that this criminal writ petition has been filed as the issue involved falls under section 468 Cr.P.C. Section 468 Cr.P.C. states that a Court is barred from taking cognizance after lapse of period of limitation. In the present case no court has taken cognizance nor is there any possibility of any court taking cognizance in this 2` matter. Hence, section 468 Cr.P.C. is clearly not attracted. In such case a criminal writ petition could not have been filed. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file civil writ petition. This criminal writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE JUDGE patle