IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.40782 of 2011 Sunil Kumar Yadav S/O Late Ram Prasad Yadav, R/O Village- Chandaul, P.S. Rafiganj, District – Aurangabad …Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar …OP ---------------------------------- 2/ 22.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 366-A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the alleged victim is aged about 18 years and she did not support the case of kidnapping, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Pauthu P.S. Case No.26 of 2011, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. 2 Learned court below is directed to immediately commit the case to the Court of Sessions and the Trial Court is directed to pass necessary order to whether any offence is made out against the accused in view of the age and statement of the victim girl recorded under section 164 Cr. P. C. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)