-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1576 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.1576 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.1576 OF 2008 The State of Maharashtra ...Petitioners v/s Shri Madhav W. Chitale and anr. ...Respondents Mr N.D. Deshpande, AGP for Petitioners. Mr M.M. Sudame for Respondents. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND J.P. DEVADHAR JJ. DATE : 4TH AUGUST 2008. -2- P.C. :- 1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties. 2. By consent of the parties, the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai, impugned in the petition, is modified as follows :- . The direction contained in the order setting aside the communication dated 4th December 2001 is set aside. . The State Government shall decide the representation made by the respondent No.1 against adverse remarks for the years 1993-94, 1995-96, 1996-97 and 1997-98 within a period of four weeks from today and communicate the decision to the respondent No.1. . After a period of four weeks from the date of communicating the decision on the representation of the respondent No.1 as directed above, the Departmental Promotion Committee as directed by the C.A.T. by the -3- order impugned in the petition, shall be convened to consider the case of the respondent No.1 for promotion to the post of District Inspector General of Police in suppertime pay-scale with effect from 1994 or any other subsequent date when his juniors were promoted to the post of D.I.G. of Police, with all consequential benefits. . Rule is made absolute accordingly with no order as to costs. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Sheristedar / Private Secretary of the Court. . Certified copy expedited. ( D.K. DESHMUKH J.) ( J.P. DEVADHAR J.)