r^ f s^ r l \. MTHE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BIIASPUR^ CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION No. 2-?3 2- QF 2004 PEnTIONER Versug RESI'ONDENTS y^ fi^yy^ ,^X.-/'<i.'< ^^y >v; / y^y^- ^'.{^ ^•IJ ,..<'" '•\i. Bhojram Miri, aged about 31 years, S/o Anand Ram Miri, working as Panchayat Karmi, Gram Panchayat Jeora, Tehsil Sarangarh, DistriCt Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) 1. State of Chhgttisgarh through the Secretary, Department of Panchayat, D. K. S. Building, Mantralaya,Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. Collector, Panchayat Branch, Raigarh, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) 3. Deputy Djrector, Panchayat & Social Welfare, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) 4. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Sarangarh, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) 5. Gram Panchayat, Jeora through its Sarpanch, village Jeora, Tehsil Sarangarh, District Ralgarh (Chhattisgarh) V :S®TPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA [l 3^F'**tl«|l<t<l;^fllwie,.'fa<rlt.y^; M^.;..2^s.3.2^%oe^. soo 3ll^I^fg^T(^^^> sii^r^ifeiffi OTTan^Tgi'RR? ^4:-\-' lii--: 19.1.2005 Shri HyS.fatel, couhsa! fbr thi Shri Satish fiupta, t)y. State/respondents No. 1 to 4 on dd^ Heard on the quiestion of cidmi THe petitioner' has challeng 7.7.2004 (Annexure P-t) passed by a direction for filling-up the post dccountof remoyai of the petitione that the direction has been complying thescheme, issued fbr para 5.2 of the petition that the pe1 of ©ram Pancliayaf, Jeora has 17,2.2003, filedasAnnexure P-2. concelkrt-ion order, Annewr®P-2 is writ petitioR No. 1798/2003 inwhich( respondents. [ In the fdcts and circumstan4 opihion tho* np fresh causeof dctio^ fo file a writ petition forfquasl'iing' P-1 because thel same i§ d petitionef. j; ", - ©overnnnent Adyocate for fhe (once copy. Bsion. the giv^n •Kie consequ^nce °itl^&3l<ii^ ^flfrK'ff ^f f^^ .<F> ^ . ^, 3JSIPT SII^T ^ ; ^ .^ l^d the validity of; order dated^ respondent No. 3, which is in fact ()f Panchayat Karmi, lyirig yacant Qn '. The contents of the order shows for a fresh appowitment: ajfter- sa.me.. It is dlsd mentioned Ivide titioner's appointmentasa Secre|tary Ibeen cciricelled yide order clcited | has also been stated that th^ 1 sdid ^nderchallenge before this CQurt in the notices have been iissued to •fhe^ 31t jes of th& case, tfais 'C'our'f js ^•Hie^ ! .•:••;;'. :;. •". jqrises infavour of;thepetiti6ner (t-heorder dated ?.7^PQ4, ^nn^xur& •6'f -1-he 'main •order' passey | vide Gt. PRJ—FS/350—12/2000—50,()OQ. XI-HG—78 .^5Er:""<i«wj,^ti1<i'i(B,'[s|<'i(y^< *1)NCT1 *W^ "^200 STI^i^TSRT (li°li^«f<^I) 311^1 ^I R-ficb' '^Tsn 3?n^?T^qi^ -<•• TSTOIt^fel3H^[ ql>iq^*l1l HWV\i "^f T^St ll^FE^R ^ aifg'ff sn^i '; Annexure P-2 regarding removdl j;f the petitioner for which a writ petition is alfeady periding before flpis Court.- The petition has no merit, th^ same isliable to be dismissed and it is dismissed. : Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge