1 wp 7469.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7469 OF 2011 Barku Uda Patil (Hatkar) .. Petitioner Versus Parwatabai Parasram Patil (Hatkar) and others .. Respondents Shri A. K. Tiwari, Advocate for the Petitioner. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 26TH SEPTEMBER, 2011. PER COURT : . The petitioner is the original defendant. The evidence of the plaintiff was led. The present petitioner moved an application Exhibit 95 stating that the documents from Exhibit 76 to 89 should be de-exhibited and that the application is moved to bring to the notice of the Court that the over writing in the roznama is made. The Trial Court rejected the said application. Aggrieved thereby the present petition is filed. 2. Shri Tiwari, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits 2 wp 7469.11 that even the Court has found that the over writings appear in the roznama. The Trial Court has also observed that all the documents were exhibited in presence of all the learned advocates of the parties and after the documents were exhibited the learned advocate for the defendant has cross examined the plaintiff and when the document will deed was exhibited there was no objection put forth by any party. 3. The Judge before whom the evidence is recorded would be the best person to dilate on the same and the learned Trial Judge has considered this aspect and has recorded that all the documents were exhibited in the presence of learned counsel of the respective parties. 4. In view of that no prejudice is caused to any of the parties. The writ petition is as such dismissed, however, with no order as to costs. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/Sept. 11