IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1116 of 2009 1. INDRA KANT JHA, SON OF YUGAL KISHORE JHA 2. LALITA DEVI, W/O INDRA KANT JHA 3. RANJEET KUMAR JHA, S/O INDRAKANT JHA ALL R/O VILL.-LALGANJ, P.S. BIHRA, DISTRICT SAHARSA. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18.4.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State as also the informant. The offence alleged against the petitioners, who are apprehending their arrest in a police case, is under section 498A and other allied sections of the Penal Code and section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted that there is no specific allegation against these petitioners of committing the alleged offence under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioners no.1, 2 and 3 are father-in-law, mother-in-law and brother-in-law of the informant respectively. The learned counsel for the informant submits that the allegation is against all the accused persons of torturing the informant on account of non-fulfillment of dowry. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioners no.1 to 3 above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Saharsa (Sadar) P.S. Case No.453 of 2008 within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two 2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)