AB 316/2010 BEFORE HON\BLE MR JUSTICE P K MUSAHARY Heard Mr. R Dhar, learned counsel for the accused petitioner. Also heard Mrs. Ah meda Begum, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The accused petitioner approached this court earlier for enlarging him on bail u nder section 438 of the Cr.P.C. and the same was rejected vide order dated 04.11 .2010 in BA No.5068 of 2010. This is the second application. The learned Addl.P.P. has produced the case diary. I have perused the same. It i s found that all the accused persons, except the present accused petitioner, hav e already been arrested in connection with Dispur Police Station Case No. 1312 of 2010 under section 395/ 365/ 376 (2) (g) of the IPC and enlarged on bail. T he I.O. has already examined some witnesses during the investigation but none of the witnesses has implicated the present accused petitioner nor has he been ide ntified by any witness or seen present at the time of occurrence. In view of the above, I direct that in the event of arrest of the accused petiti oner namely, Manash Talukdar in connection with Dispur Police Station Case No. 1312 of 2010 under section 395/ 365/ 376 (2) (g) of the IPC, he shall be enlar ged on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 15,000/- with one local surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority on condition that he shall make himself available before the I.O. concerned within 7 (seven) days from today for interrogation and recording his statement required under law. Further, he shall appear before the learned Trial court and the arresting authority as and when r equired. This anticipatory bail application has been allowed and disposed of.