C/(- ?yro I BEFORE THE^ HONOURABLE HI&H COURT OF CHHATTES6ARH AT BILASPUR C.G. W.P.(S)SO!^ /2011 PETITIONER: -•fc ^&r-', ^^••^y^ ^•fS^y .^^s^ »»»••'IQ^"y" ^^" ^dfc-- 1.5mt.Surinder Kaur wd/o ajbeuj' Late Fakir singh agedk?5® years ^ 2. Jagdish singh s/o Late Fakir singh aged 22 years Both resident of Qr.No. 136bB Risali sector ^a- Bhilai Tahsil and Oistt. Durg C.G. VERSUS RESPONDENT:- 'P'nL^jg-v The Managing Wws^wr of ffi Ferro Scrap Nigam Limited (GovT Undertaking) Bhilai Distt. DurgCC' (»- WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226. 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF MAN&AMUS .CERTEORI. AN& OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT(S) ORDER ETC. 1. PARTECULARS OF PETCTIONER As mentioned in the cause title. 2. PARTECULARS OF RESPONDENTS "^, . As mentioned in the cause title. -S'o' XI-HC—78 sf^y w R-fi* ?TgIT 3TI^T S0*1fqi ~3~ST "41<<l<n<1, ©flly-iKo,fildl'M^ ^^^^.....^.S2.1^.1^ Sf^V TT5RT (liclf^«<<l!l) 200 ?^nw ^ifta sn^i rSB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra 16.6.2011 Shri Arvtnd Kumar Dub Heard on admission. chi^<ft*i 'qp:raf ^f 'feT^t <nn<-^R ^sifim 3)i^i ;y, counsel for fhe petitioner. This petition has beei inaction on the part of petitioner's appllcation dated of compassionate appointmer] filed b\r fhe petitioner aggrieved tljie respondent tn not considerms 10.4.2011 (Annexure P-7) for grant Leamed counsel for husband of fhe petitioner w^ he was found missuig from| whereabouts was not kno^l declaration, wherein a decre^ husband of the petitioner ha^ agaln moved an applicatf appointaiient, which so far ha|s appointment, if any. The dec .1 [the petitioner submits fhat the employed as HEME Operator and 20^ March, 1999 and when his rn, tlie petitioner filed a suit for has been passed declaring (hat the i died. Thereafter, the petitioner has on for grant of compassionate failed to evoke any response. The respondent shoulfd consider the application of fhe petitioner in the light of Ipieir own pollcy of compassionate sion on petitioner's appllcation shaU be taken by tfae respondent ^ithin a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. ^ ^/ XI-HC—78 TST '^Wlvt^, axll'M'IS, f°ICTI^^< *11*<CTi **licb Wi. 200 Sn^I'iTWi' ('^li-l«<<{iT) sn^iw R-<H W SW^V shli'h WWW ;El!?tT 311^1 2-- chi<il<n*<li iTTRcTf ^f f^t •^^.K ^3ffOT3II^F 1$ In case, the grievance i^ be at Uberty to take recoiirse| to her under fhe law. With the aforesaid ol| disuosed of. Pras-e-ea i not redressed, the petitioner would to sueh remedy as may be available 'servations, fhe petition is tinally Sd-/ Manindra Mohan Shrivastava ^ Judge