C24 No. 11 of 2011 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Rajendra Singh, Advocate for the respondent. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, the Court finds that the respondent is a practicing Advocate at Civil Court, Roorkee and that the said respondent had instituted an application for restitution of conjugal rights u/S 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The present application has been filed by the wife for transfer of the case to any other court. Having considered the submission of the learned counsel for the parties and, having perused the record wherein an effort for reconciliation has been made which has failed and, in view of the admitted position that the opposite party is a practicing Advocate of Civil Court at Roorkee, the Court allows the transfer application in the larger interest of justice and transfers the case No. 76 of 2009, Sanjay Yadav Vs. Meera Yadav and others pending before the Additional Family Judge, Family Court Roorkee to the competent court of jurisdiction at Haridwar. The transferee Court will decide the matter preferably on a day-to-day basis and dispose of the matter within six months. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 20.07.2011 Shiv