IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6059 of 2009 Between: Yanamadala Veeramsetty. … Petitioner And Pulapaka Venkata Satyanarayana Rao. … Respondent This Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 6059 OF 2009 ORDER:- In a suit filed for permanent injunction, petitioner/plaintiff sought for a temporary injunction in I.A.No.331 of 2006 in O.S.No.52 of 2006 on the file of Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Kothapeta. On dismissal of the above I.A. on 04.02.2008, the petitioner being unsuccessful in carrying the matter in appeal in C.M.A.No.3 of 2008 before the II Additional District Judge’s Court, East Godavari at Amalapuram, filed this revision against the dismissal of the C.M.A.No.3 of 2008, dated 27.04.2009. Even though the appeal was dismissed on 27.04.2009, the copy application was filed on 23.11.2009, which was furnished on 26.11.2009 and the present revision was filed on 02.12.2009. It is well settled that Article 227 of the Constitution of India is not meant to enlarge the law of limitation for filing an appeal. Both the courts below concurrently held that the petitioner is not entitled to the relief of temporary injunction, and in effect, since from 2006 there is no injunction in favour of the petitioner. In view of the same, no infirmity is discernable with the orders passed by the courts below, warranting interference. Accordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed directing the trial court to dispose of the suit, uninfluenced by any of the observations made by this court. No costs. __________________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J 22nd January 2010 lmv