/ya^ ^. ....-^%^ ^ %SSSSb 1 '®s;:—<j J l^" 'S^I '*{WIV\f, ®Tlly'IS,fqcll'Hy ^ Hr*teii fl»*ii<t» •WI.200 sn^i ^il fiFiw SWI a»<iii 311^11R^ (^3^?) WllW^lteiailt?! WP(S) N 2. Ravishanker Siagh, A^ Raja Bhaj Aged abo'ht Both are Both are Naivadap, 1. State of <t Mines andl 2. The Maa4 Developine^it Bhawaii, 1} (CG) 3. Ths Speciajl Developaiel Riag Road| 4 The Ofiice^ Mines, Tab .B Hon'ble Shri Dhireadra Mr. V.K. Pandey, learaed c\ Mrs. Saiita Ghai, le^rned F^ Heard. By the uistant petitiou, tt| the respondents to consider cbl'i<f<*liii*< *fi*i<nf'^ Fs<<l <P>f^.k ^sifipTsn^T 3.286 OF 2909 Sio.gh Solaaki, Son of Narvdeshwar ;d about 49 years. Shukla Son of Shri Rainadhar Shukla, 48 years workmg on fhe post of Com.pounder, resident of CMDG, Bariina Miaes UT, Tahsil Sitapur, Distt. Sm-guja (CG) 3ihattisgarh, through the Secretary, Minerals, DKS Bhawan, Raipiu- (CG) Igiag Director, Chliattisgarh Muieral Corporation Ltd. . Sona Khaii 'iag Road No.l, RTipur, Distt. Raipur Duty OfBcer (Adinuiista-ation), Miueral nt Corporafion, Sona Khaa Bhawan, No.l, Raipui', Distt. Raipiu- (CG) Incharge (Assistaat Zeologisf) Barim.a sii Sitapur, Distt. Surguja (CG) )uiisel for fhe petitioners. L for fhe State, e petitioners are seebing direction to representation of Aruiexure P/4 fU.eir Oltlflil^sBil di;"ll<.)i| y«l^i<;'IM—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000. 4. + 0>^ '3^ r<iit|ici<i,yfll'y'i<o, fs|dl^lj,< IIICTI «1*11<»» "ysf200 3ll^?lTffi?:r ('yil^i'i^) an^i ^it R-fi'k WII 3)1^1 aiiiii t± wnw^ifci aii^i 2— whereby the petitioners have pr£ fhem. proiaotion/upgradation afl fheir service as per rules. Learaed couusel for thc employees under respondent No for more tlian 12 years auc prouiotiou/upgradatiou. This fs situated einployees vide ordej petitioners have been denied fhe has also uot been considered iu fhough he is not pressing this pejtition on inerits at this stage, however, he prays for Uberty to the petitio respondent No.2 for redressal of and fhe sam.e m.ay be directed to petition is disposed of wifh 1L1[ representation before responden|i in fhis petition, along wifh copy| withia a period of 10 days from.| further period of six 'weeks representation in accordaace witjh. law. q)t<lld<ftl TnTi?Tf ^ .'feT^ <Pqt$K iTsiRmsii^it ^yed before respondent No.2 to extend ;r cdiapleti.on of 14 years 6 ijaofhs of petitioners subniits that all ttie 1.2, who have served the orgaiuzation upto 24 years, are entitled for .citity.was extended to other simiiarly .of Annexure P/3. However, the above right aiid fheir represeQtation this regard. He furfher subinits fhat |.iers to file fresh represeritation before |fheir grievauces raised in fhis petitiou be decided wifh a speci&ed period. Haviug heard leamed co'i|tn:sel for the petitioners, fhe uistanf >erty to fhe petitioners to file fresh t No.2 detaUing fhe grievances raised of fhe petition aad copy of fhis order today. On such represeatafion bein; niade, respondent No.2 sh.aU. ccjnsider and decide fhe same within a froni the date of receipt of Sd/- Dhu-endra Mishra Judge |1 wwft'r*ftirga»iii.KT(RnRiira—FS/95—11/2008—i,oo,ooo.