IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1418 of 2011 Manju Devi Versus Jaso Rani & Ors. ---------------------------------- 3/ 10.08.2011 The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 15.11.2010 passed in Title Suit no.15 of 2006 by learned Munsif, Lakhisarai, by which he has allowed the plaintiffs to adduce additional evidence. 2. The petitioner submits that even assuming that the learned counsel appearing for the other side was ill from 01.06.2008 to September 2008, still the recall petition was filed after delay of three months. He submits that in case, if this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order, liberty may be granted to the defendant 1st set to adduce additional evidence. Learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits that in the meantime some of the witnesses of the plaintiffs have already deposed. 3. Though there has been some delay in filing the recall petition but as some of the witnesses of plaintiffs have already deposed, this Court is not inclined to set aside the impugned order. Liberty is granted to the defendants 1st set to adduce additional evidence. 4. This application stands disposed of. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)