IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16662 of 2009 1. NARENDRA KUMAR SINGH S/O LATE SRI KALAPNATH SINGH R/OVILL KHANGAON, DISTT- BHOJPUR AT PRESENT RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. M.I.G.-18, MOHALLA- DALPUTPUR, P.S.ARA NAWADA, DISTT- BHOJPUR Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD THROUGH IT MANAGING DIRECTOR CUM ADDL. SECRETARY PATNA 2. EXCUTIVE ENGINEER, BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD, P.H. DIV, BAHADURPUR, PATNA-20 3. REVENUE OFFICER, BIHAR STATE, HOUSING BOARD, P.H. DIV. ,BAHADURPUR, PATNA-20 4. SUB REGISTRAR OFFICER ARA , BHOJPUR, REGIONAL OFFICE, ARA, BHOJPUR 5. THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 13.12.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the Bihar State Housing Board. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 19.10.2009 by which the respondent Board has demanded a sum of Rs. 9,90,889/- as dues for allotment of Flat No. MIG-18 allotted to the petitioner at Dalpatpur in the town of Arrah. It is the case of the petitioner that he has deposited the instalments from 1996 but could not deposit the instalments in the year 1998 for reasons beyond his control but again commenced deposit of his instalments from 1999 till 2001. Further grievance is sought to be raised about quality of the construction etc. not being in accordance with the agreement leading the petitioner to incur additional expenses. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents. On going through the same it appears that the matter is primarily one of accounting and the respective liability of the parties under the agreement. Counsel for the parties have no objection to the disposal of this application by referring the same to the Price Fixation Committee of the respondent Board for adjudication of the controversy and after due opportunity to the petitioner also, including personal hearing if he so requests, decide the matter by a reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt and/or presentation of a copy of this order. Needless to state that till such adjudication is not done question of any cancellation of the allotment simply does not arise. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)