1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Criminal Revision Application No. 166 of 2005 Srinivas s/o Ramlu Taumwar, Major, Occ. Carpenter, R/o Srinagar, Nanded Applicant V E R S U S 1. The State of Maharashtra 2. Maroti s/o Khandoji Shankpale, Major, Occupation Business, Resident of Srinagar, Nanded Respondents Mr. S.S.Panale, Advocate for the applicant Mr. S.N. Kendre, APP for the respondent No.1/ State Mr. Swapnil S. Patil, Advocate for the respondent No.2 CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATED : 6th October , 2010 PER COURT : The parties are present before the Court and are identified by their Advocates. The parties have filed minutes of compromise. This was a case under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, in which the applicant / accused was convicted concurrently by the Courts below. The parties have now settled the dispute and the entire cheque amount and the compensation amount has been paid to the respondent / complainant. In view of this, as per the compromise pursis, Criminal Revision Application is allowed partly. The substantive sentence awarded to the applicant / accused is set aside. Rest of the impugned Judgment shall remain intact. The minutes of compromise are taken on record and marked as ‘X’. In view of disposal of Criminal Revision Application No.166 of 2005, Criminal Application No. 4526 of 2009 stands disposed of. ( A.V. NIRGUDE, J. ) SRM* 2