IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 11TH AUGUST 2008 / 20TH SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 24081 of 2008(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- JOHNY.P.I., NEDUMPAMPAKUDA PUTHENPURAYIL PAMPAKUDA, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.P.JACOB RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. PAMPAKUDA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PAMPAKUDA, ERNAKULAM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.W.D., MUVATTUPUZHA DIVISION, MUVATTUPUZHA. 3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANADU, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY 4. ANU KUTTAPPAN, KOTTAPURAYIDATHIL, PAMPAKUDA, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 24081 OF 2008 P ==================== Dated this the 11th day of August, 2008 J U D G M E N T Raising objections against the construction of a bus stop stated to be erected infront of the petitioners residential premises, petitioner states that he has filed Exts. P1 and P2 before the 1st respondent. Despite this, it is complained that orders have not been passed and therefore this writ petition. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, Exts. P1 and P2 have been received by the 1st respondent, necessarily that shall be considered and orders shall be passed with notice to the petitioner and also the 4th respondent. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 4 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp