1 1002.11ao.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Appeal from Order No. 1002 of 2011 WITH Civil Application No. 1343 of 2011 in AO No. 1002/2011 Mr. George Anthony Pinto ....Appellant v/s. Mrs. Mable Anthansio Pinto ....Respondent Mr. Manojkumar Upadhyay for the appellant. Mr. Faroz Bharucha i/b. Dhiren H. Shah for the respondent. CORAM: R.M. BORDE, J. 21st September, 2011 PC: This Appeal from Order is directed against the order passed by the Judge, City Civil Court on 28th July, 2011. As a result of absence of the Counsel appearing for the plaintiff the matter was adjourned and the Court refused to continue interim-relief granted earlier. It is informed that the matter is prescribed for hearing on 11th October, 2011. The parties would have liberty to argue the matter on the given date and it would be for the trial Court to hear the arguments and pass appropriate orders in the matter. 2. In the meanwhile, if the plaintiff is of the opinion that there is emergent situation and is required to obtain extension of interim-relief, he may move the Court with an appropriate application after giving notice to the Counsel appearing for other side and the Court would be obliged to consider such an application, if made even prior to prescribed date of hearing. 2 1002.11ao.sxw 3. With these directions, the Appeal from Order stands disposed of. 4. In view of disposal of appeal from order, pending civil application does not survive and stand disposed of. (R.M.BORDE, J)