:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.67 OF 2006 CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.67 OF 2006 CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.67 OF 2006 Mahadev Hamal Sahakari Mazoor Sanstha, Mangalwedha ...Applicant. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.S.S.Patwardhan , adv. for the Applicant. Mr.S.M.Oka , adv. for the Respondent No.4. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 28th April, 2008. DATE: 28th April, 2008. DATE: 28th April, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. After some discussion at the bar, the learned counsel for the Revision Applicant, who is original defendant no.4, concedes that before the trial Court reliance appears to have been placed on Section 27-A of the Maharashtra Mathadi Hamal & Other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment & Welfare) for exclusion of jurisdiction of the Civil Court. Section 27A is only immunity clause and does not exclude jurisdiction of the Civil Court. The learned counsel points out that under Section 3(2)(k) and (k-i), there is a provision for constitution of persons or authorities responsible for administration of schemes and for their powers and duties and also for providing appeals and revision applications, etc. The learned counsel concedes that the scheme does not appear to have been placed before :2: the trial Court. The scheme could show whether jurisdiction of the civil Court was impliedly excluded. In view of this, the learned counsel seeks to withdraw this Revision Application with liberty to move a fresh application before the trial Court under Section 9A of the Civil Procedure Code if the scheme really provides for mechanism to redress the grievances of the concerned parties. 2. In view of the above, revision application stands disposed off as withdrawn with liberty to the defendant no.4 to file a fresh application under Section 9A before the trial Court within six weeks from this day. The trial Court shall not hear application of the plaintiff for interim relief for six weeks from this day and if the defendant no.4 files a fresh application under Section 9A, the question of jurisdiction shall be disposed off afresh in the light of the scheme. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)