IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17784 of 2009 2 17.12.2009 Ramjeet Ram, Son of Lautan Ram, resident of Village- Dakshin Tola Manjhi, P.S. Manjhi, District Saran ... Petitioner VERSUS 1. The State of Bihar 2. The District Magistrate, Chapra 3. The District Superintendent of Education, Chapra 4. The Block Education Officer, Manjhi 5. The Headmaster, Madhya Vidyalaya, Raghunath Girike Mathiya, P.S. Manjhi, District Saran 6. Mahmud Alam Khan, Block Teacher, Madhya Vidyalaya, Raghunath Girike Mathiya, P.S. Manjhi, District Manjhi ..... Respondents ------ Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner claims to be an Assistant Teacher in Government Middle School, Raghunath Girike Mathiya, Manjhi, Saran. He has raised a grievance that respondent no.6, Mahmud Alam Khan, is not attending to his duties as a Teacher in that school for long but is being regularly paid salary by the Headmaster, respondent no.5, on account of connivance and the loss is to the students as well as to public exchequer. Considering the nature of grievance, we are of the view that the allegations need to be inquired into by the 2 concerned authorities themselves. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty that petitioner may again approach the District Magistrate, Chapra, respondent no.2, and the District Superintendent of Education, Chapra, respondent no.3, who shall get the matter inquired into and take appropriate decision as per law expeditiously, preferably within three months. If the allegations are found false and vexatious then the concerned authorities may decide to take some disciplinary action against the petitioner for wasting time of the Court and the authorities. (Shiva Kirti Singh,ACJ) (Shyam Kishore Sharma,J.) sk