IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 794 of 2011. Decided on: 4.3.2011. Kushal Chand ….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others .…Respondents The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. ( Oral ) The petitioner claims work charge status from the date he completed 10 years of service. Reliance is placed on the decision of the Supreme Court rendered in Mool Raj Upadhyaya vs. State of H.P. and others, 1994 Supp. (2) SCC 316. 2. The learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. The petitioner may file appropriate representation furnishing all factual details before the second respondent within a period of one month from today. The second respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, in the light also of the decision, referred to above, within a period of another four months. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of this judgment referred to in this judgment while submitting the representation. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. March 4, 2011 (Justice Rajiv Sharma) (sck/hl) Judge.