1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1359 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO.1239 OF 2010 Mrs.Vijayalaxmi Dinesh Jadhav .. Plaintiff Vs. Smt.Sunita widow of Late Laxman Bhalerao & Ors. . Defendants Mr.A.M.Ranpise for the plaintiff CORAM : S.C.Dharmadhikari, J. DATE : September 2, 2010 P.C. : 1. In para 16 of the affidavit in reply, the defendant no.1 has stated as under: 16. As regards para No.14, this defendant says and submits that “ since the plaintiff have no locus standi in the matter her prayer is liable to be rejected. This defendant further submits that since this defendant is entirely depending upon the said suit shop for her livelihood with three small school going children and only one room to stay, this defendant cannot even think of disposing the said suit shop or room and therefore, this defendant had already made a statement before his Hon ble Court that she has no intention to ’ 2 transfer or create any third party rights in the suit room or shop.” 2. In the light of this statement made on affidavit, ad interim order can be confirmed. All other defendants are served but they are not contesting the motion. Motion is made absolute in terms of the statement recorded in the ad interim order and in the para reproduced hereinabove. The defendants shall not transfer, or create third party right, so also part with possession of the suit shop described in Exhibit 'J' to the plaint till the hearing and final disposal of the suit. Liberty to apply for other reliefs. ( S.C.Dharmadhikari, J. )