IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 3RD NOVEMBER 2008 / 12TH KARTHIKA 1930 RP.No. 1157 of 2008() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.21942/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. THE ACCOUNTS OFFICER, KERALA PANCHAYAT EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT (ANNEXE), CORPORATION BUILDING, OPPOSITE SMV SCHOOL, TVM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT, KOTTAYAM 3. THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER, KOTTAYAM BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SUDHA DEVI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. V.A.ALICE, VATTUKULATHIL HOUSE, NEENDOOR P.O., KOTTAYAM 2. THE SECRETARY, ETTUMANOOR GRAMA PANCHAYAT P.O., KOTTAYAM THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- R.P.1157/2008 in W.P.(C).21942/2007 -------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of November, 2008 ORDER I do not find any grounds to interfere with the judgment. The only direction in the judgment was to the first respondent to verify whether the amounts availed by the petitioner from her Provident Fund account were repaid by her and if it had been repaid, the balance amount due to the petitioner shall be disbursed within the time frame indicated therein. The direction is intended only to see that the amounts, which are actually due are disbursed within the time frame. If on verification, it is found that no amounts are due, obviously no amounts are due as such. This does not require any review of the judgment. Subject to the clarification made above, Review Petition is disposed of. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs