^ '^@-( -sr^- >- m THE HON'BLE WGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BHASPUR ^C.G.l WRITPEmTION {S)NO. 5L 6 5 | QF 2009 PETITIONER ^)?^--" fc^.y <>'.-"^^ .^ ./y '^ ^ ^.•'" ^/ ^, RESPONDENTS il. -2. Smt. Psltima Ghritlahare W/Q. Shri Vmay Kuniar, Aged About 33 years, Occupation- Senrfce^ Posted as Guruji, at Govemment Primary School Derhakampa, Vikash Khand Lormi, Tahsil - Lormi, Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS The State of Chfaattisgarh, through the Secretary Departdent ofPanchayat and Riiral Development, Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) The Director, Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Clihattisgarh Raipur, D. K. S. Building Raipur, Distt.- Raipur ( C. G. ) The District Pariyojna Saaianvayak Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission Bilaspur, Distt^- Bilaspur (C.G.) Chief Executive of&cer Janpad Panchayat Lormi, Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTmjTION OF INDIA ^ r>)^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRITPETITION (Sl N0.2681/2009 PETITIONER Smt. Pratima Ghritlahare RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: - Shri Sunil Sahu, counsel for the petitioner. Shri A. V. Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No.1. Shri A. S. Kachhawaha, counsel for respondents No.2 & 3. ORDER(ORAU (Passed on this 11tn day of November, 2009) 1. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties; the petition is heard finally. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in view of the order dated 24-09-2008 and 05-11-2009 (Annexure-R-2/3 and Annexure-R-2/4) passed by the Deputy Secretary, Department of School Education, State of Chhattisgarh, on account of extenslon of time, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication as the petitioner has already obtained the requisite qualification. 3. Learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 & 3 by filing return on 10-11-20C® annexing documents Annexure R-2/1 to R-2/4 submite that they have no objection. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge Tumane