1 Mgn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.159 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6227 OF 2009 Dr. Anagha Bhat Behere...Petitioner Vs. The University of Pune & Ors..Respondents Mr. Virendra V. Tulzapurkar, Senior Advocate i/b. Shri Prathamesh A. Gokhale, for the Petitioner. Mr. Girish Kulkarni i/b. Mrs. M.G. Kulkarni, for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. C.R. Sonawane, AGP for respondent No.3. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & K.K.TATED, JJ. DATED: 11TH FEBRUARY,2010 P.C. Heard parties. In our opinion, considering the communication dated 11th February, 2010 which is placed on record on behalf of the University of Pune, this Review Petition can be disposed of. Paragraphs 2 and 3 of the said communication read as under:- 2 “2.It may be relevant to mention that the selection process pursuant to the said advertisement dated 1.10.2008 has come to an end. None of the candidates, including petitioner, applying for the said post of the Reader was qualified. Hence, the University now propose to hold the fresh selection process in future. 3. You are requested to make a submission on behalf of the University that if the Petitioner applies for the post of Reader in future, the University would get her application scrutinized by the appropriate Scrutiny Committee consisting of an expert in the field, provided the Petitioner submits all her publications as contained in her application.” Considering the said paragraphs it will be clear that if the petitioner applies hereinafter the application will be considered by the appropriate Scrutiny Committee. 3 2. Considering that the main grievance of the petitioner has been met, in our opinion, nothing further survives in the Review Petition, which is accordingly disposed off. (K.K. TATED, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)