1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.225/2009 Applicant :- Rakesh s/o Munna Prajapati Aged about 21 years, Occ. Service, R/o 318/C, Railway Quarter, Ajni, Nagpur ...Versus... Respondent :- The State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. Mouda, Dist. Nagpur. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Shri R.M. Daga, Adv. for applicant] [Shri A.D. Sonak, APP for respondent] CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 04.01.2010 Heard. Learned Counsel for the applicant pointing out chargesheet argued that there is no material whatsoever against the applicant to ask him to face the trial for the offence of murder. The trial Court has relied on the statement of co-accused persons who have categorically stated that the applicant was with them when the murder was committed and as a matter of fact they together committed the murder. This may not be a good piece of evidence against the applicant but then the entire case of the prosecution will have to be placed 2 before the trial Court in order to appreciate the applicant’s contention about his non-involvement in the offence of murder. In view of this, following order would subserve the ends of justice. Criminal Revision Application is disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to take up the trial in the peculiar facts of the present case and decide the same as early as possible and in any case within a period of four months from today. JUDGE SSW