IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11377 of 2011 Bijit Kumar & Ors Versus Most.Sudama Devi & Anr ----------- 03. 26.07.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel, Mr. J.S.Arora appearing on behalf of the respondents. This writ application has been filed against the order dated 11.04.2011 passed by Subordinate Judge IV, Patna in Title Suit No.182 of 2008 as contained in Annexure-6 whereby the learned Court below refused to make enquiry under Section 340 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that since the allegation by the petitioner is that the respondents have committed interpolation in the plaint, the learned Court below should have made preliminary enquiry under Section 340 of the Code of Civil Procedure and should have made a complaint thereafter. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the learned Court below found that the allegation made by the petitioner is baseless. This observation has been made after looking into the plaint which was received from the Subordinate Judge 1st, Patna and held that no enquiry is required. 2 In such view of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India as neither failure of justice nor grave injustice has occasioned because of impugned order. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. Saurabh (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)