IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22010 of 2011 Vidya Sagar Pandey, son of Late Ramjee Pandey, resident of Mohalla Dadar Mandir, Police Station Alamganj, District Patna. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Health Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director, Health Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Principal, Patna Dental College and Hospital, Patna. 4. The Account Officer, Patna Dental College and Hospital, Patna. 5. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2. 12.12.2011. Heard Shri Manish Kumar No.2, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Pankaj Kumar Jha, learned A.C. to S.C.12, who appears on behalf of respondent nos.1 to 4 and Shri Dhanendra Chaubey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.5/Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. The petitioner, who retired on 31.12.2009 from the post of Presser from Patna Dental College and Hospital, Patna, has prayed for directing the respondents to pay remaining retiral dues, which has been particularly stated in paragraph-5 of the writ petition as follows :- (i) Part of L.I.C. (ii) Part of Leave Encashment (iii) Gratuity as per new pay scale (iv) Arrear of A.C.P. 2 (v) Arrear of Pension along with other retiral dues and also to pay interest. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the relief sought for in the present writ petition, the petitioner has filed representation before respondent no.3/Principal, Patna Dental College and Hospital, Patna. However, till date, neither any decision has been taken on his representation nor dues have been cleared. In view of the facts and circumstances, the court is of the opinion that writ petition can be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh detailed representation in respect of claim made in the present writ petition before respondent no.3/The Principal, Patna Dental College and Hospital within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, respondent no.3 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of filing of such representation. If respondent no.3 considers the claim of the 3 petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for clearing the dues within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, the respondent no.3 is required to pass a speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within two months from the date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)