IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 24TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 33651 of 2009(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ SHEENA K.K., LD CLERK,THIRUVALLUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, THIRUVALLUR P.O.,VADAKARA VIA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.E.NARAYANAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THE LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, THE DEPARTMENT OF IRRIGATION AND ADMINISTRATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, THE LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.NANDAKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 33651 OF 2009 (B) ===================== Dated this the 24th day of November, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner joined the office of the Superintending Engineer, Irrigation, North Circle, Kozhikdoe as LD Clerk. Subsequently, in 2002, she was deployed for two years to a Grama Panchayat. Although, on completion of the term of deployment, she was ordered to be repatriated to her parent department, despite Ext.P5 order issued by the Government on 5/9/2008 directing repatriation of employees like the petitioner, making appointment to the post to be vacated by them, it is complained that the 3rd respondent has not taken any action on Ext.P5. 2. It is seen that complaining of the above, petitioner has also moved the 3rd respondent by filing Exts.P6 and P7. If as stated, by Ext.P5, Government have issued directions concerning the case of the employees like the petitioner, there is no reason why the 3rd respondent shall not take appropriate consequential action in the matter. 3. In any case, having regard to the pendency of Exts.P6 WPC 33651/09 :2 : and P7 before the 3rd respondent, I direct the 3rd respondent to take appropriate action on the representations made by the petitioner duly adverting to Ext.P5 and as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 6 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp