IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH MAY 2008 / 7TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 6918 of 2007(W) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ LEELAMMA, KOTTAL THARAYIL, AGED 5 YEARS, W/O.DAMODARAN NAIR, KOTTAL THARAYIL, PATHIYOORKALA, PATHIYOOR VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.RENJITHKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA. 2. SOUTHERN RAILWAYS, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER, ERNAKULAM. ADDITIONAL RESPONDENTS 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (CONSTRUCTIONS), SOUTHERN RAILWAYS OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (NEAR RAILWAY KALYANA MANDAPAM) KOLLAM 4. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (CONSTRUCTION) OFICE OF THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SOUTHERN RAILWAYS NEAR RAILWAY STATION, KAYAMKULAM Additional R3 and R4 are impleaded vide order dated 11-4-07 in I.A.No.5334/07 5. DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER (CONSTRUCTIONS), SOUTHERN RAILWAYS ERNAKULAM Additional R5 impleaded vide order dated 18-7-07 in I.A.No.9452/07 BY ADV. SRI.SUBAL J.PAUL, SC, RAILWAYS FOR R.2 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BASANTH BALAJI FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.(C)NO.6918/07 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF DECREE DATED 22-12-1995 IN L.A.R.559/91 OF SUB COURT, MAVELIKKARA. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF E.P.NO.204/03 IN L.A.R.NO.559/91 FILED BY THE PETITIONER. /True Copy/ PA to Judge. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(c).No.6918 OF 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 28th day of May, 2008 JUDGMENT The standing counsel for the Railways is absent. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though time frame set by this court in its order dated 14/1/2008 has expired, Railways has not so far deposited the amounts mentioned in the order, before the Execution Court. It is seen that the above interim order virtually grants to the petitioner the final relief which is sought for in the writ petition. Since no explanation is offered by the Railways as to why that interim order has not been complied with, I dispose of the writ petition itself confirming that interim order. The respondents 3 to 5 shall deposit the amounts mentioned in that interim order within one month from today. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE JUDGE sv.