IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.12421 of 2010 Date of Decision : July 29, 2010. Yogesh Chander Malhotra and another .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Vaneet Soni, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners seek a direction to the respondents for allotment of plot to them at the reserved price prevalent at the time of acquisition of their land by the Improvement Trust, Jalandhar for 110 Acres Scheme. It is averred that the land measuring 9 marlas 87 square feet, bearing plot No.25 in Satnam Nagar, Jalandhar and purchased by the father of the petitioners on 13.7.1973, was acquired for 110 Acres Scheme launched by the Trust on 3.9.1974. The petitioners have referred to and relied upon a long correspondence with the Improvement Trust in order to contend that principally the Trust has already agreed to allot a plot measuring 6 marlas, as is apparent from the memo dated 13.9.1991 (Annexure P-5), but no formal allotment has been made so far despite C.W.P.No .12421 of 2010 2 repeated representations made by the petitioners, including dated 7.7.2007 (Annexure P-27). Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, however, without expressing any views on the merits of the petitioners' claim, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to consider the pending claim of the petitioners regarding allotment of the plot, as noticed above, and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. July 29, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE