IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 25496 of 2005 Between: 1. Ramaswamy S/o. Krishtayya R/o. Chittayya Valasa (V), Gajapathinagaram Mandalam Vijayanagaram District. 2. Ramulamma W/o. Sanyasappadu R/o. Chittayya Valasa (V), Gajapathinagaram Mandalam Vijayanagaram District. 3 Pinninti Satyam S/o. Ramaswamy R/o. Chittayya Valasa (V), Gajapathinagaram Mandalam Vijayanagaram District. 4 Sriripurapu Krishna S/o. Narayana R/o. Chittayya Valasa (V), Gajapathinagaram Mandalam Vijayanagaram District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 M/s. Vijaya Rama Gajapati Co-operative Sugars Limited., rep.by its General Managar, Kumaram Village, Jami Mandal, Vizianagaram District. 2 The Assessment Cane Commissioner & Licensing Authority Bobbili, Vizianagaram District. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the crushing activities of the petitioners to crush their sugarcane raised by them in their own land by their crushers as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents herein not to interfere with the crushing activities of the petitioners by their own crushing units, and direct the 2nd respondent and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.TADDI.NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR AGRICULTURE The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel for petitioners has submitted that the subject matter of the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. ___________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 14th July, 2009 CBS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 25496 of 2005 14th July, 2009 CBS