1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29/06/2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN Writ Petition (MD) No.6917 of 2011 K.Nallammal ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 2.The District Project Officer, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to disburse entire terminal benefits of the petitioner with interest. For petitioner ...Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu For Respondents ...Mr.S.Chandrasekar Government Advocate O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. 2. By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing. 3. The petitioner has come up with the present writ petition for a mandamus directing the respondents to disburse entire terminal benefits of the petitioner with interest. 4. The case of the petitioner is that she was appointed as Anganwadi Assistant on 19.03.1983 by the Taluk Project Nutrition Officer, Kamuthi, in his proceeding in Na.Ka.No.26/A/82. Right from the date of inclusion of the service, the service rendeed by her was meritorious. She retired from service on 31.10.2009 on attaining the age of superannuation. She was placed under suspension in the year 2007 and therefore, she is https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 constrained to approach this Court by filing a writ petition in W.P.(MD) No.12169 of 2009. Later, the first respondent treated the period of suspension as punishment, revoked the order of suspension by proceeding dated 20.01.2010. On attaining the age of superannuation, she was relieved from service by the second respondent in proceeding dated 31.10.2009. But in spite of lapse of one and a half years, her terminal benefits was not settled to her. Therefore, she was constrained to send a representation dated 13.11.2006 to settle the terminal benefits to her. However, the said representation was not considered so far and hence she has come up with the present writ petition for the relief stated earlier. Considering the limited scope of the matter, without expressing any opinion on the claim made by the petitioner, I direct the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Writ Petition is ordered accordingly. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar(Accounts) /True copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Collector Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 2.The District Project Officer, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. +1 CC to M/s G.Thalaimutharasu, Advocate, SR.No.20798 +1 CC to the Special Government Pleader, SR.No.20886 RR W.P.(MD) No.6917 of 2011 29.06.2011 TR : 14.07.2011 : 2p/5c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/