IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS TUESDAY, THE 15TH MARCH 2011 / 24TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(Crl.).No. 124 of 2011(S) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): --------------------- VASAVAN PILLAI, S/O.PARAMESWARAN PILLAI, VISHNU BHAVANAM, MUTHUKATTUKARA, PALAMEL VILLAGE, NOOORANADI.P.O, MAVELIKKARA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.RASHEED C.NOORANAD RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NOORNAD, ALAPPZHA DISTRICT, PIN-690 504. 2. SREEJITH, S/O. VASUDEVAN, KULANJIYIL, NEDU KULANJI MURI, PADANILAM.P.O, NOORANAD VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN-690 529. 3. VASUDEVAN, KULANJIYIL, NEDU KULANJI MURI, PADANILAM.P.O, NOORANAD VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN-690 529. R1 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.M.KAMMAPPU. THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(CRl) No.124 of 2011-S ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 15th day of March, 2011 J U D G M E N T K.M.Joseph, J. Petitioner is the father of the alleged detenu. Detention is alleged against the 2nd respondent. Today, the alleged detenu and the 2nd respondent were present, so were petitioner and his wife. The alleged detenu would say that she was in love with the 2nd respondent and what is more they have married as per the Hindu rites on 5.3.2011 at Kalavamkodam Puthukkattukunnel Sree Saktheeswara Kshethram. This is the version of the 2nd respondent also. 2. We heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. The learned counsel for the party respondents also made available the certificate issued by the temple authorities and also the certificate issued by the Vayalar Panchayat. Learned counsel for the 3rd respondent submits that copy of the certificates will be produced. 3. The 2nd respondent would point out that there WPCR 124/2011 -2- is threat from the relatives of the petitioner. Petitioner and his wife would say that there will be no threat by them. Learned Government Pleader would submit that protection will be given for the lives of the alleged detenu and the 2nd respondent from the petitioner or his men for a period of one month. For production of certificate call on 18.3.2011. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. (M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS) JUDGE. MS