IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 19TH JANUARY 2009 / 29TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 37792 of 2008(Y) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- E.G. MOHANAN, S/O. GOVINDAN, ETTIYATHIPARAMBU THUNDATHIN KADAVU, VARAPUZHA VILLAGE, NORTH PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.VELLAYANI SUNDARARAJU, SRI.P.MEENAKUMARI, SRI.K.J.VINCENT. RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. THE RURAL POLICE SUPERINTENDENT, OFFICE OF THE RURAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALUVA. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VARAPUZHA POLICE STATION, VARAPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. PADMINI, W/O. SIVAN, ITTIYATHIPARAMBU, THUNDATHINKADAVU, VARAPUZHA VILLAGE, NORTH PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. BIJU @ SABU, S/O. MADHAVAN, ETTIYATHIPARAMBU, CHIRACKAKAM, VARAPPUZHA VILLAGE, NORTH PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. BENJAMIN PAUL, R3 & R4 BY ADV. SRI.MANSOOR.B.H. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/01/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.37792/2008-Y: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN O.S. 473/07 DT. 26/07/2008 OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, NORTH PARAVUR. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE COMMISSION REPORT AND PLAN IN I.A. 1712/07 IN O.S. 473/07. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.2. DT. 05/11/2008. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.1. DTD. 12/12/08. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER FROM 1ST RESPONDENT'S OFFICE DTD. 12/12/08. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. prv. J.B. Koshy,Ag.C.J. & V. Giri, J. -------------------------------------- W.P. © No. 37792 of 2008 Y --------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of January, 2009 Judgment Koshy,Ag.C.J. This is a petition for police protection. It is the allegation that petitioner's house is being destroyed by respondent Nos.3 and 4. It is the contention of respondent Nos.3 and 4 that petitioner's father sold the property to third respondent and third respondent, in turn, sold the same to fourth respondent. In any event, these are civil disputes. Petitioner obtained an experte judgment, Ext.P1 in the year 2008 against fourth respondent and no steps are taken to set aside the exparte judgment. In the above circumstances, we direct the police to see that law and order is maintained and decree of the court is respected unless it is interfered with according to law. Police shall consider Ext.P4 complaint and take appropriate action, if the allegations are correct. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. J.B.Koshy Acting Chief Justice V. Giri Judge vaa