THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 17822 of 2004 DATED: 04-10-2005 Between: G. Sudhakara Reddy, Son of Narapa Reddy, Aged 48 years, F.P. Shop Dealer, Gatkur Village, Kudair Mandal, Anantapur District ……Petitioner AND 1.The Revenue Divisional officer, Anantapur and another ….Respondents THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 17822 of 2004 ORDER: This writ petition is filed questioning the order dated 28-08-2004 passed by the first respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer, Anantapur. As can be seen from the material on record, the writ petitioner is a fair price dealer of Gotkur Village. Under the impugned order, while suspending the authorization of the petitioner pending enquiry into certain alleged irregularities, the petitioner was called upon to explain as to why the authorization should not be cancelled. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and particularly, keeping in view the scope of the controversy involved in the writ petition, I am of the view that it is for the first respondent to make the necessary enquiry as to the alleged irregularities and to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law on merits. It is neither proper nor possible for this Court to go into the correctness of the said allegations. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to conclude the enquiry initiated against the petitioner and to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, if not already completed, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. -------------------------- 04th October, 2005 bud