BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAR $1?? AT BILASPUR mgbem TAX CASE Nofl/C W“ ? E APPELLANT rAM (Commissioner of Income Tax, Raipur my“ 1%” RE PONDENT ’ (/Rajendra Kumar Jain, Proprietor : M/s. Saheh' Jewellers, Supela, Bhilai. ‘ .u AH’EAL U/s. igem OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1964 XI-HC—78 W (Fk7f.c»f qé/gm WW...m&.c@geuggg)AX§Q2oogL WW(WQ) Wmww WW§wm§x agaimm Div‘ision'Bench: Hcm‘. smi Dhirendra Mishra & Hcm. Shri R.N. Chandrakar, JJ. sci-6.2009:- ‘ Shri S. Rajeshwara Rao, a " ‘The matter is listed on defa l Learned counsel for the )unsel for the appellant. ult. weeks; time to remove the defaul . ppellant prays for and is granted 4 ‘ If the default is not rem ap‘peai shail automatically stand the Bencl//.//f‘ sai— yum—$5 / ,e‘”\ RA ‘ D Judge Barve ved within‘ the aforesaid period, the dismissed withoutfurther reference to Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge a$pi$§ c §$a§....%w..$®.,.m% N8 g gwagAHmJmAmy xkiaw ¢ gm nbka w ‘ DR,“ .ug $ 333‘ §§X$AuuhQ . VHVWYNMe1» gkaa 3% &RW4W Qc§$\ %& »:%m ‘4, . §§WK§