BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twentieth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.16671 of 2011 S.KARUPPASAMY : PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TIRUNELVELI TOWN POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.608/2011 : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. J.JEYAKUMARAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr. K.S.DURAI PANDIAN Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner who is the accused No.2 in Cr.No.608 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for offence punishable under Section 366(A) of I.P.C later altered into Section 376 of I.P.C, apprehending arrest, at the hands of the respondent police, is before this Court seeking anticipatory bail. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. According to the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the allegation against the petitioner is in respect of 366(A) of I.P.C and he is in no way connected with 376 of I.P.C. The further overt act is that he has sent the first accused as well as the victim girl to go to some other place away from the parents of the victim girl. Now, the victim girl has been secured and restored to the de facto complainant. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the victim girl has been secured and restored to the de facto complainant. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5. Considering the submissions made by both sides, I could see that there is a prima facie case for the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail, since he is not connected with the offence under Section 376(A). Accordingly, anticipatory bail, is granted to the petitioner, with the following conditions: 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, No.IV, Tirunelveli, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 20/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.4, TIRUNELVELI. 2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUNELVELI TOWN POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. +1 CC to M/S. J.JEYAKUMARAN Advocate SR.No.44749 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16671 of 2011 Date :20/12/2011 NSV/22.12.11/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/