IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1469 of 2007 BRAJESH KUMAR & ANR Versus THE B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- 02/ 18.07.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the B.R. A. Bihar University. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievance of petitioner no.1 has been redressed, as he had filed a representation before the Chancellor of the University but the grievance of petitioner no.2 has not been redressed. The claim of petitioner no.2 is that he appeared in the examination of LL.B. Part-I in the year 1999 but the result has not been declared so far. However, from the materials available on record, it is quite apparent that petitioner no.2 never moved before the authorities concerned and only after about eight years he has filed the instant writ petition. Courts are meant for those who are vigilant and not for those who are indolent and sleepy. Furthermore, writ petitions have to be filed within a reasonable time but the delay of eight years cannot in any way be deemed to be a reasonable period specially in the facts and circumstances of this case. In the said circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed. harish/ (S.N.Hussain, J.)