RESPONDENTS Sahu HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (Q No. 6524 of2006 PETITIONERS : 1. Pratap Rai Son of Shri Anand Ram Aged about 70 yeai's. 2. Sushil Son ofShri Pratap Rai aged about years. Both are residents of village Charama, District Kanker VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary Nagariya Nikay, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (CG). 2. CoUeetor,Kanker,DistrictKatiker(CG). 3. Nagar Paichayat Charama, Through Chief Municipal QfBcer, Nagar Panchayat Charama, Distriet Kanker (CG). 4. Tehsildar Charama, District Kanker. 5. Police Station Charama, through its Station House OfGcer, Charama, District Kanker (CG). 6. Public Works Department, Through its Sub Divisional Qflicer, PWD Charama, District Kanker (CG). (WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTI-IUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'Ue Mr. Satish K. Aenihotri. J.) iresent : Shri Awadh Tripathi, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Vivek Sharma, Panel Lawyer forthe State. ORALORDER (Passed on 14 day of November, 2008) 1. Leamed counsel appearing tbr the petitioners, on mstmction, seeks pennission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to appropriate fonun, ifa cause ofaction still survives. It is ordered. 2. The petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with fhe above stated liberty. No order as to costs. 3. Consequently, M(W)P No. 4771/06, application for grant of interim relief stand disposed of —— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge •^--^si.^'at^S?mSS".^;?5^ .;.^ •: