IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 4653 of 2005 Between: 1 A. Narasimharao, S/o. Venkatarao, R/o. Dammapet * V&M), Khammam District. 2 G. Venkateswararao, S/o. Muttaiah, R/o. Peda Gollagudem Vill, Dammapet Mandal, Khammam District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 State of A.P., rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 Superintendent of Police, Khammam District, Khammam. 3 Sub-Divisional Police Office, Sathupalli Division, Sathupalli Mandal, Khammam District. 4 Station House Officer, Dammapet P.S., Dammapet Mandal, Khammam District. 5 Gannarapu Gopalam, S/o. Chinnaiah, R/o. Mondiverra Colony, Dammapet Mandal, Khammam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to Issue a writ, order or direction more particualrly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respodnents in not initiating any action on the report, Dt. 19.2.2005 is illegal, irregular and offends the provisions of Articles 14, 21 and 300- A of constitution of India and violative of provisions of Code Criminal procedure and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 to take necessary action against the 5th respondent and on the said report and to protect the life, liberty and property of the petitioenrs in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.5: The Court made the following : ORDER: The petitioners seek a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not initiating any action on the report dated 19.02.2005, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently to direct the respondents 1 to 4 to take necessary action against the 5th respondent. Heard. Perused the records. Having regard to the facts of the case and in view of the interim orders dated 14.03.2005 in W.P.M.P.No.6217 of 2005 passed by this Court, I am of the opinion that no further orders need be passed in this writ petition and hence, the writ petition is liable to be disposed of in terms of the said interim order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the interim orders dated 14.03.2005 in W.P.M.P.No.6217 of 2005 passed by this Court. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. Date:03.03.2008 Ccm To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{JGK}