IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3519 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2007 M/s.Raj Products )..Applicant Versus M/s.Shubham Traders & Anr. )..Respondents ---- Mr.Sanjay Kshirsagar for the applicant. Mr.Nitin Mulye for respondent no.1. Mrs.A.A.Mane APP for the State. ---- Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Date : 29.08.2008 PC 1. Heard both sides. This is an application for leave to appeal. The accused has been acquitted for an offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The ground for acquittal is that after the cheque bounced, two payments were made. However, in the demand notice the amount demanded did not take into account the payments made. The demand was very excessive. The view taken is a possible view. I am not inclined to interfere in an appeal against acquittal. Hence, leave refused. Consequently, appeal papers to be filed. : 2 : (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J)