1 ABA 110-2011 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.110 OF 2011 Savita Krishnadev Gavade ..Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.J.D.Mane, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs.A.A.Mane, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 1ST MARCH, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. This is an application for bail by 22 years old housewife, who apprehends arrest in connection with C.R.No.6 of 2011 for the offence punishable under Sections 109, 363, 366(A) & 376 of the Indian Penal Code registered with Sangola Police Station, who advised 15 years 9 months victim belonging to different community to marry the main accused 2 ABA 110-2011 in the case and go with him. The girl has been brought from the custody of the main accused and now she is with her father. 3. In view of this, applicant's being in custody for the purpose of investigation may not be necessary. In the event of arrest, applicant be released on bail on her furnishing P.R.Bond of Rs.25,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate sum of Rs.25,000/- on the following conditions. (i) The applicant shall report at the Sangola Police Station for interrogation on 7th March, 2011 in between 10.00 a.m. to 1.00 p.m. and thereafter, as and when required by the investigating officer. (ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. 4. Anticipatory Bail Application is disposed of. 3 ABA 110-2011 . The order will remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge sheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court dated 2nd December, 2010 delivered in Special Leave Petition (Cri.) No.7615 of 2009 (Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs State of Maharashtra And Ors.). (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)