IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16947 of 2010 CHINTA DEVI W/O- LATE CHOTEY R/O- YARPUR AMBEDKAR COLONY P.S.- GARDNIBAGH DISTRICT- PATNA Versus 1. PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH IT’S MAYOR, BUDH MARG PATNA 2. MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER CUM CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BUDH MARG, PATNA. 3. CHIEF ACCOUNT’S OFFICER, PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BUDH MARG, PATNA. 4. EXECUTIVE OFFICER NUTAN RAJDHANI ANCHAL PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION 10 HARDING ROAD PATNA. ----------- 2 07.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent corporation. The grievance of the petitioner is that with regard to the revision of family pension. Learned counsel for the Corporation submits that the petitioner has filed the writ application without approaching the concerned authority for redressal of her grievances. In the above circumstances, leaned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the claims as highlighted in the writ application, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 2 within a period of four weeks stating details of the unpaid claims as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of her claims along with the certified copy of the present order. 2 In case such representation is filed, the grievance of the petitioner be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Amrendra/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)