IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-7189 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: September 14, 2011 Amandeep Kaur & another .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. R.S. Malhotra, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for respondent Nos.1 to 3. None for respondent Nos.4 to 6. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. Through this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioners have approached this Court with the plea that they got married, however, respondent Nos.4 to 6 are not accepting the marriage and therefore, are advancing threats to the petitioners. 2. Certain developments have taken place, in so Crl. Misc. No. M-7189 of 2011 [2] much as, learned counsel for the petitioners and respondent-State have pointed out that petitioner No.1, Amandeep Kaur, is now living with respondent Nos.4 to 6, and does not want to join the company of petitioner No.2, Inderjit Singh. 3. In view of changed circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioners contends that let this petition be disposed of as not pressed. 4. The petition is disposed of as not pressed. (AJAI LAMBA) September 14, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?