IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No. 14991 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : SEPTEMBER 24, 2009 KAMALJEET KAUR & ANR. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) This petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to allow the petitioners to continue in service as Part-time/Guest Faculty Lecturers, till such time appointments by regular mode are made. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the issue would be covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in CWP 2571 of Civil Writ Petition No. 14991 of 2009 2 2009 (Seema Aggarwal and others v. State of Punjab and others) decided on 18.2.2009. Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Mr. B.S. Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Heard. Learned counsel for the respondent-State admits that the issue is covered by the judgment of this Court rendered in Seema Aggarwal's case (supra). Learned counsel for the respondent-State states that the State of Punjab has issued instructions not to replace Part-time Lecturers/Guest Faculty Lecturers with persons also serving on temporary basis. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment rendered by this Court in CWP 2571 of 2009 (Seema Aggarwal and others v. State of Punjab and others) decided on 18.2.2009. September 24, 2009 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?