1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. WRIT PETITION NO.276 OF 2007 Heeralal s/o Murlidhar Chaturvedi .. Petitioner v/s. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others .. Respondents Mr. D.S. Chandnani for the petitioner. Mr. A. J. Bhor for the respondent No.1. Mr. Pradeep Jadhav, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent No.2. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO AND R.M. SAVANT, JJ. DATED : 24TH APRIL, 2007 P.C. It is the case of the petitioner that he was tenant in the premises which has been demolished by respondent No.2. The said premises was reconstructed without having due sanction from the respondent No.1. It is his case that his room has not been reconstructed. It is further his case that he has made representation on 12th October, 2006 and till date, it has not been decided. 2. Considering the said controversy, we direct the respondent No.1, after hearing the petitioner as well as respondent No.2, to dispose of the matter according to law at any rate not later than 12 2 weeks from today. With the above observation, petition disposed of. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) (R.M. SAVANT, J.)