IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 24879 of 2007 Between: M/s. Guntur District Milk Producers Mutually Aided Cooperative Union Ltd., Rep. by its Labour Welfare Officer T.Muralidhar S/o. Ranganayakulu aged 46 yrs, R/o.Vadlamudi, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Principal Secretar, Labour Employment Training & Factories (IMS) Department, Secretariat, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Director of Insurance & Medical Services, Musheerabad, Opp. Gandhi Hospital, Hyderabad. 3 The Recovery Officer, Employees State Insurance Corporation, (Department of Central Government), 14-20-27, Padmanabha Buildings, 2nd Floor, Gandhinagar, Vijayawada, Krishna District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing the recovery notices vide proceedings No. 62.Q/09091/4318/2007 dt. 7-11-2007,No. 62.Q/09091/4319/2007 dt. 7- 11-2007 and No. 62. /09091/4320/2007 dt. 7-11-2007 pending exemption notification with the 1st respondent as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to keep all the 3 recovery proceedings dt.7-11-2007 in abeyance till the issuance of the notification by the 1st respondent as per the order of this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 21768/07 dt.1-10-2007 and to pass an order on merits and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.N.RAJESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.24879 of 2007 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is granted. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J September 16, 2009 MD