IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 24948 of 2008 Between: Gali Rama Rao S/o. Seetharamaiah Temples, Yaddanapudi Mandal, Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Endowments Endowments Office, Tilak Road, Hyderabad. 2 The Dy. Commissioner of Endowments Endowments Office, Kothapeta, Guntur, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in not considering the representation made by the petitioner on 2-6- 2008 is against fundamental principles of natural justice Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.POLURIPRABHAKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following : ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for Endowments and at their request the writ petition is taken up for ﬁnal disposal at the admission stage. In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is that he made a representation to the 1st respondent – Commissioner of Endowments on 2.6.2008 through proper channel i.e. Assistant Commissioner of Endowments, Ongole stating that he has been suﬀering from Urinary Bladder Cancer since 2002 and has been undergoing treatment at Indo American Cancer Institute and Research Centre at Hyderabad and his case was also recommended by the Assistant Commissioner, who wrote a letter to the 1st respondent to consider his case on humanitarian grounds but so far no action has been taken on his representation. Hence this writ petition. In the circumstances, since the case of the petitioner was already recommended by the Assistant Commissioner and the representation of the petitioner is still pending consideration before the 1st respondent-Commissioner, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the recommendations of the Assistant Commissioner and pass appropriate orders expeditiously. N.V.RAMANA,J DT.19.11.2008 Note: Furnish CC by tomorrow (B/o)