1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5444 OF 2009 Shri.Raosaheb A. Ingawale. ..Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. Mr. S.R.Borulkar i/by Mr. Manoj Patil, Advocate for the applicant. Mrs. A.A.Mane, APP. for the State. Mr. Prakash Naik Advocate for the original complainant. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 6th April, 2010 PC : 1 This is a second application for grant of bail. The first application was allowed to be withdrawn on 6.7.2009 with liberty to apply for bail after six months if the trial does not start. In pursuance of this liberty, this application is filed. On perusal of the record, I find that the entire incident has taken place during the Ganpati procession. F.I.R. is filed by one Sanjay Jagtap 2 and on perusal of the same, it is seen that four persons are named in the F.I.R. They are Ravikiran Ingawale, Raosaheb Ingawale, Uday Ingawale and Rahul Ingawale. A single blow with knife is given on the chest of the deceased Sanjay Jagtap. However, on perusal of the post mortem notes, it appears that blow has been given in such a force on the vital part that lung has been come out. FIR shows that said blow has been given on the order given by the present applicant. It is seen that two other persons are named in the F.I.R. but they are granted bail. But in the order granting bail, it is clearly mention that the order to kill was given by the present applicant because of this distinction has been made and the benafit of bail has been given to Ravikiran. In my view, this is not a fit case for grant of bail. Hence, application is rejected. ( R.S. MOHITE, J.)