WA 100/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MADAN B. LOKUR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C. UPADHYAY The appellant is aggrieved by an order dated 10.09.2009 passed by a learned Sing le Judge in WP(C) 3273/2006. It appears that a contract was entered into between M/s. Archtech Consultants Pv t. Ltd. (ACPL) and Rajiv Gandhi Memorial Sports Trust (for short RGMST ) for th e construction of a Stadium in Amingaon. The contract appears to have been rescinded for reasons which are not relevant. Be that as it may, the Executive Engineer, Public Works Department in the Govern ment of Assam was asked to make payment of the works carried out. Pursuant there to an assessment was made after site verification and it was concluded that an a mount of ‘130.622 lakhs has been spent on the construction. M/s. Archtech Consultants Pvt. Ltd. filed a writ petition in this Court for rele ase of the entire amount due to it in terms of the interim bill submitted. Howev er, at the time of arguments in the writ petition, the claim of M/s. Archtech Co nsultants Pvt. Ltd. was restricted to ‘130.622 lakhs. The learned Single Judge directed the appellant to make the aforesaid payment to M/s. Archtech Consultants Pvt. Ltd. The grievance of the appellant is that it has no concern with the construction o r contract entered into between M/s.Archtech Consultants Pvt. Ltd. and the Rajiv Gandhi Memorial Sports Trust. It is under these circumstances that the present appeal has been filed. Learned counsel for M/s. Archtech Consultants Pvt. Ltd. has handed over in Court a letter dated 18.1.2010 issued by Sanjib Gohain Boruah, Director, Sports & You th Welfare, Assam to the Secretary to the Government of Assam, Sports & Youth We lfare Department in which it is stated that a request has already been made to t he Guwahati Development Department of the Government of Assam for providing an a mount of ‘130.622 lakhs for making payment to M/s. Archtech Consultants Pvt. Ltd . vide Government letter No.SYW.168/2009/20 dated 5.12.2009. From the above letter, it is quite clear that no liability has been cast on the appellant for making payments and in fact even according to the State of Assam t he payment has to be made to M/s. Archtech Consultants Pvt. Ltd. by the Guwahati Development Department of the Government of Assam. The letter is kept on record . In view of the above, there is no reason for the appellant to be aggrieved by th e order impugned in this appeal. Accordingly, keeping in mind the contents of the letter dated 18.1.2010, this wr it appeal is disposed of.