1 wp3343.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3343 OF 2010 _____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________________ Mr. S.P. Tiwari, advocate for the petitioners. Mr.D.R. Korde, A.G.P. for respondent no.1. Mr. P.N. Kutti, advocate for respondent no.4. 1. Advocate Mr. Tiwari contends that the respondent no.2 had approached the District Consumer Forum but then the question whether there is any amalgamation of respondent nos.3 and 4 is disputed question which could not have been decided by the District Consumer Forum. 2. Advocate Mr. Kuti for respondent no.4 states that affairs of respondent nos. 3 and 4 have merged with the petitioners. Learned A.G.P. for respondent no.1 states that the remedy of filing appeal is available to the petitioners. 3. It is apparent that under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, the petitioners have got remedy of approaching State Commission in the matter. 2 wp3343.10 Hence, with that liberty to the petitioners, the present Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE. 17.03.2011 gas/wp3343.10