IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 31 of 2009 Rajendra Prasad Maikhuri ….Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents. Present : Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. D.C. S. Rawat, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.P. Sah, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, has made a statement at the bar that the writ petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such. On the basis of the statement made by the learned Senior Counsel appearing for petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Interim Orders dated 7.1.2009 and 24.3.2009 stand vacated. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 26.8.2011 Avneet