HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PET!T!ON (C) NO. 2785 OF 2009 PETITIONER Ram Sewa Namdec, Sic late Shri Rampyare Namdeo, aged about 73 years, Occupation Business, Rio Ward No.7, Near Mandir Chowk, Pithoura, District Mahasamund (CG). Versus RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Ccmmissioner, Town and Country Development, Directorate, Raipur,. District Raipur(CG). Coiiector, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (CG). 3. Nagar Panchayat, Pithoui’a: rough its Chief Municipai Omcer, District Mahasamund (CG); 4. Tahsiidar & Executive Magistrate. Pithoura, District Mahasamund (CG). (Writ petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Mr. Sunii Sahu, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Amrito Das. Pane! Lawver for the State. Mr. Prateek Sharma, counsei for the respondent No.3. ORDER ORAL (Passed on this 30‘ day of June, 2009) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the representation of the petitioner dated 4-8-2009 (Annexure -— P/8) is penoing and, as such, the respondent authorities may be directed to maintain status quo with regard to‘the structure in dispute, as it exists today, till disposal of the above-stated representation; ’ 2) At this iuncture, Shri Prateek Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the resoondent No.3 submits that no further steps, to demolish the structure in dispute shall be taken until the representation dated 4-6-2009 (Annexure - PIS) is decided, in accordance with law and on its own meritsr 3) ln view of the above statement made by learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.3, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this matten for. adjudication. 4) Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. / Sdl— : Satish K. Agnihott‘i; Judge ‘ Gowri k th