CWP 378/96 1 In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench, Jaipur. ** Civil Writ Petition No. 378/1996 Miss Jagdamma Vs. Union of India & ors. Date of Order ::: 15/10/09 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. NS Chauhan on behalf of Mr. RD Rastogi, for petitioner. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner with the grievance that despite she has been working since 1984 as Typist-cum- Assistant and later on as Junior Stenographer, her services have not been regularized from the date of her initial appointment. The petitioner was initially appointed as Typist-cum-Assistant vide order Anx. 2 dt. 25/04/1984 against strength of one of the companies which was in liquidation namely; M/s. Jaipur Spinning and Weaving Mills and by later order Anx. 8 dt. 17/11/1986 she was appointed as Junior Stenographer on adhoc basis for 89 days and was allowed to continue in the office of the Official Liquidator but when her candidature was not considered for final absorption. She approached this Court by filing the instant writ petition with the grievance that despite working for sufficient long time and discharging duties satisfactorily, her services have not been regularized and she has been deprived of the CWP 378/96 2 service benefits to which she is entitled under law. Reply has also been filed on behalf of the respondents in which this fact was not controverted that she was continuously working since 1984 against the strength of one of the companies under liquidation and later on appointed on adhoc basis as Junior Stenographer and her services were also found to be satisfactory but it was further averred that the regular selections are made on the post of Junior Stenographer only after selection through Staff Selection Commission. It has been brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioner's candidature was considered by the selection committee and on its recommendations, she was appointed as Junior Stenographer in the regular pay-scale 4000-6000 along with other admissible allowances vide order dated 18/20th July, 2000 (Anx.20) and it further appears from the order that she was appointed in pursuance to the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court dt. 27th August, 1999 and certain DC instructions/reference has been made. The petitioner, after regularly appointed vide order dated 18/20th July, 2000, on completion of the period of probation, is substantively holding the post as Junior Stenographer in the CWP 378/96 3 office of the respondents. Counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner has now been regularized from July, 2000 and she is working continuously from 1984 itself, she is entitled to be regularized from the date of her initial appointment with other admissible benefits from the date of first appointment. In the opinion of this Court, those, who were appointed purely on adhoc basis, there services could not have been regularized as a matter of course. However, in the instant case, it appears that against the available vacant posts in the Office of Official Liquidator her candidature was considered in the light of judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court reported in JT 1999(6)SC 364 and on the recommendations of the selection committee she was appointed as regular basis vide order dated 18/20th July, 2000 and the offer of appointment has been accepted by the petitioner as well. Taking note thereof, since the relief which the petitioner has prayed in the instant petition, has been accepted by the authorities and she is working on regular basis since 2000, CWP 378/96 4 no further orders are required to be passed in the instant petition and the petition has become infructuous. However, benefit of seniority and other benefits, if not granted to her in view of the letter of appointment dt. 18/20th July, 2000, she will at liberty to make representation to the authorities for the same. The writ petition with the above observations stands disposed of. (Ajay Rastogi), J. Raghu/378-CW-1996-final.doc CWP 378/96 5