'^a^^.^ ^ COURT OF CHHATIISGARHATBILASPUR WRIT PETITION <.S) No. 576 of2007. • >NER : Smt Anitha Khalkho W/o Sairez Minj, Aged about 29 years, R/o. Village Harrakoiia, Disfa'ict VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Tfarough: The Secretary, Paiichayat and Social Welfare Deptt. DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur. 2. District Collector, Jashpur District, Chhattisga-h. 3. Janpat Panchayat, Throush Executive OiBcer, Janpad Pancliayat Jashpur Nagar, District Jashpur Nagar, Chhattissarh. 4. Project Ot&cer, Iiitegrated Child Developmeat Scheme, Jashpur .Nagar, District Jashpur Nagar, Clihattisgarh. 5. Smt. Maaoj Thirke, V//'o Shri Prabbucharaii Klialklio R/o Viliage HaiTakona, Post Iciikela, District Jashpur, Chihattisgarh. WMT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hoa'Me Shri K. . S'hri K.R.Nair, Advocate tor the p.etitioaer. Sliri Vinay Harit, Deputy' Advocate General for the State / respondent No. 1,2 and 4. (Passed on 26U> day of March, 2008) The matter is takea up for consideration with tfae coasent ofthe parties. Leamed coiinsel appearine for the petitioner subniits that the appoiatment of the respondent No. 5 on fhe post of Angan Badi worker fbr village Bargaoii, larrakona, District Jashpur, is contrary to the Angaa Badi scheme and law. Be that as it may, the disputed question of facts are involved in ffais matter. Interest ofjiistice would be subserved, iftbe present disputes are referred to the District CoUector for decision after providing opportunity of hearins to the concemed parties. Leamed couasel for the partjes have no objection. Accordingly, the matt.er is referred back to the Collector, Jashpur, for adjudication in accordance with law on its own merit, expsditiously. Li visw ofthe above, ths petitioH stands disposed o£No order asto costs. ThiataT Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge