IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 29TH OCTOBER 2007 / 7TH KARTHIKA 1929 WP(C).No. 31801 of 2007(J) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- ECOFRIENDLY ENERGY AND SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGIES(PVT)LTD., SRI LEKSHMI BUILDINGS, SARADA MADOM LANE, RAVIPURAM, M.G.ROAD, KOCHI. BY ADV. SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA IN LOCAL ADMINISTRATION, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SECRETARY, LOCAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 4. THE KERALA AGRO INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, KISSAN JYOTHI, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. BY ADV. SRI.K.B.MOHANDAS,SC,THRISSUR CORPORATIO SRI.LELLULAL T.G.THUNDATHIL SRI.K.A.SREEJITH SRI.M.R.DHANIL GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. A.J. VARGHESE. SRI. K.B. MOHANDAS - SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/10/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. -------------------------------- W.P.(C)No. 31801 OF 2007 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of October, 2007 JUDGMENT The petitioner is a Company which has taken on contract execution of certain works on behalf of the 4th respondent which according to them have been duly executed. There is a dispute regarding payment of amounts due under the contract between the petitioner and the 4th respondent. The petitioner submits that as per the contract the disputes have to be resolved as per directions of the 1st respondent. The petitioner therefore filed Ext.P6 representation before the 1st respondent. The petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of Ext.P6. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Government pleader. In the nature of the order I propose to pass, I do not think that it necessary to issue notice to respondents 3 and 4. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there would be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass W.P.(c)No.31801/o7 2 appropriate orders on Ext.P6 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and respondents 3 and 4. The writ petition is disposed of as above. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd W.P.(c)No.31801/o7 3