IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43749 of 2008 RAVI KUMAR @ RAVI KUMAR SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 21.11.2008 Heard Sri J.P.Kishore, Advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The case has been registered under Sections 392, 307 etc IPC 25 and 26 of the Arms Act. While the informant was coming back to his house four criminals armed with country made guns surrounded him, when he had de- accelerated his motorcycle so as to crossing the road under water. A pistol was put on his chest and out of fear he left his motorcycle and the criminals road over it and wanted to speed away. Persons had assembled on the road by which the criminals had to escape and they lost control of the motorcycle and as such started running away. One of them, i.e., the petitioner was caught by the persons. The contention is that the Deepak Kumar has been granted bail by the court below and four witnesses have been examined during the course of the trial and they have been not claimed identifying the petitioner at the time of occurrence or in the court. There are some more witnesses during the course of the remaining part of the trial. Considering the nature of the offence and the fact that the petitioner was caught on chase, the course is not inclined to direct the release of the petitioner on bail. Petition is dismissed. The trial court has conclude the trial. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )