1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.427 OF 2007 IN REVIEW PETITION NO.1 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO.45 OF 2004 Satej Prakashan Dhanavate .. Petitioner Vs. The City and Industrial Development Corporation Ltd.& Anr.. Respondents Mr.N.V.Walawalkar, Senior Counsel with Mr.Sanjeev P. Kadam, Mr.Prashant Jadhav and Mr.Prabhakar M. Jadhav for the petitioner Mr.G.S.Hegade for the respondent / CIDCO Mr.N.P.Pandit, A.G.P. for the respondent / State CORAM : J.N.PATEL CORAM : J.N.PATEL CORAM : J.N.PATEL & & & A.S.OKA, JJ A.S.OKA, JJ A.S.OKA, JJ. DATED : 28TH SEPTEMBER, 2007 DATED : 28TH SEPTEMBER, 2007 DATED : 28TH SEPTEMBER, 2007 (IN CHAMBER AT 2.45 P.M.) (IN CHAMBER AT 2.45 P.M.) (IN CHAMBER AT 2.45 P.M.) P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Senior Counsel for the Review Petitioner. The prayer in the Notice of Motion is for modification of the order dated 09.08.2005 passed by this court in the Review Petition filed by the petitioner. 2 2. By the said order dated 09.08.2005, this court clarified that the allotment of the service industrial plot to the petitioner may be decided on the basis of the representation already made by the petitioner and appropriate decision be taken within a period of 3 months in accordance with the existing policy of CIDCO. By the present Notice of Motion, the petitioner is praying that his earlier representation made in the year 1992-93 should be directed to be decided in accordance with the then existing policy of CIDCO. 3. Considering the order passed in the Writ Petition, the prayer cannot be acceded to. 4. The application earlier made by the petitioner was decided and subsequently, the allotment made in favour of the petitioner has been set aside by the order passed in Writ Petition. No case is made out for issuing any clarification. Notice of Motion is accordingly dismissed. ( J.N. PATEL, J ) ( J.N. PATEL, J ) ( J.N. PATEL, J ) 3 ( A.S. OKA, J ) ( A.S. OKA, J ) ( A.S. OKA, J )