IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9674 of 2009 SHANKAR KUMAR,SON OF LATE RANGNATH YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHAMGARH, POLICE STATION-MURLIGANJ, DISTRICT-MADHEPURA. -PETITIONER Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY TELECOMMUNICATION, NEW DELHI. 2. THE SECRETARY, TELECOMMUNICATION, MINISTRY OF TELECOMMUNICATION, GOVT. OF INDIA, DUR SANCHAR BHAWAN, NEW DELHI. 3. TELEPHONE REGULATING AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, MAHANAGAR, DURSANCHAR BHAWAN, NEAR THE ZAKIR HUSSAIN COLLEGE, JAWAHAR LAL MARG, (MINTO ROAD), NEW DELHI. 4. THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LAW, GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 5. THE LAW COMMISSION, MINISTRY OF LAW, THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, NEW DELHI. 6. THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 7. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY OF LAW DEPARTMENT, OLD SECRETARIAT GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 8. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MADHEPURA. 9. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, MADHEPURA. 10. THE CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR/C.E.O. OF DISNET WIRELESS LIMITED (AIRCEL) MOBILE, 5TH FLOOR, SPENCER PALAZA, 769 ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI, TAMILNADU. 11. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, BIHAR DISNET WIRELESS LIMITED (AIRCEL) TELECOM MOBILE PROVIDER, 415, 4TH FLOOR, MAHARAJA COMPLEX,FRASER ROAD, PATNA, BIHAR. 12. THE CHAIRMAN, ESSAR COMPANY, MANAGING DIRECTOR / C.E.O. OF VODAPHONE, INDIA, NEW DELHI. 13. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, BIHAR VODA FONE ESSAR MOBILE PROVIDER, BIHAR CLRCLE, 4TH FLOOR, MAHARAJA COMPLEX, FRAZER ROAD, PATNA, BIHAR. 14. ATMANAND KUMAR SON OF LATE KRISHANA KANT MANDAL. 15. OMANAND KUMAR SON OF LATE KRISHNA KANT MANDAL, BOTH RESIDENT OF CHAMGARH, POLICE STATION-MURLIGANJ,DISTRICT-MADHEPURA. 2 2 13.08.2009 Heard Mr. Choudhary Shyam Nandan, for the petitioner, learned counsel for Union of India and learned Advocate General, on behalf of the State. The petitioner, in this writ petition, has prayed for issuing a writ of mandamus to respondents no.2 and 3 for laying down appropriate guidelines relating to various aspects pertaining to installation of mobile towers. The petitioner should make appropriate representation before respondents no. 2 and 3. With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. (P.K. Misra, CJ.) (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) AAhmad