IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18666 of 2010 TRILOKI NATH KUMAR, SON OF LATE BALESHWAR KUMAR, RESDIENT OF VILLAGE DUMRI, POLICE STATION SIMRI, DIST. ARA AT PRESENT POSTED AS ASSISTANT ENGINEER(CIVIL) CIVIL DIVISION, PUNAICHAK, PATNA IN THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD. Versus 1. THE CHAIRMAN, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VIDYUT BHAWAN, PATNA. 2. THE SECRETARY, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VIDYUT BHAWAN, PATNA. 3. THE JOINT SECRETARY, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VIDYUT BHAWAN, PATNA. 4. THE GENERAL MANAGER-CUM-CHIEF ENGINEER, MUZAFFARPUR THARMAL POWER STATION, KANTI IN THE DIST. MUZAFFARPUR. For the petitioner : Mr. Mirtunjay Pd, Singh, Advocate. For the Board : M/s. Nilu Agrawal, Manoj Kumar, Advocates. ----------- 05. 24.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the Bihar State Electricity Board(hereinafter referred to as the Board). 2. Petitioner is serving the Board on the post of Assistant Engineer. He is aggrieved by the notification of the Board bearing Memo No.127 dated 26.3.2009, Annexure-7, whereunder his request for grant of leave with pay for 280 days while he was engaged in connection with treatment of his son at AIIMS, New Delhi has been rejected after granting him leave which is admissible to him. The remaining period has been treated as leave with half or without pay. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that notification of the Board dated 26.3.2009, Annexure-7 is contrary to the precedents and practice followed by the Board, as would appear from the contents of letter no.1520 dated 4.8.1982 and office order no. 412 dated 5.8.1988. - 2 - 4. Let petitioner seek review of the notification of the Board dated 26.3.2009, Annexure-7 with reference to letter dated 4.8.1982 and office order dated 5.8.1988 of the Joint Secretary of the Board by filing a representation before the Chairman of the Board. Appropriate order on the request of the petitioner for review of notification dated 26.3.2009 be passed, as early as possible, in any case within two months from the date of receipt of the request of the petitioner along with a copy of this order. 5. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)