IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38305 of 2009 LUTANI DEVI . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . 2 21.12.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the State. Offence alleged is under Sections 302 and 328/34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the allegation in the First Information Report the daughter of the informant Sangeeta Devi was married to one Sanjay Paswan who developed his love affairs with petitioner Lutani Devi. The daughter of the informant was killed by all named accused persons as she protested her husband’s relationship with the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations are false. Post mortem report indicates that Sangita Devi died her natural death because of lung disease. Considering these facts, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of above named petitioner is allowed. In the event of her arrest/surrender within four weeks from today in the court below, the petitioner aforesaid shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Beldour P.S. - 2 - case no. 10 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.Kumar -----------