C.R. No. 1869 of 2011 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 1869 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 17, 2011 Hans Raj …..Petitioner Vs. Nath Ram and others …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Ms. Sonia G. Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) The application for appointment of Local Commissioner, being vague, has been dismissed by the trial Court. A perusal of the order indicates that the application for appointment of the Local Commissioner has been dismissed solely on the ground that it is vague as the plaintiff has not mentioned as to what the Local Commissioner is supposed to do. C.R. No. 1869 of 2011 (O&M) [2] Counsel for the petitioner has made an attempt to satisfy this Court that appointment of Local Commissioner is necessary for the just decision of the case. Without expression of any opinion on merits, I deem it appropriate to dismiss this revision petition. However, it is observed that since the application for appointment of Local Commissioner has not been decided on merits, it will be open to the petitioner to file an application for appointment of Local Commissioner by specifying the reason and purpose of the application as the first application has been dismissed for improper drafting of the application. No ground is made out for interfering in the order dismissing the application. Dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh application for appointment of Local Commissioner. It is expected that in case any such application is filed, it will be considered taking into consideration the specific particulars. However, it will be the discretion of the trial Court either to allow the application or to dismiss the same depending upon the circumstances. March 17, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE