IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7649 of 2010 SANTOSH TIWARI @ BULET TIWARY, son of Sri Maheshwar Nath Tiwari, resident of village- Pakariya Rekhsunderpatti, P. S. Jagdishpur (Nautan), Dist- West Champaran, Bettiah, Bihar… Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 04.03.2010 Herd counsel for the petitioner. No one appears for the State. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner for an offence under Section 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code has been primarily pressed on the ground that barring the confession of co-accused, there is nothing to connect the petitioner in this case. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that almost on identical ground, this court has granted anticipatory bail to co- accused Nawal Pathak whose such prayer was earlier rejected by the same impugned order. Considering the aforementioned facts, this court would direct the if petitioner namely, Santosh Tiwari @ Bulet Tiwary would surrender within a period of four weeks from today, he would be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM, West Champaran, Bettiah in connection with 2 Majhaulia P. S. Case No. 280 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. It is, however, made clear that if in course of investigation/trial the presence of the petitioner is required, he would co-operate in the same, and failure on his part to do so will entail the consequences of cancellation of his bail under the present order. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)