IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.Rev. No. 139 of 2010 Decided on: 29.6.2011 State of H.P. and others …Petitioners Versus Jagdish Chand …Respondent Coram: The Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioners : Mr. R. K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For the respondent : None. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : C.M.P. No. 1339 of 2010 Heard. In view of the grounds taken in the application, duly supported by an affidavit, the delay in filing the present review petition is condoned. The application stands disposed of. C. Rev. No. 139 of 2010 There is no error apparent on the face of record. Thus, the case does not fall within the ambit of Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?No -2- of Civil Procedure. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. No costs. (R.B. Misra), Judge. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. June 29, 2011 (K. Attri)