IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revison No.6092 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision:28.01.2010. Ramesh Kumar Chopra and another ...Petitioners Versus Ved Prakash …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Alok Jagga, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. Learned counsel for the petitioners very fairly states that the other petition filed by the petitioners challenging the ejectment order has since been dismissed by this Court in the month of December 2009. In the light thereof, the averment proceeds, this petition under Section 12 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 has been rendered infructuous. Disposed of as infructuous, accordingly. January 28, 2010 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE