IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE FRIDAY, THE 16TH DECEMBER 2011 / 25TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 33924 of 2004(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------- V.K.SIVANKUTY, VADAKKETHIL THAIPURAYIDATHIL, THAZHEVETTIPURAM, MAILAPRA P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADV. SRI.P.RAMAKRISHNAN SRI.T.C.KRISHNA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KERALA HEADLOAD WORKERS WELFARE BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ERNAKULAM. 2. KERALA HEADLOAD WORKERS WELFARE BOARD, PATHANAMTHITTA LOCAL COMMITTEE REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 3. V.THOMAS, VADAKKETHIL HOUSE, MAILAPARA P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA. R1 & R2 BY ADV.SRI.A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PANICKER,SC,KHLWWB SRI.V.V.NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR SRI.T.P.PRADEEP SRI.R.SATHISH KUMAR,SC,KHLWWB SRI.RENIL ANTO KANDAMKULATHY,SC,KHLWWB SRI.KOSHY GEORGE,SC,KHLWWB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: BKA WP(C).No. 33924 of 2004(L) APPENDIX PETITIONER'(S) EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.05.2004 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT ALONG WITH STATEMENT SHOWING VACANCY OF POSTS. EXT.P2 COPY OF APPOINTMENT ORDER ISSUED BY the 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 01.07.2004. EXT.P3 COPY OF JUDGMENT OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN WP(C) NO:24146/2004 DATED 13.08.2004. EXT.P4 COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY the 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 13.09.2004. EXT.P5 COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 18.09.04. RESPONDENT'(S) EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE BKA A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J. ------------------------------------------ WP(C) NO. 33924 OF 2004 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 16th day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T This writ petition is filed challenging Ext.P5 order issued by Kerala Headload Workers Welfare Board, canceling the appointment of petitioner as a head load worker on the ground that the petitioner did not have registration card under Rule 26A for two years. On account of the fact that the said period is already over, no further orders are necessary in the matter and it is open for the petitioner to approach the Board, if he is otherwise eligible. This writ petition is therefore dismissed. A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE bka/-