IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN MONDAY, THE 8TH JUNE 2009 / 18TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 13417 of 2009(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.MUSTHAFA, S/O.HAMZA, PALAKKAL HOUSE, PERINTALMANNA. BY ADV. SRI.S.RAMESH BABU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERINTALMANNA. 3. ABDUL NAZAR.V. @ KUTTIPPA, S/O.MOHAMMED, VADAKETHIL HOUSE, POOPPANAM, ANGADIPPURAM PANCHAYAT, VALAMPUR.P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. KRISHNANKUTTY, S/O.KUTTAN, VATTAKASSERI HOUSE, POOPPANAM, ANGADIPPURAM PANCHAYAT, VALAMPUR.P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 5. U.SAIDALAVI, ULLATTIL HOUSE, POOPPANAM, ANGADIPPURAM PANCHAYAT, VALAMPUR.P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 6. MUHAMMED HANEEFA, KUNNANAD HOUSE, POOPPANAM, ANGADIPPURAM PANCHAYAT, VALAMPUR.P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE FOR R3 TO 6 SRI.V.P.PRASAD FOR ADDL.R BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.A.SALIM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) No.13417 of 2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE LEASE AGREEMENT DATED 3.4.2009 EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 6.5.2009 FROM THE ANGADIPURAM PANCHAYAT. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT. 4.5.2009 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE SECOND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: EXT.R3(a) TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DT. 29.4.2009. //TRUE COPY// P.A. To judge. P.R.RAMAN & P.BHAVADASAN, JJ. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.13417 of 2009 ------------------------------- Dated this the 8th June, 2009 J U D G M E N T Raman, J. Interim order passed by this Court as early as on 15.5.2009 works to the satisfaction of all concerned. By the interim order, it has been made clear that all the 32 local persons cannot be given employment. However, if the services of any person is required by the licensees, they would request the services of the persons included in Ext.R3 (a) list. Therefore, it ensures that only workers in Ext.R3(a) list will be employed by the petitioner and it cannot give room to any complaint to anyone else. If anybody has got better case, it is for them to file a complaint before the appropriate authorities. Clarifying the above position and making the interim order absolute, the writ petition is closed. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE P.BHAVADASAN , JUDGE. nj.