WRIT PETITIONWS} N0.§\$3 OF 2010 l i’"ShiV Kumar Rajwade, S/o > Gahbar Rajwade, aged about 24 years, presently posted as Constable, Surajpurx Police District 'Surajpur, District Sarguja,(CG). Attached in Base Camp, . Mandagaon, Police Station Badgaon, District Kanker (CG). PETITIONER : 'ersus- V 1'.,, State o‘f Chhattisgarh, Through the 'Secretary, ' D'epaxtment of Home, DKS ' ‘ Bhawan, Mantralaya’, Raipur (CG); RESPONDENTS : ' 2 (Director General, of Police, Police _ Headquarters, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG). 'v 3f inspector General of Police, v Sarguja Range, Sarguja (CG). 6 Superintendent “of Police, Surajpur,' District Sarguja (CG). 5. , Superintendent of Police, . North Bastar, Ka‘nker (CG). WRIT PETITIONUN‘DER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA- v- , 4f v mmwméwa5l59/zo 111200 311w m (W) mmw WWW WW§1§€IW awfFanm WWW?“ 5.3: HON’ELE $USTECE MR. PR! INKER WWQKER ‘ a3-z39-2m Q: Shri shri Vivek Vivek Shaurma, Raniaq TiwarL Pane! co Lwer msei far for th; n Statelreespondents. petf on r Grievance of the petitioner is that he has been attached for temporary period of four months from Suraj ur to Base Camp} Mahdagaon; Poiice Stae Badgaon, District Kanker but even fter expiry of the said period he has not been relieved r CoUnsel for the petitioner s bmits that the representations of the petitioner (Annexure P-6 & P-7) is pending b fore the authorities but tiii date the same has not been decided and the ends of tice wouid serve if the petitioner is permitted to fiie fresh representation beforet e respondent No. 2 raising aii his grievances which have been raised in the pres nt petition and in turn the said respondent Nor 2 may be directed to decide the sa e expeditiousiy in accordance with iaw. ats submits that ‘iet the petitioner make a representation before the respond nt No. 2 and the same wouid be dectded i accordance with iavvi th the aforesaid direction. in the eventuatity of filing any such representation by th petittoner before the respondent No.2 Within three weeks from the date of the r ceipt of the copy of this order: it is expected from the respondent No. 2 to decid the same considering ail the factuai and Iegai aspect of the case as expeditiously s possible preferably within two months. it is made clear that this Co rt has not expressed any opinion on merits of ‘the case and the authority con erned would be at liberty to decide the representation of the petitioner stric iy in accordance with iaw. - Learned counsei for the _49// Sdl Pritinker Diwaker Judge o j' s t n i The petition is disposed of