CWP (T) No. 2440 of 2008 25.2.2009 Present: Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Addl. A.G. and Mr. Vikas Rathore, Dy.A.G. for respondents No. 1 to 3. Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate for respondent No.5. The learned Senior Additional Advocate General fairly submits that the representation made by the petitioner on 6.7.1994 ought to have been decided by a speaking order. A bare perusal of the order dated 7.11.1994 reveals that the same is not a speaking/reasoned order. The learned Senior Additional Advocate General further submits that the representation will be decided afresh by the respondents by a speaking order and after taking into consideration the subsequent developments as well within a period of eight weeks from today. In view of the observations made hereinabove, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), J. February 25, 2009. (cr)