IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Application No.31/2005 Ved Prakash and others .. Petitioners. Versus State of Uttaranchal & another .. Respondents. Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J.(Oral) Dated: 15-04-2010 List has been revised. None has appeared on behalf of the petitioners. I have heard learned A.G.A. for the respondent/State. I have gone through the record available before me. In proceedings U/S 482 Cr.P.C. I am not supposed to embark upon an enquiry with regard to the accusation of the petitioners at this stage, as any judgment rendered by me would amount to pre- trial. This court is also not supposed to assess the evidence, specially under the circumstances when the evidence is still incomplete and hazy. I do not find any abuse of process of court in this case and no flagrant injustice is caused to the applicants. The petition lacks merit and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. The interim stay order, if any, stands vacated. ISB (B.C. Kandpal, J.)