IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 23489 of 2008 Between: Itta Penchalaiah, S/o. Late Rudramurthy, R/o. D.No. 11-58, Near ESI Hospital, Tadepalli Village, Tadepalli Mandal, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 Superintendent of Police, Guntur, Guntur District. 3 Station House Officer, Tadepalli Police Station, Tadepalli Village and Mandal, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents in not considering the representation dt. 24-12-2007 for removal of entry of the name of the petitioner from the suspect sheet in the 3rd respondent Tadepalli Police Station, Tadepalli, Guntur District is illegal arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to consider the representation, dt. 24- 12-2007 of the petitioner for removal of name of the petitioner from the suspect sheet not beyond 3 weeks. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.RAVI KUMAR TOLETY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 23489 of 2008 O R D E R: This writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “To issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents in not considering the representation dt. 24-12-2007 for removal of entry of the name of the petitioner from the suspect sheet in the 3rd respondent Tadepalli Police Station, Tadepalli, Guntur District is illegal arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to consider the representation, dt. 24-12-2007 of the petitioner for removal of name of the petitioner from the suspect sheet not beyond 3 weeks.” Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents, without expressing any opinion on merits, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 24-12-2007 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI,J Date: 30-10-2008 KLP