3 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (C)No. 1631 of 2007 Petjtioner Faguram Markam Son of Roop Singh IVlarkam, aged about 39 years, R/o Village Darigawan, District Kabirdham, [Vice President Janpad Panchayat Sahaspur Lohara], District Kabirdham [C.G.]. Versus Respondents SB: :1. The Director, Panchayat and Social Welfare Department, Chhattisgarh Raipur [C.G.]. 2. The Prescribed Officer [Collector], Kabirbham [C.G.] 3. The Stateof Chhattisgarh, through Department ofSocialWelfare, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur[C.G] 4. The Chief Executive OfRcer, Janpad Panchayat Sahaspur Lohara, District Kabirdham [C.G.]. 5. The Chairman/President, Janpad Panchayat Sahaspur Lohara, Disfrict Kabirdham [C.G.]. Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihotri. J. Present: Mr. P.K. Tulsyan, counsel forthe petitioner. Mr. Utkarsh Veram, Govt. Advocate for the respondents/State. ORDER (Passed on this 20th day of Mareh, 2007) 1. The petitioner is the elected Vide President of the Janpad Panchayat, Sahaspur Lohara, District Kabirdham. Vide letter dated 26.6.2006, the petitioner has made an appiication to the Chief Executive Cfficer, Janpad Panchayat, Sahaspur Lohara praying his resignation from the post of the Vice President of the Janpad Panchayat, Sahaspur Lohara. The same was received on 27.6.2006. 2. Jhe Collector, Kabirbham exercising his power under Section 37 (1) (B) of the Panchayat Raj Adhjniyam, 1993 accepted the resignation of the petitioner vide order dated 14th July, 2006 (P/2). 3. Thereafter, ihe petitioner has fiied one more ietter dated 17.7.200G (P/3), addressed to the Deputy Director, Panchayat and Social Welfare, District Kabirdham, withdrawing his resignation letterdated 26.6.2006. r r 8. The petitioner hasinitialfy madean application tendering his resignation to the Collector and the same was accepted vide order dated 14th July, 2006, The letter of withdrawal of resignation was not addressed either to the Chief Executive OfRcer or to the Co!lector, but addressed to the Deputy Director Panchayat and Social Welfare. The petitioner has filed an appeal against the order dated 14 July, 2006, passed by the Collector, Kabirdham before the Director, Panchayat under Section 91 (3)0fthe Chhattisgarh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993. During pendency of the appeal, the petitioner has moved an application for grant of stay before the Director Panchayat, which has been rejected vide order dated 27.2.2007 (P/5). The petitioner has filed this petition underArticle 227 ofthe Constitution of India chailenging the validity ofthe order dated 27.2.2007 (P/5), passed by the D.irector (Panehayat). On hearing learned counsei appearing for the petitioner and perusing pieadings and documents appended thereto, it is found that thers is no impropriety, illegality, irregularity or jurisdictiona! ftrror asto invoks supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. It is well settled that this Court should refrain itself from entertaining a petition in exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction, except in cases where the perversity, illegaiity or irregularity is writ large on the face oftherecord. None ofthe above is the case here in this petition. Thus, this petition is dismissed summarily. ___—— —-— Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge B/- r