\ HIGH COURT (3F CHHATTfSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 5582 of2007 o\\9‘D \\ PETITIONER : 1. Ahmad Khan S/o Shn‘ Gulab khan. agigd about 58 yeai‘s, R/ Baidev Bagh, Choubey Bada, Rajnandgaoa ' [c 2. Lal Smgh Marco S/o Late Shn Kushal Smgh Marco, aged about 51 yeam, R/o Now C1v11 Lines, Qtr No 31 ‘ Rajnandgaon [C G ] VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through — Secretaty, Department of Panchayat and Social Welfare, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur [C.G.} Director, Panchayat and Social Welfare, D.K_.S. Bhavan, Raipur [C.G.] 3. Secretary, Department of School Education, Government of Chhatusgarhg D K S Bhavan, Rmpur ‘ [C G] 4. Director Pubhc Instrucuons Pensmn Em Rmpur LC G} WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA l ' SB. Hon’ble Shri satish K. Agnihotrl J. H 19 ’ Present: Shn‘ J.K.Shastri, Advocate for the petitioners I Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for’the Stare/responaems. i; ORAL ORDER (Passed on 10m day of January, 2008) 1. Learned counsel appearmg for the pet1t10ners submits that the petmoners t does not want to press thls pentlon on ment at tlns stage, 1n View ofthe faot I that then representanons dated 15 11 2006 (Annexure PfS and P/6) are pendmg cons1derat1on before the respondent No 1 Learned counsel further : j prays that the authormes concerned may be dnected to‘consrder and decide V » r their representations and pass appropriate orders, expeditiously. 2. The respondent No. 1 is accordingly directed to consider and decide the representation dated 15. 11.2006 (Annexure P/S and P/6) of the petitioners in r accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks h‘om the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order. 3. In View ofthe foregoing, this petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge