IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 15TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 3730 of 2009(R) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.M.CHAKKAPPAN, PUTHUSSERY HOUSE SOUTH ADUVASSERY, KUNNUKKARA VILLAGE KUNNUKKARA PO., NORTH PARUR. BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY ERNAKULAM. 2. PRAMOD KUMAR.N., HOUSE NO.6/275, SREEVILAS, WEST VELIYATHUNAD PO., ALANGAD, NORTH PARUR. BY GOVT. PEADER SMT. SUDAH DEVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ----------------------- W.P.(C).No.3730 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 4th day of February, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner had applied for a temporary permit in the route North Parur-Manjaly-Ankamaly-Manapra via Maikad. The 2nd respondent was a rival contestant. By Ext.P2, permit was ordered to be granted to the 2nd respondent and the petitioner was found be disqualified for default in payment of tax. Though the petitioner challenged Ext.P2 permit issued to the 2nd respondent in an appeal ,that was not successful. Counsel now points out referring to Ext.P3 that the tax liability which was the disqualification pointed out has since been cleared. In this writ Petition what he seeks is that, he hs now filed Ext.P5, an application for temporary permit for the ensuing periods and that also should be considered as and when request in this behalf made by the WP(c).No.3730/09 /2/ 2nd respondent or anybody else is taken up for consideration. Taking into account the aforesaid calculation, the writ Petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider Ext.P5 along with any other application that may be received for the route in question. Needless to say that if the facts are as stated above, such consideration shall be untrammeled by Ext.P4. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/