IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45012 of 2010 1.ANIL SAW @ ANIL SAH,S/O MADAN SAW @ MADAN SAH. 2.KUSHESHWARI DEVI, D/O MADAN SAW @ MADAN SAH. BOTH RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE-ATAPUR, TOLA NAWTOLIYA, P.S.-HASANPUR, DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR (BIHAR). ………………PETITIONERS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR. ………………OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- 02/ 26.03.2011 Heard counsel for the petitioners and counsel for the State. Considering the fact that the allegation against petitioner no. 2, Kusheshwari Devi, married nanad of the deceased lady is not at all substantiated at least in the First Information Report, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to her. That being so, if the petitioner no. 2, Kusheshwari Devi surrenders within a period of four weeks from today, this Court would direct for her release on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Rosera, Samastipur in connection with Hasanpur P.S Case No. 16 of 2010 subject to the conditions laid down under Section- 438 (2) Cr. P.C and also subject to the following three conditions:- (i) The two bail bonds will be furnished, one by the Government servant and the other by a close family relative. (ii) The petitioner will remain present in course of trial on each and every day and his absence even for a single day would automatically entail the consequences of cancellation of his bail. (iii) The petitioner in case is now made accused in any other criminal case, that would itself lead to cancellation of his bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner no.1, Anil Saw @ Anil Sah is however rejected. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha,J)