IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 339 of 2002 (M/B) Shivcharan Singh Rawat, S/o Sri Dindayal Singh Rawat, Secretary, Bar Association, Dehradun. …….. Petitioner Versus 1. Bar Council of India, through Secretary, 21, Rouse Avenue, Institutional Area, Near Bal Bhawan, New Delhi – 110002. 2. Advocate General, Uttaranchal. …….. Respondents Mr. C.K. Sharma, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Paresh Tripathi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for the respondent No.2. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon. Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Mr. C.K. Sharma, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Paresh Tripathi, Advocate for the petitioner. None for respondent No. 1. Mr. N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for respondent No. 2. 2. Mr. N.C. Gupta, the learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2 submits that as Bar Council for the State of Uttaranchal has already been constituted, the writ petition, seeking constitution of Bar Council of Uttaranchal, has now become infructuous. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant,) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 26.04.2006 26.04.2006 G