1 ca10191.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD C.A.NO.10191 OF 2011 IN W.P. NO.3023 OF 2011 [ Uttam Sarjerao Ranjwan vs. Balasaheb Muktaji Dhumal & Anr.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. B.S. Kudale, Advocate for applicant. Mr. Dhiraj R. Jethliya, Advocate h/f Mr. S.P. Shah, Advocate for R-1 & 2. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 17TH DECEMBER, 2011 PER COURT : . Heard the Counsel for the applicant and the Counsel for the respondents. 2. Learned Counsel for the respondents vehemently opposed the application and submitted that, the application is filed for restoration after four months from the dismissal of the writ petition for non 2 ca10191.11 prosecution. 3. I have perused the contents of the application. It is stated in para-3 that, the Advocate inadvertently due to oversight could not notice the matter which was listed for admission on the board on 29-04-2011. Due to the mistake of the Advocate, litigant should not suffer. Therefore, taking lenient view in the matter, Civil Application is allowed. Writ Petition NO. 3023 OF 2011 is restored to its original position. Civil Application stands disposed of. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/DEC11