IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 5TH APRIL 2010 / 15TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 11476 of 2010(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- V.A.ABDUL LATHEEF, S/O.AHAMMED, AGED 57 YEARS, VARIKKADAN HOUSE, PALLIKKAVALA, MUDICKAL P.O., PERUMBAVOOR. BY ADV. SRI.A.AHZAR RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, ERNAKULAM. 2. TAHASILDAR, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, PERUMBAVOOR. 3. THE MUNICIPAL SECRETARY, PERUMBAVOOR MUNICIPALITY, PERUMBAVOOR. 4. LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER, PUBLIC OFFICE BUILDING, TRIVANDRUM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER: SRI P NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.11476 of 2010 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of April, 2010 JUDGMENT The matter concerns a dispute regarding the access available to the property of the petitioner through puramboke land in Re survey No.5 in Block No.65 of Perumbavoor Village. The total extent of the puramboke land is 60 cents. The said property is situated to the north of the Fish Market Road and has a length of 85 meters in the east-west direction. Various proceedings which have been initiated are mentioned by the petitioner in the writ petition. Now the matter is pending before the fourth respondent which is evident from Exts.P10 and P11 communications which are interim orders passed in the matter. The appeal is one filed by the persons who are shown as respondents 2 to 8 in Ext.P7 order passed by the District Collector. The petitioner's name is shown as the petitioner therein also. It is prayed that the appeal may be directed to be disposed of within a specified period. 2. Therefore, there will be a direction to the fourth respondent to take a decision on the appeal filed from Ext.P7 within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment after hearing all parties including the WPC.No.11476/2010 : 2 : third respondent, Municipality. The petitioner will produce a copy of the writ petition along with a copy of the judgment for compliance. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. (T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) skj