^m ^^ [;U-saB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR [C.G.1 S'C3&C5 Writ Petition No.-^——^'-/04 PETITIONER ,^°iL..-<,A ..-sS^ .-^^^^..•-f^-^ ^^ Tejsawi Kumar Patel S/o Late Bhuwaneshwar Prasad Patel, Caste- Aghariya Aged- About 23 Years, R/o- Village- Bilaspur, Tahsil- Kharasiya , Distt -Raigarh [C.G.]. VERSUS ff ^1-' '7. ^ Itt RESPONDENTS v/ 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary School Education Department, D K S .""^ ^, . ON\ >^-' " ' Bhawan, RaipurfC.G.) 2. Director, (Lok Shikshan) Lok Sikshan Sanchanaalay, Raipur. S.Collector, Raigarh. .-4.District Education Officer, Raigarh. 5. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Evam Paden Par Sanchalak ( Lok Shikshan) Raigarh. ,-y WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA =F? rlsii^w^TRai'*" |:?W3;n^STgii*iiqt ''K' ,. . .^^^^^^i|:%^j' i:^|Es|»i'i*i^ «<l*lCTlsfl»*il<!hl"'"~""""'"""""~':y'/?"';'I!''p 3fl^?f'lraB^('{q[y<^) 24.1.20(ffi: Shri Sanjay Patel counsel fo|' 1-Ieard. i ,- This petition- has beeri appointment on theiground thatj BFiuvneshwar Prasad Patel ciied: Department ofGovernment ofChhs|ttisgarh f|led by the petitioner for compassionate 1 father of the petitioner riamely:, 'late Shri ^hile he v/as serying the School Education as Assistant Teaoher. Learned counsel for the p^titioner Raigarh vide order of|;ahnexure P-' Panchayat) to, give appointment tt^. Class III as ttne .narrie of the petit annexure. P-4. il-lowever, the. pet( appointment in spite 6f the,represe|itation vide annexure P-6. ' Learned oounsel for the be served if thel petitioner is given the respondents for con-ipassionat^ stipulated period. Afterhearing thecounselfo annexure P-4, \i am of the opinion j' petitioner is given liberty; to make; within a period' of 16 days and | ^PT'lt^R ^!i4<'ii ^f felel <Pnt$i< ^'affiiHsn^T .; the petitioner. submits that the CQtlector of District had directed the appointing authotity (Gram the petitioner as Contract Schoql Teacher :ioner finds place at S.No. ^33 in the list of tioner has not been given compassionate made by him to the ©olleotorRaigarh petftipnersubmits that the ends of justioe would liberty of makihg a detailed Tepresentation to appointmenyo be decided by them wjtt'iinja oijder•[Of if the. •the petitioner and going through the (haf.it would be in the interest of|justige ^detailed TepreseDtation to the^respQr'icients |3n such representation being 'rhadei By the .—a! *: XI-H&-7S iiaill^l^RR^Ii 11 Iflsisii^i'gNw «-; o !(v^f <-. > 'W:S^"ai(%K-l»l,?'SSllW%; HITCTrgWI^SMSs.^S^S.^l:aoo SII^^WC' decicjed petitioner tfis-same shall be reasoned order, wjthin aperioclthr! OrdeFeQaccofdingly. Witl-itMei obseroations mad< In view.ofWis order IA N0. bythe respondents by a detailed and well •^e months there from. aboye, the petitjon is disposed of. P958/2004 stands disposed of. S^N^ 91^iCT? ^f ^^ ^f^^tt' .^'taSnaiSw :?, ^ Sd/- ;:-t- DhirendraMishra Judge