IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH OCTOBER 2009 / 15TH ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 27953 of 2009(O) -------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN IA 9447/2008 IN OS.84/1991 of PRL.M.C.,ERNAKULAM .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.J.ANTONY, SON OF LATE JOSEPH, AGED 54,KURISUPARAMBIL HOUSE, PANANGAD DESOM, KUMBALAM VILLAGE,KANAYANNUR TALUK NOW RESIDING AT KURISUPARAMBIL HOUSE,KANNANGATTU TEMPLE ROAD, EDA KOCHI, KOCHI TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.A.BALAGOPALAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SUSY JOSEPH, DAUGHTER OF LATE JOSEPH AND WIFE OF JOHN, AGED 36, KURUPPASSERY HOUSE, CANAL WARD, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 2. SHEELA, DAUGHTER OF LATE JOSEPH, AGED 52, KUTTIKKAT HOUSE, MADAVANA DESOM, KUMBALAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C).NO.27953 OF 2009 (O) ----------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of October, 2009 J U D G M E N T The writ petition is filed by the decree holder/plaintiff in O.S.No.84 of 1991 challenging the order passed by the learned Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam, declining his request to purchase stamp papers directly for engrossing the final decree passed in the above suit for partition. The learned Munsiff passed Ext.P2 order directing the petitioner to deposit the necessary amount before the court. Challenge is against that order. I find the order passed by the learned Munsiff is strictly in tune with Rule 236 of the Civil Rules of Practice. There is no impropriety or illegality in the order. Writ petition lacks merit, and it is dismissed. S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN JUDGE prp