1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRI. REVISION APPLICATION NO. 62 OF 2009 Shahnawaz Khan s/o Ismail Khan Vs. Smt. Parveen Bano w/o Shahnawaz Khan ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders Mr. Manish Gupta, Advocate for applicant. Mr. M.A. Qureshi, Advocate for non-applicant. CORAM:- R. Y. GANOO, J. DATED :- 10th SEPTEMBER, 2009. 1. Heard learned Advocates on both sides. Learned Judge of the Family Judge, Court No.4, Nagpur has ordered interim maintenance of Rs.1,500/- by order dated 4th December, 2008 on an application for maintenance filed under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The learned Judge of the Family Court No.4, Nagpur has considered all the facts and fixed the amount of interim maintenance. So far as stand of the present applicant is concerned as regards his responsibility to look after his father, in the reply no details are set out as to sources of income of his father, how much amount he has spent to his father. Even applicant mentions in reply that he is working as a private commission agent, he does not mention in what 2 firm he is dealing with a private commission agent. The averments made in the reply are absolutely vague. No doubt he alleges that the respondent is working as a Teacher and earns by doing some job of Fall and Pico Center at her house. There is no material produced even prima facie so far as this aspect is concerned. 2. Looking to the order as a whole, I am inclined to observe that the learned Judge of the Family Court No.4, Nagpur has accepted the monthly earning of the applicant as Rs.3,000/- and granted a sum of Rs.1,500/- per month as maintenance. In my view, it appears to be a reasonable one for the interim maintenance as the Court is not required to go into details with reference to the quantum of maintenance at the stage of disposal of the application of interim maintenance. Needless to mention that the applicant will get full opportunity to lead his evidence at the time of trial. Hence no interference is required in the impugned order and petition is required to be dismissed. Hence, the order. Petition is dismissed. JUDGE pma.