IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12658 of 2003 RAM SUCHIT RAM son of late Rampati Paswan, R/o village Bharwar, P.O. Belshra P.S. Aurangabad Mufasil District Aurangabad ....Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR Through Collector, Aurangabad. 2. The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Aurangabad. 3. The Circle officer, Aurangabad .......Respondents. ----------- 9 19.01.2011 Heard the parties. The present petition has been filed questioning the validity and legality of the order dated 3.1.2003 (Annexure-3) passed in Case No. 469 of 2001 by respondent Subdivisional Magistrate, Aurangabad , whereby a proceeding under section 133 Cr.P.C. has been dropped holding therein that it was not a case of public nuisance rather it was a case of encroachment made over public road appertaining to plot no. 722 and for removal of such encroachment, Anchaladhikari, Aurangabad has been directed to take appropriate action under the provisions of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act 1956. The petitioner, being aggrieved by the said order, filed Cr. Revision No. 31 of 2003 before the learned Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, which was dismissed by an order dated 6.3.2003, (Annexure-4). Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to point out any illegality, irregularity or infirmity in the order passed by the authorities concerned. Only submission made on behalf of the petitioner is that he may be granted permission to approach respondent Anchaladhikari for redressal of his certain valid grievances. After having heard the parties and after considering the 2 materials available on record, this court does not find any illegality or irregularity in the orders impugned. Accordingly, the writ petition fails and is dismissed. If petitioner so chooses may approach the Anchaladhikari, Aurangabad for redressal of his grievances, if such proceeding is pending before him. M.Rahman ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J )