I- 3 ^ iyo(^ IN THE HIGH COURT Oi^CIIHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO.'?,0°>40F2003. PETITIONER .^^sy- ^^^ A<' <">- ^/' H.S. Swarnakar, S/o Shri MannulalSwarnakar Aged about 48 years, Sub Engineer, Irrigation Department, at Champa Branch Canal, Sub DivisionN».1, Seoni, Champa, (CHHATTISGARH) and permahent R/o Village Pichhore, District Shivpuri, (MADHYA PRADESH). VER S U S RESPONDENTS 1. .n ^ M>^ ^ 3. State of Chhattisgarh, Through; The Secretary, Irrigation Department, D.K.S. Bhawant, Raipur, (CHHATTISGARH) State of Madhya Pradesh, Through ;- The Additional Secretary, Irrigation Departinent, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (MADHYA PRADESH) ( Union of India Through; The Director, Department of personnel and training public grievances and pension, Room No.312, Lok Nayak Bhawan, 3'd Floor, Khan Market, (State Re- organistion Cell), Khan Market, New Delhi 110003. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ l^> ?l HIOH COURT OFJUDICATURE^HHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon'ble Sliri Satish K. Agnihotrl, J. W. P. No. 3094 OF 2003 Petitioner : H.S. SwaraakaT. Versiis Respondents : State of C. G. snd others Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Alok Bakshi, Govt. Advocate for State/'respoudent No. 1. ShriV.C. Ottalwar, counselforrespondent No.2, Shri S.K. Beriwal, counsel for respondent No.S/Union of India. (21st Februas-y, 2006) 1. The petitioner was eiaployed as Sub Enguiecr, in Irrigation Department, at Champa Branch Canal, By order dated 16.9.2002, fhe petitioner has been aUocated to tlie State of Chhattisgarh, contrajy to his optioii. The petitioner beiag resident ofVillage Pichhore, District Shivpuq (M.P.) wants his reaBocation to fhe State ofj!i4adhya Pradesh 2. Leamed counsel for the petitioner subinits Uiat fhe petitioner was allocated to the State of Chltattisgarh vide order dated 16.9.2002, ttie petitioner wants to raake a representation to the respondents/ authorities for considermg his case for reaBocation to the State of Madhya Pradesh, to wtu.ch leamed coiinsel for the respondents have no objection. 3. In viefr of fhe sfoFegoiag, fhe petitioner is granted Ubei-ty to raake a representation befoi'e the concemed aufhorities, The conceraed authorities are accordinelv da-ected to consider aad decide fhe representation, if any, aad to pass order in accoidance with law, wifhui a period of eight weeks froin fhe date of receipt of representation. 4. In view of fhe above, fhe writ petition staads disposed of. No order as to costs. . Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge