... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2261 OF 2000 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2261 OF 2000 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2261 OF 2000 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL NO.3029 OF 2006 FIRST APPEAL NO.3029 OF 2006 FIRST APPEAL NO.3029 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri S.N.Gawade, A.G.P for the Applicant. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : JANUARY 15, 2007. DATE : JANUARY 15, 2007. DATE : JANUARY 15, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned A.G.P for the Applicant. The challenge in the First Appeal is to the Judgment and Award dated 06th April, 1996 in a reference under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Till today there is no ad-interim stay granted in favour of the Applicant. The amount of enhancement in market value granted is very small. Considering these facts, no case is made out for grant of stay. Application for stay is rejected. 2. It is, however, made clear that ... 2 ... withdrawal of the compensation amount by the claimants will be subject to final outcome of the Appeal. If the claimants have already furnished any security for the compensation amount, the security shall be maintained till the final disposal of the Appeal. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE