IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO : 4607 of 2009 Between: Giduthuri Fathima Inyasi, S/o G.Xavier, R/o Block No.94, Ajit Singh Nagar, Vijayawada - 15. Krishna Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of A.P., Through the S.H.O., W.P.S., Saroornagar, Cyberabad. Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. 2 G.Sreelatha, W/o Inyasi, R/o Flat No.108, Sai Sadan Apartments, P & T Colony, Saroornagar, Cyberabad, R.R.Dist. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Section ____ of Crl.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased toto quash the proceedings initiated against the petitioner/accused in C.C.No.154 of 2009 on the file of the Hon'ble XIV Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, L.B.Nagar, R.R.Dist. The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.CHINNAPA REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent. The Court made the following: ORDER PSR, J. Crl.P.No. 4607 of 2009 O r d e r: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri Narasimha Rao Gudiseva, leaned counsel appearing for the second respondent and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 2. The offence alleged is one under section 498-A IPC. A reading of the complaint reveals that there is prima facie case against the petitioner-husband. As such it is not a case where the proceedings in the calendar case – C.C.No. 154 of 2009 on the file of the learned XIV Metropolitan Magistrate, LB.Naar, R.R. District can be quashed. The petition fails and it is accordingly liable to be dismissed. 3. The petition is dismissed. _______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. Dated:29-01-2010 *BVS