IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH L.P.A. No. 742 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision : April 26, 2011 M/s Jagdish Medical Hall, Shop No. 260, Trunk Market, Rajpura, District Patiala ....Appellant Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.S.MANN Present : Mr. R.S.Rai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gautam Dutt, Advocate for the appellant. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M.KUMAR, J. 1. The instant appeal under Clause X of the Letters Patent is directed against the interlocutory order dated 3.3.2011 passed by the learned Single Judge admitting the writ petition only on the question of quantum of punishment and dismissing the same on merit. 2. Notice of the appeal. Mr. Piyush Kant Jain, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab, who is present in the Court accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Four copies of the paper-book have been handed over to him. LPA No. 742 of 2011 (O&M) -2- 3. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the admission order dated 3.3.2011, we are of the considered view that the dismissal of the writ petition on merit has to be by a detailed order. Moreover, a perusal of orders dated 2.12.2010 and 4.2.2011 (P-9) and (P-17) respectively would show that there is no punishment as such proposed except the cancellation of licence. Therefore, the admission of the appeal with regard to quantum of punishment appears to be an error apparent on the face of the record. Therefore, a case for reviewing order dated 3.3.2011 passed by the learned Single Judge is made out. Accordingly, the appellant may approach the learned Single Judge by filing an appropriate application for passing of an order in accordance with law. 4. The appeal stands disposed of with these observations. ( M.M.KUMAR ) JUDGE ( T.P.S.MANN ) April 26, 2011 JUDGE ajay-I