IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.BALACHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH JANUARY 2009 / 8TH MAGHA 1930 RP.No. 1355 of 2008 --------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WA.1382/2008 Dated 29/09/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/RESPONDENT IN WA: -------------------------------------------------------------- M.K.RAJAN, WORKSHOP INSTRUCTOR (CIVIL ENGINEERING), GOVERNMENT POLYTECHINIC, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SMT.I.SHEELA DEVI RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS IN WA: ----------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURMAM. BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.MEERA THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: J.B.Koshy, Ag.C.J. & K.P.Balachandran, J. ------------------------------------------ R.P.No. 1355 of 2008 ------------------------------------------ Dated, this the 28th day of January, 2009 ORDER J.B.Koshy, Ag.C.J. We see no ground to review the judgment under review. A petition for review cannot be equated with an appeal or a petition for rehearing of the matter. Annexure A1 produced by the review petitioner was considered specifically in the impugned judgment. If the judgment is erroneous, the remedy of the petitioner is to file an appeal before the Honourable Supreme Court. Review petition is dismissed. J.B.Koshy (Ag. Chief Justice) K.P.Balachandran (Judge) vns