Sin^,. -w^k *-?WEI ^' INTHE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, AT-BILASPURfC.G.) WRIT PETITION No,^35~^QF2004 •e^r ^> BETWEEN PETITIONER \-"' s^^' »f.!.--^ ^ .-•••"^•y ^<><p'</' .....<^>y' ^yL'x" ^y ' VERSUS ^ RESPONDENTS V.K.THAKUR AGED - 59 YEARS, SON OF SHRI B. P. THAKUR AT PRESENT WORKING AS - BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER, AT- 0/0 BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICE, CHHURJYA, DISTRICT - RAJNANDGAON (C.G.) R/0- CHHURIYA, DISTRICT- RAJNANDGAON (C.G.) L.__ STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH - THE SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT MANTRALAYA D.K.S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR. SHRI R. A. SAHU, INCHARGE PRINCIPAL, GOVT. H.S.S. GAINDATOLA, DISTRICT - RAJNANDGAON (C.G.) WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE- 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 5. Tpi^ra^m^ \dwsi'r-«i«io<i,yTal1<-i<is,Rww^ t^.r-M^ //^<s"z// o^ ^...............................^^200 3TI^TWR^l<h nww^^Tw+iicp ,^>- 3n^?Tq^F(^fg^) 10.11.2005 Petitk>ner by Shn R\ Respondent No. 1 bl None for Responder|t The petitioner is woi Higher Secondaiy School| smee July, 1988. He 26.10.2004 as-.Block Rajnandgaon. The on 2.11.2004. Said tranfe modified vide order petitioner and rcsponde4 petitioner filed this 10.11.2004.' ^as E^iieation petitioi|ier datdd petl^on This CoLirt after mtenm order on 8.12.2001 aUowed to contiaue as Bld petitioner is workmg as Bl^ normal cu'ciimstahces fhisl <pi<i[o4)7T^i+iol'^'fe^ xRi^ix ^ari^rsn^T ; ^, K. Keshaiwaiii, Advocate. ^ Shri Sachia Rajput, Paael lawyer. No.2. [•king as officiatiag Pruacipal at Govt. Gaindatola, Distiict- Rajnaadgaon transfen'ed vide brder dated Officer, Chuida, Distiict- had joiaed the office at Churia ^fer order dated 26.10.2004 was 10.11.2004 in respect of the \t No.2 (Shri R. A. Sahu). The chaUengiag the oider dated hea^ing the petitioner has passed the 4. Accordmgly, the petitioner was ck Education Officer, Chuna. The ck Education Officer at Chiiria. lu Court does not interfere with the SP/FS/2005-20,000 ^ <TPf€^T^1T<ft \jxw|-T<||<yio^A|,ynlxi«iQ>,!qcl)W^<f ^3^/o^ aff^^TqiTRiicp ^HOT^^TaRN? -^.A^- 3n^Tq^R(yitg<si<8^ ^1^200 ?^ITSR^1i?r3TI^9T -T.-t traiisfer order when fhd exigency, not on aay ot4< powers or contrary to f4< case it is apparent tho} coiirse. There was no al|f fhe petitioner has alre^ Ofiicer, Chziria on accoiij on 8.12.2004. The resp<|i other appropriate ordeil adiniaistration, In view of fhe foregcj xRFqfg^^^TFR^^"fe^xl^l^ix ^3rf^TOT^^T saoffe is passed in adniuustrative lr groiind wifh m.ala&de exercise of provisions of law. In titie present fhe order was passed ia normal 'gation of nialafide. Even otherwise Ldy reiaaiaed as Block Edzication it of fhe stay graated by fhis Coiirt ^ndents aj:e at Uberty to pass any if necessaiy in fhe iaterest of |tag the petition stands disposed of, Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge y^ SP/FS/2005-2j6,000 '^.^ '^ %