IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1773 of 2007 RAM BYAS ROY Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 5 18.8.2008 Heard the parties. From Annexure-B to the show cause dated 23.1.2008 it appears that petitioner’s prayer for higher pay scale on account of first time bound promotion with effect from 18.8.1987 and second time bound promotion with effect from 11.6.1989 has been accepted by the authorities. It also appears that one demand of the petitioner has not been accepted but learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that by allowing second time bound promotion with effect from 11.6.1989 the authorities have already given relief to the petitioner and hence, the rejection of third relief appears to be redundant. Be that as it may, the authorities have also filed second show cause which shows that steps have been taken to issue authority slip and pay slip for certain period so that petitioner may get monetary benefit of orders passed in his favour. Now, the main grievance of the petitioner is that the Writ Court had observed in the last paragraph that if petitioner is found entitled to any consequential monetary relief or for revised pension the same should be available to him without any delay but the authorities have not shown in their show cause that any step has 2 been taken to revise the pension and other pensionary relief which were earlier given to the petitioner on the basis of lower pay. A perusal of the both the show cause on behalf of the respondent authorities shows that issue of revising pension has not been considered by the authorities so far. In the facts of the case, the authorities are directed to apply their mind and pass all necessary orders if petitioner is found entitled for revised pension and revised pensionary benefits on account of two reliefs granted to him vide Annexure-B. Such benefit of revised pension or other pensionary benefits should be made available to the petitioner in accordance with law within four months from the date of production/ communication of a copy of this order. It is made clear that if the Accountant General, Bihar finds that there has been any discrepancy and petitioner has been deprived of proper pay scale or revised pay scale and is now entitled for better pay scale in view of orders passed in his favour then he would be at liberty to point out the same to the authorities of the State and ensure that the petitioner gets all the monetary benefits to which he is entitled as per law. This contempt matter is disposed of. (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) sk