IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5917 of 2010 1. AMRENDRA CHANDRA VERMA S/O LATE RAM AYAODHYA PRASAD R/O VILL BALTHARI, P.S.KUCHAIKOTE, DISTT-GOPALGANJ Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE CHAIRMAN , BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD PATNA 3. THE SECRETARY, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD PATNA 4. THE GENERAL MANAGER-CUM-CHIEF ENGINEER TIRHUT AREA ELECTRICITY BOARD, MUZAFFARPUR ----------- 3. 13.04.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and the Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna (hereinafter referred to as the “Board”). 2. Petitioner is the son of late Ram Ayodhya Prasad who died while serving the Board on the post of Lineman in the year 1985. His case for appointment on compassionate ground was rejected by the Board under reasoned order dated 13.07.2002, Annexure-2 against which petitioner filed C.W.J.C.No. 3215 of 2004 which was dismissed under orders dated 29.3.2004, Annexure-4. Against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 29.3.2004, Annexure-4 petitioner preferred Letters Patent Appeal No. 1112 of 2004 which was permitted to be withdrawn under orders dated 30.11.2004, Annexure-5 with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the matter before the authorities of the Board. In the light of the liberty granted by the Division Bench under orders dated 30.11.2004, Annexure-5 petitioner filed representation dated 18.1.2005, Annexure-6 which has not been disposed of. This Court under orders dated 9.4.2010 asked the learned counsel for the Board to seek instruction in the matter as to whether representation of the petitioner dated 18.1.2005, Annexure-6 has been disposed of. In compliance of my order dated 09.04.2010 learned counsel for the - 2 - Board has not taken any instruction in the mater so far. 3. Having heard counsel for the petitioner and the Board, I direct the competent authority of the Board to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 18.1.2005, Annexure-6 in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders over the same as early as possible, in any case within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not considered the grievance of the petitioner on merit. In case, the representation of the petitioner dated 18.1.2005, Annexure-6 is not available on the records of the Board then petitioner is at liberty to furnish the copy thereof along with a certified copy of this order before the authorities of the Board. 4. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)