1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Bail Application No. 6999/2010 Pappu Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 12.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Rajeev Sogarwal- for the petitioner Mr GS Fauzdar - Public Prosecutor BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the matter for taking away motor-cycle, gas stove, mobile and a sum of Rs.11,000/-. Petitioner has been implicated at the stage when he was taken in custody in regard to another case. Otherwise, he is not involved. Charge sheet in the matter has already been filed. Thus petitioner is not required now and, otherwise, he will face the trial. Hence, he may be granted bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has 2 opposed the bail application. After considering rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am of the view that petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is accepted and it is directed that accused-petitioner namely; Pappu may be enlarged on bail under section 439 CrPC in FIR No. 20/2010 registered at Police Station –Uchain, Bharatpur for offence under Section/s 382 and 411 IPC provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.40,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma