IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WPCRL No. 616 of 2008 Ranjeet Singh ……. Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and another ……..Respondents Mohd. Azim, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Pujari, learned Additional Government Advocate. JUDGMENT Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. After hearing Mohd. Azim, learned counsel for the petitioner, I am fully convinced that no interference by this Court in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is warranted. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 5.8.2008 Avneet