IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32437 of 2010 TUN TUN MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 02 28.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as for the State. Petitioner is husband of complainant’s daughter whose marriage has taken place with the petitioner in the 2007 but it is alleged that subsequently the complainant’s daughter was subjected to cruelty and harassment on account of illegal demand and petitioner solemnized his second marriage with one Soniya Devi. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is ready to keep his wife with full honour and dignity and, as a matter of fact, the petitioner has never solemnized his second marriage with any other girl. In view of the aforesaid submissions, in the event of his arrest or surrender within thirty days from the date of communication of this order, petitioner, namely, Tun Tun Mahto is ordered to be released on bail in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 98 of 2009 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, with direction to the learned court below that on being surrendered by the petitioner, the learned court below shall issue notice to the 2 complainant fixing a date for reconciliation and on that very date, the petitioner shall also be made available himself before the learned court below for reconciliation and the learned court below shall take effective steps for reconciliation consecutively three dates and if within the aforesaid three dates proceeding of reconciliation is failed then in that event the learned court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner after giving its finding in respect of the proceeding of the reconciliation. Shahid/Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)