m RESR©N©EN'RS£; iMu; INT~HSMIGB^iMI^©Fei^ya^^A&H^^^ ...?/%MRI I^E1'S^©N^N:0..::;:':.-^^^ .:.:'..: ^'''Bharat Lal ^ahu, aged atBou'E ,f2S;'ygSi-S,:(Prese:nitlY.45):::yeaFsJ'l •fson.Gf Santram Sahu,,-Ex-Ac!-; ftok."' lAssistant,'; ' Teaclher,;1 ; Go^rnment, Pariiarylf(SGHiQal Barid Hiyapara, ,: (2hl-1atauna, ^Tah;.,; Takhatpur,,, Disfii-iGst! „-. ; Bilaspur ' (£:hha isgarh), '^r'gsiclent Qf- yillage ; KI-iiSKkSRa, ^Post Hirri , Via Hirri^ ^ g,D:istf. Bites^uF,(G.^.): \:iv. :.^i :-i ' ^ERgtJ^ :?'^:::g:iSiiiMi ^..li ^ M^SSi ^ :T'l'i6;iState©fChhatffiis,g|Rh,i tlirc3u:g:hi'^':.1 OSpiartrBeht, oE, j, :Ectii)eat:j|G>ri, iD|;K.S. :Bhawan,RaipurtC|:©)ir "sa^ ^2.;y^'T|-ie-. DirgctoF;. L6|k' :,ii'%^l;jS9:n:cMali!ialay,^D.K.S1; .?.:S!^^Rgiplur(]CG);.::^:.::::'^ •aK?;?iri?l'ieC:(3liect:cir,:-'BilaspHr;;(iGCBJ ;^.®?1'hre^';Distrie^':Edueafi!:)[n':i EElyeatiori ; ^DrstC. (iEfthFattisgarh) l £ @"nsKngifi@iiga[^xi :''-^'^""s.':%iS^'%ffle-rStatGSof^^ :l-^:.:S^I,^^hroug;h|,.-:;:.-':j'the4'. '.. .,'j:'f':^e^]^l:^^^p'^[ae^Mrp . • :i- • :^:?;;;! :-:.;':i'SriSS\J(feMBBh:'j^:i:.^BI-iavvSff, lr :^i§hQpiaj-i ;''':fs:';^''.^ll:^:';^::.''.S:3'FfK^ miS't^StMX'iBUiiiEU.S:Si^fS27^ ~WEfi ShlltsBan 'Bh|i®8ai)l^ IN^ giia|sii:tiijjE K-il ? 'i -»- !l;ii3iiSi?tw;R'ii*' ji ^T^t^i?c*fitt» 4 A: :3^''<41^!<'t''J,Wtll%IS,^[w"li<-iy<' ^:^i <nwtra»w^i 200 gn^r'q?R?('jci[yx,'sr)1 wratsfeoii^i Slm%N.Bhal<ta,counSeIfor1 ..; ShfR Bfta^oc .Pyasi, leametl advancecopy. VAFNO. 990SS004 for urgent I.A.No. 9908/04 is also allovfi documente. ' | i Leamea counsel for the p[ hoc/reappbihfmentofthe-petitjoher. may be given an opportunity offilin^ No,2 / DiFectbr, LpkShiksfian Sanch4 in accordancB wfl'th law. [learing isallowed. |ed. Exemption is grantedfrom filing typed copyof fetitioner- subniite that the matter relates to ad- ^. . • ' . : • • :.; • |He futther submi&.that for the present the petitioher the detailed representation before the respondent (Inalaya, whiehshall be considared in jtsown merte Having cQnsidered and, in the opinion ofthis Court, ends of petitioner fo make a detailed No. 2 / Director, Lok Shikshan order, within~;15.days,'and6n'such Director, Lok Shikshan Sanchalnali accordance with law as early as pds; receipt of the'reptesentation.: ,lf is petitioner may avail the remedy avail With the aforesaid observatie^s tn view of fhis orcfer M.W.P.Ma. ^rqf?T;ift14 tnl4^tl'^f {^L4l <p(f^i_< ^sifimsf^r . '' he petilioner. Panel Lawyer for the respondents 7 State on i.thispetitjonstandsdisposedof . 5263/04 standsdisposedof- .wthpptexpresslng anyopinion on tbe merits of the case, [ Ijusticewill be ser/ed jf a direction is given;to the : represejitation raising his grievances beforethe respondent Sanc|ialnalaya along with a copy ofthe petitien and this represenlation .being filed, the resppndent'No; 2/ |iya shall decide the same on its owri'merite in trble preferablywithin three months from thedate of thade.Glear that if any grieyancel still remains, the. IbleundBFthelaw. • ' ' i ..