IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 7014 of 2010 Date of Decision: October 27, 2010 Vinod Kumar. …Petitioner Versus Haryana Financial Corporation and another. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Paramjeet S. Dhaliwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Plaintiff – petitioner has invoked supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assailing the order dated 25.01.2010 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Mansa, as well as, order dated 09.09.2010 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Mansa, whereby application moved by the plaintiff under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. seeking C.R. No.7014 of 2010 restraint order against the defendants not to sell the specific portion of the joint property till the partition of the property, was rejected. It is the settled position of law that even if any specific portion is sold out of the joint property, it would not adversely affect the right of the joint owner. Such sale deed shall be void beyond the share of vendor. Joint property shall be open for partition. In view of this, no further order is required. Petition stand disposed of. October 27, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2