IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1501 of 2010 THAKUR SURESH PRASAD SINGH son of Thakur Baidyanath Singh, resident of village-Madhopur Nijhama, P.S.-Mahua, Dist.- Vaishali Versus THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION namely, N.Ahmad, Vaishali at Hajipur, Dist.-Vaishali ----------- 3. 23.3.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. A show cause has been filed on behalf of the State stating therein to the effect that order has been complied with and necessary order as per memo no.808 dated 10th July, 2010 as contained in annexure-A to the show cause has been passed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the aforesaid order is not correct and, as such, the petitioner proposes to assail the same. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, since the representation of the petitioner has been disposed of by passing a necessary order, contempt proceeding need not proceed further. However, it will be open to the petitioner to bring to the notice of the concerned authority with regard to discrepancy, if any, in the order and/or any further amount is still payable. The contempt petition stands disposed of. Md.S. ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)