IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.969 of 2008 Birendra Prasad Singh Versus State of Bihar & Ors. ----------- 12. 30.6.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that Goh Police Station Case No.22 of 2008 is not being properly investigated as would be appearing that uptill now the investigation of the aforesaid case has not been completed. It is submitted that in the aforesaid case, considering the nature of the allegations, the accused persons ought to have been arrested. Besides, the petitioner is also in dire need of being protected. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State submits that the investigation of the case is being properly done. However, learned counsel is not in a position to explain the delay in completion of the investigation. Considering the submissions of the parties, it is expedient in the interest of justice that the investigation of the aforesaid case be completed expeditiously without unnecessary delay and upon completion of the investigation, police report be submitted forthwith. It goes without saying that as required, the petitioner will always be ready to assist the investigating officer so that the investigation may be completed expeditiously. It will be open for the petitioner to bring it to the notice of the concerned Superintendent of - 2 - Police with cogent information/materials with regard to any grievance with respect to investigation, which would be looked into by the Superintendent of Police and if need be, he shall take remedial measure as well. The writ application stands disposed of. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)