... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.142 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.142 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.142 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri P.B.Patil for the Applicant. Shri Vilas Jadhav holding for Shri Akhilesh Singh for the Respondent No.1. Shri Rajesh More, A.P.P for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : OCTOBER 16, 2006. : OCTOBER 16, 2006. : OCTOBER 16, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocates appearing for the parties. The learned Advocate for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 strongly opposes the Application for condonation of delay. 2. Delay is of 74 days. Considering the averments made in paragraph Nos.2 and 3 of the Application, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Rule is made absolute and delay is condoned. Place the Revision Application after vacation before the appropriate court on 14th November, 2006. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE