IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10242 of 2009 M/S BIHAR RUBBER BELTING INDUSTRIAL AREA, FATUHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02. 21.08.2009 In the present writ application annexure-4 dated 30.6.2007 passed by the respondent BIADA has been challenged by the petitioner. By virtue of this order the lease of the Unit stands cancelled and the registration as well. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the law having been settled in this regard in the case of Deepak Paints (P) Ltd vs. State of Bihar & its analogous cases, reported in 2008 (2) PLJR 293, even this order is required to be interfered with. Learned senior counsel representing the respondents submits that after passing of the order by this Court in Deepak Paints (P) Ltd (supra), many developments have taken place and therefore, decision has to be rendered. He, therefore, is not in a position to say as to what is the current status of this case. Be that as it may, if any fresh decision has been taken by the respondents in relation to the Unit of the petitioner after the decision in the case of Deepak Paints (P) Ltd. rendered by this Court, then petitioner will be covered by the same, but if no decision has been taken by the respondents after passing of the order impugned, then needless to say that law laid down in Deepak Paints (P) Ltd. will govern the - 2 - issue. The writ application stands allowed with the above observation. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)