WP(C) 717/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Hai, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Handique, learned Stat e Counsel appearing for the respondents. As agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for disposal at the order stage itself. The petitioner, by the present petition, has claimed adequate compensation for t he alleged loss sustained by him contending inter alia that on 11th December, 20 08 while he was carrying certain poultry and poultry produced in the vehicle, th e same was intercepted by Basisthat police and all his poultry and poultry produ cts were detained at Khanapara for the purpose of culling. The petitioner has r aised certain dispute, which cannot be resolved in a writ proceeding. The petiti oner claimed compensation for the alleged culling of the poultry for which the p etitioner has to approach the appropriate civil Court having jurisdiction over t he matter. That being the position, the relief as sought for by the petitioner in the prese nt petition cannot be granted and hence rejected. It would, however, not preclude the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum having jurisdiction over the matter for seeking appropriate relief. The writ petition is disposed of. No cost.