1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRS HIGH COURT DATED:19.01.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN W.P.(MD)No.369 of 2011 R.Vijayakumar .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Collectors Office, Madurai-625 020. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai-625 020. 4.The Thasildhar, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai-20 .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to dispose the representation of the petitioner, dated 29.07.2010 within the stipulated time prescribed by this court. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Vellaiswamy For Respondents : Mr.V.Rajasekaran Spl.Government Pleader O R D E R By consent, this writ petition is taken up for disposal. 2.Heard Mr.K.Vellaiswamy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.V.Rajesekaran, learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents. 3.The petitioner has come up with a limited prayer to direct the respondents to consider his representation, dated 29.07.2010. 4.It is the case of the petitioner that he was one of the candidates for the post of Triune Officer along with one Thirugnanam, who also appeared for the same and he was selected. Aggrieved by the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 same, the petitioner filed an appeal and the appeal was allowed with a direction to consider his application on merits. In the meanwhile, the said post was abolished. However, Thirugnamam was appointed as Village Administrative Officer. Therefore, the same logic and yardstick in the case of Thirugnaman to be applied to the case of the petitioner also. Therefore, he made a detailed representation, dated 29.07.2010 and the same is pending consideration and hence, this writ petition. 5.The learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents after going through the material documents annexed in the typed set of papers submitted that the respondents may be directed to consider the representation of the petitioner within a reasonable time limit. 6.Considering the above circumstances of this case and in view of the limited prayer sought for in the writ petition to direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner, without adverting into the merits of the case, the first respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 29.07.2010, in accordance with law and on merits and pass appropriate orders within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar(LA) /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar To, 1.The Commissioner for Revenue Administration Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Collectors Office, Madurai-625 020. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai-625 020. 4.The Thasildhar, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai-20. +1cc to Mr.K.Vellaiswamy, Advocate, Sr.No.1975 +one cc to Special Government Pleader, Sr.No. 2109 W.P.(MD)No.369 of 2011 19.01.2011 er/SMA/2.2.2011/7C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/