1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5696 OF 2010 (Shri Meghshyam Bhagwat vs. Vishwanath Chintanwar & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DECEMBER 02, 2010. Shri Wagh, learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is landlord. Contention is, Respondent No. 1 is in illegal occupation of block belonging to the petitioner. His electric supply was permanently disconnected by Respondent No. 2 – MSEDCL. Suppressing the fact of illegal occupation and pendency of Rent Control proceedings, the suit came to be filed and appellate Court has directed restoration of electric supply by granting temporary injunction. The learned counsel states that no objection certificate of the petitioner is essential and as per provisions of Section 29(7) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, Respondent No. 1 ought to have taken appropriate steps in this respect. Admittedly, the electric supply was disconnected by Respondent No. 2 and not by the petitioner. Respondent No. 1 is in illegal occupation, according to the petitioner, since last more than 10 years. Dispute between them is going on before the 2 competent forum. Respondent No. 2 has received its dues and hence the appellate Court has directed it to restore electric supply. The petitioner is not at all involved in the matter. Petition as filed is totally misconceived. Hence, the same is rejected with no order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.