1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2127 OF 2003 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2127 OF 2003 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2127 OF 2003 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.744 OF 2003 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.744 OF 2003 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.744 OF 2003 The State of Maharashtra : Petitioner. versus Mahadu Chindha Ugale & Anr. : Respondents. Smt.V.R.Bhosale, APP, for the State. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE V.K.TAHILRAMANI JJ. V.K.TAHILRAMANI JJ. V.K.TAHILRAMANI JJ. DATED : MARCH 10, 2006. DATED : MARCH 10, 2006. DATED : MARCH 10, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This is an application filed by the State for condonation of delay of 24 days in filing the appeal. The office note shows that Respondent No.1 is dead and Respondent No.2 is served. Nobody is present for Respondent No.2 to oppose 2 2 2 this application. Explanation given for delay is satisfactory. Hence the application is allowed. Delay is condoned. So far as Respondent No.1 is concerned, he is dead, therefore, this appeal abates against him. Record also shows that one more Appeal i.e. Appeal No.330/03 is pending. Therefore, put up both the appeal on board after two weeks. [D.G.DESHPANDE] [D.G.DESHPANDE] [D.G.DESHPANDE] [V.K.TAHILRAMANI] [V.K.TAHILRAMANI] [V.K.TAHILRAMANI]