THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO WRIT PETITION No.9785 of 2010 Date: 27.04.2010 Between: Rohit Kashyap Vattipalli … Petitioner and The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad and others. … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO WRIT PETITION No.9785 of 2010 ORAL ORDER : (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice D.S.R.Varma) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Assistant Government Pleader, representing the learned Advocate General, appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2. 2. This Writ of Habeas Corpus is filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondents to produce his wife, namely Smt. Nikita Kajaria, who is allegedly in the illegal custody of respondent No.3, before this Court and set her at liberty, forthwith. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that he and the alleged detenu fell in love and married each other on 13.7.2009 at Ganapathi Temple, Lakshmikanth Nagar, Mysore. The grievance of the petitioner is that his wife had left his company owing to the force of the 3rd respondent, who is her father, and presently she is staying with her parents. Therefore, he seeks production of his wife before this Court. 4. In this regard, it is to be seen that no complaint is lodged by the petitioner before the police about the illegal detention of the alleged detenu by the 3rd respondent. Admittedly, the alleged detenu is a major. Under what circumstances, the alleged detenu had been disassociated with the petitioner is not known. However, the allegation of the petitioner is that the alleged detenu was forcibly detained by the 3rd respondent-father. 5. This is a fact to be verified and investigated into, which exercise cannot be done by this Court. Therefore, the best course of action available to the petitioner is to lodge a complaint before the police concerned seeking redressal of his grievance. Furthermore, the alleged detenu is a major and she has every liberty to live anywhere as per her will and wish. Since the alleged detenu is in the custody of her parents, we cannot accept the contention of the petitioner that she was forcibly taken away by her parents. 6. Subject to above observations, the writ petition is dismissed, at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA _________________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO 27.04.2010. Msr THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO WRIT PETITION No.9785 of 2010 27.04.2010 (Msr)