alg” HIGH QQURT QF JUDlgATURE AT BLASPUR, $HHATT§GARH DIVlSlON BENCH SCREW} : HCN’BLE SHRI SR. NAYAK, CJ. & HON’BLE $HRI D‘R. DESHMUKH, J. Miss. Agpeal NQ. 143$ QF ZQO5 APPLICANT Smt. MithHa Bai, Wlo Gaiduram Sknha. Aged about 28 years, Qccupation —- Labaurer, Residént sf Vinage Navagarh Darripam, District Durg (C9) CLAIMANT Vs. RESPONDENTS 1. Mahegh Kumar Jaiswai, S/a Badri Prasad Jaiswa}, Veh§de Driver, R/a NGN-APPUCANTS ViHage Baba Mohtra, Pause Station Bemetra, Dis‘h'ict Durg (CG), 2. Punitram Jaiswal, Son of Bakhariva Ram Jaiswal, Vehic‘e 0wner, Rio. Navégarh Mandlr Ward‘ Bakarpami Tahsi} Navagarh, R3, Bemetara,'Di$trict Burg (C.G.) 3. The Natianat Insurance Company Limited, Through Branch Manager, Branch Office at Kamthiline, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Wesent: Mr.Abhi$hek $harma, ‘earned coun$el far the appellant. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 183 January, 2006) The fonowmg oral order of the Court was passed by SR. Nayak, QJ. In this appeat mare compensation is sought. $2 was contended that the appeilant—insured has sustained 45% permanent~disability of peivic bone. Admittedty, the doctor who treated the appetiant was not examrned in this case. in the absence of acceptabie medicai evtdence to show that the appetlant, as a matter of fact, had sustained 45% permanent disabimy of peivie bone, awarding compensation tOWarde toss of future income ‘ woutd not arise. The medical certifieate iteeif is not a piece of evidence.