IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 22ND JANUARY 2009 / 2ND MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 25594 of 2007(V) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- MOIDEEN KUNJU A., KALLUMPURATHU VADAKKATHIL, PALACKAL, THEVALAKKARA P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.RAMAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 4. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SASTHAMCOTTA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. GOVT.PLEADER SMT.SUDHA DEVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/01/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 25594 OF 2007 (V) ==================== Dated this the 22nd day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T The allegation in the writ petition is that the petitioner is a person suffering from mental disorder. It is stated that his close relatives have manhandled him, inflicted severe injuries and manipulated documents and took possession of his landed properties. It is on this allegation the writ petition is filed praying for directing the 2nd respondent to take action on Ext.P1 and further direct that action be taken against the persons mentioned in the complaint. 2. Although the dispute raised is not one which can be resolved in a proceedings under Article 226, taking note of the allegations in the writ petition, this Court passed order dated 21/11/2008 directing that the writ petition be placed before the Legal Services Authority functioning in the High Court of Kerala. 3. Accordingly, after enquiries, the Member Secretary of the Kerala State Legal Services Authority vide his communication dated 13/1/2009, made available a copy of the report obtained from Sri.G.Sanal Kumar, Chairman(Munsiff- Magistrate), Kunnathur Taluk Legal Services Committee, Sasthamcotta dated 16/12/2008. The report also does not WPC 25594/07 :2 : support the case as pleaded in the writ petition. 4. In the result, the petitioner cannot be granted any relief in this writ petition. Writ petition fails, but however, without prejudice to his rights, if any, to move the appropriate forum. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp