Criminal Misc. No.M-24489 of 2008 Present: Mr. Vimal Kumar Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Senior DAG, Haryana. Ms.Meenu Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2 --- An FIR No.101, dated 2nd August, 2008, was registered at Police Station Sadar Jagadhri, under Sections 323, 324, 506 IPC. During the pendency of investigation, the parties arrived at a compromise. Counsel for the petitioners has sought quashing of FIR on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. He has placed on record a copy of the compromise (Annexure P-2). On the last date of hearing i.e. on September 19, 2008, learned counsel for the respondent- State was directed to verify the factum of compromise. Learned counsel on instructions from S.I. Nathi Ram, who is present in the Court, has stated that the compromise has, in fact, taken place between the parties. Petitioner No.1-Ram Singh as well as complainant-Yashpal are present in the Court today and they have filed their affidavits separately. Ram Singh has been identified by his counsel Mr. Vimal Kumar Gupta, while the complainant-Yashpal has been identified by his counsel Ms.Meenu Sharma, Advocate and they have admitted the factum of compromise dated 3.8.2008 arrived at between them. In view of the compromise (Annexure P-2) and statements/affidavits of petitioner No.1-Ram Singh as well as complainant-Yashpal filed in the Court today, the FIR No.101, dated 2nd August, 2008, registered at Police Station Sadar Jagadhri, under Sections 323, 324, 506 IPC, is hereby quashed. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 08.01.2009 sanjeev