IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 9TH APRIL 2010 / 19TH CHAITHRA 1932 CRP.No. 1238 of 2005() ---------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 30/07/2005 IN EA 113/05 IN EP 16/95 IN LAR.1/1993 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,ATTINGAL .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): JUDGEMENT DEBTOR/DEFENDANT ----------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER, ATTINGAL. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV.SRI.SHYSON.P.MANGUZHA RESPONDENT(S): DECREE HOLDERS/ PLAINTIFFS & 2ND DEFENDANTS ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. KRISHNA PILLAI CHANDRASEKHARAN NAIR, KRISHNAVILASAM, CHITTATTINKARA DESOM, AVANAVANCHERRY VILLAGE (DIED). 2. SUBHADRADEVI AMMA, M/O.INDIRA BAI AMMA, KRISHNAVILASAM, CHITTATTINKARA DESOM, AVANAVANCHERRY VILLAGE. 3. SINDHU, D/O.SUBADRA DEVI AMMA, KRISHNAVILASAM, CHITTATTINKARA DESOM, AVENANCHERRY VILLAGE. 4. SOBHA, D/O.SUBADRA DEVI AMMA, KRISHNAVILASAM, CHITTATTINKARA DESOM, AVANAVANCHERRY VILLAGE. ADV. SRI.SIBY MATHEW FOR R2-R4 SRI.A.A.MOHAMMED NAZIR FOR R2-R4 THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J ------------------------------------- C.R.P No.1238 OF 2005 -------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of April 2010 ORDER Revision is directed against the order dated 30.07.2005 in E.A No.113 of 2005 in E.P No.16 of 1995 in L.A.R No.1 of 1993 on the file of the Sub Court, Attingal by the learned Sub Judge. The above application was moved by the State through the Additional Government Pleader for lifting the attachment over some public offices as ordered by the court, on deposit of the amount covered by the decree. After examining the matter the learned Sub Judge passed an order lifting the attachment partially. The attachment order passed over 25 cents where the Taluk office is situate was retained. Aggrieved by that order the State has preferred this revision. At the time of hearing the learned counsel for the decree holder submitted that the entire amount covered by the decree had been deposited by the State and it was already released by the court as well. If that be so, if the attachment as indicated above had been ordered to secure the decree in the present case no further continuance of the attachment over a public office or the property where it is situate is called for. The registry was directed to ascertain whether the attachment over the land comprising the above Taluk office is still subsisting. It is reported, no separate order has been C.R.P No.1238 OF 2009 Page numbers passed after passing of the impugned order lifting the attachment only partially. The court below is directed to examine the matter and pass appropriate orders whether the continuance of the attachment over the Govt. land comprising the Taluk office is called for in the facts and circumstances of the case and also to satisfy the decree passed in the above case. There will be a direction to the court to pass appropriate orders thereof within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Subject to the above directions, the revision is closed. Sd/- S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN JUDGE //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE vdv