1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.275 OF 2010 (Suresh Raghunath Patil vs. Sardarsingh Ratansingh Girase) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr.S.P.Chapalgaonkar, Adv., h/f Mr. Vijay Anjanwatikar, Adv., for the applicant. Mr.Paturkar, Adv., h/f Mr.Nandode, Adv., for the respondent. ... CORAM: SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATE:25-6-2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard Mr. S.P.Chapalgaonkar, Counsel, holding for Mr.Vijay Anjanwatikar, Counsel for the applicant and Mr.Paturkar, Counsel, holding for Mr.Nandode, Counsel, for the respondent. 2. This is an application preferred by the applicant for condonation of delay of 60 days caused in filing the accompanying application (No.274/2010) seeking 2 leave to file appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dt.22nd July, 2009. 3. Learned Counsel for the respondent vehemently opposed the present application and submitted that the present application bears no substance. the same is devoid of merits and the same be rejected. 4. Considering the rival submissions, it appears that, the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily. It also appears that the said delay is not wilful, deliberate and intentional and, therefore, the same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 5. In the result, present application (No.275/2010) is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) thereto and delay of 60 days caused in filing an application seeking leave to file appeal is condoned and present 3 application((No.275/2010) stands disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P.DAVARE) JUDGE ... agp/275-10crapl