IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.626 of 2010 MANI BHUSHAN RAI @ MANI BHUSHAN YADAV Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 04.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Permission is granted to make necessary correction in paragraph-13 of the application. Having similar allegations, co-accused namely, Jaleshwar Rai, Sadhu Rai, Rajpal Rai and Rampal Rai @ Rambal Rai vide Cr. Misc. No. 11878 of 2010 and co-accused namely, Rakesh Rai and Raj Kumar Ram vide Cr. Misc. No. 6252 of 2010, as contained in Paragraph No. 13 of the application, have been allowed bail by a Bench of this Court without the help of Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and protection of Children) Act. So, there could be no justification to refuse petitioner’s bail having the above privilege. In such view of the matter, the revision application is also allowed. Let the above named petitioner be directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate (Juvenile Board), Saran at Chapra in Amnour P.S. Case No. 18 of 2009. One of the bailers shall be the father of the petitioner, who would undertake to keep the petitioner under his observation and produce whenever is required by the Juvenile Justice Board or 2 Court. Accordingly, the order dated 12.04.2010 passed by the Sessions Judge, Saran, Chapra in Cr. Appeal No. 06 of 2010 and J. Tr. No. 422 of 2010 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Saran, Chapra are hereby set aside. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)