IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 35949 of 2010 Gurmail Singh .....Petitioner VERSUS Surjit Singh and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. S.S. Walia, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner seeks action under Section 133 Cr.P.C. for having caused nuisance against the respondents, who have closed the path, which is gair mumkin rasta. Both the Courts below have noticed that this path was closed on the basis of resolution passed by the Panchayat and an alternative passage has been provided. Counsel for the petitioner contends that such a mode could be only permitted by the Government and the Panchayat was not competent to pass such a resolution. Even if that be so, it would not be a case of nuisance which could invite proceedings under Section 133 Cr.P.C. If the petitioner is aggrieved against the action or order in passing the resolution for giving path, which is different than what was provided earlier, he may have his remedy against that order. No case for interference in the impugned orders is made out. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. December 06, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE