IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46076 of 2009 PANKAJ KUMAR, S/o Shachhi Bhushan Prasad. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 08.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that even though the allegation against the petitioner is that he was a seller of stolen mobile but there is no previous case instituted against him and therefore this allegation is only bald in nature, let the petitioner above named who is in custody since 14.07.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Kumar Madhavendra, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bhojpur at Ara (or his successor in the office) in connection with Ara Town (Ara Nagar) P.S. Case No. 232 of 2009 (S.Tr. No. 2739 of 2009) subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close - 2 - relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)