@ HE3H C§R§R? QF CE‘%H&TT¥SQI£RH 31W EELASPUR DiWSiQN EEMQH QEJQQM: H§N§ELE SHQ mfEEV GUPTA, C3. H§N53LE SHW T.P,SHARMA, J. mm: Qpg’wa No.’i?2I2WAE - M§E>S &?PE§§= U§E£R §E€§'§'i€3?\§ WE? 5:?{3'E’QR 'aiEi’ikZ‘LE £aé3? $Q¢3£ Present Shri SC. Verma and Sim AL. Singraul, £aamed counseé for the appeilant. Nana far respondems N0. and 3 thgugh served. Shn‘ Sudhér Agrawai, ieamed counsai for respandant No. 2. GREER (13th Januaryg 2am The faEowing order Gf the Court‘was pa$sLacf m R&§aev @ug3$a§, SAL 1 £§PELLA§§€ Vigay Kumar Banjare S/‘s Sri Shyam CLANANT Raina Banjare, Aged about 18 years, RIO VéElage — Jarway, Thana w Amanakg, Tahsii & Distt ~ Raipur (06> Vea‘ws RESPGNDEN‘m 1, Sita Ram Sahu S/o Sr§ Mansha Ram NQN-IExPPHcAMW Sahu, Rfo Bhiia§ Dabrapara, EhiEai Distt Durg(CG} >2. The Oriental §n5u¥anse Company Limited‘ Thrsugh : Divisionai Manager, {l‘évismnal Qfféce —- Kachahai Chewia Jaii Road — Fiaépur {CG} 3. Foo! Kumar Kewat 3m Sri RupNa‘th Kewat, Aged abou’t~32 years RIG Khursépar—Bhiiai, Tahsii & Dis§t w Burg {CG} @ Learned counse! for the partieS are heard an M.(C.}P. No.10821’2004, a petition far candenaiion of the deiay in f§}ing‘the appwL 2} On due conssidei'ation, M(C.)R No.108‘2/2004 is allowed and {ha de§ay in fiEing the appeai 3s hereby condoned. 3) Shri SC. Verma, Earned ceunse! for the appeiiant is heard on admission 4) Appel!ant Vijay Kumar Benjare is seeking enhancement of the compensation awarded by the First Additionai Motor Aseideni Ciaims Tiibuna], Raipur (for 5hori “the Tribunai") vide award dated i 1 .082003, passed in Ciaim Case Ne.154!2002. 5) Ae against the compensation of Re.’i4,9@,i30®f— oiaimed by the appeiiantioiaimant, by filing a claim peéiiien under $eciion 168 e? ihe Meter Vehioies Aoi, foi’ the injuriee sustained by him in the motor ascident an 16.05.2QG2, the Tribunai awarded a totai sum ei Rs.2,GQGf- as compensation along with interest @ 5% er annum fmm the date of tiiing ef the claim petition tiil the date oi actual payment 6) 3hri SC. Verma, teamed oouneel for the appeliant vehementiv argued that the Tribunal has erred m awarding tew compensation of Re.2,GGOf— cnlv though the appeitant/ciaimaht sustained muitiple iniuries in the meter accident. T} F09: the reasons best known to the appeiiant/claimant, he F'y easier s was examined before the Tribunal to establish the nature eev cf ‘he in}u¥‘£e$ saw ta have bean $u$tained by me appeélgni/‘claémam in the meior aaciaieni and the fam that these mums resuited in any permanent disability. .5? in ihis 5mg 9f ev§dence, we d9 n0": fmd any acope m enhancgment gf the compewation awarded by the TribunaL 9) The appeal fued by the appenant/Gmmani ‘gcr ehhancemeni cf the campenea‘taon, therefme, is liable to be dismiased and is hereby dismisseed summariw. Sd/— ‘T.P. Sharma Judge subbu