IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3166 of 2011 RAMJEE MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 17.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named in the first information report with allegation that he and co-accused Jagdish Yadav opened fire on the informant’s husband but in course of investigation, informant specifically stated that it was petitioner who opened fire on her husband as a result of which informant’s husband died then and there. Although, learned counsel for the petitioner tried to convince me placing this fact before this Court that earlier the father of the petitioner was murdered by the deceased for which a case was instituted and that is the reason petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case, but I am not, at all, convinced with the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for bail in connection with Islampur P.S Case No. 121 of 2010, stands rejected. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )