1 Cri-A-124-10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 124 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra ... Applicant (Orig. Respondent) vs. Shri Paresh Kaniyalal Shukla. ... Respondent (Org.Applicant/accused) Ms. A.T.Javeri, APP, for the applicant - State. Ms. Pooja Bhojane, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 22nd February, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. The State has preferred this application for cancellation of bail granted to the respondent in Crime No.364/2009 registered at Powai Police Station for the offences under Sections 406, 409,420 read with Section 34 of IPC. 3. According to prosecution, one Sadarth Retail Ltd. was promoted by some persons and they collected huge money from the people by giving assurance that within 20 days their money would be doubled. The respondent was a commission agent for persuading the people to invest money in the said company 2 Cri-A-124-10.sxw and he was getting 10% commission on the investment. On the report lodged by Senior Inspector of Police, Powai Police Station, offence was registered. The present applicant was grated anticipatory bail as per the order dated 3.12.2009 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai. At that time, investigation was still in progress. The learned Additional Sessions Judge noted that several other persons, who were directors and finance directors were already arrested and huge amount was also recovered. The bank accounts of the company were already sealed. 4. Learned APP concedes that after grant of anticipatory bail to the present applicant, other accused were also granted bail. Investigation was completed and charge sheet is also filed. In view of this, no purpose will be served by cancellation of anticipatory bail. Therefore, the application stands rejected. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)