IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINTIAL Criminal With Petition No. 93 of 2009 Naresh Kumar S/o Sri Bhawani Dutt ……….. Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …………. Respondents Mr. Lalit Miglani, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.C. Pujari, Addl. G.A. for respondent No. 1 and 2. None for respondent No.3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Lalit Miglani, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.C. Pujari, Addl. G.A. for respondent No. 1 and 2. None for respondent No.3. 2. After due consideration of the submission of the learned counsel for the parties; contents of the F.I.R.; the fact that there is a cross case lodged by the present petitioner against the information party; the fact that both the parties have submitted the injuries on the persons; and in the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find that the petitioner is entitled to get the reliefs claimed in the writ petition. 3. The writ petition, therefore, fails and is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. 4. I am refraining form commenting on the merits of the case lest it may adversely affect the petitioner’s case at the trial, which is yet to start. 5. However, keeping in view that both the parties have sustained the injuries in this case, it is made clear if the petitioner moves bail petition before the court below, his bail petition shall be disposed of expeditiously without waste of time. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 18.03.2009 Shiv