* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 42 + C.M(M)790/2010 KARTAR SINGH & ORS. Petitioners Tliroiigh; Mr. S.S. Panwar with Mr. Siinil Dutt Baloni, Advocates versus DEVI SAHAI & ORS. Respondents Through; None CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER % 03.06.2010 CM.No.10784-10785/2010 (for exemption) The exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The applications are disposed of C.M(iVn790/2010 &CM.NO.10786/20I0 (for stay) 1. The Petitioners/Plaintiffs filed suit No.1044 of 1972 for recovery of possession of the property at Khasra No.847/1 (17 Biswas), Village Mahipalpur,Delhi ('suitproperty'). By an orderdated 17^'^ November1997 in RCA No. 173 of 1990 filed by the Respondents, the learned Additional District Judge (ADJ) directed the Tehsildar, Vasant Vihar to prepare a demarcation report in accordance with revenue law pertaining to Khasra No.554 and 847/1 of Village Mahipalpur. ;iVi(M).790/2010 Page 1 of 2 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified 2. Subsequently,the Plaintiff/Petitionerfiled an applicationunder Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC in Suit No.51/06/76 seeldng a review of the said order. This was dismissedby an order dated 12*^ May 2008 decliningto recallthe order dated 17^^November 2007. 3. Thereafter, an application was filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 seeking a review of the order dated 12^^ May 2008. The learned ADJ held that the Petitioner could not be permitted to reagitate the same matter which had been decidedby the predecessoron 12^^^ May 2008. No groundsfor review had been made out and the review petition was dismissed. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and having perused the order, this Court finds no ground having been made out for interference. 5. The petition is dismissed. JUNE 03, 2010 ps S. MURALIDHAR, J CM(M).790/2010 Page 2 of 2 z