1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.S. NO. 426/2010 IN Second Appeal NO. 149/2010 (Suryabhan Janba Chambhare & others VERSUS Sumitra Eknath Rode) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Neeta Jog, counsel for the petitioner. Shri K.R. Lule, counsel for the respondent. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : MAY 7, 2010 . Heard. It is stated by the learned counsel for the applicant that the value of the disputed land is not more than Rupees Four Lacs and in such circumstances, the applicants pray that they may be permitted to furnish solvent surety to the tune of Rupees Four Lacs only. It is also stated on behalf of the applicants that Tiroda is not a very big town and, therefore, it is not possible to furnish surety of Rupees Seven Lacs Fifty Thousand as the properties owned by the people are small and they do not fetch huge money. Shri Lule, the learned counsel for the respondent, opposes the prayer made in the civil application and states that only time may be extended for furnishing solvent surety. He is, however, unable to make the statement about the value of the suit property. 2 In the facts and circumstances of the case and after considering the documents annexed to the application, the prayer made in the civil application is granted and the applicants are permitted to give security to the tune of Rupees Four Lacs within a period of one month from the date of this order. The civil application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and disposed of. JUDGE APTE