RFA No. 59 of 1994 & CMP No. 1171 of 2008. 11.3.2010 Present: Pt. Om Prakash, counsel for the appellants. Mr. Ajay Kumar, counsel for respondent No. 1. Mr. Atul Jhingan, counsel for respondent No. 2. When this appeal was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the appellants pleaded that CMP No. 1171 of 2008 filed under the provisions of Order 41 Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure be taken on record. The prayer made in the application is for taking on record the compromise entered into between the bank and Shri B.L.Rana, with whom the bank has entered into compromise and a sum of Rs.1.50 lakh has been accepted from him in full and final settlement of his liability. The application alongwith the documents filed therewith are taken on record of the case. We do not intend to adjudicate on the executability of the decree. It will be open to the appellant herein to urge these facts and to establish that in law, no amount can be claimed after the compromise has been entered into by the bank. The factual and legal aspects shall be adjudicated by the executing Court without in -2- any manner being influenced by any observation made by us herein. We also find that no steps have been taken in accordance with law for representation of the estate of appellant No. 2 Surinder Singh. In these circumstances, we dismiss this appeal. There shall be no order as to costs. (Dev Darshan Sud), J. March 11, 2010 (PC). (Kuldip Singh), J.