HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6825 of 2007 Date: October 8, 2007 Between: Sabavat Rukman Naik. … Petitioner And 1. The Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Tank Bund, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Commissioner and 4 others. … Respondents * * * ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioner aggrieved by the inaction of the respondents in considering and disposing of the representation of the petitioner dated 23.11.2006 with reference to the alleged illegal constructions. 2. It is stated by the learned counsel that as per the Division Bench judgment of this Court and the G.O.Ms.No.565, dated 04.11.2006 the respondents, including Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, has to take appropriate action to see that no illegal constructions will be taken up by either owners of the vacant site or by encroachment. According to the petitioner, in spite of representation made on 23.11.2006 the respondents did not take any action, therefore, the present writ petition. 3. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Standing Counsel for the first respondent corporation, the writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 23.11.2006 and also take appropriate action if there are any illegal constructions that are being made as alleged by the petitioner within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. _____________________ (S.ANANDA REDDY, J) Date: October 8, 2007. BSB