IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5624 of 2009 SUKHDEO MANDAL @ SUKHDEO PRASAD MANDAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 22.5.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a police case under section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. The submission is that the allegation of assault is against co-accused Raj Kumar Mandal. The allegation is that Raj Kumar Mandal in a dispute with regard to the Jalkar had fabricated documents of the Jalkar prepared in the name of the petitioner and one Saligram Mandal. On that basis the petitioner is alleged to have been one of the conspirators in the crime. This Court is not persuaded to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail. The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail shall be considered on its own merit, without being prejudiced by the present order. (Navin Sinha,J.) A.Kumar