Crl. Misc. No.M-13919 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-13919 of 2009 Date of Decision: 10.05.2011 Pardeep Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- None for the petitioner. Mr. Sidharth Sarup, D.A.G., Haryana for the respondent-State. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C read with Article 21 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondents No.1 to 4 not to harass, humiliate, defame and liquidate the petitioner by showing a fake encounter by respondents No.2 to 5 at the instance of respondent No.6. Reply has been filed by the Director General of Police, Haryana, Panchkula dated 08.07.2009. As per the said reply, FIR No.207 dated 14.04.2009 under Sections 25/61/85 of the NDPS Act, Police Station Civil Lines, Hisar was got registered by the Deputy Superintendent, Central Jail, Hisar. According to FIR, some unsocial element has thrown 250 gms `Sulpha' and 2 mobile sets over Western side wall in the jail compound of Hisar on 14.04.2009. The contents of the FIR and the incident were found to be correct in the enquiry conducted by the Superintendent of Police, Crl. Misc. No.M-13919 of 2009 2 Hisar. Further, during the investigation, calls made from one of the mobile were analyzed. It was found in the analysis that a call was made from the mobile found in jail compound to one of the Pardeep Jamawari's mobile. Another call was also made on the mobile from another mobile of Jamawari. Pardeep Jamawari was arrested in the case on the basis of call analysis of mobile found in the jail compound of Hisar. The report of the Superintendent of Police concerned has been placed on record as Annexure R-1 showing the involvement of present petitioner. As per the status report dated 24.08.2009, the petitioner has been convicted in four cases and learned counsel for the respondent- State, on instructions from ASI Ram Singh, has further pointed out that 40 more cases are pending against him. Moreover, respondent No.4 has since been arrested and is in judicial custody. In view of the above, no further order is called for. However, the respondent-State shall ensure that no person including the police official will take the law into their own hands. Disposed of accordingly. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 10.05.2011 JUDGE gurpreet