IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.19533 of 2008 Between: M/s. Hotel Harsha, No.39, Public Garden road, Nampally, Hyd., rep. by its Managing Director Sri. Athaur Rahman Khan, S/o. Mohd. Khan, R/o. hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Labour Court, Hyderabad-I, rep. by its Presiding Officer Chandravihar building, 2nd Floor, M.J.Road, Hyderabad-1. 2 B.Govind, S/o. Budappa 3 G.Prasad S/o. Late Ramaiah 4 B.Narasimhloo S/o. B.Lalappa 5 Sardar Miya S/o. Late Bashu Miya 6 C.Chinnappa S/o. Late Narasaiah ( The Address of Respondents No.2 to 6 is C/o. C.Suryanarayana Rao, Advocate, 6-1-119/5, Padmaraonagar, Secunderabad. ) .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to call for the records from the 1st respondent and issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and quash the common Award passed by the 1st respondent in I.D.Nos. 44, 45, 52, 53 of 2006 and 59 of 2007, dated 18-4-2008, published on 8-8-2008, holding the same as illegal, unjust, contrary to law, perverse and without jurisdiction. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.K.JAYAPRAKASH RAO Counsel for Respondent No.1: GP FOR LABOUR Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 to 6: MR. C. SURYANARAYANA RAO The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.19533 OF 2008 Order: Learned counsel for the petitioner addressed a letter, dated 20-09-2008, to the Registry, seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition, stating that the respondents-workmen have approached the petitioner management individually and settled the matter by entering into Memorandums of Settlement under Section 18 (1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Copies of the said Memorandums of Settlement were ﬁled along with the letter. In view of the above, permission is accorded and the writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. _________​__________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 23rd September, 2008. IBL