IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9554 of 2010 RAJNI BHARTI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 23.11.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. It is submitted that aggrieved by the denial of appointment as Anganwari Sevika in preference to respondent no. 8 the petitioner has already preferred Case No. 3 of 2009- 2010 which is pending before the District Programme Officer. In view of the judgment of Division Bench of this Court the District Magistrate is the authority competent to decide such issue of appointment. This Court therefore directs that Case No. 3 of 2009-2010, if not already disposed, shall be transferred to the District Magistrate who shall then proceed to hear the petitioner and respondent no. 8 along with others concerned and disposed of the matter by a reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt and/or presentation of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)