IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25763 of 2010 ARUN KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Rs. 43,51,700/- was withdrawn from Account no. 1128 standing in the name of B.D.O. for which only it appeared that Rs. 1,50,000/- was withdrawn by Nazir by illegal means for which he was not authorized and other amount of Rs. 45,88,000/- which ought to be deposited in the account of B.D.O. but deposited in the account of one Pramod Singh and allowed to be withdrawn also. In the departmental inquiry by the Manager, liability was fixed upon this petitioner which he is denying that to save his own skin and other influential officers, petitioner has been made accused. There may be truth to some extent in the submission made by learned counsel and liability can be extended upon others also but not by exonerating this petitioner who is cashier of the Bank, played main role to deposit the aforesaid amount. From the rejection order of Sessions Judge it transpires that the petitioner could not succeed to point out any part of the investigation in 2 his favour exonerating him from the liability. Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner is rejected. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)