CW 9768/09 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9768/09 Bilal Bhisti Versus State & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 19/08/2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mrs. Gayatri Rathore, for petitioner *** Instant petition has been filed by petitioner with the grievance that he may be considered for grant of semi/permanent status U/r.3(3) & 3(2) of Workcharged Rules, 1964 on the post of Mason of which he is discharging duties from the date of his first appointment. From the material placed on record, it manifests that the petitioner was appointed as Beldar and declared semi permanent under R.3(3) of the Rules vide order Ann.12A dt.6th April, 1994 and so also granted benefit of permanent status under R.3(2) of the Rules vide order Ann.18 dt.25th March, 1998. He made number of representations but the order by which he was granted benefit of semi/permanent status as Beldar, has never been questioned earlier and almost after a decade, instant petition has been filed. CW 9768/09 [2] It is not the case of the petitioner that he was appointed as Mason and order of granting him benefit of semi/permanent status on the post of Helper is erroneous. On the contrary, submission is that he was appointed on the post of Beldar but as he is discharging duties of Mason, as such entitled for declaration of semi/permanent status under R.3(3) & 3(2) of Rules. In opinion of this court, if petitioner was appointed as Beldar, he is certainly entitled for declaration of semi/permanent status on the post he was appointed. If at all, he had worked for sometime as Mason that will not make him entitled for grant of semi/permanent status under Rules and accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed. Still if he has any grievance, he is free to avail remedy available under law. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA9768CW09 19-8.doc