IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.44635-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: OCTOBER 31, 2006 Harpreet Singh Multani and another ...PETITIONERS VERSUS Union Territory, Chandigarh and others ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. T.P.S.Tung, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Arvind Moudgill, Standing Counsel for U.T.Chandigarh. .. The petitioners apprehending their arrest in a non-bailable offence in case FIR No.220 dated 21.7.2006 registered under Sections 323/506/147/148/149 IPC at Police Station Sector 26, Chandigarh, have filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail. I have heard the counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the FIR. Counsel for the petitioners contends that in terms of the order dated September 25, 2006 the petitioners have joined the investigation. Counsel for the respondent-State does not dispute this fact and further states that the petitioners are no more required for further investigation. In view of the above, the interim order dated August 1, 2006 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions. This bail order shall remain in operation till the investigation culminates into filing of challan under Section 173 Cr.P.C. except for material change in the circumstances. Thereafter, the petitioners shall be entitled to the grant of regular bail by the trial Court and the same shall further continue till conclusion of the trial on the conditions to be imposed Crl.Misc.No.44635-M of 2006 -2- by the court of competent jurisdiction. Disposed of accordingly. October 31, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE