IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29710 of 2009 SAHDEO RAI Son of Sri Deo Raj Rai, Resident of Village- Pareyee, P.S.- Shikarganj, District- East Champaran --------------Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --------------Opposite Party ----------- 2. 19.8.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 363, 366A and 376 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter has been compromised between the parties. Under the circumstances, I am inclined to grant bail to the above named petitioner on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahna at Motihari in connection with Chiraiya P.S. Case No. 33/2009 (Tr. No. 3225/2009), subject to the conditions, (i) that the Magistrate will issue notice to the informant and verify from himself whether the compromise has actually been filed by him or not and in case the informant supports the factum of compromise (ii) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner (iii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail (iv) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the Court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his - 2 - release in the present case and thereafter the Court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse and (v) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police paper on the given date and will not delay the trial. P. Kumar (Anjana Prakash, J.)