1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.605 OF 2008 Anant Fakirchand Repote & Ors. .... Appellants Vs. Prakash Bhimaji Jadhav & Ors. .... Respondents Mr.R.S. Datar, Advocate for appellants. Mr.P.S. Dani, Advocate for respondents no. 1 and 2. Coram : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. Date : 2nd December, 2009 P.C. 1. The concurrent finding on the questions of fact and law by the Courts below are sought to be challenged by the present Second Appeal. The appellant, the original plaintiff is the owner of the land at gat No.473 situate at village Saykheda. Towards West side of the suit property, there is Sinnar-Saykheda road. Between the road and the appellant’s property is the land belonging to the Government. Respondents no.1 to 5 have constructions of tin sheds on the Government land in front of the appellant’s property on its Western side. It is claimed by the appellant that because of these constructions, his access to the suit property is closed. Therefore, he sought removal of the structures which according to him were put up by respondents no.1 to 5 in collusion with respondents no.6 and 7, Gram Panchayat and its Sarpanch. Both the Courts below have rightly held that the appellants admittedly have two more accesses to their property, one from the Northern side and 2 the other from the Eastern side of the suit land. Besides there is nothing to show that there existed a road over the government land connecting Sinnar-Saykheda road and the appellant’s property. In that circumstance, there cannot be any interference with the concurrent finding of the Courts below. There is no substantial question of law arising for consideration of the Court. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed. (SMT.R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J)