IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Appeal From Order No. 107 of 2008 Govind Prasad, S/o Shri Shiv Lal Arya R/o Village Narayankoti, Patwari Circle Guptakashi, Tehsil Ukhimath, District Rudraprayag ….Appellant Versus 1- Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., through its Divisional Manager, Railway Road, Jwalapur, Haridwar (insurer of Jeep No. UP-07/E-7166) 2- Chandi Prasad, s/o Late Ram Kishan Purohit, R/o Village Sandgu, Post Office Hadetikhal, Tehsil and District Rudraprayag (owner of Jeep No.UP-07/E-7166) 3- Jaspal Singh Panwar s/o Shri Gabar Singh, R/o Village Khumera, Post Office Devidhar, Tehsil Ukhimath, District Rudraprayag (owner of Motorcycle No. UA-13/0138) 4- National Insurance Co. Ltd. through its Divisional Manager, Ranipur Chowk, Haridwar (insurer of Motorcycle No. UA- 13/0138) …Respondents Sri R.P. Nautiyal, Advocate, for appellant. Sri D.K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent no. 1 Sri Deepak Rawat, Advocate, for respondent no. 4. Dated; March 26, 2008 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. This appeal, for enhancement of compensation, has been filed by the appellant- claimant against the judgment and award dated 24.9.2007, passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/District Judge, Rudraprayag, in MACT No. 16 of 2006, Govind Prasad vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. and others, whereby the Tribunal partly allowed the claim petition and awarded compensation of Rs. 28,487/- to the claimant. Heard leaned counsel for the parties and perused the record. Perusal of the impugned judgment and award shows that the claimant-appellant did not file disability certificate. He was granted pension on medical ground by Officer Commanding but no disability certificate issued from any doctor has been filed. The claimant filed medical bills for Rs. 23,487/- and the Tribunal awarded Rs. 5000/- for the claimant’s injuries and Rs.23,487/- towards medical expenses, total being Rs. 28,487/-. I do not find any infirmity in the above calculation of compensation. The impugned judgment and award passed by Tribunal does not require any interference by this Court. The appeal lacks merit and is accordingly dismissed in limine. (B. C. Kandpal, J.) SP