IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24288 of 2009 RAJ KUMAR YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.8.2009 Heard Sri Neeraj Kumar @ Sanidh, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. As may appear from the rejection order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge- VIIth, Patna in Sessions Trial No.869 of 2008 on 8.6.2009 the court had fixed time frame for itself for disposing of the trial finally and that time frame was August,2009. The learned counsel appearing for the informant disputed the contention of the learned senior counsel for the petitioner that not even a single witness has been produced or examined in the trial. That contention of the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner appears getting strength from the very report submitted by the learned trial Judge through his letter no.281 dated 20.8.2009 which appears on the record of connected petition bearing no.20138 of 2008 in which a separate direction has been issued to the petitioner for taking steps for filing fresh petition. - 2 - This court had directed the conclusion of the trial within a time frame of one year and that appears not being heeded to. The petitioner is in custody since 24.1.2006 in a case under Section 304B IPC with some specific defence as may appear in the previously passed rejection order. Let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional District Judge-VI, Patna, in S.Tr.No.869 of 2008 (Sahjahanpur P.S.Case No.17 of 2005). B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )