WP(C) 2835/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA. Heard Mr. M. K. Choudhury, learned senior counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. R. Mazumdar, learned counsel appearing for the Respondent No.4. I ha ve also heard Mr. S.Banik, learned Standing Counsel, Karbi Anglong Autonomous Co uncil. The petitioner is aggrieved by Annexure-3 order dated 27.5.2011, by whic h he was released from the disposal of K.A.A.C on the ground of his performance being not satisfactory. While entertaining the writ petition by order dated 6.6. 2011, the effect and operation of the said order was suspended. There are two parts of the said order dated 27.5.2011. The petitioner is basically aggrieved by the first part of the order. By the second part of the order, the Respondent No.4 was allowed to hold the charge of the post of the pet itioner, in addition to his normal duties. Mr. S. Banik, learned Standing Counsel, KAAC submits that the impugned order dat ed 27.5.2011 was passed without the required consultation with the State Governm ent. He submits that in the meantime, the consultation has taken place on 20.6.2 011. Be that as it may, if the required formalities were not carried out towards passing of the impugned order dated 27.5.2011, the same will have to go, subjec t, however, with liberty to the respondents to pass appropriate order in accorda nce with law, if so advised. In view of the above, the impugned order dated 27.5.2011, so far as it relates t o the petitioner, shall stand set aside and quashed. At the same time, the Resp ondent No.4 shall be allowed to continue in his normal duties i.e. Executive Eng ineer, Karbi Anglong Division, Diphu. Writ petition stands disposed of.