IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18469 of 2011 JALALUDDIN ANSARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 14.6.2011 Heard. The case relates to the death of a labourer, who was working with the petitioner in a school in connection with constructions. The petitioner is said to have asked the deceased Rinku to connect the electric line and in that course he received electric shock and died. What appears from the rejection order is that the case is not under section 302 IPC rather it may be a case under section 304(A) IPC. On bare perusal of the statements made in the fardbeyan, what appears is that there is complete lack of intent of causing the death of the deceased by doing any act. In fact, the petitioner was not doing anything, he was simply asking the deceased to connect the electric line being quite unaware of befalling an accused. It might be a case under section 304(A) IPC and, as such, the petitioner should surrender and pray for regular bail before the court below. The petition stands disposed of with the aforementioned observation/direction. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)