(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. Civil Application No. 745 of 2011 (In Writ Petition No. 5116 of 2009) Syed Mujiboddin s/o. Syed Ahmed .. Applicants Mohiuddin & another. (Respondent Nos.3 and 4 in WP) versus Yusufa Khatoon w/o. Mujiboddin and .. Non-applicants others. (Nos.1 to 7 - Petitioners in WP, Nos.8 & 9 - Respondent nos.1 & 2 in WP, and Nos.10 to 13 - Respondent Nos.5 to 8 in WP) ....................... Mr. H.H. Padalkar, Advocate, holding for Mr. Rajendra Deshmukh, Advocate, for the applicants. Mr. N.K. Tungar, Advocate, holding for Mr. A.S. Gandhi, Advocate, for non-applicant nos.1 to 7. Mr. R.R. Shaikh, Advocate, for non-applicant nos.8 and 9. Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for non-applicant nos.10 to 13. ........................ (2) CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 17TH FEBRUARY 2011 COURT'S ORDER : 1. Heard learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. Adv. Mr. Tungar, appearing for non-applicant nos.1 to 7 (writ petitioners), is seeking time to place copy of reply on record. Adv. Mr. Padalkar, appearing for the applicants (respondent nos.3 and 4 in WP), states that he has already received copy of reply. 3. During the course of hearing, Adv. Padalkar has pointed out that it is necessary to restrain the writ petitioners from creating third party interest in the suit land. 4. Thus, interim relief already granted is not sought to be vacated but the applicants (respondent nos.3 and 4 in WP) want writ petitioners to maintain status quo in relation to the property in dispute. 5. In the circumstances, the application is disposed of by (3) directing non-applicant nos.1 to 7 (writ petitioners) not to create third party interest in the suit land during the pendency of the petition. ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/ca745