IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15173 of 2009 RAVI KUMAR @ TINKU Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 01.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that in the case a cheque is bounced though not issued by the petitioner. A simple case under Section 138 of N.I. Act is made out which is bailable one, though applicable against his father only. There could be no occasion to come to the petitioner’s shop for hearing abuse that also is the shop cannot be denied as public view. In a legal notice, only father was alleged for the abuse, while in the complaint petition that allegation has also been levelled against this petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with S.C./S.T. P.S. Case No. 63 of 2008, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sessions Judge, Munger subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)