1 MCA-40-10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 40 OF 2010 Sonali Sunil Kangane ... Applicant Vs. Sunil Sakharam Kangane ... Respondent Mr. A.M.Kulkarni,Advocate, for the applicant. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 21st September, 2010. P.C. 1. Inspite of service of notice, none appears for the respondent. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant. 2. The applicant is wife of the respondent. They were married on 2.5.2007. However, shortly their relations got strained and they began to live separately. The respondent/husband filed Marriage Petition No.A-462/2009 before the Family Court, Mumbai at Bandra, on 13.2.2009 for restitution of conjugal rights, while the wife filed HMP No.195/2009 before the Civil Judge, S.D., Sangli, for divorce on 4.8.2009. The wife wants the petition filed by the husband to be transferred from Mumbai to Sangli on the ground that she comes from a very poor family and she cannot afford to travel from Sangli to Mumbai. She has also no place to stay at Mumbai. She is a young woman aged 24 years. The husband 2 MCA-40-10.sxw is working with Tata Indicom and his salary is Rs.12,000/- per month and his father is also running a Kirana shop. 3. Taking into consideration the difficulties shown by the applicant, in the interest of justice, the Petition No.A-462/2009 is hereby withdrawn from the Family Court Mumbai at Bandra and stands transferred to the file of Civil Judge, S.D., Sangli for hearing and disposal along with HMP No.195/2009. The trial Court shall not insist for the presence of the respondent-husband, unless it is absolutely necessary for progress of the matter. Application stands disposed of. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)