IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10602 of 2011 RAM SUSHILA YADAV, S/o Lok Dhopa Yadav. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 04.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 504 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 Arms Act. The petitioner was refused bail by order dated 08.10.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No. 34134 of 2010 on the ground that he had allegedly committed this occurrence after his conviction. It has been submitted that in fact the petitioner had been released on probation of Offenders Act in the year 1989 and the present occurrence is of the year 2010. The further submission is that this occurrence has taken place on account of land dispute and there is a general allegation of firing but no one was hurt in the transaction. The next submission is that he is in custody since 25.07.2010. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-III, Buxar in connection with S.Tr. 2 No. 325 of 2010 arising out of Simri P.S. Case No. 135 of 2010 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)