IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.4533 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision 22.12.2009 Suresh Kohli ...... Petitioner VERSUS Sonika Kohli ...... Respondent C.R.No.5366 of 2009(O&M) Date of Decision 22.12.2009 Sonika Kohli ...... Petitioner VERSUS Suresh Kohli ...... Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Sukhwinder Pal Singh, Advocate, for Mr.Amit Rawal, Advocate, for Mr.Suresh Kohli. Ms.Sonal Dutta, Advocate, for Mr.Vikas Mohan Gupta, Advocate, for Ms.Sonika Kohli. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J(ORAL): Written request for adjournment, filed by learned counsel for the Suresh Kohli, stands declined. The aforesaid two revision petition Nos.4533 of 2008 and 5366 of 2009, one preferred by Suresh Kohli for decreasing the maintenance and other preferred by the Ms.Sonika Kohli for enhancing the same, having arisen out of the order dated 25.07.2008, passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana, are being disposed of by a common judgment. As regards the petition preferred by Suresh Kohli, having perused the impugned order, a sum of Rs.1500/- was awarded to Sonika Kohli, keeping in view her own income whereas Viren Kohli was awarded only a sum of Rs.1,000/- per month. Even if the aforesaid amount of Rs.2500/- had been awarded for Viren Kohli then it would not have been on the higher side. With regard to the petition preferred by Sonika Kohli for enhancement of maintenance, since it is proved that Sonika Kohli is earning hand, as such, no grounds for enhancement are made out. Finding no grounds to interfere, both the petitions are dismissed. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 22.12.2009 mamta-II