IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 21492 of 2005 Between: 1 P. Seshareddy S/o. Narasareddy R/o. Madhavaram, Ontimitta Mandal, Cuddapah District, 2 Y. Subba Reddy S/o. Narasareddy R/o. Madhavaram, Ontimitta Mandal, Cuddapah District, 3 Yerribabu Subba Reddy S/o. Late Rama Krishna Reddy R/o. Madhavaram, Ontimitta Mandal, Cuddapah District, ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Irrigation and Command Area Development Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, 2 The Chief Engineer, Telugu Ganga Project, Srikalahasthi, Chittoor District. 3 The Superintending Engineer, Telugu Ganga Project, (TGP Circle) Kadapa 4 The Special Deputy Collector (LAO) Somasila Project, Unit IV, Rajampet, Kadapa District, .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.R.N.HEMENDRANATH REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is prayed that this Honourable Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not paying the decretal amount in LAOP No. 25/1995 dated 20-4-1998 to the petitioners as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to deposit the decretal amount as per decree in LAOP No. 25/1995 dt. 20-4-1998 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Rajampet forthwith without any further delay.” At the hearing, Sri R.N.Hemendranath Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP No.27544 of 2005 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is also dismissed as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Dated 2nd July, 2008 vrn