IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 1186 of 2007 (M/B) M.C. Joshi …… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ..…. Respondents Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Government Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent No.3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Government Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent No.3. 2. Delay Condonation Application No.5962 of 2008 is allowed. Counter affidavit be taken on record. 3. Shri B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioner has now become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case submitted a final report dated 12/06/2008 against the petitioner before the Circle Officer concerned on 20/06/2008 & the Investigating Officer had not found prima facie case against the petitioner and is likely to submit a final report before the court concerned in the near future. 4. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 5. Interim order dated 17.11.2007 shall remain operative till the submission of the final report before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 12.09.2008 Shiv