IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No. 4087 of 2009 Date of decision: 21st November, 2011 Ranbir Singh and another .......Appellants Versus Bhim Singh ........Respondent BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJENDER SINGH MALIK Present: Mr. Naveen Singh Panwar, Advocate for the appellants. Vijender Singh Malik, J. Learned counsel for the appellants wishes to withdraw the present appeal, claiming that the same had been filed against a person who was not proved to be the owner of the vehicle. According to him, claim under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 was not maintainable against the driver and the same was dismissed. It is further submitted that now the claimants/appellants have come to know about the name of the owner of the vehicle and they would be in a position to file claim petition against the owner of the vehicle. Besides withdrawal of the appeal, learned counsel seeks permission to file a fresh claim petition against the owner and insurer. In view of the circumstances coming on the record, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforestated liberty. [VIJENDER SINGH MALIK] JUDGE 21st November, 2011 Shivani Kaushik