IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 1264 of 1997 Between: 1 A.Srinivasa Reddy, S/o. Pitchi Reddy, R/o. Guntur. 2 M.Gurvaiah, S/o. Bala Guravaiah, R/o. Guntur. 3 P.Shivaiah, S/o. Rattaiah, R/o. Guntur. 4 M.Veeranjaneyulu, S/o. Venkanna, R/o. Guntur. 5 D.Ravindra Rao, S/o. Yellamanda, R/o. Guntur. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Commissioner of Labour and Chief Inspector under Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1988, Hyderabad-20. 2 The Assistant Commissioner of Labour-II, Guntur. 3 The Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 4 The Chairperson, the Guntur Co-operative House Constuction Society Limited, S.V.N. Colony, Guntur. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings No.II/22920/96 dated 28-11-1996 issued by the Commissioner of Labour and Chief Inspector under A.P.Shops and Establishments Act, 1988 as illegal and quash the same; and also direct the respondents to dispose of teh appeals under the Shops & Establishments Act within a period of three months and pass Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.M.PANDURANGA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI W.P.NO.1264 OF 1997 ORAL ORDER It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. --------------- G.ROHINI,J 9th APRIL 2009 *TSNR