Sin8te .t-^ v ^ u 3 SN THE HISH COURTOF 3UDICATU%E AT BILASPUR WITPETSTION N0. 2^fc3 OF200S pBrmowiR; ^. Bansidhar Sadangi, aged about 80 years, son of Late Neelkanth Sadangi, occupation^-cultivation, resident of - Gourishankar Mandir Road, village Kauhakunda, Tahsil & District - Rai'garh (Chhattisgarh) Versus - State of Chhattjsgarh, thrQugh ; the Secretary, Department of Revenue.-D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) The Collector, Raigarh - Cum _ Ex-Offlcio, Secretary of Goyemment of Chhattisgarh, Department of Revenue, Post Offlce and Tahsil - Raigarh (Chhattisgattii The Executive Engineer, Chhattisgarti ' Grih Wirroan Mandat, Pariyojna Sambhaa, Raigarh (Chhattfegarh): s | 'K'isSSSSS SBMX18S18 .•^A'^^iS^ STSTION UNOER ARTIGLES226^27 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF JNBIA " ~* HC-22 n^rqii Nail^T WHfBT 3%T '<II<<K"I<I, aTilo'is, Reiioy 81 sn^i LJL) ii*fni axtif) yrqsrai _ . ^, /^ :p:^o. <2.b'^/05 W( 200 R<>'A'""""""""*"'" 3<i^i e'wiiot tflea Shri Amrito Das, tearn^ Shri Sanjay S. Agrav»'a| 2/State. Shri Sanjay Patel, cou i-ieard. chfal issu^d Coilector, Raigarh, pertaining to !and acquisition with Section 4 (i) ofthe Lana^ said notification . has been notification has not been issu^c the Act and the acquisitlon| provisions of Chhattisgarh Gri| On perusai of the saijJ 'eauirements ofSection 4 oftf objections in accordance withl has fi'ed his objections before) hearing and dlsposal, but w( petltioner has rushed up'askiiti Constitution of tndia. !n mv opinion when acquisition of land, petitione| forum and thereafter only, if sourts. With the aforesaid obst w<il<'i<(li •<i*(iiTffteT^t'<Rit<i< ^?9^ff3n^T d counsel for the petitioner. Govt. Advocste for ttie respondents No. 1 and isel for respondent No.3. teued public notification dated 10/12'2Q04 •sase No.OI/A-82 year 2004-2005 in aocordance ^cquisition Act, 1894 (henceforth, "ths Act"). The llenged by the petitioner on the ground that fhe in accordance with requirement ofSectlon 4 of prooeeding is void being in vjolation pf the Nirman Mandal Adhiniyam, 1972. J notifioation, it is manifest that it fulfiils a!l the le Act. Petitioner, if interested, has right to make Section 5-A of the Act. Admittedly, petitioner the competent authority whjch are pending for Shout waiting for ths result of his objections, ig this Court to step in under Articie 226 ofthe there is specific provision in connection with must exhaust his remedy before appropriate ixigency, arises should approach constitutional n/ation, the writ petition is disposed V.K.Shrivastava ;aas,i • ^i^l MBBaai