IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 24TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 28359 of 2010(T) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- BRIJESH A.S., AGED 30 YEARS, ANAPPARA HOUSE, NOCHIPPULLY P.O., MUNDUR VIA., PALAKKAD-678 592. BY ADVS. SRI.C.ARUN PRASANTH SRI.ANOOP MATHEW ABRAHAM SMT.ROOPA RAMACHANDRAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA P.O., KOTTAYAM, REP. BY THE REGISTRAR. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA P.O., KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.SHAJI, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 28359 of 2010 T ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 15th day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T In this writ petition, the main grievance of the petitioner is that the special examination for LLM, scheduled as per Ext.P4, is on 16th and 17th of September, 2010 and that the petitioner was given only very short time to appear for the same. 2. Although Standing Counsel for the respondent University has obtained instructions and made his submissions, I am inclined to think that there is substance in what the petitioner contends. In that view of the matter, I feel it is only appropriate that the petitioner should be given sufficient time to prepare for the examination and that the exam should be rescheduled. 3. Therefore, it is clarified that if the petitioner is not ready for the examination as scheduled as per Ext.P4, it will be open to the petitioner not to appear in the examination and to indicate to the University any convenient date and time and thereupon, the University will schedule another special examination for the WPC.28359/2010 : 2 : petitioner, on a date suitable to the University and the petitioner. Needless to say that, as provided in the regulations, it will also be open to the petitioner to choose better marks of the two examinations. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks