IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 24TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 5TH PHALGUNA 1930 Crl.MC.No. 749 of 2009() ----------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED / / IN CC.1092/02-LPR.96/06 IN CC.112/2009 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT, KODUNGALLUR .................... PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED ---------------------- SHEELA, D/O.PADMAVATHY AMMAL CHAKKALAKKAL, PERINNANAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS.MR.P.VINODKUMAR MR.SUSHANTH.J. RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. SASIDHARAN, S/O.RAMANADHA PRABHU, SWARGATHU MADOM, METHALA. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR.P.A.SALIM THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N. KRISHNAN, J ----------------------- CRL.M.C.No. 749 OF 2009 --------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of February, 2009 O R D E R This petition is filed to direct Judicial First Class Magistrate Court -I, Kodungallore to consider and pass orders on Annexure- B petition. I have perused the memorandum of this petition and in page 3 reference is made to this Annexure B petition and immediately the petitioner himself has stated “However the court below rejected the said petition without passing any orders on it.” Rejection of a petition itself is an order and if a person is aggrieved, there are provisions which enables him to challenge that order. So with liberty to do so, the Crl.M.C is dismissed. M.N. KRISHNAN,JUDGE vkm