IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2787 of 2004. Roop Chand @ Roopa son of Shri Sahara Ram VERSUS Narad Lal son of Shri Chadru Ram & Others. Date Of Order ::: 18/03/2008. Hon'ble Mr. Narendra Kumar Jain J. Mr. Rajnish Gupta, Counsel for the Petitioner Mr. Amit Gupta, advocate, for Mr. B.L. Agarwal ) Mr. Rinesh Gupta ) Mr. S.P. Poshwal, Counsel for the respondents By the Court : Heard learned counsel for the parties. The plaintiff/respondents filed a suit for permanent injunction in respect of disputed property, along with the application for temporary injunction, which was dismissed by the trial Court, but on an appeal the appellate Court set aside the order passed by the trial Court and passed an order of status-quo in respect of the disputed property, while allowing the appeal of the plaintiff. Hence, this writ petition has been preferred on behalf of the defendant/petitioner challenging the impugned order of the appellate Court. Learned counsel for both the parties contended that the appellate Court has already passed an order of status-quo in respect of disputed property during the pendency of the suit, therefore, this writ petition may be disposed of. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties. I do not find any error in the order passed by the appellate Court, which is just and reasonable in the facts and circumstances of the present case. In view of above, I do not find any merit in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. ashok/