IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.80 OF 2006 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.133 OF 2004 Abid Kurbanhussain Daruwalla ...Applicant Versus Patil Store Crusher & Co. & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Saheb Deshmukh i/b Mr.Uday Warunjikar for Applicant. None for Respondents. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. JULY 19, 2006. JULY 19, 2006. JULY 19, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Explanation offered in the Application is unacceptable. However, as the litigant should not suffer for the mistake of the Advocate, Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), on condition that the Advocate on record for the Applicant shall personally pay cost quantified at Rs.1,500/- (Rupees One Thousand Five Hundred) to the High Court Legal Services Committee within one : 2 : week from today, failing which, Office to treat this Application as having been dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the Court. 2. If steps are taken in time, main matter be restored and processed further as per its turn under appropriate caption. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.