:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1388 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.1388 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.1388 OF 2007 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.512 OF 2007 APPEAL NO.512 OF 2007 APPEAL NO.512 OF 2007 Rajendra Madhukar Kadam ..Applicant/ Appellant V/s State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr. A.P. Mundargi, Sr.Advocate for the applicant-appellant. Mr.V.B. Konde Deshmukh, APP for the respondent CORAM CORAM CORAM : SRI R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR AND : SRI R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR AND : SRI R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR AND SRI SRI SRI A.A. SAYED, JJ. A.A. SAYED, JJ. A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 29TH FEBRUARY, 2008 : 29TH FEBRUARY, 2008 : 29TH FEBRUARY, 2008 P.C. 1. Heard. The appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under section 302 of Indian Penal Code. The trial Court after detailed analysis of the evidence has arrived at the finding about the involvement of the appellant in setting his wife ablaze and a finding appears to be corroborated by the eye witnesses, who rushed to the site immediately after seeing the smoke coming out from the house. Prima facie therefore, there is sufficient evidence to establish the involvement of the accused. There :2: is also dying declaration by the deceased directly implicating the accused. Undisputedly, during the trial the appellant was not able to secure the bail. In the circumstances, we do not find the case made out for grant of bail at this stage. The application is rejected. (R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J) (R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J) (R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J) ( A.A. SAYED, J.) A.A. SAYED, J.) A.A. SAYED, J.)