IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD FEBRUARY 2010 / 14TH MAGHA 1931 Crl.MC.No. 380 of 2010() ------------------------ MC.243/2007 of ASSISTANT SESSIONS COURT, THRISSUR .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.C.PETER, S/O.CHAKKAPPAN, AGED 58, RESIDING AT KANJIRATHUNGAL, THEKKE ANGADI, KUNNAMKULAM, THALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN SRI.R.SURAJ KUMAR SMT.GEETHA P.MENON SRI.P.M.NEELAKANDAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, (ACTING ALSO AS THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE), OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR. 3. CHACKO CHERUVATHUR, THEKKE ANGADI, KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 4. JOSEPH, S/O.ANTONY, MISSION ANGADI, KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 5. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER, THRISSUR. PP MR.S U NAZAR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.02.2010 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.BHAVADASAN, J. ------------------------------------- Cr. MC No.380 of 2010 ------------------------------------- Dated 3rd February 2010 Order The prayer made by the petitioner in this petition is for a direction to the second respondent to dispose of Annexure-E petition before starting of evidence in the case on 05.02.2010. Cr.MC No.243/07 was instituted by the third respondent against the petitioner under S.133 Cr.PC and this Court is given to understand that the petitioner has filed his objections in the said petition. He, thereafter, filed Annexure-E petition to call for certain documents, which according to him, is to substantiate his contentions. 2. The grievance now raised by the petitioner is that without passing orders on that petition, the second respondent is proceeding with the trial, which will adversely affect him. Therefore, he prays for a direction to the second respondent to consider and pass orders on Annexure E petition before the commencement of evidence in the above said case. 3. The prayer made by the petitioner is just and reasonable. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of directing the CRMC 380/10 2 second respondent to consider and pass orders on Annexure-E petition in accordance with law before starting the evidence in Cr.MC No.243/07. P.BHAVADASAN, JUDGE sta CRMC 380/10 3