1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3124 OF 2009. Krushak Samaj Seva Samiti & another .vs. State of Maharashtra & others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mrs. M.M. Shesh, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. D.M. Kale, A.G.P. for respondent no. 1, Mr. R.E. Moharir, Advocate for respondent nos. 4 to 6. CORAM : S.A. BOBDE & S.B. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATED : MARCH 29, 2011. It is not disputed that the water supply has been restored to the petitioners by the MSEDCL. Mr. R.E. Moharir, learned Advocate for respondent nos. 4 to 6, states that there is no proposal to discontinue the water supply and further states that if the petitioners have any grievance in future, they may approach the authority who will redress their grievance. His statement is accepted. Mrs. M.M. Shesh, learned Advocate for petitioners, however, states that the petitioners are entitled to damages for the loss caused to the agriculturists for the discontinuation of water supply for a period of 3 to 4 years. For this, the petitioners are at liberty to seek redress in a Civil Court. In 2 the circumstances and at this stage, there is no reason to entertain this petition. Mrs. M.M. Shesh, learned Advocate for petitioners, seeks leave to withdraw the petition. The petition is allowed to be withdrawn. Judge Judge. J.