IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.2046 of 1993 Date of Decision:- 01.05.2008 M/s Punjab Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd., Bathinda & others ....Petitioner(s) through Mr.B.R.Gupta, Advocate. vs. State Bank of Patiala ....Respondent(s) through Mr.Nitin Jain, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr.C.B.Goel, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. *** 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? *** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 8.5.1993 whereby leave to defend was granted to the defendants subject to their furnishing security to the tune of amount mentioned in the order itself. Aggrieved at the imposition of the condition regarding furnishing of security, the defendants approached this Court by way of this revision petition in which while issuing notice of motion, it was directed that “condition with regard to furnishing of security is stayed.” As is revealed from the impugned order itself, the civil suit was filed in the year 1986 which by now, might have been decided on merits as none of the petitioners have contacted their learned counsel despite communication. C.R. No.2046 of 1993 -2- For the reasons aforestated, this revision petition is dismissed as having become infructuous, however, with liberty to the petitioners to get it revived within a period of three months. May 01, 2008 ( SURYA KANT ) poonam JUDGE