((-1-)) mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.90 OF 2004 Dnyanu Pandurang Katkar Applicant versus Jagannath Atmaram Ghadge and others Respondents Dilip Bodke for applicant. Ms.A.T.Javeri, APP for the State. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 06th April 2009 PC : 1. Heard learned advocate for the applicant. The applicant is the original complainant at whose instance the State prosecuted the respondents-accused for the offence punishable under sections 306 and 498-A read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. By the impugned order, the second respondent has been acquitted. 2. It must be noted here that the State of Maharashtra preferred Criminal Appeal No.1030 of 2004 for challenging the said impugned order. By the judgement and order dated 29th ((-2-)) November 2007 this Court has dismissed the said appeal against acquittal preferred by the State on merits. Hence, in this revision application filed at the instance of original complainant, no interference can be made with the impugned order. The revision application is rejected. (A.S.OKA, J.)