1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3746 of 2010 ( Amit Sushilkumar Porwal and Ors. vs. Smt. Anagha Arun Mhaisalkar) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr.Shantanu Khedkar, Adv. for petitioners. Mr.R.D.Bhuibhar, Adv. for respondent. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : AUGUST 09, 2010. Heard Mr.Shantanu Khedkar, Adv. for petitioners and Mr.R.D.Bhuibhar, Adv. for respondent. Both of the learned Counsel agree that the petitioners should be permitted to carry out proposed amendment by 13.8.2010 before the Competent Authority and therefore, the matter should be heard by the competent Authority. Mr.Shantanu Khedkar, Adv. for the petitioners states that he has instructions to agree to this arrangement. Accordingly, the petitioners shall carry out necessary amendment by 13.8.2010 and both the parties shall then address the Court finally in the matter. The competent Authority shall look into the spirit of Section 43 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 and shall pass final order by 30.8.2010. With these directions and liberty, the petition is disposed of. JUDGE jais