/ TI’ HIGH CQJRT OP xAm*flxa AT HANG LORE D4TED THIS THE 30TH DW O J’Th’E 1998 C THWWON’HTENq, 3STTCEH,t.DA’TTJ r M.’c channabasappa, Sb, “an3undappgowda, aged about 42 Lecturer in History, Sri Siddevruieshwara Composite Pro Ttniversity College, Jade, Shorab Taluk, Shimoga District, : PflTTIONER (M/s.Vgdevi Associates for Petitioner) ( a 1, The State of T Csrna t aka represented by its Secretary, Education Departuent, M,S,Huildings, Henpalore—1, 2, The Deputy Director of Public T nstructions, Shimoga Dist, Shirnoga, •, a e2a 3. Th• Ccaissiooer for Public ‘nstructlons in tarnataka, ¶.ltCird. Bangaioie_i. 4. The Principal, Sri Siddavrulheswan Composite Prs.fl1versitv Cot leg., lade, Shorab Taluk, Shiaoga District 5, The Director of Pre-tiversity Sduoation Board, Bangatore..560 001. (Petition dismissed as against b4 & 5 V.C.0.Dt.2i.3.W) (Sri.$Jdayashenkar, 40*, for hi to R.3) *fl* This Writ Petition nt-i under rtides 226 & 227 of the Constittion of India with an affliavit praying to quash the in puened eder it.28.9,94 wide Annex..D issuel by L2 aM etc., This Writ Petition ming cc for hearing this ‘ar, the Court aa 4 e the fill owing: . .. .3 -.3— 0 RDR Petitioner in this Writ Petition is staff working in aided private educational institutions. 4Q is before this Court interalia seeking directions to the respondents to accord certain service benefits including monetary benefits. In my view, these reliefs cannot be granted by this Court in veiw of the observations made by a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.Nos. 1833 to 1836/1995 disposed off on 30.5.1998. This Court while considering the issue whether the staff (Teaching and non—teaching)- working in educational institutions run by private management can maintain Writ Petitions to claim financial aid from the State Goverrimentin the absence of Master and Servant relation and other incidental issues, was pleased to observe that the writ petitions filed by teaching and non— teaching staff of private educational institutions are not -4- are not maintainable before this Court, Respectfully following the çbservations made in the aforesaid decision, this petition is disposed off as not maintainable before this Court for the reliefs sought therein. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approach the proper forum as suggested by this Court in the aforesaid decision. Ordered accordingly. sd/-JuoG. r. by; / / High Q,urt of Karnataka / Bngaiore_56O OO• iL\\