IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6891 of 2010 1. Manav Vikash Mahila Kalyan Sansthan, Through Its Secretary Bateshwar Sharma S/O Late Ram Baleshwar Sharma Having Its Head Office No.1102, Udaigiri Apartment,Budh Marg,Patna-1.P.S.- Kotwali,District-Patna. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The Bihar Education Project Council, Through Its Director, Bihar Education Project Council Beltron Bhawan Shastri Nagar,Patna-23. 3. The Director,Bihar Education Project Council, Beltron Bhawan Shastri Nagar,Patna-23. 4. The District Magistrate Cum Chairman,Bihar,Education Project Aurangabad. 5. The Sub Divisional Officer,Daudnagar, District-Aurangabad. 6. The District Superintendent Of Education Cum District Project Co-Ordinator,Bihar Education Project. 7. The Block Development Officer,Goh Block Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad. Null Null 8. The Block Education Extension Officer,Goh Block,District- Aurangabad. 9. The Head Master,Middle School, Block Colony Goh,District- Aurangabad. ----------- 3. 20.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and for the Bihar Education Project Council. Under an agreement dated 9.9.2006 the petitioner as a voluntary agency has been granted permission to run the Kasturba Gandhi Bilika Avasiya Vidyalaya, Goh at Aurangabad. On allegations of certain irregularities the District Superintendent of Education issued a show cause notice on 19.9.2009. A enquiry was held through the Block Development Extension Officer leading to orders on 3.11.2009 by the District Superintendent of Education-cum-District 2 Coordinator Bihar Education Project to hand over the entire records and functioning of the school to Principal Middle School, Block-Colony Goh. It is submitted that the petitioner represented before he State Project Director of the Bihar Education Project Council who then ordered on 10.11.2009 an enquiry in the matter and further directed that in the meantime the petitioner shall continue to operate under the agreement till such time that the enquiry was not concluded. No counter affidavit has been filed by the State or the Council. The parties have not placed any material before the Court with regard to what may or may have not transpired after 10.11.2009 much less the result of any enquiry. To pass any orders of a presumptive nature at this stage either in favour of the petitioner or against the petitioner shall be wholly inappropriate. If the relationship is contractual between the petitioner and the Bihar Education Project, the power of the Court to interfere with the contractual relationship as matters appear at this stage shall be premature. Once an enquiry has been ordered and the 3 requirement for fairness and reasonableness stands fulfilled the rest remains within the contractual domain of the Bihar Education Project Council to be exercised in accordance with law. Keeping in mind the occupants of the school are young girls, the Court expects that if the enquiry has not been concluded it shall be so done within a maximum period of one month and appropriate orders passed from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. In so far as the allegations of the administrative issue for the State authorities not complying with the interim directions contained in the order of the Project Director, Bihar Education Project Council dated 10.11.2009 is concerned, the matter is referred to the Chief Secretary of the State of Bihar. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)