IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 14TH JULY 2009 / 23RD ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 19587 of 2009(P) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- RAMA VARMA CLUB, CLUB ROAD, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY M.MUKUNDAN, S/O.LATE T.SIVASANKARA MENON. BY MR.T.KRISHNAN UNNI, SENIOR ADVOCATE, ADV. MR.R.RAMADAS. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, KANAYANNOOR TALUK, ERNAKULAM. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.R. DEEPA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/07/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No.19587 of 2009-P = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 14th day of July, 2009. JUDGMENT The petitioner challenges Ext.P1 notice issued under the Land Conservancy Act. The said statute provides a multi-level decision making process, including statutory appeals, revisions etc. It is unnecessary for this Court to interfere with that notice. However, having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances, there is no reason why the petitioner shall not have at least a month's time to file detailed objections to Ext.P1 notice after perusing the relevant documents. Accordingly, it is ordered that the time granted for placing objections to Ext.P1 notice will be one month from today. It is further clarified that the petitioner will be heard in relation to WP(C)19587/09 -: 2 :- any further action on the basis of the impugned Ext.P1 notice. All other issues are left open. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/160709