IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P. No.1476 of 2005 Date of Decision:- 14.1.2008 Pawan Kumar Gupta ....Petitioner(s) through Mr.G.P.S.Bal, Advocate. vs. Balbir Kaur and others ....Respondent(s) through Mr.M.L.Saggar, Sr.Advocate with Mr.G.P.Vashisth, Advocate. *** CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. *** 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? *** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) Heard learned counsel for the parties for some time. Learned counsel for the respondents states that without going into the question as to whether, prima facie, case of initiation of contempt proceedings is made out or not, the respondents are ready and willing to continue with the same arrangement as was made by this Court vide order dated August 23, 1996 in the pending civil suit. In other words, the respondents are willing to deposit a sum of Rs.2,000/- per month for the use and occupation of the subject premises with effect from 15.11.1999. Let the needful be done within four months from today. However, the aforesaid amount shall be deposited by the respondents on the same terms and conditions as contained in the order dated August 23, 1996 passed by this Court. In view of the above-stated fair stand taken by learned counsel for the respondents, no further action is required to be taken in these proceedings. Disposed of. Rule discharged. January 14, 2008 ( SURYA KANT ) poonam JUDGE