THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No :2476 of 2008 DATED:08-02-2008 BETWEEN: Pailla Manemma. ..... PETITIONER AND The Tahsildar, Ramannapet mandal, Nalgonda District. .....RESPONDENT ORDER: Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondent. 2. Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not considering the representations of the petitioner, dated 08-06-2007, and 31-12-2007, as illegal and arbitrary 3. It is the case of the petitioner that she is the owner and possessor of an extent of Ac.10.00 in Sy.No.129, 130 situated at Dubbaka village, Ramannapet mandal, Nalgonda District. It is stated that the said property originally belongs to the husband of the petitioner-Narsireddy and after his death petitioner succeeded the same. Petitioner applied for mutation in 2002 and the name of the petitioner was mutated by the respondent-Mandal Revenue Officer, Ramannapet and pattadar passbook No.809 was also issued in her favour in respect of the said land. It is further stated that out of the said extent, petitioner gifted Ac.2.00 each to her three daughters vide gift deed, dated 19-06-2007, and she retained the remaining Ac.4.00 of the land. While so, petitioner received a notice C/790/06, dated 15-05-2007, alleging that one Devarapalli Rajalinga Reddy filed a petition before the respondent for regularization of the documents under Section 5-A of the Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act and pursuant to the said notice petitioner made a representation/objection on 08-06-2007 before the respondent stating that Devarapalli Biksham Reddy, S/o Rajalinga Reddy has no right over the said property and the said land cannot be transferred. 4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, and as the enquiry is pending in Ref.No.C/790/06, dated 15-05-2005, on the file of the respondent, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case respondent is directed to consider the representation/objection of the petitioner, dated 08-06-2007, and dispose of the same after giving reasonable opportunity to the petitioner as well as the said Devarapalli Biksham Reddy, S/o Raja Lingareddy. 5. Accordingly, Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J 08th February, 2008. Tsy