'^ V £,<T' |oo( IN THE HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0.2-2-340F 2006 PETITIONER .A .••'<M>* . ^y/ .^y/ ^y^y z^>" ./A?^y <£»• <^'. ^isPONDENTS ^,r<\.c?!2 6 ^r^"^^ / LA*<- M. L. Dubey, S/o Shri Ram Ratan Dubey, aged about 60 years,0ccupation - Service, posted as Deputy Director, Department of Panchayat & Social Welfare, Raigarh, (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS / 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Department of Mahila Avam Bal Vikas Tatha, Panchayat & Samaj Kalyan Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan,Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. Sanchalak, Panchayat Avam ^Samaj Sewa, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ,3. Collector, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MIANDAMUS, PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS: c?/c- XI-HC-78 aTi^TwR-fi'ti (T8TT3<l^lsbMi+, *ii*iwi awTiti 3?? -^Hld^, atflwis, fictiuy KP..ZJr7?.^?fc.: ^ 200 3<l^!fl 4d«h('i^lS.'T) ?RIIWB1^(T3(1^1 12.S.2006 Shri Monindr'a Shrivastav' AdvocQte for the petitioner. Snfj Se+ish Kumar &upta. C On the last date of hea K^scl^wc^is. ^oys?f!flswsi"i* rA^vo'cs^^ "espondenTs and soughT Three w eiap.se of three weeks' no reply ha Learned Sr. ndvoeate for rroffl the documents attoched ^£&oip.ts<i as tsctchsr' s,fld jt is sl^ To time by the respondent cuth ttoreover, nme has already been i but no r'sp!y haa been filsd on b' order dated 28.4.2006 (Annexun sn 30.4.2006. As tne poinT Invoived in disputed. therefore, thte wr'it staoe itseif. sne mam grievance of the oMsisi^-^la+s^ OT.01.1971 pssssd b^ Sovsrnrnent of M.P. the petition^ dumb school at Jobolpur in the p< W<33 yOSTSG G7 CjiTTSrSHT GiGC©3 ^lMs^. ®^ 'SRsS^S +l<ltd'i|1-l t|l><fll"ftT5'<il <Rlttfl< ^aTRtirsn^r |i, Senior AdvocaTe wiTh Shri Afroz KhGn, y. 6ovt. Advoea+e for the State. hino i.e. on 4.5.2006 Shri Ashutosh 5inah ^ ^iccspt^o ths notics oy; bshalT of th^ ^exs' time to fiie the r'epi'y, but even afte," g &€£HTi'ea. the petitioner submitted that i+ 13 evident |»jth the petition thct the oetitioner was o sv.'d@iit 'f?lomT th& oMdsr*3 isssjso 'f?to?s t!iT,s |orities, ther'efore, facts are not dispuTed. iranTea TO TH€- responaenTs to r.ue tne repjy, bhulf of the r-edpondent^ anei vide impugned P-1) the petjtioner' hos been mace to retire tjiis petition is very short a"d facts cre "OT pe|tition is being diSposed of at the gdmission t>etjt!oner, raised in this petition, is that vsde Dirsctor. Pcinchsyat ^ Ss^noJ Sswc. srstwhHs wcs appointed as 'teacher' in biind, deaf & ^y sco.ie of Rs.140—240/-and thereafter' he Ifron-i tinie to iime till he was cromoted GS la&KiSBfBiiffitB^iiAitfHriBilllByiiUl-t^a^Ai^^ j rtp^^nLt I!^l&?siiBiBT?v W^wa>B*&H;iS;M4£i(BhsriK^3¥35^^BffiA£¥»6^11^^ •")fcn-'TCT*aEWaiSntSl>i>:Bi]»PK;uaTaTaa. UR9S' (stM^riu <?/<^ XI-HC-78 sn^T^Tf^iN; (T8[T3n^Tst»< L. *11*ICTI a>tTKt> ^ssf -<ll<)ldil, aTliu'is, Rioi'yy ^-^...^..4.^yM... * »* '»-jl»****)l(f»*/•"**••*•^ 200 u^-y 311^1 4i|<B (lclt^q<^!I') ?RIIWltf?tT3n^T -^- ila^pur ilor. Lec+urer vide order da+eci 27.1t) petitione," is thot he hed se"ved| he wos promotsd OR the next l^i! biind. deaf A dumb aehsol at Bila^l to the oost of Assistant Direct proyisions of C.6. Shaakiys Sew|; petiTioner is entiTied to serye t| jnitiaily recruited a-s 'teacher'. T|i vidc M.P. Shaskiya Sewak (ndhiv^ 1998, copy of notification is spps^dsd to Ssstion 2 of ths mentioned that the teccher promotion or otherwi-se ond who .20 years arovided he holds a| department, therefore, the peti-) ths CQS of 62 yssrs. dhivfcrghikiyc Anhexure wnio Perusoi of record /i.nnexu! as teocher in the ysar 1971 and sf Leetur'er' and thereafter' vid4 2 o'f ths Adhifi!ys?n o"? 1998 sj ssrvant known by whctever ncm^ ond on being promoted, even jf hua 5^f*VSu uT i^SoT &i/ vsors eoH •=hi'!itcf<fl-f *<i*<<'fTffFs'<3 <Ri*<i< ^sri^lHsn^T >.19S9 (Anraexure P-3). Fur'i-her1 <;cds of the on the initiai post of teocher cnd thereafte" i^igher post L€. Super'intend^nt rtnn posted at 4pur. The posit of Supsrintendent 'is equivaient ', both are (idministrative posts and ss per .'bk (Adhivarshikiya Ayu) Adhiniyam, 1967 ths !! he aTToins the sge of 62 years, cs he was '^e said Adhiniyaffl of 1967 hcs been aroended f^rghikiyc Ayu] bwitiyct Siiinshodhan ndhiniyairi, P-7, whereby OR expionation hos been ^sld Adhi^sys^ of 199S i^ which !t hc^ bssn Is appointed To on sdministr-otjve post by jias been engaged In teaching for not tess than !ien on a post in the soneerned teaehing honer is entitled for continumci tiii he attains vfde ij'e P-2 shows ThaT the petitioner wcs sppointed Annexure P-3 he wag promoted on the post or-der-ddted 23.2.95 (Annex'ur'e P-4) he uaas promoted to the post of Superirtendent. The expionation appended to Section 'y^isssss's ^Hst 'f'SGcHsp wss"^ s &oysr'w?T'iSn't , if he is appointed for the purpose of tesching ie 'ie appointed on ony administrative and who ^!^.-' 1^.s a^.?it i ^».^ As^^s--*4*.a^ -'^^? 4t-*.*-*^-ssfl ^i^-?" tnUOUo!y', uS ifViii fc£tPSuiSd -S3 tS<3Ch6P . FrOi'H c?/CL. XI-HC.78 311^1 ?>TR-fi+ (raT3TI^5T»'li'»i ^ •><-° .L/ ^< ^ ^' *11*1CTI ^Hleh 35? -^Wlcf^, ®^(lu'i?,Rx'iitiy ^^..^A^^..^ 200 ^—r^ i ! ^ 31l3l!*l llsl* (l?^5"^) SRlTWafeTW^'T z \ the ressrd, which haa bssn met was appointed <as 'teccher' 'm f'r\\ petition he has (3!''eddy seryed explanation appended to Sec-t'^n petitioner is oresentlv workinq San'.aJ Sswa, hs hos to ba tr| retiremenT age and it is on teacher i.s 62 years. Therefon eon+inue in serviee tili he attainl impugned Annexure P-1 wherebk' 30.4.2006 en attaining ths ag^ provlsions of Section 2 of the quashed. In the resu!t, the order doted 28.4.2006 ('Annexurje Zr. viaw OT sbovs ordsf AAl Cost Is mcde easy. Certified co&y a.s per rule^. b+ionecl ssriis", it !S slear that the peti-ions" yessr 1971 and as pe," cverments rncde In the |20 yecrs on the post of teacher snd css per 2 of the Adhiniyani of 1998 even if the t>n the oost of Deeutv Director, Panchavat & oetititsn +l<rfft41-f *<11dTffts'<II <R]<ei< ^si^nsn^r sated as s tsachar for- ths purpsss sf his cd!|nitted position that the r'stir'emsnt oge of a ;, by aii means the petitioner is entitied to i^ the 096 of 62 yefxrs. Aeeordingiy; the order the &etJtioner hos been made to retire on &"f feQ yscrs ss iil^ctl flnd co?it"ory to ths Adhlniycm of 1998 snd scme is licble to be of the petitioner i3 uliQwed and impuqned ^ P-15 is quisshed quo the petitioner. .W.P. No.l75Q/Q& ^tsnd^ als&o^s^ of. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge .•?'