1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 45. CA/13464/2008 In RC/9/2006 WITH CA/13465/2008 In RC/19/2006 WITH CA/13466/2008 In RC/21/2006 WITH CA/13467/2008 In RC/129/2006 WITH CA/13468/2008 In RC/18/2006 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mrs. S.B.Wadmare, AGP for the applicants. ... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 9th July, 2009 ... P.C.:- 1. Heard learned A.G.P. There is delay of 252 days in the group of matters seeking to challenge the enhancement by the Reference Court. The record illustrates, there was already dismissal owing to deficit deposit of court fee. Consequently, by order dt.2nd July, 2008, time was granted to make out the deficit Court fee upto 9th Jan.,2009. The reasons for the delay, apparently, are not deliberate. 2 The application for certified copy was made on 18.10.2004, which was ready for delivery on 16.11.2004, collected on 20th Nov.,2004. The procedural hassels added to the agony and the delay. On this technical ground, apparently, the rights which the State feels are to be addressed, need not be foreclosed. Delay condoned Respective applications allowed. (K.U. CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/45