THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM C.R.P. No. 1754 of 2011 Dated. 01–07-2011 Between: Gampa Sai Ravi Kiran. …Petitioner Vs. Bonda Rama Lakshmi and others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM C.R.P.No. 1754 of 2011 Dated: 01-07-2011 ORAL ORDER: This revision under Article 227 of the Constitution is by the plaintiff in O.S.No. 1561 of 2009, who filed the suit seeking permanent injunction in respect of the suit schedule property of an extent of 40.37 square yards in Mirapakayala Street, Allipuram, G.V.M.C. Limits, Visakhapatnam. The suit was filed against the respondents herein. The revision petitioner filed I.A.No. 915 of 2009 for an ad-interim injunction. Initially an order of status quo was granted, but after contest, by the order dated 15-11-2010 the trial Court -- learned III-Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam, dismissed the application for ad-interim injunction recording a finding that the plaintiff failed to prove prima facie case and balance of convenience and therefore no injunction could be granted. Aggrieved thereby, the revision petitioner filed C.M.A.No. 66 of 2010. By the order dated 30-12-2010, the learned VII-Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Visakhapatnam, rejected the appeal, including on the ground that the petitioner-plaintiff was not in possession of the suit schedule property as on the date of filing of the suit and that he approached the Court for the equitable relief of an injunction on the basis of false assertion of possession of the property. In view of the concurrent findings of fact recorded at the interlocutory stage by the Courts below which do not appear to be perverse or based on a fundamental misconception of law, no case is made out for interference under Article 227 of the Constitution. The revision petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. __________________________ JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM Dated: 01-07-2011 Pvks/*