IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.28591 OF 2008 1. GANESH PRASAD, SON OF CHHATHU PRASAD 2. DINESH PRASAD, SON OF CHHATHU PRASAD BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NAGAOLI, POLICE STATION BASANTPUR, DISTRICT SIWAN VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR ******** 2 21/06/2011 Heard Counsel for the petitioners and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 09.05.2008 passed in Sessions Trial No. 93 of 2008 by which the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. IV, Siwan has rejected the application of discharge. The main contention of the petitioners is that no offence is made out under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. The question whether the ingredients of Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code are made out would be considered by the Court below after taking into account the allegations and the nature of the injuries. In case, the Trial Court find that the ingredients of Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code are not made out, appropriate orders should be passed in accordance with law during the trial of this case. This application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )