IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 31ST MARCH 2011 / 10TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 10399 of 2011(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- RAJESWARAN, S/O.KARUNAKARAN, AGED 47 YEARSS, THITTAYIL VEEDU, PERUNGUZHI P.O., AZHOOR VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. MR. SABU S.KALLARAMOOLA RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695001 2. THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, CHIRAYINKEEZHU TALUK OFFICE, CHIRAYINKEEZHU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 305 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, AZHOOR VILLAGE OFFICE, AZHOOR, CHIRAYINKEEZHU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 305 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. P. N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. W.P.(C) No. 10399 OF 2011 ......................................................................... Dated this the 31st March , 2011 J U D G M E N T The grievance of the petitioner is that despite satisfying the ownership of the petitioner over the property in question as covered by Ext. P1, while seeking for effecting mutation by causing necessary changes in the Revenue records under the Transfer of Registry Rules, it so happened that mutation has been effected by the third respondent in the name of somebodyelse. The petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 representation before the second respondent for immediate interference and to pursue the remedial measures, so as to enable the petitioner to have effected mutation in the name of the petitioner being the owner of the property and to enjoy the same in an effective manner. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 3. In the above circumstance, the second respondent is W.P.(C) No. 10399 OF 2011 2 directed to consider Ext. P2 and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned. This shall be finalised, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the second respondent for further steps. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk