IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 24TH MAY 2007 / 3RD JYAISHTA 1929 Bail Appl..No. 2759 of 2007() ----------------------------- CRMP.1480/2007 of DISTRICT COURT, PALAKKAD CRIME NO.103/07 OF NATTUKAL POLICE STATION .................... : PETITIONERS/ACCUSED: ------------------------------------- 1. RASHEED, S/O. ABU, ARAKKAL HOUSE, PALAKAZHI, KARKKIDAMKUNNU P.O., MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD. 2. SHIHABATHULLA @ MUTHU, S/O.MOHAMMED, ARAKKAL HOUSE, PALAKAZHI, KARKKIDAMKUNNU P.O., MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.VINOD KUMAR.C RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENT: ------------------------ STATE, REPRESENTED BY S.I. OF POLICE, NATTUKAL POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.JAI GEORGE THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/05/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` B.A. No. 2759 OF 2007 ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 24th day of May, 2007 O R D E R Petitioners, who are accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.103/07 of Nattukal Police Station for offences punishable under sections 452, 323, 324 and 308 read with section 34 IPC, seek their enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place at about 1 p.m. on 5.4.07. The petitioners were arrested on 6.4.07. 2. When this application came up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he is not pressing the application on behalf of the 2nd accused and he is pressing the application on behalf of the first accused only. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application submitting, inter alia, that the first accused is an accused in seven theft cases of the very same police station and six of them were committed in the year 2006. He was the person, who allegedly assaulted the injured with a sword. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the first petitioner. This petition is accordingly dismissed. (V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE) aks