IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 1517 of 1992 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- THE ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS Versus SULEMAN BHIBHA -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MR Shah for Petitioner (MR AS KOTHARI) for Respondent No. 1 MR VM PANCHOLI, APP for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Date of decision: 17/11/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petition has become infructuous in view of the fact that the trial is already over and the respondent has been convicted. The respondent has also filed an Appeal against his conviction. Thus, the petition has become infructuous and is accordingly disposed of. Rule discharged. hki