IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3343 of 2010 RAJENDRA SINGH & ORS. Versus SHEOJEE MUKHIA & ORS. ----------- 4. 05.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. It is stated that the peremptory order dated 24.8.2009 passed in the M.J.C.No.2978 of 2008 was complied with just one day’s delay as the Vakalatnama, which had to be filed by 31.8.2009 as per the said order, was filed on 1.9.2009 on account of postal delay. In the above circumstances, the time for complying with the order dated 24.8.2009 is extended to 1.9.2009 and, accordingly, the compliance is held to be within time. M.J.C.No.2978 of 2008 shall thus stand restored and the application is, accordingly, allowed. (Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.) Spal/