IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. COCP No. 901 of 2011. [O&M] Date of Decision: 21st November, 2011. Ved Ram & Ors. Petitioners through Mr. APS Shergill, Advocate Versus Pankaj Aggarwal Respondent through Mr. Aman Chaudhary, Addl.AG, Haryana CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] In view of the fact that this Court has already extended time to comply with the directions contained in the order dated 04.09.2008, this contempt petition is disposed of with a clarificatory direction that the respondent shall do the needful within the extended period and/or within the time that may be extended by this Court, if so required. Disposed of. Rule discharged. November 21, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE