pvr 1 apl793-10 IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL (LODG)NO.793 OF 2010 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1058 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO.2688 OF 2006 Bharat Pramukhlal Patel. ...Appellant vs. 1.Vinita Amrutlal Shah C/o. S.P.Talsania & ors. ...Respondents --- Mr.M.M.Vashi i/b. M/s.M.P.Vashi & Associates, for Appellant. Mr.Snehal Shah i/b. M/s.Purnand & Co., for Respondent nos.1 & 2. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATED: 11th April,2011 P.C.: 1. By this appeal, the appellant challenges the order passed by the learned Single Judge declining to grant leave to the plaintiff to amend the plaint. Perusal of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case Shah Babulal Khimji pvr 2 apl793-10 Vs. Jayaben D.Kania & Anr., (1981)4 Supreme Court Cases 8 shows that rejecting an application for amendment in the plaint is not a judgment within the meaning of Clause 15 of the Letters Patent. Appeal, therefore, is not maintainable. It is rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J.) (ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.)