IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-7464 of 2011 Date of Decision: March 10, 2011 Ram Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana. … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Sharad Kumar Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that all the offences are bailable, therefore, as per Section 436 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, accused shall be released on bail, moment the accused is arrested. Learned counsel fairly states that application seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code for bailable offences is not maintainable. He further states that observation of the learned Sessions Judge that custodial interrogation is required in a bailable offence is unwarranted. Mr. Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, very fairly states that accused shall appear before the Illaqa Magistrate and shall seek bail, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. March 10, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge