IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 10TH OCTOBER 2011 / 18TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 26543 of 2011(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------- JOBSON ANTONY OLAKKENGAL, OLAKKENGAL HOUSE, P.O.PAVERTTY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI. HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT. MEERA V.MENON SRI. MAHESH V.MENON RESPONDENT(S): -------------- 1. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CACLICUT, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, TENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 673 018 2. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, TENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 673 018 R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: BKA WP(C).No. 26543 of 2011(P) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION FILED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER. EXT.P2: COPY OF CHALLAN REMITTED THE PRESCRIBED FEE IN ADDL. SUB TREASURY, THRISSUR. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE BKA ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).26543/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 10th day of October, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioner applied for revaluation of the failed answer script in the 4th semester B.Tech (Computer Science) Examination vide Ext.P1 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. 4.Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs