IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7218 of 2010 1. DAMODAR PASWAN, S/O SRI SOMESHWAR PASWAN, R/O VILLAGE- AMBASARARI, P.S.- JAMUI, DISTRICT- JAMUI. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,JAMUI. 3. THE CIRCLE OFFICER,JAMUI. 4. SURENDRA PAWAN, S/O LATE DAROGI PASWAN, R/O VILLAGE AMBASARARI,P.S.- JAMUI, DISTRICT-JAMUI. ----------- 02. 03.05.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Under the impugned order dated 31.1.2010, Annexure-6 the purcha issued in favour of the petitioner has been set aside by the Collector and the matter has been remitted back to the Circle Officer for fresh consideration at the instance of Surendra Paswan who has purchased the lands in-question in the name of his wife from Sia Devi vide sale-deed dated 28.5.2007 as contained in Annexure-3 to this application. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that had the contents of the sale-deed been perused by the Collector, he would have been satisfied that the subject matter of the purcha has been excluded from the transaction made under the sale deed but the contents of the sale-deed was not perused by the Collector while passing the impugned order dated 31.1.2010, Annexure-6. 4. Having heard counsel for the petitioner and the State, I direct the Circle Officer, Jamui to consider the matter in the light of the contents of the sale-deed dated 28.5.2007 executed by Sia Devi in favour of the wife of Surendra Paswan, Private Respondent No. 4 5. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)