In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Misc. No. 12470/CI of 2008 and RFA No. 5764 of 2008 (O&M) Jarnail Singh ..... Appellant vs Union Territory, Chandigarh ..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. P. C. Dhiman, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. Ms. Alka Chatrath, Advocate, for the respondent. Rajesh Bindal J. The landowner is in appeal before this Court against the award of the learned Court below seeking further enhancement of the compensation for the superstructure on the acquired land. Along with the present appeal, an application for condonation of delay of 106 days in filing the appeal has also been filed. Briefly, the facts are that the land in Villages Jhumru and Burail (Chandigarh), was acquired vide notification issued under Section 4 of the Act on 2.3.2001, for construction of Chandigarh-Ludhiana Broad Gauge Railway Line. The award was passed by the Land Acquisition Collector (for short, `the Collector') on 28.2.2002 granting compensation for superstructures. Aggrieved against the award of superstructures, the landowners filed objections which were referred to the learned Reference Court, who keeping in view the material placed on record by the parties, partly accepted the same by granting increase of 25% on the compensation on account of acquisition of superstructure as was assessed at PWD rates. Since the learned court below had already granted 25% increase on the compensation for acquisition of superstructures at the rate determined by PWD, which is admittedly in conformity with judgment of this court in RFA No. 579 of 2006 Smt. Akko Devi and others vs Union Territory, Chandigarh and another, decided on 1.10.2008, no case for further increase is made out. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed. As the appeal itself is without any merit, I do not find any reason to condone the delay of 106 days in filing the appeal. Resultantly, the application for condonation of delay is also dismissed. 11.5.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge