IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 29TH JULY 2010 / 7TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 12622 of 2010(C) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.K. MURALEEDHARAN KARTHA, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O. SAVITHRKI KUNJAMMA, PUTHUPPARAMBATH, KADATHIL KANAKKU, ERAMALLOOR DESOM, EZHUPUNNA VILLAGE, CHERTHALA TALUK. BY ADV. MR.M.A.SHIHAB RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. REVENUE DIVSIONAL OFFICER, FORT KOCHI. 2. TALUK SURVEYOR, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM. 3. VILLAGE OFFICER, EDAPPALLY SOUTH VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM. ADV. MR. V. MANU – GOVERNMENT PLEADER. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 12622 of 2010 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: COPY OF PARTITION DEED BEARING NO.306/1953 OF EDAPPALLY SRO WITH READABLE COPY EXT.P2: COPY OF POWER OF ATTORNEY HAVING BEARING NO.182/2006 DTD 16.09.2006 OF KUTHIA THODU SRO. EXT.P3; COPY OF REPORT SUBMITTED BY R3 BFORE R2. EXT.P4(a),(b),(c)&(d): COPY OF ENCUMBARANCE CERTIFICATES DTD 10.4.2008, 04.06.2008, 20.10.2008 AND 12.6.2009 OBTAINED FROM THE EDAPPALLY SRO FOR PROPERTY HAVING AN EXTENT OF 1 ACRE 35 CENTS IN SY NO.130/9 OF EDAPPALLY SOUTH VILLAGE. EXT.P5: COPY OF PETITION FILED BEFORE R1 DTD 7/12/2009. EXT.P6: COPY OF APPLICATIONN DTD 23.10.2009 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE R3. EXT.P7: COPY OF THE APPLICATION UNDER RULE 43 OF THE SURVEY AND BOUNDARIES RULE FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE R2. EXT.P8: COPY OF THE APPLICATIN FILED BY THE SAID NASSAR BEFORE THE RDO, FORTKOCHI. EXT.P9; COPY OF THE ORDER OF RDO FORT KOCHI. TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE. S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.12622 OF 2010 ------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner seeks survey and demarcation of boundaries of his property. In respect of the same, the Revenue Divisional Officer has passed Ext.P8 order dated 10.5.2010, which is produced along with I.A.No.9387/10, but the same is wrongly marked as Ext.P8 instead of Ext.P9 in accordance with the index. The petitioner seeks a direction to the Taluk Surveyor to comply with Ext.P8 order expeditiously. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to implement the order marked as Ext.P8 in I.A.No.9387/10 but shown as Ext.P9 in the index, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE acd