IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.8349 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:21.12.2010 Narinder Sharma ...Petitioner Versus Kiran Jyoti ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Veneet Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. ****** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 16.11.2010 passed by the learned District Judge, Amritsar by which application filed by the petitioner under Order 19 Rule 17 and Order 6 Rule 17 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [for short “CPC”] to recall the respondent for her further cross-examination and to make necessary correction in the affidavit of the petitioner tendered in the Court in his examination-in-chief, has been dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned Court below has committed an error in exercise of its jurisdiction while dismissing the application on the ground that the amendment cannot be allowed for the purpose of withdrawing the admission made in the affidavit which is tendered in the examination-in-chief on oath. Insofar as the recalling of the respondent for her further cross-examination is concerned, that was not allowed on the ground that the case is ripe for arguments and the petitioner cannot be allowed to fill up the lacunae in his case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that insofar as the amendment in the affidavit is concerned that may not be allowed but insofar as the recalling of the respondent for her further cross-examination is concerned, that may be allowed in the interest of justice. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any merit in the present case to permit the petitioner to recall the respondent for the purposes of further cross- examination. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed in limine. No costs. December 21, 2010 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE