dlli !r]l'.)i ;.s:asUB*tt!Nii»WfAiUai ^ CF u IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH C.R.NO. ^) /2005 /APPLICANT Plaintiff RAM NARAYAN aged about 65 years S/o. Relha Sonkar, R/o. Titurghat, Tahsil Dhamdha, District Durg (C.G.) ^efendants VERSUS NON-APPLICANTS :^< KANWAL RAM S/o Ghanaram Sonkar 2. SMT.BODHANI BAI D/o Ghanaram 3, AHILIYA BAI Wd/o Ghanaram All R/o Titurghat, Thasil Dhamdha, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 4. State of M.P. (Now Chhattisgarh) Through Collector, Distt. Durg (C.G.) ..o- ,{B /? s €-^ —REV^ISLONUNDER SECTION 115 OF CODE OF iAaiBlie.BSUMI 1 lllll ni l»nunNU-,,illflt»»» 's^t "4i^i«*i,®Ti1'y;is,'N^rray c. ^, f^p- <TI ) O^ 3lA?E '^^! (l'sit-i»<s4) <MI^I W ft-li* w an^i shiro ftsi Shri, C.R. Sahu.counsei for Shri Sahu, learned counsel instruction, seeks permission o| revision with liberty to avai) the a| is'i/'sii'^hits A^~- ^iiy^ i '!"\-^^:y ^^Si ^t**'^\/lcii^l avcSiic.isjiC lu iin^ yuusi li ES ijiuvi'aii-j Th^s H^-^srfv^ ;s; n"%rit;ar^ 5S^5.''-J*i"''i i i iS i!SjiSUV iS ijiiS^U^U, &}^ ^J'J Accordingiy, the revision'l^ the sforesaid iiberty. L-sarned counse! for the app| the Impugnec! order be returned to hl| Registry is dSrected to return ^ order on counsel's fumishing authen| tfie apDiicant. lappearing fo.r the appiicant, on tHic? f^.f'M ;?* '*'/*>> "-A'ltH/^ys1.*? A^ ^UUU IU WlliiUl CiW liiii |)propriaSe remedy that may be ins or law. ifeyed for. , dismissed' as wlthdrawn with jcant prays that csrtified copy of fri. ^ he certified copy of ths Impugnsd ilcated true copy of the same. Al-! Sd/- N, K. Agarwal Judge t rx t'.'^*?'