1 ra 128.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW PETITION NO. 128 OF 2011 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 92 OF 2011 Kalidas S/o Babarao Kadam .. Applicant Versus 1. Babu S/o Sardar Shaikh and others .. Respondents Shri R. P. Bhumkar, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri M. B. Kolpe, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 07TH OCTOBER, 2011. PER COURT : . Shri Bhomkar, the learned counsel for the review petitioner submits that the defendant is in possession of the suit property. The oral evidence supports the case of the present review petitioner that the review petitioner is in possession of the suit property. This aspect is not taken into consideration while second appeal is dismissed vide order dated 29th March, 2011. The learned counsel submits that, even there is no record to show that the plaintiffs are in possession. In view of the same seeks 2 ra 128.11 review of the order passed by this Court on 29.03.2011 dismissing the Second Appeal No. 92/2011. 2. The scope of review as per Sec. 114 read with Order 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure is in narrow campas. This Court while dismissing the second appeal has observed that the first Appellate Court has specifically recorded the finding that the Government record shows that the plaintiffs are encroachers over the suit property. The land is Government land. In view of that the the defendants cannot claim any right. Both the Courts and this Court also had rejected the relief of declaration sought by plaintiffs. 3. In view of the above no error apparent on face of record in passing the order sought to be reviewed. The review petition is dismissed. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/Oct. 11