IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19861 of 2009 SANJAY KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18.6.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This petition for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner, who is an accused for offences punishable under Sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code as well as Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the husband of the complainant and is in service at Delhi and he had also taken his wife, namely, the complainant to Delhi, but after some times she without informing the petitioner left Delhi and returned to her Maika after living with the petitionr for a very short period leveling false and filthy charges against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that the entire allegation is absolutely false and frivolous and the petitioner is always ready and willing to keep the complainant as his legally wedded wife with all due care, protection and affection. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, this petition is allowed. In case of surrender/arrest within fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order in the court below, petitioner, namely, Sanjay Kumar shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000.00 (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like - 2 - amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Gaya in connection with Kotwali P.S.case No.72 of 2008 arising out of Complaint case no.1481 of 2007 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Narendra/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )