C.W.P. No.11201 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No.11201 of 2010 Date of Decision: 21.09.2011 Sumitra Aneja ....Petitioner Versus Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Jagbir Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohnish Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 10. Mr. Surender Saini, Advocate for respondent No.11. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) The petitioner, herein, is seeking quashing of the order dated 03.06.2010 passed by respondent No.3 by which the petitioner has been directed to deposit ` 9,30,000/- on account of undeducted works contract tax from respondent No.11. One of the argument of learned counsel for the petitioner, while challenging the impugned order is that the said order has been passed without any enquiry. Mr. Mohnish Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents has pointed out that in fact charge sheet has already been issued to the C.W.P. No.11201 of 2010 2 petitioner on 09.07.2010 (Annexure R-1/2). The petitioner has already submitted her reply to the said charge sheet as early as on 09.08.2010. In view of the above, without going into the merits of the case at this stage, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to complete the enquiry as expeditiously as possible preferably within six months from today keeping in mind that the petitioner is due to retire on 31.07.2012. Till as such time, the enquiry is completed, the order dated 03.06.2010 shall be kept in abeyance. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 21.09.2011 JUDGE gurpreet