1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Second Appeal Nos.554/2005, 555/2005, 556/2005, 557/2005, 558/2005, 559/2005 and 614/2008. (with Civil Applications) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. N.E.Deshmukh, Counsel, holding for Mr. S.B.Talekar, Counsel for the appellants. ... CORAM: K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE :25-3-2010 *** PER COURT : 1. Heard Mr.N.E.Deshmukh, Counsel, holding for Mr. S.B.Talekar, Counsel for the appellants. It was informed that a representation is made to the Registrar, High Court, Appellate Side, dt.7th July, 2007, giving reference to Second Appeal nos. 690/2005 to 700/2005 and Writ Petition No. 4618/1995 (Bombay number) (Writ Petition No. 2309/1996, Aurangabad number) and the 2 matter is communicated to the Honourable the Chief Justice, regarding hearing of Second Appeals along with the Writ Petition No.2309/1996. Learned Counsel submits that Second Appeals(Nos.554/2005, 555/2005, 556/2005, 557/2005, 558/2005, 559/2005 and 614/2008) touch to the outcome of the Writ Petition No.2309/1996 and, consequently, the same can be disposed of. 2. Since the questions raised in the Writ Petition are touching to the subject matter of the Second Appeals, the outcome of the writ petition will have its binding effect on both the parties. In the Writ Petition, a permission was granted to the respective appellant to reconstruct the structure that was demolished by the Municipal Council, Dhule, at the place where it existed prior to demolition - even the authorities of M.S.E.B. and Telephone - 3 Department were directed to restore the respective amenities. 3. According to the learned counsel grounds raised in the Writ Petition No. 2309/1996 and Second Appeal Nos. 690/2005 to 700/2005, will certainly cover the orders in the present set of Second Appeals. 4. In the situation, these Second Appeals are disposed of with observation, the effects and findings in the Writ Petition shall be binding to the parties litigating in the Second Appeals. Respective Second Appeals (Nos. 554/2005, 555/2005, 556/2005, 557/2005, 558/2005, 559/2005 and 614/2008) and Civil Applications disposed of. [K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.] ... agp/554-05sagr