IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.2868 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:23.02.2011 Suresh Kumar Garg . . .Petitioner Versus R.K. Kalyana . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Jai Vir Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate, for the respondent. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against order passed by the Rent Controller, Panchkula dated 20.4.2010 by which evidence of the petitioner/tenant has been ordered to be closed. De hors the pleas, which have been raised in the grounds of revision petition, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a prayer that if one more opportunity is granted at his own risk and responsibility, he would complete his entire evidence on the date already fixed by the Rent Controller. Learned counsel for the respondent, however, submits that the respondent has been unnecessarily harassed by the petitioner and has been dragged to this Court because of this revision petition for which he should be suitably compensated. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, revision petition is allowed and order dated 20.4.2010 is hereby set aside. Petitioner is granted one last opportunity to lead his entire evidence at his own risk and responsibility on the date already fixed before the Rent Controller, Panchkula, subject to payment of `5000/- as costs. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) FEBRUARY 23, 2011 JUDGE Vivek