1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 13678 of 2008. Date of Decision: 30th December, 2010. Baldev Singh …..Petitioner. Versus State of HP and others …..Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the Petitioner: Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. R.M. Bisht, Dy. A.G. No. 1 to 4 Sanjay Karol, J. (Oral). Matter was heard for some time. Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that his client shall be content, if liberty is granted to the petitioner to pursue the matter before the respondents. Liberty granted. Accordingly, let the petitioner make a representation to respondent No. 2 within a period of four weeks. Any such representation made shall be considered and decided by respondent No. 2 within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt thereof. Needless to add, respondents shall pass a speaking order, which shall be communicated to the petitioner. 2. With the aforesaid observations, present petition stands disposed of. (Sanjay Karol) Judge December 24, 2010 (KRS) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?