IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.Rev. (T) No. 53 of 2008 Decided on: 29.10.2010 State of Himachal Pradesh …Petitioner. Versus Surya Prakash …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner : Mr. P. M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For the respondent : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : The Judgment relied on by the petitioner rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in State of Himachal Pradesh versus Ashwani Kumar & Ors, 1996(2) SC, SLJ, Volume 23, 294 is not applicable to the facts and circumstances of the present case, since the same deals with the regularization and not with reinstatement. Moreover, Mr. P.P.Chauhan, learned counsel for the respondent has stated at Bar that the respondent has already been regularized. 2. Consequently, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge October 29, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? no