HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.2103 OF 2006 AND 2105 OF 2006 Date:08-07-2010 CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2103 OF 2006: Between: G. Nageswara Reddy S/o. Lakshmi Reddy …. Petitioner AND Special Deputy Collector, Srisailam Project, Nandikotkur, Kurnool District. …. Respondent CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2105 OF 2006: Yerram Chinna Sankara Reddy S/o. Late Ramachandra Reddy …. Petitioner AND Special Deputy Collector, Srisailam Project, Nandikotkur, Kurnool District. …. Respondent HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.2103 OF 2006 AND 2105 OF 2006 COMMON ORDER: Since a common question arose in both these revisions, they are being heard together and taken up for disposal. 2. Heard both sides. 3. CRP No.2103 of 2006 is filed by G.Nageswara Reddy against the order dated 06-04-2006 in I.A. No.35 of 2006 in LAOP No.7 of 1992 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Nandikotkur, to reopen LAOP No.7 of 1992 to adduce evidence on his side. 4. CRP No.2105 of 2006 is filed by Yerram Chinna Sankara Reddy against the order dated 06-04-2006 in I.A. No.34 of 2006 in LAOP No.1233 of 1991 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Nandikotkur, to reopen LAOP No.1233 of 1991 to adduce further evidence. 5. Admittedly, there are serious laches on the part of the petitioners herein, apart from the fact that they have approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, whereby the writ petition filed by them was dismissed as withdrawn. Even otherwise, the trial Court did not find it proper to show any indulgence in favour of the petitioners especially after lapse of 14 years. 6. In view of the discretion exercised by the trial Court, I do not find any reasons to interfere with the orders passed by the trial Court. 7. Accordingly, both the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed. No order as to costs. __________________ B. PRAKASH RAO, J July 08, 2010 KTL