e «Ctt- ^c ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRITPETITIONNO.^^7 /2004 PETITIONER ^4^ ^5y ?^'-'0 ^-' v ^'.^ ^' RESPONDENTS ^::;"^':^^ ^.^ ^•^-^ / v^ ^- ..A r^ it l'frl! •fvj // ^<'-^y Srat Jasinta Khesh, wife of Shri Hilariyns Khesh, aged about 40 years, Assistant Teacher, Government Primary School - Rajpur, Vikas Khand ~ Lailunga, Tah. Lailunga, Distt. Raigarh Chhattisgarh. Resident of - Lailunga, Rajpur, Distt. Raigarh (CG) VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through : the Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh ,^ ,, Bhawan, Raipur (C G) ^•^ ^ 2. The Commissioner, Department of Tribal Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Collector, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) 4. The Assistant Comniissioner, Tribal Welfare, Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE ORDER / ORDERS, DIRECTION / DIRECTIONS. XI-HC-22 ~S^( -qt^lld^, ^Tl1<i4i<o, fG«nt^li< 3TT^T^T R^i^ ^^ 5h^i<=h ^f^^l Palfaak ,^^< ^ ^ wwi^ ^' ^W<^\ 5b*<|ch 3ni^r xr5ra? ^.:i:..^:...^M^^ft "f^^' '^ 3?T^?T ^TTW^rf^T 20-8-2004 chl^(<n4il 'RTR^lf ^ feT^t <F^'(^J< ^ ^ti^FT^Tr^T Pedtioner by Shn /). A/, ^vft^-h-, fi({\/. State bv Shn V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Heard. lAdvocate G-eneral. This batch of cases lelate to tr^risfer of the petitioners from therr resp.xtive places. Counsel for the petilioners submi(l:ed that, the transfer of the petilioners h&s been effected illegally in contravention of law ^fid policy. State counsel opposed it. ^etitioners have siraighnvay filed the peiiiioiis ^e. and representation. under the law, shall consider and decide law as early as possible preferably withiil With the aforesaid observations, tl(iis petition stands disposed of. State. counsel submitied that the without sen'mg notice fo? demand ofjusti{ Having heard and considered tljie rival contentions, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, in the| served if a directibn is given to the peti^ their grievances and grounds before fhe respondents along with a copy ofthe peti^ representation being filed, the State Gove|nmenVcompetent authority ofthe respondents lopinion ofthis Court, ends ofjustice will be |ioners to make detailed representation raising [State GoveminenVccmpetent authority of the [ion and this order, within 10 days, and on such |he same on its ovm merits in accordance with ISLX weeks firom fhe date of receipVproduction tnents. of the ^representation, If any contravent^on of policy or guidelines is brought to the notice^ the same be considered on its own \ Counsel for the petitioners pray fh( grievance of the petitioners remains, theyj under the law. They may avail the remedy ^t after the decision ofthe representation ifany [ may be allowed to avail the remedy available ^vailsible under the law.. Consequently M.W.P., ifany, alscj Certified copy as per mles. Copy to State counsel for compliajice. stands disposed of Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge y-^in^