IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN THURSDAY, THE 21ST OCTOBER 2010 / 29TH ASWINA 1932 RCRev..No. 79 of 2008() ----------------------- RCA.25/2005 of RENT CONTROL APPELLATE AUTHORITY, ALAPPUZHA RC.OP.9/2004 of RENT CONTROL COURT ,ALAPPUZHA .................... PETITIONER/APPELLANT/PETITIONERS IN R.C.P. -------------------------------------------------------------- S.JANAKI AMMAL, AGED 82 YEARS, W/O. LATE BALAKRISHNA REDDIAR, JANAKI NIVAS, PALACE WARD, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.R.HARIKRISHNAN SRI.N.ASHOK KUMAR SMT.A.SINDHULAKSHMY SMT.R.REMA SRI.E.JAYADEV RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT/COUNTER PETITIONER IN R.C.P. ------------------------------------------------------ P.VENKITERAMA IYER, VENKITARAMA NIVAS, SANATHANAM WARD, ALAPPUZHA. ADV. SRI.K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN THIS RENT CONTROL REVISION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. ------------------------ R.C.R.No. 79 OF 2008 ------------------------ Dated this the 21st day of October, 2010 O R D E R Pius C.Kuriakose, J. Mr.K.S.Hariharaputhran, learned counsel for the respondents, submits that the respondent has already vacated the premises. Hence the RCR became unnecessary. The above submission is not disputed by Sri.R.Harikrishnan, learned counsel for the revision petitioners. Under the above circumstances, we dismiss the RCR as unnecessary. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE dpk