<?? tjrT31. ^/^,^U 1. Dhanneadra Kumar IXibey, aged about soa ofLate SM Gasiesh Sliankar Du'bey, Peon, iathe Qtfice ofDirector Welfare, Distt. Kabeerdfaain (C.G.) vears, as .^a.L'K h3j Bannaiya, aged about 57 years, worki Deputy Director, PanchaVat and Soci Kawafuha, Distt. Kabeerdhain (C.G.; ooai. : 1. State of Chha.ttisgarh, throu^i the Chief Dai Kalyan Siagh Bhawaii, Raipur (C.G.) 2. State of Madhva Pradesh. throueh the accretot-y, Govemmetit ofMadhya Pradesli, Bl 3. The Secretarv, Department ofPanchavat and Welfare, Vallabh Bhawaii, Bfaopal (M 4. The Secretary, Department of Panchavat aiid Welfare, Dau Kalyaa Siugli Bhawaii, Raipur (C.G) 5, Union of In.dia- through the Ministn' of Ncw Dcllii. •WMT PETl'nON UNDER ARnCLE 226 OF THE CONSTmJTION OF IND1A Shri V.V'yay, Advocate forthepet Sl-u'i A.S.KacMiwaha, Depu'ty Advocate Geaeral for t2ie State/ .4. SEni AK.Bai-ik, Advocate a ring ou behalfoi oflndia. iliri S.K.J ;Br: (Passed OB 04m day of ,^priS, 2008) Leamed counsei appearing fbr the petitioncrs subnrits that he does not want to press fhis petition on merit, excepft that fhe petitioaers be pemiitted to make a represeiitation to the Conm'iittee in light of the snt ^iid order 17 Anril 5007 naRsp.d hv -th's Cnnrt <" ^ f £. Jb^/fl Js,A^ ^A\J^^ S ^f^AJ^-^^h- ^^ ^ ^-JLJUE.hJ J^r1l^7 [k^-<E. ^ .1^^ B.R.Godbole Vs. Mutiicipai Corporation, Dwg, and otbers (2007 (2) A-if- /f''sifi I ':;aaBal 1 i^—.^,s'i 2. 2 Accordingly, the petition is disposed of ia the same terms i.e. the Committee so constituted is directed to consider tfae representalion made by the petitioners, if iii'-•a a.s eartv >le, preferab!y within a period of t'hree months from the dat.e of keeping in miad the fa.et of residence and posting of the employees in. ;ouse G ;Jjrut tbree months from the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge 1