IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. S. NARAYANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 910 OF 2010 Between: D. Nirmala & Anr. … Petitioners V/s. M. Venkateswarly … Respondent Counsel for the Petitioners : Sri Y. Venugopal Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : None appeared THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. S. NARAYANA * * * * * CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 9 1 0 OF 2010 O R D E R : It is stated by the learned Judge that the counsel is directed to submit his arguments in C.M.A. itself. With the above observation the application was dismissed. No doubt, several grounds had been raised in the present Civil Revision Petition. The respondents had been served, none represents the respondents. 2. In the light of the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is of the considered opinion that the impugned order not being a speaking order, the same is hereby set aside and the matter is remanded to the learned Principal District Judge, Kurnool to decide the application afresh in accordance with law or in the alternative to dispose of the main Civil Miscellaneous Appeal itself at the earliest point of time, as the case may be. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs. __________________________ JUSTICE P. S. NARAYANA. 18-06-2010. I s L THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 9 1 0 OF 2010 Circulation Entry No. 53 Date: 18-06-2010 Computer No. 43 Court Master: I s L