C.P. 308/2005 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONEMPT PETITION NO. 308/2005 RAMNATH S/O DHONDIBA WAYAL VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA _____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________ Mr. V.B. Ghatge, A.G.P. for respondents No.1 and 4. Smt. Madheshwari Thube (Mhase), Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. Date : 5th January, 2011 1 Heard. 2 The petitioner’s advocate is not present. It is not clear whether the petitioner is interested in pressing the application. Shri S.D. Kaldate, A.G.P. appearing for respondent No.1 pointed out that in view of Section 20 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971, the action initiated on 02/12/2010 was barred by limitation and so the petition is not maintainable. I am keeping the matter back for the petitioners advocate to address the Court on this C.P. 308/2005 2 point. Keep Back. [A.V. NIRGUDE, J.] 3 Later on : Mr. Nitin B. Suryawanshi, Advocate for petitioner is present. 4 In reply to the contempt application, the respondents No.2 and 3 have filed a detailed affidavit on 20th June, 2006. In this affidavit, the respondents No.2 and 3 have given the calculation and break up of the salary payable to the petitioner from 21/07/1999 till 17/07/2002. They also mentioned as to how much amount they have deducted from the total salary payable to the petitioner. This break up is separately shown in Exh. A page No. 28 of the petition. According to this break up, the applicant according to the respondents No.2 and 3 was entitled to receive a sum of Rs.1,61,207. The amount has been deposited by the respondents No.2 and 3 in the Court and I am told the amount is received by the petitioner. The petitioner has snot challenged the correctness of the calculation and break up of the salary and deductions etc.. Since there is no rejoinder filed by the petitioner, I take it C.P. 308/2005 3 that he has admitted correctness of the calculation of his salary and deductions. In view of this, nothing survive in the contempt petition. It stands disposed of. [A.V. NIRGUDE, J.] ts k/