IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 25TH JUNE 2010 / 4TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 18562 of 2010(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- DR.ANITHA SOMAN, HOMOEO MEDICAL OFFICER, GOVERNMENT HOMOEO HOSPITAL, KURICHI, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.J.JAYAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRI.SECRETARY, HEALTH DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF HOMEOPATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1. 3. DR.S.SHYLESH KUMR, GOVT. HOMOEO DISPENSARY, VAKKOM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST.-691532 4. DR.R.S.PRASANTH, GOVT. HOMOEO DISPENSARY NAGROOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT PIN-695618. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.ARAVINDKUMAR BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 18562 OF 2010 (U) ===================== Dated this the 25th day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is a Homoeo Medical Officer. She has now been transferred from Champakulam to Kurichi. According to the petitioner, in the matter of transfer, her seniority has been overlooked, and therefore the writ petition is filed. Particular reference is made about the postings that have been given to 3rd and 4th respondents. 2. However, learned Government Pleader on instruction submits that in so far as the 3rd respondent is concerned, he is posted at Vakkom, a station opted by the petitioner, taking into account the outstation and remote services that he has rendered in the past. It is stated that he has served in Wynad itself for the period from 1998 to 2003. In so far as the 4th respondent is concerned, according to the learned Government Pleader, although he too was proposed to be transferred when the draft lift was published, considering the fact that he is a physically handicapped person he has been retained at Nagroor, the other station opted by the petitioner. WPC No. 18562/10 :2 : 3. There is nothing to doubt the genuineness of the submissions made by the learned Government Pleader. In such a situation, I do not think the petitioner has made out a case for interference in a proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 4. Be that as it may, if the petitioner has any grievance about the present posting, I direct that it will be open to the petitioner to move an appropriate representation to the 2nd respondent. It is ordered that if a representation is received within two weeks from today, within four weeks thereafter, the same shall be duly considered and orders thereon shall be passed. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp