IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 2ND FEBRUARY 2010 / 13TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 3372 of 2010(V) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. MURALIKRISHNAN.V,VARIKKOTTIL HOUSE, MALAMALKKAV P.O,PALAKKAD DIST. 679 554. 2. SIVADASAN.V.VARIKKOTTIL HOUSE, MALAMALKKAV P.O,PALAKKAD DIST. 679 554. 3. C.V.PADMANABHAN,CHENATH VALAPPIL HOUSE, MALAMALKKAV P.O,PALAKKAD DIST. 679 554. 4. SULAIMAN.V.K.,VEDITHARACKAL HOUSE, MALAMALKKAV P.O,PALAKKAD DIST. 679 554. 5. CHANDRAN.V.,VARIKKOTTIL HOUSE, MALAMALKKAV P.O,PALAKKAD DIST. 679 554. 6. VISHWANATHAN.V,VARIKKOTTIL HOUSE, MALAMALKKAV P.O,PALAKKAD DIST. 679 554. 7. SAIDALI.K.K.,KADAMKULATHIL HOUSE, MALAMALKKAV P.O,PALAKKAD DIST. 679 554. 8. KUNJUMUHAMMED,KATTILAMPURATH HOUSE, MALAMALKKAV P.O,PALAKKAD DIST. 679 554. 9. SREEDHARAN.C,CHENAMKUZHIYIL HOUSE, MALAMALKKAV P.O,PALAKKAD DIST. 679 554. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.RAJAGOPALAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE SECRETARY, DEPT OF HEALTH SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. WPC NO.3372/2010 2. ANAKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, P.O.KUMBIDI, PALAKKAD DIST. 3. THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, PALAKKAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 4. DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER,PALAKKAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 5. BHARATI AIRTEL LTD., S.L.AVENUE, N.H.BYPASS,KUNDANOOR, MARADU.P.O, KOCHI- 682 304. 6. ABOOBACKER, MANKUZHIVALAPPIL HOUSE, ANAKKARA P.O, PALAKKAD DIST. MS.K.R.DEEPA, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.3372 of 2010 (V) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 2nd day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioners are objecting to installation of a mobile tower by the 5th respondent in the property belonging to the 6th respondent. It is seen that they have filed Ext.P1 representation before the 2nd respondent. 2. If as stated, Ext.P1 representation has been received, it is up to the 2nd respondent to deal with the same. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of directing that the 2nd respondent shall consider Ext.P1 with notice to all affected parties and pass orders thereon on the production of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this writ petition before the 2nd respondent for compliance. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg