1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.64 OF 2009 (Vijaysingh s/o Anandrao Rajagadkar vs. State and others) ___________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 12, 2009 Heard Shri Mishra, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Shri Thakre, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent No.1. The petition is directed against the order dated 17.12.2008 passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal whereby original application filed by the respondent no.4 against the order of transfer dated 12.5.2008 came to be allowed and order of transfer came to be set aside. We have considered the contentions of the learned Counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order. Perusal of the impugned order shows that action of respondent Authorities in transferring respondent no.4 from Kapra to Sonali was in violation of provisions of Section 4(4)(ii) of 2 the Maharashtra Government Servants Regulation of Transfers and Prevention of Delay in Discharge of Official Duties Act, 2005. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for showing indulgence. The petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE khj