IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT TUESDAY, THE 4TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 13TH BHADRA 1929 WP(C).No. 23548 of 2007(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ K.C. UNNI, S/O. CHENNAN, KUTANKULANGARA HOUSE, THALAPPILLY TALUK, AGATHIYUR.P.O.THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE THRISSUR. 2. DYSP (ADMINISTRATION) THRISSUR. 3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KUNNAMKULAM. 4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KUNNAMKULAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. GIKKU JACOB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R. BASANT, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.C.No. 23548 of 2007 C - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 4th day of September, 2007 JUDGMENT The petitioner had earlier come to this Court with Writ Petition No.18578 of 2006. After detailed hearing, by judgment dt.19.1.2007 the said writ petition was dismissed with observations. The action taken by the Superintendent of Police was reported to this Court. The petition was dismissed with observations that if the petitioner has any justifiable grievance in future, he can make complaint to the Superintendent of Police, who shall do the needful. 2. The petitioner has now come to this Court with this writ petition. At the time of hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner makes only one request. He prays that the judgment dt. 19.1.2007 may not be permitted to fetter the rights of the petitioner under law to claim damages/initiate prosecution for offences committed by his adversaries. 3. A reading of Ext.P5 makes it clear that the said judgment cannot and does not fetter the rights, if any, which the petitioner has under law. No clarification appears to be necessary. W.P.C.No. 23548 of 2007 2 4. This writ petition is, in these circumstances, dismissed with the above observations. (R. BASANT) Judge tm