IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL. Writ Petition No. 218/08(M/S) (Distt-Nainital) H.B. Singhal, Son of Sri Amar Nath, Unit Chief, H.M.T. Watches Limited, Watch factory-V, Ranibagh, District Nainital. ……Petitioner. Versus Recovery Officer, Employees Provident Fund Organisation, Sub-Regional Officer, Haldwani, Uttarakhand and others. ……Respondents. Sri V. K. Bisht Senior Advocate assisted by Sri B.S. Bhandari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri K. P. Upadhyay, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the respondent nos. 3 to 6. Sri Ashok Agarwal, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2. Date: - 18.8.08 Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard Sri V. K. Bisht, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri B.S. Bhandari, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri K.P. Upadhyay, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the respondent nos. 3 to 6 and Sri Ashok Agarwal, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for the following reliefs:- (i) issue a writ, direction or order in the nature of certiorari by quashing the order dated 07.01.08 (annexure no. 1) passed by respondent no. 2 to this writ petition. (ii) Issue any other order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of present case. (iii) To award the cost of present writ petition in favour of petitioner. Sri V. K. Bisht, Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner has stated that the petitioner has resigned from his post Unit Chief, H.M.T. watches Limited, Watch Factory-V. The writ petition was filed for the purpose of not taking coercive measure on the basis of non-bailable warrant. The order of issuing non-bailable warrant was stayed by this Court vide interim order dated 5.2.08. Other officers are appearing before the authority concerned (respondent nos. 1 and 2. In view of the fact that the officers are appearing before the respondent nos. 1 and 2 and the non- bailable warrant was issued for the purpose of bringing the petitioner before the respondent no. 1, the relief sought has become infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed as the relief sought has become infructuous. All pending applications stands disposed of accordingly. (B.S.Verma, J.) 18.8.08 RMY