HlGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BiLASPUR Sioaie Bench : non'bte Shri Diiip Raosaheb Deshmukh, j. ADMicants/ Appellants Respondents M.C.C.No. 345 of 2009 Burmanial, S/o Arjunlai Shrivas, aged about 36 years, R/o Kelo Br'dge, Be!adu!a Road, Raigarh, Tahsii & District - Raigarh (C.G.) Since dead through his L.R.s. 1. Radh-a Krishna Shrivas, S/o Late Burmaniai, aged about 47 years, 2. Ripusudan Shrivas, S/o Burmanial, aged about 55 years, Both R-/O Kelo Bridge, Beladula, Raigarh Versus 1. State of Madhya Pradesh (Now Chhattisgarh) through CoSIector, Raigarh 2A. Smt. Janaknandini, W/o Jagdish, R/o Lajpatnagar, New Delhi. B. Ku. Vijyalaxmi, D/o Late Madanmohan Rabra, R/o Gourishankar ^4andir Road, Raigarh (C.G.) C. Smt. Jajshree. W/o Bajjnath, R/o Near Poiytechnic Coilege, Chakradhar Nagar, Raigarh (C.G.) D. Anand ^4ohan Rabra, S/o Madan Mohan Rabra, Advccate, Raigam, R/o Gourishankar Mandir Road, Raigarh (C.G.) APPLICATiON FOR EXTENTION OF TISVIE FOR DEPOSITlNG OF COST OF R.S.30Q/- Present : Shri B.D.Badgaiyan, counse! for the applicante. Shri G.D.Vaswani, G.A. forthe State/Respondent No.1 ORAL ORDER (Passed on 24m August 2009) Heard on admission. 2. This M.C.C. is for extension of time for depositing ^fcost of Rs.300/- ordered on 10.01.2008 in M.C.C.No. 580/2007. 3. Brief facts are that First Appeai No. 8/2001 was dismjssed on 03.09.2007 in defauit. M.C.C. No. 472/2007 was filed for restoration of First Appeah No.8/2001. By order dated 05.11.2007 M.C.C.No. 472/2007 was dismissed in default since despite repeated calls in the pre-iunch and post- iunch session, no one appeared for the applicants. An appiication •j::; • ;:'"',jj' ^z- ^ M.C.C.N0.5SO/2007 was fiied for restoration of M.C.C.No.472/2007. By order dated 10.01.2008 M.C.C.No.580/2007 was alfowed subject to deposit of cost of Rs.300/'- with the High Court Legaj Aid Committee within a period ofseven days starting from 10.01.2008. The appiicant took no steps for deposit of cost of Rs.300/-, as ordered in M.C.C.No.580/2007, ttll date. On 21.08.2009, the present M.C.C.No.345/2009 was fiied for extension of time for deposit of costs. 4. Considering the ract that no steps were taken from 10.01.2008 tiii date, as ordered, and the iaches on the part of the appljcants, no further extension of time can be granted. 5. Mi.C.C. is therefore dismissed at the admission stage. —tf-u