IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5427 of 2009 BINDESHWARI SINGH @ BINDESHWARI PRASAD SINGH & ORS W i t h Cr.Misc. No.3888 of 2009 PRAMILA DEVI & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 22/05/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State as also learned counsel for the complainant who has appeared suo motu. The petitioners who all belong to one family apprehend arrest in a complaint case under Sections- 323, 379 and 147 of I.P.C. It is submitted that the complainant is none other than their neighbour. The allegations are of a money dispute between them. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that earlier the petitioners had filed Complaint Case No.551C/08 in which the complainant being a lady also had to obtain regular bail along with family members. In the fitness of things this Court considers it proper to direct that if the petitioners surrender within four weeks and pray for regular bail, their application for regular bail shall be considered in the like manner as was done to the complainant herself in 2 the background of the dispute between the neighbours when the complainant herself has been enlarged on regular bail, without being prejudiced by the reluctance of this Court to interfere at this stage. The applications are rejected. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)