•; THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Applicant Non-Applicant ResRondente AppSicant irimina! Revision No. 161 of 2006 Vikram (wrongly mentioned as Vikray) aged about 74 years, S/o. Aghari Caste-Satnami, Occupation-Agriculture, R/o. Viltage- Putkikala Chowki, Pandataria, P.S. Kunda Dist. Kabirdham (Kawardha) (C.G.) Versus 1. Ful Bai, W/o. Vikram Aged about 52 years Occupation-Home work R/o. Viilage Putkikaia, At present Viil. Bhareli, P.S. Bodla Tah. Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) 2. District Magistrate Kabirdham (Kawardha) (C.G.) CRIMINAL REVISION U/S 397/401 OF THE CRIMiNAL PROCEDURE CODE (SB: Hon'bie IWr. T.P. Sharma, J.) Present: Shri B.L. Dembra, Advocate for the applicant. Shri V.C. Ottalwar, Advocate for the respondent No. 1. Shri U.K.S. Chandel, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the respondent No. 2. B/- ORDER (Passed on 7th April, 2Q08) This revision is directed against the order dated 10.1.2006 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (F.T.C.), Kabirdham (Kawardha) in Criminal Revision No. 38/2005 setting aside the order dated 14.9.2005 passed by the Judicial lli4agistrate First Class, Kawardha in Criminal Case No. 282/05 and awarded maintenance of Rs. 500/- per month to the respondent No.1. Learned counsel appearing for the applieant submits that the applicant died and thus, the revision has bscome infructuous. Consequentiy, the revision is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge •aB,.i*^lalUtABiBe«iil!lilt^BS»'| ||BBj|j