IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.22 of 2009 UMESH PRASAD YADAV,SON OF LATE LAXMI YADAV, R/V GURIYA TOLA, VIDYANAGAR, P.S. JADIYA, DISTT. SUPAUL--- PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE DARBHANGA, RANGE, DARBHANGA 4. THE DIVISIONAL INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE SAHARSA 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SUPAUL 6. MR. MANISH KUMAR SINHA, THE DY.S.P. TRIVENIGANJ---- RESPONDENTS ----------- For the petitioner:- Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State:- Government Pleader No.IX 2 10.2.2009 It is the assertion of the petitioner that warrant of arrest issued against respondent no.6 is not being executed only on the ground that he happens to be a Police Officer. Having heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha, for the petitioner,Government Pleader No.IX for the State and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that petitioner shall be well advised to bring this fact to the notice of respondent no.5, the Superintendent of Police,Supaul. Needless to state that in case the aforesaid fact is brought to the notice of respondent no.5 aforesaid, he shall take appropriation action in accordance with law without unnecessary delay. Any deviation in carrying out this order, shall be - 2 - viewed seriously. It is made clear that I have not expressed any opinion in regard to the claim made by the petitioner and that shall be considered by respondent no.5 in accordance with law. Application stands disposed off with the observation aforesaid. (Chandramauli Kr.Prasad,ACJ.) A.,kumar