IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. -M No. 21775 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 9.8.2011 Parmod Kumar @ Sunny ..Petitioner. Vs. State of Punjab ..Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present : Mr. K.D.S. Sodhi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Rajesh Bindal, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that all injuries attributed to the petitioner were found to be simple. The only non-bailable offence in the present case is of trespass i.e. under Section 452 IPC. He further submitted that the matter in dispute has been settled between the parties. The factum of settlement of dispute has been ascertained by the Investigating Officer. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petitioner is directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on 18.8.2011 at 10 A.M. for joining investigation. In case of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer. He shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called upon for further investigation. He shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands disposed of. ( Rajesh Bindal ) 9.8.2011 Judge Meenu