IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH AUGUST 2011 / 19TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 24898 of 2006(L) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.P.PURUSHOTHAMAN, S/O.NARYANAN.K., PUTHANPURAYIL HOUSE, ERUVATTI POST, VIA KATHIRUR, THALASSERI. (NOW WORKING AS CLERK IN SENIOR DME OFFICE, CPRC SECTION, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, RAILWAYS, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.SANTHEEP ANKARATH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CHIEF SECURITY COMMISSIONER, RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE, SOUTHERN RAILWAY. 2. THE DIVISIONAL SECURITY COMMISSIONER, RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE, PALAKKAD. 3. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE. 4. THE ACCOUNTS OFFICER, RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE. 5. DIVISIONAL PERSONAL OFFICER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, PALAKKAD. ADV. SRI.ALEXANDER THOMAS, SC,RAILWAYS FOR R1TO5 SRI.V.K.MOHAMMED YOUSUF FOR R1-5 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 24898 of 2006(L) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: COPY OF LETTER DATED 4.7.2002. EXT.P2: COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 25-11-2003. EXT.P3: COPY OF REPLY DATED 26-4-04. EXT.P4; COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 26-8-2005. EXT.P5: COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 10-11-2005. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS EXT.R1: COPY OF PROCEEDINGS NO.94/SEC(E)/RSKN/6 DT.12-8-2004. EXT.R2: COPY OF RAILWAY BOARD'S LETTER NO.2004/SEC(E)/RSKN DATED 14-9-2004. EXT.R3: COPY OF RAILWAY BOARD'S LETTER NO.2002/SEC(E)/A1-2/1/ DECATEGORISED STAFF DT. 31-3-2006. EXT.R4; COPY OF RAILWAY BOARD'S LETTER NO.2002/SEC(E)/A1-2/1 DECATEGORISED STAFF DT 16-5-2006. TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE. acd S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.24898 OF 2006 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner was a Constable in the Railway Protection Force. He met with an accident and was certified to be unfit for the work of a Constable. Thereafter, the petitioner was given employment as Clerk. According to the petitioner, the petitioner has been denied ration money, leave encashment and benefits from the Railway Sevak Kalyan Nidhi. Seeking this benefit, the petitioner has filed Ext.P5 representation before the 3rd respondent. The petitioner seeks a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 expeditiously. 2. I have heard the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents also. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE acd