IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Interim Relief Application No.2933 of 2010 In Writ Petition No. 598 of 2010 (M/S) Smt. Jyoti Mehra Negi ……Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and six others. ….Respondents. Mr. Pradeep Hariya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Addl. C.S.C. for the State-respondents. Dated: -27-04-2010 Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to amend the prayer. Permission granted. The necessary amendment be carried out during the course of the day. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to permit the petitioner to get the admission in the B.T.C. training course, commencing from 26-4-2010 to 28-4-2010. The grievance of the petitioner is that she had applied for the issuance of permanent residence certificate of District-Bageshwar in the year 2006 before her marriage. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the report was submitted by the Patwari, Khatti Gaon, District- 2 Bageshwar on 22-01-2010 to the Up-Zila Adhikari, Tehsil- Kanda, District-Bageshwar but no decision has been taken so far. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the respondent No.7 is directed to take decision on the application of the petitioner within a period of one week from the date of production of certified copy of this order in accordance with law. The petitioner is also directed that she shall produce the certified copy of this order before the respondent No.7 within three days. Till the decision is taken by the respondent No.7 on the application of the petitioner for issuance of permanent residence certificate, the respondent No.5 is directed to keep one seat vacant for admission in the B.T.C. Training course. It is further directed that the respondent No.7 shall also inform to the respondent No.5 whether the certificate has been granted in her favour or not, after decision is taken on the application. With the said observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. The certified copy of this order be supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioner today on the payment of usual charges. (B.S.Verma, J.) 27-04-2010 MK