IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 1928 of 2008 Between: M/s. Integrated Geo Instruments and SErvices Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, Sri K.R. Ramanujachary, S/o. K.Jagannadhachary, R/o.12-13-382, Street No.18, Tarnaka, Hyderabad - 500 017. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Hyderabad Urban Development Authority (HUDA) Rep. by its Chairman, Hyderabad. 2 The Resource and Development Officer, HUDA 1-8-323, Paigah Palace, Rasool Pura, Secunderabad - 003. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the inaction on the part of the respondents in not taking possession of shop No.70, HUDA Complex, Tarnaka, Hyderabad, as per the letter sent by the petitioner dated 15.4.2006 is highly arbitrary, unjust and unfair and violative of Article 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to take possession of the shop No.70 HUDA Complex, Tarnaka, Hyderabad. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.PARAVASTU KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents: (SC FOR HUDA)M.SURENDER RAO The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1928 of 2008 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition reserving liberty to the petitioner to workout his remedy available in the Civil Court. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty to the petitioner to workout his remedy in the Civil Court. No order as to costs. ________________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY,J 31.07.2008 v v