IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12728 of 2008 1.SAVITA KUMARI daughter of Sri Shyam Sunder Singh Resident of Vilage Meharpur P.S.Shambhuganj District Banka. 2.Chaya Kumari daughter of Nareshand Thakur resident Of village Jhakhera P.S.Shambhuganj Dist.Banka Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary, Department of Human Resources,Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.The Secretary,Department of Human Resources, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.The Director, Primary Education,Bihar,Patna. 4.The District Magistrate,Banka 5.The District Superintendent of Education,Banka 6.The Block Development Officer,Shambhuganj,Banka 7.The Mukhiya,Gram Panchayat,Jhakhara,Shambhuganj Banka. 8.The Panchayat Secretary,Gram Panchayat Jhakhara, Shambhuganj,Banka. 9.Kumari July Rai wife of Sri Santosh Kumar Suman Daughter of Sri Navdeweep Chand Rai, resident of Sotichak P.S.Shambhuganj,Dist.Banka. 10.Nitya Nand Roy, son of Late Fauzdari Roy,resident Of Nayagaon P.S.Parbatta Dist.Khagaria 11.Reena Kumari wife of Sri Manoj Kumar Das daughter of Sri Mahendra Das,resident of Muluktand,P.S.Haveli Kharagpur,Dist. Munger. 12.Meena Kumari wife of Sri Ranjit Chaudhary daughter Of Sri Uma Kant Choudhary,resident of Jhakhara P.S. Shambhuganj District Banka. 13.Leena Kumari wife of Sri Dharmendra Chaudhary Daughter of Sri Amarendra Singh, resident of Jhakhara P.S.Shambhuganj Dist. Banka. 14.Bandana Kumari daughter of Sri Binay Ssingh, Block Education Extension Officer,Shambhuganj District Banka. ----------- 2 19.2.2009. Heard counsel for the petitioners and the State. Earlier C.W.J.C.No.11643 of 2007 was filedin which the petitioners were the persons who were appointed as Panchayat teachers, but their services were terminated on the basis of ex-parte enquiry. The enquiry was conducted without giving them opportunity. The writ application was allowed, direction was issued to the respondents to re-enquire the matter after giving opportunity to the petitioners and to the interested persons. 2 As per direction of this Court fresh enquiry was conducted in which the persons who were terminated from service and the persons who had any grievance against selection of the petitioner in C.W.J.C.No.11643 of 2007 were noticed. they participated in the enquiry. Consequent to that an order has been passed which is under challenge (Annexure-1) Petitioners in this writ application are claiming that they have got higher marks, but persons with lower marks have been found to be selected genuinely. Such matters cannot be decided by a writ court because it will need verification of the records, which can be done at the local level. Under 2008 Rule, tribunal is empowered to decide such matters. Petitioners, if so advised, may move before the tribunal for redressal of their grievances, which should be considered and decided within eight weeks of petitioners approaching the tribunal. Accordingly this application is disposed of. Sss/- (Mridula Mishra, J)