THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 23786 of 2008 Oral order: Aggrieved by the inaction of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in not issuing notices under Section 452 and 636 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 to respondent Nos. 3 and 4 with respect to the illegal constructions being made by them in the premises in question, they filed the writ petition. This Court by order dated 03.11.2008 while ordering notice before admission, granted interim directions to respondent No.1 to depute one of his subordinate officers to the premises where respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are proceeding with the constructions and verify whether the constructions are in accordance with the sanctioned plan and submit a report by the next date of adjournment. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Standing Counsel for the official respondent Nos. 1 and 2 submitted the Assistant City Planner, Circle X, GHMC, inspected the site, as directed by this Court, and produced the report submitted by him. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel for official respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and the learned counsel for the private respondents. The report dated 20.01.2009, submitted by the Assistant City Planner, Circle X, GHMC, is as follows: The site bearing premises No. 8-2-740/20/1 falls in the notified slum of Bhola Nagar, First Lancer, Banjara Hills. It is observed that the site is consisting with Ground Floor and First Floor with A.C. sheet room seems to be constructed long back. The entire locality of this Bhola Nagar is an unauthorized colony, which were made on the pattas issued by the government to the poor people. Further, it is revealed from the site, there is a civil dispute between the complainant Sri. Mohd. Jeelani Pasha and the owner of the said site Sri Zaheer. It is observed that there is a 4’ to 6’ seri between Sri Jeelani Pasha and other houses which is facing to 20’-00” wide existing road which links to Road No. 12. Whereas, the Sri Zaheer Ahmed is residing at the back of the complainant Sri Jeelani to use the seri and obstructing the seri from using by the general public residing at the back of complainant, for which, he has made the complaint as alleging some unauthorized construction been taken up by Sri Zaheer. But in fact no unauthorized construction has been observed at the site. Further, they have made the suits in the Hon’ble Courts with regard to the seri. From the above report, it is clearly observed that there is no construction activity is found at site. Moreover, the site under reference falls in the notified slum and all the constructions are made unatuthorizedly. From a reading of the above, it would become clear that both the petitioners as well as respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are residing at a place called Bhola Nagar, which is said to be an unauthorized colony. It appears that that there are certain civil disputes between the petitioners and respondent Nos. 3 and 4. The report denies making of any unauthorized constructions by respondent Nos. 3 and 4, as alleged by the petitioners in the writ petition, and in fact, reports that there are no unauthorized constructions being made. In view of the above, no relief as prayed for by the petitioners can be granted. The writ petition is devoid of merit, and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 20th January, 2009 KSR