•[¥S. EN THE HIGH COURT 0F SIKKIM ORDER SHEET Crl.Misc. Case Gaurav She]char State of Sikkim Versus NO. 1 Ofrd/ 2003 Petitioner/Appellant Respondent Serial No. of Order 6.3.2003 Order with Signature Present : Mr. Bimal Kumar, Senior Advocate with M. 8. Sharma, M. Anurag Kumar and M. Dineshwar Mishra, Advocates for the petitioner. M. N. 8. Khatiwada, Addl.Public Prosecutor with Mr. J. 8. Pradhan, Govt.Advocate and M.Karma Thinlay, Asstt.Govt.Advocate for the State. Heard the leaned Counsel for the petitioner on admission. The application is entirely misconceived. Dismissed in limine. It appears that the application has been filed only to delay the pro6eedings before the trial court. It is mentioned by the learned trial court in the order sheet of 11.2.2003 that the applicant has been praying for adjournment on the ground of illness almost on each and every date. On 25.3.2003, a statement was made before the trial court to the effect that this Msc.Case has been filed before the High .Court. The application had been 'filed before the High Court on 24.3.2003. We also find from the order sheet that the witnesses were sent back without being examined on account of the request for adjouminent on behalf of the applicant. Learned trial court should not have been so indulgent in granting adjournments. The trial court shall proceed with the case very expeditiously. a,Li •'(,: uty]a#gn:Singh) 26.3.2003 N ( N. S, + . .I,,.fwl ( Rlpusudan Dayal ) ChiofJustice 26.3.2003 Office Note as to aa!:ILO:Ii8:3g,i 44£7~dy7#d"/f;