IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6313 of 2011 1. TILAK DHARI CHOUDHARY @ KARU CHOUDHARY SON OF MUNDRIKA CHOUDHARY. 2. RUKMANI DEVI W/O TILAK DHARI CHOUDHARY @ KARU CHOUDHARY. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 29.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners being the parents of the husband are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 323, 307, 498A, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Though, there is allegation of demand of Rs. one lakh and a motorcycle, for which, torture was inflicted, but, it appears that the complainant was ready to reside in her matrimonial house. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instruction, submits that they will not object the complainant to reside in her matrimonial house and shall file an affidavit to that effect before the learned court below. Considering the aforesaid stands of the 2 petitioners, let the above named petitioners, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Complaint Case No. 1412/2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)