AB 284/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE K.MERUNO Heard Mr. B.D.Konwar, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and also Mr. B.S.Sinha, learned Addl.P.P, appearing for the State. By this application , the petitioner Shri Sanjoy Deb Roy has prayed for granting pre-arrest bail in connection with Silchar P.S. Case No. 2200/2010 under Secti on 406/420 IPC ( G.R. No. 4201/2010 ) It is submitted that a complaint was filed by three complainants, namely 1. Sri Amar Krishna Biswas, 2. Hussain Ahmed Choudhury and 3. Sahabuddin to the exte nt that the petitioner/ accused Shri Sanjoy Deb Roy induced the complainants to make deposit of Rs.300, Rs,1500/- and Rs 3000/- to Manash Multitrade ( P) Ltd . Regd. & Head Office : Pathsala, Assam. When the money deposited by the compla inants were not paid to them, they approached the accused for the payment. Howe ver, the accused No. 1 fixed a number of dates for making full payment but the same was not done. The complainants when in search of the accused found the off ice was locked up and the complainants understood that the accused persons have induced them and deceived by embezzling the deposit money and have absconded . Left with no other option, the complainant has filed a complaint. The petitione r portray himself to be innocent to the whole episode has approached this Court for granting pre-arrest bail. Mr. B.D.Konwar, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he is in no way involved in the said transaction because it is the Company afo resaid who has taken money and have paid back the dues to the complainants. Howe ver, being a retired person, he undertakes that if the Manash Multitrade ( P) Lt d. fails to make payment to the said complainants, he is ready and willing to pa y the amount due to the three complainants. Considering this voluntary undertaking given by the petitioner, I would c onsider to dispose of this bail application with the conditions that if the sai d Company namely Manash Multitrade ( P) Ltd. fails to release the amount due to the three complainants undertakes that he shall make the recovery to the three complainants and the said complainants shall produce proper receipt to the peti tioner enable to make payment.The said complainants and their documents in proof shall also be indetified by an Advocate of the Bar. The whole process should be completed within a period of 3 months from the date, the said Company fails to make good the payment of the three complainants. Consequently, it is provided that the petitioner above named in the event of arr est by the I.O, he shall be released on bail of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority in connection wi th Silchar P.S. Case No. 2200/2010 under Section 406/420 IPC (G.R. No. 4201/201 0 ). With the above directions, this bail application stands allowed and di sposed of.