1 Prash FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7875 OF 2008 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri V.S. Gokhale for the Petitioner. Shri Divekar i/by M/s. Divekar & Co. for Respondent No.1. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 10TH MARCH, 2010 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. The impugned order was passed at a stage when the suit was fixed for arguments and for final judgment. The order being interlocutory in nature is capable of being challenged in an appeal which may be preferred by the Petitioner if the decree passed in the suit be adverse to the Petitioner. Subject to what is observed above, no case for interference at this stage is made out. The Petition is rejected. 2. It is, however, clarified that it will be open for the Petitioner to apply for amendment for impleading the 4th Respondent as party Defendant to the suit. (A.S.OKA, J)