BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Sixth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.PALANIVELU CRL OP(MD) No.12855 of 2011 RAVI ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 Vs THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE GANESH NAGAR POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI CRIEM NO. 414/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.P.RAMACHANTHIRAN Advocate For Respondent :Mr.A.RAMAR,Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 420, 294(b) and 506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.414 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was charged under Sections 420, 294(b) and 506 (ii) of I.P.C. He further submitted that the petitioner is innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that A1 and A3 were already granted Anticipatory Bail by the learned Principle Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai in Crl.M.P.No.1628 & 1760 of 2011 and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that this petitioner is arrayed as A2. A1 and A3 are the real estate owners and they made arrangement to sell a land to the complainant with one Peri.Ganapthi and received a sum of Rs.16,00,000/- from the de-facto complainant and the investigation is considerably over and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that the accused Nos.1 and 3 were already granted anticipatory bail by the Principle Sessions Court, Pudukkottai and the investigation is considerably over https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ and even though the petitioner was not arrested, neither he interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pudukkottai and on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 26/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PUDUKOTTAI 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE GANESH NAGAR POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI +1. CC to M/S. R.P.RAMACHANTHIRAN Advocate SR.No.33590 rl/6c – 29.9.2011 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12855 of 2011 Date :26/09/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/