IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8796 of 2007 Upendra Singh son of late Shiv Nandan Singh, resident of village Saria Tola, Mathurapur, P.O. + P.S. Kurtha, District Arwal, … .. Petitioner Versus 1. The Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, 2. The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, 3. The Inspector of College (Science), Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, 4. The Principal, Sahid Jagdeo Asmarak College, Kurtha, .. … Respondents For the Petitioner: Mr. Gopal Goving Mishra, Advocate For the M.U. : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate ---------------------------------- 5 07.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent nos. 1 to 3. Petitioner seeks direction commanding the respondent authorities to accept the recommendation of the auditor regarding donation of the land in favour of the Governor of the State of Bihar vide registered deed no. 9389 dated 07.08.1985, which, according to the petitioner, would be of about Rs. 1,50,000/-. However, the matter is pending for approval before the Syndicate though building of a college, namely, Saheed Jagdeo smarak College, Kurtha has already been constructed upon the land donated by the petitioner but the formalities regarding approval of the donation has not been completed by the 2 syndicate as per the requirement under the Statute relating to declaration of the donors in affiliated college, which has been brought on record as Annexure 2. However, the petitioner submits that that a representation has been given to the Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, respondent no. 1, but no step has been taken in this regard as yet. A copy of the representation has been appended as part of Annexure 4 series. In above view of the matter, this writ application is being disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, respondent no. 1. If such step is taken then let the representation filed by the petitioner be considered in accordance with law within three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court has not formed any opinion on merit of the case of the petitioner. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)