IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 17692 of 2008 Date of Decision: 04.10.2008 Dinesh Goel ..Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.THAKUR,CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT Present : Mr. Rakesh Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioner **** T.S.Thakur, C.J. (Oral) Issue notice of motion to respondent No.2, Ms.Madhu Dayal accepts notice. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case the Deputy Commissioner, respondent No.2 in this petition, is directed to look into the representation dated 15.9.2008 in terms of Annexure P-4 made by the petitioner to him and to take appropriate steps to prevent any untoward incident arising out of lack of security in and around the BRS Nagar at Ludhiana. Ms. Madhu Dayal, has no objection to the matter being disposed of with the direction prayed for by the petitioner. In the circumstances, therefore, we dispose of this writ petition with the direction that the Deputy Commissioner, Ludhiana, respondent No.2 in the writ petition, shall examine the representation made to him by the petitioner in terms of Annexure P-4 and take all such steps as are necessary to prevent any untoward incident in the area in question. No costs. (T.S.THAKUR) CHIEF JUSTICE (SURYA KANT) 04.10.2008 JUDGE 'ravinder'