IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.29699 of 2011 Subhash Manjhi Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 02. 20.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the informant is also present. Kidnapping of informant’s sister is corroborated by the victim also adding committing rape upon her also after taking her to Delhi. F. I. R. is based on a written complaint in which motive for kidnapping is shown to marry with petitioner’s son co-accused Anil Kumar. This statement (statement of victim) has been recorded after coming in contact of her family members. Her statement is not clear on the point whether she was taken to Delhi by one or by all the accused persons. Rape, if, was committed by one or all accused persons including female accused. Her age has been assessed 17 years by the Magistrate, which is so disclosed by her (victim) also. In the F.I.R. She has been shown sixteen and half years and submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that both families were closed to each other, victim girl had some affair with accused No.1. Both disappeared and now it appears to me to justify the disappearance and to save the honour of the family, this statement is made by the victim lady involving all the family members. Accordingly, let the above named petitioner be 2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Garkha P. S. Case No.261 of 2010. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)