HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH C.R.P.No.5667 of 2010 Date: 18-03-2011 Between: P.V. Narasinga Rao …….Petitioner and The Sub-Registrar, Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam and others ……….. Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH C.R.P.No.5667 of 2010 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the order, dated 30-06-2010 passed in I.A.No.546 of 2008 in O.S.No.105 of 1998 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge at Bheemunipatnam. The petitioner, who is the plaintiff, filed the suit in O.S.No.105 of 1998 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge at Bheemunipatnam for the relief of permanent injunction. The said suit was dismissed for default on 06-03-2006. To set aside the default order, dated 06-03-2006, an application under Order 9 Rule 9 of C.P.C. was sought to be filed and in this connection there is delay of 807 days in filing the application and therefore, the petitioner filed another application in I.A.No.546 of 2008 under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the said delay in filing the application under Order 9 Rule 9 of C.P.C. The Court below dismissed the application through the order, dated 30-08-2010 on the ground that the reason shown by the petitioner was not cogent and the petition was devoid of merits. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material on record. Admittedly, the suit was dismissed for default on 06-03-2006 and the petitioner filed the said application after lapse of almost 2 ½ years i.e., on 24-06-2008 contending that he came to know about the dismissal of the suit only on 06-03-2006 and he is neither willful nor negligent in attending the Court and in view of his innocence and the lack of knowledge, he could not attend the Court on the previous adjournment dates. Even if it is a fact that the petitioner came to know about the dismissal of the suit only on 06-03-2006, I am of the opinion that absolutely no reason much less sufficient cause has been shown for condonation of the inordinate delay of 807 days in filing the application under Order 9 Rule 9 of C.P.C. and therefore, the Court below has rightly dismissed the application. The Revision Petition is devoid of merits. The Civil Revision Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. No order as to costs. _______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J Date: 18-03-2011 YCR