IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR MONDAY, THE 9TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 18TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 31118 of 2009(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- NEETHU SUKUMARAN, AGED 21, D/O.N.K.SUKUMARAN, RESIDING AT NANATTY HOUSE, KODAKARA, KODAKARA.P.O, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, TRICHUR. BY ADV. SRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY SRI.ADEEP ANWAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, (HOME DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THRISSUR. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KODAKARA POLICE STATION. 4. SUMESH.K.G, AGED 30, S/O.GOPI, KALLUMADA HOUSE, KUTTICHIRA, KUTTICHIRA.P.O, THRISSUR. 5. SUDHEESH.K.G, S/O.GOPI, KALLUMADA HOUSE, KUTTICHIRA, KUTTICHIRA.P.O, THRISSUR. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS -R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.C.NO.31118 OF 2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER's EXHIBITS: Ext.P1: True photostat copy of the complaint dated 05.08.2009 before the 2nd respondent. Ext.P2: True photostat copy of the petition dated 29.10.2009 submitted before the 2nd respondent. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ. --------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.31118 OF 2009 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of November, 2009 JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph, J. The petitioner and 4th respondent are wife and husband respectively. The 5th respondent is the brother of petitioner's husband. The petitioner complains of harassment by the respondents as well as the police. We find that the petitioner has already approached the Family Court, Thrissur. Since the relationship between the petitioner and 4th respondent is strained and since the parties are already before the Family Court and particularly since the 4th respondent is in Gulf, it will not be possible for this Court to go into various allegations raised in the Writ Petition. The petitioner and 5th respondent are present. The 5th respondent submits that there will not be any room for harassment or complaint on his part. The learned Government Pleader also submits that since the petitions are before the Family Court, the police does not want to interfere in the family disputes. In that view of the matter, it is not necessary for the police to pursue the W.P.(C) NO.31118 of 2009 2 man missing case. There will be a direction to the police to close the investigation or further actions on the complaint filed by the 4th respondent alleging that the petitioner was missing. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the police. (KURIAN JOSEPH) JUDGE (C.T. RAVIKUMAR) JUDGE spc