IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.29225 of 2011 Bindeshwari Prasad (Block Development Officer ,Teghara) Versus The State Of Bihar ---------- 02 14.09.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, Vigilance and the State. This is repeat application filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking anticipatory bail in a case instituted under diverse Sections of Prevention of Corruption Act. Earlier the petitioner had moved this Court for anticipatory bail which was considered and rejected by this Court by order dated 26.05.2011 (Annexure-1) in the following manner:- “In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not persuaded to privilege the petitioner with anticipatory bail. His prayer for anticipatory bail stands rejected. Let the petitioner surrender and apply for regular bail which shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law uninfluenced by the present order.” Petitioner has again approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail. It is contended that the L.T.Is appended on the application of Kitawari Devi and Phulo Devi are not the L.T.Is of those two persons. Learned counsel made diverse submissions in support of the aforesaid stand. However, considering the fact that his application was rejected on merit, this Court is not inclined to opine any view thereon. Let petitioner surrender before the Court below and apply for bail which shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law uninfluenced by the present order as quickly as possible. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)