IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(St No. ^e^ / 2006 ^ f ^i PETITIONER ^%c -y- y ^" RESPONDENTS c\y" ^ -v^- ^£?frS'S"^ Smt. Anju Soni, W/o. Shri Rajkumar soni, aged about 50 years, Head Master, Govt. Middle School- Block Colony - Kondagaon, Block - Kondagaon, Distt. - (Bastar) (C.G.) VERSUS ^l > State of Chhattisgarh & Others Through- The Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Distt. -Jagdalpur ( Bastar) (C.G. WRJT PETmONJLJNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE DIRECTION ETC TO DQ JUSTICE IN THE hflATTER. HI6H COURT OP CHHATTIS6ARH AT ttOASPUIt SIN6LE BENCH : HON^LE «R. SATISH K A6NIHOTRI. J. Petitioner WRTT PETmtON fS IN0.7104 OF 2006 PushprojSingh versus %8SDondents StntB of ChhattJS9arh and o-thers Petitjoner WRTT PETmON fS 1 N0 7108 OF 2006 Sciiyyud Ahmad Zasmed Rizvi versus Respondents : Stnrte of Chhattisgarhflnd others WRTT PETTTION fS ) N0.7107 OF 2006 Petitiorier versus Reapondents Basnnt Vumwr Oiauhan State of Chhattis9arh ond o'thers x' WiaTPETTTEONfS.l N0.7108 OF 2006 Petitioner : Abdul Latif Meman I. ' versus Respondents : Storte of Chhatf-fegarh ando'thers WMT PETTTION (S.) N0.7109 OF 2006 Petitiorwr : Smt. Anju Soni versus Resoondehts Starte of Chhcttisgarh and others Petitioner WKTT PETmON (S ) N0 7110 OF 2006 Smt. Aijerii Scwant Bandhey versus Reapondents Stute of Chhcrttisgarh and others Petitigner WMT PETTTIONfSl N0.7111 OF 2006 : AjoyKumarNag versus Respondents : State of ChhaM'isgarh and others WRTT PETTTION f5.1 N0.7119 OF Z006 Petitioner ; RB^jeshPandey versus Reapondents : Slute of Chhattisgarh and others j WRIT PETTTION (5.1 N0.7148 OF 2006 1 . PetHwneiJ : Smt. AnitaVndav versus tespondents State of Chhattfcsgarh cnd others WRTT PETmON (S) N0 7149 OF 2006 i; . • • ' . . .' ' Petitioner : AAon9hRcBn Poyam wsrays Respondents Ptetitkmcr : Stnte of Chhtrttisgarh and o-thers And WMT PETmON (S.) N0.7180 OF 2006 : Anend Saha versys ftesponderits : StntB of ChhcrttiS9arh and o-thers Present : ^Ar. A.S. Rajput, counsel for'rt)epetitioner(s). Smt. Anju Ahuja,t)eputy Sovemment Advocate for the State/respondents. OltOER (Passed on Ihis 21** ctay of Oecember, 2006) Leamed counset flppeurin9 forthe petitioners ond also for the Stute/respondents jomtly submit that the facts and question of kiw involved in ttw preauTl' writ petitions are aquorely cowred by ihe decision of •this Cowt in •Ifie cnse of yMlwvmt Kinwr Wwrwliwj v». Mw^tS CarpopaHan. t)wy ewl anttrtw^. Subhash 2. For •tfie aforementioned neasons, the writ petHions are disposed i i • ' • •"••.'• of in terms of •the decisiwi of •this Court' m •the matter of %tai^»w»^ Kumew aradwc{/ (Siyro), subject to verification of 1+ie fact as to fnhelher the petitioners haw acquired B.Ed. Cerlificates at •fhth' oim I- . ' . . • • .. expenses oSr per -the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and l-3-1999 cnd 1 . ' • . . . '• ' . 1 further whether •they hove been paid two advonce hicrements or not. No order as to costs. I, . • •• . • • 3. A copy of ihis order be ptaced on the record of •the co»mected writ pctition^. Sd/- sat»hK.Ag^h^ Judge 1, 2006(11) MPJR-C6 96 ")-•