gai^ Saiit Kum.ar KacJ'icliliap, s/o Rasuraai, aged about 39 yesu-s, R/o tsec.d, yiocK-1, Kooia INo. l/, Kaslitrsjii Magar, Raipur, Distt. A \ £^Li.^/ ^a.A. ^ \^/ T <-^ ^ » ^ 1 State ot CIiliattisgarli: Through Sscrsta"f, Jaasaaipark Saiichanaya laya, U.K.y, Btiawan, Maiitralaya, Raipru-jC.G). 2 Director, Jaasainparlc yailcJiaaalaya r\ v Q rsT^^^T-^n. "fiff^m+^^i^iTrn i?>^^^-m^ 1-f . A^i l^i. i_/JL^<-S.r^ Ci-t-Ay J.VA<..U_i(.t^t.iC.U.</tJ C4.) ^'ii.^-l.^-' <-<.A (C.fcrj. STtTION rILBD UNDBK ARTICLB 2-<6 OP THjS r'niuaTi'rini'iniur r>B' Twnta Snri K.aiyan Kalamkar, counsel tbr the petitioner. Sint. Sniim Giiai, P. L. appears lor the State on advance copy. "4.Q7.20081 'l'tie peGUoner wno is worteuig on t&e post ot Assistailt Grade-ill Iias been transterred froin Raipur to Bnapur (Bastarj. Leamed counsel tbr the petitioner argues that fhis is a 3rd ti'an.sfer of the petiuoner wiuiia a penod ot' one year. He reters to Uie eartier orders tiled as Annexure P-2 aiid P-3, A perusal ot Annexure P-2 would sliow ttiat it was a proiuotion order aiid alter proiuotuig ttie petitioner, tie was posted at a particular place. As tar as Annexui'e P-3 is concerued, it appears that it was a traaster at the request ot tlie petitioner IiunseU' on his own expenses. 'l'heretbre, no case of victunization on frequent traiisters is inade out in case of the petitioner. ^^M" 1^3^' B8B [SS^^ i^:S^N E;^$^i 1^^^ ssai KSa ^•^;^^?^ !SS9 -^••:s^.'^ IKSi tui-?E'ie^ IfiB 'S^MS sss ssa ais M•iH III 118— B &s?^ IBSII ^j^ ^^— B • • M^ 8BIIII y Trauster is an uiciaence o( service. iNo persou workuig on a translerable post can claira to be posted at a particuJai- place. Itis tbr toe eniployer to see ttiat who stiould be posted. wnere ia Uie uiterest ot better tunctioiuiig ot the departme.at as a-lso iii uie pubuc iiiteregt. lt is ttie settled view ot ttie Apex Court that uniess ttie order ot traiister 1s vitiated by inalatide or extraneous consicterations or is agauist any statutoiy Kules or Act, it cajuiot be interfered by a Court of Law. In view of ttie above, 1 do not tind aiiv reason to ttitertere witti tlie order ot traiisfer. Tbe penuon deseives to be aild. is accorcliagly clisruissect. At this stage, Shri Kaianikar subniits that ttie petmoner has tiled a representation and it inay be dit'ected that the authonty m.ay dispose ot Uie i-epresentation in accorclauce witil law. It is observed tbat Uie au'tLorities are tree to dispose of flie repi'esentation tiled by the petitioner and uus oi-der sliail not com.e in me way ot tafcmp any decision in the inatter of representatioii ot tlie petitioner, which shall be decided by ttie conceraea autlionty on its owa iiient.s. Wlm th.e above observation, thls petition stands disposed ot at tfae niotion stage itsett. Sd/- SunU Kumar Sinha Judge 'tal KOO