IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3047 of 2011 1. SITA SUNDRI DEVI 2. RANJU DEVI @ RANJU KUMARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 14.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Admittedly, petitioner no.2 is wife whereas petitioner no.1 is mother-in-law of the deceased. It is stated that on the alleged date of occurrence deceased had gone to the house of petitioners to bring petitioner no.2 back to his home, but allegedly he was poisoned to death. The impugned order of learned Additional Sessions Judge, 2nd, Patna reveals that in course of investigation several stories had come, and subsequently, police submitted charge sheet against the petitioners. The contention of learned counsel for petitioners is that the informant had bad eyes on petitioner no.2 and the petitioner no.2 left her matrimonial home and started residing at her natal place. He further submitted that after death of husband of petitioner no.2, the informant taking advantage of the above stated death lodged this false 2 case. Although, learned counsel appearing for informant opposed the bail application pointing out this fact that the family members of petitioners have given threatening to the informant to withdraw the above stated case and for which Shigori P.S. Case no.40 of 2010 has been registered, but considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions of the parties, I think it proper to grant privilege of bail to the petitioners, accordingly, petitioners, namely, (1) Sita Sundri and (2) Ranju Devi @ Ranju Kumari are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Danapur in connection with Paliganj P.S. Case No.247 of 2009. PN (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)