CRM No.23037 of 2010 in/and -1- CRR No.1240 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.M. No.23037 of 2010 in/and C.R.R. No.1240 of 2010 Date of Decision : 11.03.2011 Promala Devi ……Petitioner Versus State of Punjab …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI -.- Present: Mr. N.S. Sodhi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Chandumajra, D.A.G., Punjab. *** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) C.R.M. No.23037 of 2010 For the reasons recorded, delay of 11 days in filing the revision is condoned. CRM No.23037 of 2010 in/and -2- CRR No.1240 of 2010 Application stands allowed. C.R.R. No.1240 of 2010 This is a revision against the order dated 15.01.2010 rejecting the application of the petitioner for releasing of vehicle in question on superdari. Learned trial Court declined the superdari since at that time the petitioner was not the registered owner of the vehicle in question. However, as per learned counsel for the petitioner now the petitioner has become the registered owner and that earlier she was not the registered owner because the instalments had not been cleared. This fact has been accepted by the learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. In the circumstances, the revision is allowed. The order dated 15.01.2010 is set aside. It is directed that the vehicle in question be released to the petitioner on superdari to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. ( AJAY TEWARI ) March 11, 2011 JUDGE ashish