1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6422 OF 2007 Deccan Flour Mills Ltd. Paithan Road, Aurangabad .. .. Petitioner Versus 1. The Municipal Corporation Aurangabad and another .. .. Respondents Shri P. N. Sonpethkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri A. M. Karad, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. Shri S. V. Kurundkar, Addl.G.P. for the Respondent No. 2. CORAM : A. P. DESHPANDE & N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 17TH FEBRUARY, 2010. ORAL ORDER [ PER A. P. DESHPANDE, J. ] : 1. By the present petition the petitioner is claiming compensation on account of acquisition of its land by the respondent No. 1/Corporation. It is also undisputed that the petitioner had made an application claiming T.D.R. from the Corporation on account of acquisition of the land. Learned counsel for the 2 respondent No. 1 on instructions from Assistant Director of Town Planning of Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad makes statement that Corporation would consider the application moved by the petitioner making a claim for grant of T.D.R. and take a decision in accordance with law. 2. In view of the said statement made by learned counsel for the respondent No. 1, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [ A. P. DESHPANDE, J.] bsb/Feb. 2010