IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7294 of 2005 NAND KISHORE PRASAD VERMA, SON OF LATE MUNSHI DEO NATH SAHAY, RESIDENT OF MANORMA BHAWAN, BLOCK COLONY, P.O. +P.S. AND DISTRICT – AURANGABAD. Versus THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN OFFICIATING AT BIDUAT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD , PATNA 2. CHAIRMAN BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATNA 3. SECRETARY, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD , PATNA 4. THE FINANCIAL CONTROLLER BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATNA 5. THE GENERAL MANAGER-CUM-CHIEF ENGINEER MAGADH ELECTRIC SUPPLY AREA BOARD, B.S.E.B., B.S.E.B., GAYA 6. THE ELECTRICAL SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, ELECTRIC SUPPLY CIRCLE, B.S.E.B. GAYA 7.THE ELECTRICAL EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRIC SUPPLY DIVISION, B.S.E.B., GAYA ----------- 3. 04.05.2009 A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents stating therein details with regard to the payments of the retiral dues, copy of which has been served to the counsel for the petitioner today in court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on verification, if any amount appears to be unpaid, the petitioner be given liberty to file representation before the respondent no. 7 with regard to any claimed amount unpaid within a period of four weeks alongwith certified copy of the present order. In case such representation is filed, the respondent no. 7 shall consider and dispose of - 2 - the same by a reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. Upon such consideration, if the representation is disposed of in favour of the petitioner, the above respondent shall simultaneously issue necessary order so that the grievances of the petitioner, as raised in the representation, could be redressed without delay in the light of the order passed by him on such representation. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)