IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 4958 of 2006 Between: G. Pushpalatha W/o Ramakrishna PIn 01055-PH-041, II Year D Pharmacy S.G.P.R. Government Polytechnic, Kurnool ..... PETITIONER AND 1 State Board of Technical Education and Training, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad repby Secretary 2 The Regional Director of Technical Education, Tirupathi 3 SGPR Government Polytechnic, Kurnool, rep by Principal .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to declare the action of the respondent No.1 in directing the respondent NO.3 not to issue hall ticket to the petitioner in respect of 1 and ii year examinations in D. Pharmacy course vide the impugned proceeding No. LR No. SBTET/EE-1-14/Comp.N..R./2001 dt 27-02- 2006 as arbitrary and illegal being violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India by way of issue of a Writ, order or direction, one more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to prosecute and complete the studies in the D. Pharmacy course to which the petitioner was readmitted in the academic year 2003-2004 and pass such other order or orders which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.VIJAYA BHASKER Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following : ORDER This writ petition has been filed by G.Pushpalatha assailing the action of the respondents in not issuing hall tickets to her in respect of 1 and II year examinations in D.Pharmacy course. The writ petition came to be admitted on 14.3.2006 and an interim direction was granted directing the respondents to issue hall tickets to the petitioner. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. By virtue of interim order, hall tickets must have been issued to the petitioner, in which case, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructous. No costs. __________ 16-07-2008 rkk