HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITON No.15626 OF 2010 ORDER: The petitioner submitted an application way back on 30-07-1981 for grant of Swatantra Sainik Samman Pension. She pleaded that her husband participated in the freedom struggle against the erstwhile Nizam Government for merger into Union of India. On earlier occasion, the case of the petitioner was not considered on the basis of a report submitted by the State Government. Thereafter, the re- verification report was submitted. That report was placed before the Scrutiny Committee at its meeting held on 27-03-2008. Since no positive recommendation was made in favour of the petitioner, the 1st respondent passed an order, dated 18-08-2008, rejecting the claim of the petitioner. The same is challenged in this writ petition. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the 1st respondent, learned Government Pleader for Revenue and the learned counsel for the 3rd respondent. 3. Initially, there was verification in respect of the claim of the petitioner and thereafter a re-verification by the State Government. The Committee, comprising of prominent freedom fighters, was constituted by the Central Government for screening and verification of the applications under the Swatantra Sainik Samman Pension Scheme. The application of the petitioner, together with the re- verification report, was placed before the Committee. No positive recommendation was made by the Committee in favour of the petitioner, the 1st respondent did nothing more than conveying the decision of the Committee. The petitioner is not able to point out as to how the decision taken by the Committee is wrong. It is purely the subjective suggestion of the Committee that too, based upon the knowledge of the members thereof. This Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. 4. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J April 06, 2011 KTL