:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8317 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.8317 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.8317 OF 2005 Kishor D. Dive & Ors. ...Petitioners. Versus Bhansraj J. Yada & Ors. ...Respondents. Shri S.S.Gawde for the Petitioners. Shri G.S.Godbole for Respondent No.1. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATE : 21st FEBRUARY, 2006. DATE : 21st FEBRUARY, 2006. DATE : 21st FEBRUARY, 2006. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard Shri Gawde appearing for the petitioners. 2. In my view, if the contentions of the petitioners are that they have obtained the necessary caste/tribe certificates and that it is open to them to seek reliefs that are sought by them from the Authorities in the light of these subsequent development,then, it is always open to them to approach the Authorities for redressal of their grievance. So also, if it is their contention that the intervening transactions in favour of the respondents are also vitiated, then, nothing prevents them from approaching a competent Civil Court to assert their right, title and interest in the immovable property in question and :2: claim appropriate declarations in that behalf. Neither the order of the Authorities nor the order of the Additional Commissioner can prevent the petitioners from resorting to such remedy. The Civil Court will proceed to decide the Issue on its own merits after giving an opportunity to both sides and in accordance with law. Needless to observe that in whichever proceedings the petitioners herein assert their rights, it would be equally open for the respondents to contend that the same are not maintainable or that the reliefs claimed should not be granted. 3. Petition dismissed subject to above. ( S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.) ( S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.) ( S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.)