IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM FRIDAY, THE 5TH AUGUST 2011 / 14TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 21007 of 2011(A) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ CHEKKAL USMAN, S/OSULAIMAN KUTTY, PADINJAREKKARA, POST PURATHUR, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MALAPPURAM. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUR POLICE STATION,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT- 688 051. 3. CHOKKANTAKATH KOYAMU, S/O SUBAIR, CHOKKANTAKATH HOUSE, POST KUTTAYI, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTICT. 685 051. 4. CHELAKKAL ABOOBACKER, S/O.SULAIMAN KUTTY, PADINJAREKKARA, POST PURATHUR, TIRUR TALUK,MALAPPURAM DISTICT. 685 155. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.M.R.SABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss W.P.(C) NO.21007/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE TALUK SURVEYOR DTD. 16.2.2011. P2:- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT DTD. 29.7.2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL:- TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.21007 of 2011 ------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of August, 2011. J U D G M E N T PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, J. The petitioner in this writ petition filed under Article 226 complaint that, at the instance of the first brother of the 4th respondent as well as the 3rd respondent, the 2nd respondent S.I. of police is harassing him by compelling to be present at Tirur Police Station every now and then and compelling him further to settle the civil dispute between him and the 2nd respondent. As directed by us the learned Government Pleader took instructions. According to learned Government Pleader, it was in view of a complaint received from the 4th respondent that the petitioner was summoned. The enquiry reveals that the dispute was a civil dispute and both the parties were advised to have settlement of that dispute through the process of civil court. There never was and will never be any harassment of the petitioner. 2 W.P.(C) No.21007 of 2011 According to us in view of the stand taken by the police, this writ petition can be disposed of recording the submissions of the learned Government Pleader. We record the submissions of learned Government Pleader and dispose of this writ petition. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE ami/