1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3096/2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1265/2009 (The State of Maharashtra and another vs. Ramlal Harlal Agrawal) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATED : DECEMBER 16, 2010 Heard Shri Deshpande, learned Counsel for the applicant/respondent and Smt. Bodade, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the appellants. It appears that this Court had permitted the applicant to withdraw only an amount of Rs.60,000/- on furnishing solvent surety/security to the satisfaction of the Registrar as strong prima facie case had been made out by the appellants. However, subsequently another application was filed by the applicant and more amount was withdrawn. This is a third application for seeking withdrawal of the amount, which now remains deposited in the 2 nationalized Bank. It appears that the applicant is in the habit of filing applications so as to seek withdrawal of the entire amount deposited by the appellants towards the decretal amount. The prayer made in the civil application cannot be granted as it would be very difficult for the appellants to recover the amount from the applicant/respondent in case they succeed in this appeal. The prayer made in the civil application is rejected. The civil application is disposed of. JUDGE khj