wW7/ Vwvw Wamh é BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.{S) No.36gg 0f 2011 /, PETITIONER :: Jugeshwar Seth, S/o. Shri Bhim Seth, aged aboi1t 67 years, retired teacher, R/o. Village and Post Balouda, Block 'Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.) Versus ,9, RESPONDENTS :1)/ State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary School Education Department D.K.S. Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) :2)/ District Education Officer, District Mahasamund, Mahasamund (C.G.) :3)/Block Education Officer, Block Saraipali, _ District (Mahasamund (C.G.) :4) Accountant General Chhattisgarh Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 5 3a W, m, fa‘—c’rrqgx .L.OFGNWY ” o mm 200 mm<m> WWW WWW fs€°rIW %?31%m3néw SB : Hon’ble Shri Manindra M 06-Q7-2011 Shri H.B.Agrawal, $enior Counsel along with Ms. Meera Jaiswal, counsel for the petitioner. Shri A.V. Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. With the consent of learn d counsel for the parties, the petition is heard hnally. This case pertains to grie anoe arising on account of non—grant of retirai dues. Learned counsl appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the m tter may be referred to the High Power Retiral Dues Committee. This Court, in W.P.No.46 2/2004 (Baijnath Mandai Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the atter of retrial dues as the disputed question of facts were involved The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19-06-2006 passed in W.P.No.1961/2006 (Smt. Keja ai Chandrakar Vs. State Govemment of Chhattisgarh and others), nd order dated 13—3-2008 passed in M.C.C. No.105 of 2008 (State f Chhatt‘isgarh and others Vs. Baljnath Manda] and another). Thus, is petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order date 315i January, 2008 passed in W.P.No.4642/2004 (Baijnath andai (supra) as submitted by learned counsel appearing for the partie . g Wis—Fsmo—«z/zm 1—1,so,ooo. o Deepii a,6 2mm; (mag) we. 2mm; mm ui 200 m m (Wu) mmf‘m’a? am 31mlm W WE?! m t2P Wm @m é: aim m This petition is accordingiy disposed of in the same terms iie., the office of the Advocate Generai is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Thereafter, the Committee shatt issue notice to the petitioner and officers concerned within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pa ss order, in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity of aring to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may lle additional documents, if necessary The entire exercise, including ayment of retirai dues, if any, to the petitioner, be compieted within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The petitioner shall supply one complete set of the petition to the State counsel as well as counsel for the Accountant General for transferring the same to the Committee. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge