mm %Ew$%% IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHV AT BILASPUR w.P. (CiNo. é?6 /2o1o PETITIONERs 1’7/ Yashwant, S/o Shri Nanhelal, aged V about 67 years. 2 Smt. Sabita, Widow late Devendra, aged about 60 years W Both R/o Gandhiganj, A” Raigarh, Tahsil &, District Raigarh (C.G.) ‘VERSUS REspONDEN'Ifs' 1) State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretaly Revenue Department :D K s BLWM $21» m 2) The Collector Ralgarh, Distn'ct < Raigarh(C.G.) Nazool Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) é _ V WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE m CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT/WRITS, ORDER/ORDER§2 DIRECTION [DIRECTIONS ETC. The petitioner mmuesnectfhw~ U; W WW, / E 200 WWW ammm 5 “mm W33 mm...m€..cazmm6 7 é VWW<W§m WWww‘wm wranm SB: Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. 1.4.2010 counsel for the petitioners. Smt. Hamida Siddiqui, Shri Vinod Tekam, Pam: advance copy. This petition has been Nazool Officer, Raigarh not pending before him unless fir It hz‘ authorities may :be directed to correct the revenue record of Khasra by the petitioner. the competent Court. It appears that the renewal of lease existing in t- of the name of one Basant apprehension is that While c of Basant Chouhan may als From the documents filed b the petitioners before this Court, it is found that petitioners have Raigarh that name of Basan In the opinion of this Court, there was no occasion for the ' petitioner's to approach this ourt at this stage when final decision on application for renewal has l Lawyer for the State/respondents, on filed by the petitioner for direction to to conclude the case of Patta renewal .al adjudication of title of the parties by us also been prayed that respondent ir favour. However, on account of entry Chouhan in the relevant record, their ‘ sidering the case of renewal; the name be recorded while renewing the lease. ade an application before the Collector, ouhan be struck off. 0t been taken. If the petitioners have No.4l6/O3 (116/3) as claimed pf£tioners have made fan application for H Turm- i mm (Wu) mmm ammw WWW ,1, wm ww€n #Wm Praveen ‘ ” J“/ taken objection with regard whatever grounds which are a‘ be for the concerned authority take into consideration variou to the name of Basant Chouahan on Iailable to them under the law, it would considering the renewal application, to s objection raised by the petitioners in that regard While finally deciding application for renewal of lease. With the aforesaid obser of. Manindfa gudge shrivéstaVa /’/w Sdi‘ aha“ Wm m zoo vations, this petition is finally disposed x