IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.1108 OF 2009 Dinesh Prabhubhai Umarvanshi ...Petitioner. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. G.R.Rege with Saurabh M. Railkar, advs. For the petitioner. Mr. Pradeep Jadhav, AGP For the Respondent Nos.1,2 and 6. Mr.G.D.Utangale i/by Utangale and Co., adv. for the respondent No.3. Mr.Bhavek Manik i/by Wadia Ghandy, advs. for the applicant. Ms.Malan Manoharan i/by Rekha Rajagopal, advs. for the Respondent No.5. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 22, 2010 P.C. 1 According to the petitioner, he has submitted proposal to the respondent no.3 for SRA project. Petitioner has no right, title or interest in this land having accepted the fact that he may have structure on the land. The grievance of the petitioner is that on 21st November, 2006, City Survey Officer has mutated land in favour of the respondent no.7. A reply is filed by the respondent no.5 that the land was acquired in their favour and possession of the land including subject land which is surveyed under old survey no.431 now bearing CTS No.510 was handed over in the year 1947 to 1949. 2 2 We do not propose to go into controversy suffice to say that the reliefs as claimed in this petition can not be entertained. At the highest, if the petitioner submits the scheme to the respondent no.3, respondent no.3 will take action according to the law and communicate their decision to the petitioner. With the above observations, petition stands disposed off. (J.H. BHATIA,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)