IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 341 of 2007 Between: 1 Ajay Kumar Dochani, s/o Amarnath Gupta (Dochania r/o House No.8-2-686/K/16, Opp:Dolphin Swimming Pool, Road No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-500 034, A.P., 2 Roshani Gupta, w/o Govind, r/o of House No.8-2-686/K/16, Opp:Dolphin Swimming Pool Road No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-500 034, A.P., ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 the Collector, (Panchayat Wing), Medak, District Sangareddy. 2 District Panchayat Officer, medak District, Sangareddy, Medak District, A.P., 3 Extension Officer, (PR&RD), Jinnaram Mandal, Jinnaram Mandal, Medak District. 4 The Panchayat Secretary, Annaram Village, Jinnaram mandal, Medak District, A.P., 5 Sarpanch, Annaram Village, Jinnaram Mandal, medak District, A.P., 6 The Director, Town and Country Planning, Government of A.P., Masab Tank, Hyderabad, A.P., .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents herein to set aside and forbear in the enforcement of the orders in Memo No.3355/2006/A-7/pts. dated 27th Oct.2006, of the 1st respondent herein, and to permit the work of thesite/layout preparation to progress at Survey No.261, Annaram Village, Jinnaram Mandal, Medak District, and direct the 6th respondent to accord the technical and ﬁnal approval of the Lay out plans of the petitioners ﬁled on 14th June, 2006, and pass such order or orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the matter. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.SAROSH SAM BASTAWALA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following ORDER: The writ petition was listed for hearing on 09.09.2008. Since there was no representation for the petitioners, it was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today also there is no representation. The proceeding sheet discloses that on an earlier occasion also, there was no representation for the petitioners. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for default. ___________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt: 12.09.2008. kdl