cra196.11 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________ CRA NO. 196 OF 2011 GULAM RASOOL KAMARUDDIN VERSUS THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL VAIJAPUR THR CHIEF OFFICER AND ORS ... Advocate for Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kasliwal Ajit D. ... CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. Dated: September 08, 2011 ... This civil revision application has been filed challenging the order dated 19th July, 2011 below Exh.33 in Wakf Suit No.7/2008. 2 It is the contention of the revision applicant that his application is partly allowed. However, he is not allowed to delete certain part of pleadings in the plaint. According to Wakf Tribunal, such deletion of pleading is not necessary and, therefore, that prayer has been cra196.11 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________ rejected. According to the learned Counsel for the revision applicant, it is for the plaintiff to decide which relief should be sought for and ask for amendment, accordingly. He, therefore, submits that in the interest of justice, the Wakf Tribunal should have allowed prayer of the revision applicant for deleting certain part of the prayer and pleading in the suit. 3 I have given due consideration to the submissions of the learned Counsel for the revision applicant. The tribunal has assigned correct reasons while passing the impugned order. Therefore, in revision application, this Court finds it difficult to entertain to the prayer of the revision applicant. The parties can always pray and argue at the time of final hearing that cra196.11 3 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________ such relief is not necessary and not to press the same. Therefore, in my opinion, the view taken by the tribunal cannot be said to be unreasonable. 4 In that view of the matter, I do not find it necessary to interfere in the impugned order. Civil Revision Application stands rejected. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) PLK/*