IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO :1120 of 2001 Between: Smt. Rahaman Bee ..... PETITIONER AND Joint Collector, Medak and others .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.AHMED KHAN Counsel for Respondent Nos.3, 4, 5, 12 & 13: MR. M.BASITH ALI YAVAR Counsel for Respondent No.11: MR. SURESH SHIVSAGAR The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled for a writ of mandamus to set aside orders, dated 07.03.1995 and 28.11.2000 of respondent Nos.2 and 1 respectively, whereby the occupancy rights in respect of land admeasuring Acs.23.05 guntas in favour of respondent No.6 have been confirmed. At the hearing, Sri Suresh Shivsagar and Sri M.Basith Ali Yavar, learned counsel appearing for some of the respondents submitted that respondent No.6 died. In support of their submission, they invited my attention to order, dated 23.06.2003 passed by this Court wherein it is stated that it was represented by the parties that respondent Nos.6, 9 and 10 died during the pendency of the writ petition. Though the said order was set aside for a diﬀerent reason by a subsequent order, dated 01.08.2007, the said observation has not been set aside. Sri Ahmed Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute this claim of the learned counsel for the respondents. In view of the same, the writ petition against respondent No.6 has abated, as her legal representatives were not brought on record. As the case does not survive against the other respondents, the writ petition is dismissed as abated. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 4th AUGUST, 2008. kvni