IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23572 of 2010 FARZANA KHATOON Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 03.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged against the petitioner that he operated the wife of the informant and due to the bad surgical interference the victim died. It is also alleged that the petitioner is not a qualified doctor. The documents contained in Annexure-4 suggests that on the alleged date of occurrence i.e., 22.9.2009, the victim was admitted to P.M.C.H. but neither the document of the P.M.C.H. as contained in Annexure-4 nor the post mortem report as contained in Annexure- 2 suggest any surgical interference on the alleged date of occurrence. Considering the aforesaid submission, let the petitioner, namely, Farzana khatoon in the event of her arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Phulwarisharif P.S. Case No. 391 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. Anand Kr. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)