IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 20TH OCTOBER 2008 / 28TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 23776 of 2008(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- K.V.SAJU, S/O.VARGHESE KADAPARAMBIL HOUSE, MALAYIDAMTHURUTH. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENTS: ------------------- 1. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY ERNAKULAM, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. SECRETARY , REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.A.J.VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.23776/08 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 27.11.2007. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DT 29.5.2008 IN MVAA NO.36/2008. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 23776 OF 2008 (E) ==================== Dated this the 20th day of October, 2008 J U D G M E N T The prayer sought in this writ petition is to direct the 1st respondent to consider the modified proposal submitted by the petitioner pursuant to Ext.P2 judgment rendered by the STAT in MVAA No.36/08. Petitioner has averred that the modified proposal was submitted within the time allowed by the Tribunal and that the same was received by the Secretary, RTA on 11/6/08. It is also stated that the receipt of the modified proposal has been entered in the Inward Register with No.4404. If as stated the modified proposal has been submitted within the 30 days as allowed by the STAT in Ext.P2 judgment, the 1st respondent is bound to consider the same. This the 1st respondent shall do, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 8 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp