1` IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR W.P.No. 2128/2008 Dilip s/o Sukhdeo Ingale vs. Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Chikhli and another. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri A.S.Kilor, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri R.L.Khapre, Advocate for the respondents. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & A.H.JOSHI, JJ DATE : 29.9.2008 We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner who is challenging the promotion granted to respondent no.2 for the post of accountant by the respondent no.1 Committee. 2. Undoubtedly, the respondent no.1 Committee is an Industry as defined under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and, therefore, the petitioner has an alternative and efficacious remedy of approaching to the Industrial Court by filing the complaint under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971. 3. If such a complaint is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today, the Industrial Court shall consider the same on its own merits and the 2` period of pendency of this petition shall be taken into consideration for condonation of delay, if any. 4. The petition is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE patle