IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.9228 of 2011 Vijender Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Jasbir Mor, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has relied upon a Detailed Marks Sheet taken from the Internet to say that he was qualified before the cut off date. Even if the cut off date is taken as 31.5.2010, then the petitioner did not possess the degree. The petitioner is not in a position to even show the degree. Detailed Marks Sheet is no substitute for a degree. In addition, the petitioner also faces the infirmity by acquiring this degree through Distance Mode of Education from Sardarshahr. Whether such degree is recognised or not is still being debated before this court. No case for interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction is, therefore, made out. Dismissed. July 13, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE