HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R. VARMA AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY. W.P.NO. 18452 OF 2006. Dated: 11.09.2006. BETWEEN: Ghulam Mustafa. ….. Petitioner. And 1. The Inspector, Special Investigation Team, Hyderabad, and others. ….. Respondents. ORAL ORDER: ( per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.S.R. Varma ) ….. 1. The grievance of the petitioner in this taken up case is that the police officials are frequently visiting the house of the petitioner, which forced them to vacate the house from L.B. Nagar to Tolichowki and that Md. Jameeuddin, Inspector of Police, SIT, along with his men, is visiting the house of the petitioner at Tolichowki and telling his wife to send petitioner’s another son, namely, Gulam Rabbani, student of MCA, to the SIT office. Therefore, the petitioner prays that appropriate directions be issued to the concerned not to visit the house of the petitioner. 2. In reply to the notice sent by this Court, the Inspector of Police, Special Investigating Team, Hyderabad, filed counter stating that the elder son of the petitioner by name Gulam Yazdani, who was an ISI agent, died in March, 2006, in the exchange of fire between the security forces and terrorists on 06.03.2006, that the second son of the petitioner by name Gulam Rabani is also an accused in Crime No.234/2005 of Gopalapuram Police Station and that the youngest son of the petitioner is Gulam Mujataba. It is further stated that the petitioner was residing originally at L.B. Nagar, within the limits of L.B. Nagar Police Station, when the above said Crime No.234/2005 was registered and that in view of the fact that the elder son of the petitioner had contacts with ISI agents, the police had kept surveillance on the house of the petitioner, but never visited the house of the petitioner and harassed the petitioner as alleged. 3. In view of the said revelation made by 1st respondent in the counter-affidavit, we do not propose to interfere in the process of investigation of the matter. However, it is needless to mention that the police shall not resort to any harassment or resort to any unlawful action against the petitioner. 4. With the above observation, the writ petition is closed. _______________ D.S.R. VARMA. J., ___________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY. J. Dated: 11.09.2006 VRK. HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R. VARMA AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY. W.P.NO. 18452 OF 2006. ( Order of the Bench delivered by Hon’ble Sri Justice D.S.R. Varma ) Dt: 11.09.2006.