HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 756 of 2009 (M/S) Gajram Singh ... Petitioner Versus District Magistrate Udham Singh Nagar and others ... Respondents Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vinok Nautiyal, Addl. Advocate General the State of Uttarakhand/respondents. 22.05.2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The contention of learned counsel for petitioner is that the licence of fair price shop of the petitioner has been suspended by means of show cause notice dated 03.03.2009 and a reply/representation to the show cause notice has been given to the District Supply Officer, Udham Singh Nagar, which is still pending. Learned counsel for petitioner restricts his prayer for a direction for this Court directing the District Supply Officer, Udham Singh Nagar to decide the representation of the petitioner expeditiously. The prayer seems to be innocuous in nature and the petitioner confines his prayer for such a direction. The District Supply Officer, Udham Singh Nagar is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner expeditiously within 45 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 22.05.2009 Virendra