:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1013 OF 2008 Shri Bhaskar Yeshwant Raut ..Petitioner Vs. The Hon. Secretary, Maharashtra Rajya Bharat Scouts and Guides ..Respondent Mr. A.V. Chatuphale for petitioner. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B.H. B.H. B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. MARLAPALLE, J. MARLAPALLE, J. Date Date Date : : : February 15, 2008. February 15, 2008. February 15, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner whose application filed under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has been partly allowed by directing the employer to pay bonus for the period from 1999-2000 to 2002-03 i.e. for four years as per the Rules. . So far as the claim of the petitioner in relation to the order passed by the Labour Court on 18/7/2002 in Complaint (ULP) No. 435 of 1999 is concerned, the Labour Court has noted the cross-examination of the applicant in which he admitted to have received an amount of Rs.1,77,233/- :2: and Rs.4,629/- by way of backwages and wages for the period from January 1998 to May 1998. The document at Exh.C-6 placed on record by the employer also indicated that 50% of the wages for January to May 1998 were paid, in addition to the suspension allowance. The Court noted that from 29/7/2002 to 14/3/2003 the applicant was on leave. The Labour Court further noted that from the pay fixation sheet submitted by the employer it was clear that he was paid the annual increments as well, so also bonus for the accounting year 1998-99 was paid to him. . I do not find any error apparent on the face of the record committed by the Labour Court in allowing the petitioner’s application partly so as to call for interference under Article 227 of the Constitution. . Hence, the petition is rejected summarily. (B.H. (B.H. (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) Marlapalle,J.) Marlapalle,J.)