1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVN. APPLN. NO.196 OF 2009 WITH CA NO.266/2003. (M/s Jhalani Tools India Ltd. Vs. M/s Saklecha Steel Pvt.Ltd., Jalna ) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 8th January, 2010. ... 1) Heard Mr.Jayant Chitnis for the original Judgment Debtor(appellant herein) and Mr. Solshe for the respondent. 2) The short controversy in the matter relates to the attachment of the property allegedly by BIFR authorities and that an amount of Rs.44,46,000/- was paid by the judgment debtor and consequently, according to Mr. Chitnis, the Execution could not have proceeded ahead. 3) There is no certification produced by the Judgment debtor about squaring of entire liability covering the controversy between the parties as is mandatory in terms of Order XXI Rule 2 of Civil Procedure Code. 4) The second aspect of attachment of property by BIFR authorities, is coined 2 for the first time before the Executing Court, though it is so stated that such attachment has taken place way back in 1998. 5) Taking into consideration all these details, the order below Exhibit-18 and 23 recorded by the learned Judge, cannot be said to be no in tune with the legal position. No interference warranted. Civil Revision Application with CA dismissed. No costs. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/cra196.09