BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the First day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.9663 of 2011 1.R. SARAVANAN 2.N. MURUGESH 3.S. SHIVA @ SRINIVASAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1-3 Vs STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TOWN NORTH POLICE STATION, IN CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2011, DINDIGUL ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. M.SUBASH BAU Advocate For Respondent : MR. A.RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged commission of offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 341, 506(ii) of IPC and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side) would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the de-facto complainant no case has been registered only petition enquiry is pending. 3. Considering the rival submission made on either side, the respondent is directed not to harass the petitioners. The respondent is directed to follow the procedure contemplated under D.K.BASU VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL reported in AIR (1997) SC 610 under the guise of enquiry. With above observation, the petition is disposed of. sd/- 01/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TOWN NORTH POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL 2.THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. M.SUBASH BAU Advocate SR.No.25601 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9663 of 2011 Date :01/08/2011 TR : 03.08.2011: 1p/4c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/