IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M-29781 of 2011 Date of Decision:16.11.2011 Sanjay Kumar . . .Petitioner Versus State of UT, Chandigarh . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Sanjiv Majra, Advocate, for Mr.R.M. Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.D.D. Sharma, Advocate, for U.T., Chandigarh. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) On instructions received from ASI Surender Gautam, it is conceded by learned counsel for the U.T., Chandigarh that the petitioner has joined the investigation. However, it is submitted that the alleged sword is yet to be recovered but at the same time learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is a teacher and had no role to play in the alleged occurrence. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, order dated 29.09.2011 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions already contained therein. Petition is disposed of. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) NOVEMBER 16, 2011 JUDGE Vivek