$g UM’BLE, $HLRE ££I®TK$E $AT’EEE iii. .é’aGNXHgYi‘M n Y?” Nm W‘s ii$$§f£i3 i’i?‘ ’mwh‘” ”$1 AShGK Ruxuu Duhev, Eon J; D€veiog3m€m Comma Parmxi Raipur, through s Managmg Divsctor ¥§R§T ‘FE’E‘ZTE‘ EWDER 1§FET§€LE 22%;227 §F THE €1£§§1§§§TY¥W§E$X§§ GF ENDEA &E g“a3‘a£"&‘ $h1i S.S.Raj;put, commsl fer the petitionar. 8111i Ayaz Naved, cousaE‘; fox“ the mspondent. emAaL gamma giméaaogy Wirh fha consant of 16931166; counsal appeariag for the pMViies, the petifiau ks hgard fmaiiy. 2. iearaad counsa} appearing for tine patitimmr submitg that 11m pstitioner (106s not waizt to ccntcst T116 mattar on maxim at this staga Hmvever, Ieemmd. cmmsel pz‘ayS that thg pé:’dtianar may b6 greatsd liberty to‘maks a reprssentation bemm the, regyoudeai;authcritjias 1'0 coasidgr his caSe m ’ accox‘gallcé Mth 1aw Within a s$ipula$$& varied. I ? It G § 8111i Shiv Narayem Dubey, aggd ahout 54v yams, Aswistes‘at E11gine€n Chhatu‘ggarh State End113t1i2~l D627E10§m€ni Wzwww Ccxporaiion, Raipur (CG) EE$P®JDTE§T 1‘ M L ‘arh Saab: "industr? ”‘ S111“; Navsé, ieainad comlscl appearing for ths r€Spo11£iel1t, submits That, m' thfa evsni, a reprwentation is mads by the paa'cloner, tha same shail he considm‘ad axld decider} in accoydarzce with law, 011 its own maxits, within a par‘md cf six weeks, fram thE daté of 1‘Eceip‘i of the rapresantation. uv 4. E11 View of ths forggoing} accordmg to 1sarn€€i counwl aypsaziag for ths paitiaxiel‘, nmhmg survive$ in this pé’ritisn for adjudication. 5. Accmidfag‘i , tho mat‘ior stands disposal of, Conwquontly, LA. V0. 01 also stagc‘as éiisposod of. ‘ Sd/- " , ‘ Satish K. Agnihptri ‘ j Judge 3E ‘ y l 1 ‘V 7 1 :