IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No. 315-M of 2005 Decided on : 13.11.2014 Vijay Pal . . . Appellant Versus Sumitra . . . Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAJ RAHUL GARG PRESENT: None for the appellant. Ms. Pratibha Yadav, Advocate for the respondent. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) On the last date of hearing as well, none had appeared on behalf of the appellant. 2. Even today, despite the case having been called twice, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant. It appears that the appellant is no more interested in pursuing the litigation. 3. Dismissed for want of prosecution. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (RAJ RAHUL GARG) November 13, 2014 JUDGE J.Ram JAWALA RAM 2014.11.17 14:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh