IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 6642 of 2010 Date of decision: 25.10.2010. Satish Kumar ….. Petitioner. Vs. State of H.P. & anr. …. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the Petitioner : Mr. Harish Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J.K.Verma, Dy. Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: A writ of mandamus may kindly be issued and the respondent No. 2 may kindly be directed and ordered to decide the representation made by the petitioner in a time bound manner. 2. The petitioner has submitted Annexure P-5 representation and the same is pending before the second respondent. There will be a direction to second respondent to look into Annexure P-5 representation and take appropriate action in accordance with law adverting to the submissions made therein within a period of one month from the date of production of a copy of this judgement alongwith a copy of writ petition by the petitioner. - 2 - 3. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. October 25, 2010 (Justice Kuldip Singh), (Hem) Judge.