IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42868 of 2009 SHYAMLESH NARAYAN SON OF LATE DEVI NARAYAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- CHHOTKI DELHA, P.S. DELHA, DISTRICT- GAYA. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. INDRANI DEVI WIFE OF SRI BALMUKUND PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NARAYAN CHAUN, MANGALA GAURI, P.S. CIVIL LINES, DISTRICT- GAYA. ------- 3 10.02.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, State and the opposite party no.2. It is submitted that the opposite party no.2 obtained the bail by producing the incorrect copy of the first information report and made incorrect affidavit. It is submitted that the petitioner has brought the statement of the victim. However, the learned counsel does not say that after the grant of bail the opposite party no.2 has committed any act which warrants cancellation of bail. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State submits that the grounds made out in this application for cancellation of bail is not an appropriate ground. Having considered the submissions of the parties and the ground stated in the petition, I do not find it to be a fit case for cancellation of bail. This application is, accordingly, rejected. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)