IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 9TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 20TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 36459 of 2008(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.BAWA SALIM, S/O.K.M.BAVA, KAVUNKAL HOUSE, VAZHAKALA, KANAYANOOR TALUK, DIST. ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.REGHU KOTTAPPURAM RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE TAHSILDAR, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK, DISTRICT IDUKKI. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER,CHINNAKKANAL VILLAGE UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK, DIST. IDUKKI. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI DISTRICT, IDUKKI. 4. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. THE SUB REGISTRAR, S.R.O.RAJAKUMARI, DIST. IDUKKI. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI. M.A. ASIF THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ----------------------- W.P.(C).No. 36459/2008 ------------------------ Dated this the 9th day of February, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner's grievance is regarding the non-acceptance of basic tax in respect of the property covered by Exts.P2 ad P3 documents and Ext.P8 genuineness certificate issued by the first respondent. Complaining of this he has moved the 3rd respondent by filing Ext.P9 and as per Ext.P10, the 3rd respondent has forwarded Ext.P9 to the first respondent. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter is still pending consideration of the first respondent without any orders. Taking into account the submission made as above, I direct that the first respondent to consider Ext.P9 in the light of Exts.P2,P3,P8 and P10 referred to above. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 4 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the /2/ judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the first respondent for compliance. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/