2 ca180-10 dmt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 180 OF 2010 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL ( STAMP) NO. 11984 OF 2010 Janice Peters. .. Applicant Vs. Gilroy D’Souza. .. Respondent Ms. R. Bhargvan for applicant. Mr. B.G. Vaidya for respondent. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U. D. SALVI, JJ. NOVEMBER 29, 2010. P.C. Heard. Family Court Appeal (Stamp) No. 11984 of 2010 has been filed belatedly and hence this application for condonation of delay. 2. As per the office note the appeal is beyond time by 596 days. The applicant has explained the reasons for delay in para 3 of this application. We have perused the affidavit in reply filed by Gilroy D’souza. The applicant is the mother-in-law of the respondent and she had approached the Family Court seeking access to the grand child which 2 ca180-10 prayer has been turned down by the Family Court. 3. We are, therefore, satisfied that the delay so caused deserves to be condoned and hence the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 4. List the Appeal for admission on 8.12.2010. (U.D. SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)