IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Criminal I Bail Application No.331 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Alam ……….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ------- Opposite party ________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No.9 of 2010, U/s 420/406/34 IPC, P.S. Bhagwanpur, Distt. Haridwar Dated: March 22, 2010 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. Parikshit Saini, Adv. for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, learned Addl. G.A. for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that no specific allegation has been made against the applicant and the allegations made against him are civil in nature. Further, the applicant is not at all beneficiary in the said transaction. He further submitted that the arrest of co- accused Muntazir, Jamshed and Foker has been stayed by this Court on 2.2.2010 vide Writ Petition (Criminal) No.55 of 2010 while the co-accused Aftab has been released on bail by this Court on 10.3.2010, and the applicant also deserves bail on the ground of parity. After considering all the facts and circumstances, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Alam be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of J.M., Roorkee, District Haridwar. The bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 22.03.2010 Rajeev Dang