^ IN THE HON»BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C. No.c3clS^ of 2011 tlyt1^ B Arising out ofW,P.(SI No. 2002 / 2011 PETITIONERS : o^ 1. Madho Singh Gouriya, S/o Mallurara Gouriya, aged about 54 years, R/o village Parsuli, Post Khertha Bazar, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 2. Chain Singh Ganware, S/o Fattesingh Ganware, aged about 54 years, R/o Village 85 post- Kodekasha, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 3. Ghanshyajn Sahu, s/o Latkhor Rani Sahu, aged about 44 years, R/o Village and post Bheemkanhar, Distt. Durg (C.G.). 4. Manohar Lal Sinha, S/o Keju Ram Sinha, aged about 43 years, R/o Village Mankl, Post Arjunda, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 5. Kastur Ram Rawate, S/o Guhari Rani Rawate, aged about 47 years, R/o village & L/ i post Bargaon, Tahsil and Distt. Durg (C.G.) 6. Alakh Ram Rathore, S/o Asharam Rathore, aged about 51 years, R/o Village & Post vy ^ ^l (/ Bheemkanhar, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 7. Ghanshyam Singh Patel, S/o Jharu Rara Patel, aged about 47 years, R/o Village - Bhediu, Post Dondi Lohara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 8. Abdul Shafiq Khan, S/o Abdul Gaffur Khan aged about 46 years, R/o Village & Post Dondi Lohara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 9. Khambhan Lal, S/o Daulat Ram, aged about 54 years, R/o Village Nangutola, Post Bhanwarmara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 10. Preet Bai, W/o Tahjuram, aged about 51 years, R/o Village Badajungera, Post Kodekasa, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 11. Dharam Singh,S/o Bideram, aged about44 years, R/o Village and post Ghotiya, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 12. Smt. Amrotin Bai, W/o Akturam , aged about 50 years, R/o Village and post Dondi Lohara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 13. Kansh Kumar Sahu, S/o Surit Ram Sahu, aged about c, <;^u ^:^ ^^ ^ 44 years, R/o Village Raipura, Post Sambalpur, Distt.- Durg (C.G.) 14. Rajkumar Nayak, S/o Jotsingh Nayak, aged about 41 years, R/o Village Badajun gera, post Kodekasa, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 15. Dhurpal Singh, S/o Sunher Ram, aged about 46 years, R/o Village and Post Dondi Distt. Durg (C.G.) 16. Nirmal Kumar S/o Bannu Ram, aged about 54 years, R/o Village Bater^, Post Dondi Lohara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 17. Krishan Kumar Urbasha S/o Radhe Lal, aged about 45 years, R/o Village Jatadah, Post Sahgagaon, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 18. Ram Milan Nayak, S/o Asha Rani, aged about 49 years, R/o Village Garka, Post Bheemkanhar, Distt. Durg(C.G.) 19. Jeev Rakhan Mankar, S/o Sagar, aged about 48 years, R/o Village Bhendi, Post Dondilohara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) ^ 20. Gautam Ram Pisda, S/o Setram, aged about 52 years, R/o Village Semardhi, Post Sambalpur, Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgasrh, Through- The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 3. Collector, Tribal Development, Durg Distt. -Durg (C.G.) 4. Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Welfare Development, Dondilohara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 5. Block Education Officer, Dondi, Distt. Durg (C.G.) APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF W.P. (Sl N0. 2002/2011 WHICH WAS ORDERED TO BE DISMISSED ON 17.01.2011 THAT THE DEFAULT WAS NOT MADE GOOD WITHIN TWO WEEKS. i &,..^^S^h 1 Y ^^ A HIGH COURT OF CHHA1TI8GARH AT BILASPUR 4 M PETmQNERS RESPONDENTS M.C.C,No.395of2011 Madho Singh Gouriya & Others. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. APPLICATION FOR RE8TORATION OF W.P.fS)No. 2002/2011 SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. AenihetriL J. Present: Sfari B.P.Singb, Advocacte forthe petitioners. Shri Ajit Singh, Panel Lawyer forthe State. 08DER(ORAL) (Passed on 26th day ofjuly, 2011) I.A. No. 1 This is an application for condonation of delay m filing fhe restoration application. Sufficient cause has been shown. Leamed counsel appearmg for other side has no objection. Delay is condoned. 1. Leamed counsel appearing for fhe petitioners submits that W.P.(S) 2002/2011, was dismissed for want of prosecution on account of pre-emptory order passed by tfais Court on 17.01.2011. The mistake is bonafide andfhe petition may be restored to its file. 2. Reasonable and sufficient cause has been shown. W.P.(S) No. 2002/2011, is re^stored to the original file, subject to payment ofa sum ofRs. 2000/- as cost, to the High Court Legal Aid Committee. 3. A copy ofttus order be placed on record of original writ petition and fhe same be listed for hearing. SatisbK.Agnihotn Judge Amit