/ t IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONTEMPT PETITION N0. 'Z/'2-OF 2003^ (Arising out of the order dated 2/7/2007 passed by Hon'ble Shri Justiice Satish K. Agnihotri, in the matter of Writ Petition (S) No.37b9of2007) PETITIONER ^" Smt. Rita Sandhya Naik, W/o Shri A.K. €•• Naik, aged about 41 years, presently ^ \J^\ t-,.\ ^6-'\^N'- residing at Govt. B.Sc. Nursing College, -^- \i.v-^ ..-" Tikrapara, Raipur (C.G.) ^ ^ •^ A-[^' ^A--" RESPONDENTS CONTEMNORS VERSUS _:1) Dr.S.L.Adile Director (Medical Education), i Old Nurses Hostel Building, Mantralaya Campus, Raipur (C.G.) 2) Smt. Beena Chakravorty Principal, Govt. B.Sc. Nursing College, Behind Nut&n Hr. Secondary School, Tikarapara, Raipur (C.G.) CONTEMPT PETITION U/A 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT 1973 IS' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR S.B. : HON»BLESHRI MANINDRA MOHAN SHRFVASTAVA,J. Contempt PetitionNo.212/2008 PETITIONER RBSPONDENTS Smt. Rita Sandhya Naik Versus Dr. S.L. Adile& another Petition under Article 215 ofthe Constitution oflndia Appearance: Shri P.S. Koshy, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Pallav Mishra, counsel for the respondents. ORAL- ORDER (Passedon07.01.2011) 1. At the outset, it has been submitted by learned counsel for the respondents that the orders which are alleged to be in violation of the interim order, which was passed by this Court earlier on 2.7.2007 in W.P. (S) No.3709/07, has been revoked. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the respondent No.l in his return and additional affidavit has tendered unconditional apology and has stated that he had no intention of willful disobedience of the order of the Court and he has great regard and respect for the orders and proceedings of this Court. Learned counsel for the respondents also submitted that the respondent \ No.l has been suspended and is not holding the office and /fS^\ \^y -2- / ^s therefore, no further orders and proceedings can be drawn by him in the capacity as Director, Medical Education. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though the orders dated 8.4.2008 (Annexure 0-3)and dated 8.8.2008 (Annexure C-4) have been revoked, the petitioner is not being allotted specific work in the Institytion, which she was performing prior to the issuance of order dated 25.5.2007. He, however, clearly submits that salary of the post is being paid by judicial intervention under an interim order passed by this Court in W.P. No.3709/07 3. Considering that the orders dated 8.4.2008 & 8.8.2008' have been revoked; taking into consideration the totality of the Gircumstances, it would be proper to discharge the respondents from the contempt proceedings. The respondents/contemnors are accordingly discharged. However, 'it would be open for the petitioner to make appropriate application to the existing Director in respect ofthe existing grievances. 4. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is finally disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge / Praveen