IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 8274 of 2010 Date of Decision: 14.7.2011 *** Jaswinder Kaur .. Petitioner Vs. Avtar Singh .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present:- Mr. M.K. Bhatnagar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Padam Kumar Jain, Advocate for the respondent. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. Both the Courts below have refused to grant ad-interim injunction to the petitioners-plaintiff. The grouse of the plaintiff is that initially her husband was co- sharer to the extent of 1/9th share in the house in dispute and after his death, she inherited the said share and now the defendant-respondent is interfering in her possession. However, the perusal of impugned order reveals that no proof with regard to her being in possession of the suit house was produced on record by the plaintiff. Even she herself took the contradictory plea of her residing in the suit house and on the other hand averred that she had shifted to her parental village Sidhpur, after the death of her husband Finding that the plaintiff has no prima facie case and balance of convenience in her favour and being not in possession, is not going to suffer any irreparable loss in case the temporary injunction is not granted, the Courts below rightly dismissed the application of the petitioner. There is no illegality or perversity in the impugned order. The revision petition, being without merit, is accordingly dismissed. (ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE July 14, 2011 Jiten