IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 10060 of 2011-G. Decided on: 23rd November, 2011. Phool Chand Gupta. … Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. A.K. Vashista, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. AG and Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers: “(i) That a writ in the nature of certiorari may kindly be issued for quashing the order dated 14.10.2010, Annexure P-6 passed by the respondent No.3. (ii) A writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued directing the respondents to refund the recovered amount from the salary of the petitioner to the petitioner in case the respondents succeed in recovering any amount from the salary of the petitioner in the meanwhile.” 2. There will be a direction to the second respondent/competent authority to look into Annexure P-5 with notice to the petitioner and take appropriate action thereon in accordance with law and communicate the same 2 to the petitioner. The entire process, as above, shall be completed within a period of six weeks from the date of the production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the second respondent, which shall be done within two weeks from today. Till such time, there shall be no recovery. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Authenticated copy to the petitioner. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 23rd November, 2011. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (tr/kck) Judge. 3