1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR M.C.A. NO. 1401/09 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 256/2000. Union of India .vs. Zingoo Rama Sidam Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. DATE : 16 th FEBRUARY, 2010. Heard Ms. S.V. Salwankar, learned Advocate holding for Mr. L.S. Lambat, learned Advocate for appellant and Ms. P.S. Mahagaonkar, learned Advocate holding for Mr. Harsulkar, learned Advocate for respondent. It is submitted by the learned Advocate for the applicant that the Advocate representing the applicant was busy in another matter and as such, he was unable to attend the First Appeal which was dismissed in default. It is further submitted that the Counsel was undergoing medical treatment thereafter for the ailment. 2 For the reasons stated in the application and in the interest of justice, the application is allowed. The appeal is restored to its file. Judge J.