1 IN THE HIéHV... COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPU " gHHATTIscmRH WRITPETITION. No...?>.fH%7?§f/2006 PETITIONER BENIRAM DEWANGAN S/o DgKHURAM DEWANGAN ‘ ..,.- AGED“3¢YEARS, .‘_ 30 w / OCCUPATIONzTEACHER, \o G0VT.-:31?R1MARY SCHOOL, (b AAND'Ag: ' BLOCK? DURG, DISTT: DURG (0G) VERSUS RESPONDENTS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL Q€L KEDUCATION, MANTRALAYA, 0 D.K.S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR (C.G) _ (,‘Q/ )0 (r #vf’m‘z I”): b6Q (Ii $vM) \o Q6) FO- 2f DISTRICT EDUCATION z g» //0FFICER, 039W” DISTRICT DURG(C.G) “PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS TO ‘ MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARY AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS” R 4n i£ \ :Heard Shri‘Anurag Jha, counsel to ' the petitioner and Shri Sumeeh Baiaj; ’Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents, on advance eopy. The case of the petitioner is that he is working as Assistant Teacher since 17—2—89 and as per the instructions dated 2442—98 issued by the State of MP. the Assistant Teachers who have passed B.T.i.r, Be Ed. and MEd, examination on their oWn expenses after 22-10-64 are entitied for two advance vinorements and order of Government is Ar nexure-PI’I. ‘Thé petiticmer passed his B. Ed, examination on his own oost in the year 1995 and a‘certiticate to that, effecf is 'Annexure-P/d but the’petiticner haa not baen given thelbenefit whereas Simiiariy situated perSons have aeen granted two advance increments under the ordefs of the Tribunai and this Court vide AnnexureP/Gi ' Having heard teamed counsei for the parties, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, C-vitnout e'x Dressing any opinion of‘the' merit of the r case,’ the petitioner is aiiowed to makera r etaiied representation along with copy respondent No.3 within a period of 15 daysfrom today and’in’ turnkespondent 0:3 is directedto examine the case of the petitioner in the, light of averments’m e by the petitioner in this petitidn and in the representation also. lf responden No3 reaches to the conclusion that simiiariy situated persons have been ranted the benefit of two advance 7 inorements and the petitioner’s caseris iso covered for‘grant of two advance increments on the basis of Government order, then to pass orders'within a period of 3 months from today, in accorda ce‘with iawi it .of this petition raising aii his grievances to i ‘ With the direction aforesaid, the p tition stands disposed of. Parties are entitled for certified co y of this order. Barve Sd/- : L.C. Bhadoo 3 New ..