1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2349/2007 (Sita Devi Vs. Khadi & Village Industries Commission & Ors.) Date of order : 26.11.2008 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. Vinod Choudhary on behalf of Mr. Harish Purohit, for the petitioner. Mr. Girish Sankhala with Mr. T. Gupta, for the respondents. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In this case, the petitioner is challenging Annexure-1 whereby the petitioner was informed to deposit margin money on the ground that the unit was closed before two years and as per terms and conditions the petitioner is entitled for margin money, if the unit completes two years of business. Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently argued that assertion made in Annexure-1 is totally false that the unit was closed before two years or within one year. This is a question of fact. In this view of the matter, the petitioner 2 may file a representation and adduce evidence before the respondents within a period of fifteen days from today with regard to the question of running business for more than two years. Upon filing the said representation, the respondents are directed to decide the same within a period of one month thereafter. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition is disposed of. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. arun