IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M-2105 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 31.3.2011 ... Paramjit Kaur ................Petitioner vs. State of Punjab .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. Manjit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Sh. Amandeep Singh Rai,Assistant Advocate General, Punjab ... K.C. Puri, J. Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Sant Singh, has submitted that petitioner has joined the investigation but the golden ornaments are yet to be recovered. On the other hand counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is no specific entrustment of any golden ornament and has placed on file sworn affidavit of complainant dated 16.9.2009, in which she has stated that her father has sold the car and the jewellery which was given to her by her father and her husband, are with her father Bikram Singh. He has further contended that the petitioner is aged 67 years. So, in these circumstances, without commenting on the merits of the case, the order dated 24.1.2011, passed by this Court is made absolute. ( K.C. Puri ) 31.3.2011 Judge chugh