c .^. ^ ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR(C.G.) CR. IVI. P. N0.3—of 2010 "'ngteBench ^ p PETITIONER ^^^ ....^Wl? •;^^>^^D TtO^ .\->°' .A .••<'-' -\° ^,-' VERSUS RESPONDENTS :1. Accused 2. i'.r Dhanraj Khiladi, aged about 61 years, S/o Shri Fagua Ram, R/o Village-Mudpar (Dakhni) Daldali P.S. Bharatpur-Narharpur, Tahsil- Narharpur, District-Kanker (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through Police Station-Kanker, District-Kanker (C.G.) Ram Das.aged about 27 years, S/o Mansha Ram, R/o Village- Mudpar (Dakhni), Tahsil- Narharpur, Police Station & District-Kanker (C.G.) APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 482^)F CRLMINAL PROCEDURE CODE ,?r' HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR SB sHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PKITISKERDIWAKBR ''C; CR.M.P. N0. 3 OF2010 PETITIONER Versus RESPONDENTS Dhanraj Khiladi State of Chhattisgarh & Anr. APPEAL UNDERSBCTION 482 OF THB GR.P.C. Shri Raja Ram Tiwari, counsel for fhe petitioner. ShriAjit Siugh, P.L. for the State. ORDER (06.01.2010J Heard. Grievanee of the petitioner is fhat his application Annexure A/l dated 5.12.2005 peiiding before the First Additional Sessions Judge, Kanker has not been decided tfll today. It has been mentioned in fhe preseut petition that the appUcaat is regularly attendiag the court below but Iiis application has not beeri decided aad the applicant is being subjected to harassinent uimeceasarity. He subinits that fhe applicatiou has not beeu decided on fhe ground that fhe origiaal record is before fhis Court. Be that as it niay. It is expected from tiie Court below to decide fhe penduig application ofthe petitioner,ifalready not decided, as expeditiously as possible. The petitioner would be at liberfy to file suitable application before the Court below. With fhe above observation, the petition stands disposed of. ^——— Sd/- ^ritinkerDiwakar Judge _ _