IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21403 of 2010 DINESH MAHTO S/O BADRI MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 19.8.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 376 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was refused bail earlier on merits by an order dated 12.8.2009 vide Cr.Misc.No.18689 of 2009 but has moved his prayer for bail on the ground that there is undue delay in the trial, upon which a report was called for from the trial court. The trial court has reported that all the witnesses except the informant, doctor and I.O. have been examined and effective steps are being taken for the examination of the rest witnesses and it is likely that the trial would be over in two months. In view of such report, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is once again rejected. It is expected that the trial court will conclude the trial within the period it has speculated. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )