IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.6582 of 2010 VEERU KUMAR s/o Late Premdhan Yadav @ Late Bhoti Yadav Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 02.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 395, 412 of the Indian Penal Code, ¾ of the Explosives Substance Act. It has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 9.4.2008 even though he was not named in the First Information Report nor has there been any recovery from his possession and he has not been put on test identification parade. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge, Patna City, in connection with Malsalami P.S. Case No.20 of 2008 (S. Tr. No.1457 of 2008), subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the wife/sister of the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii)That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of - 2 - bail on the ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)