IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 13TH MAY 2011 / 23RD VAISAKHA 1933 WP(C).No. 13163 of 2011(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- RATNAMMA K., JUNIOR PUBLIC HEALTH NURSE GR-II, FAMILY WELFARE CENTRE (FWC), MADHUR (UNDER C.H.C., KUMBALA), P.O.MADHUR, KASARGOD-671 123. BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ SRI.LINDONS C.DAVIS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 3. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER, KASARGOD AT KANHANGAD, P.O.KANHANGAD, KASARGOD-671 315. 4. SUJATHA P., JUNIOR PUBLIC HEALTH NURSE GR-II, COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTRE, BADIADKA, P.O.PARDALA, KASARGOD-671 001. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.T.B.REMANI- R1 TO R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 13163 OF 2011 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of May, 2011 JUDGMENT This Writ Petition has been filed on being aggrieved by Ext.P3 order of transfer whereby the petitioner was transferred from CHC Kumbla to CHC, Mangalpady. In fact, prior to the institution of this Writ Petition, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P4 representation before the first respondent. The petitioner has raised her grievances and contentions against Ext.P3 order of transfer in the said representation. Admittedly, pursuant to Ext.P3 order of transfer, the petitioner was relieved. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the first respondent may be directed to consider Ext.P4 representation and pass appropriate orders thereon. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. Considering the fact that the petitioner has already moved the first respondent raising her grievances against Ext.P3, I do not propose to consider the contentions raised in this Writ Petition, on merits. Therefore, without making any observation as to the merits of the contentions raised in this Writ Petition and also in Ext.P4, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to W.P.(C) NO.13163/2011 2 consider Ext.P4 and pass orders thereon expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) spc W.P.(C) NO.13163/2011 3 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. JUDGMENT September, 2010