IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 28TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 9TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 633 of 2011(D) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------------- K.DEVIPRIYAN, KONUMADATHIL, HARIPPAD, MUTTAM P.O, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SMT.SANDHYA RAJU. RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ----------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, LABOUR DEPARTMENT, TRIVANDRUM – 01. 2. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY IRRIGATION & ADMINISTRATION,TRIVANDRUM – 01. *ADDL. R3 IMPLEADED: 3. THE SOUTH CIRCLE CHIEF ENGINEER, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, ALAPPUZHA – 688 001. *ADDL. R3 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DTD. 20/01/2011 IN I.A. NO. 975/2011. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. SANDESH RAJA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/02/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No. 633 of 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 28th day of February, 2011 J U D G M E N T The counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo which reads as follows: “The petitioner in the above writ petition submits as follows:- 1. It is submitted that I had approached the Hon'ble court with respect to the regularization of employment in the Kerala Water Authority despite government order regularizing the employment some of the temporary staff during the relevant periods. 2. It s humbly prayed that he may be allowed to withdraw the above petition, since there is a chance for settlement.” In view of the same, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition in terms of the memo and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE //True copy// P.A. TO JUDGE shg/