^.^•w—- •- '^ • IN THE HIGH COURT OF 0-UDICATURE AT _JABALPUR Writ Peti-fcion Noe-356 ^2000 ^/o^ petitioner Responden-te.s ^^ '^ ...-"-^ Rara Chandra Singh S/0 Late P^'P, Singh aged about 62 years R/O' Plot NOo 1547^- House No«,177^ Bengali Colony^ Nex^r Khursipar Bhilax 'Disto Duro M<»P^: Versus t t 1@; MoP^Pinancial Corporation a Body duly incorporated under the provision of M^p'^Pinancial Gor- poration Act 1956> having its Head Office at Financial PIouse Bombay Agra Road^ Indore Tahisil •& Dist^ Indore MoP® 2.g»Deputy General Manager^ M^P^ FinaJicial Corporation^ Raipur Zone .(Recovery Ofrice'r) under the provision of M^P^ Lok Dhan (Shodhya Rashiyon Ki Va.suli ) Adhiniyam 1987e chief 3<g>: The State of M^P@ through the/ Secretary ^ Vallabh Bhawan Bhopal MoPo WRIT PETITION UNDSR ART-^226/227 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA •^~^.' ^>- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISO^RH AT BILASPUR PEimQNER WRIT PETITION No. 3367 of2000 Ram Chandra Singti. VERSUS RESPONDENT8 M.P.Fmancial Corporation & Others. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITLTION OFINDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agiu]iotri,J. Preseirt: None fbr the petitioner. Sliri Aiiurag Dayal Slirivastava, Advocate for the respondent No. 1&2 i Shri A.V.Sliridhar, Panel Lawyer fbrthe State/respondent No.3. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 08 day of November, 2010) The matter is called fbr hearing. None appears nor is aiiy representation made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing fhejmatter. In view ofthe above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. Registry is directed to send a copy of this |order to the petitioner, forthwith. \ • Sd/- i SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Amit