IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.23250-M of 2008 Date of decision : 27-01-2009 Sanjeev Kumar ....Petitioner VERSUS Sunita Kumari and Anr. ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. R.C. Kapoor, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Tribhuvan Dahiya, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed by Sanjeev Kumar, husband of respondent No.1 – Sunita Kumari and father of Vashu, respondent No.2. Both respondents had instituted an application u/s 125 Cr.P.C. for grant of maintenance. Concerned Magistrate Jagadhri decided the application and granted ad interim maintenance to both respondents mother and son @Rs.1000/- each. Aggrieved against the same, husband and respondents had also filed revisions in the Court of Addl. Sessions Judge, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri. The Court of Addl. Sessions Judge, Yamuna Nagar dismissed the revision preferred by husband – petitioner but accepted the petition filed by respondents Sunita wife and Vashu son and increased the maintenance awarded by the Magistrate from Rs.1,000/- to Rs.2000/- qua each of the respondent. It is not disputed that petitioner is employed as Assistant Manager in Central Bank of India, Main Branch, Shamli, District Mujaffar Nagar and is drawing a salary of Rs.22,000/- per month. Crl. Misc. No.23250-M of 2008 -2- Sh. R.C. Kapoor, Advocate appearing for petitioner – husband submitted that Sunita Kumari wife is employed in Swami Viveka Nand International School, Jagadhri and as per bank statement Annexure P-4, she is drawing a salary of Rs.3950/- net per month. In the present day for a quality of education of the child and maintenance by both the respondents even it is taken into consideration that wife is getting salary of Rs.4000/-, Rs.8000/- is just adequate for survival. Therefore no interference is warranted. Present petition is dismissed. (KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA) 27-1-2009 JUDGE manju