IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE MONDAY, THE 7TH JANUARY 2008 / 17TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 32441 of 2007(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ 1. ROY C.J., S/O JOSEPH, CHEMMANNUR HOUSE, POOTHOLE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. RAJEEV C.J., S/O JOSEPH, CHEMMANUR HOUSE, CHIYYARAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR DIST. BY ADV. SRI.M.K.DILEEP KUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- THRISSUR CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, CORPORATION BUILDING, THRISSUR, THRISSUR DIST. BY ADV. SRI.K.B.MOHANDAS,SC,THRISSUR CORPORATIO SRI.LELLULAL T.G.THUNDATHIL SRI.K.A.SREEJITH SRI.M.R.DHANIL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ---------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 32441 of 2007 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of January , 2008 JUDGMENT Even though very detailed pleadings have been filed by the parties, I am of the view that the issue is covered directly by Ext.R1(b) and Ext.R1(c) judgments of this court. The petitioners were evicted not for the purpose of construction of a shopping complex instead the eviction was for the purpose of widening the Chembottil Lane. Exts.R1 (b) and (c ) are judgments in cases in which the petitioners therein were evicted for the purpose of widening the Chembottil Lane as in the case of the present petitioners. Following Exts.R1 (b) and Ext.(c) judgment of this court, this writ petition will stand dismissed. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. dpk