CR Nos. 6712 & 6713 of 2011 (O &M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1. CR NO. 6712 of 2011 (o&m) DATE OF DECISION: 3.11.2011 Ram Partap ...Petitioner Versus Municipal Council, Narnaul and others ...Respondents 2. CR NO. 6713 of 2011 (o&m) DATE OF DECISION: 3.11.2011 Ram Partap ...Petitioner Versus Sita Ram and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr.Ajay Jain, Advocate for the petitioners. **** Jitendra Chauhan, J. (Oral) This judgment shall dispose of two Civil Revision petitions, i.e. CR Nos. 6712 & 6713 of 2011, as both the petitions have been filed for setting aside the order dated 15.10.2011 (Annexure P-3) passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Narnaul, vide which the suit has been adjourned sine die. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the suit property, which is subject matter in RSA No. 2209 of 2010, is not the same as in the present suit. Further contends that both the respondents, Sita Ram CR Nos. 6712 & 6713 of 2011 (O &M) 2 and Municipal Council are bent upon creating obstacles in his way so as to prevent him from enjoying the land, which he had purchased for consideration way back, in the year 2000, and to which both the respondents have no right, title or interest. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the case file carefully. The area in dispute between the parties is substantially the same as in the revision petition and RSA No.2209 of 2010, which stands admitted for adjudication. This Court vide order dated 4.4.2011 disposed of CR No. 7597 of 2009 with a direction to both the parties to maintain status quo with respect to the possession during pendency of the suit. The decision of RSA No.2209 of 2010 shall have bearing on the decision of the civil suit and would end the litigation forever regarding the same property. In view of the above, no interference is warranted in the well reasoned finding recorded by learned trial Court. Accordingly, both the revision petitions fail and the same are dismissed in limine. 3.11.2011 (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) gsv JUDGE