IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35210 of 2010 JITENDRA KUMAR SINGH @ JITENDRA SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 12.10.2010. This matter has come at the instance of the court. The order dated 6.10.2010 as pronounced, did not carry certain grammatical corrections carried out in the order granting bail and which has necessitated the present exercise. Let the order dated 6.10.2010 be modified to contain the following corrections; (a) The penal section 393 mentioned in the 4th line of para-2 at page-1 shall read as section 323. (b) The last sentence of the first paragraph at page 3 shall read as follow: “He further submits that in no circumstance, the complainant would like to distance the petitioner from his ailing father.” (C) The second paragraph at page 3 shall read as follows; “Having regard to the submissions of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the complainant as also 2 taking into consideration that the parties are agreeable for return of matrimonial harmony, I am of the opinion that the petitioner can not be kept in incarceration and should be released forthwith to enable the parties to return to their matrimonial home.” (d) The complaint case number mentioned in the last page shall read as follows: “Complaint Case No.250 (C) of 2009.” Let the order dated 6.10.2010 be modified to contain the corrections mentioned hereinabove and be deemed to have been pronounced as such. Let the present order together with the order dated 6.10.2010 be communicated by the office to the court concerned. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J)