In the Punjab and Haryana High Court, at Chandigarh. CRM-M-6528 of 2011 (O&M) Decided on July 14,2011 Sonia --Petitioner vs. State of Punjab --Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.B.D.Sharma,Advocate, for the petitioner Mr.A.S.Rai, DAG,Punjab. Rakesh Kumar Jain,J:(Oral) Prayer is for regular bail in a case pending trial registered vide FIR No.40 dated 19.4.2010 under Sections 302/364/201/120-B/34 of the IPC at Police Station Kartarpur, District Jalandhar. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and is in custody since 29.6.2010. He further submits that DNA profile of the deceased has not been matched. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State submits that it is a case of murder of a child for ransom in which on the disclosure statement of the petitioner, clothes of the deceased child were recovered from the trunk lying in the house of the petitioner. He submits that Parwinder Singh had kidnapped the child on 24.4.2010 for ransom. He has named Charanjit Singh, Avtar Singh, Gurpreet Singh and Sonia (petitioner) and on the disclosure statement of Charan Singh, remains of the deceased child were recovered. It is submitted that DNA profile is not completely ruled out because it is observed by the analyst that in the absence of rib CRM-M-6528 of 2011 (O&M) -2- bones comparison cannot be made. Keeping in view the gravity of the offences, I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of bail to the petitioner. Hence the application is hereby dismissed. July 14,2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge