1 WP No. 1974 /2011gr IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3026 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1051 OF 2011 IN WP/3026/2011 Haeem H.Birwadkar and anr ..Petitioners Versus Joint Charity Commissioner... & anr ..Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3027 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1052 OF 2011 IN WP/3027/2011 Haeem H.Birwadkar and anr ..Petitioners Versus Joint Charity Commissioner... & anr ..Respondents Mr R.V.Govilkar, Advocate for the petitioners in both. Mr.P.K.Dhakephalkar, Sr.Counsel, i/b M/s Uma Sharma Advocate for respondent no.6 in both. Mr R.S.Apte, Sr.Counsel with Mr L.J.Kadri, Advocate for respondent nos 3,4 and 5 in both. Mr A.I.Patel, AGP for respondent nos 1 and 2 in both. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. Date : 15th June, 2011. P.C.: 1. Heard Mr Govilkar appearing on behalf of the petitioners. Perused with his assistance the two interim orders that are made by the Joint T 2 WP No. 1974 /2011gr Charity Commissioner, Greater Mumbai Region, Mumbai on 14.2.2011. These orders are made during the course of deciding certain interim applications. The main Application No.5 of 2009 is pending. In my view, at this stage there is no reason to interfere. I have no doubt in my mind that the Charity Commissioner will abide by the law laid down by this Court in the Full Bench decision in M/s Shailesh Developer's case and also take into account the grievance of the petitioners that the documents in relation to M/s Menorah Realties Pvt Ltd only have been produced and other bidder M/s Sayeban Realtors have not come forward to place their documents for scrutiny and verification of the Charity Commissioner. Similarly, the Trust also has not produced any document so as to enable the Charity Commissioner to verify and compare the credentials and credibility of both bidders. The Charity Commissioner shall take into consideration this grievance and, after hearing all parties, pass final order on the main application. Needless to state that if the final orders are adverse to the petitioners while impugning them the petitioners can also raise appropriate pleas with regard to the observations that have been made in the order dated 14.2.2011. With this clarification, both the petitions are disposed of. In the light of disposal of the writ petitions, the Civil Applications do not survive and are disposed of accordingly. (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.)