t~ i SINGLE BENCH IM THE fflGH COLJRT OF CHtIATTISGARH AT BILASPUR /' WRIT PETITIQNNQ. _ SP 33 / 2006 ;-%^'i .-Ix PETITIONER ^^ ^"•c°..;>..•• sAS°" ..•'f'vp^-' "" " ^^Mi" ^^s^y :K.L. Gandarv S/o Late Toranlal Gandarv Aged about 4C| years ..-•"^\\ll> R/o- Civil Line, Khairagarh, 1- Khairagarh, Dist- Rajnandgoan (C.G) ^^%^"" Versiis RESPONDENTS •K "Tfi^^ Uf.^ •*.w B ^VW8a" "•'•V % ^\ /:.< i.^ .•f's- '^^vsS;a:^y StaTe of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Public Works Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G) ChiefEngineer PWD, Depaitment D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G) Executive Engineer PWD (B&R) Khairagarh Division, Khairagarh.(C.G) G.R.Sahu Working as Grade-III PWD (B&R) Khairagarh Division, Khairagarh(C.G) > / WRIT PETITIQN UiSlDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF_THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA_FQR.ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE WRIT ORDER OF DIRECTION TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. XI-HC-78 HrqWTSb*11<*» 3^ '^nw^, w-Stww, fat?iiy^< .^).'..'pl..so^, W=[ 200^ 3ll^Si|'4sl<»l(4?l'd°<'^'ir) 3ii^r?!rR-ii°b am3T^!*t) '-<-; STTOKgfersn^r 30-6-2006 <3ovt Articte Lejbal Mr. H.S. Ahluwalia, counsel ftj Mr. Satish Gupte, Deputy No.1 to 3. Heard. By this writ petition under the petitioner has questioned the Executive Engineer, PWD Division| been posted as Stock Clerk & Bhawan, Work charge of Legal Matt^ The case of the petitioner is i in PWD, Division: Khairagarh since| 27-5-2006 (Annexure P-1) has bee() of seat amongst the employees o< arbitrary, unconstitutional and withotit petitioner joined the post of Auditor) compteted three years tenure on th( (Annexure P-2), respondent No.3 27-5-2006 in respect of aliotment | respondent No.4. The petitioner ^i (Annexure P-3) regarding the dis towards the petitioner in comparison| Leamed counse! for the peti( ailowed to make a fresh represen< grievances, and in turn, respondenl which iearned counset appearing f^i objection. 'owfa'sfl-) iiK<iTffteI^'<Ri+<i<, ^srf^iTsn^T r the petitioner. ovt. Advocate for the State/respondents 226/227 of the Constitution of India, [order dated 27-5-2008 passed by the Khairagarh, whereby the petitioner has Matters from the post of Ankekshak ^rs, Form-51. jthat he is working as Assistant Grade-tll, 1-1-1981 and the impugned order dated passed by respondent No.3 for change PWD, Khairagarh, which is manifestly approva! of the higher authorities. The I on 23-9-2003 and the petitioner has not same post. Vide order dated 12-6-2006 liade correction to his earlier order dated [of nature of work to the petitioner and lubmitted a representation on 15-6-2006 lcriminatory attitude of the respondents |to other employees. poner submits that the pstitioner may be ^tion to respondent No.3 raising all his No.3be directed to decide the same, to |r the State/respondents No.1 to 3 has no XI-HC-78 *1I*1WI Sh*1icb 'ssf '*ii'i<iii<i, »Tn<ri<o, Ridioy ..^^^m^^, . ^ 3)1^14a«»>(l?i^°"i.'sr) STI^r^T^TO tWrai^isbKi* <c Soma '*, ^ ^, 5?iTTW?rfi!(T3TI^T 2- Having heard learned couns^! facts and cireumstances of the casel, the petitioner is just, fair andreason^bte. to make a representetion to responfdent turn.respondent No.3 shall decidel days from the date of its receipt, in 4< points raised by the petitioner. With the direction aforesaid, t(ie In view of this order, M.(W|)P. also stand disposed of. Parties are entitled for certifie^ »]<i?«<fl-)tiiticil'^'te^iRi^ii ^TSTf^ir^n^T for the parties and having regard to the the prayer made by tearned counsel for abte. Therefore, the petitioner is allowed No.3 within 10 days from today, in the representation within a period of 30 iccordance with law, after considering the petition stands disposed of. .No.2366/2006 and I^.No.6201/2006 copy of this order. S&l- ^.c.^ado° 3udSe