IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25483 of 2010 UPENDRA SHARMA @ HARKHU SHARMA, SON OF NEMANI SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 16.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that looted Mobile was recovered from the possession of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is made clear that the petitioner’s case shall not be bifurcated for purposes of framing of charge and in case it is done, the petitioner’s prayer for bail shall not be considered. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)