IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05.02.2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.No.34014 of 2006 (O.A.No.9882 of 1998) T.Subramanian ... Petitioner/Applicant Vs 1.The Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Chennai-9. 2.The Commissioner of Survey and Settlement, Chepauk, Chennai-5. ... Respondents/Respondents Prayer: Writ petition came to be numbered by transfer of O.A.No.9882 of 1998 on the file of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal filed under Article 226 of Constitute of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus praying to call for the records in pursuant to the impugned order passed by the IInd Respondent in Proc.Na.Ka.R1/60186/95 (Nee.Aa) dated 4.1.96 and the impugned order of confirmation issued by the Ist Respondent in G.O.(1D) No.393 Revenue Department dated 20.8.97 and quash these orders and consequently direct these Respondents to regularise the services of the Petitioner/Applicant with effect from 13.5.65 in the post of Junior Draftsman with all attendant benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.S.M.Subramaniam For Respondents : Mr.B.Vijay, G.A. ORDER Prayer in the writ petition is to call for the records in pursuant to the impugned order passed by the IInd Respondent in Proc.Na.Ka.R1/60186/95 (Nee.Aa) dated 4.1.96 and the impugned order of confirmation issued by the Ist Respondent in G.O.(1D) No.393 Revenue Department dated 20.8.97 and quash these orders and consequently direct these Respondents to regularise the services of the Applicant with effect from 13.5.65 in the post of Junior Draftsman with all attendant benefits. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that his claim for regularisation in the post of junior draftsman from the date of initial appointment has been disposed of by the Assistant Director of Survey, Trichirapalli and the appeal has also been disposed of. The petitioner filed review petition and the same is pending before the first respondent/ Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Chennai.9. He pleads that the same may be considered and disposed of on merits within a reasonable time. 3. As stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner, if the review is pending before the first respondent, the said authority is directed to consider and dispose of the review within a reasonable time preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the review has already been disposed of, the same shall be intimated to the petitioner to work out his remedy in accordance with law. This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar /True Copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar ra To 1. The Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Chennai-9. 2. The Commissioner of Survey and Settlement, Chepauk, Chennai-5. +1 CC to Government Pleader Advocate SR.7772/10 W.P.No.34014 of 2006 (O.A.No.9882 of 1998) RS1 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/