1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2854 OF 2009 Sou.Ranjana Keshrinath Thakur and others. ..Petitioners Vs Smt.Veena Yashwant Patil and ors. .. Respondents Mr.P.S.Dani, for petitioners. Mr.J.M.D’silva, for respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM : D. B. BHOSALE, J. DATE : 30/07/2009 PC: Heard Mr.Dani, learned counsel for petitioners and Mr.J.M.D’Silva, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3. 2. This petition is directed against an order dated 22nd January, 2009 passed by the District Court in Misc. Civil Appeal No.110 of 2008 by which the appeal filed by respondents – plaintiffs came to be allowed. However, no order of injunction in favour of the respondents-plaintiffs was passed. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and order of the District Court, the petitioner – defendants filed the present petition. 3. This Court while issuing notices on 18th March, 2009 2 directed the parties to maintain status-quo as on the date of order with regard to the suit property. Learned Counsel for the parties fairly stated that the writ petition may be disposed of without recording reasons and they have agreed for following order : (a)The trial Court shall endeavor to dispose the Regular Civil Suit No.54 of 2008 as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of one and half year from today on merits in accordance with law and uninfluenced by the observations made in the orders passed by the courts below. (b)The order of status-quo granted by this Court dated 18th March, 2009 shall remain operative dill the disposal of suit. 4. With these observations writ petition is disposed of. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)