IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 18TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 27TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 30760 of 2011(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- JOSE BABY, S/O.BABY, AGED 36 YEARS, MEELOOTTU VILAYIL HOUSE, PIDAVOOR.P.O., PAZHANJIKADAVU WARD, PIDAVOOR VILLAGE, PATHANAPURAM TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI. K.SHAJ SRI.SAJJU.S SRI.PRAVEEN THOMAS ABRAHAM RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, AMARJYOTHI BUILDING, KADAPPAKKADA, KOLLAM. 2. THALAVOOR GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THALAVOOR.P.O., PIN-691 514. 3. ELIZABETH JOHN, W/O.JOHN, PLAVILA HOUSE, PANAMATTA WARD, THALAVOOR GRAMA PANCHAYAT. 4. JOHN @ MANOJ, PLAVILA HOUSE, PANAMATTA WARD, THALAVOOR GRAMA PANCHAYAT. SRI.M.K.CHANDRAMOHANDAS, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.30760/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1- THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 2/11/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2- THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 2/11/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 30760 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 18th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T According to the petitioner, the industrial units of respondents 3 and 4 are functioning without necessary consent obtained from the 1st respondent. It is his case that now they have made applications, and that, on coming to know of the same, he has filed Ext.P1 before the 1st respondent. In this writ petition, what is sought for is a direction for its consideration. 2. I heard the standing counsel appearing for the respondents also. 3. If as stated by the petitioner, an application has been made for consent, it is necessary that the same is liable to be considered in accordance with the provisions of the Environment (Protection) Act and the related laws. Now that an objection in the nature of Ext.P1 is also received, it is directed that when orders are passed, the same may also be duly adverted to. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp //True Copy// PA to Judge