IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9695 of 2009 SHIV NANDAN YADAV, son of Late Garbhu Prasad Yadav, resident of Village Belo, Police Station Murliganj, District Madhepura. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The Director, Panchayati Raj Directorate, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Madhepura. 4. Block Development Officer, Madhepura. ----Respondents ----------- For the Petitioner : M/S Uday Chand Prasad, Binod Kumar Sinha & Manoj Kumar,Advocates For the S t a t e : G.P.IX ------- 2. 17.8.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite superannuating on 31st of March, 2007 on the post of Panchayat Secretary under the Block Development Officer, Madhepura, no retiral dues have been paid to him in spite of representing the matter before the authorities concerned. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submits that in case the petitioner files a fresh representation stating the details of his claims, the same would be considered without delay. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as raised in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the District Magistrate, Madhepura (respondent no.3). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of the 2 claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents in support of his claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the respondent no.3 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation and dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the admitted retiral dues could be paid to the petitioner without further delay. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)