CRM-M-6167 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-6167 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 03.05.2011 Abid ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Sushil Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Present petition is filed seeking regular bail in case FIR No.246 dated 26.7.2009 under Sections 392/397 IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act (Sections 395/412 IPC and Sections 54 and 59 Arms Act added subsequently), Police Station Kundli, District Sonepat. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner has been in custody since 3.8.2009. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, has stated that all the prosecution witnesses have been examined except the one witness i.e owner of the vehicle, who can be examined at any time, therefore, this is not the stage to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner, while taking me to Annexure P-6 page 31 has argued that even at the time of disposal of CRM-M-6167 of 2011 (O&M) -2- bail application of Faisal by this Court vide order dated 17.2.2011, same arguments were advanced by learned State counsel that entire evidence would be concluded on 15.2.2011, however, it was not done. Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that despite of several dates fixed thereafter, prosecution has failed to conclude the evidence Co-ordinate Bench of this Court has granted bail to co- accused Faisal vide order dated 17.2.2011 on the ground that prosecution has failed to conclude the evidence. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, petition is allowed. Let petitioner be released on bail to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. (Alok Singh) Judge May 03, 2011 R.S.