IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No: 22671 of 1999 Between: K.V. Reddy, S/o. Venkat Reddy, E.No. 91465, R/o. 1-4-51/1, Saradhinagar, Khammam, Khammam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 A.P.S.R.T.C., Rep. by its Diputy Chief Traffic Manager, O/o. Regional Manager, Khammam. 2 Depot Manager, Kothagudem Depot, A.P.S.R.T.C., Kothagudem. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate, writ order or direction more particularly in the nature of a writ of Certiorari calling for the records in and connected with proceedings of the Dy. Chief Traﬃc Manager, Khammam, dt. 22.4.99 issued by the 1st respondent C.No. Steno/19(79) /98-Dy. CTM, KMM and case No. E2/1(30)/96, KTDM, dt. 29.9.96 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant all consequential benefits and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.T.K.SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: SMT.P.RAJANI REDDY The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed questioning order dated 22-04-1999 passed by the appellate authority in the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner but however no copy of the order of his removal from the service passed by the disciplinary authority is placed on record. When the matter has come up for hearing on 10-09-2008, it was adjourned enabling the counsel for petitioner to ﬁle a copy of the removal of the petitioner from service passed by the disciplinary authority. It appears from the record that till date no such copy is ﬁled as ordered and there is also no representation when the matter is called. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 22nd October 2008 CVRK