ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 2876 OF 2009 PETITION NO. 2876 OF 2009 PETITION NO. 2876 OF 2009 WITH WITH WITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.2877 OF 2009 PETITION NO.2877 OF 2009 PETITION NO.2877 OF 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.R.S.Ghadage i/by Mr.A.S. Desai for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 30th March, 2009 : 30th March, 2009 : 30th March, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. . The Writ Petition No.2876 of 2009 is filed by the Petitioner-Upsarpanch of village Karambale, Tq. Gadhinglaj, District Kolhapur and the Writ Petition No.2877 of 2009 is filed by the Petitioner-Sarpanch of village Karambale, Tq. Gadhinglaj, District Kolhapur, thereby they have challenged two different orders passed under Section 35(3) of the Bombay Village Panchayat Act-1958 (for short, "the Act") whereby confirmed the order dated 08/12/2008 passed by the Additional Collector of Kolhapur, of the no confidence motion passed against them. ( 2 ) 2. The Additional Collector, after considering the merits of the matter and the record held that no confidence motion is passed against the Petitioners- Appellants with required majority i.e. 2/3 prescribed under the Act and the Rules made thereunder. It is further held that Tahasildar have followed the mandatory provisions and therefore, maintained the order of no confidence motion. 3. After hearing the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners and after considering the whole record and the reasoning given by the Additional Collector and confirmed by the Divisional Commissioner Pune Division, Pune, I see there is no reason to interfere with the same order. There is no perversity. The impugned order is within the framework of law and the record. 4. Resultantly, both the Writ Petitions are, dismissed. No costs. ( 3 ) [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]