AB 1477/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.GOSWAMI Heard Mr KK Mahanta, learned senior counsel for the petitioners and Mr B B Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. Also heard Mr G Alam, lear ned counsel who has entered appearance on behalf of the complainant. Mr Gogoi has made available the Case Diary for the perusal of the Court. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on consideration o f the materials available in the Case Diary, I am inclined to extend the privile ge of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner Nos. 2,3 and 4, namely, Sri Sada Das, Sm t. Dayawati Das and Sri Lakshi Kanta Das. Accordingly, it is provided that in th e event of arrest of the aforenamed persons in connection with Jamuguri P.S. Ca se No.43/2011 u/s 498(A)/326 IPC, they shall be released on bail of Rs. 15,000/- with one surety of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the arresting au thority on condition that they shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called for and shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to d issuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. However, so far as the petitioner No.1, namely, Sri Prasanna Das is conc erned, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of pre-arrest bail to him. The p rayer for pre-arrest bail made by the petitioner No.1 is, therefore, rejected. Bail application stands disposed of in the above terms.