1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1567 OF 2010 Ashik Ali Abid Ali & Anr. )..Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra )..Respondent ---- Mr. M.V.Holamagi for the applicants. Mrs. M.H.Mhatre APP for the State. Mr.R.B.Dixit for the original complainant. ---- Coram : R.S.MOHITE,J Date : 16th April, 2010 PC 1 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail. The applicants are shown as accused in C.R.No.4/2010 registered by the Taloja police station for alleged offences under Sections 407, 420, 467 & 468 of IPC. The incident in question has taken place on 23.11.2009. The crime has been registered on the complaint made on 4.1.2010 by one Kuldeep Singh. It is the case of the complainant that he is in the steel business and running his business from Kalamboli. That applicant no.1 was also in the same business and on 23.11.2009 when the complainant was away on the business tour to Delhi, applicant no.1 phoned him and requested him to supply 30 metric tones of galvanize sheets. As the complainant did not have sufficient stock in his go-down, complainant requested one Mr.Niyaz to deliver the said 30 metric tones of galvanize sheets to the applicant no.1. The said Niyaz Choudhary told the complainant that he will give the instructions to the owner of his go-down to deliver the said quantity to applicant no.1. In short, it is the case of the 2 complainant that applicant no.1 deputed applicant no.2 to go to the go-down of Mr.Ganesh and to collect the material. Applicant no.1 told the complainant that he will be sending a cheque of Rs.15 lakhs along with delivery chalan. However, applicant no.2 mis-led the go- down keeper. Material has thereafter been taken away and sold to a trader in Gujarat by name Shyambhai. In the aforesaid background, it is a matter of utmost urgency that the investigation to be made about the whereabouts of the material and the whereabouts of the people to whom the material have allegedly been sold in Gujrat. Not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail. Hence, application is rejected. Advocate for the applicants seeks time to approach the Apex Court and seeks protection. The prayer is rejected. (R.S.MOHITE,J) 3