IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P. No.196 of 2008 Date of Decision:- 08.02.2008 Jaswant Singh & another ....Petitioner(s) through Mr.R.K.Arora, Advocate vs. Darshan Singh ....Respondent(s) *** CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. *** 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? *** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) The petitioners have filed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of an order dated 17.10.2007 passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sultanpur Lodhi in the proceedings under Section 145/146 Cr.P.C. whereby a Receiver was appointed. This Court vide order dated December 3, 2007, has stayed operation of the said order. In deference to the interim order passed by this Court, the SDM, Sultanpur Lodhi has already withdrawn the order appointing the Receiver (Annexure P-10). The petitioners, however, allege that despite the withdrawal of the aforesaid order, the respondent with whom they have a property dispute, is interfering with their possession. I am afraid that even if the allegations made by the petitioners are taken to be correct, it does not amount to wilful or deliberate disobedience of this Court's order dated December 03, 2007; hence, no C.O.C.P. No.196 of 2008 -2- contempt proceedings can be initiated against the respondent. However, the petitioners shall be at liberty to have an alternative recourse to the remedy as may be available in law in order to seek protection of their alleged possession over the subject property. Dismissed. February 08, 2008 ( SURYA KANT ) poonam JUDGE