K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.104 OF 2009 APPEAL NO.104 OF 2009 APPEAL NO.104 OF 2009 IN IN IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2523 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2523 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2523 OF 2007 IN IN IN SUIT NO.1854 OF 2007 SUIT NO.1854 OF 2007 SUIT NO.1854 OF 2007 Austin Jerome Rodrigues )..Appellant Vs. Sabastian Alias Khaitan Francis ) D’Mello & Ors. )..Respondents ---- Mrs.E.A.Gonsalves for the appellant. Mr.A.C.Singh i/by D.R.Shah for respondent nos.11 to 15. ---- Coram : D.K.Deshmukh & Coram : D.K.Deshmukh & Coram : D.K.Deshmukh & R.S.Mohite,JJ R.S.Mohite,JJ R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 6.5.2009. PC 1. It is obvious that the plaintiff who is seeking temporary injunction on the basis of his alleged title does not really have any valid document of title. The sale deed is executed by the plaintiff in his own favour, on the basis of the power of attorney alleged to have been executed by the predecessor in title in favour of the plaintiff. We have read the original of the power of attorney. It appears to be a developed document. Admittedly, the : 2 : power of attorney is not registered. In our opinion, plaintiff is not entitled to seek interim relief. Therefore, no exception can be taken to the order impugned. Appeal dismissed. In view of dismissal of the appeal, Notice of Motion does not survive and disposed of accordingly. (D.K.Deshmukh,J) (D.K.Deshmukh,J) (D.K.Deshmukh,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J)