1 10 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITON NO.2713/2006. Surendra Kumar Ranka Vs. Mahendra Kumar Date of Order :: 20th February 2009. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr. Pawan Deval for Dr. Sachin Acharya, for the petitioner. Mr. Hemant Jain ] Mr. R.K. Bohra ], for the respondents. ..... BY THE COURT: Though the matter has been listed for orders on the application (IA No. 14948/2008) seeking substitution of the legal representatives of the petitioner Surandra Kumar Ranka S/o Bhuralal Ranka who is said to have died on 01.05.2008, it is stated by the learned counsel for the respondents that the concerned civil suit itself having been decided on 07.04.2008, this writ petition is practically rendered infructuous. Perusal of the records makes out that this writ petition has been filed essentially in relation to the orders passed by the subordinate Courts in regard to provisional determination of rent that had obviously been the matter relating to the interim orders during the pendency of the suit. When the suit itself has been decided, this petition, relating to the interim order, could only be treated to be infructuous. To put the record straight , the application (IA No. 14948/2008) seeking substitution of the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner is allowed and the named legal representatives are ordered to be substituted as the petitioners in place of deceased petitioner. However, for the reasons foregoing, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. 2 (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. Mohan/