WP(C) 2080/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. R.K. Malakar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr . Patowary, learned standing counsel PWD, appearing for all the respondents. The grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that pursuant to various work orders issued by the respondents, though he has completed the w ork to the satisfaction of all concerned, an amount of Rs.2,78,150/- is still re main unpaid out of the total bill amount in respect of total 12 work orders issu ed. The learned counsel appearing for the parties have submitted that the ma tter in issue has already been answered in Tamsher Ali Vs. State of Assam and or s. reported in 2008(4) GLT 1 and as such the writ petition may be disposed of as per the direction contained in the said judgment. In view of the aforesaid submission and keeping in view the facts and ci rcumstances of this case, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the dire ctions contained in Tamsher Ali’s case. The claim of the petitioner shall be scr utinized by the Chief Engineer, PWD and upon such scrutiny if any amount is foun d to be due and payable, the petitioner’s name shall be registered in the approp riate list maintained by the authority and thereafter shall pay the petitioner i n terms of the position in such list. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.