IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATU’RE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTIsGARH) WRIT PETITION No.:- 46 4A 4’ 2004. S.B. PETITIONER ¢ Naimul Haque Ansari, Age:— 45 Yrs WA S/ O Late Kamruddin Ansari,. Workgng in the Post of Circle Organiser,B.O. Udaipur, District Sarguja [C.G.] *‘ $\\‘\ 4? “gt w ¢ a'o‘“ —' -: V E R S U S :- v RESPONDENTS:- 1 The State of Chhattisgarh x Through ThePrincipal-Secretary, General Administration 8a Tribal Welfare D.K.S. Mantralaya Bhavan ’ Raipur, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 2sf’l‘he Asstt‘ Commisioher,i-‘* ~ H ¥ r Tribal Welfare Ambikapur District Sarguja [C.G.] 3. The Chief Executive Ofticer,Janpad Panchayat, Udaipur, Dist- Sarguja { C.G.] 4. The Block Education Officer, Block Oflice , Udaipur , Distt. Sarguja [C.G.] RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 227 OF T E CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE DIRECTION(S) OR ORDER(S). —w : v ....... , . W On a mention being made, me case is taken up for hearing. Mr. Azad Siddique, counse! for the petitioner. Mr. Akhii Agrawai, Panel L er for the State/respondents. By this writ petition under rticie 226/227 of the Constitution of India. the petitioner has questioned th propriety of order dated 31‘“ July, 2004. whereby he has been transfer d from Primary 'Schooi, Semighaghara, Udaipur to Primary School, Sanva Ranva, Bhaiyathan. The case of the petitioner i that in the year 1986 he was appointed as Primary Teacher in Primary Sc ooi, Pakani, District: Surajpur, and in the year 1995 vide order dated 6e 995 he was transferred to Primary School, Semi—Ghoghara, Udaipur. On coount of the vacancy avaiiable, he was transferred as Circle Organizer Udaipur. in the Office of Biook Education Ofhcer vide order dated 4-9-19 6 by the Coilector, Surguja. Thereafter‘ again, the petitioner was transfe red to Semi-Ghoghara, Udaipur, and he is working as a Trained Circ'le Or anizer. Block Office: Udaipur in the Tribal Welfare (Education), Ambikapur, since 1999, and he has been transferred vide the impugned order. The petitioner was discharging his duties with utmost honesty and devotion. bu even then he has been transferred in the mid session, which is an illegal and arbitration action. The petitioner has been relieved ex-parte vide order ated 6-1 1-2004. - mi have heard teamed coun ei for the parties. Learned counsel for the itioner submits that the petitioner’s mother is old and there is nobody to loo after her, therefore, the respondents ought to have considered the repres tation of the petitioner, but they are not ' oonsidering the same, therefore the petitioner may be allowed to make a 9- t XI—HC—22 x L; WW mm WWW WW§WW mm $Wm 11-4-2005 XI-HC-22 WW mm WW§WW aamm, mmmW ..z«» reprezsentation to respondent N92 to which ieamed Panel Lawyer for the State of Chhattisgarh has no objection , Having heard ieamed counsel for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is allowed to make a detaiied represenmtion to respo dent No.2 within a period of ten days from today and in tum, respondent 0.2 ie directed to decide the same within another one month thereof in an obieotive manner after considering the grievances of the petitioner. in a ordance with iaw. With the direction’aforesa ‘, the petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.)P. c.4954/2004 and l.A.No.9257/2004 also stand disposed of. Parties are entitled for cert med copy of this order. M i l * Medea)