IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT:: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.No.2987 OF 2008 Between: A.Hemalatha …Petitioner A n d B.Subbaraju Gupta and another ..Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.No.2987 OF 2008 ORDER: This civil revision petition is directed against the order dated 27.03.2008 in I.A.No.89 of 2008 in M.V.O.P.No.1245 of 2005, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-VI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kurnool, wherein the said application filed by the petitioners herein, seeking amendment of the claim application by enhancing the amount from Rs.1 lakh to Rs.2 lakhs, was dismissed. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents. Perused the record. 3. The claimants filed M.V.O.P.No.1245 of 2005 claiming compensation of Rs.1 lakh on account of death of the deceased Nagaraj Babu Subramanyam Gupta, who is husband of the 1st petitioner and father of petitioners 2 to 4 and son of 5th petitioner. It is stated that the enquiry into the claim is not yet commenced. The petitioners merely sought amendment of the amount claimed by them from Rs.1 lakh to Rs.2 lakhs. 4. There cannot be any tenable objection for permitting the petitioners to amend the claim inasmuch as the question as to what could be the just and reasonable compensation payable will have to be considered by the Tribunal on evidence that may be let in during the course of enquiry. The petitioners are, therefore, permitted to amend the claim application as prayed for, subject to payment of additional Court fee. The impugned order is set aside. 5. In the result, the civil revision petition is allowed accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 12th July, 2011 Lrkm.