f C f-(^^ CP In the Hon'ble Hish Court of Judicature nf r'hhattisearh at BUasnur rC.G.V W.P.NO. <T^&K 2006 c?)^>"^u Petitioner ,Y J^/ i^y y ./w- 4W ./yy ^^•7 <^ ^ R^snondents '<y Mitthulal Sahu, aged 48 years, / Son ofShri Aghaiiuram Sahu, Assistaat Teacher, Govt. Pnmary School, Purai, R/o viUage - Aanda, Tahsfl & Dista-ict Durg (C.G.) VERSUS -1. The State Govemment of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department Mmistry, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipui (C.G.) 2. District Education OfGcer, Durg,. 3. Block Education OfGcer,Q DistrictDurg (C.G.) 's^ WritPetttwn Under Articles 226/227 of The Constitution Oflndia for the issuance of WRIT in the nature ofMANDAMUS certiorari, Prohibition and for other suitable writ or writs, order or orders, direction or directions. The petitioner most respectfully fimushes the particulars ofthe writ petition as under: - --^ HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P.fs) No. 5068 of 2006 Petitioner Mitthutal Sahu Respondents Versus The State fiovernment of Chhattisgarh &others Sir^le Bench; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. -*w Shri Ajay Shrivostava, Advocate for the Petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, t)y. 6ovt. Advocate for the respondents/State. OftbER (18th September, 2006) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that while working as Assistant Teacher, the petitioner has gone on training to improve his quoiifications on his own expenses and acquired B.T.I. Examination Cer-tificate in the yea" 1992 from tS the Board of Higher Secondary- Education, Mcdhya Pradesh, Bhopal. According to leamed counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitted to two advoaice increments in view of the decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (2006 CTI) MPJR-C6 96}. This Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), came to the conctusion that the teacher's, who had obtained B.T.I. Examination Certificate on his own expen»s,are covered by the circubr dated 24.12.98 (Annewire P/2) issued by the State Sovernment of AAadhya Pradesh ,,/ 3. Learned counsel for tiie petitioner furtiier submits that the E. ' facts and question of !aw involved in the present case are squareiy coverec! by decision of this Court in the case of Yashwont Kumar Bharodwaj Vs. Municipa! Corporation, Qwq and ano-ttier (Supra), to which learned counsel appearing for the respondents fairiy concedes and agrees with the ayerment made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 4. Accordin9ty, the writ petition is allowed in terms of ttie order passed in the case of Yashwcmt Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporqtion, Durg cmd another (Supra), subject to verifiastion of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B.T.I. Examination Certificate on his own expen%s or not. No order ..ls~-- os to costs. s<u- SatfebK.AS"ihom Judge ThakLir ';^^?^&^®a