^^— ^a ^ ^ Mgis Bsns^ Before Hon'ble Hish Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur W. P 4-3>^ 8 2004 /' Petitioner :- jShri Ramdas Bhandekar, Patwari ^ ^' S/o Shri Kalluram Bhandekar, \%^' ^••^ yy' ..-•••yy ^:w ^'^/ ^y Respondent aged about 30 years H.Q. Village Piparchhali, Tahsil Balod, P.C. Circle 15, District Durg (C.G.) vs State Government of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) Writ Petition Under Article 226/227 of Constitution of India :- /" _i_ ^r: Petitioner most humbly submit as under:- -^- XI..HC--78 w^r^rf^TNF- "^SH '3?T^?T^RNr St Gowri ^flW^TW^Icb ^^ ^ww^, ^ti1^4i<o, f®i<qs^^< (^f L|^^^ "^ 200 <flff^TTr?RR> (yil^<s<<^r) ^T^TW^rf^ OT^I 08-12-2004 Shri Ajay Shrivastava, counsell forthe petitioner. Shri V.V. S. Murthy, Dy. A.^ for the State. ^>plication for urgent hearing] ^ ^{H<n? ^ 'fexst <p»1^1< '^3?fTO3T?^T with Shri At^iil Agrav^t. Panel Lawyer is allowed. Heard. Leamed counsel for the petffoner submits that ttie matter retetes to transfer of the petrtioner. He furth^r submits that the petitioner has been working as Patwari in P.C. Circte N^.15, T^hsil Balod, DistrictDurg. Healso submits that the petlttoner has beert transferred from Distrtet Durg to District Dhamtari vide Annexure-P/1. H©sjlso submits that the Patwari cannot be transferred inter-district wise. Hej also submite that for the present ttie petitioner may be given an opportt^nity of ftling the deteiled representetion before the competent authority ofth^ respondents, whteh shall be constdered on its own merits in accordance withllaw. Having considered and with< of the case, in the opinion of this direction is given to the petitioner |ut expressing any opinion on ttie merite ?ourt, ends of justice will be served if a o mak®a detailod representation raising his grievances before the competer^t authority of the respondents along with a copy of the petition and thisjorder, within 15 days, and on such representation being filed, the com^etent authority of the respondents shatt decide the same on its own mer|ts jn accordgnce with tew as earty as possible preferably wthin two m<t>nths from the date of recei^ of ttie representation. Learned counsd for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not been relieved. He prays that the petifloner may be allowed to continue. It is directed that if the pe^tioner has not been reliewd and ottier person has not joined jn ptace of th^ petitioner, the petitioner may be allowed to continue tilt the representation Jis decided. It is made clear th^ if th» petitjoner has already been relievejct or other pereon has already joir^d in pjace of the petitioner, this order w(l not entitte the petitioner to rejoin at the eariier piace of posting. With the aforesaid observatio{i, this petition stancts disposed of. Consequently, M.W.P.No.47<^9/2004 also stands dteposed^L Certified copy as per rutes. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge •^ .r^c-A