IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.62 of 2007 UPENDRA YADAV … PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. BAIJU YADAV 3. RAM CHANDER YADAV 4. BASUDEO YADAV 5. ASHOK YADAV 6. ANAND YADAV 7. JAINANDAN YADAV 8. HARINANDAN YADAV …OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 06. 20.08.2010 Petitioner is the informant of the case giving rise to Sessions Trial No.146/1997 which ended in acquittal. It appears that out of four witnesses produced on behalf of prosecution, P.Ws. 3 & 4 were declared hostile. P.W.1 the own brother of the petitioner candidly stated in his deposition that he had not seen the incident and a Marpit had taken place on account of land disputes. Admittedly, the informant of the case, the Investigating Officer and the doctor who examined the injured(s) have not been examined by the prosecution, although sufficient opportunity was given to it. Learned court has drawn adverse inference. In the backdrop of these facts emanating from the records, the order of acquittal has been recorded. This Court does not find any merit in this application which is accordingly dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )