IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.R.UDAYABHANU WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 23RD KARTHIKA 1929 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 853 of 1999(M) ------------------------------ CC.207/1994 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-I, KANNUR .................... REVN. PETITIONER: ------------------ MANOJ, S/O.ACHUTHAN, M., MANDIYAN HOUSE, SOUTH MANAL, CHALAD, KANNUR-14. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.PAREETH RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. P.K.RAGESH, S/O.GOVINDAN, PEON, AGED 30 YEARS, PUTHIYARAMBATH HOUSE, PANHIKKAL, P.O. CHALAD, KANNUR-14. 2. K.ROOPESH, S/O.BHARATHAN, AGED 25 YEARS, KALLALAL HOUSE, P.O.CHALAT, KANNUR-14. 3. P.P.SUNIL, S/O.SHEKARAN, AGED 25 YEARS, PUTHIYARAMBATH HOUSE, SOUTH MANAL, CHALAT, KANNUR-14. 4. A.RAMAN ALIAS RAMAKRISHNAN, S/O.KELAN, DRIVER, AGED 37 YEARS, ATHILAT HOUSE, SOUTH MANAL, CHALAT P.O., KANNUR 14. Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 853 of 1999(M) 5. A.SAJEEVAN, S/O.RAMAN, AGED 33 YEARS, ARAYAKANDY HOUSE, SOUTH MANAL, CHALAT P.O., KANNUR-14. 6. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.RAVISANKAR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SRI C.K.SURESH THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.R.UDAYABHANU, J. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Crl. R.P.No.853 of 1999-B ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dated this the 14th day of November, 2007 O R D E R The revision petitioner is the de facto complainant in C.C.No.207/1994 with respect to the offences alleged under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 324 and 326 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code against the accused, five in number. Accused 1 and 2 were found guilty and convicted for the offences under Sections 341 and 324 I.P.C only. Rest of the accused were acquitted. It is seeking enhancement of sentence and conviction for the other offence that the revision has been filed. It is submitted that during the pendency of this revision, accused 1 and 2 had filed appeal which was dismissed and subsequently revision was filed before this Court and during the pendency of the revision petition No.3303/2005, the matter has been settled out of court and the case against accused 1 and 2 were compounded under Section 380(2) Cr.P.C. In the circumstances, the counsel for the revision petitioner has submitted that the matter may be closed. The revision petition is accordingly closed. K.R.UDAYABHANU, Judge ms