THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.22543 of 2010 ORDER: According to the petitioners, the third respondent, suppressing her earlier marriage with one B.K.Ravinder, compelled the first petitioner to marry her. As the first petitioner abstained for a week from the company of the third respondent, the third respondent lodged a complaint before the Station House Officer, Malkajgiri Police Station, by making false allegations, based on which, a case in Crime No.268 of 2008 was registered under Sections 498-A, 494 and 420 I.P.C. The grievance of the petitioners is that at the instance of the third respondent, respondents 1 and 2 are harassing them and interfering with their personal liberty, without following due process of law. A counter-affidavit has been filed on behalf of the first respondent-Assistant Commissioner of Police, Malkajgiri Police Station stating that based a complaint given by the third respondent, a case in Crime No.268 of 2008 for the offences under Sections 498-A and 494 I.P.C was registered on the file of Malkajgiri Police Station, against the petitioners; that after completion of investigation, the police filed charge sheet, which was taken on file by X Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Malkajgiri vide C.C.No.890 of 2005 and the same is pending trial; that based on another complaint given by Smt.Manchala Indumathi and Smt.Javvadi Jayashri @ Asha Rani, a case in Crime No.171 of 2008 under Section 3(i)(x) of the S.Cs and S.Ts (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 was registered on the file of Ghatkesar Police Station against the second petitioner herein and after completion of investigation, the first respondent filed charge sheet before the XIV Metropolitan Magistrate at L.B.Nagar and the same was taken on file vide P.R.C.No.5 of 2008; that thereafter, Non-Bailable Warrant was issued against the second petitioner and the same is pending for execution; that except trying to execute the Non-Bailable Warrant pending against the second petitioner, the respondent police never interfered with the personal life and liberty of the petitioners at any point of time and that in order to prevent the respondent police from executing the Non-Bailable Warrant, the petitioner filed this writ petition with baseless allegations. In view of the above counter-averments, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly closed. However, the petitioners are at liberty to workout their remedies in the criminal cases, which are pending against them. There shall be no order as to costs. N.V. RAMANA, J Date: 05.10.2010 va