WPMS No. 943 of 2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. Sharad Sharma, the learned senior advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Bhatia, Advocate for the respondent. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Against the issuance of notice on an application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the C.P.C., the plaintiff has preferred the present writ petition. In my opinion, against the issuance of such notice, no writ petition is maintainable under Article 227 of the Constitution. The writ petition is dismissed. It has been stated at the Bar by the learned counsel for the respondent that today is the date fixed for consideration of the injunction application before the trial court. Consequently, in the event, the injunction application is not heard and or decided today by the trial court, the trial court will decide the same within four weeks from the date of the production of a certified copy of the order. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 14.07.2010 Shiv