IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No.11632 of 2011 Date of decision July 7 , 2011 Nachhattar Singh ....... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. K. S. Sandhu, Advocate for the appellant. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. The petitioner's grievance is that obstruction in a public property is not removed in spite of the fact that BDO has brought to the attention of the Sarpanch. Counsel for the petitioner states that there is procedure under Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 under Section 34 which casts an obligation for the authorities to remove public obstruction. The petitioner can have ventilation under the provision of Criminal Procedure Code before the Court. 2. The writ petition is dismissed reserving to the petitioner liberty as granted above. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE July 7, 2011 archana