: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.165 OF 2003 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.165 OF 2003 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.165 OF 2003 Shaikh Abdul Sattar Abdul Azia ).. Appellant Versus Head Master, Bindal Hindi Prathamik ) Vidyalaya and others ).. Respondents Mr.R.S.Apte with Mr.M.V.Limaye for the Appellant. CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR AND CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR AND CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR AND SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DATED: 27TH JANUARY 2005 DATED: 27TH JANUARY 2005 DATED: 27TH JANUARY 2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . This is an Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent of the Bombay High Court. The order impugned is dated 21st February 2002 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court dismissing a Writ Petition filed by the Petitioner. The impugned order gives valid reasons for rejecting the Writ Petition. There is no illegality in the reasons given by the learned Judge. There is no jurisdictional error or any illegality in rejecting the Writ Petition as was done by the learned Judge. 2. The Appellant had filed a Review Petition before the Tribunal seeking payment of back wages. That Review Petition was dismissed by the Tribunal as it lacked : 2 : jurisdiction to entertain Review Petition. A Writ Petition filed against it is dismissed by the impugned order observing that the order of Tribunal is not vitiated warranting any interference by this Court. There is no error in this order either legal, factual or jurisdictional for entertaining a Letters Patent Appeal against it. We see no reason, therefore, to interfere. Appeal dismissed. (V.G. PALSHIKAR, J.) (V.G. PALSHIKAR, J.) (V.G. PALSHIKAR, J.) (SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.)