HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No. 2490 of 2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS l l7. ‘\/ @ Rimjiyus Bek, son of Shri Bika Urao, aged about 35 years, resident of Village Basen, Tehsil Bagicha, Sarpanch Gram Panchayat, Basen, District Jashpur, Chattisgarh (C.G). Vs. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Panchayat 85 Social Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, / Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Addl. Collector, District Chhattisgarh Sub—Divisional Bagicha, Chhattisgarh. Nandeshwar, son of Shri Budhu Chik, aged about 36 years, Thomas, son of Shri about .40 years Smt. Isabela, Wife of Shr'i Habil, aged about 42 years Mikhail Tirkey, son of Shri Kalka, aged about 47 years, Mikhail Toppo, son of Shri Raffel, aged about 48 years, Yujin, son of Shri Prem, aged about 42 years Smt. Dayamani, Wife of Phulsai, aged about 3O years, Smt. Rojaliya, Wife of Shri Phulsai, aged about 47 years Silbanus, son of Shri Shani, aged about 746 years. Sandeep, son of Shri Hijnus, aged about 26 years Leyos, son of Shri Isdoor, aged about 41 years. Smt. Sabestiyana, Wife of Dilphayanus, aged about 37 years Smt. Chintamani, Wife of Shri Dilip, aged about 30 years. Jashpur, (Revenue) Jashpur, Officer District Lohra, aged Shri Resident of Basen, Tehsil Bagieha, Sarpanch Gram Panchayat, Basen,_ District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh Shri M.S. Raghuwanshi, son of not known to the petitioner, aged not known to the petitioner, appointed Presiding Officer 85 Tehsildar, Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur, Chhattisgarh ‘ 2 W.P (C) No. 2490/2009 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Mr. Amrito Das, counsel for the Petitioner. Mr. Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate, for the/respondents 1 to 3. ORAL ORDER (03.02.2010) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J, Heard. a Petitioner Rimjiyus Bek was an elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Basen, Tahsil Bagicha, Distt. Jaspur (C.G). A resolution of no—confidence motion ‘was passed against the petitioner. He challenged the aforesaid action before the Collector. The matter was finally disposed of by the Collector on 26.03.2009. Thereafter, the same has been challenged in this writ petition. Admittedly, the tenure of the petitioner has been elapsed and fresh elections are being conducted. In View of the above, this petition now has become infructuous. Accordingly, W.P (C) No.2490 of 2009 is dismissed, having become infructuous. . (7 Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha i Judge Rao