IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.256 of 2008 JAGTARNI DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.12961 of 2008 NILIMA VERMA Versus L.N.MITHILA UNIVERSITY & ORS with CWJC No.13268 of 2008 DR.SYED ZEYAUR RAHMAN Versus L.N.MITHILA UNIVERSITY & ORS with CWJC No.13435 of 2008 SMT.RAJKUMARI DEVI Versus THE L.N.MITHILA UNIVERSITY &OR with CWJC No.14753 of 2008 BINOD KUMAR SINGH KUSHWAHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.15109 of 2008 ARBIND KUMAR JHA Versus L.N.MITHILA UNIVERSITY & ORS with CWJC No.15164 of 2008 PURNIMA DEVI Versus L.N.MITHILA UNIVERSITY & ORS with CWJC No.15583 of 2008 PROF.RAM EKBAL THAKUR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.15725 of 2008 PROF.BABOO LAL PANDIT Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.16172 of 2008 RAM PRATAP SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with 2 CWJC No.16179 of 2008 RAM SINGARI DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.16191 of 2008 HARINANDAN PRASAD SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.16210 of 2008 RADHE SHYAM PRASAD SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.16307 of 2008 SAVITA RANI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.16628 of 2008 RAM BILASH THAKUR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.17326 of 2008 RAM BRIKSH SHANI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.17354 of 2008 RAM MOHAN GUPTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.17509 of 2008 JELESHWAR MISHRA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.17527 of 2008 DR.NARAYAN JHA Versus L.N.MITHILA UNIVERSITY & ORS with CWJC No.17530 of 2008 ANGOORI FATIMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.17597 of 2008 3 M.Z.HASSAN(NIZAMI) Versus L.N.MITHILA UNIVERSITY & ORS with CWJC No.17868 of 2008 FIRAN JHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.17961 of 2008 MEENA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.1091 of 2009 DR.ABHAY SHANKAR KHAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.1980 of 2009 SMT.SAVITRI DEVI Versus L.N.MITHILA UNIVERSITY & ORS with CWJC No.6944 of 2009 PHULENA PRASAD SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.7280 of 2009 DR.SURENDRA PRASAD THAKUR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02. 26.02.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner, State as also the respondent – University. In all the above writ applications, the primary grievance of the petitioners is that upon their superannuation on different dates, despite request retiral dues have not been settled as yet. Apart from the retiral dues under the different heads, some other grievance has remained to be settled in the respective 4 writ applications. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents – University submits that the claims of the writ petitioners shall be considered as per law, if they file their separate representations stating distinctly unpaid claims, as also the copy of the relevant documents in support of such claim along with the certified copy of the present order. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for expeditious disposal of their claims, petitioners have represented their grievance before the authorities of the University. However, notwithstanding the above, petitioners are ready and proposing to file to file fresh and separate representations before the Registrar of the respondent University enclosing the copy of the relevant documents if any, in support of such claim along with certified copy of the present order within a period of eight weeks from today. In case such representations are filed, the respondent University shall consider each of the claims raised by the petitioners in their representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the pending claims of the petitioners could be 5 settled with statutory interest without further delay. However, upon consideration, if any of the claims or part of the claims are found not admissible, the same shall be communicated to the petitioners with the sufficient reasons thereof. All the above writ applications are disposed of with the above observations/directions for expeditious action. Let copy of the order be handed over to Mr. Partha Sarthy counsel for the University. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)