IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22757 of 2009 1. VIKRAM PASWAN, son of Anirudh Paswan. 2. ANIRUDH PASWAN, son of late Ganga Paswan 3. GANGIYA DEVI, wife of Anirudh Paswan. All are resident of Naya Tola, Sirnian, P.S.-Muffasil Katihar, District- Katihar. …….Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar ……Opposite Party ----------- 02. 01.09.2009 Petitioner No. 1 is the husband, petitioner No. 2 is the father-in-law and petitioner No. 3 is the mother-in-law and they apprehend their arrest in C.A. 908 of 2008 instituted under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is alleged in the First Information Report that after the marriage which took place in the year 2002, the accused persons were tortured the complainant for dowry and have virtually thrown out the complainant and as such the complaint. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a reference to the proceedings as before the Gram Kachahari would show that in-laws of the petitioner No. 1 wanted the petitioner to stay and become Gharjamai and accordingly they refused to let the girl go to her matrimonial house. The Gram Kachahari having failed to mediate in the matter advised the petitioner No. 1 to tackle the matter in the family Court. Petitioner No. 1 has filed a suit for restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu 2 Marriage Act before the Principal Family Judge, Katihar which is pending. Be that as it may, let the petitioner namely 1. Vikram Paswan 2. Anirudha Paswan 3. Gangiya Devi, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on Anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Katihar District-Katihar in connection with C.A. No. 908 of 2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. Shageer (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J)