•^\G«V~ IW THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO.SICS9 OF 2003. PETITIONER -fe 1» ^*^ ^--- RESPONDENTS ^^^-- »*'• ..•-•" J.P.N. Vaidya, S/o Shri Premnarayan Vaidya, Aged about 48 years, Sub //Engineer, Irrigation Department, 1 At Hasdeo Left Bank Canal, Sub DivisionNo. 1, Rampur, Korba, (CHHATTISGARH) VER S U S State of Chhattisgarh, Through; The Secretary, Irrigation Department, D.K.S. Bhawant, Raipur, (CHHATTISGARH) 2. State of Madhya Pradesh, Through ;- The Additional Secretary, Irrigation Department, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (MADHYA PRADESH) Union of India Through; The Director, Departraent of personnel and training public grievances and pension, Room No.312, Lok Nayak Bhawan, 3rd Floor, Khan Market, (State Re- organistion Cell), Khan Market, New Delhi 110003. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTIQJ --— ^^bs:i ifii HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTXSGARH: BILASPUR e Bench: Hon'ble Shrl Satlsli K. Agaihotri, J. W.J>. N&. 3099 OP 2003 Petitioner : J.P.N. Vaidya Versus Respondents : StateofC.G. aild oftiers Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey, counsel for fhe petitioner. ShriAlok Bakshi, Govt. Advocate for State/respondentNo.l. Shri V.C. Ottalwar, counsel for respondent No.2. Slu-i S.K. Beriwal, couasel for respondent No.S/Union of India. ORALOIU3ER (21st February, 2006) 1. The petitioner was eiuiployed as Sub Engineer, ia Irrigation Department, Bhopal, (M.P). By order dated 16.9.2002, the petitioner has been aUocated to State of Chhattisgarh, contraiy to his option. 2. Learned counsel for fhe petitioner submits that fhe petitioner was allocated to the State of Chhattisgarh vide order dated 16.9.2002, the petitioner wants to make a represeritation to fhe respondents/ailthorities for considering his case for re- allocation to the State of Madhya Pradesh, to which leamed counsel for ti.ie respondents have no objection. 3. In view of the foregouig, the petitioner is granted Uberty to inake a representation before fhe cQncerried authorities. The concenied authorities are aecordingly directed to eonsider aad decide fhe representation, if auy, and to pass order iii accordance wifb. law, witlun a period of eight weeks &oia the date of receipt of representation, ./-a -S •liffi 4. In view of fhe foregoing, fhe writ petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. ,———"~-~~^. SatisKK. Agmhotri Judge c^u'