IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 32418 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: December 13, 2010. Pardeep Kumar and others. ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Haryana and another. ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Manoj K.Tanwar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.M.Anand, Addl.A.G., Haryana. Mr. Ram Bhatia, Advocate for respondent No.2 –complainant. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of FIR No.74 dated 23.10.2010 under Sections 147/149/452/294/323/506 IPC and Section 3(1)(1) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, registered at Police Station Satnali District Mohindergarh, Annexure P1, and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise, Annexure P2, having been entered into between the parties. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record. CRM No.M-32418 of 2010 It has been stated by learned counsel for the parties that both the parties are neighbours and dispute between them has since been settled due to intervention of respectable persons of the village and relatives from both the sides. It is further stated that the parties appeared before learned trial Court in compliance of order of this Court dated 02.11.2010. Report has also been received from learned trial Court to the effect that parties entered into the compromise voluntarily. Respondent No.2 – complainant also appeared in person through her counsel and filed reply by way of affidavit admitting the factum of compromise and stating that she is having no objection if the FIR and consequential proceedings are quashed. In appropriate cases FIR can be quashed on the basis of compromise by exercising power under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even if the offences are not compoundable. It was so held by Full Bench of this Court in the case of Kulwinder Singh v. State of Punjab, 2007(3) RCR (Crl.) 1052. Since the parties have amicably settled the matter and compromise has been effected between them due to intervention of the respectable persons and relatives, in the interest of harmonious relations between the parties, who are residents of same village, the present petition is allowed and the impugned FIR No. 74 dated 23.10.2010 under Sections 147/149/452/294/323/506 IPC and Section 3(1)(1) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, registered at Police Station Satnali District Mohindergarh, Annexure P1 alongwith all consequential proceedings qua petitioners –Pardeep Kumar, Mohar Singh, 2 CRM No.M-32418 of 2010 Ajay Singh, Raghubir, Ashu, Rinku @Vikram Singh and Sher Singh is, hereby, quashed. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) December 13, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 3