f" (, .„ , A <" /-1 < ^ ^ O { -.' BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. No. 3>^j^5 Of 2005. PETITIONER PLAINTIFFS "\ -s; \ y^ <^A7/ .^y/y / N W / /L?A^/ ^ ^ h / ^/ y^y ^ ~'\s^^//" -+-...^<«r-^. RESPONDENTS 1. Abdul Aziz, Son ofAbdul Kuddus, aged 42 years, Caste Muslim, 2. Abdul Rasid, son of Abdul Kuddus, aged 33 years, 3. Abdul Latif, son ofAbdul Kuddus, aged 27 years, 4. Mehanumisha, daugher of Ahmed, aged 22 years, All resident of Village Kachhod, P.S. Kelhari, Tahsil Manendragarh, District Korea (Chhattisgarh), .5. Shanfuimisha, daughter of Abdul Kuddus, aged 25 years, 6. Hakikunnisha Parvin, daughter of Abdul Kuddus, aged 22 years, Petitioner no. 5 and 6 resident of Janakpur, Tahsil Bharatpur, District Korea (Chhattisgarh) present resident of Village Kachhod, Tahsil Manendragarh, District Korea (Chhattisgarh). VER S U S 1. Sarguja Jila Sahkari Bhoomi Vikas Bank Maryadit, Through Manager, Ambikapur District Sarguja (Chhattisgarh), / 2. Branch Manager, Sarguja Jila Sahkari Bhoomi Vikas Bank Maryadit, Branch Manendragarh, Tahsil Manendragarh, District Korea (Chliattisgarh), L>' 2 : - 3. Sales Officer, Sarguja Jila Sahkari Bhoomi Vikas Bank Maryadit, Branch Manendragarh, Tahsil Manendragarh, District Korea (Chliattisgarh), 4. Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Korea (Chhattisgarh), DEFENDENTS 5. Nitesh Kumar, son ofNirmal Jain, Co- operative Bank Manager, Branch Kelhari, Manendragarh, District Korea (Chhattisgarh), 6. M.S. Alam, Clerk, Co-operative Bank, Manendragarh, District Korea (Chhattisgarh). PURCHASERS PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 ^TI^T^T f^rN^T^RT $b^i<=b ^rfN" /A.^S ^ 7S[ ^ww^, ^^\w\<oy fadKiy 3TT^Tq^^ ; LO*^- ^r2Jcf<^ / ^ KIHdl sb^<b <wt--»---y-rtwt-JYt^ 2006^ W^ST 5^<yTW ^rf^cT 27.7.2005 Shri H.B. Agai-wal, Sji' cozinsel for the pctitioncT. Heard, The maiii grievaiice of| suit aloug witli aii appMca:^ restrcuiiiag tlie respoudentt dispQsaI of fae siiit, wuich i^ leaiiied Additional District ^ the peudency of that Maiiendragarh had auctiouecp. deceased Aziziinnisha agaiiis oftractor, Counsel for the Additional District Judge, accouiit of tliat Uie applicati4 Rules 1 & 2 read witli. Sectidn for heariug an.d m. thc coiirs' will tlie laiid. He ftiillier submit^ not stayed then the sale given t.o Uie purchaser withc| by tlie petitioner, I fall to zinderstand beiiig dccided. Even if, tlie| District Juclge to assign worl^ for takhig up tlie urgeiit cbi<M^41Ti Hi^^iT^ te^t"<Rt«i< ^3T^T3T1^T r. Cousnel witli Shri Paiikaj Agarival, |fhe petiuouer is fhM he has filed a cwil ^Mca^iQii for graut of teBiporaiy iujuucuon froin aucitiouiag tlie siiit laiid titl ^ pendnig stn.cc 28.4,04 tn the Court 6f ludge, Maiiendragai'h. However, dmliig appllicatiou, 011 '27.6.2005 the Tehsildai', ftie suit l^iid^ which was Biortgaged by the loaii taken by him for tlie purohase peqtlouer submits tliat post of leaiiied 4aiieudragarh is lyiiig vacajit and 011 »u filed by the petition.er under Order 39 151 of tlie CPC is not beiiig taken up of tioie respoudent No.3 lias aticuoucd tliat now if action of tlie respondeiits is be coiifirmed aiid possession wiU be ut decisiou of the said application flled tl(iat why siich urgent appticauon is not court is lying vacaiit it is tiie duty of to some other Additomal District Juclge niatters aiid applicatious, Siiice tlie XI-HC-22 3TI^T^T feri^w^T 5b^i<:b;(rf^cT •u' r> ^ ^ 3^^fPTT?PT, ^^^1$, fa<rtl<iy 311^1 M5|C|» -—..^•.T^^^-M^ ^l^idl *NI* '^""""^'^""Y^ 200^ fc|^ 3n^T^<TT^:^f^r - ^-1 petitioner has clii'ecfly appr^ iujunction application is thereforc, it is appropriate to| ma-ke admmistrative an^mge|] ta.ken up for heai-iiig a.t the the petiUoner hereisi under the CPC aad till the procecdin.gs ofsaJe is staycd, Witli tlie dti'ection Consequentty, M. (W.)P.| staiid disposed of C^ertified copy as pemi| applical|ioii aforelsald :^a.ched this Court ^iid his teniporsity s|till pendiag before tlie coiu-t below^ |direct the District Judgc, Ambikapur to g€|ments so that urgent matte.rs may be e^i'liest aiid also the appUcatiou nioved b;/ C|nier 39 Rule 1 & 2 r/w Section 151 of of the petitioner is decided^ furtlier <t)Nl<yl41Tl HT^ff^ te^t <(^^l< ^3Tf^R'3TI^T tJie petltion staiids disposed of. No.2711/05 aiid I.A. No.6267/05 also es, Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge (^^r)