IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.463 of 2006 RAM KRIPAL SINGH & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ----------- 5. 22.8.2008. This Cr. Revision has been filed for setting aside the order dated 25.4.2006 passed by S.D.J.M., Buxar in G.R. No.929/2004 thereby the petition filed by the petitioners for discharge has been rejected. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as opposite parties. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the informant who is brother of victim lady lodged a false case under Sections 304(B)/201/34 of the I.P.C. against these petitioners, mother-in-law and husband of victim lady. The petitioners are father-in-law and Bhaisur of the victim lady. It is further submitted that later on the victim lady appeared before the Court and got her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. In that very statement she did not allege anything against these petitioners. In spite of that the Court below rejected the petition for discharge. - 2 - On the other hand, learned counsel for opposite parties submitted that there are allegations against these petitioners also and the police has also submitted charge-sheet under Section 498 A I.P.C. Considered the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties as also perused the impugned order. The matter appears to be very serious in nature. The informant lodged the case under Section 304(B),201/34 I.P.C. against these petitioners and others on entirely false allegations. He himself deserves to be suitably prosecuted for lodging a false case. Apart from it, it further appears that the victim lady herself has not alleged anything against these petitioners. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Cr. Revision is allowed. Impugned order 25.4.2006 passed by S.D.J.M., Buxar in G.R. No.929/2004 is hereby aside. These petitioners are discharged from the allegations levelled against them. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.) - 3 -