IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE FRIDAY, THE 5TH DECEMBER 2008 / 14TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 AS.No. 732 of 2000(D) --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 24/01/2000 IN IA. 200/1990 IN OS.4/1984 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,ATTINGAL .................... APPELLANT(S)/3RD DEFENDANT. : -------------- A.SAINULABDEEN, SHOP.NO:879, MAITHANAM, VARKALA VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.SEBASTIAN DAVIS RESPONDENT(S)/PLAINTIFF & DEFENDENTS 1, 2 & 4 TO 17. : ----------------------------- 1. ABDUL RASSAK AMEERJAN, NEDIYAVILA VEEDU, NADAYARA, KANNAMBADESOM, VARKALA VILLAGE. 2.ABDUL RASSAK KHADEEJA BEEVI, CHELLYKUZHI VEEDU, VADAKKEVILA CHERRY, VADEKEVILA VILLAGE., KOLLAM TALUK (DIED). 3. KHADEEJA BEEVI PATHU MUTHU CHELLYKUZHI VEEDU, VADAKKEVILA CHERRY, VADEKEVILA VILLAGE, KOLLAM TALUK. 4. KHADEJA BEEVI NABEES BEEVI, CHELLYKUZHI VEEDU, VADAKKEVILA CHERRY, VADEKEVILA VILLAGE, KOLLAM TALUK. 5. ABDUL RASSAK ABDUL SALAM CHELLYKUZHI VEEDU, VADAKKEVILA CHERRY, VADEKEVILA VILLAGE, KOLLAM TALUK. 6. A..ABDUL RASHEED, CHELLYKUZHI VEEDU, VADAKKEVILA CHERRY, VADEKEVILA VILLAGE, KOLLAM TALUK. 7. SHAHIDA BEEVI, CHELLYKUZHI VEEDU, VADAKKEVILA CHERRY, VADEKEVILA VILLAGE, KOLLAM TALUK. 8. A.ASHRAF, CHELLYKUZHI VEEDU, VADAKKEVILA CHERRY, VADEKEVILA VILLAGE, KOLLAM TALUK. 9. ABDUL RASSAK SHAMSUDEEN, VELYIL PUTHEN VEEDU, KAYALAKKAL CHERRY, ERAVIPURAM VILLAGE, KOLLAM. 10.MUHAMMAD UMMAL VELYIL PUTHEN VEEDU, KAYALAKKAL CHERRY, ERAVIPURAM VILLAGE, KOLLAM. 11.ABDUL RASSAK MAITHEEN KANNU, VELYIL PUTHEN VEEDU, KAYALAKKAL CHERRY, ERAVIPURAM VILLAGE, KOLLAM. 12. ASNARU PILLAI KHADEEJA BEEVI, NEDIYAVILA VEEDU, NADAYARA, KANNAMBA DESOM, VARKALA VILLAGE. 13. KADEEJA BEEVI SUBAIDA BEEVI. NEDIYAVILA VEEDU, NADAYARA, KANNAMBA DESOM, VARKALA VILLAGE. 14. ABDUL RASSAK MUHAMMAD ASHRAF, NEDIYAVILA VEEDU, NADAYARA, KANNAMBA DESOM, VARKALA VILLAGE. 15. KHADEEJA BEEVI HAYARUNEESA, NEDIYAVILA VEEDU, NADAYARA, KANNAMBA DESOM, VARKALA VILLAGE. 16. KESAVAN JAYAPRAKASH, KERALA KAUMUDI AGENT KERALA KAUMUDI OFFICE, VARKALA. 17.. SAINUDEEN, ADHARAMEZHUTHU, MAIDANAM, VARKALA. ADV. SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH FOR R1 THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 5 / 12 /2008 , THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE,J. ------------------------ A.S.No. 732 OF 2000 ------------------------ Dated this the 5th day of December, 2008 JUDGMENT After hearing Sri. Sebastian Devis, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri. G.S.Reghunath, learned counsel for the respondents in detail, I suggested to both the counsel to explore the possibility of having the impugned decree modified on consensus by exchanging the property described in Ext.C1(a) plan (GHNMLO) for the property described in Ext.C1(b) plan (PNQRP) for allotment to the first respondent. It was also suggested to the learned counsel to find out from the parties as to whether the appellant will be prepared to pay a further amount of Rs.15,000/- to the first respondent and whether the first respondent will be prepared to receive the said amount in full and final settlement of his claims in addition to the property in PNQRP in Ext.C1(b) plan. 2. Today, it is reported to me that on persuasion by the learned counsel the parties have become agreeable to the suggestions put to by them. Accordingly, I am of the view that the impugned final decree can be modified to the following A.S..No.732/2000 2 extent and in substitution of the same the following decree can be passed. It is accordingly ordered as follows:- i). The first respondent plaintiff will be allotted towards his share in the decree schedule properties, the property described as plot PNQRP in Ext.C1(b) plan and the building portions situated thereon. ii). The stair case leading to the upstairs of the two storied building, a portion of which is alloted to the share of the first respondent (shown as QMLOQ,) will be kept in common for the appellant and the first respondent. Iii). The appellant will pay a sum of Rs.15,000/- despite the impugned decree declining mesne profits to the first respondent within two months from today, failing which the above amount together with interest at the rate of 12% p.a. will be recoverable by the first A.S..No.732/2000 3 respondent charged on the properties which are being allotted to the appellant under this decree. The plan Ext.C-1(b) will form part of this decree. (PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE) dpk A.S..No.732/2000 4 PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE,J. ------------------------ A.S.No. 732 OF 2000 ------------------------ JUDGMENT 5TH DECEMBER 2008