IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revision No. 1015 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: September 06, 2011 Teja Singh .. Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Hitesh Sood, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N. Jindal, J The complainant has assailed the judgment dated 16.7.2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, dismissing the appeal of the respondents against the judgment dated 17.11.2009 convicting them under Section 452/323 read with Section 149 IPC, with the modification in sentence by releasing them on probation under Section 4(1) of the Probation of Offenders Act. The State has not preferred any revision but only the complainant has challenged the same. The case was registered on 14.8.2003 implicating nine persons, out of them, Gulzar Singh son of Chanan Singh and Gulzar Singh son of Bhagat Singh were 75 years of age at that time and they might be 85 years old by now. Similarly, Kehar Singh respondent was 70 years old at the time of occurrence and he must be 80 years old by now, who has been acquitted by the trial court, whereas, Bhinder Singh had expired during the trial. The injuries attributed to the respondents are simple in nature. They have suffered agony of trial for the last nine years, therefore, under these circumstances, the judicial discretion exercised by the Appellate Court sounds to the reason. Even otherwise, this revision petition is delayed by 72 days. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. September 06, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge