sanjay 1 846.11-caw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 846 OF 2011 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 31402 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 539 OF 2005 City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd., Navi Mumbai. ... Applicant. V/s. M/s.Makhija Developers Pvt.Ltd. and others. ... Respondents. G.S.Hegde for the applicant. Avinash Fatangare for respondent No.1. S.D.Rayrikar, A.G.P. for respondent No.2. Ms.Deepti Mestry i/b. M/s.Divyakant Mehta & Associates for respondent No.4. CORAM : B. H. MARLAPALLE & R.Y.Ganoo, JJ. DATED : 4th May 2011. P.C. : Heard Mr.Hegde, learned counsel appearing for the applicant as well as learned counsel appearing for the respondents. sanjay 2 846.11-caw 2. This is an application for condonation of delay in filing Review Petition (St.) No.31402/2010. As per the office note, the review petition is filed beyond time by 293 days. 3. We have noted that S.L.P.(Civil) No.16530/2010 was disposed of by the Supreme Court on 7th July 2010 as withdrawn and with liberty to approach this Court for expunging of the remarks made in our judgment dated 20th January 2010. The review petition was filed around 9th December 2010. In the application, there is no explanation furnished whatsoever to support the prayer to condone the delay except to say that in the meanwhile there was Diwali Vacation and further delay was attributable to the learned advocate. Though we are not impressed by these grounds in support of the prayer for condonation of delay, the applicant being a public sector undertaking and we being aware of administrative delays, we deem it appropriate to condone the delay caused in filing the review petition. 4. Hence the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)