IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND JULY 2008 / 11TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 19839 of 2008(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- K.M.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR AGED 52, S/O.GOVINDAN NAIR KRISHNA NIVAS, EKAROOL, BALUSSERY. BY ADV. SRI.P.GOPALAKRISHNA MENON SRI.M.JITHESH MENON RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSSPORT AUTHORITY VADAKARA. 2. M.K.NAFEESA, W/O. K.K.KOYA MUNDOTTOM KANDY HOUSE P.O.KINALOOR, BALUSSERY, KOZHIKODE. BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 19839 OF 2008 J ==================== Dated this the 2nd day of July, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that the 2nd respondent had complained that the petitioner is operating on routes outside the permit. On this basis, the 2nd respondent has filed an application before the 1st respondent and sought revision of the petitioner's timing as well. Thereafter she approached this court and secured Ext.P3 judgment directing the 1st respondent to consider the objections. 2. The petitioner submits that the objection raised and the request for revision of timings sought for by the 2nd respondent are totally untenable and raising this plea, petitioner has filed Ext.P4. In this writ petition what is sought for by the petitioner is a direction to the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P4 and pass orders thereon. 3. On the above facts, I do not think there is any reason to decline the limited relief that is sought for by the petitioner. 4. Therefore, taking into account the above facts submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of directing that if Ext.P4 has been received, the 1st respondent shall take up WPC 19839/08 :2 : and consider Ext.P4 also along with the application filed by the 2nd respondent which is directed to be considered in Ext.P3 judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp