WPSS No. 610 of 2011 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate present for the petitioners. Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand has accepted notices on behalf of respondent no. 1. Ms. Geeta Parihar, Advocate has accepted notice on behalf of respondent no.2. Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sudhir Singh, Advocate has accepted notice on behalf of respondent no.3. The matter relates to Teachers Eligibility Test (from hereinafter referred to as TET). The eligibility of petitioners to appear in the examination is in question. In a bunch of such writ petitions this Court vide interim order dated 27.5.2011 in Writ Petition No. 445 (S/S) of 2011 and in other connected writ petitions directed the respondents to allow the petitioners to appear in the said examination. The terms and conditions stated in the said interim order dated 27.5.2011 shall also be applicable in the present case. In short, the respondents are directed to accept the application form of the petitioners and also allow them to appear in the subsequent examination of TET. It is clarified that this interim order is being given to the petitioners subject to the condition that they are otherwise eligible to appear in the examination. It is made clear that this liberty or relief granted to the petitioners is only provisional in nature, and will depend upon the final outcome of the petition. This order is subject to the fact that the petitioners have duly submitted their forms in time. Learned Standing Counsel seeks three weeks’ time to file counter affidavit. Time is granted. Rejoinder affidavit be filed within two weeks thereafter. List this matter after six weeks. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 21.6.2011 Kuldeep