t^ ^^Mf^ K ^^R|^i.£ ' ^ ?;; 'f% IN THE HON?BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR r.P. C. N0. ^ &35y OF 2011 PETITIONER ^ Vinay Swarnkar son of Shri Sadhuram, aged about-58 years R/o village- Sariya, Tahsil- Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RBSPONDENTS 1: ^" ^" State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary Nagriya Prashan Awam Vikas Bibhag, ^'^ /' ^ ^' /^. __":_. .\Yy/ D.K.S. Bhavan,Raipur (C.G.) ,A:!<%-""2. ^ <?^y2''Nayab Nayab Tahsildar, Sariya Tahsil- Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 3. Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Sariya., Distt. Raigarh CG i ?1 PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF • THE @ HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION (C) N0.6997 OF2011 Vijay Swarnkar Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri M.K. Sinha, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Adv. General with Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents and respondenV Nagar Panchayat - Saria. ORDER (Passed on this 15th day of December, 2011) 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for fhe State/respondents submits that the respondent authorities have decided to withdraw the impugned notice dated 18-11-2011 (Annexure - P/1), as no sufficient time was given, and if necessary frgsh notice shall be issued affording proper opportunity of hearing to the respective person to put forward their case, if any. 2. In view of the above, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. .:A^Agnibotri s^v Gowri