IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 15207 of 2010 Date of decision: 28.06.2010 Pawan Kumar ........ Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. J S Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner Ms Preeti Choudhari, AAG, Haryana for the respondent - State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) It is not disputed that neither the name of the petitioner was mentioned in the FIR, nor any injury had been attributed to him. It is also not disputed that the case of the petitioner is similarly situated with that of co-accused Padam Singh, who has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide CRM No. M 4822 of 2010. It is also not disputed that the petitioner has since joined the investigation. Accordingly, the order dated 27.05.2010 passed by this Court is made absolute. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 28.06.2010 mohan