l ('5 ’57’ L'mgag @gmh IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILAspUR W343; Nagwgr‘ 2008 PETITIONER Satyanarayan Shanna. S/ o Late Shri B.P. Shanna, Aged about 47 years, Postsd. as Patwari, P.H.N0.52, (earlier P. H. No. 1 1 5) Village Dumartarai, Tahsil and District Raipur (CG) R/o Near Jyoti School, Behind ' Kn‘shna STD, Kailashpuri, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS w”s+aue of wWsgMk‘Wmrmv'A Secretary, Department of Revenue and Calamities Management, DKS Bhawan, ’Mantralaya, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG) Collector, Oilice of Collector, (Land Records mgmauwa do mw r Branch), Raipur Pistrict Ralpur (CG) V Shri ’I‘aniKanungo, Fatwari, P.H.No.115, Tahsil and District Raipur (CG)) Shn’ Neelkant Verma, Patwari, P.H.No.84, Dharsinwa, District Raipur (CG) WW PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION , OF INDIA .@ » kl e respondent No.4 was posted as Patwari of P.H.No.52, W1 ”h is the Changed P.H.No. after reconstitution of P.H.No. 1 15. Learned counSel for t1 petitioner as, also the respondentS submit that confusion in the matters of posting of the petitioner and the respondent No. 4 arose because of reconstitution of P.H.No.115 after posting of the petitioner as Patwari of that Halka. They further submit that this petition may be disposed of by directing the State to pass appropriate orders afresh in the ‘mattars; of posting 0f the p6 titionar .alld the r€spondentrN04 in view of reconstitution of RHNO. 1 15, after passing of the order of Annexure P/ 3. u-r 1 writ ?etiiian unu‘er Aftic1¢¥ 2.26 of t1he Constiiutian of India B: EIGN. SHRI DHIRE 21-1%‘2€3&8 Smt. Fouzia Mirza, CO 1se1 for the p6titioner. Shli MPS Bhatia, Dy Shri Vinod Deshmukh, (301111361 for respondelitS No. 3 65 4. Grievance 0f the petitio 1e1‘ in the instant petition is that the to 01d RENO. 115 Dumartarai, Taheil and dated 13.5.2068 (Annexure P/‘3j. } owever, thereafter, Vide order dated 30.6.2008 (Annexure P/4) E3HRA J M ‘ for the State. G istrict Raipur vide order petitionet‘ wae transfelTed as Patwari S ND 1 m mC/QPC3.) g ..L V‘ $1200 6 77 41" mmm ammm mm (Wu) m ma amt z mfa‘ahm fez?m 1 as aim am WWWW WWW>399L 111200 Cb v w mm(a§ha§u) I é I WWW WW wm 3 $afmm v 1 111 Viaw of abowe sukmissiOns 0f learned coumsel for the parties, the instant petition is dispo‘ State tok paSs freSh order regarding l1petitioner’s posting in View of sed OL with a direction to the 1‘" the reconstitution of P.}'.No.1152 This exercise should be completed expeditionsly, not late Lnan four weeks from today. In the meanwhile, status—(1110 with respect to posting of the petitioner and respondent No.4 shall be maintg‘grgd’.’ ,L1 's 5d/--_ r a l} 'h’hirendra Mishrag i a ‘ , Judge