8 ?•* ^?'-'EW! S U^^^>;C >Jifc-^^! •'n ' f.,\0'i (2) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0; /2006 PETITIOMER ^y>^ ^>SF^^ .-'"^.^'^^' l^-^^-' se"a sif i^ ..••" y°" Y..-- .^•"" RESPONDENTS ^ Umashankar Salam Age about 40 years, AssistantTeacher, S/o Shri B. Salam Bardebhatha, Kanker, Tahsil - Kanker, Distt. - Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS State Government of Chhattisgarh Thrpugh:- Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer Kanker(C.G.) Block Education Officer Kanker(C.G.) Joint Director (Treasury/Accounts) Jagdalpur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA f ,. JUDIC, 'tri. J. P. (S) No.7376 of 200j Petitioner Responaents •I. Umashankar Saiam Versus State of C ' and ihri Sornkant Verma, counsel for ths petitioner. Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lav/ysr for the State/Respondents -^?a>^ -ti.; inuarv, 2007's Learnsd counsei appearing for the petitioner as weli as for the State/respondents jointSy submit that the facts of the present writ petiiion are simllar to that of in W.P. (S) No.5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and othsrs Vs. State Govt. or ChhattJsgarh & Others), v/hich was aliowed vide order datsd 07.11.2006. They further submit that ths question of !aw Involved is aiso the same. 2. !n view of the above stated su'omissions made by learned counse! for the parties, the writ pstition Is aiiowed in terms of the order datsd 07.11.2006 passed by this Court in W.P.(S). No.5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & Others). No order as to costs. Sd/- Satlsh KAgnihotri Judge