IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 1401 of 2010 Smt. Pritam Kaur .....Petitioner VERSUS Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Sanjay Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohnish Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate for the respondents. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. Costs not deposited. Counsel for the respondents undertakes to deposit the costs within one week. Counsel would show the receipt to the Registry after deposit of the costs. Otherwise also, the counsel for the respondents has placed on record an order passed by the Chief Engineer allowing family pension to the petitioner. The order is kept on record. The apprehension of the petitioner that some amount would be recovered from the family pension is not borne out from the order. In case, there is any order directing recovery, the petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the same. Even otherwise, it will be open to doubt if the recovery due from the deceased employee can be made from family pension. The writ petition, therefore, is rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. March 17, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE