IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 7418 of 2008. Decided on: 06.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Chander Sheikhar. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondent No.1. Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): According to the reply filed by the respondents, the remedy of appeal has not been availed by the petitioner. Consequently, the petitioner is permitted to file an appeal before respondent No.2, i.e., the Managing Director of respondent-Corporation for the redressal of his grievance, within a period of three weeks from today. Thereafter the Managing Director of the respondent-Corporation shall decide the same in accordance with law after hearing the petitioner. Limitation shall not come in the way of the petitioner in view of Section 14 of the Limitation Act since he had been diligently pursuing the remedy before this Court. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - 2. Accordingly, in view of the observations made hereinabove, the petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 06, 2010. (sck).