-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.44 OF 2007 REVISION APPLICATION NO.44 OF 2007 REVISION APPLICATION NO.44 OF 2007 AND AND AND CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL REVISION REVISION REVISION APPLICTION NO.45 OF 2007 APPLICTION NO.45 OF 2007 APPLICTION NO.45 OF 2007 ............................................................. ............................................................. ............................................................. Office Notes,Office Office Notes,Office Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, memorandum of Coram, memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s appearances,Court’s appearances,Court’s Court’s Court’s Court’s or or or orders or directions orders or directions orders or directions Judge’s Judge’s Judge’s orders orders orders & Registrar’s orders. & Registrar’s orders. & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. ............................................................. ............................................................. Mr.Dinesh Shah for the Petitioner Ms Geeta Jogalekar for Respondent. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : MARCH 23,2007. : MARCH 23,2007. : MARCH 23,2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. As a Revision Application for challenging the order dated 10th January 2007 is not mainatainable, the learned Advocate for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Civil Revision Applications with liberty to file appropriate proceedings for challenging the impugned order. 2. Civil Revision Applications are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. 3. All contentions on merits are expressly kept open. 4. Parties to act upon an authenticated copy of this order. -2- JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE