IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 3254 of 2008 Between: Mahfooz Bin Essa AI-Affari, S/o.Late Essa Bin Mohammed Al-Affari R/o.H.No.205-165, Qazipura, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND The Sub-Registrar, Rajendernagar, R.R.Dist. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the respondents in not taking any steps on the representation submitted by the petitioner dt.14-5-2007 as arbitrary, unjust, illegal and conseuently direct the respondent herein lto incorporate the name of the petitioner and delete the name of the Vendor of the petitioner in the records by duly giving effect to the Sae Deeds bearing Doc.Nos. 10660/2006 and 10661 dt.31-7-2006, and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit land proper in the circumstances of the case Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.LAYEEQ KHAN Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 3254 of 2008 Order: The petitioner states that he is the absolute owner and possessor of House bearing Municipal Nos.8-4-62, 8-4-63 and 8-4-64 (Old House Nos.7-7/2 and 7-7/3), admeasuring 1345 Sq. Yards, situated at Mailardevpally village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, having purchased the same from its lawful owner Abood Bin Salam, by virtue of two different registered sale deeds dated 31.07.2006 for a valid sale consideration. The petitioner further states that when his vendor, namely Abood Bin Salam, with a mala fide intention and without giving any notice, has unilaterally cancelled the said sale deeds executed in his favour, he filed a suit in O.S. No. 354 of 2007 on the file of the II Additional District judge, Ranga Reddy District, and in view of the compromise entered into between him and his vendor Abood Bin Salam, the matter was referred to the Lok Adalat, and the Lok Adalat, by award dated 30.04.2007, declared him as absolute owner and possessor of the subject property. Now the grievance of the petitioner is that subsequent to passing of said award, he made a representation dated 14.05.2007 requesting the respondent to incorporate his name in the Encumbrance Certificate and delete the name of his Vendor from the concerned records in respect of the subject property, but no orders thereon have been passed till date. Hence, he filed the present writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue. Both the counsel agreed for disposal of the writ petition with a direction to the respondent to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 14.05.2007. Since the representation of the petitioner, dated 14.05.2007, is said to be pending consideration before the respondent, and in view of the agreed stand taken by both the counsel, without going into the merits of the matter, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with the following directions: The respondent, namely the Sub-Registrar, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District, is directed to consider the representation, dated 14.05.2007, of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, expeditiously. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 28.02.2008 Nsr ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{MJ}