IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29922 of 2002 RAM BALAK RAI & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 7/ 19.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The order of summoning dated 20.6.2002 in Complaint Case No. 51 of 2002 is being assailed in the present petition. There is no mention of the year or the period since when the complainant lady was married to petitioner no. 1 Ram Balak Rai. The allegation is that she was living peacefully for quite some time and thereafter she was being tortured as she was not bringing money from her parents who were quite rich persons. The lady alleged being assaulted and ill treated in various ways and, thereafter, being expelled from the matrimonial house after being deprived of meals etc. The two witnesses who were examined in course of enquiry included the mother of the lady and she also was not specific as to when the lady was married to the petitioner. Witness no. 2 who is a co villager, i.e., Rajnath Rai, stated that there was a property dispute between the lady and the present set of accused persons. In the light of the above, the prosecution launched against the petitioners through the present complaint is bad in law and the same quashed. The petition succeeds. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)