CRM No.M-28945 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM No. M-28945 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision: 12.1.2009 G.S. Seth ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Gautam Dutt, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG, Punjab. Rajan Gupta, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the order dated November 06, 2008, passed by this court, the petitioner has appeared before the trial court and he has been admitted to bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.40,000/- with one surety of the like amount and an undertaking to appear before the court on each and every dates of hearing. The counsel further prays that in view of the fact that he has already appeared before the trial court, the order dated November 06, 2008 be made absolute. He further submits that all the offences alleged in the complaint are otherwise bailable. The counsel submits that the petitioner was transferred to Bombay, he was not able to appear before the trial court pursuant to the process issued against him. It is due to this reason that ultimately non- bailable warrants were issued against him. It is not disputed by the counsel for the State that the petitioner has appeared before the trial CRM No.M-28945 of 2008 2 court and furnished bail bonds. Since the petitioner has already furnished bail bonds before the trial court, no further orders are required to be passed by this court. Disposed of as such. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE January 12, 2009 'rajpal'