C. R. No. 558 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : C. R. No. 558 of 2010 Date of Decision : July 26, 2010 Rattan Lal Gupta and others .... Petitioners Vs. Rakesh Kumar and another .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate for respondent no. 2. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Plaintiffs have filed the instant revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India having remained unsuccessful in both the courts below in securing temporary injunction. Notice of motion in the instant revision petition was issued to respondent no.2 only to the limited extent of considering the question of temporary injunction against alienation of suit property during pendency of the suit. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the C. R. No. 558 of 2010 2 case file. I need not go into the merits of the case. The only apprehension of the petitioners is that if respondent no.2 alienates the suit property during pendency of the suit, it would create complication and the alienee may plead to be bona fide purchaser of the suit property. This apprehension of the plaintiffs/petitioners can be redressed by directing respondent no.2 to inform the alienee by recital in the alienation deed about the pendency of the suit, so that the alienee may not take the plea of being bona fide purchaser. The said direction will not cause any loss or injury to respondent no.2, who shall be at liberty to alienate the suit property during pendency of the suit, with prejudice to the rights of the parties in the suit. However, such a direction would protect the rights of the petitioners in case they succeed in the suit. Accordingly, it is directed that if respondent no.2 alienates the suit property during pendency of the suit, respondent no.2 shall inform the alienee by specific recital in the alienation deed itself about the pendency of the suit and shall also produce a copy of the alienation deed in the trial court within one month of the execution of the alienation deed. The revision petition stands disposed of accordingly. However, nothing in this order shall effect the merits of the suit. July 26, 2010 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE