Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified V $-2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 901/2004 KULDIP GANDOTRA Plaintiff Through: Ms. Shraddha Bhargava, Adv. versus SHAILENDRANATH Defendant Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMIWAZIRI ORDER % 27.02.2015 LA. 3131/2015 in CSrOS) 901/2004 The suit was decreed with costs on 04.07.2006. The learned counsel for the applicant/plaintiff submits that although a copy of the said decree was applied for many times, but was delivered to the plaintiff only after a period of 9 years on 30.01.2015. It was then discovered that erroneously in the decree the onus of costs has been imposed upon the plaintiff instead of the defendant, as held in the judgment. This evidently is an error which should be rectified. Let the decree be rectified to the extent that the costs shall be payable by the defendant. The application is allowed in the above terms. FEBRUARY 27, 2015/acm NAJMI WAZIRI, J