IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1470 of 2006 ASHOK KUMAR SHARAN Versus SHAILENDRA KUMAR SHARAN & ANR ----------- 2 27.11.2008 No one appears for the petitioner. Counsel for the opposite parties is present. The order dated 29.8.2005 between the parties having been allowed to become final, the same could not have been sought to be indirectly assailed by filing a fresh application for the same relief on 24.10.2005. Such prayer of the petitioner made in the application dated 21.6.2001 and rejected on 29.8.2005 at least could not have been reopened by way of filing of a fresh application. The remedy for the petitioner was to file a review application but that was never done and in fact an application for recall of the order was wholly misconceived. Rejection of such prayer by the impugned order would definitely not anount to any jurisdictional error. Accordingly, this Civil Revision application being misconceived is hereby dismissed. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)