IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.13479 of 2011 Date of Decision: July 29, 2011 Darshana Devi ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Surinder Singh Duhan, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. During the pendency of enquiry proceedings against the petitioner, the petitioner was recommended for SAS Training in Accounts Training Institute Haryana at Panchkula. Second part relates to permission to the petitioner to appear in the examination which is fixed for 30.7.2011. The grievance of the petitioner is that her name has not been recommended and so she has not been issued the roll number. As per the counsel, if the finding in the enquiry is in favour of the petitioner, she will lose one precious year, which will lead to wastage of lot of money as well. The Enquiry Officer may have submitted his report, but the enquiry is yet to be finalised. That perhaps appears to be a reason for which the petitioner is not being granted permission. I do not see any unfairness which would call for interference. Dismissed. July 29, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE