IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3957 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3957 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3957 OF 2007 Harmeet Singh Sodhi .... Applicant versus Tarvindersingh Kulbirsingh Lamba...... Respondent. Shri Harshad E. Palwe for the applicant Shri Y.M.Nakhwa APP for State. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 15TH FEBRUARY, 2008 DATED; 15TH FEBRUARY, 2008 DATED; 15TH FEBRUARY, 2008 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. The applicant is questioning the correctness of the order passed by the Magistrate so also the Sessions Judge in revision, holding that the Court at Nashik has territorial jurisdiction to try the complaint filed by the respondent under section 138 of N.I.Act. Perusal of the order passed by the revisional court and to be more precise, paragraph 11 thereof clearly indicate that the transaction between the parties had taken place at Nashik where the complainant resides and works for gain. If this be the position it is obvious that part of cause of action has arisen at Nashik. I do not propose to go into the correctness of the complaint on facts. Hence declining to interfere with the impugned order, criminal application stands rejected. It is made clear that no other contentions touching the merit of the matter has been considered and all questions barring issue of territorial jurisdiction are left open to be agitated before the trial court. ...