cal/ A 450' C‘ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, WRIT PETITION NO.3‘$ 8S OF 2004 PETITIONER: Hori Ram Dewangan, S/O Late Shri Sam Rath Dewangan, Aged about 54 years, Accounts Officer, Head Office of Chhattisgarh State Marketing Federation, Raipur (CG). Awadesh Kumar Singh, S/O Late Shri R.D. Singh, Aged about 54 years, District Marketing Officer, Chhattisgarh State Marketing Federation, District Branch, Raipur (C.G.). Narendra Kumar Sharma, S/O Shri Janaklal Sharma, Aged about 50 years, Manager, Kisan Rice Mill, "Palari, District Raipur (co). Suresh Rao Kadam, S/O Shri Laxrnan Rao Kadam, Aged about 49 years, District Marketing Officer, Janjgir, District Janjgir v Champa (C.G.). Nawal Kishore Agrawal, S/O Late Shri Lalji Agrawal, Aged abcut 54 years, District Marketing Officerskmbi “basic- G‘)‘ Bodhiran} Singhsarvey, S/O Late Shri Vishrarn Singhsarvey, Aged , about 58 years, Assistant Accounts Officer, District Marketing Office, Raipur (C.G.). CHHATTISGARH 10. Daulat Ram Choudhary, S/O Shli Tikamlal Choudhary, Aged about 54 years, Sr. Assistant, P.F. Branch, Head Office of CG. State Marketing Federation, Raipur (C.G.). Dileram Kashyap, S/O Mohanlal Kashyap, Aged about 53 years, Manager, Kisan Rice Mill, Pamgarh. Mahendra Singh Thakur, S/O. Shri Raghunandan Singh Thakur, Aged about 54 years, Manager, Kisan Rice Mill, Durg (C.G.). Mudrika Prasad Gautam, S/O Shri Ramdulare Gautam, Aged about 58 years, Manager, Kisan Rice Mill, Baramkela, District Raigarh (co). Mani Shankar Pandey, S/O Shri Basant Lal Ji Pandey, Aged about 58 years, District Marketing Officer, Raigarh (C.G.). Jiwanlal Sahu, S/O Shri Gautamlal Sahu, Aged about 55 years, District Marketing Officer, Kawardha (C.G.). ML. Pandey, S/O Shri H.P. Pandey, Aged about 61 years, Retd. District Marketing Officer, Accounts Officer, C.G. State C0— operative Marketing Federation Ltd., R/O Arvindnagar, Indira Vihar, Sarkanda, Bilaspur (C.G.). Ganesh Prasad Soni, S/O Late Shri Chheddu Lal Soni, Aged about 61 years, R/O Mahoba Bazar, Hirapur Road, Sarvoday Colony, Tatibandh, Raipur (C.G.). ll. l2. 15. Sukh Sagar Singh Thakur, S/O Late Shri Kundal Singh Thakur, Retired Manager, Kisan Rice M11, Bandha Bazar, Rajnandgaon, presently residing at Village Kewtara, P.O. Saja, District Durg (C.G.). Versus RESPONDENTS: Chhattisgarh State Co—operative Marketing Federation Ltd., Through : its Secretary, 880, Civil Lines, Head Quarter, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Co-operative Marketing Federation Ltd, Raipur (C.G.). 3. Accountant General, Madhya Pradesh, Gwalior (MR). 4. Accountant General, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.). WRITN PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 3a We}; ’Wl‘é,’W ‘gm§mq ”3g NM. m/mg; 2w We??? Ema“ {awyywm a i M J 04 01 2005 ‘ Shn‘ B.D. Guru, cmmsel for th€ stitioner. fa‘f‘gQ? WQ'R w n», NM) yq§$ v i w § $w€aii ‘ .a "Q; \ 31?“?! M m, HM‘KWVAMF‘WG}; n . as"; .ai’ei; € $31M Shri Dashrath Gupta, Govt. Ad ocate for the State on advance copy. $ I.A.No.6862 of 2004 for urgentihearing is allowed. Heard. These petitioners were also the petitioners in W.P.No.2710/2003 and W.P.No.2773/03. These two petitions were disposed of by a common order dated 13.2.2004 passed by this Court. The earlier petitions were preferred by the petitioners under Article 226/227 (if the Constitution of India challeng‘ng the legality, validity and propriety of the orders of recoveries issued against them whereby the respondents had ordered for recovering the amounts Q running into lakhs of rupees nom each of the petitioner because of the audit objection of the Accountant General, Gwalior. .I‘t was contended that the recovery was being made on the gound that during the posting of the petitioners in particular Kisan rice Mill in between years 1995-96, 1996-97 l r the shortage in quantity of Paddy was more than permissible limits. This Court vide order dated 13.2.2004 passed in the aforesaid two petitions directed that a detailed representations will be hled by the petitioners before the concerned authority and on silich representations being tiled, the concerned authority will consider all t e points raised bv the petitioners and GL DRJ—v—FS/350—1 2/2000e50,000. ‘ ' ~. l"\\ p - ‘ a ¥ 3'7 :axur"; \“Tr’q: gafnm w a} 423%? mjk§$f7w é Q?! ifEYWIR an x. 1' H m gm: m’w aim N 3'62? ”mil? 1x765? Efi§3 w wmm/2mg 97% 2w 6%??1 WW i%a;m:!¥ § L 2 i\"