IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3288 of 2009 RAJESH KUMAR RANJAN son of Sri Awadhesh Kumar Singh @ Nageshwar Singh, resident of village J. Kurua Kaurtiya, PS Ghosi, District Jehanabad----petitioner . Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The State Election Commissioner, Bihar Patna 3. The District Magistrate cum District Election Officer, Jehanabad 4. The Sub-divisional Officer, Jehanabad 5. The Block Development Officer, Madanganj cum returning officer, PO Madanganj, PS Ghosi district Jehanabad 6. Shyam Nandan Sharma, son of late Kamala Prasad Singh, resident of village Okari, PS Ghosi, District Jehanabad 7. Devendra Sharma son of Sri Kamta Singh, resident of village Shekhpura PS Ghosi, District Jehanabad 8. Dinkar Kumar Sharma, son of Awadhesh Singh, resident of village Okari, PS Ghosi, District Jehanabad 9. Anand Priyadarshi, son of Radhey Shyam Sharma, resident of village Okari PS Ghosi, District Jehanabad 10. Bina Devi, wife of Shyam Nandan Sharma, resident of village Okari PS Ghosi, District Jehanabad 11. Madan Prasad Singh, son of Late Jai Shankar Singh @ Jwala Shankar Prasad Singh, resident of village Okari, PS Ghosi, District Jehanabad 12. Binod Kumar, son of Sidheshwar Singh, resident of village Shekhpura PS Ghosi, District Jehanabad 13. Purshotam Kumar son of Yogendra Singh, resident of village Dhobri, PS Ghosi, District Jehanabad -------------------respondents ----------- 2 07-11-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The present application has been filed for a minor modification in the judgement and order dated 7-10-2009 passed in L.P.A. no. 681/2008 whereby the L.P.A. was dismissed. The respondent no.6 in that appeal is petitioner and he has prayed that it may be further ordered by way of addition that the judgement and order shall be communicated to the Election Tribunal, that is, Civil Judge, Junior Division, Jehanabad who tried Election Case no. 31/2006. In our view this would be starting a new practice because it is the duty of registry and the office to communicate 2 final judgements and orders in writ cases to the concerned authorities. An application made by any of the concerned parties can only serve the purpose of expediting this duty on the office. Hence, we do not find any necessity of modifying our judgement and order dated 7-10-2009. This application is, therefore, dismissed. It goes without saying that if an application is filed by the petitioner, who was one of the respondents in the L.P.A., then on payment of necessary cost etc. either a copy will be communicated to the concerned court as per practice and procedure of this court and further as an alternative, it is observed that in case the court concerned does not act on the basis of certified copy of our judgement and order then for disregard of judgement and order of this court the petitioner will be at liberty to initiate appropriate proceeding. BKS/- (Shiva Kirti Singh, ACJ.) (Jyoti Saran, J.)