THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI Civil Revision Petition No. 4724 of 2010 Dated: 08.11.2010 Between: Grandhi Lakshmi Narayana, West Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND Grandhi Vyjayanthi, Pondicherry state. .....RESPONDENT THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI Civil Revision Petition No. 4724 of 2010 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 18.08.2010 in I.A.No.1066 of 2007 in O.P.No.18 of 2006 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Tanuku. O.P.No.18 of 2006 was filed by the Revision Petitioner under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for restitution of conjugal rights. The respondent herein filed O.P.No.158 of 2006 under Section 13 (1) (i) (a) & (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for divorce. Both the O.Ps. were clubbed and were being tried together. Pending the said petitions, the respondents herein filed I.A.No.1066 of 2007 under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for grant of maintenance at the rate of Rs.3,000/- per month to her and another Rs.3,000/- per month to her son, apart from Rs.15,000/- per months towards litigation expenses. The Revision petitioner filed a counter opposing the said petition. However as he was not present on the date of hearing nor was represented by his counsel, on a perusal of the counter-affidavit the Court below by order dated 18.08.2010 allowed I.A.No.1066 of 2007 directing payment of Rs.5,000/- towards litigation expenses and granting interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.3,000/- per month to the respondent herein and Rs.2,000/- per month to her son. Aggrieved by the said order, the present Revision Petition has been filed. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material available on record. It is apparent from the order under Revision that the counsel for the Revision petitioner was not heard before passing the said order. In the circumstances, the proper course would be to file an application before the Court below to recall the said order explaining the reasons for his absence on the date of hearing. Hence I am not inclined to go into the merits of the case at this stage. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the various contentions raised by the petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate application before the Court for recalling the order under Revision. If any such application is made, the Court below shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. No costs. _____________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 08.11.2010 KLP