¢2§§N THE HIGH §0URT OF JUDICATURE AT BILA§PUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION (.s) N0. "573%[2006 PETITIONER : / Gaindlal S/o— Birjhuram Aged about 59 years, R/o— Village Taraud Tahsi! Barod, District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPOJWDENLS /: 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through—the Secretary, Water resources Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Q 4 .00 L kaéy wry /: ”a?” \0w I 2. Sub—Divisional Officer Kharkhara, Mohdipat Canal P i Project Sub—Division no.1, yék Sambalpur District—Durg (C.G.) x ‘WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES _226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Q HIGH C T OF CH . ATTISGA H AT ILASPUR W. P. (5L& 5276 of 2006 Pefi‘rioner : Euindlal Versus Respondents 5fafe of Chhnmsgarh and anofhzr SB: Hon‘bk Mr. Jusfice Safish K, Agniho‘h'i, J Shri Anoop Mazumdar, Advocafe for 1'he pefh‘ioner. Smf. Anju Ahuju, Depufy Govt Advacu‘l’e for fhe respondenfs/Sfafe. Bablu O R D E R (Passed on 'Hnis 2““ day of February, 2007) Lmmed counsel appearing for the pe'ri‘rioner as we“ as learned Depuw Governmen‘r Advooo'te appearing for fhe respondem’s/Sfofe join'Hy submi'r mot fhe focfs of fhe present case ore similar to moi of in w. P. No. 454/2005 (Ram rmsaa yaduv n mars vs. 5mm of Chha‘h'isgarh (3i others), which was aiiowed vide order du‘ted 4.1.2007. They further submit that the question of low involved is also the same. In view of the above stated submissions made by learned counsel for J the parties, the writ petition is attained of in terms of the order dated 4.1.2007 passed by this Court in W. P. No. 454/2005, No order as to C05fs. l Sd/- . l Satish K. Agnihotn J Judge i l l 1