IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 5TH MARCH 2010 / 14TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 7123 of 2010(M) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): P ---------------- 1. BOSE, S/O.THOMAS, AGED 48 YEARS, PUTHANPURACKAL HOUSE, KOTTAPPADY VILLAGE, AYROOR KARA. 2. NARAYANAN , AGED 67 YEARS, S/O.KUNJINAN, OORIYEL HOUSE,KOTTAPPADY VILLAGE, AYROOR KARA. 3. PRAKASH, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.KRISHNANKUTTY, VENGOLAKUDY HOUSE, KOTTAPPADY VILLAGE, AYROOR KARA. BY ADV. SRI.PEEYUS A.KOTTAM RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM, COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, COCHIN- 682 030. 2. DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER(HEALTH), DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICE, GENERAL HOSPITAL, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-682 011. 3. KOTTAPPADY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KOTTAPPADY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 4. KERALA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, DISTRICT OFFICE, GANDHI NAGAR, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-682 020, REPRESENTEDE BY ITS SENIOR ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER. 5. ANIL, AGED 42 YEARS,S/O.KUMARAN, MANGATTU HOUSE, KOTTAPPADY PO AND VILLAGE, AYOOR KARA. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. K.K. DEEPA SC FOR PCB SRI. M.K. CHANDRAMOHAN DAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.7123 OF 2010 (M) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T Complaint raised in this writ petition is that the 5th respondent is running a poultry farm without any licence either from the Panchayat or any other authority. It is seen that the petitioner has filed Ext.P2 complaint before the 3rd respondent making this allegation. According to the learned counsel even on receipt of Ext.P1 Panchayat has not taken any action. Therefore, the writ Petition is filed. 2. If as stated Ext.P1 has been received, it is directed that the 3rd respondent shall take necessary action on Ext.P1, but however the same shall be only with notice to the 5th respondent. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 4 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. It is made clear that this court has not pronounced anything on the merits of the case. Writ Petition is disposed of. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :