IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH JUNE 2007 / 23RD JYAISHTA 1929 WP(C).No. 13637 of 2007(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ VIMALA CHANDRAN, W/O. CHANDRAN, KOPPARA HOUSE, SAMUGHAMADOM, THEKKENADA, GURUVAYOOR. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.SHAJI RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. CANARA BANK, GURUVAYUR-680101 (THRISSUR DISTRICT), REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER. 2. P.P. KUTTIKRISHNAN NAIR, SREEKRISHNA VILAS, SABHAYIL PARAMBU, KAKKAD, GURUVAYOOR P.O., GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. K.R.SUNIL KUMAR, "SREE PADMA", SABHAYIL PARAMBU, KAKKAD, GURUVAYOOR P.O., GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.GOPINATH MENON, SC, CANARA BANK THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================================= W.P.(C).No.13637 of 2007 ================================== Dated this the 13rd day of June, 2007 J U D G M E N T Petitioner's application for loan was refused to be considered by the 1st respondent bank on the ground that W.P(C).No.1311/2007 in respect of the property, which is offered as security, is still pending. The petitioner approached this court stating that the contention of the respondents was wrong since the said writ petition was disposed of as per Ext.P5, in favour of the petitioner. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the bank submits that now that the writ petition has been disposed of, the bank would process the application of the petitioner for loan in accordance with law and, the rules and guidelines applicable to such loans in the 1st respondent bank. This is recorded and the writ petition is closed. This shall not be taken as an undertaking by the bank that the loan would be sanctioned, but only that the application would be considered in accordance with law. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge. 2