IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 28TH AUGUST 2009 / 6TH BHADRA 1931 WP(C).No. 25018 of 2009(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- DEVASSY, AGED 72 YEARS, S/O.LATE VARKEY, PUTHUSSERY HOUSE, AAZHAKAM KARA, KARUKUTTY VILLAGE, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH VIJAYAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM CIVIL STATION BUILDINGS, KAKKANAD, KOCHI-682 027. 2. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ERNAKULAM. 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ERNAKULAM RURAL, ALUVA. 4. N.V.MARTIN, NEDUNGADAN HOUSE, ANGAMALY. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P. NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: shg/ V.GIRI, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = W.P.(C). No. 25018 OF 2009 = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = Dated this the 28th day of August 2009. JUDGMENT The licence issued to the 4th respondent who along with his father own a property on the southern side of the petitioner’s property, for a Cracker unit was cancelled as per Ext.P1. According to the petitioner, notwithstanding the cancellation of the licence, unauthorized activities are conducted the 4th respondent. This is highlighted in Ext.P3 representation submitted before the first respondent. This writ petition has been filed alleging delay and inaction in relation to Ext.P3. 2. I heard learned Government Pleader also. 3. First respondent shall look into Ext.P3 and take appropriate action to see that unauthorized activity, if any, by the 4th respondent is abated. Any such action against the 4th respondent shall be taken within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, only after notice to the 4th respondent and after hearing him as well. Writ petition is disposed of as above. (V.GIRI) JUDGE kkms/