IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc M- 38178 of 2010 Date of decision: 7.2.2011 Sukhwant Singh and anr …Petitioners Versus State of Haryana …Respondent Present: Mr RD Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr HS Deol, Addl AG Haryana. S.S.SARON, J. Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioners pray for pre-arrest bail in a case registered against them on 24.9.2010 for the offences under Sections 323, 324, 326, 341, 148 and 149 IPC. In the incident that occurred in the present case on 24.9.2010, Sukhwant Singh (petitioner-1) is attributed role of causing grievous injury on the right thumb of Sukhwinder Singh. Besides, the car of Amrik Singh (petitioner-2) was used in the crime. It may be noticed that a cross case is also registered against the complainant’s side in respect of the same occurrence by way of FIR 161 dated 25.9.2010 for the offences under Sections 323, 324, 326, 341, 148 and 149 IPC. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the complainant side approached this Court and the concession of anticipatory bail has been granted to some of the accused namely Daljit Singh, Harwinder Singh and Sukhdev Singh. He has, however, not been able to Cr Misc M- 38178 of 2010 2 spell out as to what roles have been attributed to the said accused, who have been granted the concession of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel for the State submits that Amrik Singh along with others had attacked the complainants. In the circumstances, the petitioner cannot claim parity. Specific roles have been attributed to the petitioners. It is a case of free fight and the Police is to investigate as to which of the parties is the aggressor. A grievous injury, as already noticed above, is attributed to petitioner-1 (Sukhdev Singh). Besides, the vehicle used in the incident belongs to Amrik Singh (peititoner-2). In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, no ground for pre- arrest bail is made out. This petition is dismissed. 7.2.2011 ( S.S.SARON ) ASR Judge