IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.40 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.40 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.40 OF 2008 IN IN IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.36 OF 2008 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.36 OF 2008 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.36 OF 2008 Mohammed Akbar Abdul Wahid .. Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mrs.Shabana Shah i/b. A.Q.Usman for the applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 16th April, 2008. DATED : 16th April, 2008. DATED : 16th April, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned Counsel appearing on both sides. 2. The learned Trial Judge has convicted the revision petitioner. Criminal Appeal No.153 of 2004 is dismissed by the learned Addl.Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai. The case of the present applicant is that he came to be arrested on the spot of incident. This fact has been confirmed by both the Courts below. Hence, it will not be possible to accept the request of the present applicant for bail pending revision. By August, 2008, revision petitioner can apply for fixing the matter on Board for early hearing. 3. Bail application stands rejected accordingly. (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.)