IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE THURSDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2007 / 21ST PAUSHA 1928 WP(C).No. 1344 of 2007(I) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ NOORJAHAN, W/O.ABDUL AZEEZ, AGED 35 YEARS, KOCHUVILAPARAMBIL HOUSE, THODIYOOR NORTH P.O., KARUNAGAPPALLY TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1.THE THAMARAKULAM PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2.THE SECRETARY, THAMARAKULAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, THAMARAKULAM (PO), MAVELIKARA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No.1344 of 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated: 11th January, 2007 JUDGMENT The grievance of the petitioner who propose to start a wire cut bricks unit within the limits of the 1st respondent-Panchayat is that in spite of Ext.P7 undertaking and the circumstance that other similar units are allowed to function within the limits of the Panchayat, the Panchayat is not taking any action on Ext.P5 application submitted by the petitioner. I do not propose to take a decision on the grounds which are raised. But Ext.P5 is obviously pending before the Panchayat and Ext.P7 undertaking has been submitted by the petitioner to the Panchayat. The 1st respondent-Panchayat will take up Ext.P5 application immediately, consider the same in the light of Ext.P7 undertaking submitted by the petitioner and take into account the circumstance that similar other units are functioning within the limits of the Panchayat, hear the petitioner and take a decision on Ext.P5 at the earliest and at any rate within one month of receiving a copy of this judgment together with a copy of the Writ Petition and all the exhibits. The Writ Petition will stand disposed of as above. srd PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE W.P.C.No. - 2 -