IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2705 of 2011 LALO DEVI & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 01.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and for the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged against the petitioners to have enticed away the daughter of the informant. The statement of the victim under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has been recorded where she claims herself to be 20 years of age, but the Court assessed her age between 15 to 16 years. In 164 Cr.P.C. statements victim has claimed to have married with Ranjit of her sweet will. Since her father wanted to marry with an old man due to sep mother in the house. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no medical examination of the victim has been done to assess the age of the victim. 2 Considering the statement of 164 Cr.P.C. of the victim, let the petitioners, namely, 1. Lalo Devi, 2. Sarswati Devi and 3. Sumitra Devi be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Shivhar at Sitamarhi in connection with Tariyani P.S. Case No. 52 of 2010. Bhardwaj ( Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)