FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.8232 OF 2007 -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Mr.P.R.Arjunwadkar for the petitioner. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED: 21ST FEBRUARY, 2008 DATED: 21ST FEBRUARY, 2008 DATED: 21ST FEBRUARY, 2008 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. This petition impugns the following order: . The application is allowed as under: . The Respondent is directed to give vacation access of the child to the Petitioner from 11.11.2007 to 13.11.2007. The Petitioner will collect the child from the residence of the Respondent at 10.00 a.m. on 11.11.2007 and will return the child at 7.00 p.m. on 13.11.2007 at Respondent’s residence." 3. Mr.Arjunwadkar, learned counsel submits that the family court while passing the impugned order did not interview the child which was necessary in the facts of the present case. Looking to the order impugned in the present writ petition, in my opinion, I need not enter into merits of the case since the petition has become infructuous. Hence the petition is disposed of as infructuous. All contentions of the petitioner including the one canvassed by Mr.Arjundwadkar, learned amicus in the matter is kept open. The Family Court while passing similar order in future or disposing of M.J.Petition No.A-2150 of 2007 shall consider the contentions of the petitioner on merits and deal with the case in accordance with law. With these observations the writ petition is disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)