IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M.No. M-33012/2010(O&M) Date of decision:22.11.2010. Narain Singh @ Kallu ....................Petitioner v. State of Punjab .....................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh Present: Mr.DS Pheruman,Advocate for the petitioner. Jaswant Singh.J.(Oral) Prayer under Section 438 Cr.PC is for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR no.212 dated 10.9.2007 under Sections 302,307,324,323,148,149 IPC, read with Sections 25/27/54/59 of the Arms Act, PS Sujanpur, Distt. Gurdaspur. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner after investigation was found innocent and accordingly his name was put in column no.2. However, learned trial Court on an application under Section 319 Cr.PC moved by the prosecution has summoned the petitioner to face trial as an additional accused. It is submitted that at this stage the purpose of the Court is just to secure the presence of the petitioner and hence prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and keeping in view the serious nature of allegations which are based on the eye witness account, no ground for extending the concession of anticipatory bail is made out. Further the case is at the stage of recording of prosecution evidence and possibility of petitioner influencing the prosecution witnesses cannot be ruled out. Dismissed. 22.11.2010 (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge