IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46402 of 2009 SAIFUL SON OF LATE LAUDDIN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12/01/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 395 and 399 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that it is a case of misuse of privilege of bail for a period of more than two years, the petitioner has remained in custody about six months, let the petitioner above named, who be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of District & Sessions Judge, Katihar, in connection with G.R. Case No. 2172 of 1990 arising out of Azamnagar P.S. Case No. 176 of 1990 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner.(ii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date 2 and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The learned Magistrate is directed to commit the case immediately since the case is of the year 1990 so that there is no further delay in conclusion of the same. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)