$§§§£L£ §Ei¥i3§§ C g O y .M‘” IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P. S No. \‘l‘g \ Izow Lo\\ PETITIONER / Smt. Nirmala Bijwe W/o Shri Sharad Kumar Bijwe, Aged about 50 years \N\ \ eé “a x RESPONDENTS : /’1. State ofChhattisgarh, Through — The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer District Durg (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH 2 BILASPUR WRIT PETI‘HON (S) NO‘ 1251 OF 2011 PETmONER Smt. Nirmala Bijwe Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Pe‘iition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of tndia) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Vipin Tiwari, Advocate forthe petitioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Dy. Advocate General for the State! respondents. . ORDER LORAL) {Passed on this 7‘“ day of March, 201 1) 1t Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2, Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to benetlt of two advance increments on account of the fact that the petitioner has passed B.Ed. examination on 24.09.1981 before entering into the service i.e. on 13.1 2.1 984, at her own cost. 3, Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue invoived in the present case is no longer res integra, as the same has been considered and decided by the Supreme Court in Ashe Saxena v. State of MP. & Ors.’ as weii as by this Court in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj v. Municipal Corporation, Durg and enema/2 and Gopesh Kumar Verma v. The state Govt. of Chhattisgam and another? 4. Learned counsel further submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision as atorestated. Thus, the petitioner may ‘ 2009 (iii) MPJR (so) 59 2 2ooe (ii) Mme—cs ea 3 we (e) Nomad of 2005 be permitted to make a representation to decide her case in the light of aforestated decisions, subject to verification of the facts asto whether the petitioner has acquired B.Ed. certificate on her own expenses before entering into service Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with law and in the light of the. decisions of the Supreme Court in Ashe Saxena (supra), within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. in view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. x aehok