THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.15995 of 2009 ORDER: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Eswaraiah) Aggrieved by the order, dated 21-04-2009, passed by the A.P.Administrative Tribunal in M.A.No.1585 of 2007 in O.A.No.6225 of 2005, dismissing the application filed by the petitioner for implementation of the order passed in O.A.No.6225 of 2005, this writ petition has been filed contending that dismissal of M.A.No.1585 of 2007 following the earlier Full Bench Judgment of the Tribunal in O.A.No.7626 of 2005 and batch, dated 11-06-2008, holding that separate miscellaneous application for implementation of the order passed by the Tribunal is not maintainable, is illegal and arbitrary, as the Tribunal has got powers under the contempt of court to issue orders for violation or disobedience of the order of the Tribunal. However, learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that pursuant to disposal of O.A.No.6225 of 2005, dated 01-03-2006, directing the respondents herein to consider the case of the petitioner for absorption in any one of the existing vacancies of Health Assistants, the Government issued proceedings in Memo No.22021/K2/2006-3, dated 09-01-2007 stating that as per the order of the Government in G.O.Ms.212, dated 22-04-1994, NMR’s/consolidated pay workers, who have completed five years of service by 25-11-1993, are eligible for regularization of their services. But, the petitioner was appointed on 20-01-1992 and he has not completed five years of service as on 25-11-1993 and, therefore, the petitioner is not eligible for regularization under the Government Scheme. If that be so, we are of the opinion that the order of the Tribunal has already been complied with. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the said order, dated 09-01-2007, it is always open to him to question the same. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, we do not see any error apparent on the face of the record. Therefore, the writ petition is devoid of merit and the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J ________________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J Dated: 06-08-2009 Prv