1 S.B.Cr.Misc. IInd Bail Appli. No.6047/2007 (Rajkumari Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : February 08, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Dron Kaushik, for the petitioner. Mr.J.P.S.Choudhary,P.P. for the State. This is second bail application. While dismissing the earlier bail application, the petitioner was granted liberty to file a fresh bail application after the statements of three witnesses viz. Kheraj, Rajendra and Panna Ram are recorded. These witnesses have been examined. I have carefully gone through the statements of the witnesses named above, who directly implicate the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the head injury has not been assigned to the petitioner. Be that as it may, there are injuries, which the deceased suffered at the hands of accused and as per the statements of the witnesses, the petitioner participated in the occurrence and caused the injuries to the deceased which is evident from post 2 mortem report. In the circumstances, therefore, in my view, it is not a fit case to release the petitioner on bail. The bail application filed by the petitioner under section 439 Cr.P.C. is, therefore, dismissed. However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the case. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-