IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC SATURDAY, THE 20TH AUGUST 2011 / 29TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 22682 of 2011(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ARJUN.K.V,KAYITHAMANATHARAYIL HOUSE, KUMARAMANGALAM.P.O,THODUPUZHA,IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.UNNIKRISHNAN.V.ALAPATT RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REGIONAL OFFICER,CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION,REGIONAL OFFICE, CHENNAI-600001. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, NEW DELHI-110 011. 3. THE PRINCIPAL,VIMALA PUBLIC SCHOOL, THODUPUZHA-685584. SC SRI.DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 22682 of 2011 APPENDIX EXHIBITS EXT.P1- TRUE COPY OF THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE THODUPUZHA MUNICIPALITY EXT.P2- TRUE COPY OF THE PASS CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS EXT.P3- TRUE COPY OF THE MARK LIST ISSUED BY THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS EXT.P4- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER (True copy) P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).22682/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 20th day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioner was a student of the School of which the third respondent is the Principal. According to the petitioner, in the School records and the certificates issued by the respondents, his date of birth has been recorded as 14.2.1990 instead of 14.2.1989. Therefore, he made Ext.P4 application to the third respondent which has not been forwarded to the first respondent. 2.Heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents 1 and 2. 3.According to the learned Standing Counsel, once the application is received, the School authorities will have to consider the application and if correction is ordered in the School records, the application will have to be forwarded to the first respondent and it is there upon that the first respondent will conduct enquiry and pass orders on the application. W.P.(C).22682/11 2 4.Such being the procedure, the writ petition is disposed of directing that on the production of a copy of this judgment, the third respondent will consider Ext.P4 and if correction is ordered, the third respondent will forward the application to the first respondent for appropriate action. This shall be done by the third respondent as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the first respondent shall complete the process within eight weeks of receipt of the application from the third respondent. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs