FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.757 OF 2004 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders. of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Shitole, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE,J. DATED : 12/1/2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This is an appeal filed by the State impugning a judgment and order passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate on 18.11.2003 acquitting the accused for offences punishable under Section 16 and 17 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act. It is seen from the impugned judgment and order that the sample of Kolikola was taken and sent to Public Analyst and not found upto the standard. Amongst several reasons stated for acquittal, one reason is that the sample was analysed after 38 days. Public Analyst was not examined. In the circumstances, not as fit case to interfere. Hence, leave refused. Consequently the appeal stands dismissed. (R. S. MOHITE, J.) :2: