IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-27660 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 20.10.2009 Shila and another .. Petitioners v. State of Punjab .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Ramneek Vasudeva, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. A. S. Brar, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Satbir Gill, Advocate for the complainant. .. Rajesh Bindal J. While issuing notice of motion on 6.10.2009, following contentions of learned counsel for the petitioners were noticed: “ Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the only allegation against petitioner No. 1 in the FIR is that she had hit the husband of the complainant with a stick on his shoulder. The allegations against petitioner No. 2 are quite general in nature, levelled just with a view to implicate her. The persons to whom grievous injuries have been attributed are already in custody. Petitioner No. 1 is old lady whereas petitioner No. 2 is having three minor children.” Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Jaspal Singh, submits that the petitioners have already joined the investigation and their custodial interrogation is not required. In view of the stand of learned counsel for the State, interim order dated 6.10.2009, passed by this Court, is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 20.10.2009 mk