IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR .P. s Wwgr Chatur Singh Dixit S/o Daulat Singh. Aged about 65 years, R/o PETITIONER Village Bhatgaon, Tahsil Bhilaigarh, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENDS : 1. t/ State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary School Education" Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 The District Education Officer, Baloda Bazaar, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3. K The Block Education Officer, / Bhilaigarh Distt. Raipur (C.G.) The Accountant General, of Chhattisgarh, Accountant General Offlce Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA W f HIGH COURT OF QHHATTI$GARH AT BILASPUR N w m~ m WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTwN 9F mDlA (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Sam K. Agnihohi._J.) Present :- Shri Vinit Kumar Pandey, Advocate for ths» petitioner. Shti P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for tha State; . Shri Anand Verma, Advocate for rapongent no.4. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 31‘ of Mamh,_2010) With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is heard fnaily 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submis that the case o being payment of reliral benems manor may be referred to the pension commmee 2. This Court, in the matter of W.P. No. 4&212004 (Baymm Mama! nrTbe swag ofc/rframkgem & Otters? and other connemd mama‘s, direcmdrthe Commituee i0 consider the matter of reiirai dues as me disputed quesiion or facts were involved. The Committee was oonslitund by lire sate Govemment, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in VlhP. No. ‘ 196112006 (Smt K$ Hal CmndWI Vs. 3$$ Gommnwntand WIS) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed ln M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (sum of Clrhmalb‘ & omels v. gained) Mandalandawmel). Thusgthispamon is squarely covered by thel'iudgment and order dabdt31" of Jammy, zoos passed In w.P. No. 464212004 Baijaam madar (supra) as r submitted by loomed counsel appearing forthe pames. With the consent of the parties, thh petidon is aeoordngly deposed of in the same terms i.e. the office of the Advowte Generai is direcmd to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the petidon from the paidoaer and thk coder Thereafter the Committee shall Issue notice m the petitioner and the officers concemed within a further penod of 15 days The Commrbe shall consrder and pass order, m accordance with law, after affordirg \\ proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the \ \ f WRIT PETlTl0N (S) NO 1363 of 2010 a Petitionet) -. ‘ a ~ ChamnSmgh Dam ‘ Vetsus y“ x Respondant k ~M SEtoofChbamagavh&oiiers £9 qmcetsmnoemadmayjile additianal documents, itneoessary. Tha‘entile‘ exe’r‘aise, 'miuazng :sae‘ymént 6r retirét aues"; it any, to:;mé"pen%nei “b ”,cpmptetadjvumin a' perm a; fgyr mpnms‘fmm‘me datga eceiptpf a capy otthjs prder., x e r r “? ’e ii§éner shalt supply exira copy of the pewon i9 the leamed ouhs§;;",appea'ri‘hg“i ’to‘r‘th‘e respondants fgrfotwardmgthe same. Tm th? ommmee’; . Sd/— SATISH K. AGNIHomI Judge " r ‘, An ru ‘_ Jh t c ¥ C