IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 6942 of 2008. Decided on: August 16, 2010. Guman Singh. …..Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & ors. ….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the petitioner: Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K.Sharma, Sr. Addl. AG. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The Writ Petition is filed with the following prayers: “(i) That the respondents be directed to regularize the services of the applicant as per the policy framed by the Respondents themselves regarding the regularization of services of daily waged employees. (ii) That the respondents be directed to regularize the services of the applicant on his completion of 10 years of service i.e. w.e.f. January, 1998, with all consequential benefits thereon.” 2. In view of the intervening developments, in case the petitioner has still any grievance left, he may approach the first respondent, in which case, the matter will be duly considered by the first respondent in the light of the policy regarding the conferment of work charged status/regularization and appropriate action in accordance with law in the matter will be taken within another four months. We also make it clear that the judgment shall not stand in the way of the petitioner working out his remedies before the Tribunal in respect of any matter which requires adjudication under the Industrial Disputes Act and in which case, the Tribunal shall not non-suit the petitioner on the ground of delay since the petitioner has been pursuing the matter before the Tribunal and thereafter before this Court. 2 3. With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. August 16, 2010. ( Justice Kuldip Singh), (karan/vs) Judge.