CM No.9824-C of 2008 in RSA No.1764 of 2008 Present: Mr. Rajinder Sharma, Advocate for the appellant. **** This is an appeal against concurrent findings of the Court below in the suit for recovery of price of goods supplied. The learned counsel states that only question of law arising in this case is that the appellant had taken an objection at the initial stage to the effect that only the Court at Garshankar District Hoshiarpur could have the jurisdiction. This objection has been wrongly considered by the Courts below. The relevant portion of the Section 21(i) of CPC reads as follows: “No objection as to the place of suing shall be allowed by any Appellate or Revisional Court unless such objection was taken in the Court of first instance at the earliest possible opportunity and in all cases where issues are settled, at or before such settlement, and unless there has been a consequent failure of justice.” Learned counsel has not been able to show that there has been consequent failure of justice by the trial of the suit at Chandigarh. In these circumstances, this appeal is dismissed without cost. October 21, 2008 (Ajay Tewari) Sonia Judge