Civil Revision No. 2783 of 2010 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2783 of 2010 Date of decision: 6.5.2010 Bhupinder Sharma ...Petitioner Versus Hardyal Singh ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Sandeep Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. S.D.ANAND, J. The ejectment of the petitioner-tenant from the tenanted premises came to be ordered by both the Forums (learned Rent Controller and also learned Appellate Authority) on a finding that he has been proved to have committed acts which impaired the value and utility of the tenanted premises. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, when called upon to invite the attention of this Court to any fact on the basis whereof he would endeavour to persuade this Court to invalidate the finding could not offer any response. It is otherwise evident from the relevant finding recorded by both the Forums that the evidence adduced in the relevant behalf by the respondent-landlord had not been rebutted by the petitioner-tenant against whom the exparte proceedings came to be ordered after the framing of issues and further after a part of evidence had been recorded. Though the petitioner was represented till the cross- Civil Revision No. 2783 of 2010 -2- **** examination of some of witnesses came to be recorded , the attention of this Court has not been invited to anything in the course of cross- examination which could persuade this Court to fault the impugned finding on any valid score. Faced with the predicament aforementioned, the learned counsel states that the tenanted premises being the only source of income of the petitioner-tenant, he may be afforded a little extra large time to vacate the tenanted premises. The petitioner shall stand dismissed accordingly., However, it is ordered, in the circumstances of the case, that the petitioner herein shall have one year time from today to vacate the premises aforementioned. Further, the petitioner-tenant shall keep on paying rent regularly. The petitioner shall file an undertaking to the above effect within fifteen from today before the Registry of this Court. In case of a default, the petitioner- tenant shall be liable to eviction forthwith from the premises aforementioned. The disposal of this petition in limine, proceeds on an assumption that there is no factual inaccuracy in the averment on behalf of the petitioner. If it transpires, at any subsequent point of time, that this order had been obtained on the basis of any incorrect averment, it (order of this Court) would be liable to be reviewed. Disposed of accordingly. May 06, 2010 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge