IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.13123 OF 2006 & WRIT APPEAL NO : 807 of 2007 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 26/06/2007 in WP NO : 13123 OF 2006 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 The A.P.C.P. Distribution Corporation Ltd., rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, Hyderabad. 2 The Chief General Manager, A.P.C.P.D.L. 3rd floor, Singareni Bhavan, Hyderabad. 3 The Andhra Pradesh Transmission Corporation (AP TRANSCO) Rep. by its Chriaman & Managing Director, Vidyut Soudha, Khairatabad, Hyderabad. .. APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENTS 2, 3 & 5 IN WP AND 1 M/s. Venkataraya Fabres Private Limited, rep. by its Executive Director, Sri Gokaraju Madhu Babu Tirumala Apartments, Street No.10, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad. ..RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER 2 The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Energy Department, Hyderabad. 3 The Superintending Engineer (TL & SS) cum Electrical Inspector, A.P. TRANSCO, Erragadda, Hyderabad. 4 The Chief Electrical Inspector, Government of A.P. Hyderabad. (RR 4 & 5 impleaded as per court order dt. 30.08.2006 in WPMP 22584 of 2006) ...RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS 1,4 & 6 Counsel for the Appellants: SRI N.JAYASURYA Counsel for the Respondents.: SRI C.SUDESH ANAND(SC FOR APSCHE) The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO.13123 OF 2006 & WRIT APPEAL NO : 807 of 2007 COMMON ORDER: (per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) On the letter submitted to the Registry by the learned counsel for the 1st respondent-writ petitioner seeking to post the writ appeal before this Court so as to enable him to withdraw the writ petition, this writ appeal is listed today. The letter submitted by the learned counsel for the 1st respondent-writ petitioner goes to show that the parties have arrived at a settlement and reached an understanding, which is communicated by the appellants by letter dated 24.4.2009 and the same is acceptable to the writ petitioner and therefore, the writ petitioner desires to withdraw the writ petition itself. In view of the above letter seeking to withdraw the writ petition and in view of the submission of the learned counsel on either side seeking to withdraw the writ appeal as well as the writ petition, permission is accorded. Accordingly, the writ petition and the writ appeal are dismissed as withdrawn. However, it is made clear that the letter addressed by the learned counsel for the 1st respondent-writ petitioner, dated 4.5.2009 shall form part of the record. ________________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari _________________________ Justice B. Chandra Kumar Date: 6th May, 2009 Nn/Gurc. THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.13123 OF 2006 & WRIT APPEAL NO : 807 of 2007 (Common order delivered by the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) 6/5/2009