IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6624 of 2010 HULCHUL SINGH @ AMARJEET SINGH, SON OF LATE RABIN SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 08/04/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 342, 307 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. On 8.3.2010 the case was posted for further hearing in the first week of April along with the records of Cr. Misc. No. 1736 of 2010 in which one of the co-accused Chandan Singh has been released on bail by this Court. The submission is that the case was posted for first week of April only for the purpose of grant of bail to the petitioner on the said date. The allegation in the First Information Report against the petitioner is that he assaulted the injured with a sword on the head of one Sikandar Mahto whereas the co-accused Chandan Singh assaulted him with Tengari on the head. The submission is that the injury report reveals only two injuries on the head one of which was simple in nature and the next was opined to be found grievous after further investigation. The said grievous injury was not attributable specifically to any of the accused persons. In view of the fact that Chandan Singh having similar allegation has been granted bail by this Court and the petitioner is in custody since 15.12.2009 and has no other case of 307 I.P.C. - 2 - pending against him, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria, in Khagaria (Chitragupta Nagar) P.S. Case No. 331 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)