IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC NO.438 OF 2009 SHAMBHU SHARAN TIWARI, SON OF SWRI DEOBANSH TIWARI, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA COMPANY SARAI, P.S. SASARAM (TOWN), DISTRICT ROHTAS……………………………………………………………PETITIONER VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH D.M. ROHTAS 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA, SASARAM BRANCH, SASARAM, ROHTAS……………………………………..RESPONDENTS ----------- 3. 21.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Nobody appears for respondent no.2 although the name of the learned counsel is printed on the cause list. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent no.2 had instituted a case bearing Sasaram Town P.S. Case No.40/94 against petitioner and others under sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code with respect to unpaid loan. Subsequently, petitioner has deposited the amount of loan which is evident from Annexure-2. He submits that the informant filed a petition on 19.01.2005 itself before the court below for permission to compromise the matter in view of the loan having been liquidated by the petitioner, but the court below has not passed any order on the same. He prays that a direction may be issued to the court below to pass appropriate orders on the - 2 - said compromise petition. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the prayer of the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ application is disposed of with a direction to the learned court below, which is in seisin of G. R. No.150/94, T.R. No.1162/04/236/08, to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law on the petition filed by the informant on 19.01.2005 as soon as possible. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ application is disposed of. B.T (J. N. Singh, J.)