/ )673 TE HIGH COUT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA-SPUE LVRITVRETITION (S) No.’ H‘WL 131; H Of 2006 PR ETITIONE jay Shankar Dubey, aged about 45 years, S/o Late Shri Duryodhan Prasad Dubey, ssistant Grade HI, Office 0f Executive Engineer, Public Works Department aigarh, R/o: Bajarapara, Bus Dep Road a District — Rai'garh (CG VERSUS ETS SP’QNDEN : / i ; The State of Chhattisgarh rough : The Secretary Public Works Department, Mantrala, D.K.S, Bhawan, Raipur (CG) r xecutve Engineer ublic Works Departme, vision Raigarh, Tahsil d istrict - Raiga C IT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 / OF T CONSTITUTION OF INDI (35(L Vi A , R ng o , ThSil & ) Th , y Ei P nt Di an D rh (G) WR HE N A Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Sa‘rish K . Agniho‘tri, J'. W‘ P. (s1 NQ‘ 4902 of 2005 Vijay Shankar Dubey Pefi‘h'oner Versus Respondenfs The Smfe of Chhaf‘risgarh & anofher By This pe‘ri‘rion, The pefi'fioner has challenged Iegafify of fhe *mnsfgr order dm‘ed 6.7.2006 (Annexure P—l), whereby he has been Transfer-red from Raigarh Division To Ambikapur Circie. Q The main grievance of fhe pe'ri‘i'ioner is Tha‘i he is working as -1.L[ and The Seniority of Assisfanf Grade-III employees are being mainfained circle wise and in support a grada'iion lisf has been enclosed as Annexure P-Z, which has nof Assisfan'r Grade been denied by learned Governmenf Advocafe for 'rhe S‘rafe. Learned counsel for fhe pefifioner submi'ls ThaT if 'l'he order in Tum, 'Hqe responden‘rs be direcfed To decide The same in accordance wifh law. 4. Having heard Iearned counsel for The par‘ries and having regard 1'0 fhe fac'rs and circums‘l'ances of The case, wiThouT expressing any > opinion on Te meriT of The case, The peTiTioner is aiiowed To make h o deTaiIed represenTaTion raising oil his grievances To respondenT No. 1 wiThin 10 days from Today along wiTh a copy of This peTiTion & annexures. On sUch represenTaTion being filed The respondenT No. 1 shall decide The same wiThin a period of 30 days from The daTe of receipT of The said represenTaTion in accordance wiTh law afTer considering all The poinTs raised by The peTiTioner. 5. In The meanTime, Till The decision of The represenTaTion The effecT and operaTion of The impugned order daTed 6.7.2006 (Annexure P-1) in respecT of The peTiTioner shall remain sTayed. WiTh The direcTion aforesaid, The peTiTion sTands disposed of. ConsequenTly, M.(W.)P. No. 3788/06 also sTands disposed of. CerTified copy as per rules. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotr‘i l. Judge