IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 4TH JUNE 2010 / 14TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 16791 of 2010(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SHEEJA.R, W/O.DILIPKUMAR, PBX OPERATOR, CORPORATION OF KOCHI, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-682 031. BY ADV. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA SMT.D.S.THUSHARA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. CORPORATION OF COCHIN, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, COCHIN-682 031. ADV. SRI.PRAVEEN K.JOY,SC,COCHIN CORPORATION FOR R2 MR.ARAVIND KUMAR BABU, GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.S.RAMESH BABU, SC FOR THE CORPORATION THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.16791 of 2010 (Y) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 4th day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is as a PBX Operator, working under the 2nd respondent since 1997. According to the petitioner, the Corporation passed a resolution recommending regularisation of the services of the petitioner and one Smt.K.P.Sreelatha, another PBX operator working in the Corporation. It is averred that Government have passed orders regularising the service of Smt.K.P.Sreelatha, but however in her case alone, orders have not been passed. Complaining of the above, she has filed Ext.P3 representation before the 1st respondent and orders have not been passed so far. It is with this grievance, the writ petition is filed. 2. If as a matter of fact, there are two provisional employees, in whose case, the Corporation has recommended regularisation of their services, there is no reason why one along should be discriminated. Grievance being the above and having regard to the pendency WP(C) No.16791/2010 -2- of Ext.P3, I dispose of the writ petition directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on the said representation as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months of production of a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this writ petition. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg