IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28527 of 2010 1. SHAMBHU DAS 2. Bishpat Das Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 17.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that petitioners are father-in-law and brother-in-law of the complainant. Nature of the allegation is not sufficient to constitute any offence under Section 498A of the I.P.C. as marriage was nine years ago. Husband was dead and no torture was there. Even after his death Rs. 10,000/- on account of his death and Rs. 25,000/- under Indira Awas received by complainant was handed over to petitioner no.2 if it is not being returned, complaint is not the remedy. Taking that into consideration, prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 378(c) of 2008 above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Jamui subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)