IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40285 of 2009 SHYAM BIHARI SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 7.1.2010 Heard. Annexures-4 and 5 which have been heavily relied on by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner before me appear not relevant to the context inasmuch as the inspection by the Pollution Control Board was held in the year 2005 and the organization of the petitioner was established sometimes in January, 2001. As may appear from the two annexures-4 and 5 those are dated in some months of 2009 only after the complaint had been filed and cognizance had been taken. Environmental protection is a subject which could rarely be put on hold as regards upholding environmental position in our society, specially, in view of the acts of vandalizing it. In that view, I do not find it a fit case for granting anticipatory bail. The petitioner should surrender and pray for regular bail which shall be considered on its own merits without any prejudice towards the 2 filing of the anticipatory bail petition before this Court. The petition is dismissed. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)