'"l/'^f '-^ ^sWlE fi, cp / i IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S1NO. ^O^T / 2007 Petitioner : ^JJaunau Ram, Aged about 57 Years, S/o Shri Ram Singh working as Carpenter, in permanent gang, Office of S.D.O. Public Works Department, Sub Division Bemetara, Dist : Durg-(C.G.) R/o Khati, Post - Karesara, Tahsil - Bemetara, Dist: Durg- (C.G.) ^- '..<^0.--"' ^-.^'-w-'" ..•• ^v^ <J~''r:^'!\:--"" -'o~'-'\a .y s^ %..•••• ...'sf C/S" ?<;" A- .^' Versus Respondents iy State of Chhattisgarh Through-The Secretary Public Works Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur-(C.G.) Engineer-In-Chief, Public Works Department, Near 'Rai Bhawan', Dist : Raipur-fC.G.) 3) Superintending Engineer, Publie Works Department, Raipur Division, Dist: Raipur-fC.G.) 4) Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Tehsil 8s Division Bemetara, Dist : Durg-(C.G.) ^" ll' (- 5) The Sub Divisional Officer, Sub Division Bemetara, Tehsil - Bemetara, Dist: Durg-(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ""e^aaA'^- HI6H COWT W CHHATraseARH AT BILASPUR W. ?.(S} No. 1205 of 2007 Petitioner Jhunau Ram Versus Respondents ; State of Chhattisgarh uidothers SB; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J Present: Mc. Rdkesh An-thony, Advocate for the petitioner. fArs. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Sovemment Advocate for the 5tate/re^3ondents. ORDER (Passed on this 1st &uy of March, 2007) 1. By this petition, teamed counsel appearin9 for the petitwner aibmits that the petitioner was employed in the year 1973 as permanent Gangfwm m the Public Works Department, who has worked for more •than 30 years as Sangman seeks a relief that the petitioner being permanent gongman be retired at the oge of 62 years in occordance with the Chhatti^arh Siaskiya Sevak (Adhivardiiki-Ayu) Adhiniyam, 1967 (for short 'the Act, 1967') read with Fundamental Rule (for short- 'F.R.')56. 2. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner attained the status of permanent empioyee, as defined under Rule 2(c) of the Chhattisgarh (Workcharged and Contingency Paid Employees) Pension Rutes, 1979 (for short- 'the Rules, 1979'), framed under Article 309 of the Constitution of India. After howing attained the status of the permcuient employee the petitioner would retire on attainting the age of 62 years on supernnnuation under the provisions of •the Act, 1967. 3. Learned counsel oppearing for the petitioner would submit that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the decision of this Court passed on 4<lt J<aiuwy, 2007 in W.P. No. 108/2005 (Sovind Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others) and o'ther connected matters. 4. Leamed counsel appearing for the reqiondents/State does not di^»utethe aibmissions made by leamed counsel for the petitioner. 5. Accordingty, the petitioner, who is permanent gangmcu-i, is entitted to retire on attaining the age of 62 years in accordance with the Act, 1967. The petition is accordingly allowed. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 5ubhash