THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI C.R.P.NO.3899 OF 2009 ORDER: This civil revision petition is directed against an order dated 19.09.2007 passed in I.A.No.263 of 2007 in O.S.No.1670 of 2004 by V Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, wherein the petition filed under Order VI Rule 17 read with Section 151 CPC to permit the petitioners to amend the written statement by adding para 12-A to the written statement, was dismissed. Petitioners herein are defendant Nos. 1 to 3. 1st respondent herein is the plaintiff and 2nd respondent herein is the 4th defendant. Plaintiff filed suit in O.S.No.1670 of 2004 for recovery of an amount of Rs.2,55,216/- basing on a promissory note. The defendants contested the suit by way of filing a written statement. Now they came up with the present petition stating that the suit pronote is a false document, which is created for the purpose of the suit only. As can be seen from the material available on record, the defendants denied the execution of pronote and receipt and substantial issues were also framed on this point. If the request of the petitioners that this document is a subsequently created one is considered and petition is allowed, it would create a new cause of action, which would change the subject matter of the suit. Further, the trial in the suit was already commenced. There is no illegality or material irregularity in the order impugned passed by the learned Judge and it needs no interference. The civil revision petition is devoid of merits and the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed. __________ 27-08-2009 rkk