IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR C.G. \ SECOND APPEAL No. M L“ / o4 APPELLANT gEFENDANT \ /' Bhagau S/o late Ram J1 Gond (tnbal) M; aéb Aged- about 45 yrs R/O — Vlllage— ’\ Uslapur, Tahsil — Takhat Pur 85 Distt— Bilaspur [C.G.]. VERSUS . ,1 State OfChhattlsgarh 7 Through Collector B1laspur D1stt.— B11aspur [C.G.]. . Sub Divisional Oflicer (Revenue) Kota, Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.). . Halka Patwari, Patwari Halka No.26 Rajswa Nirikshak Mandal— Sakari, Tahsil- Takhat pur, Distt.— Bilaspur[C.G.] . Zila Sahkari Bhumi Vikas Bank, Maryadit Bilaspur, [C.G‘] Through- It’s President PLAINTIFF #‘/5.Vindadin Kachhi S /o Maiku Ram Aged— j , i y: Village— about 53 Uslapur, yrs, Caste- Tahsil — Kachhi, Tqkhat R/VO Pur 86 — Djstt— Bilaspur [C.G.]. t _ _ V, R“ SECOND APPEAL UNDER SECTION 100 THE CIVIL g PROCEDURE conE h gxwruo. WWW ...... . ..............................1 .> WW (Wm 3w afw 33w W“? ma? § fa?m aiaimm $5.3. Haan’bEe Sim Jasike MK. Age rwaf 1?-1 1 -29@§ Shri Sanjay Pateé, c0un5e§ for the appeaani SM Sarageev Agrawaé, P‘L. f0: ihe S$ate. Shri C. D. 3harma, counseh‘ respsndenf N414. Shri Ashish Surana, ceunsei f r respondami Na.5. Leamed ccun$el appearmg f r the appeilari submits 2hai ihe appeliant is aéso pmseni §n the Ceu Heard an applmaticn for wsih awa§ of ihe appeai. Prayer is no: apposed. The awlicatmn is aHewed a d the appeliaz’zt és peE’méited ta ‘ wifhdraw fhés wpeai. Ceasequenh’y, the appea.’ is c: smissed as withdraw NO crater as :0 costs “ N.K.AganN$ Judge §d!— n