IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.6081 of 2010 Date of Decision : 21.9.2010 Ajaib Singh ....Petitioner Versus Sarabjit Singh ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Vinay Kumar Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. There is no legal infirmity in the impugned order. The petitioner by his conduct has demonstrated amply before the court that he is not seriously interested in prosecuting the case. Rather, his conduct reveals that he is interested in defeating the rights of the respondent. The suit was decreed ex-parte in the year 2002 and thereafter on the application moved by the petitioner the ex-parte proceedings were set aside and when the case was fixed for leading evidence counsel for the petitioner pleaded no instructions and the court was constrained to issue notice to him which was served upon his daughter as per the report of the Process Server which is not disputed. The petitioner did not appear even despite service of notice leaving the court with no other option but to proceed against him once again ex-parte. He is facing a suit for specific performance. It is C.R.No.6081 of 2010 -2- evident that he is interested in stalling the proceedings and there is no justifiable reason to condone the lapse on the part of the petitioner. Consequently, the revision petition being without any merit is dismissed 21.9.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss