1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGHCOURT DATED: 07.12.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.(MD)No.5653 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 G.Selva ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director of Collegiate Education, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 006. 2.The Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Madurai Region, Madurai. 3.Cardamom Planters' Association College, Rep.by its Secretary, Bodinayakanur, Theni District. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to send the proposal for re- employment and terminal benefits of the petitioner expeditiously. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Saravanan For Respondents : Mr.M.Govindan, (R1 and R2) Spl.Govt.Pleader For Respondent-3: Mr.M.Mariappan O R D E R This is a writ petition filed by one Professor of Tamil, working in the 3rd respondent College. The 3rd respondent College is a private aided College governed by the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Private Colleges (Regulation) Act 1976 and rules framed thereunder. In this writ petition the petitioner sought for a direction to the 3rd respondent College to send proposals for reemployment and for claiming terminal benefits expeditiously. 2.The Writ Petition, when it came up for admission on 19.05.2011, Notice regarding Admission was given. On notice from this Court, the 3rd respondent was entered appeared through counsel. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 It is fairly admitted that the teacher, who has to retire on 31.05.2011 was given the relief of reemployment. The only grievance was the salary for reemployment was not claimed. 3. When the matter came up on 01.12.2011, this Court requested Mr.M.Mariappan, learned counsel for the 3rd respondent College to find out as to the delay in forwarding the application papers of the petitioner regarding his pension. Today when the matter came up, the learned counsel fairly stated that the petitioner has only given the basic documents for forwarding his pension papers on 25.05.2011 and he has also produced the internal extract of Tapal Delivery book. He also undertook that there was no delay on the part of the College in forwarding such application. With reference to the payment of the salary for the reemployment period he has stated that the amount has been claimed and also been paid during July 2007. This fact is not denied by Mr.M.Saravanan, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 4. Under said circumstances, it is unnecessary to issue any direction to the College, since the College is already on the job of forwarding the petitioner's application. One only expect that there will not be any delay on the part of the official respondents in processing the papers and issuing appropriate pension orders in favour of the petitioner. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Director of Collegiate Education, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 006. 2.The Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Madurai Region, Madurai. 3.Cardamom Planters' Association College, Rep.by its Secretary, Bodinayakanur, Theni District. +1cc to M/s.M.Senthilkumar, Advocate Sr.No.42911 +1cc to the Special Govt.Pleader, Sr.No.42911 mpk ssk/19.12.2011 /6c-2p/- W.P.(MD)No.5653 of 2011 07.12.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/