1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NOS.8499/2008 AND 21/2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3510 OF 2008 (Union of India and another vs. Manik s/o Ramaji Kamble) ___________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 9, 2009 Heard Shri Sudame, learned Counsel for the petitioners, and Shri Harsulkar, learned Counsel for the respondent. Civil Application No.8499/2008 is moved by the petitioners for grant of stay and Civil Application No.21/2009 is filed by the respondent for early hearing. Shri Sudame, learned Counsel for the petitioners, states that this Court has admitted the petition. However, since impugned order is not stayed, the petitioners are not entitled to initiate recovery of amount, which is otherwise recoverable from the respondent. It is submitted that issue involved in the petition is squarely covered by the decision of the Apex Court. It is prayed that if this 2 Court is not inclined to grant stay, in that case, petitioners may be permitted to file application for disposal of the petition since issue is covered by the decision of the Apex Court. Shri Harsulkar, learned Counsel for the respondent, does not have any objection for hearing of the matter finally. In the circumstances, both civil applications are disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file an appropriate application for disposal of the petition, if issue is covered by the decision of the Apex Court. JUDGE JUDGE khj