CWP No. 21179 of 2011 -1- IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 21179 of 2011 Date of Decision: November 16, 2011 Kanwar Pal and others …Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present: Mr. Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate for Mr. J.S. Saneta, Advocate for the petitioners 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. 1. The prayer made in the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution is for quashing of notification dated 01.08.2011 (P-2) issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. It is conceded as a fact that after issuance of notification under Section 4 of the Act, objections under Section 5-A have been filed, which are yet to be finally disposed of. 2. The claim of the petitioner at the present stage would be wholly premature because he may be able to persuade the Land Acquisition Collector-respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to exclude his land from acquisition by considering all the pleas, which have been raised in the instant petition. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. Palika Monga, DAG, Haryana who is present in the CWP No. 21179 of 2011 -2- Court accepts notice on behalf of respondents. Five copies of the paper have been handed over to her. 5. Keeping in view the nature of prayer made in the instant petition, we are of the considered view that the writ petition is wholly premature and the petitioners can raise all the pleas, which have been put forward in the instant petition before the Land Acquisition Collector by pursuing his objections filed under Section 5-A of the Act. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as premature. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (RAJIV NARAIN RAINA) JUDGE November 16, 2011 Atul