1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRI. WRIT PETITION NO.159 OF 2009 (ANIL TUKARAM MANDHRE Vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. D.I.T. PRISONS (E) (R),NAGPUR AND ANR.) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ______________________________________________________________________________________________ By Post. Shri Nitin Sambre, P.P. for Respondent/State. CORAM : A.H.JOSHI & R.C.CHAVAN, JJ. DATED : MARCH 19, 2009. 1. We had orally expressed our concern to the learned Public Prosecutor about the language used in the impugned order. The learned Public Prosecutor had sought time and the petition was ordered to be listed on today's board. 2. Today the learned Public Prosecutor makes a statement, upon instructions, that the impugned order has been recalled by the D.I.G. (Prisons) (E)(R), Nagpur and another order has already been passed granting leave for 14 more days. 2 3. He further states that the officer concerned has expressed remorse for the language used in the order and assures that he will be careful in future. 4. In view of this, no further orders are necessary, the petition is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE RR.