1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 202 OF 2003 Dungar @ Ravi Mohan Sapharia ...Appellant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 309 OF 2003 1. Uma Lahuji Solanki 2. Mauji Hamir Solanki ...Appellants Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1276 OF 2004 Pravin Hirabhai Meriya ...Appellant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr. Landge i/by Mr. M.A.H. Solkar for the Appellants Mr. A.S. Gadkari, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. 2 CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE: JULY 29, 2009 P.C.:- There were three appeals filed, which were heard together, viz., Criminal Appeals No. 202 of 2003, 309 of 2003 and 1276 of 2004. These appeals were filed, in all, by four persons. We allowed the above appeals by our judgment and order dated 28th April, 2009; but in the operative portion of the same, we have not referred, by name, to appellant, Mauji Hamir Solanki, who was appellant No. 2 in Criminal Appeal No.309 of 2003 and original accused No. 3. According to the learned counsel for the appellants, it has created a problem: Appellant No. 2 in Criminal Appeal No. 309 of 2003 has not been let off. It appears to be a typographical mistake, as the appeal already stands allowed by our judgment. 3 2. We clarify that appellant No.2, original accused No. 3, Mauji Hamir Solanki, be set at liberty forthwith, as he had already been acquitted, if not required in any other case. 3. Copy of this order be sent to the concerned jail immediately. BILAL NAZKI, J. A.R. JOSHI, J.