WV ..... v?“ Q‘e'e g4 §'A&ab ..... IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Le) WRIT PETITION No. 2H /2oo?[s.B] PETITIONER Lalitram Nishag son of Kapil ‘RamLNishad, aged abouté/‘Qr: Tahsil and District Mahasamund [C.G.]. VERSUS 45 years, resident WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE ORDERIS], DIRECTION[S] TO THE AUTHORITY TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER %a . : “ RESPONDENTS :— r 1] The Collector, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund [C.G.]. r0? K 2] Rajeshwar Singh Thakur son of r0? t ‘J (o / ar‘r-‘D/ ) ‘ l 9’ Kamal Dev Singh Thakur, aged about 45 years, Resident of village— {q % / a?“g Mudena, Tahsil and District Mahasamund [C.G.]. .4; ‘3 g3] O 9,. The Director, Geology and Mining, Raipur [C.G.] XI—HC—78 3enamRangwkW@,W L% Wm w.j?.27aj.?:2uu.. In 200 WW(W) m$m mna&$§nh; 3Rm£a%aa&w e WW§WW égmm 19.1 .2007: Shri Pravin Twsyan counsel for Shri Parag Koteoha PL for the I By this petition the petitioner is to decide the pending case No. 31 ~ poesibie. The matter has been remant the respondent Nor’t with a direction tc At this stage no direction as pr: only month has rotted by after issuing < No.3. Thus there is no substance in dismissed. the petitioner. espondent/State. seeking a direction to the respondent No.1 8/121 year 2004-05 as expeditiousiy as ted on 12.12.2006 by respondent No.3 to decide the same afresh after due inquiry. ayed for by the petitioner can be. issued as tirection to respondent No.1 by respondent the petition and the same is aocordingiy Sd/~ Dhirendra Mishra Judge P.T.O.