The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Civil Revision Petition No.29930 of 2011 Date: 11th November, 2011 Between: Smt.Dr.Pandyala Parijatha ..... Petitioner and 1.Parashanaboina Muthaiah (died) and 16 others .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.P.Prabhakar Reddy Counsel for the respondents: Mr.K.V.Subba Reddy The Court made the following : O R D E R: This Civil Revision Petition arises out of Order, dated 18th April, 2011, in EA.No.3 of 2011 in E.P.No.52 of 2011 in OS.No.121 of 2006, on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Miryalaguda. The petitioner is judgment debtor No.11. The decree was passed against various defendants including the petitioner herein. The original decree holder died during the pendency of EP.No.52 of 2008. Respondent No.2 has filed EA.No.3 of 2011 for permission to come on record as petitioner in EP.No.52 of 2008 in place of the original decree holder. The said application was allowed after setting respondent Nos.1, 4, 6, 7 and 11 in the EP ex parte. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner, who is respondent No.11 in the EP, filed this Civil Revision Petition. At the hearing, Sri K.V.Subba Reddy, learned Counsel for respondent No.2, submitted that if the petitioner was wrongly set ex parte, he has the remedy of filing an application under Order XXI Rule 106 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, for setting aside the ex parte order. The learned Counsel for the petitioner has not disputed this position in law. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of, without going into the merits of the case and with liberty to the petitioner to move the lower Court with appropriate application for setting aside the ex parte order. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 11th November, 2011 LUR