IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2252 of 2006 RAM PRASAD RAM son of late Sukar Ram, resident of village Chhotakif Nawadah, P.O.- Gaya, R.S. P.S.-Delhi, District-Gaya Versus 1. THE REG.P.F.COMMISSIONER , Regional Office, Employee Provident Fund Organization, “R” Block, R.No.6, Patna. 2. The Chairman, National Textile Corporation limited, A Govt. of India under taking 7 Jawahar lal Nehru Road, Kolkata-700013. 3. the General Manager, Gaya Cotton and jute mills, Gaya ----------- 2 18.02.2010 Heard Mr. Naresh Das learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. R.S. Pradhan learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Employee Provident Fund. The petitioner superannuated from the services of the National Textiles Corporation has filed the writ petition for refixation of the pension under the Employee Pension Scheme 1995 framed under the Employees Provision Fund and Miscellaneous Provision Act, 1952. Learned counsel submits that although the petitioner was entitled to monthly pension of 988/- per month under the scheme but the respondent authorities of the Employment Provident Fund Department has fixed the same at Rs. 608/- per month and he is drawing lesser pension. 2 A counter affidavit was filed on behalf of the respondents and in which it is stated that pension of the petitioner after consideration was revised and fixed at Rs. 682 per month and the arrears arising by reason thereof amounting to Rs. 8369/- has been paid to the petitioner vide pension payment order dated 24.6.2006 placed at Annexure-A to the counter affidavit. The said order also mentions that the pension had been revised and enhanced to Rs. 682/- per month in place of the earlier pension to Rs. 608 per month. Having regard to the statements made in the counter affidavit, nothing survives for adjudication. The writ petition is disposed of. Bibhash (Jyoti Saran, J. )