IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. JUDGMENT Sanwar Mal & ors. Vs. State of Raj. & ors. D.B. Civil Special Appeal (w) No.919/1999 DATE OF JUDGMENT ::: 21st July, 2008. P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SHIV KUMAR SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH BHAGWATI Mr. SR Surana for the appellants. Mr. MS Raghav AAG for the State. BY THE COURT: The learned Single Judge vide order dated July 14, 1999 dismissed the writ petition of the appellants while granting liberty to the appellants for filing representation before the competent authorities. The appellants instead of submitting the representation, preferred the instant Special Appeal. During pendency of the instant appeal, the Division Bench of this Court rendered judgment dated March 6, 2002 in DB.Special Appeal (w) No.1142/2000 in M/s Ved Prakash Ramesh Chandra & Co. & 17 ors. Vs. State & others (2002 (3) WLC (raj.) 207) wherein it was directed that in the larger interest of public, the State Government shall constitute a committee to formulate a policy for allotment of shops. It was further directed that it will be better that the Committee consults the Mandi Samities as well as representatives of the traders and lays down guidelines for making available the shops to the traders so that the object of the Act of 1961 may be fulfilled without causing hardship to the traders and loss to the Mandi Samiti. One month time was granted to the State Government to constitute the committee and it was expected from the Committee to take decision within a period of three months. Mr. MS Raghav learned Additional Advocate General states that pursuant to the direction of the Division Bench, the Committee has been constituted and policy has been framed. In view of these subsequent events, we deem it appropriate to remit the matter to the learned Single Judge for fresh consideration. For these reasons, we allow the appeal and set aside the impugned judgment of the learned Single Judge. We remit the matter back to the learned Single Judge for fresh consideration in the light of subsequent events as indicated hereinabove. The parties are directed to appear before the learned Single Judge on August, 18, 2008. There shall be no order as to costs. Till the matter is decided by the learned Single Judge, the parties shall maintain status quo as it exists today. (MAHESH BHAGWATI)J. (SHIV KUMAR SHARMA)J. PCG