THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6291 of 2009 ORAL ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the docket order, dated 06.11.2009, passed by the VI Additional Junior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, dismissing the application in I.A.No.394 of 2009 in O.S.No.1591 of 2008, filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, praying to club O.S.No.1591 of 2008 and O.S.No.1586 of 2008 and conduct common trial in both the suits and deliver common judgment. 3. The petitioner is the defendant and the respondent is the plaintiff in the suit. 4. For the sake of convenience, in this order, the parties will be referred to as per their array in the suit. 5. It is to be seen that both the said suits are based on promissory notes. In such an event, merely on account of the proximity of the parties and the parties being the same and the nature of the cause of action is the same, it cannot be said that both the suits can be tried together. Both the promissory notes in both the suits have got to be proved independently basing on the evidence adduced. I find no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the trial Court. 6. The Civil Revision Petition is devoid of merits and the same is liable to be dismissed. 7. In the result, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed, at the stage of admission. However, there shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA 22nd January 2010 dr