IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32042 of 2011 Dharmendra Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 28.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The allegations are under Sections 379, 406 and 420 of the Penal Code for having duped his own friend by misuse of the formers A.T.M. card. The petitioner has been identified in the C.C. T.V. installed at the A.T.M premises. The allegation relates to Rs. 1,59,000/-. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has undergone one year and six months of custody. The petitioner is 20 years of age and has no antecedent. Exposing him to the rigours of being in custody may deny him the opportunity for self improvement. Let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection with Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 145 of 2010 (G.R. No. 329 of 2010). Both the sureties must be his mother and father respectively whose photographs and proof of 2 residence shall be appended to the bail bonds to be verified through local police before final acceptance. The petitioner is bound to remain physically present on each date in the trial unless for specified reasons the Court below in its discretion permits his exemption on any particular date or dates. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)