38. cr wp 2101-10.doc RMA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2101 OF 2010 Ashokkumar @ Guddu Rajendraprasad Pandey .. Petitioner Vs The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Ms. Indu Verma for the Petitioner Mr. H.J. Dedhia, APP for the State CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J DATE : 14th OCTOBER, 2010. P.C.: 1. Heard learned advocate for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this petition through jail for release on furlough. After the petitioner preferred an application for furlough, a report was called for. The said report shows that one of the eye witnesses had objection to release of the petitioner on furlough as there was danger to his life. So also, the complainant has stated that if the petitioner is released on furlough, there would be danger to his life. 3. It is on these grounds that the application for furlough came to be rejected. 1 38. cr wp 2101-10.doc 4. The other ground is that the person who was to stand as surety had not produced any document to show his income. Looking to all these facts, no error can be found in the order rejecting the application of petitioner for furlough. 5. Rule discharged. [SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] 2