Hmw CQUWT 0? $HH£WT§S$MWH kW $§LA$WW mVE$IGN WENvGH 630mm : HGWWLE WWE WJEEV $U§3TR CJ. & H€3N’$LE $HR£ $MN§L KURMR mNHA, ML WNW?“ KWWEIKL K3“? N0. W37 m‘ fNWW AWW-ILLANT: Ashwini Kumar, aged abcmt 2&3 wwwimm} yeam, san cf $0naumm, Came“ $a‘mami, resident of Bhainsbod} Teh$i§ Pandariya, Diwmt Kab%rdham, prewnt {widing at Laipur, R3. Lalpur‘ Tehsi! Lormh Digtrict BilaEpur. VER$U$ MWCELUE‘IQNQU$ JxPF’EAL UNQER $E¢3W£§N 173 m3 Ml’m‘mR VEHMLE$ AQ’T, ”$3 Present: $hz’i 8amdeep Shrivastavaf iaamed ccumai fur the appeRant. §RUER (2W January, 2099) The fmmwing ordzer of the Court waa‘n paagad by Rajaw aimma, €.J.: RE$PQNW§NY$ 1. Saniogh Kumar, son 0f Mangai {Mammappkécantm Singh, aged about 31 yeax’s, resyidem of Kharkena, PAS. Him, Occupaton- Driwr 0f Truck Driveé' of vehic!e No.C.G.10/O803, 2. Swapmi Shukla, aged about 41 years, $on of Kanhaiyaiai‘ resident 0wmr of vehicia 0f Mamngw}, BHa3pur, Occupation — Owmer of Truck Na. 0640/0803 3. The National tmurance Oampany mgumr Ltd, Rajendra Nagar Chowk, Bilaspur (CG) RE Shri Ezandcaep 8hriva&tava, maimed www! mt" WE appeiiam iss heard cm awrmwmn. ’2) Awpanam ~ Amwmi Kumar E3 waking enhancement 0f the corrmemation awarcied by the Aciditional Mom Accident Ciaims Tnbunai, Mungeli, Di$tt Bilaspur (mr 3h0rt ‘fhe TribunaQ‘), vide award dated 2?.C382908; pawed in Ckaim Came No.25/2007. 3) As against the compenwtmn 0? R310,C‘:2,200f» Cmimw by We apDQIiam/‘mmmam, by filimg a (31mm patitmn under Emaiimw 1% of the {victor Vehisies Act, f0!” ihe injurm$ wstamed by him in the mm‘w @Caixtim'yt cm mm 2(307, We T¥immal &Wardec3 a mm! gum 0f RaQQiOQW a3 camwmation amng with interest @ 7% per amum fmm the date 0f fixing of the Claim petition tiii the date of actuai payment. 4) Sahii Sandeep Shrivaa‘mva, learned comma far the appeliaht vehameh‘iiy argued that the compehaaition 0i R8.29,0C30/~ awardad by the Tribunal i$ ioh iow ih comparigon m the Sericug haiure of the imuries sustainad by the appeiiaht/ciaihmni in the mater aChioic-mt. 5) The Tribunal awarded R$.15,000f- towards medicai expenaas; Rs.3,000!- for sphoiai diet; RazaOO/n far phwiaai pain and mental whering; and Rs.9,00G/— mwardg i035 0i incame hufferred by the ciaimaht during the pariod when he remained under treatment 0h account ()r the injuriesg ausstained by him in rm motor accident. 6) For the roasono boot known to the appottahtrciaimant, no doctor wa$ examined hetoro the Trtbunai to ostablioh that the injur'iass said to have béem swtained by the appeHam/ciaimam‘ m me mam acddent reawtecf m am! parmanmt dmbiiity. ?’) m mm gtafe of evidance, We do mt find any $mpe for armamement of the compwsatmn awarded by the Tribunal. 8) The apwea! med by the appenant/ctafmamt for enhancemant of the campensatmn; ‘tmrefore! is name m be dmmisSem arm? £3 f‘mreby dé3m§sged aummam’Iy. Sci/- Chief Sd/ Justice ‘ Sum'l Kumar J“dge Sinha $ubbu