IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.17406 of 2011 Date of Decision.16.09.2011 Paramjit Kaur w/o Gurcharan Singh r/o village Kohara, Tehsil and District, Ludhiana .....Petitioner Versus Indian Oil Corporation, G-9, Ali Yavar, Jang Marg Bandra, East Mumbai, through its Chairman and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Rajesh Punj, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner is before this Court aggrieved by rejection of his application to produce certain documents sought by him from the respondents. The Estate Officer has rejected the request on the ground that the documents sought for by the petitioner were not relevant. The issue of relevance of the documents or admissibility of documents before the Estate Officer, will still be a matter that would arise for consideration as a valid ground of appeal when an ultimate order is passed by the Estate Officer. It shall not be possible for Court to monitor the proceedings before the Estate Officer and then give a direction as to what documents are admissible and what will not be. 2. The intervention sought for by the petitioner at this stage is not appropriate and the writ petition is dismissed with such liberty as has been provided above. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE September 16, 2011 Pankaj*