1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.285 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.336 OF 2009 Arvind H. Patel & anr. ..Appellants V/s M/s.Jayesh Builders ..Respondent Mr.Girin N. Pandit, Advocate, for the appellants Mr.Simil Purohit i/b.Ms.Harsha Rele and Ms.Tapasya Mhatre, Advocate, for the respondent No.6 CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATE : 6TH MARCH, 2009 P.C. . This appeal is directed against the refusal of ad-interim reliefs and especially the prayer clause (c-iii) of the Notice of Motion by which prayer the appellants/plaintiffs claim the arrears of compensation at Rs.10,000/- per month from April, 2007, as also the monthly compensation of Rs.10,000/- as provided for in the Agreement of permanent alternative accommodation dated 5th April, 2 2003. 2. Since the appeal is directed against the refusal of ad- interim reliefs, in my view, instead of interdicting at this stage it would be appropriate to direct the learned Judge of the City Civil Court to hear and decide the Notice of Motion including prayer Clause (c-iii) within a period of 8 weeks from date. The defendant i. e. the respondent herein to file his Affidavit-in-reply within a period of three weeks from date. With the aforesaid directions, the above Appeal from Order is disposed of. 3. Needless to say that Notice of Motion would be decided on its own merits and in accordance with law. (R.M.SAVANT, J.)