^S-^2^^-^^^4^__ ^b^^^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CC.G.') CONTEMPTCASe'tMO^t2.0 OF 2011 (Arising out ofW.P.(S) No. 3436/2010) Sinala Benck PETITIONER ^ ^^^'^"^\r^ ^-'^ ^ RESPONDENTS -Akhilesh Upadhyay, aged about 33 years, S/o Shri Omprakash Upadhyay, Working as a Zila Bal Arakshak, R/o Pendraroad, District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS Smt. Alka Sirohi, age and name of the husband is not known to the petitioner, Secretary, Ministry of Personal Grievances, Training Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi Smt. NJdhi Kshibber, age and name of husband is not know to the petitioner, Secretary, Department of General Administration, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Pradeep Khare, age and name of father is not known to the petitioner, Secretary, Department of General Administration, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER SECtION^12 OFTHE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT READ WITH ARTICLE'^15 OFJ^iE_CQNSTITUTION OFINDIA T XI-HC-22 ~5-^ ^\\^\W^,-sna^FT^, f^rray WWIFWW^ 3^?T 'CRT^ G^^G^cf)^ r^/^fj "W^ 200 fsR^sr' W^T^I f^licb 3T[i^I ^RW^f^cT nr h 4-- 3:n^r'^rr^R'^ftn <^i^{<n<fli TnT^f^ fe1cst <p3i^i< ir ^rf^R ^TT^r SB : Hon/ble 5hri Manindra n/lohan Shrlvastava, J. 08-04-2011 Shri Ashok Soni, counsel for the pe|titioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner ^ubmits that the order was passed by this Court on 14-07-2010, but till date, 1|he decision on the representation of the petitioner has not taken and more jthan four months have lapsed. In the petition, it has been stated thaj representation by registered post. Howev^r, there is no acknowledgment of receipt of the representation or order) the petitioner had sent the of the Court by any of the respondents. Under these circumstances, 1 am ijiot inclined to issue notice to the respondents at present. The petitioner |A/ould be at liberty to file fresh petition with specific averments, as to on ^hich date, the order of the Court was received by the respondents. With the aforesaid liberty, the petiti ^n is finally disposed off. Certified copy of the order dated 14-07-2010 be r^turned to learned counsel for the petitioner, after retaining the photocopy ofjthe same on record. Certified copy, as per rules. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge