1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Second Appeal No.138 of 2009. Purushottam Jagannath Makode Vs Nagar Prishad Desaiganj & another Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri P. G. Anandikar, Advocate for the appellant. Coram : A.H. Joshi, J. Dated : 24th June, 2009. 1. Heard Learned Advocate for the appellant. 2. This is an appeal by the unsuccessful plaintiff. 3. Plaintiff has been given a notice that the house in his occupation is in dilapidated condition. 4. The Trial Court has found that the certificate of worthiness of House Exh.13 relied upon by the plaintiff is not proved to be given by an expert, while the other hand the status report about the house being in dilapidated condition is given by the Municipal Engineer is by an expert. 2 5. The finding to above effect recorded by the Trail Court and confirmed by the first appellate Court. 6. Both these findings are most plausible finding. 7. The questions styled as substantial questions of law averred in the memo of appeal do not arise at all for consideration as those are not involved. 8. The appeal has no merit and is dismissed. JUDGE /Muley/