IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH AUGUST 2009 / 4TH BHADRA 1931 WP(C).No. 19884 of 2009(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- C.R. ANILKUMAR, S/O. A. RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR, CHERUVALLIKUDY HOUSE, MANGATTUR, KOLENCHERY, KUNNATHUNAD TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL SMT.AMBIKA RADHAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MUVATTUPUZHA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHOIRTY, MUVATTUPUZHA. 3. THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM. BY GP SMT.M.R.SREELATHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).19884/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 26th day of August, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioner challenges Ext.P2 order passed by the Tribunal dismissing a Revision filed by the petitioner under Section 90 of the Kerala Motor Vehicles Act. Revision has been dismissed on the ground that the allegation by the petitioner has not been attempted to be substantiated. Apparently, dismissal is for non prosecution. 2. I have perused the averments in the writ petition and I heard learned counsel on both sides. It is appropriate that the petitioner is given an opportunity to substantiate his contentions on merits. Accordingly, Ext.P2 is set aside. MVARP.320/08 shall stand restored to the files of the STAT, Ernakulam. Petitioner shall appear before the Tribunal on 5.10.2009 along with a copy of the judgment. Revision shall thereafter be heard and disposed of on merits within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs