IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 9TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 18TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 31833 of 2009(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M.BADAR MOHAMMED, AGED 49, S/O.MYTHEENKUNJU RAWTHER, MATHILINTE VADAKKETHIL, THONNALLUR-PANTHALAM P.O. BY ADV. SRI.R.BINDU (SASTHAMANGALAM) SRI.M.SUNILKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE KERALA HEADLOAD WORKERS WELFARE BOARD, PATHANAMTHITTA LOCAL COMMITTEE, PATHANAMTHITTA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 2. THE SECRETARY, HEADLOAD WORKERS UNION (C.I.T.U), PANDALAM. 3. THE POOL LEADER, I.P.POOL 30, PANDALAM UNIT, PATHANAMTHITTA. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR AND SOCIAL WELFARE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.KOSHY GEORGE, SC, KHLWWB FOR R1 GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.C. SANTHOSH KUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 31833 of 2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 9th November, 2009. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a registered head load worker of I.P. Pool No. 30 of Pandalam Unit, Pathanamthitta. He is suffering from bronchial asthma and he is allergic to fertilizers and cement. Therefore, the petitioner made a request to the 1st respondent to exempt him from doing the work in respect of fertilizers and cement and to permit him to do other work. That was not favourably considered and Ext. P4 notice has been issued to the petitioner as to why the petitioner's registration should not be cancelled for refusing to do the work allotted to him. In respect of the same, the petitioner submitted Ext. P5 objection. By Ext. P6 order dated 7-8-2009, the matter was posted for hearing. Although the matter was posted on 13-8-2009, no further proceedings have been taken on Ext. P6, is the contention raised by the petitioner. The petitioner now confines his relief for a direction to the 1st respondent to take further proceedings pursuant to Ext. P6 and to take the matter to its logical conclusion as expeditiously as possible. 2. I have heard the standing counsel for the 1st respondent also. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the matter as proposed in Ext. P6 and pass orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and all others concerned, including respondents 2 and 3. S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/