IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.Nos.26895 of 1997 and 423,589 and 3182 of 1998 WRIT PETITION No.26895 of 1997 Between: A.P.Electriacal Equipment Corporation, Rep By its Chief Executive K.C. Kabra Sanathnagar , Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal, Hyderabad. 2 A.P.Electrical Equipment Corporation Satff Union , Regn.No.B.1270 , Sanathnagar Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring that the award of the 1st respondent in I.D.No.19 of 1986, Dt: 8-10-1996 is bad in law and unenforcable and pass further or other orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.B.VIJAYSEN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: None appears Counsel for the Respondent No.2: MR.B.G.RAVINDER REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 423 of 1998 Between: A.P.Electrical Equipment Corporation Rep by its Chief Executive Sri K.C.Kabra Ashok Marg , Sanathnagar Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 A.P.Electrical Equipment Corporation Rep by its President Staff Union ,Ashok Marg,Sanathnagar Hyderabad. 2 The Industrial Tribunal, Rep by its Chairman Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the 2nd respondent in E.A.No.5 of 1997 in E.P.No.2 of 1997 in I.D.No.19 of 1986, dt: 3-11-1997 is illegal , void and without jurisdiction and consequently declare that the execution proceedings in E.P.No.2 of 1997 on the file of the 2nd respondent is not maintainable in law and pass such further or other order. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.B.VIJAYSEN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Mr.B.G.RAVINDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.2: None appears WRIT PETITION No. 589 of 1998 Between: 1 K.Venkataiah S/o.Narasaiah C/o.A.P.Electrical Equipment Corporation , Ashok Marg, sanathnagar Hyderabad. 2 K.R.Subba Rao S/o.Subba Rao C/o.A.P.Electrical Equipment Corporation , Ashok Marg, sanathnagar Hyderabad. 3 A.Manikyam S/o.Pullaiah C/o.A.P.Electrical Equipment Corporation , Ashok Marg, sanathnagar Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Industrial Tribunal-I Rep by its Chairman Chandravihar Building M.J.Road , Hyderabad. 2 The A.P.Electrical Equipment Corporation Staff Union Rep by its President B.Veeraiah SRT-15, Electrical Equipment Staff quarthers Erragadda, Hyderabad-16 3 The A.P.Electrical Equipment Corporation . Rep by its Chief Executive Ashok Marg , Sanathnagar Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to call for the records from the 1st respondent and issue an appropriate writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and quash the order Passed in E.A.No.5/97 in E.P.No.2/97 in I.D.No.19/86 Dt: 3-11-1997 as illegal , unjust contrary to law and without jurisdiction and pass such further or other orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.A.K.JAYAPRAKASH RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Mr.B.G.RAVINDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.3: Mr.K.Satyanarayana Rao WRIT PETITION No. 3182 of 1998 Between: A.P.Electrical Equipment Corporation Rep by its Chief Executive Ashok Marg, sanathnagar Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Sri.B.Veerayya S/o.Late B.Rosayya R/o. SRT.15, ECE Staff Quarters, Erragadda , HYderabad. 2 The Presiding Officer Additional Labour Court, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction or writ particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring that the order of the 2nd respondent passed in M.P.No.73 of 1995, dt: 2-9- 1997 is illegal and without jurisdiction and unenforceable in law and pass such further or other orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.B.VIJAYSEN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Mr.B.G.RAVINDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.2: None appeared The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P.Nos.26895 of 1997 and 423,589 and 3182 of 1998 COMMON ORDER: Learned counsel for both the parties submit that the matter has been settled out of Court amicably and the management has agreed to pay an amount of Rs.3,50,000/- towards full and final settlement of the dispute. It is also settled that the workman would be allowed to continue in the quarters allotted by the management till the end of October,2004. To this extent, the workman shall file an undertaking that he would voluntarily vacate the premises on or before 31st October,2004; otherwise, the management is at liberty to take appropriate action. Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of. No costs. 10th September,2004 prk ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Chairman, Industrial Tribunal-I, Chandravihar Building M.J.Road , Hyderabad. 2 The Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court, Hyderabad. 3. 2CD copies