IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC No. 188/2011 Decided on:7.7.2011 _____________________________________________ Kamla Chamola. …Petitioner. Versus A.N. Sharma and another. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Ms. Seema K. Guleria, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). The Review Petition (T) No.46/2008 was disposed of by this Court on 9.11.2010. Operative portion of the judgment reads thus: “In the facts and circumstances of the case and taking into consideration the import of the aforesaid order dated 26th October, 2010, coupled with the communication dated 25th October, 2010, referred to therein, the present review petition is disposed of with liberty reserved to the petitioners to move respondent No.3 within four weeks from today alongwith copy of this judgment for grant of any surviving claim, including any pending retiral benefit qua the deceased employee, late Shri Bhim Dutt Chamola, and in that event respondent No.3 shall finally decide and dispose of the representation after giving an opportunity of 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 being heard to the petitioner within a further period of three months. 2. Thereafter, the petitioner filed representation to the Commissioner, Municipal Commissioner, Shimla vide Annexure C-2 and legal notice was also served upon the Commissioner on 5.4.2011. However, needful was not done for redressal of grievance of the petitioner. Mr. Shrawan Dogra has drawn the attention of the Court to communication dated 22.6.2011 sent by the Commissioner, Municipal Commissioner, Shimla to the Director, Urban Development, Himachal Pradesh whereby a request has been made to release one time special grant-in-aid to meet out the liability. It was followed by another letter dated 28.6.2011 in order to mitigate the hardship being faced by the widow of late Sh. Bhim Dutt, Chamola. The Director, Urban Development, Himachal Pradesh was directed to remain present in the morning session. When the matter was taken up in the afternoon session, Ms. Poornima Chauhan, Director, Urban Development and Mr. Ashish Kohli, Assistant Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Shimla have assured the Court that the needful shall be done by tomorrow to redress the grievance of the 3 petitioner by releasing the grant-in-aid for Municipal Corporation for further disbursal to the petitioner. 3. In view of the assurance held out by Ms. Poornima Chauhan, Director, Urban Development, and Mr. Ashish Kohli, Assistant Commissioner, the present petition is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. No costs. Copy Dasti on usual terms. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. 7.7.2011 *awasthi*