IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2375 of 2007 JAGDISH PRASAD MAHTO @ JAGDISH Son of Raghu Nath Mahto, Resident of Village- Sukhasan, Post Office- Sukhasan, Police Station- Madhepura, Distt- Madhepura ------------------ Petitioner Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. Sri Sunil Kumar Jha, The District Panchayat Raj Officer, At and P.O.- Madhepura, P.S.- Madhepura, Distt- Madhepura ----------- Opposite Parties --------------------- 6. 7.7.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cost of Rs. 500/- as directed by this Court by order dated 20.11.2008 to be paid to learned counsel for the petitioner has been paid which fact is admitted by learned counsel for the petitioner. The only direction in the order dated 11.8.2005 under contempt was that the petitioner shall represent his case before the District Panchayat Raj Officer for ventilating his grievance and the District Panchayat Raj Officer shall consider and dispose of the same by a reasoned order. In the show cause filed on behalf of the opposite party no. 2, the District Panchayat Raj Officer, Madhepura it is stated that the representation of the petitioner has been disposed of by order contained in memo no. 502 dated 26.11.2008 and all his admitted dues have already been paid. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has already challenged the said order by filing a writ petition. In the above circumstances, no case for initiating contempt proceedings is made out. The contempt application is, accordingly, dismissed. P. Kumar (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.)