Single 3ench! c t@ @ IN TEE HGH COURT OF JUDICATUREjgT BILASPUR mp. no. . . .l?r§:7.i.2¢¢5 PETITIONER SMT. TASLEEM mm; 'w/a z.M.Khan aged 63 year5.Re$ident of Kesahkalw Digtt:}3ast ara u RESPQ‘IDENTS : .i- The Accountant Gengral 1"“ \ch ate of Chhatti$garh, Raipur- ii- Th3 Accountant Ganeral Estata of Madhya Pradesh. Gwaliar- iii-The Secretary $cheduled Tribes & Scheduleé Caste 1 & Backward Classses,walfare De§tt, State: 0f Chhattisgarh,R&ipur. iv- The Prim cioaxl K831111611 Boys Higta‘r . Di$ tt; Secmalary Ba-SLbar , C.G.‘ gcnoal. v~ Chie f Executive 0f£icer/Block Davalopment 0f fies r, Janpad Pan chayat ,Pha ra$gaon . Xiistt : Bastar,C. G. i‘jRlTg PETITION UNDER «WARTICLE 2§§é2 27 OF CGI‘ESTI'HJTIQg Qf india L, 4m . x / / XI-HC—22 WW WW wfeHHf-g'a I Shn' Khan submits March, 2004 the amoun petitioner Was Rs. 1,24,744 Learned counsel fqlr the respondents No. 3 to 5 submits that out of Rs. 1,?£4,748] -, the bill for the amount of Rs. 1,16,443l- has beeq prepared and submitted in the .Txeasury, Jagdalpur, and 8,305] -, a certihcate is re The total amount of Rs. 1‘ 15th August, 2005. submits that there may be some Shrl Khan further April, 2004 to June, 2005. The more amounts due h‘om respondents areidirected to calculate the same and if more (when 13.7.2005 Power of Attorney holder of the 51m z. M. Khan, petitionsr. Shri G. K. Bm'iwal, Deputy Advocate General for the Respondents No. 3 to 5. None for the responélents No. 1 and 2. that as per Annexure P/7 up to t of G.P.F. in the credit of the §/-. f for the balance amount of Rs, quired n‘omthe Respondent No.1. 24,748] — will b‘e paid wbefoxe XI—HC—22 amount is payable ”that August, 2005. It is submitted by 1‘ No. 3 to 5 that the amoun certihcate issued by the espondent No.1. The Respondent ‘ No.1 i.e. Accountant Gen is directed to issue neces :in any case, not later the respondents No. 3 to 5 tn ‘1‘ AuguSt, 2005. . to the petitioner befors 15 ling the petition stands disposed of. There shall be no older as should also be paid before 15th :amed counsel for the respondents .t has to be paid on the basis of the In View of the foregc e121, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur saiy eel lihcate at the earliest, and m 10th August, 2005 to enable the > make the payment of G.P.F. dues Sdl- iSatish K. Agnihotrii Judge t (datia‘m ; to costs.