@Qwovci) SINGIE 3%!‘5 RIT PETITION S No. L§$ g OF 2010 6 , Vinay Singh, aged about 52 years, S/o Late Shri Satyabrat Singh, Occupation — Service, Working as Sub-Inspector, In charge of Outpost Smriti Nagar, Police Station Supela, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh ; VERSUS K 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Department of Home Affairs (Police), DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh l / 2. Director General of Police-cum- Chairman of State Police Establishment“ Board, Police Headquarters, Raipur, Chhattisgarh / 3. Inspector General of Police (Administration), Police Headquarters, Raipur, Chhattisgarh / 4. inspector General of Police, Durg Range, Durg, Chhattisgarh 5T, Superintendent of Police, Durg, Chhattisgarh ‘i IT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT OR WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS WR PROHIBITION DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDERS OR ORDERS OR THE LIKE IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGRH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS CERTIORARI HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (SI NO.2551 OF 2010 Vinay Singh Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Present :— Shri R.S. Marhas, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.V. Sridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. 6? ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 19“” day of January, 201 1) Learned cognsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Courtvto withdraw this petition, to which learned counsel appearing for the other side has no objection. Y 2. it is ordered, as prayed for. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sdr— _ SATISH K. AGNMOTRI , Judge We I ctr‘ _.. «e 7 WM/ T