HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 1452 OF 2010 ORAL ORDER: Aggrieved by the order dated 8.10.2009 passed by the IV Additional District Judge, Guntur in C.M.A.No. 8 of 2009 in I.A. No. 1803 of 2006 in O.S.No. 894 of 2001 the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. Petitioner herein is the plaintiff, who filed a suit i.e., O.S.No. 894 of 2001 for recovery of money basing on a pronote. He filed I.A No. 1803 of 2006 under Section 5 of Limitation Act to condone the delay of 333 days in filing a petition under Order 9 Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the default order dated 22.8.2003. That petition was dismissed by the Court below. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the IV Additional District Judge, Guntur and the same was also dismissed for default. Aggrieved by the same, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. As the petitioner was not shown any sufficient ground to condone the delay of 333 days, within the meaning of Section 5 of Limitation Act, the court below held that the petitioner is not entitled for the relief as claimed and accordingly dismissed the petition. Hence, I see no reasons to interfere with the order passed by the court below and the revision petition is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J DATE: 4.02.2011 KA