v~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATISGARHAT BILASPUR C. G. W Petitioner .' Pum' Ram Gupta, aged about. years,son ofLate Shri Gopal Sao, Resident ofRatanpur, Tahshz'l, Kota,District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS w. A. DistrictCo. 0p. Central Bank, Limited Bilaspur. The Deputy Registrar, Shahkari Samitiyan, Bilaspur CG. Haricharan Sahu son 0f Shri Bansilal Sahu,aged about years,resident of Junapara Lormi, Tahshil Lormi,District Bilaspur. WRITPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22 /227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRITIN THE NATURE OF MNDAMUS CERTIORARI, PROHIBITION AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS ORDER OR ORDERS DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. Respondents g) (I) PARTICULARS OF THE PETITION: As shown above in the cause title. (2) PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS : Particulars ofthe respondents are the same as W.P. Newt? o 2004. HI€H COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHAT'FI56ARH: BILASPUR 1 5%ng!e Bench: Han‘b!e Shri 5a§ish K. Agniho’i'r‘i, J. W. P. No. 1041 of ZOG4 Pe‘rifioner : ’Puni Ram Gup‘m Versus Respanden‘rs Dis‘h‘ic'? Ca. Op. Cen'h‘ai Bank Limited :8: others” Shm' RK‘ Jaiswai, caunsel for fhe pe?i‘fioner. Shri Rajesh Pandey, counszl for The respanden'!’ N0. 1. Shri S.L. Kurmi, counsel for“ fhe responden'l' No. 3. ORDER (Passed on 19*“ day of December, 2006) 1A. No. 11068/2006‘ This is m1 appHca'fion for wi‘fhdmwa! of 1'he wri‘r pai‘i'ian on ’Hae graur1&s s+a+ed Therein. The applicafion is qrtier‘ed as prayed fm“. Consequen'Hy, +he wri‘r pe‘l’i‘fion is dismissed as wifhdr‘cxwn. No order as +0 cos-is. ; hm/ g {B i v i i ‘ _ ‘ Sd/- i 1 :gsm'sh 1c Agnihotri j Judge Subhash