HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BlLASPUR PETmONER MCC No.170/2010 Zameela, W/o Late Rashin Mohammad, aged about 55 years, R/o Talapara, Sanjay Nagar, Bilaspur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS 1 6 8 Versus State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, . Govemment of Chhattisgati, Department of Home Affairs, D.K.S.Bhawan, IMantralaya, Raipur, Chhatti^arh The Director General of Pelice, Government of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Chhattisgarft The Inspector General of Poltoe, Bilaspur Range, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh The Superintendent of Police, Bitaspur, District BHaspur, Chhattisgarh The Statton House Officer, Police Station Civil Lines, Districd Bilaspur (C-G-) 1 - _-. Superintendent of Jail, Bilaspur, Central Jait, Distriet Bilaspur (C.G.) Prisoner No.16, Central Jail, Bilaspur (C.G.) Medical Officer Department of .Forensic Science C.I.M.S. Bilaspur (C.G.) - APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION Appearance: Mr.Deepak Jain, Counsel for the petitioner. Mr. ShashankThakur, Panel Lawyer for the Staie/ respondents 1 to 6. Mr. Sachin Tamtakat, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, Counsel for respondent No.8. ORAJ.ORDER (30.03JW»10) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. ^;',CT'att8!»S. B 1%>. MCC No.170/2010 Heard on 1:A. No.01/2010, which is an applteatlon for eondonaUon ofdelay infiling MCC No.170/2010. According to the office report, the MCC is barr«lby 2 days of limitation. On due consideration of the submi^ions trade by learned counsel for the parties, I am satisfied that the petitioner has shown sufficient cause for the delay in filing tte restoration application. Accordingly, I.A. No.01/2010 is altowed and the delay of two cteys m filing the restoration apph'cation J.e. MCC No.170/2010 is hereby condoned. Leamed counsel for the parties are also heard on the restoration application i.e. MCCNo.170/2010. The petitioner is seeking re^oration of W.P(C) No.3507/2007, wrtiich was dismissed for want of proseculion vide order dated 29W .201 0. On due consideralion of the submissions made by leamed counsel for the parties and the grounds taken in the restoration appticatton, 1 am satisfied that the absence of the petitioner's counsel on 29.01.2010, when W.P.(C) No.3507/2007 was taken up for hearing, was laswl on bonafide grounds. Accordingly, MCC No.170/2010 is allowed and W.P.(C) No.3507/2007 is restoredto its origjnaLnumber. Sd/- Sunii Kumar Sinha Judge •^<