CWP No.2088 of 2011.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.2088 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.03.2011 **** Advisor to the Administrator, UT Chd. . . . . Petitioner VS. DC, Chandigarh Administration & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Dr. Sukant Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Senior Advocate with Mr. KK Gupta, Advocate for respondent NO.1 Mr. Vishal Deep Goyal, Advocate for respondent No.2 **** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The Chandigarh Administration seeks quashing of the orders dated 04.09.2008 (Annexure P3) and 25.03.2009 (Annexure P6) passed by the Deputy Commissioner-cum- District Collector, UT Chandigarh declining sanction for prosecution of respondent No.2 under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 on the basis of the FIR No.07 dated 01.11.2007 registered at Police Station Vigilance, Chandigarh. (2). During the course of hearing learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that instead of adverting to their CWP No.2088 of 2011.doc - 2 – respective contentions, let both the orders be set aside with a direction to the Deputy Commissioner-cum- District Collector, Chandigarh to pass a fresh order in accordance with law after considering the relevant material and after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner-Administration as well as respondent No.2. (3). Ordered accordingly. (4). Let the appropriate orders be passed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (5). Dasti . 25.03.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge