IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.842 of 2011 Between: Alla Nagaraju and 3 others ..... PETITIONERS AND Alla Srinivasarao .....RESPONDENT The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.842 of 2011 O R D E R: Heard Petitioners herein are the defendants in the suit filed by the respondent in O.S.456/2009 on the file of the VI Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam for perpetual injunction. Pending the suit, the plaintiff filed an application for grant of temporary injunction, in which an order directing both the parties to maintain status quo was passed by order dated 12.06.2009. As against the said order, the plaintiff himself filed an appeal in CMA.45/2009 on the file of the II Addl.District Judge, Visakhapatnam and the lower appellate Court while setting aside the order of the trial Court dated 12.06.2009, remanded the I.A.456/2009 to the trial Court for consideration afresh by giving definite finding as to who is in lawful possession of the plaint schedule property as on date of filing of the suit. The only grievance of the petitioner is with regard to certain findings recorded by the lower appellate Court. I am of the opinion that when the matter is remanded to the trial Court, the trial Court is bound to consider and pass appropriate orders afresh by giving its own reasons, without being influenced by any of the observations made by the lower appellate Court. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of with an observation that the trial Court shall decide the matter afresh without being influenced by any of the findings recorded by the lower appellate Court in the impugned order. No order as to costs. ________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 01.04.2011 Dsr