IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revision-No. M-102 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 07 November,2011 State of Haryana Petitioner Versus Puran @ Babli ....Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI Present: :- Ms. Shalini Attri, DAG Haryana. M.M.S.BEDI, J. This revision petition has been filed by the State aggrieved by the order dated 13th of August, 2010, passed by Additional Sessions Judge Hisar, dismissing the application under Section 319 Cr.P.C to summon Sampat Singh as an additional accused claiming that the said accused had also committed an offence under Section 376 read with Section 511 IPC as he had advised the prosecutrix to sit in the car of main accused Puran @ Babli. The trial Court on appreciation of material available on record has arrived at a conclusion that Sampat Singh who has sought to be arrayed as additional accused cannot be said to have committed any offence. The perusal of order passed by the trial Court indicates that no illegality has been committed by the trial Court by refusing to exercise the discretion under Section 319 Cr.P.C to summon additional witness. No ground is made out for interference . Dismissed. 7.11.2011 (M.M.S. BEDI) aarti JUDGE