FARAD CONTINUTION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Appeal From Order no.ll2l of 2005 with Civil Application No.l38l of 2005 -------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office Court or Judge’s Order Memorandum of Coram appearence,Court’s Orders & Directions and Registrar’s Order --------------------------------------------------- Mr.G.V.Bhagwat for Divekar and co for appellants Mr R.V Govilkar for respondent no.s l to l3 Mr G.S.Hegde for respondent no.l7 Mr Fanhar Dubhas with Vinod Shinde for respondent no. l4 CORAM; A.M.KHANWILKAR J. CORAM; A.M.KHANWILKAR J. CORAM; A.M.KHANWILKAR J. DATED 13.6.2006 DATED 13.6.2006 DATED 13.6.2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard counsel for the parties. In the fact situation of the present case no interference is warranted. This is so because it is seen that the property has now been transferred in favour of respondent no. l4 by a registered sale deed. The document placed on record by the appellants for claiming title with regard to the suit property is admittedly a unregistered document. Be that as it may. For the reasons recorded by the trial court, with which I am in agreement, no interference is warranted at this interlocutory stage. Instead, the appeal is disposed of by directing the trial court to decide the special civil suit no.l38 of 2005 as expeditiously as possible and in any case by the end of December 2006. All questions are left open. It is brought to my notice that an application to invoke section 8 of the Arbitration Act has been filed before the trial court which is pending for consideration in the same court. The trial court may be well advised to dispose of the said application expeditiously. This direction was issued on the assurance given by the parties through their respective counsel to cooperate with the trial court.