HIGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BIUUSPUR M.A.C.No. 824/2009 SB: Hoa'ble Sluri Jnstice R.L. Jhanwar Appellant Noa appUcant RESPONDENTS AppUcaate Ms/ Rupi Venders, Deater of RaliaBice PetroUum Ltd, fhrougE Partn.er : Baljeet Singh WaUa, Aged 30 years, s/o Giu-udeo Singb. Walia, In front ofAsiatic Oxygen, Ward No. 12, GE Road, Kuiahari, P.S. Kuinhan, District Durg (CG) R/o 214 C Tatibandh, Raipur, PO & District Raipur(CG) Versus 1 Mahendra Kuinar Aged about 51 years, S/o Shri Narayan Prasad Adil, 2 Siat. Usha Devi, ayed. about 46 years, w/o ShnMahendra Kuicar AdU, (Bofh R/o vfllage Semriya, PS & PO Nandiai, Tahsil Dhamdha & Disfrict DuigCG) 3 United India Insucaace Co. Ltd, through Branch Mauager, Arnar Coiaplex Jeevan Bima Marg, Paadri; PO & District Raipur CG (PoUcy N0. 190501/41/05/00032 ejGFective from. 13.9.2005 to 12.09.2006 MI8C. APPEAL V/S 30 QF THE WORKMBB'S COMPENSATIOK ACT Appearance: None for fhe appeUant. None for respondents No. 1 and 2. Shri DashratiiJSupta and Shri Sanjay Gupla, counsel for respondeut No.3. Non applicaat ^sSS-^k.. /^c\.'(•••). k ^. ^j ..ito. ORAL ORDER (19.01.2011) The case was caUed out for heariag twice, but on both ftie occasious, noue appears for fhe appeUaut nor any representation is inade. Siuce fhere te no representation on behalfoftheappcBaat, this Court is lefit with no other optiou except to disiniss the appeal for want ofprosecution. Accordiiigly, fhe appeal is disiiiissed for waat of prosecution. §()/_ R.L. Jhanwar Judge