IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-38834 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : 22.12.2011 Chaman Lal …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another …Respondents ………. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Ms. Deepali Puri, Advocate, for the petitioner. *** Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.175 dated 17.09.2010, under Sections 406/498-A/506 IPC, registered at Police Station Phillour, District Jalandhar. Learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly stated that after investigation challan has been submitted by the police against the petitioner father-in-law of the complainant. Learned counsel has further argued that assertions made in the FIR and entire material collected by the Investigating Officer do not constitute an offence against the petitioner. Alleged interference by the petitioner father-in-law in the matrimonial affairs would not amount to any cruelty to make out an offence punishable under Section 498-A IPC. Learned counsel has further argued that since charges have been framed by the learned trial court illegally, therefore, a revision shall be preferred challenging the order framing the charges, therefore, she may be permitted to withdraw this petition with the aforesaid liberty. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. ( Alok Singh ) December 22, 2011 Judge Anand