1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 210 OF 2008 Mrs.Ranjana Bananrao Undre ... Petitioners v/s Avinash Rajaram Lele, Chairman & ors. ... Respondents ALONGWITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 143 OF 2008 Mrs.Aruna Sambhaji Kamble ... Petitioners v/s Avinash Rajaram Lele, Chairman & ors. ... Respondents Mr.Alok Gupta i/by Mihiir Desai for the petitioners. Mr.V.S.Jagdale for respondents 1 and 2. Mr.A.R.Patel, A.G.P. for the respondent No.4. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 6TH NOVEMBER, 2009 P.C.: 1. According to the parties, an amount of Rs.3,50,000/- 2 approximately is payable as back wages. However, after deducting the statutory deductions including the Professional Tax and the Provident Fund, the amount payable is Rs. 3,31,347/- in one case and Rs.3,36,451/- in another case. Parties agreed that an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- have already been paid to the employees and the balance of Rs.31,347/- and Rs.36,451/- is payable as of today. The learned advocate for the respondent Nos.1 and 2 in both these petitions states that the payments of the aforesaid amounts of Rs.31,347/- and Rs.36,451/- will be made by Tuesday, the 10th November, 2009 by the demand draft. She also states that the petitioners will be provided material to indicate that the Provident Fund amounts have been deducted and deposited with the Provident Fund authorities along with the demand draft on Tuesday, the 10th November, 2009. 2. Both the contempt petitions disposed of accordingly. ..... 3