((-1-)) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3274 OF 2004 IN APPEAL NO.67 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2398 OF 2003 Sanskardham Kelvani Mandal and others Applicants versus State of Maharashtra and others Respondents Mr.M.P.Vashi for applicants. Mrs.Madhubala Kajle for respondents 1 and 2. Ms.Susmita Burman i/by Mihir Desai for respondent no.3. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATE : 9th September 2005 PC : 1. This Notice of Motion has been taken out by the applicants seeking a relief that as the applicant no.3 has been continued in the employment of applicant nos.1 and 2 as a Junior Clerk, the applicant nos.1 and 2 should be permitted to submit the pay bills of applicant no.3 to respondents 1 and 2 so as to enable them to process the same. It is made clear that as ((-2-)) far as respondent no.3 is concerned, there is no dispute that respondent no.3 is continuing as Senior Clerk and the salary has been duly paid. Under these circumstances, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b). 2. At the final hearing of the above appeal it will be decided if applicant no.3 had received any excess salary. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)