Civil Review Petition No. 84/2011 19.7.2011 Present: Mr. Dushyant Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General for the respondents 1 & 2. We have gone through the contents of the review petition. The present review petition has been preferred for reviewing the order dated 29.3.2011 passed in Civil Writ Petition No. 5565/2010. Keeping in view the prayers made in the said writ petition, we have considered each and every aspect of the matter and had dismissed the above said writ petition, with an observation “that the dispute of controversial nature between the parties is involved and such dispute cannot be resolved under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. While dismissing the said writ petition, observations were made that this Court does not wish to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, as such, without making any comments on the merits of the case the writ petition was dismissed. We have heard learned counsel at length. Nothing has been brought before us which could be considered within the scope of Order 47 Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure for reviewing the order dated 29.3.2011. Nothing has also been pointed out which could be considered for reviewing the order dated 29.3.2011 under Article 226 of the Constitution. In these circumstances, we do not find any occasion to review our order dated 29.3.2011. Hence, the present review petition is dismissed. ( R.B. Misra ), J. ( V.K. Sharma ),J. 19th July, 2011(sl)