IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37640 of 2008 Gorelal Sah, son of Bhagwat Sah, village Balua Bazar, Sah Toli, PS Balua Bazar, Dist. Supaul – Petitioner. Vs. 1) The State of Bihar, 2) Shanti Devi, wife of Taranand Sah, village and PS Balua Bazar, Dist. Supaul – Opp. Parties. 2 19.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. This application has been filed for quashing the order, dated 12.3.2008 passed in Balua Bazar PS Case No. 21/2007 by the C.J.M, Supaul by which cognizance has been taken for the offences alleged to have been committed for the offences under sections 323, 341, 504, 354/34 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from a plain reading of the First Information Report / complaint it is apparent that the case is false and fabricated. It is submitted that the case has been lodged because of some land dispute. It is further submitted that it cannot be believed that the petitioner entered the house of the complainant and tried to out rage her modesty and committed theft of just one item of the house. The entire episode appears to be false. These aspects of the matter can be considered by the court at the appropriate stage. For the present I find no illegality in the impugned order. This application is dismissed. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)