IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3144 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: September 16, 2011. Rakesh Kumar and another. ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus Om Parkash and another. ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Vivek Suri, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Arun Jindal, Advocate for respondent no.1. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) CR No.3144 of 2011 Petitioners have invoked supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside impugned order dated 26.03.2011, Annexure P5 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Patiala vide which petitioners-defendants have been directed to place on record the documents and subsequent order dated 20.04.2011, Annexure P6 vide which petitioners-defendants have been given last opportunity for producing the said documents. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record including the impugned orders passed by learned trial Court. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioners- defendants that the impugned order has been passed without discussing anything and without even coming to the conclusion that the documents are necessary for the decision of the controversy between the parties. It has also been contended that application under Order 7 Rule 14 read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure has been filed by respondent-plaintiff and however, present petitioners-defendants have been directed to produce the documents without passing any speaking order on the said application. Hence, in view of these facts, the present revision petition is accepted and the impugned orders are, hereby, set aside. Learned trial Court is directed to pass a speaking order after hearing both the parties on the application for production of documents filed by the respondent-plaintiff. Disposed of accordingly. 2 CR No.3144 of 2011 ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) September 16, 2011. JUDGE 'om’ 3