HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Special Leave to Appeal No.32 of 2011 In Government Appeal No.24 of 2011 State of Uttarakhand ....Applicant/Appellant Versus 1. Pravesh, S/o Surendra, R/o Village Mundlana, P.S. Manglore District Haridwar. 2. Sudhir, S/o Salekh Chand, R/o Kuankhere, P.S. Laksar, District Haridwar. 3. Papla @ Om Prakash, S/o Rakam Singh, R/o Khanpur, P.S. Khanpur District Haridwar. 4. Sunil Kumar, S/o Kunwar Pal, R/o Dhandheki, P.S. Laksar District Haridwar. 5. Anuj Saini, S/o Janeshwar, R/o Gali No.6 Krishna Nagar, P.S. Gangnahar, Roorkee District Haridwar. ...Respondents Mr. Amit Bhatt, AGA present for the appellant/State. Coram: Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Prafulla C. Pant, J. (Oral) (Delay Condonation Appl. No.297 of 2011) Heard. 2. This is delay condonation application no.297 of 2011 for condonation of delay in filing the appeal against the impugned order dated 20.11.2010 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/I Fast Tract Court, Haridwar in Sessions Trial No.461 of 2000 whereby the accused respondents are acquitted from the charge of offence punishable under 2 Sections 364, 302/34, 201 I.P.C. and accused respondent Sudhir has been further acquitted from the charge of offence punishable under Sections 489-A, 489-B, 489-C, 489-D, 472 and 292 I.P.C. 3. Delay is sufficiently explained in the affidavit. Delay condonation application is allowed. Delay is condoned. 4. Also heard, on leave to appeal and perused the impugned judgment challenged before this Court under Section 378 of Cr.P.C. 5. Leave to appeal application no.32 of 2011 is allowed. Leave is granted. 6. Admit the appeal. 7. Summon the lower court record. 8. Issue bailable warrants against respondents Pravesh, Sudhir, Papla @ Om Prakash, Sunil Kumar and Anuj Saini under Section 390 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. 9. List after lower court record is received. (V.K.Bist, J.) (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 01.04.2011 01.04.2011 Arti