IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21032 of 2009 AWADHESH RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 06.08.2009 Heard both sides. Sole petitioner seeks bail in a case initially instituted under minor Sections of the Penal Code on the strength of a complaint lodged by the complainant. It is submitted that the court ultimately took cognizance under Section 395 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner referring to the complaint submits that because of possession over a particular piece of land the dispute had taken place. By filing the supplementary affidavit, the petitioner has brought on record the S.A. of the complainant on record as annexure-2. It is further contended that in her such statement on S.A. she has not named the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Sampat Kumar Judicial Magistrate, Chapra in connection with UT No. 50/09 arising out of Complaint Case no. 2580 of 2000. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)