IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. WRIT PETITION NO.2935 OF 2006 Balak Educatiion Society .. Petitioner v/s. The Municipal Commissioner, The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others .. Respondents Mr. V.B. Yadav for the petitioner. Ms. P.A. Purandare for the respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. K.R. Belosey, Officiating Government Pleader for the respondent No.3. CORAM : R.M. LODHA & SMT.NISHITA MHATRE , JJ. DATED : 11TH JANUARY, 2007 P.C. We heard the counsel for the petitioner. 2. The writ petition does not deserve to be admitted as it suffers from gross laches and inordinate delay. The petitioner seeks vacation and peaceful possession of the subject plot from the respondent Nos.1 and 2 through this court on the basis of the original allotment letter dated 12.11.1946. The writ petition has been filed on 6th November, 2006. Almost after 60 years, thus, the petitioner is seeking possession of the subject property pursuant to the allotment letter. Whatever be the dispute and the controversy going on in the form of litigation at the instance of the occupants, all that controversy came to an end by the order dated 19.2.1993passed by the Supreme Court of India. The petitioner did not pursue their remedy immediately thereafter and waited for almost 13 years. This negligent conduct of the petitioner disentitles it from invocation of the extraordinary jurisdiction. Writ petition is dismissed in limine. (R.M.LODHA, J.) (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.)