cran942.10 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 942 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant Versus Bhimrao Roopchand Nath ...Respondent ..... Mr. V.G. Shelke, A.P.P. for the applicant Mr. B.R. Kedar, advocate for the respondent-sole. ..... CORAM: S. S. SHINDE, J. DATED: 25th JANUARY, 2011 PER COURT:- 1 Heard. Upon perusal of papers made available, it appears that the basic case of the prosecution is that the accused respondent herein demanded Rs.2000/-, Rs.500/-, and Rs.10,000/- for not arresting the daughter of the complainant viz. Sunanda. Learned Judge after taking into consideration the evidence brought on record by the prosecution in para 37, held that on the day of meeting of the accused with PW 1 Jayawantabai no any crime/offence was registered against Sunanda. Therefore, there was no question of arresting cran942.10 -2- Sunanda by the concerned police Officer. It appears from the discussion in the impugned judgment that since the case was handled by the concerned Officer against husband of Sunanda the complainant has some grudge against the respondent Officer. When there is no offence registered against Sunanda, there was no question of arresting or releasing her. 2 In this view of the matter, this application seeking leave to file appeal is devoid of any merits and the same stands dismissed. Registration of appeal is refused. ( S. S. SHINDE. J.) rlj/