IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-29985 of 2009 Date of decision : November 18, 2009 Sudesh and another ....Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal Present : Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for Mr. JS Saneta, Advocate, for the petitioners Mr. Sidharth Sarup, AAG Haryana for respondent nos. 1 to 6 Mr. JS Dahiya, Advocate for respondent nos. 8 to 11 L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that respondent no. 7 had already died. Learned counsel for respondent nos. 8 to 11 states that respondent nos. 8 to 11 would not cause any physical harm to the petitioners. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the instant petition may be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. ( L.N. Mittal ) November 18, 2009 Judge 'dalbir'