HON'BLE SRI G.S.SINGHVI, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.BHAVANI PRASAD W.A.NO.146 OF 2006 Between: M/s. S.I. Steel Maker (P) Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director, SMA Abdullah, Plot No.A-21, IDA Nacharam. ..... Appellant AND Transmission Corporation of A.P. Ltd., (AP TRANCO) rep. by its Chief Managing Director, Vidyut Soudha, Khairatabad, Hyderabad and 4 others .....Respondents ::JUDGMENT:: Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri D.V.Nagarjunababu Counsel for Respondents : Sri V.Ajay Kumar Dated 13..2..2006 Per Sri G.S.Singhvi, CJ This appeal is directed against interlocutory order dated 10.1.2006 passed by the learned Single Judge in WPMP No.773 of 2006 in WP No.644 of 2006, whereby he restrained the respondents from disconnecting the supply of electricity to the appellant’s establishment subject to the condition of deposit of 50% of the disputed demand. After arguing the case for some time, learned counsel for the appellant made a request that his client may be permitted to withdraw the appeal with liberty to make a request to the learned Single Judge for early disposal of the writ petition. He further requests that the time specified in the order of the learned Single Judge for deposit of the amount may be extended by four weeks. Sri M.V.Ajay Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondents says that he does not have any objection if the time specified in the order under challenge is extended by a period of four weeks. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed with a direction that the appellant shall deposit 50% of the disputed demand within a period of four weeks from today. This would necessarily mean that if the appellant fails to deposit amount, then the respondent shall be free to disconnect the supply of electricity to its establishment. The appellant shall also be free to apply for early hearing of the main writ petition. G.S.SINGHVI, CJ Dt.13.2.2006 G.BHAVANI PRASAD,J