CWP No. 1030 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 1030 of 2010 Date of decision: 21.01.2010 Chandan Lal and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr. Shailendra Jain, Advocate for the petitioners. 1. To be referred to the reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M.KUMAR, J. The petitioners have approached this Court for issuance of direction to respondent No. 1 to decide the representation dated 13.11.2009 (P-18) in respect of land comprised in Khasra No. 1809 on the basis of Sehat Tatima (P-11). Learned counsel, while addressing arguments, has stated that the representation need to be supplemented by another supplementary representation. Notice of motion. Ms. Palika Monga, DAG, Haryana, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of State. Two copies of the paper book have been handed over to her by the learned counsel for the petitioners. Taking into account the nature of controversy raised, we are CWP No. 1030 of 2010 2 of the view that no written statement would be necessary and the ends of justice would be met by directing respondent No. 1 to take cognizance of the representation made on 13.11.2009 (P-18) and any further representation which may be sent by the petitioner within a period of two weeks from today. The same be decided in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. In the supplementary representation the petitioner is permitted to make a prayer for interim directions. This petition stands disposed of. (M.M.KUMAR) JUDGE 21.01.2010 (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) mk JUDGE