1 criapln3683-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3683 OF 2011 Abhijit Ashok Deshmukh .. APPLICANT Vs The State of Maha. ...RESPONDENT ... Smt.R.S.Kulkarni, Adv.for applicant. Shri G.R.Ingole,APP for R-State. ... CORAM : T.V.NALAWADE,J. DATE : 24/08/2011 ORAL ORDER: 1] This application is filed for anticipatory bail in Crime No.3/11 registered in Faizpur police station, Dist. Jalgaon, for offences punishable under Sections 406, 408, 409 & 420 of I.P.C. The previous application bearing No.2410/11, filed by the present applicant in this Court was rejected on 6/7/2011 on merits. 2] Advocate for the applicant argued for ad-interim anticipatory 2 criapln3683-11 bail. She submitted that after the order made by this Court, applicant deposited atleast Rs.3,80,000/- towards the amount due. Today a receipt dated 20/8/11 of the concerned society came to be produced, in which it is shown that amount of Rs.25000/- was deposited on 20/8/11 and at present, an amount of Rs. 5,30,361/- plus interest is due. Advocate submitted that the applicant is ready to deposit the remaining amount in instalments and he will deposit the amount within 3 months. It was submitted that the applicant is in service, probably in private company and he will lose opportunity of getting promotion due to this case. 3] While rejecting previous application, this Court has observed that custodial interrogation is necessary as there are allegations against Chairman, Directors and the Manger of the Society that they disbursed the loan amongst their relatives and friends even when no security in respect of the loan was given. In the present case, applicant had not given security and further the loan could not have been given to him as he was not residing within local limits over which the society had jurisdiction. Using this modus operandi, huge amount is misappropriated. In these circumstances, previous application came to be rejected. Crime came to be registered in the month of January 2011. It is already observed that in such cases, lenient view cannot be taken and such matters need to be dealt with sternly as such incidents are increasing day by day. The delay in arrest in such 3 criapln3683-11 cases affects investigation. In view of these circumstances, this Court holds that it is not fit case to grant ad-interim relief or final relief of anticipatory bail. So, application stands rejected. [T.V.NALAWADE,J.] umg/criapln3683-11