IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Appeal No. 2012 of 2001 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 20.07.2001 in Writ Petition No.18639 of 1993 on the file of the High Court.) Between: S. Venkata Rami Reddy ..... APPELLANT AND 1) Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Addl. Secretary, Women's Development, Child Welfare and Labour (Lab.I) Department, Hyderabad. 2) Labour Court, Anantapur, rep. by its Presiding Officer. 3) The Regional Manager, APSRTC, Cudapah. 4) The Divisional Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Kurnool. 5) The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Nandyal, Kurnool District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant:NONE APPEARED Counsel for Respondent No.1: GP FOR LABOUR Counsel for Respondent No.2: NONE APPEARED Counsel for Respondent Nos.3 to 5: SMT. W.V.S. RAJESWARI, SC FOR APSRTC The Court made the following : ORAL JUDGMENT: (per Shri Anil R. Dave, Hon’ble the Chief Justice) This appeal was notified for hearing on 20.8.2009. As the learned advocate for the appellant was absent, hearing was adjourned to 03.9.2009 under the caption “for dismissal”. On 03.9.2009, a request was made on behalf of the learned advocate for the appellant to adjourn the matter and, therefore, hearing was adjourned to 17.9.2009 i.e. today. Even today, the learned advocate for the appellant is absent. In the circumstances, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ September 17, 2009 C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J svs ........REGISTRAR To 1. 2.2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WA { }