BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Sixteenth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.14855 of 2011 1 MURUGARAJ 2 JEYAKODI 3 SATHESHKUMAR 4 N. GANESAN ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 TO 4 Vs STATE REP BY:: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VILAMPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL, CR NO. 185/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.SURESH KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR. C. RAMESH, ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused Nos. 1 to 4 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 447 and 379(NP) IPC of IPC in Crime No.185 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The learned Counsel for the petitioners would submit that due to civil dispute, the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and they have nothing to do with the alleged offence. He would also submit that they are also having permanent residence and therefore he would request for the grant of anticipatory bail. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the first petitioner along with the other accused came to the Covapuli tree between the de-facto complainant's land as well as the first petitioner's land and cut the tree and because of the same, there was a loss to the tune of Rs.5,000/. He would further submit that the investigation is pending and suitable conditions may be passed in the event of grant of anticipatory bail. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.Considering the rival submissions made on either side, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners on condition that if the petitioners deposit a sum of Rs.5,000/-(Rupees Five Thousand only) to the credit of Crime No.185 of 2011 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai, and on receipt of the same, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai, and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 5. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 16/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VILAMPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL 2 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI 3 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NILAKKOTTAI 4 DO THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL 1. CC to M/S. R.SURESH KUMAR Advocate SR.No.39812: DM::2011:NOVEMBER:18:: ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14855 of 2011 2P;6C:: Date :16/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/