IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16127 of 2010 KAUSALYA DEVI . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 02. 27.09.2010 Heard Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K.K. Sinha, learned counsel for the Bank. Learned counsel for the State submits that on perusal of the pension Payment Order as contained in Annexure-1, it would appear that the name of recipient for the family pension is one Mudia Devi whereas petitioner, Kausalya Devi claiming for family pension. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the above position is not correct. However, petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ application with liberty to approach the concerned department with respect to above discrepancy. The writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)