.[1]. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2813 OF 2004 Prakash Hirachand Dugad ...Petitioner. Versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. ...Respondents. .... None for the Petitioner. .... CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : JULY 05, 2006. JULY 05, 2006. JULY 05, 2006. P.C.: . It is the case of the petitioner that Respondent No.7 has carried out illegal construction and Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 have failed to take action. Considering the controversy, we direct Respondent No.3 or if he is not competent officer, the competent officer to examine the complaint made by the petitioner and after hearing the petitioner and Respondent No.7 to pass appropriate orders according to law. The entire action to be completed within 12 weeks from today. With the above observation petition stands disposed of. [F.I.REBELLO,J.] .[2]. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]