1 S.B.Cr.Misc. II Bail App. No. 6076/2007 (Praveen Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 12/12/2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. Rakesh Arora for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor. Mr. Suresh Kumbhat for the complainant. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State as also counsel appearing for the complainant. Perused the order impugned and statement of the witnesses including the statement of prosecutrix. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the prosecutrix was consenting party and she at her own went with the petitioner and toured various places in the country. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and having perused the statement of the prosecutrix and having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, without commenting on the merit of the case, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Praveen S/o Heeralal Balai be released on bail in FIR No. 248/2007 P.S. Arnod provided he 2 executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP