R.F.A. No. 750 of 2005 [ 1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.F.A. No. 750 of 2005 Date of decision: September 12, 2008 Bhim Singh .. Appellant v. State of Haryana and others .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Navneet Singh, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent. Rajesh Bindal J. The appellant is in appeal before this Court against the award dated 7.2.2005, passed by learned Additional District Judge, Gurgaon for enhancement of the compensation for the acquired land. Briefly, the facts are that land measuring 193.16 acres situated in the revenue estates of Village Wazirabad, Tehsil and District Gurgaon was acquired vide notification dated 5.5.1997 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, `the Act') for development and utilization of land as residential -cum- commercial and institutional area Sector 52, Gurgaon. The same was followed by notification under Section 6 of the Act on 4.5.1998. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short, `the Collector') gave award of Rs. 12,00,000/- per acre for chahi land; Rs. 9,60,000/- per acre for Allabarani; Rs. 8,40,000/- per acre for Bhood and Rs. 7,20,000/- per acre for Banjar and Gair Mumkin land. Aggrieved against the same, the land owner filed objections which were referred to the learned Additional District Judge, Gurgaon, who keeping in view the material placed on record by the parties, awarded Rs. 361/- per square yard, irrespective of the nature of land. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the claim made by the appellant in the present case is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in R.F.A. No. 2263 of 2004 – Mahipal and others v. R.F.A. No. 750 of 2005 [ 2] State of Haryana and others, decided on 26.4.2006. Learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute the fact stated by learned counsel for the appellant. For the detailed reasons recorded in Mahipal's case (supra), the present appeal is disposed of in the same terms. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 12.9.2008 mk