Crl. Rev. No.1352 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Rev. No.1352 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 19.7.2011 Geeta Devi and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Naveen S. Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioners. Rajan Gupta, J. (oral) In this revision petition preferred by the petitioners, order dated 27th May, 2011, passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Rewari has been impugned. Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that in a cross case, initiated at the instance of the petitioners, the High Court had stayed the proceedings and admitted the petition to regular hearing. He submits that the instant case cannot be decided by the court below independently and in view of that, an application was moved before the court below for stay of proceedings. However, the court declined to interfere. Hence, the instant revision petition. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and given careful thought to the facts of the case. A perusal of the order passed by the court below shows that the case titled as State Vs. Geeta and another pertains to the year 2006, in which entire evidence has already been led. The court below came to Crl. Rev. No.1352 of 2011 the conclusion that the case under Sections 376 & 511 IPC, proceedings of which are stayed by the High Court, cannot be termed to be a cross- case in relation to the instant case. It, thus, dismissed the application preferred by the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners has not been able to point out any illegality with the impugned order passed by the court below. I am, thus, of the considered view that there is no ground to interfere in the revisional jurisdiction of this court. The petition is without any merit and is hereby dismissed. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 19.7.2011 'rajpal'