IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 10TH DECEMBER 2010 / 19TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 1467 of 2010(S) ----------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.12023/2010 DATED 02/08/2010 .................... PETITIONERS: ---------------------- 1. BINDU P.C., AGED 35 YEARS, W/O.PETER THOMAS, SENIOR LECTURE, GOVT. COLLEGE OF NURSING, MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O., KOZHIKODE. 2. BINDU K.NAIR, AGED 36 YEARS, D/O.KRISHNAN NAIR, SENIOR LECTURE, GOVT. COLLEGE OF NURSING, MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O., KOZHIKODE. 3. RASSIAYA K.K., AGED 35 YEARS, W/O.ANIL S., SENIOR LECTURE, GOVT. COLLEGE OF NURSING, MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O., KOZHIKODE. 4. VIJAYASREE K.V., AGED 36 YEARS, W/O.GANESH V., SENIOR LECTURE, GOVT. COLLEGE OF NURSING, MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O., KOZHIKODE. 5. SREELATHA S., AGED 34 YEARS, D/O.SANKUNNI NAIR, SENIOR LECTURE, GOVT. COLLEGE OF NURSING, MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O., KOZHIKODE. 6. BABITHA, AGED 33 YEARS, D/O.MURALEEDHARAN, SENIOR LECTURE, GOVT. COLLEGE OF NURSING, MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O., KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.V.JAYAPRADEEP, SRI.SANEESH KUNJUKUNJU. Con.Case(C).No. 1467 of 2010(S) RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- SRI.MAOJI, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN, AGE NOT KNOWN, SECRETARY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.BASANT BALAJI. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------- C.O.(C). NO. 1467 OF 2010 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of December, 2010 JUDGMENT This C.O.(C) has been filed alleging willful disobedience to the directions in Annexure-A1 judgment dated 2.8.2010 in W.P.(C). No.12023/2010. When this matter was taken up today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that after the institution of this C.O.(C), the second respondent has passed an order after considering Ext.P8 representation referred to in the judgment dated 2.8.2010. After considering the claims of the petitioner, Ext.P8 representation was rejected. Taking note of the subsequent developments and also of the fact that the second respondent has complied with directions in judgment dated 2.8.2010, this C.O.(C) is closed. However, it will be open to the petitioner to challenge the order of rejection of Ext.P8 representation in appropriate proceedings. (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) spc W.P.(C) NO. 2 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. JUDGMENT September, 2010 W.P.(C) NO. 3