IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 14TH OCTOBER 2008 / 22ND ASWINA 1930 W.P(C).No. 27159 of 2008(G) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- SRI SAI VIDYA VIHAR, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER SMT. GEETHA MUKUNDAN. BY ADV. SRI.P.N. KRISHNANKUTTY ACHAN(SR.) RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, 2, COMMUNITY CENTRE, PREET VIHAR, NEW DELHI - 110 092, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SRI. A.J. VARGHESE ADV. SRI. DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, SC FOR R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 27159 OF 2008 (G) ==================== Dated this the 14th day of October, 2008 J U D G M E N T The challenge in this writ petition is against Ext.P11. 2. Ext.P11 has been passed in compliance with Ext.P9 judgment requiring the authorities to consider Ext.P1 request of the petitioner to issue an NOC for seeking affiliation from the CBSE. By Ext.P11, petitioner has been called upon to produce documents to prove that the middle section of the schools is recognised by the Education Department of the State or the syllabus of the middle class is approved by the Chairman, CBSE. This requirement is in compliance with the Government Order dated 12/1/88. 3. This issue in my view is covered by Ext.P12 judgment where this court has held that so long as the Government order governs the field, the applicant should comply with the prescriptions of the Government order. If that be so, the directions in Ext.P11 has to be upheld, particularly in view of the absence of any challenge to the prescriptions contained in the Government order referred to above. Since the issue is covered against the petitioner by Ext.P12 judgment rendered by a Division Bench of this court, the writ petition is only to be dismissed and I do so. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp