LPA No. 556 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. LPA No. 556 of 2011(O&M) Date of decision 16.11.2011 Jai Pal . Appellant Versus Presiding Officer and another .. Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present: Mr.Rakesh Gupta , Advocate for the appellant 1. To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 2. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? M.M.KUMAR,J. 1. The instant appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent is directed against judgement dated 30.8.2010 rendered by the learned Single Judge of this Court holding that the workman-appellant could not prove that termination of his services on 16.10.2000 suffer from any legal infirmity. Infact the workman-appellant had appeared as his own witness and tendered his affidavit. Thereafter he failed to offer himself for cross-examination. In the absence of any evidence adduced by the workman-appellant, the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Gurgaon reached the conclusion that there was no legal infirmity. The evidence produced by the management could also not show that there was any legal infirmity. The findings recorded by the Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court are un- exceptionable which have been correctly approved by the learned Single. 2. Having heard the learned counsel we are of the considered view that no room for interference is made out in the pure findings of fact. The LPA No. 556 of 2011 2 view taken by the learned Single Judge does not suffer from any defect warranting admission of the appeal. Dismissed. (M.M.Kumar) Judge (Rajiv Narain Raina) 16.11.2011 Judge okg