MK » J " Siv§3ion gamh a f” 166% PETITIONER V /:- Sudesh Kumar Lala, son of Late Shri Hori Lala Lala, aged about 46 years Resident of Tendudipa, Behind Railway West Cabin, Raigarh [C.G.]. VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Home Secretary, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur [C.G.]. ’22] The Superintendent of Police, Raigarh [C.G.]. {,3} The Station House Officer, City Kotwali, Police Station, Raigarh [C.G.]. ‘ 4] Sunil Kumar Yadav, S/o Shri Chhedi Lala Yadav, aged 32 years, Occupation — P.C.O. Shop Resident of: Railway Banglapara, Raigarh [C.G.]. 5] Sunish Trivedi S/o K.K. Trivedi, aged about 38 years, R/o Vikas Nagar, near Railway Power House, Kotra Road, Raigarh [C.G.]. X6] Deepak Jaiswal S/o Shri Mewa Lala Jaiswal, aged about 3O years, Occupation— Photocopy Shop, Resident of Behidn Ans Hotel, Dhimrapur Chowk, Raigarh, District Raigarh [C.G.} Anima Vibha ujur, W/o Shri Deepak Jaiswal, aged about 28 years, Resident of Behind Ans Hostel Dhimrapur Chowk, Raigarh, District w, Raigarh [CG] WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 225 OF T CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ’7'] 1] PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER:- As given above in the cause title PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS :— 2] IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIsGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION [HABEA% CORPUS] No. I73] /2oo7 , K HE 200 W m wewtziii FFL 3"?“ m (W) wwgggg mwm mwqugam ‘ D;V!S§ONBENCH: -2 Hon‘bze Mr. LC. Bhadoo & 1: Hnn‘ble Mr Dhirendra M%shra. JJ m 4 213a? ; Mr. Gautam Bhaduri; Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. UNS. Dec. Govt. Adv. ~ for respondents No.1 to 3. V ‘ i None for other 4 respondents. r Ms. Anita Lala present in t pereon atong with her oouneet Mrs. ‘ t Hamida Siddique. Advocate. : Ms. Anita Lara as identified r by Mrs. Hamida Siddrque, 6% ‘ Advocate. Even. Smt Dani Bat. Shri Sudesh Lala & Puehpa’ Lara, A mother. brother & elder sister 2 reepect§\/ely of Ms Anita Lela are present in court and they have aiso : identified her. ’ i Statement or” Anita Lala is ‘ recorded in open Court and the i same is piaoed on the record. As per her statement she i is residing in Raigarh on the given i addrese on her own tree—will and i ehe is not in confinement or i i detention ot‘ anybody. She has ' “‘ W... F8/246— 2/2007 5o,0ii0.‘ XI—HC-22 \4 i mam mm mm mmm WW§WW %31f‘?wsn%:T further stated that she wants to live at thaf place omly. So far? we are satisfied that Ms. Anita Leia is not in detention of anybody and being a major she understands her Weitare, therefore: She is left at her sweet wiii to go wherever she wants. Mr. ' Gautem Bhaduri submits that Anita Laia is underthe infiuence of respondent Ne.5— Sunish Trivedi. Prime—fade from the (1)tatement or” Anita Leia it appears that she is not under any intiuence. Even in the court the mother of Anita Laia tried to pereuade her to accompany her but she declined to accede her request. Therefore, we are not oonvtnoed with the submission made by Mrs Bhadurt; as Anita Laia is not in detention or intiuenoe of anyone. in view of the above, the petition stands disposed of. Certified con as erruies, sd/. Sd/4 L.C. Bhadoo Judge Wm Wm"..”nuunnnu.ai 200 . “unnumunnwnv n Dhirendra Mishra Judge k‘h‘e-“N‘N‘