!'ass;3; Si^^ ^7 AT Pettttoa 'Cj Mo. 1386 of; Ku. Usha Jaiswal, aged about 20, daughter of ghri Jagnai'ayan JaiswaJ, Resident of LIG 652,Tatibajldh, Raipur (C.G.j VBRSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through- Secretai-y, Department of Higlier Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CGI .c-/ Cl- The Vice University, Raipur (CGj Ravishaiikar The Director, State Educational Research and Training Institute, Shankar Nagar.Raipur (CQl The Principal, Mahatma Gandhi College, Station Road, Raipur (CG) Mrs. Ranjana Jaisv/al, Advocate fbr the petitioner. Mr. Vinay Harit, Dy. Advocate Generai with Mr. Ai-un Sao, Gov-t, Advocate for the State. Mr. Vinay Pandey, Advocate for respondent No.2/University. ORALO R D E •hra, U KAL. 5J KU u t< iPassed on 2.4.8008) 1. Heard. '. The question involved in this pet.it-ion is that the petitioner, who beiongs to Other Backwai'd Categories and resident of outside the State of Chhattisgarh, is pursuing her studies in B.Ed. course in the respondent No.4-Col!ege. She has been admitted in the said course after successtully participating in the common entrance exaniination a^nducted by the State Council for E-ducatlon Research and Training (for short 'SCERT^ thro'ugh Chhattisgarh Professional Exa.mination Board and she was allowed relaxation of 5% in t.he minimum marks required in the prequalification examination. However, the respondent.-Pt. Ravi Shankar Shukla University, Raipur (for short Vniversity') has refused to issue admission cai'd to the petitioner on the ground that her admission to the atove course by allowing relaxation of 5% is il'iegal. as the petitioner is resident of other State and therefore, she is not entitled for relaxation on the ground that she belone to other backwards classes category', as t.he same is available oniv to the ^BII..UJI-...L- 2 ^'(/\ candidates of the above ca.t.egories who are resident.s of the State ^- 3. I^earned counsel for the petitioner submit that. similar objection of respondent-University in Writ Petit.ion [c] No.7232/07 between Soni Rakhi Bek and others Vs. State of C.G. Ss ot.hers and other connected petitions has been deoided bv this Coiirt vide order dated 28.3.2008 and prayed that this petition may also be disposed in terms of the above orcier, This fact. has not. been disputed by learned counsel forthe respondents. 4. In \-;ew of the order dated 28.3,2008 passed in Writ Petition [c] No.723'2/07 bet.ween Soni Rakhi Bek and others VB. State of C.G. and othei-s, the instant petition is allowed and the order dated .17.10.2007 (Annexure P-7; passed by respondent-Pt. F'avi Shankar Shukla University, Raipur is hereby quashed and the respondent- Pt. Ravi Shankar 8hukla University, Raipur is directed to enro.Il the petitioner as student of B.Ed. courae in the coilege affiliated to it and issue her eligibility certificate for appeanne in the examination. No order as costs. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge <