IN THE HIGH COUR T OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41512 of 2008 Ganesh Mishra Versus State Of Bihar ----------- 02. 25.07.2011 This is an application for quashing the order dated 08.8.2008 passed by Sri Narsingh Prasad, Addl. Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.-VI, Sitamarhi in S. Tr. No.106 of 2000. By passing the impugned order the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No.-VI, Sitamarhi has closed prosecution witness finding non-production of any witness. Submission on behalf of the petitioner is that Sunita Devi was an important witness in this case could not appear rather was prevented to appear; so, liberty should be given for her examination. This order is passed on 08.8.2008 and case is not disposed of, impugned order goes to show that eight witnesses were there for prosecution, six of them were examined, two were to be examined, prosecution evidence closed, even it appears the complainant succeeded to keep the proceeding pending on the point of production of the witness; summons and bailable warrant was issued. Summons was served on Sunita Devi, even then she did not appear. Further another remedy was also available under section 311 of the Cr. P. C. that has also not been availed. Apparently it appears that prosecution is interested to linger the case, so finding no illegality to exercise power under section 482 of the Cr. P. C., this quashing application is dismissed. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)