........................L.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T....R. .... .PL60 .HM2 .FM2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY@@ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION@@ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA SECOND APPEAL No. 41 OF 2003@@ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Smt. Baidabai K. Ingale ... Appellant Vs. Motichand J. Mehta ...Respondent Mr. Rajesh Sawant, i/b P. S. Kale, Advocate for Appellant. Ms. Smita Mane, i/b Mr. P. B. Shah, Advocate for Respondent. CORAM : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.@@ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA DATE : JUNE 27, 2006.@@ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ................T........L......T.......T.......T.......T.......T...... J... P.C. .SP2 . Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the respondent. The learned counsel for respondent Ms. Smita Mane categorically states that parties have amicably settled the matter. In view of the aforesaid statement, nothing further survives in the appeal. Hence, appeal stands dismissed, however, no orders as to costs. [ Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]@@ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA