IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30449 of 2010 RAJESH RANJAN @ RAJAN @ RAJAN KUMAR @ RANJAN KUMAR YADAV, SON OF JAI MANGAL RAI. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 07.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 149, 148, 452, 342 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act and Sections ¾ of the Explosive Substance Act. It has been submitted that the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report and subsequently his named transpired in the statement of the co-accused for which he is in custody since 4.2.2010. Considering the same, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari, in Darpa P.S. Case No. 5 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other shall be the father of the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change 2 in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. It has been submitted that there is only one other case pending against the petitioner which fact will be verified by the Magistrate before releasing the petitioner on bail. The Magistrate shall also properly verify the papers of the petitioner as well as the bailors so that there is no confusion about identity later on. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)