IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR a5?) PETITIONERS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Deportment, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) /3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Deportment, Korba District Korba (C.G.) \ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE Rx \\VK\KR 9‘1 WRIT PETITION S No. 2010 Narmada Prasad Adile, son of Shri Bhagwat Prasad Adile, aged about 45 years, Upper Division Teacher, Government Middle School, Ghunchapur, Block Podi~Uproda District Korba (C.G.) Krishna Lal Lashe, son of Shri Amernath Lashe, aged about 41 years, Head Master, Government Primary School, Karra Block Podi~Uproda District Korba (C.G.) VERSUS \ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA \ x, HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETiTiON §S) No. 2058 9f 2010 PETiTiONER : Narmada Prasad Adile 8: anoiher. VERSUS BESPONDENTS : State of Chhai’tisgarh & Others. WRIT PETiTlON UNDER ARNCLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUWON OF ENDIA _SB: Hon’bie Shri Satish K. gggihoté’i, .3 Present: Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate appearing on beha§f of Shri Amit Kumar Shanna, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri NNRoy. P.L. forth‘e Siate/reaponderits. O§BER (ORAL) (Passed on 30‘r‘da‘y or Aprii‘ 20m) . By this peiiiion,‘ the petitioners seek a direction to the respondents to pay iwo advance incrememts on paseing of BIL examination. on their own expenses. before entering into service. 2. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioners eebmits that the issue invoived in the present case is no longer res fntegra as the same has been considered and decided by the Supreme Court in Aeha Saxena v. Stare oft/1P, e ors; i C)A Learned counsei further submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision'es atorestated, Thus, the petitioners may be permitted to make representations to the respondent authorities to decide their cases tor grant of two incremente in the tight of atorestated decision! subject to verification of the fact 0t possession of B.T.i. certificate on their own expenses before entering into service. 4. Learned counsei appearing for the Stateirespondente submits that in the event. the petitioners make representation, the same wiii be considered and decided, in accordance with [aw and in the iight of the decision ot' the Supreme Court in Ashe Saxena (supra) within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. in View oi foregoing, according to the iearned counsei appearing for the U1 petitioners. nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingiy, the writ petition isdisposed of. OJ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri i Judge ‘ 1 2009 {tin MPJR tsp) 59