1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5991 OF 2009 Ms.Enid Anna Haydan and Anr. .. Petitioners. Vs. Borjar Ardeshwar Mistry & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.Glenn A.Lobo for the petitioners. Coram: D.B. BHOSALE, J. Dated : 11TH AUGUST, 2009 P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. By this petition, the petitioners have impugned an order dated 13.11.2008 passed by the City Civil Courft at Dindoshi (Borivali Division), Mumbai, by which Chamber Summons No.34 of 2007 taken out by respondent no.1 for adding him as party defendant in the suit filed by the petitioners, has been allowed. I have perused the order so also an affidavit in support of the chamber summons and more particularly paragraph nos.2 to 5 thereof. In my opinion, respondent no.1 is necessary and proper party in the suit and hence no interference in exercise of extremely limited jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is called for. Hence the writ petition is dismissed. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)