IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR WPCriminal \\fc>^ /2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Yjay Reddy S/o Shn Parmanand Shrinivas Reddy Aged 38 years Resident of Street 36 Block 1A Sector 8, Bhilai TahsU 8s Disfarict Dui^ (CG). Presently residing at D/19, Sector -1 Devendra Nagar Raipur Tahsil and District Raipur (CG) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through SHO, Bhilainagar Distnct Durg CG J*Ktdici^} Ma^istAte Fh-st dass, Dui«(C<S) J^V^ '^- S.' Smt Rajshree Reddy alias Soiua Presently residing at Qtr No 1A Street 36Sector -8, BhUai Distt Durg (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ABTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITtmON OF INDIA FORISSUANCE OP A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION. CERTIORARI ETC. OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER v HIGH COURTOFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(Criminal) No. 1162/2011 PETITIONER AjayReddy Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh and another SB:- HOIT'BLE SHRI N.K. AGARWAL. J PRESENT?:- Shri Saleem Kazi, Advocate,for fhe appellant.. Shri G.D. Vaswani, Govt. Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDEI? (3-3-2011) 1. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitiQner submits that the petitioher had filed a complaint case agEdnst the respondent No. 2 Smt. Rajshree Reddy in the month of March, 2Q07 but for some reason or the other, leamed Judicial Magistrate First Class is not recording evidence and proceeding with the matter qnd therefore, if is necessary to direct the Judicial Magistrate First Class concemed to proceed with fhe case expeditiously. Learned Gbvernment Advocate has not opposed the above prayer. Considering the facts and circuinstances of the case and material on record, it is directed that the coneerned Magistrate shaU proceed with the matter and decide the same as early as possible preferably within a period ofsbc months from the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. The petition is accordingly disposed of. ^•^ 3udS®