1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 95 OF 2010 Suryakant Krushi Kendra ..APPLICANT -VERSUS- Kate Balasaheb Krushi Kendra and another ..RESPONDENTS Mr. K.C. Sant, Advocate holding for Mr. P.R. Adkine, Advocate for applicant. Mr. R.M. Deshmukh, Advocate for the respondent no.1. Mr. S.N. Nandedkar, A.P.P. for respondent no.2. CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATE : 11th October, 2010. PER COURT : 1. The parties are present before the Court and they have been identified by their respective Advocates. The parties have settled their dispute out of Court. The learned Advocate appearing for the respondent-complainant admitted, on instructions of his client, who is present before the Court that the amount of cheque is received by his client and his client does not want to prosecute the applicant-accused and he has no objection if the Revision is allowed and the applicant is acquitted. 2. In view of this, the Revision is allowed. The applicant stands acquitted of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, by setting aside the orders passed by the Lower Courts. (A.V. NIRGUDE) JUDGE gas/crira95.10