IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN TUESDAY, THE 31ST AUGUST 2010 / 9TH BHADRA 1932 RP.No. 363 of 2010(A) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.2109/2009 Dated 24/08/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -------------------------------- S. RABI, AGED 47 YEARS, ATTENDER, GOVERNMENT AYURVEDA DISPENSARY, NEDUMANGADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.THAMBAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, SCHEDULED TRIBE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF SCHEDULE TRIBE DEVELOPMENT, VIKASBHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DIRECTOR, INDIAN SYSTEM OF MEDICINE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER, DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICE, INDIAN SYSTEM OF MEDICINE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. PROJECT OFFICER, ITDP PROJECT OFFICE, IDINJAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ------------------------------- R.P.No.363 of 2010 in W.P.(C) No.2109 of 2009 ------------------------------- Dated this the 31st day of August, 2010 O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the review petitioner has filed I.A.No.444 of 2010 seeking permission to withdraw the review petition, reserving liberty with the review petitioner to challenge the judgment sought to be reviewed in appeal before the Division Bench. The review petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty with the review petitioner to challenge the judgment sought to be reviewed in other appropriate proceedings. P.N.RAVINDRAN, Judge. nj.