IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19767 of 2011 Hemant Yadav @ Hemant Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 3 29-07-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the state. Although petitioner is named in the first information report but admittedly, the victim was not taken away by the petitioner rather one, Ghantu took the victim from his house. Although learned Addl. Sessions Judge-IVth, Gaya has observed in his order dated 24.05.2011 that the informant has named the petitioner as assailant in her statement recorded under Section-164 of the Cr.P.C. but learned counsel for the petitioner produced the certified copy of the statement of informant recorded under section-164 of the Cr.P.C. and submitted that the informant has reiterated the same statement which has been stated by her in her fardbeyan and moreover, one co-accused, Babloo Kumar @ Raju Kumar has already been granted privilege of bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, the petitioner, namely, Hemant Yadav @ Hemant Kumar is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Civil lines P. S. Case No. 74 of 2011 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya. A.K.Vishwakarma/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)