IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No. 3427 of 2002 Between: 1 Y.Bhagiradharao S/o.Nagabhushanam M.P.Upper Primary School, Kovvuru, Kandukuru, Prakasam District. 2 V.Malyadri S/o. Malkondaiah M.P.Upper Primary School, Lingareddypalli, Kanigiri Mandal, Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Director, School of Distance Education, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to pass orders, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the condition that one should have studied B.Ed. in the Andhra University, in the Notification, dt. 23.1.2002 issued by the 2nd respondent is arbitrary, illegal, violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently strike-down the said condition and direct the 2nd respondent to allow the Petitioners for B.Ed. Training in Maths Methodology. Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr.KASAJAGANMOHAN REDDY Counsel for Respondents : Mr.P.B.VIJAY KUMAR The Court made the following : ORDER: The learned counsel for petitioners submits that by lapse of time, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition and it has become infructuous. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for petitioners, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J Date: 27.6.2005 DA To 1 The Secretary, State of Andhra Pradesh, Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Director, School of Distance Education, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 3 Two CD copies.