IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 7722 of 2009 Date of Decision: 21.01.2010 Rameshwar and others ..Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKUL MUDGAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present : Mr. S.K.Sud, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. B.S.Rana, Addl. A.G. Haryana for respondent No.1. Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3. Mr. Arun Walia, Advocate, for Haryana Pollution Control Board. ***** MUKUL MUDGAL, C.J. (Oral) With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing. Originally this writ petition contained two prayers (i) for issuing a mandamus directing respondents no.1 and 2 to take appropriate measures to stop air environmental pollution and (ii) to prove village Untala uninterrupted supply as is done in similarly cases of adjoining villages, namely, Khukhrana, Asan Kalan and Asan Khurd. CWP No. 7722 of 2009 [2] Today, learned counsel for Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. stated that in three villages in respect of which parity has been sought by the petitioners, supply is not uninterrupted but is on the urban mode owing to the acquisition of land of those villages for construction of Thermal Plant. Learned counsel very fairly conceded that even in respect of village Untala, some urban mode shall be adopted not later than 60 days from the date of this order. Learned counsel for the petitioners therefore states that in this view of the stand taken by UHBVN, no further grievance remains in the writ petition and the writ petition be disposed of as now having become infructuous. It is ordered accordingly. Writ petition stands disposed of. (MUKUL MUDGAL) CHIEF JUSTICE (JASBIR SINGH) JUDGE 21.01.2010 'ravinder'