BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Nineteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) Nos.15717 and 15728 of 2011 1. JOSEPH SAMRAJ 2. LILLY JOYCE : PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.2 & 3 IN BOTH THE PETITIONS Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, LAND GRAB CELL, TIRUNELVELI. (CRIME NOS.77 & 76 OF 2011) : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT IN BOTH THE PETITIONS For Petitioners : M/S. P.SANTHANAKRISHNAN Advocate IN BOTH THE PETITIONS For Respondent : Mr. C.RAMESH Additional Public Prosecutor IN BOTH THE PETITIONS PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who have been arrayed as A-2 and A-3 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 465, 467, 468 & 169 IPC in Crime Nos.76 and 77 of 2011 and seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that A-1 has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Crl.O.P(MD)No.15150 of 2011 by order dated 25.11.2011. 3. Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor on the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. In view of the granting of anticipatory bail to the main accused/A-1 by this Court in Crl.O.P(MD)No.15150 of 2011 by an order dated 25.11.2011, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli, on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) in each case, with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the first petitioner shall appear before the respondent police for a period of four weeks daily at 5.30 p.m. and thereafter he shall be available for interrogation as and when required and the second petitioner being a lady, she shall be available for interrogation as and when required. Sd/- 19/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.1, TIRUNELVELI. 2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, LAND GRAB CELL, TIRUNELVELI. +2 CCs to M/S. P.SANTHANAKRISHNAN Advocate SR.No.44405 & 44406 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15717 of 2011 Date :19/12/2011 NSV/21.12.11/2P/7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/