IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA No.2964 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:13.09.2011 Ved Parkash ....Appellant Versus Haryana State and others ....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Rakesh Nagpal, Advocate for Mr. V.K.Gupta, Advocate for the appellant. * * * RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL) The appellant/land-owner has impugned the award of the Reference Court on the ground that market value of the acquired land has been determined on the lower side. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has submitted before this Court that the instant appeal is covered by a judgment dated 04.04.2011 passed in RFA No.254 of 2008 (O&M) titled as Parveen Kumari Vs. State of Haryana and others and in view of the aforesaid judgment, this appeal is liable to be dismissed. Ordered accordingly. It may also be noticed that there is a delay of 58 days in filing this appeal. Since this appeal is being dismissed on merits, the application for condonation of delay does not survive. September 13, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) savita JUDGE