IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11858 of 2009 AJAY SINGH @ AJAY CHANDRA BANSHI S/O-Kallu Chandra Banshi, R/O-Vill-Pantit, P.S.-Kurtha, Distt.-Arwal. ………………………………………Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …………………………………………..Opposite Party. ----------- 3/ 29.07.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and learned Counsel for informant. The petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered against unknown for the offences under Sections 376/302/380/201 of the Indian Penal Code regarding killing of the informant’s daughter- in-law who was working as Shiksha Mitra. In course of investigation, the petitioner has been roped on the basis of identification of a ‘Sandal’ through snifer dog. Submission is that the petitioner is a man of fair antecedent. The identification by a snifer dog cannot be said a positive evidence unless there is some corroborative evidence. Learned Counsel for the informant 2 has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that the petitioner’s ‘Chappal’ has been identified by the dog. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/concerned court, Jehanabad in connection with Kurtha P.S. Case No.- 7 of 2009. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)