)^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION (0 N0. to^ / 2010 SINGl.E ^ PETITIONER Rai University, through the Associate Director, run and managed by the Indian Institute of Excellence Society, a society duly registered under the provisions of the Chhattisgarh Society Registration Act 1973 having its registered office at First Floor, Mishra Bhawan, Tatyapara, Raipur, Chhattisgarh RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. -^,..-' ^^y 2. c.yy~2 ^A." ^"" 3. ^~" ^" State of Chhattisgarh through the . Secretary, Department of Revenue and Rehabilitation, D.K.S. Bhawan Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Commissioner, Raipur, Chhattisgrah Commandant, P.L. Homes, Mana Camp, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4. r Collector, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5. Sub-Divisional Offlcer (Revenue), Arang-Abhanpur, District F:?aipur, Chhattisgarh •s1'11 6. Tahsildar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ^f a^^^ to PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^QRISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE AND SUITABLEWRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS L---.--.-. ^•"""^ ^^s^ II '«^3SI1 ^ fc PETITIQNER HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0.6331 OF 2010 Rai University RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Amrito Das, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyerforthe State. Shri Prateek Sharma, Advocate for the interverner. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 29th day of October, 2010) 1) Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2) The Competent Officer under the provisions of the Chhattisgarh Lok Parisar (Bedakhali) Adhiniyam, 1974 (for short "the Adhiniyam, 1974") by order dated 23-9-2010 (Annexure - P/18) directed the petitioner to handover the possession of the premises in dispute within three days. 3) Thereagainst, an appeal under the provisions of Section 9 of the Adhiniyam, 1974 was preferred before the Commissioner, Raipur Division, Raipur, wherein the Commissioner by order dated 28-9-2010 (Annexure - P/20) while admitting the appeal directed to maintain status quo and the next date of hearing was fixed for 19-10-2010. 4) According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, despite the status quo order granted by the Commissioner, the premises in dispute has been sealed and the petitioner institute is not in a position to run the educational institution. It is further informed that the next date of hearing is on 3-11-2010. 5) Having regard to the above-stated facts, it is not proper to interfere, at this stage, in this petition. However, since the date has been fixed ,r> Gowri bythe Commissioner for final hearing for 3-11-2010, it is directed that the endeavor should be made to finally dispose of the matter on the said date. If not possible, as early as possible preferably within a period of three weeks from today, in accordance with law and on its own merits. 6) Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that since the petitioner's instituteis using the premises through the adjacent door, no interference would be caused in running the institute till final disposal of the case by the Commissioner. 7) Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. However, it is made clear that if the adjacent door is dangerous and injurious to the students, it is directed to use the main door. 8) Certified copy today. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge