IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5576 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 24.09.2009 Ashwani Kumar .....Petitioner versus Daljit Singh Chopra and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Sarju Puri, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This order shall dispose of Civil Revision Nos.5576 to 5578 of 2009 as common questions of law and facts are involved in all these cases. For brevity, the facts are being extracted from Civil Revision No.5576 of 2009. The petitioner is a tenant in the demised premises situated in the area of Banga, Tehsil and District Nawanshahr, against whom an eviction petition under Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act') has been filed by the respondents claiming themselves to be `specified landlords'. C.R. No.5576 of 2009 (O&M) 2 The respondents moved an application for amendment of the eviction petition in order to incorporate Khasra No. of the subject property for its better identification as according to them, the khasra No. could not be mentioned in the eviction petition inadvertently. The petitioner-tenant appears to be under an apprehension that the Rent Controller has presumed as if the khasra number incorporated by amendment, pertains to the property in dispute only, i.e., as if the respondents are now not required to prove that the demised premises is located in the khasra no. in question only. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the considered view that the apprehension expressed by the petitioner is wholly misconceived and misplaced. Mere an observation in the impugned order does not absolve the respondents from the burden to establish connectivity between the khasra number and the demised property, even if the municipal numbers etc. are already on record. No interference in the impugned order is, therefore, called for by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. The revision petitions stand disposed of. Dasti. 24-09-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE