IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 8728 of 2008 Decided on: 9.12.2010 Param Dev …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. L.N. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 3. . None for respondents No. 4 and 5. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Petitioner has assailed the appointment of respondent No. 5 for the post of Gram Vidya Upasak. In view of the reply filed by the respondent/State, petitioner has secured 54.35 marks and respondent No. 5 has secured 56.75 marks. The suitability of the petitioner and respondent No. 5 has been gone into by the duly constituted Selection Committee. Consequently, the Court will not sit in appeal over the recommendations made by the Selection Committee. 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge December 9, 2010 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No (K. Attri)