{ 2# $_ * IN TIIE HIGH COURT QF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + w.P.(cRL) 467120rt soNIA @ SANIYA SALIM & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: None. VETSUS STATE & ORS ""'ResPondents Through:Vlr.HarshPrabhakar,Advocatefor Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel with ASI Mohd. Salim. Ms. APrajita, Advocate for Respondent No. 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER oh 16.08.20L1 By this petition the Petitioners have sought protection on the ground that they have married of their own free will contrary to the wishes of Respondent Nos. 4 to 7. The petitioners had appeared before this Court on the first date of .:2 hearing, that is, l't April, 2OIL Today neither they nor anybody on their J behalf has appeared before the court. An application was filed by Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 also to meet the Petitioner No. t however, notice could not be served on the Petitioners as they were not found residing at the address and matter was fixed for today' W.P.(CRL) 467/2011 Page I of 2 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified \*- Learned proxy counsel for the learned Standing Counsel placed on record the order dated 3'd June, 20II passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in a writ of habeas corpus filed by Respondent No. 4 wherein the Petitioner No. 1 appeared and stated that she had married Petitioner No. 2 of her own free will and she is major. Learned proxy counsel also informs that the Petitioners are not staying at the address given and thus the SHO could not provide them the security at that place. Since none is present on behalf of the Petitioners, it appears that they are not interested in prosecuting the present petition any further. Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. [y^Xf//-f(* ' MUKTA GUPTA, J. v AUGUST l6,20tl tvnt w.P.(cRL) 467/2011 Page 2 of 2