THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3999 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner filed O.S.No.168 of 2006 in the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Koilakuntla against the respondent, his paternal uncle, for the relief of perpetual injunction in respect of four items of the suit schedule property. He has also filed I.A.No.496 of 2006 under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. The trial Court allowed the I.A. through order, dated 04.01.2007. Aggrieved thereby, the respondent filed C.M.A.No.7 of 2008 in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda. The lower appellate Court partly allowed the C.M.A. on 08.03.2010 and vacated the injunction in respect of item Nos.1 and 2 of the suit schedule. This revision is filed against the orders passed by the lower appellate Court. Heard Sri Soma Konda Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri P.Veera Reddy, learned counsel for the respondent. It is no doubt true that the lower appellate Court had assigned certain reasons while sustaining the order of temporary injunction in respect of item Nos.3 and 4 and vacating it in respect of item Nos.1 and 2. The fact, however, remains that in respect of the very property mentioned in item Nos.1 and 2 of the present suit schedule, this Court passed an order of status quo in S.A.No.1133 of 2009. That Second Appeal pertains to litigation between K.Narayan Reddy, father of the petitioner on the one hand and daughters of the respondent herein on the other. When the parties are either same or claiming through same source of title, it becomes essential to ensure consistency. Hence, the civil revision petition is partly allowed modifying the order under C.M.A.No.7 of 2008 to the effect that status quo obtaining as on today shall be maintained by the parties in respect of item Nos.1 and 2 of the suit schedule. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:30.12.2010. kdl