1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Revision Application No.104 of 2010 (Ramsagar s/o Pundalik Pillewan v. Smt. Madhurabai wd/o Mukesh Pillewan/Pillewar – Now Smt. Jaya (Madhuri) w/o Ashok Rangari – and others) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri B.H. Sontakke, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri P.S. Sahare, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Smt. Smita Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Shri H.N. Verma, Advocate for Respondent No.5. Shri A.C. Wasnik, Advocate for Respondent Nos.6 to 9. Coram : R.K. Deshpande, J. Dated : 20 th April, 2011 In Succession Case No.10 of 2001 filed by the respondent No.1, the Trial Court has granted the succession certificate in favour of the respondent No.1. The operative part of the order is reproduced below : “1. Issue succession certificate in the name of applicant to receive the amount of Rs.20,000/- towards insurance policy No.970566943 lying with respondent no.1, Rs.31,000/- lying in S.B. Account no.7790 with respondent No.2, Rs.5400/- lying in recurring deposit Account No.192650, Rs.1400/- lying in Recurring Account No.195711, Rs.1600/- in Recurring Deposit 2 Account No.195801, Rs.600/- lying in Recurring Deposit Account No.195919, Rs.300 lying in Recurring Deposit Account No.196461, Rs.900/- in Recurring Deposit Account No.196590/- with respondent no.3, and Rs.1500/- lying in Account No.P/2/427 with the respondent No.4, total amount of Rs.62,700/-. 2. The applicant shall pay the necessary court fee.” This was the subject-matter of challenge in Regular Civil (Succession) Appeal No.46 of 2006 filed by the present applicant, who was the original respondent No.5A, claiming to be the brother of deceased Mukesh. This appeal has been dismissed by the Appellate Court holding that the applicant/objector has his own remedies available to him to claim the amount from the respondent No.1 on the basis of the provisions of Sections 8 and 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The respondent No.1 is the widow of deceased Mukesh and in that capacity, the Trial Court has granted the succession certificate, against which the appeal has been dismissed by the Appellate Court. In view of the aforesaid position, there is no error of jurisdiction brought to my notice. The civil revision application is, therefore, dismissed. It is, however, open for the applicant to adopt all such remedies available to him to claim a share in the debts and securities of the deceased. Judge pdl