:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1074 OF 2005 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1074 OF 2005 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1074 OF 2005 Shri. Ram Arjandas Rohra ...Petitioner V/s. Shri. Haresh Sewaram Kukreja & Ors. ...Respondents Shri. R.D. Suryawanshi for the Petitioner. Shri. R.Y. Mirza A.P.P. for the Respondent. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. DATED : JULY 04, 2005. DATED : JULY 04, 2005. DATED : JULY 04, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Shri. Suryawanshi for the Petitioner. The Applicant is a complainant in a private complaint filed against the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 under sections 323, 384, 506(2), 452, 342, 380 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. By the order impugned dated 29th March, 2005 the learned Magistrate directed that the complaint should be fixed for verification under section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on the next date. 2. In my view, there is no merit in the challenge to the order impugned. All that the learned Magistrate has done is that he has fixed the date for verification under section 200 of the said Code. There is no merit in the Petition. Hence, Petition is dismissed. All questions on merit are kept open. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE