IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-30993 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 13, 2011 Pritika Kumari and another ….Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Ramandeep Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Both the petitioners are present in person before this Court. I have examined personally both of them. Petitioner No.1 has stated that respondent Nos. 4 to 6 are residing in Delhi and have never visited Punjab, while petitioners are residing happily in District Ludhiana. Petitioner No.2 has stated that he has no apprehension from respondent Nos. 7 to 9. Since both the petitioners have no apprehension from the respondents and respondent Nos. 4 to 6 are residing in Delhi, I do not find any merit in the petition. Dismissed. October 13, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge