IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 471 of 2009 Date of decision: 27.03.2009. Gurmej Singh ....Petitioner Versus Harbans Singh ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. D.S.Pheruman, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. In a verdict of affirmation, both the Courts below (learned Trial Court and also the learned Ist Appellate Court) allowed ad- interim stay plea in favour of the plaintiff-respondent and against the defendant-petitioner. The plaintiff-respondent was held entitled to protection against forcible dispossession. In the course of the impugned order, the learned District Judge noticed that the plaintiff-respondent having inherited the tenancy right in the land in suit and mutation also having been sanctioned in his favour and that of his brother Mohinder Singh, their possession had to be protected till they are dispossessed therefrom in due course of law. This Court, as a Revisional Court, is not inclined to interfere with the exercise of discretion by the learned Trial Court as well as the learned Ist Appellate Court as there is no illegality and perversity in the course thereof. Dismissed in limine. March 27, 2009 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge