IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI THURSDAY, THE 22ND MAY 2008 / 1ST JYAISHTA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 503 of 2008(S) -------------------------------------------- ARISING OUT OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.A.NO.361/2007 Dated 16.3.2007 .................... PETITIONERS: -------------------- 1. BHANUMATHY, VIJAYABHAVANAM KARIMULACKAL, KOMALLOOR P.O. MAVELIKARA TALUK. 2. VASANTHI, KUZHIYATHU VEEDU PUTHUPALLYKUNNAM, CHARUMMOODU P.O. MAVELIKARA TALUK. 3. KUNJAMMA, KALLUKUZHIYIL VEEDU KARIMULACKAL, KOMALLOOR P.O. MAVELIKARA TALUK. 4. THANKAMMA, PUTHUKKATTUPADEETTATHIL KARIMULACKAL, KOMALLOOR P.O. MAVELIKARA TALUK. 5. GRACY, YESUSADANAM, KARIMULACKAL KOMALLOOR P.O., MAVELIKARA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.K.SASIKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. K.A.RATHISH, AGE AND SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MANAGING DIRECTOR KERALA STATE CASHEW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION P.B.NO.13, KOLLAM-1. 2. SALIM KUTTY, AGE AND SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MANAGER, FACTORY NO.24 KERALA STATE CASHEW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION KARIMULACKAL, MAVELIKARA TALUK. BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.C.UNNIKRISHNAN THIS CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & M.C.HARI RANI, J. ------------------------------------------ Cont. Case (C) No.503 of 2008 ------------------------------------------ Dated, this the 22nd day of May, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu, C.J. On instructions, learned counsel appearing for the contemners/respondents, submits that being aggrieved by the orders passed by this Court in W.A.No.361 of 2007 dated 16th March, 2007 the respondents have already filed a Special Leave Petition before the Honourable Supreme Court. 2. We do not doubt the correctness or otherwise of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondents. 3. In view of the pendency of the Special Leave Petition, it may not be appropriate for us at this stage to entertain this contempt petition. Accordingly the contempt petition is disposed of for the present as unnecessary. Liberty is reserved to the complainants to approach this Court immediately after the disposal of the Special Leave Petition said to have been filed by the respondents. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE (M.C.HARI RANI) JUDGE vns