6A0 £§§ THE HIQI mURT OF QIHATTISGARH JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR writ Petition &.Ibé3 [o4 J Ghanshyam Dewéngan. ,Son of Late shri Ramshwar Prasad Dewangan. Aged abcut 24 years. f Resident of Eamti Ward No.7 Dewanganpara, Kawardha (C.G. ) u VBr$ $ r. 1w: $tate of mhattisgarh. m Through Secretary, ‘ s.‘r. s.c. 5‘: 0.3.c. We1£are &\ \ . .£ RE$33QM3EE€TS V\ Developnient Department, D.K.S. Bhawan . Man tral aya . Raipn: . 2.” Commissioner , Schedule. Caste. Schedule Tribe (ather Hackward Class and Minority Development Departmaxt. Raimr ,‘ CG. 3a: District Organisor. Tribal Wa1§are Departmaat. District Kawardha. C.G. 4. Gellector . District Kawardha. C.Go WRIT FETITION UNDEE ARTICLE 226/2270? 'IHE mNSTiTUTION GF IWIA£ x 1' :& 1. PARTICULAR OF THE PETITIONER: As stated abov& in the canse title‘ cf the petition ; mntd. ..92 é w RESPGNDENT I ia Mmz e m W er Present :— Ms -rah ha vams, e p. r&‘& I; Eieisus giate of Chhatt'saaih «3: “her; {Writ petitian mder Articie ' A2; a? tne Cyrus.“ ‘ian 0§ Endiaf; Smaxe Bern“. Hen’b£e Smi $a‘tish K. Agnihotrt J. over Sm"; PK. Bhaumi, Fane§ Lawyer fer ihe $iaie. QPDrR GRAL‘; P&ss Gr, msb d ye?‘ Maxiea. bev,26l3§) Whh fhe consent cf §eameci cotmseé aspaai'iaig fm the $3: des, ihe pefi‘iierx is i1eard fmaiiy. Late 5W Qameshwa? Prasad Bewangan: whiie workmu as Coek §n the Deparimew o? Trha? Deveiapmérat and pestw at Hag'ijan Karya ué‘a‘m‘vas KaWad‘h, daexj s1 *1ameas 0“ 2044?”. The pet§i§oner daiming himseEf to b$ tha Gewndants r of tne deceased empbyee made ar. appiécation far grant cf apgcmtmeni en ccmpa3sionaie baa h L8 8 2L: 'a'he case at” éhe pewenaf was considered and by ieiéef daied 4-? @209'? {Amemre —z wig z: was :eccmmended by the Beet?» Cam.“ eerer, 1r; Weé‘fere for consideratien e? ‘ihe caee of the ecmwea te aeeomi on Ew— posi 0f Ass‘zstan% Gracie -— Hi. as encomwe *0 ihe E) a Comm§es§oma .heye yes a peel: veeaet, mereeyrer. 0e 'i-‘3-‘0e‘2 {Amexwe — PM} the Eésmcx :ganisef. ef§§ce ef me bea§ cier Kewamjha! s‘n fespenee it: me “emf da‘t a ii m-xgm e§ the Depu’r; Semmissie er, “aba' W~ feave, in‘fermee i‘nai there was m3 vacan”: post and apeeémmem ma cempeesiemie ’eaeks eem‘m be graded to .he pe'i‘denea". 5e re "aggrieved ‘13; the eehad eat'zzm e‘ "me ¥esgwemiem a“’%‘mi s, the peézimner are erreé i?e piesem Wit 5e ser be?3“ mus bow en 6~4-7C<'34 seewmg drec‘gw ‘e t’ae resuonderx‘é- am, 0:: es h epeom? ihe petitione’ m ihe Gael e? A8515 H’: ede ‘: i on wrwassaon e basis. Dunng pereemg e? this eekétienz en E 2%6 ‘ihe ‘Binéyie? Graaniser T'Ibaé W’ewwe Kawa: ‘aa we meeeni 'm iee Gee??? 1 «a ; D( $ 127 and SLmmitéed ’kha? éhere was a vacamy e’f Shiksha Karm§. Acccrdii‘agiy, by srdea ad 44- - 065 mmexure — W1? the 'peim‘anei' was appemhed 0n €he pas S kana :(ama G'Hda - H cw ammmw .0! a be ed 6f ihree years. .vis Farah Mmhaz, ieamed ceunse§ aweamg fer ihe Ntaiscr: would submit thai m5 vac m cf Ass; an: Gmde m is avaiiafsie k1 ‘ a reswndeni Deparmen. c Q‘fic” ”m3 sm‘ sorreci in previdimg ihe inferma‘iimi befwe W3 Saar: an 5-?-25";GS ghai oniy pas? 'of Shiksha Karmé was vacant. Even Gr: ihai éaie, past of Assistant Graeie Fl was vanam; therefare‘ ‘ihe mswndew‘i- qutf‘amles n‘av a3e dimmed i9 cmswcr me casé sf the p I mne; for aiopcinimeai an the pest c§ Asszsiam Graue m. I nm'e reard leumcd ceLmsei aaweanrh. f the pafiies, {Jerused the weadmgs and we docamems appended thereéo. it is weli sewed pfincipie cf iaw iha‘k awaintmem m commssianate gfcu?‘$ is rot a wemad a? recrmi‘rcm. um :3 a faciiiiy to prowde .0? immedaate {ehemh‘iaiioa a? the ¥ami§y in distress for reiievmg the depe‘radent fam§§y mem‘sez‘s of ‘ihe deceased empioyee §rom deetii'u‘iéon. m oihea’ wog'c‘is, the ebjeci cf comgassiomt awe: “meat h: enabie eenurieus ‘amiiy “£0 tide over ihe sudden anemia? crisis arrd is noi io pr vide emproymem. 8} in Haryaria State Eéeciricrry Eoard em: enotrrer v3 are; Singrf‘ the $upreme Court oere their me wmie (n; ct of any ear .eqssxmde aopomroent schemes rs Lo gwe succor to tr“ farrw to trde ov r r§‘e sudaew fieaocrar cr§e§s befe§en éhe dependen‘is on ascou‘n‘t of rhe urriimery demise of ire sore earning members.“ 9} S+are of Niampur vs. wad. Rajaeeéafihe- eme o r: after saving heard various cases on compassionate apeoirrémeer, observed as under : We? I?‘ SW? Sh$¥ma geSai?‘ culu O "'. bmor‘ of ind“ “nd we Kwgg (4‘: SCV 468; o was obaerved thef m aL ciarms of aepearament on eomeassroaeie grwms t re‘shouéd no? be an, derey m ape wimem. Tne purpose of wovrdmg appointmenrs 0" enmgaeerorraie g md Is i“ mmgaie me karwmp due te éea‘kr‘ of oe eread=eamer arr :r‘e ,emAV. ' $uw “if; ym 1h Jews W as r AIR 2am s '30 § Lg. apvo§r€meais shouid. ‘kheyefcre. be previcied 5mmediately to {edeam me §amiiy in disstress. We faét tha‘é the wam wa$ a mmor at ihe time 9f tieath of his fa‘iher is no gmund. uniess the $.c'heme itseif anvigage SpecificaHy otharwise, éa‘siate thm as am when such mmcr becames a maicr he can be aagointed without anv time tensmoumess a! §imit The abcve v§ew was r$i%e:‘aied in Phoaiwaii (Smi) V. Union a? Znciia and m3. (1991 Supp {2) §C$ 538} and Unmn sf im’ia and ms. ah Bh‘agwam Sing?! {1QQ5 (Q 3&3 4576?. in Dimeéoz cf Eduaation {$acandarf} gland Am. v. §3ushpendm Kumar /\/‘ and Grs. {‘i9§8 {5) SCC WE) ii was observed that in matter of compa5s§oaaie appoiratment tiwra cannai be msistéme far a pariisulay pas-t. Gui; 0"? §ure§v humamtarian aonsideraiion and havéng regard €o ihe faci ma! amass same saume cf iiveii’nwij §s mwideé {ha famiiy wouid not be abie ta) make both ends maei, mav§si0m awa made fix g§ving appcimmem i9 one of the dependam’s of the deceased who may be elig§ble for apmintment. Care has, hewever, “i0 be ‘éaken ihai prevision for grouswd ef cempassionate empioyment which §5 in the ria'iure 0f an exaegiior; wto ihe generai Drovisiohe does m": und‘uév inteafere wi‘ih the eght sf thoee ether eersens who are e§§g§bie fer aggointmeni i0 seek ameénimem againe‘i fihe peat which wouéd have beea ayaiiabEe, bu: fer the prewsien enaeiing appsmimeni being made en cemnassmna‘te areunds of he «ciependent of the deceased emp§oyee As it ie in 'the a‘aature of exceptéen te i'he geeerai previsiens §t cemet substitute the pmvision to which ii is am exceeiien ersd theyeby maiiia'y ihe mam eyevieioe bv taking away cemeieteiy ihe {gm cenferred by the main prcvésEen." , W} The Supfeme Sourt in $§a€e cf J & K ami e‘ihers "V’s. $ajad Ahmee MM, in para ”:1 has heid ae uneer: “11 it §s ihat sue‘n an appeémment ks an exceptien ta the genera} mée‘ NomeEy‘ an emple‘yment r: ihe Gwemmem‘ or ether eubiic secters ehould be eeen ta an eEégibie eandidaies who ear: come femiard ‘te aepiy am .cempiete with each othey. §t is in ceneeneece with Art§eie 14 of the Ceneiitutmn. Qn the baeis of campeéii‘ive marks. en ‘eg oinkment ehogid not be deemed ffem eitcept whem eempeking circumsianees demeed, sash as, Lieath 0f the sole Bread wimaer.‘ €he family survived am“; the family suffering heceuee of Eee setback. Grace 3’: ie waved té‘aat inspite cf me dea‘m cf ihe breadwinner. the famiw survived and whstantiai period §s (aver, there is m naces$§ty is say “goodb I9” to the nam‘aai rme cf apmintment arad t0 Show favour i0 ane at the cost cf the int&arasts sf severai cthers‘ §gnm§ng the maradate 0f Amcée $4 of the Comtituiion.” 1’1) in View of the above we“ sewed wincibles 5f iaw, appiying ‘to i'rae facis of the case on hand, the pe€i€ioner §s not entitied ‘te any reéief on ihe basis that the oosi of Assistant Grade iii és 5w! avaiiabie because as per the circular dated ‘1i’3-6-2Gf33 {Aenexwe — u oniv W96 vacano§es can be ‘fmed on éhe basis 0f compassioneie A/ground whereas in the pfesent case it cames beyom‘ 18% of vacancies. Thefe i3 no mem in Ms pet§iien The peiitiefz is accordingiy d§smissed. Ne cider asie costs. (4 x‘ Sd/— Satish K. Agm'houi Judge \X Gowri