1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Writ Petition No.684 of 2008 (Mrs. Shweta Deshmukh v. State of Maharashtra and others) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ms Preeti Rane, Advocate (Appointed) for Petitioner. Shri T.A. Mirza, APP for R- 1, 2 and 4. Shri K.H. Deshpande, Senior Advocate for R- 3. CORAM : A.H. Joshi & R.C. Chavan, JJ. DATE : 29th January, 2009 1. In pursuance of the directions given by this Court, respondent No.3 has filed an affidavit dated 19-1-2009, which is at pages 8 and 9 of the paper book. 2. A commitment has been made in the affidavit, which reads as under : “That respondent No.3 has constituted Internal Complaints Committee as per guidelines given in Vishakha's case by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India.” 3. The petitioner, who is present in Court, is satisfied with this statement. All that she wants is that she needs reasonable time to submit a compilation of complaints to the Committee regarding her grievances. 2 4. The learned Senior Advocate for respondent No.3 states that no sooner the respondent receives the compilation from the petitioner, the complaint would be expeditiously enquired into on the basis of the guidelines laid down in Vishakha's case. 5. In view of what we have noted above, the petition is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE pdl