IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 29TH MAY 2009 / 8TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 14787 of 2009(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ VIJAYAN, S/O. THADATHIL RAMAN, AGED 65 YEARS, PERAMANGALAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JIJO PAUL RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, THRISSUR. 2. RAVUNNI, S/O. THADATHIL RAMAN, PERAMANGALAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SECRETARY, KAIPARAMBU GRAMA PANCHAYAT, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C).14787 of 2009 --------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of May, 2009 JUDGMENT A conditional order was passed by the 1st respondent as per Ext.P1 requiring the petitioner to stop the alleged unauthorised drawing of water from two bore wells in his property. In response to Ext.P1, the petitioner appeared before the 1st respondent and submitted his objections as per Ext.P2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the delay in disposal of the Miscellaneous Case and hence this writ petition. 2. I heard learned Government Pleader also. It is appropriate that there is a finality of the proceedings initiated under Ext.P1. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to pass final orders in the Miscellaneous Case, after conducting necessary enquiry. Such enquiry shall be completed within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this W.P.(C).14787 of 2009 :: 2 :: judgment. The petitioner as also the complainant before the Sub Divisional Magistrate shall be heard before such orders are passed. Sd/- (V.GIRI) Judge sk/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge