SINGLE BENCH Y-- C ^r c, <a-^> IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S) No. {i0^^ /2009 PETITIONERS ^^ < q.< ^ Buddhdev Piperiya, S/o Late Shri Asharam Piperiya, aged about 40 years, Working as Assistant Teacher, Primary School, Khurshidih, Tahsil & District Durg (C.G.) Singh Dewangan, S/o Shri Semu Ram Dewangan, aged about 38 years, Working as Assistant Teacher, Primary School Borasi, Block Durg, R/o Dundiya, Post- Arjunda, Tahsil Gunderdehi, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 3. Moradhwaj Chandrakar, S/o Shri Pyare Lal Chandrakar, aged about 42 years, Working as Assistant Teacher (Primary School Borasi, Block Durg, R/o Village Daukidiha, Post Matwari, Tahsil Gunderdehi, Thana, Anda, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 4. Dhaneshwar Singh Dhruwe, S/o Shri Latkhor Ram ^ 2- Dhruwe, aged about 38 years, Working as Head Master, Pronnat Primary School Ravelidih, R/o Village & Post Thauoud, Tahsil & Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS /' 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - Secretary Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer, ^ Distt. Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA f—78 ^n^i ^r k^icb •^sn ^I^T ^rt^ '3'sr T^l'41d^, ^xll-yjl<o, t®l<rliylj>< ^1*1^11 <CbN!e§l .Lsjr.£.C<?..^....<A.crr^ f200^ 3^T XWF (^qt^^r) ^iT^^Rft^ 31T^T ^FifeNt^ 'Rl^ff ^ ft^ if^^K ^ stf^r ^T^T SB : ttONTI 03.08.2009 :l*)3^:l;I11t^liWy»y?t)<111^:^^»^W:i5}: Shri Somkant Verma, couns| Shri Shashank Thakur, P.L. At the oufset, counsel for th^ petitioner submits that he wants to withdraw this petition with liberjty to make a representation to the authority concemed. He also se^ authority for deciding the represen] date as according to him case of with the order passed in W.P. (S) N<| State counsel submits that statement before this Court whethl makes a representation to the e shall be decided strictly in with the order passed in aforemeijitioned writ petition. However, he submits that if the petitioner concemed respondenty the sox^ accordance with law. Accordingly^ the petition is liberty as aforesaid. If the petitiort eoncemed respondent within a pei|iod of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the sai|ie is expected to be decided within a further period of frwo months froir It is made clear that this < merits of the case and the authoritiles concemed are free to decide the representation of the petitioner stri d for the petitioner. For the State. ks a direction to the ccncemed bation of the petitioner at an early the petitioner is squarely covered >.6257/2008. it this stage he can not make any sr case of the petitioner is covered dismissed as withdrawn with the er makes a representation to the the date of its receipt. ?ourt has not commented on the ^tly in accordance with law. Sd/- pritinker Diwaker judge + ^'^