THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3521 OF 2009 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Though served, none appears for the respondent. The petitioner-judgment debtor filed this revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 {CPC}, seeking to assail the order dated 11.06.2009 in E.P.No.4 of 2008 in O.S.No.200 of 2003 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Repalle, Guntur District, in allowing the E.P. filed under Order XXI Rules 37 and 38 CPC. The grievance of the petitioner is that the Court below ordered arrest and detainment of the petitioner in Civil Prison for realization of the decree amount, in case of failure to pay the balance of decree amount on or before 31.07.2009. On considering the submissions made by the petitioner and on perusal of the material available on record, it is seen that there is no dispute to the finding on fact as arrived at by the Court below after regular enquiry, where both the sides had sufficient opportunity. However, having regard to the fact that in spite of the petitioner having sufficient means to discharge the liability, he is avoiding the payment, I do not find any warrant to interfere with the order of the Court below. Hence, there are no merits in the revision. However, having regard to the fact that this Court has granted conditional stay on deposit of half of the E.P. amount, as per the order dated 31.07.2009 in CRPMP.No.4869 of 2009, the petitioner is permitted to deposit the entire amount under the E.P. within a period of three {3} months from today. On such deposit, the respondent is permitted to withdraw the same, without furnishing any security. Subject to the above, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) 26th February 2010 RRB