^ / ^ \ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR [C.G.1 / PETITIONER W.P.-1.^^SA)4 ^ : P.L.Shrivastava S/o Late K.L.Shrivastava retired Forest Ranger, Aged-About 68 yrs., R/o-Qtr.No.82, Mahesh nagar, Rajnadgaon^Tahsil&District-Rajnadgaon [C.G.]. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : .-•'"^ .^^y^ ^y .••••• \^" ^ .^•" ^^ l.StateOfChhattisgarh Through- Secretary Forest department DKS Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. State OfMadhya Pradesh Through- Secretary Forest department Vallabh Bhavan, Bhopal (M.P.) p.Forest Conservator j Chhindvada Circle Tah & Distt.- Chhindvada, (M.P.) 4.Van Mandaladhikari (Forest Zonal Officer, west Chhindvada, (General) Tah & Distt.- Chhindvada, (M.P.) 5.The state Administrative Tribunal Through- Secretary, Raipur, Distt.- Raipur [C.G.] WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22^/227QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA «w^:,.^^.,A^,,..^s.— XI-HC-22 3?T^T^T r<r1l5b 3:nt^T 5t?+iich ^f^a ^TST ^j^icrl^ ^Tll^^Ko, fsRTO^r ^i^r t^w ^^.^....{?...^.G:..1..^&..., w^rr^nrw^ '""""" "^^""^ 200^ 'I^^T' -sn^r wn^R'^rf^r 10.5.2004 Shri Sejijay Patel, couns< Akhil Agi'awal, Paiiel La^ Application for urgent h< Lcanicd couuscl for the matter is simUai' to W.P.No.2c State ofC.G. ond others) whe 19.9.2003. Copy of the so\ Leai'ned counsel prays for sim IIcard. 41 for the petitioner, ^tyer for the State. ^aring is allowed. petitioner subinitfcd that the 119/2003 (Dr.Saiijay Tiwai-i -v- ^e orders have been passed on |d order tias been produced. |lm' order^ in this petition also. By this writ peUtion Constitution of India, petitio: applicatioii No.279/2002 Administrative Tribiinal, Bem The petitioner?s case is as Forest Raiiger in Chindav attaiiiing the age of supera allegation agaiust thc petitio: period, he had embezzled coininitted tlnancial irregular| charge stieet. After conducl passed reeovery order on 11.' ^application before thc 8| CM<4l<rt^l'i 'WT^tf ^ f^T^' <H»1^t< "^ 'STf^PTW^T L<iider Ai'ticles 226/227 of the ler seeks to withdraw original med before the State h at Raipiir. bhat the petitioner was working ida Circle and he retired after abnuati&n on 31.7.1994. The icr is that during the relevant |the goveiiuiient miiount aiid des aiid as such he was ser^ed ing enqulry, respondent no.2 .2001. The petitioner moved aii fcate Adm.inistrative Tribunal [Tft^ ^f<a^ XI-HC-22 3?n^i^T f^w'sn^r ^RW^rfin ^ \D '3^? ^ii^id^ '^Tftwi^, fN^irey 3^?T ^^K u ^i^di •g^q^-——••*—••—•**•'•'*"•"—^p^ 200 'I^^T' \^) 'STT^T'^HW^rf^T -z- challenging the order dated 1| which was registered as 0,A<N(j Leanied comisel for the pj the State Administrative Tribuii application of thc petitioncr Tribunal, the petitioner waiits <1 He turther subinitted that the ^ except to me thls wrlt petlti^ a.pplica.tion pendixig before the Leamed Govt. Advocate of the petitioner. In the circuinstances, th^ i.e., O.A.279/2002 is allowed t^ is d^jft|^^ as withdmwn. Accordingly, the petition ^ C.C. as per rules. ^x^. <=M<4i<n<flri '^^ ^ feT^t <p5i^i< ^? -srf^m^n^i 11.7.2001 of respondent no.2, t.279/2002 letltioner submitted that since |ial has been abolished and the is still pcnding beforc the |o withdmw O.A.No.279/2002. j^etitioner has no other reinedy ^n in order to wlthdraw tlie Tribuiial. h^s no objection to the request i^ application of the petitioner ^) be willidrawii aiid Uie saiue (tands diaposed of. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [^^a^ ^ >