IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 19TH JUNE 2008 / 29TH JYAISHTA 1930 RP.No. 41 of 2008(V) ---------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.36303/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/RESPONDENT IN WPC -------------------------------------------------------------- C.RADHAKRISHNAN, S/O.CHELLAPPAN PILLAI, AGED 52 YEARS, RESIDING AT "RADHA BHAVAN", (KRISHNA PRABHA), NEAR E.S.I. DISPENSARY, THAZHOTHU BHAGOM, PUNALUR POST. BY ADV. SRI.N.UNNIKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS/ PETITIONER IN WPC ----------------------------------------------------- M/S. GOPIKRISHNA REAL ESTATE PRIVATE LTD., REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, ADV.G.C.KANNAN, GOPIKRISHNA, THALICODU, PUNALUR. BY ADV. SRI.M.R.ANANDAKUTTAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.KRISHNAN, J. -------------------------- R.P. No. 41 OF 2008 IN W.P.(C) No. 36303 OF 2007 --------------------- Dated this the 19th day of June, 2008 ORDER Heard the counsel for both sides. I have perused the judgment passed by me. What I have stated is how the parties have to move when a person is aggrieved of Commissioner’s plan and report. I had disposed of the writ petition only with a direction that if any party is aggrieved it will not preclude that party from moving an application as directed in my judgment. I do not find any error apparent on the face of the record, which requires consideration. Therefore, the Review Petition is dismissed. M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE vps