IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1341 OF 2007 Bhagatraj Gurmukhdas Ahuja .. Petitioner Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Bhagatraj Ahuja petitioner in person present. Ms.P.P.Shinde, A.P.P for the State. Mr.A.Y.Sakhare, Sr.Counsel with Mr.Vinod Mahadik for Respondent Nos.1 to 6. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. : A.S.OKA, J. : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 28th July 2008. P.C.: . Heard petitioner in person. The challenge by the petitioner in person in this petition under Article 226 and Article 227 of the Constitution of India is to the order dated 13th June 2007 passed by the learned Magistrate by which private complaint filed by the petitioner has been dismissed. The party in person submits that he has also invoked section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. He submits that though a remedy of revision under section 397 of the said Code of 1973 is available, this Court can always entertain a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and an application under section 482 of the said Code of 1973. He states that even this Court can : 2 : exercise power under section 226 of the Constitution of India. 2. In view of the decision of this Court in the case of V.K.Jain & others Vs. Pratap Padode & Anr. (2005 (3) Mh.L.J. 778) this petition is not entertained with liberty to the petitioner to file revision application before the appropriate Sessions Court. 3. Accordingly, petition is disposed of by keeping the remedy of the petitioner open to file a revision application. 4. If revision application is filed by the petitioner, the concerned Sessions Court is bound to take notice of the fact that this writ petition was filed in this Court on 19th July 2007 and the same remained pending in this Court till today. All contentions of merits are expressly kept open. (A.S.Oka,J)