IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3065 of 2008 PHOOLA DEVI & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 6.5.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, who happen to be mother-in-law and Bhaisur of deceased Urmila Devi , apprehend their arrest in connection with Tekari P.S.Case No.70 of 2007 registered under Sections 498A,304B, 201/34 I.P.C. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. It was sought to pointed out that information of death of Urmila Devi was transmitted to her Naihar and just after knowing the same the informant and his family members immediately made an application stating therein that accused persons are innocent and the informant ( mother-in-law of the husband) and witness Murari Paswan being Mama of the deceased have filed affidavit to the extent that the deceased Urmila Devi was leading her life happily in her Sasural and never had any occasion to raise any complaint against her in-laws. The petitioners are named in the F.I.R. and whatever the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioners on their behalf is their defence. In view of the offences, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Their prayer for anticipatory bail is, accordingly, rejected. ( Abhijit Sinha, J ) NKS/-