IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.5144 OF 2004 Narayan Sk.Pilley ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... Mr.Thomas Jacob for Applicant. Mr.D.R.More, A.P.P. for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. NOVEMBER 29, 2004. NOVEMBER 29, 2004. NOVEMBER 29, 2004. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. Perused the record. 2. I see no reason to depart from the opinion expressed by the Court below in rejecting the Bail Application preferred by the present Applicant. The Applicant has been named by the prosecutrix. The medical evidence also supports the case of the prosecution. For the reasons recorded in Paras 5 : 2 : to 8 in the order of the Court below, with which, I am in agreement, not a case for bail. Hence, rejected. 3. The Principal Judge of the Sessions Court, Mumbai is, however, directed to assign the case to Fast Track Court to ensure early disposal of the trial. Ordered accordingly. 4. The Applicant shall co-operate the Trial Court for early disposal of the case. If the Trial Court is of the opinion that the Applicant is creating any obstacle in the early disposal of the case, that fact be recorded in the Roznama. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.