IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 24 OF 2007 SHRI. DILKUSH F. DESSAI ... Petitioner Versus QUEPEM MUNICIPAL COUNCIL REPRESENTED BY CHIEF OFFICER ... Respondent Mr. S. R. Vernekar,Advocate for the applicant. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 20th February, 2008 P.C. Heard Shri S. R. Vernekar, learned Counsel on behalf of the applicant. The challenge in this petition is to the order dated 5.3.2007. It appears that there was decree passed against the petitioner for the recovery of the possession of block No.1 and payment of compensation of Rs.500/- per month. The possession of the said block No.1 was already handed over on 26.9.2002 and what was being executed, was the payment of compensation @ Rs.500/- per month, as per the decree dated. 31.8.1996. The contention raised by the learned Counsel on behalf of the petitioner is that there is special provision under the Municipalities Act,1968 to recover the said compensation. The compensation sought to be recovered, was not being recovered under the provisions of the said Act, but under the decree dated 31.8.1996 and in the light of that the order of the trial Court cannot be faulted. The petition is dismissed in limine. N. A. BRITTO, J. SMA