. C v J" ‘ is: ’ V I_N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARHI g WP. (s1 No. t! Li 9’5“ 12008 “é .rr WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226,0}? THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA .... PETITIONER ’ES. Rao, S/o. Late ER. Rao, aged about Vh 48 years, working as Draftman, R/o. \A MKQ‘“ Opposite Development ‘ Commission, éq/éS 7 ‘ " ,v" u" r - . Ralpur, Dlstt. Ralpur (C.G.) . . ~ Q$Vw¢¥°3 ‘ ’ w o VERSUS Q‘g §..... " ¢%"" , RESPONDENTS: f1) State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretary, Panchayat 81, Rural " 9&0? \5$ Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan G$§$ - \\ a? g “a Raipur (C.G.). NV , Cy" . o (2) Additional Secretary, Panchayat 82, Rural Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) (3), Chief Engineer, Rural Engineering Service, Office Development Commissioner, Raipur (C.G.) Executive Engineer, Rural Engineering Service, R‘aipur (C.G.) HQGH COURT OF CHH£§TH$GH AT QSLASPUR (Hon. Ma". Justice Pritimaar D§wa§<er) Writ Pemian (3) No. 4455 of 209$ EETETIGNER E3. Rae VERSUS RESPONDENTS Staie 0f Chhattisgarh and others. Shri Vinod Deshmukh counsei for the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur Dy. AG for the respondents/State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTtON OF INDIA v 0 R D E R (08.012009) finatly. With the consent 0f the counsel for the parties, the matter is heard ’ Chaltenge in the instant petition is to the order dated 30.6.2008 (Annexure P-2) passed by respondent No.1 whereby the petitioner was transferred from RES Raipur to RES Biiaspur,‘ in vioiation of the transfer poiicy. This petition was filed on 11.8.2008 and the stay was granted in favour of the petitioner vide order dated 13.8.2008. Contention of the counsel for the parties is that this Court may quash the impugned transfer order by giving liberty to the respondents to pass fresh order if administrative exigency so warrants. tn View of the submissions of the counsel for the respective parties and iooking to the fact that the petition was filed on 11.8.2008 and stay was granted in favour of the petitioner vide order dated 13.8.2008, the impugned order dated 30.6.2008 so far as it relates to the petitioner is hereby quashed. However. the respondents shall be free to pass the order afresh if administrative extgency necessitates the same. With the aforesaid observation,tWW? f 7 , . Sd/- x i Pritinker Diwaker i Judge