CWP No. 3346 of 2002 -1- In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh C.M. No. 16888 of 2011 in CWP No. 3346 of 2002 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.12.2011 Sadhu Singh ....... Petitioner Versus The District Judge, (Exercising the powers of Tribunal under the Improvement Trust Act), Rupnagar & others ........ Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.M. Kumar Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Narain Raina **** Present : None for the applicant- petitioner. Mr. Suvir Sehgal, Addl. A.G., Punjab. **** 1. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? M.M. Kumar, J. This is an application for deciding the matter in terms of the decision rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 2718 of 2002. It is appropriate to mention that when the petition was admitted for hearing the admitting Bench specifically ordered that the instant petition be heard along with CWP No. 2718 of 2002. Notice of the application. Mr. Suvir Sehgal, Addl. A.G., Punjab, who is present in the Court, accepts notice. A copy of the paper book has been handed over to him. CWP No. 3346 of 2002 -2- After studying the matter Mr. Suvir Sehgal, Addl. A.G., Punjab states that the matter is squarely covered by the judgment dated 26.11.2011 rendered in CWP No. 2718 of 2002 and, therefore, the instant petition be also disposed of in terms of the directions issued on 26.11.2011 in CWP No. 2718 of 2002. Mr. Suvir Sehgal, Addl. A.G., Punjab has also made another request by stating that in the order dated 26.11.2011 passed in CWP No. 2718 of 2002 instead of incorporating his name, the name of Addl. A.G., Haryana has been added, which is a typographical mistake. In view of the above, the application is allowed. The writ petition No. 3346 of 2001 is disposed of in terms of judgment dated 26.11.2011 rendered in CWP No. 2718 of 2002. The office is also directed to correct the mistake in marking the presence of the Addl. A.G. and Mr. Suvir Sehgal, Addl. A.G., Punjab should be marked present rectifying the mistake. Certified copy of the rectified order shall also be issued to the parties. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (RAJIV NARAIN RAINA) JUDGE 16.12.2011 'sp'