gagga mach ‘HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH A ILASPU . P. s.nNo.‘2.?~§ OF 00 w % 29 G S Ahlrwar S/o Late Brln rwar dawar Ah1 age aout 49 ears As31stant Grd 2 Z11 ntyawasayl Sam1t1 Ralarh ot ttarmua Aadarsh Nagar Ralarh Tah 8 1stt. S v PONDENT tae o att1sgarh through Secretar oc1al Welfare Development Deartment avan Ralpur (C G anal Dlecto hhatlgar ntyawasayi ,Sahkari Vitt Awarrg 'Vika‘ ws aipur (C.G 3 Clltor d i yaayi" oec an Presdent Zila Antwas aarl 1as Sam1t1 Maryadlt Rarar 1stt Ralgarh (C G ) fiicer a aharl lkas Sam1t1 Mara 1st. ararh (C.. 4 xecutlv ntyawasay Ee , Al Sk V ydlt Shk Vk gh /D O Zil Rah lgar Dt Rg G). ETIT NDER . ARTICLE 22 ONSTITUTION OF INDI “ . IN THE T _ ‘ BR PETIiioNER I d b y ae a A g R/o Chhe Ad g 5 D Jashpur (C.G.). /VERUS 1K RESS St f Chh y, S p / D K S Bh ) Mgng rr, Cth Rajya A s / Ne R .) l PION U 6 C A OF " THE“ "+.. @ XI—HC—78 mmjmcsmw) m 20° a mm (ma) mmm mm#wm wmm aiaimm mmm I SB: Hon.Mr.Justice Pritin 29.06.2009: Shri Manoj Sinha couns Ifor the petitioner. Shri Arvind Dubey PL fo the respondents/State. Grievance of the petiti ner is that vide order dated 30.6.2008 passed by the M naging Director, :Chhattisgarh Rajya Antyawasayi ‘Sahkari the petitioner was transferi However, the said order has not been complied with. tt Awang Vikas Nigam, Raipur ’ed, from Raigarh to Korea. As per the petition on 5.7 .2008 the petitioner has made a representation to the Collector/President Jila ;Antyawasayi Samiti, Raigarh. In the said re :resentation a'note is said to be put by the Collector for doing the needful by the Competent ‘ Authority. ii Contention of the petitic ner Is that despite the transfer l i a ,- ‘ l order and the direction of the Collector, the petitioner has not ’ been relieved. 4/, " l i‘ ln the given facts and :ircumstances of the case, the petitioner wants to make a fresh representation to respondent A. .w ...W~~ =.,.. ..... I mmfm‘aa mmm No.3. He also seeks a di deciding the representation si Accordingly, the respo period of three weeks from t With the observations petition is disposed of. rection to respondent No.3 for a made by him, expeditiously. ident No.3 is directed to decide the representation, if any, ade by the petitioner within a h date of its receipt. and directions as above, the Sdl- ,xPritinker DiwakerT’ Judge