IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 25TH JANUARY 2010 / 5TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 2375 of 2010(V) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SONY KURIAN, CHIRAYIL PUTHEN VEEDU, MENONPARAMBU ROAD, CHUTTUPADUKARA P.O., EDAPPALLY, COCHIN-24. BY ADV. SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J. SMT.POOJA SURENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CORPORATION OF COCHIN, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-11. 2. THE SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF COCHIN, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-11. 3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, OFFICE OF THE CORPORATION OF COCHIN, EDAPPALLY REGION, EDAPPALLY. 4. K.PREM NATH, 'CHAITHANYA', CHELAKKULAM LANE, MENONPARAMBU ROAD, EDAPPALLY, COCHIN-24. BY SC SRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................... W.P.(C).2375/2010 ....................... Dated this the 25th day of January, 2010 JUDGMENT 1. Petitioner submits that he was issued Ext.P1 building permit for the construction of a residential building. According to the petitioner, the 4th respondent made a complaint against him before the 2nd respondent, and that thereupon 3rd respondent issued Ext.P2 notice. It is stated that on receipt of Ext.P2, petitioner filed Ext.P3 reply. But however, orders have not been passed pursuant to Ext.P2 taking into account Ext.P3, as a result of which Completion Certificate is not issued, and therefore, he is not in a position to avail of the electricity connection. It is in these circumstances the writ petition is filed. 2. I heard the learned counsel appearing on either side. 3. In my view, the grievance of the petitioner can be redressed, if the 3rd respondent passes orders on Ext.P2 duly adverting to Ext.P3 reply given by the petitioner. W.P.(C).2375/10 2 4. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of directing the 3rd respondent to pass final orders on Ext.P2 notice, considering Ext.P3 reply filed by the petitioner and with notice to him and the 4th respondent. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with the copy of the writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs