IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 332 OF 2006. PETITION NO. 332 OF 2006. PETITION NO. 332 OF 2006. Ms.Ibel Varghese. ... Petitioner. V/s. State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents. K.M.John for the petitioner. M.A.Phal, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 and 2. P.M.Pradhan for respondent Nos.6 to 11. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. V.C.DAGA, J. V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 1st March 2006. 1st March 2006. 1st March 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. No case is made out to interfere with the impugned order. The view taken by the revisional authority is a reasonable and possible view. 3. The last contention raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner that revision itself is not maintainable is devoid of any substance in view of law laid down by the Apex Court in Everest Apartments Co-op. Hsg. Society Ltd. v. The State of Maharashtra, 1966 Mh.L.J. 643. 4. The petition is, thus, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, (V.C.DAGA, (V.C.DAGA, J.) J.) J.)