IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 10414 of 2006 Between: Toddy Cooperative Society, Yeldurthi Toddy Group, Yeldurthi Village and Mandal, Medak District rep., by its President N.Siva Goud. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Prohibition and excise, Medak District at Medak. 2 The Inspector of Prohibition & Excise, medak Circle at Medak District. .RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.SAI RAM GOUD Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned proceedings vide C.R.NO.C1/36/2005-06 dated 25-04-2006 to cancel toddy group of the petitioner Society i.e., Toddy Cooperative Society, Shop No.1 to 3 and Deport, Yeldurthi Village and Mandal, Medak District, pending receipt of the second sample bottle report as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the first respondent to send the second sample bottle to the independent lap named by the petitioner society forthwith.” At the hearing, Sri B.Sairam Goud, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 15th June, 2009 vrn