IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 2653 OF 1998. NO. 2653 OF 1998. NO. 2653 OF 1998. Mrs.Ishwari C.Thakkar Adult, Indian Inhabitant, residing at 18, Milap Apts., 5th floor, S.V.Road, Malad (West), Mumbai 400 054. ... Plaintiff. Versus. 1. M/s.Leaduing Edge Systems Ltd. an incorporated company under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office at 27, SDF-1, SEEPZ, Andheri East, Mumbai. 2. M/s.Mafatlal Consultancy Services (I) Ltd. an incorporated company having its office at Jukaso House, Jukaso Silk Mills Compound, Behind Orkay Silk Mills, Andheri Kurla Road, Sakinaka, Mumbai 400 072. 3. Nalluri Chandrasekharan Murthy, Adult, Indian Inhabitant, C/o. Vijay Growth Financial Services Ltd., 6-3-552/2C, Flat No.302, 3rd floor, Classic Court Apartment, Eramanzil, Somajiguda, Hyderabad 500 082. ... Defendants. Ms.J.P.Kar for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 10th July, 2007. : 10th July, 2007. : 10th July, 2007. JUDGMENT.: JUDGMENT.: JUDGMENT.: 1. Heard the Counsel appearing for the Plaintiff. The Defendants have not filed written statement. 2. After having perused the averments made in the : 2 : 2 : 2 : plaint, I find that this is a fit case for invoking sub-rule (2) of rule 5 of Order VIII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for passing a decree in favour of the Plaintiff on the basis of averments made in the plaint. 3. Accordingly the suit is decreed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (f). Certified copy is expedited. Judge. Judge. Judge.