LPA No. 29 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. LPA No. 29 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision 16 .3.2011 Daya Ram ... Appellant Versus The Haryana Urban Development Authority and others ... Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.S. MANN Present: Mr.John Kumar,Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the appellant 1. To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 2. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? M.M.KUMAR, J. The instant appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent is directed against the judgement dated 3.8.2010 rendered by the learned Single Judge holding that the petitioner had failed to place on record any document to show that he was appointed as Fitter and that he had qualification of matriculation with certificate from ITI in order to succeed for grant of higher pay scale of Rs. 950-1500 instead of Rs. 750-940. The higher scale of pay is permissible only if the appellant is matriculate with certificate from ITI. The services of the petitioner were regularised on the post of Fitter (Helper). Therefore, it has been held that he is not entitled to the pay scale of Rs. 950-1500 which is admissible only to those who had qualification of matriculation with certificate from ITI. There is no legal infirmity in the view taken by the learned Single Judge. Dismissed. (M.M.Kumar) Judge (T.P.S. Mann) 16.3.2011 Judge okg