IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 7TH JULY 2008 / 16TH ASHADHA 1930 Bail Appl..No. 4325 of 2008() -------------------------------- CRIME NO. 169/2008 of ERUMAPETTY POLICE STATION .................... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED --------------------------- 1. K.K.MOHAMMED, AGED 27 YEARS S/O. IBRAHIM ,KARAPPAMVEEDU, KIRALUR DESOM VELUR VILLAGE, TALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DT 2. K.I.MAHIN, AGED 26 YEARS S/O. IBRAHIM, KARAPPAMVEEDU, KIRALUR DESOM VELUR VILLAGE, TALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DT BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR RESPONDENTS/STATE & COMPLAINANT: --------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE ERUMEPETTY POLICE STATION THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI. K.S. SIVAKUMAR, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ======================= Bail Application No. 4325 of 2008 ======================= Dated this the 7th day of July, 2008. O R D E R Petitioners who are the accused in Crime No.169 of 2008 of Erumapetty Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 452, 323 and 354 r/w Section 34 IPC seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application. 3. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. There is no reason why the petitioners should not surrender before the Magistrate having jurisdiction and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioners surrender before the Magistrate concerned and file an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of preferably on the same date on which it is filed. This application is disposed of as above. Dated this the 7th day of July, 2008. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. rv