SBCivil Writ Petition No.2492/2005 (Sanjay Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.) Date of Order :: 5th October, 2006 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. Rameshwar Hedau, for the petitioner. Mr. Shyam Ladrecha, Addl.Govt.Advocate. .... Counsel for the parties are in agreement that the controversy involved in this petition for writ stands decided by this Court in the case of Dayalal and 6 ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors., reported in 2003(3) WLC (Raj.) 599. I have also examined the record of the case and also gone through the judgment of this Court in the case of Dayalal (supra). I am satisfied that the controversy involved in this petition for writ stands decided in the case referred above. Accordingly, this petition for writ is allowed. The petitioner is declared entitled for getting the salary at par with salary which is given to other cooks/chowkidars in the hostels run by Social Welfare Department of State Government. The entitlement will be from the date of filing this petition for writ i.e. 12.4.2005. The State Government shall consider candidature of the petitioner for the purpose of regularisation of his service in accordance with the scheme directed to be framed by this Court in the case of Dayalal (supra). No order to cost. ( GOVIND MATHUR ),J. kkm/ps.