IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.4194 of 2009 1. Shyam Kishore Singh S/O Late Kali Singh R/O House No. L-1/40, Sri Krishnapuri, P.S. Sri Krishnapuri, Distt.- Patna ........Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. K. Senthil Kumar, the Patna Municipal Corporation through its Commissioner Maurya Lok Complex, Block C, 2nd Floor, Dak Bunglow Road, P.S. Kotwali, Distt.- Patna 3. P.K. Singh, the Chief Accounts Officer Patna Municipal Corporation / Patna Regional Development Authority (Dissolve), Maurya Lok Complex, Block-C, 2nd Floor, Dak Bunglow Road, P.S. Kotwali, Distt.- Patna 4. A. Amanullah, the State Of Bihar through the Commissioner cum Secretary Urban Development and Housing Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna ......Opposite Parties ----------- 8 29-06-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the Patna Municipal Corporation and learned counsel for the State. There is no dispute that the monetary benefits and the lawful dues indicated by the writ court have been worked out and given to the petitioner. It also appears from show cause filed today that the particular relief granted to the writ petitioner that the authorities may take a final decision in the matter of medical claim has also been considered and decided in favour of the petitioner resulting into payment of Rs. 98,414/- by a cheque issued on 10-5-2011. The petitioner is not satisfied and according to him the calculations are not correct and he is entitled to more money. 2 In the facts of the case, this court is not persuaded to proceed further with the contempt application because, prima facie, the order of the writ court has been complied with. This contempt application is, therefore, finally disposed of. It goes without saying that if petitioner wants to pursue some other monetary claims, he would be at liberty to do so through appropriate proceeding in accordance with law. BKS/- (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)