SjBgIt Bi IN THE mOH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPOR WRIT FETITION (Sj_5_fos_/2006 pffri'noNER tn .-'s^>" ^; f' ..»;.-' .<<'' .vf' /.y ^// /^sl5/' ^y /\.^?y - VERSUS SAMJAY SCTGH 'mASSSK /" S/o Late Shri Bhojraj Singh Thakur, Aged about 19 years, Resident Of Sanjay Nagar Kanker, District Kanker (C.Cr.) ^^ I. 2. .-^mr;'^^ ^yViju;^- STATE OF CmiATT^38ARH Tfcrougfa Chief secretary D.K. S. Bhawan Mantralaya, Raipur. MANA6I»GDIRECTOK ' Chfaatti%arh Ksgya. Lai^au Vanopeg Vyapaa- evm ^Vlkas Sahfeari Sao^i Marayadit, Raipur (C.G.j MANAGIKG DIRE^TOR' CUM-DIVI8IONAL reiREST OPPICER, Jila Van-Upaj Sahkari Sangh Marayadit Kanker, Distt. Kanker. (C.G.) WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OP A SUITABLE WRTT, ORDERS ORDIRECT10N. tEcewro'COF! ^B&^'UR ct,ewKt^ft-_u^-;o & 3. •t 1 { u Y^»ff^ ^ALVIVA * ...^'^^: ./?? .- Tr^T-,; liGK COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BSLASPUR WRIT PETiTiON iS) N0. 5408 OF 20s 1TIQNER lS3iS ^ESPONDENT Sanjav Singh Thakur ysrsus State of Chhattissarh & Others *.-. s (Writ petmon under Articie 226/227 of the Constltution of india) Singie Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satlsh K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Prakash Tiwari, counsei.for the petitioner. Shi-i Alok Bakshi, Govt. Advocate for the State. Shri Manish Sharma, counsei for the respondents No.2 & 3. i! ^ £~_ Gowi (Passed on this 23'° day of September, 2009) WISh ths consent of iearned counse! appearing for the partiss, the petition is heard fina!!y. At the very outset, iearned counsei appearing for ihe respondents No.2 & 3 submits that the case of the petinoner cannot be considered in absence of an appiication for consideraiion of his case on compassionate basis. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that in the event the Detitioner does not want to contest the matter on merits, however, the petitioner may be permitted make an application for appropriaie relief before the respondents No.2 & 3 and they may be dlrected to consider ihe appiicaiion of the petitioner, in accordance wlth iaw, as expedmousiy as possibie. In view of foregoing, ths writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid iiberty. However, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the respondents No.2 & 3 are directsd to consider the application of the petitioner for grsnt of compassionate aDDointnient, in accordance with iaw and on its ov/n merits, as expeditiously as possibie preferably wsthin a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt ofihe appiication. Sd/'- Satish KAgnihotr Judge I-