IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.2560 of 2011 Date of Decision : February 11, 2011. Mohan Singh .....Petitioner versus Punjab Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. & another ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.G.P.S.Bal, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Aggrieved by the order dated 15th December, 2009 (Annexure P-7) passed by the Managing Director of respondent No.1-Corporation, the petitioner has filed a departmental appeal on 13.1.2010 (Annexure P-8) followed by reminders but the appeal is still stated to be pending consideration. It appears that the petitioner has also represented the respondent-Corporation for release of the arrears as per the Government Policy but his claim has not been considered so far. The aggrieved petitioner has accordingly approached this Court. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and keeping in view the fact that his appeal has yet not been decided, I deem it appropriate C.W.P.No .2560 of 2011 2 to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to put up the appeal of the petitioner before the Appellate Authority who in turn is directed to decide the same after giving an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. The Managing Director/Competent Authority of the respondent-Corporation is directed to consider and dispose of the representation dated 25.11.2010 (Annexure P-9) also within the aforementioned period. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. February 11, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE