IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41154 of 2010 1. MD. SHAH ALAM @ SHAH ALAM 2. Faiyaz Alam Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Originally allegation was leveled for the offence under Sections 447, 341, 323, 307, 436 of the I.P.C. and ¾ of the S.C./S.T. (prevention of atrocities), Act. After death of the victim, offence under Section 304A of the I.P.C. is added. Petitioners were allowed bail even by the Police Official but in the year 2003, cognizance is taken for the offence under Sections 447, 341, 303, 303, 436/34 of the I.P.C. and ¾ of the S.C./S.T. (prevention of atrocities), Act . One of the accused persons namely Prawez Alam faced trial but acquitted by the learned First Additional Sessions Judge, Katihar in Sessions Trial No. 14 of 2002. Above circumstance was favouring petitioners but they did not avail the same rather prefer to come in quashing which also is withdrawn in the year 2005 and thereafter remaining away from the trial alone disentitles him for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioners is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)