: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPILCATION NO.65 OF 2004 CIVIL APPILCATION NO.65 OF 2004 CIVIL APPILCATION NO.65 OF 2004 IN IN IN SUO MOTO CONTEMPT PETITION NO.32 OF 2001 SUO MOTO CONTEMPT PETITION NO.32 OF 2001 SUO MOTO CONTEMPT PETITION NO.32 OF 2001 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.4801 OF 2000 WRIT PETITION NO.4801 OF 2000 WRIT PETITION NO.4801 OF 2000 High Court on its Own Motion ).. Appellant Versus Bhavana Uday Acharya and another ).. Respondents And Krishnakant Keshavrao Lad and another ).. Applicants/ Intervenors Mr.Sanjay Sawant with Mr.Karan Mehta for the Applicants. Mr.Nitin Pradhan for the Respondents. CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR AND CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR AND CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR AND SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DATED: 2ND FEBRUARY 2005 DATED: 2ND FEBRUARY 2005 DATED: 2ND FEBRUARY 2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . This Civil Application is filed by the Applicants seeking intervention in Suo Moto Contempt Petition No.32 of 2001 initiated by order dated 22nd December 2000. Proceedings for contempt are pending. As ordered on that day, the interim order operating in the main Writ Petition was vacated and the Competent Authority was directed to take possession of the second Respondent Mill forthwith. Vacation of the interim order and giving free : 2 : hand to the Competent Authority under the Act is enough protection of any person who claims to be interested in the proceedings under the Act. No person, whatever be the interest, can have any say in the proceedings initiated suo moto for contempt by this Court. Hence, application for intervention rejected. 2. Place the Contempt Petition for hearing in the last week of February 2005.