IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 1074 of 2008 DATE:11.02.2008 Between: B. Bhuloka Raju ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Station House Officer, Kancharapalem Police Station, Visakhapatnam, and another. ...RESPONDENTS ORAL ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice A. Gopal Reddy) The petition, dated 29.12.2007, sent by the petitioner addressed to the Hon’ble Chair Person, A.P. State Human Rights Commission and others and also to the Hon’ble the Chief Justice, received by the Registry on 21.01.2008, alleging that his grandmother, namely, Boddu Yellayyamma, W/o. Late Ramana, aged about 75 years, R/o. Door No.40-50-6, Santhosh Nagar, Thatichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam, has been illegally detained by the Kancharapalem police from 28.12.2007 and apprehending danger to her life, is taken up as a writ petition. In response to the notice, the Sub-Inspector of Police, Kancharapalem Police Station, the first respondent herein, filed counter affidavit along with the statement of the alleged detenue recorded on 2.02.2008, by the Mandal Executive Magistrate, Visakhapatnam whereunder the alleged detenue deposed that she along with her grandson, who is the petitioner herein, were residing at Santoshnagar, Thatichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam. On 8.01.2008 the police arrested the petitioner and released him on bail on 22.1.2008. She was also taken to the police station by the Kancharapalem police on one evening and let off in the night and she was never illegally detained by the police. Admittedly, the petitioner is an accused in Crime No.792 of 2007 registered for the offences under Sections 498-A, 354 and 376 r/w 109, 114 IPC of Visakhapatnam Police Station. In connection with the said crime, the petitioner and his grandmother were brought to the police station, enquired into with regard to the complaint allegations and later they were let off. Hence the statement of the alleged detenue falsifies the contents of the petition. Hence, we do not see any truth in the telegram. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. ____________________ (A. GOPAL REDDY, J.) ______________________________ (NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J.) 11th February, 2008 Js.