IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.28903 of 2011 Satish Narayan Dhar Versus The State Of Bihar ***** 02. 19.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in connection with Vigilance P.S. Case No. 33/92, corresponding to Special Case No. 183/2002 for offences under Sections 420/467/468/471/477A/109 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 5(1)(d) read with Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, is one of the named accused in this 19 years old case. Submission is that in spite of finding that obviously the petitioner deserves anticipatory bail but the court below refused to grant the privilege. Considering the facts and circumstances for the reasons mentioned in the order of Special Judge, Vigilance, North Bihar, Muzaffarpur, passed in A.B.P. No. 19/2010. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Vigilance, North Bihar, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Vigilance P.S. Case No. 33/92, corresponding to Special Case No. 183/2002, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly till disposal of the case, in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)