WP(C) 5197/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE UB SAHA The instant writ petition is filed by the petitioner to quash the decision of th e respondent authorities in rejecting the quotation of the petitioner-company in response to the NIT 4/2010-11 (Annexure-1 to the writ petition) along with pray er for interim order. Heard Mr. M Choudhury, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. RK Agarwal, learne d counsel for the petitioner-company as well as Mr. SC Keyal, learned counsel fo r the respondents who appears at the motion stage. Mr. Choudhury while urging for the relief sought for would contend that on 13.09 .2010 a representative of the petitioner-company met with respondent No. 3 who i n turn informed him that due to non-filing of the original quotation which was p urchased by the petitioner-company the tender of the company has been rejected. He further urges that there is no mention in the NIT that notice in original has to be filed with the quotation when the quotation filed by the petitioner-compa ny is admittedly an original one. In response to the aforesaid submission, learned counsel for the respondents wou ld contend that the instant writ petition is not maintainable only on the ground that till now neither the respondents rejected the quotation of the petitioner nor took any decision for rejecting. He further submitted that the writ petition has been filed only with an apprehension. It is further submitted by Mr. Keyal that till now no work order has been issued in favour in any of the tenderers. In view of the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the respondents t his Court is of the considered opinion that the instant writ petition is not mai ntainable at this stage, as neither the rights of the petitioner have been affec ted by the action of the authorities nor the fundamental rights of the petitione r- have been violated. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of being not maintainable. However, the disposal of the writ petition would not be a bar for the petitioner to approach the appropriate court if any decision is taken by the respondents a ffecting the rights of the petitioner. No order as to costs.