RESPGNDENT m agg M/s Modi Cement Company Lick (Now M’s Ambuj'a Cement Eastem L ct}, Through S’nri Devanand Panciey, Dy. GM. (P&A), P0. Rawen, Tahsil Baiada Bazar, District Raipur (CG) Versus Union of India, Through Generai Manager; South Eastern RaiNvay (Now South East Centrai Raiiway), Biiaspur (C.G.) APPEAL UNDER SECTION 23 OF THE RAILWAY CLAIMS TRlaUNAL ACT, 1987 (Sinqie Bench: Hon‘bie Mr. N.K. Aqarwah J.) Present : $hr§ Amit Choudhary, counsel with Ms. Naushina Aii, counsei for the respondent. (Passeé on 20m day of Aprii, 2mm Shri Amit Choudhary along with M‘s. Naus'nina Aii‘ learned counse! for the respondent referring to sub—section (1} of Section 23 of the Raiiways Ciaims Tribunal Act, $871 have raised a preiiminary objection about the maintainabiiity of the present appeai beforethe High Court of Chhattisgarh as the impugned judgment has been passed by Ehopai Bench of Raiiwaye Ctaims Tribunal, which is located within the territorial jurisdiction of Madhya Praciesh High Court. 3. Permission granted. i 4. With the above iiberty, the appeai is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. The Registry is ciirected to return the certified copy of the imouqned iudgment to learned counsei for the appeiiant immediateiy. C Shri Ashish Shrivastava, learned counsel tor the appeilant, in view of the preliminary objection, seeks permission to withdraw the appeai with the iiiqerty of filing another appeal before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. 2. Sdl- N.K. Agrawal Judge HIGH CGURT G? CHHA'FiiSGARi-l AT WLIASPUR §EIS¢ELLANE$U$ APPEAL NC) 179 6F 2(395 AIW’ELLANT Shri Ashish Shrivastava, counsei for the appeilant. QRAL §RDER