^ BEFOnE: TOE ft.P.STATE AOriI»IST8ATIU£ TRIBUNAL AT ^ABALPUR $7fi.No. !2./_( 3^4, '199 ^^J^^Q ^ Sukaloo s/o gudtiar yiahukama 0/0 Executivs Enginesr ^atas gesaurcss 3epartnieRt,Karuadha Biwision»|i;auardha Distb-fiaJBan£igaon,R/o Adharsta liagar, Kauardha>Oistt-Rajnandgaon. ff sr sa s -AppJlicant '-i- I.St-ate of B.P.through the secrstary, Uater fiesources DepartiaBnt, Vallabh Bhauan» 2«CB)ief £BgJ.ns8r»BabanadiSeadauari> Kachhar iilater Besources Ospartffiant, fiaj-pur. • . 3. s t.'perintend.i.ng EngiBser, yatsr SBsources oepart*ent» Shivnatt'i nandal>0urg« 4»£xecutiuaEngjLneer,lijatsr aesourcss lartnsrittKauardha Oivision,Kauardha» B istt-Rajnandgaon. -Responaants APPLICATION uyOE.R SCCTION 19 8F THt; AQ|i'tINISTRATIU£ T8IBUISIAL ACT,Jl.985_. Bj.TAILS^O.F, JHfc_ APPLICAUON; 1 •Particulsrs of the appUcan t; As ataous. 2.partieulars of. the rsspoadentsi As abova. ^.^ar^ticula^eof ttseavdei agaj.nst ub.ich the AppTicaEZoni'sBa3e{ i)Agsi(»st the ordar ,dt« iijPasssd by; 4.8.1995 Bespondsn t So»4 I@ fS H i HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.1185/2005 PETITIONER Sukaloo RESPQNDENTS Versus State of Madhya Pradesh and others Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihotri. J. Present: - None for the petitioner. Shri N. Naha Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 12 day of November, 2009) The matter is called for hearing twice. On both occasions, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. (2) In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the petitioner forthwith. V" Sd/- \ Satish K. Agnihotn \ Judge urnane 1*C.: