: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1122 OF 2009 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1382 OF 2009 Dilip Balkrishna Kadam & Anr. .. Appellants V/s. Baban Gangaram Wagh .. Respondent Mr. Ajit J. Kenjale for the Appellants. Mr. Dhananjay Rananaware for the Respondent. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 24 TH FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C.: 1. The Appeal from Order has been preferred against the order dated 3rd October, 2009, passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Satara in Special Civil Suit No.87 of 2009. By this order, the appellants-defendants have been restrained from disturbing the possession of the suit land, which the trial Court has found to be with the respondent-plaintiff. 2. The recent 7/12 Extract is produced today before me which, according to the learned Advocate : 2 : for the appellants, was made available only after the impugned order was passed. He submits that the 7/12 Extract shows that the appellants are in possession of the suit land. 3. In my opinion, there is no need to interfere with the order passed by the trial Court as it was passed on the basis of the documents available on record before it. However, it is made clear that during the pendency of the Suit, the respondent- plaintiff shall not create any third party rights or interests in the suit land. 4. The trial Court in any event has expedited the Suit. The trial Court is, therefore, requested to decide the Suit as far as possible by 31st December, 2010. 5. The Appeal from Order is disposed of. 6. In view of the above, Civil Application No.1382 of 2009 pending in the Appeal from Order does not survive and the same is dismissed as infructuous.