IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 25TH JANUARY 2011 / 5TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 36001 of 2010(A) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- M.P.PARAMESWARAN NAMBOODIRI, SUPERINTENDENT (RETD.), ALUVA MUNICIPALITY, RESIDING AT MARUTHOOR KARA MANA, "PRASADAM", U.C.COLLEGE P.O., ALUVA-683102. BY ADVS. SRI.K.JAJU BABU SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI SRI.T.R.SADEESAN SMT.DHANYA CHANDRAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. ALUVA MUNICIPALITY, ALUVA-683101, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF URBAN AFFAIRS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. R1 BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KURIAN, SC FOR MUNICIPALITY R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.ANTONY MUKKATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.36001/2010 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE ORDER NO.P8-654/10 DATED 7/6/2010 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P2 COPY OF THE ORDER NO.G2-6166/08 DATED 3/9/2010 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P3 COPY OF THE ORDER NO.G1-3465/08 DATED 4/5/2010 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P4 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 6/8/2010. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No. 36001 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 25th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner retired from the service of the Aluva Municipality on 31.03.2010. Retirement benefits due to the petitioner had not been fully paid off is the grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition. On 20.12.2010 I passed the following order: “Admit. The learned standing counsel takes notice on behalf of the 1st respondent. The learned Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the 2nd respondent. All admitted retirement benefits due to the petitioner including the earned leave surrender value, DA arrears etc. shall be paid to the petitioner within a month.” Today an I.A. No.869/2011 has been filed seeking extension of time to comply with the said direction. The Municipality has no case that the retirement benefits claimed by the petitioner are not due to the petitioner except perhaps for an amount of Rs.22,242/- in respect of W.P.(C)No. 36001 of 2010 -2- which sanction from the Director of Municipal Administration is awaited. In the above circumstances I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondent to see that the entire retirement benefits due to the petitioner is disbursed to him within two months from today. Sd/- S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE //True copy// P.A. TO JUDGE shg/