IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 13TH KARTHIKA 1931 RP.No. 1066 of 2009(E) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.5714/2008 Dated 12/10/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER. --------------------------------------------------- HARIHARAN, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.KOCHURAMAN, CHATHANKADATH HOUSE, PODIYOOR P.O., THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR SMT.P.A.ANITHA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. EDATHIRINJI SERVICE CO-OP.BANK LTD, NO.R.137, EDATHIRINJI ,THRISSUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SALE OFFICER/CO-OPERATIVE INSPECTOR, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, MUKUNDAPURAM, IRINJALAKUDA SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR SRI.G.SREEKUMAR, CHELUR FOR R1 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. `````````````````````````````````````````````````` R.P. No.1066 of 2009 in W.P.(C) No. 5714 of 2008 E `````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 4th day of November, 2009 O R D E R This review petition is filed by the petitioner in the writ petition seeking to correct an inadvertent mistake in the judgment. After hearing, I am satisfied that there is an inadvertent mistake in the judgment, which needs to be corrected. Accordingly, in the first sentence of paragraph 4 of the judgment, the words “out of Rs.10 lakhs” shall be omitted. The review petition is allowed as above. The Registry shall carry out necessary correction in the judgment. Sd/- (S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge