IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26029 of 2008 BALESHWAR RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 30.7.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Patory P.S. Case No.40 of 2003 for the alleged offences registered under sections 420, 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the allegation made in the First Information Report is to the effect that the petitioner forcibly harvested the crops. As a matter of fact, the petitioner did not commit any offence since the plot in question as mentioned in the First Information Report belongs to the petitioner, which would be evident from perusal of the copy of the Khatiyan, as contained in Annexure 2, as well as the genealogical table, as contained in Annexure 2/1 Considering the submissions and in the facts and circumstances of the case, it is 2 directed that the petitioner Baleshwar Rai, in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Patory P.S. Case No.40/2003 (G.R. No.431/2003), within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)