IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.220 of 2008 USHA DEVI & ORS Versus NAVIN CHANDRA JHA ----------- 4 16/12/2008 From the stand taken by the sole opposite party in his affidavit filed before this Court in this case it would be clear that the opposite party is a temporary employee in Tata Motors, whose employment is itself intermittent in nature. This fact, stated in the affidavit, is not controverted by the petitioner, who on the last occasion had sought adjournment for this purpose. It thus becomes clear that the final order passed by the court below under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure awarding Rs.500/- for each of the four petitioners totaling Rs.2000/- per month for its being paid by husband/father, opposite party is just and appropriate in the facts and circumstances of this case and needs no further enhancement for the present. As the sole point involved in this application was with regard to quantum of the amount of maintenance, as determined 2 by the court below and that stands answered in view of aforementioned admitted position relating to income of the opposite party, nothing more survives for adjudication by this Court in the present case. Consequently this application is dismissed with a direction to the opposite party to deposit the entire amount of arrears and current as per the impugned order within a period of three months, if any portion thereof has not been paid as yet. With the aforementioned observation/direction this application is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar