IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28037 of 2010 PRAMOD YADAV, SON OF SURESH PRASAD YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHRAMARPUR, POLICE STATION BIHPUR, DISTRICT BHAGALPUR. …..Petitioner. Versus THE UNION OF INDIA …..Opposite Party. For the Petitioner : Mr. Naresh Chandra Verma (Adv.) For the State : Mr. Raghib Ahsan, Addl. Solicitor General of India. ----------- 03/ 06.10.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Union of India. The petitioner is an accused of the case registered under Section 20 and 23 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act in which allegation is he was apprehended with 60 Kgs. of Ganja. The seized Ganja was of commercial quantity. The recovered Ganja is of commercial quantity. The provision of grant of bail to an accused who is involved in offence relating to recovery of commercial quantity is prescribed under Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act and the accused is entitled to be released only if the court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that he is not guilty of such offence and that he is not likely to commit 2 such offence while on bail. There is nothing on record from which these inferences can be drawn. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the above named petitioner. Accordingly his prayer for bail is again rejected. However, the trial court is directed to expedite the disposal of the case. kksinha/- (Shyam kishore Sharma, J.)