1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Writ Petition No. 4035 of 2011 (Ashok Ganpat Bhandekar & Ors. v. Latif Kondaji Atar & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. S.G. Bhalerao, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. K.M. Suryawanshi, AGP for respondent No. 4 PER COURT : The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners states that the writ petition has become infructuous, because the impugned order is already executed. He, therefore, sought permission to withdraw the writ petition, but he said that the suit pending before the lower Court is pending since 2002 and same may be directed to be expeditiously disposed of. The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. The learned Judge of the trial Court shall make endeavour to dispose of the Regular Civil Suit No. 44 of 2008 as expeditiously as possible and in any case within one year from today. 20th October, 2011 ( A.V.NIRGUDE, J. ) SRM/ 2