IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1638 of 2009 1. RAMESHWAR BHAGAT 2. Ramnath Bhagat Both sons of Late Bhola Bhagat 3. Ramdhari Bhagat S/o Late Biltan Bhagat All residents of village- Nawada, Anchal- Vaishali, P.S. Vaishali, District Vaishali .............. appellants Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Director, Consolidation, Bihar, Patna 3. The Joint Director Consolidation, Vaishali at Hajipur 4. The Deputy Director, Consolidation, Vaishali at Hajipur 5. The Assistant Consolidation Officer, Vaishali at Lalganj 6. Bahadur Bhagat S/o Late Butan Bhagat, resident of village- Nawada, Anchal- Vaishali, P.S. Vaishali, District Vaishali ...............respondents ----------- 2 04-01-2010 I.A. no. 8616/2009 This is an application for condonation of delay of 285 days in preferring this appeal. Before adverting to the factum of delay, we thought it apt to address ourselves to the case on merits. On perusal of the order passed by the learned Single Judge, it is manifest that he has observed that the questions that have arisen in the writ petition are in the realm of facts. In view of aforesaid, we do not find any merit in the appeal and accordingly, there is no warrant to issue notice in the application for condonation of delay. Needless to emphasize that it is open to the appellants, if so advised and law so permits, to agitate their grievance before the appropriate forum as per law. With the aforesaid observation, the Letters Patent 2 Appeal stands disposed of. BKS/- (Dipak Misra, CJ.) (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)