IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39923 of 2011 Sekh Md. Jokhu @ Sk. Jokhu, Son of Late SK. Majhar, R/o Village Parsa, P.S. Purshottampur, District West Champaran (Bettiah). -------Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar -----Opposite Party ---------------- 02/- 09/12/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 366/504/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, is one of the two named accused in this case with allegation of keeping the daughter-in-law of the informant in his house for the purposes of marriage with his son co-accused non-petitioner. Submission is of false implication and in fact the lady has some soft relationship with the son of the petitioner and came into the house with him, but the petitioner thrown her out which also appears from the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. There is counter version also by way of Purshottampur P.S. Case No. 36 of 2011 at the instance of another son of the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, in connection with Purshottampur P.S. Case No. 35 of 2011, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below till disposal of the case and in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)