IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10486 of 2011 Dr.Kumari Sapna DAUGHTER OF SRI RAVINDRA NATH MANDAL, PRESENTLY POSTED AS INCHARGE PRINCIPAL, DR. R.B. ROY (INTER) COLLEGE, HAJIPUR (VAISHALI) Versus 1. The Bhim Rao Ambedkar(B.R.A.)UNIVERSITY, MUZAFFARPUR THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, B.R.A. UNIVERSITY, MUZAFFARPUR. 3. THE REGISTRAR, B.R.A. UNIVERSITY, MUZAFFARPUR. 4. THE INSPECTORS OF COLLEGE, B.R.A. UNIVERSITY, MUZAFFARPUR. 5. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 6. THE DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION (HIGHER SECONDARY), GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. ---------------------------------- 2 13/09/2011 The so called incharge Principal of the so called Institution has rushed to the High Court because two of the so called teachers of the Institution in question have approached the University for some kind of recognition of the College as a degree College though it is an Intermediate College. Petitioner anticipates mischief and foul play. The interest of the Institution has to be taken care of and fully protected by the Managing Committee as a whole. The acting Principal may be at the helms of affair - 2 - but it is neither her personal property nor personal fiefdom for which she has all the authority to litigate on behalf of the Institution. In absence of proof that the Managing Committee has resolved and authorized the petitioner to approach the High Court, the present writ could be to protect her personal interest. This Court is of the opinion that this writ application may not be maintained in the present form and content. If the Managing Committee resolves and decides to approach the High Court, may be through the Principal, on the basis of such authorization, yet another writ application may be maintained but this writ application is dismissed in the above stated circumstance. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)