IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 10425 of 2010 Date of Decision: 28.5.2010 Ramesh Kumar Bansal ....Petitioner. Versus Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Rakesh Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. By way of instant petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned orders dated 13.8.2008 (Annexure P-2) passed by respondent No.3, dated 16.7.2009 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent No.4 and the inspection report dated 1.8.2008 (Annexure P-3); further for issuance of writ of mandamus directing respondents No.1 to 3 to return the amount of Rs.1,71,234/- deposited as penalty for theft of electricity, alongwith application dated 14.8.2008 (Annexure P-4). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to make a detailed and comprehensive representation to the respondents in respect of the claim made in the writ petition. In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to make a detailed and comprehensive representation to respondents for the claim made in the instant writ petition. In case such a representation is made by the petitioner, the same shall be decided by the concerned respondent by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of its filing. May 28, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE