IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4869 of 2007 KRISHNA CHAND Versus THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER & ANR ----------- 02/ 10.05.2010 Mr Dhruv Narayan Choudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr Rajiv Kumar Singh learned counsel for Employees Provident Fund Organization are present. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of Employees Provident Fund Organization. The petitioner has disputed the calculation of his pension under the provision of Employees’ Pension Scheme, 1995. According to the petitioner though he was entitled for pension Rs 1178/- per month in terms of stipulation but the respondents have determined his pension only at Rs 683/- per month under PPO No. BR/PAT/14932. He thus submits that the petitioner was put to a loss of Rs 495/- per month. Learned counsel representing for the Employees Provident Fund Organization with reference to the statement made in the counter affidavit submits that the claim of the petitioner was examined in the light of the stipulation as also amendment introduced in the year 2007 and the pension of the petitioner was re-calculated. Accordingly, pension has been rightly calculated at Rs 683/- per month. The detail of calculation has been appended as annexure D to the counter affidavit. In that view of the matter, nothing survives in the present proceeding. The petitioner, if so advised, may represent before the authority, if he disputes the calculation made by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner which shall be considered and disposed - 2 - of in accordance with law. This disposes of this writ petition. shahid (Jyoti Saran , J)