IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND OCTOBER 2008 / 30TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 12156 of 2006(V) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- G.RAMACHANDRAN, S/O. GANAPATHY, RESIDING AT VANAJA MANDIRAM, THARAVATH PADI, PIRAYIRI P.O., PALAKKAD-678 009. BY ADV. SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH, SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO CO-OPERATION (C) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), PALAKKAD. 3. THE PALAKKAD CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY LTD., NO.F-1078, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, CHITTUR ROAD, PALAKKAD - 678 013. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. MOHAMMED ANZAR FOR R1 & R2, ADV. SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM FOR R3. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.12156/2006-V: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN O.P. NO. 10756/2000 DTD. 23/10/2003. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE RESOLUTION NO.1 DTD. 23/12/03. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 09/02/2005. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE LETTER DTD. 11/02/2005. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE LETTER DTD. 11/02/2005. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DTD. 14/02/2005. EXT.P.7: COPY OF THE ARGUMENT NOTE DTD. 03/01/06. EXT.P.8: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 18/02/2006. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. prv. KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ----------------------------------------- W.P(C) No.12156 of 2006 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of October, 2008 JUDGMENT The challenge is on Ext.P8 order passed by the first respondent. It is seen that the Government has remanded Ext.P3 to the second respondent for fresh consideration. According to the petitioner since some of the findings have become final, even according to the Government those findings are not liable to be re-opened. Petitioner may point out those aspects before the second respondent in which case the second respondent will consider those contentions also and pass appropriate orders in the matter expeditiously. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to pass consequential orders pursuant to Ext.P8 with notice to the petitioner and the 3rd respondent, within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. (KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE) ahg. KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ----------------------------------- W.P(C).No.12156 of 2006 ----------------------------------- JUDGMENT 22nd October, 2008