17.3.2025 Sl. 13 Samarpita Court No.655 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction Appellate Side CRA 10 of 2000 In the matter of: Kajal Sarkar –vs.- The State of West Bengal Mr. Jayanta Mukherjee … for the appellant-convict 1. This appeal is preferred challenging the impugned judgement and conviction passed by the learned Trial Court. 2. Appellant-convict is represented by the learned Counsel but, there is no representative on behalf of the State. 3. An accommodation is prayed for on behalf of the appellant-convicts. It is candidly submitted by the learned Counsel that presently he has no contact with the present appellant-convict and, as such, accommodation is prayed for. 4. As there is no representative on behalf of the State. Learned Public Prosecutor of this Court is requested to appoint one Counsel from the State-panel of advocates. 5. Let the matter appear in the list on 9th April, 2025. 6. Let this order be communicated to the Learned Public Prosecutor of this Court by the department, immediately. (Prasenjit Biswas, J.) 2