THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23305 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner functioned as Assistant Programme Officer in the Society for Elimination of Rural Poverty. Alleging that he misappropriated the funds, the Project Director, respondent No.2 herein, placed the petitioner under suspension through proceedings, dated 08.05.2010. The same is challenged in this writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development. The order of suspension was preceded by a show cause notice in which the details of acts of misappropriation said to have been resorted to by the petitioner are furnished. It is no doubt true that the petitioner submitted his explanation. However, respondent No.2 felt that the matter is grave enough and placed the petitioner under suspension. No exception cane be taken to the same. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client has not been paid subsistence allowance. In the impugned order, it is stated that the petitioner would be paid the subsistence allowance. Therefore, respondent No.2 cannot deny the same. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, upholding the order of suspension, but directing respondent No.2 to pay the subsistence allowance to the petitioner in accordance with the relevant provisions of law till the conclusion of the enquiry. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:18.08.2011 kdl