HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR W.P.(S) No. 6405 of 2007 PETITIONER Devnarayan Jangde, aged ahoiit 39 years, S/o Sliri Stiaukar Lal Jaagde, Ass.istaut Teacher, Govemment. Middle School Uchchabhatti (E) Vilas Khaad Sai^ngarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) Versus ii»f» 1. Statc of Chhattisgarh, througli the Secretary, Department of Tribal, Dau Kaiyan Siagh Bhawaa, Raipur (C,G.) 2. The Assistant Comiiussioner Department ofTribal, Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITIOS USDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE COHSTITUIOH OP IHOIA Appearaiice: Shri IJ.R. Koshley, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Satish Giipta, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the State/ respondents on advance copy. (01.11.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SIHHA, J. Heard on adtnisaion. Leamed counsel for the petifion.er siihmifs that the petitioner has passcd B.Ed. examioation on his own expenses, therefore, he is eutitied to TRCRWR troo advance inci-einents accotding to cu-culai-s dated 24.12.1098 and 01.03.1999. He also siibinits that in many identical matters, the petitions taave been aUowed in terms of thr. oi-der passed m the. case of Yashwemt Kunuir Bhtarcwlwai Vs. SSunicipal CorporaSxon, Burg? wvO. anather {3006 Siy MPJS-CG 96}. He siihmits that his case is sqiiarely coveTcd by ttie said .hidgment. This legal position is not riispiited by the leamcd counsel for thc State. However, he siibroits that the orrter may be passed in tenns of the said JTidgnient, but it slia11 be. snbject to verification regai-ding petitioTier's siich qiialification. W.P.(S1.6405/5.007 AccoT-dingly, the writ petitioTi js allowcd in terms of the order passed in case of Vash]»ant Kumar Bhnradiuaj Vs. Muivdpal Corparalicm, Dvirg and annther (Supra) snbject to the verifk'.ation of the facts as to whether the pF.tition.er had acquired B.Ed. Examination Certificate on his own cxpenses as per circiriai-s dater) 24.13.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further whether he has lieen paid two advance mcrements or not. This }3ftition stands finafly disposed of. No oivler as to costs. S'jnil Kumar Sinha Judge /ffoo/