HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.16407 OF 2007 ORDER: The petitioner feels aggrieved by the proceedings, dated 11-06-2007, through which the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation accorded permission to the 3rd respondent to make construction over plot Nos.27 (P) & 28 in survey Nos.317/1 & 318 of Chandanagar, Ranga Reddy District. The petitioner has referred to various proceedings pertaining to the title in respect of the land referred to above. Ultimately, he contends that the 3rd respondent has no title in respect of the land and that the Municipal Corporation ought not to have accorded permission. He has also referred to the suits that are already pending before various courts. 2. The 3rd respondent filed a counter – affidavit opposing the writ petition. It is stated that she had acquired valid title over the land and that the proceedings in the Civil Court are pending in relation to the same land. 3 . Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 and the learned counsel for the 3rd respondent. 4. The basic objection raised by the petitioner for the permission accorded in favour of the 3rd respondent is about the title in respect of the property. It is not in dispute that certain suits, be at the instance of the petitioner or the 3rd respondent, are pending in the Civil Court. This Court cannot adjudicate the question pertaining to title. The petitioner can pursue his remedies in the pending suits or by filing a fresh suit, if it is warranted. 5. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue the remedies before the Civil Court. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J March 11, 2011. KTL