IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE TUESDAY, THE 21ST AUGUST 2007 / 30TH SRAVANA 1929 CRP.No. 1060 of 2006() ---------------------- OP(ELE).61/2004 of DISTRICT COURT, KASARAGOD .................... REVN. PETITIONER: RESPONDENT: -------------------------------------- KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDHYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC FOR KSEB RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER: -------------------------------- SMT.V.V.PUSHPA, D/O.V.V.NARAYANI, AGED 25 YEARS, THIMIRI, KUTHIRAMCHAL P.O., KASARAGOD DIST. THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: CRP No. 1060 of 2006 ORDER ON IA NO. 3700 0F 2006 IN CRP NO.1060 OF 2006 DISMISSED 21.08.2007 SD/- PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ------------------------------- C.R.P. No. 1060 OF 2006 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of August, 2007 JUDGMENT Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, who addressed me very strenuously on all the grounds raised the Revision Petition. I find that the excess compensation which has been awarded by the court below is Rs.8,950/- only and even the interest rate is kept as low as 6%. Having gone through the judgment, I am not able to say that the findings are vitiated and that too by any jurisdictional infirmity. The Civil Revision Petition will stand dismissed. It is made clear that this judgment will not cause any prejudice to any other revision petition filed by the KSEB against the other cases which have been decided under the common order, since I am refusing to interfere with the impugned order mainly because of the smallness of the stakes involved. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE btt WPC 2