Crl. Misc. No. M – 35383 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- Crl. Misc. No. M – 35383 of 2009 Date of decision:- 17.2.2010 Ved Parkash & Ors. ... Petitioners Versus The State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present:- Mr. Raj Kapoor Malik, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Raja Sharma, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Randeep Singh, Advocate, for the complainant. Gurdev Singh, J (oral) Crl. Misc. No. 7965 of 2010 Allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl. Misc. No. 35383 of 2009 Heard. The petitioners – Ved Parkash, Sandeep and Darbara have come up with the present petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the grant of regular bail in FIR No. 80 dated 10.7.2009 registered at Police Station Dhand District Kaithal, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323 and 302 IPC. This FIR was recorded on the basis of the statement of Parveen Kumar-complainant. According to him the dispute took place between them and the accused-party on 9.7.2009 regarding the removing of the water pipe from the water pump. He narrated in the FIR that it was the non- Crl. Misc. No. M – 35383 of 2009 -2- applicants Naresh Kumar, Ramesh Kumar and Balwan Singh, who were armed with gandasis and axe and that they were those accused, who cause injuries to Karan Singh – deceased. According to him the present petitioner only gave kick and fist blows to him and his father. The MLR reports of the complainant and his father have been placed on record. Only one injury each was found on their person, which were found simple in nature. Petitioners never caused injuries to the deceased. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners the complainant by throwing the net wider has roped in the present petitioners, who are related to the other accused and that they are coming in custody since 11.7.2009. It is not the contention of the learned State Counsel that petitioners are required for the purposes of investigation. Challan has already been presented in the court. The conclusion of the trial will take long time. Keeping in view all these facts; especially the part which has been attributed to the present petitioners, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of this case, they are ordered to be released on bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court. February 17, 2010 (Gurdev Singh) tripti Judge