IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No. 3627 of 2011 JAI KUMAR MANDAL, S/O RAM PRATAP MANDAL, R/O VILLAGE – BADURI, P.S. – SAHIYARA, DISTRICT - SITAMARHI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 14.03.2011 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 307, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. It is alleged in the F.I.R. that the petitioner got the deceased’ motor cycle stopped and asked for the mobile, in the meantime, others came and started firing. Subsequently, the father of the deceased registered a case and made allegation against the persons who lodged the first F.I.R. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application in view of the fact that the petitioner is not named as assailant in the first F.I.R., moreover, the father of the deceased made allegations against the informant of the first case and has not named the petitioner and dispose of the regular bail application on the same day, if possible. With observation above the application is disposed of. Praful/- ( Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.) 2