IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 10516 of 2000 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- SONU @ PRAKASH BHOJUMAL TAHELRAMANI SINDHI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR HR PRAJAPATI for Petitioner MR SAMIR DAVE, APP for Respondent No. 1, 2, 3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE Date of decision: 17/01/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT #. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that this matter is squarely covered by two decisions of this court, namely Special Civil Application No.8906/2000 in the case of Sonu @ Sonu Langdo Laxmandas Lanvani Sindhi v. State of Gujarat decided on 13.10.2000 (Coram: A.L.Dave, J.) and of this Court in Special Civil Application No.10364/2000 decided on 11.1.2001. The learned counsel for the respondents is unable to satisfy how this petition is not covered by these two decisions. #. In the result, this special civil application succeeds and the same is allowed and the detention order dated 30th August, 2000, Annexure-A, is quashed and set aside. Rule is made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. The detenue shall be set free forthwith if he is not required in any other case. ....... (sunil)