(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1321 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 1321 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 1321 OF 2005 Smt. Kusum Kondu Dhangar ...Petitioner Versus Liladhar Jethalal Shah ...Respondent ..... Mr. Ambar Joshi, counsel for Petitioner ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 17TH MARCH, 2005 DATED: 17TH MARCH, 2005 DATED: 17TH MARCH, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. Heard. 2. The view taken by the court below in rejecting the application at Exh.5 is a possible view and therefore, it does not call for any interference in this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution. Admittedly, the plaintiff did not seek any relief against the Power of Attorney and this application was filed to implead him as an additional defendant solely under the apprehension that he may turn hostile as a witness as and when called for in Special Civil Suit No.379 of 1998 as well. 3. The writ petition is rejected summarily.