IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 12TH AUGUST 2011 / 21ST SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 22043 of 2011(E) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- 1. SHAMEEL V.UMMER,S/O.UMMER,AGED 23 YEARS, VELLUTHATTIL HOUSE,VATTAMPADAM,P.O KOCHANUR, VIA VADAKEKAD,TRICHUR DISTRICT. 2. SAIF AL JEHAD MOIDEEN KUTTY, S/O.MOIDEEN KUTTY AGED 23 YEARS, UTHAKADAVATH HOUSE,PARAVANNA,TIRUR,MALAPPURAM. 3. JIHAD HAROON T.C, S/O.HANOON ABDULLA,AGED 24 YEARS, ROSHNI,JUBILEE ROAD,THALASSERY 670 101. 4. VISHNU C.B, S/O.BALAKRISHNAN, AGED 23 YEARS,CHATTUPADATH HOUSE, PANNAYURKULAM P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 5. ARSHAD ABDUL SAMAD, S/O.ABDUL SAMAD,AGED 24 YEARS, VELIYATHEYIL HOUSE, PANNAYURKULAM P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 6. SAFEED ALI, S/O.ALI, AGED 25 YEARS, NADUTHODI HOUSE,VALANCHERY,MALAPPURAM 676 552. BY ADVS. SRI.K.M.FIROZ, SMT.M.SHAJNA. Kss ..2/- ..2.... WPC.NO.22043/2011 E RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENJIPPALAM, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O, - 673 635, MALAPPURAM. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN,CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O, 673 635, MALAPPURAM. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC,UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.22043/2011 E APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE REVALUATION APPLICATION OF 4TH SEMESTER B.TECH ELECTRONIC AND COMMUNICATION EXAMINATION CONDUCTED ON JUNE,2010 BEARING NO.247003 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.1 BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT DTD. 25/03/2011. P2: COPY OF THE REVALUATION APPLICATION OF 6TH SEMESTER B.TECH ELECTRONIC AND COMMUNICATION EXAMINATION CONDUCTED ON JUNE,2010 BEARING NO.52 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.2 BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT DTD. 28/03/2011. P3: COPY OF THE REVALUATION APPLICATION OF 4TH SEMESTER B.TECH ELECTRONIC AND COMMUNICATION EXAMINATION CONDUCTED ON JUNE,2010 BEARING NO.251192 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.3 BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT DTD. 27/03/2011. P4: COPY OF THE REVALUATION APPLICATION OF 4TH SEMESTER B.TECH ELECTRONIC AND COMMUNICATION EXAMINATION CONDUCTED ON JUNE,2010 BEARING NO.251193 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.4 BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT DTD. 27/03/2011. P5: COPY OF THE REVALUATION APPLICATION OF 4TH SEMESTER B.TECH ELECTRONIC AND COMMUNICATION EXAMINATION CONDUCTED ON JUNE,2010 BEARING NO.247002 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.5 BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT DTD. 25/03/2011. P6: COPY OF THE REVALUATION APPLICATION OF 4TH SEMESTER B.TECH ELECTRONIC AND COMMUNICATION EXAMINATION CONDUCTED ON JUNE,2010 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.6 BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT DTD. 28/03/2011. P7: COPY OF THE RECEIPT NO.10328/04/2470003 DTD. 28/03/2011 SUBMITTED ALONG WITH EXHIBIT P1. P8: COPY OF THE CHALAN DTD. 24/03/2011 ISSUED BY STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, VALANCHERY SUBMITTED ALONG WITH EXHIBIT P2. P9: COPY OF THE RECEIPT NO.TSR110327/04/251192 DTD. 27/03/2011 SUBMITTED ALONG WITH EXHIBIT P3. P10: COPY OF THE RECEIPT NO.TSR110327/04/251193 DTD. 27/03/2011 SUBMITTED ALONG WITH EXHIBIT P4. P11: COPY OF THE RECEIPT NO.10328/04/247002 DTD. 28/03/2011 SUBMITTED ALONG WITH EXHIBIT P5. P12: COPY OF THE CHALAN DTD. 24/03/2011 ISSUED BY STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, VALANCHERY SUBMITTED ALONG WITH EXHIBIT P6. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE KSS ANTONY DOMINIC, J --------------------------------------- W.P(C) No. 22043 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of August, 2011. JUDGMENT Petitioners have undergone B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the fourth Semester examination was declared, they had failed in some papers. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE