1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2273 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5864 OF 1998 Sarva Shramik Sanghatna, Pune ..Petitioner. Vs. The Director, Sports & Youth Services, MS & Ors. ..Respondents. and Vijay Kundalik Kamble and another ..Applicants. .... Smt. Gayatri Singh with Ms. Bhavana Mhatre for the Applicants. Mr. Bhavesh Parmar for the Petitioner. Mr. Parag Bhosale for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. .... CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 1st October, 2008. P.C. : The Petition before the Court was being pursued by the Sarva Shramik Sanghatana Pune. Mr. Bhavesh Parmar, learned advocate had filed his Vakalatnama. Counsel appearing for the Petitioner stated that on 7th September, 2007 Sarva Shramik Sanghatana, Pune furnished instructions to the effect that it was unable to pursue the proceedings and that Sarva Shramik Sanghatana, Mumbai may be permitted to take up the 2 proceedings. The Civil Application has been filed by two workmen who seek to pursue the proceedings since the original Petitioner has not taken any steps in the matter since the admission of the Petition. On the request of the learned counsel, the two Applicants to the Civil Application are permitted to be impleaded as Petitioners instead and in place of Sarva Shramik Sanghatana, Pune. Mr. Bhavesh Parmar prays that he may be discharged from the proceedings since Ms. Gayatri Singh has received instructions to appear on behalf of the substituted Petitioners. Permission is granted. Ms. Gayatri Singh undertakes to file her Vakalatnama during the course of the week. The Applicants will be at liberty, if they are so advised, to take out a fresh Civil Application to pursue the interim prayer which was sought in the Civil Application for impleadment. The Civil Application is disposed of. Amendment to be carried out within two weeks. *****