THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 5118 of 2011 DATED: 07.03.2011 Between: Habeeb Mohammed. ..... PETITIONER And Aruna Sri M.Reddy & 12 others. .....RESPONDENTS ORDER: : (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghu Ram) Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 2. This Writ Petition is fundamentally misconceived. It is directed against the order, dated 24.12.2010, of the learned Special Court under the A.P.Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982, allowing I.A.No.1430 of 2010 filed by the 1st respondent herein, the applicant in L.G.C.No.12 of 2009. 3. The 1st respondent herein filed I.A.No.1430 of 2010 to summon one A.Bhaskar, presently working as Regional Deputy Director, Survey and Land Records, Narayanaguda, to testify as the witness with reference to his report filed before the Collector vide a letter, dated 06.01.2009, which is referred to in the report furnished under Rule 6(2) of the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Rules, 1988 to the Tribunal. Petitioner, who is the 3rd respondent in the L.G.C., agreed to the summoning of the said Bhaskar for tendering evidence in the L.G.C., but subject to production of wasool baqi, Town Survey record in file No.B2/1117/99 along with total correspondence between the Revenue Divisional Officer, Hyderabad and Deputy Director, Survey & Land Records, Hyderabad and Lr.No.A/587/2007, dated 26.07.2007, addressed to the Tahsildar, Himayathnagar mandal, Hyderabad District along with copy of the Lr.No.A9/694/2007, dated 06.08.2007, addressed to the Tahsildar, Himayathnagar along with wasool baqi submitted to the Tahsildar, Himayathnagar mandal. 4. The above request was negatived by the learned Special Court and I.A.No.1430 of 2010 was allowed permitting to summon the witness-Bhaskar for the purpose pleaded in I.A.No.1430 of 2010. Without acceding to the request of the petitioner to call upon the proposed witness to produce the other material as well, the learned Special Court observed that if the Writ Petitioner, as third respondent, seeks summoning of the document he can as well file a separate application for the said purpose to summon Sri Bhaskar to produce the document that he desires for reference in the L.G.C. 5. This Court discerns no error in the exercise of discretion by the learned Special Court, warranting review under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The grievance asserted by the petitioner in this Writ Petition does not deserve to be entertained on the principle deme non qurat de minimus lex (law does not deal with trifles). Petitioner is at liberty, as observed by the learned Special Court, to file a separate application to summon the said Bhaskar for production of whatever document he wants to produce. 6. On the above premise, the Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J _______________________________ G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY,J 07th March, 2011. Tsy