IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20845 of 2011 Md. Kalam, S/O-Md. Yasin Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02 19.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Neither petitioner is named in the first information report nor anything has been recovered from his conscious possession. It appears from perusal of the impugned order of learned Additional Sessions Judge that one looted motorcycle was recovered in Sakara P.S. Case No. 343 of 2010 but submission on behalf of the petitioner is that Annexure-2 reveals that the aforesaid recovered motorcycle does not belong to the present case and moreover, the said motorcycle has not been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, West Muzaffarpur in connection with Kurhani P.S. Case No. 114 of 2010. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)