^^ <g? [IGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATLBILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 4045 of2006 ianshidhar Bhoi, Aged about 20 years, S/o Shri Jogiram Bhoi, R/o Village SaSakliiya, Block & Tahsil: Lailiuiga, District: Raigarh (CG) 'V'ERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Tlie Secs-etary, Depaftment of PaticSiayat & Social Welfai-e, DKt Bhawaa, Raipur (CG) 2. Tiie Dy. Director/Prescribed Authority, Paiichavat & Social Welfare, District Raigarh, Durg (CG) 3. Tiie Chief Executive Officer, Jaapad Pasichayat, District; Raigarh (CG) 4. Tlie Sarpaacli, Grain Panehayat Saialdiiya, Block & Tahsil: Lailunga, District: Raigarh (CG) WSIT PETITION LTN®ERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTmjTION OF E\7DIA SB: Hon'bte SIiri Satish K. Asmhotri, J. Present: Shri C.Jayant K. Rao, Advocate tbr the petitioner. Sliri AjayDw'ivedi, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondentNo. 1 aiid2. Shri Sunil Otwani. Advocate for resuondent No. 4. 1. Leanied (Passed oa 04ttt day of January, 2008) appeariiig for the petitioner submits that fhe petitioner has 3. been appointed as Panchayat Secretar}7 by order dated 12.7.2005 (Annexure P/2) passed by the competent authority i.e. the respondent No. 2. Despite the order, ths Gram Panchayat Salayiiya, Block Lailunga, is not penriitting the petitioner to perfonn the duty ofPanchayat Secretaty aiid furtlierthe petitioner is not being given his salar}'. Be that as it may, since the order has been passed by the respoadent No. 2, it is the responsibility oftfae respondent No. 2 to ensure that his order is complied vvith in its letter and spirit. Accordingly, the respondent No. 2 is directed to look into the matter and to ensurs compliance ofthe order dated 12.7.2005 (.^nnexia'e P/2). In view ofthe foregoing, this petitioa stands disposed of. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge A-nit