1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 2142/2011 (Balkisan B. Agrawal VERSUS State of Mah. & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri M.A. Vaishnav, counsel for the petitioner. Shri D.B. Patel, A.G.P. for the R-State. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : MAY 2 , 2011 . Heard. It appears that the stay application filed by the petitioner before the Deputy Commissioner (Supply) along with the appeal challenging the order passed by the District Supply Officer came to be rejected by the impugned order dated 29.03.2011. Shri Vaishnav, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the petitioner would withdraw the writ petition in case the respondent no.2 is directed to decide the appeal filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks. Considering the fact that the stay application filed by the petitioner has been rejected by the Deputy Commissioner (Supply), it would be necessary to direct the respondent no.2 to decide the appeal filed by the petitioner as early as possible. The respondent no.2 is, therefore, directed to decide the appeal within a period of six weeks from the date of this order. 2 In view of the aforesaid direction, the learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with a direction to the respondent no.2 to decide the appeal within a period of six weeks from the date of this order. No order as to costs. JUDGE APTE