IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8433 of 2010 NIRAJ CHANDRAYAVI S/O SHRI NAWAL KISHORE PRASAD, R/O 104, PRANAV MANSION, KADAMKUAN, P.S. KADAMKUAN DISTT. PATNA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 01.12.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 30.1.2010 passed by A.D.J. XIII, Patna in Cr. Revision No. 761/09 by which he has affirmed the order dated 18.7.2009 passed by Judicial Magistrate, Patna in Complaint Case No. 1025 (C) of 2009. The petitioner who is the complainant of the aforesaid complaint is aggrieved by the order of dismissal of his complaint. The Magistrate had dismissed the complaint on the ground that there was only oral evidence with regard to the property dispute and the clinching documents which was required was not produced by the complainant. The Magistrate further held that in the facts of the case a civil dispute was made out. The Revisional Court also dismissed the revision on the ground that the document which was required had not been filed in the court below. It has been submitted that the complainant had filed some documents and, therefore, it was wrong to say that no documents was filed. Further submission is that in the facts of the case Section 503 I.P.C. is made out. However, on going through of the order impugned I find that the document which had been required by the court to clinch the issue had not been produced by the complainant and the court below was right in dismissing the complaint on account of non production of the documents. In my view in the facts of the case no offence under Section 503 I.P.C. is made out. In view of such, the application is dismissed. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )