BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Criminal Jurisdiction) Monday, the First day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.9627 of 2011 SAROJA :PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.2 -Vs- THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, E2, MATHICHIYAM POLICE STTION, MADURAI DIST. CR.NO 970 OF 2011 :RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. B.VINOTHKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. ORDER:The Court Made the following order:- The petitioner is arrayed as A2 and she was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 22.06.2011 for the alleged offences punishable under sections 366 and 376 r/w 120(b) of IPC in Crime No.970 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for enlargement on bail. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.side) would submit that the alleged occurrence has been taken place on 11.06.2011 and the accused was arrested on 22.6.2011 and the case has been registered under sections 366 and 376 r/w 120(b) of IPC and investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4.Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and considering the fact that the petitioner is none other than the mother of the first accused and she instigated her son to abduct the victim girl since the offence is against woman and investigation is in earlier stage, this application deserves to be dismissed and hereby the application is dismissed sd/- 01/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO: 1.The Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 2.The Inspector of Police, E-2, Mathichiyam Police Station, Madurai District. RP/04.08.2011/1P/3C. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9627 of 2011 Date :01/08/2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/