IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 6TH DECEMBER 2007 / 15TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 WA.No. 1501 of 2006(A) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.24314/2005 Dated 30/11/2005 .................... APPELLANT: 3RD PARTY: --------------------- RAJENDRA BABU T.S., KALAROORATHU, EDACKADU P.O., KADAMPANADU, KOLLAM-691 552. BY ADV. SRI.S.JAYAKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECREATARY, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR, SCHEDULED CASTE/SCHEDULED TRIBES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. SHELVARAJAN K.P., NADUVILAKUNNATH HOUSE, CHELANNUR P.O., KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.SREEDHARAN NAIR SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR SRI.ALEXANDER THOMAS,SC,KPSC GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BENNY GERVASIZ THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JJ. --------------------------------- W.A.No.1501 OF 2006 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 6th day of December, 2007 JUDGMENT Radhakrishnan, J. This appeal is preferred with leave stating that this court was not justified in recording the submission of the PSC that appellant could have been called for interview and depending upon his performance in the written test and interview, he can also be included in the rank list. Learned counsel for the PSC submitted that before this court disposed of the writ petition, PSC by notification dated 19/11/2005 corrected the mistake and petitioner was also called for interview and written test and later included in the ranked list. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant has received Annexure 1 show cause notice seeking his remarks on the proposed cancellation of his advice. Appellant has preferred objection to Annexure 1. Writ Appeal is disposed of leaving it open to the PSC to pass appropriate orders taking note of the objection of the appellant and after hearing the appellant within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, untrammelled by the observation made in the impugned judgment. K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN JUDGE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE sv.