THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI W.P.No.19992 of 2011 Between: Khadi Bandar, rep. by its Manager N.V.V. Satyanarayana PETITIONER And 1. Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. By its Secretary Endowments Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, and others. RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioners: Sri G. Simhadri Counsel for the respondents 1 & 2: G.P. for Endowments Counsel for the respondents 3 & 4: Sri V.T.M. Prasad Court made the following ORDER: Though the petitioner has assailed the orders dated 23.04.2011 in O.A.No.2206 of 2010 on the file of the A.P. Endowments Tribunal, Hyderabad allowing the O.A. for eviction of the petitioner from the subject premises, the learned counsel Sri G. Simhadri appearing for the petitioner submits that without going into the merits of the case, the petitioner be permitted three months time to vacate and handover the possession to the respondents. In view of the said submission and with the consent of both the counsel this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage. The brief facts are that the petitioner was a tenant of shop No.6 in a shopping complex belonging to Sri Mantripragadavari Choultry, Amalapuram. Even after the expiry of lease the petitioner continued to remain in occupation of the shop without obtaining extension of lease. Therefore, the respondents 2 and 3 herein invoked the provisions of Section 83 of the A.P. Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 for eviction of the petitioner, which ultimately culminated in the impugned order. As stated above, the said order is not under challenge on merits. The only request made is that the petitioner may be granted reasonable time of three months for vacating the premises. It is true that the Tribunal while passing the order of eviction has granted a months’ time to vacate the premises. Having regard to the nature of business and the length of tenancy ever since 1975, I am of the view that the petitioner is entitled to grant reasonable time so as to enable him to secure alternative accommodation. The learned Standing Counsel Sri V.T.M. Prasad submits that the petitioners have submitted an undertaking before the 2nd respondent-Assistant Commissioner, Endowments that they would handover the possession on or before 31.08.2011. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in spite of the best efforts made by the petitioner to secure alternative accommodation before the said date he could not succeed in his efforts. In view of the aforesaid stand the following order is passed. 1. The petitioner shall be permitted to be in occupation of the subject shop for a period of three months i.e., up to 31.11.2011. 2. He shall vacate the premises without any let or hindrance on or before 31.11.2011. 3. The petitioner shall continue to pay the rents without any default. 4. He shall file an undertaking before the 2nd respondent-Assistant Commissioner, Endowments Department, incorporating the aforesaid conditions within a period of one weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. In committing any default this order stands vacated. Save the extension of time as above, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. _________________ NOUSHAD ALI, J. 23rd August, 2011. Js.