CWP No.654 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.654 of 2011 Date of decision: 14.09.2011 Ram Sarup ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Mohd. Yousaf, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Jaswinder Singh, DAG, Punjab. Mr. B.S. Saini, Advocate, for respondent No.5. Mr. D.R. Punia, Advocate, for respondent No.6. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Present petition is filed for issuance of writ in nature of mandamus directing respondents No.2 to 5 to get the encroachment removed of respondent No.6, who is said to be in illegal possession of Panchayat land and for further direction to respondent No.2 to initiate proceedings under Section 216 of the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 against respondent No.5 for not performing his duties imposed by law. Learned counsel appearing for respondents No.5 and 6 have stated that eviction proceedings have already been initiated against respondent No.6 under Section 7 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, which is pending disposal. Mr. Jaswinder Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, appearing for respondents No.1 to 4, has fairly stated that even CWP No.654 of 2011 2 otherwise decision shall be taken on representation (Annexure P-3) within 60 days from today and necessary action shall be taken if so required. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondents, present petition stands disposed of. (Alok Singh) Judge September 14, 2011 R.S.