1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2994 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.1913 OF 2009 Pratik Textiles Plaintiff versus Jyoti N. Ledwani Defendant Mr.Vaishnawa i/by Bharat Vaishnawa & Co. for plaintiff. Mr.Mehul Rathod i/by Ashok M. Saraogi for defendant. CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 5th January 2011 PC : 1. This Notice of Motion is taken by the plaintiff under Order XXXVIII, Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. An ad-interim application was made on behalf of the plaintiff when the learned advocate for the defendant made a statement that the defendant is not going to create any third party rights or part with possession in respect of the suit premises. The statement was accepted by this Court. The learned advocate for the defendant now states on instructions that pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit, the defendant will not create any third party rights or part with possession of the suit premises. The statement is accepted. Needless to add that the statement made on behalf of the defendants is without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties to the suit. In view thereof, no further orders are required to be passed in the Notice of Motion. The Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.)