I ‘ 7 WV m THE HxGH COURT OF MAMA mmw AT JQBNJ?UI€"‘- $2316 OF 1987 PEI‘Iggggjgi Con (AITUC) struction , Ehil Empl ai .::" 'oy egg. Union Di stumrgtmP. V mam “ my M‘P,No.__ V ERSUS’V g 1. Industrial Court of FRP» 1néore. S 2. Limit Hindustan eé, Bhil St eel’ 8i t Cbnstruc’ti I ‘ wwRgxT.;;Q§mggg§&aggz or ‘5 ’ XI—'HC~22 2 1 . 1 2 . 2005 None for the peu'tioner. None for the mspondcn The matter was again w t was passed over. On both c mpresentationtwas made onl Accoxdingly, the writ procuton. sei 1S ‘raken up for hearing today amr, ’- ocasions, none appeamd nor any )ehalf of the petiu'oner. fi11'on is dismissed for want of r satish K- Agmhotn ‘ Judge [11%W i