IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 328 of 2010. Date of Decision : August 1, 2011 Sh. Amar Chand … Petitioner Versus Sh. R. D. Dhiman … Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R. K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J. K. Verma, Dy. A.G. for the respondent/ contemnor. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner appears to have certain grievance with regard to the order passed by the respondent. According to the petitioner same is in violation of the spirit of the judgment. Having gone through the detailed reply filed by the respondent we do not find any contemptuous conduct on the part of the respondent so as to proceed against the respondent under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act. It appears that the petitioner’s grievance is with regard to the order of respondent. That the petitioner has to pursue in appropriate proceedings. In contempt proceedings, 2 petitioner cannot expect to get order on merits after varying or setting aside the order already passed. Therefore, reserving the liberty to the petitioner to pursue his grievance in appropriate proceedings, the COPC is dismissed. Rule discharged. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. August 1, 2011 (PK/C)