i PETITlidNER / Rakhiram Kamwar, S/o Shri M.S. Kanwar, aged about 43 years, Lab Tech. Gram ia Bhariti Vidyapith Hardi Bazar, Korba (3C.G.) I g VERSUS 1. State of ChhattiSgarh , Through Secretary, Department ofHigher Education, DKS Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) \ eRESPOND’ENTs 2. /Director, Higher Education, Directore ’ Raipur (C.G.) w ,, 33/ Shashtri Shikshan Samiti, Through its Secretary,Gramya Bharti Vidyapith (Mahavidyalaya) Hardi' Bazar, Korba . (C.G.) 1 , ' at w u R TINKER DIWAKE Is p! ' a Hon’BLm‘sl-ImausAlcE .P.§S!NO. 57201' _. _ ‘,_:va‘1_<hix_af i _Rm_ Kgnwar 1Ve'fsu r mimm‘s 1‘sta"te“6.., ‘ Shn Neera] Choubey, counsel for the petmon S 2 hn V V S Moorthy, Dy A G for the State/resps 1 & ' ' W 9710 534 \ my fbG& bmm er eutloner and smxlarly paced m y Eds craio g n te ay nnsswn 1s alread under co n for tn iant ad of 'let 6th P h enhancr make a &csh representaho wou dec1 accordance Wlth la ccoxdmgly, the etltmner 1s p rmltted to mraw petmon w1th the afoxesal‘dshberty In the eventuahty of iilmg sh reresentatlon by the petmon r before the respondcn NO 1 W1th1n a enod o one mon 1 the date of Iecelt o copy of thJs order, 1t 1s expected mm the sal autonnes t pass appropnate order as expedmously as passable preeral mfhm a enod of four months mm the date of 1s recelp as not expressed an pmlon on ments of the case and the authonty conceme ould be at hbenv to demde the same smctly 1n accoxdanc - ¥dcd 1n w I A p thd thw { V a L p t p f th m p f d h o fby l p t t 5 I'tdis’ made clear that this Court h y o d w e % Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge p l pe and the mme ld be ' ;$5 ‘