In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. CR No.1027 of 2011 (O&M) Decided on 21.4.2011. Sanjay Khan -- Petitioner vs. Nirmal Singh and others --Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.G.N.Malik,Advocate,for the petitioner Mr.Vijay Sharma,Advocate, for respondent No.1. Rakesh Kumar Jain, J, (Oral) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would not argue the case on merit if eventually, the Court grants him time to vacate the demised premises. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is in possession of the demised premises for the last many years and prayed for a period of one year to vacate the demised premises in order to make some alternate arrangement. Learned counsel for respondent No.1, however, submits that some reasonable time may be granted to the petitioner as period of one year is too long as it is required by the landlord for his own use and occupation. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, CR No. 1027 of 2011 (O&M) -2- the petitioner is granted nine months' time to vacate the demised premises by January 21,2012 subject to his filing an undertaking by way of an affidavit before the learned Rent Controller within a period of 15 days to vacate the same and also by clearing all the arrears of rent due, if any. The tenant shall also make payment of rent of the ensuing months till he retains possession. It is also made clear that in case of violation of any of the undertakings to be given by him in pursuance of this order then he would be liable for contempt under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act,1971. With these observations, this revision petition stands disposed of. 21.4.2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge