IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 6862 of 1988. Date of Decision : 04.10.2010. Lachhman Singh ......Petitioner Versus Addl. Director Consolidation of Holdings Punjab at Jalandhar and others . .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. Viney Saini, Advocate, for Mr. G.S.Nagra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. O.P.Dabla, DAG, Punjab, for the respondent-State Mr. Amandeep Saini, Advocate, for Mr. M.L.Saini, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 2 and 4. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) By filing this writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, Lachhman Singh has impugned the order dated February 28th, 1985 (Annexure P/3), passed by respondent No.1, whereby, application under Section 42 of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, filed by Malkiat Singh and others (respondent Nos.2 to 4), was accepted. 2. The Additional Director, respondent No.1 allowed the passage to the parties taking into consideration the field-map by observing as under :- “.. The sketch map clarifies the position, Killa No. 189/1 owned by the petitioners has been allotted separately and is situated towards the south of Killa Nos. owned by the respondents and the path is situated on the northern side. If a path is carved for killa No. 189/1, the whole of the land comprised in their khasra number will be covered under the path. The respondents own land next to the main block of the petitioners. So this land comprised in Kh.No. 189/1 can better be attached with the main block of the petitioners and Kh.No. 189/1 should be allotted to the respondents. Both the parties will be benefited by this change.” 3. A perusal of the order makes it clear that the passage provided was necessary and as such there is no ground to interfere in the order (Annexure P/3). 4. Dismissed. (NAWAB SINGH) JUDGE 4.10.2010 som