H!$H CQUR? OF €HHAYT§$GARH BILA$PUR @w‘w Writ Pe€§iion ($} No. 7‘3 6% of 2m}? Petitioner Ku. Mita Karan, Bra. Shri JP. Karan, age abaut 50 years, Le¢turer, Govt. Giris Hr. Sec. $choci, Baikuntpur, Dist: — Koria (CG). Versus Respondents 1) State Govt. cf Chhamsgarh, throuah the Secretaw. Educatian & Triba! Eelfare Department D.K.$. Bhawan. Raipur (CG). 2) District Institute of Educaticn and Twining, Disttw Karia (CG). J \‘ (Writ Petition umfer Ariicie 226 of the Canstimtion of ind§a) SB: Hon’bie Mr. Satish K. #tgnihotri, J. Present: 8hr? Ajay Shriva$tava, ccju’r'rsét fbf’ikiéiiéiifiéfr'iéffww’ Shri AS. Kacchawaha, Gevt. Advecate for the State. ORAL GRDER £Passed on 3m December, 299?} Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner as we" as for the State/respondents jointiy submit %hat the facts and question of iaw invoived in the present wht petitionore squarety covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar £haradwaj Vs. Municipai <3orporation, Burg am! another‘ 2) Leamed counsei appearing f0! the petitioner has pointed out the oiromat dateo 13-9-19?4 {Annexure Pit), whete under according to the petitioner, the petitioner, who had obtained E.Ed., examination oertificate before appointment, is aiso entitled to two advance inctements. The respondents/State, while eonsidering the cases of the petitioners, shaii grant the reiief, in accordance with the circuiar {some}. 1 20% (H) Mme-CG 96 3} For tha afarementioned reasons, ihe writ petmon is disposed 6f ir. ierms of the decision of this Com in tm matter of Yashwant Kumar Eharadwaj (supra), subject t6 verificaiion of the fact as to whet%1er ihe peiitioner has acquired B.Ed., ceftiiicaie at her awn expensa" as per the cimuiars ciaied 24-12-19S8 and 13-1999 and wither whether she has iaeen paid two advance increments or net. No order as to casts Sdl— . Satish K. Agnihotrl Judge