IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.20455 of 2010 MANOJ MAHTO son of Harihar Mahto Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 19.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 304-B, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner, who is the husband of the deceased, has not been named in the First Information Report but subsequently he was implicated being the husband even though there is material to suggest that the petitioner was in Delhi at the relevant time, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar, in connection with Brahmpur P.S. case no.143 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner,(ii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iv)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)