IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9617 of 2009 DR.NESAR AHMAD son of Late Abdul Hafiz, resident of village- Baghi, P.S.- Lauriya, District- West Chamapran. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2. The Principal Secretary, Health Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3. The Accountant General, Bihar, Veer Chand Patel Path, Patna 4. The Deputy Secretary, Department of Health, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 5. The Civil Surgeon, District Sitamarhi, Bihar. ----------- 2 12.08.2009 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State and the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to payment of retiral dues. It is submitted that initially petitioner was allowed provisional pension allegedly on the ground that there was some audit objections while he was in service. According to the petitioner, the alleged audit objection is of the year 1985. It is further submitted that subsequently the respondents issued an order vide memo no. 2012 dated 18th December, 2008 (Annexure-2) whereby the balance ten per cent of the pension and gratuity have been sanctioned, however on condition that in case in future on account of the alleged audit objection if any punishment is imposed upon the petitioner, the present order shall accordingly be modified. The petitioner is being kept in such a situation without any valid justification as till 2 date no final decision has been taken on the said alleged audit objections and communicated to the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that in case petitioner files a representation stating the specific claims said to be outstanding, the same would be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the grievances, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.2 giving specific details of his claims. In this view of the matter, in case such representation along with the certified copy of the present order is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today, the above respondent shall consider the grievances of the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances raised in the representation could be redressed without delay. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)