IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39709 of 2008 VIJAY SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.10.2008 Heard Dr. Amarendra Kumar, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr. D. Mehta, learned A.P.P. The case is under various sections of the Arms Act. The recovery is said to be of a country made loaded pistol as also of two cartridges. The contention is that the informant of the case was asked to pay up the price of milk and that annoyed him. As such, the petitioner, who was supplying milk to him, has been falsely implicated. The Court is not influenced much by the argument by story of false implication. Regard being had to the recovery of country made pistol and two cartridges, I am not inclined to direct release of the petitioner on bail. The petition is dismissed. However, if the trial is not concluded within a period of one year from the date of remand of the petitioner in Maranchi P.S. case no.7 of 2008, the petitioner could be enlarged on bail by the court below, i.e., C.J.M., Barh, itself on execution of bond to its own satisfaction. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )