IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 5065 of 2005 Between: 1 T. Hussain Ahmed S/o. Madar Saheb, Muslim Educational Assosication, Regn.No. 10/60, Oriental Aided Arabic High School, Urvakonda, Anantapaur District. 2 Syed Azmatullah Hussaini S/o. Syed Hussain, Peera Arabic High School, Urvakonda, Anantapur District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Commissioner & Director of School Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 2 The Regional Director of School Education, Cuddapah, Cuddapah District. 3 The District Educational Officer, Anantapur, Anantapur District. 4 State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, School Education, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 5 Silar Sarmas Vali S/o. S. Shaik Shah Vali 1st Ward, Near Janda Makan, Urvakonda, Anantapur District. 6 D.B. Zeelan S/o. Baba Saheb Arabic High School, C.V.V.Nagar, Near Gavi Matam, Urvakonda, Anantapur District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order, or direction, more in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the proceedings proceedings Rc.No. 1116/Se/2001 dt. 5-2-2003 and proceedings Rc.No. 1116/Se/2001 dt. 5-3-2003 issued by the 1st respondent as arbitrary, illegal void and without jurisdiction apart from violating the principles of natural justice and set aside the same and issue consequential directions, directing the official respondents to allow the 2nd petitioner to continue as Correspondent of Arabic High School in pursunace of the proceedings Rc.No. 1116/S3/2001 dt. 20-2-2002 issued by the 1st respondent and be pleased to pass such other order or orders as deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.G.ELISHA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 5065 OF 2005 ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and thereby the writ petition has become infructuous. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _____________________________ Justice B.Seshasayana Reddy 10th June, 2009. KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 5065 OF 2005 10th June, 2009.