Crl. Misc. No.M-19766 of 2011 Harpreet Singh Versus State of Punjab PRESENT Mr.Anil Chawla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Kiratpal Singh Sidhu, DAG., Punjab. Mr.Veneet Sharma, Adv., for the complainant. The petitioner was found innocent but on having been summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C., and arrested on 27.05.2011, he seeks the concession of regular bail. Counsel for the complainant has vehemently opposed the application for bail contending that the petitioner has been attributed an injury on the right arm with dang besides he having fired from his gun in the air. After hearing the counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the complainant as well as the State counsel and I am of the opinion that the dual version has already cropped up with the factum of petitioner having been declared innocent earlier. The petitioner can be granted the concession of bail on account of said reasons as he seems to have not misused his liberty. The petition is allowed. It is ordered that the petitioner will be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE August 11, 2011. rka