IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH APRIL 2010 / 17TH CHAITHRA 1932 CRP.No. 191 of 2003() --------------------- CR.606/1977 of TALUK LAND BOARD, ERNAD .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S)/CLAIMANTS: ------------------------------- 1. M.P.AYISHUMA, KARUVATH ELAKODIKKAL, KUMMINIPARAMBU, KONDOTY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. K.E.KADEEJA, KARUVATH ELAKKODIKKAL, KUMMINIPARAMBU, KONDOTY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. KUNHIPATHUMMA, KARUVATH ELAKKODIKKAL, KUMMINIPARAMBU, KONDOTY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. K.E.SAFIA, KARUVATH ELEKKODIKKAL, KUMMINIPARAMBU, KONDOTY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 5. K.E.MAIMOONA, KARUVATH ELAKKODIKKAL, KUMMINIPARAMBU, KONDOTY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 6. K.E.SAJNA, KARUVATH ELAKKODIKKAL, KUMMINIPARAMBU, KONDOTY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 7. K.E.MUHAMMED KUNHUMON, KARUVATH ELAKKODIKKAL, KUMMINIPARAMBU, KONDOTY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM. CRP.191/03 3. TALUK LAND BOARD, ERNAD, REPRESENTED BY CHAIRMAN, DY.COLLECTOR (L.R), COLLECTORATE, MALAPPURAM. 4. VILLAGE OFFICER, PULIKKAL, VIA. KONDOTY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 5. PARAMMAL AMBADY KUNHAPPU HAJI, KONDOTY VILLAGE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.L.SAJEEVAN FOR R1 TO 4 THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ------------------------------- C.R.P.NO.191 OF 2003 () ----------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of April, 2010 O R D E R The learned counsel for the revision petitioners submits that the claim petitions filed by the petitioners have not been considered by the Taluk Land Board on its merits, but the revision happened to be filed since there was a direction in the order of the Taluk Land Board to take over possession of the land scheduled in the order by the revenue officials. Without prejudice to their right to pursue the claims raised in the petitions filed before the Taluk Land Board, the counsel seeks for closing of the revision. I am not expressing any opinion whether claim petitions filed by the petitioners are pending or not before the Taluk Land Board. Even if the claim petitions filed have not been considered, a revision at the instance of the petitioners against the impugned order of the Taluk Land Board is prima facie not entertainable. However, without prejudice to the right CRP.191/03 2 of the petitioners, if any, to take appropriate proceedings as provided by law to safeguard their interest, the revision is closed. S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN JUDGE prp S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ------------------------------- C.R.P.NO.191 OF 2003 () ----------------------------------- O R D E R 7th day of April, 2010 CRP.191/03 4