x3 WRIT l’ETITION {S) N0. 1630 6f29!}8 PETITIONERS : .1. Smt. Shanta Yadav. W/o Shri Ashok Ya(iav~ aged about 49 years, R/o Kumharpara, Jarhabhatha, Biiasyur, District Bilasgmr (CG) Smt. Ranjna Tiwari, W/o Shri Arvind Tiwari, aged a‘imut 24 years, U.D.T. R/o Kalash Awasiya Parisar, Lodhipara, Near Shiv Ghat, Bilaspur, District — Bilaspur (CG) 3. Ku. Mamta Garg, D/o Shri Rajkumar Garg, ageci about 46 vears, U.D.T. R/o Near MIG 1, Nehru Nagar, Bilaspur, District — Biiaspur (CG) 4H Smt. Shubha Agnihotri, W/o Shri Bharat Agnihoiri, aged about 54 years, Rfo 3-57, Indira Vihar Coloiay, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, District — Bilaspur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS : 1. State 0f Chhaitisgarh Through the Secretary, Department 0f School Education, D.K.Si Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2. Disn‘ict Education Oiiicar, Biiaspui', District Bila$pur (CG) 3. The Directar of Pubiic Instructions, Pension Baday Raipur (CG) WRIT FETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTlTUTiON OF INDIA 19 VERSES Hesent: SB: Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Shri Kunal Das, Advocate for the petitioners. Sim. Smita Ghai, Pane} Lawyer for the State / respondents. -' »w4. ORAL GRDER (Fassed on 14m day of March, 2008) Learned counsel agipearing for the petitioners as weii as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present Writ petition are squarely covered by the decision ofthis Coutt in the case of A.N.V.Satyanarayan & Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others {WP(S) No. 697/2007} decided on 97.02.2007. Le‘amed counsei appearing for the petitioner has pointed out the oircular dated 13.9.1974 Whereunder according to Mr. Das, the petitioners, g , iiKiH CG‘URT {3F CHHAri‘TISGARii AT EILASPUR - gQDJ Q[‘ , who had ebtaixled B.Ed Examination Certificates before appointment, are also eniitled to two advance increments. The said circuiar reads as under: anew em e gm ewm we arm em qe; e: W3, Wa/Wwoum&wwa?m ‘Wemi6ina‘aiiawgf%mmwma§ WEIRHE um amiaqago—memeeemamme %$méwmmmm mamm‘weotgammwmmiméaa {@T‘WW$§§§§H§WKWW€%£& $§§Ia$am€ma§mwg§mwumm§$ wWWWWW€iWuwa§W mewémeogioa$q§mw$me §§Twqmm§$eeeo1§§§aa§wm gmwo@mHWWW1?mff§aW ‘Wiaefwmfermeimmwamw Wmwawe,agwmm§§5gwm (W)éaw§'w§%ma1??$§rfema§wa§i%§§aw mmHWW€é$gwwa§W§W The resporidents/Siaie, whiEe considering the cases of the petitioners shaii grant the reiief, in accordance with tile circular (supra). ? For the aforementioned reasons, the wrii petition is disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the maiter of A.N.V.Satyanarayaii 85', O‘Lhers (supra), subject to verification of ihe fact as to whether the petiiioners have acquired B.Ed. certificate on their own expenses as per t. 1e circuiars dated 24.12. 1998 and 01 .03.1999 and further whether they have been paid two advarice increments or not. -// ._ \LI/ sd/_ L ' Satish K. Agnihotfi Judge i f gr, ‘2 a ar4. w ,