HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR l\, DIVISION BENCH: HON'BLE SHRI T.P.SHARMAAND HON'BLESHRI R.L.JHANWAR, JJ. APPELLANT (Complainant) Gr.M.P.No.07of2011 Vijay Kumar Sahu, S/o Late Sukhram Sahu, aged about 50 years, r/o Ekta Chowk, Dubey Colony Mova PS Mova (Pandri) Raipur Chattisgarh. VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh - Through - PS Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. 2. Preetam Singh Khanuja; s/o Sardar Niranjan Singh Khanuja, aged about 32 years. ' 3. Payal Singh Khanuja, w/o Preeta Sihgh Khanuja, aged about 28 years. Non applicants No. 1 and 2r/o Besitfes Sarkar Hotel, Narmada Para, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 378 (4) OF THE CRIIWtNAL PROCEDURE CODE FOR GRANT OF SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL FROMTHEJUDGMENTOFACQUITTALDATED 11.6.201 OPASSED BY THE SESSlONSJUDGE, RAJNANDGAON IN SESSIONS TRIAL N0.57/2009 ' NON-APPLICANTS Accused No.1 Accused No.2 ^'•' -,'.•t' Appearance: Mr, Abhijit Sarkar, counset for the appticant. Smt. Madhu Nisha Singh, P.L. forthe Stgte. ORDER (Passedon 13.01.2011) Ttie present petition ha&been fited after 116days of itp timitatiQn. 2. Heard on I.A.No.01 for condonation of delay in filing this Grimihal MisceKaneous Petition under Section.378 (4)of the Code of Criminal Proeedure, 1973 andalso onadmission. 2- ;K. r''Y <aw)<(^ 3. On due consideration, I.A.No.01 for condonation of delay in filing the petition is allowed and the delay of 116 days is condoned. 4. Judgment impugnedperused. 5. Sessions Judge, Rajnandgaon has acquitted the non-applicants No.2 & 3 in S.T.No.57/2009 vide judgment dated 11.06.2010 passed in sessions trial other than the complaint. In these circumstances, the petition under seGtion 378 (4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not maintainable. 6. Consequently, the petition is dismissed as not maintainable. Sd/-.'.: T.P.SUarma Judge ; Sd/- R.L. Jhanwar Judge A