IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3987 of 2008 Date of decision:06.03.2009. Manjit Singh ...Petitioner Versus Jarnail Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. D.S.Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner. None for the respondent. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. (ORAL) As per the report made by the Registry, notice issued to the respondent for 23.01.2009 had been served. However, none had entered appearance on 23.01.2009. None has entered appearance today as well. The order dated 30.07.2008 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court (Rajive Bhalla, J.), at the time of motion hearing, has been complied with and, in support of that averment, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record a certified copy of the order dated 28.08.2008 passed by learned Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Zira, which is taken on record. Apart therefrom, the learned counsel for the petitioner states at the bar, under instructions from the petitioner, that the property under reference shall not be alienated during the pendency of the civil suit before the learned Trial Court. He agrees that an intimation to that effect may be given to the learned Sub Registrar of the concerned area. In the light thereof, the petition shall stands allowed in the terms aforementioned. A copy of the order shall be forwarded to the Sub Registrar of the area where the property under attachment is located. Disposed of accordingly. March 06, 2009 (S.D.Anand) vinod Judge