IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13259 of 2009 Sheikh Sadique Ansari, son of Late Noor Ali Ansari, resident Of Village-Koiridih, Post Office-Naur, Via-Nabi Nagar, Police Station-Nabi Nagar, District-Aurangabad. ………Peititioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Director Agriculture, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Provident Fund Commissioner, Bihar, Patna. 4. The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi. 5. The District Magistrate, Sheohar. 6. The A.D.M.-cum-Controlling Officer of S.P.F., Sitamarhi. 7. The Inspectorcum-Incharge, District Agriculture Officer,Sheohar. 8. The Head Clerk, Sub-Division-cum-District Agriculture Office, Sheohar. 9. The Assistant Clerk, Sub-divisional-cum-District Agriculture Officer, Sheohar. 10. The Provident Fund Officer, Sitamarhi. 11. The Treasury Officer, Sitamarhi. …….Respondents. ----------- 2. 12. 10. 2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. It is submitted that,although, payment of G.P.F. has been sanctioned by the Department on 11th August, 2009, as per letter No. 3882, as contained in Annexure-1of the writ application and necessary sanction order was sent to the District Provident Fund Officer, Sitamarhi, but still petitioner has not receive his Provident Fund dues. Learned counsel for the State submits that in case petitioner files a representation stating details of his claim, the same shall be looked into as per law without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his pending claim, petitioner proposes to file a representation 2 before Respondent No. 10. In case, such representation is filed along with relevant documents in support of his claim as also certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks from today, Respondent No. 10 shall consider and dispose of the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of two months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievance of the petitioner with regard to sanction of G.P.F. could be redressed without delay. With the above observations/directions, the writ application stands disposed of. m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)