IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 10591 of 2011-J. Decided on: December 12, 2011. Kamal Sharma wife of Sh. Raj Kumar Sharma, resident of Chandhi Lodge, First Floor, Near Ayurvedic Hospital Chhota Shimla, Shimla-2, Tehsil & District Shimla, H.P, Presently working as Lecturer English (School) Cadre in Government Senior Secondary School Shakrah, District Shimla, H.P. ……….Petitioner. Versus 1. State of Himachal Pradesh through its Principal Secretary Education, to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-2. 2. Director of Secondary Education, Shimla, Tehsil & District Shimla, H.P. 3. Deputy Director of Secondary Education, Shimla, District Shimla, HP. ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr. Raju Ram Rahi, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The Writ Petition is filed with the following prayer: “(i) That a writ in the nature of mandamus may very kindly be issued, directing the respondents to grant the petitioner the benefit of the tenure services for the purpose of increments and the pay of the petitioner may kindly be fixed taking into account the tenure services of the petitioner for fixation of pay.” 2. According to the petitioner, the issue is covered in his favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP No. 4550 of 2010, Ravi Kumar vrs. State of H.P. & another. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. The petitioner submits that he would file appropriate representation furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for him to do so. As and when the same is made, the second respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts 2 and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the second respondent. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. December 12, 2011, ( Justice Dev Darshan Sud), (karan/vs) Judge.