IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 18694 of 2011. [O&M] Date of Decision: 01st December, 2011. Dalbir Singh Petitioner through Mr. Karan Singh, Advocate Versus Chief Information Commissioner, Haryana & Ors. Respondents through Mr. R.D.Sharma, DAG, Haryana. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The information regarding the marks obtained by the selected candidates in their academic qualifications and interview has bee denied to the petitioner only on the ground that the information sought is quite bulky. There appears to be no justification to deny the information on this ground. Suffice it to mention that if the records are bulky or compilation of the information is likely to take some time, the Information Officer might be well within his right to seek extension of time in supply the said information, expenses for which are obviously to be borne by the petitioner. That being so, the writ petition is allowed. The respondent – Commission is directed to supply the information to the petitioner at his expenses. Since compilation of the information is likely to take some time, it is directed that the information be supplied to him within three months from the date a certified copy of this order is received. Disposed of. Dasti. December 01, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE