IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16334 of 2008 1. HAMIDA BANO WIFE OF AAS MOHAMMAD 2. GHULAM MOHAMMAD SON OF AAS MOHAMMAD 3. AAS MOHAMMAD SON OF LATE DILJAN MOHAMMAD 4. LAL MOHAMMAD @ TENI SON OF AAS MOHAMMAD ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE SHEIKHPURA, P.S. NAUHATTA, DISTRICT ROHTAS. ... ... PETITIONERS. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. KANCHAN KUMARI SON OF/D/O RAMNARESH GUPTA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHADARA, P.S. NAUHATTA, DISTRICT ROHTAS. ... ... OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 3. 30.6.2010. Today again, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners either to press this petition or to make a prayer for adjournment. Yesterday also, none had appeared. However, the case was adjourned for a day with an indication that no further adjournment shall be granted. Four petitioners, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, have prayed for quashing of the order dated 14.1.2008 passed in Complaint Case No.305 of 2007 by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram. By the said order, the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of the offences under Sections 341, 380 and 440 of the Indian Penal Code and directed for issuance of summons to secure 2 Md.S. the attendance of the accused persons. I have perused the complaint petition as well as the impugned order of cognizance. I do not find any defect in the order of cognizance. Accordingly, the petition stands rejected. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)