.^•s-i e^fw-} CoratTi SHHATT! i^i-WS-y ^£.:^^»ia ^^.h^QS S T'M'! i^f~i^ SFI U) SUN!L ;B SIMHA i.r^. ^•igi'yo^^; of 201 Rh? inp^h R^nh^! An^rl si ^N--E ;^m^^<^i i i-/lAl^4? i^-'tx £~^\ff\^^9 ^=*. »*/ years, S/o Nand Kumar Bag'nel, iVi.LA. Resident of Bhiiai-3, Tahsii & Distt. Durg (C.G.) pnMnFhiT Union of india, iVlinistry of Road, Transport & Highv/ays, Transport ihawan, New Delhi c'- State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Departmsnt of Publsc Works (RA/D'), D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantraiaya, Raipur (CG) M/s. Dsc Vicon Ventures a company incorporated under the rtnrnri^ni.&*s S.^ ''Qr^?5 hsvfn^ if:i ^Tip^[ii-^S2 M^^,; i yoo, ncsviny ?i; reaistered office at C-6S, South E>dension, Part-li, New Deihi - 11004; 4. indeoendent Ena'neer (Nams not known$ C/0 The Secretary, DeDariment of Public VVorks, y Q ^-,1^^7!-^.i--s'..,;^ 0-3;ins'r /P' Cl \ u.i'x.s. svisraraisya, "(aipur (u.u.j ion Ursder Articles 228 ofthe Constitution of India Present: Shri Jitendra Paii, iearned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Bhishma Kinger, ieamed Standing Counsel for resoondent No.1. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, !eamed Go\i+. Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 4. Shri Praveen Das, learned counsel for respondsnt No.3. V The TOSiowing order of Raieev GuDta. C.J.: Court was passed bv ••^-.'.^^^'•T^t^y.^ ^?'^^'^ ''^^ 1 %£Sr '^ssy'^ .:^' *<£'..^'' Petitioner - Bhupesh Baghel has filed thls writ petltion styi as 'Pubiic Interest Litiaation' forthe follo»vin.qreliefs: "7.1 To kindiy cali for the. records from the respondents. ~o kindiv issue a •vrit of certiorari for quashment of the impugned notification dated 13/6/2006 and to kindiy issue a writ of mandamus against the respondents directing them to start coliecting toi! fee at Toli Piaza situated at Km.285/4 oniv afte' 7.2 a!! the iegal formalities would be compieted by them and without charaina at the enhanced raie. 7.3 To kindtv make suitabie orders and writs to dismantie/put to disuse the second to!i Dlaza constructed near km 308 with immediate sffect and 7.4 To kind'v make such other writs and directions that may be deemed flt and jusl." 2) After fiiing of the counter affldavits by the respondents, the petitioner sought tlme for fiiing rejoinder affidavit on 25.10.2007, 7n i' '?rin7 17 ni '7nns "^n ni '^nns '7R no onns. '?i n7 onns anri i&-^. \ • .^.uu< , ' i .'u i .i^uuo. -JU.U S .Z.UUO. ^-SJ.UZ..^,UUQ. ^, S .U/ .^.WO iSHLi 21.08.2008. jnsplte of grant of severa! opDortunities durina the period of iast about one ysar, the petitloner has faiied in fiiing th< rejoindsr affidavit. 3) About the same subject matter invoived in this wnt petition fiied as Pubiic interest Liiiaat'on. another Detition i.e. W.P. iP'U No.3564/2006 is siso pending for consideration whereln aii the respondsnts have fi!ed their counter aff'davits and the petitsoners aiso have filed their reioinder affidavit. 4) Jn this view of the matter, we are of the opinion that keeping this petition aiso pending for hearing about the same subject which is invoived in 'W'.P. (PIL) No. 3564/2006 is quife unnecessary. 5) We, therefore, deem it approDriate to ciose the present Detifion with the iibertv to the iearned counsel for the petitioner to make his submissions in W.P. (Pii-} No.3564/2006. Sd,/- ChiefJustice l/' Sdf- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge subbu