IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.9406 of 2009 Between: Erugadindla Bikshapathi ..... Petitioner AND The State of A.P., rep., by its Commissioner of Police Cyberabad, Hyderabad & others. .....Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri P. Naga Raju for Sri Nuthalapati Krishna Murthy Counsel for respondents 1&2: AGP for Home Counsel for respondent No.3: Sri Pottigari Sridhar Reddy The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.9406 of 2009 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction on the part of respondent Nos.1 and 2 in taking action on the application/complaint dated 04.02.2009, as arbitrary and illegal and direct respondent Nos.1 and 2 to take action on the complaint of the petitioner dated 04.02.2009 after calling for the records.” At the hearing, Sri P. Naga Raju representing Sri Nutalapati Krishna Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the Writ Petition has become infructuous. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.12293 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also dismissed. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 30.04.2011 ES