IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6873 of 2009 1. ANIRUDH KUMAR MAHTO,S/o late Badri Mahto 2. Sidhir Kumar,S/o Anirudh Kumar Mahto Both resident of village-Simari, P.S.-Vidyapati Nagar,Dist.-Samastipur. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Pramila Kumari Devi,W/o Sudhir Kumar,D/o Rajo Mahto,resident of village-Maniarpur, P.S.-Ghatho,Dist.-Samastipur. ----------- 02/ 01-04-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners, though petitioner no.1 is the father-in-law and petitioner no.2 is the husband. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, marriage was not solemnized as a natural arranged manner and forcibly petitioner no.2 was married against his will and only to pressurize, different allegations have been levelled but any violence in the nature of causing injury is missing. So, their arrest cannot be justified. I agree with the same. In case of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Complaint Case No.334 of 2005, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dalsingsarai, District-Samastipur, subject to the conditions as laid down under sub- section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )