1 182.11-apl IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 182 OF 2011 Shri Souren Chander Alimchandani. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and others. ... Respondents. A.H.H.Ponda with K.S.Aiyar for the applicant. Ms.Nisha Srinivasan for respondent Nos.2 and 3. Bharat Zaveri for respondent No.4. CORAM: B.R.GAVAI, J. DATED : 4th July 2011. P.C. : Finally, the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. The parties have agreed to settle their disputes as per the consent terms which are duly signed by the parties as well as their respective counsel. The same are taken on record and marked `X’ for identification. 2. It is, however, submitted on behalf of respondent Nos.2 to 4 that in pursuance of the orders passed by the Court of France they may be required to file sur-rejoinder. However it is stated that the settlement between the parties will not be affected by filing of such sur-rejoinder and the said respondents will abide the consent terms filed by the parties. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the applicant that even if a joint letter is tendered to the Court of France it would serve the purpose and it would not be necessary to file a sur-rejoinder. 2 182.11-apl 4. Learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4 submits that they have no objection for submitting a joint letter. 5. In that view of the matter no orders in that regard would be necessary. 6. As agreed between the parties, a payment at the instance of respondent Nos.2 to 4 as agreed and recorded in the earlier orders is being made to the applicant in presence of the Court. 7. In view of the agreement between the parties, the applicant does not press for the reliefs claimed in the application. Therefore, the application is disposed of in terms of the consent terms. The said consent terms be treated as part of this order. (B.R.GAVAI, J.)