. 5$? Misc. Petition No 9) I O . ‘ ¢ 1 . 1993. Patimoner :«- FAIZ MGHAI‘MAD Ulu OT“ S‘HPI IHGIIAI‘”“’ D Al‘v’IIN AGE} ABC‘UJ, ”$28 ynqrs , .Z/O Ccniihgent Dhily Iiqted ,As‘sistant. Pushh AIM? banyqptrw , Dulg w ” \ R10 gubhash Nagar, Near 'Gokul's .53ho Burg Tghsil and Di.stt.mrg {ma}. r .-'.) 1 . General Manager, kashu Ahar banyan‘bra, mfg (i‘vi.’P.) i 1 .2 . managing Director, Piul‘i. Sigte Gan-operative Marketing Federation ,. Ltd . v Head Gffice- Jahangirabgd Bhopal We gecretary , ‘lVl.P. State Ccwoperative Marke'tin Fed era-ti 0n LtG. . Office- J'ghangirapad ,Bhopal, iTlCL$ 2P6 M‘F 227 OT“ CONSI‘IWT‘TON, OF § TITH‘N UWDE‘ ¢ u . INSIDE; ' __MW *n . L‘ Oi" i$sue of writs in the mature of certiorari I n arms am; /9r an] ouhcm awroprl te W1 t 01“ d1r9cilon ‘50 unwrv ou-f: (he VL- Sal‘dS a p fg g %~§E£w§"1 $GijR? €315: =..%é§£§§f§% gig?“ J é: $1 ??§§€E§§1RR : E§§LIAE$F3§$F€ Wa'sgaci an 'im Febmang, 25W} The petitioner has filed this writ petition for regwarization of hie services on the post of Aesisiaht / Acosumtaht (how designated as Assistant Accounts Officer) with aii consequential benefits He has aiso prayed for affirming the order dared 10—04-2003 (Annexure P/6) by quashing the order dared 264342003 Annexure Pl? 2. Learned ooLinsei for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was Li appeinted as a deny-wager and in this petition he has prayed for regularization of hie services. Learned oouneel further submits that ti e petitioner may be permitted to approach the Competent Authority / respondent Not for consideration of his ease sympathetically. 3. in View of the above, it is directed that the petitioner may appear before the Competent Authority! respondent No.1 on 28322607 and if he so appears the Competent Authority / respondent No1 is directed to consider the case of the petitioner sympathetically! in accordance with law and circuiars, Hew’kaie $§1§i $ati§h K. Agwihmri d. W §§ Na 22533 of ii§§3 $e‘iiéiar4e? Faiz Mohammad Versus Reggonfmnm Genera! Manager. Pa$hu Aha? Sanyantra, Dung and ethers, Shn‘ HB. Agr vat Sr. Advccate with Shri Maniah AgrawaL ,AaxJacate for the peii‘tioner. Dy. XLK. shukla, Sr. Advaoate with Ms Rim Mishra, Advacaie f0; respcmdent Nu? Shri Abhiehek Sénha, counseé for respondentS No. 2 & 3. G R i} E R 4. Accordingly} the writ petiti n stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Sdl- V ‘ x Satish K. Agnihotri ; Judge