IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.7647 of 2009 RAM NANDAN PRASAD @ LAKHAN LAL son of late Ram Chandra Prasad, resident of Mohalla- Rikabganj, P.S. Tekari, District-Gaya ...Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR & 2. Arbind Kumar son of Late Laxmi Narain Singh, resident of Mohalla- Rikabganj, Ward No. 6P.S. Tekari, District-Gaya … Opposite Parties ----------- For the petitioner : None For the OP No.2 : None For the State of Bihar : Mrs. Anuradha Kumar, APP ------------- 3/ 29.07.2010 The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 16.10.2008 by which the Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Gaya, has taken cognizance in Tekari P.S. Case No.27 of 2008 dated 8.2.2008 for the offence under sections 384, 385 and 389 Indian Penal Code. Notices were issued to the opposite party no.2 by order dated 22.4.2010, but today neither the petitioner nor the counsel for the opposite party no.2 is present in the court. In absence of the counsel for the parties, this application is being disposed of merits. The case of the informant is that after an agreement with TATA INDICOM for installation of a Tower on the vacant land of his house the accused persons demanded extortion and hampered the progress of his work on account of which he had to pay Rs.25,000/- to him. Thereafter, the accused persons made further demand and also threatened of dire consequences. After investigation, the police submitted chargesheet in the matter for the offence under sections 384, - 2 - 385 and 389 Indian Penal Code Considering that the petitioner seeks quashing of the order of cognizance on facts in support of which he has brought certain documents on record before this court, I am not inclined to consider the same at this stage. This application is, therefore, dismissed. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)