1 wp134.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No. 134 of 2011 Shriram Babanrao Satpute & ors. ...Petitioners v/s. Shivram Laxman Ranpise & ors. ...Respondents through LRs Chandrabhaga S. Ranpise Mr. S.N. Chandrachood for the petitioners. Mr. V.P. Patankar for the respondents. CORAM:- B.R. GAVAI, J DATED :- FEBRUARY 14, 2011. P.C. By way of present Petition, the Petitioner challenges the order dated 16th November, 2010 vide which the Application filed by the present Petitioner for appointment of Court Commissioner to find out as to whether alleged deed of compromise dated 15th December, 1990 has been acted upon or not. The Petitioner also prays for marking the consent terms dated 15th December, 1979 as properly proved. 2 wp134.11.sxw 2. Insofar as the second contention of the Petitioner is concerned, the document cannot be directed to be treated as proved by this Court sitting in extraordinary jurisdiction of Article 227 without the parties proving the same in accordance with law. Insofar as first contention is concerned, the Learned Trial Court has found that Court Commissioner cannot be appointed for collecting evidence in support of contentions raised by the parties. 3. No perversity could be noticed in the impugned order. Rejected. (B.R. GAVAI, J)