1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2278 OF 2005 Shri Keshav Shankar Shinde & Anr. . . .. Petitioner. vs. Shri Raghunath Shankar Shinde & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr. Umesh Mankapure for petitioner. CORAM : S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATE : 12th December, 2005. P.C.: . Heard the petitioner. The respondents are served by private notice as per the directions of the Court. Inspite of the same, none appears for the respondents. The impugned order passed by the Additional Commissioner, Pune Division, Pune dated 24.10.2002 which is under challenge is ex-facie erroneous as it gives no reasoning of any nature whatsoever while dismissing the revision application. In that light of the matter, the impugned order dated 24.10.2002 is quashed and set aside. The revision application before the 2 Additional Commissioner being RTS/SGL/737/2002 is restored and the Additional Commissioner is directed to dispose of the said revision application expeditiously and in any event on or before 31.3.2006. The Additional Commissioner is also directed to give notice to either side before passing any final order on the said revision application. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner undertakes to file affidavit of service within a period of one week from today. Petition disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs.