C.W.P No. 6882 of 2007 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.M No.22498 of 2008 and C.W.P No. 6882 of 2007 Date of decision : December 10, 2008 Harbans Singh, ...... Petitioner through Mr.H.S.Sethi, Advocate v. State of Punjab and others, ...... Respondents through Mr.Anil Sharma, Sr.DAG Punjab CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) This application has been filed to dispose of the writ petition by directing the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner in the same terms as decided in the order dated 14.6.2007 (Annexure A-1). Counsel for the respondents is not in a position to deny the existence of the order, Annexure A-1. He, however, states that the said order was qualified and it was mentioned that the same had been passed in the peculiar circumstances of that case. Counsel for the petitioner states that circumstances of the present petitioner are identical to that of the case mentioned in Annexure A- 1. In the circumstances, this application is allowed and the writ C.W.P No. 6882 of 2007 ::2:: petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner by passing a speaking order within three months of the receipt of a certified copy of this order. The respondents would keep in mind the fact that apart from this case, there are atleast six cases on the record of this case where persons, who do not belong to the feeder cadre, have been promoted. ( AJAY TEWARI ) December 10 , 2008. JUDGE `kk'