CWP No. 9832 of 2008 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 9832of 2008 Date of decision 10 .2.2010 Satpal Yadav ... Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ... Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr.Rakesh Gupta ,Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.2 1.To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 2.Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? M.M.KUMAR, J. The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 19.9.2007 (P.14) passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh in OA No. 1090 HR-2005. After holding a regular departmental enquiry gross mis-conduct on the part of the petitioner was proved and his services were terminated. Thereafter his appeal was also dismissed on 31.3.2004. The Tribunal set aside the order of his termination and reinstated him in service. However, the benefit of back wages till the date of reinstatement was declined but his previous service has been permitted to be tagged with future service for all purposes including seniority and pay fixation etc. Feeling aggrieved by the later portion of the order, the petitioner has approached this Court. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we are of the considered view that no interference in the order of the Tribunal would be warranted. The Tribunal has taken correct view by declining the payment of CWP No. 9832 of 2008 2 back wages but the service has been permitted to be counted for all purposes including seniority and pay fixation etc. Accordingly, the writ petition fails and the same is dismissed. (M.M.Kumar) Judge (Jitendra Chauhan) 10.2.2010 Judge okg