IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 7TH JULY 2009 / 16TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 19019 of 2009(O) --------------------------------------- OS.NO.436/2003 OF PRL.SUB COURT,TRIVANDRUM. .................... PETITIONER: ------------------- B. LALITHA BAI, W/O. LATE NAGENDRAN NAIR, T.C.28/1613, RAVATHI, SREEKANTESWARAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. MR. G.SUDHEER (KARAKONAM). RESPONDENT: ---------------------- ADARSH.D, S/O. DIVAKARAN PILLAI, T.C.41/249 (5), MANACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/07/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. S.S. SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 19019 OF 2009 O ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 7th day of July, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is the judgment debtor in E.P.No.537/08 in O.S.No.436/03 before the Sub Court, Thiruvananthapuram. The decree was passed in a suit for money, and the respondent is the decree holder. The petitioner/judgment debtor remained absent, and an exparte decree was passed. He moved an application for setting aside the decree but that was dismissed for default. Another application moved to restore the application dismissed for default is pending enquiry. On a previous occasion the petitioner has approached this court seeking direction/orders for early disposal of Ext.P6 application. That writ petition was disposed by Ext.P8 judgment directing him to move the Sub Court for expeditious disposal of the application after service of notice. Now the decree holder is taking hasty steps for executing the decree is the grievance espoused to seek directions from this court to the Sub Court, Thiruvananthapuram for expeditious disposal of Ext.P6 application. WPC.19019/09 : 2 : After having heard the counsel and taking note of Ext.P8 judgment rendered by this court in the previous writ petition for the very same relief, I find the petitioner has to approach the Sub Court and seek for emergent consideration of Ext.P6 application. Reserving the right of the petitioner to do so, the writ petition is closed. sd/- (S.S. SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. to Judge