1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL ِAPPLICATION NO. 1996 OF 2010 Uttam Maroti Savant and others ..APPLICANTS -VERSUS- The State of Maharashtra and another ..RESPONDENTS ......... Mr. S.G. Dargad, advocate for applicants. Mrs. B.R. Khekale, A.P.P. for respondent no.1 Mr. P.K. Lakhotiya, advocate for respondent no.2. ........ (CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) DATE : 14 th September, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned Advocates. They submit that the matter is amicably settled, and therefore, the F.I.R. may be quashed. The respondent no.2 had filed affidavit. Since the offence falls within the provisions of Section 3(1)(x) of the S.C. and S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, the same is not compoundable, and therefore, the request is rejected. The application is disposed of accordingly. (V.R.KINGAONKAR) JUDGE gas/cri1996.10