BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Fourth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN CRL OP(MD) No.12398 of 2011 A.KARNAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.10 A.S.CHINNU ...PETITIONER/INTERVENER Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, (LAND GRABBING SPECIAL WING), THENI, THENI DISTRICT CRIME NO.57 OF 2011. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. VEERA KATHIRAVAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.C.RAMESH, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,(Crl.Side) For Intervener : MR.G.R.SWAMINATHAN, ADVOCATE, PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 465, 468, 471, 420, 447, 294 (b) and 506 (ii) IPC in Crime No.57 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has no way connected in this crime. He got Power of Attorney from A.1 to A.4 and as per the First Information Report, A.1 to A.7 created the forged document and also the same dispute was pending before the civil forum between defacto complainant and A.1 to A.7. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is only a bonafide power of Agent and he does not commit any offence. He further submitted that the petitioner will not abscond or evade any due process of law and he never tamper with the witnesses and hence, he has come forwarded with this application for bail. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the intervener would object the grant of anticipatory bail. 5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the investigation is in initial stage and hence seeks for dismissal of the anticipatory bail petition. 6. In view of the facts and circumstances of this case and arguments advanced by the learned counsel on either side, this Court is of the considered opinion that the alleged occurrence has taken place in the month of December 2007 and hence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Andipatti, and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. 8. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 04/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ANDIPATTI 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI DISTRICT 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, (LAND GRABBING SPECIAL WING), THENI, THENI DISTRICT. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. VEERA KATHIRAVAN Advocate SR.No.34748 GH : 07.10.2011 : 2P/6C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12398 of 2011 Date :04/10/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/