IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 7295 of 2011 Decided on: 31st August, 2011. Veena Devi. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Ms. Ambika Kotwal, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner has dispute with regard to the income Certificate issued to the 4th respondent. The Certificate is issued by the Tehsildar. That Certificate has been taken note of by the Deputy Commissioner as well as by the Divisional Commissioner and on that basis the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed. According to the petitioner, the Certificate is not proper and that the income of the 4th respondent has not been properly assessed. If that be so, that grievance, the petitioner has to pursue before the Sub Divisional Magistrate. So long as the Income Certificate 2 issued to the petitioner is not disturbed, the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner or the Divisional Commissioner cannot be held to be illegal. Therefore, without prejudice to the liberty to the petitioner to pursue her grievance against the Income Certificate issued to the 4th respondent in appropriate proceedings in appropriate forum, the writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 31st August, 2011. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (tr) Judge. 3