IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26338 of 2009 PAPPU CHAUDHARY @ ANIL KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 23.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant. There is case and counter case in between the parties for having their right of agja. Petitioner is specifically alleged for firing for which it is said that no grievous injury is found, as opinion reserved that is irrelevant. In the case, firing is not aimed on the relevant part of body but aimed could be proved fatal and in no way minimizes the liability when injuries are found on upper part of the body. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioner is rejected. shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)