IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P. No. 787 of 1995 Date of Decision: July 13, 2011 Sukhjinder Singh and another ….Petitioners Versus Harbans Singh and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: None. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) I have gone through the record. The brief facts of the present case are that respondent No.1 filed a suit, for declaration to the effect that he is owner in possession, against the present petitioners which was dismissed on 04.05.1995. Allegations of the petitioners are that in the influence of respondents, police detained the petitioners on 04.06.1995 under Section107/51 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Petitioners further alleged in the petition that on COCP No.787 of 1995 28.05.1995 respondent No.1 forcibly took the possession of 4 kanals of land. No reply has been filed on behalf of the respondents. In the opinion of this Court, the matter can be decided on the basis of evidence of the parties regarding the fact as to whether possession has been taken or not. Moreover, the petitioners have the liberty to approach the Civil Court, where the matter is subjudice. In view of the above, present petition is dismissed. July 13, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2