IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SUNDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 1971 of 2007 Between: S.S.Chalam S/o.Late Laxmaiah, C/o.T.Ananthalwar, H.No.44- 24-21/A/3, Kanna Rao Street Railway New colony, Visakhapatnam. .... PETITIONER AND 1. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, rep.by its Managing Director, Mushirabad,Hyderabad 2. Regional Manager, APSRTC., Visakhapatnam Region Visakhapatnam. 3. Depot Manager, APSRTC, Simhachalam Depot, Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order direction or writ one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondent-corporation in not implementing the orders of this Hon`ble court in WP.No.16373 of 2001 dated 20.9.2001 which was granted in the light of the Judgment of Division Bench in WA.No.1350/1999 as wholly illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to the provisions of section 47 of the persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act,1995 and consequently direct the respondents herein to provide alternative employment to the petitioner by creating supernumerary post. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.VISWANATHAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.K.MADHAVA REDDY(SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following order: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P.No.1971 of 2007 ORDER: This writ petition has been instituted seeking directions to the respondent – A.P.S.R.T.C., to implement the judgment rendered by this Court in W.P.No.16373 of 2001, dated 29-09-2001. It is now represented by the counsel appearing on both sides that the aforementioned judgment has been implemented and the appointment on compassionate grounds has already been made, therefore, the cause in this writ petition does not survive for further scrutiny. Recording the submission made by both the counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. -------------------------------- Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J mrk 9th June 2009 ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRK}