IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 16TH MARCH 2009 / 25TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 8192 of 2009(T) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- NITISH K.RADHAN, S/O.SRI.K.G.RADHAN, KOODAKKARA HOUSE, OLLUKKARA, MANNUTHY, TRICHUR- 680 651. BY ADV. MR.K.K.JAYASOORIAN MR.A.A.ZIYAD RAHMAN MR.LAL K.JOSEPH MR.SHEENA SAMUEL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., PIN- 673535, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY PO, PIN-673 635. MR. P.C. SASIDHARAN - SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No. 8192 OF 2009 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of March, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner appeared for the 5th Semester Examination of his B.Tech Degree Course. He failed in the theory examination of ‘PROGRAMMING PARADIGMS'. Dissatisfied with the results, the petitioner submitted Ext.P3 application dated, 20.2.2009 for revaluation of the answer paper. The petitioner seeks expeditious revaluation of the same. 2. I have heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents also. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that they would require at least two more months’ time to complete the revaluation process. After hearing both sides, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to complete the revaluation process for which the petitioner has applied for and declare the results thereof as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a W.P.(c)No.8192/09 2 period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, provided the application submitted by the petitioner is in order in all respects. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd