IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5596 of 2010 1. MUKESH KUMAR SINGH @ MUKESH SINGH 2. Deepak Singh Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 11.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there was reason of remaining the huge quantity of country- made wine because of the reason that petitioner’s brother, Manoj Singh was licensee and he was continuing with residuary expecting renewal of license in his favour. If it may not be believed then also it was in possession of Manoj Singh. Now, Manoj Singh has been allowed regular bail by the Court below under observation and direction of the High Court. In those circumstances, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Excise Case No. 101(GC) of 2009, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Barh subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)