IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1867 of 2009 YOGENDRA YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 2.4.2010 Heard. This petition appears frivously filed and the reliance placed on the judgment appears completely in ignorance of the notification which is mentioned in the copy of the judgment itself which has been annexed as Annexure-3 to the present petition. Notification No. 227A issued by this Court is in respect of vesting powers to try a case summarily. This is explicitly clear from that, that the notification which is copied in the judgment Annexure-3 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 39995 of 2008 mentions Section 260(i) © of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Section 260(i) © relates to the trial by summary proceedings. It never relates to power of the Magistrate to take cognizance which is under Section 190 of the Cr. P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner in spite of being reminded not to make submission as that will tantamount to wastage of Court’s time, went on making submissions. The petition is dismissed as being frivously filed with cost of Rs. 1,000/- which shall be paid to the State to be realized from the petitioner as fine. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)