In The High Court Of Judicature For Rajasthan Bench At Jaipur. SB Civil Second Appeal No.23/09 Nathhi v. Rameshwar Date of order March 27, 2009 Hon'ble Justice JR Goyal Mr. SK Gupta, for appellant This second appeal under S.100 CPC has been preferred by the appellant- plaintiff against the judgment and decree dated 9.5.08 passed by Additional District Judge (Fast Track) No.1, Dholpur in Regular Appeal No.270/07, whereby the appeal has been dismissed and the judgment and decree dated 30.3.07 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bari (Dholpur) in Civil Suit No.7/02, has been maintained. Brief facts of the case are that plaintiff-appellant filed a suit for specific performance of contract of the disputed land with the averments that defendant- respondent entered into an agreement on 2.2.99 with the plaintiff for sale of his one-third share of the disputed land to the plaintiff, but he did not execute any sale-deed. Defendant denied such agreement, issues were framed. Plaintiff did not adduce any evidence, however, the defendant produced his two witnesses. After hearing the parties, trial court dismissed plaintiff's suit. Appeal of the plaintiff was also dismissed by the First Appellate Court. Hence this appeal. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. It is not disputed that on the side of appellant-plaintiff, no evidence was adduced. There are concurrent findings of fact of both the courts below arrived at on the basis of material available on record. There appears no substantial question of law involved in this matter. Keeping in view the entire facts and circumstances, I do not find any good reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and decree. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed in limine. (JR Goyal) J.