IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1691 of 2003 SUSHILA ARYA Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 34. 29/07/2009 When this case was taken up on 22.4.2009, learned counsel for the petitioner had submitted that he had communicated the petitioner about the order passed by this Court on 24.11.2008 but he had not received any response from the petitioner. Therefore, he prayed for adjournment. Matter was accordingly ordered to be listed after summer vacation. Today, no one appears for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the opposite party is present and he informs this Court that till now petitioner has not filed any application in terms of the order dated 24.11.2008 before the authorities for their assistance for erecting boundary wall around the land. It appears that petitioner is no more interested in the matter as her counsel also is absent from the Court. In the circumstances, this contempt application is dismissed for want of prosecution. Pradeep/ (J. N. Singh, J.)