IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 26TH MARCH 2009 / 5TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 3235 of 2009(I) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. CHINNAMANY, W/O. LATE MARIMUTHU KOUNDER, SANTHALINGA NAGAR, KUPPANDA KOUNDANOOR, OZHALAPATHY VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. BHAGAVATHY S/O. LATE MARIMUTHU KOUNDER, SANTHALINGA NAGAR, KUPPANDA KOUNDANOOR, OZHALAPATHY VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 3. KANAKARAJ, S/O. LATE MARIMUTHU KOUNDER, SANTHALINGA NAGAR, KUPPANDA KOUNDANOOR, OZHALAPATHY VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 4. RANGANAYAKI, D/O. LATE MARIMUTHU KOUNDER, SANTHALINGA NAGAR, KUPPANDA KOUNDANOOR, OZHALAPATHY VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.H.BADARUDDIN SMT.AYSHA RAHMAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD. 2. CHAIRMAN, TALUK LAND BOARD, CHITTUR. 3. BODI BOYAN, S/O. KUKOLA BOYNA, KUPPANDA KOUNDANOOR, OZHAPATHY VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD. 4. SELVAKUMAR, S/O. LATE SUBBAYYA KOUNDER, KUPPANDA KOUNDANOOR, OZHALAPATHY VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD. /2/ 5. PARAMASIVAN, S/O. PAZHANI SWAMY, OZHALAPATHY, PALAKKAD. 6. NADAYAN, S/O. CHINNAPPAN, ANAMPATHI, OZHALAPATHY, PALAKKAD. 7. ARMUGHAN, S/O. KARUPPAN, CHINNAKOUNDANOOR, OZHALAPATHY, PALAKKAD. 8. INDUMBAN, S/O. PAZHANI, CHINNAKOUNDANOOR, OZHALAPATHY, PALAKKAD. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- W.P.(C).No.3235 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 26th day of March, 2009. JUDGMENT The case of the petitioner is that in Ceiling Case No.1946/74 before the Taluk Land Board, Chittur he has filed Ext.P2 application under Section 7E of the Land Reforms Act, claiming right over 3.71 acres of land which the Petitioner claims to have purchased. It is stated that the application has not been considered and that in the meanwhile he is threatened to be dispossessed from the land. Taking note of this submission this court by order dated 4.2.2009 directed that status quo be maintained and that possession continues even as on date. Now that the petitioner's case is regarding the pendency of Ext.P2, where he has raised a claim under Section 7E of the Act, it is directed that Ext.P2 shall be considered and dealt with by the Taluk Land Board as WP(c).No.3235/09 /2/ expeditiously as possible. In the meanwhile I direct that status quo as on date, in so far as the possession and enjoyment of the property referred to above shall be maintained . Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the Taluk Land Bard for compliance. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WP(c).No.3235/09 /2/