IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9186 of 2010 1. PREM SHANKAR, S/O SRI RAM CHANDRA SHARMA, R/O VILLAGE PIPRA, P.O. AND P.S. DARAUNDA, DISTRICT -SIWAN. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYATI RAJ, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYATI RAJ, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SIWAN. 5. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT RAJ OFFICER, SIWAN. 6. THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MAHARAJGANJ, SIWAN. 7. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, DARAUNDA, SIWAN. 8. THE SARPANCH GRAM KATCHAHARI, SIRSAWN, DARAUNDA, SIWAN. 9. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, SIRSAWN, DARAUNDA, SIWAN. 10. SRI NIWAS, S/O LATE SAGAR YADAV, R/O VILLAGE PIPRA, P.O. AND P.S. DARAUNDA, DISTRICT-SIWAN. 11. YOGENDRA YADAV, S/O SRI SUKHATH YADAV, R/O VILLAGE PIPRA, P.O. AND P.S. DARAUNDA, DISTRICT-SIWAN. ----------- 2 31.03.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inspite of the orders passed by the S.D.O. in terms of Rule 12 of Bihar Gram Kutchhery Secretary (Employment Service Conditions and Duty) Rules, 2007 which is entirely in favour of the petitioner the same is not being implemented and the petitioner is not being paid consequential salary of the duties which he is performing till now. The order of the S.D.O. is quasi judicial order as it has been passed under 2 Rule 12 of the Rules. The S.D.O. should feel himself empowered enough to get his order implemented himself. Petitioner should point out to the S.D.O. that inspite of his orders his subordinate authorities are not implementing the same so that the S.D.O. may take appropriate steps for an early implementation of his order. The writ application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)