IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.6 of 2010 Liyakat Ali, son of Late Abdul Kadir, resident of village Barka Takiya, P.O. Khudaibagh, P.S. Khaira, District Saran at Chapra .... Defendant 1st party-Petitioner-Petitioner. Versus 1.Md. Mustafa Kamal, son of Abdul Hamid, resident of Mohalla Karimchak, P.O. and P.S. Chapra Town, District Saran at Chapra .…Plaintiff-Opposite party 1st set-Opposite party 1st set. 2. Bibi Mahmuda Khatoon wife of Sarur Mohammad, 3. Sarur Mohammad, son of Late Noor Mohammad, both are resident of Mohalla Karim Chak, P.O. and P.S. Chapra Town, District Saran at Chapra. ……Defendants 1st party-Opposite party 2nd set-Opposite party 2nd set. 4. Hidayal Ali Ansari, son of Safi Ansari resident of village Bedwalia, P.O. Garkha, P.S. Bheldi, District Saran. …..Defendant 3rd party-Opposite party 3rd set-Opposite party 3rd set. For the petitioner :Ms. Rajani Kumari, Advocate. For the opposite parties :None ----------- 04/ 02.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This petition has been filed by the petitioner for review of order dated 14.12.2009 by which this court dismissed C.R. No.254 of 2008. The aforesaid civil revision was filed by the defendant-petitioner challenging order dated 15.11.2007 by which learned Subordinate Judge-VI, Chapra rejected his application under Order XIV Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure for striking out Issue Nos.(vii), (viii) and (ix) of Title Suit No.184 of 1997 when pleadings were complete, issues were framed and 2 evidence of both the parties were closed much earlier. It further transpires that issues were re-casted on 15.03.2007 on the submissions of the defendants themselves. In the said circumstances, this appears to be an absolutely frivolous petition. From the facts and circumstances of this case, this court does not find any error apparent on the face of the record nor does it find any fresh material to take a different view. Accordingly, this civil review petition is dismissed. harish/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )