1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.__________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 22 OF 2008 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar/s orders | and Registrar’s orders | CORAM : P. R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 28 th JUNE, 2010. 1 None present for the applicant. AGP Shri Wagh appears for respondent no. 1. Adv. Miss P.P. Kale holding for Adv. Mrs. Asha Rasal appears for the petitioner in contempt petition. Adv. Shri Darakh appears for respondent no. 3. Adv. Shri A.D. Kasliwal appears for respondent no. 6. 2 It is noted by the office that the review petition is beyond 140 days of the limitation. The applicant has not filed delay condonation application nor removed other office objections. It is also stated that the tile is incorrect and list of documents is not filed. Since the review petition is suffering from several defects which are not 2 cured from 2008 till this date, this application is dismissed for non-prosecution. 3 Contempt petition to proceed further. ( P. R. BORKAR, J.) dyb / office /ra22.08.odt 3 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.__________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 23 OF 2008 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar/s orders | and Registrar’s orders | CORAM : P. R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 28 th JUNE, 2010. . Adv. Mrs. Asha Rasal is present for the applicant. She assures to remove the office objections within a period of five weeks from today. In case such steps are not taken, this review application shall stand dismissed for not prosecution. ( P. R. BORKAR, J.) dyb / office /ra22.08.odt