^ o'rVLI IN THE HIGH COURT OP JUDlCATURE AT BZLASPUR (C»0.) W.P.NO. ^f^i'5 OP 2003 BSTNBBN Dev Prasad choubey S/o Shri ©nkari)rasa<3 Choubey^ aged about 45 years^ wor^lng as gLock oo-ordinator^ Bloclc Saktl^ Distrlct Janjgir Oiampa (CG). I^TTTIONEK 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. A N D Th^ State of GhhattJls^arh, ^hrough the s©cretaryDeparwtm©ntof @chool Education^ Mantrelay^ D»K»S»Bailding^ Raipur (CG). The Director^ Public Instructions, Raipur (03) ,-^A J^:; FIihe_Director, __ ~ " _ "; ' _• .^\^^@? RajivGanahi Shiksha Mission^ Raipur (CG).'^N^C\<?7^ f£h©Gollector^ Janjgir Champa (C33)» Th©©istrictEdlucation Officer » Janjgir Champa • The District Baucatlon Officer^ Bilsspur (CG). O)4'f^ /^/'^ 7J<^ .//. /<T ^ <^.. .<t-'z/ «•<<:* t» Shri B.]R< Dewangan^ U^pezr Division Teacher^ Govt* Hr^ Secondary Sdhool Sakti^District Janjgir Charopa (03). / RESPONDENTS WRIT FETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OP THE CONSTlTUTION O? INDIA ¥ HIGH COURT OP JUDICATURB CaiHATHtBGARH: BILA8PUR Sin^e Bench: Hoa'Me Slu-l Sattsh K. Agittiliotri, J. W. P. No. 4143 OF 2003 Petitioner : Dev Prasad Choubey Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and ofhers Shri Rajneesh Kumar Shrivas, counsel for fhe petitioner. Shri Paiikaj Shrivastava, Panel lawyer for the rcspondente No. 1 to 6/State. None for fhe respondent No. 7, ORALORDBR (27**> Pebruary, 2006) Learaed counsel for the petitioner submits on iastruction fhat wifh the passage of time, fhe xaatter has become iafructuous, to which learaed counsel for the respondents No, 1 to 6 has no objection. The writ petition is disinissed as haviog becoine mfi-uctuous. No oxder as to costs. Sadsh K. Agnihotri Judge Bablu