IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4812/08 [ Meenakshi Patle ..vs.. Sanjay Patle] ===================================== CORAM: S.R. DONGAONKAR, J. DATE:20,1.2009 . Heard Miss. Mehta, holding for Shri Bhandarkar, Advocate for the petitioner. None present for the petitioner, though served. It appears that the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Gondia; on the application of the petitioner granted interim maintenance of Rs.1000/- per month to the petitioner / wife and Rs.1000/-per month for the daughter. This order of interim maintenance is challenged in this petition. It is seen that the petition is for divorce. It is also seen that the documents on record suggest that the income of the respondent per month was around Rs.8717/-. Further it appears that there are no specific reasons showing justification for grant of interim maintenance as claimed by the petitioner. The requirements of petitioner are not brought on record specifically In these circumstances, it is difficult to say that the interim maintenance of Rs.2000/- is any way less to meet the requirements of the petitioner. This being the interim order of maintenance, the petitioner is always entitled to move for enhancement of such maintenance, if so required even before the trial court. In these circumstances, no case is made out for interference in this petition. Petition dismissed. JUDGE smp