THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.11212 of 2011 BETWEEN: Thatikonda brahma Linga Swamy. PETITIONER And 1. The Commissioner of Endowments, Tilak Road, Hyderabad, and others. RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioner: Sri K. Govind Counsel for the respondent Nos.1 & 2: G.P. for Endowments Counsel for the respondent No.3: Sri V.T.M. Prasad The Court made the following: ORDER: In view of the short grievance presented by the learned counsel for the petitioner, which is acceded to by the learned Standing Counsel Sri V.T.M. Prasad, during the course of hearing, the matter need not be gone into in detail. The petitioner is a member of the founder’s family of Sri Venkateswara Swamy Temple at Narsipatnam. The Deputy Commissioner of Endowments by orders in D.Dis.No.A1/2069/2004, dated 13.06.2004 based on the report of the founder trustee, directed that the Executive Officer of the institution should obtain approval of the founder trustee on every withdrawal, before seeking permission for withdrawal of amount from the accounts of the institution. The said order, however, has been cancelled by means of the impugned order passed in Rc.No.A1/625/2011 Admn., dated 19.03.2011. A perusal of the order shows that no notice has been given to the petitioner before passing the said order. In the circumstances, both the learned counsel submit that the impugned order be set aside with liberty to the 2nd respondent-Deputy Commissioner to pass fresh orders only after due notice to the petitioner. In view of the said submission, the impugned order Rc.No.A1/625/2011 Admn, dated 19.03.2011 is set aside. The 2nd respondent is at liberty to pass fresh orders after due notice to the petitioner. The writ petition is accordingly allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ NOUSHAD ALI, J. 20th April, 2011 Js.