@ IVS" \W/L/ WSV WRIT PETITION NO. 2004. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2261227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITISI l ORDERISI I DIRECTIONISI, ETC. ' ve‘wm——E xRx—‘RM xxx— IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE. CHHATISGARH AT BILASUR. I «w I EA V, I: PETITTIONER MAHENDRA KUMAR KAUSHIK, S/o. SHRI B.L.KAUSHIK, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, MATA CHOWARAHA, KUDUND, BILASPUR, DIST. (c.G.) VERsus RESPONDENTS ' 1. STATE OF CHHATISGARH THROUGH SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, E GOVERNMENT OF CHHATISGARH, RAIPUR. jg"; ‘yx% %\0i.n" w<$NW II "A“:MT q?” 2. DISRIOT COLLECTOR, BILASPUR, (CG) t . $m‘i4 l 3. DIST. EDUCATION OFFICER, XI—HC-ZZ 03/09/2004: — Shri KR Nair, counsel forthe petirioner‘ Shri V.V‘S‘ Murthy, Dy. Advocate General, with Shri U.N‘S. Deo,’G.A., Shri Yashwant Thakur, G.A., Shri Satish Guata, Dy.G‘A.} Shri Akhil Agrawa! and Shri Sandeep Dubey, Panel Lawyers, for the State/respondents. Application for urgent hearing is al owed. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter relates to transfer of the petitioner. He further submits that for the present the petitioner may be given an opportunity of filing the detaiied representation before the Competent Authority of the respondents, which shalt be considered on its own merits in accordance with law. ;Having heard and considered the: rival contentions; without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, in the ooinion of this Court ends ofjustice would be served if a direction is given to the petitior er to make a detailed representation raising his grievance before the State/Compete Authority of the respondents along with a copy. of the petition and this order, within en days, and on such representation being made, the competent authority of the r spondents shall consider and decide the same on its own merits in accordance wi h law as early as possible, preferably within six weeks from the date of receipt of the r presentation. If any contravention of policy or guidelines is brought to the notice, the same be considered on its own merits. Learned counsel for the petitio er prays that after the decision of the representation, if any grievance of the p itioner remains he may be allowed to avail the remedy available under the law. lt is open to the petitioner to avail the remedy available underthe law. With the aforesaid observations, t is petition stands‘disposed of. Consequently, M.W.P., if any, sta ds disposed of. Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge ll Certified copy as per rules. Copy to State counsel for complia ce. l