IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14577 of 2010 7 6.12.2010 1. SHYAM DEO PRASAD YADAV S/O LATE DWARIKA PRASAD YADAV R/O VILL.- SHAHPUR PANDAOR, P.S.- PARAS BIGHA, DISTT.- JEHANABAD ….. PETITIONER Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI 2. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE COMMISSIONER, MAGADH DIVISION, GAYA 5. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, JEHANABAD 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R.E.O., JEHANABAD 7. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, R.E.O., JEHANABAD 8. THE JUNIOR ENGINEERS, R.E.O. POSTED IN JEHANABAD BLOCK, JEHANABAD 9. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, JEHANABAD, DISTT.- JEHANABAD 10. SMT. KARUNA DEVI MUKHIYA OF GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ PANDOOI, R/O VILL.- SIKARIA, P.S.- PARAS BIGAHA, DISTT.- JEHANABAD …. RESPONDENTS ------- For the Petitioner : Mr Santosh Kr. Sinha -2 For the Union of India : Mr Md. Abu Haider, CGC For the State : Mr P.K.Singh, SC 21 ------- Heard the parties. This public interest litigation has been filed to - 2 - seek action against persons responsible for alleged impropriety or misappropriation in execution of work under NAREGA. From the submissions and materials on record it appears that after preliminary enquiry an FIR has been lodged by the authorities against certain persons. Now, learned counsel for the petitioner is satisfied that law has been set in motion but he wants an observation from this Court that the supervising police officer should be careful in supervising the case. Considering all the facts and circumstances, this public interest litigation is now disposed of. It goes without saying that the police is expected to conclude the investigation fairly and in accordance with law. sk (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)