IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 8344 of 2006 Between: 1.G.Ramavatharam, S/o.Late G.Banaiah, A-628, HAL Colony, Balanagar, Hyderabad-42. 2.A R K Chowdary, S/o.Late A Rama Mohana Rao, A-652 HAL Colony, Balanagar, Hyderabad-42. 3.G Annaji Rao, S/o.G.Suryanarayana, A-652 HAL Colony, Balanagar, Hyderabad-42. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1.Joint Registrar / District Cooperative Officer, Ranga Reddy District, Samrat Complex, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2.Divisional Cooperative Officer, Hyderabad (West)Division, Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad. 3.Hindustan Aeronautic Employees Cooperative Credit- Scoiety Ltd., TBC 187, HAL Complex, Balanagar, Hyderabad 500 042, Rep by its President. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the failure on the part of the 1st respondent i.e The Joint Registrar / District Cooperative Officer, Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad in not instituting an enquiry u/s. 51 of the A.P.Cooperative Societies Act 7 of 1964 in to the Constitution, Working and Financial Condition of the Hindustan Aeronautics Employees Cooperative Credit Society Ltd., TAB 187 Hyderabad despite the application dt.28-12-2005 signed by 341 members of the society, as patently arbitrary, high handed besides contrary to the very Section 51 of the Act and consequently direct the 1st respondent to order the said enquiry. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.D.V.BHADRAM Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: GP FOR COOPERATION Counsel for the Respondent No.3: -- The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON’BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI Writ Petition No.8344 of 2006 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the in action on the part of the first respondent in causing an enquiry under Section 51 of the A.P.Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 (for short ‘the Act’) into the constitution and working of the third respondent-Society, despite the application made by 341 members of the Society, is arbitrary and illegal. When the matter is taken up for consideration, it is brought to my notice by the learned Government Pleader for Cooperation that during the pendency of this writ petition, the first respondent passed an order, dated 08.06.2006, directing an enquiry under Section 51 of the Act into the constitution, working and financial position of the third respondent-Society. A copy of the said proceedings, dated 08.06.2006, has also been placed before this Court. In the circumstances, no further enquiry is necessary and accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _______________ 11.06.2008 VGB