IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI FRIDAY, THE 13TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 22ND KARTHIKA 1931 Mat.Appeal.No. 276 of 2009(G) ---------------------------- OP.1010/2006 of FAMILY COURT, PALAKKAD .................... APPELLANT/RESPONDENT ----------------------------------- INDU, D/O.RAMACHANDRAN, PATTATHODI, MANISSERY DESOM, THRIKKANGODE AMSOM, OTTAPPALAM TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.K.B.ARUNKUMAR RESPONDENT: PETITIONER ------------------------- NITHYA PRAKASH, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O.SANKARAN, KUZHIKKARA, KOTHAKURUSSI AMSOM DESOM, OTTAPPALAM TALUK. ADV. SRI.SANTHEEP ANKARATH FOR R1 SMT.N.N.PRASEEDA FOR R1 THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ------------------------------------ Mat.Appeal No.276 of 2009 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of November, 2009 JUDGMENT BASANT, J. This appeal is directed against a decree granting divorce. The appellant is the wife. During the pendency of the appeal, the parties have settled their disputes, it is submitted. The learned counsel for the appellant submits, and a statement to that effect duly signed by the appellant and countersigned by her counsel is filed, that the parties having settled their disputes the appellant does not want to prosecute this appeal. Request of the counsel for the appellant is accepted. 2. This appeal is, in these circumstances, dismissed as not pressed. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE) rtr/-