IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWETIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 1472 of 2002, 1281 and 1282 of 2003 WRIT APPEAL NO : 1472 of 2002 Between: N.Sadashiv ..... APPELLANT(S) AND B.Rajaram and two others. ………..Respondents WRIT APPEAL NO : 1281 of 2003 Between: Kuchhulapati Ramakrishnam Raju ..... APPELLANT(S) AND The Commissioner & Prohibition of Excise, Government of A.P., Hyderabad and two others. ………..Respondents WRIT APPEAL NO : 1282 of 2003 Between: Jakkampudi Krishna ..... APPELLANT(S) AND The Commissioner & Prohibition of Excise, Government of A.P., Hyderabad and two others .………..Respondents THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 1472 of 2002, 1281 and 1282 of 2003 COMMON JUDGMENT (Per BPR,J): The learned counsel, appearing for the appellants in all the writ appeals, represents that the subject matter in the writ appeals has become infructuous. Accordingly, all the writ appeals are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _______________________ JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO Date: 20th August 2009 _______________________ JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR KVR