1 appa1444.10 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1444 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1350 OF 2008 Sanjay Sakharam Devrukhkar. ....Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ....Respondent. Mr. Khan Abdul Wahab, advocate for applicant. Ms. S.V.Gajare, APP for the State. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED:- DECEMBER 21, 2010. P.C. 1. This is second bail application on merits by the present applicant. First bail application was rejected by the Division Bench consisting of Justice Bilal Nazki and Justice F.M.Reis on 30th March, 2009 being Criminal Application No.1448 of 2008 by a speaking order. The only argument canvassed before us is that the trial Court has committed manifest error in permitting the evidence of approver to be let in. This argument cannot be entertained in the second bail application on merits, not being a changed circumstance. Since no other argument is canvassed, the application should fail. The same is rejected. 2 appa1444.10 2. Counsel for the applicant submits that in that case, atleast hearing of the Appeal be expedited. Insofar as criminal appeal No.1350 of 2008 is concerned, the same shall proceed as per its turn under caption ‘convicts in jail’, which category by itself is expedited hearing cases as per the present assignment. The applicant will be free to file private paper book so as to facilitate expeditious hearing of the said appeal as per its turn under the said category. As soon as the appeal becomes ready, the same be placed for hearing under caption “convicts in jail” as per its turn. (A.P.BHANGALE, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)