FAO No.2511 of 2007 -1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.2511 of 2007 Date of Decision: 15.5.2009 M/s Ferozeshah Agro Pvt.Ltd. ...Appellant. Vs. The Punjab state Co-operative supply and Marketing Federation Limited and others. ...Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.O.P.Hoshiarpuri, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.Rajiv Malhotra, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. Ms.Neena Madan, Advocate for Mr.Raghujit Singh Madan, Advocate for respondent No.4. RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. This appeal is directed against the order dated 10.3.2007 passed by District Judge, Ferozepur whereby Objections filed by the appellants under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short `the Act') against the arbitral award has been dismissed. Shorn of unnecessary details, the only argument raised by counsel for the appellant is that the arbitral award is not definite. In reply, learned counsel for the respondent has argued that the same contention was raised by the learned counsel for the appellant before the Court below in which the following observations have been made. “I also find no force in the contention of the learned FAO No.2511 of 2007 -2 - counsel for the petitioner firm that the award given by the arbitrator is not definite and clear as in the concluding lines of the award the arbitrator has stated that any rice delivered after 22.2.2002 in the account of the Markfed is ordered to be adjusted. This finding of the arbitrator does not make the award illegal and null and void because the arbitrator has given this finding in favour of the petitioner and otherwise also, the petitioners were supplying the rice and they had been seeking time for the supply of the rice even before the arbitrator. Even if the arbitrator has given the specific date as 22.2.2002 that after that date if any rice is delivered by the petitioner in the account of the Markfed, the same will be adjusted alongwith the interest, on that account the finding in favour of the petitioner will not negate the award.” After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I do not find any error in the findings recorded by the Court below in para 19 of its order in respect of the arbitral award. No other point has been raised before this Court. In view of the above, I do not find any merit in the order of the learned Court below and as such, the present appeal is dismissed. No costs. (Rakesh Kumar Jain) 15.5.2009 Judge Meenu