^ ^ ^s!s'!!Va:s:h. /'^as&h ffc-:^. 1 % "" '- 3 i3 JSL. niwi3A'tK^^^fffS^S'Sf^^'^^St^^_ "7^ 311^1 qil fiFIW WII 3II^!I shli* '3%r"4l4lt*1^»fllwi<s,fa<!1l'My,< WR'II fl»*<l<t» •WI.200 sn^r 'q^s' ('^pi^^) TOIIW ^itei sii^i (Sinate Bench: Hon'ble Mi^jystjce Dhjrendra Mishra) WdtPrtition s1 N0.6458/2007 (Petition under Art.22 PETITIONER Dr. R.L| about 51 Officer, Raipur ( Versus RESPONDENIS 1. 2. isttation State of | Administtatio BhawanJ The Urider ;hhattisgarh, Through: ttie Secretary, Ufban & Development Department, D.K.S. IRaipur (CG). : Secretary, Urban Administration & Developrjient Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 3. Shri R.K; Industriall Bag, Rai< 29.01.2009 | Miss Farha Minhaz, Advocs Mr. Arun Sao, Govt. Advocsft Heard. This petiljon is directed 15.10.2007 (Annexure P-1) wher^t Chief Municipal OfRcer and postec) District Raipur.has been transfe< Office, Urban Administration & De\ Learned counsel for the p^ status quo order dated 12.11.200^ is still working as Chief Municipal Bazar <<ill(i'l4-l 'Vf^l 4ftlzt <Pn«t]t ^affinai^i of Constitution of Indla) Pandey, S/o Late ShriS.D. Pandey, Aged years, Presentty Working as Chief Municipal Municipai Councii Baioda Bazar, District ;.G^ Donger, Depot Manager, Chhattisgath Devetopment Corperation, Opposite Moti fW(C.G) feforthepetitioner. te for the State. [against the transfer order dated ^by the petitioner,Who is working as at Municipal Council, toloda Bazar, i|red as Assistant Director, Regtonal <|elopment Department, Raipur. Wtioher submite that on account of passed by this Court, the petitioner Officer. Municipal Council. Baloda WU'£\0iiJlil ys;"ll<!>1 IW-li'CIM—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000. """"^sr •<ij(*ii<yfii,'; »Tit+<'i<o; fsiciwy t<n<ni fl)*ii«i> 3II^I^l!<-ti«b wn ofi^i is>*iitti w (^- ^ •V1200 am^T'q^i' (yilai'i'i) wnw^fci 3ii^i 2-4 nbt Mr. Sao, leamed Govt. Ad^ by virtue of statas quo order impugned transfer order of Anne)<i relates to the petitioner, could these circumstances, the transfe| meaningtess & redundant with th^ he has no objection if the petiti( order of Annexure P-1 is set ai appropriate orders in the mat admjnistrative exigency. In view of above submissioti instant petition is allowed and the| P-1 dated 15.10.2007, so far as| hereby set aside. However, th< appropriate orders with regard of administrative exigency. Consequently, I.A. No.1, alsostandsdisposed of. Certifiedcopyas perrules. '*wi<'l<fl'f *ll'(df'ff fs%t<l»i«<;i< ^sifwisn^r ^ocate for the State also submits that llated 12.11.2007 of this Court. the <ure P-1 dated 15.10.2007, so far as it be given effect to titl date. and in order of Annexure P-1 has become lapse of time. He further submits that ^n is allbwed and impygned transfer pde with liberty to the State to pass (er of transfer of petitioner under of learned counsel tor the State, the limpugned transfer orderof Annexure |it relates to the petitioner herein, is State shall be at liberiy to pass to |transfer of the petitioner in the event ^pplication for grant of interim retief Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge iiiitiflii <!^!<i ^"iicifl iw^i^iira— FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000.