Crl.Misc. No.M-37226 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc. No.M-37226 of 2010 Date of Decision: 8.03.2011 Thana Ram ...Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana ...Respondent BEFORE: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: Mr.Yogesh Goel Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Preeti Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana. --- 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest. --- Alok Singh, J. (Oral) This is an application seeking regular bail in FIR No.120 dated 29.05.2010 under sections 406, 420 and 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Kherki Daula District Gurgaon. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has sold the land to the complainant. However, due to oversight mistake description was wrongly given in the sale deed and petitioner is ready to rectify the mistake if the complainant wishes to do so. Learned counsel for Crl.Misc. No.M-37226 of 2010 2 the petitioner states that the petitioner is in judicial custody w.e.f. 14.10.2010. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions of Viney Kumar ASI states that in the present matter challan has already been submitted before the court. Question 'as to whether wrong description of the property was mentioned in the sale deed by oversight mistake or with the mens rea to cheat the complainant' can only be decided after evidence is produced before the court. In view of this, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Let the petitioner be released on bail to the satisfaction of trial court. (Alok Singh) 8.03.2011 Judge rp