IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SLA No.65 of 2008 MANOJ KUMAR PANDIT Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. NARAYAN PANDIT 3. DIWAKAR PANDIT 4. PRABHAKAR PANDIT 5. BIBHAKAR PANDIT 6. BINDESHWARI PANDIT 7. GARIB PANDIT 8. SUDHAKAR PANDIT For the petitioner :Mr.Vivekanand Singh For the State :Mr.Indu Bala Pandey, APP ----------- 2. 12.01.2009 Heard Mr. Vivekanand Singh in support of the application. The challenge is thrown to the order of acquittal recorded by the trial court. The opposite parties herein were tried under sections 341,323 and 384/34 IPC. They have been acquitted of the charges. This Court perused the judgment. The learned trial court on the basis of the oral as well as the documentary evidence brought on record by the parties, has come to the conclusion that the complainant has not come up with clean hands inasmuch as there is convincing document/evidence on record to show that the complainant was not coming from the market but was coming from a different place which is the government office where he had gone to receive certain documents. The court in paragraphs 9,10 and 12 has - 2 - considered the materials in right perspective. In the opinion of this Court, interference with the order impugned shall not subserve the cause of justice. The application stands dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )