IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5319 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5319 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5319 OF 2005 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL NO.2624 OF 200 FIRST APPEAL NO.2624 OF 200 FIRST APPEAL NO.2624 OF 2005 Ichalkaranji Municipal Council .. Applicant V/s Shri.Tejpal C.Shah & Ors. .. Respondents Ms.Archana Kolge for the Applicant. Mr.Arjunwadkar for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & R.S.MOHITE, JJ. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATE : 17.01.2006. DATE : 17.01.2006. DATE : 17.01.2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Perused the order dated 12.12.2005. In Paragraph No.3 of the said order it is wrongly recorded as "subject to the "subject to the "subject to the condition that Respondent to pay the entire decretal condition that Respondent to pay the entire decretal condition that Respondent to pay the entire decretal amount" amount" amount". Instead of the aforesaid wording it should be "subject to the condition that the Appellant to deposit "subject to the condition that the Appellant to deposit "subject to the condition that the Appellant to deposit the entire decretal amount". the entire decretal amount". the entire decretal amount". The order dated 12.12.2005 stands corrected accordingly. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.)