IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 13TH APRIL 2007 / 23RD CHAITHRA 1929 WP(C).No. 13067 of 2007(E) ------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- NIDHIN.V.ANIL, 4TH SEMESTER STUDENT, B.A.MULTIMEDIA, ST.JOSEPH COLLEGE OF COMMUNICATION, KURISUMMOODU.P.O., CHANGANASSERY, RESIDING AT KUNNATHU HOUSE, OPP.ICE PLANT, KUNNATHALLUMMUDE JN., KAYAMKULAM.P.O. BY ADV. SRI.K.JAJU BABU SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REP.BY ITS REGISTRAR, PRIYADARSINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR AND CHAIRMAN BOARD OF ADJUDICATION OF STUDENTS' GRIEVANCES, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM. 3. THE PRINICIPAL, ST.JOSEPH COLLEGE OF COMMUNICATION, CHANGANASSERY. R1 & R2 BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/04/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ WP(C) NO. 13067 OF 2007 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of April, 2007 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a fourth Semester student of the third respondent's college. He was dismissed from the college by Ext.P1 on account of serious allegations as contained in Ext.P1. The petitioner filed Ext.P2 appeal before the second respondent and now seeks a direction to the second respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 expeditiously. 2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as also the Standing Counsel appearing for the University. 3. In the nature of the order I propose to pass, I do not find it necessary to issue notice to the third respondent. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the second respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law , on Ext.P2 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. However, I make it clear that I have not considered any of the contentions of the petitioner on merits and it would be absolutely in the discretion of the second respondent to consider the matter on his own, as warranted by WP(C) NO. 13067 of 2007 :-2-: law. The petitioner shall also be given an opportunity of being heard before final orders are passed. The writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. sd/- S. SIRI JAGAN, Judge Mbs/ -True Copy- P.A.to Judge. WP(C) NO. 13067 of 2007 :-3-: S.SIRI JAGAN, J ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) NO. OF 2001 ------------------------------------ J U D G M E N T DATED:13-02-2007 WP(C) NO. 13067 of 2007 :-4-: