COURT OF CHW iceiianeous CiviS Case No.119 of200S I-HDI Ubheram, aged about 60 years, son of Shri Pyareial Marar, resident of Viliage Arsitola, Pafwari Haika No.60, Tahsii Dongargaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon ff^ .'i^r.s^. versus 1. Smt. Pawara Bai, aged about 75 years, widow of Late Shri sanshiial, residenf of KiSapara, Dongargaon, Tahsil Dongargaon, Distt. Rajnandgao" (C.G.) 2. Shri Jethu, aged about 47 years, son of Late Shri Banshiram, resident of Viiiage Umardah, Post Seimar, Tahsil Balod, Distt. Durc (C.G.) 3. Samund Bai, aged about 42 years, ','vife of Shri Lakhan Marar, dau.ahter of Late Shri Banshiram, resident of Kiiapara, Ctongargaon, Tahsil Dongargaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 4. Sushila, aged about 45 years, daughter ofShri Ramadhin, 5. Kaushalya, aged 39 years, Shri Ramadhin, ioth resident of Lokpur, Tahsil Dongargaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon 6. Ramu, aged about 74 years, son ofShri Bhagar, resident ofViilage Arsitoia, Tah. Dongargaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Appiicatipn for rsst.Oi-ation of S..A. No,943 of 1996 dismissed in defauit on 25-02-2008 resent: Smt. Savtta Tiwari, counsei for the applicant. ised on this 7 day -2- uHeard on admission. (2) For the reasons mentioned jn the application M.C.C. No. 119 of 2008, it is allowed. Second Appea! No.943 of 1996, dismissed in defautt on 25-02-2008, is restored to fite and be listea',^— :7 ansA>.ebD - D ^aDS^ <i?»r