cp460.10 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 460 OF 2010 Kadubai w/o Shankar Gore .. PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. P.B. Gapat, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.D. Kaldate, AGP for the State. ===== CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J. DATE : 6 th APRIL, 2011. PER COURT : 1 Learned AGP Mr. S.D. Kaldate has presented affidavit in reply on behalf of respondent no. 4. It is stated in paragraph no. 4 of the affidavit in reply as under : 5 The Deponent most respectfully say and submit that as on today there is no work in progress in respect of the road namely “Ghatshendra-Talner” road to the extent of Petitioner’s land under the control of the Respondent no. 4. If any work or development of the said road in respect of “Ghatshendra-Talner Road” is decided to be developed or carried out, then the Respondent no. 4 will obey the order of the Hon’ble High Court dated 20/01/1986 passed in Writ Petition no. 1090/1985. cp460.10 2 2 In view of the contentions raised in the affidavit in reply, instant contempt petition needs no consideration. Contempt petition therefore stands rejected. 3 Pending civil application, if any, does not survive and stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE dyb