c/?/^® IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BIL.ASPUR CHHATTISGARH ^0< _/200'? W.P.(S) No PETITIONER ..-•^ ^r// \.y\^'' •' V/w-. w^ Ram Lal Jaiswal, S/o. Shri Narsingh Lal, aged about 35 years Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School - Udangi, Block , Masturi, Distt. - Bilaspur (C.G.) ^^¥ f'i?" /' ^ ../ ^" • VERSUS I'f RESPONDENTS ^ ^! ^' 1, State of Chhattisgrh, Through - The Secretary Department of Education D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director,Public Instruction, Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur ^ xA ~^.^\^V^/i ^•^B^W '"^syi's^&'yy 'f' ^3. District Education Officer, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Block - Masturi, Distt. - Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTLTUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT, WRITS. DIRECTION ETC. TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P. fS) hto. 586 of 2007 Petitioner : ftnm Lal Jaiswal Versus Reqsondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh cmdo'thers SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J Mr. A.S. Rajput, Advocate for 1+ie petitioner. Miss Sunita Jain, Ponel Lawyer for the re^iondents/State. OR&ER (Po.ssed on 29th doy of January, 2007) The following order of the Court is passed by Satish K. Ayiihotri. J. 1. Leamed counsel oppearing for the parties jointly submit that the facts of the present case are similar to 1+»at of in W. P. (s) 5191 of 2(X)6 (Har Prasad Kurre and others Vs. State of Oihattisgarh and others), whiA w<is di^iosed of vide order slated 3 Qctober, 2006. ^- They further submit that the question of tcnw involved is also •the same. 2. In view of the above stated submissions made by leamed counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order datedl 3rd October, 2006 passed by this Court in W. P. (s) 5191 of 2006. No order os to costs. Thakw Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge