IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL No.319 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 22.02.2008 in W.P.No.27345 of 2007 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Lingala Venkatesh and others. …Appellants And R. Dayananda Reddy and others. … Respondents Counsel for the appellants : Sri D.V. Sitharama Murthy for Sri N. Narasimha Rao Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2: Sri E. Madan Mohan Rao Counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4: Sri R. Ramachandra Reddy Counsel for respondent No.5 : Sri M.V.S. Suresh Kumar The Court passed the following : JUDGMENT: (per Anil R. Dave, C.J.) After arguing the matter for some time, the learned Advocate for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the appeal. Permission is granted. The appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn. Needless to say that it will be open for the learned Advocate for the appellants to argue all the points before the learned Single Judge. ANIL R. DAVE, C.J. 19th March, 2008 R. SUBHASH REDDY, J. …..REGISTRAR ARS