-'v' ^i^r ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No._SSS^ of 2003 / PETITIONER : J*P*Singh S/o late R.D.Singh, aged aboat 50 years,| Dy< Manager(Marketing) IBP Co» Ltd., Va-noba Nagar, P.S. Tarbahar, Bilaspur (C<G<.)^ Ve r sy s RESPONDENT& / ..•' Q^< ^ ^ ^0< .,. .' J^ ^ •^' /•' <*^ ^ ^' 1. The Executive Director (Explosives) I.B.P. C0< Ltd. 34 A, llirraal Chandra Street, Kolkata-13^ 2. The Managing Director, IB^P. Qo, Ltd., 34 A, Nirmal Chandra Street Kolkata-13. 3. The Dy. General Manager (Mktg-S.^.) F 25, Ist. Floor, Tatya Tope Nagar, Nagpar -15^ 4. Dy.G.M.(HR-.c),IBp Co«Ltd.34A Nirmal Chandra Street, Kolkata - 13. PETJTION UNDER ART-ICLES ^ 22^/2^, OE_ THE COMST ITUTI^_OF IND3A i:i^E^S.:St&.iJJkti r^f^-— XI-HC-22 ^TT^T^T f^rlifh 37T|ST 5b^l<=b <11^a Y.'^ ^^? r<4N|^1<4, ^Tll^Ko, fa<rtl<4y ^W^M ^W^» 3:ni^r '^^K ..i^.;.f.-..^..Q.,l.E^3| ^-° 6 ^ 200 f^ST" 3TF^?T'^ITW^f^T 28/11/2003 Shri PrafuUa Bharat, o By fhis \vrit pctitio Constitution of India, petiti 15/10/2003 passed by resi has been traiisferred froin Maaager (Operations) to SMS Thc petitioner is wor Bilaspur m the respondent/c been nientioned that the p< April, 2002. The petitioner's was 88 tonnes aad 36 tonn been achievcd by thc failure of target of Deputy Grasim Cement aad L.&,T. C is under treatment of Neurc aad he has given represente response fi'oin the authorities I have heard leamed cc Learaed coiinsel for petitioner is M.B.A. graduat (Operations), where fhe petil for Mmmg Engmeer or the above requtrement offh^ <^Mi<rt<Ai ^i+i<A*'^'feT^ <fat$« '^-STf^^n^T |)unsel for the petitioner. >|a under Article 226/227 of the ^ner has chaMenged Uic order dated ^ondent no.3 by which the petitioner jthe present post to the post of Dy. Unit at Kiidreinkh, Kainataka. }diig as Dy, Manager (Marketirig) at lompaiiy smce 17/04/1998 aad it Iias ttitioner's wife died ui the month of service record is very good. The sale ?s upto Septeinber, 2003 which have titio^cr^ The pctitioner is harassed due to Maiiager (Marketmg-SW) Nagpur ia |ement Plant, Raipur. The petitioner Surgeon, BUaspur from June, 2002 |tioxi (Aiinexui'e P/3),but there is no (unsel for the petitioner, the petitioner submits that the (e whereas fhe post of Dy, Maiiager Jioner has been tr'ansferred, is m.eaa.t Che^uical Engiaeer. Therefore, ia view of |t post, the petitioner may not be able XI-HC-22 ^? ^ww^, ^Ti1^^j<o, f®t<rti^y ^T^T T^raf ^T^T'^I Rriicb 3TT|^T Sft^lct> ^l^^l ^ "M ^ .s^^ u ^1+1^11 ^q^——•———•——•———*—^:^ 200 •1^<T" 3TT^?T '^cff^T 'yf^a - o 2— to perform tiie dvity as per qualification of the petitioner i^ He farther subiidts that th| representatlon on 16/10/200^ froni the respondents. Theref] make a detailed representat^ directed t6 consider his repres^ Havuig heard fhe leame(] ?<rt<fli ^M^nt "^ Fs^l <F»i^i< ^^rf^TH^TI^T Ltie requh-ed stajidard because fhe M.B.A and not Cheinical Engitieer. b petitiouer has already raade a , but nothiag has been heard so far ^re, fhe petitioner may be allowed to on and fhe respondents niay be sntation, counsel for the parties aad haviag yegard to ffae facts aad circum^teiices oftlie case, the petitioner is allowed to make a detailed re^rcsentation raisiag all his grievance to respondent no. 1, who ia tur|a, will cousider the representation of fhe petitioner axid decide the ^epresentatiou witliiii a period of 30 days with areasoned order, With the aforesaid ob^er^ations aad directions, fhe writ petition staads disposed of. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge [^^r^ -^