IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 13082 of 2007 Between: G.RaviKumar S/o.Venakteswar Rao R/o.10-233, Kanchikacherla village & Mandal Krishna District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Acharya nagarjuna University, rep.by its Registrar, Nagarjuna University, Nagarjuna Nagar, Guntur District -5222510 2 The Principal, Koneru Lakshmaiah College of Engineering Vaddeswaram (PO), Guntur district .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring against the action of the respondents in not giving re-admission to the petitioner in IV B.Tech course in the 2nd respondent college for the academic year 2007-08 as illegal, arbitrary, and against the principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14,19 and 21 of constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to give re-admission to the petitioner in IV year B.Tech course in the 2nd respondent college for the academic year of 2007-08 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.CHALLA.SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents.: MR.P.HARINATH GUPTA The Court made the following : O R D E R : This writ petition has been filed by G.Ravikumar assailing the inaction of the respondents on the application submitted by him seeking re-admission in 4th year B.Tech. course and to complete the course in the 2nd respondent-College. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 1st respondent-University. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner submitted an application on 28.04.2007 detailing the circumstances under which he discontinued the engineering course. He requested the authorities to permit him to continue 4th year B.Tech. course. His application is stated to be pending with the 1st respondent- University. 4. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 1st respondent- University submits that no application, dated 28.04.2007 allegedly made by the petitioner is pending with the 1st respondent-University. 5. Such is the situation, I deem it appropriate to direct the petitioner to submit an application afresh detailing the circumstances under which he could not continue B.Tech. course and thereupon, the concerned authorities have to consider the said application and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with the rules and regulations in vogue within a period of two weeks thereafter. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage. No costs. ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date:16th June, 2008. cs ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRK}