IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26475 of 2008 VIJAY KUMAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 24.9.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is an accused for an offence punishable under sections 406, 467, 468, 420, 414 & 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner is to the effect that he stood as surety with regard to the release of the vehicle in question from the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate. Later on, it was found that the said vehicle was a stolen property. The learned APP appearing on behalf of the State submits that during investigation it has come that the accused persons, including this petitioner are the members of the gang operating in the theft of the vehicles. Considering the submissions and in the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The application is, accordingly, dismissed. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)