IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9525 of 2001 JAMADAR RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS 4 16.09.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. No counter affidavit has been filed till date. The limited relief sought in this writ application is for grant of second time bound promotion with effect from the due date i.e. 27.3.1983 and for which a recommendation is stated to have been made in his favour on 6.11.1999 by the District Animal Husbandry Officer, East Champaran, Motihari, which has remained un-acted compelling him to file the present application. The submission of the respondents with regard to any requirement of a time gap for grant of second time bound promotion and whether the petitioner fulfills the same are matters to be appropriately considered when the respondents act in pursuance of the recommendation. Let such decision of the eligibility of the petitioner for the second time bound promotion be considered from the due date within a maximum period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Needless to say that if the recommendation in favour of the petitioner is found to be valid and in order , the respondents shall be obliged to give him the consequential monetary benefits considering that the petitioner has since superannuated on 30.6.1988. pkj (Navin Sinha, J) - 2 -