IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.26361 of 2010 1. YOGENDRA SAH, son of Late Govind Sah 2. Mangal Sah, son of Late Govind Sah 3. Ganeshi Sah, son of Late Bhinak Sah Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 27.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioners are accused in a case under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 436 and 509 of the Indian Penal Code. The First Information Report is against 16 to 18 accused persons and out of them some of the accused persons have already been granted bail. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that case of petitioner nos. 1 and 2 would be of similar footing as that of the other accused, who have already been granted bail. He further submits that allegation against petitioner no.3, Ganeshi Sah, is of sprinkling Kerosene Oil along with the others and setting the house of the informant on fire. He further submits that there is a lot of litigation between the parties. In the circumstances, petitioner nos. 1 and 2, named above, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. case no. 10 of 2008. However, having regard to the facts and circumstances 2 of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to petitioner no.3 for the present. His prayer for bail is rejected. However, he may renew his prayer for bail after three months. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)