1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.427 OF 2003 Rameshkumar Lalchand Jain @ Shah .. Plaintiff versus Balkram Himtaji Sutar .. Defendant Mr.Rakesh Dave i/by N.N.Vaishnawa & Co for the plaintiff. Mr.S.Chopda for legal heirs of original defendant. CORAM : R.S.MOHITE, J DATE : 28th June, 2010 P. C.: . The chamber summons for adding defendant Nos.1a, 1b and 1c has been allowed today and four weeks time has been granted for carrying out the amendment. In the meanwhile, the advocate for plaintiff and the added defendants state that they have settled the dispute out of Court and they filed consent terms seeking decree in terms of the consent terms. The consent terms dated 28th June 2010 are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. The suit stands dismissed in terms of the consent terms. There will be refund of Court fees as per the rules. (R.S.MOHITE, J)