IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 11709 of 2009 Between: 1 Vasukuri Narisimha Rao S/o.Adayya R/o.Nadapannavaripalem Veeravasaram Mandal, West Godavari District G.No.2776 2 Javvadi Appa Rao S/o.Appa Rao R/o.Rayakuduru , Viravasaram Mandal West Godavari District G.No./6935 3 K.V.V.S.N.Prasad S/o.Subbarayudu R/o.Rayakuduru , Viravasaram Mandal, West Godavari District G.No.7548 4 Vasukuri Venkata Lakshmi W/o.Vasukuri Venkateswara RAo R/o.Nadapannavaripalem Veeravasaram Mandal, West Godavari District G.No.7572 5 Vasukuri Koteswara Rao S/o.Adinarayana R/o.Nadapannavaripalem Veeravasaram Mandal, West Godavari District G.No.1558 ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The District Election Authority/Dist. Collector West Godavari Dist. at Eluru 2 The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies Bheemavaram, West Godavari District 3 The Election Officer, The Rayakuduru Large Size Cooperative Society Ltd, Rayakuduru, Viravasaram Mandal West Godavari District 4 The Rayakuduru large Size Cooperative Society Limited Rayakuduru, Viravasaram Mandal, West Godavari District, rep.by its Secretary .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly writ of mandamus to declare the proceedings of the 3rd respondent Election Officer dated 8.6.2009 proposing to conduct elections to the 4th respondent society on 20.6.2009 as illegal, arbitrary,and the provisions of AP Cooperative Societies Act and the Rules, 1964 and consequently to set aside the same and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:SMT.BOBBA VIJAYALAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following : O R D E R:- The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded, and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 23rd June, 2009 bcj