IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 20TH JULY 2010 / 29TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 22328 of 2010(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- DR.CHANDRIKA T.N, MEDICAL CONSULTANT IN ANAESTHESIA, WOMEN AND CHILDREN HOSPITAL, MATTANCHERRY. BY ADV. SRI.DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN SRI.K.M.ANEESH RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DR.BIPIN G.I MEDICAL CONSULTANT IN ANAESTHESIOLOGY GENERAL HOSPITAL, ERNAKULAM. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.ANTONY MUKATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY 0 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 22328 OF 2010 (M) ===================== Dated this the 20th day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is a Civil Surgeon. Her grievance is that, by Ext.P5, 3rd respondent has been posted to Ernakulam and she has been posted to Mattancherry. 2. Going by the seniority list attached to Ext.P5, the 3rd respondent admittedly is senior to the petitioner. It is considering the fact that the 3rd respondent is senior to the petitioner that he has been posted at Ernakulam and the petitioner is posted at Mattancherry. I see nothing illegal in the said order. Writ petition fails and is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp