IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT QFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITIONNO. -2-C7^) / 200^' PETITIONER /•. Ful Singh Rafre, S/o. Samaru, Aged about- 40 years, R/o. Village- Nanapuri, Tahsil- Pandaria, District- Kawardha [C.G.]. VERSUS RESPONDEa'lTS .': :-;-I^^;^^ '; ' ''•""^^^"'..••^ ?^<^^/ /^2- Jomt Director, •^N^^ ^^-^^ ^ ^••^2^y~^ ..,,. ^•1- StateofChhaftisgarh; ; :Through : Secretary, Department Panchayat arid Rural DeVelopment, D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur (G.G.). Panchayat Evam Samaj Kalyan, Raipur (C.G.). i •€%1 [^^ yO ^ ^-^- (<3- Sub Divisional OfGcer (Revenue) Pandaria, District- Kawardha [C.G.]. /4-8ub Divisipnal OfGcer (Revenue), Lormi, District- Bilaspur (C.G.). 5- ^©GfaiefExecutive OfBcer, ; ^ ? ;Janpad Panchayat Pandaria, ^ Bilaspur Now Kawardha. 7&- Superintendent of Police, Bilaspur, District-Bilaspur(C.G.). /l- Collector, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.). ^8- Sarpanch, . Gram Panchayat - Nanpuri, District - Kawardha (C.G.). WRITPEtlTIONUflDERARTZCZ£22G/2270FTHB CONSTlTUTZONOfINDIA. '•5 •-'^^ Y ^•; HIOH COXXRT OF JUDICATURB CaiHATnSQARH: BHASPXBl Sln^e Baich: Hon'ble Shri Satteh K. A®BUiot»I,J. W. P. No. 2179 OB* 2006 Pctitioner : FulSmghRatre Versus Respoiidents State ofCfaIiattisgarh and ofhcrs Shri B.K. Chakrabarty, counsel fbr tbe pctitioner. Shri Satish Gupte, Deputy Gdvenunent Advocate for the State. ORALORDrai (l*t May, 2006| 1. Tbe pctittoner is worldng as Panchayat Secrctaiy ia VIUage Nanapupi, Vikas Khand Naaapxui, District-Kawardha. 2. The petittoner has filcd this petitiou, inaking aBeg&tions agaiast the Sarpanch aad Up Sarpanch ou fhc gTound fhat they are threatening to take action ^ainst thc petitioner. The apprehension of thc petitioner is unsubstan.tiated. There is no scmblance of any right, which can be considcred by tfais Court ia dus pctitiou. 3. Accordingfy, the petition is disnussed at inotion stsyp itself. Eipu^ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge