Criminal Misc. No.M-19065 of 2008 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-19065 of 2008 Date of decision : 18.9.2008 Satish .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent **** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. R.S.Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Mor, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. S. D. ANAND, J. The bail plea filed by the petitioner (who is facing a prosecution FIR No. 16 dated 7.2.2008 under Sections 323, 325,304 and 506 read with Section 34 IPC) was rejected by the Court of Sessions vide order dated 5.7.2008(Annexure P-1) by observing that the charge faced by the petitioner is grave and head injury is attributed to him. Learned counsel argues that the deceased died for want of competent medical aid and it is further argued that a period of one month intervened the impugned occurrence and the death of the deceased. In order to cement that plea, learned counsel has invited my attention to following statement made by Mst. Angoori, wife of deceased who appeared, at the trial as PW-2:- “My husband died after one month. He was not operated upon during the stay in the hospital. Volunteered till his death the blood continuously oozed out from the head of my husband. Criminal Misc. No.M-19065 of 2008 -2- **** The doctor on duty did not take care of my husband while giving treatment. He would not have died if the doctor would have taken care of my husband.” Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, it is ordered that petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jind. September 18, 2008 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE Note: Whether to be referred to Reporter: Yes/No