IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 23RD DECEMBER 2011 / 2ND POUSHA 1933 WP(C).No. 33100 of 2011(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- CHACKO E.C @ CHAKKAPPAN,S/O.CHERIYA, AGED 59 YEARS,MELETHVEEDU,PINARMUNDA, KUNNATHUNAD VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNAD TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.C.A.CHACKO SMT.C.M.CHARISMA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANATHAPURAM 695 001. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 682 080. 3. THE TAHSILDAR KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, TALUK OFFICE, KUNNATHUNAD. 682 011. 4. THE TALUK SURVEYOR, KUNNATHUNAD 682 011. SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.J.RAJASHREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC.33100/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1- TRUE COPY OF SETTLEMENT DEED NO.163/1957 OF SRO, AIKARANAD. EXHIBIT P2- TRUE COPY OF LATEST TAX RECEIPT DATED 2/8/11. EXHIBIT P3- TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 24/5/11. EXHIBIT P4- TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION DATED 21/6/11. EXHIBIT P5- TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION DATED 4/7/11. EXHIBIT P6- TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 20/7/11 IN WP[C]NO.19777/11. // True Copy // P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 33100 of 2011 J ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Petitioner submits that he and his brothers have acquired 38.1 Ares of land in Survey No.333/3 of Kunnathunadu village as per Ext.P1 settlement deed. He applied for fixation of boundary and finally, by Ext.P5 notice issued by the third respondent, he was informed that, on account of a dispute raised by his neighbour Sri.Paulose, he should appear before him with the title deeds. Petitioner says that he appeared before the third respondent as directed in Ext.P5. It is stated that in spite of it, so far, there has not been any progress in the matter. 2. According to the petitioner, the objector mentioned in Ext.P5 has filed W.P.(C) No.19777/2011 before this Court and that the case was disposed of by Ext.P6 judgment directing consideration of a representation made by him for rectification of mistakes in the survey W.P.(C) No.33100/2011 : 2 : conducted. It is stated that it is because of the directions in that judgment that Ext.P5 proceedings remain inconclusive. 3. In my view, if what the petitioner says is true, there is no justification for such inaction. Therefore, I direct the third respondent to conclude the proceedings initiated by Ext.P5, with notice to the parties concerned and as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/23/12 // True Copy // P.A. To Judge