-3D ^? ft ^^ S~grt. .fc?^: ^<^fE- Inthe Honble HishCourt of Chhattishearh at Bilaspur fC.G.) W.P.(S) No.5~886 2006 ^^^ <^%.'<k ....••• v'" Petitioner ............ Amar Singh Dewangan aged 47 years S/0 Shri Mohan LalDewangan, ^ssistant Teacher, i^L" LiovemmentrnmerySchool, Chandanbehari, Durg Tahsil & District,Durg. ]OW.--\!^-' ^•J^€^ '.P'^ ^••"/, ki.--" VERSUS y Respondent... ... 1. The State Government of Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, Education Department /.".•3.? T. fy-J); \.J -^ 3"'J T/^ o D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) , 2. The Block Education Officer, rrit petition under aftides 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ in the nature of MANDAMUSi Certiorari, Prohibition and other suitable WRIT or writs, Order or orders, Direction or -r-—ii^^a. XI-HC-78 SfI^T^R-li'* tWTsn^rshifqi Bablu t 7S! •^MWil, yTfld'KS, R<-tlti^< Ol.^.CS-/ -SS-^j qiHciraitTT^i 200 3T1^?TV^SR ('^rfg^ST) ?T(TRR Hf?cf SII^CT 31.10.2006 Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Shri V.V.S. Moorfhy, D Anju Ahuja, Deputy State/respondents. Heard. Order dicteted in ppei^ separatety. Aiftvocate for fhe Petitioners. :puly Advocate General with Smt. Gbvenunent Advocate for the Wifepfi'-T im?irit'fei^t rfSrezR ^sif^rsn^r Court, conunon orier is passed Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge P.T.O. 2.\ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISOARH AT BILASPUR s < Petitioaer Respondeats Petitioner Rcspondeats Petitinner Respondents Pctitioner Respondeato Pctitioner Respondents Petitioner Rcspondents Petitioner Respondeats Ptetitfoaer Respoiidents Petitioncr Rcapoadcats W. P. (s) No. 3208 of 2005 Ku. Shailja Shrivaatava Versus ; The State of Chliattis^u-h & othcra W. P. (s) No. 3479 of 2005 Ravmdra Kumar Sahu Vcrsus Versus Thc StateofChhattis^u-h & olliers W. P. (st No. 4176 of2005 Rreintel Dewangaa : The State of CUaattisgarh & another .T: W. P. fsl No. 4301 of2005 Ram Kumar Choubey Versus Thc State ofChhattis^rh.& another W. P. (a) No. 4308 of2005 Kashi Ram Shrivas Versus : The State of Chhattisgarh & anotfaer W. P. (a) No. 4343 of2005 Shaka Ram Soiigcrwa Vcrsus ; StatcofCliIiattisgarh&anodicr W. P. fol No. 4344 of2005 1 NeshwarPrasad Sahu Veraus The State of Chhattisjprh & another W.J'.fsl No. 4357 of2005 Rupendia Kumar Sahu Vcrsus Thc State of Chhatdsgarh & another W. P. (s) No. 4367 of2005 Ledadhar Sahoo Vcrsus The State ofChliattis^u-h & another a \; ly Petitioncr Respondents PfetitwiMa- Respondents Petitfoner Respoiidents Ftetitioiier Respondents PErtitfoner Respondents Petitfoaer Respondents Petitioner Respoiidcnts Petitioaer Rcsptmdcnts Pfetitfoner Rcspoiulents W.P.ta) No. 4416 of2005 \ Saat Aniaa Rcddi Versus The State odF Chhattisgarii & another W. P. fel No. 4438 of2005 Smt Bhagwati Vaishnava Versus t TheStateofChUatti^arh&othCTS W. P. (s) No. 4615 of2005 Gopal Singh Kosma Veraus The State of ChhattisgaA & anothcr W. P. (sl No. 4626 of2005 ^l : Smt. Vibha Vcnna Veraus Thc State ofChhatti^jarh & another W. P. (sl No. 4659 of2005 Suresh Kuniar Tiwari Veraus The Stote of Chhattisgarii & axiother W. P. {sl No. 4690 of2005 Hcinraj Ladeshwar Veraus fbe State of Chhattisgarh & another W. P. (s) No. 4696 of2005 : Manik tal Dcwai^m Veraus The Stete of ChItattisgpA & anoiQicr W. P. fs) No. 4810 of3005 Bramha Ji Dcwangaa Vcrsus Thc StateofChIiatti^^rii & anothcr Aad W. P. fs» No. 5886 of2006 VMSUS AnaarSmgh Dcwaiigan i The State ofChhatti^arh & anofher - :'?1 BIn^e Beadh: Hon'bte Mr. Justfce Srtteh K. jApdhottt. Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate far thc Petitioncis. Shri V.V.S. Moorthy, Depuly Advocate.General -witfa Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dcputy Govcrnmcnt Advocate for fhc State/tcspoxidents. ORDER (31«t0ctober,2006) The petitk>ncrs arc working as Assistant Teachers/Uppcr Division Teachcrs in the govenynent schools. In (he course offheir services as Assistant Tcachers/Uppcr Division TcacItCTS, the pctitioiiers have obtaiaed B. Ed./B.T.I. examination certificates on their own expenses bcforc 1.3.1999. Writ Petition (S) No.s 3208/2005, 3479/2005, 4176/2005, 4301/2005, 4308/2005, 4343/2005, 4344/2005, 4357/2005, 4367/2005, 4416/2005, 4438/2005, 4615/2005, 4626/2005, 4659/2005, 4690/2005, 4696/2005, 4810/2005 and 5886/2006 are bcing disposed of by this conunon order as the tocta and question oflaw iuvolvcd in tticse petitions are <»aunon. ^ Acconling to leamcd counsel for fhe pctitioners, fhc petttioners are entifled to two advancc mcremcnts in view of the decision of this Court in thc case of ¥ashwant Kumar BhgusdwaLVs. Munfcipal Corporation. Duift and another {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}. Thia Court in tbc case of Yashwant Kiuaar Bharadwaj Vs. Munxdpal Corporation, Dvzg and anofher (Supn^, came to the conclusion that the tcachers, who had obteined B. Ed./B.T.I. Exaaunation Ccrtificate on thcir own cxpenses, are covered by thc circular dated 24.12.98 issued by the State Govenunent of Madhya Pradesh. Furthcr m the mattcr of Smt Manoraina Shrivastava Vs. State of M.P. and otfaeret 2000 (1) M.P.L.S.R. 136 } the Madliya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Gwalior Bench, whfle consideriiig fhe cireular dated 1.3.1999 whcrein, it is provaled that tbc Assistant Teachers, wBo have acquired B. Ed. degree ,at fheir owa cost bctBrecn 23.10.1964 and 7.5.1973 shall be entitted to two advancc incremcnts, rcUcd on dccision in tfae caac of Ratesh Kumar Shrwastaya Vs. Statc pf M.P. & othera passed in O.A. No. ^1 Subhash 1632/99, dccidedon 12.10.1999 whereia it is obscrvcd fhat fhc cncular dated 1.3.1999 caiuiot be inade applicabfe retrospectivefy. Thus, a tealcher, may be Assistaat Teacher, who has obtamed B. Bd. dcgree before 1.3.1999 is eatifted to two advance incremeats. ; 5. It is pointed out by tearned counscl appearmg for the petitioners that the then State of Madhya Piadcsh had ffled a Special Lcave Petith?n against the ordera passed by fhe Tribuiial and the Hon'bte ^Supreme Court dismissed Special Leave PetitioH No. 1999/2000 fited against the oider of the TribunaL Therefore, fhe duiectioa to the eflfect that the ciroular dated l.3.1999 caanot be made appUcabte retnospectively, passed by the Tribunal, becomes final and the samc shaB be applfcabte to all llie Assistaat Teachera who have obtamed B. Ed. ocaxainatun ccrdficate before 1.3.1999. It is lurther substaatiated by a circular dated 17.10.2003 issued by the present State of Madhya Pradesh wherein the cncular ctearly states about the decisua ofthe Supremc Court 6. Leamed ciounsel for the petitioiacrs fiuther submits fhat fhe facts aad qucstion of law invohwd in the prcsent case are aquarety covered by deciston of fhis Court in the case of Yashwaat Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Miuucipal Corporation, Durg and anofher (Supre^, to which teamed, coimsel appearuig for fhc tcspondents fauty concedes aud agrees with fhe averment made by leamed counscl appearing for fhe pctitioncra. ,K.. ' .' ' - • 7. Acconliiig^- thc writ pctittons are aUowcd in tenns of the oxder passed in the case ofYashwant Kumar Bharadwsg Vs. Muukapal Corpora.tfon, Duz^ and anothcr (Supr^, subjcct to verificatfon of the fact as to whether fhe petitioaera have acquind B. Bd./B-T.I. Exainmatton Certificate on their own cxpenses as per the cireulara dated 24.12.1998 and 1.3.1999 and further whether they have bcen paid two advance increincnts or not No order as to costs. 8. A copy offhis order be placed on recoid in conaected matters. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge