IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 18TH OCTOBER 2007 / 26TH ASWINA 1929 WP(C).No. 29321 of 2007(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- C.B. STALIN, CHAMBAKKAL HOUSE, PERUMBADAPPU P.O., KOCHI-6. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM. 3. NIZAR RAWTHER, KANALIL HOUSE, KAMBIVELIKKAKOM, KAKKANAD,COCHIN-30 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/10/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 29321 OF 2007 N ===================== Dated this the 18th day of October, 2007 J U D G M E N T Ext.P6 is the judgment of the STAT, whereby the grant in favour of the 3rd respondent therein was set aside and the RTA was directed to consider the applications in compliance with Ext.P2 judgment in MVAA 33/02. The complaint of the petitioner is that further action based on Ext.P6 has not been taken by the 1st respondent. If as contended by the petitioner, Ext.P6 has become final as between the parties, there is no justification for delaying its implementation any further. 2. Accordingly, I dispose of this writ petition directing the 1st respondent to implement the direction contained in Ext.P6, with notice to the parties, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Rp