IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2995 of 2006 NEELAM KUMARI Versus MISHRIA LAL THAKUR & ORS ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Chandrashekhar, Senior Advocate Mr. Binod Kumar Labh, Advocate For the opposite parties : Mr. Pushkar Narain Shahi, Advocate ----------- P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal ----------- Dated, the 27th August, 2008. Mr. Chandrashekhar, senior counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter for some time, makes a submission that the junior counsel has now instructed him to withdraw this contempt application. 2. During the course of motion hearing, upon prima facie consideration of the matter, we indicated to the senior counsel that contempt application was not only frivolous and misconceived, it appeared to us to be an abuse of process of the Court and deserved imposition of exemplary cost. However, now since the contempt application is being withdrawn, we refrain from considering the matter on merit. 3. Contempt application (M.J.C.) is dismissed as withdrawn. R. M. Lodha, CJ Kishore K. Mandal, J Pawan/-