CRM-M No. 10388 of 2011 **** Manjinder Singh alias Gagan vs. State of UT, Chandigarh Present: Mr.S.S.Gill, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S.Toor, APP UT, Chandigarh. Mr. N.S. Gill, Advocate. **** This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in case bearing FIR No. 193 dated 24.09.2010, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341 and 307 and 326 IPC(which was added later on) registered at Police Station Sector 3, Chandigarh. On 06.04.2011 the following facts were noticed:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner was not only not named, his name surfaced for the first time when the charge against the remaining co-accused was framed.” Today learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that actually in place of the mentioning of charge framing it should be presenting of challan. The said mistake is corrected. Learned counsel appearing for the UT Chandigarh has accepted this factual assertion. It is also not disputed that specific role including the injury which attracts Section 326 IPC was attributed to some named persons who have been arrested and have been released on regular bail. In this view of the matter, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Let the petitioner appear before the investigating officer on 28.04.2011 between 11.00 a.m.and 3.00 CRM-M No. 10388 of 2011 -2- p.m. to get the necessary recoveries effected. The investigating officer shall release him on bail to his satisfaction, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE April 21, 2011 sunita