HKiH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASTUR Writ Petitiun fONa. 2572 of2008 PETmONER SPONDENTS Arvind Chandralar S/o Shri D.8. Chandralcar, aged about 24 years, 4 Year (Final Year) Stulent of B.P.T. Physiotherapy College, Budapara, Raipur, resident of Matra Chaya, near Shiv Chowfc, 1 lane before Sai Kripa Mandir, RajaTalab, Raipur(CG). VERSU8 -, 1. The State ofChhattisgaifa through the SecTetary, Higher Educatioa DqMTtment Mantralaya at DIS Bfaawan, Raipur(CG). 2. Paadit Ravishankar Shdda University, tiirough the Registrar, Pandit Ravishankar Shukla Umversity, Raipur (CG). (WRIT PETmON UNDER AR'HCLE 226 OF THE CONSITTUTION OF INDIA) tSB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Atmihntri. .U Present ; Shri Rakesh Anthony; Advocate fw the petitioner. Shri R. Ayawal, PaaelLawyerfortiieStats/respoadentNo. 1. Shri Neeraj Choubey,Advocate forthe respondeirtNo. 2. ORALORDER O'assed on 18*1' day of0ctober,20^) Rejoinder filed by the counsel fortiw petitioaer is taken on reeord. With the consent ofthe parties, Ihe matler is tsken up for hearing finally. The petitioner has Gled tfois petition, seekisg followmg reltefs: "1 .That the Hon'ble Court may kiadly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding Ae respondent Universily to producethe answer sheets of the petitioner ofBFT Final Year for kind perusal ofthis Hon'bleCourt; 2. That Ifais Hon'ble Courtafter perusal oftiie answer sheets oftfae petitioner; be pleased to command fhe respondent University for reevaluate the aaswer sheets ofallthe 4 feiled subjecte and Ifaereafter declMe fi-esh resuh of the petltioner. 3. That fhis Hon'ble Court be fuftlwr pleased to gramt suiteble and adequatBcompensation to the petitioasr on wfaose faulty checking of the answer sheets of the petitioner, forced to loss 2 preciois academic sessions and deprived.&om interaship, 4. That this Court may kindly be pleased to commaad the respondent University to provide 1fce photocoiaes of ansyver sfaeets of all the fitiled subjects which tiie petitioner demanded under 1fae Right to iBfonnation Act ^ ^w. ;^E^;--; 5. The This Court may kindly be pleased to impose exemplary cost upoa the respoadesit university; 6. Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper may also be passed in favour of the petitioner;" Learned counse) appearing fbr the petitioner submits that the reliefclause 4, with regard to a direction to tbe respondent University to provide photocopy of answer sheets, is not made available to the petitioner despite payment of fee and application. He further submits that in respect ofother reliefclauses, no pievance survives. It is brought to the notice ofthis Court that the petitiona- has made an application on 16.09.2008, requesting the Umversity authority to supply a photocopy ofanswer sheet, but nothing has been done till dafe. A letter dated 18.04.2008 (Annexure R-2/3), addressedto thepetitktner by the Public Information OfHcer (Confidential), Pt Ranshanfcar Shukla University, Raipur, has also been brought to the notice of this Court, wherein, tt is cleariy provided that on the basis of appKcation and on payment ofrequisite fee, the petitioner would be entitled to a photocopy ofanswer sheets. 5. On hearing learned counsel appearingibr the parties, it is evident that Ifae petitioner is entitled to a photocopy ofanswersheet on the basis ofletter dated 18.04.2008, addressed to Ae petitioner. 6. ^ In view of foregoing, the petition stands disposed of. In tiie event, the petitioner makes or has madean aiylication dong wifh requisite fee, a copy ofthe answer sheet shall be supplied to the prtitioirer, as per letter dated 18,04.2008, within aperiod oftwo weeks from the date ofreceipt ofa eopy ofthis order orthe application, as the case maybe.i No order as to costs. ^' Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge