In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 3021 of 2009 Date of decision: November 26, 2009 Bhushan .. Petitioner Vs. Vijay Kakkar .. Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Deepak Balyaln, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Y.P. Singla, Advocate for the respondent. A.N. Jindal, J The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the order dated 5.5.2009 (Annexure P/3) passed by the learned Additional District Judge (Ad-hoc), Panchkula. The respondent (wife) has been awarded maintenance @ Rs.1500/- per month only and the children @ Rs.2000/- per month each. The salary slip submitted in the trial court issued before implementation of sixth pay commission reveals that the petitioner (husband) was drawing salary of Rs.17439/- per month and now with the passage of time and that due to the revision in pay in accordance with the 6th pay commission, his income must have been increased substantially. As such, no grounds to interfere. Dismissed. November 26, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge