3wf'^iwivw, t»-<n<ti<is,Rwi»(i^< ..\^^.^o..^.&4-.- an^siw (ij<<ijd^) qCTOTaiTfq? ••^f^^-^"'-"^0'^-"^200 an^nwR-ii* cwan^CTa'wa; ?RiT8R^feran^?T PETITIONERS Lalit Ki about Tahsil 3. Anit Kitmar, S/o Balkrishan, aged about 37 years, Village|Bhelwa, Post Bhelwa, Tahsil Pharsabahar, District|Jashpur (CG) Shraw^n Kumar S/o ShriChintamani, aged about35 years, | Village Golklih, Post Turala, Tahsil Pharsa|>ahar, District Jashpur (CG) Vereu RESPONDENTS 1. 2. 3. 4. The Ch Farsabal Zila Shit Jashpur wror pETinoN UNDERARTI SINGLE BENCH: HO <»l<lfri'fl'l<ll*<rtl"'t'fcLcl xluit^ix ^3lf^H3TI^ST mar Toppo, S/o Shri Harman Toppo, aged 82 yeare, •rfVillage Seemabari, Post Bokhi, 'harsabahar, District Jashpur (CG) 4. Ligori Ipujur, S/o Shri Simon Kujur, aged about 39 years, I Wllage Laksad, Post Bhagora, Tahsil Pharsa|>ahar,DistrictJlashpur (CG) 5. Jasinta|Akka, D/o Puse Akka, aged about 36 yeare, Village| Sisringa, Post Pandaripani, Tahsil Pharsa^ahar, District Jashpur (CG) The Sta^e of ChhatBsgarh, through: tfte Secretary, Departm^nt of Rural and Pancha\rat Development, Mantrala^, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur, (CG). The Secfetary, Department ofSchool Education and Tribai, D|K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) ijef Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, (ar, District Jashpur (CG) <|sha Kendra Rajiv Gandhi Slnksha Mission, (CG) ^fcE 1S6_<»!THE CONSTITUTION OF INDn U. SHRI DHIRENDRA MISHRA, J p ^3 vj-cd ^l^lri^, u>Tl1<«<is,Rlrtitf^'' ^^ww ..^y.CS).^^^. ^200^ an^trqiTRi'ti* asT3(I^?TsPIT<R Barve 3n^?itracp (ijci(^ci^) B^IT8R^feT3II^?T ^ 10.11-2008:- Shri SomtentVerma.cou] Shri Ajay Dwwedi, Depu) No.1 and 2. Heard. The grievance of the GurujiQ Guruji for running They worked up to the year cancelled without assigning any| 2000. Learned counsel forthe rt petition at this stage. Howeverl representation against their rem< be fuittier directed to decide Learned counsel for the| representation against their same shall be considered and date of receipt of representation. | in view of the submission^ instent petition is disposect of witl] against their removal before being made by the petltioners, respondent No.3 on its own weeks from the date of merils *l^[ri<fl-1 illlriY^ffs'd •<Kn'(5;it ^3l)^It3lrt?T nsel fbr the petitioners. ty Govt. Ach/ocate for the State/respondents l^etitioners is that they were appointed as Edi^catipnGuarantee Schemevide ^inexure-P/1. pOOO and thereafter their appointment was reason vide order Annexure-P/2 dsted 1-11- ititioners submitted that he is notpressing this he prays for flberiy to the petitioners to Tife [wal before respondent No.3, who in turn may repi)esentation within specified period. State submitted ftat if the peStioners flle grietvances which are raised in this p^ition, the ^ecided within a period of 6 weeks frwn the made by learned counsel for tto partes,the liberty to the petitioners to file representation re|spondent No.3 and on si»h representation tfie same shall be considerad and decided by merils, in accordance with law, within a period of 6 receipt of|represeotation. Sd/- '. DhirenA-aMishra Judge