mGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS iV-W"~w^ss,^ •l.^.' Satro Writ Peflttnn No. 471 of2001 Smt. Nn-ajana Gorasia C/o N.L. Gorasia Behiikl Kali Badi Bcngali Para Sarkanda, Bilaspur (Chhattkgarh). VERSU8 1. Gum Ghasidas Univwsity Bilaspur throu^i Registrar, Koni, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh). 2. The Registrar Gum Ghasidas Umversity Bilaqiur (Chhattisgarh). (WMT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'Ne Mr. Satish K. Agirihotai J.) Present : ShriAlokBakshi, AdvocatefortlKpetitioner. ORDER (Passed on this 14th ofNovember, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for fhe petitioner subnuts that the petitioner appeared in M.A. (English) Examination for the academic session 1999- 2000. 2. The petitioner was declared as "fail" in M.A. (English) exaniination on the basis of marks awarded to her. T'be petitioner made an application for revaluation of her answer sheet. The same was done and the petitionw was again declared as "fail", as no change was fouad in revaluati<m. 3. Beit^ aggrieved; Ihis petition is filed seeking quashmg of result of revaluation (Annexure P/2) and a direction to produce the answer sheet before tfae court. 4. The examiner and valuers are experts in their respective fields. They have reconsidered the application of the petitioner for revaluation, and on revaluation, ao altCTation in marics was found. There is no reason to interfere with tiie decision ofthe expert. The petitioner has fiirther not made out a case to warraiit interference with the decision of the autfaority. 5. Thus, in view of tfae foregoing, tha-e is no merit in fhe case. The petiticNn is aecordingly dismissed. No order asto eosts. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge