IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.3299 of 2007 Between: B. Rosamma, W/o. Jayarama Raju, R/o.D.No.13-7-925/A, Vivekananda Street, Korlagunta, Tirupati,Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanms, Tirupathi, Chittoor District, Rep.by its Executive Officer 2 The Accounts Officer, Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanam, Tirupathi. 3 The Superintendent, Sri Venkateswara Poor Home, TTDs Akkarampalli, Tirupathi, Chittoor District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not sanctioning the pensionary beneﬁts to the petitioner, on her retirement from TTD service on attaining the age of superannuation vide Memo Roc No.11926/2006 dt.17-1-2007 issued by the 1st respondent as arbitrary, discriminatory and illegal and consequently direct the respondents to sanction forthwith all the pensionary beneﬁts to the petitioner i.e. superannuation pension, Retirement gratuity, commutation of pension value etc. w.e.f. 1.2.2007, as has been done in respect of other similarly staﬀ Nurses, and also award interest @ 24% p.a. from the date the petitioner became entitled for the pensionary beneﬁts and with all other consequential beneﬁts monetary or otherwise and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.V.JAGAPATHI Counsel for the Respondents: MR.D.SETHURAMI REDDY The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.3299 OF 2007 ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled questioning the action of the respondents in not sanctioning pensionary beneﬁts to the petitioner. Today, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the interim orders passed by this Court on 22.02.2007 in W.P.M.P.No.4207 of 2007, no further orders need be passed in this writ petition. In view of the above, the writ petition is closed. No order as to costs. ___________________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 14th November, 2008 IBL