‘ i I l N TH I " I 1 PETITIdNERS: /1. ‘ \ ‘ x 9 i V gmw g“ (W 4/ , ‘ @ O Q k E HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 5 M3 / 2010 Ajay Tirkey, S/ o Vishawnath Tirky Aged about 25 years, R/o posted at Prathmlk Shalal Budaama Nagar panchayat S1tapur Tah Sltapur . Disst. Sarguja (C.G.) SanJay Kumar Gupta S/o Late Devklsun Gupta R/o Posted at Prathm1k Shala‘ Bamlaya Sltapur , D1stt—Sarguja (C G ) Mane] Kumar Yadaw S/o Budhsa1 Yadaw Posted at Prathmlk Shala ‘ Khalpara, Krunmera Tah- Sltapur, Distt-Sarguja (C.G.) VERSUS ESPONDENTS / 1 State of Chhatusgarh . ' Through Secretary Department of Panchayat and Rural Development D K S Bhawan, Mantralaya Ralpur, Chattlsgarh _, 1‘ “x / 2 Chlef Execut1ve Officer Z11a Panchayat— SarguJa Dlsst Sarguja Chhattlsgarh 5‘ I ' t 3 Ch1ef Execut1ve Offlcer Janpad Panchayat Sltapur D1sst SarguJa Chhattlsgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE ‘ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA I R g HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No 548 OF 204.0 " PET'TIONERS 7 ’ L Ajay Tlrkey & Others i , I , , ESPOND I: : _ I r Versus ‘ State of Chhattlsgarh & others g I { s _ _3 , le Bench Hon ble Shrl Satlsh K Agni otrl J ’Sharmlla Slnghal Advocate for the peltltloners ’ ShrfIN N Roy, Panel Lawyerforthe State , /- t / day ofAprIl 201I0) med counselforthe parties ’ t ‘ Hea t it; w 4 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submlts that by press ' ‘ ( acknowledglng that the petitioners have fled certain forged docum ts fabricated documents) else It was threatened that First * Information Report wo dged agalnst them u Ho Annexure ~ P/1) the petitioners were I ed to file affIdaVIt I ‘ l f V’ v counse orthe petitioner submits that this petition may also be earned counsel appearing for the State/respondents REII ? II - " ai r - k " h 1 l e came Into conSIderatIon before this Court In Baunath :Others . and other the matter quashed release reservmg liberty to the respondent authorities‘ there o‘ do the needful In accordance With: Iaw after affording Prop pportunlty of hearing to the,“ etltloners therein Learned'r hav? examined the facts of the present case s well t et ‘ i as he dcsmn of this Court rendered In Baunath Prasad Gupta sura and l am r r _ elconsldered opmron that the facts are Identlca i n vrew of foregorng, the press release Is quase as e same shall nfb’t g pnt ot iven effect to However liberty Is reserved to the resonde uthontres to take approprrate steps after affording proper opportunit o’t ke approprrate actron 'g hereafter If need SATISH K. AO GNEITRI 5 (p) of . th l I Td th "a y t be _‘