':BS»., „!? mGH COURT OF CTEIHAmSGARH AT BULASPUR WritPettton (227)No, 3QI?6o!f2M8 PETITIONER : Ramji Verma son crf Sunder Lal Verma, ^ed abcwt 35 years, Panchayat Karmi, Village Panehayat Pipaibhattfaa, Block Bemetara, District Durg (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh tiwough the Secretaiy, Panchay^ and Social Welfare Etepartment, DKS Bhawaa, Raipur 2. The Director, Panchayat, Chhattisgarh, Raipiu (CG). 3. The Additional Collector, Bemetara, District Durg 4. The Sub Divisional Officer cum Prescribed authwity, Bemetara, District Durg (CG). 5. The Deputy Director, Panchayat and Social ttirg (CG). 6. The Chief Executive Offiwer, Jmipad Panchayat Bemetara, District Durg (CG). (WSTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF IHE CONSTmmON OF IMDIA) (SB: Hon'bIeMr.SatishK.Aarihutri.J.) '^^y^^"^~^-.^^\c*^^^T€y^^"T-^^~^'£7y%^^ c^^ -^ Present : ShriAwadhTripdUMy-AAEOcataArthepetetienCTs^. {rf,S''9-^e'Sl ^ ®.K;Bhaduri^ Eaad^sawyw^AeStateft'sspondMts^ ^-^ ,Jc .tfl£--€y-t±&-2^^-f»^^-Aa^^x--fex--Afc£^fa&----.---I.!><L-^';^j;'-^ ^^r^'Ld.^ ORALORDER "y«%:7'" (Passed on 1st day ofJuty, 2088) With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for heanng finally. 1. The petitioner has impugned tfie order dated 03.06^008 (Annexnre P/7), whereby, the Director, Panchayat, Raipur (CG), has declined to grant interim relief in appeal case No. A/-89/07.08 filed by Ihe petitioner. 2. Leamed eounsel appearing for the petitioner subniits that tbe Deputy Director, Panchayal, witiiout having jurisdiction, has passed the order dated 16.05.2008 (Annexure P/5) whereby, the petitioner was removed from the post of Panchayat Sachiv, wtthoat fdllowing due proeess of .^' 4.- E—r^ .'''--."•g'. l^ g 1 ^ ^--..^ ^ >&!. ^il-^^ !'a~as=-; ^ti^^f^: law. It is farther subnutted that tfae original cas» is pending consideration in Revision before the Additional Collector, Bemetara, Distt. Durg (CG). 3. Be that as it may, it a^pears that, sevwal cmies are pen(fing before the various authorities. One appeal is paiding considetation before Ae Director, Panchayat. It is tiierefore, de^rable that in the mtwest cf justice, the matter may be considered and decided in accordaace with law, within a period of eight weeks, on its own merit. The Direetor may consider the cases, which is pending before the other audiorities also. The petitioner is at liberty to file ad<ttti<aial (toeumeate of facts before the Director, Panchayal, withih a period ofoae week. 4. For the reasons mentioned hereinafeove, fhe petition stairis dfaposed of with the abovestated liberty. No order asto costs. ^^ Sahu ^f?''- Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge