1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 1330 OF 2011 (Gharpure Engineering and Construction Private Limited .v. Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri Anand Parchure, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri D.M. Kakani, Advocate for the respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. 04TH AUGUST, 2011. On hearing the learned Counsel for the parties, it appears that the matter is a contractual matter and the respondent was trying to invoke the bank guarantee in view of the recoveries which were, according to the respondents, liable to be made. Several disputed questions of facts arise in this writ petition. Hence, it would not be possible for this Court to entertain this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner can very well agitate his grievance before the appropriate forum. Shri Anand Parchure, the learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the parties were directed to maintain status quo by an order dated 16th March, 2011 and this order may be continued for the period of three weeks so that the petitioner can move the appropriate forum. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the ad- interim relief granted by this Court on 16th March, 2011 is continued for a period of three weeks. The same would cease to operate on the expiry of third week. The writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE *rrg.