1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 1633 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 1633 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 1633 OF 2008 Kamat Rohit Jagannath. .. Petitioner. vs. University of Mumbai. .. Respondent. Mr. Uday P. Warunjikar for Petitioner. Mr. R.A. Rodrigues, for Respondent. CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & K.K. TATED, JJ. K.K. TATED, JJ. K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE: 29TH JULY, 2008. DATE: 29TH JULY, 2008. DATE: 29TH JULY, 2008. P.C. . Heard. 2. We record our appreciation for the efforts taken by the parties to get the matter settled by accepting the suggestion made by this Court. 3. Accordingly, the answer book of the petitioner was given to a senior examiner who moderated the said answer book. Now the petitioner gets 73 marks out of 100. In view of this, nothing survives in the petition and, therefore, the learned counsel for the petitioner 2 submits that as he has now been given 73 marks out of 100 in the subject of Law of Evidence in LL.B. exam. 6th semester, he seeks to withdraw the petition. We permit the petitioner to withdraw the petition. The communication received from the Faculty of Law addressed to the Vice Chancellor copy of which was referred to the learned Advocate appearing for the University is returned to the learned advocate in sealed cover. Mr. Rodrigues, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent University submits that the University would extend all possible cooperation in the matter if the petitioner seeks admission to LL.M. first semester for the academic year 2008-09 subject to the petitioner being diligent in the matter. 4. Authenticated copy of this order be furnished to the learned counsel for the parties. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) ( K.K. Tated, J.) ( K.K. Tated, J.) ( K.K. Tated, J.)