IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16571 of 2009 1. MD.MODASSIR 2. Md. Suaib 3. Sakeela Khatoon @ Sugnu Begam Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 18.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that all the allegations are false and at the time of marriage (Nikah), complainant was pregnant. She delivered a female baby within six months of her marriage. So, in Mohammedan during pregnancy there can be no Nikah (Marriage). Making that a ground, husband divorced the complainant also, even then they are apprehending their arrest. In the case, marriage is alleged in the month of Baisakh(April) 2007 and delivery of the boy on 15.09.2007. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel. Prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Complaint Case P.S. Case No. 04 of 2008, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Sheohar, Sitamarhi subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)