IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.885 of 2011 JHUMAN @ JITENDRA YADAV ……Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 11.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 09.10.2010 in a case registered under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1- B)a and 26 of the Arms Act. It is alleged that on the basis of confidential information that five-six persons are making plan to commit dacoty in Makhdumpur market raid was conducted when three accused persons were arrested. From the possession of Mantu Manjhi one country made loaded pistol and a live cartridge were recovered. Impugned order suggests that petitioner was involved in Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 1566 of 2010. Statement has been made in para 9 that petitioner has no criminal antecedent but in the other case registered under Section 379 of the I.P.C. petitioner was implicated on the statement of Mantu - 2 - Manjhi subsequent to registration of the F.I.R. the police has submitted final form finding accusation false. Considering the fact that recovery has not been made from the possession of the petitioner, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 290 of 2010. Bhardwaj (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)