Lsp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1245 of 2008 Ashok M.Bhandagi ..Petitioner V/s. M/s. Gauges Bourden (I)Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondents Mr.V.R.Walavalkar i/b S.G.Walam for the petitioner Mr.Shailesh MOre iby Mr.S.M.Naik for the respondents CORAM CORAM CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. DATED DATED DATED : 25th February , 2008 : 25th February , 2008 : 25th February , 2008 P.C. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner. Though Reference(IDA) No.284/2002 made at his instance has been allowed partly and he has been directed to be reinstated in service with 25% backwages, the petitioner is aggrieved by denial of remaining 75% backwages as per the Award dated 28-8-2007 passed by the learned Judge of the 6th Labour Court at Mumbai. 2. I have perused the affidavit filed by the petitioner by way of his examination in chief and in the same there is no whisper about the efforts he had taken to seek an alternate employment. He was working as an Accounts Officer and has more than 25 years of experience in the management of accounts. I,therefore, do not find any error committed by the Labour Court in 2 denying the remaining backwages of 75% by the impugned order and, therefore, there is no case made out to entertain this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution. 3. The Petition is rejected summarily. [B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.] [B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.] [B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.]