IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18060 of 2009 MOST.CHAMELI DEVI WIFE OF LATE ARJUN PRASAD SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE HARIPUR, P.O. FUDKICHAK, P.S. GOGRI, DISTRICT- KHAGARIA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. UNDER SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, BIHAR, PATNA 5. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDCUATION, KHAGARIA 6. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, KHAGARIA 7. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, GOGRI (SOUTH) KHAGARIA. 8. THE HEADMASTER, MIDDLE SCHOOL SHIRNIA GOGRI (SOUTH) KHAGARIA. ----------- 2 21.12.2009 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner, who is the wife of the deceased employee, is with regard to the payment of correct amount of gratuity and the differences of salary for the period 01.01.1971 to 31.03.1973 which was deposited in the G.P.F. account of the husband of the petitioner have not been settled as yet despite representing the matter. Learned counsel for the State submits that although the husband of the petitioner retired as Assistant Teacher in the year 1982 and died in the year 2007 this petitioner is approaching this Court after long delay, and as such, the writ application is not maintainable. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for petitioner proposes to approach the respondent no.5 for redressal of her grievances in accordance with law. In this view of the matter, it is directed that in case such representation is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents in support of the claim, the above respondent may consider the grievances of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)