IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25954 of 2008 RAJU KUMAR @ RAJ KUMAR @ RAJ KUMAR SINGH @ RAJ KUMAR SINHA, SON OF LATE PRADUMAN PRASAD, RESIDENT OF MADNIMAL, P.S. HAZIPUR TOWN, DISTT. VAISHALI. ------ PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DINESH PRASAD SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KHILWAT, P.S. BADUPUR, DISTT. VAISHALI ------ OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 2. 13.05.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioner is aggrieved with the order dated 13.2.2008 by which the Judicial Magistrate, Hajipur, Vaishali has refused to discharge the petitioner in G.R. No. 2369 of 2003/Tr. No. 1540 of 2007. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the allegation against him is that he allegedly forged a petition in an execution proceeding and, therefore, he was protected under Section 195 Cr. P.C. since the complaint was filed by a private person. It is a settled principle of law that no protection can be given to a person in such circumstances and the protection is accorded only if the allegation of forgery is with regard to documents while in custody of the court. The application is dismissed. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)