'"F -*5,; ^K"A's.^'.y u- '•'£ii <?? )0Z)Z^- IN THE HIGH CQURTOF CJ-1HATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITIO (fi) N0.7/«OF 2007 4- PETITIONER •^^ ^•"y 'Gf^" /' \^i?'7\ - *-' ^p'" ^\f ^??' <f'~ l .-•'" S^f- t^ •<\.: VERSUS •^7-4^. lari Prasad Mehra, S/o Dwarika Prasad Mehra fr^e^-•^--"^ Presently working as Driver '»— Irr the Office of Divisional Forest Offieer, Forest Divn. Janjgir-Champa & resident of Forest Colony, Jagdalia Dist.Janjgir-Champa (CG) RESPONDENTS 1^ State of Chhattisgarh Throygh the Secretary, Department of Forest Mantralaya, D K 5 Bhawan Raipur (Chhattjsgarh) ,/»' .<2'W ^ ^^x^f^ '€^^ " PrinGipal ChiefConservator of Forest, Jail Road, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Chief Conservator of Forest, Chhattisgarh Raipur (Chhaffisgarh) Conservator of Forest, Bilaspur Circle, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Divisionat Forest Officer Forest Division, Janjgir Champa (Chhattisgarh) 6. Instructor, Forest Guard / Training School, Sakti Dist. Janjgir-Champa (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2^6 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARt. MANDAMUS, PROHIBtTION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS.QRDERORORDERS; 3~k AUL HK3H COURT OF CMHATTISGARH AT aLASnig SINGLE BENCti : HON'BLE MR. SATISHK AGNIHOTR1. J. WRIT PETITICWI (S.t N0.718 W 2W7 Pefitioner : HariPrasadMehra versus Responctents : StatetrfChhKtisgartismdotters Present : Mr.AshtshShmastava,counselfortt»pdffioner. Mre. Anju Ahuja, Depirty Govemment Advocate for Bw Stat^respondents. ORMR (Passed on 7th Day <rf F^ruary. 2007) Leamsd counsel appearing for the p^tfonw subnrite that s^ainst the order dated 27-7-2002 (P-3) passed by tt»eDlv^onal Forest Officer, Janjgir-Chamfa - respondent No.5, (he pettQtmw preferred an appeal b^ore the ConsenratDr of Forest, Btlaspur, wrtifch was dlsmi»ed by orcterdated 6-10-200 (P-6). /^ainst Uie saklorder ofdtendssal, ttie petitioner has Wwl an appeal before tt»F'rindpat Chltf Coreeiv^or of Forest, Raipur on 12-1-2004 (P-7). That appeal Is sffl pendhg considerafion. 2. The Prhidpal <3»efConsavaltor of Forest, Raipa- may do well in declcfing Vhe pendlng appeat of the petBioner expedKtously, preferablywithin a period ofttiree moidhs. 3. In view of the foregolng, the writ petitlon stands (feposed of. hto order as to cods. Certified copy as per rvtos. Satish K. Agnihotn Judge °?^