IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42591 of 2010 VEERBAHADUR YADAV @ VEERBAHADUR RAI, S/o Lallu Rai, R/v-Bhagwatipur, P.S. Bihta, District-Patna. .........Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ................Opposite Party. ----------- 2 19.02.2011 Nobody is present on behalf of the parties in view of call of en masse abstention of the lawyers given by the Bihar State Bar Council. However, I have perused the materials available on the record. The petitioner is an accused in a criminal prosecution registered under section 384 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. According to the prosecution case, on the order of Devendra Yadav, other accused persons including the petitioner are alleged to have fired upon the informant, but no injury was caused to him. There is allegation of demand of rangdari of Rs.10,000/- from the informant. From the materials available on the record, it appears that no amount was ever paid by the informant to the accused persons on account of alleged demand of extortion. Admittedly, the informant did not sustain any injury on his person. It further appears that matter has been compromised by the parties and a compromise petition vide Annexure 2 was jointly filed in the court of learned 2 Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur. The petitioner is said to be in judicial custody since 9.8.2010. It has also been stated in paragraph 14 of the petition that petitioner is a business man and he has got no criminal antecedent. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 43 of 2010, G.R. No. 370 of 2010. M.Rahman ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J )