S &^ K^- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P.(S) N0.'% ^ /2007 Petitioner y ^v •;Ss^f ';0?'l-/^r^.*'' %<E o'a'!'"'^.. "'\^' 'y VERSUS ^u.mudni Bai, W/o'"Shri Bagar Say, Aged about 25 years R/o Village Piparkhar, (Dhab Para) Gram Panchayat Amera, block - Lakhanpur, Tehsil - Ambikapur, Dist : Surguja-(C.G.) Respondents : l^" State ofChhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary Department of Women and Child Development, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur-(C.G.) The Commissioner, ^Q"^t€; ^ „ . . ^''(»*/^^/ ^^ Sanchanalaya, Women and Child '^.^ ^_r ^ ^^% Welfare Development Mantralaya 2^ 2, '^° \s Parisar, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Collector (Women and Child Development), Ambikapur-(C.G.) 4. The Project Officer, Integrated Development Project Lakhanpur, Dist : Sarguja-(C.G.) 5. The District Programme Officer, Woman and Child Development, Surguja-(C.G.) 6. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Lakhanpur, Dist : Surguja-fC.G.) 7. (2) Rekha Rajwade, W/o Shri Parenieshwar Rajwade, Aged about ^2A years, R/o Village Piparkhar, (Dhab Para) Grain Panchayat Amera, block - Lakhanpur, Tehsil - Arabikapur, Dist : Surguja-(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ...^. *? HI6H COURT OF CHHATrtSSARH AT BELASPWt Writ Petitwn fS) No. 923 of 2007 Petitioner Kumudu Bai Versus Reapondents Stote ef ChhatMsgarh Aothers Sbigle Bcneh: Honbte Atr. Juatice Satidi K. ^piiholri. Present: Mr. Hwrat Riyut, Advocote for the petilfoner. Ms. Oeepali Pandey,Pon<l La»ywfor the Stcrt'e/r'eqiaidents. ORbER y<B»edon l9*k Oay of Febpuary, 2007) The folbtriiy order of the Court NNW paaed by Srtfah K. ^lgnihotrl, J. 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petttioiw submits ttwt the a^»mhnent' of respondent'No. 7 is contruy to Aonganbadi Scheme, as her hutbond is a 6ovemment- employee and titao the responderrt' No. 7 has not applied for -Ihe post of Aan9<nbadi Worker, she applied for Aan9anbadi Sehcyika. He further submits that the petitioner has preferential claim ww respondent No. 7 for appointnent os Angwibadi Workw. 2. Be tharf' as it mcy, in the facts cnd cu'eumstancea of •thc case, •the reapondent No. 3 is directed to look .into thc altegation made by the petitiofier and p<as appropriate order in accordaneie iiii'th Aanganbcdi Scheme and law irithin a period of six weeks from 1he date of recejpt of a copy of -this order. 3. The mt petition is occordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. SuMwsh Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge