(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 359 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 359 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 359 OF 2004 Susheel Kumar Sharma ...Petitioner Versus Sarjit Singh Muncha Singh ...Respondent ..... None for the petitioner as well as the respondent. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 15TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 15TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 15TH FEBRUARY, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- . It is alleged in this Contempt Petition that the respondent has committed wilful, deliberate and intentional Contempt of the Bombay City Civil Court by filing false, frivolous and fraudulent affidavit in reply in Notice of Motion No. 4342 of 2002 in S.C. Suit No. 5857 of 2002. If that be so, there is no case of contempt within the meaning of Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Hence, the Registry is directed to place this petition before the appropriate Bench on the criminal side as and when circulated.