C.W.P. No.16724 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 03.10.2008 M/s Vipul Limited and others .....Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE UMA NATH SINGH. HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY. Present : Mr.Aashish Chopra, Advocate, for petitioners. Ms.Ritu Punj, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Mr.Vikas Bahl, Advocate, for respondents. -.- UMA NATH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for parties. Learned senior counsel for petitioners took us through Annexure P-3 to argue that this is not an order. However, we also do not find it to be a notice either, as contended by him. Relevant communication on record only admits that the licence in respect of land measuring 2.907 acres would be issued to petitioner subject to his completing necessary formalities, hence, that communication is not in the nature of a notice. Having been confronted with our observations, learned senior counsel for petitioners submits that he may be granted liberty to file an appeal in terms of statutory right under Section 19 of Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975. We do not find any legal impediment in granting such liberty to C.W.P. No.16724 of 2008 2 petitioners. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to petitioners to file an appeal under Section 19 of the aforesaid Act, within four weeks from the date of receiving a copy of this order, which shall be considered and decided on merits, within a period of four weeks thereafter. This writ petition, thus, stands disposed of. (UMA NATH SINGH) JUDGE 03-10-2008 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) *mohinder JUDGE