IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30934 of 2008 SATO MAHTO S/o Rama Mahto @ Ramu Mahto. Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 20.02.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is in custody since 27.05.2003. His prayer was earlier rejected by this Court with an observation that if the trial is not concluded within six months, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. That period had already been elapsed. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, Lakhisarai in connection with Sessions Case no. 1013 of 2004 (Lakhisarai P.S. Case no. 118/2003). shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)