6-0 <3.^.^.^A6":"1 p.R.ND...--s-""^"j_/s^.t2<;'^- B^1S^"--""- dated....—":'"—""'y W THB MIGH COURT OF JIIDICATURB OF CHHAmSGARK AT BII.ASPUR W.P.N0.2'S^5/2006 P]BT2TIONEg Stttt. Sohanl Bai Wife of Shri K.R. Bhagat Aged about 50 years R/o, Jashpur Tah.86 Distt. Jashpur (C.G,) VER8US RIESPONDENTS 1. State ofChhattisgarh acting throu^i Secretary School Education Department Govt, of Chhattisgarh D.K.S. Bhawan, Rsupur. 2. The CoUector, Jashpur Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 3. BttoclE Educatloa Ofltcer Jashpi-ir Dist. Jashpur (C.G.) %^^~^a^. '".tf'" ^.'^-iK.'.SS;"^"^' WMT PETITION VStXBR ARTtCLB 226/227 OF WRE CONSTITCmOM OF INDIA FOR ISSUARCB OP APPROPRIATB 5^IT/WmTO. ORDBR/OROKtS, WSSC7KWI DUUE»?nO»S EfC. XI-HC-22 3^-qFTRP)', ®Tfl'M'IS,RlrtKHy 3TT^T^^ch IIHCTI sn*iiw f^s SII^T^iT R-fi+sn^T StlHitlBf?^ StlHltl K' STI^TS+niWllfN' '7..-IS -'^f%/^^. ^ -jg-^yy^ AAr. M.K. Sinha, counsel for tl^e petitioner. M.r. Satish ©upta,beputy ©o^t.Advocate for the State/respondents, on advance copy. lion Sy the instant writ petilti Constitution of India, the petitior^i da+ed 7 July, 2006 passed by rssp) been tr'ansfer'red from Biock Secondary School, Narayanpur, Blocl),! The case of the petitioner Assistant -Srade-III at Ambikapur year 1990, she was promoted <s As^ District: Joshpur. Tliereafter, sh^ Office, Jashpur' 'm the scme year. from Block Education Office, Narayanpur, Btock; Kunkuri, Diatrict[ 71 July, 2006. The petitioner is a for various aiiments. He" husbanitl &epartment posted as Assistant Tea|: Learned counsel for the petip lody and she has made a decided. Therefore, he further to make a representation to res^ +i'iit<-i'in-f wrot' fffs^S ^resn: cti3T^tT 311^1 under Article 226/227 of the ler has chalienqed her transfer order i^ndent No.2, wher'eby the petitioner has Educ^ition Office, JoApur* to &ovt. Higher [•• Kunkuri. |s thot she was original.ly appointed as ijpder the Education t>epwtment. In the i^istant 6rade-II snd posted ert Manorc, was tr'cnsfer'red to Block Education ;, the petitioner" has been transferred Jash|3ur to ©ovt.Higher Secondary School, Jashpur" by the impugned order dated |ady and she is under medicsl trestment is aiso working under ths Education Tea|sher at Raigar'h. letfltioner submits that the petitioner is a ;enta1tion, but her representc+ion is not being rs that ths petitioner may be allowed ssp|ondent No.l and respondent No.l be (tft^y^) XI-HC-22 3TI^T9iT f^TOan^T ginRiflf^i a; Soma <»~ gsr^rai?FT, ^Tfly'i^, Rf^iuy 3TT^?T ^ach tTTHWI snHIW V^ 200 (c|0«S, STI^TgOTWlrfStT 2-" +|l|tcl41i-T Wttcff ff fSCS <Rl<-<,K ^grf^iTSf^Rr iirected to decide the scme, to i^hich learned counsel appeoring for the State has no objection. Hwing hewd learned couns^! for the parties, having regard to the facts and cir'cumstances of the ca^e and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the^ prayer maipe by learned counsel for the petitioner appears to be jiBt, faii" and r'easona|'ls. Therefore, the petitioner* is altowed to make a detailed representation a|inexing copy of the instant writ petition, raising all her grievances to responc|ent No.l within ten days fr'om today and in turn, respondent No.l shall decid^ the same within 30 days from the date of its receipt, considering al! the g^'ievmces raised by the petitioner, in an objectiye manner, in accordance wit^ !aw. With the direction aforesaidjthe writ petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.(VV.)P.No.302|3/2006 stands disposed of. Parties ars entitled for certifled copy of this order. Sdi- L.C. 3:h0£l00 judge (<fliy^)