IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 19TH OCTOBER 2009 / 27TH ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 18800 of 2009(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. BINEEB KUMAR, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.DIVAKARAN PANICKER, DRIVER, INDUSTRIAL TRAINING INSTITUTE, ARYANAD. 2. BALACHANDRAN NAIR, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.PANKAJAKSHAN NAIR, DRIVER, INDUSTRIAL TRAINING INSTITUTE, MALA. BY ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP SRI.V.VIJULAL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR & REHABILITATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF TRAINING, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL TRAINING, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. MS.ANU SIVARAMAN, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------ WP(C) No.18800 of 2009 -------------------------- Dated, this the 19th day of October, 2009 ------------------------------ J U D G M E N T The prayer sought in this writ petition is to direct the respondents to include the post of Motor Driver and Motor Driving Instructor in the Kerala Craftsmen Training Subordinate Service Rules. 2. According to the petitioners, by Ext.P3, the 2nd respondent has already recommended their case for inclusion in the Special Rules. But, however, final orders have not been passed by the 1st respondent in the matter. It is also stated that urging their claim, they have also moved the 1st respondent by filing Exts.P4 & P5 representation. A decision on these representations also have not been taken. It is in these circumstances, this writ petition is filed. 3. Having regard to the fact that the matter is pending consideration of the 1st respondent as Exts.P4 & P5, and as the 2nd respondent, by Ext.P3, has made his recommendation as well, it is WP(C) No.18800/2009 -2- essential that the matter is to be decided by the 1st respondent. 4. Accordingly, I dispose of the writ petition directing the 1st respondent to take a decision on Exts.P4 & P5, taking into account Ext.P3 as well. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months of production of a copy of this judgment. The petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this writ petition, before the 1st respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg