IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC NO.5066 OF 2008 RAM BILAS SINGH, SON OF LATE RAM SEVAK SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SUHI ANCHAL KUTUMBA, POST OFFICE SUHI, DISTRICT AURANGABAD ……………………………………………………………………………PETITIONER VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, AURANGABAD 3. THE TREASURY OFFICER, AURANGABAD 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, POST OFFICE AND POLICE STATION DEO, DISTRICT AURANGABAD ………………………………………………………………………….RESPONDENTS ********* 3 05/05/2011 The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that he has not been paid the dues that were remaining with respect to the schemes that were executed under the charge of the petitioner. The petitioner had come to this Court earlier by filing CWJC No. 8423 of 2005 for setting aside the order as contained in Annexure-1 which was a direction to the concerned authorities to institute a First Information Report against the petitioner, to initiate certificate proceedings for recovery of the amount and also to initiate departmental proceedings. This Court has quashed that part of the Annexure-1 by which there was a direction to initiate a certificate proceeding. While doing so, the Court also noticed that it was mentioned at Annexure-1 that an enquiry should be made with respect to the involvement of other persons who were responsible and Incharge of the execution of the schemes. The claim 2 of the petitioner is that although there was a direction of this Court to make an enquiry regarding the role of others in the alleged misappropriation of money due to non-execution of the schemes, this direction has not been followed by the authorities concerned. It would appear from Annexure-5 dated 27.12.2005 passed by the District Panchayati Raj Officer that while holding an enquiry, he has come to the conclusion that the measurement register was not available, which would indicate that the schemes were incomplete or had not at all been executed. Therefore, there is a suggestion by the District Panchayati Raj Officer, Aurangabad that there should be a measurement with respect to the works executed, in order to ensure that the work had been completed. As a result of the pendency of the enquiry and the criminal proceedings, the petitioner has suffered and therefore, there is a prayer that that the matter should be expedited. I accordingly direct the Block Development Officer, Deo, Aurangabad/the District Magistrate, Aurangabad to look into the matter and dispose it of expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. This writ application is disposed of with the 3 aforesaid observations and directions. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )