1 ca 510.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 510 OF 2011 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 756 OF 2005 1. Laxman Trimbakrao Paigavane and ors .. Applicants Versus Poonamchand Ramchandra Choundiye .. Respondent Shri D. L. Agrawal, Advocate for Applicants. Shri S. P. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 29TH APRIL, 2011. PER COURT : . This is an application filed by the present applicants seeking injunction against the present respondent from interfering in their possession. Shri Agrawal, the learned counsel submits that admittedly the present applicants are in possession of the property. Even the claim for injunction of the plaintiff has been negatived by the Courts below holding that the present applicants to be in possession of the property. 2 ca 510.11 2. The present applicants are the original defendants in a suit for declaration and injunction filed by the plaintiff. The defendants would not be entitled to claim a prohibitory relief against the plaintiff in the nature that the plaintiff should not interfere in the possession of the defendants. Though, the appeal is filed by the present applicants, the status of the present applicants as defendants would not change. In the light of above fact, the present applicants do not have any locus standi to file the application. As such, the present civil application is disposed of. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/April 11