&y-' '3^ -41'41<rl'tl, ESfllyis, ftclK-iy SVS^ 'q^T ('i?^'"^) •FRnw^ (t3iA?i (Single Bench; Hon'ble Mr. W.P. [s1 Nlo.212/09 (Petition U/A 226 of (;onstitution of India) Petitioner Roopnatlj Late Bhoj\ Foresterl, Jagdalpu^ Vs Respondent 1. c3+ Present; Mr. V. Koshta, Adv. for the petitior|er Mrs. Smita 6hai, Panel Lawyer for 15.01.2009 Heard. The petitioner was posted Division, Jagdalpur. He was ^aTSCTSil^t Justice tihirendra Mishray Pandey, aged about 52 years, S/o /grahi Pandey, at present working as Baster Forest Division, at ', District Baster (C.G.) 1-ate of Chhattisgarh, Through ; the '.cretary, Forest Department, D.K.S. Bfiawan, Raipur (£.6.) 2. C()nservator of Jagdalpur, Jagdalpur- Djivision, District Baster (C&) 3. bfvisional Forest Officer, Baster &|vision at Jagdalpur, District Baster (4-s.) 4. D[visional Forest Officer, Sukma F<>rest Division, District Dantewada (4.6.) he respondent. Forester in the Bastar Forest se^lected for Forester training ?PI WPI Usiulldl tM^K'IW—FS/95—11 /2008—1,00,000. 's^ ^ww^ ffTilyis, fqciray an^^i^raqi ?^rf^R ^i^fl ^^ •L For4st 2D09 programme vide order of Annexu^ same date respondent No.l vide q| the petitioner from Bastar Forest Division, District Dantewaj petitioner was relieved on 3.1.; Jagdalpur vide Annexure P-3 by However, when the petitioner g^ bivision, Jagdalpur, he was direct( the Divisional Forest Officer, bantewada as the petitioner has c^ of the order of Annexure P-2 on 1) Learned counsel for the pe( No.l vide order of Annexure Pt guidelines to the officers of transfer the Foresters & Forest petitioner has already submitted against his transfer order of however, the same has not been He further submits that this pi liberty to the petitioner to fil respondent No.l against his transl ^sv^^^^ <i^)<^i< "e P-1 dated 7.7.2008 and on the •der of Annexure P-2 transferred Division, Jagdalpur to Sukma jla. Af'ter completing training the for Bastar Forest Division, |the Director, Forest, Jagdalpur. ^ve his joining at Bastar Forest ^d to give his joining in office of Sukma Forest Division, Distt. Ir-eady been relieved in pursuance ^.10.2008. -itioner submits that respondent 1-6 dated 21.22008 has issued ^he Forest Department not to ISuards to another district. The |representation of Annexure P-7 P-2 before respondent No.l, <:onsidered and decided till date. jtition may be disposed of with l|e fresh representation before ^r order of Annexure P-2, who in Annelxure a!(yeT<l'ft?gSlTOraW.Hf<?!T.i—l;S/95—11/2008—1,00,000. ff'EQfc. /^\.^ g ^-:.^ B '<a u '^^^^^3' 3iitW'^lk;IW TL- ^^ r<ii<<ici<<, ®Ti)'y<fe,t^irey ^^* THiniT ^ftS 3)1^1 -\' turn may further be directed within specified period. Mrs. Shw, learned Panel in case the petitioner files fresh No.l within ten days from today same shall be considered and ded further period of three weeks] representation. In yiew of 4'he above, thi| direction to the petitioner to mal4 days from today, aleng with cer1 respondent No.l herein. On respondent No.l is directed to de^i law within a period of three week| representation. Consequently, I.A. No.l also| Certified copy as per rules. tt> consider and decide the same ^l^fi^^ )WH?fT ^•sifimsn^T Lojwyer for the State submits that tepresentation before respondent long with copy of this order, the ecjided by respondent No.l within a from the date of receipt of petition is disposed of with a fresh representation withjn ten ified copy of this order, before sijch representation be.mg made, fcide the same in accordance with from the date ofj"eceipt of the |stands disposed of. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ;s ^^•^"^^CT^n^lfq—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000.