(1) wp6623-11-group IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6623 OF 2011 Reshmabai Waman Madhe PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6638 OF 2011 Smita Dagadu Chakranarayan PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6561 OF 2011 Raju Sopan Bhujadi PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6679 OF 2011 Sangita Joseph Shinde PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6683 OF 2011 Pallavi Vasantrao Wanjare PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS (2) wp6623-11-group ..... Mr. N.B. Narwade, advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. P.P. More and Mr. D.V. Tele, A.G.Ps. for the Respondent-State. ..... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 25th NOVEMBER, 2011 ORAL ORDER: 1. The petitioners have basically approached this Court with a grievance that though the Respondent/Management has submitted the proposals for grant of approval to their appointments, the Respondent No. 3 - Education Officer has not decided the same. 2. Shri P.P. More, learned A.G.P. appearing for Respondent No. 3 - Education Officer, on the contrary, submits that the proposals have not at all been received by the Respondent No. 3. In that view of the matter, he submits, there is no question of deciding the proposals. 3. Shri Dighe, learned counsel appearing for the applicants-Intervenors, on the contrary, submits that the Intervenors are the persons, who are duly (3) wp6623-11-group selected and were in the employment of Respondent No. 2, were terminated and when the termination was challenged before the learned School Tribunal, the Management has made a statement before the learned School Tribunal that the applicants-Intervenors would be absorbed as and when the vacancies arise. It is, therefore, submitted that the services of the petitioners cannot be approved unless the claims of the applicants-Intervenors are satisfied. 4. In that view of the matter, we find that the following order would meet the ends of justice. "The Respondent/Management shall submit the proposals to the Respondent No. 3 - Education Officer within a period of two weeks from today. On such proposals being submitted, the Respondent NO. 3 - Education Officer shall take appropriate decision thereon within four weeks therefrom, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the Respnodent/Management, to the petitioners so also to the applicants/Intervenors." (4) wp6623-11-group 5. With the above order, all the writ petitions stand disposed of. [M.T. JOSHI, J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] npj/wp6623-11-group