IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1364 of 2011 PINTU PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.02.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 420, 272, 233/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 47(A) of the Excise Act. It is alleged that 1391 liters foreign liquors, 2930 liters country made liquor and 352 Masaledar liquors were recovered. The petitioner’s name sprang up on the statement of the accused who was caught on spot and was trying to contact this petitioner with regard to the papers of the alleged seized liquors. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the house does not belong to the petitioner rather it belonged to one Rajendra Prasad which was taken on rent by one Arun Kumar Singh who was licensee. Let the learned court below release the petitioner above named on bail on verifying of the fact that from the place - 2 - seizure has been made it does not belong to the petitioner in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Barhara(Krishnagarh) P.S. Case No. 258 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Bhojpur, Ara, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)