1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7571 OF 2008 Aalhad P. Parulekar ....Petitioner V/s. Balkrishna V. Jagtap ....Respondent Mr.R.S. Datar for the Petitioner. Mr.S.G. Karandikar for the Respondent. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 25TH FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C. :- 1. Rule. By consent Rule is made returnable and heard forthwith. 2. By an order dated 3.4.2009, the hearing of this Petition was deferred and the S.D.O., Kankavli was directed to finally dispose of the tenancy appeals filed by the Respondent as well as the landlord of the suit property. The S.D.O. subsequently decided the matter against the Petitioner. There are no instructions as to whether the matter has been carried in appeal. 3. In any event, as the issue of tenancy is being decided in separate proceedings, no purpose will be served by keeping this Writ Petition pending. The rights of the parties at least to some extent may be affected by the outcome of those proceedings. 4. In the circumstances, the Writ Petition is disposed of with 2 liberty to the parties to apply afresh to the trial Court including for the same reliefs based upon the tenancy proceedings. All the rights and contentions of the parties including those in the present Writ Petition are kept open. There shall be no order as to costs.