IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 12249 of 2008. Decided on: October 28, 2010. Mangat Ram Gupta …..Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & ors. ….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K.Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner: Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The Writ Petition is filed with the following prayer: “i) That the respondents may be directed to release a sum of Rs. 38,000/- to the applicant forthwith alongwith interest.” 2. It is seen that the matter was earlier considered by the erstwhile Tribunal leading to the order in O.A. No. 1906 of 2002. Be that as it may. The un-disputed factual position is that in case the petitioner is able to reconcile and settle the objected amount, respondents have no objection to disburse the same. Therefore, the petitioner may appear before the 3rd respondent on 29.11.2010, on which date, steps shall be taken either by the 3rd respondent or the competent authority to settle the remaining dispute with regard to the withheld amount. That process shall be completed either by 3rd respondent or the competent authority within a period of one month. Subject to the outcome of the process as above, the benefits to which the petitioner is found entitled, shall be disbursed within another one month 2 3. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. October 28, 2010. ( Justice V.K. Sharma ), (karan/vs) Judge.