IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Revn. No. 1684 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION : 13.11.2006 Sudhir Badhwar .... PETITIONER Versus State of Haryana ..... RESPONDENT CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. R.S. Rai, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Mor, Senior DAG, Haryana. * * * Counsel for the petitioner states that since the petitioner has been acquitted by the trial court, therefore, this revision petition against the order, framing charge, has become infructuous. Dismissed as having become infructuous. November 13, 2006 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE