^' c.^.^f IN THE HON»BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER W. P. S. N0.5^^ ^ OF 2010 Bharat Lal Baghel S/o Shri Amal Say Baghel, aged about-44 years, Panchayat Secretary R/o village- Karanji, Tahsil- Kondagaon, Distt. Baster (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENT^,, 1 ~ss/ ^"x^ ^''.(^ 'zy^' /^" •^"^" / "y/ / ?1-.^FJ^ ^' 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. '^^,. 'W -v ^' "'.. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Panchayat and Social Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) Director, Panchayat and Social Welfare, Raipur, (C.G.). Deputy Director, Panchayat and Social Welfare, Jagdalpur, Distt. Baster (C.G.) Collector, Jagdalpur Distt. Baster (C.G. Sub Divisional Officer (R), Kondagaon Distt. Baster (C.G.) Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Jagadalpur, Distt. Baster (C.G.). Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat- Karanji, Janpad Panchayat, Kondagaon, Distt. Baster (C.G.). Nawal Ram Netam S/o T. Ram Netam, aged about-28 years, R/o village- Karanji, Tahsil- Kondagaon, Distt. Baster (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner respectfully begs to submit as under:- HICTEiCOURT QF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA.J. '? \^^F PETITIONER Writ Petition fS) No. 2841/2010 Bharat Lal Baghel Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh and others Petition u/A 226 of the Constitution of Indja Appearance: Shri M. K. Sinha, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL-ORDER (Passedon21.6.2010) 1. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that on certain allegations, respondent No.3/Dy. Director, Panchayat 85 Social Welfare, Jagdalpur passed an order on 1.2.2006 (Annexure P-1) withdrawing charge of the office of Panchayat Secretary from the petitioner. Thereafter, on 15.9.2006, enquiry report was submitted to the Sub- Divisional Officer (R), Kondagaon and on 5.9.2008, an order was passed for recovery of an amount of Rs. 18,830/- from the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner had deposited the aforesaid amount ofRs.18,830/- on 13.10.2008 and has been making repeated representations for his reinstatement, to respondent No.3/Dy. Director, Panchayat 85 Social Welfare, Jagdalpur as also to the State Government, but so far, no decision has been taken. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondents may be directed to consider his representation. mr~~"~ •^^. [/r'"..,^ "^"^ fxy^j .<S;' 1''''" ^-^.y -2- 3. Learned counsel for respondent-State submits that if such representations have been made, the same shall be decided in accordance with law. 4. In view of the aforesaid submissions made, this petition is finally disposed off placing aforesaid submission on record. It would be open for the respbndent-authorities to take decision on the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law. 5. Needless to emphasise, if the grievance of the petitioner is not redressed, it would be open for the petitioner to take recourse to such remedy as may be available to him under the law. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge Praveen