IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 28202 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.09.2011 Joginder Singh alias Billu and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Jasdev Singh Brar, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. RAJESH BINDAL, J. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that only offence in the FIR in the present case, which is non-bailable is Section 452 IPC. All the injuries allegedly suffered by the brother of the complainant were found to be simple. In fact, the petitioners have been falsely implicated. Aunt of petitioner No.1, who is Panch of the village, where the complainant resides, there is some dispute between them. Learned counsel for the State did not dispute the fact that injuries allegedly suffered by the brother of the complainant were found to be simple. The relations of petitioner No.1 with KulwantKaur, Panch of the village, in which the complainant resides are admitted in the FIR itself. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering submissions made above, in my opinion, custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not required. They are directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on 12.10.2011 at 10.00 A.M. to join investigation. In case of arrest, they shall be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer. They shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called upon for further investigation. They shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 29.09.2011 sharmila