IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN MONDAY, THE 2ND NOVEMBER 2009 / 11TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 31049 of 2009(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- RESHMA K., D/O.K.K.RAMADAS, AREEKATTU HOUSE, SANTHI GRAM, MANCHERI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.MADHU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFIC OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY SRI. P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 31049 OF 2009 -------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of November, 2009 J U D G M E N T Heard Sri. Madhu.T, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. P.C.Sasidharan, the learned standing counsel appearing for the Calicut University. 2. The petitioner appeared for the 6th semester B.Tech degree examination in Computer Science and Engineering held in December, 2008 by the Calicut University. The results were published in August 2009. The petitioner failed in the paper “Graph Theory and Combinatorics”. She has therefore applied for revaluation of her answer script by submitting Ext.P1 application dated 31.8.2009. It is stated that the requisite fee has also been paid. The petitioner submits that she had in the meanwhile completed her studies and has passed all the other semester examinations. She submits that she had done well in the examination and that if her answer script is revalued, she is sure to secure a pass. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to take steps to revalue her answer script expeditiously. W.P.(C) No. 31049/09 2 3. Sri.P.C.Sasidharan, the learned standing counsel appearing for the Calicut University submits that the University will revalue the petitioner's answer script and communicate the result to her expeditiously, if her application is otherwise in order. In the light of the said submission, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to take steps to have the petitioner's answer script described in Ext.P1 application revalued and to communicate the result to her within six weeks from the date on which the petitioner produces a certified copy of this judgment before the Controller of Examinations, University of Calicut. P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE vps W.P.(C) No. 31049/09 3