IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 336 of 2010 Shaikh v. The State of Maharashtra ..................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr A.A. Naik, Advocate for applicant Mr K.S. Dhote, APP and Mr F.T. Mirza, Adv with him to assist the prosecution. Coram : A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 9th March 2010 1. Criminal Application No. 311 of 2009 to assist learned APP is allowed. 1. Criminal Application No. 336 of 2010 : Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned APP for State. Learned counsel for applicant submits that no specific role is attributed to the applicant and there is confusion about identity also. Accusations are serious in nature and there was assault committed by unlawful assembly, members of which were armed with deadly weapons. It appears from the statement of first-informant, she has referred the applicant as “Rafiq Mansuri”. It appears that earlier applicant had moved learned Sessions Judge, Amravati who by order dated 21st January 2010 rejected prayer for grant of bail. 2. Learned APP submits that even though charge-sheet is filed, State is seeking to hold further investigation and supplimentary charge-sheet, if necessary, shall be filed. It is contended that for that purpose, custodial interrogation of the applicant is necessary. It is revealed that as against present applicant, investigation is not yet over. For these reasons, although co-accused is granted bail, I am not inclined to grant bail to the present applicant. Application is rejected. However, applicant will be at liberty to apply for regular bail after investigation under Section 173 (8) Cr.P.C. is over. However, further investigation as against the applicant shall be completed within a period of one month if it is intended. Application disposed of accordingly. Judge. Hsj