IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 17TH DECEMBER 2009 / 26TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 RSA.No. 1092 of 2003() ---------------------- AS.116/1994 of II ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM OS.2484/1989 of III ADDL.MUNSIFF COURT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM .................... APPELLANT/ADDL.APPELLANT/2ND DEFENDANT ---------------------------------------------------------- K. CHANDRIKA, T.C. 4/2313/(M), `SHRIDI', KURAVANKONAM, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV.SRI.S.EASWARAN RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS1, 3 TO 6 & 8 TO 14//PLAINTIFFS & DEFENDANTS 3 TO 7 ------------------------------------------------ 1. K. PRASANNAKUMARI, RESIDING IN T.C. 1406, KOCHUMATATHIL, THAMPANOOR, CHENGAZHAZZERY VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. P. SREELATHA OF DO. DO. 3. P. LEKHA OF DO. DO. 4. DR. GOPAKUMAR, RESIDING IN `REVATHI', PATTOM, MADATHUVILAKOM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. K. PREMAKUMARI, RESIDING IN `SANGEETHA', VANCHIYOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6. N. ANIL, RESIDING AT 1/10, JAWAHAR NAGAR, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 7. C. ASHA N. KUMAR, OF DO. DO. 8. P. RAMACHANDRAN, RESIDING IN PYLINGAL HOUSE, KALADI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 9. K. SURENDRAN, DHARMA MUDUMPA VEEDU, T.C. 22/1687, KALADI MURI, IRANIMUTTOM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. RSA 1092/2003 2 10. SMITHA, D/O RAMACHANDRAN, PHYLINGAL HOUSE, KALADY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 11. N. LATHA, W/O.R.MOHANA PRASAD, RESIDING AT T.C. 1406, KOCHUMATATHIL, THAMPANOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 12. L. SUNETHA, D/O LATE R. MOHANA PRASAD, DO. DO. ADV. SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH FOR R1,R4 & R5 THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- R.S.A.No.1092 of 2003 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of December, 2009. JUDGMENT Learned counsel for appellant submits that he has no instruction from the appellant. 2. Case is being posted for curing the defects. Steps were ordered on 28.10.2009 and then on 25.11.2009 but still, steps are not taken. Learned counsel for appellant submits that a registered letter was sent to the appellant well on time requiring appellant to take necessary steps but the registered letter has been returned with the endorsement that “house locked, Absent”. Sufficient opportunity was given to the appellant to take steps. That has not been availed. Hence the appeal is dismissed for default. I.A.No.1330 of 2003 will stand dismissed. THOMAS P.JOSEPH, Judge. cks