THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.10516 OF 1995 ORAL ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed seeking a declaration that the action of the 2nd respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer, Narsipatnam, in approving the list of beneficiaries vide proceedings dated 28.4.1995 is arbitrary and illegal. Under the impugned proceedings, the 2nd respondent has approved the list of beneficiaries for allotment of houses under BC category to Bhurugupalam Gram Panchayat under the Pucca Housing Scheme sanctioned by the 1st respondent vide proceedings dated 9.2.1995. It is alleged by the petitioner that the beneficiaries mentioned in the list approved by the 2nd respondent were already having pucca houses in the same village. It is also pleaded that as a matter of fact, 153 applicants whose names were mentioned in the annexure to this writ petition were genuine and needy persons, but the respondents did not consider their applications and without consulting the petitioner, who claims to be the Ex-Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat, the impugned proceedings were issued approving the list of beneficiaries. At the outset, it is to be noted that none of the applicants whose request was not allegedly considered is a party to this writ petition. Admittedly, the petitioner, who claims to be the Ex-Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat, was not an applicant. In the circumstances, the writ petitioner, who cannot be said to be an aggrieved person, cannot maintain this writ petition. That apart, the petitioner has also failed to make the beneficiaries under the impugned proceedings dated 28.4.1995, whose rights would be affected, in case the allegations made by the petitioner are accepted. As a matter of fact, even a copy of the impugned proceedings dated 28.4.1995 has not been placed before this Court. Hence, the interference by this Court is not warranted. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. ______________ (G. ROHINI, J.) 22nd August, 2006. Kgr THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.10516 OF 1995 22nd August, 2006. Between: R. Yerra Pathrudu. .. Petitioner. And The District Collector/Chairman, A.P. State Housing Corporation, Visakhapatnam and others. .. Respondents.