IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-32058 of 2011 Date of decision: 15.12.2011 Amarpati and others ....Petitioners Vs. State of State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. PRESENT: Mr. Sandeep K. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Sushma Chopra, Addl. A.G. Haryana. **** M.M.S. Bedi, J. (Oral) The petitioners were on regular bail in a case registered under Section 306 IPC. After examination of Pws Daya Nand, Ranbir and Veer Bhan PW-6, the trial Court opted to frame alternative charge under Section 302 IPC. On 09.09.2011, amending the charge on said date. The petitioners, who were present in Court were taken in custody. The petitioners have been custody w.e.f. 09.09.2011. Veer Bhan PW-6 is uncle of the deceased, who has deposed in the Court that his nephew had been administered poison by the petitioner. Petitioner No.3 is wife of the deceased whereas, petitioner Nos.1 and 2 are her parents. They, having not misused their liberty and having not made any attempt to tamper with the evidence, they can be granted concession of bail. Petition is allowed. Petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on their furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. December 15, 2011 (M.M.S. BEDI) harjeet JUDGE