IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 3RD JULY 2008 / 12TH ASHADHA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 722 of 2008(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.13185/2008 Dated 16/04/2008 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WP(C): ------------------------------------------------ K.A. JALEEL, SHAHIL CASHEWS, VILANGARA P.O., UMMANNOOR, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.S.ABDUL RAZZAK RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- SRI. SALIM RAJ (AGED ABOUT 50, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE,KOTTARAKARA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.VINOD CHANDRAN. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/07/2008, ALONG WITH RP NO. 635 OF 2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J. ================================== Cont.Case (C)No.722 of 2008 ================================== Dated this the 3rd day of July, 2008. ORDER R.P.No.635 of 2008 seeking review of the order, which forms the foundation of contempt case, has been disposed of today with certain directions and clarifications, however not interfering with the interim order dated 16-4-2008 in WP(C)No.13185 of 2008. This means that, in giving effect to that order, the writ petitioner has to provide such materials as are required to satisfy the conditions imposed in the interim order dated 16-4-2008. The learned special Government Pleader for Taxes states that though the writ petitioner had attempted to provide a bond for Rs.1.5 lakhs, the value of the movables would be much lower than that and he cannot be permitted to inflate such value and still further that there was no bond provided in such form as is normally done. It is also stated that COC722/08 -:2:- no necessary accompanying documents were produced. It is specifically stated that solvency certificate regarding the person executing the bond is also to be provided in support of the bond. 2. For the aforesaid reasons, I am clear in my mind that no case of contempt is made out, as of now, and the Tahsildar will, on appearance of the petitioner, finalise the form of the bond and also take any application that the petitioner may file for the issuance of solvency certificate or other document, as may be necessary and take final action thereon, within a period of one week therefrom. If the bond is produced following such procedure, the interim order shall be given effect to subject to the result of the writ petition. Petitioner is directed to appear before the Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Kottarakkara on 5-7-2008. Petitioner will be at liberty to produce copies of the order in contempt case and the review petition before the COC722/08 -:3:- Tahsildar. Issue certified copies to the learned special Government Pleader for Taxes also. Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, Judge. sl.