1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5857 OF 2010 Aryan Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Nanded, Registered Public Trust Under Bombay Public Trust Act and Registered Society under Societies Registration Act, Through its Chairman - Ashok s/o Pandurangrao Terkar, Aged : 59 years, Occu. Social Service, R/o Near Bhagya Nagar, Nanded, Taluka and District Nanded ..PETITIONER VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 400 032 2. The Deputy Director of Education, Nanded 3. The Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Nanded ..RESPONDENTS Mr M.V. Deshpande, Advocate for the petitioner; Mr S.K. Kadam, A.G.P. for respondents no.1 & 2; Mr S.B. Pulkundwar, Advocate for respondent no.3. CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ DATE : 6th July, 2010 2 ORAL JUDGMENT [ PER P.V. HARDAS , J ] Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission. 2. At the outset, Shri M.V. Deshpande, learned Counsel for the petitioner states on instructions that the petitioner does not press for the relief at prayer clause (B) to the petition but prays for grant of liberty to file a petition afresh seeking the said relief in the event the representations submitted by the petitioner are decided against the petitioner. In that light of the matter, therefore, this petition stands dismissed in respect of prayer clause (B) to the petition with the liberty as prayed for. 3. In the light of the relief which the petitioner has prayed for at prayer clause (C) to the petition, i.e. directing the respondent to decide the representations of the petitioner, dated 22.6.2007 and 22.9.2009, according to us it is not necessary to advert to the factual aspects of the present petition. Suffice it to say, that this petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (C) to the petition. Respondents to decide the said representations of the 3 petitioner within six weeks from today, if pending, in accordance with law and communicate the decision thereon to the petitioner. 4. Rule is thus made absolute on the above terms with no order as to costs. ( N.D. DESHPANDE ) ( P.V.HARDAS ) JUDGE JUDGE amj/wp5857.10