-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B.Civil Miscellaneous Restoration Application No.811/2009 IN S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.72 of 2002. Union of India V E R S U S Maharaj Prithviraj son of His Highness late Maharaja Shri Man Singh Ji Bahadur of Jaipur and Another Date of Order :::: 08/07/2010 Hon'ble Mr.Justice Dalip Singh Shri S.S. Raghava, Counsel for the applicant-appellant Shri R.P. Agarwal, Counsel for the non-applicants *** PER COURT : Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the restoration application as well as reply filed by the non-applicants. Learned counsel for the non-applicants has raised an objection that the restoration application has been filed without any proper authority, inasmuch as no memo of appeal etc., has been filed on behalf of the applicant-appellant. From the record, I find that the authority on behalf of the Union of India i.e. the Department of Post and Telegraph, Ministry of Communication, New Delhi has been filed by way of the `Vakalatnama' under the authority of the Senior Superintendent of Post Office, Jaipur City Division, Jaipur. In that view of the matter, the objection raised by the learned counsel for the respondents cannot be sustained. -2- So far as the restoration application is concerned for restoring the appeal, which was dismissed under the order dated 05.11.2008 on account of the non-appearance of the counsel for the appellant, on the basis of the facts mentioned in the application, I am satisfied that there was sufficient cause, which prevented the counsel for the appellant to appear at the time of the hearing of the appeal. The non-appearance of the counsel for the appellant was bonafide. In that view of the matter, the restoration application is allowed. The order dated 05.11.2008 is recalled. S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.72 of 2002 is restored to its original number. (Dalip Singh),J. Ashok/