IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 24TH MARCH 2011 / 3RD CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 9390 of 2011(W) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- VELU SUDARDANAN, S/O.VELU, TOA, WORKS & ESTATES DIVISION, NPOL, THRIKKAKARA, ERNAKULAM, RESIDING AT BHARGAVI NILAYAM, THRIKKAKARA P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.LATHA PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION, BLOCK NO.4, 5TH FLOOR, OLD JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, NEW DELHI-110 067. 2. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCES, PARLIAMENT STREET, NEW DELHI-110 001. BY SRI. P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR, ASST.SOLICITIOR GENERAL OF INDIA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J -------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.9390 OF 2011 -------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of March 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner wanted to have certain information for which Ext.P1 application was filed before the concerned authority under the Right to Information Act, which however was not properly dealt with while passing Ext.P2 order. Being aggrieved of the same, the petitioner preferred Ext.P3 appeal, which also did not turn ton be fruitful as borne by Ext.P4order passed by the First Appellate Authority. It is in the said circumstance, that the petitioner has filed Ext.P5 before the 1st respondent as prescribed under the relevant provisions of law, which is still to be finalised, thus driving the petitioner to approach this Court. 2. Heard the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents as well. 3. In the above circumstances, the 1st respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate order on Ext.P5 in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 'one month' from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. 4. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the Writ Petition before the 1st respondent for taking further steps. Writ Petition is disposed of. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE vdv