IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.374 of 2011 ANIL @ DUA S/O LALAN SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 20.04.2011 The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 21.09.2010 vide Cr. Mis. No. 25797 of 2010 on the ground that he had been given oral dying declaration before the informant and the son of the deceased had given a statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. supporting this fact. It has been submitted that now the son of the deceased had been examined during trial and he did not support the statement given by him under Section 164 Cr.P.C. However, since there is a dying declaration given before the informant who has not been examined as yet, I am not inclined to review the earlier order. The application is once again rejected. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)