IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52826 of 2008 BUDHAN CHAUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 17.02.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there was no manufactured wine in the orchard from where apparatus of manufacturing of wine was seized and the petitioner is shown fleeing away from there and for that, he is in custody since 31.10.2008. Taking into consideration of his custody, the prayer for bail is allowed. Let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Jehanabad in connection with Mahendia P.S. Case no. 41 of 2008. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)