IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 7331 of 2008. Decided on: 09.12.2010. _________________________________________________________ Chaman Lal. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : None. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J.(Oral): Petitioner was discharged from the Indian Army in the year 1989. He registered his name with the Employment Ex-Servicemen Cell, Hamirpur vide registration No.1/89 for the post of Graduate vacancies/food Inspector etc. The grievance of the petitioner is that his name has not been considered/sponsored by the respondent for the post commensurating his qualifications. It has come in the reply that the case of the petitioner was considered for the post of Veterinary Pharmacist. He had shown his unwillingness. He was also called for the post of Forest Guard, but he did not respond. The fact of the matter is that the petitioner has already been gainfully employed on regular basis in Life Insurance Corporation of India with effect from 8th October, 1992. The 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - petition was filed in the year 2001 and the petitioner was at that time 48 years old. He has already attained the age of 57 years. He has become overage now for employment under the State Government, State Government Undertakings and Autonomous Bodies. 2. Accordingly, in view of the observations made hereinabove, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any. However, in case the petitioner is still aggrieved, he can make a representation for the redressal of his grievance. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 09, 2010. (sck).