IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.5061 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision : 27.8.2010 Santosh Kumar ....Petitioner Versus Rohtash Mangla and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Sandeep Chhabra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Shiv Kumar, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 4 and 8. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The challenge in this revision petition is to the order dated 10.5.2008 by which the prayer for injunction was declined to the petitioner. The said order is of the year 2008. Two years have elapsed and, therefore, it would be extremely harsh to upset the interim protection granted to the respondents even if the revision petition is dismissed. Having regard to the aforesaid, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the revision petition with a direction to the learned trial court to conclude the trial of the suit as expeditiously as possible. It has been brought to the notice of this Court by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the trial court has not yet entirely concluded his evidence. C.R.No.5061 of 2008 (O&M) -2- Having regard to this situation, the petitioner shall be granted two opportunities to conclude his evidence. Thereafter, the respondents shall be granted three opportunities to conclude their entire evidence. No untoward or unwarranted adjournment shall be granted to either of the parties. The trial court shall also make an endeavour to conclude the trial preferably within a period of one year from today. The revision petition stands disposed of. 27.8.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss