1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 3511/2009 [ Deoman @ Bandu Manik Dhore .vrs. State of Maharashtra] ..................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr. S.D.Chopde, Advocate, for the applicant Mrs. Wandile, APP, for respondent. .......... CORAM : P.D. KODE, J. DATE : DECEMBER 04, 2009. Heard. Both the sides have made submissions in accordance with the stand taken by them respectively in the application and the say for opposing the application. Having regard to the reasons for which ad-interim protection was given vide order dated 23rd November, 2009, and the same holding good in spite of the matter stated in the reply as character of a prosecution evidence having remained the same, the ad-interim order deserves to be confirmed in spite of the application being vehemently opposed by learned APP. Accordingly the same is confirmed on same terms and conditions up till filing of charge sheet in the said crime. 2 However, liberty to the prosecution in accordance with law to apply for cancellation/ modification of the order. Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Rvjalit