£i§3§£§ 3mg§§§ (Lg: LW/ @ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION (S) No. ‘$‘ l‘ [201 1. PETITIONER: / Shrivatsram Gupta, son of Brijmohan Gupta, aged about 59 years, worldng as Head Master Primary School ’l‘inmini, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. versus I / 1f State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary School Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Resgondents Chhattisgarh. /"2. District Education Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. o 3. Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattjsgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER AKI‘ICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA W @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 1811 of2011 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Amit PETITIONER : Shrivatsram Gupta. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shxi C.J.K.Rao, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Govemment Advocate for the State/respondents. ORDER ORAL , (Passed on 04 day ofApril, 201 l) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation in the light of circular dated 05.01.2011 issued by the Government of Chhattisgarh, School Education Department.- 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side has no objection. 3. No permission of this Court is required to make representation to the respondent authorities. Thus, such direction cannot be issued. However, if the petitioners make a representation to the respondent authorities, the same may be considered and decided in accordance with law, on its own merits and perspective. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge i