IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20041 of 2010 PULIS THAKUR Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.20514 of 2010 PUTUS YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.22146 of 2010 RAGHU RAJAK @ RAGHUNANDAN RAJAK, BATTO RAJAK, DEVAL RAJAK & MITHUN KUMAR RAJAK @ MITHUN RAJAK Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 1.7.2010 As all these cases arise out of the same P.S. case number, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The petitioners are accused in a case under sections 147, 148, 149, 448,302 of the Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. It is alleged by the informant that all the accused persons are involved in killing of her husband Nandkeshwar Yadav. Counsel for the petitioners submits that in the F.I.R. there is specific mentioned the name of four persons namely Pappu Yadav, Munna Yadav, Raj Kumar Yadav and Nirbhay Yadav who had fired upon the deceased as a result of which he fell down and succumbed to the injuries. He further submits that the post mortem report would show that the deceased sustained only one injury on his thigh. Counsel for the informant submits that these petitioners are associates of the co-accused persons who fired and killed her husband. She further submits that earlier also the associates of the petitioner had - 2 - KHAN killed other family members of the informant. The informant has raised apprehension that the petitioners after coming out of jail may again try to harm her. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case that specific allegation of killing has been leveled against other accused persons, the petitioners namely Pulis Thakur, Putus Yadav, Raghu Rajak @ Raghunandan Rajak, Batto Rajak, Deval Rajak, Mithun Kumar Rajak @ Mithun Rajak are directed to be released on bail in connection with Gogri P.S. Case No.17 of 2010 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria subject to the following conditions: i) The petitioners would report to the concerned police station once in every two months and would file an affidavit to the aforesaid effect in the learned court below; ii) The petitioners would not absent themselves in the court below for two consecutive dates till three witnesses are examined in trial; and iii) One of their bailers would be a public servant. (S.P.Singh,J)