IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 1526 of 2006 DATED: 28-8-2006 Between: M.Mannemaiah and others petitioners And The Regional Manager, APSRTC Mahabubnagar Region, Mahabubnagar, AP & another Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.1526 of 2006 ORAL ORDER: The present writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in not allotting express chart duty to the petitioners. The petitioners herein are working as conductors in respondent corporation at Wanaparthy Bus Depot of Mahabubnagar region. The petitioners state that they were posted to Mahabubnagar region on their request at loss of their service in the region for the purpose of promotions. The petitioners claim that the express chart should be given to such conductors who have completed more service in the corporation so as to facilitate the aged persons. It is stated that similarly placed persons filed W.P. No. 9520 of 1998 and the same was disposed of directing the respondents therein to consider the case of the petitioners therein on their representation. It is also stated that subsequently the second respondent passed orders dated 17.7.1998 stating that the express chart will be allotted as per seniority. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondent corporation. It is not the case of the petitioners that there is any violation of a circular or Regulation of the corporation or that they were deprived of a right. Even it is not their case that they had apprised the officials of their grievance and no action was taken thereon. Without approaching the concerned authorities for redressal of their grievance with regard to allotment of duty charts, the petitioners straight-away approached this Court. Be that as it may, the allotment of duties to conductors is purely an administrative function and the same cannot be monitored by this Court. If the petitioners have any grievance, they should approach the concerned officials and seek redressal of the same in terms of the rules and regulations of the corporation. There are no merits in the writ petition warranting interference of this Court. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. ____________ N.V.RAMANA,J DATE: 28-8-2006 TVK 77 THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 1526 of 2006 DATED: 28-8-2006