L.P.A. No. 485 of 2010 -1- In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh L.P.A. No. 485 of 2010 Date of Decision: July 04 , 2011 Dr. Krishan Kumar Kapoor ---Appellant versus Dr. T.R.Dhawan and others ---Respondents L.P.A. No. 486 of 2010 Dr. Krishan Kumar Kapoor ---Appellant versus Dr. T.R.Dhawan and others ---Respondents Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH *** Present: Mr. V.B.Aggarwal, Advocate, for the appellant Mr. K.L.Arora, Advocate, for respondent No. 1 Mr. RKS Brar, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana for respondent No. 2 Mr. Mohnish Sharma, Advocate, for Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate, for respondents No. 3 and 4 *** L.P.A. No. 485 of 2010 -2- 1. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M.Kumar, J. 1. Both the instant appeals under Clause X of the Letters Patent are directed against judgment dated 12.1.2010 rendered by learned Single Judge. 2. The appellant was not a party to the proceedings before the learned Single Judge. However, he tried to contend that on account of the fact that the writ petitioner-respondent No. 1 has been given the benefit of service rendered by him to the Health Department of the State Government for the purpose of seniority, he would steal march over the appellant. 3. Mr. Aggarwal, learned counsel for the appellant, at the out set states that the appeals have been rendered infructuous as the appellant has retired on 30.3.2011. Therefore, there would be no effect on his seniority by virtue of the judgment. 4. In view of the above, these appeals are dismissed as having rendered infructuous. 5. A photo copy of this order be placed on the file of the connected case. (M.M.KUMAR) (GURDEV SINGH) JUDGE JUDGE July 04, 2011 PARAMJIT