IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Civil Writ Petition No. 43 of 2005 (S/B) Dr. Anil Kumar & 29 others …… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand &others ……. Respondents Mr. Alok Mehra, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Manoj Tiwari Advocate for petitioners. Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Brief Holder for respondent. JUDGMENT Coram : Hon’ble J.C.S.Rawat,J. Hon’ble P.C. Pant , J. J.C.S RAWAT, J. (Oral) Mr. Alok Mehra, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Manoj Tiwari Advocate for petitioners. Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Brief Holder for respondent. 2. Mr. Alok Mehar, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Manoj Tiwari Advocate for petitioners submits that the writ petition has become infructuous as the petitioners do not want to press the writ petition. 4. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (P.C.Pant, J.) (J.C.S.Rawat, J.) Dated 30.11.2007 LSR