THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.5561 of 2010 10.03.2010 Between: Scheduled Caste Educated Unemployees Field Labour Society Rep.by its President N.Subba Rao ….Petitioners AND The District Collector, East Godavari District, At Kakinada and others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.5561 OF 2010 ORDER: The Scheduled Caste Educated Unemployees’ Field Labour Society, a registered association, filed the instant writ petition seeking a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents 2 and 3 in not implementing the proceedings of first respondent dated 04.11.2009 as illegal and arbitrary and for consequential direction to implement the said proceedings. The petitioner society was given lease of land admeasuring Acs.18.50 cents in survey No.594 situated at Velapulanka village of Rajahmundry Mandal in East Godavari District. Each of the 74 members was allotted Acs.0.25 cents for growing vegetables and fruits on yearly leased amount of Rs.300/- per annum. The lease was renewed for Fasli 1412. When the Village Administrative Officer (VAO) refused to receive the lease amount, the petitioner approached the Chief Commissioner for Land Administration, Hyderabad. The report made by the petitioner was forwarded to District Collector, who by letter dated 04.11.2009 directed respondents 2 and 3 to send necessary proposals in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.970, dated 25.08.1976, in vain. Therefore, the petitioner society filed instant writ petition. After hearing counsel for petitioner, this Court is convinced that the writ petition is misconceived. A perusal of the letter dated 04.11.2009 by the District Collector to the Revenue Divisional Officer and Tahsildar would show that the petitioner submitted a petition dated 02.11.2009 to Grievance Cell. After considering the same, proposals were sought. If that be so, nothing prevents the petitioner again to approach the District Collector. The petitioner approached this Court under Article 226 of Constitution of India. The respondents 2 and 3 being subordinates are bound to obey all legal orders of the District Collector, the petitioner, therefore, may approach the District Collector for redressal. The writ petition, with the above observations, is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 10.03.2010 Pln