* 1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.498 OF 2008 Kisan Keshav Dalvi ..... Applicant/Orig.Complainant vs. Babu Narayan Gholap ..... Respondents ========== Mr.Viresh V.Purwant, Advocate for applicant. Mr.J.P.Kharge, APP for respondents. CORAM : SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATED : 20TH AUGUST, 2009. PC : 1. Heard counsels for both sides. 2. This Revision Application is filed by the original complainant to challenge the correctness and legality of the order dated 24th July 2008 passed by the Sessions Court acquitting the respondents of the offence punishable under Section 498A, 306, 304A read with Section 34 IPC. It was the case of the prosecution that since about six months after the marriage of the deceased with respondent no.1, she was being ill-treated by the respondents for demand of money. The deceased committed suicide about six years after the marriage. During this period, there have not been any complaints to the police as regards * 2 * ill-treatment or harassment. Even the FIR in the instant case, does not specify any instances of ill-treatment. The applicant has baldly stated that the respondents were ill-treating the deceased on the ground that nothing was provided to them as per their demand in the marriage. But it is the evidence of the applicant himself, that nothing was demanded at the time of marriage. The learned Sessions Judge has considered the evidence on record,the contents of the FIR and observed that the FIR is absolutely silent as regards the nature of demands made by the respondents and the nature of the ill-treatment meted out to the deceased to arrive at the conclusion of acquittal of the respondents. 3. I have carefully gone through the impugned judgment. The view taken by the learned Judge is a reasonable and possible view. It does not warrant any interference. Hence, the Criminal Revision Application is dismissed. [SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J.]