1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 100 OF 1991 Hasanmiya Suleman Nawade since deceased through L.Rs. 1. Smt. Ajija w/o Hasanmiya Nawade & ors.......Appellants versus Hafija Latif Bhatkar since deceased through L.Rs. 1, Shamsunnisa A. Kadir Gadkari & ors......... Respondents. Mr. S.M. Raikar for the Appellants Ms. Manisha Pant i/b Bhave & Co. for the Respondent no.2 . CORAM: R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 06th OCTOBER, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Raikar the learned counsel for the appellant. The appellant is the original plaintiff. The suit for mandatory injunction for removal of the wall in question and for possession of the suit property described by letter XYZ, is dismissed by the trial court. Lower appellate court confirmed the decree. Both the courts below concurrently held that the appellant/plaintiff could not prove title of the suit property which is described by letter XYZ in the plaint map. I do not find any error in the finding recorded by the lower courts. No substantial question of law 2 involved in the second appeal. The same is devoid of any merit and hence is dismissed. ( R.V. MORE, J.)