CRM No. M-5934 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-5934 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 05.05.2011 Pardeep Singh and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mrs. Baljit Mann, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. K.D. Sachdeva, Addl. A.G., Punjab. Mr. JBS Gill, Advocate, for the complainant. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.190 dated 15.10.2010 under Sections 323/324/326/307/120- B/506/148/149 IPC, Police Station Tanda, District Hoshiarpur. This Court vide order dated 4.3.2011 has directed to release the petitioners on interim bail. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that despite of direction issued by this Court vide order dated 4.3.2011, petitioner No.2 has failed to join the investigation, therefore, she does not want to press application on behalf of petitioner No.2. Dismissed qua petitioner No.2. Mr. K.D. Sachdeva, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, on instructions from ASI Narinder Singh, who is personally CRM No. M-5934 of 2011 (O&M) -2- present in Court, states that rest of the petitioners have deposited their respective weapons by moving application before the Court, therefore, their custodial interrogation is not required. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and especially the statement of learned Additional Advocate General, petition is allowed. Order dated 4.3.2011 is made absolute qua petitioners No.1, 3 and 4, subject to the following conditions: - i) that they shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; ii) that they shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iii) that they shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. It is made clear that in the event of violation of any of the conditions, prosecution shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of the bail. (Alok Singh) Judge May 05, 2011 R.S.