IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:21.11.2011 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR W.P.Nos.19564,20001,20002,20431,20432, 21158 21281,21395,21400,21513,21521,21899,22045, 22191,22251,22490,22683 to 22686,22698,22756 to 22759,22808,22809,22810,22811,22812 & 22813 23362,24081 to 24087 ,and 25497 of 2011 M.P.Nos.2,2 & 2,2 & 2,2,2 1,2 ,2 & 3, 2 & 3 ,2, 2, 2 ,2, 2 t 2, 1,2 to 2 ,2 & 3 2 & 2 2 to 2 1 & 2 1 to 1 & 2 to 2 ,1 & 2 of 2011 Minor B.Abinash rep. By his father and Natural Guardian M.Baskar ...Petitioner in W.P.NO.19564 of 2011 1 MINOR S.SOMESH REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN M.SUNDAREESAN 2 MINOR V.NIKHIL NANDHA REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN VEERARAGHAVAN 3 MINOR ARAVIND KRISHNA REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN S.VENKATRAMAN 4 MINOR GANAPATHY SUBRAMANIAN REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN S.RAMAKRISHNAN 5 MINOR MAANASA REP. BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN BHASKARAN 6 MINOR R.SANTHOSH REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN VIJAYALKAHSMI 7 MINOR G.V.MILAN REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN VALLUVAN https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 8 MINOR R THANUSH KIRAN REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN LOKESWARA BABU 9 MINOR V.AISHWARYA REP. BY HER MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN SHYAMALA 10 MINOR ABISHEK PRAKASH REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN PRAKASH 11 MINOR K.MAITRAEYAN REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN DEVASENA 12 MINOR S.R.KRITHIGA RAJAN REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN C.RAJAN 13 MINOR DIVYA PRIYA REP. BY HER MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN GOWRI 14 MINOR C.AJHAY SHRINIVASS REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN CHARLES P. 15 MINOR M.P.BALAJI REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN PANEERCHELVAN 16 MINOR K.V.VIJAI PRANAV REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN M.VAIDYANATHAN 17 MINOR C.ANTONY MARSHALL REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN C.TAMIL SELVAN 18 MINOR R.ROSHAN KUMAR REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN T.RAMKKUMAR 19 MINOR J.R.ANAND RAJ REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN RUPAN SELVAKUMAR https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 20 MINOR TARUN PARANDHAMAN REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN PARANDHAMAN ...PETITIONERS IN W.P.20001/2011 1 MINOR G.PRIYANGA REP. BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN GUNASEKARAN 2 MINOR A.SUBARANJINI REP. BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN ASHOCK RAJ 3 MINOR M.DEVI REP. BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN MUTHUKUMARAVEL 4 MINOR V.VASUMATHI REP. BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN VALAYAPATHY PANDIYAN 5 MINOR MOHANA REP. BY HER MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN KANIMOZHI 6 MINOR M.RAGUL REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN S.R. MAHENDIRAN 7 MINOR A SABARI GIRISHAN REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN V.R.ANANTHAN 8 MINOR A.ARTHI PRIYANKA REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN V.R.ANANTHAN ... PETITIONERS IN W.P.20002/2011 MINOR V. ARCHANA REP BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN C. VEERAPPAN ... PETITIONER IN W.P.20431/2011 MINOR C. SRI DEVI REP BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN N.CHINNADURAI ... PETITIONER IN W.P.20432/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1 MINOR V. SWETHA REP BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN B.VASUDEVEN 2 MINOR E. AMREEN FAZAL REP BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN FAZULEEN 3 MINOR T.S. SATHYANARAYANAN REP BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN E.SUDAKAR 4 MINOR P. TEPHILLAH REP BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN M.PRABHAKAR 5 MINOR B. INDHULEKA REP BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN K.BALAMURUGAN 6 MINOR AKILTOM REP BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN A.C. TOMY ... PETITIONER IN W.P.21158/2011 1 MINOR S.DHARSHINI REP. BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN P.SURESH BABU 2 MINOR S.UMADEVI REP. BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN M. SURESH PANDIAN 3 MINOR V.B.BARATH BAASU REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN V. BABU 4 MINOR K.MUGUNTHAN REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN S.KRISHNAKUMAR 5 MINOR K.MOHITHKUMAR REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN S. KRISHNAKUMAR 6 MINOR S.DANUSH REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN C. SURESH https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 7 MINOR S.SASIKEERTHANA REP. BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN G. SIVAKUMAR 8 MINOR V.ADHITHYA REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN VENKATESH 9 MINOR SANSKRITI SRINIVASAN REP. BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN SRINIVASAN 10 MINOR R.SUSHMITHA REP. BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN M.RAGHURAMAN ... PETITIONER IN W.P.21281/2011 CHANDHRA THE VICE PRINCIPAL SISHYA SCHOOL ... PETITIONER IN W.P.21395/2011 T. SETHU MANICKAVEL REP BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN S.THIRUMARAN ... PETITIONER IN W.P.21400/2011 1. MINOR S.VILASINI REP.BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN S.SUNDAR 2 MINOR A. KAAVYA SRI REP.BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN A.ANBUMANI ... PETITIONER IN W.P.21513/2011 1 MINOR L.KARAN BAFNA REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN LALIT BAFNA 2 P.KUMARESH PANDIAN REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN P.PICHAI MUTHU 3. P.MUKUNDAN REPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN PURUSHOTAHMAN 4 M.ANANTHAN https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5 M.ARAVINTHAN PETETIONERS 4 & 5 REP. BY THEIR FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN MR. R.MAHENDRAN 6 MINOR KARTHIK VEDACHALAM 7 MINOR VIMALESH VEDACHALAM PETITIONERS 6 AND 7 REP. BY THEIR FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN MR. M.VEDACHALAM 8 MINOR C.G.HARISH REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN MR.C.V.GANESH 9 MINOR R.PRABHU REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN MR.D.RAMALINGAM 10 MINOR K.KIRUBHAKARAN REP. BY HIS MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN M.KARUPPAIAH 11 MINOR PRAMAAN MARUTHI REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN MR.J. MARUTHI 12 MINOR B.SMRUTHI REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN MR.S.BALA SANKAR 13 MINOR E.L.NARESH NARENDERNATH REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN MR.K.E.LAKSHMIPATHY ...PETITIONERS IN W.P.21521/2011 MINOR S.ASWATHAAMAN REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN MR.C.SRIDHAR ...PETITIONERS IN W.P.21899/2011 MINOR S. MUGDHA MALLAREDDY REP BY HER MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN MANJULA SRINIVAS ...PETITIONER IN W.P.22045/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1. MADHAV KINI (MINOR) REP. BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN AND FATHER P. VAUDEV KINI 2 VARUN KINI (MINOR) REP. BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN AND FATHER P.VAUDEV KINI 3 T.M.DHIVYESH RAJ (MINOR) REP. BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN AND FATHER P. MOHANRAJ 4 V.SIVARAMAN REP. BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN AND FATHER R. VAIDYANATHAN 5 KAUSHIKA KUMAR REP. BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN AND FATHER R. KUMAR 6 SHAKTHI KUMAR REP. BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN AND FATHER R.KUMAR ...PETITIONERS IN W.P.22191/2011 1. MINOR SHRUTHI MAHALINGAM REP BY HER MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN MRS.AKILANDESWARI.M. 2 MINOR S. VINITHKUMAR REP BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN MR.M. SUNDARAM 3 MINOR A.V.JAYAVEENA REP BY HER MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN MRS. RAJESHWARI KUMARI 4 MINOR V. NIRANJAN REP BY HIS MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN MRS.V. SUNDARY 5 MINOR R. SNEHA REP BY HER MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN MRS.R.REVATHI 6 MINOR V.K.R. MEENAKSHI REP BY HER MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN MRS. K.RADHA https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 7 MINOR JAYWANT VIJAYA KUMAR REP BY HIS MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN MRS. RAJESHWARI KUMARI 8 MINOR M. AARTHI REP BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN MR.M. MURALI 9 MINOR SV. ARUNTHANEERMALAI REP BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN S/O. SV. CHINNASEVUGAN CHETTY ...PETITIONER IN W.P.22251 /2011 MINOR VATCHALA ASHOKAN REP. BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN MR.S.M.ASHOKAN ..PETITIONER IN W.P.22490/2011 Minor M.Harishraj rep. by Father and Natural Guardian R.Mohan ..Petitioner in WP No.22683/2011 Minor Bruhu Adithya Balaji rep. by Father and Natural Guardian S.V.Balaji ..Petitioner in WP No.22684/2011 Minor P.Chandru rep. by Father and Natural Guardian C.Prem Ananth ..Petitioner in WP No.22685/2011 Minor Samyuktha Chandar rep. by Father and Natural Guardian Vidya Chandar ..Petitioner in WP No.22686/2011 A.Nixon Veda Asir Anthony rep. by his Father and Natural Guardian V.Anthony A.S.Raj ..Petitioner in WP No.22698/2011 Minor A.Tejeshwar rep. by his Mother and Natural Guardian Amutha ..Petitioner in WP No.22756/2011 Minor K.Aarathy rep. by her Father and Natural Guardian Kasthuri Raj ..Petitioner in WP No.22757/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Minor K.Hariharan rep. by his Father and Natural Guardian Kandhasamy ..Petitioner in WP No.22758/2011 Minor R.Naveen rep. by his Father and Natural Guardian Ramalingam ..Petitioner in WP No.22759/2011 Minor K.Aravind rep. by his Father and Natural Guardian D.Kummanan ..Petitioner in WP No.22808/2011 Minor S.Aashish rep. by his Mother and Natural Guardian Mythily ..Petitioner in WP No.22809/2011 Minor R.Lavanya rep. by his Mother and Natural Guardian Hemalatha ..Petitioner in WP No.22810/2011 Minor Rasika Gopalakrishnan rep. by Mother and Natural Guardian S.Meenakshi ..Petitioner in WP No.22811/2011 Minor Kavya Gopalakrishnan rep. by Mother and Natural Guardian S.Meenakshi ..Petitioner in WP No.22812/2011 Minor Sitara Niranjan rep. by Mother and Natural Guardian Sumitra Niranjan ..Petitioner in WP No.22813/2011 1 MINOR V.GOPI KRISHNA REP.BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN V.MAHENDRA KUMAR 2 MINOR A.AAKASH REP.BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN A. ARUL MOZHI NAMBI 3 MINOR P.A.SAMYUKTHA REP.BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN P.ARUMUGAM 4 MINOR R.ARAVIND REP.BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN K.RAMESH BABU https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5 MINOR MALAVIKA MURALIDHARAN REP.BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN V.G.MURALIDHARAN 6 MINOR V.YOGASHREE REP.BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN C.VENKATESAN ..Petitoners in WP 23362/2011 Minor Sushruthi Hema Chandran rep. by her Mother and Natural Guardian N.Ramaa Ramakrishnan ..Petitioner in WP No.24081/2011 Minor Sushruthii Hema Chandran rep. by her Mother and Natural Guardian N.Ramaa Ramakrishnan ..Petitioner in WP No.24081/2011 Minor Siksha Jain rep. by her Mother and Natural Guardian Sanjay Jain ..Petitioner in WP No.24082/2011 Minor Suryansh Sanklecha rep. by his Mother and Natural Guardian Ompraksh Sanklecha ..Petitioner in WP No.24083/2011 Minor Shrut Bhayani rep. by his Mother and Natural Guardian Parul Bhayani ..Petitioner in WP No.24084/2011 Minor Yash Gupta rep. by his Mother and Natural Guardian Akash Kumar Gupta ..Petitioner in WP No.24085/2011 Minor Keshav Fomra rep. by his Mother and Natural Guardian Sushil Formra ..Petitioner in WP No.24086/2011 Minor Shreyans Bhayani rep. by his Mother and Natural Guardian Parul Bhayani ..Petitioner in WP No.24087/2011 1.K. Sriram (Minor) aged about 12 years rep. by its natural Guardian and Father S. Krishnan, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. Adithya Srinivasa Raghavan (Minor) aged about 14 years Rep. by his natural Guardian and mother Vidya Srinivasa Raghavan. 3. S. Oviya (Minor) aged about 12 years Rep. by her Natural Guardian and Father P. Sateesh Kumar. 4. Monisha Preethi (minor) aged about 13 years rep.by her Natural Guardian and Father P. Chandran. 5. R.S. Sushmetha (Minor) aged about 11 years Rep. by her Natural Guardian and Father P.R. Shivakumaar, .. Petitioners in W.P.25497/2011 Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government, Department of School Education, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009. ..1st Respondent in W.P.19564/11 20001, 20002, 20431, 20432, 21158, 21281, 21395, 21513, 21521, 21899,22045, 22191, 22490, 22251, 22683, to 22686, 22756, 22757, 22758, 22759, 22808, 22809, 22810, 22811, 22812, 22813, 23362, 24081, 24082,24083, 24084,24085 24086, 24087, 25497/2011 2. The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai 600 006. ..2nd Respondent i W.P.19564/2011, 20001, 20002, 20431, 20432, 21158, 21281, 21395, 21513 21521, 21899, 22045, 22490 22251, 22191, 22683 to 22686 22756, 22757, 22758, 22759, 22808,22809, 22810, 22811 22812, 22813, 23362,24081 24082, 24083, 24084, 24085,24086,24087, 25497/2011. R3 in W.P.21400, 22698/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. M/s. Central Board of Secretary Education (CBSC) Rep.by its Chairman, Secretary and Chief Vigilance Officer, CBSC, Head Quarters, No.2, Community Centre, Prect Vihar, Delhi 110 092. ..2nd Respondent in WP.21400/2011 22698/2011 3. The School Games Federation of India, Rep by its President,Shastri Bhavan, New Delhi 110 009. ...3rd Respondent in WP.Nos.19564, 20001, 20002, 20431, 20432, 21158, 21281, 21395 21513, 21521, 21899, 22045, 22490, 22251 22191, 22683 to 22686, 22756, 22757, 22758 22759, 22808, 22809, 22810, 22811, 22812 22813, 23362, 24081, 24082, 24083, 24084 24085, 24086, 24087, 25497/2011 R4 in WP.21400, 22698/2011 4. Tamil Nadu Engineering Admission, Rep by its Secretary, Anna University, Guindy, Chennai 32. ...4th respondent in WP.Nos.19564, 20001, 20002, 20431, 20432, 21158, 21395, 22756, 22757, 22758, 22759, 22809, 22810, 23362, 24081, 24082, 24083, 24084, 24085, 24086, 24087/2011 5. Central Board of Secondary Education (C.B.S.E) Rep by Assistant Secretary, Regional Office, Chennai, No.3, Old No.1630-A, J Block, Anna Nagar (W), 16th Main Road, Chennai 40. (R5 Impleaded as per order dated 21.11.2011 in MP.No.3/2011 in WP.19564/2011) ...5th Respondent in WP.Nos. 19564 20001, 20002, 20431, 20432, 21158 21395, 22756, 22757, 22758, 22759 22809, 22810, 23362, 24081, 24082 24083, 24084, 24085, 24086 24087/2011 R4 in WP.21281/2011, 21513, 22045 22683 to 22686/2011, 22811, 22812 22813/2011 R1 in WP.21400/2011, 22698/2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 6. Minor R. Akshay Kumar Rep by his father and Natural guardian C. Ravi, Chennai 7. Minor P. Perarivalan rep by his father and natural guardian G. Prabakaran Chennai ...Respondents 6 & 7 in W.P. 23362/2011 (R6 and R7 impleaded as per order dated 21.11.2011 in M.Ps.Nos.3 & 4/2011 in W.P.No.23362/2011 Writ petition filed under Article 226 of th Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of Certiorarifie Mandamus calling for the records relating to the order of the 1 respondent passed in G.O.NO.224, School Education(V2)Departmen dated 06.08.2010 and to quash the same, so far as the petitione is concerned and consequently forbearing the respondents 1 and from preventing the petitioner in participating in all the schoo level sports events selection for the Tamil Nadu State Tea including the School Games Federation of India and other sport meets being conducted by the respondents for the school student in the State of Tamil Nadu. (W.P.NO.19564, 20001, 20002, 20431 20432, 21158, 21395, 22045, 22251, 22756 to 22759, 22809, 22810 23362, 24081 to 24087/2011. WP.21281, 21513, 22683 to 22686, 22811, 22812, 22813/2011: WP filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India Praying t issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus, Calling for the record relating to the order of the 1st respondent passed in G.O.No.22 School Education (V2) Department dt 6.8.2010 and to quash th same, so far as the petitioners are concerned and consequentl forbearing the respondents 1 to 3 from preventing the petitioner in participating in all the school level sports events selectio for the Tamilnadu State Team including the School Game Federation of India (SGFI) and other sports meets being conducte by the respondents for the school students in the State o Tamilnadu. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ W.P.NO.21400/2011, 22698/2011 Praying to issue a 'Writ o Mandamus' directing the 1st and 2nd respondent to allow an permit the petitioner who is studying in School affiliating t the 3rd respondent to participate in sports events swimmin events and other teams events conducting by the 1st and 2n respondents. W.P.NOs.21521/2011, 21899, 22490/2011 to issue a Writ o Certiorarified Mandamus Calling for the records relating to th impugned order of the 1st respondent in G.O. No. 224 Schoo Education (V2) Department dated 6.8.2010 and quash the same s far as the petitioners are concerned and direct the respondents and 2 to permit the petitioners to participate in all the schoo level sports meets and competition held by the respondents 1 to in the State of Tamilnadu including the SGFI competitions an consider them the State Board Student on the basis o Certificates issued in such common sports meets/competition up t the National Level for selection to professional and educationa courses under sports quota. W.P.NO.22808/2011:Praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarifie Mandamus Calling for the records relating to the impugned orde of the 1st respondent in G.O. Ms. No. 224 School Education (V2 Department dated 6.8.2010 and quash the same in so far as th petitioner is concerned and direct the respondents 1 and 2 t permit the petitioner to participate in all the school leve sports meets and competition to be conducted by the respondents to 2 in the State of Tamilnadu State including the SGF competitions and consider them the State Board student on th basis of certificates issued in such common sport meets/competition up to the National Level for selection t professional and educational courses under sports quota W.P.NO.22191/2011, 25497/2011:Praying to issue a 'Writ o Certiorari' Calling for the records of the 1st responden culminating in its Order GO (Ref) No.224 School Education (V2 Department dated 6.8.2010 and quash the same For Petitioners in W.P.Nos.19564,21281,21513,22683 to 22686,22811 to 22813 of 2011:Mr.Palani Selvaraj https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ For Petitioners in W.P.Nos.20001, 20002, 20431, 20432, 22045, 22756 to 22759, 22809, 22810 ,24081 to 24087 ,23362 of 2011 :Mr.M.Baskar For Petitioner in W.P.No.21395/ of 20011 : Mr.V.R..Shanmuganathan For Petitioner in W.P.Nos.21400,22698/2011: Mr.A.Panneerchelvam For Petitioner in W.P.Nos.21899, 21521/2011: Mr.R.Kannan For Petitioner in W.P.No.22191/ 2011:Mr.N.L.Rajah For Petitioner in W.P.No.22251/ 2011;;Mr.S.Ganesh For Petitioner in W.P.No.22490/ 2011: Mr.P.Thirupathi Raj For Petitioner in W.P.No.22808/2011: Mr.P.Venkataraman For Respondents 1 to 3: Mr.P.Sanjay Gandhi Additional Government Pleader For Respondent No.4: Mr.Mani Sundaragopal for Mr.G.M.Mani Associates For Respondent No.5: Mr.G.Nagarajan O R D E R These writ petitions are filed praying to quash th Government order issued in G.O.Ms.No.224, School Education(V2 Department dated 06.08.2010 insofar as the petitioners ar concerned and consequently forbearing the respondents 1 to 3 fro preventing the petitioners in participating in all the schoo level sports events selection for the Tamil Nadu State Tea including the School Games Federation of India (SGFI) and othe sports meets being conducted by the respondents for the schoo students in the State of Tamil Nadu. 2. All the petitioners are Central Board of Secondar Education School (In short CBSE) students undergoing thei studies in the schools located within the State of Tamil Nadu. 3. On earlier occasion, C.B.S.E, school students file batch of cases in W.P.No.15954 of 2008,12597 of 2009 etc an prayed for the issuance of writ of Mandamus directing th Government of Tamil Nadu to allow the students of CBSE schools t participate in the sports events and athletic meets. This Cour disposed of the said writ petitions on 05.11.2009 with direction The operative portion of the order reads as follows: "24. Even in the present case, it is essential for the Tamil Nadu State Government to make such an attempt to have broad based consultation with all the stake holder. If https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ necessary, they must form a committee to consider the controversies raised in these writ petitions and arrive at a proper solution, which will be crystallized in the form of a policy of the State Government in consonance with the constitutional mandate, considering the future interest of school going children in Tamil Nadu. Till such time such policy is spelt out and adopted, no CBSE students shall be prevented in participating in various sports events conducted under the Tamil Nadu School Education Department. 26.This Court, in the light of the above, is not suggesting the composition of committee for making such consultation. It is entirely for the State Government to frame guidelines by forming an appropriate committee. Suffice to state that the committee should also take into account the representations of various stakeholders on this issue." 4. The Government issued G.O(1D) No.121 School Educatio Department dated 09.04.2010. Another batch of cases were agai filed in W.P.Nos.15343, 15649 of 2010 etc., challenging the sai Government order constituting the committee. The said wri petitions were disposed of by this Court (K.Chandru,J) o 07.02.2011 and in Paragraphs 4 to 8, it is held as follows: "4. Pursuant to the direction issued by this Court, the Director of School Education in his letter dated 25.2.2010 opined a Committee of Expert can be constituted and after obtaining their opinion, an appropriate policy decision can be taken and the committee must comprise of the Director of School Education and representative of all other Departments including the eminent sports person in the National and International sports and after taking a decision by the Committee, the State Government can taken appropriate policy decision for the academic year 2010-2011. The state Government accepted the recommendations made by the Director of School Education and had appointed a Committee. The Committee as directed by the state Government was to have the Director of School Education as its Chairman and the Joint Director of School Education (NSS) as its Secretary. The Committee comprised one representative each from the Tamil Nadu Sports Development Authority and the Tamil Naud Physical https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Education and Sports University as well as two representatives of Chief Physical Education Inspectors (both genders), two Regional Physical Education Inspectors, four Headmasters/Principals of Matriculation Schools, four Physical Education Director/Teachers and four eminent sports persons who have participated in the National and International sports events. 5. It is on the basis of a sports policy recommended by that Committee, the State Government had agreed to implement the same. Even before the Committee could decide, the petitioners have rushed to this Court probably only with a view to get interim orders so as to enable them to participate in the ensuing competition. Though those respondents have been served with notices, they have not filed any counter affidavit. 6. However, this Court do not find any merit in these writ petitions. They have been filed only with a view to get interim orders, since the impugned order does not in any way affect the rights of the petitioners. On the contrary, in order to give effect to the orders passed by this Court on 5.11.2009, that order came to be passed. This Court is not inclined to entertain the Writ Petitions. Accordingly, all the Writ Petitions stand dismissed. 7. But, however, it must be noted that the State Government had appointed a Committee for recommending to the Government to evolve a policy for the year 2010-2011 and that year almost will come to an end in another two months. It is regrettable that there was no report from the said Committee. Therefore, in the interest of justice and for the future interest of the students studying in the CBSE Schools, this Court hereby directs the Committee, appointed pursuant to G.O.Ms.No.121 School Education Department dated 9.4.2010, to meet as expeditiously as possible and evolve its recommendation on or before 31.3.2011. The State Government is in turn directed to take appropriate decision on the basis of the said recommendation in accordance with law on or before https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 31.5.2011 so that the State Government's policy will be made available to the students who are undergoing School in the CBSE pattern. 8. Since the Writ Petitions are dismissed with the above directions and since the petitioners have obtained the interim relief and have also participated in those events, dismissal of the Writ Petitions will not deny them the benefit that might have accrued to them in participating in the events for which they have got interim orders. However, if any results were withheld due to the pendency of the Writ Petitions, a direction will issue to the respondents to publish those results. No costs. The connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed." 5. While disposing of the said writ petitions, th impugned Government order issued in G.O.MS.No.224 Schoo Education dated 06.08.2010 was very much in force. However learned counsel appearing for the Government or the counse appearing for the petitioner pointed out the said Governmen order before the learned Judge. While upholding G.O.MS.(1D)12 dated 09.04.2010 referred to, a direction was issued by thi Court to publish the results of the sports events participated b C.B.S.E. School students. 6. When these writ petitions were posted for admission taking note of the fact that no further decision was taken by th State Government in terms of the order of this Court date 07.02.2011, an interim order was granted in favour of th C.B.S.E. School students to attend the sports events and libert was given to the Government to take a decision in the light o the direction issued by this Court by order dated 07.02.2011. 7. Learned Special Government Pleader, on instructions from the Department submitted that the expert committee ha submitted a report after disposal of the writ petitions o 07.02.2011 and no decision could be taken as directed by thi Court, in view of the Assembly election held and a new Governmen assumed office in May 2011 and the learned Special Governmen Pleader also submitted that the second respondent has submitted proposal to the Government through proceedings i Na.Ka.No.7990/M/S4-2011 dated 29.08.2011 along with th recommendations made by the Committee and the issue is pendin before the Government for taking a final decision. Learne Special Government Pleader would also submit that in view of th pendency of these writ petitions, the Government has not decide the matter so far. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 8. Since the impugned order which is the subject matte of challenge in these writ petitions, was issued prior to th order of this Court dated 07.02.2011 and the Government havin acted upon on the basis of the directions issued by this Cour dated 07.02.2011, I am of the view that these writ petitions nee not be kept pending. It is for the Government to decide the issu based on the report of the committee as well as the proposa submitted by the second respondent, as stated supra. 9. Hence, these petitions