«y C5 (3/37/5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Petitioner KATTAM RAJA, S/o Late Shri Kattam Chencha, aged about 33 years, Shikasha Karmi class 3rd Naveen Primary School Gangulava Tekalgudiyam block Konta District South Bastar Dantewara [C.G.) Respondents The State of Chhattisgarh, Through: — The Secretary, Chhattisgarh S. C. 8r, S.T. Development Department, Mantralaya D.K.S.Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) The Collector, South Bastar, Dantewara Dist. South Bastar, Dantewara (C.G.) The District Education Officer, South Bastar Dantewara, Dist. South Bastar Dantewara, (C.G.) The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development Dantewara , Dist. South Bastar, Dantewara (C.G.) The Block Education Officer Konta, South Bastar, Dantewara Dist. South Bastar, Dantewara (C.G.) 53371 Sittgla ‘Saaéty‘ W.P‘ S NO. 2009 Th6 Chief Executive Officer Konta, Janpad Panchayat Konta, Dist. South Bagyetr, Dantewara (C.G.} WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE §§6 OF THE OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRITE IN NATURE OF AMU§L CERTIORARI ,PROHABITAION. etc. AND / OR FOR ORDER AND / OR DIECTION / DIRECTIONS IN NATURE OF WRIT. CONSTITUTION __/ MW }‘ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION gs: No. 5582 of2009 PETITIONRR : Kattam Raja. VERSUS RESPONDENTS The State ” .WRET PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTH U I ION OF INDIA SB: Hon’hle Shri Satish K. Agg'lgotri, J. Present: Shri Vijay Kxishna Rae Deshmukh, Advocate for the paitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Government Advocate for the State/respondents. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 25W of day of September, 2009) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits on at this stage and as such: the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition. He thither prays that the respondent authorities may be directed to consider and decide his representation dated 04m lune, 2009 (Annexure P/5) pending before the respondent No. 2, as early as possible. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that in the event, the representation, as stated above is pending consideration, the same shali be considered and decided in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of four weeks form the date of of receipt a copy of this order. 3. In View of the above, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication at this stage. 4, , Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as w'thdrawn as with the aforesaid 0 V observations. . ‘ Sd/R ~ Amit Satlsh K. Agnihctri ~ ‘ Judge