IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22254 of 2010 KALLAN RAI @ KALLU Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------- 03. 05.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is solitary named accused in connection with Wazirganj (Tankuppa OP) P.S. Case No. 201/2009 for offence under sections 376/380 of the Indian Penal Code, but only on disclosure of his name and address as appears from the fardbeyan of the victim who has been as alleged sexually assaulted by the petitioner. No doubt, father of the petitioner whose name somehow or the other emerged during investigation has been granted privilege by order dated 26.04.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 11037/2010, but, entirely on different footing mainly that entire allegation and materials appeared against solitary named accused the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court does not find it a fit case wherein the privilege sought may be granted. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. Rajeev/ (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)