RSA No.3101 of 1987 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.3101 of 1987 (O&M) Date of decision: 1.4.2010 Charan Singh ............Appellant Versus Lachhman Singh and others .......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH -.- Present: Mr. G.S. Jaswal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Karam Bhardwaj, Advocate for Mr. Anupam Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Sarwan Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. M. S. Rapri, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. Heard. RSA No.3101 of 1987 (O&M) -2- 2. In the present second appeal, impugned judgment is dated 22.5.1987 passed by the learned first Appellate Court/Addl. District Judge, Hoshiarpur. 3. Perusal of the impugned judgment dated 22.5.1987 passed by the first Appellate Court reveals that it was passed after recording consent between the parties and their Counsel. It is a settled position of law that no appeal lies against the decree obtained with the consent of the parties. Question of alleged ambiguity, fraud and misrepresentation in recording the settlement/consent cannot be seen in the second appeal. For that purpose appellant had remedy to move the Court concern for recalling/modification of consent order. No substantial question of law is suggested by the learned Counsel for the appellant nor does any substantial question of law arise in the present appeal. 4. The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. ( ALOK SINGH ) 01st April, 2010 JUDGE ashish