1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 1137 of 2008 Dr. Irshard Ahemad Rahimkhan ..vs.. State of Maharashtra. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CORAM : S. R. DONGAONKAR, J. DATE : 21st April, 2008 Heard Shri Madkholkar, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri D. B. Patel, learned APP for respondent- State. Only question is whether the order dated 26th March, 2008 should be confirmed or not. As already observed in the order dated 26th March, 2008, it is the contention of the applicant that the enquiry in the present matter was directed for Washim Taluka, whereas he is working in Malegaon Taluka and as such, he had no concern with the affairs which had happened in Washim Taluka. It is not denied by filing reply. As such, there is no difficulty in confirming the said interim order. In the event of arrest of the applicant for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 408, 409, 468 & 471 of the Indian Penal Code, in Crime No. 365/2007 of P. S. Washim, he be released on bail on furnishing surety and P R 2 Bond of Rs. 25,000/-, subject to conditions that he shall report to the P.S. Washim as and when directed by I. O. for the purposes of investigation in writing and shall not directly or indirectly tamper with the prosecution evidence. It is made clear that the prosecution shall at liberty to move the Court for cancellation of anticipatory bail, if the applicant's above contention is found to be incorrect. The application stands disposed of. JUDGE andurkar.