C.W.P. No.21386 of 2008 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.21386 of 2008 Date of Decision:22.12.2008 Om Parkash ............... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ............Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present: None for the petitioner. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR J. **** This petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorari for quashing of orders of his dismissal from service and further for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent No.1 to decide the mercy representation dated 01.11.2005. The petitioner has challenged the orders of dismissal passed on 31.03.2004 (Annexure P-4). The finding recorded by the Enquiry Officer is that misconduct conducted by him is gravest in nature because he is a habitual absentee, indisciplined and careless. The petitioner challenged the order in appeal, which has also been dismissed on 02.09.2004 (Annexure P-5). His revision also met with the same fate. It has been taken note by the authorities that service record in respect to the petitioner shows that he is an incorrigible bad officer who would be an example of indiscipline if taken back in service. Punishment already awarded to the petitioner has been C.W.P. No.21386 of 2008 -2- found to be reasonable and justified in respect to misconduct on his part. We do not find any reason to differ with the orders passed by the authorities. Even otherwise, the order passed in 2005 has been challenged in December, 2008 which itself shows that the petitioner has accepted the order of his dismissal. The memorial which has been later on given to the Government is of no consequence as it is not a regular statutory remedy for interference after the filing of an appeal and a revision. The writ petition is wholly without merits. Dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (K. KANNAN) JUDGE December 22, 2008 Pankaj*