FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.496 OF 2007 IN SECOND APPEAL ST.NO.6995 OF 2007 -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Mr.P.M.Arjunwadkar for the applicant. Mr.Pradeep Patil for respondent no.1. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED: 28TH AUGUST, 2007 DATED: 28TH AUGUST, 2007 DATED: 28TH AUGUST, 2007 P.C.: . Heard Mr.Arjunwadkar, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr.Patil, learned counsel for respondent 1A to 1D. It appears that respondent no.1E has yet not been served. 2. The cause shown in the application for condoning the delay of 125 days caused in filing the second appeal is sufficient cause. Hence this application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). However, it would be open for respondent no.1E to seek recall of the order if she is aggrieved by this order within a period of four weeks from the date of service in the appeal in the event the notice in the appeal is issued to respondent no.1E. The appeal to come up for admission on 10th September, 2007. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)