HIGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARW.BU.ASPU!R .^"^' -^T^. %• PETITIONERS RESPCiNDENTS W.P. (St N0.737B of 200Z 1 Bhuwan Lal Bareth, S/o Shri Amru Ram Bareth, aged afaoyt 4& years, AssistantTeacher.Govt.Gtri'sPrimaly School ShiVni-^3hampa)i Bloek BalQda,District4anjgir-ehampa(C.G.) 2. Siya Ram Mannewar, Sto Shri Kripa Ram Mannewar, aged about 55 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Baheradih (Champa) Btock - Baloda.DistrictJanjgir-Champap.G.) Versus 1 State 6f Chhattisgarh, Through—The Secretary, Department 6f Education, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2 DirectorPublic Instruction ChhatUsgarhGoyt. Raipur 3 District Education Offfcer, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 4. BloekEdueationOfReer, Block-Baloda, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF :;'.''''::;^':INDffi::.'. :• - • :7'':~'^ AeBearance: ShriA.S.RiajRut,Counself6TUiepetitioners. Shri A.S. Kachhwaha, Govt. Advbcate for the State on advance copy- '.;;- !: • . - 1 ~ ' 1 1 1 ORALORDER (13.12.2007) SUNILKUMARSINHA. J Heard. Learned counset for the peUtioners submite that the issue involved inthecaseiSastowhetherthepetitionersareenUtledtOregularpayscale w.e.f. the date of initialappointment or from the date of completion of probation period. He submits that the issue involved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administoative Tribunal, Jabalpur inO.A. No.2745/89 (Madhukanl Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. and othere),wherein, itwas held thatthe similarlysituatedteachere are entitled to regutar pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. The WP(S) No.7376/2007 ^-^,-. Shyna matter was taken up to the 1-lon'ble Suprerae Court in Special Leave Petition (Cmt) No.6892/93. The said petition was dismissedby the Hon'bte Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to theeffect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from the date of initiat appointment. Leamed counsel for the petitiohers further submits that this Gourt, white considering the same issue in Ram Kumar Sahu andothers Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and another (W.P.(S) No.813 of 2007) by order dated 12.2.2007, has granted regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. Leamed counsel for the parties jointly submils that this case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Ram Kumar Sahu andanother (supra). In view ofthat.thispetitionis allowed in the same terms. However, this order shalt be subject to all verifications made by the Stateregardingfactspleadedinthepetition. ] Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge E^