IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 27605 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 15.11.2011 Kundan Singh .. Petitioner Vs. Balkar Singh and another .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Rakesh Nagpal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G. S. Chahal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. ... Rajesh Bindal J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in terms of the order passed by this court on 14.9.2011, the petitioner has already put in appearance before the court below and submitted his bail bonds. Though as per office report, service of respondent No. 1 is not complete, however, order of the learned court below dated 21.9.2011 shows that when the petitioner had furnished his bail bonds in terms of the order passed by this court on 14.9.2011, counsel for the complainant was present, meaning thereby the complainant has knowledge of the order passed by this court, but still he did not choose to put in appearance. Considering the aforesaid facts, the interim bail granted to the petitioner on 14.9.2011 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 15.11.2011 mk