CRM-M 16641of 2009 1 In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. CRM-M 16641of 2009 Decided on Aug 27,2009. Amarjit Singh -- Petitioner vs. State of Punjab --Respondent. CORAM:HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.JBS Gill,Advocate, for the petitioner Mr.Ranbir Singh Rawat,A.A.G.Punjab, for the respondent/State. Mr.APS Shergill,Advocate,for the complainant. Rakesh Kumar Jain, J: The petitioner has applied for anticipatory bail in case registered vide FIR No.156 dated 03.6.2009 under Sections 341,324,326,506,34 IPC at Police Station, Sadar, Hoshiarpur. The aforesaid FIR was registered on the statement of Yogesh in which it is alleged that on 2.6.2009, he was going with his father's sister's son namely Kamaljit Singh on his scooter to Baba Shah Kuh Peer, situated on Chandigarh- Road Hoshiarpur, where he had to talk to Santokh Singh for purchasing plot to whom advance was also given. At about 6.30 p.m., when they reached at the plot of Santokh Singh, his two sons Amarjit CRM-M 16641of 2009 2 Singh and Gurdial Singh were also present who threatened him that they would neither return the advance nor would execute any agreement of the plot. Due to this, an altercation ensued. While they were returning, the aforesaid persons chased them in a white car and after overtaking stopped them. Santokh Singh raised a lalkara to teach him a lesson for making threat of going to police. Then Amarjit Singh took out a kirpan from the car and gave blow to him which fell on his left arm. Gurdial Singh gave a kirpan blow which fell on his right waist. The assailants ran away when a hue and cry was raised by the complainant. Before coming to this Court, the petitioner had applied for anticipatory bail before the Court below which was dismissed by learned Addl.Sessions Judge, Hoshiarpur, on 11.6.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. It is alleged that Gurdial Singh, brother of the petitioner, was injured by Jaswant Singh and Gunraj Singh, who were summoned on the complaint of Gurdial Singh filed under Section 324/34 IPC. Jaswant Singh is the father-in-law of D.I.G.Jalandhar Range, Jalandhar, who in order to put pressure upon Gurdial Singh to withdraw that complaint has concocted the present version by taking service of injured Yogesh. On the contrary, learned counsel for the State assisted by the learned counsel for the complainant has submitted that the injury attributed to the petitioner is grievous which attracts the provisions of Sections 323 and 326 IPC. It was submitted that for the injury attributed to the petitioner, the Court below declined him bail, though the same was granted to the other two accused namely Santokh Singh and Gurdial Singh. CRM-M 16641of 2009 3 After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the seriousness of the offence, I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Hence the bail application is hereby dismissed. Aug 27,2009 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge