CRIMINAL MISC. M NO.20518 OF 2010 :{ 1 }: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISION: DECEMBER 16, 2011 Madhu Gupta .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. N. C. Kinra, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. J. S. Rattu, DAG, Haryana, for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The status report of the present investigation in this case has been handed over to counsel for the petitioner. This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking direction to respondent Nos.1 to 3 to complete investigation in case FIR No.126, dated 8.3.2010. This FIR is registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC at Police Station Civil Lines, Rohtak. Prayer is to complete the investigation within some time bound period. CRIMINAL MISC. M NO.20518 OF 2010 :{ 2 }: The police has investigated the matter and has found that it is a complaint lodged by wife of Arun Gupta, who owed certain liabilities, for which allegedly some cheques were issued, which are now stated to have been stolen. The matter is being investigated. The investigation of this case is being conducted by DSP. Counsel for the petitioner has made a grievance that he is the same DSP against whom the petitioner has made certain allegations. The State counsel, on the other hand, points out that cancellation report is prepared in this case and likely to be filed. It would be now appropriate for the petitioner to contest the cancellation report as and when it is filed in the Court. The trial Court would be in an appropriate position to consider all the submissions. The petition is accordingly disposed of. December 16, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE