IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24648 of 1999 RAM PRAVESH SINGH @ RAM PROWESH SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 6/ 16.8.2010 None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the Union of India has been heard. After hearing him and also perusing the contents of the counter affidavit, especially the statements contained in paragraph 9 thereof, it appears admitted that the petitioner was not working in the factory concerned on the date of the occurrence as he had been transferred from there. A statement has been made that because of lack of knowledge about the transfer of the petitioner, he was named in the complaint petition as an accused. Considering the statement that it could be on account of misconception of fact that complaint was filed, the whole prosecution arising out of Complaint Case no. C 205 of 1991/ Tr. No. 968 of 1997 / 811/98 is quashed. The petition stands disposed of. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)