1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3800 of 2009 WRIT PETITION NO. 3800 of 2009 WRIT PETITION NO. 3800 of 2009 M/s. P.K.Internatinal ... Petitoner Vs. Union of India & Anr. ... Respondents Mr. Uday Warunjikar for the petitioner. Mr. A.S.Rao for the respondents. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND J.H.BHATIA, JJ. J.H.BHATIA, JJ. J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE: 16th April, 2009. DATE: 16th April, 2009. DATE: 16th April, 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. While passing an order it is not necessary to set out facts in the case. On behalf of the petitioner, the learned Counsel submits that they have waived the show cause as also the right of personal hearing. 2 3. The learned Counsel for the Revenue, on instructions, states that he will take one month’s time to complete investigation. 4. On completing the investigation if the respondents come to the conclusion that there is no over-invoicing, then to pass an appropriate order within four weeks thereafter. If the respondents come to the conclusion that there is under-invoicing, they will decide according to law. Rule is made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)