IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11587 of 2008 1. Mahendra Sah, Son of Mishri Sah. 2. Rajendra Sah, S/O Mishri Sah. 3. Sahendra Sah, S/O Mishri Sah. 4. Narayan Sah, S/O Mishri Sah. 5. Kaushalya Devi W/O Narayan Sah. 6. Shanti Devi, W/O Bhagwat Sah @ Pailu Sah. 7. Kamleshwari Sah @ Kamo S/O Bhagwat Sah @ Pailu Sah. 8. Ram Udgar Sah S/O Bhagwat Sah @ Pailu Sah. 9. Natho Sah, S/O Hakru Sah. 10. Laddu Sah S/O Bela Sah. 11. Ramchandra Sah S/O Rajendra Sah. 12. Dilip Sah S/O Rajendra Sah. 13. Ramswaroop Sah @ Fakira S/O Jilewi Sah. 14. Ram Badan Sah, S/O Late Jagat Sah. 15. Sitaram Sah, S/O Ram Badan Sah. 16. Pappu Sah, S/O Krishnadeo Sah. 17. Janak Sah S/O Bela Sah. All residents of Village- Paraura, P.S. Cheria Bariyarpur, District- Begusarai........................................................................Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR...................................Opposite party. ----------- 2. 30.04.2010. No one appears for the petitioners. The State is represented by Mr. Madhura Nand Jha. In the present application, the order dated 06.08.2007 is under challenge whereby the cognizance has been taken in complaint case no. 613(C) of 2002 under Sections 147, 342, 323 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the cognizance has been taken on the basis of the examination of four witnesses as well as the report of the Circle Officer, Chaurahi and the order passed in Cr. Revision No. 61 of 2003. 2 Hence, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order at this stage, however, the petitioners may raise all their contentions at the time of framing of charges if the charges have already not been framed. With this observation, this application is dismissed. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)