CWP No.18770 of 2009.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.18770 of 2009 Date of Decision: 02.07.2010 **** M/s. Rama Rice Mills and another . . . . Petitioners VS. UHBVNL & Others . . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. NL Sammi, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Mohnish Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3 ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioners seek quashing of the office memo (s) dated 3rd June, 2009 (Annexure P1 & P2), whereby, peak load electricity charges (PLEC) have been recovered from them. It is averred that the action of the respondents is contrary to the order dated 10.02.2009 passed by this Court in a batch of writ petitions including CWP No.6680 of 2008 (Haryana Chamber of Commerce and Industries & Others v. UHBVNL & Others) (Annexure P7). CWP No.18770 of 2009.doc - 2 – (2). Upon notice of motion, the respondents have filed their short-affidavit stating that vide memo dated 09.11.2009, the respondent-Corporation has refunded a sum of Rs.1,09,584/- to petitioner No.1 and Rs.59232/- to petitioner No.2 in compliance to the above-mentioned orders of this Court. (3). In this view of the matter, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of accordingly. (4). Dasti . (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 02.07.2010 vishal shonkar