IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 26TH AUGUST 2008 / 4TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 18621 of 2008(P) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- SUBRAMANIAN, KANNAMPURATH HOUSE, CHERAYA P.O., KONGAD, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. K.V.MANOJKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/08/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.18621/2008 P APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST RESPONDENT DTD. 3/08/2007. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE S.T.A.T., ERNAKULAM IN M.V.A.A.NO.559/2007 DTD.11/2/2008. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST RESPONDENT DTD. 22/05/2008. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) 18621 of 2008 -------------------------------------------------------- Dated: AUGUST 26, 2008 JUDGMENT Non-implementation of Ext.P2 judgment of the STAT in MVAA 559/2007, directing the respondents to grant the variation sought for is what is complained in this writ petition. 2. The respondents have no dispute of this factual position and therefore the writ petition is disposed of directing that the respondents shall implement Ext.P2 by granting the variation sought for. However, it is clarified that in case the terms of Ext.P2 are varied in any appropriate proceedings, the implementation of Ext.P2 will be subject to such variation. 3. Ext.P2 shall be implemented as expeditiously as possible, and at any rate, within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-