THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3186 of 2010 Dated:06.08.2010 Between: Mandava Purnachandra Rao. ….Petitioner And Mantripragada Seshagiri Rao, And others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3186 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner is the appellant in A.S.No.61 of 2007 on the file of the Court of the Principal District Judge, West Godavari at Eluru. In the said suit, the petitioner herein filed I.A.No.1292 of 2008. By an order dated 14.10.2008, the learned District Judge allowed the said application, and appointed an Advocate Commissioner to measure the plaint schedule land with the assistance of a Surveyor. As the order was in favour of the petitioner herein, the fourth respondent was aggrieved, and filed C.R.P.No.5662 of 2008 against the said order. In the said civil revision petition, by order dated 16.02.2009 this Court while observing that the second Commissioner cannot be appointed unless there are strong reasons, set aside the order of the Court below in I.A.No.1292 of 2008, and the parties were given liberty to file application for reentrustment of warrant to the Commissioner appointed by the trial Court. Emboldened by such observation, the petitioner herein filed I.A.No.558 of 2009 before the Principal District Judge, Eluru, for reentrustment of the warrant to the Advocate Commissioner appointed by the lower Court. Alleging that without passing orders in I.A.No.558 of 2009 the Court below is insisting on arguments in the appeal itself, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. After hearing the Counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the considered opinion that this Civil Revision Petition is not maintainable. Repeatedly this Court has held that a Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is maintainable only against an order or a decision of the Court below or subordinate to the High Court, and the power vested in the High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is not intended to regulate the roster or the method and manner of managing the Court. It is for the petitioner to persuade the Court below for disposal of I.A.No.558 of 2009. The Civil Revision Petition is, therefore, dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 06.08.2010 Note: Issue C.C by 09.08.2010 B/o. vs