WP(C) 2628/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE T VAIPHEI Heard Ms R Devi, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr K Das, the learne d standing counsel for the BTC. The writ petition is virtually directed against my order dated 3 0.03.2011 passed in WP(C) No. 1779/2011 without even filing a review petition. I n my order, I had allowed the writ petition partly and directed the BTC to comme nce the process of inviting tender to settle the fishery in question immediately and complete the same on or before 06.06.2011. In compliance with my order, the BTC have now floated the advertisement on 31.03.2011 and are now in the process of settling in favour of the highest bidder. Without challenging my order by ap propriate petition, this petitioner cannot be allowed to file a writ petition ch allenging the order of the BTC as well as my order. Moreover, I do not find any infirmity in my order which warrants a review thereof. In the result, this writ petition is bereft of merit and is accordingly dismissed at the threshold at the order stage.