1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3042 OF 2009 1) Madhukar s/o Mahadeo Khanapure, 2) Prabhu s/o vishwanath Ambekar, 3) Rajeshwar Sangram Khanapure, 4) Sahdeo s/o Shivraj Ambekar, All R/o- Kolpa, Taluka and District-Latur. ...PETITIONERS. VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary, Revenue Department, Maharashtra State, Mantralaya, Mumbai, 2) The District Collector, Latur, District-Latur, 3) The District Rehabilitation Officer, Latur, Dist-Latur, 4) The Tahsildar, Latur, District-Latur. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri. N.P. Patil (Jamalpurkar) Advocate for Petitioners. Shri. V.H. Dighe, A.G.P. for Respondents. ... 2 CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 10TH JUNE, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The Petitioners raised certain objections to allotment of plots. The Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 filed affidavit in reply, wherein in Para 5 it is averred that: "5. I say that, it is mere an apprehension of the Petitioner that, without holding an inquiry and without verifying the list provided by the Village Panchayat plots are going to be allotted. It is submitted that, a detail inquiry would be held and it would be ensured that the plots are allotted to the needy persons only. At present the allotment is not being done. 3 Presently land is not measured and divided into residential plots, after measuring the land the plots will be demarcated and thereafter only the office will be allotted to the persons who are found to be eligible. Therefore, the apprehension put forth in the petition is devoid of substance and there is no such action is being taken. Therefore, Petition is liable to be dismissed and interim orders passed by this Hon'ble High Court is liable to be vacated." 3. In the light of the statement made in the affidavit in reply, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. . Authenticated copy of this Order be provided to the learned A.G.P. [K.K. TATED, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] asb/JUNE10/wp3042.09