{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3481 OF 2009 Smt.Kaushalya Kishor Mhaske PETITIONER VERSUS The Union of India and others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.A.Y.Pandule, advocate for petitioner (Absent) Mr.Alok Sharma, Standing Counsel for Union of India. ....... [CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. and A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE : 17th July 2009 PER COURT: 1. Perused the petition. 2. None for the petitioner even at third call. The dismissal of the petition in default would not serve the ends of justice, as it invariably results in moving application for restoration which creates strain on the registry. 3. In the above circumstances, we went through the petition with the assistance of Standing Counsel for Union of India. Having {2} gone through the same we are of the considered view that the relief claimed by the petitioner in the petition cannot be granted since the petitioner is found to be ineligible to claim LPG distributorship. The petition is thus dismissed in liminie with no order as to costs. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] [V.C.DAGA, J.] drp/wp3481-09