- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. CONTEMPT PETITION NO.42 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2207 OF 2004 ... Mumbai Pune Taxi Tourist Service Centre ...Petitioner v/s. The Regional Transport Authority Mumbai Central & Ors. ...Respondents ... Ms.Bhavna Shah for the Petitioner. Mr.S.K.Nair AGR for the Respondents Nos. 1 to 3. Mr.P.B.Shaligram for Respondent No.5. ... CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. DATED: 12TH FEBRUARY,2007 - 2 - P.C.: . The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent No.5 places on record a copy of the order passed by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.5022 of 2006 dated 17th November, 2006. It is taken on record and marked "X" for identification. It appears from the order of the Supreme Court that the order made by the Division Bench of this court in Writ Petition No.2207 of 2004 dated 28-9-2004, which according to the Petitioner has been willfully violated by the Respondent No.5, has been set aside by the Supreme Court. Contempt petition, therefore, does not survive. Disposed of as such. ...