IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 9644 of 2011-E Decided on: November 14, 2011. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Surindera Sharma ……Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others …..Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood,, Addl. A.G. & Mr. J.K. Verma Dy. A.G. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “i) That the respondents may kindly be directed to transfer the present petitioner from her present place of posting to the station of her choice as mentioned in the body of the petition within time bound period.” 2. The petitioner should first file a representation before the second respondent and only in case the second respondent does not take action on the representation, she should have moved this Court, praying for a writ of mandamus, compelling the second respondent to take action on the petition. The petitioner submits that she has already made a representation, but none is seen produced in the writ petition. She prays that she may be permitted to make a fresh representation before the second respondent. It is always open for the petitioner to do so. In the event of the petitioner filing an appropriate representation before the second respondent within three weeks from today, the same will be considered by the second respondent and appropriate action, in accordance with law, adverting to the submissions made in the representation, shall be taken thereon within another three weeks. 3. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge 14th November, 2011 (rana/hl)