IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 10238 of 2008 Between: B. Tirupati Reddy S/o. B. Kista Reddy R/o. Tirumalapur (V), Narayanpet (M), Mahabubnagar Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Station House Officer, Narayanpet Police Station, Narayanpet, Mahabubnagar District. 2 Siongaram Harijan Danappa, S/o. Late Balannana R/o. Tirumalapur (V), Narayanpet (M), Mahabubnagar District. 3 Siongaram Harijan Chandrappa S/o. Late Balappa R/o. Tirumalapur (V), Narayanpet (M), Mahabubnagar District. 4 Siongaram Dastanna S/o. Late Balannana R/o. Tirumalapur (V), Narayanpet (M), Mahabubnagar District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue writ or order or dirwection more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the impugned action of the first respondent in interfering in peaceful possession of the respondent during the second week of April, 2008 and again on 26-4-2008 with serious threatenting over agriculatural Landa in Sy.No. 217 extent of Ac. 6.06 gts. of Tirumalapur Village, Narayanpet Mandal, Mahabubnagar District without any due process of law, as arbitrary, illegal, and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the 1st respondent not to interfere or disturb the peaceful possessions of the petititoner over the said lands without any due process of law to meet the ends of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.NARASIMHA SARMA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: When the matter was called on 21.7.2008, neither was the petitioner present nor was there any representation on his behalf. Accordingly, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, when the matter is taken up, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The Writ Petition is therefore dismissed for default. The interim order granted by this Court on 2.5.2008 stands dissolved. There shall be no order as to costs. GODA RAGHURAM, J Date: 29.7.2008 cvm