IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9144 of 2010 MOHAN RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 02.07.2010 Learned counsel for petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of the petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and the informant. Petitioner is languishing in jail since 16.10.2009 in connection with a case registered under Sections 365, 347, 323, 380 of the I.P.C. The petitioner being agnate of the informant alleged to have kidnapped the father of informant and consequently got some land transferred in his name. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in fact no transfer has been made moreover the victim was released on the alleged date of kidnapping itself. The victim’s statement has been recorded in paragraph No. 33 of the case diary who has not alleged anything specific against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State has not controverted the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. However learned counsel for the informant has submitted that informant is the only issue of the victim and the victim in his statement has expressed his willingness to give all his property to the informant. 2 Considering the rival submissions of the parties, the aforesaid case appears to have arisen due to the property dispute. Since the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner namely Mohan Rai, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur in connection with Nauwatpur P.S. Case No. 159 of 2009. Shageer (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)