s, ^. HIOH COUKT OF CHHATTISGARH AT OIASBUR lAftifRetitfori Na 236&(rf200t Peffltoner Subhash Chandra Shrivastava Aged - 50 yeare, Son of Late H.N. Sinha Postsd as - Upper Dhrision Teacher, At - S.S. Kalibadi Hr. Sec. School, Katibadi, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) R/o H.NO. H - ^), New Panchshed Nagar, Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. 2 3 The State of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secr^ary, School Educatton Ctepartment, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bharan, Raipur The Director, Public Irwtructkms, Chhatttsgarh Head Quarter at - Raipur. The Goveming Body erf Kalibadi Shiksha Samiti, Through-its School Secretary, S.S. Kali Badi Hr. Sec. School, Kalibadi, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Justice Shri Satish K. Agnihotri Present: Mr. R.K. Kesharwani, Advocate for the peftioner. h4s. Deepati Pandey, F^inel tawyerfortte respondents No. 1 and 2/State. ORDER (Passed on ttis 16m dayofApril, 2007) 1. The question of law involved hefein ia whether e non-teaching steff working in Government aided school are entBed to tie benefit of recommendaifons ofihe Fifih PayCommisa'on undertheprovisionsorthe Madhya Pradesh Ashaskiya Sikshan Sanstha (Adhyapakon Tatha Anya Karmchariyon Ke Veteino Ka Sandaya) Mhswyam, tQTS (henc^srth Ihs Adhiniyam, 1978') and 1h®rules made thereunder read witt»ttie Macftiya Pradesh Revision of Pay Rutos, 1988 (henceforth *the Pay Rules, t988^ Leamed counsel appearing for the petiUoner submits that the terms and conditions of the teaching and non-teaching staff are governed by the same provisions of taw which were under consideration by ttife Court in ttie matter of Smt. A. Lall vs. State of Chhatfi^arhand other connected matters (W.P. No. 4108 of 2005), wherein by tte judgment and order dated 6.2.2007, this Court held that the petitioners who arewerking in fully Govemment aided private schoote are entitted to the revised pay-scates with effect from 1.1.1996 as prescribed under the F^y Rutes, 1988. This Court ftirther for the purpose of payment of arreare had graitfed certain direction. Admittedly and jointly, it is submitted by the parties thrt ttiis matter is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 6.2.2007 pa^ed by this Court in the case of Smt. A. LEril vs. State of ChhatBsgarh and other connected mattere ^upra). As a result, for the reasons stated in ttie judgment and oKter dated 6.2.2007 [Mssed in W.P. No. 4108 of 2005 (Smt A. Lall w. State of ChhaUsgarh and other connected matters) (Supra), the writ pet'rtton is allowed in the same terms and condiUons. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge Thakur r •-f-!i