AJN 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2404 OF 2009 Khaleeq Ahmed Taufeeque Ahmed ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Ditendra Mishra for the petitioner. Mr. G.D. Utangale for respondent 3. Mr. S.G. Surana for respondents 4 and 5. CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : 9TH DECEMBER, 2009. P.C.:- 1. In this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed that respondents 2 and 3 i.e. the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and the Slum Rehabilitation Authority AJN 2 respectively, be directed to include the petitioner's name in the Annexure “II” for granting them alternate commercial structures under Slum Rehabilitation Scheme carried out by respondent 2. 2. The petitioner had approached the High Power Committee. The minutes of the decision of the High Power Committee are before us. In this petition, the petitioner has challenged the said minutes of the decision. The High Power Committee has observed that the petitioner has no documents such as Shops & Establishment Certificate on the cut off date 1/1/1995 and the documents shown, refer to Mr. Moh. Idris. By observing thus, the High Power Committee has dismissed the petitioner's application. We do not find any infirmity in the minutes of the decision. We are unable to disturb the said order. 3. We are informed that the petitioner has filed a suit in the City Civil Court at Bombay against the Municipal AJN 3 Corporation of Greater Bombay and others. The petitioner will be free to prosecute that suit. 4. The petition is dismissed. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.]