GPN-J-332-ARHCB-8_94-13,10,500-ALA4. SPL.H.C.A.S.C.D. 79e. FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1253 OF 2005 The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant versus Vishwanath @ Bitya Raghunath & anr ...Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri D.R.More APP for State. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & R.C. R.C. R.C. CHAVAN, JJ. CHAVAN, JJ. CHAVAN, JJ. DTAED; DTAED; DTAED; 10TH AUGUST, 2005 10TH AUGUST, 2005 10TH AUGUST, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. By this application State seeks leave to appeal against the order of acquittal passed in Sessions trial no. 32/2000 by 1st Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Palghar. The District Judge has, on marshalling of facts, came to a conscious conclusion that the prosecution evidence was inadequate to sustain any kind of conviction. The impugned order gives valid reasons. In our opinion, therefore, there is no reason to interfere. Leave to appeal is therefore rejected. ....