IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10873 of 2011 1. Dhurendhar Yadav. 2. Harinarayan Yadav Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 13.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Admittedly petitioner No. 1 is brother whereas petitioner No. 2 is father of the deceased. It is stated that they had committed the murder of the deceased. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that in course of investigation, it came to light that deceased wanted to purchase a piece of land and the petitioners were not ready for the above stated purchase and that was the reason the deceased committed suicide. It is further contended that none of the persons has claimed to have seen the actual killing of the deceased and there was no motive for committing the murder of the deceased. It would appear from perusal of the impugned order that in course of investigation some witnesses have stated that the deceased committed suicide and subsequently, his half burnt dead body was recovered from the field. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10, 000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah West Champaran in connection with Bhangaha P.S. Case No. 35 of 2010. Prakash ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)