IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN TUESDAY, THE 15TH MARCH 2011 / 24TH PHALGUNA 1932 OP(C).No. 229 of 2011(O) ------------------------ OS.811/2007 of SUB COURT,ERNAKULAM .................... PETITIONER/3RD DEFENDANT: -------------------------------------------- ABRAHAM PAUL, S/O. LATE N.V.PAUL, SENIOR AUDITOR, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, KALOOR, KOCHI-17. (NOW RESIDING AT CPWD QUARTERS, BLOCK 16, DOOR NO.647, KUNNUMPURAM, KAKKANAD.) BY ADV. SRI.BOBBYMATHEW KOOTHATTUKULAM RESPONDENT(S): PLAINTIFF: --------------------------------------------- ACHAMMA, W/O. LATE K.M.MATHEW, RESIDING AT KITHAYIL HOUSE, ITHITHANAM KARA, KURICHI VILLAGE, CHANGANASSERY TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 549. BY ADVS. SRI.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE, SRI.ARJUN S.RAJ. THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss P.BHAVADASAN, J. ---------------------------------------------------- OP(C) No.229 of 2011 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of March 2011 Judgment In this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution, the petitioner seeks a direction to the Sub Court, Ernakulam to dispose of Ext.P4 application filed by him in OS NO.811/07 filed by the respondent herein. It is pointed out that there is an interim order in the case and the matter has not been heard so far. It is also brought to the notice of this court that the suit was listed twice and it was removed from the list for various reasons. Apart from anything else, even assuming that the transfer of property is made, it is a lis pendens transfer and the transferee is bound by the decree. In view of the above facts, there is no necessity to give any direction to dispose of Ext.P4. OPC 229/2011 2 However, it is directed that the suit may be disposed of as expeditiously as possible. The OP is disposed of as above. P.Bhavadasan, Judge sta OPC 229/2011 3