IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW PETITION NO.3 OF 2007 PETITION NO.3 OF 2007 PETITION NO.3 OF 2007 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION 2738 OF 1994 PETITION 2738 OF 1994 PETITION 2738 OF 1994 Shri Arun B.Kasbekar ..Petitioner Vs. The Charity Commissioner & Ors. ..Respondents Mr.V.S.Lonkar for the Petitioner. Mamata Sadh, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1 State. Mr.S.U.Kamdar with G.S.Pikale i/b.S.V.Pikale & Co. for Respondent Nos.2 to 7. Shailesh Shah i/b.Sunil & Co. for Respondent No.8. CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 13TH JUNE,2007 : 13TH JUNE,2007 : 13TH JUNE,2007 (In (In (In Chamber at 2.30pm) Chamber at 2.30pm) Chamber at 2.30pm) P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner, the learned Counsel for Respondent No.1, the learned Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 to 7 and the learned Counsel for Respondent No.8. The learned Counsel for Respondent No.8 tenders the affidavit-in-reply dated 12th June, 2007, the same is taken on record. The learned Counsel appearing for Respondent Nos.2 to 7 again reiterated the statement made on 15th December,2006 before us, stating that the agreement for sale entered upon by them with Respondent No.8 herein has already been revoked and cancelled. In view thereof, we make it clear that the sanction granted by the Charity Commissioner, for the above sale has become non-est. Hence, we are not inclined to entertain this Review Petition, the same stands dismissed. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)