IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19632 of 2008 ISTAK ANSARI Versus THE STATE OFBIHAR ----------- 2/ 30/7/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner renews his prayer for bail in a police case under Section-302/34 of I.P.C. and 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant, an eye-witness, has since deposed. In paragraph-1 and 2 of the deposition he names the accused and the firing by them when there is no reference to the petitioner. At paragraph-4 of his examination-in- chief he states that he recognizes the petitioner and that he was not one of the five named persons named by him. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner Istak Ansari be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No.5, Sitamarhi in Sessions Trial No.216/07 arising out of Kanhauli P.S. Case No.28/05 (G.R.No.1746/2005). KC ( Navin Sinha,J )