WP(C) 4356/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE I.A. ANSARI Heard Mr. A. S. Choudhury, learned Senior counsel, for the petitioner, and Mr. P . Chakraborty, learned counsel, for the respondent Nos.1 and 2. Heard also Mr. D . Das, learned counsel, for the respondent Nos.3 to 7. The grievance of the petitioner is, in brief, thus: The petitioner had been appo inted as an Assistant Teacher at Saragaon M.E. School by its Managing Committee pursuant to the resolution adopted in the Managing Committee in its Meeting held on 01.08.92 and, since then, he has had been working as an Assistant Teacher in the said school without any break. In the past, the petitioner had received the share of financial assistance from the financial grant received by the said sch ool from the Government. The petitioner complains that he has recently heard, fr om a reliable source, that in connivance with the respondent No.5, namely, Distr ice Elementary Education Officer, Chirang, respondent No.9, namely, Head Master, Saragaon M.E. School, has prepared a select list in favour of respondent Nos.10 and 11 so that in the process of provincilisation, in stead of the petitioner, the service of the respondent Nos.10 and 11 be provincialised, though the petiti oner, as already indicated hereinbefore, claims that he is senior to both respon dent No.10 as well as respondent No.11 as Assistant Teacher in the said school. In fact, the petitioner has also made a representation, dated 18.07.2011, in thi s respect, to the respondent No.4, namely, Director of Education, Bodoland Terri torial Council, Kokrajhar, but the said representation has not yet been disposed of. Considering the fact that the petitioner has already made a representation, date d 18.07.2011, addressed to the respondent No.4 herein, this writ petition is dis posed of with direction to the respondent No.4, namely, Director of Education, Bodoland Territorial Council, Kokrajhar, to examine the petitioner’s grievances in the light of the representation aforementioned and pass appropriate order(s) thereon. The whole exercise, so directed, shall be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by the respondent No.4. The petitioner may furnish to the respondent No.4 a certified copy of this order along with a copy of the writ petition and annexures thereto. If the peti tioner feels aggrieved by the decision(s), which may be taken by the respondents , particularly, respondent No.4, or by the order(s), which may be passed by the respondents, the petitioner shall remain at liberty to take recourse to such pro visions of law as may be permissible. No order as to costs.