1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4349 OF 2009 1. Hindi Prachar Mandal & 2 ors. ....Petitioners vs 1. Shri Pawankumar J. Tiwari & anr. ....Respondents Mr. A.G. Kothari for the Petitioners. Mr. G.D. Uttangale i/b M/s. Uttangale & Co. for the Respondent No.1. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 13TH JANUARY, 2010. P.C. :- 1. The impugned order warrants no interference. Admittedly, the procedure for considering the appointment of in-house candidates has not been undertaken. In view thereof, the appointment of Petitioner No.3 to the post was set aside and first Respondent was ordered by Petitioners No.1 and 2 i.e. the management to be considered for appointment. 2 2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners states that the procedure for considering in-house candidates will be undertaken and completed on or before 28th February, 2010. Upto 28th February, 2010, the Petitioners No.1 and 2 shall be entitled to continue Petitioner No.3 in their services, but at their risk, including as to the salary of Petitioner No.3. 3. Petition, accordingly, disposed of.