- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.537 OF 2006 BK Mangalabahen and Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra through Ambarnath Police St. and Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.Nitin Vhatkar & Prajit Manjrekar Advocate for Petitioners Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, A.P.P. for Respondent-State ... CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : MARCH 7, 2006 DATE : MARCH 7, 2006 DATE : MARCH 7, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The petitioners have challenged the order of issuance of process by the Magistrate. They contend that the police report in this regard was in the negative and in their favour and inspite of that Magistrate has issued process against them. We have perused the copy of the complaint. It appears that the Magistrate has used its discretion in issuing process. In our view, the petitioners should approach appropriate Court for redressal of - 2 - their grievances and proper reliefs. Counsel for the petitioners states that petitioner nos.1 and 2 are sisters and other accused nos.3 to 6 have been exempted from their personal appearance, therefore, if the petitioner nos.1 and 2 also do apply to Magistrate for exemption, the Magistrate shall consider and grant them exemption taking undertaking from their counsel that he should keep them present before the Court as and when necessary. 2. With the above directions, the petition is disposed of. [D.G.DESHPANDE, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]