IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.25287 of 2011 Raju Sahani son of Ram Jash Sahani Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2/ 05.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the co-accused similarly placed have been granted bail, but in my view, the case of the accused persons are different on facts. Considering that the petitioner is named in the First Information Report as one of the dacoits, who committed robbery, I am not inclined to grant bail to petitioner. Prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial in view of the serious nature of the offence. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge provided his case is not bifurcated for the purpose of commitment or charge. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)