In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh RFA No. 4105 of 2007 (O&M) Hazara Singh (deceased) through LRs and another ..... Appellants vs State of Punjab and another .... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. Navdeep Sukhna, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Rajesh Bindal J. By filing the present appeal, the landowners are seeking further enhancement of compensation for the acquired land. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the State of Punjab vide notification dated 21.2.2000 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act'), acquired land of Village Sohana, Tehsil and District Mohali, for setting up of residential Urban Estate. The Land Acquisition Collector assessed the market value of the acquired land at different rates for the land situated at different places. Dissatisfied with the award of the Collector, the landowners filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned court below determined the market value of the acquired land @ Rs. 17 lacs per acre. It is this award which is impugned in the present appeal. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the issue raised in the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in RFA No. 3004 of 2006 – Surjit Singh vs State of Punjab and another decided on 2.3.2009, whereby the compensation payable for acquisition of land vide same notification has been further enhanced. Learned State counsel did not dispute this factual position. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in Surjit Singh's case (supra), the appeal is disposed of in the same terms. 4.5.2010 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge