IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22723 of 2011 Mohit Kumar, S/o Late Amarnath Singh. Versus The State of Bihar ----------- 02. 26.07.2011 Supplementary-affidavit filed today be kept on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 392/411 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was refused bail by order dated 21.09.2010 on the ground that some money was recovered from the petitioner’s possession and he had been identified in the Test Identification Parade. The prayer for bail has been renewed on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 23.05.2010 and in the Test Identification Parade the witnesses had identified the petitioner on a motorcycle keeping a watch and no further overt act was alleged against him. Considering the same as also there is only one other case pending against the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Shri S.K. Tiwari, Judicial Magistrate, Gaya (or its successor) in connection with Civil Lines P.S. Case No. 147 of 2010 (T.R. No. 1661 of 2011) subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall 2 be the mother of the petitioner namely Geeta Devi. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The fact that the petitioner is an accused in one other case will be verified by the Magistrate concerned before releasing the petitioner on bail. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)