IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39030 of 2009 1. SUKHDEO SINGH, SON OF LATE SARYUG SINGH 2. AMIT KUMAR @ MOHAN, SON OF SUKHDEO SINGH 3. PUNIT KUMAR @ MADAN, SON OF SUKHDEO SINGH ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NANDNAMA, P.S. HALSI, DISTRICT LAKHISARAI. ---- PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. MANI BHUSHAN SINGH, SON OF LATE RAMANUJ SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE, P.O. AND P.S. SAMHO, DISTRICT BEGUSARAI. ---- OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 2 10.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. This application has been filed challenging the order dated 16.10.2009 passed by Fast Track Court No. 2, Lakhisarai in Sessions Trial No. 373 of 2006 arising out of Halsi P.S. Case No. 83 of 2004 by which the Court has refused the prayer of the petitioners to call for the original copy of recruitment records with respect to post of Constable made in the year 2004. The petitioners have produced a photo copy of the record which shows that the recruitment process took place on 4.10.2004 whereas this occurrence has taken place on 5.10.2004. The petitioners knew very well that they had to face trial and were made accused in this case. They had all the opportunity to apply for a certified copy and if the certified copy was not supplied to him, they could apply under the right to information before commencement of the trial. Under the circumstances, I do not see any anomaly in the order dated 16.10.2009. This application is dismissed. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)