1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC(T) No.188 of 2008. Decided on: 27.10.2010. Biri Singh ….. Petitioner. Versus Vijay Kumar Bansal and another …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the petitioner : For the respondents : Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General, for respondent No.1. Mr. Lokender Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral): The petitioner has approached this Court complaining of contempt of Court committed by the respondents. The learned Addl. Advocate General submits that in view of stand taken in the reply and in view of the intervening developments, it cannot be said that there is any willful disobedience of the order passed by the Tribunal. Therefore, the contempt petition is dismissed without prejudice to the liberty to the petitioner to pursue his grievance in appropriate proceedings in which event, such an attempt shall not be rejected on the only ground of delay since the 2 petitioner has been prosecuting his grievance in the contempt proceedings. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Kuldip Singh), Judge. October 27, 2010 (sks/grs)