IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34464 of 2010 1. DINESH SAH @ DINESH SAH KALWAR, SON OF YUGAL SAH KALWAR, 2. RINKU DEVI, WIFE OF DINESH SAH KALWAR. 3. UMESH SAH, SON OF YUGAL SAH KALWAR, ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BANAULI, P.S. SURSAND, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI --- PETITIONERS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR —OPP. PARTY. ----------- 4/ 26-03-2011 Earlier the present petition was dismissed for non-prosecution by an order dated 18.01.2011. However, subsequently it was restored by an order dated 22.02.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 5896 of 2011. Today also despite repeated calls, nobody is present on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition. However, I have heard learned Addl. P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. From perusal of the material on record, this Court finds that the petitioners are accused in a criminal prosecution registered under sections 304(B)/201/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners are specifically named in the F.I.R. as accused and there is specific allegation of their participation in the crime in question, being the close family members of the deceased. In that view of the matter, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. The petitioners must surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today in connection with Sursand P.S. Case No. 82 of 2 2009 dated 02.06.2009 pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M., Pupari at Sitamarhi and if so advised, seek regular bail. BTiwary/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)