IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.14814 of 2008 Date: 8th September, 2010 Between: A.Satyanarayana .. Petitioner And A.P. Transco Ltd., rep. by its Assistant Divisional Engineer, Peddagunta Sub-Station, Vanasthalipuram, Ranga Reddy district. .. Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.14814 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: According to the petitioner, he is the absolute owner and possessor of the premises bearing H.No.6-3-1596/89/S-2/C-89 situated at Sachivalayanagar, Vanasthalipuram, Hyderabad, having succeeded to the same from his father by virtue of a Family Settlement and electricity service connection bearing No.1565 was allotted to the said premises. While so, his brothers, in collusion with some third parties, caused interference with his possession and enjoyment in respect of the subject premises, based on some fabricated documents, and therefore, he filed a suit in O.S.No.3046 of 2007 on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy district, for perpetual injunction and the same is pending for trial. The petitioner alleges that though he has been regularly paying electricity consumption charges for his premises, the respondent had disconnected power supply to the premises abruptly on 3.7.2008. Hence, this writ petition is filed seeking appropriate directions. In the counter affidavit filed by the respondent, it is stated that service connection bearing No.1565, which was allotted to the subject premises, stands in the name of one Y.Suresh Kumar. It is also stated that basing on the representation submitted by the said Y.Suresh Kumar, for disconnection of power supply to the subject premises, power supply has been disconnected. In the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner is directed to file a detailed application to the respondent, as required under law, along with challan etc., for obtaining new service connection or transferring the said service connection No.1565 in the name of petitioner, if not already done. On filing such application, the respondent is directed to consider the same, as per law, and dispose of within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order and communicate the same to the petitioner. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 8.9.2010 DA/VV