E ,/. IN THE HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. N0. ^ ^ 3^7 2005 PETITIONER : /- Kamal Kumar Nishad S/o Late S.N. Nishad, aged about 35 years, R/o Village Hirapur, Post Tatibandh, District Raipur (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS L. -y^ ^/^/ ^At7 ^M/ 5/^7s Jw •^ •<f : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Public Works Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chief Engineer, P.W.D. (Building 85 Road), Behind All India Radio, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3. Superintendent Engineer, P.W.D. (Building and Road), Behind all India Radio, Raipur, Dist. Raipur (C.G.). 4. Executive Engineer, P.W.D. (Building & Road), Division 1, Katora Talab, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OP INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OR MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION. CERTIORARI ETC. OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION fS| OR ORDER (S^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B. : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTM, J. WRIT PETITION N0.4734 OF 2005 Petitioner Kamal Kumar Nishad versus Respondents State ofChhattisgarh and others ~i», Present : Mr. Ashok Patil, counsel for the petitioner. Mrs. Anju Aliuja, Deputy Govemment Advocate for the respondents/State. ORDER (Passed on 7th ofSeptember, 2006) The father of the petitioner, namely, Late Shri S.N. Nishad died while working as Assistant Grade-II in the Department ofPublic Works in hamess on 26-3-1999. 2. Thereafter, the petitioner made an application for compassionate appointment, which according to the petitioner was rejected on the ground that fhe deatli ofthe deceased employee took place prior to creation ofthe present State ofChhattisgarh. . ^ 3. The Govemment of Chhattisgarh, by its circular dated 2-2-2006, has directed all the departmente to consider cases ofall the eligible dependent legal heir of the deceased employees, who died in harness between 1-11-1997 to 31-10-2000, for compassionate appointment. 4. Accordingly, the Govemment of Chhattisgarh is directed to consider the case ofthe petitioner as per its own circular dated 2-2-2006 and also in view ofthe order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.3879/2004 and other connected matters, on its own merit, in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks, on such representation being filed by the petitioner. 5. For the reasons above-stated, the writ petition stands disposed of No order as to costs. Certified copy as per mles. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gopal