FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2132 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.24572 OF 2008 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ This application is taken out for condonation of delay of 211 days caused in filing the appeal. The applicants had filed MACP No.59 of 2005 under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 claiming an amount of Rs.6,00,000/- as and by way of compensation on account of death of their son Shyam. By judgment and order dated 8th February, 2008 the Tribunal partly allowed the claim petition and directed the respondents to pay jointly and severally compensation of Rs.3, 93,500/- including NFL amount of Rs.50,000/- to the applicants. 2 I heard Shri Manoj Shelke, learned Counsel in support of this application and Shri Ambhore, learned Counsel for Respondent No.2 Insurance Company. Though respondent No.1 is served, nobody appears for him. In the application, it is set out that the applicants could file the present appeal only after receiving the amount in November, 2008 through execution proceedings. The applicants have lost their only son who was maintaining and looking after the present applicants and that, there is no other source of income to them. 3 After hearing the learned Counsel for the parties, I am satisfied that the applicants have made out sufficient cause for condoning the delay. The civil application deserves to be allowed. 4 Hence, for the reasons set out in the application, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) with no order as to costs. (R.G. KETKAR, J.) 23.11.2009. PLK/*