In the Hon’ble High Court of Chhattishgarh at Bilasgur (C.G. WP. (S) N6. Q {452 2009 PetitionerS /(1) Roop Lal Gharendra, aged 44 years, S/o Shri Siyaram Dharendra, U.D.T., Govt. Middle School, Jhalmala Block Balod, Distt. Durg // (2 ) Dharmuram Jaishwal, aged 52 years S/o Shri Fatte Lal Jaishwal, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Gainji, Distt. Durg /_ (3) Smt. Hirman Chaurke, Aged 4O years, W/O Shri Jhumukh Lal Chaurke, U.D.T., Govt. Girls Primary School, Dondi—Lohara, Distt. Durg /. (4) Smt. Varuni Dilliwar, Aged 48 years W/o Shri Vidhyabhushan Dilllwar Assistant Teacher, Govt. Girls Primary School, Dondi-Lohara Distt. Durg y (5) Nohar Lal Arya, aged 48 years, / S/o Shri Shyam Lal Arya, Head Master, Govt. Primary School, Bundali, Dondi—Lohara, Distt. Durg / (6) Shravan Kumar Joshi, Aged 43, S/o Shri Deendayal Joshi, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Salhe Distt. Durg / (7) Kaushal Prashad Ratre, Aged 35 years S/o Shri Tamulal Ratre U.D.T., Govt. Middle School, Bhim- Kanhar, Block Dondi-Lohara Distt. Drurg /. (8) Ishwar Lal Thakur, Aged 45 years a S/o Shri Ram Prashad Thahur U.D.T., Govt. Middle School, Persuli K, Block Dondi-Lohara Distt. Durg /(9) Ramesh Kumar Sahu, Aged 33 years S/o Shri Santh Ram Sahu, Head-Master, Govt. Primary School, Munda—Tola, Block Dondi-Lohara Distt. Durg (10) Murli Ram Bhuarya, Aged 39 years S/o Shri ltwari Ram Bhuarya, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Parsuli, Block Dondi-Lohara Distt. Durg / [ @ /(1 1) Mangia S/o Shri Ram Fate' Qawde, Singh Gawde, Aged 44 years U.D.T. Govt. Middle School, Gainji, Block Dondi-Lohara Distt. Durg / (12) S/o Bhuneshwer Shri Purushottam Singh, Aged Singh 45 Badhendra years, U.D.T., Govt. Middle School, Revagahan, Block Dondi—Lohara Distt. Durg /(/1 3) Blmneshwari Sudhakar, Aged 40 years U.D.T., Govt. Middle School, Devri, Block Dondi-Lohara Distt. Durg /(l4) ‘ Kamal S/o Shri Singh Shivraj Bhuar, Singh Aged Bhuar, 40 years, U.D.T. Govt. Middle School, Revagahan, W/o Shri PR. Sudhakar Block Dondi—Lohara Distt. Durg (15) Romlal Ghawade, Aged 46 years S/o Shri Balduram Ghawade, U.D.T., Govt. Middle School, Khertha— Bazar, Block Dondi—Lohara Distt. Durg S/o Shri Gam Lal Patil School, / (l 6) Narendra Kumar Patil, Aged 43 years U.D.T., Govt. Middle School, Ihal-Mala Block Balod, Distt. Durg (l7) Nand Kumar Deshmukh, Aged 44 years S/o Shri Radhe Ram Deshmukh U.D.T., Govt. Middle School, Podi Block Balod Distt. Durg /(/1/8) Dharmendra Kosta, Aged 44 years S/o Shri Mamakhan Lal Kosta, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary Maharajpur, Distt. Durg a9) Rajendra Krishna Khnriya, A‘ged 33. Years, S/o Shri Dhruram Khilriya Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Gondmarra, Distt. Durg (20) Shukhnandan Singh Dewangan, Aged 50 Years, S/o Shri Chain Singh Deewangon, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Khertha—Bazar, Block Dondi—Lohara, Distt. Durg / 21) Khemlal Dhritlahre, Aged 43 years S/o Shri Bgnthuram Dhrutlahre /< Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Jhitiya Block Dondi—Lohara Distt. Durg /(22) Satyanarayan Yadav, Aged 49 years S/o Ramsingh Yadav, Head-Master, Govt. Primary School, Deur—Tarai, Distt. Durg Versus Respondents ....../l. State Government of Chhattishgarh, School Education Department Ministry, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) /2. District Education Officer, Durg. m5“ ~ gqya gets) Through the Secretary, Writ Petition under Article issuance of Writ or Mand 226 ‘of the Constitution of India for amus/Direction or other apnropriate writ HIGH COU RT OF CHHATTI$GARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETiTlON (S) No. $1 72 of 2009 PETITIONERS : Roop Lai Gharendra & 21 others. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & another. WRIT PETI‘HON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF lNDiA SB: Hcn’b!e Shri Satish K. Aqnihotri, J. Present: Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Pane! Lawyer for the State/respondents. GRAL CBRDER (Passed on 05m day of January, 2010) Heard learned counsel for the parties. . By this petition, the petitioners seek a direction to the respondents to pay two advance increments from the date of passing of D.Ed examination, on their own expenses, during their service period. ' Shri Verma, learned counsei appearing for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in the present case is no longer res integra as the same has been considered and decided by this Court in the matter of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj v. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another’ and Gopesh Kumar Verma v. The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and another} . Shri Verma further submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision as aforestated. Thus, the petitioners may be permitted to make a representation to decide their case in the light of atorestated decision, subject to verification of the fact asto whether the petitioners have acquired D.Ed certificate on their own expenses during the course of their service. . Learned counsel appearing for the Statefrespondents submits that in the event, the petitioners makes a representation, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with law and in the light of the decision of this Coult in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj and Gopesh Kumar Verma (supra), within a period of four“ weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. . in view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. ; Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge i 2006 (It) MPJR CG 96 2 WP (S) No.4130 of2005 . “ r