IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 9556 of 2008. Decided on: 14.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Narottam Dutt Dharmani. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Kulbhushan Khajuria, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate appearing vice Mr. Kulbhushan Khajuria, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has become infructuous with the passage of time. Consequently, the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 14, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?