IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3945 of 2011 BIRENDRA KUMAR & ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 16-3-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners prayer for anticipatory bail was earlier rejected by order dated 9-9-2010 contained in annexure-1. The prayer has been renewed on the ground that the parties have entered into compromise and filed a petition to this effect before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda, Biharsharif. A copy of the compromise petition which does not bear the signature of the parties has been annexed as annexure-5. The offences are under sections 420 of the I.P.C. and section 138 of the Negotiable Instrumentation Act. Instead of issuing notice upon the other side and considering the legal issue, it is deemed proper that the plea raised on behalf of the petitioners be examined by the learned court below if they surrender and seek regular bail within 8 weeks. This application is accordingly disposed of with a direction that if the petitioners surrender before the court below within eight weeks and satisfy the court that they have 2 entered into compromise, in that event, their prayer for bail shall be considered positively on the date of surrender itself. Naresh ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)