BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Nineteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.16199 of 2011 1. SEETHALAKSHMI 2. KESAVAN @ KESAVARAJ 3. SURESH KUMAR ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1,4,5 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, MADURAI.(CR.NO.84 OF 2011) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.M.A.JINNAH Advocate For Respondent : MR.C.RAMESH, Additional Public Prosecutor ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 120(b), 419, 468, 471 and 420 I.P.C. in Crime No.84 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been arrayed as A1, A4 and A5 and they have been implicated on the allegation that the petitioners said to have impersonated the original owner and executed the sale deed and the incident said to have taken place as early as in the year 2009. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that they have been falsely implicated in this case. 3. Mr.C.Ramesh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioners have been arrayed as A1, A4 and A5 and they have been implicated on the allegation that the petitioners said to have impersonated the original owner and executed the sale deed and the incident said to have taken place as early as in the year 2009. It is submitted that the investigation is pending. 4. The fact remains that the alleged incident said to have taken place as early as in the year 2009 and the complaint was prepared only in the year 2011 and further the entire allegations are borne out by records and documents. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, this https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each with one surety for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said learned Judicial Magistrate or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioners 2 and 3 shall report before the respondent police daily at 5.30 p.m. for a period of six weeks and thereafter, they shall be available for interrogation as and when required and the first petitioner being a lady, she shall be available for interrogation as and when required. sd/- 19/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, MADURAI. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, MADURAI. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. S.M.A.JINNAH Advocate SR.No.44448 SR : 21.12.2011 : 2P/6C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16199 of 2011 Date :19/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/