1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10662 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.10662 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.10662 OF 2004 Manohar S. Ingle ...Petitioner Vs. Dr.Y.K.Thombare & Ors. ...Respondents ----- Mr.A.A.Garge for Petitioner Ms. Shilpa Telhar for Respondent No.1 Mrs.S.S.Bhende, A.G.P. for Respondent No.3 CORAM: H.L.GOKHALE & CORAM: H.L.GOKHALE & CORAM: H.L.GOKHALE & SMT.R.S.DALVI,JJ. SMT.R.S.DALVI,JJ. SMT.R.S.DALVI,JJ. DATED: 21ST JULY, 2005 DATED: 21ST JULY, 2005 DATED: 21ST JULY, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Mr. Garge in support of this Petition. Ms. Shilpa Talhar appears for Respondent No.1. Mrs. Bhende, A.G.P. appears for Respondent No.3. The Petition is seeking certain information from Respondent No.1 who is a Principal of one B.N.N. College at Bhiwandi. Respondent No.2 to this Petition is the Administrator of this College. This information is with respect to the functioning of the College and the Respondent No.1 has sent a letter way back on 24th November, 2003 stating that the information is being collected and as soon as the same is collected, it will be made available to the Petitioner. More than a year and half has gone, this information has not been made available. 2. As far as the Petitioner is concerned he also does not seem to be much interested in this 2 information, in as much as he has filed this Petition after a year and has not cared to move it for six months thereafter. 3. In any case now that the Petition has reached before this Bench we have heard Mr.Garge in support of this Petition and Ms. Talhar for Respondent No.1. In view of this letter dated 24th November, 2003 we presume that the Respondent must have collected the information as required by now. We direct him to make it available to the Petitioner within two weeks hereafter. 4. Mr. Garge states that Respondent No.2 to this Petition is the first Appellate Authority under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Right of Indormation Act, 2002. Mr. Garge says that the appeal is already filed. We expect the Respondent No.2 to decide the appeal within four weeks from the receipt of the copy of this order. It will be open to the Petitioner to seek further remedies under this Act thereafter. The Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (H.L.GOKHALE,J.) (H.L.GOKHALE,J.) (H.L.GOKHALE,J.) (SMT.R.S.DALVI,J.) (SMT.R.S.DALVI,J.) (SMT.R.S.DALVI,J.)