1 upa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.894 OF 2006 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.218 OF 2006 ARBITRATION PETITION NO.218 OF 2006 ARBITRATION PETITION NO.218 OF 2006 Devikrishna Rajaram Keni ).. Petitioner Versus Mayur Desai ).. Respondent Mr.Tanvir Shaikh for the Petitioner. Mr.Niranjan Jagtap i/b.M/s.Mohana Nair Associates for the Respondent. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 2ND AUGUST 2006 DATED : 2ND AUGUST 2006 DATED : 2ND AUGUST 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The present Chamber Summons has been filed for amending the cause title of the Petition. In the Petition, the Petitioner is shown as an individual i.e. Devikrishna Rajaram Keni, Director of Rajaram Stock Broking Company Pvt. Ltd. and the Respondent is also shown as an individual i.e. Mayur Desai, Director of Panacea Management & Marketing Services Pvt. Ltd. 2. Admittedly, the arbitration was between two Companies, namely, Rajaram Stock Broking Company Pvt. Ltd. and Panacea Management & Marketing Services Pvt. Ltd. The Award reflects this position. 2 3. The Petition is not admitted. In my view, the Petition can be amended at this stage as there is an error in joining the Director as a party instead of the Company. 4. Chamber Summons allowed. Amendment to be carried out within two weeks. 5. Chamber Summons disposed off accordingly. 6. Place the Petition for admission thereafter.