- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION No.311 OF 2005 Kishor N. Chemburkar & Anr. ... Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents Mrs. Deepa Sawant, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. S. K. Chinchalikar, Advocate for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : D. G. KARNIK, J. : D. G. KARNIK, J. : D. G. KARNIK, J. DATE DATE DATE : SEPTEMBER 7, 2006. : SEPTEMBER 7, 2006. : SEPTEMBER 7, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and AGP for respondent. Learned AGP states that the order has been complied and all the payment has been made. Learned counsel for the petitioner admits that payment has been received. Learned AGP states that the delay in payment was on account of want of necessary financial sanctions and was not deliberate. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the explanation be accepted. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the Contempt Petition. Hence, Contempt Petition is disposed of. [ D. G. KARNIK, J. ] D. G. KARNIK, J. ] D. G. KARNIK, J. ]