IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-25704 of 2010 Date of decision:- 19.11.2010 Baldev Singh and others ... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present:- Mr. R.K. Kapila, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amandeep Singh Rai, AAG, Punjab. SABINA, J The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure praying for issuance of directions to respondents No. 1 and 2 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners, which is being infringed by the respondent No. 4, who is misusing his powers for extraneous considerations at the behest of respondent No. 6 and further for protection from false implication at the hands of respondent No. 6. Learned State counsel has filed reply on behalf of the respondents No. 1 to 5 wherein it has been stated that respondent No. 6 had filed an application before Women Cell. A detailed inquiry was conducted by Surinder Singh, Sub Inspector, CAW&C Cell, Ludhiana and it was found that Paramjit Kaur was married with Parveen Kumar as per Sikh rites on 29.1.2006 at Mehak Palace, Raikot. The allegations levelled qua dowry articles given by the applicant at the time of marriage falls under the Crl. Misc. No. 25704 of 2010 -2- jurisdiction of Police District, Jagraon whereas applicant-Paramjeet Kaur was resident of Barnala and the family members of her in-laws were resident of Chandigarh. Hence, Ludhiana Police could not take any action in the matter. The application moved by respondent No. 6 has since been filed and consigned to the record room. In these circumstances, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the same is dismissed as such. (SABINA) November 19, 2010 JUDGE shabha