IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 24277 of 2004 Between: Saladi Yasoda, W/o. Anjaiah, R/o. 25-8-38, Diesel Colony, Kajipet, Warangal. ..... PETITIONER AND The Warangal Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Warangal. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or direction preferably writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent in disposing of the latest application the inaction of the respondent in disposing of the latest application of the petitioner dated. 22-11-2004 for change of name in respect of house No. 25-8-38, Diesel Colony, Kajipet, Warangal, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent to take immediate steps to effect change in the records by disposing of the application dated. 22-11-2004 within a reasonable time. For the Petitioner: MR.KOWTURU VINAYA KUMAR, Advocate For the Respondent: MR.K.VENUGOPAL REDDY, SC for Warangal Municipal Corporation The Court at the stage of admission made the following: ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for respondent-Municipal Corporation and with their consent the writ petition itself is disposed of at the stage of admission. The petitioner claims to be owner of the house bearing No.25-8-38 situated at Diesel colony, Kajipet within the limits of respondent- Municipal Corporation. Her grievance is that since demand notices for the house have been issued in the name of one N. Padamarao, she made a representation, dated 22-11-2004 to the respondent for mutation of her name as the owner thereof in the Municipal records, but no action has been taken so far. Hence, the writ petition. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to direct the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 22-11- 2004 and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, expeditiously. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. No costs. ______________ N.V. RAMANA, J Date: 27-12-2004 Svv To 1. The Commissioner, Warangal Municipal Corporation, Warangal. 2. Two C.D.copies.