IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 22ND JANUARY 2009 / 2ND MAGHA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 1596 of 2008(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.34348/2006 Dated 18/10/2007 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER: -------------------------- N.GANAPATHY NAMBOOTHIRI, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O.VASUDEVAN NAMBOODIRI, NAGANCHERY MANA, ALLAPPRA P.O., PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH VIJAYAN RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS: --------------------------- 1. THULASIDHARAN THAMPI, AGE NOT KNOWN, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY, THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, DEVASWOM BOARD SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. NALINAKSHAN, AGE NOT KNOWN AND SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.P.G.PARAMESWARA PANICKER (SR.) FOR R1 & 2 SRI.P.GOPAL FOR R1 & 2 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- C.O.C.1596/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of January, 2009 JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an amount has been received by the petitioner from the Board towards the benefits, as directed in Annexure-A1 judgment. But no statement as such has been supplied to the petitioner. Respondent shall forward to the petitioner within one month from today, a statement showing the calculation of the various benefits due to the petitioner and on the basis of which the amount has been disbursed to him. If the petitioner has any grievance regarding non receipt of any benefit which he affirms as due to him, then he is entitled to take up that matter before the authorities concerned and pursue further steps, if so necessary. Subject to the above, Contempt of Court case is closed. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs