IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38527 of 2009 1. BALIRAM RAI S/O LATE DEOLAL RAI VILL - KHORIPAKAR GOBIND, P.S. - AMNOUR, DISTT. - SARAN Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 1.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioner brother-in- law in a Police case under Sections 498A, 498, 34, 341 and 324 of the Penal Code is that the husband/brother of the petitioner filed a divorce case whereafter the allegations have been made. The petitioner is alleged to have assaulted with a knife causing injuries on the right fore arm of the informant. This Court is not persuaded to grant him the privilege of anticipatory bail. The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner is required to be considered on its own merits, keeping in mind that there was no allegation of any serious assault on a vital part of the body, without being prejudiced by the present order. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)