IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 15441 of 2010 Date of Decision: 30.8.2010. Jagdish Sharma --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Vijay Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. R.D. Sharma, D.A.G., Haryana and Mr. Jashanpreet Singh, Advocate present in the Court on behalf of Mr. Ajay Nara, Advocate have been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents no.1 & 2 to 4. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. Father of the petitioner was owner of land as mentioned in para 2 of the writ petition. This land was acquired in the year 1990 for Sector 29, Gurgaon. Father of the petitioner expired on 4.5.1999. The petitioner made a representation to respondent no.3 for allotment of plot under the oustees' policy. The only prayer made in the petition is for a direction to the respondents to decide the representations (Annexures P-2 & P-3) of the petitioner. CWP. No. 15441 of 2010 -2- In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.3 to take decision on the representations made by the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said respondent. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 30.8.2010. lucky