IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH AUGUST 2011 / 19TH SRAVANA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 520 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.23229/2007 Dated 14/10/2009 .................... PETITIONER: --------------- SIBI.K.I, AGED 43, S/O.K.J.IYPE, KARUNAKAL HOUSE, 28/1947A, CHILAVANNOOR, KADAVANTHRA P.O., ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.BENOY THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. JAMES VARGHESE, AGED ABOUT 54, S/O.VARGHESE, WORKING AS SECRETARY GENERAL EDUCATION, SECRETRIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. * { 2. C.P.CHITHRA, AGED ABOUT 55, } FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, { DIRECTOR, HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, } DIRECTORATE OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, { HOUSING BOARD BUILDING,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. } { 3. ANILKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 50, } FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, { REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, OFFICE OF THE RDD, EDAPPALLY, ERNAKULAM.} SUBSTITUTED R2. DR.V.N.SUNANTHAKUMARI, AGED ABOUT 50, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DIRECTOR, HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATIN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R3. VALSA VARKEY, AGED 54, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, RDD, ERNAKULAM. ARE SUBSTITUTED AS R2 AND R3 VIDE ORDER DATED 7.4.11 IN IA.241/11) BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.RANI DIOTHIMA THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN COC.520/10 ANNEXURE 1: COPYOF JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C)No.23229/07 DT.14.10.09. ANNEXURE -2: COPY OF GO(RT)NO.6/10/G.E. DT.1.1.10. ANNEXURE-3: COPY OF PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT DT.4.2.10. RESPONDENTS' EXTS: ANNEXURE R3(A): COPY OF ORDER NO.A2/9803/RDDE/10 DT.2.8.10. TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------------- Contempt Case(C)No.520 Of 2010 -------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 10th DAY OF AUGUST, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner alleges disobedience of the directions in Annexure I judgment. In the affidavit filed by the respondent dated 25.7.11, in paragraph No.4 it is stated that the deponent has passed orders sanctioning fixation of pay with effect from 1.7.2004 upto 4.12.2007, the date of resignation and Annexure R3(A) is the order passed by the authorities concerned. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the same will satisfy the requirements of the petitioner. In that view of the matter, as the directions have been complied with, the Contempt of Court Case is closed. Sd/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn