1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4193 OF 2010 (Dineshkumar M. Lotiya vs. Chandrakant M. Lotiya) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. OCTOBER 04, 2010. Heard Mrs. Deshpande, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Deshpande, learned counsel for the respondent. The application for amendment filed by the petitioner – defendant has been rejected by the trial Court after noting that it was not moved at the earliest possible opportunity. The learned counsel for the petitioner has tried to demonstrate to this Court that as there were chances of amicable settlement, the inspection through valuer was not done. When the efforts failed, the report was obtained and that report has been allowed to be filed on record. However, consequential amendment to incorporate its impact has been rejected. The learned counsel for the respondent has pointed out that the written statement was filed much earlier and thereafter issues were framed. The affidavit was also filed on record and then the petitioner – defendant sought for referring the matter to ADRC. 2 I have perused the impugned order. All relevant aspects are looked into by the trial Court and I do not find any jurisdictional error. Hence, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter in this jurisdiction at this stage. With liberty to the petitioner to challenge said order after final adjudication, if occasion therefor arises, present petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.