IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS TUESDAY, THE 23RD MARCH 2010 / 2ND CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 9249 of 2010(E) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- P.G.SREEKUMARI AMMA, AGED 45, W/O.BALAN PILLAI, PANANGATTU HOUSE, KRRA-NO.4, KAIRALI ROAD, EROOR SOUTH, TRIPPUNITHURA. BY ADV. SRI.K.R.VINOD RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HILL PALACE POLICE STATION, TRIPPUNITHURA. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HILL PALACE POLICE STATION, TRIPPUNITHURA. 3. NAZEER, S/O.NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 48, NESSI GARDENS, KRRA NO.3, KAIRALI ROAD, EROOR SOUTH, TRIPPUNITHURA. GP, SRI P N SUKUMARAN FOR R1 & R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 9249 of 2010 E - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 23rd day of March, 2010 JUDGMENT Joseph, J. The petitioner has approached this Court for a direction to respondents 1 and 2 not to harass the petitioner and her family in any manner, especially by exerting threat on her about the false implication in immoral traffic offences. 2. Briefly the case of the petitioner is as follows. Petitioner is residing with her husband and two children. She is working as Insurance Advisor of ICICI Bank and her husband is working as Technician in Cochin Shipyard. Her daughter is a Lecturer in an Engineering College and her son is studying in 11th standard. The third respondent is residing on the opposite side of the house of the petitioner. There were disputes between them. On 14.3.2010, the first respondent, along with police constables, trespassed into the house of the petitioner and W.P.(C).No. 9249 of 2010 2 conducted some sort of search on the allegation that they got information from the third respondent that some kind of immoral activities are carried on there. It is stated that the police detained the petitioner, her daughter and her son and later they were released stating that they acted upon the information conveyed by the third respondent. 3. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that on the information received and on suspicion the police had gone to the house of the petitioner and searched the premises. He would submit that there will be no further harassment to the petitioner. 4. We record the said submission and close this Writ Petition. We also make it clear that it will be open to the petitioner to file her complaint against the police officers in any other forum. (K. M. JOSEPH) Judge (M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS) Judge tm