THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR CONTEMPT CASE NO.1596 OF 2009 7TH October, 2010. Between: M.BALAIAH (DIED) AND OTHERS .. PETITIONERS AND SRI.KISHORE, STATE OF A.P, REP. BY SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE & COOPERATION (MARKETING-II) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD AND OTHERS .. RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR CONTEMPT CASE NO.1596 OF 2009 O R D E R: (PER THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU) This Contempt Case has consumed our time for days together. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners on several occasions whose endeavour was to persuade us for a direction to delete clause (3) of the draft sale deed which may be noticed; “ The Vendee (purchaser) should not resale or give sub-lease to other persons without the permission of the Commissioner and Committee Resolution” We have been repeatedly expressing our inability to concede to the request for the simple reason that it would amount to re-writing of the basic order which is beyond the jurisdiction of court in a contempt, but unfortunately the learned counsel for the petitioners did not appreciate the limitations law has imposed upon us and in his wisdom he chose to engage a senior Advocate. We have heard him today. His effort too was in the same direction, however ultimately after arguing at some length he chose to restrict his prayer to command the respondents to implement the judgment of the learned single Judge dated 14-07-2006 passed in Writ Petition No.7571 of 2003 in its letter and spirit as it is, to which course of action the learned counsel for the other side is also in agreement. As a matter of fact that can be the only direction which can be passed. Accordingly, the Contempt Case along with miscellaneous applications is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to implement the judgment of the learned single Judge as indicated above. Having regard to the allegation of failure of the petitioners in discharge of their obligation cast upon them by the judgment, we deem it proper to direct that time of one month granted by the learned single Judge shall commence from today. Needless to say that in case petitioners herein do not choose to present themselves before the authorities with the draft sale deed within the stipulated period, it shall be at their own risk and peril. Disposed of. (VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR,J) (NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, CJ) 7TH October, 2010. Nagesh babu THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR CONTEMPT CASE NO.1596 OF 2009 O R D E R: (PER THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU) 7TH October, 2010.