IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 18TH BHADRA 1931 WP(C).No. 25517 of 2009(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- YAJITH, S/O.YASHPAL, KOTTUKKAL HOUSE, MULLASSERY P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.JOY RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. CHIEF WELFARE FUND INSPECTOR, KERALA ABKARI WORKER'S WELFARE FUND BOARD, HEAD OFFICE, POWER HOUSE ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 23. 2. WELFARE FUND INSPECTOR, KERALA ABKARI WORKER'S WELFARE FUND BOARD, DISTRICT OFFICE, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE KERALA STATE BEVERAGES (M&M) CORPORATION LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SASTHAKRIPA OFFICE COMPLEX, SASTHAMANGALAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI. M.K. CHANDRAMOHAN DAS, SRI. ELVIN PETER, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 25517 of 2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 9th September, 2009. J U D G M E N T The petitioner claims to be dependent of a deceased abkari worker. He submits that as per Ext. P5 Government Order, 25% of the daily wage employment vacancies in the 3rd respondent-Company are reserved to be filled up by dependent sons of abkari workers. The petitioner submitted an application before respondents 1 and 2 for consideration of his case also for employment as per Ext. P5 Government Order. The petitioner alleges that a list has been prepared of eligible dependents of abkari workers for such employment in which the petitioner's name has been excluded. In the above circumstances , the petitioner has filed Ext. P8 representation before the 1st respondent. The petitioner seeks a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P8. 2. I have heard the learned standing counsel for respondents 1 and 2 as also the learned standing counsel for the 3rd respondent. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P8 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.