:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION JUDGES JUDGES JUDGES ORDER NO. 320 OF 2008 ORDER NO. 320 OF 2008 ORDER NO. 320 OF 2008 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 2137 OF 1995 NO. 2137 OF 1995 NO. 2137 OF 1995 Vinodkumar Ramnivas Saboo & Anr. ...Plaintiffs. V/s. Pala Devchand Odhavji. ... Defendant. Mr. Girish Desai i/b. Vinod Mistry & Co. for the Plaintiffs. Ms. Rohini Dandekar i/b. Berarwala & Co. for the Defendant. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. 26TH 26TH 26TH NOVEMBER 2008. NOVEMBER 2008. NOVEMBER 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . When this Judges Order was moved by the Plaintiffs, the Defendant is appearing because the matter is listed on Board. The Defendant is yet to file his affidavit of documents in the Suit. The learned Advocate appearing for the Defendant states that when the Defendant will file his affidavit of documents, he will produce the records, proceedings and orders so also the Judgment in Case No.CC/II/227/1993 filed in the Co-operative Court at Mumbai. 2. In the light of this statement made by the Defendant’s Advocate, there is no necessity of passing any orders on the request made by the Plaintiffs. Needless to :2: state that the Plaintiffs are at liberty to make an application seeking identical relief in case these documents are not produced. 3. The Judges Order is disposed of with liberty as prayed. (S.C. (S.C. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.)