HIGH C$3§T OF bHQATTESGAkH: BiLasPUR V Writ FetHtion gcr) No. 20 "of 20G? 1 x (Writ Petiticn under Article 228 of the Constitution of India.) $3: Hoa’me Mr. Satish K. Agnihom, J. Present: Shri AN, Bhakte, sounsei forthe petitioners; Shr? $umesh Bajaj, Government Advocate for the State. ORDER i (eassed on 14‘“ November,2007) Learned counseWappearing for the petitioners submits that son of the £ petitioner No.1 and husband of the petitioner No.2 nameiy Sum! Kumar Agrawa! Was assaulted on 30—5-2006} which resuiteo into his death. The petitioners have iodged met information report with the Police Station, but the Police authoritieshave not taken any steps tili date to apprehend the accused persons 2) On the other hand learned counsel appearing for the State suomtts that the petitioners have not mentioned any name in their statement recorded under " Peiitioners 1) Ramkaran Aqrawai, aaed about 55 years 43m 5f Shri §eechha Ram Aarawaij ressdent uf Ambtkapur Road PatthaigEcn Tah Distnot Patthaigaon Jacnpurkrm 2) Smt Lahta Ba: aged about 34 years Wmaw or Late Sun!‘ Kumar Agrawal dowesttc wue resident c‘ Ambikapu: Rcad Pathaigacr‘ TahsH Patha’gacn Dxsw Jashpur(CG\ Versus Regpondents 1 State .ef Chhattisgarh, :hrough Secretary, Department of Home v Affaira Da'u‘ Kawam Singh Bhawan’, Raipm' (CG) 2‘ The Dérector General 0f Police, Police Head Quarter — Raipur, State of Chhattiscarh 3‘ Supermtehdentof Pence Das‘i Jashpur (CG) ‘4. Station Hausa Officer, Poiice Station — cé Pattha!gaen, Distt. Jashpur (CG) Sécticn 151 of the Ccde of CrEminai Procedurjé‘ ThePaiice authorities are stm 'irhvestigaténg ‘ \ the matter and thereafter appropkiate action wiil be taken agama ‘ % 1 ‘ti‘i‘e accused persons There is no reason to disbelieve the State authorities. 3E:ven otherwise, if the petitioners have stiii sirome grievance, they may take iréeoourse to the provisions of law under the Cc§de of Criminai Procedure, 1973 Vméherein, it is cieariy provided that in the event :of faiture on the part of the .5oiice authorities, the aggrieved persons may approach the Judiciai Magistrate for taking action against the accused pereons. 3) in View of the foregoing, this petition is disposed of with the iiberty as , _ sd/e, stated above reserved to the petitioners. ‘ atish K. Agnihotri _ i i s