IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 4th day of September, 2006 First Bail Application No. 692 of 2006 Criminal Side Akshay Kumar S/o Jaipal Singh R/o Tejjupur, P.S. Bhagwanpur District Haridwar .........Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand .........Opposite Party ________________________________________________________ Arising out of Crime No. 81 of 2006 Under Sections: 25/27 Arms Act. P.S. Bhagwanpur District: Haridwar. ________________________________________________________ Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. This is bail application, moved by applicant-Akshay Kumar, who is in jail in connection with crime No. 81 of 2006 under Section 25/27 or Arms Act. Heard Shri B.B. Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. It is argued on behalf of applicant that co-accused Trilok Kumar, has already been released on bail. Two country made pistols from each of the accused, are said to have been recovered including from the accused, who has already been enlarged on bail by the trial court. This court wanted to see the criminal history history of the applicant. A counter affidavits has been filed on behalf of the State but no criminal history has been shown to the court. The Investigating Officer, who was directed to be present today is also not present. In the circumstances, the applicant deserves bail. Let the applicant be released on bail on executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount to the satisfaction of Ist Civil Judge (Junior Div.)/Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee. (Prafull C. Pant, J.) Dt. 04.09.2006 ____________ S