COCP No.2373 of 2011 (O & M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 30.11.2011 (i) COCP No.2373 of 2011 (O & M) Ram Chand and others .... Petitioners Versus Bir Singh (HCS), Estate Officer, HUDA ....Respondent (ii) COCP No.2374 of 2011 (O & M) Jai Ram and others .... Petitioners Versus Bir Singh (HCS), Estate Officer, HUDA ....Respondent (iii) COCP No.2375 of 2011 (O & M) Jagbir Kaur and another .... Petitioners Versus Bir Singh (HCS), Estate Officer, HUDA ....Respondent (iv) COCP No.2376 of 2011 (O & M) Kukku Devi and another .... Petitioners Versus Bir Singh (HCS), Estate Officer, HUDA ....Respondent COCP No.2373 of 2011 (O & M) ::2:: (v) COCP No.2377 of 2011 (O & M) Vijay Malik and others .... Petitioners Versus Bir Singh (HCS), Estate Officer, HUDA ....Respondent (vi) COCP No.2378 of 2011 (O & M) Satish Kumar and others .... Petitioners Versus Bir Singh (HCS), Estate Officer, HUDA ....Respondent (vii) COCP No.2379 of 2011 (O & M) Murti Devi .... Petitioner Versus Bir Singh (HCS), Estate Officer, HUDA ....Respondent (viii) COCP No.2380 of 2011 (O & M) Ranjit Singh .... Petitioner Versus Bir Singh (HCS), Estate Officer, HUDA ....Respondent COCP No.2373 of 2011 (O & M) ::3:: (ix) COCP No.2381 of 2011 (O & M) Jai Ram .... Petitioner Versus Bir Singh (HCS), Estate Officer, HUDA ....Respondent (x) COCP No.2382 of 2011 (O & M) Vijay Pal and others .... Petitioners Versus Bir Singh (HCS), Estate Officer, HUDA ....Respondent (xi) COCP No.2383 of 2011 (O & M) Kishan Singh .... Petitioner Versus Bir Singh (HCS), Estate Officer, HUDA ....Respondent (xii) COCP No.2384 of 2011 (O & M) Rajbir Singh and others .... Petitioners Versus Bir Singh (HCS), Estate Officer, HUDA ....Respondent COCP No.2373 of 2011 (O & M) ::4:: (xiii) COCP No.2385 of 2011 (O & M) Raj Kumar Arora and others .... Petitioners Versus Bir Singh (HCS), Estate Officer, HUDA ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. Surinder Dagar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Raman Gaur, Advocate, for the respondent. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.: (Oral) This order shall disposed of a bunch of 13 cases bearing COCP Nos.2373, 2374, 2375, 2376, 2377, 2378, 2379, 2380, 2381, 2382, 2383, 2384 and 2385 of 2011 as common violations are involved in these cases. For brevity, the facts are being taken from COCP No.2373 of 2011, which are given hereunder:- The grievance of the petitioners, in this petition, is that the respondent had violated order dated 06.10.2010 passed by this Court in RFA No.3841 of 2001 whereby directions were issued to the respondent to disburse the compensation after seeking the account numbers of the petitioners and depositing the same therein. Learned counsel for the respondent states that the amount has been received by the respondent and shall be deposited in the accounts of the petitioners within a week. In view of the above, the present petitions are rendered infructuous and the same are disposed of as such. COCP No.2373 of 2011 (O & M) ::5:: However, in case, the petitioners find that insufficient claim has been granted, they shall be entitled to take recourse to the legal remedies available to them, in accordance with law. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE November 30, 2011 sukhpreet