1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9037 OF 2007 Balasaheb Piraji Jadhav & Ors. .. Petitioners Versus Nivas Eknath Nikam & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.G.S.Godbole with A.S.Tajane for petitioners Ms.V.S.Mhaispurkar, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 8 and 9 CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 10th January 2008 P.C. . Ms.Mhaispurkar, learned A.G.P. appearing for respondent Nos.8 and 9 states that the Revisional Authority was not prohibited from hearing the revision application pending before it and disposing of the same finally. Accordingly, the revisional authority has passed an order on 9th January 2008 allowing the revision application preferred before it 2 partially and remitting the matter back to Tahsildar for decision in accordance with Mamlatdar Courts Act. In other words, the Tahsildar has to re-hear the matter in accordance with law. 2. Mr. Tajne appearing in support of this petition states that he has no instructions. However, a copy of the operative order being produced by Ms.Mhaispurkar from the custody of the authorised officer, there is no reason to disbelieve her and the S.D.O., Karad Division, Karad. In such circumstances, nothing survives in this petition and the same is disposed of accordingly. 3. Needless to state that Tahsildar, Karad will have to abide by revisional order and there is no necessity to go into rival contentions as that would prejudice the case of parties before Tahsildar, Karad. 3 4. Mr.Warunjikar appearing for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 at this stage states that several false and misleading statements have been made in the petition and, therefore, leave be granted to take out appropriate proceedings against the petitioners and to bring to this Court’s notice the same. Needless to state that Mr.Warunjikar is at liberty to adopt such proceedings as are permissible in law. 5. Considering the nature of controversy, the Tahsildar, Karad to endeavour and dispose of the enquiry pending before him within a period of two months from the date of decision. A copy of the operative part of the revisional order is placed on record and marked "X" for identification. Petition disposed of accordingly. 4 (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)