1 WP9873/10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9873 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra ...Petitioners v/s Avinash Laxman Patil and anr. ...Respondents Mr A.B. Vagyani, AGP for Petitioners. Mr Pratap Patil for Respondent No.1. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND K.K. TATED JJ. DATE : 17TH JANUARY 2011. 2 WP9873/10 P.C. :- 1] Heard. Perused the record. Admittedly, the respondent No.1 was being transferred within a period of three years because there were complaints against him. We have perused the report that was submitted by the Executive Engineer, who was appointed to enquire into the complaints, which shows that there was no substance in the complaints. In our opinion, therefore, the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal has rightly refused to interfere with the transfer order. The petition is misconceived. It is rejected. Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Sheristedar / Private Secretary of this Court. Certified copy expedited. ( JUSTICE D.K. DESHMUKH ) ( JUSTICE K.K. TATED )