1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.W. NO.3261 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2991 OF 2002. (MANOHAR KESHAORAO BURE & OTH...VS..M.S.E.B.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. B.M.Khan, Advocate for Petitioners. Mrs. U.A. Patil, Advocate for Respondent. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : MARCH 03, 2011. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. By this civil application the applicant seeks a direction to the respondent to withdraw the letter dated 02.08.2010 directing the petitioner to do the work of ‘Lineman’ and instead direct the respondent to permit the petitioner to work as ‘Lower Division Clerk’. The learned counsel for the petitioner relied on the order passed by this Court on 22.08.2002 granting status quo as regards the nature of work till then. It is the case of the applicant that the applicant/ petitioner No.1 was doing the work of Lower Division Clerk, whereas, the Industrial Court has found that the petitioner was not doing the work of Lower Division Clerk at all. It is necessary to see the subsequent order passed by this Court on 09.09.2002, wherein it is observed by this Court that the respondent M.S.E.B. shall, as far as possible, allow the petitioners to do the work which they are presently doing. 2 The respondent has stated in its reply that there is no work available for the Lower Division Clerk and in such circumstances, it is not possible to permit the petitioner to do the work of Lower Division Clerk by withdrawing the communication dated 02.08.2010. The petitioner does not have a right to work as the Lower Division Clerk during the pendency of this writ petition as this Court has clearly observed that the Maharashtra State Electricity Board shall, as far as possible, allow the petitioner to do the work which he was presently doing. In any case, there is a dispute whether the petitioner was working as Lower Division Clerk or not and there is a finding of the Industrial Court that the petitioner did not perform the duties of the Lower Division Clerk. In such circumstances, the direction as sought by the applicant/ petitioner No.1 in this application, cannot be granted. The Civil Application is, therefore, disposed of. JUDGE RR..