IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC NO.1751 OF 2009 RAMESH KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA, SON OF LATE BANESH PD. SINHA, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA BRAHAMANI GHAT, POLICE STATION CIVIL LINES, DISTRICT GAYA …………………………………………..PETITIONER VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SHRI RAI MADAN KISHORE, THE COMMISSIONER, WATER BOARD – CUM- MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, GAYA 3. SHRI AHSOK KUMAR SINGH, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER BOARD, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, GAYA 4. SHRI TRILOKI NATH SHARMA, THE ACCOUNTS OFFICER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, GAYA ……………………………………………………………………………..RESPONDENTS ********** 7 04/08/2010 Counsel for the Corporation was asked to provide calculation on the basis of which payment of retiral benefits were to be paid to the petitioner. The breakage has been filed by way of an affidavit. The petitioner objects to almost each and every amount which has been calculated by the Corporation. In the circumstances, this Court cannot adjudicate with respect to the correctness of the amount which has to be paid. The petitioner should accept the amount as mentioned in Annexure-A and file his objections with respect to the amount which is due to him before the Corporation. The Corporation will consider it and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. It may be pointed out that a cheque bearing no. BB 355541 dated 03.11.2009 was offered by the Counsel 2 for the Corporation to the Counsel for the petitioner with respect to a sum of Rs. 56,000/- & odd and since the Counsel for the petitioner refused to accept the cheque, it has been returned to the Corporation. The petitioner would be at liberty to approach the Municipal Commissioner who will hand over the cheque in question or renew the cheque and then hand it over to the petitioner, if need be. This contempt application is thus disposed of. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )