1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twentieth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.16593 of 2011 SAHUBAR SADIQ ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUPPATHUR TALUK SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. (CR.NO.246 OF 2011) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.JEGADEESWARAN Advocate For Respondent : MR. R.RAMACHANDRAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 420 and 409 of IPC in Crime NO.246 of 2011 and seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case on the allegation that the petitioner being the Headmaster of a School said to have received a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- from the de-facto complainant for regularising his job. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner has been implicated in the case on the allegation that he has received a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- from the de-facto complainant. 4.It is seen that the petitioner is working as Headmaster of a School. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that the entire allegations are borne out by records and documents, this Court is of the considered view that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required, this Court is constrained to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruppathur, Sivagangai District on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said learned Magistrate or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police every day at 5.30 p.m., for a period of four weeks and thereafter, he shall be available for interrogation as and when required. sd/- 20/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUPPATHUR, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SIVAGANGAI 3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUPPATHUR TALUK, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. R.JEGADEESWARAN Advocate SR.No.44674 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16593 of 2011 Date :20/12/2011 TR : 22.12.2011: 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/