1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.2423 OF 2009 Hanishali Sherali Hashrni @ Papa, .. Applicant Vs State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Ms. Anjali Patil, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste, APP, for the Respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 03/07/2009 PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the respondent. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.43 of 2009 of Nehrunagar Police Station. The said crime has been registered against the applicant and two others for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 363, 342, 376(2)(g), 377 read with 34 of IPC. 3. I perused the statement of the prosecutrix recorded on 5.2.2009, so also the supplementary statement recorded on T 2 13.2.2009. The prosecutrix has stated in detail as to how she was kidnapped by the applicant and one lady Afroz and how rape was committed on her by the accused persons. The other accused persons were not known to the prosecutrix. However, she has given detailed descriptions of those persons in the statement. The medical evidence supports the allegations made in the FIR. The prosecutrix has attributed specific role to the applicant. Having considered the nature of allegations against the applicant, I am not inclined to enlarge him on bail. Hence, the application is rejected. While passing this order I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. Application is disposed of. (D. B. Bhosale, J.) 3