IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11485 of 2007 RASHIDA BANO & ORS Versus THE CHAIRMAN, B.P.S.C. & ORS WITH CWJC No.12134 of 2007 MADHVI KUMARI & ORS Versus THE BIHAR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS For the Petitioners : M/S Ajay Kumar-I, R.K. Sinha-2, Satyendra Prasad, Advocates. For the B.P.S.C. : Advocate General, Ashok Kumar Sinha, Shyam Sunder Pandey, Advocates. ----------- 17. 10.09.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel for the Bihar Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as “the Commission”). 2. Petitioners of both the writ applications had appeared in the examination conducted by the Commission for the post of Child Development Project Officer in response to advertisement No.34 of 2005, Annexure-1. They have filed these applications praying inter alia to direct the Commission to re-evaluate their answer sheets as also the answer sheets of the other candidates whose Roll Numbers have been indicated in the two writ applications. 3. Counsel for the Commission has informed this Court that there is no provision for re-evaluation of the answer sheets of the examinees. In this connection order of this Court dated 19.7.2008 passed in L.P.A. No. 507 of 2008 has also been produced whereunder the - 2 - prayer of the appellant of the said case for re-evaluation was rejected observing that there is no provision for re- evaluation of the answer sheets of the examinees who have appeared in the examination conducted by the Commission. In the circumstances, I do not find any merit in the two writ application, which are, accordingly dismissed. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)