O 4g ~‘aa/Z/ In the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur WP(C)- gzza /2010 Petitioner b ”aw W£ / Ajay Singh QO Yrs. S/o Late i‘igi: \ x" Satwant Singh Gill, Shop # 52, Hira Arcade Complx., New Bus Stand Pandri, Raipur Versus . State Transport Authority, CG — Raipur / 2. Transport Commissioner, CG — Raipur Petition Under Art. 226 ( 227 of the Constitution of India Respondents wfié ashok my“ »_ "u (v0 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N031 13 OF 2010 PETITIONER Ajay Singh Versus RESPONDENTS State Transport Authority, C.G., Raipur & Another (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of india) Singie Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. ~r“, N Present :— Shri Anumesh Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the ‘State/ respondents. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 13‘ day of July, 2010) 1. The grievance ofthe petitioner is that on 15.03.2010 (Annexure P-1), the petitioner moved an application before the respondents for grant of permanent permit on the route Baiaudabazaar to Nagpur. However, till date the same has not been decided by the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the said application expeditiously. 3. Learned counsel for the State submits that application of the petitioner shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law and on its own merits, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. In view of foregoing, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the application dated 15.03.2010 (Annexure P/1) filed by the petitioner Within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid direction/ observation, this petition stands finally disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. A'gnihotri Judge \