??'.. f f., .^0 >RS®!1 .U:^.^T s^s^:----"" .,\-^'"" ..-•••" KFS-fcK'"J -s^1--^ ^:.'p^^'.-^ oss &! IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, AT BILASPUR PETITIONER W.PS^Q.t^200t Ku. Tara Mandal D/o Shri Maharaj aged about 42 years, working as A.N.M. R/o C/o Sub Health Centre Ahilda, Primary Health Centre Lavan, Distf. Raipur (C.G.) Versus Respondents ^-1. State of C.G. Through Secretary Health Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) / 2. Chief Medical SE Health Officer Raipur office of Chief Medical & Health Officr Talibandh Raipur (C.G.) . ,3. Block Medical Officer, Lavan, Primary Health Centre Lavan, District- Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA /' XI-HC-78 RIWtl SbHlcb 3^^TP(1?Pf, ®T(IWIS,IslMIHy ^^. .U5-. .1:;-.^-.s.?®^200^ 3TI^?TT?g? (<^gg^8T) sn^AFqirl^iN; traT3-*STaiitNi ^tTwgfera'n^T +i-'iFci'ifl-< tii4riT^'fe^<(Siwi<. ^TSl^iTan^TT ^-' ques^ioned 18-8-2006 Miss Sunita Jtrin, counsei fo| Mr. Satish Supta, Deputy 64vt advance copy. Heard both the counse!. By the instant u»ritpetition] of India, the petitioner has (Annexure P-2), whereby she has Ahilda (Lavan) to Community Healftf ©rievonceof the petitioner Nurse Midwife, she is a low salary months she has been transferred. In the circumstances, learn^d order to brin9 this anomaly to th< may be olbwed to make a detail4! respondent No.l be directed to <(< appearing for the State/respondsn| Having heard learned couns^l and cir-cumstances of the case andl the ease, the request made by lea( and reasonable. Therefore, the representation raisin9 ol! her grie^ ond its annexures to respondenl respondent No.l is directed to d< the petitioner. 't. Advocate for the State/respondents, on lunder Article 226/227 of the Constitution her transfer order dated 7-7-2006 t»eentransferred from Sub Health Centre, Centre, Bilai9arh. \s thct the petitioner is workin9 as Auxiliary paid employee and within a period of ei9ht counsel for the petitioner submits that in notice of respondent No.l, the petitioner ^d representation to respondent No.l and fecide the same, to which learned counsel i|'s hos no objection. for the parties, having regard to the facts without expressing any opinion on merit of •ned counsel for the petitioner is just, fair petitioner is allowed to make a detailed ^onces annexin9 a copy of the writ petition No.l within ten days from today and ^cide the representation within one month P.T.O. ~RS '^ XI-HC-78 *11*IMI 8i^|ch 3^T-?rraRW, ®Tny'is,{aifiiuy ..^r:.^.^^ 2oo^ 3<t^l 4^* (yil^q^ff) aw^r^TR-ii* TOTS'^TsbKi* Soma ?TaRKHf?tT3n^T •^ from the date of its receipt of\ petitioner, in an objsctive manner,| Tiil the representation of the peti-( 7"' July, 2006 (Annexure P-2), in r^ With the directions aforesaild Consequently, M.(W.)P.No.3^! Parties are entitted for certl cbiitt'i'fli *)iiifiTffto^i,fr<igi: ^sil^Tsn^n' ter considerin9 the points raised by the on its own merits, in accordance with law. lioner is deeided, the impigned order dffted spect of the petitioner shall remain stayed. I, the petition stands disposed of. 187/2006 also stands disposed of. fied copy of this order. .Sd/- ' L.C.Bhadoo Judge .^ P.T.O. »!' y