1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.999 of 2011. 1.Krishna Murari Pd. Singh son of Late Jagarnath Prasad Singh, Resident of Sector 6H/57, Bahadurpur Housing Colony, Bhoot Nath Road, P.S. Agamkuan, District Patna. 2.Nand Kishore Tiwary son of Late Kuldip Tiwary, Resident of Sector 6H/64. Bahadurpur Housing Colony, Bhoot Nath Road, P.S. Agamkuan, District Patna. 3.Prithivi Narain Yadav son of Late Ram Dahin Yadav Prasad Resident of Sector 6H/15, Bahadurpur Housing Colony, Bhoot Nath Road, P.S. Agamkuan, District Patna. 4.Shiv Shankar Rai son of Late Rajdhani Rai Resident of Sector 6H/18, Bahadurpur Housing Colony, Bhoot Nath Road, P.S.Agamkuan, District Patna. 5.Krishna Deo Choudhary son of Late Pulkit Choudhary Resident of Sector 6H/24, Bahadurpur Housing Colony, Bhoot Nath Road, P.S. Agamkuan, District Patna. 6.Madhurendra Prasad Verma son of Late Raj Mangal Prasad Resident of Sector 6H/26, Bahadurpur Housing Colony, Bhoot Nath Road, P.S. Agamkuan, District Patna. 7.Atul Kumar Ghosh son of Late Mahendra Nath Ghosh Resident of Sector 6H/30, Bahadurpur Housing Colony, Bhoot Nath Road, P.S. Agamkuan, District Patna. 8.Girija Shankar Singh son of Late Tribhuwan Narain Singh Resident of Sector 6H/32, Bahadurpur Housing Colony, Bhoot Nath Road, P.S. Agamkuan, District Patna. ………………….Petitioners. Versus 1.The State Of Bihar. 2.Mr. Girish Shankar, Principal Secretary Urban Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.Mr. Anupam Kumar Suman, the Managing Director, Bihar State Housing Board, Patna. ……………… Opp.Party. For the petitioners : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Adv. For the Board : Mr. R.S.Pradhan, Sr.Adv. ---------------------------------- 5 15.11.2011 Pursuant to our order dated 21st October 2011, Mr. Anupam Kumar Suman, the Managing Director, Bihar State Housing Board is personally present and a show cause filed to-day contains an order of the Board dated 11th November 2 2011 whereby in compliance of the order of the writ court, action has been taken against 17 allottees under various provisions of the agreement which empowered the Board to cancel the allotment of plots in the event no construction activity is undertaken within specified period. In view of the aforesaid show cause, this contempt application is finally disposed of. The personal appearance of the Managing Director is dispensed with. It goes without saying that the petitioner who has preferred the writ petition by way of PIL will always be at liberty to approach this Court for a good cause. Jay/ (Shiva Kirti Singh,J) (Shivaji Pandey, J)