IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUOICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) » WRTT PETITION (S) N0. '25-S4- pp 2005 PETITIONER ...•".'J ^^^J' ...?^>"" >^^^ "^-"" RESPONDENTS : 1. Panne Lal Sonwani, Son of Shri Bansudhari, aged about 30 ye^rs, Occupation-Service, Presently working as Pgtwari, Halka N0. 16,R I Circle Darima Ambikapur , Tahsil - Afpbikapur, District Surguja (C.G.)^ VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secrefcary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). <^ e\ e"'"\\ 2. The Commissioner, (Land Records), Raipur (C.G.). 3. The Coflector, District Surguja, " Ambikapur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE226/227 OF THE CONSTn-UTION OF INDIA 1 XI-HC-78 ^1*1^1 9i»l|cb 3:sg'.:?rFnci4, a^u'is, (sK-iwy J^-^^^^^20^ anisr cra^? (yit^q^'iT) sn^rsCTf^TR; gS[T3TR?Tsht| BRiren: (rfsg'3'n^r 19.7.; S'nri P.P. Sahu, counsei forth| Miss Dipaii Pandey, Panei advance copy. Heard By the instant petition, the peli 7-7-2006 whereby he has been fra'tsferred Cirele Darima, District Surguja to FfafrA'ari District Surguja at his ov/n expenses) The main grisvance raised byj' petitioner. i|.awyer for the State/rsspondents, on litioner has challenged the order dated from Patoari Halka No.16, R! F?atlA'ari Halka No.72, Tehsi! Surajpur, had never requssted for his transf^ A-'s— has been transferrsd Bl LI.'L! (jiuj.uiit on Ishowins that the transfer has been Learned counsei for the petitit: |be allowed to make a representatif Idirected to decide the same, to whicfl |no objection. Having heard learned couns^l Ifacts and cireumstances of the Ipetitioner that the petitioner never r| Ihas b'een shov/n to be transferred a| |any opinion on the merits.of the cas4 |for the petitioner is just, fair and re< latiowed to make a detaiied |to respondent No.1 raislng ai! his g| tfrom today and in turn, respondent i^| ]the petitioner within a period of 30 represen^atson cbi'iifd'ifl^ tii^dTfffs^KRi^H ^sri^irsT^r the petitioner In this petition is that he VVithout his request the petitioner riacc of pasting on his own expenses m]ade on his request.. jtit>ner submitted that the petitioner may to the respondent No.1 and he be learned counsel for respondents has for the parties, having regard to the ;, as per the aiiegations of the iquested for his transfer whereas, he his request, and without expressing , the prayer made by iearned counsel isonable. Therefore, the petltioner is ation aiong with a copy of this petition •ievances within a period of 10 days o.1 shal! decide the represeritation of days from the date of recelpt of the P.T.O. XI-HC-78 3^'^Tpn^pT, yTnyis, Rli'liuy *1iq^l Sh*1T^> TR; 200 3TT^?T4^ch (yii^q^ST) an^Tw R-ii<* (PiTsn^Taiiiti Ban/e .^/^ ^" ?RITWHfNsn^T '^'< ppropriate order, in accordance with '\..' 1 ^, not be relieved, if he'jfe^ already not representation, in an objective matiner, after considering alt the points raised by the petitioner and pass ^( iaw. Tili then, the petitioner should| relieved. With the direction aforesaid, t!(e Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.21 Parties are entitied for certifiecl <til'i|Id41-ft<IKc1l'ffte^t<,Rl-L<;K ^sri^lTBn^T petition stands disposed of. 46/2006 also stands disposed of. copy of this order. L.C. BiwdBO Judge P.T.O.