IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12144 of 2011 BHARAT SAH @ BHARAT PRASAD & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 19.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The accusation is that the complainant got the marriage fixed with the petitioner No.1. Petitioner No.2 and 3 are the parents of petitioner No.1. It is alleged that the complainant paid Rs.75,000/- cash and jewellery and other articles but ultimately for further demand of money the marriage could not be settled. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the complainant’s daughter has been married to some other place and there also the case has been lodged against the in-laws family under Section 498A of the I.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1 is posted in Sikkim, whereas, petitioner No.2 is posted in Manipur in the Government job. Considering the fact that the complainant’s daughter 2 has already married to some other place, let the petitioners namely, 1. Bharat Sah @ Bharat Prasad, 2. Ramadhar Prasad and 3. Pooja Devi @ Shakuntala Devi, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1707 of 2007, T.R. No. 3498 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make correction in the prayer portion. Ibrar/- ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)