_i= fro lN THE HIGH COUHT 0F SIKKiM OF]DEF} SHEET Bail Gyalsten Shenga Versus State of Si]dcim No. 2 of 2008 Petitioner / Appellant Pespondent Order with Signature Office Note as to action (if any) taken on Order 01. Present: Mr. Jorgay Namka and Ms. Zola Megi, Advocates for t:he Accused-Petitioner. Mr. Karma Thinlay, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State-Respondent. Heard. A perusal of the bail application shows that four bail applications in all were moved before the learned Sessions Judge, East & Nort:h at Gangtok and all of them were rejected on merit aft:er hearing. This application which is the first one before this Court: is thus the fifth one in the series of the applications made by the accused- petitioner thus far. Admittedly, there is no new development or any substantial change in the fact situation of the case ?fter the rejection of previous bail applications and till the filing of the present application. It is settled law, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in Sfafe of Maharasl.tra vs. Buddhikotal Subba Feao reported /-n AIR ]989 SC 2292 that no accused can be admitted to bail in t:he absence of any substantial change in t:he fact situation of the case aft:er re].ection of the previous bail application/s. c.c>pj Gf tL-crdev d&ded ti . Gi-c3g , s~± +4 tL-c4krfu oL ILL- S€ggL`otJ` TLc,ft c-.3 . M |ts/wJ # ¢E ,ry QL- 1,-G|' G8. apl?(eg •ialof, Dateof Order with Signatilre\, a°cfti:One(¥O:#o Ier Order taken on Order In view of the above, the present bail )I1( application is re]-ected. It is, however, submitted.by the learned Additional Public.Prosecutor that charge sheet in the case has now been filed. In view of this, the Court below is directed t:o hold day to day trial so as to dispose of the matt:er as expedi iously as possible.(Jus.eA.P.Subba) Acting Chief Justice 11-07-2008 `- _ _-_----