: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (LODGING) NO.55 OF 2004 REVIEW PETITION (LODGING) NO.55 OF 2004 REVIEW PETITION (LODGING) NO.55 OF 2004 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.2061 OF 1999 WRIT PETITION NO.2061 OF 1999 WRIT PETITION NO.2061 OF 1999 Smt.Asha Krishnaji Abhyankar ) through Smt.Anjali Dilip Abhyankar ) Constituted Attorney of the Petitioner ).. Petitioner Versus Jayesh Surji Rambhia and others ).. Respondents Mr.S.M.Oak i/b.Mr.Ambar Joshi for the Petitioner. Mr.P.M.Pradhan for Respondent Nos.1, 11, 20 and 27. Mr.Haresh Jagtiani with Curush Billimoria and Ms.Nishtha Malik for Respondent No.16. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 16TH DECEMBER 2004 DATED: 16TH DECEMBER 2004 DATED: 16TH DECEMBER 2004 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . This Review Petition has been filed contending that the Minutes of the Order had been obtained on 29th April 2003 by playing a fraud on the Court. According to the review Petitioner, the Minutes are contrary to Section 72 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Reliance is placed on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Ramchandra Ganpat Shinde and another vs. State of Maharashtra and others, (1993) (1993) (1993) 4 SCC 216 4 SCC 216 4 SCC 216 in support of the submission. There is nothing on record to indicate that the person who signed the Minutes on behalf of the Society was not so authorised on the date when the Minutes were signed nor is there any new ground made out for reviewing the order : 2 : passed earlier. Hence, Review Petition dismissed.