1` IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Second Appeal No.404/2006 Chintaman Dasram Jamaiwar vs. Baburao Shrawan Meshram and others. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : A.P. Lavande,J DATE : 17.9.2007 Heard Shri P.V.Kaore, learned counsel for the appellant/plaintiff. 2. By this appeal the appellant takes exception to the Judgment and decree dated 23.2.2006 passed by the Second Ad hoc Additional District Judge, Bhandara in Regular Civil Appeal No. 21/2005 dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant against the Judgment and decree dated 2.2.2005 passed by the Civil Judge, Jr. Dn., Mohadi in Regular Civil Suit No. 35/1998. 3. The appellant/plaintiff filed the suit for injunction against the defendants/ respondents in respect of the suit lane situated between the houses of the plaintiff and the defendants. According to the plaintiff, he was the owner and in possession of the suit lane and defendants obstructed the plaintiff from carrying out construction and putting of a slab. The trial court upon appreciation of the evidence led by the 2` parties held that the plaintiff had failed to prove the title to the suit lane. This finding was upheld by the lower appellate court. 4. Having perused the impugned Judgments passed by both the courts below I find no merit in the present appeal. The finding recorded by both the courts below that the plaintiff has failed to prove his title to the suit lane is based upon proper appreciation of the evidence on record. Hence, there is no perversity in the said finding. In any events, no substantial question of law is involved. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. Judge patle