..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1168 OF 2007 IN (C.R.NO.13 OF 2006 - Paud Police Station, Pune) Arvind Ashok Kamble. ...Applicant. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Smt.Jahanara Sarkot, Adv. i/b. Ms.R.A.Biag & S.P. Hulyalkar, Advs. for the Applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 21st April, 2007. DATED : 21st April, 2007. DATED : 21st April, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.13 of 2006 of Paud Police Station, Pune. The said case is mainly under Section 302, 120-B of IPC. 3. It is the prosecution case that the applicant along with others entered into a conspiracy to murder Mahesh Mengade. During the search of the house of the applicant, one diary ..(2).. came to be seized in which the mobile numbers of other accused persons were mentioned. Besides this, witness Mahesh Dhumal has stated that when he went to Khakar Talim at that time he heard the present applicant and one coaccused Ramesh Gadhave discussing about committing murder of Mahesh Mengade. Both of them also offered money to this witness (Mahesh Dhumal) for committing murder of Mahesh Mengade, however, this witness refused. 4. The statement of witness Mahesh Dhumal clearly shows that the present applicant is involved in the conspiracy to commit murder of Mahesh Mengade. Thus, I am not inclined to grant bail to the applicant. 5. Application is rejected. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)