1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2365 OF 2008 The State of Maharashtra. ...Applicant. Vs. Chand Gudulal Sanadi & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr. K.V. Saste, APP for the Applicant. None for the Respondents. ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & F.M. REIS, JJ. April 4, 2009. P.C. : The Learned Additional District Judge, has in his judgment dated 11th April 2008 furnished cogent reasons for the acquittal of Accused Nos.2 to 5 who are impleaded as Respondent Nos.2 to 5 to the present proceedings. Accused No.1 was, however, held guilty for the offence under Sections 302 and 364 of the Indian Penal Code. In so far as Accused Nos.2, 3, 4 and 5 are concerned, it has been noted that in the First Information Report filed on 28th December 2004 by the complainant, Vikas, who was brother of the 2 deceased, no role was ascribed to the aforesaid accused. It was in his supplementary statement lodged nearly three months thereafter that the names of Accused Nos.2 to 5 were brought in. From the reasons in the judgment of the Learned Trial Judge, it is apparent that there is no reliable evidence on record against Accused Nos.2 to 5. In the circumstances, no case has been made out for the grant of leave. The Criminal Application is accordingly dismissed. Dr.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. F.M. REIS, J.