IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11205 of 2009 DIPAK KUMAR VERMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 4.9.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner states that without any enquiry or notice to him the Circle Officer, Baikunthpur, District Gopalganj, respondent no.4 has issued basgit parcha in favour of respondent second set in respect of plot no.777, Khata no.268 measuring an area of 0.44 decimals situated in village Pipra, Circle Baikunthpur, District Gopalganj. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the impugned order was passed without notice to the petitioner and as soon as he came to learn about it that an order has been passed against him, he immediately filed a petition on 21.2.2009 before the Collector, Gopalganj, contained in Annexure-3. He further states that despite of all efforts he did not get certified copy of the impugned order passed by the D.C.L.R. However, the Collector, Gopalganj had sought a report in this respect from the Circle Officer, Baikunthpur which would be evident from Annexure-4. The petitioner is still in possession of the lands. After hearing counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the revisional authority would dispose of the petition of the petitioner dated 21.2.2009 treating the same to be one under section 21 of the Bihar Homestead Tenancy Act preferably within a period of 2 KHAN three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. However, it would be open to the petitioner to take all other points before the Collector, Gopalganj. (S.P.Singh,J)