IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2378 OF 2006 PETITION (L) NO. 2378 OF 2006 PETITION (L) NO. 2378 OF 2006 Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak ... Petitioner Aghadi V/s. The Security Guards Board for ... Respondents Greater Bombay and ors. Mr. Susheel Mahadeshwar with Ms. Ranjana Todankar for petitioner. Mr. M.S. Topkar for respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 17th October, 2006 : 17th October, 2006 : 17th October, 2006 P.C. . The counsel for the petitioner states that respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have been served but none present. However, considering controversy, petition is disposed of by issuing following directions. . The person listed in Exhibit "A" will apply for registration to respondent No. 1. Respondent No. 1 to dispose of the application according to norms within four weeks from today. In the event respondent No. 2 is not registered, the respondent No. 1 to take steps against respondent No. 2 according to law. ( 2 ) 2. With the above direction, the petition stands disposed of. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]