IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID THURSDAY, THE 3RD NOVEMBER 2011 / 12TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 28766 of 2011(U) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- V.S.SHABEEM,AMEENA MANZIL, THOLICODE, NEDUMANGAD,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695541 (EMPANELLED CONDUCTOR, KSRTC, NEDUMANGAD DEPOT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695541 BY ADVS. SRI.B.RAGUNATHAN SRI.G.S.MOHANDAS SRI.R.SRINATH SRI.VIPIN VARGHESE RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REP.BY CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRETOR, KSRTC, FORT, THIRUVANANATHAPURAM-695541 2. DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KSRTC, NEDUMANGAD DEPOT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695541 BY ADV. SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURAVATHAZHE, SC., K.S.R.T.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 28766/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF CASH RECEIPT CH.NO.19387 DATED 21/10/1993 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 28766 of 2011 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of November 2011. JUDGMENT The writ petition is filed for a direction directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 representation as expeditiously as possible. 2. Petitioner is an Empanelled Conductor in the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation, Nedumangad. The grievance of the petitioner is that he was not given sufficient duty and hence there was reduction in his salary as well. His juniors had given preference in allotment of duty. Therefore, the petitioner submitted Ext.P2 representation before the 1st respondent requesting the Corporation to ventilate the grievances set out in Ext.P2. 2. When the matter was taken up for consideration today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a direction may be issued to the 1st respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P2 at an early date. 3. In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of W.P.(C) No.28766/2011 2 with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P2 representation in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment to the 1st respondent. HARUN-UL-RASHID JUDGE al