IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 2320 of 2010 Rajdeep Kaur and others .....Petitioners VERSUS State of Punjab ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. S.S. Walia, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. A.S. Jattana, Addl.A.G, Punjab for the State. Mr. J.S. Brar, Advocate for respondent No. 2. RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioners pray for quashing of the FIR on the ground that they are distantly related to the husband of the complainant but have wrongly been summoned under Sections 406 and 498 IPC. Charges have been framed and the case is now fixed for evidence. The petitioners, if so advised, may have their remedy of revision against the order framing the charges, in case, they find that no offence is made out against them. In addition, the petitioners would be at liberty to raise all these pleas before the trial Court. The petitioners may also file an application seeking exemption from their personal appearance, which shall be considered by the trial Court in accordance with law. No case for interference otherwise is made out. Dismissed. November 28, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE