1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 125 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4615 OF 2006 01. Prabhulal Bhuralal Gavali, (Hadav), Age : 48 Years, Occu. : Business, R/o Mohammad Ali Road, Nanded, Tq. & Dist. Nanded. 02. Kishorkumar S/o Someschandra Warma, Age : 72 Years, Occu. : Business, R/o Somesh Colony, Nanded, Taluka and District Nanded. .. APPLICANTS PETITIONERS Versus 01. The State of Maharashtra, through the Collector, Nanded. 02. The Collector, Nanded. 03. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, P. T. (Minor Irrigation-1) Nanded. 04. National Airport Authority, Regional Executive Director (NAA), Bombay Airport, Bombay Region, Bombay. 05. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (through its Executive Engineer), Government of Maharashtra Undertaking, Income tax Bhavan, Bafana Road, Nanded .. RESPONDENTS 2 Shri S. B. Talekar, Advocate for the Applicants Shri V. H. Dighe, A. G. P. for the Respondents No. 1 to 3. Shri N. S. Chaudhary, Advocate for the Respondent No. 4. Shri S. S. Dande, Advocate for the Respondent No. 5. CORAM : P. V. HARDAS, AND N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 30TH JULY, 2009. ORAL ORDER [Per P. V. Hardas, J. ] : 1. This is an application by which the applicants/petitioners seek review of the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court dated 16.07.2008 rendered in writ petition No. 4615/2006 which had been filed by the present applicants. 2. Notice of this review application came to be issued to the respondents. We have heard Shri S. B. Talekar, learned counsel for the applicants and learned counsel for the respondents. Learned counsel for the applicants has urged in support of the various grounds which are urged in the review application. 3. With the assistance of the learned counsel, we have perused the findings recorded by us in our judgment which is sought to be reviewed in this application. Upon perusal, we do not notice any error apparent on the face of record warranting the exercise of the 3 jurisdiction to review our own judgment. In the light of that, application which sans merit, is therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [ P. V. HARDAS, J.] bsb/July 09