THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P.Nos.5832 & 5851 of 2010 COMMON ORDER: These two revisions arise out of different orders passed in O.S.No.94 of 2007, pending in the Court of Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ongole. Hence, they are disposed of through a common order. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred to, as arrayed in C.R.P.No.5832 of 2010. The petitioners entered into an agreement of sale on 28-10-2006, in respect of the suit schedule property, with the 1st respondent. They filed the suit with a prayer to pass a decree for refund of the amount, paid as advance. However, at a later stage, they filed I.A.No.301 of 2009 with a prayer to amend the plaint, to incorporate the relief of specific performance of the agreement. They have also filed I.A.No.302 of 2009 under Order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C., with a prayer to implead respondents 2 to 6 herein. It was pleaded that the 1st respondent had an agreement of sale with respondent No.2, who in turn had an agreement of sale with other respondents, and that has become necessary to implead the proposed respondents and to amend the prayer in the suit. The trial Court dismissed the applications, through separate orders dated 13-08-2010. Hence, these two revisions. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents. Even according to the petitioners, there is no privity of contract between themselves and the proposed respondents. Further, the agreement is entered into with a person, who did not have any saleable interest. The trial Court took note of these aspects and dismissed the applications. This Court is not inclined to take a different view. The revisions are accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.24-08-2011 KO