1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.354 OF 2011 The State of Maharashtra ..Applicant Versus Nayabrao s/o Vithoba Padul and ors. ..Respondents Mr N.H.Borade, A.P.P. for applicant-State CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND A.V. POTDAR, JJ. DATE : 28th February 2011 PER COURT 1. By this application the applicant challenges the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge-2, Jalna dated 26.11.2010, acquitting the original accused 1 to 5 and 7 of offences punishable under Section 302 read with sec.149, 148 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act. 2. We have heard the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the applicant and we have perused the record and proceedings. Upon such perusal, according to us this is a fit case for granting leave. Accordingly, this application is allowed and leave as prayed for is granted. Appeal stands admitted. Action under Section 390 of the Code of Criminal Procedure be taken by the trial Court by issuing bailable warrant for Rs. 10,000/- each against the respondents. This appeal to be heard along with Criminal Appeal No.483 of 2010. ( A.V. POTDAR, J. ) ( P.V. HARDAS, J.) (vvr/354.11criappln) 2