:1: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.4 OF 2006 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders. of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.D.S.Salvi for the applicant. Mr.A.H. Ponda for the Respondent. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE,J. DATED : 09/1/2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard both sides. 2. Rule. By consent, rule made returnable forthwith. 3. This revision application is filed by Union of India for quashing and setting aside the order dated 22.12.2005 passed by the Sessions Judge relaxing the condition of bail granted by the Magistrate to respondent No.1 vide his order dated 24.8.2004. By the impugned order, the respondent has been allowed to go abroad to Dubai for a :2: period of two months to remain with her husband and son from the date when she leaves India subject to several conditions as contained in the order. The conditions imposed includes furnishing additional local surety of Rs.5/- lacs and deposit of additional cash amount of Rs.7/-lacs. The A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the Union of India states that gold was weighing 30-KG. and currency was worth Rs.1,77,865/- have already been seized. That, in the case of conviction the maximum fine amount could be approximately Rs.20/-lacs. The advocate for the respondent no.1 states that the security for the amount of Rs.15/-lacs have already been directed to be furnished. The Advocate for the applicant states that further security to the tune of Rs.5/- lacs would suffice the purpose. In the circumstances, the order is confirmed subject to modification that in stead of furnishing additional local surety of Rs.5/- lacs the respondent No.1 will :3: furnish one or two local sureties for the amount of Rs.10/- lacs. Rule is made absolute accordingly. It is made clear that all other conditions imposed in the impugned order are confirmed. (R. S. MOHITE, J.)