IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3003 OF 2005 Shri Harivansh Surajmal Sharma ... Petitioner V/s. The Municipal Commissioner & ors ... Respondents Mr.Y.B.Yadav for the petitioner. Ms.Trupti Puranik for the respondent no.1. Mr.Uttangale for the respondent no.2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED 5th September, 2006 5th September, 2006 5th September, 2006 P.C. It is the case of the petitioner that the SRA scheme is coming on part of the land which does not form part of the SRA scheme. The petitioner has already filed a suit. If that be the case, this would not be a fit case to exercise our extraordinary jurisdiction. It will be open to the petitioner to take appropriate steps as are available in law including in the suit which is pending. 2. With the above observations, the petition stands disposed of. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]