1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR. CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 74 OF 2006IN W.P. NO. 31/2004 Sau. Yashree Sadaphal & another Vs. Sanjeev Jaiswal, Collector others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's Orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri AC Dharmadhikari, Adv. for the petitioners. Shri MI Dhatrak, Adv. for respondent No. 3. Shri MP Khajanchi, Adv. for respondent Nos. 4 & 5. CORAM : Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, J. DATE : 03rd February, 2009 Learned Counsel for the parties agree that issue involved in this contempt petition could be more conveniently determined and considered in the proceedings initiated by the petitioner before the trial Court under the provisions of Order XXXIX rule 2(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure. No observations and findings are made in the contempt petition as they are likely to prejudice the case of either of the parties, before the trial Court in the pending proceedings under Order XXXIX rule 2(a) C.P.C. In view of the statement made on behalf of the parties, contempt petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. JUDGE wwl