1 wp 2491.92 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2491 OF 1992 Shaikh Ali S/o Shaikh Ahmed .. Petitioner Versus 1. Shaikh Nanhe S/o Shaikh Fakir and others .. Respondents Shri P. R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate h/f Shri S. G. Rudrawar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Smt. M. A. Kulkarni, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1-a to 1-c. Shri T. W. Pathan, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1-d. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 18TH NOVEMBER, 2011. PER COURT : . Shri Katenshwarkar, the learned counsel seeks leave to delete the respondent No. 1-d. Shri Pathan, the learned counsel for the respondent No. 1-d submits that the respondent No. 1-d has a right in the suit property being a legal heirs of Shaikh Nanhe Shaikh Fakir and is entitled to the rights in the suit property as legal heir of Shaikh Nanhe Shaikh Fakir. 2 wp 2491.92 2. The petitioner has sought leave to unconditionally withdraw the writ petition as against the respondent No. 1-d. The petitioner has not sought any liberty of the Court. As such, the petitioner has right to withdraw the writ petition unconditionally against the respondent No. 1-d. That would not affect the right of respondent No. 1-d, accrued to him if he proves to be the legal heir of Shaikh Nanhe Shaikh Fakir. 3. The writ petition is as such dismissed as withdrawn as against the respondent No. 1-d. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/Nov. 11