IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Government Appeal No. 79 of 2009 State of Uttarakhand. …..…Appellant. Versus Santosh Kumar and another. …….Respondents. Hon’ble Alok Singh, J. Mr. Nandan Arya, learned AGA for the State of Uttarakhand / appellant. Heard on delay condonation application no. 1331 of 2009. For the reasons stated, delay condonation application is allowed. Delay in filing the special leave to appeal is condoned. Special leave to Appeal No. 97 of 2009 Heard. This is an application seeking leave of this court to file appeal against the order of discharge passed by the Revisional Court. While passing the impugned order, Revisional Court has recorded the reasons to discharge the accused. I have perused the impugned judgment / order dated 06.07.2009. From the perusal of impugned judgment / order it seems that civil dispute has been given colour of criminal offence. Learned Revisional Court has recorded 2 that charges are groundless. Even otherwise, no appeal is maintainable against the discharges. Learned AGA stated that this appeal may be treated as revision. Since there is no illegality or jurisdictional error in the impugned judgment / order dated 06.07.2009 passed by the court below in criminal revision no. 3 of 2009, prayer of Mr. Nandan Arya is rejected. Special leave to appeal no. 97 of 2009 is rejected. Consequently, Government Appeal No. 79 of 2009 stands dismissed. (Alok Singh, J.) 16.12.2009 SKS