IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 12248 of 2009 Between: M/s. Dharti Dredging & Infrastructure Limited, formerly Dharti Dredging and Construction Limited, having its office at Point of View, B.S. Maktha, Begumpet, Hyderabad, represented by its Vice President (Contracts), Mr.D.Nageswara Rao S/o.late D.Venkateswarlu ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Deputy Secretary & Alternate Attorney of the Board, Visakhapatnam Port Trust, Visakhapatnam - 533 035, Andhra Pradesh. 2 Visakhapatnam Port Trust, Engineering Department, Visakhapatnam - 533 035, Andhra Pradesh. Represented by its Chief Engineer. 3 Federal Bank Limited, Lakdikapul, Hyderabad 500 004, Represented by its Chief Manager. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ, direction or order especially in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd Respondent not to honour the request of the 2nd respondent to pay any sum under the Bank Guarantee dated 07.08.2006 as extended from time to time pending disposal of the Arbitration O.P.No.511/2009 and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.RAVI Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.P.SRI RAGHU RAM The Court made the following : ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Mr.Justice B.Prakash Rao) It is submitted by Sri Sandeep Reddy Sama, learned counsel representing Sri S.Ravi, learned counsel for the petitioner, that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infrucutous. No order as to costs. _________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J _______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J Date: 29th June, 2009 SKM