IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7003/2004 Bhoorathnam Construction Company Private Limited Versus The State of Rajasthan and Others Date of Order ::: 20.05.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Kuldeep Sharma, Advocate, for Shri Sameer Jain, Counsel for petitioner Shri Bharat Vyas, AAG, and Ms. Shweta Pareek, Advocate, for Shri Sanjay Pareek, Counsel for respondents #### By the Court:- Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press his application dated 1st April, 2008, for early hearing of the writ petition and seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition itself with liberty to approach the Standing Committee to arrive at a decision. The learned counsel for the petitioner further prays that the Standing Committee may be directed to decide the matter within a period of three months from the date of filing of the representation. The prayer is not opposed by the learned counsel for the respondents. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. The Standing Committee is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of its filing. No order as to costs. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman// IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Misc. Stay Application No.6022/2004 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7003/2004 Bhoorathnam Construction Company Private Limited Versus The State of Rajasthan and Others Date of Order ::: 20.05.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Kuldeep Sharma, Advocate, for Shri Sameer Jain, Counsel for petitioner Shri Bharat Vyas, AAG, and Ms. Shweta Pareek, Advocate, for Shri Sanjay Pareek, Counsel for respondents #### By the Court:- Consequent upon dismissal of the writ petition itself, the stay application, filed therewith, does not survive and the same is also dismissed. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//