IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1029 of 2008 ABHISHEK KUMAR @ VICKY @ VICKY KUMAR, s/o. Chandra Dev Singh, r/o. village-Sain Parwara, P.S. Belsar, District- Vaishali, at present Mohalla- Kolhua Chowk, P.S. Ahiyapur, District- Muzaffarpur. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 18.03.2009 This revision is against the order dated 13.03.2008 of the learned Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur as passed in Cr. Appeal No.93 of 2007, whereby the order dated 04.08.2007 of the Juvenile Justice Board regarding refusal of bail to the revisionist/petitioner, who is being tried as a juvenile in conflict with law before the Juvenile Justice Board, Muzaffarpur for the offences under Sections 25(1-B)(A), 26 & 35 of the Arms Act, has been upheld on the ground that such prayer of the revisionist has been earlier rejected up to this Court vide order dated 28.08.2006 as passed in Cr. Revision No.374 of 2006. It appears that earlier the revisionist juvenile in conflict with law had moved a bail application before the Juvenile Justice Board, which prayer was rejected by the Board and which order of rejection was challenged before the Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur under Cr. Appeal No.86 2 of 2005 which too was dismissed and against this dismissal order the revisionist preferred Cr. Rev. No.380 of 2006 but the same was also dismissed by this Court on the ground that the petitioner was apprehended with a loaded pistol and that on his confession a looted motor- cycle relating to Kanti P.S. Case No.37 of 2005 under Section 392 & 411 I.P.C. was also recovered from a garage and that there was likelihood of the petitioner going in association with the criminal if he was released on bail. Since the prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected by this Court under aforesaid Cr. Revision No.380 of 2006, the petitioner took a second round of prayer for bail commencing at the Juvenile Justice Board itself and made a prayer before the Board which was rejected by the Board vide its order dated 04.08.2007 and the rejection order having been affirmed by the learned Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur under Cr. Appeal No.93 of 2007, the petitioner is before this Court again after traversing the second round of bail prayer. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a juvenile and the simple allegation on 3 him is that he was apprehended with a loaded country- made pistol. Learned counsel says that the appellant is confined into the remand-home since 23.03.2005, thus four years is going to complete in four days. Learned counsel says that he undertakes on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner will maintain good conduct in future. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner Abhishek Kumar @ Vicky @ Vicky Kumar is admitted to bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Muzaffarpur in Kanti P.S. Case No.54 of 2005 with the condition that one of the bailors must be the father. Mkr. (C.M. Prasad, J.)