IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23334 of 2011 Jummi @ Jumman @ Shahid, Son of Late Rashid Alam Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 01.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302/201 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that for misuse of privilege of bail for one date the petitioner has remained in custody since 6.6.2011 and undertakes to be vigilant in future, and remain physically present as directed by this Court on the earlier occasion, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge, II, Bhagalpur in connection with Sessions Trial No. 92 of 2007, Trial No. 14 of 2007 + Sessions Trial No. 1039 of 2007 subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and another bailor shall be the son of the petitioner namely Hasam. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the 2 court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, and (iv) That the petitioner will be physically present on each date and if he fails to do so without reasonable cause, his bail will be cancelled. Md. Ibrarul ( Anjana Prakash, J.)