IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.1451 of 2005 Between: 1 H.Hanumanthu, s/o Durgappa, r/o Papampalli Vi., Kalyandurg Mandal, Anantapur District. 2 H.Nagaraju, s/o Chittappa, r/o Papampalli Vi., Kalyandurg Mandal, Anantapur District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Managing Director, APSHCL, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Anantapur, Anantapur District. 3 The District Manager (Housing), Anantapur, Anantapur District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any appropriate writ more particularly issue one nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in cancelling houses allotted to the petitioners, without issuing notice and opportunity of hearing, passed the proceedings in Rc.No.1173/NS & NS/2004/E3, dated 24-7-04 is been illegal, unjust, unilateral, and pass such other or further orders Counsel for the Petitioner:KOTHAPALLI RAM MOHAN CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOUSING The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.1451 of 2005 ORDER: When this matter came up yesterday, there was no representation for the petitioners, and the learned Counsel for the petitioners was absent. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Today the matter is appearing under the said caption. In spite of the same, learned Counsel for the petitioners is absent and there is no representation on his behalf. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed for default/non-prosecution. No costs. ____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 25.09.2008 vs To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RS}