^^^s^^a^s^^a$" HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) No.122/2010 Sukhchand Sethiya, aged about 29 years, S/o Shri Jai Singh, Occupation- Panchayat Secretary, Vlliage Panchayat Khamargaon, CONTi \<3 C( jayaua A— ^\(.^4'3i<-Ifini^ Jagadalpur (Bastar) (Chhattisgarhj Ravindra Nath posted as Deputy Director, Panchayat- and Social Weifare, Dlstrict- Bastar, Jagadalpur (C.G.) DC iMnifl. a^.^iiN 'iu^ii" Sa-'Si^asP'i A l./'?A5i^^/"^l^ ^^^"s ?!^L--s'4S ^^ ^*^? if"^^^/1^.? ff^y y'-i^^^wvt.^^M*:^.'f^.v^^- IM^^ O I!I@SH usipszi, UOUHS^E TOF rssponiosnr iMG'.z. 'W.P.(S) No.1598/2007 was disposed of by this Court on 24tn of Febmary 2010 and the followins order was passed back wages, as afore-stated. The impugned order dated 5.4.2006 (Annexure P/2) is set aside. Hov.'eyer, the respondents are at liberty to initiate alleged misconduct committed by hlm, if so advised, in accordance vi'ith law and in terms of the procedure prescribed irs Ruie 7 offhe Ruies, 1999, No order asto costs." --^'f.' €3 ^fffe ''^"'^^'i' ^.. '*s€^' Learned counsel for the petitioner submrts that since the order passed by this Court had to fite this contempt reply on behatf of respondent No.2 has been fited. Learned counsei for respondent No.2 submits that the order passed by this Court has alreae with, as the petitioner has been reinstated vide order 18 June 2010 and his dues have been cleared. He submits that the cheque was issued in favour of him. He refers to the certificate Annexure R-2/3. filed by respond' to, 1 am of the opi the order datec io.2 e !S SUTTiC! th contempt, now, are In view of Sinha judge sh^rss