1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.965 OF 2009 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.950 OF 2009 State Bank of Patiala .. Plaintiffs Vs. Dattatray D. Pednekar and Anr. .. Defendants Mr.Pravin Patel i/b m/s.Pradip Shukla and Co. for the plaintiffs Mr.Viral Shukla i/b M/s.Shukla and Associates for defendant no.2 CORAM : S.C.Dharmadhikari, J. DATE : October 12, 2010 P.C. : 1. This is a Chamber Summons seeking condonation of delay of 14 days in filing Vakalatnama in Summary Suit. 2. The explanation in prayer 2 of the affidavit in support, according to the learned counsel appearing for the plaintiffs is not supported by any documentary evidence. 3. I am not in agreement with the learned counsel for the plaintiffs because the defendants have satisfied the court that the delay has been caused on 2 account of reasons beyond their control and the explanation in that behalf is bonafide. 4. In such circumstances, delay of 14 days in filing Vakalatnama is condoned . Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) subject to cost quantified at Rs.1000/-. Costs condition precedent. ( S.C.Dharmadhikari, J. )