‘ smLE ELmw ’ @ IN THE HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR E ) PETITIONER: WRIT PETIT10N(S Nozw‘yq 0f2011 /' Balaram )Chouhan S/o Late Shri ,Anand Ram ‘Chouhan, aged albout 50 years occupatmn serv1ce, posted as sweeper Clty D1spensary, Jute M111 Ralgarh (CG) R/o behmd I Kelo Vlhar Near‘ Trimurti Tample Panjari Plant Raigarh, District Raigarh (CG). ‘4 Versus /1.~ The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Health and ' Family Departmentr Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). ’ The Director D1rectorate of Health Serv1ces Chhatt1sgarh Ralpur (CG) ' .‘ The Collector Ralgarh Dlstnct Ralgarh (CG) The Chief Medial and Health, fficer, Raigarh, District Raigarh (CG). The’Civil Surgeon cum Chief Hospital t Raigarh, District Ra1garh (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA wa O HIGHCOURTOF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETIT!ON (S) NO. 2454 OF 2011 (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) :Single-Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- § ,Shri Sushobhit Singh, Advocate for t%1e petitioner. ‘3 Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer,.forthe $tate. 3 ORDER (ORAL) i (Passedon'ogm day of Mayi 201 1) 1., - The? petitioner, by this petition, seeks a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner for. Dresser Grade—ll Training and to grant promotion on/the said post in the lightof circdlar dated 27.1 1 .2006 (Annexure P—5) and further quashing' of the communication dated 23.04.2011 (Annexure P-12). 2. Fori‘the’same reiief, the petitioner has preferred a writ petition earli’er, being W.P.(S) No.757/20-11,r which was disposed of, on the statement made by the State counsel that the representation dated 13.10.2010, shall be considered, [as early as possibie, r preferably within a period of four weeks. 3. According to the petitioner, the samecould not be done within the r prescribed time. Thereafter, the petitioner received the impugned _' communication dated;23.04.2011 (Annexure P-12), wherein, it' Was clearly stated 'tha‘tr in compliance of the order dated 09.02.2011, passed in W.P.(S) No.757/2011, the matter ‘is pending consideration before‘the Joint Director, Health Services, tate of Chhattisgarh. .The petitioner, feeling aggrieved, has S PETITIONER Balaram Chouhan Versus I RESPONDENTS The State of Chhat‘tisgarh & Others 2 in preferred this petition, seeking for the same reiiefr Is beyond once comprehension that once the case of the petitioner is under consideration, as communicated to the petitioner by the impugned communication dated 23.04.2(911, how the relief to quash the said communication may be sought for. if there is a delay, the petitioner ought to have chosen a different forum for redressal of his grievance and not filing the instant petition. This is a classicai exampie of misuse of judicial process. In order to discourage misuse of judicial process, as involved in thisl case, the petition is dismissed with costs quantified to be a sum of Rs.3000/— payable to'the High Court Legal Aid Committee. i ; r :r i