07.4.2025 Sl. 30 Samarpita Court No.655 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction Appellate Side CRA 396 of 2005 Sukh Chand Ghosh & Ors. Vs. The State of West Bengal 1. Learned Advocate for the appellants are not present. 2. Learned Advocate for the State is not present. 3. It appears from the order passed by the Court dated 21.5.2024, wherein, the concerned Police Station was directed to produce the appellants before the Court on the next date of hearing. 4. Report is submitted by the department, indicating that the said direction passed by the Court dated 21.5.2024 was communicated to the Superintendent of Police, Malda, but no compliance report has been received from to that effect. 5. The Superintendent of Police, Malda, is hereby directed to submit an explanation regarding non-compliance of the direction passed by this Court dated 21.5.2024 before the next date of hearing. 6. Learned Public Prosecutor of this Court, is hereby requested to appoint one Advocate from the empanelled list to represent the State in this case. 7. Department is directed to communicate this order to the Superintendent of Police, Malda, immediately. 8. Learned Public Prosecutor of this Court, is hereby requested to appoint one Advocate from the empanelled list to represent the State in this case. 9. Department is directed to communicate this order to the office of the learned Public Prosecutor of this Court. 10. Let the matter appear in the list on 9th June, 2025. 2 (Prasenjit Biswas, J.)