IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI FRIDAY, THE 23RD OCTOBER 2009 / 1ST KARTHIKA 1931 Mat.Appeal.No. 410 of 2009(F) ---------------------------- OP.1038/2007 of FAMILY COURT, KOTTAYAM .................... APPELLANT/RESPONDENT ----------------------------------- SAJIMON,S/O.PADMANABHA PILLAI, POOVAKULATH HOUSE, KARIMPANI P.O. MATTAKKARA, AKALAKUNNAM VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.PHILIP T.VARGHESE SRI.THOMAS T.VARGHESE RESPONDENT : PETITIONR ------------------------ INDULEKHA, D/O. THULASIDASAN PILLAI, LAL BHAVAN, CHENNAMKARI, EAST P.O. KAVALAM, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT ADV. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN FOR R1 SRI.SAIJO HASSAN FOR R1 THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ------------------------------------ Mat.Appeal No.410 of 2009 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of October, 2009 JUDGMENT BASANT, J. This appeal is preferred by the appellant/husband against a decree for divorce passed by the court below. When this appeal came up for hearing, both counsel submit that all outstanding disputes have been settled and the appellant does not, in these circumstances, want to prosecute this Appeal. He accepts the impugned decree for divorce, submits the learned counsel for the appellant. 2. This Appeal is, in these circumstances, dismissed as prayed for. The impugned order is upheld. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE) rtr/-