IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. BIKSHAPATHY * * * WRIT PETITION NO : 10976 of 1994 Between: G.V. Narasimha Charyulu S/o. Venkatacharyulu aged 56 yrs, R/o. Rehabilitatiion Colony, Visakhapatnam. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Joint Collector Visakhapatnam Dist. 2 The Asst. Manager (Personnel) Visakhapatnam Steel Project Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more especially one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings of the 1st respondent in Rc.No.911/92, R2 Dated 30th August, 1993 as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to reinstate the petitioner as Technician with all the consequential benefits. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.SRI RAGHU RAM (NOT PRESENT) For the respondent No.1 : G.P. for Revenue Counsel for the Respondent No.2: MR.V.RAJAGOPAL REDDY The Court made the following : O R D E R : 1. The learned Counsel for the petitioner is not present. There is no representation on his behalf. 2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No costs. ________________ G. BIKSHAPATHY, J Dated:02-09-2004. ccm. To 1 The Joint Collector Visakhapatnam Dist. 2 The Asst. Manager (Personnel) Visakhapatnam Steel Project Visakhapatnam. 3. Two CCs to the G.P. for Revenue, High Court Buildings, A.P.Hyderabad.(OUT) 4. Two CD copies