IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION. TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION. TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION. SUIT No.1214 of 1989 WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS No.299 of 2008 SHREE RAM CONSTRUCTIONS ..Plaintiffs. Vs. SARDAR TARASINGH MANCHANDA ..Defendant. RAJGURU DEVELOPERS PVT LTD. ..Applicant. (In Chamber Summons) Ms Sunita Jagtap with S. T. Manek, Advocate for the Plaintiffs. Mr Viral Vora for the applicant (In Chamber Summons) Mr Khan Javed Akhtar for the Defendant. CORAM: V. C. DAGA, J. CORAM: V. C. DAGA, J. CORAM: V. C. DAGA, J. DATED: 21.02. 2008. DATED: 21.02. 2008. DATED: 21.02. 2008. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Chamber summons is not on today’s board. By consent taken on board for final hearing. 2. The original plaintiff-"M/s Shree Ram Construction" filed a suit for specific performance of agreement against the defendant Sardar Taransingh. It appears that during pendency of the suit by the deed of conveyance dated 11.2.2008, the plaintiff has assigned all its rights in respect of suit property in favour of "M/s Rajguru Developers Private [ 2 ] [ 2 ] [ 2 ] Limited". The conveyance of assignment is a registered document. Photocopy is placed on record /annexed to chamber summons as Exh.A. 3. The consent terms are signed by plaintiff no.1, plaintiff No.2 and the defendant. In the consent terms it is also recorded that in view of deed of assignment, plaintiff no.2 be added as co-plaintiff and amendment to the plaint be permitted accordingly. 4. In view of the terms of settlement placed on record dated 21.2.2008 "M/s Rajguru Developers Private Limited" is permitted to be impleaded as plaintiff no.2 in the suit. Amendment to be carried forthwith. Chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) accordingly. 5. Representatives of "M/s Rajguru Developers Pvt. Ltd." are appearing for the plaintiff nos.1 and 2 as their duly constituted and authorised attorney vide power of attorney dated 8.2.2008. Photocopy of which is retained on record, marked as Article X for identification. The compromise/terms of [ 3 ] [ 3 ] [ 3 ] settlement are also countersigned by the respective Advocates appearing for the parties. Same is taken on record and marked Article X-1 for identification. The defendant is present in person. He accepts the terms and conditions recorded in the consent terms; whereas the plaintiffs are represented through their Power of Attorney holder, who also admits the terms of settlement. All these parties are identified by their respective Advocates. 6. Having gone through the consent terms, I find that the terms of settlement are reasonable, proper and in accordance with the law. Accordingly, consent terms are accepted and recorded. 7. In the result, the suit stands decreed in terms of consent terms. Decree be drawn accordingly. Parties to bear their own costs. JUDGE. JUDGE. JUDGE.