IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6346 of 2010 ANUMANDALIYA GARIWAN MOTIA PALLEDAR SANGH THROUGH ITS SECRETARY BASUDEO YADAV, OFFICE AT NAYA BAZAR LAKHISARAI, P.S. – LAKHISARAI, DISTT. – LAKHISARAI …………………….… PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA, 2. THE DIRECTOR, I.C.D.S. DIRECTORATE, WELFARE DEPTT., GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA, 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, LAKHISARAI, DISTT. LAKHISARAI, 4. THE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, LAKHISARAI, DISTT. LAKHISARAI, 5. THE DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER, LAKHISARAI, DISTT. LAKHISARAI, 6. THE DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER, LAKHISARAI, DISTT. – LAKHISARAI AND 7. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, LAKHISARAI, DISTT. LAKHISARAI ………. ………………………………….. …….. RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 13.04.2010. This is the second writ petition at the instance of the petitioner. On an earlier occasion in CWJC No. 13126 of 2009 this Court on 07.10.2009 has passed the following order: “Petitioner claims to be a registered Society and Association – Anumandaliya Gariwan Motia Palledar Sangh. It has raised grievance in public 2 interest that in the district of Lakhisarai the Child Development Project Officer (respondent no.7), in collusion with Angan Bari Sevikas of the district, has defalcated money meant for poshahar distribution and on the basis of Annexure -3 it has been submitted that even the details and facts sought through Right to Information Act are not being furnished by the respondent no.7 and for that he has been fined by the State Information Commission. Considering the entire facts and circumstances, we dispose of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the District Magistrate, Lakhisarai ( respondent no.3) with all the details. If such a representation/complaint is filed before the respondent no.3 then he shall get the allegations enquired into or verified himself or through reliable official and take appropriate action in accordance with law thereafter. It is expected that necessary steps shall be taken within four months from the date of filing of the representation.” On a query being made from Mr. A. Amanullah, learned counsel for the State, he has fairly stated that the respondent no. 3 has proceeded with the enquiry and would finalise the same within a period of three months. 3 Recording such submission of the learned counsel for the State, the writ petition stands disposed of. Dilip ( Dipak Misra, C.J. ) ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J. )