HIGH COURT OP CHHATTIS©ARH:BILASPUII Single Bench: Hon'bte Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. Applicant Defendant M.C.CNo. 420 of2008 Hemlata, widow of Dugeshwar, aged about 27 yeare, Caste-Sahu, R/o Village- Bagtarai, Tah. Gurur, Distt. Durg (MP) (NowCG) Versus Resoondents Plaintifls 1. Amamath, S/o Otaram Sahu, aged about 35 yeare, R/o Village-Bagtarai, Tah. Gurur, Distt. Durg (CG) (2) Tomin Bai,D/o Olaram Sahu, sged about 27 years, R/o Village-Korra, ah. Dhamtari, Di^t Dhamtari (CG) (3) Mithilesh Kumari, D/o Olaram Sahu, aged about 23 yeare, R/o Village Bagtarai, tah. Guiur, Distt. Durg (CG) (4) Bhagwantan Bai, Widow of Olaram Sahu, aged about 23 years, R/o VilJage Bagtarai, Tah. Gurur, Distt. Dura(CG) : (5) State of M.P. Now Chhattisgarh Through Collector Durg, Distt. Dyrg ApDllcation for restoration of second suioeal No.3es2/2008 which was dismissed vide orcter dated 19.11^2008 Present: Shri A.N. Bhakta counsel for the applicant. Shri P.K. Ohurandhar, counsel for respondents No.1 to4. Shri Sameer Behar, PL fw the State/respondert No.5. ORALORDER (Passed on 24.02.2009) Learned counsel for the applicant dtel not press l.A. No.1 on the ground that doaiments have already been filed. (2) Heard on I.A. No.2 & 3 fortaking documents cm record. (3) Considered and allowed. Documents are taken on record. (4) Leamed counsel for the respondents No.1 to 4 did not oppose the prayer in M.C.C.,which is being djsposed offinally, at the stage ofadmission. (5) This M.C.C. arises out of an order dated 19.11.2008 passedin Second Appeal No.302/2008 which was dismissed in default. (6) For the reasons mentioned in the application, M.C.C. is alloweci subject to cost of Rs.250/- before the High Court Legal Aid Committ^ within 7 days. On deposit of cost withln the stipulated period, Second Appeal No.302/2008 shall be restored to file and be listed. ,lta'^t>es l D^ ^"'^^e ; rT