*1* wp.6024.09.923.sxw kps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6024 OF 2009 Dattatraya Guruappa Honrao and others. ..Petitioners -Versus- Ashok Dagadu Honrao and others. ..Respondents .......... Mr.P.N.Karlekar, for the Petitioners. Mr.V.S.Talkute, for the Respondent No.1. Ms.Aparna Vhatkar, AGP, for the Respondent No.4. .......... CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. Date : 19th July, 2011. P.C.: 1 The Petitioners have already invoked the jurisdiction of the appellate authority by filing an appeal before the Superintendent of Land Records challenging the orders passed by the Taluka Inspector of Land Records (TILR) dated 10.07.2006. 2 The grievance of the Petitioners is that the TILR proceeded despite being informed of pendency of the revision application. That revision application challenged the order of the Deputy Director of Land Records remanding the case to the TILR. The TILR should have awaited disposal of the revision application and not hastily concluded the inquiry. 3 In all fairness, Mr.Karlekar, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners, points out that against the order of the TILR, above appeal has been filed and it is pending and an application for stay made therein has been rejected by the Superintendent of Land Records vide his order dated 16.07.2007. 4 In my view, without going into the rival contentions and *2* wp.6024.09.923.sxw particularly, whether, the Respondents to this petition have any claim or not; the interest of justice would be served if the Superintendent of Land Records is directed to hear the pending appeal on merits and in accordance with law and without being influenced by any of the observations made by him at interlocutory stage. The Superintendent of Land Records shall make an endeavour to dispose of the said appeal within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. He should consider all material including the contentions of the Petitioners that the contesting Respondents have not proved the sale deed of 1970 and the adjudication by the civil court is in favour of the Petitioners. All contentions of all parties in the said appeal are kept open. 5 The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. No costs. (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J)