IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINIAL Writ Petition No. 2002 of 2008 (M/S) Master Aman Gupta. .............. Petitioner. Versus Smt. Sheela Devi & others. .............. Respondents Mr. Arvind Vashishth, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sharad Sharma, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 5. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. The learned District Judge, Dehradun, vide the impugned judgment dated 3rd October, 2008 has dismissed the revision petition filed by the petitioner herein against the order passed by the learned First Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Dehradun on 11th August, 2008 in Misc. Case No.65 of 2007, whereby the Objections filed by the petitioner under Section 47 read with Section 151 C.P.C. were rejected. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and find that both the courts below in execution proceedings have taken a correct view and rightly dismissed the Objection Petition filed by the petitioner. Even though the petitioner claims to be the successor of Bindeshwari Prasad, it has been held in Second Appeal as well as by the trial court that Bindeshwari Prasad was a licensee and the property in question was under the ownership of the predecessor in interest of respondents Nos. 1 to 5, namely, Radha Krishna. The predecessor in interest of the petitioner Bindeshwari Prasad, merely being a licensee, had no right or title to transfer his license rights in favour of the legal heirs. The petition has no merit and is dismissed in limine. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 17.11.2008 G