1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW PETITION NO. 95 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 658 OF 2005 Vidyut Vidya Mandir Ayodogik Prashikshan Kendra & another .. PETITIONERS. VERSUS Dhanraj s/o Devidas Chaudhari & another .. RESPONDENTS Mr. G.V. Wani, Advocate for the petitioners. ===== CORAM : P.R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 15 th JUNE, 2010. PER COURT : 1 This is a review petition filed against the order passed by this court in Writ Petition no. 658/2005 on 12-10-2007. This matter is being placed before this court for the first time today. By order, this court set aside the order of the School Tribunal, Nasik dt. 29-9-2004. The matter was remanded to the School tribunal for deciding the matter afresh on its own merits. It is directed that the School Tribunal shall decide the appeal as expeditiously as possible. All the points are kept open. Inspite of this, the review petitioners did not feel it 2 necessary, though three years are passed after passing order, that there should be any earlier circulation. Learned Adv. Shri Wani states that advocates circulate matter only if there is pressing urgency. Considering the order passed by this court regarding remand and direction to decide the matter expeditiously and in view of the fact that there is no stay order passed by this court, I am not satisfied with the merits of the review petition. Same is dismissed. 2 Registrar (Adm) is directed to enquire as to why this review petition was not placed before this court for almost three years even though there was specific directions by the Hon’ble The Chief Justice to place the matters before court within 15 days. Registrar (Adm) is directed to place his report before the Hon’ble Senior Judge, for appropriate action. ( P. R. BORKAR, J.) dyb/office/revpet95.10.odt