1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.5691 of 2007 (Nagpur District Bricks Manufacturers Association, through Secretary v. The State of Maharashtra, through Secretary and another) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Shri S.V. Manohar with Shri A.A. Naik, Advocates for Petitioner. Shri N.W. Sambre, Government Pleader for R- 1 and 2. Shri M.G. Bhangde, Senior Advocate, with Shri V.V. Naik, Advocate for Intervenor. CORAM : K.J. Rohee & R.C. Chavan, JJ. DATE : 21st January, 2008 Heard both the sides. The submissions filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2 show that the issue of vacation of stay is under active consideration of respondent No.1. It seems that as yet no decision is taken by respondent No.1. Respondent No.1 is, therefore, directed to decide the issue of vacation of stay within two weeks from the date of communication of this order. The learned Government Pleader for respondent No.1 and 2 to inform the decision of this Court to the concerned authority. 2 Place Civil Application No.212 of 2007 after four weeks. Steno copy of this order be furnished to the learned counsel for the parties. JUDGE JUDGE Later on : It has been pointed out to us by the learned Government Pleader Shri N. W. Sambre for respondents no.1 and 2 that three weeks' time was granted to respondent no.1 to decide the issue of vacation of stay. However, the order mentions only two weeks' time. In view of this the order is modified to that extent. JUDGE JUDGE pdl