{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.74 OF 2010 Godavari w/o Thakurdas Rizwani & others APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.P.S.Agrawal, Advocate for applicants Mr.V.G.Shelke, AGP for respondents No.1 and 2 State Mr.M.V.Deshpande, Advocate for respondent No.3 ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 7th May 2010 PER COURT: 1. Heard. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties heard finally at the stage of admission itself. 3. By the present CRA, the applicant has assailed the order dated 5th April 2008 passed by the SLAO-2 Nanded. By the said order reference filed by the present applicant was rejected by SLAO-2 on the ground that in the award old number has {2} mentioned as 16200/1 and new number of the said property is not mentioned. After going through the application itself in prayer clause, the applicant had given the detailed description of the property which is acquired under the Land Acquisition Act that the land acquired bears number survey No.16200/1 admeasuring 11.20 square meters and claimed compensation. In the order itself the new number of the property is given. 4. Merely on this technical ground the SLAO ought not to have rejected to refer the claim of the applicant to the reference court. Considering this aspect of the matter, the order dated 5th April 2008 requires to be quashed and set aside. 5. Accordingly, the CRA is hereby allowed. The SLAO-2, Nanded is hereby directed to refer the reference application of the petitioner, after following due procedure of law, to the competent court to decide the same in accordance with law. 6. Rule is thus made absolute on the terms indicated above with no order as to costs. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/B10/cra74-10