3$ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR w.p. (S) No. 5517/2007 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF TIE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Shri RR. Patankar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh, Govt. Advoote for the State. ORAL ORDER (2 1 .09.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J Heard. The petitioner, who is holding the substantive post of Assistant Teacher, has been ttansferred hem Middle School, Tolagaon, Khajragah to Middle School, Thandar, Block Chhm'khadan on administrative grounds on 20.07.2007. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that 2 sons of the petitioner are studying in Khairagarh, which is nearer to Tolagaon, therefore, if the petitioner is transferred from Tolagaon to Thandar, it will adversely affect the studies of children of the petitioner. I am unable to understand that how the transfer of the petitioner from Tolagaon to Thandar would affect the studies of children of the petitioner, who are studying at Khajragarh. If PETITIONERS Pradcep Kumar Gurudev, S]o Shri Motilal Gurudev, Agsd about 58 years, R/o Sonaxp'ara Wani No. 12, Khairagarh, Distn'ct Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS 1 State of Chhatu'sgarh, Thxcugh the Secretaxy School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 The Collector, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3. Block Education OElcer , Khairagarh District Rajnandgaon (CG) 2 WP. (S) No.551 7/2007 th6y would have been studying at Tolagaon, then, it would have @ f . &ected th¢ir studies, but when they axe already studying at Khairagarh, transfbr of the petitioner &om Tolagaon’ to Thandar would never affect their studies. Moreover, these are the personal di$culties of the employee, for which, he can go to the employer and make a representation to him. So far as the Courts are concerned, unless the order of transibr is shown to be vitiated by malandes or is affected by extraneous consideration or is passed in violation of any statutory Rules or the Act, the same are not to be interfered. I do not find any reason to interfere with the order passed on 20.07.2007. The petition has no merit and the same is dismissed at the motion stage itself. ‘ ‘M Sd/— Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge wWWL