IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 902 of 1997 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MISS JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- ALI MOOSA GHANCHI Versus AMAD MAMAD HINGORA [DECEASED] -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Civil Revision Application No. 902 of 1997 MR MB PARIKH for the Petitioner Respondent No.1 (deceased) Respondent No.2 served MR PV HATHI for the Respondent No.3 UNSERVED-EXPIRED (N) for Respondent No. 4 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MISS JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT Date of decision: 23/09/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT This Revision Application preferred under Section 115 CPC arises from the order dated 31st August, 1989 made by the learned Civil Judge (J.D.), Bhanvad, below Application Ex.5 in Regular Civil Suit No.31/1987. The learned advocate Mr.M.B.Parikh appears for the petitioner and states that pending this Revision Application the above referred Regular Civil Suit No.31/1987 has been finally disposed of on 3rd May, 2002. He, therefore, states that the present Revision Application does not survive. He seeks leave to withdraw the Revision Application. Leave is granted. Revision Application is disposed of as withdrawn. Rule is discharged. Interim order stands vacated. ( Ms. R.M. Doshit, J. ) /sakkaf