r f»^ \/ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR IViiSCELLANEOUS APPiM._Na,_S400F2003 Kvr APPELLANT : M/s Ambuja Cement Eastern Ltd., Through Dsvanand Pandey, Dy. General Manager ('P&A). P.0. Rawan, Tahsil Baloda Bazar, District Raipur Versus RESPONDENT : Unjon of india, Through GeneraJ Manager, South Eastem Railway (Now South East Centrai Railway), Biiaspur APPEAL UNDER SECTION 23 OF THE RAILWAY CLAISVIS TRSBUNALACT.1987 (Sinate Bench: Hon'ble EVSr. N.K. Aaarwat. J.) Present : Shri Ashish Shrivastava, counsei for the appeilant. Shri Amit Choudhary, counsel with Ms. Naushina Aii, counsel for the respondent. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 20th dayofApril, 2010) Shri Amit Choudhary along with Ms. Naushma Aii, learned counsel for the respondent referring to sub-section (1) of Section 23 of the Railways CEaims Tribunal Act 1987, have ralsed a preiiminary objection about the maintainability of the present appeaj before the High Court of Chhattisgarh as the impugned judgment has been passed by Bhopal Bench of Raiiways Claims Tribunal, which is located within the territorial jurisdiction of Madhya Pradesh High Court. 2. Shri Ashish Shrivastava, learned counsel for the appellant, in view of the pretiminary objection, seeks permission to withdraw the appeaf wlth the ilberty of fiiing another appea! before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. 3. Permlssibn granted. " " 4. With the above liberty, the appea! is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. The Registry is dlrected to return the certified copy of the impugned judgment to iearned counsei for the appeiiant immediately. Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge