HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6089 of 2011 ORDER: The Government acquired an extent of Ac.1.16¾ guntas of land of Nampalli Village, Vemulawada Mandal, Karimnagar District for providing house sites under a Government Scheme. A consent award was passed under Section 11(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short ‘the Act’) on 29.11.2010 by the third respondent and the respondent Nos. 4 to 7 are paid compensation. The Government acquired an extent of Acs.34.12 guntas of land in different survey numbers of Nampalli Village, Vemulawada Mandal, Karimnagar District. A consent award was passed in respect of Acs.1.10½ guntas and as regards the remaining land, a detailed award dated 29.11.2010 was passed. The petitioner contends that he purchased an extent of Acs.0.28 cents of land in Survey No. 185. As regards that land, the third respondent referred the matter to the Civil Court under Section 30 of the Act. Petitioner contends that he ought to have been paid the compensation for the land. The petitioner challenged the notification dated 18.7.2009 pertaining to the said land as well as the Award dated 21.11.2010 on the ground that he was not put on notice. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition for the respondents. Having regard to the fact that the petitioner purchased the land in Survey No. 185, the respondents were not under obligation to issue him individual notice unless the name of the petitioner was reflected in the revenue records. Further it is not necessary that the person must be issued individual notice or that he must be shown in the notification. In case, the petitioner held title, he could have put forward his contentions before the concerned authorities. Now that the matter is referred to the Civil Court under Section 30, the petitioner can put forward his contentions by getting himself impleaded. The question of interfering with the notification under Section 4(1) at this stage does not arise. Hence, this writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to get himself impleaded in the reference made under Section 30 of the Act in pursuance of the common Award dated 29.11.2010 passed by the third respondent. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY,J DATE: 18th March, 2011 Note: Furnish c.c. in one week. B/o pnb