s HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON»BLB8HRI JUSTICE PRITIMKER DIWAKBR W.P. <aa71 N0. 2044/200& PBTITIOKIBR Kanker Roadways, Tlirough tfae Managmg Partaer, Preetam Siagh Garcha, S/o, Late Jogendar Siag, aged about 59 years, R/o. Civil Liaes^ Raipur (CG) (AppUcaat before fhe R.T.A,) RB8PONDBNTS Versus 1. Reglonal Transport Aufhoxity, G,E. Road, Opposite Lal Ganga Shopping Mall, Raipur (CG) 2. Kamaljit Kaur, W/o. Late Satwant Singh Gill, aged about 40 years, C/o. Maliendra Travels, Raipiir, Distt. Raipur (AppUcant before fhe R,T.A.) WRIT PETITIOlff UHDBR ARTICLB 2»7OP THB CONSTITUTION OP INDIA ADoearance: Shri S.K.Bajpai, counsel for fhe petitk>ner. Shri Anm Sao, Govt. Advocate for fhe State/respondent No. 1. ORAL ORDER (24.04.2009) At the outset, Shri Ania Sao, Govt, Advocate for the State/resp. No. 1 submits that there is aa alteniative remedy avaUable to the petitioner for approachiag fhe State Traasport AppeUate Tribunal, Counsel for thLe petitioiier submits (hat at prcsent, post of Presidiag officer ia Stete Traasport AppeUate Tnbunalis lyiiig vacaiit Shri Sao has produced a copy of ffae oider dated 17<4,2009 passed by tibie State Govenmient regaixling appoiatment of Shn Ashok Kiimar Niiaonkar as tfae Presiding OJEcer ofthe State Transport Appellate Tribunal, In view of this fact, counsel for fhe petitioiier waate to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach fhe State Transport AppeUate Trihunal by filmg revision. Accordiagly, fhe petition is dismissed aa witiidrawa with Hberty as aforcsaid, However, it is directed that if fhe petitioner files fhe reviteion beforc fhe State Transport Appellate Tribuiial the same shall be decided expeditiQusty, Registry is dicected to rctiuii fhe certified copy of the order dated28,01.2009 passed by fhe Regioiial Traxispeirt Aufhority provided fhat duly attested Xen>x copy of the same is furrushed by the cotuasel for the petitioner. ^^—- ..sdio^aket ^^y