1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION ST. 292 OF 2010 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION ST.NO.4707 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Mr. R.M. Deshmukh, Advocate for applicant. Mr. S.P. Deshmukh, Advocate for respondents. CORAM: K.K. TATED, J. DATE : 16TH NOVEMBER, 2010. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. Present Revision Application is preferred by the original accused against the judgment and order dated 02-03-2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-1 Jalna in Criminal Appeal No. 22/2005. 3. Original complainant filed complaint against the present applicant and the 2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders same was allowed. Against that, the applicant preferred appeal. The appeal was dismissed and therefore, he preferred present Criminal Revision Application. In Criminal Revision Application, both the parties settled the dispute. They tendered compromise terms and conditions. The applicant - original accused as well as legal heirs of respondent - original complainant are present in the Court. They are identified by their respective Counsel. The compromise terms and conditions are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. Criminal Revision Application is disposed of in view of the compromise terms. Criminal Application stands disposed of accordingly. sd/- [K.K. TATED,J.] sut/NOV10/crivnst292.10