^ PETITIONER: HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (227) N0. 4817 OF 2008 Madan Gopal Rajput, S/o Late Shri Khushi Ram Rajput, aged about 58 years, R/o M-22 (Wrongly mentioned as M-21 ..in the impugned order), Avanti Vihar, Naar Shiy Temple, Telibandha, Raipur (Chhatdsgarh). RESPONDENTS />-. VERSUS 1. 2. 3. 4. The Board of Revenue Chhattisgarh Through President, '(Circuit Court at Raipur (Chhattisgarh). New Tilak Nagar Saha.kari Griha Nirman Samiti, Through its President, Shri Shankar Dayal Mishra, Resident of Shanti Nagar, Raipur (Ghhattisgarh). The Additionajl Collector (Revenue), Raipur District Raipur (Chhattisgarh). The Tahsildar, Raipur, Dist. Raipur (Chhattisgarh). £ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ' (SBiHon'tele Mr. T.P.Sharma,J.) Preserit:- Shri Devendra Patel,;Advpcate fpr the pedtioner. Shri D.S. Jairi, Advocate with Shri S.S. Rajput, Advocate fbr the respondentNo. 2. \ Shri Rakesh Jha, Dy. G.A. for the State/respondenfs No. 3 &4. • Y'. . None for the respondent No. 1. ORAL-ORDER (Passed on 05/08/2010) 1. Heard. 2. Order impugned dated 18/7/2008 passed by the Board of Revenue in review case No. R.W./14/R/A-70/S2/2007 • dismissing review pedtion filed against the orderdated 29/5/07 passed by Board of Revenue in revision case No. RN/14/R/A- 70/414/2006 perused. C'J; 3. At the outset, counsel for the respondent No. 2 submits that on 23/9/08 petitioner has been evicted form the encroachment land. Order dared 29/5/07 reveals that Board of revenue quashed subordinate Court and also review Court and has directed to proceed further. Operative Para-7 reads as follows:- V/ "7. 3(p[^3f ^ R^rlqui ?T2(T ^erri^rEp fir.^arjT ^\ (qci'ci'ii c^ ^ff^stCT ^ ^rf 'cppire -^iyidifl 'E^ 3n^?T 'PFTRT ^trif •sn^ 11 rt^d^K, wy 'cpt 'g^R 'ci?t TI^ fSl^Ef.TT •c^ qf^tgq ^ RfElcic) cpsar terr^ <f?t giRm 4»i4cfi^ wf i^ y(?]l)Rd feqr 3TTcn' tr 4. Order impugned dated 18/7/2008 does not suffer from any illegality virtually Board of Revenue has provided an opportunity of hearing to both the parties, I do not find any illegality in the order impugned requiring any interference in terms of under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Consequerifly, this petition is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. 5. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P Sharma Judge Bi