ticular$ 0f E@spemdents. (1} Na$e ané/oz' desinnakion of r egpgndents: 1 . iz‘n ouqh a SQcreiary, Séwaxim&at of Krriqien, $ovaxam9n Of £,p. Valla.hh Bhawan” $%Opa1' ? ‘ af /”. €¢ _ >/ M ‘ N \ wL W3) [0N a§ @hyam v Kama: Agrawal.. PQ€itiQner¢ 3 of $adhya @rgdesh aih¢x$g 56 RespQnden%s° hgpziCatiQn: icul;xs 9f applicaht: {i} Nam§ 0f Appli $hyam Kumar ‘awal. <5. 0f g i;i)Eéscripti$n an§ $xékutiva Enain$%rs z ” ice in w*ich $§§d. Kxxim&tian Divi$ion, $ Mahasamund, Raipur L $hxi $hyam Kumar £arawa1. Execuiive £mainegr‘ Erxiaa ion Division. , «iaipur iii 9' .> wCsNaé/af'mzoo amm (W) Wmm mm' / $7 my mm Wm *aifmm SB: Hon. Mr. Justice P‘ 13.n5.2m39: Shri Vaibhav Goven Mr. Arun Sao GA f0 CounseE for the p Wi‘thdraw this petition wi 'itinker Diwaker jhan counsel for the pettioner. ' the respondents/State. tEt§oner submits that he wants .tor liberty to make a representation befare the competent aut ority. He also prays for a direction to the competent authori y that the representation made by the petitioner may be d cided expeditiously in accordance with the circutar issued b the Government. Accordingiy, the pet tion is dismissed as withdrawn wit: iiberty as aforesaid. Re resentation, if any, filed bywthe petitioner, shatl be deci early as possible, strictly i Needless to say the optnton on the merit of the ed by the competent authority as. 1 accordance with Eaw, t this Court has not expressed'any n Sd/- ‘ " Pritinker Diwakeri Judge l case. l i