IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.O.C.P.No.1034 of 2009 Date of Decision:-16.9.2009 Surjit Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus Sadhu Singh Randhawa ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Mr.R.K.Arora, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.M.C.Berry, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): Learned counsel for the petitioners states that in compliance of the order passed by this Court, the respondent has passed the order (Annexure R1) deciding legal notice of the petitioners and, therefore, he be given liberty to challenge the aforesaid order. Dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioners to challenge the aforesaid order (Annexure R1) in accordance with law. Rule discharged. (Rakesh Kumar Garg) 16.9.2009 Judge AS