CR No. 7844 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 7844 of 2009 Date of decision:- 1.11.2010 Jai Narain ......petitioner vs. Gram Panchayat Khol and others ......respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: - Mr. Sandeep Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner HEMANT GUPTA, J (ORAL) Plaintiff is in revision aggrieved against the orders passed by learned trial Court on 4.3.2009 and learned first Appellate Court on 16.11.2009 whereby an application for ad interim injunction was dismissed. Plaintiff claims to be in possession of the suit property as successor in interest of his father Ram Saroop who is recorded as gair marusi cultivator in the year 1965-66 and 2000-2001. Both the Courts below have declined the application for grant of ad-interim injunction, inter alia, for the reasons that the record produced by defendants shows that Gram Panchayat has been leasing out the suit property since the year 1996. Therefore, the plaintiff cannot be said to be in possession of the suit property. The reasoning given by learned Courts below cannot be said to be suffering from patent illegality or material irregularity. The action of the Gram Panchayat in leasing out the property since the year 1996 shows that the stag entries recording Ram Saroop in possession of the suit property is CR No. 7844 of 2009 -2- prima facie not reliable. In view of the said fact, I do not find any patent illegality or material irregularity in the orders passed by the learned Courts below which may warrant any interference in the revisional jurisdiction of this Court. Revision stands dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 1.11.2010 preeti