^ ^^'^ INTHE fflGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR <1 PETITIONERS ^t^ ..^^^" W.P.NO. .I^d-4! OF 2001 1) M/s R.K. & COMPANY , a Partnership firm, duly registered under the relevant provisions of the Partnership Act 1932, Jain Mandir Road, Jagdalpur. . 2) M/s R Kumar & Brothers, a partnership firm duly registered under the relevant provisions of the partnership Act 1932, Jain Mandir Road, Jagdalpur 3) Rakesh Kumar Jain, son of Shri Gulab Chand Jain, partner in both the firm M/S R K & Co. and M/s R. KUMAR & Brothers, Jain Mandir Road, Jagdalpur. RESPONDENTS 7 VERSUS 1) RESERVE BANK OF INDIA A body Corporate Constituted under the relevant provislons of the Reserve Bank of India Act having its head office at Mumbai. f 2) CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA. A body Corporate Constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Under Takings) Act 1970, having its Central Office at Chander Mukhi, Nariman Point Mumbai 400 021 and a branch at Jagdalpur. 3) The Debt Recovery Tribunal, South Civil Lines Jabalpur. ^. . '->• WRIT PETITION UNDER ART1CLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF PROHIBITION MANDAMUS CERTIORARI ETC. AND/OR FOR ORDER(S) AND/OR FOR THE DIRECTIONS 1N THE NATURE OF THE WRITS. XI-HC-22 111i||igglji|ijiigigigggis|^ "^ ';:zn^T?Fr, ®tfiw}(o,1^<rtt^^< W^rWW%'"W»"P'.l'5'6'9/200-^ 200 ^¥r"^i f^i?i'3Tit^T ^Hi^^rf^T ^ ^rr^i'^n^R Trf^r 4.9.2001t Mr^BeP.Sharma for The present pefciticj of the Constitution of Indi^ that the guidelines issued are illegal^arbitrary and l|.he petitioner^ ^n under Articles 226/227 has been filed on the ground ^y the respondent no«l ( Panl) c<j>ntrary to law^ From the order dt<» Judge^ of Detets Recovery Trj have been concluded and the iili Having considered case and partlcularly the for judgment by trlbunaX^ jurisdiation under Article 3 is made^out at this stage^ appeal if such an eventualil The p^tltion is d liberty to prefer an appeal Sd/- ChiefJustice ^H^Nh •m^ff^ fe^t Tf^TT '^ sri^r? oTf^T 27^4.2001 passed by the Presiding bunal»it is clear that arguments case 1s reserved for orders. fhe facts and circumstances of the f^ct that the case is already reserved our opinion no case for exeraise of ;27 of the Constitution of India $owever,lfae may raise the grounds in ^y arises^ .sposed of at the stage with in case such an eventuality arlses< Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [Tft^^fe^ 1 L==