IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH JUNE 2007 / 6TH ASHADHA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 969 of 2007(S) ARISING FROM THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.21300/2005 Dated 13/07/2006 PETITIONERS: -------------------- ZAINUL ABIDEEN K., AGED 30 YEARS, S/O. UNNI MOHAMMED, VALAPPARA KANDIYIL HOUSE, CHEMPUTHOOR, MONGAM P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE ABRAHAM RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. P.SIVAJADAS, AGED 52 YEARS, S/O. PAPPAN, SECRETARY, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. MUHAMMEDALI VALANCHERY, DISTRICT OFFICER, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, MALAPPURAM. BY STANDING COUNSEL FOR KPSC SRI.P.V.SASIDHARAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & K.T.SANKARAN,J. ---------------------------------------------------- CONT. CASE (C) NO. 969 OF 2007 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th June, 2007 JUDGMENT H.L.DATTU, C.J. The first petitioner in W.P.(C) No.21300 of 2005 is the complainant in this contempt petition. He asserts that the respondents in the contempt petition have disobeyed the orders and directions issued by this Court in the aforesaid writ petition. Therefore, he request us to initiate appropriate contempt proceedings against the respondents as provided under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act. 2. Learned counsel, Sri.George Abraham, very fairly states that aggrieved by the order passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.21300 of 2005, dated 13th July 2006, the respondents in the writ petition have filed S.L.P.No.16643 of 2006 before the apex Court. 3. Since the matter is pending before the apex Court, it will not be appropriate for us to proceed against the respondents as requested by the petitioner. Therefore, for the present, we do not take cognizance of the contempt petition filed by the petitioner. CONT. CASE (C). NO.969 OF 2007 :: 2 :: Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approach this Court, if need arises in future. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) Chief Justice (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/