In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh … Crl. Writ Petition No. 1537 of 2011 Date of decision: August 16,2011 Beena Sahota ..Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ..Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice L.N.Mittal Present: Mr. Shilesh Gupta, DAG,Punjab ... L.N.Mittal,J.(Oral) Reply on behalf of State of Punjab filed today in Court, is taken on the record subject to all just exceptions. Averments made in the Telegram have been denied in the reply. It is alleged in the reply that FIR No. 73 dated 22.7.2011 under Sections 307/ 326/148 and 149 IPC and under Section 25 of the Arms Act has been registered against petitioner's brother Ravi Sahota son of the alleged detenue and in that case, alleged detenue Parveen Kumari made statement on 22.7.2011 at 11 P.M. along with her relative Ishwar Lal and investigation against the other party has been started as cross-case. It is also alleged that Parveen Kumari was not arrested or detained by any police official of the concerned Police Station and false and frivolous allegations have been levelled to put pressure on the police to save petitioner's brother from arrest who is wanted in the aforesaid FIR. However, petitioner's brother Ravi Sahota has been arrested on 23.7.2011. In view of the aforesaid reply, no further action or order is required in the instant Criminal Writ Petition, which is accordingly disposed of. August 16,2011 (L.N.MITTAL) nk JUDGE