IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6762 of 2010 RUPAK KUMAR @ RUPAK MODI son of Prabhunath Modi, r/o Mohalla Mahmadabad, P.S. Lodipur, Dist. Bhagalpur…Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 26.2.2010 Heard Dr. Manoj Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Rameshchand Datta, learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case instituted under 302 of the Indian Penal Code and also under section 27 of the Arms Act. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is not named in the first information report and even during course of investigation merely suspicion has been raised against him. Learned counsel for the State submits that this is case of the year 2003 and petitioner has surrendered after a long time on 16.12.2009 Be that as it may, in the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction C.J.M, Bhagalpur in Lodipur (Sabour) P.S. case No. 205 of 2003. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner does not make regular pairvi in the court below either personally or through his lawyer then the State or the informant shall be at liberty to file a petition for cancellation of his bail and the court below would be obliged to consider the said petition in accordance with law. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) M.Rahman