IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1384 of 2011 Surendra Kumar and others. … Petitioners. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. … Respondents. Mr. M.C.Kandpal, Senior Advocate, with Mr. S.S.Chaudhary, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. K.C.Tiwari, Brief Holder, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 7. Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 8 and 9. WITH (1) Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1385 of 2011 Madan Lal and others. … Petitioners. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. … Respondents. Mr. M.C.Kandpal, Senior Advocate, with Mr. S.S.Chaudhary, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. K.C.Tiwari, Brief Holder, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 7. Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 8 and 9. (2) Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1386 of 2011 Smt. Kiran Devi and others. … Petitioners. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. … Respondents. Mr. M.C.Kandpal, Senior Advocate, with Mr. S.S.Chaudhary, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. K.C.Tiwari, Brief Holder, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 7. Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 8 and 9 (3) Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1439 of 2011 Munnabar Ali and others. … Petitioners. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. … Respondents. Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. K.C.Tiwari, Brief Holder, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 5&6. Date August 20, 2011. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2 Since the controversy involved in all the four writ petitions is similar, therefore, for the sake of arguments, they are being decided by this common judgment. The petitioners in all the four writ petitions have sought a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the same order dated 20-6-2011 passed by the Assistant Collector, 1st Class/Upziladhikari, Kashipur Udham Singh Nagar, whereby Parwana Amaldaramad issued on 16-5-2007 has been maintained the objection of the objectors Ravindra Singh Singh and others (petitioners in W.P.M.S. No. 1363 of 2011, Ravindra Singh and others Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others) dated 19-5-2007 has been rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioners have submitted that the order under challenge in all these writ petition is the same, which had been assailed by the petitioners in W.P.M.S. No. 1363 of 2011, Ravindra Singh and others Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others. Since the order impugned in these writ petitions had also been assailed by Ravindra Singh and others in W.P.M.S. No. 1363 of 2011, Ravindra Singh and others Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others and this Court has already allowed the said writ petition by separate order passed today itself therefore, it would be expedient in the interest of justice, that all these four writ petition may be disposed of in terms of the order dated 20-8-2011 passed in W.P.M.S. No. 1363 of 2011, Ravindra Singh and others Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others. All these writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the order dated 20-8-2011 passed in Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1363 of 2011, Ravindra Singh S/O Jagat Singh and others Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others. Costs easy. All pending applications also stand disposed of. (B.S.Verma, J.) RCP