SA No. 25/ 2010 Hon ’ble Tar u n Agar w ala J. Mr. Tanveer Alam Khan, the learned counsel for the appellant. Mr. Mohd. Matloob, the learned counsel for the respondent no.1. Mr. Arvind Vashishtha, the learned counsel for the respondent nno.3. In view of the concurrent finding of the court below holding that the land in question was acquired by the State Government under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act and thereafter the State Government sold it to the defendant, the court finds that no substantial question of law arises which requires consideration with regard to the relief of the possession to be given to the plaintiff. The appeal is dismissed. The dismissal of the appeal will, however, have no effect on the suit for declaration filed by the appellant. Dated: 24.6.2010 ( Taru n Agar w ala, J.) Nishant