IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.639 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.639 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.639 OF 2007 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.529 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.529 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.529 OF 2007 1. Rakesh Motiram Anna Reddy 2. Smt.Sharda Motiram Anna Reddy 3. Kum. Smita Motiram Anna Reddy .....Applicants. Vs. The State of Maharashtra .....Respondent. Mr.R.D.Suryavanshi, adv. for the Applicants. Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, APP for the Respondent/State. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : JUNE 13, 2007. DATE : JUNE 13, 2007. DATE : JUNE 13, 2007. P.C. 1. Heard Mr.Suryavanshi the learned counsel for the applicants and Mrs. Deshmukh the learned APP for the State. 2. Applicants, who are convicted for the offence punishable under Section 498A of the I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 3 years with fine seeks bail pending their appeals against the conviction and sentence. 3. Applicants were on bail during the trial and after conviction the trial Court has also suspended the execution of their sentence under Section 389 of the Cr.P.C. therefore, applicants are granted bail on same terms and conditions as before the trial court subject to their furnishing fresh bail bonds and depositing fine amount. [J.H.BHATIA, J.] [J.H.BHATIA, J.] [J.H.BHATIA, J.] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.529 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.529 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.529 OF 2007 1. Rakesh Motiram Anna Reddy 2. Smt.Sharda Motiram Anna Reddy 3. Kum. Smita Motiram Anna Reddy .....Appellants. Vs. The State of Maharashtra .....Respondent. Mr.R.D.Suryavanshi, adv. for the Appellants. Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, APP for the Respondent/State. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : JUNE 13, 2007. DATE : JUNE 13, 2007. DATE : JUNE 13, 2007. P.C. 1. Heard Mr.Suryavanshi the learned counsel for the appellants and Mrs. Deshmukh the learned APP for the State. 2. Admit. (J.H.BHATIA, J.) (J.H.BHATIA, J.) (J.H.BHATIA, J.)