IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN TUESDAY, THE 22ND DECEMBER 2009 / 1ST POUSHA 1931 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3278 of 2004(D) ----------------------------------------- REVN. PETITIONER(S): APPELLANT/ACCUSED: -------------------------------------------------------------------- N.GOPALAKRISHNAN, S/O. DR.KRISHNA KURUP, OTHAYAMANGALATH HOUSE, PANTHEERANKAVU P.O., PERUMANNA AMSOM, VELLAYIKODE DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT & STATE: -------------------------------------------------------------- 1. K.APPUTTY, S/O. CHANDUKUTTY, KURUNGOTTUMMAL HOUSE, PERUMANNA AMSOM, VELLAYIKODE DESOM, PANTHEERANKAVU P.O., KOZHIKODE TALUK. 2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR. JAYAKRISHNAN. ADV. SRI.P.S.SREEDHARAN PILLAI FOR R1 SRI.K.B.SAJEESH FOR R1 SRI.P.GOPINATH FOR R1 SRI.C.S.SUNIL FOR R1 SRI.P.R.SREEJITH FOR R1 SMT.C.G.PREETHA FOR R.1 THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.S.GOPINATHAN,J. ================ Crl.R.P . No. 3278 of 2004 ======================== Dated this the 22th day of December, 2009. O R D E R As against the concurrent finding of conviction and sentence for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act this revision petition was filed. 2. The revision petitioner now settled the matter along with 1st respondent, the complainant before the trial court and filed Crl. M.Appl.No.12241/08 seeking an order to compound the offence. Having heard either side, I find no reason to reject the petition. Hence the petition Crl.M.A No.12241/09 is recorded and the revision petitioner would stand acquitted under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act read with Section 320(6) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and set at liberty. The revision petition is disposed of as above. P.S.GOPINATHAN,JUDGE. mns