, 5 IN THE HIH COURI OF KAR ATI(I Ar BANJAORE DATED THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 1993 BE FORE THE HOW BE M, JUSTICE Y. HASKAR RA CI!I REVISION PTIFIJN NO. 3579 OP 1997 Between: K,’?, Subbanna, S/o. Ramapoc, aged about 65 years, Aricu1turist 0 resident of Mundigesara village, Sager Ia1, Shirnoga District ,, Petitioner (By Sri, R,V, Jayarakash, vocate) And: K,i, Koli ppa 5/a, Kai Huchanayeka, sqed nout 41 year, Ajricuituri st, re6iieIt of Tho adakoppa village, Mosanagar Taluk, Shimoga District, ,, Respondent , .2 —2- Cii], zievition Petition filed TI/s. 115 of CPC against the order dated 1.8.1997 passed in O.8.No. 436 of 1991 on the file of the Prl. Nuasift, Sagar. This Civil aevision Petition coming on for aission this day, the Court made the following: ORDER This is a revision filed oy the defencnnt assailing the order of court below aflo.ing aendeent pleaded by ti plaintiff/respondent. The plaintiff—res.iondent originally filed a suit Lot dtclaratirn and aJmctsn. ày the impugned IA he doug it for aendeent of the a t se’king de lara i i aid ssession instead o rj action, Ilz cou t b 13 a ba tnt .ae, aja n t 1 1 3. i fil It ô 1 zdc tat rigina su’t it ajf barr ad by im.t ‘a’ on, ) aref . een zt an’nt be granted. Ahether .ui t. arced by limitation or not will ne “3nsidered after trial, therefore .... 3 / therefore it cannot be ground for rejection of endment. Court below after considering entire material on record without prejudice passed the order. Hence, I find no reason to interfere, Petition stand dismissed, Sd/- Judge. R,By: cop, C.3y Z 7 isistant RgIt Court of Ka.ata - £inaiore—ô6() (SOt 4