1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3119/2005 (Vipin Thakore & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.) Date of Order :: 22.04.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr.P.R. Mehta, for the petitioners. Mr.Shyam Toshniwal on behalf of Mr.N.M. Lodha, Addl. Advocate Genera. Mr.Tarun Joshi, for the respondent. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In this case, the petitioners have prayed for direction to the respondents to keep reserve the 50% posts of Teacher Grade III out of 2336 posts according to the ratio for Banswara District. Further it is prayed that respondents may be restrained to fill up 50% of the 2336 posts which is kept reserve for TADA area. It is also prayed that respondents may be directed to consider the case of the petitioners for appointments on the post of Teacher Grade III on the basis of their place in the merit prepared for the district Banswara and during the pendency of the writ petition the entire 2336 posts reserved for the TADA area are filled in by the ST/SC candidates than the merit list prepared and appointments made in pursuance of this may be quashed upto the extent of 50% of the posts so reserved for general candidates. The petitioners are challenging the selection process, more so, they are resident of Banswara district and according to them 2336 vacancies were to be filled in at Banswara district as per prayer No.1. But upon perusal of advertisement, it appears that only 806 vacancies were advertised and thereafter additional vacancies were sent to the Public Service Commission for selection and in all 2 939 vacancies were advertised for Banswara District. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the process of selection has already been completed in the year 2005-06 itself. At present there is no vacancy in existence, so also, there is no stay in favour of the petitioners to kept vacancies vacant. Further it is submitted that for subsequent year the question of reservation up to 30% for the local general candidates is not accepted by learned Single Judge for subsequent selection and 186 writ petitions were dismissed while rejecting the same plea raised in this writ petition by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 14th March, 2008 and by aflux of time process of selection in the year 2005 was completed and there is no question of providing 50% posts as prayed by the petitioners, because first of all only 939 vacancies were advertised and petitioners assertion in the writ petition with regard to 2336 is totally wrong. So also, it is obvious from the facts that process of selection is completed by the respondents, therefore, no relief can be granted to the petitioners as prayed by them. As per judgment rendered in 186 writ petitions by Co-ordinate Bench, it has been held that no reservation for local general candidates can be made for Banswara district. In this view of the matter, no relief can be granted to the petitioners. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS),J. A.K. Chouhan/-