M.A. No. H Q 2004 /1. Budhram, S/o. Jagdev, aged about 31 years. / 2. Phulvati W/o. Budhuram, aged about 30 years. Both R/o. V111. Koragaon, Tahsil— Keshkal, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS o /Respondent’s' g Q71. Kunwar $ingh, S/o. Ramdhar, Occupatlon — Dr1ver, Caste—Kalar, R/o. Koragaon, Tahsil—Keshkal, Distt Bastar \QKXW Harlsh Chand Jam S/o Peeluram Ja1n Kalar R/ o V111 Eatagaon Thana Dhanora Tahsil—Keshkal, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) (Tractor owner) W a. 3. The New India Insurance Company, Branch — Jagdalpur (Bastar C.G.) $0‘w“ g0 c‘(\ Egto¥~o kk".. we} MISC. APPEAL U/S 173 OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACT OF 1988. Amount claimed before the tribunal. Rs.1f;§5,000/- Award Amount by the tribunal. Rs. Vi62,000/— Rs.171’,63,000/- Appeal Claim Value Berng aggrieved by award dtd 15x1 03 gassed by the Motor Accident Clauns Tribunal Jagdalpur, Bastar in clarm case no 228/2002 the apnellants named above beg to prefer this appeal on the followrng Facts 6p Groun 3 ds. 3) In View of 'lhe abave, a ‘ s’mnds dismissed. 4) Cppy of The award shall of cos‘l'. \ (Jusfice Vijay Kumari ShrivasfavaT Member Lok Adala‘r High Cour'f of Chha‘msgarh l BI lasnur' Shri Vivek (Sharma, counsel Phulvafiu Divisional u . Shri KL Daswani, Company Limifed wifh Shri Sudhir N03). " ‘ None for respondems No.1 (34 In farms of compromise, awar 1)‘ Tribunal, respondeni No.3vshali pay Thousand) To The appeilan‘i’s 2) For disbursemenT of amounT The raTIo accepTed by The Tribunal shall ollow 7 Sd/- for- ‘i'he appellan'l's Budhram and Manager, New India Insurance Agrawal, counsel for responden‘i' 2. d is passed as below :- In addifion To compensaTion already awarded by The Rs.63,000/- (Rupees sixTy Th ree ppeal againsT respondenTs No.1 & 2 ‘ be given To boTh The parTies free/ ‘ “Member: Lok AdalaT High CourT of ChhaTTisgarh Bilaspur W€§W XLHC-22 Wily; TWW WT m (,a Wan-g W m W wan Wis; 31m mm Hf‘aa who)?W g igéiw mW W LOK AD 07.05. 2006