1 SB Civil Writ Petition No.447/2009 Ganshyam & Anr. vs. Kishan Lal. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.447/2009 Ganshyam and another. vs. Kishan Lal. Date : 25.2.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.S Saruparia, for the petitioners. Dr.S Acharya, for the respondent. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioners' prayer to summon the alleged settlement deed which according to the court below was deed of partition was rejected by the court below by the impugned order dated 26.11.2008. Perused the document, copy of which has been placed on record as Annex.P/3, and looking to the fact that the petitioners are claiming title by virtue of the said deed Annex.P/3, therefore, the document could have been admitted in evidence only if it would have been registered document. 2 SB Civil Writ Petition No.447/2009 Ganshyam & Anr. vs. Kishan Lal. For other purposes also, I do not find any evidentary value of the document, particularly for the plea of adverse possession, because if the document Annex.P/3 is looked into, then this nowhere allows the petitioners to take the plea of adverse possession as the petitioners' case is that they are in possession by virtue of Annex.P/3 and admittedly the said document has been executed by Kishan Lal who allowed the possession of the petitioners. In view of the above, this writ petition, having no merits, is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya