^-<*"; & W THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BUASPUR Wnt Pedtioa No.62A1 /2006 PETmONER ! f ...<^> '.r- -j;,-' _,, ^^f'^ ^•^(^ ^^s^" iy \.'" ^-'^ ^^...-- y RESPONDENTS l^ l^ Rajeg^Ram Nai^V|< S/o Shri Dukfaaa Na^ftK Aged about 30 years, Caste- Qhasi (S.C.), Occupation- Unemployed, R/o Railway Qr. No. 1293/7, Bilaapur (C.Q.). Vanua- 1. 8oufh Eastean Central Railway, Throu^i ita Geaeral Btonager, Bflaapur (C.O. 2. South Easteam Railway, Tbrough it»Geaeral Manager, Qardcaireach, KoUanta (W.B.). 3. DnriaionalSecurityCunuaiaaioner,, R. P. F. South Eaata-a Railway, Bttaapur. H WRTT FETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OP THE coNsrmjTioN OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE op A wRrr OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMU8 OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR DIRECTION TO DO JU8TICE IN THE MATTER. M\ i^>l^i-->^"^ (-J HISH COURT OF CHHATnSSARH AT BILASPUR, Writ Petition No. 6224 of 2006 Petitioner Rajesh Ram Nayak Versus Respondents South Eastern Central Stailway and others Sirgle Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justica Satish K. Agnihotri. PrBse.nf· AAr. K.K. Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. None appears for the rsspondents. Oft DER Oaassed on 19th Day of January. 2007) Tlie following order of the Court was jwssed by Satish K. kri. J. 1. The petitioner belongs to Scheduled Caste. He made on appiication for cppointment on tiie post of Constable in the Railway Protection For'ce in +he year 1997. Admittedly, the petitioner was successfu! in the written examination. Thereafter, the petitioner was required to appear for physica! test. The petitioner was not found fit in the medical de-categorization fitness test and as such, the petitioner could not be ^pointed on -the post of Constable in the Railway Protection Force. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition for seeking an afternative appointment in view of the circular, which is mentioned in Chcpter 7 u / at para 14 of the Raitway Service Rules and Labour Law Code, and reads as under:- 14. ?97?sy ^ «7W7W yitnr yfW vcff m^ d^fl^H : wj. unfir w sj^^ff u/-^u///& ^ \S^!)^H ujf f^ ^^ vi^f ^ ycfrffr f^sft fiyfv v^ ^ f^y ^ ufr^ f ^fivf uR y- > _)- ^w ff^v w ^ f^v ?w?sy ^ sjwf vr u^' ^y 'aidT f c^ f^ff wf7 vy ^ /^v Km^ ^y %• T^IW ^ ff^ ^ ^ ST ffafr w y^ w WfSfcf V^ ^St ^^ f aW ^St ^f yr f^n uir-fT s^ivr t. fgiy^ew ^ ^if^nif ^ ssl^-f ijw^ eitl^iw sftwrr gna gw f^ii wfr-iT ^if^si i f^^ ^ vwv ^. fvfi.^t.A) sa ^t. w- i/2/13 25.11.19S8, 4- (W:^f.^.) ^. W. 1/2/13 10.S.19S9 Sf7 76-^. (W.fn.^.) 15/S f^-fT^ 13.2.1978 ^ 3fJffKJ ^dt Vfff ^ ^ JST ^?<T 4~ wvi^i vf ^ swifSpsf ^f W^f W^fff Vf ^ ^f ^ ?awr W •^' ^ia^ ^f^ ^w WR ^ ^ ^g^ QW /?.^^ ^ ^i^ i^-^ ^T^y ;?? rgy tS^iRd vf f^ ^g ssv^ fiyt^ ®/§<wy^ wipfff WfSlST Vf ^ ^aft^JV VPff ^^ f SWcT / I ^Wq^ ^ 4' y^fT ^S^ yf^ ^f 4^ ufiy i [ta^ ^f^ vsfy /. fw.^.^.} 74 ^t. W. /S/37 /5-y/flE' 5&& /fl7.? ^ sr^vrf] 3. The circular is not a part of rute. It provi'des for appointment on alternatjye post, where the candidate is medicaily un-fit. Circular simply provides that Senerol Manager may consider appointment in cny other department w~here ttie reserved vacancy is available. The circuiar i's not in the na-hire of mwdatory direction, but it is at the discretion of General Manager, keeping in view avaikibility of suitoble post in reserved category to appoint in <any other post. The petitioner hos not pointed out availability of any post wherein, the case of the petitioner could be considered. It is algo not pointed out that the GeneraS Manager has deciined to exercise his discretionary power, arbitrariiy and whimsically. Thus, no direction can be issued to the (Seneral Mcmager to exercise his discretionary power in favour of the petitioner, where the petitioner has no indefeasible right to appointment. 4. Be that as it may, by virtue of this cir'cular, tiie petitioner has no right to tiie post. The petitioner cannot ctaim that any Segal right, in view of tiie circular. has accrued in his favour, which may be enforced by tiiis Court. » 'f 5. In view of the above stated facts, there is no sembhnce of any »right. The petition is devoid of merit. Thus, this writ petition is accordingiy dismissed. No order as to costs. _ ._ Subhash Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotti Judge