Item No.11. DJ/- SBCWP NO. 7185/2010 Jaswant Singh Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. Order dt: 04th August, 2010 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7185/2010 Jaswant Singh Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. DATE OF ORDER ::: 04th August, 2010 P R E S E N T HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. Manoj Bhandari, for the petitioner. --- 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that reason assigned in the impugned order rejecting candidatre of the petitioner for appointment the post of Prabodhak vide Annex-7 dated 14.07.2010 that the petitioner did not possess five years continuous teaching experience for appointment on the post of Prabodhak after acquiring the qualification of B. Ed. Examination is incorrect because the required qualification for appointment on the post of Prabodhak, was only Senior Secondary, which the petitioner already possessed and he had more than five years teaching experience as such. However, the petitioner's candidature has wrongly been rejected. The impugned order though titled as 'Speaking Order', however, really does not deal with the relevant facts and circumstances of the case of the petitioner and legal position; for which the judgments have already been pronounced by this Court. Item No.11. DJ/- SBCWP NO. 7185/2010 Jaswant Singh Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. Order dt: 04th August, 2010 2/2 3. Considering the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is once again relegated back to the said authority by making fresh representation giving all the contentions, which he has raised here in this petition, and the said authority is expected to pass a speaking order again in accordance with law. It is also expected that if the petitioner is found eligible and entitled to the relief claimed by him, the same may be given to him, but if the petitioner is still not found eligible after dealing with all contentions of the petitioner, the authority concerned shall pass appropriate speaking order, preferably within three weeks from the date of such representation filed along with certified copy of this order, and if any adverse order is passed against the petitioner, the petitioner will be free to avail the legal remedy under the law. 4. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Copy of this order be sent to respondents immediately. (DR. VINEET KOTHARI), J. DJ/- 11