a- ^ a 03 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR rC.G.1 WRIT PETITION N0. i-^ 13/2005 PETITIONER < Ashok Kumar Gupta son of Shri Nohar Prasad Gupta, aged about 30 years, resident of village Masanki, Village Panchayat Karwan, block Orgi, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surguja [C.G.] VERSUS RESPONDENTS /" 1] ^ 4] L State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary Panchayat and Social Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur [C.G.] The Cpllector, Ambikapur, District Surguja [C.G.]. Sub Divisional Officer. [Revenue], Surajpur, District Surguja [C.G.] The Deputy Director, Panchayat and Social Welfare Department, Ambikapur, District Surguja [C.G.]. g^- The Chief Executive ^^^??( Janpad Panchayat/ Orgi, District Surguja [C.G.] Sarpanch Village Panchayat Karwan, Block Orgi, District Surguja [C.G.] WRIT PE-RIZIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. \ fc^>"3^ ....v-k?§.^'^ &.'-":"^-^"....---"""^ / .^>'!''"'.:.--;'(:i;i • 5] 'i^^M'^'^ i) XI-HC-78 <TFT^T^<TT^ \5-&ci ^AWW^, WT[[W\<£>,RlOW^ .vJ.P.^fi».l.U^..\°^. •nil»JbBntnBn«1Tnli«itn«> •!•j^h u • ^a • ••• n • n a N ^200 OT^^T^lf^TT^ ^TS1T3TT^^T^Ht^ A. l ^fi^iV^L- ^ /-^ 3TT^?T q?q? ((Jclijdc£[) ^PTTW ^?fi?T 3TT^^T 21.4.2005 Shri V.K. Pandey,counsel Shri Bhaskar Pyasi, Pane^ Heard learned coun^ei f^ The pel-itioner's petitior| Panchaypt Karmi and thereaft However, in the year 2003 the ^j wi^Ic'xil^ ^i+ic^T'^'fe^t^Fji^-di^ ^3Tf^R'3:n^'^T year 2004 the S'ram Sabha pas^jed a resoJution for appointment of the petitioner as Panchcyat Secretary but r obeying that resoSution and no^ petjfioner m<sy be aliowed to m be directed to decide the re| leorned counsel for respondent] Having heard learned c^ facts and circumstancesofthe] repre^entation to re^pondent for the petitioner. Lavyyer for respondent No.l to 4 / State. r the pQrtie^. is that in the year 1995 he was appointed QS sr, he was Qppointed as Panchayat Secretary. ctitioner was removed from the services. In the sspondent No.S-Chief Executive Officer i^ not issuing the appointment order in favour of the petitionep. In the circumstances/ ie^rned counsel for the petltioner submits that the 3ke a representation to respondent No<5 and he are^entation in accordance with law, to which No.l to 4 hcis no objection. un^el for the porties ond hovsn9 r^ard to the case, the petitioner Is allowed to make a detailed ^o.5 within ten doy^ from today raising all hi^ grievance^ anct in turn respond^nt no.5 i^ directed to decide the representation of the petitioner in an objecjl-jve monner within a period of 15 days after con5iderin9 ail the points rdsec| by the petitioner in accordance with iaw. With the above directioil Consequen+ly, I.A. No.2^ Certified copy as per rui| !, the petition stands disposed of. 23/05 a!so stands disposed of,^ ^s. ^l- ^^' .c. A°° ^^