IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 10939 of 2006 Between: A.Nagarjuna Reddy, s/o Ratna Reddy, rep., by its GPA Holder Mr.Udaya Shanker Navani, s/o G.S.Navani, aged 34 years, Occ:Business, r/o 3-1-70, Kodangal Road, Tandur, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Forest Range Officer, Mohammadabad Range, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Forest Range Officer, Vikarabad Range, Ranga Reddy District. 3 The Divisional Forest Officer, (Territorial), Hyderabad Division, O/o the Principal Conservator of Forests, M.J.Market, Hyderabad. 4 The Assistant Director, Mines & Geology, Tandur, Ranga Reddy District. 5 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Pudur Mandal, R.R.District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondents 1 to 3 in coming to the mining operations site of the petitioner in Sy.No.2 of Rakamcherla Village, Pudur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and orally directing stoppage of mining operations for which lease has been granted by the Government vide G.O.Ms.No.392, Industries, & Commerce (Mines- I) Department dated 16-12-1999 and the lease granted by the fourth respondent vide his proceedings No.3416/M2/98, dated 29-12-1999 as arbitrary and illegal and without any authority of law and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 not to interfere with the mining operations of the petitioner in Sy.No.2 of Rakamcherla Village, Pudur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.SATYAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR FORESTS The Court made the following : ORDER: When W.P.M.P.No.8912 of 2008 for condonation of delay of 579 days in filing the review W.P.M.P. has come up, the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner, Sri M.Ram Mohan Reddy, says that he wants to withdraw the writ petition. In view of the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn and it is needless to mention that all the interim orders passed by this Court earlier shall stand vacated. No order as to costs. __________________ 03rd February, 2009 SKM