^* <TPTC5T^»TT^ ^wT ^KI io>^, IPTTI^I-'KA, Rrti^y _;_<<^/ c-c. ^(5.3^^ 3TT^?T tWP (ljc|ij6|<g) ^20 3H^^TcpTR^Jcb <:CT3n^$Td>^l<h ?^TTSR^Tf^T3TT^$T APPLICANT Suyiideve T.D. aged abo( (wesf), R/o Fore| Dist-Noilth RESPONDENTS State of cpi<ifo41^t +ii+ioT^"fcl<3 ^Rn^-cK <R 3rf^T 3Tlt$T S/o Lt, Shri Govinda Suklideve, Lit 55 years, Siib-Divisional OfiBcer, Kapsi Shaiiupratapur (west) Forrest Uivision, st Colouy, DaUi Road, Bhaaupratapur, Baster (Kanker) C.G. Chhattisgarh fhrough the Secretary, Forest pepart.mient, Distt-KaJ|pur (CG) D.PLS. Bhawan, Raipzir, 2. The Di\1 (West) (kaiiker) 3. Chhattisj aiid Devd throiigh Aiiupam| /1. G.R, R| Conserv^ Baster (I| 5. Elcction Secretai^j Dehli-lll 6. Chief El Bhaaupratpur Norfh Baster lisional Forest Officer, ?orest Division, Distt. P.G. ^arh State Mraor Foresti Produce(Tradiag |lopmerit) Cooperative Federatiou Limited [ts Managitig Dircctor, Hcad Officc, J-10, |Nagar, DisttRaipur (CG) ^itliiya, Deputy Maiiaging Director, [tor Officer, Kanker Circle, Distt-North |£u.iker)C.G. Coniniission of India, throiigh its Nrrvachaii Sadaii, Ashoka Road, New \)00t ^ctoral.. Officer, State of Chhattisgarh, SB: HQN. DHIRENDRA ^ 06^11,2908 Shri Kasif Shakeel, coun^ ShriY.S. Thakm', Dy. Ad\ Shri A.S. Gali-arwar, com| Inclrawat|i Khaiid, MarLtralaya Parisar, Raipur (CG-) AISHRA,J .e.1 for tlie applicaiit. /ocate GeneraJ for the State. isel for the respondents No. 5 & 6. ,,rfS^ ,,^ 1I ^ M y / ^ ^EET '-qi^icxi, u>-al^-i<i<»,RlriKI^ WKiT JSW ^...&..^...^.ff.;...3..4.%.... ^200% 3TT^9T q^cf»(^rf^cT^) 3TT^^Tc}5Tf^TTcp ^HOT^^TSPHtcp 1 'a't ^l BT^TW ^Tf^T 3TT^$T lypographical error fhat has cp|<tlo^lv1411^oV^?fcL<3 1<Rl^l^ ^3Tf^T3TT^$T Heanl. The nistaD^t applicatio^i has been filed for correction of crept in the order dated 23.10.2008 passed m W.P.(S) No.5987/0|8, whereby fhe respondent No,l was directed to decide fhe pendmg |reprcsentation offhe petitioner withia a period of fhree weeks. Howe^er, madvertenUy due to typographical error, "thrce oionths^ in. place c| appean|ig Leamed counsel above typographical error ui] coiTected as in fact, fhe decide fhe representation of \ weeks, aad not thrce months. respo^dent In view of above, fhe p 23.10.2008 is modi&ed to tt ffhree weeks" has been typed. for the respondents submit fb.at the ftie oider dated 2.3.10.2008 may be No. 1 was directed to consider aiid iie petitioner withui a period of three stition is atlowed aad fhe order dated e extent fhat the typographical error present ui the last two parag^-aphs of flie above order, whereui the time-fraiae to decide fhe r^presentation is mentioned as tffliree months" be read as "three weel^ A copy of this order No.5987/08 aad suppUedwith] :s"? ia place thereof. |3e placed in the records of W.P.(S) the copy oforder dated 23.10.2008. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge