1 pil193.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 193 OF 2010 Chintaman Raghunath Gharat & Anr. ..Petitioners Vs. Uran Municipal Council & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Suresh M. Sabrad for the Petitioners. Mr. Sachin Shetye i/by Mr.S.R. Ganbavale for Respondent No.1. Mr. P.K. Deshmukh for Respondent No.2. Mr. R.P. Behare, AGP for Respondent No.3. CORAM : P.B. MAJMUDAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 27TH JANUARY , 2011. P.C. The grievance of the petitioners is that even though the permission for repairs was granted, respondent No.2 demolished the entire structure and is now starting new construction. The learned Counsel for the Council states that the grievance of the petitioners will be looked into and appropriate orders will be passed according to law. The learned Counsel for the Council further states that the statement of the petitioners is not correct that the respondent No.2 is carrying out further construction. If the respondent No. 2 pil193.10.sxw 2 wants to start construction it shall apply for proper sanction and it is for the Corporation to decide whether such sanction can be granted or not. 2. In view of the statement of learned Counsel for the Council, the petition is disposed of. ( A.A. SAYED, J. ) (P.B. MAJMUDAR, J.)