Cr.M.P.(M) No. 1318 of 2008 24.12.2008 Present: Mr. G.D. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Addl. A.G. for the respondent. It is submitted by the learned Senior Additional Advocate General on the basis of instructions imparted to him by S.I. Shri Rattan Lal that custody of the petitioner is not required in the present case. Consequently, the application is allowed on the same terms and conditions as contained in the previous order dated 19.12.2008. Mr. G.D. Sharma submits that his client and Ms. Reena Kumari are present in person. He further submits that Ms. Reena Kumari has given statement under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure that she has married the petitioner due to her own volition. He lastly contended that the members of the family of Ms. Reena Kumari along with certain residents of the area are against the inter-caste marriage and he apprehends that the petitioner and his wife can be harmed physically. Accordingly, the Senior Superintendents of Police, Shimla and Solan are directed to ensure that the petitioner and his wife Ms. Reena Kumari are escorted to the place of their choice by providing a sufficient number of police force. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Solan is further directed to ensure that no physical harm is caused to the petitioner or his wife. Copy ‘Dasti’. (Rajiv Sharma), J. December 24, 2008. (cr)