IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44646 of 2009 RAMDEO YADAV, Son of late Faujdar Yadav Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18.12.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147/148/149/302 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act. It has been submitted that the petitioner and three sons have been made an accused for the murder of his patidar and the motive that has been alleged is that the deceased had left the organization of people war group (naxal group) which the accused persons represented. The submission is that the petitioner did not belong to Maoist outfit and in fact this occurrence has taken place on account of the fact that the deceased was veteran criminal and accused in as many as thirteen cases and it was a blind murder and the petitioner is agnate and has been roped on account of village politics. Further submission is that there is no specific overt act against them. Under the circumstances, let the petitioner 2 above named, who is in custody since 31.3.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Jehanabad in connection with Kako P.S.case No. 98 of 2008, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his released in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse (iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iv) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Spd/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)