cp453.10 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________ CONT. PETITION NO. 453 OF 2010 ,In WP/2051/2009 POPAT NATTHU PAWAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS ... Advocate for Petitioner(s) : Mr.S N Rodge AGP for Respondent(s): Mr.D.V. Tele. Advocate for Respondent(s) : Mr. Pahune Patil Nandkishor J. Adv for R/2 ... CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. Dated: August 12, 2011 ... Heard learned Counsel for petitioner, and learned Counsel for respondents and the learned AGP for State. 2 It is not in dispute that the application of the petitioner for rental compensation has been finally decided and even rental compensation has been disbursed to the petitioner. 3 It is true that such direction / order of the Division Bench should have been complied with by the respondents within four months from 8th cp453.10 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________ April, 2009. It is the submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner that respondent No.2 issued letter to the respondent No.3 asking him to redress the grievance raised by the petitioner. The learned Counsel for the respondent No.2 submits that in fact, such application was decided within the stipulated period of four months as directed by the Division Bench of this Court. 4 Since the rental compensation is paid to the petitioner and application has been decided, in my opinion, nothing further survives for consideration in this Contempt Petition. The respondents, in their affidavits, have also tendered unconditional apology for the delay, if any. 5 The Supreme Court in case of Suresh Chandra Poddar vs. Dhani Ram and others [(2002) 1 SCC 766] has taken a view that even where the order of court is complied with, subsequent to receipt of notice of contempt, court should show judicial grace and magnanimity cp453.10 3 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________ in dealing with action for contempt. 6 In that view of the matter, the grievance of the petitioner is redressed. Therefore, no further action is warranted in this contempt petition. The contempt Petition stands disposed of. Notice stands discharged. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) PLK/*