THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P.No.24734 OF 2010 ORDER: The present writ petition has been filed aggrieved by a show-cause notice issued by the respondent calling upon the petitioner herein as to why he be not bring the building in conformity with the sanctioned plan. This notice has proceeded on the basis that the writ petitioner is carrying on commercial activity. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present activity does not amount to carrying on commercial activity and hence he is not required to comply with any of the provisions. Whether the writ petitioner is actually carrying on commercial activity or not is dependant upon the facts which he will have to present before the respondents. The respondent in the impugned show-cause notice have clearly pointed out that a commercial activity is going on. Therefore, it is for the petitioner to satisfy the respondents as to why the activity carried on by him does not answer the description of the commercial activity and it is wholly permissible to carry on such an activity in a residential area/zone. Till such time the respondents receive a detailed representation to be submitted by the petitioner herein within a maximum period of fifteen days from today, and passing final orders duly dealing with the objections raised in the said representation, no coercive measures should be initiated against the petitioner by way of removal or demolition of the structures. With the consent of the learned Standing Counsel Smt.Kalpana Ekbote, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. --------------------------------- Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J knk 4th October 2010