IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No. 13214 of 2006 MUNESHWAR PRASAD, SON OF PRABHU DAYAL SINGH, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- DURGA NAGAR, POLSON, DIGHA GHAT, P.S.- DIGHA, DISTRICT – PATNA. ..... PETITIONER Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, REGIONAL OFFICE, EMPLOYEE’S PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, SERPENTINE ROAD, R. BLOCK, PATNA, BIHAR. 2. THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER (PENSION), REGIONAL OFFICE, EMPLOYEE’S PROVIDENT ORGANISATION, SERPENTINE ROAD, R. BLOCK, PATNA, BIHAR. ........... RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 25.04.2011 Heard Sri Sanjay Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ranjeet Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 1 & 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file representation before the competent authority. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner has not been refuted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents. In view of stand taken by the parties, there is no need to further keep the writ petition pending. The writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file representation before the competent authority. The writ petition stands disposed of. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)