IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1817 of 2008 RANA PRATAP SINGH Versus BIRENDRA KUMAR SINGH & ORS ----------- 2 10/11/2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court the impleadment of intervener Ravindra Singh as a co-plaintiff in an eviction suit by the impugned order does not amount to any jurisdictional error so as to be interfered by this Court in exercise of its revisional power under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The suit property in question in an eviction suit, as a matter of fact, being in the name of the aforesaid intervener on whose behalf the plaintiff had originally filed the eviction suit by clearly stating facts in the plaint explaining that the intervener is the owner and is in military service. Impleadment of such intervener thus having been only allowed by the impugned order as a co-plaintiff, did not cause either any prejudice or surprise to the defendant-petitioner. The impugned order therefore cannot be said to bad or vitiated on any score so 2 as to warrant interference by this Court in exercise of power under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure. There being thus no merit in this application, the same is hereby dismissed. ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J. ) Abhay Kumar