ssp 1 RPWL 68 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.68 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2496 OF 2011 Mahesh Digamber Naik .....Petitioner versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and Anr. ..... Respondents Mr.Atul Damle, for the petitioner. Ms.P.A.Purandare, for the respondent No.1. Ms.Smita Gaidhani, AGP, for the respondent No.2. CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE: 13 th DECEMBER, 2011 P.C. 1. Rule. 2. The respective Advocates waive service on behalf of the respondents. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we modify our original order dated 21st November, 2011 by holding that the respondent-Corporation shall maintain existing status quo till the stay application is decided or for a period of three weeks which ever is later, meaning thereby that in case the say application is not decided within a period of three weeks, the existing status quo to be maintained till the stay application is decided, as it is pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner that till today, the stay application has not been decided. The ssp 2 RPWL 68 of 2011 original order. Accordingly, the original order stands modified in this review order as indicated above and it is held that status quo shall continue to operate till the stay application is decided. 3. Rule is accordingly made absolute to the aforesaid extent. ( MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.)