IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46167 of 2007 NUNU JHA @ DHANANJAY JHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR - - - - 5. 25.8.2008 Heard. The petitioner’s name dies not figure as an accused in the F.I.R. which is against unknown. The informant has stated in the F.I.R. that the criminals had concealed their identification by putting Galmochha over their faces. In the case diary one witness Kaushal Kumar, who is said to be the brother-in-law of the informant, has stated in paragraph 7 that he had identified this petitioner Nunu Jha alias Dhananjay Jha as amongst the criminals. The contention is that, firstly, there was no factual data available as to on what basis the identification has been claimed and secondly, the informant and the said witness Kaushal Kumar were traveling by the same vehicle and it was expected of the said Kaushal Kumar to have divulged the name of the petitioner to the informant prior to the lodging of the case. Regard being had to the facts, let the 2 above named petitioner be directed to be released from custody on his furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura, in Puraini P.S.Case No. 63 of 2006. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)