1 41 caf.1487.11 ndm FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1487 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 521 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Ms. Rita Punjwani i/b Mr. Prem S. Gidwani for the Applicant. Mr. Snehal Shah, Ms. Mahek Bookwala, Satyen Vora and A.T.Suryawanshi i/b M/s.Markand Gandhi and Company for the Respondents. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 25 th April, 2011. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant. 2 The Applicant is the Respondent in the first appeal, who is the original plaintiff. There is a decree for perpetual injunction passed against the Respondents. Admittedly, this Court has not granted stay of the execution of the said decree. Even assuming that the Respondents have committed breach of the decree of perpetual injunction, remedy of the Applicant is to execute the decree in accordance with law. Prayer for appointment of the Receiver cannot be considered in an appeal preferred by 2 41 caf.1487.11 the Respondents. Accordingly, the application is disposed of by granting the liberty to the Applicant to take out appropriate proceedings in accordance with law. [ A.S.OKA, J ]