IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 452 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 20th January, 2011. Rajinder Singh Petitioner through Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents through Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner–farmer whose land has been acquired by the State of Punjab for respondent No. 3–Company, is aggrieved by the action of the Land Acquisition Collector in deducting the Tax at Source at the time of depositing the amount of compensation but not releasing the TDS certificates in his favour. Learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the issue involved in this case is squarely covered in favour of the petitioner by a decision of this Court in CWP No. 194 of 2010 [Nar Singh v State of Punjab & Ors.] dated 5th October, 2010. In this view of matter, this writ petition is disposed of in the same terms as in Nar Singh's case [supra]. The necessary refund shall be made to the petitioner within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is received. Disposed of. Dasti. January 20, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE