'24 ¥• HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH. B1LAS3PVR Writ PetttioalSI No.5919/20(y7 Petitioaer RESPOHDENTS 1. 2. 3. Shriram Dewaagaa, s/o Shri Babu Lal Dewaugaa a%ed about 45 years, Assistant Teachcr, Govt. Primaiy School- Siladchi, Block Bamlmidih, District Janjgir Champa(CG} .' Versus Statc of CbhattisgaA, through fhe Sccretary, Dcparttnent of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G) District Education aSRcer, Distt. Janjgir Chaaapa(CG) (C.G) Block Education offcer, Block Bannhiudih, Distt. Janjgir Champa(C.O) Wrlt peUtion under ArUcle 226 afthe ConstituUoa of India Appearance: Shri A.S.Rajput, counscl for fhe Pettdonca-. Shri Ajay Dwlvedi, Panel Lawyer for fhe State/ respondents on advauce copy ORAL ORDER (2S.9.2007) SunU Kumar Sinha, J. Leamed couasel appeanng for thc petitloner as also for the State/respondents jointfy subinlt that thc facte and qucstion of law involved in the present writ petition are squarely covered by tfae decision of this Coitrt ia case of Yeishwant S.usnnr Bhtureidwa/ -va- Munfetpal Co»poratton, Durg «*nd anather rcported in SKW6 (If SSPJR CG96. In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ petition (S) No.5862 of 2006 (Hemaat Kumar Vishwakarma Vs. State qf. WP(S)5919/2007 Chhatdsgarh and ofhers) aad ofher connected matter, decided by fhis Court on 12.12.2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28.1.1995, issued by fhe Secretaiy, Boaid of Secoudaiy Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Diploma iu Eklucation Examination, it was clartfied ttiat thc noiuenclature of the Basic Traiuing Institute i.e. B.T.I., has been changed and renaaied as Diploina in Education i.e., D.Ed. Accordiagly, the D.Ed,, certificate holders are also covered by the decision iu W.P.(S) No.5862/2006 (Hemant Kumar VishwcikcaTna-vs- Staie of C.G& others (supra). For fhe aforementioned reasons, the writ petition M disposed of m tenas of fhe decision of ttus Court in fhe matter of Yashwant Kumar Bhardwaj (suprc^, subject to verification of fhe fact as to whether the pctitioner has acquired D.Ed. certificate at his own expenses as per the circular dated 24.12.1998 & 01.3.1999 aad fttrther whefher he has been paid advance iucreinents or not The pettdon stands finally disposed of No order as to costs. —»— \ Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge sunita