1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 459 OF 2010 (Tilakraj Adku Gedam & Anr. vs. Sou. Pravinda Suryabhan Mendhe & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. FEBRUARY 03, 2010. Heard Shri Mundra, learned counsel for the petitioners. By effecting consequential amendment in relation to admitted sale deed dated 31.07.1996, the respondents – defendants have added certain pleas which are according to the petitioners/ plaintiffs, inconsistence with the story earlier pleaded. The trial Court has noticed this and observed that the earlier story has not been withdrawn by the respondents / defendants. It is, therefore, obvious that the trial Court was alive to the situation and has passed the impugned order. There is no perversity or jurisdictional error. No case is made out warranting any interference in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. JUDGE *GS.