IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9123/2008 {Mrs. Ritu Gambhir & Others Versus The State of Rajasthan & Others} Date of Order :: 4th September, 2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Mr. Arun Kumar Bhandari for the petitioners BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for th petitioners. 2. The petitioners have preferred this writ petition challenging the impugned order dated 20th June, 2006 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.1, Jaipur City, Jaipur rejecting the revision petition of the petitioners against the order dated 1st June, 2007 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) & Judicial Magistrate No.11, Jaipur City, Jaipur taking cognizance against the petitioners for the offence under Section 323, 147 and 149 IPC. It is correct that after dismissal of revision petition preferred by the accused, the second revision petition is barred under-subsection (3) of Section 397 Cr.P.C., but if order passed by both the courts below are patently illegal or without jurisdiction -2- or there is abuse of process of law, then the said orders can be challenged by way of petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. but instead of filing the said petition, the petitioners have preferred this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution. It is settled law that jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 and 227 cannot be invoked where the petitioners have an alternative remedy against the impugned order. 3. In view of above, I am of the view that present writ petition is liable to be dismissed only on the ground of alternative remedy available to the petitioners and the same is, accordingly, dismissed in limine. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. DK