IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN FRIDAY, THE 3RD DECEMBER 2010 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 RCRev..No. 50 of 2008() ----------------------- RCA.11/2006 of RENT CONTROL APPELLATE AUTHORITY , PARAVUR RCP.6/2004 of MUNSIFF COURT, PARAVUR .................... REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/PETITIONER. ------------------------------------------ 1. CHRISTURAJA JANA SAHAYA SANGHAM, REG.NO. E.R.66/71, MADAPLATHITHURUTH MURI, MOOTHKUNNAM VILLAGE, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CLEETUS, S/O.LOUVIS, PARAKKAT, MADAPLATHITHURUTH MURI, MOOTHKUNNAM VILLAGE. 2. TREASURER, JOHN, S/O.VAREETH, KANAPPILLY HOUSE, MADAPLATHITHURUTH MURI, MOOTHKUNNAM VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.BABU KARUKAPADATH SMT.M.A.VAHEEDA BABU RESPONDENT(S): APPELLANT/RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------ RAPHEL, AGED 43 YEARS, KATTUPARAMBIL HOUSE, MADAPLATHITHURUTH KARA, MOOTHAKUNNAM VILLAGE PARAVUR TALUK. ADV. SRI.DINESH R.SHENOY FOR R1 SRI.V.V.UNNIKRISHNAN FOR R1 THIS RENT CONTROL REVISION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 3 /12/2010 , THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. ------------------------ R.C.R.No. 50 OF 2008 ------------------------ Dated this the 3rd day of December, 2010 O R D E R Pius C.Kuriakose, J. Noticed the not pressed memo filed by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner. In view of that memo, the revision petition is dismissed as not pressed. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE dpk