IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 2275 of 2005 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 04/02/2005 in WP NO : 26456 OF 2003 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 The State of Andhra pradesh, rep.by its Secretary, Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The Commissioner & Director of School Education Hyderabad 3 The District Educational Officer, Nellore District ..... APPELLANT(S) AND 1 D.Suryakala Mukhi D/o. D.Dakshnamurhty Alluripet Nellore District 2 S.V.U.P. School,. rep.by its Correspondent, Allur, Nellore District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent No.1: MR. BOKKA SATYANARAYANA The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL No.2275 OF 2005 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A.Gopal Reddy) This appeal is directed against the interim orders passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.M.P.No.1267 of 2005 in W.P.No.26456 of 2003, dated 04.02.2005 directing the respondents to pay the salary to the writ petitioner from 23.7.2003 till date pending the writ petition. Admittedly, the writ petitioner was working with S.V.U.P. School-2nd respondent herein and the Correspondent of the school had to submit the salary bill on reinstatement of the writ petitioner into service pursuant to the order passed by this court in W.P.M.P.No.32350 of 2003, dated 08.12.2003. Since on such salary bill is being submitted, the oﬃcials of the Government are under obligation to pass the said bill if it is in accordance with law. In view of the same, the Government have not aggrieved by the impugned order as they are not under obligation to pay the salary unless the salary bill of the writ petitioner is submitted by the Correspondent of the school and the same has to be paid by the oﬃcials in accordance with the rules and if the same is liable to be paid as per the existing Rules. Therefore, we do not see any ground to entertain the writ appeal. The Writ Appeal is accordingly dismissed. We are informed that the writ petition is listed for hearing. It is always open for the writ petitioner to move the learned single judge for appropriate relief namely; for submission of the salary bills of the writ petitioner by the Correspondent of the second respondent school for enabling the D.E.O. to make payment of the amount from out of the amount payable to the school from Grant-in-Aid. The Writ Appeal is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. ________________ A. GOPAL REDDY, J. ______________________ 30th SEPTEMBER, 2008 VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J. Tsr. Copy to 1 The Secretary, Education Department, State of Andhra pradesh, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The Commissioner & Director of School Education Hyderabad 3 The District Educational Officer, Nellore District 4.The G.P. for School Education, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 5. Two C.D. copies.