c . S- •lotf IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH^AT BIIASPUR W. P. (S) NQ. $'/ ^ OF 2011. PETITIONER .^^^; ^<^^^^<r' .^" ^- s<6&_t><' ..^:.-^^ ...^^ ...-••<'(A N(/ ^' ^'' \ /: Shivcharan Singh Parihar, S/o; Shri R. R. Singh Parihar, aged about 42 years, working as Reserve Inspector, Police Line, North Bastar Kanker, (C. G.) ^'" VERSUS 6 RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Principal Secretary, Department ofHome (Police), D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) ^r 2. The Director General ofPolice, Police Head Quarter Civil Lines Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Superintendent of Police, North Bastar Kanker, District North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: !^ As^given in the above cause title. ^*-'; a^~y ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRITPETITION rS)No. 5174 of2011 Shivcharan Singh Parihar VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Asnihotri, J. Present: Shri Sunil Pillai, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 5th day ofSeptember, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 11.7.2011 (Annexure P/2), the petitioner, working as Reserve Inspector has been transferred from Kanker to Korba on his own request. However, the petitioner has not yet. been relieved tojoin the new place ofposting. Learned counsel submits that once the order of transfer has been passed, it is for the Govemment to ensure that it is complied with immediately. Leamed counsel relies on a decision of the Supreme Court in Sreedam Chandra Ghosh v. State of Assam & others , in support of her contention that if the order is not complied with, a direction can be issued for enforcemerit thereof. 2. Shri Thakur, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State submits that that ifthe transfer order dated 11.7.2011 is still in existence and has not been complied with, appropriate steps would be taken to comply with the order. 3. Ifthe aforesaid transfer order is stillin existence, the Govemment is under an obligation to comply with the same at once. It is accordingly directed that the transfer order shall be complied with forthwifh, within a period oftwo weeks. ^- 4. ' Accordingly, this petition is disposed of. .^^gptt^ "^*0' Satis' jud&e ashok 1(1996)JOSCC567