1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. APPEAL NO.962 OF 2005 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2717 OF 2005 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1072 OF 2004 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.453 OF 2003 IN SUIT NO.1341 OF 1998 Ashok Mishrimal Parmar .. Appellant v/s. Jetu Jacques Taru Lalvani & ors. .. Respondents Mr.Bharat Manubandha i/by M/s.A.Bharat & Co. for the appellant. CORAM : R.M.LODHA AND D.G.KARNIK, JJ. DATED : 22nd December, 2005 P.C. Mr.Bharat Manubandha, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that parties have settled their dispute. He handed in the consent terms, marked "X" for identification purposes. 2. Though nobody appears for the respondent No.1, we find that the consent terms are signed by the respondent No.1 and also his advocate. 3. We, accordingly, dispose of the appeal in terms of the consent terms. No costs. (R.M. (R.M. (R.M. LODHA, J.) LODHA, J.) LODHA, J.) (D.G. (D.G. (D.G. KARNIK, J.) KARNIK, J.) KARNIK, J.)