IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6114 of 2007 Most.Bimla Devi, wife of Late Raghunandan Roy, resident of Village- Madhubani ( Rajendra Nagar), Police Station-K.Hatt, District-Purnea ----------------------------- Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Chairman, Bihar Electricity Board, Vidhyut Bhawan, Bihar,Patna 3. The General Manager-cum- Chief Engineer, Koshi Electric Supply Division, Saharsa 4. The Electric Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Katihar 5. The Electrical Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division,Purnea 6. The Account Officer, Purnea Electrical Circle , Purnea 7. The Treasury Officer, Purnea ------------------------ Respondents. ----------- 02 16-05-2011 Heard Sri Rahamtullah, learned counsel, who was assisted by Sri Md. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Awadhesh Kumar, learned A.C. to Standing Counsel no.17, who appears on behalf of Respondent nos.1 and 7/ State and Sri Dharmeshwar Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent nos.2 to 6/ Bihar State Electricity Board. The writ petition was filed with a prayer to direct the Respondents to pay all the retiral dues in respect of husband of the petitioner; such as Gratuity, Group Insurance and Revised pension etc with statutory interest. Learned counsel for the petitioner, in view of the stand taken in the counter affidavit, submits that save and except revision of pension, all other retiral dues have already been paid. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that for the purpose of revision, the petitioner may be granted liberty to approach the competent authority. The prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner for 2 approaching the competent authority so far as claim of revision of pension is concerned was not refuted by the learned counsel for the Respondents. In view of the stand taken by the parties, the writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner for filing a detailed representation before Respondent no.3 i.e. the General Manager-cum- Chief Engineer, Koshi Electric Supply Division, Saharsa so far as revision of pension is concerned. If such representation is filed by the petitioner, it is expected that Respondent no.3 will examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law preferably within a period of four months from the date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J. )