IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52286 of 2008 VIMAL KUMAR MISHRA & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 12.1.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.3, namely, Vinod Kumar Mishra has been arrested and as such the bail application with respect to petitioner no.3 has become infructuous. It is accordingly dismissed. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioners are accused in a case under sections 365, 120B and 420 of the Penal Code. The allegation is that the victim lady was abducted from the hospital. The allegation has been made by one Satish Kumar Mishra who has filed a suit alleging that the sale deed executed by the victim lady in favour of the petitioners is forged document and has been obtained by playing fraud. The statement under section 164 of the Cr.P.C. of the victim lady indicates that she has denied the allegation that she had been kidnapped by the petitioners. Accordingly petitioners 1,2 and 4, namely, Vimal Kumar Mishra, Pramod Kumar Mishra @ Pramod Mishra and Ram Rati Devi are directed to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender in Chand PS Case No. 67/2008 on furnishing bail bonds of rupees ten thousand each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhabhua (Kaimur) subject to the conditions laid down under section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.) 2