1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.115 OF 2006 Ely Saliskousky, .. Applicant. Vs 1. The Intelligence Officer, Narcotic Control Bureau, Mumbai and anr. .. Respondents Mr T. Sayed, for the applicant. Mrs Kelkar i/b D.N.Salvi, for respondent no.1. Mr A.S.Shitole, APP for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 14th July, 2006 DATED : 14th July, 2006 DATED : 14th July, 2006 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The applicant has prayed for allowing him home made food provide by the Consulate of Israel. His prayer was, in fact, granted by the Special Judge, appointed under the NDPS Act. The applicant, however, has stated that despite this order the jail authorities were not allowing him to take home food. Mr Swati Sathe, Superintendent of Mumbai Central Prison, has filed reply affidavit and in paragraph 3 thereof has stated that she has instructed the officer to allow the home food after following the procedure of Jail Manual and the jail authorities will not have objection for home food if the procedure of Jail Manual is complied. In view of this affidavit, nothing further survives in the application. The application is accordingly disposed of. 2 2 2 (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)