IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 22ND JULY 2010 / 31ST ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 12152 of 2010(T) -------------------------------- PETITIONERS: ---------------- 1. SRI.V.A.XAVIER, AGED 57, S/O. V.J.ANTONY, VILLANASSERIL HOUSE, SHANTHINAGAR, THEVARA, COCHIN-13. 2. SMT. ROSY XAVIER, AGED 55, W/O. V.A.XAVIER, VILLANASSERIL HOUSE, SHANTHINAGAR, THEVARA, COCHIN-13. BY MR.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE, ADVOCATE. MR.ADEEP ANWAR, ADVOCATE. RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LOCAL ADMINISTRATION, TRIVANDRUM. 2. CORPORATION OF KOCHI, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, CORPORATION BUILDING, PARK AVENEUE ROAD, ERNAKULAM. BY MR.S.RAMESH BABU, SC.COCHIN CORPN. FOR R2. MR.A.J. VARGHESE, SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 12152/2010 A P P E N D I X PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT. P1 : COPY OF JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) No.20079/2006 DTD. 16.6.08 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT. EXT. P2 : COPY OF NOTICE DTD. 11.8.08. EXT. P3 : COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD SIGNED BY R2. EXT. P4 : COPY OF ORDER DTD. 31.5.09. EXT. P5 : COPY OF LETTER DTD. 17.3.10 ISSUED TO R2. EXT. P6 : COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD SIGNED BY R2. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. // True Copy // P.A. to Judge. smp T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.12152 OF 2010 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2010. J U D G M E N T The main prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the 2nd respondent to forthwith issue permit to the petitioners as indicated in Exhibit P4 order and direct them to accept the fees for such permit as indicated in condition No.4 in Exhibit P4 order. 2. It is submitted by the learned Standing Counsel for the Corporation that by communication dated 07.06.2010, the petitioner was informed that his application for issuance of hoarding permit cannot be granted, which is already communicated to the petitioner. In that view of the matter, the petitioner will have to challenge the same before the appropriate authority. Leaving open the said remedy, this writ petition is disposed of. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp