1 cao-45.11-- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 45 OF 2011 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 144 of 2011 in FERA APPEAL NO. 15 OF 2010 Raiz Patel. ... Appellant. V/s. Special Director, Enforcement Directorate. ... Respondents. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 46 OF 2011 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 150 of 2011 in FERA APPEAL NO. 16 OF 2010 J.F.D’Souza. ... Appellant. V/s. Special Director, Enforcement Directorate. ... Respondents. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 47 OF 2011 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 136 of 2011 in FERA APPEAL NO. 17 OF 2010 S.A.Parekh. ... Appellant. V/s. Special Director, Enforcement Directorate. ... Respondents. 2 cao-45.11-- WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 48 OF 2011 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 141 of 2011 in FERA APPEAL NO. 18 OF 2010 Madan Gopal Dhawan. ... Appellant. V/s. Special Directorate, Enforcement Directorate. ... Respondent. Vikram Nankani with Sushanth Murthy i/b. M.R.Baya for the appellants/review petitioners. G.N.Sharma with A.M.Sethna, Rajendra Kumar and Purnima Awasthi for respondent No.1. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATED : 17th February 2011. P.C. : Heard Mr.Nankani, learned counsel for the review petitioner and Mr.Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. For the reasons stated in the applications, the delay in filing review petitions is condoned. Both parties agree that review petitions should be heard along with 3 cao-45.11-- appeals. The suggestion given being reasonable, it needs acceptance. Needless to mention that the parties would be at liberty to address the Court in the light of the order of the Supreme Court. 3. At this juncture, Mr.Sharma, learned counsel appearing for respondent pointed out that pursuant to the order of this Court dated 30th September, 2010, the appellants were supposed to deposit 50% of the amount of fine within eight weeks from the date of the order. However, the said order has not yet been complied with. 4. Mr.Nankani, in reply, submits that so far as deposit is concerned, they have no objection to deposit this amount without prejudice to their rights and contentions raised in the appeal as well as in review petition. The statement made in this behalf is taken on record and time to deposit amount is granted till 20th March, 2011 without prejudice to the rights of the parties. Order accordingly. (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)