IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Criminal I Bail Application No.458 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Mangat @ Madan Pal S/o Phool Singh, R/o Village Ambuwalal P.S. Pathri, District Haridwar ……….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ------- Opposite party Arising out of Case Crime No.33 of 2010, U/s 323/324/325/307/504/506 IPC, P.S. Pathri, Distt.Haridwar Dated: April 26, 2010 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. Parikshit Saini, Adv. for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, learned Addl. G.A. for the State as well as Mr. K.S. Verma, Advocate for the complainant. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that it was shown that the present applicant along with co-accused Sukhpal and Ravindra had caused injuries to injured Prem on 28.2.2010 at about 11 AM. He further argued that spade was shown in the hand of present applicant and co-accused Sukhpal and Ravindra were shown having iron rod and Balkati (a sharp edged weapon) respectively. Injury report of injured Prem has also been annexed in which one incised wound is shown in the left palm b/w thumb and 1st metacarpal of injured and the injury has been opined as simple in nature. He further argued that the injury, as alleged by the prosecution, caused by the applicant is not on the vital part and even it is simple in nature. He further argued that against the co-accused Sukhpal and Ravindra, the police has submitted the final report. After considering all the facts and circumstances, perusing the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Mangat @ Madan Pal be released on bail on his executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Haridwar. The bail application is allowed accordingly. 26.04.2010 Rajeev Dang (Dharam Veer, J.)