IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40951 of 2010 RAJENDRA TIWARI………………………. petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR………………………….. opp. party ----------- 2 15-11-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. From the order of the sessions court it appears that the case is under section 302/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act and on account of subsequent materials cognizance has been taken against the petitioner as well as some others It has been submitted that, according to statement of main witnesses, in the F.I.R. there is no allegations of firing against this petitioner. It has been submitted that allegation of firing is against co- accused Ram Darshan Tiwari. It has further been submitted that allegation of firing attributed to the petitioner in the protest petition is not supporting by the witnesses. Considering the nature of the offences and the allegation against this petitioner and other co-accused who were with co-accused Ram Darshan Tiwari, it is not found an appropriate case for grant of anticipatory bail. The prayer is rejected. This order shall not prejudice the case of this petitioner if he surrenders and seeks regular bail. Naresh ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)