IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY THE EIGHTEENTH OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7951 OF 2008 Between: Smt. N. Pushpa W/o N. Bhadraiah. .. Petitioner (De facto Complainant) AND 1. State of A.P., rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. 2. T.Sushma D/o Late T.Sadanand, R/o H. No. 10-3-21, East Marredpally, Secunderabad. 3. T.Sudheer S/o Late Sadanand, R/o 16-3-31, East Marredpally, Secunderabad. 4. Mohan Goud S/o B. Yadagiri Goud, R/o Plot No. 59 Vamshikrishnagar, Hasmahpet, Secunderabad. ......Respondents/Petitioners/Accused 1 to 3 Petition Under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to cancel the bail granted by the Court of the IV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, in Crl. MP. NO. 2852 of 2008, dated 29.9.2008 and to commit the accused to custody; The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and grounds filed herein and the order of the High Court dated 04-12-2008 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri D. Hanumanth Rao, Advocate for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1, the Court made the following ORDER: This is a petition filed for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted by the Court below. The grievance of the petitioner is that without any changed circumstances, the learned Judge granted anticipatory bail to the respondents 2 to 4 – accused 1 to 3, on second application filed on the very next day of the dismissal of the earlier bail application, though the order was passed after ten days. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that after getting anticipatory bail, the respondents got emboldened and continuously threatening the petitioner-de-facto complainant as they are running a wine shop in the premises of the de-facto complainant. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks time for filing counter. Post after Sankranthi Vacation, 2009. In the meantime, it is directed that the respondents 3 and 4 shall appear before the Station House Officer, Maredupalli Police Station, Secunderabad, every alternate day between 8.00 p.m. and 10.00 p.m. until further orders instead of on 16th of every month. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1. The IV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad. 2. The Station House Officer, Marredpally Police Station, Secunderabad. 3. T.Sushma D/o Late T.Sadanand, R/o H. No. 10-3-21, East Marredpally, Secunderabad. 4. T.Sudheer S/o Late Sadanand, R/o 16-3-31, East Marredpally, Secunderabad. 5. Mohan Goud S/o B. Yadagiri Goud, R/o Plot No. 59 Vamshikrishnagar, Hasmahpet, Secunderabad. 6. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High of A.P., Hyderabad. ( OUT) 7. One spare copy. 8. One CC to Sri D. Hanumanth Rao, Advocate (OPUC) BRT HIGH COURT PSR.J DATED : 18-12-2008 NOTE: POST AFTER SANKRANTHI VACATION, 2009 ORDER CRL.P.NO. 7951 OF 2008 DIRECTION HIGH COURT BRT DRAFTED ON: 19-12-2008 PSR.J DATED : 18-12-2008 NOTE: POST AFTER SANKRANTHI VACATION, 2009 ORDER CRL.P.NO. 7951 OF 2008 DIRECTION