IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1600 of 2008 KEDAR MAHTO & ORS Versus SMT.KANCHAN DEVI & ANR ----------- 2 19.9.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioners. In the opinion of this Court, the impugned order rejecting the prayer of the petitioner for rejecting the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 has been rightly rejected by the Court below. This Court would not find any jurisdictional error in the impugned order especially when in the plaint, there is cause of action as also a reason for filing of partition suit. That being so, this civil revision application, being wholly misconceived, is hereby dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)