IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32306 of 2011 Chandan Kumar son of Ram Chandar Prasad Mandal Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 29.9.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 121A, 122, 124A/34 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Sections 25(1-b)a, 25(1)(1-A), 35/34 of the Arms Act and Sections 10, 13 of the U.A.P.A. Act. The prosecution case is that the police in course of intercepting some miscreants from transacting with maoist, the petitioner was arrested with arms. The petitioner has prayed for bail on the ground that he is in custody since 9.3.2011 and similarly placed co-accused Vijay Yadav has been granted bail. From the order of Vijay Yadav co-accused I find that he was granted bail for the reason that ten cartridges were recovered from his possession and no charge sheet was submitted in his regard and, therefore, no cognizance was taken as also that he has fair antecedents. Where the petitioner is concerned, there are other cases pending against him. In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The prayer for bail is rejected. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )