THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHHAMED C.R.P.No.2994 of 2011 ORDER This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the judgment and decree dated 30.05.2011 passed in R.A.No.136 of 2010 by the learned Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, confirming the order of eviction dated 26.03.2010 passed in R.C.No.62 of 2007 by the learned III Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad. 2. The respondent-landlord filed R.C.No.62 of 2007 seeking eviction of the petitioner-tenant from the petition schedule property stating that he requires the petition schedule property for his bona fide use and occupation. The trial Court, after consideration of the oral and documentary evidence, allowed the same directing the petitioner to vacate and hand over the petition schedule premises to the respondent within a period of one month from the date of the said order. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed R.A.No.136 of 2010 and the appellate Court, on re-appreciation of the entire evidence and perusal of the material available on record, dismissed the appeal confirming said order of eviction and granted further two months time to the petitioner to vacate the petition schedule property. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed the present civil revision petition. 3. Both the Courts below, on consideration of material available on record, concurrently held that the requirement of the petition schedule property by the respondent is bona fide. In view of the said concurrent findings arrived at by the Courts below, I find no reason to interfere with the same. The Civil Revision Petition is devoid of merit and the same is accordingly dismissed. However, six months time is granted to the petitioner-tenant to vacate the petition schedule property from today. No costs. _____________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J Date:29.07.2011 sj