IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22465 of 2009 MANU SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 23.07.2009 This case reflects misuse of privilege of bail. The offence was committed sometimes in 1989. He was released on bail on merit. On 07.08.1993, the bail bonds of the petitioners were cancelled as the petitioner defaulted in appearing before the court below. On 29.03.1995, he was declared absconder and permanent warrant of arrest was issued. On 30.03.2009, he was apprehended and produced before the court. It appears that the case of the petitioner remained pending, in the meanwhile, for supply of police paper. Learned Sessions Judge, while rejecting his application for bail, granted him liberty to renew prayer for ail after six months, if the trial is not concluded. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the charges have not yet been framed. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this court disposes of the present application with the following observations/directions: The trial court is directed to take adequate stapes for framing of charge against the petitioner within two months from the date of receipt/communication of a copy of this order in the 2 court below. No sooner the charges are framed, the trial court shall release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ara (Bhojpur) in connection with Koilwar (Bhojpur) P.S.Case no. 120/89, subject to the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors should be the own/close family member of the petitioner. (ii) Petitioner shall appear in person, on the date(s) fixed at the trial. In case of default on two consecutive dates it shall be open to the trial court to cancel the bail bond and secure his arrest in accordance with law. With this observation, the present application is disposed of. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)