IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3813 of 1994 1. RAMESH KUMAR PRASAD SINGH,SON OF SHRI KAMESHWAR PRASAD SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE TETRA BISHANPUR, POLICE STATION SAKRA, DIST. MUZAFFARPUR, AT PRESENT ACCOUNTANT,K.C.T.C. COLLEGE, RAXAUL IN THE DISTRICT OF EAST CHAMPARAN. 2. SMT. SHANTA KUMARI,D/O LATE SHANESHI SHARAN PRASAD MOTOR WORKS, STATION ROAD, BETTIAH AT PRESENT LABORATORY INCHARGE IN ZOOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF K.C.T.C. COLLEGE 3. DAYANAND, SON OF SRI S.N.P.VERMA, PRESENTLY LABORATORY INCHARGE, CHEMISTRY DEPTT. K.C.T.C. COLLEGE, RAXAUL, DIST. EAST CHAMPARAN. 4. RABI RANJAN KUMAR, SON OF SHRI RAGHUNANDAN PD. PRESENTLY LABORATORY INCHARGE, BOTANYDEPARTMENT, K.C.T.C. COLLEGE, RAXAUL, DIST. EAST CHAMPARAN. 5. SHIO KUMAR MISHRA, SON OF SHRI MOHAN MISHRA, PRESENTLY OFFICE PEON, K.C.T.C. COLLEGE, RAXAUL, DIST. EAST CHAMPARAN. 6. MD. ISHA ANSARI, SON OF MD. MIAN, PRESENTLY OFFICE PEON, K.C.T.C. COLLEGE, RAXAUL 7. MD. IBRAHIM ANSARI, SON OF MOHAMMAD SARIF, PRESENTLY DARWAN, K.C.T.C. COLLEGE, RAXAUL, DIST. EAST CHAMPARAN. 8. SURESH PD. SAH, SON OF GANGA PD. SAH, OFFICE ASSISTANT, K.C.T.C. COLLEGE, RAXAUL, DIST. EAST CHAMPARAN. 9. PREM SHANKAR PASWAN, SON OF KAMED PASWAN OFFICE PEON, K.C.T.C. COLLEGE, RAXAUL, DIST. EAST CHAMPARAN. - 2 - 10. MAN MOHAN SINGH, SON OF HARISHANKAR PD. SINGH, 11. NAND LAL, SON OF SHRI SATYA NARAIN, 12. MUKESH KUMAR, SON OF SHRI HARDEO SINGH, 13. RAMESH MANDAL, SON OF SHRI GANGAJALI MANDAL, SL. NO. 10 TO 13 ARE OFFICE PEON, K.C.T.C. COLLEGE, RAXAUL, DIST. EAST CHAMPARAN. 14. A.C. TIWARI, SON OF SHRI RADHA KRISHNA TIWARI, OFFICE ASSISTANT, K.C.T.C. COLLEGE, RAXAUL, DIST. EAST CHAMPARAN. 15. VIJAY KUMAR MISHRA, SON OF SHRI GOPAL MISHRA, OFFICE ASSISTANT, K.C.T.C. COLLEGE, RAXAUL, DIST. EAST CHAMPARAN. 16. KRISHNA MAHTO, SON OF LATE RAJENDRA MAHTON, ORDERLY PEON, K.C.T.C. COLLEGE, RAXAUL, DIST. EAST CHAMPARAN 17. RAJ KUMAR SAH, SON OF SRI CHALITRA SAH, OFFICE PEON, K.C.T.C. COLLEGE, RAXAUL, DIST. EAST CHAMPARAN. 18. BRAJ KRISHNA SINGH, SON OF SHRI NARESHWAR SINGH, 19. AMBIKA THAKUR, SON OF SHR SARBA THAKUR 20. PANNA LAL PD. SON OF SHRI RAM CHANDRA PD. PETITIONER NOS. 18 TO 20 ARE OFFICE PEON, K.C.T.C. COLLEGE, RAXAUL, DIST. EAST CHAMPARAN. 21. UPENDRA PD., SON OF SHRI YOGI RAM, LAB BOY, K.C.T.C. COLLEGE, RAXAUL, DIST. EAST CHAMPARAN. 22. SHITA SHARAN RAI, SON OF RAMASHISH RAI, NIGHT GUARD, K.C.T.C. COLLEGE, RAXAUL, DIST. EAST CHAMPARAN.--- PETITIONERS Versus 1.THE BIHAR UNIVERSITY, MUZAFFARPUR,THROUGH - 3 - ITS REGISTRAR 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, BIHAR UNIVERSITY, MUZAFFARPUR 3.THE CHANCELLOR, BIHAR UNIVERSITY, MUZAFFARPUR. 4.THE PRINCIPAL, K.C.T.C. COLLEGE, RAXAUL, EAST CHAMPARAN--- RESPONDENTS For the petitioners:- Mr. Tara Nath Jha,Advocate For the Respondents:- None O R D E R 11 27.11.2008 Prayer of the petitioners in this application is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to regularize their services and make payment of their salary. According to the petitioners, they are working in K.C.T.C. College, Raxaul in the district of Champaran in different capacities as Class III and Class IV. It is the grievance of the petitioners that neither their services are being regularized nor they have been paid their salary. According to the petitioners - 4 - themselves they “earlier moved before this Court for the reliefs as sought in this application in CWJC No.6894 of 1991 which was disposed of on 4.12.1992 under which the matter was remanded to the Chancellor.” According to the petitioners, after the said order, they had submitted copy of the order in the office of the Chancellor and in fact notice was issued by the office of the Chancellor but when they appeared the case was adjourned. On the basis of the aforesaid averment, the petitioners have filed this application for the reliefs as aforementioned. Mr. Tara Nath Jha, appears on behalf of the petitioners. No body appears on behalf of the respondents. According to the petitioners’ own showing they have preferred writ application before this Court for the - 5 - same reliefs and this court had relegated the petitioners to the remedy before the Chancellor. In fact the remedy was invoked and the Chancellor had given notice to the petitioners for appearance on a particular date. In the face of it, it is inexpedient to go into the merit of the claims of the petitioners. Petitioners, if so advised, may approach the Chancellor for passing appropriate order in the light of the observation of this Court dated 4.12.1992 passed in CWJC No. 6894 of 1991. However in case the Chancellor had decided the matter already, the remedy before the petitioners is to challenge the same. In view of aforesaid facts the reliefs sought for by the petitioners are not fit to be granted in the present - 6 - application. In the result, we do not find any merit in the application and it is dismissed with the observation aforesaid. (Chandramauli Kr.Prasad,J.) (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J.) A.Kumar