8.wp.7034-06 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITON NO.7034 OF 2006 Haribhau K. Kedar. ..Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. ..Respondents. ... Mr.Sanjay D. Thokade, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.S.R. Nargolkar, AGP, for Respondet No.1. Mr.R.S.Apte, Sr.Counsel for Respondent No.3. ... CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH & A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 11, 2010. P.C. 1. It is common ground that the Standing Committee of the respondent Corporation has allowed the appeal filed by the petitioner and the order of his removal from the service of the corporation passed by the Commissioner has been set aside. However, the Corporation has not so far implemented the resolution of the Standing Committee because according to the Corporation a reference has been made of that resolution to the Government for rescinding that resolution. But, though reference has been made in the month of April, 2009, till this 8.wp.7034-06 2 date the Government has not taken any decision. In our opinion, therefore, following order would meet the ends of justice : :: O R D E R :: [i] If the State Government does not rescind the resolution of the Standing Committee passed in favour of the petitioner setting aside the order of his removal from service, within a period of four weeks from today, the Corporation shall immediately implement the resolution of the Standing Committee subject to the decision that the State Government may take in its power to rescind the decision of the Standing Committee. [ii] Rule is made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (D.K. DESHMUKH,J.) (A.R. JOSHI, J.)