IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 434 OF 2004 MR.MAHADEV R.VAZE AND 3 ORS., ....Petitioners Versus MR. SAGUN S.GADDI @ GHADI AND 5 ....Respondents ORS., Mr. S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Ms. Shreya Naik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amrut Kansar, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 6. Coram:- R. M. LODHA, J. Date:- 25th August, 2005 P.C. Heard Mr. S. D. Lotlikar, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners. 2. Learned Senior Counsel, at the outset, submitted that practically the writ petition has become infructuous. Even, otherwise, upon perusal of the impugned order and available material on record, I am satisfied that the dismissal of the temporary injunction application made by the petitioners (plaintiffs) by the Courts below does not suffer from any infirmity or error of jurisdiction. Writ Petition is dismissed in limine. R. M. LODHA, J.