1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7088 OF 2007 1.Shri.Dashrath Baburao Tapkir & ors. ...Petitioners. vs. 1.Shri.Bhagwan Genbhau Thakur & Anr. ...Respondents. --- Mr.V.B.Tapkir, for Petitioners. Mr.Anil S.Shitole, for Respondents. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. DATED: 11th JANUARY,2008. P.C.:- 1. This petition is directed against the orders passed concurrently by both the Courts below holding that the plaintiffs are entitled to temporary injunction restraining the present petitioners- defendants from disturbing the possession of the plaintiffs. Admitted position is that the present 2 petitioners had filed a civil suit and in that civil suit they had applied for temporary injunction restraining the respondents from disturbing their possession. The Courts did not find that the present petitioners were in possession, and therefore, the temporary injunction was declined. In my opinion, considering this fact and the fact that there are concurrent findings recorded by both the Courts below that prima facie the plaintiffs appear to be in possession of the property, the orders impugned cannot be interfered with. The petition is rejected. ---