IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 25971 of 2002 Between: ICICI Bank, ICICI Tower,level iv 1-11-256 rep.by its Chief Manger V.V.S.N.Raju S/o V.Ramachandra Raju, Begumpet, Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of A.P., Industries & Commerce Department, rep. by its Principal Secretary Secretariat Building, Hyderabad 2 The Parchur Cotton Growers Cooperative Spinning Mills Ltd., Inkolu 523 167 Prakasam District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an order or direction or writ particualrly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.1 in not complaying with its gurantee of repaying the petitioner in resrect of amount advanced to the 2nd respondent Company and not in deposting the sale proceeds with the petitioner as being illegal,arbitrary, unconstitutional apart from being violative of the principles of the Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel and consequently direct the 1st respondent to forhtwith comply with the promise and guarantee made to the petitioner Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.NIRANJAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P.No.25971 of 2002 ORAL ORDER: The learned counsel for petitioner states that the issue that arises for consideration in this writ petition is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.1821 of 2001 dated 30.9.2002, wherein it was held that all the employees including the members of the petitioner are entitled to set up their claims before the Registrar of Cooperative Societies, who shall consider those claims of the employees along with other claims by other creditors and the like and deal with such claims in accordance with law and the priorities enunciated in the scheme formulated under Section 12(A) of A.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 or any provisions of a relevant law. The learned counsel states that the issue in this writ petition is squarely covered by the above order and therefore this writ petition is also liable to be disposed of in terms of the said order. In view of the same, following the order passed in W.P.No.1821 of 2001 dated 30.9.2002, this writ petition is also disposed of in terms of the above order. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 10.6.2009 DA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P.No.25971 of 2002 10.6.2009