IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.369 of 2009 RITESH KUMAR SINGH @ BRITESH KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 01.04.2009. The petitioner who has been declared a juvenile is in custody since 14.10.2008 in a case registered for offence under sections 394/302/34 I.P.C. and 27 of the Arms Act. Prosecution case is that two persons dealing in the business of fertilizers were moving on motorcycle, in the meantime, armed miscreants intercepted, fired, looted away their money killing one of them. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not named in the FIR and no one has seen any one committing the offence. On the other hand, learned Addl PP submits that in several paragraphs some witnesses have stated that some time prior to the occurrence they heard accused persons talking together that they will finish the work, thereafter the victim was found murdered. Taking into consideration the totality of circumstances, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is refused with observation to renew the prayer for bail after three months. Shashi. (S.P.Singh,J)