IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.13446 of 2011 Date of Decision : July 28, 2011. Ashok Kumar and another .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Vivek Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of the order which I propose to pass, there is no necessity to seek any counter-reply from the respondents at this stage. The petitioners are working as Guest Faculty Lecturers in Management and English, respectively, in respondent No.3-college. They seek a direction that they be not relieved from their assignments with a view to adjust other Guest Faculty (Lecturers) in their place. C.W.P.No .13446 of 2011 2 Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, states that as a matter of policy and subject to the petitioners' eligibility and availability of work, the Guest Faculty (Lecturers) like the petitioners are not to be substituted by another set of Guest Faculty (Lecturers). The writ petition is disposed of in the above-stated terms. Dasti. July 28, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE