IGI i .i^'Wjr^lARH: Writ_Petition_(Sl ^_58SOoL_2008 R?. »/^/ H.R. Dahariya, Ag Late C.L. Dahariya, R/o. Navapara, Surajpur, District Surguja (Chhattisgarh). Versus 1. State of^Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (CG). 2. En< Si Chief Enaineer, Dlstrict Bilaspur (Chhatt'sgarh) 'Executive Engineer, Water Resources Division, Surajpur, District Surguja K.S. Dhruve, Assistant Engineer, OfRce ofj Chief Engineer, Haseo, Kachhar, BiiaspuF,: Head Office, Raigarh, District Raigarh (CG). Eiection Commission ' of india, aecretary, ESection Commisston of india, New Deihi. under Atticle 226 ofthe ?etltioner. s. Sn'tita Ghai, Pane 1r- Manoj Paranjpe, cbunsei Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate with Lawyer for the State. (Passed on this 20th day QI the c.Qnsent of iearned counse petition is heardfihaiiy'; earing for the parties, thje ier submifs thai tfie Learned counssl appear does not'want'to press fhis petitioner may 'oe permitted to authorities within a considered and of three days and the same may . in accordancewith iaw.within the 59 ••'a 3) Mr. Sao, learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the State submits that if the representatjon.is made, the same shall be considered and decided by the concerned suthority, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of two weeks from the dats of receipt of the repressntation. 4) Mr. Sao further submits that no Goereiye steps shall be taken against the petittoner, till the disposa! ofthe representation. 5) i hope and trost that the State Governmeni shali examine the representetion objectively in accordance with iaw and guidelines, issued by the Government time to tlme . 6) In view of the foregoing, the.petttion stands disposed of. No ordar as to costs. Consequentiy, i.A.No.1 stands disposedt».__ ; :l-SdA- . '' j ! SatishK.iAgnihotri ; | ^^jTudge.' -, ; , j KSiU