1 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.20 OF 2009 Insanali Ilakedar Shaikh ..Petitioner V/s. City & Industrial Development ..Respondents Corporation Limited & anr. Mr.R.P.Lote, Advocate, for the Petitioner Mr.G.S.Hegde, Advocate, for the Respondents CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 16TH JULY, 2010 P.C. . By this Petition, the Petitioner claims that there has been a breach of the Order dated 11th March, 2008 passed by this Court in Writ Petition Nos.5184 of 2007, 6997 of 2007, 9020 of 2007 and 9021 of 2007. The present Petitioner was the Petitioner in Writ Petition No.9020 of 2007. 2. One Gulam Kadir was the Petitioner in Writ Petition No.6997 of 2007 which was also 2 disposed of by the same Order dated 11th March, 2008. He had filed similar Contempt Petition No.436 of 2008. This Court dismissed the Contempt Petition on 13th November, 2009 finding that there was no contempt committed. 3. Another Petitioner  Mubarak Husenmiya Allimiya in Writ Petition No.5184 of 2007 had also filed Contempt Petition No.435 of 2008 which came before another Bench of this Court was disposed of by Order dated 4th September, 2009 whereby it was categorically observed that the Respondents had not committed any contempt. At that stage the learned Counsel for the Petitioner stated that he would like to approach the CIDCO by making appropriate representation. 4. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner now wants that a similar Order should be passed in the present Contempt Petition. There is no need to pass any such Order. If 3 the Petitioner wants to make a representation he does not need any Order from this Court. Both the learned Counsel state that this Court may at least observe that CIDCO should decide their representation within reasonable time. This prayer is also rejected. Such prayers give rise to further mischief & litigation. There is no question of giving any direction to the CIDCO, since in the original Order dated 11th March, 2008 there was no direction to the CIDCO. 5. Contempt Petition is dismissed. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)