IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1043 of 2007 MISHRI LAL YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS 3 3-2-2010 Heard the parties. As per order of the writ court dated 10-8-2006 contained in annexure-1, the representation of the petitioner in respect of his promotion was to be considered without any delay, preferably within four months. In their show cause the opposite parties have placed reliance upon interim orders passed in writ petitions of the year 1996-98 contained in annexures B and C to the show cause for explaining that they were prevented from taking final decision on account of such interim order. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that those writ petitions have now been finally disposed of on 21-4-2009 and hence now a fresh direction may be issued to the respondents that upon petitioners producing a copy of the final order of those cases the authority should take a final decision on petitioners’ representation at an early date. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the submission noticed above. Accordingly, this contempt - 2 - petition is finally disposed of with a direction to the concerned opposite parties, particularly, the District Superintendent of Education, Purnea to dispose of petitioner’s representation in accordance with law within three months of the filing or producing a copy of the order to show that the writ petitions in question which were pending earlier have been finally disposed of. ( Shiva Kirti Singh,J) Naresh