HIGH COUR.T OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P. JS1 Wo. 4416 of 2007 PETITIONBR RESPONDENTS 1 Yogesh Anaad s/o Dr. A.K. Ram, aged about 37 years, R/o Parijat Extension Colony, B-21, BUaspur, District-Bilaspur Chliattisgarh Versus State of Chhattisgarh through Secretaiy, Panchayat & Gi-amin Vikas Vibhag, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, District-Raipur(CG) Development Coinmissioner, Paachayat & Gramin Vikas Vibhag, Vikas Bhawan, Raipur, Distdct- RaipurfCG) Executive Engineer, Rural Engineering Scmces, Bilaspur, District-Bilaspur(CG) Chief Executive OflBcer, Janpad Panchayat Bitha, District- Bilaspitr(CG) Manoj Sinha (Sarpanch) Graiu Paachayat, Mudhipar, Tahsil Bilapsiir, District-BflaspurfCG) WRIT PBTITIOB UMDER ARTICLE 226 OP THB COHSTITUTION OF INDIA A.ppe.EU'auees Shri Manoj Pai-anjape, Connsel for the petitioner. Ms. Deepali Pandey, Paael Lawyei for fhe Stafe/respondents N6.1 to 4 on advaace copy. QRALOimER (3.S.20071 SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard on admission. The petitioner, who has been fi-ansferred from Jaupad Panchayat Bflha, Bilaspur to Janpad Panchayat, Dhamtari, District Dhamtan on adtujnistrative grounds, has chaUenged the validity of his transfer order. It is stated that the petitioner is posted at Bilba since 21.10.2005. After arguing for sonic time, leanied counsel for the pctitioner subnuts that the petitioner has fited a representation 'vide Annexiuie P-8 aiid the same has not been decided so far, sunita W.P.(S) No. 4416/2007 therefore, a directioa inay be given to tlie coocemerl authority to decide fhe representation. This prayer is not opposed by leamed counsel for fhe State. The same is allowed. This petition is disposed of with a direction that if the representation fited by the petitioner vide Annexure P-8 has not been decided so far, it shall be decided by the concemed aufhority within a period of four weeks froin the date of piioduction of certified copy ofthis order alongwith a copy ofwrit petition. The petition stands finalty disposed of. Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge ¥-