RSA No.2745 of 2008 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.2745 of 2008 Date of Decision: 22.07.2010 Darshan Singh and another .……Appellants Versus Jagdish Chand and others ……Respondents Coram:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL. Present: Mr.Inderjit Sharma, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Munish Gupta, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 3. L. N. MITTAL, J (ORAL) This is second appeal by defendant Nos.1 and 2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file. I need not to go into the merits of the case. Suffice to mention that suit was filed by respondent Nos.1 to 3 herein against appellants and proforma respondent No.1 Ghansham Lal. The suit was decreed by the trial Court vide judgment and decree dated 20.07.2005. The said judgment and decree were challenged by filing first appeal by Ghansham Lal along with his vendees,` who are proforma respondent Nos.2 and 3 herein, who were not party in the trial Court. However, defendant Nos.1 and 2, who are the appellants herein, did not file any first appeal against the judgment and decree of the trial Court and they straight away filed the instant second appeal. In view thereof, the instant second appeal by defendant Nos.1 and 2 is not maintainable as no first appeal was preferred by RSA No.2745 of 2008 -2- them against the judgment and decree of the trial Court. For the reasons recorded hereinabove, the instant second appeal is dismissed. 22.07.2010 ( L. N. MITTAL ) A. Kaundal JUDGE