IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 10012 of 1995 Between: K.V.Rao and others ..... PETITIONER AND The Managing Director-Vice Chairman, APSRTC, Hyderabad And two others ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:None appeared Counsel for the Respondents:---- The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in not considering the appointments of the petitioners as Junior Assistants as per Notification No.E4/331 (6)/93-RM (NLR) dated 11-05-1993 of the third respondent and consequentially direct the respondents to appoint the petitioners as Junior Assistants.” At the hearing, Sri D.Sunil Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri G.Vidya Sagar, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that the petitioners have taken away the brief from the learned counsel. As no one represented the petitioners at the hearing, it is reasonable to presume that they are not interested in prosecuting their case. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 24th November, 2008 vrn