1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION APPA NO.130 OF 2011. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS KISHOR @ BALYA S/O EKNATH BINEKAR AND OTHERS ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri C. H. Jaltare, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. T. A. Mirza, APP for respondent State. CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATE : 07TH FEBRUARY 2011. 1. Upon admission of this appeal against acquittal, this Court had directed action under Section 390 of Cr. P. C. By way of Non Bailable Warrants. 2. Accordingly, applicants, having come to know about the order of action under Section 390 of the Criminal Procedure Code, have surrendered and have been taken in custody. 3. The applicants have offered to attend the 2 Police Station with such frequency as may be directed and abide by any other terms, and prayed for release on bail. 4. Heard both sides. 5. Purpose of action under Section 390 of Cr. P. C. is to secure attendance of accused in the hearing and to hear them in the event of conviction and to hear the sentence if adverse. 6. This purpose can be accomplished if the applicants are released on bail particularly when they have voluntarily surrendered. 7. We, therefore, pass following order. (a) Applicants be released on bail on their furnishing bail bond in a sum of Rs.25000/- and one or more solvent sureties to make up like sum. (b) They shall furnish in this Court within 10 days from release affidavit stating their present address and an undertaking that changed address, if any, shall be furnished immediately within 2 weeks from such change. 3 (c) They shall attend concerned Police Station in 1st week of each month, preferably on Sunday and mark the attendance. (d) They shall attend this Court at the time of final hearing without further notice. 8. Hamdast is allowed. Judge Judge |muley|