1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CA No. 1491 of 2007 In WP No. 1952 of 00 MC, Umrer and anr v. Smt Kanchanmala ---------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's Orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------ - Mr S. G. Charde, Advocate for petitioner. Mr M.P. Jaiswal, Advocate for respondent. Coram : A.B. Chaudhari, J Dated : 3.9.2007 1/ This application has been taken out by the petitioners for final disposal of the writ petition. Having heard both the counsel for the parties, it appears that the writ petition can be disposed of finally. Both the parties have consented to dispose of the writ petition in view of the statement made in paragraph 3 of the civil application which is quoted below: “It is pointed out that the respondent has been absorbed as per the Government policy and she has been given the benefit 2 in accordance with law in the matter and the grievance in the present writ petition accruing on account of the order passed by the learned Industrial Court has been rendered as infructuous.” 2/ In view of the above statement, the grievance of the respondent no.1 has been redressed. Consequently, writ petition is rendered infructuous. Same is disposed of as such. Rule discharged. There shall be no order as to costs. Judge. hsj