1 D.B.CIVIL REVIEW PETITION NO.17/2007 In D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL(W) NO.942/2006 In S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6097/2006 Shankar Lal v. Mangilal Date of Order :: 9th October, 2007 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PRAKASH TATIA HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. K.L.Khatri, for the petitioner. .... Review of the order dated 5.1.2007 passed in DBCivil Special Appeal (W) No.942/2006 is sought on the count that the Division Bench overlooked the provisions of clause (22) of the Rajasthan Food Grains and Other Essential Articles (Regularisation and Distribution) Order, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as “the Order of 1976”), while holding that “Shanker Lal lacked in locus standi to file appeal and the order of the Collector is fit to be set aside on this ground alone”. It is stated that as per clause (22) of the Order of 1976 “any person aggrieved by an order made by any officer under this order may : (a)if the order is made by any officer lower in rank than the Collector, appeal to the Collector”, and therefore, any person could have preferred appeal before the Collector. 2 We find no substance in the review petition as the appeal under clause (22) of the Order of 1976 is available to “any person aggrieved” i.e. the person who has suffered an order under clause (8) of the Order of 1976 relating to suspension or cancellation of authorisation granted to run wholesale/fair price shop. The remedy of the appeal is not available to “any person” but to “any person aggrieved”. The review petition is accordingly rejected. ( GOVIND MATHUR ),J. ( PRAKASH TATIA ),J. Kkm/ps.