bsb IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 4447 OF 2009 PETITION NO. 4447 OF 2009 PETITION NO. 4447 OF 2009 Shri Naresh Ramniklal Mehta ... Petitioner v/s The Additional Collector, Raigad & ors. ... Respondents Mr.M. Sathe with Mr.Surel Shah and Ms.Samidha Vedpathak i/by Maneksha & Sethna for the petitioner. Mr.S.D.Rayrikar, A.G.P. for Resp.Nos.1 to 3 State. Mr.R.S.Tripathi for the respondent No.4. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 4TH MAY, 2009 4TH MAY, 2009 4TH MAY, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C.: 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the Deputy Collector on 3.3.2009 in R.T.S. Appeal No.5 of 2008. The main grievance of the petitioner appears to be that he was not heard before the order was passed. 2. In these circumstances, although there is an alternative remedy of filing a revision under Section 257 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, in my opinion, it would be appropriate to direct the parties to appear before the Deputy Collector. The Deputy Collector shall hear all the parties, the petitioner as well as 2 respondent No.4 and decide the matter afresh. Till then, the orders impugned in this petition will not be acted upon. 3. The parties will not act upon the mutation entries which have already been effected. 4. Writ petition disposed of accordingly. .....