WP(C) 418/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE I A ANSARI Heard Mr. A. Ali, learned counsel, appearing for the writ petitioner, and Mr. B. K. Sarma, learned Standing counsel, Social Welfare Department, Government of As sam, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3. The grievance of the writ petitioner is, in brief, thus: The petitioner was applicant for appointment to the post of Anganwadi Worker in Anganwadi cente r No. 31, under Dalgaon Sialmari ICDS Project in the District of Sonitpur. The petitioner claims that the private respondent, who has been selected as Anganwad i Worker, does not belong to the place, where the Anganwadi center is located. As the dispute, raised by the petitioner, is substantially factual in na ture, this Court is of the view that in the facts and circumstance of the presen t case, respondent No. 2, namely, Director, Social Welfare Department, Assam, sh all examine the claim of the petitioner. Whatever decision is reached, in this regard, by the respondents/authorities concerned, or whatever order is, ultimate ly, passed by the respondents/authorities concerned, on the petitioner’s grievan ces, shall be communicated, in writing, to the petitioner and, if the petitioner feels aggrieved by the decision(s), which may be reached, or the order(s), whic h may be passed by the respondents/authorities concerned, the petitioner shall r emain at liberty to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissibl e. The whole exercise, so directed, shall be completed within a period of t wo months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by the respondent No. 2. The petitioner may furnish to the respondent No. 2 a certified copy of this order along with a copy of the writ petition and annexure thereto. With the above observations and directions, this writ petition stands di sposed of. Furnish a copy of this order to the learned Standing counsel, Social Wel fare Department.