IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 6TH MARCH 2007 / 15TH PHALGUNA 1928 Bail Appl..No. 1305 of 2007() ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN CRMP.1363/2005 C.R.NO.6/05 OF MANNARKKAD EXCISE RANGE .................... : PETITIONER/ACCUSED: ------------------------------------ SUNDARAN, S/O. KUTTAN, ANDISSERY HOUSE, VAKKODE (P.O), POMBRA, MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.VINOD KUMAR.C RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENT: ------------------------ STATE, REPRESENTED BY EXCISE INSPECTOR, MANNARKKAD RANGE THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.JAI GEORGE THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` B.A. No. 1305 OF 2007 ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 6th day of March, 2007 O R D E R Petitioner, who is the accused in C.R.No.6/2005 of Mannarkkad Excise Range for an offence punishable under section 55 (a) of the Abkari Act for having been found in possession of 4 litres of illicit arrack on 10.5.2005, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application. 3. This is the second application for anticipatory bail filed by the petitioner. This court had as per Annexure-1 order dated 7.7.2005 in B.A.No.4154/05 dismissed the application for anticipatory bail filed by the petitioner. This is nothing but a clear abuse of the process of this court. I see no ground to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. This petition is accordingly dismissed. (V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE) aks