IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 14.09.2010 COCP No.1801 of 2010 (O&M) Balkaran Singh ...Petitioner Versus Harcharan Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. J.S.Thind, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) The petitioner has filed the present petition alleging disobedience to the decree granted by this Court on 14.03.1990. This Court on the aforesaid date return a finding that the parties are co-sharers, however, their rights shall be subject to partition. The grievance of the petitioner is that the sale is being effected in respect of specific khasra number though the parties were found to be co-sharers. I do not find that the contempt petition in respect of the aforesaid decree is maintainable after more than 20 years. The rights of the parties regarding partition have to be established before the Revenue Authorities even if sale is of specific khasra number. Such is the view of the Full Bench of this Court in Ram Chander Vs. Bhim Singh 2008 (3) PLR 747. In view of the above, I do not find that any case for initiation of contempt proceedings is made out. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to take recourse to the remedy as may be available to the petitioner in accordance with law. 14.09.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE