•^-^^^-•^•-^•vr^^^-'-</^'"^~-^'-/'>' S^TgB.H[GI gOjBT OF^Cp^TTI^G^RH ^T_EffI^%% i^G^). H.A. .2006 .-^ S.B. (Ctvil) ^^I^- 0^ sr.py ©e Appellant ^flai.ntiff). /.^/ <.<7/ ^/v L'<^" Rpspondeats ^ ^%^ /y ^vo • .cY' ^SATYA PRMASH TIWARI aged alaout 35 years, S/o Shri Sbrlkant Tiwari» B/o 1020 Adarsh Sagar NE¥-E[M-R©AD AiaDHEEtI WBST. KWBAI (Mahffrashfera) • -: Versus :- -1., MEADEO PRASA33 DIXIT S/o I^te SMtle Prasad Mxit Mxit Coloay, Bhilai. Tah. & Dtstt._DS5i-iSAl^ J^ STATE OP CHHATTISQJ^H Throiigh :« Collector» fi^^rv^f^I)Gfiorj Burg (C .©•) < MSMO OF APPEAL. (Msc. Appeal Itoder trder 45 of Sub-ftQle 6 of Rule 1, the Code o£ Civil Procedure). HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPTIR APPELLANT M.A. 1036 of2006 : Salya Prakash Tiwari Versus Sahu RESPONDENTS : Mahadeo Prasad Dixit & another MISC. APPEAL UNDER ORDER 43 SUBRULE6jOFRULE_l_OF£PC CSB: Hon'ble Mr. N.K. Asarwal, J.) Present : Shri VG Tamaskar, Advocate for the appellant. Shri Punit Ruparel, Advocate for respondent No. 1. Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel La\vyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 10.02.2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the parties, at the outset, submit that this appeal may be disposed of directing the parties to maintain status quo with regard to suit property till disposal ofthe civil suit which is pending consideration before the trial court. Coiinsel for the parties also pray for a direction to the trial court to decide the said civil suit within a period ofone year. 2. Prayer is reasonable and the same is allowed. 3. Therefore, the appeal is disposed ofand the trial court is directed to dispose of the civil suit, as eariy as possible, preferably within a period of one year j&om the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till then, the parties shall maintain statiis quo with regard to suit property. Both the parties shall co-operate with the trial court for early disposal ofthe case. No order as to costs. Sd/- N.K«A§ JudQe