1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.311 OF 2011. ( RAJKUMAR @ LALJI RAMAWTAR YADAV..VS..DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, NAGPUR & OTH.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. A.M.Rizwy, Advocate for Petitioner. Mrs. B.P.Maldhure, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI AND M.L.TAHALIYANI, JJ. DATE : JUNE 07, 2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner was granted parole on the ground of illness of his wife. He was released on parole on 8th March, 2011. The said period came to be extended on first occasion by fifteen days and again by 15 days. The parole period came to an end around 7th May, 2011. The petitioner is now seeking extension of parole for further two months on the ground that his house is dilapidated and his wife is required to be operated upon. Maximum period that parole can be granted to the prisoner is ninety days. The said period of ninety days expired today. Hence, it is not possible to consider the prayer of the petitioner for further extension of period by 2 months. Thereafter, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the period of parole came to an end on 7th 2 May, 2011 and as parole can be granted for 90 days the period of parole be extended at least till today. It is noticed that on the application of the petitioner he was granted two extensions of fifteen days each. Thereafter the petitioner has not applied for any extension of his period of parole. If the petitioner wanted further extension of parole, he should have preferred application for extension to the concerned authority. He has not preferred any such application and has directly approached this Court seeking extension of parole period. In such case, as the petitioner himself has not applied for extension of the period of parole we are not inclined to grant even this prayer for extension of the period of parole from 8th May, 2011 to 7th June, 2011. The petition is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE RR..