HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4926 of 2010 Date: 26th November 2010 Between : Adakambaru Srinivasulu. …….Petitioner And Talluri Anandamma. ….Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4926 of 2010 ORDER : This civil revision petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed, aggrieved by the order, dated 26.07.2010, passed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nellore, in the Memo filed in I.A.No.157 of 2008 in R.C.C.No.35 of 2006. The petitioner is a tenant. The respondent-landlord filed a petition for eviction under the provisions of the A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960. Earlier, the petitioner has filed an application under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, seeking to send Ex.A-2 letter, dated 09.03.2006, to the handwriting expert, alleging that the signature on the said letter is a forged one. That application was dismissed by orders in I.A.No.157 of 2008, as against which, the petitioner has filed a revision petition in C.R.P.No.2889 of 2009, which also ended in dismissal by an order, dated 15th July 2009, by this Court. It is to be noticed that in the order passed by this Court, it is categorically held that the Court below has considered the application in its proper perspective and rightly declined to send Ex.A-2 to the handwriting expert. In the present memo also, petitioner seeks the very same relief to send the document to the handwriting expert for examination of disputed signatures on Ex.A-2. As much as the similar relief is rejected by the Court below by virtue of dismissal of I.A.No.157 of 2008, which is confirmed by this Court, the Court below has rightly rejected the request of the petitioner in the impugned memo. For the aforesaid reasons, I do not find any illegality in the impugned order, warranting interference of this Court. The revision petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. _____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 26th November 2010 ajr