IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1803 of 2011 DILIP SINGH @ DILIP KUMAR @ DHIRAJ KUMAR @ DHIRAJ Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 16.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 22.07.2010 in connection with killing of six persons. The name of petitioner came in this case in course of investigation, in the confessional statements of co-accused Abhijeet Kumar and Randhir Singh. Subsequently, the petitioner was arrested by the police and he was put on Test Identification Parade. It is stated that petitioner was identified in Test Identification Parade by one witness, namely, Abhisek Kumar but learned counsel for the petitioner drew my attention towards the Test Identification Parade chart, which is Annexure-3 and submitted that there are inconsistent statements in the aforesaid Test Identification Parade Chart. He submitted that in column-2 of the aforesaid Test Identification Parade Chart, it has been mentioned that witness Abhisek Kumar identified the petitioner whereas in column-8, it has been mentioned that witness Abhisek Kumar had identified one Satish Kumar, who was not suspect of the case. It appears from perusal of the impugned order that the aforesaid witness Abhisek Kumar claimed before the police that prior to the alleged occurrence he had seen the petitioner taking tea with the house lady, who was also subsequently murdered. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as 2 well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sessions Trial No. 750 of 2010 arising out of Muzaffarpur Sadar P.S. Case No. 172 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )