IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 4038 of 2009 Decided on: 30.8.2011 Rajneesh Kamal and others …Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioners : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 4. . . Mr. Abhay Kaushal, Advocate, for . respondent No. 5. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. Anup Rattan, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed since the necessary grant-in-aid stands released to him. It is made clear that respondents shall keep on releasing grant-in-aid continuously in future also in case the petitioner is found eligible and suitable. 2. In view of this, the present petition is rendered infructuous and the same is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge August 30, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No