IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 23556 of 2007 Between: 1 Bhongir College of Education, Bhongir, Nalgonda District, represented by its Correspondent Dr.M.Niranjan reddy, S/o Rama Narsi Reddy, R/o Tarnaka, Hyderabad. 2 Vennela Institute of Advanced Study in Education, Suryapet, Nalgonda District, represented by its Correspondent Dr.M.Niranjan Reddy, S/o Rama Narsi Reddy, R/o Tarnaka, Hyderabad. 3 St.George College of Education, Shankerpally, R.R.District, represented by its Correspondent Dr.M.Niranjan Reddy, S/o Rama Narsi Reddy, R/o Tarnaka, Hyderabad. 4 Karunodaya College of Education, Hydershah Kote Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, R.R.District represented byits Correspondent Dr.M.Niranjan reddy, S/o Rama Narsi Redy, R/o Tarnaka, Hyderabad. 5 Madhav Institute of Advanced Study in Education, Bhongir, Nalgonda District represented by its Correspondent Dr.M.Niranjan reddy, S/o Rama Narsi Reddy, R/o Tarnaka, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 State of Andhra Pradesh represented by its Principal secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 Andhra Pradesh State Council of Higher Education Opp:Mahavir Hospital, Mahavir Marg, Masab Tank, Hyderabad represented by its Secretary. 3 Osmania University, Hyderabad, represented by its Registrar. 4 Convener, Ed.CET 2006 Office of A.P., State Council for Higher Education, Opp:Mahavir Hospital, Mahavir Marg, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction preferably a writ in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not approving the names of the students submitted by the petitioners in the statement enclosed to this affidavit, who have been admitted by the petitioner colleges from out of unfilled seats of 80% Convener quota and who have been prosecuting B.Ed.course for the academic year 2006-07 and also the action of the 3rd respondent in not processing the said candidates for the purpose of permitting them to appear for examination to be conducted shortly, as being illegal, arbitrary, contrary to principles of natural justice and violative of article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith approve the admissions of the said students in the petitioner colleges by directing the 3rd respondent to process the applications of the said students for appearing for the examination to be conducted shortly and pass such other order or orders as may deem fit andproper in the circusmtances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.KISHORE Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 23556 OF 2007 ORDER: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition. 2. Permission as sought for is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. ____________________________ Justice B.Seshasayana Reddy 18th June, 2008 KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 23556 OF 2007 18th June, 2008.