3'3?"'tJI'<nd'!1,*®-nl^*re,fqww^i «ii*«Tg»«<i<!»> •^200 an^iv 1<-< mi aii^i *Hi<b y. 311^51 'T39? (•jqtai'i^) K<iwate(3rt?ii (Single Bench; Hon1>le Wt Writ Petition fel No.4635/2007 (Petition under Art.22 PETITIONBt Santosh Aged a| Ayurvedfc College. Dagania, E>istt. Raipur (C6) Versus RESPONbENTS 1. 2. State o] bepcB^m^ Collector 29.01.2009 Mr. Vinod Deshmukh, Advdfpate for the petitioner. Mr. Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Adyo< Heard. 9 ~. This oetition is directed a< Learned counsel for the •*Wtl;l<<1^ >1|t1fff4fe^t A^K ^raiftnati^i . Jwtice t>hirendn» Mishm) of Constitution of Indi<i) Tripcrt-hi, S/o Late 6ogul Prasad Tripathi icut 47 yews, Wo Tdrun Nagar, Behind Chhattisgarh, Through: the Secretm-y, nt of Revenue, &.K.S. Bhawan, ftaipur (C6). Distt. Raipur (C.6.) (ate Seneral for 1+ie Sfate. ainst'the iitipuaned transferorder ddited 29.6.2007 (AnneKureP-^) whereby the petitioner, who is workino as Patwari and posted a^ Patwari Halka No.lOS, Raiour, has been transferr'ed to Patwari (-(atka No.4, &triydbandh, Oistrict Raipur on the administrative yo\^\d. ^etitioner submits that impu9ned transfer ordef could not be. aiye^i effect to due to order of sta-tas quo dated 13.8.2007 passed by tt^is Court. Mr. Thakur, leamed Oepu^y Advocate Seneral for the State also submits that by yirtue of s^atus quo order dated 13.08.07 of aro-^i^to g?»iRRr] -FS/95—11/20U8—1,00,000. T <".3'-':~-:'''^- • 'S^ -WM^ wnl^'is; fsiCTwy 311^1 VI K-\M ^TOT 3Ttt?T "^W^ wqcir a»<(i<t» •WI,200 sn^l '<^S5 (1i?f3^lT) c«iffliff^a <HI^?I -•7-- this Cour-t, the impugned transf^ it relates to the petitioner, coi^l ond in these circumstances. th< dated 29.6.2007 has become lapse of time. l-1e furtiier subtn}t's oetition isaltowedand imouqnedl set aside with libertv to •the S1 the matter of transfer of petiti<( In view of above submissich the instant oetition is allowed Annexure P-2 dated 29.6.2001 petitioner herein, is hereby set at tiberty to pass appropriate petitioner in the eventof admini; Consequently, I.A. No.l; relief also stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rule4 oAd <*l<l!i'l<il-l Hllcif ^lyst <Rnt<;i< I;'sifim sn^i [r order of Annexure P-2, so far as td not be giyen effect to till date tronsfer order of Annexure P-2 i|taaningless &. redundont with the that he has no objection if the Itnmsfer order of Annexure P-2 is |ate to poss approBrMte orders in |ner' under didministrative exigency. of leamed counsel for 1he State, the impugned transfer order of f, so far as it relates to the tiside. Howeyer, the State shall be with regardtp transfer of the i^trative exi9ency: [application for gtaint of interim Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ordlers :^*Til!;»ll<'>1<M-lii(l|M—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000.