o^<2r2(2- IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR .^31^ WRIT PETITION (S) No. /201 O SB PETITIONER Smt.Ruby Darthi Singh W/o Shri. M.Singh, aged about 56 years, Working as Assistant Teacher E.B.A. Mission Primary (Nurs.ery) School, Jagdalpur, District-Bastar (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS A^A ^^y ^wy ^iy ^ ''y ^a^ ,^^^ ^ > " <%? fc?7' \^ J «»1 &<N ^^^ \ ^' .^. ^^ij ^L-.:"-"7 ^TA^,,^ 1. State OfChhattisgarh, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Scool Education, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, District-Raipur (CG) 2. Director, Director ofPublic Instmction, Pensan Bada, District-Raipur (CG) .^" 3. District Education Officer Jagdalpur District-Bastar (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF TIIE CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER WRIT ORDER OR DIRECTIONS DEEMED FIT- 'ysf "^i^i^q, ^ftTm^, [s)diylj,< W^IC'IT W^I^l -^lT/^ ""^^00 3TI^T T^W (li°t^^) ^^^ f<'l1<=h WT ^TTOT'^TRW 'e^TTW^f^T 37T^T <=r)H(<n<I1i ^TR^ft ^ 'fe^l' <Fai<^i< cfratiTO^Tt^ ®B: HO??*BLE MR. JUSTICB PKtTINKER DIWAKBR 29.10.2010 'Kt' Shri.Azad Siddiqui, counse] Shri Ajit Singh, P.L. for th.e| Grievance of tbe petitionei| for t^o advance iQ.crements but on to her for no reasons. He sul .niatters ha.ve been decided bv tlj have been permitted to file a rej order has been filed by fhe petiti(| Counsel for the petitionerj tlie Suprenxe Coiirt in the case] M.P. 8s Others, 2009 |IIS) MPJI^ 1 for fhe petitbiier, State. •is tb-at. th.ough sh,e i.s entitled. the same has not been passed )m.its that n-i.i.niber of i.dentical is Court where the petitioii-ers )resentetioii, copy of one such 'ner as Aiineuxre P/5, •submits tha.t fhe judgnient of of Asha SBKesia Vs. state o.f |8C) 59 aiid orders passed by tliis Court m fhe case of Yasl|.waat Kiimar Bharadwaj Vs. Mimicipa! Corporatioa, Dwg 4 Aaother, 2006 (2| MPJR-CJ 96 aixd in tlie case of Sali^ . Ka.nt Siagh Vs. State of Chhattisgarh 8s> Others, W.P.(8l Ko.5257/08, wherein benefit of two advance ia.creBi.ents has ^een. graB.t.ed cm. th,e ba,sis th.at B.Ed. degree wa.s obtaiiied, is .al{-»o appli.ca.ble to the ca.se ofthe petitiouer, as the .cn'culars sou| who bad obtamed B.Ed/BTI Ti| further submits tli.at he may .lj petition with Mberty to mak] respondent No,3 for deci.dm.g the| ^ht to extend benefst to tliose aiam.g, ]ik.e fh.e petitteiier. He ^e peiiriitted to wi.tli.d.raw th.i.s Tepresesitation before ihe saiiie ia accord.aace. with law. ^ XI-HC—78 *111CTI (h^K^ ^ST ^ww^, w^ww, f«l<vll-y^< .\^:..S:^l^D.:.....k'^L^ J20 ^H^T '<T5R7 (^qt^^sl) 200 a^T^RTf^F ^nw^f^^n^i On the other haiid, counsel has no objection tf tbe petitioner the same is decided ia accordance In view of above, fhe petitio| this petition with- Ubert}^ to fil^ respondent N0.3 and iii tum/tlie| to d.eci.de fhe represeutation. so flle^ cr»i^(<!i<i1i'WT^ff ^f 'fe^st <p3i<^i< '^3tRfH3^T tbr th.e State subniits that he imakes a representation sjid ^zith law, |ier is permitted to witlidraw [ representation before Idie |respoB,dent N0.3 is expected iii accord.an.ee with. law. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge