IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CR No.2446 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision:12.05.2011 M/s Vipan Electrical . . .Petitioner Versus Sushma Jain . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Dewan S. Adlakha, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. This revision petition is directed against order dated 9.3.2011 passed by the learned Rent Controller, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri by which an application filed by the tenant for appointment of Local Commissioner has been declined. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the learned Rent Controller has committed an error in dismissing the application because the landlady in her examination-in-chief has alleged that there exist a shop in the name of Manoj Electronics on the northern side of the shop in question and the shop in question is lying closed since 1.10.2008 whereas neither there exist any shop on the northern side of the shop in question in the name and style of Manoj electronics nor it is lying closed as alleged, therefore, this fact could have been easily proved with the appointment of Local Commissioner. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the record, I am of the view that there is no error in the impugned order because Local Commissioner cannot be appointed for the purpose of collecting evidence of either of the parties, who are required to prove their case on their own. In view thereof, the revision petition is totally devoid of any merit and as such the same is hereby dismissed. No costs. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) MAY 12, 2011 JUDGE Vivek