IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2373 of 2010 Bibi Fatma Khatoon Versus State Of Bihar & Ors. ----------- 4 29.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party-Bank. It is submitted that the petitioner is receiving fifty per cent of the family pension and the remaining fifty per cent is being paid to the daughter of the second wife. The grievance of the petitioner is that the amount which is lying with the Bank also deserves to be paid to this petitioner to the extent of fifty per cent. Learned counsel appearing for the Bank submits that the daughter of the second wife had also approached this Court with similar grievance vide Civil Review No. 131 of 2010 which was disposed of by this Court permitting the petitioner of the said case to approach the Bank, and as such, the petitioner herein may also be permitted to approach the Bank and thereafter her claim would be considered as per the extant rules/instructions of the Bank and admissible payments would be made to the rightful claimants. In the above circumstances, petitioner is permitted to approach the Bank for the aforesaid claim. In case petitioner approaches the Bank, the same may be considered in accordance with law expeditiously under the extant rules/instructions of the Bank. The MJC application accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)