HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Single Bench Applicant Resppnden't Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. Civil Revision No.130/2008 Ledhwaram, S/o Late Heeratal Sahu, Aged about 56 Years, Resident of Lawan, Tahsil - Baloda Bazaar, District - Raipur (Chhattisgarh Versus Gangotri Bai, W/o Ledhwaram, Aged about 51 years, Resident of Mahamai Chowk, Lawan, Tahsil - Baloda Bazaar, District-Raipur(C.G. Civil Revision under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code Present : Applicant by Shri Prakash Tiwari, Advocate. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 18" August, 2008) Heard on admission. 2. The appticant is aggrieved by the order dated 16.06.2008 passed by the 2nd Additional District Judge, Baloda Bazaar in Civil Suit No.27- A/2007 whereby maintenance pendente lite and expenses of proceedings were cumulatively awarded against the applicant. 3. Shri Prakash Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant drew attention of this Court to the impugned order wherein the learned 2 Additional District Judge has recorded a submission by the non- applicant/wife that if the applicant was willing to give an undertaking that he would not, in any manner, interfere with the agricultural operations including harvesting the crop grown by the non-applicant/wife on the land in area 1.492 hectares, she would not claim maintenance pencfente A'fe. 4. Shri Prakash Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant was willing to givei^ an undertaking before the 2" Additional District Judge, Baloda Bazaar to the effect that the applicant would not, in any manner, interfere with the possession of the non- applicant/wife over the land in area 1.492 hectares. It was also submitted that the applicant would give a specific undertaking before the learned 2 Additional District Judge, Baloda Bazaar that he would also not interfere in the agricultural operations and harvesting the crop grown by the non- appticant/wife thereon. He further submitted that he would make an application before 25th August, 2008 before the learned 2" Additionat District Judge for modifiGation of the impugned order dated 16.06.2008 on ^ the said undertaking and prayed that the effect and operation of the impugned order should be stayed only till 25 August, 2008. He further prayed that this Civil Revision be disposed of in view of the submission mentioned above. 5. Purely as an interim measure, it is ordered that the effect and operation ofthe impugned orderdated 16.06.2008 passed in Civil Suit No. 27-A/2007 shall remain stayed till 25th August, 2008. The applicant shall be at liberty to make an application and give an undertaking, as prayed for by the learned counsel for the applicant, before the learned 2" Additional District Judge, Baloda Bazaar. 6. With the said observation, this Civil Revision is disposed of. Certified copy of the impugned order dated 16.06.2008 be returned to the applicant on furnishing xerox copy of the same. _^_ C. c. today. Sd/— Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge Anjani