1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4600 OF 2009. ( Mr. Avinash F. Sahakar -: versus :- Dilipkumar P. Parakha and others ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : NOVEMBER 21, 2009. Heard Shri S.S. Ghate, learned counsel for petitioner. Respondent/landlord wanted petitioner/tenant to vacate on the ground of bonafide need. Both the Courts have held that he has succeeded in proving the need. The aspect of comparative hardship is also considered. The contention before me is, bonafide need is not in existence because the respondent has already occupied two shop blocks on ground floor and some photographs are sought to be shown to this Court, to contend that they show occupation of 2 shop blocks on ground floor by landlord. It is admitted position that the situation prevailing on the date of landlords evidence has not changed. The evidence of landlord was therefore perused and it is seen that this alleged extinguishment of bonafide need is not put to landlord at all. On the contrary, the 2 landlord has in cross accepted that one room on ground floor was in his occupation, but it was required as garage. In these circumstances, it is clear that no case is made out for interference in the matter in exercise of writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE Rgd.