IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30244 of 2010 1. AMBIKA MAHATO 2. SUDAMA MAHATO, BOTH ARE THE SONS OF LATE DURWAL MAHATO. 3. UMARAWATI DEVI, WIFE OF AMBIKA MAHATO 4. SHEONATH MAHATO SON OF SUDAMA MAHATO, ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SAMPUR, P.S. JAMO, DISTRICT SIWAN. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02. 07.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence under Sections-498A, 420, 406/34 of the Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are ready and willing to continue the matrimonial relationship with the complainant and to that effect they shall file written undertaking on affidavit in the court below within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order in the court below. No sooner the petitioners above named file such undertaking on affidavit, they be admitted to the privilege of provisional bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri D.K. Tiwary, J.M., Ist Class, Gopalganj in connection with Complaint Case No.971 of 2009, Tr. No.1568 of 2010, thereafter notice be issued to the complainant and once 2 she appears petitioners in presence of the court should persuade her to come back to the matrimonial home not only by words of mouth but also with suitable conduct and gesture which should generate confidence in her. In the event, complainant comes back to the matrimonial home or the matrimonial dispute is resolved or the complainant is found to be unreasonable, provisional bail allowed to the petitioners should be confirmed, failing which the court below should pass appropriate order in accordance with law considering the reasonableness of the stand of the parties. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. Let this order be communicated to the court below through fax on payment of usual charges by the petitioners. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)