mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1206 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1912 OF 2007 Mahanand S. Tiwari .. Petitioner versus Ramlakhan S. Tiwari .. Respondent ... Mr.Sushil Shukla for the applicant. Mr.M.U. Pandey for respondent no.1. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J DATED : 25th July 2008 P.C.: 1. As per the office notings, respondent has been duly served by courier. Advocate for the respondent however submits that he has no instructions in that regard. Application has been filed as back as in July 2007. Respondent has not chosen to instruct his advocate nor taken steps to file reply affidavit. As a result, application has to proceed as it is. This application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) with clear understanding that if the respondent intends to carry out any alterations or additions to the suit premises hereafter, shall take prior permission of this court which request shall be considered on its own merits. 2. In the event respondent has already carried out any alterations or additions in the suit premises it will be open to the petitioner to ask for appropriate relief as may be advised which request may be considered on its own merits. 3. Application is disposed off in the above terms. (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)