IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 5485 of 2006 Between: B. Yadamma W/o Rajaram R/o. Ramanujapuram, Narsimhulupet Mandal, Warangal District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Assistant Director of Fisheries Warangal, Warangal District. 2 The Divisional Panchayat Officer, Mahabubabad, Warangal District. 3 The District Panchayat Officer, Warangal, Warangal District. 4 The Fishermen Cooperative Society, Peddamupparam, Narsimhulapet Mandal, Warangal District, Rep. by its President .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings dt. 1-3-2006 in letter No.220/D/2006 issued by the 1st Respondent and also the consequential proceedings dt. 3-3-2006 in Memo No. 98/A2/2006 issued by the 2nd respondent as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents to permit the Gram Panchayat, Ramanujapuram, Narsimhulupet Mandal, Warangal District to hold public auction in respect of fishery rights of tank situated within its limits and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.PRABHAKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR FISHERIES The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 5485 of 2006 O R D E R: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that since the lease period has already expired, the cause in the writ petition is does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI,J Date: 23-07-2008 KLP