IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 23RD MARCH 2007 / 2ND CHAITHRA 1929 WP(C).No. 6885 of 2007(T) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- SIVADASAN. M., MADATHIL HOUSE, ARIKULAM POST, KOYILANDY. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, VATAKARA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, VATAKARA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. N.SUDHADEVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO: 6885/2007 T APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1. COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF PERMIT DT. 7/2/2006 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS. EXT.P2. COPY OF THE REQUEST DT. 31/1/2007 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R2. True copy tga K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR,J. ------------------------------------------ WP(C)NO.6885 OF 2007-T ------------------------------------------ Judgment The petitioner submitted Ext.P1 application for replacement of his vehicle, operating on the route Koyilandy-Kozhikode. In fact, the petitioner wanted renewal of the permit. But, by mistake, the application was submitted as one for replacement. Later, he filed Ext.P2 application to modify Ext.P1. The prays, Ext.P1, as modified by Ext.P2, may be disposed of without delay. 2. I heard the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents also. The Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P1 as modified by Ext.P2, in accordance with law within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. 23.03.2007 K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR,JUDGE sta 2