Viif<^ OF AT Writ Petition i'C] No. of .?L s?a T^ I a Petitioner Versus ResDondents 4. Smt. Chandravsti Devi, W/o. Mohar La!. aged about 36 years, Up Sarpanch, Gram Panchayl Barbuspur, Distt. s f-r- n \ tw.^.. State of Chhattisaarh Throuah - The Secretary, Department of Panchayat, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) Coliector, Surguja (C.G.) Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Pratappur, Disti. Surguja t'l". f; I.^-U-J Vijay Kumar, aged about 40 years, R/o. Village : Barbaspur, Former Secretary, Janpaa Kancnayat baraspur, usstt. Surauja ?C.S.) ton'bie Justice Shri K. Present: Mr. Sourabh Dangi, counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Deepaii Pandey, Panei !av<yer Tor the respondents No. 1 an' 2/Staffi ^. on this 12th day of Apri!, By this petition, the petitioner, who is Up-Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat, Barbaspur, Dlstrict Surguja, seeks a peculiar prayer that the responclents be directed to act in accordance with iav/ i.e. to !ook in to the rnatter of rssisnation bv the Secretary and aDDoint a ne'.v Secretarv immediatsly under the provisions of Section 89 of Chhattisgarh Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993. Accordina to th's oetltioner, the resoondent No. 4 tendered his rssianation from the office of the Panchayat Secretary on 16.8.2006 (P/1). The said resianation was acceDted bv the Gram Panchavat in its meet'no., held on 21.9.06, which was aDDroved bv the Gram Sabha on 3.10.06. The petitioner has written a ietter to the Chief Executive Officer, Districf A Panchavat, Surauja/resDondent No. 3 fp/3') and fhsreafter to the Coilec-tor. Surguja, but no date is mentioned in both the ietters. !t is not clear astc. v./hy the competent officer i.e. Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat has not written to the concerned officer, as stated- above, for passing of the appropriate ordsr, in terms of the resoiution passed by the Gram Panchavat and ths Gram Sabha. The writ petition is vague and iacks material facts. The Gram Panchayat is reoresented through the Saroanch and as such for aDDropriate order. the Sarpanch oug'nt to have written to the concerned officer l.e. respondent No. 3 for passina aoDi'opriate order, whjch has not been done in the present case. For want of mater'al, no ora'er can be passed. in v!ew ofthe abovs, this pstition is d'sm'ssed summariiy. Sd/- iK.Agnihotrs Judge