IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39119 of 2009 MUKHTAR, S/o Late Salim. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 11.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner may have been driving the motorcycle at the time of occurrence but he disputes ownership of the same and in fact that belongs to one Vinay Kumar who had given it to the petitioner on a temporary basis, let the petitioner above named who is in custody since 12.08.2009 and has no criminal antecedent be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with Barsoi P.S. Case No. 102 of 2009 (G.R. No. 1555 of 2009) subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner - 2 - who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)