msm—ii' :ii! i ^"s y ^&ff::.^:^;Sii» Cp- %7 %a' ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 1 105 of2009 Surendar Singii Chawla, S/o Shri Gyaii Singii Chawla, aged about 38 yeai-s, Wo Gyan House, Station Para, Ward No^. 12 Maliasamund, Distt. Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh). RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Department of Genei-al Adininistration, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). 2. The Higii Level Caste Scmtiny Comauttee TSirougli Chairman,DKS Bhavvan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). 3. The Collector, District Mahasamund (CG). 4. Sub Division OfHcer, (Revenue), Mahasainund, Disti'ict Mahasamund (CG). 5. Kamal Kumar Tamboli S/o Dhaniram Tamboli. R/o Kunnipara, Mahasamund, Distt. Mahasamund (CG). (VvTUT PETmON LTMDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTTTLmON OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Asnihoti-i. J.) Present : Shri Prakash Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Vinay Harit, Deputy Advocats General forthe State. (Passed on 26 day Jl 1. With tlie consent ofthe parties, the mattei- is taken up for hearing fmally. 2. Shri Viaay Harit, Deputy Advocate General appearing for tlie State submits fhat Hieh Power Caste Scmtinv Comtnittee (for sliort 'the Conimittee') shall : consider aiid decide ttie case of the petitioner, m accordance with law, having considered all aspects.offhe matter, as mandated by the Supreme Court in various decisions. 3. In view ofthe foregoing, no direction can be issued to the respondent to decide the matter within tfae stipulated tiine as is pointed out by the 3afc 1>^ tC\. 4. petitioner himsett that the case oftlie petitioner has been sent to the State of Punjab for some inquiry. However, in view ofthe tacts situation ofthe case, the respoiident No. 2 may consider the case ofthe petitioner as early as possible. With the above dh-ection, this petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge