0/6) F S.B. (Service Matter) IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITIONS) NOS’BM /2010. 1; ' PEHTIONER: F.R.Yadav, son of Late Madhusudan Ram Yadav, aged about 48 years, working as Lecturer at Govt. Boys Higher Secondary School, Bagicha, Block Bagicha, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. VCI‘SuS =/ Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Chhattisgarh, Raipur. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jashpur, Chhattisgarh Principal, Govt. Boys Higher Secondary School, Bagicha, Block Bagicha, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 5. Joint Director Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Ambikapur, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. “as M- RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA , W mm E123m WW WHEY fgérW r é; aimwim SB : HON’BLE MR. JUSTECE PFITINKER DEWAKER 17.09.2010 Shri C.J.K.’Rao, counsel fc r the petitioner. Shri Vaibhav Q-olverdhan, P53, for the State, Griévance of the petitioner ‘n the present petition is that though he is entitled to getthe benefxt OF Rule 2A D of fundamenh‘ rules, on the basisof various euculals (Annex. res P/2 81s P/3) 1ssued by the State Government, till date same has not been granted . Contention ,of the cotjr‘sel for the petitioner is that his representation (Annexure P/4) dated 6.8.2010 is already pending and ends of justice would be served if at this stage, the petitioner is permitted to Withdraw the petitinn with a direction to the respondent N03 to decide the. pending representation. State counsel has no 0)jection if the representation of the petitioner is decided strictiy in accordance with law. - In View of the above, the ipresent petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent NO. to decide the pending representation of the petitioner as expeditiousl as possible. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the a thority concerned would be at liberty to decide the representation in ccordance with law.