IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3796 of 2009 GOPAL PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 09.09.2009 The case is under Section 20(b) of the NDPS Act. Heard. The petitioner’s prayer for bail has been rejected earlier thrice vide orders dated 9.3.2006, 16.11.2006 and 9.10.2007 in respective Cr. Misc. Nos. 6902 of 2006, 47004 of 2006 and 42703 of 2007 on the ground that 22 kgs of ganja was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Today no fresh ground is urged excepting that the petitioner is in custody since 15.10.2005. It is also submitted that till date one witness ha been examined by the trial court. The learned counsel also says that in the chemical examiners’ report regarding the recovered ganja has not been received. The learned A.P.P. submitted that recovered ganja is in commercial quantity. He also submits that the report of the chemical examiner is awaited. In the facts and circumstances, I do not feel inclined to allow bail the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. (C. M. Prasad, J.) Ravi/-