cra35.11 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 35 OF 2011 Mohd. Manzur Ahmed s/o Mohemood Siddiqui and Anr. ...Petitioners Versus Muzafar Abbas s/o Mohd. Dildar and Ors. ...Respondents ..... Mr. S.S. Sayed, advocate for the petitioners ..... CORAM: R.M. BORDE, J. DATED: 5TH APRIL, 2011 PER COURT:- 1 The petitioners are raising exception to the interim order passed by the Wakf Tribunal on 18.1.2011 directing impleadment of the petitioners as defendants in the suit presented by the original plaintiffs- respondents herein. I have perused the order and heard arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 2 It is not disputed that petitioner No.1 has presented Succession proceeding before the Atiyat Court at Vaijapur and is claiming interest in the disputed property. The proposed defendants, petitioners herein cra35.11 -2- have claimed their entitlement to the property and as such it is essential to implead them as party defendants in the suit presented by the plaintiffs claiming relief of recovery of possession. In my view, the proposed defendants are necessary and proper parties to the suit. 3 In this view of the matter, no fault can be attributed to the order passed by the Trial court allowing the application presented by the original plaintiffs-respondents herein. Civil Revision Application is without any merits and same therefore, stands rejected. ( R.M. BORDE. J.) rlj/