IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No.38155 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 16, 2011 Archana Mishra ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.A.R.Takkar, Advocate with Ms.Meghna Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The impugned order is revisable. Let the petitioner, at the first instance, file a revision against the impugned order before the Court of Sessions. Counsel contends that bailable warrants have been issued for the presence of the petitioner. Let the petitioner appear before the trial Court on the date fixed. Thereafter, she would be at liberty to file an application seeking exemption, which shall be considered in accordance with law by the trial Court. Order dasti on payment. December 16, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE