ingm §emh ' IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATrISGARH AT BILASPUR_(C.G.) CR. M. P. No. (33/9 OF 2010 PETITIONER Manoj Kumar Dewangan Son of APPLICANT Shri Kejuram Dewangan, House No. 383, Simga, District Raipur (C.G.), through General Power of Attorney Kamal Kishore \)3>‘ \\ ’Jw .' Dewangan Son of Shri Dashrath Dewangan, aged about 31 years, 15’ Qte‘é‘xe“ wgw:3Q ¢/\ Address Quarter No. 16B, S.P.A. Sector 5, Bhilai, Police Station Sector 6 Kotwaii, Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENT NON-APPLICANT State of Chhattisgarh, through Police Station Kotra Road, Raigarh (C.G.). PETITION UNDER SECTION 482/01: THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 S 3a WW, WW, Cfmpg.W m20¢0 WWWt‘r'fsém *aifzmm 22.07.2010: Shri‘ R‘a’jniS‘H‘Baghel counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ph/eg D5§ y. GA for the respondent. w -CounselJggtQefpetitioner submits that the vehicle in question was seized on 04.08.2009 but t 1h“. K m H 1 ‘\.‘f:t_t fiie'd: against the accused pers could not be released. r. CouniseHor the respont wouldLb‘e ma%é’bv&the State Go possible. He submits that the before thevMagisttate for releas ‘u ~".-. anri V \ vii lent very fairly submits that an effort vernment to file the aha/Ian as early as petitioner may file a fresh application ng the vehicle on Supurdginama. half: :m.;.u 'n—J, State Government to file the cha/Ian as early as possible preferably within a period of two months f State Government, the petitir )ner would be at liberty to file an application before the Magis; Supurdginama. l r is disposed of with a direction to the Accordingly the petition ll date the charge sheet has not been ons as a result of which the vehicle om today. On that being done by the trate for releasing the vehicle on w» Sd/— ?ritinker Diwaker 1 Judge l W $01? ggnrmr, pea (airs E‘s/l47‘y20m $1,004,“). .