WP(C) 4234/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B. K. SHARMA According to the petitioner, he has not been paid salary since April, 20 05. I have heard Mr. M. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. P.N.Goswami, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department. Mr. Goswami, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department, submits tha t there is some doubt regarding genuinity or otherwise of the appointment of the petitioner. In this connection, he has referred to the decision of this Court r eported in (2006) 2 GLT 216 (Sudhendu Mohan Talukdar and others Vs. State of Ass am & Ors), in which direction was issued to scrutinize such claim of teachers. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of providing that th e case of the petitioner may be scrutinized by the Committee constituted under t he said judgement. The Committee may make necessary scrutiny and pass necessary orders, as expeditiously as possible. With the above directions and observations, the writ petition stands dis posed off, without however, any order as to costs.