1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL(W)NO.399/2001 State of Rajasthan & Anr. Vs. Gauri Shanker & Anr. Date of Judgment :: 17-01-2008 HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. NARAYAN ROY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr. Shyam Ladhrecha, Government Advocate. Mr. Rajeev Purohit, for the respondent. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the order impugned. It appears that on concession given by learned counsel for the parties, the writ application was disposed of with certain observations. Against the consent order, there could not have been appeal filed on behalf the State. However, it is submitted that observation made in the order impugned to the effect “both the learned counsel for the parties also submitted that the notification will not operate retrospectively” was quite unwarranted. Since order impugned is based on consent given by the parties, no interference is required. This appeal accordingly is dismissed. However, the observations as quoted above shall be without prejudice to the interest of the parties. [MOHAMMAD RAFIQ],J. [NARAYAN ROY],CJ. Praveen