IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONERS M / /1. Krishan Gopal Bhardwaj son of Shri Resham Lal Bhardwaj, aged about 41 years, Upper Division Teacher, Government Middle School, Ghunchapur Block Podi—Uproda District Ko'rba (co) Kamal Kuinar Khunte son of Shri Firatu Ram Khunte aged about 41 years, Upper Division Teacher, Government Boys Middle School, Chhuri Block Katghora District Korba (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Deportment D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Deportment, Raipur District Rajpur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Deportment, Korba District Korba (C.G.) r WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE p CONSTITUTION OF INDIA I W WRIT PETITIONJS) NOQQS?/2010 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PET1?}ON (S) No‘ 2057 of 2010 : Krishna Gopai Bhardwa} 8: anoiher. VERSUS PETWONER RESPONDENTS 1 State of Ch’hattisgarh & Others. WRH’ PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTlTUTiON OF {NDIA SB: Hen’b!e Shn Satash K. Agmhotri.i Present: Shri Somkani \I’erma. Advocate appearing on behah‘ of Shri Amit Kumar Sharma‘ Advocate for the petitioner. $hr§ NNRay, P.L. for the Statei‘a'e3p0ndents. ORDER {ORAL} (Passed on 30m day of Rpm, 2010) 1. By this petition, the petitioners seek a direction to the reepondents to pay two advance increments on passing of 8.1!. examination, on their own expenses, before entering into'service. k3 Learned counsei appearing for the petiiioners submits that the issue involved in the present case is no ionger res infegra as the same has been coneidered and decided by the Supreme Court in Ashe Saxena 1/. 5mm 0fMP. & Ore. ’ LO Learned counsei further submits that the instant petition is squareiy covered by the decision as atorestated. Thus, the petitioners may be permitted to make representations to the respondent authorities to decide their cases for grant of two increments in the iight of aforestated decision, subject to verification of the fact of possession of B.T.i. certificate on their own expenses before entering into service. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that in the event, the petitioners make representation, the same wiil be considered and decided, in accordance with iaw and in the iight of the decision otthe Supreme Court in Ashe 3axena (supra) within a period oi tour weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 5. in View of foregoing, according to the iearned counsei appearing for the petitioners. nothing survives in this petition tor adjudication. 6. Accordingiy, the writ petition is disposed of. Sdl- Amit Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ‘ 20'09 (in) MPH/t (so; 59