IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P.(T) No. 16467 of 2008. Decided on 18th July, 2011. _____________________________________________________ Krishna Sharma. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment dated 16th December, 2010, rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in Narbada Devi Vs. State of H.P. & others. C.W.P. No. 5831 of 2010. 2. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to do the needful as per the principles laid down in the judgment cited hereinabove, within a period of ten weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge July 18, 2011. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 - - 3 - `