1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition NO.3844/2010 Sachin Santosh Jadav and another Vs. Sanjay Kisanrao Jadhav and another. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr. C. A. Joshi, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr. Rohit Joshi, Adv. for respondents 1 and 2. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. NOVEMBER 26, 2010. Heard Advocate C. A. Joshi for the petitioner and Advocate Rohit Joshi for respondents 1 and 2. Respective counsel were heard on earlier occasion. Today Advocate Rohit Joshi makes statement upon instructions that respondents do not wish to lead any additional evidence to support the inclusion of property added as plaint property because of impugned order dated 3rd April 2010 passed below Exhibit 172. In view of this statement, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter in writ jurisdiction. With liberty to challenge impugned order after suit is finally decided if occasion therefor arises, present writ petition is rejected. JUDGE ambulkar