IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25341 of 2009 MINTU SAHI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2/ 25/07/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. In this application for cancellation of bail granted to O.P. No.2, it is submitted that, in fact, no notice was served on the petitioner before the court below and, therefore, her non-appearance noticed in the order of this Court dated 25.5.2009 in Cr. Misc. No.3959/09 granting bail to the O.P. No.2 on that ground stands explained. In the absence of any allegations of fraud or misuse of bail, this Court finds it difficult to issue notice in this application for cancellation of bail. The submission on behalf of the petitioner is that she is still willing to go back to the matrimonial home. O.P. No.2 had taken a specific stand before this Court during the hearing of his bail application for revival of matrimonial harmony considering which he came to be granted anticipatory bail. It appears that both of them are now willing to revive matrimonial harmony. The stand taken by O.P. No.2 leading to grant of anticipatory bail is a matter to 2 be appropriately kept in mind by the court below during trial and expeditiously conclude the trial preferably within six months without grant of unnecessary adjournments now that both of them appear to be keen for revival of matrimonial harmony. The application is disposed in the aforesaid terms. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)