APPLICANT: ^' ^ ^i. n^^. ^^. V-^., ;,J,'< IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Contempt Case (Civil) No. ^i /2011 Laxmi Kant Bharti Aged about 52 years, S/o Shri Siya Ram Bharti, Occupation Assistant Professor (Economics), R/0 Qua.no.S-H, Street no.5, Sector-4, Bhilai, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS ^....<^-1 €S? ...^" :c^^ ^'.::^v'^^ ^ •s^" ..^" ^.A^-<" Ov-^ \\ NON-APPLICANT: CONTEMNOR M. K. Raut The then Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Presently posted as Secretary, School Education and Public Works Department Mantralaya, D.K.S. Building, Raipur (C.G.) K.D.P. Rao The Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) PETITION UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The followmg is respectfully submitted on behalf of the applicant: ^n^T^fR^N? ^iT 3>TT^?T 5h*iicft Tumane '3~^ ^(^j<n^, ^Til^^Ko, [®(<ni^^< Ccr^A-C^^tO'^-^l^l ^ffWll^»Wcfr 200 3TT^T TR^ (<jqi^^T) i^TW^ri^r 3?n^T SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohad 29-07-2011 Shri Jitendra Pali, counsel for| Shri Pawan Shrivastava, court Shri Ghanshyam Patel, cc{ Abhishek Sinha, counsel for respon^ Learned counsel for the applit dated 06-07-2011, order of theCdi there is some delay. He further subrt- be directed to implement the order. On the other hand, learne<|l submitted that since the State Gd^ 06-07-2011 in favour of the petitiont all the benefits, which has been orderdated 06-07-2011. Statement made by learned] placed on record and it is expect^d extend the benefit to the petitioner, In view of the aforesaid factsl to proceed further in the matter. Rul^ Accordingly, thepetition is fin^i a|s <=M<4t<n<fli *ii^<viT'^'fe^ <Ft^i< '^'3i^H3^^r Shrivastava, J. |the applicant. |isel for respondent No.1. [unsel appears on behalf of Shri lent No.2. |;ant submits that by issuing the order |urt has been complied with, though |iits that the respondent authority may counsel for the respondent No.1 Ivernment has passed the order on ^r, the petitioner would be entitled to st^ted by the State Government in its counsel for the respondent No.1 is that the State Government shall per order dated 06-07-2011. and circumstances, 1 am not inclined is therefore discharged. illy disposed off. Sd/- ManindraMohan Shrivastava Judge ^Tracfi^^^rggun^r, <|^I^IM—FS/140—2/2011—1,50,000.