IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 707 of 2011 and CWP No.711 of 2011. Date of decision: 24.02.2011. CWP No.707 of 2011. Ram Singh ….. Petitioner. Vs. State of H.P. and ors. …. Respondents. CWP No.711 of 2011. Hira Singh …..Petitioner. Vs. State of H.P and ors. …..Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the Petitioners : Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. for respondents. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners are aggrieved since they have not been granted the work charge status. According to them, the case is covered by the decision of this Court in Phool Maya Vs. State of H.P. rendered in CWP (T) No.10220 of 2008. It is for the second respondent to examine the matters. Therefore, both the writ petitions are disposed of as follows :- - 2 - 2. There will be a direction to the second respondent to look into the matters in light of the decision of this Court in Phool Maya’s case (supra) and take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and a copy of the judgment, referred to above, by the petitioner(s). 3. In view of the above directions, the writ petitions are disposed of so also the pending application (s), if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice (Justice V.K. Ahuja) February 24, 2011. Judge (tilak/cs)