BEFORETHEHON'BLEHIGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARHAT fiitAspim M.G.C.^0. \3°1 ^2009 « In W.P. Nt>. 2774 / 1995 (Dismissed for want of prosecution on 17/04/06) APPLICANT SarvajeetSen Aged about 34 Years (now 48 years ), S/o Late Shri P. Sen Qfficer, Bilaspur Raipur l^ . umcer' _ts"aspur F'^'r^vA-^ Kshetriya Gramiin Bank, Branch ii«.........--"»",^.^••"'" Hasaud, DJstrictBileispur,C.G. •"" '~L.« inl SW -*i??' <-1^.- (Now Present AddressQtr.No. ^'^:^^ ,«)**."•""••'""^ (Now Present Address Qtr. 15 A, Guruku 1 Parisar, Kallbacli, Raipur, C.G.) VERSUS ^" NON-AfPLICANTS: 1. Bilaspur,-Raipur, ;,l Kshetriya Gramin Bank, through its Chairman Dayalband, Gurudwara Bhawan, Bilaspur - 495001 (M.P;) { NowChhattisgarh Gramin Barik tKrough Its Chairman, Choubey Colony, Geeta Nagar Raipur, C.G.} 2. Chairman BUaspur, - Raipur, Kshetriya Gramin Bank, Dayalband, Gurudwara Bhawan;Bilaspur- 495001 (M.P.) { Now Chairman, Chhattisgarb Gramin Bank Choubey Colony, Geeta Nagar Raipur, C.G.} APPUCATION FOR REStOftATICtN OF THE CASE Theapplicant hamedabove named begs t6 submits as under :- X •s^. ^ M.C.C. No. 199 APPUCANt NON-APLICANTS SanajeetSen. VER8V8 Slaspiu: Rmpur Kriietriya Cteamm BaBk&aaother. APPUCA'nON FOR RESTORATICm CT THE CASE. SB:Hon'l Present: ShriSatyeadraSatM.Atooeatefwtheqipltcant. Shri Suaiit Verma, Advoeate fwthe n<Mi-a^)ltcmits. Anrit ^; ORALOMDER (Passed oa 16U day dF March, 2010) ©fdelayia filing Heard on I.A. No. t, applicatron for Testoration applieation. In repfy to tiw above appboalacm, the wm-affKeaaa^BsmSt bss not pointed out any faet thatafter diamssal oftiie 'wait p^ti<»,s<asae aew rig^its have accrued in fevour of any peraoa ar condonation oftlday woutd prgu^ce the intCTed: and ri^rts rf'flie aon-<q>pB<auts©adi:GT asy person. The sole (Ajecti<Mi raised by &e nmi-fCTBcants/BsA is ^sset •Qae delay is on accoutrt of cMelesmess on the psatof'Qse spp&oaat w flB applieaut's advoeate. Having cmisidered the response, delay in filiag flie restoratKna applicati<»is condoned, subject to paymait af a eod; <rf Rs. 300@A to fhe non-applicants/Bank. Leamed counsel a^earing fi>r the applicatttsHhmitsthatliie c<»B»setior the applicaat could aot appea- on aceouHt of bona ftde mistafce, thaefore, W.P No.2774/1995, vrfueh was ^anissed on l'fh ^prfl, 2006 may be restored to its fiie. Reasonable and suffieient em.ise has been shown; W.P No. 2774/1995 is restoredto the ori^nal file. *. Acopy ofthis order be placed on reewd oflfae origiaal writ petltioii and Ifaesamebelistedforhearing. ^ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge