IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT MONDAY, THE 1ST DECEMBER 2008 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 12965 of 2008(R) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- SUNIL GEORGE, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O.LATE GEORGE, RESIDING AT PARUMOOTTIL, M.O.WARD, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.C.V.MANUVILSAN SRI.P.G.SURESH SRI.G.SUDHEER (THURAVOOR) RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR, VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT ANNEX, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE DY. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU,ALAPPUZHA. 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU,KOTTAYAM. 6. THE DIRECTOR, LOCAL FUND AUDIT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. S.U.NAZAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/12/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.12965/2008 R APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BEFORE THE THEN CHIEF MINISTER SUBMITTED ON 07/04/2005. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF AUDIT REPORT OF ALAPPUZHA MUNICIPALITY. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DTD. 15/03/2008 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE AUDIT REPORT DONE BY THE OFFICE OF LOCAL FUND AUDIT DY.DIRECTOR, ALAPPUZHA. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: EXT.R1(A): COPY OF THE FIR REGISTERED IN V.C.NO.8/08/ALP. EXT.R1(B): COPY OF THE FIR IN V.C.NO.9/08/ALP. /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss R. BASANT, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.C.No. 12965 of 2008 R - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 1st day of December, 2008 JUDGMENT The learned Prosecutor, after taking instructions, submits that after conducting a proper enquiry Crime Nos. VC 8 of 2008 and V.C. 9 of 2008 of Alleppey Vigilance and Anti Corruption Bureau has been registered and investigation is in progress. In the light of that submission, which I accept, I am satisfied that no further directions are necessary at this juncture in this writ petition. 2. Accepting the submissions of the learned Prosecutor, this writ petition is dismissed. I may hasten to observe that the dismissal of this writ petition will not in any way fetter the rights of the petitioner to approach this court again at a later stage, if proper investigation is not conducted. (R. BASANT) Judge tm