IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31742 of 2010 CHANDAN PASWAN, S/o Late Ayodhi Paswan @ Fudi Paswan. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.31763 of 2010 CHANDAN PASWAN, S/o Late Ayodhi Paswan @ Fudi Paswan. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 21.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code and later on Section 411 IPC was added. It has been submitted that the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report and subsequently when the petitioner was arrested in another case he is said to have given a confessional statement on the basis of which the mobile and the Laptop was recovered from the possession of Dheeraj and Sikandar. Considering the nature of allegations, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The prayer for bail is rejected in connection with Begusarai Town P.S. Case Nos. 73 of 2010 and 54 of 2010 respectively. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it positively within a period of six months. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)