IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12274 of 2011 1. PARSHURAM MAHTO @ DHOLI 2. MUKESH KUMAR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 05.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code and 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accusation is that for the business transaction, the petitioners took Rs. 80,000/- from the complainant, for which, two cheques of Rs. 50,000/- and Rs. 10,000/- were issued, which subsequently got bounced. The petitioners are ready to deposit the cheque amount of Rs. 60,000/-, before the learned court below within a period of six months which will be invested in some fix deposit schemes which will be subject to the result of the case. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above 2 named petitioners, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Patna City in connection with Complaint Case No. 286/2001, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The bail bond of the petitioners will be provisionally accepted which will be finally accepted on deposit of the aforesaid money. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)