1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.760 OF 2003 Airlift (India) Pvt. Ltd. .... Plaintiffs. V/s M/s. Saral Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. ..... Defendants. Mr. Madhav D. Johari, Accountant of Plaintiffs, present. CORAM: V. M. KANADE, J. DATE : 18TH JANUARY, 2010 P.C.:- 1. Plaintiffs’ representative submits that relative of the advocate on record has expired. He seeks four weeks’ time. The matter is shown under the caption of dismissal under Rule 227 of the High Court (Original Side) Rules.. Though suit is filed in the year 2003, the summons for judgment has not been taken out by plaintiffs within six months from the date of service of writ of summons. 2 Suit, therefore, does not survive. Suit is dismissed in view of Rule 227 of the High Court (Original Side) Rules. (V.M. KANADE, J.) 2