IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 19TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 28TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 27736 of 2008(B) -------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 22/07/2008 IN IA.271/2008 IN RCP.58/2005 of MUNSIFF-MAGISTRATE COURT,PONNANI .................... PETITIONER: ------------ ACHIPRA VALAPPIL K.V.HARIS S/O. KUNHIBAPPUTTY, EDAPPAL AMSOM THUYYAM DESOM, PONANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRIC.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL RESPONDENTS: ------------- SIYADUDHEEN, S/O.ENUDHEENKUTTY, KANDATHU VEETTIL, PONNANI NAGARAM AMSOM DESOM, PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN & T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JJ. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W.P.(C).No.27736 of 2008-B ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dated this the 19th day of September, 2008 J U D G M E N T J U D G M E N T RAMAN, J. Petitioner seeks to quash Ext.P6 order passed by the Rent Control Court, Ponnani in I.A.No.271/2008 in R.C.P.No.58/2005. The relief sought for by the petitioner before the court below is to set aside the Commission report and sketch. The court below after considering the points urged dismissed that application. The Commissioner is not yet examined in the case. We have gone through the Commission Report and Ext.P6 order. We do not find any reason to interfere with the order passed by the court below. However, the petitioner seeks for an opportunity to adduce evidence in RCP No.58/2005, if any, with regard to the Commission Report. In such circumstances, leaving open the right of the petitioner to adduce evidence before the court below at the appropriate stage or to challenge the order after culmination of the proceedings, this writ petition is dismissed. P.R.RAMAN, Judge T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, Judge ms