IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-5975 of 2011 Date of Decision:3.3.2011 Yaspal .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Karan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Rana, D.A.G. Haryana. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for directing the respondents No.1 to 3 not to harass and humiliate the petitioner at the behest of respondent No.4 and not to arrest the petitioner without giving him at least one week notice if required. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State does not dispute that as of date no FIR stands registered against the petitioner. However, it is stated that one complaint has been received at the instance of Natha Ram alleging that Rs.21,000/- has been taken by the accused on the pretext of giving the job to his son. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with a direction that in case the petitioner is required to be arrested in the above complaint filed by Natha Ram, he shall be given 3 days' advance notice. 3.3.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE