IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 899 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 87 OF 2001 MISS SARITA YADAV,VASCO DA ....Applicants GAMA,GOA. Versus STATE OF GOA THROU'THE CHIEF ....Respondents SECRETARY & 6 ORS., Mr. S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Ms.S. Naik, advocate for the applicant. Mr. S. R. Rivankar, Government Advocate for the respondent nos.1, 6,7 & 8. Mr. S. D. Padiyar, advocate for the respondent nos.2 & 3. Mr. M. S. Sonak, advocate for the respondent no.4. Coram:- R. M. LODHA & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 6th September, 2005 P.C. In this application, the following prayer has been made:- "That this Honourable Court be graciously pleased to direct the respondent no.3 to decide upon the application for regularization, allegedly made by the respondent no.5 to it, within such time as this Honourable Court may deem to specify, failing which the respondent no.3, be proceeded in contempt for deliberate non compliance of the Oral Order dated 8th March 2004 passed in Writ Petition NO.87/2001." Insofar as direction to the respondent no.3 to decide the application for regularization made by respondent no.5 is concerned, we are informed that the application has already been decided by the respondent no.3. Hence this prayer does not survive. As regards the other prayer for initiating contempt proceedings against respondent no.3, the application having been decided by the respondent no.3, we are satisfied that no action needs to be taken against respondent no.3. Miscellaneous Civil Application is accordingly disposed of. R. M. LODHA, J. N. A. BRITTO, J.