IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE FRIDAY, THE 18TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 27TH BHADRA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 752 of 2009(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.28615/2005 Dated 05/11/2005 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- C.SUBRAMANIAN, S/O.RAJAN, AGED 57 YEARS, RESIDING AT KUZHIMULLI HOUSE, CHERUVAYUR PO, VAZHAKKAD (VIA), MALAPPURAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.JIBU P THOMAS SRI.P.S.APPU SRI.A.R.NIMOD SRI.C.A.ANOOP RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. P.VIJAYAKUMAR(FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE ASSISTANT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPN, PONNANI DEPT, MALAPPURAM. 2. N.REMADEVI,(FATHER'S NAME AGE AGE NOT Known TO THE PETITIONER), SECRETARY, KERALA STATE TRANSPORT WORKERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES LTD, NO.T-133, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SHRI.JOHNSON P.JOHN, SC, KSRTC FOR R1 SRI.N.UNNIKRISHNAN FOR R2 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ------------------------------------------------------------ C.C.C. No. 752 of 2009 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of September, 2009 J U D G M E N T It is submitted on behalf of the standing counsel for the KSRTC that all the directions in Annexure-A judgment have been complied with. Counsel for respondent No.2 Sri. Unnikrishnan submits that there has been inordinate delay in the matter of compliance and on account of that delay considerable prejudice has been occasioned to the petitioner. I do notice some merit in the submission of Mr.Unnikrishnan. However, since the directions in Annexure-A have been complied with though belatedly, I do not think that this court will be justified in initiating action for contempt against the respondents. Contempt case is closed. PIUSC.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE ksv/-