IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Contempt Case (C) No.^.2-/2011 BETWEEN ^l^l1)ll •a»d.—-- 1. S.D. Rai , aged about 60 years S/o Shri Kodu Rai, presently posted as Sub Drvisional Forest Officer, South Narayanpur, R/o Jarhabhata, Near Labour Court, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (CG). 2. R.K. Rayast , aged about 51 years S/o Shri B.R. Rayast, presently posted as Sub Divisional Forest Officer, Antagarh, R/o Japra, Tahsil Charaina District Kanker (CG). 3. J.R. Rathiya , aged about 50 years S/o Shri N.R. Rathiya, presently posted as Sub Divisional Forest Officer, West Kapsi, R/o Village Maudhapali, Tahsil Kharsia, District Raigarh (CG). 4. Athanas Ekka , aged about 52 years S/o Late Shri M. Ekka, presentiy posted as Sub Divisional Forest Officer, East Bhanupratappur, R/o Madhuban Nagar, Borsi, Durg, District Durg (CG). 5. Ram Kumar Kujur, aged about 56 years S/o Shri Loya Kujur, presently posted as Sub Divisional Forest Officer, Farasgaon, North Kondagaon Forest Division. 6. Sudarshan Chandravanshi , aged about 50 years S/o Late Shri Prem Singh Chandravanslii, presently posted as Sub Divisional Forest Officer, North Kondagaon, Forest Division. 7. Ram MUan Mishra , aged about 60 yeeirs S/o Late Shri Laxman Das Mishra, presentty postNI ^s Bttb Divisional Forest Officer, East Kap^, W^^t Bhanupratappur Forest Division. g. Sudarshan Xabso , aged about 54 years S/o Shri S. Xabco, presently posted as Deputy Managing Director, District Union South Kondagaon Forest Division. 9._±©.R.L.Paikra , aged about 56 years S/o Shri Sukhiram Paikra, presently posted as Sub Divisional Forest Officer, Managing Director, District Union, North Kondagaon Forest Division. PETITIONERS AND 1. Shri Narayan Singh, Secretary, Forest Department, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. Shri Dhirendra Sharma, Principle Chief Conservator ofForest, Chhattisgarh Govemment, Raipur, (CG). RESPONDENTS CONTEMNORS CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES2l^ OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 \.^^&.. I 's^t ^i^icn^, ^r^FT^^'^r^Riy ^>^'<o ...&rJ:iM:..il.B.Zll. 'WI^? 1P?W""""""""""<"""""""""""""""W[ 200 "S^CT T^F (yii^^T) ^%^T Rl^Jcb WT v ^i ^WF ^ de ^CTW^f^T 3P|T^T SB : Hon'bie Shri Manindra Mohan 14-07-2011 Shri J.A. Lohani, counsel forti This petition has been fiied b} order dated 1/10/10 (Annexure C/1) jjtassed in VV.P.(S) No.5669/10. Learned counsel for the D€ permitted to withdraw the writ i representatlon and this Court expe(|ted that the same would be decided by the authority concerned within a furthei receipt. Learned counsei for the pe direction was not issued, the hope e> as command to take decision in the c The order dateci 1/10/10 pas the petitloners were permitted to w representatson, this Court express! petitioner wouid be decided within receipt. !t is unfortunate that the hope| the respondents have not taken ^ However, in the absence of there b^ Issue any notice. The petitioners availabie under the iaw, in case,th^ oni<il^<fli ^ITR^ff ^f 'fe1^' <f^^i< '^3tRTH3TT^T Shrivastava, J. e petitioners. the petitioneRaiieging wilifui disobeaience of titloners submits that the petitioners were letition fiied eariier, with iiberty to make period of two months from the date of its titioners submits that even though specific pressed bythe Court shouid have been taken ase ofthe petitioners. sed in W.P.(S) No.5669/10 shows that whiie thdraw the writ petition with iiberty to make sd a hope that the representation of the 2 period of two months from the date of its expressed by this Court has been beiied and ny decision in the case of the petitioners. ing any specific dlrection, i am not inciined to may take recourse to appropriate remedy / are aggrieved on account of inaction on the part of respondents. ^W^ ^-ft^ ^uil^, ^RT^TfcT—FS/l40—2/2011—1,50,000. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge -;—,