IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No. 116 of 2008 Date of decision : January 21, 2008 Shri Chand ....Appellant versus Balbir and others ....Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pritam Pal Present : Mr. Shammi Khan, Advocate for the appellant Pritam Pal,J. (Oral) This regular second appeal filed by the plaintiff is directed against judgment and decree dated 1.9.1007 passed by the learned trial court whereby a suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering in the suit property situated within the Abadi Deh of Village Bajana Kalan, District Sonepat, was dismissed. Thereafter first appeal filed by the appellant was also dismissed by the first appellate court vide judgment and decree dated 28.11.2007. Without going into further details, suffice it to say that there is no documentary or oral corroborative evidence except the bald statement of the plaintiff to prove his ownership and possession over the suit property. His statement is also discrepant and as such, the same does not inspire confidence with regard to the ownership and possession over the suit property. It is settled law that plaintiff has to stand on his own legs to prove his case. He cannot take any Regular Second Appeal No. 116 of 2008 -2- benefit or advantage of the weak evidence of the defendant. There are concurrent findings of the courts below that the plaintiff has failed to prove his ownership and possession over the suit property. Besides that, no substantial question of law is made out for consideration in this appeal by this Court. Dismissed in limine. ( Pritam Pal ) January 21, 2008 Judge 'dalbir'