IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.WP No. 12285 of 2011. [O&M] Date of Decision: 10th August, 2011. Paramjit Singh Petitioner through Mr. Amit Gupta, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents through Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 30.06.2011 [Annexure P-3] whereby he has been transferred from Faizpur to Bhagowal. Upon notice, the respondents have put in appearance. I have heard learned counsel for the parties at some length. Concededly, the petitioner is due for retirement on superannuation on 30.04.2012. Since the petitioner is left with a short duration and the impugned transfer is likely to prejudice him, the writ petition is allowed and the impugned transfer order dated 30.06.2011 [Annexure P-3] is quashed. Disposed of. Dasti. August 10, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE