IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.54844-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION:6.11.2006 Nachattar Singh ..........Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ..........Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present:- Shri APS Deol, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.S. Gill, AAG, Punjab. **** Petitioner Nachattar Singh apprehending his arrest in a non- bailable offence and who has been summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No. 132 dated 16.7.2002 under Sections 308/326/323/148/149 IPC, registered at Police Station City, Mansa, has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail. I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the FIR. Counsel for the petitioner contends that in a cross-version case, eight persons were named in the FIR, including the petitioner. During the investigation, the petitioner was found innocent and was kept in column No.2. Subsequently on the statement of the complainant, the petitioner has been summoned for the aforesaid Sections. Counsel for the petitioner further contends that in view of the order dated 14.9.2006, the petitioner has appeared before the trial Court and has furnished his regular bail bonds, which have been accepted and attested vide order dated 19.9.2006 passed by Sessions Judge, Mansa (copy of the same has been placed on record) and since then he is regularly appearing before the trial Court. In view of the above, the interim bail, granted vide order dated 14.9.2006 is made absolute. Disposed of accordingly. November 6, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) pooja JUDGE