IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 2ND JUNE 2008 / 12TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 14658 of 2008(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ P.G.SUBRAMANIAN, GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR, PUTHUSSERIKUNNEL HOUSE, EAST MARADY P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN SRI.DEEPU LAL MOHAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, KOTTAYAM. 2. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, PALA. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, VAIKKOM. 4. KANJIKUZHI BLOCK PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, S.N.PURAM P.O., CHERTHALA-688 582. 5. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No.14658 of 2008 ================== Dated this the 2nd day of June, 2008 J U D G M E N T The petitioner wanted to excavate earth for the purpose of formation of a road. He could not do it because of an order under Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code, prohibiting such action. The petitioner filed an application under Section 144(5). By Ext.P4 order the Sub Divisional Magistrate granted exemption on certain conditions. However, the Sub Divisional Magistrate reissued another order under Section 144 as a result of which the petitioner was again unable to do excavation work. The petitioner again filed Ext.P7 representation in the matter. The petitioner submits that after having passed Ext.P4 granting exemption on conditions, it is totally unjust to again impose restrictions by issuing fresh order under Section 144. 2. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that the earlier order under Section 144 was only for two months and that is why, the same was reissued. It is further submitted that the petitioner can approach the Sub Divisional w.p.c.14658/08 2 Magistrate again for exemption. The petitioner points out that the petitioner has already filed Ext.P7 exactly for the same purpose. 3. Having heard both sides, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to dispose of Ext.P7 application for exemption from the order under Section 144 in the light of Ext.P4 order passed earlier within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge