IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42621 of 2009 UPENDRA RAVIDAS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 08.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Petitioner is named accused in Punpun P.S. Case No. 40 of 2003 which was registered for the offence under section 302/34 of the Penal Code. Submission of the counsel is that there is general and omnibus allegation according to the F.I.R. Some of the accused persons have already been sent up for trial which has resulted in their acquittal. In that view of the matter the petitioner should also be given indulgence of bail. He is ready to cooperate in the trial as the allegations and accusation became doubtful. Learned counsel categorically states that if he is enlarged on bail, he shall cooperate in the trial by appearing on each and every date. It is not disputed that the case is on- going land dispute. In view of the above submission, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of IXth Additional Sessions Judge, Patna in Sessions Trial No. 680 of 2009, arising out of Punpun P.S. Case No. 40 of 2003. Both sureties will be executed by immediate close blood relation of the petitioner - 2 - on due identification by the court. The petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the trial court in person till the trial is completed. If there is any breach in the aforesaid conditions, the petitioner may lose the benefit of bail. ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J ) BTiwary/