[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.487 OF 2008 IN APPEAL NO.384 OF 2008 IN CASE NO. 992 OF 2006 Ramchandra Bandurao More ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.G.R.Nadkarni advocate for applicant Mr.Rajesh More A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : MAY 05, 2008 DATE : MAY 05, 2008 DATE : MAY 05, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant has been convicted under Section 494 of IPC and sentenced to imprisonment for two years. The applicant is now seeking bail. 3. The learned advocate for the applicant submitted that the applicant was on bail during the trial and he has not misused the liberty granted to him. The sentence imposed on the applicant is two years and the appeal preferred by the applicant is not likely to be heard within the said period, [-2-] hence, the applicant may be released on bail. These statements are not controverted by the prosecution. 4. Looking to the above facts and the evidence, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. 5. The applicant-Ramchandra Bandurao More to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. For a period of three weeks, the applicant be released on cash bail of Rs.15,000/- (Rs.fifteen thousand only). The applicant shall furnish one or two sureties to make up the said amount of Rs.15,000/- within a period of three weeks from today. If the fine amount is not paid and sureties are not furnished by the applicant within a period of three weeks from today, order granting bail to the applicant shall stand automatically cancelled and the applicant shall be taken into custody. 6. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]