IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 7192 of 2008. Decided on 02.08.2010. _________________________________________________ Roshan Lal. …Petitioner. -Versus- Secretary, H.P. State Electricity Board and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. T.C. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents. : Ms. Anjula Khajuria, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner has served a legal notice on the respondents for the redressal of his grievance on 7th June, 2000. However, no decision has been conveyed to the petitioner about the out-come of the same till date. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the legal notice dated 7th June, 2000 made by the petitioner for the redressal of his grievance and take a final decision on the same within a period of ten weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that in case the petitioner is found entitled to due seniority, the consequences shall ensue. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge August 02, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.