SJS!K! 'sv^vsi BS!SKU l'aw£"iyn ^ ^- f w IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) Vfo. SS~IS~/2006 PETITIONER ^•^^ "«^^ ^>»^<•-^ RESPONDENTS Balaram Diw'an , aged about 31 years, S/o Shri Dhirped Diwan, R/o Village A.am.gaon, Tahsil Kasdol, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh,/^" Thcou.gh Secretary, Forest Departmen.t, D.K.S. Bhawan., Raipur n 2. Union of India, through Secretary., Porest Departnient, New De.lJa.i ^s^ <^^^'-^^ 3. Forest Range Officer, Charoda.- >^<a Fi Baranwapara (Abhyaran^, ^^Th G^^,^w^ <.' Distt. Ratpur 4. Divisional forest Officery- General Forest Division, Raipur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 ^A *TTtT(^l Sh*1ich 3'E^'^lilld-M, ®Tn*f'16,Rlcliuy <tay- ^^_ ?R; 200 {^' 311^1 4dth (licll3°"i<T) 3D^rw R-)i* gsir an^T snii'n ~<:- gBiraTg^cT 3ii^r for the petitioner. e for the State/respondente No.1, 3 12.10.200e Shri Parag Kotecha, counsel Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocaj on advancecopy. Shri Raghvendra Pradhan, c^unsel for respondent No.2/ Union of India on advance copy. Arguments heard. Order dictated as follows: ORlAL ORDER SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J, By way of this writ petiti( Constitution of india, the petitione directions to the State authorities constitution and election of the with the said prayer, he has also pra schedules the date for election of thi should atso be quashed. The subject matter of this the subject matters of WP No.552 havebeen heard and dismissed bytl Learned counsel for the petit State/respondents does not dispute !n view of the above, this Wrf stage on the grounds and reasons s! in W.P. No.5524)'200S and W.P. NoJ qipiferih'iffiRrr'ifte^l'rf^Rsre ^sfRFTa.nSsr 2.10.2006) !ioh, filed under Article 226/227 of the ', has prayed for issuance of certain fp fonnulate the ruies pertaining to the mejnbere of Van Suraksha SamV. Along \/ed fhat the memo Annexure P-3, which office bearers of Van Suraksha Samiff, Wh"t Petitjon is exactly identical to that of |i/2006 and W.P. No.5525/2006, whteh tis Court vide orders dated 10.10.2006. :ibner as wel! as learned counsel for the Ijiis factual position. I Petition is ateo dismissed at fhe motion t^ted in orders dated 10.10,2006 passed $25/2006. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge oftyL?