IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 1533 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 09/02/2007 in WP NO : 8464 OF 1997 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 Sri K.Ch.V.Subbaiah S/o.Venkaiah R/o.Markapur, Prakasham District. 2 Sri.A.S.N. Reddy S/o.Laxma Reddy R/o.Markapur, Prakasham District. 3 Sri.N.Vengaiah S/o.Sreeram Reddy R/o.Markapur, Prakasham District. 4 G.Ramachandrudu S/o.Anthaiah R/o.Markapur, Prakasham District. ..... APPELLANTS AND 1 The Vice Chairman & Managing Director, A.P.S.R.T.C. Bus Bhavan, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 2 T.Narsimha Rao S/o.T.V.Narsaiah R/o.Markapur, Prakasam District. 3 G.V.Narayana S/o.Venkataswamy R/o.Markapur, Prakasam District. 4 D.Venkaiah S/o.Veeraiah R/o.Markapur, Prakasam District. (Respondent 2-4 are formal parties) Hence not necessary. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: MR.ANDAPALLI SANJEEV KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.R.MANMADHA REDDY (SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following : ORAL JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari) It is represented by the learned counsel for the appellants that the cause in the Writ Appeal does not survive and the Writ Appeal has become infrcutuous. Recording the same, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to cost. ____________________ Justice T.Meena Kumari __________________ Justice Sanjay Kumar June 2, 2009 MAS.