••~.t vi- HIOH^OJJRTOFCHHATTiSGARHJkTBU-ASPUR .t-'tl 2. Petitioners 1. Chandikeshwar Singh Sidar Aged about 55 Years, S/o. Shri Ratan Singh Sidar Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary Schoo! Gadabali Hirsingh Rathiya Aged about 45 years, Sto. Shri Pilarani Rathiya Assistant Teacher, Goyt.Primary School Domnara Colliery Janiram Rathiya Aged about 42 years, S/p. Ganga Ram Rathiya, Assistant Teaeher Primary School Khamhar, A!i are at Biock Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh Versus State ofGhhattisgarh, Through Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) The Directer Pubtic Instruction Department Raipur (C.G.) District Education OfRcer Raigarh District - Raigarh (C.G.) Block Education Officer Kharsia Dlstrict - Raigarh (C.G.) Assistant CommissiQner Tribal WeiTare Department Raigarh Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Slnate Bsnch: Hon'ble Justice Satssh K. Aanihotn Prssent : ShnAni! Mourya, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, Govt.Advocata fortha State/respodents. 1. 2. 2. 3. 4. (Passedon 2nd Juiy, 2007) The question of iaw involved fe as to whettier the petitioners are entitled to rsgular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from the dateof completion of probation period. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the respondents/State jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in W.P. (S) No.5976<20 (Sushi! Tswari and others Vs. State Government of M'r "[;!.- \ '•• 25 Chhattisgarh and others), which was allowed vide order dated 7.11.20re. . 3.3. In view ofthe above-steted submisslons made by learned counse! appearing for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms subject to verification of the facts. No order as to costs. Sd/- K.- Judge < __.._.^ ^aEBi*<»-i..»_~^^rBF-:i:itf^E £PiSfcff^UB3SwS!5Sil^tUlA<^® ^®aBBu^^!BBEa..^,^^^^S.S^^:.»Bai|,BiiffiS:^i ^iSSSW'aSS'WeWWSgl^lfSfSe