IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.9318 of 1990 (O&M) Date of Decision. 20.04.2011 Pritam Singh son of Shri Sunder Singh and others ......Appellants Versus The State of Punjab through its Secretary Local Government Department, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Sivia, Dy. Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. IPS Doabia, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Rajdeep Singh Cheema, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. There is no representation for the petitioner. On 11.1.1991, a Division Bench of this Court has observed that the above case will be taken up after the decision in C.W.P. No.5652 of 1989. The Registry has informed that the above writ petition C.W.P. No.5652 of 1989 has been disposed of on 15.11.1999. I have seen through the copy of judgment produced before me, which has resulted in dismissal of the writ petition with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the Civil Court of competent jurisdiction and writ petition cannot lie. 2. In terms of the said judgment, this writ petition is also dismissed with liberty as aforesaid. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE April 20, 2011 Pankaj*