IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (P.I.L.) No. 1111 of 2007 Smt.Shanti Danu and others …..…… Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ……… Respondents Coram:- Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Present: Mr. M.C. Kandpal, Senior Advocate with Mr. S.S. Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. H.M.Raturi, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Date of Decision: 16.03.2010 J.S. Khehar, C.J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners states, that the compliance report demonstrates the entire damaged property has been repaired. As such, it is submitted that the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 16.03.2010 P. Singh