THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA Writ petition No.1817 of 2008 Dated :.11. 02.2008 Between: Basuvoju Raja Narasaiah S/o Ramaiah .... PETITIONER And: Government of India, rep., by under Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi and others. …. RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA Writ petition No.1817 of 2008 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel. 2. On 04.02.2008 the learned Assistant Solicitor General had taken notice and requested time to get instructions. 3. The Writ petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents 1 and 2 in not releasing the Swatantra Sainik Samman Pension of the petitioner, which was sanctioned by Government of India, vide MHA sanction letter No.112/2673/84-FF (HC) 16207 dated 18.02.1994 w.e.f. 30.11.1992 as illegal, arbitrary and against principles of natural justice and for a consequential direction to the respondents to restore the pension of the petitioner with arrears and other attendant benefits. 4. Several facts had been narrated in detail. On 01.12.2007, the writ petitioner made a representation, which reads as under: “To The Principal Secretary, Government of Revenue Department, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad. Sir, Sub: Swatantra Sainik Samar Pension (SSSP). Ref: 1. MHA Sanction letter No.112/2673/84-FF (HC), Dt:18.02.1994. 2. Your Letter dated 21.06.2000 and PPO No. MHAFF 9401546. ** ** ** I wish to bring to your kind notice that the Govt. of India has suspended my pension sanctioned under SSSP based on the report by the CBCID. I beg to submit that the said case is registered as CC No.639/2002 in the court of I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Warangal. T h e Hon’ble Court has given judgment on 22.10.2007 acquitting me. A copy of the judgment is enclosed herewith for your kind perusal. Kindly in view of the dismissal of the case I request t o honourable authority to send a report to the Government of India for restoration of my pension with arrears. Thanking you Sir, Yours faithfully, Sd/- (B.RAJA NARASAIAH) H.No.(2) 11-25-985, 80 Feet Road, Kottavada, Warangal. 5. In spite of the same, it is stated that the request of the writ petitioner is not being considered. When clear acquittal had been recorded,s may be that appropriate action may have to be taken for restoration of the pension with arrears, if any. 6. In the light of the facts and circumstances, let the second respondent forward the relevant papers along with the report forthwith to the first respondent and let the first respondent take decision, in this regard, at the earliest point of time, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the report. 7. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. __________ 11.02.2008 Note: Furnish C.C. in two days. (B/o) sh