IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11450 of 2011 SANTOSH SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 21.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. It appears that in course of investigation, the name of this petitioner surfaced in this case. It is pertinent to note here that one, Dabbu Sahni claimed himself to be an eye witness of the alleged occurrence and he disclosed the name of FIR named accused persons to the informant but admittedly, the aforesaid Dabbu Sahni has not stated anything against the petitioner. The perusal of impugned order of learned Addl. Sessions Judge reveals that in course of investigation, one witness namely, Ram Naresh Kumar disclosed the name of this petitioner but the aforesaid witness has not stated the specific role which is said to have been played by the petitioner in committing the alleged crime. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, namely, Santosh Sharma be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Phulwaria P.S. Case No. 73 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)