1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JUTISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4557 OF 2009 Rabbani Chandsaheb Sayyed .... Applicant. V/s The State of Maharashtra ..... Respondent. Mr. Amin Solkar with Mr. S.M. Yakub for the applicant. Mr. Y.M. Nakhwa, APP for the State. CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. DATE : 3RD NOVEMBER, 2009 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. Applicant was arrested on 8/5/2009 for the offence punishable under sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 474 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Complainant is the second wife of the applicant. It is alleged by her that some rooms which 2 were standing in her name were sold by her husband, the present applicant, by preparing forged documents. Civil Suit also has been filed by the complainant against the present applicant. In the present case, charge-sheet has been filed and the investigation is over. 3. Taking into consideration the allegations which are made in the complaint by the complainant and also since the charge-sheet has already been filed by the prosecution, continued detention of the applicant is not necessary. Sessions Court in its order has observed that the custody of the applicant is not necessary. However, merely because telegram was sent by the complainant to the Principal Judge in which she alleged that the applicant had threatened her, his application for bail was rejected. In my view, in order to ensure that the applicant does not threaten the prosecution witness, certain conditions can be imposed on the applicant. 4. Under these circumstances, applicant be released on bail in the sum of Rs 5000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount. Applicant, however, shall report to the concerned Police Station twice in a month on 1 st and 15 th of every month. He shall not threaten any of the prosecution witnesses. 3 5. Application is disposed of. (V.M. KANADE, J.)