IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 23387 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 19.09.2011 Janak Raj ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. P.S. Jammu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Goripuria, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. ..... RAJESH BINDAL, J. While issuing of notice of motion on 16.08.2011, following contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner were noticed:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has already deposited ` 2,44,937/- per- taining to the loss caused to the Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited on account of alleged theft of en- ergy. In addition to this, he had deposited ` 1,00,000/- as compounding fee demanded from the petitioner vide the memo dated 19.2.2011.” Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the pe- titioner has already joined investigation. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Inder- jit, submitted that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. Considering the aforesaid facts, interim bail granted to the peti- tioner on 16.08.2011, is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 19.09.2011 sharmila