-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2944 OF 2008 Shrirang Namdeo Kadam ... Petitioner versus Pandurang Ramchandra Gharge and another ....Respondents Mr. Dilip Bodake for the petitioner. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR, J. DATE: JUNE 20, 2008. P.C. Considering the reasoning of the learned trial Judge, no interference is called for under Article 227 of the Constitution of India as it has been found by the learned trial Judge that none of the learned Advocates appearing for the defendants have objected the application on the ground that proposed defendants are not necessary parties to the suit and accordingly the proposed defendants were permitted to be joined as co- defendants in the suit. It cannot be said that the impugned order suffers from any illegality or the learned Judge has committed any illegality which is required to be corrected in a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence petition is dismissed. P.B. MAJMUDAR, J.