IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-21533 of 2009 (O/M). Date of Decision : August 12, 2009. Harjeet Singh. ...... Petitioner . Versus. State of Punjab. ..... Respondent . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH. Present:- Mr. Veneet Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner . AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL). Counsel for the petitioner contends that, although, the earlier application has been dismissed by this Court on merit, but still in the light of fact that the genesis of the incident if taken into consideration, the petitioner would be entitled to grant of anticipatory bail as it was a family dispute and he had only gone there to resolve the issue. It was never his intention to harm and the story has been cooked up by the complainant. These contentions of counsel for the petitioner cannot be accepted at this stage as it would be a matter of evidence, which would be led before the Trial Court. He has further submitted that at one point of time, compromise has been entered into between the parties, which compromise he has placed on record as Annexure-P-1. He on this basis also press for anticipatory bail. It is not in dispute that the injury which was attributed to the petitioner is grievous and as per allegations, he was armed with a kirpan and he has used that in the incident. By a detailed order dated 02.07.2009, this Court had on considering the merit of the case, dismissed the petition earlier. No fresh ground for anticipatory bail is made out. Dismissed. (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) JUDGE August 12,2009. sjks.