;C—78 Sf^V ?iT R;-<1<<) ^l^ Sf^f ^W 3^q' '<<i<ii<rt<<, siTfl<I'KS, fslciiyy ^nwir *^i+ "^ 200 wi?r Tniw (lyif^^tT) ^iiwttesn^i [Sinfde Beach: Hon Vs SESPORDBNTS v p,c B In th A^riculture University, Raipur, Tahsil and Di 2. Pi n Smt. Indira Tripathi Heard. By tliis petition un India, fhe petitioner respondent/Uuiversity, by| due to short attendaiice fiji The Rrievance of t| issned a notice dated 18tl ebiflTtn'^T fll^trff ^1^^ Tf^R^R ^i'aifOTsii^r tion (CLNo. 672 OF 2008 t>le Sbxi Justice Dliu-endra Mishra] fshan Kumar Patel, son of Shri Kanhaiya Lal [tel, aged about 19 years, student ofThakur [ihedilal Barrister Agriculture Coliege, laspur, Tahsil and District-BiIaspur (C.G.j iira Gandhi Agricuiture University, ~ough- its Secretary, Indira Gandhi itrict-Raipiir (C.G.) ncipal/Dean, Thakur Chhedilal Barristcr -iculture College, Bilaspur, Tahsil and itriRt -Rilasniir f'C.G.l 'ounsel for the petitioner ter Article 226 of the Coastitution of has impugned the action of which the petitioner has been detauied iin appearing in final theoiy & piactical examination for the first s^mester ia the vear 2007-08. petitioner is that respondent No.2 December 2007 (Armexure P-2) to ttie fattier of the petitioner u^fonnmg hiin that fhe attendaace of the petitioner is shoi-t, Aaotijier notice was issued to the petitioner infomimg him that for appearing in the m 75% attendance is necessai-y. !ii rei Iiimselfvide Ajinexure P-3 final examination, ininimili t.o the said notice, his l^ther reqiiested the Dean to atlow thc petitioner to appear in th^ examuiation as he could not attend the ^"•u~'^-*r !—78 3'EST "i)l<<|«<l, •a-rfl'M'lfi, fi|<A|ti^< ^Wcil sbKI* •V^ 200 311^1 W Ri-li'h 'tTaff 3TT^T ^)flf<^ s an^?r 'vsv C^fga?w) TOiiwofer sn^r -2 classes fcecause of ill-h^; letter of Annexure P-4, appearing in fhe examin^ Febmaiy 2008, After goiag fhroiigh docuiaents annexed with has been detained by fhe 75% classes necessary fij accordauce with tiie nl Moreover, the petitioner right for seekiag direclpon examiaation even withoutl In fhe result, thep^titi' be disinissed and is accoi|din staee itselE •»i'(In«fliiiint 'if.1s(st <.Ri|^i< ^3iRlH3TI^T jaith. However withoiit considering tlie |the petitioner has been detamed from Ition, which is going to be held froin 2nd the averments in the petition aad other fhe petition, it appeara that the petitioaer fJniyersity as he did not attend muiimuin ^r appearm.g m the final examination in jles aad regulation of the Univeraity. t-oiild not be able to point oiit any legal for permission to appear ia the lattending 75% classes. has no force, the saaae deserves to pingly hereby dismissed at fhe admission Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge p^titioa Bs • ^ -^-