IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 144 OF 2008 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 144 OF 2008 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 144 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 183 OF 2008 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 134 OF 2008 IN L.C. SUIT NO. 129 OF 2008 Kirit Shah ... Appellant (Org.Plaintiff) Vs. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. ... Respondent (Org.Defendant) Mr. K.P.Ravi, Advocate, for the appellant Mrs. Geeta Joglekar, Advocate, for the respondent CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 21st February,2008. DATE: 21st February,2008. DATE: 21st February,2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The Appeal is preferred against the refusal of ad-interim injunction while the Notice of Motion is still pending. Admittedly, the respondent has not yet filed any reply to the Notice of Motion. 3. The learned Counsel for the respondent makes a statement that the respondent shall file a reply to the Notice of Motion within two weeks and shall not act upon the impugned notice till disposal of the Notice of Motion. The statement is accepted. In view of this, the Appeal stands disposed of with the following directions :- (i) The respondent shall submit a reply to the Notice of Motion within two weeks and the trial Court shall hear and dispose of the Notice of Motion within four weeks thereafter. (ii) The plaintiff-appellant shall also implead the landlord as defendant in the said suit by making amendment within two weeks. 4. The learned Counsel for the respondent makes a statement that the Corporation will give consent to the Chamber Summons which maybe filed by the appellant-plaintiff for impleading landlord as defendant to the suit. 5. In view of the disposal of the Appeal, the C.A. does not survive and stands disposed of. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)