THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY WP No.25315 OF 2007 30-1-2008 BETWEEN: Sri Y. Bal Raju, S/o. Y. Mallaiah, aged 43 years, Occ: Business, R/o.Gandhinagar, Bakaram, Hyderabad & Others … Petitioners & The Special Court under AP Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act 1982 at Hyderabad & Others ….. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY WP No.25315 OF 2007 ORDER:: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed, J) This Writ Petition is filed seeking a writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in partly allowing the interlocutory application being IA No.818 of 2007 in LGC No.6 of 2004 by order 5-11-2007 as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 1st respondent to receive the documents on behalf of the petitioners by allowing the said IA. 2. Heard the learned counsel on both sides. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the 1st respondent-Special Court without considering the relevancy or otherwise of the certified copies of certified copies, ought not to have refused to mark them that too on the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the party- respondents that some of the certified copies of certified copies cannot be marked. 3. We have perused the impugned order dated 5-11-2007, which reads as under: “The above petition is filed under Order 8, Rule 1 CPC on behalf of the petitioners (R-1 to 3) along with the documents. Heard both sides. Respondents counsel submitted that there are some certified copies of certified copies which cannot be marked. Mark other documents subject to proof, relevancy and admissibility. Petition accordingly allowed.” 4. Inasmuch as the impugned order is a non-speaking order and does not deal with what are those some certified copies of certified copies and their relevancy or otherwise, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded to the 1st respondent-Special Court for considering the matter afresh. Appropriate orders thereon be passed in accordance with law and after hearing the counsel on both sides. 5. In the result, the writ petition is allowed. No order as to costs. ______________________ Ghulam Mohammed, J _______________________ B. Seshasayana Reddy, J Dated : 30th January, 2008 Note: cc in 3 days. (b/o) Nrg