WP(C) 1956/2008 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE H N SARMA Heard Mr PK Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr MR Das, learned counsel for BSNL and Ms K Deka, learned counsel for the respondent No 6. The grievance as projected in this writ petition by the petitioner is ag ainst an order dated 8.5.2008 passed by the Assistant Engineer (Bldg), BSNL, all otting Type-II/BI-III quarter No 12 at wireless compound at Dispur and to shift from the quarter No Ty-II/22 at LS Road, Panbazar. The petitioner has also chall enged the order dated 17.5.2008 by which the prayer of the petitioner for cancel lation of the aforesaid order was rejected by the Sub-Divisional Engineer (Bldg) , BSNL. The petitioner has been serving as driver in the BSNL. Due to exigency o f service he was allotted with the departmental quarter No Ty-II/22 at LS road, Panbazar, Guwahati. There was an incident between the petitioner and the respond ent No 6 on 1.3.2006 and the General Manager, BSNL, Kamrup, vide order dated 24. 3.2008 closed the said issue by giving an warning to the petitioner advising hi m to beg unconditional apology to the respondent No 6. The petitioner alleged th at thereafter demands from All Mohila Samity Parishad was made to the General Ma nager, BSNL by letter dated 25.4.2008 and also by the Branch Secretary of the B SNLEU dated 25.4.2008 against the petitioner wherein it is alleged that petition er has threatened the respondent No 6 with dire consequence. It is contended tha t the impugned order dated 8.5.2008 was issued as sequel to the aforesaid pressu re put on the authorities by the agencies which have no occasion in the matter a nd accordingly, submits that the impugned order has been passed on extraneous co nsideration. A counter has been filed on behalf of the respondent Nos 1 and 2. A sepa rate counter stated to have filed on behalf of the respondent No 6. Opposing the writ petition, Mr Das submits that even after the aforesaid incident with a view to maintain cordial relationship amongst the employees and the allegations made by the BSNL Employees Union, the petitioner was shifted to his newly allotted quarter at Wireless compound, Dispur. From the materials available on records including the pleadings of the p arties it is found that there are bitter relationship between the petitioner and the respondent No 6. the authorities on such ground to maintain discipline amon gst the employees passed the impugned order shifting the petitioner from the qua rter at Panbazar to Dispur by the impugned order and there is no violation of se rvice condition of the petitioner. The quarter in question is also of the same t ype and quality. In the facts and circumstances of the case, steps taken by the authorities for maintaining cordial relationship, peace and harmony amongst the BSNL employees, the stand taken by the department cannot be said to be unfair, u njust and improper. It is purely an administrative order hardly permitting any j udicial review. In that view of the matter, I do not find any merit in this writ petition and hence stands dismissed