: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION WRIT PETITION WRIT PETITION NO.8182 OF 2004 NO.8182 OF 2004 NO.8182 OF 2004 Jagannath Sawala Dudhal ).. Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and another ).. Respondents Mr.Milind Deshmukh for the Petitioner. Mr.C.R.Sonawane, A.G.P., for the Respondents. CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR AND CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR AND CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR AND SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DATED: 13TH JANUARY 2005 DATED: 13TH JANUARY 2005 DATED: 13TH JANUARY 2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . By this Petition, the Petitioner has impugned the order passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal rejecting the claim of the Petitioner for grant of pension. 2. The finding of the Tribunal is well recorded in paragraph 15 which reads as under : "15. Admittedly the applicants have failed to produce any authentic evidence to the effect that they are eligible for pension as their husband/they held permanent post or service for 10 years in Ex-Princely State. Therefore, there is no infirmity either in the G.R. dated 10.1.1996 or the letters of rejection for : 2 : grant of pension to the applicants." 3. In such circumstances, application was dismissed for total lack of evidence. No jurisdictional error is committed by the Tribunal in so doing. Hence, Petition dismissed.