- 1 - D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (w) NO. 331/05 Jagdish Prasad vs. State of Raj. DATE OF ORDER : 23/5/2007 HON'BLE SHRI RAJESH BALIA, J. HON'BLE SHRI BHANWAROO KHAN, J. Mr.Ranjeet Joshi, for the appellant. Mr.Bheem Arora, for the respondent. This appeal arises out of the writ petition filed third time seeking mandamus that the respondent may appropriately comply with the directions to decide the representation of the appellant-petitioner by a speaking order in connection with regularization of his possession over the plot in question. While admitting the appeal on 12/4/2007, a detailed order was passed directing the respondents to make compliance of the order and decide the representation which was pending before them within one month and the appeal was directed to be listed after one month. It is now common ground that representation filed by the appellant in pursuance of directions issued in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2664/92 decided on 8/7/94 has been finally decided and decision of the authority concerned has been placed on record. - 2 - Learned counsel for the appellant wants to challenge the findings recorded in the decision deciding his representation. Apparently, that being a fresh cause of action, the petitioner is free to pursue his remedies independent of this appeal. The purpose of present petition out of which this appeal has arisen has been served and it has now become infructuous. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed subject to appellant's right to pursue his remedies against the order passed by the authority concerned on his representation. (BHANWAROO KHAN), J. (RAJESH BALIA), J. Pankaj Baweja.