IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.928 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.197 OF 2007 Mrs. Geeta Hiroo Chainani Nee Ms Dhun Kekobad Mistry ..Plaintiff Vs. Mr. Dadi S. Mistry & ors. ..Defendants And Mr. Khushed Nariman Patel & Anr. ..Respondents Mr. Mody i/b S. Pathak & Co. for the Plaintiff Ms. Manju Sharma i/b Amol Doijode for Defendant Nos.1 & 2 Mr. Piyush Raheja i/b Federal & Rashmikant for Defendant Nos.3 to 6 CORAM: A.P. BHANGALE, J. DATE : 3rd MAY, 2010 P.C. Heard. The plaintiff is proposed to amend the plaint as proposed in the schedule annexed to the chamber summons. The learned counsel appearing for the defendants have no objection. The chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). None appeared for the respondents although they have served. The amendment to be carried out within 8 weeks. (A.P. BHANGALE, J.)