IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 26TH JUNE 2008 / 5TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 19310 of 2008(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ VIJAYAN, AGED 53, S/O. SWAYA RAJAN, VALLIPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHANDRAPINNI VILLAGE, THRISSUR DT. BY ADV. SRIT.A.SHAIN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR. 2. UNNIKRISHNAN, S/O. GOVINDANKUTTY, PERIMPADAPPIL HOUSE, EDATHURUTHY VILLAGE. BY GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No.19310 of 2008 ================== Dated this the 26th day of June, 2008 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved by non-consideration of Ext.P4 representation filed by the petitioner before the 1st respondent in the matter of cutting of two coconut trees standing dangerously over the petitioner's property and building as is evidenced by Ext.P5 photograph. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. In the nature of the order I propose to pass, I do not think it necessary to issue notice to the 2nd respondent, who is the owner of the property on which the subject coconut trees are standing. 3. From a perusal of Ext.P5 photograph I am satisfied that urgent action is necessary at the hands of the 1st respondent in respect of the subject matter. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent to pass orders on Ext.P4 representation as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of w.p.c.19310/08 2 being heard to the petitioner and the 2nd respondent. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition along with a certified copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge