IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.6033 of 2005 Between: Md. Aitheeshamuddin Omer, S/o. Late Md. Saaduddin, R/o. Plot No. 8-C, Street No. 10, Hyderashah Court, Sun City, R.R. District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Sub Inspector of Police, Uppal Police Station, Ranga Reddy District. 3 Mohd. Gaffar, S/o. Late Shaik Mahboob, R/o. 18-11-67/A/45/G/35/1, Sallalla, Near Barkas, Hyderabad. 4 Mr. Ashok, Major, Posted at Uppal Police Station, Ranga Reddy District. 5 Mr. Ravinder Reddy, Major, Posted at Uppal Police Station, Ranga Reddy District. 6 Md. Sadiq, S/o. Late Md. Abid, Major, R/o. 3-1-113, Ramanthapur, Ranga Reddy District. 7 Md. Thoufeeq, S/o. Late Md. Abid, Major, R/o. 3-1-113, Ramanthapur, Ranga Reddy District. 8 Md. Shafeeq, S/o. Late Md. Abid, Major, R/o. 3-1-113, Ramanthapur, Ranga Reddy District. 9 Md. Rafeeq, S/o. Late Md. Abid, Major, R/o. 3-1-113, Ramanthapur, Ranga Reddy District. 10 Md. Sayeed, S/o. Late Md. Abid, Major, R/o. 3-1-113, Ramanthapur, Ranga Reddy District. 11 Md. Khaleel, S/o. Late Md. Abid, Major, R/o. 3-1-113, Ramanthapur, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to pass a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 4 to 11 in dispossessing the petitioner from the lawful possession of his premises and interfering with the civil rights of the petitioner and depriving the petitioner of his livelihood and further declare the action of respondents 1 and 2 in not taking any action on the complaint given by the petitioner agaisnt respondents 4 to 11 as illegal, without jurisdiction and violative of Article 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and further be pleased to pass such other orders as deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.THIRUMALA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RLD} THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.6033 of 2005 O R D E R: The petitioner seeks to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the unofficial respondents 3 to 11 from dispossessing him from the lawful possession of the premises and interfering with his civil rights and further declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in not taking any action against the unofficial respondents, as illegal and arbitrary. In so far as the relief claimed against the unofficial respondents 3 to 11 cannot be issued, as civil disputes have to be resolved before the Civil Court. In so far as the State is concerned, respondents 1 and 2 cannot interfere with the civil disputes without following due process of law, unless a report is filed showing cognizable offence and a crime has been registered. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondents 1 and 2 not to interfere with the civil disputes among the petitioner and the unofficial respondents 3 to 11, and in so far as the complaint said to have been filed by the petitioner and no action has been taken by the official respondents 1 and 2, it is open for the petitioner to file a private complaint in that regard. No order as to costs. ___________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 30.04.2008 Dsr ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Superintendent of Police, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Sub Inspector of Police, Uppal Police Station, Ranga Reddy District. 3.2CCs to 4.2CD copies