IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26745 of 2009 1. BHAGO MAHTO 2. JUGAL MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.08.2009 Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioners have approached this Court seeking bail in a case instituted under diverse sections of the Penal Code including section 307 IPC, section 3/5 of the Explosive Substance Act and section 27 of the Arms Act. On account of uprooting of the crops, a dispute arose between the parties. It is alleged that petitioner no.1 along with others fired causing injury to none. So far as petitioner no.2 is concerned, allegation is that he hurled a bomb, but again no injury was caused. Records indicate that petitioners evaded arrest for a few years. They are in custody since 25.10.2008 and 17.11.2008 respectively. Looking to the allegations and the facts appearing from the records, this Court is persuaded to admit them to bail. Let the petitioners abovenamed be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- each, with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J. III, Barh in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 35/01 (Sessions Trial No.420/09), subject to the condition that one of the bailors of each of the petitioners shall be his 2 own/close family member and that no sooner the charges are framed in the case, the petitioners shall appear on each date fixed in trial. In case of default on two consecutive dates, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel their bail bonds and secure their arrest in accordance with law. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )