1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1635 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.424 OF 2005 Bhartiya Suraksha Rakshak & General Kamgar Union. ...Petitioner. Vs. The Security Guards Board & Ors. ...Respondents. And Santosh B. Bhome. ....Applicant. .... CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1636 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.424 OF 2005 Bhartiya Suraksha Rakshak & General Kamgar Union. ...Petitioner. Vs. The Security Guards Board & Ors. ...Respondents. And Ajit Pandurang Bhunde. ....Applicant. .... CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1637 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.424 OF 2005 Bhartiya Suraksha Rakshak & General Kamgar Union. ...Petitioner. Vs. The Security Guards Board & Ors. ...Respondents. And Rajesh Nandkumar Katiyar. ....Applicant. .... CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1638 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.424 OF 2005 Bhartiya Suraksha Rakshak & General 2 Kamgar Union. ...Petitioner. Vs. The Security Guards Board & Ors. ...Respondents. And Maniram S. Darai. ....Applicant. .... CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1639 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.424 OF 2005 Bhartiya Suraksha Rakshak & General Kamgar Union. ...Petitioner. Vs. The Security Guards Board & Ors. ...Respondents. And Shrihari P.Jagnade. ....Applicant. .... CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1640 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.424 OF 2005 Bhartiya Suraksha Rakshak & General Kamgar Union. ...Petitioner. Vs. The Security Guards Board & Ors. ...Respondents. And Ganesh Sitaram Jadhav. ....Applicant. .... CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1641 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.424 OF 2005 Bhartiya Suraksha Rakshak & General Kamgar Union. ...Petitioner. Vs. The Security Guards Board & Ors. ...Respondents. And Sanjay Keshav Dhumal. ....Applicant. .... Mr. I.S. Thakur for the Applicants. Mrs.L. V. Lund i/b. Ms.Lata Desai for Respondent No.1. 3 Mr.K. S. Bapat for Respondent No.3. ..... CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, J. AND DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. January 20, 2006. P.C. These are applications by the applicants for being added as directed pursuant to the order of this Court dated 13th June 2005. Considering that, all applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The Petitioner to carry out amendment within one week from today. It will be open to the newly added Petitioners, if they are so advised, to take out appropriate application for interim relief, if any, which they are entitled to. With the above observation, the applications disposed of. ( F.I. Rebello, J.) (Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)