CWP(T) No.73 of 2008 27.7.2009 Present: Sh.A.K.Gupta, counsel, for the petitioner. Sh.R.K.Bawa, Advocate General with Sh.R.M.Bisht, Dy.Advocate General, for the respondents. It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner’s case is now covered by the judgment of this Court, dated June 17, 2008, passed in CWP No.319 of 1997, titled Hira Lal versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another, and that petitioner’s pay is to be re-fixed in accordance with the said judgment. He has drawn our attention to a letter dated 4th February, 2009, at page 6 of the file, per which Law Department has given the opinion that all the teachers, similarly situated and circumstanced as Hira Lal in CWP No.319 of 1997, are to be given the benefit of pay. He submits that in view of the aforesaid development, petitioner would be making representation to the Director of Education (Elementary), respondent No.2, for fixation of his pay afresh. In view of the above submission, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Petitioner may, if aggrieved by the order that may be passed on his representation, which he proposes to make to respondent No.2, for fixation of his pay, in accordance with the aforesaid decision dated 17th June, 2008, file a fresh writ petition in this Court. Copy Dasti. (Deepak Gupta), Judge July 27, 2009(m) (Surinder Singh) Judge