RSA No. 1090 of 2006 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 1090 of 2006 Date of Decision: 5.2.2007 State of Haryana and others ...Appellants Versus B.R. Singla ....Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta. Present: Shri Madan Gupta, Sr. DAG, Haryana, for the appellants. Shri Gunjan Mehta, Advocate, for the respondent. HEMANT GUPTA, J. The defendants are in second appeal aggrieved against the judgment and decree passed by the Courts below, whereby suit for declaration filed by the plaintiff to the effect that he is entitled to get his salary fixed at Rs.11,850/- with effect from 1.1.1998 and regular increments was decreed. The challenge was to the fixation of the basic pay of the plaintiff at Rs.11,025/- with effect from 1.1.1998. It has been found by both the Courts below that the plaintiff was promoted as SDO on 15.7.1994 and his basic pay was fixed at Rs.3700/- vide order dated 24.08.1994 (Exhibit P.1). He was not granted any annual increments and his pay was fixed at Rs.11,025/-, though on the basis of basic pay of Rs.3000/-, the pay should have been Rs. 11,850/-. RSA No. 1090 of 2006 (2) The said finding returned by the Courts below cannot be said to be suffering from any patent illegality or irregularity, which may raise any substantial question of law in the present appeal. Hence, the present appeal is dismissed. 05-02-2007 (HEMANT GUPTA) ds JUDGE