IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38518 of 2010 1. MD.JAHIRUL @ JAHRUL SON OF AJIMUDDIN 2. MOSMAT HAJMUN @ HAJMUN NEGA WIFE OF LATE AJIMUDDIN BOTH R/O BAULAN, P.S.- RAUTA, DISTRICT- PURNEA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 13/04/2011 Heard Mr. Binay Kumar Bineet, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant. Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioners was rejected vide order dated 22.1.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 41223 of 2009 with observation that they may renew their prayer for bail after examination of the witness who has been examined in paragraph 69 of the case diary. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that now that witness namely, Aneti whose statement was recorded under section 161 Cr.P.C. in paragraph 69 of the case diary has been examined as PW 4 in Sessions Trial No. 129 of 2010. Prayer for bail of the petitioners was opposed by the learned counsel for the informant. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and earlier observation, the petitioners above named are directed to be released on furnishing of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties 2 of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M./concerned Court, Purnea in connection with Rauta P.S. Case No. 26 of 2009. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) avin