HreHCOURT OF CHHATTISOARH, BILASPUR -X (? PETJTIONER RESPONDENTS W.P.(SlNo. 4300 of 2007 M.L. Dewangan, aged about 60 yeare (Running), S/o. late Shri Maiik Ram, Assistant Engineer Kelo Project Servey, Sub-Division No. 2 Raigarh, R/o. Sub- Division Officer, Kelo Project, Servey, Sub-DMsion No.2 Raigarh (C.G.) Versus 1 State of Chhattisgarh, Through- Chief Secretar^, Water Resources Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, P.0. & Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2 Chief Engineer, Hasdeo Bango Project, Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 Executive Engineer, Kelo Project, Servey, Division Raigarh (C.G.) 4 U.S. Darshan, aged about 45 years, S/o. unknown, Sub-Division Officer, Water Resources Department, Sub-Division, Raigarh (C.G.) Appearance: Shri Hanuman Prasad Agrawa!, counsel for the petitioner. Shri A.S. Kachhawaha, Govt. Advocate for the State on advance copy. ORAL ORDER (25.7.2007} SUNU.KUMARSINHA.J, Heard flnally with the consent of both the pariies. The petitioner, who is an Asstt. Engineer in the Water Resources ©epartment,has challenged the valklity of transfer order dated 6.7.2007 (Annexure-P/1), whereby, he has been transferred from Raigarh to Bitaspur. Refemng to the contents of Annexure-P/2, tearned counsel for the petitioner argues that the date of birth of the petitioner is 08.12.1947, according to which, the petitioner is to be superannuated in the month of December, 2007 and he would be facing much hardship, if he is transferred from Raigarh to Bilaspur just about 6 months prior to the date of superannuation. He also referred to clause No. 7 of the policy dated 13th June, 2007, according to which. the case of the persons, who are at the verge of retirement are to be considered under the said clause. H® ,"TW-f-*^fflt"-.W!tau« - '^.^ vatti W.P.<S) No. 4300 of2007 '>-. submits that the aforesaid order is also in violation of the said policy of the Government. After hearing the iearned counsei fbr the petitioner and the State and after going through the contents of the petition as well as document Annexures-P/1, P/2 and the contents of the policy vide clause 7, in the opinion of ftis Court, the ends ofjustice would be served, if the petitioner is directed to file a representation before the concemed auttiority invoking the provisions of clause 7 ofthe policyframed in Annexure-P/3. Accordingty, this petition is disposed of with a direction that the peUtioner shall filed a detailed representation before the concemed authority within a period of 3 weete from today along with copy of this order and the copy of writ petition, raising his grtovance, and if such a representation is filed, the concemed authority sha!) dispos®of the same as early as possible preferably withi" a period of 2 months from the date of receipt of the said representation. !t is further directed that in the meanwhite, the petitioner shall not be relieved from his present place of posting (Raigarh) and shall be altowed to continue there. The petition stands finally disposed of. ^^ S-inha