IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.159 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5556 OF 2007 Shyam Gulabrao Kale and others ... Appellants Versus The Commissioner, Nashik Municipal Corporation ... Respondent Mr. M.S. Topkar for the appellants. Mr. M.L. Patil for the respondent. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 21ST JULY, 2009 P.C. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellants. Challenge is to the order dated 3rd/4th March, 2008 passed by the learned Single Judge vide which the court accepted the writ petition and set aside the orders passed in both the complaints. The principal reason recorded by the court was that the appointment to the post of Junior Clerk is governed by Service Rules framed under section 465 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 and the Industrial Court committed a gross error in holding that the petitioners were guilty of engaging in acts of unfair labour practice. It is not disputed before us that the appointment to the post of Junior Clerk is controlled by Service Rules under the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949. The Corporation having acted in accordance with the rules, we do not see any reason to interfere. Dismissed. No order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.