^ SlNi.sLt F^^^^ CL6;1 \^^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(^No. 3,^J^ /2009 PETITIONER : Narendra Toppo, S/o Shri Laxaman Ram, Aged abput 40 years, Upper ^ Division Teacher, Middle School Pasta, ^^^•^...••Balrampur,Distt. - Surguja (C.G.) ^0^^%^.-' R/o. Village - Parhi, P.S. & Tahsil - ..••''^\y Balrampur, Distt.- Surguja (C.G.) ...••••;'^y .^:x^"' ^•^ 'o" ^ VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, Schedule Caste/Schedule Tribes Development Department, Mantrayalay, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) 2. Collector (Tribal Development) Surguja, Ambikpur (C.G.) ^MM^ ^ ~ S'^} T\'^ ^. ^fa^ '% [^TA^t 3. Commissioner, Schedule Caste/Schedule Tribes DevelopmentDeptt, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTXTUTION OF INDIA •—78 (^^ ^" •<RT^1' ^I 'fe5iNT ^^T ^?1^T ^T^NF %- "g^ET •??n?n^?, i$Tf^*r^, fayri^y MIM^I**>i*-^-fi'^zslst<---^200^ ^TT^T ^sR' ( ^yn^f) ¥WW^N^?i^? SB:' Hon. !V(r. Justice R Shri Bhupendra SJngh co Shri Yashwant Singh T^akur Dy. AG with Shri Shashank Thakur PL forthe respon| Chalienge in thls petitid passed by respondent No.2 by as Upper Division Teacher, Mid has been transferred to the of11 on admlnistrative ground. Contention of the coun] present place of posting the pe| Impugned. He further submits tS ^Ri^^i ^weff ^ fe^ ^l^f^K ^^ftpRf^?r jnsei for the petitioner. [lents/State. h is to the order dated 30.6.2009 whlch the petitloner who is working idie Schooi, Pasta, Block Balrampur, ice Biock Education Officer, Menpat, sei for the petitioner is that in the iitioner had joined on 14.10.2008 and wtthin a period of 09 months h'4 has again been shlfted by the order lat nobody has been posted in pSace ofthe petltioner which shows t^at there Is no adminlstratjve exigency In passing the impugned order ^ftransfer. Counsei for the respqndents/State submits that let the petitioner make a suitable \ representation to the authorities concerned which would be decided in accordance with law. To thls proposition of the State counsel, counsel for the petitioner showed his agreement. However, he prays for an interim protectlon tili the i representation of the petltioher is decided by the authorities concerned. i i^W,,^:^ ^^..y^^i.^.A.^ -r^^ ^ -^^ •:^ ^,^^ ^^^&^ F.HC—78 ^n^l '^Tfe't^ ^^ ^T^ ^TOSFT ^ '-^) "S^i '•^WW^,W^W^, 1^RTR:?y -s.— TINCTI «>*ffe?» •^T200 W^T ^^ (^"l^^F) '^H^R ^rf^f 2^?| Accordingly, the peti'tion| the petitioner makes a repres| withln a period of 10 days order, the authoritiss concerrled further period ofthree weeks order Impugned shaii be kept petltioner. froh frbm ^p-rf^riN 'HTR^ff ^* ft^f TfW$K ^^RROT^T |is disposed ofwlth a direction that jf fentation to the authorities concemed the date of recelpt of copy of thls shaii declde the same within a the date of its recelpt. Tli! then the i|i abeyance so far as it reiates to the Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge ?, /. t^r-v.,^-.:^ -fSSy^.^^,-:^-:^^ l y:i