... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1200 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1200 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1200 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1141 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1141 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1141 OF 2006 Sikandar R. Jhazote ...Applicant Versus The State ...Respondent Shri Jeevan D. Sawant for the Applicant. Shri S.V.More, A.P.P for the Respondent. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : DECEMBER 12, 2006. DATE : DECEMBER 12, 2006. DATE : DECEMBER 12, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned A.P.P for the State. The conviction of the Applicant is for offence punishable under section 3 read with section 25 of the Arms Act. The substantive sentence is rigorous imprisonment for one year. Fine amount is deposited by the Applicant. The Applicant was on bail throughout the trial. Hence, Application is disposed of by passing the following order: (i) The Applicant shall be enlarged on the same bail on which he was enlarged during the pendency of the trial subject to filing fresh ... 2 ... bail bonds. (ii) Bail is granted subject to condition that the Applicant will report to Ghatkopar Police Station, Mumbai once in every calendar month till the disposal of the Appeal. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE