19.cr appa 1059­09.doc RMA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1059 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 878 OF 2009 Dashrath Pitambar Saroj .. Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. R.D. Suryawanshi for the Applicant Ms. M.M. Deshmukh, APP for the State CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J DATE : 14th SEPTEMBER,2010. P.C.: 1. Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant-original accused no. 1 has been convicted under Section 397 read with 34 of IPC. The appeal preferred by the applicant against the said order is pending. Now, the applicant is seeking bail. 3. Learned advocate for the applicant stated that besides this case, the applicant has a clean record. Learned APP on instructions corroborates this fact. 4. Learned advocate for the applicant submitted that the maximum sentence imposed on the applicant is 7 years and as of today, the applicant has undergone more than half 1 19.cr appa 1059­09.doc the period of imprisonment, hence the applicant be released on bail. Thus, looking to the above facts, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. Hence, the order: O R D E R 1. Applicant Dashrath Pitambar Saroj be released on bail in the sum of Rs. 30,000/- [Rs. Thirty Thousand Only] with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The Applicant shall report to the Central Police Station, Ulhasnagar-3 once in a week till disposal of the appeal. 2. Application is allowed in above terms. [SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] 2 19.cr appa 1059­09.doc 3