IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 7TH APRIL 2008 / 18TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 11649 of 2008(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- THEKKETH USMAN, S/O. ABDURAHIMAN, NEAR MUNICIPAL TOWN HALL, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.A.MOHAMED MUSTAQUE SRI.KAUSER EDAPPAGATH RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE SUB COLLECTOR, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. THE SECRETARY, PERINTHALMANNA MUNICIPALITY, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERINTHALMANNA POLICE STATION, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD SRI.P.K.VIJAYAMOHANAN, SC FOR R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 11649 OF 2008 J ==================== Dated this the 7th day of April, 2008 J U D G M E N T The complaint in this writ petition is regarding the alleged illegal stoppage of the buses at unauthorised places. Petitioner is seen to have made Ext.P4 complaint to the 4th respondent and in this writ petition what is alleged is that that the 4th respondent is not taking action on the complaint. 2. If as a matter of fact, Ext.P4 has been received by the 4th respondent, the 4th respondent shall necessarily take action on the complaint made by the petitioner. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 4th respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp