IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.2592 of 2011 Dinesh Bhagat Vs. Union of India, new Delhi & others Present: Mr.Balram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has filed this writ petition only on the basis of his apprehension by averring that bank officials have come to say that they will put lock on his shop. This is a mere apprehension as no action has been taken so far. The petitioner has not been even served notice under Section 13(4) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. In my considered opinion, the present writ petition, at this stage, is totally premature. Dismissed accordingly. February 11, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE