IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.19371 of 2010 Omender Sharma Vs. State of Haryana & others Present: Mr.Yogesh Kumar, Advocate, for Mr.Sunil Sahore, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The counselling fees deposited by the petitioner has been admittedly sent to a wrong Institution. The petitioner has represented for transferring the fees to the College where he has been admitted. Grievance is that nothing is being done in this regard. More appropriately, the petitioner's representation should have been attended to and if not, the petitioner could have made an approach to the higher authorities of the Director also. Normally, such like matters are not worth invoking writ jurisdiction. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner and decide the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order. October 28, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE