IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 2ND JUNE 2008 / 12TH JYAISHTA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 752 of 2008(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.36467/2007 Dated 10/12/2007 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WP(C): ------------------------------------------------ CHANDRAN, S/O. RAGHAVAN, OTTAPLACKIL HOUSE, PULIYANOORKARA, MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.PHILIP T.VARGHESE SRI.THOMAS T.VARGHESE RESPONDENTS: 1ST RESPONDENT IN WP(C): ------------------------------------- SUMATHY KUNJAMMA FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), KOTTAYAM-686002. BY SR.GOVT.PLEADER SMT.ANU SIVARAMAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- Cont. Case (C).No.752 OF 2008 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of June, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner, a member of a co-operative society, filed the writ petition contending that he is entitled to be heard in relation to a matter pending before a statutory authority. This Court issued the judgment stating that he may also be heard if he is entitled to be heard. His present complaint is that the officer who was to conduct the hearing passed a pre-dated order, showing it to have been issued even before the judgment was passed. Accordingly, the petitioner make out a case that there is a concerted effort to violate the terms of the judgment. I am not impressed. I find no reason why there could be any such inference as against the making of the order. Hence, leaving open all questions relatable to the right, if any, of the petitioner to challenge such decision of the statutory authority, this writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge kkb.