IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3186 of 2008 BISHESHWAR BAITHA Son of Gugar Baitha, resident of Mohalla Sikandarpur, Police Station-Mojahidpur, District-Bhagalpur ----------------- Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------------ Opp.Party ----------- 2 20-01-2009 Heard Mr.Prabhakar Jha, the learned counsel for the petitioner as also Dr. Mayanand Jha, the learned A.P.P. for the State. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after he had deposited the entire amount due to the Board in view of Section 152 of the Electricity Act, 2003, the case has now been referred to the Lok Adalat. It appears that the petitioner is seeking two remedies at the same time, namely, his original case is before the Lok Adalat and simultaneously he has also preferred this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C.. Perusing two remedies at the same time is neither warranted in law nor permissible. In that view of the matter, this application in view of pendency of the case in the Lok Adalat is dismissed. ( Abhijit Sinha, J ) NKS/-