•; f:: ii "''•'- i^liva..?: ("*' d C-3-- /sr^2 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION (Cl_No. ^j OF 2010 ^5 'p<®ssv' ^ PETITIONER ?^a. ^,\..^fc.^- ^:p^:-"" ^3^^' RESPONDENTS •!££?a*:!at. 4<?a.I3^ .[S': as-.^'" ff-, ^..!s'/ e< -;ad'"3,^';J3. ^p ssy '<'i %.' Roseline Bachmann D/o. Edwin Bachmann, aged about 40 years, Ex- Member of Legislative Asserably, R/o. Adarsh Nagar, Kunkuri, Tahsil and District Jashpur (C.G.), VERSUS A) State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Department of Revenue Administration, D.K.S. Bhawan Mantralya Raipur (C.G.), ^2) The Collector, The Collectorate, Jashpur Nagar, District Jashpur (C.G.), ^3) The Station House Officer, Thana Kunkuri, District Jashpur (C.G.), ^4) Sanskritik Samittee, Adarsh Nagar, Kunkuri, Through President, Shri Mitra Bhan Yadav, Son of not known to the petitioner, aged about 55 years, Occupation Assistant Grade-III, Bagicha Block, Forest Range, Kunkuri, District Jashpur (C.G.), 1 .T. K.^'SE?SSSi ^ss^!e"~~ ^5). Dh^rmjagran Samanvay Saniittee, Through State President Surendra Ji, Son of not known to the petitioner, aged about 48 years, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.), /6). Dharin Sena District Head, Santosh Sahay, Son of not known to the petitioner, Jashpur Nagar, District Jashpur (C.G.), /7). Dharra Jagran Block Level President, Shri Vishnu Gupta, Son of not known to the petitioner, Kunkuri, District Jashpur (C.G.). y 8). Smt. Devki Bai wife of Late Rewa Singh, R/o. Kunkuru, District Jashpur (C.G.), WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE226/ 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 's'5,, 'i 1 ^/ ;iilfi8'S^ '-9 ^ \ov HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0. 5189 OF 2010 Petitioner Versus Respondents Roseline Bachmann State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Ms. Hamida Siddiqui, Advoeate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate forthe State. Shri Anup Manjumdar, Advocate for the respondent No.4. ORDER (ORALl (Passed on 09th day of September, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner,seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse of appropriate forum that may be avaiiable under provisions of law. 2. Learned counselappearing for other side have no objection. 3. It is ordered, as prayed for. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the above-stated liberty. __——^--, Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge