In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. *** CR No.1987 of 2011 (O&M) Decided on 22.3.2011. Mohinder Singh --Petitioner vs. Arvind Malhotra Advocate --Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.Rajinder Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner Rakesh Kumar Jain,J: (Oral) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not wish to press this revision petition on merit. Hence, the same is dismissed in limine. However, he prays for time to vacate the demised premises. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case in which the claim of the petitioner is that he is in possession of the demised premises since 1993 and would require some time to find out an alternate accommodation, a period of three months is granted to vacate the demised premises on or before 24.6.2011 subject to his furnishing an undertaking before the learned Rent Controller, Kaithal in that regard and clearing all the arrears of rent if any due. He is directed to pay the rent of the ensuing month till the month of CR No.1987 of 2011 (O&M) -2- June,2011. It is also made clear that in case, undertaking which is to be filed is violated by the petitioner, then he would be liable to be prosecuted in terms of the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. 22.03.2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge