IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.23807 of 2001 Between: Smt. Anita Sen W/o Swaranjit Sen Precious Moments (Society Regd. No. 8698/99), R/o 178, Prasashan Nagar, Road No. 74, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Director, Women & Children Welfare, Govt. of A.P. Hyderabad. 2 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Women Development and Children Welfare Department Secretariate, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus direct the respondents to setaside the notiﬁcation Lr.No. 2916/E.O-III/01, dated 11-10-2001, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.J.SATYA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.23807 of 2001 ORDER: Petitioner questions the Notiﬁcation issued by the respondents in Lr.No.2916/E.O-III/01, dated 11-10-2001. When the matter has been taken up for hearing on 31-07- 2008, none appeared for the petitioner and, therefore, the matter was directed to be posted “for dismissal”. Today also, when the matter is taken up for hearing, neither learned counsel for the petitioner is present nor is there any representation on his behalf. Admittedly, no stay has been granted by this court. Therefore, I am of the opinion that the cause in the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 07-08-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{SRAVAN}