WP(C) 4656/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE ANIMA HAZARIKA Heard Mr DP Borah, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr AD Choududhury, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department appearing for the State recpondents.. The instant writ petition is filed by the petitioners, seventeen (17) in numbers , with the prayer for a direction to the respondents to grant the benefit of the Office Memorandum dated 21.01.2004 (Annexure -2) to the writ petition, wherein the Commissioner and Secretary to the Government of Assam has stated that the re gularization of the services of the honorary teachers who were appointed by the Managing Committee after the provincialisation of the schools cannot be done. Ho wever, when they will apply for regular post, following to an advertisement issu ed by the authority for interview, then the preference to the honorary teachers in the form of relaxation of age for their experience can be provided. Both the learned counsel submits that the prayer of the petitioners for providin g the benefit of the Office Memorandum dated 21.01.2004 has been considered bein g WP(C) No. 506 of 2006, wherein, while disposing the aforesaid writ petition di rected the official respondents to extend the benefits of the Office Memorandum dated 21.01.2004 to the petitioners as and when a process is initiated for appoi ntment to the posts to which the said office memorandum is applicable. In view of the above, this Court is closing the instant writ petition with a dir ection to the official respondents to consider the case of the petitioners takin g note of order of this Court in WP(C) No. 506 of 2006 and provide them some pre ference relaxing their age extending the office memorandum as stated (Supra) sub ject to they applied for regular posts. With the aforesaid order, the instant writ petition is disposed of.