IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 20248 of 1994 Between: Smt. Gampala Kondara Rajulu, W/o Late Chandra Rao, R/o A.V. Nagaram, Thondangi (M), E.G.Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The chairman Land Reforms Tribunal, Kakinada, E.G.Dist. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer Peddapuram, E.G.Dist. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer Thondangi, E.g.Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS of any other appropriate writ, declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not considering the objection petition dated 2.11.94 filed by the petitioner herein in L.C.C. No.101/TNI/75 on the file of the Land Reforms Tribunal Kakinada, East Godavari Dist as illegal, arbitrary and void and for a consequential direction directing the 1st respondent to take the petition dated 2.11.94 filed by the petitioner on his file and to dispose of the same on merits and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.N.SIVA REDDY, ADVOCATE Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE The Court Made the Following : ORDER The petitioner herein questions the in action of the 1st respondent in considering the objection petition dated 2.11.1994 filed by the petitioner in L.C.C.No.101/TNI/75 on the file of the Land Reforms Tribunal, Kakinada as illegal and arbitrary and seeks expeditious disposal of his petition dated 02.11.1994. Heard both sides. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner filed a petition dated 02.11.1994 before the 1st respondent for exclusion of the land from her holding donated by her husband in the year 1964, the same has not taken on file and is still pending consideration. Having regard to the fact that the petition dated 2.11.1994 filed by the petitioner is still pending consideration with the 1st respondent without there being any reason, I deem it appropriate to direct the 1st respondent to take the petition filed by the petitioner on file and dispose of the same in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Writ petition is accordingly allowed. No costs. _______________ 2nd July 2004 BJ/Glv To 1. The Chairman, Land Reforms Tribunal, Kakinada, E.G.District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapuram, E.G.District. 3. The Mandal RevenueOfficer, Thondangi, E,G.District. 4. Two C.Cs to the Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. (O.U.T) 5. Two C.D. copies.