IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12565 of 2008 DR.M.MANIR SIDDIQUI @ MOHD.MUNEER SIDDIQUI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2/ 9/5/2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary spelling corrections in the prayer portion of the application. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the complainant. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a police case under Sections- 406 and 420 of I.P.C. As per allegations, the complainant has been duped of Rs.24, 00,000/- on promise to take certain persons on Haz pilgrimage when both, the complainant and the accused no.1, who is alleged to have duped, are travel agencies. Learned counsel for the complainant does not dispute the correctness of the situation that a sum of Rs.10,65,000/- has already been returned to the complainant by accused no.1. The allegation against the petitioner was that he received a sum of Rs.1, 80,000/- on behalf of accused No.1 and forwarded it to accused No.1. Apart from the generalized statement that the petitioner was a member of a gang of cheaters there is no pleading in the contempt that the petitioner was a part of the travel agency business of accused No.1. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case let the petitioner Dr.M.Manir Siddiqui @ Mohd. Muneer Siddiqui surrender before the court below within four weeks when he shall be - 2 - enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri S. Prasad, J.M., 1st Class, Araria in Complaint Case No.579/07. KC ( Navin Sinha,J )