IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1055/2008 Gama Khan -Vs. - State of Maharashtra. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM : S.R.DONGAONKAR, J DATED : 9 th APRIL, 2008. Heard Shri. Mirza, Advocate for the applicant and APP for the respondent State. Interim order was passed on 19/03/2008. It was observed that the alleged offence occurred on 20/12/2006, whereas the report was lodged on 03/01/2007. The learned APP has tried to explain and show that the complainant came to know about the offence at some later stage, therefore, it was lodged late. Learned APP has also opposed the application saying that the applicant is giving two different names to the Investigating Officer thereby causing unnecessary delay in investigation. It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the applicant that the names of the applicant are Gama and Maqbool Ahemad Kha and, therefore, he had told his name either Gama or Maqbool. He has not told any third name. In these circumstances, the interim order needs to be confirmed. The same is confirmed. In the event of arrest of applicant in respect of crime No.1/2007 of P.S. Ner for the offences under section 420, 467, 468, 471, 323, 506, r/w 34 of IPC, he be released on bail on furnishing surety and PRB of Rs.25,000/- subject to conditions that he shall report P.S. Ner as and when directed by the I.O. for the purposes of investigation and shall not directly or indirectly tamper with the prosecution evidence. The application stands disposed of. JUDGE GSK