^- -rsl^" € v m THB HIGII OOURT QF OIIHATTISGARH AT tlI^SPUR WmtPETITION (S)NO.<^^^ OF 20310 t»ETlTIONER: ^»' ^^' ^yy 'y RE^PONDENtS: Suresh Kumar Khte, ^/o Shri Sudha Ram K^t^aged about 31 years, R/0 SSrsiwan, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Raipur, ^resently posted and working as Medical pfficer, Primary Health Centre, Sarsiwan, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Raipur (CG). Versus -1. State ofChhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Health & Family Welfare, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). ' 2. Under Secretary, Department of Health & Family Welfare, DKS Bhawan, Mailtralaya, Raipur(CG). -3. Director, Health Services, Directorate, Chhatfisgarh, Raipur (CG). ^4. Commissioner, Health Servrices, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG). /5. State Health Committee, Chhattisgarh (Natiorial Rural Health Mission), through its Director, Raipur (CG). WMT PETITIQN UNOBR ARTICLE 226 QF THB CONSTlTimON OF INDIA "I .-<i Petitsoner HiGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH : BiLASPUR WRIT PETITSON (S) N0. 3864 OF 2010 Suresh Kumar Khute Versus ^ Resoondents State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Pet'rtion under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri V.R.Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer Tor the State/respondents. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on 10th day of February, 2011) 1. Learned counsei appearing for the petitsoner submits that the impugned order dated 15.7.2010 (Annexure P-1) has already been cancelled subsequentiy by order dated 23.10.2010. The order is taken on record. Thus, nothing sun/ives for adjudication in this matter. Accordingly, the petltlon has become infructuous. 2, Learned counsel appearing for other side does not controvert the above submissson. 3. In vsew of the foregoing, the writ petition is dismissed, as having become infructuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ashok