IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.1490 OF 2005 Hirappa Eknath Torne ...Appellant Versus Shankar Ramchandra Torane @ Daji Torane & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.S.S.Patwardhan for Appellant. None for Respondents. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. FEBRUARY 20, 2006. FEBRUARY 20, 2006. FEBRUARY 20, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the Appellant. This Appeal is essentially against concurrent finding of fact recorded by the two Courts below. It is not open for this Court to reappreciate the evidence on record to take a different view even if the same was a possible view. This is so because the findings recorded by the two Courts below is founded on the evidence on record and is a possible : 2 : view. 2. In my opinion, no substantial question of law arises for consideration. Dismissed. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.