..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2760 OF 2008 Abdul Salam Md.Illiyas Shaikh. ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. .... Mr.I.B.Singh, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 29th August, 2008. DATED : 29th August, 2008. DATED : 29th August, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.I-409 of 2006 of Turbhe Police Station. The said case is mainly under Sections 395, 397 of IPC and under Sections 3 & 25 of the Arms Act. 3. The complainant has stated that he withdrew the amount of Rs.5 lakh from the Union Bank and he was going to MAFCO company. At that time, the applicant and other persons came in a jeep and obstructed the car of the complainant. The accused persons got down from the jeep and they ..(2).. started assaulting the complainant with wooden log on his leg and head. The window of the car was also broken. The complainant received injures and fell down. Thereafter the accused persons took away the car of the complainant in which amount of Rs.5 lakh was there. The injury certificate of the complainant shows that he received injuries on the head, a fracture of knee and CLW’s on various parts of the body. The complainant has identified the present applicant as one of the person who had taken part in the incident. 4. The learned Advocate for the applicant submitted that co-accused have been released on bail and hence bail may be granted to the present applicant on the ground of parity. However, no order has been produced before me of any of the co-accused who were granted bail for this Court to verify whether it can be said to be a case of parity. As stated earlier, the complainant has identified the applicant as having taken part in the incident. Besides that it is seen that the incident occurred on 19.9.2006 and the applicant was absconding for about two and half months and he came to be arrested only on 2.12.2006. The ..(3).. applicant is also involved in C.R.No.I-272/2006 of Antop Hill police station. The said case is under Section 353, 506(2) of IPC. Looking to all the above facts, I am not inclined to grant bail. Application for bail is rejected. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)