Siwyg gum (5«P@ @ \ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR f‘ w. P. NO. 89 é?) /2004 WRIT PETITON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAIVIUS CERTIORARI ETC OR ANY OTHER DIRCTIONS OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER : As stated in the cause title above PETITIONER DINESH ‘? ~ S/oShriLateBhagirath Malviya 2 /@§9° aged about 34 Years occupation m . —Anurekhak,Revenue \ ‘ L é) rg§ Department r/o Surguja Qzgfyk b“ TahshilgzDistrict Surjguja (CG) ‘i ii \ VERSUS E RESPONDENTS 1. The State of C.G. Through the Secretary of l i Department ofRevenue w D‘K‘s‘ Bhawan, Raipux (co) ‘n 2. CouectgrSurguja (CG) Shri Bihdeshwari Prajapati, I ‘ Anurekhak,postedat O/Ocollector Land Records,Baikuntpur,District ’ Korea. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR g» ’d‘. §jj_\j(§LE BENCH : HGN’BLE MR. §ATISH K. AGNiHaTRLJJ WRIT PETiTiON NO.396§ OF 2§04 Petitioner : Dinesh Chandra Maiviya VQYSUS Respendents : ' The $tate cf C.G. and others Present : Mrs. Rem; Kochar, ccunsei for the petitioner. Ms. Deepaii Pandey, Pane! Lawye: for the State/re$pondentS No.1 and 2. None appears for respondent No.3. ORDER (Passed an 22““ Day of February, 2007) The petitioner, while wcrking as; Anurekhak in Revenue Department at Ambikapur, District Surguja has been transferred in the same capacity to Baikunthpur, District Korea of the said department. vide order dated 8-1 0-2004 (P4). 2. No stay order was granted by this (30m in this matter. The transfer erder must have been executed by the respondents. 3. Be that es it may, with the passageof time, this petition has become infruotuous as period of transfer is not appiicabie forever. At this point of time, there is no question to examine the vaiidity of the impugned transfer order. However, the respondents are at iiberty to pass appropriate orders keeping in View the public mterest and administrative exigency, without insisting on compiiance of the impugned transfer order. 4. lt is we“ sewed principle of Saw that transfer is an incident of service and it is for the employer to decided as to where a particuiar officerfempioyee be posted keeping in View public interest as we“ as r administrative exigency. This Court has limited jurisdiction to interfere in the transfer matter and this Court can interfere only in the ease of proved maia tide, non-comgetence of authority passing the transfer order and transier order not being in conformity with the ruies and regulations. in view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed oi. 5. No order as to costs. M Mil: Sd/- ' r Sarish K. Agnihon'i, Judge lb »r