IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M-30187 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 12.10.2010 ... Anil Kumar ................Petitioner vs. State of Punjab .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner ... K.C. Puri, J. As per allegation of the prosecution, petitioner has taken ` 15 lacs for getting permanent visa for the complainant and his wife. But instead of permanent visa, tourist visa from 22.5.2009 to 20.5.2019 was provided. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that complainant had gone abroad and returned back after one month. This itself is not a ground for grant of anticipatory bail. The gravity of offence does not make out a case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Consequently, the petition stands dismissed. ( K.C. Puri ) 12.10.2010 Judge chugh