8BS, HIGH COVRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B, : XQN'BLE^HRI SATISH K. AGNIHOTM,J. WMT PETITION fSYNo. 2237 of 2007 X£- A- RESPONDENTS SunitaEkka, after mamage Smt. Sunita Lakra, wife of Bhinsent Lakra, aged about 40 years, working as Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Gadhabhata, Sarangarh, Tehsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Seeretary, Education Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Commissioner, Educational Department, Pandit Ravishankar University, Campus, Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer, District Raigarh (C.G.) Shri Hari.sh Khuntiya, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State / respondents. (Passed on llm ofApril, 2007) Leamed courisel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the fact and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in Yashwant Kxmiar Bharadwaj Vs, [y f^ Atmt Municipal Corporation, Durg and another {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents does not controvert the said submission. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms ofthe order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Miinicipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B.T.I Examination Certificate on her own expenses as perthe circulars dated 24.12.1998 and Ql.03.1999 and further whether she has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK-Agnihotri Judge ii'