IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO : 10983 of 1997 Between: P.Kesavulu , S/o late Bushaiah, R/o. D.No.6, Gandhi Road, Tirupahi, Chittoor Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Manadal Revenue Officer, Tirupati Rural, Chittoor Dist. 2 The Dist.Collector, Chittoor. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ ,order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in issuing Roc.No.A/692/97,dt.2.5.1997 as illegal. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.Y.NARASIMHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : O R D E R: It is represented Sri.Y.Narasimha Rao, learned counsel representing that he had no further instructions. In view of the same, this Court directed the office to issue notice to the petitioner and post the writ petition after service of the notice on the writ petitioner. It is stated that the office had sent notice to the writ petitioner on 24-1- 2005 and the same was returned un-served with postal endorsement “Addressee left without instructions and whereabouts not known”. It is also stated that no learned counsel filed vakalat on behalf of the writ petitioner. In the light of the aforesaid facts taking into consideration, that this is sufficiently an old matter, the Writ Petition to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is hereby dismissed for default. No order as to costs. _________________ P.S.NARAYANA, J. 11th February, 2005. mrb To 1 The Manadal Revenue Officer, Tirupati Rural, Chittoor Dist. 2 The Dist.Collector, Chittoor. 3. Two CCs to G.P for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad(OUT). 4. Two CD copies.