IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.253 of 2008 ANIL KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 27.11.2008. N.H./ This revision has been preferred against the order of acquittal dated 1st October,2007 passed by F.T.C.III, Jehanabad in Sessions Trial No.724 of 2006. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the impugned judgment. On perusal of the impugned judgment, it is quite apparent that most of the material witnesses have turned hostile. There are several discrepancies in the evidence of the informant and his other family members. The postmortem report also does not support fully the allegations levelled against the accused persons. Under the facts and circumstances, I am of the view that the court below has rightly acquitted the opposite party given the benefit of doubt. I find no material to interfere in the order of acquittal. Accordingly, this application is dismissed at the admission stage. ( Ghanshyam Prasad )