IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.W.P. No. 5383 of 2010. Decided on 23rd November, 2010. Neena Kumari. ….Petitioner. Versus State of HP & others. …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the Petitioner: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate. For Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. AG, for respondents No.1 to 3. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved since she was replaced by a regular teacher. It is pointed out that a vacancy is due to arise on 31st March, 2011 on account of retirement in the Government Senior Secondary School, Barthin and that the 4th respondent can be accommodated in that vacancy, so that the petitioner can be continued as PTA ultimately she is replaced by a regular hand. The petitioner may point out the vacancy position or any other vacancy before the second respondent in which case the second respondent will make an attempt to see whether the 4th respondent can be accommodated in that vacancy and in case there is a resultant vacancy where the engagement on ad hoc basis is necessary, the petitioner will be re-engaged and continued. Appropriate orders in that regard shall be passed within two 2 months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment by the petitioner. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 23rd November, 2010. ( Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tr) Judge