IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 3RD SEPTEMBER 2010 / 12TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 27387 of 2010(W) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- ARUNA RANI.S, D/O.SAROJINI,CHARUVILA VEEDU,KADUVAYIL,KATTUMPURAM,ATTINGAL. BY ADV. SRI.SYAM J. SAM. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE REGISTRAR,SREE SANKARACHARYA SANSKRIT UNIVERSITY,KALADY – 683 531. 2. THE PRINCIPAL,REGIONAL CENTRE, SREE SANKARACHARYA SANSKRIT UNIVERSITY, VANCHIYOOR,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695 002. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI. P.K. VIJAYAMOHANAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/09/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.27387 of 2010 (W) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 3rd day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T According to the petitioner, her application for admission to M.A Course was declined to be accepted on the ground that she is over aged. It is stated that the University had entertained applications of only those candidates, who have not completed 32 years. It is in these circumstances, this writ petition has been filed relying on Ext.P4 order dated 20/07/2010 passed by this Court in WP(C) No.21870/2010 & connected case, where a direction was issued to consider the candidature of the petitioners therein, irrespective of the age fixed by the University. Irrespective of the merits of the contentions now raised by the petitioner, fact remains that the entrance examination for admission to the course in question was held by the University in June, 2010 and admission has been completed in July, 2010. Therefore, if the application of the petitioner was not accepted, she ought to have approached this Court at least before the University conducted the WP(C) No.27387/2010 -2- entrance examination and concluded the admission process. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is highly belated. For that reason, this writ petition cannot be entertained. The writ petition fails and is accordingly dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg