1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7364 OF 2008 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO. 14918 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3432 OF 2008 (Raju Martandrao Deshmukh .v. Bandu Ramrao Gawande and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri S.V. Sohoni, Advocate for the applicant. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. 19TH DECEMBER, 2008 Heard. Even assuming that the delay in filing of the appeal can be condoned, we have heard the learned Counsel for the appellant on merits of the appeal. We find that the petitioner was Up-sarpanch of the Village Panchayat. The allegation against him was that he has entered into the contract with the Village Panchayat and sold fodder to the Village Panchayat. The finding of fact to that effect is recorded concurrently by the authorities under the Village Panchayat Act. That finding has also accepted by the learned Single Judge of this Court. We see no reason to interfere with the same. In the Letters Patent Appeals to 2 disturb the finding of fact which is concurrent and which appears to be possible finding. Therefore, in our opinion, no useful purpose would be served in condoning the delay. Civil Application is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE *rrg.