1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.443 of 2006. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, office Memoranda of Coram Court's or Judge's appearances, Court's orders or directions order and Registrar's order. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr.D.B.Patel, A.P.P.for the State. CORAM: K.J.ROHEE & C.L.PANGARKAR,JJ. DATE : 6th November, 2006. 1. None for the petitioner. 2. Heard Mr.D.B.Patel, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondents no.8,9,11,12 and 13. 3. It appears that the petitioner was the President of “Raj-Nagar Mahila Mandal, Nagpur”, a Public Trust. It seems that in a meeting held on 23/12/2005 she could not be elected. The dispute about change report is pending before the Deputy Charity Commissioner. Even crime No.258 of 2003 under Section 143, 504, 506 of I.P.Code has been registered against the associates of the petitioner at 2 Police Station, Sadar, Nagpur. The reply/affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no.9 shows that there is no evidence to show that respondents no.1 to 5 had committed any cognizable offence like cheating, forgery, fraud or misappropriation of funds of said Public Trust. Thus, we find no merit in the present writ petition. The same is, therefore, dismissed in limine. JUDGE JUDGE pzc