IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.207 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: 25.8.2006 State of Haryana and another ...Appellants versus Sanju Devi and others ... Respondents CORAM:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uma Nath Singh. Hon'ble Mr.Justice Mahesh Grover. Present: Mr.S.K.Monga, DAG, Haryana for the appellants. Mr.Paul S.Saini, Advocate for respondent No.5. UMA NATH SINGH, J. (ORAL) Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 1. It appears from the rival submissions that the driver of the offending vehicle was issued a valid driving licence (No.4809 dated 7.11.1986) but the Investigator of the Insurance Company submitted a wrong report about some different driving licence with the same No. 4809 but having a different date of issuance as 7.9.1998. Learned counsel for the appellants has produced a report of the District Transport Officer (Licencing), Jaipur to that effect. Further, the said licence has also been found to be duly renewed by a different Transport Authority being the District Transport Officer, Sonepat, which covers the period of accident in question. Moreover, there is no dispute about the insurance of the vehicle. 2. Under the circumstances, we allow the appeal filed against the recovery right granted to the Insurance Company and modify the award accordingly. The rest of the award shall remain intact. ( UMA NATH SINGH ) JUDGE August 25, 2006 ( MAHESH GROVER ) pk JUDGE