IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25404 of 2010 RAJENDRA PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 28.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner was rejected by a reasoned order on 11.12.2008 in Cr. Misc. No. 48471 of 2008. The fact that co-accused may have been granted anticipatory bail subsequently in Cr. Misc. No. 2820 of 2009 and Cr. Misc. No. 10193 of 2010 is not sufficient ground to re-consider the prayer for anticipatory bail. In fact, in the last order, it has been noticed that the deceased himself stated that he was thrown from the roof. The fact remains that two co-accused have subsequently been granted anticipatory bail by this Court. The prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected with the observation that any application for regular bail on behalf of him required to be considered in the background of grant of anticipatory bail to co-accused without being prejudiced by the present order. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)