IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 4423 of 2008 Decided on: 10.3.2011 Smt. Raj Marjara …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. Neel Kamal sood, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Petitioner has already made a representation to the Deputy Director (Education), Solan for the redressal of his grievance. The petitioner has already attained the age of superannuation, however, the representation has not been decided till date. 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the Principal Secretary (Education) to decide the representation made by the petitioner within a period of two months after production of certified copy of the judgment by the petitioner. It is made clear that the pleas raised in the representation made by the petitioner shall be considered by the Principal Secretary 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- (Education) after affording him an opportunity of personal hearing. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge March 10, 2011 (K. Attri)