IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20599 of 2011 Yogendra Pd. Singh @ Yogendra Singh Versus The State Of Bihar with Cr.Misc. No.21524 of 2011 Sheo Mahato & Ors.. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- For the Petitioner - : Mr. Shakti Suman Kumar, Adv. For the State -: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, A.P.P. (In Cr. Misc. No. 20599 of 2011) 02/- 19/07/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Since both the applications are relating with one case, so it is being heard and disposed of by this composite order. Petitioners are named accused in this case who were entrusted with some government scheme and accordingly funds were allotted. So far, petitioner no. 1, namely, Yogendra Pd. Singh @ Yogendra Singh (in Cr. Misc. No. 20599 of 2011) is concerned, he vide Annexure – 3 sought due permission to proceed with the execution of scheme, but it is yet to be granted. Petitioners in other application (in Cr. Misc. No. 21524 of 2011) have proceed with and also furnished some account as regard to the amount withdrawn by them. Further, D.D.C. (District Development Commissioner), Motihari appears not appriciating filing of the case through his Letter No. 265 dated 06.03.2009. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four 2 weeks, let the petitioners, namely, Yogendra Pd. Singh @ Yogendra Singh (in Cr. Misc. No. 20599/2011) and Sheo Mahato, Arun Kumar Prasad, Ful Kumari Devi and Birendra Pd. Yadav (in Cr. Misc. No. 21524/2011), be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari, in connection with Motihari Town P.S. Case No. 275 of 2008, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)