SJ ^".fe'"r"~3^?>.^ 'ik ^l^ Ki'i'KilBW' -4it H!GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT SILASPUR Writ Petition No. 3220 of 2004 PeStioner Sl Shyamji Sahu, S/o Late Jagat Ram Sahu, Aged about 64 years, Retired Lecturer, Gram Salfa, Post Sargaon Via Bilha Dist: Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. State csf Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur, Dist: Raipur (C.G.) The Director, Publlc Education, Raipur, Dist: Raipur (C.G.)(C.G.) District Education Officer, Bilaspur, Dist: Bitaspur (C.G.) Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts and Pension, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur 2. 3. 4. 5. (C.G.) The Principal, Government Hi.gher Secondary Schoo!, Patharia, Dist: Bilaspur. WRIT PETITOIN UNDER ARTICLE 225/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDiA Slngie Bench : Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Adhiraj Surana, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Alok Bakshi, Govt. Advocate forthe respondente. S! 2. ORAL ORDER (Passed on Uiis 12ut day of March, 2008) 1. This matter pertains to retrial dues. This Court in ttie matter ofWrit Petition No. 4642/2<XM (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhatttegarh & others) and other connected matters, decided on 31.1.2008, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retriai dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Govemment. pureuant to the order dated 19.6.2(X)6 passec! in W.P.No. 1961^K^ (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Govemment and othere) and order dated 15.2.20C®passed in W.P.No. 1323/20^ (Navin Kumar Bisariya Vs. State of ChhatKsgarh and another). Thus, this petition is squarety ^l 1 'S;:?'3?\ % n. ^"^S J %^€/ w covered by the judgment and order dated 31* of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandai Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & others) and other connected matters, as submitted by learned counsel appearing for the parties. W the consent of ths partiss, this pefiSon is accordingly disposed of in the sam& tsrms i.e. the ofRce of tte Acivocate Genera! te dsrscted to send the case to fhe Committee, within a period of 15 days from tte date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the Committee shai! issue notice to the petitioner and the ofRcers concemed, within a fartier period of 15 days. The Committee shal! consider and pass order, in accordsnce wth law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petltioner. The pefitioner and ttie officer concemed may fite additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retrial dues, if any, to the petitioner be completed wtthin a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petiSoner shal! suppiy extra copy of the petition to leamed counsel appearing for Vr,e respondents, for onward transmission to the said comm'rttes. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur