IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.9569 of 2010 CHINTU SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 05.04.2010 On 29.3.2010, the petitioner had been granted bail by this court but while signing the order it was discovered that even though the name of the petitioner having been working in UNICEF is Jyoti Shekhar, but the petitioner has been described as “Chintu Sharma” in the petition. Therefore, the case was listed under the heading “To be Mentioned” and the order dated 29.3.2010 was not given effect to. Today, a supplementary affidavit has been filed bringing on record a petition filed in the court below, wherein, specific assertion has been made that the petitioner is also named as Jyoti Shekhar in formal terms. In view of such and since the ambiguity in the name of the petitioner has been clarified, let the order dated 29.3.2010, by which the petitioner was granted bail, be given effect to. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)