IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-11674 of 2008 Date of decision : 26.8.2008 Sunder Singh .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent **** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. V.S.Rana,Advocate for the petitioner Mr. S.S.Mor,Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana S. D. ANAND, J. The request made by the petitioner for his release on parole to get his house repaired was declined by the Divisional Commissioner, Hisar Division, Hisar, with the observation that “convict's father is able to do the repair of the house”. That finding is based upon a report made by Superintendent of Police, Hisar. The premise for declining the request is plainly illogical. There is no averment that there is no house in the name of petitioner-prisoner. That being so, it is he only who is entitled to raise a claim for his release on parole to be able to effect the repair of his house. The petition shall stand allowed. The petitioner-prisoner is allowed parole for four weeks to get his house repaired. August 26, 2008 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE Note: Whether to be referred to Reporter: Yes/No