IN THE fflGH COURT OF JVDICATURE AT BILASPUR VKKlWSmSMVO. 13t/0 /a506 PETmONER ,c,Yc^ Single Beneli ^' ASHOKSNGHTHABNB(Patwari) ^.-•^y ^Agedd>out31Yis.S/oSlBiDigyijay <' ..••'!'2&' ../ <^^Sm^, Nea'Jaapad School Tahsilpaia ..-'(•^y' ..••'' KoadagaonDistrict.Bastar. O^' ..•E<\t')'< ^' ClfflATnSOABH ^ ^?:' Pwited as Adhytan Patwari Tahsul ..-•'..^'y^ OtBeeKnadagBim ^ ^ y District, Bastar. CHHATTISGARH ^'\/"./"' —-"—.. t. CT^iUS RESTONBENTS .State ofChhattl^e*u'h Through the Secretary, ^Departmeat of Revenue, D.K.S.Bhavan, Mantralya i?aipur.{Chhattis®arh) Tbc CoUector- Baatar, Laad Record, Collectorate Jagdalpur, Bastar ,Chhattfsgarh Tahrildar IKbndagaon District, Bastar. Chfaattisgarh 4. T.P. ffaadey (Patwari}, Posted at P.H.No. 18-A Kondagaon TehsU ^ Kondagaon, Distt. Bastar (Chhattisgarh) TOUT HBFITKW VSOSS. ARnCIA 226/3827 OP TBE coBSTiTimoa or CTDIA ?OR ISSBANCB OF WKTF ai THB VKtvsat or cssKtKOtssa auuiDMros BTC ABD F'OR AKPR01!>Rtft.TS OttDER/ OSDCTS. IMRBCTtOK/ DtRBCTIOWS. " .e petitioner tnost Inunbly and Tesp«:tfirilybegs to submit as under: - XI-HC-22 3D^[^iI 'fe;ris'3D^i sFiNT'gft? 4». ^er -sii^w^, "g'ate'is, ^nwp *»? Sllt^I'RtiIWtTittT B;WQ..' Mr. Prakash Tivvari, counsel Miss Dipaii, Pandey, Panel l fie petitioner. . irfor Stale/respondents No,1 to 3. m ens In this petition, the petitioner's Vi'orking as Patwarl io the office pf T 2005, in pursuance of the eariier ord| referred io the impugned order Annex< the Impugned orcier the present piace shown as Paivvari Haika No.18-A, Kon]J that place, therefore, it is a mistake wh| su.ch he Is not belhg relieved from thj Patwari Haika-No.lS-A, Kondagaon, T^ petitioner had rnade a represaitation been done. in the situation, respondent No| and while considering representation of appropriate order wil'nin a period of 2 (•( 1 of this order. It is unfortunate that in spite of concerned authority has not taken lnt<) order and to rectif" the'same which I1i 1 petition before fhis Court, therefore, tl Rs.1,000/-. '^ ^ With the direction aforesaid, the| Consequently, M.(V\?.)P. Ho.lAt Parties are entitled for certified ^rafefr? tn'Eisff ^ fetzt ^fsRgrc ^; .sTpgif sn^i fiain grievance is that presently he is ihsiidar, Kondaaaon from 1 October ir dated 16-9-2005 which has been (ire-P''1 dated 13-3-2006 whereas, in lofposting of the petitioner has been ]jagaon. In fact, he is not working at |ch has been crept-in in this order, as 'ehsi! Office Kondagaon to join at ^hsil Kondagaon. in this respect, the t>n 29-3-2005, but so far nofhing has |1 is directed to verify the above .fact tne petltioner dated. 29-3-2005,- pass ^eeks from the dat" of receipt of copy the represeniation dated 29-3-2005 ^ accouht the mistake'crept-in in the is foreed the petitioner to move the Detitioner is entitied for the cqst of Ho iDetition stands disposed of. P/2006 aiso stands disposed of. »offhis ordet. . qopy ^, Sdi- L.c. Bhadoo 3ud9e ^ ^°