IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42722 of 2011 Bachnu Yadav, S/O-Late Ghura Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 02 23.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Allegedly, petitioner assaulted the injured with lathi and it would appear from perusal of the impugned order itself, that the other co-accused had already been granted privilege of bail by the learned predecessor of the presiding officer who rejected the bail petition of the petitioner. It further appears from the impugned order that the aforesaid fact was brought to the notice of learned Sessions Judge, Aurangabad but in spite of that he rejected the prayer for bail of the petitioner on the assumption that the injured had received grievous injuries whereas in the previous order, it had clearly been mentioned that the injured had received simple injuries. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Daudnagar, Aurangabad in connection with Haspura P.S. Case No. 100 of 2011. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)