IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3169 of 2006 PARWATI DEVI, W/O LATE RAM SEWAK RAM, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KUSHI HARPUR RAMNI, P.S.-KANTI, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR. ……………………PETITIONER. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR. 2. SRI DEEPAK KUMAR PRESENTLY POSTED AS COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY, HEALTH DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIAHR, PATNA. 3. MRS. GEETA PRASAD PRESENTLY POSTED AS DIRECTOR, HEALTH SERVICES, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. DR. RAM NAGINA PRASAD SINGH PRESENTLY POSTED AS CIVIL SURGEON-CUM-CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, MUZAFFRPUR. 5. DR. DINESHWAR PRASAD PRESENTLY POSTED AS MEDICAL OFFICER, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, MOTIPUR, ANCHAL-MOTIPUR, DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR. ……………………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 4 19.01.2009 Pursuant to the order dated 23.12.2008, the opposite parties have filed show cause. In the show cause they have disclosed that after the death of the concerned Government employee in harness on 24th April 1998 steps were taken to release payments under different heads as found admissible to his heirs and time to time payments were released to the petitioner in the year 1998, 1999 and 2000 under different heads. Thereafter also payments have been released to the petitioner after disposal of the writ application and after filing of the contempt application. Learned counsel for the petitioner disputes some calculation with regard to admissible amount of Group Insurance and contends that the exact amount of Group Insurance with interest as admissible to the petitioner as per the scheme of the Government annexed as Annexure-3 to the contempt application has not been made. 2 In contempt jurisdiction this Court can not go into the question of correctness of the calculation made by the opposite parties in the matter. In the circumstances, this contempt application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before the concerned authorities with her own calculation for claim of any amount which was found still due from them. In case the representation is filed within one month the concerned authorities shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders in the matter within two months thereafter. It goes without saying that if any further amount is found due to the petitioner the same shall also be paid to her within that period. The contempt application is thus disposed of. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh , J. )