1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:20.10.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Criminal Original Petition (MD) No.4694 of 2011 K.Harikrishnan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Commissioner Of Police, Madurai City. 2.The Inspector of Police, Mathichiam Police Station, Mathichiam, Madurai. ... Respondents This petition is preferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C to direct the respondents to give effective police protection for life and liberty of the petitioner in view of the representation dated 01.04.2011. For Petitioner :No representation (Mr.M.Sheik Abdullah) For Respondents :Mrs.S.Prabha Govt. Advocate(Crl.Side) ORDER When this matter was listed on 09.04.2011, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Again, it was adjourned on 27.04.2011. On that day also, there was no representation. Subsequently, when it was listed on 19.10.2011, there was no representation. However, with a view to grant yet another opportunity, this matter was ordered to be listed 'for dismissal' on 20.10.2011. Today when it was listed 'for dismissal', still there was no representation. It shows that the learned counsel for the petitioner is not having any interest in prosecuting this matter. Hence, this petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Commissioner Of Police, Madurai City. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2.The Inspector of Police, Mathichiam Police Station, Mathichiam, Madurai. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Vs ssk/04.11.2011 /4c-2p/- Crl.O.P.(md).No.4694 of 2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/