IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 26076 of 2008 Between: Smt V.Rochamma W/o. V.Changaiah Gandhipuram(V) Pudipata Post Tirupathi Rural (M) Chittoor District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Tahasildar(MRO) Tirupati Rural Mandal at Tirupathi,Chittoor District 2 The District Collector Chittoor District at Chittoor District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more mostly one which is in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the endorsment in L.Dis (A) 916/2007 dt 1-10-2007 of the 1st respondent has illegal irregular arbitrary unjustified unsustainable and setaside the same directing the respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for assignment of an extent of 1.00 acre in Sy No.515/B of Pudipatla(V) Tirupathi Rural(M) Chittoor District without reference to the ground mentioned in endorsement in Dis(A) 916/2007 dt 1-10-2007 of the 1st respondent and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.VEERA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following Order: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.26076 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner is resident of Gandhipuram Village, Tirupathi Rural Mandal, Chittor District. Alleging that her father-in-law occupied land to an extent of Ac.1.00 in survey No.515/B and cultivating the same, she filed W.P.No.18064 of 2007 after death of her father-in-law for appropriate orders by concerned authority for grant of patta. This Court disposed of said writ petition on 28.08.2007 directing first respondent herein to pass necessary orders on her application. In obedience thereto by endorsement dated 01.10.2007 first respondent informed the petitioner that land admeasuring Acs.1.85 in survey No.515/B at Pudipatla Village is classified as vanka poramboke and therefore, assignment cannot be granted. In this writ petition filed challenging said endorsement, contention raised is while denying assignment to the petitioner the respondents are taking steps for assigning the land as house site pattas and therefore, she has been discriminated. Having regard to the only submission made by the petitioner as noticed supra, this Court directed learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (General - Andhra Area) to get instructions. Today, after getting instructions, it is submitted by learned Assistant Government Pleader that the land in question is not proposed for grant of house sites as alleged by the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed as one based on facts, which are not correct. However, the petitioner is given liberty to seek alternative land, if she is eligible. With the above observations, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. _____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 01st December, 2008 GHN To 1 The Tahasildar(MRO) Tirupati Rural Mandal at Tirupathi,Chittoor District 2 The District Collector Chittoor District at Chittoor District 3 2CCs to GP for Revenue 4 2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{BMR}