1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5947 OF 2010 DNYANESHWAR BANKATRAO KSHIRSAGAR Age : 25 YEARS, OCCU.SERVICE AS AN ASSISTANT TEACHER IN GRAMIN PRASHALA MADAJ, TAL. UMERGA, OSMANABAD .. PETITIONER VERSUS 1. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION LATUR REGION, LATUR, DIST.LATUR 2. THE EDUCATION OFFICER (SECONDARY) ZILLA PARISHAD, OSMANABAD. TALUKA AND DISTRICT OSMANABAD (3) THE SECRETARY } DELETED AS SHRI CHATRAPATI SHIVAJI TARUN MANDAL, } PER LEAVE OF MADAJ, TQ. UMERGA, DIST. OSMANABAD. } THE COURT } DT.12.7.2010 (4) THE HEAD MASTER } GRAMIN PRASHALA, MADAJ, } TQ. UMERGA, DIST. OSMANABAD ..RESPONDENTS Mr.V.D.Gunale, Advocate for petitioner Mr.N.B.Khandare, Government Pleader for respondents 1 and 2 Respondent Nos.3 and 4 deleted as per Court’s leave dated 12.7.2010 CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ DATE : 12th July 2010 2 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER P.V.HARDAS, J.) 1. Mr.Gunale, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to delete respondents 3 and 4 in the light of the fact that the petitioner only prays for directing respondent No.2 to decide the pending proposal seeking approval to the appointment of the petitioner. In that light of the matter, therefore, leave granted and respondents 3 and 4 are permitted to be deleted at the risk of the petitioner. 2. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties, this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission. 3. We need not dilate on the factual aspects of the petitioner’s case as suffice it to state that the proposal seeking approval to the appointment of the petitioner as an Assistant Teacher came to be submitted to the Education Officer (Secondary) on 2.9.2009. Mr.Gunale, learned Counsel states that the said proposal is pending and has not been decided by respondent No.2. 4. In the light of the fact that the proposal seeking approval to the appointment of the petitioner is pending with respondent No. 2, we allow this petition and direct respondent No.2 to decide the 3 proposal of the petitioner, if pending, in accordance with law, within four weeks from today and communicate the decision thereon to the petitioner. Rule made absolute on the above terms with no orders as to costs. ( N.D.DESHPANDE ) ( P.V.HARDAS ) JUDGE JUDGE (vvr/5947.10wp)