^\ c c4 !" "-"1 v^ BEFORB IHE HON'BLE HlBiBH COUR'E_ OF CHHAITISGAEH AT BIIASPUR IL. P. _NO .5>c~ c:''13 / 2 004 -j ^ PETITIOBER ;\^^ ^>"'1^£- Qyc^y %y -:bk*'f-fl .*•'" a* -^Kbamn Singh . Dhur-ve s/o La-te Rajaram Dhur'se, aged about 33 years. R/o Bhimbhouri, post Deori, Tahsil Dhamdha, Dist'; Durg (c.G.). ^ <F A~ ^" ^~ / ^y R_ESPONDENTS VERSUS A 1 s< k^^ 2. State of cihhattisgar'n Ihrough : Secretary, nepartment. of Educat.ion, B.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). State of Madhya Pradesh Througb : Secretary, Department. of Educa-tion, Bhopal (M.P.). •Onion o£ India, Delhi. 4. collect.or, Durg. 5. Distric'fc Education officer, Durg. 6. Block Development Edueation Officer lahsil Dbamdha, Dist ; Durg (C.'"'.). 'f.RI'r PETITION UKDER ARIICLE 226 OF TriE CONS'rITO'EION QF XtiDIA__;E-OR_ ISS'UABCE &r_ 1fi_RIT_IK THE HATURE OP M&NDAI'IUS i CEK'riOR&RI Al®02HER APPROPRlAIE toRIIS/ORDERS/DIRECTIOHS ^.^ HIGHCOUST OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR SINGLB BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. WRIT PBTITION N0.5000 OF 2004 Petitioner Respondents versus Khamn Sineh Dhurve State of Chhattisgarh aad othera Present : Ms. Sudha Agrawal, counsel for fhe petitioner. Mr. V.V.S.Murthy, Depuly Advocate General for respondenfs No. 1, 4, 5 and 6. None appears for respondents No.2 and 3. ORAL ORDBR {21-* April, 2006) The petitioner's father Shri Rajaram Dhurve died on 29- 10-1999 ia haruess wlule workiag as Head Master ia Primary School, at Deori. Learued counsel for fhe petitioner submits fliat an applicatiou for conipassionate appointment was inimediately fhereafter filed by the petitioncr which was dulv processed by respondent No.6 vide Aiuiexure P/ 1, but tiU date, his appUcatioii for coinpassionate appointaieiit has not been decided. 2. The Gtovenuu.ent of Chhattisgarh, by its circular dated 2- 2-2006, has directed aU the departiaents to consider cases of aU the eligible dependaat-legal heir of fhe einployees, who died ia haruess between 1-11-1997 to 31-10-2000 for compassionate appouitaient. 3. Accordiugly, fhe Govenuaent of Chhattisgarh is directed to consider fhe case ofthe petitioner as per its own circular dated 2- -•2- - 2-2006 aud also ia view ofthe order dated 20-12-2005 passed by iiads Court ia Writ Petition No. 1322/2002 aad other connected matters on its own nierit, m. accordance with law, on sucli representation being filed by fhe oetitioner. 4. For the reasons stated above, fhe writ petition staads disposed of. No oider as to costs. Certified copy as per rules. ____--- -—-—-- Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge i icpsl ^^