IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18274 of 2008 SK.SALIM @ MD.SALIM & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 2.7.2008. Counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary correction in the name of petitioner no.4. Petitioner no.1 is father-in-law, petitioner no.2 is mother-in-law, petitioner nos.3 and 4 are sister-in-law and petitioner no.5 and 6 are brother- in-law of the complainant. It has been submitted by the petitioners counsel that the marriage of the complainant and the daughter of petitioner no.1 and 2 was Golat marriage. Since the daughter of petitioner no.1 and 2 filed a complaint case under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, in response to that complainant also filed case against her husband and family members. It has also been submitted that now the dispute has almost resolved and the complainant started residing at her husband’s place. Considering this fact prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. The petitioners namely 1. Sk. Salim alias Md. Salim 2. Bibi Naheda alias Naheda 3. Bibi Nasera alias Nasera alias Nasera Khatoon 4. Zakrun Khatoon 5. Kalu and 6. Nahid are directed to surrender before the C.J.M. Katihar within four weeks from today and on their so surrendering they shall be enlarged on bail on their furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Katihar in connection with Complaint case no.2537 of 2007 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Sss/- (Mridula Mishra, J)