IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 28TH OCTOBER 2008 / 6TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 31525 of 2008(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- R.BHASKARAN, S/O.RAGHAVA PANICKER, MUKALUVILA VEEDU, MELKULANGARA, VAYAKKAL P.O., VALAKOM VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, COLLECTORATE, KOLLAM. 3. THE UMMANNOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.Q-219, UMMANNOOR, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. R1, R2 BY GOVT. PELADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.31525 OF 2008 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of October, 2008 JUDGMENT Having regard to the nature of the order being issued hereunder, notice to the respondents dispensed with, preserving their right to move for review of this judgment, if aggrieved. The petitioner states that he is a debtor of the third respondent and has moved the second respondent for certain directions regarding the benefit of One Time Settlement scheme and the second respondent issued orders thereon, however, that the third respondent is not complying with the same. This Court is not to execute orders passed by the Joint Registrar. The petitioner has efficacious alternate remedy of moving the Joint Registrar complaining about the non compliance of the order in Ext.P3 within the format of law contained in the Kerala Co- operative Societies Act and Rules. The second respondent has sufficient authority and power to ensure compliance of its orders, unless those decisions are interfered by superior authorities. Hence, this writ petition is ordered directing the WPC.31525/08 Page numbers second respondent to consider any grievance of the petitioner as regards what is stated above and take appropriate action in accordance with law, at the earliest, on production of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.