IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 17798 of 2004 BETWEEN: Saladi Satyanarayana, S/o. Chilakayya, R/o. Penumalla, Kajuluru Mandal, E.G. District. ... PETITIONER AND 1. Govt of A.P., rep. by its Secretary, School Education, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Kakinada, E.G. District. 3. R.J.D. School Education, E.G. District. 4. Talatam Krishna Madhava Rao, S/o. Late Sattiyya, R/o. Penumalla Village, Kajuluru Mandal, E.G. District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to Issue a writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, quashing the impugned proceedings vide Rc.No.B4/4603/03, dated 20.9.2004, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent is illegal, arbitrary and against the principled of natural justice and further directing the 3rd respondent to conduct a detailed enquiry by appointing a special officer and obtain a report and take action according to law by duly giving an opportunity to me to represent my case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MRS.D.GEETHA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR EDUCATION MR. S.U.V. SRINIVAS The Court made the following: ORDER: When the matter was taken up for hearing on 21.04.2008, as neither the petitioner appeared nor there was any representation on his behalf, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Today also, when the matter is taken up for hearing, neither the petitioner appears nor there is any representation on his behalf. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J May 2, 2008 DSK