IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHL AT NAINITAL Dated Nainital the 4th day of January, 2006. Bail Application No. 1138 of 2005 Dharamveer S/o Baru R/o Village Thithki P.S. Manglaur District Haridwar Applicant. Versus State of Uttaranchal Opposite party. ____________________________________________________________ Arising out of case Crime No. 135/2005 U/Ss 394, 397, 411, 120-B I.P.C. P.S. Gangnahar Roorkee, District Haridwar By the court Hon’ble B.C.Kandpal,J. The applicant has applied for bail in case crime No. 135 of 2005, under Sections 394, 397, 411, 120-B I.P.C. P.S. Gangnahar Roorkee, District Haridwar. Heard Sri Navneet Kaushik, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA, and perused the record. The record reveals that the applicant is not named in the First Information Report and his name came in to light for the first time, on the basis of the statement of the co-accused Sompal during the course of investigation. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I think it would be just and proper to release the applicant on bail at this stage. Let the applicant Dharmveer be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. (B.C.Kandpal, J.) 04-01-2006 Bisht