IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 26TH JUNE 2008 / 5TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 19208 of 2008(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ RESHMA.R., 5TH SEMESTER STUDENT, B.TECH COMPUTER SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, TKR ENGINEERING COLLEGE, TRIKKARIPUR. BY ADV. SRI.K.B.GANGESH SMT.SMITHA CHATHANARAMBATH RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, KALAMASSERY. 2. THE PRINCIPAL, TKR ENGINEERING COLLEGE, TRIKKARIPUR, CHEEMENI. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. S.P. ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAI-SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.19208 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of June, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner is a 5th Semester student of B.Tech Course in the 2nd respondent's College affiliated to the 1st respondent University. She wrote the 1st and 2nd Semester combined examinations of the course in May 2007, results of which were published on 8.2.2008. In respect of three subjects, the petitioner applied for revaluation. Out of the three, for the subject of Engineering Physics paper, on revaluation, the petitioner obtained very high marks in that subject. However, revaluation for the subjects of Engineering Mechanics and Civil and Mechanical Engineering has not been completed yet. According to the petitioner, there has been widespread complaints about the valuation already made and common revaluation has been conducted in respect of other subjects. The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to complete the W.P.(c)No.19208/08 2 revaluation process in respect of Engineering Mechanics and Civil and Mechanical Engineering also as per Ext.P1 common application submitted by the 2nd respondent. 2. I have heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 1st respondent also. The 1st respondent submits that they would require two more months' time to complete the revaluation process. Having heard both sides, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to complete the revaluation process for which the petitioner has applied for, as evidenced by Ext.P1 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd W.P.(c)No.19208/08 3