IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH JUNE 2011 / 25TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 14412 of 2011(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- A.RAGHAVAN, AGED 71 YEARS, S/O.LATE HANUMAN, GEETHA BHAVAN, THATHAMPALLY P.O., ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF COCHIN, ERNAKULAM-682011. 2. THE PLANNING OFFICER, CORPORATION OF COCHIN, ERNAKULAM-68201. 3. THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (COMMERCIAL), BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.K.J.MANU RAJ, SC, COCHIN CORPORATION THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: krj WP(C).No. 14412 of 2011(B) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- P1:-COPY OF THE NO OBJECTION CERTIFICATE DATED 16/5/1990 ISSUED BY SRI.P.J. MATHEW, PALAI, ARANGATH CROSS ROAD, COCHIN-18. P2:-COPY OF THE ORDER NO.1869/93-ACTR DATED 11/10/1993 OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSION OF POLICE, TRAFFIC, KOCHI CITY. P3: -COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 28/2/1990 ISSUED BY THE COMMERCIAL OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TELECOM DISTRICT MANAGER, ERNAKULAM. P4:-COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 17/5/1994 ISSUED BY THE TOWN PLANNING OFFICER, COCHIN. P5:-COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 11/8/2004 ISSUERD BY THE CHAIRMAN AND SUPERINDENDENT, DISTRICT HOSPITAL, ERNAKULAM. P6:- COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 8/11/2004 IN W.P(C) NO.32629/2004 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. P7:- COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 5/1/2005 IN W.P(C) NO.32629/2004 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. P8:- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 11/1/2005 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT. P9:- COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 5/10/2005 IN CON.CASE (C) NO.1058/05 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS :- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C) No.14412 of 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated the 15th day of June, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner, who was running a telephone booth was ousted from the premises, which led to the filing of W.P(C) No.32629 of 2004 culminating in Ext.P7 judgment. The only direction in Ext.P7 judgment dated 05.01.2005 was to consider the representation to be preferred by the petitioner and to pass appropriate orders within the time specified therein. Alleging that the same was not complied with, the petitioner approached this Court by filing C.C.C No.1058 of 2005, which was also disposed of as per Ext.P9 order dated 05.10.2005, taking note of the submission made before this Court that the petitioner should appear before the respondent on 15.10.2005 at 11 AM and his grievance will be considered. It appears that the petitioner was simply sleeping over the issue for nearly six years after passing the aforesaid verdict/order and has turned up now before this Court by filing the present writ petition. 2. Even, assuming that there is any contumacious conduct on the part of the first respondent in complying with the direction given by this Court in Ext.P7, the same has also become stale in W.P(C) NO.14412 of 2011(B) -:2:- view of the law declared by the Full Bench of this Court in Damodaran v. Cherkalam Abdulla (2007 (2) KLT 171). Writ Petition is devoid of any merit. It is dismissed as accordingly. Sd/- P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE krj