Civil Writ Petition No.22120 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.22120 of 2010 Date of Decision: 15th July,2011. Puran Singh and Others ...Petitioners Versus Haryana Vidut Prasaran Nigam Ltd and Others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR Present: Mr.S.S.Rana Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Mohnish Sharma Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr.Ashok Gupta Advocate for respondent No.3. * * * Nirmaljit Kaur, J.(Oral) Reply on behalf of respondent No.3 has been filed in Court and the same is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he restricts his prayer only for counting the work charge period for grant of pension and pensionary benefits on the basis of last pay drawn by the petitioners in the pay-scale of Bhakra Beas Management Board. It has further been contended that the said relief prayed for is squarely covered in a judgment rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Raja Ram Malik etc. vs. HVPN Ltd. Etc. decided on 25.03.2008 in C.W.P. No.17956 of 2006. Learned counsel for the respondents although does not dispute that the said issue has been settled by the above-mentioned judgment, contends that the petitioners have not filed any representation and in fact, they had retired way back in 2001. As such, they are not entitled for the relief on account of delay. Civil Writ Petition No.22120 of 2010 2 Heard. The relief sought herein is for counting the work charge service towards pensionary benefits. The said benefit prayed for is a recurring loss. As such, the question of delay and latches does not arise. In view of the admitted petition that the said issue is squarely covered by the ration of the judgment rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in Raja Ram Malik etc. vs. HVPN Ltd. Etc.(supra), the present petition is allowed in the same terms. (Nirmaljit Kaur) 15th July, 2011. Judge Seema-II