IN' ‘rHE HIGH COURT OF cHHTTISGARH AT -. BILASPUR i WRIT PETITION (s) No. é gré _ oF 2009 ~ pETITIONER ' : . s. BAGHEL, ‘ f AGED — 54 YEARS, SON 0F, Sim CHHA‘ITAR SIGH Smw$ Ewch WORKING As — SUB — ENGI. AT - JAN ‘AD PANCHAYAT/“GURUR, DISTRICT;— DURG (c. G.) u R/O GURUR, DISTT. — DURG (c. G.) VERsus RESPONDENTS : i 1. STATE OE CHHATTISGARH, 1 ' ‘ THROUGH — THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PANCYAT &: RURAL DEVELOPMEN MANTRALAYA, D. K. s'. ' . HAwAN, RAIPUR. I 2. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, THROUGH — THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES, MANTRALAYA / D. K. s. BHAWAN, RAIPUR e 3. CHHATTISGARH RURAL ROAD; DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, THROUGH — THE CHIEF ' E EXECUTIVE OFFICER, L CIVIL LINES, RAIPUR C. G. t PetitiO’n UndeEArticle — 226'Of the Constitution of India FAG E I, HA T i HIGH COE IRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIT ,ASPUR WRIT FETETION (S) No. 386 of 2Q§9 ' I , WT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 0g? "IT-E CONSTITUHON OF INDIA SB: Hml’hle Shri Satish iK. Agnihntri, J. Present: Shri Aman Kesharwani, Advécate for the petitioner Shri S.K.Mishra, Panei Lawyier far the State/respon3ents. 0 R 1) E R {Passed of; 19‘}; day 6f Sépiemher, 2G} 1) 1. Lsamed counsel appearing for the State/respondents $ubmits that the pétitioner has alrsady continueé at the original place of paging for more than 2 1/2 years on account of iniexim onier granted by this Com on 22.01.2009. Ths State may he. gramed libelty to pass apgropriate orders keeping in View public interest and administrative exigency. Shn -Mishra flmher submits flm the Statefreszpondems shall not 1mm upon compliance oftho imyugn‘ed order’daieo 9 1 . 1G.2008 (Annemre P/ 1) in re$pect ofthe petiticmer, 2. At thm stage, when no offoct could be4 given to the impugned order dated 013621308 (Armexure 1’/1) on amouni of the interim orcler (lated 22.01.2009, thug it is not necessary to go into legality and validity ofthe aforestated impugned order. 3)‘ the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. l In View of the above: according to learned counsel appearing for 4. Accordingly, the petition stands dieposed of: No order asto costs, . Sty; K' Agnihotri f \\ID Judge Satish PETITIONER : DSBag‘luel, i VERs1 m: RESPONDENTS ' : State ofqlhhaitisgarh & Others: