1 pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 843 OF 2010 Raju Kacharu Adangle .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 844 OF 2010 Sachin Nagnath Satpute .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1013 OF 2010 Jankiram Bhagwanrao Jamkade .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1014 OF 2010 Sheru Shabir Shaik .. Petitioner Vs. 2 The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1015 OF 2010 Mishkin Khan Karim Khan .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. Arfan Sait, appointed Advocate for petitioner in Cri.W.P. No. 844/10. Mrs. M.M. Deshmukh, APP for State in Cri.W.P. No. 844/10. Mr. Shyam Mehta, appointed Advocate for petitioner in Cri.W.P. No. 1013/10. Mr. D.P. Adsule, APP for State in Cri.W.P.Nos. 843 and 1013/10. Ms. Sonia Miskin, appointed Advocate for petitioner in Cri.W.P. No. 1014/10. Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for State in Cri.W.P. No. 1014/10. Mr. Murtaza M. Nazmi, appointed Advocate for petitioner in Cri.W.P. Nos. 843 and 1015/10. Mrs. P.P. Shinde, APP for State in Cri.W.P. No. 1015/10. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. JULY 06, 2010. P.C. The impugned order in the above petitions is an appealable order and the appeal would lie to the State Government. We direct the appellate authority in the Ministry of Home, Government of Maharashtra to treat the 3 petitioners’ application filed before this court as an appeal and decide the same on its own merits as expeditiously as possible but preferably within eight weeks from today. The petitions stand disposed accordingly. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)