IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-9256 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.03.2011 Jagwanti .... Petitioner Versus Jagmohan Raj Sharma ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present : Mr. N.C. Kinra, Advocate for the petitioner 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? RITU BAHRI J. (ORAL) Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 24.2.2011 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Rohtak whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner against the order dated 17.2.2010 has been dismissed. Brief facts of the present case are that petitioner is a widow aged about 80 years and seeking maintenance from son which has been declined on the ground that she is getting pension of ` 5182/- and also having the sale proceeds to the tune of ` 5,00,000/- from the house she had sold. In view of the factual position that she is not held to be entitled for maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. Counsel for the petitioner has not been able to dispute the factual position for dismissing the application of the petitioner. The petition is disposed of by giving direction to the trial Court to send the matter to Mediation Centre so that the dispute can be amicably settled as it relates to family property. (RITU BAHRI) 28.03.2011 JUDGE reena