IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3009 of 2010 1.KAILASH YADAV 2. Tanuk Yadav, both are resident of village Rampur, P.S. Sour Bazar, Dist. Saharsa ….Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 8.4.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with complaint Case No. 215C/99 in which cognizance has been taken under sections 302, 328, 343 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that original case filed by the informant/complainant vide annexure-6 was thoroughly investigated by the police and on close of investigation police submitted a final report showing the entire accusation to be false vide annexure-2. Protest petition filed by the complainant was treated as a complaint and after holding inquiry under section 202 Cr.P.C. cognizance has been taken in that case, which was subject matter of challenge before this Court in a quashing proceeding. The order taking cognizance was quashed by this court and the matter was remitted back to the court below, where after cognizance has been taken afresh. In the aforesaid back ground and in view of the fact that original FIR/complaint petition filed by the complainant was found to be false on investigation, let the above named petitioners - 2 - in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Saharsa in the above noted case, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) M.Rahman