IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1233 of 2008 SHARAD SINGH Versus RUKMINI DEVI & ORS ----------- 2. 30.9.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court, in the facts of this cases the impugned order appointing Pleading Commissioner in purported exercise of power under Order 26 Rule 9 C.P.C. would not require any interference by this Court. Such exercise of a discretionary power by the court below infact cannot be lightly interfered by the High Court under section 115 C.P.C. specially when this Court would find no jurisdictional error in the impugned order. That being so, this application is wholly misconceived and is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/