IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 30TH JUNE 2011 / 9TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 12718 of 2007(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. JOLLY GEORGE, W/O T.C.GEORGE, THANNICKAL, KOTTAYAM-10. 2. SUNNY GEORGE, S/O T.C.GEORGE, THANNICKAL, KOTTAYAM-10. BY ADV. SRI.K.SASIKUMAR SRI.SURIN GEORGE IPE RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. KOTTAYAM MUNICIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KOTTAYAM. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM. 3. TAHSILDAR, KOTTAYAM TALUK, KOTTAYAM. ADV. SRI.SIBY MATHEW SRI.A.A.MOHAMMED NAZIR GOVT.PLEADER SMT.SUDHADEVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.12718/07 APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS EXT.P1: A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DT 19.11.2004 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P2: A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P3: A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DT 23.12.2004 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR RECEIVING THE RECORDS. EXT.P4: A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DT 9.6.05 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN THE NAME OF THE 2ND PETITIONER. EXT.P5: A TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT DEED DT 16.6.05 WITH THE ACCEPTANCE ENDORSEMENT OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P6: A TRUE COPY OF THE VALUATION REPORT DT 26.7.05 SUBMITTED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VIJAYAPURAM TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P7: A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT 6.9.05 SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P8: A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DT 6.9.05 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND PETITIONER. EXTS OF R1 EXT.R1(a): TRUE COPY OF RESOLUTION NO.14 TAKEN BY THE KOTTAYAM MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ON 7.6.05. EXT.R1(b): TRUE COPY OF VALUATION CERTIFICATE DT 1.9.05 ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM. EXT.R1(c): TRUE COPY OF RESOLUTION DT 21.11.05 PASSED BY THE KOTTAYAM MUNICIPAL COUNCIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 12718 OF 2007 (L) ===================== Dated this the 30th day of June, 2011 J U D G M E N T Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp