IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1993 OF 2008 Jagdish Wanjari ..vs.. N.I.T. & anor =================================== CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE: 6.10.2008 Heard Advocate Bhamburkar for petitioner and Advocate Chhabra for respondents. The District Judge-3, Nagpur has rejected prayer for temporary injunction during the pendency of R.C.A. 41/2008 before it. Grievance of petitioner/ plaintiff is that he was required to file suit because his structure was sought to be demolished by labeling it as unauthorized inspite of the fact that his application for its regularization filed under provisions of Gunthewari Act is still pending. Advocate Chhabra does not dispute pendency of said application and he states that application under Gunthewari Act can not be decided, as civil litigation is pending. In these circumstances, I find that ends of justice can be met with by directing both parties to maintain status-quo as on today and by directing proceeding in R.C.A.No.41/2008 to be expedited. Petitioner/ plaintiff to file private paper book in R.C.A.41/2008 by 30.11.2008. Lower appellate court shall then decide the appeal on merits as early as possible and in any case by 30.6.2009, till then direction to maintain status-quo shall remain in force. However, if paper book is not filed as mentioned above or if the court below finds that appellant is not cooperating in expeditious disposal of the matter, the interim order shall stand vacated. JUDGE smp.