Single Bench IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAT’I‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR Dharam Singh Bhatti, aged about 50 years, working as Revenue Inspector Land Record Mining, 4 Lm Section, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur, /, (1) State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretary, Revenue 8a Disaster Management Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Rajpur (C.G.) (2) (birector, Revenue Department, Raipur(C.G.) x, (3) Commissioner, O/o. Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.) K. (4) Collector, Land Record, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) TICLE 226 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA N wk RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER AR (CHHATTISGARH) w.P.(S)No. Y0” [2011 / PETITIONER : Diljeet Singh Bhatti, S/o. Shri , :%&$n§w. 4“ Ié’vI R o o! R/o. L/8, Vinoba Mandir Road, Nagar, Bilaspur Gayatri (C.G.) ”g $‘o e§ {LL \. w‘ (C.G.) V E R S U S HIGH COI JRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT RH ,ASPI IR RESPONDENTS : State ofChhamsgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICI .F‘, 226 OF THE CONSTITI JTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’hle Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitionet Shri V.V.S. Moorlhy, Deputy Advocate General for ’Lhe State/respondents. Shri S.P. Navratna, Dy. Commissioner (R), Bilaspur, is present. ORDER ORAL) (Passed on 06 day of September, 201 1) 1. At the very outset, Shri Moorthy, leamed counsel appearing for the State/respondents, on instructions, submits that the order dated 12.08.2011 (Annexure P/ 1) impugled herein, has not. been passed by a competent authority in accordance with Rule 20, Part 11, of the Madhya Pradesh/Chhattisgarh Land Record Manual, thus, the same is unsustainable in law ahét $h <hall not be given effect to. 2. In View of the above submission made by learned State counsel, according to learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication at this stage. w . Accordingly, the impugied order dated 12.08.2011 (Annexure P/l) is quashed. However, liberty is reserved to the State/respondents to pass appropriate order, if so advised, in accordance with law, in administrative exigency and in public interest. 4. The writ petition is allowed. No order asto costs Sal: Simsh K- A?“ Judge MM Kw v. 0t" l WRIT PETITION (S) No. 5011 of2011 “g3” PETITIONER : Diljeet. singh Bham. VER SI IS