Civil Revision No. 4885 of 2009 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 4885 of 2009 Date of Decision: 28.8.2009 Phulla Ram ......Petiitoner Versus Smt. Brahmi .......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri Pritam Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral). The challenge in the present revision petition is to the order passed by the learned trial Court on 22.8.2009, whereby an application filed by the defendant-petitioner to direct the plaintiff to give her thumb impressions and fingerprints for comparison with her thumb impressions on disputed documents, has been dismissed. It has been found by the learned trial Court that sufficient number of thumb impressions of the plaintiff are available on the Court record and, thus, such impressions can form reasonable basis for comparison with her thumb impressions on the disputed documents. The learned trial Court has further noticed that the defendant has not disputed thumb impressions on the documents available on record. Civil Revision No. 4885 of 2009 (2) The impugned order passed by the learned trial Court cannot be said to be suffering from any patent illegality or irregularity, which may warrant interference by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. Hence, the present revision petition is dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 28-08-2009 ds