£$ Hmucoum on cunm'rmmn nx-LAsmm mam No. 5800 o: 2007 PETITIONER Santosh Singh, Raj, s/o Shri Rohit Ram Raj, aged about 37 ycats, Asst. Teacher, Govt. Pnmary School, Pachori, Block Bamhnidih, Distt.“ Janjg‘r Champa (C.G) Velsus State Govt. of Chhattisgazly Thmugh: Secretary, Depamnent of Educau'on, D.K.S. Bhawan‘ Raipur (C.G.)‘ 2 District Education Omncr, DisttJanj§r Champa (C.G.)‘ 3 Block Education, Omcer,..Block -— Bamhnidih,’ Distt. Janjg‘r Champa- (6.6) (Writ Petition undo: Article 226 of. the Coutltutm‘of Indi’i)‘ ‘ Appearance: , Shri Anil Singh, Rajput; counsel tor the peu'tioner. ' Shn' A.S. Kachhawaha, Govt. Advocate, fox the. Stamon advance copy. om-onnm (20.09.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard on admission. Learned counsel for the petin'oner submits: thatchthe, petiu'oner has passed D.Ed. examination onhiaown expenses, therefom, he is entitled. to mceive two advance, inelements, according to cucuJaIs dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999. He also submits that in many identical matters, the petitions have been allowed in terms of the order. passedin the case of . Yashwant Kamar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corpotwnn, gm am! another £2006 Q m-CG 96}. He. suhmimithat the case of the peu’tioner is squamly. covemd by the said Judgnent. This legal position is, not disputed by the learned counsel. for the State. However, he submits that .the alder may he. passed in terms of the said judgment, butyit shah be subjected to vexihcation regarding petitionex’s such qualihcation. 2 W.P.(S)No. 5800/2007 £0 Accordingly, this writ pet'tion is allawed inhtmns of tha V order passed in case of Yashwant Kumar Bhwudwaj Vs. Municipal Cmpomtion, Durg) and another (Supra) subject to vermcation of the facts as to ‘whether the peu'tionnr, had,’ acquired D.Ed. ExaminationCeru’mate onhisown expensesas“ per cimulaxs dated 24.12.1998 and201.03.1999 and furthcr Whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. I costs. The . petition stands FmaHy disposed of. No order $ to \ Sd/— Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge