Criminal Revision No. 615 of 1998 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. 615 of 1998 Date of decision: April 23, 2008 Ranjit … Petitioner Versus Narender Singh and others … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Sudhir Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Nehra, Assistant Advocate General Haryana for the State. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. Admittedly, no State appeal has been filed against the acquittal of the respondents. A perusal of the judgment of the trial Court will show that the findings given by the trial Judge are probable, reasonable and are not perverse. Therefore, no interference is called for and the findings of the trial Judge are affirmed. It has been contended that it is a case of version and cross version and trial Judge committed a grave error in appreciating the cross version in the present case. I have gone through the judgment with the help of the counsel for the petitioner. I find that this argument is liable to be rejected. The argument has been raised that the version given by DW-1, Ajit Singh was deliberately delayed and the counter version of informant was ante-time. Another argument raised was that accused were the aggressors. When these two arguments have been raised they are to be appreciated. Ajit Singh has appeared as DW-1, therefore it was incumbent Criminal Revision No. 615 of 1998 2 upon the trial Judge to consider the version projected by DW-1, Ajit Singh and the injuries suffered by him, which were found in the testimony of DW- 2, Dr.A.K. Gupta. Therefore, no procedural irregularity or illegality has been committed by the Court below. Hence, in the present revision petition, no interference is called for and the same is dismissed. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE April 23, 2008 rps