IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 27453 of 2008 Between: Saraswathi Educational Society Sanjeevareddy Nagar Hyderabad Rep.by its Secretary Sri M.Surayanarana Raju ..... PETITIONER AND District Collector Renga Reddy District Hyderabad .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the to pass order in favour of the petitioner society for allotment of land Ac 9-03 guntas in S.No.16 of Gandipet (V) Rajendranagar (M) Ranga Reddy District pursuant to the report of the Mandal Revenue Officer Rajendra Nagar(M) dt 15-09- 2006 recommending allotment of land in favour of the petitioner for market value by declaring the inaction of the respondent in not passing order on the recommendation of the Mandal Revenue Officer is highly unjust and arbitrary. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR. C.RAMACHANDRA RAJU Counsel for the Respondent : GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 27453 of 2008 ORDER : This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not considering the representation of the petitioner society dated 22.10.2008 requesting allotment of the land in Sy.No.16 of Gandipet Village for expansion of their institutions. It is the case of the petitioner that in the year 2005 when the petitioner society made a request for allotment of the land on payment of market value, the Mandal Revenue Officer submitted a report dated 15.09.2006 to the District Collector recommending allotment of Ac.9.03 guntas of land situated in Sy.No.16 of Gandipet Village on payment of market value. Having regard to the said report, the petitioner contends that the inaction on the part of the respondent in making the allotment is arbitrary, illegal and unjustified. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. A copy of the report of the Mandal Revenue Officer, Rajendranagar Mandal, dated 15.09.2006 has also been placed before this Court by the petitioner society. In the circumstances, without expressing any opinion as to the entitlement of the petitioner for allotment of the land in question, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 22.10.2008, in the light of the report of the Mandal Revenue Officer, dated 15.09.2006, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J. Dt. 29.12.2008 gbs Note:- CC tomorrow. (B/O) gbs