IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 8714 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 20th September, 2010. Sonu Petitioner through Ms. Promila Nain, Advocate Versus Chief Administrator, Housing Board, Chandigarh & Ors. Respondents through Mr. Indresh Goel, Advocate, for respondents No.1. Mr. Amar Vivek, Advocate and Ms. Divya Suri, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The prayer in this petition is to direct the respondents to allot and give possession of a house to the petitioner under the 'Licensing of Tenements and Sites & Services in Chandigarh Scheme, 1979' in lieu of his House No. 373, Janata Colony, Sector 25, UT, Chandigarh. The petitioner's case is that though he is fully eligible for allotment of a house under the 1979 Scheme, his claim is not being considered in terms of the judgment of this Court in CWP No. 15133 of 2007 [Mohinder Singh v U.T., Chandigarh, decided on 16.09.2008. The petitioner is said to have served the respondents with a legal notice dated 31.08.2009 [Annexure P-5] and has also completed all other formalities required by the respondents. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the same by directing the Estate Officer, U.T., Chandigarh to take cognizance of the legal notice dated 31.08.2009 [Annexure P-5] and consider the claim of the petitioner as contained therein in the light of the decision of this Court in Mohinder Singh's case [supra]. Let the appropriate orders be passed within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is received. Disposed of. Dasti. September 20, 2010. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE