5a TH ON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) KY?” W. P (5) NO. /2011 ripal Sing Chouhan, Aged abouT 5.17....year's, S/o Shri Chandrika Sing Head Mae, oern P S h h str Gvnmef rimary School, Khakhani, KarTala, DisTr'icT— Korba (C.G.) VERSUS S’m’re of Chha’rfisgar‘ Through Secretary, Tibl Wefe Deprfmf ra lar aen .,. Bowa, ipr (.. h ominer Tribcd Welfre e Rai C..) Asian omissio sstt Cmner Trible elfar arrmen r .. RESPONDENTS : /,« x onf irec‘'o , un psion ilpu . Bloc li Offie k Educa‘’on cr Kar’rala, Ds’rric oa . il- Krb (C.6) WRIT PETI‘ITN UDER ARTICLE 226 'OF THE OSUI D 3mm 3m: IN E H 1 y h DKS hn Rau CG) Te Cmisso a Departmnf pur (G We Dep’’r Koba (CG) Ji Dlr, Treasury accots and en, Basr (6.6) R O N CNTITON OF INIA \% ‘ HIGH COURT OF CHHATI'ISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO 357 QF 2011 Petitioners ’ Sripal Singh Chouhan Versus Respondents étale of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J.» Present 3 Shri Basant Kaiwartya, Advocate for the petitioner. ‘ 'Shri N.N.Roy, Pane! Lawyer forthe State/ respondents. M ORDER (ORAL) S (Passed on this 21 “ day of January, 201 1) 1.> Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was initially appointed as Trainee Teacher in the year 1974 I on a fixed pay of Rs. 100 - 150l- for each year. After completion of probation period of two years, the petitioner was granted regular pay scale of Rs.169-300. Shri Kaiwartya, further submits that the issue involved in the case is asto whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale with effect from the date'of initial appointment or‘after‘ completion of.probation period. The issue involved, herein was considered by theIMadhya ‘Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal; Jabalpur jn 0.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. & others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers were entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initiai appointment. The matter was taken up to the Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Supreme Court upholding the _ decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/ Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from date of initial appointment. f \Q\ Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner aiso submits that this court, while considering the same issue in Amar Sai Ram & others v. State of Chhattisgarh & others [\NP. (S) No.4725l2006] by order dated 01‘092006, allowed the petitioner to make a representation within a period of ten days, raising all their grievances. 4. Accordingly, the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation raising all the grievances and in tum, the concerned respondent is directed to decide the representation, if any, in accordance with law and the aforestated decisions, on its own merits, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, subject to verification of the facts. ln view of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/—' Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ashok