1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 5186/2009 (Shekhar D. Rai VERSUS Vidarbha Cricket Association Recreation Club & another) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Neeraj Patil, counsel for the petitioner. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : DEC EMBER 4, 2009 . Heard Advocate Shri Neeraj Patil for the petitioner. By impugned order, Court has also framed preliminary issue about valuation of suit and its pecuniary jurisdiction. The framing of issue does not in any way show any finding to the prejudice of present petitioner by that Court and the contentions being raised before this Court by learned Advocate are, therefore, open for advancing before that Court at appropriate stage. Other grievance is that consideration of application at Exhibit 5 has been indefinitely postponed and though the petitioner has placed on record at least two pursises, the same have gone in vain. At this stage, I find it premature to observe anything in that respect or in this petition. The law expects 2 Courts to decide applications for temporary injunction expeditiously. In the circumstances, petitioner is at liberty to move this Court again if he finds that the consideration is being deliberately delayed. With these observations, the petition is disposed of. No costs. JUDGE APTE