IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE: 13-04-2009 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.23994 of 2004 Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd., Salem, Regional Office at Dharmapuri, Represented by its Managing Director. .. Petitioner. Versus 1.The State Transport Authority, Chepauk, Chennai-5. 2.The Karnataka State Transport Authority, Multi Storie Building, Vidhan Veedhi, Bangalore. 3.M.Ganeshan .. Respondents. Prayer: This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for a writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the 2nd respondent herein in respect of the proceedings of its meeting held on 24.7.2004, and pronounced on 29.7.2004, in Sl>No.535/Sub.No.03/2003, and the permit No.Psts.05/04-05, issued in consequence of the above proceedings in favour of the third respondent bearing Regn.No.TN29/C6363 plying on the route: BANGALORE TO DASANAPURA, so as it pertains to the operation lying in Tamilnadu and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ravibharathi For Respondents : Mr.V.Viswanathan (AGP)(R1) Mr.N.Gopalakrishnan (R3) O R D E R Heard the counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition it has been submitted by the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ parties concerned that the reliefs sought for by the petitioner, relating to grant of enclave permits by the Karnataka State Transport authorities, have been covered by an order of this Court, dated 5.11.2004, in a batch of writ petitions, in W.P.No.22332 of 2004 (Batch), which has been confirmed by a Division Bench of this Court, reported in R.Gajalakshmi & Others V. G.T.Venkatasamy Reddy and others (2005 Writ L.R. 167), which has been subsequently confirmed by an order of the Supreme Court, in Special leave to Appeal (Civil) No.11047-11048 of 2005, dated 13.5.2005. 3. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the petitioner, as well as the respondents, the writ petition stands allowed, in view of the earlier orders passed by this Court, as well as the Supreme Court, in so far as it relates to the overlapping of the area approved scheme in respect of Dharmapuri District. No costs. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar csh To 1.The State Transport Authority, Chepauk, Chennai-5. 2.The Karnataka State Transport Authority, Multi Storie Building, Vidhan Veedhi, Bangalore. 1 cc to Mr.N. Gopalakrishnan, Advocate, SR. 13635 Writ Petition No.23994 of 2004 BVN (CO) kk 28/4 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/