<x .^^' C^l^^ J^s'falE fflGH COURT OF JUMCATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION fS) N0. ^1°A6 /2006 s& <-' /Shyam Lal Sahu, S/o-Shri Malila-am Sahr, Aged about 45 years, Presently working as Assistant Gram Panchayaf Officer (Gram Sabayak); Gram Panchayat- Pandonagar, JanpadPancliayat-Surajpur, Distt. Surguja, Chhattisgarh. PETITIONER VERSUS "-State ofChhattisgarh, Through- Seeretar;^ Deptt. ofPanchayat & Rural Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226^227 OF THE GONSTITUTiON OF !ND!A FOR l.SSUANCE_QF APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTiORARl ETC. ^N XI-HC-22 3^'^iraRW, oTflti'is, Ridiyti< XI-HC-22 sn^r^r f^fRtsn^r gwNigf5(T 3^ •<ll<<IM'i|, ®Tf)ti'l$,istdltiy< 3T1^?T45|cb ^^^^M:^c:.LiO^ ^ Ri<>^, 3TI^TS?<TWHf5!T questio|ied respc|ndent Panch^yat: Janp|ad Shri Pankal Shrivastava. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. advance copy. Heard. By the instant writ petition of india, the petitioner has 30.06.2006, passed by the transferred from Gram Surajpur, District Surguja to Jashpur. The case of the petitioner i) Sahayak, Ciass-111 which js a (Bi maintained at the district level, another district namely, Jashpur| Therefore, being a district leve! been transferred to another district Learned counsel for the be allowed to make a detai highiighting the anomaiy created the respondent be dirscted to deit;i appearing forthe State/ respondejit Having heard learned the facts and cireumstances of counsel for the petitioner app^i Therefore, the petitioner is aii cdunsel for the petitioner. (^dvocate for the State/ respondent, on linder Article 226/227 of the Constitution the legality of his trnafer order dated whsreby the petitioner has been Madanpur, Janpad Panchayat: Panchayat: Manora, Ziia Panchayat: couitsel iowM ^rafesfmiTRCTr'^ tei^t-(ftTRR ^sri^Tsn^T ^ that he is working on the post of Gram listrict leve! post and the seniority is jwhereas the petitioer is transferred to whteh is going to affect his seniority. ioyee the petitioner ought not to have <l>n eifip p^titioner submits that the petitioner may id representation to the respondent account of the impugned transfer and :ide the same to which fearned counse! has no objection. for the parties and having regard to ^he case, ihe prayer made by learned tars to be just, fair and reasonabte. to make a detailed representation to (tf^y^) XI-HC-22 sn^T^T f^TR;3II^7T gitTR;Bl?(T ~\ .^ Soma ^ (SC 731 '<ll<<ld<1, ®-rfl+l'16,TqMWy ^^..^:.^:..^ ^ (^•b«^ a-n^r^nwTifer manner the respondent raising all his grie^ on account of the impugned tran^ writ petition within a period of resoondent is directed to decide from the date of its receipt, con^i petitioner in an objective meantime, tiil the representation 4 be relieved, if he has not already With the aforesaid directiod Consequently, M.(W.), P.| also stand disoosed of. Parties are entitied for certif 1/ances highlighting the anomaly created fer order, annexing a copy of the instant ten davs from todav and in turn, the Ithe same within a period of one month iidering all the grievances raised by the in accordance with law. In the the petitioner is decided, he should not Slieen relieved. |s, the writ petition stands disposed of. No.3125/2006 and i.A. No.7521/2006 'tillfit-'fl-l WRff if f&:S <RI^<;K °t;srf^IT 3I1^T ied copy of this order. Sd/-' L.C. Bhadoo JucLge (-fl%y^) 7