Crl. Misc. No. M-25529 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-25529 of 2010 Date of Decision: October 8, 2010 Chintu Kumar @ Nitesh Kumar ........Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .......Respondent ******* CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR Present: Mr. N.S. Dadwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, DAG, Punjab. Mr. D.R. Punia, Advocate, for the complainant. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.20, dated 5.6.2010, under Sections 363,366-A of Indian Penal Code (later on added offence Section 376 IPC), registered at Police Station Moti Nagar, District Ludhiana. Mr. K.S. Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, on instructions from ASI Ranjit Singh, has submitted that the statement of the prosecutrix was recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., wherein she had duly Crl. Misc. No. M-25529 of 2010 2 made a statement that she was married to the petitioner in the Mandir at Alwar. Prosecutrix had also made a statement on 11.6.2010 before the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Ludhiana that she did not wish to go with her parents. Bail to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ludhiana. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) October 8, 2010 JUDGE Anand