@ QET? $E W*3‘*€"F@ 1N THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. (£73m. C , géyL/mu Petitioners : l. Smt. Rajim Bai W/o Late Shri Biharilal Sahu, Aged about 62 y€ars 2. Amrit Lal Sahu, Aged about 6O years, S/o Keju Ram Sahu, 3. Lakhanlal Sahu, Aged about 58 yeats, S/o Late Keju Ram Sahu 4. Mohanlal Sahu; Aged about 55 years, S/ o Late Keju Ram Sahu Smt.Parvati Sahu, Aged about 38 years, W/o Late Harilal Sahu 6. Smt. Nandini Sahu, Aged about 4O years, W/o Late Basantlal Sahu, 7. Kishania‘. Sahu, Aged about 47 years, S/o Late Keju Ram Sahu 8. Suresh Kumar Sahu, Aged about 41 yeals, S/o Late Keju Ram Sahu 9. ‘Smt. Shashi Bai, Aged about 43 years, W/o Palu Ram Sahu D/o Late Keju Ram Sahu Petitioner no.1 to 5 & 8 are R/o Khamtarai, Raipur, 6‘85 7 are R/o Village Sejbaharfd‘g ' r R/o Village Fotiyadih, Tahsil 85 Distt. Dhamtaria (C.G.)\ Versus l Resgondents : l. State of Chhattisgarh, Through — Collector, Raipur—(C.G.) 2., The Sub Divisional Gfficer / Land Acquisition Officer, Raipur—(C‘G) 3. The Executive Engineer, Chhattisgarh Grih Nirman Mandal, Divieion No.2, Raipur-(C.G.) Shift Swami Thakur Sl’iri Ramchandra Ji Swamy Sarvarakar Mahant Laxmi Narayan Das S/o ' Guru Bihari Das, Through — preS€nt Sarvarakar R/o Purani Basti, Raipur, Distt. Raipur—(C.G.) MLbzm WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 257 OF THE CONSTITUTION A OF INDIA GH BJUR? C1? £HHATTISGIQRH : B£L§3xEtr§ii3 3M§3T ?ET§T§O§\§ {C3 NG. 8&8” Ga”: 2M”; PE?’§T§GNEF€§ E’m‘ §5<c§§m Ba? & Gathers Versus F§ES§C§ND£NTS Siaie of C%1ha§iisgarh & {3%he:“s {Wrii Pgiiiiaa uader AriEcie 226 0f ihe Carlstitu iora of iwdia) Singie Sgnch : Hw’wg Shr§ $aiis§a K. Rgnihoiri, J“. Fms‘eni :~ b‘mi Hammarz P§‘asad Ag aWaL giiVGcate fefwe petitbners. $3rari Shashark Thakur: i : xor the S'iaie. :3_ {35R e'! sn ihis 3"“ day sf November, 2G? ’§) {Pagg(l) s” GfEavance a? ihe geiiiieners §s ma? the §an€§ ih dEspute, wh§ch £3 %ikeiy i3 be acquired by ihe Land Acquisiiim Officer unéer me pmv§siom 0f me Land Acqu§si§iua A i; ?$§4 {f0}? $hon‘ “me Aci‘, 18§4f), is in dispuie - hefare t%1e C-Mi Cami %n‘re$peéi of We ofine §et§€ianera 2. Leamea’ Counsei fer the peiitiawrs whmiis “mat umii ihe disgme WEQ} regarc? i0 We is Ciecided. i‘ne iaarj shouiti i102 be acquired, as eves? muiaébz"; is m? campieie. Leamw ceunse] C’Qes mi questian ihe :egaiii‘g am va§§d§iy sf *e acqu%s§%isfi exse‘txi 091 ihe grauné iha? the wie m ihe mm in qaesibn 3s d§sg3uiab§a 3A 39 18* as §i may, ihe Alf €5§4 (ices 36% pmvitis amy consideraiioii Wiih regard ‘ia me iiiie sf the i-arad am‘ mat may §3e re%evani a‘or ihe pufpose 3‘ 33aymem ef samper'isa'iiom, mi far any athef purpose. The siage sf deiermmaiian (if ihe compemsa§0a has no: yet Game. Thus; sigbm§ss§0n of ihe peiiimaaers €hai i’ne praceeding shouid be siayed iiE! ‘he We suii m” the petiimners is deciéefj, is unsasiainabie m iaw. The procsedmgs may ga sn, as n0 Enmmi’ty has beam pcmted oui by the peiiiianers. However, wiéh regard to h§s iiile ior me pufpose of compensaiion, the peiiiionefe may awmach i‘ne campeiem c0ur§ for secision cw“ éhe case, es expedi‘iiaus’z‘y as possibie‘ if so edv§sed. m View sf fwegomg, were is no merii in %his §ei§€§on am? is hereby Sd/- Sau‘sh K; Agnihotri Judge 4‘ assnk - SE 3 e