CRM No. M 34780 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 34780 of 2009 Date of decision: 10.05.2011 Gurprit Singh alias Gopi ........ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: None for the petitioner Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab for the respondent State None for the complainant -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) On 09.12.2009, notice of motion was issued on the ground that the plea for quashment is based upon compounding. Thereafter, the matter was being adjourned for one date to another to enable the parties to place on record the affidavit of the complainant. On 01.12.2011, the following order was passed:- “No document has been filed in pursuance to the order dated 01.11.10. Last opportunity to do the needful is granted. Adjourned to 10.05.2011. It is, however, made clear that no further CRM No. M 34780 of 2009 2 adjournment shall be granted.” Today, no one is present on behalf of the petitioner and nor any affidavit of the complainant supporting the compromise, if any, has been filed. Obviously, the matter has not been compromised. Accordingly, the present petition, in which, notice of motion was issued only on account of the compromise, is dismissed. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 10.05.2011 mohan