c^ \-3~~t^7 B€^^tfs'f, IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Sl N0.^ ^ OF 2011 r PETITIONER: A^., ^.^^ ^.^-< •^•' RESPONDENTS: .\"\ Dr. (Smt.) Shaila Milton W/o Shri Philips George, Aged about 47 years, R/o Shiv-Ghat, New Sarkanda, Bilaspur (C.G.) / - Versys - State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Public Health and Family Welfare, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) /^2. Director, Health Services, Chhattisgarh, Directorate of Health Services, Raipur (C.G.) ^ 3. Chief Medical Officer,Family Welfare & Health Department, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT/WRITS. DIRECTIONS ETC.. IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OF LIKE NATURE sn^t^i ^icii an&^i ^qil'i ^fiTT 37 's^ -^WW^, afl1^<is, Iqcii'My 3TT^?T TR^? tlllCTI Shliqi fl 'ra^i" 200 31^1 •5^'IW'HfCT SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindija Mohan Shrivastava, J. 10.01.2011 Dr. N.K. Shukla, Si^ counsel for the petitioner. Shri Prasunn Bhadij advance copy. Heard on adraission. . The grievance of the that even fhough the petitii! voluntarily retirement on Health Services, Chhattisga the matter has remained pe the petitioner is that if she service, her application for as resignation from service ctil^'^'l Hl^(t?f ^ fs^ <Fn-^.K ^ 3Tf:gi[ sn^r Advocate with Smt. Rani Pathak, ri, Panel Lawyer for the State, on_ t3etitioner as setout in the petition is |iner had submitted an application for 2^th January, 2003 before the Director, ^h, and deposited one month's salaiy, jtding without any decision. Learned counsel for tl|ie petitioner submits that the case of bas not completed qualified period of roluntarily retirement may be treated It is the case of the petitioner that she resigned from service w^e.f. 27.11.1998. From memo dated 3q(:h April, 2010 (Annexure P-5) of the 1 Director, Healfh Serviccs, if is revealed fhat certain information with regard to the petitione'r's service have been called for from fhe Chief Medical 8s Health Officer, Bilaspur. Thus, it appears MXI-HC-22 snS^i^T R-ii.di sn^r sh^ictt yf^tr 'f Fkraveen 7°s[ -i<l'4ld'il, »Ti1<H'ls, f««-ll'My,< 3T(^T TR^T Wqc-IT (tiNT^) •M 200 l^i^ST' .aT^rwiWHfta 2-. that the matter of the peti before the Director, Health S In this view of the mat off the matter finally directii appropriate decision on petil As the representation time, it is expected that coj matter expeditiously. With the aforesaid c disposed off. cf)i^T<t^t'T •HlWf ^ fs^l <Fn^K ^aTfigqan^r tioner is still pending consideration lemces. :er, it would be appropriate to dispose ig the State/respondent No. 1 to take ioner s application. [ias remained pending for quite some ^icerned respondent shall decide the |3servations, the petition is finally Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge r^