IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AF BILASPURIC.G.) Criminal Misc. Petition No. c^<^ Of 2010 ^.-- rf PETITIONER: Radheshyam S/o. Laxman Prasad Jaiswal aged about 55 Years, R/o. Village- Pratapganj ^Targarh, Distt.- Raigarh ( C.G.) ^-^- ••"'-;k.V..'""' -.••<'\ V-- v^;&<^^-"". ...-••^'.^./••^* ^•^^^::' ^^.^^/ERSU£ ^n" % RESPONDENT: State of Chhattisgarh through District Magistrate Raigarh Distt.- Raigarh ( C.G.) PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF Cr. P.C. FOR APPROPRIATE DIRECTION REGARDING THE APPERANCE OF THE PETITIONER IN VIEW OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN Cr. A. N0.115/1992^ ?" StR 'i^y". HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BII.A8PUR HON'BLE MR. JU8TICB PRITINKBR DIWAKER Cr.M.P.NO. 656/2010 KadtiesrsvaiTi versus State of Chhattisgarh Shri Sunil Sahu, counsel for the petitioner, Shri Neerey Mehta, P.L. for the Stale. ?w-i:ir^ftT i?iaiFrtt??.^ <s.1[i?t<r<-T'T^¥'fy ASO g'^i?t ITS'EI-E??: f^is is iT' I"£Lrlla £^^1,^ U^ls^Cc-ff^. 0£,ir^/lISu?^ 1^3S^ ^ifjE:- A n.Kf <^-£!i.*r'.^. 'n Chalienge in the present petition fiied under Section 482 Gr.P.C. ;s to the order dated 5.8.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (FTCj Raiga;-h in M.Cr.C. No. unregistered/2010 by which the iearned Court below has directed for issuance ofwarrant. Conteniion of the counsel fbr the oetitioner is that uursuant to the order dated 11.3.2010 passed by this Court, instead of depositing the fine amourit of Rs. 3000 before the trial Court, the petitioner has directiv given the said amount to the comolsinant on 21.4.2010 vide Annexure A/3. He submits that even the comolainai-.t is wiiiing to &UDe&r befbre the trial Court and would deposit fche aniount received by him from the petitioner. In the aitemative, it is submitSed that if the comRlainant wiil not deoosit the amount befcre the trial Court the Detitioner would further deaosit Rs. 3000 befcre the trial Court. Considering the peculiar facts and circumst.ances of the case, in the larger interest of justice, iinpugned order dated 6.8.2010 passed by the Court beiaw is set aside. Within four weeks irom today, either the petitioner or the comolainant wouid deoosit the am.ount of Ss. 3000 before the trial Court and in turn the triai Court wiil issue aoorooriste receiat and aiter due verification of the facr. reniit ihe saifi amount in tavour cl tne comolainant. With the above obserTaxion, the petition stands disposed qf. ^^ ^^