CWP(T) No. 14184/2008 18.08.2011 Present: Mr. L. N. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R. M. Bisht, Dy. A. G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur, Dy. A.G for respondents No. 1 to 4 Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Advocate, for respondent No.6 Petitioner has prayed mainly for the following reliefs:- “(i) That the selection of the respondent no.6 to the post of PTA for GPS Kuthar in pursuant to the interview conducted on 12.10.2006 may kindly be quashed and set-aside. (ii) That the direction may also be issued to the respondents to consider the case of the applicant for appointment in place of the respondent no.6 or to hold fresh interview for the same.” 2. In the reply, respondents have explained the position with regard to selection and appointment of private respondent in the following terms: - “3. That in reply to this para it is submitted that as per the information as well as the proforma of marks supplied by the respondent No.3, i.e. Block Primary Education Officer, Dharampur, District Solan, the selection of the respondent No.6, Shri Kailash Chand, as Primary Assistant Teacher for Govt. Primary School, Kuthar has been made by the selection committee. It is further submitted that the selection committee has awarded the marks to the respondent No.6, for un-employment on the basis of the certificate issued by the Pradhan Gram Panchayat Bhojnagar, dated 25.9.2006. It is further submitted that the Pradhan Gram Panchayat Bhojnagar, was one of the member of the selection committee. As per the proforma of marks supplied by the respondent No.3, shows that the applicant has obtained 57.62 marks whereas, the respondent No.6 has obtained 60.25 marks. The abstract of proforma marks is reproduced as under:- Applicant: +2 marks (actual %age) B.A . P G Certificate/ Diploma one year course Widow/ Destitute women Unemployed Family Personal Interview Total 20.62 10 - 5 - 10 12 57.62 Respondent No.6 +2 marks (actual %age) B.A . PG Certificate/ Diploma one year course Widow/ Destitute women Unemployed Family Personal Interview Total 25.25 10 5 - - 10 10 60.25 Therefore, the present original application filed by the applicant deserves to be dismissed.” 3. Additionally, petitioner undisputedly stands appointed as a PTA. Hence, the petition does not merit interference and the same stands disposed of. August 18, 2011 ( Sanjay Karol ), (rana) Judge.