IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPLICATION 822 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION 822 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION 822 OF 2008 IN IN IN REVIEW PETITION (ST) No.5707 of 2008 REVIEW PETITION (ST) No.5707 of 2008 REVIEW PETITION (ST) No.5707 of 2008 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION No. 1395 of 2006 WRIT PETITION No. 1395 of 2006 WRIT PETITION No. 1395 of 2006 Mahadeo Krishna Bhoir & Ors .. Petitioners. Vs. Krishnabai Maya Bhoir & Ors ..Respondents. Mr Vishwasrao S. Deokar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr R.M. Patne, A.G.P. for the State/Respondent No.6. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 19.03.2008. DATED: 19.03.2008. DATED: 19.03.2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard. 2. Perused review petition. 3. The order dated 14.3.2006 is suffered by six petitioners i.e. Petitioner Nos. 1 to 6 in Writ Petition No. 1395 of 2006. The Review Petition has been filed only by the five Petitioners. Petitioner no.6 is not party to the Review Petition. In this view of the matter, the order dated 14.3.2006 cannot be reviewed at the instance of some of the Petitioners. If reviewed, it will give rise to two inconsistent orders in one lis. Faced with this difficulty, learned counsel for the Petitioners sought permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh substantive Petition. 4. Learned A.G.P. Mr. R. M. Patne, waives service for the Respondent No.6. The other respondents though served are not present. In this view of the matter, in the absence of contest, the petitioners are permitted to withdraw review petition with clarification that the order dated 14.3.2006 passed in Writ Petition No. 1395 of 2006 shall not come in the way of the Petitioners if they decide to file fresh substantive writ petition on the same cause of action. All questions are kept open. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)