IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 25TH MARCH 2008 / 5TH CHAITHRA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 1738 of 2007(S) ------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.14029/2006 Dated 08/08/2007 ...................................................... PETITIONER/ PETITIONER ------------------------------------- SANTHAKUMARI.T., W/O.LATE V.KESAVAN NAIR, AGED 62 YEARS, 7/955, KAMALALAYAM, VADUKAPALAYAM, SEKHARIPURAM, KALPATHY P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA RESPONDENTS/IST RESPONDENT IN WPC ------------------------------------------------------------ MADHUKAR GUPTHA, (AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME AFFAIRS, UNION OF INDIA, FREEDOM FIGHTERS DIVISION, LOK NAYAK BHAVAN, KHAN MARKET, NEW DELHI-110 003. BY ADV. SRI. JOBY CYRIAC - CGC THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ======================= C.O.C.No. 1738 of 2007-S in WP(C).No.14029 of 2006. ======================= Dated this the 25th day of March, 2008. J U D G M E N T This Contempt Case is filed alleging dis-obeyance of the directions in Annexure-A1 judgment. The respondent has filed an affidavit stating that it was decided to sanction pension to the petitioner with effect from 11.7.2002 on which date the application was received in the Ministry from State Government with their recommendation. Accordingly, sanction for grant of Samman pension to the petitioner has been issued vide Ministry of Home Affairs letter No.52/CC/1/2008-FFSZ dated 4.2.2008. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the petitioner is entitled to receive the arrears from 20.7.1991 which is the date, according to him, the application was received by the Central Government. In Annexure-A1 judgment this Court C.O.C.No. 1738 of 2007-S. -: 2 :- has upheld the claim of the petitioner for pension from the date on which the application was received. 3. Now there is a dispute regarding the date on which the application was received in the Ministry. It is upto the petitioner to file a representation before the Secretary to the Government, Ministry of Home Affairs pointing out the details to show that the application was received on 20.7.1991. With liberty to do so, this Contempt Case is closed. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE. kvs/-