THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.1623 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner filed O.S.No.36 of 2009 in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Kadapa, for recovery of certain amount. He has also filed I.A.No.2008 of 2009 under Order 38 Rule 5 C.P.C., for attachment of the schedule property. The trial Court issued notice to the respondent and on receipt of the same, he filed counter-affidavit. He stated that he entered into an agreement with another person, for sale of an item of schedule property. He further pleaded that, in addition to that he has three houses in Ambha Bhavani Nagar of Kadapa city and that he has no intention to part with the said properties. Taking the same into account, the trial Court dismissed the I.A., through order, dated 02.03.2010. The same is challenged in this C.R.P. Heard Sri V.R.Reddy Kovvuri, learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is under the assumption that the respondent does not have any other property, except the one mentioned in the schedule, and therefore, prayed for its attachment. The respondent received the notice and categorically stated that he intended to sell that property, so much so substantial amount was received towards consideration under the agreement of sale. It is further stated that he owns three houses in Ambha Bhavani Nagar of Kadapa city. The trial Court felt that the respondent is possessed of adequate means to satisfy the decree, in case it is passed in the suit. The petitioner did not file any rejoinder stating that the respondent does not hold any other properties. Therefore, no exception can be taken to the order under revision. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as costs. _____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.20.04.2010. GJ