( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13303 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 1527 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13304 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 1295 OF 2005 Mohammad Salahuddin s/o Bahuddin Kazi APPLICANT VERSUS Nasibabi w/o Rahimoddin Kazi and others RESPONDENTS ..... Smt. Anjali Dube-Bajpai, advocate for the applicant. Smt. A.N. Ansari, advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. R.R. Mantri, advocate for respondents No. 19A, 19C and 19D in the second appeal. ..... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 16th December, 2009] PER COURT : 1. Heard counsel. 2. The applicant seeks intervention on the ground that he has been declared mutawalli of the Trust. It is contended by the counsel for the respondents and Intervenors that the applicant has adverse interest and cannot represent the Trust. ( 2 ) 3. The question regarding mutawalliship of the applicant is subjudice. Subject to the decision of the mutawalliship of the applicant, the intervention of the applicant is allowed and though the applicant will not be treated as representative of the Trust, yet, the applicant may agitate the questions as may be permissible under the law. The applications are accordingly allowed. [ V.R. KINGAONKAR ] JUDGE NPJ/ca13303-09