-1- GPN-J-2459-ARHCBN-3-04-1,00,000-ALA4* [Spl.-H.C.,A.S.,C.D.79e. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. C.A.O.No.40/2009 IN M.C.A.ST.No.18164/2008 IN W.P.No.2952/2008 Laxmibai Shankarsingh Thakur - versus- Smt. Gangabai Asthana ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or Directions Court's or Judge's Orders. And Registrar's Orders. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JANUARY 29, 2009. Heard. Prayer is to condone delay of 20 days in filing M.C.A. for review of order dt. 29.09.2008. The order dt. 29.09.2008 shows that this Court has found that actually delay in proceeding before Adhoc District Judge in M.C.A.No.17/2007 was 543 days and delay explained was only of 453 days. In view of the reasons given by the Adhoc District Judge, Amravati, and after appreciating those reasons Writ Petition has been dismissed on merits, though in the absence of Advocate for petitioner then appearing. In these circumstances, I have heard Advocate Shri N.R. Saboo, on merits of the controversy also. In present application for review for -2- the first time some allegations are being made against the local Advocate. Those allegations ought to have appeared in Writ Petition which was filed before this Court by different Advocate. In the absence of those allegations the view taken by this court on 29.9.2008 does not require any re-consideration. As I am not satisfied that there is any ground being made out warranting exercise of review jurisdiction, application for condonation of delay is rejected. No cost. JUDGE Rgd.