1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Seventh day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.M.SUNDRESH CRL OP(MD) No.13034 of 2011 VANARAJ ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED -2 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SEITHUR POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. ( CRIME NO.221 OF 2011 ) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. G.THALAIMUTHARASU Advocate For Respondent : MR. A. RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 379 of I.P.C., in Crime No.221 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The Court heard the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent State. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has nothing to do with the alleged offence as stated in the complaint. 4.The petitioner was granted Anticipatory Bail by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.11873 of 2011, dated 09.09.2011 and as the petitioner was not able to execute the sureties and he did not surrendered and therefore, this application is filed. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5.It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) that this petitioner has already been granted Anticipatory Bail by this Court and the relief therein stands automatically cancelled upon the petitioner for not having complied with the condition. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the petitioner could not comply with the condition imposed by this Court as the petitioner's father name was wrongly mentioned in the said order and taking into consideration of the offence alleged, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rajapalayam, and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 7. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 27/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAJAPALAYAM 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SEITHUR POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to Mr.G.THALAIMUTHARASU ,Advocate, SR.No. 34241 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13034 of 2011 Date :27/09/2011 TR : 30.09.2011: 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/