IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH AUGUST 2010 / 13TH SRAVANA 1932 Crl.MC.No. 3097 of 2010() ------------------------------------- CRIME NO.458/2006 OF PALAKKAD TOWN NORTH POLICE STATION. .................... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.3 ------------------------------------------ IBRAHIM @ IMBAYI, S/O.HAMZA, AGED 38 YEARS, KURIKAPPULLI HOUSE, PUZHANKARA, PALLIPPURAM P.O., PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT/STATE AND COMPLAINANT -------------------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM (REPRESENTING THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TOWN NORTH POLICE STATION, IN CRIME NO.458/2006). BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR.C.S. HRITHWIK. THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: rs. V. RAMKUMAR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Crl.M.C..No.3097 of 200 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 4 th day of August, 2010 ORDER Petitioner, who is the 3rd accused in Crime No.458/2006 of Palakkad Town North Police Station for an offence punishable under Section 420 read with 34 IPC and now pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palakkad as C.C.No.115/2008 and transferred to Long Pending Register as L.P.No.81/2008 seeks to quash the proceedings against him mainly on the ground that co- accused in the case have been acquitted after trial in C.C.No.2/2008. In the light of the decision in Moosa Vs.Sub Inspector of Police ( 2006(1) KLT 552), it is not permissible for this Court to quash the proceedings against the petitioner without a trial mainly for the reason that the co-accused have been acquitted. I am, however, inclined to permit the petitioner to plead for a discharge in C.C.No.115/2008 and also highlight the fact of acquittal of the co-accused before the Magistrate. I am also inclined to permit the petitioner to plead for a discharge in absentia. Accordingly if the petitioner file an application for Crl. M.C. No. 3097 of 2010 2 discharge before the court below through his counsel, that court shall not insist on the personal appearance of the petitioner for the disposal of the discharge petition. It shall be open to the petitioner to highlight the fact that the co-accused in the case have been acquitted after trial. This Crl.M.C is disposed of reserving the above right of the petitioner. Dated this the 4th day of August, 2010. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE sj