:—78 ^5^ ^l^l^l^, ^^<H€i^f^^j^^ Cy) W^^tF^T^I^ ^ /-^/4: "f"-¥--^lQ^ ^n^T1?^ ( 3Ti^r^FT°^N5" "^^ ^^ 5b*tl<=F ^N^N ^?^fftft^ •(f^r< ^<3?^3?T^T Writ Petitioni rsinele Bench: Hon'ble nl PETITIONER Neelan) Narayaj RESC^ Vs RESPONDENTS 1. State o 2. 3. 4. CG Sl Catego]j Commij Raipur I Collectq Directoi Govern! (C)No. 1281 of 2009 r. Justice Dhirendra Mishral Sanjeev Rao, S/o Shri Neelam n Rao, Aged about 26 years, R/o )lony Bijapur, Dist. Bijapur (CG) Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Depart]|nent of Revenue, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawa^i, Raipur (CG) ^ate Commission of Backward ty, Through Secretary, CG State ssion of Backward Category, :(CG) )r, Bijapur, Dist. Bijapur (CG) r/Vice-President, Chhattisgarh ment Caste Scrutiny Committee, Dist. R^ipur (CG) 5. Deputyj 4.3.2009 Director, Chhattisgarh Government Caste Scrutiny Committee, Dist. R^ipur (CG) Ms. Deepali Pandey, c(punsel for the petitioner. Mr. Alok Bakshi, GA f({>r the State. Grieva.ice of the petitijoner is that he participated in the Patwari Examination, $008 and stood first in Other Backward Caste category iiji the whole district and stood 14 in General category. Tjhe petitioner was directed by '—78 '3^ ^ 1^M^, ^•^i^l41^ fa^ 1 <Hy 3:iT^T ^? I^NT ^^T 3,f^i -^qNT <nwiiwft®e> ^Ft2Qa ^n^r^^f i^Wt^^^lt^T 2 ^Rfef^? ^TWTf^fe^ iFt^R ^<3t^r^T^r the respondent No.S-Colle^tor, to produce duly verified caste certificate of Othei| Backward Caste (in short ftOBC??) along with other {testimonial on the date of counseling i.e. 24th Febru petitioner applied for verif: to the Chhattisgarh H Committee, Distt. Raipur, sary, 2008. Accordingly, the .cation of his caste certificate ;igh Level Caste Scrutiny ihereinafter referred to as "the Committee"), however, the|Committee refused to accept his application. Thereaftfer, the petitioner sent his application through registe|:ed post vide Annexure P/7 on 20.2.2009, however, he di{l not receive any notice from the respondent No.4 till ^4.2.2009, the date on which counseling was held. Thereafter, he approached respondent No.4 to sub|iiit another application for verification of his caste c^n 28.2.2009 (Annexure P/8), but respondent No.4 refusj these circumstances, thej ^d to accept the same. In the petitioner has prayed for direction to respondent N^).4 to decide his application and verify his caste certifijcate, and has also prayed for direction to respondent No. 3 to keep one post under OBC category vacant till final c^ecision on his application for verification of caste certification by respondent No.4. On the other handj, Mr. Alok Bakshi, learned counsel appearing for thje State/respondents submits asfl4iC-78 ^i^T^Tl^iN' ^^P 3-?i^¥l^:?NF rw"w^'tr: "S^F v^i^!^^, ^^<!<o, f^Fray HIN<8fr^»1tR^ '^200^ 3H^W<^%c:(yi(3<^^):i ^<?i^R^f^^ri^ that if the petitioner appea|-s before the Committee along with necessary evidence ii^ his possession to establish 2009, the Committee shall his caste on 16th March, decide his application f^r verification of his caste certificate expeditiously aft{er due enquiry in accordance with law. He further subjnits that respondent No. 3- Collector, Bijapur shall jkeep one post under OBC ^i^i^t4»i'W?^ ^* fe^ ^R^R ^T^tlw'sTr^r category vacant till res^ondent No.4/the Committee decides the application of the petitioner for verification of his caste certificate. In view of above subnlissions of learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner i^ directed to appear before the High Level Caste Scrutiny (^ommittee, Raipur/respondent No.4 on 16th March, 2009 his possession to establishj OBC category. On such apj)earance, the Committee shall decide his application f(pr verification of his caste certificate expeditiously j after holding enquiry in accordance with law. In the meanwhile, tfie Collector, Bijapur is also jalong with all the evidence in his status that he belongs to directed to keep one post against OBC category vacant till decision on the appljication of the petitioner for verification of his cast^ certificate by respondent No.4/the Committee. •^^•iw^^^^r^a^i^^^^i [-HC—78 ^T^i ^T f^fj-^ ^T^T ^H^T ^?*fich ^ NWI^' '3^1 '^FIR;R, ^xtlwt^/ f^^l-H^< NINCfl^TW^ •^200 3:F[^T'^%"( ^-- ^^?^^f^3?it^ ^ ^T^PfrT^R^ ^? fe^ ifal^K ^ ^RR ^T^? 01, application for interim With the aforesaid dir^ctions, the instant petition is disposed of. Consequently, IA No| relief also stands disposed (|)f. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge Kf^SWf.S^^.^S,^,,