'^L..-,:,..., •^^?;E?eiassS^^- RESPONDENT t'g^iS?3^^^Si^rlCS-'T'^^"'*"'* IGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 1647ofl9% : Sitaram Soni S/o Shri Banshi Rao, aged about 69 years, resident of village Kolika, Tata Lmes, Post Kohka, Distt. Durg (MP) VERSUS : Steel Authoritv of India, (Bhilai-Steel Plant), Bhilai, Distt. Durg, T^ou^i its Maiiagiiig Director. WRFT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF D-TOIA SB: Hon'ble Shn_Satish K. Agnlhotri, J. Present: Shri H.B.Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Shri Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate forthe petitioner. Shri N.K.Vyas, Advocate forthe respondent. ORALORDER (Passed on 23rd day of April, 2008) 1. Leamed counsel appearine for the respondent submits that pursuant to the order dated 19.03.2007, the petitioner has been paid C.P.F CContributorv Providenft Fund), SEWA and Gratiutv' amouat in full. The petitioner is not eiititled to encashment of LTC as the petitioner has not travelled duringthe said period and fiuther eamed leave is eacasiiable if the petitioner has actually worked. * 2. Leamed counsel appearing for fhe petitioner submits that fhe paynient made by the respondent is not to his satisfaction as there is discrepancy in calculation ofthe amount. 3. In view of the over-all settlement leamed counsel appearing for the pailies submit thatthe authorities wouid reconcile the amount as poiiited out bv the oetitioner. after affordine an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner to put forward his case, within a period of six weeks from tfae receipt ofcopy ofthe order. 4. In view of the foregoing, nothing surv'ives iii this matter and accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge