IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 8TH JULY 2011 / 17TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 18469 of 2011(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. LAKSHMY N., D/O.P.SEETHALAKSHMY, LAKSHMY VILAS, P.O.MULAMKUNNATHU KAVU, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680581. 2. VENKATESH P.P., S/O.P.D.PRAKASH, T.V.HOUSE, P.O.POONKUNNAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680001. BY ADV. SMT.DHANYA P.ASHOKAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673635. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673635. SC SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 18469 of 2011 APPENDIX EXHIBITS EXT.P1- TRUE COPIES OF MARK LISTS OF THE PETITIONERS FOR THE SIXTH SEMESTER B.TECH EXAMINATIONS EXT.P2- TRUE COPIES OF APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DATED 14.3.11 AND 8.3.11 BY THE PETITIONERS EXT.P3- TRUE COPY OF ADMISSION PROSPECTUS RECEIVED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER FOR THE POST GRADUATE COURSE UNDER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, MUMBAI EXT.P4- TRUE COPY OF RELEVANT PAGES OF INTIMATION RECEIVED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER FOR PROVISIONAL SELECTION TO POST GRADUATE COURSE FROM NUCLEAR POWER CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED (True Copy) P.A To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).18469/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 8th day of July, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners, who are the students of 8th semester B.Tech Degree course, failed in some papers in the 6th semester Examination held in February, 2011. They applied for revaluation as per Ext.P2 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider Ext.P2 application preferred by the petitioners for revaluation and finalize the proceedings by publishing the results, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within 'six weeks', from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, if the applications have been received and are otherwise in order. W.P.(C). 2 4.Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs