V S.B. (Service Matter! ¥ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ICHHATTISGARHI WRIT PETITION (S) No}\{3r{ /2009. Ajit Ekka, son of Mathiyas Ekka, aged about 49 years, posted as Upper Division Teacher at Middle School Bakarma, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. l. State ofChhattisgarh,Through Secretar, Education Department, .K.S.Bhawan, Rajpur, C.G. 2. District Education ocer District a Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 3. Bloc Eucation fficer Block k d O, Block Dharamjajgarh, District. aaccgw‘; Jashp Chattisgarh. 4. Joint rector, Aounts, Treasury and Pension, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. PETITIONER; u V€rSUS Resgondents / y D 7 m, («my , m h k Di cc MLRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ‘ )/\81 “MM HIGH COURT OF CHHATT15GARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION gSz’ N0.7432 OF 2009 Ajit Ekka VersUs Stats of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. PETiTlONER RESPONDENTS Present‘ :- Shri C.J.K. Rao, counsel for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduti, Pane! Lawyer for the State: (Passed an this 17 day of Decvemb'et, 2009) petition is heard finally. 2) By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to pay two advance increments from the date of passing of B.Ed. examination. on his own expenses, during his service period. V ORD R ORAL 1) V With theAconsent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the 3) Learned counselappearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the present case is no longer res integra as the same has been considered and decided by this Court in Yeshwent Kumar Bhamdwaj v. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another’ and Gopesh Kumar Verma v. The State Govt. of Chhath’sgam and another2 . Leamed counsel further submits that the insmnt petition is squarely covered by the decision as aforestated. Thus, the petitioner may be permitted to make a- representation to decide his case in the light of aforestated decision, subject to verihcation of the fact asto whether the petitioner has acquired B.Ed. certificate on his own expenses during the course of his service. 4) Learned counsei’appearing for the $tate submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with iaw and in the light of the decision of this Court in Yeshwant Kumar BharaaWaj and Gopesh Kumar Verma (supra), within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 5) ln view of foregoingraccording to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Gowri 6) Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. 1 Sdl— .h K.Ag“ sans Jmige V7 -hotri