IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH MARCH 2008 / 29TH PHALGUNA 1929 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 923 of 2008() ----------------------------- CRMA.232/2004 of ADDL.SESSIONS COURT, PARAVUR ST.3524/2000 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, PARAVUR .................... REVN. PETITIONER: ------------------ NIXON, S/O. RAPHAIL, PAYYAPPILLU, CHATHEDAM, THURUTHIPPURAM P.O. CHENDAMANGALAM VILLAGE, NORTH PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT BY ADV. SMT.JEENA JOSEPH RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. JIBU ALEX, PADAMATTUMMAL VEEDU, PUTHENVELIKKARA, NORTH PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM BY ADV. SRI.A.C.DEVY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. M.S. BREEZE THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-03-2008 , THE COURT ON 19/03/2008 PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ................................. Crl.R.P. No. 923 of 2008 .................................... Dated: 19-3-2008 ORDER The accused in S.T. No. 3524 of 2000 on the file of the J.F.C.M. North Paravur for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed against him concurrently by the courts below. 2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter. Crl.M.A. No. 2827 of 2008 has been filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 seeking permission to record the composition entered into between the revision petitioner and the complainant. The said petition has been signed by both the revision petitioner as well as the complainant and their respective counsels. In the light of this development, the aforementioned composition is recorded and it will have the effect of an acquittal of the revision petitioner within the meaning of Sec. 320 (8) Cr.P.C. This Crl. R.P. is disposed of as above. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) ani.