THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO 7th August 2009 CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3656 of 2009 Between: Syed Hassan Shameem, S/o.Syed Mohammad, 45 years, Business, R/o.9-1-51/2, Simla Tea Centre, 1st lane, Railpet, Guntur. …PETITIONER AND 1. Duggirala Venkata Jayadev, S/o.Late Kutumba Rao, 60 years, Landlord, R/o.9-2-4, Duggiralavari Street, Railpet, Guntur. And three others. …RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3656 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner-first defendant filed the present Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking to assail the order dated 30.04.2009 in I.A.No.276 of 2009 in O.S.No.61 of 2002 on the file of the II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur, rejecting the application filed to recall P.W.1 for cross examination. The only grievance of the petitioner in this revision is that even though his application to recall P.W.1 in I.A.No.276 of 2009 is dismissed, the application filed by the other side in I.A.No.309 of 2009 is allowed, which is also filed for recalling P.W.1. As a consequence of the order in I.A.No.309 of 2009, he is also entitled to participate and cross examine P.W.1. However, the petitioner apprehends that the order passed in I.A.No.276 of 2009 may come against him. Hence, the revision. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and on perusal of the material available on record, it is quite apparent that the Court below, while dismissing the application filed by the petitioner, allowed the one filed by the other side for the same relief. Therefore, it is needless to mention that as and when P.W.1 is recalled, the petitioner is entitled to cross examine him without being influenced by any of the observations made in I.A.No.276 of 2009. Subject to the above, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) 7th August 2009 Note: CC by three days B/O RRB