THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4243 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner filed O.S.No.66 of 2006 in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Markapur against the respondent for recovery of amount. The suit was decreed on 18.07.2008 and it is stated that the decree has become final. The petitioner filed E.P.No.76 of 2008 and prayed for attachment of two items of property under Rule 54 of Order 21 C.P.C. The respondent filed a counter- affidavit stating that she has no saleable interest in the said properties. She stated that she is conferred with the limited rights of life estate under a Will, dated 21.06.1990, and that she has no right to sell the properties. The petitioner pleaded that though the bequest under the Will is limited, the respondent had in fact sold certain items and the executing Court can attach the properties. The E.P. was dismissed on 31.05.2010. Hence, this revision. Heard Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarthy, learned counsel for the petitioner. It is not in dispute that the source of right of enjoyment for the respondent over the E.P. schedule property is a Will executed by her father. The recital in the Will discloses that she is conferred with the right to enjoy the property during her life time, with no right to alienate. In the teeth of such a clause, the petitioner cannot contend that the respondent had saleable interest over the property. Even if the contention of the petitioner that the respondent is selling certain items so bequeathed is true, it is a case where the sales become invalid if challenged, but not the terms of the Will get altered. The executing Court has taken the correct view of the matter and this Court is not inclined to interfere with the same. Hence, the civil revision petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:17.08.2011 kdl