IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1663 of 2007 JITWAHAN SINGH & ANR Versus RAM VILAS SINGH @ RAM BILASH SINGH ----------- 2. 18.9.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioners. In the opinion of this Court the impugned order refusing to send the disputed document for another opinion of a second handwriting expert is absolutely correct. The court below has noted that there is already one report of handwriting expert on record which in the opinion of this Court is sufficient. Counsel for the petitioners, however, would submit that such report is incomplete, inasmuch as there were two disputed thumb impression and the report of handwriting expert that has been brought on record is in respect of only one of them. If that be so, it would be always open for the petitioners to have their own report of handwriting expert, for proving their version. It is not necessary that the court must send disputed thumb impression for another opinion by another expert, as desired by the petitioner. 2 That being so, this Court would not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. This application is, accordingly, dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/