IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 13TH MAY 2011 / 23RD VAISAKHA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 3051 of 2011() ----------------------------------------- CRIME NO.276/2011 OF ERAVIPURAM POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT. ............... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED: ------------------------------------ 1. MISBABUDEEN, AGED 21 YEARS, THADAVILA VEEDU, KILIKOLLOOR, KALLUMTHAZHAM P.O., AYYATHIL, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. UNISE, S/O.SHIHABUDEEN, AGED 20 YEARS, THADAVILA VEEDU, KILIKOLLOOR, KALLUMTHAZHAM P.O., AYYATHIL, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 3. EYAS, S/O.SHIHABUDEEN, AGED 19 YEARS, PUTHEN VEEDU, KILIKOLLOOR, KALLUMTHAZHAM P.O., AYYATHIL, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 4. SIYAD, S/O.HYDROSE, AGED 20 YEARS, MUKKADATHEKKETHIL VEEDU, KALLUMTHAZHAM P.O., AYYATHIL, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 5. UNISE, S/O.ABDUL RASHID, AGED 20 YEARS, MUKKADAYIL HOUSE, KALLUMTHAZHAM P.O., AYYATHIL, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 6. SHAFI, S/O.JALALUDEEN, AGED 21 YEARS, KAYYALAKKAL HOUSE, KALLUMTHAZHAM P.O., AYYATHIL, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SYAM J SAM, SRI.B.DIPU SACH DEEV. Bail Appl..No. 3051 of 2011 RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERAVIPURAM POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT, 691 001. 2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-31. R1 & R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.MEERA K. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: rs N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J. ----------------------------------- B.A. No.3051 OF 2011 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of May, 2011 ORDER Petitioners are the accused in Crime No.276/2011 of Eravipuram Police Station. It was registered under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 506(ii), 308 r/w 149 Indian Penal Code and 27 of Arms Act. This application is for pre-arrest bail. 2. I have carefully examined the entire available records and particularly the allegations attributed against the accused. The nature and gravity of the offence, possibility of the accused to flee from justice and the likelihood of his indulging in commission of similar offences as alleged by the prosecution are also taken note of. Further, the allegation that the accused will terrorize or influence the witnesses and would tamper with the evidence and witnesses and would hamper with the smooth investigation has also been duly considered. In these circumstances, I am not inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to the accused. Hence the request for anticipatory bail is rejected. Petition is dismissed. N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE acd