F ^.3 B-S ^ '".-- ^te- K -3 ^- ^. -• d^ 1^7^ o ^ LN_THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATriSGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition fS) N0. /2010(S.B.) PETITIONER Shambhu Prasad Vishvakarma S/o Shri Vishnu Prasad Vishvakarma, Aged about 56 years, Office of the Forest Division Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT -o .<••. ... .^^ . '?^"/ t^>''' ^<y''^"" 't-" '&" .' 1) State of Chhattisgarh Though : The Secretary Department of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ^2) The Chief Conservator of Forest, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) 3) The Forest Conservator, Durg Circle Division Di-irg, District Durg (C.G.) ^ 4) The S.D.O. (Forest) Forest Division Kawardha District Kabirdham (C.G.) /5) Ramprasad Yadav occupation Deputy Forest Ranger, Kawardha Forest Circle, District Kabirdham (C.G.) ^ F M I @? ^. /6) Radheshyam Agrawal occupation Deputy Forest Ranger, Khairagarh Forest Circle, District Durg (C.G.) , 7) Ramanuj Patel occupation Deputy Forest Ranger, Rajnandgaon Forest Circle, District Rajnandgaon(C.G.) / 8) Chamru Ram Madharia occupation Deputy Forest Ranger, Khairagarh Forest Circle, District Rajanndgaon (C.G.) /'9) Kaiaal Narayan Sahu occupation Depuly Forest Ranger, Khairagarh Forest Circle, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ^-10) Khamhan Dadsena occupation Deputy Forest Ranger, Durg Forest Circle, District Durg (C.G.) ^ 11) Y. Ramchandra Rao occupation Deputy Forest Ranger, Khairagarh Forest Circle, District Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA d-°=l ":<i'41<rl<<, WTll^'ie, f3RTRiy ..^..(•>.LS2.N.o.-..^.^/2-lf3. ai^t^iiiFfw 'WT 3TT^T gn^ra S3 : HOK'ELE MR. JU8T1CE PRITtNKBR DIWAKBR 09.11.3.010 Shri Bharat Rajput, counsel Shri Vivek Sharma, P.L. for t' Grievance of the petitioner i for the cetitioner. |"ie State/resps- 1 fco 4. b the present oetition is that he is working as Forester and is due fo|r his promotion to the oost of Dy. Forest Ranger. According to the counsel for Ithe oetitioner, resoondents No. 5 to petitioner has been ignored for no already made representation date sarae has not been decided till dat iustice would be sen/ed i.f direction deciding his pending representatior] State counsei subinits thaj representation to the resp. No.2 accordance with law considering th Accordingly, the petitioner i; with the aforesaid iiberty. In 11, who are iunior to him have 'tjeen promoted but the case of the Ifault of his. He submits that he has jd 13.9.09 (annexure p.4) but the e. He further submits that ends ot s issued to the resoondent N0.2 for iet the oetitioner make a fresh ind the same wouicl be decidect in entitiement of the petitioner. t oen'nitted to withdraw the petition the eventuality of fiiing fresh representation by the petitioner witl'iin a period of three weeks trom the date of receiDt of copy of this orderi same would be decided by the ai| ueriod of three months in an objectl It is made ciear that this Ccj on merits of the case and the authl to resp. No.2, it is expected that the ^thority concerned within a further Ive manner. urt has not expressect any ooimon sritv concemed wouid be at iiberty to decide the representation strictiv in accordance with law, considering all the aspects of the c^se. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge