IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 4119 of 2008. Decided on: 22.09.2010. __________________________________________________________ Santosh Singh. … Petitioner. Versus Financial Commissioner-cum-Secretary (Finance) to the Govt. of H.P. and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Petitioner has already made a representation for the redressal of his grievance vide Annexure A-1 dated 7th April, 1997 to the Engineer-in-Chief. However, in the interest of justice, the same is directed to be considered as representation to the Principal Secretary (PW) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh. The Principal Secretary (PW) is directed to decide the representation, i.e. Annexure A-1 within a period of four weeks after the production of certified copy of this judgment by passing a speaking and detailed order. The petitioner shall also be heard in person and for that purpose separate notice shall be issued by the Principal Secretary to him. In case the representation is 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - decided in favour of the petitioner, he shall be entitled to all the consequential benefits. 2. Accordingly, in view of the observations made hereinabove, the petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. There shall be no order as to costs. Copy dasti. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. September 22, 2010. (sck).