1 S.B.CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.236/2009 (Hamira Ram & Anr Vs. Dr.Ravi Kumar Surpur) IN S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1924/2008 Date of Order : : 28.05.2009 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr.Rajesh Choudhary, for the petitioners. Mr.Sandeep Bhandawat, Govt.Counsel for the respondent. Reply to the contempt petition has been filed by the respondent. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the representation filed by the petitioner came to be decided by the respondent-District Collector, Jaisalmer. I have carefully gone through the reply filed by the respondents. By order dated 24th March, 2008, this Court permitted the petitioner to file a fresh representation along with the copy of the writ petition for redressal of their grievance before the respondent-Collector, Jaisalmer and respondent-Collector was directed to decide the same by a speaking order considering all the grounds raised by the petitioners. By a well reasoned order dated 20.5.2009 which runs as many as five pages, the respondent-Collector has 2 decided the representation filed by the petitioner. The delay in deciding the representation was on the part of the petitioner. Despite several notices, as stated in the reply, the petitioner failed to appear before the District Collector. Subsequently, he appeared on 15.10.2008 through his counsel and thereafter, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner before the District Collector sought adjournment for submitting documents. The representation filed by the petitioner could not be decided on account of Loksabha Election. However, the representation filed by the petitioner has now been decided. In my view, there is no deliberate or willful disobedience of the order of this Court. The contempt petition is dismissed. Notices are discharged. (H.R.PANWAR), J. NK