IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13353 of 2010 MD.FARUK @ MINTU S/O UJIT MIYAN, R/O VILLAGE SAHAR FARKA, P.S. SONO, DISTRICT-JAMUI. --PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. JUBEDA KHATTOON, D/O MD. IDRISH MIYA, VILL.- SAHARFARKA, P.S. SONO, DIST.-JAMUI --OPP.PARTY 7 26.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and learned counsel representing opposite party no.2. Petitioner is named accused in this case, being husband of the informant who was married with the petitioner in the year 2003. The couple is blessed with three children. There is some controversy between the parties who even reside separately but both the petitioner and opposite party no.2 now intend to resume their matrimonial life and reside with the petitioner. In the event of petitioner filing a petition before the court below expressing his intention to resume marital life with the informant and then court below shall permit the couple to do so and have regular watch for a reasonable period considering the chequered history at least for two years 2 and only after being satisfied with their conduct pass reasonable order in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, in Sono P.S. Case no. 82 of 2009, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad