IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF (3HHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G^) WRIT PETITION (S) N0. /2011 PETITIONER VERSUS KANWALSINGH, Age about 62 Years, S/o Shri Jaisingh, Retired as Permanent Gangman, R/o Village - Bhegipadar, Post - Kadekela, Tahsil - Mainpur, District-Raipur(C.G.) RESPONDENTS .-••" ^ ^•y.. ^•" ^'^/ 1. State of Chhatiisgarh, Through its Secretary, Department of Public Works, Mantralaya, D. K. S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Executive Engineer, P.W.D. Gariaband Sub divicion No.'S- (B&R), Gariaband, Dsitt - Raipur(C.G.) 3. Sub Divisional Officer (PWD) Gariaband Sub-division No. 2 (B&R), Gariband, Distt: Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UN DER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ^.^ ^^^ ^^ 1 ^ li —W J 311^1 ^iT h-l w sn^i wiw -Deepli *IIN<II ^wr'sh 3^ -^nWi, ®Xll«'l<o,fn]diylj,< ..^£..£)^.afc^^. "^f 200 31I^T '^V ('pf^5!^1!) ywwHfta sii^i SB: Hon^bje Shn Manindra Mohart 13-05.2011 S*u Shri Yogesh Pandey, eounsel Shri Sushil Dubey, Governnn|ent copy. Learned counsel for the petiU|?ner to pension because the petitioner w^ permanent Gangman. He submits pension of one, who is a perman< decided in the case of M.A. Hakim (W.P.(S) Noi.4135/04), Sone Sai and Jhunia Bai v. State of C.G. an< counsel for the petitioner submits considered tc 9 claim of the petitionef Leamed state counsel submKs ciaim would be considered by the down by this Court in the case of Hjakim Bai (supra). In view of thesubmis|sions would be proper to direct respon^ petitioner for grant of pension, in a^< expeditiously. With the aforesaid observatiohs, |for ttie petttioner. tent Advocate for the State on advance eM<1^<(ll ^WV^ ^f fa^ <ffll^.l< ^TaifiiiTsn^t shnvasiava..>i. submits that the petitioner is entitled ks apppinted in a regular scate and was a t|iat the issue with regard to entitlement of (nt Gangman has b©enconsidered and |v. Stete of Madhya Pradesh and others v. State of C.G. (W.P.(s) No.3572/05 others (W.P.(S) No. 2884/09). Learned fiat the respondent authoritles have not in the iight ofthe aforesaid decision. that the case of the petitioner and his clsmpetent authority in the iight of law laid (supra), Sone Sai Sahu and Jhunia made by leamed State counsei, it ient No.2 to consictor ihe claim of the »4cordancewith law and decide the same , Uie petiUon is flnally disposed off. sd: -ahrii ^i"v"'w' 1