IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13844 of 2011 1.UDAY PRASAD@ UDAY KUMAR, SON OF RAM BRIKSH YADAV. 2. BIRENDRA YADAV @ BINDA KUMAR, SON OF RAJENDRA YADAV. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 25.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted under sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 323, 324, 337, 308 of the Indian Penal Code. As per allegations in the F.I.R., while the informant was engaged in construction of a wall accused persons mobbed the prosecution side and indiscriminately assaulted members of the family which caused injuries at least two female inmates. It is submitted that the allegations are general and omnibus. There is a counter version of the case lodged in the shape of F.I.R. lodged by petitioner No.1. It is next submitted that the injuries sustained by the female inmates are not compatible to the allegation as contained in the F.I.R. Be that as it may, this Court having regard to the allegations and the manner in which it was committed is not inclined to 2 privilege them with anticipatory bail. Let the petitioners surrender and pray for bail which shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law uninfluenced by the present order. The application is dismissed with above observation. Nitesh ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)