lli'!l:i :/T^^'^'BrtrWV'»'VTl,rtii'(>"B't.ai,;'U-U^-&~u"lA,''^^-^.'v*' a'ngla Bencj IN THE HIGH COUET OP CHHATTISQARH AT BIIASFUR f [ ^ %^ M. A. No.(<J J 2006 ^Dafendaiit No.3 -Versus - RESPONDENT : Claimant No. 1 RESPONDENT Claimant No.2 RE80DNENT ; Claitaant No.3 RBSPODNENT : Claunaut No.4 RESPONDENT : Claimant No.S ..•<rl/T > 4. 7.-^ kM(^ ?•••', ^••'(1 %••' ^yy KESPONDENT 6. Defendant No. 1 RE8POHDENT Defandant No.2 7. <^ The Orieutal Insi.irance Coiupany Ltcl., Bilaspur, through its Divisional Manager, Dnisional 0£Bce,Bflaspur (C.G.). Sbri Bhiuieshwer Suigh, 31 years, 8/ o Shri Bakshu 8mgh. Ku. Nameshwari Bai, 9 years, D/o BhuneshvFer Slagh. Aaiipa, 7 yeara, 8/ o Shn Bhunesbfrar Singh. Ku. Manisha, 5 years, D/o ShriBhuneshwer Siagh. Kii. Lallta, 3 years, D/o Shri Bhiuieshwer Singh. Respondeats No. 3 to 5 are minor, Through giiardian./respondeut No. 1 Bhuneshwer Siagh. AB foy caste Gond, R/ o ViIlage-i..Naka, Police Station- Marwahi, District- BUaspur (C.G.). Shri Pratap Siugh, S/ o Shri Jailal Gond, R/ o Dhanora, Police Station- Marwahi, Diatrict- BUaspur (C.G.). Shri Pooraa Siagh Marko, 8/ o Shri Manrakhaai Singfa, R/ o Silpahri, PoUce Station- Pendra, District- Bilaspur (C.G.). c ^ APPKAL ITBDBSt 8ECTIOH 173 OF TKB MOTOR •V^CLES ACT.1988. Piw K'.!!'-' XI-HC-78 ^f^IH; 'shW* *lt*IWI Sh*11<»> 3FE? •^wmi,wKww, Riciiuy ^.M..A..fc).H°.30^ u^ •/^ 200^ / 3ii^i Macn (Ii^3al^r) ^tiTW^ifersn^T 08-1i-2006 Shri Ali Asg<r, leamed c^ proceedirg. Leamed cowDsel for Insurance Company did not tead in support of its pleading tha* fated tractor trotley as gratuil itii<i[ci41-i iii<nTfffe^<Ri«t< ^i3t1^T3I)iRT wnsel for the appeUant. Heard on admission. The only point urged l^y learned couisel for the appetlant- Insurance Compony in this appe^il is that the right of recovery of the compensation cworded by the <[laims Tribunal wos erroneously granted to the insurer by the leorned|Motor- Accident Clalms Tribynd while 9rcntin9 relief in sid» pcra-2 df para-26 of the awcrd since no such question could be cgitated t|y the eppellant/insurer in •xecution the appellant does not dispute •thart' thc ony evidence before the Ckiims Trilxmal the deceased wos trwellin9 in the ill- |ous possenger at the time of accident and that the ilt-fated tractor tr^illey was insur'ed by the appelhmt at the tinieof accident. It was pointed out that the owner ond driver of the ill- fated tractor trotley were ex-^perte before the Claims Tribunat. The quantum of compensation cwart^ed by the Claims Tribunal was also not disputed by the learned coynwl jfor th^ appellant. In view of the above fact^and the l<n»thcri- the burdai of provii^ its pleadin9 that the deceased i^ias trwelliiy as 9ratuitous passenger in the ill-fated tractor trolley at t|ie time of the aceident >»assquarely on the insured, this appeal deser^es to be dismissed at the stoge of admission being devoid of any i^ePH. So far os the observation bf the leorned Motor Accident Claims TTribuwl in the award possed in sub pcro-- ] \^' IRJF' XI-HC-78 3ii^Fr%rR<i* WSf^^^W'h *IT*<CTT Sh*1|ch 3^ •<4i<iici<<, ai^llwiia, Ridiyyi ..y.-.-A./.^.ri?.?:0 200^ 3n^?rVI'SRK ('^•jft'tjs) s^nwHfersn^r 1_ 2 of Para-26 is concerned, it Is recovery of compensation froni in execution proceedings could aforesaid circumstances. In view of the obove Paret-26 of the impugned award i|i of the insurer/dppellant to Tribunal. With the above modM devoid of merit is disinissedat In view of the cbove, M I.A.No.3407/2006 for urgent h^ documents on record also stand C. C. as per rules. »i<<Fci<n'fwi?ff ff fs^6 <Rf+Ai< ^•sil^iTsn^r }»hollycontrory to law becoaise ri9ht of |+ie owner/driver of the trector ti'olley not be gronted to -the insurer in the f^cts ond circumstances, sub par<i-2 of i|s set oside while mointoining the liability a('isfy the c»»ardpassed by the Cldms fication in •the award, •this appeal bdn9 stage of admission. |l.(C.)P.Nk>.l8l3/2CX)6 for grant of stay, iarirgand I.A.No.3449/2006 for takirg flisposed of. satl the Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmuich Judge