CR No.1421 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CR No.1421 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 15.3.2010 Parkash ..Petitioner. Vs. Jagat Pal and others ..Respondents. CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present : Mr.S.S.Godara, Advocate for the petitioner. RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. Though in the revision petition, the petitioner has challenged orders (Annexures P-4, P-5, P-8 and P-9) yet during the course of hearing, he restricted his argument only to order (Annexure P-8) to contend that decree, which has been passed in favour of plaintiff/respondent No.1 should be confined to his share in total land measuring 540 kanals 18 marlas and should not be executed in respect of specific khasra numbers because the specific khasra numbers pertain to Nehri land whereas the total khewat of 540 kanals 18 marlas comprises of different varieties of land, namely, Nehri, Tal and Bhur etc. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the record. It is not disputed that the petitioner is the son of vendor Kurda Ram, who has since expired. It is also not in dispute that the decree of the trial Court has become final between the parties as no second appeal has CR No.1421 of 2010 (O&M) -2- been preferred by the judgment debtor. Insofar as the objection of the learned counsel for the petitioner is concerned, it is also misconceived because the learned Executing Court cannot go behind the decree and has to execute it as it is as the property defined in the khasra numbers, has been agreed to be sold by the judgment debtor (since deceased) to the plaintiff/respondent herein. Hence, I do not find any merit in the present revision petition and the same is hereby dismissed. (Rakesh Kumar Jain) 15.3.2010 Judge Meenu