BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRITPETITION (C)NO. -j-^^ / 2011 PETITIONER ...,^l'^sl- -^r"T^/ p.a. p^^-'-" ^.&a.»- RESPONDENTS Vishambhar Dayal, S/o. Shri Gajanand Agrawal, aged about 65 years, R/o. Lailunga, District Raigarh (C.G.) Yersys 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Nagar Panchayat, Lailunga, District - Raigarh, (C.G.) S.Collector, Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA8PUR (^' WRIT PETmON CC) No,'379 of2011 PETmONER RE8PONDENTS Vishambhar Daval. VER8US State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WEJT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shn Sattsh K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Sourabh Dangi, Advocate for Smt. Bulbul Agrawal, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer forthe State/respondent No. 1 and 3. Shri Amn Sao, Advocate for the respondent No. 2. QRDER (Passed on 07th day ofDecember, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the impugned notice dated 25.11.2011 (Amiexure P/l); for demolition of the alleged unauthorized constmction raised by the petitionen has been withdrawn by the respondent authorities. Thus, nothing sur^ives for adjudication and this petition hajs become infiuctuous. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for ofher side do not controvert fhe above submission. 3. Ia view of the above; the writ petition is dismissed as having become iiifructuous. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Amlt