1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Contempt Petition No. 195/2009 Manu Anil Kagliwar & ors. ..vs.. M/s. Research Associated Venture Laboratories & Industries (RAVLIN) thr. its Proprietor Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Mr. Khandewale, Advocate for petitioner. Coram: R. K. Deshpande, J. Date : March 15, 2010 1. Mr. Khandewale, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the complaint made in the instant contempt petition is in respect of criminal contempt as defined in Section 2 (c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Section 18 of the Contempt of Courts Act deals with hearing of cases of criminal contempt to be by Benches. It states that every case of criminal contempt under section 15 shall be heard and determined by a Bench of not less than two Judges. 2. In view of this, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he shall file additional set of paper book. Office to process the matter accordingly. J UDGE kahale