^mp p= ^Qtf SQ^M C^( e% IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fCHHATTISGARHt WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^sa^- pp 2006 PFnnQNER ^' ^jT ^-^>ix . ^a^^ <^" ,^..--" '!•• .^' ..••• .-V. K. Jain Son of Shri Heeralal Jain, aged about 42 years, Occupation Service, Presently working as Branch Manager, C.G. Warehousing Corporation Wadrafnagar, District Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Department of Warehousing Coporation, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). The Managing Director, C.G. Warehousing Corporation, Raipur (C.G.). ^- WRIT_PETITION UNDER ARTICLE-226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA RESPONDENTS > ^ -^s^ -y .os <A> ,t HI6H COURT OF CHHATTCS6ARH AT KU.A5PUR Writ Petition (s) No. 7082 of Z006 Petitioner VXJam Versus Re^wndents Stnte of Chhotttisgarh & anolher Singla Bench: Hon'ble <Ar. Justice Satlsh K. Agnihotri. Present: Shri R.K. Kesharwani, Advocate for the (wtWwier. .<. ^ OftDER (Passed on 20th Oay of December, 2006) The follotiwig order of the Court was passed by Scrtfeh K. Agnihotri. J. 1. Leamed counsel afyearing for the petitwner submits that the petitioner has not received any suspension order titl dntB and has been working and receiving •fhe salory etc. In the charge-sheet dateS 6.11.2006 (Armexure P/3), h- has becn stated that the petitioner was placed tider auspenswn. 2. Tlie petitioner has filed this writ petitwn seeking a direetion of -this Court- to quash -the charge-sheet dated 6.1t2006 on accwnt of Ihe fact that Ihe petitk>ner is not suspended. 3. There is no semblance of any legal right or other ri9ht to seek relief under Article 226 of the Consti-hition of India. This petition is vague, cryptic, frivolous and devoid of merit ond amounts to misuae of the judiciat process. : 4. The writ petition is accordingly dismiased as not maintainable wi'th cost qucntified to be Rs. 1000/- payable to Ihe Chhattisgarh High Court Le9al Services Committee, withh a period of two weeks from today. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge •4