IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION No.26048 of 1999 Between: 1 Union of India, Rep. by its General Manager, Rail Nilayam, S.C. Railway, Secunderabad-500 371. 2 The Chief Personnel Officer, Rail Nilayam, S.C.Railway, Secunderabad-500 371. 3 Controller of Stores, Rail Nilayam, S.C.Railway, Secunderabad-500 371. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 R.Srinivasulu, S/o.R.Narasimhulu, Group 'D' employee, S.C.Railway, Rail Nilayam, Secunderabad-500 371. 2 Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Ist Floor, "HACA" Bhavan Opp. Public Gardens. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order of direction to set aside the order of Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench in O.A.No.581 of 1997 dated:3.6.1999. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.R.S.MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent No.: . The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION No.26048 of 1999 ORDER: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Eswaraiah) This writ petition is filed challenging the order, dated 03- 09-1999 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, in O.A.No.581 of 1997, wherein the O.A. filed by the 1st respondent seeking to set aside the order, dated 03-12-1997, rejecting his application for regularization of his services as Typist and to declare the action of the 2nd respondent reverting him to the post of Peon as illegal and arbitrary, was allowed. The writ petition against the 1st respondent, who is the contesting respondent, is dismissed for default, vide order, dated 02-12-2004. Therefore, we are of the opinion that the writ petition is not maintainable and the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. The interim order granted on 22-06-2000 stands vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J _____________________ P.SWAROOP REDDY, J Date : 02-07-2009 Prv