Petitioners Piaintiff w l Respcndents Defendants HIGH CDURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BELASPUR 43 Writ Petttion {mt227} No.1 891 of 2011 Churaman, aged about 27 years, Sic Late Ishwarlal Sahu, Kumesh @ Umes'n aged abcut 20 years Slo Late lshwariai Sahu KuParvati @ Puja, aged abaut 13 years, D/o Late lshwarlal Sahu, being minor through her next friend Churaman S/o Late lshwrial Sahu, All Ric Viliage Patpar, Tahsii Dongargarh, DisttRajnandgaon Versus Rohan Lai aged about 26 years, Sic Premial Sahu Punabati aged about 65 yams. S/e Premlai Sahu, Both Agriculturist Rio \Jiiiage Pa€par, Tahsi! Dongargam, DisttRajnandgaon Devkuwar aged about 39 years S/o Goverdhan Sahu, Agricuiturist, Rio Vii!age Pinkapar, Tahsi! Chhuriya, DisttRajnandgaon Meena Bai, aged aboui 36 years. W/o Rajendra Sahu. Rajendra aged about 38 years, Sic Sudarshan Sahu, Both Agricufturist, R/o ViHage Shikaritola, Tahsi! Churiya DisttRajnandgaon Padma Bai, aged abcut 35 years, Sic Deenu Sahu Deenu, S/o Maugiram Sahu. Both Agriculturist, Viilage Dhudhwa Salha, Tahsil Dongargaon, DisttRajnandgaon. Savitri Bai, aged about 3D years, W/o Rikhiram Sahu, Agricuiturist, R/o Village Khusipar, Tahsit Dongargaon, DisttRajnandgaon Motim Bai aged about 28 years, w/o Annudas Sahu Annudas aged about 30 years. S/o Dubaluram Sahu, Both Agriculturist Rio Lalbahadur Nagar, Tahsii Dongargarh DisttRajnandgaon State of Chhattisgarh through its Coiiector, Rajnandgaon 1. U) 10. 11. QB (Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India) MLPaiag Kotecha, counsel for the petitioners. Mr.Abhishekh Sharma, counsel for respondents Nor‘i and 4 to 10. MLSanjeev Kumar Agrawal, Panel Lawyer for respondent No.1 1/State. (SB: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma, J.) ORDER (Passed on 18-7-201 1) 1. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia the petitioners have challenged the legality and propriety of the orders dated 4.9.2010 and 18.3.2011 passed by the Civil Judge Class-l, Dongargarh in Civil Suit No.39N2006, f whereby the Court below has dismissed the application fried on behalf of the petitioners for hearing ail the suits together, inter alia, jointiy triai of all four suits pending before the Court beiow. 2. During the course of arguments, learned counsel appearing for both the parties submit that four civil suits bearing Civil Suit Nos.39A/05, 34A/05. 24A/05 and 1N0? are pending before the Civil Judge Class—l. Dongargarh. Vide order dated 8.9.2009 District Judge Rajnandgaon in Transfer Petition Case M.J.C. 15/2009 has directed that ail the aforesaid suits be tried and decided by the same Judge together. 3. Considering the nature of suits, parties and the aforesaid order, it will be just to trl and decide all the four suits together. The Court below ls directed to tri and decide all four suits together. “4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge