1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7425 OF 2009 Suryakant Malkappa Banajgole .. Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.R.V.Bansode for the petitioner. Mr.R.M.Patne A.G.P. for the State. Coram : D.B. BHOSALE, J. Dated : 1ST SEPTEMBER, 2009 P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This writ petition is directed against the concurrent findings recorded by the authorities below cancelling the petitioner’s kerosene license for committing certain irregularities and illegalities while distributing kerosene to the card holders. All the three authorities after having considered the material on record have recorded a categoric finding to that effect. Mr.Bansode, learned counsel for the petitioner challenged the orders passed by the authorities below mainly on the ground that the Hon’ble Minister while disposing of the revision application did not follow the principles of natural justice. In other words, he submitted that the petitioner was not heard by the Hon’ble Minister while disposing of the revision 2 application. I have perused the order passed by the minister. It records that on 21st January, 2009, the petitioner and his advocate were present. In the petition, the petitioner has made a categoric statement that on 21st January, 2009, he also submitted written arguments. Nowhere in the petition, the petitioner has stated that he was not heard by the Minister on 21.1.2009. Even from perusal of the order it is clear that all contentions of the petitioner were dealt with by the revisional authority. Considering the findings of fact recorded by the authorities below, that the petitioner used to sell kerosene for higher rate than the rate fixed by the concerned authorities and the statements of the card holders recorded during the enquiry and considering that there is sufficient material on record to sustain those findings and considering extremely limited jurisdiction of this court to disturb the findings of fact this writ petition deserves to be dismissed. Order accordingly. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)