IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20875 of 2009 ABHIJEET KUMAR @ CHHOTU Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 17.08.2009 Heard both sides. Sole petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Section 392 of the Penal Code. F.I.R. was lodged against unknown. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is in custody since 05.04.2009, on the strength of confessional statement of co-accused Sikandar Yadav as well as alleged confessional statement of the petitioner. It is further submitted that there has been no recovery of any alleged looted article pursuant to the aforesaid confessional statement made by either the co-accused or the petitioner. Having regard to the submissions, this court is persuaded to extend the privilege of bail to the petitioner. Petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M.Patna in connection with Kotwali P.S.Case no. 120/09, subject to the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors shall be the own/close family member of the petitioner. 2 (ii) The petitioner shall personally report to the officer-in-charge of the Kotwali P.S. or any officer-in-charge of the said police station once in a month for a period of 05 months from the date of his release. In case of default in such reporting before the officer-in-charge, same shall be promptly reported to the trial court/court in seisin of the case whereafter it shall be open to the trial court to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner and secure his arrest in accordance with law. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)