PETITIONER; RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1 . 2‘ 3. <1 district Bilaspur (C. G.). HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W3. Art. 227 No. 3900 or 2010 Gsndlal aged 4O years, son of lats Shri Phakaixlal, residam of viliags Amagohag, tahsil Kota, clistrict Bilaspur (C.G.). {Proposed L.R.i ShiVSinghg aged 50 years, son of Hirasingh, Narendrasingh, aged 42 years, son of Hirasiugh, Devendrasingh, aged 4O years, son of Hirasingh, Surendrasingh, aged 35 years, son of Hirasingh, A11 residents of village Amagohan, tahsil Kota, district Bilaspur (C,G.). (Decree ~holders) Dipak Kumar Das, aged 50 years, son of‘ Dinesh Chandra, resident of Balkonagar, Korba (C.G.). Pradip Das, aged 38 years, son of Dinesh Chandra, resident of Manendragarh, district Sarguja (C.G.). Smt. Putul Das, aged 55 years, daughter of Dinesh Charrdra, resident of Pandunagar, Shahdoi (M. P.). Smt. Ujwal, aged 37 years, daughter of Dinesh Chandra, Smt. Kajal, aged 49 years, daughter of Dinesh Chandra, Both are residents of Kargiroad, Kata, Triveni Bai, aged 70 years, wife of 1te Hirasingh, resident of Village Amagoh‘an, tahsil Kota, district Biiaspur (C.G.). (Judgment-debtors) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSITTUTION OF INDIA. (SB :Hon’ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Shri Somnath Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. resent: — ORAL— ORDER (Passed on 29/07/2010) Order impugned dated 13/4/2010 passed by 4th Civii Judge Class-1, Bilaspur in execution case No. 14-A/2002 perused whereby learned Coult below has denied the objection of the petitioner relating to inapplicability of the provisions of Order 22 Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short ‘the Code’) in terms of Order 22 Rule 12 of the Code. Leamed counsel for the petitioner submits that Order 22 has no application 1:11 execution proceeding in terms of Order 22 Rule 12 of the Code. Admittedly Order 22 has no application in execution proceeding but still decree holder is competent to execute a decree against the legal representatives ofjudgment debtor in accordance with the Section 50 of the Code only on the ground of coding or miscoding the provisions the party can not be denied of their rights on the basis of their claim, I - do not find any scope of interference in terms of Under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Consequently, this petition is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. All interim applications are also dismissed. ‘/ Sd/— ‘ iLxn T.P.Sharma Judge No order as to costs.