ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3420 OF OF MOTION NO. 3420 OF OF MOTION NO. 3420 OF 2007 2007 2007 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO. 748 OF 2000 NO. 748 OF 2000 NO. 748 OF 2000 IN IN IN ARBITRATION ARBITRATION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 65 OF 2000 PETITION NO. 65 OF 2000 PETITION NO. 65 OF 2000 Union of India ...Appellant. Vs. M/s. R.K. Goel & Associates. ...Respondent. Mr. D.A. Dubey with Mr. Anil C. Singh for the appellant. Mr. Y. Jhon i/by Mr. S.R. Borulkar for respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 22ND NOVEMBER, 2007 : 22ND NOVEMBER, 2007 : 22ND NOVEMBER, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondent. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out to recall the order dated 25th June, 2007 whereby the appeal has been dismissed in default. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 2. Place the appeal on board for final hearing on 3rd December, 2007. ( 2 ) (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)