IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1070 of 2010. Prem Chand Sen S/O Kingsen, R/O Village Haripura Tehsil Bazpur, District Udham Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand. … Petitioner. Vs. 1. State of Uttarakhand, through Secretary Social Welfare Dehradun. 2. Uttaranchal Minority Welfare and Waqf Development Corporation through its Managing Director, Dehradun. 3. District Social Welfare Officer/District Manager Uttarakhand Minority Welfare and Waqf Development, District Udham Singh Nagar. 4. Tehsildar, Tehsil Bazpur, District Udham Singh Nagar.. …Respondents. Mr. Kishore Kumar, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. N.P.Shah, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents no. 1, 3 & 4. Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, Advocate, learned counsel for respondent no.2. Date July 02, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned recovery citation amounting to Rs. 5,87,426/- dated 27-4-2010 issued by respondent no.4 (contained as Annexure-1 to the petition). According to the petitioner, the petitioner applied for a loan under term loan scheme for purchase of transport vehicle (Mahindra Max) in the year 2006 and the respondent no. 2 sanctioned a loan of Rs. 4,80,000/-, in which term loan amount is Rs. 4,08,000/- as margin money and Rs. 48,000/- as share of the petitioner. It is alleged that the petitioner used to deposit the money from time to time. The respondent no. 3 served a notice upon the petitioner demanding amount of Rs. 4,44,458/- due against the petitioner. Ultimately, the impugned recovery citation was issued against the petitioner which gave rise to the present writ petition. 2 During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay the entire outstanding amount under the impugned recovery citation along with recovery charges in easy quarterly instalments. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 2 has submitted that the respondent no. 2 would have no objection if the entire outstanding amount under the recovery citation is deposited by the petitioner before the recovery officer in not more than four equal quarterly instalments. In the above facts and circumstances, the petitioner is directed to pay the entire outstanding amount under the recovery citation (Annexure-1 to the petition) in four equal quarterly instalments before the recovery officer-respondent no.4-Tehsildar Bazpur along with recovery charges. The first quarterly instalment shall be payable by the 1st day of Sepetember 2010 and the subsequent instalments shall fall due by the 1st day of the month after every three months thereafter. It is made clear that in case the petitioner commits default in payment of any of the instalments, as directed above, the respondents would be at liberty to recover the entire outstanding amount from the petitioner in lump-sum. Accordingly, the impugned recovery citation dated 27-4-2010 issued by the respondent no.4 (Annexure-1 to the petition) shall not be given effect to by the respondents. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. All pending applications stand disposed of. (B.S.Verma,J.) RCP