IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND NINE ONLY WRIT PETITION No.19781 of 2006 Between: Darshanam Narasimha … Petitioner And The Govt., of A.P., rep., by its Secretary, Legislative Affairs and Justice, Secretariat, Hyderabad & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri Vayu Sen for Sri J. Prabhakar This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.19781 of 2006 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in rejecting and requesting to send fresh panel of names for appointment of Additional Public Prosecutor for the Court of IV Additional District Judge- cum-II Fast Track Court, Nalgonda, as illegal and arbitrary and violtive of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and issue a consequential direction directing the respondents to appoint suitable person out of the panel forwarded earlier by the Honourable Principal District and Sessions Judge, Nalgonda and the third respondent herein.” At the hearing, Sri Vayu Sen representing Sri J.Prabhakar, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.24963 of 2006 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also dismissed as infructuous. _____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 18.06.2009 ES