HISH COURT OF CHHATTIS&WH AT BILASWR W.P. (SlNo. 1904 of 2007 Petitioners Versus Respondents 1. Surendra Ki.mw, S/o Shri Ranochar Roy, oged about 40 years, Assistant Teacher-, ©ovt. Primary School - Bhandcypora, Btock W/s) Bdkunthpur, Distt.- Koreo (C.6.) 2. Smt. Shanti Miry, W/o Shri R. Minj, cged obout 45 years, A^istmt Teocher, 6ovt. Primary School Modanpw, Bbck- North Boikunthpur- Distt. - Korea (C.S.) 3. Smt. Usha Kir<m Yadav, W/o. 5hrl Bharat' Lal Yadav, aged about 36 years, Assistant Teacher, 6ovt. 6'irVs Middle School Jnry9ir, Tdi. Jarygir t>istt. Janjgir Champa (C.6.) 1. State of Chhattisgorh Through:- The Secretary, Oepartment of Education, &.K.S. Bhowon, Raipur (C.©.) 2. t>irector, Public Instruction Chhottisgwh 6ovt. Roipur 3. District Eductrt'ion Officer, Oistt. - Koren-Baikunthpur- (C.6.) SB; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sattsh K. Agnihotri, J Present; Mr. A.S. Rqjput, Advocute for the petitioners. Ms. Oeepali Pandey, Panet La»yerfor Stote/respondents. OR&ER (Passed on this 30th t>oy of March, 2007) 1. The question of law invohyed herein ceto whether- the petitioners we entitled to regulw pay scole w.e.f. the date of initiol appointment or fnxn the date of completion of probation period. ^ 2. Learned cwmset appeoring for the petitioners as wiell as for the State/respondents jointty submit thcrt ttie facts and question of law involved the present writ petition <re the same «sto that of in W. P. (S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari ond others vs. Stote Sovernment of Chhattisgarh A others). which was altowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. 3. In view of the above-stated submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, •the writ petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Si^hash