IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37857 of 2010 SURESH SHARMA S/O LATE SHIVANAND SHARMA R/O VILLAGE- MAKSUSPUR, P.S.- KASIM BAZAR, DISTRICT- MUNGER ……………… Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …………. Opposite Party ----------- 2. 08.03.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 20.8.2010 passed by Additional Session Judge, F.T.C. IIIrd, Munger in Sessions Trial No. 1088/2008, by which he was rejected an application under Section 227 Cr.P.C. It has been submitted that even though the petitioner is named in the First Information Report as having been present at the place where recovery of arms was done but he has not been mentioned in Annexure no.2 which is the seizure list with regard to the said arms. Further submission is that the order of sanction also demonstrates non-application of mind since the arms which had been seized were not produced before him. Further submission is that the petitioner in fact was arrested from his house. He had filed an application before the court below for discharge under Section 227 Cr.P.C. without considering these materials the petitioner has not been discharged. Considering the arguments raised on behalf of the petitioner are purely factual in nature, which can only be adequately gone into at the stage of trial, I am not inclined to go into the matter. The application is dismissed. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )