IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18866 of 2011 DHARMATMA PRASAD AND MAHESH RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 16.06.2011. Heard. The allegation is that the petitioners had interpolated in the government records for adding up his name in the relevant entries regarding settlement of a particular land and thereafter forged the record for being benefited out of it. Thus, the case relates to committing forgery in respect of the government revenue records. While perusing the impugned order, this Court was simply aghast to find that in a case of such serious proportions the learned Sessions Judge, Bettiah was directing the court below to consider the prayer for bail if the petitioners were surrendering before it. If such directions are issued so frequently as is being observed done by the Sessions Judge, then no government records shall be safe and the number of forgeries and interpolations shall simply breed many times. The Sessions Judge is advised not to be as magnanimous as to pass as frequent directions to the court 2 below for admitting some one to anticipatory bail in such a serious case of forgery. As regards the prayer for bail, the same is dismissed for the above reasons. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha,J.)