pdp FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 9 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s Memoranda of Coram, orders appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders ------------------------------------------------------ Mrs. Trupti Sanghavi i/by Bhuta & Associates for appellant. Mr. Nilesh Bhole i/by Ms. Aarti Bhide for respondent. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & D.G. KARNIK, JJ. 16/01/2009. P.C.: . Heard the learned counsel for the appellant-husband, who has filed Petition No.A-549 of 2007 before the Family Court at Mumbai. In the said petition, respondent-wife had taken out an application at Exh.14 for interim maintenance as well as litigation expenses. The said application came to be allowed by the impugned order dated 17-5-2007 and the appellant has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.4000/- per month to the respondent-wife and Rs.10,000/- by way of litigation expenses. . Obviously the impugned order is an interlocutory order and, therefore, in view of the scheme of Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, this appeal is not maintainable. . The appeal is dismissed as such. All issues on merits are left open. (D.G. Karnik,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.)