IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 4152 of 2008. Decided on: 14.09.2010. __________________________________________________________ Sanjay Kumar. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. B.C. Negi, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Petitioner was appointed as daily wage Beldar. However, the case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that though he was appointed as Beldar, however, he has been discharging the duties of Clerk-cum-Typist with effect form 1.5.1987 till 18.9.1996. Mr. B.C. Negi, learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of the Court to Annexures A-2 and A-3 and the judgment passed by a Division Bench of this Court in CWP No.1646 of 1993, dated 27th July, 1995 whereby the similarly situate person, whose name appears at Sr. No.1 of Annexure A-2, dated 23rd July, 1993, has been held entitled to the rates of daily wage of the post of typist though he had been appointed as Store Attendant, but had been working as typist. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - 2. Consequently, the present petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner for payment of differences of salary/wages of the post of Clerk-cum-Typist on the basis of Annexures A-2, A-3 and A-4, within a period of two months after the date of production of certified coy of this judgment. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. September 14, 2010. (sck).