mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 383 of 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.206 OF 2009 Y. Kunjappan & Anr ... Applicants versus Chitralekha Tarachand Anandi & Anr ... Respondents ... Mr. Robert C. Sequeira for the applicant. Mr.Sureshkumar J. Panicker with Ms.Bhavika S. Kawle for respondent no.3. Ms.M.H. Mhatre APP for the State. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATED : 17th December 2009 P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned APP for the State and the learned counsel appearing for the proposed respondent no.3. 2. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment shall be carried out within two weeks. On such amendment being carried out, issue notice to the added respondents. (D.G. KARNIK,J.)