IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.264 of 2009 In (CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE 10650/2006) Mahabir Engineering Works a partnership firm appearing through its partner Umesh Poddar, S/o Purshottam Poddar, resident of Jhauganj, P.S.-Patna City, Town-Patna City, District- Patna ….. Appellant/Petitioner Versus 01. Bihar State Electricity Board appearing through its chairman, Bailey Road, P.S.- Kotwali, Town & District- Patna 02. The Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board, Bailey Road, P.S.- Kotwali, Town & District-Patna 03. The Financial Controller (Rev.) Bihar State Electricity Board, Bailey Road, P.S.- Kotwali, Town & District-Patna 04. The Electrical Executive Engineer Patna City Electric Supply Division Mittan Ghat, P.S.-Khajekalan, Town- Patna City, District-Patna 05. The Assistant Electrical Engineer )Rev.) Patna City Electric Supply Division, Mittan Ghat, P.S.- Khajekalan, Town-Patna City, District-Patna ….. Respondents/Respondents ---------------------------------- 06. 15.11.2011 The appellant in the present Appeal is aggrieved by the order dated 10.02.2009 passed by the learned Single Judge, wherein the learned Single Judge following the law laid down by this Court reported in 2003 (3) PLJR 552 (Pulak Enterprises & Others Versus Bihar State Electricity Board), has dismissed the writ application being covered by such judgment. The appellant has chosen to question the order of the Court dated 14.9.1999, but however it has been contended by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Board that under Section 2 42 (5) of Electricity Act, 2003 separate redressal Forum has been created and if the appellant is so aggrieved he may approach the said Forum. Such argument is supported by the judgment of the Apex Court reported in the case of 2008 AIR SCW 24. In view of the fact that a separate Forum for redressal of grievance of individual customers has been created under Section 42 (5) of the Act, we are of the opinion that liberty can be granted to the appellant to raise his grievance before the said Forum as has been held by the Apex Court in the judgment reported in 2008 AIR. SCW 24 (supra) and the said redressal Forum must consider all the objections which is raised in the present writ petition and decide the said representation which is to be filed by the appellant within a period of six months from the date of filing of such representation in accordance with law. With the above observation the L.P.A. stands disposed off. P.K. (T. Meena Kumari, J.) (Vikash Jain, J.)