IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND JULY 2008 / 11TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 17300 of 2008(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- SIVARAMAKRISHNAN, T.C.37/1670(2), FORT P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.D.KISHORE SMT.MEERA GOPINATH RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE OMBUDSMAN FOR LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 4. A.GIRIJA NARAYANAN, T.C.37/1670, KUTTIKKAD COMPOUND, PUNNACKA LANE, KOTTAKKAKOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.N.NANDAKUMARA MENON (SR.) FOR R1 & R2 SRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR FOR R1 & R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 17300 OF 2008 H ==================== Dated this the 2nd day of July, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner contends that Ext.P6 order was issued by the Ombudsman requiring the respondent Corporation to demolish and remove the allegedly unauthorised construction made by the petitioner. The grievance in this writ petition is that this order has been passed and is sought to be implemented at a time when Ext.P3 application submitted by the petitioner for regularisation of the alleged irregular construction is pending consideration of the 2nd respondent. 2. The case was adjourned with direction to the standing counsel to the Corporation to obtain instructions as to whether Ext.P3 application was pending. On instructions, it has been reported that the said application is pending. If that be so, I see no justification for implementing Ext.P6 until a decision is taken on Ext.P3 application made by the petitioner. 3. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing that the respondents 1 and 2 shall consider Ext.P3 and pass orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 8 weeks of production of a WPC 17300/08 :2 : copy of this judgment with notice to the petitioner and the 4th respondent. It is further directed that until orders are passed on Ext.P3 as above, further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P6 will be kept in abeyance. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment immediately before respondents 1 and 2 for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp