IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1188 of 2004 (M/B) Praveen Kumar S/o sri Ishwar Singh, R/o Village Matanat Nagar, Police Station Balani, District Baghpat (U.P.). ……….Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, 2. Senior Superintendent of Police, Dehradun. 3. Station House Officer, Police Station Dalanwal, Dehradun. 4. Vinod Kumar Carpenter, S/o Sri Bhagwat Prasad, R/o Villaege Ajabpur Kalan, Dehradun, Uttaranchal. ………...Respondents. Mr. Harwansh Singh, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Suhail A. Siddiqui, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. D.K. Shamra, Government Advocate for respondents Nos. 1 to 3. None for respondent No. 4. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Mr. Harwansh Singh, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Suhail A. Siddiqui, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. D.K. Shamra, Government Advocate for respondents Nos. 1 to 3. None for respondent No. 4. 2. Mr. D.K. Sharma, the learned Government Advocate for respondents Nos. 1 to 3 submits that the writ petition filed by petitioner Praveen Kumar seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against him has, now, become infructuous, as the Police, after the completion of the Investigation, has filed charge sheet against the petitioner before the concerning Magistrate. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 05.06.2006 05.06.2006 G