BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Eighth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15050 of 2011 1 ACHIAMMAL 2 PANDIAMMAL 3 ALAGAMMAL ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 3 Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE USILAMPATTI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT CRIME NO.636/2011, ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. V.SATHISH Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are arrayed as A1 to A3 and they prayed for grant of anticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C., for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 324 and 379 I.P.C. in Crime No.636 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.Heard Mr.V.Sathish, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Durai Pandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal side) appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) would submit in his argument that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital and if for any reason, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners there should be a stringent condition for the accused persons. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I could see that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Usilampatti, Madurai District and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Usilampatti, Madurai District and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 28/11/2011 / TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE USILAMPATTI MADURAI DISTRICT 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE USILAMPATTI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S. V.SATHISH Advocate SR.No.41720 rl/6c – 1.12.2011 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15050 of 2011 Date :28/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/