WP(C) 3358/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. A. Matlib, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Choudhur y, learned S.C., Health Department. As agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition i s disposed of at the motion stage itself. It is submitted that the case of the petitioner is covered by the judgm ent and order dated 03.08.06 passed in the case of Achyut Ranjan Das vs. State o f Assam and others reported in 2006 (4) GLT 674. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of providing that the respond ents may examine the case of the petitioner in terms of the guidelines formulate d in Achyut Ranjan Das (supra). Needless to say that the petitioner cannot claim consideration of his case against any particular post or service and the consid eration will be strictly as per the parameters and yardsticks laid down in the g uidelines. Writ petition stands disposed of.