IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.10296 of 2011 Date of Decision : July 12, 2011. Emmanuel Gill and others .....Petitioners versus The State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.S.P.Soi, Advocate for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners are the old retirees who have now raised their claim for higher pay scales of JST Grade in terms of the Government Instructions dated 19.2.1979 (Annexure P-6). There are very cryptic averments in the writ petition and it is difficult to ascertain as to whether this Court had accepted the claim of the similarly placed teachers or not. Be that as it may, in view of the fact that the legal notice dated 22.2.2011 (Annexure P-11) served on behalf of the petitioners is statedly pending consideration, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the claim of the petitioners in the light of the Government Instructions dated 19.2.1979 CWP No.10296 of 2011 [2] (Annexure P-6) and the decisions of this Court, if any, including those relied upon by the petitioners, and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order within a period of six months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. July 12, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE