Writ Petition No. 912 (SS) of 2007 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J Heard Sri K.S. Bhaskar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Paresh Tripathi, learned counsel for State of Uttarakhand on behalf of respondents. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: i Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of Mandamus to pay the salary according to revised pay scale since 04.10.2001 (Annexure no. 3). ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of Mandamus to decide the representation within the stipulated time (Annexure no. 4). iii. Issue any other writ, order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstance of the case in favour of petitioner. iv. Award the cost of the petition to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner has already made representation on 08.01.2007, raising all his grievances, before respondent no.3 During the course of argument, learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer that writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to respondent no. 3 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 08.01.2007. The prayer is innocuous. Consequently, I direct the respondent no. 3 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 08.01.2007, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. With this direction, writ petition as well as stay application is disposed of. No order as to costs. (M.M. Ghildiyal, J) 19.07.2007 SKS