1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 47 OF 2010 Shri Subhash Mohan Pawar ...Petitioner VERSUS The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ..... Shri S.J.Salgare, advocate for the petitioner Shri S.D.Kaldate, APP for the respondent ..... CORAM : P.V.HARDAS AND SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, JJ. DATED : 09.03.2010 ORAL ORDER 1 A communication sent by the petitioner through jail has been registered as Criminal Writ Petition. We had accordingly appointed Shri S.J.Salgare, learned counsel to represent the petitioner in this petition. The grievance of the petitioner in the said communication is that the petitioner is not being granted furlough. One of the grounds for rejecting the application of the petitioner is 2 that his father Mohan Dhondiba Pawar had sold the house and is residing elsewhere. In that light of the matter, therefore, we had directed the petitioner to file an affidavit of the father of the petitioner as to whether the residential house had been sold by the father of the petitioner. Upon instructions from the petitioner, learned counsel has filed an affidavit, in which it is stated that the father of the petitioner had not sold the house. 2 Learned A.P.P. has filed counter affidavit and has also produced copy of the sale deed. Thus, the petitioner has deliberately made a false statement before us in order to mislead the court. We, therefore, decline to entertain this petition on this ground alone. 3 Writ Petition is accordingly summarily dismissed with no order as to costs. We, however, quantify the fees payable to the learned counsel appointed on behalf of the petitioner at Rs.2,000/-. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) (P.V.HARDAS, J.) dbm/crwp47.10