IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.613 of 2006 SANTOSH KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 05/ 02.07.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for directing the respondents authorities to publish the result of the petitioner of I.T.I. Final Examination of Trade Mechanist held in July 2001 for session 1999-2001 by Industrial Training Institute, Muzaffarpur, which was withheld by the respondents authorities in spite of high marks obtained by the petitioner. In their counter affidavits, respondent nos. 1 to 4 had specifically stated that by order of the Government vide Memo No. 724 dated 15.06.2002 (Annexure-A) issued by Director, Employment and Training Department, Patna, the registration of several students were cancelled due to specific irregularities having been found in their admissions. Learned counsel for the respondents further states that the admissions of the said students including the petitioner were taken beyond the sanctioned seat and at the time of advertisement as well as at the time of filing of application by the petitioner for admission he did not possess the qualification requisite for the course and there were other irregularities also. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this court by order dated 17.10.2006 directed the authorities to initiate action in accordance with law including departmental proceeding against the persons responsible for such illegal admissions of the boys including the petitioner, who were admitted way back in the year 1999. The respondents were also directed to report compliance by filing a supplementary counter affidavit within a period of eight weeks. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent no.1 in which it has been specifically stated that in compliance of the aforesaid order of this court, departmental proceeding has been contemplated against the concerned persons including the then Principal of I.T.I., Muzaffarpur and accordingly a resolution has been adopted vide Resolution No. 91 dated 11.01.2007 and the same has been sent to the concerned persons along with charge sheet in the prescribed proforma (Annexure-D). It is also stated that a departmental proceeding had already been initiated against the concerned person vide Resolution No.172 dated 16.06.2006 for four charges of different irregularities and vide Resolution No. 91 dated 11.01.2007 a separate charge sheet has been served for presenting the said charges. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the order of this court dated 17.10.2006 stands fully complied. Furthermore, the relief made in the said petition cannot be granted in view of specific order of the authorities concerned vide Memo No. 724 dated 15.06.2002(Annexure- A), which has never been challenged by the petitioner although more than six years have lapsed. In the said circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed. harish/ (S.N.Hussain, J.)