1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application NO. 2527/2009 Monidipa Ajetkumar Maini ..vs.. Ajit Kumar Chamanlal Maini and ors. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ms. Jyoti Dharmadhikari, Advocate for applicant. Ms. Nikhade, Adovcate for non applicant nos. 1 t 3. Mr. Yengal, A.P.P. for non applicant no. 4. CORAM:- R. Y. GANOO, J. DATED:- 7 th AUGUST, 2009. 1. As the application was taken up for hearing, the learned Advocate for the applicant submitted that in the evidence of the applicants, at the stage of examination-in- chief, number of mistakes have crept in and in order to have those mistakes corrected the applicant felt that she should be given permission to enter the witness box and to state correct things and it is, as a result of that, the present application came to be moved before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No. 7, Nagpur in Criminal Complaint Case No. 1205/2007, being application at Exh.-82 i.e. how the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class was called upon to pass an order, which he passed on 20.01.2009. She also submitted that being aggrieved by 2 order dated 20.01.2009, the applicant had filed Criminal Revision Application in the District Court, which was rejected by learned Additional Sessions Judge by order dated 20.05.2009 in Criminal Revision Application No. 287/2009. The present application is filed so as to challenge the two orders as aforesaid. 2. After having heard learned Advocates of both the sides, it is noticed that according to the applicant, certain mistakes have crept in the examination-in-chief, which has been recorded before the Judicial Magistrate First Class. The applicant has prayed to have those mistakes rectified and have proper evidence recorded so as to keep record straight. In my view, the course adopted by the applicant was wrong. If the applicant was of the opinion that certain mistakes have crept in the copy of the examination-in chief, it was necessary for the applicant to make specific application for rectification of the mistakes. The course adopted by the applicant was not proper and that is how the learned Judges of both Court Courts have appreciated the application and disposed of the same. 3. Looking to the nature of the application filed 3 before the Courts, no fault can be found in the orders passed by the courts below. Hence, the application cannot be entertained. At the same time liberty can be given to the applicant to file regular application requesting the Court to carry out certain corrections as desired by the applicant by filing proper application. 4. With the aforesaid observations, the application is dismissed at the admission stage. It is clarified that if the applicant is of the view that certain mistakes have crept in the body of the examination-in-chief rendered by the applicant, she is free to make an application praying for rectification of the said mistakes. Authenticated copy of this order be provided to the applicant so that the same be presented before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class for further action in the matter. JUDGE kahale