T S.B. (Service Matter) IN THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fCHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION(S) N0^si^ /2011. ^ ^' ^® PETITIONER: ^5 b.& ^•^•T> ^^•r-""" ^.-J^,^ Hawal Ram, son of Sudhan Ram, aged about 36 years, Cook, Pahadi Korwa Ashram, Baijnathpur, Block Batouli, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, ^ D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Assistant Coramissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Sarguja,, Chhattisgarh. 4. Collector, Sarguja, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. 5. Block Educsition Officer, Block Batouli, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE226 OP THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ~5^ T^i^i<n<M, ^Ti1-!-i4i(o', [®ldl<!-tl|,< ..Lj...f7..^....3.1^/l/... HTOtTT (b^(cb ""'"~""v"""'"""""""-~/"""-^ 200 ^?T TT^' (liGlfj<sl<t^) 'STT^T^Tf?^ 'cT^H 3'TT^y s^^jcti '^?TW ^f^T 3^T l [SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J.l 22.6.2011 Shri C.J. K. Rao wifh petitioner. Shri N. Naha Roy, Pan| copy. Leamed counsel for fhj relatmg to claim of contra^ employees came up for consi<| No.2004/11 and batch of pe^ of the petitioners, this Coui case in those cases. He covered by the aforesaid orde|i On the other hand, le?| that the representation of f^ due verification, subifaits Al'ter going tlirough ti^ W.P. (S)No.2004/Il,itis is squarety covered by tl^ petitioner is also entitled to Accordingly, it is direc^ rpprpspntfltinn before the co^ <:r>i^f<rt^1i w-l^if "^f fs^ <f^l<^l< '^'3tRW3T?^T phri Akshay Yadav coLmsel for fhe d Lawyer for the State. on advance petitioner submits that tlie issue t:tual payment to Cook and other leration before this Court in W.P. (S) itions and after examining the claim had directed consideration of the fhat the case of the petitioner is ^med counsel for the State submits petitioner would be decided after e order dated 15.4.2011 pavssed in apjparent that the case offhe petitioner aforesaid order. Therefore, the the saaie direction in tfae case. ^d that if the petitiouer makes fresh cerned authority, clalming payment ^' ^"':'"'- fi^^K^^^ ^ ^^^J^I^t Y ^&:w^-:' XI-HC—78 w^r ^nr ^i^ ^T^TF 3TT^f^:ltoF Prayeen ^\ 'S^T "M|^ld<Lt, '^tW^', f®lQll'M*l< HWWt ^weh •^200 ^n^?r T5W (y*^^) IT^TWC^rftcT ^TT^I -i^ of minimum wages applicabl<| Chhattisgarh CivU Service (C| the same shall be disposed <) period of eight weeks jfr(| representation. In the event ^ would be at liberty to file writ With the aforesaid dired of. <^i^t<n^lTi 'WR^ff ^ f^st ipaK^K ^>3fRfqf3T?^r to a contract employee under the ontract Appomtment) Rules, 2004, 'f in accordance with law, withm a >m fhe date of submission of »fany adverse order, the petitioner petition afresh. tion, tlie petition is finally disposed Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge