ssm 1 25.wp.9039.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9039 OF 2010 Suryakant Chandrkant Hande ....Petitioner Versus Kanizbano Mahamood Hanif Shaikh and another ....Respondents ___________ Mr. P. B. Badudare i/bwith Ms. Gulistan Dubhash i/by Ganesh Gole for the Petitioner. Mr. Sanjay D. Thodade for the Respondents. CORAM: B. R. GAVAI, J. DATED : 18 TH MARCH, 2011. P.C.: Since the present Petition arises out of interlocutory order passed by the learned Trial Court thereby rejecting the application for temporary injunction, I am not inclined to interfere with the same in extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The Petition is, therefore, rejected. 2. However, taking into consideration the facts and circumstances, the Trial Court is directed to expedite the hearing of ssm 2 25.wp.9039.10 the suit and dispose of the the same as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 6 months from today. 3. Needless to state that the observations made in the impugned orders will not be taken into consideration at the stage of final hearing. (B. R. GAVAI, J.)