IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- Crl. W P No. 867 of 2010 Date of decision: 13.05.2010 Sukhvinder alias Shoki ........ Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Surender Deswal, Advocate for the petitioner -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner filed an application for house repair parole on 14.12.2009 which sent vide despatch No. 22010-11. However, the same has not been decided by the appropriate authority till date. In view of the above, Respondent No. 2 is directed to decide the aforesaid application filed by the petitioner within 10 days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Disposed off accordingly. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 13.05.2010 mohan