IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35590 of 2010 BHANU PRASAD RANJAN, SON OF SATYA PRASAD GUPTA, RESIDENT OF RAMPUR CHAI, P.S. KARPI, IN THE DISTT. OF ARWAL. ------- PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SARITA SALIL, DAUGHTER OF SHRI TRIBHUWAN PRASAD, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA – SHIVAJI PATH, P.S. JEHANABAD, DISTT. JEHANABAD. ----------- 2. 11.10.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 18.8.2010 passed by Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, in Trial No. 1551 of 2010 arising out of Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 381 of 2008 by which the court below has refused the application filed under Section 205 Cr. P.C. The petitioner who happens to be the husband of the Complainant was being prosecuted for various offence including Section 498A I.P.C. in which he was granted regular bail by the Sessions Judge. Since the petitioner is a government employee posted at Baroda House, New Delhi, it is not possible for him to attend the court on each date and, therefore, he sought exemption under Section 205 Cr. P.C. which has been disallowed. Considering the facts of the case, the application is allowed and the order dated 18.8.2010 passed by Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, in Trial No. 1551 of 2010 arising out of Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 381 of 2009 is quashed with a direction that the petitioner shall given an 2 undertaking that he will present himself before the court as and when the court desires. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)