"SfJw^J^^^n^^^^VKfM^s'a'f t^^^^^?'^''^^'.^ SSsaSSsSi/SSiSiSS,: SBBJSasSi— s ••» M lO N It f» <t 8. S f I 5< ? 6 » di w 6«t ff ^ ? 1 ^ I t K 8 M p ® 13 cn 8 < o 0 (* <t a 6 i-i• ® 1 s»s ^ 'Sr 0 ^ <t •?» IVi i N 9 t^ w ft s < wsss 1 ^iy p % ai <8 it & sf » <» jw s 5!*ra &(» ^ f ^ » o tt fh t* 1i I ^' f?- ^ 1 ;:^%^$. ?" w?/-; ',"'••• 3! B <r o "•y^.-/3n!'i-p'^"-:. •^°n"<^2i-- °5 ^ » PETITTCN VfOSER. ARTIO.ES 226/227 OP TOE COBSTITCTTICW O? IBDXA. XI-HC-22 an^r-qit sn^f ?hyicti •i-if^ft ..KS& ::i,:' -'-~af\. T°^ •<fWK'i'if,-9fli'y<is, («icii'w<i,< W.V. No/ 674/2001 <11H?fT 9i*<l<* sn^i'5WTwgf^i Si'iri V.G« Tamaskar, petltloner. Heard on the questi I<earned counsel for ^^f<^f^ TTTHcff.'^^S <^1^.^ A;3riitTq3TI^I terned counsel for the an of admission. th e petitioner -submits ^rred the petitioner and learned counsel fior the pe^it.ioner has placed his strong reiiance upon the provisiofis contain.ed in 'The persons yith yith Disabiliti®(Equa|- I>earned| vlev of thfe the petitioner is enti^led to be retalnedt:. His further SLibmisslon 1s thatl the Sdstral Government vas [ required to raake some rule^ to protect the individuals from the vice o£ transfers that a person, yho securas :rom one place to another ,!(/ The 4 said Act does not cannot be transrerred The Act simply says that tbe persons suffering with dis^bilities vould have equal opp- ortunit^ of participation jLn education and aaployment. further says that there shall be no dlscrimiaatlon only on the ground of disa^ility and State Co-ordination [Tt^^T^? 4- M??1^I •f'FTW-SII^I sn^i'^raiw^ita 4il«(lCT<frTtiFRtf '£['fe^ Tfe?R •^ 3^^TO ^SIT^F 1 « • !A- * o 1 Committee so aSJ.so the C^ntral co-ordination i . i Committee shall be ]ajiai&ad-«<^v>/>J After going tlirough the petition.and the Act, we are unable to hold that tlie petitioner can see't any protection under fhis Acta So far as question of non-frama;n|g of .'the rules are con- cerned, in this petitionj under Article 227 of t'.-ie -to eonstltutiona vhere ve haive7 examin^-the aorrectnee an3 validity of the ordar! passed by the Central ItfQ^a.not. ba open for Administratlve 1i-ibuna-l, us to issae InstruGtlons or directlons to the Ceatral Government to frame some rules petltioner feels that suah Rule should be framed, then he~ may approach appropriate'forura for franing certain rules. * On the merits ye are. unable to hold thafc the transfeit' order suffers vith the vice o£ excesslveness or malafide. The TribunaB. has given cogent reasi for rejecting the petition. We find no reason to interrere. This pstition Sd/- ChiefJustice is disra.i.ssed Sd/- R.S. Garg Judge