SAS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1005 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1005 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1005 OF 2006 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.485 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.485 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.485 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Rajshri Productions P. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.A.D.Kango with P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. Mr.S.J.Mehta for respondent. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007. DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007. DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- There is a delay of 429 days in preferring the appeal. The I.T.A.T. order was received on 20/9/2004. The C.I.T. approval was received on 17/1/2005. The appeal was filed on 23/3/2006. There is no explanation whatsoever for the delay between 17/1/2005 to 23/3/2006. Considering the cause shown, the same would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence Motion is dismissed. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.)