In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh R. F. A. No. 2681 of 2009 (O&M) Karan Singh and others ..... Appellants vs Haryana State and others ..... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. D. K. Sihag, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. Ashish Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal J. The land owners are in appeal before this Court against the award of the learned Court below for further enhancement of the compensation for the acquired land. Briefly, the facts are that vide notification dated 7.11.1997, published on 12.6.1997, under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, `the Act'), State of Haryana acquired land situated within the revenue estate of Village Surewala Hadbast No. 86, Tehsil and District Hissar for construction of New Grain Market, Vegetable and Fruit market at Surewala and Budha Khera, District Hissar. The Land Acquisition Collector vide his award dated 7.6.2000, determined the market value of the acquired land at Rs. 2,00,000/- per acre of land situated on road upto one acre depth and after that @ Rs. 1,75,000/- per acre for nehri, gair mumkin land. The learned Additional District Judge, on reference under Section 18 of the Act, determined compensation @ Rs. 2,40,000/- per acre for the land falling on National Highway upto the depth of one acre and Rs. 2,05,000/- per acre for the interior land. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the claim of the appellants in the present appeal is squarely covered by judgment in RFA No. 1930 of 2005 – Smt. Sukhdei and others vs Haryana State and others, decided on 5.11.2008, whereby the compensation for the acquired land vide same notification has been further enhanced. Learned State counsel did not dispute the aforesaid factual position. Accordingly for the reasons recorded in Smt. Sukhdei's case (supra), the present appeal is disposed of in the same terms. 2.3.2010 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge