IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) 11784 of 2008. Decided on October 19, 2011. Kahan Singh & others …Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. & others …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner Ms. Meghna, Advocate, vice Mr. M.L.Sharma, Advocate. For respondents 1 & 2 Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Asstt. A.G. For respondent No. 3 Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate. Surjit Singh, Judge (oral) It is not disputed by the learned Counsel for the parties that the present case is covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in CWP (T) No. 11331 of 2008, titled as Inder Kumar versus State of H.P. & others and other connected matters, decided on 31.12.2010. 2. Consequently, the respondents are directed to consider the cases of the petitioners, in view of the principles laid down in the aforesaid case, within a period of four months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment. No costs. Disposed of. October 19, 2011(PC) (Surjit Singh ), J. Whet her report ers of t he l ocal papers may be al l owed t o see t he j udgment ?