[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION W.P.NO.6055 OF 2008 Shri.Avinash Anant Bhoir and Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. Addl. Collector & Competent Authority, Thane and Ors. ..Respondents ... Mr.A.R.Shaikh advocate for Petitioners Mr.P.M.Patil AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 ... CORAM: BILAL NAZKI AND CORAM: BILAL NAZKI AND CORAM: BILAL NAZKI AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : APRIL 15, 2009 DATE : APRIL 15, 2009 DATE : APRIL 15, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Proceedings pending under the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 when the State of Maharashtra had adopted Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999. The contention of the Petitioners is that though notice was issued under Section 10(3) of the Act, possession had not been taken. This fact is admitted in paragraph 12 of the counter affidavit filed by the Additional Collector and Competent Authority. In this view of the matter, writ petition has to be allowed in view [-2-] of the judgment dated 25.7.2008 of this Court passed in W.P.No.8356 of 2006 Voltas Ltd. Vs. Additional Collector & Competent Authority, Thane (Coram: D.K.Deshmukh and V.C.Daga, JJ.). 2. Petition is accordingly disposed of. [BILAL NAZKI, J.] [BILAL NAZKI, J.] [BILAL NAZKI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]