1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2520 OF 2011 LLoyd Francis Baptista Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra and others Respondents Ms.Mallika Ingale for petitioner. Mr.Anil Tiwari for respondent nos.5 and 6. Mr.J.P.Yagnik, APP a/w V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP for respondents 1 to 4. Respondent no.6 present. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKALR AND P.D.KODE, JJ. DATE : 21st October 2011 PC : 1. During the pendency of this petition the private parties have amicably settled all their differences. They have agreed that while in Canada the order of the New Zealand Court will be followed by the parties. As regards the arrangement in India, the consent terms duly signed by the private parties and their respective advocates will be the governing conditions to be abided by both the parties meticulously. 2. The assurance given by the petitioner as well as respondent nos.5 and 6 in this petition as recorded in consent terms which are handed in to the Court and taken on record marked `X' are accepted. The parties are permitted to amend the condition no.11 to provide that the petitioner's passport will be deposited by him with the Registrar of 2 this Court for the relevant period referred to in paragraph 11 of the consent terms. The amendment is carried out by the parties and has been counter signed by their advocates. 3. In view of the arrangement now agreed upon by the parties which is in the interest of all concerned, we accede to the joint request made by them through their counsel that the passport of respondent no.6 deposited in this Court be returned to him forthwith. The petition is disposed of in the above terms. Ordered accordingly. (P.D.KODE, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)