IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CM No.966 of 2009 in CWP No.10739 of 2007 Date of decision: January 22, 2009 Ramesh Chand ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. K.L. Dhingra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J.(Oral) CM No.966 of 2009 For the reasons recorded in the application, the same is allowed. Replication filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner is taken on record. CWP No.10739 of 2007 It is not disputed that as regards the amount of Rs.25,000/- the respondents have withheld that amount on account of alleged wrong grant of ACP Grade and it was covered in SLP (C) No.14099 of 2006. According to that SLP, service on regular post in Municipal Committee would be counted for the purpose of grant of ACP to the employees who were subsequently absorbed in other departments. As regards the amount of Rs.50,000/- is concerned, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no due certificate had to be issued by the respondent No.4. In these circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider this aspect and to release the remaining amount of Rs.25,000/- as well as any other remaining retiral benefits within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. January 22, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE