IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27015 of 2011 Md. Mokim son of Md. Moinuddin Versus The State Of Bihar & anr. ----------- 3. 24.8.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence u/s.379 of the Indian Penal Code and 135 of the Indian Electricity Act. Considering that the petitioner caused the loss of more than 4 lacs rupees by stealing electricity, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, if the petitioner files a representation before the Compounding Board and pays the assessment amount as raised by the Electricity Department, he would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )