1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.703 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri V.N. Tayade for the Petitioner. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 3RD FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C.: . Heard Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. By the impugned order, an application made by the Petitioner for de-exhibiting certain documents has been rejected by the trial Court. The order impugned is purely of interlocutory in nature. The order is capable of being challenged in an Appeal which may be preferred by the Petitioner against a decree passed in the suit if the same be adverse to the Petitioner. 2. Even if a document is marked as Exhibit, the issue regarding proof of contents of the document and evidenciary value thereof always remains open. 2 3. Subject to what is observed above, the Writ Petition is rejected. (A.S.OKA ,J