CRP 192/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B D AGARWAL Heard Sri S Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri J Sarma, learned counsel for the respondents. This revision application has been filed by the defendants again st the order dated 27.04.2010, passed by the learned Munsiff No. 4, Kamrup, Guwa hati, in Title Suit No. 487 of 2007, whereby the learned Munsiff has rejected th e prayer of the defendants to produce certain documents. Along with the revision petition, the petitioners have also anne xed a copy of the affidavit evidence of DW-1, wherein the following statement ha s been made: That there is no question of illegal eviction of the plaintiffs from the shop-rooms under their occupation either from my uncle during his life time or thereafter from us (as I along with my two brothers became the landlord as his legal heirs). It is needless to say that the plaintiffs as the responsibl e tenants also have the duty and obligation to pay just and reasonable monthly r ents against their tenancy to their landlord which they are not inclined to pay and we have not seen any positive gesture from their end till now though they ha ve made an averment in the plaint regarding payment of reasonable rent. It may be mentioned here that the suit has been filed by the present respondent s, praying for a decree to restrain the defendants or their agents from interfer ing with the peaceful possession of the plaintiffs in the suit premises and othe r consequential reliefs. Since the defendants/petitioners have admitted the fact that the plaintiffs/tenants shall not be evicted illegally a decree can be pass ed in terms of the statements made by DW-1 in his affidavit evidence. During the course of hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners al so admitted the fact that after filing of the case, they are regularly getting t he rent from the defendants. It may be mentioned here that if the tenants defaul t in paying the rent or if the landlords have any new cause of action, they shal l always be at liberty to file a suit for eviction. With the aforesaid observations, this revision petition stands disposed of.