IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 14TH DECEMBER 2009 / 23RD AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 35184 of 2009(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. P.C.THOMAS, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O.CHACKO, PAPPLNLSSERIYIL HOUSE, KARIKKODE P.O., PERUVA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. P.K.BAVAKUNJU, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O.KACHADIMA, PALCKYPARAMBIL HOUSE, PALAPRASSERY, CHENGAMANAD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. SAJEEV ABRAHAM, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O ABRAHAM, KUMBLASSERIL HOUSE, KARIKKODE P.O., PERUVA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 4. T.B.KOCHUMUHAMMED, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O BAVU, THACHAKATHU HOUSE, PALAPRASSERY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. T.K.RAJU, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.KUTTAPPAN, THETTALIL HOUSE, PAZHOOR EAST, PIRAVAM P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. MANOJ P.GEORGE, AGED 31 YEARS, S/O GEORGE, PUTHYAKUNNEL HOUSE, PAZHOOR EAST, PIRAVAM P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 7. K.S.SHIJI, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.SUKUMARAN, KUTTIKKATTIL HOUSE, MULAKULAM, PIRAVOM P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 8. K.R.BABU, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O RAGHAVAN, MALAYIL HOUSE, KALAMBOOR P.O., PIRAVAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 9. ALIAS VARGHESE, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O VARKEY, ATTYANEDATH HOUSE, KALAAMBOOR P.O., PIRAVAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 10. SANTHOSH K.K., AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.KRISHNAN, KALARIPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHENGAMANAD P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 11. P.K.ABDU, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O.KUNJUMUHAMMED, ANU NIVAS, ATHANI P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. DR.VINCENT PANIKULANGARA SRI.V.S.CHANDRASEKHARAN SMT.LEKSHMI SWAMINATHAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. PIRAVOM GRAMA PANCHAYAT (SPECIAL GRADE) REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, PIRAVAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT. 3. GEOLOGIST, DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, DISTRICT OFFICE, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM. SC SRI.S.SREEKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J ........................................... WP(C).NO. 35184 OF 2009 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2009 JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the first respondent Panchayat states that petitioners are similarly situated to those covered by Ext.P54 judgment and the benefit of that judgment and the provisions contained therein could be made applicable to the petitioners also. Accordingly, it is ordered that the petitioners' request will also stand covered as per Ext.P54 and the judgment in WP(C)33107 of 2009 will stand appended to this judgment. The parties will act in terms thereof. THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE lgk/15/12