IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 11884/2008 Decided on:27.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Sushila Devi. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Haminder Chandel, Advocate for respondent No.4. ____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Petitioner has assailed the appointment of respondent No.4 to the post of Part Time Lady Shishu Palak. The suitability of the petitioner and respondent No.4 has been gone into by a duly constituted Selection Committee. Petitioner has secured 7.7 marks and respondent No.4 has secured 9.4 marks. Since the suitability of the petitioner and respondent No.4 has been gone into by a duly constituted Selection Committee, this Court will not sit in appeal over 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 the same. Moreover, no rejoinder has been filed by the petitioner to the averments contained in the reply filed by the respondents. Accordingly, there is no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. 27.12.2010 *awasthi*