@ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 2767/2003 Mahes’h Pxasad Shah S/o Sri Rampyre Shah, Age about 65 years, Caste-General Resi Sadar Bazar Rajgarh (C.G.). Deendayal Khajrwal S/o Ganpat Rai aged abcut 50 yrs, Resi of Raigarh (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. .- RESPONDENTS (SB :Hon’ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present1— Ms. Hamida Siddiqui, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Santosh Kumar Tiwari, Advocate for the respondent. ORDER (Passed on 20]09]201 1) 1. By this pet'm'on under Anicle 227 of the Constitution of India petitioner has challenged the legality and propriety of the order dated 17/7/2003 passed by 4th Civil Judge Class-2, Raigarh in execution of order passed in 92/ 94 Miscellaneous Case Number [Breach of injunction under Order 39 Rule 2(A)] whereby trial Court has directed for issuance of attachment warrant. Application for review of aforesaid order was also dismissed vide order dated 22/8/2003 by 4th Civil Judge Class-2, Raigarh. Ms. Hamida Siddiqui, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Santosh Kumar Tiwan', Advocate for the respondent are heard. 3. Both the orders impugned perused. Both the orders are unambiguous and Court are required to take serious view in case of breach of injunction, I do not find any illegality in the orders impugned. Consequently, petition is liable to be dismissed and is \ hereby dismissed. However, considering old dispute relating to ‘ WV - I \ breach of injunction especially in the light of judgment in second appeal relating to main dispute if parties settle dispute amicably and files settlement/compromise application before the Court below then Court below shall consider the same and decide 0n its own merits with a visw to decide the dispute finally and to reach in its logical conclusion acceptable to both the palties. No order as to costs. In View of the above, I.A. “No. 1 application for urgent healing stands disposed of. 1K“ “ax l Sd/— T.P. Shayma Judge 3" a ’.