W“ WV 63K$6 " IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATIJ‘S/GARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION’NO. swrj 12005. / PETITIONER / Ku Krm Masm aged about 27 years D/o Shrl lnayat Masnh P O Bhum Distt‘ Durg (C.G.), RESP Single Bench xe5h§§g§ I‘M f VERSUS 0NDENTS: y/ State ofChhattisgarh, Through : Secretary, Adim Jati / and Annusuchit Jati Vikas Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, \P Raipur, P.O. and Distt. Raipur ($3 - ‘90 (6.6.) Member 8ecretary, Jati Praman Pratra Uchchstariy Chhanbin Samiti, Office ,of Commissioner Aadrrn Jati rarha, Annusuchrt Jati Vikas Ravi Shankar University Campus, Raipur. §) Chhattisgarh State Electricity // Board Through Secretary, Danganiya, Raipur, P.O. and Distt. Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2§6f22T OF THE CONSTITUTION FOR ISSUANCEI OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS AND ANY OTHER WRIT,/ DIRECTIONL ORDER. § Xl-HC~78 . .W.:9.:.3.7. ?n§. W aim'ai WW,W,W aq2oos‘ mama—rim v ammsrm mm 11% mat WWW§W.W aiwma . Shri Pankaj Shrivas'mm, Panel Lawyer for responden‘rs and 2. 21 ‘ 10. 2005 W.P. N0.3729/2005 anésiW (gafgw) SmT. Meem Jaiswal, counsei for fhe pe'ri'rioner. Nona for responden‘r N 3.3. Shri Nimnjan Singh Rajpu’r, Officer—in-charge, is prasent aiong )efore The Commif‘i’ee. wifh ‘rhe records of “the case Heard. V This wrH’ pe‘ri‘i'ion has da‘red 4.4.2005 passed in cas by The Anusuchi‘r Janja‘fi Uch The main confenfion c fhcn“ in The maf‘rer of her Ca: upon by fhe Commiffee 1’0 fi suppor'r of her Casfe cerfific pefh‘ioner appeared before sfafemen'r along wifh cerfain was given fo her. The furfher confen’riov I of learned counsel for fhe pefifioner is Thaf in sfeacl of waning fill 11.4.2005, The Commih‘ee passed fhe//_ 7/ been filed agains’r fhe impugned order e No. 58-02004 (Annexur'e P—1) passed 1a Sfariya Chhanbin Samifi' Raipur(C.6.)i f learned counsel for The pefi’rioner is ;1'e cerfifica'le, fhe pefifioner was called e her reply and necessary documenfs in ‘a’re. She submifs Thaf on 17.3.2005, The The Commiffee and filed her wriffen documen‘fs and fur’rher dafe of 11.42005 \‘ ‘ ‘ XI~Hc-78 ' anisrmW mumsrm mmmftww aiwma and in ‘H'Iis manner, The pefi‘rioner was impugned order on 4.4.2005 deprived wifh a righf of hewing which is'in viokmon of fundamen‘ml When These allegaTions were made on This CourT wanTed’ ThepeTiTioner To fiie ueedings before The CommiTTee on which ‘Tioner had prayed for 15 days Time on 17.8.2005. On 14.9.2005, leq1rned counsel for ThepeTiTioner repor'red T No.2 has declined To give any paper To haTTer, counsel for respondenT No.2 was re records of The proceedings in original principles of ncfuml jus'rice. The earher dafes of hearing, The order shears 6f The prot iearned counsel for fhe peT ThoT The office of responder her and in This view of The r direcTed To produce The enTi on 29*” SepTember 2005. In pursuance ofThe o' The case is presenT in person I have perused The rec 0n 17.3.2005, an orda signaTures of The Members ¢ f The CommiTTee ThaT The peTiTioner and her faTher boTh appeared. be ore The CommiTTee, They were heard. IT is also recorded ThaT They had filed Their wriTTen sTaTemenT and cerTain documenTs on earlie occasion, And ThereafTerl iT has been l recorded ThaT The maTTer i closed for orders and ulTimaTely a daTe of 4.42005 is menTioned n The order sheetin‘l‘his order sheeTTTi foresoid order, The Officer-in-charge of plong wiTh The enTire records. ords of The commiTTee. r sheeT has been recorded Through The l l l l Wmqfm W200 mam (WW) mmWsnéai , l” @ m mmm 111200 mslw(Wa) amméawim mamm - . ‘ Ema-(mam! r 3 , WW#MW ' am%qaném appears signm‘ures o'f 'l’wo persons which according To The learned, counsei for The pe'ri‘rioner are fhe sigm‘rur'es of The peTMoner and her fa‘rher. ’ UlTimafe!y, 'rhe ord impugned in This peTiTion‘ During The course ar umenTs, learned counsel for The peTiTioner submiTs Tha‘i' an applicaTi n of review has been filed which was received by The CommiTTee n 4.6.2005. The Officer-in-char e appearing in This case furnished This informaTion ThaT The final cision onThis review applicaTion has noT been Taken and The sa is pending for iTs disposal and The CommiTTee, afTer Taking c gnizance in The maTTer has direcTed The CollecTor To furnish some iv formaTion in This regard and a D.O. leTTer has been issued To The furTher submiTs ThaT The i formafion from The end of The CollecTor has noT been received. In The facTs and circumsTances of The case, when The ‘CommiTTee .iTself has Ta n cognizance in The maTTer of review applicaTion filed by The pe iTioner, I am'noT inclined To inTerfere wiTh The impugned order, Annex re P-l, which becomes The SubjecT maTTer / was passed an 4.4.2005 which has been llecTor vide order daTed 1.7.2005. He SP/FS/2005 - 20,000 e e m XI-HC-78 H1200 mgrw (Wm) f\4, mazmm‘fm mmamim mm'm‘a’m a5W 311%?! mmm 311w (Y of review before me Commif‘tee i‘rsehc. I dispose of fhis pefmon a? fhis s‘mge. The Officer—in-charge of +his case submi‘rs Tha‘r as soon as The repérf of fhe Collecfor is received, ’rha ma‘r'i'er shali be Taken in To considera’rion and necessary or ders will be passed. I'i is expected ‘rha'r fhe: Commi’r‘ree wiil fake all The necessary sTeps 1‘0 expedife The maf‘iei a'r The eariiesf possible dafe and The concerned Coileci’or will also cnopem’re in The maf’rer. In The facTs and circumsTances of The case, This Cour‘r expeci’s ThaT The proceedings of r’ view before The CommiTTee will be expediTed wiThin a period of 10 weeks from Today. A copy of This order shall be produced befo e The CommiTTee by The peTiTioner and The CommiTTee will'apprise T e CollecTor concerned wiTh The order passed by This CourT Today wi h a View To expediTe The hearing wiThin The sTipulaTed period waded y This CourT. WiTh The aforesaid obs. rvaTions, This peTiTions sTands disposed of aT This sTage. ConsequenTly, M.W.P. o. 3134/2005 and I.A.No.7647/2005 sTand disposed of. CerTified copy as per r les. Sdl- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge