IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2221 of 2010 RAM LAGAN DHARHI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 21.4.2010 Heard Smt. Anjana Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr. Indiwar Kumari, learned A.P.P. for the State. After having heard the parties, specially, the counsel appearing for the petitioner whose tenacity I must record with quite some amount of praise, the Court does not find it a case in which a direction should be issued for releasing the petitioner on bail, not because the Court has no other reasons in that behalf except what it had already stated while passing the order contained in Annexure-1 but also that this Court had also fixed a timeframe of one year for concluding the trial in Sessions Trial No. 730 of 2006 in case of RadheyTanti when his petition for bail in Cr. Misc. No. 52340 of 2008 was dismissed. It is desirable that the same timeframe is applied to the whole case if the trial is running in a composite manner and the trial be concluded within that period. With the above clarification, the petition is dismissed. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)