1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Writ Petition No.3149/2010 ( Satyanarayan Bisanlal Agrawal & another -: versus :- Govindrao Gotuji Jamnekar & others ) With Writ Petition No.3153/2010 ( Satyanarayan Bisanlal Agrawal & another -: versus :- Govindrao Gotuji Jamnekar & others ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri J.B. Kasat, Adv. for petitioners. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JULY 15, 2010. Common order. Satyanarayan - the present petitioner is defendant in R.C.S. No.2/2008. The petitioner has also filed R.C.S. No.1/2008 against present respondent. In both the suits, he filed application seeking leave to join State Government as party. Dispute between parties is in relation to piece of land. Petitioner claims it as a alluvial land while respondent is not accepting it. The Court below has found that State Government need not be added as party in this private dispute. Adv. Shri Kasat argues that all orders passed by Revenue Authority are in favour of petitioner, issue of ownership is framed and State Government is a necessary party to adjudicate the dispute finally. In view of rival contentions, as noticed by Trial Court, it 2 is apparent that role of State Government is at the most that of witness. At this stage no interference is warranted in writ jurisdiction. Writ petitions are therefore, dismissed. JUDGE Tambaskar.