1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8065 OF 2009 Tanaji M. Patil & Ors. ....Petitioners V/s. Sindhudurg Zilla Sahakari Krushi Gramin Bahuddeshiya Vikas Bank Ltd. & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.P.D. Dalvi for the Petitioners. Mr.M.S. Topkar for the Respondents. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 18TH FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C. :- 1. Rule. By consent Rule is made returnable and heard forthwith. 2. Pursuant to the orders of this Court dated 29.9.2009 and 30.11.2009, a report has been filed by Respondent No.1 before the Industrial Court and before this Court. In view of the changed circumstances, it would be necessary for the parties aggrieved thereby to challenge the same if they so desire. Only one out of the six Petitions has been considered to be eligible for being considered for promotion. That too is subject to the verification of his caste certificate. The other Petitioners would have to challenge the fresh report. 3. In the circumstances, the Writ Petition is disposed of by the following order :- i). Item (2) of the impugned order dated 4.7.2009 stands 2 confirmed.s ii). Ad-interim order dated 25.6.2008 shall continue only upto and including 22.3.2010. Any extension therefore shall be sought by the concerned Petitioners if they so desire in appropriate proceedings to challenge the fresh report. Neither party shall seek any adjournment. If such an application is made, the Petitioner shall give at least four days notice to the Respondent’s advocate of making of any ad-interim application. All the issues between the parties are kept open. iii). No order as to costs.