1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 394/2002 (Mohd. Mohatashin Neoyamotullah Vs. Collector, Bhandara & 2 ors.) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. Mr. I.J. Damle, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr. S.Y. Deopujari, A.G.P., for R-1 & 2. Mr. V.S. Kukday, Adv. for R-3. CORAM :D.D. SINHA & SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 28, 2008. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Civil Application No. 539/2008 is moved by the respondent nos.1 and 2 for early hearing of the writ petition. The learned Assistant Government Pleader states that “Nirwan Sandghat” was allotted by the respondent nos. 1 and 2 in favour of the respondent no.3, pursuant to the opening of tenders on 21/12/2001, for the period from 1/1/2002 to 31/12/2002. The learned Assistant 2 Government Pleader states that the said period is over and, therefore, looking to the prayers made in the petition, the cause of action does not survive and the petition has become infructuous. In the backdrop of the above referred facts, particularly when the period for which the Sand Ghat was allotted to the respondent no.3 is over, the cause of action does not survive and consequently, writ petition is disposed of, being infructuous. JUDGE JUDGE RMP