1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.98 OF 2009 Mukund M. Goradia .... Petitioner Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Mumbai & Ors. .... Respondents S/Shri Madhukar Dalvi i/b Pravin Singhal for the Petitioner. Ms A.S. Pai, APP, for the State. CORAM: BILAL NAZKI & A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED: SEPTEMBER 9, 2009 P.C: The petitioner is praying that a direction be issued to respondent No.6 to take over the investigation in CR-No.70/98, registered with the DCB-CID, Anti-Extortion Cell, Mumbai, CR-No.3/01 and CR-No.2/08, both registered with the Andheri Police Station, Mumbai. On instructions, the learned APP submits that investigations in all the said CRs have been completed, charge-sheets have been filed and the cases are pending in Court. Another prayer is that respondent No.6 should 2 be directed to register and inquire into the complaint of the petitioner dated 7-11-2008. The main allegation in the said complaint was that the petitioner had received telephone calls from a particular phone number on his mobile phone and office landline number on a particular date and a demand of Rs.10 lakhs was made by the caller and further that in case he did not satisfy the demand, he was threatened with life. The respondents have filed their affidavit stating that on checking the records from the mobile phone company, they have come to the conclusion that no such call was made from the given caller s number to the recipient numbers on the said date. It is further stated in the affidavit that the MTNL, Mumbai in its report has stated that "data is not available for the said period". Therefore, the allegations were false. In this view of the matter, we do not think any further action is needed to be taken in the complaint of the petitioner. The petition is misconceived and is accordingly dismissed. (BILAL NAZKI, J.) (A.R. JOSHI, J.)