IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-5741 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: 25.02.2011 Ramesh Kumar Pashan ..........Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ..........Respondents BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. DB Singh, Advocate for Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, AAG, Punjab. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that in view of the reply filed by the respondent-State that calendra has been filed against respondent No.4, the present petition has become infructuous and may be dismissed as such. Dismissed as having become infructuous. February 25, 2011 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE Note:-Whether this case is to be referred to the Reporter .......Yes/No