IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12349 of 2011 1. JANARDAN YADAV 2. ANIL YADAV 3. GORIBAN YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 29.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Allegedly, petitioner no. 1 gave one lathi blow on the head of the informant, petitioner no. 2 gave one rod blow to the informant’s son, namely, Chandan Kumar as a result of which he sustained injury on his head and petitioner no. 3 also gave Garasa blow to the informant’s son as a result of which he sustained injury on his head. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the informant has received two injuries and the injury which has been found on the skull, is simple in nature and similarly, the injured Chandan Kumar has not received any injury on his head, which is evident from Annexure-3 series. Although, learned court below has mentioned that all the injured have received injuries on their head but it appears to me that the above stated finding of the learned court below is nothing but only an error on record. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 2 Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda in connection with Harnaut P.S. Case No. 280 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )