IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5812 of 2007 PRAFULL KUMAR SINGH & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS For the petitioner : M/S Mr. Basant Kumar Chaudhary, Mr. Suresh Pd. Singh, Advocates. For the Board : Mr. Sunil kumar Mandal, Advocate. For the Intervener Respondent: Mr. S.N. Pathak, Advocate. ----------- 4. 6.5.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioners are the students of Maulana Azad Primary Teachers Training College, Amba within the District of Sitamarhi for the Session 1987-89, which according to the petitioner was a recognized institution and the petitioners were within the intake capacity fixed under the order recognizing the institution for the said session. Having prosecuted their studies for Session 1987-89 they were allowed to appear in the Teachers Training Examination conducted by the Bihar School Examination Board(hereinafter referred to “as Board) in the year 1991 but their results have not been published and then they filed the writ application. In support of their claim that the institution in question was a recognized institution they relied on a report of the three members Committee constituted by the Bihar 2 Legislative Council as is evident from notification dated 18.6.1990, Annexure-3 to the rejoinder affidavit. 3. Let the claim of the petitioner as set out in the writ application as also in the rejoinder be treated as a representation before the Authorities of the Board and be considered by the Secretary of the Board in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and if the petitioners are the students of a recognized institution as also were within the intake capacity and appeared in the said examination then the Board is directed to publish the result of the petitioners. 4. This writ application is, accordingly disposed of. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)