IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 25TH JUNE 2009 / 4TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 25130 of 2005(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ V.SHANMUGHAN,S/O.KARAPPAN, VALIYAVEETTIL HOUSE,OMACHAPPUZHA P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.SURESH KUMAR SRI.K.P.SUDHEER RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE SPECIAL ARBITRATOR/SALE OFFICER, PARAPPANANGADI,PONNANI & KONDOTTY, HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES GROUP, TIRUR,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE PARAPPANANGADI REGIONAL HOUSING CO-OP.SOCIETY LTD.,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, P.O.PARAPPANANGADI,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED AHSHIM FOR R1 SRI.V.RAJENDRAN FOR R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.25130/05 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF SALE NOTICE DT 5.7.2005 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 25130 OF 2005 (N) ===================== Dated this the 25th day of June, 2009 J U D G M E N T Ext.P1, a notice issued by the Sale Officer proposing to sell the property of the petitioner, mortgaged to the Bank, for realising Rs.1,50,218/- as on 30/6/2005 is under challenge in this writ petition. 2. Admittedly, loan was availed of and default was committed. Award has been passed and that award has become final. If that be so, there cannot be any valid challenge against the steps taken by the 1st respondent for realising the amount due under the award. Therefore, I do not find any merit in this writ petition. Writ petition is only to be dismissed and I do so. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp