-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2501 OF 2008 Dr. Ganesh Jagannath Dhumal ... Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra and another ... Respondents Mr. L.H. Patil for the petitioner. Mr. A.S. Gadkari, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. CORAM: BILAL NAZKI & ANOOP V. MOHTA , JJ. DATE: JANUARY 22, 2009 P.C. The petitioner is facing an investigation under the Prevention of Corruption Act. After arguing for a while, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to take all pleas which had taken in this petition before the trial Court, if the charge-sheet is finally filed by the respondents. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the investigation is complete and the charge-sheet is not filed as the sanction to prosecute the petitioner has not been received. 2. Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to take all pleas that were taken in this writ petition and any other pleas that -2- may be available to him in law before the trial court, if the charge-sheet is filed at the time of framing of charge. Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. BILAL NAZKI, J. ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.