IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-31574 of 2010 Date of decision: 01.03.2011 Jeon Singh .. Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .. Respondent Present:- Mr.S.P.S. Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.T.S. Salana, DAG, Punjab. Mr.Vikram Bali, Advocate, for the complainant. * * * * S.S. SARON, J. Learned counsel for the State has submitted that out of 20 PWs cited by the prosecution, 8 witnesses have been examined and 4 witnesses have been given up. In this manner, 8 witnesses remain to be examined. Learned counsel for the complainant has submitted that Sulakhan Singh who was caused fire injury on his left thigh by the petitioner and the complainant-Desa Singh; besides, the son of the deceased-Gurdev Singh namely Sahib Singh remain to be examined. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the petition at this stage with liberty to file a fresh one after the said witnesses have been examined. Dismissed as withdrawn at this stage with liberty as prayed for. (S.S. SARON) March 01, 2011 JUDGE sukhpreet