IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH JUNE 2010 / 19TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 6072 of 2006(W) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ 1. THIRUNELLY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., P.O. KATTIKULAM, WAYANAD DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THES PRESIDENT, THIRUNELLY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., P.O. KATTIKULAM, WAYANAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.RAMKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. P.V. RAMANARAYANAN, `CHIRAMADAM', PAINGATTERY P.O., NALLUMADU, MANANTHAVADY, WAYANAD DISTRICT. 2. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), WAYANAD. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R2 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.K.S. MUHAMMED HASHIM. R1 BY ADV. SRI.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE, SRI.P.V.VARGHESE (KANJIRAMATTOM). THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/06/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 6072/2006-W APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN WP(C) NO. 20931/2004. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT IN AEL 2623/04. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED IN THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER SOCIETY AGAINST P2 ORDER BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: EXT.R1(a): COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED 13/10/2001. EXT.R1(b): COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET DATED 06/05/2002.. EXT.R1(c): COPY OF THE ENQUIRY REPORT DATED 16/08/2002. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs. K. SURENDRA MOHAN, J. ------------------------------------------------------------ W.P(C) NO: 6072 OF 2006 W ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th June, 2010. JUDGMENT This writ petition is filed by the petitioners challenging the action of the Joint Registrar in rescinding two resolutions passed by the Managing Committee of the petitioner, one for terminating the services of the first respondent and the other for approving the termination of the services of the first respondent. The first respondent filed WP(C) No: 6040/2006 seeking to enforce the said order and claiming reinstatement. The parties have settled their differences out of court and the first respondent has agreed to accept voluntary retirement in lieu of reinstatement. A joint petition has been submitted by the petitioners and the first respondent in this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as having been settled out of court. The terms of the settlement shall form part of this judgment. K. SURENDRA MOHAN Judge jj 2