IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 771 OF 2008 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 2 OF 2008 SHRI. RUPO THANU BHOMKAR AND ANR., ... Applicants Versus SHRI. SAZU BONDU BHOMKAR ALIAS SAZU BONDU GAWADE AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Amey Kakodkar,Advocate for the applicants. Mr. P. Talaulikar, Advocate for the respondent No.2. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 19th November, 2008 P.C. 1. Heard Mr.Kakodkar, learned Counsel for the applicants and Mr. P. Talaulikar, learned Counsel for the respondent No.2. 2. By this application, the applicants seek appointment of guardian for minor respondents, who are legal representatives of the respondent No.1. According to the applicant, the respondent No.2, who is the mother of the minor children of the respondent No.1, is fit to be appointed as guardian since her interest is not adverse to those of minor children. 3. The learned Counsel for the respondent No.2 has no objection,if the respondent No.2 is appointed as guardian. 4. In view of the above, the application is allowed. The respondent No.2 is appointed as guardian of minor children of the respondent No.1 and 2 whose names are mentioned in para 1 of the application. The application stands disposed of. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA