Resgandent Piaintiff K030 i M i HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGhRiii AT EILASPUR Writ Petition iArt227i No.2421 oi!f 2911 Sandeep Sunder La: Gupta S/o Sim Sunder Lal Gupta, aged abou: 38 years, Rio 115, Gupta Saddn, Petitioners Defendants Nagpur 44001 8 (Maharashtra) Shri Gurmit Singh B Harvansh Singh Bhatia, years, R/o Besidé o'f Biiaspur (CG) Versus Ashish Kumar Dixit 8.1 — Ashish ‘Biiaspur, Tahsii & District (CG). (Writ Petition under Articie 227 of the Constitution of india) MLSaniay K.Agrawai with Mr.$ourabh None present for the respondent. $harma, counse! ’fm' the petitieners. Centra! Avenue. hatia Sic Late aged about 55 Bank cf India. o Shri Jagdish Gclbazar‘ Bi!aspur 1. By this writ petition under Artioie 22? of the Constitution of india the petitioner has challenged the iegaiity and propriety of the order dated by the 5th affirming the order dated 5.1.2011 paased by ihe 1s‘vCivii Judge Class-ii, Biiaspur, in Civil Suit No.126-Al2010, whereby the 1“ Civil Judge Ciass—Ii has gfanted injunction reéating ts eviction of the petitioners by appiying the procedure other than due process of iaw. 2. Considering the piaint, i do not find any iiiegaiity in the order impugned warranting interference in exercise of superviseryjurisdiction. 3. Consequentiy. the writ petiiion is iiabie to be dismissed and dismissed. No order as‘to costs. 4. interim application stands disposed of? ORDER (22-11—2011) i5.4.2_011 passed Additional Distriot Judge, Bilaspur, in Misc.Civii Appeal No.U4/11. /tx it is hereby . sd/_ T.P. Sharma 2‘ Judge _ ’/ ISB: Hon’bie Mr. T.P. Sharma, JJ 1. Dayaiband. Bilaspur.’ Tahsii & District Prasad, aged about 4Q years, Proprietor . Enterprises,