1 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5466 OF 2009 Juzer Tayabali Nulwala ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr.R.Sathyanarayanan for the applicant Mr.Y.M.Nakhawa, A.P.P for State CORAM : A.R.JOSHI,J. DATE : JUNE 14, 2010 P.C.: 1 Heard rival submissions for sometime in this application for regular bail for the offences under section 302 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. Reportedly, co-accused was arrested on the spot during the incident of murder. The learned A.P.P. Mr.Nakhawa made a statement on instructions that the trial in the matter has already been started about a month back and eight witnesses have been already examined and in the present matter there are four witnesses who are taking the name of the present applicant-accused as to his involvement in the offence. 2 Considering the above and considering the pendency of the trial which is in progress, there is nothing to entertain the present application for bail and hence, same is rejected and accordingly disposed of. Trial Court should make all the endeavour to complete the trial as early as possible considering the seriousness of the offence. JUDGE\