IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-36259 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 28,2011 Kulwant Kaur and another ..................................................... Petitioners Versus Gurpreet Kaur ................................................................... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Rahul Rampal, Advocate for the petitioners. ... RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition to raise all the pleas before the trial Court. Allowed as prayed for. Dismissed as withdrawn. Personal appearance of the petitioners, who are mother-in-law and father-in-law of the respondent, before the trial Court is exempted subject to the following conditions:- (i) petitioner shall be represented through counsel; (ii) shall not delay/stall the trial proceedings; (iii) shall not dispute his identity as an accused; (iv) shall have no objection if the prosecution evidence is recorded in his absence but in the presence of his counsel; (v) shall appear before the trial Court as and when required by the trial Court; and (vi) any other condition which the learned trial Court may impose. 28.2.2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Rupi JUDGE