IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1071 of 2009 Nand Lal Chaudhary, son of Mukti Nath Chaudhary, resident of village- Khakharahi, P.S.-Itarhi, District- Buxar. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. Pramila Devi, wife of Nand Lal Chaudhary, resident of village-Khakharahi, P.S.-Itarhi, District-Buxar at present resident of village-Akauni, P.S.-Narhi, District-Balia (U.P.) ----------- 3. 27.07.2011 The husband petitioner has preferred this revision application against the order dated 13.04.2009 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Buxar in Case No.55 (M)/2008 by which the petitioner has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.1500/-per month to his wife Pramila Devi, opposite party no.2 as interim maintenance. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned A.P.P. for the State. It appears that it is an admitted position that the petitioner is the husband of the opposite party no.2, who is unable to maintain herself. Considering all these facts, the learned Principal Judge has directed the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.1500/-per month to his wife as interim maintenance. The main case is still pending for 2 consideration. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been paying a sum of Rs.1500/-per month to his wife as interim maintenance, but the opposite party no.2 has not produced any evidence in the court and as such, the case is pending for the year 2008. The learned counsel for opposite party no.2 submits that the opposite party no.2 is ready to get the case concluded in the family court. Considering the facts and circumstances as stated above, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. The learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Buxar will take necessary steps for the disposal of the case finally at an early date, preferably within a period of four month. With this direction, this application stands disposed of. V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)