IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 8009 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 09, 2010 Bimal Dev. …Petitioner Versus Om Parkash. … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. D.K. Bhatti, Advocate. for the petitioner. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 12.11.2010 passed by learned Rent Controller, Jalandhar, whereby the application seeking permission to lead additional evidence was rejected. Undisputedly, eviction petition was filed on 29.07.2004; undisputedly evidence of the parties was concluded on 02.03.2007; undisputedly an opportunity was earlier granted by the learned Trial Court to lead additional C.R. No.8009 of 2010 evidence to the petitioner; undisputedly second time also, another opportunity was granted to the petitioner to lead more additional evidence; undisputedly, this is the third application to lead additional evidence, which was rightly declined by the learned Trial Court. No interference is called for. Dismissed. December 09, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2