MLP. (5) NO. PEfInoN'ER ‘ VERsus / RESPONDENTS : 1. / 2. 3. /Dis’rricf Educqfion Officer ComposiTe Building Bilaspur Bilaspur (06.) 4.. Join‘r DirecTor‘, Treasury Account & Pension Bilaspur Dis’r’r. Bilaspu 5 “”7 (C.G.) Government Girls ‘Higher Secondary l School KoTa, Dis’rf. Bilaspur (C.G. . 9% mm SINGLE BEMcH / Smf. Mdhju Singh‘ Thakur W/o Shri Rajesh Singh Thakur‘, Aged a‘bou‘r .45 year‘s, LeTur‘er‘ Governmenf Girls Higher Secondr‘y School KoTa, DisTT. Bilaspur (C.6.) S’raTe of‘Chha’rfisgar‘h Th‘r'ough Secretary, , School Educatio-n Depar’rmem‘ D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur‘ (C.G.) The. Dikec’ror of Public - » Ins’rr‘uc’rion, Pension Bada, Raipur (C.G.) The Principal x, IN THE HON'BLE HIGH couRT OF CHHATTIseARH AT BILASPUR (co; r ) WRIT PETITION U/A 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISAR : BILASPUR ‘ Smt. Manju Singh Thakur Veus State of Chham'sgarh 65 aother WRIT PlITION UNDER ARTICLE 226(227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnjhoui J.) Shri K. S. Pawar, Advocate for he petitioner. Shn' P. K. Bhauri, Panel Lawyer for the respondents] Stats. Petiu'oner Respondcnts '‘ essed on this 8th day of Marc, 20 10) Pa h Learned counsel apearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioner is entitled to grant of two ncrements as she has obtained B.Ed. certincate on he; own expenses. Learned counse urther submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to make a repsentation to h authoriu'es for grant of two incremt pursuant o the judgment and order passed y this Court in Yashwaut Kmar Bharadwaj u. Municipal Cmporation, Durg and another! and a decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Asha Saxea Vs. State of M.P. & 01's.? Learned counsel apearin for the respondents/Ste has no objectin to the above submission made by learned counsel appering for the petiu’oner. In View of the foregoing, thi petition stands disposed of With liberty reserved to the petitioner to make a representation. If the representau'on is nled by the petitioner, the same may 'be considered and decided! in accordance with law on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period order asto costs. t of six weeks n‘om the date of receipt of the representation. No SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI Thakur 7.. 1’ 2006(Il) MPJR~CG 96 2 2009 (In) MPJR (so) 59 w GH Writ Pehtion (S! No. 976 of2010 rs n t d ORDERpran o i l f xe te ens t b u n pg ta o a s