Court No.1 Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 61 of 2001. Naresh Kumar ……………….. Petitioner. Versus State of Uttaranchal through District Assistant Registrar (Co-operative), Udham Singh Nagar and three others. ……………. Respondents. __________________ Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. This petition has been filed by the Petitioner challenging the suspension order dated 20.1.2001 on the ground that the Managing Director of the Committee has passed the suspension order, who is not competent to pass such order. The competent authority to pass the suspension order is the District Administrative Committee. Averment to this effect has been made in Para-7 of the writ petition. The fact that the District Administrative Committee was competent to suspend the petitioner has not been denied by the respondents. Since the order of suspension has been passed by an authority who is not competent to pass the order, therefore the order is without jurisdiction and is liable to be quashed. The writ petition is allowed. Writ of certiorary to quash the order dated 20.01.2001 passed by respondent No.2 is issued. No order as to costs. (P.C. Verma, J.) 10.09.2009 P.Singh Review Application No. 3016/2001 In WPSS 61/2001 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Sri Rajendra Dobhal, learned Counsel for the applicant stated that the review application has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such. In view of above statement, the review application is dismissed as infructuous. (P.C. V., J.) 27.2.2008