THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.257 of 2011 ORDER This civil revision petition is directed against the order of dismissal dated 06.12.2010, passed by the learned II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Courts, Hyderabad in I.A.No.3687 of 2010 in A.S.No.289 of 2009 filed under Order XVI Rule 1 CPC seeking to summon BPS file No.209/C5/CZ/GHMS/2008 with refusal letter dated 17.05.2010, from the office of the Assistant City Planner, GHMC, Circle No.5 Sardar Mahal, Charminar, Hyderabad. 2. The petitioners herein filed O.S.No.3821 of 2004 in the Court of VIII Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, for declaration and for perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from carrying on construction over the suit premises and also for mandatory injunction to demolish the structures raised in the suit premises. The said suit was decreed, against which, the appellant i.e., respondent No.1 herein, preferred A.S.No.289 of 2008. At this stage, the petitioners filed the above said I.A. and two other I.As. Through the impugned common order, the lower appellate Court dismissed the said I.A. along with other two I.As. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioners filed the present civil revision petition. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents. 4. The first respondent herein submitted an application to the second respondent seeking regularization of the unauthorized construction and the same was rejected vide proceedings dated 17.05.2010, against which, he filed W.P.No.8550 of 2011 before this Court. Through order dated 30.03.2011, this Court disposed of the said writ petition leaving it open to the first respondent to avail the remedy of appeal before the authority concerned. When once the proceedings of refusal were issued by the competent authority and on appeal before this Court, the first respondent was unsuccessful, it is not necessary to summon the said proceedings at this stage. Hence, I am of the view that the impugned order needs no interference. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. However, the lower appellate Court is directed to dispose of the appeal expeditiously, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. _____________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J Date:05.08.2011 sj