IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 598 OF 2002 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 598 OF 2002 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 598 OF 2002 Radheshyam Aashulal Thanvi ..Plaintiff versus M/s. R. C. H. Barar & Co. & Ors. ..Defendants Ms. Neeta Solanki i/b. Kiran Jain & Co. for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. DATE ; 20TH SEPTEMBER, 2004. DATE ; 20TH SEPTEMBER, 2004. DATE ; 20TH SEPTEMBER, 2004. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : . The matter is on board for exparte hearing. Heard Advocate for the Plaintiff. She has filed affidavit of service and claiming decree against Defendant Nos. 10, 11 and 12. These defendants have been served as per the affidavit of service. So far as defendant Nos. 11 and 12 are concerned, they have been served personally as per paragraph 5 of the affidavit and so far as defendant No.10 is concerned envelope is returned with the remark "U/C". This is sufficient service. Defendants have not filed any written statement so far, and therefore there shall be a exparte decree against them as prayed in the plaint with future interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of the suit till payment and costs. Refund of Court fees as per the Rules. Decree be drawn up accordingly. . Certified copy expedited. *****