c^^r IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR ^' WRIT PETITION N0. e>'&3 /2003 PETH'IONER Arvind Kumar Sahu, S/o Bahatar Lai Sahu, aged 34 years, Occupation - Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Godhna, R/o ViSlage Godhna-Sheorinarayan, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). -VERSUS- RESPONDENTS 1. ->• ^.- .*<* ^ ^^^' •..•••"ri?,^'-Q>--" ^^ .<• ' 3. 4. State ofChhattisgarh through Secretary, Department of Panchayat & Rural Development, D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.). Collector, Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). Deputy Director (Taachayat), Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). Up-Saq)anch, Gram Panchayat Godhnai, DistrictJanjgir-Champa ^ WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE COMTITUTION OF INDIA FQRJSSUANCE^F A SUITABLE WMT, OR^ERS OR DIKECTION. 7 TT-T-Ti'^-'?'? j'^}-~ ^~i>^--Z,ji, ^^ -i<l*llcf'4, ®'dl'yili»,fawiyy sn^^i 'l?:ri?;sn^i sF"WHR?f ^'.f.N". ss^/^3 -"g^ 200 sn^iTOnwafe «<illfcl<il-<'WRlf 4 ^6 <[»1t$lt ^; sifigir an^n DB: Hon'Me JaaUce K. H. 11. ]Kutang)n, <i*y. & Hon'bte JuaUcc L. C. Bh^oo, J. 1S/10/2003 Petitioiier by Shri Rajeev ^hrivastava, Advocate. Rcspondcnts No. l, 2 an^ 3 by Shri Sunfl Siaha, Additional Advocate General. Respondent No.4 by Shri prateek Shanaa, Advocate. By this writ petition Constitutuin of India the constltutfonal validity and fhe under Artfcles 226/227 of the pctitioDer baa chaUcnged the vircs of Section 36 (l)(m) of the Chhattisgarh Paaich»7at Raj Av^m Oram Swaraj Adhuuyam, 1993 (for short tfae Adhiiuyam) whicl(i lays dowa that no person shafl be eligiblc to bc an office-bearer otj thc Pancharat who has moiie than two liviug ctuMiien oue of wliofm is bom oa or after 26tt> day of Januaiy, 2001. Tlie chaUenge ttj> tfae above cteuse does not sunwre in view ofthc law laki dcwa. by t|ie Hon'bte Apex Court in tfae caae ot Jsved and ethets V». Wsats o: 3003 AIR 8CW 389S and atao ^ Hwyaaa and othef rej»arte<in in vfew of <b.c ordcr passcd by this Court in the case of Yaritnlaat KuaMtf Salin Vs. Starte of Chhattlsgarh and another pa^aed la W»M: Petttton Ito. 463 of 20C».^/2- i>£?-'o'? [^^fia^ XI-EC-22 o "TSEI •^l<il!d<<, i9Tl1'(-l*is, 'f^iRTy ^o.f.l^o. s'SS/S ^Tl^i(T)^Ti 'tn^rf^ fs^ <f^^i< ^siPgq aii^i Thc pctitioncr has atao ch^Benged the ordcr Qfreaioval passcd by tfie CoBcctor, Janjgir Chamjpa dated 4th February 2003. The petitk>ner has effteacious altem^tive reniedy to fite an appeal befoie the Directc? of Rao.cliayat on fhi passed by the Collector. In view of tfae abowe thcr^ is no force in the petition of tbe petitioner, the same is liablc to However, the petitioner shaU b^ Dncctor of Pancbayat against fh^ ^ factual grouads against the order be disiaussed an<l it is disinissed. at Iflierty to fBc appeal before thc p order dated 4th Februaiy, 2003 by wlifch Iie ha? been declared disdualified to contmue aa office bearer ofttic Village Panchsyat Godhn^, Tchsil- Navagarh, District-Janjgir Champa. The petitioner wfll |»c cntiQed to the beaefit of the Innltation for the time spent by Ijmn in UtigatbDLg before thto Coitrt m dus wrtt pnx-eeding. Thc partics are cntitfcd forjcertified copy ofttus qrdear. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- LC.Bhadoo Judge ^ [Tft^ ^Ha^ \' %s