KBP 4752-09.sxw 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4752 OF 2009 Smt.Shantabai Kisan Mhaske and ors. ..Petitioners Vs. Namdeo Amruta Mhaske (deceased – through Lrs.) ..Respondents ......... Mr.A.B.Avhad, for petitioners. Mr.A.B.Tajane, for respondent no.1. ......... CORAM : A.S.OKA, J.. DATE : 18 th August, 2009. P.C. : 1] Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. In appeal preferred by the petitioners an application was made for seeking production of additional evidence. By the impugned order, the said application has been rejected. In appeal of the year 2000, the said application is made in the year 2006. Considering the fact that the order is interlocutory in nature which is capable of being challenged in an appeal which may be preferred against the decree which may be passed in appeal and considering the stage at which the said application was moved, no case is made out for interference at this stage in this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 2] Subject to what is observed above, writ petition is rejected. ( A.S.OKA, J. )