IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39770 of 2008 NAWAL SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.10.2008 Heard Mr. Surendra Kishore Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. and Mrs. Madhubala Verma, learned counsel for the informant. The allegation is that the petitioner attempted to ravish the prosecutrix while she was on way to the field for plucking Mung pods but failed in his attempt because persons of the surrounding areas converged upon the place of occurrence. Further allegation is that the petitioner had attempted the lady of being disfigured by throwing acid and that the petitioner was still continuing in his acts of outraging her modesty in various manners as alleged in the F.I.R. Learned counsel for the informant has resisted the prayer and learned A.P.P. has supplemented her argument by submitting that a lady could better feel the scenario on account of sensitivity of such situation. As regards the facts, the F.I.R. itself indicates that the petitioner was taking a plea that he was falsely implicated and dragged into a controversy by the lady and in that light, let petitioner, namely, Nawal Singh, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, in connection with Bathnaha P.S. case - 2 - no.68 of 2008 ( G.R. no.1184 of 2008) subject to the condition that if at all the petitioner is found indulging in similar nature of offence or is found intimidating the lady or any of her family members and the court is satisfied about it then the court below shall assume that this order has not been passed and take steps for remanding the petitioner to custody. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )