THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Transfer C.M.P.No.428 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner filed O.S.No.516 of 2006 in the Court of District Judge, Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar for the relief of declaration that the gift settlement deeds, dated 18.04.1996 and 23.03.2001 and the decree in O.S.No.491 of 1998 passed by the Court of I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District are null and void and for consequential reliefs. The respondents herein are the defendants in the suit. Respondents 5 and 6 on the other hand filed O.S.No.312 of 2008 in the same Court almost for the same relief in respect of the same property. The petitioner herein was shown as defendant No.5 in that suit. It is stated that till recently, both the suits were being heard by the Court of I Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District. It appears that in the recent past, O.S.,No.312 of 2008 was made over to the Court of IX Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District and O.S.No.516 of 2006 to the Court of Special Judge for S.C./S.T (P.O.A)-cum-Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District. This Transfer C.M.P. is filed with a prayer to transfer O.S.No.312 of 2008 to the Court of Judge for S.C./S.T (P.O.A)-cum-Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. From a comparison of the plaints in both the suits, copies of which are filed, it is evident that almost similar reliefs are claimed by the petitioner, on the one hand, and respondents 5 and 6 on the other hand, by filing two separate suits. Obviously not being aware of this fact, the suits came to be allotted to different Courts, in the course of balancing the workload. If the suits are heard by different Courts, there is every likelihood of conflicting judgments being rendered on the same issues. Since the allotment was purely an administrative act, the learned Principal District Judge, Ranga Reddy District can take necessary steps to ensure that both the suits are heard by one and the same Court. For this purpose, it is not necessary to issue notice to the respondents in this Transfer C.M.P. Therefore, the Transfer C.M.P. is disposed of, directing the learned Principal District Judge, Ranga Reddy District to take necessary steps to ensure that O.S.Nos.516 of 2006 and 312 of 2008 are heard by one and the same Court and he shall be at liberty to allot both of them to one of the Courts, where the matters are pending, or to a different Court altogether depending upon the workload. Before the record is forwarded to the Court, to which the matters are allotted, the Courts at which the proceedings are pending shall put the parties on notice. There shall be no order as to costs. __________ 21.07.2011 JSU THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Tr.C.M.P.No.428 of 2011 Date: 21.07.2011 JSU