IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 20TH DECEMBER 2010 / 29TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 RCRev..No. 109 of 2006(A) ------------------------------- RCA.40/2003 of DISTRICT COURT, PALAKKAD RCP.66/2001 of ADDL.MUNSIFF COURT, (RENT CONTOLLER), PALAKKAD .................... REVISION PETITIONER/1ST RESPONDENT IN RCA & 1ST RESPONDENT IN THE RCP -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RASEENA, W/O.MUHAMMED ASALAM, PENSION STREET, KOPPAM ASMOM, PALAKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.N.KRISHNANKUTTY ACHAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.K.MOHANA KANNAN RESPONDENT(S)/APPELLANT IN THE RCA & PETITIONER IN THE RCP/2ND RESPONDENT IN THE RCA & 2ND RESPONDENT IN RCP: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ANVAR, S/O.MUHAMMED KASSIM, METTUPALAYAM STREET, KOPPAM AMSOM, PALAKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. BADARUDHEEN, S/O.LATE MEERASA, 17/177, METTUPALAYAM STREET, KAPPAM AMSOM, PALAKKAD. ADV. SRI.K.P.DANDAPANI, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR R2 THIS RENT CONTROL REVISION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & N. K. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ R. C. R. No.109 of 2006 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 20th day of December, 2010 ORDER Pius C. Kuriakose, J It is submitted by Smt.Zohra on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the subject matter of RCR.400/2005 and the subject matter of the present RCR is one and the same. A copy of the judgment in RCR 400/05 is incorporated. Having gone through the judgment, it is found that the building in question is already delivered back to the landlord. We are of the view that nothing survives for consideration in this RCR. Smt.Zohra would now submit that a connected Second Appeal as 136/03 is pending before this Court. In view of that submission, we dispose of this RCR as infructuous observing that this judgment will not cause any prejudice to the contentions of any of the parties in Second Appeal No.136/03. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE N. K. BALAKRISHNAN JUDGE kns/- -2-