IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.86 of 2010 Date of decision:11.03.2010. Dr. N.K.Singla ...Petitioner Versus Dharam Pal Uppal ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Manmohan Singh, Senior Advocate, with Mr. M.P. Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pardeep Bedi, Advocate, for the respondent. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. Learned counsel for the respondent states that he would not press the amendment application Annexure P-6. In the light thereof, issue No.3A, which was framed as a consequence of the allowance of the amendment plea Annexure P-6, will stand deleted. It is further agreed that the petitioner herein (defendant before the learned Trial Court) would be entitled to cross-examine the witnesses already examined by the respondent herein qua the subject of issue No.3-B. In view of the fact that the ejectment petition under adjudication has been filed on an averment of personal necessity and the landlord is aged more than 80 years, the matter shall be listed before the learned Rent Controller tomorrow. The respondent herein and the other witnesses examined by him shall appear before the learned Rent Controller tomorrow itself for being cross- examined on behalf of the petitioner herein qua the subject of issue No.3-B. It is further agreed that the rent petition shall be disposed of by the learned Rent Controller within one month from today. The petitioner herein shall have opportunities to adduce evidence qua issues No.3(b), (c) and (d) in the meantime. Disposed of accordingly. Copy of the order be supplied to the learned counsel for the parties under the signatures of the Special Secretary of this Court. March 11, 2010 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE