THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.405 OF 2000 JUDGMENT: The appellant filed O.P.No.1271 of 1998 in the Court of the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, against the respondents for various reliefs, under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Public Societies Registration Act, 1350 Fasli. His basic grievance was about the alleged mismanagement of the affairs of the first respondent Society. Along with the O.P., he filed as many as five I.As., namely, I.A.Nos.3845 of 1998 to 3849 of 1998. The relief claimed in I.A.No.3846 of 1998 was for grant of injunction restraining the respondents from discharging their duties till a new Managing Committee is formed. The other applications were for the reliefs of declaration of the first respondent’s Managing Committee as defunct; directing the respondents to hold General Body Meeting immediately after conducting elections; abolishing the Governing Council of the Hyderabad Residency Degree College and P.G. Centre, and appointment of a Receiver to look after the management of the Society, till a new Managing Committee is formed. The applications were opposed by the respondents. Through a common order, dated 05.07.1999, the trial Court dismissed all the applications. The present appeal is filed against I.A.No.3846 of 1998. Though it is represented that revisions are filed against the orders in other four applications also, the correct picture is not forthcoming. Heard Sri Manik Rao, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri M.Papa Reddy, learned counsel for the respondents. The appellant claims to be one of the members of the Society. He wanted to grant injunction restraining the respondents from discharging their duties till a new Managing Committee is formed. Grant of such a relief, even in the O.P., after recording of evidence and hearing the parties, itself is somewhat extraordinary. It is just unthinkable to grant injunction restraining the respondents from discharging their duties till a new Managing Committee is formed, as an interim measure, that too, at the instance of one member. Even according to the appellant, the affairs of the first respondent society are managed by the elected committees. In case, the term of the elected committee has expired, steps could have been taken to conduct elections properly. The trial Court has taken a correct view, and dismissed the matter. This Court is not inclined to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the record in the O.P. was sent to this Court. The Registry shall take steps to return the record to the trial Court to enable it to proceed with the trial of the O.P. ________________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J 9th SEPTEMBER, 2009. kvni