CRLR No.1729/2000 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Mr. SC Tyagi, Advocate for the revisionists. Mr. Prabhakar Joshi, Brief Holder for the State. Learned counsel for the revisionist submitted that the instant revision was filed against the summoning order dated 13.5.1999 passed by CJM, Dehradun and against the said order dated 13.5.1999, a protest petition was filed to review the said order, which too was rejected on 31.7.2000 also by CJM, Dehradun, and assailing those orders, the present revision has been preferred. He further submitted that power of review does not vest with the Magistrate and the order of summoning can only be challenged by way of preferring a petition u/s 482 Cr.P.C. He also fairly submitted that in light of the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Adalat Prasad Vs. Rooplal Jindal & others reported in (2004) 7 SCC 338, against the summoning order, revision is not maintainable, and only the petition u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is maintainable. He further submitted that in light of the above-said dictum, this revision has wrongly been filed and hence, the instant revision may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum. Prayer being innocuous, therefore, accepted. In view of the above-said reasons, the present revision is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the revisionist, if he so desires, to avail the appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum. Interim order dated 21.8.2000 is vacated. (D.V., J.) 09.07.2010 Rajeev Dang