IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12058 of 2009 CHANDRA SHILA SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 12.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was appointed as Anganbari Sevika on 2.4.2007 vis-à-vis respondent no. 10, who was denied the same on the ground that her husband was a Government servant, holding the post of Dalpati. Respondent no. 10 questioned the same when the District Magistrate by order dated 19.7.2009 has ruled in favour of Respondent no.10. The petitioner is aggrieved by the same. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no remedy of appeal is available before the Commissioner against the order of the District Magistrate under the guidelines regulating the appointment/termination of Anganbari Sevika as formulated in 2006 and amended in 2008. This aspect of the matter has been considered by this court in CWJC No. 12559 of 2009 in which counsel for the State took the stand that notwithstanding the notification of 2008, an appeal still lies before the Commissioner under the rules of 2006 against the orders of the District Magistrate. This writ application is, therefore, disposed with the observation that if so advised, the petitioner may prefer an appeal against the impugned order. If such appeal is preferred within a 2 period of one month from today, the Court requires to consider the same by a reasoned and speaking order without going into the issue of limitation preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)