IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1107 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1273 of 2009 ====================================================== 1. Mohammed Qayum son of Mohammed Annu, Resident Of Mohall- Ishopur,Police Station-Phulwari Sharif,District-Patna .... .... Appellant/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Home Police Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director General Of Police, Bihar Military Police, Computer Bhawan, Baily Road Patna. 3. The Inspector General of Police, Bihar Military Police, North Zone, 3rd Floor, Pant Bhawan, Ram Charitra Path, Patna. 4. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Bihar Military Police, Veterinary College Compound, Patna. 5. Commandant, Bihar Military Police-3, Tunki Farm, Bodhgaya, District- Gaya 6. Manoj Kumar Thakur, father’s name not known to the petitioner, C/O Commandant, Bihar Military Police-3, Tunki Farm, Bodh Gaya, District- Gaya. .Respondents... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ambarnath Banerjee, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Roy Shivaji Nath, A.A.G.3 with Mr. Ritesh Kumar, A.C. to A.A.G. 3. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 2 08-09-2011 Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 30th June 2011 passed by the learned single Judge in above C.W.J.C. No. 1273 of 2009 the writ petitioner has preferred the present Appeal Patna High Court LPA No.1107 of 2011 (2) dt.08-09-2011 2 under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent. The appellant had applied for employment on the post of Jharukas- Jamadar (Sweeper) in Bihar Military police pursuant to the recruitment process undertaken in the year 1998. It may be noted that in 1998 selection the appellant was not found suitable. Pursuant to the representation made by the appellant and the order dated 7th March 2005 made by this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 6608 of 2000; his claim was again considered and rejected on 10th September 2005. The appellant did not challenge the said order of 10th September 2005 and the same has attained finality. Pursuant to a fresh selection process initiated in 2008 one Manoj Kumar, respondent no.6, was found suitable and was appointed on the post of Jharukas- Jamadar on 21st June 2008. The said appointment was challenged by the appellant in above C.W.J.C. No. 1273 of 2009. According to the appellant, the appointment of respondent no. 6 is vitiated on the ground of favoritism and nepotism. The petition was contested by the respondents. Counter affidavit was filed. The appellant did not apply for appointment pursuant to advertisement no. 1 of 2008. In earlier selection process he was not found suitable. In view of the above undisputed facts the learned single Judge has rejected the writ petition. We agree with the learned single Judge. No case for interference is made out. Appeal is dismissed limine. B Tiwary/- (R.M. Doshit, CJ) (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)