1 447n J 91 Pl eltN0A753 of 2003 1 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSANoA753 of2003 DateofDecisionl 28052010 1 DrAnupAbrol Appellant 0 Vs Cno I Ram Murti 8 Anr lespondents C5 I CORAM HONBLE MRJUSTICE VINOD KSHARMA 0 I Presentl MrICSOadwal Advocate for the a5 MtMlSarin SrAdvocat 4dN82 e with Mrlllitin Sarin Advocate 7 Nol MiSCPipat SrAdvocate with tl Advocate for No2 Vinod KSharmaJ lhis is defendants appealagainstthe j and decree dated bythelearned courtsbelow vide which the suit for permanentinjuilctiotl lleld by the restraining the defendantsfroin interfering iil thc of the plaintiffover any part ofthe propertystanclsdismissed . Radhika 2012.07.09 16: 01 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 448n eR NoA753 of2003 2 Theappeal is byDrAnupAbrol son ofRajinder Nath his iandlord Thelearnedcourts belowhaverecordeda concurrent findingof fact that DrAnup Abrol was inductedas a tenant by No l and his eviction wasorderedbythe leamedRent Controller on account ofnor 1 1 of rent and also for the reasons that he had denied the title of his 0 landlord 0 Leamedcounsel for the Appellant contendsthat this appeal I C5 raisesthe followingsubstantial of laws for considerationof this I COUl Z 1 Whetherthe and decree passedby the leaned courts below is perverseand as PunjabWakf Board was I the owner or the propertyand therefore the plaintiffl 08 was not entitled to againsttrue 00 e owner2 awa Z ln supportof the substantialquestionof law leamed counsel for the contendsthat the Slllt propertywasunder the of PunjabWakf Board and therefote the suit for injunction againstthe true owner was not cotnpetentwhereas vvasentitled toprotecthis This pleaof the leamed counsel for the appellantcannot be accepted Ram Murti was inducted as a tenant bythe PunjabWakfBoard . Radhika 2012.07.09 16: 01 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 449n r eGBo4753 of 2003 3 his tenancywas terminatcdEven a true owner hasno rightto interferein of thetenant exceptin due processof law In any case the hasno locus standito maintainthisappeal as he was the tenant who deniedthe title ofhis landlordand also failed to paythe rent and was orderedto be evicted The landlord ofthe m t hasalsobeenorderedto be evictedvide orderof even datepassed in RSA 0 No2578 of 2002 titledMls Ram Mutti c Sonsand Anr Vs PunjabWakf 0 Board Ors I C Substantial of Iaw raised is answered againstthe I Z t 8nding no meritm this appeal it is orderedto be dismissed I Vinod KSharmal 08 2800502010 Judge m rp en Z 4 5 0 eJl 1 5 . Radhika 2012.07.09 16: 01 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document