1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6633/2010 Prof. P.L. Swarnkar & Ors. vs. University of Rajasthan & Anr. Date of order : 10/5/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Tejasvi Sharma for the petitioners. ****** Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the respondent- University has in terms of University Ordinance 376.F have given re-employment to Dr. N.K. Sharma, Dr. Beena Mathur, Dr. Kamla Garg and Dr. P.C. Jain, who attained the age of superannuation respectively on 27.1.2010, 7.2.2010, 6.1.2010 and 9.1.2010. Although learned counsel submits that this re- employment would be valid only upto 30.6.2010, but lot of work has remained incomplete and if similar treatment is accorded to the petitioners, this would facilitate in completion of such work. Learned counsel referred to orders Annexures-3, 4 and 5 dated 9.2.2010, 5.4.2010 and 30.1.2010 where on the basis of interim order of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14533/2009, Dr. Nagendra 2 Bhardwaj & Ors. vs. University of Rajasthan & Anr. Decided on 4.12.2009, the respondents have given reemployment to the above referred to Professors who retired and yet re-employed upto 30.6.2010, but in the case of petitioners, they have not accorded similar treatment. Having regard to the orders passed by the respondents in the case of various other persons, I deem it appropriate to make a suitable representation to the Vice Chancellor of the University of Rajasthan, who shall take a final view about giving reemployment to the petitioners and pass appropriate order within a period of one week from the date such representation is made before it, keeping in view the arguments aforesaid, as to why similar treatment was not accorded to the petitioners. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/