1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIL. WRIT PETITION NO. 520 OF 2011. Rukhmini Ganpatrao Gitte (Munde) ..vs.. The State of Mah. through P.S.O.Navegaonbandh, Distt.Gondia and anr. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr. N.S.Khandewale, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr. R.S.Nayak, APP for respondent no.1. C ORAM : P.V.HARDAS AND S.B.DESHMUKH, JJ. DATED : 14th OCOTBER, 2011. The petitioner, by this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, prays for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent no.1 to register an offence against the accused named in the said complaint for offences punishable under Sections 327, 354, 506 B of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has pointed out to us that the contentions of the petitioner is that “A” summary has been submitted by the Police Officer and secondly, according to the learned APP, aforesaid relief would not be available to the petitioner. In the light of the fact that ‘A’ summary has been 2 submitted by the police, the relief which the petitioner has prayed for, cannot be granted to the petitioner. The petitioner may contest the ‘A’ summary proceedings, if pending before the learned Magistrate and also may avail the alternate remedy available to the petitioner in law. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE. chute