HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 2398 OF 2010 Friday, the Second day of July, Two Thousand and Ten Between Sri Dhananjay N. Chouhan Petitioner AND Sri V.Pranav Kumar and another Respondents THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 2398 OF 2010 ORAL ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed by the decree holder in RC No. 405 of 2002, against the claim petitioner, first respondent herein. The first respondent herein filed EA No. 49 of 2004 to summon the Bailiff who executed the warrant of eviction on 29.11.2004 wrongly to prove the illegal method of the eviction, knowing that the second respondent is his tenant. The case of the petitioner herein before the court below was that the first respondent herein was examined as PW-1 and to fill up the lacunae, though the bailiff report is available on record, seeks to summon the Bailiff. The court below while observing that without examining the Bailiff, the contents of the report cannot be proved, has allowed the petitions. Aggrieved thereby, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. As can be seen from the findings of the court below, the E.P. proceedings are not terminated and without examining the Bailiff, the contents of the report cannot be relied upon. The court below is right in observing that no prejudice will be caused to the petitioner herein by examining the Bailiff. Having gone through the entire material available on record, I do not find any illegality or irregularity in the order impugned. Consequently, the Civil Revision Petition fails and is accordingly dismissed at the stage of admission. No order as to costs. ________________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari July 2, 2010 MAS