In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. CRM.M 19455 of 2009 (O&M) Decided on July 27,2009. Harinder Singh -- Petitioner vs. State of Punjab --Respondent. Present: Mr. Karan Bhardwaj, Advocate,for the petitioner Mrs.Rajni Gupta,Addl.A.G.Punjab. Rakesh Kumar Jain, J: (Oral) The petitioner has applied for anticipatory bail apprehending his arrest in a case registered vide FIR No.42 dated 19.6.2009 under Sections 420,465,468,471 IPC at Police Station, Sadiq, District Faridkot. The allegations contained in the FIR are that on 6.6.2009, the police had taken into custody one Mohindra Pick up jeep bearing No.PB- 03-G-0074 from one Sajjan Singh son of Narain Singh Mehra and from his son Makhan Singh in a case No. 26 dated 28.4.2009 under Sections 457/380/411 IPC registered at Police Station,Sadiq. Makhan Singh gave an application on 17.6.2009 in the Court for custody of the aforesaid jeep on superdari and on 18.6.2009, Registration Certificate of the jeep was submitted which was prepared at Faridkot. On enquiry from District Transport Officer, Faridkot, it was found that the said Registration CRM.M 19455 of 2009 (O&M) -2- Certificate was not issued by that office and Makhan Singh and Sajjan Singh prepared a fake Registration Certificate. Before coming to this Court, the petitioner had applied for anticipatory bail before the Court below, which was dismissed on 11.7.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the respondent/State has submitted that Baljinder Singh, Sarpanch of the village has made a statement before the police that the petitioners had told him that he took Rs.9000/- from Makhan Singh and gave him forged and fabricated Registration Certificate of the jeep in question. The offence is quite serious and is at the stage of investigation. If the persons like the petitioner and Makhan Singh and Sajjan Singh (non- applicants) can produce fake Registration Certificate in the Court for the purpose of taking case property on superdari, they can go to any extent and there shall be no sanctity to the orders passed by the Court on the basis of the documents produced before it. In view of the above, I do not find it to be a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, his bail application is hereby dismissed. July 27,2009 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge