HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH AT BILASPVR PETmONERS RESPONDENTS WRTT PETmON No. 2246 of2006 : 1. Smt. Sahodra Bai ISiumijan Wd/o Late Shri Ram Lal Bhumijan, aged abouf 38 yea-s, by caste Gwid, resident of viUage Dansara, TahsU Sarangarh Distriet Raigarh (CG) 2. Jai Prakash Bhumijan S/o Kanita Prasad Bhumijan now adopted aan of Smt. Sahodra Bai Bhumijan, aged aboirt 21 years, t^ caste Gond, resident of village Dansafa, Tahsil Sarangarh District Raigarh (C.d) VERSU8 : 1. The State of Chhattisgarii, Tt ou^|t the Secretary Department of Sehool Educatioa, Mantralaya, D.K.8. Building, Raipur (C.O.) 2. The Director, PubKc fastnKtians, Chhattisgaih, Raipur, Tahsit and District Raipur(CG) 3. The Collector, Raigarii, Tahsil and Distriet Raigarh(C») 4. District Education OfiBcer, Raigarh, Distritd Raigarh(CG) 5. Block Educatimi Officer, Sarangarh, District Kaiearii(CO) WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226Q27 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDJA ' ' , ' :* . ;:f SB: Hon'ble Stari Satish K. AenUtutd. J. Preseirt: Smt. Mala Dubev. Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Sunita Jain, Pacel Lawyerforthe State;/respondents. -2- ORALORUER (Passed on 23" day of July, 2008) 1. I.A No. 4913 of2006. This is an application fw amendment in the writ petitiun. The application is disnussed as not pressed. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for tiie petitioners sulanits tfaat fee petitioners do not want to contest the matter on merits itf liiis stage. Leamed counsel farther prays that Ihe respondent aulhcutties may be .directed to considered and deeided the applicaticai' dated 29.03.2006 (Annexure P/4), pending befere the respondent No. 4 ia acewdance with law, as expeditiously as possible. 3. Ms. Jain, leamed Paiel Lawyer for the State/respondents subnuts that fhere is no reason asto why the application, as stated above, should not be considered and decided in accordance with law. 4. In view ofthe foregoing, Ihis petition is disposed ofwith a drection to tfae respondent-aulfaorities to consider and decide Ifae above-stated application ofthe petitioners, in accordance witfa law, on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible, preferably wtthin a period of six weeks fi-om the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis Qrder. No ordw wto costs. Anrit Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge