IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 19348 of 2008 Between: Sri Maharshi Harijana Labour Contract Cooperative Society Limited, Arundhathi Nagar, Atlloor Mandal, Kadapa District, Rep. by its President S. Pechalaiah, S/o. Munaiah, Aged about 35 years, R/o. S.C. Colony, Atloor "X" Roads, Atloor Mandal, Kadapa District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Selection Committee, Social Welfare Department, Rep. by its Chairman-Cum-Joint Collector, Kadapa District. 2 Bharath Security Services, Rep. by its President Siva Reddy, R/o. 12/430-A, Maruthi Nagar, Kadapa Town and District. 3 Rayalaseema Yuvajana Seva Sangham, REp. by its President Amuri Baldas, Aged about 45 years, R/o. Yerramukkapalli, Kadapa Town and District. 4 House Industrial Security Services, Rep. byits President Shaik Shamsuddin, Aged about 35 years, Kogatam Village, Kamalapuram Mandal, Kadapa District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in selecting respondent No.2 to 4 in the manner of nomination for entrustment of out sourcing work for the Hostels in the Social Welfare Department, Kadapa though the respondent No.2 to 4 are not having the qualiﬁcations and even without negotiating with all the tenderers including the petitioner society as illegal, unjust, arbitrary, highhanded, discriminative, unilateral and consequently set aside the selection of respondent No.2 to 4 for the entrustment of out sourcing work for the Hostels in the Social Welfare Department, Kadapa in pursuance of the 1st respondent short tender notiﬁcation No. A4/95/2008 dated 07- 08-2008 with further direction to consider the application of the Petitioner society along with others as per the tender conditions. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.L.J.VEERA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4:MR. V.ESWARAIAH CHOWDARY The Court made the following : ORDER: No representation on behalf of the petitioner. It indicates that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution at the admission stage. No costs. ________________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date:14th October, 2008. cs ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RLD}