1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION AO No. 699 of 2006 SHRI DATTATRAY RAMCHANDRA ... Appellant V/S THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GR. MUMBAI .. Respondent SHRI. KISHOR PATIL with PRVIN G. SAWANT for appellant MRS. GEETA JOGLEKAR for BMC. CORAM: D. G. KARNIK J. DATE: 13th November 2006 P.C.: 1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant states that in pursuance of an undertaking given to the court on 18th September 2006 the appellant has removed the unauthorized structure. Learned counsel for the respondent states that the concerned officer has visited the suit premises and has orally reported that the structure has been removed. In view of this no further orders are necessary. Appeal is disposed of. Appellant through his advocate undertakes to withdraw the suit filed in the City Civil Court. (D.G. KARNIK J.) 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil application no. 942 of 2006 in AO No. 699 of 2006 SHRI DATTATRAY RAMCHANDRA ... Appellant V/S THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GR. MUMBAI .. Respondent SHRI. KISHOR PATIL with PRVIN G. SAWANT for appellant MRS. GEETA JOGLEKAR for BMC. CORAM: D. G. KARNIK J. DATE: 13th November 2006 P.C.: In view of the dismissal of the appeal, this civil application does not survive and is disposed of accordingly. (D.G. KARNIK J.)