vks 1 ABA 176 OF 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.176 OF 2011 Rakesh Trilokinath Shukla .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ..Respondents Mr. M. K. Kocharekar, with Mr. Anil S.Mishra, for the Applicant. Mrs. A. A. Mane, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM: R. C. CHAVAN, J. DATED : 3rd March, 2011. P.C.: 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail by a person who is alleged to have received a sum of Rs.35,00,000/- from sale of flat constructed in partnership with the complainant. Civil Suit is already pending. Learned counsel for the applicant states that though the applicant has not cheated the complainant, in order to show his bonafides, without prejudice to his rights and contentions, he would would deposit the sum of Rs.35,00,000/- which he is alleged to have received and which is in dispute, vks 2 ABA 176 OF 2011 within a period of four weeks before the learned trial Court. In view of this applicant's being in custody for the purpose of investigation may not be necessary. The application is therefore, allowed. In the event of applicant's arrest in CR NO.8 of 2010 registered at Nalla Sopara Police Station, District : Thane, he be released on bail on his furnishing PR Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate sum of Rs.25,000/- on the conditions that the applicant would deposit a sum of Rs. 35,00,000/- before the learned Trial Court, within a period of four weeks, which amount the learned trial Court shall invest in any nationalized bank to earn maximum interest and shall deal with the same at the end of trial as per result of trial. 2. If the applicant fails to deposit the money with the trial Court by pay order before scheduled date and even if amount is not credited in the account of learned trial Court, by that date, the order shall stand cancelled. i) The applicant shall make himself available on 7th vks 3 ABA 176 OF 2011 March, 2011 for interrogation by Investigating Officer and thereafter as and when required Investigating Officer. ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the trial Court. iv) The order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if chargesheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre -vs- State of Maharashtra and ors, in S.L.P No.7615 of 2009. v) The application stands disposed of. (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)