MC 828/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA. Heard Mr. J.I. Borbhuiya, learned counsel for the applicant-writ petitioner as w ell as Ms A. Verma, learned Standing Counsel, Finance Department. By means of this application, the petitioner has prayed for a direction to the r espondents to keep one post of Assistant Audit Officer vacant. While entertainin g the writ petition by order dated 4.3.2011, it was provided that the appointmen t to the post of Assistant Audit Officer, which is the subject matter of challen ge in the writ petition, shall be subject to the final outcome of the writ petit ion. In view of the above, no further order can be passed by way of directing the res pondents to keep one post vacant for the petitioner. Once the interim matter was considered and the order was passed on 4.3.2011, it was not open for the petiti oner to file another Misc. Case praying for keeping one post vacant for him. In my considered opinion, this is the abuse of the process of law. Misc. Case is dismissed.