^I^^Ll-a ^l^a^Vtl'' c ^-vc^ 2-— (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. i^ 3>/2007 PETITIONER ^^. : ^s°-,Smt.Lissy Rey /' i> K.'o.A' .^-•'^6/ >y ..<• SS?; ..••' W/o Dr. M. G. Raymon Aged about44 years, AssistantTeacher, Govt. Primary School, Kohka No. 1, Bhilai, Block - Bhilai, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) VERSUS -Jo^^ /y^ ^^ .-••' RESPONDENTS -o"A. ''^ '^^y /^v ^ y ,1. StateofChhattisgarh Through:- Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3.. District Education Officer Distt. - Durg (C.G.) 3. BlockEducationOfficer Block - Bhilai, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) |MM;S^%, ^-."•U'^'L ^ ^ 11 V,. *j; WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA f^^fiL il^ „. [chn.i'"-^' petitioner most humbly submit as under:- HI6HCOURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P.fS) No. 453 of 2007 Petitioners : Smt. Ussy Roy Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and others SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agmhatn. J Present: Mr. S.IC Thomas, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Satidi Supta, t>y. 6ovt. Advocate for respondents/State. ORDER (Passed on this 20th Day of February, 2007) 1. The petitioner wus nppointed vide order dated 22.12.88 (P/l) as Assistant Teacher on fixed poiy scale of Rs. 300/-. After completion of one yeou- probation, she was granted regutar pay scale of Rs. 545-950/-. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner ajbmits -that the issue mvolved in the case is asto whether, the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or after comptetion of probation period. 3. The issue involved, herein was considered by the Madhya Practedi State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu oaid 56 others Vs. State of M.P. & others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated teadiers ure entitled to regu\ar pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial dppointment. The matter was taken-up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to •the effect that the Teadiers/Assistflnt Teachers are entitled to regutar pay scale from ckite of initial appointment. 4. Leamed counsel q)pearing for the petitioner furl'her submits that •this Court, while considering the some issue in Sushil Tiwari A others Vs. State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh & others (W.P. (5) No.5976 of 2(X)6) by order dated 7-11-2006, has granted regutar pay scale w.e.f. the date of initkil appointment. 5. Leamed counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that this case is squarely covered by the decision of this Cwjrt in the case of Sushil Tiwari & others Vs. State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh A others (Supro). Thakur 6. In view of that this petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnibotri Judge