^' 'l 75 COURT OF JUDICATURE : : S.R. NAYAK, C.J. WRiT PETJTION N0.1945 OF 2005 versus 1. 2. 3. Shri GopaJji Trust, Beiadula, Through: San/arakara Mahant, Ramgopa! Das Ralgarh (C.G.) State ofChhattJsgarh, Through: Collector, Raigarh Registrar Pubjic Trust, Sub Djvisionai Office, Raigarh, (C.G.). Muriidpal Corporation Raigarh, Through: Commissioner, Munjcipai Corporation Office, Raigarh (C.G.5. : Mr. Amlt Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Prashant Mishrs, learned Addl. Advocate GeneraS, w'rth Mr. Vlvek Ranjan Tlwari, Searned counsel for the respodnents. on 20 January, 2006) In this wrjt petitlon the complaint of the petltioner - Trust is that of Its comprteing In Plot No.56, -57, 229 to 24S and 301 to 303 In City has been used by the Munidpat Corporation of Ralgarh, the thlrd respondent hereln, for road widenina purpose without acquiring the same either under the provteions ofthe Land Acqussition Act, 1894 or any other Qnabting ^tatute. tt is n@edl©ssto that if tho land of the petitloner - Trust Is required by the third respondent for -any pubilc it has to acquire the jand by method and pay compensation to the ov/ner of the land. In that of the matter, the Court had issued '6 /o 8 Bln notice to the respondente» Mr. Prashant Mlshra, teamed Senior Couns^J and Advocate Generaj, who for No.3 from 1 and 2, on instructions, sybmjtted that it is true that a part of the above land beionglng to the petjtloner - Trust has been used for widening purpose the Trust wiil be appropriat-e compensation in accordance with iaw after measuring aotua} extent of land used and demarcating the same. The above undertaksng is placed on recora6. In that view of the matter, 1 aEo not think it necessary to take any further in this writ petition. The writ is accordingly of to the above undertaklng of the second respondent. Nocosts. —- Sd/- Chief Justice 1 ill II BS