IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14534 of 2010 ARVIND PASWAN & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 15.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are languishing in jail since 30.12.2009 in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 435, 395, 386 of the I.P.C., Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act. Though F.I.R. was lodged against unknown but the petitioners' name subsequently sprang up when the petitioners confessed their guilt in another case in which they are also involved but nothing has been recovered from the petitioners nor the petitioners have been put on T.I. Parade. This contention of the petitioners has not been controverted by the learned counsel for the State. Considering the fact that no direct material has come against the petitioners neither any recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioners nor they have been put on T.I. Parade, let the petitioners Arvind Paswan and Sanjay Dangi be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- 2 (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Sherghatti at Gaya in connection with Gurua P.S. Case No. 96 of 2009 corresponding to G.R. No. 1050 of 2009. Keeping in view that the petitioners are also involved in one another similar kind case, let the trial court consider to cancel the bail of the petitioners if the petitioners fail to appear on three consecutive dates or they get themselves involved in similar kind of case. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)