hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 29 OF 2010 IN PIL NO. 258 OF 2009 Gangadhar Annappa Bhosale and Ors. ... Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. R .K. Singh for Petitioners. Mr. A.H. Palekar, A Panel Counsel for R. No. 1. Mr. A.S. Rao for R. No. 3. Mr. Subodh S. Kurdukar for R. No. 11. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : MARCH 03, 2010 P.C. Petition was dismissed on 7.1.2010 after considering the averments in the petition and considering that it was in the realm of contract. This is an application for recall of the order on the ground that the advocate was not present. The Petition was not dismissed because advocate was not present. Petition was dismissed because in our opinion, in the matters of contract such PILs are not maintainable. Hence, Application rejected. (J.H. BHATIA,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)