IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.169 of 2009 BINOD KUMAR CHAUDHARY, S/O SHIBU CHAUDHARY R/O VILLAGE-POKHRAM, P.S. BIRAUL, DISTRICT- DARBHANGA. -PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE-CUM-INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, PATNA. 2. THE ZONAL INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, DARBHANGA ZONE, DARBHANGA. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DARBHANGA. 4. THE OFFICER INCHARGE, BIRAUL POLICE STATION, DISTRICT-DARBHANGA. 5. RANJIT KUMAR CHAUDHARY, 6. SANJIT KUMAR CHAUDHARY, 7. SONU KUMAR CHAUDHARY, 8. SITARAM CHAUDHARY, RESPONDENTS NO.5 TO 8 ARE SONS OF RAMAKANT CHAUDHARY. 9. RAMAKANT CHAUDHARY, S/O LATE MOTILAL CHAUDHARY ALL RESPONDENTS NO.5 TO 9 ARE R/O VILLAGE POKHRAM, P.S. BIRAUL, DISTRICT-DARBHANGA. -RESPONDENTS 3 28.04.2009 The complaint of the petitioner is that at his instance Biraul P.S. Case 126 of 2008 was registered against respondents no.5 to 9 under Sections 307, 341, 323, 324, 379 and 504 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He was under treatment and the Police is not arresting the accused and they are moving freely. In the counter affidavit it is stated that if the petitioner files a representation before the authority the Police will give necessary security to him. It is 2 also submitted that the Superintendent of Police has directed the concerned Investigating Officer to apprehend the accused persons. In the aforesaid circumstances, respondent no.3, the Superintendent of Police, Darbhanga, is directed to over see the investigation and see that steps are taken to apprehend the accused and also to see that investigation is conducted properly. If the petitioner makes a representation for police protection that should be considered by the respondents no.3 and 4 and necessary action should be taken. With the above direction, the petition is disposed of. (J.B. Koshy, CJ.) AAhmad