IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN TUESDAY, THE 10TH MAY 2011 / 20TH VAISAKHA 1933 WP(C).No. 13160 of 2011(T) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- T.M.MAKKAR, THACHALAYIL HOUSE, KIZHAKEKKARA, MUVATTUPUZHA.P.O., ERNAKULAM DIST. BY ADVS. SRI.K.RAVEENDRAN SRI.P.K.ABDUL RAHIMAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ THE SECRETARY, MUVATTUPUZHA MUNICIPALITY, MUVATTUPUZHA.P.O, MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686661 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.K.MOHANAN, J. ---------------------------------------------- W.P(C) No.13160 of 2011 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of May, 2011 JUDGMENT The grievance of the petitioner is that though he had preferred Ext.P2 before the respondent, the same has not been so considered so far and no orders are passed. Ext.P2 is preferred against the errection of mobile tower in Kizhakkekara ward of the respondent municipality. 2. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, and in the light of the contention raised by the petitioner, I am of the view that the writ petition can be disposed of directing the respondent to consider Ext.P2. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider Ext.P2 on merit and pass appropriate orders, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment, which will be produced by the petitioner and the respondent is also directed to maintain status- quo, till disposal of Ext.P2. This writ petition is disposed of, accordingly. Sd/- V.K.MOHANAN JUDGE //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE krj