IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 28TH OCTOBER 2008 / 6TH KARTHIKA 1930 RP.No. 1120 of 2008() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.19893/2008 Dated 23/09/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -------------------------------- ABDUL KADER, S/O.VEERAN KUTTY, MAKKUMTHODI HOUSE, PERINTHALMANNA AMSOM DESOM, NARANGAKUNDU, PERINTHALMANNA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON RESPONDENT(S): --------------- KADEEJA, D/O.MOIDUTTY, CHEMBAN KUNNAN HOUSE, PERINTHALMANNA AMSOM DESOM, PERINTHALMANNA TALUK. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.Raman & T.R. Ramachandran Nair, JJ. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Review Petition No.1120/2008 in W.P.(C) No.19893/2008 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 28th day of October, 2008. O R D E R Raman, J. We dismiss the review petition as we do not find sufficient reason to review the judgment. In the review, however, it is contended that the court below passed an order on 16/05/2008 requiring the petitioner to deposit the entire amount on or before 30/05/2008 and the time granted was hardly sufficient to raise the funds. But the petitioner did not move the court below seeking enlargement of time. 2. However, this will not stand in the way of the petitioner moving the court below for enlargement of time for compliance of the order, since there is already an attachment of the property and it is ordered to be lifted only on condition, no prejudice should be caused to the other side. Subject to the right of the petitioner to move the court below, this review petition is closed. (P.R. Raman, Judge.) (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms