1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5948 OF 2008 Madhukar Vitthal Patil ..Petitioner. Vs. Superintendent Engineer and others ..Respondents. .... Mr. Anant Vadgaonkar for the Petitioner. Ms. Neeta Karnik for Respondents 1 and 2. Mr. S.A. Patil, AGP for Respondent No.3. .... CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 17th November, 2008. P.C. : The order promoting the Petitioner to the post of Mukadam which was passed on 28th May, 1998 specifically stipulates that the promotion was on a temporary basis for a period of six months. Besides that there was a further stipulation that the order would be liable to be revoked in the event that there was any direction from the higher authorities or if any objections were taken to the seniority list. Since the promotion of the Petitioner was purely on a temporary basis in a work charge establishment, the Industrial Court was not in error in dismissing the complaint of unfair labour practices. The Industrial 2 Court has also observed that the case of the Petitioner for promotion shall be considered in due course in accordance with the promotion rules. In these circumstances, no case for interference under Article 226 has been made out. The Petition is dismissed. *****