IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5107 of 2011 RAMESHWAR RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 29.03.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the Panchayat Sewak is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 406, 409, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged against the petitioner that he was entrusted the soaling work but it appears that the work was not completed nor the money to the tune of Rs. 1,37,500/- were returned. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the work was done and deliberately the investigating officer has not brought on record the measurement book. The aforesaid case was instituted on 17.10.2002, charge sheet was submitted on 15.05.2010 and cognizance was taken on 11.06.2010. Even the charge sheet reflects that the measurement book was taken into consideration by the investigating agency. 2 In the circumstances, let petitioner deposit Rs. 50,000/- before the learned court below within a period of three months from today which will be invested in some fixed deposit scheme which will be subject to result of the case. On deposit the alleged amount by the petitioner within a period of three months from today, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Kesaria P.S. Case No. 160 of 2002 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M.Ist Class, Motihari, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)