IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.750 of 2010 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2.THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY EDUCATION GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3.THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BEGUSRAI. 4.THE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, BEGUSRAI. 5.THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, BEGUSRAI. 6.BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, DANDARI, DISTRICT BEGUSRAI. 7.BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, BLOCK DANDARI, DISTRICT BEGUSRAI. 8.THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT BANK, BLOCK DANDARI, DISTRICT BEGUSRAI. --------RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS. Versus MADHUBANI KUMARI, DAUGHTER OF SIYARAM SHARMA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE TETRI, P.S. BALLIA, DISTRICT BEGUSRAI. -----------------------PETITIONER/RESPONDENT. ----------- 2 22-04-2010 I.A. No.3974 of 2010. This is an application for condonation of delay of 333 days. We have heard Mrs. Sunita Kumari, learned counsel for the State. Before adverting to the issue of notice on the question of limitation, we thought it apt to address on merits of the case. 2 In this appeal assail is to the order dated 15.4.2009 passed by the learned Single Judge in C.W.J.C. No.15572 of 2008. On a perusal of the order passed by the learned Single Judge it is perceptible, the learned Single Judge had directed the respondents to arrive at that conclusion by a reasoned and speaking order but only after giving an opportunity to the petitioner. In view of aforesaid, no adverse order has actually been passed against the appellant. Accordingly, we do not find any merit in this appeal and hence, there is no justification to issue notice on the question of limitation. In the result, application for condonation of delay stands rejected and as an inevitable corollary the appeal shall also stand dismissed. (Dipak Misra, C.J.) Abhay Kumar ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)