IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BIL'ASPUR. ‘CHHATTISGARH ; “NV wRIT PETITION No. ;q¢7 ’0F2M3 @ - / VPETITIONER Gopiram Agrawa1, aged about 75 yeafs, Prdprietor Durga Oi1 M111, S/o Late Shri Durga Prasad Agrawa1;Vresident of Thana Road, Distritt Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) Versu s / RESPONDENT My 1.5tate of Chhattisgarh_through the‘C011ectorJ District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) 2.The Rent Contro11ing Authority,‘Raigarh, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) i3.Smt. 5&raswati Devi, widow of MadhO‘Prasad, resident of Sadar Bazar, Raigarh, District Raigarh (Chh E wRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2 6/2 7 OF TH ‘ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA { aw”- XI-HC-22 W nail; . NpL®§9 [0:1 mm Ccunsa! for fhe pefii‘ioner submifs fhaf‘fhe paificner‘ is a femnf m fhe ma—r‘esideafia§ premises ga-dcwn bebnging 1‘0 fhe respandenf N03 and mm afhar‘ swners name!yMahesh kumar and Kusum Devi. Regponden'? Na.3 moved at} app‘icafion far evici'im .mder Secfmn 23% af €‘he Shha‘h‘isga‘rh Accammeda‘rian Con‘h‘ol Ac? fer ev§afion of fwo shops which was in possession af Harishcha‘nd, bu? Tgfe aufhori?y has pas$ed evicfion decree regardmg pefifionerE go—dawn ds vide arder: dafed 2°1—2003. Ths presenf pa?i§‘ianer was he? par'i‘y To #ha? évicfion pe?ifion, even fhen i‘he karma! §.C.A., FD‘aigar’h has passed qn ord r cf evicfisn agains‘f “me péfh‘iener fram #hé gs=dewn Thg ga—dowa was n 1' gubjecf maffer in fhai‘ pefificn. When #he quesfian was raised fa fhe iea neci ocunsel for ihe pefifiener i‘haf if The ora‘zr was passed again$f The pefi iener in.a case in whieh iha ggmdcwn was mi a subjec‘.‘ maii‘er‘ 0f ihe pei‘iii n fha‘i‘ Tea wii‘hau‘i‘ making pei'ifisner’ a$ a par-w ‘ra iha‘i‘ iiiigafiori, Thar: hé an approach The comemad Tribunai for V recaHing fha eariief‘ evim‘ien order ar he can approach $he Civi! Caur‘i‘.//” / £53-?»2003 Shri Prasham’ Mishr'a, caunsaal far #he psfificner. @ X—C—22 IH