IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.20 of 2008 1. KUMAR YADAV 2. NARAYAN YADAV 3. BAIJNATH YADAV 4. AWADHESH YADAV 5. DINESH YADAV 6. SHANKAR YADAV 7. PRASADI YADAV 8. ASHOK YADAV …PETITIONES Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. UPENDRA SINGH …OPP.PARTIES ----------- 03. 21.07.2010 Petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 26.11.2007 whereby their application filed under section 227 Cr.P.C. was considered and rejected. It appears that all sections except section 307 IPC are triable by Magistrate. From the impugned order it appears that a submission was made that there is sharp contradiction in evidence which may not justify framing of charge(s). Learned trial court has observed that the contradictionS shall be taken into consideration at the trial. That, by itself, does not justify allowing of the application. It further appears that charges were framed on that date (26.11.2007) itself. This Court does not find any patent illegality in the impugned order. The application is accordingly dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )