7 w^fl C ^liJQ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No.S/-3 /200^- PETITIONER h^\.^ .. <0.-3-''^v' ...••' A' 'O^^-V..-'"''' ^w ^n^- ^•' I^'SPONDENTS Dindayal Choudhaiy S/o Late Shri KunJ Ram Choudhary Aged about 40 years Asslstant Teacher Govt. Higher Secondary School Tarkela Block Ralgarh Distt. Raigarh [C.G.] VERSUS 1.^- State of Chhattlsgarh ^' Through: Secretaiy Department of Educatlon, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director, Public instruction, D.K.S. Bhawan, Ralpur (C.G.) 3. Jolnt Dlrector, ^ F'ublic InstrucUon Divlslon, Raigarh (C.G.) District Education Officer Ralgarh (C.G.) Block Educatlon Offlcer Block Saranggarh Distt. Raigarh 6, Principal Govt. Higher Secondary ' School Tarkela Block-Ralgarh Distt. Riagarh [C.G.] WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRTTSAND DIRECTIONS r XI-HC-78 3^ •^WM-'i, S'TTld'IS, (slCII+iy __ («j.ftC^^<?-i^"sl^_ iTPT^TTgTETra? """•"'••••••"""WT 2007 sn^r^iri^TW (raT311^1si)t| ^- ^•' e.- Bdblu ^' .\x Sllcts'i 4atn (li^(^Giq]ST) g?OTgTHl?(T3n^T 22.1.2007 Mr. S.K. 6uha, Adv^cate for the petitfoners. Mrs. Anju Ahuja, re^»ondents/5tate. With the consent rwrtters ore. heard finally writ petition. °hi'iil<-i41-< tiw<nTfffs^t<(«it<ii< ^sri^irsn^T Depu-ty Sovemment Advocute for the of teomed counsel for 1he parties, the and diqaosed of. Common order dic-tfited in W.P. (s) No. 313 of 2007 m open Court-, passed separotely. A copy of this ord^r be pkice on record in other cormected Sd/- SatishK.Ag Judge P.T.O. ^ HI6H COURT W CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (St No. 313 <rf 2007 Petitioner : &indoynl Choudhary Versus Reqiondents : State of Chhattisgarh cnd others And W. P. CS) No. 314 <rf 2007 Petitioner : Uddhav Ldl Patel Versus Reqwndents : Stnte af Chhatfisyirh and o'thers SB: Hon'bfe Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Mr. S.K. 6uha, Advocote for •thepetithaiers. Mrs. Anju Ahuja. Deputy Sovemment Adwcate for the respondenTs/State. ORDER (Passed on 22nd doy of Jcawary, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearir^ for the petitioners as well as teamed Panel Lawyer appearin9 for the respondmts/State jomtly submit that the facts of the present case are similar to that of 'm W. P. 5784 of 2006 (Milip Kam Daharia ond o+hers Vs. State of Chhatl'isgarh and oltiers). which was disposed of vide order dated 27th October, 2006. They further submit that the question of lew involved is also Itie same. 2. Jn v'ww of the above stated submissions made by leamed counsel for the parl'ies, the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of •the ordw dated 27th Octobar, 2006 passed by this Court in W. P. 5784 of 2006. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on record h olher comected writ petition. Sd/- SatishK.Ag Judge r