IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRL.P.NOs.3030 OF 2010 AND 3031 OF 2010. Date:09.04.2010 CRL.P.NO.3030 OF 2010:- Between:- Viswanath Batt @ Karimbithlu Vishru and others ..Petitioners/A-1 to A-3 And The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad and another. .. Respondents And CRL.P.NO.3031 OF 2010:- Between:- Nadukudiyll Jameela and others ..Petitioners/A-1 to A-3 And The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad and another. .. Respondents COMMON ORDER:- These two petitions are filed by the accused Nos.1 to 3 for quashing proceedings in C.C.Nos.12 of 2005 and 300 of 2004 on the file of Additional Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Gudivada and Additional Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Chirala respectively relating to offences under Sections 406, 420 read with 34 I.P.C. The matter pertains to business transactions between the accused and the respective defacto complainants. 2. It is stated by the petitioners’ counsel that the matter is settled between the accused and the respective defacto complainants and the accused have paid away all the amounts due to the respective defacto complainants and entered into memoranda of understanding with them and that therefore, proceedings in these two cases are liable to be quashed. 3. For recording of compounding of offences, presence of both the parties is necessary and they should admit terms of compromise and the compromise itself. That exercise has to be done in the respective Magistrate Courts. It is pointed out that one of the two offences is a non-compoundable one. It is further pointed out that non-bailable warrants are pending against the accused. 4. In those circumstances, it is for the petitioners to approach the respective Courts with necessary applications under Section 320 Cr.P.C and to get compounding of the offences recorded by the Magistrate Courts in so far as they are compoundable under Section 320 Cr.P.C. Thereafter, it is open to the petitioners to approach this Court with regard to non-compoundable offences. When the petitioners appear before the respective Courts for recording of compounding of offences, the respective Courts will recall non-bailable warrants pending against them because it is reported that the matter is compromised between the parties. 5. Subject to the above observations, both the petitions are dismissed. _​_________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J 9th April 2010 AMD