AO No.55/2009 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, ACJ. This appeal, under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, has been preferred by the appellants-claimants for enhancement of amount of compensation, against the judgment and award dated 24.11.2008 passed by M.A.C.T./District Judge, Haridwar in MACP No. 67 of 2008, Smt. Anita Devi & others vs. Jage Singh & another. Heard Sri Narendra Bali, learned counsel for the appellants and perused the record. Learned counsel for the appellants- claimants has submitted that amount of compensation awarded by learned Tribunal is meager and is liable to be enhanced by this Court. He has further submitted that learned Tribunal committed an error by not awarding interest on the awarded amount of compensation. The learned Tribunal has adopted the factor given in Schedule VI appended to Section 4 of Workmen’s Compensation Act on the minimum wages prevalent at the relevant time. I do not find any illegality and infirmity in the method of calculation of amount of compensation and there is no ground for interference in the payment of amount of compensation awarded by the learned Tribunal. The appellants have not agitated this point that Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. did not deposit the awarded amount within a period of 60 days as directed by the learned Tribunal. In this background of the case, I find no substance in the argument advanced by learned counsel for the appellants-claimants that learned Tribunal has committed mistake by not awarding the interest. In view of the above, appeal lacks merit and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed in limine. (B.C.K., ACJ) 03.03.2009 SP