IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10471 of 2011 Shiv Shankar Prasad Versus Arun Kumar Prasad @ Bablu ----------- 02. 05.07.2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ application has been filed against the order dated 24.05.2011, 25.05.2011, Annexure-4, whereby the learned Court below has refused to direct the plaintiff-respondent to file the earlier lease deeds. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the earlier lease deeds are in possession of the petitioner but intentionally he has not filed the same in the Court. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the plaintiff No.1 stated before the Court below that the previous lease deeds are traceless. The learned Court below also found that some of the lease deeds executed between parties were registered and, therefore, liberty has been granted to the petitioner to prove the certified copy of those lease deeds. In view of the above facts, I am not inclined to interfere in writ jurisdiction. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. Sanjeev/- (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)