1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7433 OF 2009 Ramdayal s/o Murlidhar Rathi & another .. PETITIONERS VERSUS Chandrakant s/o Venkaytesh Belapurkar & another .. RESPONDENTS Mr. A.S. Bajaj, Advocate for the petitioner. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 12 th November, 2009 PER COURT : Challenge raised by the petitioners is in respect of order passed below exh. 39 in Regular Civil Suit no. 473/2000 thereby rejecting the application tendered by the petitioners / third party for their impleadment in the suit. Trial court after considering the contentions raised by the contesting parties, turned down the application. Considering the interlocutory nature of the proceeding under challenge, it is not a fit case for causing interference in exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition therefore stands rejected. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp7433.09.odt 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.__________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10830 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7433 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar/s orders | and Registrar’s orders | CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 12 th November, 2009 . By this application the petitioner has tendered request for transposition of petitioner no. 2 as he is unwilling to join as petitioner in the petition. For the reasons stated in the application, application deserves to be allowed and the same is accordingly allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’. Necessary amendment to be carried out forthwith. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb / office /wp7433.09.odt