IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7025 of 2011 Rakesh Kumar S/O Ram Babu Singh R/O Vill. Simaria, P.S. Barauni (Chakia), Distt. Begusarai. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Union Of India Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Home Affairs, New Delhi. 2. The Director General Of Police, C.R.P.F., Ministry Of Home Affairs, New Delhi. 3. The Inspector General Of Police, C.R.P.F. Baily Road Patna 4. The Deputy Inspector General Of Police, C.R.P.F., Group Centre Jhaphan, Muzaffarpur, Bihar. 5. The Commander, C.R.P.F., Group Centre Jhaphan, Muzaffarpur, Bihar. 6. The Medical Officer, C.R.P.F., Group Centre Jhaphan, Muzaffarpur, Bihar. ---Respondents. ------- 03 12.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Solicitor General for the respondent Union of India and its officials. Petitioner was an application for the post of constable GD in Central Reserve Police Force ( for short ‘CRPF’). It is the case of the petitioner that he was subjected to physical eligibility test followed by written test whereat he was declared successful. The petitioner was thereafter subjected to medical fitness test on 10.01.2011 whereat he was declared medically unfit as the doctor attending on him found the petitioner hypertensive. As per the rules, he was required to file appeal thereagainst after obtaining a medical fitness certificate in an appropriate format from a Government doctor. It is the case of the petitioner that he got himself medically examined by a Government Doctor of Primary Health Centre, Barauni whereafter he was found medically fit. It is further the case of the petitioner that immediately thereafter he filed appeal on 22.01.2011 2 together with the required fee therefor as well as the medical fitness certificate. It is the stand of the petitioner that the said document was mailed under registered post vide receipt no. RL A 8502. It is contended that till today he has not been summoned to be subjected for his medical fitness by a Review Medical Board. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner filed a representation in this regard before the respondent no.3 ( Inspector General of Police, CRPF, Baily Road, Patna) which remained unattended as a result whereof the petitioner has to knock the doors of this Court. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the pleadings made in the application are not supported by documents. However, if the facts stated therein are correct then the concerned respondent is required to consider and dispose of his representation (Annexure-2) in accordance with law. Having heard the parties and on going through the pleadings made in the writ petition, it appears that the stand of the petitioner is that within the specified period he filed the appeal together with the required fee as well as the medical fitness certificate which remained unattended. The petitioner in these circumstances filed a representation (Annexure-2) before the respondent no.3 which has not till date been responded to. In my view, the petitioner has made out a case for disposal of the present writ petition by the following order:- Let the petitioner file a detailed representation before the respondent no.3 ( Inspector General of Police, CRPF, Baily Road, 3 Patna) along with a copy of the present order within a period of 03 weeks from today whereafter said respondent shall consider and dispose of his representation in accordance with law within a period of 04 weeks of its filing. Needless to observe that if facts stated in the application are correct then the respondent is required to arrange a Review Medical Board for the petitioner and take appropriate decision thereafter in accordance with law. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)