1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10920 of 2009 Mr. Shashank B. Kapadia ....Petitioner v/s. Renuka N. Kapadia ....Respondents Mr. P.S.Dani for the petitioner. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR, J DATED:- January 07, 2010. P.C. Heard Counsel for the Petitioner. 2. The grievance of the Petitioner is that the only reason recorded by the trial Court for rejecting the earlier application is that the suit pertain to year 2007 whereas the application was filed in 2008. The trial Court has completely glossed over the main grievance of the Petitioner that in the peculiar facts of the present case, it may be appropriate to expedite the hearing of the suit itself. I 2 find merits in this submission. Instead of issuing notice in the present Petition, as the relief claimed in the application Exhibit 12 is only for expediting the hearing of the suit, the Petition is disposed of with observation that the trial Court may consider of expediting the hearing of the suit, also keeping in mind that the Petitioner is nearing the age of Senior Citizen. 3. Petition disposed of accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)