IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.26334 of 2011 Brajesh Kumar, son of Binju Prasad Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 4. 24.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 25.10.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. 25401 of 2010 since he was identified by the Informant in the Test Identification Parade. The prayer for which has been renewed on the ground of undue delay in trial. A report was called for from the Trial Court which reveals that the delay in trial was attributable mainly to the reason that the co-accused persons were not being produced from Beur Central Jail. The latest position is that the now the charge has been framed. In view of such, I am not inclined to review the earlier order. The prayer for bail is once again rejected. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial preferably on day-to-day basis. The Trial Court (1st Additional Sessions Judge, Saran) is directed to send a list of the witnesses fixing specific dates for production of the witnesses along with a copy of this order in connection with Sessions Trial No. 659 of 2009 arising out of Doriganj P.S. Case No. 57 of 2009, to the Superintendent of Police, Saran at Chapra, and the 2 Superintendent of Police, Saran at Chapra, is directed to ensure production of the witnesses on the date so fixed by the Trial Court so that there is no further delay in trial. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)