IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.10010 of 2011 Date of decision: 12.07.2011 Majhi Transport Co. Regd. Patiala ....Petitioner Versus State Transport Appellate Tribunal Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. P.S. Bawa, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.C. Goyal, Addl. A.G., Punjab. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that since original permit was granted to respondent No.3 vide order dated 2.6.1997 and life of permit was only five years, which stood expired on 2.6.2002, therefore, present petition has been rendered infructuous. He further states that transport authorities cannot grant permanent permit on the monopoly route against the scheme in view of Section 104 of the Motor Vehicles Act. He further states that petitioner shall also move fresh application for grant of permit for the route in question, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition to avail such legal remedies which are available to the petitioner. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (Alok Singh) Judge July 12, 2011 R.S.