bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1999 OF 2009 Lavanya Holdings and Trading Pvt. Ltd. ..Appellant Vs. Income Tax Officer 3(2)(1), Mumbai ..Respondent Mr.J.D.Mistry with Mr.Raj Darak for appellant. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for respondent. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE : 7TH OCTOBER, 2009 P.C. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. Perused appeal. 2. By consent of parties, dispensing with the reasons in support of the impugned order, without examining the merits and/or demerits thereof, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Tribunal for consideration afresh, since some of the issues raised and argued have not been considered by the Tribunal. 3. In the result, the impugned order is set aside. The matter is restored to the file of the Tribunal for consideration afresh. All rival contentions on merits are kept open. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)