IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 21ST JULY 2011 / 30TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 19852 of 2011(F) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- M. MUKUNDA KRISHNAN, MANAGER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SREE THIRUMITTAKODE DEVASWOM, PALAKKAD - 679 535. BY ADV. SRI.MOHAN C.MENON. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2. THE MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY/COMMISSIONER, KOZHIKODE - 673 001. 3. THE COMMISSIONER, MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD, KOZHIKODE - 673 001. R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. L.G. SURESH BABU, R2 & R3 BY ADV. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN,S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/07/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.19852/2011-F: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD. 14/08/2007 IN W.P.(C).NO.24674/2007. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DTD. 10/10/2007 OF THE R.3. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.3. ON 12/10/2007. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.1. THROUGH THE R.3. ON 02/04/2008. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 22/04/2009 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.3. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE PAY FIXATION ORDER STATEMENT REGARDING THE PETITIONER PREPARED ON 13/09/2010. EXT.P.7: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 01/10/2010 SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.3. EXT.P.8: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.3. DTD. 25/04/2011. EXT.P.9: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.3. DTD. 11/05/2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. Prv. C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 19852 OF 2011 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of July, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner is a Grade-II Executive Officer attached to the Malabar Devaswom Board. In view of the order I propose to pass in this Writ Petition I do not think it necessary to narrate the facts in detail. On being aggrieved by the refusal to grant grade promotion with consequential benefits, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P9 representation dated 11.5.2011 before the third respondent. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned standing counsel appearing for respondents 2 and 3. 3. In view of the fact that Ext.P9 is pending before the third respondent, without making any observations as to the merits of the contentions raised in this Writ Petition as also in Ext.P9, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the third respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P9 expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) spc W.P.(C) NO. 2 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. JUDGMENT September, 2010 W.P.(C) NO. 3