IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 5TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 5975 of 2010(V) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ST.MARYS FORANE CHURCH, CHALAKUDY REPRESENTED BY ITS VICAR FR.PIUS CHERAPANATH. BY ADV. SRI.M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM SRI.JYOTHISH.J.KALLINGAL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. CHALAKUDY MUNICIPALITY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CHALAKUDY MUNICIPALITY, CHALAKUDY. 2. THE SECRETARY, CHALAKUDY MUNICIPALITY CHALAKUDY, PIN-680 307. SC FOR R1 SRI. M.P.ASHOK KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.5975 OF 2010 (V) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T Heard both side. 2. It is stated that Ext.P1 building permit was issued to the petitioner for the construction of a Hall with validity period up to 29.10.2009. It is stated that the construction could not be completed and therefore they submitted Ext.P2 application requesting for renewal of the building permit. Orders have not been passed on Ext.P2 and with that grievance the writ petition is filed. 3. If as stated, Ext.P2 has been received and is pending, there is no reason why the 2nd respondent shall not consider the application and pass orders thereon. Therefore, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P2 and pass orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 2 weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/