&^F<1^ IH -raB HIQH COURT OPCHHATneQARH AT BUA8PUR •"r Wrtt Petltton Ho. _J_L^5_/2004 PETITIONBR RESPONDENTS 1. ^ L^^v; .^y' ••"' .°>*,< /-•' •?p'_^\?-" <?~ ",<,?' ^ ;&p"' Smt. Kiran Tripafhi, Wd/o Late Shri Krfahna Kiuxiar Tripattii, /^ed dBOut 35 years, R/o C/o SIrivkumar Pandey, Sanj^ Nagar, Gaiua Choraha Ke Pass, Raipur(C.G.). -Ver»iw- State ofChhattisgaA, Throi^h SecretEuy, TrBaal Wdfare Dcpartmcnt, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Shastri Chowk, Raapur (C.G.). The Director, Adim JatiTettia Anusuchit Jad Departnaent, Mantral^ra, D.K.S. Bhawan, Shastri Chowk, Raipur (C.O.). CoBector, Raipur(C.G.), Addttional Collector, Raqnu- (C.G.). WRH* PETmON UNDER AIOTCLE 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANGB OF A SUn'ABLE WKff OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBmON. CERTIORARY AND/OR SUrTABLE DIREGTION TO DO JUOTICE IN THE MATTER. DetaBs ofthe petitioa. a XI-HC-22 -yS 'aTPTCTq, t?TfrOTS, fiRmfy Iffn'fT aiTfftii 3TI^T TRT3R ^..^.:..^.a..)VH^^ ^ l^^y' 3)!;RI~^ lyWSiR?! iB^felfe' ^ ^ :y sn^i'ranw ^afsa 22-12-2005 Petitioner by Shri fl^' ^y^L.^ *l*li<-)41-i •qnCT 4 fs^ 'rfSnCTT EB srfSgq TO^ff Advocate. Shri P.S. Koshy, Oy. Adv. Genera^ for the State. Heard. This case relates to compassiona|te appointment consequent upon the death of an employee sen/ing in the State. Learned counsel for the petJtionerj the employee has occurred on or after 1-j categorically stated that in this case, the death of 1-1997 and not earlier. It is further submitted that in batch of cases bearing W.P. No. 1322/^002 involving the same question orders have been passed by this Court on 20/12/2005. He |j>rays that similarorders may be passed in this case also. • I Learned counsel forthe State doe^ not dispute the above fact and state that the State of Chhattisgarh has taken a decision to consider the cases of dependants of those employees who died on or after 1/11/199i7 strictly in accordance with the policy prevalent at that time. I In view of the submissions mac^e by leamed counsel appearing for the parties, without expressing any opinion on the m^rits of the case, in the opinion ofthis Court, ends of justice will be served if a direction is giv^n to the State of Chhattisgarh and the authorities concerned to consider and decide the c^se of the petitioner in accordance with the policy prevalent at the time of death of the em^loyee concerned. If the petitioner found eligible, appointment orders will be issued as ea petitioner is also directecf to render due cc^-operation to the authorities. It is made clear that if any gnevance still remains, thepetition including filing ofthe petition before this Ctourt. With the aforesaid observations, tljiis petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. Copy to the State counse), who respondents for complianc6. ih ly as possible on or before 30"' April, 2006. The T may avail the remedy available under the law wjll be obliged to communicate the order to the sd/- Fakhruddin [•ITg-STCTT -.<-rt'<;,.... ~-;gS^?-®F'.-. w