IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3871 of 2011 SURESH KUMAR MALLICK, SON OF CHANDRADEV PRASAD MALLICK, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MANIKA, P.O. AKHTIYARPUR, P.S. SARAIRANJAN, DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR PRESENTLY RESIDING AT MOHALLA CHALLA KASHIPUR, SONBARSA, P.S. + DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR AND AT PRESENT POSTED AS ASSISTANT ACCOUNT OFFICER IN THE OFFICE OF FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD. GOPALGANJ(RETIRED ON 31.12.2010) Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE FOOD & CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD., SONE BHAWAN, VTH FLOOR, VEER CHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR NAMELY MR. PRADEEP KUMAR. 2. MR. PRADEEP KUMAR, THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, BIHAR STATE FOOD & CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD., SONE BHAWAN, VTH FLOOR, VEER CHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA. 3. MR. AJIT KUMAR SINGH, THE CHIEF OF ADMINISTRATION, BIHAR STATE FOOD & CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD., SONE BHAWAN, VTH FLOOR, VEER CHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA. 4. MR. SITA CHOUDHARY, THE CHIEF OF PROCUREMENT, BIHAR STATE FOOD & CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD., SONE BHAWAN, VTH FLOOR, VEER CHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA. 5. MR. TRIPURARI SHARAN, THE EX PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FOOD AND CONSUMER PROTECTION DEPARTMENT, OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 6. MR. SHISHIR KUMAR SINHA, THE PRESENT PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FOOD AND CONSUMER PROTECITON DEPATMENT, OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 7. THE STATE OF BIHAR. For the petitioner : Mr. Bishnu Kant Dubey, Advocate. For the Corporation : M/s. R.S. Pradhan, Sr. Adv., Mr. A.N. Rai, Advocate. For the State : AC to AAG-2 -------------- 04. 07.12.2011 Counsel for the Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. has filed show cause on behalf of opposite party nos.1 to 4 and counsel for the State has filed show cause on behalf of opposite party nos.5, 6 and 7 placing on record the order of the 2 Appellate Authority dated 28.11.2011, whereunder punishment imposed on the petitioner has been reduced. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that from perusal of appellate order it does not appear that what shall happen to the amount directed to be recovered by the Disciplinary Authority, for such clarification petitioner would be well advised to challenge the order passed by the Disciplinary, Appellate Authority in accordance with law. The contempt petition is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)