IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 175 OF 2009 Mohanlal Pandharinath Nandanwar. ... Petitioner. V/s. State of Maharashtra and others. ... Respondents. R.K.Mendadkar with H.K.Mandlik for the petitioner. V.S.Masurkar, G.P. for the respondents. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATED : 15th September 2009. P.C. : Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused petition. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on the order of the Apex Court passed in S.L.P. (Civil) No.1070/2006 (Union of India v. Vimal Murlidhar Kumbhare & ors.); wherein the Apex Court was pleased to dismiss the petition filed by the Union of India at the stage of admission relying upon the judgment of the Constitution Bench in the case of State of Maharashtra v. Milind and others, 2001 (1) SCC 4. The very same judgment has been explained by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Ganesh Rambhau Khalale v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 2009 Bombay 122. In this view of the matter, no case is made out by the petitioner. Petition is dismissed for the reasons stated in the aforesaid judgment with no order as to costs. (A.A.SAYED, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)