COCP No.1083 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.O.C.P.No.1083 of 2009 Date of Decision:-5.8.2009 Ram Nath and others ...Petitioners Versus D.C.Dhesi and anr. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Mr.Vivek Goyal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.M.L.Saggar, Senior Advocate with Mr.Ashok Jindal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana with respondent Nos.1 and 2. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): The grievance of the petitioners in this case is that inspite of the fact that the acquisition proceedings qua the land of the petitioners were quashed vide judgment dated 29.7.2008 passed by this Court in CWP No.12146 of 2008 and it was held that the petitioners were liable to refund the amount of compensation received by them alongwith interest, the respondents have refused to accept the same on the ground that they have already challenged the aforesaid judgment by filing an SLP. In response to the show cause notice issued by this Court separate replies have been filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2 by way of short affidavit wherein it has been submitted that the petitioners were required to deposit the amount of compensation as received by them alongwith interest at the rate as mentioned in the COCP No.1083 of 2009 2 aforesaid judgment. The respondents have never refused to accept the same and in fact the petitioners have not approached the office of respondent No.1 to deposit the amount. Shri Ashok Jindal, learned Assistant Advocate General, Haryana on instructions from D.S.Dhesi-respondent No.1, who is present in Court, states that in case the petitioners approach the office of respondent No.2 alongwith the requisite amount as per the order passed by this Court in CWP No.12146 of 2008, the same will be accepted by the respondents, subject to the decision of the SLP filed by them against the judgment of this Court passed in the aforesaid CWP. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the present petition be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioners to approach the respondents to pay/deposit the amount as per the judgment of this Court. With the aforesaid liberty, this petition is dismissed as not pressed. It is needless to say that on receipt of the aforesaid amount, the respondents shall pass an appropriate order to release/restore the land to the petitioners. 5.8.2009 (Rakesh Kumar Garg) AS Judge