IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Review Petition No. 72 of 2010. Decided on: 12.07.2010. Madan Lal and others. …Petitioners. -Versus- Rup Lal and others. …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioners. : Mr. Dushyant Dadwal, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): The judgments cited by Mr. Dushyant Dadwal, learned counsel for the petitioners, i.e., (i) Gannmani Anasuya and others versus Parvatini Amarendra Chowdhary and others (2007) 10 Supreme Court Cases 296; (ii) Kamlesh Babu and others versus Lajpatrai Sharma and others (2008) 12 Supreme Court Cases 577; and (iii) M/s. Roshan Lal Kuthiala and another versus Raja Rana Yogendra Cghandra and others 1995 (1) Sim. L.C. 363 are not applicable in the present facts and circumstances of the case and these were not cited at the time when the R.S.A. No. 159 of 1999 was heard. 2. There is no error apparent on the face of record. Consequently, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge July 12, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.