IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 6TH OCTOBER 2008 / 14TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 28113 of 2008(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SHAILAJA, AGED 45, W/O.JAYAPRAKASH, PANDISSERIL HOUSE, ULLANNOOR, MURI, KULANADA VILLAGE, KOZHENCHERRY TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.E.M.MURUGAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, REVENUE DIVISION OFFICE, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, KOZHENCHERRY TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY GP SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).28113/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 6th day of October, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner’s mother acquired title and ownership over one Acre 85 cents of property in Sy.No.425/10 A B of Kulanada Village as per sale deed Nos.3178/69 and 984/58 of Sub Registry Office, Pandalam. The said property was settled by the owner in favour of two daughters including the petitioner. By Ext.P1 document, an extent of 93.5 cents, stated to be comprised in the northern portion of the property, was settled in favour of the petitioner. Thereafter, mutation in relation to the said property was sought for and according to the petitioner, respondents had committed some mistake in noting the survey number of the property allotted to the petitioner. She, not knowing the mistake, remitted the basic tax also. It was then realized that there is a mistake in noting the survey number of the property owned by the petitioner as per Ext.P1. Petitioner sought for a correction of the same as per Ext.P4 application. But W.P.(C).28113/2008 2 no orders have been passed thereon. Hence the writ petition. 2. After having heard learned Government Pleader also, writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to look into Ext.P4 and take appropriate decision thereon and if the claim of the petitioner is found to be correct, needful shall be done correcting the survey number of the property that stands in the name of the petitioner in the B.T.Register, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs