IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 12TH JULY 2007 / 21ST ASHADHA 1929 RP.No. 333 of 2007(Y) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.16793/2005 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER ----------------- K.SANJEEV RAJ, S/O K.SANKARAN, AGED 35 YEARS, KELOTH HOUSE, KAKKATTIL (P.O), VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE BY ADV. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. P.MURALEEDHARAN, S/O GOVINDAKURUPPU, PARAYIL HOUSE, KAKKATTIL (P.O), KOZHIKODE 2. A.GOPIDAS, S/O P.K.KUNHIRAMAN NAMBIAR, AYADATHIL HOUSE, KAKKATTIL (P.O.) KOZHIKODE 3. P.O.CHANDRAN, S/O KELU NAIR, ONTHAMPARAMBATHU HOUSE, VATTOLI (P.O.) KOZHIKODE 4. K.CHANDRAN, S/O KUNHIRAMAN, KULANGARA HOUSE, KAKKATTIL (P.O.) KOZHIKODE 5. THE COMMISSONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS & CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS (ADMINISTRATION) DEPARTMENT, CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE. 6. THE ASST.COMMISSIONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS & CHARITIABLE ENDOWMENTS (ADMINISTRATION) DEPARTMENT, CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE. 7. N.GANGADHARAN NAMBIAR, S/O T.V. KUNHIRAMAN NAMBIAR KOUSTHUBHAM, KAKKATTIL (P.O.) KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.SUNNY VARGHESE SRI.K.JAYASANKAR SRI.SKARIAH BABY SRI.P.A.AUGUSTINE SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SANDHESH RAJA SRI.K.SIVAKUMAR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANTONY DOMINIC, JJ ------------------- R.P. 333/2007 IN W.P.(C).16793/2005 -------------------- Dated this the 12th day of July, 2007 ORDER Radhakrishnan, J. This review petition is preferred to review the judgment of this Court in W.P.(C).16793/2005, by which the petitioners therein were directed to take charge as Non- hereditary Trustees of Kunnummal Sri Bhagawati Temple. Review Petitioner was not a party to that judgment. 2. Review Petitioner submits that instead of proceeding with the appointment of Non-hereditary Trustees in terms of Annexure A-III notification, formerly appointed Non-hereditary Trustees are allowed to continue in view of the order of this Court. 3. We make it clear that if the petitioner has any grievance, he can approach the appropriate authority under the provisions of HR & CE Act. K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN Judge ANTONY DOMINIC Judge mrcs