IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2756 of 2004 LAXMAN PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ----------- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Tara Nath Jha, Adv. For the State :- Mr. Nirbhay Kumar Singh, GP-26 ----------- 2 14.03.2011 The petitioner on the basis of Annexure-1 in C.W.J.C. No. 9319 of 2002 seeks modification of the word ‘granted’ as that of ‘admissible’ in the ninth line of first paragraph of the order dated 1.12.2004 passed in Civil Review No. 170 of 2002. In view of above, we accordingly direct that the word ‘granted’ should be read as ‘admissible’ as the world ^ns;* in the communication of the letter of Accountant General dated 9.5.2000 (Annexure-1) to C.W.J.C. No. 9319 of 2002 has been used as leave ‘admissible’ to the petitioner and not ‘allowed’ to him. Registry is directed to issue the amended copy of the order dated 1.12.2004. Accordingly, this MJC application is allowed only to the extent indicated above. Rishi/kanchan (T. Meena Kumari, J.) (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)