IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.35778 of 2011 1.Kedar Mishra, Son of Sajawal Mishra, of village Malahi Mishraulia, P.S. Malahi, District East Champaran. 2.Sudha Devi, Wife of Umesh Thakur, D/o of Kedar Mishra, of village Chatiya, P.S. Malahi, District East Champaran. -------Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar -----Opposite Party -------------- 02/- 25/10/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 364A, 367, 368, 369, 370, 371, 372, 406, 409, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, are named accused in this case, instituted on basis of complaint case no. 248 of 2011 relating to realizing substantial amount from the prosecution side to provide employment in foreign. Submission is that against these two aged petitioners, there is absolutely nothing except that when they were contacted they only stated about son-in-law of petitioner no. 1 i.e. husband of petitioner no. 2 residing at Mumbai has some contacts and may be helpful. Nothing more is attributed against them and whatever allegations of realization of money and non-refund or using wrong direction are levelled is against others. Further, submission is that these petitioners have no criminal antecedents. If it is so, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari, in connection with Gobindganj (Malahi) P.S. Case No. 53 of 2011, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for three years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)