IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1134 of 2008 SUSHILA DEVI, wife of Late Gangadhar Jha, resident of Village Bhathiserh, P.S. Benipatti, District Madhubani. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE TILKAMANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, Bhagalpur, through its Registrar. 2. The Vice-Chancellor, Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. 3. The Registrar, Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. 4. The Finance Officer, Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. 5. The Incharge, University Press, Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. 6. The State of Bihar, through the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna. 7. The Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 8. The Director, Department of Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. ---Respondents ----------- 12. 22.7.2010 A rejoinder to the counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, a copy of which has been served on the learned counsel for the respondent-University. Keep it on the record. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-University as also the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the letter dated 10th of April, 2010, as contained in Annexure A to the supplementary counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondents no.1 to 4, the calculation indicated and the payment made thereon against items no.1 to 7, except item no.6, are all incorrect since the authority while calculating the admissible amount has not properly calculated the same. The petitioner, for an example, submits that against the 2 arrears of pension, the authorities have calculated the amount admissible to the tune of Rs,2,05,395/- for the period 1st of February, 2007 to 28th of February, 2010. It is submitted that the calculation, according to the petitioner, is apparently wrong. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- University submits that the matter of calculation cannot be gone into in the writ proceeding, however, submits that in case the petitioner points out any discrepancy, the same would be considered without delay. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of her grievances with regard to the correct amount of her entitlement against all the heads, as contained in Annexure A to the supplementary counter affidavit, except item no.6, which relates to the Employees’ Welfare Fund (E.W.F.), the petitioner shall be representing her grievances by way of representation before the Vice-Chancellor, Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur (respondent no.2) ,with a copy to the Registrar of the University (respondent no.3) and the Finance Officer of the University (respondent no.4). In case such a representation is filed stating distinctly the details of her claims against different heads mentioned in Annexure A to the supplementary counter affidavit, as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in her representation be considered and disposed of by a 3 reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled. Upon consideration, in case the representation of the petitioner finds favour, the admitted dues, if any, found payable may also be paid with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)