lwil ^.1:1^^1 c IN THE HIGH CCiURT 0V eHHOTTISSARH tS BII^SFtJR, ^-- ^^^-&s^.. vy ^w j\ c^--'"ft&1^"'. .^-M^" ^yy '^e^^. A^ev' PETITIONER c^r ^ ^^ »°v- ..'P'-.i0^ •,:'>'1' .;^s'/-9' >,".' .»;" v WRXT PETITION NO.jS8°S/04 Ravinflra Kiaaar Panariya. ags^ 26 years? S/o» late Shrl. Mangalu Ram Panariya. R/Oo village Tingipur. (Naka) Tah. Xiormii nistrict Bilaspur (C.G.), VE RS U S .x''.^^ jn'- ' ...;' <^*~ ^%r^_: -.. .c?:;.;y RESPONBENTS 8 l) State of Chhattisgarh, ^.•-'*''' — -' _- . ~ ^^y' o' "^i ^ o V: y..^s®"' '..&" -»&rt- o 'fe-III1 r; -^; 'll<^:".-.........,.-.. ,v T-hrougta t Secretary Geaeral Aflni.n.i.strative oepartment, ^ B.K.s. Bhawan. Ralpur (c.G.) . 2) The Divisional Forest Offlcer* Kerbai olvlalen, »«x»l» Korba, (C.0»). 3) Sferte o£ M.P. Threugh t^Secftary» Qeneral Aflainistrativ Departnent Vllabh Bhw»aa, Bhopal (M.P.) 4) 'B&len ®fIndl.a» thatxtgh » The 3*eretary I!»partneak of personal, PubUc 6Bc'Aev«BCB aafl Persanal, Tbird Ple@r» telu»ayit Bhin»aa»KhN> Marlffc. S9W Beltei. WRIT PETITION UNDSR AKrXC&E 226/227 OF THE CONSTITWION OF INDlA FOR ISSUANGE OF WRXT OP KANDAKUS 08 ANY OTHER FGRM OR BIKECTION OR ORBER AS TO THE FACTS AND CIRCUMS- TANGE OF THE CA3E. cont?? * »*2«»« XI-HC-22 ^-a ^nqicra. ^ftn^re. 'SNCTrey •HTnWanTTSR ^"^•o-380^z ^R^g' SiT^^T T;IIsf? 'MT^'I Tiiii'Titta OT^I •g«nwTifei - :' ^ "^MI^^-i 'liV-3^i ^ feTST Tf^T^TC ?T 3lPtPT W^! 22-12-2005 Petitioner by Shri St^sUi-iT V4^yu-c't/ Advocate. Shri P.S. Koshy, Dy. Adv. Generat forthe State. Heard. - I This case relates to compassion^e appointment consequent upon the death of an employee serving jn the State. | Learned counsel for the petitioneij categorically stated that in this case, the death of the employee has occurred on or after 1 -|l 1 -1997 and not earlier. It is further submitted that in batch of cases bearing W. P. No. 1322/^002 involving the same question orders have been passed by this Court on 20/12/2005. He [jirays that similar orders may be passed in this case also. • 1 Learned counsel for the State doe^ not dispute the above fact and state that the State of Chhattisgarh has taken a decision |to consider the cases of dependants of those employees who died on or after 1/11/1997 strictly in accordance with the policy prevalent at that time. In view of the submissions mac(e by learned counsel appearing for the parties, without expressing any opinion on the mejrits of the case, in the opinion ofthis Court, ends of justice will be served if a direction is giv^n to the State of Chhattisgarh and the authorities concerned to consider and decide the c^se of the petitioner in accordance with the policy prevalent at the time of death of the employee concerned. If the petitioner found eligible, appointment orders will be issued as ea^ly as possible on or before 30 April, 2006. The petitioner is also directed to render due ccji-operation to the authorities, It is made clearthat if any gnevance still remains, the petition including filing of the petition before this Oourt. With the aforesaid obsefvations, ttjiis petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. Copy to the State counsel, who respondents for complianc6. ;r may avail the remedy available under the law will be obliged to communicate the.order to the Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ['^?feq •)'>,' '^:< Bt .KBtiBUit uate r