AJN 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.186 OF 1989 Shri H.K. Sharma ) ... Petitioner Vs. Shri Sanwarmal Kajriwal ) ... Respondent Mr. Niranjan Shimpi for the Petitioner. CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 8TH JUNE, 2006. P.C.:- Mr. Shimpi states that he has now been instructed to appear for the petitioner, who was earlier appearing in person. He undertakes to file vakalatnama by tomorrow i.e. 9th June 2006. The learned counsel fairly submits that having regard to the allegations made in the contempt petition, it is not the case of civil contempt. There is substance in his submission. The office will have to treat this proceedings as criminal contempt which will have to be heard by a Division Bench as per Appellate Side Rules. Office to take necessary steps. Liberty to apply. [A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.]