IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. (T) No. 12600 of 2008. Decided on 23.02.2011. _____________________________________________________ Damodar Dass. …Petitioner. -Versus- Secretary (Education), Himachal Pradesh Shimla and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner has already made a representation with regard to pay fixation vide Annexure A-6 on 8th July, 2004. Admittedly, the same has not been decided till date. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the representation made by the petitioner on 8th July, 2004 (Annexure A-6), within a period of four weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. While deciding the representation, the respondent No. 2 shall also take into consideration the judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gurcharan Singh Grewal and another Versus Pubjab State Electricity Board and Others (2009) 3 Supreme Court 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. Cases, 94. The petitioner shall also be heard in person and for that purpose, the date shall be notified to him separately. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge February 23, 2011. (bhupender)