IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 782(S/S) OF 2010 Devendra Singh S/o Vijai Pal Singh ….Petitioner. Versus Uttarakhand Board of Technical Education Roorkee and another …. Respondents. Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.P. Sah, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. (Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J.) Heard Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. N.P. Sah, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. By way of this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought the writ in the nature of certiorari, quashing the merit/select list for the post of Beldar downloaded on website of respondent No.1, on 27-8-2010 (contained as Annexure No.7 to the writ petition), for the post of Beldar ITI in State of Uttarakhand. During the course of arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that the petitioner be given liberty to file a representation before respondent No.1 for redressal of his grievance and the respondent No.1 be directed to decide the same by a speaking and reasoned order and the writ petition may be disposed of today. Prayer is innocuous. In view of above, liberty is given to the petitioner to file his representation before respondent No.1 for redressal of his grievance. If the representation is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be decided by the respondent No.1, by a speaking and reasoned order thereon, within a period of three weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 2 With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (B.S. Verma, J.) Dated: 01-09-2010 ISB