THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Contempt Case No.638 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner approached this Court alleging that the construction made by respondents 3 and 4 is in deviation of the building bye-laws, particularly in the context of setbacks and that respondents 1 and 2 have not taken any steps against the violation. The Writ Petition was disposed of, on 06.11.2009, directing that respondents 1 and 2 shall ensure that in the building constructed by respondents 3 and 4, the setback on the northern side is maintained and any deviations in this regard shall be dealt with, by respondents 1 and 2. This Contempt Case is filed alleging that though respondents 1 and 2 have issued notice, no follow up action was taken. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. In all fairness, learned counsel for the petitioner has brought to the notice of this Court that, challenging the notice issued by respondents 1 and 2, respondents 3 and 4 have filed W.P.No.11491 of 2010 and obtained interim order. In that view of the matter, it cannot be said there was any contempt on the part of respondents 1 and 2. The petitioner has to pursue her remedies in the said writ petition. The Contempt Case is accordingly closed. ______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Dated:18.06.2010 GJ