IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2415 of 2001 Kishore Kumar, son of Rajeshwar Lal, village Mahmadpur Mathoulia, PS Rajepur, Dist. East Champaran – Petitioner. Vs. 1) The State of Bihar, 2) Jagdish Paswan, son of Mahadeo Paswan, village Salimpur, PS Rajepur, Dist. East Champaran – Opp. Parties. 7 20.12.2010 The petitioner is aggrieved by order, dated 5.12.2000 by which the court has rejected the application to disallow Dhanpat Paswan from prosecuting the proceeding under section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Apparently a revision application was filed in this court in which Dhanpat Paswan was made opposite party. Subsequently Jagdish Paswan and Kishore Kumar filed a joint petition of compromise in the High court. Jagdish Paswan has transferred his right, title and interest to Dhanpat Paswan. Dhanpat Paswan, therefore, filed application to pursue the criminal revision application. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the application of Dhanpat could not have been allowed for the reason that it was time barred. Considering that the original revision was filed within time by Jagdish Paswan and the fact that Jagdish Paswan subsequently entered into a compromise with Kishore Kumar, this court finds that there is no illegality in the order and since the revision application itself was filed in time, the application to be added as petitioner by filing an intervention would not be time barred. This application is, thus, dismissed. The main revision application should be expedited. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)