IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44144 of 2009 MANJU KUMARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 2.4.2010 Heard Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner apprehends her arrest in connection with Ara Nawada P.S. case No. 13 of 2009 dated 19.1.2009 registered under sections 420, 467, 468, and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. According to the prosecution case two F I R named accused persons including the petitioner are alleged to have committed criminal breach of trust with respect to an amount of Rs. 1,25,000/- and they are alleged to have committed forgery also. Learned counsel for the petitioner has denied the entire allegation against the petitioner and submits that in fact she was subjected to physical harassment by the members of the prosecution party and ultimately she left the job. However, he submits that even according to the prosecution case, entire liability of Rs. 1, 25,000/- cannot be fastened against the petitioner. To a query made by the court, learned counsel has fairly conceded that his client is prepared to deposit Rs. 75,000/- which may be subject to out come of the trial. In the aforesaid back ground, let the above named petitioner in the event of her arrest or surrender in the court below within five weeks from today be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Bhojpur, Ara in connection with the above noted case, subject to the - 2 - conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and subject to further condition that within the same period the petitioner shall deposit Rs. 75,000/- in the court below which will be subject to out come of the trial. The court below at its own discretion may keep the aforesaid amount in some interest generating fund. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) M.Rahman