IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.O. NO.1546/2010 IN M.C.A. st. 19884/2010IN WRIT PETITION NO..3681/202 [LAXMINARAYAN GUPTA ..VS.. CIVIL EDUCATION SO. & 2]] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders | appearances, Court's orders of directions | | and Registrar's orders | | - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : MARCH 16, 2011. Heard Shri Jibhkate, the learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Sharma, the learned counsel for the non applicant no.1 and 2. Shri Patel the learned AGP appears on behalf of respondent no.3. For the reasons stated in the civil application, the prayer made in the civil application is granted and the delay in filing the review application is condoned, though the application is opposed by the learned counsel for the respondents. The civil application is disposed of. JUDGE M.C.A. STAMP NO.19884/2010 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. It appears from the reading of the judgment dated 10.11.2009 which is sought to be reviewed along with the appeal memo filed before the Tribunal that this court has erroneously observed in paragraph 11 of the judgment that the Teacher had not stated in the appeal memo that he had acquired B.Ed. Qualification in June 1992 and thereafter completed two years of service as a trained teacher with the management. This observation prima facie appears to be incorrect. Hence it is necessary to list the writ petitions for final hearing, so as to consider the effect of the erroneous observation of the statement of fact in paragraph 10 of the judgment. The writ petitions may be listed for final hearing. JUDGE SMP