IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36007 of 2009 MALUVI SAHEB @ MAULVI SAHEB @ MD. SADIQUE S/O MD. ISRAIL VILL-KATAHRI, P.S- SHEBPUR KAMAL, DISTT- BEGUSARAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 03.11.2009. Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. An allegation of assault against the petitioner in the first information report on vital part of the body stands corroborated from the injury report wherein the doctor has found the nature of injury to be grievous. Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner as per the averment of the FIR had a reason to be in the house of the informant as would appear from the implied consent of other family members in Jhar- Phukh done by the petitioner for the welfare of the wife of the informant. He would therefore submit that the petitioner actually has been framed in this case by the informant. In the opinion of this Court, the nature of injury does not suggest a fake or created injury and therefore when this Court would find the allegation made in the first information report to be substantiated it is not 2 inclined to grant bail to the petitioner for the present. The petitioner is in custody since 29.5.2009 and therefore he is given liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completing one year of his judicial custody. With the aforementioned observation, this application is dismissed. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)