n thexHonb‘l H wjlnira‘Bhde D/o Late Shri Madalal hel ged 4,1 years, Upper Division Teacher pg; urg iddle CG School, Karanja Bhilai, Tahsil & District D M (f , P .... etitioner ........ XE3Q§ § Respondent ..: ,1. The State Government of C hroughlthe Secretary, hhattishgarh, School Education Department Ministr .K.S‘, Bhavan, Raipur (C.G. . The DistrictEducat-ion Officer, Durg, (C.G Writ getiion under articles:2227 o_f ssuance o_f Writ i_n th‘efnature. rohibition and othersu ‘ irection _o_r' directions M I_ Qwd n Be A , T y, D ) 2 .) t 26/ th ' i ;_ P i D . HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR SINGLEBENCH‘: HON'BLE SHRI SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J WRIT PETITION NO. 1 1 1 6 OF 2006‘ Petitioner Miss lndira Bhele Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & Another Present :- Shri Ajay Shrivasiava, connsel for the petitianer. Shri V.V.S. Moorthy, Dy- Advocate Generat with Smt. Anju Abuja, Dy. Govt. Advoqate for the state. ORDER (Passed on 24m March, 2006) GOWRI The petitioner isvworking as Assistant Teacher. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to tWO increments on having passed the examination of B.Ed. Learned counsel submits that this Court by judgment and order dated 24-1-2006 in W.P;No.379l2006 while considering- the oases of similarly situated Assistant Teachers, has directed the respondents to grant two increments to the petitioners. Learned counsei further submits that the petitioner herein is similariy situated. Having considered the facts and circumstances of case and material on record, the respondents are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner in the light of the order dated 24-1-2006 passed by this Court in WrP.No.379/2006 (Ram Bharosa Sahu & Others vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others) and pass appropriate orders accordingiy. For the reasons stated above, the petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge / r