r PPELLANT ETITIONER « 1 RESPONDENTS vkykaagkamsh I 5&7 19 F2010 Q 2 e 1 \ Smt. Jamvantin Yogendra Satnami, W/o. Yoggndra Satnami, aged about 26 years, R/o. Village — Manpur, Tahsil — Mungeli, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS Stats of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretary, Women and Development Department, Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director Panchayat, Raipur (C.G.) Additional CollEEtor, Raipur (C.G.) Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Mungeli, Distt. Bilaspur «IGJ Child D.K. S. Project Officer, Women and Development Department, Distt.Bi1aspur (C.G.) Child Mungeli, Ku. Kusum Anant, D/o. \Shri Kalyan Das, R/o. Village — Manpur, Tahad —- Mungeh', Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) 2/1. (2. x3 . /4. /5. /6. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH A’I‘ BILASPI IR (CHHATTISGARH) W.A. No. (Arising out of order dated 07—1 1—2009 passed by the Single Bench of this High Court, Hon’ble Justice Shri Satish K. Agnihotri in W.P. (S) No. 643 7/2009) A P @ WRIT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2 (11 OF THE CHHATTISGARH HIGH ‘COURT (APPEAL TO THE DIVISION BENCH) ACT, 2006 2g? A No 19 of20£ St J Ygd Sl m amv tm oenra atnam pds Stt f tigh 8 s Resonent ae o C ’ atsar 5 other W 0 elan ‘ Applt AL DR N OF EHI—IAI‘ISGAR URT APPEAL TO DIWSON BENCI—H CT 20 one for the respondent No Versus 1:. RI APPE UNE SECTIO 2( } T CT’H ; H CO 06 N 4 raw The rvison preferred by the p ellant befre the Diecor, ei a o rt P Chh 2 he mder anchayat hattlsgar was dlsmsscd on 13 7 009 T passed by te Addmonal Colector Bllpur and Duector h l as “ ‘‘, Pht h b E e y §a1ncaya ave een alrmed by the learnd Single Judge b Swastha Rakshak an y d eal sister of the father of the apella 1s Cairerson o r pn' ( gm ) hp f i r anpa ancayat ungeh whereas, e father of the respondent Manur The Additional Collector vi" rr 9 ireced at nes oinment soul be mae owever e pelant pomte out hat the Director, Panchaat v1de ox _a l d t y de t l ons1enn e acts an cueumstances of the case we a f o tht th d dd 1 p y l p1n1on a e orer ate 20 2009 assed b the Addltlona Colector, Bilaspur should be folowed and freh selection should; l l s V v e mae as per ues and true and genume ,cand1date be selecte ‘ i r n on. It 'w1 e open for ot e arties 1e the aellant and th 11 b bh th p pp e . v rpd N 6 pp h l h esonent o to art1c1ate mte seection anes ‘ f th b p to Inv1ew o e aove 1111s writ apeal 1s disposed of No order as costs 2009 d p th p o 6 13 7 irected to apomt e resondent N C’dg th f d re oth x b d Rl d en'd appointed in a proper manne without being influenced by a t ! e i Sd/- N.K. ‘Agrawal Judge Jd Ph M th i I p ‘ i de ode dated 20.1. :0 dt th h y appt hd d H; larned icounsel for the l di