IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 14TH OCTOBER 2010 / 22ND ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 25766 of 2010(U) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- JAMES MATHEW,2/219,KALAPPURACKAL HOUSE, KIZHAKKEKARA,MUVATTUPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,MUVATTUPUZHA. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No. 25766 OF 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 14th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is the owner of vehicle bearing No. KL4/1240. The petitioner has submitted an application for alteration of the said vehicle as generator van. For the purpose of ascertaining whether alteration would violate the provisions under Section 52 (1) of Motor Vehicle Act an inspection was also conducted. In fact, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the vehicle in question was produced before the authority. The grievance is that despite the receipt of application and even after the inspection no final order has been passed on his application. In view of the facts obtained in this case, I am inclined to dispose of this Writ Petition with the following terms: In case the petitioner has already produced the vehicle for inspection before the respondent and inspection was already conducted, the respondent shall pass final orders on Ext.P3 application expeditiously, at any rate within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge