SiNGLE BENCH 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH ATLBILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Cl N0. S^61—/ 2010 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTI'nUTlON OF THE INDIA PETITIONER ^:r^'^tustak Ahmed - S/o. Shri »y, t/-^3y .*•' . -«•' €^ '"^".^•^Q^ -•^^ Rafiq Ahraed, aged about 38 years, R/o. Jarhabhata, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS / 1. Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur (C.G.) 11 uiaii.EB 11 yti(tit«aatt HIGH CQUKT^OEC'HHATnSGARH AT BILASFUR ^WRn-BETTT[©N(C)fNa.5502df2QlQ PBTITIONER RESPONDENTS MustakAhmed VERSLTS': : : . ' ' Regioiial Transport Authority & Anollier'.';':~'.:' ' 1" : ^' WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Me Shri SatisU K. Asnihotri. J. Present: Steri Anstiul R..Sfirivastava, Adyocate fiar the petitioner ShriM.P.Bbatia,I3eputy€rdyen^entAdvpcatefc)rtheState. OjRDERtORAD CPassed on 24th day oCSeptemtier, 2010) Ths; petitioner has filed this j)etition seeKisg a (iu'ection tt) the Regioiial Transport Authocfty to eonsider his application as early as pbsslble.,'1::-.:' .::,.:,1 • : •• '• . : :' ! l;i.' : :'1 .1' There is no preseription in ^y ^afutory rufe applicationwithmapreseribed^^l^ pfthe meetiiig and, as such, nti direction can be issued by this Court, at this stage. ^HfSwmer, it is expected ttiat tKe respondent authorities may look into Ihe gnevance of the petitib&er -and do tKe needfal, as earlyaspossible..''' . / Accordmgly.thewritpetitionisdispDsedofi (jowri