IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27863 of 2009 1. Deepak Sada, S/O-Late Matar Sada 2. Ankar Sada, S/O-Lakshman Sada 3. Amit Sada, S/O-Pradeep Sada 4. Manoj Sada, S/O-Pradip Sada 5. Tuntun Ram @ Chunchun Ram, S/O-Late Biranchi Ram 6. Ghughli Sada, S/O-Lakshmi Sada 7. Nata Ram, S/O-Late Nathuni Ram All R/O-Village-Mushahri Tola, Ward NO. 2, P.S.-Saharsa, Sadar, District- Saharsa ……………..Petitioners. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Sabutri Devi, W/O-Ramchandra Sada, R/O-Mushahri Tola, Ward No. 2, P.S.-Saharsa Sadar, District-Saharsa ……..Opposite Parties. ----------- 02 10.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State on the point of admission. In my view, this petition can be disposed of on admission stage itself. This petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the first information report of Sadar Saharsa P.S. Case No. 224 of 2009 on the ground that informant has brought the above stated false case to put pressure upon the petitioners and others so that they may not depose in Sadar Saharsa P.S. Case No. 221 of 2007. Shorn the unnecessary details, suffice is to say that the informant, namely, Sabutri Devi filed Sadar Saharsa P.S. Case No. 224 of 2009 in respect of murder of her son, namely, Furen Sada @ Parmeen Sada against the petitioners and several other persons. The aforesaid Furen Sada @ Parmeen Sada was accused in Sadar Saharsa P.S. Case No. 221 of 2007 and he was sent in jail custody in 2 connection with above stated case and faced trial and after completion of the trial when he came out of the jail and went in his village, allegedly, he was killed by petitioners and several other persons. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that some accused persons of Sadar Saharsa P.S. Case No. 221 of 2007 are still absconding and the informant has implicated the petitioners in this case to put pressure upon them so that they could enter into compromise in the above stated Sadar Saharsa P.S. Case No. 221 of 2007. Although, learned counsel for the petitioners tried to convince me but I am not, at all, convinced with the above stated submissions and, in my view, there is no ground for this Court to exercise its power vested under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. According, this petition stands dismissed on admission stage itself. Let this order be communicated to the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in Saharsa P.S. Case No. 221 of 2007. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)