IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE J.CHELAMESWAR and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.VENKATESWARA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 10318 of 2005 Between: G. Sudhakara Reddy, S/o. Pothalaiah, Modernisation Sub-Division - 25, K.C.C. MP (Quality Control), Nandyal, Kurnool Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Prl. Secretary to Govt. Irrigation and CAD Depot., Secretariat of A.P., Hyderabad. 2. The Engineer in Chief, Irrigation and CAD Depot., Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus or otherwise declaring the action of the respondents in not promoting the petitioner as Executive Engineer (Incharge) on par with his juniors who have got promotion as Executive Engineer (Incharge) by GO Rt No. 1252, Irrigation & Command Area Development Dept., Dt: 18.07.02 as illegal arbitrary and further declare that not granting such relief by the Hon'ble Tribunal in OA No. 6097/03, Dt: 27.10.03 is equally erroneous apart from violating Article 14,16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and issue consequential directions directing the respondents to forthwith promote the petitioner as Executive Engineer (Incharge) on par with his Juniors who have got promotion by GO Rt No. 1252 irrigation & Command Area Development Dept., Dt: 18.07.02 in the interest of justice as otherwise the petitioners will be put to irreparable loss and injury and pass such other order or orders as it deems fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.V.KRISHNAIAH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES II The Court at the stage of admission made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE J.CHELAMESWAR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.VENKATESWARA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.10318 OF 2005 ORAL ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice J.Chelameswar) The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission accorded. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn at the stage of admission. ______________ J.Chelameswar, J ______________________ M.Venkateswara Reddy, J 6th June 2005. mrk To 1. The Prl. Secretary to Govt. Irrigation and CAD Depot., Secretariat of A.P., Hyderabad. 2. The Engineer in Chief, Irrigation and CAD Depot., Hyderabad. 3. Two CCs to the G.P. for Services-II, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. 4. Two CD copies. Form-NIC-OGS/WP{SSR}