: 1 : IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS LETTERS LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.116 OF 2007 PATENT APPEAL NO.116 OF 2007 PATENT APPEAL NO.116 OF 2007 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.1710 OF 2007 PETITION NO.1710 OF 2007 PETITION NO.1710 OF 2007 WITH WITH WITH CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.116 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.116 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.116 OF 2007 The Chief Executive Officer, . Zilla Parishad, Nashik ...Appellant V/s. Zilla Parishad Hatpump/Veejpump . Trysem Karmachari Sanghatana, . Nashik, Dist. Nashik. ...Respondent Mr.Umesh Mankapure, Advocate, for the Appellant. . Ms.Seema Sarnaik, Advocate, for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : J.N. PATEL & : J.N. PATEL & : J.N. PATEL & A.A. A.A. A.A. SAYED, JJ. SAYED, JJ. SAYED, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 4TH JUNE, 2007. : 4TH JUNE, 2007. : 4TH JUNE, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by Zilla Parishad, Nasik, being aggrieved by the fact that the learned Single Judge while admitting the Writ Petition did not grant interim relief. 2. We have heard the learned counsel for the : 2 : parties and gone through the order. The learned Single Judge has given reasons for not granting interim relief while admitting the petition and, therefore, we do not find that there is any error or illegality in the discretion exercised by the learned Single Judge in the matter so as to call for interference. Hence the Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed. 3. In view of dismissal of the Letters Patent Appeal, Civil Application No.116 of 2007 does not survive and stands disposed of. [J.N. [J.N. [J.N. PATEL, J.] PATEL, J.] PATEL, J.] [A.A. [A.A. [A.A. SAYED, J.] SAYED, J.] SAYED, J.]