HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTI8GARH AT BILASPVR PETITIONER RE.SPONDENTS Sslm Writ Petitton (S) No. 619 oflWZ Chanesh Rani Dadsena, S/o Munooram Dadsena, aged about 31 years, working as Panchayat Secretary (Kanni), Gram Panchayat Bhar Bhaiina, Tahsil Kharasia, Distt. Raigarh (Chhattisgarh). YERSUS 1. State ofChhattisgarh Tfarou^i the Secretary, Department of Panchayat & Social Wetfare, DKS Building, Mairtralaya, Raipiir, Chhattisgarh. 2. Director (Panchayat), Govemment of Chhattisgari], Raipur 3. Collector, Raigarh (CG). 4. Deputy Director, Panchayat & Social Wetfare, Raigarh 5. Cliief Executive OfHcer, Janpad Panchayat, Kharasia, DistrictRaigarii(CG). 6. Gram Panchayat, Bhar Bhauiia, Tahsil Kharasia, Distt. Raigarii (CG), Through its Saipanch. (WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satfsh K. Aenihotri. J.) Present : Shri S.R.J. Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur and Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocates for the State/respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on 01 ofFefcruaiy, 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondent/State subniits that admittedly the impugned order dated 08.01.2007 (Annexure P/l) is passed without following provisions of Rule 7 of Madhya Pradesh Service (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999, and principles of natural justiee. 2. In view of the categorical statements made by fhe leamed couiisel appearing for titie respondent No. 1 to 5 itis established tfaat the impugiied order dated 08.01.2007 (Annexure P/l) is bad iii law aid deserves to be quashed. 3. The iinpugned order dated 08.01.2007 is accordiagly quashed. The consequences, flowing Irom this order would be available to the petitioner. However, iii view of the statement made by the leamed coiuisel appearing for the State/respondents, liberty is reserved to take fresh actioii, ifso advised, in accordance with law. 4. hi view oftfae foregoing, the petition stahds disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Ag Judge