IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIDNARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISIDICTION ORIDNARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISIDICTION ORIDNARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISIDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1600 OF 2004 IN SUIT NO.604 OF 1988 Stany Harry D’souza .. Plaintiff Vs. Christopher John & Ors. .. Defendants Mr.C.Balsara with Mr.N.Engineer i/b Desai & Diwanji & Co. for the defendants Mr.P.R.Naidu for the plaintiff CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATE : 2ND MAY, 2005 DATE : 2ND MAY, 2005 DATE : 2ND MAY, 2005 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : . The present Chamber Summons is taken out by defendant no.1 and 2 to amend written statement dt.3.4.01 in accordance with the Schedule annexed thereof and for consequential amendment. The present Chamber Summons is opposed by learned counsel for the plaintiff stating that by the present amendment vested right is sought to be depreviated by the defendant no. 1 and 2. I do not see any right vested in the plaintiff nor I see any right of the plaintiff being taken away by way of carrying out amendment in terms of draft amendment. I reject the contention of the learned counsel for the plaintiff and grant chamber summons . Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a), (b) and (c). No order as to costs