Q(93. . W‘Q'§ ‘ 9* j¢ “ I... éa\“¢" WRIT PETITION No. 26 86 /2oo_6 Jashwant Kumar Gupta, PETITIONER x (PLAINTIFF) S/o. Ramesh Gupta, aged abdut 26 years, R/o. Mam Road, Village Kusmi (Samri), P.S. Kusmi District Surguja (C.G.) . VERSUS ix RESPONDENTS jDEFENDANTl /: State of Chhattisgarh, Through- Collector, Surguja, (C. G.) / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 227 OF THE OTHER APPROPRIATE NATURE. IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR lC.G.) WGH COURT OF JUBmATURE CHHATTE$GARH : giLASPUR SENGLE BENCH km?“ BLE $HRE SR. NA¥AK, SVJ Wri€ ?etiti0n N0263$ Gf 2Q$6 Jashwawt Kumar Gupta, Si’o. Rgmesh Gupta, aged abcut 2§ years, I c. Main Road. viiiage Kusmi (Samri), P3. Kusmi, District Smgug'a {6.6,} Vs. §E$PGNDEW§ $iate of Chha’t‘iisgam, Through- (DEFENEkNJj Coliectoy, Surguja, (0.6.) Shri MRS. Bhaiia, warned Ccunse! for the pet§t§oneL p Shri. Ya$hwant Singh, Eeamed Govt Ad'v., fer ine SiaieiRespondent$, QRAL OREER (Pa3sed on 215‘ June 2006) The petii‘ioner has suffered a decree a: the hands of the civii Com and he Ems waferred an appeal ‘ia the Ceuri bebw. in the said apgeai, he has maved an appiica§on for siay cf the cperaiion and executian 0: i tna I dewee under agapeai. The app3ication, for one or the ci’ner yeaszm, is; mi ye‘i dec§ded on merit by ‘the appe§late Com. m ihe cimums§anca m e peié'zioner moved an appiicaikm unrder Sacaon §51 of ‘zha Code m‘ Civil Prosedwe pivaying the Court bebw to séay me decree uncle? appea2 3333 his applicaiion for stay is dec§ded on merit after hearing ihe oiher side. The said app§5cat§on has been rejeeted. The decree mider has med execuiion pei§tien to execute {he decree under appear. 2. Ira thai véew of i‘he mati‘er, 3 diseese of this wri‘z permen direeting that the decree under appeai erreH stand suspended rm ihe ieamec‘ appeuare Judge hears arrd disposes of the appéication med by :he petitierrer for stay. No ccsrs. Sdl- Chief Justice