3 L^L^I^^ APPLICAIIOH OTfDEB SEeg-ION 19 OF TBE ADMISISIRATOTB TRIBONAL, ACT 198S. O.A.He. (^<^S of 96. For use In the Tribunal's offlee. Bate of flllag or Date of Keceipt by post. RegistratloQ No. ^v ^-3/2-/9^ t-yq^ EE6ISTEAB TS IHE NADHX-A PRADESH AIMMIS'EEAIITB II>RIHJBAL JABALPBB. 1. Appll.eant sssvs^ Khealal Saha sonof Tikgraa Satm aged aboHt 52 years, oeeapation Service Rural Horfieulu^re Extenglon Offleer, In the offi.ee of Assistant Bireetor Horticulture, Bllaspur (M.F) -Versus- 2. Non-ApDlieaQts s 1. StateofM.P. •fchrougii Secretary Agrieulteire Departaent M.P.Bhopal. 2. Ifae Direetor Bbrtieulture and Fam Feres'fcry M.P.Bhopal. 3. Ihe Deputy Director Horticultnre and Fara Forestry, Bilaspur. 4. Shri T.R.Yadav, Horticulture Bevelopaeat Offieer, through Depaty Direetor HorticaltHre aad Fara Forestry BUaspur (M.P) 3. Partlculars of theorder aealngt whieh apTili.catioa is aade. _Sha aBolicanl; charieaees thp fonowTnp- nTTiRB...i-— k^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Sl N0.1297/2005 PETITJQNER Khemlal Sahu RESPONDENTS Versus State of Madhya Pradesh and others Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihotri. J. Present: - None for the petitioner. Sfiri A.-V. Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 16th day of November, 2009) The matter is called for hearing twice. On both occasions, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. (2) In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the petitioner forthwith. <. Sd/- Gowri A