IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10654 of 2010 ====================================================== 1. Chandra Sekhar Tiwari S/O Late Dev Narain Tiwari R/O Bhelwan Kothi, P.S. Ghora Sahan, Distt.- East Champaran, A/P Peon (Anu Sewak), Tirhut Nagar Sub-Division No.2, Bettiah (West Champaran) 2. Dast Mahmad Mian S/O Late Gaji Mian R/O Murar Pur, P.S. Harsidhi, Distt.- East Champaran, A/P Read Peon (Anusewak), Tirhut Nahar (Sub- Division-2, Bettiah, West Champaran) .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Represented Through Chief Secretary Govt. Of Bihar, Old Secretariat Building, Patna 2. Executive Engineer, Tirhut Nahar, Sub-Division No.2, Gandak Yojana, Bettiah (West Champaran) 3. Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department Balmiki Nagar (West Champaran) 4. Sub-Divisional Office, Irresation Department Null T.C. Sub Division No. Vi, G.P. Areraj-Bettiah-2 Now Office Is Sifted At East Champaran 5. Chief Engineer, Irregation Department, Motihari 6. Superintendent Engineer, Tirhut Nahar Anchal, Bettiah-2 7. Deputy Secretary, Irregation Department, Govt. Of Bihar 8. Executive Engineer, Gandhak Nahar Parmandal-2, Gandak Yojana, Bettiah-2 9. Superintendent Engineer, Gandak Nahar Anchal, Bettiah-2 10. Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Motihari, East Champaran 11. Sub-Divisional Officer, Tirhut Nahar, Sub-Division, Lauri (West Champaran) 12. Sub-Divisional Officer, Tirhut Nahar Sub-Division, Matkata (West Champaran) .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tilak Sao For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Gp17) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA) 2 04-11-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks retrospective regularization Patna High Court CWJC No.10654 of 2010 (2) dt.04-11-2011 2 when the order dated 25.2.2010 is prospective in nature. The concept of a retrospective regularization of a daily wager is unknown to the law. The Court finds it difficult to grant the relief as prayed. The writ application is dismissed. Krishna Chandra Jha/- (Navin Sinha, J)