IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.20390 of 2010 Date of Decision : November 16, 2010. Jagdev Singh @ Jagga .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Gurcharan Dass, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner's primary grievance appears to be against the cancellation report submitted in respect of FIR No.137 dated 6.8.2007 under Sections 307, 324, 341, 506, 148, 149 IPC and 25, 27, 54, 59 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Raikot, District Ludhiana (Rural). He attributes motives to ASI Sukhdev Singh of Police Station Raikot, District Ludhiana, who is said to have submitted the said cancellation report and also made an alleged false statement of acceptance of the cancellation report by the Magistrate. The petitioner accordingly seeks a mandamus to direct the respondent-authorities to take disciplinary action against respondent No.3. C.W.P.No .20390 of 2010 2 In my considered view, no case to issue the desired directions is made out for the reason that while disposing of the earlier petition wherein the alleged false statement was made by respondent No.3, this Court made no adverse observation against respondent No.3. In the absence of any finding that the statement made by respondent No.3 was motivated or lacked bonafide, no direction to take disciplinary action against respondent No.3 need to be issued. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to pursue his remedy before the departmental authorities, if so desired. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. November 16, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE