IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12163 of 2011 Arjun Chaudhary Versus The State Of Bihar with Cr.Misc. No.13022 of 2011 Shyam Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03/ 21.07.2011 Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner in Cr. Misc. no. 12163/2011. Both the above stated petitions have arisen out of Khagaria P.S. Case no. 427/2010 initially, registered under section 394 of the IPC but subsequently converted into sections 395 and 412 of the IPC and, accordingly, both the above stated petitions are being disposed of by this common order. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in Cr. Misc. no. 13022/2011 points out that in para 16 of the bail petition, date of custody of the petitioner has wrongly been typed as 4.10.2010 in place of 15.12.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction within the course of the day. Petitioners are not named in the first information report and in course of investigation names of these petitioners surfaced in this case and subsequently, they were put on test identification parade and it is stated that informant identified the petitioners. It would appear from perusal of the case diary that in course of investigation several eye witnesses claimed to have seen alleged occurrence and specifically stated about involvement of other accused 2 persons. So far as petitioners are concerned aforesaid eye witnesses have stated nothing against them. Furthermore, the above stated co- accused were apprehend and they disclosed names of these petitioners confessing their guilt. Petitioner in Cr. Misc. no. 12163/2011 was earlier working in Bandhan Finance private limited and he was ex-employee of the aforesaid company and so, it is quite natural that the aforesaid petitioner was well known to the informant of this case from before the alleged occurrence. So far as the petitioner in Cr. Misc. no. 13022/2011 is concerned, according to the confessional statement of co-accused he had not taken any active part in snatching of looted money. So, it is surprisingly enough as to how the informant identified petitioner as culprit of this case. Accordingly, petitioners, Arjun Chaudhary and Shyam Yadav, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/-each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Sessions Judge FTC No. IV, Khagaria in Sessions Case no. 34/2011 in respect of petitioner- Arjun Chaudhary and to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in Khagaria P.S. Case no. 427/2010 in respect of petitioner-Shyam Yadav. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)