IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1252 of 1995 RABINDRA NATH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4. 01.7.2008. Writ petitioner-appellant, aggrieved by the order dated 23.8.1995 passed in C.W.J.C.No.10461 of 1994 dismissing the writ application, has preferred this appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent. Mr. Rewati Raman appears on behalf of the appellant. Writ petitioner-appellant, hereinafter referred to as the petitioner, filed writ application for payment of salary for the period from 4.7.1973 to 15.12.1988. It is relevant here to state that the petitioner was earlier working as Assistant Teacher in a private school, which was taken over with effect from 1.1.1971. As the petitioner was not trained, his services was not approved. Aggrieved by the same, petitioner preferred C.W.J.C.No.3110 of 1979 before this Court. By order dated 24.11.11980, said writ application was disposed of with a direction to the respondents to grant an opportunity to the petitioner to get himself 2 trained by fixing a reasonable time limit. Petitioner, thereafter, got himself trained and ultimately, his service was approved and he was paid salary from 17.12.1988. Petitioner, for payment of the salary of the earlier period, filed C.W.J.C.No.6915 of 1993. This Court, by order dated 26.8.1993 disposed of the writ application with a direction to the Director, Primary Education to determine the issue. The Director of Primary Education accordingly determined the issue and by order dated 3.11.1993, rejected the prayer. The learned Single judge, taking into account the fact that the service of the petitioner was not approved and after the approval of the service, he has been paid his salary, did not accede to the prayer of the petitioner. We do not find any error in the same. Appeal stands dismissed. (C.K.Prasad) (Shailesh Kumar Sinha) ahk 3