HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Single Bench : Hon'bleShri Dilip^RaosahAb Deshmykh, J. CJR, No.56of2005 Petitioner/ : Bodhisatwa Education Society, Non-apolicant Through : Chairman, Near Kshetriya Gramin Bank, Pandri, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.) Versus ResDondent/apDlicant Smt. Susan Thomas, W/o Late Shri K.C.Thomas, R/o 2/234, Opposite to Medicine Corner, Baran Bazar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Civil Revision under Section 23-E of the Accommodation Control Act Present ': Applicant by Shri Abhay Tiwari, Advocate. ; Respondent by Shri Sachin Singh Rajput, Advocate. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 16*1' February, 2009) This revision arises out of an order dated 04.04.2005 passed by the Rent Controlling Authority, Raipur (henceforth 'the R.C.A.') in case No. 07/90(8) 2001-02 whereby order of eviction of the applicant from the suit accommodation under Section 23A (b) of the Chhattisgarh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (henceforth 'the Act') has been passed after an order dated 28.02.2005 striking of the defence of the applicant against eviction. 2. On 24.05.2005 while issuing notice on M.C.P.No.693/2005, an application for grant of stay, this Court directed that "the effect and operation of the impugned order shall remain stayed till next date of hearing, provided the applicant deposits the entire arrears of rent within a period of 4 weeks from today and he shall continue to deposit the running rent of every month by 5 of every month until further orders from this Court." 1 - - 3. In this revision, an objection was raised by the respondent/landlord that no rent was deposited by the applicanrt in compliance of the order dated 24.05.2005. 4. Shri Abhay Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant admits that the applicant has made default in complying with the order passed on 24.05.2005 and did not deposit any rent before the R.C.A. In this view of the matter, the order dated 28.02.2005 striking of the defendant of the applicant against eviction cannot be questioned. 5. In that view of the matter, no interference is called for in the impugned order dated 04.04.2005 granting eviction of the applicant from the suit accommodation. 6. The revision being without merit is dismissed at the stage of admission. M.C.P.No.693/2005 stands disposed o1 Sdf- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge