THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.11915 of 2010 ORDER: This writ petition has been filed assailing the action of the respondent in trying to demolish and dispossess the petitioner without initiating proceedings under Section 83 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions & Endowments Act, 1987 (for short ‘the Act’). Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri V. Venugopal, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent and perused the material brought on record. Virtually, this is the second journey of the petitioner to this Court. Earlier, the Association, namely Sri Madhava Nagar House Owners Welfare Association approached this Court by filing batch of writ petitions assailing the action of the respondents therein. The said writ petitions came to be disposed of on 28.2.2007. The relevant portion of the order passed in the said batch of writ petitions reads as hereunder: “The very same contention was raised by the petitioners in the earlier batch of writ petitions and the same was not accepted by this Court observing that public notice issued under Section 3(2) of the Act was sufficient compliance. Hence, I am unable to agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners that these writ petitions require adjudication on merits notwithstanding the alternative remedy of appeal available under the Act. Accordingly, following the judgment of the Division Bench in W.A No. 1650 of 2000 and etc. dated 31.12.2001, all these writ petitions are disposed granting liberty to the petitioners herein to prefer appeals against the orders impugned in the writ petitions. If such appeals are preferred before the appellate authority within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the appellate authority shall entertain the appeals and decide the same on merits without being influenced by any of the observations made in the order in the earlier batch of writ petitions, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of presentation of such appeals.” Indisputably, the petitioner has not filed the appeal within the period permitted by this Court in Writ petition No.9166 of 2000 and batch. The petitioner stated that she presented the appeal before the Deputy Commissioner of Endowments after expiry of the time allowed by this Court in the above writ petition. The Executive Officer issued a notice dated 12.4.2010 informing the petitioner about initiation of action against her under Section 83 of the Act for recovery of possession. Apprehending dispossession pending enquiry, the petitioner approached this Court. Sri V. Venugopala Rao, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the respondent will follow due procedure contemplated under Section 83 of the Act. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to follow the provisions of Section 83 of the Act in evicting the petitioner from the premises in occupation. No costs. _________________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY,J Dt: 26.05.2010. pnb