BEPORE THE K,P»STATE ABMINISTRATIVE TEIBUNAL AT JABAI.PBR APPliICAiaT /-r^ JJQJ"' X<al Sai Rajwade s/o Govind Raa Contingent Peon, aged aboufc 25 years, R/0 VIllage Karautl/ Ajabikapur Distt. Surgaja M.Po Versus NOH-&PP&ICAHTS 13>>State o£ H*P< tfaroagh tbe Secretary, Tribal We.lfare Bepttc Bbopal M»P» 2» Tfae Assistant Comtaissioner» TrAbal Belfare Departraent; - - AmbilEapQr Bistt» surggja K«P« S»i The Blocit Bdacatioa Of£Icer» Tr.i.bal Bfelfare X3eptt«i BIoek : Odgj.^ Bl.sttw Sarguja MoPj* APPX>ICATIO»_U/S_ X9 OE: THE AiaHINISTRATIVE TRXBBNAI.S ACT,1985 XI-HC-22 sn^r'TO R-li»hcfll^l sh7fl<fr 'aficT ;umsne sitrltWtttP*' 'TS? •<iiqitni, afllwis, facii'My OT^T T»?ra? _i^.:.?:.^.ral:.ls^ <<l*lctT aitich 200 ^^sr STI^T'S'OTW^lfel SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan 04-01^010 When the matter was called petitioner and the matterwas passed <| appears for the petitioner. Shri Bhaskar Payashi, Panel La| The instant petition has been termination as he was not regularized Return has been filed bythe stated that the petitioner is still wo| termination. Taking into consideration the present case that the petittoner cl^ dismissed for want of prosecution. p6titioner to revive the petition if caus^ order be sent to the petitioner. ^l<iTd'41f *ii*i<rtf'^ f^'sl <[S|^I< •^ STfigtT 3D^[ hrivastava. J. (or hearing, none appeared for the (ver. Even in the second round, none La|wyer for the State/respondents. fit^d bythe petitioner apprehending his |n servloe. Sl^te/respondents in which it has been [•kirg arid there is no order of his ifiature of controversy invotved in the imed regularization, the f»tition is 1-lowever, liberty is reserved to the of action still survives. A copy ofthis Sdi- ManindraMohanShrivastava Judge