IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 12TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 23RD MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 4674 of 2009(F) ------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- JOSE K. PAUL, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O. LATE K.A. PAULOSE, KEECHERY, ELAMPAKAPALLY. P.O, IMURI, KOOVAPPADY, PERUMBAVOOR. BY MR.P.ALI, ADVOCATE. MR.T.ANCY, ADVOCATE. RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. TOWER VISION INDIA PVT. LTD., ARACKAL ARCADE, VYTTILA, KOCHI, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS DULY CONSTITUTED POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SRI. SREEJITH PILLAI, THE PROJECT MANAGER. 2. THE SECRETARY, KOOVAPPADY GRAMA PANCHAYATH (SPECIAL GRADE), KOOVAPPADY.P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.4674 OF 2009 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of February, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner challenges Ext.P4 order of the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions, Thiruvananthapuram in I.A.No.104/2009 in Appeal No.67/2009. That appeal was filed by the 1st respondent against the order of the 2nd respondent directing the 1st respondent to stop the construction of a tower undertaken by them as per a building permit issued by the 2nd respondent . The Tribunal has, by the impugned order, stayed the order of the Panchayat. The petitioner is not a party to the appeal. 2. In the above circumstances, the remedy of the petitioner is to get himself impleaded in the appeal and move for vacating Ext.P4 order. Therefore, I am not inclined to interfere with Ext.P4 in this writ petition. Therefore, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to get himself impleaded in the appeal and move for vacating Ext.P4 order, this writ petition is dismissed. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd