Petitioner Respcndents HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (Art.227) No.675 of 2011 Smt.Harbhajan Kaur Bhatia W/o. Kulwant Singh, aged about-48 years, R/o.ViHage-Kansabei, Tahsil Bagicha, District-Jashpur (C.G.) Versus SmtDoleshwari Yadav W/o Lt.Tikeshwar Yadav, aged about 30 years. Minor Kumari Mamta Yadav D/o. Lt.Tikeshwar Yadav, aged about 12 years. Minor Chandraprakash Yadav S/o. Lt.Tikeshwar Yadav, aged about 10 years. Through their Iegal heirs (Mother) Smt.Doleshwari Yadav W/o Lt.Tikeshwar Yadav. Nitya nand Yadav S/o. (Not mentioned). aged about 60 years. Smt.Rambha Yadav W/o Natyanand Yadav aged about 55 years. Ali R/o. Viiiage Patrapali. Post-Palidih, Tahsii Pathalgaon District Jashpur (C.G.) Umesh Yadav S/o. Purpomani Yadav aged about 2O years. Occupation Driver, Rlo. Wi-Pakargaon, Tahsil- Pathaigaon, District-Jashpur (C.G.} (Writ Petition under Articie 227 of the Constitution of india) MLAbhishekh Saraf, counsel for the petitioner. Mr.Harish Khuntiya, counsei for respondents No.1 to 5. None present for respondent No.6. (SB: Hon‘ble Mr. T.P. Sharma, J.) ORDER (1 5-1 1-201 1) 1. By this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of india the petitioner has chaiienged the iegaiity and propriety of the order dated 15.i1.2010 passed by the Additional Motor Claims Tribunal. Jashour, in v w MMWWWw (17 e2 ’ Claim Case No.1/2007, whereby the application for impleading one person Le. alleged purchaser of motor vehicle as a party has been dismissed. . l have heard learned counsel for the parties. perused the order impugned and other documents filed on behalf of the petitioner. . The present petitioner is registered owner of the vehicle, but he has filed application for impleading the person namely Narendra Kumar as a party on the ground that he has purchased the vehicle, although ownership has not been changed in the record of R.T.O.. therefore, she is not liable and the alleged purchaser Narendra Kumar may be liable for payment of compensation. . At present. the petitioner is registered owner and in case of proof such transaction liability couid not be fastened upon the petitioner and she may be absolved from the liability, but by dismissing the application the Additional Claims Tribunal has not committed any illegality warranting interference in exercise of supervisoryjurisdiction. . Consequently, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed and it ls hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge \