1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Review Application No. 138 of 2011 (Digambar Barber v. Abdul Waheb) in Second Appeal No. 367 of 1994 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. Anil H. Kasliwal, Advocate for the applicant Mr. S.S. Choudhary, Advocate for the respondent PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. The application seeking review of the order dated 1st February, 1995 does not deserve further consideration. The application seeking review deserves to be dismissed. 3. When the impugned order was passed, the applicant / original appellant admitted to vacate the suit plot of land. What happens thereafter is beyond the scope of the order under review. If the appellant comes to know that the respondents were not owners of the suit property, he would probably get a fresh cause of action, but would not get an opportunity to reverse the order under review. The review application stands dismissed. 21st June, 11 ( A.V.NIRGUDE, J. ) SRM/ 2