IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 2987 of 2009 Between: C. Venaganna S/o. C. Venkatapathi R/o. Nandavaram (V) Banaganapalli (M) Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Managing Director Andhra Pradesh Education & Welfare Infrastructure Development Corporation 4th Floor, S.I.E. Mal Building, S.E.R.T Complex, Opp. L.B. Stadium, Fathemaidan Road, Hyderabad. 2 A.P. Schedule Caste Service Cooperative Finance Corporation Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director Sankshema Bhavan, Masab Tank Hyderabad. 3 The District Collector/Chairman Kurnool , Kurnool District. 4 The Executive Engineer, Andhra Pradesh Education & Welfare Infrastructure Development Corporation Opp. Indoor Stadium, Kurnool, KUrnool District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not granting medical leave/earned leave is illegal, arbitrary, and opposed to Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondents to grant the petitioner for medical leave/earned leave/promotion to the post of Junior Assistant/Record Assistant and to pay all the consequential benefits, Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.C.H.SATISH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: SRI M. GANGA RAO. The Court made the following : ORDER: The 3rd respondent issued proceedings vide Rc.No.4759/93, A1 dated 4-11-1995 absorbing the petitioner in the existing vacancy of Attenders in the office of the Executive Engineer, Kurnool District, Scheduled Castes Service Cooperative Society Ltd., Kurnool. Since the respondents are not considering to grant medical leave and earned leave, he approached this Court invoking the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. When this Writ Petition came up for admission, Sri M.Ganga Rao, the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of 2nd respondent and the learned Government Pleader for School Education appearing on behalf of 4th respondent take notice. The limited grievance of the petitioner is that the representations dated 24-01-2009 and 09-02-2009 are not considered by the respondents. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider the representations 24-01- 2009 and 09-02-2009 and pass appropriate orders within four weeks from the date of the receipt of a copy of this order. __________________________________ Justice B. SESHASAYANA REDDY Date: 06-03-2009. Note: C.C. in one week. BO Dvs HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2987 OF 2009 Dated 06-03-2009