In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ...... Criminal Misc. No.27267-M of 2007 ..... Date of decision:1.5.2007 Harpreet Kaur and another .....Petitioners v. State of Punjab and others .....Respondents .... Present: Mr. Kuldeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. ..... S.S. Saron, J. (Oral) In this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. the petitioners seek protection of their life and liberty from respondents No.4 to 6. It is stated that the petitioners are major. The date of birth of petitioner No.1 is 1.3.1986 as per Matriculation certificate (Annexure-P.1) and that of petitioner No.2 is 6.2.1977 as per certificate (Annexure-P.2). The petitioners solemnized their marriage amongst themselves on 29.4.2007 at Gurdwara Jiwan Sudhar Sabha, Sector 32-C, Chandigarh. The certificate regarding solemnization of marriage is placed on record as Annexure-P.3 and the photographs showing the solemnization of their marriage have been placed on record as Annexure-P.4. The marriage that has been solemnized by the petitioners, it is stated, is not to the liking of respondent No.4 who is Cr. Misc. No.27267-M/2007 [2] the father of petitioner No.1, respondent No.5 who is the mother's sister of petitioner No.1 and respondent No.6 who is the mother's brother of petitioner No.1. Therefore, the petitioners apprehend danger to their life and liberty from respondents No.4 to 6. It is stated that the brother of petitioner No.2 has been detained in the Police Station Kharar and the respondents No.4 to 6 are seeking production of petitioner No.1. After giving my thoughtful consideration to the matter, it may appropriately be noticed that the petitioners have not approached respondents No.2 and 3 setting out the grievance as has been made in the present petition. Respondents No.2 and 3 would be in better position to appreciate the ground realities and circumstances and grant the necessary relief to the petitioners. In the circumstances, the criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of with a direction that in case the petitioners approach respondents No.2 and 3 setting out their grievance as made in the present petition the same would be looked into by them independently and in accordance with law. May 1, 2007. (S.S. Saron) Judge *hsp*