IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20782 of 2010 1. RADHE SINGH 2. Guddu Singh 3. Sunil Singh 4. Awadhesh Singh Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 23.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Unidentified dead body recovered from the premises of Railway was identified by family member as of Saktidhar Singh @ Mantu Singh. It is submitted that four months after the death petitioners’ name appeared in the statement of daughter-in-law (wife of the deceased). In between four months, it is said that a complaint case was filed by her for the offences under Section 498A and concerning offences which was due to her fear to transfer all the family properties to petitioners no. 3 and 4 and their wives. Anyhow that fear came to an end by a compromise in Lok Adalat, believing which refusal of anticipatory bail cannot be justified. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioners is allowed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Sasaram G.R.P. P.S. Case No. 11 of 2009 above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of J.M., Railway, Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)