IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No. 857 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : MAY 11, 2009 THE SANGRUR DISTRICT COOPERATIVE LABOUR AND CONSTRUCTION FEDERATION LIMITED ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. AS Manaise, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. AK Sharma, Senior DAG, Punjab. Mr. IS Saggu, Advocate, for respondent No.5. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) This petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing order dated 14.1.2009 (Annexure P-6) under which the application moved by the petitioner to stay the election on the interim vacancy in Zone No.1 of Labourfed has been dismissed. The dismissal of the application of the petitioner follows dismissal of the objections of the petitioner in regard to reformation of Zone No.1. Civil Writ Petition No. 857 of 2009 2 Essentially, the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali) already stands represented in Zone No.2 as being part of Ropar during the elections held in year 2005. The respondents, however, have included S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali) in Zone No.1 with Districts Patiala, Fatehgarh Sahib and Sangrur. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that if this is allowed, dual representation will be given to S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali), which is not permissible in law. The official respondents, by way of filing written statement, have taken the stand that the petitioner had filed an objection petition in relation to constitution of Zone No.1. The petitioner was heard and after examining the record of Labourfed and keeping in view the number of Societies in various Districts, the objection petition was dismissed vide order dated 31.10.2008. It is the stand of the respondents that the zones have been reconstituted keeping in view the number of Societies in each zone and not on the basis of number of Districts. The fact that District S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali) is part of Ropar District has been denied. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to point out any Society which has fallen in two zones. The revision petition filed by the petitioner against order dated 31.10.2008 is pending adjudication before the Additional Registrar (General), Cooperative Societies, Punjab, Chandigarh. Having regard to the fact that the revision petition is pending adjudication before an authority, this petition is disposed of, however, with directions to the Additional Registrar (General), Cooperative Civil Writ Petition No. 857 of 2009 3 Societies, Punjab, Chandigarh, to dispose of the revision petition titled 'The Sangrur District Cooperative Labour and Construction Federation Limited, Sangrur v. Joint Registrar (Banking), Cooperative Societies, Punjab and others' within 3 months of receipt of a certified copy of this order. May 11, 2009 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE