IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 9683 of 2005 Between: Sri G. Vittal Reddy S/o narayana Reddy r/o H. No. 294, Camsari Bazar, Bowenpally, Secunderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Union of India, rep by Secretary, Ministry of Defence South Block, New Delhi 2 Director General, Defence Estate, West Block, New Delhi 3 Station Commander, Andhra Sub-Area, Bollram Secunderabad 4 The Secunderabad Cantonment Board, rep by Executive Officer, Secunderabad .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate order ordirection more particularly one in nature of WRit of Mnadmaus directing the respondnets 1 and 2 to constitute a varied Board as per Section 14 (1) of the Act by issuing necessary declaration and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit andproper inthe circumstance of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.R.PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) The Court made the following : ORDER: The period sought to be extended for one more year of the constitution of varied/board is itself over and therefore, the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. Date:14.03.2008 Ccm To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRT}