IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 26TH JULY 2007 / 4TH SRAVANA 1929 RP.No. 476 of 2007() -------------------- REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/OPP.PARTY: ----------------------------------------------------- ESI CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL DIRECTOR (KERALA), REGIONAL OFFICE, PANCHADEEP BHAVAN, NORTH SWARAJ ROUND, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SMT.T.D.RAJALAKSHMY, SC, ESI CORPN. GOVT. PLEADER, SRI.NOBLE MATHEW RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/APPLICANT: --------------------------------- JOSE JOHN, KANDAMKULATHI HOUSE, RAILWAY STATION ROAD, IRINJALAKUDA. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: J.B.KOSHY & M.N.KRISHNAN, JJ. ------------------------------------- R.P.No.476 OF 2007 in Ins.Appeal No.49 of 2006 & C.M.Appl.No.751 of 2007 ------------------------------------- Dated 26th July, 2007 ORDER Koshy,J . This review petition is filed contending that the case was wrongly decided. A review petition cannot be equated to a petition for rehearing of the matter or an appeal proceedings. The judgment was dictated in open court. If any error is committed in the judgment, it is for the petitioner to take the matter in an appeal. No grounds are also stated to condone the delay of 91 days. Hence, both delay condonation petition as well as review petition are dismissed. J.B.KOSHY JUDGE M.N.KRISHNAN JUDGE tks