IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. WRIT PETITION LD.NO.2952 OF 2004 Govind W. Dhakrao. ...Petitioner. Vs. The Executive Officer, Slum Rehabilitation Authority & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr. S.A. Sawant for the Petitioners. Mr.G. D. Utangale for Respondent No.1. Mr. Ashok Pandey for Respondent No.4. ..... CORAM : DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J. & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. November 4, 2004. P.C.: During the course of the hearing, the learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4, M/s.R. K. Madhani & Co., has offered transit accommodation No.49/1108 at Pratiksha Nagar, Sion, Mumbai, to the Petitioner. The Petitioner has agreed to shift to the transit accommodation. A key of the same has been handed over by respondent No.4. The learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4 submits that the new building would be completed within 8 to 10 months and thereafter, the petitioner would be offered a permanent accommodation in that building. He submits that flats are allotted by a draw of lots. The Petitioner would be at liberty to make a representation to respondent Nos.1 and 2. We hope and trust that the representation of the Petitioner would be considered by respondent Nos.1 and 2 in accordance with law in regard to the classification of commercial use of the premises. No further directions are necessary. This petition is accordingly disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.