(AC? i a0?” ‘ gingm Bench IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ‘ w.p.(syNo. 2MB f /2o11. t Latel Das Jgogansh S/o 1at€ Samaru Das Joganslh aged about 65'years Occupat1on Retlred Govt Servant Resldent of, V111age Chached1,: Post ‘ Din’douri, Block < Lormi, District E \x §ilaspur C.G. ' VERSUS REPENTS’ <t 1./-é£ate of CG. through the Secretalyt School Education Department , DKS Bhawan Raipur, C.G. / 2. The ' District Education Officer, Kawardha, District Kabirdham C.G. 3. The Joint Director Treasury and Pension, Kabirdham, District Kabirdham C.G. ‘ .WRIT .PETITION .UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF .INDIA FOR ISSUE ‘OF rAN APPROPRIATE WRIT ,IN __THE NATURE OF' MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI ETC. OR' DIRECTION/ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. PETITIONER \ SOND @ HIGH COURT OF CHHA'ITISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Present: WRIT PETITION (S) No 2183 of2011 Latel Das J?gansh. VERSUS State of C.G. & Others. I SB: Hon’ble Shri satish K.!Agnihotri, J. l Shri Rakesh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, DeputyAdvocate General for the State. \ ‘ ORDER ORAL (Bassed on 27 day of April, 2011) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation in thelight of circular dated 05.01.2011 (Annexure P/2) issued by the Govemment ‘of Chhattisgarh, School Education Department Learned counsel appearing for other side has no obj ection. No permission of this Court is required to make representation to the respondent authorities. Thus, such direction cannot be issued; However, ifthe petitioners make a representation to the respondent authorities, the same may be considered and decided in accordance with law, on its own merits and perspective. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is dismissed. /’; i . sdp ,3 Satish K.Agnihotri \‘s Li ‘ t J Judge ’ l WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA