IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10604 of 2010 1. CHANDRA BHUSHAN RAI, S/O LATE SUKESHWAR RAI, R/O VILLAGE BANUA, P.O. TURKI KHARARU,P.S. MEENAPUR,DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT STAFF COLONY , NEAR DUMRA THANA (SOUTH), DUMARA, P.S. DUMRA, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, PROVIDENT FUND DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER, ACCOUNT ADMINISTRATION, DIRECTORATE OF PROVIDENT FUND, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF PROVIDENT FUND, BIHAR, PATNA. 5. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF PROVIDENT FUND, BIHAR, PATNA. 6. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SITAMARHI. 7. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, SITAMARHI. ----------- 02. 12.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly concedes that the impugned order of transfer dated 28.6.2010 has been passed after he has completed three years of posting at Sitamarhi. He however submits that the State is expected to act as a model employer and enforce its administrative circulars with regard to transfer uniformly upon all employees. There can be no justification for transferring employees, who have been posted at a station for three years, even while others have continued at the same place for six years or more are given a favoured treatment and left untouched. If the petitioner has filed a representation or files a fresh representation alleging discrimination in enforcement of administrative circulars by specifying 2 names of others, this Court requires the respondents to consider his representation by a reasoned and speaking order and dispose off the same within a maximum period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The application stands disposed. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)