Crl.MC 1209/2010 Page 1 Of 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve: 15th December, 2010 Date of Order: December 22, 2010 + Crl. MC No.1209/2010 % 22.12.2010 Sardar Singh & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus State & Anr. ...Respondents Counsels: Mr. Rajat Wadhwa for petitioners. Mr. O.P. Saxena, APP for State/respondent. JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? 3. Whether judgment should be reported in Digest? JUDGMENT 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been preferred by the petitioners for quashing of FIR No.626 of 2006 under Sections 147/148/149/323/308/506 IPC registered at police station Rajouri Garden on the ground of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. The complainant was summoned to the court to verify the compromise. However, the complainant stated that he had agreed to compromise with the petitioners on certain conditions and these conditions were not fulfilled by the petitioners. According to him oral assurances were given to him that the petitioners would leave the management and that the communication tower on Gurudwara shall be removed. He submits that since these conditions have not been fulfilled, the compromise was not effective. Crl.MC 1209/2010 Page 2 Of 2 3. Since this petition has been filed for quashing of an FIR on the basis of compromise and the complainant states that he has not compromised the matter with the petitioners, this petition is hereby dismissed. 4. The petition stands dismissed. December 22, 2010 SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA, J rd