IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2247 of 2010 RADHEY KRISHNA RAI Versus ANSHULI ARYA 3 22.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 submits that the order of the Court has been complied with necessary office order has been issued as contained in Annexure- E. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the payments have been made but interest has not been paid besides the revision. As regard the denial of the claim for the leave encashment and interest, petitioner proposes to ventilate his grievances against non-payment of leave encashment and interest in accordance with law. Since the order has been complied with this contempt is not proceeded further. This contempt application is accordingly disposed of. Amrendra/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.), -----------