CMPMO No. 138 of 2010 03.05.2010 Present: Mr. R. L. Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. G.R. Palsara, Advocate, for the respondent No. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Executing Court ordering the sale of the property of the petitioner herein. On going through the pleadings, I do not find any ground to set aside the order challenged. A plea has been made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that his client is prepared to go for one time settlement with the decree holder bank. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that because of the health condition of respondent No. 2, judgment debtor and the fact that the petitioner wants to settle the entire matter with the bank, the order of sale may not be executed. This plea is not opposed. This petition is accordingly disposed of with the following directions: (i) That the petitioner herein shall approach the State Bank of India at Mandi through its Chief Manager with one time settlement proposal. (ii) Such proposal shall be considered by the bank in accordance with the policy/scheme in force. (iii) In case the proposal is accepted and the parties accept to abide by the settlement so arrived at, the execution proceedings shall stand satisfied. (iv) In case, no settlement is arrived at between the parties, the Bank will free to execute the decree. The order dated 31.3.2010 is accordingly modified and the sale shall not be effected as ordered. It will be open to the bank to apply for execution/sale of the attached property, in case no settlement is arrived at between the parties. The petition is disposed of. There shall be no orders as to cost. Dasti copy on usual terms. The attachment shall not be affected by this order. May 03, 2010 (Dev Darshan Sud), (KRS) Judge