IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 5840 of 2006 Between: 1 S. Spandana Reddy D/o. S. Shankar Reddy Secunderabad-500 015, Being Minor, Rep. by its Natural Guardian, Father Sri S. Shankar Reddy S/o. S. Venkata Reddy, aged 41 years. 2 J.S. Rahul S/o. J. Hemanth Kumar Secunderabad-500 011, Being Minor Rep. by its Natural Guardian, Father Sri J. Hemanth Kumar S/o. Jeevanandam , aged 45 years. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of 2 A.P. State Council for Higher Education, Rep. by its Secretary, Mahaveer Marg, Hyderabad-500 028 3 All India Council for Technical Education, Rep. by its Member Secretary, New Delhi -110 002. 4 Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Rep. by its Registrar, Kukatpally, Hyderabad. 5 Convener, EAMCET-2006 Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, one in the nature of a writ of Madnamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order declaring the Public Notice dt. 16-2-2004 issued by 3rd Respondent in so far as amended norms (1) with respect to prescribing minimum qualifications for admissions in B.Tech-Biotechnology as arbitrary, illegal, irrational, discriminatory and violative of petitioner right guaranteed under Art 14 of Constitution of India and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble deems fit and proper and in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:M/SC.KODANDA RAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 5840 OF 2006 ORDER: 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive. 2. Recording the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _____________________________ Justice B.Seshasayana Reddy 13th August, 2008. KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 5840 OF 2006 13th August, 2008