BM THE HON'BLE.BLGH<:QURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPVR W.P. (U/A 227) No. <T, <JiL /2008 ^K-^: B$;s PETITIONER APPELLANT ^^^.^ i®J^.^ 1—« ,••••—»«• M^. "^i' RESPONDENTS RESPONDENTS K't; sss' Neeraj Tamboli, S/o. Sukhiram Tamboli, Aged about 38 years, R/o. Village Dadhi, Tahsil Bemetara, District Durg (CG) VERSUS^ 1] State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Collector, Durg, District Durg 2] Sub-Divisional Officer, Bemetara, District Durg (CG) ^. 3] Kamal Gupta j S/o. Neelkanth Gupta, Aged about 32 years, R/o. Village Dadhi, Tahsil Bfimetara, District Durg (CG) 4] Tahsildar, Bemetara, District Durg (CG) WRITPETmON UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOF INDIA JEEIEEIQNEB^S] XI-HC—78 ^st 'fW,vi^, 'a-S-^'w, hw-vy. W1WI ?h*ii<n •5^4-^'--^ 200^ 3iI^T'^R7('rt^tT) 31Ia7I ^I R-ti'* ^^ '3TI^?T ShHW ('.- r Tsiwd^f ai^i B. Ifan'M®ShriJustice N.^Aearfwal fortiiep|etit Shri Manoj Paranjpe, A«ivocate| Shri Gautem Khetrapal, Advoc^te Shri Satish Oupta, Dy. Govt. A<|1 Shri Paimijpe, eouasel r^ceivedtelephoBiGinstruetteaofpeti^ ^essthis petteioa.andyi^s J^-withdlcEtwaloftiiepetitiQa. PrayCTisallowed. ConseqBei^y, Ifae petttioa is d|saaissed as not pessed. No der asto coste. qOTfeTTlf'WRif'il fe^ TfSn^R ^3Tfin3It^( fcrthepetitioaer. fortiteTespondeBtNo.3. IvocatefertheStafe. ^titioaer submits tiirt tcxfay he tiiwerthat he does not wmfrto Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge •L