IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.7109 of 2011 Date of Decision: April 26, 2011 Surinder Kumar .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. J.S. Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. Commissioner, Ambala Division, Ambala Cantt., vide order dated 28.10.2009 (Annexure P-2) accepted the appeal filed by respondent No.4, Satish Kumar, while taking into account his higher education and young age for appointment as Lambardar. The order has been upheld by the Financial Commissioner vide other impugned order dated 15.12.2010 (Annexure P-1). 2. In view of the fact that relevant material has been taken into account by the CWP No.7019 of 2011 [2] appellate authority, no ground for interference in extraordinary writ jurisdiction is made out. No interference is called for in judicial review. 3. The petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) April 26, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?