'<'1 si INTHEHIGHCOURrOFJUEJIEATURE AT^BILASPUR tn <£-A- .1 t.0f(, (ARISING OUT OF AN QRDERDATED 7-8-2006 PASSED^Y THE HQN'BLE CQURT IN WREE PETITION_NQ, 6213/2005: GAJENDRAPANIKA ANDANOTHERVS._STATEOFC.G.AND 50THERS) .. :; :;-/:1' • ..•-•: -'^^ /' ; : . • . ; :: 1 Applicants: 'r. /^i /^ / :^/; <^/ •^ 3. ^ 5. Non-applicants: 1 Sfate pf Chhatfisgarh, throiigh Home Secretary, iMaatralaya, D.K.S Bfaavan, Raipur(C.G.) Director General of Police, Police Headquarters, Raipyr(C,G.) Supermtendent ofpoliee, Sarguja, District at Sarguja(C.G. ' ! / i. Lal Umed Singh, City Superintendent of Police, Ambikapur District Sarguja (C.G.) D. K. Singh, Town Inspector, PoliceStation, Ambikapur, DistrictSarguja(C.G.) Khogesh, Police Constable, Police Line, Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) Versus Gajendra Panika, son of Shri Bnjm&han Ram, aged 20 years, Qccupation, Waiter in Jaiswal Hotel, Ambikapur, r/o, village and Post Umako, P.s. Kusmi, Tahsil, Samri, DistrictSarguja(C.G.) Basarit alias Kanhaiya, son of Shri Chanyrika Siiagh, age4 18 ^ Qccupation, Waiter iu Jaiswal Hotel, Ambikapur, r/o yillage Silfili, P. S. Pratappur,P6stKarsi,DisfrictSarguj&(CG) API^ICATIQNFOREXTEMSIQNGE'riMEGRANTEDBYTHE HON'BI^ COtjm'TO^MtPEEl^T^^^^I^^ XI-HC-22 3^ •^w\vn, CTTOo'is, ficiiuy 't.'i.. 3TI^?T q5 HfflMI SR*ira> . C.C.NU y?/c^>'l t%:"""""""""""g^ 20tt ^ f^s' W( 20tt Sfl^TqiT R-fi'+aD^r Sfili'o (rfStT a<i^i gkiiwsfer «fii'iil<'i''fl-f'<Wi"<Tffte(^<Ri'Ki< ^aif^Ta'n^T 11/01/2007 Shri A.S. Kachhawah, ^ovt. Advocate for the applicant/State in M.C.C.No.807/2006 and no^i-applicant/State in Contempt Case No. 123/2006. Shri Anup Majumdar, ounsel for the applicant in Contempt Case No.123/2006 and non-applicar|t in M.C.C.No.807/2006. Heard. This Court vide i|irder dated -07/08/2006 passed in W.P.No.6213/2005 directed the Investigating Officer tocomplete investigation by next three m|anths from the date of registration of the first information report. M.4.C.No. 807/2006 has been filed mentioning var'ious reasons for- exten ;ion of the period for completion of investigation. On the other h|and, Contempt Case No. 123/2006 has been filed because of non-complianija of the above order. Learned counsel for tl^e non-opplicant in M.C.C.No.807/2006 ond applicant in Contempt Case ^ one month's time os a las1i o.123/2006 has no objection in case only opportunity is allowed further to the Investigating Officer to comp^lete the investigation. Admittedly, Shri BalaJ i Rao, Additional Superintendent of Potice, Sarguja, is investigating the c^ise. Having considered the grounds mentioned in the application for extensionof the period, furt^ier one month's time is allowed from today j^^f^T) XI-HC-22 3^ •<<1<(10<1, ®Tfl<rl'IS,Rcll«y Y^ 311^1 Msiqi - 'v' iiini sn*<i«o •••••••••••••"•••••• g^ 200 iSrc^ 3II^?T?iT )?:lN;3(^T stt^ich <yi?a st>ii°n Sii^v ewiiS^vf^l with a direction to Balaji Sarguja, who is Investigaf within a period of one mont+i counsel for the 5tate to co| Balaji Rao, Additional Superjntendent of With the aforesaid Case No. 123/2006 stand dit OT UL %0'7-fo^ qiiifci'n'f ii*«'iVffte^<.Ri«i<. ^ari^TSIl^T Rao, Additional Superintendent of Police, •ing Officer to complete the investigation from today and further direct to learned nmunicate the order passed by this Court to Police, Sarguja, forthwith. direction, M.C.C.No.807/2006 and Contempt iposed of. ^ Sd/- V.K.Slirivastava Judge