-T/f -3-^r ^|^|<r<4, ^Tn^-l}<o, f^<y1l^^< WWST'^qraTi "^200 ^T^?T 1T?W ( ^I^^) W^T'^Tl^?!^ °^?i 'aii^T'^jt^ ^^w^fi^^nt^ ^n^ferin CR?s^f ^fe^ T^R$R '^'^m3?i^r Single Bench; Hon'ble Jjustice Dhirendra Mishra W.P. [el N^.2384/2009 (Petition Article 21, 226 ojf the Constitution of India) Petitioner '. Dadu Ram Sc|nkar, S/o Shri Paras Ram Sonkar, aged about Byapari Licerj Vs KesDosid^nte 18 years, Occupation Thok Sabji see, Krishi Vipnan (Mandi) Bocrd, at Rajnaradga^n, R/o Lakhoii Naka Chouk, Ward No.30, Rajnar|d9Qon, Distt. Rcynandgaon (C6) 1. Chhattisg^xrh State Krishi Vipnancai (Mandi) n-—-Jp^-;^...- //^^\ tsoara, Kaapur ^t?j 2. KrishE llpoj Mandi SamitL IT^rough ff--^..«A^.-i r^^ :.--..-. j^ ^-.< rs.;-«xA r^-. :—-.^ji--«*« o. oecreTar^ (C6). State ofi ,T© OT |CnnGTTIsgGlrsn, Tnruugn o©cr©Tary Agriculturje AAQntraloya. D.K.S. Bhawan. Raipur (C^ 4. CollectorJ A<ft ^B? ^»^^<^ vo.ug.^yu^ Mr. Yashwant Tiwari, Adv. fc| Kqjnonugaon, UISTT. KQjnonagaQn r*^^ =.*-.»—=^^i District RGijnandgGon (C6) r the petitioner. Mr. A. bas, P.L. for the Stat^. Heard. The petitioner has filed t|?iis petition for direction to the respondents to allot him a shop in ^hoppina complex constructed in the premises of Krishi Upaj AAo^ndi, Bas|sntpur, Rajnandgaon. <?rievance of the petitioner| is that he deposited premium of Rs,50,000/- for altotment of shopj in the said shopping complex vide Ann<p>Yi ir'p. P-? hi< nnm^ wn<; nl^Q iii^luri^rl in the list nrenered bv th& ^m^N^^N^a?R^tm=?t^m—K/95—i 1 /2098—i,00,000. ^ ^:;... %. '3^ ^II^I^I^, ^nl^Ko, ^TRT^ <?pmrww^ "^200 ^n^i^ (^q{^<^r) m ^N '^R^^T^^N' V<L; 1?^!W^ftcf ^li^l? sl^op b4en 1|he MandE of Annexure P-3 as the p| of premium for allotment of been allotted shop, whereas, thej on the later point of time have Mr. Tiwari, learned counsel petition may be disposed of with representation before respon^ grievances raised in this petitic directed to consider and decide In yiew of above submissi^n with liberty to the petitioner t^ grievances raised in this petitic period of ten days from today* resDondent No»2 is directed expeditiousiy preferably within a receipt of the representation, in However. Isbertv is resery^ Court if the cause of action stitl Certified copy as per ruies ^N^ft^w^^ fe^ xN^R ^? 3?^Rf 31T^ir ;rson who has deposited the amount , however, the petitioner has not persons who deposited the premium allotted shops. for the petitioner submits that this liberty to the petitioner to file fresh Bent No,2 for redressat of his ^n and in turn, respondent No.2 be same expeditiously. i, the instant petition is disposed of make representation raisin9 atl the n before respondent No.2 within a lOn such reDresentation beina made, to consider and decide the same jperiod of six weeks from the date of bccordance with law. fed to the Detitioner to oDproach the $urvives. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ^t^c?^ ^^P?^rr^<I^K'»rc(-—Fs/9S—i i /2008—i,00,000, ^