IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.123 of 2009 ANUPMA W/O SRI SUSHIL KUMAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NARAULISEN P.O. BINDA P.S. MUSHAHARI DISTT. MUZAFFARPUR. ………PETITIONER. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2.THE COMMISSIONER CUM- SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT BIHAR, PATNA. 3.THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT RAJ BIHAR, PATNA. 4.THE COLLECTOR MUZAFFARPUR. 5.SRI VISHWA MOHAN PRASAD SINGH S/O-NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER THE DISTRICT PANCHATAT RAJ OFFICER MUZAFFARPUR. 6.THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, EAST MUZAFFARPUR. 7.THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER MUSHAHRI MUZAFFARPUR. 8.THE GRAM PANCHAYAT SUPERVISIOR CUM NODEL OFFICER, MUSHAHARI BLOCK MUZAFFARPUR. 9.THE SARPANCH GRAM KACHHARI NARAULI MUSHAHARI MUZAFFRARPUR. ……………RESPONDENTS. ---------- 4. 29.11.2010 Annexure-7(1) is the appointment letter of the petitioner as Secretary Gram Kutchahary dated 13.9.2008. On that appointment letter itself, there is an endorsement made by District Panchayat Raj Officer, on the same date, cancelling her appointment on the ground that her husband and father had acted indecently and impolitely. Formal order was also issued by the District Panchayat Raj Officer on the same day, which is Annexure-7. These two documents show that on the ground of some indecent and impolite behaviour of father and husband of the petitioner, her appointment was being cancelled. 2 If the conduct of the father and the husband of the petitioner was not proper, remedy with the authorities was to institute a case and/or take any other action against them. But due to their conduct the appointment of the petitioner does not become bad in law. In the circumstances, the cancellation order of appointment of the petitioner as contained in Annexure-7 and as endorsed on Annexure-7/1 is quashed. The petitioner is directed to be reinstated in service forthwith with consequential benefits. The writ application is disposed of. Devendra/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)