^r'~"^"^. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BJLASPUR WRIT PETITSON (S) N0. 6850/2010 PETSTSONER Gangaram S/o Muichand Shrivastava, Aged about 49 years, R/o years, R/o A/p Khogsara, The. - Kota, Distt.- Bitaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through- Secretar/ Forest Dept. D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chief Conservator of Forest Biiaspur Cirde, Bilaspur(C.G.) 3. Djyisiona! Forest Officer Marwahi Division, Distt. Bliaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITSON UNDERARTSCLE 226 OF THE CGNSTITUTION OF INDiA ADpearance: Mr. S.P. Ka!e, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sunlta Jain, Advocate for the State. ORALORDER (26.11.2010) SUNSL KUIV3AR SINHA.J. Heard. Grievance ofthe petitioner in the pre^ent petition is that though he is working as daiiy wager since 1S87 but tiii date he has not been regularized. it has been further submitted by the petltioner that number of simiiariy placed persons have been regularized pursuant to the various circulars issued by the State of Chhattisgarh but the case of the petitioner has not been considered till date. He submits that numbers of representations have been made by the petitioner but no reiief has been grantedtohim. Counse! for the petitioner submits that ends of justice would be served if the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to make representation before respondent No.1 & 2 and the said respondent be directed to decide the representation as expeditiousiy as possibie. State counsel has no objection if any such representatlon is being made and the same is decided In accordancewith iaw. Accbrdlngiy, the petition is dismlssed as withdrawn with the iiberty as aforesaid. in the eventuaiity of filing representation by the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order, it is expected from the competent authority to decide the sarne in accordance with iaw within a further period of four months. it is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authorlty concerned wouid be at iiberty to decide the same strictiy in accordance with iaw. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge