IN kE HIGH C)Ur{T OF dTAt AL’ BANGtOOicE D1FND LCd ThE 5th DAY CF JUNE, 1998 ThE HN’BLE JUsflCE CHANuWsEkanIAP WEcIT P:flrION No, 30057 uF 199S BETNECIN: 4r • K.N .Jayaprakash Aged about 44 ye.irs, No.174/40, LF.Main Rodd, 22nd Cross, 111 Bioc, Jayangar, !3Qrçalore— 11. •• Petitionef, (3.K.sanpat rcwndr,Ad,for etitioner,) The Coinissioner, Bangalore City Corporation 1 3ang ore, The ‘ ,t.Exeoutive Engineer, Jayragdr Sub—Division, Bangalore City Corporation, 2azai Jayanagar,Bangaiore. •. Nesponstents. (By 3ri.S,u,3undark ar for Res&ndents 4 , / A) ‘1 —2— Writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, with an atfidavit, praying to aath the notices dt;J.O.7.95 issued by the R—2 wide Anneaaare-’E’ and notice issued by the R-2 wide Annacaree’P’. and ct. 1t Writ petition is caning on for this day the Court aisde the following: The petitioner has challenged the - order passed by the Corporation U/s.321(1), (2) & (3) of the Irnataka Municipal Corpo rations act.(for short the Act) on the ground that the order passed tI/s. 321 (3) of the Act is without any notice pursuant to the provi sional order passed tI/s.321(1) & (2) of the Act. 3. a3e This fact is not disputed. Therefore, the final order pissed J/s.321(3) of the Act — is liable to oe quashed. In the result, I pass the following order; Itit petition i. allowed. The order passed cy the Corporation U/s. 321(3) of the aot,quathed. Itwever, ta p titioner is given liberty to tile objections to the provitonai. order within one month from - today. If such objections are filed, the Corporation is at liberty to pass final - oreer after considerin the oojections nd after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. sa/—Jiun ss. r.by:’ ‘‘ - C ‘t cby: en S