AJN 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.1596 OF 2005 Union of India ... Petitioners Vs. Ashok Kumar Lal & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. S.M. Shah with Mr. H.V. Mehta and Mr. Y.R. Mishra i/b Dr. T.C. Kaushik for the petitioners. Mr. P.A. Sawant with Mr. S.R. Garud i/b M/s. Khaitan & Jaykar for respondent 1. Mr. R.M. Savant, Government Pleader for respondent 3. CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & S.J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATED : 2ND FEBRUARY, 2006. P.C.:- 1. This petition is placed before us for speaking to the minutes of order dated 17/1/2006. In the said order dated 17/1/2006, the name of Mr. Sureshkumar has been shown as advocate appearing for the petitioners. Instead, the appearance of the petitioners may be read as follows : AJN 2 “Mr. S.M. Shah with Mr. H.V. Mehta and Mr. Y.R. Mishra i/b Dr. T.C. Kaushik for the petitioners.” 2. The appearance of Mr. R.M. Savant, the Government Pleader should also be added in the said order dated 17/1/2006 as counsel for respondent 3. 3. The reference to Mr. Sawant in paragraphs 4, 5 and 7 of the said order dated 17/1/2006 be understood as reference to Mr. P.A. Sawant appearing for respondent 1. 4. Mr. Mehta, the learned counsel for the petitioners states that a copy of the affidavit, referred to in paragraph 5 of the order dated 17/1/2006, was not served on him, which Mr. Sawant, the learned counsel for respondent 1 disputes. We, however, clarify that during the argument, the said affidavit was referred to. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.]