[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.6512 OF 2006 Smt. Kanta Kapoor wd/o Dinanath Kapoor & Ors. .... Petitioners Vs. Smt. Rajkumari Triloksingh Gund & Anr. .... Respondents Shri Yogeshwar S. Bhate for the Petitioners. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: OCTOBER 04, 2006 P.C: P.C: P.C: The learned Advocate for the petitioners, on instructions from the petitioners, states that while reserving the petitioners’ right to challenge the impugned order at the time of challenge to the final judgment in case it happens to be adverse to the petitioners, the petitioners crave leave to withdraw the petition. The learned Advocate also requests for an observation that the lower Court should not get influenced by the observations made in the impugned order while disposing the appeal finally. Indeed, in the impugned order there are unwarranted observations while dealing with the application for amendment of the written statement. Needless to say that the lower Court should not be influenced in any manner by any of the observations made in the impugned order while deciding [2] the matter on merits finally. With these observations, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn with the liberty as stated above. The petition accordingly stands disposed of. (R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.) sjs/104wp6512.6 sjs/104wp6512.6 sjs/104wp6512.6