[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.2957 OF 2008 Ganesh Vijay Tale ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.V.V.Purwant advocate for applicant Mr.Rajesh More A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : SEPT. 24, 2008 DATE : SEPT. 24, 2008 DATE : SEPT. 24, 2008 IN CHAMBER AT 2.35 P.M. IN CHAMBER AT 2.35 P.M. IN CHAMBER AT 2.35 P.M. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The prosecutrix-original complainant Sushma is present in Court. 2. The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in CR No.216 of 2008 of Vijapur Naka Police Station, Dist. Solapur. The said case is mainly under Section 376 of IPC. 3. The prosecutrix was about 20 years at the time of the incident. On the last occasion i.e. on [-2-] 11.9.2008, the prosecutrix has stated before the Court that she had no grievance against the applicant and in fact she and the applicant have got married. The learned APP on instructions states that the prosecutrix is residing happily with the applicant. The prosecutrix has stated that if the applicant is taken into custody, there would be no one to look after her and she would be on the streets. She has therefore, prayed that above CR No.216 of 2008 may be quashed. She has tendered affidavit to that extent which is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. 4. In view of the above, the CR No.216 of 2008 of Vijapur Naka Police Station, Dist. Solapur is quashed. 5. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V [SMT.V [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J K.TAHILRAMANI, J K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]