IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH JANUARY 2009 / 8TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 2842 of 2009(L) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- AZEEZ.V.A, S/O ALIYAR,VELANTE PARAMBIL HOUSE,WEST KADUNGALLUR,ALUVA-10. BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/01/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 2842 OF 2009 (L) ==================== Dated this the 28th day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T By Ext.P1 petitioner's application for renewal of regular permit has been deferred with a direction to issue temporary permit under Section 87 (i)d. Petitioner states that the vehicle covered by the original permit has become dilapidated and therefore he has offered a new vehicle, which he took on lease and on that basis made Ext.P3 application for temporary permit. Petitioner contends that Ext.P3 application is not considered and order is not passed contrary to the direction in Ext.P1. 2. As already noticed, Ext.P1 contains a direction to issue temporary permit to the petitioner under Section 87(i) (d) pending consideration of his application for renewal of permit and hence Ext.P3 deserves to be considered. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 in the light of Ext.P1 decision of the RTA. Orders as above shall be passed as expeditiously as possible. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp