/9C7Iarazf‘ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHA‘I‘rISGARH WRIT PETITIoNKNoNQ9‘3 5) 2/2008 AK PETITIONER (/7 G.N.Tiwari, S/o. Late Shri Sunder Lal Tiwari, aged 58 years, resident of Janpad Quarter, In front of Police Station, Main Road, Kondagaon, district Bastar (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTQL Lyéhhattisgarh State Ware Housing Corporation, through Chairman, SQ-22 Anand Nagar, Mahasamund s§ oV 5i «9 \ O€>g$ @>\\:;Qo$ 2. VManaging Director, Chhattisgarh ¢$ )6}? State Ware Housing Corporation, §$ ‘ a . sQ—22, Anand Nagar, (i/ Mahasamund Road, Raipur (C.G.). Road, Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON (S) No. 3932 ofzoos WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agmhotn, J. Present: Shri Rahul Jha, Advocate for the petmoner Shn B D Gum Advocate for the respondents ORAL ORDER (Passed on 26E; day of March, 2010) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage, however, the pending appeal dated 30.04.2002 (Annexure P/4) which has not been decided till‘ date, may be directed to be considered and decidedas expeditiously as possible. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the pending appeal as aforestated, which atter bifurcation of the M.P. State Warehousing Corporation has come to the State of Chhattisgarh, shall be considered and decided in accordance with law on its own merits and perspective, as expeditiously as possible,,preferably within a period of six weeks dom the date ofpeceipt ofa copy ofthis order. In View ofthe foregoing, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication at this stage. Accordingly, the wrrt petition 1s disposed of / «i;,,,,, Satish K udge PETITIONER z G.N.Tiwari. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : Chhattisgarh State Ware Housing Corporation & another.