I'y ii , ..^•'S'£;' .- .[^1 iit? -i'.'i'a 3 'iL? t- / 6-3c:7e%^ S.B. (Service Matteri IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARHt WRITPETITIONNO.^-<3l1c /2006. ~A7 PETITIONER: ShukKRam Sahu, S/o Chatur Singh Sahu, aged about 48 years, Senior Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Kisora, ^t' \n..;-,V^- ...••' B.D. Office- Beria, Bemetara, Durg, ..*'" e6:-^y ,...•:-,,^- Chhattisgarh. ^.0-' ^ •?-•• <?..' VERSUS y'.^-- <^ Respondents ^ 1. State of Chhatdsgarh, Through The Secretary School Eklucation Department Ministry D.K-S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. .- 2. Director of School Education Office, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ^3. The District Education Officer, Bemetara, Through Block Development Education Officer, Saja, Durg, Chhatdsgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTmJTION OF INDIA ^ ^ ^.^' -^l i V: HI6H COURT OF CHHATTES6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (s) No. 4995 of 2006 Petitioner Shukh Ram Sahu Versus State of Chhati-isgarh & others Single Beneh: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. Shri O.P. Sahu, Advocnte for the Petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel lawyer for the respondents/State. Oft&Eft >+h (12ffl September, 2006) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that while working as Assistant Teacher, the petitioner has gone on training to improve his quatifications on his own expenses and acquired B. Ed. Examination Certificate on 29.7.1997 from Pt. Ravishankar Shukta University, Raipur. 2. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to two advcnce increments in view of the decision of this Court in the case of yashwont Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipa! Corporation, Durg and another {2006 CCI) MPJR-CG 96}. This Court in the case of ya^iwant Kumar Bhariadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), came to the conclusion that the teachers, who obtained B. Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses, are covered by the circular dated 24.12.98 (Annexure P/l) issued by the State ©overnmentof Madhya Pradesh 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the facts and question of !aw involved in the present case are squarely covered by decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipa! Corporation, burg and another (Supra), to which iearned counsel appearing for the respondents fairly concedes and agrees with the averment made. by Isarned counse! dppesring for the petitioner. 4. AccordEngly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order pexssed in the case of yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B. Ed. Examinal-ion Cert'ificate on his own expenses or not. No order as to costs. Thakur Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge