THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.9000 OF 2010 Dated 21st July, 2010 Between: Kangala Sathyam …Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh and two others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri Andapalli Sanjeev Kumar Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Mines and Geology The Court made the following ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents herein in not issuing the waybills to enable the petitioner to conduct the sand quarry operations from Godavari River of Sarapaka Sand Reach, Burgampahad Mandal, Khammam District though his lease is subsisting for a period of 86 days from 17.04.2010 onwards in pursuance of memo No.12668/SPIU & Sand/2009-2 issued by the 1st respondent and in view of the lease amount proportionate to 86 days is pending credit to his account as arbitrary, illegal and unjust, violative of fundamental right guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India and contrary to A.P. Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966 and consequently direct the respondents to issue way bills for a period of 86 days to the petitioner enabling him to quarry sand from Godavari river of Sarapaka Sand Reach, Burgampahad Mandal, Khammam District, in pursuance to Memo No.12668/SPIU & Sand/2009-2 dated 17.04.2010.” At the hearing, Sri Andapalli Sanjeev Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP No.11630 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 21st July, 2010 vrn