IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12545 of 2010 DHARMENDRA KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 31.03.2011 The writ application is filed by the petitioner because he has not been paid his remuneration for the so called period which, he has worked as the Panchayat Shiksha Mitra. It appears that his contract was not renewed after eleven months because his initial engagement was found to be faulty against wrong roster point. However it is also evident that the petitioner was allowed to work for eleven months. No decision has been taken by the authorities with regard to his entitlement for the period he had worked. Annexure 4 is an application filed by the petitioner in this regard addressed to the District Superintendent of Education, Nalanda at Bihar sharif. Since the issue of non payment of remuneration of eleven months has not been settled, let the D.S.E. look into the claim of the petitioner and communicate the decision within a period of three months from the date of production of copy of this order. This application is disposed of. Namita ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J .)