CR No.3066 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.3066 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.5.2010 Sarwan Singh ..Petitioner. Vs. Amar Kaur and others ..Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.Atul Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 25.3.2010 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Divn.) Kapurthala by which evidence of defendant No.1 has been ordered to be closed and the case is now fixed for rebuttal evidence and arguments on 18.5.2010. Counsel for the petitioner has prayed for grant of one opportunity to lead his entire evidence on 18.5.2010. However, he could not point out any error in the order of the Court below who has recorded that on 15.9.2009, the petitioner had given a written undertaking to conclude his evidence at his own risk and responsibility failing which it was agreed that his evidence should be closed. But still thereafter, he availed five further opportunities subject to payment of costs to the Legal Aid but still no witness on his behalf was examined. In view of the above, I do not find any error in the order of the Court below nor could I grant opportunity to the petitioner just for the sake CR No.3066 of 2010 (O&M) -2- of it that he would lead his evidence on one day. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed. No costs. (Rakesh Kumar Jain) 11.5.2010 Judge Meenu