IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. 48234-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION : 12.10.2006 Leelawati .... PETITIONER Versus State of Punjab ..... RESPONDENT CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. Harsh Kinra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Gill, AAG, Punjab. Petitioner Leelawati, apprehending her arrest in a non-bailable offence in case FIR No. 100 dated 31.5.2006 under Sections 307/324/323/ 34 IPC, registered at Police Station Samrala, District Ludhiana, has filed this petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the grant of anticipatory bail. I have heard counsel for the parties and have gone through the contents of the FIR. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner, who is a lady, is not alleged to have caused any injury to any of the injured persons, states that in terms of the interim order dated August 18, 2006, the petitioner has joined the investigation. This fact has not been disputed by the State counsel and he further states that the petitioner is no more required for further investigation. In view of the above, without commenting on the merits, the interim bail, granted vide order dated August 18, 2006, is made absolute subject to the same terms and conditions. Crl. Misc. No. 48234-M of 2006 -2- This bail order shall remain in operation till the investigation culminates into filing of challan under section 173 Cr.P.C. except for material change in the circumstances. Thereafter the petitioner shall be entitled to the grant of regular bail by the trial court and the same shall further continue till conclusion of the trial on the conditions to be imposed by the court of competent jurisdiction. Disposed of accordingly. October 12, 2006 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE