IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24633 of 2010 MURARI KUMAR @ MURARI SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 02-08-2010 Heard the parties. In a criminal prosecution for an offence under section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code as also under section 27 of the Arms Act, the petitioner and 08 other persons are named in the FIR as accused. It is submitted that even according to the prosecution case as disclosed in the F.I.R. (Annexure-1), co-accused Arbind Singh is specifically alleged to have fired upon the deceased, the brother of the informant, as a result of which he is said to have died. The petitioner and other accused persons are also alleged to be present at the place of occurrence. By referring to Annexure-2, it is submitted that co- accused Shashi Kant Singh, with almost similar and identical allegations with that of petitioner, has already been granted bail by a Bench of this Court. The petitioner is said to be in judicial custody since, 30.1.2010. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 468/09, subject to the conditions that (a) one of the bailors must be 2 government servant or close family members of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit in the court below showing his/her relationship with the petitioner; (b) if the petitioner is found involved in same and similar nature of case in future, then in that case the informant/prosecution shall be at liberty to file a petition for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner, and if such a petition is filed, the court below would be obliged to dispose of the same in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned. Sujit (Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)