IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2 OF 2006 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.88 OF 2005 Abdul Wahid ...Applicant Versus Senior Inspector of Police & Anr. ...Respondents ...... Mr.H.E.Palwe for Applicant. None for Respondents. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. FEBRUARY 15, 2006. FEBRUARY 15, 2006. FEBRUARY 15, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The explanation offered in the Application is unacceptable. However, as the litigant should not suffer for the mistake of the Advocate, this Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) in the interest of justice, on condition that the Advocate on record for the Applicant shall personally pay cost quantified at Rs.500/- (Rupees : 2 : Five Hundred) to the High Court Legal Services Committee, failing which, Office to proceed on the assumption that the present Application is dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the Court. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.