IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 951 of 2011. Decided on: 7th March, 2011. Bachhu Lal. ….Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others. … . Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr. V.B. Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner has filed this petition mainly with the following prayer: “(i) That the respondents may be ordered to grant ‘prorata’ pension to the petitioner from the due date with all the benefits incidental thereof.” 2. It is seen that the issue, in principle has already been decided by this Court by various judgments and one judgment is in CWP(T) No. 5728 of 2008. It is not in dispute that the principle has been accepted and the judgment has been implemented. In case, the petitioner is similarly situated, the petitioner may not be discriminated. 3. Therefore, there will be a direction the 2nd respondent to look into the matter and take appropriate action, without discriminating the petitioner, within 4 months, on production of copy of this judgment alognwith the copy of the writ petition by the petitioner. 2 4 The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 7th March, 2011. (Justice Sanjay Karol), (tr/vt) Judge.