IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY TUESDAY, THE 20TH DECEMBER 2011 / 29TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 35430 of 2004(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- TOLIN TYRES PRIVATE LIMITED, III/25-B, M.C.ROAD, MATTOOR, KALADY 683 574. REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, K.P.VARKEY. BY ADV. SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR SRI.A.K.JAYASANKAR NAMBIAR SMT.PRIYA MAHESH SMT.PRIYA MANJOORAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, KALADY 683 574. 3. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL CIRCLE, PERUMBAVOOR. BY ADVS. SRI.KODOTH SREEDHARAN, SC, KSEB SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC FOR KSEB FOR R1-R3 SRI. SANTHALINGAM, SC FOR KSEB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ds WP(C).No. 35430 of 2004(P) APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 13.05.04 SANCTIONING POWER ALLOCATION TO THE PETITIONER UNIT. P2: COPY OF THE ORDER B.O.NO.TCI/9515/88 DATED 09.09.1988 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT. P3: COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 1.10.1988, B.O.NO.TCI/9515/88 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. P4: CPY OF THE ORDER DATED 12.01.1994, B.O.NO.45/94(PLG.COM.2439/93) PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT ALONG WITH ANNEXURES I AND II. P5: COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 10.09.1997,B.O.NO.TCI/9515/88 PASSED BY THE DEPUTY SECRETARY IN CHARGE OF THE KSEB. P6: COPY OF THE ESTIMATE CHARGES ALONG WITH STATEMENT, NO.PB-5/04- 05/KLD 702, DATED 20.10.04 FROM THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. P7: COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 27.11.2004 PETITIONER SENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT, NO.TTPL/KSEB/2004 ALONG WITH ANNEXURE. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: R2(A): COPY OF THE LETTER TO SRI. JOHN GEORGE DATED 13.05.04 BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE B.P.RAY, J. - - - - - - - - - - W.P.C. NO. 35430 OF 2004 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 20th day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the Board. 2. Grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner has filed an objection to Ext. P6 Estimate given by the respondents which is still pending before the authorities concerned. The petitioner has paid the estimated amount under protest. 3. Therefore, respondent shall pass an appropriate order on Ext. P7 representation within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. I have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. B.P. RAY, JUDGE. ds