IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 17313 of 2008 Between: Ramesh Chander Agarwal S/o.Late Kanyalal Agarwal R/o.H.No.1-1-87, Old Kothagudem Kothagudem,Khammam District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Joint Collector -cum-Additional District Magistrate Khammam 2 The Sub Divisional Magistrate -cum-Revenue Divisional Officer,Paloncha,Khammam District 3 The Tahsildar, Paloncha, Khammam District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more particularlyone in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not passing the orders either on the stay petition or on the main revision petition ﬁled by the petitioner herein againt the orders passed by the 2nd respondent in Rc.No.B/1771/2001 dated 17.5.2008 set asiding the orders passed by the 3rd respondent dated 6.12.2006 is illegal, void and opposed to Articles, 14,19,21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondents not to issue Pattadar Pass Books or title deeds in favour of the 4th respondent herein in respect of the land in Sy.No.477 to an extent of Ac.4.00 of Seetharampatnam village, Paloncha Mandal, Khammam District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MUMMANENI.SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.17313 OF 2008 ORAL ORDER: As against the orders dated 17.05.2008 of the second respondent- Revenue Divisional Oﬃcer, Paloncha, Khammam District, setting aside the orders dated 06.12.2006 passed by the third respondent-Mandal Revenue Oﬃcer/ Tahsildar, Paloncha, Khammam District, in issuing the R.O.R. passbook and title deed in favour of the petitioner in respect of the land in question, the petitioner states that he ﬁled revision, along with stay application, before the ﬁrst respondent-Joint Collector, but till date no orders thereon had been passed. Hence he ﬁled the present writ petition. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, and both of them agreed for disposal of the writ petition at the stage of admission with the following directions: The ﬁrst respondent-Joint Collector is directed to consider and dispose of either the main revision or the stay application preferred, by the petitioner, and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law expeditiously. Till such time, status quo obtaining as on today shall be maintained by the parties. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J. Date: 08.08.2008 VGSR