1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Criminal Jurisdiction) Thursday, the Twenty Second day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD)No.16926 of 2011 1 S.MUPPIDATHI 2 S.ANDAVARMAN 3 M.PERIASAMY :PETITIONERS / ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN -Vs- THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VEERAKERALAMPUDUR POLICE STATION, ALANGULAM TALUK, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. (CR.NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2011):RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. T.LAJAPATHI ROY, Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER:The Court Made the following order:- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 294 (b), 341 and 506(ii) I.P.C. in Crime No.Not Known of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and seek anticipatory bail. 2.Heard Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent State. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioners are ready to abide any conditions likely to be imposed against them and therefore, this petition may be considered. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that on the basis of the complaint given by the defacto complainant, petition enquiry is pending. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the nature of the offence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Shenkottai, Tirunelveli District and on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 7.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 22/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO: 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Shenkottai, Tirunelveli District. 2.-Do- Thro' The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tirunelveli. 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4.The Inspector of Police, Veerakeralampudur, Alangulam Taluk, Tirunelveli Dt. +1CC to M/S. T.LAJAPATHI ROY Advocate SR.No.45559. RP/27.12.2011/2P/6C. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD)No.16926 of 2011, Date:22/12/2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/