:1: :1: :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2 OF 2005 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.2 OF 200 APPEAL NO.2 OF 200 APPEAL NO.2 OF 2003 Sonal Rathod, Applicant. Vs. Kiran Rathod, Respondent. --- Mrs. Suhasini Mutalik,for the applicant. Mr.Uday Warunjikar, for the respondent. CORAM : S.B.MHASE & CORAM : S.B.MHASE & CORAM : S.B.MHASE & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 17, 2005. DATE : JANUARY 17, 2005. DATE : JANUARY 17, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard both sides. 2. The decree for divorce obtained by the wife is challenged by the husband. The wife has also challenged the said decree to the extent that her Stridhan property is not returned. Paper book has been filed by the wife and, therefore, a request is made that the matter should be heard. Under these circumstances, it is not possible to disturb the matter out of turn. However, matter is expedited. The civil application is disposed of. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) :2: :2: :2: :rrt/db-05/cam2-05