IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22572 of 2009 SURYA KUMAR SINGH, SON OF LATE RAMCHARITRA SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE EKAUNA, P.S. BARHARA, DISTT. BHOJPUR (ARA) ------- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. JULUM SINGH 3. JALIM SINGH 4. LAL BIHARI SINGH 5. AWADH BIHARI SINGH 6. KAMESHWAR SINGH ALL SONS OF LATE BHUBNESHWAR SINGH @ BAGHA SINGH, RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE – EKAUNA, P.S. BARHARA, DISTT. BHOJPUR. ----- OPPOSITE PARTY 1ST SET. 7. JAY RAM SINGH 8. JAY PAL SINGH BOTH SONS OF SIPAHI SINGH 9. JAY DAYAL SINGH 10. HAR DAYAL SINGH 11. RAJ DAYAL SINGH ALL SONS OF DEPUTI SINGH ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE – EKAUNA, P.S. BARHARA, DISTT. BHOJPUR. --- OPPOSITE PARTY 2ND SET. 12. JAY PRAKASH SINGH 13. SHEO PRAKASH SINGH 14. DEO PRAKASH SINGH 15. MINA DEVI ALL SONS OF LATE RAM HANA SINGH, W/O DIP NARAYAN SINGH ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE & P.O. – EKAUNA, P.S. BARHARA, DISTT. BHOJPUR. ----- OPPOSITE PARTY 3RD SET. 16. LALAN SINGH S/O LATE RAM DULAR SINGH 17. DHARICHHAN SINGH 18. SUBH NARAYAN SINGH BOTH SONS OF LATE GAUTAM SINGH ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE & P.O. EKAUNA, P.S. BARHARA, DISTT. BHOJPUR. --- OPPOSITE PARTY 4TH SET. ----------- 3. 12.7.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 20.1.2009 passed by the F.T.C.-I, Bhojpur, Ara, in Criminal 2 Revision No. 190 of 2005 by which it has refused to interfere with the order dated 14.6.2005 passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Ara, in Case No. 775 of 1971 in a proceeding under Section 145 Cr. P.C. which stood dismissed for default. Since this is a second revision in the garb of 482 Cr. P.C. and no patent illegality could be pointed out in the Revisional Court order, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The application is dismissed. However, if at any point in time, there is any apprehension of breach of piece, it will be open to the petitioner to file such an application before the Magistrate to initiate a fresh proceeding. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)