IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 12TH OCTOBER 2010 / 20TH ASWINA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 6466 of 2010() ----------------------------------------- CRIME NO.118/CR/2005 OF CBCID, KANNUR. .................... PETITIONER/ACCUSED ---------------------------------- JAYAKRISHNAN K.P., KUNHANPEEDIKA HOUSE, PANNIYODAN VEEDU, MEETHALE, PUNNAD, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.CIBI THOMAS RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT/STATE -------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT, CBCID, KANNUR. 2. STATE, REP; BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. R1 & R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR.M.S. BREEZ. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: rs. V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Bail Application No. 6466 of 2010 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 12th October, 2010 ORDER Petitioner who is the accused in Crime No. 118/CR/2005 of CB CID, Kannur for offences punishable under Sections 143, 247, 148, 448, 436, 427 and 153 (A) read with Section 149 I.P.C. and whose case is now pending before the J.F.C.M, Mattannur, as C.P. No. 41 of 2009, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Magistrate and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the Magistrate and files an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of, preferably, on the same date on which it is filed notwithstanding the pendency of non-bailable warrants of arrest against the petitioner. This Bail Application is, accordingly, disposed of. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) ani.