1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PAROLE PETITION NO.6197/2010 [DHAGAL NATH VS. STATE OF RAJ.] Date of Order: 06.10.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH TATIA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH CHANDRA JOSHI Mr. J.R.Chawel, for the applicant petitioner Mr. K.R. Bishnoi – Public Prosecutor ***** Petitioner moved an application for first parole as he has completed 1/4rth of his sentence. Petitioner's said prayer was rejected by the Parole Committee in its Meeting dated 17.05.2010 on the ground that number of cases are pending against him and there is an apprehension that the petitioner may influence the witnesses. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this Bench in D.B. Criminal Parole Petition no. 4914/2010 Satya Narain Vs. State of Rajasthan decided on 30.08.2010 granted parole to the said petitioner Satya Narain. A bare perusal of the order dated 30.08.2010 revealed that facts of the case of Satya Narain which are lodged against him were already taken note by this Court and thereafter relief was granted by this court wherein facts of this case are different from the case of Satya Narain and facts of this case should have already been noticed above. Learned Public Prosecutor has shown the details of the cases pending against the petitioner and we found that total 5 2 cases were registered against him and in one of the case under Section 302 Ipc and 201 IPC and petitioner has been sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and in this case petitioner is seeking parole. The petitioner has already been convicted in the Year 2002 for commission of offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326 IPC and has been awarded sentences of one year with fine and in 3 other cases petitioner is facing trial and one of which is a case under Section 224 IPC In view of the above conduct of the petitioner and looking to the pendency of the criminal cases we are not inclined to interfere in the order of rejecting petitioner's prayer for parole by the Parole Committee and even when petitioner was released on temporary bail which was granted because of cancer to petitioner's mother, therefore, at this stage petitioner is not entitled to any relief. Hence the parole petition filed on behalf of petitioner Dhagal Nath is rejected. [KAILASH CHANDRA JOSHI],J. [PRAKASH TATIA],J MAMTA