IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH F.A.O. No. 19-M of 2008 Date of decision: 26.03.2009 Bahadur Singh ...Appellant Versus Amandepp Kaur ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. I.S.Brar, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Anish Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. In terms of the order dated 04.03.2009, the parties are present in person in the Court today. I have spoken to the parties. The resumption of ties between them does not seem to be a feasible proposition. The appellant – husband had filed a plea for the restitution of conjugal rights which came to be negatived by the learned Trial Court. The respondent – wife states that she just cannot resume cohabitation with the appellant – husband as she cannot undergo (dowry related) mental and physical torture anymore. She is very plain when she says that she, in any case, would not resume matrimonial ties with the appellant – husband. In the face of that categorical averment made by the respondent – wife, learned counsel for the appellant – husband states that the present appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn. He reserves liberty to file a plea for divorce on the basis of the categorical disinclination on the part of the respondent – wife to resume matrimonial ties. Dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty aforementioned. March 26, 2009 (S.D.Anand) vinod Judge