IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26236 of 2010 RAJEEV KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR THRU.C.B.I. ----------- 2. 28.7.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the C.B.I. This is the second attempt by the petitioner after his earlier prayer for anticipatory bail was rejected by order dated 29.1.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No.56568 of 2007. No fresh materials have been brought on the record so as to reconsider the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to deposit the amount under protest to the extent of the alleged loss caused to the Insurance Company by the hands of the petitioner and on similar condition the co- accused, Ashok Kumar Sinha, is enjoying the privilege of bail. This Court does not consider it a fit case to reconsider the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. The application for anticipatory bail is, accordingly, dismissed. However, if the petitioner approaches the - 2 - Court below with the prayer for bail including the intention to deposit under protest the alleged amount of wrongful loss caused to the Insurance Company, the Court below shall consider the same keeping in view the fact that the co-accused, Ashok Kumar Sinha, has already been granted the privilege of bail. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J. )