&"'0& ^ t?^ » HI@H COURT OF CH HATTtSGARH: BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 797 of 2003 Petttioner Smt. Radha Bat Pathak, age 57 y®airs, wsdow of Late Shri Bharat Narayan Pathak, resident 6f 14F, St.9, Sector 4, Bhilai, Tehsil and Distrtct Durg (CG). Respondents, Versus 1. Pramod Kumar Pathak, S/o. Late Shri Prakash Narayan Path^c, R/o. MK3 125. Padmanayiapur, Tehsit and District Durg (CG). 2. Pravin Kymar Patiwk, S/o, Prakash Narayan Pattiak, aged about 27 years, 3. Prafuil Kumar Pathak, S/o. Prafcash Narayan Pathak, bofh resldents of Laxml Narayan Nandir Ke Pass, Poisai F^ra, Durg, Tehsjt and District Durg (CG). 4. Smt. Prathibha Dixit, w/o. Shri AkWtesh Dixit, aged about 29 years, resident of Quarter No.14/8, Sactak No.37, Sector 4, Bhilaj Nagar, Tehsil and Distriet Duflg (CG). (Writ Petition under Artici®226/227 ofConstitution of tndia) SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Ms. Renu Kochar, counseJ for t!©petittoner. Mr. B.R. Gh^.h, counsei for the responderrts No. 2,3 snd 4. ORAL ORDER (Passed on thSs 3rd day of November, 2008) IANo.1. This Is an applteatton for taking documente on reoord, !t is ordered as prayed for. It is submitted by iearned counset app^ring for the parti^a that ttie petitioner has impugned th@ interim orders dated 7-2-2003 (Annexure P/1) and 7-2-20(^ (Annoaire P/1-A) passed by the IV Actditlonal District Judge, Durg. The main suits being CivJS Suit Nos.33-B/2001 and 34-B/2001 have aiready been disposed of on 14-5-20(^. Thus, nothing remains for actjudication in the matter. 2) The petition is accordingiy dtsmjssed as havtng t^con^ jnfructuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge