Crl.M. No. M-9439 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M-9439 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 11.10.2010 ... Sahil Kumar ................Petitioner vs. State of Punjab and another .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner Sh. Sudhir Nehra, Additional Advocate General, Punjab Sh. Raj Karan Singh, Advocate for the complainant- respondent No.2. ... K.C. Puri, J. This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing FIR No. 24 dated 26.2.2009, under Sections 353, 186 IPC, registered at Police Station Dhariwal, District Gurdaspur, on the basis of compromise. As per allegation of the prosecution, Sahil Kumar s/o Pawan Kumar who is resident of near DAV School, came to the school to help his brother Rahul in 10+2 examination. The lady staff tried to stop him and he used abusive language and pulled their hair and also Crl.M. No. M-9439 of 2010 -2- misbehaved with lady teachers. He also tried to break the gate of the school. Now, the parties are stated to have arrived at a compromise. The complainants have signed the compromise Annexure P-2. The main complainant is present in Court today and has stated at the Bar that the matter has been compromised. The petitioner is stated to be a student. Even if the trial is allowed to continue, the petitioner is not going to be convicted as the matter has been compromised. This Court vide order dated 10.3.2010 passed in Crl.M.No. M-15320 of 2009 has allowed compromise under Sections 353, 186, 506 IPC, in a similar situation. In authority reported as Manjit Sahdev and another vs. State of U.T., Chandigarh and another, 2006 (3) RCR (Criminal) 774, this Court allowed the compounding of offence under Sections 353, 379 IPC regarding theft of electricity, where the staff of electricity department was manhandled. So, in view of compromise and keeping in view above said authorities and authority reported as Kulwinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and others 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the abovesaid FIR stands quashed. Further proceedings, in pursuant to that FIR also stand quashed. ( K.C. Puri ) 11.10.2010 Judge chugh