IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.56559 OF 2007 RASHID RAZA, SONOF MD. ALI RAZA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JITWARPUR CHAUTH, POLICE STATION MUFFASIL (SAMASTIPUR), DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. ZEBA SHAHIN, DAUGHTER OF MUSHTAQUE SIDDIQUE, RESIDENT OF MUHALLA DHRAMPUR, UNDER TOWN P.S. AND DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR ……………………………………………………………………….OPPOSITE PARTIES ********* 2 02/04/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner has filed application challenging the order dated 06.10.2007 passed in Maintenance Case No. 93 of 2006 by which the Principal Judge, Family Court, Samastipur has directed the petitioner to pay to the Opposite Party No. 2 Rs. 800/- as KHARCHA i.e. compensation for her traveling expense etc. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that it is actually an imposition of cost. If it is imposition of cost, it is excessive and it should not be more than Rs. 500/- whereas payment under any other head is justified. I do not see any reason to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)