IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.174 of 2009 1. EJAZ AHMAD KHAN S/O LATE WASI AHMAD KHAN 2. IMDAD AHMAD KHAN SON OF IZHAR AHMAD KHAN 3. IZHAR KHAN @ IZHAR AHMAD KHAN SON OF LATE WASI AHMAD KHAN 4. IBRAR AHMAD KHAN SON OF LATE WASI AHMAD KHAN ---- PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. RAUSHAN AARA W/O MD. SHAMIM --- OPP. PARTIES. For the Petitioner : Mr. Md. Sufian, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ----------- 02 23.09.2010 Petitioners assail the order impugned whereby after recording conviction under minor Sections of the Penal Code the petitioners have been let off under the provision of Probation of Offenders Act (hereinafter referred to as the „Act‟) after admonition. Learned counsel for the petitioners draws attention of the Court to the provision contained in Section 12 of the Act which reads as under:- “12. Removal of disqualification attaching to conviction- Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law, a person found guilty of an offence and dealt with under the provisions of section 3 or section 4 shall not suffer disqualification, if any, attaching to a conviction of an offence under such law: Provided that nothing in this section shall apply to a person who, after his release under section 4, is subsequently sentenced for the original offence.” In that view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the order impugned. The application is disposed of. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)