IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 722 of 2007. Decided on: 23.3.2011 Hari Krishan ….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others. ....Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. T.S. Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 6. None for respondents No. 7 & 8. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Mr. T.S. Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge March 23, 2011. (hl) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.