1 WP 6742.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. WRIT PETITION NO. 6742 OF 2010 Mr. P.D. Bachate, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. S.T. Shelke, Advocate for the respondent no.1 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders P.C.:- 1. Heard. The petitioner has objected the nomination of the respondent no.2. It appears that the objection is not duly considered and decided as regards the suppression of certain facts. However, the petitioner is at liberty to agitate the grounds available to him by filing separate Election Petition, if so required, and if the respondent no.2 is elected from the ward. In view of “Vinod Pandurang Bharsakade Vs. Returning Officer, Akot and anr. 2003 (4) Mh.L.J. 359” the Petition is disposed of. It is made clear that no opinion is expressed on merits. Sd/- DT. : 28.07.2010 [V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp