IN THE HIGH COURT OF QHHATTISGARH AT SILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. ^^^/2005 PETITIONERS /...•••• ^ ^ •p^ • 4^^y /^/ y ^My ^y^y ^' c^; ^y ..^''x^' ^7 ^ ./ ^ ..<t ^ RESPONDENTS 1. Kanhaiya Lal S/o Rani Prasad Kaushik, Aged about-48 years, 2. Ashok Kumar S/o Kholbahara Kaushik Aged- About 25 Years 3/ Santosh Kumar Kaushik S/o Kholbahara Kaushik Aged- About 28 years. 4y/ Raj Kumar Kaushik S/o Ramadhar Kaushik Aged- about 32 years. 5^ Purshottam Das manikpuri S/o Churawan Das Aged- about 29 years. Suresh Kaushik S/o Rakhan Lal Aged- about 30 years I/ Manoj Kaushik S/o Shatrudhan Lal Aged- about 25 years /All the petitioners from 1 to 7 are the R/o Village- Deorikhurd Tahsil- Takhatpur P.0. Kathakoni, Distt. Bilaspur [C.G.] VERSUS The State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development .D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Collector, Bilaspur [C.G.] Sub Divisional Officer, (Revenue) Kota, Distt.- Bilaspur [C.G.] Tahsildar, Takhatpur, Distt.- Bilaspur Gram Panchayat, Deorikurd, Through- Sarpanch, Tahsil- Takhatpur, Distt.- Bilaspur /' 3, 4. / 5. / @ 4 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS/ORDERS AND DIRECTION XI-HC-22 3^«=qFlTora',^Td^^Ko, fa<ni^y 24 3TT^T <^C|l ^i^c^i $h^iicn^^Q^QM^^ 200 $"~ 3TT^T^)T R^i4)3TT^T ^W^^rf5cf 3TI^T?^TTWe{?cT <=bl^Id41^ ^l^dT^fte^i^l^K ^3Tf^T3TT^?T ^,, /'-- ^.- 25-7-2005 Shri Sanjay Patel, counse| Shri Yashwcint Singh Th respondents No.l to 4. Heard. The petitioners have pre 226/227 of the Constitution ^ petitioners is that their hou^ dispossessed by the Tehsild^ residing since last more than i(\ of Tehsildar, they made a Bilaspur who in turn by or<^ representation of the petiti^ rehabilitate the petitioners in a Learned counsel for the no action is being taken by the make a fresh representation I decide the representation in th passed by the Additional for respondents No.l to 4 has n Having heard learned cou to the facts and circumstanc allowed to meke a fr&^li repr for the petitioners. ikur, fiovt. Advoeate for the State/ repr^sentation Cotledtor :erred this writ petition under Article f India, The main grievance of 1+ie ?es were demolished dnd they were r from the land where they were years. Being aggrieved by the action to the Additional Collector, er dated 25th June 2005 on the ners djrected the 5-0.0. Kota to scordance with rules. ?etitioners submitted that thereafter 5-D.O., as such they may be allowed to 'o the S.b.0. and he be dlrected to light of order dated 25th June 2005 \ Bilaspur to which learned counsel 3 objection. ^l for the parties and having regard ^s of the case, the petitioners are liun lo ihe 5.&.0., KotQ^yttei^a e&rtluli XI-HC-22 CT^T^T ^Flt^STI^T ^m^^f'f?cT x' Barve '^f>K^^ '^ ^' 3^ r<4NlQl^, ^Tfl<141^, Rdiy^ } 3ll^l ^sich *11*IC<11 SftHT^fr ^ 200 Rrc^' ^TT^T ^•(TTW^T^ •^. period of 7 days raising all th^s directed to decide the same with law and also in complianc^ pas^d by the Additional t+ie application of the petil accordance with law, With the direction Consequently, M.(W. No.6219/2005also stand dispoi Parties are entitled for th^ir grievances cxnd the S.D.O,, Kota is wjthin a period of 30 days in accordance tian4 of the order dated 25th June 2005 Coll^ctor, Bilaspur directing him to decide lioners and to rehabilitate them in afordsaid, cbi^I<n41»t^i*i^iT^tel:A<f^t«K ^3:rf^T3TI^T |said, the petition stands dispos^d of. ^P. No.2682/2005 and I.A. iedof. ;ertified copy of this order< Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge (^^f^)