C482 No. 471 of 2010 Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J Shri Pawan Mishra, Advocate, present for the petitioner. Shri M.A. Khan, Brief Holder, present for the State. Heard. By means of this petition moved under section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short Cr.P.C) the petitioner has challenged the order dated 25.06.2009, passed by Judicial Magistrate-I, Dehradun, whereby the criminal complaint no. 1982 of 2009, is dismissed under section 203 of Cr.P.C. The petitioner has further challenged the order dated 03.03.2010, passed by Sessions Judge, Dehradun, in criminal revision no. 108 of 2009, whereby the order of the Magistrate is affirmed. In brief the allegations in criminal complaint filed by the petitioner are that the accused/respondents by misusing the power of attorney, executed sale deed in respect of plot no. 972 and plot no. 134. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Judicial Magistrate has erred in law in dismissing the criminal complaint under section 203 of Cr.P.C., and Sessions Judge have further erred in law in dismissing the revision upholding the order passed by the Magistrate. Perusal of the impugned order passed by the Magistrate shows that the Magistrate after recording statement of the complainant under section 200 Cr.P.C., and that of witness under section 202 Cr.P.C., found that the nature of dispute between parties is civil, and already a suit no. 451 of 2008 was pending before the Civil Court in the matter. In the circumstances, the Magistrate took the view that no criminal liability was attracted and the criminal complaint was dismissed under section 203 Cr.P.C. Learned Sessions Judge while dismissing the revision vide impugned order dated 03.03.2010, further made the facts clear. The said court has observed that in respect of plot no. 972 the parties are already in litigation in civil suit no. 451 of 2008 and in respect of plot no. 134 a separate criminal complaint no. 2029 of 2008 has already been entertained by the Magistrate and as such, the order of Judicial Magistrate-I, Dehradun, whereby criminal complaint no. 1982 of 2009, is dismissed, suffers from no illegality. On going through the aforesaid orders, this Court finds that the courts below have committed no illegality which requires interference of this Court in its jurisdiction under section 482 of Cr.P.C. The petition under section 482 of Cr.P.C., is dismissed summarily. (P.C.P, J) PV 09.06.2010