-" ®IN"3 LF(c^]^ IN THE HIGH COURT OP 3UDICATURE. AT BILASPUR fC.G.l W.P.fSl N0. ^£3^ /2006 PBTITIOBBR: ^ ^^y ^(A' -^ \^..-'t- ^^^ ..<• itS--' v^ .^&l- ^""' RE8POBDBMT8 VERSUS 1. Govardhan Slngh Kamal Son of Shrl Sldar Slngh Kamal, aged about 39 years, Occupatlon- Asst. Teacher, Govt. Primary Schoot Podldalha, Block Akattara Dtstt. Janjglr-champa (C.G.) State of Chhattlsgarh, through the Secretary Government of Chhattlsgarh Department of Educatlon, D.K.S. Bhawan Mantralaya, Ralpur (C.G.). 2. Dlrector Publlc Instructlon, Ralpur (C.G.) 3. Dlstrtct Educatlon Offlcer, Dlstt.-Janjglr Champa (C.G.) 4. Block Educatlon Offlcer, Akaltara, Dlstt.- Janjglr Champa (C.G.) 'vaai FKrrrKW UNDER ARTKXB 226 wss OF THE ooNSTmjnoN OF nmiA vcs. KSUANCB OF AFFROPRIATE ^arilculars of the Petitioner: XI-HC-78 3n^r^TR-ii+ craTSII^TSRTPR v' *11HWI ?tlJ4ieb 3:s?"4Wlct'i), »T(I+I'IS,Riiriiyy ri^^.y3.663.7./&.fc,. ^J ^ 200 3llSsi| i^ach (,1^3^^) s?aTW nfN'sn^r 05.12.2006 Shri Ajay Dwivedi, learn^d Shri Vinay Pandey, learrlei counsel for the petitioner. ed P.L. for the State/respondent. trte By this petition under Ai| the pstitioner seeks a direction) and seniority on the basis of of the decisiop rendered by Jabalpur in Original Applicatiorl others Vs.State oflUI.P. and ticles 226/227 ofthe Constttution of India, to the respondents to pay the increments date of his initial appointment in the light learned State Administrative Tribunal, No. 2745/1989 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 otl)iers)dated 24.8.1992 the 2. Learned counsel appear) order dated 9th October 2006 5473/2006 (Rakesh Kumar Sh^r and others) and in Writ Petitio|i State of Chhattisgarh and similarly situated, therefore, the| 3. The case of the petitiorfer Teacher in theSchool Educatickn two years with the fixed salary.l years' probation, the petitioner regular pay scale. Other simj Administrative Tribunal, Jabalplur Tribunal vide order dated 24.) made several representations Vp «bi<il<i<fl-< iitKiT ff teA <R]<<;|<. ^;3TJ^IT3n^T |ng for the petitioner placed retiance on the p|assed by this Court in Writ Petition (S) No. rma and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh (S) No. 5474/2006 (Jai Nath Bajpai Vs. others) and submits that the petitioner is Isimilar order may be passed. tt er is that he was appointed as Assistant Department on probation for a period of However, later on, after completion of Iwo was regularized but, he was not given the lariy situated teachers moved the State for regular pay-scale, wherein learned i.1992 allowed the same. The petitioner accord the same treatment as he is atso XI-HC-78 3TI^Tq)TR^i+ gwsn^rgiifw ¥- ,11 i.^ 7 3^? -i<ttiifi<<, eiTfttt'Koyfaioi^y UIK^I^RTriw^^-^^-3-7-^-^ 200 . 3n^?Tira9? (ggfgg^T) CTaraKHfsffsn^T <oi<<Fi-i''fl-t *<iHc]Tffte^t<R]wi< ^iSlf^ITSn^T similarly situated, but, the res()ondents have not paid any heed. Thus, this petition. trie 4. Learned counsel for be allowed to make a repre^i treatment to the petitioner ancf to other similarly situated te^i Administrative Tribunal datedl respondent/State has no obje(;tion 5. Having heard learned the facts and circumstances petitioner submits that the petitioner may entation to respondent No.1 to give similar same pay-scale which has been sanctioned chers on account of the order of the State 24.8.1992, to which learned counsel for the sounsel for the parties and having regard to rf the case, in the opinion of this Court, the limited prayer made by learn|ed counsel for thepetitioner appears to be reasonable. Therefore, the p^titioner is altowed to make a representation within a period of two weeks Ifom today to respondentNo.1 , raising all his grievances and, in turn, 1-espondent No.1 shall decide the said representation inan objective) manner within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of such rept)esentation, after considering all the points raised by the petitioner and t^ king into account the order dated 24.8.1992 passed by the learned State ^dministrative Tribunal in Original Application No. 2745/1989. 6. The writ petition is sjccordingly disposed of with the aforesaid direction. No order as to cost 7. Certified copy as per ri^les. Sd/- Dhirednra Mishra Judge ^ v