1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICAUTRE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICAUTRE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICAUTRE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION (60) CHAMBER CHAMBER CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 421 OF 2005 SUMMONS NO. 421 OF 2005 SUMMONS NO. 421 OF 2005 IN SUM. SUIT NO. 3306 OF 2004 Kaushalkumar G. Agarwal ... Plaintiff Versus Mumtaz Shaikh w/o. Mohd. Shafi Defendant And Piyush S/o. Kaushalkumar Agarwal and anr. ... Applicants Mr. D.S. Singhade i/by N.N. Vaishnawa for Plaintiff. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR,J. : A.M. KHANWILKAR,J. : A.M. KHANWILKAR,J. DATED DATED DATED : JULY 12, 2005 : JULY 12, 2005 : JULY 12, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Inspite of service, none appears for the opposite party. No reply is filed. The delay is only of 11 days. The averments made in the affidavit in support of the chamber summons has remained uncontroverted. Accordingly, Chamber summons made absolute in terms of Prayer Clauses (a), (a(i) and (b). Amendment to be carried out within four weeks from today. No order as to costs. (A.M. (A.M. (A.M. KHANWILKAR,J.) KHANWILKAR,J.) KHANWILKAR,J.)