IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.1811 OF 2009 CRI.APPLICATION NO.1811 OF 2009 CRI.APPLICATION NO.1811 OF 2009 Piyush Krishnapal Singh, .. Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra, . Respondent. Mr.A.P.Mundargi, Sr.Advocate, with Mr Pranav Badheka, for the applicant. Mrs P.P.Shinde, APP, for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 22/04/2009 DATE : 22/04/2009 DATE : 22/04/2009 PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the respondent. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.130 of 2009 of Chembur Police Station. The said crime has been registered against the applicant for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 307, 353, 427 read with 34 of IPC and sections 3, 25 and 27 of Arms Act. 3. It is the prosecution case that on 9.4.2009 the applicant and his son allegedly attempted to commit murder of the complainant-Shahbudin Dawood Pathan. The complainant, at the relevant time, was driving a bus. It is alleged that on 9.4.2009 at 11 am the bus was stopped by the applicant’s son, who was driving Maruti Swift car, because the complainant did not give him side and allowed him to overtake. He then got down from the car and got into the bus and went upto the complainant and started abusing him. He allegedly gave two slaps to the driver. Thereafter, he went back to his car. It is further alleged that the applicant, who was also sitting in the car,also got down and went upto the driver’s door and started banging the door and broke the mirror of the bus. Thereafter, the son of the applicant again got down from the car, went upto the driver with a revolver and allegedly fired one shot towards him which missed the complainant. It is on these allegations, the applicant and his son came to be arrested. Having considered overall facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegations against the present applicant and looking to the age of the applicant, I am satisfied, continuing detention of the applicant is not necessary.Hence, the following order. . The applicant is directed to be enlarged on bail in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or two sureties to make up the said amount, subject to condition that the applicant shall report to the concerned police station every Saturday between 6 pm and 7 pm till filing of the chargesheet. . The applicant is allowed cash deposit of the bail amount for a period of two weeks and thereafter to be substituted with surety of the like amount. . While passing this order I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. . The application is disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)