IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40129 of 2009 MD.YUSUF SON OF MD. SULEMAN @ SULLI MIAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-MOHALLAPAR, BARBIGHA, P.S. BARBIGHA, DISTRICT-DHEIKHPURA. --PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, 2. TABSSUM KHATOON, D/O SAUKAT ALI, WIFE OF MD. YUSUF, MOHALLA- FAIJABAD, P.S. BARBIGHA, DISTT.-SHEIKHPURA. --OPP.PARTRIES For the Petitioner : M/s Ajit Kr. Sinha & Raja Ram Sharma For the State : Mr.P.K. Pandey, APP For Opp.party no.2 : Mr. Birendra Kumar 4 21.06.2010 Heard. Petitioner is named accused in this case, being husband of the complainant, carrying allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. The complainant is disabled by one of her legs, since before her marriage. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to continue the matrimonial relationship with the complainant with all due respect and honour. Considering the facts and circumstances, in the event of petitioner filing an application before the court below 2 supported by affidavit to this effect that he shall take the complainant with him and lead matrimonial life with all due respect and honour, in the event of his arrest or surrender within three weeks from today, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Shiekhpura, in Complaint Case no. 213 C of 2008, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Simultaneously, it is further made clear that the court below shall have regular watch over the conduct of the petitioner calling the couple initially once in a fortnight for a reasonable period. In case of any genuine grievance raised by the complainant, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad