Civil Revision No. 5853 of 2011 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 5853 of 2011 Date of Decision: 23.9.2011 Haryana Gramin Bank ... Petitioner Versus Raj Kumar ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Vivek Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) In the present revision petition, a prayer has been made that the order dated 6.9.2011 (Annexure P2) whereby the petitioner/plaintiff's evidence was closed by order, be set aside and the petitioner be afforded an opportunity to examine two witnesses on the next date of hearing, at its own risk and responsibility. Learned counsel submits that in case one opportunity is granted to the petitioner, it will be able to project the case as set out in the suit and the same will not be dismissed in default for not leading necessary evidence. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the view that to ensure fair play and balance of equities, it will be appropriate in case one opportunity is afforded to the petitioner/plaintiff to examine two witnesses, namely Karnail Singh and one official from Civil Revision No. 5853 of 2011 2 the Bank, who was the Manager at the relevant time, at its own risk and responsibility. For having caused the delay, the petitioner is saddled with the cost of ` 2,000/-. With the observations made above, the present petition is disposed of. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge September 23, 2011 “DK”