IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 24TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 5TH PHALGUNA 1930 RP.No. 209 of 2009(T) --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN WPC.13181/2008 Dated 22/07/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- KUMARAN, S/O.KUJAYYAN,AMBAZHATHMYAL, AGED 58,PALLINAMKARA,THRIKKAKARA(N) VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM,REP. BY P/A HOLDER RAJEEV.A.K,AGED 38,AMBAZHATHIMYAL,PALLINAMKARA, THRIKKAKARA NORTH VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. AZAD MOOPPAN, S/O.M. AHAMMED UNNI MOOPPAN, AGED 55 YEARS, GOVINDAPURAM, CALICUT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, THRIKKAKARA NORTH VILLAGE, PATHADIPALAM, KALAMASSERY. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALAMASSERY POLICE STATION, KALAMASSERY, ERNAKULAM. ADV.P.GOPINATHA MENON ADV.P.K.SURESH KUMAR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.2.2009 A/W. R.P.NO.210/09 AND CONNECTED CASE, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== R.P.No.209/2009 in W.P(C).No.13181/2008; R.P.No.210/2009 & I.A.No.16397/08 in W.P(C).No.16957/2008 and R.P.No.223/2009 & I.A.No.16211/08 in W.P(C).No.26583/2008 ================== Dated this the 24th day of February, 2009 O R D E R After hearing both sides, I do not find any reason to review my earlier orders in the above writ petitions. Accordingly, the review petitions and interlocutory applications are dismissed. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge