THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.5843 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner feels aggrieved by the memo dated 28-07-2008 in which the Tahsildar, Kataram Mandal, the 2nd respondent, stated that, according to the physical enquiry, it is found that the 5th respondent is in possession of the land in Sy.No.139/1. The petitioner states that he was assigned an extent of Ac.1.02 guntas of land in Sy.No.139/1, and on the strength of the impugned memo, he is sought to be dispossessed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue. The 5th respondent has already filed O.S.Nos.3 of 2007 and 11 of 2009 in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Manthani, and the petitioner is party to that. The question of possession has to be independently adjudicated, and it shall be always open to the petitioner to prove his possession, on the strength of the assignment made in his favour. The impugned memo can, at the most, be treated as one of the documents, and it cannot be treated as the sole basis to decide the question of possession. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to work out the remedies in the pending suit. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ Dt.20-03-2009. L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. KO