IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO : 776 OF 2004 Between: D.Venkatramana Reddy, S/o.Venkata Swamy Reddy, Aged 49 years, Laxminagar Colony, Rompicherla V & M, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Deputy Registrar/Divisional Coop Officer, Madanapalle, Chittoor. 2 Rompicherla Primary Agricultural Coop Credit Society Ltd., CR No.211, Rompicherla Village & Mandal, Chittoor District, Represented by its PIC Chairman. 3 Sri SMD Khasim, Part time PIC Chairman of the Rompicherla Primary Agricultural Coop Credit Society Ltd., CR No.211, Rompicherla Village & Mandal, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Proceedings dt.30.12.2003 of the 2nd respondent herein i.e. Rompicherla Primary Agricultural Coop Credit Society Ltd., 211, Rompicherla Village and Mandal, Chittoor District represented by its Chairman PIC Committee through which the petitioner was placed under suspension as patent illegal, without jurisdiction, arbitrary, without application of mind, malafide, unjust besides being violative of the cardinal principles of natural justice and hence liable to be set-aside and pass such other order or orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.D.V.BHADRAM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.776 OF 2004 O R D E R There was no representation for the petitioner when this matter was listed for hearing on 28.08.2009 and thereafter, on 03.09.2009. The writ petition appeared today under the caption “For Dismissal”. But in spite of the same, the petitioner is unrepresented. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for non- prosecution. No costs. -------------------------- SANJAY KUMAR,J 11TH SEPTEMBER, 2009 PGS / VGSR