IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23656 of 2009 1. ANIL PASWAN, SON OF KISHUN PASWAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE FATEHABAD, P.S. PAROO, DISTT. MUZAFFARPUR. 2. SHRI KISHUN PASWAN, SON OF LATE BILASH PASWAN 3. RAJ KUMARI DEVI, WIFE OF SHRI KISHUN PASWAN 4. SUNIL PASWAN, SON OF SHRI KISHUN PASWAN 5. RITA DEVI, WIFE OF SUNIL PASWAN ALL ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – FATEHABAD, P.S. PAROO, DISTT. MUZAFFARPUR. ---------PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SURAJ PASWAN, SON OF LAL BIHARI PASWAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PANCCH, P.S. PAROO, DISTT. MUZAFFARPUR. --------- OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 2. 27.09.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order of cognizance dated 16.4.2008 passed by Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Muzaffarpur, in Paroo P.S. Case No. 70 of 2007, Trial No. 3161 of 2009 on the ground that during investigation a case under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code was made out and none under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code. In my view, this can be no reason for quashing the earlier case. The application is dismissed. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)