^l^'.^ ^' ^•Yf^[^*-"" ^s. A^ c^,''^^- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH ? ^o^ WRIT PETITON (S) No.^^ / 2^8 PETITIONERS : ^ Gopal Yadav^ S/o Shri Gajadhar Yadav^ aged about 52 years^ Post Senior Overmen.in S.E.C.L. Churcha Colliery, District-Korea (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS: 1. Chief General Manager, S.E.C.L. Baikuthpur Area, District-Korea (C.G.) . 2. Deputy Chief Personal Manager, S.E.C.L. Baikuthpur Area, District-Korea (C.G.) 3. ShriA.Kumar, Sub-Area Manager, Churcha Colliery^ District-Korea (C.G.) 4. Shri V.V. lyer, Electrical and Mechanical Engineer, Churcha Colliery., District- Korea (C.G.) - Enquiry Officer. ^^^f^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGHCQURTOFCHHATTISGARH:B|LASPU WRST PETITiON (S) N0.2689 OF 2009 PETITiONER RESPONDENTS Gopat Yadav Versus Chief Generai Manager, 8ECL & Others Gowrl (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) Singie Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Ms Anju Ahuja, Advocate forthe petitjoner. Ms Meera Jaiswai, Advocate forthe respondents. ORDER(ORAU (Passed on this 6th day of Aprij, 2010) 1) At the very outeet, learned counsel appearing for the petitSoner submits that the impugned order dated 2-4-2008 (Annexure - P/15) has been modified by the respondent authorities subsequently by order dated 4-7-2009 and, as such, the impugned order dated 2-4-2008 chalienged in the present petltion does not survive for adjudlcation. 2) }n view of foregoing, the writ petition is dismlssed as having become infructuous. However, tiberty is reserved to the petitioner to Impugn the subsequent order by fiiing a fresh writ petltion, if so advised. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge