IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 513 OF 2006 JOSE JACOME SALDANHA, PARRA, ....Petitioner BARDEZ GOA. Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF ....Respondents SECRETARY AND 3 ORS., Mr. Rohit Bras De Sa, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Winnie Coutinho, Govt. Advocate for respondents no.1 and 2. Coram:- J. N. PATEL & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 6th November, 2006 P.C. Heard. Leave granted to the petitioner to carry out amendment so as to correct the cause title and the prayer clause in so far as it relates to description of respondent no.2. Petitioner to forthwith carry out the amendment. The petitioner has come to this Court seeking a limited relief in the matter in respect of disposal of his petition pending with respondent no.2 within stipulated period. It is the case of the petitioner that he has filed a complaint under section 50 and section 52 of the Goa Town and Country Planning Act to initiate action by revoking and modifying the permission granted to respondent no.6 and to demolish the unauthorised development. The petitioner also filed a petition in the year 2005 i.e. Writ Petition No.116/05 which was disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2 to decide all issues in the Panchayat within a period of six weeks from 8.8.2005. On 16.9.2005, the Director of Panchayat has dismissed the Panchayat Appeal No.11/05, the matter is pending confirmation before the respondent no.2. Learned Advocate General has no objection if this Court passes appropriate order in the matter for expeditious disposal of the petition by respondent no.2 Therefore we direct respondent no.2 to dispose of the petition pending before him as expeditiously as possible, preferably within 3 months from the date of this order. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. The petitioner to communicate this order to respondent no.1. J. N. PATEL, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. ef.