*M HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH A'l‘ BILASPUR Writ Petition (S! No. 3405 of2005 Petm‘oner Sy'amm Versus Respondents State of Chhatljjsgarh 8a another EB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Amhuki, J Shn‘ Samar Sahu, Advocate for thE petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Government Advocate for the respondents. O R D E R (Passed on this 13th day ofF‘ebnxm-y, 2007) 1. By this petition, the petitioner, who has worke‘i for mom than 29 years as Gangman seeks a relief that the petitioner bemg permanent gangman be retimd at the age of 62 years in accordance with the Chhattisgarh Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivaxshiki-Ayu) Adhiniyam, 1967 ( for shalt ‘the Act, 19671 mad with Fundamental Rule (for short ‘F.R.’} 56. 2. The indisputable facts are that the petitioner was employed as gangman in the year 1978. Acconi'mg to learned counsel $r the petitioner, the petitioner attained the status of permanent employee, as defined under Rule 2(c) of the Chhattisgarh (Workcharged and Contingency Paid Employees) Pension Rules, 1979 ( for short ‘the Rules, 1979’), hamed under Article 309 of the Constitution of India, After having attained the status of the permanent employee the petitioner would retire on attaining the age of 62 years on superannuation under the provisions of the /’ Act, 1967. 3. Learned counsel aphearing for the petitioner would submit that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the decision of g?) Januaxy, 2007 in W.P. No. IOBIQOGS State of Chham'sgarh 85 othels) and other this Court. passed on 4th (Govind Vs. connected matters. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State does not dispute the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. Satish K. Agniho‘ri Judge