CW 2519/06 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2519/06 Vishwendra Singh Versus State & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 12/09/2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. Y.C. Sharma, for petitioner Mr. J.K. Agrawal, Addl. Govt. Counsel *** Instant petition has been filed by petitioner for his appointment on the post of Constable for District Sriganganagar advertised by the respondents for various Districts vide advertisement dt.14th June, 2005. Post of Constable is included in the schedule appended to Rajasthan Police Subordinate Service Rules, 1989. Respondents issued an advertisement on 14th June, 2005 inviting applications for various Districts for the post of Constable and for other post as well. Petitioner being eligible submitted application for the post of Constable for District Sriganganagar which is shown in the advertisement at Serial No.26. However, he was not finally selected, hence he approached this court by instant petition. CW 2519/06 [2] Respondents have filed reply to the writ petition wherein it has been averred that selections were made in terms of Standing Order No.6/05 dt.1st June, 2005 and according to which, the candidature of the petitioner was also considered and finally he secured 75 marks whereas the cut-off for last candidate was 76. As such, he could not be considered for appointment in pursuance of advertisement in question. It has been further averred that under Standing Order No.6/05 dt.1st June, 2005 so far as marks which are allocated for participation in Sports & Games is concerned, it was only considered if incumbent has participated wihtin last two years of the advertisement and since the petitioner participated at the State level in 1998 and advertisement is of 2005, as such, was not given one bonus mark for participation in Sports. Counsel for petitioner submits that earlier it was not in his notice about the criteria for evaluating overall assessment of the incumbents who have participated in pursuance of advertisement, but as he too participated in Sports, as such, became entitled for one bonus mark being represented at State level. Counsel has tried to challenge the conditions of last two years but there is no pleading to this effect in the writ petition, however, raised same CW 2519/06 [3] submission in rejoinder questioning the same but no amendment has been made in the instant petition, if at all, he felt aggrieved by the condition which has been restricted by the respondents in Standing Order No.6/05. According to which, the evaluation has been made of applicants who have participated in pursuance of advertisement in question. Apart from it, all applicants who participated they have been overall evaluated in terms of Standing Order No.6/05 dt.1st June, 2005 and authorities took decision that for Sports & Games candidates will get bonus marks only if participated within last two years, which cannot be considered to be unreasonable. This court finds no substance in the writ petition, the same stands dismissed. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA2519CW06 12-9.doc