CRP 350/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE ANIMA HAZARIKA The instant revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitut ion of India has been filed by the petitioner challenging the legality and valid ity of the impugned orders dated 16.6.07 and 28.8.07 passed by the learned Munsi ff No.1, Cachar, Silchar in TS No.144/06 whereby and whereunder the learned tria l Court rejected the prayer of the petitioner made in the petitions being No. 49 7/03, 1057/11 and 1053/12 calling for record of rent deposit cases till April, 2 006. Heard Mr. RP Sarmah, learned Sr. counsel assisted by Mr. MR Adhi kari, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. None appeared for the respo ndent when the case was called on for hearing. The brief facts of the case is narrated hereinbelow for determin ing the issue in question. The petitioners herein are the defendants in TS No.128/02 which was re-numbered as TS No.144/06 on the file of learned Munsiff No.1, Cachar, Sil char. The respondent herein is the plaintiff in the above suit who sought for a decree of eviction of the defendants from the tenanted premises on the ground of default of rent since February, 2002. The learned trial Court in pursuant to th e application dated 30.4.05 filed by the petitioner herein has already called fo r the records of rent deposit cases up to November 2002, which are available in the record of the title suit. In the title suit, during trial, the defendants/pe titioners are required to prove that they are not defaulter up to February, 2002 and not beyond. The court is to decide the suit on the basis of record already received. The defendants/petitioners by the aforesaid petitions have prayed for calling the records subsequent to the cause of action of the suit. The learned t rial Court has rightly rejected the prayer made by the petitioners for calling t he rent deposit cases till April 2006. There is no error of jurisdiction or mate rial irregularity committed in the exercise of jurisdiction by the learned court below warranting interference by the court. In the result, the revision petition being devoid of merit, the same is dismissed.