WPMS No. 1256 of 2009 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Shri Lok Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioners (defendants). Heard. By means of this petition, moved under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioners have sought quashing of order dated 05.02.2009, passed by the trial court (Civil Judge, Sr. Div., Ist F.T.C., Haridwar) in suit No. 206 of 1989, and order dated 21.03.2009, passed by the revisional court (Additional District Judge/IV F.T.C., Haridwar), in civil revision No. 29 of 2009, whereby the order passed by the trial court has been affirmed. Brief facts of the case are that plaintiff/respondent instituted suit in respect of property in suit, shown by letters I J K L in the plaint map, situated in Rishi Ashram, Bhopatwala Kalan, Haridwar, for injunction against the defendants (present petitioners). The petitioners’ contention is that during the pendency of suit, the plaintiff has transferred the property to a third party. And on its basis, application No. 160 C2, under Order VII Rule 11, read with Section 151 of C.P.C., was moved for rejection of the plaint. Both the courts below have rightly observed that since the cause of action in the suit is required to be seen on the date when the plaint was presented, therefore merely for the reason that during the pendency of the suit, the plaintiff transferred the property, does not make a ground for rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of C.P.C. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, and after going through the impugned order, this Court does not find any error of law, committed by the courts below. Therefore, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the suit, this petition is dismissed summarily. (Stay application No. 6743 of 2009, also stands dismissed). (P. C. P., J.) Dt. 06.08.2009 S