IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3652 of 2009 HARI RAM, SON OF LATE BANSHI RAM, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE + POST OFFICE + POLICE STATION NAWHATTA, DISTRICT ROHTAS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. SRI SUNIL BERTHWAL, THE COMMISSIOENR, PATNA DIVISION, PATNA. 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ROHTAS AT SASARAM. 4. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR(ESTABLISHMENT), ROHTAS (SASARAM). 5. THE CIRCLE OFFICER, ROHTAS BLOCK ROHTAS DISTRICT ROHTAS (SASARAM). ----------- 03. 29.06.2011 Counsel for the petitioner states that during the pendency of the contempt petition, orders of the High Court dated 1.9.2009, Annexure-1 has been complied with. In the circumstances, prayer made in the contempt petition has become infructuous, which is accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)