CWP No.352 of 2009. 29.6.2009. Present: Mr. Narender Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma and Mr. Anil Jaswal, Dy. Advocate Generals, for respondent No.1. Mr. D.K. Khanna, Advocate, for respondent No.2. The petitioner had disputed questions No.36, 46 and 146. According to the reply filed by respondent No.2, the report was called from the Examiner. The Commission after receiving the report from the Examiner has re-drawn the merit list by deleting/ignoring the disputed questions No.36 and 146. Mr. Khanna has also supplied the comparative statement in respect of revised result of lecturer (College cadre) in Commerce subject qua five more candidates. It is clearly averred in the reply filed on affidavit that the merit list was re-drawn by deleting/ignoring the disputed questions No.36 and 146 and it was found that there is no material change in the merit list already drawn by the Commission. Accordingly, in view of the averments contained in the reply filed by respondent No.2 to which no rejoinder has been filed, there is no merit in the writ petition and the same is dismissed. (Jagdish Bhalla), C.J. 29th June, 2009. (Rajiv Sharma), J. (tr)