IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23701 of 2009 RANJEET RAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 21.8.2009 Heard. Of course, the petitioner’s name appears in the FIR but the reason has been assigned during the course of argument for naming the petitioner in it and that is that the houses of the petitioner and that of the sister of the informant was situated side by side and there could be some differences between them. It was further contended that the recovered cloths as per the seizure memo appear completely different from those which have been described in the FIR. Regard being had to the above facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge,XI, Patna in Sessions Trial No.304 of 2008(Fatuha P.S.Case No.155 of 2007). B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )