IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA WRIT PETITION NO : 11223 of 1994 Between: Ch.Uma Sankar Patnaik, S/o.Audinarayana, aged about 27 years, Residing at Sringavarapukota, Vizianagaram District. ..... PETITIONER AND The Divisional Manager, Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Vizianagaram Division, Vizianagaram District. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction directing the respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment as a Conductor in Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation on the basis of he being a displayed employee due to nationalization. For the Petitioner: MR.M.RAVINDRANATH REDDY, ADVOCATE. For the Respondent: MR.Y.VINAYAKA SWAMY, STANDING COUNSEL. The Court Made the Following: ORAL ORDER: Heard both sides. 2. The petitioner seeks employment in the respondent- corporation as displaced employee. 3. Admittedly, there was a scheme at the relevant point of time to accommodate some persons whose services were terminated on account of nationalization of the routes. 4. It sis represented by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-corporation that the said scheme is no longer in existence. 5. Having regard to the said fact, nothing remains for adjudication in this writ petition and hence the same is liable to be dismissed. 6. In the result, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 25TH JUNE 2004 D.S.R.VARMA, J KRK To: 1.The Divisional Manager, Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Vizianagaram Division, Vizianagaram District. 2. Two C.D. copies. 3.One spare.