IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 1ST APRIL 2008 / 12TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 10230 of 2006(P) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ P.P. SUNIL KUMAR, PEON, KANNUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., EVENING BRANCH, TELLICHERRY, RESIDING AT JAYARAJ BHAVAN, VADAKKUMBAD, TELLICHERRY, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.SOHAN SMT.SREEJA SOHAN.K. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE KANNUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER KANNUR. 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, THE KANNUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK, EVENING BRANCH, TELLICHERRY. BY ADV. SRI.K.M.MUHAMMED KUNHI ADV. SRI.P.NARAYANAN,SC,KANNUR DIST.CO.OP.BA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/04/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO: 10230/2006 P APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1. COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE GIVEN BY MADURAI SIDDHA VAIDHYA SANGAM TO THE PETITIONER DT. 23/5/2005. EXT.P2. COPY OF THE LETTER SENT BY THE R2 TO THE R1 GIVING A COPY TO THE PETITIONER DT. 1/2/2006. EXT.P3. COPY OF THE LETTER SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE R1 DT. 2/2/2006. EXT.P4. COPY OF THE LETTER OF THE R1 DT. 15/2/2006 ALONG WITH THE ENQUIRY REPORT. EXT.P5. COPY OF THE REPLY SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE R1, DT. 2/3/06. EXT.P6. COPY OF THE SENIORITY LIST OF CATEGORY II PEONS/LIFT OPERATOR/WATCHMAN DT. 26/2/2005. EXT.P7. COPY OF THE MEMO ALLOWING THE PETITIONER TO JOIN DUTY AT EVENING BRANCH OF THE R1 DT. 24/4/2006. EXT.P8. COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE R1 DT. 15/12/2006. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL. True copy tga THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.C.No.10230 of 2006 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of April, 2008 JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 states that, pending this writ petition, a representation has been received by the respondent from the petitioner, regarding the claims raised by him for seniority and that the said representation would be considered and disposed after hearing all parties. Hence, this writ petition is disposed of, without entering into merits, directing that such representation shall be considered and disposed of only after hearing all parties who would be affected if any benefit is given to the petitioner. The petitioner shall also be given an opportunity of being heard. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE csl