SM 1 19.ao.895.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 895 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1180 OF 2011 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 895 OF 2011 Smt. Sushila Mathuradas Thakkar and ors. ....Appellants. Versus Mr. Premchand Ramkhitavanadav and anr. ....Respondents. ____________ Vandana Thakkal Appellant No. 3- present in person. Mr. A. K. Upadyay i/b Mr. S. K. Dubey for the Respondent No. 1. Ms. K. K. Soraan for the Respondent -BMC CORAM: R. M. BORDE, J. DATED : NOVEMBER 22, 2011. P.C.: Since the challenge raised in the Appeal from Order is in respect of grant of ad-interim injunction, the Appeal from Order can be conveniently disposed of by issuing direction to the Trial Court to decide the pending Notice of Motion expeditiously. 2. It is found that ad-interim injunction is granted till the next date by virtue of order passed on 26th November, 2008 and is no continued. The Notice of Motion is stated to be pending. The Trial Court is directed to decide the Notice of Motion Exhibit-5 in L.C. Suit No. 2752 of 2008, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 16 weeks from the date of the receipt of the writ SM 2 19.ao.895.11 of this order. 3. Appeal from Order stands disposed of. In view of disposal of the Appeal from Order, pending Civil Application does not survive and the same stands disposed of. 4. The respondent Corporation shall be at liberty to file their written statement/ reply before the trial Court along with documents, if any. (R. M. BORDE, J.)