HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIV1SION BENCH Hon'ble Shri Rajeev Gupta, C.J. & Hon'bie Shri L.C. Bhadoo, J. W.P.(PIL) No.5938/2 Petitjoners 1. Shailesh Shrivastava, S/o S.V. Shrivastava, aged about 40 years, R/o Punjabi Coiony, Katora Talab, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Kanhaiya Lal Agrawal, S/o R.S. Agrawal, aged about 37 years, President, Bank Kshetriya Katedar Katyan Samiti, Raipur ('CG) 3. Suresh Jain, S/o Late Rekhchand Jain, aged about 34 years, R/o 183 Nahata Building, Satti Bazar, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Kaushlendra Agrawal, S/o Prafulla Narayan Agrawal, aged about 55 years, Resident C/o Priyanka Paper Mart, 12 Prakash Bhawan, Kankalipara, Raipur (C.G.) Versus 1 State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Home Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2 Secretary, Co-operative Department of Chhattlsgarh State, Raipur (C.G.) 3 Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Chhattisgarh, Raipur. 4. 5. ^- Joint Registrar Cooperative Societies, Raipur (C.G.) indira Priyadarshini Mahila Nagrik Sahkari Bank Maryadit, through Administrator Chief Executive Officer, Raipur (C.G.) Reserve Bank of india, Chief Manager, Urban Banks Departments, First Floor, Garments House Warli, Mumbai 7. Coilector, Raipur, District Rajpur 8. Superirrtendent of Police, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 9. Officer In-charge, Police Station Kotwaii, Raipui"(C;G;)- WRiT P£:! UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THi CONSTITUTOIN OF INDIA Present: Smt. Meena Shastri, Counsel for the petitioners. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, learned Dy. Govt. Advocate for respondents No. 1, 2, 3,4,7,8 & 9. '^'- 't:' ^ '^ ;-^. ' 'l 1 th They are heard on admission. t 2. The petitioners have filed this writ petition styled as Public / Interest Litigation forthe foilowing reliefs:- (7.1) That the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to cali for the entire records with case diary of crime No.07/2007 of the police Station Kotwali; Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) for its kind perusal. (7.2) That, t'ne Hon'bie Court further be pleased to direct the respondents to stop the liquidation proceedings pertaining to thestated bank. (7.3) That, the Hon'bie Court be pleasea' to direct the respondent No. 5 to continue the transaction, immediately. (7.4) That, the Hon'ble court be pleased to direct the respondent No.5 to stop any kind of payment/expenses (either) in the management or others to other than the depositers from the deposited amount. -)^^. x.sf5'"^ .^"'<<»aift, '^ s ^^?^ ^ Y^-^y ,f^ 1 ^ (7.5) That, the Hon'ble Court kindly be pleased to direct the respondent No.1 to hand over the instant case to any independent agency like C.B.I. or others to insure fair and proper investigation within a fixed short period. (7.6) That, the Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the respondents to refund their deposited amount with interest. (7.7) Any other rellef or relief(3) which this Hon'bte Court may think proper in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, may also kindly be granted. 3. The petitioners in substance were seeking directions for proper investigation ofthe case registered at crime No.7/2007 of Police Station Kotwali, Raipur. 4. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, learned Dy. Govt. Advocate for respondents 1,2,3,4,7,8 & 9 submits that the case registered at Crime No.7/2007 is being investigated by the Police and the cases have been reaistered against the erring officials. He further submits that in other case registered at Crime No.167/2006 after completion of investigation charge-sheet has already been submitted before the concerning Court against the persons found guilty in the investigatlon. 5. In this view of the matter we are of the opinion,that no further monitoring ofthe case is required in thiswrit petition. 6. The writ petition, therefore, stands disposed of. 7. The security amount deposited by the petitioners be refunded to them. " Sd/- Sd/- Cbief Justice L.C.Bhadoo Judge Jyo