IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.218 of 2010 KAJAL KUMARI @ KAJAL DEVI, W/o Pintu Sah @ Prakash Kumar Gupta, resident of village- Suhath, P.S. Sour Bajar, District- Saharsa. ...... Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 4. The Home Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5. The Inspector General of Police, Darbhanga. 6. The Deputy Inspector of Police, Saharsa. 7. The Superintendent of Police, Saharsa. 8. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna. 9. The Superintendent of Remand Home (Northern) Gaighat, Patna. 10. The Officer-in-Charge, Sour Bajar Police Station, District- Saharsa. 11. Praduman Singh, son of Sri Ramballabh Prasad Singh, resident of village- Rauta Khem, P.S. Sour Bazar, Distt. Saharsa. .... Respondents. ----------- 03- 29.4.2010 Heard Mr. Anant Kumar for the petitioner, learned Assistant Counsel to Government Pleader No.22 for respondent nos.1 to 10, and Mr. Naresh Chandra Verma for respondent no.11. Learned counsel for the parties submit in one voice that the petitioner is no longer in the remand home. Learned counsel for the respondents submit that there is no knowing as to under what circumstances she has been released, and whether or not she has been so released under orders of a Court. We would not like to go into the present proceeding about the validity of the release of the 2 petitioner from the remand home. It goes without saying that it will be open to the parties to raise this question, if so advised, before the Court who passed the order of remand. 2. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. It is made clear that in case any one of the parties raise the aforesaid question before the appropriate forum, the same shall be decided completely uninfluenced by the present order. (S K Katriar, J.) (Kishore K. Mandal, J.) S.K.Pathak/