IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25349 of 2008 SUDHIR KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 9.7.2008 Heard. Under the facts and circumstances of the case the contention is that it could not be a case either under Section 366 or 366A IPC inasmuch as the lady had not been duped to be enticed away or was never forced to go from one place to other with any particular intention. The lady herself stated that she had been promised a job in the LIC and that she was brought to the residential house of the accused persons, sheltered there and was taken around by the personal car of the accused. Regard being had to the facts and the contention, let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.3,000/-(three thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M. Patna City in Alamganj P.S.Case no.24 of 2008. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )