Crl. Revision No.526 of 2008 #1# IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Revision No.526 of 2008 Date of Decision:-24.12.2010 State of Punjab. ......Petitioner. Versus Manjinder Singh Kang. ......Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH. Present:- Mr. G.S. Cheema, Public Prosecutor, Punjab for the Petitioner. Mr. Vikramjit Chaudhary, Advocate for the Respondent. *** JASWANT SINGH, J(ORAL) Prayer through instant revision petition is made for setting aside the order dated 18.12.2007 whereby the learned trial Court dismissed the application of the prosecution under Section 311 Cr.PC for summoning the cited witnesses in the supplementary challan for their deposition on the ground that the prosecution was trying to change the whole nature of the case as the proposed evidence was not bonafide and was in complete contrast to the earlier evidence lead by the prosecution supporting the case against the accused. Learned Public Prosecutor prays for withdrawal of the present revision petition as petitioner accept the orders passed by the learned trial Crl. Revision No.526 of 2008 #2# court and further states that they are no longer aggrieved against the impugned order. Learned counsel for the respondent has opposed the prayer of withdrawal by stating that the same is based on political consideration. In view of the fact that present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner-State and is no longer interested to pursue the present criminal revision, in my opinion, the prayer of the learned Public Prosecutor is liable to be accepted. In my view no objection on behalf of the respondent-accused can be entertained, however, needless to say the remedy, if any, available to the respondent against the impugned order dated 18.12.2007 in accordance with law would always open for him to seek, if so advised. Dismissed as withdrawn. ( JASWANT SINGH ) JUDGE 24th December, 2010 Vinay