IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.518 OF 2005 OF MOTION NO.518 OF 2005 OF MOTION NO.518 OF 2005 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL (L) NO. 864 OF 2004 (L) NO. 864 OF 2004 (L) NO. 864 OF 2004 IN IN IN SUMMONS SUMMONS SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO 312 OF 2003 FOR JUDGMENT NO 312 OF 2003 FOR JUDGMENT NO 312 OF 2003 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3019 OF 2002 SUIT NO. 3019 OF 2002 SUIT NO. 3019 OF 2002 V.B.Patel Auto (Gujrat) Ltd. & Ors. .. Applicants V/s Tata Engineering & Locomotive Co. Ltd. & Anr. .. Respondents ----- Shri.N.Thakkar i/b. Mulla & Mulla Co. for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.VAZIFDAR, S.J.VAZIFDAR, S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 10TH MARCH, 2006. : 10TH MARCH, 2006. : 10TH MARCH, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. None appears for the Applicant. The learned Counsel for the Respondents points out that in the above summary suit, decree has already been passed on 27th June, 2005. In view thereof nothing survives in the present Notice of Motion. Hence, Notice of Motion for condonation of delay stands dismissed. In view of the disposal of the Notice of Motion and the decree being passed, above appeal also stands dismissed. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)