CRR No.1251 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR No.1251 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 12.01.2011 Kuldip Kaur ....Petitioner Versus Sawinder Singh ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. A.S. Manaise, Advocate, for the respondent. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel appearing for the parties have fairly stated that learned counsel for the appellant was not heard by the Appellate Court while dismissing the appeal. From the perusal of the record, it transpires that on the date fixed, learned counsel for the appellant has sought an adjournment and has also sought exemption from the personal appearance of the appellant, since appellant was suffering from typhoid. However, learned Appellate Court has declined the exemption as well as adjournment and decided the appeal at its own merit. In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, present revision is allowed. Impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded to the Appellate Court. Appellate Court shall decide the appeal after hearing both the parties at its own merit in accordance with CRR No.1251 of 2010 (O&M) -2- law within three months. Parties are directed to appear before the Appellate Court on 20.1.2011. (Alok Singh) Judge January 12, 2011 R.S.