IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 4105 of 2008 Decided on: 05.10.2010 Akhtar Ali …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioners. : Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr.R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : CMP(T) No. 446 of 2010 Heard. In view of the grounds taken in the application, duly supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed. The legal representatives/legal heirs of the petitioner are ordered to be brought on record. The Registry is directed to carry out the necessary correction in the memo of parties. CWP(T) No. 4105 of 2008 Petitioner has only pressed the relief for grant of the subsistence allowance of the period during which he remained under suspension. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-State to consider the case of the petitioner and release due and admissible subsistence allowance to him for the period during which he remained under suspension, within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that rest of the reliefs were not pressed for. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge October 5, 2010 (K. Attri)