IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.944 of 2008 MD. MAHFOOL & ANR Versus MD. SERAJ & ORS ----------- 5 17.09.2008 For the reasons mentioned in the application (I.A. No. 3651 of 2008), the delay in filing of this application is condoned. On the merits of this case, this Court would not find any error in the impugned order inasmuch as it has been categorically recorded therein that the land claimed by the plaintiffs-petitioners i.e. Plot No. 2684 had been recorded in the name of the intervener in a proceedings under Section 106 of Bihar Tenancy Act. That being so there is no jurisdictional error in the impugned order impleading the intervener as a party in the suit in terms of Order I Rule 10 (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure . This Court accordingly would find no merit in this Civil Revision application and thus, the same is hereby dismissed. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)