THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No. 10174 OF 2011 O R D E R: This Writ Petition can be disposed of right at this stage. The petitioner has preferred a revision with the 1st respondent Joint Collector on 05.05.2006 against the orders passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukur on 30.09.2004. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukur through his proceedings, dated 30.09.2004 has cancelled the proceedings, dated 07.11.2001 issued by the Mandal Revenue Officer, who in turn, cancelled the assignment of land made in favour of the 4th respondent. It is stated by the writ petitioner that an orange orchard of ten-year-old is existing on the land as of now and because of the pendency of the revision, the petitioner is facing an imminent threat of dispossession at the hands of the 4th respondent. If the 1st respondent Joint Collector has received the revision said to have been preferred by the writ petitioner herein on 05.05.2006 against the orders passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukur on 30.09.2004 and if the said revision has not been disposed of so far, he may do so by passing appropriate orders, duly providing an opportunity of hearing to all concerned, within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In the meantime, Respondents 1, 2 and 3 will ensure that the possession of land existing as of now be maintained. With this, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. ---------------------------------- (NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J) 15th April 2011 ksld