IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 22ND MAGHA 1930 Bail Appl..No. 7834 of 2008() -------------------------------------------- (CRIME NO.530/07 OF PERAMANGALAM POLICE STATION) PETITIONER(S): 1ST ACCUSED: ------------------------------------------------- N.SREEDHAR, S/O. NANU, MAMINANGALAM, HOUSE, VELAPPAYA P.O., THRISSUR VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK. BY ADVS. MR.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN MR.K.S.RAJESH MR.M.O.POULSON RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: ----------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSEUCUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTING THE S.I. OF POLICE, PERAMANGALAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR. C.M.KAMMAPPU THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss K.HEMA, J. ----------------------------------------- B.A.No. 7834 of 2008 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th February, 2009 O R D E R This petition is for anticipatory bail. 2. The alleged offences are under Sections 420, 294(b) and 506(1) read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. According to prosecution, petitioner (first accused) entered into an agreement with de facto complainant for sale of 5 cents of property with a house and an advance for Rs.50,000/- was received, but the property was not conveyed to de facto complainant. De facto complainant was abused and threatened when he insisted for execution of sale deed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the charge sheet is laid on 15.11.2008 and hence, the police is not intending to arrest petitioner for the purpose of investigation. Therefore, no ground exists to grant anticipatory bail. Petitioner may seek remedy before the trial court in accordance with law. Petition is dismissed. K.HEMA, JUDGE vgs.