1 caw2594-739 hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2594 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 739 OF 2004 Smt. Kusum Sudhakar Inamdar ... Petitioner Versus Shri. Gajanan Moreshwar Omkar ... Respondent Mr. Drupad Patil holding for Mr. G.S. Godbole, advocate for petitioner. CORAM : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J. DATED : OCTOBER 20, 2010 P.C. This Civil Application is taken out for bringing the heirs of the deceased respondent i.e. respondents nos. 1A to 1E on record. Advocate Mr. Lagu had accepted service of application on behalf of these respondents on 1.9.2010. Respondent no. 1 died on 29.1.2006. The applicant states in the application that the advocate for the respondent had sent letter dated 4.9.2006 to his Advocate intimating him about death of the respondent. The letter was received by the peon of the advocate who kept it in the file without showing to the advocate. After 2 caw2594-739 admission of the writ petition, the advocate had no occasion to look into the file and as such he was not aware of the letter. It is only when the writ petition came to be listed for final hearing that the advocate opened the papers and found the letter. Thereafter the present application has been filed for bringing the heirs on record. Considering the position that the provisions of Order 22 of C.P.C. are not applicable to the writ proceedings and considering the facts set out in the application, the Civil Application allowed in terms of Prayer clause (a). Amendments to be carried out within a period of one week form today and the amended copy be served upon the newly added respondents within a period of one week thereafter. Stand over by two weeks. (SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J.)