IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25408 of 2010 RADHEY CHAUHAN SON OF CHHATHU CHAUHAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 28.7.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 201, 364 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Considering that this case is of the year 1999 and it is only on 2.4.2010 that the petitioner has been remanded in this case and the explanation for his absconds is only between 2007 to 2010, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is made clear that the petitioner’s case shall not be bifurcated for purposes of commitment and charge. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )