XI-HC—78 ^^ ^{W<^^, ^W\<S, fs|01^14,< ^TO^TT *^14> •^ 200 3?T^?T ^^ (^^[^S) ^H^T ^T R^J^ ^^TT •STT^T^^NT 1»^- ^TTW^rf^T ^TT^T <=r)i<<t(<n<Ti-i 'qTR^f "^..f^st <F3i^i< ^'^TRR'SH^T HIGH COURT OF CHHAfrTISGARH AT BILASPUR M. A. N0. ^77 of 2006 APPBLLANTS Owner Driver Vs RESPONDENTS Claixnatits Arun Kumar Devnath, S/o H.D. Devnath, aged 32 years, Occupation- Service, R/o Bhaisdafai, Haldibadi, Chirmiri, Tahsil Maaendragarh, Distt. Korca(C.G.) Bianu Barik, S/o Satyasi Barik, aged about 36 years, Occupation Service, R/o Sonaniaai (Udiyadafai), P.S. Chirmiri, Tahsil Maaendragarh, Distt. Korea(C.G.) 1. Smt. Phoolmati, W/o Dayaaaad, D/o Late Rataasai, aged 20 years. 2. Ku. Sita, D/o Late Rataasai, aged 16 years, 3. Ku. Geeta, D/o Late Rataasai, aged 16 years. 4. Ku. Saiigeeta, D/o Late Rataasai, aged 11 years. 5, Ku, Ardta, D/o Late Rataiisai, aged 9 years. 6. Ku, Raai, D/o Late Rataasai, aged 7 ^^ai^^^—^—.^^,^^^_— 7. Vijay Kuinar, S/o Late Rataasai, aged 7^ years. — ^^^ XI-HC—78 ^^ ^T ^rll<=ft TT^T 3TR?T $hHIC^ ; 3^" -qi^l^'q, ?$Tf|'y^(S, isl^l'yy ^THcTT sbNI<*> "R^ 200 (^y w^l '^^ (^1^<^) ^^fTWHft^^^r Mr. D.N. Prajapati, Counsel for ^tie appeUaats. JUD agai}ist This appeal is directed passed by the Additional Motor Acc Claim Case No.3/2005 whereby a to the claimants and the liability herein i.e. owner 8s driver of the vel same was not insured at the time o question was insured by responder of adjudication of the application u appeal being devoid of substance i dismissed. obl<4f<v1<fl'l 1RTR^f ^.fe^t ^f^R ^3ff?FT3TT^r No. 2 to Through Guardiaa Phoolinati, Dayaaaad, Ku. D/o Late Rataiisai. AU R/o Charcha Basti, P.S. & TahsU Baikuntiipur, Distt. Koria (C.G.) 8. Braach Maaager, The Oriental Insuraace Co. Ltd. Ambikapur (C.G.) are inuiors, Natural Sister W/o Geeta, MBNT the interim award dated 28.4.2006 ^ident Claims Tribunal, Baikunthpur in |sum of Rs.50,000/- has been awarded has been fastened on the appellants licle in question on the ground that the accident. Since no evidence was proc^uced by the owner that the vehicle in ^.t No.5-Insurance Company at the time Inder Section 140 ofthe Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the impugned award h^s been passed. As such, there is no illegality or infirmity in the impugfied award passed by the tribunal, the liable to be dismissed and it is hereb^ Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge 30.4.2007