IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 29TH MAY 2007 / 8TH JYAISHTA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 595 of 2007(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.1336/2007 Dated 23/01/2007 .................... : PETITIONER --------------------------- K.K.SADANANDAN, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O KORU, KARIPPALI HOUSE, DESAMANGALAM P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JOBI JOSE KONDODY RESPONDENTS: ------------- DR.M.BEENA, D/O AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SHRI. M.K.PUSHPALATHA, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/05/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ----------------------------------- COC No. 595 of 2007 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 29th day of May, 2007 J U D G M E N T Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. 2. Even though petitioner has alleged non-compliance of judgment while issuing order by the Collector and inspection report by the RDO, I do not think it is a fit case to initiate contempt against the respondents. Contempt petition is accordingly closed leaving freedom to the petitioner to challenge the order passed pursuant to the judgment in the writ petition and ask for appropriate relief. Issue photocopy today itself. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) jg