BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the First day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.14227 of 2011 1. KANNAN 2. UTHAYA SURIYAN 3. SARAVANAN 4. CHELLAPANDI 5. VETRIVEL 6. MARIKANNAN 7. RATHINAM 8. ANNAKILI 9. MUNIYANDI 10. UDAYAL 11. KUMARAVEL 12. GANTHI 13. SASI 14. ARUMUGAM 15. GANESH PANDI 16. SHANTHI 17. PARAMESHWARI 18. SIVAKAMI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED No.1 to 4, 6 t0 16 Vs INSPECTOR OF POLICE OTHAKADAI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DIST IN CR.NO. 488 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. V.SATHISH Advocate For Respondent : K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for offences under Sections 147, 148, 342, 324, 323, 427 and 307 IPC and Section 3(1) TNPPDL Act in Crime No.488 of 2011 the petitioners have come up with this petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of prosecution, due to previous enmity, there was a clash between two parties, in which, both parties are injured. The de-facto complainant filed the present case against the petitioners for offences as stated above and in respect of the injuries sustained by the accused party, there is a counter case in Crime No.487 of 2011 under Sections 147, 148, 324, 307 IOPC and Section 3(1)(X) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities ) Act, 1989. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3. It is brought to the notice of this Court that in both cases, the injured have been discharged from the hospital and there is absolutely peace prevailing. 4. Having regard to the fact that the accused parties also sustained injuries and having regard to the submission of the learned counsel the prosecution parties are the aggressors, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to these petitioners but with stringent conditions. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners 1 to 4, 7,9,11,13 and 14 shall reside at Sivagangai and report before the Sivagangai Town Police Station, Sivagangai every day at 10.30 am., until further orders and as far as the petitioners 5,6,8,10,12 15 to 18 they shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for the purpose of interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C Scrupulsouly. sd/- 01/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MELUR 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI 3. INSPECTOR OF POLICE OTHAKADAI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DIST 4. THE OFFICER IN CHARGE, TOWN POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI 5. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. V.SATHISH Advocate SR.No.37463 GH : 03.11.2011 : 2P/7C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14227 of 2011 Date :01/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/