: 1 : FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.583 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.677 OF 2008 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.729 & 730 OF 2008 IN L.C.SUIT NO. OF 2008 -------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders of Coram, appearances, Court’s . orders or directions and . Registrar’s orders . -------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.V. Mishra i/b M/s.V.Mishra & Co. for the Appellant. . Mr.B.H. Mehta, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 3. . Mr.A.R. Mishra for Respondent No.5. . CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 24TH JUNE, 2008. P.C. : 1. The impugned orders warrant no interference. Firstly, the Plaintiff/Applicant is an unregistered society. There is nothing to suggest who are the members of that society. There is a dispute in this regard as well. Further no steps under Order 1 Rule 10 of the : 2 : C.P.C. are taken. 2. It is also contended on behalf of the learned AGP appearing on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 and 3 that if any alleged members of the Appellant are aggrieved as a result of not being allotted the tenements despite there being entitled to the same, their remedy is before the High Power Committee appointed under the Slum Rehabilitation Act. 3. It appears that the Chairman of the Appellant has himself been allotted a tenement. Needless to state that any person aggrieved by not having been allotted the tenement, is at liberty to approach the High Power Committee who shall consider the case in accordance with law. Mr.Mehta, the learned AGP appearing on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 and 3 does not deny that Respondent Nos.1 and 3 would be bound to make the allotment according to such decision. 4. In the circumstances, the Appeal : 3 : from Order is accordingly disposed of. The Civil Application is also disposed of.