1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.822 OF 2006 The State of Maharashtra ..... APPELLANT V E R S U S Bhaguji @ Babu Nana Narsale & Others .... RESPONDENTS Shri. Deelip Bankar Patil, A.P.P. for the State. [ CORAM : R.M.BORDE, J. ] DATE : 10/06/2009 ------------------------------------------------- ORAL JUDGMENT : 1. This is an Appeal against the order of acquittal recorded by the Judicial Magistrate ( First Class ), Parner on 27/9/2006, whereby the trial Judge convicted accused no. 1, whereas directed acquittal of other accused involved in the crime. The offence alleged is under Section 323, 324, 504 r/w 34 of Indian Penal Code. The trial Judge found that there is sufficient material as against accused no. 1 in respect of his complicity in 2 the alleged crime, whereas the trial Judge found that there is no independent corroboration to the version put by the prosecution in respect of involvement of other accused. 2. I have perused the Judgment recorded by the trial Judge. The learned trial Judge has adopted reasonable approach and on appreciation of evidence placed on record, has drawn correct conclusions. The view adopted by the trial Judge is a possible view and merely because some other view is also possible considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in itself can not be a ground for causing interference in the order of acquittal. There is no merit in the Appeal. The Appeal, therefore, stands dismissed. [ R.M.BORDE ] JUDGE knp/CRIAPL822.06