(M) y COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (€-} No. 1 116 of2009 pETm' RESPONDENTS SSiyam Narayan Shrivas, aged about 67 years s/o Babai Ram Shrivas, R/o Ward No. 6, Gourela, Talisil Pendraroad, District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Clihattisgarh, Throueli Sscretarv, Departmeiit of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan. Raipiir (C.G.) 2. Additional Coilector, Pendra Road, Distriet T^^'ioc—fii^fr- r'. \ ijiisspur {^.kj. ] 3. The Sub Divisional OfEcer, Peiidra Road, Distriet Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. The Tahsildar, Peiidra Road. Distfict Biiaspur ri' .:\J. ^"^ 7T^ T'^~t T^T~'^?~ITF~I~fT/~\"\ T T 7 WRIT PETITION U 5. The Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchavat Gourela, Tahsil Pendra Road, Disti-ict Bilaspur (C.G.) 6. Raj Kumar Stovas, son of Ram Manohar Slmvas. 7. Ramesh Kumar Shi-ivas. son ofRam Manohai- Slirivas. 8. Smt. Mantora Bai. widow of Late Ram Manohar Shrivas. No. 6 to 8 All R/o Ward No. 6. Gourela, Tahsil' Pendra Road, District Bilaspur (C.G.) TTT^ /^^ J^i^ T f^ F-T~*T'~T~rT T'T^T-'^"^^.'^ /"^!: T^ T^ "T^^T ARTICLE 226 OF THE CC'NSTmjTION OF INDIA Satish K. Asraliotri. Present: Shri Prakash Mishra, Advocate fbr the petitioner. Sm-i Shashank Tliakur, Paiiel La'-yer forthe State/respondeiit No. 1 to 4. (Passed on 26 day of Febniary, 2009) Leanied counsel appearing fbr the pstitioEer, ia this peti his prayer to the efiect fhat the Additional Coliector, a. commes District Biiaspiu-- i.e. the respondent No. 2, bv order dated 4.10.2007 (Aimexiire P/l) has eancelled the order pureuaat to the resolution dated 6.11.2006 wherebv allotment was made to Mantora Bai, Raikumar and Ramesh Kumar Shrivas. The authorities belcw i.e. the Naear Pancaayat, Gourela has failed to co.mply with tlie order passed by tlie respondent €£> No. 2. Despite several rqiresentations made to the respondeHt No. 2, no actioa has been taken. Sliri Tliakur, !eamed Panel Lawyei appeai-mg for the State.'respondents 1 to 4 submits that it is the responsibility ofthe Coilector to ensure that his order is complied with. This Court caimot be treated as an executme Court. Therefore- direction may be issued to the Additional Collector, Pendra Road. to ensure comDliacce ofhis ov«norder within a specified 3. Accordiaalv, the Additional Collector, Pendra Road is direeted to ensure coi-npliance ofhis own order dated 4.10.2007 (Amiex~are P'l) if the same has no't been modified or over-n'iled bv siibsequent order. 4. In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of No order asto costs. Sd/- i Satish K. Agnihotri Judge