9/3 M743 F ‘5 $awg£ @E§m rig ) .. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHI-IATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION ( s ) No. 7%2 0f 2010 / Manoj Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Devkumar Sharma , aged about 35 years, occupation service, computer operator, Nagar Panchayat Adhbhar, R/o Ward No. 12 Adhbhar, District Janjg‘r Champa (CG). }/‘// AND / 1. The State of Chhath'sgarh, through the principle Secretary, Depa: unent of Urban Administration and ti‘ Development, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipu (CG). / 2. The Under Secretary, Department of Urban Administration and Development, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). The Director, Directorate of Urban Administration and Development Department, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG), . The Nagar Panchayat Adhbhar, through its Chief Municipal omcer, Adhbhar, Champa(CG). District Janjg'r RESPONDENTS ‘ WRIT PETITION UIA 226 OF THE CONSITITUTION OF INDIA % r . HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASF’UR WRIT PETWION (S) N0.7359 OF 201G .(Wtit Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Singie Bench : Hon‘ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotti, J. Present :- Shri Awadh Tripafhi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri sushi! Dubey, Government Advocate for the $tate. Shri Rahu! Tamaskar, Advocate for the respondent No.4. P‘.‘ ORDER (oRAL) (Passed on this 25‘“ day of February, 201 1) we, 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the partiee joinuy and fairly submit that the issue involved in the present petition as well as in Dhanirem & Others v. state of Chhettisgerh & Others’, whloh was considered and decided by this Court on 20.01.2011, are identical. Thereafter, the said issue was re—considered in Virendra Des Menikpun‘ & Others v. The State of Chhattisgarh &. Othersz, by this Couvt on 10.02201 1. Thus, the instant petition is squarely covered by the orders passed by this couit in Dheniram & athers’ and Virendra Des Menikpun‘ e omeré. 2. in View of the submission made by leamed counse appearing for the l parties, this petition is disposed of in terms of the orders passed in Dhanirem & Others’ and Virendra Des Manikpuri & Othersz. Sd/— t: Satish K. Agnihott‘i s Judge ashok t i / f. t W.P.(S) No e795 or 2010, decided on 20.1 2011 2 W.P.(S) Noi’7450 or 2010 , decided on 10,é.2o11 q PETITIONER Manoj Kumar Sharma Versus RESPONDENTS , The State of Ghhattisgarh & Others