IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO : 1214 of 2010 Between: 1 Bandaru Srinivasa Rao, S/o Chinnaiah, Navabhart Colony, 1st Lane, 2nd Cross Road, Guntur, Guntur District. 2 Bhavaram Sambi Reddy, S/o Raghava Reddy, Sthambalagarvu, Guntur, Guntur District. 3 Paladugu Venkata Rao, S/o Bhushaiah, Narakoduru Village, Chebrolu Mandal, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., at Hyderabad. 2 Yakala Seshagiri Rao, S/o Anantha Satyanarayana, Vysya Trust Board, Chairman Podile Mandal, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Section ____ of Crl.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased toto call for the records in CC.No. 134 of 2007 on the file of the J.F.C.M., Podili, Guntur District, and quash the same. The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.VENKAT YADAV, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent. The Court made the following: ORDER PSR, J. Crl.P.No. 1214 of 2010 O r d e r: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 2. The offences alleged against the petitioners is one under section 379 read 511 IPC. As per the complaint, some persons tried to remove a deity from the temple. The names of the persons are not found in the complaint. In the charge sheet it is not mentioned as to what is the material against the petitioners connecting them with the crime. Still, as the Calendar case is of the year 2007 and as the preset petition is filed after long delay of three years, the petition is dismissed. 3. However, the trial Court is directed to dispose of the Calendar case within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, as the witnesses cited are only eight in number and there is nothing substantial, as per the charge sheet. _______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. February 17, 2010. *BVS