Crl. Rev. No.M-1223 of 2010 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Rev. No. 1223 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 10, 2010 Gurpreet Singh @ Vicky …..Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and another …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr. R.V.S. Chugh, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) I have carefully gone through the impugned order dated February 24, 2010 summoning the petitioner as an additional accused while exercising powers under Section 319 Cr.P.C. Except for one wrong i.e. application has been allowed after the recording of the statements of all the prosecution witnesses, there does not appear to be any other illegality as the petitioner is specifically named in the original statement of complainant Deepa Singh. Whether the summoning and examination of Surinder, other PW is illegally cannot be determined while scrutinizing the impugned order Crl. Rev. No.M-1223 of 2010 (O&M) [2] under Section 319 Cr.P.C. The factum of petitioner having illicit relations with deceased lady has been got reiterated in the cross-examination of PW4 Deepa Singh by counsel for the co-accused. The circumstances prima facie indicate the involvement and probable chances of conviction. This petition is, therefore, dismissed. However, it is clarified that this order will not, in any manner, prejudice the rights of the petitioner. It will be open to the petitioner to raise all the pleas taken up in this petition and seek acquittal if the petitioner is able to show that he has been implicated on the basis of suspicion or that he does not have any hand in the abetment of suicide of the deceased. May 10, 2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE