IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21136 of 2010 RAJU KUMAR @ RAKESH RANJAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 25.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Alleging false implication, the defence under Sections 20, 22 of the NDPS Act is that the allegedly seized Narcotic has not even been sent for a forensic test and charge sheet submitted. Considering that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.D.J., VII, Patna in connection with Gardanibagh P.S. Case No. 25 of 2010. Before enlarging the petitioner on bail, the trial Court shall verify from the records if the seized item has been sent for forensic test or not. If it has been and a report is available to the effect that it is Narcotic, the application shall be deemed to have been rejected. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)