IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 31ST AUGUST 2010 / 9TH BHADRA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 5071 of 2010() ------------------------------------------ (CRIME NO.165/2009 OF THRITHALA POLICE STATION,PALAKKAD DISTRICT) ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2: ------------------------------------------- CHINJU @ MUNEER, AGED 21 YEARS, S/O.ABUBACKER, SIRAJ MANZIL, CHALAYIL PURAYIDAM, MULLAKKAL POST, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.NIREESH MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: --------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THRITHALA POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.S. HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Bail Application No. 5071 of 2010 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 31st day of August, 2010 ORDER Petitioner, who is the 2nd accused in Crime No.165/2009 of Thrithala Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 341, 326, 308 and 120B IPC, seeks his enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 26.6.2009. The petitioner was arrested on 30.7.2010. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the nature of the injury sustained and the other facts and circumstances of the case, if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) dmb