IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2871 of 2010 1. NAND LAL SAH @ NAND LAL PRASAD,son of Nagina Sah 2. Amit Kumar,son of Nand Lal Sah 3. Pappu Kumar,son of Khublal Sah 4. Munna Kumar @ Munna Prasad,son of Khublal Sah. All are residents of village-Lachhanauta, P.S.-Gaunaha,District-West Champaran Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 06-04-2010 Heard Mr. Anil Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. Rajendra Singh Shastry, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Sahodara P.S.Case No.67/2009 dated 16-10-2009, registered under Sections 224/225/353/379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. According to prosecution case petitioner no.1, Nand Lal Sah @ Nand Lal Prasad, was arrested in connection with another criminal case vide Annexure-2 and while he was in police custody and had gone to attend the call of nature in a field, he with the help of petitioners no.2 to 4 fled away from there. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. In the aforesaid background and in view of the fact that petitioner no.1 is accused in at least two criminal cases and petitioners no.2 to 4 are specifically named accused in the FIR, they are not entitled to have the privilege of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, their prayer for anticipatory bail is dismissed. They must surrender in the 2 court below within a period of four weeks from today and seek regular bail, if so advised. If such a prayer is made, the same may be considered and disposed of on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. AH/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)