KI6H COURT OF CHHATHS6ARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON'BLE MR. JUSTI<a PRITINKER DIWAKER CR.M.P.NO. 243/2009 PE'HTIONERS NQH-APPLICANT versus Farida Begum & Another Nasim Ahmed Kadri Shri Shashi Kumar Kushwaha, counsel for the petitioners. PBTITION UNDBR SECTION 482 OF TH& CR.P.C. ORDER (12.04.2010) The present petition is directed against the impugned order dated 12,11.2003 passed by the revisional Court, Sakti affinning the order dated 7.8.03, Eioth the impugned orders were eariier challenged by the petitioners before this Court in M.Cr.C. No. 3034/2003 vide Annexure A/3. The said petition was withdrawn tsy the petitioners on 24.08.06 with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy available under the law, 2. Counsel for the petitioners admits that after the order dated 24.8.06 passed by this Court the petitioners have not approached any court nor have availed any other remedy and have a^in fiied similar petition which was filed earlier. 3. I have heard counsel for the petitioners. Admittedly, on the same point the eariier petition was fiied by the petitioners before this Court in the year 2003 and the same was withdrawn on 24.8.2006. This Court is of the considered opinion that the petitioners cannot be permitted to file petition one after other withdrawing the earlier petition by making some statement and then without availing the other remaly ffling the simiiar petition. Furthermore, even the petitioners have not mentioned as to why they had withdrawn the eariier petition or any steps have been taken by them or not. The petition has no merits and is accordingly dismissed at the motion stage itseif. . - - -..-^-_—., Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge