mg§Qmi :y‘ign / 35 ‘ $5§§§ n IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH w.P. s No. hgl/ 12011 / PETITIONER : Smt. Sudha Kurre W/o Shri Nohar WvK/«A/a 1\w,\ . gecgndary Bhllal Slccupatlon 'ngh Dlstt. Kurre School Durg — Aged Lecturer, (CG): J. P about Na Govt. gar 43 cam Figahres; n p-2 " WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ¥ ‘ w g W \ VERSUS ( RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through — The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Joint Director, Accounts, and Treasury Pension, Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer District Durg (CG) HIGH COURT CF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR $INGLE BENCH : HON’BLE SHR! PRASHANT KUMAR NUSHRA J. W.P.(S) No.492 of 2011 PETlTiONER Smt. Sudha Kurre. Versus RESPONDENTs State of Chhattisgarh and others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. Appearancé’: Shri Vipin Tiwari, counsel for petitioner. Shri N. Naha Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (28l01l2011) Following oral order of the Court was passed by Prashant Kumar Mishra. J. Heard. (2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submlts that the petitioner ls entitled to benefit of two advance increments on account of she having passed B.Ed. examination before her appointment at her own cost. It is submitted that the issue involved in the present petition is no longer res infegra and the same has been finally decided by the Hon‘ble Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena vs. State of M.P. & Ors., reported in 2009 (III) MPJR (SC) 59. (3) It is further submitted that this Court has also taken a similar view in its order dated 06/02/2009 passed in WP. (S) No. 6257 of 2008‘ Learned counsel for the petitioner further draws attention of this Court to order dated 29/04/2010 passed in Writ Appeal No. 124 of 2009, wherein relying upon the judgment of the Supreme'Court in the case of Asha JSaxena (supra) and the order passed by this Court in another Writ i i Appeal No. 87/2009. directions have been issued for consideration of the icase for grant of two advance increments as per circular dated i 21/09/1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification of t the facts pieaded in the petition (4) Learned counsel for the respondents submits that case of the petitioner would also be considered on the same lines. (5) ln View of the statement made above, this petition is tinaliy disposed off with a direction to the respondent authorities to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner for grant of two advance increment as per circular dated 21/09/1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh. alter verification of the facts pleaded in the petition within a period of eight weeks from today‘ Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge