c- ^' RFNC i<? £u,a^! ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION N0. {SS^ OF 2006 PETITIONER Smt. Malti Bai , W/o Shri Ram Singh Thakur ... aged about 58 years , occupation- house wife ..••4<°^/S>Shri Lal Thakur Badhiya Tola , Ward No.7 ^'&(^^ ..•<.-„ ^ .'.. ^••^•'••' ...-•"Infront of Nagar Palika Water Tank, o>u\«'-"'T:?--"" -.•••"' Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon (CG). /••'c^y ^^* .^^" ^^ VERSUS RESPONDENTS : /1. <s ;r' vl>' u-y / 2. ••..o G^'$> r" 1/3. State of Chhattisgarh, Secretary Department of School Education, D.K.S. Building Raipur (C.G.) The Accountant General (A 85 E ) II, M.P., Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh. Accountant General (A8EE) Chhattisgarh , Raipur (CG). /^. Block Education Officer, Block-Dondi, District Durg (CG). ^ WRIT PETITION U/S 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 F=T'•^TTTRTT, 'afll'M'iG, 31!^?'^ h-v^ sn^ gitiwfffe^ fq^a' sn^i TOiiwaf^i ^nTif?pftsr •flpTCrf^ fs^S TfSre^re i? arfigtT ani^F 24. tnony,courj Miss Dipali Pandey, Pan^i Lawyer for the State/respondents No.1 and 4, Mr. Ashutosh Kachchv.'-ah 'Heard. The p^titioner is the wjfe initially appointed as Assistant ^, counse! for respondents No.2 and 3. bf late Shri Ram Singh Thakur who was eacher in the year 1963 and iater on, he, Department tiil attainjng the age The main grievance of amount of Rs.64,569/- against tlte account The above grievance of t| office ofthe Deputy Accountant of Accountant Gener-a), Gwaiior sei for the peiitioner. was promoted on the post of rjead Master. He served the Education if superannuation on 31 March 1995. the petitioner 'is that an amount of Rs.39,000/- only was paid to \aVp Shri Ram Singh Thakur against G.P.F. I. re petiSioner appears to be.correct as the peneral, Ralpur wrote ietters to ihe office for sendin'g the account on 18-11-2004 & 13-1-2005. Jt appears that n^thing has been heard so far from the Accountam Genera! Office, Gv^.iior regarding the t'emaining payment of the G.P.F. amount. The second grievance of| deputatiori, a ne'w account No.It that amount, not a singie penny 'the petitioner is that her husband was on /ID/NMP-18453 'was opened and against hias been paid so far, ^ !t is a matter of conceriJ! that the'concemed authorities accepts writing of the ietters, but thefei' are'not .attending grievances of the petitioner. .'ln the cireumstenc^s, the petitioner is directed to send a detaited representation to the 4.G. Office,. i.e. respondent No.S.within a period of 2 weeks and rsspon^ent No.3, in turn, will ensiire that G.P.F. dues of husband of the petitionerdtie.settled from the datef-i^ ^spipt of XI-HC-22 ^si ^wM«i,^ fe, ferray Iq^s' an^cqii K;-< sn^i grRW^IN Ban/e ^ 3i1^T e^iTWHftg -^ representation, within another period from the record against both th? 4 MD/NMP-32367. It is made clear that) account of lapse ofths respondent4 entitled for the interest on the outstarldin rate of interest i.e, 9% against the adnliss If the payment of the adrr petitioner, then the petitioner'wjll be at ; The cost .of this petition respondent No.3 v/iil pay. With the direcfion aforesaid, th^ Parties areentitled for certified 'WTRrahw^ ^ fs^t •tRii^K W Sll^OTSflI^I ()f 2 months, after getting it verified lccounts Nos.MD/NMP-18453 and |he payment has not been.made on j.therefore, the petitioner shaii be |ding amount as per the admissibie sutstanding amount till the date of lissible amount is not made to the |!iberiy to fiie fresh wiit petition. assessed as Rs.2,000/- which petttion.standsdisposed of. bopy of'thlsorder. Sdf- L.c. Bhadoo Judge ^ .^?\ iy [Tf^^f^ ^ •^-- ^