1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Misc. Civil Application No.948 of 2010 In Civil Revision Application No.10 of 2010 (D) (Anil s/o Janbaji Pund v. Fulchand s/o Laxman Bangade) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri A. Shelat, Advocate for Applicant. Shri N.P. Wasade, Advocate for Respondent. Coram : R.K. Deshpande, J. Dated : 6 th December, 2010 The only contention raised in this review application is that the applicant had relied upon para 8 of the judgment delivered by this Court in Natwarlal Gokuldas Shah since deceased by his LRs. v. Khanderao Balwant Lokhande since deceased by His LRs. and others, reported in 2003(5) Mh.L.J. 184, and that has not been considered by the learned Single Judge in his judgment, of which review is sought. After going through the judgment delivered by this Court, it is apparent that the said judgment, particularly para 8 thereof, has been considered by the learned Single Judge in para 7 itself and the relevant portion is reproduced below : “In the said case, as could be seen, there was no notice 2 issued by the landlord making demand in terms of section 12(2) of the Bombay Rent, Hotel and Lodging House Rent Control Act (1947). The explanation given by the learned Single Judge in paragraph 8, even if read, as sought to be benefited by the learned counsel for the respondent, will not be coming to his rescue.” In view of above, there is no ground for review. The Misc. Civil Application for review is dismissed. Judge pdl