IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 233 of 2009 (S/B) Mohan Singh Bisht S/o C.S. Bisht R/o Village Gauja Jali Bichli P.O. Industrial Estate Talli Haldwani, Haldwani Nainital, presently posted as Incharge District Supply Officer. ……Petitioner. Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand through its Secretary Food and Civil Supply Civil Secretariat, Dehradun. 2. Commissioner, Food and Civil Supply Dehradun. 3. Sri Giresh Chandra Pandey serving as Supply Inspector in the office of District Supply Officer, Nainital. 4. Sri Kuber Singh Negi, serving as Supply Inspector, in the office of District Supply Officer, Almora. 5. Sri M.S. Adhikari, serving as Supply Inspector, in the office of District Supply Officer, Udham Singh Nagar. 6. Sri Lalit Mohan Bhatt, serving as Supply Inspector, in the office of District Supply Officer, Nainital. 7. Sri Vinod Kumar Tewari, serving as Supply Inspector, in the office of District Supply Officer, Udham Singh Nagar. 8. Sri Lila Dhar Patni, serving as Supply Inspector, in the office of District Supply Officer, Udham Singh Nagar. .……….Respondents. Shri Rajendra Dohbal, Sr. Advocate, assisted by Shri Anil Kumar Joshi, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ashish Joshi, Brief Holder for respondents No. 1 and 2. 2 Coram:Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon’ble Alok Singh, J. Oral:-Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 16.09.2009, passed by Public Services Tribunal, Uttarakhand, at Dehradun, in claim petition No. 96 of 2009, whereby the tribunal has refused the interim relief, sought by the petitioner. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties, represented through their counsel, before us. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner has challenged the seniority list dated 05.05.2009, in which the respondents No. 3,4,5,6,7 and 8, are shown above the petitioner. Said seniority list appears to have been made by the State in view of the order dated 25.04.2008, passed by this Court in writ petition No. 806 of 2005 (S/S). 4. In the above circumstances, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order, passed by the tribunal, challenged before us. This writ petition is summarily disposed of with the observation that the promotions, if any, made by respondents No. 1 and 2 on the 3 basis of the impugned seniority list, shall be subject to the final decision, passed by the tribunal in the claim petition. (Interim relief application No. 9155 of 2009, also stands disposed of). (Alok Singh, J.) (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt:06.11.2009 Sweta 4 5 6 7 8 9