IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40152 of 2010 NANTUN PASWAN & ORS . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02/ 09-Nov-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that in this case under Section 307 and other Sections of the IPC altogether 11 persons have been named as accused out of which five persons have been allowed anticipatory bail by this Court vide order contained in Annexure-4. Considering the relevant materials it is found that the case of petitioner no.1, Nantun Paswan stands on a different footing as there is specific allegation against him of causing injury by means of Farsa on the head of informant’s brother, hence his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. This order shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner no.1 if he surrenders and seeks regular bail. Considering the order of this Court contained in Annexure-4, prayer for petitioners no.2 to 6 is 2 allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within six weeks, let all the five petitioners, namely, 1. SUKESHWAR MANJHI, 2. SHIVNARAYAN PASWAN, 3. CHANDESHWAR PASWAN, 4. BECHAN PASWAN AND 5. HARENDRA PASWAN be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in Sakra P.S. Case No. 107/2009, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. perwez ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)