AB 2632/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.R. SARMA Heard Mr. TJ Mahanta, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. BS Sinha, lear ned Public Prosecutor, Assam. Perused the case diary. This is an application filed by the petitioners, under Section 438 CrPC for granting pre-arrest bail in the event of their arres t in connection with Fatasil Ambari PS Case No. 283/11 u/s 120(B)/498(A) IPC. The petitioners are already on interim bail granted by this Court on 26. 8.2011. There is no adverse report against the petitioners. The allegation bro ught against the petitioners in the FIR is that the petitioner No.1/husband went to Bangalore on 23.3.2011 to bring money from his father and brother i.e. the P etitioner Nos. 2 and 3 and he did not return, thereafter. In the FIR, it is als o mentioned that the petitioner No.1 along with the family members, demanded mon ey from the informant/wife during his stay at Guwahati. In view of above, considering the entire aspects of the matter and the n ature of allegation, I find no material against the petitioners requiring their custodial interrogation. Consequently, the prayer for bail stands allowed. The interim order pas sed earlier on 26.8.2011 is made absolute subject to condition that the petition ers shall appear before the I/O of the case within 7 days from today and on such other date(s) as may be so required by the I/O for the purpose of interrogation and the petitioners shall not try to induce or intimidate the witnesses. The bail application is disposed of. Return the case diary.