IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 23241 of 2008 Between: Vajja Venkata Rama Rao S/o. Narasimha RAo R/o. Mondrajupalli Village, Nelakondapalli Mandal, Khammam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Tahsildar, Nelakondapalli Mandal, Khammam District. 2 Village Revenue Officer, Budalabanda Village, Nelakondapalli Mandal, Khammam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring in action on the part of the respondents on the petitioner said representations including dts. 11.07.2007, 19.09.2007, 31.12.2007, 23.01.2008, 23.02.2008, 07.04.2008 for recording the petitioner name in columns 12 and 13 of No.3 Adangal / pahanis for his lands admeasuring Ac.3.12 Gts., Ac.2.36 Gts., and Ac.1.06 Gts. respectively covered by Survey Numbers 323/A, 323/AA2 and 323/AA3 of Bodhulabanda Village as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, violative of provisions of Andhra Pradesh Right in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971 and rules framed there under and offends article 14 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to record the petitioner name in the said columns and all relevant registers. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.23241 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner is statedly owner of land admeasuring Ac.3.12 guntas, Ac.2.36 guntas and Ac.1.06 guntas in survey Nos.323/A, 323/AA2 and 323/AA3 respectively situated at Bodhulabanda village of Nelakondapalli Mandal in Khammam District. He purchased said lands under registered sale deeds and applied for regularization. By proceedings, dated 08.08.1994 and 09.06.2004 (three separate proceedings) sales were validated and certificates were issued. Subsequently, petitioner also obtained pattadar pass books and title deeds (PPBs/TDs). His name was entered in the Pahanis all the years. However, in Falsi 1417 the name of petitioner was not mentioned. Therefore, petitioner made representations (at least six) to respondents for recording name of petitioner in columns 12 and 13 in Pahani for the said Fasli. Therefore, he filed present writ petition. Learned Assistant Government Pleader after getting instructions submits that applications of petitioner are still pending requiring some clarifications. Therefore, writ petition is disposed of directing first respondent to consider the representation, if necessary, by calling information from petitioner, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Petitioner is also given liberty to approach Tahsildar with a copy of this order and necessary documents. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. _______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 27.11.2008 pln