(Regional Director & Anr. Vs. Raj.Rajya Path Parivan Nigam & Anr.) S.B. CIVIL MISC. A. NO.1218/2006. Date of order : 29.08.2006 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH TATIA Mr. RK Soni, for the appellant. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. The grievance of the appellant is that the court below has committed error of law in exempting the respondent from depositing the requisite amount. It is not in dispute that the Court had jurisdiction to exempt the respondents from depositing the amount under the provisions of the ESI, Act 1948. Looking to the facts of the case, I do not find any reason to interfere in the appellate jurisdiction in such order which has been passed after careful consideration of the facts of the case. In view of the above, I do not find any merit in the appeal and the appeal is dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. gandhi/