i’ THE IUOM co: c’ *rtTAKA IT EaNCIJORE Dated ts the I th Day of Ipnil 129R BE FC RE THE IN’L MR. JUSTIC H,’, NIRAY4N Vu ir a ‘emma W/o late Rarmoaa, Iced a’rout 55 years, Ccc: !busecld, H/a w364, H,M,T Colony, Ban’a o’e - 560 031, ,,.,Petitior r (y Smt, Manjula R. VmracolU, Advocate) And: I The Gereral Manaaer, The njted India Irsuxrrce Comoany limIted, !‘o,143 & 144, 0KW Chamhers, let Main Road, S hadripu a Ban do e—56 or 5) Mn, jZ.Pplanjyardl, Sb Kan’an, Nc.n, S Icr boar “a -l Ta II N u tate . .?esprnr rts 5is P 1’ F a S ti 1 I r pam-t Ia o r 3 ted 9,3, 0 passed in M No, 1/97 on the file of ha Dis flct and essIors Juize, ‘ancaicre Rural District, BaneCore, This conina on for adwissior haj day, Ic our zedo no ‘ Ilowing:— .0 rder fl ORDER PetitIoner is the mother of the deceased in witS e fa’ur the Lok idalat has settled the tetter and awarded sên.e amount of comoensa.tIon to the mother w ad wife of the deceased, disregardThg the age of the parties. Neither the officeq presidIng over the Lok Adalat, nor the counsel for the partIes have noticed this defect, Therefore, a legal ernor has occurred in the decree. Parties are direc ted to get it rectified at the soprooriste forum, However, petitioner wit Is the mother of the deceased has approached the trIal court for release of the entire amount in deposit, in her favour. The trial court has already released t24,733/- initially at her instance and ordered dosIt of In F,D. Later, from the oervations made, the mother is not entitled for the same amount a.s that of the wife of the dec sed, and therefore, this amount cannot be relessed till the matter is corrected at the aooro prlate forum, Fevlsion is therefore dismissed, Sd/c TTwflri J 1048/180498