<2,fc Alok Kuia.ar Choiirasia, S/o Late Shri SushU Chourasia, aged about 40 years, R/o Baikunthpur, Raigarh, Tehsil and District Raigarh (C.G.) Chliattisgarh State Electricity Board, Through Joint Seci'etary (Personal) Raipur (C.G.) Chief Engineer, (Bilaspur Region) Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Bilaspur (C.G.) Superintendent Eugineer, (Biiaspur Region) Chliattisgarh State Electricifr Boanl, BUaspur (C.G.j Shri Utkarsh Venna, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Saleeiu Kazi, Counsel for fhe petitioner. Heard. The petitioner, who is workitig on fhe post of Assistant Grade-III, has been transfeiTed fi'oiu Raigarh to Jagdalpiu'. Leamed counsel for fhe petitioner subinits that tlie seniority of fhe persons like petitioner is m.aiutamed region wise and fhis is an iater-region trausfer, therefore, it luay allect the seniority of the petitioner. Moreover, fhe appou'lting aufhority is tlie Executi.ve Engiaeer, whereas, tlie transfer order has been passed by ftie Board. On being pointedly asked froni leamed coiLnsel for the petitioner as to how fhe seniority of fhe petitioner would be affected, he coiUd not show m.e aay docuiuent(s) iii tliis i^gard ^ W.P.('S)No.5626of2007 aad subuuts that fhe petitioner had tiied to coUect fhe copies of gradation list, but it could not be received by Ilira, therefore, fhe same are not filed alongwith flie petition or at fhe subsequent stage. He also subinits £hat presently, the petitioner has sustained a fracture and he is bed ridden, therefore, imiaediately he is not in a position to aiove to fhe traiisferred Traasfer is aii iacidence of service. No person working on a transferable post can claim to be posted at a particulai' place. It is for the employer to see fhat who should be posted where iii the iaterest of better functioning of ftie departinent as also iii the public interest, It is fhe setfled view of Uie Apex Court that uiiless fbe order of transfer is vitiated bv m.ala&de or extraneous consideration or is against aiiy statutor}' Rules or Act, it caniiot be iuterfered by a Court of Law. Learued couasel for tlie petitioner could not show as to how the seiiiority ofthe petitioner would be affected and how the order is bad in law pai-ticulai-ly on flie grounds of raalafides, extraaeous considerations or agaiast the Rules or flie Act. Further, this traiisfer order has been passed as back as on 22/3 / 2007 aad it is being chaUenged before this Coiu-t by filia^ fhis petition on 10/09/2007. In view of the above, I am. not iaclmed to iaterfere with fhis ordei~. The petition has no m.erit aiid the same is disnussed at fhe luotiou stage itself. Sdf- Sunil KumarSinha Judge