IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 622 OF 2009 DR. DEEPA SUNIL NADKARNI ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Shri R. G. Ramani, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Ms. S. Vaidya, Advocate for Respondent No.3. Shri A. N. S. Nadkarni, Senior Advocate with Shri H. D. Naik, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Shri S. Bandodkar, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent No.1. Coram:- SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 14th December, 2009 P.C.:- Heard. Affidavit in reply filed by Respondent No.3 be placed on record. The petition was initially filed by the Petitioner stating that the Petitioner ought to be considered for the appointment of the post of Lecturer in Radiology, and the Petitioner had contended that she was similarly qualified as Respondent No.3. Since then, Respondent No.2/Goa Public Service Commission has filed an affidavit and has stated that they will start the entire selection process de novo. In the light of the said statement, learned Counsel on behalf of the Petitioner does not wish to press for this petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed as withdrawn. The challenge of Respondent No.3 would remain open to the cancellation of selection process. SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.