... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3108 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.3108 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.3108 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri Abdul Kadar Millwala i/by Shri Girish Kulkarni for the Applicant. Shri A.S.Shitole, A.P.P. for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : AUGUST 25, 2006. : AUGUST 25, 2006. : AUGUST 25, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocates appearing for the parties. After having heard the Advocates appearing for the parties, I find that no case is made out for transfer. I have perused the order passed by the learned Principle Judge of the City Civil Court. In the said order he has noted that hearing of the case started before a particular Judge and certain witnesses were examined before him. On 03rd September, 2005 the case was assigned to another learned Judge who has recorded evidence of atleast four witnesses. The prayer in the Application before the Sessions Court was for transfer of the case to the learned Judge who was seized of the matter before 03rd September, 2005. In my view, the learned Principle Judge was right in rejecting the prayer for transfer. There is no merit in the Application and the same is rejected. ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE