IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27975 of 2011 Ram Prit Yadav, son of Late Kameshwari Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 25.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 323, 307, 379, 353, 504, 506 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code. Prosecution case is that the accused persons got enraged at the official of the Electricity Department for having conducted raid in their village to prevent theft of electricity and assaulted them. Considering the nature of offence and the reason why the occurrence took place, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner even though there is no specific overt act against him. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge if his case is not bifurcated for the purpose of commitment and charge. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)