WPSB no. 762/02: Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri B.D. Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rajendra Dobhal, learned counsel for the University/respondents. Counsel for the parties have submitted that the controversy raised by means of this writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court delivered on 11.08.2003 passed in writ petition no. 3312 (S/S)2001 (Yogendra Singh Khokar vs. G.B. Pant University and others), as such, the present writ petition may also be disposed of on the same terms and observations expressed in the aforesaid judgment. In view of the aforesaid statement the present writ petition is also disposed of on the same terms and observations made in writ petition no. 3312 (S/S)2001 (Yogendra Singh Khokar vs. G.B. Pant University and others), delivered on 11.08.2003. The only difference is that in the cited case the petitioner was posted as Field Assistant, while in the present matter the petitioner is posted as Field Supervisor, which carries similar pay- scale. (M.M.G., J.) 27.04.2007: VKS