THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.22134 of 2011 ORDER: The relief sought for in this writ petition is to declare the action of the official respondents, more particularly respondent No.5, in issuing notice dated 28.7.2011 directing the petitioners to attend spot inspection on 4.8.2011 at 11.00 a.m., for conducting survey and demarcation of land in Sy.Nos.578/4 corresponding to T.S.No.5/1, Block –A, Ward – 163 of Bagh Amberpet Village, Amberpet Mandal, Hyderabad on the pretext of the order dated 24.6.2011 in W.P.No.17620 of 2011, as arbitrary and illegal. Heard Sri Resu Mahender Reddy, Learned counsel of the petitioners, G.P. for Revenue (Telangana Area) appearing on behalf of respondents 1 to 5 and Sri S.Sridhar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents 6 to 11. Learned G.P. for Revenue (Telangana area) has placed before this Court a copy of the notice dated 9.8.2011 wherein the 5th respondent states that, in the earlier notice, there was a typographical error and, instead of W.P.19296/11 , W.P.17620/11 was mentioned; and that the writ petition may be read as W.P.19296/11. The order of this Court in W.P.19296/11 dated 18.7.11 is also extracted in the notice and as per the said order the date for survey is fixed on 16.8.2011 at 11.00 a.m. The petitioners grievance in this writ petition is that despite no order being passed by this Court in W.P.17620/11, the 5th respondent had issued notice as if this Court had directed him to do so. As the error in the earlier notice has been rectified, and a fresh notice dated 9.8.2011 has been issued fixing the date of spot inspection as 16.8.2011, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive necessitating adjudication by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs. __________ 9-8-2011 Asp