(T'g HKEH SOUR? CF CHHATTI§GARH AT B§LASPUR Simie Beneh : Honwe s’nri amp Raesaheb §gshmukh, .3, Traas§er f-’e‘iiiior3 fCiWéE No.$ of 2W7 ii‘xwiicam Ra$hm§ Mishra, Wis Saraios’n Kumar Mishra, aged abaut 25 yeays, residen‘c 0f Be§a§u§a, Kharraghat, PS Chakradhar, Raigam {CG} \JQYSEJS $59n-Ag3mkam »- Saniosh Kumar mshra: $/D Smi Nageshwar Mishra, aged abaut 34 yeaa’s, Ric Q!.Na.?08/2, Wi:‘e!e$s Coiony, PIS Tarbahar, Bilaspur; Yah5i! am Districi Biéasp‘ur (CG) immikaiian unéea’ Sed§on 24 0? ”ihe Genie of CM: Procedufe P‘resent: S??? MSGupia and Smé. Hamida Siddique, caunsei f9! ’me peiir‘iioner. Shri KA‘Amari, $emog’ Advacate Wm} She’i MKsinha, caamei fer me respondent. $€5ms§a Petitien §Crimina5§ No.3 sf 286$ Aaamicam Santosh Kumar §§£ishra, S/o Sim wanuAaniicant Nageshwar Mishra, aged about 34 years, Rio Qr.N9.?O8I2, Wireless Cclony, PIS Tarba‘nar, Biiaspur, Tahsii arid Distriet B§laspu¥ (CG) VerSUS Nan-App§§cants 1. Rashmi Mishra, Wk: Saniceh Aebiicani‘s Kumar Miehra, aeé abeut 24 years, 2. Kumari Pihoo Mishfa. D10 Saratosh Kumar Mishra. aged about 8 menihs, minor; through mother Smt. Rashmi meme, 80th res§dem5 0f Beladu‘ia,‘ Kharrag‘nat, PS Chakredhar, Raigam (CG) §A§amicai§on under $ec€ien 433? e§ the Ceeie 3f miminai Proceéure g w ?;‘esent’: Sim KAAnsari, Senisr Advocate with Sm M.K.S§nha, sowsei fea' éhe petmoner. $" MEGupia and Smt. Hamida Siddique, ceunsei for 1 _ me resgcndents. {gm-x2. QRBER igaggesé an ms 313i {my of %J%ar¢h, 2eqe) This ardef sha§i gavem Transfer Pei§iiori {CW} N0.5 of 2007 and Tmwi‘vr Petmon (Crimmai) No.3 of 2008. l Aq' (2) Transfea' Pe€§tion (Civii) No.6 of 2am has been prefewed by Rashmi Méshfa far transfer cf Casé No.50-A/2606 undgr Secikm 13(1){ia} of me Hindu Mamage Act fwm Family Court, Bilaswf ta Famih; Com, Raigarh. Tmnsfer Petition (Criminai); N03 sf 2098 has been grefen’ec} by $an€osh Kumar Mishfa for tramfer of M.J.C. No.64z’2006 under seciion 125 of {he Code of Crimina§ Procedwe fmm Family’Couri, Raigarh is Famiiy Court, Qiiaspw. {3} Arguirag f0? Rashmi M§shm §or €fansfer of Case No.50-A/2605, Smt. HamEéa Siddique, ieamed oounsei urged that Sanfosh Kumar Méshfa has no? paié azay amoum ‘Eowards maimenanoo is her aod, thefefore, She is unabze to go éo Bi§aspur for aitendmg Case No.5G- A/Ziwa. Reiiame was piacod on Aojaii Asimk $ao‘i’1wam vs. Ashok §§§$hmcha§2d $3¢§§wai£ 263$ NR $CW 7§Q. x {4} Qn h o oi‘ir‘ae? hand, Ehyi K.A.Ao3ar§, ioameo SeniOf Ao‘vocate for éhe hosbanai $antosh Kumar Mishra mged m Transfer 9etiiiom {Crimea} No.3 of 2906 the? Santosh Kumar Miehra is on death bed am} eoffering from an inourabze d§sease, §.e., Hepatitis ‘B’ aod mes”— Cirmosis. §t was a!so mged by the learned Seniof Advocate thef due %o we exiwme iii—health, $emoeh Kumar M§shra has mt resumed duty am s thaefore, net receivii‘ig any sa§ary. {n these aimumsiances, !eamed Semis? Advosate urged that it is imp03$§bie fa! Saratc$h Kama? M§sh¥a is irave! from B§§aspur i0 Raigam. kt was painted cu? that eh 2Q~§~2GG$ ihis Court had difected thai Santosh Kumar Mk; fa shaii be exemméd from pe¥sanai apgearanse befwe ihe Famiiv Cam. Raigam far a pemd a? éws manihs. {5} k3 the pecuimi’ circumsiances mentioned abeve, ta baiame ihe Emom’eniem‘g faced by the wié‘e and ihe serieus mness of the hLgsband‘ 2$ saerd that me Famiw Cour. Biiasgmr sha§§. an aia apwcatiw beiag med 0:1 behaif o? Rashmi Mishya, exemp‘t her’fro’m pe¥sona§ appeai‘ame and aiiaw he! i0 appea; ihrough coun3e§ k1 CaseNo50- £12006 exce§i 0n the daie of her evideme. ‘s rega¥d$ MJE. N0.64/2{308 pending befsre ’zhe Family Ceuri, Raigayh, §i §s d§r$5cied mm k i [me Fam§£v Couri Raigaih sha%§, on'aa agpiicatim being f§§ed (m behes?” ’§ Samesh Kuma? Mishra, exemp’g him frem pe¥sene§ appeafamce ami O abw him te apeeaa’ thi’ough ecumei. {5) With the above observaiiens, Tramsfe? Pet§i§cn whiig) 1n 1 5&5 § ox .: 2%? em Ts-“afzefer Pe€§é§en (Cé'imma!) Ne3 o? 28% aye diseased 0?. A new e?‘ this erder be phased om the xvecord 0f Ti'anefer Peiititm {Cr§miaai} Ne3 a? 2605. Sd—/ Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge 7 {7)