IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH AT B8LASPUR (C.G) W.P.(S)NO. ^%\\ OF 2011 PET8TIONER \-1 4 ^: :<^ .^^%-" '>sy ..-•''^'o.y ^7y ^ ^' ^'" ^•••'' ^* ^ RE8PONDENTS Ku.Chandralekha Mandioi, aged about27years, D/o Hinchcharam Mandioi, Shiksha Karmi varg-11, Government Middle Schooi Badgaon, District North Baster Kanker(C.G.) VERSUS :1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Panchayat & WeSfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) ?^£ry^ / 7 ^ ••^^.m?H \~" V, . {^Tg^[©^.]f ?i I^Z"Y^/ "^. -.. - !^ ^ ^ t? g^'.^ 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat North Baster Kanker (C.G.) WRIT PETSTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 QTTHE CONSTITU80N OF 3NDIA ^^r HIGH COXJRT OP CHHATTISOARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON?BLE JU8TICE RB8PONDBNTS W.P.ISi N0. 4811 /2011 Ku. Cbaiidj'alekha. Mandloi yerssis State ofC.G.& Others ^ mDiA .or Appearassee: Shri D.N,Prajapati, coiinsel for the petitioner. Shri A.V.Shridhar, P.L. for fhe State. ORA.L.ORDBR (23.08.2011) Grievaiice of fhe petitioner ia flie proseDt, peti.tion is t:h.at on 10.8-06 she was appo.iated 'as Sliiksha Karmi Grade-II ai-id she coiitmued cn the said post till 23,5,08 but thereailer she was rem.oved from. her post on tlie gro'iiTid •that she has not aiinexed proper experience certificate. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court, the petitioner preferred a statutory appeal before flie Additional' Cominissioner cIiaUenging' fhe validity of her term.iiiBtion order and fhe said appeal was allowed by tbe competent aiithoriu' o.n 5.08,2010. Th.is oider was assailed by the State GoveiTi.meiit before the Secretaiy^ Paiichayat however^ tlie order of the Aiidi.tioii.al ComLmissioiier was also m.aiutam.ed iii appeal. mde order clated 28.4.2011. Accoidiag to fhe couiisel for fhe petitloner •th.ough. fhe onier has bee.n passed in his favoiir but till date she .'has not been allowed to joiii on fhe post ofShiks'faa Kaiiiii Grade-II. Coiinsel for fhe petitioner subinits that fhe liinited prayer of fhe petitioner is that her pendirig represexitations (Aiinexiire P/4) be decided in accordaiice witli law. rH State coun.sel has no objection ifthe pendmg represente.ti.ons of tlie petitioner is decided ia accordaace with law withixi som.e timeframe. The present petition is disposed of wifh a direction to the respondent. No.2 to decide the pending representatioiis of the petitioner aiid to pass a.ppropriate order as expe<:iitio-asly as'possible, Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge