-C^^^-^7 w IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR W.P.(S) N0. G303 /2010 PETITIONERS ^A^ ^"^<1 ...-•" ^^-^ ^ ^•^ ^.^ <<"<7>< \ <\^ \Q ' Y=a 1. Vishnu Prasad Painkara, S/o Gulabsai Painkara, aged about 53 years, Lecturer, High School tf Mahloi, Village + P.0. Mahloi, Block- Tamnar, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) ^' 2.' Angad Ram Bhagat, S/o Shri Dasha Ram Bhagat, aged about 58 years, Vill. and Post Bturakachhar, Tahsil Gharghoda, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS f^^RESPONDENTS 1 ^" State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Raigarh, Distt. -Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDBR ARTICLE226 OF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 2. $ y^?^ IfISii "%^^XS^HC—?S ^""•^my^.--' ^ST r<)l^i<"i4, ^TQy^t^, fstdl^^< ^_...U£:...^...')....£^.:...6^/co *^cb *II*ICTI <»»*<ich """"""""""""""""""""""^( 200 3;1I^T'(I5R? ("^^Sl^) ^S^ K'1|cb ^T°ff ^H^T^WcF WTTW^^^n^T SB : HON?BLE MR. JU8TKCE PmtlKKBR DEWAKBR 29.S0.201G Shri SonikaB.t Vei-ma, covi'm Shri.Vaibhav Goverdliaii, P,'. Grieyan.cc of t3ie peti.tione.rij that they were appointed as Assis scale of Rs. 100-150 for a pei com.pl.etion of proba-tion, th.ey wer^ Rs. 169-300. Contention of tlie counsel fi| are entitled for regular pay scale| iiiitial a.ppoiatBient aiid theii* a num.ber of decisions pa.ssed b] jiidgment rendered by fhe M.P. Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 Vs. State of M.P. & • Other.s)' smiilarly placed teachers are enti^ fhe date of fh.eii* iriitial appoiD.tiD.ei It is not disputed by both taken up by the State to fhe Apex] disniissed by tlie Apex Court Tribunal to the effect that the Te^ entitled for regiilar pay scale appomtiaent, In view of tlie above subin.it thejjarties, the petitioii is dispos€}d fezft7[ '^TO^ff ^ 'fe^St' <Fai^l< ^^^fima^r d for th.e petilioners, .. for the State. 4 in the preseiit petition ere jtaiit Teachers on. a fixed pay ijiod of tw^o years aad after granted regular pay scale of |>r the petitioners is tliat tfaey wifh effect from. th.e date. of Ise is sauarely covered with. fhis Couxt a.nd also tlie |tate Ad.miD.istrative Tribunal.^ |1!^adhuMa2xfc Yadii 85 56 dthers wherein. it h-as been held that |led fbr regulai' pay scale fro-m It. parties that .fhe nialter wa.s ICoiirt but the appeal was also ujpholdiiig the decision of the ictiers/Assistaat Teachers. ai'e fi'om the date- of fheir mi.ti.ai. »sionmade by the counsel for ofin the same terms i.e. the f|i.e y\ petilioners are graiited liberty to make a represeiitation, if so XI-HC—78 NI*«!11 (h^l^ 's^ ^ww^, ^-^\ww, fsxni^^ ..U.fc.l^)...€l?.:...L^^200 3TI^?T T5R7 ( ^f^^) ''sn^i ^T f^rNF WT 3??^T^RW \ '^TOT'R^T^^^T aforesslid advised, in tlie Mght of the dated 13.1.2009 (Annexure P/6) respondent is directed to consideij aad in its perspective. If the pej footing as per order passed by fh^ iii Madhukaat Yadu (supra) and s| Suprenie Court in Special Leave order dated 3.1.1995, the petitio4< retief accordmgly. It is expected froin tlie stat^ order after due scnitmv of the facth ^sjid ju.dgm.ent and fh.e circular land in. turo., tlie concenied their ca.se on its owis. merits titioners staiid on. the saxne State Adm.mistoate Tribuiial |jLbsequently confirmed by tlie Fjetitiou (Civil) No. 6892/93 by m.ay be enti'tled to saiae loil.ers cnnf^^li ^FR^f ^ 'fexst <P»i^i< ir^ifw 3??^r ? aufliorities to pass suitable Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge