1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 390 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 390 OF 2011 *** 1. Heard Advocate Mr. Kutti for the Petitioner. Advocate Mr. Sonawane who appears for Respondent No.6 is not present. However, the contentions raised by Advocate Mr. Sonawane are already looked into by this Court on 7th March, 2011 and this Court has already passed appropriate orders redressing the same. 2. Challenge in present matters is to orders dated 18th September, 2008 passed by District Consumer Forum in Complaint no.546 of 2008 and 547 of 2008 respectively. Petitioners before this Court are the members of executive committee of cooperative society. 3. The controversy is already concluded by judgment of this Court dated 22nd December, 2010 in Writ Petition No.5223 of 2009. The 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 390 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. said judgment is also followed by me in various matters including writ petition No. 11067 and 11071 of 2010 decided on 21st February, 2011. In view of this position, the present writ petition is partly allowed. The impugned orders, to the extent they permit action against person or property of petitioners are quashed and set aside. 4. Needless to mention that respective consumers are free to proceed against the society for recovery of their dues. 5. Rule is made absolute accordingly. No costs. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:04/05/2011. ans/390