[/r- -$l^ 2^ Petitioner ResDondente jGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH: BiLASPUR WritPetition 2431 of 2003 Dashrath, Afle 60 vears. S/o. Shri Heeradas Gang Man, G.No.54' P.W.I. S.E. Rly, Champa (CG). Versus 1. The Union of jndia, Ministry of^Raiiway, New Delhi. 2. Assistant Dsvisionai Enaineer. S.E. Raiiwav. Champa (CG). 3. Junior Engineer (P-Way), Qr.No.1, S.E. Raiiway, Korba (CG). (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 ofConstitution of india) SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, u. Present Mr. B.K. Chakraborty, c-ounss! for the petitioner. Mr. Abhishek Sinha, counssl for the respondents. ' ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 10th day of February, 2009) The petitibner was an employee of South Eastern Raiiwav, BiiasDur. The petitioner has fiied this petition before this court seeking fofiowing reiiefs: "1) That the Hon'ble Court may kindiy be pieased to cal! for the entire records leading to issuance of the impugned order for kind perusal. 2) That the pentioner pray for earn leave and other payment which is mentloned in theorder dated 10-10-2000 passed by Hon'ble CAT, Jabaipur, i.e., Annexure P-!l. 3} That the petltioner pray for compensation of de!ay payment v/hich has created by the respondent No.2. 4) That pass any order is deemed fit and necessary by the Hon'ble Court In the interest ofjustice." 2) The main reiief sought for by the petitioner in this petition is that the respondents may be directedto comply with theorder dated 10-10-2000 passed by the Central Administrath/e Tribunai, (for short, "the Tribunal") Jabalpur (Annexure P/2). c- /' ~~ Raju 3) Be that as it may, the Tribunal is in existence. If the petitioner is of the viewthatthe order ofthe Tribunal dated 10-10-2000 has not been comDiied with. the petitioner has to approach the Tribunai. Even otherwise, the petitioner is a Central Government employee, thus, this petition is maintainabie before the Tribunal oniy under Section 14 of the Administrative Tribunais Act, 1985, not before the High Court under Articie 226 of the Constiiution of India. 4) in view of the foregoing, this petition is dismissed as not maintainable. However, liberty is reserved to the peSitioner to take recourse to the provisions of law. if so advised. Sd/- SatishIC.AgniIiotri Judge >