6'4^ 1^v>^ _ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fCG^ WRITPETITION fS) N0). 4<2r^7:2007 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTLQN OF INDIA, PETITIONER ^ ^y' . ^•••' ,\: ^•''"/'••" ;'^^ •y «: RESPONDENTS / 1. 2. 3. Kumari Kamla Kerketta (B.Ed.), aged about 40 years, daughter of Shri Mathiyas Kerketta, Assistant Teacher, Government Tribal Girls Higher Secondary School Kushmi, Distt. Surguja (CG) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner, Deptt of Tribal Welfare, Surguja (CG) Block Education Officer Kusmi, Distt. Surguja (CG) •5^. XI-HC-78 sTr^rqirl^iR; tiwsn^Taw Bablu '0\' *11*1<»11 9b*liq» 3^'<ii'!<ici<i, ®xn*i'is,Riciiyy __ ^- C. C^jJo.62-2- ^2007 OP t?T Ma<n (yl^isiyl') WtTTWflfersiI^T 1.2.2007 Mr. Ranjeet famar Ma Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel z^tmdar, counsel for the petitioners. WEth the consent of fa^med counsel for the parties, the matters are heard fmaSiy wid o'isposed of. Common order dictate A copy of -rtiis order be •t.l^fcl^H liwl'tffe'^fl <R|WK ^Sff^ITSn^T wyer for the respondents/State. in W.P. (s) No. 621 of 2007 in open Court, placed on record in connected writ petitions Sd/- SatishK.Ag Judge P.T.O. HI6H COURT OF CHH/tTTTSfeSRH^AF BIUSPU8 SIN61E BENCH ; HON'BLE MR. S^TISH K. A6NWOTRI. J. WRTT PETn~roN(s) NO. 621 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Responctents Chintamani Tiwari Stateof Chhatt-isgarh cnd others WRTT PETmON ts) NQ^^ZOF 2QQ7 Petitioner Resoondents versus famari Kamfa Kerketta State of Chhattisgarh and others WRTT PETmON (s) N0^6210^2007 Petitioner versus Resoondents 5.R. Nirala 5tate of Chhattisgarh and others And WRir PETTTrON (s) |SLQ_624^F 2007 Petjtioner versus Resoondents Nagesh Kumar Rathia State of Chhattisgarh and others Present : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Mazumdar, counsel for the petitioners. Ms. 5unita Jajn, Panel tawyer for the STate/ reqsondenrs, OR D E R (Passed on Ihis Ist February. 2007} 1. Leamed counsel cppear'mg for the petitioners as well as leamed . f'" Penal lawyer appearing for the respondents/Stat®jointly .submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ peti+ion are squarely covered by the decision of this Court- in the case of yasfweHvt Kumar Bhafwdwaj vs. Mwricipal Corpwatim. Ouny tmd aiwthw>'. 2. For the aforementioned reasons, these writ petitions are disposed of in terms of tiie decision of this Court in the matter of yashwanf Kumar BhafvdwaJ(5u^ra}, subject to verification of the fact asto whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.T.I. Certificates at •riieir own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further wrfiether tiiey have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be ptacecl on re.cord m connected writ petitions. Sd/- SatisbK.Agmhotri Judge 1 2006CtI)MPJR-C696 Bablu