BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Fourteenth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.13576 of 2011 1. THANGARAJ 2. C. SOUNDARAPANDI 3. N. MANICKAM 4. OM PRAKASH 5. NAGARAJ 6. K. SELVARAJ ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED 2,4,5,6,7 & 10 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PATTIVEERANPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, CRIME NO.314/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. VEERA KATHIRAVAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAY, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest the petitioners in Crime No.314 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 323, 324, 307 and 506(ii) of the Indian Penal Code, have come forward with this petition seeking for anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of the prosecution, due to election motive, the petitioners and other accused attacked the de-facto complainant with sticks and one accused attacked him with iron rod. 3. Even according to the FIR, he sustained contusion in the shoulder and there is no other injury sustained by the de-facto complainant. 4. But the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the injured is still undergoing treatment. 5. The second petitioner is present before this Court today. He would submit that because of political influence, the de-facto complainant is kept in the hospital as in-patient, though he ahs not sustained any injury. 6. I have considered the above submissions. 7. A perusal of the FIR would go to show that the de-facto complainant has sustained only a small contusion in the shoulder and there is no other injury. 8. Having regard to the political motive between the parties and the nature of injury and all other attending circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 9. Accordingly the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai, on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police every day at 10.30 am., for a period of four weeks. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C Scrupulously. sd/- 14/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NILAKOTTAI 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PATTIVEERANPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. VEERA KATHIRAVAN Advocate SR.No.35683 GH : 14.10.2011 : 2p/6c ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13576 of 2011 Date :14/10/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/