- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. CONTINUATION SHEET. CONTINUATION SHEET. WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. PETITION NO. PETITION NO.8541 OF 2004 OF 2004 OF 2004 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Mr.A.K.Patil for the Petitioner CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : JANUARY 19, 2006. : JANUARY 19, 2006. : JANUARY 19, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Shri Patil appearing for the Petitioner. The Petitioner had filed a dispute under Section 91 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 before the Cooperative Court for challenging the recovery certificate issued under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The dispute was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The order of the Cooperative Court was challenged by the Petitioner by filing an Appeal before the Cooperative Appellate Court. The Appeal has been dismissed on merits. 2.After having heard Shri Patil for the - 2 - Petitioner, I find that there is no error in the impugned Judgment and Order. It is obvious that the remedy of preferring Revision Application under Section 154 of the said Act of 1960 is always available to the Petitioner for challenging the certificate issued under Section 101 of the said Act. 3. Subject to what is stated above, Petition is rejected with no order as to costs. JUDGE. JUDGE. JUDGE.