WP(C) 3593/2011 BEFORE HON\BLE MR JUSTICE B D AGARWAL Heard Mr. BC Das, learned senior counsel for the writ petitioner. Also heard Mr. U.C Rabha, learned counsel for the private respondent No.3. The petitioner herein is challenging the Orders dated 22.09.2009, 05.04.2010 and 16.06.2011 passed by the District Forum, Kamrup, Guwahati in Complain Case No. 5 of 2008 and miscellaneous cases. Apparently, the orders passed by the District Forum are appealable und er Section 15 and 27 A of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Admittedly, Mr. Rab ha, learned counsel for the private respondent admitted this legal position. Hen ce, the petitioner is hereby given the liberty to approach the State Consumer wi thin a period of 1(one) week from today. If there is any delay in filing the app eal, the appeal memo shall accompany a condonation application and the delay sha ll be condoned in view of the fact that the petitioner had approached the State Commission earlier also on one occasion but the appeal was dismissed for want of cause of action. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of .