WP(C) 3913/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. SN Sarma, learned senior counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. I Choudhury, learned standing counsel, PWD appearing for the respondents. The grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is relating to n on taking of the final measurement of the work done by him pursuant to the commu nication dated 13.2.2009 issued by the Asst. Executive Engineer, PWD, Sonitpur R ural Road Sub-Division, respondent No. 4. Mr. Choudhury, learned standing counsel on instruction has submitted tha t in fact such measurement has been done. Mr. Sarma, learned senior counsel after obtaining instruction from the p etitioner has submitted that since the measurement of the work done by the petit ioner has been taken by the authority concerned, the writ petition may be dispos ed of directing the authority concerned to pass necessary orders for payment of whatever amount is found due and payable to the petitioner under the contract, a part from releasing the earnest money deposited. Mr. Choudhury, learned standing counsel submits that since the measureme nt has been done the necessary follow up action will be taken relating to the en titlement of the petitioner, if any. Having regard to the submission made by the learned counsel for the part ies, this writ petition is disposed of directing the Chief Engineer PWD (Roads) to pass necessary orders relating to the amount, if any, payable to the petition er under the contract apart from the claim of the petitioner for refund of the e arnest money deposited. The same shall be done within a period of two months fro m the date of production of the certified copy of the order passed today by the petitioner before the said authority. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.