IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15273 of 2011 TULSI SAH @ TULSI PD. GUPTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 19.05.2011 Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in complaint case no. 74 of 2004 registered under Sections 420, 423, 465 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is that the complainant’s land has been sold by accused Saryug Sah. On the sale deed the petitioner is witness. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in solemn affirmation the complainant has not named the petitioner. In view of this court, it is a good case for grant of regular bail. This court is not inclined to interfere only because the complaint was filed in 2004. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner and try to dispose off the same preferably on the same day if possible considering the aforesaid submissions made by the learned 2 counsel for the petitioner if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within a period of four weeks from today. With this observation, this application is disposed off. Let the order be faxed to the learned J.M. Ist Class, Kaimur at Bhabhua in connection with complaint case no. 74/04 at the cost of the petitioner. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)