HiQH COURT OF CHHATTIBGARHAJSilAI M.C.C.No.239of2011 Appiicant Patram Singh Verma, S/o Late Dsshrath Verma, aged aboul 75 years, R/o Viilage Narhada, Post, Narhada; Tahsii & District Raipur Ghhattlsgarh) (Respondent No.2f'dsfendant No.2) V'ei'sus Respondents 1. Smt.Prabha Bai, W/o Nathuisi Tiwari, R/'o VIHage Narhsda, District Ralpur, Chhattisga'ti (AppeSSant/PisinfJff) 2. Gramin Seva Sahkari Samiti Narhada, Disfrict Ralpur, Chhattisgarh (Respondent No.l/Defendant No.1) (Applicatlon U/0 41 Ruie 21 read with Section 151 of C.P.C. for rehearirQ of S.A.No.21/1994 dedded ex.parte) (S3: Hon'bie Mr. T.P. Sharma, J.) Mr.Sachin Singh Rajput, counsei fo?" ths spplicait. iRDER SORAU {.Passed ora 28" Aprli, 2S11) 1. The pressnt appiication has been flied after 148 dsys of its limitation. 2. Heam on i.A.No.1 for condonatlon of delay in fiiing the app!icd:ion. 3. Leamed counsel for the appilcant submits that he may be parmiftsd to fiie SLP before the Supreme Court. 4. On perusal, i Qo not find any ground for condonation of dalay. Consequently, t.A.No.1 is ilable to be dismissed and it is hereby dlsmissed. M.C.C. Is aiso dismissed. Hov»ever, the appilcant js at iiberty So approach before corrtpetent forum. No oroer as to costs. T.P.Sharma Judge ~<°^"'-' "^ ^/