26. wp 8567-10.doc RMA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8567 OF 2010 Maharashtra Rajya Us Todani Vahatuk Mukadam Kamgar Union .. Petitioner Vs The State of Maharashtra & Ors .. Respondents Mr. R.B. Raghuvanshi a/w Ms. Rutuja Ambekar for the Petitioner Mr. Vijay Patil, GP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 Mr. Zakri Ali i/b Mr. Bhushan Mahadik for Respondent No. 5 CORAM : S.A. BOBDE & SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ DATE : 16th DECEMBER, 2011. P.C.: 1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties. 2. Mr. Patil, learned GP states that the Commissioner of Sugar will consider the petitioner's grievance regarding insurance for labourers engaged in harvesting of sugarcane and take appropriate decision. We are of the view that the said course suggested by Mr. Patil, the learned GP, is appropriate. We direct that the Commissioner of Sugar shall hear the representation of the petitioner and allow them to produce 1 26. wp 8567-10.doc appropriate material in their support. The Commissioner of Sugar shall take appropriate decision within six months. 3. Rule is disposed of in above terms. [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J ] [ S.A. BOBDE, J ] 2 26. wp 8567-10.doc 3