((-1-)) HVN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION FERA APPEAL NO. 16 OF 2007 Union of India ... Appellants Versus Jaysukh Salot ... Respondents Mr. R.V. Desai, Sr. Counsel with Mrs. S.V. Bharucha and Mr. A.S. Rao for Appellant. None for Respondent. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED: AUGUST 31, 2007 DATED: AUGUST 31, 2007 DATED: AUGUST 31, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The tribunal by its order has held as under : " ...... The FRI from invoices, airway bills, shipping bills, bills of exchange, bank certificates were signed by MMTC. There is no document to show that appellant was associated with export. ...." . The case of the respondents was that he had an agreement with MMTC. In terms of the agreeement, he used to supply the diamonds to MMTC for export to foreign countries. The tribunal found that the according to agreement, it was MMTC who were being exporting and that there was no clause imposing any ((-2-)) responsibility on the appellant before it to realise the export proceedings and came to the conclusion that the appellant was not responsible for realisation of dues. . The only contention that the appellants before this court and respondent before the tribunal has raised is that the agreement between the respondents herein and M.M.T.C. was that in the event the export did not take place, the appellant was to refund advance of 90% by MMTC. That would not result in respondents before it becoming exporter. It was only an agreement in case of default for refund of money. In other words, no case made out for interference. The order of the tribunal does not suffer from any illegality. Appeal dismissed. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)