IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.21543 of 2011 Date of Decision:- November 21, 2011 Ram Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH Present: Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Satish Kumar Mittal, J. (Oral) The petitioner has filed the instant writ petition directing respondent No.2 to consider his claim for allotment of alternative plot in lieu of plot bearing No.459-B, Sector 1, Phase-I, HUDA, Narnaul. It is the case of the petitioner that he has purchased the said plot from the original allottee and on his request the plot has been transferred in the name of the petitioner on 20.2.2006 and re-allotment letter has also been issued in favour of the petitioner. It is further the case of the petitioner that since then the petitioner has approached many times to respondent No.2 for giving possession of the said plot but till date on one pretext or the other the possession has not been handed over on the ground that the said plot is under litigation. The petitioner after coming to know this fact made a prayer that in view of the said fact, an alternative plot be Civil Writ Petition No.21543 of 2011 -2- allotted to him. When the alternative plot was not allotted to the petitioner, he served legal notice dated 12.7.2011, copy of which has been annexed with the petition as Annexure P4. It is further the case of the petitioner that respondent No.2 has neither given the possession of the allotted plot to him nor has considered his claim for allotting an alternative plot. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and going through the contents of the petition, at this stage, we have decided to dispose of this writ petition without issuing notice of motion to the other side, as it will unnecessary delay the matter, by issuing direction to respondent No.2 to consider the reasonable claim of the petitioner, which he has made through legal notice (Annexure P4), by passing a speaking order expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months. Ordered accordingly. (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE November 21, 2011 (PARAMJEET SINGH) vkg JUDGE