1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY C.A.J. C.A.J. C.A.J. WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 6412 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 6412 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 6412 OF 2002 Nivrutti Nivrutti Nivrutti Tukaram Nevase etc. Tukaram Nevase etc. Tukaram Nevase etc. ......... Petitioner Petitioner Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra etc. ... Respondents Mr. P.P. More i/by R.B. Jagtap for Petitioner. Mr. C.R. Sonawane, A.G.P. for State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & S.P. S.P. S.P. KUKDAY,JJ. KUKDAY,JJ. KUKDAY,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : MAY 05, 2005 : MAY 05, 2005 : MAY 05, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Rule. Heard forthwith. . The challenge to the award is belated. Considering the judgement of the Apex Court in Municipal Council, Ahmednagar and another Vs. Shah Hyder Beig and Ors. AIR 2000 SC 671 the challenge on that count it will have to be rejected. . The grievance of the Petitioner however is that he has not been paid the compensation. That relief is sought in terms of Prayer Clause (c). Considering that we direct the Petitioner within four weeks from today to apply to respondent No. 3, for the compensation which according to them has not been paid. Respondent NO. 3 on receipt of the application to dispose of the same by a speaking 2 order within twelve weeks thereafter. Rule accordignly made absolute. No order as to costs. (F.I. (F.I. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) REBELLO,J.) REBELLO,J.) (S.P. (S.P. (S.P. KUKDAY,J.) KUKDAY,J.) KUKDAY,J.)