IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 25 OF 1989 IN PETITION NO. 601 OF 1988 Mr.Cherry Hassanand Raney. ... Plaintiff. V/s. Shri Chiku P. Advani. ... Defendant. None for the parties. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 10th December 2007. DATED: 10th December 2007. DATED: 10th December 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . On 26th November, 2007, nobody was present on behalf of plaintiff. Consequently, matter was adjourned for one week with direction to show this matter under caption "FOR DISMISSAL". Accordingly, on 3rd December, 2007, matter appeared in the causelist. One Shri Mishra appeared for the plaintiff and sought one week time to file affidavit of evidence along with documents. Today, when the matter was called out, neither the plaintiff nor his advocate is present. Neither affidavit of evidence nor a single document is filed on record. Under these circumstance, suit is dismissed for want of evidence with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)