WM wm %sn%mm W.P. Si No.6899 l 2008 (Petition UIA 26 of Constitution of India) Single Bench; Hon’ble Mr. 1D. 12.2003 Shli Ajay Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioners. Shn' Pankaj Shrivastasva, Panel Lawyer for the State. Heard. The petitioner is working under the respondents. He was given two advance increments for undergoing family planning operation as per nxation of salary rules of Annexure P—2. However, while nxing his salary as per recommendation of 5th Pay Commission, the two advance increments aheady given to the petitioner, have not been taken into consideration. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in this matter has een finally settled by the Madhya Pradesh Administrative lribunal vidr order dated 20$ February 2001 passed in Original Application No. 100 / 1999 in the matter of Jawahar§ingh Vs.’ i t w . PETITIONER Dr. Kumar Advani, age about 51 years, Aymvgdic Medical Of&cer, S/o Shri B.N. Advzni ‘Ayush’ Mantralaya Parisar, Old Nun es Hosttl Raipur, DiStt.—Ra.ipur (CG) ‘ Vs RESPONDENTS 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, thJDugh — the _ Secr‘ataly Health 85 Family Welfare Dep' ent, D.K.S‘ Bhawan, Distt—Raipur ‘ (CG) '2. Dire tor, Directorate Ayurved, D,K.S. Bha an, Raipur, Distt‘ Raipur, (CG) WW WIWR ami—tdwm State of MP. & Others . He fmth€r submits that he is not pressing this petition at this stage, however, hle suitable representation be above grievahces, who may Within the specified period in the light of the judgment in the matter Jawahar Singh Vs. State of M. On the other hand, leai ned counsel for the State submits that if ' the petitioner tiles fresh representation before the respondent No. 1 for redressal of above grievances within a period of one week from today along with copy of this order, by the respondent No.1, in period of 8 weeks hem the da‘ In View of the above parties, this petiu'on is dispo: fresh representation before tt grievances, within a period of this order On such represer shall dec1de the same Withn receipt of the representation 1 he prays for liberty to the petitioner to fore the respondent No. 1 for redressal of be furtheradimcted to decide the same P. & others (supra). ‘ e same shall be considered and decided accordance with law, within a further :e of receipt of the representation. submission of learned counsel for the ;ed of with liberty to the petitioner to file e respondent No. 1 for redressal of above one week from today along with copy of tation being made the respondent No 1 1 a period of 8 weeks fiom the date of ’1 accordance With law / / w Mxshra' 4/ Dmw" a udge [new