IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32573 of 2009 LALAN YADAV @ LALU YADAV S/O PRYAG YADAV, R/O VILLAGE- HATHIYAPAR,P.S.- LAKHSHMIPUR, DISTRICT- JAMUI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 10/02/2010 Heard Mr. Irshad learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code against unknown regarding train dacoity involving Patna Hatia Express. Submission is that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and he has not been put on test identification parade though he is in custody since 27.4.2009. Name of the petitioner has been dragged in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused ShrawanTeli. Impugned order mentions that one looted mobile was recovered from his possession but the petitioner claims the same to be his own. Report received from the S.P. Lakhisarai shows that the petitioner is a man of fair antecedent. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Railway J.M./concerned 2 Court, Kiul in connection with G.R.P. Jhajha P.S. Case No. 10 of 2009. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)