1 app586.06.sxw Ast/- IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL SIDE JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 586 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.808 OF 2005 P.Pitchumani. .. Appellant. V/s. M/s.Duke Off-Shore (P) Ltd.& Anr. .. Respondents. --- Mr. A.D.Shetty for the Appellant. None for Respondents. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH AND V.R.KINGAONKAR,JJ. DATED: APRIL 15, 2010 P.C.: 1. By this Appeal, Appellant challenges the order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 12th June, 2006. By that order, learned Single Judge has rejected the Writ Petition filed by the Petitioner holding that there is no reason to disturb the Award 2 app586.06.sxw made by the Labour Court. Reference was made to the Labour Court by the Government in relation to the validity of the termination of the Petitioner. The Labour Court held by its award that the Appellant was not workman within the meaning of Industrial Disputes Act. It was challenged in the Writ Petition. The learned Single Judge has passed detailed order considering the material on record and holding that the finding recorded by the Labour Court needs no interference. 2. We have heard learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant. We have gone through the record. The finding recorded by the Labour Court is based on appreciation of evidence on record. After having gone through the evidence, it cannot be said that there is no evidence on record to support the finding recorded by the Labour Court. In our opinion, in the appellate jurisdiction, we cannot reappreciate the evidence once it is found that there is some evidence on record on the basis of which finding has been recorded by the Labour Court. In our Opinion, it 3 app586.06.sxw will not be justified to interfere in the concurrent findings. Appeal therefore, is dismissed. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J.) (V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.)