IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 26TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 4TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 20771 of 2011(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- VASANTHA.B., GEETHALAYAM, PADA NORTH, KARUNAGAPPALLY.P.O., KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DIST. PIN-690518. BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT (HRD) REPRESENTED BY THE DIRECTOR, INSTITTUTE OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. PIN-695001. BY GOVT.PLEADER SHRI V.VIJULAL FOR R1 ADV. SRI.V.A.MOHAMMED, SC, IHRD FOR R-2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 20771 of 2011(V) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT.P1: COPY OF LETTER ISSUED BY THE ENGINEERING COLLEGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY DT.5.8.10. EXT.P2: COPY OF JUDGMENT DT.15.3.11 IN W.A.NO.1616/10 AND CONNECTED CASES. EXT.P3: COPY OF ORDER DT.17.6.11. EXT.P4: COPY OF REPRESENTATION DT.10.7.11 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.20771 of 2011 -------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 26th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner was working as a Part Time Sanitary Worker in Engineering College under the Institute of Human Resources Development at Karunagappally. According to the petitioner, she continued there upto 9.11.2006 and was not given employment thereafter. 2. The cause of action for filing this Writ Petition is Exhibit P2 judgment of a Division Bench of this Court wherein the claim of certain ad hoc employees who sought continued employment on ad hoc basis was directed to be considered. 3. The 2nd respondent has filed a counter affidavit. The learned Standing Counsel for the 2nd respondent submitted that the ranked list of Last Grade Servants is in force and 145 candidates were given regular appointment. In addition to that 83 candidates were employed on temporary basis as per this Court's directions, it is stated. W.P.(C)No.20771/11 -2- 4. Evidently, the petitioner was only appointed on part time basis. I am not considering the merits of the claim. It is upto the 2nd respondent to give a suitable reply to the petitioner, which will be done within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Sd/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn