IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 3333 of 2010. Decided on: 15th July, 2010. T.R. Chauhan. ….. Petitioner. Versus Board of Directors, Horticulture Produce Marketing and Processing Corporation Ltd. and another. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Ajeet Saklani, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed for the following prayers: “(i) The respondents may kindly be directed to release all the retiral benefits to the petitioner immediately by issuing writ of mandamus. (ii) The respondents may kindly be directed to pay interest @ 12% on the entire retiral benefits of the petitioner by issuing writ of mandamus. (iii) The respondents may also be directed to release the gratuity amount of the petitioner at the revised rate by issuing writ of mandamus.” 2. Having heard the learned counsel for the respondents, we do not find any formidable ground for not releasing the payment except the submission that the respondent- Corporation does not have sufficient resources. Learned counsel submits that the matter has been taken up with the 2 Government. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of, making it clear that before making any further financial commitment of payment to the tune of Rs. 5 lacs or above, the retiral benefits due to the petitioner shall be disbursed. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 15th July, 2010. ( Justice Rajiv Sharma), (tr) Judge.