IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ELIPE DHARMA RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 9117 of 2000 Between: Gadi Sattibabu, S/o. Venkataraju, R/o. Lutukurru Village, Mamidikuduru Mandal, E.G.District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The District Collector, Kakinada, E.G.District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Amalapuram, E.G.District. 3. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Mamidikuduru Mandal, E.G.District. 4. The Divisional Panchayat Officer, Amalapuram, E.G.District. 5. Sangani Brahmanandam, S/o. Venkatachalam, R/o. Adurru Village, Mamidikuduru Mandal, E.G.District. (R5 is impleaded as per court order dt 23-11-2000 in wpmp.No.26523/2000) 6. Vidani Satyanarayana, S/o. Rama Murthy, R/o. Adurru Village, Mamidikuduru Mandal, E.G.District. (R6 is impleaded as per court order dt 23-11-2000 in wpmp No.26523/2000) 7 Vidani Suryanarayana, S/o. Venkata Ratnam, R/o. Adurru Village, Mamidikuduru Mandal, E.G.District. (R7 is impleaded as per court order dt 23.11.2000 in wpmp No.26523/2000) 8. Ponnamanda Jalachandra Rao, S/o. Lakshmi Narasimham, R/o. Adurru Village, Mamidikuduru Mandal, E.G.District. (R8 is impleaded as per court order dt 23.11.20000 in wpmp No.26523/2000) 9. Videni Lakshmana Swami, S/o. Jagayya @ Jagandham, R/o. Adurru Village, Mamidikuduru Mandal, E.G.District. (R9 is impleaded as per court order dt 23-11-2000 in wpmp No.26523/2000) .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue appropriate Writ or Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 & 3 in interfering with the fishing rights of Fishermen Co-operative Society, Lutkurru granted in their favour by the Gram Panchayat Lutkurru for fishing in drain canal of Lutukurru as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently direct the respondents 2 & 3 not to interfere with the lease hold rights of fishing of fishermen of Lutukurru Village in drain canal of Lutukurru Village Mamikikuduru Mandal in East Godavari District. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in this writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. ______________________ Elipe Dharma Rao, J. 17th June, 2005. Prv ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The District Collector, Kakinada, E.G.District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Amalapuram, E.G.District. 3. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Mamidikuduru Mandal, E.G.District. 4. The Divisional Panchayat Officer, Amalapuram, E.G.District. 5. 2 CCs to G.P. for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 6. 2 CD copies THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ELIPE DHARMA RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 9117 of 2000 17th June, 2005.