IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN FRIDAY, THE 13TH AUGUST 2010 / 22ND SRAVANA 1932 RP.No. 46 of 2009(V) -------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.1656/2003 Dated 09/04/2008 ............................ REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER: ------------------------------------------------------- KERALA TAXTILE AND GARMENTS DEALERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION, REG.NO.ER.677/96, KKN BUILDINGS, BROADWAY, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-682031, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY. BY ADV. SRI.K.JAJU BABU SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI SRI.BRIJESH MOHAN RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS: --------------------------------------------- 1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION, KRISHI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI-110 001. 2. THE TEXTILE COMMISSIONER, POST BOX NO.11500, MUMBAI-400020. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE CONTROLLER OF LEGAL METROLOGY, VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. V-STAR CREATIONS PVT. LTD., LFC ROAD, KALOOR, KOCHI-17. RP.No. 46 of 2009(V) 6. K.VAIDYANATHAN, SENIOR MANAGER, V-STAR CREATIONS PVT. LTD., LFC ROAD, KALOOR, KOCHI-17. ADV. SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASST.SOLICITOR FOR R1 SMT.D.P.RENU,CGC, THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/08/2010, ALONG WITH RP NO.173 OF 2009 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sou. M.N. KRISHNAN & K.T. SANKARAN, JJ -------------------------------------------------- R.P.No.46/09 and R.P.173/09 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of August, 2010 O R D E R K.T. SANKARAN,J R.P.46/2009 is filed by the writ petitioner in O.P.No.1656/2003, while R.P.No.173/2009 is filed by additional respondents 5 and 6 in that writ petition. 2. Heard learned counsel for the review petitioners and the learned Government Pleader. 3. In the review petitions, various grounds have been raised. On a careful consideration of the grounds raised in the Review Petition, it can be seen they are really in the realm of appeal. It is well settled that a review petition cannot be entertained to rehear a case or to reconsider matters which were already decided on merits. We are of the view that the points raised by the Review Petitioners on the questions of law were considered and decided in the judgment sought to be reviewed. No grounds are made out to review the judgment. Accordingly the review petitions are dismissed. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE. Sou.