IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1409 of 2011 In Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 4189 of 2010 With Interlocutory Application No. 6790 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.1409 of 2011. ====================================================== 1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2. The Secretary – cum – Commissioner, Department of Personnel & Administrative Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna .... .... Respondents / Appellants Versus 1. Sudhir Kumar Tiwary, son of Sri Bharat Tiwary, retired from the post of Addl. Collector, Saraikela Kharsawan, Dist. – Saraikela-Kharsawan, State – Jharkhand at Ranchi, Presently resided near Jagdeo Path, Baily Road, Patna … (Writ petitioner) – Respondent 1st Set 2. The State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi, 3. The Principal Secretary, Dept. of Personnel & Administrative Reforms, Govt. of Jharkhand at Ranchi .... .... Respondents / Respondents 2nd Set. ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellants : Mr. Binay Kumar Pandey, AC to SC 5. For the Respondents : Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 3 19-12-2011 This Appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent is preferred by the appellants State of Bihar and its authority against the order dated 27th July 2011 made by the learned single Judge on review application MJC No. 4189 of 2010. Learned Advocate Mr. Binay Kumar Pandey has Patna High Court LPA No.1409 of 2011 (3) dt.19-12-2011 2 / 2 2 appeared for the appellants State of Bihar and its authority. He admits that against the order dated 19th January 2010 made on the writ petition, the State of Bihar has preferred Letters Patent Appeal No. 1761 of 2011. In view of the challenge to the order in the main writ petition, the present Appeal against the order on review shall not survive. The Appeal and the Interlocutory Application are accordingly disposed of. Dilip. (R.M. Doshit, CJ) (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)