WP(C) 4091/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Both the writ petitions have been heard together having raised t he same issue. I have heard Mr. I. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitione rs as well as Mr. S. Chakraborty, learned counsel representing the respondents N o. 1 and 2. The matter relates to declaration of BA Part-III examination res ults held in 2009. There is no dispute that the petitioners were allowed to appe ar in the said examination by issuing Admit Card etc. by the University Authorit y. However, now it is the stand of the respondent University that although both the petitioners have appeared in the BA Part-III examination, 2009 without the p ermissible limit of 3 chances, but they have appeared in BA Part-II examination beyond the 3 chances available to a candidate. From the materials available on record, it appears that the peti tioners were allowed to appear in the BA Part-II examination by issuing Admit Ca rd etc. Permission was so granted for the examination held in 2010. However, it is the stand of the respondents that the petitioner had appeared in BA Part-II e xamination beyond the permissible limit and consequently their results of BA Par t-III examination have been withheld. Placing reliance on the two decisions of this Court, one is repo rted in 1998 (1) GLT 188 (Archana Goswami Vs. State of Assam & Ors.) and the ano ther unreported judgment and order dated 13.8.2010 passed in WP(C) No. 4101/2001 (Ms. Anindita Banikya Vs. Gauhati University & Ors.), Mr. Choudhury, learned co unsel for the petitioner submits that the University itself having issued the Ad mit Card for the BA Part-II examination and that having allowed the petitioners to appear in the said examination, it is now precluded from raising the plea of the petitioners having appeared in the said examination in excess of the chances . Considering the matter in its entirety and having regard to the fact that the University itself allowed the petitioners to appear in the BA Part -II examination, 2010, which have they also cleared, I am of the considered opin ion that it will be unjust to withhold BA Part-III results. Not only the petitio ners were allowed to appear in BA Part-II examination, 2010, but their results h ave also been declared. Writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondents to decl are the results of BA Part-III examination, 2010 pertaining to the petitioners. Let the entire follow up action be carried out as expeditiously as possible, but at any rate, not later than 30.11.2010.