"^ ADpMteant Petitiosier HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C.No. 333 of 2008 : Hasdeo Mahila Swa Safaayata Samooh, Ward No. 11, Fair Price Shop, Korba (C8EB Kohadiya Thodipara), District Korba (CG) Throu^i Manager, Santosh Kumar Shamia, aged about 38 years, 8/0 Shri Lal Chand Shanna, Tahsil andDistt.Korba(CG). Non-applicanfe Resiiondents VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarfi through the Secretary Departoaent of Food and Civil Supplies, DK8 Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. The Collector, Korba, Distt. Korba (CG). 3. District Food Officer, District Korba (CO). 4. Tahsildar (Nazul), Korba, District Korba (CG). 5. The Mayor (Mahapaur) MuniciiMil Coiporation^ Korba (CG). 6. The President, Tulsi Mahila Eviun Swa Sahaydta Samooh, Fair Price Shop, Korba, District Korba (CG). (ApplicationforrestorationofW.P. (C)No. 1723/2008) (SB: Honrble Mr. Sattah K. Aeniliotefc J.) Present : ShriS.K.Tiwari,AdvocatefortheappUcani Shri Arvind Dubey, Paiiel Lawyer tbr the State. Shri Sourabh Shamia, Advocate forthe respondent No. 5. ORALORDER (Passed oa 15 day ofJanuary, 2089) 1. There is delay of 25 days in filing of application. Notice was issued on 15.10.2008 on application tbr condonation of delay. TKe State/respcmd^it has filed reply statitig fhat fhe petitioner has failed to explain tiiejreasons fbr delay. It is well settled principle that unless each and every day delay is explained, fhe applicationfor condonation ofdelay shouldnot be entertained. 2. Be that as it may, since it is a case whereia the petition was dismissed for want ofprosecution, delay is condoned. Sahu 3.~Leamed counsel appearing for fhe applicant submits fhat tiie counseM^ tihe petitioner could not appear on account of bonafide mistake, thCTefbre, W.P. (C) No. 1723/2008, which was dismissed on 31.07.2008, may be restored to its file. 4. Reasonable and sufficient cause has been shown. W.P. (C) No. 1723/2008 is restored to the original file, subject to payment of cost of Rs. 1000/- by fhe applicant, to the High Court Legal Aid Committee. 5. A copy ofthis order be placed on record oftiie original petiticm and fhe same be listed for hearing. 6. In view ofthe above., application for restoration is allowed. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge I-