IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 21st day of October, 2010 1st Bail application No. 935 of 2010 Order on the bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Mangal Shukla … Applicant Vs State of Uttarakhand … Opposite Party --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arising out of F.I.R. No. 156 of 2010 Under Sections 392 and 411 of I.P.C. Police Station Jaspur District Udham Singh Nagar By the court Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Sri Arvind Vashisth, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Amit Bhatt, learned Addl. G.A. for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the recovered money shown from his possession, was his own money. He further argued that the applicant is a supplier of artificial jewelry and had gone to Jaspur to collect the money from the market/shops and later on, he was arrested by the police along with said money, which was shown to be recovered from his possession. He has further submitted that he has been falsely implicated in the said case and he is in jail since 31.08.2010. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the papers available on record and without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 21.10.2010 ASWAL