IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 463 of 2010 Date of Decision: March 23, 2010 M/s Dudhadhari Exports Pvt. Ltd. …Petitioner Versus Gurdev Singh and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present: Mr. Harsh Bunger, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.S. Ghuman, Advocate, for respondent No.1. S.D. Anand, J. (Oral) The petition is disposed of, on consensual basis, with directions as under:- 1) It is agreed that both the parties shall appear in person or through a duly authorized attorney before the Sub Registrar, Phagwara, on 30.09.2010 at 10.00 A.M. It is on that date itself that the petitioner – company shall have in its possession a draft for the balance sale consideration which shall be handed over to the respondents at the time of the registration. C.R. No. 463 of 2010 2) In view of vicissitudes, the parties have already undergone and which indicates want of trust in each other, it is further agreed that both the parties shall first report their presence to the Sub Divisional Officer (Civil), Phagwara, at 10.00 AM and it is that officer only who shall record their presence and also record their statements in lieu thereof and forward the parties to the Sub Registrar who sits in the same premises for purposes of registration. 3) If, in any eventuality, 30th September turns out to be or is declared a holiday, the party shall compulsively appear before the Sub Registrar, Phagwara, on the next working day. 4) If the petitioner herein does not have in its possession the draft for the entire balance sale consideration, the amount already paid i.e. Rs.65 lacs shall stand forfeited to the respondents. Likewise, if all the respondents do not appear in person or through their duly authorized attorney on that date, the petitioner shall be entitled to double the amount. 5) It is further agreed that since Mst. Kartari has died in the meantime, the respondents shall be entitled to have her legal representatives around to execute 2 C.R. No. 463 of 2010 the sale deed on her behalf or have their attorney to do the needful. 6) The respondents shall not alienate the property in suit till then. 7) It is further agreed that the order granted by the learned First Appellate Court directing deposit of the sale consideration amount shall be retained in abeyance till then. Disposed of accordingly. March 23, 2010 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 3