IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.138 OF 2006 IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.844 OF 2003 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.2669 OF 2003 Rekha V. Mehta ..Appellant. (Orig.Deft.) Vs. Navinchandra T. Sanghvi ..Respondent. (Orig.Plff.) Mrs.Nitya Sunil Mehta i/b.M/s.Nitya Sunil & Associates for the Appellant. Mr.N.R.Parikh for the Respondent. CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATED: 21ST MARCH, 2006 DATED: 21ST MARCH, 2006 DATED: 21ST MARCH, 2006 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant and the learned counsel for the Respondent. 2. It appears that the parties have mutually settled the entire suit claim as per the compromise dated 17th March, 2006 and the suit has already been decreed. A xerox copy of the same is taken on record. : 2 : 3. In view thereof, the decree stands satisfied. Permissible Court fees be refunded to the Plaintiff in the suit and the Appellant in the Appeal. Appeal stands disposed of accordingly. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.) (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.) (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.)