(Bf BI-. ^' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRFT PETmON N0._l^73/2004 / pEa'moNER Blt:;:'iS'tei >^^ 4x\^V ^^ ;v' ifi' <-y^y ^yy lf>' <• • s' /-^' ^•RESPONDENTS Dr. Maruk Chatterjee, aged 5o years, s/o. Late Shri C.4"- Chatteriee, Assistant Professor, Anatomy, Medical CoUege, Raipur (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of ClThattisgarh, tfarough Secretary, PubUc Healfh and FamUy WeHare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Ralpur. 2. Director, Medical Education, Directorate, Behind Mantralaya Bmlding, Raipiir (C.G.). 3. Deaii, Pt. Jawaliarlal Nehru Medical CoUege, Raipur (C.G,). ^.^" / 0 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2^6/2^7 OF .THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRFT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARY AND/OR ANY OTHER WRn* OF LII<E NATURE. ;p--l ^ •ii'SWi^S^. V-/ PETITIONER RESPONDENTS HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 1973 OF 2004 Dr. Manik Chatterjee Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ petition underArticle 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri N.K. Vyas, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.V. Sridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 8th day of April, 2010) 1. ^h 2. 3. Gowri Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the reliefs sought for in this petition have already been granted by the respondent authorities by order dated 01.05.2008 (Annexure-'A'), thus nothings survives in this petition for adjudication and the petitioner has become infructuous. However, learned counsel submits that some grievance of the petitioner still survives, therefore, the petitioner may be granted liberty to agitate the same, ifsoadvised. If new grievances arise, liberty is not necessary to be granted and so far as the relief sought for in this petition is concerned, the same have already been granted, as aforestated. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, as having become infructuous. ———____ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge