v .^. ~ ;\». HIGHCOURTOFCHHATFISGftRHiBll.ASPUR SirigleBench: H6n'bleShriDili(»Ra6sahebDeshmulth,J. MiscellaneousADDeal{CVNo.25Q008 ARRellant ResBondente (Driver) (Ownerl TuresHMrar Ram Patet, S/o Shri Tririath, ^ged about 30 ygars, residisnt ofvill^ge-Sambalpui^THana Kondagaon/Distt. Bastar(G.G^) Versus 1. Narsingh S/o t-ate Shri Ghasi Rarn, By<;aste-R;aout,R®sidentOfV»llage- KSarihargaon,Thana-Bhanuprate(>pur, Qistt.Kanker(C.G4 2. Dharmehdra Chopda, Son of Shri t Pukl3arajCho!pda,Residentc(FVillage SamBatpyr, Thana Bbanupratappur, Distt.Kanker(G.G.) 3. The;New India tnsyrance QQfnpany LimitKl, Near Ohanlcar Cinama, Jagdalpur,E)istt.Jagciatpur(C.Gji Misceltaneous aDDealunder Section173of theMotorVehicleAct. 1888 ':": Present: Shri R.S. Patel,CQunsei for the Eippellant. ORAL ORDER passed brv 11tt1 of January,2008) Heard on I.A.No.01/2008 which isan apptication under Secstion 5ofLirtiitationActforcondonationofdelayjnfiliiigthisappeal. 2. For the reasons menfioned in the 1-A., Uie delay in filihg this appeal iseondoned. 3. Heard onadmission. 4. The appellarrt is aggneved by the a^ 2007 in Qlaim Case N6A9Q007 passeci by i^itioriat^c^ A^^ ClaimsTribuhal (F^.G^, Kona^gaoR,Bastar(heFeinafterreterBe tO^^^ ^e MAGT^ wheretsy in a^case^ ^ Rs.5000/-tiasbeenawai'cled.; w 'Kw 5. It js not disputed that tte appellant had suffered only a simple injury; Nomedical'evictericiewasadducBd. 6. Having perysed the impygned award, 1 am of tfte considered opmionthathogroundftrsrihahcement^.compensatipnismadeout. Accordingly,theappealbeingdevoidofanymeritisdismissed. ~SSI- JDilipRaosahebDeshmukh Judge tl'l l^ -V;..