rr•^w^ 04^ ^ -Ao'^ HIGH COURT QF CHHAmSGtARH AT BXLASPUR SB : HON»BLBSHRI JUSTICB PRITIMKBR DIWAKBR W.P. 12271 N0. 204272009 PBTITIOWBR Kaaker Roadways, Thix)ugh fhe Maaagmg Part^ier, Preetam Smgh Q^archa, S/o, Late Jogendar Siiig, aged about 59 years, R/o, Civil Lines, Raipur (CG) (Applicant before the R.T.A.) RB8PONDBNTS Versus 1. Regional Traasport Aufhorily, G.E. Road, Opposite Lal Ganga Shoppiag Mall, Raipur (CG) 2. Amarjeet Siagh, S/o. Ranjeet Singh, C/o. MahendraTravels, Rdipiu-, Distt. Raipur (CG) (AppUcant before fhe R.T.A.) WRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLB 227 OP THB CONSTITUTION OP INDIA Aos?earaace: Shri S,K,Bajpai, counsel for fhe petitioner, Shri Aruii Sao, Oovt, Advocate for fhe State/respondent No. 1. ORAL ORDER (24.04.200^ At the outset, Shri Anin Soo, Govt, Advocate for the State/resp, No, 1 submits fhat there is an alteraative reinedy avaUable to the petitioner for approachmg (he State Traasport AppeUate Tribunal. Coiinsel for the petitioner subxaits that at present, post of Prcsidmg ofificer m State Traasport AppeUate Tnbunal is lyiag vacaat. Shri Sao has produced a copy of the order dated 17.4<2009 passed by the State Gk>vermnent regardiag appoiataaient of Shri Ashok Kumar Nioiotikar as the Presidmg OjGGicer ofthe State Traiisport Appellate Tribunal* In vievy of this tact, counsel fbr fhe petitioner wants to wifhdraw tihLe present writ petition wifh Uberty to approach the State Transport Appellate Tribunal by filmg rcvisioxx. AccordiGLgly, the petition is dismissed o^ wifhdrawn wifh liberty as aforesaid. However, it is dirccted that if fhe petitioner files the revision before fhe State Transport Appellate Tribunal the saine shaU be decided expeditiously, ..^ Registry is directed to retiim fhe certi&ed copy ofthe order dated 28.01,2009 passed by fhe Regional Transport Aufhority provided fhat duly attested Xerox copy of fhe saxne is fiimished by the counsel jfor fhe petitioner. prv^?^ 3ud^e