IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No. 4523 of 2011 Date of decision July 25, 2011 Arjun Verma ....... Appellant Versus State Bank of India and another ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Munish Kumar Garg , Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Nitin Kumar , Advocate for the respondents. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner is willing to pay ` 2 lacs. Respondents are directed to receive. The petitioner shall not have any remedy before this Court for an action taken under SARFAESI Act, 2002. The remedy will be by an appeal before the DRT. 2. The intervention sought through the writ petition is declined. The writ petition is dismissed. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE July 25, 2011 archana