IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21147 of 2009 SANJAY SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 07.08.2009 Heard both sides. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. The case reflects commission of dacoity in a rail compartments, four accused persons are named in the F.I.R. Petitioner is not named therein. In course of investigation one of co-accused, Rakesh Pandey was arrested who is said to have made confessional statement. On the basis whereof a looted mobile is said to have been recovered from the house of the petitioner. Learned counsel submits that accused Rakesh Pandey was tenant in his house. He refers to the confessional statement made by the said accused wherein he accepts that he is residing in the house of the petitioner as tenant. Learned counsel referring to the averments made in paragraph 11 states that this is for the first time the petitioner is facing any such criminal prosecution. He has 2 therefore, no criminal antecedent. In the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner namely, Sanjay Singh be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of a sum of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Barh in connection with Athmalgola P.S. Case No. 45/09 subject to the condition that one of the bailor should be his own/close family relatives. Bibhash (Kishore K. Mandal, J. )