1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2811 OF 2010 Shaikh Imran Shaikh Nazir Ahmed .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Sk. A. T. Patel, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri V. H. Dighe, A.G.P. for the Respondents No. 1 to 3. Shri R. S. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Respondent No. 4. Shri S. T. Shelke, Advocate for the Respondents No. 5 and 6. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL, AND N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 30TH MARCH, 2010. ORAL ORDER [Per NARESH H. PATIL, J. ] : . Heard. 2. The petitioner's nomination papers were rejected by the Returning Officer on the ground that, petitioners name is not appearing in the voters list. The election process is already set in 2 motion. No interference is called for in exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is dismissed. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] bsb/Mar.10