1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 85 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1258 OF 2006 Ms. Devyani R. Sabnis ... Review Petitioner Vs. Shri Poorna Prajna Education Centre and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. I.A. Engineer for Review Petitioner. Mr.Vijay Kantharia along with Mr. Ameet Gedam for R. Nos. 1 and 2. Ms. I. Calcuttawala, A.G.P. for R. Nos. 3 and 4. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED: OCTOBER 10, 2006 DATED: OCTOBER 10, 2006 DATED: OCTOBER 10, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The Review Petition is by a teacher. Her contention is that the Respondents are not fixing the Review Petitioner’s pay scale in terms of the recommendations of the 5th Pay Commission and this aspect of the matter has not been dealt with by this court. . In Writ Petition No. 3107 of 2003, the learned Bench of this court has directed that the Petitioner is entitled to pay. If it is the grievance of the review petitioner that she has not been fixed in the correct pay scale, it is open to the review petitioner to file complaint before Respondent No. 3. Respondent No. 3 after hearing the Petitioner 2 and the Management to pass appropriate orders at any rate not latter than eight weeks from the receipt of such representation. Once that be the case, nothing further survives in this petition. Review Petition accorindgly disposed of. (MRS. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (MRS. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (MRS. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)