IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.49796 of 2008 SHEO PUJAN MAHTO … … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … … Opp. Party For the petitioner:Shri Shakeel Ahmad Khan, Sr. Adv. For the State: Shri Dashrath Mehta, APP ----------- 4. 6.1.2009 Heard. It appears that the prayer for bail of the petitioner was dismissed in Cr. Misc. No. 53261 of 2007 along with the prayer of Co-accused Raghun Mahto alias Raghunandan Mahto alias Raghunandan Prasad Singh. It appears that this Court had committed an error in recording a finding that this petitioner Sheo Pujan Mahto and the above noted co-accused Raghun Mahto were also the assailants of the deceased. Having perused the F.I.R, specially that part which assigns the overt act to this petitioner Sheo Pujan Mahto I find that I fell in error in making the record of the fact while dismissing the above noted Cr. Misc. No. 53261 of 2007. The majesty of justice demands that the said order be corrected. It is pointed out by producing a 2 copy of the order passed in Cr. Misc. No. 42159 of 2008 that the above noted co-accused Raghun Mahto alias Raghunandan Mahto alias Raghunandan Prasad Singh has been admitted to bail by rectifying the error committed by me. Regard being bad to the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner Sheo Pujan Mahto be released on his furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in Konch P.S.Case No. 24 of 2004. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)