1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- WRIT RESTORATION No. 37 of 2007 GHUSSA RAM V/S MARWAR GRAMIN BANK & ORS Mr. GIRISH SANKHALA, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 9.5.2007 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The ground given is that the name of the present counsel was not shown in the cause list when the case was listed. Suffice it to say that a look at the file of the writ petition shows that there is no Vakalatnama of the present counsel in the writ petition. Obviously, there was no occasion for his name being shown in the cause list. Then, it was argued that the name of the petitioner was also wrongly shown in the cause list as the petitioner is Ghusa Ram while in the cause list the name shown was Dhussa Ram. In this regard suffice it to say that a look at the file cover does show that thereon the name of the petitioner is shown as Dhussa Ram in Hindi. Not only that in bracket the name in English is shown as Dhussa Ram, and that is the name shown in the cause list. That apart the 2 Vakalatnama filed in the writ petition by the learned counsel filing the writ petition also shows that therein the petitioner's name is described as Dhussa Ram, inasmuch as in it also the name is shown in Hindi and English as Dhussa Ram. Thus, I do not find any sufficient cause for restoration. The restoration application is, therefore, dismissed. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /Sushil/