IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4822 of 2010 BHUNESHWAR RAI SON OF LATE DEO NANDAN RAI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SUMANPUR,P.S.ATHMALGOLA,DISTT.PATNA Versus STATE OF BIHAR For the petitioner : Mr.Niranjan Pd.Singh For the State : Mr.Addl.P.P. ----------- 2/ 10.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide annexure-1. The petitioner is being prosecution in Special Case No. 47 of 2007 registered under the offences of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act. The recovery is 196 Kgs. Of ganja. Submission is that out of nine prosecution witnesses, five witnesses have been examined before the trial court and none of them has supported the prosecution case. It has been submitted that the petitioner was not present at the time of occurrence and he has been falsely implicated. First information report shows that the petitioner was earlier sent to jail in connection with a case of similar offence. The trial is going on and majority of witnesses have been examined. Considering the allegation, I am not inclined to reconsider the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is again rejected. However, the trial court will see that the remaining witnesses are examined as early as possible. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J. )