IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14416 of 2009 1. SHIV YADAV S/o Ramchandra Yadav 2. Ramchandra Yadav, S/o Ksushil Yadav 3. Bhutti Devi, W/o Ram Chandra Yadav All Residents of Village- Jhoua, P.S.- Bhairbsthan, District- Madhubani -----------------Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR -----------------Opposite Party ----------- 2. 31.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. All the three accused are in custody in relation to Jhanjharpur (Bhairabsthan) P.S. Case No. 164/2008 for an offence under Sections 304(B) and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Petitioner no. 1 is the husband, petitioner no. 2 is the father-in-law and petitioner no. 3 is the mother-in-law. Admitted position is that death of the sister of the informant took place within two years of her marriage. Submission of the counsel for the petitioners is that there is a general and omnibus allegation against all. In that view of the matter, petitioners prayer for bail be considered but because of the incident which took place after two years of marriage, the prayer for bail of petitioner no. 1 namely, Shiv Yadav is rejected. Looking at the nature of allegation against the petitioner nos. 2 and 3 i.e., father-in-law and mother-in-law is concerned, let the petitioners, namely, Ramchandra Yadav and Bhutti Devi be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten - 2 - thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M., Jhanjhapur, at Madhubani in connection with Jhanjharpur (Bhairabsthan) P.S. Case No. 164/08 corresponding to G.R. No. 1347/08. P. Kumar (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)