^ 'y^ ^<-^ ^^'.^^ ^^yT'^-'^" ^<"^%>"""' ^ c t^THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. N0^^ /2006 LSft' C INBl.t: PETITIONER Bundi Prasad S/o Shri Sohit, aged about 40 ^ years, S.E.C.L. Employee, R/o village and Post Pandavapara Collieiy, District Korea (C.G.J ^s^s. ius,Blias!»u((G.G.) ^RESPONDENTS :- (1) Union of India, Through-The Principal t^SvSfsu-—rS^^^-^ Secretary of Ministry ofCoal/NewDelhi. (2) Chief General Manager, SouthEastem » Goal fields Limited [SECL] Seepat Road, Bilaspur [C.G.l. ^- (3) Chief General Manager SECL, Baikunthpur, District Korea [C.G.]. y (4) Sub Area Manager, SECL JhilmiU, Sub Area- Pandavapara Colliery, District Korea [C.G.j. PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 /227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA s^ ^Trai?ra', ^^•y'ltf, f^nwR 311^! spl' fg'fe 3is^i *^i<b ^rf?(T ..U.P....'.M^...IM. w". gT^iwiiwgfsg qOTfepfrT t|in?ff •? te^ ifSRsrc ^aTPtmsiI^; 24.4.2006 Shri J.K. Shastri, Advocc^®for the petitioner. Shri 5.K. Beriwat, 5r. F?ane! Counse! takes notics on behaif of i^spondent No.l. - | 6r. N.K. Shuklc, Sr. Acjvoccte with Snri Suni! AAeras, Advoccrte directed to toke notice on t>eha|f of reapondenta No.2 to 4. Heard. I Ths petitioner's case isjthat he wcss appoitiTed on 19.11.1991 as Piecs Rated Worker" (Loader) a^- 1+ie rate of Rs.88.93 paise pec day wi-th Specia! Piece Rated ai'iowance ejf Rs.4.24 pate. TTie petitioner was giyen wages at tiie above rats upto ^1.01,1998 and •rfiereaf'ter his coitegory has been changed from Piece Satecj Worter to Time ftatea' Worker from the montii sf Fsbraar/, 1998. Th^ grisvc!n<% of 1+is petjtioner is that after 1ns change of his category •ti^e respondents sre not providin9 hint ths benefjt of pay protectjon, whe|%as,'as per circular dated 17.2.1995 he is ent>+!ed for thesams and in +h|s rsaard, the petitioner has mads severa! representations to the respon^ienf but they are not paying any heed TO tiie ain-iS. . - . I Learned counsel for ^he petitioner submit+ed •f'hat as per provisions of Se^Tion 33 of |1+)e Industrtai t5isputes Aet attermtive remedy is ayaihbie to tiie pettiorier, but he prsyed that the petitj'or'er moy be directed to make a d^taiied representotion befors regpondent I ' • • • '[^^f^ ^^^irai^r, Qi 3fI^T^ f?:ri?i'3n^r %iiwg n Reshon/- .^7- ^ ^ wfws^nss' 3D^r?z<irw.irf??i —?-- wiferatf •WTCS i{ fezl-'rfqTZR ^7 3TPTO STI^T No.3,_and in turn respond^nt No.3 nwy be directeti to decjde •riie representatlon in accoraonce Hnv'ng hsard ieomed the faets ond cir'cums'hmces ^it+l IdW. . .ounssl for the pnrties and having regsird to of the case, the request mcicie by, counsel for 1+ie petitioner oppears fc be just, fdr ond reosoncbie, ^erefore, tbe petitioner is alipwed to mate a cfetaiied representation to respona'ent No.3 wi'i+iin ten <iays from today and i-n turn respondent No.3 is dir-ecTed ro decide 1tie rejirssenTaTion of the petitioner !R accordonce with iaw wi+hin a perioci of i^iree months from the date of receipt of -rii® reoresentation. Wi1+i the diwctipn af' Cer-tified copy as per resaid, the petition stonds disposed of. uies. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge , [^^fe^ Date.