SOSAPPL 558/2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH D.B. Criminal Misc. [SOS] Application No.558/2010 In D.B. Criminal Appeal No.158/2010 Rameshwar & Anr. Versus State DATE OF ORDER : 07/07/2010 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.S. KOTHARI Mr. S.K. Gupta, for appellants Mr. Rajendra Yadav, P.P. *** Heard learned Counsel for the appellant and the learned Public Prosecutor for the State on the application for suspension of sentence. In the present matter, bail application for suspension moved on behalf of two accused- appellants namely; Munesh & Mukesh have been rejected by this Court. The allegations against the accused-appellants are in relation to ransom. Accused has been convicted u/s.364A IPC along with other offences under the IPC. The contention of learned Counsel is that relevant evidence is of PW-1, PW-9 abductee, PW- 14 & PW-17. According to learned Counsel, none of the above witnesses have stated any role of the accused-appellant. It is also submitted that PW-9 Tulsi Ram has not stated any involvement of the accused in the crime. It is submitted that observations made at Page No.33 of the judgment SOSAPPL 558/2010 [2] are based on no evidence and infact nobody has stated that there was any involvement of the accused. It is submitted that case of the accused-appellant namely; Rameshwar may be on the footings of Munesh & Mukesh. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions. After having carefully considering the submissions and on perusal of the statements of witnesses referred to above and also the statement of abductee PW-9 Tulsi Ram. In the facts & circumstances of the case and also taking into consideration the fact that no specific role has been assigned to the accused-appellant namely; Dinesh @ Pillu, therefore, without commenting on merits and demerits of the case, we are of the opinion that during pendency of appeal, the sentence awarded to the accused- appellant No.2 Dinesh @ Pillu should be suspended. Accordingly, application is allowed and the sentence awarded by the trial Court to the accused-appellant No.2 Dinesh @ Pillu S/o Sh.Dhansi Ram vide judgment dt.27/09/2008 in Sessions Case No.19/2007 shall remain suspended during pendency of appeal and he shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sureties SOSAPPL 558/2010 [3] in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court to appear before this Court on 09/08/2010 and as and when he is called upon to do so. Application for suspension of sentence of accused-appellant No.1 Rameshwar S/o Sh.Dhansi Ram is hereby rejected. [S.S.KOTHARI], J. [SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK],J. FRBOHRA558SOSAPPL2010 7-7.doc