IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 03rd DAY OF AUGUST, 2011 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE ICSREEDHAR RAO WRIT PETITION Nos, 72654266/2011 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN p nt i’iurvarniua., W/o Naraian ppa Aged about 65 years, P/at Adavigoilvarahalk Village kasha Hobli. Chk kbpllapur TaNk mid District Suit. Kudhamma, A1/o Mlarippa Aged about 70 ems, P/at Adavigollvaiahaih Village hasba Hobll, Chiekhaflapur Taluk mid Disinet. PETITION ERS (By Sn./Smt .H.R. VASIJDIIA & B B. UMEST1(IIANPRA (:rOWDA, Advocates) AND State of ‘T uataka Represented hi its C bief Secretary. Vidhana Saud ha nangak re SoO 00 T e Dep it C mmi siooei Chickabaflapur District, Chiekaballapur 3 The Tahsildai, Chiekballapur Taluk Chickballapur. . . RESPONDENTS ( iSn/S II CASE) 3, 2— These Writ PetitIons are filed under Articles 226 it 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the unpugnexl order dated 29.]. 201 1 aide. Annexure — I) pasred by the Civil Judgn. (Sr Dn4 sad CJM, Chiekballapur in unregistered FdA Ne25/20 10. Siiorv the Xerox c.opy of the j udgemerit. and decree in the proceedings of Ex..P2 by tal.cing tn.to consideration all these im.portant aspects, the learned appellrte juoge ought to have dismissed the application l/ 1 Pr condonation of delay. The impugned oider has been passed without considering the merits of case and on this ground also., the impugned order is ifiegal and liable, to be quashed. The impugned orders are othenvise opposed to law, facts, probabilities and equities in the case. These Writ Petitions coining on for orders on this d.ay the court made: the t.oliowrng order. ORDER Ten days time granted to comply with the office ohjeetioris, faihng which the Petitions shall stand disnussed for non prosecution without reference to the Bench, Sd/ - .JUDCE T Bv:AMI . - . CEr.C N By 4, Ia ac liP - .4 . Mv