IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31711 of 2010 1. HARENDRA KUWAR 2. ARUN KUWAR 3. KAMAL KUWAR 4. SHEO JEE KUWAR @ SEHO JEE KUMAR 5. GOPAL KUWAR ------------------------------ PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 26.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that land dispute was there in between the parties. There was free fighting, persons from petitioners’ side also received injuries and none of the injuries to any of the members of the informant party justifies intention to kill as all the injuries are found simple in nature. Theft is ornamental. So there is no recovery of any of the stolen articles and abuse in name of caste is vague without specifying person who really abused in name of informant’s caste. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten 2 thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in Simri P.S. Case No. 88/10, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)