IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.17734 of 2010 KAMLESH MAHTO son of Tarkeshwar Mahto Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 02.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 304 B, 379, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in private security service and in fact on the date of occurrence, he was not present there. He further submits that in the process of taking the deceased to hospital for her treatment, she died. Learned counsel further submits that now the prosecution side has also come to know the real facts and has filed a compromise petition. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. His prayer for bail is rejected. However, he may renew his prayer for bail after three months. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)