IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7526 of 2011 NISSU KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 15.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for making necessary correction in the prayer portion of the bail application. Prayer is allowed. Let the petitioner should make necessary correction in the prayer portion of his application during course of the day. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and as per prosecution case itself, there was some money transaction between the deceased and Arjun Chousariya. It appears from perusal of the impugned order as well as case diary that name of this petitioner came in the confessional statement of co- accused and admittedly, one co-accused, namely Tarkeshwar Prasad has already been granted privilege of bail by another bench of this court. Although learned counsel for the informant tried to convince me by placing some circumstantial evidence to show the complicity of the petitioner in the alleged crime but in my view, the aforesaid materials are not sufficient to keep the petitioner in jail custody, particularly in view that having similar - 2 - allegation, one co-accused has already been released on bail. In the aforesaid circumstances let the petitioner, namely, Nissu Kumar be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Sessions Trial No. 434 of 2010 arising out of Shahpur P.S. Case No. 151 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge (F. T. C. No.-V) Bhojpur,t Ara. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)