MP 1 WP8066_10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8066 OF 2010 Shree Sant Eknath Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited, Eknathnagar ... Petitioner Versus Rajdeep Industrial Products Private Limited ... Respondent Mr. V. G. Peshave for Petitioner. Mr. S. V. Pitre with Mr. Mahesh Subramaniam for Respondent. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. THURSDAY, APRIL 21, 2011 P. C. : Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard by consent. 2. A perusal of the impugned order would reveal that though the learned Trial Judge has reproduced as to what are the defence given by the present petitioner, he has not given any reasons, even for namesake, as to why he finds it necessary to direct the entire amount claimed in the suit to be deposited by the present petitioner / defendant. 3. I find that it would be in the interests of justice if the learned Trial Court reconsiders the issue. The impugned order dated 12th July, 2010 is quashed and set aside. The matter is remitted back to the learned Trial Court for deciding it afresh on the application filed by the present petitioner for grant of leave to defend, in accordance with the observations made hereinabove. The learned Trial Court shall decide the same within a period of six weeks from today. 4. Rule made absolute in the aforesaid terms. (B.R. GAVAI, J)