^^ !^r ^ BEFORE HON'BLE HIGH COXJRT OF GHHATTlSGARH AT BILXSpUR (CG). .,.' Wrlt Petitlon No. ^3<!)Lf/20§3^ Single Bench. Petitloners 1 ^ ^^ ,^%./ ^y ^ ^ <-*'^y ^ 'yy : 1. SMT< SANDHYA SENGXR ^/o shrl Ghan Shyam Sengar aged about 33 years^ Assistant, Teacher Govt»Girls ^rimary School, •^i1lage :- SIRSAKHURD Tah. & Distt. DURG (GG) . 2. GHANSHYAM SINGH .SSNGAR 1 s/o shrl Durga singh Sengar, aged about 43 years, i' Assi stant Teacher l' Govern.ment Middle School J vi lla.ge Kachandur (jevera Sirsa) Tah. & Distt. EXJRG (CG) . 3. DEVI SINGH R^JPUT s/o.shri Hem Singh Rajpat Aged about 37 years^ Assista.nt Teacher Governmefat Primary Sahool^ village - Chlkhli^ Tah. & Distt. §URG (CG) . VSRSUS. 1 • Sfate of Chte.^ti sga^h_ Through - secretary School Educatlon Department Govt.of Chhattisgarh Secretariat, D.K.Bhawan, G.E.Road^ Ralpur (GG) . ^ \ 2. "istrlct Educatlon Officer Eduoation District^ DURG (G.O.) . ^^f/^ oontd,*»2 ^. ^•—f c^ ISTITION UNDB.R ARTICLES 226/227 OP THE Q3NSTITUTION OF TODIX^ HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH /^T BILASPUR SINGLEBENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISHK. AGNIHOTRI. J. WRFT PETTTION N0.1595 OF 2003 Petitioner ^hanshyam Sin9h billiwar \ • versus Respondents State of Chhatt-isgarh oy\d others And WRIT PETTTION (S.) N0. 1304 OF 2003 Petitioners Smt. Sandhya Sengar and others versus Kespondents State'of Chhattisgarh and otiiers Present : Mr. V.6. Tamaskar, counsel for the petitioners AAiss Sunita Jain, Panel lawyer for the State/respondents. OR DER (Passed on this 20th day of December, 2006) 1. Learned counsel appearing for ttie petitioners as also for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of taw involved in the present writ petitions are squareiy covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj vs. Mwiicipal Corporafion, Dwy arnS anothe^ . 2. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of -tiie decision of this Court in the matter of YashwQnt Kumar Bharadwaj'{5\^>r<^, subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B. Ed. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 caid further whether they have been paid two advance increments or not, No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be pbced on the record of the connected •& writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 2006Ca)MPJR-C696 Babb