IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS MONDAY, THE 22ND FEBRUARY 2010 / 3RD PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 5565 of 2010(U) -------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. NITHEESH T.G.AGED 25 YEARS, S/O.GOPALAN,THERUVILUZHATHIL HOUSE, OTHARA EAST P.O., THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA DIST. 2. DIVYAKRISHNAN P., AGED 22 YEARS, THRUVILUZHATHIL HOUSE, OTHARA EAST P.O., THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA DIST. BY ADV. SRI.UNNI. K.K. (EZHUMATTOOR) RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE DY.S.P.,ADOOR, PATHANANTHITTA DIST. 3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ADOOR,PATHANAMTHITTA DIST. 4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ENATHU POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA DIST. 5. VISWAMBARAN, VIKAS BHAVAN, THUVAYOOR SOUTH P.O.,PATHANAMTHITTA DIST. R1 TO R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI P.N. SUKUMARAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. -------------------------------------------------- W.P(C). NO. 5565 OF 2010 U --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd February, 2010 JUDGMENT K.M. Joseph, J. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is as follows: First petitioner is aged 25 and second petitioner is aged about 22years. They were in love for the last several years. They submitted application before the Sub Registrar, Thiruvalla on 4.2.2010. The fifth respondent who is the Ex-Panchayat President belonging to the present ruling political party, with the help of some goondas and with the aid of respondents 2 to 4 attacked the house of the petitioner and other relatives. Fifth respondent is the second petitioner's Uncle. 2. Learned Government Pleader on instructions submits that the parents of the second petitioner filed a complaint and it is stated that having regard to the facts, police will not interfere with the affairs of the petitioners. We record the same and direct that respondents 2 to 4 will not harass the petitioners and WPC.5565/2010 U 2 their family members, unless it is necessary in connection with some offence, in which case investigation can be done in accordance with law. With regard to the prayer for police protection, in view of the present position, we leave it open. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Sd/= K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE Sd/= M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JUDGE kbk. // True Copy // PS to Judge