1 wp3035.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No. 3035 of 2011 Mr. Mahendra Mukund Aurangabadkar ... Petitioner v/s. Mr. Pranesh nandkumar Aurangabadkar ... Respondent Mr. B.G. Vaidya for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Godbole i/b. A.B. Tajane for the respondent. CORAM:- B.R. GAVAI, J DATED :- APRIL 20, 2011. P.C. The petitioner challenges the order dated 25th March, 2011 vide which the learned trial Judge has allowed the application filed by the respondents for issuing summons to the hand writing expert. 2. Shri Vaidya, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submits that without examining the witness, the learned trial Court has allowed the application. 2 wp3035.11.sxw 3. Respondent has already produced on record the opinion of the hand writing expert. In that view of the matter, unless the said hand-writing expert was examined and cross-examined, the veracity of his opinion cannot be considered by the learned trial Court. In that view of the matter, no perversity is noticed in the order impugned. Rejected. (B.R. GAVAI, J)