In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 2605 of 2009 Date of decision: May 07, 2009 Amrik Singh .. Petitioner Vs. Jarnail Singh and another .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N. Jindal, J The trial court vide its order dated 6.1.2009, allowed the application of the plaintiff-respondent (herein referred as 'the plaintiff') under Order 1 Rule 10 read with Order 6 Rule 17 CPC. Earlier the plaintiff had filed a suit against Amrik Singh for declaration claiming his ownership and possession over the property measuring 6 kanals 13 marlas. However, during the pendency of the suit, Amrik Singh vide sale deed No.12009 dated 17.3.2008, sold the same in favour of the defendant No.2. Now with the change of circumstances, the plaintiff wants to add Ravinder Pal Singh being necessary party and also wanted to challenge the sale deed executed by Amrik Singh in favour of Ravinder Pal Singh. The trial court allowed the petition. In the given circumstances of the Ravinder Pal Singh is a necessary party since sale deed came into existence during the pendency of the suit, therefore, in order to avoid the multiplicity of the litigation, it would be appropriate to add the said plea by way of amendment in the plaint. Resultantly, no grounds to interfere. Dismissed. May 07, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge