IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7787 of 2010 UMESH SHARMA SON OF RAMADHAR SHARMA, R/O VILLAGE MAGHI, P.S. MAHARAJGANJ, DISTRICT SIWAN. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.3.2010. Heard Mr. Naresh Dikshit, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is in custody in connection with Maharajganj P.S. Case No.89 of 2009 for the offence under Section 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner, while pressing the bail petition, submits that the petitioner, who is elder brother of husband of the deceased, is living separately and since he is elder brother, he has been made accused in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that wife of this petitioner has been granted anticipatory bail by the court below. He has referred Annexure-2 to the petition. From Annexure-2, it appears that while granting anticipatory bail, the court below had considered the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that postmortem report - 2 - N.H./ does not indicate any assault on the victim. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that husband of the deceased is already in jail. The petitioner is in custody since 29.7.2009. Let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Siwan in Maharajganj P.S. Case No.89 of 2009. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)