IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 18TH AUGUST 2011 / 27TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 22440 of 2011(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. SREEKUMAR.K.V., AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.VASUDEVAN.K., VAISAKH, FOREST COMPLEX ROAD, S.H.MOUNT.P.O., KOTTAYAM-6. 2. BIBIN JOHN, AGED 21 YEARS, S/O.LALICHEN P.JOHN, PEELIYANIKKAL, KANGAZHA.P.O., PARUTHIMOODU, KOTTAYAM. 3. CHINTU BOUSALLY, AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.P.M.BOUSALLY, PUTHUMANNIL HOUSE, MUTHOOR.P.O., THIRUVALLA. PIN-689 107. 4. KEVIN ELIAS THOMAS, AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.THOMAS CHIRAYIL, KARAKKATHI HOUSE, MULOOSSERY.P.O., KOTAYAM, PIN-686 041. BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH CHAKYAT RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (CUSAT), REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, THRIKKAKKARA.P.O., KOCHI-22. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, THRIKKAKKARA.P.O., KOCHI-22. ADV. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAI,SC,CUSAT FOR R1&2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.22440/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE MARKLIST OF 1ST PETITIONER. EXT.P1(a): TRUE COPY OF THE MARK LIST OF 2ND PETITIONER. EXT.P1(b): TRUE COPY OF THE MARK LIST OF 3RD PETITIONER. EXT.P1(c): TRUE COPY OF THE MARK LIST OF 4TH PETITIONER. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE FEES RECEIPT OF THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2(a): TRUE COPY OF THE FEES RECEIPT OF THE PETITIONER. EXT.P3: A TRUE COPY OF THE TIME TABLE OF THE EXAMINATION. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 22440 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 18th day of August, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the results of the 8th semester examination was declared, petitioners failed in some papers. 1st petitioner failed in Security in Computing, Artificial Intelligence and Object Oriented Modelling and Design, 2nd petitioner failed in Artificial Intelligence and Object Oriented Modeling and Design, the 3rd petitioner failed in Artificial Intelligence and Object Oriented Modelling and Design and the 4th petitioner failed in Artificial Intelligence. So also the 1st petitioner failed in Advanced Computer Networks and the 2nd petitioner failed in Distributed Computing in Semester VII. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 6 weeks of production of a WPC No. 22440/11 :2 : copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp