:1: bgp bgp bgp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4555 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.4555 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.4555 OF 2007 IN IN IN INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2632 OF 2007 TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2632 OF 2007 TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2632 OF 2007 WITH WITH WITH NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4557 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.4557 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.4557 OF 2007 IN IN IN INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2631 OF 2007 TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2631 OF 2007 TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2631 OF 2007 WITH WITH WITH NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4558 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.4558 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.4558 OF 2007 IN IN IN INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2630 OF 2007 TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2630 OF 2007 TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2630 OF 2007 WITH WITH WITH NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4560 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.4560 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.4560 OF 2007 IN IN IN INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2629 OF 2007 TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2629 OF 2007 TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2629 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs. M/s.Kanji Moorarji ..Respondent Mr.A.S.Rao for the Appellant. Mr.Atul K.Jasani for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 31ST MARCH, 2008 : 31ST MARCH, 2008 : 31ST MARCH, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By these Notices of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of delay in filing the above Appeals. It appears that the impugned order was received by the Office of the Commissioner of Income Tax on 25th July,2006, thereafter the same was sent to the Panel Counsel for drafting the memo of Appeal on 18th November,2006 and the last date for filing the Appeal was 21st November, 2006, however, the same was filed :2: on 13th November, 2007 i.e. almost a year later. However, the only reason given is that the delay occurred due to non availability of stamp papers. It appears that there is no substance in the reason given for condoning the delay. Under these circumstances, we are not inclined to condone the delay caused in filing the above Appeal. Hence, the Notice of Motion stands dismissed, as no sufficient cause is shown for condoning the delay. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)