IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE 11TH OCTOBER 2011 / 19TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 26556 of 2011(T) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- VINOJ KUMAR.V, T.C 49/705, KNRWA - 73, MEDAMUKKU, MANACAUD.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.BIJU BALAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, TDB OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, TDB OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. BY ADV. SRI. G. BIJU, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 26556/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE MRI SCAN REPORT DATED 14/03/2008. P2: COPY OF THE US SCAN TYRODI REPORT DATED 19/04/2008. P3: COPY OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE DATED 16/04/2008. P4: COPY OF THE ORDER NO.R.O.B.6370/08/MISC.C/EST., DATED 25/08/2008 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P5: COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 19/08/2011 ISSUED BY THE STANDING DISABILITY ASSESSMENT BOARD, GENERAL HOSPITAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. P6: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 05/05/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P7: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 07/06/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No.26556 of 2011-T. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 11th October, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner who is working as a Kazhakam under the respondents seeks the issue of appropriate directions for the consideration and disposal of his request for a change of duties considering his health condition. According to him, he suffers from back ache, hypoceleemia and hypo para-thyroidism and various other ailments. Consequently, he is not in a position to undertake strenuous duties. The petitioner has produced Ext.P5 to evidence his health conditions. Though he has submitted Exts.P6 and P7 representations before the second respondent, no orders have been passed thereon till date. 2. The standing counsel for Travancore Devaswom Board assures that the case of the petitioner shall be considered and appropriate orders would be passed without delay. WP(C).No.26556/2011-T. 2 3. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider the grievances of the petitioner set out in Exts.P6 and P7 in accordance with law, and to pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, (Judge) Kvs/-