Cr.Misc. 33637 M of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. 33637 M of 2009 Date of decision:- 13.1.2010 Amandeep Singh petitioner vs State of Punjab Respondent Present: Mr. Mohd. Yusuf, Advocate. Mr.Arshvinder Singh, DAG, Pb Mr. HS Dhindsa, Advocate. M.M.S.BEDI,J. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered at the instance of Amar Kaur alleging that she was beaten by the petitioner by entering her house. The petition has been opposed by counsel for the complainant alleging that it is the routine for the petitioner to assault the complainant and her family members. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, I am of the opinion that the petitioner had, on an earlier occasion, also entered the house of the complainant and caused injuries to the family members of the complainant. In the present case, all the offences are bailable except for offence u/s 452 IPC. The petitioner has already joined the investigation. Taking into consideration the absence of any specific injury attributed to the petitioner, the petitioner can be granted the concession of pre-arrest bail but in view of his earlier conduct, a condition is required to be imposed upon him that in case he commits the similar offence again, the concession granted to him would be withdrawn. Cr.Misc. 33637 M of 2009 2 In view of the above, the petition is allowed and it is ordered that in case of arrest of the petitioner, he will be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to the following conditions:- 1) The petitioner will join the investigation as and when required by the petitioner. 2) The petitioner will not interfere, in any manner, in the affairs of the family of the complainant and will not threaten or assault the complainant or any of her family members. 3) The petitioner will not tamper with the evidence or hamper the investigation. In case of violation of any of the above said conditions, it will be open to the Police of P.S. Payal to arrest the petitioner. It will also be open to the complainant to seek the cancellation of pre-arrest bail in case of repetition of the offence, of which he is accused of. January 13,2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) TSM JUDGE