•1» '^/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR \ (^^1^1 •Siyiui-JL- Petitioner \>t"^.A-\ ^.<- ^^y/ ^•^^^\U'J '^^ W.P. No. t^-^Q /2005 GHASIYA SINGH THAKUR, S/o Late Shri Sher Singh Thakur aged about 43 years, Occupation - Govt. Service, Assistant Teacher, Resident of village Sarsinwa, Block & Tehsil Bilaigarh, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) -^' VERSUS Respondents (U. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Tribal Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) ^ ^": \ ';^ ^ ,-'^ '.]-^' c^ .-.< ^- €"A" 4. Block Development Education Officer Bilaigarh, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner, Triabal Development, Raipur (C.G.) Smt. Meena Tirkey W/o Shri Manoj Khute,/ R/o Sarsinwa, Block & Teh. Bilaigarh; District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETTTION TTNDFR ARTTFT.FS ^ Qp THE STITUTION OF INDTA FQR ISSTIANr*F APPRQPRI, WRIT. ORDER OR DTRFCTION. HI©HCOURT OF CHHATTIS^ARH AT BILASPUR Slngle Bench^ Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satssh K, Agnlhotri- W. P. No. 1490 of 2005 Petitioner : Qhasiya Singh Thakur Versus ftespondents State of Chhattisgarh & ottiers Shri R.K- Kesharwani, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, beputy Government Advocate for 1+ie State/respondents No. 1, to 3. Shri Sunii Sahu, Advocate for the respondent No< 4, ORDEft (8th Septernber, 2006) 1. The petitioner, who is working as Assistant Teacher in Pre- matric Schedute Caste 6irls Hostel, Sarsisinwa, has been transferred to -riie Tribal Boys Hostel, Charoda, Biock Kasdoj by the impugned order dated 4.3.2005 (Annexure P/5), 2. Learned counset for the petitioner submits that there is no administratiye exigency, as one post is already yacant at the original pSace of posting and as such the impugned order is bad. 3. The contention of the petitioner cannot be countenanced on the ground that the administrative exigency as we!! as public interest has to be seen by the employer i.e. State ^overnment r^— overall, not qua a particular posting. There is no other ground raised by the petitioner, impugning transfer order. 4. In yjew of the foregoing this Court is of the view that there is no merit in this petition, Thus, this writ petition is dismissed, No order as to Costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Subhash