u x ‘ i 16 w ‘ ¥ n F x a: M mAw‘a‘Wmg mum“ .a WW”- mmmw mm wmwm» WE‘W» IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATrISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATI‘ISGARH) W.P. (S) No. &\“\% /2o1o single Bench PETITIONER : D.D. Vaishnav S/o Ram Das Vaishnav Aged about 54 years, R/o Sector 5, Street 41, quarter No. 5 A , Bhilai District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Department of Home Affairs (Police), DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur, Chhattisgarh Director General of Police, Police Headquarters, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Inspector General of Police (Adinistration), Police Headquarters, Rair, Chhattisgarh 4. Inspector General of Police, Durg Range, Durg, Chhattisgarh 5. Superintendent of Police, Durg, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA f , m pu H IGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETiTlON (S) N0. 21 48 of 2010 : D.D.Vaishnav VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chha‘iiisgarh & Others. %'\ F’ETiTiONER Writ Petition Under Articie Under Amcle 226/227 Of The Constitution Of india $3: Hdnibie Shri Satish K. Aqnihom. J. Pfesent: Shri Anumeh Snrivasiava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S. Mocrthy, Dy. Advi Generai with Shri PK. Bhaa‘utt, Pane! Lawyer for the Statefrespandentst oatiER (GRAtJ (Paeaed an 34‘“ day at May, 2m G) ‘t. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the impugned transfer order was passed on 12ft 1/2009 (Annexure P-t). Thereafterg the petitioner preferred a representation before the Direotor General of Poiice on 18/1 ”M2009 (Annexure P—7)i No decision has been taken in the said repreeentation. Thus, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner does not want to contest the matter on merits and he prays that the respondent authorities may be directed to oonsicter and decide the pending representation of the petitioner and pass appropriate order in accordance with law. 2. Shri il/ioorthy, teamed Dy. Advocate General appearing with Shri Bhaduri. teamed Panet Lawyer tor the submits that the pending representation of the‘petitioner shall be considered and decided, in accordance with iaw and on its own merits as early as possible preferabiy within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3. For the reasons mentioned hereinabove, the writ petition is disposed of. However, if the petitioner has not been reiieved pursuant to the impugned transfer order for joining the new place 0t posting, no coercive steps shall be taken against him tili disposal of the petition. Sdl- SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI Judge