© •v IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER: WRIT PETITION iCS) ^o^ J27 2006 ^^ Arun Kumar Vishwakarma,» S/o Shri 3.R. Vishwakarma, t^l oG ..-•"ff<ty Aged about 45 years, Post- Assistant A^;-;:?y>""..^ i.^nV-C ..•••"" Teacher, R/o Sheela Sadan, Shanti ^^5W?^ "^' Nagar Ward, Jagdaipur, Dist Bastar(C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, D.K.S. Btiavan, Raipur, (C.G.) 2. The District Education Officer Jagdalpur, District Bastar,(C.G.) ^,-—--^; ,^.^\ . 1^^^ Tl'^T' 3. The Principal, /^' '^"-^ I 1 ', *t. ^i^"~~~^--s- ,/y '1i a,fK'v' ^Vi v Govt. Multipurpose Higher Secondary School , Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE226/227 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUENCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBTION. CERTIORARI, AND_ANY f. OTHER WRITS, DIRECTIONS OR ORDERS. XI-HC-78 *TTOcTTa»«Trai 3:5^ -^WM<t, Wif{ww, [alttKHy ..v:^^.^/..^^ 3TT^?T qa ch (yit^q <^ET) 3n^rwR-i TOTSlI^TshKlch S^IRR Hf?<r •m^r •Wlfa^TWfcff ^'1WI-rf^RR ^aTf^rrsn^r 21.7-2006 Mr. Atok Dewaag^n, co^uisel Mr. Satish Gupta, De|pu1y aespoiidente, oaadvaace cop^. Heard both the coiinselj Thc mam. grievance o|l petBaon underArtiele 226/22[7 in spite ofpassing fhe B.Ed. stateiaent of marks (Annexur^ being given fhe tienefit oftwo The case of the appoiated oa 7-12-1985 as\ petitioner has passed B.Ed.| fherefore, he is entitted for situated persous DIurendra benefit of tmo advaace 2001 (Am»e?cureP-2) ofibe Perusal of Annexurc teachers who have p^sed for the petitioner. Govt Advocate for the State/ pctftioiier 1964 and fhe teachnrs who after l-3-19ei)> bn their omn( grade inciements. Rerusal o^ issued by the Depuly Courses, shows ttoat fhe correspondeoce course durjn^ is not bemg gwen the benefit[ the petitioner raised ia ttais •nndt of fhe Coastitution ofladia, is IIiat ^amination at his cma. expeases vide P-1) in ttte year 1990-91, he is uot lldvance grade mcBements. is that fhe petitioner was Assisteat Teasfaer. Thereafter, the exaiainatlon at his owa cost and advaace iacreiiients, and sitirilarly Mislua & otheis WCTC ghren fhe as per the oxder dated 19-4- AAtninistrative Tribuaal. dated 26-7-2003 sfaowsthattfae B.Ed. exaauaation before 23-10- |h,ave passed ttie B.Ed. examination expeases shaU be.eatitted for two Aaaexure P-1, statemcBtof marks, Institute of Correspoadence passed B.Ed. exsunination by thesession 1990-91. Ttiepetitioner 1of orier dated 26-7-2003 passed by Wo Kkunar incretnente Stfcte Pl-5 tbB Regjistrar, peqtioiicr P.T.O. ^ XI-HC-78 3n^r?iTR-fi+ (raT3Tl^Tsht( ^ gjt^ <L ^- ^ s> t<l*^TT?»HT^ 3^'^ITqRpr, SlTn'M'IS, fsjdiyy . c^.!p>.S6- WT 200-^ an^STira^; (^fg^sr) S^tTWHfStTW^T -2^ his grievances to respondent today and ia tum, respondeai °tii<<fci'ift:riitin]'fftecA<Ri<-iii< ^Stf^q-gn^r fhe Dcputy Secretaty, Sclio^l Educatton, Bhopal, wheroas, fhe State Admmistratroe Tribubal vide order dated 19-4-2001 (Axuiexure P-2) ordered fbr gr^nt of two iacicments to fhe similaify situated pcrsons. Havii^; heard legmed cjounsd for fhe partjes, laaanpg regard to the facts and circumstance|s ofthe case, •withoutexpressiag any opitdon on fhe laent ofthe cai^e, tbe petitioner is aBowred to aaalse a detailcd representation along ^yith a copy oftius petition rateing atl No.l wlthm a period of 15 d^-s fiom t No.l is directed to Kraiame fhe case ofthe petitioner ia the light of avenneats inade by thc petitioner m fhte writ petition as weU ^s ia the xepresentation also. If xiespondcnt No.l icaches to 1|ie conchision that siautety situated persons liave becn graated fflie benefit of two advance iacreiacnts aad. the petitioner's case is a|lsQ covered &r grant oftwQ advaace mcrements on fhe basis of •Ftovemmenfs oider, thea shaU pass orders within a pedod <rf thn e monfhs fix>m fhe date of receipt of the reprcsentation ofthe petit^oner, in acconlancc wtth law. With fhe directfon afore^aid, ffae petitfon stands disposed of. Partaesare entifled for c|ea-tiGed copy ofthffi order—— Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge P.T.O.