1 WP No.5808/10 Mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5808 OF 2010 Mahiboob Rukmoddin Chaudhary & ors. ... Petitioners versus Khurshid Naseer Ahamed Inamdar & Anr ... Respondents ... Mr. S.S.Inamdar i/b Niranjan Shimpi for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok B. Tajane for respondent CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 18th November 2010 P.C. 1. This petition is directed against an interlocutory order and calls for no interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the impugned order is mandatory order and ought not to have been passed during the pendency of the suit. In the case of Dorab Cawasji Warden Vs. Coomi Sorab Warden & ors. 1990(2) Bom.C.R.614, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that the order of mandatory injunction can be granted even at the interlocutory stage. Therefore, the contention that the mandatory order could not have been passed at interim stage cannot be accepted. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that mandatory injunction could have been issued particularly when the essential facility of a w.c. was sought to be cut off. There is no merit in the writ petition which is hereby rejected summarily. (D.G.KARNIK, J)