IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 24TH JUNE 2011 / 3RD ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 12960 of 2011(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- IGNATIUS GOLDWIN, S/O. MICHEL ANTONY SAMY, AGED 40, HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (MATHEMATICS), TAMIL DIVISION, K.K.M.HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, VANDITHAVALAM, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.C.S.MANILAL SRI.S.NIDHEESH RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHPURAM-695 001. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PALAKKAD-678 001. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD-678 581. 4. THE MANAGER, K.K.M.HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, VANDITHALAVALM, PALAKKAD-678 538. BY GOVT.PLEADER SHRI V.VIJULAL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.(C)No.122960/11 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER GO(P) 10/10/DT.12.1.2010 EXT.P3 : COPY OF THE GO(MS)NO.240/2000/G.EDN. DT.24.7.2000. EXT.P4 : COPY OF THE GOVT.ORDER NO.38479/S1/08/G.EDN. DT.15.1.09. EXT.P5 : COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT.23.11.10. EXT.P6 : COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE LIST OF SCHOOLS FOR UPGRADATION. EXT.P7 : TRUE COPY OF RELEVANT PORTION OF THE BOOKLET ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA. EXT.P8: TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 13.9.10 IN W.P.(C)No.27680/10 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE dsn T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.12960 Of 2011 -------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 24th DAY OF JUNE, 2011 J U D G M E N T The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that orders have been passed by the Government dated 9.5.2011, which is under challenge at the instance of another petitioner before this Court. Therefore the Writ Petition is dismissed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the Government Order by filing another Writ Petition. SD/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn