THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.21522 OF 2006 DATED:27-9-2011 Between: Md. Mohinuddin … Petitioner And The Revenue Divisional Officer Kamareddy, District Nizamabad and another … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.21522 OF 2006 ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioner has questioned the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kamareddy, dt.9.10.2006 in proceedings No.B1/1055/2006, in temporarily cancelling the authorization of the petitioner – fair price shop dealer, pending enquiry. On the allegation that son of the petitioner has collected money from third parties for issuing white ration cards, the impugned order is passed. It is also to be noticed that similar allegations are also made against another dealer by name, Bhagya Lakshmi, and the impugned common order of cancellation of authorizations was passed by the first respondent against said Bhagya Lakshmi and the petitioner herein. When the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Assistant Government Pleader submitted that another dealer – Bhagya Lakshmi, whose authorization was also cancelled along with the authorization of the petitioner by the impugned order, has filed a writ petition No.23702 of 2006 questioning the impugned order and the said writ petition was disposed of by this Court on 14.12.2010 directing the Revenue Divisional Officer to complete the enquiry within eight weeks from the date of receipt the said order. A copy of the order dt.14.12.2010 in W.P. No.23702 of 2006 is placed on record. From a perusal of the order dt.14.12.2010 in W.P. No.23702 of 2006, it is clear that the impugned order was passed by the first respondent against the petitioner therein (Bhagya Lakshmi) and also the petitioner herein, under similar allegations against them. In that view of the matter, the issue raised in this writ petition is covered by the said order of this Court. Following the order of this Court dt.14.12.2010 in W.P. No.23702 of 2006, this writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to complete the enquiry on the allegations made against the petitioner and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The arrangement which exists as on today shall be maintained till appropriate orders are passed by the first respondent after completion of enquiry. No order as to costs. _____________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 27.9.2011 bnr