; ;1 '\ <1 ^ ?<' HIGH COURT OP CHHATnSGARH. BILASPUR W.P. (Sl No.6173/2007 PETITIONBR RESPONDBNTS Jugul Rout, s/o Dhondu, aged about 59 years, r/o viU^e Kachri, P.O./Tahsfl Chuiekhadan, Khau-agarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G) Versas 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Public Works Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. The Finauce Secretary, State of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur (C.G) 3. The Sub Divisioiial Officer, Sub- Division Office, C.G.PWD, PWD Of&ce, Khairagarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OP THE CON8TITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Shri H.S. AhluwaUa, Counsel for fhe petitioner. Shri N.K. Agrawal, Senior Advocate aitd Deputy Advocate General wifh Shri A.S. Kachhwaha, Govt. Advocate for the State/ respondents. ORAL ORDBR (31.10.2007) 8UNIL KUMAR 8INHA. J. Heard. Lcamed counsel for - thc petitioner subinits that a pennanent Gang-raau is to be retired at fhe ag,e of 62 years in acGOrdauce with the Chhattisgwh Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivarshiki-Ayu) Adhiniyam 1967 read wifh Ftuidamental Rules, 56. He also submits fhat the poiut raised has been decided by fhis Court m bateh ofmatters i.e. W.P. No. 108/2005 and m.aay ofher connected matters on 04.01.2007, reported in S007 CQ C.GJLJ, 29 tGovlnd Ss Others vs. State ofC.G. and others) aad fhis inatter is squarely covered by fhat decision, wlu.ch inay be disposed ofon fhe sam.e tenas. -?. \.&1 <3^ W.P.(S)No.6173/2007 Leacaed counsel for fhe State fairly agrees that fhis inatter is covered by fhe said decision. However, he subinits fhat in some niatters fhe State has filed writ appeals. Uiiless some iaterim order is passed, merely on account of filing of the writ appeal, hearing of this writ petition cannot be kept ia abeyauce, when fhe matter is squarely covered by the said judgment. la the result, this petition is allowed. It is disposed of in. tenns of fhe order dated 04.01.2007 passed in W.P. No. 108/2005 aad ofher coimected matters. No order as to cost. SuBU^SmiaKi Judge < fc f"