1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 601 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 601 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 601 OF 2005 IN Bail Application No. 196/2005 The State of Maharashtra ..Applicant. V/s. Santosh Ramsingh ..Respondent. ----- Shri V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP for the Applicant-State. Ms. Sheetal Shah for the Respondent. ----- CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 08,2005. DATED : FEBRUARY 08,2005. DATED : FEBRUARY 08,2005. PC :- PC :- PC :- . Heard learned APP for the applicant and Ms. Sheetal Shah for the respondent. The learned counsel for the respondent has no objection if the observations made in para 4 and 5 of the order dated 27th January, 2005 were to be expunged. In the present application, explanation is offered as to in what circumstances the statement which was made at the time of the hearing of the bail application, was made by the learned APP. It is stated that due to communication gap, incorrect statement was made which was in fact intended to explain the fact in respect of the applicant before the court. In view of the 2 explanation offered and the same being plausible one, observations made in paragraph 4 and 5 are required to be expunged in the interest of justice. . Ordered accordingly. The application is disposed of in the above terms. .....