1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 2521 OF 2003 Pratibha A. Sonawala ...Plaintiff Vs. M/s. G. Amrutlal & Co. ....Defendants ----- Mr.P.G. Lad for Plaintiff. ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 13TH JANUARY, 2010 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Plaintiff. 2. None appears on behalf of the Defendants. In spite of service of writ of summons on the Defendants, none appears on behalf of the Defendants. No appearance has been filed by the Defendants within 10 days from the date of service of the writ of summons. The averments made in the plaint, therefore, are uncontroverted. In view of the provisions of Order XXXVII Rule 2 sub-rule (3), the Plaintiff is entitled for judgment and decree. The suit is, accordingly, decreed in terms of prayer clause 10(a). However, the 2 Defendants shall pay further interest at the rate of 12% p.a. instead of 18% p.a. as demanded by the Plaintiff. 3. Suit is, accordingly, decreed and disposed of. Refund of court fee be paid in accordance with rules. Certified copy is expedited. (V.M. KANADE J.)