IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 98 of 2006 Between: Sri Venkateswara Vocational Junior College, Opp: District Court, Medical College Road, rep. by its Principle, B. Saritha ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner, BC Welfare, Andhra Pradesh, Sankshema Bhavan, Masab Tank, Hyderabad, 2 The DIstrict BC Welfare Guntur, 3 The Asst. BC Welfare Officer, Guntur, Guntur District, .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order, writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not sanctioning balance mess charges of scholarship to the above 7 students from October, 2004 to March 2005 and also fresh applications of 11 students in not sanctioning the scholarships of mess amount for the academic year 2004-05 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the Respondents to sanction balance of mess charges of 7 students and sanction of scholarship to the 11 students for the academic year 2004-05 as per the recommendation of the 2nd respondent dt. 27-9-2004 and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.VISWANATHAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following : ORDER This writ petition has been filed by Sri Venkateswara Vocational Junior College, Guntur assailing the action of the respondents in not sanctioning balance mess charges to seven students from October 2004 to March 2005 and scholarship to 11 students for the academic year 2004-2005. As on this day, 11 students for whom scholarships were stated to have been sanctioned, are not released. This matter is listed under the caption ‘for orders’. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It indicates that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the writ petition. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. __________ 16-07-2008 rkk