^^34- * ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 357/2010 ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED AND ANR .... Plaintiff Through; Ms. Aarshia Behl, Advocate. versus MALLIKAWUN AND ORS. AM, Through: Mr. Neel Mason, Mr. Sankalp Dalai and Ms. Vrinda Sharma, Advocates for D-2,3 and 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT ORDER 0/„ 23.04.2010 TANn. 5170-5171/2010 Plaintiff has no objection to this application. In the circumstances, tlefcndants' no. 3 and 4 are struck off from the array of parties. lANo. 5170-5171/2010 is allowed in above terms. TA No. 5175/2010 By this joint application, the plaintiff and defendant no. 2 requests the court to record the compromise; the terms of which are said out at para 2 (a). An application is supported by the plaintiffs authorized representative's affidavit as well as that of the second defendant's director, who claims to be competent to depose on his behalf. In view of the terms indicated, the court is satisfied that the application has to be accepted. Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified In the interest of justice, lA No. 5175/2010 is hereby allowed. rs ros^ No. 357/2010 The plaintiff submits that the defendant no. 1 may be deleted from the array of parties. In view of the order made today in lA no. 5175/2010, the suit is decreed in terms of para 2 (a) to 2(k) of the said application. The defendant no. 2 has handed-over two cheques, details of which are mentioned in para 2 (e) of lA No. 5175/2010. The suit is, therefore, decreed in above terms. S. RAVINDRA BHAT,J APRIL 23, 2010 'ss'