1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Writ Petition No.118/2010 Ammusha Rahmatullashah Vs. The D.I.G. Prison (East) Nagpur and another. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. N.A. Badar, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr. Kothari, APP for the respondents. CORAM: A.P. LAVANDE & R.C.CHAVAN, JJ. DATE : 31/03/2010. Heard Mr. Badar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Kothari, learned APP for the respondents. By this petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 17.9.2009 refusing furlough leave to the petitioner. The Competent Authority has rejected furlough leave on the ground that when the petitioner was earlier released on furlough in the year 1994, 2000 and 2005 and he had surrendered late by 789 days, 284 days and 1024 days respectively. We do not find any illegality in the impugned order dated 17.9.2009. The convict who chooses not to report back to the prison within the stipulated period is not entitled to any discretionary order from this Court in exercise of writ jurisdiction. We, therefore, find no merit in the petition. Writ petition stands dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE Ambulkar.