IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22029 of 2009 1. JITENDRA RAI @ JITENDRA KUMAR 2. ASHOK RAI @ ASHOK KUMAR 3. UPENDRA RAI 4. CHANDESHWAR RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10.09.2009 Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioners have approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail in a case instituted under diverse sections of the Penal Code including section 307 IPC. On account of a trivial issue, a dispute arose in which the petitioners are said to have assaulted the informant by means of Farsa and Lathi(s). By filing a supplementary affidavit, the injury report has been brought on record. This Court finds therefrom that the injuries have not been opined to be grievous. In fact, the opinion has been reserved. Learned counsel for the petitioners draws attention of the Court to the document placed at Annexure-2 which indicates that both the parties are agnates and goodwill between them has now been restored. Looking to the allegations, the injury allegedly sustained by the informant and the fact that they belong to one family and goodwill between them has now been restored, this Court extends the petitioners the privilege of anticipatory bail. Let the petitioners abovenamed in the event of 2 arrest/surrender within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM, Muzaffarpur in connection with Meenapur P.S.Case No.79/09 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. with further condition that no sooner the charges, if any, are framed, the petitioners shall appear on each date fixed at the trial. In the event of default on two consecutive dates, the court below may consider cancelling the bail bonds of the petitioners. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )