IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 3RD AUGUST 2007 / 12TH SRAVANA 1929 WP(C).No. 23776 of 2007(E) -------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- ELAMPARAMBIL MOIDEENKUTTY, S/O.MOIDEEN, AMAYOOR AMSOM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, P.O. KOPPAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR SRI.R.JAYACHANDRAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PERINTHALMANNA. 2. THE DISTRICT SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT, MALAPPURAM. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, PERUNTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DIST. 4. THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, PERINTHALMANNA, REPRESENTING THE TASK FORCE, PERINTHALMANNA TALUK. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ WP(C) NO. 23776 OF 2007 E ------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of August, 2007 J U D G M E N T The petitioner's grievance in this writ petition is that without properly considering Exts.P1 and P2 petitions for measurement of his properties, the petitioner is likely to be evicted from his properties in question. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. 3. For eviction, certain procedure is prescribed under the Land Conservancy Act, which includes a notice and a hearing. That being so, the petitioner cannot be evicted except after a notice and a hearing. The writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. Sd/- S. SIRI JAGAN, Judge -True Copy- Mbs/ P.A.to Judge. WP(C) NO. :-2-: S.SIRI JAGAN, J ------------------------------------ WP(C) NO. :-3-: W.P.(C) NO. OF 2001 ------------------------------------ J U D G M E N T DATED:01-06-2007 WP(C) NO. :-4-: