1 BA 594-2011 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.594 OF 2011 Ahmad Allabaksha Shaikh ..Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.P.G.Sarda i/b. Mr.T.S.Solankar, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr.S.A.Shaikh, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 20TH JULY, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. This is an application for bail by Ahmad Allabaksha Shaikh, accused No.1 in the Sessions Case No.44 of 2010 before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune. His previous Bail Application was disposed of by Order dated 7th December, 2010, since the applicant withdrew his application on being told that the application was not likely to be granted. 2 BA 594-2011 It is the applicant, who led the police to the godown where 873 boxes of automobile spare parts were stored. The learned Counsel for the applicant states that co-accused Vinod Sakala had already been admitted to bail by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune by Order dated 16th October, 2009. He was found to be in possession of three boxes out of those stolen boxes. These three boxes were, in fact, taken by the applicant as per the prosecution case from the said godown & delivered to Vinod Sakala for being sold. Therefore, Sakala's being bailed out will not help the applicant. No case for applicant's being bailed out is made, though the learned Counsel for the applicant vehemently submits that the applicant was not actually found to have participated in dacoity. 3. Bail Application is, therefore, rejected. 3 BA 594-2011 4. The learned Judge may have framed charge against all the accused persons on 12th July, 2011 when the case was fixed and must have fixed up a programme for trial, since the applicant is in jail for about two years now. The learned Trial Judge would expedite hearing and finish the case as early as possible & preferably within a period of six months. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)