IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL REVIEW No 152 of 2007 SHRI CHAMAK LAL SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 19.09.2008 In my view, the review petitioner, who was respondent No 5 was noticed in the writ proceedings and had appeared. He sought time to file counter affidavit but then did not pursue the matter any further before this Court. This Court has not given any finding of fact except held that the entire proceedings from the original stage onwards could vitiate on grounds of no notice having been issued to the landlady, the writ petitioner, which was essential. Thus, in my view, no case for review is made out. If the petitioner is aggrieved in any manner, he has his remedy but this review application is certainly not maintainable and is, accordingly, dismissed. M.E.H./ (Navaniti Prasad Singh)