^^^w^_^ y.fys<3!i-'~ 'v S.B.fSeEwic^Matteri iNTi®MC)i^i^ii[i is %e^eHHS't@s@ftRffiAa' Bl!LASPU (J8BNA'F'BISGARm wsi'y^FEn']^^ EEl'mQNERSi ^ m ^".^y »r ^ '. "••'!>m'w-i^. <'fts>—».:.^-. 1;T:SSI°»' ~'w %i^' 1. ^VtraadraRu^^ iDteannufi^ ygaz§,worlangasWaterilian.Gi^^ Ashram Scliool, Laranga, Block BagK^ia, District Jashpur, CfahEittisgaTh. ^ 2. RaniesliwarRaiit, son of ShatuSain, ^aged aBoiut 31 ye^rs, wOFfeing as ; ;Wat(:hniari,<Sovt.jAshranl8cii@ol, KaiHiarim9.,Block.Bagicha,District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. S^^SuaeNi.BaDi, sc^ofSi^darani, .&^ aJ30ittY28years,woilailgas^^^^^^^"^^^ WEaSstlinan, Govt. Ashram Sehool, PaKi^^BUallian, Block BagiCha, 'BisH'ictJashpur.Glihattisgarh. ^^^SStSsai^SSscm.^SQn^'TaynSa^ aged :: .:%'at3ien^:^^aFS,^w<M'k:ing|as:^;:; ^ElSmigiB^i©Qvf.Ashrain^Sclusal, Msi3| i{^,BlocK®agiGhayBistiriC;t S.; ^i<Ec^iafl;|gain, ^soni o{ Runiia ^agGd^aliEg.ifegg'jye^Fs.'ve^Eiaiag^as! i!:WaBr|aan,^G®v);.%shraffi .l,,'yj|RaH^i^,^lcK;^;Ba^ha,^®istti^;;t, ^>|ee|t^>iiF,;OBiatt3Sgaili^ ^ •^,S!rB$.iRaM|u-^:jg^,|cl^t|.^a!t|F:oP %8iUigSa§<)[S@ofc£|<S8Bt.^aSsB!r||B|:.^^^ .'^11 ^H Itll1- ^.if/SSSR i^ ::ir-BJF; ':^A l^^^"'8^'!'^^^^^"^^ ';"'s •^-sK • sfHi- Sehobt, KariamtoU Gygri, Bloick BagieH.a, BistrictJashpyr, Chhattisgarh. 7. Ravmdra Rain,soirofBhoyoram, aged abouf 28years, working as Cook Govt. AsHrsUh School, Patthakela, Block Bagicha, Distnct Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. y^S. Brymohan Sai, son of'Balrain Rain, aged about 30 years, 'wofking as 'WatiGhinan, Gpvt. Ashram School, Tangarpaiu, Bloek Bagicha, Distriet Jashpur, CKhatdsgarh. 9. Ajanta Ram, son of Navratah Rain, aged about 29 years, •workingas Watermaa, Govt..ffishram Sehool, Tangarpani,Blbck Bagicha, Disttiet JasliptU-, Chhattisgarh; ^10. Eu.(SeeteBai,<laughterofBalrar& Ram Singh, a^d about 30 years, worlang as Cook, Govt. AShram: School, Sardhapat.lBlockBagieiia^ DistrictJashpur,Chhattisgarh. » /<ll. Balrm;iki.mdRam®arrwari,sono£ GiFJan,^ge^a^QHtgtyi^I^°w6rkii^ as Watermaii, Sovt. Ashram Seh<%>l, Gatguda, Block Ba^dia, Bistrict Jaslapur, ehhattisgarii. 12. SCu^MildaKheshh^aa^ Math^usI03fishfa,Bgedal:>otffi>30 •^? ^ars, worKuig)asiCc)®k,(3'ovt. ,>.'a Respondents 13. ^4; A^it-am School, Sendwar, Bloek Bagfeha, Distt'iet Ja.shF»ur, Cl'iUattisgari'i. Ku.Parvati Bai, daughter of Maiifflturain, ageda1:>out25years, woEkmg.as Cook, Govt.Ashraia SchoOl, Laranga, BIock Bagicha, Districf .Jashpur, Chha.ttisgarh. Aiiibhi Rarri, spn of Ghamu Ram, aged about SSyears, working^as Waterinan,^G<)vf.AsUraniSela£>bI, Kamarjiaia, BlockBg^ipha, Distric^ Jashpur, Chliaftisgarh versus -< 1. State^of<3hhattisgaTh,Thrpugh SeGEetg.t^.Ttibal Mel&re ©epaifcEEient, D.K.Si^iswaa:, Kaipi;u-; Ghhattisgarh. >.::12. ;eQa:aait§SK»n^?I^a.l3ffe];fai-e:.;.': r1;.^ DepaEteient.^RaiRMr, CKhatta^aTh. : ^3. Assi.silaai^oiiainissioner, ^ba^ ^ Wel^E&Iifepai'tiaeiit, Jast^n.ir, Chhattilsgarh. ^4. eQyi^Gtor, Jashpur, Distfict Js&liguE,, 5. Bloc^EdHeaaioiiiQffieer.-iBloefc :.:.Ba@i|elia,s|EMsti'i^-<Jias]:ig^ '%Rii:t;EEmsaBianMawgiMiffl-;i^l^ (Iffl'silnUBiBgUsila.1 [ •Bfl IBU '•'•'F'^'.^': ^ 11 ai !S11 y'ss^^ y^\ ^SsSiSj^ 1 Y ^^^ Lsi!^2s HWdl ^KWl ^"^ •<iwf<?i<i, »-ftl'y<re, fadl-y^ ...^..lCS:^:.^.^lllltd?. •T"""^200 sii^n^T (^g^i) an^i ^H ft-li'* '<T®HSVff^ 5r)*it<t) ^nnR ^rfro aT%?i ^i^Nl^ 'RPi^f ^ 1^T3t •rf^K^R ^T^raan^i L. + fSB : Hon'ble Sfari Mantn.dra Mohan Shrivastava, J,1 29.6.2011 Shri C.J. K. Rao along wi Harish Khuntiya, counsel for tl Shri Vinay Pandey, Panel Learned counsel for the issue relating to claim of coni other employees came up for < in W.P. (S) No.2004/11 and examining the claim of the' directed consideration of the o that the case of the petitioner order. |±tShri Akshay Yadav and Shri B.e respective petitioners. Lawyer for the State. petitioners subnuts that the ractual payment to Cook and ;onsideration before this Court batch of petitions and after petitioners, this Court had ise in those cases. He subrmts s are covered by the aforesaid Idamed On the other hand, submits that the representati^ decided after due verification. After going through the in W.P. (S) No.2004/11, it is petitioners are squarely cov^red Therefore, fhe petitioners ai[ direction in the case. counsel for the State )n of the petitioners would be order dated 15.4.2011 passed apparent that the case of the by the aforesaid order. i also entifled to the same Accordingly, it is directe| fresh representation before th^ 1 that if the petitioners make concerned authority, claiming ^-^ \ 1 '"asss"'fj / %--.. !yy ^•"a'-s^"" XI-HC—78 wwtiawrai '5^ "lif4i<ri<l(, yol'y're, fsiMiyy .l^^.^^^^l'1^. ^. sn^i'^?;' ('yf-i'i'itt) sn^v w h-u* 'tf'II SIR^I VKWtl -^ E Tumane s> TBITW :af%a sn^i —2-— payment of ininirauin wag^ ein@lgy^e,,yndpr the Chhatti| Appouriimen^iRules, 2004, fh^ ;accbrdarlGgr'wifffii law, wifhin a | date bf submission of repres| adverse order, the petitioners petition afresh. With fhe aforesaid dir^ disposed of. ^1^ttrl4lH iTW^f ^f 'fe^ •<^T^1'( ^aiRnsn^r ;s applicable to a contract Sgarh Civil Service (Contract p same shaU be disposed of in period of eight weeks from the intation. In the event of any would be at liberty to file writ ction, fhe petition is finally SdA . F Manindra Mohan Shrivastaval •;:"~'- : Judge lil | ""=""""-~-—;L-