IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 3730 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 21.07.2011 Smt. Phoolpati Devi ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. Ravi Kant Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Nehra, DAG, Haryana, for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH J. C.M. No. 9432 of 2011 The petitioner has died. The application has been filed for impleading the LRs of the late petitioner. The prayer is not opposed by the State. The application is supported by an affidavit. The prayer made in the application is allowed. Applicants mentioned in para 2 of the application are impleaded as LRs of the petitioner. The application is, accordingly, disposed of. Civil Writ Petition No. 3730 of 2011 Mr. Nehra has placed before me a short reply filed by the District Education Officer, Sonipat. As per the stand in the reply, the petitioner has expired on 02.03.2011. The petitioner has left behind one son and one daughter. The respondents are not denying that the balance of ` 14,455/-, which is payable to the legal successors of the petitioner and this would be paid on production of succession Civil Writ Petition No. 3730 of 2011 (O&M) -2- certificate. Let the petitioners, now impleaded, appear before the respondents and complete the formalities by showing that they are to succeed their father. The amount may be released to them thereafter. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. July 21, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH) rts JUDGE