BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.l WRIT PETITIO^o. ^ ^?~./2006 PETITIONER ^_4% '.^>-^ ^'2^ur"^r ^^^' ^•yy yyy o<t'" )>..••''' ^ RESPONDENTS / rs.o'^ ., r' (»" ^ •s^ orfSt ^^ •^. . •\.'j u- 4. Smt. Shashikala Moses, wife of« Shri Virendra Kumar Moses, aged about 52 years, presently working Ssposted as Asstteacher, •i- at Priniary School Lak'holigram Dist. Rajnandgaon, R/o Baherabhata, Gandai, Chhuikhadan, Dist Rrajnaandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS The State of Chhattisgarh, r through - fhe Secretary, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Mantralay, Raipur (C.G.) The Director, Public f Instructions, Pension Bada, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) The CoUector, Distt.r Rajnandgaon (ClLhattisgarh) The Dista"ict Education OfEcer, /- Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Ku laxmi Kunjam, Asst Teacher, • Prrmary School, Baherabhata, ii»' Gandai, Chhuikhadan, Distt. Rrajnaandgaon (C.G.) / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA. XI-HC-78 3n^T^irR-<i+ ciqT3t^rgiiiN> ^ .^•.' ^..-> 3:^'-<<i'!ii<i<i, »Tny'i<«,Rioiyy •(TTOHT shMi* • •Wf <VG.- •^6C^?:~^ 200^ 3TT^?TT3^? (^fgp^sr) ??aw:^ffa;n^T Shri Bhaskar Payashi, Shri Satish Gupta, q respondents No.1 So 4, on adv^ Heard. By the instant petition, th| 7-7-2006 whereby the petiti6ne| Lakhoiigram, Rajnandgaon tc] District Rajnandgaon. The main grievance of tl] as Assistant Teacher in the Pril petitioner and her 'nusband ai^ blood pressure Tor abput 12 ^ representation but nothing has Learned counsel Tor circumstances, the petitioner n^ She respondent No-1 and he learned counsel for the responij Having heard learned facts and cireumstances of the on the merit of the case, the| petitioner is just, fair and reasd to make a detailed represents respondent No.1 wlthin a pei respondent No.1 shall decide tf cijiunse! for the petitioner. peputy Govt. Advocate for the State/ |nce copy. qirafwft^ WMf if fei^t Ttezrc ^isrf^rR'a.n^T |e petitioner has chafienged the order dated [• has been transferred from Primary School Primary School Baherabhata, Gandai, )ie petitioner is that the petitioner is working :|nary Schooi Lakhotigram since 1994. The fle suffering from diabetes as weil as high jsars. The petitioner has aiready made a been heard so far. the petitioner submitted that in the |ay be alSowed to make a representation to t>e directed to decide the same, to which fents has no objection. c^unsel for the parties, having regard to the case and without expressing any opinion prayer made by learned counsel for the jnable. Therefore, the petitioner is ailowed t^tion along with a copy of this petition to fiod of 10 days from today and in turn, reoresentation withina period of30 davs tilie P.T.O. t^ XI-HC-78 sn^rw R-<iq> traTsn^rgitfR; •<<s Barve 3^'^IFIRPT, axntt'is, (siMK-iy fTTHCII ShHlctl Hq; 200 3T(^?T q'RT ('^3^8T) CTciTWHlsa'a'n^TT • '-^,- from the date of receipt of th points raised by the petitioner, Wifh the direction afores Gonsequently, IVI.(W.)P. stand disposed of. C.C. as perRules. qiNsT'f^ WRcff if tecfl-^RTRTI: ^isrf^iTsn^r representation, after considering all the accordance with law. id, the petition stands disposed of. slo.3128/2006 and I.A. No.7540/2006 also Sd&w L.C.ilKattGO Juage 1