THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1191 of 2008. Niranjan Singh S/O Sri Yara Singh, Resident of village Gobra, Tahsil Bazpur, district Udham Singh Nagar. … Petitioner. Vs. 1. State of U.P. through Revenue Secretary, Government of U.P. at Lucknow. 2. Divisional Forest Officer Tarai Paschimi Van Prabhag, Ram Nagar, district Nainital. 3. District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar. 4. Assistant Collector 1st Class/Deputy Collector, Tahsil Kashipur, district Udham Singh Nagar. …Respondents. Mr. G.K.Verma, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. N.P.Sah, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Date November 15, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed that the prayer no.1 sought in this petition has become infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that during the pendency of this writ petition, Civil Suit No. 67 of 1994, Jogendra Singh and 33 others Vs. State and another, which was filed for a decree of permanent injunction, has been decreed by judgment and decree dated15-1-1999 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Kashipur, district Udham Singh Nagar and the respondents-defendants have been restrained from interfering in the peaceful possession of the plaintiffs over plot no. 1 of village Gobra, Tehsil Bazpur. The writ petition is rendered infructuous. If the respondents flout the judgment and decree passed by the civil Court, the petitioner would be at liberty to file contempt proceeding against them before the court concerned. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order dated 13-5-1998 is vacated. (B.S.Verma,J.) RCP