IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 7971/2011 Decided on:22.9.2011 _____________________________________________ Lekh Ram Verma and another. …Petitioners. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioners : Mr. Ashwani Pathak, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. K.D. Sood, Advocate for respondent No.4. Mr. Tarlok Chauhan and Dinesh Thakur, Advocates for respondent No.5. Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.6. _____________________________________________________ Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Mr. Ashwani Pathak submits that his clients are satisfied with the directions issued by this Court in CWP No. 8102/2011, titled Bhuri Singh and another versus State of H.P. and others of even date, except 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 that the respondent-society may be directed to discuss the prayers of the petitioners with regard to the issue of replacement of existing fleet of trucks by multi axle trucks in the General House to be convened on 30.9.2011. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent-society to consider the prayer made by the petitioners with regard to issue of replacement of existing fleet of trucks by multi axle trucks by treating it as “agenda item” in the General House meeting to he held on 30.9.2011. However, it is made clear by way of abundant precaution that the petitioners shall make written prayer to the respondent society. 3. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. A copy of this order, duly authenticated by the Court Master, be supplied to the petitioner. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. 22.9.2011 *awasthi*