IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Date: 22.2.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR Writ Petition No.3958 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 V.Rajasekaran ... Petitioner vs. 1. The Executive Officer, Mallasamuthram Town Panchayat, Namakkal District. 2.Kaveri Ammal. 3.Muthusamy, 4.Meyyarasan. ... Respondents Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to take suitable action against the respondents 2 to 4, particularly respondents 3 and 4 based upon the complaint/representation dated 3.1.2011 by the petitioner to the first respondent and consequently forbear the respondents 2 to 4 from illegally exploiting the fishing rights in Kollapatty Saklian Kuttai lake water situated in Mallasamuthram village, Thiruchengodu Taluk, Namakkal District. For Petitioner : D.Shivakumaran For 1st Respondent : Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal, Government Advocate O R D E R Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to take suitable action against the respondents 2 to 4, particularly respondents 3 and 4 based upon the complaint/representation dated 3.1.2011 by the petitioner to the first respondent and consequently forbear the respondents 2 to 4 from illegally exploiting the fishing rights in Kollapatty Saklian Kuttai lake water situated in Mallasamuthram village, Thiruchengodu Taluk, Namakkal District. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal, learned Government Advocate, takes notice on behalf of the first respondent. Considering the nature of order that is to be passed in this writ petition, notice to the respondents 2 to 4 is dispensed with. By consent of both parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 3. Petitioner has given a complaint/representation dated 3.1.2011 to the first respondent stating his grievance. Postal acknowledgment signed on behalf of the first respondent is also filed along with the typeset of papers. Since no action has been taken so far, the writ petition has been filed. 4. Learned Government Advocate states that the first respondent will consider the complaint/representation of the petitioner if it is otherwise in order. 5. Considering the nature of relief sought for in the writ petition and also the submission made by the learned Government Advocate appearing for the first respondent, the first respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the complaint/representation dated 3.1.2011 on its own merits and in accordance with law expeditiously. Before considering the complaint/representation, the first respondent shall issue notice and give sufficient opportunity to the respondents 2 to 4 to submit their case, if any action is contemplated against them. The writ petition is ordered as above. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/ Deputy Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar ts To The Executive Officer, Mallasamuthram Town Panchayat, Namakkal District. 1 cc To Mr.D.Shivakumar, Advocate, SR.12733 Order in W.P.No.3958 of 2011 MS (CO) RH (8.3.11) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/