[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.984 OF 2008 Dinesh Ghogha Maganlal Kanabar ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.D.G.Khamkar advocate appointed for applicant Mr.Rajesh More A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 22, 2008 DATE : SEPTEMBER 22, 2008 DATE : SEPTEMBER 22, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The applicant has preferred this application for bail through jail. The applicant was seeking bail in CR No.27 of 2005 of Bhayander Police Station. The said case is under Sections 489(A), 489(B) and 489(C) of IPC. The said case pertains to Sessions Case No. 270 of 2005 and it is pending before the Sessions Court at Thane. 2. Mr.D.G.Khamkar, who is on the panel of Advocates of High Court Legal Services Committee, has kindly consented to appear on behalf of applicant, hence, Mr.D.G.Khamkar is appointed as advocate to represent the applicant. Heard the [-2-] learned advocate appointed for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 3. The learned APP has tendered report dated 22.9.2008 by the Superintendent of Thane Central Prison, Thane wherein it is stated that the applicant has been granted bail in the above case in Criminal Application No. 5179 of 2008 by the Sessions Court. The said report is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. In view of the above position, this application is disposed of as infructuous. Office to take steps to pay the necessary fees as per rules to Shri.D.G.Khamkar appointed advocate for the applicant. 4. Office to inform this order to the applicant who is in jail. 5. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]