AB 655/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B D AGARWAL Heard Shri N J Das, learned counsel for the petitioner as well a s Shri B S Sinha, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. A lso heard Sri D Talukdar, learned counsel for the prosecutrix, objecting the bai l prayer. Also perused the Case Diary. The FIR was lodged by the victim woman on 24.02.2011, alleging t hat since the date of marriage there was no physical relation in between the hus band and wife. It is also alleged in the FIR that the accused persons misbehaved with the informant and tried to assault her. From the FIR, it is not clear that there is no conjugation of ma rriage for 9 (nine) months. Be that as it may, a witness from the immediate neig hbourhood has given casual statement of not behaving with the informant properly . However, the witness has not spoken about demand of dowry or physical assault. On the other hand, the accused persons were assaulted by the rel atives of the victim woman and a case has also been lodged against them. Having regard to all these aspects, I am of the opinion that cus todial interrogation of the petitioner may not be required. Accordingly, the interim bail granted to the petitioner on 10.03 .2011, is hereby made absolute. The Anticipatory Bail Application accordingly, stands disposed o f.