CRM No.M-4129 of 2011 ::1:: IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 04.03.2011 (1) CRM No.M-4129 of 2011 Varun Saini .. Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .. Respondent (2) CRM No.M-4480 of 2011 Vikas Saini .. Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .. Respondent Present:- Mr. Amrik Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.V.P.S. Sidhu, AA.G., Punjab. * * * * S.S. SARON, J. Heard counsel for the parties parties. This order will dispose of CRM No.M-4129 of 2011 filed by Varun Saini and CRM No.M-4480 of 2011 filed by Vikas Saini. The respective petitioners Varun Saini and Vikas Saini, who are brothers, seek pre-arrest bail in a case registered against them on 18.01.2011 for the offences under Section 452, 427, 506/34 IPC. The FIR, in the case, has been registered on the complaint of Sarabjit Singh who has alleged that on 18.01.2011 at 12.45 p.m., he came home for taking his meals. When he was going inside his CRM No.M-4129 of 2011 ::2:: house after parking his vehicle outside his house, then two young persons with hair-cut, whom he knows since they were coming to the Courts namely Varun Saini and Vikas Saini, started pelting stones at the complainant after entering in his house. The complainant locked the door after entering the room. Glass panes of the house of the complainant were broken. It is alleged that the petitioners were armed with kirch like arms. They had been threatening to kill him (complainant) on his mobile number since last many months. The complainant called his father on his mobile number and complained but he did not advice them. Earlier also, the petitioners had broken the glasses of the safari vehicle on 21.12.2010 when it was parked outside his house. Learned counsel for the petitioners has contended that it is due to certain personal reasons that the complainant has involved the petitioners otherwise, the allegations are false. Learned counsel for the State has submitted that the matter is required to be investigated. However, it is accepted that the petitioners have joined the investigation and their custody is not required for the purposes of investigation. Accordingly, the interim bail granted to Varun Saini on 09.02.2011 and that granted to Vikas Saini on 15.02.2011 are made absolute. The criminal miscellaneous petitions are accordingly disposed of. (S.S. SARON) March 04, 2011 JUDGE sukhpreet