IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No : 1696 of 2008 Between: Kadapakonda Laxma Reddy S/o Sathi Reddy r/o Ayyappanagar, Palocha, Khammam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Director General of Police, Lakdi-ka-pool, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintendent of Police, Khammam 3 The Station House Officer, Paloncha Town Police Station, Paloncha, Khammam District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to pass an order or direction or Writ under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the action of the Second respondent in not permitting the third respondent to depute a police party to execute the Non-bailable warrants in C.C. Nos, 252 and 253 of 2007 (of Polancha Town Police Station) issued by the learned II Additional Judicial Magistrate of Second Class, Kothagudem, against the accused therein, as bad, illegal, arbitrary, unjust and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the second respondent to permit the third respondent to depute a police party to execute the warrants against the accused in both C.C. Nos. 252 and 253 of 2007 on the ﬁle of the learned II Additional Judicial Magistrate of ﬁrst Class, Kothagude, Khammam and pass such other and further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem ﬁt and proper in the circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.C.DAMODAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 1696 of 2008 O R D E R: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is instructed by the petitioner not to press the writ petition and therefore, the same may be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI,J Date: 02-09-2008 KLP