0 0 26# * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1995/2010 o/o BABU RAM versus ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. D.K. Singh, Advocate. THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) & ORS. . .... Respondents CORAM: Through: Mr. Naveen Sharma, APP for the State. HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER 03.06.2010 Crl. M.A. 7669/2010 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Crl. M.C. No. 1995/2010 The Petitioner filed a complaint along with an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. seeking registration of the same. The said application was dismissed. Against the said order, the Petitioner preferred a revision petition which was also dismissed vi de order dated 5th April, 2010, on merits considering the contentions raised by the Petitioner. Aggrieved by the order dated 16th January, 2010 and 5th April, 2010, the Petitioner had earlier filed a CRL.M.C. 199512010 Page 1of2 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. being Crl. M. C. No. 1548/2010. The V said petition was withdrawn by the Petitioner on 12th May, 2010. On the same facts this is yet another petition under Section 482 Cr. P.C. challenging the orders dated 16th January, 2010 and 5th April, 2010. Learned counsel for the Petitioner says that the relevant facts were not argued at the time of hearing of the earlier petition before this Court and the same was simply withdrawn. (JI> In the absence of the affidavit of the erstwhile counsel, I am not inclined to entertain this petition because the issues raised in the present petition were raised earlier also and the petition was withdrawn on lih May, 2010 without any liberty being granted to file a fresh petition. This petition is a clear abuse of the process of law. Dismissed. JUNE 03, 2010 vn CRL.M.C. 199512010 Page 2 of2