IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6030 of 2007 MOHD.MANZAR ALAM son of Abdul Rashid, resident of Sukhasan Tola, PS Barari, District- Katihar. …. Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The District Magistrate, Katihar. 3. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Katihar. 4. The District Education Officer, Katihar. 5. The District Superintendent of Education, Katihar. 6. The Block Education Extension, Officer, Barari, Katihar. 7. The Block Development Officer, Barari, Katihar. 8. Shaukat Tara Wife of Jamaluddin, resident of village- Islampur, PS Barari District- Katihar. 9. Surendra Pandit son of not known, Secretary Panchayat Sewak, Sukhasan Panchayat District- Katihar. 10. Jamshed Alam son of Md. Haroon Rashid. 11. Md. Ziaul Haque son of Md. Jamaluddin. 12. Taufique Ahmad son of Md. Afzal Husain All resident of village- Islampur, PS Barari, District- Katihar. … Respondents. ----------- 2. 27.10.2010 No one appears for the petitioner. Counsel for the State is present. In the opinion of this Court the following relief of the petitioner; “1. I. For issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to cancel the appointment of respondent no. 10, 11 and 12 on the post of Panchayat Assistant Teacher which has been done arbitrary, malafide and against the law prescribed by the State of Bihar and also for a direction to the respondents to appoint the petitioner on the post of Panchayat Assistant Teacher who possesses better qualification and percentage of marks than respondent no. 10, 11 and 12.” 2 is capable of being looked into by the District Teachers Appellate Authority created under 2006 Rules. Since the petitioner has not moved the said Authority, this Court would give liberty to the petitioner to approach the said Authority. In the event, the petitioner would file his complaint as with regard to alleged illegality in the selection and appointment of respondent nos. 10, 11 and 12, the same shall be looked into and decided by the appellate authority strictly in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as respondent nos. 10, 11 and 12. With the aforementioned observations and directions, this writ application is disposed of. kanchan/- ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)