IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 492 OF 2011 SHRI NICOLAU ROSARIO REBELLO ... Petitioner Versus SHRI ANTHONY REBELLO REP. BY ATTORNEY SMT. IRENE REBELLO AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. A. D. Bhobe,advocate for the petitioner. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 12th August, 2011 P.C; By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,the petitioner challenges orders dated 21/6/2011 and 21/7/2011 passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Margao in Regular Civil Suit no.56/ 2006/F by which two applications filed by the petitioner who is defendant no.1 in the suit have been dismissed. Having regard to the findings given in the impugned orders by the learned Judge, I am not inclined to exercise supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution against the impugned orders except to the extent of permitting the petitioner to be represented by an advocate at the time of final arguments. Having regard to the conduct of the petitioner and the record, the interest of justice would be served by permitting the petitioner/defendant no.1 to engage an advocate to address arguments on his behalf in Regular Civil Suit no.56/2006/F. In my opinion, the petitioner is not entitled to other reliefs sought in the two applications, in view of the conduct of the petitioner. In view of the above, the impugned orders except to the extent of permitting the petitioner to be represented by an advocate at the time of final arguments in the suit are maintained. Petitioner to act upon a duly authenticated copy of this order. A. P. LAVANDE, J. ap/-