HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 28th April, 2011 1st Bail Application No. 1081 of 2010 Order on the bail application of the accused. Smt. Nirmala Joshi W/o Late Leeladhar Joshi ……. Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …….. Opposite Party C.B.I. Case No. 6 of 2010 In Case Crime No. R.C.0072 009A 0003 U/S 120-B, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 13 (2) & 13 (1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Shri B.S. Adhikari, the learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Arvind Vashisth, the learned counsel for the respondent. The allegation against the applicant is that she impersonated the owner of the property and executed a sale deed in favour of the purchaser. The purchaser, thereafter, took a loan on the basis of the sale deed from the Bank of Baroda and withdrew the amount through an account which was introduced by Ankur Gupta. The learned counsel for the applicant further stated that the purchaser who had taken a loan and who was arrested had already been enlarged on bail by an order of the Court dated 16th March, 2011 in 1st Bail Application No.7 of 2011. In view of the aforesaid, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant be enlarged on bail in C.B.I. Case No. 6 of 2010, in Case Crime No. R.C.0072 009A 0003, U/S 120-B, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 13 (2) & 13 (1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 28.04.2011 Shiv