1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4943 OF 2009 Mrs. Suhasini Bhalekar & 3 ors. ... Petitioners v/s M/s.A.Estate Private Ltd. & 2 ors. ... Respondents Mr.S.S.Kanetkar for the petitioners. Mr.S.B.Prabhavalkar for the respondent No.1. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 8TH JUNE, 2009 P. C.: 1 The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed on 12.5.2009 by the City Civil Court clarifying its earlier order passed in Notice of Motion Nos.2810 of 2007, 2811 of 2007, 2812 of 2007 in Stamp Nos.1819 of 2007, 1820 of 2007 and 1821 of 2007. This clarification was necessary in view of the order passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court on 8.4.2009. The City Civil Court has granted notices of motion in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Prayer clause (b) is for appointment of the Court Receiver. In the earlier order of which clarification was sought, the City Civil Court had observed that ad-interim relief would be granted for the appointment of the Court Receiver although it had already granted prayer clauses (a) and (b). 2 2 The City Civil Court has now clarified its earlier order inasmuch as prayer clauses (a) and (b) have been granted in the notices of motion and further directions have been issued to the Court Receiver to take possession of the flats of the defendants i.e. the petitioners herein with prior notice to them stipulating the reasonable time. 3 Writ petition rejected. 4 The petitioner seeks a stay of this order in order to obtain alternative accommodation. In my view, there is no need to grant the stay. .....