IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.669 of 2008 KRISHNA KANT LAL DAS, SON OF LATE SADANAND DAS, SUPPLY INSPECTOR, MOTIHARI TOWN, DISTT. EAST CHAMPARAN, MOTIHARI, PERMANENT RESIDENT OFVILLATE SHERPUR, P.S. SAKATPUR, DARBHANGA. …PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH VIGILANCE …OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 03. 10.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the Vigilance. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 15.05.2008, passed by learned Special Judge, Vigilance, Patna in Special Case No.06 of 2006. By the said order the application preferred by the petitioner under section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been considered and rejected. The case is based on a trap which was conducted by the Vigilance. Petitioner was found to have accepted a sum of Rs.4000/- which was recovered from his possession during the trap. Learned counsel for the petitioner while assailing the order impugned submits that the District Magistrate prior to filing of the case has made an enquiry in which the petitioner was not found to have demanded and received any gratification. Learned trial court, on a consideration of the entire matter, has found and recorded in the impugned order that there is sufficient evidence on record justifying framing of charge(s) under diverse sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The 2 claim of the petitioner, if raised, shall be considered during trial. On the said ground, the petitioner has rightly been denied the relief prayed for in the court below. This Court does not find any illegality in the order meriting interference. The application is accordingly dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )