IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.10822 OF 2010 ============================================ Bihar Rajya Prathmic Shikshak Sangh & anr- Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors - Respondents ============================================ Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Dinu Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Lalit Kishore, AAG3 ============================================= CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 3. 23.9.2010. Heard learned Advocates. The petitioners Bihar Rajya Prathmic Shikshak Sangh and its Vice President have filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to challenge the constitutional validity of the ‘notification’ dated 4th January 2010 addressed by the Director, Primary Education to all the District Education Officers in respect of the promotion to the post of Headmasters. The document in question is an internal communication. It cannot be raised to the pedestal of enactment or the statutory rules. In our opinion, challenge to communication is misconceived. In above view of the matter, the learned Advocate 2 for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition. Leave is granted. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. It is clarified that any individual or group of individuals aggrieved by any order made pursuant to the impugned communication or its implementation, shall have liberty to challenge the action/inaction in appropriate proceeding. ahk (R. M. Doshit, CJ) (Jyoti Saran, J)