IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE:: BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI S.R. NAYAK, CJ. PETITIONER RESPQNDENTS WRIT PETITION No. 2241 OF 1990 Khem Singh, S/o. Moolchand Singh Aged about 62 years, cultiwitor, R/o. Ward No. 6, Sarangarh, District Raigarh, M.P. Versus 1. Disfrict Judge, Raigarh 2. Civil Judge Class II, Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh 3. Habib Khan, S/o. Gulab Khan, Aged about 75 years. 4. Saheb Khan, S/o. Habib Khan, Aged about 55 years 5. Naseeb Mohammed, S/o. Gulab Mohammed, Aged about 41 years. Nos. 3 to 5 residents of Ward No.7 Sarangarh. Tahsil Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh, M.P. Present: Mrs. Hamida Siddiqui, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Amrito Das, learned counsel for the respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on 8th December 2005) Heard. What arises for decision-making in thiswrit petjtion under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is whether the judgment- debtor has satisfied the decree secured by the petitioner/plajntiff. The execution Court as well as the Appeltate Court have recorded —^— a concurrent finding of fact that the decree is fully satisfied by Uie judgment-debtor. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned, order, 1 am of the considered opinion that the finding recorded by botii the Courts below are based on substantial materials and evidence. There is no merit in this writ petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed, however, with no order as to costs. Sd/- Chief Justice ^y^),^A