IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Cr.Misc. 26925 M of 2008 DATE OF DECISION :21.1.2009 Surjit Singh and another ......PETITIONER VERSUS State of Punjab and another ......RESPONDENTS PRESENT: Mr. PS Bhangul, Advocate Ms.Rajni Gupta, DAG, Pb. Mr. HS Tuli, Advocate M.M.S.BEDI,J. Pursuant to the interim order, the petitioners have already put in appearance before the trial court. Charges have also been framed. Learned counsel for the complainant has opposed the petition. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Since the petitioners have already appeared before the trial court to face trial in accordance with law pursuant to the interim order and there are arguable legal and factual points to be determined during trial, without expression of any opinion on merits of the case regarding the said disputed questions, lest it should prejudice the right of the petitioners , this petition is allowed and interim order dated 20.10.2008 is hereby confirmed subject to the condition that the petitioners will continue to appear before the trial Court and will not absent themselves without any sufficient cause. In case of violation of any of the above conditions, it will be open to the trial court to cancel the bail bonds. January 21 ,2006 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE