m ^[l IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, CHHATTISTGARH at BILASPUR. »Sfl! WRIT PETITIONNO^^T2/2006. '.IKQf, ? R?MS iraya.a; Ci-S'iiS PETITIONER ^^ ..'•••'^':^^"~ ..•""".^y ^•yy T. Ramulu S/o Late Shri. T.Appanna Aged around 60 years, Ex. BSP employee. Residing at: Behind MVN Rao Telugu Schopl, Krantmagar, Zone - III, Khursipar, BHILAI - 490001 Tehsil and Dist. : Durg (CG). RESPONDENTS tW 4»fcl 'iSK'^^..^^-.-'-,• ^ir^ "'^S^.^^^-^P "•^EBsas'iy'' VERSUS "ollls^Sfe ir5Sr'J ^'3, Unionoflndia, Through: The Secretary, Ministry of Steel and Mines, Govemment of India, 192-UdyogBhawan, NEW DELHI-110011. The Managing Director (SAIL), Bhilai Steel Plant, Ispat Bhawan, BHILAI - 490001 District: Durg (CG). The Dy. General Manager, Steel Sterling Shop, Bhilai Steel Plant, BHILAI-490001 District: Dure (CG} WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTjCLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE ORDER AND DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARY, MANDAMUS ETC. iiiwi yn<» \(w:i"<<i<|iCT«t,t»-o1wi<6,1<ini'(ilj'{ ^ ^^,'\7^^/0^ ^F^200 3II^wqsRP ('iplgi'a) aiAnwR-li* g«ltail^»Iri>^i* g'WIW'HRd 3Trt»I !cpralc»^ai*i(»irt)i*^r'(^*-<£ltIvi^R * ^srf^^sn^T 17-4-2006 Shri B.P. Rao, Cousnel for tfie petiUoner. Shri S.K. Beriwal, Sr. PaneljLawyer for the Union of India. Shri P. Dhwakar, Sr.Adv. wjithKy. PoojaShrivastava, Adv. arealso present in Court. Copy-ofthe peti(ion with annexures be supplied to them iK '. ' .} • ' for respondentsNo. 2 and 3. | Applicatipn f6r urgent hearirlg is atlowed. Heard. I Leamed counsel for the p^tihoner submits that for ttie present the (^ a representation before the concemed Irepresentetion is macfe, the same shall be considered and decided. | Counsel for the Union of Incjia does not oppose the prayer. Having eonsidered and vi| wit expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, in Uie opinioti of this Court, ends <rf jusUce will be served if a direction is given |o the petitioner to make a detailed representetion raising his grievaitces before the competent authority of respondents along wtth a copy of|the pedtion and thts prder and pn such petitioner may be directed to makj competent authorities and if such representation being flled, the cj possible, It is made clear that if a] ampetent authority of the respondents shall decidethe sameon itsown ilieritsin accordance with law as early as ly grievance stifl remains, the petitioner may avail the remedy available un<|er the law. With the aforesaid observa^ons, this petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules.l —r Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge SP/FS/2005-20,000 .•^