IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 8TH MARCH 2011 / 17TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 6165 of 2011(U) -------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- C.ARUMUGHAN ASSARY, (CHARGE MAN, K.S.R.T.C., CENTRAL WORKS, PAPPANAMCODE, RETIRED ON 30/11/2008), KOTTUKONATH VEEDU, KODANGAVILA P.O., ARALUMOODU (VIA), NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS. SRI.K.P.RAJEEVAN SMT.T.VIMALA RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 023. BY ADV. SRI.V.V.NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR, SC., K.S.R.T.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO.6165 OF 2011 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of March, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner is a retiree from the service of the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation (for short 'the Corporation'). He retired from its service on 30.11.2008. While he was in service, he had availed leave on various dates after submitting leave applications. Certain leave applications were sanctioned only belatedly. The grievance of the petitioner is that the benefits due to him on account of such sanctioning of leave applications are yet to be disbursed to him. To redress the grievance, the petitioner has submitted Ext.P2 representation before the respondent. This Writ Petition has been filed on being aggrieved by the delay in the matter of disposal of the same. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent. Ext.P2 dated 10.1.2011 is the representation submitted by the petitioner for getting redressal of the aforesaid grievance. It is still pending. In the said circumstances, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the W.P.(C) NO.6165/2011 2 respondent to consider Ext.P2, if received and pending consideration, and pass orders thereon, expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Needless to say that in case the leave applications submitted by the petitioner were sanctioned, the benefits to which the petitioner is entitled, shall be disbursed to him based on such decision, expeditiously. (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) spc W.P.(C) NO.6165/2011 3 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. JUDGMENT September, 2010 W.P.(C) NO.6165/2011 4