IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 14TH AUGUST 2008 / 23RD SRAVANA 1930 RP.No. 324 of 2008(M) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.34988/2007 Dated 07/12/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER: ----------------------------------------------------- PRISCA JOSEPH (MINOR), CHITTILAPPILLY HOUSE, THAIKKATTUSSERY, OLLUR, TRICHUR, REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER C.A.JOSEPH. BY ADV. SRI.JESWIN P.VARGHESE RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS: -------------------------------------------------- 1. THE STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, OLLUR, TRICHUR. BY SRI.R.S.KALKURA, SC, SBT - R1 & R2 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------------------------- R.P. 324/2008 in W.P.(C) 34988 of 2008 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Dated: AUGUST 14, 2008 ORDER In the review petition, the petitioner seeks review of the judgment in W.P.(C) 34988 of 2008. The learned counsel for the petitioner is also making reference to an order passed by the Banking Ombudsman stating that relief similar to what is sought in the writ petition has been granted, However, that is no reason to review the judgment. Be that as it may, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition in order to enable him to approach the Banking Ombudsman and seek identical reliefs. 2. Having considered the above request and also having heard the learned counsel for the respondents, I am inclined to permit the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue the matter before the Banking Ombudsman. R.P. 324/2008 in W.P.(C) 34988 of 2008 2 Accordingly the review petition is allowed and the judgment is recalled. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE mt/-