~& i^-' IN'THB HIQH ISQVSS8S QS ^SSai.eiSVSS &T B3:LASP13R<OH .WRI^ PBEI'EION^IifO. : ^^? OE'200^,.' ABH) ';amlal .Tiwari, son ':'o£ iShri rP»Tiwat^,• a®e3 - abouts^'/O years, t;I'<3]'riaer::'Vanpa3-'.,. '.••.'• ",-;:, resiasBe'.iO^.'Sa.^St'Sgs-Kuiy.ar?'"' - :P.©.,':0'exfena,'Po3.a.:ea''at;afcicin- Si-ieor'lnafcayan^^ ' -: •- ;.::••• ; - • Da-s-t-sie-li g'aajgtB' ehainpa,:{e.6.) 1«.S'lsafee ;:©£^eEfaats-tKtsgarta/'.fi&rough >e®re'l:ary,',:S'&.i:'®s'bBagairteme^at,- . B,eK,S..:::BhawaH,^Raa.pur',:: : .. »3.stnefe.Ratpur, (e.Q. 5 - 2. Tores^ GQnaeEvakoc of ' Po.i?es1iB, • . • Ra^as, .For-est aeparfcroeiafe^:^: :Ba|i«ilr^"(C.S*') • . '.•' w: :"' ' 3.1 ;:E»l;wi;3iE>na3;'•S'eiEesfc: QffKses,: Raifswss,:iO.G.Y feZT PE'I'%3:Q:N :''yE8ERiiai§3?aiiSK^!',a%S^®2'7^^1.®HS. ii W:S3ffls!WSiS^9W9ii9SVSSSomS^s'5itl^s^«SEWis 'ssiSS^S^WWWl^8^/'iaffS'SSsK:'SS:WS;^3iESsSfS: f.SSSSSGSSSSK-SSSS&SSWS'.SlSS&KeK^QSSBSS.f J(\ iVil :^ ra i PET3 '-f-^: /^ ^£W^^ ^i^''v^sr ,-i> ^^' ^iii^^" : Ki •.^'a8ati?tBt' XI-HC-22 3^'i<|'(i<'i<'i,,afl1wis,fsi<'ii'My 31T^?r 'V^K *fl*<cff Sh*<l<«i /W1 fa'b<81"""""" 2003 sn^isii f<-ii.<* 3iis5f ^f^»flli^ 311^1 WtIIWSfe cb^[^i'4tyf HH^I*^ I^l<ii •if^t^K ^r3lf;OT3II^T 26.08.a003 Sbri RaniakantPaiidey, ^ Shri Ran.bir Siagh, G.AJ pounsel for fhe petitioner. for the State/respondents No.l to3. Shri Anoop Mazuiudar, G)ounsel for respondent No.4. None for respoiulent No.5. Considering fhe lunited petition, on fhe prayer of learujed wifh. the consent of the couas41 stajge inacti(1)n betiefits is disposed of finaUy at this A^ricved wifh the inactiifrn m not paying , post retiral petltioner has approached. appropriate writ direction or olpder to inakc tUc post rctiial bcncfi^ to hini- ^ 7. Asregards conten|l it is respectfulfy subm4ted paid aU fhe aiaount of nature of prayer inade ia this counsel for the petitioner aad for the respondents, fhe niatter :aus on (he part of fhe respondents fhat arc due to tiim, the Court for issuaace of aa commanduig the Authorities :s, which are duc and adraissiblc On notice Iteiiig issued a|returD. has been ffled oiTbehalfof respondents No.t to 3 paragr^ph 7 whereofreads thus: ts ofpara 5.3 offhepetifioii that the petitioner was [pensionary benefits except , [1i^^far^ -s.- .-HC-22 v 311^1 ^iT •f?:IR; 3DS?I ^i^i -Mfia '3'q ';qpTf?FT, ofllyis, (»K'ii'yy OT^T IR^? <4iti?(Ttii*'n«h '^n, 2'oo fa'b<81" an^i TOIW '(te <*l''<I?f-'il-< t114fff'? Fss;) tPn^K . ^t SlPgH 311^51 ttie Accoitutajat thc ainouiit of G.P.F. oA appUcation made by fhereafter he has refusdd processuig his case to respectfuUy subnutted copy of the petition, Territorial Forest Divisy of G.P.F. Fiaal paymen|t fhe petitioner to the flnal payment but the Accountaitt Generall paymcnt caniiot bc wifhout his application| with thc statcmcnt ofwj the pass book was no| thcrcfore thc sanic was a request was made to application for final refused to aigfi fhe subinitted that becausf payinent is pending. submitted fhat as sooit his applicatiQn in the| ap^»Iicatk Eotest saine wffl be processe4 Raipiu- Terrttonal authorization by the Chliattissarh. Froiu the above, it is c] paid other pensioBaiy benefits| onty dispute, wliich now rein^ins G.P.F. accoujit of the fact fhat thc him was impippei^ and to aigsi the applicatioa for Accountant General. It ^ |that after baviag seen the |the D.F.O. of the Raipur ^n Raipur had sent fhe case relating to the accoiiat of General to authQnze ^idc letter dated 25-2-2003, has iofonned that the fitial a^ithorizcd to thc pensioiicr |and the or^inal pass book jthdrawals inadc by hi'm. As no|t available in the Dwision, Ircconstituted aad thcreaflier jthe petttioner to submit his pa^jnient but the petitioner has ap^»Iication. It is respectfuUy of fhis reason, the final It is turther respectfuUy as the petitioner subinits prescribed proforma, tbe fi'oni fhe; ofBce of D.F.0. Division Raipur foi- Accountant General of ;ar that the petitioner has bcen which fact is not disputed. The ains, relates to non-payment of -5- [Tft^ §!<aq XI-iHC-22 iHI^I^ r<;-(i.<* snlsi ^i^T^t-ffl?fl 1-&-* '3?g ".qraiypl, •s^ffHS, facil+iy 3TI^T 'tRRf? ••IttlCTl g^^jq,——••••—""•"• ""^^ 209 ftre^r' sii^t^Rnwofe -3> •miiferaN-wraf•? fyst xfesn ^i 3lf5(CT 311^1 In fhfc above vicw of <lhc inatter and in vicw? of thc stateiaent contaiaed ia paragra|ph that the conceraed Officer ahetll Registered A-cknowledgeinent ad.dress BidicatEd ia> fhe vffrit Eiue p^tition. back tfae conipletEd fonn duly uifoEBiation to the approprial^ Terriforial Forest Division who shbuld take appropriate steps promptily ~ < - actd admissible as per niles (hree months fix>m the date on said D.F.O. 7 of fhe retum, it is directed send the apprppriate fonn by post to fhe petitioner at fhe i. The petitioner sbaU send ^igned aad alongwitb aU relevant Authorily i.e. D. F.0. Raipur tbatl process fhe application aud '. Payment of the ataount due be made wifhin a period of ^hieh the fona-te received by the Withtlieaforesai4.directt<:)n/observatioii,ttiis wnt petition staads disposed of. Consequen^ly, I.A.No.168/2003 alsostands disposcd of. Ccrtificd copy as pcr rulcs P. C. Naik Judge [^^