IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARILAL WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 LA.App..No. 642 of 2011() ------------------------- LAR.52/2000 of II ADDL.SUB COURT,TRIVANDRUM .................... APPELLANT(S): CLAIMANTS ----------------------- 1. G.PANKAJAKSHI, W/O.LATE K.KRISHNAN, AGED 75 YEARS, RESIDING AT THOTTUVARAMPIL VEEDU, T.C.22/371(1), ATTUKAL P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. PANKAJAKSHI SULOCHANA, AGED 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT THOTTUVARAMPIL VEEDU, T.C.22/371(1), ATTUKAL P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. PANKAJAKSHI RAJAMMA, AGED 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT THOTTUVARAMPIL VEEDU, T.C.22/371(1), ATTUKAL P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. SREEKANTAN, S/O.LATE K.KRISHNAN, AGED 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT THOTTUVARAMPIL VEEDU, T.C.22/371(1), ATTUKAL P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. PANKAJAKSHI RENUKA, AGED 43 YEARS, RESIDING AT THOTTUVARAMPIL VEEDU, T.C.22/371(1), ATTUKAL P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6. PANKAJAKSHI USHA, AGED 39 YEARS, RESIDING AT THOTTUVARAMPIL VEEDU, T.C.22/371(1), ATTUKAL P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 7. PANKAJAKSHI ANITHA, AGED 36 YEARS, RESIDING AT THOTTUVARAMPIL VEEDU, T.C.22/371(1), ATTUKAL P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.AYYAPPAN SANKAR RESPONDENT(S)RESPONDENTS: --------------- STATE OF KERALA, (SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, ADDITIONAL L.A.UNIT, VANCHIYOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER C.R.SHYAM KUMAR THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & K. HARILAL, JJ. ------------------------ L.A.A.No. 642 OF 2011 ------------------------ Dated this the 30th day of November, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. The claimants are in appeal. The maintainability of this appeal is questioned by the learned senior Government Pleader, who points out that L.A.A. No.269/2008 preferred by the Government against the impugned award was decided by this court with notice to the claimants/ respondents. 2. We find force in the submissions of the learned Government Pleader. We hold that the appeal is not maintainable. Hence, we reject this appeal. The Registry is directed to refund full court fee remitted on the appeal memorandum. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE K. HARILAL, JUDGE. dpk WPC.No. 2