IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10445 of 2009 1. AMIT KUMAR SINGH, Son of Dinesh Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- Masarhi, P.S.- Gouri Chak, District- Patna (Bihar). 2. Guddu Kumar, Son of Indra Deo Das, Resident of Village- Bangali Bigha, P.S.- Chandauti, District- Gaya (Bihar). 3. Chandan Kumar Ram, Son of Prasidhi Ram, Resident of Village- Panjraon, P.S.- Noan, District- Kaimur (Bhabhua), Bihar. 4. Babulal Ram, Son of Ram Awatar Ram, Resident of Village- Ghorasara, P.S.- Noan, District- Kaimur (Babhua), Bihar. 5. Abhijit Kumar, Son of Om Prakash Divedi. Resident of Village- Durgapur, P.S.- Indrapuri, District- Rohtas (Bihar) :--- Petitioners. Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA through Director General of Police, Indo Tibetan Boarder Police Force, SHQ (Delhi), C.G.O. Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi. 2. The D.I.G., SHQ (Delhi), Indo Tibetan Boarder Police, Block IInd, C.G.O. Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi. 3. The D.I.G., SHQ (NE-II), Indo Tibetan Boarder Police, Below Metro Point, P.O.- Samdur (Todong), Gangtok (East Sikkim). 4. The Commandant, Indo Tibetan Boarder Police, Below Metro Point, P.O.- Samdur (Todong), Gangtok (East Sikkim). 5. Recruitment Board, Indo Tibetan Boarder Police, Mokama Ghat Group Centre, C.R.P.F., Mokama Ghat (Bihar) :--- Respondents. ----------- For the petitioners :- Mr. Dhanendra Choubey, Advocate. For the Union of India :- Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy, C.G.C. ==== 03. 03.11.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. It appears earlier this Court under orders dated 24.8.2009 had granted time until 2nd November, 2009 to the respondent authorities to file their counter affidavit but till date the same has not been filed. Prayer is made on behalf of the Union to further adjourn the matter by two weeks. Such prayer for adjournment is refused in view of the nature of the order which is proposed in the matter. 3. Counsel for the petitioners states that during the pendency of this writ application petitioner nos. 1 and 5 have been served with the appointment letter and have also been permitted to join the post of Constable (General Duty) in the Indo Tibetan Boarder Police Force (hereinafter referred to as “I.T.B.P.”). In the - 2 - circumstances, their application has become infructuous and is, accordingly, disposed of. 4. Petitioner Nos. 2,3 and 4 had participated in the selection test for appointment on the post of Constable (General Duty) in response to the advertisement issued by the authorities of the I.T.B.P. SHQ, Delhi. The selection test was held at Mokama C.R.P.F. Centre within the district of Patna. It s submitted on behalf of Petitioner Nos. 2,3 and 4 that they became successful in the physical/written as also medical test but for reasons best known to the authorities appointment letter is not being issued to them. 5. Let Petitioner Nos. 2,3 and 4 represent before the D.I.G. SHQ (NE-II) I.T.B.P., Respondent no.3 who should consider their representation and issue appointment letter with permission to join the post of Constable (General Duty) or pass a reasoned order indicating as to why they have not been given appointment letter with permission to joint the post of Constable (General Duty), as early as possible, in any case within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order. 6. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha, J.)