WPSB 970/2002 Hon'ble P.C. Verma, J. Heard M.C. Kandpal, learned Sr. Advocate for the petitioners and Sri H.M. Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for the State. Sri M.C. Kandpal, Sr. Advocate does not press the petition on behalf of petitioner no. 1, 3 and 4. Hence, the petition is dismissed as not pressed against the petitioner no. 1, 3, and 4. The grievance of the petitioner no. 2 is that persons junior to him have been promoted ignoring the claim of the petitioner. If the assertion of the petitioner is true then this is clear cut violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is disposed of with the direction that in case any similarly situated person junior to the petitioner no. 2 from the seniority list has been promoted, the petitioner no. 2 shall also be promoted w.e.f. the date his junior has been promoted. (P.C.V.,J.) 3.4.2008 Prabodh