tl'^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR iinaie Bencn Hon'bie Shri DiliD Raosaheb DesnrnyKh, J. Sscond Appeai No.258/2008 Plaintiff Vsrsus Shivram S/o Late Dhaneshwar, Aged about 62 years, R/o Village Purandih, Tahsil Pai, District Surguja (C.G.) Divisional Forest Officer. East Suirguja, District Surguja (C.G.) 2. 3. 5. The Forest Range Officer, Ramanujganj, District Surguja (C.G.) Forestor Shri Sharma, Ramanujganj, Tahsii Pal, District Surguja (C.G.) Rajeshwar Prasad, Forest Guard, Viilage Aaragahi, Tahsil Pal, District Surguja (C.G.) State of Chhatiisgarh, Threugh: Coiiector, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) Second Appeal under Sectjon 100 ofthe Civil Procedure Code. Present: Shri Subhash Yadav, counse! for the appeiiant. Shri G. D. Vaswani, G.A. for the State/respondent No.5. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 23rd day of Juiy, 2008 Heard on admission. •^ (2) The appellant is aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 07-04-2008 passed by the 2nd Addittonal District Judge, (F.T.C.), Ramanujganj, District Surguja in Civil Appea! No..5-A/2006 whereby the judgment and decree dated 1 1-08-2005 passed by the Civi! Judge Class i, Ramanujganj in Civil Suit No.lS-A/2004 dismissina the suit for declaration of title on the basis of adverse possession over government land was (3) The sole ground uraed by learned counsel for the aooellant in this appeai is that both the Courts below have wrongly appreclated the 2- evidence relating to possession over government land. No other ground was urged. (4) Having considered submission of learned counse! for the appeHant, I have perused the impugned judgment and decree. Both the Courts below held that the appellant/plaintiff had miserably failed to prove adverse possession over govemment land. The finding recorded by both the Courts below is a finding of fact. No substantial question of lav»'arises for determination of this appeal which is accordingly dismissed at the stage ofadmission. -'- Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge Fumane