C.W.P. No. 342 of 2009 Ms. Manju Malik v. State of Haryana and others Present: Mr. R.K.Malik, Senior Advocate with Mr.Yash Deep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. *** The petitioner is B.A. (Hons. in Sanskrit) with diploma in teaching Sanskrit Language from Education Department, Haryana. She had applied for the job of a Sanskrit Teacher and as per information under the RTI Act she had obtained 48.48 marks whereas the lowest candidate obtained 53.03 marks. Learned counsel asserts that in an earlier writ petition bearing No. 10926 of 2007 decided on 21.12.2007 certain persons who did not have the essential qualification of Shastri in Sanskrit/B.A.(Hons.in Sanskrit) but had Sanskrit as an elective subject in their Graduation and have a qualification of M.A. in Sanskrit, had been considered by this Court to be eligible. It is on this basis that learned Senior counsel urges that if the marks obtained by the petitioner in the last examination had been added, she would have got the higher claim than the person who had been last selected. On being asked as to whether when merit was included in the earlier writ petition, the marks obtained by such candidate in Graduation were counted or not, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for permission to withdraw this petition with permission to file a fresh one containing all those pleadings. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE January 12, 2009 sunita