HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P. No.20130 of 2002 and C.C. NO:767 of 2007 31.10.2007 W.P. No.20130 of 2002 Between C.M.Kalavathi ..Petitioner AND Chief Engineer, A.P. Transco, Hyderabad and another ..Respondents SUO MOTU C.C. NO:767 OF 2007 IN RE Chief Engineer, A.P. Transco, Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad and another :: JUDGMENT :: HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P. No.20130 of 2002 and C.C. NO:767 of 2007 The learned Standing Counsel for the respondents has informed that the transformer which was initially erected in front of the petitioner’s house located in a residential locality in Secunderabad has since been shifted to another safe location and new transformer was also activated. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner would suggest that the old transformer has not yet been dismantled, it is a mater for the Electricity Board to dismantle the same and put to use elsewhere. When once the transformer has been shifted to another location and the same has been activated simultaneously de- activating the existing transformer, the grievance of the petitioner should be deemed and treated to have been redressed and therefore, the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication. Hence, it is disposed of, but however, without costs. In view of the disposal of the writ petition, the Contempt Case is also not needed to be pursued in any manner since the main objective of securing shift of the transformer to another location has been achieved, the Contempt Notice is also discharged. The Contempt Case is accordingly, disposed of. No costs. _________________________________ NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO.J. 31.10.2007psr