IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 642 OF 2007 MRS. RITA CABRAL, TISWADI-GOA. ... Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF GOA THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY AND 5 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Rohit Bras De Sa, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S. Vahidulla, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent Nos.1, 3, 4 and 5. Coram:- D. B. BHOSALE & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 21st January, 2008 P.C.:- Heard Mr. Rohit Bras De Sa, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. S. Vahidulla, learned Additional Government Advocate for Respondent Nos.1, 3, 4 and 5. At the out-set, Mr. Vahidulla, learned Additional Government Advocate for Respondent Nos.1, 3, 4 and 5 submits that Respondent No.3 shall take action against the illegal construction of Respondent No.6 as per Order dated 18-8-2006 by exercising his powers under Section 66(5) of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 as expeditiously as possible and in any event within six weeks from the date of receipt of this order. His statement is accepted. In view of the statement made by Mr. Vahidulla, learned Additional Government Advocate, Mr. Rohit Bras De Sa, learned Counsel for the Petitioner does not press prayer (A) in the Writ Petition. It is needless to express that the concerned Panchayat is also expected to act in accordance with law. Insofar as prayer (B) in the petition is concerned Mr. Vahidulla, learned Additional Government Advocate submits that Respondent No.3 shall decide the application filed by the Petitioner under Section 178 which is annexed to the Writ Petition at page 39 within four months from today. His statement is accepted. Petition disposed of. D. B. BHOSALE, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.