IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION Nos : 4013 and 4354 of 2007 W.P.No. 4013 of 2007 Between: V.Srinivasulu S/o.Late V.Sunkanna R/o.No.4/1370, K.L.D.Road, Papameta, Ananthapur Rural, Ananthapur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank, rep. by its Chairman, Rayachoti Road, Cuddapah. 2 The General Manager, Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank, Rayachoti Road, Cuddapah. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring all the proceedings including the charge- sheet issued in proceedings No. 1298/PD/CST/2005-06 dated 23.3.2006 by the Respondents as illegal, arbitrary, bad in law, without jurisdiction and also violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents not to proceed further in the departmental enquiry till the Respondents framed Regulations governing the service conditions of the petitioner and pass such other relief or reliefs as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:DR.P.B.VIJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.K.SRINIVASA MURTHY W.P.No : 4354 of 2007 Between: V.Srinivasulu, s/o late V.Sunkanna, r/o No.4/1370, K.L.D.Road, Papameta, Ananthapur Rural, Ananthapur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank, represented by its Chairman, Rayachoti Road, Cuddapah. 2 The General Manager, Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank, Rayachoti Road, Cuddapah. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the all further proceedings including the charge-sheet issued in proceedings no.681/PD/CST/CGS/2005-06 dated 20-10-2005 by the respondents as illegal, arbitrary, bad in law, without jurisdiction and also violative of Art.14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to proceed further in the departmental enquiry till the respondents frame regulations governing the service conditions and pass such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:DR.P.B.VIJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.K.SRINIVASA MURTHY The Court made the following COMMON ORDER: These two Writ Petitions have been filed against the charge sheet that has been made against the writ petitioner. During the pendency of these Writ Petitions, the disciplinary proceedings have reached the stage of finality by way of imposition of punishment of removal from service, which is the subject matter of challenge before this Court in Writ Petition No. 21134 of 2008. It is, therefore, appropriate to leave all questions relating to the validity or otherwise of the charge sheet to be adjudicated in the said Writ Petition. The cause in these two Writ Petitions does not survive for further adjudication and leaving all questions open, these two Writ Petitions are dismissed, but however, without costs. ---------------------------------- (NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J) 17th June 2009 ksld ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RS}