IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5181 of 2011 SAMAR HALDER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 17.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report and in course of investigation, his name surfaced in this case in the confessional statement of co-accused. It appears that except the confessional statement, there is nothing against the petitioner. Even if, the confessional statement assumed to be true, then also, only allegation of conspiracy has been levelled against the petitioner. Moreover, having similar allegation, some co-accused have already been granted privilege of bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 38 of 2010 subject to condition that one of the sureties must be local and holder of landed property. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)