IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.9544 of 2010 1. DINESH SAHU @ SARAL @ DINESH PRASAD @ SARAL 2. Mahesh Prasad @ Tanak @ Mahesh Sahu @ Tanak 3. Rajesh Prasad @ Nikki Baba @ Rajesh Sahu @ Nikki 4. Prema Devi wife of Late Suresh Prasad Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2/ 26.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 363 A, 302, 201, 120B / 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that petitioner nos. 1 to 3 had taken away 15 years old son of the informant for providing him job. It is further alleged that her son has not returned. Learned counsel submits that the informant has filed a petition before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara stating therein that she has filed the instant case under some confusion. It would appear from the prosecution case that petitioner nos. 1 to 3 had taken away son of the informant. The subsequent petition to the court would not have any credence, as despite notice the informant did not come to the court to affirm the aforesaid facts. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner nos. 1 to 3. Their prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. However, In the circumstances, in the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks from today before the court below in connection with Sahpur P.S. case no. 127 of 2009, petitioner no.-4 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five - 2 - thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sessions Judge, Bhojpur, Ara, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)