1 W.P.No.8436_2011.sxw jsn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8436 OF 2011 Smt. Vimal Laxman Gaikwad -- Petitioner V/s. Smt. Vatsala Dattu Gaikwad -- Respondent Shri K.K. Waghmare, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri Nitin P. Deshpande, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 21st December, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. On instructions of the son of the Petitioner, who is personally present in the Court the learned Counsel states that, the Petitioner is not pressing the Petitions on merits. He states that the suit premises is a residential premises consisting of two rooms and the Petitioner is occupying the same for considerably long time. He submits that the time to vacate of three years be granted. The said prayer is opposed by the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent. He, however, submits that only a reasonable time be granted. 2. The Petitioner is not pressing the Petition on merits and therefore, the decree for possession shall attain finality. The suit is of the 2 W.P.No.8436_2011.sxw year 2006. Considering the facts of the case, the time to vacate deserves to be granted till 30th April,2014. Hence I pass the following order.- i) Writ Petition is dismissed as not pressed. ii) Notwithstanding the dismissal of the Writ Petition, the decree for possession shall not be executed till 30th April, 2014, subject to condition of the Petitioner and all adult members of his family filing usual undertakings in this Court within a four weeks from today. iii) If the usual undertakings are not filed within stipulated time, the decree for possession shall become forthwith executable. [ A.S.OKA, J ]