IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M 8257 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 19, 2010 Parveen Kumar .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Sanjeev Manhas, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of direction to respondent no.2 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondent nos.3 and 4. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner will be satisfied if respondent no.2, i.e., Police Commissioner, Ludhiana, is directed to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, Annexure P2, already made to him by the petitioner in this regard. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioner, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2, i.e.,Police Commissioner, Ludhiana, to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, Annexure P2, already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioner in this regard. 19.3.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge