HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITON No.5397 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner herein is the husband of the respondent. The respondent herein filed O.P.No.203 of 2007 claiming maintenance on the file of the Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam. Pending the aforesaid O.P., the respondent filed I.A.No.75 of 2008 seeking interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.5,000/- per month and the Additional Family Court Judge, Visakhapatnam, by order dated 29.09.2010, granted interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.3,000/- p.m. from the date of filing of the petition and was directed to pay arrears of the interim maintenance on or before 16.10.2008 and further directed to pay monthly maintenance before the 10th of every succeeding month. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner-husband submits that the petitioner filed Tr.CMP.No.576 of 2008 before this Court seeking transfer of O.P.No.203 of 2007 from the file of the Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam to the file of the Family Court Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad and that this Court, by order dated 20.02.2009, had withdrawn O.P.No.203 of 2007 from the file of the Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam and transferred to the file of the Family Court Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. Learned Counsel submits that after transfer of the said O.P., it was numbered as M.C.No.2 of 2009. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to express any opinion whether O.P.No.203 of 2007 on the file of the Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam numbered as M.C.No.2 of 2009 on the file of the Family Court Judge, Hyderabad. However, it is stated that the said M.C. was dismissed for default by order dated 07.12.2009. If that be so, since the said O.P. after transfer, which is said to have been numbered as M.C.No.2 of 2009, has been dismissed for default, the Civil Revision Petition becomes infructuous. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. V. ESWARAIAH,J Date:26.11.2010 usd