IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12365 of 2011 SHYAMLI YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 02.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Although case has been registered under various provisions of the Indian Penal Code including section 307 of the IPC and under section 3(X)(XI) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act but it is stated by the informant that the petitioner gave one khanti blow which caused injury on the head. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the injury report of the informant reveals that he has received one heir line fracture on the skull said to be caused by hard and blunt substance and no injury of khanti has been found on his person. Learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer pointing out that the petitioner is author of the grievous injury on the head of the informant. So, the petitioner does not deserve privilege of bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Shyamli Yadav, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in Sikandra P.S. Case no. 81/2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)