IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 5961 of 2007 Between: 1 Dr.P.S.Prasad, s/o late P.Sanjeeva Rao, r/o 6-10, Shantiniketan, New Delhi. 2 Sunita Prasad, d/o P.S.Prasad, r/o Flat No.506, Ac Sharma Complex, S.D.Road, Secunderabad. 3 Mahita Prasad Caddell, w/o Travis Caddell, Flat No.606, A.C.Sharma Complex, S.D.Road, Secunderabad. 4 Preetha Priyadarshini, w/o L.P.Sashi Kumar, r/o Sikh Road, Secunderabad. 5 M.Surendernath, s/o M.S.Prasad, r/o Plot No.8, Him Hit Society, Flat No.B704, Sector 22, Dwaraka, New Delhi. 6 Syed Rafiddin, s/o Syed yousufuddin, H.No.1-68, Lingojiguda, Saroornagar, Hyderabad. 7 Reena Peterson, w/o R.Peterson, r/o H.No.14/240, Mirjalaguda, Malakjgiri, Hyderabad. 8 S.Satyanarayana, s/o S.Ramachandra Rao, r/o Plot No.26, Indraprastha Colony, GSI Post, Bandlaguda, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Joint Collector-II, Ranga Reddy District, at Hyderabad. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division, Chevella. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Serilingampally, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ of certiorari and quash the order of the first respondent in Case No.D5/3696/2006, dated 28-02-2007 and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over the land admeasuring acs.40.00 in Survey No.78 of Hafizpet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.SUDESH ANAND Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 5961 of 2007 Order: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded, and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 27.06.2008 Ksr/Nsr