IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2008 / 21ST POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 28024 of 2007(J) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- N.A.SALIM,AGED 48, S/O. ABDUL RAHIMAN, NALAKATH KOLADY HOUSE,VADANAPPALLY, THRISSUR-680 614. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR). RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR IN CHARGE, DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL (KERALA AND LAKSHADWEEP) 3RD FLOOR,K.S.H.B.BUILDING, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, COCHIN-682 036. 2. THE STATE BANK OF TRVANCORE, THRISSUR MAIN BRACH,THRISSUR DISTRICT, REP.BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER,IST FLOOR, GEETHANJALI,PARAMEKAVU DEVASWOM BUILDING ROUND EAST,THRISSUR. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,COLLECTORATE, AYYANTHOLE,THRISSUR. R1 & R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. M.K. PUZHPALATHA, R2 BY ADV. SRI. SAJI VARGHESE, ADV. SRI.M.PATHROSE MATTHAI (SR.). THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/01/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.28024/2007-J: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE SUMMONS RECEIVED BY THE PETITIONER FROM THE R.1. IN O.A. NO. 131/07. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE R.2. DTD. 08/08/07. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE POSSESSION NOTICE ISSUED BY THE R.2. DTD. 13/09/07. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE FURTHER NOTICE ISSUED BY THE R.2. DTD. 11/09/2007. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// prv. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No.28024 of 2007-J = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 11th day of January, 2008. JUDGMENT 1.The petitioners and others are defaulters. They are facing proceedings before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. Simultaneous proceedings are initiated under the SARFAESI Act. This writ petition is filed challenging such proceedings. 2.At the stage of admission, the petitioners had agreed before this Court to settle the liability. Accordingly, this Court granted stay for two months on certain conditions. It is reported that no conditions have been complied with. 3.Having heard the learned counsel for parties, I find no jurisdictional error or legal infirmity WP(C)28024/07 -: 2 :- in the impugned proceedings. The writ petition fails. The same is accordingly dismissed. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/