1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Civil Application No. 647 of 2011 In MCA (St) No. 4235 of 2011 Ankush v. Dy Director of Edn and ors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr P.N. Shende, adv for applicant Mr D.M. Kale, AGP for respdts 1,2 Coram: B. P. Dharmadhikari & A. P. Bhangale, JJ Dated: 24th August 2011 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant/petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondents no. 1 and 2. Prayer is to condone delay of 13 days caused in filing MCA for review. 2. MCA (St) No. 4235 of 2011 seeks review of order dated 19th January 2011 in Writ Petition No. 3455 of 2010 contending that as applicant/petitioner was appointed on 5.12.2003, he was Shikshan Sevak, is not applicable and hence, approval granted to his services on 31st March 2004 and grant made admissible as Shikshan Sevak is arbitrary and illegal. 3. Perusal of order dated 19th January 2011 reveals that apart from merit, this Court has also found that in Writ Petition No. 3392 of 2009 same relief was claimed and it was disposed of. It is also noticed that petitioner did not raise any grievance 2 for almost seven years after approval was given to him in 2004. 4. In this situation, as we find review as moved itself is misconceived, application rejected. Judge Judge joshi