IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2010 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 23216 of 2007(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- C.C.JACOB,MANAGING PARTNER, SREE CHAKRA POLYMERS,MULAYAM,VALAKKAVU, THRISSUR DISTRICT. RESIDING AT CHEENAPPILLY HOUSE, PLOT NO.26, IST GAGE,GOSAIKUNU, KURIACHIRA (PO) THRISSUR-680 006. BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDHUTHI BHAVAN,PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, ANTI POWER THEFT SQUAD, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDHUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL CIRCLE, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, THRISSUR. 4. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, NADATHARA, THRISSUR. 5. THE SUB ENGINEER IN CHARGE, ELECTRICAL SECTION, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, NADATHARA, THRISSUR. ADV. SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B FOR R1 TO 5 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No. 23216 of 2007 ================== Dated this the 21st day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved by the demand for electricity charges. On 31.7.2007, this Court passed the following interim order; “Going by the clearcut findings in Ext.P7 which is conscious tampering of metre and theft of power, the petitioner is not entitled to any stay. However, being a running industry, I fee pending decision in the W.P.(C) petitioner can be granted instalments to celar the arrears. Accordingly, petitioner is granted six equal monthly instalments to clear the disputed arrears, first of which will be paid on or before 15.8.2007 and balance on or before 15th of succeeding five moths. Recovery proceedings will be kept in abeyance for payment as above and if default is committed, respondents can disconnect supply. Payment will be subject to result of W.P. Post W.P. in the usual course for hearing.” The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already paid the amounts as per the interim order and therefore the writ petition may be disposed of in terms of the interim order. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the interim order. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge