CWP No. 14890 of 2007 M/s LaxmiPaper Mills v. State of Haryana and others Present: Mr. Rajesh Bansal, Advocate with Mr.M.S.Kohli, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate for the respondents. *** The petitioners have challenged the demand of enhanced security being made from them. Such demand has been made in view of Notification No. HERC-12 of 2005. Though the petitioners have challenged the said Notification but neither the copy thereof has been appended, nor the Haryana State Electricity Regulatory Commission ( which has issued Notification) been impleaded as a party nor has any ground been alleged in the writ petition to challenge the said Notification. The petitioners seek permission to withdraw this petition to file a fresh one on the same cause of action. The only caveat that learned counsel have put is that the petitioners were permitted to furnish security by way of bank guarantee should continue for reasonable time so as to enable the petitioners to file a fresh petition and seek appropriate interim order from the Court. Learned counsel for the respondents has very fairly stated that the said respondents will not encash the bank guarantee for a period of 30 days from today unless there is a default in the payment of the bill by any petitioner. CWP No. 14890 of 2007 -2- In this view of the matter, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners as aforesaid. Copy of this order be given to learned counsel for the parties under the signatures of the Reader of this Court. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE August 20, 2008 sunita