BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Third day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.14306 of 2011 1. K. MURALIRAJA 2. S. KARTHIKEYAN @ SEKAR 3. P. RAMASAMY @ CHINNARAMAN 4. M.SENTHIL PORKUMARAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 4 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VELAYUTHAMPALAYAM POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT. CR NO.312/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. N.SHANMUGASELVAM Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are accused in Crime No.312 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for offences under Sections 342, 323, 506(i) r/w Section 379 (Non Professional) of I.P.C. Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police, the petitioners have come up with this petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of prosecution, due to election motive, the de-facto complainant was attacked by these petitioners with hands. It is also the case that in the said occurrence, a gold chain weighing 3 1/2 sovereign and a cell phone were found missing. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would deny the above allegations. According to him, due to political motive, the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. 4. I have considered the above submissions. 5. Having regard to the nature of motive between the parties and the gravity of offence, and all other attendant circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners but with conditions. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Karur, on executing separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that petitioners shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks, without fail. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. sd/- 03/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, KARUR. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KARUR. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VELAYUTHAMPALAYAM POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. SR : 09.11.2011 : 2P/5C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14306 of 2011 Date :03/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/