*1* 913-1-11 srj IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.1 OF 2011 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.750 OF 2008 MTZ Polyfilms Ltd. .. Petitioner. v/s. Marathwada Packaging Pvt, Ltd., ..Respondent. Mr. Haresh Jagtiani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anil D’Souza, Mr. Abhijit Shinde and Ms. Jennifer Michael, for Petitioner. Mr. Vatsal Shah with Mr. A.R.Bamne, for Respondent No.1. Ms. Azmin Irani, for the Official Liquidator. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 27 th JANUARY, 2011. P.C. :- 1 I am inclined to re-call the order dated 3rd August, 2010 sought to be reviewed. A question of law has been raised today which was not considered in my order dated 3rd August, 2010 which is sought to be reviewed. 2 The Respondent and its Advocate were absent. I do not wish to visit the drastic consequence of a winding up order upon the Respondent for the possible default of its earstile Advocate. I make it clear that the question raised on behalf of the Review Petitioner in the Petition, is kept open and has not been decided. *2* 913-1-11 3 The order dated 3rd August, 2010 is, therefore, re-called. The Company Petition shall appear for hearing before the regular court. Pending the hearing and final disposal of the Company Petition, the ad- interim order dated 7th January, 2011 in this Review Petition shall continue. This, however, is subject to liberty to the parties to adopt proceedings for any interim relief including for the modification of or vacating the order dated 7th January, 2011. 4 The Review Petition is accordingly disposed of.