1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.684 OF 2003 The Director of Income Tax (Exemption) Mumbai. Appellant vs. Sind Educationists Association, Respondent Ms.S.V.Bharucha i/b. Mr.S.S.Sarkar for the appellant. CORAM : R. M. LODHA & J.P. DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED : 21st December 2004 P.C. Heard. 2. The Tribunal relied upon its earlier orders passed in the assessee’s own case for Assessment Years 1991-92, 1992-93, 1993-94. Though in the memorandum of appeal, it is stated that the decision of the Tribunal for the Assessment Year 1991-92, 1992-93 and 1993-94 have been challenged under Section 260A in appeals vide lodging numbers 991/2003 and 990/2003. The learned counsel for the revenue submitted that the said lodging numbers are not correctly stated and nothing is available with her to suggest that the appeals against the decisions of the Tribunal for earlier assessment years are pending. 3. In this view of the matter, we are satisfied that 2 the appeal does not give rise to any substantial question of law. 4. Dismissed in limine. (R.M. (R.M. (R.M. LODHA,J.) LODHA,J.) LODHA,J.) (J.P. (J.P. (J.P. DEVADHAR,J.) DEVADHAR,J.) DEVADHAR,J.)