IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7116 OF 2009 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. Mr.R.A.Thorat i/b Ms Vimala Gupta for the petitioner Mr.R.D.Vora for the respondent No.6. CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : AUGUST 14,2009 P.C.: . Not on board. Taken on board and heard for admission. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioners are the original defendant nos.3 and 4. The first respondent is the original plaintiff. By the impugned order passed by the trial court, the first respondent-plaintiff has been permitted to carried out amendment to the plaint. After having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, I find no error in the impugned order permitting the plaintiff to carry out amendment. No case is made out for interference in writ jurisdiction. Writ petition is rejected. 2 However, all contentions on merits are kept open. It will be open for the petitioner to file additional written statement to the amended plaint within six weeks from today. JUDGE