IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8774 of 2010 1. BINOD KUMAR DAS S/O LATE SHUKHDEO LAL DAS R/O VILL. & P.O.- RAJNI BABHANGAMA, P.S.- BEHARIGANJ, DISTT.- MADHEPURA AT PRESENT WORKING ON THE POST OF KAMDAR, PLANT PROTECTION CENTRE KAHRA (SATTAR KATAIYA), DISTT.- SAHARSA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. AGRICULTURE PRODUCTION COMMISSIONER, BIHAR, PATNA 3. SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. DIRECTOR AGRICULTURE, BIHAR, PATNA 5. JOINT DIRECTOR AGRICULTURE (PLANT PROTECTION), BIHAR, MITHAPUR FARM, PATNA 6. DY. DIRECTOR AGRICULTURE (PLANT PROTECTION), SAHARSA 7. JUNIOR PLANT PROTECTION OFFICER, SAHARSA 8. JUNIOR PLANT PROTECTION OFFICER, PURNIA 9. BLOCK AGRICULTURE OFFICER, KAHRA BLOCK, SAHARSA FOR THE PETITIONER :- MR. SHANTI PRATAP, ADVOCATE MR. ARVIND KUMAR VERMA, ADVOCATE FOR THE STATE :- AC TO GP 21. ----------- 02/ 29.06.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. Prayer of the petitioner is for quashing of the order contained in Memo No. 22/497 dated 21.4.2010 issued by the Joint Director of Agriculture (Plant Protection), Bihar, Patna, whereby provisionally the petitioner has been transferred at Plant Protection Centre, Patna City under the disposal of Junior Plant Protection Officer, Patna. The petitioner is aggrieved by this order for the reason that his wife is posted at Saharsa and after undergoing the Heart surgery he needs proper care, as such, if possible he should have been transfer to a place, nearer to his wife’s place of - 2 - posting. On perusal of the impugned order, I find that the transfer order has been issued completely on humanitarian ground considering the health related problems of the petitioner and also that he needed facility for proper treatment of his health problems. The transfer order indicates that it is provisional order and once the petitioner is physically fit a regular transfer order will be issued. In case the petitioner has any grievance the remedy available to him is by representing his case before the concerned authorities. I do not find any reason to interfere with this order. This application is being disposed of, directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass necessary orders within one month from the date of production/ communication of this order. DKS/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)