PNP 1 WP1202-17.2.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1202 OF 2011 Subhash Ramchandra Durge ..Petitioner. versus Bank of Baroda ..Respondent. ..... Mr. Amit Borkar for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent. ...... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & ANOOP V. MOHTA , JJ. 17 February 2011. P.C. : The Petition has been mentioned for urgent orders and has been taken up for admission on the request of counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner. Both the Tribunal and the Appellate Tribunal have come to the conclusion that there was no merit in the application filed by the Petitioner under Rule 22(6) of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (Procedure) Rules 1993 for summoning the witness for cross examination. The bank had filed an affidavit in lieu of the examination-in-chief as far back as in 2004. The application for cross examination was taken out only in 2010. We are not inclined at this stage to interfere with the interlocutory order of the Tribunal. There is no merit in the Petition which is accordingly dismissed. (Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.) (Anoop V. Mohta, J.)