A IN TH3 HTGH COURT O KARNiTKA T DTED THIS 3RD DY O 1 PRI 1°8 BEFO TiE HON’BiE!1R.JUSTICE B.V.SATGIAD WRIT TETTTIG NOS.1129q_303/q8 BET ‘jiEET: 1. Mohmad AsTern, S/o Abdu]. Setter Sab, major, Prop, S.P.Motor Service, ilichodu, Jagalur Ta, Davnaere Dist. 2. Moh4. AsTern, —do— 3. Smt.S.J.Tndirrnrna, W/o lte S.V.Jayarudrpe, Prop. Dhnalakshmi Motor Service , rest 4, Srnt. S .J , Indiramma, —do— 5 • !nt. Bhadramma, W/o late P.C.Lingnaowda, Madiinakere, Jlur Tq, Devanagere Dir. (By Sri Rajasekhar, Advocate ) AND The RTA, Chitradurga by its Secretary. RESPOW)E’T (By Sri i’.B.Prabtiakar, HCGP ) These Writ re,itions filed under art. 26 sni 227 of’ the Constitution of In4is rr’yin to quash the notices issued by the srondnt vide Pnnexures—A to C. These writ retitons corning on for rre— lirninary heiring this day the Court made ie fol owin: S ORDER The petitioners are th 4 ermit holders I to operate t ie buns. Time and •rin, they have renewed their termite. But, finally after the last renewal, the permita valid up to 314.2002, 314—2002 &1—7—1999 respect ively. 2. Trie critention of r.Raiase1rhmr, leqrned counel for the petitioner is t’tt the uthnity -respondent has ie.ued tie suo motu notice directing the petitioners to tila fresh appliotione for rerawal of the permits. 3. Heard KraprabhakPr, le’irned TICGP. 4. Mr.Rajaeekhr, le2rned counsel for the petitioners relied uton the order veered by thie Court in W.P.Wo.’5032/C?8 dt. 18—2—1Q$ wherein it is hild that the act of the eutho— rity calliw upon the petitionrs to file fnst appliet ions for the renewal is impermiesibte. Hence these petitions are 1iab1e allowech In the result, the petitions sre allowed. Annexuree-, B and C are quashed. .1 Sd/ jD a ko/