IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 76 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 708 OF 2007 Rajesh @ Raja Nana Patil ...Applicant/Appellant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents Mrs. Sulbha A. Dhamale for the Applicant. Mr. U.V.Kejariwal, APP for State. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI & A.R.JOSHI, JJ DATED : 12TH FEBRUARY, 2009. P.C. The Applicant was granted parole leave for 30 days from 2nd September, 2008. Before expiry of leave period he moved another application dated 29th September, 2008 for extension by 30 days, which was granted. So in all, he was granted parole leave of 60 days, But before expiry of 60 days, he again moved another application dated 22nd October, 2008 for extension of further 30 days. He did not receive any communication from the Jail Authorities. Therefore, the Applicants submits that he presumed that the extension had been granted and he surrendered -2- after another 30 days. After his surrender, the respondent passed an order rejecting his parole leave application . It would have been nice, if the application of the Applicant had been decided immediately after it was received. But, deciding the application after sometime would also not give any reason to the Applicant to presume that the sanction has been granted. For this reason, we do not find any merit in the application, same is accordingly dismissed. (A. R. JOSHI, J.) (BILAL NAZKI, J.)