(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9545 OF 2003 WRIT PETITION NO. 9545 OF 2003 WRIT PETITION NO. 9545 OF 2003 Karanja Machhimar Vividh Karyakari Sahakari Society Ltd. ...Petitioner Versus Gajanan N.Patil & Ors. ...Respondents ..... Mr. P.M. Mokashi, counsel for Petitioner Mr. T.G. Vartak, counsel for Respondent. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 15TH APRIL, 2005 DATED: 15TH APRIL, 2005 DATED: 15TH APRIL, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. The learned counsel for the respective parties state that the settlement has been arrived at between the petitioner and the Maharashtra Karanja Machhimar Vividh Karyakari Sahakari Karmachari Sanghatana U/sec. 3(p) r.w. Section 18(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in view of the said settlement, the subject matter of this petition stands resolved between the parties. 2. The declaration by 25 of the respondents workmen accepting the said settlement has been placed on record. The remaining four respondents are no more in the service of the petitioner and three of them by (-2-) separate letters informed the Chairman of the petitioner society that in terms of the settlement referred to hereinabove, their claims are duly satisfied and they have no objection for the society to withdraw the amount deposited in this Court. They have also indicated that the dispute involved in this petition would be settled in terms of the same compromise as are set out in the settlement dated 3.2.2005. The declaration or undertaking of the 29 respondents would be placed on record within two weeks from today. 3. The learned counsel for the respective parties, therefore, pray for disposal of the writ petition in terms of the settlement dated 3.2.2005. Leave granted. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the settlement dated 3.2.2005. Rule discharged with no order as to costs. 4. The petitioner society is allowed to withdraw the amount deposited with the registry of this Court. *****