IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 261 OF 2006 SHRI GAJENDRANATH R.USGAONKAR,ALTO ....Applicant PORVORIM,BARDEZ GOA. Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH THE CHIEF ....Respondents SECRETARY OF THE GOVT.OF GOA AND 4 ORS., Mr. V.Tamba, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Ms. R. Chodankar, Additional Government Advocate for the Respondent Nos.1 and 5. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 2nd May, 2006 P.C.:- Heard Mr. V. R. Tamba, the learned Counsel for the applicant and Mr. S. S. Kantak, the learned Advocate General for the respondent nos.1 and 5. By this application, the applicant who is the petitioner in Writ Petition No.156 of 2006 seeks leave to produce 3 documents. The learned Advocate General has no objection if the applicant is permitted to produce the documents.The petition has not yet been admitted. Hence, the application is allowed. The applicant is allowed to bring on record the documents mentioned in prayer clause (a). Application stands disposed of. Await service on respondent nos.2, 3 and 4. A. P. LAVANDE, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.