IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46104 of 2008 AKHILESH SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.12.2008 Heard Sri Pramod Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The learned Additional Sessions Judge-VII, Patna appears missing the tress for the woods. Had he really appreciated the contents of the two paragraphs which appears quite belated in the stage of investigation he ought not to have refused the prayer for bail of this petitioner. The supervision note does not have any value as regards the judicial consideration on such matters and secondly merely being related to a lady may not be sufficient to infer, in absence of concrete material, that one could have hand in the causing disappearance of the lady by any means. I believe that the learned Judge, henceforth, does not fall in the error of the class he has fallen in. Let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M. Danapur in Bikram(Rani Talab)P.S.Case No.149 of 2003. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )