IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 19TH DECEMBER 2008 / 28TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 37606 of 2008(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- L.SASIKALA, AGED 41 YEARS W/O. N.HARIKRISHNAN, H.S.A. GOVT, HIGH SCHOOL VEERANAKAVU, KATTAKADA, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA REP.BY THE SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT TRIVANDRUM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. A.J. VARGHESE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ----------------------- W.P.(C).No.37606/ 2008 ------------------------ Dated this the 19th day of December, 2008. JUDGMENT Petitioner states that he was granted leave without allowance based on his application, for the period from 1.10.2001 to 30.3.2002 subject to the condition that the period will not be reckoned for service benefits including increments. According to the petitioner the said clause is in conflict with the rules contained in the KSR and the judgment of this court reported in 2007(1) KLT 71. 2. Highlighting these grievance and seeking the deletion of the condition referred to above, Petitioner states that he has filed Exts.P1 and P2 before the first respondent and the complaint now raised is that orders have not been passed on the representations so made. 3. If as stated by the petitioner, he has filed Exts.P1 and P2 objecting to the conditions incorporated in the order granting leave without allowance, the 2 respondent shall consider the same. Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition directing that the respondent shall consider and pass orders on Exts.P1 and P2. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 3 months from the date of production of a copy of the judgment and with notice to the Petitioner. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ 3