IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO. 861 OF 2006 NO. 861 OF 2006 NO. 861 OF 2006 IN IN IN ARBITRATION ARBITRATION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 389 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 389 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 389 OF 2006 Abu Malik ] .. Appellant (Ori.Respondent) Versus Sushmita Sen ] .. Respondent (Ori.Petitioner) Mr. A.M. Saraogi for the appellant. Mr. Pratik Sakseria i/b M/s. B. Munim & Co. for the respondent. CORAM: R.M. LODHA, & S.A. BOBDE, JJ. DATED: 04TH DECEMBER, 2006 P.C. : . Heard. 2. Mr. A.M. Saraogi, the counsel for the appellant does not dispute that the appellant, in his Affidavit in the Arbitration Petition, has stated that he has no intention to claim any amount lying with M/s. Navy Impex LLC. In this view of the matter, we find no occasion for the appellant to challenge the impugned order, particularly in the light of the categorical statement made by the learned counsel that Anand Pan : 2 : Centre, UK and Euro Catering, 2000, UK are not the appellant’s agents. 2. The impugned order does not call for any interference. . Appeal is dismissed in limine. Sd/- [R.M. [R.M. [R.M. LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] Sd/- [S.A. [S.A. [S.A. BOBDE, J.] BOBDE, J.] BOBDE, J.]