- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.535 OF 2008 ----------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s appearances, Court’s orders order or directions ----------------------------------------------------- ¦ Mr.Dilip Bodke for the Petitioner. ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH J. ¦ DATED: 27th June, 2008 P.C.: By this petition the Petitioner challenges the concurrent findings recorded by both the courts below that the Petitioner /Plaintiff is not entitled to temporary injunction to operate during the pendency of the suit. A temporary injunction was sought by the Petitioner/Plaintiff on the footing that he is in possession of the land in question i.e. Gat No.95. The Courts below recorded a finding that the entries in the revenue record right from 1972 shows that Gat No.95 - 2 - is in possession of the Defendant No.5. Entries in the revenue record have presumptive value and therefore, at least at a prima facie stage the court is justified in going by the entries in the revenue record. 2. After having heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner, I do not see any reason to interfere with the order impugned. Petition is, therefore, rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)