IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 8940 of 1990 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- HIRALAL K PADHIAR Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR CK PANDYA for MR SV RAJU for Petitioners MR MUKESH PATEL, ld.AGP Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA and MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA Date of decision: 04/04/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA) Mr. Pandya has submitted that his clients have orally informed him that the impugned order has been withdrawn by the State Government and the matter has become infructuous. Mr.Mukesh Patel, ld.AGP is not in a position to controvert this statement made by Mr.Pandya on behalf of the petitioners. In this view of the matter, this Special Civil Application is hereby rejected as having become infructuous. The Rule is hereby discharged. Interim relief, if any, shall stand vacated automatically. 4th April 2001 (M.R. Calla, J.) (D.H.Waghela, J.) Sreeram.