BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 1C.G.1 WRIT PETITION (Cl NO. g H Hg [2010 PETlTiONERS /1. Ramchand Meghani S/o. Shri arunomal Meghani, aged about 50 years, 2. Smt. Rajkumari Meghani W/o. Shri Sarwanand Meghani, aged about 45 years, R/o. Civil Lines, Raipur,‘District Raipur (06.) VERSUS / : Municipal Corporatiori, Raipur, Through- it’s Commissioner, District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSITUTION RESPONDENT OF INDIA. B ‘ 6% _ .HIGHCOURT OFG‘IHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0. 4417 of 2010 Petitioners Ramchand Meghani & Another Versus Responden! Municipal Corporation, Raipur. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INHA (SB : Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present :- shri Saurabh Dangi, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate for the respondent. v ORDER ORAL (Passed on 11 day of August,2010) ' 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation submits that there is no contempiation for demolition of any structure, which I is duly legal and authorised, in respect of the petitioners, without affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. 2. Shri Agrawal further submits that no demolition in respect of the property in dispute shall be done without affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. In view of foregoing, nothing remains in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the petition is dismiesed with the above- stated observation. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 4. No order asto costs. Ashok