IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 11475 of 2007 Between: Yarragopu Venkateswara Rao S/o.Sri Y.Sarveswara Rao R/o.D.No.19-3-2, yarragopu vari street (SP Street) Bhimavaram, West Godavari District ..... PETITIONER AND Bhimavaram Municipality, Bhimavaram, West Godavari Dsitrict, rep.by its Commissioner .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the action of the respondent municipality in not taking any action on the Representation dated 28.12.2006 submitted by the petitioner herein and the Legal Notice dated 16.1.2007 got issued by the petitioner to the respondent for payment of amount of Rs.18,00,000/- (Rupees Eighteeen Lakhs Only) due to the petitioner herein for the work so far executed by the petitioner in respect of construction of Samagundam outlet Drain as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonabel and violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the constitution of India and consequently direct therespondent hereinto take action on the representation dated 28.12.2006 submitted by the petitioner herein and the Legal Notice dated 16.1.2007 got issued by the petitioner herein to the Respondent for payment of amount of Rs.18,00,000/-(Eighteen lakhs rupees only) due to the petitioner for the work so far executed by the petitioner in respect of construction of somagundam outlet Drain. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A.V.SESHA SAI Counsel for the Respondent: SRI S.NAGESWARA REDDY The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.11475 of 2007 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. __________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY,J 28.04.2009 v v