1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITIONS NO. 384, 385 AND 386 OF 2006. Writ Petition No. 384 of 2006. Smt. Vassanti Vinayak Asnodkar, Porvorim, Bardez, Goa. .... Petitioner. Versus State of Goa, Through its Chief Secretary and 2 Others. .... Respondents. Writ Petitions No. 385 and 386 of 2006. Shri Vinayak G. Asnodkar, Porvorim, Bardez, Goa. .... Petitioner. Versus State of Goa, Through its Chief Secretary and 2 Others. .... Respondents. Mr. N. Sardessai with Mr. D. Pangam, Advocates for the Petitioners. Mr. G. Shirodkar, Addl. Government Advocate for the Respondents. P.C.: During the course of hearing both the petitioners have filed an undertaking to remove the suit structure within a period of three months from today. The undertaking is signed by both the petitioners who are present in the Court in person, identified by Mr. Pangam, Advocate appearing for the petitioners. Shri Pangam has also put his counter 2 signature on the undertaking in support thereof. The undertaking given is accepted and the same is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. All the three petitions are dismissed in limine with a direction that the impugned order shall not be given effect to for a period of three months since the petitioners have undertaken to remove the suit structure on their own. It is made clear that within a period of three months if the suit structure is not removed by the petitioners, in that event it would be open for the authorities (respondents) to remove it at the cost of the petitioners and and it would also be open for them to initiate any other action against the petitioners as may be permissible in law. sl. V. C. DAGA, J.