IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1000 OF 2005 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 34 OF 2005 SHRI JOSE MANUEL OCTAVIO DA COSTA ....Applicants RODRIGUES AND ANR., Versus MS. MARIA TEREZA DA COSTA ....Respondent RODRIGUES, PANAJI GOA. Applicants in person. Ms.L.Dharmadkar for respondent Nos.2(a),(b) & (C). Coram:- V.C.DAGA, J. Date:- 26th July, 2006 P.C. : Heard. The Learned counsel for respondent/ original appellant has opposed grant of this application. It is not in dispute that parties sought to be added to the appeal by this application were parties to the inventory proceedings. In that view of the matter, they would be necessary parties to the present proceedings. Hence their application needs to be allowed. The persons named in (para-2) the application are allowed to be brought on record as respondents. It is, however, made clear that their addition shall be treated from the date of this order. The effect of belated addition of these persons to be considered at the time of final hearing of the appeal. Appellants are directed to carry out necessary amendment in the cause-title of the memo of appeal within two weeks from today. Civil application stands disposed of in terms of this order with no order as to costs. V.C.DAGA, J. SK