IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5256 of 2007 BIRBAL PRASAD, Son of Satya Narayan Bhakt, Resident of Village – Nirwati Khurd, Post – Nirwatikala, Police Station -Raghunathpur, District – Siwan. --------- Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. 4. District Account Officer, Siwan, Kachhari Campus, Siwan. 5. The District Superintendent of Education, Siwan, B.M. Middle School, Siwan. 6. The District Provident Fund Officer, Siwan, Kachhari, Campus, Siwan. 7. The District Treasury Officer, Siwan, Kachhari Campus, Siwan. ---------- Respondents ----------- 4/ 11/5/2011 Heard Sri Manoj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 3/Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. None appeared on behalf of respondent/State. In this case, yesterday also, on call, none had appeared on behalf of the State. The present petition was filed with a prayer to direct the respondents to make payment of amount of G.P.F. with statutory interest, difference of salary from 1/1/1971 to 31/3/1973 deposited in Provident Fund Account along with admissible interest and also for revision of pension relating to his father who was a teacher in Govt. Middle School, Padri, Panch Bhinda, Siwan. In this case, a counter affidavit was filed on behalf of respondent nos. 4 & 6 i.e. District Account Officer, Siwan and District Provident Fund Officer, Siwan. In the counter affidavit in paragraph no. 8, it has been stated, that difference of pay deposited in G.P.F. account for the 2 period of 1/1/1971 to 31/3/1973 and revision of pension was required to be done by the Education Department as well as Accountant General, Bihar. Regarding G.P.F. amount, it has been indicated that same was authorised to District Superintendent of Education, Siwan, which is evident from statement made in paragraph no. 4 of the counter affidavit of respondent nos. 4 & 6. In view of the facts and circumstances particularly the fact that neither any counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of District Superintendent of Education, Siwan nor any one had appeared on behalf of the State, the Court is of the opinion that the writ petition can be allowed directing the respondent no. 5/District Superintendent of Education, Siwan, to make payment of aforesaid amount within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. So far revision of pension is concerned, the petitioner can file representation before the competent authority. If such representation is filed, it is expected that same will be examined in its right perspective without any delay. The writ petition stands disposed of with above observation and direction. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)