CRM-M No.31557 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CRM-M No.31557 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.01.2011 Manmohan Vermani ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Sidhu, DAG, Punjab for the State. Mr. H.S. Grewal, Advocate for the complainant. ... Alok Singh, J (Oral). This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.213 dated 13.12.2010 under Sections 420/467/468/471/120-B IPC , P.S. Mandi Gobindgarh, District Fatehgarh Sahib. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has been enlarged on bail pursuant to the directions issued by this Court dated 27.10.2010 and he has joined investigation. Learned counsel for the CRM-M No.31557 of 2010 2 petitioner further states that the agreement to sell in question was challenged in a civil suit, which is already pending before the competent Civil Court and the possession of the accused has been protected by the Civil Court. He also states that civil litigation has been given the colour of the criminal offence. Learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, states that some of the receipts are yet to be recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of this case, specially when civil suit is pending pertaining to the same agreement to sell and the possession of the petitioner – accused has been protected by the Civil Court, present petition is disposed of making the order dated 27.10.2010 absolute, subject to the limitations provided under Section 438 (2) of the Code. Petitioner – accused shall participate in the investigation as and when he is required. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 06.01.2011 sk.