HtGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DB.HON'BLESHRIDHIRENDMMtSH^^ ^ON'BLESHR[RXCHANDRAKAR;JJ AeeeUant Petltjoner Versus WritA@J^aiNo, 331 gf 2010 A. Chandrashekhar, S/o Late Shri AP Dora, aged about 41 years, R/o Quarter No.1B/121, SBS Coiony, SECL, Korba (CG), President of SECL, Boys CSub. Respondents 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Sports and Youth WeStere D©partrrs©nt,DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG) The Registrar, Firms and Socseties, Chhattisgarh, 0-5, Anupam Nagar, Raipur (CG) Assistant Registrar, Firms and Societies, Bilaspur Division, Jarhabhata, Vikrant Bhawan, Bilaspur (CG) The District Sports Officer, Sports and Youth Wejfare Department, Office of Superintendent of Police, Korba, District Korba (CG) Chhattisgarh Footbal! Association, ttirough its Honorary Secretary, Dr. GD Gandhi, R/o-BKD-5, Sector-09, Bhilai Township, District Durg (CG) Korba District Footbail Association, through its President Jai Singh Agrawai, Durpa Marg, Korba, District Korba (CG) IMaseem Akhtar Khan, R/'o Quarter No.33. Sec.-7, Satco Township, District Korba (CG) Present: Shri R.S. Baghel, counsel for the appeflant. Shri Sudhir Bajpai, Oy. Govt. Advocate forthe State. ^ ORALORDER ^l (23raSeptember,2010) Per Dhinendra Mishra, J The petitioner filed writ petition making allegations of irregularities by the Secretary of respondent No. 6 association and prayed for directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to supersede respondent No.6 and to take its management under Section 33 of the Chhattisgarh Society Registrikaran Adhiniyam, 1973 (in short"the Adhiniyam, 1973"). The writ petition has been dismissed with an observation that the petitioner has not approached the State Govemment or the Regtetrar for exercise of its power under the provisions of Section 33 of the Adhm?yam, 1973 and he has not established any tegally enforceable right to seek the afore-steted writ of mandamus or any other wrrt. However, liberty has been ^ ^ ^ ^i^^, | ';;. 'N-^.^r \s"- reserved to the petitioner to make appropriate application to the Registrar of Societies or the State Government, as the case may be, seeking exercise of power under Section 33 of the Adhiniyam, 1973. Having heard ieamed counsel for ftte parties, having perused the documents annexed with the writ petjtion, inctuding the document of Annexure-D, we are of the opinion that st has been rightiy held in the impugned order that the petitioner filed writ petition without approaching the Stete Government or Registrar for exercise of powers under the provisions of Section 33 of the Adhiniyam, 1973. We find no substance in this appeai, the same deserves to be and is, accordingiy, dismissed at the admissiion stage Sd/- Dhirendra Mishar Judge Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge K/'