The Madhya Pradcsh Administrativg Tribunal at Raipur vide 'inten’m 0rd¢r dated 27.1 l .2001 directed to maintain status quo in regard to the position of the petitioner as was prevailing on 12,10,2001. By virtue of the interim order the petitioner is continuing at the original place of posting. Be that as it may, with the passage of time this petition has. become inhuctuous as period of transfer is not appiicable forever, At this point of time, there is no question to examine the validity of the transfer order, However? the respondents are at libertyrto pass appropriate order keeping in View the public interest and administrative exigency, without insisting on compiianee of the impugned transfer order. It is well settled principle of law that transfer is an ineident of service and it is for the employer to decide as to where a particular officer/employee he posted, keeping in view public interest as well as administrative exigency, This Court has limited jurisdiction to interfere in the transfer matter and this Court can interfere only in the case of proved malatidei non— competence of authority passing the transfer order and transfer order not being in conformity with the lilies and regulations. In View ofthe above; this petition stands disposed of No order as t0 COStS. SdL Satish K. Agnihotri i Judge 5 l "’l