IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- SPL. APPL. WRIT No. 368 of 2009 HINDUSTAN ZINC LIMITED V/S STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Mr.RAMIT MEHTA for Mr. LR MEHTA, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 8.5.2009 HON'BLE SHRI A.M.KAPADIA,J. HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the appellant. It is pointed out by the learned counsel that the same learned Single Judge has passed different orders inasmuch as in some matters demand has been stayed completely while in some matters portion of the demand has been stayed. Obviously, consistency in the orders is required to be maintained but then in the totality of circumstances, we do not feel inclined to interfere in appeal, and direct the appellant to file appropriate application before the learned Single Judge inviting attention to the other set of orders, and invoking jurisdiction to maintain consistency. The appeal accordingly stands disposed of with the aforesaid observations. ( N P GUPTA ),J. ( A.M.KAPADIA ),J. /Sushil/