1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 97 OF 2010 (Shakuntala G. Motghare vs. Baburao D. Meshram & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. MARCH 10, 2010. Heard Ms. Khisti, Advocate holding for Shri Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner - plaintiff and Shri Shrivastava, learned counsel for the respondents – defendants. By the impugned order dated 24.09.2009, the prayer of the petitioner for issuing direction to the respondents to produce original power of attorney and original of alleged sale deed dated 02.11.2005 has been rejected. Ms. Khisti, learned counsel argues that as the petitioner apprehends creation of third party interest on the basis of these documents, the production was sought. She further points out that the petitioner – plaintiff is under cross examination and challenge in the suit is to these documents. Shri Shrivasatava, learned counsel, on the other hand states that the prayer for temporary injunction to restrain the respondents from creating any third party interest is already rejected on more than one 2 occasion. He further states that the petitioner – plaintiff is under cross examination but the copies of these documents filed on record are duly verified. He further points out that to avoid any complication, the originals of these documents are available with counsel for the respondents – defendants before trial Court during the recording of evidence. In view of the fact that prayer for interim relief is already rejected and the documents (original) are available with the counsel for the respondents – defendants while recording of evidence is going on, it is apparent that no exception can be taken to impugned order. Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.