IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No. 19245 of 1997 Between: Shaik Shavali, S/o. Nurulla, R/o. Nandikotkur, Kunronnl Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Regional Manger, Andhra Bank, Kurnool , Kurnool Dist. 2 The Dist. Industries Centre, Kurnool , Kurnool Dist. 3 The Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Nandikotkur, Kurnool Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in returning the application of the petitioner for sanction of the loan under (PMRY) scheme in his Letter no.390/28/PMRY/140 ,dt.12.8.1996 as bad, arbitrary prejudicial and contrary to the facts and circumstances of the case and consequently direct the respondents to release the sanctioned loan amount in favour of the petitioner in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr.C.DAMODHAR REDDY Counsel for Respondents : Mr.A.KRISHNAM RAJU The Court made the following : ORDER: The learned counsel for petitioner states that he is not pressing the writ petition. Recording the said submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. No costs. _____________ N.V.RAMANA, J Date: 25.3.2005 DA/SVV To 1. The Regional Manger, Andhra Bank, Kurnool , Kurnool Dist. 2. The Dist. Industries Centre, Kurnool , Kurnool Dist. 3. The Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Nandikotkur, Kurnool Dist. 4. Two CD copies.