IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 3RD DECEMBER 2007 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 WP(C).No. 34761 of 2007(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ T.P.MOHAMMED USMAN S/O. ABU, THRIKANNUR PILATHOTTATHIL HOUSE P.O. CHENAKKALANGADI, VIA THENHIPALAM MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY MALAPPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY MALAPPURAM. 3. THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER K.S.R.T.C MALAPPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. --------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) 34761 OF 2007 --------------------------------------------------- Dated: December 3, 2007 JUDGMENT The petitioner is challenging Ext.P6 by which the request for regular permit has been rejected. 2. According to the1st respondent the route applied for is hit by the provisions contained in the notification dated 9.5.2007. This reason adopted by the respondent cannot be said to be faulty. If that be so, the petitioner is not entitled to the relief sought for. 3. However, the petitioner submits that he may be given an opportunity to make a fresh request avoiding the route notified in the notification. If the petitioner so chooses, it is always open to him to make a fresh application and Ext.P6 does not stand in his way. The writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE mt/-