IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30365 of 2010 ASH NARAYAN SINGH, Son of Late Basgat Singh Resident of Village- Phalkiya, P.S. Kashariya, District- East Champaran (Motihari) ----------------Petitioner Versus 1. DEO DHARI DAS, Son of Sokha Das 2. Pashupati Nath Pandey, 3. Someshawar Nath Pandey, Son of Pashupati Nath Pandey, 4. The State of Bihar All Resident of Village Fultakiya, P.S. Keshariya, Dist- East Champaran ---------------Opposite parties ----------- 3. 01.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for opposite party nos. 1 to 3. No show cause has been filed on behalf of the opposite parties. This application has been filed by the complainant of Complaint Case No. C-248 of 2009 with a prayer to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to opposite party nos. 1 to 3 vide order dated 10.12.2009 in Cr. Misc. No. 36630 of 2009. In support of his contention that the opposite parties have mislead the Court by suppressing the fact regarding their surrender before the Court below for grant of Regular bail and thus the order of anticipatory bail in their favour on 10.12.2009 was passed has annexed the order sheet of Complaint Case No. 248 of 2009. 2 The order sheet of complaint case shows that on 14.9.2009 bailable warrant of arrest was issued against opposite parties. On 16.9.2009 they surrenderd in the Trial Court for grant of Regular Bail. Before the application for grant of anticipatory bail could have been taken, opposite parties, absconded and filed anticipatory bail before this Court, suppressing this fact and managed to get an order of anticipatory bail in their favour. The matter is so serious that no other order can be passed then cancelling the order granting anticipatory bail to these three opposite parties namely, Deo Dhari Das, Pashupati Nath Pandey and Someshawar Nath Pandey by order dated 10.12.2009. Their bail bond has earlier been directed to be cancelled. The Court below will take necessary action against these opposite parties for making false statement for suppressing the real fact and the concerned Court will take necessary action as provided under the law. Anand Kr. (Mridula Mishra, J.)