Patna High Court MJC No.1554 of 2011 (6) dt.16-01-2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No 1554 of 2011 ====================================================== Satyendra Kumar Sinha .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH ORAL ORDER 6 16-01-2014 Regarding Office Note dated 15.01.2014 The Office Note is thoroughly misconceived and shows non-application of mind by the Registry. By order dated 21.12.2011 passed in MJC No 1554 of 2011 (the present MJC), which was filed for restoration of Civil Review No 142 of 2010 which stood dismissed for default because of non-compliance of order dated 14.01.2011, Civil Review was restored. Thus, this restoration application stood disposed of. While disposing of the restoration application, it was observed that petitioner must comply with order dated 14.01.2011 as passed in Civil Review No 142 of 2010 by 23rd of December, 2011. Accordingly, in the said Civil Review, the application at Flag Z was rightly filed. I failed to understand how the same has been put in this file. Let it be taken out and place with the records of Civil Review No 142 of 2010. Nothing more is to be done by the petitioner. M.E.H./- (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J)