IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY THE FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND SIX : PRESENT : THE HON’BLE SRI.JUSTICE : N.V.RAMANA CRIMINAL PETITION NOS.5324 OF 2002 & 34 OF 2004 CRL.P.NO. 5324/02 : Between: Peddi Chandra Mouli S/o Mallesham. .. Petitioner And 1.Circle Inspector of Police, Siddipet Town, District Medak. 2.Sub Inspector of Police, Siddipet-II Town P.S., Siddipet, District Medak. Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. .. Respondents Petition under Section 482 of Crl.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein, the High Court will be pleased to quash the proceedings in Crime No.134 of 1997 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate at Siddipet, District Medak. CRL.P.NO.34/04 : Between: Gattu Narsimulu S/o Shankaraiah .. Petitioner/Accused No.2 And 1.Circle Inspector of Police, Siddipet Town, District Medak. 2.Sub Inspector of Police, Siddipet-II Town P.S., Siddipet, District Medak. Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. 3.Bukka Srinivas S/o Galaiah R/o Market Area, Siddipet, Medak District. .. Respondents Petition under Section 482 of Crl.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein, the High Court will be pleased to quash the proceedings in Crime No.134 of 1997 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate at Siddipet, District Medak. These Petitions coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petitions and the grounds filed herein and the order of the High Court dated 19.11.2002 made in Crl.MP No.7306 of 2002 made in Crl.P.No.5324 of 2002 and upon hearing the arguments of Sri G. Anandam, Advocate for the Petitioners in both the petitioners, the Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondents 1 & 2 in both the petitions and of Sri K. Govind, Advocate for Respondent No.3 in Crl.P.No.34 of 2004. :: 2 :: THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER : “When the matter is taken up, learned Counsel for petitioner submitted that police officials had investigated the matter and filed a final report dated 31.01.1998 and basing on the same, the case was closed and that the police wants to reopen the case which was already closed. On the other hand, learned counsel for complainant/third respondent has disputed the said statement and stated that no report was filed in the Court. In the above circumstances, the Registry is directed to call for a report from the concerned Magistrate as regards filing of final report dated 31.01.1998 and the records relating to Crime No.134 of 1997 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate at Siddipet, Medak District. List the matter after two weeks.” ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1.The Judicial First Class Magistrate at Siddipet, Medak District.(BY SPEED POST) 2.The Circle Inspector of Police, Siddipet Town, District Medak. 3.The Sub Inspector of Police, Siddipet-II, Town P.S., Siddipet, District Medak. 4.Bukka Srinivas S/o Galaiah R/o Market Area, Siddipet, Medak District. 5.Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P.,Hyderabad.(OUT) 6.The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad. 7.One spare copy. H.A. DRAFTED BY : H.A. DATED : 06.04.06 APPROVED BY : HIGH COURT NVRJ DATED :05.04.2006 NOTE : LIST THE MATTER AFTER TWO WEEKS. ORDER : CRL.P NOS.5324/02 & 34/04 DIRECTION