1 (Spl. - H.C.A.S. C.D., 78-e) FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA PANAJI – GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 197 OF 2004 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Quorum appearances, Court's orders, or directions and Court's or Judge's Orders. Registrar's orders. Mr. A.D. Bhobe, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, Advocate General with Mr. P.A. Kamat, Govt. Advocate for respondent No.1. Miss. S. Linhares, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. S.D. Padiyar, Advocate for respondent No.3. Mr. S.R. Rivonkar, Advocate for respondent No.4(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f) and (g). CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & N.A. BRITTO, JJ. DATE : 18TH OCTOBER, 2004. P.C. We have heard Mr. Bhobe, the learned Advocate for the petitioners and we have perused the affidavit-in- reply filed by the Chief Officer, Margao Municipal Council. 2 2. It is evident that the authorities concerned have taken cognizance of the complaint dated 30th September, 2003 submitted by the petitioners and the South Goa Planning and Development Authority, as well as the Margao Municipal Council have initiated proceedings against the concerned respondents. 3. We direct that these proceedings be concluded as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of two months, after hearing all the parties concerned and as per law. The petition is disposed of accordingly. B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. N.A. BRITTO, J. ssm.