IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 3RD AUGUST 2009 / 12TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 14014 of 2007(R) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- M.G.PAPPU, S/O.GOVINDAN, AGED 51 YEARS, MAREKADAN HOUSE, YORSHANAPURAM, MANGALATHARA, ANGAMALY, ERNAKULAM. BY ADVS.MR.RAJIT, MR.RANJIT BABU. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (REVENUE RECOVERY), O/O. TAHSILDAR, ALUVA. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MATTOOR VILLAGE, MATTOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. P.K.SANTHA, W/O.PAPPU, AGED 41 YEARS, PULICKAL HOUSE, PULIYANAM P.O., ANGAMALY. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. SMITHA SUKUMARAN, R3 BY ADVS. MR.S.SUDHISH KUMAR, MR.K.B.DAYAL. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/08/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.14014/2007-R: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBIT: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DTD. 29/07/2006 ISSUED BY THE R.1. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: EXT.R3.1: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 18/04/2005 PASSED BY THE FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM IN M.C. NO. 315/2003. EXT.R3.2: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD. 18/04/2005 IN O.P. NO. 1157/2003 PASSED BY THE FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. Prv. S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 14014 of 2007 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 3rd August, 2009. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is challenging revenue recovery proceedings for recovery of amounts awarded by the Family Court, Ernakulam in favour of the 3rd respondent, as maintenance in a matrimonial cause . 2. At the time of admission, this Court passed the following interim order on 27-4-2007: “Notice and interim stay of proceedings pursuant Ext. P1 for a period of two months on condition that the petitioner deposits for payment to the 3rd respondent a sum of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand only) within a period of two weeks from today.” There was a further order on 19-6-2007 as follows: “There will be an interim direction to the Family Court, Ernakulam to release the amount deposited by the petitioner to the 3rd respondent, immediately on production of a copy of this order.” In view of those interim orders, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed with liberty to the parties to take up all their contentions in the case pending before the Family Court. S/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/