THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 21268 of 2005 Between: Smt. P. Sakuntala W/o. Late Venkat, Nizamabad District, ..... PETITIONER AND 1.The Circle Inspector of Police, Madnoor, Nizamabad District and others. ..RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 21268 of 2005 ORDER: ( Per the Hon’ble Smt Justice T.Meena Kumari) Seeking a direction to call for the records and remarks from respondents 1 to 5 in regard to (1) petitioner’s inheritance of her husband’s land admeasuring Ac.9-10 guntas in S.No.108 of Nimbur village (ii) Conspiracy of one Sri Ganga Ram, MLA of Congress Party r/o Pedda Kodapgal, Sudershan reddy, Patwari of Nimbur village, Bhagawan Shetty of Erragadda, Hyderabad and Basava Raju, r/o Prabhakar Reddy Nagar, Hyderabad, to provide possession of the petitioner’s land to her mother in law and their recording some video clippings against the petitioner and to provide protection to the property of the petitioner from the above said persons, the writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner. In pursuance of the orders of a Division Bench of this Court dated 7.10.2005, the Superintendent of Police Mr.Mahesh Chandra Laddha is present before this Court and has filed the counter-affidavit. A perusal of the counter-affidavit goes to show that the investigation into the matter disclosed that the dispute in question is civil in nature. The learned Government Pleader for Home submits that the writ petition does not survive for adjudication as the dispute in question is purely of civil in nature. In view of the averments made in the counter affidavit and in view of the submission of the learned Government Pleader for Home, to the effect that the writ petition does not survive for adjudication as it pertains to civil dispute, we feel that no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. However, we feel it appropriate to direct the official respondents not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioner, without following the due process of law. With the above observation, writ petition is closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI ____________________ JUSTICE K.C.BHANU 24.10.2005 rkk