Crl. Misc. No.M-37856 of 2010 ::1:: IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-37856 of 2010 Date of decision: 03.02.2011 Sumit Bhasin and others .. Petitioners Versus State of Haryana .. Respondent Present:- Mr.Parminder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Harmeet Singh Deol, Addl. A.G., Haryana. * * * * S.S. SARON, J. In compliance to the order dated 24.01.2011, the Superintendent of Police, Karnal, is present. It is submitted that the complainant has been examined by a radiologist and injury No.4 on the head of the complainant was subject to X-ray examination. The doctor at the Tagore Hospital and Kidney Stone Centre, 27/14-Sector, Karnal has mentioned; “no fracture seen, soft tissue swelling seen in left parital region indicating of soft tissue injury”. Therefore, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the State that the said injury is simple in nature. At the time of motion hearing on 23.12.2010, petitioners No.1 and 3 were granted interim bail. However, in view of the injury with danda blow is attributed to petitioner No.2, he was not granted the concession of interim bail as the medical evidence was to be seen. Now the State itself states that the said injury attributed Crl. Misc. No.M-37856 of 2010 ::2:: to petitioner No.2 is simple in nature. It is also stated that custody of petitioner No.2 is not required for the purposes of investigation. In the circumstances, the interim bail granted to petitioners No.1 and 3 vide order dated 23.12.2010 is made absolute. Besides, Amit Bhasin (petitioner No.2), in the event of his arrest, shall be admitted to interim bail on his furnishing personal bond and surety to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. Petitioner No.2 shall join investigation as and when called and shall abide by the conditions of Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The criminal miscellaneous petition stands disposed of. (S.S. SARON) February 03, 2011 JUDGE sukhpreet