A? HIGH COURT OF CHHATI‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR w.p. no. 1330/2001 PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS 1. Vs. 1. Dilip Pansan', S/o. Lakhanlal Pansari, aged 38 yam. Pradeep Pansari, S/o. Lakhanla] Pansari, aged 36 yams (Both r/o. New Bus Stand, Raipur (CG) State of Chhattisgarh, through Sscretaw, Dsp& ant of Wa s1" Resources, D.K. Building, Raipur Canal Deputy CollectorIAdditional Tehsildar, Water Resources Division N0. 1, Raipur Municipal Corporation, Raipur, through its Commissioner, Municipal Coxporation Building, Raipur (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 2261227 OF THE CONSTITUTIGN OF INDIA (s3: Hon'ble Mr. satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Shri Shashank Thakur, counsel for the petitioners. Shri S.K.Mishra, Panel Lawyer for the State. (Passed on this 24th day of October, 2007) GREER Learned counsel appealing for the petitioners submits that with the passage oftime, the petition has become infructuous. Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents has no objection to the above submission. In View of the above, the writ petition is dismissed, as having become innuctuous. Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge