IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.535/3008 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes,Office Memoranda of Coam Appearances,Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s order --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Ashok Tajane for the applicant Mr.Kharge,APP for State Mr.Ashutosh Kulkarni for respondent CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J. DATE : 6th October,2009 P.C. . The matter is wrongly shown on board. Learned counsel for both the parties are present. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant points out that correction in para 1 of the order dated 1/10/2009 is to be made in the last line. It is wrongly mentioned as‘revision application is filed by the applicant/husband for reducing the amount of maintenance’ and it should be corrected as ‘for quashing the order of maintenance’. The last line para -1 of order dated 1/10/2009 is corrected and it should be read as - “ Hence this Revision Application is filed by the applicant/husband for quashing the order of maintenance”. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.)