IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.660 OF 2004. APPEAL NO.660 OF 2004. APPEAL NO.660 OF 2004. Mahadeo Tamanna Bagdure. ... Appellant. Versus. Mallikarjun Tamanna Bagdure. ... Respondents. Shri Nitin Jamdar for the Appellant. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 3rd August, 2006. : 3rd August, 2006. : 3rd August, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Shri Jamdar for the Appellant. The Courts below have recorded a concurrent finding of fact that the Appellant/Defendant has failed to prove the existence of nucleus. The Courts below have, therefore, recorded a concurrent finding that the Plaintiff has proved that the suit property is the self acquired property. In view of the concurrent finding of facts, no substantial question of law arises. Second Appeal is dismissed. Judge. Judge. Judge.