CW 10757/08 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Civil Writ Petition No.10757/2008 Ajay Pratap Singh Versus University of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order ::: 20/04/09 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Mahendra S.Gurjar, for petitioner Dr. YC Sharma, for respondent University Instant petition has been filed with the grievance that respondents have withheld result of LL.B.(2nd Yr) in which petitioner appeared in academic session 2006-07. It appears from record that petitioner was declared failed in three papers viz. (a) 9021- Jurisprudence; (b) 9029-Insurance Law; & (c) 9031- Prac. Written Paper-Prof. Ethics, of LL.B. (2nd Yr) (Academic) (New Scheme) Examination June, 2005 as is evident from mark sheet of Roll No.15182 (Ann.2)- obviously examination form was filled up by him to appear in papers in which he appeared and failed. However after being admitted in 3rd year LL.B. as against due paper-9031-Prac.Written Paper-Prof.Ethics, petitioner appeared in paper 9027-Administrative Law in 2nd Year (Acad.) (New Sch.) Exam. May-2006, and secured 51 marks in paper-9027-Administrative law in the result declared on 30/09/06 vide mark sheet (Ann.4). Thereafter it came to the notice of CW 10757/08 //2// respondent-University that petitioner never filled up examination form to appear in due paper-9027-of Administrative law of 2nd year LL.B., and this fact was concealed by petitioner and because of human error, result was declared on 30/09/06 vide mark sheet (Ann.4), for which after notice being served upon, he was informed to submit original mark sheet (Ann.4) so as to declare result of other due papers in which he appeared at a later stage. Obviously on the basis of his result, if there are due papers, he would get opportunity to appear therein, if permissible under law. This fact has not been controverted by petitioner that he never filled up examination form to appear in paper 9027-Administrative Law and if that be so, it was certainly human error which the University committed in declaring result thereof. In these circumstances, decision of respondent University to call upon petitioner to furnish original mark sheet (Ann.4) so that fresh mark sheet be issued to him of 2nd year LL.B. (Acad.) as per provisions of law, which in the opinion of this Court cannot be said to be faulted. Consequently, writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed with the observations that if petitioner deposits/submits original mark sheet (Ann.4) of LL.B. (2nd Yr) (Acad.) (New Sch) Exam- CW 10757/08 //3// May, 2006 pertaining to his 3rd attempt, within three weeks, respondent University may declare result of petitioner in accordance with law within two weeks of his submission of original mark sheet and as per his result, if he fails, he may be provided further attempt, if permissible under law. No order as to costs. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p3/10757CW08Apr20UOR.doc