IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41246 of 2010 KAMAL KUMAR GUPTA @ KAMAL KISHORE GUPTA@ Banti Gupta son of Krishnakumar Gupta, Resident of Grand Squire (Barrack) Danapur, P.S. Danapur in the District of Patna. ……………………….. Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR …………………….. Opposite Party. ----------- 2 18.11.2010 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Danapur P.S Case No. 227 of 2010 for offence punishable under Sections 386, 414/34 of the Indian Penal code. Taking into consideration the submissions of learned counsel that the implication of the petitioner in present case is on the basis of confession of co-accused who was apprehended at the place of occurrence, namely, Chandan Deo Burman @ Bintu and who himself has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. Case No. 38470 of 2010 vide order passed on 10.11.2010, let the petitioner, Kamal Kishore Gupta @ Banti Gupta be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur in 2 connection with Danapur P.S. Case No.227 of 2010. subject to following conditions : 1. That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the father of the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. 2. That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse. 3. That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons 3 of misuse. 4. That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Prakash (Jyoti Saran, J.)