In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated: 11.04.2007 Coram: The Honourable Mr.Justice P.SATHASIVAM and The Honourable Mr.Justice S.TAMILVANAN Writ Petition No.14526 of 2006 1.Chinnai Yellamanda Chetty Anjaneyalu Chetty Charities, rep. by its Managing Trustee C.Nagarajan, No.156, Rassappa Chetty Street, Chennai-600 001. 2.C.Subang 3.Sindhuri 4.C.Sadvi 5.A.Swarupini 6.N.Sugandhi 7.S.Nagamani 8.N.Manjari 9.C.Chandan all rep. By their Power of Attorney Agent Mehul H.Doshi. .. Petitioners ..vs.. 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by the Commissioner and Secretary to Government, Housing & Urban Development Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009. 2. The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Thalamuthu Natarajan Building, 8, Gandhi Irwin Road, Chennai-600 008. 3.The Managing Director, Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply & Sewerage Board, Chennai-2. .. Respondents https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the second respondent in its letter dated 09.05.2006 bearing No.BC1/14256/2005 and quash the said proceedings so far as it imposes the condition to remit a sum of Rs.4,20,000/- as security deposit and Rs.5,37,000/- as Water supply & Sewerage Infrastructure Improvement charges as condition precedent for the issuance of planning permission for the proposed construction of 2 blocks of Stilt + 4 floors, residential buildings with 64 dwelling units at old No.72, New No.95, Mc Nichols Road, Chetpet, Chennai-31 in R.S.No.381/1, 381/5 and 381/6, Block No.24 of Egmore Village and consequently, direct the second respondent to grant planning permission without insisting on the payment of the same. For Petitioner : Mr. A.R.Karunakaran For 2nd Respondent : Mr.J.Ravindran For respondents 1 & 3 : Mr.K.Elango, Spl. Govt. Pleader ORDER (Order of the Court was made by P.SATHASIVAM,J.) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the above writ petition. He also made an endorsement to that effect in the writ petition. 2. Accordingly, permission is granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, it is made clear that the petitioner is free to challenge the provisions contained in Rule 19(b)(III)-(B) of the Development Control Rules, if need arises, at the appropriate time. No costs. Sd/- Asst. Registrar. /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar. raa https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ To 1. The Commissioner and Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Housing & Urban Development Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009. 2. The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Thalamuthu Natarajan Building, 8, Gandhi Irwin Road, Chennai-600 008. 3.The Managing Director, Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply & Sewerage Board, Chennai-2. W. P. No.14526 OF 2006 akr[co] Gp/18.4 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/