IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4105 of 2011 Daya Nand Rai, S/O-Umesh Rai Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 04 12.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 25.03.2010 on the charges that he opened fire on the informant causing fire arm injury on his chest which has been found grievous in nature but submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the alleged occurrence took place on account of land dispute and now the case has already been committed to the court of Sessions which is evident from report of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Begusarai. It is further contended by him that although, the prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected by this Court vide order dated 22.09.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 34605 of 2010 but there is no possibility of disposal of the case of the petitioner in near future. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai/trial court in connection with Begusarai Muffasil P.S. Case No. 112 of 2010 subject to condition that petitioner shall attend the trial court on each and every date in person for the period of nine months and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates without any genuine cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. Furthermore, if in course of trial any complaint in respect of tampering of the prosecution witnesses is made and if the complaint is found genuine after due enquiry by the concerned court, the concerned court shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)