IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.14077 of 2011 Date of Decision.04.08.2011 Kailash s/o Ram Sarup and others .....Petitioners Versus The State of Haryan through the Chief Secretary, Haryana Government, Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Rajneesh Chadwal, Advocate for the petitioners. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he will be satisfied if the legal notice (Annexure P-4), which has been issued on behalf of the petitioners is considered by respondent No.3 and appropriate decision is taken within a particular time. 2. The legal notice will be be decided by respondent No.3, if the same is represented again along with copy of this order, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of legal notice. 3. The writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission, dispensing with notice to the respondents. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 04, 2011 Pankaj*