IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45722 of 2008 1. TUNTUN SAH 2. KAMAL NARAYAN SAHU @ KABAL SAH 3. PARMESHWAR SAHU 4. JAGDISH SAH 5. JAY NANDAN SAH @ JEAY SAH 6. HARI NANDAN SAH @ HARI SAH 7. BINDESHWAR SAH 8. CHANDESHWAR SAH 9. YUGAL KISHORE @ JUGAL SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a complaint case under section 364 and other provisions of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits from the allegations themselves that the parties are neighbours and there is a serious land dispute between them. It is submitted that the allegations of abduction is frivolous as the son of the complainant had gone out of the State for employment and had subsequently returned to the village. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, abovenamed surrender in the court below within four weeks from today, when they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of SDJM, Supaul in complaint case no.408 (c) /04. hr ( Navin Sinha )