IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 10973 of 2008 Decided on: 24.12.2010 Dolma Devi …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner : Mr. Vipin Potyaan, Advocate vice counsel. For the respondents : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Additional Advocate General, with Mr. Anil Jaswal, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 3. None for respondents No. 4 and 5. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. Vipin Potyaan, learned vice counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to the intervening developments. Consequently, the petition is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge December 24, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No