IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 534 of 2008 Ratan Lal S/o Sri Kundan Lal ......... Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ......... Respondents Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. None for respondent No.3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. None for respondent No.3. 2. Shri B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioner has now become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case submitted the final report against the petitioner before the Court concerned on 22/06/2008. This fact has been indicated in para 2 of the short counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. CLMA No. 4286 of 2008 stands disposed of accordingly. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 11.12.2008 Shiv