^ ,^'- 1 i^iu Petitioner Respondents HiGHCOURTOFCHmTTISGARH:BILASPUR WritPetnion (Sl No. 3014 of2088 Raj KumarTiwari, S/o. Qanga PrasadTiwari, , aged about % .years, r/o. Shastri Nagar, Gal!) No.5, New Sartenda, Bilaspur, BitaspurDisfc, CG State. , Versus 1) State of Chhattisgarh through Secretaiy, Water Resouroes Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur, DtsS.CG State. ^ 2) Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Bilaspur, CG State. (Writ Petition under Artiole226 ofthe Constitution of India) SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agmhotri, J. Presenfc Shri K.R. Nair, oounsei for the petitioner. .Shri Y.8. Thakur, Deputy Advocate GeneFal for.the State. ORALORDER (Passed on %n day vfjvme, 2008) .With consent of leamed counset appearing for both tfte parties, the matter Is heard finally.: 2) .Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioher submits that one Ramachanda Kurup, similarly situated employee had filed a vwit petition beirig Writ Petltlon No. 670 of 2004, wherein thls Court afterconsidering ttiefacts ofthe.case granted libertytolhe petitioner to make a detailed repfesentation to the competent authority oflhe respondents. The competent authority of the respondents, In turn, was directed to deoide thecase pf t.he petitioner on its own merlt, inaccordance with t»v,as rarly as •pbssible preierably within a period of three months froiD the date of reeeipt of the representatipn.It is fyrther submitted thait seyeral otberperearis have alse approachai this Gourt In.like manner arKl onfrieir Fepresentattonsthecompetentauttiofity ofthe respondents has granted teilef. Further, the competent authoFlty of the'eespondents |has dedined to grant any relief to those persons, who had not approa^ied tothis -Court. . - - 3) In the light of the above submission, the petlttonw is granted tiberty to maNe a detailed represeritation to. the competent authorlty: of the respondents. On such representation beingfiledby the petitioneT,the competentatrihbfityoftheresponda-its, shall ccirisider and deoide the same on Its own merit, in aecoridance with tew, as earty as possjble, preferably within a period of two months ftom the date of reeeipt. oflthe irepresenSation. . . :: |4) Thepetltionisaccordinglydisppsedof.Noorderastooosts ; ' • Sd/- Satish&Agnihom Judge