IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 26TH MARCH 2010 / 5TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 10399 of 2010(Y) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- SILBI GEORGE, W/O.P.V.GEORGE, AGED 37 YEARS, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, CHERUPUSHPA U.P. SCHOOL, P.O.CHANDANAKKAMPARA, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS. MR.V.A.MUHAMMED MR.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, TRIVANDRUM – 14. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KASARAGODE, POST VIDHYA NAGAR, KASARAGODE DISTRICT. 4. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, IRIKKUR, P.O.IRITTY, KANNUR DISTRICT. 5. THE MANAGER, CHERUPUSHAP U.P. SCHOOL, CHANDANAKKAMPARA, P.O.CHANDANAMKKAMPARA, KANNUR DISTRICT. GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.T.T.MAHAMMOOD. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J ---------------------- W.P.(C.) No.10399 of 2010 --------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of March 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a UPSA in the 5th respondent school. But the appointment of the petitioner has not been approved. The Manager has filed Ext.P3 before the 2nd respondent and the petitioner has filed Ext.P5 before the 1st respondent. The petitioner seeks disposal of the same. 2. I am of opinion that, it is more appropriate that the 2nd respondent should first consider Ext.P3. In the above circumstances, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as 5th respondent as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Jvt