n 2. (H} (@ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.iS}No^ ^3^£_ (20io PETITIONERS .^:"'':^'~';%r--. ^//^ .?y 4^ ^/ ^rw ^^cyy ^iy y/ /" 1] Rajendra Kumar Tiwari, S/o. Late S.L. Tiwari, aged about 50 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Kapan, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 2] ^ Sunil Kumar Kaushik, S/o. N.P. Kaushik, aged about 41 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Tarbahar, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3] / Prashant Konher, S/o. S. Konher, aged about 42 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. High School, Hardikala, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4] ^ Mansukhdas Sahu, S/o. Brijlal Sahu, aged about 46 years, Head Master, Govt. Primary SchoQl, Mundatola, Dondilohara, District Durg (C.G.) 5] ^- Ishwari Kumar Venna, S/o. Ayodhya Prasad Verma, aged about 61 years, Headmaster, Govt. Middle School, Sakra, Block Dhamdha, District Durg (C.G.) ^ 6] ^ Chetanlal Verma, S/o. Awadhram Verma, aged about 56 years, Upper" Divisiori Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Bijalinagar, Bhilai 13, District Durg (C.G.) 7] Smt. Sarojbala Madhariya, W/o. Sanad Kumar Madhariya, aged about 48 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Umda, District Durg (C.G.) 8j Ramesh Kumar Dubey, S/o. Shivlal Dubey, aged about 46 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Kopra, District Bilaspur (C.G.) l^^ 9] Munendra Sharma, S/o. Yadunaadan Prasad Sharma, aged about 48 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Sakari, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 10] Ashwini Mishra, S/o. Late- P.P. Mishra, aged about 49 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Lalbahadur Shashtri, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 11] Smt. Aparna Sharma, W/o. Prashant Sharma, aged about 42 years, Upper Division Teacher, Higher Secondary School, Sakari, Block Takhatpur, Distriet Bilaspur_(C,G.) , 12] Radheshyam Sahu, S/o. Bisheshardas Sahu, aged about 40 years, Headmaster, Govt. Primary S-chool, Netamtola, Dondilohara, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS 1] State of Chhattisgarh, through: Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur; District Raipur (C.G.) 2] Director, Public Instructions Direetorate, Peasion Bada, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 3] Professional Examination Board, Chhattisgarh, through: its Secretary, Professional Examination Board, Chhattisgarh, Pension Bada, Raipur (C.G.) 4] Exam Controller, Professional Examination Board, Chhattisgarh, Pension Bada, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA RESPONDENTS ['w R? HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.5708 OF 2010 Petitioners Rajendra Others Kumar Tiwari & Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & Others. (Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri A.V. Sridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 13th day ofJanuary, 2011) 1. By this petition, the petitioners seek following relief:- 10. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions and the respondent No.3 & 4 may kindly be directed to declare the result of departmental limited examination held on 25.10.2009 in pursuance of the advertisement dated 11.09.2009 (Annex.P-2) for promotion on the post of Lecturers and the respondent No.1 & 2 may kindly be directed to consider the cases of the petitioners for promotion on the post of Lecturers on the basis of.merit list of selected candidates of each subject issued by the respondent No.3 & 4. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records from the possession ofthe respondents. 10.3 That, this Honb'e Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief(s), which is deemed fit and proper in the aforesaid facts and circumstances ofthe case. 2. Shri Paranjpe, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the result of departmental limited examination held on 25/10/2009 in pursuance of Jhe advertisement dated 11/09/2009 (Annexure P/2), has already been declared. Thus, first part of the prayer has becomeinfructuous. With regard to . •'•:"s-s:'»jt, -,^/s' .^r '^.••c^ the consideration of the cases for promotion, it is the case ofthe State/respondents that the same is under verification. 3. Shri Sridhar, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State submits that on verification, the cases for promotion on the basis of result and subject to further verification would be issued as expeditiously as possible. 4. In view of foregoing, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication at this stage and the petition has become infructuous. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Arun