IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11680 of 2010 1. LALIT MOHAN KUMAR S/O SRI LALAN SINGH R/O VILL HASANPUR, P.S.CHAKAND, DISTT-GAYA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. COMMISSIONER MAGADH DIVISION, GAYA 3. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE GAYA 4. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION GAYA 5. DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER GAYA 6. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER CITY BLOCK, GAYA 7. DISTRICT TEACHER EMPLOYMENT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL GAYA ----------- 2 8.9.2010 The petitioner seeks appointment as Shiksha Mitra. In the selection process, which was carried out in 2003, he states that having not been selected, he represented to the authority and it was found that he was wrongly not selected. Ultimately, he came to this Court and this Court permitted the petitioner to move the tribunal, which was constituted in the year 2009.The tribunal, it is submited, found in favour of the petitioner but refused to order selection of the petitioner on the ground that the matter had longer been delayed and the tribunal would not now order the selection of the petitioner . Having perused the order and heard learned counsel for the petitioner, I find no infirmity in the order of the tribunal requiring interference of this Court. Let it be noted that the selection process was completed in the year 2003.The petitioner had statutory remedy, which he did not avail. He gave administrative application. The selection to the post of Shiksha Mitra was contractual for eleven 2 months and renewal thereafter. Ultimately, in 2006, people working as Shiksha Mitra, on contractual basis, were absorbed as Panchayat Teachers. For the vacancy, there was fresh advertisement and selection process was carried out. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter and the application is accordingly dismissed. singh ( Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)