IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5362 of 2005 AMARENDRA KUMAR SINHA, son of Shri Raj Mohan Prasad, resident of Village – Dhobdihan, P S – Nasariganj, District – Rohtas. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Commissioner, Patna Division, Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Collector, Rohtas at Sasaram. 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Bikramganj, District – Rohtas. ----------- 03. 25.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is seeking a direction upon the respondents to regularize his service as he has been continuously working as copyist clerk in certified copy section of Bikramgnaj Sub-Division since 26.8.1984. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that many other persons similarly situated and even juniors have been regularized but petitioner’s case has not been considered. The stand of the respondents in the counter affidavit is that after August, 2001 no work has been taken from the petitioner and to that extent his claim seems to be misplaced. Though no supplementary affidavit has been filed annexing certain materials which were produced before this Court that work is still being taken from the petitioner but these are matters of verification by the concerned authority. Let the petitioner file an application along with the materials which were produced before this Court to show that he is still continuing to work in whatever capacity under the respondents and the District Magistrate, Rohtas will also consider the issue from this angle 2 whether the petitioner has been discriminated in matter of regularization vis-à-vis some other juniors. Petitioner will file such an application within four weeks and the decision will be taken after verification within six months from the date such an application is filed. The writ application stands disposed of with a direction as above. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)