IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN THURSDAY, THE 12TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 23RD MAGHA 1930 WA.No. 242 of 2009(E) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).18012/2008 DATED 20/06/2008 .................... APPELLANT/ PETITIONER: -------------------------------------- K.PARAMESWARAKURUP,S/O.KUNJAN NAIR, SURABHI, K.R.PURAM P.O.CHERTHALA. BY ADV. MR.BABU CHERUKARA. RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENTS: ---------------------------------------------- 1. VICE CHAIRMAN, KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES BOARD, TRIVANDRUM. 2. KHADI & VILLAGE INDUSTRIES BOARD, TRIVANDRUM, REPRESENTED BY IT'S SECRETARY. R1 & R2 BY MR. K.P. HAREESH, S.C. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/02/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. J.B. Koshy,Ag.C.J. & P. Bhavadasan, J. ---------------------------------------- W.A. No. 242 of 2009 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of February, 2009 Judgment Koshy, Ag.C.J. Writ petitioner was faced with revenue recovery proceedings for recovery of the loan taken by him from the second respondent Board. It is the case of the petitioner that even though an amount of Rupees Ten lakhs was sanctioned as loan, an amount of Rs.7,86,865/- was credited to the bank account as per Ext.P1. Rs.2,83,000/- was given for supply of machinery to the petitioner. Thus, total loan amount is Rupees Ten lakhs. Now, the demand is for Rs.22 lakhs more than the principal amount. When the case came up for hearing, an interim stay was granted provided petitioner should pay Rupees Five lakhs as a condition precedent. That was not paid. Writ petition was dismissed. The only contention now raised by the petitioner is that he filed an application to the Board for one time settlement. Learned counsel for the second respondent submits that it is very difficult to consider the application for one time settlement on the facts of this case and also the conduct the petitioner. Petitioner filed Ext.P2 representation. W.A. No.242/2009 2 Second respondent is directed to consider Ext.P2 and dispose of the same according to law as expeditiously as possible, in any event, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ appeal is disposed of. J.B.Koshy Acting Chief Justice P. Bhavadasan Judge vaa