HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker Writ Petition (S! No. 4260/201 1 Rajendra Markande Versus Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Limited and others 'RESPONDENT§ $hri A.N. Bhakta counsel for the petitioner Shri Sunil Otwani counsel for the respondents WRTI PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF lNDlA O R D E R (25.08.2011) Grievance of the petitioner in this case is that when he was working as Lineman Class H and posted at City Division (West), Biiaspur, he was punished vide order dated 21.6.2010 by the Executive Engineer (City) Division 2, CSPDL, Bilaspur by stopping two increments Q. for one year with non—cumulative effect. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner has preferred an appeal on 23.7.2010 before the Superintending Engineer through Sub Engineer Farsabahar, District Jashpur, but the same has not been decided till date. 3. Counsel for the respondents submits that memo of appeal (Annexure P-1) has never been received in the office of Superintending Engineer (Urban) Bilaspur and therefore question of keeping the same pending by it does not arise. According to him, the petition is liable to be dismissed. 4. At this stage, counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to file a fresh appeal before respondent No.2 within a period of three weeks from today and a direction may be issued to it to decide the same ignoring the point of limitation. mu W2,— ' 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to me fresh appeal before respondent No.2 and on this being done the respondent No.2 shall decide the same in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of its filing, ignoring the point of limitation.“ ” Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge