IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.3230 -M of 2011 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : SEPTEMBER 14, 2011 ALBINDER SINGH ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS JASWINDER SINGH .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. ADS Sukhija, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Siddharath Gupta, Advocate, for respondent. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 Vide order dated 10.2.2011, the petitioner was directed to surrender before the trial court within a period of 3 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order. It was further directed that, in case, the petitioner surrenders and submits a draft of the amount in dispute along with simple interest in the name of the complainant, he shall be released on bail by the trial court, on his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to its satisfaction. The petitioner was further burdened with costs of ` 15,000/-, to be deposited in Punjab State Legal Services Authority. 2 The needful was not done and, therefore, vide order dated 15.3.2011, it was directed that order passed by this Court on 10.2.2011 was modified with regard to extension of time only Criminal Misc. No.3230 -M of 2011 (O&M) 2 and other part of the order would remain the same. The petitioner was directed to surrender before the trial court within a period of one week from the date of passing of the order viz. 15.3.2011. 3 Till date neither the draft, as directed vide order dated 10.2.1011, has been deposited in the trial court, nor even the petitioner has surrendered. 4 The conduct of the petitioner clearly indicates that the petitioner has no regard for process of law. The orders passed by this Court have been disobeyed and disregarded with impunity. In such circumstances, no indulgence can be shown in favour of the petitioner in exercise of jurisdiction under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure. 5 The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. 6 The Magistrate is directed to ensure speedy proceedings. September 14, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?