1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 290/2010. ( Abdul Rauf Sk. Ismail -: versus :- Ramkisan G. Paliwal and others ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JANUARY 19, 2010. Heard Shri A.V. Bhide, learned counsel for petitioner. It is apparent that name of petitioner was wrongly mentioned as Abdul Rauf s/o Sheikh Abdul, but, then it is not in dispute that petitioner appeared in those proceedings, contested the matter and lost. The decree obtained by the respondents is sought to be executed and execution is being opposed by filing separate suit by petitioner. The petitioner is the person affected by that decree and he contested the earlier proceedings, hence no exception can be taken to the impugned order. Learned counsel for petitioner has urged that in the meanwhile petitioner discovered some documents which cast doubt upon title of respondents. The documents were 2 relevant in earlier adjudication and no cognizance of those documents can be taken in the present suit filed by the petitioner. Writ Petition is therefore, dismissed with no order as to cost. JUDGE Rgd.