IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3050 of 2010 DEVI LAL SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR 2 15.3.2010 Let supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner and counter affidavit filed on behalf of the complainant be kept on the record. Heard Mr.K.V.Verma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.Ashok Kumar Choudhary, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant as also Mr.Anand Mohan Mehta, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under sections 420, 447, 468, 471 and 504 of the I.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire dispute is of a civil nature and no criminal offence is made out in the present case. He submits that admittedly some sale deed was executed in favour of the petitioner as far as back in the year, 1977 and he is the owner of the land. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that by including some other lands belonging to the complainant the petitioner executed a deed of titima in the year, 2008 and for which he was not legally authorised. It has also been submitted that after execution of the aforesaid deed of titima the petitioner tried to interfere with the land in question and after that a 2 proceeding under section 144 Cr.P.C. was started between the parties. Be that as it may, in the circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks from today be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., East Champaran, Motihari, in Complaint Case No.217/09 subject to the condition laid down under section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. as also petitioner would be obliged to comply the order of any authority with respect to the dispute over the land in question. AnilKr.Sinha (Birendra Prasad Verma,J.)