1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 5091 of 08 Shri Abhijeet v. Nagpur University and ors ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr Naqeeb A.W. , Advocate for petitioner Dr B.G. Kulkarni, Adv for respondents. Coram : D.D. Sinha and A.P. Bhangale, JJ Dated : 18th March 2009 1. Heard Mr Naqeeb, learned counsel for petitioner and Dr B.G. Kulkarni, learned counsel for respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner is a student of 5th semester of B.E. Petitioner appeared for paper in the subject of Power Electronic. Result of 5th semester was declared and since the petitioner as received 29 marks i.e. less than the expectation of the petitioner in the said subject, petitioner applied for revaluation of marks in the said paper. 2. Dr B.G. Kulkarni has submitted that the Committee considered request of the petitioner and after following due 2 procedure, found that no change is necessary so far as the marks already given by the valuer in the said paper are concerned. Learned counsel for respondents further contended that on scrutiny of the answer-sheet of the petitioner of the said paper, the Assistant Registrar (Revaluation) formed an opinion that there is possibility of mal-practice committed by the petitioner while solving the paper of Power Electronic and, therefore, entire issue is under consideration of the Disciplinary Action Committee and decision in this regard shall be taken by following the principles of natural justice and the same will be communicated to the petitioner. 3. In the circumstances, we are of the view that the petitioner has not made out any case for showing indulgence at this stage. However, we expect the Disciplinary Action Committee to take a decision as to whether the petitioner , as alleged, has committed any mal-practice, on its own merit in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of communication of this order. Judge. Judge. hsj