1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.1605 of 2007 (Ramesh Ramaji Wankar .vs. State & Ors.) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, ap3wpearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CORAM : D.D.Sinha and Mrs. Vasanti A. Naik, JJ. DATE : November 28, 2007. Heard Mrs. M.S.Jawalkar, Adv. for the Petitioner and Mr.Sonak, Assistant Government Pleader for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Present Writ Petition is directed against the order dt. 12.6.2003 passed by the Deputy Director of Education whereby approval in respect of appointment of Mr.Rambhau Sukhdas Tandekar (Peon) came to be rejected in view of reduction of section by the Deputy Director of Education. The following facts are not in dispute : That, in the Academic Session 2002-03, there were three sections and the sanctioned strength of non-teaching staff was two clerks and two peons. However, at a latter point of time, strength of section had gone down from three to two and therefore, the sanctioned strength, so far as the clerks were concerned, was reduced 2 to one. In the meanwhile, the services of Mr. Tandekar were terminated by the Management. He filed appeal before the School Tribunal, which was allowed by School Tribunal and direction was given to the Management to reinstate him. Consequently, the Management reinstated him and the petitioner no.1 was demoted. In the backdrop of the above referred facts, we see no reason to show indulgence since the orders were consistent with the aspect of sanctioned strength of non-teaching staff at the relevant time. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for showing indulgence. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE ssj