1 S.B.CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.109/2008. Om Prakash and Others. VS Krishan Kumar and Others. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.109/2008. Om Prakash and Others. VERSUS Krishan Kumar and Others. 11.05.2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.Virendra Agarwal, for the petitioners. Mr.Ashvin Garg ] Mr.Deshraj ] for the respondents. ***** Heard learned counsel for the parties. The revision petition has been preferred against the order dated 15.07.2008 by which the application submitted by the petitioners-defendants under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. has been dismissed. The learned trial court while dismissing the application has found that the pleas which have been raised can be raised by the defendant in the written statement and in case the pleas are raised, the necessary issues on the same would be framed and decided in accordance with law as the defendant cannot produce any evidence or material with the application under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. and must show from the plain reading of the plaint that it is liable to be rejected on any one of the grounds which is apparent from the plain reading of the plaint. In the facts and circumstances, no exception can be taken to 2 S.B.CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.109/2008. Om Prakash and Others. VS Krishan Kumar and Others. the impugned order. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, I am of the view that the objections may be raised in the written statement and issues framed thereon, the parties would be at liberty to approach the learned trial court by means of an application for deciding the said issues as preliminary issues. In the event of such an application being filed, the learned trial court is expected to decide the same in accordance with law. The revision petition as well as the stay application are accordingly stand disposed of. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.