IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 3523 of 2008 Date of Decision:10.11. 2008 Wassan Sigh etc. ...... Appellants Versus Sulakhan Singh and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.S.K.Mahajan, Advocate for the appellants. **** Ajay Tewari, J. This is an appeal against the concurrent judgments of the Courts below. The respondent-plaintiff had filed a suit claiming that he and his brothers, the appellants No. 1 and 2 had jointly inherited the land from their father Dalip Singh by way of Will dated 24.1.96. The appellants took the plea that in fact subsequently by sale deed dated 1.9.97 Dalip Singh aforementioned sold the land to the appellants and the consideration thereof was that the appellants had given the money for the marriage of the grand children of Dalip Singh. Both the Courts have concurrently held that the aforesaid sale has not been proved. Learned counsel has not been able to persuade me that these findings of facts are so perverse that it cannot be held that they do not arise from the evidence on the record. Consequently this appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE November 10, 2008 sunita