SA No. 36 of 2004 Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J. None Mr. A.S. Rawat, A.A.G. for the State/appellant. Mr. Sharad Sharma, Sr. Advocate for the respondents. Having heard the rival contentions, it transpires that the judgment dated 26.12.2003, as rendered by Additional District Judge, Dehradun, gave rise to two parallel appeals. One of them was second appeal no.39 of 2004, preferred by Swamy Guru Prasad, disciple of Swamy Janardan, who was defendant no.2 in the Original Suit no.41 of 1972. While admitting the second appeal for hearing, a Coordinate Bench of this Court stayed the eviction of the appellant. As has been argued, he is running a school on the land which is almost 300 Nalis at the spot. Against the selfsame judgment, the present second appeal no. 36 of 2004 was preferred by the State, which was defendant no.1 in such original suit. While admitting such second appeal, the Coordinate Bench of this Court passed the order of status quo on the spot. The adverse effect of the status quo order is being interpreted as prohibition of using such land for school purposes, as it was being used earlier, ever since the date of inception of lease, which has been renewed by the State Government up till the year 2023. So, now the modification application has been moved by Swamy Guru Prasad, disciple of Swamy Janardan, who is running Swamy Purnanad Degree College at the spot. In the above situation/ circumstances, the order directing maintenance of status quo, is modified to the effect that Swamy Purnanand Degree College or its authorities, will not feel any obstacle in using the land for the purposes of running the educational institution of Swamy Purnanand Degree College, but at the same time, it shall not utilise that land beyond the terms and conditions of the lease as well as other government orders, issued in this regard from time to time. Modification application (CLMA No. 9964 of 2015) stands disposed of in the above terms. List for arguments in due course. (Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.) 03.12.2015 Ravi