1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY : AURANGABAD BENCH WRIT PETITION NO.6449 OF 2006 Vijaykumar s/o. Gunwantrao Biradar - - Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and others. - - Respondents Shri P. G. Rodge, Advocate for petitioner. Shri N. B. Patil, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for Respondent No.1. Shri V. S. Panpatte, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. Dated : 18th June 2009 ORAL ORDER [ Per NARESH H. PATIL, J. ] 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner was appointed, according to Counsel Shri Rodge, in the year 1993 as Assistant Teacher. He was terminated in the year 1998. Therefore, appeal was filed before the School Tribunal. The appeal came to be dismissed against which Writ Petition bearing No. 5180 of 2001 came to be filed. The matter was compromised between the management and the petitioner. according to the petitioner, and the said compromise is at Exhibit E to the petition. According to the petitioner, he was 2 reinstated in the year 2002. Management submitted a proposal in favour of the petitioner before Respondent No.2. 3. Counsel for the Management submits that petitioner is not working in the school since the year 2006. According to Counsel for petitioner, petitioner is working in the school. In view of these disputed questions of facts and the issues raised in the petition, we find that no interference is called for in the extra ordinary writ jurisdiction. Petition is dismissed. If the petitioner has grievance, he may resort to appropriate remedy. ( N. D. DESHPANDE, J. ) ( NARESH H. PATIL, J. ) pnk/wp644906