1 cp375.09 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 375 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5520 OF 1999 [ Vijay Rajendra Patil vs. Dharmaji Sonkawade & Ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. P.V. Suryawanshi, Advocate h/f Mr. S.R. Barlinge, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. V.D. Gunale, Advocate for Resp.Nos.1&2. Mr. D.V. Tele, AGP for State. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 16TH JUNE, 2011 PER COURT : Heard learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner. Learned Counsel for the petitioner requested for adjournment on 08-06-2011. On his request, the matter was kept today for hearing. When the matter was called out in first round, learned Counsel for the petitioner requested for keeping back the matter. Accordingly, the 2 cp375.09 matter is kept back and in second round, when the matter is called out, he prayed for an adjournment. It is highly unacceptable. 2. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondents makes a categorical statement that all the directions given in Para-10 of the order dated 17-12-2008 have been complied with by the respondents. 3. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner is entitled for the salary of Rs.9,81,000/- and some odd amount, he received only Rs.6,70,000/-. Therefore, directions are not complied with. In my opinion, this Court has not stated anywhere in the direction that particular amount should be paid towards arrears of salary. Since the directions are complied with by the respondents, this contempt petition 3 cp375.09 stands disposed of. Notice stands discharged. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the calculation of the arrears of salary amount, Dy. Director of Education, Pune Region, Pune, to look into it, if such representation is filed by the petitioner. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/JUN11