1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. C.A.NO.8084 OF 2008 IN WP NO.2876 of 2008 (D). Shri Sanjay s/o Gulabchand Gupta ..vs.. Shri Ramdas Gulabrao Missal and ors. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, office Memoranda of Coram Court's or Judge's appearances, Court's orders or directions order and Registrar's order. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= CORAM: D.D.SINHA and A.P.BHANGALE,JJ. DATE : 6th March, 2009. 1. Heard Mr.P.A.Abhyankar, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr.S.M.Puranik, learned counsel for respondent no.1. 2. The Civil application is moved by the applicant seeking direction to take action against the original petitioners in Writ Petition No.2876 of 2008. It is brought to the notice of this court that the Writ Petition No.2876 of 2008 was disposed of as withdrawn by order dated 17/9/2008 on the basis of the statement 2 made by Mr.Puranik, learned counsel for the respondent/Corporation, that the application filed by the petitioners dated 20/8/2008 under Section 53(3) of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act will be decided in accordance with law. 3. The grievance of the present applicant is that the map which was filed by the petitioners along with the said writ petition was not a genuine document and therefore, action be taken against the petitioners. 4. Considered the contentions canvassed by the respective counsel. 5. On the backdrop of the above referred fact, it is evident that this court has not adjudicated upon the issue involved in the writ petition on merits and it is for the respondent/corporation to consider the same on its own merits while deciding the application. In the circumstances, civil application is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE. chute 3