IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO:4719 of 2002 Between: Shaik Moinuddin Ahmed S/o.Shaik Hyder R/o.H.No.1-8-333 to 334, Paigah Palace, Begumpet, Opp:Police Lines, Secunderabad-3. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Govt.of A.P. Rep.by its Secretary, Revenue Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 Govt.of A.P. Rep.by its Dist.Collector, R.R.Dist., Hyderabad. 3 Govt.of A.P. Rep.by its Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevalla Division, Hyderabad. 4 Govt.of A.P. Rep.by its Mandal Revenue Officer, Begumpet Mandal, Hyderabad. 5 Muncipal Corporation of Hyderabad Rep.by its Muncipal Commissioner, C.C.Building, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad. 6 Muncipal Corporation of Hyderabad Rep.by its Chief City Planner, C.C.Building, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MUDDU VIJAI Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 4: AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled for the following substantive relief: “Hence, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction, preferably a writ in the nature of Certiorari calling for the records relating to Memo.No.E1/3550/2001, dt.18-10-2001 and to quash the same as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art.14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to issue no objection certiﬁcate to the petitioner in respect of his property bearing No.1- 8-333 to 1-8-334 admeasuring 850 sq.Yards situated in Sy.No.194/11 of Begumpet village, Balanagar Mandal and also direct the 5th and 6th respondents to accord municipal sanction in respect of the said property of the petitioner.” At the hearing, Sri Muddu Vijai, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as such. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.5927 of 2002 ﬁled by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 13th OCTOBER, 2008. kvni