HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.28041 of 2008 Date: July 12, 2011 Between: Kasana Vijay Kumar … Petitioner And 1. The Commissioner, Endowments Department, Hyderabad & 5 others. … Respondents * * * HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.28041 of 2008 O R D E R: Sri Kesarapally Anjaneya Dharmasala, Eluru, West Godavari district, the fifth respondent, issued auction notice dated 10.6.2007 with regard to the leasehold rights of Shop No.11 situated in its premises at the old bus depot in Eluru Town and Mandal, West Godavari District, for a period of three years from 01.7.2007 to 30.6.2010. The petitioner emerged the highest bidder and the Deputy Commissioner, Endowments Department, Kakinada, under proceedings dated 26.6.2007 approved the grant of the subject lease in his favour. Challenging the same, the sixth respondent, a member of the Dharmasala’s founder’s family, filed R.P. No.5 of 2008 before the Commissioner, Endowments Department, Andhra Pradesh. One amongst the grounds taken by him was that the petitioner had demolished a portion of the leased shop without due permission. The Commissioner, Endowments Department, Andhra Pradesh, taking note of the admission of the petitioner as to this aspect, held that the same was against the terms of the lease and the interest of the institution and accordingly cancelled the lease in favour of the petitioner by order dated 29.11.2008. 2. The sixth respondent also filed R.P. No.4 of 2008 aggrieved by the proceedings dated 17.4.2008 of the Deputy Commissioner, Endowments Department, Kakinada, permitting the construction of the balance work in respect of the shop and delivery of the same thereafter to the petitioner. The Commissioner, Endowments Department, Andhra Pradesh, keeping in mind the order passed by him in R.P. No.5 of 2008 dated 29.11.2008, passed orders in R.P. No.4 of 2008 on the same day, directing completion of the construction of the building and the lease of the same in accordance with due procedure. Calling in question this order, the present writ petition is filed. 3. As this Court has already held, while dismissing W.P. No.24080 of 2008 filed by the petitioner against the order dated 29.11.2008 in R.P. No.5 of 2008, that the matter has become practically infructuous owing to the expiry of the lease period stipulated in the auction notice dated 10.6.2007, this writ petition must also meet the same fate. The disputes amongst the parties inter se, if any, can only lay foundation for monetary claims which cannot be entertained by this court under Article 226 of the Constitution. They would necessarily have to approach the competent civil forum for redressal of their grievances in this regard in accordance with law. 4. This writ petition therefore fails and is accordingly dismissed. Interim orders with regard to stay of dispossession granted in this writ petition shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions shall also stand dismissed in the light of this final order. No order as to costs. ___________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J Date: July 12, 2011. BSB