IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.989 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision 11.02.2011 Hardev Singh and others ...... Petitioners VERSUS Jagdev Singh and another ...... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Akshay Kumar Goel, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J: The petitioners-defendants have invoked the powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, for setting aside the order dated 07.01.2011, passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Moga, dismissing the application for leading additional evidence. The impugned order reveals that the petitioners want to prove the sale deeds which have already been tendered in the statement dated 08.12.2010, made by the their counsel. The learned counsel submits that he wants to prove these sale deeds in order to avoid the objection that these documents are required to be proved in accordance with law. He has contended that he would not press for additional evidence if the respondent No.1-plaintiff does not object to the admissibility and proof of these documents. In view of aforesaid, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to record the statement of the plaintiff if he has any objection to the admissibility and proof of these documents. If he does not accept the admissibility and proof of these documents then the petitioners would be allowed to lead the required evidence. However, it is further directed that the petitioners would close additional evidence within three months positively. 11.02.2011 (A.N.Jindal) mamta Judge mamta-II