1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.155 OF 2009 Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. ...Petitioner. Vs. Mr.Sahebrav Mohanrav Autade & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.Nikhil Mehta i/by Ms.Disha Karambar for the Petitioner. Mr.R.M.Haridas for Respondent No.1. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 8TH JUNE, 2009. P.C.- 1. The parties have arrived at settlement and basically the installments are re-scheduled and accordingly filed the consent terms dated 08/06/2009 signed by the respective Advocates. The Bank Manager who has singed the Petition has signed this consent terms, who is present in the Court. Respondent No.1 who is the main borrower has also signed this consent terms who is also present in the Court. It is recorded that the contents are explained in vernacular 2 language and understood by him. The consent terms is taken on record and marked “X” for identification. The statement is also made that this consent terms is well within the framework of law and the record. 2. In view of above consent terms, the present Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)