IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN MONDAY, THE 3RD MARCH 2008 / 13TH PHALGUNA 1929 RP.No. 253 of 2008() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WA.3030/2007 Dated 04/01/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS ----------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION,SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 2. THE DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, KOZHIKODE. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.BENNY GERVASIS RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. VANI.K, LECTURER IN ENGLISH NEHRU ARTS AND SCIENCE SCIENCE COLLEGE,KANHANGAD. 2. THE UNIVERSITY OF KANNUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, MANGATTUPARAMBU P.O., KANNUR. 3. THE MANAGER, NEHRU ARTS AND SCIENCE COLLEGE, KANHANGAD PADNEKAT P.O,KASARAGOD. SHRI.M.SASINDRAN, SC KANNUR UNIVERSITY SHRI.J.OM PRAKASH THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/03/2008 ALONG WITH WA NO.3030/07, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & P.N.RAVINDRAN, JJ. -------------------------------------------------------------------- RP No.253 of 2008 in WA No.3030/07 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Order Balakrishnan Nair, J. Heard the learned counsel on both sides. The point raised by the review petitioner is covered by the Judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in WA No.258/08. But the learned counsel for the 1st respondent submitted that no ground has been made out warranting review of the Judgment. But we notice that as a result of the judgment under review, the junior of the 1st respondent in WA NO.258/08 will be drawing salary whereas the senior has to wait for the disposal of the Writ Petition to find out whether she is eligible to get salary from the Government. So, we are of the view that unless the Judgment is reviewed, the same will cause great injustice. Accordingly, the RP is allowed. The Judgment under appeal is recalled. It is ordered that the direction in WA No.258/08 will govern WA No.3030/07 also. The learned Single Judge may try to hear the Writ Petition expeditiously. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR,JUDGE 03.03.2008 P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE True copy PA TO JUDGE 2 sta