SSK/916 1 caw.669.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 669 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4146 OF 2005 Mr. Girish Matalia ....Petitioner Versus The Divisional Joint Registrar Co-operative Societies & Ors. ...Respondents Shri Muralidharan i/b. M/s. Joy Legal Consultants,Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. A. H. Palekar, AGP “A” Panel for respondent nos. 1, 2 & 5. Mr. Prashant Darandale i/b. Mr. Vijay Patil for respondent no.3. CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATED : 27th APRIL, 2011. P.C.: The civil application is taken out for restoration of the above said writ petition. The writ petition was dismissed in default on 28th July, 2008 as none appeared on behalf of the petitioner when the petition was called out for hearing. In paragraph nos. 2 to 6, the petitioner has given reasons for not appearing when the matter was called out for hearing. I find the reasons to be satisfactory. The civil application is also not contested by the respondents by filing any reply. In that view of the matter, the civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (b) and (c). The writ petition is restored to file. (RANJIT MORE, J.)