IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 21ST AUGUST 2008 / 30TH SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 25255 of 2008(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER: PETITIONER ---------------------- ABDUL JABBAR, AGED 43, S/O. ENU, MALAKKAPARAMBIL EAST, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS ------------------------ 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER PALAKKAD. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHERPPULASSERY, PALAKKAD. 3. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT., TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. K.R.DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) 25255 of 2008 -------------------------------------------------------- Dated: AUGUST 21, 2008 JUDGMENT The challenge in this writ petition is against Ext.P2. Ext.P2 is a show cause notice calling upon the petitioner to file his objections against the proposal for suspension of his licence. Ext.P2 being only a show cause notice and as it is open to the petitioner to file his objections, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that going by the words used in Ext.P2, it would appear that the respondent has pre-determined the issue. Having gone through Ext.P2, I see no reason to make such an assumption. Writ petition fails and is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE WP(C) 2 mt/-