IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25602 of 2009 1. BINDESHWAR SAH 2. RAMESH SAH -------------------- Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18.8.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. In quarrel of children of both the parties, other members also joined the same but the offences which are alleged under section 379 IPC and section ¾ of S.C./S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act are non-bailable only. According to learned counsel, the offence under section 379 IPC is super addition while no offence under any section of S.C./S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act is made out as petitioners come from Lohar family and do not belong to member of scheduled caste. There is counter case also for the occurrence of the same day. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named two petitioners shall be released on bail on - 2 - furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, in Sitamarhi P.S.Case No. 375/08 subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI