IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN THURSDAY, THE 4TH DECEMBER 2008 / 13TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 26549 of 2008(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- RAJEEV A.K., S/O.KUMARAN, AGED 38 YEARS, AMBAZHATHIMYAL, PALLINAMKARA, THRIKKAKARA NORTH VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ SMT.P.S.SHEEJA RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. P.K.KHADERMON, S/O.MUHAMMED, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, PUTHUVEETTIL HOUSE, PUTHANALLUR AMSOM, OLLUR DESOM, OLLUR (PO), KUTTANELLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. M.BAVA MOOPPAN, S/O.UNNI MOOPPAN, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, MADAPURATH HOUSE, ALFALAJ, ALUVA. 3. M.M.MAJEED, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN, MANDAYAPPURATH THEMALIPURAM VEETTIL, SREEMOOLANAGARAM (P.O) ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. SUBAIR.V.A., S/O.VALIYAKATH ABU HAJI, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, VALIYAKATH HOUSE, THAIKKADU (P.O), GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. W.P.(C) NO.26549/2008 5. MUHAMEDUNNI K.M., S/O.KUTTIPPULLI MUHAMMEDKUTTI HAJI, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, KUTTIPPULLI HOUSE, MAKKARAPPARAMBU (P.O), PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 6. M.SALAHUDHEEN, S/O.M.T.P.HASSAN, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, SHAHIDA HOUSE, S.S.ROAD, THIRUVANGADI AMSOM, DESOM, THALASSERY - 4, KANNUR DISTRICT. 7. AZAD MOOPPAN, S/O.UNNI MOOPPAN, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, MADAPURATH HOUSE, NELLIKODU VILLAGE, NELIKODU DESOM, KOZHIKODU TALUK. 8. SHAJI, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN, THANIYATHIL HOUSE, KAKKANADU, ERNAKULAM. 9. REJI, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALAMASSERY POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM. 10. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, THRIKKAKKARA, ERNAKULAM. 11. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, KOCHI CITY, ERNAKULAM. 12. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CENTRAL ZONE, ERNAKULAM. ADV. SRI.P.K.SURESH KUMAR FOR R1 SRI.P.K.SURESH KUMAR FOR R2,3,4 GOVT.PLEADER, SRI.BENJAMIN PAUL FOR R10 TO R12 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.26549/2008 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S.NO.700/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, ERNAKULAM. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE ORDER DT.26.7.208 IN I.A.NO.4089/2008 IN O.S.NO.700/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, ERNAKULAM. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE COMMISSION REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER T.M.FATHIMA DT.8.6.2008 IN O.S.NO.700/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, ERNAKULAM. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.13181/2008 ON THE FILE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.16957/2008 ON THE FILE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. EXT.P6: COPY OF THE COMMON ORDER OF THIS HON'BLE COURT DT.22.7.2008 IN W.P.(C) NO.13181 & 16957/2008. EXT.P7: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 12TH RESPONDENT DT.27.8.2008. RESPONDENT'S EXTS: EXT.R1(a): COPY OF THE ORDER DT.3.9.2008 IN I.A.NO.4089/2008 IN O.S.No.700/2008 PASSED BY THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, ERNAKULAM. EXT.R1(b): COPY OF THE STRUCTURE PLAN (GENERAL TOWN PLANNING SCHEME) FOR CENTRAL CITY OF KOCHI ISSUED BY GOVT.OF KERALA, LOCAL SELF GOVT.DEPARTMENT VIDE NOTIFICATION NO.G.O(MS)NO.143/07/LSGD DT.31.5.2007. EXT.R1(c): COPY OF PLAN IN RESPECT OF KALAMASSERY MUNICIPAL AREA. EXT.R1(d): COPY OF DECISION OF THIS HON'BLE COURT REPORTED IN 2007 (2)KLT 850. EXT.R1(e): COPY OF ORDER DT.28.7.2008 IN I.A.NO.9717/2008 IN W.P.(C) NO.16957/2008 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT. EXT.R1(f): COPY OF PROCEEDING DT.28.7.2008 OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & V.K.MOHANAN, JJ. ---------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.26549 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of December, 2008 J U D G M E N T ~~~~~~~~~~~ Balakrishnan Nair, J. The petitioner has approached this Court, feeling aggrieved by the alleged harassment from the part of the 9th respondent, who was the Sub Inspector of Police, Kalamassery Police Station. Now, the said officer has been transferred. Therefore, the cause of action for the petitioner no longer survives. But, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted he has filed a representation against the 9th respondent before the 12th respondent. Without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to pursue that representation, this writ petition is closed. (K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE) (V.K.MOHANAN, JUDGE) ps