IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No. 1742 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 24.2.2011 Hari Bhoomi News Paper .. Appellant v. Jagmal Singh Suhag .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. S. P. Chahar, Advocate for the appellant. ... Rajesh Bindal J. Challenge in the present appeal is to the order dated 30.7.2010, passed by the Commissioner under the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 awarding compensation of ` 12,841/- to the respondent. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the respondent was not the employee of the appellant, hence, there was no question of award of compensation to him on account of injuries allegedly suffered by him in the premises of the appellant. He had in fact visited the premises along with some other known persons. Be that as it may, considering the smallness of the amount involved, I do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order at this stage. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Consequently, the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal is also dismissed. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 24.2.2011 mk