IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25010 of 2009 AMAR RAI @ AMAR KUMAR RAI, R/O VILLAGE-KORBADDHA, P.S.-SAMASTIPUR (M), DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR. …………………PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …………………OPP. PARTY. ----------- 2 14.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Case is under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. It is stated that petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is stated that petitioner was arrested on mere suspicion and torch was recovered from his house, said to be one of the looted articles. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the torch is of different colour. It is also submitted that neither recovered article was put on T.I.P nor petitioner was put on T.I.P for identification as involved in the case. No statement has been made with regard to the criminal antecedent of the petitioner. Therefore, this application is disposed of and learned court below is directed to make an enquiry with regard to criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it finds that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent it shall - 2 - release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J., F.T.C.-III, Samastipur in connection with S.T. No. 381 of 2009 arising out of Samastipur (Town) Muffasil P.S. Case No. 138 of 2009. Arvind/ (J. N. Singh, J.)