IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5100 of 2011 BHAGWAN DAS INDUSTRIAL TRAINING CENTRE Buxar Road, Gangawalia, Kochas, District-Rohtas, through its Secretary Kapil Muni Singh, son of Shri Jagdish Singh, resident of mohallah/village-Rupi, P.O.-Akodha, P.S.-Dinara, Distt.-Rohtas---------------------Petitioner. Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA through the Secretary Ministry of Labour, Shramshaki Bhawan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi. 2. The Secretary, National Council for vocational Training(N.C.V.T.), Government of India, Ministry of Labour, Shramshakti Bhawan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi. 3. The Director General, Employment and Training, Government of India, Ministry of Labour, SharamShakti, Rafi Marg, New Delhi. 4. The Regional Director(R.D.A.T.), M.S.O. Building, First Floor, D.F. Block, Sector-1, Salt Lake City, Kolkata-700064 5. The Director Training, R.D.A.T.(E.R.), M.S.O. Building, First Floor, D.F., Block, Sector-1, Salt Late City, Kolkata-700064. 6. The State of Bihar. 7. The Secretary, State Council for Vocational training(S.C.V.T.), Government of Bihar, Department of Employment & Training, Ministry of Labour Resources, New Secretariat, Patna. 8. The Director, Employment and Training, Government of Bihar, Ministry of Labour Resources, Department of Employment & Training, New Secretariat, Patna. 9. The Controller of Examination, Department of Employment and Training, Government of Bihar, I.T.I. Digha Campus, Digha Ghat, Patna.-Respondents. For the petitioner : Mr. Md. Anis Akhtar, Advocate Mr. Arif Dawa Siddique, Advocate For the State of Bihar. : A.C. to G.P.-IV For Union of India : Mr. Md. Abu Haider, Advocate(C.G.C.) --------------- 2. 23.3.2011 The main grievance of the petitioner is with regard to shifting the date of affiliation/recognition of the petitioner’s institution from February, 2011 to August, 2010. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, in this regard representation dated 22.11.2010 (Annexure-7) made by the petitioner remains unanswered till today. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, it would suffice if a direction is given to respondent no.3 to dispose of the representation of the petitioner, if not already disposed of, as 2 expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. With the above observation this writ petition is disposed of. Sudip ( T. Meena Kumari, J.)