^tf s&iffil R EFNRI+" ^. ^ : .!/7. |!Hlsl-£B^i'^^L' '*^- r,eT»y ^ IN THE HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITIONLISI No. 5Vf^ 12007 PETITIONER ./' ^^y <^€^ ^ ^Smt.Binda Bai Kontagale, aged ^. about 32 years, W/oGhansfayam ^^y?'.. Kontagale,ByCasteMahar,R/o ;^S^ >-^" Vj.tJage Andee, Block Development Dongargarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS ^^ ^y^ RESPONDENTS ^2, ^ /" The State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Panchayat andRural Developinent Departinent, D.K. S. Btiawan, Raipur. (C.G.} The Collector, Rajnandgaon, Chief Executive Gfficer, Janpad Panchayat Dongargarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon District Education Officer, Ra.inattdgaon ^ WRIT PET!TIO^UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIOH OF IKDIA ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WRTTPETmONfS) No. 2375 of2007 Smt. Binda Bai Kontagale. VERSU8 RESPONDENTS ' The State ofChhattisgarh & Otfaere. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Ue Shri Satish K. AenUtotri, J. Present: Shri Parag Koteeha, Advocate for tfae petitioner. Shri A.V.Shridhar, Panel Lawyer forthe State/re^pondent No. l,2and4. None for the respondent No. 3, despite serviee ofnotice. ORDERfORAL) (Passed on 08th day of February, 2011) 1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent authorities to pay her salary for the period she has worked as Shiksha Karmi Grade UI and furttier to direct the respondent authorities to make payment ofher salary, refflilariy. 2. According to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, the petitioner was appointed on fhe post of Shiksha Karmi Grade IU vide order dated 27.02.2006. It appears that the appomtment was made on approval gruited by fhe Chief Exeeutive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Dongargarh. 3. Despite service ofnotice, none appears on behatfoftiae respondent No. 3. However, in the retum filed by Ihe respondent No. 3, thers is no averment with regard to the fact asto whether the petitioner is working on the post of Shiksha Karmi Graide HI, or not. The retum deals with other aspect of the matter regarding eligibilhy of the vm •"s/.... ^ . ;; •^ 7. petiticmer;Jii^ Court. There is no whisper with regard to payment ofher salary. Shri Shridhar, leamed Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/ respondent No. l, 2 and 4 submits that the State has adopted the retum filed by the respondent No. 3. However, having regard to tfae facts situation ofthe case, when tiie case of the petttioner is that she has been wotking as Shiksha Kanni Grade III, since 27.02.2006, and no payment has beea made till date, in view of the aforestated faet, it would be just and expedient to direct the Collector, Rajnandgaon to look into the @-ievance offhe petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is working regularly without any paymenL the Collector must ensure that aU the salary is paid to Ifae petitioner for the work she has perfbnned or she has been perfonning regularly, wifhin a period of three weeks from the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. Further, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to make a representation or file other relevant documents before the Collector, as early as possible within a period of one week from today so that the Colleetor may consider the saine before passing theorder. • *- With the aforestated observation and directian, the writ petition is disposed of. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^ Annt