IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41208 of 2009 1. TUNTUN SINGH 2. Pawan Singh 3. Anil Singh @ Anil Kr. Singh 4. Raj Kumar Singh @ Raj Kishore Singh 5. Arvind Singh 6. Shambhu Singh @ Shambhu Kumar 7. Mukesh Singh Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----- 2/ 10.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that reason is there to believe that allegation for offence under the S.C. and S.T. Act is false as complainant’s husband was made accused for his act of committing theft by brother-in-law of petitioner nos. 1, 2 and 3. That is more clear from the very beginning of the allegation that the complainant’s husband was also asked to work in their field but skill came in picture at the later stage that nothing happened with the husband, by making vague allegation, every act of assault, humiliation and outraging the modesty centralized upon the complainant. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 3534 of 2008 (Tr. No. 3125 of 2009), above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S. Uraon, 2 J.M., Ist Class, Vaishali at Hajipur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)