PETITIONER: / Ku. Uma Yadav, D/o Shri Chandulal Yadav, aged about 26 years, Resident of B.D. Mahant, New Chandaniya Para, Janjgir, District — Janjgir — Champa (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: / Secretary Public information, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantraiay, Raipur (C.G.), 2. Chhattisgarh State information Commissioner, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3 The Pubiic information Officer, Pubiic Service Commission, Pandari Raipur (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE WRIT. ORDERS OR DIRECTION. mm REaxzm gW .t \ Wt” ‘I r???w {T w..... w W 3 ’“axw ¢w$ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH Writ Petition (C) N036“ to /2011 (8.8.) WW N HIGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (CI NO.3510 OF 2011 (Writ Petition under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnlhotri, J. Present :- Shri Prakash Tiwari, Advocates for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri No.2. Shyam Tek Chandani, Advocate for the respondent ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 5‘“ day of July, 201 1) 1. At the very outset, learned counsei appearing for the respondents No.2 submits that the appeal preferred by the petitioner has aiready been decided by the State Information Commission on 22—6—2011. thus, the grievance of the petitioner that despite the time schedule prescribed under the provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005, the appeal has not been decided, has oome to an end. A copy of the order sheet of the Commission is produced before this Court, which is taken on record. In view of foregoing, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication and accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gowri PETITIONFR Ku. Uma Yadav Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh &