IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-24948 of 2008 Date of Decision: October 21, 2008 Palwinder Singh & Others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Ritesh Pandey, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. H.S. Brar, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.46 dated 2.8.2008 lodged for offences under Section(s) 326, 324, 307 148, 149 with Police Station, Dera Baba Nanak, Police District Batala, District Gurdaspur. Learned counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions from Sarwan Singh, Head Constable, states that so far as the case of petitioner Nos.1 and 4 namely Palwinder Singh son of Nirmal Singh and Gurmeet Singh son of Sucha Singh is concerned, they are not required for further investigation. Having regard to the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent-State, this petition qua petitioner Nos.1 and 4, Palwinder Singh and Gurmeet Singh, respectively, is allowed. It is directed that in Crl. Misc. No. M-24948 of 2008 [2] the event of arrest, petitioner Nos.1 and 4 shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer, subject to the following conditions :- “(i) Petitioner Nos.1 and 4 shall make themselves available for interrogation as and when required; (ii) Petitioner Nos.1 and 4 shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and (iii) Petitioner Nos.1 and 4 shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.” This order shall enure till 10 days after petitioner Nos.1 and 4 receive a notice of filing of final report u/s 173, Cr.P.C. within which period, they would be at liberty to apply for regular bail. So far as the case of petitioner Nos.2 and 3 namely Daljit Singh and Ajit Pal Singh is concerned, it has been pointed out that they have been attributed injuries on account of which Section 326 IPC has been invoked. Daljit Singh caused grievous injury on the person of Malkiat Singh on the left side arm near the Elbow. Ajit Pal Singh caused injury on the person of Massan Singh on the left arm. In view of the role ascribed to petitioner Nos.2 and 3, petition qua them is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) October 21, 2008 JUDGE avin