IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 25TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 3RD ASWINA 1929 WP(C).No. 28394 of 2007(E) -------------------------- AS.36/2004 of SUB COURT, CHERTHALA .................... PETITIONER: ------------ K.DINESAN, SON OF KANNANCHI, KOTHACHAMKADU VEEDU, ERAMALLOOR MURI, ERAMALLOOR VILLAGE, CHERTHALA. BY ADV. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY SMT.N.SANTHA SRI.K.A.BALAN SRI.PETER JOSE CHRISTO SRI.S.A.ANAND SRI.JOVY GEORGE VARGHESE RESPONDENTS: ------------------- 1. VELAYUDHAN, S/O CHERUKKAN, KEEKKARAYIL, UZHUVA MURI, VAYALAR EAST VILLAGE, CHERTHALA. 2. DIVAKARAN, S/O CHERUKKAN, KEEKKARAYIL, UZHUVA MURI, VAYALAR EAST VILLAGE, CHERTHALA. 3. PRASAD, S/O VELAYUDHAN, CHIRAYIL HOUSE, CMC-27, CHERTHALA. 4. SHAJI, S/O VELAYUDHAN, KEEKKARAYIL, UZHUVA MURI, VAYALAR EAST VILLAGE, CHERTHALA. 5. SURESH, S/O VELAYUDHAN, KEEKKARAYIL, UZHUVA MURI, VAYALAR EAST VILLAGE, CHERTHALA. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.N. KRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.C. NO. 28394 OF 2007 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 25th day of September, 2007. J U D G M E N T This writ petition is filed seeking to set aside Ext.P1 order and also for a direction to the Sub Judge, Cherthala to dispose of A.S.36/04 as expeditiously as possible. So far as Ext.P1 order is concerned the Court has applied its mind and passed an order. Therefore, there is no ground to interfere with that order at this stage and therefore the said prayer is declined. 2. So far as the the 2nd prayer is concerned the prayer is only for an expeditious disposal of the case. Considering the factual circumstances of the case, I direct the learned Sub Judge, Cherthala to get the records from the lower Court as expeditiously as possible giving a breathing time to the parties and then dispose of it in accordance with W.P.C 28394 OF 2007 -:2:- law as expeditiously as possible. Just because I am not fixing a time limit the Court shall not grant indiscriminate adjournment to any of the parties. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/-