IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.4139 & 4141 of 2010 CRP.No.4139/2010: Between: Pasala Balachandra Reddy (died) and 4 others ..... PETITIONERS AND Pamula Raghunatha Reddy (died) and 2 others .....RESPONDENTS CRP.No.4141/2010: Between: Pasala Balachandra Reddy (died) and 4 others ..... PETITIONERS AND Pamula Raghunatha Reddy (died) and 2 others .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.4139 & 4141 of 2010 COMMON ORDER: The petitioners in both these civil revision petitions are the plaintiffs in the suit in O.S.25/2003 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Puttur. The petitioners/plaintiffs filed I.A.Nos.298 and 299/2010 in the said suit seeking to receive the documents by condoning the delay and to recall PW 1 for further examination. Both the applications have been dismissed by the Court below, against which the present civil revision petitions are filed under Artile-227 of the Constitution of India. I do not see absolutely no grounds to interfere with the impugned orders as the petitioners have not stated any particulars of the documents sought to be filed and their relevancy, and also the delay was not properly explained and therefore, the said two applications have been rightly dismissed by the Court below. Accordingly, these two Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed. However, it is left open for the petitioners/plaintiffs to file fresh applications with detailed particulars and assigning reasons before the Court below, and if any such applications are filed, the same may be considered and disposed of in accordance with law. No costs. ________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 09.09.2010 Dsr