IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Civil Writ Petition No.2156 of 2010. Date of decision: 21.05.2010. Vinod Kumar ….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Others ….Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge. Whether approved for reporting ?1 No. For the Petitioner: Mr.Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr.R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr.J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J.(Oral): The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:- (1) “That writ in nature of mandamus may kindly be issued and respondents may very kindly be directed to consider the representation made by the petitioner sympathetically and further writ in the nature of mandamus may very kindly be issued and the respondents may very kindly be directed to transfer the petitioner to the station of his choice, in view of the disability suffered by the petitioner and by further taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner has completed his normal tenure at the present place of working.” 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. It is submitted that the petitioner has filed representation Annexure P-2 which is pending before the 2nd respondent. According to the petitioner he is entitled for transfer since he has already completed normal required tenure in the tribal area. That apart, he is also a physically challenged person. Therefore, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to look into the matter in accordance with law adverting to the submissions made in representation Annexure P-2 within a period of two weeks from the date of the production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of so also the pending applications. Copy dasti on usual terms. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Dev Darshan Sud), Judge. May 21, 2010 (aks/r)