CRM-M No. 22303 of 2011 **** Chander Bhan vs. State of Haryana Present: Mr. Ramender Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Man Mohan Sikka, DAG Haryana . **** This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in case bearing FIR No. 985 dated 13.12.2008, under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, 506, 447 and 448 IPC registered at Police Station Sadar, Hisar, District Hisar. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that Banaspati is the main accused who has made the petitioner as General Power of Attorney and sold the land. Learned DAG, on instructions from ASI Darshan Singh, has stated that petitioner was fully involved in the fraud because Banaspati had executed Power of Attorney in favour of the petitioner and then in connivance with the petitioner revoked the same and sold the property to the complainant. In view of the above, I do not find any ground to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Dismissed. ( AJAY TEWARI ) August 23, 2011 JUDGE reena