1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO: 3307 OF 2009 Madan S/o Suryabhanrao Mhaske. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. 1. We have heard learned counsel Mr. D. J. Choudhari for the Petitioner. Petitioner's grievance is that the petitioner is a member of Vrandawan Sahakari Grah Nirman Sanstha Maryadit, Morewadi, Taluka Ambajogai, district Beed. According to him, this society is registered in view of the provisions of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. Petitioner is a founder member of this society. Petitioner has some grievance regarding functioning of the cooperative society concerned. He, therefore, made representation to the Respondent No.2. Copy of the representation is Annexure P-2 (page 12 of the compilation). Counsel for the Petitioner took us through para 6 of this representation. Copy of the representation shows that the said representation has been received by the Respondent NO.2 on 10th June, 2008. Grievance raised is that this representation is not considered by the Respondent No.2. 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. 2. Learned A.G.P. is present on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 and 2. 3. Respondent No.2 is "Registrar" in view of the provisions of the Act of 1960. From the verified statement in para 3 we have noticed that the petitioner is a member of the society concerned and has got locus to move the Registrar i.e. Respondent No.2. 4. We dispose of this writ petition, directing the Respondent No.2 to consider the complaint/ representation dated 9th June, 2008 made by the present petitioner and received by the Respondent No.2 on 10th June, 2008, within a period of three months from today. This period, we are laying down for the reason that for about more than one year the said representation is pending and not disposed of by the Respondent No.2. 5. We make it clear that the Respondent No.2 while deciding said representation shall hear all concerned, including the present Petitioner and communicate the order to the Petitioner and all concerned. 3 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. 6. Petition stands disposed of in view of the above directions. [S. S. SHINDE, J.] [S. B. DESHMUKH, J.] Dated:15/07/2009. ans/3307