IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN MONDAY, THE 28TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 7TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 1363 of 2008 ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.12679/2003 Dated 04/01/2008 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER/ WRIT PETITIONER: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ R.SATHEESAN (EX.NO.7119248, CFN EME) S/O.P.N.RAGHAVAN, AGED 54 YEARS, PUTHANPURAYIL HOUSE, P.O.KADAPPAKADA, KOLLAM, KERALA. BY ADV. SRI.M.RAJAGOPALAN RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------- 1. SMT.H.K.PANNU, AGED NOT KNOW TO THE PETITIONER, D/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER CHIEF CONTROLLER OF DEFENCE ACCOUNTS (PENSION), ALLAHABAD. BY ADV. SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASST.SOLICITOR FOR R1 SMT.E.V.MOLY FOR R2 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: STK Con.Case(C).No. 1363 of 2008 APPENDIX PETITIONER ANNEXURES: 1: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT DATED 4-1-2008 IN OP NO.12679/2003 OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT. RESPONDENT EXHIBITS: 1: TRUE COPY OF THE CORRIGENDUM OBTAINED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE ADJUTANT GENERAL'S BRANCH, INTEGRATED HQ OF MoD (ARMY) DATED 24TH AUGUST 2011. //TRUE COPY// P A TO JUDGE STK P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Contempt of Court Case No. 1363 of 2008 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of November, 2011 JUDGMENT This contempt case was filed on 22.9.2008 alleging that the direction issued by this Court in Annexure A1 judgment delivered on 4.1.2008 in O.P.No. 12679 of 2003 has not complied with. The respondent has sworn to an affidavit dated 17.2.2010, wherein it is stated that disability pension was granted to the petitioner and payment was made by cheque dated 17.10.2008. The respondent has also expressed unconditional apology for the delay in implementing the direction issued by this Court. Such being the situation as the direction in the judgment delivered on 4.1.2008 has been complied with, I find no reason to proceed further with this contempt case. It is accordingly closed. Sd/- P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE. Rkc //True Copy// PA to Judge