IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-37023 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: January 06, 2011 Sunil Kumar and another …..Petitioners versus State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr.Vivek Salathia, Advocate for the petitioners Mr.Arshwinder Singh, DAG, Punjab .. RAJAN GUPTA, J.: (Oral) This is a petition under section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking pre-arrest bail in a case registered against the petitioners under sections 420/34 IPC vide FIR No.162 dated 17.11.2010 at police station B-Division, District Amritsar. Learned counsel for the petitioners has contended that petitioners are innocent businessmen and have been falsely implicated in the case. He, thus, submits that they are entitled to concession of pre-arrest bail. Learned State counsel has, however, vehemently opposed the prayer and submits that allegations against the petitioners are serious. They are, thus, not entitled to bail. Heard. A perusal of the FIR shows that allegations against the petitioners are that they were manufacturing spurious surf in connivance with each other and selling the same under some fictitious trademarks. The police, on Crl.Misc.No.M-37023 of 2010 - 2 - receiving information, intercepted vehicle bearing No.PB- 02-BH-9730 and recovered spurious surf from the same. In view of nature of allegations levelled, I am of the considered view that petitioners are not entitled to concession of pre-arrest bail. The petition is, thus, devoid of merit and is hereby dismissed. January 06, 2011 ( RAJAN GUPTA ) pc JUDGE 2