IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 12640 of 2011. [O&M] Date of Decision: 11th November, 2011. Vidya Petitioner through Mr. Surinder Gandhi, Advocate Versus Pt. Bhagwat Dyal Sharma University of Health & Ors. Respondents through Mr. Rajbir Sehrawat, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner is a B.Sc. Nursing student in the College of Nursing, Pt. Bhagwat Dyal Sharma University of Health Sciences, Rohtak. She is aggrieved by the order dated 20.06.2011 [Annexure P-3] passed by the Appellate Authority of the University under the Right to Information Act, 2005 declining her request for inspection of the answer-sheets or to furnish the information in relation thereto. She also seeks a direction for re-evaluation of her answer-sheets of Medical Surgical Nursing Examination of 2nd Year besides a direction to conduct an inquiry against the Principal of the College of Nursing. The respondents have filed reply/affidavit opposing the petitioner's prayer. It is not in dispute that during the pendency of this writ petition, the answer-sheets have been shown to the petitioner and on an application by her for re-evaluation of the answer-sheets, some of these have been re-evaluated, resulting into change in result of the petitioner from 'fail' to 'pass'. The fact remains that a student's right to obtain copies of the answer-sheets of an examination has since been approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:- [i] the petitioner may seek copies of the answer-sheets, if any, not supplied to her so far; [ii] as regard to her plea that in one of the answer-sheets an answer has not been evaluated, the petitioner may apply for re-checking in accordance with the University Regulations and if such an application is submitted, the same shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with the University Regulations/law; [iii] keeping in view the categoric stand taken by the respondents in the reply that in one of the paper, the petitioner was shown 'fail' due to clerical error, I do not find it a fit case to direct any inquiry against the Principal of the College and that too at the instance of a student; [iv] this order shall have no bearing on the civil suit pending between the parties. Disposed of. Dasti. November 11, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE