IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 28TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 9TH PHALGUNA 1929 CRP.No. 181 of 2008() --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 5.2.2008 ON IA.231/2008 IN OS.260/03 of SUB COURT, MAVELIKKARA .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF --------------------------------------- SHANAVAS, ADHIKARATHIL HOUSE, KEEZHCHERYMEL MURI, CHENGANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.K.SASIKUMAR RESPONDENT/COUNTER PETITIONER/DEFENDANT ------------------------------------------------------ RAMESH, USHA NILAYAM, ANGADICKAL, CHENGANNUR. THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.KRISHNAN, J. -------------------------- C.R.P. NO. 181 OF 2008 --------------------- Dated this the 28thday of February, 2008 ORDER This revision petition is preferred against the order of the Subordinate Judge, Mavelikara, in dismissing IA 231/08 in OS 260/03. 2. The plaintiff in the suit moved an application for reception of documents and witness list just 17 days prior to the commencement of the trial. The court below technically found that it was not just to entertain the reception of document and therefore dismissed it. It is desirable that the document is received and witnesses are permitted to be examined so that the said hurdle will not be raised further at the appellate stage, which will only protract the proceedings and will defeat the very purpose of speedy disposal of the matter. 3. Therefore in the interest of justice, I allow the application. The order passed by the court below is set aside and the court below is directed to receive the documents in evidence, if it is admissible, and also to give permission to examine the witnesses. The civil revision petition is disposed of accordingly. M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE vps