IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. W.P. No.1638 of 2010 Date of Decision:21.9.2010 Vineet Arya .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Karan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Priyanka Dalal, A.A.G. Haryana. Mr. Sunil Panwar, Advocate for respondents No.3 and 4. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a roving writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus directing respondents No.3 and 4 to produce and release the detenue Shallu Kamboj, who is stated to be in illegal detention of respondents No.3 and 4. Accordingly, notice of motion was issued for today i.e. 21.9.2010 and respondents No.3 and 4 were directed to be present alongwith alleged detenue Shallu Kamboj. Today, respondents No.3 and 4 are present in person alongwith alleged detenue Shallu Kamboj represented by the learned counsel Mr. Sunil Panwar, Advocate. A separate statement of said Shallu Kamboj is recorded in the Court today. As per her statement made in the Court, she does not wish to accompany the petitioner and wants to live with her parents i.e. respondents No.3 and 4. It is evident from the statement of Shallu Kamboj that she is not in illegal custody. The present petition is, accordingly, dismissed. 21.9.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE