SINGLE BEICH .. r'.\oa { ./ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO. ISGS~/ 2005 Petitioiier R^S-pcnn c^e r^ Re^pondent ?\^-^ Subri Baip Widow of Lalchaiidy Aged afoout 75 years, Caste Mahar^ R/o Vfflage Hafkachora, Jagdalpiir,, Dist. Bastai- (C.G.) Versus Smt. Jugi'i Bai, W/o Ram^ Caste Mahor, R/o Vfflage Hatkachora^ Jagdalpur? Dist. Bastar (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 3TI^T^T f^rt^^n^T ^)^i<=b ^rf^T ^)^(<=b Gowri y -> 3:^^TFTT?PT, ^Tfl<141<o, (®t<ni^y ^l<^»IM5«ft,^, ^- ^i<^€ylls^Hi<^^"^""^^"**'^TS, 200 W^T^ITCIT^Rf^T 26-04-2005 Shri P. Diwakar, Sr. Ad{« for the petitioner. Heard. This petition under Arti^ been filed against th©order| Addjtional District Judge, whereby the appiication filed and appiication undesr Section| of Civil Procedure have been r^ Learned counsel for thj fixed for today for its fsnal Havi'ng considored tho] and material on record, on "in view of the iaw iaid down Dey SaivsRamacnandeLR^ opinion of this Court, no case made out in exercise of extra-c the Constitution of India. H< grounds in an appeal in case s With the aforesaid obs of. Consequently, M.(W.).F stand disposed of. <=hi^Td<^lri ^i^€nT^fte^<l^<^i< ^^rf^T^RT 'ocate with Shri P.R. Patenkar, counsel ^te 227 of the Constitution<of India has dated 7-3-2005 passed by the IVth Ja^dalpur in Civil Appeal No.03-A/2005, ^y the petitioner under Order 6 Rule 17 107 read with Section 151 of the Code ^jected after its hearing. petitioner submits that the appeal is argurfsents. facte and circumsteinces of tho case perlusaj of the order of the Court below and fc|y the Apex Court in the case of Surva ji reported in AIR 2003 SC 3044, jn the Vp! interference in the impugned order is rdinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of j^wever, the petitioner may raise the ^ ^ch an eventuality arises. ?rvations, the petition stands disposed .No.1223/05 and IA.No. 3039/05 also Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge (^^l^r) lli