FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.132 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITIONNO.3595 OF 2010 (Ashalata d/o Bhanudas Kalme Vs. Satish Rajabhau Patki & ors.) -------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Shri Sachin Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitioner Shri Vivek Bhavthankar, Advocate for Respondents No.1 & 2 Shri V.B. Ghatge, A.G.P. for respondent No.3 ... CORAM: K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED: 13th December, 2010 1. Heard. The affidavit-in-reply filed by the State and particularly para 4 clarifies that the dues of the petitioner are channelized to be received in time schedule. The grievance of the petitioner is that she was eligible for salary/ wages from June 1999 to September 1999, however, is not accounted for from any cogent and coherent evidence. This Court need not travel beyond the scope of the order in Writ Petition No.3595/2000, dated 21.3.2009. In the light of the above situation, Contempt Petition disposed of. No costs. The petitioner is at liberty to exhaust other remedies for the aforementioned four months’ wages if she is eligible. (K.U. CHANDIWAL) JUDGE fmp/cp132.10