1 W.P.No.1359.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 1359 OF 2010 Bhushan S/o Dattatrya Chinchore and others ... PETITIONERS V E R S U S The State of Maharashtra and others ... RESPONDENTS ... Mr.H.D.Patil ,Advocate for Petitioners. ... CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR, J. DATE : 26TH APRIL, 2010. PER COURT : 1] Heard Counsel. 2] The petitioners are disqualified under section 39(1) of the Bombay Village Panchyat Act. The disqualification was on account of misconduct by committing misappropriation of certain amount and not furnishing of the proper accounts. The order of the competent Authority has been confirmed by State Minister vide impugned order dated 15th July 2009. 3] Having considered the relevant orders and having heard learned counsel for the petitioners, I find that there are concurrent findings recorded by the competent Authorities. These are findings of facts based on record. The petitioners have raised only disputed question of facts 2 W.P.No.1359.10 in this petition. The authorities have considered the documentary evidence in support of their inference that the petitioners have committed alleged misconduct which dis-entitled them from continuing as bearers of the office of village Panchayat. No substance in the petition dismissed. Sd/- ( V.R.KINGAONKAR, J. ) MTK