1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1934 OF 2007 IN APPEAL (LODGING) NO.663 OF 2006 IN PETITION NO.40 OF 2001 Pravin H. Meghani (Karta of Pravin H. Meghani HUF) Appellant vs. Prakash Jain & ors. Respondents And Bharati Pravin Meghani & ors. Applicants Mr.S.J.Khera for the applicants. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED : 14th January 2008 P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant. None appears for the Respondents though served. Affidavit of service has been filed. The learned counsel for the Appellant undertakes to carry out necessary amendments in the Notice of Motion as well as the Memo of Appeal within two weeks from today. 2. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 72 days delay caused in filing the above Appeal. Perused the Notice of Motion and affidavit in support thereof. For the reasons stated therein, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay caused in filing the above Appeal. There is no case of 2 inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.] V. MOHTA,J.] V. MOHTA,J.] [DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, [DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, [DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.] J.] J.]