IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33332 of 2010 Between: T. Hanumanthappa ..... Petitioner AND The Govt., of A.P., rep., by its Secretary to Cooperative Dept, Hyderabad & others. .....Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri L.V.S. Nagaraju The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33332 of 2010 ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of 4th respondent in issuing notice dated 06.05.2009 and a consequential letter dated 30.08.2010 without taking into consideration the representation dated 10.01.2010 for One Time settlement scheme to clear the dues pending with the respondent bank as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and also contrary to orders passed by the Hon’ble High Court in W.A.No.1227 of 2001 and batch dated 20.08.2009 and consequently set aside the notice dated 06.05.2009 and letter dated 30.08.2010 by directing the respondents to provide an opportunity to the petitioner for settlement of the dues pending with the respondent bank by way of one time settlement by waiving the interest as was done in similarly situated defaulters and also to correct the wrong calculations made in the petitioner’s account.” At the hearing, Sri L.V.S. Nagaraju, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to his client to raise a dispute before respondent No.5 under Section 61 of the A.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1964. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn, WPMP.No.42287 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also dismissed. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 25.01.2011 ES