IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN THURSDAY, THE 21ST OCTOBER 2010 / 29TH ASWINA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 1193 of 2010(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.12854/2010 Dated 20/04/2010 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.G.ARUN, AGED 39 YEARS, S/O.K.G.GOPINATHAN, INTERNAL AUDITOR, ULIYACOVIL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.Q.1003, ULIYAKOVIL, KOLLAM RESIDING AT PRAKASH MANDIRAM, ULIYACOVIL, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON GOMEZ SRI.S.VINCENT RESPONDENT(S): SECOND RESPONDENT -------------------------------- SIVAN PILLAI (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, KOLLAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.ANU SIVARAMAN. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.N. RAVINDRAN, J. ------------------------------- Cont. Case (C) No. 1193 OF 2010 ------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T This contempt case is filed alleging that the directions issued by this Court in Annexure-A1 judgment in W.P.(C) No.12854 of 2010 have not been complied with. 2. When the contempt case came up for admission on 27.9.2010, this Court passed the following order:- “Admit. Issue notice to respondent by speed post returnable in 10 days. Post on 11.10.2010. If by then, the direction issued by this Court as per Annexure I is not implemented, the respondent shall appear in person at 10.15 a.m. on 11.10.2010.” 3. The respondent has filed an affidavit dated 5.10.2010 and produced along with it Ext.R1(a) order dated 30.9.2010 passed by the respondent rejecting the petitioner's representation against the order of suspension. The respondent has also tendered unconditional apology for the delay in complying with the directions issued by this Court in Annexure-A1 judgment. It is also brought to my notice that the petitioner has filed W.P.(C) No.29666 of 2010 challenging Ext.R1 (a) order. In such circumstances, I am of the opinion that no further orders are called for in this contempt case. It is accordingly closed. P.N. RAVINDRAN, JUDGE. nj. W.P.(C) No. 2