IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.4368 of 2009 1. MOSTT. JAMUN DEVI @ JAMUNA DEVI 2. MOSTT. PUNA DEVI BOTH ARE WIVES OF LATE BHULUR MISHRA AND RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – RASIARY, POST OFFICE – RASIARY, POLICE STATION – GHANSHYAMPUR, DISTRICT – DARBHANGA. Versus The Union Of India & Ors. ----------- For the petitioner :- Mr. Ram Das singh, Advocate For the Union of India :- Mrs. Kalpana, Advocate. For the State :- Mr. J.S. Barnwal, S.C. I --------------- 04. 28.07.2011 This Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. This contempt application has been filed complaining that the order dated 12th of January 2005, whereby this court directed for payment of pension admissible to the petitioner within a time indicated on submission of the copy of this order. This contempt application has been filed after more than 4 years. However, learned counsel for the State has filed a show cause stating therein that the order has been complied with and the pension admissible to the petitioner has been paid. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest, as directed by this court has not been paid to the petitioner. In reply, learned counsel for the State submits that the same was payable only after submission of the copy of the order of this court. There is no averment or any statement as to when the copy of the order was submitted by the petitioner in the department. Considering the submission of the parties and on perusal of the show cause, I do not find any ground that this application should proceed further and the same stands disposed of. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)