IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2524 of 2006 RAM DAYAL PASWAN & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 25.10.2010 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State it emerges that an identical relief and prayer made by yet another person namely Raj Kishore Jha in CWJC No. 7452 of 2004 was heard by learned Single Judge and the writ application was dismissed vide order dated 5.1.2006 as contained in annexure-A to the counter affidavit. The case of the present petitioners and the reliefs prayed for therein are similar in nature. In view of the same the present writ application is also dismissed for similar reason because the benefit given to the petitioners as contained in annexure-3 was obviously contrary to the circular dated 14.2.1991 which was issued much prior to the appointment of the petitioners to the post and they can not draw advantage of 1986 circular. The order therefore of recovery seems to be in order and inconsonance of the government policy and coupled with the fact that similar writ application has already been dismissed this writ application is dismissed as being devoid of merit. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)