HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA. ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No. 386OF 2003 15TH JUNE, 2010. BETWEEN Smt. D.Varalakshmi ……Petitioner/Defacto complainant and The State of AP, rep. By its Public Prosecutor, High Court of AP, hyderabad, and, ors … Respondents/Accused. HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA. ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No. 386d OF 2003 ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case, under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. is ﬁled by the defacto complainant aggrieved by the order dated 3.3.2003 in Crl.M.P.No. 369 of 2003 in S.T.C.No. 407 of 1999 passed by the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Suryapet, Nalgonda District. The petitioner herein is the defacto complainant, who ﬁled a complainant before the Police on the basis of pamphlets published and distributed by the Accused 2 to 13 attributing certain allegations against her and her husband. An oﬀence under Section 504 IPC was registered against the accused 2 to 13. However, The State, represented by the Station House oﬃcer, Thungathurthy Police Station filed Crl.M.P.No. 369 of 2003 in STC.No. 407 of 1999 before the Court below under Section 216 Cr.P.C. praying the Court to add Section 500 IPC stating that distribution of false pamphlets also amounts to an offence punishable under Section 500 IPC. The learned Magistrate, however, dismissed the petition without recording any reason. Hence, the defacto complainant ﬁled the present revision petition. On a perusal of the record, this Court is of the view that even though the learned Magistrate had not recorded any reason properly, but the investigating agency has no role to play to stop the investigation or prosecute the oﬀence under Section 500 I.P.C., in view of the prohibition under Section 199 Cr.P.C.. In that view of matter, this Criminal Revision Case is not maintainable and accordingly the same is dismissed. ------------------------------------ JUSTICE RAJA. ELANGO Dated 15.06.2010. Msnr.