1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 83 OF 2010 (Commissioner of Income Tax-I vs. Gupta Domestic Fuels (Nagpur) Ltd.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri Anand Parchure, Advocate for the appellants. ….. CORAM : S.A. BOBDE & MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. FEBRUARY 17, 2011. Heard. The following substantial questions of law have been raised for consideration of this Court. i) In the facts and circumstances of the case, whether the ITAT is correct in deleting the addition made on account of peak balance of Rs.2 lacs though the assessee has not discharged its onus by submitting consolidated accounts statements merging the secret note pad/ vouchers and regular books of accounts ? ii) In the facts and circumstances of the case, can it be held that assessee discharged its onus as well as burden of proof in establishing that unaccounted transactions in secret note pad and vouchers are disclosed to department ? iii) In the facts and circumstances of the case, is the ITAT is justified in deleting the addition accepting 2 assessees explanation with regard to secret note pad and secret vouchers ? However, we find that the aforesaid questions of law do not involve any substantial questions of law but raise questions of fact. Hence, no case for assailing the findings made by the Tribunal is made out and there is no perversity in the order. Appeal is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.