•^ Vte^'A i- KhSMl e ^ on=> IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G) W.P. fSI N0. ^f /2007 PETITIONERS .^JV^ y -. .Y^i>y"'^ .-•* \i^S?y ...'",^•'1\ s^ A' •vf-' ^>- r y •-^ A^ f^'y ^ C3r t.- •..?s^5''» i 'SSS's-^^:: ^s 3 V-T','!-, '''f': (S^^-, ':-, ^c^ A^ Sunder Lal Dhritlahare, Son of Shri Manhiya Ram, aged about 42 years, Assistant Teacher Primary School Kumhari, Darri, District Korba (C.G.) '27 Saukhi Lal Kurre, son of Shri Ghuruwa Das Kurre., aged about 35 Years, Assistant Teacher Primary School Dhauramuda, Block Pondiuproda, District Korba (C.G.) 3. Dubraj Singh Kanwar, son of Shri Ram Prasad Kanwar , aged about 3S years, Assistant Teacher Primary School Baigapara, Block Kartala, District Korba (C.G.) 4,. Narayan Prasad Kaiwartya, son of Dandari Ram, aged about 36 Years, Assistant Teacher, Primary School Samlai, Block-Pondiuproda, Tahsil and District Korba (C.G.) RESPONDENTS 5. Smt. Vandana Shrivastava, Wife of Rajesh Shrivastava, aged about 39 Years, Assistant Teacher, Schedule Caste Girls Development Primary School Gavera-Basti, Block - Katghora, District Kbrba (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Schedule Tribe Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^. The Commissioner Schedute Tribe Welfare Department Raipur (C.G.) 3.,-" The Collector Schedule Caste & Schedule Tribe Welfare Department, Korba, Tahsil and District Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF IN D IA dp HI6H COURT gFMWrn.S6AW AT BILASPUR W. P. fSl No. 219 of 2007 Petitioner* : Smt.Monika Tirkey Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and others W. P. (51 Nto 236 of 2007 Petitioners : Dubraj Singh Rathiya andothers Versus \ Respondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh ond others W. P CS\ No. 246 of 2007 Petitioners : Sunder Lal Dhritlahdre and others Verais Respondents : State ofChhattisgarh and another AM W P (51 . 247 of 2007 Petitioner : Surdeep Singh Netam Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and onother SB: Hon'bteAAr. Justice SatishK. Agnihotri. J Siri Soutam IQietropal, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Sushit bubey, Sovemment Advocate for •the respohdents/State. OR O E R (Passed on 18rt doy of January, 2007) The following order of the Court te possed bySatish K. Agnihotri, J. 1. Leamed counsel cppearing for the petitioners os well as teamed Depu-ty Sovemment Advocate oppearing for th? respondents/State jointly submit that the facts of the present case dre similar to that y . r-3.'' :<^ . of in W. P. 1463 of 2006 Meman Jain Vs. 5tnte 6ovt. of Chhorttisgarh & ono'ther), which was dispoad of vide ocder dated 10 November, 2006. They furtfier submit tliat the question of law iwolved te also the same. 2.i In view of the above stnted submissions made by leamed counsel for the parties. these writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the order dated 10th November, 2006 passed by this Court- in W. P. 1463 of 2006. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on record inother connected writ petitions. Bablu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^-