(-1-) MGN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.875 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.724 OF 2004 Ganesh Ramu Padachi .....Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ......Respondent Smt.Anjali Patil, for the Applicant. Ms. S.D. Bhosale, APP for respondent. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & A.A.KUMBHAKONI,JJ. A.A.KUMBHAKONI,JJ. A.A.KUMBHAKONI,JJ. DATED: 6th October, 2008 DATED: 6th October, 2008 DATED: 6th October, 2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The Appellant was convicted on 23rd February, 2004 for an offence punishable under Section 302 of the I.P.C. He had filed an application being Criminal Application No.4108 of 2004, where the order note records that it was dismissed on 18th October, 2004. This is the second bail application. It is unfortunate that no reference is made to this application which was rejected. The only explanation given by the Counsel is that there are no reasons in the order dated 18th October, 2004. That is no ground for not disclosing the same in the present application. If there be no reasons the petitioner, if aggrieved, has a remedy at law. (-2-) 2. In the present application nothing has been pointed out to us by way of subsequent events except the fact that the petitioner by now has undergone seven years imprisonment to apply afresh. In our opinion considering the rejection of the earlier application the present application would not be maintainable. The mere fact that the petitioner has undergone seven years imprisonment by itself is no ground. Hence application for bail is rejected. (A.A.KUMBHAKONI, J.) (A.A.KUMBHAKONI, J.) (A.A.KUMBHAKONI, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)