IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.16237 of 2010 Date of Decision : September 10, 2010. Anirudh .....Petitioner versus Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. And others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by the selection of respondent No.3 for allotment of retail outlet dealership in village Deoban, District Kaithal. During the course of hearing, it is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondent-corporation like other Oil Companies, has laid down the mechanism in terms whereof an aggrieved person can make a complaint which shall be duly investigated. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of at this stage with liberty to the petitioner to submit his complaint within a period of one C.W.P.No .16237 of 2010 2 week and in the event of such a complaint complaint by him, the respondents shall enquire into and dispose of the same on merits in terms of the Policy, as early as possible. Till then, no LOI shall be issued. Dasti. September 10, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE