72“: 7£70x7 Q >< a’@jg/i 1 N In‘the Court of District Jud e Dur CG. In the matter of Arbitration and Conciliation Act. 1996 M/S Beekay Engineering Corporation, 45-47, Industrial Estate, Nandini Road, Emmi-490026 (Chaatisgarh). - Applicant. Versus t t M/S SJK Steel Plant Limited. Plot N0. 75, Road N0. IO‘C, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad~500 033 (A.P.) Formerly known and styled as “‘SJK Steel Corporation Ltd.” — Respondent. Annlication under section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act. 1996 for grant of Interim measures. ' @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ': BILASPUR Arbitration Appeal No. 7 of 2009 Appellant Versu Respondent M/ s SJK Steel‘ Plant Limited M/ s Beekay Engineering Corporation s APPEAL UNDER SECTION 37 (1) (a) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 DB: Hon’ble Mr. I. M. Quddusi, 85 Hon’ble Mr. Prashant Kumar Mishra, JJ. Shri A. K. Pandey, Advocate for the appellant. O R D E R (oral) (Passed on this 16th day of March, 201 1 ) Per I.M.Quddusi, J. Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant. This arbitration appeal has been filed against the impugned order dated 31.10.2008 passed by the learned District Judge, Durg in M.J.C. No. 4/2007 (M/s Beekay Engineering Corporation Vs. M/s SJK Steel Plant Limited) In the arbitration agreement it is mentioned that the jurisdiction Will lie at Hyderabad only and hence this agreement of both the parties regarding arbitration that the jurisdiction would lie at Hyderabad is binding upon both the parties. The agreement is to be read in toto and not in part. Therefore, learned District Judge, Durg directed to return the application filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to the appellant for proper presentation. We do not find any illegality or impropriety in the impugned order. The appeal deserved to be and is dismissed at the admission stage itself. sdl’ Qw‘wé‘ w. wage