IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 8557 of 1990 with SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 1002 of 1991 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE N.G.NANDI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- WORKMEN OF INGERSOLL RAND (I) LTD Versus FACTORY MANAGER -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 8557 of 1990 MR LN MEDIPALLY for Petitioner No. 1 NANAVATI ASSOCIATES for Respondent No. 1 RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 2 2. Special Civil Application No. 1002 of 1991 NANAVATI ASSOCIATES for Petitioner No. 1 MR LN MEDIPALLY for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE N.G.NANDI Date of decision: 27/12/2002 COMMON ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. On joint request by learned advocate appearing for the parties, both these petitions have been called from the office and are taken up as desired by learned counsel for the parties. Settlement signed by learned advocate appearing for the parties has been placed on record of these petitions, with a prayer that the impugned award be modified in terms of the settlement. Mr. Medipalli, learned advocate for the workmen union has signed the said settlement and Mr. K.D. Gandhi has signed settlement on behalf of the management. 2. It is suggested from the settlement placed on record that the reinstatement granted under the impugned award is being settled by lump sum payment to the individual workman as stated in the statement attached to the said settlement. It appears that the dispute between the workmen and the management has been amicably resolved, culminating into the settlement placed on record. 3. In view of the above, the impugned award is modified in terms of the settlement as above. The management is directed to make payment pursuant to the settlement to the workmen as mentioned in the settlement, indicating the amount against each of the workmen, within two weeks from today. Petitions disposed of accordingly. Rule discharged with no order as to costs in the petitions. Dt: 27-12-2002 ( N.G. Nandi, J) /vgn