1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3098 OF 2008 IN APPEAL LD. NO.425 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO.511 OF 1994 Govind Waman Bhide. ...Appellant. Vs. Prabhakar Shankar Bhide & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr. V.M. Waghela for the Appellant. Mr. Rajesh Shah i/b. Soloman & Co. for Respondent Nos.1, 2, 3A & 3B. Mr.Parag Kale for Respondent No.7. ..... CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. January 14, 2009. P.C. : Heard. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion and particularly the fact that another appeal (Appeal (Lodg) No.858 of 2007) preferred by one of the co-owners has already been admitted and the proceedings in furtherance of the preliminary decree, the Court has been informed, is stayed, we are of the considered opinion that sufficient cause has been shown for 2 condonation of delay. The Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). CHIEF JUSTICE Dr.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.