1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.722 OF 2009 ... Audumbar Bhausaheb Nehatrao ...Petitioner v/s. The State of Maharashtra & ors...Respondents ... Mr.S.N.Deshpande for the Petitioner. Ms.S.S.Bhende, AGP for Respondent No.1. Ms.Neeta Karnik for Respondent No.2. ... CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, & K.K.TATED, JJ DATED:26th November, 2009 P.C.: The Petitioner is seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Respondent No.2 to appoint him on compensate ground as a Driver, Junior Clerk or Typist. 2. The defence of the Respondent No.2 is 2 that the father of the Petitioner was working under the Pune Region, who expired while in service and therefore the Petitioner was placed at serial No.1 of the waiting list of the candidates to be appointed on compassionate ground. However, so far as the Pune region is concerned, the Respondent No.2 do not have sufficient work at Pune region and therefore, there is no question of any recruitment at Pune region. and therefore in the submission of the learned Counsel the court should not issue a writ of mandamus directing them to appoint the Petitioner. 3. The Petitioner had made a grievance that one Ganesh H. Bharane , whose name was at serial No.2 in the waiting list and whose father had died after the father of the Petitioner had died has been appointed. 3 4. Firstly, the appointment of Mr.Ganesh Bharane is not challenged in this petition. He is also not joined as a party to the petition. It appears that Ganesh Bharane was appointed in the year 2003 in Latur region and not in Pune region. If there is no work available in Pune region, it will not be appropriate to force the Respondent No.2 to employ the Petitioner at Pune region. Petition is, therefore, rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (K.K.TATED, J.)