^ IN THE HIGH GOURT OF JTJDICATURE AT BILASPB'R<C.G.) 7 PETmONER V? ^y^ /^/r '.<^y ^z/ VERSUS 1. W.P. NOJ^.3.27f/2003 y Dharmendra Neekhara Aged about 39 years S/0'^hri SitaramNeekhara 5ub Engineer Sub Divisional OfBcer,Hasdeo Sub Minor SubDivisional No. 3 Nandeli Bhata, Sakti Department ofWater Resourees District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department ofWater Resources D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya Rmpur (Chhattisgarh) Union oflndia ThroughDirector Department ofPersonnel and Training Ministry ofPersonnel, Public GrievEUices and Pensiori Govemment oflndia Roomno. 312, LokNayakBhawan 3riFlooi,KhanMarket , (State Reorganisation Cell) Khan Market, New Delhi- 110003 State OfMadhya Pradesh Through The Prineipal Secretary Department of'Water Resourees Mairtralaya, Vallabh Bhawari '. Bhopal^M.P.) 1 i! 3S .,>',, WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 2^/227"0£3E'JBU; CONSTITUTION OF mPIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPKIATE WRtTSfaK,CERTIORAR[ AND MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR FURTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS : XI-HC-22 STI^T^T h-u'v sffl^r sffl ^iisTt "ff^ -^l^lctl, ^^ti'llo, facdti^ ^^. 3IT^T •q^g; ^ tO.f.^o^ (s.?^ HWM ^^^•--•••••••-•••--•--••-•••-^2003 'ftre^at' sn^r ??gTWHfeg 11.7.2003 Petitioner(s) by Shri Sanc State 'by Shri Rajesh Pan ShriV.V.S. Miirtliy, Addl Counsel for the Union of India Shri R.S. Jha, Deputy' Ac M.P. . Heard finally. Cotuisel for the petitioi suppUed the copies of the couiisel for Uie SLate of C.G./ However, one extra acknowlcdgcmcnts thcrcof bc Counsel for the petitione| are .sqiiarely covered by th| jSW^No.2353/2002 (Mahesh K| santf others) decided on 28.4.J orders auay be passed iri tlies^ ^ItSls stated that itiegstatemert (eep Dubey, advocate. tley, Gov&rnnient Advocate. Central Govemment Standing tvocate General for the State of s:^ 's'&f' :;ii-'; ^ GoTinseIlor1:H<Bfc^p6nd4nts ivetapproached BS^tedly anfl 'si<ifeT<fr"T^w^ ^ Ts^\ ^.f^R^rc ^? 3t!;diT an^r lers submits that they have pe|titions with Annexures to the ;.P. aiid Uie Uluou of Iiidia. :opy be suppUed and fhe )btaincd. '(s) submits thatthese matters decision of fhis Coiu-t in umar Tiwari Vs. Union oflndia 2003. They pra^^that stmilar casea alsoa&^they are similar. is maEle at^lliB^Bar after due snbmit (ftagtHe petitkffiers it is not possible to decide thfi [^t^ ^Ra^ 1i !i!Ii: XJ-HC-22 an^rw K-Ull 3V^ 50HW Vt^r TS? 'ilHMf, 9-^WQ, PtdlUy 3TT^T •q'R; KIKWI Sh-t(rai 'WI. 200 fa+II^I' <xA»g«ire<^rftd "2-' reprRsenrations ~hy the Centra schedule as mentioned in 1? 28.4.22003. Co.unsel for the to dispute this. They, howevi considered. Accordingly, relying on tl for the parties on tfae instruc petitions are disposed of wifU iy.P.Afo..2353/02 (Mahesh Indid. aitd others) decided modification that the petitionj detailed representation raising| docuiueiits vvillmi Leii day; Oovemment addressed to Departinent of Personnel and Publlc Grievances and Market, New Delhi (State Reo^ the representation duly suppoj be also served on? fhe concel Sfates ofter obtauung^.the acl ^fatessHiay fonKa.n|;1|^same 1|c their^Goinaients anjd^tlle requf; detedls in. order to enable tfaiel IQtfnar Pensl<}ns «ni<<(<i4i ii*i<n( 4 fe<A tFif-yit ^•Bpwsn^r Oovemment wit.hin T.he rime j.P.No. 2353/2003 decided on stltloners are not in a posiuon tr, pray that their matters be le statement made by couiisel ftions received, as stated, the the observations as made in Tlwari Vs. Union of (an 28.4.3003 subject to the ;rs, tf so desire, may make a [their grievanees alongwith the froiu today lo Uie Ceiitral the Oovftmment of Tndia, tFainiag, Ministiy ofPersonnel, i, Loknayak Bhawan, Khan ^ganisation Cell). Said copy of -ted by aU relevant documents ined Departnient;|of both the mowledgeineiit ariid both the the CentTatGovemmeiit with iite mforraa.tibn and complete Ccntral Ooveminent to decide [^^fe^ ,•1 '„;.( f l'li ^•l fiM itiffl 118 1111 JI!B XI-HC-22 "y^ '^lf'ili^rif.l i?^^;^^ Id^I^qj •T>-fe ; aiI^TW h-v* ai^i ^>^tcf> +if^a ^.o/' 31T^T "q^q? *<INrtTait<|ch "Wi, 200 fN^y' 31T^[?raiW-H)N -1,. rhe reprRsentation. Tt. is open seek such further irtfonnatiorl <*w!<-i4'H •qroff^ft^l'tfsn^R ^sipOTan^T to t.he Central Govemment to frora the State GoveiTinients and on such reqmsltlon b^ing ma^e from the Central Govemment; the State Govem^aents wUl supply the sanie. On such representation beuig m may consider and decide the appropriate orders as deemed| ide, the Central Goverrunent same expeditiously by passing fit and proper, in accordance with law. In view of the above, Ip.W.P and I.A-, if any, stand disposed of. Certified copy as per rul^ s. Sd/- Eakhruddin Judge , ^ J ,-1 [•^^gq