/ 1 / IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 762 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.630 OF 2008 Gulam Rasul Noormohammad Mahidas @ Pappu ....Appellants Vs. The State of Maharashtra ....Respondents --- Shri R.V. Gupta for Appellants Mr. Rajesh More APP for State ---- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED 17TH OCTOBER, 2008 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel on behalf of the Applicant and the learned Counsel for the State. The Applicant has convicted for the offence punishable under section 392 r/w. 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The only evidence against the present Applicant is in the form of recovery of Rs.50,000/- and motor cycle, which was allegedly used in the commission of offence. Admittedly, the Complainant had not identified the Applicant. Since there is no other evidence against the Applicant, except recovery of an amount of Rs.50,000/-. In my view, the Applicant has made out prima facie case for grant of bail. Applicant be released on bail in a sum of Rs.5,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount. He shall, however, report to DCB-CID once in a week. The Applicant shall furnish one local surety either from / 2 / Bombay or from Thane District. Application is disposed of. V.M. KANADE J.