IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI WRIT PETITION NO : 5000 of 1994 Between: 1.Payyavula Venkaiah, S/o.Guravaiah, aged about 40 years, Purimitla Village, Mullamuru Mandal, Prakasam District. 2.Payyavula Anjaiah, S/o.Guravaiah, aged about 35 years, Purimitla Village, Mullamuru Mandal, Prakasam District. 3.Payyavula Pullaiah, S/o.Ramaiah, Aged about 70 years, Purimitla Village, Mullamuru Mandal, Prakasam District. 4.Payyavula Babulu, S/o.Ramaiah, aged about 65 years, Purimitla Village, Mullamuru Mandal, Prakasam District. 5.Payyavula Papaiah, S/o.Ramaiah, aged about 60 years, Purimitla Village, Mullamuru Mandal, Prakasam District. 6.Katari Venkata Swamy,S/o.Venkateswarlu, aged about 70 years, Gopala Nagaram Street, Ongole, Prakasam District. 7.Shaik Peda Subhan, S/o.Sidda Saheb, aged about 35 years, Marella village, Mullamuru Mandal, Prakasam District. 8.Gosula Jalamma, W/o.Kotaiah, aged about 60 years. Purimitla Village, Mullamuru Mandal, Prakasam District. 9.Vontipuli Jama Dagni, S/o.Veeraiah, aged about 45 years, Marella village, Mullamuru Mandal, Prakasam District. 10.Meenigi Lingaiah, S/o.Nagaiah, aged about 60 years, Purimitla Village, Mullamuru Mandal, Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1.The Land Reforms Tribunal(Revenue Divisional Officer), Kandukur, Prakasam District. 2.The Mandal Revenue Officer, Mullamuru Mandalam,Prakasam District. 3.Darisi Venkata Subbamma,Purimitla Village, Mullamuru Mandal, Prakasam District. ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inclusion of the Petitioners’ lands Ac.22-92 cents in S.Nos.419/1/2 and 419/1/A of Purimitla village, Mullamuru Mandal, Prakasam District in the Holding of the third respondent as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and issue consequential direction to the first respondent to delete the petitioners’ lands from the Holding of the third respondent and to pass such other order or orders as the Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.D.KRISHNA MURTHY (Not present) Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: Nobody appears for the petitioners. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non- appearance and non-prosecution. No costs. -------------- 5th August, 2004 LUR To: 1.The Land Reforms Tribunal (Revenue Divisional Officer), Kandukur, Prakasam District. 2.The Mandal Revenue Officer, Mullamuru Mandalam,Prakasam District. 3.Two CCs to the G.P. for Revenue, High Court Buildings, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (O.U.T.) 4.Two CD copies.