IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 16008 of 1999 Between: 1 J. Balwant Reddy, S/o Late China Bal Reddy, R/o H.No.19-4-1/69, Falaknuma, Jangaammel, Hyderabad. 2 J. Chandrapal Reddy, S/o Late China Bal Reddy, R/o H.No.19-4-1/69, Falaknuma, Jangaammel, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Government of A,P. Rep by Secretaty, Revenue Department Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Joint Collector, Hyderabad District 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer Hyderabad, 4 The Mandal REvenue Officer, Charminar. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particulalry one in the nautre of writ, of Mandamuis declaring the impugned order passed by the joint Collector, Hyderabad, 2nd respondent in B2/2911/93 dt:3-5-99 as arbtrary, illegal, discriminatory and unconsitutional and grant such other necessary relief or reliefs as may be deemed fit and appropriate in the circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.RAGHAVA CHARYULU Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.16008 of 1999 ORDER: Sri K.Ratnam, learned Counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners had taken away the bundle from his office long ago and that they have no instructions to appear in the matter. Since no other counsel has entered appearance on behalf of the petitioners, it is evident that the petitioners have made no alternative arrangements for being represented through counsel. The writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No costs. ______________ 13.08.2008 GS