IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM FRIDAY, THE 27TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 8TH PHALGUNA 1930 LA.App..No. 421 of 2008() ------------------------- LAR.32/2003 of SUB COURT,THODUPUZHA .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENTS: -------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.K.BABU RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANT/OCCUPANT CLAIMANT: ------------------------------------------ 1. AYSHA, W/O. HAMEED, PUTHIYAKUNNEL, THODUPUZHA. 2. SAYED MUHAMMED, S/O. HAMEED, PUTHIYAKUNNEL, THODUPUZHA. 3. MUHAMMED, PUTHIYAKUNNEL, THODUPUZHA. 4. IBRAHIM, PUTHIYAKUNNEL, THODUPUZHA. 5. SULAIMAN, PUTHIYAKUNNEL, THODUPUZHA. 6. ABDUL JABBAR, PUTHIYAKUNNEL, THODUPUZHA. 7. NAZEER, PUTHIYAKUNNEL, THODUPUZHA. LAA.NO.421/08 8. SALIM, PUTHIYAKUNNEL, THODUPUZHA. 9. AANSARI, PUTHIYAKUNNEL, THODUPUZHA. 10. MISSIRI AMMAL, D/O. HAMEED, PUTHIYAKUNNEL, THODUPUZHA. 11. JAMEELA, D/O. HAMEED, PUTHIYAKUNNEL, THODUPUZHA. 12. ARIFFA, D/O. HAMEED, PUTHIYAKUNNEL, THODUPUZHA. 13. SAFIA, D/O. HAMEED, PUTHIYAKUNNEL, THODUPUZHA. 14. SALMA, W/O. NAZEER, PUTHIYAKUNNEL, RATHAPPALLY KAVALA, THODUPUZHA EAST P.O. ADV. SRI.M.G.KARTHIKEYAN THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L.A.A.No.421 OF 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 27th day of February, 2009 JUDGMENT Pius.C.Kuriakose, J. Having gone through the impugned judgment, we are of the view that the learned Subordinate Judge was justified in relying on Ext.A2. It is brought to our notice that this court has approved Ext.A2 by judgment in L.A.A.No.506/2008. In fact this court gave approval to Ext.A2 relying on the appellate judgment against Ext.A5 judgment referred to in L.A.A.No.506/2008 which is common judgment in L.A.A.No.121/2008 series. Having gone through the judgment in L.A.A.No.506/2008 and the common judgment in L.A.A.No.121/2008 series, we are of the view that there is no warrant for interfering with the impugned judgment. The appeal will stand dismissed. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM JUDGE sv.