(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 400 OF 2010 Smt. Saleha Kausar d/o. Abu Syed Masood, Age : 19 years, Occupation : Nil - Student, R/o. Beside Sana Manzil, Meraj Nagar, Near Mohmmadi Masjid, Rameshwar Plots, Dist. Parbhani. .. Petitioner. versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary, Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 400 032. 2. Dr. Zakir Hoosain D.Ed. College, Parbhani, Through its Principal. 3. The Principal, District Institute of Education & Training, Parbhani. 4. Maharashtra State Examination Council, Pune, through its Chairman. 5. The Head Master, Municipal Council Primary School, Anand Nagar, Parbhani. .. Respondents. (2) ....................... Mr. Ajay S. Deshpande, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. K.G. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.1. Mr. A.B. Tele, Advocate, for respondent no.2. Mr. A.R. Nikam, Advocate, for respondent no.4. ........................ CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & R.M. BORDE, JJ. DATE : 29TH NOVEMBER 2010 COURT'S ORDER (Per B.R. Gavai, J.) : 1. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner has moved this Court for modification of the order dated 23rd November 2010. 2. Mr. A.S. Deshpande, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that vide the said order, this Court has permitted the petitioner to continue the second year D.T.Ed. (3) course during the academic year 2011-12. He submits that, however, the classes for the academic year 2010-11 have commenced very recently and only 12 working days have been completed so far. 3. Mr. A.B. Tele, learned Counsel appearing for respondent no.2 / College, on instructions, submits that the classes have commenced from 1st October 2010. 4. Vide order dated 23rd November 2010, it has been directed that only in the event, the petitioner completes the requisite attendance, she would be permitted to appear for the said examination. We, therefore, see no reason to deny modification, inasmuch as, it is at the risk of the petitioner. 5. In the result, the motion is allowed. In the order dated 23rd November 2010, in para 2, instead of "academic year 2011-12", it shall be read as "academic year 2010-11", meaning thereby, the petitioner shall be permitted to appear for the second year D.T.Ed. course during the academic year 2010-11. Needless to state, that the petitioner shall take admission in accordance with the rules, which shall be granted by the respondent no.2 / College on payment of requisite fees. (4) The necessary correction in the order dated 23rd November 2010 be made accordingly. ( R.M. BORDE ) ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE ......................... bgp/wpetition400