IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 4TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 15TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 3957 of 2008(U) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ C.G. THANKACHAN, CHARAKKAL CASHEW INDUSTRIES, UMMANNOOR P.O., KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT) (REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER). BY ADV. SRI.S.ABDUL RAZZAK RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICE, SPECIAL CIRCLE, KOLLAM. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICE, KOLLAM. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KOTTARAKKARA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI C.K.GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) 3957 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated: February 4, 2008 JUDGMENT Aggrieved by Exts.P6 and P7 rectification orders to the extent interest is levied from the date of assessment order, the petitioner has filed Exts.P9 and P10 revision petitions. It is stated that the aforesaid revision petitions along with Exts.P11 and P12 stay petitions, are pending consideration of the 2nd respondent. While orders are awaited, the respondents have issued Ext.P13 notice to dispose of certain immovable properties and it is in this background that the writ petition has been filed challenging Ext.P13 notice issued under the Revenue Recovery Act. 2. Having regard to the fact that Exts.P9 and P10 revisions filed against Exts.P6 and P7 are pending consideration of the 2nd respondent, I dispose of this writ petition directing that the 2nd respondent shall consider and pass orders on Exts.P6 and P7 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment, after issuing notice WP(C) 3957/08 Page numbers to the petitioner. In the meantime, all further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P13 will stand deferred. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-