Crl.M. No. M-10940 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M-10940 of 2009 Date of decision : 11.5.2009. ... Seema ................ Petitioner vs. State of Punjab and another .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. Viney Puri, Advocate for Sh. D.K. Bhatti, Advocate for the petitioner. Sh. A.P.S. Mann, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab ... K.C. Puri, J. (Oral) As per allegation of the prosecution, one Damyanti set the law in motion by stating that Salma @ Nikki d/o Jalal-u-din was residing with her voluntarily and is working as teacher in the school. Father and brother of Salma @ Nikki wanted to take her back forcibly but she refused to go with them. Ultimately, on the day of occurrence, Jalal-u-din, Raju, Raja, Irshad, Pinki, one Sahib alongwith one lady namely, Radha and Lady President (Pardhan) Seema alongwith 3-4 other ladies, entered the Ist floor of the house of the complainant by using ladder to take Salma @ Nikki forcibly alongwith them. On her refusal, they ransacked the house of the complainant and took Crl.M. No. M-10940 of 2009 -2- jewellery, ear rings, two bangles, two necklaces, two rings, gold and Rs.50,000/- in cash and mobile phone of Kamaljit Singh. They also threatened to kill 7 months' old child. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a social worker. Salma @ Nikki has supported the version of prosecution. Even the stolen articles have not yet been recovered. So, no extraordinary circumstance for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. Consequently, the petition stands dismissed. ( K.C. Puri ) 11.5.2009. Judge chugh