IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 25TH OCTOBER 2011 / 3RD KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 20639 of 2011(D) ---------------------- PETITIONER : --------------------- P.K.RAMACHANDRAN, S/O.KITTU, POOVATHINKAL HOUSE, THRIKKATHAYA DESOM, ELANAD VILLAGE, THALAPPILLY TALUK, PO ELANAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT 680 586. BY ADVS. SRI.M.R.DHANIL SRI.JOBY JOSEPH (THRISSUR) RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. JANARDHANAN, S/O.KITTU, POOVATHINKAL HOUSE, THRIKKATHAYA DESOM, ELANAD VILLAGE, THALAPPILLY TALUK, PO ELANAD, CHELAKKARA VIA, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 586. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, THALAPPILLY TALUK, VADAKKENCHERRY, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 582. 3. ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, THALAPPILLY TALUK, VADAKKENCHERRY, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 582. 4. TALUK SURVEYOR, THALAPPILLY TALUK, VADAKKENCHERRY, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 582. R2 TO R4 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- WP(C).No. 20639 of 2011(D) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE COMPROMISE FILED BEFORE THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN FAO NO. 257/2008 DATED 11.12.2008. EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE DECREE DATED 09.11.2009 PASSED IN O.S. NO. 1098/2004 ON THE FILES OF THE SUBORDINATE JUDGE'S COURT, THRISSUR. EXT.P3 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 05.05.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE TAHSILDAR, THALAPPILLY. EXT.P4 : COPY OF THE CHALLAN DATED 05.05.2011 BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT. EXT.P5 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 02.06.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE TAHSILDAR, THALAPPILLY. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS - NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mn ANTONY DOMINIC, J --------------------------------------- W.P(C) No.20639 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of July, 2011. J U D G M E N T Prayer sought for in this writ petition is to consider Ext.P3 application made by the petitioner before the 2nd respondent for resurvey and demarcation of the property. 2. If as stated by the petitioner such an application made by him has been received and is pending, it is directed that necessary action shall be taken as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within eight weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. 3. It is also directed that such action will be taken only with notice to the 1st respondent. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed anything on merits. 4. Petitioner to produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. The Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC ab JUDGE