1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3627/2007 IN SECOND APPEAL No 230/2007 (Kailas s/o Manik Aroo and another vs.Kausalyabai Rameshwar Sarda and another ) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Advocate for applicant absent Coram : A.P.BHANGALE, J. Dated : 16 th November, 2009 Applicants as well as their Advocate are absent. Mr C.A.Joshi, learned Advocate for respondents strongly objected grant of stay on the ground that the plaintiff/decree holder was found in possession of the suit field and if any relief is granted by way of stay etc.in favour of the applicants, they would disturb the possession which is held by the trial Court in favour of the plaintiff and confirmed by the first Appellate Court. Application is rejected. JUDGE. sahare