IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.321 of 2010 1. SMT. PRAMLATA SINGH W/O SANJAY SINGH R/O VILL- FALKAHA, P.S. FALKAHA (NARPATGANJ), DISTT. ARARIA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE ARARIA 3. ADDL. SECRETARY (HOME SPECIAL) DEPTT. OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA 4. PRINCIPAL SECRETARIAT (HOME SPECIAL) DEPTT. OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA ----------- 2. 08.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner holds a valid licence under Form 13 and 14 of the Arms Act but the same is being denied to her under Form 11 and 12. Counsel for the State points out from the impugned order of the State Government dated 22.1.2008 that since the physical location was in proximate to the Indo-Nepal, it was not in public interest to grant her licence for a new shop. If the petitioner holds licence under Form 13 and 14 as is contended on her behalf and seeks additional licence in Form 11 and 12, that shall not classify as a licence for a fresh shop. The petitioner appears to be desiring the additional licences in an existing shop. The order dated 22.1.2008 is therefore 2 not sustainable in its present form. It is accordingly set aside. Let the respondents pass a fresh reasoned and speaking order dealing with the contention of the petitioner that she does hold a valid licence under Form 13 and 14 and desires a licence in Form 11 and 12 to conduct business from the same premises and dispose off the matter by a reasoned and speaking order. The writ application stands allowed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)