IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CONTEMPT CASE NO : 1421 of 2005 (Contempt Case U/s. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the Respondents herein for violating, disobeying the Order of the High Court dated _______ in WPMP No.________ /WP No. ________ Between: Ch. Bhaskara Chary s/o Sathaiah R/o 2-4-75, Sher Bunglow Nalgonda District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Central Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh limited (CPDCAPL) rep by its Circle, Nalgonda, 2 Sri. D.Subba Rao, Superintendent Engineer Operation Circle, Central Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Limited Nalgonda ( 1st respondent is not necessary party in this CC) .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.R.TAGORE Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.G.VIDYASAGAR The Court made the following: Form-NIC-OGS/CC{BJPR} THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CONTEMPT CASE No.1421 of 2005 In WRTI PETITION No.15954 of 2003 JUDGMENT: The contempt case has been filed complaining that the order passed by this Court on 01.11.2004 in W.P.15954/2003 has been disobeyed by the 2nd respondent. The said writ petition was disposed of holding that on verification of records it was found that the petitioner worked under K2 Agreement No.87/92-93 dated 30.03.2003 i.e., prior to the B.P.Ms.No.235 dated 03.08.1993, and hence, he need not possess typewriting qualification, and accordingly, the respondents are directed to consider his case and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, if he is otherwise qualified under B.P.Ms No.36 dated 18.05.1997, while setting aside the impugned order therein dated 14.04.2003. It is stated that pursuant to the orders of this Court, the respondents have considered the case of the petitioner and rejected his case vide letter of the 2nd respondent dated 28.02.2006 on the ground that the petitioner has not come within the zone of vacancies available for BC-’B’ category in terms of B.P.Ms.No.36 dated 18.05.1997. It is further stated that 50% of vacancies earmarked as per B.P.Ms.No.36 in the cadre of LDC, Nalgonda circle has been filled up except backlog SC/ST vacancies. Since the petitioner does not belong to SC/ST he cannot be considered against the backlog vacancies. It is stated that aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner filed writ petition and the same is pending on the file of this Court. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am of the opinion that it cannot be said that the respondents have willfully disobeyed the orders of this Court as they have passed a speaking order. The Contempt Case is accordingly dismissed. ___________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 15.10.2009 Dsr