IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION 2833 of 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. OF 200 M.S.R.T.C..... Petitioner versus J.D. Palshikar ...... Respondent. Mr. C.M.Lokesh i/b M/s. G.S. Hegde & Associates for the petitioner CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 23RD MARCH, 2007 DATED; 23RD MARCH, 2007 DATED; 23RD MARCH, 2007 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. Leave to amend. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. 2. MSRC has challenged the order passed by the labour court granting reinstatement with continuity of service and full backwages to the respondent employee with effect from 24-9-1986, which has been confirmed by the industrial court by dismissing the revision filed by the petitioner. During pendency of this petition, parties have resolved the dispute and consent terms are placed on record. The petitioner has agreed to pay 75% of the backwages instead of full backwages and the respondent has agreed to receive the same towards full and final settlement of the claim. Consent Terms duly signed by the parties and counsel are placed on record and a joint prayer is made to dispose of the writ petition in consent terms. The consent terms is taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification. Hence writ petition is dipsosed of in Consent terms. It is made clear that the petitioner shall pay the amount of 75% of the back wages towards full and final settlement of the respondent’s claim as awarded by the labour court, by paying it to the widow of the deceased employee, within a period of four weeks from today. C.A is accordingly allowed.