-E HISH COJKT W CHHATTESS<<RH AT BILAW^R W. P.{S) No. 2626 of 2007 Versus 1. Milap Ram Attbhaiya Aged about 43 years, S/o. Shri Jagawiath Attbhaiya Assistant Teacher, Primwy Schoot Mntwcidatal 2. Smt. Sushma Tnakur Aged about 45 Years, W/o. Shri Sui'yoprakash Thakur, Assistant Tencher, Primcry (Sirls School Kmker 3. Hemchand Sirrfia Aged about 44 Years, S/o. Shri Ram Lal Sinha Assistant Teacher. Primary SchoolBcgodar 4. A. 2. 3. 4. 5. Smt. Nanda about 39 Years, W/o. Shri M.R. Attbhciya Assistant Teacher, Primcry Sirts School Knnker All are at Block Kcnker, Distt. Kanker (C.ff.) State of Chhnttisgarh, Throigh Secr-etcry, School Educotion Depesrtment. &.K.S. Bhawen, Raipur(C.6,5 The &ireetor Public Instruction bepartment Raipur (C.©.) District Educaton Officer Kanker District Kanker (C.©.) Block Education Officer Knnker- (C.6.5 Treosury <& Funds Ciepartment Kanker (C.6.) Writ Petition under Article 226 of the ConstityTjoji of India SB; Hon'ble Shri Justice Sotish K. ^nihotri. Present: Mr. E?.N. Prajapati, Advocote for the petitioners. AAs. Sunitc Jain, Panei Laifyer' for the State/respondents. OR&ER (Passsd on this l*t t>cy of May, 2007) 1. The question of l<w involved herein is asto whether the petitioners are entitled to regutw pay scale w.e.f. the date of initi.al appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. 2. Learned eounsel appeoring for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointiy submit that the facts and questiai of law involved in the present writ pefition are the some <ss to that of i'n W. P. (S) No. 5976/2(x36 (Sushil Tiwari and others vs. State ©overnment of Chhattisgarh &others), which wos allowed vide order dated 7.11.2X)6. Svkha.sh 3. In view of the above-stoted submissions made fcy learned eounse! for the parties, the wr-it petition is allowed in the some terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge