IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8210 of 2008 CHANDESHWAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 13.5.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioner and the A.P.P. representing the State. The petitioner is an accused under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and allied offences. The counsel for the petitioner submits that even if the allegation is taken to be correct, the only allegation against the petitioner is that he was a member of a armed mob and some armed member of mob have already been granted bail by this Court. In this connection he has referred to statement made in paragraph no. 9 of this bail application which shows that Sanjay Yadav, Chandarik Yadav and Dhirendra Yadav have also been granted bail by this Court. Considering the fact that the petitioner has also stated in paragraph no.8 of the bail application that there is no criminal antecedent and that co-accused abovenamed having same allegation have already been granted bail by this Court and further that the allegation of causing fatal injury is at Kishori Yadav, Karu Yadav, Birendra Yadav and Jitendra Yadav, this Court is enclined to grant bail to the petitioner Chandeshwar Yadav in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 6/2006 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya. The Trial Court, however, before granting bail to the petitioner, would verify with regard to the criminal antecedent of the petitioner. It is, however, made clear that one of bailers must be either wife or the mother of the petitioner. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)