IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12101 of 2010 BHOLA NATH NEOGI, son of Late Krishna Chandra Neogi, resident of Neogi Villa, P.S. Jakkanpur, Patna-1. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Principal Secretary, H.R.D., Patna. 2. Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna. 3. Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna. 4. Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 2.8.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Board as also the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 31st of October, 2002 as an Assistant from the service of the respondent-Board, the benefit of Assured Career Progression (ACP) as extended to the other employees of the Board is not given to the petitioner. Resultantly, the petitioner is not receiving the full pensionary benefit. The petitioner had filed representations, however, the respondent-Board has not considered the grievances of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent-Board submits that the claims of the petitioner need to be verified from the record as well as the Scheme/revised Scheme in question. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner had represented his grievances earlier, however, for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna (respondent no.3). 2 In case such a representation is filed stating the details of his grievances as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the grievances of the petitioner be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled. Upon consideration, in case the representation of the petitioner finds favour, the authority concerned shall issue the revised sanction order for payment of the admissible pensionary benefits. The representation of the petitioner be disposed of by a reasoned order and a copy thereof may also be sent to the petitioner by post under registered cover. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)