1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 415/2010. (Shankar Bhujaji Gadekar & others Vs. M/s M.K. Mahendale Transport Pvt. Ltd. & others) ...................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ...................................................................................................................................................................... Mr. A.M. Gedam, Advocate for Petitioner. ... CORAM : R. K.DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 15th APRIL, 2011. By this application under Section 24 r/w Section 125 of the CP.C., the transfer of Application No. 62/1995 pending in the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Raigarh has been sought to the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Pusad, District Yavatmal. Notice in this matter was issued on 04.05.2010. Thereafter on 12.08.2010 again notice was issued to respondent No. 1 and 4. Thereafter again fresh notice was issued to respondent No. 4 on 29.10.2010. On 13.01.2011 the applicant had served the respondent No. 4 by paper publication issued. In spite of service of notice non appeared for the respondents on 16.03.2011 and hence the matter was adjourned for providing one more opportunity to the respondents. On 30.03.2011 non had appeared for the respondents. Today also non appears for the respondents. Hence, the matter is taken up for final hearing. The applicants have expressed 2 inconvenience in attending the proceedings at Raigarh. The averments made in the application are not controverted by the respondents by filing reply. The learned counsel for the applicants has relied upon the judgment of the learned Single Judge of this Court in Padminbai Ashok Yadle & others Vs. Mannan Ismail Shaikh & others reported in 2002(3) Mh.L.J. 311 in which the claim petition pending before the Tribunal at Latur was transferred to the Tribunal at Palghar, District Thane. In view of the fact that the averments made in the application remained uncontroverted, I am satisfied that the case is made out for transfer of the proceedings. Hence, the application is allowed. Claim Petition No. 62/1995 pending in the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Raigarh is transferred to the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Pusad, District Yavatmal. The application is allowed. No costs. JUDGE NSN