5? ITLTHE HON^BLEHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, CHHATTISGARH at BILASPUR ^•j>- 1395/o^ PETITIONER >^ ^ ,4...... , ^... \^-:-()^ ....-•^s%s£i- ^ft..--",,,¥;l"V^.1-' ^^""'^ y^'A...--" A^-" R. C. BHATTACHARYA S/o Late Shri. C.C.Bhattacharya Aged about 59 Years, Employed as Chargeman, Telecom Factory, Hathkhoj, BHILAI - 490026 Dt. Durg (CG) Residing at: B/6 Palash Enclave Ispat Nagar, Risali, Bhilai (CG). VERSUS ?-.r=-i?,ng%i S ,i£^l?i \ RESPONDENTS 1. ^c '^r' \v^ y.MG^ .^tfiSB^y^JS^' 2. 3. ./-' Union oflndia Through: The Secretary, Minista-y of Communications, Deptt. ofTelecommunications, Sanchar Bhavan, 20 Ashoka Road, New Delhi. The ChiefGeneral Manager, (Telecom Factory) Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited 7 Floor, Statesman House, B-148, Barakhambha Road, Cannaught Place, New Delhi. The ChiefGeneral Maaager, Telecom Factories Circle, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Wright Town, JABALPUR (MP) The Chief Administrative Officer, Telecom Factory, (B.S.N.L.) Hathkhoj, BfflLAI - 490026 (CG) ia KB [/^t n• ^^Ms WRtT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE _226 _/ _227 _OF _THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA_ JFQR_ THE _ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE ORDER AND DIRECTION^ IN_THE_NATURE OF CERTIORARY. MANDAMUS ETC. XI-HC-22 SII^TW K-i an^sr fl?<ii<pflFBd GOWR y^' vj-crei -yiyic<'>y,~uTt1<«<is,Rrtiti^t '':: •., an^?T I^ra>.^rtn I^L' 'To1i7'^l3^i0^: qraHI^ffiR •"•••••••••••••"""••"•""""" W[ 200 f^ET an^srsTarw^feT 27-3.200e Shri B.P. Rao, (jounsel ror the petitioner. Shri S.K. Beri\n<al, Lawyer for the Unjon respondentNo.1. - Heard. Order p.assed; Signedanddatedl Tyijied separateiy. *l«tri41-ltllHriWfe'^lxRl'ccK ^3lf^T3II^?t , Sr. Panel of India/ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge (<i»^te» 'y -T=^. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J WRIT PETITIQN N0.1393 OF 2006 GOWRI Petitioner Resoondents Versus R.C. Bhattacharya Union of India & Others Present :- Shri B.P. Rao, counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.K. Beriwai, Sr. Panel Lawyer for the Union of tndia/respondent No.1. ORDER (Passed on 27" March, 20Q6) Learned counset for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is working as Chargeman in the Telecom Factory at Bhilai since 3-9-1981. The petitioner has fiied certain representations before the respondent authorities vide Annexure-P/5 & P/6 for financial up-gradation. The petitioner has fited this petition praying that respondents No.2 and 3 be directed to consider the petitioner's pending representations. Learned counsei appearing for respondent No.1 has no objection. Accordingly, respondents No.2 and 3 are directed to consider the representations Annexure-P/5 dated NIL and Annexure-P/6 dated 31-3-2005 submitted by the petitioner, if pending, wrthin a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in accordance with law. For the reasons stated above, the petition siands disposed of. No order as to costs. Consequently, I.A.No.3042/2006 also stands disposed of. SQ/- Satisb K. Agnihotri Judge !~~ r-