IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40649 of 2009 RANJEET PANDEY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 26.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Petitioner is an accused for the offence under sections 366(A), 379/120B of the Indian Penal Code in relation to Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 183 of 2009. Allegation is that the petitioner along with some other persons kidnapped the minor girl, namely, Mamta Kumari when she went to withdraw some money from the Magadh Gramin Bank on 16.5.2009. Submission of learned counsel is that the girl in her statement under section 164 of the Cr. P.C. has given all kinds of story which do not seem to be probable. Though the police even found the case to be a case of mistake of fact, submitted a chargesheet implicating the petitioner and some other accused in the case. Petitioner is willing to cooperate in the trial, if he is enlarged on bail. For the reasons that there are many inconsistencies emerging in the statement, let the petitioner, namely, Ranjeet Pandey be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 183 of 2009. Both - 2 - the sureties to be executed by blood relation of the petitioner on due identification by the court below. Petitioner will not intimidate or threaten the witnesses and cooperate in the trial by appearing on each every date fixed in the case either by himself or through his counsel. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)