1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4987 OF 2010 Rajabhau s/o Raghunathrao Mundhe ... PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri R.L. Kute, Advocate for petitioner Shri K.J. Ghute Patil, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1, 2 and 6 Shri S.B. Talekar, Advocate for respondent No.3. Shri D.J. Chaudhari, Advocate for respondent No.5. ..... CORAM: P.V. HARDAS & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED: 25th June, 2010 PER COURT : 1. This petition has been circulated before us for speaking to minutes for correction in the operative part of our judgment dated 11/6/2010. Inadvertently, instead of respondent No.6, the name of respondent No.3 has been transcribed. We, therefore, accordingly direct that necessary corrections be carried at page No.5, Line No.2 of our judgment, in which we had stated that, "We accordingly direct that, in the event respondent No.3 passes an order . . . . . . .. ", necessary 2 corrections be carried out to read as follows : "We accordingly direct that, in the event respondent No.6 passes an order ......................". 2. Corrected copies be provided to the parties to act upon. (N.D. DESHPANDE, J.) (P.V. HARDAS, J.) fmp/wp498710