IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14831 of 2011 1. RANVIJAY MANDAL SON OF LATE RUDAL MANDA 2. GYANCHAND MANDAL SON OF LATE SIPAT MANDAL BOTH R/O VILLAGE- BHIKHNA (MAHUWABARI)P.S. RUPOULI (AKBAR), DISTRICT- PURNEA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 06/06/2011 Heard Mr. Vikramdev Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant. Petitioners are accused in a case which has been registered under Sections 307, 379 and other sections of the IPC . Submission is that section 307 IPC is not made out because there were no intervening circumstances. It is further submitted that the parties are on litigating terms which has been mentioned in the FIR itself. Prayer for bail has been opposed by the learned APP assisted by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners above named are directed to be released on furnishing of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No. II/concerned Court, Purnea 2 in Sessions Trial No. 324 of 2011 arising out of Rupouli P.S. Case No. 111 of 2009. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)