1 (WP 7354 of 2010) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7354 OF 2010 Smt. Tarabai Kashinath Gangapurkar and Ors. ...Petitioners Vs. Balasaheb Shivlingappa Gatade & Ors. ...Respondents ----- Mr.Vikas Shivarkar for Petitioners Mr.Ketan A. Chotani for Respondents ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 22nd March, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and the learned counsel for the Respondents. 2. An application filed by the Petitioner-Original Tenant for appointment of the Court Receiver, was rejected by the Trial Court and being aggrieved by the said order, the Petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 3. I have perused the impugned order passed by the Trial Court. The Trial Curt has rightly held that the Court Commissioner cannot be appointed for the purpose of collecting evidence. There is no infirmity or illegality in 2 (WP 7354 of 2010) the order passed by the Trial Court. No case is made out for interfering with the impugned order passed by the Trial Court. Hence, Writ petition is dismissed and disposed of. 4. It is always open for the Petitioner to examine the witnesses for proving his case as pleaded in the written statement. (V.M. KANADE J.)