1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICMTURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Writ Petition No. 284 of 2008 Pralhad v. State of Maharashtra and ors ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr N.D. Khamborkar, Adv for petitioner. Mr A.S. Sonare, APP for respondents Coram : D.D. Sinha and A.P. Bhangale, JJ Dated : 18th December 2008 1. Heard Mr N. D. Khamborkar, learned counsel for petitioner and Mr A.S. Sonare, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for respondents. 2. This Court in the order dated 23rd October 2008 has already mentioned the stand of respondents. This Court wanted to know what is the status of the enquiry initiated against respondent no.7 under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act and, therefore, time was granted to the respondent- State to seek instructions in this regard. Learned Addl. Public Prosecutor on the basis of instructions makes a statement that the 2 enquiry under Section 88 of the said Act shall be completed within a period of three months from today. 3. Mr N.D. Khamborkar, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the liberty may be given to the petitioner to place relevant material before the Enquiry Officer. 4. In the backdrop of the above-referred facts, it appears that enquiry is already initiated against respondent no. 7 under Section 88 of the said Act and in view of the statement made by learned APP, it is evident that the said enquiry shall be completed within a period of three months from today. In that view of the matter, we dispose of this writ petition at this stage with liberty, as prayed for by the petitioner. Judge. Judge. hsj