R.S.A. No. 2622 of 2009 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. R.S.A. No. 2622 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 3, 2009 Gurcharan Singh …..Appellant Vs. Balvir Kaur …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.K.S. Sidhu, Senior Advocate with Mr. G.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the appellant. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay in refiling the appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of. Application under Section 149 CPC in deficiency in Court fee is allowed. Vide impugned judgment and decree the suit of the plaintiff- appellant has been dismissed by the Courts below upholding the validity of R.S.A. No. 2622 of 2009 (O&M) [2] judgment and decree dated May 6, 1985 and February 23, 1988. It has been held as a finding of fact by the Courts below that the said judgments and decrees are not vitiated on the ground of fraud or misrepresentation. After arguing at length, Senior counsel for the appellant has not been able to satisfy this Court regarding the existence of substantial question of law warranting interference in the finding of facts given by the Courts below. No ground is made out for interference. Dismissed. November 3, 2009 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE