IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.9211 OF 2008 AMOD JHA, SON OF BHAGYA NARAYAN JHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BAHILWARA, POLICE STATION SARAIYA, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. LAXMAN CHOUDHARY, SON OF MAHADEP CHAUDHARY 3. SANTOSH CHOUDHARY, SON OF LAKMAN CHAUDHARY 4. SANJAY CHOUDHARY, SON OF LAKMAN CHAUDHARY 2-4 RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ROOP NATH, POLICE STATION SARIYA, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR ………………………………………………………………….OPPOSITE PARTIES ********* FOR THE PETITIONER :- MR. NACHIKETA JHA, ADVOCATE FOR THE S T A T E :- MR. JHARKHANDI UPADHYAY, A.P.P. ************ 2 11/03/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. This application has been filed challenging the order dated 03.01.2008 passed under Section 228 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, allowing the discharge petition to the extent of exempting under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code from the charges under which the Opposite Parties are to be tried. On perusal of the order, I find that the Court below has given good reasons for discharging the Opposite Parties for the offences under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code as according to the Court below, there were not sufficient materials to prima facie show that there was any intention to kill against the informant and other members of his family. 2 I do not find any illegality or irrationality in the order impugned. This application is accordingly dismissed. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)