IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32222 of 2010 SOLEMA KHATOON Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 12.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner once cheated the Selection Committee and now is attempting to cheat this Court by furnishing part of the information after obtaining the same, a provision is shown by the learned counsel that minimum qualification for Anganbari Sevika is Class-VIII pass when no matriculation candidate (Pravesika Uttrin) is available. Information should contain the number of applicants, their qualifications, non-availability of matriculate candidates in the village. In course of submission, it was said that Rs. 60,000/- was given on behalf of the petitioner for her appointment and now Rs. 2,000/- per month is being demanded to allow her to work clearly the case of further crime committed by the petitioner. It is for the Trial Court to take initiative to file a separate case for petitioner’s such act, otherwise finding petitioner’s document forged, her prayer has been earlier rejected by this Court and there is no further merit in case. With the above observation, the application is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)