THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU W.P.No.27732 OF 2011 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking to issue writ of Mandamus declaring action of the respondents in interfering with the construction of building in premises No.9-4-86/138 & 138/P, Salarjung Colony, Hyderabad as illegal and arbitrary, and seeking direction to respondents not to interfere with the construction in the said premises. 2. The case of the petitioners may be stated as follows: The petitioners are the absolute owners and possessors of the aforesaid house. After obtaining building permission, they constructed a joint building. The respondents, at the instance of the petitioners’ neighbour, interfered with their construction and directly issued notice under Section 636 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 (for short, ‘the Act’) on 23.10.2010 and on the same day, as there were minor deviations, demolished part of the construction. So, the petitioners made an application, dated 27.10.2010, to the respondents to grant revised plan, but no action has been taken by the respondents. They also issued notice, dated 02.12.2010, under Section 440 of the Act about the recommencement of the construction and commenced the construction. Again the respondents took away the material on 06.12.2010 and as such, the petitioners issued another registered notice on 08.12.2010. This Court in the writ petition filed by petitioners in W.P.No.2297 of 2011 directed the respondents to pass appropriate orders on the revised plan submitted by them, but respondents have not passed any orders. Petitioners submitted a revised plan by paying necessary fee. They issued notice under Section 440 of the Act on 21.05.2011, but no action has been taken by the respondents. Hence, the writ petition. 3. The grievance of the petitioners is that no action has been taken by the respondents in pursuance of their application, dated 27.10.2010. The writ petition is filed on 03.10.2011 whereas the respondents passed an order on 18.10.2011 rejecting the application for revised plan submitted by the petitioners. Therefore, the remedy of the petitioners, if any, is to challenge the proceedings, dated 18.10.2011, issued by the respondents. 4. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ JUSTICE K.C.BHANU 24th October, 2011. AMD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU W.P.No.27732 OF 2011 Date: 24.10.2011 AMD