IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No. 17376 of 2010 Date of decision August 19, 2011 Rohtash ....... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Rajesh Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. S. Goripuria, DAG., Haryana for the respondents. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. Reply on behalf of the respondents is filed in Court. The same is taken on record. 2. Counsel for the State states that the impugned notice has since been withdrawn. Consequently, the writ petition itself has become infructuous and be disposed of as such. 3. As ordered. 4. The writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 19, 2011 archana