IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.18752 of 2011 Ajit Kumar Singh, son of Shri Chandrama Prasad Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 4. 26.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 14.7.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. 20199 of 2010 on the ground that the Informant had identified him as the person who had given him intoxicated drink. It was submitted on behalf of the petitioner that even before the petitioner was remanded in the present case, he was put on Test Identification Parade , while he was in jail in another case and, thereafter, remanded in the present case. The Test Identification Parade was conducted without any permission from the Court. Considering the aforesaid submission as also that due to no fault of petitioner, the prosecution witnesses are not turning up, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with three sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-IV, Patna, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 11 of 2011 arising out of GRP Patna P.S. Case No. 297 of 2009, subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how 2 he is related with the petitioner, the second bailor shall be the brother of the petitioner namely, Sudhir Kumar Singh and the third bailor must be local since the petitioner belongs to Saran. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)