IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10007 of 2008 ====================================================== Smt. Rukmini Devi , wife of Hanumat Singh, resident of village - Goitha Tola Bhaluhar, P.S. – Bankey Bazar, District - Gaya .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Director of Consolidation, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Joint Director of Consolidation, Gaya, Bihar 4. The Assistant Director of Consolidation, Gaya 5. The Consolidation Officer, Bankey Bazar, Anchal – Amas, District – Gaya 6. Smt. Sudama Devi, wife of Raj Bansh Singh, resident of village - Goitha Tola Bhaluhar, P.S. – Bankey Bazar, District –Gaya 7. Shiv Nandan Sao, son of Late Munshi Sao, resident of village Simpur, P.O. – Bankey Bazar, Anchal – Amas, District – Gaya. 8. Hanumat Singh, son of Late Damri Singh, resident of village – Goitha Tola Bhaluhar, P.S. – Bankey Bazar, District -Gaya 9. Raj Bansh Singh, son of Damri Singh, resident of village - Goitha Tola Bhaluhar, P.S. – Bankey Bazar, District – Gaya 10. Narendra Singh, son of Damri Singh, resident of village – Goitha Tola Bhaluhar, P.S. – Bankey Bazar, District - Gaya. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Prasad Singh Mr. Anita Raghavendra Mr. Abhishek For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Gp15) Mr. Kunwar Nr. Jamuar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 05-04-2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.C. to G.A. No. 5 as well as learned counsel, who has appeared on behalf of respondent no. 6 to 10. In the present writ petition an order passed by Joint Director of Consolidation, Gaya, under Section 35 of the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, Patna High Court CWJC No.10007 of 2008 (3) dt.05-04-2013 2/2 1956, is under challenge. During the pendency of the present writ petition for adjudicating such dispute an appropriate forum as “Land Tribunal” has been constituted and functioning under the provision of Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009. Accordingly, the Court is of the opinion that this dispute can well be adjudicated by the Tribunal. Accordingly, in view of provision contained in Section 15 of the Act, Registry is directed to transmit the record of the case to the Tribunal forthwith. Praful/- (Rakesh Kumar, J)