IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No. M-3619 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 01.09.2011 Sukhdev Singh ..Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and Anr. ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr. Mansur Ali, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Brar, AAG, Punjab for respondent No. 1. Mr. RVS Chugh, Advocate for respondent No. 2. **** SABINA, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition to enable the petitioner to take up all the pleas available to him during the trial. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. However, Personal appearance of the petitioner before the trial Court shall remain exempted subject to the following conditions:- (i) petitioner shall be represented through counsel; (ii) shall not delay/stall the trial proceedings; (iii) shall not dispute his identity as accused; (iv) shall have no objection if the prosecution evidence is recorded in his absence but in the presnece of his counsel (v) shall appear before the trial Court as and when required by the trial Court; and (vi) any other condition which the learned trial Court may impose. (SABINA) September 01, 2011 JUDGE Poonam (II)