IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12470 of 2009 ARUN KUMAR SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 5.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission on behalf of the petitioner is that a committee was constituted to consider persons like him for regularization in the department of Commercial taxes. The committee made certain recommendation for regularization and his name finds mention in the list of such person recommended. Learned counsel for the State rightly points out that the pleadings in the writ petition are completely inadequate and contains no list of persons recommended, number of vacancies available for regularization and whether the name of the petitioner finds place in the list of such persons allegedly recommended by the committee for regularization. Learned counsel for the State is right in his submission. This Court finds it difficult to pass any positive orders on the writ petition. It is accordingly disposed with the observation that if the committee had been constituted by the Commercial Taxes Department for purposes of regularization in light of any orders of this Court and such committee considered the case of the petitioner also, the name of the petitioner finds place in the list of persons recommended for regularization, the respondents are naturally expected to act in accordance with their own recommendation, subject to availability of vacancies and due compliance of law on 2 the recommendation expeditiously. Let the same be done within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed off. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)