1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPELATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPELATE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6406 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.6406 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.6406 OF 2004 Blue Heaven Estates Pvt. Ltd. Pune & Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents ----- Mr.M.J.Jamdar for Petitioners Mrs.S.S.Bhende, A.G.P. for respondents CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. DATE: 28TH FEBRUARY, 2005. DATE: 28TH FEBRUARY, 2005. DATE: 28TH FEBRUARY, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. . From the prayers in the Petition it appears that the relief sought is in respect of Collector’s Orders dated 12th March, 1956 and Tahsildar’s Order dated 16th March, 1956 and consequential orders. The grievance of the Petitioner is that he had made a representation to Respondent No.3 against those orders which have not been considered and disposed of. 2. For Respondent No.3 to exercise jurisdiction, there must be proceedings before it under the Provisions of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. . The representation definitely is not an appeal as contemplated by Section 247 of the 2 M.L.R.Code. The orders as sought to be reviewed and/or of the year 1956. On these grounds also no interference is called for. Petition rejected. 3. If the copies as sought for in terms of prayer clause (c) are available, then the copies of the same may be given to the Petitioners on payment of usual fees within reasonable time. 4. It is however, made clear that if the Petitioners are entitled for any statutory remedy under provisions of Land Revenue Code, it will be open to them to take such remedies. With the above, the petition stands disposed of. (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (S.P. KUKDAY,J.) (S.P. KUKDAY,J.) (S.P. KUKDAY,J.)