IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 22301 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 19.9.2011 Binder @ Matto .. Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. K. S. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K. S. Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. ... Rajesh Bindal J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that co-accused in the FIR, who was arrested from the spot, has been acquitted after trial by the learned court below vide judgment dated 14.12.2006. The petitioner was not arrested from the spot. She is in custody since 28.1.2011. As the evidence against the petitioner is same as was there in the case of the co- accused, who was arrested from the spot, there is no chance of conviction of the petitioner. She be released on bail pending trial. The aforesaid facts are not disputed by learned counsel for the State. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the contentions raised, in my opinion, the petitioner deserves concession of bail pending trial. She is directed to be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Jalandhar. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 19.9.2011 mk