IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC NO.2914 OF 2008 CHANDULA KUMARI, WIFE OF SHRI SADANAND MANDAL, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE USMANPUR, POLICE STATION KHARIK, DISTRICT BHAGHALPUR VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BHAGALPUR 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MAUGACHHIA, BHAGALPUR 4. THE Block Development Officer, KHARIK, BHAGALPUR 5. THE Child Development Project Officer, KHARIK, BHAGALPUR 6. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT USMANPUR, KHARIK BLOCK, DISTRICT BHAGALPUR 7. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT USMANPUR, KHARIK BLOCK, DISTRICT BHAGALPUR 8. SHASHIKALA KUMARI, WIFE OF SHAMBHU KUMAR MANDAL, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE USMANPUR, POLICE STATION KHARIK, DISTRICT BHAGALPUR ********* 2 06/04/2011 The petitioner has challenged the appointment of respondent no. 8, Shashikala Kumari to the post of Aanganbari Sevika of Ward No. 1 under Usmanpur Gram Panchayat, Block Kharik, District Bhagalpur. The respondent no. 8 was earlier appointed as Aanganbari Sevika. The petitioner challenged her appointment on the ground that respondent no. 8 had lower marks to the petitioner. The appointment of respondent no. 8 was set aside by the Sub Divisional Officer and thereafter by the District Magistrate, who ordered that a fresh Aam Sabha should be held for the purposes of selecting a candidate for the post of Aanganbari Sevika. Accordingly, a fresh selection was held and again the respondent no. 8 was appointed by 2 virtue of the fact that she had a graduate degree for which she was allotted extra 5 marks. Admittedly, the petitioner had higher marks in the matriculation and intermediate examinations. The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that respondent no. 8 was allowed to produce the graduation certificate for the purpose of being consider for appointment as Aanganbari Sevika. According to the petitioner, if in fact respondent no. 8 had a proper graduation certificate, she would have produced the said certificate at the time of the first appointment. The petitioner suspects that the graduation certificate is not genuine. After considering the aforesaid submissions, this Court comes to the conclusion that the petitioner is aggrieved by the appointment of respondent no. 8, the proper forum for the petitioner to make a complaint, would be the District Magistrate, Bhagalpur. This writ application is not maintainable at this stage. The petitioner may approach the proper forum, if so advised. This writ application is accordingly disposed. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)