IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14710 of 2009 ITA YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- Cr.Misc. No.21589 of 2009 AMIT KUMAR SINHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 31.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners are in custody in a Police case under Sections 379,411 of the Penal Code for approximately over last six months. The allegations are that on the confession of the petitioner Ita Yadav, motorcycle in question was recovered from the co-accused Amit Kumar Sinha. Learned counsel for the State points out that both of them have 11 cases against them with similar allegations. The allegations are not of snatching but of theft of parked motorcycle. Considering the period of custody and their antecedents, the petitioners abovenamed are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 50,000/-(Rupees fifty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Bettiah, West Champaran in Shikarpur P.S. Case No. 46 of 2009. Both the sureties must be their mother and father 2 respectively, whose photograph and proof of residence shall be appended to the bail bonds. The petitioners shall be liable to be physically present on each date in the trial. The court below shall retain the liberty to exempt them from such appearance on any particular date, if an application is filed, in its own wisdom. In the event that the petitioners breach either of the two conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to deal with them appropriately notwithstanding the present order so that the progress of the trial is not delayed in any manner. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)