IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22445 of 2011 Ashok Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ------ 02/ 26.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named accused in Chewara P.S. Case no. 5/2011 registered under section 376F of the IPC. It is stated that he was seen by the informant coming out from her house and when the informant immediately went inside her house, she found her daughter aged about 6 years in injured condition and she noticed that blood was oozing out from private part of her daughter. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is resident of district East Champaran and admittedly, he is driver. It is further contended by him that, as a matter of fact, petitioner had gone to Sheikhpura to bring stone chips but altercation took place between the husband of the informant and the petitioner resulting false implication of the petitioner in the present crime. Although learned counsel for the petitioner tried his best to convince me about innocence of the petitioner but I am not at all convinced with his submission because according to the prosecution case just after the alleged occurrence, petitioner was caught by the villagers. Hence, prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with above stated Chewara P.S. Case no. 5/2011 stands rejected. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)