1 WP No.4778/10 mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4778 of 2010 Shrikrishna Vitthal Jadhav & ors. ... Petitioners. versus Sachin Vijay Lale & ors. ... Respondents ... Mr. S.V.Sadavarte for the petitioners Mr.Ashok B. Tajane for the respondents CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 18th November 2010 P.C. 1. The signature in question is disputed. The plaintiffs therefore prayed for permission for inspection of the documents with the help of his own expert so as to obtain the report of his expert. The permission was granted. That order is impugned in the present petition. In my view, since the signature is disputed, plaintiff should be allowed to examine his own expert to prove the signature. Inspection of the documents in the manner applied is necessary for the expert to give his opinion. Hence, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the trial court did not commit any error in allowing the inspection of the documents in the manner requested by the plaintiff. Needless to say that the expert evidence would be subject to the provisions of the Evidence Act. With this observation, writ petition is rejected summarily. (D.G.KARNIK, J)