IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH MAY 2008 / 7TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 15887 of 2008(N) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: ------------ 1. MUSTHAFA, S/O.KUNHAHAMMED MOLLA, CHENNANKUZHI HOUSE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. CHANDRAN, S/O.CHEETHA KUZHI KUNHADI, ALIPARAMBA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. C.P.SIVASANKARAN, S/O.CHOOLIPPURATH KOTHA, ALIPARAMBA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE CHIEF TOWN PLANNER, OFFICE OF THE CHIEF TOWN PLANNER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT TOWN PLANNER, MALAPPURAM. 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM. 4. THE SECRETARY, ALIPPARAMBA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 5. THE MANAGER, AMLP SCHOOL, EDAICKAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 6. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ALIPARAMBA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT.K.R.DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W.P.(C) No. 15887 of 2008-N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dated this the 28th day of May, 2008 J U D G M E N T Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the fifth respondent had applied for a permit for the construction of a school building. According to the petitioners, a portion of the construction proposed to be undertaken in a pathway which leads to the public road. It is further submitted that the above application for permit has been forwarded by the Panchayat to the first respondent, before whom it is pending. 2. Highlighting the objections that the petitioners have, they have filed Ext.P4 objection before the first respondent. On the ground that the first respondent is ignoring the objections so raised and is proceeding to consider the application made by the fifth respondent this writ petition is filed. 3. The prayer now made by the petitioners before me is to direct the first respondent to consider their objections also when the claim of the fifth respondent for building permit is considered. 4. In view of the objections raised by the petitioners, it is only reasonable that the first respondent is directed to consider W.P.(C).No.15887/2008-N -: 2 :- their grievances on the application now made by the fifth respondent while the issue is being considered by him. 5. It is therefore directed that the first respondent shall take note of Ext.P4 objection filed by the petitioners, while the application for the building permit made by the fifth respondent is considered. Petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment before the first respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge ms