HISH COUSfT CT° CHHATnSSiWH AT BILASI^R W.P. (55 No. 1969 of 2007 Petl'tiwwr Versus Vinsent Miry. son of Shri Samuet Minj, oged obout 45 years, workiry as Assjstant Tedicer, &ep<rtment of Tribal, &overnment Primary Schoot - Pakar-Kudar, R/o. Biursa, Tah. Kunkwi. Distt. Jashpur (C.6.) (Sf. No. 145 of the Impuguned Order P-1) 1. State of Chhattisgarh, ttiroigh the Secre'tary, Oepn-tment of Tribat, Dau Kaiyan Singh Bhowan, Raipur (C.6.) 2. The <4ssistant Canmissioner, Depai^tment of Tribal, Jashpur (c.e.) 3. Btock Education Offieer, Biock Kunkuri, Distt. Jashpur (<:.$.) Pr-esent: Mr. Hcrish idiuntiya, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel l.awyep for- State/respondents. OR&ER ffossed on this 2nd t>oy of April, 2007) I. The question of law involved herein asto whefher the petiti'oner is entitled to regular poy scate w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from the date of completi'on of probation period. 2. Learned counsel appearir^ for the petitioner as well ee fw the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved the present wrif petifion cre the same ^ to that of in W.P. (5) Mo. 4725/2006 (Amar Sai Ram & other-s Vs. State of Oihatt-isgarh A others), which was disposed of vide order doted 1.9.2006. 3. In view of the above-stated submissions mwSe by lewned eounsel for the parties, the wit petition is disposed of in the sane terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- .:•':,: Satish K.Agnihotri , Judge :. , •'^. Subhash