mmW/CU QQ m 1m? (Wu) ‘ .. 111200% WWW mmm 3 S.B. Hon’ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra, J 24. 10.2008 Mr. BP Rao, counsel for Mrs. Smita Ghai; PL for With The consent of lea is heard finally. Learned counsel annear present the petitioner may be the petitioner. the State. fned counsel for the parties, the petition mg for the petitioner submits that for the given an opportunity of tiling a detailed WWW WW§wm $31Tawm Petitioner Smt. Subhashini Shukla. W/o Shri Shashi Kumar Shukla, Agcd about .53 years, Employed aS AssiStant Grade—1L Ofo Execl Jive Engineer, Water Resources Depau tment, Tandula Division, Durg. Resident at : ii23, Irrigation Colony, Mohan Nagar, Durg. ‘ Versus ' Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Thrmgh The Secretaryk Water ReSources Depajtment, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, - Raipt r—491002 (CG) 2. The Engineer-in—Chief, Water Resources Department, Sihawa Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raip1r(CG) 3. The Chief Engineer, (Mahanadi Godavari Kach'llar), Water Resources Department, Raip1.r(CG) 4‘. The Executive Engineer, Water Resources Depa;ment, Tandula Division, Burg (CG) wp.526..? o mm H1200 2) mW (Wu) Mmfaia? Wmm WWW WW $31‘Erqm réprestiiitaiion before the ccmpsmnt authority, ca'm’wél annsaiing for the Stat: has 110 objscfion. Having eonSidered and without expressing all}? opinion on the men‘te of the case, 1'11 the opinion of this Court, ends of justice will be Served if ii‘oertv is granted to the petitioner to make a detailed representation raiSing all her grievances raieed in this petition before the competent anthoiitv of the respondents along with copy of this petition and this onier, within a period of one month from today. On snoh representation being fded, the competent authority of the respondents may decide the aine on its own merits, in accordance with law as early as possib e, preferably within a period of three manths {mm the date of i‘EQEilnL of the 1~€pr€s€ntation With the aforesaid obsei atian, tl1€ p€titi0n is disposed o‘f Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra‘i ‘ Judge ‘n, g”l. x to which learned