IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34124 of 2009 ANJANI KUMAR son of Vimlanand Prasad, resident of Mohalla Purani Bazar, P.S.- Bakhtiarpur, District- Patna Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 27.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The offence alleged is under sections 420/120B/409 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case with the allegation that s sum of Rs. 1,50,000/- was taken as loan from the complainant that the same will be invested in the business to be carried out jointly with the complainant and the profit shall be shared. It is further submitted that the allegation is absolutely false and there is no question of transaction of any taking of money. It is further submitted that the allegations are vague with regard to the nature of business. Learned counsel also contends that the allegation of issuing a cheque of Rs. 23,000/- by the father of the petitioner in favour of one Anil Kumar who was a witness of the above transaction does not stand to a reason. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Barh, in connection with Complaint Case No. 121 ( C) of 2007 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)