1 crwp1880.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1880 OF 2011 Ashish Pritam Sharma & Ors. ...Petitioners. Vs. Mamta Ashish Sharma & Anr. ..Respondents Mr. Vivek Salunke for the Petitioners. Mrs. Pranali Kakade i/by Mr. Subhash Hulyalkar for the Respondent No.1. Mr. D.R. More, APP for the State. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 13TH OCTOBER, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard both the learned Counsel extensively. Respective parties present. The order passed on 1st July, 2011 in Criminal Appeal No. 254 of 2011 of police assistance in favour of wife Smt. Mamta is question by the husband Ashish. During the course of submissions, it is informed, challenging the same order husband Ashish has also filed Appeal being Appeal No. 256 of 2011 before the same Court, which has been stalled due to operation of order in Criminal Appeal No. 254 of 2011, and proceedings before this Court. 2. The parties and the learned Advocates had deliberations, however, they could not reach to a consensus. The wife says, she has started residing in matrimonial home, while the husband Ashish disputes the same and submits entire atmosphere in his family is disturbed. Mr.Salunke submits 2 crwp1880.11.sxw Smt.Mamta is gainfully employed and lost maintenance. In order to resolve the controversy and to ensure that the Criminal Appeal Nos. 254 of 2011 and 256 of 2011 are disposed of, following arrangement needs to be made: (a) The husband Ashish shall pay an amount of Rs. 5000/- per month effective from 1st October 2011 till the disposal of his Appeal No. 256 of 2011. The respondent Mamta shall not insist for police protection by virtue of order dated 1st July, 2011 and shall also desist from entering the premises till disposal of her Appeal No. 254 of 2011. (b) The learned Sessions Judge at Pune, considering the peculiar facts and nature of controversy, shall expeditiously dispose of both the appeals within a period of 6 months (Six months) of receiving communication. (c) The parties to endavour to explore settlement by engaging service of mediator or otherwise. 3. With the above observations, the Criminal Writ Petition No. 1880 of 2011 is disposed of. 4. The direction of payment of Rs. 5000/- per month referred to above is certainly without prejudice to the rights and contention of the petitioner Ashish as this is a interim arrangement made till disposal of the above referred two appeals. ( K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. ) 3 crwp1880.11.sxw