'/ m. HiGH COURT OF GHHATT!SGARHATiBILASPU! W. P^) No. 3107 of 2007 ^ Petjtioner Respondente Vsrsus 2. 3. Puniram Yaday. s/o Bhukhau.ased about 60 years, r/o Kansa Ghowk, Tikrapara, BHaspyr (C.G.) Municjpaf Corppratfon - Through— Th® Si'unidpai Commisstoner, Muriicipai Corporation, Bilaspur C.G...;' ••'•' TheColiector. BiiaspurC.G. Jhe Heajtft Officer; Munjcjpai CorpsrafoB,Bi!aspur,C.G. WRiT PETmON UNDERABifKSLE 2^ GF THE CONSTmiTiuNOhiNuiA S: Hon'bte JusStee Satish K. Agnjhotri Shrii A. V. Shridhar, Advocate forthe petifoher. ShrjA.S.Kachwaha.AdvocatefortherespORdentNo.1. Shri gatish Gupts£E3eputyGovt. Advocafe forthe respondents No. 2 snd 3. ORDER (Passed on this 14"' day ofJune, 2007) 1. The petitioner has impugned ths noticsdated 24.3.2007 (Annexure P/1) whersin the petitioRer has been asked So shlft hfe dsiry to &e wea.namely 'Gokuldahasn', which has bsen deveteped by ths A'S'unjcJpai CorporaSon. Biiaspyr for dajries. Ths noScs indicates that ; Huasr ths provisions of the Munfeipsl Soiid Wastes (Management and HandSjng Ruies) 2QQQ such acSJYjSes cannot be permitted in the ' resjdentia! areas. Thus. tbe separate area at Gokuidham has been ; ds'i?$!eige(!ftir{hesaid.pUi¥io3e. . 2. Shri i^ehtraha. ieamed ceunse! appearing forthe respondent No. 1 submiN:that the petitioner has not mads any appiication fbr alfotment of the sits jnGokuJdham. The moment an application is ir>ade,the Gorporation shai! conskierthe sameand aiiotthesite. r :;<••<• 3. In view of that. there is no merit in this petiteon. The petitioner is at liberty to make a proper appiicstton to the munjcipa! authoritiss for a!!otment of the sits at Gokutdham. The Municipal Corporation shal! consider and pass appropriste ordsr, accordingjy. 4. In view of ths forsgoing, ths petition stends dispossd of. No order as to coste. ThaRur Sd/- ^ •; SatishBEAgnitioft-i Judge