IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 26037 of 2007 Between: 1 Sri Vidyanilayam High School (VI to X Class), Vidyanagar, H/o. Gudigunta, Denduluru Mandal, West Godavari District. 2 Sri Sansakrit Vidyanilyam Primary School (I to V Class), Vidyanagar, Mundur Post, Eluru Mandal, West Godavari District. 3 Sri Medikonda Nagabhushanam Memorial Oreintal High School, (1 to X Class), Garlamadugu, Pedavegi Mandal, West Godavari District. (all the Petitioners Rep. by its Correspondent & Secretary M. Satyanarayana). ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner & Director of School Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 The District Educational Officer, West Godavari District, Eluru. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more fully in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not paying the maintenance grant from the year 2003-2004, 2004-2005, 2005-2006 and 2006-2007 as per the G.O.Ms.No. 320 Education dated 16-09-1994 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstituional and issue consequential direction to the respondents to pay the arrears of the maintenance grant due from the 2003-2004, 2004-2005, 2005-2006 and 2006-2007 and continue to pay the same in future. Counsel for the Petitioners: SMT.K.SESHARAJYAM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following ORDER: HON’BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI Writ Petition No.26037 of 2007 ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that Sri M.Satyanarayana, who was the Secretary and Correspondent of the petitioners-Educational Institutions at the time of filing of the writ petition died and thereafter, the petitioners are contemplating to pursue other remedies available under law for redressal of their grievances. Accordingly, granting liberty to the petitioners to work out the appropriate remedies as available under law, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _____________ G.Rohini, J Dt.15.06.2009 VGB