1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4852 OF 2010 (National Women's Welfare Society vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. JULY 14, 2011. Heard Shri Joharapurkar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Fulzele, learned AGP for the respondents finally. Perused the earlier order of this Court dated 17.03.2010 in Writ Petition No. 5297 of 2009. Though in terms of said order, the lacunae about required deposit can be said to have cured, it is not clear whether reason for negative recommendations by District Level Committee and State Level Committee has also been wiped out. According to Shri Joharapurkar, learned counsel, said negative recommendations are no longer valid after the orders of this Court dated 17.03.2010. We have perused the reply filed in that petition by present respondents and therein also said negative recommendations were put forth as one of the grounds for rejection. Those negative recommendations are again pressed into service even in present reply filed 2 on 30.06.2011. The circumstances which permitted District Level Committee and State Level Committee to make negative recommendations are not before this Court. The learned AGP is seeking time to produce necessary records in this respect. Shri Joharapurkar, learned counsel points out that the petitioner before this Court, for the first time, cannot meet the findings, if any, recorded in such records. In this view of the matter, we find it appropriate to direct the respondent – State Government to give an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner after permitting him to go through the records. Only for that purpose and without recording any finding about the recommendations made by District Level Committee or State Level Committee, we set aside the order dated 8th June 2010. The petitioner is directed to appear before Respondent No. 1 on 22nd August 2011. On that date or on some other day, as per its convenience, Respondent No. 1 shall permit the petitioner to inspect the records and then after hearing him proceed to take appropriate decision as early as possible by 30th October 2011. With these directions and observations, writ petition is partly allowed and disposed of. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.