IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 3522 of 2010 Date of Decision: 01.09.2010 Tikka Singh and another .... Petitioners Versus Devi Dayala and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. S.S. Bains, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Sanjay Tangri, Advocate for the respondents ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present petition is filed challenging order dated 15.4.2010 passed by Addl. District Judge, Chandigarh thereby restraining the defendants No. 1 and 2 not to alienate the shares of Raja Ram from the suit land during the pendency of the present suit. Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly stated that if trial Court is directed to expedite the hearing of the suit and to decide the suit on merit without being influenced by the observations made in the impugned judgment then petitioners would be more happy and petition be dismissed as not pressed. Petition is dismissed as not pressed. However, learned trial Court is directed to decide the suit itself without any undue delay preferably within 18 months from today. Trial Court is requested not to grant any unnecessary adjournment to either of the party. However, it is made clear that learned trial Court shall not influence by any observation made in the impugned order. (ALOK SINGH) 01.09.2010 JUDGE reena