A-11 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 128/2009 RAVI SHANKARAGGARWAL ...Appellant ^ Through Mr Anil K.Kher,SrAdv. with Mr V.S.Pandey and Mr S.S. Pandit, Advs. 4 versus SUJATAAGGARWAL •..Respondent Through Mr Manu Nayar, Ms Aradhna Mittal and Mr S.L.Srivastava, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SEN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH ORDER % 15.02.2010 Mr Anil Kher, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Appellant, states that the Report of the Registrar General incorrectly fastened on the Appellant the liability to pay Court Fee. In this case, the Plaintiff/Respondent/wife has filed actions for maintenance on behalf of her daughter as well as herself as also a Suit for partition. Afteran enquiry had been conducted by the Registrar General of this Court, by Order dated 23.7.2001 a finding had been returned in other proceedings between the parties to the effect that the Respondent/wife was entitled to pursue htigation in Forma-Pauper. In the impugned Order, the Learned Single Judge has extracted a portion of FAO(OS)128/2009 1 of2 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified >- those Orders. The LearnedSingleJudge has, in our view, not directedthe Appellantto pay the Court Fee. All that has been said is that the Petitionsshall continueleaving the questionof the indigencyof the Respondentopen to be decidedat the final stage of the Suit. For removal of all doubts the Appellant shall not pay Court Fee, at this stage of the proceedings. This questionwill be decided at the final stage of each of the proceedings. Final opportunityto file Written Statement within thirty days is granted to the Appellant. Appeal is disposed of in these terms. February 15, 2010 nt h VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J. MANMOHAN SINGH; J. FAO(OS)128/2009 ^