IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr Misc No 15942 of 2009 1 Rameshwar Sao, son of late Gopal Sao 2 Shanti Devi, wife of Rameshwar Sao 3 Sunita Devi, wife of Vijay Sao, residents of Village – Karmo, P S – Sikandara, District – Jamui - Petitioners Versus State of Bihar - Opposite Party ----------- 3 17.08.2009 Petitioners No 1 and 2 are father-in-law and mother-in- law of the deceased. Petitioner No 3 is the Gotni. They apprehend arrest in Rajauli Police Station Case No 170 of 2008 dated 22.12.2008 arising out of Complaint Case No 805 of 2008 as filed before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada. In the complaint, it is alleged by the complainant that his daughter was married to one Sanjay Sao about 8 to 9 years back. They had a son and a daughter. They were demanding money after the marriage. About a year back, the complainant came to know that Sanjay Kumar had contracted another marriage. Complainant received call on 19.07.2008 and enquiries revealed that her daughter had been killed. On behalf of petitioners, it is submitted that in fact the daughter had died more than 2 years back. Nothing in support of this assertion has been brought on record. Apart from stating that she had died because of some medical condition, nothing in support thereof has been brought on record. In the facts and circumstances aforesaid, I am not inclined to entertain this application in respect of petitioners No 1 and 2. Prayer for anticipatory bail on their behalf is rejected. So far as petitioner No 3 is concerned, on her 2 surrendering before the Court below within four weeks from today, she shall be released on bail on her furnishing bonds of Rs 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in Rajauli Police Station Case No 170 of 2008 subject to all conditions as laid down in Section 438 (2) of Criminal Procedure Code. M.E.H./ (Navaniti Prasad Singh)