28. * + # % 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. M .C. No.1212/2009. Mohd. Jahid & Ors. Through Versus State Through CORAM: Petitioners Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate along with petitioners no.l and 7 in person. Respondent Mr. O.P. Saxena, Advocate along with lnspr. Vijender Singh, P.S. Preet Vihar ORDER 24.04.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI 4. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment ? 5. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 6. Whether the Judgment should be reported in the Digest? G.S. 5/STAN/, }. (ORAL): Cri.M.C.No.1212/2009. 5. This is a petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.235/2008 registered under Sections 498- A/406/34 of the IPC at Police Station Preet Vihar, Delhi. 6. Notice. Mr. O.P. Saxena, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the State. ___________ " ___________ _ Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified 7. Petitioner no.7-complainant is present in ·Court and is identified by the 1.0, who is also present in the Court. In support of her identity, petitioner no. 7 has filed a photocopy of her Voters Identity Card. Petitioner no.7 submits that she has arrived at an amicable settlement with petitioners no.l- 6 and pursuant to the settlement she has received a sum of Rs.l.5 lakhs. Petitioner no. 7 further submits that she does not wish to press the FIR and the proceedings emanating therefrom. 8. In this case, marriage between petitioner no.1 and petitioner no.7 was solemnised on 14.10.2001 as per Muslim Rites and Ceremonies. On 18.04.2006 petitioner no.7 left her matrimonial house. An FIR was registered under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC at Police Station Preet Vihar on 17.05.2008. With the intervention of friends and relations, parties have resolved all their disputes amicably and divorce has been granted to petitioner no.1 and petitioner no.7 on 07.08.2008 on which date a sum of Rs. 1.5 lakhs has been paid to petitioner no. 7. Cri.M.C.No.l2l2!2009 2/3 3 9. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Having regard to the statement made by petitioner no. 7 that she does not wish to press the FIR and the proceedings emanating therefrom and in view of the fact that petitioner no.7 has arrived at an amicable settlement with petitioners no.l-6; and petitioner no.l and petitioner no. 7 have also obtained a divorce on 07.08.2008, no useful purpose will be achieved by keeping the FIR and the proceedings emanating therefrom alive. Consequently, petition is allowed. FIR No.235/2008 registered under Sections 498- A/406/34 of the JPC at Police Station Preet Vihar, Delhi, and all the proceedings emanating therefrom, are quashed. 10. Petition stands disposed of. __ G.S. SISTANI, J. April 24, 2009 'msr' Cri.M.C.No.l212/2009 3/3