1 S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.2610/2006 Date : 14.07.2006 HON'BLE MR.SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. R.S. Gill for the applicant. Mr. Vishnu Kachhawaha, Public Prosecutor. Mr. B.N. Sharma for complainant. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the complainant and carefully gone through the case diary and the impugned order. The contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that allegation against the applicant is that she gave Cartridge to co-accused by which fire was made. He submits that the applicant has already been arrested and no investigation is to be made from her. He also submits that no useful purpose shall be served by keeping the lady in the jail during the trial. 2 On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the applicant has opposed the bail application. I have considered the submissions made before me and carefully gone through the material available on record. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the present case, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that the applicant Sant Kour wife of Late Shri Jeet Singh shall be released on bail in FIR No.184/2006 P.S. Raisinghnagar provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J. 3