CWP(T) No.16055/2008 19.07.2010 Present: Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Dy. A.G. for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Lokender Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.4 Having considered the rival contentions at the bar, no case for interference is made out. The private respondent was selected and appointed in accordance with the Policy guidelines. However considering the fact that petitioner, a widow is middle pass and is residing in close proximity to the Primary School, the respondents-State, as has been assured to the Court, shall consider the petitioner’s case for appointment on sympathetic consideration as and when any fresh vacancy in close vicinity of her residence arises for consideration. 2. With these observations, the petition stands disposed of. ( Sanjay Karol ), Judge. July 19, 2010 (rana)