1 WP 114.1992 - [ J ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 114 OF 1992 Shree Vrudheshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., Adinathnagar, Tq. Pathardi, Dist. Ahmednagar Through its Managing Director. .... PETITIONER V E R S U S Ramfalsing Dipsing Chauhan Age : 58 Yrs., Occ. Nil, R/o : Pravaranagar, Near S.T. Stand, Tq. Shrirampur, Dist. : Ahmednagar. .... RESPONDENT -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. V.D.Hon,Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Ulhas S.Sawji, Advocate holding for Mr. T.K.Prabhakaran, Advocate for respondent -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE OF JUDGMENT : 30/06/2011 ORAL JUDGMENT : 1. Heard. 2 WP 114.1992 - [ J ] 2. The present respondent had filed Complaint (ULP ) No. 41 of 1987 claiming that the present petitioner is engaged in unfair labour practice by terminating his services illegally. The Judge, Labour Court, Ahmednagar allowed the complaint, directed the present petitioner to reinstate the respondent w.e.f. 24/11/1986 to 19/2/1989 in continuous service with full back wages till the age of the superannuation. The present petitioner assailed the said Judgment before the Member, Industrial Court, Ahmednagar along with an application for stay of the Judgment passed by the Labour Court. The Member, Industrial Court rejected the application for stay filed U/s 30 ( 2 ) of the M.R.T.U. and P.U.L.P. Act. The said Judgment is assailed in the present Writ Petition. 3. This Court on 22/1/1992 has admitted the Writ Petition and granted ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause ‘ C ’ on condition that the petitioner deposits the entire back wages and that 50 % of the amount be kept in fixed deposit. It seems the present respondent has withdrawn 50 % of the amount. 4. The learned counsel for the respective parties state that the said Revision is still pending though there was no stay to the further proceedings in the Revision. 3 WP 114.1992 - [ J ] 5. The petitioner has deposited the total back wages and the present respondent has withdrawn 50 % of the back wages. There is no point in deciding the petition on merits. Keeping the position as it is i.e. 50 % amount invested in fixed deposit, I deem it appropriate to direct the Member, Industrial Court, Ahmednagar to decide the Revision No. 11 of 1991 expeditiously. 6. In the result, Rule is made absolute in terms of the interim orders passed on 22/1/1992. The member, Industrial Court, Ahmednagar shall decide the Revision No. 11 of 1991 within the period of six ( 6 ) months from today. No costs. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J. ] KNP/WP 114.1992 - [ J ]