IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MA No.299 of 2010 PANKAJ KUMAR, son of Late Ram Autar Singh, resident of Village- Khetalpura, P.S. –Sare, District Nalanda …….. Appellant Versus NEETU DEVI, wife of Pankaj Kumar, resident of Village- Khetalpura, P.S. Sare,District-Nalanda, at present residing at Village-Mahadeopur, in the house of her father Shambhu Chaudhary, P.S. Amarpur, District-Banka ……………….. Respondent . ----------- 2. 20.04.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the appellant. The court below has awarded a maintenance of Rs. 3000/- and litigation cost of Rs. 4000/- when the respondent had claimed Rs. 5000/- and Rs. 10,000/- respectively. Having perused the impugned order dated 17.3.2010 and that the respondent was required to maintain herself and the minor daughter born from the marriage with the appellant we do not consider the amount awarded as unreasonable calling for interference. The appeal stands dismissed. (Navin Sinha,J.) (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.) Snkumar/-