CWP No. 802 of 2009. 15.7.2011. Present: Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. A.G., for respondents No. 1 to 4. Mr. B.C. Negi, Advocate, for respondent No.5. Undisputedly petitioner Barfi Devi and Nisha Kumari had filed two separate complaints against respondent Archana Devi. The Deputy Commissioner, Hamirpur in terms of order dated 1.8.2008 (Annexure P-4) disposed off the complaint filed by Nisha Kumari which was assigned case No. 21 of 2007. Incidentally very same case number was also assigned to the complaint filed by Barfi Devi. In the impugned order (Annexure P-4), there is no reference to the facts, grounds or issues raised or urged in the complaint filed by Barfi Devi. Aggrieved thereof, Barfi Devi filed an appeal before the Divisional Commissioner taking certain specific grounds. The appeal is Annexure P-5. However, in terms of order dated 27.11.2008 (Annexure P-6) even the Divisional Commissioner, without adverting to the facts, grounds and issues so raised by Barfi Devi, has decided the appeal only on the basis of the decision rendered by the Deputy Commissioner, which was on the facts and grounds taken by Nisha Kumari. 2. Accordingly, Annexure P-6, is quashed with a direction to the Deputy Commissioner to independently decide -2- the petitioner’s complaint by adverting to the facts, grounds and issues specifically urged by her. Parties who are duly represented undertake to appear before the Deputy Commissioner on 23.8.2011. Thereafter, Deputy Commissioner shall take a decision on the complaint filed by Barfi Devi within a period of two months. However, present arrangement shall continue till further orders there upon are passed by the Deputy Commissioner. 4. Petition stands disposed off with the aforesaid observations. Copy dasti. 15th July, 2011 (Sanjay Karol), (jai) Judge