IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1273 of 2009 Md.Qaiyum . Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors . ----------- 2. 30.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by what he alleges is discriminatory consideration of respondent no. 6 for appointment on the post of Jharukas-Jamadar for which under the original advertisement the petitioner was the sole candidate and this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 6608 of 2000 on 07.03.2005 had directed consideration of his case. The allegation is that contrary to the directions of the Court, as an act of favoritism, the respondents without considering the case of the petitioner came out with a fresh advertisement in response to which respondent no. 6 applied for the post of cook but came to be appointed as a Jharukas- Jamadar. The counter affidavit as Annexure-C encloses an order dated 10.9.2005 considering the case of the petitioner in light of the directions of this Court, rejecting his claim. A copy of the same has been marked to him also. Learned counsel for the petitioner finds it 2 difficult to persuade this Court any further in the matter in absence of any challenge to the order dated 10.9.2005 being laid out by the petitioner. If his case has been considered and rejected and he has not challenged the same what may or may not have happened under the fresh advertisement for which he was not an applicant is irrespective. The writ application is dismissed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)