IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31298 of 2011 1. Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Kumar Pandey, son of Hari Narayan Pandey 2. Hari Narayan Pandey, son of late Gopal Pandey, both petitioner no. 1 and 2 are resident of village – Gara, P.S. – Kuchila, District – Kaimur at Bhabhua, presently residing at Teachers Colony, Buxar, P.S. – Buxar (T), District & Town – Buxar. -------- Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar -------Opposite Party ***** 03. 20.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Supplementary affidavit and counter affidavit have been filed in this case. The petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 783/2010, Tr. No. 3842/2010 for offences under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, are named accused in this case with allegation of realizing some sort of cash and kind during negotiation of marriage of petitioner no. 1 with niece of the informant and for some reasons negotiation was broken but the articles taken could not be returned. There is total denial of anything lying with the petitioners and submission of breaking of negotiation at very early stage. Taking into consideration all such aspects, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram, in connection with Complaint Case No. 783/2010, Tr. No. 3842/2010, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly till disposal of the case, in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)