1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1318 OF 2010 Pandurang Shridhar Vadane .. Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents. Mrs.I.M.Koparkar for the petitioner. Mrs.A.S.Pai A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE & A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 7TH MAY, 2010. P.C. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. By this writ petition, the petitioner has impugned the order dated 20.3.2010 passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Pune Division, Pune rejecting the petitioner’s application for parole leave on the ground that there is a threat to the life of the complainant and the witnesses in the case in which he was convicted. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset invited our attention to the third paragraph of the impugned order and submitted that the petitioner’s name is wrongly mentioned as Rehman Phir Mohamad Shaikh, which simply shows non application of mind by the concerned authority while deciding the petitioner’s application for parole leave. Learned A.P.P. on instructions submits that this order may be set aside and the Divisional Commissioner, Pune Division may be directed to S 2 reconsider the petitioner’s prayer for parole leave afresh within timeframe. Hence we pass the following order: The impugned order dated 20.3.2010 is set aside. The Divisional Commissioner, Pune Division, Pune is directed to consider the petitioner’s application for parole leave afresh as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Learned A.P.P. is directed to communicate this order to the Divisional Commissioner, Pune Division, Pune, within a period of two weeks from today. With these observations the petition is disposed of. The parties to act on a copy of this order duly authenticated by the Registry of this court. (A.R.JOSHI,J.) (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)