1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR C. W. P. No.38 of 2009. Brijkishore Govindlal Sarda. Vs. Harikishan Ratanlal Sarda and others. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances,Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri S. N. Bhiwapurkar, Advocate H/F Shri Shyam Dewani, Advocate for petitioner. Shri S. S. Doifode, APP for Respondent State. Coram: A. H. JOSHI AND R.C. CHAVAN, JJ. Dated: 02nd February 2009. 1. This petition is filed for the reliefs which read as under: “(a) issue appropriate writ, order or direction thereby directing the respondent No.5 i.e. State of Maharashtra to transfer the investigation in Crime No.M3/2008 registered with the respondent No.6 i.e. on 11/01/09 vide FIOR (ANNEX.O) MIDC Police Station Nagpur to any specialized agency like Economic Offence Wing-CID, CBI etc. as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper.” [Quoted from page 27 & 28 of the Writ Petition Paper Book] 2 2. It is seen that for the first time, the petitioner has made a grievance about the improper investigation by filing the complaint which is at Page 177 on 15-1-2009. The postal receipt does not indicate the date on which it was dispatched, nor acknowledgment is filed in this Court. 3. In this situation, the petition is premature and is dismissed with liberty as available in law. JUDGE JUDGE Sbm