1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 1 OF 2008 REVIEW PETITION NO. 1 OF 2008 REVIEW PETITION NO. 1 OF 2008 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 944 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO. 944 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO. 944 OF 2004 Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., .. Petitioner. vs. Union of India & Ors. .. Respondents. Dr. V.V. Tulzapurkar, Sr. Adv. i/by Madhusudan R. Gawde for Petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Chawan with D.A. Dubey & Y.R. Mishra for Respondent no.1. Mr. Anil Agarwal i/by A.M. Bhatia for R. No. 2. CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & A.A. SAYED, J. A.A. SAYED, J. A.A. SAYED, J. DATE: 15TH FEBRUARY, 2008. DATE: 15TH FEBRUARY, 2008. DATE: 15TH FEBRUARY, 2008. (IN CHAMBER AT 2.45 P.M.) (IN CHAMBER AT 2.45 P.M.) (IN CHAMBER AT 2.45 P.M.) P.C. . We do not find any case for review as the matter was heard at length and the order was passed in the presence of the learned Advocates for lthe parties who did not make any grievance in the matter. Further, 2 it was taken to Supreme Court by preferring a Special Leave Petition which was also dismissed. Therefore, the review petition stands rejected. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (A.A. Sayed, J.) (A.A. Sayed, J.) (A.A. Sayed, J.)