THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.28718 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioners claim to be the absolute owners and possessors of the subject plots situated at Sriven Enclave, Gajulamamaram Village, Qutubullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. They state that when respondent Nos.3 and 4 tried to interfere with their possession in respect of the said plots, they were constrained to file O.S.No.1200 of 2008 on the file of I Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy and obtained interim order of status quo, which is existing as on today. That in spite of the status quo orders, as respondent Nos.3 and 4 are trying to interfere with their possession, the petitioners claim to have approached respondent Nos.1 and 2 on several occasions seeking police aid for implementation of the said status quo orders, in vain. Hence, the present writ petition. This Court, while issuing notice before admission, on 06.01.2010 directed the second respondent to consider the complaint made by the petitioners, dated 14.12.2009, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In response to the notice issued, the fourth respondent filed counter denying the allegations made by the petitioners. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home produced written instructions of the second respondent, wherein it is stated that pursuant to the interim orders of this Court, dated 06.01.2010, a case in Crime No.80 of 2010 under Section 447 and 427 IPC has been registered based on the complaint of the petitioners, dated 14.12.2009, and during the course of investigation one witness was examined at length and the investigation is pending for want of examining some more witnesses and collecting relevant documents. It is also stated that after completion of investigation, appropriate report/charge sheet, as the case may be, would be submitted before the Court concerned at the earliest. In view of the stand taken by the second respondent in the written instructions, the learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that no further orders are necessary in the writ petition. Accordingly, placing on record the written instructions of the second respondent, the writ petition is closed. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date:19.07.2010 VGB