COCP No.2047 of 2009(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2047 of 2009(O&M) Date of decision: 23.12.2009 Inder Singh ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.Vijayendra Kumar and others ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Jasbir Mor, Advocate for Mr. Surinder Singh Duhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohnish Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate for the respondents. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) CM No.30096-CII of 2009 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Separate replies filed on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3 are taken on record. COCP No.2047 of 2009 As per the averments made in this petition vide judgment dated 19.8.2009 passed in CWP No.8125 of 2008, the respondents were to complete the service book of the petitioner and release the consequential benefits, if admissible to him, in accordance with law. In response to the show cause notice issued by this Court, separate replies have been filed on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3. In the affidavit of respondent No.2, it has been submitted as under: “That in compliance of the order dated 19.8.2009, annexure P/1, necessary steps were taken by the respondent Nigam to complete the service book of the petitioner and after the completion of service book of the petitioner, the pay of the petitioner was fixed afresh in COCP No.2047 of 2009(O&M) 2 the revised pay scale and thereafter, the arrears of the difference of pay was calculated by the respondent office w.e.f. 1.1.2006 to 30.11.2009 and an amount of Rs.98023/- was paid to the petitioner vide cheque dated 15.12.2009 which was duly accepted by the petitioner. A true fair typed copies of the details/calculation of the arrears of the pay of the petitioner are attached herewith as annexures R-2/1 and R-2/2 respectively. Thus, the order dated 19.87.2009, annexure P/1 passed by the Hon'ble High Court is duly complied with by the answering respondent in its true letter and spirit. In view of the aforesaid reply filed, I am not inclined to proceed further in this petition. Rule discharged. However, if there is any miscalculation of the amount released to the petitioner, he shall be at liberty to submit a representation to the respondents in this regard. If any such representation is filed within one month from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law within two months thereafter. Needless to say that if any other amount is found due, the same shall be released to the petitioner within one month thereafter. December 23, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE