IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.39572 of 2009 BIJAY KUMAR, S/o Basudeo Prasad, R/o Mohalla – Ramjay Krishna Road, Gurhatta, P.S. Khajekalan, Distt. – Patna ….. ………………………………………………………..Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ………………….... Opposite Party. ----------- For the Petitioner:- Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur and Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha No.1, Advocates. For the State:- Mr. R.P.S. Singh, A.P.P. ---------- 3. 11.12.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 420, 489(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner’s name surfaced when co-accused Vikash Kumar was apprehended by the police along with fake 24 currency notes of Rs. 50/- denomination and he allegedly disclosed that these currency notes were given to him by the petitioner, who is owner of a medicine shop. It is further submitted that even as per the prosecution case, the petitioner had given those fakes notes to aforesaid Vikash Kumar 7-8 days earlier, but no incriminating article has been recovered from possession of the petitioner or his house. It is submitted that apart from the aforesaid fact that co-accused, Vikash Kumar had named this petitioner, there - 2 - is no direct or indirect allegation against the petitioner, who is stated to be in custody since 29.09.2009. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the petitioner, namely, Bijay Kumar to be released on bail on his furnishing bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, Patna in connection with Alamganj P.S. Case No. 215 of 2009, subject to the condition that one of the bailors must be either the family member or close relative of the petitioner, who shall swear an affidavit before the concerned court giving complete genealogy showing his relationship with the petitioner. It is also made clear that if the petitioner, after his release in this case, again involves himself in a criminal case of similar nature, it would be open for the concerned court to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds of the petitioner. dk ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J. )