IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.14265 of 2011 Date of Decision.08.08.2011 National Indo German Organic Product, 604 AB/16, Opposite Bus Stand, Hansi through its Proprietor Mr. Rahul Khurana .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Dinesh Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will be satisfied if the reply (Annexure P-16, which has been issued on behalf of the petitioner, is considered by the addressee within a particular time. 2. The reply given shall be decided by respondent No.2 if the same is presented again along with copy of this order within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the same. 3. The writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission, dispensing with notice to the respondents. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 08, 2011 Pankaj*