IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 10206 of 2001 Between: 1 Marri Anjaneyulu S/o. Venkanna K.D.Peta Village, Golugonda Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 2 Marri Venkataramana S/o. Appalanaidu Koppugunta Village, Koyyuru Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 3 Smt. Poluja Gangayamma W/o. Nagaraju Koppugunta Village, Koyyuru Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 4 Poluparthi Kalyanam S/o. Veeranna K.D. Peta Village, Golugonda Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 5 Lalam Narayana S/o. Matayya K.D.Peta Village, Golugonda Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 6 Sabbavarapu Ramulu S/o. Musalayya K.D.Peta Village, Golugonda Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 7 Kusireddy Sriramamurthy S/o.Satyam K.D.Peta Village, Golugonda Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 8 Reddy Veeranna, since died, Rep. by Reddy Ramana R/o.Koppukonda Village, Koyyuru Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Agent to Government and District Collector, Visakhapatnam. 2 The Agency Divisional Officer and the Spl.Dy.Collector (Tribal Welfare), Paderu, Visakhapatnam District. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Koyyuru Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 4 The Spl. Dy.Tahsildar (TW), Koyyuru Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order dated 29.12.2000 passed by the 2nd respondent herein in respect of LTR Nos. 977/94, 379/94, 387/94, 388/94, 390/94, 393/94, 395/94 and 396/94 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and without jurisidiction and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.P.RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY W.P.NO. 10206 OF 2001 ORDER On 30-4-2009 when the matter came up for hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Therefore, it was directed to be listed under the caption ‘ for dismissal’. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. The conduct of the petitioners indicates that they are not interested in pursuing this matter. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. _____________________________ Justice B.Seshasayana Reddy 5th June, 2009. KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY W.P.NO. 10206 OF 2001 5th June, 2009.