IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO.4661 of 1996 Between: D.V.Varadha Chari, S/o. Late Narasimha Chari, Hindu, 53 years, Accounts Officer, (Revenue) A.P.S.E.B., Nalgonda. ...PETITIONER AND The A.P.S.E.B., Vidyut Soudha, Kairatabad, Hyderabad, rep.by its Secretary. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, declaring the impugned proceedings of the respondent i.e., The A.P.S.E.B., Vidyut Soudha, Khairtabad, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Secretary (APSEB) by its Memo.No. DP/DM.III/DI/156/95 dated 16/02/1996 as void illegal, innefective and oppose to the petitioner fundamental rights under Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and for a consequential direction directing the respondent herein to implement the orders for promoting the petitioner as Senior Accounts Officer. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.T.L.N.CHARY (Not present) Counsel for the Respondent: SMT.M.VINOBHA DEVI The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO.4661 of 1996 ORDER: This matter had come up on 23.11.2004. On that day, none appeared and there was no representation. Even today, when the matter is again called, none appears and there is no representation. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default/non- prosecution. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) 29th November 2004 RRB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //True Copy// SECTION OFFICER Copy To: 1. The Secretary, A.P.S.E.B., Vidyut Soudha, Kairatabad, Hyderabad. 2. Two CD copies.