1 wp-9886.10 Ash FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9886 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri Rakesh K. Agrawal for the Petitioner. Shri V.R. Dhond i/by Shri C.N. Chavan for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 14TH DECEMBER, 2010 P.C.: . Not on board. Taken on board. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. The challenge in this Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is to that part of the impugned order by which the Court Commissioner has been appointed to inspect the suit premises. 3. Apart from the fact that the order impugned has been acted upon, it is purely an interlocutory order which is capable of being challenged in an appeal which may be 2 wp-9886.10 preferred by the Petitioner against the decree passed in the suit if the same be adverse to the Petitioner. 4. Apart from this, the Petitioner can always raise objection to the report of the Commissioner and the said objection is bound to be considered by the Trial Court in accordance with law. 5. Subject to what is observed above, no case for interference is made out. The Writ Petition is rejected. (A.S.OKA, J)