Cwpy (y? amag wggr I” THE HIGH CUTRT CF LIN HYA ,I‘RAY"ESH AT JABJ-XLPUR garh, Eistrict-Surguja (55.13;) (At present asPrisoner No.379 Central JaiJ, laipur). VERS‘LD HE Si? OHS ENI‘ State of ;,‘.P.,thzough 3ecretary for Jail bepartme Vallabh DhaWan, m-IOIAI. (If. r: x. Superintendent, Central Jain, Rairuur (m.P.) “IRIT FE'I‘lTlL'W UNI'ER ARI'ICIF 225/227 OF NEE C(‘WSI‘ITLTICI‘J (F II'T'JA. nt, 'I 8 .{RIT I‘E’flgltf‘? ?Jtg(é $i (T 1994. PETITICMug : Asgar Ali alias Shankar, I‘N‘ 'JA I I‘N‘ 'JA ILT son 9f Suleman Khan, 1"ost—Ledri Colliery, P.S.i‘¢.anendra- w «Wk HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Writ Pe€ition No. 3310 of 1995 PETiTiONER Asgar AH @ Shankar Versus RESPONDENT State of Madhva Pradesh (Now Chhattisgarh) and othets. SE: Hon’hie ML Justice Saiish K. Agnihotri K ,M ‘ 4‘) Present: Shri A5. Kac‘nhawaha, Gcvt. Advocate for the State. GRDER (Passed on 12th Juiy, 2607) This is an office reference. 2) The petitioner filed an appiication for considering the case of convict Asgar Aii @ Shankar s/o. Suieman Khan, in accordance with iaw for pre- mature reiease. r3) The State in its return dated 26-6-2007 has submitted that the petitioner h’ad aiready been reteased from Jail on 27-4-2000 after having served the N sentence 2O years, five months and 21 days. Thus, nothing survives in the matter. 4) Accordingty, the petition is disposed of. i SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI Judge Sd/« Raju ‘