1ab-appln-1747-10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION No. 1747 of 2010 Sou Priya Jaysing Kedar v. The State of Maharashtra Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr Shekhar A. Ingawale, for the Applicant. Mrs M.H.Mhatre, A.P.P.for the State. CORAM:- A.R. JOSHI, J. DATE :- 9TH JUNE, 2010. P.C.:- 1. Heard rival submissions for some time on this anticipatory bail application preferred by the applicant, apprehending her arrest in C.R.No.41/2010 registered with Pandharpur Taluka Police Station, District Sholapur for the offences under Section 420 read with section 34 of IPC and 4, 5 and 6 of the Money Circulation Act, 1958. 2. Allegations against the applicant and the co-accused are that they were office bearers of one Vayudoot Domestic and International Travel Company floated by Shree Samuh had conspired with proprietor of said domestic travel company and cheated the complainant by accepting an amount of Rs.5,000/- and 2ab-appln-1747-10 not obeying the assurance given as to repayment of double the amount invested by the complainant within a period of three months. It is also alleged that neither the said domestic travel company nor the applicant and the co-accused paid any amount as assured to the complainant and cheated him. One Mr Mohan Patil - Director of the said Company, was arrested and has already been released on bail by the concerned Judicial Magistrate. 3. During the arguments it is submitted that present applicant is only the office bearer and following the instructions of her master and as such during the course of her employment had received various amounts which are reflected in the bank account of the accused - applicant and said amounts were utilized for expenditure on arrangement of religious pilgrimage tours. It is also submitted that such detail accounts of receipts and expenses have been given to the I.O. during the attendance at the concerned police station. Such attendance was directed during the intervening period after filing of the present anticipatory bail application till date. 4. Considering the allegations against the applicant and as to her alleged role in the transactions, it would be in the fitness of the situation to allow the present application with certain conditions to the applicant to co-operate with the investigation and as to the attendance. In the result the following order: ORDER: (a) Anticipatory bail application is allowed. (b) In the event of arrest of the applicant Sau. Priya J Kedar in C.R. No. 41/2010 with Pandharpur Taluka Police Station, District Sholapur, she shall be released on bail on executing a P.R.bond in the sum of Rs. 15,000/-with one surety in the like amount. 3ab-appln-1747-10 © In the event of arrest and on availing the bail, the applicant shall attend concerned police station once in a week on every Monday between 10-00 a.m., to 12.00 noon for the period of two months from availing the bail. (d) The applicant shall co-operate with the investigating agency. (e) Any observations made in this order shall not be construed as any finding or any expression of opinion on the merit of the case at the time of trial. (A.R.JOSHI,J)