1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA, PANAJI-GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 194 OF 2005 WITH MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 41 OF 2006 1. Shri Santan Silveira, major, married, residing at Malwaddo, Navelim, Piedade, Ilhas, Goa. 2. Smt. Estaquia Silveira, major, married residing at Malwaddo, Navelim, Piedade, Ilhas, Goa. .... Appellants Versus 1. Shri Collin Xavier Gonsalves major, service, residing at, Maddant, Piedade, Ilhas, Goa. 2. Smt. Amara C. Gonsalves, major, widow of Chrysanthus Gonsalves residing at Navelim, Piedade, Ilhas-Goa. 3. Smt. Piedade Ramos, widow, residing at H. no. 534, Saude, Bautanvaddo, Chorao, Ilhas, Goa. 4. Smt. Justina Piedade Ramos, alias Justina Piedade Ramos e Fernandes, residing at Bounaulo Vaddo, Penha de Franca, P.O. Betim, Britona, Bardez-Goa. 2 5. Shri. Bosteao Xavier Ramos, alias Sabestiao, landlord, major and his wife 6. Smt. Esperanca Ramos, major, married, housewife of respondent No.7, residing at Saunta Vaddo, P.O. Calangute, Bardez Goa. 7. Smt. Ambelina Gonsalves e Fernandes, major, married, household and her husband, 8. Shri Vincete Fernandes, major, married, service, residing at LIC/112-B-E/6, Arreia Colony, Near Asha Niketam, Bhopal, M.P. 462016. 9. Smt. Helena Gonsalves, major, married housewife, daughter of Respondent No.9, and her husband. 10.Shri Mathew Gonsalves, major, married, service, residing at 231/2, D'Souza Bldg, La Campal Colony, Miramar, Panaji-Goa. 11.Shri Agnelo Gonsalves, married, major, service and his wife 12.Smt. Arcanja Gonsalves, married, major, housewife, residing at Bairro santaarbhat, Piedade, Ilhas Goa. 3 13.Shri Antonio Gonsalves, major, married, service, son of deceased respondent no.9 and his wife. 14.Smt. Maria Caetana Gonsalves major, married, housewife, residing at Bairro Santaarbhat, Piedade, Ilhas, Goa. .... Respondents The above are the registered postal addresses of the parties. None for the Petitioners. Shri J.E. Coelho Pereira, Sr. Advocate with Shri V. Braganza, Advocate for Respondents No. 1 & 2.. CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. DATE: 30th August, 2006 ORAL ORDER Heard learned Senior Counsel for Respondents No. 1 & 2. None appears for the petitioners. The petitioner is also called out but not present. 2. By order dated 16/08/2006, the Advocate for the petitioner was allowed to take discharge from the matter since he had complied with the requirements of provisions of the Advocates Act. It was further 4 observed by this Court that no fresh notice was necessary since the petitioners already were informed about the Advocate's intention to take discharge and, therefore, it was kept open to the petitioners to make alternate arrangement or to take necessary steps to get appropriate representation. However, none appears today and hence the petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. P. V. KAKADE, J. NH