CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.18546 OF 2009 :{ 1 }: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISION: MARCH 11,2011 Kundan Lal and another .....Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: None for the petitioners. Mr. S. S. Patter, DAG, Haryana, for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. (ORAL) This order will dispose of Civil Writ Petition Nos.18546 of 2009 (Kundal Lal and another Vs. State of Haryana and others, 18216 of 2009 (Kirori Mal and others Vs. State of Haryana and others) and 19321 of 2009 (Siri Kishan and others Vs. State of Haryana and others). The petitioners in these writ petitions have prayed for direction to quash notices dated 16.11.90, 20.3.2009 and 14.1.2009 (in Civil Writ Petition Nos.18546, 18216 and 19321 of 2009 CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.18546 OF 2009 :{ 2 }: respectively) and for issuing mandamus to the respondents to remit the excessive amount including penal interest already charged from the petitioners and further for not to charge the interest on non- construction. Prayer also is to remit the amount, which has already been released. In response to notice issued, reply has been filed on behalf of respondent Nos.2 and 3. By way of preliminary objection, it is stated that against the order passed by the Secretary, Market Committee, an appeal is maintainable before the Chief Administrator, Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board, Panchkula under Section 40(1) of the Punjab Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1961. Thereafter even revision is also maintainable before the Government under Section 40(3) of the Act. Accordingly, it is stated that the petitioners have an equal alternative efficacious remedy without justifying the action of the respondents in charging the interest. Since there is an equal efficacious remedy available to the petitioners, they are relegated for their alternative remedy of filing appeal. The writ petitions are accordingly dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to file an appeal against the same, which shall be considered and decided on merits and shall not be dismissed on the ground of delay in filing the same. March 11,2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE