IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 4TH JANUARY 2011 / 14TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 145 of 2011(P) ------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. SHAFEER.E.B., S/O.BAVA, AGED 24 YEARS, ERUTHIYIL HOUSE, KODIKUTHIMALA, ASHOKAPURAM.P.O., ALUVA. 2. ANSHA.P.N., D/O.NAZAR, AGED 22 YEARS, PAMPINEZHATH HOUSE, P.O.PUTHENCHIRA SOUTH, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. DEEPA.K., D/O.K.K.DIVAKARAN, AGED 22 YEARS, KAVUNKAL HOUSE, P.O.PUTHENCHIRA SOUTH, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 4. ASHA ARAVIND, D/O.C.K.ARAVINDAKSHAN, AGED 22 YEARS, PUTHIYEDATH HOUSE, MUPPATHADAM.P.O., ALUVA. 5. SAJEER.A., S/O.ABDUL RASHEED, AGED 26 YEARS, KONDODYMEKKANTH, VADAKKUNNEL.P.O., KARUNAGAPPALLY. 6. RETTY VARGHESE, D/O.VARGHESE, AGED 28 YEARS, PULIKKATHARA HOUSE, NEAR CONVENT JUNCTION, TRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 7. SOUMYA.P.S., D/O.SUKUMARAN, AGED 22 YEARS, PUNNALAKUDY, MUDICKAL.P.O., PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 8. RIYAZ NAZAR, S/O.NAZAR, AGED 23 YEARS, RAZEENA MANZIL, KARUMPUZHA.P.O., KOTTAYAM. 9. ANZILA ASHRAF, D/O.ASHRAF, AGED 23 YEARS, MOHAMMED MANZIL, MRRA 19, MILLENIUM LANE, MANIMALA ROAD, EDAPPALLY-24. 10. ASHWINRAJARAM.H.R., S/O.RAJARAM.K.P., AGED 25 YEARS, USHUS, IST FLOOR, KARIPAI ROAD, NORTH KALAMASSERY. BY ADV. SRI.C.A.CHACKO SRI.N.A.SHAFEEK SRI.M.S.UNNIKRISHNAN (OASIS) WPC NO.145/2011 -2- RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PRIYADARSINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM-686 562. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM-686 562. SRI.T.A.SHAJI, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 145 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 4th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners were MBA students of MES College, Marampally in the academic year 2008-10. When the result of the 3rd Semester examination was declared, petitioners 1 to 9 failed in one paper viz., “Advanced Corporate Finance” and the 10th petitioner failed in two subjects viz., “Global Business Environment” and “Consumer Behavior”. They applied for revaluation as per Exts.P11 to P20 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners as per Exts.P11 to P20 within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. WPC No. 145/11 :2 : Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp