IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8442 OF 1991 DATE OF DECISION: AUGUST 12, 2011 Hans Raj .....Petitioner VERSUS The State of Haryana and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: None for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG, Haryana, for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner, while being Sarpanch of the Village, was removed on the ground of his conviction in a criminal case. The conviction had been assailed by filing Criminal Revision No.385 of 1990. The writ petition was accordingly directed to be listed for hearing after the decision of the said Criminal Revision. The Court had not granted any stay. With the passage of time, the present writ petition is rendered infructuous as the term of the petitioner has already expired long ago. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. August 12, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE