HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 8th April, 2011 1st Bail Application No. 259 of 2011 Order on the bail application of the accused. Jagdish S/o Kanehiya Lal ……. Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …….. Opposite Party In Complaint Case No. 1376 of 2010 U/S 323, 498-A I.P.C. and ¾ D.P. Act, Police Station Ranipur District Haridwar Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. Vivek Shukla, the learned counsel for the applicant and Shri S.S. Adhikari, the learned A.G.A. for the State. A complaint case was instituted alleging demand of dowry on the basis of which the applicant has been arrested. Considering the facts and circumstances that has been brought on record and without expressing anything on the merit of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. Let the applicant be enlarged on bail in Complaint Case No. 1376 of 2010, U/S 323, 498-A I.P.C. and ¾ D.P. Act, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 08.04.2011 Shiv