IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 633 of 1999 Between: Y.V.V.V.Ramana, S/o. Y.Murali Krishna Rao, Rajahmundry, East Godavari Disrtict. ..... PETITIONER and 1 State of Andhra Pradesh , rep. by it's Secretary, Education Department,(Higher Education), Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 Commissioner of Collegiate Education, Government of A.P., Hyderabad. 3 Regional Joint Director of Higher Education, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. 4 SRVBJB Maharani College, rep. by it's Secretary & Correspondent, Peddapuram, East Godavari District. 5 S.K.V.T. College, rep.by it's Secretary & Correspondent, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction especially one in the nature of Mandamus: (i) declare that the petitioner is entitled to count his entire service for the purpose of extension of the Career Advancement Scheme benefits without reference to G.O.Ms.No.41 Education, dt.12.2.1998; ii) declare G.O.Ms.No.41 Education, dt.12.2.1998; as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and set aside the same (iii) compel the respondents to extent the Career Advancement scheme benefits to the petitioner by counting his entire service and grant all consequential benefits without reference to G.O.Ms.No.41 Education, dt.12.2.1998; Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s.Jogayya Sarma, Mr.V.Venkata Rao Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following : ORDER It appears, on noticing that Mr.V.Jogayya Sarma and Mr.V.Venkata Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner had expired. Notice was sent to the petitioner by registered post with acknowledgment due on 20th August, 2007 and the same was served on him on 5.9.2007. In spite of the same, no arrangements have been made by the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed for non-prosecution. Apart from that, the learned Government Pleader also states that in view of Act 26 of 2006, the matter has become infructuous. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. __________ 20-02-2008 rkk ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 State of Andhra Pradesh , rep. by it's Secretary, Education Department,(Higher Education), Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 Commissioner of Collegiate Education, Government of A.P., Hyderabad. 3 Regional Joint Director of Higher Education, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. 4 SRVBJB Maharani College, rep. by it's Secretary & Correspondent, Peddapuram, East Godavari District. 5 S.K.V.T. College, rep.by it's Secretary & Correspondent, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. 2.2CD copies