1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1481/2011 ( Vandan Sugandhe Vs. The State of Maharashtra ) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. MP Kale, Adv. for Applicant/s; Mr. NB Patil, APP for State. *** CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 28 th April, 2011. 1) Heard finally. 2) In Crime No.28/2011 of Parbhani (Rural) police station, the accused/applicant seeks pre-arrest bail for offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 326, 504 and 506 of IPC. 3) The Counsel submits, there is no role to the accused/applicant - Vandan in the affairs of rioting and assaulting the complainant – Kamaji and Amol, brother of the complainant. According to learned Counsel, whatever act has been done allegedly was by one Raju Sugandhe, however, accused/applicant, being from the same group of family members, is falsely implicated. 4) The investigation papers produced by the learned APP illustrate that the complainant Kamaji and the injured had suffered 5 and 1 injuries – of CLW nature respectively. The witnesses have named the accused with specific role of assaulting. In the situation, release of other accused on regular bail by itself would not be a ground to exercise power under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. The application lacks merit, dismissed. 5) Interim protection is extended up to 5th May, 2011. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/