r- f •^"T'^ llJKl^ 'A C^ c^. ^ IN_THEijlGHCOURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.l M.A. (C) ^O6 /200SJ ?... ..-% .-.?=% ' K l:SI@!§"a33R"Bt APPELLANT : Claimant :: t.-CA ^,A^>^^-< ^•••' ^- ^ •:^^^^ Manik Mandal S/o Rangodheb Mandal aged about 28 years R/o 3, No. P.L. Home Mana Camp, Thana and Post Mana Camp Tahsil and District Raiipur (C.G.) V! .*.--" RESPONDENTS NON-CLAIMANTS VERSUS 1. Arvind Kumar Sahu S/o Shankar Lal Sahu R/o Village Dharampura Post Deopuri, Thana Mana Camp, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.) 2. I.C.I.C.I. Lombard, General Insurance Company Limited, Lalganga Shopping Maal, G.E. Road, Raipur (C.G.) ^. Miscellanceous ADpeal undeLSection 173 cfHhe Motor Vehicle Act, 1_994 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BILASi3UR M.A.!C)No.600of200£ v< Manik Mandal S/o Rangodheb Mandal, aged about 28 years R/o 3, \^^, Ft l' LJ. f~. No. P.L. Home iVlana Camp, Thana and Post Mana Camp, Tahsii and District Raipur (CG). * ?'. 'y rs ^.©sponQ^ii'cs 1. Arvind Kumar Sahu S/o Shankar Lal Sahu, R/o Vliiaae Dharsmpura Posi Deopuri, Thana Mana Camp, Tahsii and District Raipur (CG). 2. IC!C! Lombard, Genera! jnsurance Company Umited, Lalganga Shopplng Mali, GE Road, Raipur (CG). APPEAL UNDER SECTiON 173 OF THE MOTOR VEH;CLES ACT, •! 988 JSJriGSe Hon'bie Mr. N.K. Aaarwalijy 'resept : Shri S.C. Verma with Shri A.L. Singrou!, Advocates for the appei'ant. None for the respondents. '^.. on 22"° day of Aprll, Learned counsei for the appeliant is heard on admi.ssion. 'his appeai Is directed against the award dated 31.03.2008, by the Xth AddiSionai Motor Acddent Ciaims Tribuna! Raipur, in ciaim case No. 107720^^|iereby an amount of Rs. 5S73/- has been awarded against fhe simpie injury sustained by the appe!lant. ^'"31?'1 \ /,&»•' hri Verma submits that as oer para 14 of the award, the ippeilani sustained grievous injury. •o. After considering the submissions of counsel for Shi appe!i.ant, perusal o? the records and amount awarded by the Tribunai, l do not Tind any substance in this appeal inasmuch as even as per para 14, the Snjury sustained by the appeliant W3S SllTiDIS iH H81:Ur@. 1n s mr;^ o. in a moior accicient ciaim case, as per yection IOB OT t' -! RQ nf tl ^ Ai^.A M .tS? Motor Vehlcies Act, 1988, what Ss important is th; compensation to be awarded by the Courts/Tribunal should be just and proper compensation in the facts and !f ;<& rio^h circumstance of each case. It is neither a bountv nor charitv. The amount, awarded by the Tribunai Is just, proper snd needs no interfersnce. The appeai fiied by the appsliant 'for enhancement of ths compensation has therefore no merit the ssme is iiable to be and is accordingiy dismissed summariiy. Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge Sahu