•c- sn^y w R-fi+ ^f^ ^V^ sti+iicta ^Jt^-^5'^ •:'' ^^1—"^-~^~^ 3^q' "!<l<M|rt<<, SSTfl^'Ko, Rlrtl+fy ^ N1*1yll *^1<* WI, 200 ai^?T WcK (4<f|f^»l<{8T) S'Wl^ 'fff^f ^T^f SIN6LE BENCH: HONfBLE JUSTICE &HIRENDRA MISHRA W.P, Petitioner Vs Respondents Ac^ocate eiovt 04.04.2008 Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Mr. Ajay Dwivedi, Dy. Heard. The petitioner, who District Ourg, has been remo^ed No.4 under Section 40 of thj also been dismissed by the wds <^i'iilci4li Hw<:il* Tf,Fs4il <P>i^i< i?3ifim an^i 2271 N0.2003/08 Bhil<|am Yadav, 5/0 Jeev Rakhoui, aged aboift 58 years, Occupation-Sarponch of Srcuti Panchayat Chunkatta, Tahsil Pa+an, Disl^ict-Durg (C©) 1. ^tate of Chhatt-isgarh, through ^iecretary, Ctepart-ment of Panchayat <+id Social Welfare, &.K.5. Bhawan, (^aipur, District Raipur (C.6.) 2. t^irector, Panchoyat, ftaipur, District- f^aipur (C.6.) 3. 4clditional Collector, Durg, District t^urg (C6) 4. fub Divisional Officer, Patan, District (]>urg (C6) 5. (fhief Executive Officer, Janapad flanchayat Patan, bistrict bur9 (C6). for the petitioner. . Adv. for +he State. s Sarpanch of Gfwm Panchayat Chunkatta, from the said post by the reqaondent Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam. His appeal has ^otlector, District Durg vide order dated ,g^3^ /y—^_^ r &»-i»XHi?-78 aii^r.^r ft;-f(ch Wl 3?l^r aiiiqi ^ ^eq- ^iqicxi, yixflu'KS, Rrti^y ^Wvii shKI* WI, 200 3ii^?r ^ra^ (1i?f5"Rw) ?^giw ^ift? sn^i •z- 29.2.2008 (Annexure P-6). The| 89/2007-08 preferred by the is pending before the respone the opplication for stcying th< Annexure P-6 has been rejecte() has been fixed for hearing on 3| Learned counsel for -the be disposed of with a direction| to conclude the hearing in th^ period. Learned counsel for the I disposed of with •Hie above dir^cl Accordingly, the instant the respondent No.2-Director,| Petition No.lOl/A-89/2007-0^ preferably within a period of of copy of this order. Consequently, I.A. No.l Cert-ified copy as per rul^s ^nliff^ft'i tff^^if ^fe^" ?f^^R ^sifgHsn^r revision petition bearing number 101/A- betitioner aqainst the order of Coltector )<(ent No.2-Director, Panchayat, however, effect and operation of the order of by the respondent No.2 and the matt'er 313.4.2008. tietitioner submits that this petition may jto respondent No.Z-Director, Ponchcayat revision petition within the stipulated jState hos no objection if +he petition is dirdction. >etition is disposed of with a direction to [Ponchayat, Raipur to decide +he Revision expeditiously in accordance wilh law •tfiree months from the date of production ajso stcinds disposed of. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge