IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 1ST FEBRUARY 2011 / 12TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 3244 of 2011(E) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- JOSEPH KAVALAVAZHIKKAL, AGED 65 YEARS, SON OF MATHEW, CO-ORDINATOR, ST.MARY'S CHURCH, NILESHWAR P.O., KASARAGOD. BY ADV. SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER SRI.ANEESH JOSEPH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KASARAGOD AT KANHANGAD-671 315. 2. FR.ROY NEDUMTHANAM, ST.PETERS ROAMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH, PEROLE, NILESHWAR, KASARAGOD-671 314. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P (C) No.3244 of 2011 -------------------------- Dated this the 1st February, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner claims to be the Co-ordinator of St.Mary's Church, Nileshwar. There is a dispute regarding the grave yard situated in R.S No.119/2 of Nileshwar village, in respect of which rival claims have been raised by the petitioner's church and the 2nd respondent. It would appear that the issue is now pending consideration of the 1st respondent who has also obtained Ext.P3 report from the Tahsildar. In this writ petition, what is sought for by the petitioner is a direction to the 1st respondent to take a decision on the dispute as expeditiously as possible. 2. Pleadings show that the aforesaid dispute is pending consideration of the 1st respondent. Therefore, it is for the 1st respondent to give a quietus to the dispute on an expeditious basis. This the 1st respondent shall do with notice to the parties and expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this W.P (C) No. 3244 of 2011 2 judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE ma /True copy/ P.A to Judge