SB Crlmb No.5964/10. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B.CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.5964/2010. Satish & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order : July 7, 2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri D.G. Chaturvedi for petitioners. Shri Amit Poonia, Public Prosecutor for State. Shri B.M. Sharma for the complainant. ****** Heard learned counsel for petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor for the State, learned counsel for the complainant and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for petitioners is that a false criminal case has been lodged against the petitioners on account of the fact that petitioners Satish and Vinod have filed FIR for murder of their father on 13/11/2009 in which complainant party is accused. As many as six criminal cases have been lodged by the complainant party against the petitioners in four of which, final report has been given by the police. Learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the bail application and submitted that in two cases registered for offence u/Ss.323, 325, 326, 447, 308, 452, 341, 307 and 379 IPC challan has been filed. SB Crlmb No.5964/10. 2 However, looking to the fact that the alleged offence is one, under Section 380 IPC only and that too for stealing masonry stones and that petitioners are in jail since 15/6/2010, I deem it just and proper to enlarge them on bail. In the result, this bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners Satish and Vinod sons of Gordhan shall be released on bail in FIR No.199/2010 P.S. Roopbas, District Bharatpur for offence u/S.380 IPC on each of them furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for their appearance before that court on all dates of hearing until conclusion of the trial. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil