l.fwglf SR'H7^ (L c fe> IN THE HIGH COURT OF JU&ICATURE AT BILASPUR. WRIT PETITION 1S) N0. ^16 /2011 PETITIONERS ^ ^''^y'/v ^7jW ^y ^'^ "'•- ..,.;tf^ <s* '^/ ift'M'^^y^ .{^.x^'d .y -%^. ^ -<<' ^TA^. "^^ i^^ <tts.-^ 1. Kunwar Ram Verma, s/o Shri Tilukram Verma, aged about 50 yrs, Occupation-Service, presently working as Assistant Teacher, 6ovt. Primary School, Dona, Block Pathariya, Dist. Bilaspur (C6) 2. Rajendra Prasad Sahu, s/o Shri Ramadhar Sahu, aged about 50 years, Occupation- Service, presently working as Assistant Teacher, 6ovt. Primary School, Bidvida, Block Pathariya, Dist. Bilaspur (CG) 3. Yogendra Singh Chhattri, s/o Shri Ramnarayan Singh Chhatri, aged about 49 years, Occupation-Service, presently working as Assistant Teacher, •6ovt. Primary School, Kakedi Block Pathariya, bist. Bilaspur 4. Linus Khalkho, s/o Shri Sikra Khalkho, agedabout 50 years, Occupation-Service, presently working as Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Nagpura, Block Pathariya, Dist. Bilaspur (C6) ^ Vs RESPONDENTS ^' ^^- ^. ">1> 5. Sendram Srivas, s/o Shri Lalji Srivas, aged about 50 yrs, Occupation-Service, presently working as Assistant Teacher, 6ovt. Primary School Block Pathariya, Dist. Bilaspur (C6) 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Secretariat, Raipur. 2. The Director/Commissioner, School Education Department, Raipur. 3. The District Education Officer, District Bilaspur (C6) 4. The Block Education Officer, Block Pathariya, District Bilaspur (C6) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INblA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS:- As per the cause title. 2. PARTICUL/tRS OF THE RESPONDENT:- As per the cause title. 3. PARTICULARS OF THE OR&ER A6AINST WHICH THE PETITION 15 MA&E: - The present petition is not directed against any particular order but by virtue of this petition the petitioners are / a HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER WRIT PETITION (S) No. 1610 of2011 Kunwar Ram Verma & Others. RESPONDENTS VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aenihotri. J. Present: Shri Dinesh Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondents. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 25th day ofMarch, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation in the light ofvarious circulars issued by the State Govemment. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side has no objection. 3. No permission of this Court is required to make representation to the respondent authorities. Thus, such direction cannot be issued. However, ifthe petitioner makes a representation to the respondent authorities, the same may be considered aud decided in accordance with law, on its own merits and perspective. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is dismissed. Amit