<2) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHVAT BILASPUR M . gmg‘g‘ aench Ihe Director Tamil Nadu Rajya Parivahan Nigam, (Madurai Division) L.No. 19 Tiruanantpuram Road Post Baner Patai. Tinelveli — 627 003 — (T.N.) i > I i r x i I r Appellant on — Applicant No.4) Versus Res ndents (c/la‘ maint) 1. Ku.Pratima Panda D/o lata Manohar Panda, Aged about 24 year Kedar Panda S/o Late Manohar Panda, Aged about 32 years Occupation - Agricufturist 3. Bharat Panda S/o Late Manoh'ar Panda, Aged about 28 years, A11 r/ o Village Rodopali, P.S. Tarhnar, Tehsil gharghoda, Dist : Raigarh—(C.G.) ”L. Res ondents (Noin Applicant) Raj Kurnar'Thakur y S/o Shlvnarayan Thakur, OccupaitonTDriver; R/o-33 Khuldabad, Allahabad, Dist : A11a1habad-(U.P)‘ . l l l 1 l 5. 'Santosh ‘Kumar S/o R.Chandra. OccupationtVehicle Owner R/o Vardhman Dist: Vardhman(W.B.) 6 " Branch Manager National Insurance C0.Ltd. Mobifl Mahal, G;E.Road, Raipur, Dist'f Raipur—(C.G.) 7. / Algar Swami S/o Velapan Aged about 27 years, R/o 1/49 Purv Ka rasta Gali Chinta'Kar-le Seta Patti Madurai, Dist : Madurai—(T.N.) WV M s , ; ® g‘‘ ‘ i 2 ) ‘ \ MISC. APPEAL U/S 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT. w Xl-HC-78 Division Bench Hon'ble Shri S.R. Nayak, CJ & Hon’bie Shri DR. Deshmuidm. 17-01 -2006 : Shri Amit Shanna. learn ‘u‘ appeal shall stand dismissed Court. Sd/- , CHIEF JUSTICE / Sdl- Deshmukh Judge w counsel for the appellant. Finally,‘two weeks' time granted to file synopsis, failing which the r non-prosecution, withoiut reference to the :4 Dilip Raosaheb ' ' w$UW$@%W@ ; WT W M.A. No. 1366/2005 mawwm WWW1§WW EEWW' 25/11/2013 This case is treated as dismissed in View of peremptory court's order dated 17.01 .2006 (for detaiis note sheet part may kindiy be seen) Counsel be informed accordingiy. ARpwn a