1 wp-278.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 278 OF 2011 Laheri A. Bhanushali. ... Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ... Respondents. Shri R.D.Soni i/b. M/s.Ram & Co. for the petitioner. Ms.M.H.Mhatre, APP for the respondent-State. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 23rd February 2011. P.C. : Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. This petition is for quashing F.I.R. Yesterday, we have dismissed writ petition filed by accused No.3 for similar relief. The present petitioner is accused No.4. 2 wp-278.11 3. The prosecution case is that the petitioner has purchased the disputed land from accused No.3. The allegation amongst others is with regard to the offence under section 34 of I.P.C. The investigation is at the advanced stage and the investigating officer is of the opinion that he would be in a position to submit charge-sheet before the concerned Court in another one week’s time. 4. Taking overall view of the matter, therefore, the petition is dismissed leaving option open to the petitioner to take recourse to appropriate remedy as may be permissible by law. However, the question of quashing F.I.R does not arise. (A.R.JOSHI, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)