C.R No. 5467 of 2009 (O&M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R No. 5467 of 2009 Date of decision : September 22, 2009 Karamjit Singh, ...... Appellant (s) v. Jaspal Singh and others, ...... Respondent(s) *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Ms. Tina Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) This revision petition has been filed against the order dated 24.7.2008 (Annexure P-1) closing the evidence of the petitioner by order. On my asking as to why this Court should interfere after so long, counsel for the petitioner stated that before the trial Court there were chances of compromise and that is why the impugned order was not challenged. A perusal of the grounds of revision itself reveals that a request regarding compromise was made for the first time on 3.10.2008 which is almost two and half months after the impugned order was passed. Thereafter, the compromise talks admittedly broke down on 6.6.2009 and this revision has been filed after about three and half months after the break C.R No. 5467 of 2009 (O&M) ::2:: down of the compromise. In the circumstances, there is no ground to interfere under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Consequently, this revision petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. As the main revision petition has since been dismissed, all the pending civil miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) September 22, 2009. JUDGE `kk'