HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 25th April, 2011 1st Bail Application No. 118 of 2011 Order on the bail application of the accused. Jogendra @ Jogi S/o Sewaram ……. Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …….. Opposite Party In Case Crime No. 69 of 2009 U/S 394, 302, 201, 411/34 I.P.C. Police Station Kotwali Jwalapur District Haridwar Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. Parikshit Saini, the learned counsel for the applicant and Shri B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder for the State. The First Information Report indicates that the applicant alongwith Vishnu and Pankaj were seen at the bus stop when the applicant de-boarded the bus. It has also been alleged that the applicant had made some jewelry on the order given by him. Subsequently, the murder of Mursaleen was committed and the looted articles were recovered from the applicant. Considering the aforesaid coupled with the fact that nine witnesses have already been examined by the trial court who have identified the looted articles, this Court is of the opinion that it is not a fit case where the applicant should be enlarged on bail at this stage. The bail application is rejected. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 25.04.2011 Shiv