IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.19565 of 2011 Date of Decision:19.12.2011 Ashima Yadav .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .. Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. H.N. Khanduja, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anjum Ahmed, Addl. A.G. Haryana. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the impugned order has been withdrawn and the petitioner has been allowed to re-join. However, it is submitted that salary for the months of October and November has not been paid. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. However, respondents are directed to consider the claim of the petitioner with respect to salary for the months of October and November, which is the intervening period, within one month from the date of receipt of this order. Copy of this order be given dasti to the learned State counsel under the signatures of Court Reader. 19.12.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE