IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17215 of 2009 1. SMT.SHAKUNTALA DEVI W/O KRISHNA PRASAD R/O C/O GUPTA PAINTER, MOH PANCHWATI CHOWK, SAHARSA, P.S.SAHARSA, DISTT-SAHARSA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND JUSTICE BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DISTRICT JUDGE, ROHTAS AT SASARAM 3. THE DISTRICT JUDGE, HAJIPUR, DISTT- VAISHALI 4. THE DISTRICT JUDGE MOTIHARI, DISTT-EAST CHAMPARAN 5. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MOTIHARI, EAST CHAMPARAN 6. THE DISTRIT MAGISTRATE, SUPAUL ----------- 02 04.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner claims to have received an interview call to appear on 3.8.2005. On 23.11.2009 she approaches this Court that she is not aware as to what happened after she appeared for the Interview on 3.8.2005/2.12.2006. The writ application appears barred by limitation on grounds of unexplained delay and laches. This Court is not persuaded to start a roving enquiry on a belated grievance. The writ application stands rejected. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)