> PAG&NO..M^......^* ^ IN THE HONOURABLE HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.A.NO. '73^ /2003 APPEAL UNDER SECTION 30 OFWORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACT 1923. APPELLANT <APPLICANT ^" \..^r .-.;^^" l^-' 1 NON PONDENT NON-APPLICANT ^ Heera Lal Yadav, S/o Khedu Ram Yadav, age about 50 years, R/ Q Ward No .99 Kaurinbhatha, Rajnandgaon, Post Tahsil, Distt. Rajnandgaon C.G. VERSUS ^, Director Sunil Kumar, S/ o 5hri Damodar Mundra, Kamal solvent factoiy sQmmi. Post Sommi Tahsil/Distt. Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. CLAIM REQUIRED FOR AWARD BEFORE THE LABOUR COURT PASSED AWARD AWARD CLAIMED IN APPEAL Rs. 4^09, 456.50 TOTAL CLAIM DISMISSED "AS CLAIMED IN LABOUR COURT. "y^ ^vi Ma^y / ^^A(^\tf 2?I^y -^ ^jcb '^t?T OT^ST ^FWF hu 75ET ^TPTRTET, ^t^PTg', [s|<vi|'y^< »V(^ ^i^did»Mic»i""""""'"'"""""""L""""<""""""'"^2003 ^TI^?T TR ' ('iclisq<i?) Division Bench. Hon'ble Shri I.M. Quddusi & Hon'ble Shri N.K. Aaarwal. JJ. 07.10.2010 Noneforthe appellant. Shri Pankaj Agrawal, Advocjate , Listj$being revised. Case No one^is present on behal] appeal. Therefore, we have no oth^ appeal in the absence of any one | Therefore, the appeal prosecution. ^' 'Sd/- '—' jI.M.Quddusi \ ^ ~i Judge j <st»i<ii<?i<flviTTp?^f ^* ft^ <f^^{< ^3fRW 3^3?T for the respondent. is called out. of the appellant to press this |r option except to dismiss the ^or the appellant. s dismissed for want of Sd/- N. K.Agarwal Judge ^} ^ltrfte ^^^^y, ^^^W -FS/147—2/2010—1,00,000. ^ • •€.