BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the First day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.14209 of 2011 DHARMARAJ ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PANAKUDI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. ( CRIME NO.431 OF 2011 ) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. J.JOHN JAYAKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.S.DURAI PANDIAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for offences under Sectinos 380 IPC in Crime No.431 of 2011, the petitioner has come up with this petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2.According to the case of prosecution, the poultry feed worth Rs.1 lakh belonging to the de-facto complainant found missing. Subsequently, it was found somewhere near the poultry farm of the petitioner. It is from this circumstances, the petitioner has now said to be arrayed as an accused in this case. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has got nothing to do with the poultry feed, which is seized. 4.In my considered opinion, because the poultry feed was recovered somewhere near the poultry farm of the petitioner, the petitioner sought to be included and thus, the petitioner has made out a case for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, but with conditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for the purpose of interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. sd/- 01/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VALLIYOOR TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PANAKUDI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S. J.JOHN JAYAKUMAR Advocate SR.No.37375 rl/6c – 3.11.2011 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14209 of 2011 Date :01/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/