ssm 1 919.chs.2.08 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 2 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO. 2610 OF 2001 Dr. Kausar A. Hirani ....Plaintiff Versus Hasmukhben M. Bdaji & Co. ....Defendants ____________ Mr. Z. A. Jariwalla i/b. Thakore Jariwall & Asso. for the Plaintiff. Mr. Vikram Shinde i/b. Vigil Juris for the Defendant Nos. 1A, 1C, 2 and 4 to 7. CORAM: R. M. SAVANT, J. DATED : 3 RD MAY, 2011. P.C.: The above Chamber Summons was pending when the decree in terms of Consent Terms dated 5 th August 2010 was passed. By the above Chamber Summons, the Plaintiff seeks setting aside of the abetment qua the Defendant No. 1 and further seeks that the heirs may be permitted to be brought on record. Incidentally, when the decree was passed, the heirs were already on record as the Defendant Nos. 1A to 1C. The amendment ssm 2 919.chs.2.08 sought, is formal. The learned Counsel appearing for the Defendant Nos. 1A, 1C, 2 and 4 to 7 has no objection to Chamber Summons being allowed. The Chamber Summons is allowed and made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c). Office is directed to draw the decree in terms of the amendment i.e. which is permitted by the instant order. (R. M. SAVANT, J.)