HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR WritPetitioa(S)No. 1286 of2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Ram Sundar Jaiswal S/o late Shri Laxmi Prasad Jaiswal, aged about 40 years, R/o Tirigipur, Ward No. 9, Radhasagar Gali, New Bus Stand, Katghora, District Korba (CG). VERSUS 1.8tate of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Department of School EducatiorL DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). 2. Accountant Geneml, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG). 3. Accounts Officer, Office of the Accountant General, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG). 4. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Korba (CG). (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Asmhotri, J.} Present : Shri Rajendra Tripafhi, Advocate forthe petitioner. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer fbr the State. Ms. Shamiila Sin^ii, Advocate for the respondent No. 2 & 3. ORALORDER (Passed on 4th day ofMarch, 2009) With the consent ofthe parties, the matter is taken up for hearmg fiiially. 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the case, being payment of retiral benefits matter, may be referred to the Pension Coiiimittee. 2. This Court, in the matter of W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other connectedmatters,directedfhe Conmiittee to consider the matter ofthe retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Comniittee was constituted by the State Govemment, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Govemment and others) and order dated T..- Sahii 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105/2008 (State of Chhattisgarh and otliers Vs. Baijnafh Mandal and another). Thus, fhis petition is squarely covered by Uie judgment and order dated 31^ of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. Tlie State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other connected matters, as submitted by the leamed counsel appearing for the parties. This petitioh is disposed ofin the same teims i.e. the office offhe Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date ofreceipt ofacopyoffhis order and a copy ofthe papers from the petition. Thereafter, fhe Conimittee shall issue notice to the petitioner ajad the offlcers concemed, witliin a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order/ in accordance with law, aftcr affording proper opportunity ofhearmgto the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concemed may file additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, mcluding payment of retiral dues, ifany, to the petitioner., may be completed wifhin a period offour months from the date ofreceipt of a copy ofthis order. One extra copy ofthe papers oftilie petition shall be supplied bytfae leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner to Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer, and Ms. Shannila Singhai, counsel ibr the respondent No. 2 & 3, today itself, for transferring the sanie to the committee. Consequently, pending applications, ifany, stand disposed of. Sd/- i SatishK.Agnihotri i Judge