FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CA/12162/2008 GODAVARI V/S VITTHAL ... 1. This is an application for stay of the impugned judgment and award. 2. Shri Sangale, learned Advocate submits that in fact the present respondents are not entitled for the amount as awarded by the Reference Court. According to him, the Special Land Acquisition Officer has awarded an amount of Rs.30/- per sq. meter but the Reference Court has exorbitantly enhanced it to Rs.15/- per sq. ft. without there being any evidence on record and therefore, the respondents are not entitled for said amount. He submits that the applicant may not be directed to deposit such an huge amount. 3. Shri Bhavthankar, learned Advocate for respondent vehemently opposes the application and submits that the Reference Court has considered all material on record and thereafter passed the the order. 4. The impugned award tantamounts to money decree. The arguments of Shri Sangale, learned Advocate can be considered if the respondent moves an application for withdrawal. The award is carrying interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum and as such, it would be also in the interest of the applicant to deposit the amount so that the interest would stop running. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS (2) CA/12162/2008 5. In this view of the matter, the application is allowed. Impugned judgment and award stands stayed on condition that the applicant shall deposit the total amount under the award in this within a period of twelve weeks from today. Dt.11.3.2011 (S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.) akl