1 APPLN 4222 OF 2010.sxw vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4222 OF 2010. Parag Pandurang Kamble .. Applicant -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr. Rohan R Sonawane i/b Mr. M.B. Shirsat, for the Applicant. Mrs. Geeta Mulekar, Additional Public Posecutor for the Respondent State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 26th November, 2010 P.C. 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail by a Director of Corporation which is registered in Nagpur and had duped people in Konkan area. The offence which is registered is in respect of misappropriation of Rs.1,04,000/-. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant is not at all involved in the misappropriation of any amount, but in order to show his bonafides, he would deposit Rs.10,000/- as he is one of the Directors of the Corporation. It is not clear as to why the applicant's custodial interrogation is required. In view of this, in the event of applicant's arrest in CR No.47 of 2008, registered at Ratnagiri Rural Police Station, for the offences punishable under 2 APPLN 4222 OF 2010.sxw Sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code, he be released on bail on his furnishing PR Bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate sum of Rs.25,000/-, on the following conditions. i) The applicant shall deposit an amount of Rs.10,000/- within a period of two weeks from today, before the learned Trial Court which the learned Trial Court shall invest in the nationalized bank to earn maximum interest and shall deal with the same at the end of the trial as per result of trial. ii) If the applicant fails to deposit the aforesaid amount within the stipulated period, the order shall stand revoked. iii) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by C. I. D. Officer, Pune on 1st December, 2010 at 10.00 a.m. and thereafter as and when required Investigating Officer. iv) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; v) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the trial Court. 3 APPLN 4222 OF 2010.sxw vi) The order shall remain in force till the chargesheet is filed. (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)