IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12590 of 2011 BALDEO DAS @ MANOJ KUMAR DAS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 04.05.2011 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 302, 349 of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The accusation against the petitioner is that he along with son took the brother of the informant and caused fire arm injury to the victim. From the fardbeyan of the informant it appears that the informant was at his house and has not seen the occurrence but he was only witness to the last seen. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that during investigation no eye witnesses has supported the accusation since the occurrence took place at 4:00 A.M. in the morning and the petitioner is a government servant. Considering the nature of accusation, this Court is not inclined to interfere. Let learned Court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner keeping in view that the informant does not appear to be the eye witness of the 2 occurrence. With the observations made above, the application stands disposed off in connection with Jamalpur P.S. Case No. 17 of 2010. Let the order of this Court be transmitted through FAX to the learned Court below at the cost of the petitioner. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)