1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.599 OF 2008 IN REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.4 OF 2008 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.429 OF 2006 Shri.Satish Kumar Tiwari. ...Petitioner vs. 1.Smt.Kiran Tiwari & ors. ...Respondents. --- Mr.A.C.Singh i/b. A.D.Yadav, for Petitioner. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. DATED: 1st August, 2008. P.C.:- 1. This is a notice of motion taken out by the original respondent in Arbitration petition no.429 of 2006, for condonation of delay in filing review application. The order of which review is sought is dated 20.11.2006 and 20.10.2006. The explanation 2 given for delay is that a notice of motion was taken out for review of the order. That was wrongly taken out and therefore, this review application has been made. Perusal of the record shows that Notice of Motion no. 4415 of 2007 which was taken out by the applicant was taken out in the year 2007 and that notice of motion was withdrawn on 29.11.2007. The present notice of motion has been taken out on 13.2.2008. In the affidavit filed in support of the notice of motion, there is no explanation for the period from 29.11.2007 till 13.2.2008. In the affidavit, even the date on which the notice of motion no.4415 of 2007 was filed is not mentioned. It is obvious that the delay is inordinate and there is no explanation given for the same. Hence, the delay cannot be condoned. Notice of motion is disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) ---