IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS FRIDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2011 / 18TH CHAITHRA 1933 OP (FC).No. 1433 of 2011(R) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER (S): ----------------------- SIVANKUTTY NAIR, PUNNARAVILAVEEDU, ALAKUNNAM, PEYAD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.B.KRISHNA MANI RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. MAHESWARY, SAROJALAYAM, ENCHIPULLUVILA, JRA 70, PAPPANAMCODE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 607. 2. ADARSH, SAROJALAYAM, ENCHIPULLUVILA, JRA 70, PAPPANAMCODE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 607. 3. AJESH, SAROJALAYAM, ENCHIPULLUVILA, JRA 70, PAPPANAMCODE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 607. 4. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (R.R.), NEYYATTINKARA-695 121. R4 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.M.KAMMAPPU. THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/04/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------ O.P.(FC) No.1433 of 2011-R ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 8th day of April, 2011 J U D G M E N T K.M.Joseph, J. Petitioner challenges Ext.P4 and also seeks a direction not to proceed with Exts.P3 and P4. There is a further prayer for directing the Family Court, Thiruvananthapuram to permit the petitioner to pay the amount claimed in Ext.P4 in easy installments. 2. Petitioner is the respondent in M.C 94/2005 filed by respondents 1 to 3. Ext.P1 is the order passed allowing the M.C. Against the same, the petitioner filed RPFC 305/2009 which was dismissed vide Ext.P2. Thereupon, Ext.P3 execution petition was filed and pursuant to it apparently Ext.P4 revenue recovery notice has been issued under the Revenue Recovery Act. 3. We heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. We are of the clear view that this petition is not maintainable against Ext.P4. We are not notified of any jurisdictional error in the matter. Hence we dismiss the OPFC 1433/2011 -2- Original Petition. However, we make it clear that this will not stand in the way of the petitioner approaching the Family Court and seeking the benefit of payment of amount in installments. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. (M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS) JUDGE. MS