HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 409 of 2009 (S/S) Vimla Pundir … Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and three others. … Respondents Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, Standing Counsel for the State. Dated: April 29,2009: Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. With the consent of parties, the writ petition is being disposed of at the admission stage 3. The petitioner who is working as Assistant Teacher in Junior High School, Naithana, Block Kirtinagar, District Tehri Garhwal was transferred on 25.07.2008 to Junior Higher Secondary School Khongcha, Kirtinagar, District Tehri Garhwal. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the petitioner was transferred vide order dated 25th July 2008 but she was permitted to continue on the post. Now the respondents are asking her to join at the new place of posting. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is still discharging her duties but she is not being paid salary since October 2008. 5. During the course of arguments learned counsel for the petitioner confined his prayer that representation of the petitioner dated 26.12.2008 (contained as annexure no. 5 to the writ petition) may be decided by the concerned authority within the period prescribed by this Court. Learned Standing Counsel did not oppose this prayer. 2 6. The prayer being innocuous, the respondent no. 3/ Additional District Education Officer (Basic) Tehri Garhwal is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner before 31st May 2009. Since the petitioner is being permitted to work at her present place of posting, she is permitted to continue on the same place till her representation is decided by the respondent no.3. 7. With these directions the writ petition is finally disposed of. 8. No order as to costs. (V.K. Bist, J.) 29.04.2009 NCM: