1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.10.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.BASHA AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL Writ Petition (MD)No.11981 of 2011 K.Rajalingam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Wing, Virudhunagar District, Collectorte Campus, Virudhunagar. 2.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 3.C.Panchavarnam President, South Venganallur Panchayat Rajapalayam Panchayat Union, Virudhunagar District ... Respondents Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to conduct fair and proper enquiry in regard to the Panchayat Fund being swindled by the 3rd respondent and file a final report within a time limit. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu For Respondents : Mr.S.Venkatesh, 1 & 2 Government Pleader O R D E R [Order of the Court was made BY K.N.BASHA, J] The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition seeking for a direction to the 1st respondent to conduct fair and proper enquiry in regard to the Panchayat Fund being swindled by the 3rd respondent and file a final report before the court concerned within a time frame. It is seen that in this regard, the petitioner has submitted a representation to the 1st respondent on 05.11.2010. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2.Mr.S.Venkatesh, learned Government Pleader, takes notice for respondents 1 and 2. We are of the view that notice need not be issued to the 3rd respondent, since the interest of the 3rd respondent would also be protected by this order. By mutual consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final hearing at the time of admission itself. 3.Considering the limited prayer sought for, this Court, without going into the merits of the representation of the petitioner, is constrained to direct the 1st respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 05.11.2010, and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and also to the 3rd respondent. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter and it is for the 1st respondent to consider the same and pass orders on its own merits and in accordance with law, as directed above. 4.With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AS) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To: 1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Wing, Virudhunagar District, Collectorate Campus, Virudhunagar. 2.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. +1cc to Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu, Advocate, Sr.No.36172 +1cc to the Special Govt.Pleader, Sr.No. 36193 gb ssk/09.11.2011 /5c -2p/- ORDER IN WP(MD)No.11981/2011 Dated:19.10.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/