mLE 3mm“ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHA‘ITISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No. 599$ /2011 / M/s. Ambuja Realty Development Limited, Through its I Deputy Manager (Marketing), Shri Randeep Singh Chaddha, S/o. Shri I R.S.Chaddha, aged about 28 years, ' I resident of Flat No. E~3, Ratan ‘i Palace, Katora Talab, Raipur (C.G.). VERSUS, RESPONDENTS 1f, State ofChhattisgarh, Through Secretary Department of Urban Development, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, G.E.Road, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Municipal Corporation, Through Commissioner, Municipal W, Corporation Raipur (C.G.). 3. The Zone Commissioner, Zone - II, Municipal Corporation, Raipur W(C.G.). 4yThe Town Planner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur (C.G.). PETITIONER WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. On the behalf of the petitioner following is respectfully submitted:— m w HKEH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BfLASF’UR WRIT PETmGN (C) NO. 5993 OF 2011 PETmONER M/s. Ambuja Reaity Devewpmem Lémked. Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Pemfon under Amcie 22$ of the Constitution of India) Singie Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Presént :n Shri Aiok Nigam, Advocate for :he petisioner. Shri V.V.S.Murthy, Dy‘ Advocaie Genera! for the $iate. \‘g ”‘ ‘ ORDER 3:31 (Pa55ed 0n this Hm day of October, 291 1) V 1.. Leamed ceuEsel appearing for the peiitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with iiberty to take recourse to statutory appeiiate forum that may be availabie under the provisions of iaw. 2. it is ordered as prayed for. R 3, Accordingiy, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn wirh . iwmrxwow ww r above~stated iiberiy. " Sd/_ SATISH K. ANGNIHORI Judge eehok ‘ L V