IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1882 of 2007 SHYAM NANDAN SINGH Versus THE BHARAT WAGON ENGINEERING COMPANY LTD. AND OTHERS. ----------- 5. 18.3.2010. Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Udai Choudhary, learned counsel representing the Bharat Wagon Engineering Company Limited are present. By order dated 13.1.2010, the petitioner was directed to present himself before Respondent No.2 Managing Director, Bharat Wagon Engineering Company Ltd, within a period of four weeks from the date of the order and satisfy him that he has vacated the quarter in question and whereupon the Managing Director was directed to make payment of the entire admissible dues of the petitioner. This matter was thereafter taken up on 5.3.2010 and Mr. Choudhary filed a supplementary counter affidavit mentioning therein that despite the direction of this Court, the petitioner has not vacated the quarter as yet. Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh had prayed for some to verify the position and thereafter the matter has come today when Mr. Singh again submits that he has no instructions in the matter. Having regard to the circumstances 2 aforesaid, I am not inclined to grant indulgence to the relief prayed by the petitioner. He may raise his grievance before the Managing Director of the Company but only after vacating the quarter(s) in question, the occupancy whereof has been alleged against him. In so far as the Company is concerned, they are at liberty to take all remedies as available to them in law for vacation of the quarter(s). Though Mr. Singh learned counsel for the petitioner again made attempt for adjournment, but looking into the conduct of the petitioner, he does not deserve indulgence by this Court. This writ petition is dismissed. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)