^ \^ 81NGIE BENCH i <s IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTJSGARH AT BELASPUR w.p.<S)jNro. H 331 of 2011. I'ETCITIONESS :i. \\ ...."*; ^^••^••:. ^^>;>:2" ^2^\v....-"" / .^.^y ^ ^^ 3. Sanjay Pandey., aged about 41years^ S/o JSJari Hari Prasad, Resident of Village- Malhar^ Tahashil Masturi, District -Bilaspur. (CG.). Siiklisa^ar Jangde^ aged aboirt 36 years S/o Shri Gariba Jangde,, Resident of Village- Satnami Mohalla, Ambedkar Nagar Jaitpur, District, Bllaqmr. (CG<), Ramlal Kaiwartya»aged- about37 years S/o Shri Bhagbali, Resident of Village-, Malb^-y TahaAit Masturiy Disteict - Bilaspur. (06.). VE.RSUS f ^ ^'\ RESPONDENTS: 1. State of CG. Ttoough: The Secretary^ Riu-al Developm-ent aad Department of Panchyat, D.K.S. BJiawan Raipur, C.G.). 2. ChiefExecutive Officer Jaapad Panchayat Matum, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. District Collector Bilaspur, (C.G.) f 4. Block Educatioii Qfficer Masturi, Bilaspur,(C.G.) ,. -5. VMM^d. M Lal Shanna aged about 33 years, resi-dent of Village LoharsL, Distri^t - Bila^ur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/2270F THE CONSTITUTION QF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRII IN THE NATURE QE MANDAMUS CERTIORARI, PRQHIBITION AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WMT QM 5VBITS ORDER OR ORDER& DHtECTIQN QR DIRECTIONS, ± T rr ^sf "^I^Kri^, ^Tll-H^Ko, [s|<rtl<H^< ..^.f.&)....^l^.L/J.L ^l^dl ^^|cb "•"''' /"-^ 200 ^TT^T^R^ (^f^^qr) ^IT^T ^T f^^Jcb 'cT^TT 311^1 5?>*4|cb (IW^ '^TTW^fiH ^TT^T SB : Ho2i?ble Shri Manindra M^han Shriimstava, J. 8.8.2011 Shri Yogeshwar Sharma, <j Shri Pravin Das, Dy. Govtj No, 1 to 4, on advance copy. Heard on admission. cni^t<n<fli ^i^dl* ^f fs^l <F3l^l< ^ 3TRPT 3:[?^T ounsel for fhe petitioners. Advocate for fhe State/respondents petltjio The gnevance of fhe is fhat fhough fhe petitioner^ Guruji, fheir orders persons were given (Annexure P-8), the Chief Execij caUed for information from Pauchayat, Masturi and Block of appointa^ent appointn3|ent flke 4oners as setout in fhe writ petition, were selected for appoiatEiient as were not issued, whereas, other Vide memo dated 1.10.2008 i(itive OfB.cer, Jila Panchyaty Bilaspur Chief Executive Oflicer, Jaupad ^ducation Ofiicer, Block-Masturi, Learned counsel for the memo dated 1.10.2008 (Anae^ure forwarded to fhe Chief Executil^e but till date, no decision petitioners. h4s Taknig into consideratio counsel for the petitioners petitioners relates to inaction aiijd ^etitioners submits fhat pursuant to P-8), relevant iritbrmation was Officer, Jila Panchayat^ Bilaspur, been taken m. fhe case of the ^L fhe submission made by learned further that the grievance of the cjn the part of fhe respondents in not -F XI-HC—78 ^ '3'^r r^i^ii<ri^, ^T{1^4!<o, [®i<ni^^< ^M^I ^-»<n^» •^200 ^TT^T TT5RF (Ti^33T^) 3^T ^T f<ylich <T8TT 3^?T 5h+4ich K-aveen. ^HWTrf^T 317^1 taktag decision in respect of the| to direct the Chief Executive take decision in fhe case oftfae t>etitioners. Accordingly, this petition to the Chief Executive Officer! decision in the case of fhe petit^ matter by fhe Chief Executive ({ receipt of copy of this order, ftjie take recourse to remedy as iiia}1 <=ni^(<n41ri Tn1R1o?rf ^ 'fexst iFt^K ^3tRR31T^T claim offhe petitioners, it is proper ;)flicer, Jila Panchayat, Biiaspur to is finaUy disposed of wifh a direction , Jila Panchayat, Bilaspur to take oners. If no decision is taken in the )fi&cer ia 3 months from the date of petitioners would be at Hberty to be available to them under fhe law< Sd/- ManindraMohan Shrivastava Judge