IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO. 842 OF 2009 AND MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION ST.NO.13379 OF 2009 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 233 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 975 OF 2008. (SAU. MANORAMABAI NARAYANRAO PAWAR... VS. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, AMRAVATI & OTH.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Shri P. S. Patil, Advocate for Petitioner. Mrs. T.D.Khade, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1. CORAM : A.H.JOSHI & A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 10, 2009. 1. Accepting the reasons assigned in the application towards delay caused in filing application for restoration as well as reasons towards absence on the date when the letters patent appeal was dismissed, which are good and sufficient, both the applications are allowed. Letters Patent Appeal No. 233 of 2008 is restored to file. JUDGE JUDGE RR. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 233 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 975 OF 2008. (SAU. MANORAMABAI NARAYANRAO PAWAR... VS. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, AMRAVATI & OTH.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Shri P. S. Patil, Advocate for Petitioner. Mrs. T.D.Khade, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1. CORAM : A.H.JOSHI & A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 10, 2009. 1. Heard. 2. Issue notice for final disposal, returnable on 7th December, 2009. 3. The appellant should take steps to serve respondent by taking Hamdast and, if required, special bailiff. JUDGE JUDGE RR.