IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1055 OF 2011 (M/S) Lalit Mohan Arya ….………Petitioner. Versus Kumaon University and another. ….…..Respondents. Present: Mr. D.C. Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.D. Upadhyay, Advocate for the Kumaon University. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.(Oral) Heard Mr. D.C. Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. B.D. Upadhyay, Advocate for the Kumaon University. The petitioner had applied in response to an advertisement / notice published by the Kumaon University for picking up the used answer-books, etc. and thereafter another notice was published on 22.5.2011 for cancellation of the earlier tender. The grievance of the petitioner is that nothing has been done in the said tender and another notice has been issued stating that in the earlier tender notice, since there was subsequently a dispute, all the tenders have been cancelled and fresh advertisement was published, whereby freedom was given to all the persons to participate in the auction. The petitioner has challenged the same stating the same to be arbitrary. This argument of the petitioner is absolutely misconceived. There is nothing illegal in the fresh tender notice being given and the petitioner has no right to challenge the same, as no 2 prejudice has been caused to him much less there being violation of any law. The writ petition is therefore without any merit and is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 27.5.2011 Rathour