-HG—78 an^i vf Ww TTSTT 3TT^T ^)*if<^ *fT*idr^>*ii^ 'S'ST •^i<<i<yi-i|, ®fll<-i'i|<o,fs<<<ii'Mli< . ^.cw}^-^ /s g •••^200 3n^T'q^q? (1clfj°<<'E() wgiwgfCTCT^i PBTTTIONER {DE-FENDAKT MO. 1J Ueep^K Kestiwaai, son ot Late K.K. s\lt7Hsi. a2er! sbout 45 vesrs, L, ^t^-^A lA-^u-u.*- ." J W"-^»/; rroprtetor 01 M/s Kajdeep Uement iF'actory, MQiiu.^ctu.rer, r/o of Uuin^rtarai, Kaipur Pipe Versus RESPOnDEn'T-S (PIaiatiBl 1. Kajv Rnn resi^ent 01 M-ia, irr^auon Uolony, T???ir|n-r ^s. Statl CoUj naij.] WRI'T PETTTiON UNDBK AIRTICLB 227 OV THB CONs'TrrUTIQn O R QFmD!A BLL ORDB DauenfU'a Misbra. J. Shri B.P. Shanna wiut pentioner. SiinArun Hao, Uovt. pjj. The petitioner has in^ Annexure V-i passed ay No. 39A/2007. ine sfiort question ui^ji whether fhe Court below ttie respondent/ plaiuutt cliTectuig Uie peUGoner to aud possessor ofttie suit ladcl <tii^<n<fli ^W^ff ^ f«^<f^i^i< ^3fRn3Dt?i Uiiibarlsar, son ot Late Uaianand UizilosTksr, ssed Rbout 46 ys&rs. ot (Jluiattisgaril, ttirougn tae ^ctor. Rainzir. CoUectorate Office. UA 9-4-2008 Shri Kshitii Sharma, Advocates for Uie Aldvocate lor uie Htate. the order dated 27-2-2008 of District Judge, Raipur in Civil Suit u4pugned leat'ned jolvea lor consiaerauon ot uus peuuon is w^s justitied iu aUowiug f&e appUcation of utider yection 151 ot Uie C.l-'.iJ. and ultorm t&e uourt as to w&o is Uie owner at present. -HG—78 ail^t ^l R-l ^TSff •Sn^T sti*l?eh *11*(?ir thHlch T^ •<<i<<iw<4, ®til'Mii<o,[si<niy^< (^y ^). C^-"2-7) T^o' ^-D86/^b6g Jf^ 200 sn^i T5W (Tpf3°issr) TOI1W: ^lftg 3D^I doculaents, Learuea counsel tor tfae provisioa ot Urder VI from ln July, 2002, fhe particuJaTs ui ttie purporte( fhe C.P.C. The plaJTitifF ia (j.F'.u. toraiscoverv ot 151 ofC.P.C. Mearct. In Uie plainttB's suit] Uie petiuoner is (tetenctaat. ttie pleaduig ui para 3 ot UK as pleaclea Uiat ttie suit clirectecl t&e cletenaant to mtoi and possessor ot me suit ln Uie considerea t&e leamea Uistnct Juclge] gross tailure ot justice v| supei-yisoiy junsdicUon India. If fhe petitioner fails Uie unpugnea orcler, ttie in accordaace wifh law, Witti ttiese observatiolns t}ie petiuoner subinits tiiat after repeal of 5 of Civil Prcxsedure Code wifh. ellect papies cannot be clirected to supply Detter 4 exercise ot power under Hecnon l&l ot l|)lace of resortiag to Oid.er Xi Rule 12 of i, nas tuea appucation under Section laidd <=hl^icl<<"ll 'lTP^ff ^f 1^T^t <F5R^I< ^aifinan^r itor specmc pertormauce ot me contract, Fhe Court below taldng iQto consideration written stateiuent wherein fhe defendaat is not in tus possession at present, tias :onn ttie nanie ot ttie person wtio is owner lalid opi(uon ot vais Court, tae unpugned oMer ol fl.as not caused aoy grave mjustlce or arrantuig uiterteience wtule exercisuig Article 227 of ffae Constitution of LO funush the ioformation, as directed Dy Uistnct Judge may diaw mterence uticler le&niea tfae ueution is aisnosed ot. Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge