1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Second Appeal No.348/2010 ( Shri Laxman s/o Godruji Tarankar ..V/s.. Govindlal s/o Mohanlal Kothari (dead), Ms Manjushri d/o Govindlal Kothari & one another ) With Second Appeal No.349/2010 ( Shri Laxman s/o Godruji Tarankar ..V/s.. Govindlal s/o Mohanlal Kothari (dead), Ms Manjushri d/o Govindlal Kothari & one another ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. S.D. Deshpande, Adv. for appellant. Mr. N.A. Vyawahare, Adv. for Respondent no.1-A. CORAM : SMT. V.A NAIK, J. DATE : 6th DECEMBER, 2010. Common order. The learned counsel for the parties presented a pursis in the Court today. The same is accepted on record. The learned counsel for the parties have also presented a compromise deed along with the pursis. There is an endorsement of the thumb impression of the appellant on the pursis and the pursis is signed by the respondent nos.1 and 2 and also by the learned counsel for the parties. It is 2 stated in the pursis that the compromise deed has been prepared in this case in Marathi language as the appellant was not in a position to understand English and follow the terms of the compromise deed if it was prepared in English. The compromise deed is accepted on record and is marked as Exhibit Z for the purpose of identification. The compromise deed is signed by the respondent nos.1 and 2 and the appellant has affixed his thumb impression on the same. The learned counsel for the appellant and the respondents have also signed the compromise deed. The appellant and the respondent nos.1 and 2 are personally present in the Court today. It is stated in the compromise deed inter-alia that the respondents have paid a sum of Rs.65,000/- to the appellant in cash. The appellant, who is present in the Court today, has acknowledged the receipt of Rs.65,000/-. I have asked the parties whether they are agreeable with the terms and conditions stated in the compromise deed. The appellant as well as the respondents have answered in the affirmative and have stated that they are ad-idem over the terms stated in the compromise deed. I have perused the contents of the compromise 3 deed. They appear to be just and reasonable. Hence, the Second Appeal Nos.348/2010 and 349/2010 are disposed of in terms of the compromise deed. A decree be drawn accordingly. No order as to costs. In view of the above order,C.A.S.Nos.622/2010 and 917/2010 in Second Appeal No.349/2010 and C.A.S. Nos. 621/2010 and 918/2010 in Second Appeal No.348/2010 do not survive, hence disposed of. Judge Tambaskar.