IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1635 of 2008 OF MOTION NO. 1635 of 2008 OF MOTION NO. 1635 of 2008 in in in INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1225 of 2008 TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1225 of 2008 TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1225 of 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax-14 ..Appellant Vs. Shri Chandanmal Jain ... Respondent Mr.S.M.Shah for Appellant None for Respondent CORAM CORAM CORAM : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan and : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan and : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan and A.V.Nirgude, A.V.Nirgude, A.V.Nirgude, JJ JJ JJ DATED DATED DATED : 11th June, 2008 : 11th June, 2008 : 11th June, 2008 P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. None appears for the respondent. Affidavit of service is on record. Perused the affidavit. By this notice of motion, the appellant is seeking condonation of 152 days delay caused in filing the appeal. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay and there is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). {A.V.Nirgude, {A.V.Nirgude, {A.V.Nirgude, J) J) J) (Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, (Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, (Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J) J) J)