IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 581 OF 2010 SHRI GOVIND VASSUDEV GAWADE AND 3 ORS., ... Petitioners Versus SHRI TULSHIDAS SHIVA GAWADE ... Respondent Shri Arjun Naik, Advocate for the Petitioners. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 3rd August, 2010 P.C.:- Heard. The Petitioners are Defendants. This Writ Petition is directed against Order dated 29-4-2010 by which plaintiff's application for amendment has been granted. Although the written statement has been filed by the Defendants, the suit is still at the stage of deciding the application for temporary injunction. The amendment has been allowed by the learned trial Court stating that the amendment is only clarificatory in nature. The plaintiff had earlier restricted the suit property to survey no.263/9 of Pale Village but by the proposed amendment they have sought to bring in survey no.185/1 as part of the suit property. This is not a case where any injustice is being caused to the Defendants. They can always file an additional written statement to the amended plaint and defend the suit. The impugned Order being an interlocutory Order which causes no injustice to the Defendants, in my view, this is not a fit case for interference in extraordinary jurisdiction.(See Abdul Razak(dead) through L.Rs. and others v. Manguesh Rajaram Wagle and others((2010) 2 SCC 432). The petition, therefore, is hereby dismissed. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.