IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. 46075-M of 2007. Date of decision:-08.4.2008. Sunil Dutt Bansal ...Petitioner. Versus State (Union Territory of Chandigarh) ...Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present:- Mr. G.S.Sandhawalia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Standing counsel for U.T. Chandigarh. Mr. Deepak Arora, Advocate for the complainant. RAJESH BINDAL J. The dispute in the present case is between the brothers where the allegations and counter allegations are regarding misappropriation of the money from the business run by them jointly. After registeration of the FIR, the industrial unit owned by them has been sold by the bank for recovery of its amount. It is not disputed that the petitioner had joined the investigation. Be that as it may, without recording any finding on the merits of the controversy, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 18.9.2007 is made absolute. The petition is disposed of. 8th April, 2008. (RAJESH BINDAL) asija JUDGE