:1: :1: :1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.671 OF 2004 OF MOTION NO.671 OF 2004 OF MOTION NO.671 OF 2004. IN IN IN SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1795 OF 1986. SUIT NO. 1795 OF 1986. SUIT NO. 1795 OF 1986. Hoshi K. Siganporia. ..Plaintiff. VERSUS. Central Bank of India. ..Defendants. **** AND NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.672 OF 2004 OF MOTION NO.672 OF 2004 OF MOTION NO.672 OF 2004. IN IN IN SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1796 OF 1986. SUIT NO. 1796 OF 1986. SUIT NO. 1796 OF 1986. Smt. Villoo Siganporia & Anr. ..Plaintiffs. VERSUS. Central Bank of India. ..Defendants. **** AND NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.673 OF 2004 OF MOTION NO.673 OF 2004 OF MOTION NO.673 OF 2004. IN IN IN SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1794 OF 1986. SUIT NO. 1794 OF 1986. SUIT NO. 1794 OF 1986. Mrs. Villoo K. Siganporia. ..Plaintiff. VERSUS. Central Bank of India. ..Defendants. **** Mr. P. R. Naidu for the plaintiffs. None for the defendants. Coram: Coram: Coram: V.M.KANADE, J. V.M.KANADE, J. V.M.KANADE, J. Date: Date: Date: 17th August, 2004. 17th August, 2004. 17th August, 2004. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiff. None appears for the defendants though they have :2: :2: :2: been served. The plaintiff seeks an order of restoration of the suit which was dismissed for default by order dated 25th September 2003. It is stated that the Advocate on record of the plaintiff expired and as a result the suit was dismissed for default. In my view the sufficient cause is shown by the plaintiff for his non appearance on 25.9.2003. The notice of motion is therefore allowed. Suit is restored to the file. Plaintiff to send advocate’s notice to the defendant that the suit is resorted. (V.M.KANADE,J.) (V.M.KANADE,J.) (V.M.KANADE,J.) /2004/