1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 768 OF 2009 Dharmendra Jeevan Nagarkar & Anr. ...Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Amit Sale for the Petitioners Mr. A.S. Gadkari, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE: AUGUST 13, 2009 P.C.:- The petitioners filed a complaint before the police against certain police officers, who, according to them, were not registering it. Therefore, they filed a private complaint, and the learned Magistrate referred the matter for investigation to the police. The police has already filed a report before the learned Magistrate, stating therein that the complaint was false, and this information has been given to the petitioners by 2 the learned Magistrate. Now, the petitioners want that the investigation should be transferred. 2. We fail to understand as to why this Court should intervene at this stage, when the learned Magistrate is already seized of the matter, and the petitioners are entitled to put forth their say before the learned Magistrate before he passes an order on the report filed by the police. With this observation, the Writ Petition is dismissed. BILAL NAZKI, J. A.R. JOSHI, J.