1 c.a.3918.09 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3918 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.149 OF 1988 [Sadba Mahadji Pole Dead through L.Rs. And others Vs. Madhavrao Goplaro and others] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri.Ajay T.Kanawade,Advocate holding for Shri.S.B.Talekar,Advocate for Applicants None for the respondents. .... CORAM: SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATE : 25TH FEBRUARY, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants. 2. This is an application preferred by the applicants for condonation of delay of 10 days, caused in filing present application for restoration. 3. Considering the contents of the application it appears that the applicants have explained the delay 2 c.a.3918.09 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders satisfactorily. It also appears that the said delay is not willful, deliberate and intentional, and hence, same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 4. In the result, present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause [A] thereof, and delay of 10 days caused in filing application for restoration stands condoned and present application stands disposed of accordingly. Sd/- [SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J.] MTK