IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 6811 OF PETITION NO. 6811 OF PETITION NO. 6811 OF 2005 . 2005 . 2005 . Narmada S. Karekar & anr. ... Petitioners. V/s. Ranjana Chandrakant Dhuru ... Respondent. Shri P.R. Kadam for the petitionesr. Shri R.A. Thorat for the respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. : V.C.DAGA, J. : V.C.DAGA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 7.12.2005. : 7.12.2005. : 7.12.2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : ---- ---- ---- . Heard rival parties. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioners is not pressing this petition on merits. However, he seeks one year’s time to vacate the suit premises. He has filed usual undertaking dated 7.12.2005, undertaking to vacate the premises on or before 5.12.2006. Learned Counsel for the respondent fairly stated that he has no objection for grant of time to vacate the premises, subject to acceptance of the undertaking furnished by the petitioners. He further states that the petitioners be directed to pay reasonable amount by way of occupation charges during this period of one year, subject to adjustment in the mesne profits. Submission appears to be reasonable. 3. In the above view of the matter, undertaking furnished by the petitioners is accepted and taken on record. Petitioners are directed to pay Rs.150/- p.m. to the respondent by way of occupation charges, on or before 5 day of every month. It is made clear that failure on the part of the petitioners to pay occupation charges for 2 months, respondent shall be entitled to execute the decree in accordance with law.