IN TH E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-21958-2011 (O&M) Date of decision:30.08.2011. Gagandeep Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Gopal Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. A.S.Rai, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Liakat Ali, Advocate, for the complainant. ***** Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. This is a petition for grant of pre-arrest bail in a case registered vide FIR No.30 dated 11.02.2011, under Section 304-B IPC at Police Station Nakodar, District Jalandhar in which Section 302 IPC was added lateron. The petitioner had earlier applied for pre-arrest bail vide CRM- M-18444-2011 when the case was registered under Section 304-B IPC in which interim bail was initially granted on the ground that the petitioner is Devar of the deceased but the said bail application was dismissed as withdrawn on 18.07.2011 because it was found by the Court that before filing of the petition, the challan was presented and the petitioner has been challaned under Section 302 IPC as well which was not incorporated in the bail application. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case but in her supplementary statement, the complainant Ranjit Kaur had alleged that the deceased Rajwinder Kaur @ Razzi used to state that the petitioner had also been giving her beatings. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the facts and circumstances of this case, I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Hence, the present petition is hereby dismissed. August 30, 2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) vinod* Judge