THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT APPEAL No.920 OF 2008 AND W.P.No.15241 of 2008 JUDGMENT: (PER Hon’ble Sri Justice B.Prakash Rao) Heard Sri Vedula Srinivas, the learned counsel for the appellants and also the learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies and at their request the main appeal itself along with writ petition is taken for disposal. The writ appellant is the unsuccessful petitioner, who by way of this appeal seeks to assail the order dated 16-7-2008 of the learned Single Judge passed in an interlocutory application in WPMP.19722 of 2008 in WP.15241 of 2008. The writ petitioners who are fair price shop dealers ﬁled writ petition challenging G.O.Ms.No.35 dated 17-9-2007 along with an interlocutory where they sought stay of all further proceedings by suspending the operation of the said G.O. However, the learned Single Judge by taking note of the fact that any bifurcation made of the petitioner’s fair price shop shall be subject to the result of the writ petition and disposed of the Miscellaneous Petition. Hence the appeal. It is submitted across the Bar that subsequent to passing of the order under the respondents ﬁled a counter aﬃdavit wherein taking note of the economic viability necessary directions have been given to safeguard the interests of every one. For convenience sake, the said para in the counter affidavit sworn to by Mr. N.Sridhar, District Collector, Anantapur District reads as follows: “It is submitted that in pursuance to the directions issued in G.O.Ms.No.35 dated 17-9- 2007, the District Collector, Anantapur has instructed the Revenue Divisional Oﬃcers concerned in the District to submit the proposals for rationalization of existing F.P. Shops in their respective divisions with the instructions that attachment of required number of ration cards to each F.P. Shop should be done properly for convenience of the cardholders in the locality keeping in view the economical viability of the F.P.Shop.” Having regard to the aforesaid speciﬁc averments made in the counter aﬃdavit the very provision goes on behalf of the petitioners and the petitioners approaching this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India does not hold any water and need not be gone into. In view of the above and taking note of the same, both the Writ Appeal as well as Writ Petition are disposed of. No costs. ___________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO,J) ___________________ (R.KANTHA RAO,J) Date: 15-09-2007 Grk THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO (T he Judgment of the Bench delivered by the Hon’ble Sri Justice B.Prakash Rao) WRIT APPEAL No.920 OF 2008 AND W.P.No.15241 of 2008 Dated:15-09-2008