IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18842 of 2011 UTTAM KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.6.2011 After having heard Shri Manoj Kumar learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Parmeshwar Mehta, learned A.P.P. for the State and Shri Sanjay Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the informant, the Court is not inclined to direct the release of the petitioner on anticipatory bail. However, it may be a good case for grant of regular bail in the background of admitted fact that the deceased and the petitioner were deeply in love with each other and on account of some frustrating circumstances they had decided to kill themselves. It is true that the allegation is that the petitioner handed out poison to the deceased and himself also took the same as a result of which the deceased succumbed to the substance whereas the petitioner survived. But, except the speculation, there does not appear any real evidence. That could be considered by the court below while considering the regular prayer for bail of the petitioner as and when the petitioner surrenders and pray for it which must be considered without being prejudiced towards the fact that the petitioner had preferred the anticipatory bail petition up to this court. The petition stands disposed of. Let this order be transmitted to Chief Judicial 2 Magistrate, Bhojpur(Ara) in Ara Nagar P.S.Case No. 44 of 2011 through fax at the cost of the petitioner. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)