IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18360 of 2011 Smt.Kalp Lata Sharan, wife of Sri Upendra Kumar, Resident of C/O Sri Upendra Kumar, Vijay Nagar, Shiv Shakti Kunj, Road No.8, P.S. Danapur, P.O. Veterinary College, District Patna. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. Program Officer (Establishment)-cum-District Program Officer, Office of District Superintendent of Education, Patna. 5. Range Education Officer now know as Program Officer, Anchal- Golghar, District Patna. 6. Accountant General, Bihar, Patna, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna. ... ... Respondents. ---------------------------------- 3. 19.10.2011. Heard Shri Ram Kishore Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Ranjeet Kumar Singh, learned A.C. to A.A.G.14, who appears on behalf of respondent nos.1 to 5/State and Shri Ranjan Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.6/Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. The petitioner, who retired as Assistant Teacher on 31.5.2011 from Government Middle School B & C, Mithapur, Patna, has prayed for directing the respondents to clear all her retiral dues. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner in the writ petition had also claimed for G.S.S. amount, but after filing of the writ petition, same 2 has been paid. Other retiral dues have not been paid. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that petitioner has made specific statement that petitioner’s service remained up to mark and no complaint whatsoever was reported from any corner. In view of the facts and circumstances, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the respondents to pay all the retiral dues of the petitioner and take steps for issuance of appropriate sanction order regarding retiral dues of the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Thereafter, respondent no.6/Accountant General is required to issue authorization within four weeks from the date of receipt of the sanction order from the State authority. It is further clarified that there shall be no delay in crediting the amount as per authorization issued by the Accountant General to the account of the petitioner. The oral submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner is that on the date of retirement, no proceeding 3 either departmental or criminal was pending against the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. It is made clear that this order may not be given effect to in case there was a departmental or criminal proceeding pending against the petitioner on the date of retirement. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)