-^ uoKs)^J^f/o^ JN-JSE-M^^^S^DESH,JSlIi?&Anii3_®IBUNAL:J^ALPUR. • Original Appiication ^o^U^Ql 1995. APB.ICANT BISPON:DENT ^^•^. ^.^^ Bet^eeo " , "^ • • . • ' . ' QGPALIaCNGH,Aged.-54years, , • Soo @£ Ramlal Sirgh, Assista Dt Sub-Inspeotoi? of' Pol ice, Do Ddi Lohara, Office of SuperinteodeDt ol' Police, Dis tc i ct DURG, (M. P.) , ^ . Re si de nt o£, Don di. Lo hara, 'District DU'RQ, (M.P,»), And 1 State 6f ^Iadbya Pradesh ' .Thro ugb Sec'rstary Hotae DepartmeotCPolice), Tallabh Bhawan, BEIOE^.( M.^. )'„ /- 2 Dir'-ector Generalof Polics, PoliGe Head Quarter, BHOPAL.,(M,P.),., ; , -, 5 lospector Seoeral of Pollce, Railway Police, - Near Asseigbly H Oose, a opal,: (M..P.) ,' 4 SyperiDtendent o£ Police, D istrict. Durg, . DUE1G, (M.:]?. ). ' .. -" 4p£ii£^I£01J^S-^SSS£lJ^^£^^ TM§MM^^2I*_12.§2A ' • .—— -It HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON fS) No. 1074 of2005 APPLICANT RESPONDENT8 Gopal Singh. VERSUS State ofMadhya Pradesh & Others. APPLICATION UNDERSECTION 19 OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALACT.1985 SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnfliotri, J. Present: None for fhe petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lswyer for flie State/respondents. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 27m day ofOctober, 2009) 1. The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor any representation is made on behalfofthe petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. 2. In view ofthe above, the matter is dismissed for want ofprosecution. 3. Registry is directed to send a copy ofthis order to the petitioner, forthwith. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihom Judge Aimt