IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8017 of 2010 1. NISHA DEVI WIFE OF SURENDRA RAJAK 2. MAMTA DEVI, WIFE OF JAISHREE RAJAK 3. JAISHREE RAJAK, SON OF RAMBALI RAJAK, ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KALER, P.S. KALER, DISTRICT ARWAL --- PETITIONERS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR—OPP. PARTY. ----------- For the petitioners : Mr. Satish Chandra, Adv. For the State : Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, A.P.P. ----- 5/ 07-07-2010 Heard the parties. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case instituted for offences under section 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Unfortunately petitioner no.3 happens to be the own son of the deceased Panbashia Devi and petitioners no. 1 and 2 are the daughters-in-law of the deceased. In the F.I.R. vide Annexure-1, the informant, the full brother of petitioner no.3, has admitted that some dispute regarding partition of the family property was going-on between the informant and his full brothers including petitioner no.3, and therefore, he suspected that petitioners may be responsible for committing the crime in question. Subsequently the statement of the informant was recorded under section 164 Cr. P.C. vide Annexure-2, wherein he has contradicted the entire prosecution version. The informant has clearly stated that his brothers were not responsible for the murder of the deceased. Even 2 during the course of investigation the witnesses have not supported the prosecution allegation against the petitioners. In the facts and circumstances, in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Dwijendra Kumar, J.M. Ist Class, Jehanabad in connection with Kaler P.S. Case No. 22 of 2009, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. BTiwary ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J)