4-. c ^ IN THE HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR r3>^79. W.P.NO." ~^ 12003 PETITIONER: Ramlal Chauhan S/0 Panchram / Aged about 42Years,Occupation -Peon R/ORajiv Gandhi Nagar,Mithumuda, Post &Tah. Raigarh, Distt.-Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1 .State of Chattisgarh Through Secretary, Agriculture(Fishery) Department D.K.S. Parisar, Raipur(G.G.) 2. Asstt. Director,(Fishery) Distt. Raigarh(C.G.) 3. Asstt. Director,(Fishery) Distt.Jashpur(CA.l 4.Ramgopal Sidar.Peon Office ofAsstt. Director,(Fishery) Distt. Jashpur (C.G. ^^s^ ..-<'^^"1/ WRITPETITION UNDER ATICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 311^1'qiT ft-ii-* an^i Sb*4 'gf%(( .-.t 'Td -41'41cl-4, (?Tfl+l«l'B, fawwy wqyir gi*n<sb ^^M-n^ ^ fq^H' an^i'^giw^rf?!! 19J2.; Shri Sunii Otwani, counsel Shri Prwee" bas, Pane! Hear-d both the counse!. sy this writ petition und^ India, the petitioner has chd|en| (Amexure P-1). by which he -hcs bistrict; Jashpur. The petitionerj Department of Fisher-ies. Learned eounset for the ^ of the ©overnmetrt, Armexwt transfewed from one dlstrict to TTie second orgument of the petitioner has been transferred ^ it is evldent from the tr-csnsfer ^ the sane h-as been sent to the P..-] thfft' at the Instance of the ther respondent No.4, the petltioner h] Having heard the iearned the facts and circumstances of] petltioner should be allowed to counsel for the State/responden'l jtioner is ailowed to make |for +he petitioner". Lffl^yer for the State/respondents 1 to 3. Artiele 226/227 of the Constitution of ^ed the tronsfer order dated 27.09.3303 flseen tronsfer-red from District; Raigar+i to |is working as Chowkidcr, tempdrar-ily In the grievcnces within a period of ten •qri?pNiiFTai ^ fstA' •^ aflign sii^i i^titioner submitted that as per the plicy P-5, Ciass-IV employees cannot be janother district, beii^ low paid employees. leai|ne<^cpunsei fo" the petttioner is that the fmp!y to accommodate respondent No.4 and |rdeR (Annexure P-1) itse'f that e copy of .A. to tiie then Home Minister and it shows Home nAlnister in order to accommodate t»sbeen transferred. c^unse! for the parties and having regard to the case, I arn of the opinion that the |make a r'epcesentation to whieh learned- |'s 1 to 3 has no objection. Therefore, the |» detailed rept'esentatlon rasing all his |days from tod<y to resppndent No.l and in XI-HC-22 an^l^il W 31)^1 ^4-i ^^ /'•. -- 5oma ...*l^.~<»^_ '\. -yi n- ^ t^ ^" '" .'-^;. "3 f •^w\vt^, •^-Sw^, hywy. ^IWWShilpb .y.^.3^2 2803 fcl'b^" sii^?[ ^gTaK ^i)??r ^ turn respondent No.l shall deeide from the dcste of receipt of the ref the gr-ievances of the petitioner ond m an objsctive manner with a petitioner is not reiieved he should decided. ^ With the observations and d tljie same within a period of thiriy days p(-esentotion taking into cpnsideration all t-he relevant circulor of the ©overnment order. In ths meon time, ff the rjot be relieved til! his representation is reastned noi Consequently, AA.(W.P.No.33<! disposed of. Parties are entitled for cer-tif ed copy of this order 4)|<4ld1!4l'r1 'qW^*^ 1^T^ ^t^l'i '^•SI^TO 3B^I rections, the petltion stands disposed 6/2003 and I.A.No.l0563/2C»3 dso \ Sd/- L.C. Bhado jydge n, [1[T^ ^Tia^