1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO. 263, 343 & 425 OF 1996. Abdul Jamil Ab. Waquil Vs. Taj Mohammad Miya Mohammad Rabiya Begum Sk. Ismail & Ano. Vs. Naseem Ara Jameel Ab. Jameel Naseem Ara Jameel Ab.Jameel Vs. Rabiya Begum Sk. Ismail & Ano. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Kadu Adv for appellant. Shri Ansari Adv for respondents. CORAM: C. L. PANGARKAR J. DATED: 20 th AUGUST, 2009. Counsel for the appellants as well as respondents in all the three appeals are present. The appeals are compromised. 2 Naseem Ara is present before the Court, Abdul Jameel is present. Minhaj Mohammad, Aijaz Mohammad, Akhtar Bano and Mumtaj Bano are also present before the Court. Parties to the compromise admit the terms of the compromise. Decree be drawn up in terms of compromise and all the appeals stand disposed of in terms of compromise. Court fee as per rules be refunded. JUDGE svk