IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17496 of 2010 SAMIR TIWARI @ BABLOO TIWARI . Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR . ----------- 2. 14.06.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State as also the learned Counsel for the informant who has appeared suo motu. The contention of the petitioner husband in a Police case under Sections 498A of the Penal Code and Sections ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act is for revival of matrimonial harmony for which he has filed an application under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act sometime prior to the present allegations. Counsel for the informant submits from the allegations that she was forced to consume alcohol and smoke cigarrete to her dislike, a person holding qualification of M.A. This Court does not consider the present a fit case for the privilege of anticipatory bail. If the petitioner surrenders in the court below within a period of four weeks from today and prays for regular bail, his submission of being desirous for revival of matrimonial harmony shall be adequately kept in mind when the trial court may consider the issues of grant of provisional bail if satisfied, so that the marriage if possible may be saved, while issuing notice to the complainant on the date that the petitioner furnishes his bail bonds. Any such consideration for regular bail has to be without prejudice to the present order. The application stands disposed with the aforesaid observations. Let this order be communicated to the court of CJM Bhojpur at Arrah in connection with Shahpur PS Case No. 9 of 2010 at the cost tobe deposited by the petitioner. Snkumar/ (Navin Sinha,J.)