-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 135 OF 2004 The State of Maharashtra..... .....Applicant. Versus D. G. Pavase..... ..... .... Respondent. Mr. Rajesh More, APP for the Applicant - State. Mr. Shivraj Patil with Mr. S.D.Patil for Respondent. CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2006. DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2006. DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: Learned Counsel for the Respondent makes a statement that the trial is over and the learned Special Judge, Thane is at the fag-end of the matter. The prosecution claimed privilege regarding a document. Now nothing remains in the revision since the trial is over. Hence the revision is disposed of as infructuous. -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-