IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43083 of 2010 KUNDAL @ KUNAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the state. Petitioner is an accused for offences punishable under sections 341, 323, 324, 379, 504, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the allegation is otherwise but the injuries are simple in nature. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the allegation of theft is also false and ornamental and there was no occasion for the petitioner and other co-accused persons to commit such an offence, specially when the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In case of surrender/arrest within fifteen days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in the court below, petitioner, namely Kundal @ Kunal shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000.00 (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of likewise amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City (Patna) in connection with Didarganj P.S. Case No.26 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure. Harish (S.N. Hussain, J.)