1 S.B.Cr. Misc. Bail Application No. 2672/2007 (Harish Kumar vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : July 04, 2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Pradeep Shah, for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, P.P. for the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and the police investigation diary. From perusal of the police investigation diary, it appears that the District Excise Officer, Sri Ganganagar on 9.3.2007 issued a licence for selling the country made liquor in favour of the petitioner but instead of selling the liquor manufactured in Ganganagar Sugar Mill, the petitioner has been selling the country made liquor manufactured in Harayana named as “SAUNFI Special” etc. as has been mentioned in the seizure memo through co-accused Badal Singh, Buta Singh and Vijay Pal at a place other than mentioned in the liquor licence. In the circumstances, therefore, it cannot be said that the petitioner is authorized to sell the illicit liquor manufactured in Haryana. 2 In this view of the matter, in my view, it is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail, on the contrary it is a fit case warranting custodial interrogation. The bail application filed by the petitioner under section 438 Cr.P.C. is, therefore, dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-