IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.154 of 2009 JAGDEESH SINGH, SON OF LATE PAPPU LAL SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – MAHENDRAPUR, P.S. HATIDAH,DISTRICT – PATNA ------DEFENDANT-PETITIONER. Versus 1. RAJESHWAR SINGH ,SON OF LATE PAPPU LAL SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – MAHENDRAPUR, P.S. HATIDAH, DISTRICT – PATNA. ---PLAINTIFF – OPPOSITE PARTY 2. REENA DEVI, WIFE OF LATE RAM PRAWESH SINGH 3. SINGH BAHINI 4. SUMA JAY SERIAL NO. 3 AND 4 ARE MINOR DAUGHTERS OF LATE RAM PRAWESH SINGH, UNDER GUARDIANSHIP OF HER MOTHER – SMT. REENA DEVI, OPPOSITE PARTY NO. 2 HERE. SERIAL NO. 2 TO 4 ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – MAHENDRAPUR, P.S. HATIDAH, DISTRICT – PATNA. ---DEFENDANTS – OPPOSITE SECOND PARTY ----------- 2. 30/1/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Defendant-petitioner has challenged the order dated 22.12.2008 passed by the Munsif, Barh, in Title Suit No. 03 of 2003 whereby the court has allowed the prayer of the plaintiff to examine the witnesses outside the list of witnesses which was furnished earlier by the plaintiff. The trial court has allowed the prayer on consideration of the stand of the plaintiff that the witnesses of list have been gained over by the other side compelling the plaintiff to seek permission for examining some witnesses who have not been named in the list of the plaintiff’s witnesses. I do not find any jurisdictional error in the impugned order dated 21.12.2008 which warrants interference of this Court in its revisional jurisdiction. This Civil Revision is dismissed. S.Ali (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)