IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM THURSDAY, THE 24TH JUNE 2010 / 3RD ASHADHA 1932 RP.No. 502 of 2010(A) IN RCR.3/07 ------------------------- REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 5 ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. MRS.K.VIMALA DEVI, AGED 61 YEARS, W/O LATE BANGARU BHAT, RESIDING AT 8/125, NEAR SHANTHAKAMAKSHI TEMPLE, SOUTH CHERLAI, MATTANCHERY, COCHIN-02. 2. MISS.JAYANTHI.B., AGED 41 YEARS, D/O.LATE BANGARU BHAT, DO. DO. 3. MISS.JAYASREE.B., AGED 39 YEARS, DO. DO. 4. MR.JAYAKUMAR.B., AGED 36 YEARS, S/O.LATE J.BNGARU BHAT, DO. DO. 5. MR.JAYAPRASAD.B., AGED 33 YEARS, DO. DO. BY ADV. SRI.C.HARIKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): REVISION PETITIONER/6TH RESPONDENT ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MR.GOVIND.M., AGED 41 YEARS, S/O.N.MADHAVA MALLAYYA, RESIDING AT 8/35, PRABHUS BACK STREET, SOUTH CHERLAI, MATTANCHERY, COCHIN-02. R.P.502/10 -2- 2. MRS.VEDAVATHY, W/O.MADHAVA MALLAYYA, RESIDING AT 8/35, PRABHUA BACK STREET, SOUTH CHERLAI, MATTANCHERY, COCHIN-682002. ADV. SRI.DINESH R.SHENOY THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & C. K. ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ R. P. No.502 of 2010 in R. C. R. No.3 of 2007 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 24th day of June, 2010 ORDER Pius C. Kuriakose, J Having regard to the submissions addressed by Sri.C.Harikumar, the learned counsel for the review petitioners and by Sri.Dinesh R. Shenoy, the learned counsel for the respondent, we do not find any warrant for invocation of this Court's jurisdiction for reviewing its own orders and judgments which is limited by Rule 1 of Order 47 CPC. At the same time, we notice that two mistakes have crept into our judgment at paragraph 2. Mr.Jayakumar is referred to in that paragraph as the only son of his parents. It is R. P. No.502 of 2010 -2- clarified that Jayakumar is not the only son of his parents. So also in the last line on Page No.2 the word “received” is wrongly used. The word “received” will stand deleted and substituted by the word “necessary”. The Review Petition is disposed of as above. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE C. K. ABDUL REHIM JUDGE kns/-