IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 7784 of 2005 Between: Tummla Madhava Rao, S/o. Narsinga Rao, Proprietor of M/s. Raja Rajeshwari Stone Crusher, Gopalpur(V), Elkurthi (M), Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Govt. of India, rep. by its Joint Chief Controller of Explosives, South Circle, 14, Marshalls Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. 2 Dy. Chief Controller of Explosives, Kendriya Sadan, 1 st Floor, Sultan Bazar, Koti, Hyderabad-500 095. 3 Collector & District Magistrate Karimnagar District, Karimnagar. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the District Collector, the 3rd respondent herein, in canceling his anterior order dt.11.05.1999 by Procs.No.C1/5251/04-1 dt.23.12.2004 as illegal, void and inoperative and consequently declare that the order in Procs.No.AP2184/E dt.29-03-2005 issued by the 1 respondent is equally illegal, void and inoperative and set aside the same and to pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.J.VENKATESWARA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No.7784 of 2005 ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the very subject matter of the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Recording the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous and consequently W.P. M.P. No.10334 of 2005 stands dismissed. No order as to costs. ____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J. Dt.01-06-2009. skmr