IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 28.01.2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN W.P. Nos.23066 and 23067 OF 2009 and M.P.Nos.1 and 1 of 2009 Mr.V.Vijayakant .. Petitioner in W.P.No.23066 of 2009 V.Premalatha .. Petitioner in W.P.No.23067 of 2009 Versus 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax Central I, New No.46, Old No.108, M.G.Road Nungambakkam, Chennai- 600 034. 2.The Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals I) New No.46, Old No.108, M.G.Road Nungambakkam, Chennai- 600 034. 3.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle I (2) New No.46, Old No.108, M.G.Road Nungambakkam Chennai- 600 034. .. Respondents in both W.P.'s PRAYER IN W.P.NO.23066 OF 2009: Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent in C.No.1571/56-62/C-I/2009-10 and to quash the order dated 30.09.2009 and direct the first respondent to grant absolute and unconditional stay of collection of tax demand and interest relating to the assessment years 2001-02 to 2007-08 pending disposal of the appeals before the second respondent. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ PRAYER IN W.P.NO.23067 OF 2009: Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent in C.No.1571/42-48/C-I/2009-10 and to quash the order dated 06.10.2009 and direct the first respondent to grant absolute and unconditional stay of collection of tax demand and interest relating to the assessment years 2001-02 to 2007-08 pending disposal of the appeals before the second respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.C.V.Rajan (in both W.P.'s) For Respondents : Mr.K.Subramanian, (in both W.P.'s) C O M M ON O R D E R Though the prayer sought for by the petitioners in the present writ petitions is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that it would suffice, if the Appeals, in WTA Nos. 1 to 7 of 2010 and WTA Nos.8 to 14 of 2010 , are directed to be disposed of by the second respondent, on merits, within a specified period. 2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 3. Accordingly, the second respondent is directed to dispose of the Appeals, in TA Nos. 1 to 7 of 2010 and WTA Nos.8 to 14 of 2010 , on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of ten weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioners shall co-operate in the hearing of the Appeal proceedings. With the above directions, these Writ Petitions are disposed of. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. Sd/- Asst.Registrar. /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar. arr/vs https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ To 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax Central I, New No.46, Old No.108, M.G.Road Nungambakkam, Chennai- 600 034. 2.The Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals I) New No.46, Old No.108, M.G.Road Nungambakkam, Chennai- 600 034. 3.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle I (2) New No.46, Old No.108, M.G.Road Nungambakkam Chennai- 600 034. 2 ccs to Mr.R.Sivaraman, Advocate, SR. 5391, 5392 1 cc to Mr.K.Subramaniam, Advocate, SR. 5162 W.P. Nos.23066 and 23067 OF 2009 and M.P.Nos.1 and 1 of 2009 NM (CO) kk 24/2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/