's- ,@ HISH^QURT OF CHHATTrSGARH AT BIL4SPUR Writ Petition No. 287/20(te CORAtt: Hon'ble Shri S.K.Nayak. Chief Justice & Hon'ble Shri Dilip Rcosaheb Deshmukh, J. Petitioner Respondents Mani Bai, W/o Late Vishashar, R/o Amlipara, P.0. Ohuma, Thoma-Takha'tpur Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh represented by Secretary, Etepartment of Home, O.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur (C6). 3 2. Superintendent of Police, District Si^aspur 3. Station House Officer, Thakhcrtpur, Bilaspur (CG) Shri Pramod Verma, Additional Advocate Seneral for the State. ORAL ORbEft (Possed on 20th AAarA, 2006) The following oral order of the Court was pois%d by S.R.NAYAK, C.J. That complaint of the petitioner is that though Crime No.177/2005 was registered at -the Police Station, Takhatpur, District Bitaspur on 31.05.2005 for offence under Section 376 read with Section 34 I.P.C., the accused are not yet arrested and the Investigating Police sleep over the matter. 2. In response to the notice issued by us, Shri Pramod Verma, leamed Additional Advocate ©enerat took notice on behalf of respondents at the time of hearing, totd us that the Investjgating Officer is before the Court- and he has brought the records which would diow that the accused ftaton Lat woiS arrested on 16 February 2006 ond -the remaining •two co-o.ccused on 20 February 2006. 3. In view of this development, no furl-her steps need be taken. 4. Writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. Sd/- TheChiefJustice Sd;- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge .A-niB3,<?r^C