IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2875 of 1994 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- L.B.VAGHELA Versus DY.CONSERVATOR OF FOREST -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR PH PATHAK for Petitioner MS PS PARMAR for Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE Date of decision: 14/07/97 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this matter is squarely covered by decision of this Court in Special Civil Application No.5025 of 1993 and other cognate matters decided on 28.4.97. A copy of this Judgment is taken on record. 2. I have gone through the petition as well as Judgment of this Court aforesaid and I am satisfied that this petition is squarely covered under the said decision and this petition deserves to be disposed of in terms in which the aforesaid Specail Civil Applications have been disposed of. Order accordingly. 3. In the result, this Special Civil Application is disposed of in the terms that the Government Resolution dated 17th October 1988 is applicable to the employees of the Forest Department as well and they are entitled to the benefit under the aforesaid Government Resolution for the period from 1.10.1988, i.e. the date from which the Resolution was made effective and onwards and the amount which may be found due shall be examined and calculated in this case and shall be paid to the petitioner at the earliest possible opportunity, but not later than 15th October 1997. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has not pressed any other contention in the matter. The Special Civil Application and Rule stands disposed of in aforesaid terms with no order as to costs. ....... (sbl)