IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.18742 of 2011 Date of Decision : October 13, 2011. Parshant Kumar .....Petitioner versus Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.K.D.S.Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of respondent No.2- College to rusticate him vide order dated 5.10.2010 (Annexure P-5). The petitioner is said to have served the authorities in the Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak as also the respondent-College, with a legal notice against the above stated order of rustication. It may be mentioned here that the petitioner has been rusticated by the College due to his involvement in a criminal case pertaining to the violent attack on a student of the College. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the appropriate recourse for the petitioner would be to persuade the University-Authorities to take a lenient view in the CWP No.18742 of 2011 [2] matter. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to put the legal notice of the petitioner before the appropriate Authority who shall then pass an order in accordance with law, within a period of one month from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. October 13, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE