IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.11318 of 2011 Ramandeep Kaur ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.D.D.Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner was appointed as a Guest Faculty on account of the fact that the study of the students was suffering. As per the policy, preference is to be given to a candidate from the same village/town, block and district. The petitioner belongs to the village, which is in the State of Punjab, i.e., a different State. The petitioner apparently has been made to relinquish the post she being from a different State. If the preference is to be given to a person belonging to the village where school is located, then appointment of a person from a different State may be open to question. That may not now be relevant as the petitioner on the asking of the respondent-Principal has already submitted her resignation. Once the petitioner has resigned, no case for interference is made out, even if the plea is that the resignation was forcibly obtained. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. July 04, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE