IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 8663 of 2001 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- BHANUPRASAD J JANI ROW HOUSE NO C-115 Versus DEPUTY MANAGER, CPF, FCI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 8663 of 2001 MR DAKSHESH MEHTA for Petitioner No. 1 RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 1 MR HM BHAGAT for Respondent No. 2 MR PJ MEHTA for Respondent No. 3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL Date of decision: 03/03/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT Mr.Mehta for the respondent No.3 at the outset submitted that the respondent No.3 authority has prepared the proposal for disbursement of pension and the same is forwarded to Delhi office and the said proposal shall be sanctioned within a period of three months from today and within the said period the disbursement of the amount as sanctined shall also be made. 2. In view of the aforesaid statement no further order is required to be passed in this matter except observing that the respondent No.3 shall abide by and comply with the aforesaid statement made by his counsel. 3. It would be open to the petitioner to make representation for payment of interest for delay caused in disbursement of Rs.45,000/- and if such representation is made, the concerned authority shall decide the same in accordance with law as early as possible and preferably within a period of three months from the date of such representation. 4. Petition is disposed of subject to aforesaid observations and rule is discharged. There shall be no order as to costs. Liberty to apply in case of difficulty. 3.3.2004 (JAYANT PATEL,J)