WP(C) 5019/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Hazarika, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Sa ikia, learned standing counsel PWD appearing for the respondents. The grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that though p ursuant to various work orders issued by the authority from time to time, he exe cuted all the works to the satisfaction of all concerned, an amount of Rs.1,42,9 57/- is still due and payable to him, which has not been paid to him despite var ious approaches made. The learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the issue in the present writ petition has already been answered in Tamsher Ali & ors. Vs. State of Assam & ors. reported in 2008(4) GLT 1 and as such the present writ petition may be disposed of in terms of the directions contained in the aforesaid judgme nt. Having regard to the facts and circumstances as projected by the petitio ner in the present petition and the aforesaid submissions made by the learned co unsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of directing the Chief Engi neer, PWD (Building) to verify the claim of the petitioner and if upon such veri fication it is found that any amount is due and payable for the works done, his name shall be enlisted in the register maintained by the department. The amount found as due and payable to the petitioner shall be paid to him as per his turn. The verification part as well as the enlistment of the petitioner’s name in the register shall be made within a period of 3(three) months from today. The payme nt of the amount found to be due and payable, however, shall be made as per turn of the petitioner. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.