IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 9210 of 1994 Date of decision : 18.10.2011 Amarjit Singh Cheema ...Petitioner versus Punjab State Electricity Board and another ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Nemo for the petitioner. Mr. D.S. Brar, Advocate for the respondents. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) The bare perusal of the record would reveal that nemo had appeared on behalf of the petitioner on October 04, 2011, when this writ came up for hearing. Consequently, the petition was adjourned for arguments. Today again no one is present on his behalf despite the case having been repeatedly called. From the sequence of events narrated here-in-above, it appears that neither the petitioner nor his counsel is interested in pursuing the petition. Therefore, no option is left with this Court except to dismiss the petition for non- prosecution. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. October 18, 2011 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) naresh.k Judge