IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18956 of 2009 Raj Kumar Prajapati, son of Bahadur Prajapati, resident of village Mokaram, P.O. – Telari, P.S. Kudra, Distt. Kaimur (Bhabhua). ------- Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar ---Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 27.06.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioner who is the Informant of the case is aggrieved with the order dated 1.5.2009 passed in Sessions Trial N. 386 of 1997/11 of 2005 by which the F.T.C.-II, Kaimur at Bhabua has closed the prosecution case without the examination of the Doctor. On going through the order impugned, I find that the Trial court has considered that the occurrence is of the year 1996 and the case was committed to the court of Sessions in the year 1998 and since then it is being pending trial and it is conceded even by the petitioner that summons have been issued to the Doctor concerned which was even received by him despite which he did not appear. Since no laches have been committed by the Court and the Doctor despite notices is not appearing, the Court has no option but to close the prosecution case in view of the long pendency of the same. The application is thus dismissed. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it positively within a period of three months if not done so already. The Trial Court, however, is also directed to send the particulars of the Doctor to his Controlling Officer along with a copy of 2 this order, if the records are still available with the Court so that appropriate action can be taken against him. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)