HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 7162 0f 2007 RES?ONDENTS PETITIONERS : 1. Nemsingh Sahu S/o Shri Motiram Sahu, Age about 41 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primaly Schooi, Nawagaon Block — Berla, Distt. ‘ Durg (0G) 2. Surajlal Nishad S/o Shri Jagannath Nishad, Age about 39 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Boria, Block — Bemetara, Distt. — Durg (C.G.) 3. Jagamath Dhruw S/o Shri Ratan Lal Dhruw Age about 39 years, Head Master, Govt. Primary School, Khudamudi, Block — Bemctara, Distt. — Durg (C.G.) 4. Hiralal Shanna S/o Shri Bhola Prasad Shanna Age about 37 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Pn'maly SchOol, Bawamohtara, Block ~ Bemetara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) . Bhagirathi Sahu S/o Shri’ Tulsingh Sahu, Age about 39 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Majgaon Block — Berla, Distt. Burg (C.G.) 6. Maxmulal Sahu S/o Shri Devsingh Sahu Age about 39 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Lalpur Block ~ Navagarh, Distt. — Durg (co) VERSUS . State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, D.K.S, Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) M District Education Officer, Eistt. — Durg (C.G.) 3. District Education OEwer, Bemetara, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF MDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri; J. Present: Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri ASKachhwaha, Government Advocate for the State/ respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 03a day of December, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the fact and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in and another {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}, which has been disposed of Vide order dated 03.04.2006. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms ofthe order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact asto Whether the petitioners have acquired B3111. Examination Certificate on their own expenses as per the circuiars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sdl— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge t Amit