IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 674 OF 2009 SMT. MANGALA L. PEDNEKAR AND ANR. ... Petitioner Versus SHRI PRUDENCIO CLEMENTE JOSE PEREIRA AND 3 ORS. ... Respondent Mr. D. Pangam, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. Nigel Da Costa Frias Advocate for the Respondents. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 1st July, 2010 P.C.: Heard learned Counsel on behalf of the parties. 2. This Writ Petition is filed by the plaintiffs and is directed against the order dated 9/04/2009 of the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division by which certain photographs which were taken at the time of filing the suit were not allowed to be produced by the learned Civil Judge. 3. Shri Pangam, learned Counsel on behalf of the plaintiffs submits the said photographs though were taken at the time of the filing of the suit, remained without being produced due to inadvertence of the advocate appearing for the plaintiffs. Learned Counsel further submits that in case the said photographs are produced no prejudice will be caused to the defendants. 4. Considering the facts of the case, in my opinion, there is no question of any prejudice being caused to the defendants, in case the said photographs are allowed to be produced by the plaintiffs, in accordance with law. 5. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is allowed and the impugned order dated 9/04/2009 is hereby set aside with leave to the plaintiffs to produce the said photographs. Needless to observe, the production of the said photographs would be subject to proof. N. A. BRITTO, J. NH