IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 32938 of 2011 Date of decision: 5.12.2011 Ramesh Taneja and anr petitioner vs State of Punjab respondent Present:- Mr. HS Dhindsa, Advocate Mr. Kirat singh, DAG, Pb M.M.S.BEDI, J. The petitioners seek the concession of bail in a case registered at the instance or Radhey Krishan complainant alleging that his elder sister Kamlesh Rani was married to petitioner No.1. Petitioner No.2 is son of petitioner No.1 and deceased Kamlesh Rani. As per the allegations in the FIR, Kamlesh Rani was maltreated and harassed by her husband petitioner No.1 and son petitioner No.2, as a result of which she committed suicide by drowning herself in Sirhind canal. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and gone through the facts and circumstances of this case. The petitioners have been in custody w.e.f. 25.8.2011. Challan has already been presented against them. In view of the medical prescriptions of the deceased, produced on the record, it is reflected that being an old lady, she was being treated for cerebral seizures and epilepsy. It will be debatable whether in such circumstances, ingredients of Section 107 IPC are made out against the petitioners. Trial is likely to take a long time. No useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioners in custody during the entire period of trial. The petition is allowed and the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on their furnishing bail bonds/ surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court. December 5 , 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE