1 260.09 SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.260 OF 2009 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.15 OF 2008 Mrs.Sweta Sanjay Kothari ...Appellant Versus Mr.Sanjay Kothari ...Respondent-Applicant ...... Mr.Rushabh Shah i/b Raval Shah & Co. for Applicant/Respondent. Mr.Mohan Jayakar with Mr.Achit Jayakar i/b Khaitan & Jayakar for Appellant/wife. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND R.Y.GANOO, JJ. DATED:- JUNE 29, 2011. P.C. 1. Not on Board. Heard with Family Court Appeal No.15 of 2008. 2. By this Application, the applicant-father has made grievance that access of children was not provided to him as per the understanding recorded in the Consent Terms. By separate order passed today in Family Court Appeal No.15 of 2008, we have finally disposed of the said Appeal. The grievance in this Application, therefore, does not survive for consideration. 2 260.09 3. In future, if the respondent wife fails to provide access in terms of the arrangement recorded in the Consent Terms, it will be open to the applicant-husband to pursue such other remedy as may be permissible including for contempt action against respondent-wife, if so advised. Those proceedings will have to be decided on its own merits. 4. Civil Application disposed of accordingly. (R.Y.GANOO, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)