IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Special Appeal No. 298 of 2011 M/s Gold Plus Glass Industry Ltd., Thithola, Distt Hardwar ….…… Appellant. Versus Union of India and others ………. Respondents. Mr. S.S. Yadav, Advocate for the appellant. Ms. Seema Sirohi, Standing Counsel for the Union of India / respondent No. 1. Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate for respondent No. 2. Mr. B.D. Upadhyaya, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sunil Upadhyaya, Advocate for respondent Nos. 3 to 6. Date of Judgment: 23.12.2011 JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble U.C. Dhyani, J. BARIN GHOSH, C.J. (ORAL) One of the grounds of challenge in the writ petition was vires of certain provisions of the law. The same could, under no circumstances, be decided by the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum. 2. On that ground, we are allowing the appeal by setting aside the judgment and order under appeal and remitting back the matter for decision on merit. (U.C. Dhyani, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 23.12.2011 23.12.2011 Amit