IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (c.G.) WRIT PETITION (C) N0. §8€( OF 2010 / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS: \lF PETITIONER Yudhishthir Prasad Patel, Son of 'Ujjawal Singh Patel, Paged about 63 years, R/o. Tapranga, RS. Tamnar, Tahsil Gharghoda, District Raigarh (C.G.), VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1) State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Department of Revenue Administration, D‘.K.S. Bhawan Mantralya Raipur (C.G.), 2) General Manager, Jindal Steel and Power, Sponge Ltd, Patrapali, ”l Raigarh (CG), 0 f“ o\ i? i6 ’D f 43K 3) Deputy General Manager, Jindal £~ W9 ‘5 e Steel and Power, Sponge Ltd, QyQo ' Patrapali, Raigarh (C.G.), Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.), 5) Sub Divisional Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.), Registrar, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.), HIGH CGURT OF CHHATUSGARH AT BELASPUR WRIT PETITEON (C) No. 5861 ofZOlO ' ’ ITUTION OF ’ ' 1‘as@11t: Ms. Hamida Siddiqui, Advocae for th petitionexz Shm' $l1ashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. (Pssd an 2 day of Occber, 201 as 9 i 0) Ths is an application for withdrawal of the wz‘it peiiiion, on the grounds stated therein. Leamed counsel appearing for other side as n obj ection. h o It is ordered as prayed for. Consequently, the Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with iibeity to iiie a fresh petition, ifso advised. %\ sw- ' ‘Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gown WRIT PETIHON UN§ER ARi‘ICLE 226 OF THE SONST INDIA S}§: Honbie Siiii Satish K. A“: nihatri. J. ? t e ORDER {ORAL LA. No. 4. i PETHIQNER Yxmismim- Prasad Patel VERSUS 1ESPONDENTS Siam ofChimftisgarh & Others