1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1935 OF 2007 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) ST. NO. 2027 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2161 OF 2006 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. JUNE 15, 2007. Heard Shri Somalwar, learned counsel for the petitioner – applicant. The Civil Application is for condonation of delay of 139 days in filing MCA (Review) St. No. 2027 of 2007 against the order dated 22.8.2006 passed by me rejecting Writ Petition No. 2161 of 2006. The review is sought on the ground that the petition has been dismissed after noticing that relevant documents were not filed on record before the School Tribunal. The communication dated 30.3.2002 by the Education Officer about approval and earlier communication dated 4.6.2001 are annexed with review application. In the application for review, there is no explanation as to why these documents were not produced before the School Tribunal or with writ petition. 2 The contention is that the documents were not necessary. In the circumstances, I find that there is no substance in the review as sought on the basis of documents annexed. In view of this, I do not find any reason to issue notice to employee in the matter. The application for condonation of delay is, therefore, rejected. JUDGE *GS.