IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD JUNE 2010 / 2ND ASHADHA 1932 RP.No. 513 of 2010() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN W.A. NO.710/2010 Dated 12/06/2009 AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.7880/2008 Dated 19/05/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/ APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS -------------------------------------------- 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE CHAIRMAN, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, TRIVANDRUM. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (HRM), KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI. ASOK M.CHERIYAN, SC, KSEB RESPONDENT/PETITIONER ------------------------- PURUSHOTHAMAN, KARTHIKA, EZHUPUNNA, ALLEPPEY DISTRICT, RETIRED AS SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT, ELECTRICAL SECTION, AROOR. BY SMT. P.K.RADHIKA THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. --------------------------- R.P. No. 513 OF 2010 IN W.A. No.710 OF 2010 -------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2010 O R D E R Ramachandran Nair, J. Heard the counsel appearing for the review petitioner and the counsel appearing for the respondent. Since we did not state the reasons for dismissing the delay condonation petition, the counsel for the review petitioner has referred to the reasons for condonation of delay and request is to review the order dismissing the delay condonation petition. The counsel appearing for the respondent brought to our notice that this Court had gone through the judgment and looked into the merits of the case and only on being satisfied that the case lacks merit, the delay condonation petition was rejected. Today, when the review is filed, we have again gone through the judgment and we find that relief is granted by the learned Single Judge following the Division Bench judgment in another case which is accepted by the appellants. We therefore do not find any merit in the review petition. Consequently, the same is dismissed. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR (JUDGE ) P.S.GOPINATHAN (JUDGE ) vps WPC No. 2 WPC No. 3