IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4847 of 2011 DR.M.SATYAVATI RAO, DAUGHTER OF LATE M.L. RAO, RETIRED HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS, PATNA WOMEN’S COLLEGE, PATNA UNIVERSITY,PATNA, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT H. BLOCK 3/1-2 NAGARKOT COMPLEX, P.O. KADMA, JAMSHEDPUR, JHARKHAND. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT (HIGHER EDUCATION), GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE PATNA UNIVERSITY, THROUGH REGISTRAR, PATNA UNIVERSITY, PATNA, ASHOK RAJ PATH, PATNA. 3. THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, PATNA UNIVERSITY, PATNA, ASHOK RAJ PATH, PATNA. 4. THE REGISTRAR, PATNA UNIVERSITY, PATNA, ASHOK RAJ PATH, PATNA. 5. THE FINANCE OFFICER, PATNA UNIVERSITY, PATNA, ASHOK RAJ PATH, PATNA. ... ... RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 15.3.2011. Heard Shri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Equbal Ahmad, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.2 to 5 and Shri Vikas Kumar, learned A.C. to learned Advocate General, who appears on behalf of the respondent no.1/State. The petitioner, who superannuated with effect from 30.4.2001 as Professor of Patna University, has prayed for a declaration that he is entitled to get his pension revised in view of Article 16 of the Pension Statute read with State Government decision vide Resolution No.820 dated 23.9.2009 and also for merger of 50% 2 dearness relief on his basic pension with effect from 1.1.2005. The petitioner has further prayed for directing the respondents to make payment of arrears of salary and earned leave. So far as first two reliefs are concerned, the petition stands allowed in view of order dated 3.12.2010 passed in C.W.J.C. No.3616 of 2010 (Dr. Himanshu Bhushan Vs. Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University and others) and other analogous cases. So far as arrears of salary and amount of earned leave are concerned, the petitioner is granted liberty to file a proper representation before respondent no.4/the Registrar, Patna University within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, the respondent no.4 is directed to examine the same and pass appropriate order redressing the grievance of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. In case of refusal, in respect of arrears of salary and payment of leave encashment amount, the respondent 3 no.4 is directed to pass a speaking order within aforesaid time. With above observation and direction, the petition stands disposed of. It is made clear that if the respondent no.4 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for clearing the dues within three months from the date of filing of such representation. The petitioner shall be entitled to get admissible statutory interest. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)