IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3528 of 2008 PRADIP KUMAR JAISWAL Versus KISHORI PRASAD GUPTA & ORS ----------- 3 6.5.2009 Heard counsel for the parties. Counsel for the petitioner would submit that here is a case of flagrant violation of the earlier order of this Court dated 28.11.2008 passed in C.R. No. 1974 of 2008. He would submit that in that view of the matter, the opposite party nos. 1, 2 & 3 are required to be dealt with severely. Counsel for the opposite party nos. 1, 2 & 3 would submit that when the end of the dispute itself seems to be eminent in view of the order passed by this Court directing for concluding the trial within a period of nine months in terms of an order dated 25.3.2009 in C.R. No. 1974 of 2008, the matter relating to alleged contempt should be dropped. Counsel for the opposite party nos. 1, 2 & 3 would submit that if due to inadvertence or otherwise certain acts of the opposite party nos. 1, 2 & 3 have offended the petitioner, they are apologetic about it and they will not repeat it in future. 2 That being so, this Court would drop this proceeding by recording the aforementioned assurance of the counsel for the opposite party nos. 1, 2 & 3 that in future, they will always give due respect to the order of the Court. With the aforementioned observations, this application is disposed of. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)