THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMA MOHANA RAO W.A.No.908 of 2011 JUDGMENT (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) The appellant is aggrieved by an order dated 14.06.2011 passed in W.P.No.22621 of 2005. 2. The appellant was a casual Cleaner in Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation. For his repeated absconding from duty and misbehaviour with the Mechanic Supervisors, he was placed under suspension and after enquiry, he was removed from service vide order dated 12.10.1994 and the appeal filed by him was also dismissed. Challenging the order of removal, he filed I.D.No.150 of 1996 before the Labour Court, Guntur. Through order dated 20.12.2004, the Labour Court allowed the I.D., in part directing the respondents to reinstate the appellant into service as Cleaner with his last pay drawn without backwages and continuity of service and to regularise his services within three months by denying the monetary benefits from the date of removal till the date of the order. Aggrieved by the said order, the Corporation filed W.P.No.22621 of 2005, whereby the learned single Judge set aside the order of the Labour Court to the extent of regularization of services of the appellant as Cleaner while confirming the other findings. The appellant aggrieved by the said order filed the present writ appeal. 3. Heard both sides. 4. Admittedly, the appellant was a casual Shramik i.e., Cleaner in the Corporation. The order impugned shows that the learned single Judge relied upon a decision in APSRTC REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPOT MANAGER, TANDUR DEPOT, RANGAREDDY DISTRICT v. MOHD. ANWAR ALI (W.P.No.26406 of 1999 dated 18.02.2009) wherein this Court held that as much as the respondent has chosen to work on casual basis as a Cleaner, no direction can be given either for his absorption or regularization. In view of the same, the learned single Judge set aside the order with regard to regularization of the services of the appellant and therefore, we do not find any infirmity in it. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J _________________________ NOOTY RAMA MOHANA RAO, J Date:22.11.2011 sj .