IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM MONDAY, THE 1ST MARCH 2010 / 10TH PHALGUNA 1931 RP.No. 209 of 2010(D) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.19079/2009 Dated 15/10/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER: ---------------------- P.K.SURESH BABU, S/O.LATE P.K.PARAMESWARAN NAIR, MATHIYOTTUMADATHIL HOUSE, THIRUVALLAM PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. MR. P.V.BABY MR. R.KIRAN RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. STATE BANK OF TRVANCORE NEDUMANGAD BRANCH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, 2. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, CHIEF MANAGER (ADVANCES)STATE BANK OF TRVANCORE, REGION II, ZONAL OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. MR. K.S.DILIP, SC FOR SBT THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J. ------------------------------ R.P.No.209 of 2010 in W.P.(C).No. 19079 OF 2009 ------------------------------ Dated this the 1st day of March, 2010 O R D E R --------------- While disposing the writ petition this court recorded submission of the petitioner that he is ready and willing to pay off the entire liability and that whatever amount due will be paid within a reasonable time. Accordingly the petitioner was permitted to pay off the entire outstanding balance in 3 equal monthly installments, starting from 30.11.2009 onwards. In the Review Petition it is stated that the submission as above was made under the impression that the balance outstanding will be around Rs.12 lakhs only. But it is mentioned that, the Bank has now issued a possession notice demanding an exorbitant amount of Rs.84,35,055/-. Because of the rider imposed by this court restraining the petitioner from raising any further challenge against the proceedings before any other forum, the petitioner is prevented from raising any dispute against such exorbitant demand, is the contention. Therefore a review of the judgment is sought for. 2. Since the relief granted in this judgment is on the R.P.209/10 in WP(C).19079/09-D 2 basis of the concession made by the petitioner about his willingness to pay off the amount and since it is stated that such a concession was made on the basis of a misunderstanding regarding the balance outstanding, I am inclined to allow the Review Petition. 3. Accordingly the Review Petition is allowed. Judgment dt. 15.10.2009 is hereby recalled. C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE. okb