IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revison No.649 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:02.02.2010. Kamal Deep Singh Grewal ...Petitioner Versus Kuldeep Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Gurinderjit Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. The learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, states that he is not in a position to assail the validity of the impugned order on merits. However, he requests that petitioner – tenant may be afforded little morewhile to arrange funds to pay up the provisionally assessed rent, which runs into a substantial figure. It is argued that the petitioner is a widowed lady and has to fed for self and her children in the absence of her husband, whose whereabouts are not available. It is further pointed out that DDR No.17 dated 25.12.2006 in the context had been lodged with the police of Police Post Burail, Chandigarh. The petition shall stand dismissed as withdrawn. However, in view of the hardship explained by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the time for the payment of the provisionally assessed rent shall stand extended up to 11.03.2010, which shall be deemed to be the first date of hearing for the purpose aforementioned. I am persuaded to grant this order in view of an averment at the bar that though the matter was initially fixed for 01.02.2010 for the payment of the provisionally assessed rent, the learned Rent Controller has already adjourned the matter to 11.02.2010 for that payment. Disposed of accordingly. February 02, 2010 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE