IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND SIX P R E S E N T THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH * * * WP.No.4256 OF 2006 Between: Dr.A.M.Krishna @ Muralikrishnaiah … Petitioner Versus The Mandal Revenue Officer, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati, Chittoor district & Ors. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Dr.A.M.Krishna Counsel for the Respondents: Govt. Pleader for Revenue Sri P.M.Gopala Rao O R D E R : The case of the petitioner is that he has been allotted land under Ex-Serviceman category and ‘DKT’ form patta was granted in his favour in respect of the land in survey no.77 to an extent of Ac:1-80 cents and Acs:3-20 cents in survey no.77/1 situate at Nallamanikalva village of Tirupati Rural Mandal, Chittoor district, vide Proceedings of the Mandal Revenue Officer, Chandragiri, in DKT.NO.622/4/88 dated 30-12-1979. It is stated that in respect of the said extent of Ac:5-00 of dry land, pattedar passbook was also issued by entering his name in the revenue records. It is further stated that when the fifth respondent who is also an Ex-Serviceman tried to dispossess him from the assigned land, the petitioner filed O.S.No.520 of 1997 on the file of the Court of First Additional Junior Civil Judge, Tirupati on 10-6-1997and obtained injunction against the fifth respondent. Now the only grievance of the petitioner is that there is boundary dispute between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents, the petitioner made a representation on 19-11-1998 and duly paid requisite challan of Rs.200/- to survey and demarcate the boundaries of his land and another representation on 16-2-2006 respectively seeking to depute Mandal Revenue Surveyor for demarcation of his land in survey nos.78/1 to an extent of Acs:3-20 cents and survey no.77/1 to an extent of Ac:1-80 cents. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I consider it appropriate to direct the first respondent to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 16- 2-2006 and pass appropriate order on merits and in accordance with law within eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing the petitioner as well as the respondents 4 and 5 and the concerned neighbours for demarcating the land of the petitioner and other neighbours in accordance with the revenue record. With the above direction, the writ petition is accordingly disposed of at the admission stage. No costs. MARCH 06th, 2006. ----------------------- I s L. V. ESWARAIAH , J.