IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12840 of 2009 DR.RAJESHWAR KUMAR SINGH, Son of Sri Chandu Singh, resident of Village- Juyafar, P.S. Nalanda, District-Nalanda. .........Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar........................................Opposite Party. ----------- 4. 5.10.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 287, 304,201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation in the F.I.R. is that the wife of the informant was operated upon by a doctor who had gone from Patna. It is said that the wife of the informant died during the operation. The compounder of this case has faced trial vide Sessions Trial No. 253 of 2008 and was acquitted and petitioner is said to be doctor who allegedly operated upon Babita Devi. Except for the husband, all the witnesses have turned hostile in this case and the husband has stated that he was not present at that time when operation was being conducted, and as such, he is not in a position to point out as to whether the doctor or compounder is responsible for operating on his wife Babita Devi. Be that as it may, the petitioner Dr. Rajeshwar Kumar Singh is directed to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from today in 2 connection with Harnaut P.S. Case No. 310 of 2007 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M., Nalanda at Biharsharif, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. It is made clear that grant of anticipatory bail does not entitle the petitioner to avoid the court during the pendency of this case for the purpose of trial. U.K. (Sheema Ali Khan,J)