-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 442 OF 2009 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 442 OF 2009 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 442 OF 2009 ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 533 OF 2009 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 533 OF 2009 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 533 OF 2009 IN IN IN A.O. NO. 442 OF 2009 IN IN IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. OF 2009 IN L.C. SUIT NO. 732 OF 2009 Harjeet Singh Anand .. Appellant. V/s. The Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai .. Respondents./ Defendants. --- Mr. Prasant Surve for the Appellant. Ms. K.K. Sorran for the Respondents. ---- CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 17th APRIL, 2009 DATED : 17th APRIL, 2009 DATED : 17th APRIL, 2009 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. By the impugned order, ad-interim relief of injunction claimed by the appellant by filing Notice of Motion in L.C. Suit No. 332 of 2009 is refused and the Notice of Motion itself was made returnable on 27th of April, 2009. Since Notice of Motion is not decided finally, the learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the appeal. Leave granted. The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. -: 2 :- 2. Needless to mention that the appellant’s Notice of Motion shall be heard independantly on its own merit, uninfluenced by the order impugned in the present A.O. 3. With the above directions, the A.O. is disposed of as withdrawn. 4. In view of the disposal of the A.O., nothing survives in the civil application and the same is disposed of as such. (R.V.MORE,J.) .....