H1©HCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASWR WntPetition (SVNo.J F^titioner Versus Respondents 1. 2. 3. 4. Jayram Yadav, aged abotrt^yea's. S/o Shri RaBram Yadav, Assistant Teacher Govemment MidcBe SGhool, Bllliband, Bkwk-Kota, District-Bilaspur(C.G.) State of Chhatlisgarh, Through Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G) The Director PuMlc Instructlon Department Raipur (C.G.) District EducaCon CXficer Bilaspur (C.G .) Block Education OfBcer Kda, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITOIN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF tHECOJNS-nTUTIONOF INDIA Smgle Bench : Hon'Ue Mr. Sattsh K. Agni'hofri, J. < . Thakur Shri Dhirendra Mlshra, /telvocate for fte petitioner. Shri Alok Bakshi, Govt. Advocatefortherespondents. ORALORDSB (Passed on tttis 20"' day of February, VXS) The pefitioner was appotnted initially, on a fixed pay of Rs. t50/-. The petifioner was thereafter, granted regular pay wale on compteUon of the probation perfocf. The qu^ition of law involved herein is, asto vrtiether ttie petitioner is entiUed to regular pay scate w.e.f. the date of Inifel appointoent w from the date ofcompletion ofprobation period. Leamed counsel appearing fbr Uie petlfioner, as welt as team«lcounsel appearirH) for the respondenls^tate, jointiy submit at the facte and quesBon of law, invohred inthe pr ent writ petttion, are thesame asto that of in W.P.(S) No. 813Q007( Ram Kumar Sahu & others Vs. State Govt. of Chhaffi^arh & another), whlch was allowed vkle order dated 12.250)7. In view of the above-stated submissions made by teamed counset appearing for the partles. the wnt petitton is allowed in ttie same terms i.e. petitioner is entttled for r^fular pay scate w.e.f. ttie date of inttial appolntment, sutgect to veriffcaflon of the facts. No tirder asto coste. Sd/- "• Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^.tm