IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2208 of 2007 1. Krishna Kumar son of Sidheshwar Prasad, Accounts-cum-Store Assistant, Bihar Rajya Beej Nigam, Patna 2. Binod Kumar Srivastava son of Sri Rama Nandan Sahaya, Accounts-cum-Store Assistant, Bihar Rajya Beej Nigam, Patna 3. Sudhir Kumar Sinha son of Sri Lalan Kumar Sinha, Accounts- cum-Store Assistant, Bihar Rajya Beej Nigam, Patna 4. S.M.Khalid son of Sri S.M.Yusuf, Accounts-cum-Store Assistant, Bihar Rajya Beej Nigam, Patna 5. Onkar Prasad, son of Sri Bihdilal, Accounts-cum-Store Assistant, Bihar Rajya Beej Nigam, Patna 6. Ashok Kumar alias Ashok Kumar Sinha son of Sri Gopal Prasad, Accounts-cum-Store Assistant, Bihar Rajya Beej Nigam, Patna 7. Shivajee Kumar, son of late Shyam Sundar Singh, Accounts-cum- Store Assistant, Bihar Rajya Beej Nigam, Patna 8. S.M. Siddiqui alias Saiyadul Hasnain Siddiqui, son of Sri S.K.G. Rabbani, Accounts-cum-Store Assistant, Bihar Rajya Beej Nigam, Patna Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. N.S.Madhvan, the Chairman, Bihar Rajya Beej Nigam Ltd., Pant Bhawan, 6th Floor, Bailey Road, Patna 3. Vijay Kumar Sinha, the Managing Director, , Bihar Rajya Beej Nigam Ltd., Pant Bhawan, 6th Floor, Bailey Road, Patna 4. N.S.Madhvan, the Agriculture Production Commissioner, Government of Bihar, Agriculture Department, Bihar, Patna 5. Sanjay Chandra, the Company Secretary, Bihar Rajya Beej Nigam Ltd., Pant Bhawan, 6th Floor, Bailey Road, Patna ----------- 2. 07.09.2009 No one appears for the petitioners. The petitioners have approached this Court claiming disobedience of the interim orders dated 8.9.1997 and 4.11.1997 passed by this Court by which this Court had directed that recovery from the salary until further orders may not be made. In the show cause filed on behalf of opposite party nos. 2 to 5, officials of the Bihar State Seed Corporation Ltd., it is stated that there has been no violation of the orders of this Court by the opposite parties at any stage. It is stated that the Corporation has - 2 - merely rectified the fixation of the salary of the petitioners but had made no recovery keeping in view the aforesaid interim orders during the pendency of the writ petition. In the above circumstances no case for initiating contempt proceeding against the opposite parties is made out. The contempt application is accordingly dismissed. S.Pandey (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.)