da‘ed IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATrISGARH AT BILASPUR LCHHATHSGARH) WRIT PETITION (S) No. 342} OF 2006 : ’Emt. F.Tirkey, Wife ofShri Soul PETITIONER Kujur, aged about 52 years, Posted as Lady Health Visitor, in Health Centre, Jondhra, District Bilaspur (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS : /1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). /2. The Under Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). WR‘IT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22/6/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ‘FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MAEDAMUS, CERTIORARI, PROHIBITION ETC. XI—HC-78 WW ~W?NQ'~~339?9% 200g WW (W) WWW§WW mmwm $Wm 7.8.2006:- Shri Bhaskar Payashi, cou for the petitioner. n I Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy G vt. Advocate for the State/respondents on advance copy. Heard. By the instant petition, the petitioner has challenged her transfer order dated 6-7-2006, Annexure . whereby she has been transferred from Heaith Centre, Jondhra, D trict Bilaspur to Community Health Centre, Amoda, DistrictKanker. The main grievance of th petitioner is that she is a low paid employee and she has been tran erred out of the district about 300 km away from the present place of po ting. that too on the complaint of some political persons as they were not in ited in the flag hoisting ceremony. Learned counsel for the peti ‘oner submitted that the petitioner may be allowed to make a representati ’n to the respondent No.1 and he be learned counsel for respondents has h WWW wmé§ni$ ' *‘“—rw directed to decide the same, to wh no objection. Having heard learned cou for the parties, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the ca e and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the r made by learned counsel for the petitioner is just, fair and reasona le. Therefore. the petitioner‘is allowed to make a detailed representation along with a copy of this petition and annexures to the respondent No raising all her grievances within‘a period of 10 days from today and i turn, respondent No.1 shall decide the representation of the petitioner wit in a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of the representation, after onsidering ail the points raised by the petitioner, in accordance with law. P.T.O. - 1 i n l p e . XI—HC-78 HW,WW,W . mam-65m 200 '\ WW(W) 311W ah‘WHm m m mm Hf‘aa’ anéw —£(. ‘ Till then. the effect and opal of the petitioner shall remain stayed With the direction aforesaid, mmefwm aammarsr Ban/e 'ation of the impuéhed order in respect , if the petitioner is not relieved. the petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.3048/2006 also stands disposed of. Parties are entitled for certifie Sd/- d copy of this order. j l L.C. Bhadoo Judge ‘ m