WP(C) 838/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE I.A. ANSARI Heard Mr. MU Mondol, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Mr. BK Sharma, lea rned counsel, for the respondents No.1 to 7. The grievance of the petitioner is, in brief, thus: The petitioners were applicants for appointment to the post of Anganwadi Workers and Helpers in diff erent centers under Agomoni ICDS Project, Dhubri. The petitioners claim that the private respondents, who have been selected as Anganwadi Worker and Helper resp ectively, does not belong to the place, where the Anganwadi Center is located an d the requisite forum for holding the proceedings of the selection Board was imp ermissible in law. As the dispute, raised by the petitioners, are substantially factual in nature, this Court is of the view that in the facts and circumstances of the pre sent case, respondent No.2, namely, Director of Social Welfare, Government of As sam, shall look into the grievances of the petitioners and make enquiry in this regard and, in accordance with the findings of the inquiry, pass appropriate ord er(s). Whatever decision is reached, in this regard, by the respondent No.2 or w hatever order is, ultimately, passed by the respondent No.2, on the petitioners’ grievances, shall be communicated, in writing, to the petitioners and if the pe titioners feel aggrieved by the decision(s), which may be reached, or the order( s), which may be passed by the respondent No.2, the petitioners shall remain at liberty to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. The whole exercise, so directed, shall be completed within a period of t wo months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by the respondent No. 2. The petitioners may furnish to the respondent No.2 a certified copy of this o rder along with a copy of the writ petition and annexures thereto. Furnish a copy of this order to the learned counsel for the respondents.