1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5473 OF 2009 (Bharat Sevakram Tumane vs. The Additional Collector, Nagpur & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DECEMBER 17, 2009. Heard Shri Dhatrak, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Fulzele, learned AGP for respondent No. 1. The contention is, as Respondents No. 3 & 4 never raised dispute about their resignation before the competent forum i.e. Respondent No. 1- Additional Collector, the said respondents have ceased to be members. Shri Fulzele, learned AGP appearing for Respondent No.1 has invited attention to the impugned orders to show that Gram Panchayat itself did not accept those resignations and the proceedings record that the genuineness thereof could not be verified. With the assistance of both counsel, I have perused the papers. The meeting in which the resignations were considered and it has been recorded that the same could not be verified is dated 05.06.2007. Thereafter several meetings of Gram Panchayat have been held and Respondents No. 3 & 4 have participated 2 in those meetings as members of Respondent No. 2 – Gram Panchayat. As their resignations were never accepted, it is apparent that they had no reason to raise any dispute before Respondent No.2 in relation thereto. The application of mind by Respondent No.1 in this respect is, therefore, not erroneous. No case is made out warranting any interference in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.