ssm 1 910.wp.1292.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1292 OF 2011 M/s. Swojas Associates Pvt. Ltd. ....Petitioner Versus Swojas Dhruv Apartments Condominium and others ....Respondents __________ Mr. V. B. Naik i/b Sukand Kulkarni for the Petitioner. Mr. P. S. Dani for the Respondents. CORAM: B. R. GAVAI, J. DATED : 18 TH MARCH, 2011. P.C.: Both the Counsel for the Petitioner as well as the Respondents fairly concede that the order dated 14 th January, 2011 is not sustainable in law. Even otherwise, the view taken by the learned Trial Court is totally erroneous, while the learned District Judge had allowed the application of the Respondents/Plaintiffs for temporary injunction it had also expedited trial. This Court as well as the ssm 2 910.wp.1292.11 Apex Court refused to interfere with the order passed by learned District Judge. In that view of the matter, the finding of the learned District Judge that this Court or the Apex Court has not confirmed the directions of the District Judge for expediting trial is without substance. 2. The impugned order dated 14 th January, 2011 is, therefore, quashed and set aside. 3. The learned Trial Court is now directed to dispose of the suit in any event within a period of six months from today. If necessary, the learned Trial Court may proceed on day to day basis. Needless to state that the learned Trial Court would not give any unwarranted adjournments to any of the parties. (B. R. GAVAI, J.)