1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 1056 OF 2008 Ghanshyam @ Shyam Shripat Sakat .......Appellant versus The State of Maharashtra ........ Respondant. Mr. D.S. Manerkar for the Appellant/applicant Mrs. Usha Kejariwal APP for State. CORAM: S. B. MHASE & R. V. MORE, JJ. DATED: 14th OCTOBER, 2008. P.C.: 1. Admit. S. B. MHASE, J. R. V. MORE, J. 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1127 OF 2008 IN APPEAL NO. 1056 OF 2008 Ghanshyam @ Shyam Shripat Sakat .......Appellant versus The State of Maharashtra ........ Respondant. Mr. D.S. Manerkar for the Appellant/applicant Mrs. Usha Kejariwal APP for State. CORAM: S. B. MHASE & R. V. MORE, JJ. DATED: 14th OCTOBER, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the application for bail. The Appellant is convicted for offence under section 302 of IPC. According to the prosecution when the deceased was sitting in the company of P.ws. 7, 8 and 12 along with others, the accused came at the scene of offence and inflicted injuries on his neck, head and on the hands and sustained injuries. Though the P.W. Nos. 7 and 8 have not supported the prosecution, P.w.no.12 the complainant has supported the prosecution. The evidence of the complainant 3 is convincing one and nothing has turned out in cross examination to discard his credibility. Apart from that the scythe was found stained with blood group of the deceased. So also scythe has been recovered from the suit case under panchamama under section 27. This fact prima facie shows that the conviction is justified. However, since the accused is in jail from the date of arrest, the hearing of the appeal is expedited. Liberty to the applicant/appellant to move for final hearing after preparation of paper book, equally liberty to the applicant/appellant to make private paper book and submit it to the office for expeditious hearing of the appeal. Application no.1127/08 is therefore,rejected. S. B. MHASE, J. R. V. MORE, J.