s-25 * IN THE HIGH COURT + CRL.M.C. 23'3/2OIO PRASOON PATRA & ORS Through versus STATE & ANR Through CORAM: OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA oRDER j 26.07.20tO crl. M.A. Nos. 1267812010 & 1267912010 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. I have examined the compromise deed. A.s Per the compromise deed, an application for quashing of FIR can be filed only after the second motion for divorce is allowed. This petition for quashing of the FIR is, therefore, pre-mature*and is accordingly not entertained. lt is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion whether any such application would be maintainable at a later stage after the second motion is allowed. cRL.M.C. 23s3/2OL0 page 1 of 2 ... Petitioners Mr. Prbshant Mendiratta, Advocate ..... Respondents Ms. Fizani Hussain, APP for the State. '{ a + Crl. M.C. No. 2353|}OLO Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified '/ I At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner no. L, husband, will appear before the trial court on the next date of hearing but the petitioner nos. 2 to 4 may be granted exemption from personal appearance before the trial court' ln view of the fact that the parties have already entered into a compromise, it will be open to the petitioner Nos. 2 to 4 to move an appropriate application before the trial court along with the copy of the compromise deed and request for adjournment to comply with the terms of the compromise and also pray for exemption from personal appearance of petiticner Nos. 2 to 4. Dasti. L' t\ SANJIV KHANNA, J. JULY 26,aOLO Rs/vK! rl. J cRL.M.C. 23s3/2OL0 page2 of 2