IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.7432 of 2010 Date of Decision : April 27, 2010. Jagjiwan Khanna .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Ashish Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is a candidate for the post of Vocational Master. He contends that his name has been erroneously excluded from the list of candidates called for counseling scheduled to be held on 29.4.2010. In this regard, the petitioner is said to have represented the authorities with a representation dated 22.4.2010 (Annexure P-12) but without any response. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, I am of the considered view that the writ petition is pre-mature at this stage and is C.W.P.No .7432 of 2010 2 disposed of accordingly with liberty to the petitioner to pursue his remedy before the Competent Authority who shall consider and redress his grievance as early as possible and preferably within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order, in accordance with law/Rules/Instructions. Dasti. April 27, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE