IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21266 of 2010 MD. IMAMUDDIN, S/o Late Zamiruddin, R/o Village-Gopi Pothia, P.S.- Simraha, District-Araria. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. Mayanannd Mandal, S/o Late Turai Mandal. 3. Sanjeev Mandal, S/o Mayanand Mandal. 4. Tuntun Manda, S/o Mayanand Mandal. 5. Shankar Mandal, S/o Mayand Mandal. 6. Om Prakash Mandal, S/o Late Bhola Manda. All R/o Village-Dhumgarh Pothia, P.S.-Forbesganj, District-Araria. 7. Laxman Mehta, S/o Late Baldev Mahta, R/o Village-Sirsiya, P.S.-Simraha, District-Araria. 8. Badri Mohli. 9. Ganga Mohli. 10. Surendra Mohli. 11. Gukhul Mohli. 12. Amit Mohli. All are R/o Village-Gogi Pothia, P.S.-Simraha, District-Araria. ----------- 02. 04.03.2011 The petitioner is aggrieved with the order dated 24.02.2010 passed by Sessions Judge, Purnia in Cr. Rev. No. 09/82 of 2010 by which he has affirmed the order dated 11.12.2009 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Araria in Complaint Case No. 3578C of 2008 by which no cognizance has been taken under Sections 307 and 384 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act. It has been submitted that in the facts of the case a clear case under Sections 307 and 384 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act is made out and, therefore, order of cognizance is illegal to that extent. The learned Magistrate will consider at the stage of Section 223 Cr.P.C. as to what offence is made out and pass necessary orders. With these observations, the application is disposed off. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)