smug mmi é G) / W\z’a7//l‘- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) w.P.(S) N’o. 600g /2oo9 PETITIONER Ashirwad Rahatgaonkar S/o AxK. Rahatgaonkar, Aged about 33 years, Posted as Sub Inspector, at — Thana Kirandul, Distt. Dantewada (C.G.) W669 WM‘ g; ’k?" , WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE \ K@fw};@a IMANDAMUS/DIRECTION CONSTITUTION OF INDIA OR FOR OTHER ISSUANCE APPROPRIATE OF IWR‘IT WRIT. OR A‘k alf/ , \‘a‘n t II / a VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1) State of Chhattisgarh Through — The Secretary Home D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) J 2) The Inspector General of Police, / (Administration), D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3) i The Superintendent of Police, South Bastar, Dantewada (C.G.) 4) Director General of Police, /, C.G. Govt. Raipur (C.G.) / HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR % %\0&eq WRIT PETITION (S) NO.6004 OF'LZOOQ PETITIONER Ashirwad Rahatgaonkar Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Jitendra Gupta, counsel for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 23rd day of October, 2009) 1) With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the petition is heard finally. 2) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner by order dated 16-9-2009 has been transferred to the Transport Department, but he has not been relieved so far. 3) Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the order passed is still in force and the petitioner cannot be relieved till any other officer is ready to take charge from the petitioner. 4) Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perusing the record, I am of the view that this is for the State Government to pass appropriate order and to see that the other officer is posted where the petitioner was posted. The petitioner cannot be allowed to suffer on account of non—availability of the officer to take charge from the petitioner. Accordingly, the respondents are directed to pass appropriate order and take steps to ensure that the order dated 16-9—2009 is given effect within a period of three Weeks from the date of receipt of this order. 5) In view of the foregoing, the writ petition is disposed of. Sdl- \ Satish K. Agnihotn Midge Gowri \. ...... .