IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6659 of 2009(O&M) Date of Decision : 16.11.2009 Rajinder Kumar etc. ....Petitioners. Versus Sushma Kumari etc. .....Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Ms.Seema Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. * * * SABINA,J.(Oral) Petitioner along with others filed the suit for declaration and permanent injunction. Service on defendant no.5 was effected. Defendant no.5 filed the written statement and also cross-examined the witnesses examined by the plaintiffs and the some of the witnesses examined by the other defendants. Thereafter, none appeared on behalf of the defendant no.5. An application was moved by the petitioner that defendant No.5 be again summoned. Vide the impugned order, the said application was dismissed. Hence, the present revision petition. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners, I am of the opinion that the instant petition is devoid of any merit. A perusal of the impugned order reveals that defendant no.5 was proceeded ex parte vide order dated 27.08.2009. Thereafter, the application was filed that defendant no.5 be again summoned. The learned trial court rightly dismissed the application as it was for defendant no.5 to follow up the case or not after due service. Although defendant no.5 had initially Civil Revision No.6659 of 2009(O&M) ..2.. appeared and filed written statement but thereafter, none had appeared on behalf of defendant no.5. No ground for interference by this court is made out. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. 16th Nov.2009 (SABINA) Seema-II Judge Mediation case No.268 of 2009 in CRM M-6432 of 2009 Present: Mr. B.S.Jaswal Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Monti Ahuja-respondent in person along with his counsel Mr.Puneet Sharma. * * * This matter was amicably settled between the parties on 22.9.2009 and as per the settlement, the petitioner-Balwinder Singh was required to get the plot in question demarcated from the revenue authoritires in the presence of Monti Ahuja-respondent within a period of 20 days commencing from 22.9.2009. Mr.Monti Ahuja informed that Mr.Balwinder Singh has not done anything in this regard and is also not responding to the written communications sent by him to Mr.Balwinder Singh through registered post. Today, Mr.Balwinder Singh has not come present to answer the aforesaid contention of Mr.Monti Ahuja. It appears that Mr.Balwinder Singh is not interested in honouring and complying with the terms and conditions of the settlement dated 22.9.2009. In the circumstances,let the matter be put up before the Hon'ble High Court for further orders. 16.11.2009 (Paul S.Saini) Mediator