IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.23091 of 2011 Date of decision : 13.12.2011 Mahesh Chand and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr. Naveen Daryal, Advocate for the petitioners. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The representation Annexure P-8 is not the reflection of the grievance of the petitioners. The petition is totally vague and does not specify as to how the petitioners claim seniority over and above the private respondents. The petition has also been filed without making an effective demand on the official respondents. In these circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere at this stage, but deem it appropriate to dispose of the instant writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to file a representation making grievance that has been raised in the petition. In case such a representation is made within a period of one month from today, the official respondents shall be obliged to look into it and they would dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four months thereafter. The petitioners in the eventuality of any grievance C.W.P.No.23091 of 2011 -2- subsisting thereafter are at liberty to challenge the decision of the respondents. Petition disposed of. 13.12.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss