INTI-m HIG-I COURT OF QIHA‘ITISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Peuaon NuELEiQxzooa PEITIIONE$ : 1. Yashwant 5ahu, S/o b .L . gcJm &ed am 3’ yml Satpanch, Village Pandmyat Palod, Wkas IQmtd Abhmqmr, Raipur (CG). 2. Anand RamSahu, S/o lham Ram. Aged about 50 yam, ‘ Up-sarpanch, Village Parnhayat Palod, Wkas Hmd Abhmwur, Raipur (CG). Neel Kanth Rah“, S/o Madmlnl, Aged about 28 years, Panch of Village Pmthayat PalOd, \Rkas IQmnd Abhmmur, Raipur (CG). Vezsus- 1. State of Olhathsgarh, Thmugh Secretary Departnmtt Of Pamhayat and Qamin Vikas, Mammlaya, Q'mmri (hawk, Raipur (CG) 2. Joint Emcwr Patmhayat 8: Sang Kalyan Vibhng, Marm‘alaya, RaiPm‘ (CG) f 3. Upper Collectar, Raipur (CG) 4. 81b Hw‘sinnnl Offiaa', (Revemie), Raipur. 5. G‘mshyam Prasad Sal“ 1, S/o Qmnln Prasad Snhn, Aged about 38 yeam, Ex—Patnhayat Karmi of V1llage Patchayat Palod, Vikas IQmnd Abhatwm', Raipur (CG). . 3:::auuuoaoaagaaoaoa. .. . . ... . . . vmn-WwVVn a“. w-vnrw «NV wmwvw‘m w uv $X>fvx : . m “m /< :2 /_ 1 «MNWkM concouccccifo can D\ H H) /.:m_/‘ _ / 1W Wkw u-qa Vzyv 1m,» xmmxx w w» cw nx WxwWVW 1. v mm V _ R111; m FEE 1 R WRIT N IQ ECTION DI OT ER O MATTER. THE JUSTICE 1H TO DO ORDER O MANDAMUS OF R I N E 0 SUANC I FO IND CONSTITU O RTIO C 3533?: 3233.uuuuaaciaaccauu“Eu a3o2u§§§u=§§§§o o 23:2; a ‘ v Petitioners by Shri Pxashant Jayaswal, Advocate with Shm‘ Vinay Pandey, Advocate. State by Shri Ranbir Singh, Heard. The pétitioners' haw mo 226/ 227 of the Constitution of I No. 1 to 4 to immodiatsly conclud Show cause notice within a period In order to invoke the jun': the Constitution of India a petitic fundamental right which has b: Sarpanch, Up-Sarpanch and Pan. this petition they wants that 1% Respondent No.5 as a Panchaya‘ expedited and sought for the xelie be directed to expedite the enquii ‘timdamental rights of the petition: Govt. Advocate. ved this petition under Article ndia for dimcting the respondents e the enquiry in compliance of the of 30 days. ;dic1jon under Article 226/227 of ner has to show his legal right or en infringed. The petitioner's axe :h of the village Panchayat and by Le enquiry instituted against the : Karmi should be directed to be f that the Respondents No. 1 to 4 y. l do not find that any legal or :rs have been infringed, therefore, XI-HC-22 Emmajm,W W m - v . we$\§§\ Wm FL 2003 m WWW WW Mmmm $af-anm 15.11.2003