IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.7292 of 2010 Date of Decision : April 26, 2010. Rajwant Singh and another .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.A.D.S.Ghuman, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners are aggrieved at their transfer orders from D.I.E.T., Guraspur. While the first petitioner has been transferred to Amritsar, the second petitioner has been transferred to Hoshiarpur. It is alleged that the impugned transfer order has been passed for malafide reasons. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and on perusal of the various documents on record, I do not find it a fit case for interference by this Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction. Dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to represent the State Government and/or any other higher authorities, if so, advised, for C.W.P.No .7292 of 2010 2 their posting at nearby place(s). If the petitioners make any such representation, the authority, to whom such representation would be addressed, shall consider and dispose of the same as early as possible and preferably within a period of two months from the date it is received. Dasti. April 26, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE