1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CA NO.9013/2008 in SECOND APPEAL ST. NO. 10984/2007. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 26 th April, 2010. ... 1) Both the Counsel called, absent. 2) Civil Application is moved by the appellant (original plaintiff) to condone the delay of 72 days caused in preferring the Second Appeal, challenging the Judgment and Decree dated 6th August, 1996 in RCS No. 146/1993 recorded by learned II Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ambejogai and also the Judgment and Decree in RCA 170/1996 recorded by the learned District Judge-I, Ambejogai dated 16.1.2007. 3) The official record illustrate, certified copy furnished was defective and consequently it was sent back for correction. Initial delay of 72 days on the part of the appellant is certainly not deliberate. The time was consumed in collecting the certified copies, which was owing to the illness of the 2 applicant and he having suffered an injury to his left hand supported with medical certificate. The delay, being properly explained, condoned on costs of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees one thousand). CA allowed as above. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/ca9013.08