IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 927 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 40 OF 2007 SHREE VAISHNAVI LAND DEVELOPERS REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER MR. VINAYAK MAYEKAR. ... Applicant Versus MS. ALINA LEONILDES TEREZA RODRIGUES FERNANDES AND 13 ORS ... Respondent Shri. Sudin Usgaonkar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, Senior Advocate with Mr. S. Kamat, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 6 and 8 to 14. Coram:- S.B. DESHMUKH & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 23rd December, 2010 P.C.:- We have heard Shri S. Usgoankar, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant and learned Senior Advocate Shri Nadkarni who appears for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 6 and 8 to 14. In the pleadings made in para 3 of this application, it is stated that the legal representatives of the deceased Respondent No.7 are already on record. The prayer is made to delete the name of the Respondent No.7 from the cause title of the Appeal. 2. Mr. Nadkarni, learned Senior Counsel opposes this application. According to him, the Appeal stands abated. Learned Counsel for the Applicant seeks deletion of the name of Respondent no.7 on two grounds. According to him, the legal heirs of Respondent no.7 are already on record and secondly he is seeking deletion at the risk of the Applicant. The issue raised by the learned Senior Counsel Shri Nadkarni, we are keeping it open at the risk of the Applicant and we are permitting the Applicant to delete the name of the Respondent No.7 from the cause title of the Appeal. Misc. Civil Application is accordingly allowed in terms of the prayer clause made in the application. Necessary amendment to be carried out on or before the adjourned date. The application is accordingly allowed and disposed of. Stand over to 24th January, 2011. S.B. DESHMUKH, J. F. M. REIS, J. at*