1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 4488 of 2010. Date of decision: 2.8.2010 Parkash Chand ….. Petitioner. Vs. State of H.P. and others …. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Dhiman , Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. R.K.Sharma, Sr. Additional Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- (a) A writ in the nature of mandamus may be issued and respondents may kindly be directed to transfer the petitioner in one of his choice of stations as mentioned in para-5 of the petition. (b) A writ in the nature of mandamus may be issued and thereby directing the respondent not to relieve the petitioner after his transfer order. It is seen that the petitioner has already submitted representation Annexure P-1 before the respondent which is still pending. There will be a direction to the respondent to look into the 2 representation Annexure P-1, adverting to the submissions made therein and take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date of production of copy of the judgment alongwith copy of writ petition by the petitioner. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Copy dasti (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice August 2, 2010 (Justice Kuldip Singh), Judge. (sks/grs)