HIGVH‘COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 1g /{gé\ WRIT PETITION No 1855 of2003 Subhama Amuman Islamla Through 1ts Secretary Shn KGAnsan, Advocate All Akbar Khan Call’s Block, Shahid Kshfaqullah Khan Ward Juni Line, Opp. Mission Hospitai Bilaspur (C G ) PETITIONER : VERSUS T ESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhamsgarh Through Secretary Deptt ofCommerme & Industnes Ralpur 2 Reglsuar Fnms & Somehes Raupur (C G ) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB Hon’ble Sim Saash K. Agnihotri, J. / w K Present: Shn Vlmlesh Bagm Advocate for the petmoner I Shn AS Kachhwaha, Deputy Advocaie Generai for the State/respondents ORAL ORDER (Passed on 06a; day of November, 2008) With the consent ofthe parties, the matter is taken up for hearing fmalky. 2. The instant petition impugls the letter dated 03.01.2003 (Annexure P/2) issued by the respondent No. 1, whereby the order dated 02.03.2002 has been communicated to the petitioner-society. The petitioner does not challenge the legality and validity of the order passed by the Minister, but the communication. The order dated 01.01.2003 was passed by the Ministerdn-charge in appeal, directing the petitioner to cooperate with the enquiry pending against the petitioner under section 32(1) of the Cooperative Societies Regiskation Act, 1973. 3. I do not Iind any reason asto why, at this stage, this Court should interfere with the enquiry proceedings. The submission of the petitioner that the enquiry has been initiated on the allegations which have already been r/ considered earlier, cannot be examined by this Court. It is better that the enquiry conducted by the enquiry officer/Assistant Reg'strar, Firms and Societies, Bilaspuri be completed after aifording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 4. On perusal of Annexure R/3, tiled by the respondents alongwith the return, it appears that the petitioner is not cooperating with the enquiry. Accordingly, the petitioner may cooperate with the authorities to complete the pending enquiry. The enquiry may be (concluded as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period ofthree months. In View of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/— Sansh K Agmhotn Judge \ 3,} R