IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Civil Revision No.1678 of 2009 Decided on : March 26, 2009 Satpal Singh ... Petitioner VERSUS Harbhajan Singh ... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Navjeet Sodhi, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N.JINDAL, J.- Having scrutinised the impugned order dated 15.1.2003, it is revealed that the defendant – respondent has admitted tenancy of the plaintiff – petitioner, yet he has set up the counter-claim for ejectment of the shop on the ground that he has already issued notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act on 25.9.2006. In the circumstances, the Trial Court has taken a correct view while observing that the counter-claim is to be decided in the pending suit. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. March 26, 2009 ( A.N.JINDAL ) `gian' JUDGE