IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 8340 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: January 12, 2011 Sushma Goel .. Petitioner Vs. Neelam Arora and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. C.B. Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N. Jindal, J (Oral) The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 10.12.2010 passed by the Civil Judge, Panchkula and allowing her to lead additional evidence. Heard. In view of the observations made by the trial court in the order dated 30.11.2010 that the court had wrongly issued the summons to the Registry Clerk of the Tehsil Officer, Panchkula, whereas, the summoned record was available in the office of S.D.M. Kalka, this petition needs to be accepted at this initial stage and one opportunity is required to be given to the petitioner subject to costs of Rs.2000/- with a direction that the petitioner would take dasti summons of the Clerk of the Office of S.D.M. Kalka to prove the notice dated 15.7.2002 allegedly issued by the Tehsildar, Kalka. Ordered accordingly. This petition is disposed of without issuing notice to the respondents with a view to impart complete justice to the parties and to save the huge expenses, which may be incurred by the respondents as also in order to avoid unnecessary delay in adjudication of the matter. Still, if dissatisfied, the respondents may move to this court for recalling this order. January 12, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge