s~ 1:"%KS© (^) BIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 34 of 2002 Petitioner Rohit Mirre S/o GhumaRam, Aged 35 years, R/o Aurada, Via- Kodataria, Tah-Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh, Working as Revenue Sub- Inspector, Municipai Counci!, Raigarh Versus Respondents 2 3 State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Urban Administration and Deveiopment Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur. Coliector, Raigarh. Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Council, Raigarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri Shri !.S. Sahu, Advocate for ths petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the respondents No. 1 and 2/State. ORDER (Passed on thss 21st day ofJune,2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that with the passage oftime, this petition has become infructuous. 2. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. B/- Sd/- satishK.,Agnihotri Judge