W IN THE HIGH GOURT OF 6HHAWI$GARH NON-APPLICANTS: JV (1)“, State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, department ofPublic Works Department, Raipur (C.G.) (g) Executive Engineer, Public Works Department (B/R) ”w Korba(CG) (3) Sub Dlvmonal Officer Public Works Department (B/R) M“ Sub Dmsmn Bha1sma dlstnct Korba (C G) y N APPLICATION FOR%ESTORATION OF WRIT N“ PETITION DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSEDUTION ON 6 11 2009 AT: BILA$PUR mwgmwwmgg WW “%‘%w.‘ w w.\P. (S1No. 6§§b OF 2009 i? APPLICANT: v _ Chait Ram, aged 3O years, son of late Mukhi Ram h Kanwar (Rathiya), resfident of village & post office Kotmer, P.S. & tahsil Kartala, di§11ict Korba (C.G.) VERSUS w \‘w’ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTBGARH : EILASPUR M.C.(3. N0. 506 of 2009 Agm iicant Chaii Ram Versu$ Respondent5 Staie of Chhattisgarh and others (Appiication far restoration of W.P.($)No.8390/2009) Emgie Bench: Hon’bie $hri Satish K. Agnihmri, J. Present: - Shri Somnath Verma, counse) for the appiicant 3m P. K‘ Bhaduri, Pane! Lawyer for the State: OR§L ORDER (Passed on thig 23m day of Nov&mber, 200$) Learned counsei appearing for the appiicant submits that the ceunsel for the applicant could not appear on account of bonafide mistake, fherefore, W‘P‘(S.)No.63QO/2009, which was dismissed on 06-1 14/3009, may be restored to its file. (2) Reasonable and sufficient cause has been shown. W.P.(8) No.6390/2009 is restored to the originai fiie. subject io payment of cost of Rs.500/-, to the High Court Legal Aid Commii‘tee. (3) ih View of the above, the Mi C.C. is aiiowed. A copy of this order be piaced on the recorci of originai petition and the same be iisted for hearing. Sd/— Satish K. Agniiaotri Judge