HEGH CijURT {)F (E'HHA'YE‘ESGARE AT BILASPUR WRKT PETITIQN {S} N6. 71§4 (£29m ‘ Dr. G.R.Chamrvedi 8X0 Bodhe La} Chamrvedi, agsd about 47 years, Gccupation ~ Leetui‘er, PQSteci at Govt. Ayurved Coilege, Raipur, Ric. — Qt. No. (3/6; Ayurved College Colony, Raipur? Disix‘ict Raijaur (03.) PETIT1()NERS ‘2. Dr. G.R.Ratrey S/o Late Motiiai may, ageti ahcmt 42 years. Occupation ~ Lectarer. Posted M. Govit. Ayurved College, Raipur, R/0 Q. N0. G/7’, Ayurveci ‘ College Ceiony, Raipur. District ~ Raipur (C.G.) z VERSUS ‘ . State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secreiary. i’ubh'c Heaith. Family Weifare & Meéiciixe Ec‘iucaiim'l, Dspmtment, D.K.S. Bhawan. Ra§pur, Distriat — Raipur (€.G.} RESPONDENTS- 2., The Direcior, Bhartiya Chikétsa 1’adhati Avam Hmneopathy, Clmattisgarh, Raip‘ur, Districi ~ Raipur ' 11 (C.G.) 3. The Pmzcipal, Govt. Aywved Coiiegs, Raipur, District — Raipur (CG) WRIT ‘EETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE €ONSTETUTKON OF INDXA SB: Hon’hle Shri Satish K. An,ni'h0triz J. V Present: Shli P.K.Paiel, Advocate for the petitioners. Sim. Binu Sharma, Panel Lawyer fer the State. GRAL ORDER {Pagsed on 23‘3 day of §atzuary, 20!}8) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioriexs sseaks permissioa of this Comt to wéthdraw tins petitioo with liberty to file represeotétim before the concerned authoritiesa, to which learned counsel appearmg for the State has no objeetion. 2. 1t is ordered accotféingly. In the event, a representation is made by the petitioners. the respondent authorities shall consider and deeioe the representatiohs in accordance with law. as expeditiousiy as possible. preferab1y wxthm a perioti of one month §rom the date ofreceipt ofthe representation. 3. Accouiingly. the petition is dismissed aS withdrawn with the above etated iiioeriy. Sdl— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge i