IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 22ND OCTOBER 2009 / 30TH ASWINA 1931 CRP.No. 625 of 2005(B) --------------------------------- CF.NO.9183/2004 OF MUNSIFF'S COURT,VARKALA. .................... REVN. PETITIONER/PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF: --------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ARIFA BEEVI, D/O.SAINABA BEEVI, KALIYIL PURA VEEDU, EDAVA DESOM, VARKALA VILLAGE. 2. SAIFUNISA, D/O.SAINABA BEEVI, KALIYIL PURA VEEDU, EDAVA DESOM, VARKALA VILLAGE. 3. SALIM, S/O.MEERASAHIB, KALIYILPURA VEEDU, EDAVA DESOM, VARKALA VILLAGE. 4. ASIYA UMMAL, D/O.KHADEEJA UMMAL, KALIYILPURA VEEDU, EDAVA DESOM, VARKALA VILLAGE. 5. ALI AKBAR, S/O.KHADEEJA UMMAL, KALIYILPURA VEEDU, EDAVA DESOM, VARKALA VILLAGE. BY ADVS. MR.R.ANILKUMAR, MR.P.BANI. RESPONDENTS/ DEFENDANTS: ---------------------------------------------- 1. FAIZAL SALAHUDEEN, S/O.SALAHUDEEN, NOW RESIDING AT KUWAIT PROTIEN CO., POST BOX NO.26332, SAFAT-13124, KUWAIT FROM KALIYILPURAM, SAMEERA MANZIL, EDAVA DESOM & VILLAGE. C.R.P. NO.625/2005-B: 2. OMANA FAIZAL, D/O.MUHAMMADALI, NOW RESIDING AT KUWAIT PROTIENS CO., POST BOX NO.26332, SAFAT-13124, KUWAIT FROM PALATHODI VEEDU, SREEYAT, EDAVA DESOM & VILLAGE. 3. MUHAMMADALI, S/O.MUHAMMED KUNJU, PALATHODI VEEDU, SREEYAT, EDAVA DESOM AND VILLAGE. 4. JAMEELA BEEVI, D/O.RAHUMA BEEVI, RASEENA MANZIL, VENKULAM DESOM, EDAVA VILLAGE. 5. SELIN, D/O.JAMEELA BEEVI, RASEENA MANZIL, VENKULAM DESOM, EDAVA. 6. RASEENA, D/O.JAMEELA BEEVI, RASEENA MANZIL, VENKULAM DESOM, EDAVA VILLAGE. 7. SHAHIDA, D/O.JAMEELA BEEVI, RASEENA MANZIL, VENKULAM DESOM, EDAVA VILLAGE. 8. ARUMAKUNJU, W/O.IBRAHIMKUTTY, PANICHAKUZHY VEEDU, EDAVA DESOM AND VILLAGE. 9. RAMEESA, D/O.IBRAHIMKUTTY, PANICHAKUZHY VEEDU, EDAVA DESOM & VILLAGE. 10. RASEENA, D/O.IBRAHIMKUTTY, PANICHAKUZHY VEEDU, EDAVA DESOM & VILLAGE. 11. MUHAMMED BASHEER, S/O.MEERASAHIB, KALIYILPURA VEEDU, EDAVA DESOM AND VILLAGE. R1 TO R3 BY ADV. MR.VINOD RAVINDRANATH. THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: prv. S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ----------------------------- C.R.P.No.625 OF 2005 -------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of October 2009 ------------------------------------- ORDER Revision is directed against an order passed by the learned Munsiff, Varkala returning a plaint presented by the petitioner holding that the court has no pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain the suit. The impugned order shows that some enquiry was conducted by the court by appointing a commissioner to determine the value of the suit property and thereafter the court formed the conclusion that the market value of the property and valuation thereof for the purpose of jurisdiction is beyond that of the court. Relief claimed in the suit was one for cancellation of a document. Whatever that be, the plaintiff is having an alternate efficacious remedy to challenge the order by way of filing an appeal under Order 43 C.R.P.No.625 OF 2009 Page numbers Rule 1(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure. It is open to the petitioner to canvass before the court to which appeal, if any, is preferred for exemption of the time during which the revision was prosecuted before the court under Section 14 of the Limitation Act. If any such request is made, the court below shall consider it and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Reserving the right of the petitioner to challenge the order by way of an appeal as provided by law, the revision is closed. Sd/- S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE vdv