1 AO-982-10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 982 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1193 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLN. (STAMP) NO. 17663 OF 2011 Pandurang Narayan Deshmukh & Ors. ... Appellants (Og.Defendants) vs. M/s. Neel Properties & Anr. ... Respondents (No.1 - org. plaintiff No.2 - org. Deft. No.5) Ms. Gauri Godse,Advocate, for the appellants CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 2nd August, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the appellants, who are the original defendants. 2. It appears that the appellants are entitled to get some developed land from CIDCO under a Scheme known as 12.5% Scheme. According to the respondent/plaintiff, the defendants had entered into an agreement with them for development of the land whenever it would be allotted by CIDCO and a part of 2 AO-982-10.sxw consideration amount was also paid. The plaintiff filed the suit for specific performance of the contract and for injunction restraining the defendants from terminating the contract. On the application for temporary injunction, the trial Court restrained the defendants/appellants from creating third party interest in the property pending the suit. That order is challenged in the present appeal. 3. After hearing the learned Counsel for the appellants and the reasons given by the trial Court, I find no valid reason to interfere. 4. Therefore, the Appeal and the application stand dismissed. However, the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Panvel, shall expedite the hearing and dispose of Special Civil Suit No.8 of 2009 as early as possible, and in any case, by the end of December 2012. 5. As the Appeal itself is disposed of, the Civil Application (Stamp) No. 17663/2011 does not survive and stands disposed of accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)