- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.378 OF 2004 REVISION APPLICATION NO.378 OF 2004 REVISION APPLICATION NO.378 OF 2004 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Mr.Prataprao J. Shinde for the Applicant Ms M.H.Mhatre,A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : OCTOBER 13,2005 : OCTOBER 13,2005 : OCTOBER 13,2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Shri Shinde for the Applicant. The challenge is to the Judgment and Order passed by the learned Trial Judge by which the accused persons have been acquitted of the offences under Sections 504, 323 read with Section 34 of the Indian penal Code. Perusal of the impugned Judgment and Order shows that oral and documentary evidence has been appreciated by the learned Magistrate. He has noted that three witnesses have turned hostile. 2. It is not permissible to re-appreciate the evidence inthe Revision Application under Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. There is no merit in the Revision Application and the same is rejected. - 2 - JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE