IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** C.W.P. No.22341 of 2011 Date of Decision:02.12.2011 Chetna and others .....Petitioners Vs. The Punjab School Education Board and another .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. Arvinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed for quashing of the process followed by the respondent- Board in conducting written test on 16.10.2011 in pursuance to advertisement dated 18.6.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioners has challenged the process of selection on the ground that the date of written test was published only in one newspaper and because of that reason, so many candidates could not appear. The candidates, who have applied in pursuance to the advertisement should have been informed by post, which is a general procedure and the same is to be adopted in such like cases. A very short period was given after publication of the advertisement asking the candidates to appear in the written test and the petitioner as well as other similarly situated candidates were not aware and could not appear in the written test. Heard the argument of learned counsel for the petitioners. Admittedly, written test has been held and selection has not been finalised so far but all formalities of selection have been completed. Neither there is mention in the advertisement that the candidates who have applied in pursuance of the advertisement were to be informed through post nor counsel for the petitioners has shown any such rule in support of his argument that the communications should have been there. Information was published in the local newspaper and the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner do not have any merit and the petition is dismissed. Dismissed. December 02, 2011 ( DAYA CHAUDHARY ) renu JUDGE