IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2899 of 2010 TAPESHWAR PRASAD S/O LATE AMBIKA PRASAD AT PRESENT RESIDING AT MOHALLA- RAM LAKHAN SINGH PATH, BISHNUPURI, CHITKOHRA, P.S.- GARDANIBAGH, TOWN & DISTT.- PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR, INDUSTRY DEPTT., BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE BIHAR STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION THROUGH IT'S MANAGING DIRECTOR, INDIRA BHAWAN, PATNA- 800 001 4. THE BIHAR PAPER MILLS THROUGH ITS PROJECT OFFICER, BAIDNATHPUR, SAHARSA ----------- 2 19.02.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State and the respondent-Corporation. Petitioner claims to have been appointed under the respondent-Corporation as Accounts Assistant, however he was sent on deputation to the department of Industry, Govt. of Bihar for the period 28th February, 1993 to 31st July, 2006 as would be evident from the perusal of the letter no. 334/G dated 31st July, 2009 written by the Chief Personal Officer of the respondent- Corporation to the Principal Secretary, Department of Industry, Govt. of Bihar, however the petitioner has not been paid the gratuity as also the amount equivalent to the unutilized leave (earned leave) besides some other dues as highlighted in this writ application. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Corporation submits that for the period the petitioner was on deputation with the State Government, the gratuity and other admissible dues are payable by the State Government and for that the Corporation has written the aforesaid letter as contained in Annexure-1. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner had represented the matter on 19.08.2009, however, for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.2 with a copy to the respondent no.3. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider each of the claims raised by the petitioner in his representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and necessary orders could also be passed for the payment of admitted dues. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)