IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.3178 of 1985 Date of decision :- July 08, 2011 Lachhi Ram .... Appellant Versus Sohan Lal and others ... Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present:- Ms. Alka Sarin, Advocate, for the appellant Mr. Kashmir Singh, Advocate, for the respondents Gurdev Singh, J Heard. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the respondents that he has received a letter from daughter-in-law of respondent No. 3(since deceased) that the shop in dispute had since been purchased by Sant Ram- respondent No. 3 from Lachhi Ram-plaintiff-appellant and as such the appeal has become infructuous and be dismissed as such. He has placed on record the said letter. In view of that statement of the counsel for the respondents, it has been stated by the learned counsel for the appellant that she has no objection if the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous without prejudice to the rights of the appellant to get the same revived in case, it is found that the shop in dispute has not been purchased by Sant Ram- respondent No. 3. Dismissed as having become infructuous with the said liberty. Records of the trial court be returned forthwith. (Gurdev Singh) Judge July 08, 2011 paramjit