1 CWP 10666/09 In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench, Jaipur. ** Civil Writ Petition No. 10666/2009 Kailash Chand Agarwal Versus The District and Sessions Judge, Jaipur City, Jaipur. Date of Order ::: 07/09/2009 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, for petitioner. Instant petition has been filed against the order Annexure-5 dated 25/05/2009 whereby the petitioner has been compulsorily retired in exercise of powers under Rule 53(1) of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1996. In regard to the matters of compulsory retirement, remedy is available under Rule 35 of the Rajasthan Subordinate Courts Ministerial Establishment Rules, 1986. Remedy has been provided to the employee of submitting representation but it is nothing but an appeal under Rule 35 of the Rules of 1986. Counsel submits that petitioner has filed representation against the order of compulsory retirement before the authority, which has not been decided so far. In view of the alternative remedy available to the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to exercise its extra ordinary jurisdiction 2 CWP 10666/09 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, however, considers it appropriate to direct the petitioner to pursue the remedy available to him and it is expected from the authority to decide the representation on merits in accordance with law expeditiously. The petition stands disposed of with liberty as referred above. (Ajay Rastogi), J. Raghu/p.2/ 10666CW09-Spt07.doc