1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 928 OF 2008 Kalyanrao Wategaonkar ...Petitioner VERSUS Smt. Kanchanmala and others ...Respondents ..... Shri P.G.Godhamgaonkar, advocate for the petitioner Smt. M.B.Gangwal for respondent no.1 Shri S.D.Kaldate, A.P.P. for respondent nos. 2 and 3. ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : 13 th August, 2010 PER COURT : 1 Heard respective learned counsel for the parties. 2 Pursuant to the order dated 9.8.2010, Shri S.D.Kaldate, learned A.P.P. for respondent nos. 2 and 3 filed the report dated 9.8.2010 from the investigating agency and same is taken on record and marked as document ‘X’. Para no.3 of the said report discloses that no sufficient evidence is available against accused no.5, namely K.D.Wategaonkar (B.D.O.) i.e. the petitioner herein to file the chargesheet against him, and therefore, necessary arrangement has been made to delete his name from the offence. 3 In view of the very contents of report dated 9.8.2010 2 document ‘X’, nothing survives in the present petition and same stands disposed of. 4 Rule is made absolute accordingly. 5 It is reported that Smt. Gangwal, learned counsel was appointed through legal aid to represent respondent no.1, and therefore, her fees are quantified at Rs.2,000/- to be paid by Legal Aid Committee. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE), JUDGE. dbm/crwp928.08