IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1221 of 2007 KRISHNA SAH @ SAGATU SAH S/O LATE RAMJI SAH --- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SAARASWTI DEVI W/O KRISHNA SAH @ LAGATU SAH --- OPP. PARTIES. For the Petitioner : Mr. Satyndra Narayan Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, APP For the Opp.Party no.2: Mrs. Poonam Kumari, Advocate. ----------- 05 30.08.2010 Heard. Petitioner is husband who is aggrieved by the order passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Siwan in Misc. case no. 73 of 2003, whereby on a consideration of the materials placed before him, it has been found that the wife/ applicant has been neglected and that she had no sufficient means to support her whereas the husband/petitioner herein had some earnings from house rent as well as the business (vending of Bhunja), and accordingly a sum of Rs. 700/- (Seven hundred) has been fixed as maintenance payable with effect from the date of the order. It appears that witnesses were examined on behalf of the applicant/wife. Husband(petitioner) appeared and filed rejoinder and thereafter did not participate in the proceeding inasmuch as no cross-examination was made on behalf of the husband( petitioner) I have carefully perused the findings of the learned Court below culled out in paragraph no. 11. In my considered view, learned Trial Judge has taken a reasonable view in the matter which do not call for any interference. The application is dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)