IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-14449 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 17, 2010 Seema Rani and another .....Petitioners v. State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Parties in person with Mr.Vishal Gupta, Advocate. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of direction to respondent nos.1 to 3 to provide security to the petitioners and for protection of their life and liberty at the hands of respondent nos.4 and 5. Mr.Harmanjit Singh Jugait, Advocate, who is present in Court, puts in appearance for respondent no.5 and states that respondent no.4 has already expired. It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that name of respondent no.4 has been typed inadvertently and his name may be deleted from the array of parties. Request is allowed. Name of respondent no.4 is ordered to be deleted from the array of parties. Registry is directed to make the necessary correction in memo of parties. Petitioners have filed this petition without approaching respondent no.2, i.e., Senior Superintendent of Police, Ferozepur, for the relief claimed in this petition. Disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach respondent no.2, i.e., Senior Superintendent of Police, Ferozepur, for the relief claimed in this petition. 17.5.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge