IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1580 OF 2006 (MS) Leela Singh …………..Petitioner. Versus Chairman, Uttaranchal Power Corporation Limited and another. ………Respondents. Mr. B.D. Upadhyay, Advocate for respondents. 17th July, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. List revised. Case called out twice. None appears for the petitioner. Petitioner is a consumer of Uttaranchal Power Corporation Limited. Since, there was a dispute of bill charged by the Uttaranchal Power Corporation, the petitioner moved an application before the Consumers Grievance Redressal Forum, Kumaon Zone, Haldwani (Camp Kashipur). The Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum vide its order dated 29th May, 2006 rejected the application of the petitioner. Against the said order of the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum, the petitioner has straightway filed this writ petition. Admittedly, there is an alternative remedy available to the petitioner of filing a representation before the Ombudsman, which is presently functioning in the State of Uttarakhand. This being the admitted position of law, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy and is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. Interim order, if any, is also vacated. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 17.7.2009 Rathour