IN THE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR WRFT PETTTION (227) N0. 757/^ OF 2010 PEnnONER Bharat Prasad Sharma, S/o. Late Shri 6aya Prasad, Sharma, aged about 63 years. R/o. Qrt. no. 1/C. . Street - 1/A, Sector- 8, Bhilainagar,Tahsit& Distt-. t)urg. VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. ^- ^•" »s>'5'' ^I^ 4"^y ;.-^ •\-?-- 2. 1. C.hairman-cum-Managing Director, Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd..H.O. at P-34A, 6anyahat Road, Kolkata, 700 031 (WB). Hindustan Steel Works Construct-ion Ltd., Bhilai, Through: ©eneral Manager, HSCL, Tahsil & Distl-. Durg. (C.G.) 3. Estate Officer, Bhilai Steel Plant, Bhilai, 13t floor, Town Administration Buitding, Indira _Palace, Bhilai Nagar, Distt-. Durg. ' (C.6.) WRIT PETETtON UN&ER ARTECLE 227 OF THE CONSTIWTtON OF IN&IA PARTtCULARS OFTHE PETCTEONERS: As stated in the cause title above. fl -it •^i N^^^ -f.v HIG^CQlJRTOT'CHHA'rTISGiARHATBHdkSPlJR 8.B: Hd^ S»alPrastoa^ISumarM^^ ^WitPetiti<m(221nNo.'7S<Cy2(l(t<» PETmONER i BluratFtasadSharma Versus : KESPONDENTS : €Iurinna <imi-Manasn»e 'eetor. Hindustan Steel Wortes C<mstn ti<m Etd. . : : - :/-:'::il. :: /1 •:; ^ ^bwafasaee^ •..••-:• : •:: ; • ' . Shri Shashaiik Tfaalair, counsd for the prtitioner. WRH'PE^ITIQNlINDERAa'riCLEMTOFTHE T~::::eONS1tTFtrtK)NW'iIN]OlA'! :'::"; : ' • ORALORDER (16.12.2010) Admittedly petitkaiCT's ^ppeal Uefere District Judge, Du% challeaging the order passed by the EstrteOfBcer, Bbilai Sted Plaut, Bhilaion 27/07/2007 ispenduig consideratioB. In Ifae said iypwl tiie petitkmermovedapplumtioDseekmgaduectiOntotherespondeiitto produce documente wliieh, aceordingto^he petittOneT, havea bearing :~\ cmtheissueregaaxlmgniamtairiabilityoffheproe^dhigsinitiatsdtey thfi Esbte Officer. (2) Leamed counsel woukl submit tiiat Ihe applicatfon was pending for about tfaree years aad the respondmt tdwayssought time to file reply to tiie application, liowever on &e date wliea tiie impupied order was {assed the respondeafs eoBBset iafbnBed the ccmrtthathedoesncrtvrisbtofileanyTeplytothe^ipliea^^ shall opposetfle same atffiffitiane offiiulheaiing oftiie appeal. y. •--.•'• .' • .'" • • ' ' ;• :'. .;.'••' •/". •• • '.; (3) K islfae submisskm ofleatned courisel for &e appeUant^at if ,the appeat is heard without productKm of docuarent, h« AaB be :ii"sfea*»,' y'if""^ f fi?;^'X .^1^,1 :'""BI 'i l]y:^^?i^, •^^SSS^ ^ prejudieed, in as much as the dcwimient whiA is exclusavely in possession oftite respoadent has beea widiheld by tiie respondeat to take advantageina^eal. (4) In the opinion oflhts eourt, tii& impugned wder tias turt deci<tedanyrightoftiiepifffiesandthusBeintetfei®neeunderArticle 227 ctfthe Constitution ofltidia is called fbr. (5) At fhis st^e leamed couasd ferAe petitioueT would siAmit that he has already moved an aiylicatioa brfore the Public Infonnarion OfBcer of tiie respondent Bhilai Steel Plant seeking copies offhe document under R^ht to Infimnation and the san is Ukely to take some time, therefore he may be granted Uberty as well as opportunity to produce ttis document at Ihetime of Saal hearing oflliearo'eal. (6) Gonsideringtiie to^ityoftiie cireumstances, tt is duected titat thfi learned District Judge shaU grant aifBGient oppoituaity to Ifae petitionertoproducetfierelevantdociuaentaiq)Kedforbyhimunder Right to InfOTination Act, howevCT tti®same shall be done by Ifae petitioner mthin a period ofsix weeksfi-om today. (7) Learaed Distriet Jud^ is- esqieGted to fix a date fbrfinal hearingQf^pendingappealinunedteelyaftCT^xweAs. (8) WiA the abc^ observation, the mstant petitioa under^^^A^ 227 ofthe Coastitutku ofIndiaisdisnMssed. sdlL^^rfa tl^tf»at! v^^^f^ _^-