HIéH CQURT OF CHHATTISQARH AT BILA5PUR Misc.Appeal Ne.1299 of 2005 CQRAN‘x‘. Hon’bie Shri SR. Ngyuk, C3 /& Hm'bie Shri Diiip Raesaheb Deshmukhvl @peHanf Maherldm Singh Thakur 5/0 lam Arjun Singh Thakur,’ aged abouf 4O years] by casfe Kshyafriya‘ Occupaffon-Service (Lecfur'er) R/o Civil Lines,.Rai9arh, Tahsil and Dis'rr'xcf Raigarh (Chhmfisgar‘h) Versus Respondems Chini Lal Harvangh 5/0 Tulur‘gm Harvansh, Occupa‘rion—Driver', R/o Punjipufhum, Ruigomh, Soinik Trunspor+ Punjupa'rham, Tahsil Gharghom, Dis‘m’c’r Raigarh (6.6.) 2. [W’s §aigarh 5ainik Transport, Pun‘jupafham, Raigurh, Tahsil &hcrghode, DisTricT Raigarh (C.6.) 3. The New India insurance Company Limi'md, 4 Liyanca Renpa Calcu'Ha, Through—Branch'Managar, The New India Insuranm Company, Raigarh, Tahsf! and DESTricT Raigarh (CG) 5l1r-i Sanfosh Kumar Tiwari, Counsel for fhe appaHanf. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 10% January 2006) The 'foilowin‘g oml arder of fhe Caurf‘was passed by DILIP RAOSAHEB DESHMUKH. J. In ?his appeal in a persona! injury case, The appellanT has assailea The arder‘ da‘I’ed 19.72005 of The Tribunal on Th‘e ground fha’r ihe campensa'rion awarded is on fhe iower side and needs ’ro be eni’ianced. The learned caunsel for The appellanT has admiTTed ThaT no pehmanenT disabilify cerTificaTe Was filed A perusal of The award *-L\ @ -2: pa5$ad by fhe Tribum! also ghows 'rha'r fhe appellanf had suffered fracwr‘e %n The Tibia and ¥ibukx bone of The ief‘f leg‘ However, 56mg The appeilam was serving as Iecfurer, affer The fracmr'e he resumed his mrmal dufies as such. Thare is no per’manem disabih‘ry suffared by fhe appeikm‘t. 2’ in View of The above and affer going ihraugh ihe award pa$szd by The learned Claims Tribunal, in eur considered opinion, The award does nai call for any inierfamnce. l l r l l l i l 3. Tha appeal ig di$missed. Sdl- Sd/ , '/Dilip Raosahel; Chief JusticeJ Deshmukh Judge