IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11062 of 2006 SURESH SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 5 26.10.2009 KHAN Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 8.2.2006 passed by the Collector cum District Supply Officer, Saran at Chapra in Supply Appeal No.71 of 1992, contained in Annexure-1, as well as the order dated 6.8.1992 passed by the Subdivisional Officer, Saran at Chapra. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order canceling his licence was passed without giving a show cause as provided under clause 11 of the Bihar Trade Articles (Licenses Unification) Order, 1984. He further submits that it would appear from the appellate authority that despite various orders the record was not sent to the appellate court. The State files a counter affidavit stating that petitioner committed grave illegalities. In view of the specific assertion that the order canceling the licence were passed without giving a show cause to the petitioner and as such the impugned order dated 6.8.1992 passed by the Subdivisional Officer, Saran at Chapra as well as order dated 8.2.2006 passed by the Collector cum District Supply Officer, Saran at Chapra in Supply Appeal No.71 of 1992, contained in Annexure-1 are set aside. The matter is remitted back to the S.D.O., Saran at Chapra for passing afresh order after giving show cause within a reasonable time in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. (S.P.Singh,J) - 2 -