/ * IN THE HIGH C CURT ( KARNATAKA AT BNGALORE DATED THIS THE 8TH D.Y CF JUNE 1998 BEFE THE HcWBLE r:.JUSTICE CHkNDRASHEKARAIAH IT WNO, 43786 OF 1995 LB BEIWEEN: A, Bhaskara, S/c late H.Annappa, Aged about 38 years, R/o Dhanalaxmi Milaya, Door No, 73 Bhasthjhallj, Halebeedu, Belur Taluk, Hasean District. Petitioner, ( Sri. Ravi’aii. Kumar, Mv,, for petr.) AND: 1. T..e State of Karnataka represented r ts Secretarr. Deoartment of rural Develnent & Panchayat Raj, M,S .Building, Dr. B.R,Ambedkar Read, Bangalore—1, 2— 2. Assistant ConissIner, Sakaleshpu’-a Sub-Division, Sakaleshpura, Hassan District. 3. Halebeedu Vii 1aq Panchavat, represented by its Secretary, Ha1ebedu, Belur Tluk, Hassan District. 4. Union of India, represented by Superintering Archeologist, Banqalore qircie, (i L India, ndriya sadan, 5th floor, F’ Wing, Koramangla, nga1ore 560034. C Aened by the direction of Court o der dt, 1—3—9f, ) R r(k (By Sri. Ashok !ranahal1i , Adv., for PA, & Sri, K.garaja, G? for RI & 2, ) Writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India with an affidavit praying to, quash vide Ann,A, dated 1l1295e & Etc., Writ petition caning on for final disposal, this day the court made the following;— ORDER The petitic ner has challenged the order passed by the 2nd respondent— Assistant Commissioner, Sakleshpur, sta’iing the grant of licence in favour of him until further orders, After the impugned onder, no steps are taken by the Assistant Ccissioner to pass a final order. Therefore, instead of considering this petition on merits, it is just and necessaw to direct the 2nd res pondent to dispose of the main matter itself on merits, , , ,, Accoinalv, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2r respondent to pass a final order n case No. GRP/PRA/ 78/95-96 Till then the respondent shall not take steps to deioiish te bui.lding if any constructed pthe petitioner. Sd/ JUDGE C OPY AS’ TREGISTPAR HIGH C3RT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE,