IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.702 of 2008 DILIP KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2/ 4/7/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the selection of respondent No.9 on the post of Panchayat Teacher to his prejudice and he claims to be better qualified. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has come to this Court because of his inability to avail the statutory remedy under Rule-18 of the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teachers (Appointment and Service Conditions) Rules, 2006 since the statutory authority refused to accept his representation. He relies upon annexure-5 dated 8.11.2007 appended to the writ application wherein this fact has been asserted. The writ application is disposed with the liberty to the petitioner to submit before the District Magistrate his representation addressed to respondent No.6, the statutory authority. The District Magistrate concerned, on the day that the representation is presented before him, shall forward it to the respondent No.6. Respondent No.6 shall then be obliged to decide the representation after hearing all concerned, in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date that the application is received by him from the office of the District Magistrate. KC ( Navin Sinha,J )