IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25509 of 2007 1. SURENDRA NARAYAN JHA @ CHAUDHARY SURENDRA NARAYAN JHA 2. Chaudhary Yogendra Narayan Jha @ Nandji Both sons of Late Chaudhary Indra Narayan Jha. 3. Mostt. Indu Devi @ Indu Jha daughter of Chaudhary Indra Narayan Jha. All. (S. Nos. 1 to 3) residents of village Rasulpur Saharsa @ Baheri, P. S. Baheri, District- Darbhanga. … Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR …. Opposite 1st party 2. Siya Lal Mahto 3. Shivjee Mahto Opp. No. 2 and 3 are resident of village Rasulpur Sohram @ Baheri, P. S. Baheri, District- Darbhanga. … Opposite 2nd party. 4. Chaudhary Rajendra Narain Jha son of late Chaudhary Chandra Narain Jha resident of village Rasulpur @ Baheri, P.S. Baheri, District- Darbhanga. .. Opp. 3rd party. ----------- 6. 30.07.2009. Heard counsel for the petitioners and counsel for the informant. A proceeding under Section 145 Cr.P.c. cannot be an answer to a dispute regarding title. In the present case, the intervenor petitioners have already filed a title suit no. 96 of 2006 pending before Sub judge, 1st Dharbanga. In view of the matter his challenge to the impugned order dropping 145 proceedings or the revision order affirming said order of leaned magistrate must fail as this court in exercise of power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. would not find any reason to interfere with the - 2 - impugned order. The intervenor petitioner infact had not adopted a correct course as the criminal court deciding the dispute under Section 145 Cr.P.C. could not never relief which actually the petitioners want in the garb of getting possession over the disputed properties including a house. That being so, this application is wholly misconceived and is accordingly dismissed. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)