s:''l'$- v .........^s^ l^; ^^^•"" ^r®^;^^_ '^•"""' '.'. : ; ' • ! ! .. y IN THE HIGHCOURT OF CHHAmSGARH ATBI1.ASPUR . 463-?-_ Writ Petitionfs) No. of 2006. PetitJoner ; J. R.Verma, s/o Late Shri Vishwanath Verma , aged about 57 years, Tahsildar Kasdol, Resident of Kasdol Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh). D-CO?<1 ^^^^^^^ ^•-1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Revenue,Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) " 2. Collector, Raipur Distt. Raipur(Chhattisgarh) /--3. Collector, Janjgir-Champa Disff. Janjgir-Champa(Chhattisgarh) APPRQP&IATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION ETC. XI-HC-78 3TI^T^iTR?ira; traTw^rgww <': KI^MI Sh*11<sh 3^'^TPTRW, »T{1'H'l<o, Rifliuy .^:J5.($J.Lt^?-^ 2006 3TI^[?TV^K (yif^q<<ff) S^TOK Hf^tT 3fI^T ^ 30-8-2006 Mr. Sanjay K. lAgrawal, cou^isel Mr. Sumedi B<y<y, 6overro(»ent advance copy. Heard both the counsel. By the jnstant writ petitio^i of India, the petitioner has chal 2006 (Annexure P-9) passed transferred from Kasdol to Distrijyt': The petitioner is working that he has been tronsferred witd earlier- transferred victe order dated to Kasdol. Further case of the mentol ailment <md die is taking available in J<ay9ir, as such, t) petitioner is subjected to transfet In the circumstances, lear|ned the petitioner may be allowed to respondent No.l be directed to| appearin9 for the State/responde^ts Having hem-d lea'ned cour^sel facts <and circumstances of the the petitioner is just, fair and to make a detailed representatio^ this writ petition and jts annexut °t>i<ifci<fl-f tiiiMT^'tei^t<R]t&i< ^arf^R'sn^T •fw the petitioner. Advocate for the State/respondents, on under Article 226/227 of the Constitution (en9ed his transfer order dated l7t August, respondent No.l, whereby he has been 'ijyt': Jarygir-ChiOTpa )as Tehsildar. The case of the petitioner is in a period of one yeor five months, as he was 16-1-2CXM (Amexwe P-7) from Abhanpur (letitioner is that his »»ifeis wfferiry from •tt'eatfflent at Raipw. There is no such facility |ie trcnsfer is punitwe in nnture and the almost every year. counsel for the petitioner submits that i^iake a representation to respondent No.l and decide the same to uhich learned counsel has noobjection. for the parties ond having regord to the '., the prayer made by lecrned counsel for '.. Therefore, 1+ie petitioner is allowed raising all his grievotwes, annexing a copy of f^s to respondent No.l within 10 days from P.T.O. clase. re4son<A>le. XI-HC-78 tTTq^TaiHlth 3^'^rraTcpr, ®-rfl'M'i(»,Ricii+iy .__^p[S)Lth3'3'T- ^ ^ 2006 an^riraw (yil^q^) w^T^rf^tw (ISTT3n^Ts»ili°ti Soma ?R[TW«f?(T3:n^T Nb.l today and in tum, respondent the petitioner within a perioti df considering the objections rais^d acdordance with law. In thel petitioner is decided, the (Annexure P-9) in respect of the^ petitioner With the directions afor*4said, Consequently, M.(W.)P.No|: Parties are entitled for c^rtified ^.1 is directed to decide the representation of M days from the date of its receipt, (rfter by the petitioner in an objective manner, in mean time, till the representation of the and operation of the impugned order diall remain stayed. I, the petition stands disposed of. 13581/2006 also stends disposed of. copy of this order. _^ effect +i'iit<-)<fl-< >ii*iciTffte^t<Ri«i< ^sff^Tsn^T L.C.Bhadoo Judge P.T.O. v^ 'dto '^ '^ /-dN K^