1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 474 of 2008 IN SUIT NO. 385 of 2008 Dabur India Ltd. ...Plaintiffs v/s. Daxal Cosmetics Private Limited & anr. ...Defendants Mr. Vijay Tulzapurkar, Sr. Advocate a/w. Mr. Sumit Raghani i/b. PDS Legal for the plaintiffs. Mr. Punit Jani i/b. G.S.hegde & V.A. Bhagat for defendants. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR, J DATED:- September 24, 2009. P.C. This Court upon hearing Counsel for the Plaintiff had passed ad-interim order in terms of prayer clauses (b) & (d) for reasons recorded in its order dated 22nd January, 2008. The Defendants have been duly served. Defendant No. 1 who is the contesting party has not chosen to file any reply affidavit so far. Whereas, Counsel appearing for the said Defendant No. 1 states on instructions that the Defendant No. 1 has already stopped using the trade marks in question. 2 In view of this statement, ad-interim relief as granted is confirmed. Accordingly, Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b) and (d). Motion disposed of in the above terms. (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)