R.S.A No. 1863 of 2006 (O&M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A No. 1863 of 2006 Date of decision : November 20, 2008 Roop Singh, ...... Appellant. through Mr.H.S.Rakhra, Advocate v. Area Manager & others, ...... Respondents through Mr.S.S.Bhinder, Advocate Mr.S.S.Sidhu, Advocate CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) This appeal has been filed against the concurrent judgments of the Courts below dismissing the suit of the plaintiff/appellant for declaration and permanent injunction against the defendant/respondents for restraining them from auctioning his house on the ground of default on his part to repay the loan amount. Apart from the fact that such a suit is barred under Section 55 of the Cooperative Societies Act, 1961, it is also to be seen that the appellant did not lead any evidence and consequently, the learned trial Court was constrained to close his evidence under Order 17 Rule 3 of the CPC and thereafter dismissed the suit on the ground that no evidence had been led. Even before me learned counsel for the appellant has not disputed R.S.A No. 1863 of 2006 (O&M) ::2:: that infact the loan was taken by the appellant. In the circumstances, finding no infirmity in the judgments of both the Courts below, I hold that the questions of law proposed do not arise in this appeal. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. ( AJAY TEWARI ) November 20 , 2008. JUDGE `kk'