{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 7 OF 2009 Sau.Chandabai Baban Raut and others Appellants Versus Avinash Haribhau Ghule and others Respondents Mr.A.K.Gawali, advocate for appellants. Mr.V.P.Latange, advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr.V.S.Bedre, advocate for Respondents No.7, 8 & 9. Mr.Y.V.Kakade, advocate for Respondent No.12. Mr.Awsarkar, advocate holding for Mr.B.V.Wagh, advocate for Respondent No.54. Dismissed as against Respondents No.5 and 10, as per Registrar’s order dated 18.02.2010. CORAM : R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 23 rd March, 2011 PER COURT: 1 Shri Gawali, learned Counsel for appellants, has invited my attention to the interim order passed by this Court on 04.02.2009. This Court has directed the parties to maintain status quo regarding structures raised by 14 persons, whose names are enlisted in the list at Exhibit “X” annexed to the appeal, till disposal of the suit. The suit is directed to be decided expeditiously. 2 Shri Gawali submits that the dispute pertains to 80 ares’ land. Out of the disputed property, it is contended by the appellants that the parties have resolved their differences in respect of a portion to the {2} extent of 60 ares’ land. The Court is, thus, required to adjudicate in respect of rights of the parties in relation to remaining 20 ares’ land. It is also submitted that there is only one structure raised on the remaining 20 ares’ disputed land. 3 The interim order contained in para 9 of the order, passed by this Court on 04.02.2009, shall remain operative in respect of the structure raised on the disputed property by the persons, whose names are included in the list at Exhibit “X” annexed to the appeal. The parties shall maintain status quo in respect of the structure raised on the disputed property till the disposal of the suit. Parties to the litigation undertake to cooperate for early disposal of the suit. The trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible, preferably by the end of year 2011. 4 With these directions, the Appeal from Order stands disposed of. In view of the disposal of Appeal from Order, pending Civil Application also stand disposed of. In the facts and circumstances of this case, there shall be no order as to costs. R.M.BORDE JUDGE adb/ao709