1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.11.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU HABEAS CORPUS PETITION(MD).No.572 of 2011 C.Amma Pazham : Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Anjukiramam Police Station, Mayiladi (Post), Kanyakumari District. 3.H.Vijila : Respondents PRAYER: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the body and person of the petitioner's husband namely N.Chandrasekaran aged about 41 years before this Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Rajasekar For Respondents 1&2 : Mr.A.Ramar Additional Public Prosecutor O R D E R *********** [Order of the Court was made by M.JAICHANDREN, J.] This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed praying that this Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the petitioner's husband, namely, N.Chandrasekaran, aged about 41 years, before this Court and to set him at liberty. 2. It has been stated, in the affidavit filed in support of the Habeas Corpus Petition, that the detenu has been kept in illegal custody, by the third respondent. The petitioner had lodged complaints, before the second respondent police, on 16.03.2010 and 24.03.2010. Since, no efforts had been taken to trace out the detenu, the petitioner has filed the present Habeas Corpus Petition before this Court. 3. A Status Report, dated 28.08.2011, has been filed before this Court, by the second respondent. In the said Status Report, it has been stated that there used to be frequent quarrel between the petitioner and her husband, namely, N.Chandrasekaran. In such circumstances, the detenu had eloped with H.Vijila, the third respondent herein. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing on behalf of respondents 1 and 2, had also stated that the detenu is not in the illegal custody of the third respondent, as they are living happily, together. 5. In such circumstances, since, no further orders are necessary, this Habeas Corpus Petition stands dismissed. sd/- Assistant Registrar (C.O) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Anjukiramam Police Station, Mayiladi (Post), Kanyakumari District. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. ORDER MADE IN HABEAS CORPUS PETITION(MD)No.572 of 2011 18.11.2011 NB RJ/7.12.11 2p/4c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/