1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 712 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1851 OF 2008 Smt. Satyawati Shantaram Shinde & ors........Appellants versus Kashinath Vishwasrao Dinde ........ Respondent. Mrs. Smita Gaidhani adv. for the Appellants None for the respondents CORAM: A. P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 20th FEBRUARY, 2009. P.C.: 1. The respondent/plaintiff instituted a suit for perpetual injunction based on title and possession. The plaintiff has purchased the suit property under two registered sale deeds in the year 1928 and in the year 1942. The documents are in modi script and its translation has been placed on record of the court below. After considering the evidence on record both the courts below have concurrently found that the plaintiff is in possession and the plaintiff's possession is referable to a valid title and thus granted perpetual injunction. The present appellants are claiming right and title to the property from their predecessor in title who in turn has sold the property to the respondent/plaintiff. 2. Perused the judgment. The same does not call for 2 any interference. No substantial question of law emerges for consideration. Hence second appeal is summarily dismissed. 3. In view of the dismissal of the second appeal, the civil application does not survive and the same is also dismissed. (A. P. DESHPANDE, J.)