)a gg’y/ PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR mmw mm: 1. (Harishchand Pr'asad Dewangan, 5/0 Janak Ram Dewangan, aged about 6O years, Headmasfer Gov’r. Primary School, Charpar‘a, Block— SakTi, Dis’rT. Janjgir- Champa (6.6.) 2%. Harishankar PaTel, 5/0 La‘re Shri Premnamyan, aged abouT 61 yéars, Headmaster, Govta’wg Primary School, Temar', Block- Sakfi , Dis’rf. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 3. Duje Ram Jaiswal, S/o Shri Nankir‘am, aged abouT 59 yearé, Upper Division Teacher, Gov‘r. :‘Middle School Barpalikala Block—Sakfi, Dis’r‘r. - Janjgir— l Champa (C.G.) VERSUS I Sfa’re/of ChhaT’risgarh Thro’Ugh :~ The. Secrel‘ary, Educa’rion Department D.K.S. : 1. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.{)L i 2. Dis‘rricf'Educafion Officer, Dish”. Janjgir—Champa (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer, SakTi, Dis’n‘. Jungir—Champa (C.G.) 4. Joim‘ Direc’ror‘, Treasury, Accoun’r & Pension, Bilaspur, Dish“. Biiaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. W HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR ‘WRIT PETITION (S) NO.7697 OF 2010 PETITIONERS Harishchand Prasad Dewangan & 9 Others Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon‘ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri A.S. Rajput, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.V. Sridhar, Panel Lawyerforthe State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 6‘“ day of January, 201 1) 1. The petitioners were initially appointed on a fixed pay of Rs.100/—. After completion of the probation period, the petitioners were granted regular pay scale. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in the case is asto whether, the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or after completion of probation period. 3. The issue involved. herein was considered by the Mad’hya Pradesh v State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of MP. & others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers were entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date/bfsinitial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/ Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from dat_e of initial appointment. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners also submits that this court, while considering the same issue in Amar Sai Ram & others v. e \ State of Chhattisgarh & others [W.P. (S) No.4,725/2006] by order dated 01.09.2006, allowed the petitioner to make a representation within a period often days, raising all their grievances. Accordingly, the petitioners are granted liberty to make a representation raising all the grievances and in turn, the concerned respondent is directed to decide the representation, if any, in accordance with law and the aforestated decisions, on its own merits, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, subject to verification of the facts. In view of the foregoing, this petition is disposed of. /sal \"\\ Satish K. Agn'motn bdge ‘\ \\ \\ /‘