IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 23RD MAY 2011 / 2ND JYAISHTA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 1357 of 2011() ------------------------- CRIME NO. 159/2010 OF PERUVANNAMUZHY POLICE STATION ................... PETITIONER : --------------------- BABU JOSEPH, S/O.JOSEPH, ALAKKAL HOUSE, NOW RESIDING AT `DIVYASREE', MALAPARAMBA P.O., CALICUT. BY ADV. SRI.SUNNY MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERUVANNAMUZHY - 673528. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERAMBRA - 673525. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CBCID, KOZHIKODE -673001. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE HOME SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. R1 TO R4 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. PUSHPALATHA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn THOMAS P JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------- Crl.M.C.No.1357of 2011 --------------------------------------- Dated this 23rd day of May, 2011 ORDER Petitioner is the de facto complainant in Crime No.159 of 2010 of Peruvannamuzhy Police Station for offences punishable under Secs.406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. According to the petitioner, he is the registered owner of a vehicle bearing registration number KL-56-4500 and when he went abroad, he entrusted the vehicle to his elder brother, Mathew Joseph. Petitioner returned to his native place on 24.02.2010 and demanded the vehicle but Mathew Joseph refused to return the vehicle. According to the petitioner, Mathew Joseph forged documents of the vehicle as if it is transferred to him. Hence the complaint. Grievance of petitioner is that the first respondent has not properly investigated the case. Hence it is requested that investigation may be handed over to the third respondent, Superintendent of Police, CBCID, Kozhikode. Learned counsel submitted that there is no proper investigation of the case. Learned Public Prosecutor after getting instruction submitted that investigation is being proceeded with and that certain documents are to be obtained from the R.T Office. Sample Crl.M.C.No.1357 of 2011 -: 2 :- signature of petitioner is to be collected and send to the expert for opinion. It is revealed from the submission of learned Public Prosecutor that investigation is being proceeded with. At this stage, there is no reason to interfere with the investigation or transfer investigation to any other officer. This criminal miscellaneous case is closed. (THOMAS P JOSEPH, JUDGE) Sbna/-