IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2815 of 2010 RAM HANSDA, SON OF GORELAL HANSDA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-KUSHI TARI, POLICE STATION-LAXMIPUR, DISTRICT-JAMUI. …..Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …..Opposite Party. For the Petitioner : Mr. Satya Prakash Parasar (Adv.). For the State : Mr. B.B. Kr. (APP). ----------- 02/ 16.02.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered under Sections 376/511/379/302 and some other Sections of the Indian Penal Code against unknown. One unknown criminal tried to outrage the modesty of the informant then her mother-in-law came for rescue. That criminal killed the informant’s mother-in-law and took the ornaments after cutting the informant’s nose. It appears from Annexure-2 and 3, that trial has begun and the informant has identified the petitioner. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the informant in her cross-examination has stated that she has identified the petitioner at behest of the 2 Officer-in-Charge. The trial has begun. Considering the heinous nature of allegation and evidence against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the above named petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. kksinha/ ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)