Petitioner Defendant HIGH COUBT OF QaHAT ! ISGARE AT BlgA§PQR Writ Petition (227) No 41% of 2009 Pukhraj Golchha, Sic Shri Chandanmal, Aged about 72 years. Satafa Vyapari Rio' Sadar Bazar, Rajnandgaon‘(C.G.) r u Versus Anand Kumar Jain, Slo $hri Gyanchand Jain, Aged about 30 ye’ars,’ Ric sgadar‘ ‘ Bazar,Rajnandgaon (C.G.} ‘ ~ (Writ Petititpn under Article 227 of the Constitution 0f India)» (SB: Hon’ble Mr" T.P. Shanna, J.) « Present Mr Sumesh Balal, counsei for the petitioner Mr $ C Verma ccunsel for the tesuondant QRAL cRpER‘ (Dagsed on 25‘“ Navember, zeos) , Bv thrs oetrtlon under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petrtioner has prayed for Issuance of wnt In the nature of mandamus t9 the authority . l have heard learned counsel for the parties, , Learned counsel for the oetitroner submits that during the pendenoy of the appea' !earned 3rd CM! Judge Class-I! Rarnandgaon has amended the gudgment and decree which was not rust and proper and was wrthout runsdlctlon Dunne the course of arguments learned counsel for the respondent submits that he has no objertron if the order rmeugned we quashed and onporhlmtv 0f rarsrng grounds before the aopellate Court by tiling approprlate apolloetlon or by other means re olven to the respondent Learned counsel further submits that the case has already been trsted on 3.12.2009 before the 1.“ Addrtronel Sessions Judge; Rajnandgaon, r Takrng into conSideratron the submissron made bv both the oarties, the petition rs allowed Order dated 15 72“09 pas d by the 3'“ CM! JLdge Class-ll Rajnandgaon 1n Crvrl MJC No 6/09 rs hereby quashed However the ‘ r partree may redress thew grievances before the Furst Aopellate Court bv way“ of flrng a propnate aopllcatron for amendment No order as to costs Certified copy as per rulesr Bl- Sd/— ' ”LP Shanna l Judge