IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 223 OF 2005 DATTATRAY SANTARAM PATIL,MARGAO ....Petitioners GOA. Versus THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF ....Respondents CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND 2 ORS., Shri Amit A. Palekar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Ms. Rakhi Chodankar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the respondents No.1 and 3. Shri Joaquim Godinho, Advocate for the respondent No.2. Coram:- R. M. LODHA, J. Date:- 15th September, 2005 P.C. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks to impugn the legality and correctness of the Judgment and Order passed by the Nominee of the Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Goa. The said order came to be passed by the Authority under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Section 154 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 provides for remedy by way of revision by the State Government and the Registrar. Since the impugned order came to be passed by the Nominee of the Registrar, the State Government shall be the revisionary Authority. The remedy provided under Section 154 being adequate and efficient, I find no justification to entertain this writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed in limine. However, dismissal of the writ petition shall not preclude the petitioners from approaching the revisionary Authority. R. M. LODHA, J.