1 D.B.CIVIL WRIT (PAROLE) PETITION NO.9525/2009. Vijay Singh @ Daulat Ram. VERSUS State of Rajasthan & Ors. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER D.B.CIVIL WRIT (PAROLE) PETITION NO.9525/2009. Vijay Singh @ Daulat Ram. VERSUS State of Rajasthan and Others. 27.10.2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.S.CHAUDHARI Mr.Vinay Pal Yadav, for the petitioner. Mrs.Rekha Madnani, Deputy Government Counsel. ***** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Deputy Government Counsel. On the previous date, after perusing the reply filed by the respondents, this court directed the learned Government Counsel to furnish the details of the cases of which reference has been made in para No.8 of the letter of Superintendent of Police dated 04.06.2009 wherein it has been mentioned that the petitioner was involved in seven more cases. In response to the aforesaid on 23.10.2009, the respondents have filed a letter of Superintendent of Police dated 21.10.2009 along with a list of cases in 2 D.B.CIVIL WRIT (PAROLE) PETITION NO.9525/2009. Vijay Singh @ Daulat Ram. VERSUS State of Rajasthan & Ors. which the petitioner is said to be involved. The total number of such cases is 13 and the petitioner-prisoner is convicted inasmuch as 6 cases including the present case. Some of these cases are for the offences under Section 392 as well as 394 I.P.C. In the facts and circumstances, therefore, we do not find it to be a fit case in which the parole should be granted to the petitioner at this stage. Consequently, the petition filed by the prisoner- petitioner Vijay Singh @ Daulat Ram son of Lakkhu Ram stands dismissed. (K.S.CHAUDHARI),J. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.