^ u' / • HIGH COURT OF CHHATI'ISGAMH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RE8PONDENTS Amft WMT PETITION (S) No. 4709 aSXW6 Smt. Shashi ftabha Sahu wife of Shri Stesh Kumar Sahu, agsd about 21 years, Resideat of Village Tivragudi, Viliage Panehayat Tiwagudl, lyock/Janpad Panchayat Bamataiynagai, District ? 8urguja(C.G.) •VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Throuah: The Secretary, Department of Wcanen and ChUd Developm^t D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. T!ie Commissioner, Womaa aad Child Development, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Coltector, Aaibikapur, District Surguja (Q,0.) 4. The Projeet Officet, Womea and Ohild v Devdopment, Amtnkapur, District Sui^uja (CjQ.) 5. The Chief Executive Qfficer, Janpad Banchayait Ramamyiiagar, District Suiguja (C.G.)T K 6. Villaee Panchayat Tivraeudi, Throu^h: The « Sarpaiich, Village Panfihayat Tiviagidi, Jarigad Panehayat Raaianujn^ar, District Suryja, (C.O.) 7. Snit. Neelima Pandey Wiie ofShri Vtjay Patui^, „ resident of Villay Panchayat Paadripatii, Villa^" ; fsmsbsyat Tiwagudi, Saxyad Panchayat ^ Ramanujnagar, District Surguja (C.G.) WRTT PETTTION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CCNSTTTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Me Shri Satish K. Aenihotal. J. Pr^ent: Sfari V.K.Pandey, Advocatsfbrthepetitioner. Smt Binu Sharma, Panel Lawyer fbr the State/respondeHt.NQ. lto4. Sfari Ashok Shukla, Advocate for respondent No. 7. ORALORUER (Passsd on 10n day of Jaiuary, 2008) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for fhe petitioner sedks permission of ttis Court to wilfadraw fliis petitiwi with liberty to take reeuurse to attemative remedy that may be available to him, to which the leM-ned counsel appearing for the State/respondents have no objeetion. 2. It is ordered accordingly. 3. The petitioa is dismissed as wilhdrawa with tiie above stated liberty. No ;...,. order asto costs. _ . SdA SatishK.Agnihotri Judge