BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty First day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.14733 of 2011 SIVAGURUNATHAN ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SUBRAMANIAPURAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY, CR.NO. 1411/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT K.LAKSHMAN .. INTERVENOR For Petitioner : M/S. M.AJMAL KHAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) For Intervenor : MR.K.VAMANAN, Advocate PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner was arrested on 22.09.2011 for the alleged offence punishable under Section 174 of Cr.P.C., and later altered into 306 of IPC., in Crime No.1411 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail. 2. Heard Mr.M.Ajmal Khan, Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.K.S.Durai Pandian, Learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing for the State and Mr.K.Vamanan, Learned counsel for the intervenor and also perused the materials available on record. 3. According to the case of prosecution, due to wordy quarrel between the petitioner and the deceased, who are husband and wife, which resulted to the deceased to commit suicide. On this allegation, the present case has been registered against him. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit in his argument that even though the petition is entitled for statutory bail under Section 167(2), this Court may also be considered regular bail and no prejudice would be caused to the prosecution in the event of the petitioner's released on bail. He would also submit that he is also having permanent residence and therefore, he would request for the grant of bail. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the offences said to have been committed by the petitioner are serious in nature and the investigation is still pending. If for any reason, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, suitable conditions may be passed for the secured presence of the petitioner. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 22.09.2011, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.IV, Madurai, and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders for the purpose of interrogation. sd/- 21/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.IV, MADURAI. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SUBRAMANIAPURAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY. 5. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. M.AJMAL KHAN Advocate SR.No.40707 SR : 21.11.2011 : 2P/7C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14733 of 2011 Date :21/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/