1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5043 OF 2009 Dada Bapu Salgar .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. Ujwal Agand Surve, for the Applicant Mrs. P. P.Shinde, APP for the Respondent-State CORAM:- SHRI V. M. KANADE, J. DATED : 27 th January, 2010 P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant and the learned APP for the State . 2. This is the second application for bail filed by the present applicant. His first application was rejected by this Court by an order dated 17 th February, 2009. Liberty was granted to the applicant to apply again. The applicant was arrested in connection with the offences under Sections 302, 324, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. His first application was rejected on merits. 2 3. The applicant's grievance is that the role attributed to him is only of instigation. It is submitted that though the trial is expedited, trial has not yet began. It is further submitted that the other co-accused has been released on bail by an order dated 2 nd September, 2009 and therefore on the ground of parity he has filed this application. 4. In my view, no case is made out for grant of bail. So far as co-accused Madhukar is concerned, he was released on bail by this Court by an order dated 2 nd September, 2009 as no specific role has been attributed to him by any of the witnesses. So far as the applicant is concerned, the role of assault and instigation has been attributed to him. Therefore the applicant cannot be released on bail on the ground of parity. The application for bail is rejected. 5. The Sessions Court is directed to decide the Sessions case as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of six months. (V. M. KANADE, J.) jpc/-