IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 9926 of 2007 Between: Florence Dasari W/o. Late Gnanasundaram Jeevan Sali, D/o. N. Satyanarayana, aged 35 yrs, Advocate, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Registrar General for Stamps and Registration, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 2 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration & Urban Development Secretariat, Hyderabad. 4 Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Rep. by its Commissioner, Hyderabad. 5 Ananda Bai Sasa @ Ananda Bai Sali @ Annie Sali 2605, West Street, River Grove, Illinois-60171, USA & Also at D.No. 8-3- 228/187 and 188, Rahmat Nagar, Yousufguda, Hyderabad. 6 Basa Sundari age and wife of not known to the petitioners 8-3-228/187 and 188, Rahmat Nagar, Yousufguda, Hyderabad. 7 The Anti Corruption Bureau, Rep. by its Director, Mozamjahi Market, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, or order or orders or directions particularly in the nature of writ fo Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents NO. 1 to 4 for not taking any action in response to the legal notice dt. 7-8-2006 whioch was acknowledged and thereby prosecute the respondents No.5 & 6 and other persons who registered the property illegally with the help of notaries as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law violative of Registration Act 1908 Indian Stamp Act 1899 and Notaries Act 1952 and consequently direct the official respondents to take appropriate action under the provisions of the Indian Registration Act, against the Private respondents herein as well as the residents of Yousufguda for not registering their properties and further direct the seventh respondent to conduct appropriate enquiry agains the officials who are responsible for the illegal transfers without any registration of the documents and further take action against Notary public who are not authorised for illegal, transfers by way of affixing their stamps on the sale deeds by authorizisng the illegal transfers and thereby take appropriate action against the concerned Notary public besides direct the 3rd and 7th respondents to take action against the Municipal authorities for allowing the public to raise buildings without proper documentation and permission, in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble High Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.V.RAJA RAAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.NO.9926 OF 2007 ORAL ORDER Smt.Triveni, Advocate representing Sri M.V.Rajaram, the learned counsel for the petitioner on record states that the counsel have returned the bundle to the parties. The matter was listed on 01.06.2009. There being no appearance on behalf of the petitioner the matter is listed to this day for dismissal. On the basis of the above representation the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. _________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J 4TH JUNE 2009 *TSNR