Criminal Revision No. 1824 of 2011(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. 1824 of 2011(O&M) Date of decision:17th August, 2011 Vinod Saini .......Petitioner Versus Smt. Babita Rani and another ........Respondents BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr. Amit Jain Advocate for the petitioner. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?Yes/No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No A.N.Jindal, J.(Oral) For the reasons stated in the application the delay of 43 days in filing the present revision petition is condoned. Criminal Misc. No. 43830 and 43832 of 2011 and Criminal Revision No. 1824 of 2011 The petitioner though has projected to be earning nothing yet he is able bodied person. `2,000/- were paid to wife and `1,000/- to the minor son as an interim relief. The petitioner states that he had paid `2,00,000/- towards permanent alimony in the petition of divorce by way of mutual consent but no cheque number or any copy of the draft has been produced before the Court. In view of the meager amount awarded to the respondents Criminal Revision No. 1824 of 2011(O&M) 2 the petitioner is legally liable to maintain them. No ground is made out to interfere. Dismissed. [A.N.JINDAL] JUDGE 17th August, 2011 Shivani Kaushik