IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 27TH OCTOBER 2011 / 5TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 28606 of 2011(A) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. RAFNA RAZIK, AGED 20 YEARS, D/O.ABDUL RAZIK, 'WISH',CHETAMKUNNU, THALASSERY-670101 2. SHREYA MENON, AGED 20 YEARS, D/O.K.P.KRISHNAKUMAR, 50/777-J 'KSHITIJ',KOSSERRY LANE, PONEKKARA ROAD, EDAPPALLY, KOCHI-682024 BY ADV. SRI.BABU KARUKAPADATH SMT.M.A.VAHEEDA BABU SRI.JAGAN GEORGE SRI.K.A.NOUSHAD SRI.P.G.PRAMOD RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REP.BY ITS REGISTRAR, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM-PIN-676505 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM-PIN-676505 BY ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss W.P.(C) NO.28606/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P1:- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 22/10/2011 FOR REVALUATION OF THE ANSWER SHEETS SUBMITTED BY THE IST PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P2:- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 22/10/2011 FOR REVALUATION OF THE ANSWER SHEETS SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P3:- TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 22/10/2011 EVIDENCING THE REMITTANCE OF THE FEE BY THE IST PETITIONER FOR REVALUATION OF THE ANSWER PAPERS. EXT.P4:- TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 22/10/2011 EVIDENCING THE REMITTANCE OF THE FEE BY THE 2ND PETITIONER FOR REVALUATION OF THE ANSWER PAPERS. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS NIL:- TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 28606 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 27th day of October, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners are 6th semester B.Arch students. When the result of the 3rd Semester examination was declared, petitioners failed in different subjects. They applied for revaluation as per Exts.P1 and P2 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the University for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp