[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.732 OF 2008 Hiraba Sakharam Shinde ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.V.V.Purwant Advocate for Applicant Ms.P.P.Shinde APP for the State ... WITH CRIMINAL APPLN.NO. 733 OF 2008 Kisan Dhondiba Kadam ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.V.V.Purwant Advocate for Applicant Mr.K.V.Saste APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JULY 15, 2008 DATE : JULY 15, 2008 DATE : JULY 15, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicants and the learned A.P.P. for the State in both the matters. 2. The applicants are seeking bail in CR No.558 of 2006 of Turbhe Police Station, Navi Mumbai. The said case is under Sections 302 and 201 of IPC. [-2-] 3. The prosecution case is that the applicant Kisan was cousin of Hiraba. Hiraba was husband of deceased Mangal. Hiraba had an affair with his sister in law and hence, there was quarrel between him and Mangal every day on account of the said affair. Hiraba was fed up on account of quarrel and hence, on 1.5.2006 he took the deceased with him in a jeep. Kisan was also in the jeep. They took Mangal to forest and thereafter both the applicants strangulated Mangal and thereafter dead body of Mangal was set on fire. Witnesses have stated that on 1.5.2006, deceased was last seen in the company of both the applicants. Besides this, there is an extra judicial confession on record of both the accused to witnesses. In my view, there is sufficient material on record to show the involvement of the applicants in the crime. Hence, I do not think that this is a fit case to grant bail to the applicants. 4. Applications are rejected and disposed of accordingly. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]