IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.5052 of 2010 LALO PASWAN @ LALI PASWAN, son of Shri Yogendra Paswan Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 07.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner’s name has been disclosed by the informant on hearsay but there is no firsthand witness on the point of the petitioner’s participation in the occurrence. The witnesses examined paragraph 7 and 8 have stated the name of the petitioner on the basis of hearsay of having learnt from the informant. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named, who is in custody since 5.10.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea, in connection with Janki Nagar P.S. case no. 69 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be the mother of the petitioner, who will take responsibility for the petitioner’s conduct after his release from the jail custody,(ii)that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse,(iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do - 2 - so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iv) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)