IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15937 of 2008 JAI NATH TIWARY & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 10.09.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case for the offences registered under Sections 304(B), 201 of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted that petitioners are father-in-law and mother-in-law of the daughter of the complainant. It is further submitted that the daughter of the complainant as well as son of the petitioners took poison and in course of treatment daughter of the complainant died. However, the son of the petitioners survived but later on was arrested and is in custody. It is further submitted that the complainant on realizing the true state of affairs filed an application for withdrawal of the complaint as contained in Annexure-3 and thereupon the order was passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran on 15.07.2004 to the effect that in case, the FIR is not registered, the complaint may be returned back. Learned Addl. P.P. on the other hand submits that the allegations are against all the accused persons. Considering the submissions as made above, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a 2 period of four weeks from today, the petitioners, namely, Jai Nath Tiwary and Prabhawati Devi be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Mashrakh P.S. Case No. 209 of 2004 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)