IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29501 of 2011 1.Saryug Sharma son of late Turai Sharma 2.Hatta Sharma son of Saryug Sharma 3.Lakhkhi Devi @ Lakhiya Devi wife of late Turai Sharma All residents of village-Bishnichak Chandpur, P.S.-Falka (Pothia O.P.), Dist.- Katihar Versus The State of Bihar ----------- 2. 28.9.2011. Heard learned counsel for petitioners, learned counsel for the complainant and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with a case in which cognizance for the offence punishable under sections 376, 323 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code has been taken. At the outset learned counsel for petitioners submits that he is not pressing the application for grant of anticipatory bail so far as petitioner no.1 is concerned. Accordingly, prayer for grant of anticipatory bail of petitioner no.1, namely, Saryug Sharma is rejected. So far as petitioner nos.2 and 3 are concerned, there is no allegation of rape against them. They simply happen to be son and mother respectively of the main accused, Saryug Sharma. The case arises out of a complaint. Taking into consideration nature of allegation, let petitioner nos. 2 and 3, namely, Hatta Sharma and Lakhkhi Devi @ Lakhiya Devi in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/communication of the order be released on bail on furnishing 2 bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with Complaint Case No.C.A.1033 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Md.S. ( Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)