Iri -y^gHSS^ ^fWffi l^;^:A^"ft^. ':^ ^•'•^••" " Cf(VQ^— IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) PETITIONERS: ^:^/ f s<F VERSUS w ^_ Q < •fe-No. 72007 Smt. Shashi Das Sharma j3/0 Shri Shuka Dev das, Aged '?8 Working as Lecturer v R/o Gram & Post Tapkara Dist. Jashpur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS: A ^ 1. State ofChhattisgarh Through : Secretaiy, Tribal Welfare ^^v /^if|/ ^" Department, Mantralaya D.K.S. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Pt. R.S.S. University Campus, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) PETITION UNDEft ARTICLES ^26 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUAWCB qF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AN& PQR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS:- -^. HI6H COURTOF CHHATTES6ARH AT Bn-ASPUR W. P.(S^No. 936 of 20)7 Petitioner ; Smt. Shashi Das Sharma Verais Respondents State of Chhattisgarii & another Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agrohotri. Mr. Manoj OwuhanSiarma, Adwcate for •the Petitioner. Ms. Dipati Pandey, Pcmel Lowyer for the State/re^>ondents. ORDER (Passed on this 20th Ooy of February, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for -the petitioner submits •ihact the petitioner is working as Lecturer. The petitioner has obtained B.Ed. Examination cert'ificate in the year 1991, on his own expenses. 2. Leumed counsel cppearing for 1+»e petitioner aibmits that the question involved, herein asto whether the teacher, who obtnined B.Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses, is entitled to tmo advance increments. 3. According to teamed counsel for the petitioner, 'the petitioner is entitted to two advance increments in vfew of the decision of this Court- in •the case. of yashwant Kumar Bharadwcy Vs. Municipal Corporotion. Durg <iml another {2006 01) WPJR-CG 96}. This Court in the case of Yashwunt Kumar Bhanidwuj Vs. Municipal Corporation, &urg ond cmother (Supra), came to the conctusion that the teachers, who hnd obtnined B. Ed. /B.T.I. Examinort-ion &rtificate on 1+ieir own -y T' expenses, dre covered by the circular dated 24.12.98 issued by the State ©ovemmentof Machyn Pradesh. Leamed counsel for the petitioner further submits Ihat -the facts aid question of taw involved in the present case cre squarely covered by decision of this Court- in -the case of yashwwnt Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supro), to which learned coun»lappearmg for the reqaondents fairly concedes <md ogrees with +he averment made by learned counse-t appearing for the petjtioner. Accordingfy, the writ petition is allowed in terms of •the order passed in the case of Vashwant Kunar Bharadwaj Vs. Muntcipal CorporatKNi, Ourg and another (&ipro), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner hcis acquired B.Ed. Exumination Cert-ificate on his own expenses as per the circukirs dated 24.12.1998 & 1.3.1999 ond further whether he has besen paid two advancs increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge Subhash