< In the Hon'ble Hieh Court ofJudicature of Chhattisearh at BUasuur fC.G.) , W.P^O. ^^a.s|2006 C^/ a^. Petitioner -^- Santosh Kumar Patil, aged 46 years, Son of Shri Sunder Lal Patil, .-•"'^..••'* Assistant Teacher, Govt.Primary School, •^.^r"11?-'"",..-"* Village- Kuthrel, Block, Tahsil & District "£^*"-(>'..--"" Durg-(C.G.) w" .<?v- <(S (-^.'.••' ^ ^%^-- ..;.;•: •r>^..> '^^" i^ Resnondents ..^... fv^ff '^b < -^- VERSUS -1. o^ The State Govemment of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department Mmistry, . D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ,3.. District Education OfRcer, Durg . ,3. Block Education OfGcer, 13 vA^ , Disfa-ictDurg (C.G.) Writ Petition Under Articles 226/227 of The Constitution Oflndia for the issuance of WRIT in the nature ofMANDAMUS certiorari, Prohibition and for other suitable writ or writs, order or orders, direction or directions. XI-HC-78 3n^!T?iTR-li+ gsir 3T1^5T sbt<i«ti *<l<TpTTSh*1T^» 'jvt -^ww^, ®Tn<-i'i<o,Rt<'iiyy ***»*"** t ^ •***•*••»**** 200^ 3TT^?T4ach (yt^cl<^'ST) siarar flf^cT sn^r 1-9-2006 Mr, Somkant Verma, couns| tiioffi'n-i HiinT ff te^t <R]«|< ^311^'ITSn^T el for the petitioner. Miss Deepali Pandey, Pa^el Lawyer for the State/respondents, on advance copy. Heard. The case of the petitione^ is that he is working as Assistant Teacher and as per the Instruction datefl 24-12-98 issued by the State of M.P., the Assistant Teachers who have p^ssed B.T.1., B.Ed. and M.Ed. exominflrt'ion on their own expenses after 22-10-|i The petitioner passed the B.T.I. and copy of the mark sheet to ^ hos not been 9iven the benefit, i|ifhereas, similar'ly situated persons have been 64 are entitled for two advance increments. examination on his own cost in the year 1992 int effect is Annexure P-1, but the petitioner granted two advance increments Court. Having heard learned coun and circumstances of the case. w a copy of this petition and i^ No.2 is directed to examine th^ averments made by the peti1 similarly situated persons hav under the orders of the Tribuna! and this i^el for the parties, having regard to the facts jithout expressing any opinion on the mer-it of the ccse, the petitioner is allowe(p to make a detailed representotion along with s annexures raising all her 9rievances to respondent No.2 within a period <^f 15 dcys from todoy and in turn, respondent case of the petitioner in the light of the (•ioner in this writ petition and in the representation also. If respor|dent No.2 reaches to the conclusion thot ^ been granted benefit of two advance increments ond the petitioner's lipae 'is also covered for grant of two advance increments on the basis of 6overr|nient's order, then respondent No.2 sholl pass P.T.O. XI-HC-78 sn^rw R-fi* (rarsnwsbiif Soma ^ v *imwi sh*ii«*» 3'sr •^I'^IMI, »Tfly'i6,fsjcii+iy . tJ..<P^-7^<2, ^200^' OT^T'ra^? (yit^°lt<'iT) srarw (rfN an^r or-der on the r'epresentation of tl^. the date of its receipt, in accordcjnce With the directions afore^oid, Parties are entitled for cej-tified qillTcl'ifl-l WivK if fS^S <R|WI< ^;3Tf^IT3TI^T e petitioner within a period of 3 months from with law. oid, the petition stands disposed of. copy of this order. - L.C.Bhadoo Judge P.T.O.