%6t6^ /^'" HIQH COURT OF CHHATT1SQARH: BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 3042 of 2008 Petitioners 1) ^Smt. Ritu Shrivastava, w/o. .Shri Rajesh Shrivastava, aged about 39 years, Assistant Teaoher Govt. MulSipurpose -f.3. Schooi- Ambikapur, Dlstt. Suiguja (CG). Versus 1) State of Clihattisgarh, through the Sasretary, Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur 2) Dirsctor, Public Instruction, Chhattisgarli, Oovt. Raipur. - 3) District Education Offioer, Distt. Suiguja (CG). (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) SB: Hon'bte Mr. Saflsh K.Agnthotrl, J. Respondents Presenfc Shri A.S. Rajput, counse! for the petitioner. Shri Alok Bakshi, Govt. Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 20th day of .June, 2008) With consent of Searned counsel appearing for both the parties, the matter is heard finally. 2) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitloner submit that the petitioner is working as Assistant Tescher in Govt; Multipurpose, Higher Secondary School, Ambikapur, Distt Surguja (CG). TTie petitioner has obtained B.Ed. degree after joining service on her own expenses, Therefore, the petitioner is entttled two advance increments in the iight ofjudgment and order passed in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Gorporation, Durg and another (2006 (li) MPJR-CG 96). In spite of representation dated 30-4-2007 (Annexure P/6), the Government has not taken any steps and has deprived the petitioner from legal benefits. 3) Shri Alok Bakshi, fearned Govt. Advocate appearing for the State submits that the representation as stated above, shall be considered expedittously, as eariy as possible, preferably within a period offour weeks. 4) ln the llght of above submission made by learned Govt Advocate, this petition is disposed of. Sd/- Satish K; Agnihotri Judge ' ,'' f