IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 8848 of 1995 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- KIRITKUMAR JAGANNATH PANDYA Versus DISTRICT & SESSION JUDGE -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR PK JANI for Petitioner MR.S.N.SHELAT, ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL WITH MR DA BAMBHANIA for respondent No.1 SERVED for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI Date of decision: 11/03/96 ORAL JUDGEMENT The grievance of the petitioner is that though on 12th January, 1993 he had applied for the post of Gujarati Stenographer Grade II to the District Judge, Mehsana pursuant to an advertisement which was issued on 9.1.1993, nothing was done in the context of the application. The petitioner has, in a belated petition, prayed for a direction to give appointment to him. The petitioner has not approached the District Judge to know the outcome of his application. The District Judge, Mehsana is directed to inform the petitioner about the outcome of his application dated 12.1.1993 within two weeks of the receipt of the writ of this order. The petitioner cannot claim an appointment as Stenographer Grade II straight away in a writ petition without undergoing the procedure of recruitment applicable to that post. This petition is therefore rejected. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. -----