IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM TUESDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2011 / 21ST POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 37561 of 2010(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- K.RAVINDRAN, S/O.KUNHIRAMAN NAIR, AGED 50 YEARS, KARINKATTATH VEEDU, ORAVIL, NADUVANNUR (GUARANTOR). BY ADV. SRI.V.N.RAMESAN NAMBISAN RESPONDENTS: -------------------- 1. THE CHIEF MANAGER, KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, PAVASMANI ROAD, KOZHIKODE - 1. 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, KOZHIKODE BRANCH, KOZHIKODE - 1. BY STANDING COUNSEL, SRI.R.S.KALKURA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: VK C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J --------------------------------------- W.P(C) No.37561 of 2010-U ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of January, 2011. J U D G M E N T Challenge in this writ petition is against Ext.P1 demand notice issued by the 1st respondent. It is evident that the petitioner had defaulted repayment of a loan availed from the respondents, and through Ext.P1 the petitioner was requested to clear payment of the arrears. The main dispute raised by the petitioner is regarding correctness of the amount in demand. 2. I am of the opinion that issue could not be adjudicated in a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner will be at liberty to seek appropriate steps to resolve such dispute. It is also made clear that the petitioner will be at liberty to challenge further coercive steps, if any taken. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of without prejudice to rights of the petitioner as stated above. Sd/- C.K.ABDUL REHIM JUDGE //True Copy// ab P.A to Judge