IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.36318 of 2011 1. Ameer Ahmad, son of Late Hakim Latifur Rahman @ late Latifur Rahman, resident of village – Beni Bari (Bijhara), P.S. – Kadwa (Balia- Belon), District – Katihar. 2. Moulvi Shahjahan @ Md. Shahjahan, son of Naimuddin, resident of village – Chowki Mohna, P.S. – Kadwa, District – Katihar. ---------- Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar -----Opposite Party ******** 02/- 15/11/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with Kadwa (Balia-Belon) P.S. Case No. 85/2011 for offences under Sections 452/448/342/380 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code, are named accused in this case. However, as submitted, petitioner no. 1 is now no more in the world. Hence, application to his extent has become infructuous. Accordingly, this application stands disposed of as having become infructuous with respect to petitioner no.1. So far as petitioner no. 2 is concerned, being one of the in-laws he also named accused and carries allegation of simple assault to the informant in a petty matrimonial dispute, which has now been resolved and accordingly petition of compromise has been filed. If, it is so, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of informant appearing before the court below supporting contents of compromise with his free-will and consent without any coercion and also stood bailors, and in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, in connection with Kadwa (Balia-Belon) P.S. Case No. 85/2011, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Rajeev/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)