Civil Revision No. 5785 of 2009 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 5785 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 08, 2009 Tarsem and another ...... Appellants Versus Nihal Kaur and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr. Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioners. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. This petition has been filed against the order declining amendment of plaint. The petitioners have earlier filed suit claiming that they had become owners by adverse possession in the year 1991. After 18 years an application was filed under Order 6 Rule 17 read with Section 151 CPC praying that the relief of declaration be now amended under the Punjab Occupancy Tenants (Vesting of Proprietary Rights) Act, 1952. The learned trial Court declined it on the ground of having been filed at a very belated stage as also the ground that by the proposed amendment the very nature of the suit would change. In my opinion there is no material irregularity which can justify interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Civil Revision No. 5785 of 2009 (O&M) Consequently this revision is dismissed. Since the main case has been decided, the pending Civil Misc. Applications, if any, stand disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE October 08, 2009 sunita