IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYNA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 26250 of 2010 Date of decision:14.9.2010 Tarsem Lal and others Petitioner vs. State of Punjab and another Respondent Present: Mr. DS Pheruman, Advocate. M.M.S.BEDI,J. Learned counsel for the petitioners has not pressed the petition for quashing of the FIR but seeks liberty to raise all these points at an opportune time. A request has also been made that petitioners 3 and 4, who are ladies, their personal appearance may be exempted. The petition is disposed of with a direction that in case petitioners No. 3 & 4 move an application for exemption from personal appearance before the trial court, the trial court, taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, may exempt the personal appearance subject to any condition imposed upon petitioners 3 and 4. In case the personal appearance is exempted, it will be open to the trial court to record the evidence as per the provisions of Section 273 Cr.P.C. in presence of the counsel for the petitioners No. 3 & 4. September 14 ,2010 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE