-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 255 OF 2009 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 776 OF 2009 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 774 OF 2008 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 124 OF 2007 IN EX PARTE AWARD DATED 13TH FEBRUARY, 2007. Paresh Choudhary ... Appellant versus Mahesh Advanie .... Respondent Ms. Sunita R. Tiwari for the appellant. Mr. Hakim Salim A.R. for the respondent. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & R.C. CHAVAN, JJ. DATE: NOVEMBER 05, 2009. P.C. It is pointed out by the learned advocates appearing in the matter that the appellant and the respondent have settled their disputes and placed on record consent terms along with the Memorandum of Understanding duly signed by the parties and their advocates. The same are taken on record and marked “X” and “X-1” for identification. Appeal and the Notice of Motion are accordingly disposed in view of the consent terms. The award of the Arbitrator dated 13th February, 2007 stands satisfied in view of the said consent terms. In -2- view of the above, the execution proceedings before the learned single Judge also stands terminated. 2. In view of the aforesaid order, the Sheriff of Mumbai is directed to raise the attachment of the property in accordance with law. It is agreed by the learned advocates before us that the poundage charges will be shared equally by the appellant and the respondent. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. R.C. CHAVAN, J.