IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3397 of 2010 AMARNATH THAKUR son of Late Arjun Thakur resident of village- Katka, P.S.- Singhawara, District- Darbhanga. …. Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Rana Awadhesh, Commissioner, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga. 3. Pran Mohan Thakur, District Magistrate, Darbhanga. 4. Sri Shyam Nandan Pandey, Executive Engineer, P.W.D., Darbhanga. Division, Darbhanga. … Respondent/contemnor/opposite parties. ----------- 2. 01.09.2010 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State, this Court is satisfied that no contempt is made out inasmuch as an earlier application for contempt filed by the petitioner, MJC No. 2109 of 2009 was dismissed by an order dated 23.6.2010 holding that the order of this Court dated 11.2.2009 in CWJC No. 2081 of 2009 had been complied in letter and spirit. Let it be noted that only direction given in the order dated 11.2.2009 in CWJC No. 2081 of 2009 was to dispose of a representation filed by the petitioner and that was admittedly done as is recorded in the subsequent order of this Court dated 23.6.2010 in MJC No. 2109 of 2009. Counsel for the petitioner, however, would submit that such order was passed without holding any enquiry. In the 2 opinion of this Court, that cannot be gone into in contempt jurisdiction inasmuch as there was no order of this Court to pass such order after holding an enquiry. The simple direction of this Court was to dispose of the representation of the petitioner and that has been done. In that view of the matter, this application in fact is a second application on the same subject and is fit to be dismissed with exemplary cost but then taking into account that the petitioner was not represented in the earlier proceedings, this Court would for the time being not impose cost. This application is, accordingly, dismissed. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)