IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32965 of 2009 PAWAN KUMAR @ PAWAN CHAUHAN @ PAWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 11-11-2009 Heard. Petitioner’s earlier prayer for bail was dismissed by order contained in Annexure-1, which contains the factual details of the case. There is no new facts and circumstances which could be the basis for renewal of the prayer for bail except that in spite of being in custody since 14.08.2007, the charges have not yet been framed. Considering the nature of the allegation, I am not inclined to release the above named petitioner on bail. Petition is dismissed. However, I direct the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Patna to consider that the petitioner is in custody without trial so much so that even the charges have not been framed. The court should look into the record and ensure expeditious disposal of the trial. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J ) BTiwary/