IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16588 of 2010 MANOJ SINGH . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2/ 17/05/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The defence in a police case under Sections-395 and 397 of Indian Penal Code is that the F.I.R. is against unknown, no T.I.P. or recovery when co-accused Lalan Paswan who allegedly named him in his confession has himself been enlarged on bail in Cr. Misc. No.23571/09. Learned counsel for the State points out that the petitioner appears to be having antecedent of at least three cases. The allegations are of bank dacoity by persons riding motorcycles. Considering the grant of bail to co-accused Lalan Paswan who named the petitioner and the antecedents of the petitioner himself let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Aurai P.S. Case No.44/08. Both the sureties must be his father and wife respectively whose photograph and proof of residence shall - 2 - be appended to the bail-bonds to be verified by the court below before enlarging him on bail. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)