FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of | coram, appearance, court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders | CONTEMPT PETITION NO.246/2007 Shri D.G.Nagode,Adv.for petitioners. Shri S.P.Deshmukh,Adv.for R.1. Shri S.K.Kadam, AGP for State. .... CORAM : R.K.DESHPANDE,J. DATE : 01/12/2009. 1] This petition complains about wilful disobedience of the order dated 23/6/06 passed by this Court on Civil Application No.5345/06 in Second Appeal No.451/06. 2] This Court had granted ad- interim relief in terms of prayer clause A of the application till the next date. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, in view of the order of stay, the possession of the petitioner over the suit land was protected and the same could not have been disturbed. What is being urged by the petitioner, is that he was present on 27/6/2006 between 1 p.m. to 1.15 p.m. when the panchanama was drawn on 27/6/2006. At that time, he had pointed out that this Court had passed order of status quo, however, inspite of it, the respondents have shown that the order was received at 4 p.m. on 27/6/2006 as per the receipt at Exh.C. The learned counsel therefore, submits that this is in clear violation of the interim order passed by this Court. 3] The learned counsel may be right in urging that at the time of drawing panchanama, which took place on 27/6/2006 between 1 p.m. to 1.15 p.m., he had brought the order passed by this Court to the notice of concerned authorities and that it would not happen that inspite of getting the order from the Court, he shall not deliver it to the respondents when the protection granted by this order had to be taken. However, ultimately Second Appeal No.451/06 was dismissed by this Court on 6/2/2007 confirming the decree passed by first appellate Court. Copy of this order dated 6/3/2007 dismissing the Second Appeal is placed on record and marked as X for identification. In view of this, I do not find any reason to proceed further with the matter. The Contempt Petition is therefore, dismissed. No costs. (R.K.DESHPANDE, J.) umg/cp246-07