HIEH CGURT OF CHHATTI5GARH AT BILAia'PUR Misc,Aga§ea! N9.&O§ 0f EOO&. Ashowsh Beyeezn, aged ubou‘r 21 yams, residgn‘r of f).N.K. Colany, Namyanpur, Disfi‘Jagdalpur (C.6.) Vensus 1.; Rasgenéem Mahaveer Jain son of 5hr§ Sham? La! join, aged a‘muf 4%“ years, residen? of Naraympur, I Vehicie owner; DisftJagéaiwr (6.5.) 2. Th5 Grimm! Insurcm-sa Campuny Limifed, Sadar Bazar Jagdaipur, Dis'i'i“.Bas’rar- (42.6.) {Appmi undar 5mm)?! 173 of 11w Mo'ror Vehiclas Ac?) (5B: Han'bla Mr.T.P. 5h§4rmaJ3 Phase-M: MnA‘N’ghakmg mun5g§ far the apgalkmf. MnVikas S‘nrivusmva, ceunsei for respondem‘ No.1 Mr'Sueihir Agmwal, counsei far mspoMenf No.2. ORDER (Passed on 3a“ June, 2010) 1. By Th§s @pmi, ‘ma uppeHam’ has cha}§enge-d fhe. iegalify <§ pmwigfy af #he arder dated 232.20% passed by ‘rhe &cond Adéifiami Claims Tribunai, Jagdaipur (for Show ’Ciaims Tribuna") in MiscM-JE N&1f2096 whereby me Chims Tribunal has dismissad *he application fHed by ‘rhe appdiam‘ far safring asgde ihe arder da‘md 20.12.2005 an thz ground ¢f nan—aggeamnm of fha pay-fies. 2. As per appaai and Hag arder impugned, stains pefific-r} Na.117!2003 was -, gmnding before fhe. Ciaims TriEuml, Jagdaipur. 0n 20112.2()05‘ in The awe-nee of ‘I’he apgeilant and his coungai, ciaim pafi'tion was dismisséd. Resirom-rian applicarion was fi¥ed and ‘the same. was alsa dismisséd by fhe. Ciaims Tribuml, by *he Qrder‘ imgugned. A ‘ t“. . I ham heard legrngd counseE far ‘Ihe pita-figs, tyerused the nrder- impugned and record of the, Ciaims; Tribunal‘ @ _l~ Laamed mange! far- ‘the apyeiiam submi‘w #Mf an acwum 9f mnass of Tim caunsgi, caunse! was m? prasan‘r before fhe Chin‘s Tribuml and EH‘nms of tha counsek in firm pmesen'f mag, is sufficien? muse far racaiiing the cmer m‘ dismissal, bu? firm Chims Tribunai has m? considared fhe same” On me ofhar hand, immed ceunse! far the mspanden‘ts suppnrted fine arder impugned. . Fmm parusa! 0f ‘rha order- 5mpugned, it agapears "ma? munse‘ far the apgeiian? was ili and was ncw preaem.‘ in ‘rhe Cam-r when fhe-cage. ws (sailed for hearing, In we of"‘a§aim’ an accgun? af m'mr acaidem, swig? @{gEca‘tian ef previsians of fha ‘éode of CM‘ Procadura is m? required. Pravisims reia‘tmg m ciaim are. banzficiai kgisinfimz m pmvide ndequafe comganmtic-n fa The vicfim of fhe mom!“ accident The QnEms Tribumis are required To fake leMen'!’ View and pasitive apgmccah when deciding ‘rhe, ma? dispu-ra insfaad ef deciding the. pe'ritim an mo fechnicai graunds. In The pmsem casa, iliness 9f “the. cauniha! was sufficigm’ causa. for reaamng The. ordar of dismissaL Whiig dismissing the appiicafim for recmling The ardgr, tha Chims Tribunai hag cammimd iiéegaiify. Order imgaugnad is m? susfaimble undar ‘rhe iaw. Ccnsequan'riy, the appeai is albwed. Ordar imgugnaé is. hamby s23? aside. Clam! Paéfian No.117IZOO3 filed on behalf 0f ‘Phe appeHan‘t is ms'mrad in its arigim§ numbar. The par‘ries are direcmd 1'0 ramain preszn‘r before fhe 5acond Adciitima§ Chims Tribunal}, Jagcicsigzmr an 1&$.2€§3G far ‘ Sd/_ K furfher prnceedings of ”the. msa. 1 T.P. Sharma ,r : ; Judge i .