Ladda 1 caw-1679-10.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION No. 1679 OF 2011. IN WRIT PETITION No. 1691 of 2010. Sunanda Wd/o Devram Arde ...Petitioner./Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents. ...... Ms Leela D. Malu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr R.M. Patne, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondents. CORAM: RANJIT MORE, J. DATED:- 18th August, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. The civil application is taken out for restoration of the above said writ petition. The petition was dismissed, in default, Ladda 2 caw-1679-10.doc even prior to issuance of notice to the respondents. Therefore, presence of the respondents, in my opinion, is not necessary for the purpose of disposal of the present civil application. The applicant has given reasons in paragraph Nos. 2, 3 and 4 of the application. The reasons, in my view, are sufficient to restore the writ petition to its original number. Civil application is accordingly allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Civil application is accordingly disposed of. (RANJIT MORE, J.)