ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 438 OF 2008 OF MOTION NO. 438 OF 2008 OF MOTION NO. 438 OF 2008 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL (LODGING) NO.38 OF 2008 (LODGING) NO.38 OF 2008 (LODGING) NO.38 OF 2008 IN IN IN ARBITRATION ARBITRATION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.303 OF 2005 PETITION NO.303 OF 2005 PETITION NO.303 OF 2005 Dhansukh K.Shetia ...Appellant. (Orig.Petitioner) Versus Rajchandra Capital Services Pvt. Ltd. ...Respondent. (Orig.Respondent) Mr.Jayant Gaikwad i/by Ajay Kandahar & Co. for the Appellant. Mr.A.A.Mukri i/by M/s. Purohit & Co. for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.B.MHASE & : S.B.MHASE & : S.B.MHASE & R.V.MORE, R.V.MORE, R.V.MORE, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 19TH SEPTEMBER, 2008 : 19TH SEPTEMBER, 2008 : 19TH SEPTEMBER, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard both the sides. 2. This is a Notice of Motion for condoning the delay of 13 days in filing the Appeal. Though the Notice of Motion is opposed by the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent, for the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of Notice of Motion, we find that there is a ( 2 ) sufficient cause for condonation of delay. The delay is condoned. Office is directed to number the Appeal and process it for admission. 3. The Notice of Motion is disposed of, accordingly. (R.V.MORE, (R.V.MORE, (R.V.MORE, J.) J.) J.) (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, J.) J.) J.)