......^5^- •n..-" cW^-'"'\<<> )..7.s" -'•»• ^ ^) •A^%- ^y}-^" ^<-.Ri»-T)aEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR.IC©) Q PETITIONER ^> WRIT PETITION N0./J^/ ^ ^^^^^^^/2006 Smt. Lalita Murum, aged about 30 years, wife of Shri Zeral, (member of tribal community) oceupation Sah Sahayeeka, Angan Badi Nutrition and Food Disb-ibution Centre, Kandakhar, Gram Panchayat Maharajganj, Block Balrampur, Tah. Paal, District Surguja (C.G.) y RESPONDENTS /-"1. VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Departraent of Women and Child Development, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Union of India, through Ministry of Women and ChUd Welfare, New Dehli. The District CoUector, Raigarh (C.G.) , 4. ^ District Women and Child Wetfare olficer; Distt. Surguja (CG) 5. Chief Executive Of&cer, Janpad Panchayat - Balrampur, Distt. Surguja (C.G) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, XI-HC-22 sn^iw 1^R;3D^I sti^i^^rf^ :;a-J5»!!«Ei3»SSsi^{.;,.»..^^^ S^?is<|«i®*SS®®;%E.'%®£ T^ -^WM^, rfTfly'i<o. r»«ii'«3< sn^r •qsra? '.,.../..3S./... •mwffwqra;-^'*"'-'"-^'"""-"'"^ 200 ^ "fq^V" 64 31T^T?'(giW^fef ^raferiN 'qn?ff tf fttzt TfSngr ^3)P<ra sii^i 19.04.2006 Shri Prafull Bharat, Advocat^ appears on behalf of Shri A.N. Bhakta, counsel forthe petitioners in VV.P.Nos. 1329/06, 1330/06, 1331/06 1332/06, 1005/06 and 1006/06. | Shri Prafull Bharat, counsel for]the petitioner in W.P.No. 1425/06. Shri S.K. Beriwal. counsel for Union of India. Shri U.N.S. Deo, G.A. with A.SI.Kachhawaha, P.L. forthe State and its authorities. We have heard learned counsf] Bythese petitions ths main gri are present'y 'rvorking as Sahsahika i[|i the rural areas of District - Sarguja for the purposes 6f distribution of forthe parties. svance raised by the petitioners who upplementary nutrition, is that vide notification dated 19.01.2006 issued ijiythe State Government prefereritial treatment has been provided for Aanganwadi workers to the persons on the post of.Sahsahika whereas tl'je petitioners who are working in the rural areas have not been given simil^rtreatment. . Notices of these petitions we^ response to the said notices reply he|s been filed on behalf of the State in which ithas been mentionedthat vi<i dated 19.01.2006 has been superseci&d vide notific.ation dated 10.04.2006 bywhich it has been made cleartha who are workirig in therural as well the appointment on the post of wt'o are workina in the urban areas e issued to the resporidents and in e order dated 10.04.2006, the order now in the virfiole State Sahsahikas |as in the urban areas shail be given preferential treatroent for the appoiititment of Aanganwadi Karyakarta if they are otherwise eligib'e for the saii(l post. [1ft3'?T'<g^l XI-HC-22 T53 "'ll'Mldl. »Tilt1'l®,f'Ktl'dy BS 3n^?r ira^ HW\< thqra) "WI, 200 fafccyil' <RI^['^I h-u* s^i Sh^\^ ^TQ^ sn^i ?(<nwaf?g ^ ^ .^ .& 1;< 1.S!S';S Learned counsel fort^ie parti^s submit that in view of this order of supersession griev,fi(i^e.,fl{,l^,e petitio(iers stands vindicated. Now, in viewpfabove, nothinfa remains to be ^iecided in these writ petition^rs has already been attended to and having become infructuous and the icated. Sd/- petitions as grievance ofthe as such the petitions are disposed o stay granted on 30.03.2006 standsvi Sd/- L.C. Bhacioo Judge t)i<iiCT<ili »<i4ni^ fciat <fat<;lt ^aiPdHSfI^l Dhirendra Mishra Judge [Tt*^-ii ^^c ^