Criminal Revision No. 566 of 1991 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. Criminal Revision No. 566 of 1991 Date of Decision: 30.01.2008. Bal Kishan Bansal …Petitioner Versus Dwarka Nath and Others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Kapil Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondents. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) In a complaint filed by the petitioner, the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ambala, summoned six accused on 26.9.1986. Out of six accused, one accused namely, Dwarka Nath, filed a revision petition in the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Ambala. The said revision petition was accepted by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ambala, on 11.6.1991. Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ambala, has specifically stated that impugned order of summoning is set aside only qua Dwarka Nath and the trial shall proceed against the other co- accused. Occurrence pertains to year 1982. Trial qua other accused ought to have been concluded. Criminal Revision No. 566 of 1991 2 Accepting the revision petition of Dwarka Nath, the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, has observed pendency of civil proceedings between the parties. Be as it may, there is no justification to set aside order whereby respondent was discharged after 26 years years of the occurrence especially when co-accused have already faced the trial. Even otherwise, finding of learned Additional Sessions Judge regarding the role of Dwarka Nath is just and need not to be disturbed. Dismissed. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge January 30, 2008 “DK”