C^~ L^T2T7 ^ INTHEHIGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGABH ATBILASPUR PETITIONER \<=?.. ^^•y' ..•^y SPONDENTS i^f^^^_ s-^^ \Vrit Petition_(S) No, :of2010 Ghanshyam Yadu, Age 42 year S/o Shri Rameshwar Yadu Occupation-Panchayat Secretary at Village Panchayat Sajapali R/o Village Ranipartewa Block-Chhura, Tahsil Chhura District-Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1 State of Chhattisgarh Through the Principal Secretary Panchayat 85 Rural Development .^, — ._--__- •••'"' ^ Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) ^2. The Gollector, Districf Raipur (C.G.) ./ 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Panchayat, Raipur (C.G.) A. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat-Chhura, District- Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITIONUNDERARTICLE 226 QF THE CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA p ;-.»»8, HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.5713 OF 2010 PETITIONER Ghanshyam Yadu Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others n <t-^?u J RESPONDENTS (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri J.N. Nande, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Deputy Advocate General with Shri N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. QRDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 18 dayofJanuary, 2011) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the ' petitioner does not want press this petition on merits at this stage. However, the respondent authorities may be directed to consider the pending representation dated 22-09-2010 (Annexure P/2) ofthe petitioner. Without expressing any opinion on the merits ofthe case, the Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Raipur is directed to consider and decide the representation dated 22/09/2010 (Annexure P/2) and pass appropriate order, in accordance with law as early as possible preferably within a period offour weeks. Accordingly, the writ petitionis disposed of. ---——— - Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Arun