HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, AT NAINITAL Civil Contempt Petition No. 248 of 2004 Narayan Muni. ….Petitioner Versus Prahlad Singh Rawat & Others …..Respondents Mr. D. Barthwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Sharad Sharma, Advocate for respondent no. 3. JUDGMENT Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. The learned counsel for respondent no. 3 submitted that the contempt petition is not maintainable as the petitioner has a right to file an appeal against the order passed by the Municipal Board mutating the name of respondent no. 3. On this, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this contempt petition with liberty to file an appeal or seek any other suitable remedy before the competent court. 2. Permission granted. 3. In view of the above, the contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. However, it is made clear that while filing the appeal before the competent authority/court, it will take into consideration the pendency of this contempt petition filed before this Court. (J.C.S. RAWAT, J.) Dated 22.05.2008 V.K.