f^?' e^^- F "r'ar^ m THE HON'BLE fflGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. °,5°-3 / ® PETITIONER VERSUS Smt. VINOD BAI MANDAVI W/o Shri. D.L.Mandavi Housewife, aged about 29 years, Residing at: Rly. Qr. No. 94/C, Zone-1, Rail Nagar, BMY-Charoda, District: Durg (CG) RESPONDENTS i>^CL^\/ ^n^A/ .. ^'y i'S"'^.'^--'' •'S.i' .t? 't^s-' .„<••• ,-y'" </ <''.'''^../ 'y 2. 3, ^D ^CH^?M&-< '^ • r'":---'- ".-..<., '-. -ti^i'JTiS"^''"1 Through : The General Manager, South East Central Railway, Bilaspur Zone, G.M.Office, BILASPUR- 495001 (CG) The Divisional Railway Manager, South East Central Railway, Raipur Division, RATPUR - 492001 The Sr. Divil. Personnel Officer, South East Central Raiiway; Raipur Division, RAIPUR - 492001 The Divisional Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force, S.E.C.Railway, Raipur Division, RAIPLIR-492001. The Commandant, Railway Protection Force, (Raipur Circle), RAIPLIR- 492001. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^T' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Sl N0.3905 OF 2009 PETITIONER Smt. Vinod Bai Mandavi RESPONDENTS Versus Union of India and othere (Writ petition uncter Articles 226 of ttie Constitution of India) Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: - Shri K. R. Nair, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Abhishek Sinha, counsel for respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 09'" day of November, 2009) With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, ttie petition is heard finally. (2) Learned counsel appearing for the respondente/Railways submte that the prayer made in this petition is to direct the respondents to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 01-11-2008, 10-(»-2009 and 07-07-2009 regarding grant of family pension and other service benefits. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the respondent authorities will consider the aforestated pending representations ofttie petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance w'rth law, on its own perspective, within a period of six weeks. (3) In view of foregoing, according to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. (4) Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge Tumane