IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.2701 of 2010 Date of Decision : February 16, 2010. Rajwinder Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Dr.M.L.Sachdeva, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner was selected and appointed as ETT Teacher vide order dated 27.9.2008 (Annexure P-3). Thereafter, vide memo dated 11.1.2009 (Annexure P-5), he was asked to submit the relevant document before the District Education Officer (Elementary Education), Jalandhar but he could not submit those documents for the reason that he was behind the bars in the murder case of his own father. The petitioner was acquitted in the above-stated case vide order dated 1.7.2009 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalandhar and thereafter he represented respondent No.2 on 20.7.2009 (Annexure P-6) to grant extension and permit him to submit the C.W.P.No .2701 of 2010 2 documents and allow him to join his duties. However, no decision has been taken on his representation by the authorities so far. In these circumstances and without expressing any views on the petitioner's entitlement to join his duties, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to respondent No.2 to take cognizance of the representation dated 20.7.2009 (Annexure P-6) and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order in accordance with law and the Government Policy, as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 16-02-2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE