IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.20673 of 2010 Umesh Arya, son of Deosharan Arya, resident of village Kursela, P.S. Kursela, District Katihar…………………………………………………………..…..Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The District Magistrate, Katihar. 3. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Katihar. 4. The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Katihar. 5. The District Transport Officer, Katihar. 6. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Katihar. 7. The Block Development Officer, Korha, Katihar……………………………………………………..……….Respondents ----------- 2 17.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that though he has been suspended and the proceeding has been initiated against him but during the pendency of the proceeding, subsistence allowance is not being paid to him. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that if the petitioner reports at the Headquarter which has been fixed for his suspension period, he will be paid his subsistence allowance. In the circumstances, the writ application is disposed of with a direction to the respondents that if the petitioner reports at the Headquarter 2 fixed, he shall be paid his due subsistence allowance and shall be paid further subsistence allowance on month-to- month basis till the proceeding is finally concluded. Respondents are also directed to proceed with the departmental proceeding and make all endeavours to dispose of the same within three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)