*^-" ^•^w^^.^%-''. ^>(es da A-""'" " re?zs-7 .'/--' INTHEraGHCOURTOFJUDICATLrREQRGHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ PetitiQni .1 NQ. SS?'i> / 2010 i PETITIQNER E)utari , Bai 8/0 Indram NinnaIKar, Aged about 46 years, Sarpaneh, Gram PancUayat Mohfara, BlocK & Tehsil Baloda: Bazar, District Raipui- (C.G.) RESPONDENTS VERSU&: . ' ' . 1) DeomatlW/0 Khuman Sahu 2) Qiribai W/Q Keshram -. ; 3} ..Ranak'Prabhg.'W/oAmritBharti 4) BCidhni Bat W/o Deoeharan Sahu 5) .MaJieshwariW/o Dinesh Sahu 6) ?Mirabai;W/o Hanuman Sham-ia 7) Sunita S/ Q Malik Raril Mahilange All are resident of^^^^^^^^V^ 'Mohtaira, BloCk Baloda Bazar, . .DistrietRaipur-(e.Gr.)K ., • 8) Gangt.KRam Sahu'Upper Division Teaclier Govemlnertt ^Higher Secondary Sehool Rohanshi, ^ L moc^ 8s Tahsil^^^^^^^:^ •.•Rmpur:.(C.0J';,'1,^ ;''^' :::,':1:;;^ ^ Mantr^jii Vernla ^ Teacher,- Goverrim School, Sitapar, BlQG^ '& Tahsil Palari, ©istricfRaipur(C.G.) ; 1Q) Anupara' ^ ^ShuMa;^^^^^- R^ •/OffiGer/ Ta&siIda^^Tffisa^a]^^ , :.Bazgr,,pistnct:RsiRur:(C,G.) " .^ 11) A.P. Shandilya Chief Executive Officer, Janpand Panchayat Baloda Bazar, District Raipur (C.G.) . 12) Sub Divisional Officer, (Revenue ) Baloda Bazar, Distt Raipur (C.G.) 13) State of Chhattisgarh Through .Secretary, Panchayat 8s Rural Development Qepartment, D.K.S? Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) | WRrTPEnTIONXJNDERARTICLE 226/227 GPTHE CQNSTITUTIONOF INDIA ; .-!3!k <0 s- HiGU COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BtLASPUR WRIT PETmON(e<N0.5S530F2010 Petitioner Vereus ResDondents Dulari Bai Deomati&Othsrs WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OFTHE GONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^.;~.: -:. :' .•'.:' '. .' ..' .'.'-':[.' '.'.•':. ' '/: : '; •' •. -. .'..•'. . ." .' ^SB: Hon'bleMr.Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:-ShriyivekRathore.Advocateforthepetitioner. ' * ShnDeepaK3ain,^v(x^efbrtherespohdentNo,1/cayeator. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyerfor theState. ORDERIORAU (Passedofi27tlldayofSeptember,2010) 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 16.09.2010 (Annexure ^ P/t) passed by the Sub Dhftsional OTficer (Revenue) Bafoda Bazar, in an electiori petition filed by the respondent No. 1, whereby reeounting of votes for the election of Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Mohtara, Block & Tahsjl Baloda Bazeir, District Raipur, has beenordered. 2. The main^ontentiqn ofthe petitioner is thattRe election petition has been decided without framing jssues and examination of facts and witnesses. Thus, the impugned order is itlegal and unjust being violative of the procedyre as enshrined under the provisfons ofthe Chhattisgarh PanGhsiyats (Election Petition, Gorrupt Practices & Disqualification for Membership) Rules, 1995 (for short ° e Ryfes, 1995^. • , : : ',: - - • .' : - 3. Shri DeepaR Jain, leamed eounsel appearing for the election petitioner (respondent No. 1 herein) 'submits that admittedly, the ashok .2 ;. • . ' . • : . :" defect, as aforestated has crept in the jmpugned oreler. Thus, the mattermayberemittectbaeKtoconsiderafreshinaccordancewlththe Rules, 1995 andtheorderdated 31/08/2010, passedbythisCourtih BalaramRatljQrev.StateofGhhat6sgarf) & Others1. 4. Leamed counsel appearing fbr the parties submit that it would be proper if the Election Tribunaf considers the case afresh tn accordancewith law. 5. In view of foregojng, the order dated 16.09.2010 (Annexure P/1) is quashed. The matter is remitfed back to the Tribuhal to restore to fts file and decide the case afresh, as early as possible, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six weeKs. 6. Accordingly,the writpetitionis disposedof. Noorderasfocosts. M^-y *>"".<udSe Biotri -n- 1 W.P.(C) N0. 3573 of 2010 iiS;^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^