IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 4TH OCTOBER 2010 / 12TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 30422 of 2010(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- 1. GLORY ABRAHAM, AGED 34 YEARS, D/O.ABRAHAM, KAPPIKKUZHICHALIL HOUSE, KEEZHILLAM KARA, RAYAMANGALAM VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK. 2. BLOSENT ABRAHAM, AGED 28 YEARS, D/O.ABRAHAM, KAPPIKKUZHICHALIL HOUSE, KEEZHILLAM KARA, RAYAMANGALAM VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.K.SUNILKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, KAKKANADU, ERNAKULAM-682 030. 2. THE SPECIAL TAHASILDAR, LAND ASSIGNMENT, PERUMBAVOOR-683 542. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KUNNATHUNADU-683 542. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, RAYAMANGALAM-683 542. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 30422 OF 2010 (C) ===================== Dated this the 4th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T According to the petitioners, their father was in possession of 2.12 acres of land. However, when Ext.P1 patta was issued, assignment was only in respect of 1.12 acres. It is stated that despite the issuance of patta in 1973, their father continued to be in possession of the whole land till his death, and that thereafter, petitioners are in possession of the land. 2. According to the petitioners, complaining that while issuing patta, 1 acre of their land was excluded, they made Exts.P3 and P4 applications for assignment of 50 cents each. Petitioners submit that although the 4th respondent gave a report favourable to them, the matter is still pending before the 3rd respondent. It is stated that seeking expeditious action on Exts.P3 and P4, they have submitted Ext.P5 representation and even on that representation, orders have not been passed. It is with this complaint, the writ petition is filed. In the aforesaid circumstances, what is required is that the 3rd respondent, before whom Exts.P3 and P4 are pending, should WPC No. 30422/10 :2 : pass orders on these applications. In that view, I dispose of this writ petition directing the 3rd respondent to consider Exts.P3 and P4 applications made by the petitioners. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 8 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp The words “till his death” occurring in the last sentence of first paragraph of the judgment dated 4/10/2010 in WP(C) 30422/2010 are deleted vide order dated 23/11/2010 in I.A.15697/2010. Sd/- Registrar (Judicial)