Q . ‘a%%‘\ Wé’ C9 $3 gag ”TEL Shgle Ranch IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. W.P. (S) No ...... W535 .2011 / PETITIONER................... Hemraj Patel, S/o Shri Shalikram Patel, Aged 52 Years, U.D.T., Middle School, Kolihadevri, Basna District Mahasamund C.G. s /i, RESPONDENTS (1) The State Govt. of Chhattishgarh, Through — The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) (2) District Education Officer Mahasamund, District Mahasamund ( C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OR MANDAMUSIDIRECTION OF OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT. , @ HIGH CGURT OF CHHATTISGARI‘K AT BILASFUR SB : HGN’BLE SHRI JUST!CE MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA W.P.(S1 N0- 4536 l 201 1 PETITI0NER Hamraj Patel RESPONDENTS State of C.G. 81, Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226(227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: . Shri Somkant Verma, counsel for thc petitioner, Smt. Smita Ghai, P.L, for thc State] respondents. ORAL ORDER (1 1.08.201 1) The petitioner was initially appointad as Teacher on a fixed pay of Rs. 100. After complcu'on of probation period, he was granted rogular pay scale: of Rs. 169—300. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the issued involved in the case is as to whether the petitioner is entitled to mgular pay scale with effect fmm the date of initial appointment or after completion of probation period. The issue involved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabaipur in O.A. NO. 2745/89 madhukant Yadu and 56 Others v. State of M.P. & Others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale with effect fmm the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon’ble Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from the date of initial appointment. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that this Court, while considering the same issue in Amar Sai Ram. 8a Others Vs. State of Chhattlsgarh & Others, W.P.[S) No. 4725/2006, by order datéd 01.09.2006, allowed the petitioners to make a mpresentation Within a period often days, mising an thc grievances. Accordingly, the p¢titioner 1's granted h'herty to make a mpmsentation raising ail the grievances in light of the aforestated judgment and order dated 5.1.2011 (Annexure P/S) and in mm, the concerned respondent is directed to decide the nepresentation, if any, in accordance with law, on its OWn men‘ts, within a period of three veridcation months fmm of the the facts. date of Ieceipt of the representation, subject to In View of the foregoing, this petition is disposed Of. No order as to costs. " a Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastavae Judge