^ HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHR1 RAJEEVGUPTA, CJ. HON'BLE SHRI DH1RENDRA MISHRA, J. PETITIONER i.C.C.No. 104 of 2008 SMT. SWEKSHA SINGH W/o. Shri Aditya Singh, aged about 28 years, R/o. Tilak Nagar (Chatapara], Bilaspur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS 1. "3: 6. 8. Versus STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Through- Secretary, Ministry of Home, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Secretariat, G.E. Road, Bhopal (M.P.) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, through- Registrar General, High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur (C.G.) SHRI AWONT SINGH CHANDRAKAR, S/o Shri N.S. Chandrakar, aged about 33years, Mukt Nagar Padmanabhpur, Durg [C.G.] SR. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE Durg District, Collectorate, Durg [C.G.] TOWN INSPECTOR Police Station, Durg [C.G.] SMT. RAJNI DUBEY Seventh ASJ/ADJ, Fast Track Court, Durg [C.G.] SHRI RAJESH SHRIVASTAVA Judicial Magistrate First Class District Court, Durg [C.G.] SHRI RAMKUMAR TIWARi Additional Chief Magistrate, District Court, Durg [C.G.] 9. STATE BAR COUNCIL OF ^ CHHATTISGARH, through- Secretary, State Bar Counsel of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur [C.G.] ApDlication to recall order dated 21-02-2008 wherebvW.P. 1876 of 2004 was dismissed for want of prosecution Present: Shri V.G. Tamaskar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State / respondents No. 1,4 &5. ORDER rth (07In Mareh, 2008) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Heard learned counsel Torthe parties. 2. The petitioner is seeking restoration ofW.P.No.1876/2004 which was dismissed vide order dated 21-02-2008, for want of prosecution. 3. On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, we are satisfied that the absence of the petitioner's counsel on 21-02-2008 when W.P. No. 1876/2004 was taken up for hearing, was based on bona fide grounds. 4. Therefore, M.C.C.No.104/2008 is allowed and W.P.No.1876/2004 is restored to its original number., \ Sd/- .^Chief Justice Sd/- DhirendraMlshra Judge subbu