:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 702 OF 2006 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 702 OF 2006 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 702 OF 2006 Sayed Nasir Sayed Ibrahim ..Petitioner versus Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Khan Abdul Wahab for the Petitioner. Mr. D. S. Mhaispurkar, APP for the Respondents - State. Mr. M. Goswami, for the Respondent No.2. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE, & CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE, & CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE, & V. K. TAHILRAMANI,JJ. V. K. TAHILRAMANI,JJ. V. K. TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : 18TH APRIL, 2006 DATE : 18TH APRIL, 2006 DATE : 18TH APRIL, 2006 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard. Rule. Returnable forthwith, by consent. 2. The petitioner is related to the accused in Bombay Blast Case, i.e. he is the nephew of the wife of the accused involved in Bomb Blast case and on that count Passport Authorities have refused to issue passport. :2: 3. We have passed an order on 7.3.2006 in Writ Petition No. 138 of 2006 in favour of Mrs. Shamim Aara Mohammad Ismail, her husband’s sister’s husband was involved in Bomb Blast case and on that count police took objection for grant of passport. The present writ petition No. 702 of 2006 is of the similar nature. There is no role or involvement of the present petitioner in the said Bomb Blast case, therefore, the same order i.e. Passport Authorities are directed to issue the passport to the Petitioner, if he otherwise fulfills all the conditions. 4. Rule made absolute. (D.G. DESHPANDE, J. ) (D.G. DESHPANDE, J. ) (D.G. DESHPANDE, J. ) (V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.) (V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.) (V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)