^ ^ c^\^1^ SWGLE 8EMS IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH^ W.P. (S) No. f^\\°^ /2010 PETITIONER A0-^ <\^>':^';..- ?.<;^^.-""" [^•'{/O ^^y' ^.•A" ->1'/\ .^••' Ku. Sudipta Bose, D/o. Late P. C. Bose, aged about 52 years, working .....\4l^ as Asstt- Gra<le - II, O/o. Dy. Director, Fisheries Department, R/o. Nehru Nagar, Church Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) ,.^'y^ ^'.^^" ^x' ^'~ RESPONDENTS: (1) (2) VERSUS ;<" State of Chhattisgarh through its Secretary, Department of Fisheries, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director of Fisheries, Raipur (C.G.) (3) K. L. Kurre, working as Asstt. Grade -II, O/o. Asstt. Director, Fisheries, Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA -HC—78 ^^l ^T R-114) ^T8H 3?T^?T5F^N' Tumane ^S*l^li 'Sls^flW 'S^r '^INKrl^, ^tli<>-l^l(o, [s|Qll-M^< .VJ.;..?.£;..^:.3r:).l?/..l0."^200 ^^l TPRT ('^33T^T) ^<HW?rf^T 3^1 SB: Hon'bte Manindra MoNan Shrivastava. J. 08-07-2010 Shri P. S. Koshy with Sjiri Vinod Cteshmukh, counsel for the petitioner Shri Bhaskar Payashi, Pe|nel Lawyer for tte State/respondents No.1 & 2 on advance copy. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, cc|unsel for respondent No.3. Heard. Leamed counsel for the from Raipur to Bilaspur on her| (Annexure P-5) and now, within again being transferred to Janjg| 02-07-2010 (Annexure P-1) to coming to Bilaspur on his own Submjssion of tearned petittonerdfe worked at Bjlaspur) continuing at Bilaspur. In this view of the matter, of frequent transfer, jt woufcl representation to the State representation being made, the take decisbn on the same, in period. With the aforesakj observat C^Ht<n<fli "HTR^yf ^f 'fe^ft <F3i<^i< ^^TH^TT^T petitioner submits that she was transferred |request vide order dated 29-06-2009 ^ very short period of one year, she is injgjr-Champa vide jmpugned ord©rdated ^ccommodate r^pondent No.3, who is r^lUest. co|L»nsel fw res|X)ndent No.3 is that the since long and she is inter^ted in the petitioner is aggrieved on account |3e open for the petitioner to make G|3vemment in that regard. On such ()ompetent authority shal) consider and ac|cordance with law, within a reasonatrie (ion, tte petition is finally dfeposKl of. ^>D Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ...M