IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND FEBRUARY 2011 / 13TH MAGHA 1932 LA.App..No. 115 of 2011() --------------------------------- LAR.34/2006 of PRL.SUB COURT, KOTTAYAM .................... APPELLANT/RESPONDENT NO.1 IN LAR :- ------------------------------------------------------------ STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM. SR.GOVT. PLEADER SMT.LATHA T. THANKAPPAN RESPONDENTS/CLAIMANTS AND R2 IN LAR :- ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1. S.RAJESWARY, W/O.R.SREENIVASAN, THRIKARTHIKA, T.B.ROAD, CHANGANASSERY, PIN-686 101. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRIAL TRANSMISSION DIVISION,KSEB, POOVANTHURUTUHU, KOTTAYM-686012. THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: jvt LA.App..No. 115 of 2011 ORDER IN I.A.No.320/11 IN L.A.A.No.115/2011 Dismissed. Sd/- PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. Sd/- N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. 2.2.2011. //True Copy// P.A. to Judge PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JJ. ---------------------------------- L.A.A. No.115 of 2011 ------------------------------ Dated this the 2nd day of February 2011 J U D G M E N T Pius C. Kuriakose, J. Even though attractive grounds are raised in the appeal and Smt.Latha T. Thankappan, the learned Senior Govt. Pleader addressed strenuous arguments based on them. Having gone through the impugned judgment and having taken into account the importance of locality as emerging from the evidence on record, it is clear to our mind that the enhancement granted by the Reference Court is quite reasonable. We are sure that it is more or less the correct market value at the relevant time arrived at by the learned Sub Judge. Hence the appeal is dismissed. No costs. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J UDGE. Jvt