IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 536 of 2011 & connected matters. Decided on: 25th February, 2011. 1. CWP No. 536 of 2011 Tilak Raj Versus State of H.P. & ors. 2. CWP No. 537 of 2011 Naresh Kumar Versus State of H.P. & ors. 3. CWP No. 538 of 2011 Hans Raj Versus State of H.P. & ors. 4. CWP No. 539 of 2011 Yogesh Kumar Versus State of H.P. & ors. 5. CWP No. 540 of 2011 Shiv Charan Versus State of H.P. & ors. 6. CWP No. 571 of 2011 Raj Kumar Versus State of H.P. & ors. 7. CWP No. 576 of 2011 Rattan Lal Versus State of H.P. & ors. 8. CWP No. 577 of 2011 Sukh Dev Versus State of H.P. & ors. 9. CWP No. 578 of 2011 Ram Chand Versus State of H.P. & ors. 10. CWP No. 579 of 2011 Balbir Singh Versus State of H.P. & ors. 11. CWP No. 581 of 2011 Hem Raj Versus State of H.P. & ors. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Prakash, Advocate. 2 ( in all the writ petitions) For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners in all these cases claim work charge status/regularization with all consequential benefits from the date they completed 10 years of continued service. Reliance is placed on the decision of the Supreme Court rendered in Mool Raj Upadhyaya vs. State of H.P. and others, 1994 Supp. (2) SCC 313. 2. The learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. The petitioners may file individual representation furnishing all factual details before the second respondent within a period of one month from today. The second respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, in the light also of the decision referred to above within a period of another four months. The petitioners will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the judgment, referred to above, while submitting the representations. 3. The writ petitions stand disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 25th February, 2011. (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (sds/krt) Judge.