IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36268 of 2008 VIKASH KUMAR @ VIKAS KUMAR SON OF SRI PREM KUMAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NASARIGANJ (BISCUIT FACTORY MORE), P.S. DANAPUR, DISTRICT PATNA ……. PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ……. OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- 14. 14.7.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the Counsel for the informant. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence under Section 498A of the Penal Code. Petitioner is the husband of the complainant. In view of the allegation set out in the complaint, I am not inclined to admit him to the privilege of anticipatory bail. In the circumstances, the application is rejected with a direction to the petitioner to surrender in the court below (S.D.J.M., Danapur, Patna in Complaint Case No.874C of 2007) within four weeks from today and apply for regular bail, which should be considered by the court below in accordance with law. The Counsel for the Complainant states that this Court should direct the trial court to proceed with the trial and conclude the same at the earliest. As requested by the Counsel for the Complainant, the trial court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible in any case within six months from the date of appearance of the petitioner. The order granting interim protection dated 11.11.2008 is recalled. Narendra/ ( V. N. Sinha, J. )