IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-11745 of 2011 Date of decision : 03.06.2011 Surender Kumar … Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana though Advocate General Haryana …Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.C.PURI Present: Mr.Aman Pal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Amit Rana, DAG, Haryana. K.C.Puri, J. The petitioner has applied for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.39 dated 19.1.2011, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station City Jagadhari, District Yamuna Nagar. As per allegation of the prosecution, petitioner was the original owner of the house. He sold the same to Darshan Kaur wife of Inderjeet Singh vide sale deed dated 31.3.2010, who further sold the same to Pardeep Kumar- complainant on 7.7.2010. It is alleged that there was a loan of Rs.10,29,280/- on the said property. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that Darshan Kaur and Inderjeet Singh, named in the FIR, have been allowed concession of anticipatory bail by the Additional Sessions Judge. Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the affidavit of Inderjeet Singh husband of Darshan Kaur dated 26.4.2010, wherein he has mentioned that the entire loan amount, would be paid by him and his wife. Learned State counsel has stated at bar that during interrogation, Inderjeet Singh made a disclosure statement that he has executed an affidavit (Annexure P-1). The petitioner is stated to be in custody since 16.2.2011. Without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition stands allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail to the satisfaction of trial Court. ( K.C. Puri) Judge 03.06.2011 sd