1 W.P.No.10838.09 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10838 OF 2009 Mahasanchalak, Aarogya Seva Hivtap Va Hattirog, Pune, & anr. ... Petitioners v/s Shri Tanaji Ramrao Kothare ... Respondent Mr.A.D.Kango, A.G.P. For the petitioners. Mr.T.D.Deshmukh for the respondent. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 14TH FEBRUARY, 2011 P.C.: 1. The petition has been preferred against the order passed in Complaint (ULP) No.47 of 2004 filed by the respondent. This complaint had been filed under Item 9 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971, in which the respondent contended that he had not been made permanent although he had completed 240 days in service. It appears that an affidavit has been filed by the respondent 2 W.P.No.10838.09 indicating that his name has been included in the seniority list from 1.1.2009. The petitioner has also issued an order directing that the service-book should be issued to those who are included in the seniority list. Thus, it appears that the petitioners have implemented the order passed by the Industrial Court for all practical purposes. However, the order granting permanency is yet to be issued. In my opinion, the Industrial Court has not committed any error by granting relief to the complainant and in fact it appears from the record produced before me that the petitioners are in the process of implementing the impugned order. 2. Writ petition rejected. ..... 3 W.P.No.10838.09