IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38429 of 2010 1. MAHESH RAM 2. SARYU RAM @ SANJU RAM @ SARYUG RAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 10.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the state. Submission of the learned counsel for petitioners is that land dispute is there in between the parties and earlier threatening to file a case for the offence under section 3(1)(X) of S.C./S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act was given to concern police station. Stress is on the point that allegation about abuse in name of complainant’s caste is false, may be the reality, but anticipatory bail petition is not maintainable. No doubt that has been leveled against petitioner no.2 only. Accordingly, prayer of petitioner no.2 for anticipatory bail stands rejected as not maintainable. However, petitioner no.2 is at liberty to surrender in the court below and pray for regular bail which shall be decided on its own merit under the observation made over above without being prejudiced by this rejection order on the same day. 2 So far as petitioner no.1 is concerned, he is allowed bail. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner no.1 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Complaint Case No.02C of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.)