13252) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA WRIT PETITION NO: 16611 OF 2011 Between: S. Sandeepa, D/o. S. Sudharshan Reddy, aged 23 years, R/o. D.NO. 1'1-1- '1807, Maruthi Nagar, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District- ...PETITIONER AND1. tvl/s. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Rep- by its Chairman-cum- Managing Director Having its registered office at 17, Jamsjedji Tata Road, Mumbai. 2. The Redressal Committee, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Rep. by its Chief Regional Manager, Office at 9-1-1 30/1 , Sebastian Street, S.D. Road, P.B. No.5, Secunderabad. 3. K. Buila Jyothy, W/o. K. Johnson Business R/o. Kamateshwar, Nizamabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring action of the respondents in selecting the 3rd respondent in violation of the guidelines as framed by the Corporation for appointment of Retail Outlet Dealership at Nizamabad Town on NH'16 within 2 Kms. from Rokad HanumanTemple towards Armoor, Nizamabad District in pursuant to the notification dated 08.06.2009 by reconducting the interview on 18.08.2010 without finalizing the selection as per the interview conducted on 29- 08-2009, as arbitrary, illegal, without jurisdiction and in violation of the well settled principles of natural justice. l.A. NO: 1OF 2011 WPMP. NO: 19935 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumslances slated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appointment of the 3rd respondent as lhe Retail Outlet Dealer at Nizamabad Town on NH16 within 2 Kms. from Rokad Hanuman Temple towards Armoor, Nizamabad District in pursuant to the notification dated 8.6.2009 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAMA RAO GHANTA Counsel for the Respondent No.1 & 2: THOOM SRINIVAS, SC FOR HPCL Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI P. ROY REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA WRIT PETITION No.16611of 2011 ORDER The prayer as sought for by the petitioner in the present writ petition reads as under: "To issue an order writ or direction more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus declaring action of the respondents in selecting the 3rd respondent in violation of the guidelines as framed by the Corporation for appointment of Retail Outlet Dealership at Nizamabad Town on NH16 within 2 Kms. from Rokad Hanuman Temple towards Armoor, Nizamabad District in pursuant to the notification dated 08.06.2009 by reconducting the interview on 18.08.2010 without finalizing the selection as per the interview conducted on 29-08-2009, as arbitrary, illegal, without jurisdiction and in violation of the well settled principles of natu ral justice" 2. Mr.Thoom Srinivas, learned Standing Counsel for HPCL I I appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2 brings to the / I ! ; i I 2 SN.J WP.t56l I of20tl notice of this Court that the cause of action in the present writ petition does not survive for further adjudication any more. 3. Bringing the said submission on record, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/- V. HARI PRASAD ASSTSTANT REqSTRAR sEcrroN oIFi6en To, 1 2 3 4 hD One CC to SRI RAMA RAO GHANTA, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI P. ROY REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI THOOM SRINIVAS, SC FOR HPCL [OPUC] Two CD Copies BN GJP i' I HIGH COURT DATED:2311112023 ORDER ,-r o, v O *& ,\ sQ *oa -t- 1EL4 gct$ * k. WP.No.16611 ot 2011 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS l!o cO t\ c @q6 I : .(e I : tr6