IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Civil Writ Petition No.2361 of 2010. Date of decision: 21.05.2010. Vijay Kumar ….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Others ….Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge. Whether approved for reporting ?1 No. For the Petitioner: Mr.Lalit Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr.R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr.J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J.(Oral): The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:- (1) “ That the respondents may kindly be directed to decide the representation of the petitioner Annexure P-3 forthwith. (2) That the respondents may kindly be directed to place the petitioner in the pay scale of Rs. 3120-5160 w.e.f. 1.1.1996 and Rs.5910/- w.e.f. 1.1.2006 and after re-fixation, grant him the difference in pay scale along with interest at the rate of 12% per annum. (3) That the respondents may kindly be directed to designate the petitioner as Junior Technician (Painter) in terms of 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2 Annexure P-6 and place him in Class-III category instead of Class-IV category.” 2. It is submitted that the petitioner has filed a representation Annexure P-3 which is pending before the 3rd respondent. There will be a direction to the 3rd respondent to look into the mater and take appropriate action in accordance with law adverting to the submission made in representation Annexure P-3 within a period of one month from the date of the production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of so also the pending applications. Copy dasti on usual terms. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Dev Darshan Sud), Judge. May 21, 2010 (aks/r)