BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Ninth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S. TAMILVANAN CRL OP(MD)Nos.15445 and 14712 of 2011 K.NARAYANAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN IN CRL OP.15445 OF 2011 1.C. JAYAKUMAR 2.J. MARY JEBALATHA 3.S. NEWTON ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 2 TO 4 IN CRL OP.14712 OF 2011 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CITY CRIME BRANCH, PALAYAMKOTTAI TIRUNELVELI DT. CR.NO.54/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT IN BOTH CRL OP'S For Petitioner : M/S. T.SELVAN Advocate in Crl OP.15445 OF 2011 For Petitioner : M/S. ANANTH C. RAJESH, Advocate in Crl OP.14712 OF 2011 For Respondent : MR. K.S. DURAIPANDIAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC POROSECUTOR IN BOTH CRL OP'S PETITIONS FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/accused, as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent. 2. The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused facing charges for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 120(b), 419, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 420 IPC., in Crime No. 54 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police, have come forward with these applications, seeking anticipatory bail, under section 438 Cr.P.C., 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence. He would further submit that a false case has been foisted against them and hence, he prays for anticipatory bail. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent has not disputed the fact that there is no bad antecedents against the petitioners. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that there is no bad antecedents against the petitioners, I find it just and reasonable to grant anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate NO.I, Tirunelveli and on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am., until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.p.c., Scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed. sd/- 09/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.I, TIRUNELVELI 2 DO THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI 3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CITY CRIME BRANCH, PALAYAMKOTTAI, TIRUNELVELI DT. 1. CC to M/S. T.SELVAN Advocate SR.No.43153 1CC TO MR. ANANTH C. RAJESH, ADVOCATE,SR:43038: DM::2011:DECEMBER:15:: ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15445 & 14712 of 2011 2P:7C:: Date :09/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/