CRIMINAL APPEAL N0L/200 336 PE gLLANT a , n m-e, aed 52 ears Rdt f Villa e Kumharz. (Jara), Pollce Station Kha&w ra, nistnct Raipur Chhattlsgarh L RsPdD state of c.G. throuh ponce Stuon arora, lsrlct Raiur (C G ‘ “- \i CVIC¥IION ON / 302 of I.P.C. Lif'lpw' ia ‘ emrispmexit' a‘n ar of Rp 0‘_ uees 100 f f p or o ine of ruees f he addinonal roruis§1h§5 t egq rsionment o CRIMINAL ggpm. UNDER sacnw 37442) F CRIMINAL PRCEDURE 197§ I i Naryan Verma so of Tej RaVlma g y, eslen o . I ‘ gNEwar’ g a f Kh Dt p ) SENTENCE U/S ,_ i . 01H ; V V O O k X1-HC-78 WWWW ,. mo.‘o%"oooooo . (M-M?1§Zm€ ‘0 00 W 200 WW<W> WWW WWR’ r mmmam a;a¢%um DIVISION BENCH - '“OI ’BL£ u‘u‘IR I. C 8%ADOO, mg Cu}. & ‘HON’BLE MR SUNIL KUMAR SINHA J. 08 02 2007 ‘ Shn J.S. Baraik, Advogateg appears for the appellant, Shri Akhil Mishra‘ Panel ver forthe Stata This apneal has been nref rred against the judgment of convnctlon and mder of gentenma dafed ’8 4 2005 pa:snd by 10‘" Add! Samoa: Judae (FTC), Ramur In Se smns Tnal No 19/2006 whereby the laamed tnal Court has convict the accused Narayan Verma for the commlsslon of offence Dumsha Ie uls 302 IPC and sentenced him ho undergo for Irfe Imonsonment to pay a hne of Rs 1000/- Thrs appeal (CrA No 713 006) was med on 19 72006 whereas auamst the same rudament rlier on 4.7.2006 the accused has oreferred an anneal throuuh Sh Kishore Bhaduri Advocate which wear registered as Cr A No 629¢006 n 4 7 2006 therefore the accused has already oreferred an anneal wh Is pendlno consrderahon ln .vrew of the above, this appeal (Cr.A.No;713/2006) and M.Cr.P.No.2038/06 for suspension of sentence, are disposed of being unnecessary. However Mr Baraik learned counsel rs permuted to assrst Mr Klshore Bhadun Advocate wno has filed the aopeal on behalf of the appellant Vlde Cr.A.no.629/2006. r” Sd/- SUNIL KUMAR SINHA ' Judge 7 PIO. L w a a rc '