IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8378 of 2005 SMT.MEERA GUPTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 04/ 23.02.2010 No body appears on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. Rakesh Ambastha, learned assisting counsel to A.A.G. and learned counsel for the Accountant General are present. The widow of Late Dr. Nitya Nandan Prasad had filed the writ petition for payment of arrears of pension, family pension, gratuity group insurance amount, earned leave, G.P.F. and arrears of salary as admissible to her Late husband who superannuated from the post of Travelling Veterinary Medical Officer with effect from 30.9.2004. The husband of the petitioner expired on 21.12.2004. A counter affidavit was filed on behalf of the State in the year 2006 and in which it was stated that the family pension and gratuity of the petitioner had been sanctioned and that the G.P.F. claim of the petitioner had been forwarded. In so far as G.I.S is concerned, it was stated that an amount of Rs. 79, 132/- had been paid. The period of unauthorized absence has been regularized and adjusted against extraordinary leave and other leave admissible to the petitioner and thus it was stated that the 2 petitioner was not entitled to any amount towards unutilized leave salary. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf fo the respondent no. 7, the District Provident Fund Officer, Sitamarhi who has stated that the G.P.F. claim of the petitioner has been redressed. A supplementary counter affidavit has also been filed today on behalf of the respondent nos. 1 to 3 reiterating the said position. No body appears to controvert the submission made in the counter affidavit. The writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)