IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19762 of 2010 RAJEEV KUMAR PANDEY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 25.06.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State as also the learned Counsel for the informant The defence of the petitioner husband in a police case under Sections 498A of the Penal Code and Sections 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act from the allegations themselves is that he was allegedly impotent. The impugned order of rejection is in teeth of the guidelines laid down by this Court for grant of bail in matrimonial matters reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182 and the judicial adventurism in passing orders of the present nature also deprecated thereafter in 2006(4) PLJR 342. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of ACJM Patna City in Sultanganj PS Case No. 62 of 2009. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Court of 12th Additional Sessions Judge, Patna which has passed the impugned order of rejection. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)