IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 3RD DECEMBER 2007 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 WP(C).No. 16037 of 2004(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SRI. M.A.HARIDAS, MANAGING PARTNER, M/S. PRATHEEKSHA THEATRE, PALLURUTHY, KOCHI-6. BY ADV. SRI.A.V.XAVIER SRI.JOLLY JOHN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR OF ERNAKULAM, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD. 3. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (R.R), KOCHI-1. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PALLURUTHY VILLAGE OFFICE, KOCHI. BY G.P. SMT.SMITHA SUKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: TRUE COPY OF THE STAY ORDER IN WPC NO.34461/2003. P2: TRUE COPY OF R.R. NOTICE DT.5.4.2004. P3: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DT.13.4.2004 OF THE PETITIONER. P4: TRUE COPY OF LETTER DT.20.4.2004 BY COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER. P5: TRUE COPY OF NOTE DT.21.4.2004 MADE BY R2 WHILE FORWARDING EXT.P4 TO R3. TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. .................................................................... W.P.(C) No.16037 of 2004 .................................................................... Dated this the 3rd day of December, 2007. JUDGMENT The petitioner is challenging revenue recovery proceedings for recovery of amount awarded by the Labour Court. It is specifically stated in Ext.P1 that petitioner has challenged the award through another writ petition(W.P.(C) No.34461/2003). Against the judgment in that W.P., Writ Appeal No.2577/2005 was filed which was allowed. Therefore, petitioner can enforce the relief already granted. In the circumstances, this W.P. is closed. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge pms