- 1 - 906.nms.944.11 rpl.14.11 skt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 944 OF 2011 IN REVIEW PETITION (LODGING) NO. 14 OF 2011 IN ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 159 OF 2009 City Corporation Ltd. ..Petitioner -Versus- Chawala Interbild Construction Co. Pvt, Ltd. & Anr. ...Respondents .......... Dr.Virendra Tulzapurkar, Senior Counsel a/w. Mr.R.D.Soni i/b Ram & Co. for the Petitioner. Mr.Rajiv Singh i/b.Crawford Bayley & Co. for Respondent No.1. .......... CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 7TH APRIL 2011. P.C. 1 Both the learned counsel states that the facts in the above Notice of Motion and Review Petition are similar to Notice of Motion No.943 of 2011 and Review Petition (L) No.15 of 2011, which I have disposed off by a separate order and judgment today. - 2 - 906.nms.944.11 rpl.14.11 2 For the reasons stated in Notice of Motion No.943 of 2011 and Review Petition (L) No.15 of 2011 in Arbitration Application No.160 of 2009, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of (a) and the Review Petition is made absolute is made absolute in terms of prayer (b). The Arbitration Application is restored to file and shall be heard by the learned designate of the Hon’ble Chief Justice. -