THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI Civil Revision Petition No.680 of 2008 DATED : 25-08-2009 Between: M.R.Sadasivappa S/o late Ramu and others …Petitioners A n d The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by By the District Collector, Anantapur …Respondent THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI Civil Revision Petition No.680 of 2008 ORDER: The revision petitioners herein are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.75 of 2005 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Hindupur, Ananthapur District, filed for perpetual injunction restraining the respondent herein from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property. Along with the suit, the petitioners/plaintiffs filed I.A.No.317 of 2005 under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC seeking temporary injunction restraining the 1st defendant from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property. The said application was dismissed by the trial Court, by order dated 6.2.2006. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners preferred C.M.A.No.3 of 2006 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Hindupur. The said appeal was also dismissed by judgment dated 18.1.2008, confirming the order of the trial Court dated 6.2.2006. Hence the present Revision Petition by the plaintiffs. This Court, while issuing notice, by order dated 10.3.2008 in C.R.P.M.P.No.891 of 2008, directed that the respondent shall not change the existing physical features of the plaint schedule property by dividing the same into plots and allotting to third parties. The said order continues to be in force as on today. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. In spite of notice, the respondent did not choose to appear before this Court and the Revision Petition is not opposed. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that the interest of justice would be met if the directions of this Court dated 10.3.2008 passed in C.R.P.M.P.No.891 of 2008 are continued till disposal of the main suit. Accordingly, the order under revision is hereby modified and the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent not to change the existing physical features of the plaint schedule property by dividing the same into plots and allotting the same to third parties till the disposal of the suit. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. _____________ G.ROHINI, J 25th August 2009 RAR THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI Civil Revision Petition No.680 of 2008 DATED : 25-08-2009