'•!&.- ^o >T r>C ff'UUATTS' IT o^^gs^^n; Manoj Kumar Thakur, S/o Jot Singh ThaKur, Aged about 31 years, R/b Viiiage Bhodlya, Tahsil Bhanupratappur, District Kanker !f' r^ \ ,.u.) s:%?OF'-r IT PETiTIOI 2 •-> 4 State of Chhattissarh, Through: Secretary, Tribal Weifare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) Coiiector, Dantewada, Dlstrict Dakshin Bastar, Dantewada (C.G.) . Director, Panchayat and Grarnin Vikas Vibhag, Chhatfisgarh, Raipur, District Raif: Chief Exeeutive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Bhasramgarh, District Dantewada (C.G.) BIock EducaSion Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Bhairamgarh, District Dantewada (C..G.) Chi'ef Executive On'icer, /^S^ i 1/3t^^^»lftf. V^^< ?»^sSI !t^WC^'^ Dantewada (C.G.) cnss *sfti^i t^t^E '«B3'~E ES' Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Counsei for the peiitioner. Shri A.rvind Dubey, pans! Lawyer for the State/'re No.1,2,3&5. e^ s^ui F^^s?.^ WUE^I 'is %Jr. E ^a^ *-t. y The petitioner has challenged the irnpugned order dated 30.11.2005 (Annexure P/9) passed by respondent No.5, whereby, \ the Officer incharae of the concerned Institution has been directed W.P. No.2169/2006 that the order dated 20.10.2005 (Annexure P/5) passed by the Janpad Panchayat, Bhairamgarh appointing Shiksha Karmi, Grade- ill, be not given effect to without the permission of the District Coiiector, Dantewada. Learned counsel for the petitloner submito that alrnost simiiariy placed petitioner has aiso filed another Writ Petition bearing No. 1223/2006 and the same was disposed of by order dated 25 Marc'n 2006 (Annexure P-12), therefore, this petition may also i3e disposed of in terrns of the order dated 25 March 2006 passed in the saidwrit petition, because, here aiso, the petitioner has made a representation (Annexure P/11), which is pending for its disposal. The aforesaid prayer is not opposed by learned counse! for ie ataie. The earlier vffit petition was disposed of in terms of the 3llowina order: "6. Having heard leamed counsei for the parties, in the fads and circumstances of the case, the respondents are directed fo consider and decide the representation (Annexure P/11), in accordance with ia'w, vvithin a period of three weeks, from the date of receipVproduction of copy of this order." ,2- With t'ne consent o'f the parties, the present 'writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 25 March 2006 passed in W.P.No.1223/2006 and the respondents are directed to consider and decide the representation (Annexure P/11) in accordance with !aw within a period of 3 weeks from the date of receipt/production of the copy of this order. T'ne petition stands finaliy disposed of. Accordingly, M.CvV.)P.No.1649/2006 also stands disposed^_-—— Sd/- SunilKumarSinha Judge