IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5460 of 2007 SRI MITHILESH KUMAR VERMA, S/o Late Paras Nath Verma, Resident of Rai Jai Krishna Road, Mitan Ghat, P.O.- Patna City, P.S.- Khajekalan, District – Patna, a retired account. ------- Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR represented through the Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Industries Deptt. Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director Industries, Industries Deptt., Bihar, Patna. 3. The Accountant General (A&E), Bihar, Patna. 4. The Joint Commissioner of Provident Fund, Directorate of Provident Fund, Pant Bhawan, Bihar, Patna. ---------- Respondents ----------- 2 16.05.2011 Heard Sri Dilip Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner, Smt. Manisha Singh, learned A.C. to Govt. Advocate No. 1, who appears on behalf of respondent nos. 1, 2 & 4 and Sri L.P.K. Rajgrihar, appearing on behalf of respondent no. 3/Accountant General (A&E), Bihar, Patna. Learned counsel for the petitioner in view of the statement made in the counter affidavit submits that most of the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed. It was submitted that the writ petition may be disposed of with an indication that if grievances still exist the petitioner may approach the competent authority. In view of stand taken by learned counsel for the petitioner there is no need to keep the matter pending. The writ petition stands disposed of with liberty that if still some grievances exist the petitioner may approach the competent authority by filing representation. If such representation is filed it is expected that same will be examined in its right perspective and disposed of at the earliest 2 preferably within a period of four months from the date of filing of such representation. The writ petition stands disposed of. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)