IN THE HIGH COURT QECHHATTISGARH AT RT! ASPUR WRIT PETITION-N :L97 272002 PETmON Ashish singh s/o mm Singh», n Agad yem's, Liocnwe of Fomign % I "‘ Li ®Qf _...-; ._ .. / quor shop,Rn1mpur, }’ ¢/ Bihspur (cs). ‘ Through Knmmvezr Singh (power of Amt-nay hoider) s/o Ramgulam Singh Aged 35 years, r/o Kududnnd, Bilaspur (CG) cx vs. ¢ w REsPoNbENTs : xékw of mamrh through the Secmfary, Depar‘rman‘r of Excise. Man'rmlcya, DKS Building, Raipur (C6). 2. The Collecfor(Excise), Bilaspur, dish-id Bilaspur (CG). 3. Th: District Excise Offiaar, Biiospur, diswicf Biiaspur (CG). WRIT Pei-I110»; UNDER ARTICLE gas/227 or THE consnwnON OF INDIA DETAIL§ OF THE PETITIQN : PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER : H1. W ER _ x I; ‘3’ ‘ $i XI-HC—7s I 6g WWW za.E/..%[.9.?: mm 311%31 W (Wu) wmmww ~mwim WVR‘ " mm ‘ WWwxwm *mm ' {3ivision Bench: Hon’ble $mi Dhi 'endra Mishra, ii Hon’bie 51m RN. Chandrakar, JJ Q, 0 110/2010: Common order passed separately 'm W.P.No.649/O3‘ Krishna Kumar 1 . , Ujjaine Vs. State of CG and otha‘rs. inmuding this petiti&!. ‘o‘igned and dated. Howevpr, while ductating the order, it was noticed that the issues invowed in W.P.Nioss1 1 76/03, 1573/03 & 1536/03 are entirely K different, therefore. the aforesaid cases are hereby delinked. I 3 was,” K ..¢ ’3) R“ i f. , \g DHIRENDRA sw. MIsHRA 51 s - ‘ RN. CHANDRAKARIJ Judge i y