IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8985 of 2005 DEEN DAYAL PRASAD Son of Sri Dev Chandra Singh, Village and Post Office Dindir, PS Haspura, District Aurangabad, at present posted as Assistant in Revenue Section at Aurangabad …….. Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through its Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Main Secretariat, Patna 2. The District Magistrate, Aurangabad 3. The Establishment Deputy Collector, Aurangabad 4. The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Aurangabad ……….Respondents ----------- 02- 4.5.2009 None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Heard Mr. Piyush Lal, learned Assistant Counsel to AAG III. The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent authorities to make payment of the differential amount of salary for the period of suspension in a situation where the order of suspension has been withdrawn. The respondents have placed on record their counter affidavit. 2. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. It appears that the petitioner was placed under suspension which was later on withdrawn. It is stated in the counter affidavit that the differential amount of salary for the period of suspension has been paid to the petitioner. It thus appears to me that the statements made in the counter affidavit render the writ petition infructuous. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. ( S K Katriar ) mrl - 2 -