M9 (a) i/94 kg QF GHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR : Hon’bie Shfi Dmp Raesaheb Deshmukh, J. M. A. (ca P.R,No.s12izeos Miscellaneous Appeal under Section §73 of the Motor vehicles Act Preseni : — Shrl All Asgar, counsel for the appellant. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 22"” day of August, 2G08} The matter is listed today for orders on default. (2) The Registry has pointed out that an application under Section 170 of the Motor Vehicles Act has not been med and since the appeal is barred by iimitation, application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal has also not been med. The appeal was preferred on 19-02-2608. On 22-02-2008, learned counsel prayed for three weeks to remove the default which was granted by the Registry. Thereafter, on 09-05-2008, finally four weeks time was again granted to the learned counsel for the appeilant to remove the default as pointed out by the Registry. (3) Shri Ali Asgari learned counsel for the appeilant submitted that the appliqation for condonation of delay in filing the appealtoould not be flied till date and prayed for further timer Prayer is rejected. No further time couid be granted. The appeal being barred by limitation is dismissed. l sw- l. Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh r /"’= i , ,' Tutna ne HIGH COURT sinqie Bench Appenant The Oriental msurance Company, {Eehnrjant NQ.3 Raipur, through its Divisiona! Manager, Divisional Office-Korba, District Korba (CG) Versas Respondent 1‘ Kumar Son of Panchram, aged about 35 Ciaimant No.1 years, Caste Ganda, resident of Viiiage Hasaud, PS‘ & Tahsii Jaijaipur, District Janjgir-Champa (CG) Respondent Kuber Son of Shivla! Sahu, aged about Defendant No.1 29 years, resident of village Dabnra, PS. Baramkela, District Raigarh (CG) Respondent 3. Anjani Kumar Agrawal, son of Shankar Defendam No.2 Lal Agrawal, resident of 154, Nagar Nigam Colony, Raipur (0.6.)