THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Crl.R.C.No.204 of 2007 and Crl.R.C.M.P.No.1824 of 2009 Dated:10th August, 2009 Between: P.Badrinath …Petitioner/Appellant and State of A.P., rep. by P.P. High Court, Hyderabad. …Respondent/Complainant *** THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Crl.R.C.No.204 of 2007 and Crl.R.C.M.P.No.1824 of 2009 COMMON JUDGMENT: This Criminal Revision Case is directed against the Judgment dated 02.01.2007 passed in Crl. Appeal No.307 of 2006 on the file of the Special Judge for the trial of offences under SCs and STs (Prevention of Atrocities) Act-cum-VI Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Secunderabad, whereby and whereunder the learned Special Sessions Judge dismissed the appeal confirming the conviction and sentence passed against the appellant/accused in C.C.No.101 of 2004 on the file of XI Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad. 2. When the revision case came up for consideration, the de facto complainant and the accused appeared before the Court and stated that they entered into compromise and in pursuance of the compromise, cheque amount has been received by the de facto complainant. They moved Crl.R.C.M.P.No.1824 of 2009 seeking permission to compound the offence under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. The parties are duly identified by their respective counsel. In that view of the matter, I do not see any impediment in permitting the parties to compound the offence. Accordingly, Crl.R.C.M.P.No.1824 of 2009 is allowed. 3. In view of the offence being compounded, the conviction and sentence of the revision petitioner/accused for the offence under Sections 406 and 420 IPC is set aside and he is acquitted of the same. The fine amount, if any, paid by him is ordered to be refunded to him. 4. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is allowed. ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date:10th August, 2009. cs