IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24740 of 2009 MUNDRIKA PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a Police case under Section 414 of the Penal Code, Section 33 of the Forest Act and Section 47A of the Excise Act. It is submitted that there is no allegations that the Mahua was stolen property or that it had been converted into an intoxicated drink but was available in a raw form as fruit itself. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named surrender in the Court below within a period of six weeks from today when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/-(twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sasaram (Tilothu) P.S. Case No. 367/2009, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)