IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. 54233-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION : 28.09.2006 Darshan Singh and another .... PETITIONERS Versus State of Punjab and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. Atul Sharma, Advocate, for Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. * * * Petitioners Darshan Singh and his wife Gulwant Kaur have filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuing direction to the respondents to protect their life and liberty and for registration of FIR against the persons named in the complaint Annexure P-6. After hearing counsel for the petitioners and going through the contents of the petition as well as the complaint, Annexure P-6, I am of the opinion that no exceptional case is made out for issuing the aforesaid direction in exercise of the inherent power of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C., as in my opinion, the petitioners have alternative remedy, as has been held by this Court in Mithlesh Kumari v. State of Punjab, 2002 (4) RCR (Criminal) 541 and by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gangadhar Janardan Mhatre v. State of Maharashtra and others, (2004) 7 SCC 768 and Minu Kumari and another v. State of Bihar and others, (2006) 4 Supreme Court Cases 359. Dismissed. September 28, 2006 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE