IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.23-M of 2008 Date of decision: 21.01.2008 Gurmeet Kaur ....Petitioner versus State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr.Dharam Kamboj, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Anter Singh Brar, DAG Punjab --- RAJESH BINDAL,J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in FIR there are no allegations against the petitioner that she had taken any money for sending someone abroad. Only allegation against the petitioner is that she entered into an agreement to sell the land for Rs.2,75,000/- and received the entire consideration money but no sale deed was registered. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no agreement was entered into by the petitioner. Even if the same is there, the dispute is civil in nature. Without opining on the merits of the controversy, it is directed that in case of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing of surety to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called upon for investigation and shall be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Disposed of. 21.01.2008 (RAJESH BINDAL) neenu JUDGE