IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH JANUARY 2008 / 26TH POUSHA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 1489 of 2007(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENTIN WPC.11943/2007 Dated 04/04/2007 .................... PETITIONERS ---------------------------- 1. MOHAMMED, S/O.LATE IBRAHIM, AGED 45 YEARS, MUNDACKAL HOUSE, IRINGOLE KARA, PERUMBAVOOR. 2. NAZER, S/O.LATE IBRAHIM, AGED 40 YEARS, MUNDACKAL HOUSE, IRINGOLE KARA, PERUMBAVOOR. BY ADV. SRI.P.ALI RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. DR.FATHIMA BEEVI, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE CHAIRPERSON, MUNICIPALITY, PERUMBAVOOR. 2. MR.V.V.SATHYAVAN, THE SECRETARY MUNICIPALITY, PERUMBAVOOR. BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KURIAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ----------------------------------------------- C.O.C.NO. 1489 OF 2007 IN W.P.(C)No.11943 OF 2007 ----------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 16TH JANUARY, 2008 J U D G M E N T The strenuous submissions made by Mr.P.Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner, notwithstanding I am not persuaded to hold that a prima facie case is made out for initiation of proceedings against the respondents. True there was some delay on the part of the Municipality. Though, belatedly directions in my judgment have been complied with and order has been passed by the Secretary. If the petitioner is having any genuine grievance against the said order, it is open to him to initiate proceedings challenging the order. The contempt case is closed. (PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE) ks. WP(C)N0. -2- WP(C)N0. -3-