IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13268 of 2010 1. MIRZA AZIZ BEG S/O LATE MIRZA DAYAN BEG R/O VILL.- PEWANDI, P.S.- CHENARI, DISTT.- ROHTAS 2. ANWARI KHATOON W/O MIRZA NAIEM BEG R/O VILL.- PEWANDI, P.S.- CHENARI, DISTT.- ROHTAS 3. RUKHSANA KHATOON W/O MIRZA FAHIM BEG R/O VILL.- PEWANDI, P.S.- CHENARI, DISTT.- ROHTAS 4. SHAMIM BEG S/O MIRZA AZIZ BEG R/O VILL.- PEWANDI, P.S.- CHENARI, DISTT.- ROHTAS Versus 1. SHAHABU NISHA W/O LATE ABDUL MOFID KHAN R/O VILL.- BANAULI, P.S.- CHENARI, DISTT.- ROHTAS 2. SAKIL BEG S/O LATE ABDUL MAZID KHAN R/O VILL.- BANAULI, P.S.- CHENARI, DISTT.- ROHTAS 3. KALIM BEG S/O LATE ABDUL MAZID KHAN R/O VILL.- BANAULI, P.S.- CHENARI, DISTT.- ROHTAS 4. SHAHID BEG S/O LATE ABDUL MAZID KHAN R/O VILL.- BANAULI, P.S.- CHENARI, DISTT.- ROHTAS 5. JAHID BEG S/O LATE ABDUL MAZID KHAN R/O VILL.- BANAULI, P.S.- CHENARI, DISTT.- ROHTAS 6. TANWEE BANO W/O FAIZ KHAN R/O MOHALLA- ADDA ROAD, SASARAM, DISTT.- ROHTAS 7. BILKISH KHATOON W/O ASLAM KHAN R/O VILL.- AMRI, P.S. SASARAM, DISTT.- ROHTAS 8. JOHDA KHATOON W/O SAWAHUDIN KHAN R/O VILL.- JAKKI BIGHA, P.S. DEHRI, DISTT.- ROHTAS 9. JHAN ARA W/O MAZID KHAN R/O VILL.- BANAULI, P.S. CHENARI, DISTT.- ROHTAS 10. SARWAR KHAN S/O LATE JAMALUDDIN KHAN R/O VILL.- PEWANDI, P.S.- CHENARI, DISTT.- ROHTAS ----------- 2/ 20/01/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioners are stated to be the plaintiffs. By the impugned order dated 3.7.2010 amendment sought on their behalf, as well as, on behalf of the defendant has been allowed. The grievance of the petitioners is that by the amendment an admission made in the written statement is sought to be withdrawn. - 2 - The Court does not consider it necessary to go into that question at this stage. Allowing an amendment does not grant finality to the issues. Even after the amendment the question of law, subject to the petitioner satisfying the trial court, remains open for consideration whether in fact there was an admission in which event the amendment though allowed may not be of any consequence at the final disposal of the suit. The writ application is disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)