1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. CHHATTISGARH ' €¥Ag§ig iwmh {‘V W QT M ? Now—£345— «"2009 1N M.CR.c.No.9s3/2009/” Applicant : 1. Sheikh Ahmed S/o Sheikh 'Mohd. Aged about 48 years, resident of Ramukund beside Vandana Auto Showroom Police Station Sarsawati Nagar Raipur, District — Raipur(C.G.) 2. Hussién Ahmed S/o Nafees Aged 24 years, resident of Moudhapara Near Haji Bada Raipur Police Station ' Moudhapara Raipur District— Raipur(C.G.) M: a Versus State of Chhatisgarh, House Through:Station office Police Station‘ Simga. Respondent APPLICATION FOR CORRECTION / ODIFICATION IN / BAIL ORDER DATED 2 06 09 Unoilr $ec 48Q5$ c7 [#o § XI—H ——78 WW \9 \® mmwmo/ m m (Wu) mam Wam fvam §€WSH§¥T WWW S B' Hon’ble Justice Mr. P itmker Diwaker 10-07-2009' « ‘;ef‘\\\ This is an applicatim for correction/modifation of bail ) W “ order dated 25.62009. Counsei for the peitioner submits that due to typing gnistake crjme number was entioned as 298/2068 whereas the correct crime number is 39 I2008. She further submits that the ¥ name of Dolice station ha aiso been wrenaiv mentioned as :Sarswatl Naoar Ratour whe eas it is Ssmoa Dtstnct Rasour Smt Hamida Siddiow counsel forthe aooiicants. on“ I-uvniu uducy, Pahei Lawyer fOi‘ the StatE. Heard E ic Mywwm: m“ ring teamed counsel for the State» was directed to produce oas diary. Qmthe last date of %%§%%W7“ wwdeW‘rnm Counsel for the Stat submits that he has seen the case diary and in fact the prese t applicants are accused in Crime No.398/2DO8 of Police Stati n Simga; District Raipur. 9 i Considering this fa t, the order dated 25.6200 is modified to the extent that piece of crime No.298l200 crime No.398l2008 should be re d and likewise in place of police station Sarswati Nagar, Rai ur; poiice Station Simga ehouid be read. Accordingly, the petiti n is disposed of $6 ‘ // ’ l §e :3 r0‘ ‘ e W“ v 8. : r r §1we“a%