THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1694 OF 2010 ORDER: 1 This revision is directed against the order dated 23.07.2010 in Crl.M.P.No.496 of 2008 in Crl.S.R.No.3268 of 2008 on the file of the court of the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Cyberabad at L.B. Nagar. 2 The Station House Officer, Narsingi P.S. received a complaint on the basis of which a case in Cr.No.294 of 2006 was registered on 15.11.2006 against the petitioner herein and another for the offences punishable under sections 420, 447, 427 and 506 r/w 34 of IPC. After investigation a charge sheet was filed on 27.11.2006 and the same was numbered as C.C.No.820 of 2006. In that the second accused, it appears, filed an application pleading discharge, which was ordered by the court below on 03.12.2007. Against that the de facto complainant filed Criminal Revision Petition. However, as there is a delay of about 190 days, it filed Crl.M.P.No.496 of 2008 under section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the said delay and the said petition was ordered. As stated supra, the same is questioned in this revision. 3 Heard. 4 No doubt, there is a delay of 190 days in filing the said revision, but, in my considered view, the same is not abnormal. In fact, the said aspect was taken into consideration by the learned Sessions Judge and accordingly allowed the said petition condoning the delay. Even if the said delay is condoned, it is not as though the revision will not be decided on merits. In the said revision, the petitioner can agitate everything and ultimately if the Sessions Judge comes to the conclusion that the said discharge is not proper, he will pass necessary orders. 5 In those circumstances, this court sees no merits in this revision and accordingly the same is dismissed. -------------- 31.01.2011 Kvsn