IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 13093 OF 2009 DATE OF DECISION : August 26, 2009. Parties Name Gurcharan Singh ...PETITIONER VERSUS State of Punjab and another ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH PRESENT: Mr. S.K. Sandhir, Advocate, for the petitioner. JASBIR SINGH, J. (oral) ORDER: This writ petition has been filed with a prayer that writ of mandamus be issued to respondent No. 2 to consider name of the petitioner for allotment of a plot out of the plots reserved for the members of the scheduled caste. It is apparent from the records and not disputed that as on today, no scheme has been framed by respondent No. 2, in which a plot can be allotted to the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner states that as per Punjab Town Improvement (Utilization of Land and Allotment of Plots) Rules, 1993, as and when scheme is framed, the authorities are supposed to reserve plots for members of the scheduled caste. It is further contention of counsel for the petitioner that earlier in the year 1982, petitioner moved an application and the same was rejected without taking note of the aforesaid CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 13093 OF 2009 -2- Rules. Then the petitioner came to this Court by filing CWP No. 15505 of 1999 with a prayer that directions be issued to the respondents to allot him a plot. When the matter came up for hearing before a Division Bench of this Court on November 4, 1999, counsel for the petitioner made a request that he be allowed to withdraw that writ petition with a view to make a representation for allotment of a plot in 375 Acres Development Scheme, out of the plots meant for reserve category. The request was accepted and the petitioner was allowed to withdraw the said writ petition with a hope that the concerned authority of the Trust would decide representation, if any, made by the petitioner, within one month of its submission. Counsel for the petitioner states that representation was made thereafter, however, the same has not been decided. At this belated stage, this petition cannot be entertained. If the petitioner was aggrieved, he should have come to this Court at an earlier point of time. No case is made out for interference. Dismissed. ( Jasbir Singh ) Judge August 26, 2009. DKC