Civil Revision No. 5883 of 2008 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 5883 of 2008 Date of decision : 17.3.2010 Mahinder ....Petitioner Versus Shri Ram Chander and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. Sanjay Vij, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Jai Singh Yadav, Advocate for Mr. Sachin Mittal, Advocate for the respondent. S. D. ANAND, J. The challenge herein at the hands of the petitioner is to an order granted by the learned Trial Court refusing to appoint a Local Commissioner. In the course of the impugned order, it was noticed that another Local Commissioner had already been appointed and that there was no force in the plea for appointment of a local Commissioner for demarcation of the property in suit. On being notified, the respondent entered appearance through a learned counsel who relied upon Ramji Rai and another Vs. Jagdish Mallah (Dead) through Lrs and another 2007 (3) LJR (Supplementary) 93 Supreme Court to raise a plea qua the maintainability of the petition itself. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, sought time to cite a ruling to the contrary and the matter was adjourned to Civil Revision No. 5883 of 2008 -2- **** 1.2.2010. On that date, the learned counsel for the petitioner applied for the grant of yet another adjournment for the purpose aforementioned and the matter was adjourned to 17.3.2010. Learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, very fairly informs the Court that he had not been able to lay his hands upon any judicial pronouncement to the contrary. In the light of above noticed factual scenario, the petition is held to be incompetent and shall stand dismissed accordingly. Disposed of accordingly. March 17, 2010 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE