IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.105 of 2009 INDU DEVI wife of LATE BIJAY SHANKER PANDEY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SIMARI, P.S. SIMARI, DISTRICT- BUXAR Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE, GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW DELHI 2. DIRECTORATE GENERAL, BOARDER SECURITY FORCE, 10, CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI 3. THE COMMANDAN, 12 BATTALION, B.S.F., DISTRICT BARAILY, UTTAR PRADESH. ---- 4 09.02.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.2. In this view of the matter, the writ application is permitted to be withdrawn to enable the petitioner to ventilate her grievances before the concerned authority by filing representation. In case such representation is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today along with the copy of the relevant documents in support of the claim as also the certified copy of the present order, the same shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. If the representation is - 2 - accepted, the admitted dues found payable be paid to the petitioner with statutory interest. However, if any of the claims either in full or in part is found not admissible, the same shall be communicated to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application is permitted to be withdraw with the above observations. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)