IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3218 of 2009 Date of Decision: May 29, 2009 Abey Ram and others … Petitioners Versus Mandeep Singh … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND Present: Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. S.D. Anand, J. (Oral) The learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners would be content and interests of justice would be served, if a time-bound disposal of the trial itself is ordered. The matter is presently stated to be fixed for 17.08.2009 before the learned Trial Court for plaintiff’s evidence. The petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Trial Court to pre-pone the matter to a date during the first fortnight of July, 2009. The pre-ponement shall, of course, be notified to the party opposite. Thereafter, the learned Trial Court shall dispose of the suit itself within three months from that date. Both the parties shall avail two adjournments each (for the purpose of adducing evidence). If C.R. No. 3218 of 2009 any party is inclined to summon any official witness, it shall be entitled to take dasti summons but the non return or non- effecting of service thereof would not entitle that party to ask for any further adjournment. The acknowledgment (of a copy of this order) issued by the concerned Judicial Officer shall be forwarded to the Registry of this Court. Learned District Judge shall himself maintain a tab to ensure that the case is disposed of by afore- mentioned period. Disposed of accordingly. May 29, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 2