IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1361 of 2006 SRI RANJAN KUMAR METIA Versus SMT.PRITY LALL & ORS. ---------- 10 8/12/2008 This Court would not find any error in the impugned order, whereby and whereunder, the petitioner-tenant has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.2000/- per month as rent in terms of section 15 of the B.B.C. Act. The plea of title and that too passed on some probate cannot be a ground for refusing payment of rent when such amount of rent is admitted. That being so, this application has no merit and is accordingly dismissed. In the event petitioner has not complied order of the court below with regard to payment of rent, both arrears and current as directed by the impugned order, which he must pay within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, failing which his defence against enjectment shall stand rejected, if not already rejected. (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar