IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7964 of 2010 RAJ KUMAR RISHIDEO, SON OF MAHENDRA SADA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-ETAVA MUSHAHRI, P.S. RAGHOPUR, DISTRICT-SUPAUL…………..PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………………OPPOSITE PARTY. --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Arun, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, A.P.P. ---------- 2. 12.3.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 25(1-B)A and 26 of the Arms Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. The alleged recovery was not made by the police rather it is stated in the First Information Report that the persons of locality had seized the illegal fire arms from the possession of the petitioner and production-cum-seizure list had been prepared by the police subsequently. The petitioner is stated to be in custody since 6.8.2009, i.e., from the date of lodging of the First Information Report. - 2 - Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Raj Kumar Rishideo, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri T. Nath, J.M. Birpur in Supaul, in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No.66/09, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be the close relative or his family member, who will file affidavit before the court below giving full genealogy showing his or her relationship with the petitioner. Further, after his release in this case, if the petitioner is again found to be involved in criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)