1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10107 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri A.P. Kulkarni for the Petitioner. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 18th February, 2010. P.C.: . Heard Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. On the face of it, the impugned order dated 31st August, 2009 passed by the trial Court is based on the consent of the parties. The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner has invited my attention to a reply filed by the Petitioner and submitted that the consent of the parties is not spelt out from the said reply. 2. In the impugned order, the learned Judge has not referred to the reply and obviously, the reference is to the concession made at the time of hearing of the application. If the contention of the Petitioner is that there was no consent given by her, the remedy of the 2 Petitioner is to make an appropriate application before the trial Court pointing out that no such consent was given by her. Therefore, this Petition cannot be entertained as the Petitioner will have to make appropriate application seeking appropriate reliefs before the trial Court. The Petition is disposed of by permitting the Petitioner to make an appropriate application before the trial Court. 3. To enable the Petitioner to file appropriate application before the trial Court, ad-interim relief granted on 25th January, 2010 will continue to operate for a period of four weeks from today. (A.S.OKA, J) ash/