IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 3792 of 2008 Decided on: 27.09.2010 Dr. S.P. Sareen and another. …Petitioners. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner. : Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. D.K. Khanna, Advocate, for respondent No. 3. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Ms. Archana Dutt, learned counsel for the petitioner pleads no instructions. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution, so also the pending application(s), if any. However, the liberty is reserved to the petitioner to revive the matter in accordance with law. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge September 27, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?