C9 rs / ^s^r' IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF GHHATTISGARH JUDICATUKE AT BILASPUR W- P . N0 . 2L^^> /2003. PETITIONER 3^^- •-»' ..--'.^•^' ^^9^ ^•^f* ..^ <L^'.^-" ^J^^ y KESPONDENTS ..<',^ ^^ ^/^ UV-.G" A.'' VERSUS 1. 2. Satyanarayan Gupta, aged about 45 years, son of Shri Sarju Prasad Gupta, resident of LI.G. 72 Shallendra Nagar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). Municipal Corporation Raipur, a Body Constituted under the Muni.cipal Corporation Act, 1956 at Ralpur. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Local Self GQvernment, Chhatfcisgarh/ Raipur^ D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) PETITION UNDER ARTIGLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OFWRIT IN FOBM 'OF MANDAMUS OR IN ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE FOKM THAT MAY BE' DEEM APPROPRIATE UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE OR ANY OTHER DIRECIION OR ORDER. XI-HC-22 sn^i^a •f^wa^I WtIWHf^I, -S^ 'WMvW, ^W ^v\Wjf. .OT^lTI^ , „ ^.^^^ wwn st)*ii<o •sn^i'ssnwaft^ 30/08/2003;— Heard Shri S.S. Agrawal Sonjay Ku. Agrawal, t>y. A.6., fo copy. ~ <|;ounsel for the petitioner ouid Shri the State/respondent, on advance Oevelop^nent permarfent Responcfent The petitioner has pref^i 226/227 of the Gonstitufion of K purchased a plot bearin9 No.D24S) situated jn Shailendra Nagar, Rai| the scheme of the Raipur was originally taken on Development Authority. respondent No.l by which the pri| namely Smt. Leela Bai wifeof Konl the said plot and copy of the terms of the lease deed Smt. L.e< said lease right to dny person uh< Nagar Tatha Sram Vivesh Viksit' Sanrachna Ke Viniyanon Niyam, t< thot the predecessor is required petitioner applied to respondent record hut no reply has been rec application on 25/01/2001 for tran; leasb <»ill(d<il-fWWff'? ft1^ <Fn'K;i< ^sipgnan^i I \rved this petition iinder Art-icles idiaalleging that the petitioner has having ah drea of ISOOsqudre feet ur by a registered sale deed under Aythority. The aforesaid plot lease from erstwhite Raipur No.2 is the successor body of pdecessor in title of the petitjoner [ailal Awadhiya became the lessee of deed is Annexure-P/2. Under the tla Bai was entitled to transfer the |er Rule37 of the Madhya Pradesh 6rihon Bhawan Tatha Anya -" s^j:. '-'.',. l;'r ^74. The only condjtion 'imposeS S!Sf~ ]to pay lj0% premium charge. The ^0.1 for changing the riamein the c]eived. The petition also moved an i^fer of his ndme. The petitlpner hq$/^. [^^ '"iWS;' :vs^SgWSSSSs XI-HC-22 3TI^(^>T i<-ii«t> soi^i •aTIiffilHtCT, a&l. '3^E['?qrai?p(; S'il^**®,ftw'Ma?. aii^T ^RI^ WWtl (hll'O •M 200 sii^iWiiwWn -2- come to know that there was a dit in that particular area about whi come to know that a compromise whole area-of which the petitiont not responding to the represenf Therefore, the petitioner has mdidamus commanding the resp| petitioner in plot No.E)249 and apj building on it. Havihg hedrd The learned having regwd to the facts a^ petitioner is atlowed to make a l' ' '^" ^.•;':';-:..'..^-..~-:,- within ten days from today'to representation of the petitioner same within a periocfof thirty representation ond ;pass an appro(>ri petitioner. Responaent No.t.is applications nvov'ecl By the petifior passapproppiateor'clersonthesd^ne With the above observatio =t,l<ll?fsil-< •W:Rff 41SIZt •<fW,K ^? apffff an^T pute with respecttothe Ismd situated ;h the petitioner was unaware but has iis been effected with respect to the ir is not aware. The respondents are ation of the petitioner. Therefore, prayed for issuance of a writ of gndents to record the name of .the irove the map for construction of the ;ounselappearing for the parfies ahd |d circumstances of the case, the retiresentation raising his oi|i grievunces |risspondent No.l. 'On receiving the respondent N0.1 shallconsider the d(iys from the date of receipt of the ppro^riate order and communicate to the fuil'ther directed to take decision on the i|ers earljer in an objective manner ond , the petition is disposed of,_ Sd/- __ L.C.Bhaduo Judge ^