IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5878 of 2010 RAMANAND PRASAD S/O LATE MISHRI PRASAD SAH R/O MOH NOORPUR, P.S.NATH NAGAR, DISTT-BHAGALPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. COMMISSIONER -CUM-SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, SECRETARIAT, PATNA 3. DIRECTOR , PANCHAYATI RAJ GOVT. OF BIHAR 4. DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER -CUM-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER BHAGALPUR 5. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE BHAGALPUR 2 06.04.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the respondent-Zila Parishad. The grievance of the petitioner is that while communicating the details of the payment made to the petitioner as per the order contained in memo no. 204 dated 11.06.2008 a sum of Rs. 80, 194/- has been deducted on account of non-passing of the Accounts Examination whereas the petitioner had passed the said examination. It is submitted that the petitioner was entitled to be paid the admissible amount of interest over the delayed payment of retiral dues. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Zila Parishad submits that after verifying the records and making necessary calculation it was found that the petitioner was entitled to a sum of Rs. 4,90,497/- only and the same have been paid as detailed in the aforesaid order as contained in Annexure-5. It is further submitted that the submission of the petitioner that he had passed the Accounts Examination needs to be verified since the - 2 - examination consists of two parts and without verifying the records the claims of the petitioner can not be allowed. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the grievances with regards to deduction of the aforesaid amount of rupees eighty thousands and odd, as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.4. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation after verifying the necessary records. In case the representation of the petitioner is accepted, the respondent no. 4 shall simultaneously issue necessary further orders with regard to refund of the aforesaid amount. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)