IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST JANUARY 2007 / 11TH MAGHA 1928 WP(C).No. 3370 of 2007(A) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ P.G.RAJALAKSHMI, LECTURER, DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS, S.D.COLLEGE, SANATHANAPURAM, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY BUILDINGS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE MANAGER, S.D.COLLEGE, ALAPPUZHA. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER (SHRI A. J. VARGHESE) BY ADV. SRI.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, SC, KERALA UTY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- W.P.C. NO. 3370 OF 2007 A -------------------------------------- Dated this the 31st January, 2007 JUDGMENT Petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P4. The only prayer pressed by learned counsel for petitioner is to take a decision on Ext.P5 representation after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. Ext.P4 is an order passed by third respondent Manager. It is apparently against the same that the petitioner has preferred Ext.P5 before the Government. Heard the learned Government Pleader also. The Writ Petition is disposed of as follows: There will be a direction to first respondent to consider and take a decision on Ext.P5 in accordance with law, after notice to petitioner, third respondent and any other affected party, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. Since I have not issued notice to third respondent, I make it clear that it is open to third respondent to take all contentions available to him under law including the contention relating to maintainability of Ext.P5. K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE kbk.