1?^ -<. HIGH CDTFRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BTLA8PITR Writ Peiltioii No. 5884 uf2003 PETITIONER Mathul Ram Saliu aged 62 yeas-s, S/o Shobhai^m Sahu, R/o Viliage Mudpar, Tah. Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa (CG). P^E.SPONDENTS : 1. Joint Director, Treasuries Accounts and Pension, Bilaspur (CG). 2. Chief Medical aad Hea'th OfScer Janjgir, Distt. Janigir Champa (CU). 3. State of Chhattisgarh, T!n-ough: Secretary, Department ot Health. DKS Bhawan. Raipur(CG'). (WRFT PETmON I^rNTDER ARTTCI-E 226 OF THE CONSTTHmON OF INDTA) ^SB: Hon b?e Mr. Satish K- Asiiihoti't- 3.) Present : Shri H.V. ShaiTaa, Advocate for t!ie petitio'ier. Shri Amrito Das, Panel Law\'er for the State. QRAL OP-DER (Pasised on 29tt day ofAprfl, 2008) I- Witli the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. 1. Tliis Detitioii Dsrtains to D^viiisiit ofretirsi beusfits, 3. This CourL in the matter ofW.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baiinalh MandalVs. The State of Chhattisgarh aiid others) a'ld ot!ier coniiected matters, directed ths Committee to consider the mattei' of tlie retira! dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constitutsd by ffae State Govemmsnt, pursuant to tiie order dated 1906.2006 passed m W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakai- Vs. State Governmeat and others) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105/2008 (State of Chhattisgarh aiid others Vs. Baijnatli ^.4lH!id£tl sii<i 3iioliisr\ Thus- tliis Detitioii is s'QUBrelv CQVsrsd bv the /' ^-•^-•''"•— y ^-^-^^.^ ^->w-^^^.^^-.^. ^..^ u-^^^t^.^ ~.^^ i-.^^ ,'-WA i-'-i-i- —-^ ^^tw judgment andA n—-!o--!o+nr! '21 st nf Ta <^i u<?i ud.i.t/U^ ^ ± of January, 2008 passsd in W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. T!ie State of Chhattisgarh and ot!is!"s) %nd other cQiiiiccted in&tters. ES subinittcd bv thc lcanied CQunscl a.DDesnn.2 for tlis Dsi'ties, rr ""^ "^"^"^0 -^'-'•^ ^-^^.-f ^t-u. ^^.—^. 4. This petitio" is disposed of in the same teniis i.e. the of35ce of the Advocate Genera! is directed to send tfae case to the Committee, wittiin a period of 15 days fi'om tiie date of receipt of a copy of this order. Therea&er, the Comimttee shal! issue notice to fhe petitioner and tlie ofEcers concenied, within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shal cocsider aiid pass order, in accordance wit!i 'aw, after affordiiig DTQDer ODDortiixiit^/ c*fhearin£to the Detitiosier. The netitionei* aiid tbc officsrs c-Qiic-enicd iiiav flle additioiiHl dQcuniesits. if iiscessa.rs1'. Ths siitirc excrcise. iiicludiiis n%vnient of retiral dnes< if aiiv. to the' petitioiier, be completed withiii a period of four montlis fi'om the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. 5. One extra copy of the papers of tlie petition shall be supplied by tlie 'eanied counse! appearing for tlie petitioner to Shri Amrito Das, Panel Lav-yer, ioday itself, for onward traiisnussio" to the cominittee. Sd/- Satish K. Agnlhotri Judge Saiiu