HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISIONBENCH Coram : HON'BLE SHRIRAJEEVGUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMARSINHA, J. APPELLANTS •^ RESPONDENTS ..t. M.A.No.962of2054 1. Smt; Archana Candrakar, w/o Santram, aged about 36 years 2. Ku. Leena Candrakar @ Ranu, D/o Santram, aged 11 years. 3. Vivesh, s/o santram, aged about 9 years, appl, no.2 & 3 are minor through mother apll. no.1. 4. Naini bai candrakar w/o late Pursotam Chandrakar, aged about 70 years. Altr/ovillageJamgaon(R) Thana Ramchirai Tah. Patan, Disst. Durg Versus 1. Lakhanlal.s/o Bhagwan Singh, R/o vitlage & post Khorpa, Tah. Abhanpur, Distt Raipur (C.G.) 2. Gurmukh Singh, s/o Siwara singh .Randhawa, aged about 46 years, r/o village & post Khorpa, Tah. Abhanpur, Disst. Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Oriental assu.co. Itd, C/0 Divisional Manager, Ma!via Road, Durg (C.G.) 4. BhupendraShahu.s/o Kunj Bihati Shahu, aged about29 years, 5^ Maniram, s/o Manrakhan, aged about 32 year, Res, no. 4 &5 r/o village Jamgaon (R) Tah. Patan, Disst. Raipur (C.G.) 6. The New India Assu. Co. Ltd., C/o Branch Manager, Parakh Bhawan, station roact, Durg (C.G.) /^^ l:^::3S!a r:x :;^s nimmi ''/. 1111 APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLESACT Present: None for the appellants. ORDER (12th December, 2008) The Tollowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J.: None for the appellants, 2. As there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, we are left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for vrant of prosecution. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- SunaKumarSmha Judge v J^^y^^SEiaK^.^^.s^l.aliM^^