1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.931 OF 2010 Gulam Farid Qureshi and Ors. .. Petitioners Vs. The Chief Executive Officer Slum Rehabilitation Authority and Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Parag Shelke i/b Mrs.Sarita Donde for the petitioners Mr.Milind More, A.G.P. for respondent / State Ms.V.S.Gharpure for respondent / M.C.G.M. Mr.G.D.Utangale i/b M/s.Utangale and Co. for respondent /SRA Mr.S.U.Kamdar, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Devrat Dhankar for respondent no.5 CORAM : J. N. Patel, Acting C.J. & S.C.Dharmadhikari, J. DATE : June 9, 2010 P.C. : 1. The petitioners in these petitions are aggrieved by the construction which has been commenced by the respondent no.5 developer on the property ‘ ’ more particularly described in prayer clause (b) of this writ petition. 2. Some of the petitioners in this petition and Writ Petition (L) No.1268 of 2010 are questioning the construction commenced pursuant to the Letter of Intent and commencement certificate granted by Slum Rehabilitation Authority. 2 This court in a full bench decision which is reported in 2008 (1) Bom. CR. 1 (Tulsiwadi Navnirman Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.) has taken a view that such disputes which are factual in nature and require detail scrutiny and probe, should be resolved and adjudicated by a high powered committee, which is already constituted, pursuant to the assurance of the learned Advocate General given to the full bench. The petitioners can approach the said Committee. In fact, in the companion Writ Petition, the petitioners have approached such high power committee which is seized of the appeal. The present petitioners can also join the said appeal or file their independent proceedings. Granting them such liberty, this petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J