IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15746 of 2005 DHARAM NATH SINGH Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ----------- 02/ 19.05.2010 Mr. Satish Narain Singh for the petitioner and Md. Jubaid Ansari, junior counsel to Mr. Rajiv Kumar Singh, learned counsel representing the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Bihar, Patna and other authorities of the Provident Fund Department are present. Mr. Ansari submits that the grievance of the petitioner has been examined and the pension of the petitioner has been revised and that the petitioner is now being paid his pension at the rate of Rs. 600/- per month in the light of the judicial pronouncement of this Court. It is further submitted that even the arrears of pension by way of aforesaid revision has been paid to the petitioner vide letter dated 28.3.2006 addressed to the Manager, Punjab National Bank, Pankaj Market, Muzaffapur. Learned counsel thus on the basis of instructions received from the Department submits that nothing survives in the writ petition. Taking into consideration the submissions aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)