1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 787 OF 2009 Sushil Ganeshrao Tayade. ... ... Petitioner. Versus Pune Municipal Corporation and Ors. ... ... Respondents. Mr. N. V. Bandiwadekar for the Petitioner. Mr. S. M. Gorwadkar for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Ms. M. P. Thakur, AGP for Respondent No.4. CORAM : D. D. SINHA and A. A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 13TH JANUARY, 2010. P. C.: Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is in respect of grant of promotion to respondent No.3 to the post of sub-Engineer without finalising the seniority list. Learned Counsel for the Corporation, at the outset, submitted that the petitioner has alternate efficacious remedy under Section 451 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 and therefore the petitioner should exhaust the said alternate remedy before approaching this Court. 3. In the circumstances, in view of the statement made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, we dismiss the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to exhaust the alternate remedy available in law. We expect the 2 authority concerned to complete the entire process within the reasonable time. Sd/- (D. D. SINHA, J.) Sd/- (A. A. SAYED, J.)