MP 1 WP1219_09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1219 OF 2009 Shri Tanaji Baburao Nikam ... Petitioner Versus Anand Gorakhnath Kumbhar and others ... Respondents Mr. A B. Borkar for Petitioner. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. MONDAY, APRIL 11, 2011 P. C. : By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 24th August 2008. 2. Mr. Borkar, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that since the petitioner was not served with the notice of the suit, he came to know about the decree passed in the year 1998, only in the year 2003 i.e. when the notice of the execution petition was received by him. 3. The delay if of 3027 days. Even for a moment, the contention of the petitioner is accepted that, till 2003, he was not knowing about the passing of the decree, only explanation for the years between 2003 to 2007, is that the petitioner was the old person. 4. There is no explanation worth namesake for the years from 2003 to 2007. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for interference with the impugned order. Rejected. (B.R. GAVAI, J)