IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 6054 of 1999 Between: N.Panchapakesan , S/o. Narayanaswamy, R/o. 4-603, Divyashakthi Apartments, Ameerpet, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Cooperative Deputy Registrar (O.S.D),(Arbitrator), The Prudential Cooperative Urban Bank Ltd., R.P.Road, Secunderabad. 2 The Prudential Cooperative Urban Bank Ltd., rep.by it's Director, R.P.Road, Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an order or writ direction much particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari calling for the records from the 1st respondent i.e., The Cooperative Deputy Registrar (OSD) (Arbitrator) The Prudential Cooperative Urban Bank Ltd., R.P.Road, Secunderabad pertaining to the Award passed on 20.11.1998 in A.R.C.No.571/98 P.B.A. and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and against the provisions of A.P.Mutually Aided Cooperative Societies Act 1995 and the Rules framed there under and consequently set aside the same Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.N.JAGAN Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO. 6054 OF 1999 ORDER: Since none appeared for the petitioner on 26.3.2008, the writ petition was directed to be posted “for dismissal”. Today though the writ petition is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, neither is the counsel for the petitioner present nor is there any representation on his behalf. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as costs. ___________ 9-4-2008 asp