IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.1657 of 2010 SANJEEV RAJAK, S/O DHANESHWAR RAJAK Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR **** /2/ 29.01.2010 Heard both the sides. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 397, 398, 307, 302 and 396 of the Indian Penal Code and 27, 25(1-B)A, 26 and 34 of the Arms Act. 3. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is not named in the first information report and during investigation he was suspected to have committed this occurrence since the police found that the petitioner was an accused in some other cases of similar nature so suspicion was cast against him and, thereafter, some witnesses stated that four or five days before the present occurrence the petitioner was involved in an other occurrence and, therefore, was involved also in the present case even though against him there is no cogent material, let the petitioner, above named, who is in custody since 21.10.2008 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (rupees five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with S.C. No. 102 of 2009 arising out of Khagaria P.S. Case No. 373 of 2008 to the satisfaction of the 2 Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, II, Khagaria, on the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the Court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the Court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse and (iii) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.A. (Anjana Prakash, J.)