1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR : O R D E R : S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6535/2007 (Smt. Kanchan Devi Vs. The State of Raj. & Ors.) Date of Order :: 08.09.2008 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr.S.Saruparia for the petitioner. Mr.V.K. Mathur, for U.O.I. Mr.Arjun Singh, Dy. Govt. Counsel. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In this case, petitioner is challenging acquisition proceedings for the land, which is said to be agricultural land, and upon which, there is contract arrived at between the petitioner and Archaeological Survey of India. Learned counsel for the petitioner is pointing out the fact that there is an agreement arrived at in between petitioner and the 2 Archaeological Survey of India for the purpose of utilizing the said land for the vehicles stand. It is further pointed out that vide letter dated 20th March, 2007 (Annexure-P/4) an agreement was arrived at for the purpose of contract of vehicle stand. Meaning thereby, although petitioner's land is agricultural land, but she is utilizing the said land for the commercial purpose, which is evident from the record itself. The State Government issued notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to acquire the said land for the tourism purpose, which is evident from Annexure-P/7. After issuing the said notification, an opportunity was given to petitioner to raise her objections. The petitioner raised all her objections vide Annexure-P/8. Thereafter, the notification under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act has been issued by the State Government vide notification dated 03rd September, 2007. In my opinion, the State Government has rightly proceeded to acquire the said land, which is said to be in possession of petitioner and petitioner is utilizing the said land for commercial purpose. 3 In this view of the matter, I see no reason to interfere with the acquisition proceedings. The petitioner will be entitled for compensation for the acquisition of her land in accordance with the Rules. Hence, writ petition is dismissed. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS),J. A.K. Chouhan/- A.K. Chouhan/-