1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1788 OF 2010 Hi-Tech Kamgar Sanghatana ....Petitioners V/s. Hi-Tech Plast Limited ....Respondent Mr.N.A. Kulkarni with Ms.Sangeeta Deo for the Petitioners. Mr.A.D. Patwardhan with Mr.T.R. Yadav for the Respondent. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 8TH MARCH, 2010. P.C. :- 1. The impugned order warrants no interference. There is no dispute that the units, to which the Petitioners members have been transferred, belonged to the Respondent. Merely because the units are different and at different locations, would not indicate that the employers are different. 2. The Industrial Court, has by the impugned order, considered the evidence produced by the Petitioners alleging mala-fides qua the transfer orders and rejected the same. The finding cannot be said to be perverse or even unreasonable. For instance, out of the eight employees who were granted permanency, only two have been transferred. The other six employees, who have not been transferred, are also the members of the union. There is no reason therefore to accept, especially at the 2 interlocutory stage, the allegations that the transfer was effected mala-fide on account of the said employees having joined the Petitioners’ union. 3. The Writ Petition is therefore dismissed.