IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 17267 of 1991 Date of Decision: March 25, 2009 Gajraj Singh Yadav ...... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr. A.S.Teeatia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.A.K.Gupta, Addl.AG, Haryana. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. The petitioner has challenged the order of imposing 5% cut in his pension on the ground that he was not given a chance to inspect the record which he had demanded so as to be able to file a reply. However, from the written statement it has been brought out that in response to the letter of the petitioner dated 3.8.89 the petitioner was sent a telegram dated 14.9.89 requiring him to inspect the record. However, neither the petitioner inspected the record nor he filed any reply. In this view of the matter I find that the allegation that the principles of natural justice were flouted by the respondents is not made out. Consequently this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE March 25 , 2009 sunita