IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3365 of 2011 Alamgir Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 04/- 27/07/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, who is armed with carbon copy of the case diary. In this case, instituted against unknown, petitioner’s name emerged during investigation on alleged recovery of a mobile phone from a jeep, where in huge quantity narcotic substances were loaded. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor from the case diary could not point out preparation of two seizures at to different time, one relating to narcotic substance and much, thereafter, another relating to recovery of such phone for which the petitioner a day before an occurrence lodged a complaint about its missing. Petitioner has no criminal antecedents. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the petitioner, namely, Alamgir, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Bochahan P.S. Case No. 92 of 2009, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for three years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in 2 case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)