IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA. CWP No. 3541 of 2009. Decided on: 23.2.2010. Manju Devi. …Petitioner. versus State of H.P. & ors. …Respondents. Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K.Vashista, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. R.K.Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General No. 1 to 3 with Mr. J.K.Verma, Dy. AG. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. The petitioner has been working as teacher on the basis of engagement by the Parents Teachers Association. She is aggrieved since she has been substituted by another teacher appointed on transfer by the third respondent. According to the petitioner, the fourth respondent is not liable to be transferred and posted in her place since the fourth respondent is a Para Teacher. We are informed that transfer has already taken effect, therefore, it will only be appropriate that the petitioner makes a representation before the third respondent, in which case, the third respondent will be in a position to look into the Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- matter and take appropriate action. In the event of the petitioner filing an appropriate representation before the third respondent within a period of two weeks from today, in which case, the third respondent will look into the matter and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of one month thereafter on production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the Writ Petition before the third respondent. With these observations, the petition is accordingly disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. ( Justice Kurian Joseph ), Chief Justice. ( R.B. Misra ), February 23, 2010 Judge. ( tr/ks)