IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17169 of 2010 FULAN CHAUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 7.7.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Renewing the prayer for bail in a Police case under Sections 302/34 of the Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, reliance is placed on a subsequent order of this Court dated 1.12.2009 in Cr. Misc. No. 41386 of 2009 granting bail to similarly situated co- accused. It does not appear from the latter that the earlier order of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 18334 of 2009 preferred by the petitioner was brought to the attention of the Court in Cr. Misc. No. 41386 of 2009. In any event, even according to the order in Cr. Misc. No. 41386 of 2009, the trial is on verge of conclusion and only the I.O and the Doctor are left to be examined. This Court is presently not persuaded to reconsider the prayer for bail at this belated stage. Places of posting of medical officers and police officers have already been furnished by the State Government departments to this Court which in turn have been forwarded to all District Judges on a C.D. 2 Let summons be issued to the official witnesses based on the information available therein of their places of posting. If the official witnesses do not respond to the summons, the trial Court is directed to initiate summary proceeding against them under Section 350 of the Cr. P.C. and conclude it at the earliest. If the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within the next three months, in the nature of the order for bail of the co-accused, the petitioner if so advised may renew his prayer for bail, enclosing complete copy of the order sheet of the trial Court as after today. The application is dismissed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)