IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 3643 of 2011. Decided on: May 30, 2011. Prem Singh. Versus State of H.P. & anr. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The Writ Petition is filed with the following prayer: “( i) That a writ of mandamus may very kindly be issued thereby directing the respondents to count the tenure services rendered by the petitioner from the date of initial appointment till the issuance of regularization order, for the purpose of annual increment and all consequential benefits of pay fixation etc. and the period may be treated as qualifying service for the purpose of pension benefits.” 2. According to the petitioner, the issue is covered in his favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP No. 4550 of 2010, Ravi Kumar Vrs. State of H.P. & another. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. The petitioner submits that he would file appropriate representation furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for him to do so. As and when the same is made, the second respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the second respondent. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. May 30, 2011. ( Justice Sanjay Karol), (vs) Judge. 2