1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4291 OF 2008 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4293 OF 2008 IN SECOND APPEAL ST. NO. 20957 OF 2007 Pandurang Viajinath Raut ...Applicant VERSUS Nivrutti Narayan Raut & ors. ...Respondents ..... Shri A.M.Hajare, advocate for the applicant None for the respondents. ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. DATED : 21 st January, 2011 PER COURT : 1 Heard learned counsel for the applicant. None for the respondents. 2 These are the applications preferred by the applicant for condonation of delay of 4678 days caused in filing the accompanying Second Appeal. It is stated in the applications that the applicant is an 2 illiterate physically handicapped and disabled person, who was not aware about the judicial proceedings, and therefore, delay was caused in filing the accompanying Second Appeal. 3 However, the afore said physical ailment referred in the applications cannot be construed as sufficient cause to condone the inordinate delay of 4678 days caused in filing the accompanying Second Appeal, and hence, present application deserves to be rejected. 4 Besides, it does not appear that the afore said delay is not willful, deliberate and intentional, and therefore, the present applications also bear no substance. 5 In the result, the present applications stand dismissed and leave to file accompanying Second Appeal stands refused. The court fee be refunded to the applicant/appellant as per Rules and present applications stand disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) dbm/ca4291.08