IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 448 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 448 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 448 OF 2007 Mokashi Aromas Pvt. Ltd & ors.... Petitioner versus The Dvl.Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies & ors...... Respondent. Shri Y.R.Shah for the petitioners Shri S.S.patwardhan for the respondents. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 6TH JULY, 2007 DATED; 6TH JULY, 2007 DATED; 6TH JULY, 2007 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. The grievance of the petitioner in this petition is that the Revisional Authoriy, which is ceased of a revision filed by the petiitoner under section 154, directed against the recovery certificate issued under section 101, is not considered the said revision and an application moved therein. It is clear from the record of the petition that as the petitioner had not deposited the anount as required under section 154(2)(A), the Revisional Authority is not entertaining the revision. Deposit of 50% of the amount covered by recovery certificate is a condition precedent for entertaining the revision. Hence there is no merit in the writ petiiton and it is dismissed. 2. If and in case the petitioner deposits the anount as mandated by section 154(2)(A) the revisional authority shall consider the revision on its on merit.