HIGH CCURT OF CHHATTSSGARH AT BILASPUR Sinaie Bench : Hon'bte Shrt DjIlBRaesaheb5eshmyi$h,A •JCl Deonath Nishad S/o Kheduram Nishad, aged about 45 yeare, R/o Village Damkadih, Post Hasda No.1, Thana Magariod, Tahsil Kurud, Distriot Dhamtari (C.G.) Sonu Nishad S/o Dheluram Nishad, aged - years, R/o Village Damkadih, Post Hasda No.1, Thana Magarlod, Tahsil Kupdd, Distriot Dhamtari (C.G.) Memorandum of appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Comaensation Act, 1923. Present : - Shri A. L. Singroul, counse! for the appeliant. ^»n<i l-1eard on l.A.No.1, wliich is an application for condonation of delay in filing this appeai. (2) For the reasons meniioned in the appiioation, it is allowed and the delay in fiiing this appeai is condoned. (3) Heard on admission. (4) This is a claimant's appeal against the order of reieotion of applicatlon under Seotion 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (henceforth 'the Act, 1923") by order dated 17-10-2007 passed by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Labour Court, Raipur (henceforth "th.e Commissioner") in Case No.166M/.C.Act/2001-Fatal on the ground that the application was barred by limitation. (5) The Commissioner has dismissed the application on the ground that although the workmen had died due to the accident occumng on 15-06-1998, the appiication under Section 30 of the Act, 1923 was filed on 12-07-2001. (6) Learned counsel for the appellant did not dispute that the appiicatton under Section 30 ofthe Act, 1923 was barred by !imitation. (7) No substantial question of law is thus involved in this appeai which is accordinglydismissed atthestage ofadmission. g^. Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge Tumane