IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27196 of 2009 FULIA KHATOON Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.08.2009 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. On the previous occasion unable to persuade the Court the application was withdrawn to avoid suffering an adverse order, under Section 304 B IPC. In this renewed application made nearly eight months later it is submitted that in the meantime the husband of the petitioner has been acquitted after trial. This Court has gone through the judgement of acquittal which is barely in one and half page. Apart from the same, the petitioner remained an absconder after the earlier rejection. She cannot seek an advantage for protection in law on her own misdemeanour in having disobeyed the law. Any application for regular bail has to be decided on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. This application is rejected. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)