IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. App. No. 479 of 2008 Venu Lawai & others. ……… Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand & another. ………. Respondents Mr. B.M. Pingal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Government Advocate for respondent No. 1. Ms. Prabha Noliyal, Advocate for respondent No. 2. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. CRMA No. 574 of 2008: Through the medium of this application, the petitioners and respondent No. 2 have prayed for compounding of the offences and for disposal of the main petition on the ground that the parties have compromised. Actually, it has been stated at the Bar that respondent No. 2 has since married petitioner No. 2 and both are living happily together. The application is supported by the individual affidavits of petitioner No. 2 and respondent No. 2. For the reasons stated, the application is allowed. The offences are compounded. C482 No. 479 of 2008 is allowed and disposed of. Because of the compounding, the proceedings forming the subject matter of the petition are hereby quashed with all the consequences. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 25.07.2008 G