WP(C) 6076/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE H. BARUAH. Heard Mr. S. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. M. Gogoi Medhi, l earned standing counsel, Education Department. Since Ms. M. Gogoi, Medhi has accepted notice on behalf of all the respondents, no formal notice need be issued. As agreed to by the learned counsel for both the parties, this matter is taken u p for final disposal at the motion stage. In the writ petition, the petitioner herein states that his father Late Babu Cha nd Barman was working as Assistant Teacher at Bagribari M. E. School. While he was serving in the said school, he expired on 14-10-2003 leaving behind his othe r family members. However, after death of his father, he being an unemployed son filed application/representation before the respondent authority for his appoin tment to the post of Assistant Teacher under Die-in-Harness scheme, but the appr opriate authority till date has not taken any decision with regard to the claim of the petitioner. Mr. S. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner by referring to the case of Ach yut Ranjan Das & Ors Vs. State of Assam & Ors, reported in 2006 (4) GLT 674 cont ends that this court while disposing of the batch of writ petitions of the ident ical nature formulated some guidelines for disposal of the applications for appo intment on compassionate ground. The learned counsel has also placed reliance on the decision of this court rendered in Faziron Nessa & Ors Vs. State of Assam & Ors, reported in 2010 (4) GLT 340, wherein the view adopted in Achyut Ranjan Da s & Ors has been reiterated. Since the petitioner on account of death of his father filed an application/repr esentation before the appropriate authority to appoint him on compassionate grou nd, the same also requires disposal by the appropriate authority following the g uidelines as provided in Achyut Ranjan Das & Ors (supra). In that view of the matter, this Court also directs the respondent authority to dispose of the application/representation submitted by the petitioner remaining within the parameters of the guidelines as formulated by this court in the case of Achyut Ranjan Das & Ors(supra). It is informed at the Bar that the District Level Committee meeting will be held in the month of December, 2010 and this being the information as provided, it i s directed that the respondent authority shall consider the same in the District Level Committee meeting to be held in the month of December, 2010. With the above observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed o f.