T.A.No.190 of 2009 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH T.A.No.190 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 28.5.2009 Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd.(PUNSUP) .... Applicant Versus M/s Tilak Raj Madan Mohan Rice Mills ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Ms.Deepali Puri, Advocate for the applicant. ... MAHESH GROVER, J. The only apprehension that has been expressed for transfer of case titled as “M/s Tilak Raj Madan Mohan Rice Mills v. PUNSUP”, pending in the Court of District Judge, Kapurthala is as follows :- “That the fact that although the respondent/objector was given a period of almost three years for concluding his evidence and the court has given only three dates to the applicant to lead its evidence has given a reasonable apprehension in its mind that no justice will be done to the applicant and as such the applicant has lost faith in the said court. Moreover, even the respondent-firm has filed Civil Revision 2426 of 2009 challenging the order of the said T.A.No.190 of 2009 (O&M) -2- court vide which its evidence was closed and the same is fixed for 11.8.2009 in this Hon'ble Court.” I am afraid, the Court which is seized of the matter is entirely free to proceed in accordance with the law and to determine as to how many opportunities are required to be given to a litigant before it. Simply because three adjournments have been given to the applicant, it cannot be termed to be an indication of bias for the applicant. No ground. Dismissed. 28.5.2009 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss