IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 3679 of 2011. Decided on: 24th May, 2011. Rattan Lal ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and Ors. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Lovneesh Kanwar, Advocate. For the respondents-State: Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Annexure P-1 is the order of transfer. According to the petitioner, he has only a few months to retire from service. It is seen that he had submitted Annexure P-2, representation before the third respondent to the effect that he may not be transferred on the eve of his retirement. There will be a direction to the third respondent to look into Annexure P-2, representation and take appropriate action thereon in accordance with law, justice and equity. This shall be done within a period of one week from the date of production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner. In case, the petitioner has not been relieved as on today and the fifth respondent has not joined duty, proceedings for relieving the petitioner shall be deferred for the time being. Needless to say, the parties to the writ petition in that event will work in their respective places prior to the impugned order till the decision is taken on Annexure P-2 by the third respondent. 2 3. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. Copy dasti in two days. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 24th May, 2011 ( Justice Sanjay Karol ), (c/rana) Judge.