IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2411 OF 2008 Eknath Bayaji Gadkari ... Petitioner Vs. Union of India and another. ... Respondents Mr. G.S. Godbole with Mr. S.S. Redekar for the petitioner. Mr. A.J. Rana, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kiran Kandpile for the respondent No.1. Mr. M.I. Sethna with Mr. L.S. Shetty i/by M/s. L.S. Shetty & Associates for the respondent No.2. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATE : 25TH FEBRUARY, 2009 P.C.: The learned counsel appearing for the parties have filed consent Minutes of Order signed by the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties. The same is taken on record and marked “X” for identification purposes. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the Union of India submits that the competent officer i.e. Under Secretary to the Government of India is also present in court who has approved the consented Minutes of Order. 3. Writ petition is disposed of in terms of the consent terms marked “X”. We make it clear that these are merely the consented Minutes of Order agreed upon between the parties and court has not adjudicated upon any of the terms or their applications. It should be clearly understood that the court has not decided any of the terms or their merit. CHIEF JUSTICE DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.