GPN-J-332-ARHCB-8_94-13,10,500-ALA4. SPL.H.C.A.S.C.D. 79e. FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2124 OF 1998 APPLICATION NO. 2124 OF 1998 APPLICATION NO. 2124 OF 1998 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri J.C.Satpute for the applicant. Mrs. U.V.Kejariwal APP for State CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & SMT. SMT. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DTAED; DTAED; DTAED; 8TH APRIL, 2005 8TH APRIL, 2005 8TH APRIL, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. In view of the fact that the acquittal is recorded in the year 1998 and the appeal against acquittal is coming in the year 2005, we see that it would be unjustifiable and unreasonable to take up the cause again after the passage of so much time. The acquittal is ordered granting benefit of doubt to the accused. In such circumstances, we see no reason to interfere. Application for leave to appeal is rejected. ....