IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC SATURDAY, THE 19TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 28TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 30845 of 2011(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- M.UMMER @ UMMER MADHUVAI, S/O.UNNIMAMMAD MULLA, AREEKKAD PARAMBU HOUSE, KANJIRAPARAMBU, POST CALICUT AIRPORT, KONDOTTY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.RAMADAS RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, NEAR JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, PALARIVATTOM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682025. 2. THE SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT, KERALA WAKF BOARD REGIONAL OFFICE, CONVENT ROAD, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673 001. 3. MUHAMMED SALIH @ SHAIK ABUTHABU RAHMAN SHA VALIYA THANGAL, S/O.MUHAMMED SHAH THANGAL, KONDOTTY THAKKIYA, KONDOTTY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673 638. SRI.A.A.ABUL HASSAN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.30845/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P-1 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 18-1-2001 BEFORE THE CHAIRMAN OF THE WAKF BOARD. EXT.P-2 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 22-1-2001 FROM 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P-3 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 18-7-2002 FROM THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P-4 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 05.10.2003 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P-5 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 08.04.2004 BEFORE THE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE WAKF BOARD. EXT.P-6 A TRUE COPY OF THE NEWS ITEM PUBLISHED IN THE 'MADHYAMAM' DAILY DATED 20-7-04. EXT.P-7 TRUE COPY OF THE NEWS ITEM APPEARED IN THE 'CHANDRIKA' DAILY DATED 20-7-04. EXT.P-8 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT DATED 01.12.2006 IN WPC NO. 36175/2004. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 30845 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 19th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T Complaining of improper management of a wakf by name “Kondotty Thakkiya”, petitioner approached the 1st respondent by filing Exts.P4 and P5. According to the petitioner, after several postings, the matter was heard on 13/10/10 and the case now stands posted for orders on 17/1/2012. Petitioner says that having regard to the urgency of the situation, orders shall be passed expeditiously. It is with this prayer, the writ petition is filed. 2. I heard the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents who points out the heavy work load of the 1st respondent and requests for six months time. 3. Although the heavy work load as pointed out by the counsel justifies the request for reasonable time, since this is a case where the matter was already heard, I direct that final orders shall be passed at any rate within three months from today. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp //True Copy// PA to Judge