IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 9th day of February, 2010 I Bail Application No. 128 of 2010 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE Seesh Ram S/o Hirday Ram R/o Village Lathardeva Sheikh P.S. Jhabreda, Tehsil Roorkee, Distt. Haridwar. ………… Applicant Versus S tate of Uttarakhand ………… Opposite Party Arising out of Crime No. 76 of 2009 Under Sections: 304-B of I.P.C. Police Station: Jhabreda District: Haridwar. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate present for the applicant. Mr. Nandan Arya, A.G.A. present for the State. Applicant Seesh Ram, who is in jail in connection with Crime No. 76 of 2009, relating to offence punishable under Section 304-B of I.P.C., police station Jhabreda, District Haridwar, has sought his release on bail. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Applicant is father-in-law of the deceased. It is pleaded on behalf of the applicant that he lives separately from his son Sachin and the deceased (Sachin’s wife). It is further pointed out that in the first information report it is alleged that the deceased was throttled, but the postmortem report shows that cause of death could not be ascertained. No specific role has been assigned to the applicant in the first information report. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail. Let the applicant Seesh Ram be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee. [ (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt. 09.02.2010 H.Negi