CWP No. 17461 of 2007 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 17461 of 2007 Date of Decision: 21.1.2008 Union of India and others ......Petitioners Versus Vinod Kumar and another ....Respondents Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHINDER PAL Present: Ms. Renu Bala Sharma, Central Govt. Standing Counsel, for the petitioners. Shri H.S. Saini, Advocate, for respondent No.1. HEMANT GUPTA, J. The present writ petition is directed against the order Annexure P.13 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as `the Tribunal') on 23.7.2007, whereby the learned tribunal has directed the present petitioners to confer temporary status to respondent No.1 under the Casual Labourers (Grant of Temporary Status & Regularisation) Scheme, 1993. Learned counsel for the petitioners admits that the order passed by the Tribunal, has since been implemented and benefit of temporary status has been conferred on the respondent No.1. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 has referred to Director General, Doordarshan, Mandi House, New Delhi v. Manas Dey, 2005(13) SCC 437, wherein the grant of temporary status to the casual employees on completion of 240 days of work in a year or 206 days (in CWP No. 17461 of 2007 (2) case of offices observing 5 days a week), has been found to be maintainable. In view of the aforesaid judgment, we do not find any illegality in the impugned order passed by the learned Tribunal. Hence, the present petition is dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 21-01-2008 (MOHINDER PAL) ds JUDGE