..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.314 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1902 OF 2007 Guruswarup Srivastava. ..Applicant. Versus State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors. ..Respondents. .... Mr.J.P.Cama, Sr.Counsel i/b. Mr.D.M.Galani, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.A.S.Shitole, APP, for the State. Ms.Ralina Manoj, Adv. for respondent No.3-CBI. .... WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1902 OF 2007 Central Bureau of Investigation. ..Petitioner. -Versus- Shri Sh.Guru Swarup Srivastava and Anr. ..Respondents. .... Ms.Ralina Manoj, Adv. for petitioner-CBI. Mr.J.P.Cama, Sr.Counsel i/b. Mr.D.M.Galani, Adv. for the Respondent No.1. Mr.A.S.Shitole, APP, for the State. .... ALONG WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.315 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1889 OF 2007 Guruswarup Srivastava. ..Applicant. Versus ..(2).. State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors. ..Respondents. .... Mr.J.P.Cama, Sr.Counsel i/b. Mr.D.M.Galani, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.A.S.Shitole, APP, for the State. Ms.Ralina Manoj, Adv. for respondent No.3-CBI. .... WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1889 OF 2007 National Agricultural Co.op. Marketing Federation of India Ltd. (NAFED) ..Petitioner. -Versus- The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ..Respondents. .... Ms.Ralina Manoj, Adv. for respondent No.3-CBI. Mr.J.P.Cama, Sr.Counsel i/b. Mr.D.M.Galani, Adv. for the Respondent No.2. Mr.Y.M.Nakhwa, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 22nd October, 2008. DATED : 22nd October, 2008. DATED : 22nd October, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard both sides. 2. Being aggrieved by the order of the learned ACMM, 19th Court, Esplanade, Mumbai in C.B.I. Case No.RC 7/E/2006/CBI/EOW/MUMBAI, the petitioner filed ..(3).. revision application Nos.896 of 2007 and 897 of 2007 before the learned Special Court. The said Revisions came to be dismissed by the learned Special Judge for Greater Mumbai by order dated 27.9.2007 on the ground that as the order of the learned Magistrate is an interlocutory order, no revision is maintainable. 3. All the parties are agreed that in view of the decision of the Division Bench of this Court dated 15th July, 2008 in Writ Petition No.1531 of 2006 in the case of D’damas Jewellery India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors., revisions against the order of the Magistrate are maintainable. All the parties are willing to pursue the said revisions before the Sessions Court. In view of the facts of the present case and the decision of this Court in D’damas Jewellery (supra), the order dated 27.9.2007 is set-aside and the revisions stand revived. The learned Special Judge shall hear the matter afresh and decide the same on merit as expeditiously as possible. Interim relief granted by this Court to continue for a period of seven weeks from today. 4. Criminal Applications and Writ Petitions are disposed of accordingly. ..(4).. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)