IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34148 of 2009 JAGARNATH MUKHIYA @ JAGARNATH MUKHIA, son of Shri Utim Lal Mukhiya, GramSevak, Panchayat Secretary Sankorth, P.S. Pandaul (Sarisaupahi), Distt. Madhubani, permanent resident of Village Maibi, P.S. Lakhnaur, Distt. Madhubani ---PETITIONER Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 30.11.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a police case for the alleged offences registered under sections 467, 468, 471, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that a frivolous case has been filed against the petitioner, who is the Panchayat Sachiv along with other co-accused Ram Kripal Yadav, who is the Mukhiya and others. It is submitted that there was no irregularity in the appointment of Shiksha Mitra. The matter was inquired and the allegation was found not correct. As a matter of fact, the informant himself was not eligible for appointment. It is further submitted that co-accused Ram Kripal Yadav with similar allegations has been allowed bail as per the order dated 22.4.2008 passed in Cr.Misc. No.52085 of 2007, as contained in Annexure 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Pandaul (Sarsaupahi) P.S. Case No.35 of 2006 within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on 2 furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)