IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DECEMBER 2010 / 17TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 RP.No. 841 of 2010() ---------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN INS.APP.NO.52/2008 Dated 18/06/201 IC. NO.9/2005 OF EMPLOYEES' INSURANCE COURT, PALAKKAD. .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------------------------------------- E.S.I. CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS REGIONAL DIRECTOR, ROUND NORTH, THRICHUR. BY ADVS. SRI.T.V.AJAYAKUMAR SMT. SREEJA.K.K. RESPONDENT(S): APPELLANT --------------------------------------------- M/S. NANDILATH AGENCIES, KURUPPAM ROAD, THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, N.G.GOPALAKRISHNAN. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: tss M.N. KRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.P. 841 OF 2010 IN Ins.Appl. NO. 52 OF 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 8th day of December, 2010 O R D E R This review petition is filed to review the judgment dated 18th June, 2010. The review petition is filed on the ground that if the remand is carried out it will work out injustice to the review petitioner and there is a possibility of the applicant's establishment manipulating the documents to protract the litigation. I have considered the matter in paragraph 3 of my judgment wherein I have stated that lacuna cannot be permitted to be filled but I was reminded of the fact that it was a case where earlier, clubbing was not permitted and the present clubbing is on the basis of change of circumstances. Therefore this Court found that the developments subsequent to the earlier R.P. 841 OF 2010 IN Ins.Appl. NO. 52 OF 2008 -:2:- decision is absolutely relevant for a determination and therefore I granted an opportunity. I do not find any error apparent on the face of the records which requires correction by exercising the review jurisdiction. Therefore the R.P. lacks merit and the same is dismissed. But it is made clear that the validity or invalidity or correctness or incorrectness of the documents are all matters which can be considered by the E.S.I. Court when appropriate objections are raised to that effect. Sd/- M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/- [true copy] P.A. To Judge.