IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40414 of 2009 1. KAMLESHWARI PANDIT SON OF LATE BANKU PANDIT 2. SATIYA DEVI WIFE OF LATE BOUKU PANDIT. BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SIKKAT, P.S. BARARI (SEMAPUR) DISTRICT - KATIHAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 18.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The offence alleged is under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner nos. 1 and 2 are husband and mother-in-law of the complainant. It is further submitted that petitioners have been implicated in this case for ulterior purpose. As a matter of fact, petitioners are ready to keep the complainant. It is the complainant who is not ready to live with the petitioners and is desirous to live at her parental home. It is further submitted that petitioners have filed a petition for restitution of conjugal rights. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Katihar in connection with Complaint Case No. 2129 of 2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)