IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 220 of 2004 Date of decision: 06.12.2010. The National Insurance Co. Ltd. …Petitioner. Versus Gagan Kumar and others …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Deepak Gupta, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner: Mr. Deepak Bhasin, Advocate. For the respondents: None. Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral) 1. The awarded amount in this case is Rs.6,300/- only. Even, in case the petition of the Insurance Company is to be allowed the matter will have to be remanded to the learned trial Court for re-assessment of the damages. Since the amount involved is very low, the Insurance Company would have been well advised not to file the petition. 2. It appears that this petition was only filed because there are many petitions arising out of the accident. In case, on quantum the petition has to be allowed the matter will have to be remanded to the learned trial Court for reassessment of the damages. Keeping in view the amount involved, I 1 Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes. 2 feel that no purpose will be served in remanding the case. The petition is accordingly rejected. It is made clear that the dismissal of the petition shall not be taken as a precedent in other cases arising out of the same accident. No order as to costs. 6th December, 2010 (Deepak Gupta) ™ Judge