IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 2699/2009 Decided on:16.8.2010 _____________________________________________ Smt. Gandhari. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Neeraj K. Sahrma, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. for respondents No.1 to 4. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). It is jointly represented by the learned counsel for the parties that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court rendered in CWP No. 1611 of 2007, Pinku Ram versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others and other connected matters, decided on 22.4.2010. Consequently, the matter is remanded to the Inquiry Committee as visualized in the judgment mentioned hereinabove. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 In the light of above, the petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 16.8.21010 *awasthi*