THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR C.M.A. No. 967 of 2010 Judgment: This C.M.A. is directed against the order dated 11.10.2010, passed by the II Additional District Judge, Mahabubnagar, allowing the application in I.A. No. 78 of 2010 in O.S. No. 22 of 2010, filed by the respondent-plaintiff, praying to grant ex parte ad interim injunction. Though the appellant-defendant assailed the impugned order on merits, but having perused the same, we are not inclined to interfere the same, because the impugned order of ad interim injunction, is conditional in nature, in that the Court below while restraining the appellant-defendant from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petition schedule property, made it clear that the respondent-plaintiff should get ready with the trial of the suit within one month, failing which the temporary injunction granted in his favour, would sand vacated. It is the admitted case of the appellant-defendant that even though the impugned order ad interim injunction was passed on 11.10.2010, and even though more than one month has expired, the trial of the suit has not commenced. That being so, we are of the opinion that by operation of the default clause, the impugned ad interim injunction order granted by the Court below in favour of the respondent-plaintiff, automatically, stood vacated. Hence, while refusing to interfere with the impugned ad interim injunction order, which automatically stood vacated by operation of the default clause, we direct the Court below to dispose of the suit itself expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Both the parties shall co-operate with the disposal of the suit. Accordingly, the C.M.A. is disposed of. No costs. ________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. _______________________ B. CHANDRA KUMAR, J. Dated: 24th November, 2010 KSR