IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22406 of 2010 KARI SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04/ 29.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and during the course of investigation his name surfaced and he was arrested in this case on 12.7.2002 and he made his confessional statement. Except the above stated circumstances, there is nothing against the petitioner. Although petitioner carries criminal history but the report of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge FTC 5, Motihari, East Champaran reveals that up till now charge has not been framed against the petitioner and trial court is not in a position to say as to how much time will be consumed by him in concluding the trial of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of detention of petitioner in judicial custody, I direct him( (Kari Sah) to be released on bail in connection with Paharpur P.S. Case no. 148 of 2001 on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000-/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Sessions Judge-cum-FTC V, Motihari in Sessions Trial no. 829/2004 subject to the condition that one of the sureties must be close relative of the petitioner and holder of the landed property. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)