IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.51691 of 2008 1. Laxman Rai, son of Late Khelawan Rai, 2. Ram Baran Rai, son of Late Hitan Rai, 3. Sanjay Patel, son of Sri Kishori Patel, 4. Gagandeo Rai, son of Late Firan Rai, village Dhadhi, PS Nanpur, Dist. Sitamarhi.. Petitioner. vs. The State of Bihar. 2 3.2.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this bail petition filed on behalf of petitioner no.1 Laxman Rai on the ground that he has already been arrested in this case. This application is dismissed so far as petitioner no.1 is concerned. Heard the parties. The petitioners are accused in a case under sections 341, 323, 325 and 504/34 of the Penal Code and section 3(x)(xi) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegations are false and that no occurrence took place. It is further submitted that the caste name was not taken in public view and, thus, provisions of the SC/ST Act is not attracted in this case. Besides this, learned counsel refers to Annexure 3 which is an order passed in a Cr. Writ petition showing that petitioner no.1’s daughter was kidnapped by the son of the informant and was later recovered and it is for this reason that the present case has been instituted. Considering the aforesaid submissions, petitioners 2, 3 and 4 are directed to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks in Nanpur PS 2 Case No. 91/2008 on furnishing bail bonds of rupees ten thousand each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Pupri, District Sitamarhi subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P. C. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)