1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9473 OF 2010 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.169 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3669 OF 2010 Sunil Ramakant Bajgamwar ..APPLICANT VERSUS Khajamiya Maqdumsab & ors. ..RESPONDENTS Mr P.R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate for the applicant; Mr S.S. Thombre, Advocate for respondents no.1 to 4; Mrs A.V. Gondhalekar, A.G.P. for respondent no.5. CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND N.D. DESHPANDE,JJ. DATE : 9th August, 2010 PER COURT : This is an application filed by the respondents to this Letters Patent Appeal seeking review of the order of this Court dated 25.6.2010, particularly the relief granted at paragraph 4 of the aforesaid order. The learned Single Judge of this Court while partly allowing the writ petitions filed by the petitioners quashed and set aside the order of the Collector and directed a de novo inquiry to be conducted by the Collector of certain issues which were made clear by the learned Single Judge at paragraph 13 (C), (D) and (E) of the impugned order. The learned Single Judge vide directions at paragraph 13 (F) and (G) directed that the office held by the present appellants shall be kept vacant till the inquiry is concluded and by virtue of paragraph 13 (G) permitted the petitioners therein i.e. the present appellants to attend the meeting of the Municipal Council, but 2 restrained them from casting any vote and also directed that they should not be appointed on any post during the pendency of the election dispute. The respondent herein has also filed Letters Patent Appeal No.190 of 2010 in which the respondent herein has challenged the judgment passed by the learned Single Judge quashing and setting aside order of the Collector and directing the de novo inquiry. 2. We, therefore, allow the present application and substitute paragraph 4 of our order with the following paragraph :- "There shall be an interim relief to the directions of the learned Single Judge of this Court contained at paragraph 13 (F) and (G). It is made clear that the Collector may proceed with the inquiry but shall not deliver the judgment pursuant to the directions issued by the learned Single Judge till the decision of this Letters Patent Appeal." 3. Since copies have been issued to the parties, a fresh copy of this order be issued to the parties afresh. 4. This appeal, therefore, be set down for hearing in the week commencing from 30th August, 2010. 5. Civil Application allowed as indicated above with no order as to costs. (N.D. DESHPANDE, J.) ( P.V.HARDAS, J.) amj/ca9473.10