IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5830 OF 2005 ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.5832 OF 2005 ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.5833 OF 2005 ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.5846 OF 2005 (Abdul Rehman Mustafa Madoo & Anr. Vs. Shakeel Fazal Madoo & Anr.) ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:------------------------------------ Mr.A.R.Shaikh for the petitioners. Ms.Asha Bhambwani for respondent no.1. in all petitions. Mrs.Nasreen Ayubi for respondent no.2. in all petitions. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED: 7TH OCTOBER, 2005 DATED: 7TH OCTOBER, 2005 DATED: 7TH OCTOBER, 2005 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Ms.Bhambwani, learned counsel for respondent no.1, on instructions, submits that all the four suits filed by respondent no.1 are in respect of house No.109 of which respondent nos.2 in all the writ petitions are tenants and not in respect of house no.111. Mr.Shaikh, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that respondent nos.2 are not tenants in house no.109 but they are tenants in house no.111 and, therefore, the suit cannot be decreed against these tenants. In view of the statement made by Mr.Shaikh, Ms.Bhambwani submits that respondent no.1 shall not execute decree, if passed against respondent nos.2 in all the four petitions in respect of house no.111. In view of a caterogic statement made by Ms.Bhambwani, Mr.Shaikh submits that these petitions be disposed of as not pressed. Order accordingly. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)