...-•^:^E !j" ,^.^,, ^S.^ J ;^i':i3$-' Kl[-iv" HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRTT PETITION (C) No. 5410 of2008 PETITIONERS : 1. Shri Rawatpura SaAar Institute of Phannacv. Throuah its Principal, Rawatpura Sarkar Institute of Pharmacv, behind Hlidav Resort, village Chorha- Kumhari, Distt. Dure fChhattissarh) earlier known as Shri Rawatpura Sarkar Intemational Institute, Department of Pharmacy, Kumhari, Distt. Dur^ (Cfahattisgarh) 2. Shri Rawatpura Saikar Lok Kalvan Trust, throu^i the Manasing Tmstee, Shri Rawatpura Sarkar Lok Kalyan Tmst, Hoiiday Resort, villaee chorha, Kumhari, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Department of Technical Education, Mantralava, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisearh) 2. Director, Technical Education. Govt. of Ctihattisearh. Umend Polvtechnic Compound, Byron Bazar, Raipur (Chhattisearh) 3. Chhattisgarh Swami Vivekanatid Technical University, fhrough its Registrar, Clihattisgarh Swami Vivekanand Technical University, Bhilai, Durg (Chhattisgarh) WRH' PETITION LWDER AR'HCLE 226 OF THE CONSTITLTTION OF INDIA RESPONDENTS ^E. r "',•'"--% x -2- •^j'nr SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Asmhotn, J. Shri Saryay K. Agrawal, Advocate tbrthe forthe petitioner. Shri Alok Bakshi, GoveriBnent Advocate for the State/ respondent No. 1 & 2 Shri Y.S.Thakur, Advocate forthe respoudent No. 3. (Passed on 26th day of September, 2008) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioaers institute have obtained approval from all the agencies namely AU India Council For Technical Education and Director, Technical Education. ITie application (AnnexureP4) and represMitation (Annexure P/6) of the petitioners for grant of afBliation is pendins consideration before the respondent No. 3. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondent No. 3 submits tbat the above stated application and representation of the petitioners shall be considered in accordance with law, on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period oftwo weeks from the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. 3. Shri Agrawal submits fhat in view oftiie foregoing, nothing survives for adjudication. 4. Accordinsly, the petition stands disposed. No order asto costs. J^- Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge il