IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41480 of 2008 1. SABITA DEVI WIFE OF RRAMOD MANDAL 2. MUKESH MANDAL, SON OF PRAMOD MANDAL BOTH REDIDENTS OF VILLAGE BHITTI, P.S. SHAMBHUGANJ, DISTRICT BANKA ----------------------PETITIONERS. Versus STATE OF BIHAR--------------------OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- 03. 17.11.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are accused in a case under Section 302 and other allied Sections of the Penal Code. They are named in the First Information Report and are alleged to have wielded lathi along with others named in the F.I.R. causing death of Shyamdeo Mandal. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that petitioner no. 1 is a lady and petitioner no.2 is her son who is a disabled person and his disability is such that the allegation of wielding lathi is absolutely incorrect. Let the physical disability of petitioner no. 2 be examined by the C.J.M., Banka and if he is satisfied that the disability of petitioner no. 2 is such that he could not have wielded lathi then petitioner no.2 be also admitted to the privilege of bail. So far petitioner no. 1 is concerned, she being a lady, namely, Sabita Devi is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional District Judge, FTC, IV, Banka in connection with S.T. No. 783 of 2008(Shambhuganj P.S. Case No. 22 of 2008). Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha,J.)