IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM TUESDAY, THE 3RD AUGUST 2010 / 12TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 21406 of 2010 (A) --------------------------------- RCRP.1/2008 of ADDL. DISTRICT COURT-I, PALAKKAD RCP.18/1993 of MUNSIFF COURT, OTTAPPALAM .................... PETITIONER(S): ------------------ 1. K.C.INDIRA, W/O.NARAYANA VAIDYAR 2. CHAVARENKIL NARAYANA VAIDYAR BOTH ARE RESIDING AT ARIYOOR THEKKUMURI DESOM OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON SRI.JIBU P THOMAS SRI.P.S.APPU SRI.C.A.ANOOP RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. LEKHA JAYADEVAN , W/O.LATE JAYADEVAN 2. RAHUL JAYADEVAN, S/O. LATE JAYADEVAN 3. GOKUL JAYADEVAN, S/O. LATE JAYADEVAN ALL ARE RESIDING AT SANKARAN KUMARATH KANNAMKULANGARA, KOORKKANCHERI, THRISSUR. ADV. SMT.D.P.RENU FOR R1-3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & C. K. ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ W. P. C. No.21406 of 2010 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 3rd day of August, 2010 JUDGMENT Pius C. Kuriakose, J It is submitted by the learned senior counsel appearing for the parties that on 29/07/10 the parties have filed joint compromise petition I.A.10790/10. Along with compromise petition they have also produced a site plan of the petition schedule property. It is stated in the compromise petition that the respondents in the Writ Petition have taken delivery of the petition schedule property having an extent of 12.5 cents along with the house situated thereon on 29/07/10 and demarcated the same with compound walls based W. P. C. No.21406 of 2010 -2- on the consensus arrived at between the parties. It is also stated that the extent and side measurements of the properties delivered over pursuant to the compromise is shown in the appended sketch. It is further stated in the compromise petition that the compound wall constructed by the Writ Petitioners on the Northern side abutting the new construction made by them is to be maintained by them and the remaining compound wall are to be maintained by the respondents. It is further stated that hereafter the parties do not have any monetary or other claims against each other. The compromise is lawful. We record the compromise. We mark the sketch produced along with the compromise petition as Ext.C1. We dispose of the Writ Petition W. P. C. No.21406 of 2010 -3- in terms of the compromise. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE C. K. ABDUL REHIM JUDGE kns/-