IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No.4647 of 2009 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 16.4.2009 Neelam Santoriya ...Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana & Others …Respondents CORAM HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI PRESENT: Mr.Madan Pal, Advocate for the petitioner Permod Kohli, J. (Oral) At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to Clerical and inadvertent mistake, the address of respondent no.3 has been wrongly mentioned at Chandigarh whereas it should have been at Faridabad. He seeks leave of this Court to make necessary corrections. Prayer is allowed. Correction made in the Open Court. Notice of motion. On the asking of this Court, Mr.SS Dohan, Advocate CWP No.4647 of 2009 (O&M) :2: accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Keeping in view the nature of controversy and the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of at the motion stage itself. The petitioner was allotted Plot No.1576, Sector 65, Faridabad vide allotment letter dated 29.10.2001 (Annexure P-1). It is alleged that the petitioner has not been informed about the amount due and payable against the said plot, despite various requests made in this regard. The petitioner has already made a number of applications vide Annexures P-5 to P-8 and a reminder (Annexure P-9), but of no avail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if the respondents are directed to consider the representations and take a decision thereon. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents to inform the petitioner the amount due and payable by her against the aforesaid plot within a period of four weeks from today. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 16.4.2009 MFK