Civil Revision No.2395 of 2011 (O&M) 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No.2395 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 7.4.2011 Rambir ......petitioner Versus CCC HAU, Hisar through its Registrar and another .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr. Pardeep P.Chahar, Advocate for the petitioner. **** SABINA, J. Plaintiff-petitioner has filed a suit for declaration that he was eligible and entitled to undergo the course of Veterinary and Livestock Development (VLD) Diploma being conducted by the defendants. Along with the suit, plaintiff filed an application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure for interim injunction. Vide order dated 10.11.2010, trial Court dismissed the application for temporary injunction. The said order was upheld in appeal by the Additional District Judge vide order dated 9.12.2010. Hence, the present petition by the plaintiff-petitioner. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the present petition deserves to be dismissed. Admittedly, the plaintiff was appointed as a Chowkidar in Animal Husbandry Department, Delhi w.e.f. 30.6.1995. A Chowkidar Civil Revision No.2395 of 2011 (O&M) 2 is not admissible for admission against the additional seat. The plaintiff disclosed himself as a Bull Attendant w.e.f. 30.6.1995 while applying for the course. However, the plaintiff had been designated as a Bull Attendant on 6.4.2009. Since the plaintiff had not stated correct facts while applying for the course and had got admission by mis-stating the facts, the application moved by the plaintiff for temporary injunction was liable to be dismissed. Hence, no ground for interference by this Court is made out. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. (SABINA) JUDGE April 07, 2011 anita