IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4329 of 2010 PANCHU SAH, S/o Shivram Sah. Versus THE SATTE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 17.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 363A, 448, 323, 368 and 380/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is an agnate of the informant against whom there is an allegation that he kidnapped his minor son about five months ago. Thereafter, the boy aged about seventeen years gave his statement saying that he had been forcibly taken away by the present petitioner and others about one and half years ago and forced to work as a labour in Punjab and when he was caught by the police on his return home he has given the statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. Under the circumstances. Let the petitioner above named who is in custody since 06.11.2009 and has no criminal antecedent be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like - 2 - amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case No. 123 of 2008 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)