1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Sixth day of April Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr. Justice M.SATHYANARAYANAN CRL OP(MD) No.4020 of 2011 SELVI ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED Vs STATE THROUGH INSPECTOR OF POLICE CCB, POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.21/2008, U/S. 120(B), 465, 467, 468, 420, 419, 471 IPC ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. J.GUNASHEELAN MUTHIAH Advocate For Respondent : MR.L.MURUGAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is arrayed as an accused in C.C.R.No.54 of 2010 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli and apprehend in pursuant to the non-bailable warrant issued on 25.03.2010, and hence, he seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner along with other accused are charged for the commission of offence under Sections 120(b), 465, 467, 468, 420, 419 and 417 I.P.C. The learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the petitioner was enlarged on bail in the event of arrest vide order dated 06.11.2008 in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.9636 of 2008 and she was complying with the conditions subsequent to the filing of the charge sheet and taken cognizence, she has not been issued with the summons by the jurisdictional Court and hence, she could not appeared and consequently, a non-bailable warrant came to be issued. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that on an earlier occasion the petitioner moved an application for anticipatory bail in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.3253 of 2011 and the same was dismissed on 11.03.2011. 5.This Court taking into consideration of the above said facts and circumstances of the case, especially the fact that the charge sheet has already been filed, is of the opinion that the petitioner is to be enlarged on bail in the event of arrest subject to the following conditions that the petitioner is enlarged on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the Court of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tirunelveli, on 18.04.2011 and file an affidavit of undertaking to the Court of Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli that she will appear before the said Court on all future hearing dates without fail. On such conditions, the non-bailable warrant was issued by the Court of Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli is recalled, failure on the part of the petitioner to comply with the any one of the above said conditions, would result in automatic dismissal of this petition without further any reference from this Court. sd/- 06/04/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, TIRUNELVELI. 2. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, TIRUNELVELI. 3. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CCB, POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 5. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. J.GUNASHEELAN MUTHIAH Advocate SR.No.12763 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.4020 of 2011 Date :06/04/2011 RJ/7.4.11 2p/7c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/