IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No.: 9201 of 2008. Decided on: 26.11.2010. _____________________________________________ Sher Singh. … Petitioner. Versus The Accountant General and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Lokender Thakur, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondent No.2. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): The petitioner has retired. However, while calculating the pensionary/retiral benefits, the salary for the month of August, 2002 has not been counted. Since the respondents had already been directed to release and pay the salary to the petitioner for the month of August, 2002 in CWP(T) No.16601 of 2008 (O.A. No.2761 of 2002), the pensionary benefits of the petitioner shall be calculated by 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - taking into consideration the salary for the month of August, 2002. 2. Accordingly, in view of the observations made hereinabove, the petition stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. November 26, 2010. (sck).