IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.801 of 2009 MADAN PRASAD, SON OF LATE RAM LAKHAN PRASAD, PROPRIETOR MAHARAJA DRESSES, MAIN ROAD,MOHALLA-SARAI,PARGANA-BALLIA, SUB-REGISTRY,SUB-DIVISION AND DISTRICT BEGUSARAI. -PETITIONER Versus MD.ABBAS,SON OF LATE MD.IDRIS (RECEIVER- APPOINTED BY THE COURT), MOHALLA-SARAI, PARGANA-BALLIA,SUB-REGISTRY,SUB-DIVISION AND DISTRICT-BEGUSARAI. -OPP.PARTY _____ For the Petitioner : M/s Kaushal kumar & Mukesh Kumar For the Opp.Party : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Sinha 2 01.02.2010 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Civil Revision on the ground that the same may not be maintainable in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Shiv Shakti Coop. Housing Society, Nagpur V. Swaraj Developers and others, (2003) 6 Supreme Court Cases 659 and Surrya Dev Rai V. Ram Chander Rai and Others, (2003) 6 Supreme Court Cases 675. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner wants to seek any other remedy, if available, to 2 him under law. Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Sinha, appearing on behalf of opposite party, raises no objection. In that view of the matter, this Civil Revision is dismissed as withdrawn. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.) AAhmad