IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Rev.No.564 of 2003 Date of decision : 5.3.2009 Sham Lal … Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana and others …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr.Justice A.N.Jindal. Present :- Mr.N.K.Malhotra for the petitioner. Ms.Rajat Goyal, AAG, Haryana. A.N.Jindal, J. (Oral) The six persons faced trial under Sections 148, 323, 324, 325, 326 read with Section 149 IPC, out of which Mai Lal and Jit Lal were acquitted by the trial court whereas four respondents namely Kartar Singh, Hawa Singh, Jagdish and Ram Kumar were acquitted by the appellate court. The State did not file any appeal against the acquittal. However, complainant-Sham Lal has filed the revision petition. Arguments heard and perused the record. According to factual background, Sube Singh and Lachman suffered injuries at the hands of aforesaid accused. Sube Singh suffered five injuries and Lachman suffered four injuries. A grievous injury on the person of Sube Singh is attributed to Kartare. Grievous injury suffered by Lachman Singh is attributed to Ram Kumar. The evidence put forth by the prosecution is hardly sufficient to bring the respondents into net. The ocular version does not fit in with the medical evidence. At this revisional stage, the judgment could be interfered only if it suffered from procedural defects or was based on misreading of Crl.Rev.No.564 of 2003 evidence. Rather in the instant case, evidence appears to have been appreciated in the right perspective. Therefore, this revision petition being unmerited is dismissed. [ A.N.Jindal ] Judge 05.03.2009 sd 2