mngle Bench (D l 1 h é k J‘N THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.(S) No. {49D 3 12009 (3.3.) _/ :1. Padum Kumar Banjare, S/o Shri Shanker Lal vBanjare, aged E about 48 ‘ years OcCupation — U.D,T, M.D.V., Govt. High School Balaucla Bazar', Distt. Raipur (C.G.). ’ Ramjeevan Yadgv, S/o Shri Revaram Yadav, aged abouti 59 years, Occupation ~ U.D.T., : R/o M.D.V. Govt. High‘Schoolo Bajrang Chauk Balauda Bazar, Distt. Raipur (C.G.). VERSUS l/State of Chhattisgarh; Through - ‘ Secretary I Education Department, ‘ ETITIONER PS, H ,, ‘D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) ‘21/ Chief Executive Officer,:‘ Zila Panchayat, Raipur; Distt. Raipur (C.G.) / 3.‘ District Education Officer: Balodabazar Distt. Raipur J (C.G.) RIT PETITIONUNDER'ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA he petitioners, named above, mos‘t humbly and respectfully begs to submit as under:- , : W T i o 1(\[*P‘C$)N”u 5 ‘3 § oo mm m'm (W) \ man armm ‘ WW wm \ i % arm straw \ SB : HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRmNKERbIWAKER 12.8.2009 Shri Somkant Verma, cou l for tha petitioners. Ms. SunitaJain, RL. far State, At the outset, counsel for t e petitioners wants to withdraw the present petition with liberty to f representation before respondent No.2 raising all the grievances a ainst the impugned transfer order dated 6.08.2009. He however s bmits that the said authority be directed to decide the representati n so made expeditiously. Counsel for the State has o objection if the representation of the petitioners is decided by the uthority concerned in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petition dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. In the event aiity of filing representation by the petitioners within a period of ten ays from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the same is expec ed to be decided within a further period of three weeks from the dat of its receipt: Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge t n e i i