I ).-' 2 % 02.07.2009 Present : Mr. Vivek Singh and Mr. Manish Kaushik, Advocates for the appellant Mr. Rohit Nagpal, Advocate for respondent No. 2 + Co. A. (58) No. 22/2009 & CA No. 775/2009 The appellant is aggrieved of the interim order passed by the Company Law Board on 20th May, 2009 in CP No. 45 (ND)/2009 moved by the appellant under Section 397/398 of the Companies Act. The Company Law Board is seized of the matter and an interim order had been passed by the Company Law Board, which according to· the appellant does not adequately address his grievance. Both the counsel are agreed that they will be satisfied if the f·' Company Law Board is directed to hear and of the main matter expeditiously. Counsel for respondent No. 2 states that the reply to the petition, which had to be filed before the Company Law Board by 30th June, 2009, has still not been filed. He undertakes to file the reply before the Company Law Board within one week from today positively with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellan who may file rejoinder within one week thereafter. Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified • Under the circumstances, and looking to the nature of the pleadings filed by the parties, the learned Company Law Board is directed to dispose of the petition on merits within two months from today. The petition may be taken up by the Company Law Board on 17th July, 2009 for directions for this purpose. Parties may appear on · that date before the Company Law Board. The appeal and the interim application are disposed of . July 02, 2009 rs k \Jw s4A ____-- /'MISRA, J.