^ ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH I'Fi:, WRIT PETITION NO^o?-60F 2004 PETITIONER: iW ^ ...-*" l.-"/' ^'. ,&..--^' gp< ^ RESPONDENTS t"fr%^^ y^ A-' ^.lV 3-^ ^:"^?^. ^,-', c-5 v< < ??... ~:;1. /y ^: '^ Ram&iromaiii, S/o Ram Kishore Pandey, Aged about 40 years, Preseatly posted aad working as Cpnstable No.942 (Promoted as lead Constable), PolK-e^tation , Nelsh Nar, District Biialp^C.G.). Versus 1. Unionoflndia Through fhe Secretary, Department of Personnel, Public Grievance and Pension, Third Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, NewDelhi. 2. State ofMadhya Pradesh / Through the Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.). 3. State of Chhattisgarh . Through the Secretar>r, Department of Home Affairs, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4. DirectorGeneral ofPolice, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.). 5. Inspector General of Police (Personnel), Police Head Quarters, Raipur, District Raipur 6. SuperintendentofPolice, District Bijapiu- (C.G.). v^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/221OTLTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (^ *\ H!GH COURT OF CHHATT1SGARH AT BILASPUR SiNGLE BENCH : HON'BLE WIR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. WR!T PETmON NQ.502SOF 2QB4 Petitioner Ramsiromani versus Respondente : . Union of India and others Present : Mr. B.D.Guru, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. S.K.Beriwal, counsel for respondent No.1. Mr. Rajeev Shrivastava, counsel for respondent No.2. Mr. V.V.S.Moorthy, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panet Lawyer for the State of ChhatBsgarh/respondents No.3 to 6. ORDER ISt (Passed on 1" Day of February, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. The writ petiUon is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. Noorderastocosts. — - Sd/- satish K Agirifaotri Judge Gopai