IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42821 of 2010 1. MEHI KUWAR 2. JITENDRA KUWAR 3. SATPAL KUWAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----- 02. 05.04.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to add the name of petitioner no.1’s father in the prayer portion. Permission is accorded. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the state. Petitioner no.1 is shown order giver while petitioner no.2 is assailant of informant’s mother by means of lathi and petitioner no.3 to his father, by iron rod, but no injury appeared to believe caused with intention to kill. Theft is ornamental. Parties are agnates from common ancestor and have now resolved their differences. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Simri P.S. Case No.144 of 2010, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P. C. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)