THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos. 11023, 11031 & 14247 OF 2008 COMMON ORDER: The petitioners in these writ petitions have been engaged on daily rate basis, by the Girijan Cooperative Corporation Ltd. Subsequently, when their services were terminated, they approached this court, by filing the writ petitions, before this court. They were disposed of, directing that as and when the respondents take up the recruitment for the vacancies, on regular basis, the cases of the petitioners shall be considered, on preferential basis. The 1st respondent issued a notification dated 6.6.2007, proposing to fill 26 vacancies of Salesman. The process comprised of the written test and interview. The notification stated inter alia that the persons, who approached this court on an earlier occasion, can also apply. The petitioners and various other candidates have applied. The respondents selected and appointed initially 15 candidates. These writ petitions are filed, assailing the action of the respondents, in selecting fresh candidates and not selecting them. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. When the petitioners approached this court, complaining the action of the respondents, in discontinuing them from service, an observation was made to the effect that as and when regular appointments take place, the case of the petitioners shall be considered, on priority basis. It is difficult to accept the contention of the petitioners that the respondents ought not to have issued any notification and ought to have filled the vacancies with them. Further, the extent of priority conferred upon the petitioners, is only subject to their getting all the required marks in the written test, as well as interview. The petitioners are not able to point out any serious defect in selection of the 15 candidates. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents submits that the cases of the petitioners and other similar candidates are being considered, against the left over 11 vacancies, and orders of appointment would be issued to the eligible candidates. In that view of the matter, the writ petitions are disposed of, directing that the respondents shall consider the case of the petitioners for appointment, against the left over vacancies, and issue orders of appointment to such of them, who stand to selection. It is further directed that in case, any petitioner is not selected and appointed, the reason thereof shall be communicated to him, within two weeks, thereafter. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ 4th July 2008 PAN