1 sa621.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 621 OF 2010 Waman s/o Dajiba Rathod, Age: 38 years, Occ: Service (Mechanic), Dhanesh Auto Company Limited, M.I.D.C. Area, Waluj, Aurangabad. ...APPELLANT VERSUS Sangita w/o Waman Rathod, Age: 35 years, Occ: Household, R/o. Lohara (Kh.), Tal. Aundha Basmath, District Hingoli. ...RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13029 OF 2011 ... Mr. A.R. Borulkar, Advocate for appellant- applicant. Mr. M.V. Thorat, Advocate for respondent sole. ... CORAM: S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 14TH NOVEMBER, 2011 PER COURT : . Heard learned Counsel for the appellant. 2 sa621.10 2. This appeal is filed challenging the concurrent findings recorded by the Courts below thereby granting Rs.1000/- per month towards maintenance to the respondent-wife. Learned Counsel for the appellant would submit that, in spite of sincere efforts of the appellant-husband, respondent-wife is not ready to come to the matrimonial house and to cohabit with him. Therefore, no fault can be attributed to the appellant. It is further submitted that, respondent-wife is also getting some amount from Sanjay Gandhi Niradhar Yojna. Learned Counsel for the appellant invited my attention to the grounds taken in the appeal memo and submitted that, second appeal deserves to be allowed. 3. On the other hand, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent would rely on the findings recorded by the Courts below. 4. Upon hearing the Counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the findings recorded by the 3 sa621.10 Courts below and in particular para-13 of the judgment from the trial Court, I am of the considered view that, second appeal does not raise any substantial question of law for consideration. On appreciation of evidence, both the Courts found that respondent-wife is entitled for the maintenance of Rs.1000/- per month. 5. In that view of the matter, second appeal stands dismissed. Consequently, Civil Application stands rejected. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/NOV11