IN TI-E HIGH COURT OF JUDICA‘IURE AT BILASPUR (0.6-) w.P.No. lggg aF 2004// BEWEW Shiv shanke: Kushwaha s/o Late shri Bhagat singh Kushwaha, aged about 34 yeammccupation service as a peon, postad at Govt.Middle School Thakurdiya Tehsil Kharsiya District Raigarh (CG). 2. Mohan La]. Kanwar s/o Late Shri Bhoj Ram Kanwar,aged about 28 years. occupation service as peon at Govt Girls Middle school Kharsiya ,Tehsil Kharsiya Distt aaigarh (CG). 3. Tej Kumar séhu s/o Late shri Bhurwa Ram Sahu. aged about 30 yearS. occupation service. as peon. posted at I Govt.Hr.sec.school Kharsiya. District Rmaiark (CG); W v'“ I PETITIONEW AND ,5M‘3x". ””1’: The department state of of Chhattisgarh.through school Education. Mantralay, the secretary D.K. s. Building Raipur (CG). 2. The callectcr, Raigarh. District Raigarh (cc). Tm Deputy Director. Education. Raigarhc! The District Education 0££icer. Raigarh a RESPONDENTS §¢I€RIT PEI‘iTiON UNDER ARTICLES 226/227/0/g TEE CONSTXWTION OFVJ INDIA ,_.IV HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH’AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 1868 of 2004 PETITIONER Shiv Shanker Kushwaha & Others. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : The Siate of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF TI-E CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Sunil Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Govemment Advocate for the State/ Respondents. ORDER (ORAL . (Passed on 15 day of September, 2009) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that so far as prayer clause 7.1 is concerned, the relief has already been granted. In respect of prayer clause 7.2, it is with regard to difference ofarrears, which, according to learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to. Shri Sahu further submits that a representation for payment of arrears is still pending consideration. 2. Shri Bhatia, learned Deputy Government Advocate appearing for the State/respondents submits that if the representation of the petitioner is pending consideration, the same will be considered and decided in accordance with law, as early as possible. 3. In View of the above, the petition is disposed of. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner toiagitate the issue by tiling a fresh representation, or take appropriate steps under provisions ofilaw, if cause of action ~ ‘K thereafter survives, if so advised. l l . Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotli Judge om; rms t7 (zoo?) .