IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30481 of 2009 GUDDU SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 04.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. In an F.I.R. registered against unknown under Section 302/34 of the Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act with no eye-witness to the occurrence, the defence is of false implication based on alleged confession of co-accused only before the Police inadmissible in evidence. The impugned order only states that the petitioner had allegedly arranged the motorcycle for co-accused, which has been considered as ‘sufficient materials’ to reject the prayer for regular bail. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, abovenamed be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri K.K. Srivastava, A.D.J., F.T.C. IV, Buxar in Koran Sarai P.S. Case No. 03 of 2009. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)