In the Punjab and Haryana High Court, at Chandigarh. CRM-M- 24174 of 2009 Decided on Sept 06,2011 Pritam Singh --Petitioner vs. State of Punjab and another --Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.Karan Nehra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.A.S.Rai, DAG,Punjab Mr.G.S.Gill,Advocate,for the complainant Rakesh Kumar Jain,J:(Oral) The only point raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that while allowing bail application, the learned Court below had observed that “the learned Public Prosecutor could not impress upon the Court by what means and evidence, the provisions of Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code have been added when the specific provisions make such an offence to be bailable” It is submitted that the Court below should not have made observation on the merits of the case. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, it is ordered that any observations made by the learned Court below while deciding of the bail application will not have any bearing on the merits of the case. Disposed of. Sept 06,2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge