a J. 30w ® IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATI'ISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) RIT’PETITION No.3isa /2004 W ‘1 'i iv .. 1. Khemdas Sahu, aged about 45 years, son of Late Shri Durgaram Sahu, resident of village urla, Post Mohannagar, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) 2. Pandey, ‘1 'i Prahlad Prasad aged about 37 years, son of Shri Chintamani, resident of Dhamdha, distt. Durg ........ (Chhattisgarh) . RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through : the Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) The Registrar, Firms and Society, Office 'of the Registrar, Shankar Nagar, Raipur(CG) 'The District Collector, Durg, distt. Durg (C.G.) Department of Revenue, D.KS. Bhawan, 3 by @ Tribhuwan Sing‘h Verma, 74¢ aged about 41 years, son ofi’z I Shri Nakul Singh Verma, (k resident of — Budhvihar, Shankar Nagar, Durg (CG) f g @ Thakur Kamlesh Singh, son of Khan Smgh, aged about ~43 years, resident of Shyama- Prasad Mukharji Nagar, Sikola, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh);~ , h‘ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTIQLES 2261227 OF THE ONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN HE NAT RE OF CERTIORARI MANDAMUS E PPROPRIATE ORDER/ ORDERS DIRECTION / DIRECTIONS S 1 wwWw.\ C T TC EA S%/o Pl¢o 31 W$m$ W200 anéer tam (W3) GA. for the State. Shri Sandeep Dubey, $hri P. Diwakar, 8r. Cot for respondent No. 4 Trib'nu Kamiesh Singh. Heard. The pétitioners fiied fr respondenr No. 4 Tribhuwan a Singh are not office bearers an their transfer was cance‘ried canéeiiarion of their rransfer, tr the piece where they have bee 31-7-2004, the petitioners as and respondent no. 5 Thakur being transferred, the petitio < reiieved from their present pia on ’i ~9-‘2004 en‘order was pass order of respondent No, 4 Trii; Kamies‘n Singh and some otl office bearers, their transfer i submits that they are not the of Notices were issued in 27-7‘20G5, after hearing the vocate Generai for the Ste SP/FS/20x. nsei with S‘hri Bharat Rajput, counsei Nan and respondent no. 5 Thakur is petition on the ground that the ”rd respondent no. 5 Thakur Kamiesh d yet on making faise representation, on ’i-Q~2004 and because of the re petitioners were not abie to join at 1 transferred. petitioner sdbmitted that initiaiiy on Learned counsei for the Neii as respondent No. 4 Tribhuwan Kamiesh $ingh were transferred. On ters handed over the charge and oe of posting. Counsei submits that ed by the State canceling the transfer huwan and respondent no. 5 Thakur rers mentioning that since they are s canceiied. Co'unsei for petitioners fice bearers. this petition and repiy wasifed. On a counsei for the petitioners, Dy. te and Shri Bharat Rajput, counsef '& f W mmafsaanéar m;%#a§§w 14-12-2065 Shri T.ir<. Tiwari, Couns ei for petitioners Khemdas $ahu and Prahiad Prasad Pandey. XI.Hc.22 ~p (MoSSE/nér 11mm . .............. _.......... V......“a1 200 mmww - WW Wm $Wm appearing for respondent-Na. 4 Iribhuwan and respondent no. 5' I naKur Kamiesh Singh, the foiiowin; order was passed:- \ “Learned-counsei for {he peritioner submr‘is rhaf by an'orde'r dared 31-93742004 (AnneXwa vP-zf), .fhe peti r No :1 has been transferred ffdm PaiWarri Haika No '13 Durg fo Paiwari HalkaNQ 18; Durg and getitianer No, zinamEI Rrahlad rauuby n_——J--. nab L9- Liven I.--‘ A--.‘ uanSrei'i'e) .r J: li'CviTI ra n L Uhamaha to Faiwa'ri Harrie Number—1'5. Burg. He aiso submits .fhat' the respnnr’mrf ”n35 & 5 nameiy' Iribhuwan' Verma and Thakur’ Kamiexh Singh were fransferrea' from PanA/ari Halka Ngmbén €18,0urg fa Patwari Halka Number-.7, Drlii‘g’auu ‘J 'H‘£..-...‘ ram/an mama l I ll, ’ Ar: 1v vuLLi.' mucl-iu, A: uulg H....' TO Parr/V Haika’ Namber—é‘, Dhamd'ha: but, zhey gof fhe'ir order canceifed by fhe State Gav! an a repres being made 6'7 accountpf ' being’ five (Jr’fic'e bearer of Chnaiiisgarh Paiwari' Sangg. He glee draw my aftentign 9n paragragh—é Qf reiurh filed by the 'ozme 9i-‘ if? 'vvmurl u Haa‘ uEér‘? eiawe mar we; arurwemu inrormafion in reiarion forebpondenf Na. 5 being r‘he’efecr‘ee’ ofiice bearer of, any such cangh was mconrect, mi‘eleedin and faise So'me' ofher exp: nairons have beengiverr in fhis paragranh reamed Com- fer the pefirioner submits abet in uyur w me mate-mam maue i7 [‘JaFaFueOI t A'I‘L- me relu’i’i? i-.§. ai‘ru .l awO ‘Y- if? fhe iight of the fransfer 0rd of rhe peffr‘ioners which has nor- s ma be di‘ jein a? the .K y rehferi in respective iransferred piec Ar this junc?ure, iéarr7ed c unseiir‘or rhe Sfar‘e sebmifs z‘he peering cf the resmndent !\ o. 5 & 6 in the respective-pieces where the ’pefifioners have been iransferrea', has nor heen cancelled and :he pefiiien came? jam a? their reseective cueu -....-.1 waves: _1-_-- m LL. .u. mat . 'uuauun, 1.. .L:-_ J.’:wu ................ ,ucro Haj vvvuru 1.1 be posted on one piece again f one post. Learned counsei fore the State seeks 11.410 week’s time to do the needfu! so met fhe transferred pieces of fhe ifjoners maybe vacanf for‘fheir ommg: As prayed, time is grantd. e ..L.‘.-L .1 I. - i. LI. .L- . .H. & 4L.- ' -I.‘V-":_J‘ s I l.'_.1..r. -_‘ .‘l. -A-J‘."-_.‘ u .l v-.,-..} :J j. owwnw V w r. Ive y w 6 ' é . n e , e S .. [ : a “ p t J WW:W@W W w 10 N2: 3i§?/"¢( mm . .....................................‘g—vt 1007 A orer wa passed since the State counse Exprese difficuitiesihat the petitioners can‘ jdin at their respec‘rive piac’es and postmg of reapondenis hasnot been c'anceiied and two persons wouid be posted on one piece aga nst one poet. The State counsei tooK mm weeks time i0 do the nee fui so that the transferred pieces or {he petitioners may be avaiiab for their joining. 6n 31~f5-'2005, ’ the Dy. Coiiector issued a tranefe order of petitioners by posting them in pieces ‘0? respondents.,Th matter came upefor hearing on ' 1—9-2005 and an applications i -No.3‘s//;2U0b for grant of ctayimtenm renet was med by t respondents regarding stay of order datea 51 ozOuo wnirn was duiy supported on awoawt’ iripnuwan bingn Verma. When tne matter came up tor nearang on a~ $2005, it was informed that the etiti‘oners attempted to join the i ornce, but respondents Tribhuw n and Thakur Kamiesh Singh iocked the office and did not‘aiow the petitioners to join The .T95p0“dents n0 'i anU £ were dfeCIEd t0 maKe ai‘i Ei'muii'y ahd submit report Ute btaie through Dy boieCIOF has SUSmmed repOft afid found that the responaents 4 and denperateiy iocKea their ornces to avoio hand over ot tne Charge to‘tne petitioners and run away the report tired rs on pehait of the state and no counter has been tried /-\ perusal ot the rep rt submitted supported by tne' afridaVit of the Uy boriector snows that respondent no e iriohwrah Himlh Verma and reSDOndei’it o. o rhaKur Kamiesh bingh eiioerateiy'iooxeo the office and avoidednand' ovterfth'e charge; ‘mea‘ ea ims d s i sd n t i . . n t d x XI—HC~22 lne” aUHUH5 db ralecieu H) LHB H é’ctionjn acco’rdance with iawdbet $tatus quo granted on 5-8- ”be aiioWed to jo‘in. The orders be ( ‘ The petitionis‘accordingiy‘ Consequen'tiy LA. No. 748 atand disposed at. ‘ A'copy of this order be ai ’421Qf2005 anci WP. N0. 4226/20 vpmWE exammeu unu appiupnm . aken by the $tate. ‘ £UU5 is vacaéed and the'petitione'r :ompiied with. iisposed of. ii20‘5 ahd {'V‘HNIP. No. 337712005 o kepi in the record of WP. No.1 ’ I5. _ i \V/J\ \ sdl- \ i Fakhwddm i i Judge i /\ a . s i