BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Third day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.PALANIVELU CRL OP(MD) No.10984 of 2011 1 BALU NAIDU 2 NAVANEETHAMMAL ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 AND 2 Vs STATE REP BY:: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KODAIKANAL POLICE STATION, KODAIKANAL, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, CRIME NO.502/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. V.PERUMAL Advocate For Respondent : MR. A. RAMAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 420,465,467 and 468 I.P.C. in Crime No.502 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioners were charged under Sections 420,465, 467 and 468 I.P.C. He further submitted that the de-facto complainants have lodged a complaint against the petitioners on the allegation that the petitioners have cheated the de-facto complainants and taken away their property. He further submits that the de-facto complainant had executed a sale deed in the year 2000 and the same was registered on 02.03.2000 and the property was sold by Alaguthurai for the proper sale consideration and they have allowed the petitioners to enjoy the property. He further submits that the petitioners have not committed any offence and they are innocent persons and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the investigation is going on and hence he prays for dismissal of this application. 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and even though the petitioners were not arrested they neither interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate Kodiakanal, and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Kodaikanal, and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. sd/- 23/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KODAIKANAL, DINDIGUL DIST 2 DO THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL 3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KODAIKANAL POLICE STATION, KODAIKANAL, DINDIGUL DISTRICT 1. CC to M/S. V.PERUMAL Advocate SR.No.28712: DM::2011:AUGUST:25:: ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10984 of 2011 Date :23/08/2011 2P:6C:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/