C.R. No. 1848 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 1848 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 7.4.2010 ... Sadhu Singh ................Petitioner vs. Sukhjinder Kaur and another .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. Tribhawan Singla, Advocate for the petitioner ... K.C. Puri, J. (Oral) This is a revision petition against the order dated 27.2.2010 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Nakodar, vide which the objection petition under Section 47 CPC was dismissed. The petitioner was defendant in the suit for specific performance preferred by Sukhjinder Kaur and Amarjit Kaur. That Civil suit No. 444 of 2001 which was instituted on 27.2.2001 was decided on 9.6.2006 and decree for specific performance was ordered. It was ordered that plaintiffs shall deposit the balance sale consideration of Rs.87,500/- within a period of one month from the date of passing the decree and thereafter defendant shall execute the sale deed, failing which the plaintiffs shall have got the right to get C.R. No. 1848 of 2010 -2- the sale deed executed with the intervention of the Court. The amount of Rs.87,500/- was to be deposited and the time for depositing the amount was enlarged for two days by the Executing Court. That order has been challenged by filing the present petition. From the perusal of the decree, it is revealed that it was not a conditional decree. So, in these circumstances, the Executing Court was well within its right to extend the period. So, in these circumstances, no ground for interference is made out. Consequently, the revision petition is without any merit and the same stands dismissed. ( K.C. Puri ) 7.4.2010 Judge chugh