IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11101 of 2009 CHANDRA MOHAN PATHAK, CHANDRA MOHAN PATHAK SON OF SRI SAKALDEO PATHAK, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SAMAR, P.O. MOHISAUTHA, P.S. NANPUR, DISTRICT SITAMARHI---PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE LALIT NARAYAN MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, LALIT NARAYAN MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA. 3. THE REGISTRAR, LALIT NARAYAN MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA. 4. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, LALIT NARAYAN MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA. 5. THE PRINCIPAL, C.M. COLLEGE, DARBHANGA, DISTRICT DARBHANGA—RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02. 31.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner appeared in the Bachelor of Arts Economics(Hons.) Examination, 1994 held in the month of August, 1995. His result for the said examination has been published along with other students but petitioner was not given the marks of one of the pass course paper, namely, Philosophy. For grant of marks of philosophy paper petitioner approached this Court by filing C.W.J.C. No. 10820 of 2007 i.e. after more than 22 years, yet the writ petition was entertained and disposed of under orders dated 19.8.2008, Annexure-4 directing the University to consider the request of the petitioner and to provide him the marks of philosophy paper. The Examination Board has considered the request of the petitioner in the light of the orders of this Court dated 19.8.2008 and have rejected the prayer on the ground that petitioner did not appear in the pass course paper of philosophy after the examination was cancelled. The order of the Examination Board has been communicated to the petitioner under order dated 5.1.2009 issued under the signature of the Examination Controller, which is contained in Annexure-5. Against order Annexure-5 petitioner has a remedy before the Vice Chancellor of the - 2 - University. Accordingly, petitioner is directed to approach the Vice Chancellor of Lalit Narayan Mithili University, Darbhanga with his request to provide him marks of philosophy paper, which should be considered in accordance with law. If petitioner still remained aggrieved by the order of the Vice Chancellor then he should approach the Chancellor of the Universities and request of the petitioner should be considered by the authorities within a reasonable time. 3. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)