IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1287 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 1287 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 1287 OF 2006 1. Gopal Ramdas Adsul & 8 ors. ] ..Petitioners Vs. 1. The Asstt. Municipal Commissioner, ] M.C.G.M. & 3 ors. ] ..Respondents Mr. R.R. Mishra for the petitioners. Mrs. S. Ajit Kumar for the respondent No.1. Mr. G.D. Uttangale for respondent No.2. Mr. A.M. Kulkarni for respondents No.3 and 4. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : 03RD MAY, 2006 P.C. . It is a case of the petitioners that they are eligible in the SRA Scheme in respect of which LOI has been issued in favour of respondent No.3. The applications are pending before the respondent No.1 and have yet to be decided. On behalf of respondent No.3, learned counsel orally submits that the petitioners were residing with their relatives who have been held to be eligible. We are not called upon to decide the said controversy. As the petitioners’ applications are pending before respondent No.1, respondent No.1 to : 2 : consider the same and dispose of the applications within 12 weeks from today, after hearing respondent No.3. With the above directions, Writ Petition disposed of. 2. We make it clear that we are not granting any interim relief staying the Project. Sd/- [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] Sd/- [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]