IN THE HIGH COUR T OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37031 of 2008 Umesh Prasad Rai Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr ----------- 2 15.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This application has been filed challenging the order including discharge the petitioner for offences under 100 of the Cr. P.C and 39 of the Arms Act. The points raised on behalf of the petitioner is that the seizure list was not prepared in accordance with Code of Criminal Procedure. The case was lodged beyond the jurisdiction of the Court where the occurrence has taken place have both the answered by the order impugned. It has also been clarified by the Court below that permission has been obtained and raid was conducted with the help of Police Officer of Sighaul Police Station and as such the case has been correctly instituted as Sighaul P.S. Case No. 11 of 2005. Having perused the order impugned and the reasoning given by the Court below, this Court finds no illegality in the impugned order. This application is thus disposed of. Prakash (Sheema Ali Khan, J)