IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.11659 of 2010 Date of Decision: December 06, 2010 Inder Pal & Others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab and others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. B.P.S. Virk, Advocate, for the petitioners. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari, quashing selection of respondent Nos.7 to 95. The petition further prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the official respondents to retain the petitioners on the post they are presently working. 2. In the writ petition, the petitioners rely on Annexure P-2 to P-13 to say that they have experience of serving the official CWP No.11659 of 2010 [2] respondents as Sweepers. 3. Letters of appointment have been placed on record by way of Civil Miscellaneous No.15394 of 2010 which indicate that the petitioners are employees of a private establishment. 4. So far as allegations are concerned, perusal of Para 3 to 5 of the petition does not indicate any specific ground having been taken in regard to the alleged illegal action of the respondents. The petition has been filed without any proper foundation and particulars. 5. Faced with such situation, learned counsel wants to withdraw the petition so as to file a better petition with complete particulars. 6. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (AJAI LAMBA) December 06, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?