: 1 : wp-866-11=.sxw USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 866 OF 2011 Bhagwantrao Pandurang Khupte ..Petitioner v/s. B.E.S.T. & undertaking & Anr. .. Respondents ......... Mr. Limaye Sadashiv Sharu for the petitioner Mr. S.K. Talsania, Sr. Advocate a/w Dipankar Das, Shridhar Chari i/b M.V. Kini & Co. for respondents ......... CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR & R.Y.GANOO, JJ. DATE : 25th JULY, 2011. P.C. : 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. Even if the grievance of the petitioner that the Authorities hastened the process of accepting the V.R.S. application submitted by the petitioner on 3rd February, 2010 and accepted the same on the same day were to be accepted, the fact remains that the petitioner acted upon his request of taking V.R.S., which is reinforced from withdrawal of the amounts due and payable to him, on that basis, between 30th April, 2010 till 29th June, 2010. Once, the petitioner has withdrawn all the amounts due and payable to him, after acceptance of his V.R.S. by the authority, it is too late : 2 : wp-866-11=.sxw to complain about the inaction on the part of the authorities to decide the request made by him vide letter dated 25th February, 2010 to allow him to withdraw the V.R.S. proposal submitted by him. Moreover, once the authorities have accepted the V.R.S., the question of petitioner being permitted to submit an application for withdrawal from the VRS scheme, would not arise. 2. Taking any view of the matter, therefore, the petition is devoid of merits. Petition disposed of accordingly. (R.Y.GANOO, J.) (A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.)