IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.19158 of 2010 MAHENDRA YADAV . Versus SHREE NARAYAN & ORS . ----------- 2. 21.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and for respondent nos. 1 and 2. The Title Suit is of the year 1982. The trial Court has rightly opined that the amendment application filed 26 years later was highly belated. Alternatively it has also been observed that earlier a similar amendment application was allowed which was not upheld by this Court in Civil Revision No. 697 of 2004. The impugned order also sufficiently notices that the repeat amendment petition was “almost the same except some grounds”. It appears from the impugned order that the trial has progressed sufficiently by leading of evidence by the plaintiff on basis of the written statement. In the entirety, the Court finds no reason to interfere with the impugned order. That the suit is of the year 1982 is considered sufficient ground to give a direction to conduct the suit on a day to day basis and conclude the same within a maximum period of one year from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. 2 Any adjournment to either party shall be only for sufficient and cogent reasons to be recorded in the order sheet. The writ application stands dismissed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)