IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.11601 of 1990 Date of Decision.19.08.2011 Dharam Pal son of Shri Piare Lal, Teacher, Government High School, Grangal, District Ropar .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab through the Secretary, Education Department, Punjab Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh and another .....Respondents Present: Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Arvind Mittal, Addl. A.G., Punjab. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The case has been directed to be posted by a Bench of this Court on 30.08.1990 after the decision of the case in C.W.P. No.10457 of 1989. The registry has pointed out that C.W.P. No.10457 of 1989 has already been decided in regular hearing on 05.10.1990. 2. I perused the judgment in the above-mentioned case and this Court has dismissed it by saying that there is no merit in the claim of the petitioner that he could not have been superannuated at the age of 58 years and that he belonged to a service that would provide for age of superannuation at 60 years. 3. Petitioner's claim is similarly placed. This writ petition is also dismissed. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 19, 2011 Pankaj*