: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.315 OF 2005 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1829 OF 2004 IN SUIT (LODGING) NO.2965 OF 2004 R.Ramkrishnan & Ors. ....Appellants Ori.Plff. V/s. M/s.Rapid Developers & Ors. ....Respondents Ori.Defts. And Taxing Master & Ors. ....Respondents Ori.Respdts Mr.D.S. Chaudhari for the Appellants. Mr.Milind More, AGP for Respondent No.3. CORAM : A.P. SHAH AND S.J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATED : 5TH APRIL, 2005. P.C. : . Heard advocates. Perused the order of the Taxing Master as well as the order of the learned single Judge. On a perusal of the plaint it is seen that the reliefs claimed in the suit are not only for a decree of specific performance and possession but a prayer is also sought for payment of Rs.85,45,564/-. Considering the prayers, the court fee is rightly assessed by the Taxing Master in accordance with the : 2 : Bombay Court Fees Act. Appeal is dismissed. 2. We clarify that this order shall not preclude the Appellant from applying for deletion of any of the prayers and for revision of the court fees.