IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. (c1 No. éiWmzoos Petitioner /Smt. Sukhveer, aged about 46 years, Wife of Shn' J.S. /17\;m Virdhy'L)‘ resident of Lal Tanki, Rajgarh, C.G. Versus wxé’ Respondents 1. Municipal Corporation, Raigarh through Commissioner, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) its The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 226 [227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION, CERTERIORAI ETC OR ANY OTHER DIRECTIONS OR ORDER " XI-HC-ZZ Gowri 14-1 1 -2006 Shri Amit Sharma, counsel f None for respondent No.1. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt. A v. for the State/respondent No.2. Heard. v Learned counsel for the etitioner contended that Municipai Corporation, Raigarh (henceforth “t e Corporation”), has demolished the structure of the petitioner on the c unt that petitioner’s construction was unauthorized. He further conte ded that the Corporation while demolishing the unauthorized cons ruction is side by side aliotting shops to ‘those encroachers and on the, ty petitioner also prays for allotment of shops, but the Corporation did n 't allot any shop to her, therefore, on parity for grant of shop she has tiled he instantwrit petition. From the record, it is evide t'that petitioner did not apply before the Corporation for allotment of s op'as prayed for and has directly come before this Court. Even ot erwise, the dispute raised by the petitioner is a civil dispute cog izable by Civil Courts, therefore, petitioner if chooses may tile propriate application before the Corporation for allotment of shop a d also if chooses may institute civil suit for her reliefs before the compet nt Court of civil jurisdiction. ln view of the above, the writ etition is dismissed in Iimine. Consequently, M.(W.).P.No.4 18/2006 s ’ d. . Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava i Judge (rats W) i p‘ . p