THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY C.M.A.No.2184 of 2003 JUDGMENT: This civil miscellaneous appeal is filed by the petitioner- claimant against the judgment and decree of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Warangal in O.P.No.1047 of 2000 dated 18.02.2003. 2. Heard. 3. The case of the petitioner in brief is as follows: The claimant is the appellant. He claimed compensation of Rs.1.00 lakh contending that on 20.05.1996 while travelling in Zeep bearing No.AP 1T 8631, he received injuries on account of the accident caused by the zeep as the zeep turned turtle. The insurance company filed counter denying the petition allegations. 4. On the basis of the above pleadings, the following issues were framed: 1. Whether the accident is due to rash and negligent driving of the driver of the vehicle? 2. Whether the petitioner sustained any injuries and disability and is entitled to claim compensation, if so to what amount and from whom? 3. To what relief? 5. On behalf of the petitioner, P.W.1 was examined and Exs.A1 to A4 were marked. On behalf of the respondents, no oral evidence was adduced, however, Ex.B1 copy of policy was marked. On the basis of the material on record, the court below granted compensation of Rs.5,000/- holding that there is no material to show the injury suffered by the petitioner. Aggrieved by the same, the present appeal is filed. 6. The contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is that the petitioner suffered grievous injury on shoulder. Inspite of that the court below has erroneously granted a paltry amount of Rs.5,000/-. But as observed by the court below, there is absolutely no material to show the nature of the injury suffered by the petitioner. Ex.A2 is only zerox copy of injury certificate. It does not show clearly as to the nature of injuries suffered by the petitioner. Some illegible portion is found showing that some grievous injury was there and as observed by the court below, it is not clearly proved. However, considering all the circumstances, the compensation is enhanced to Rs.10,000/- from Rs.5,000/-. 7. The C.M.A. is accordingly partly allowed enhancing the compensation from Rs.5,000/- to Rs.10,000/-. No costs. ___________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. Date: 23.11.2010 Rns