3 SingieBencft ^-•- [r \ ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OP .IliJDICAIUBE OF CHHAmSCrAJRH AT BIIASPUB VRIT PETITIW N0. 3^3 /2005 lltia PETITIONER: ^ /^ \%f^ ^4^y ^M^X ^^y y-:.^' ^y/ ^•/ RESPONDENTS / Satyawati Yadu •..Aged about 34 years \W/0- late Jawahar lal Yadu R/0- Jora Post- Krishak nagar P.S.- Clvil Line Tah.& Distt- Raipur (C. G.) VERSUS 1) State of Chhattisgarh Through:- The Secretary Ministry of Agricultural and Environment Department D. K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C. G.) -2) Director, Agricultural and Environment Offlcer Raipur (C.G.) WRIT.PETITIW _UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OP THE CONSTITOTION OF ^^MA HIGH COURT OF OHHATriSGARH AT^BILASPUR Writ PetitiiQTi No. 303 of 2005 Pfetitioner: Satvawati Yadii Versus Respondents: State of Chhattisgarh and auother ...disaSa ^;^;^.^ ?;^-lrJ-' ' ;^ Sta^e Bench; HonTite Mr. Justice Satisfc K. Agnihotari. Shri Gaiib Dwivedi, Advocate fcr the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahiya, Dcpiity G«^vt. Advocate for the Respondents. v O R D ER ( 8th September, 2006) The foUowiag order oftfae Coiirt is passed by Satteh K. Agnlhotri, J. 1. The hiisbanrl of the petitioner CTarocly Shri Jawahar lal Yadu, while -working as Pfcon in tlic Agricultural and Rnvironinent neparbnent and was posted at Raipur, died in hamess on 12.7.1998. The pctitioner, hcing wife i.e. dependent and tegal heir, made an applicatron for compassioTiate appoJntment on 11.4.2005 (Aniicyi)rR P/2) which was not considercd on account of the fact that the (leath occiirrRrl beforR crRation of the new State ofChhattisgarh. 2. Recently the State GovemmeTit has issued circillar dated 2.2.2006 to consider the cases of" dependent lcgal heirs of deccased, employees on compassioTiatc basis wherR the deceased employee dicrt durmg the period ftnm 1.1J.T997 to 31.10.2000. This Coiirt has also passed order datcrl 20.12.2005 in W. P. No. 1322/ 2002 and other connected matters, ITI regairi to the inatte.rs relating to coropassionate appointinents. 's 3. In view of t1i<" above, the Stete Goveminent is directed to consider the case of the pctitioner as per its own cin'ular dated 2.2.2006 and also m view ofthe nriCT dated 20.12.2005, passed by this C-oDrt in W. P. No. 1322/2002 and other connected Tnattei^ OT) its cwm merit, in accordaTicR with law. 4. For fhe reasons stated-above, the writ petryon staTids disposed of. No orriler as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur