IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C. R. No. 4721 of 2009 Date of Decision: September 22, 2010 Dr. Satya Nand. …Petitioner Versus Parveen Kumar Talwar and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. V.K. Sandhir, Advocate, for the petitioner. None for the respondents. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that vendee from the plaintiff during the pendency of the case shall be vendee pendente-lite and transfer made during the pendency of the case shall be hit by principle of lis pendens. Learned counsel further states that even in the absence of the vendee pendente-lite, a decree can be passed and vendee pendente-lite shall be bound by that decree in view of Order C.R. No. 4721 of 2009 22 Rule 10 C.P.C. In view of this, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to raise all these points before the learned Trial Court at the time of final hearing of the suit. Dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty aforementioned. September 22, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2