IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4357 of 2011 INDU KUMARI, W/O RAJNATH THAKUR, R/O VILLAGE- KALYANPUR HARAUNA, BLOCK AND P.S.-MOTIPUR, DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR. ………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MUZAFFARPUR, AT AND P.O.-MUZAFFARPUR. 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, MUZAFFARPUR, AT AND P.O.MUZAFFARPUR. 4. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, AT AND P.O. AND P.S.-MOTIPUR, DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR. 5. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ MAHMADPUR BALMI, BLOCK AND P.S.-MOTIPUR, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR. 6. PANCHAYAT SEWAK-CUM-PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ MAHMADPUR BALMI, BLOCK AND P.S.-MOTIPUR, DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR. ………OPPOSITE PARTIES. ---------------------------------- 2 08.12.2011 This modification application has been filed for correction in the name of husband of the petitioner in the cause title of order dated 06.07.2011 passed in CWJC No.4248 of 2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to typing mistake in the entire writ petition the name of husband of the petitioner was typed as ‘Ram Janam Thakur’ instead of ‘Rajnath Thakur’. He submits that correct name of husband of the petitioner is ‘Rajnath Thakur’. Since, this Court had disposed of the writ application with a direction 2 to the parties to approach the Appellate Authority, it will be open to the Appellate Authority to verify the name of husband of the petitioner and, if it finds that, in fact, the name of husband of the petitioner is ‘Rajnath Thakur’, the Appellate Authority shall proceed accordingly ignoring the wrong name of her husband mentioned in the cause title of the order. As prayed for, two weeks more time is allowed to the petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority from today. Arvind/ ( J.N. Singh, J.)