IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.8234 of 2010 SUDARSHAN MANJHI son of Raghu Manjhi Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 10.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was refused bail by order dated 28.10.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No.20031 of 2009 that the application was being rejected for the present. Considering that now the petitioner has remained in custody since 24.3.2009, and is not named in the First Information Report and subsequently, his name transpired after 3-1/2 months, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj, in connection with Thawe P.S. case no.107 of 2008, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. Another bailor will be the father of the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, ,(ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and - 2 - be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (iv)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)