1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. APPLICATION NO. 3747 OF 2004 CRI. APPLICATION NO. 3747 OF 2004 CRI. APPLICATION NO. 3747 OF 2004 IN S.C.No.375/2004 In Cr.No.10/02 Talakchand Liladhar Dedhia ..Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. ----- Shri A.K. Singh for Applicant. Shri D.R. More, APP for Respondent. ----- CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 06.10.2004 DATED : 06.10.2004 DATED : 06.10.2004 PC :- PC :- PC :- . Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Perused the record. . The learned APP fairly accepts that the co-accused have been granted bail by the trial court for the reasons recorded in order dated 3rd July, 2004. On parity, the Applicant also deserves to be enlarged on bail because the role of the present Applicant is similar to that of co-accused. Hence, following order :- Applicant is enlarged on bail in connection 2 with C.R.No.10/2002, registered with Mulund Police Station, on executing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount. Applicant shall report to the investigating officer once in fortnight on Saturday between 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. The Applicant shall not influence the prosecution witness or tamper with the prosecution evidence in any manner whatsoever. The Applicant shall extend full co-operation for early disposal of the trial. If the trial court is of the opinion that the applicant is responsible for delay in the conclusion of the trial, that can be a ground for cancellation of his bail. . Order accordingly. .....