IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.469 of 2006 Krishnanandan Ray Son of Late Tooka Rai, resident of Mohalla- Kankarbagh, Lane no.2, P.S. Patrakar Nagar, District- Patna …….Appellant/Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Secretary, Higher Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. Deputy Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Vice-Chancellor, Patna University. 4. Registrar, Patna University, Patna. 5. Deputy Registrar, Patna University, Patna. 6. Assistant Registrar, Patna University, Patna. 7. Head of the Department, Department of History, Patna University, Patna. 8. Budget and Account Officer, Patna University, Patna. ………Respondents/Respondents ---------- 11/ 09.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the Patna University. The writ petition preferred by the appellant was dismissed by the order under appeal after considering the relevant facts and on coming to a finding that in view of the statement made in the counter affidavit the pay scale of the petitioner has not been reduced, rather, it has been fixed in the appropriate scale as per the rules. Even on going through the annexures to the writ petition, we find that there are missing links and the stand of the respondents appears to be correct that the petitioner had been allowed by somebody higher pay scale than what he was entitled to under law. In such circumstances, the action of the respondents requires no interference. We find no merit in this appeal, which is, accordingly, dismissed. JA/- (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)