HI6HCOURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT SSLASPUSt MVISIONBENCH CORAM: HON'BLESHRIJA®>ISHBHALLA,^.C.J. A HON'BLE SHRI T.P. SHARMA. J. Writ Appeal No.SW of 2007 ^ ABpeltont Petitioner fteaaondents Versus 1. Y Madan Lal Sahu, Aged about 50 yews, S/o Shfi Suklal, R/o Vlllage Kopedih, Tahsil <S Distt. n (C.S.). 2. 3. 4. Sfote of Chhdtti^arh Throigh i Seewttry, Department of Commerce d Inditfhy, Mantraloyo, O.K.S. Bhuvan, P.01 A Otett. Raipur (C.ff.). Collector, Rdijnandgoon (C.®.). Sub-Divfsiond Offieer, Rtynfflidgoon y.Q.}. Chhattisgctf+i State Industrial Etevebpment Corpwation Ltd., {An Undert'al<in9 of the SWe of Chhattjsgflrii), LIC Conunepciatj Complex ^round floor ond 2nd floor). Pandri,P.O. <S bistt. Raipir (C.&.). Writ Aopeal Under Section 2 of the Chhattisadrh Hiqh Court fADpeai to btvisioh BenchVAct. 2006, 1 : - '. " • Present: ShriB.ft.@hosh,counselfoftheoppelt<nit. Shri Vinay Ho»'it,Deputy Acivocare ©eneraiwnh Shri . yashwantSingh, &?vemment Advocate for theState. ' ORAL JUbSMENT (Passad on 15th Jflnuary, 20G® The following orat judgemnt of -rtie Court was poissed by I. • .'' : ^ • Hon'ble JegdishBhalta, Ag.C.J. . - After arguing the matter atsome tength, leamed ceunsel for /the appellant submitted 1+iat he would like to opproach the learneKt !M !\ -^. ^- subbu Single Judge by f!lin9 the review petition. particutarly in the back9round of a decision in W.P. (C) No. 7623/20Q7( Narsingh and- 0-Hier-s v. State of C.©.and others). According te leamed counset for the appelldnt, theonty difficul-ty being faced by him Is that the timitation is of 30 days and ndw the review petition would be be^nnd time of limitation. Interestof Justice would suffice that in caselfae oppellant fites a reviewpetitionby^-21.01.2008, theh the same shaW npt be rejected on the ground of ctsjay in filing •riie review petition. Wi'th thisobservatioh, the appeal stands dlsposed of. Certifiedcopyofltiis order within 24 houps, if possible., Sd/- ActingChiefJustice i^S ' ''2..-; i i'?. -. .;^. i Sd/- ; TRSharma i Judge ,'