WP(C) 3456/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE I.A. ANSARI Heard Mr. N.N. Upadhyaya, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Choudhur y, learned counsel for the respondents. While serving as a Grade-IV employee in the Assam Gas Company Limited, the petit ioner has been placed under suspension by order, dated 23.12.2009. Aggrieved by his suspension and also with a view to restraining the respondents from drawing any disciplinary proceeding, the petitioner has filed this writ petition to get the suspension order quashed. Appearing on behalf of respondents, Mr. B. Choudhury, learned counsel, submits t hat a fact finding enquiry was held by the respondents and it has, now, been dec ided to draw a disciplinary proceeding against the petitioner, but the same woul d need four months’ time to be concluded in accordance with law. Mr. N.N. Upadhyaya, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the nature of allegation, made against the petitioner, does not warrant a period of four mo nths for conclusion of disciplinary proceeding if drawn against the petitioner. Considering the matter in its entirety and in the interest of justice, this Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty given to the respondents to initiate disci plinary proceeding against the petitioner and dispose of the same in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of t his order by the respondent No. 1 namely, Assam Gas Company Limited. Mr. N.N. Up adhyaya submits that the petitioner would co-operate with the respondent company in getting disciplinary proceeding, if any, completed.