m THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR rCHHATTISGARHV MISC. CIVIL CASE N0.^f OF 2005 APPLICANT .y y^ ^ Raipur Development Authority, The body incorporated unaer Chhattisgarh NagarTatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam,1973, Having Its OfFice Near Bajarang Mandir, G. E. Road, Raipur Through its Chief Executive Officer, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) .o- ^^' ./' ^7 ^ NON-APPLICANTS VERSUS 1. Smt. Harbhajan Kaur, W/o Shri ^ Harbhajan Singh, aged about 47 years, R/o Govind Nagar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. State of Chhattisgarh through ''' The Secretary, Environment & Urban Development Department Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3. The Municipal Corporation Raipur, a body incorporated, Under Sec.-7 of CG Munidpal Corporation Act, 1956, having Its office at Malviya Road, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Vs^' ,^1 APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR COMPLETING THE PROCEEDINGS IN COMPLIANCE OF ORDER DATED ^15-02-2005 PASSED BY THE HON'BLD COURT IN i W.P.NO.tS44/2002 XI-HC-78 3:n^T^Tf^Tf^ cTSTT3R7^T$h^|cb 3^ET ^l^K-iq, ^Tft<-ljl(o, fs<cni<iy €) *11+1(<11 StiNTchJ!/I(Q.^L •)>••••>-'•" .QS: ^200 3TT^iq^7 (^f^^T) i^<TTW ^t?cf ^T^T 31-8-2006 Shri Manindra Shri^ Adv. for the applicaiit. Shri P. Diwakai-, Sr\ the respondent no. 1. Shri Prashant Mishj Deo, Govt. Adv. for the St Heaixl. Develoibment This is mi applicat4 the proceedings in compl^ by this Court in W.P. 134-| V/hile disposing of given to the petitioner t.he| before the Raipur was to be decided bv the perlod of two mont.hs| represeutation in Counsel for ttie petij passed iu time but. Since orders have petition has become infri.i| The petition is dism| accorclalnce subse^uentl; cbj^ld41r1 ^l^dT^*tel^'<f^^l< i|?^f^3^?T astava, Sr. Adv. with Smt. Smita Ghai, Adv. with Shri P.R. Pataiikai', Adv. for pa, Addl. Adv. General with Shri U.N.S. late, ^n. for extension of time for completing 'l^ance of order dated 15-2-2005 passed •^/2002. |Lhe W.P. 1344/2002, a direction was ^'ein to submit a vsuitable representation qt)ment. Authority withiu 15 days, wliich ^aipur Development Authority^ within a from the date of receipt of the with resolution. fcioner submits that. orders could not be orders have been passed. been passed by the petitioner, this dctuous. |.ssed as infructuous. __-—-^ Fakhrudd'n judge P.T.O.