1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1889 OF 2005 Surendra Jagannath Ghagtare & Anr... Petitioners Vs. Assistant Superintendent and Ors. ... Respondents Ms. Anita Borkar for Petitioner. Mrs. S.M. Dandekar, A.G.P. for R. Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. S. Chaurasia i/by A.M. Sarogi for R. Nos. 3 to 6. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2006 DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2006 DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The Petitioner had moved by chamber summons in the suit to be added as party. That has been rejected. It will be open to the Petitioners to challenge the said by appropriate proceedings. Considering the controversy and the facts that are required to be gone into, we do not propose to exercise our extra ordinary jurisdiction on the facts of the present case, and leave the Petitioners at liberty to take out such proceedings including by way of joinder in the suit which is pending, or o take out separate proceedings if the suit has already been dismissed. Petition disposed of. 2 (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)