IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1) Crl.M. No. M-32893 of 2008 Date of decision : 11.2.2009. ... Sukhdeep Singh @ Goldi ................ Petitioner vs. State of Punjab .................Respondent 2) Crl.M. No. M- 129 of 2009 ... Varun Kumar ................ Petitioner vs. State of Punjab .................Respondent 3) Crl.M. No. M- 132 of 2009 ... Honey @ Nadim Khan ................ Petitioner vs. State of Punjab .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. G.S. Toor and Sh. Suresh Goel, Advocates for the petitioners. Sh. P.S. Bajwa, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab ... K.C. Puri, J. (Oral) This order shall dispose of Crl.M.Nos. M-32893 of 2008, M-129 of 2009 and M-132 of 2009, as these cases arise out of the same FIR. As per allegation of the prosecution, the law was set in motion by recording the statement of Jagjit Singh, who has stated that Sukhdeep Singh and others had borrowed money from him. On Crl.M. No. M-32893 of 2008 -2- 23.10.2008 he was alone in his house. At about 10.00 P.M. he received a telephonic call from Sukhdeep Singh @ Goldi that they are standing at New Bus stand. Complainant took his revolver and went to the Bus stand. When he reached there, SukhdeepSingh @ Goldi empty handed, Varun Kumar armed with soti, Honey armed with soti, were standing. On seeing the complainant, Sukhdeep Singh raised a lalkara that Jagjit should not escape today and he be taught a lesson for demanding money. Varun Kumar gave a soti blow, which hit on the left side of the head of the complainant. The complainant tried to took his revolver out of his pant. Honey attacked him with soti on the right hand of the complainant. The revolver fell down. Sukhdeep Singh picked up the revolver and fired at the complainant with an intention to kill him. The complainant fell down and Sukhdeep Singh again fired a shot at him but that was missed. The complainant shouted 'marta marta'. Jarnail Singh s/o Nachattar Singh who was standing there said 'na maro – na maro'. In the meantime, Darshan Singh s/o Dalip Singh r/o Sahebzada Ajit Singh Nagar, came there. When the people gathered there, the aforesaid persons ran away from the spot alongwith their respective weapons and the revolver. Counsel for the petitioner has placed on file affidavit of Jagjit Singh, in which it is mentioned that the parties have compromised. Otherwise also, the injury attributed to Varun Kumar is simple in nature, whereas the injury attributed to Honey is on the right hand, which falls within the ambit of Section 325 IPC. Crl.M. No. M-32893 of 2008 -3- The accused are in custody for the last more than three months. So, without commenting upon the merits of the case, it is a fit case to allow the concession of bail to all the accused. Bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court. ( K.C. Puri ) 11.2.2009. Judge chug