IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CRIMINAL REVISION NO.130 OF 2007 Sahazad S/o Liyaquat R/o Village Dadupur, Govindpur P.S. Ranipur, Tehsil-Haridwar ……… Revisionist Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand 2. Mehraj D/o Gafoor Ahmed R/o Village Ibrahimpur P.S. Pathri, Tehsil-Haridwar District-Haridwar ……Respondents Dated: February 10, 2009 Sri Manish Arora, learned counsel for the revisionist Sri M.A. Khan, learned brief holder for the State/respondent no.1 Sri N.C. Gupta, learned counsel for respondent no.2 HON. DHARAM VEER, J. This criminal revision, preferred under Section 397/401 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter to be referred as Cr.P.C.) r/w Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, is directed against the judgment and order dated 03.02.2007 passed by Judge, Family Court, Haridwar in Case No.102/2006, Mehraj & another Vs. Sahazad. 2. Sri Manish Arora, learned counsel for the revisionist submitted that he has filed the present revision against the ex-parte order dated 03.02.2007 passed by Judge, Family Court, Haridwar, before this Court by mistake. Hence, he submitted that he does not want to press the revision and prayed that the revision may be dismissed as not pressed with the liberty to the revisionist to move an application u/s 126(2) Cr.P.C. before the trial court. Sri N.C. Gupta, learned counsel for respondent no.2 has also no objection on the prayer made by learned counsel for the revisionist. 3. In view of the aforesaid statement given by learned counsel for the revisionist, the revision is dismissed as not pressed. However, the liberty is given to the revisionist to move an application u/s 126(2) Cr.P.C. before the trial court. Interim order dated 22.06.2007 passed by this Court is hereby vacated. (Dharam Veer, J.) 10.02.2009 RG