IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2930 of 2008 ABDUL KHALIK, S/O ABDUL RASHID, R/O BALDIYA GACHHI, P.S.-AZAM NAGAR, DISTRICT-KATIHAR. ……………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 2. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KATIHAR. 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, KATIHAR. 5. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, AZAMNAGAR, DISTRICT-KATIHAR. 6. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, AZAMNAGAR, DISTRICT-KATIHAR. 7. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, TEGHARA ANCHAL AND P.S.-AZAMNAGAR, DISTRICT-KATIHAR. 8. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ TEGHARA ANCHAL AND P.S.-AZAMNAGAR, DISTRICT-KATIHAR. 9. NARAYAN PRASAD SINGH, S/O SRI SADA NAND PRASAD SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-ROGHAMGANJ, P.S.- KADWA, DISTRICT-KATIHAR. ……………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 3 30.06.2011 Since the respondent no.9 has been directed to move the Appellate Authority by an order passed in his writ application, it will be appropriate for the petitioner also to join the respondent no.9 in the proceeding before the Appellate Authority and contest his claim. The writ application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)