Civil Revision No. 4631 of 2009 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 4631 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 18, 2009 Lakshma and another ...... Petitioners Versus S.E.(P.Way) Northern Railway and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. This petition has been filed against the order dated 22.7.2009 by which the evidence of the plaintiff-petitioners was closed by order. Learned counsel states that if one opportunity is granted to the plaintiff-petitioners they would close their entire evidence at their own responsibility. It would be in the interest of justice if one effective opportunity is granted to the plaintiff-petitioners to conclude their entire evidence at their own responsibility. Consequently this revision petition is allowed. The impugned order is set aside. Learned trial Court is directed to grant one effective opportunity to the plaintiff-petitioners to conclude their entire evidence at their own responsibility Civil Revision No. 4631 of 2009 (O&M) 2 Since the main case has been decided, the pending Civil Misc. Applications, if any, are disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE August 18, 2009 sunita