1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO. 96 OF 2009 (Tarachand Tikaram Dongre & Anr. vs. Smt. Kamlabai Dhanraj Gajbhiye & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. MARCH 18, 2009. Shri Chahande, learned counsel for the appellant – original plaintiff tried to contend that Sale Deed Exh. 61 in favour of defendant No.1 has been wrongly exhibited. He further stated that the said sale deed as obtained by defendant No.1 is only to defeat the sale deed in favour of present appellants/ plaintiffs. However, after some time, the learned counsel fairly stated that there was no such plea before the Courts below and hence there is no such consideration. Insofar as Sale Deed at Exh. 61 is concerned, the lower appellate Court has found that its certified copy was given exhibit number after the defendants adduced evidence to show that original sale deed was lost. The lower appellate Court has relied upon provisions of Section 57(5) of the Registration Act and also two judgments. 2 In the circumstances, I do not find any perversity even in such approach. No substantial question of law arises in this Second Appeal. It is dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.