1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 45 OF 1992 Suryakant Machindra Parkale ... Petitioner v/s Sou.Usha Suryakant Parkale ... Respondent ALONGWITH WRIT PETITIN NO. 1882 OF 1992 Sou.Usha Suryakant Parkale ... Petitioner v/s Suryakant Machindra Parkale ... Respondent None present for the petitioner in W.P.No.45 of 1992 and for the respondent in W.P.No.1882 of 1992. Mr.P.N.Joshi for the respondent in W.P.No.45 of 1992 and for the petitioner in W.P.No.1882 of 1992. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 8TH JUNE, 2009 P.C.: 1. Both these petitions challenge the order dated 14th August, 1991 by which the application for interim maintenance filed by the wife under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act has been rejected. The husband has been directed to pay the 2 wife Rs.2000/- by way of cost of the proceedings and hence the present writ petition. 2. Mr.Joshi, learned advocate appearing for the wife states that the main appeal in the District Court has been disposed of and, therefore, the writ petitions have become infructuous. 3. Nobody appears for the husband despite notices issued to him. 4. Both writ petition stand dismissed as infructuous. ..... 3