1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY : AURANGABAD BENCH LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 169 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5710 OF 2009 Gautam s/o. Kasturba Sawji - - - Appellant versus 1. Babulal s/o. Parashram Patel died through his L.Rs. Sau. Vijaya w/o. Harikishan Tambakhuwala and others. - - Respondents Shri R. F. Totala, Advocate for the appellant. Shri R. R. Mantri, Advocate holding for Shri S. S. Patel, Advocate for respondents Nos.(i) to (v). CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. Dated : 22nd September 2009 PER COURT: 1. Learned Single Judge has given sound and cogent reasons while rejecting writ petition. He has also referred to earlier round of litigation wherein application for amendment was rejected by learned trial Judge and that the said order was challenged before this Court and further that the said petition came to be disposed of. 2 It is to be noted that while said petition was disposed of, the petitioner has neither sought any leave of this Court to renew the request before the appellate Court or to challenge the order passed by learned trial Court rejecting application for amendment before appropriate forum. 2. In that view of the matter, we see no infirmity in the order passed by learned Single Judge warranting interference in the appellate jurisdiction. Hence, letters patent appeal is rejected. ( N. D. DESHPANDE, J. ) ( B. R. GAVAI, J. ) pnk/lpa16909