1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 5574 of 2011 alongiwth CWP No. 5611 of 2011. Decided on: 1.8.2011 1. CWP No. 5574 of 2011. Rajander Pal ....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others. …Respondents 2. CWP No. 5611 of 2011. Prem Lata & another ....Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others …Respondents The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim the benefit of ad hoc service followed by regular service for the purpose of pension and increments. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered 2 in their favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in LPA No.36 of 2010, Sita Ram vs. State H.P. 2. Learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. Petitioners submit that they would file appropriate representation(s) furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for them to do so. 3. Therefore, the writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondents concerned to examine the matter, after verifying the facts, in the light of the judgment referred to above and take appropriate action thereon within a period of four months from the date of the production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition(s) and the copy of the judgment referred to above. 4. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. August 01, 2011 (Justice Sanjay Karol), (hl) Judge.