HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MANo.41 of 2009 Appeaiants ^ B^" Respondents 1. Abdul Jabbar, S/o Abdul Subhan, Aged about 65 years (dead) through LRs. ofappellant: a. Sahidun Nisha W/o late Abdul Jabbar, aged about 75 years. b. Abdul Jimal s/o late Abdul Jabbar, aged about 55 years. c. Abdul Naffn S/o late Abdul Jabbar, aged about 50 years. d. Abdul Hakim s/o late Abdul Jabbar, agedabout48years e. Abdul Gaffar S/o late Abdul Jabbar, agedabout 45 years. f. Abdul Sattar S/o late Abdul Jabbar, aged about 45 years. All are R/o Masanganj, Madhyanagri chowk, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (CG). g. Guishan Bee W/o Mustaq, aged about 53 years R/o Madan Mahal, Jabalpur, Distt. Jabalpur (MP). h. Kamroon Nisha W/o Salim, aged about 46 years R/o Pandri Raipur, Distt.Raipur(CG). i. Bano Aged about 33 years W/o Asif j. Julekha aged about 32 years W/o Ramjan, Both are R/o Mangia; Bllaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (CG). k. Guddi aged about 33 years W/o Raju Khan R/o Talapara, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur(CG). Versus 1. Mohammad Kasim Qureshi S/o Hajimuddin Qureshi (dead) through ^ L.Rs. of respondent: a. Mohammad Ibrahim Qureshi s/o Mohammad Kasim,aged about 50 years, R/o Shankar Nagar, Raipur. , Qr. No. LIG 135 Distt. Rajpur (CG). b. Mohammad Ismaie! Qureshi S/o Mohammad Kasim, aged about 50 years r/o Raja Talab, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG). c. Mohammad Sharif Qureshi S/o Mohammad Kasim, aged about 45 years, R/o Raja Talab, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG). ^<^ d. Umraon Bee W/o Ahmed Hussain, aged about 50 years, R/o Nehru Nagar, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG). e. Samin @ Sakeela D/o Mohammad Kasim, aged about 28 years, R/o Banjari Chowk, Raipur, Distt. Raipur 2. State of Chhattisgarh through Collector, Biiaspur (CG). APPEAL U/0 43 (1) (C) OF CODE QF CIVIL PROCEDURE. (Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Mr. N.K. Aaarwai. J.l Sahu Present : Shri Hanuman Prasad Agrawal, Advocate for the appeilants. Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Panet Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 13th day ofApril, 2009) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the appeltants, on instruction, seeks permission of this court to withdraw this appeai with liberty to avail appropriate remedy that may be availabie to him under the provisions of law. Prayer is ailowed. 2. Consequentiy, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the above stated liberty. No order asto costs. 3. Learned counsel for the appeiiants prays that certified copy of the impugned order be returned to him. 4. Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the impugned order on counsei's furnishing authenticated true copyofthesame. 5. Consequently, a!I pending applications stand disposed of. i , Sd/- | 1 N.K.Agarwal | 1 Judge I