\(- ^e?. HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C, No.102/2007 SinaleBench: Hon'bieShriDiiiRRaosahebDeshmukh.J. 1 VishnuramBhagat, S/o Late ManiOraon 2. Mutu, alias IVluneshwar, S/o Mani Oraon. 3. Sohan Bhagat, S/o Late Bechua Oraon, 4. Boluya, S/o Late Bandhu Oraon. 5. Sani Oraon, S/o Late Bandhu Oraon. 6. 7. 1. 2. 3. 4. Baleshwar Oraon, S/o 1-ate Ghani Oraon Suresh Oraon, Minor Through Natural Guardian, Elder Brother Baleshwar Oraon, S/o Late Ghani Oraon. S. No. T Mararoma, Thana Thethitagar, District Gumla, S. No. 2, Silam Ambatoli, Thana Raidih, District Gumla (Bihar), Sl. No. 3, Khora Makuatoli, Thana Gumla, Si No. 4 to 7 Putri, Ghoura Thana, VERSUS SurjuOraon, S/o BechuOraon. ; Darapn Qraon, S/o Bechu Oraon. Manchabn Oraon, S/o Beebu Oraon. ,._-%''-^^ . -.. BaxOraon,S/oLate@utuOradnT ; All rssidents of Putrichoura, Thana Jashpumagar. Present: S.R.J. Jaiswal.counselfortheapplicants.^ Qi=?ALORDER (Passed on 22"° March, 2007) The following oral orcier DiiipRaosaheb Deshmukh.J. the Court was passed by This M.C.C. is being disposed offinally atthe stage of admission withoutnoticetothenon-applicants. •-2. Heard. ^^^i^g^ twssswssssessi^ii'iss^^ssss::.: S'^S.&.ast.-d^sSsi'.s,;^^^^ Sf^-, .A^';r§^s.,s£iKF^'S3is ^ -A 3. For the reasons mentioned thereinin, the application M.C.C. No. 102/2007 is ailowed in view ofthefact that process fee was paid on the next day i.e. 14.12.2006, after a week's time was granted by this Court on 13.12.2006. The oniy default was that the appeilant paid process fee for issuance of noticeson the non-applicants by ordinary post whereas it ought to have been paid for issuance of notice by Registered Post. F.A. No. 134/1996 is restored, subject to payment of costs of Rs.100/- with the High Court Legal Aid Committee within a week. F.A. No. 134/1996 be iisted for hearing in the next week. Kvr "-•"•^.T*" "" JudgP /' f IIJI ;l