IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revision No. 2304 of 2010 Satnam Singh @ Satta .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. S.S. Chadha, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.S. Jattana, Addl.A.G, Punjab for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has impugned the order passed by the Special Judge, Ferozepur, who has declined to release the vehicle involved in carrying psychotropic substance on the ground that possibility of use of such vehicle if released on superdari for such like activities, cannot be ruled out. This observation cannot be held to be unjustified to call for any interference in the impugned order so passed. Since the counsel contends that once no proceedings have been initiated to confiscate the vehicle, the same can be released on superdari. May be it is so, but to release or not to release the vehicle on superdari is the discretion of the Court, which is holding the trial. If particular case property is needed for the purpose of trial, the prayer to release the same on superdari can always be declined but on relevant consideration. The considerations, which are taken into consideration, are valid and would not call for any interference. Dismissed. November 23, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE