mm m @ HIGH CGURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 4460 of 2004 Petiticner Ram Dhan Pandey 3/0 Late D. P. ‘ Pandey, aged about 6‘4 Vears resident of Viuage. Pachori, District Janjgir Champa (CG) Versus Respcnden'cs 1. T, e$tate of Chhattisgarh, Thwughthe Secretary Department of Education 0K5 Buéding Raipur. Di3trict Education Offmer, Janjgir Champa 3. Acccuntant Genera: {Acccunt & Hakdari) Fafadeeh Eiiaspur Road Raipur (ca) WRtT PETITGIN UNDER ARTBCLE 2251227 9F THE éGNSTITUTION OF INDIA Single Bench : Hon‘bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Aiok Pandey. Advocate for the petitioner. chri V. V. S. Murthy, Deputy Advccate Genera; for the respondents No.1 & 2. hri S. K. Beriwat, standing Counse! for the resporrdent No.3. h) u Q v ORAL cRaER (Passed on this 315‘ day or January, 2008) 1. Learned counsei appearirtg for the petitioner submits that the petitiener retired from eervice on 39.4.2002, on attaieing the age of superannuation. A3 per the statement ef G.P.F. ameunts dated March, 2962 (Annexure PH}, issued by the effice of the nccountant Generai, totai amount of Rs. 1053871- was iying in the G.P.F. account of the petitioner. Learned cooneei further submits that as per the orders (Annexure P/2 and P/3) of the Accountant General total Rs. 52,919l- { Rs. 3%04 + 14615l-) has been paid to the petitioner and balance amount of Rs. 52468i- has not heeh paid, till date. Shri s. K. Beriwai, teamed Standing Coensei appearing for the respondent No.3. per cont a. submits that the statement of GP. . accounts (Annexure Pfi) was a provisional statement, which was issued whiie the pet§t§cner was én servéce. After ietiremem of the matiticner. at the time sf fuii and fma! semement of the G.P.F‘ accaunt, en scrutiny. §t was faund' that the petitioner had made G,P.F. withdrawa!s cf Rs. 20.060!- in the month ct Jane. 1%98 and Rs. 38,000i- in the manth of March, 2000. He further submits that Vide letter datee 4.3.2005 (Annexure RH) the petitioner was informee that fult and finat dues towards G,P.F. hats been made te the pettttener ane the petitioner was asked t0 tn erm the office of the Acceuhtant Geherat. if there ts any dtsereeancy. accerdthg to the setittoner. Havtng heard teamed eeunset appearing tor the parties, it appears that the ciaim at the petitioner is based on the tentative statement issued in March, 2002, which on veritieatioh, was net found correct. Aecording te earned counsei appearing for the respondent No3, the petitioner has not replied to the letter dated 4.3.2605 (Annexure RH) and has approached to this Court or payment of haianee amount, on the basis of a tentative statement. The peti ioner ought to have submitted the response to the letter dated 4.3.2005. issued by the Accoantant General. Thus, no relief can be granted in this petition. However. the petitioner is at iberty to submit his repiy to the letter dated 4.3.2095 (Annexure r i). 'rithin a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the w E ofnce of the Accountant Genera! shail settie the dispute finaily and if some amount remains to be payabie. the same shail be paid within a )5.. E§: period of two weeks, thereafter. This petition is disposed of, accordingly. hie order asto costs. Sd/— sarish K. Agnmom- Judge Thakur .. .... .. (i