IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRIMINAL REVISION NO.2493 OF 2011 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: OCTOBER 14, 2011 Harnek Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of UT, Chandigarh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Ms.Sushma Chopra, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has hardly been given any sentence on the basis of his conviction. The prayer for reducing the same, to me, appears unjustified. Otherwise, the conviction of the petitioner has been recorded on the basis of evidence led. The submission that it is highly improbable to believe that a person would enter the house of a Judicial Officer may appear little creative, but it would depend upon the facts and circumstances proved on record. The evidence establishes the offences alleged against the petitioner and, thus, would not call for any interference. Dismissed. October 14, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE