IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.7606 of 1998 Between: M/s. A.K. Poultries, Somaram Village, Medichal Mandal, Rangareddy District, rep. by its Proprietor Sri Kailasa Amarnath S/o. Narsing Rao, H.No. 5-1-226, Old Ghasmandi, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Debt Recovery Tribunal, Krishi Bhavan, Hudson Circle, Bangalore - 560 002. 2 State Bank of Hyderabad, (S.I.B) Gunfoundry, Hyderabad. 3 Sri Lakshminarayana Recovery Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Krishi Bhavan, Hudson Circle, Bangalore. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, preferably a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents 1 and 3 in not entertaining the applications filed under Sec.22 (2) (g) & (h) and 27 of the Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial institutions Act, 1993 and in putting the 26.88 acres of land situated in Sy.Nos. 8/4, 10, 13/A, 13/B, 13/C, 16, 18/9, 18/4, 18/5, 18/14, 18/18, 178, 180/A, 180/B, 181/A, 181/B, 181/C, Somaram Village, Medchal Mandal, Rangareddy District, without any manner or right as the 2nd respondent is only holding first charge in respect of 4 acres of land, as illegal, contrary to law and in deliberate violation of principles of natural justice and violtive of Articles 14, 19 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner :MR.D.HANUMANTHA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: MR.E.RAMANADHAM The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.7606 of 1998 ORDER: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Eswaraiah) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, the interim orders granted on 09-07-1998 and 19- 08-1998 stand vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J ________________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J Dated: 22-01-2009 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KRD}