HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSe^tH, BIIASPUR W.P. (St No. 7283 of 2007 PETITIONER RB8PONDBNTS Satish Ramteke, scged 37 years, S/o Shri Bhagirathi Ramteke, Assisteat Grade II, Janpad Paachayat Koffibeda, R/o Koflibcda (Pakhaajor) Tahsil - Pakhaajor District Uttar Bastar Kanker (Clihattisgarh) Versus 1 StateofChhattisgarh, Thiough fhe Secretaiy, Pauchayat aad Rural Developineut Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mautralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2 The Conuaissioner, OsGBce of Development Coauuissioner, (Einployiucat Guarantee CeIQ, Vikash Bhawan, Civil Liaes Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Director, Pauchayat and Social WeMare Department, Directorate, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Maatralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 4. The CoBector, District Uttar Bastar Kanker (C.G.) S. The CIrief Executive Officer, Zila Paachayat-Uttar Bastar Kaaker District Uttar Bastar Kanker (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDBR ARTICLE 226 OF THB COtraTITUTIOM OF IHDIA Appearaace: ShriJ.N. Nande, couiMelfor fhe pctitioner. copy, Shri Ajay Dwivedi, I^aael Lawyer for the Statc on advaace OR&L ORDER (10.12.2007) SXJMILKUMARSINHA^J. Heard. Learacd cotinsel for the petitioner subinits fhat fhe petitioner has been suspended on fictitious grounds. He also W.P.(S)No.7283/2007 Shyna subruits that fhere is a provision of appeal in the Riiles itsetf, but the petitioner has vlsited fhe High Court iastead offiling appeal. In view of fhe fact fhat fhere is a remedy of appeal agaiast the order of suspension, as contended by leamed counsel for fhe petitioner aad the remedy is ef&cacious reniedy, I am not incliaed to admit this petition at fhis st^e. The petition has no inerit aad fhe same is dismissed at the luotion stage itself. However, fhe petitioner staall be free to avail appxopriate statutoiy reinedy iu fhis regaid. —— Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge