IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 6013 of 2009 Between: K.Venkata Rao, S/o. K.Venkatanayakulu, R/o. Siva Sai Apartments, Gopuram Road, 1st Left, Puttaparthy-34 ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House Officer, Puttaparthy Urban Police Station, Puttaparthy, 2 The Superintendent of Police, Ananthapur. 3 The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Puttaparthy, Ananthapur. 4 Kolla Chandra Bhanu, S/o. K.Dasaradah Ramaiah, R/o. H.No.16-11-477/6/4, Flat No.204. Venu Kyajil Apartment, Near Briliant Grammer School, Dilsuknagar-36 5 Kaddila Satyam @ M.Satyam, S/o. Mandala Venkatayya, R/o. Kammavaripalli, Gopuram Main Road, Puttaparthy, Ananthapur District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents Nos.1 to 3 in not taking action against the petitioners representation dated 14-03-2009 as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents No.1 to 3 to take action against the respondents No.4 and 5 by considering the petitioners representation dated 14.03.2009 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.N.RAMACHANDRA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioner questioning the action of respondents 1 to 3 in not taking any action against respondents 4 and 5 herein pursuant to his representation dated 14.3.2009. On the earlier occasion, when the writ petition was taken up, the learned Government Pleader for Home has taken time to get instructions and today he submitted that pursuant to the complaint dated 14.3.2009 of the petitioner, a case has already been registered against respondents 4 and 5 and the matter is under investigation. In the circumstances, since action has already been initiated on the complaint of the petitioner, the writ petition is closed requiring no further orders. N.V.RAMANA,J DT.6.4.2009 msv