MC 1974/2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P K MUSAHARY Heard Mr. B. Chakrabarty, learned counsel for the applicant. This application has been filed for correction of typographical mistakes that cr opped up in the order dated 21.11.2008 passed by this court in M.C. No. 2376/200 4 in MFA No. 101/ 2004. It has been submitted by Mr. Chakrabarty, learned counsel that in the order date d 21.11.2008 passed in M.C.No. 2376/2004, instead of ’Bengali Daily’, it should be ’Assamese Daily’. He further submits that the above matter relates to effectu ation of substituted service of notice upon the opposite parties through paper p ublication as directed by this court vide order dated 21.11.2008. I have heard the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant/appel lant and also perused the order dated 21.11.2008 passed by this court in misc. c ase, aforementioned. Accordingly, the order dated 21.11.2008 passed by this court in M.C. No. 2376/20 04 in MFA No. 101/2004, so far as, it relates to phrase ’Bengali Daily’, stands corrected as ’Assamese Dailly, Dainik Asom’ and the same be read as ’Assamese Da ily, Dainik Asom’. With the above directions, the misc. case stands disposed of. The applicant/appellant shall take the necessary steps within a week from today. After the substituted notice is published in the newspapers concerned, the appli cant/appellant shall file the same alongwith an affidavit before this court.