IN THE HON*BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (Sl No.rf"2)ST/2011 PETITIONER Ashok Kumar Sahu, aged 52 years, S/o. Shri Jagdish Sahu, Head Master, Government Primary School Purena, Block Fingeshwar, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS ^. ^)-^ ,<»•' ^^°\^ ...»•"'c^<-^.- t€^<y y M ^*^••'" VERSUS 1.-^ State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary School Education Department Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. ^ District Education Officer, Raipur (C.G.) 3. ^ Block Education Officer,|Fingeshwar, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) / 4. Collector Raipur, (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLEJS26 OP THE CQNST3TUTIONOF INDIA FOR ISSUANCB OF WRIT IN THB NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION, QUO-WARRANTO, ORDER/DIRECTION IN THE LIKE NATURE ^^T^Tf^rNF HqTa^aB-qN,- '?;'.^-: Deepti 'Sa" TSf •^ll-qKrl^, y>Tl|v4^|(o, [®ldt^!j,< k2v^.:^.Qlji *ll*1^TTCT»^|ch "I """ • "^pf 200 3^?r TR^F (icitj[s<<^T) ^"^TW ^R^T 3H^T SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mol 05-12-2011 qr)nf<n<fli *ii^<rl<f'^f^fl' ^^K ^ 3TRTH 377^1 nan Shrivastava, J. Shrj S.SgRajput, counseli 6r the petitioner. Shri Ar^ Sao, Governnhent Advocate for the State / respondents on advance copy. Vearnec^counsel for the p|etitioner submits that against transfer order dated 14/7/2011, he had submitted rebresentatioh to the Executive Head of the State who directed the subordinate officers to amend the transfer order as is reflected from the memo dated 21/7/11 b any decision on petitioner's repr^ Learned State counsel si| be considered in its proper perspj On the statement so mad finaliy disposed off however d| respondent No.4 - Coliector, R^ petitioner in accordance with lali receipt of copy of this order. in case, the petitioner is his representation. iJLit tiJJ date, the competent authority has not taken ^sentation. (bmjts that the representation of the petitioner will tective and decisjon on the same wili be taken. |e by iearned counsei for the State, this petition is Irecting the competent transfer authority nameiy lipur to take decision on the representation of the N within a period of three weeks from the date of Dot relieved, he shali not be reiieved tiil decision of Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^TO^ ^^iN g^n^^ u:5Rr^Tr^-s{.s/< 40—2/201i—i ,50,000.