Criminal Misc.-M No. 23424 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. -M No. 23424 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 29.8.2011 Gulzar .. Petitioner v. State of Haryana .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Pawan Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Vermani, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Balraj Singh, Advocate for the complainant. ... Rajesh Bindal J. Prayer in the present application is for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in FIR No. 70 dated 6.6.2011, registered under Sections 147, 149, 304 IPC, Police Station, Raipur Rani. However, later on offence under Section 304 IPC was converted into Section 302 IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that no specific injury has been attributed to the petitioner. In fact, the injured himself got DDR recorded on 5.6.2011. He stated before the police that he had suffered injuries on his left hand finger, arm and leg. He had himself gone to the hospital, which shows that no serious injury was suffered by him. Learned counsel for the State, while referring to the post- mortem report, submitted that the deceased had suffered internal injuries as well. The report shows fracture of 4th and 5th ribs at the posterio-lateral aspect in the ribs; laceration on posterio-lateral side left lung in pleural cavities; laceration on posterio-lateral side of left lung with haemthorax Criminal Misc.-M No. 23424 of 2011 [2] and stomach and its contents, muscles bones and joints. He further submitted that the injuries, which have been mentioned by the deceased in a complaint to the police immediately after the incident also find mention in the post-mortem report. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner has been specifically named in the FIR; he along with others caused injuries to the deceased and further in the post-mortem report, besides external injuries which have been referred to by the deceased in the complaint to the police, there were internal injuries as well, which he suffered on being attacked by the accused party, in my opinion, the petitioner does not deserve concession of pre-arrest bail. Dismissed. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 29.8.2011 mk