1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 5363 of 2008 Gopal v. MSSIDC and ors ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr A. Parchure, Adv for petitioners Mr R.K. Deshpande, Adv for respdts. Coram : D.D. Sinha and A.P. Bhangale, JJ Dated : 30th January 2009 1. Heard Mr Anand Parchure, learned counsel for petitioners and Mr R.K. Deshpande, learned counsel for respondents. Learned counsel for the respondents has made a categorical statement that so far as the quantity of coal required to be supplied to the petitioner by respondent no.2 as per terms and conditions of the agreement dated 20.5.2008 at this stage has not been reduced by respondent no.2. Respondent no.2 has only issued advertisement dated 23.11.2008 whereby applications are invited to register the demand for supply of coal and, therefore, on this count the petition as on today is premature. It is submitted that any action in future if taken by respondent no.2 2 shall be in accordance with the terms and conditions of contract as per the procedure applicable in this regard. 2. In view of the statement made by respondent no.2, at this stage, cause of action is premature and we hope and trust that in future any action which is required to be taken by respondent no.2 shall be in accordance with law i.e. in accordance with the terms and conditions of contract entered into by respondent no.2 with various suppliers as well as in view of the terms and conditions of tender documents. With this observation writ petition is disposed of. Judge. Judge. hsj