IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.3440-M of 2010 Date of Decision:4.4.2011 Sukhvinder @ Shonki .... Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. S.K. Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Rana, D.A.G. Haryana. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the law laid down by the Full Bench in the case of Jang Singh v. State of Punjab 2008(1) RCR (Criminal) 323, he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file proper application in the appeal, which is alleged to be pending in this Court. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 4.4.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE