1 (22) WP 8526/10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Amk WRIT PETITION NO.8526 OF 2010 Sunil Sudhakar Telkar .. Petitioner Vs. Rachita Sunil Telkar .. Respondent Ms. Varsha Palav for the Petitioner. Mr. Aslam Khan for the Respondent. CORAM : MRS. ROSHAN DALVI, J. Date : 29th November, 2010 P.C. 1. Counsel on behalf of the Petitioner husband states that the dispute between parties is required to be settled. It would be either an amicable settlement by which the parties would reconcile or any amicable divorce upon payment of lumpsum maintenance amount. That aspect is required to be considered, settled or agitated in the Family Court. I have already observed in my order dated 25th October, 2010 that the impugned order prima facie seems to be absolutely correct. The husband has paid the arrears of maintenance to the wife. Parties to consider options of settlement in the Family Court. 2. Writ Petition is dismissed. ( ROSHAN DALVI, J.)