1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.174/2009 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2917/2007 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.212/2001 Western Coalfields Limited ...Versus... Surendra R. Shivhare and another -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Shri M. Anilkumar, Adv. for applicant] [Shri A.R. Prasad, Adv. for non-applicant No.1] CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 09.04.2009 Heard. The only ground made out by the learned Counsel for review applicant is that there are judgments to show that bias could be subject matter of challenge in appropriate proceedings and therefore, on that ground the impugned order could not have been made. Secondly, he submits that the mandate of the arbitrator has not been terminated. Submissions were considered when the impugned order was passed. This Court found that the 2 original applicant had lost confidence against the arbitrator particularly because the order was set aside. This Court, therefore, found that in fairness it was necessary to have another arbitrator. I do not find that there is any error on the face of record as canvassed by learned Counsel for the review applicant. Misc. Civil Application is dismissed with costs of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred Only) payable to Advocate Shri Prasad. JUDGE ssw