1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Eighteenth day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.10002 of 2011 1.PALANIKUMAR 2.KARTHIKEYAN 3.KALEESWARI 4.KANNAN 5.MUTHUCHAMY 6.SOUNDARARAJAN 7.JEYARAMALINGAM ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NARIKUDI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT, CRIME NO.197 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.K.DINESH BABU Advocate For Respondent : MR. A.RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 506(i) of IPC in Crime No.196 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners were charged under Sections 147 and 506(i) of IPC and the alleged occurrence has been taken place on 1.8.2011 and no one sustained injury and investigation is considerably over and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.side) would submit that the case has been registered against eight persons and the petitioners are arrayed as A1, A2, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8 and except A3, all the other accused come forward with this application and there is one previous case against A1 to A3 under Section 302 IPC and investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4.Considering the rival submissions made by both sides, the alleged occurrence has been taken place on 1.8.2011 and the case has been registered under Sections 147 and 506(i) of IPC and husband of the de-facto complainant has been murdered by A1 to A3 who were already enlarged on bail and the case has been registered under Sections 147, 506(i) of IPC and even though the petitioners were not arrested, they neither interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukottai and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. sd/- 18/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARUPPUKOTTAI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NARIKUDI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S.K.DINESH BABU Advocate SR.No.28152 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10002 of 2011 Date :18/08/2011 TR : 19.08.2011: 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/