r^ , . Mv L^^ z\\ 0/t;^ ^:g^ "ri:?3HT%< ror [Pegislrar, M. P. Siat\ Ae/m. Tribunsl. RAI^UP K^ IN THE li.P. STATE ADMINISTR^TIVE TRIBUNAL BENCH, RAIPUR ^v^-^^—-^ j6^.i^.^J^ ! ADMINISTR^TIVE TI ^s^ O.A.NO^Q^^ >2000 APPLICANT : Dr. GAHARWAR SHANKAR SINGH S/o Late Shri Muneshwar Singh aged 49 years, Deputy Director of Veterinary Services, In-charge Joint Director, Vety. Servlces, Bilaspur (M.P.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^^v y^^^ sy' (1) STATE OF M.P. - through The Secretary, Vety. Department Mantralaya, Bhopal• (2) Additional Chief Secretary, (Principal Secretary, G.A.D.) Govt. of M.P. Bhopal. (3) The Director, Vety. Services, M.P*, Bhopal. (4) Dr. R.N. SAXENA, Additional Director, Vety. Services, Bhopal. (5) Dr. V.K. JAIN, Deputy Director, Vety- Servlces, Directorate, Bhopal (6) Dr. B.B. SRIVASTAVA, In-char9e, Joint Director, Vety. S. Bhopal. (7) Dr. R.S. SHRIMAL, In-charge, Joint Director, Vt* Ser. Indore. (8) Dr. V.K. HAJARI, In-Charge- Joint Director, Vety. Services, SAUGAR. ' Contd..2.. ^ ^—- 9 • • 1 <G •• • (9) Dr.G.K.MATHUR, Deputy Director, Vety. Services, SAJAPUR (10) Dr.S.K.GONDAL. In-charge, Joint Director, Vety.S, JABALPUR. (11) Dr.S.K.SONI. Deputy Directory, Vety.Services, VIDISHA. (12) Dr.D.S.CHOUHAN, In-charge, Joint Director, Vety.Services,GWALIOR (13) Dr.S.K.MISHRA, In-charge, Joint Director, Vety.Services, JAGDALPUR. (14) Dr.M.N.SIDIQUI Renderpest Officer, Vety.Deptt; BHOPAL APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 19 OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL SET, 1985. DETAILS OF APPLICATION : ^^§^.€maerit- % ^.15i' aa ^:' Cayrt. Atfed,6-»AA«2'OOQ ^f200^. ^,^^•^(1 Advacax^ ms @1 f oi-- APi-1icant« w .i.'he-vnien' of'" t; Thr.ougA"secx'eta-i.yJ.':" D epa Emea'c of Hc "®:» S-e^xe^a^lat-e^ MI ^^^r ka I)A, ^TT^T^T [<Tli<=h 3Tli[¥T 9h^i(=b ^f^a Praveen "^rc[^TRMZ[, ^Tll^4!^. fG1<ni^li< ,^^.k^/..^.20/..^ ,„ o r/ ^rHC<TT9h*<lch f^^T' ^H^T'^TTW^Frf^T SB: Hon?ble Shri Manindra Mlohan.Shriyastava, J. 25.03.2010 When the matter was c^lled petitioner and the matter was| none appears for the petitionei Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy., (|rovt. Advocate for the State. The petition is therefore [dismissed for want of prosecution. chl^t<n<fll TTT^tf'? 'fe^ <p3i^l< "^ 3^^R'STT^T for hearing, none appeared for the passed over. Even in the second round, Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Jude [^^fe^