1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.08.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE R.MALA Crl.O.P.(MD)NO.9735 of 2011 C.Rajalakshmi ... Petitioner Versus The State Rep. By The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District in crime No.8 of 2006 ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to direct the Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli to complete the trial in C.C.No.389 of 2006 at the earliest within the stipulated time to be granted by this Court and direct the respondent to extend their cooperation for the same. For Petitioner : Ms.T.Jayanthi Ranee For Respondents : Mr.K.V.Rajarajan, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) O R D E R This petition is filed seeking for a direction, directing the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District to complete the trial in C.C.No.389 of 2006 at the earliest within the stipulated time to be granted by this Court and direct the respondent to extend their cooperation for the same. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, a case has been registered in Crime No.8 of 2006 under Section 498(A) I.P.C. He would further submit that after investigation, charge sheet has been filed, which was taken on file in C.C.No.389 of 2006 before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District. He would further submit that already P.W.1 and P.W.2 were examined but they have not been cross examined. He further submitted that even though charge sheet has been filed in the year 2006, the case is yet to be disposed of and hence, he come forward with the present application. 3. Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side). 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the complaint has been given in the year 2006 and the investigation is over and charge sheet has been filed, which was taken on file in C.C.No.389 of 2006. As per the affidavit filed by the petitioner in paragraph No.4 it was specifically mentioned that already P.W.1 and P.W.2 were examined, but they were not cross examined and they filed petitions under Sections 317 Cr.P.C. for condoning their absence. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5. Considering the same and also considering the fact that since the case of the year 2006, I am inclined to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District, to dispose of the case in C.C.No.389 of 2006 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order on day today basis. 6. With the above observation, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (Writs) /True copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District. 2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1CC TO MR.A.HAJA MOHIDEEN, ADVOCATE SR.25688 Vsm SR : 22.08.2011 : 2p/5c Crl.O.P.(MD)NO.9735 of 2011 02.08.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/