IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.12901 of 2006 Between: 1 Bhooma Veera Nagi Reddy, S/o. Bal Reddy, R/o. Allagadda, Kurnool District. 2 Bhooma Shobha Nagi Reddy, W/o. Bhooma Veera Nagi Reddy, R/o. Allagadda, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONERS AND The District Election Comissioner-cum- District Collector, Kurnool and others .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners:MR. B.SARVOTHAM REDDY FOR MR.P.NAGENDRA REDDY ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons and in the circumstances stated in the accompanying affidavit, the petitioner herein prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in orally directing the petitioners to confine in the house on 20.06.2006 and not to supervise the election process by visiting various election booths as general agents on behalf of T.D.P., as bad, illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to make house arrest/detain till the election process is completed, without following due process of law in the interest of justice.” At the hearing, Sri B.Sarvotham Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration in view of completion of elections. The writ petition is therefore, dismissed as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 1st JUNE, 2009. kvni