IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16636 of 2011 01. Himanshu Verma, S/o Navin Kumar Verma, Resident of Village-Bazitpur Chakusturi, P.O.- Sahadai Buzurg, P.S.- Desri, District-Vaishali 02. Md. Miroz Iqbal, S/o Shekh Anjar Ahmd, Resident of Village-Katihar, P.O.+P.S.- Katihar, District-Katihar 03. Rakesh Kumar Singh, S/o Uday Shankar Singh, resident of village-Lahasa, P.o_Kumaripur, P.S.-Nansai, District Katihar ….. Petitioners Versus 01. B.N.Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura through its Vice-Chancellor 02. The Vice Chancellor, B.N. Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura 03. The Registrar, B.N. Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura 04. The Controller of Examination, B.N. Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura 05. The Millia Institute of Technology, Rambagh, Purnea through its Director 06. The Director, the Millia Institute of Technology, Rambagh, Purnea ….. Respondents ---------------------------------- 02. 23.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. It has been informed by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have been allowed provisionally to participate in the examination subject to result of this case. Whereas learned counsel for the University has submitted that the examination is scheduled to be conducted from today and he is not in a position to give any information or statement with regard to the petitioners. These petitioners are the student of Millia Institute of Technology, Rambagh, 2 Purnia. Some of the students have come up before this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 14143 of 2011. The case of petitioners is that their case is identical to the aforesaid case and the petitioners of that case have been allowed to sit in the examination of second year. In this view of the matter it is directed that University Authorities as well as the Director, Millia Institute of Technology, will allow the petitioners to appear in examination even for the second year with a liberty to appear in the papers of Ist year in which they failed. However, it is made clear that despite the petitioners’ appearance in the examination, their result of second year and first year shall not be published unless they clear all the requisite papers of first year and second year as per the University regulation. Accordingly the writ petition is disposed off with the aforesaid observation and direction. P.K. (Shivaji Pandey, J.)