CWP (T) No. 7684 of 2008. 12.5.2009 Present: Mr. Praneet Gupta vice counsel for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Addl. A.G. and Mr. Vikas Rathore, Dy.A.G. for the respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr. Dharamvir Sharma, Advocate for respondents No. 4 & 5. The petitioner has assailed the appointment of respondent No.5 to the post of Anganwadi Worker. Mr. Praneet Gupta, Advocate has drawn the attention of the Court to Annexure R-3. A bare perusal of Annexure R-3 reveals that it has not been signed by all the members. In fact, it has been signed only by the Pradhan. It ought to have been signed by all the members of the Selection Committee. This has also been verified from the records produced by the learned Senior Additional Advocate General. Accordingly, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties have submitted that in these circumstances, it would be more congenial if the selection process is undertaken afresh in accordance with law. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. The appointment of respondent No.5 by respondent No.4 as per Annexure R-3 is quashed and set aside. The respondent No.3 is directed to fill up the post of Anganwadi Worker strictly in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. In the meantime to protect the interests of the children, the respondent No.5 is permitted to work as Anganwadi Worker. She would cease to work immediately after the new selection. In view of these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), J. May 12, 2009. (cr)