1 pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3859 of 1010 WITH CRIMINAL APPLCIATION NO.3860 OF 2010 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3861 OF 2010 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3862 OF 2010 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3863 OF 2010 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3864 OF 2010 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3865 OF 2010 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3866 OF 2010 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3867 OF 2010 The State of Maharshtra .. Applicant Versus Namdeo Trimbak Hole ...Respondent Mr. V.B.Kondedeshmukh, APP for Applicant . CORAM:- R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED:- 6th JULY, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the State. Evidence on record clearly goes to 2 show that unauthorized connection was given to each of the farmer. Looking to the case of the prosecution and the word of each of the person who sought unauthorized connection, it is very much material and that the relevant evidence is required to be gone into. Each of the judgment by which the respondent came to be acquitted requires reconsideration. Hence each of criminal application is granted. 2. Each of Appeal is admitted. 3. Action under Section 390 of Cr.P.C. be taken against the respondent. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)