IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2978 of 2009 ANIL YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 28.1.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The bail application of the petitioner was earlier rejected on 16.5.2008. The petitioner is said to have fired on the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Doctor has not found bullet in the chest to indicate that it was a fire arm injury. I would not like to pass any comment on the Doctor report as it may adversely affect the petitioner’s case during the trial. The comment of the Doctor is not very relevant considering the nature of the injury. I do not find any reason to re-consider the bail application of the petitioner. The application is dismissed. P. Kumar (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)