IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 19319 of 2010 Date of Decision: 28.10.2010. Rohtash Kanwar --Petitioner Versus Commissioner, M.C., Faridabad and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. R.K. Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion to respondent no.1 only. Mr. Vikas Malik, Advocate present in the Court has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondent. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. The petitioner was appointed as Beldar on ad hoc basis on 11.4.1983. He was later regularized and promoted as Carpenter Mate vide order dated 10.9.1998. It is alleged that petitioner is eligible for promotion to the post of Road Inspector. It is further stated that as many as 6 posts of Road Inspector exist in the respondent-corporation and 3 posts are lying vacant. Petitioner seeks his consideration for promotion to the post of Road Inspector. He made various representations (Annexures P-3 to P-5) and also served a legal notice (Annexure P-6) in this respect but no decision has been taken thereon till date. CWP. No. 19319 of 2010 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if, respondents are directed to take decision on the representations/legal notice served by the petitioner, referred to above. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.1 to take decision on the representations/legal notice served by the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said respondent. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 28.10.2010. lucky