1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application No. 720 of 2009 In SA (St) No. 10199 of 2009 Smt Satyabhama and anr v. Nandlal and ors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Mr P.V. Vaidya, Adv for applicants Mr P.P. Kotwal, Adv for respdts 1,2 Coram : A.P. Bhangale, J. Dated : 26 th July 2010 1. Applicants seek condonation of delay of one year and seventy days caused in filing First Appeal. Applicants have claimed in the application that applicant no.3 Rama was looking after the litigation. However, since her husband’s elder brother Mohandas was seriously ill, she could not contact counsel in time. After the counsel was contacted, he took out certified copy of judgment on 4.11.2008, but again said relation was required to be admitted in the hospital. It is also submitted that thereafter son of applicant no.3 was required to be admitted in the hospital. 2. No documents in support of various contentions made were filed. Learned counsel for the applicants sought for time to furnish 2 documents in support of his contentions. Time on this count has been sought since 15.1.2010. However, till date, the counsel has not furnished necessary documents. Today, again learned counsel for applicants seeks time for the same purpose. Sufficient time has already been granted to the applicants to do the needful. Such applications cannot be adjourned for indefinite period and for asking. In fact, along with the application itself the documents should have been filed. Applicants have failed to explain the inordinate and colossal delay caused in filing the appeal. The Courts cannot show sympathy to the litigants who are lethargic, negligent and indifferent to their cause. Application is accordingly dismissed. Judge. Hsj