IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14235 of 2011 MANOJ SINGH @ MANOJ KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 17.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The informant is the son of the deceased. The father of the informant was shot dead. The F.I.R. was lodged against unknown. Since, there was no clue found by the investigating agency, the final form was submitted on 15.03.2005. On representation, the investigation was reopened, but again, the final form was submitted on 15.07.2006 since accusation was found false. Thereafter the D.I.G. Tirhut, Range visited the place of occurrence where some persons named certain persons, thereafter, the investigation again restarted but the final form was again submitted on. 02.05.2009 since the accusation was found false again. It appears that some criminal writ was also filed before this Court whereby, the S.P. was directed 2 to proceed in the matter in accordance with law. The F.I.R. was lodged against unknown. The name of the petitioner surfaced during the investigation. Till date the petitioner has not been charge sheeted in spite of the fact that the investigating agency has not found any clue. The letter of the I.G., Tirhut Range dated 03.02.2011 has been brought on record whereby, the I.G. directed to restart the investigation and arrest the accused persons. It is submitted by learned counsel for the State that it is found during the investigation that the petitioner had some dispute with the deceased prior to the occurrence. Considering the suspicious nature of evidence and the fact that other accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial 3 Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sakra P.S. Case No. 152 /2004, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)