IB the Righ CGin?'k o£ ^udicatm-e o£ Cha't'fcisgarh a-fe Bllaspi^r.. CIVIL BEVISIOR No. '- /2Q03 Pe'titioners 1, ^ vs Respondaa'ks ^?^ ^s^...'* --:^-::.^" ^y' South Eastern Coalfields Ltd., throagh Chief General Hanager, Gevra Area, P.0. Gevra F'reject, Bistrj.c-b s Korba, Chat'tisgarh. -mo^; _ - Atiraa Patel son of-Hanunan Patel, OB 681, Mpika Colony, Soath Eastern Coalfields L-td*, Tahsil Ka-fcghora, District s Katghora, Cha-ttisgarh. Sahodri Bai widow ef Bam Rrasad ^ed abou'fc 57 y^ras. ; ATan Kuaar son of late Ran Rrasad Yadav ageei sboa-fc 37 years. Botto the residlea'bs of village Sarkho, Tahsil Janjgir, ©istrictJanjgir- Chanpa, Chattisgarh. REVISION PETITIONtBider seetion 1J.5 of ^ it'^,1 i^ li.t? ua«,(l&BiIs:.)it>gi..juE*ae:5 XI-HC-22 /., •-.: an^r^il ft-fi* 3TI§5T Sib*1tt^ ^TT?CT ' T°? •<(I<4I<'11, »Tliu'16, fs|<11*fy 3nNr 'q3w _^/- C.S^L35.^°3 ''^1 200 WWIT tb*ii<n ft^p" 311^1 TCIWdfCT Addillional claiidant n/1/2004 Shri J.A. Lohani, courisi| Learned counsel si naine of respondentno.3 w^a^ has not been inentioned in thfc Heard. The revision is agednsft passed by the Ftfth Tnbunal, Bilaspur ui C.' application filcd by the the amount of interim aUowed. Tiie facls of tlie casel Ramprasad while coming fil Junadih on his bieycle at accident and died on 27/8y sustained by him.. The resp^i petition before the Claiins tbr mterim compensation. T} vide order dated '?/5/I999 Rs.50,000/- was passed. Ag^il petitioners ]^re filed the a^] <=bf<<[<'l<ftTl TrFT^f ^ fe^ <Pfl+$K ^aiPgtf SD^I il for the petitioners. ts that in the trial court the i struck off, as such her naine cause titlc. the order dated 30/7/2003 Motor Accldent Clatiiis No.4/2002, whereby the its/respondents for relcasini of Rs.50,000/- was coialpensation ai'c that oii 19/6/1995 oue Y>m village Sarokha to village ^bout 4.00 p.in. laet wifh an 3|995, as a result of the injuries sp^ndents/elainiants filed a elaim Tr^bunal alongwith an application }ie said appUcaUon was allpwed and interim. conipeiisation of tg^lnst the said order, the present a^peal befbre the High Court ofl a iSS ^i^ XI-HC-22 -r '3~^ iiiw<, waw'w, hwwy. 3TT^?T 'tRR? K11CTI Sh*<l<t)""~"""""""""""""""'W^ 200 'f^T^T"""""""""""""" sn^TW r^-ti* siit^i st>H ^f^cr sii^i'renwBfOT -2. st^y vidb Madhya Pradesh, wherein st^y said appeal was dismisaed While passtng the im] considered the tnateri.al on re< award ofRs.50,000/- toward(s and it came to tlie conclusibn reqtured to be released. Thlsf entire material on record and| or infirmity in the unpugned oj in case the court below whil4 accordance with law came applicants are not liable and pay the couipeiisatiou, llieii that the amoiint so disbiil applicants' interest ia duly Wlth the aforesald disposed of. Consequently, M.C.P. N^. of. i ^t<il<n*ft'f tTR^tf ^ fs'<l <^t-^i< ^? siPtTiT an^r was granted. However, the order dated 14/2/2000. ip|ugned order, tlie com't below ;t;ord and found that an interiiu no fault liability was passed that the awai'd ainoutit is Court has aleo considered the |found that tfaere is no iUegaUty t-der. It is however directed that deciduig the m.atter finaUy in to the conclusion that the lit is the owner who is liable to ^roper orders vviU bc passed, so t'serl 'is indemnified and the pr(j>tected. obs^rvations, thls revision stands 1719/03 also stands disposed Sd(- Fakhruddin Judge