IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH OCTOBER 2009 / 6TH KARTHIKA 1931 Bail Appl..No. 6056 of 2009() -------------------------------------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED: ------------------------------------ REJITH KUMAR, AGED 24 YEARS, S/O.RAMESAN NAIR, VETTIPARAMBIL, RAMANKARI, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.N.K.MOHANLAL RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT: ----------------------------------------------- 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERNAKULAM SOUTH POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. SRI. M.S. BREEZ, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T. SANKARAN, J. --------------------------- B.A. No. 6056 of 2009 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 28th day of October, 2009 O R D E R When the Bail Application came up for hearing on 21/10/2009, the following order was passed: “Apprehending arrest by the Sub Inspector of Police, Ernakulam South Police Station on an accusation of having committed non bailable offence, the petitioner has filed this application for anticipatory bail. No crime number is mentioned in the Bail Application. He apprehends arrest on a petition filed by the Manager of the MSM Automobiles. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that a petition was received from the Manager of the MSM Automobiles stating that the petitioner was working there and leaving the job, the petitioner had not returned certain documents belonging to the employer. A notice was issued to the petitioner directing him to appear before the police. But, the petitioner did not turn up. B.A. No. 6056/2009 2 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that no notice, issued by the Sub Inspector of Police, Ernakulam South Police Station, was received by the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is prepared to appear before the Sub Inspector of Police, Ernakulam South Police Station. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the petitioner to appear before the Sub Inspector of Police, Ernakulam South Police Station on 25th October 2009 at 10A.M. Post the Bail Application on 28/10/2009. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner will not be arrested in connection with the case until further orders.” 2. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner has complied with the directions contained in the order dated 21/10/2009. The learned Public Prosecutor also submitted that the petitioner is not made an accused in any crime and that there is no intention to arrest the petitioner. B.A. No. 6056/2009 3 The submission made by the learned Public Prosecutor is recorded and the Bail application is closed with liberty of the petitioner to approach this court again, as and when occasion arises. K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE scm