IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.21450 -M of 2011 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : SEPTEMBER 16, 2011 KASHISH & ORS. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. BS Saini, Sr. DAG, Haryana. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 This petition has been filed under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, praying for quashing of FIR No.110 dated 02.05.2011 under Sections 323, 506, 34, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Sector 5, Panchkula (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings, on the basis of compromise dated 13.07.2011 (Annexure P-2). 2 Ajai Saini (respondent No.2), as identified by SI Lakshmi Chand, is present in Court, and has furnished his affidavit, sworn on 12.8.2011, which is taken on record. 3 In the affidavit, it has been stated that with the intervention of the respectables, the disputes have been settled by way of compromise. Respondent No.2 is not ready to proceed with the case and has no objection if the FIR is quashed. Criminal Misc. No.21450 -M of 2011 (O&M) 2 4 Learned counsel for the respondent-State contends that because the disputes have been settled by way of compromise, the State would have no objection to the quashing of the FIR. 5 Considering the fact that the disputes have been settled by way of compromise and the said fact has also been verified by the Investigating Agency, no purpose in law would be served by continuance of proceedings. 6 The petition is, accordingly, allowed. 7 FIR No.110 dated 02.05.2011 under Sections 323, 506, 34, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Sector 5, Panchkula (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings, are hereby quashed. September 16, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?