IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 5TH JULY 2007 / 14TH ASHADHA 1929 RP.No. 606 of 2007() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.1996/2001 Dated 19/03/2007 .................... : REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS ----------------------------------------------- 1. KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD, REGIONAL OFFICE, CALICUT- 673 006. BY ADV. SRI.POOVAPPALLY M.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER ----------------------- K.S.NATARAJ, 'SNEHA', CHEYAYUR HOUSING COLONY, KOZHIKODE-12. BY ADV. SRI.K.JANARDHANAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ----------------------------------- R.P. No. 606 of 2007 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 5th day of July, 2007 O R D E R Review petition is filed merely because the Division Bench judgment relied on is taken in SLP to Supreme Court. I do not think pendency of SLP is a ground for reviewing judgment. If Supreme Court reverses the judgment of the Division Bench, then of course it may entitle the petitioner to file a review petition. In the circumstances, this review petition is dismissed. However, time for compliance with the directions in the judgment is extended till 15/09/2007. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) jg