WPSS No. 2417 of 01: Old No. 19992 of 2000 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri D.S. Mehta, Adv. holding brief of Sri M.C. pant, learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State on the applications. Sri Mehta, learned counsel for the petitioner submits at bar that he does not intentd to press the writ petition at this moment and he may be permitted to make representation before appropriate authority, for redressal of his grievances. The writ petition is thus, dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioner if chooses to move representation before the competent authority, he can avail the remedy by submitting representation before the competent authority. (M. M. G., J.) 09.04.2007: NCM: WPSS No. 2417 of 01: Old No. 19992 of 2001 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Restoration Application no. 229/07:- AND Delay Condonation Application:- Heard Sri D.S. Mehta, Adv. holding brief of Sri M.C. pant, learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State on the applications. The delay condonation application has been filed for condonation of delay in filing the restoration application. I am satisfied that the grounds taken in the accompanied affidavit are sufficient to condone the delay. The application is allowed and the delay in filing the restoration application is hereby condoned. The restoration application has been filed for recall of the order dated 26.09.2006 passed by this Court by which the writ petition has been dismissed for want of prosecution. The application is sufficiently supported with an affidavit. Nothing is in rebuttal. The restoration application is allowed. Order dated 26.09.2006 is hereby recalled. Let the writ petition be restored to its original number. Both the applications stand disposed of accordingly. Put up the case after lunch. (M.M.G., J.) 09.04.2007: NCM: