1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT D.B. SPECIAL APPEAL (WRIT) NO.231/2006 against the judgment dated 11.01.05 passed in Civil Writ Petition No.2999/04. State of Raj. & Ors. Vs. Kishanlal Verma & Anr. Date of judgment : 29th March, 2006 PRESENT HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BALIA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.P. VYAS Mr. L.R. Upadhyay, Dy. Government Advocate. Mr. Arjun Purohit for the respondents. _____ Notice of the main appeal was also issued along with the notice of the application under Section 5 of Limitation Act. We are of the opinion that on undisputed facts, questions raised in this petition are fully governed by the decision of this Court in relation to grant of selection grades to the incumbent on completion of 9, 18 and 27 years of service by which it has been held that period of 9, 18 and 27 years has to be computed with effect 2 from initial date of appointment including therein the services rendered as ad hoc or temporary appointment as permissible under the Rules. We do not find any merit in this appeal as the judgment of learned single is in consonance with the aforesaid Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in State of Rajasthan and others Vs. Farooq Ahmed & 59 others reported reported in 2005(1)WLC page 1. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. [ R.P. VYAS ], J. [ RAJESH BALIA ], J. babulal/