IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28454 of 2009 GAJENDRA SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 3.8.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Finding the allegation of demand, torture and killing, petitioner’s earlier prayer for bail was rejected. Instead of making submission on the point of changed circumstance, learned counsel continued to point out the infirmity in the prosecution case that there was no eye witness, husband has not been made accused and petitioner’s remaining in custody for more than a year. Allegation against this petitioner is clear and specific, that is corroborated by witnesses also which has rightly been made ground for the refusal of petitioner to bail. As about his remaining in custody the trial court is directed to expedite the trial. In case the trial is not concluded within a period of six months, petitioner will have an option to renew his prayer for bail. This application stands rejected. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI