THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CRP No.2015/2009 Dt. 9-10-2009 CRP No.2015/2009 1. Ganesula Gangadhara Rao and others ..Petitioners V. M/s. Usha Bala Chits and Investments Private Limited, Rajahmundry represented by its Manager Pinnamaneni Venakteswara Rao. ..Respondent. CRPMP No.5521/2009 1. Ganesula Gangadhara Rao and others ..Petitioners V. M/s. Usha Bala Chits and Investments Private Limited, Rajahmundry represented by its Manager Pinnamaneni Venakteswara Rao. ..Respondent. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CRP No.2015/2009 and CRPMP No.5521/2009 ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners-appellants- defendants and Sri K.Venkatesh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-plaintiff. This revision by the appellants-defendants in ASSR No.5961/2008 on the file of Principal District Judge, Rajahmundry is directed against the orders dt. 16-12-2008 made in IA No.2393/2008 in ASSR No.5961/2008, whereunder application filed under Sec. 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 80 days in preferring the appeal has been dismissed. This Court by order dt. 5-6-2009 while issuing notice before admission stayed the execution of the decree on condition of petitioners depositing half of the decretal amount and costs within four weeks from the date of order. It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the conditional order passed by this court dt. 5-6-2009 has not been complied with. Instead of complying with the conditional order, the petitioners have come up with an application in CMPMP No.5521/2009 seeking permission to offer immovable property security of 3rd party instead of deposit of half of the decretal amount and cash. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the request of the petitioners is rejected. CMPMP No.5521/2009 is accordingly dismissed. On dismissal of CMP No.5521/2009, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks time to comply with the conditional order passed by this court dt. 5-6-2009. In view of the same, on petitioners depositing half of the decretal amount and costs within four weeks from to-day, the delay of 80 days in filing the appeal memorandum is condoned. Failure to deposit the amount so ordered, the revision petition shall stand dismissed by confirming the dismissal order passed in IA No.2393/2008 in ASSR No.5961/2008. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly allowed. No costs. ______________ A.GOPAL REDDY,J Dt.9-10-2009 Note: CC in 3 days (BO) kmr