AB 244/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE C.R. SARMA Heard Mr. B.K. Mahajan, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. B.S. Sinha, learned Addl. P.P. Assam and Ms. R. Baruah, learned counsel appe aring for the informant. I have also perused the C.D. including the statement of the victim women recorded u/s. 164 Cr.P.C. (Annexure-E). This application is filed u/s. 438 Cr.P.C. seeking pre-arrest bail in favour of the petitioners namely (1) Smti. Saraswati Thakuria, (2) Sri Jibeswar Medhi and (3) Smti. Ranjana Thakurai Medhi in connection with All Women Police Statio Case No. 166/2010 registered u/s. 498(A)/34 IPC. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and considering the m aterials available on record more particularly the statement of the victim women , I find no sufficient reason requiring custodial interrogation of the petitione rs in connection with the above case. Hence, I find it fit to extend the benefit of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners. Accordingly the interim order dated 8.12.2010 granted in favour of the petitione rs, are made absolute. Consequently the petitioners are allowed to remain on pre -arrest bail granted by the said order. The bail application stands disposed of. Return the C.D.