IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 3585 of 2002 Between: Signna Reddy Venkat Satiswara Reddy S/o S.S. Hussen Reddy D.No. 1/619-1, Nandyal Road, Tadipatri, Anantapur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C. Guntakal, Anantapur District. 2 The Chairman & Managing Director, A.P.S.R.T.C. Musheerabad, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order writ more in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not fixing the notional increments to the petitioner's pay scale during the period i.e., 23-5-97 to 13-6-2001, even though the Hon'ble Labour Court, Anantapur in its judgment I.D.No.4/99 dated 25-1-2001 has granted an "award" to the petitioner as being arbitrary, illegal and violating Art. 14, 16 & 21 of the Constitution of India and issue consequential directions to the respondents to fix all notional increments while fixing his pay scale during the period from 23-5-97 to 13-6-2001 to his present pay scale on par with his juniors with all consequential benefits for the said period. Counsel for the Petitioner: S.SURENDRA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: P.VINAYAKA SWAMY The Court made the following: ORDER: Challenging the action of the respondents in not fixing the notional increments to the petitioner’s pay scale during the period from 23-05-1987 to 13-06-2001 even though the labour court, Ananthapur in its judgment dated 25-01-2001 has granted an award to the petitioner, the present writ petition is filed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the respondents. This court cannot be an executing Court for the labour Court. If the order of the Labour Court is not implemented, the remedy is otherwise. Even otherwise, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioner made a representation to the respondents, and therefore, the respondents shall consider the same in accordance with law. Hence, the writ petition is totally devoid of merit and the same is dismissed. No order as to costs. _________________ JUSTICE K.C.BHANU Dated July 18, 2005. YCR To 1 The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C. Guntakal, Anantapur District. 2 The Chairman & Managing Director, A.P.S.R.T.C. Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 3. 2 C.D. copies.