IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.W.P. Nos. 3637, 3666 and 3677 of 2010 Decided on 2nd July, 2010. 1. CWP No. 3637 of 2010 Sant Ram …Petitioner Versus State of HP and others …Respondents 2. CWP No. 3666 of 2010 Dablu Ram …Petitioner Versus State of HP and others …Respondents 3. CWP No. 3677 of 2010 Satya Parkash …Petitioners Versus State of HP and others …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the Petitioner: Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate For the State : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. For the Private Respondents: Mr. V.B. Verma, Advocate ____________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner has prayed for following relief in the writ petition:- “ CWP No. 3637 of 2010 (i) Directing the respondents to regularize the service of the petitioner w.e.f. 18.8.2000 instead of September, 2007 on the analogy of Shri Som Dass son of Shri Parma Nand working in the same Range as that of the petitioner, in view of Annexure P-5 with all consequential benefits including seniority and arrears accruing thereon on this account. CWP No. 3666 of 2010 (i) Directing the respondents to regularize the service of the petitioner w.e.f. the year 1998 as per policy of the State Govt. after his having rendered 8 years of continuous service in the office of respondents No. 1 & 2 and further directions be issued to grant all consequential benefits to the petitioner, while granting him the benefit of regularization from the due date as has been done in the case of Som Dass’s case vide Annexures P-2, P-3 & P-5, who has been extended the benefit of regularization with all consequential benefits from the due date in pursuance to the orders passed by learned erstwhile Tribunal and affirmed by this Hon’ble Court. CWP No. 3677 of 2010 (i) Directing the respondents to regularize the service of the petitioner w.e.f. the year 1998 as per policy of the State Govt. after his having rendered 8 years of continuous service in the office of respondents No. 1 & 2 and further directions be issued to grant all consequential benefits to the petitioner, while granting him the benefit of regularization from the due date as has been done in the case of Som Dass’s case vide Annexures P-2, P-3 & P-5, who has been extended the benefit of regularization with all consequential benefits from the due date in pursuance to the orders passed by learned erstwhile Tribunal and affirmed by this Hon’ble Court.” 2. It is submitted that the matter has been considered by the State Administrative Tribunal and the order of Tribunal was challenged before this court and this court has dismissed the same as can be seen from Annexure P-3 judgment in CWP No. 420 of 2006. It is further submitted that said judgment has been accepted and implemented by the State. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is similarly situated person like the petitioner in the said case. The petitioner has submitted Annexure P-4 to first respondent. There will be a direction to first respondent to look into all the aspects of the matter and take appropriate action in accordance with law and justice without discriminating the petitioner. This will be done within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order alongwith the copy of writ petition. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 2nd July, 2010(K) (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge