IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 4332 of 2009 Date of Decision: 24.8.2009 Sohan Lal ....Petitioner. Versus Pardeep Kumar and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. J.R. Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. In this revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has impugned the order dated 26.5.2009 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Additional District Judge, Ferozepur, whereby the application filed by the petitioner-objector for staying the operation, execution and implementation of impugned judgment and decree dated 11.5.2009 passed by the trial court was dismissed. On a specific query being put to the learned counsel for the petitioner with regard to the material to show that the possession of the suit property was delivered to the petitioner by Mulkh Raj, he could not produce or refer to any material in support thereof. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not point out any C.R. No. 4332 of 2009 -2- illegality or perversity in the impugned order which may warrant interference by this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Dismissed. Nothing observed herein shall be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the controversy between the parties. August 24, 2009 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE