^ ©i¥J^ly w-'..."^.^.^. 'r:s. ^^'^,;"- .<. '^.l^.t-.t. -. ." IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G M.C.C. N0. %%'J..OF 2011 (ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 01/11/2011 PASSED !N M.A. 10 N0. 486/20091 1 2, a Ku. Madhuri Sidar D/o Sudarshan Singh Sidar Aged about 22 years Vikas Kumar S/o Sudarshan Singh Sidar Aged about 19 years Ku. Tanu Sidar Aged about 18 years (earlier a ininor at the time of filing Claim her birth certificate i tsrsseni.sd oy .."""• ''DsaSS-—"""y"^\\^- \ i.S v'i-. 3-pU o annexed) D/o Sudarshan Singh Sidar.^j-^(-&^-Ul* Sscyti'-; P«S;Ta^nha-r jf; "ja-k'Si'i- (^kQ.V^^OctA,Tli-sh''°ct"- R:»y-^^ 0=-^ ^ u .j, %^- Vinod Kuraar Sharina S/o Shri Nandlal Sharma R/o C/o Puja Transport, Gandhiganj, Raigarh (C.G.) Dharamdas Mahant S/o Shanichar Das Mahant, Aged about 40 vears A Driver R/o Dhima-rapur, Ashok Vihar Golonv, Raigarh (C.G.i 3, The United India Insurance Company Limited, through its Branch Manager, Branch Office; Opposite Gopi. Talkies, Raigarh •41 RULE 19 OF CODE OF C'VIL PROGEDURE, 1908 FOR RESTORATION OF MISC. APPEAI._(C1 N0. 486 OF 2009 (KU. MA.DHURI SIDAR & 2 OTHERS VS_VlWjD KUMAR SHARMA 8s 2 OTHERS) .TO ITS ORIGINAL NUM.BER HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLE SHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, J. Applicants Appellants ^^ hfl.C.C.No. 823 of 2011 1. Ku. Madhuri Sidar, d/o Sudarshan Singh_Sidar, aged about 22 years, 2. Vikas Kumar, s/o Sudarshan Singh Sidar, aged about 19 years, 3. Ku. Tanu Sidar aged 18 years, (earlier a minor at the time of filing claim her birth certificate is annexed), d/o Sudarshan Singh Sidar All r/o Village Godhi, P.S. Tamnar, tahsil Gharghoda, distt. Raigarh C.G. VERSUS 1 Vinod Kumar Sharma, s/o Nandlal Sharma, r/o c/o Puja Transport, Gandhiganj, Raigarh, C.G. 2 Dharamdas Mahant, s/o Shanichar Das Mahant, aged about 40 years, a driver, r/o Dhimarapur, Ashok Vjhar Colony, Raigarh C.G. 3 The United India Insurance Compapy Limited, through its Branch Manager, Branch Office, Opposite Gopi Talkies, Raigarh C.G. Ap&lication for restoration of NIA (Cl No. 486 of 2009 Present: Shri Manoj Jaiswal, counsel for the petitioners. ORDER Non-applicants Respondents >th (30InNovember,2011) .C.C.No. 823 of 2011 The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri Manoj Jaiswal, learned counsel for the petitioners is heard on the restoration petition. 2) The petitioners are seeking restoration of M.A.C No.486 of 2009, which came to be dismissed vide order dated 01.11.2011 for want of prosecution. 3) On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners and the grounds taken in the restoration petition, we are satisfied that the absence of the petitioners'/appellants' counsel on 01.11.2011, when M.A.C No.486 of 2009 was taken-up for hearing, was based on bona fide grounds. 4) M.C.C. No. 823 of 2011, therefore, is allowed and M.A.C No.486 of 2009 is restored to its original number. Sd/- Chief Justice subbu Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge