CRM-M No.27646 of 2011(O&M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.27646 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 26.09.2011 Surender and others ...... Petitioners v. State of Haryana and another ...... Respondents *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate & Mr. Ajay Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, A.A.G., Haryana. *** AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in complaint case No.232/2009 dated 12.01.2009 registered under Sections 148, 149, 323, 325, 326 and 506 IPC pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Panipat. Learned counsel for the petitioners has made a contention that even though the learned Additional Sessions Judge has granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners yet the error made is in limiting it till the date of appearance. He has relied upon the judgment in the matter of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra and others reported in 2011 CRM-M No.27646 of 2011(O&M) ::2:: (1) RCR (Criminal) 126, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has laid down that normally the bail granted by the Court is continued till the end of the trial of the case. Learned Assistant Advocate General is not in a position to cite any contrary ruling. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. It is clarified that the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner shall be continued till the end of the trial of the case. ( AJAY TEWARI ) September 26, 2011 JUDGE ashish