IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST MARCH 2010 / 10TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 10107 of 2010(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. AJIMON, PROPRIETOR, VIJAYA BAKERY, BUILDING NO.278, WARD NO.XXVIII, CHANGANACHERRY MUNICIPALITY. 2. SHIJIMON, KARTHIKA NIVAS, K.R.PURAM P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.M.P.MADHAVANKUTTY SRI.GOKUL DAS V.V.H. RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. CHANGANACHERRY MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER(P.W.D.), CHANGANACHERRY, KOTTAYAM. 3. JOSEPH VARGHESE @ BABU, S/O.VARGHESE, KARAKKATTU HOUSE, KURISHUMMOODU, CHANGANACHERRY. ADV. SRI.SIBY MATHEW FOR R1 SRI.PHILIP J.VETTICKATTU FOR R1 SRI.B.PREMNATH (E) FOR R1 GOVT.PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 10107 OF 2010 (K) ===================== Dated this the 31st day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T Inaction on Ext.P1 is what is complained of. 2. According to the petitioners, Ext.P1 complaint has been made to the 1st respondent and that 1st respondent has not so far initiated any action. 3. If as stated by the petitioners, Ext.P1 has been received and is pending, the 1st respondent is directed to take appropriate action in the matter. However, any such action shall only be with notice to the 3rd respondent also and shall be concluded on an expeditious basis. Petitioners may produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the 1st respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp