1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.O. NO.578/2010 IN M.C.A. ST. NO. 7957/2010 IN F.A.No. 207/2005 (National Insurance Company Ltd. VERSUS Shankar Deosharan Mishra & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Shashikant Borkar, counsel for the applicant . Shri K.K. Pillai, counsel for the R-1 to 4. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : JUNE 21, 2010 . Heard. The learned counsel for the respondents strongly opposes the prayer made in the civil application. However, for the reasons stated in the civil application, the prayer made in the civil application is granted. The civil application is allowed and disposed of. M.C.A. ST. NO. 7957/2010. Heard. The learned counsel for the respondents strongly opposes the prayer made in the civil application. However, for the reasons stated in the civil application, the prayer made in the civil application is granted subject to the payment of costs of Rupees Three Hundred in the High Court Bar Library within a period of one week. 2 The miscellaneous civil application is allowed and disposed of. C.A.F. NO. 945/2010. Heard. The learned counsel for the applicant/appellant Insurance Company states that the applicant/appellant Insurance Company is not challenging the order passed by the Tribunal on any grounds other than the ground of improper applicability of the multiplier to the facts of the case. In such circumstances, according to the learned counsel for the applicant/appellant, the filing of paper book would not be necessary. On hearing the learned counsel for the parties, since the appellant-insurance company is restricting the submission only on one issue, the filing of the private paper book would not be necessary. The civil application is allowed and disposed of. JUDGE APTE