IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 4171 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 21st February, 2011. Pawan Kumar Petitioner through Ms. Sonal Datta, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents through Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has received the payment in part and the balance payment is also likely to be received. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action or otherwise, if the need arises. February 21, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE