IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1638 OF 2005 (SS) Bhuwan Chandra Joshi ………….Petitioner. Versus State of Uttaranchal and another. …….Respondents. Present: Mr. Bhagwat Mehra, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Manoj Tiwari, Senior Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Dinesh Gahtori, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/ respondents. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) Heard Mr. Bhagwat Mehra, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Manoj Tiwari, Senior Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Dinesh Gahtori, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Mr. Bhagwat Mehra, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the bar that the writ petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such. In view of the above statement, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 15.2.2011 Kuldeep