^^ >lV' Petitioner Respondents HIGH<50tMrOFGHHAm^ARH:BILASPUR Wr Petittoh (Sl No. 11 af2808 Jamay Bai, Wo. shrt Raphar, /^e about ®iyeare, occupatibn- Sennce gs PsrmanOTt ©angman, R/6. P.W.D. OfSce, Sub Division Inctesaoh, Gariaband, District Raipur (e.G.). Versus 1) State of ChhaU^arh, through te Secretaiy, Department of Publte- Wterles. D.K.S. BHawan, Raipur ^G^; 2) Exanithre ETOineer; PW©Sub Dividon, Gariaband, District Raipuri(CG). 3) Sub DMsional CWicer, PW.D. Suly Divlsion (B & R), GaFiabaBd, DIstrhA Raipur^G). (WritPetitionunderArBele228oftheGonstifaittonoflndia) SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K, /^nlhertri,,(. Pre^nt: SMri Yog^hPandey, counse|forttie})etjflonjer. Smt. SunitaJain.Paneli^wyerfortheState. ^"^ QRM.WS^^ • : • • (Passed on 4"' Jariyaw, 2<X)% Leamed counsel appearing for 1Me pBUUoner as weU as for the respondente/StatejojntlysubmiMhat^<ac^ofthe^)»eseirtwrit?paBB^ are slmilar to ttiat of Writ Petition (S) No. 108/2(M5 (Govind&diwre Vs. StateofC.G.and othera) alongwith otherconnectedmattors,whk;h wasdtsposedofvideorderdaled 4-1-2007 (AnnexureP/4). Theyfuifter submttthatthequestjonoflawmyolvedisalsqthesame. 2) |nviewoftheabQve-statedsubmissiSnS:mSBe-byleamedcounset for the parties, the vmt peUtion is diqsosedof in terms ofttie wder datwt 1 '' . • • : • •••'.'". • • •• •• ' • '. •• 4-1-2007, passed by this Gourt in Writ Pefltion (S) No. WSISXS (Oovtad & others Vs. State <rf G.@. aml c^ers) along witft other eonhastel matters. No order astocosls. / . / Sd/- ^^—', '] SatishK-Agnihotn f '^- Judge ^