e.^-'^^Z_ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAKH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITIONfS)NO. l'^~f- IZO^F WRIT PETITIQN U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PETITIONER ^ ^. ^•^ ww^ ' ^ RESPONDENTS ^^€--' ^^""" y' 2. a.^" ^••^ -Laxminarayan Patel, aged about 41 years, son of Shri Nanhuram Patel, Assistant Teacher,Govermnent Primary School Lendhra, Distt. Raigarh, C.G. (Sl.No.7ofAnnexP-l) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The District Education officer, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) ?t";st)l,.--" PARTICULARS ABOUT THE PETITIONER ^. HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P.(S) No. 117 of 2007 Petitioners : Monsingh Khande and others Versus Respondents ; State of Chhattisgarh and others W. P.fS) No. 118 of 2007 Petitioners : Tejram Bhagnt and others Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt-iS9arh ond others W. P.fSl No. 121 of 2007 Petitioner ; Sanjay Kumar Sinhu Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and ono-ther W. P./S) No. 126 of 2007 Petitioner : Bhuvneshwar Prt»a*dPradhon Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and o-thers W. P.fS) No. 127 of 2007 Petitioner : Kulranjon Ekku Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh and others W. P.fS) No. 128 of 2007 Petitioner : Smt. Bharti Bai Versus Respondents : State of ChhaniS9arh ond another W. P.(S) No. 129 of 2007 Petitioner : Philos Akshoy Mukut Tigga Versus Reqiondents : State of ChhattiS9arh and onother W. P.fSl No. 130 of 2007 Petitioner : Smt. Pnisadi Bhagat Versus Re^)ondents : State of Chhattisgarh ond ano-ther W. P.fSlNo. 131 of 2007 Petitioner : Sogar Sai Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh and o-thers W. P.fS) No. 133 of 2007 Petitioner : Inus Bek Versus Respondents : State of Chhcrttisgarh and arwther W. P.(S) No. 134 of 2007 Petitioner : Baliram Hiogat Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and ano-ther W. P.fSl No. 135 of 2007 Petitioner : Avinash Chandra Xalco Versus Respondents : StateofChhatt-isgarhandothers W. P.fS) No. 136 of 2007 Petitioner : Smt. Shashiknla Bhagat Versus Re^ondents ; State of Chhatl-isgarh and another W. P.(S\ No. 137 of 2007 Petitioner : Chhanduram Bha9at Versus Respondents : Storte of Chhatl-iS9arh ond another W. P.(S) No. 139 of 2007 Petitioner : Ku. Clementina Tig9a Versus Raspondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh and another W. P.(S) No. 145 of 2007 Petitioner : Kridina Ram Patel Versus Respondents : State of ChhattiS9arh ond others W. P.fS)No. 147 of 2007 Petitioner : Laxminaroyon Patel Versus Respondents : State of Chhatfrisgarh ond another W. P.(S) No. 149 of 2007 Petitioner : Smt. AAaxi Miliyoni Toppo Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh ond ono-ther W. P.(S\ No. 150 of 2007 Petitioner : Smt. tojmani Versus Respondents : State of Oihatt-isgarh ond others W. P.(S\ No. 151 of 2007 Petitioner : Chamru ftam Na9deo Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and o'thers W. P.fSl No. 159 of 2007 Petitioner ; &inesh ftam Pradhan Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh and another W. P.(S\ No. 161 of 2007 Petitwner : ChhoteloJ Khonna Versus ftespwidents ; 5tate of Chhattiqarh and another W. P.(S) No. 165 of 2007 Petitioner : Ramkumar Choudhari Versus Respondents : State of Chhafisgarh ond another And W P.fS) No. 168 of 2007 Petitioner : Brijmohan Ncyak Versus Respondents : State of Onhattisgwrh and onother (•^"^•^]??-S|?i SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J Present: Mr. A.N. Bhakta, Advocate for the petitioner(s). AArs. Anju Ahuju, Depu-ty Sovemment Advocate, Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer, Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for Kie respondents/State. OR D E R (Passed on this 17th Day of Jonuary, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for Ihe petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that Ihe facts of the present writ petitions are simikir to Ihat of in W. P. (S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiuwri ond others vs. Stote Sovemment of Chhatl'isgarh & o'thers), which was allowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. They •hir'ther submit Ihat the question of lou«involved is also the same. 2. In vie*»of the above-stated submissions made by leamed counsel for •the parties, these writ petitions are allowed in terms of the order dated 7.11.2006 passed by -this Court in WP. (S.) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil TtNwri and others vs. State fiovemment of Chhattisgarh & olhers). No order as to costs. Subhmh 3. A copy of this order be ploced on record in o-ther connected writ petition. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge