IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD FEBRUARY 2011 / 4TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 5623 of 2011(C) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ A. NAZARUDEEN, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O.ABUZHAMAN PILLAI, RESIDING AT MORAKKATTIL KUNNUMPURATH VEEDU, MUTHUVILA P.O., KALLARA VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT (L.D.C (HIGHER GRADE), DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OFFICE FOR SCHEDULED CASTE, AYYANKALI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH. K.RAJU, SRI.INNOCENT FRANCIS PAPALI. RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-01. 2. THE DIRECTOR SCHEDULED CASTE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AYYANKALI BHAVAN, KANAKA NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 33 3. THE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER FOR SCHEDULED CASTE, KANAKA NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 33 4. THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, SCHEDULED CASTE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKAS BHAVAN, KANAKA NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 33. R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.ANTONY MUKKATH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/02/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No. 5623 of 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 23rd day of February, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a Lower Division Typist who entered service on 17.03.1986 and is still continuing as Lower Division Typist, although many of his juniors have been further promoted. According to the petitioner, this is on account of a mistake in the fixation of seniority and consequent promotions. Detailing the grievances of the petitioner, the petitioner has filed Exhibit P9 representation before the second respondent. The petitioner seeks a direction to the second respondent to consider and pass orders of Exhibit P9 expeditiously. I have heard the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents also. Having heard both sides, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the second respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P9, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and all persons who may be affected by any orders in favour of the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. W.P.(C)No. 5623 of 2011 -2- The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition along with a certified copy of this judgment before the second respondent for compliance. Sd/- S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE KRK