THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD F.C.A. M.P. No. 375 of 2011 and F.C.A. No. 156 of 2009 COMMON ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice N.V. Ramana) This Family Court Appeal is directed against the order and decree dated 16.03.2009 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Hyderabad, dismissing the F.C.O.P. No. 858 of 2006 filed by the appellant-husband, for grant of decree of divorce from the respondent- wife. During the conciliation proceedings conducted by this Court, the parties wanted to end their marital relationship amicably and the respondent-wife agreed to give divorce and withdraw all the cases filed by her against the appellant-husband, subject to the appellant- husband paying Rs.18,00,000/- in full and final settlement of her claim and the minor daughter, towards permanent alimony. Accordingly, both the parties have filed F.C.A.M.P. No. 375 of 2011, which is accompanied by their respective affidavits, setting out the terms of compromise they arrived at and requesting the Court to record the compromise and allow the appeal. However, as the terms of compromise as stated in the F.C.A.M.P. indicate that the amount of Rs.18,00,000/- agreed to be payable by the appellant-husband to the respondent-wife towards full and final settlement of her claims, would be paid in two installments, and as unless and until the total amount is paid, the compromise cannot be recorded, this Court, on 03.08.2011, directed the appellant-husband to bring the demand drafts in the name of the respondent-wife, for the total agreed amount, and adjourned the matter to today. Today, both the parties appeared in person and identified each other and are also identified by their respective counsel. The respondent-wife submitted that she has received the agreed amount of Rs.18,00,000/- from the appellant-husband, by way of two demand drafts. The parties have also filed a memo to that effect, which was signed by both of them and their respective counsel, and the photocopies of the two demand drafts were enclosed thereto. The respondent-wife reported no objection for allowing the appeal in terms of the compromise arrived at between them, as set out in the F.C.A.M.P. No. 375 of 2011. In view of the above, the F.C.A.M.P. No. 375 of 2001 is allowed. Consequently the order under appeal is set aside and the Family Court Appeal is allowed, by and in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties as set out in F.C.A.M.P. No.375 of 2011, which shall form part of the decree. No order as to costs. _____________ N.V. RAMANA, J _________________ P. DURGA PRASAD, J 5th September 2011 IBL