I 7 TEE HEGH COURT OF JU urATURE‘CHHATTlgnARn AT BILA'SPUR U 1? 0. LC 8Q 2504 H hr UH D amra‘kar / TafP T I Tamraizar, ali ‘ Pe‘i‘iHm1 er A I Q m s ‘ ”Gut 4a y "Wars JD ’ . p /.-‘ .n rig—”J n.—« “L I u uux uuwala nuuu uuui’a‘fiaiu. Presen‘tiy pasted as Senior i‘viedicai Qfficer, Community Heaith Centre Dormargai‘h, Dist ‘. Rainaladgaon=(C.G.} km” m State of Chha h m' e Through the Secretajii Heaith & Family Weifare Department ManEalaya Raipur, Dieti Raipur=w.G.) If! The Director Heaith Servieeg Directoraie of Heaith, Raipur Dist z Raipur—(C.G.) The Chief Meciicai 85 Health Offieer, Rajnai’idgaerx ~{C.G.) The Supei‘interxdent U’paJail Dehgargarh, Dist : Rajnwldgacnq l .u.) f3 \ The Sub Divisioruai Magistrate, Doegaegarh, J vDisL : RainaridgaemiCG.) \ Vv’RIT FETETION U7A‘2ze ’ "47 OF THE CONSTIT’ TTON OFI 'DIA 1. ParticuEars of the Petiticner. As per cause true 2‘ Fartieulafe of the Reeeendents. AS eer cause ti‘de. 3. ?arf:iculars of the order against which m“ petition is beimg filed : 2801 1' 2002 22. 1 1 .2002 Additienai Seeretarv He$th anti Welfare Department, Raipur<{C.Gt) Ot’de’r No Order éateci Paesed bV 4. Deiav, if any in filifxg the eetie‘on. There ie rm rielav in iili’m‘g the petition v ' P€1i14cmer )r ‘11 ‘:mmpgg rj ’11 §U§§03 {U iagMg“ A 59: 1v 2‘ "§::‘ mm@ w§M& Wiggimg. “gm?! ‘3‘?» Wmm, Hww‘ "§ ,A cow /’ 1' N- W wf“ awhw Waamm mwa €$.£3.}‘. WRIT PEIYTION UfFiQztj / ‘4 ‘ Paiticmars of the Petitioner. As per cause nhE y... D[\ Parficuiars 0f the Regmhdei‘x As per cau$e mle. P””‘Licu1ars 0f the order again 2801 /2; 22.11.20 AddiTi’oha Departtm w. OJ 4. Deiav, if anv in iiiirlg the vetii ‘ There is 1'16 dela‘v if: filing the / f § IGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR LWM Single Bench: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Ayihotri, J. W. P. No. 1086 of 2004 Petitioner z Dr. A‘K. Tamrakar Versus Respondents : State of Chhath‘sgaxh 8:. others Shri Prafull Bharat, counsel for the peh'tioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Government Advocate for the StateI respondents. ORAL ORDER (21" July, 2006) 1. It is submitted that the petitioner has tiled an Appeal against the impugned order dated 22.11.2002 (Annexuxe P—4) befoxe the Respondent No.1/Sec1eta1y, Government of Chhattisgarh, Health and Family Welfare Department, on 24. 12.2002. 2. It is surpn‘sing that the respondents had taken more than three years to decide the Appeal of the petitioner. Accordingly, the respondent No.1 is directed to consider and decide all the pending appeal of the petitioner as stated above, Within a period of four weeks mm the date of receipt] pmduct'on of a copy of this order. 3. In view of foregoing, the petition stands disposed of. No cider as to costs. ‘ \\ Certined p coPy as Per Rules. Sd/_ Sau'sh 1c 4E .lom ‘ Judge