IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12354 of 2010 AKHILESH KUMAR RAI, SON OF LATE AMBIKA RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DIYAMAN, P.S. KRISHNA BRAHM, DISTRICT BUXAR. ----- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SURENDRA RAI, SON OF HARIHAR RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DIYAMAN, P.S. KRISHNA BRAHM, DISTRICT BUXAR ----- OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 3 1.9.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a wrong submission was made before this Court which influenced the Court and the Court granted anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there was a submission that the lands which were subject matter of the Partition Suit was not the subject matter of the deed which is said to have been fraudulently prepared by the petitioner by impersonating one Shradha Nand Rai. This Court has neither accepted nor disbelieved the statements made on behalf of the petitioner, and granted bail considering the civil nature of the dispute. There is no allegation of misuse of bail which is actually a ground for cancellation of bail. The application for cancellation of bail is thus dismissed. Sanjay ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)