C.R.No.3217 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURTOF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, CHANDIGARH. C.R.No.3217 of 2009 Date of decision: 30.4.2010 United India Insurance Company Ltd. .....Petitioner vs. Parveen Kumar and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG. Present: Mr.Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.N.K.Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Rakesh Kumar Garg,J.(Oral) In this revision petition filed by the petitioner-company the prayer is for quashing the award dated 12.2.2009 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal,Karnal whereby a sum of Rs.7500/- has been granted to respondent No.1 for the injuries caused to him in the alleged motor vehicular accident on 22.2.2004 by the offending vehicle. Keeping in view the meagre amount granted to the respondent, this Court is not inclined to interfere in this petition. However, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the findings of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal with regard to the liability of petitioner to pay the compensation in other connected appeals arising out of the same award which may be pending shall be affected. Thus, it was imperative upon the petitioner to challenge the aforesaid finding regarding accident in question in this petition also. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 has submitted that respondent No.1 has not filed any appeal for enhancement of the compensation in this regard and he has no objection if the present revision C.R.No.3217 of 2009 2 petition is dismissed without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to challenge the aforesaid findings in the other connected appeals. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and without going into the points raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner this revision petition is dismissed with the observations that the dismissal of this revision petition shall not have any effect with regard to the findings of the Tribunal on the question of liability to pay by the petitioner company in the connected appeals. It is made clear that dismissal of this petition will not operate against the petitioner to challenge the findings of the Tribunal in the other connected matter(s), if any, which shall be decided on its own merit. ( Rakesh Kumar Garg) Judge April 30, 2010 rk