IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN Writ Petition No. 25915 of 2008 Between: M/s.Dinesh Transports ,rep.by its Prop.C.S.Ravi Kumar S/o.C.V.Subba Rao R/o.201, Srinivasan Residency, Ameerpet,Hyderabad ... PETITIONER AND 1) The Regional Manager, L&T,Reddy Mix Concrete, Madapur,Hyderabad 2) The Commercial Tax officer, Sri Nagar colony Abids,Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus by declaring the proceedings issued by the 2nd respondent without initiating any action against the 1st respondent by pressurizing the petitioner to pay the amount claimed in their proceedings is illegal, arbitrary, and capricious consequently set aside the proceedings Rc.No. /2006-07 dated 20.5.2008. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.KRISHNA MOHAN SIKHARAM Counsel for Respondent No.1: NONE APPEARED Counsel for Respondent No.2: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX The Court made the following: ORDER: (per Hon’ble the Chief Justice) 1. When this petition was notified for final hearing on 15.6.2009, the learned advocate for the petitioner was absent and, therefore, the hearing was adjourned to 16.6.2009 i.e. today. 2. Even today, when the petition was called out, the learned advocate for the petitioner was not present. 3. In the circumstances, the petition is dismissed for default. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ June 16, 2009 RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J svs ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRK}