HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Petitioner Ka.';;a8Ss3%§ Resoondents .^t^^^y-^.y"^^^;: ^; ^ Writ Petition. No.8549 of 2008 Dinker Rao Waretvar, Aged about 48 years, S/o late ©anpatRao, R/o C/1 Zone-3, Road No.SC, New Adarsh Nagar, Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Versus 1 State of Chhattlsgarh, Through: Secretary, Forest Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 Principal Chief Conservator, Arnya Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 3 Chlef Conservator of Forest, Durg Circte, Durg (C.G.) 4 Divisional For^t Officer, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 5 Superintendent of Police, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 6 Collector, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 7 Shri R.K. Ntehchal, For^t Ranger, Range Office Forest, Uttar Bor Talab Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon 8 Shri A.K. Mishra, Sub DMsional Officer Forest, Durg (C.G.) !<-• ^i"' •f-'--''^'"••''•'-'-"7*."- •?<'.^'! B Ul Writ petltion under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India Present : Shri Uttam Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. Shri WS Murthy, Deputy Advocate General for the State / respondents No.1 to 6. Shri Kshitiz Sharma, counsel for respondent No.7. Shri Avinash Mishra, counsel for respondent No.8. ORDER (16th November, 2009) The fotlowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri Uttam Pandey, leamed counsel for the petitioner, in vlew of the categoric averments made by respondents No.1 to 6 in para8 of their counter affldavit, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition filed by the petitioner styled as 'Public tnterest Litigation' with the liberty of filing another writ petition for the reliefs sought by the petitioner in this writ petition and other ancillary reliefs, if the future developments so warrant. 2) Permission granted. 3) Wrth the above liberty, the writ petttion is dismissed as withdrawn. 4) The securtty amount of Rs.2,000/- deposited by the petitioner be refunded to the petitioner. Sd/- Chief Jusdce Sd/- SunilKumarSinha Judge subbu