IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44588 of 2010 RAKESH KUMAR @ BHIMA, son of Ravindra Prasad Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 24.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Massaurhi P.S. Case No. 233 of 2010 registered under Sections 399 and 402 of the I.P.C. and 25(1-b) A 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Admittedly, only one mobile set has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the persons, from whose possession firearm were recovered, had already been granted bail by the learned court below itself. The impugned order of learned Additional Sessions Judge, VIIth, Patna reveals that he did not even try to distinguish the case of the petitioner from the case of those accused persons who were granted bail by the learned court below itself. Considering the facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties petitioner, namely, Rakesh Kumar @ Bhima is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Massaurhi in connection with above stated Massaurhi P.S. Case No. 233 of 2010. PN (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)