IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19999 of 2010 1. RAM AYODHYA SINGH SON OF LATE RAM RIJHAN SINGH 2. RAM KUNWAR, SON OF RAM AYODHYA SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Even though the allegation in the First Information Report is that the daughter of the informant, who was married in 1999, was done to death by her in-laws in January 2008, but there are documents to suggest that in fact the deceased has died on account of accidental fire in the house, in which transaction even the husband of the deceased and his uncle sustained burn injuries. After the death of the deceased, her death certificate was also granted by the authorities and she was cremated according to Hindu Rites. In view of such, in the event of surrender of the petitioners, named above, who are the father in law and the brother in law of the deceased respectively within four weeks from today in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 33 of 2008 they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) each two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the - 2 - petitioners. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners, (ii) that the petitioners shall undertake to be represented on the first date after cognizance and in case they fail to do so, their bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled, (iii) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on the date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iv) that the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/Fahad ( Anjana Prakash, J. )