1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4948/2004 (Sarojni Vyas vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) Date of Order :: 25.04.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Miss.Pintu Pareekh, for the petitioner. Mr.Shyam Ladrecha, Dy. Govt. Advocate. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was selected for the post of Para Teacher/Shiksha Sahyogi vide resolution No.21 dated 20th May, 2002. Thereafter a selection list dated 23rd May, 2002 (Annexure-P/2) was issued and her name was sent to attend the training for providing appointment. In pursuance of Annexure-P/2, petitioner appeared in the camp and after completion of training, she was relieved vide order dated 08th June, 2002 (Annexure-P/4). Thereafter an application was filed by the petitioner for providing appointment, but no appointment was given to the petitioner. In present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents for providing appointment on the post of Para Teacher upon which he was selected in pursuance of Annexure-P/2. In this case, reply has been filed by the respondents. In the reply it is stated that Senior Dy. Education Officer vide order 2 dated 30th March, 2002 (Annexure-R/1) cancelled the selection of Para Teachers of different Gram Panchayat of the area known as Kela, Rajasar/Karnisar, Khavarbara, Raner, Nadhrana and Kapureesar. Learned Dy. Govt. Advocate submits that in view of the cancellation order dated 30th March, 2002, there is no right accrued in favour of the petitioner to get appointment on the post of Para Teacher in pursuance of so called selection made by the respondents. I have perused the order dated 30th March, 2002 (Annexure-R/1). Upon perusal of the said order, it is revealed that without providing opportunity of hearing and assigning any reason, order of cancellation has been passed. Therefore, this petition is allowed. The order dated 30th March, 2002 (Annexure-R/1) passed by the Senior Dy. Education Officer is quashed. However, respondents are directed to decide the matter afresh after providing opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period of two months from today. No order as to costs. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS),J. A.K. Chouhan/-