IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31666 of 2008 SUSHIL DHARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the petitioner - Mr. Rudal Singh, Adv. For the State – Mr. Akaber Ali, A.P.P. ---------- 2. 14/8/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This is a case under Sections 395, 397 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is neither named in the First Information Report nor has been put on Test Identification Parade. It is submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused. Further submission is that one of co-accused who is on similar footing has been granted bail by a Bench of this Court by an order dated 5.10.2005 passed in Cr. Misc. Case No. 36047 of 2005. It is submitted that the petitioner absconded and was arrested on 5.9.2007 and since then he is in Jail. Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner was shown absconder in the chargesheet and he has been named accused on the basis of confessional statement of another co-accused. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner Sushil Dhari is directed to be released on bail 2 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional District & Sessions Judge, F.T.C. Vth, Sheikhpura, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 924 of 2007 arising out of Barbigha P.S. Case No. 194 of 1998 with the condition that one of the bailors must be wife/father/mother/brother/cousin. S.Ali (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)