^ft XN SHB H2©H C@BKT ©? WBieASQRE AT BI&ftSlPUE (e.©.) WXS EE®TS€»iNQ. r3oB7 ®?20°3 '"? &al SatoB » aged ato®ufe44 yetf's, 8/0 shrl Ban sahu* eeeiipa<al©niferdar ( aB'abari. LeeBfcral SaSLl Battwx, T^tesll uid Matraet lialpur (C@), ireaident of Jail Une» guBEter Ste. X/31 Baipux-, atesl.l and lAstxiet Balpur (es). ^^ 0 ..^^^' ^j^'i^'. <^'^-"». '^ 'T-I; aha_Sfeate.®f,,Abafe*l.sgaBli., ,. : .. \ ' . &i»<agh tI*a.^;§eeEet<|Fy_.B^artm^'k.-et : nie: A<faAr</;,,: Sail aNI sraB!»B©i?t|^;ea,MaB^Ealay, B.twS.B^.l.ding, talpur» Tdiatl aifd sl.atrlG* aalpur (@g). S'he <t>* Bl.<"®®t@rA:©«aBral:®t'tbliee-A'aaspaSteT :: ^ ,ef:-iTa|l.i,a»;..dri»a'fett;B®a»to,:teli>ur»';BBbi3l.l : ; ,j llMlstrte?t •aillpa»;{®S). ' : •• • SiveEtntoBaroft@< 3ail, . - • : ;;: ' - L <ltell» Balpar» Sehsil and BtatrAcst Saiptu?4 ©•i »al 4. abxi JBaJ.^u PBasad ehe^bey* WarttoE/RE'aharA, j Sub ijail, suilana* ©lafcrlefea'agflalpar (iBaataEy (cs). »BBtaSSSE®N ^BSB *in!X€&BS 226/2Z? ®?SHB t W"'Ss W :SBiU."euI.iGi'lB''1at":tKi«"'"BBSt^^BJBt » -HC—78 T^ '^i<ii<yi<i,:yTi1'ylj6, fs|dly^< . . t^.p.jOo.So^. *ll*«ll«>Nitt>" """"""""""" """""""^ 200 3> an^'?! iRqT (1j°Tf3s^lf) W^I-aCTft;TO WIJ 3i1^T S»>*!1* VL' '^ff^R ^ff^cT SflT^T 30/01/2004 SItri S.K. Thomas, coimsel Dr. N.K. Shukla, Additioiial 1 to 3/State. By ftiis petition ffled under India fhe petitioner bas (Amicxurc P/1) by which hc has Raipur to Sub-Jail Sukma, D»tric Petitioner was working as a was aUowed twice to lespondents been ffled. clianei|tged or on fhe ground pf mutual traas^ In this case, the procedurc| 208 of fhe JaU Maaual, has not| Additional Advocate General fairy already been movcd fot canceBajtion ^*^<?T41t 'RTO^ff Tf fe%t ^R^R ^? afRiH sn^r ^or fhe petitioner. ^dvocate General for respondents no. ^rtlcle 226/227 ofthe Constitution of (tic order dated 10/09/2003 Ibccn transfiaTcd fipm. Ccntral Jail, t Bastar. (Vatder at Centeal JaU, Raipur. Tinie |to file the retura, but retum bas nofe Leamed counsel for the peti^ioner subinits that ia view ofthe sub Rule (2) of Rule 208 of fhe Jafl Msjnual, a Warder caiuiot toe transferred feoin one circle to another circle itnle iiless showiag special cucumstaaces ;r with fhe conscrit ofthe Wanlers. as enwisaged in sub-rule (2) of Rule been foBowed and Dr. N.K.Shltkla, subinittEd tliat the Gbvcnunent Uas ISJL^ of transfer looldng to thc y^Ws TT It^ ^•'::l:iiii' 1 1 f' XI-HG—78 isn^i 'SI Rwi* W an^T rttii'ti x ^.'llvh '3^T •<11'41C1'4, Qtll'M'IS, FEtcll''Hy< *tt*lc'(Ta»*ii<R •^,200 31I^T'q^i'('<pf35|^r) TOnwHteiai^fi _ o provisions pf sub-rule (2) ofl^ufe 208 ofJailMaaualaudthatisunder consideBaliion. Having lieard leamcd tD tfae facts and circumstaacels {»uaselfor ttie parttes and liaviug regard of fhe case, I aia oftUe dpuuon that it fe a flt casc in wlucli the petitic(ner sfaould be allowedto make a detailed repTesentatibiK ^to the aUowcd to niakc a dctaacd Respo|ndCBt iajn raism^ aU his gncvanccs witl^ BespSadentssIiaU. deeiide the reasoned orderwitfain perio4 representa.ti.on in the light of aad considenug atl fhe point^ With'i'thfi direction Consequentl)?, M.W.P.NQ.282^ Parties are entifled for (} *i<ii<?i<ftt 'PPRT? "^ f^^ <r<it^i< ^aTRnaii^T no.2. Tberefiire, ttsc petttioner is repicscntatioii to fhc Rcspondent no,2. ^D. a pcriodof 10 days fixun today aad fUc al 1 i:"-:^ ^ame iri aa objective inatuier by passui.gitt^l ofone inonfh fiuin fhe date pf receipt; c^f^ iub-rule (2)ofRule208oftheJailMamj]^Jlj|f raised by fhe petitioner. J i|resaid, fhe writ peti.tion is disposed oft|^| p/2003 also stands disposedof. jcrtified copy of this order. l:i^ a&ilresaid, Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge J X il' !1 ] 1 11