1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.9481 OF 2010 Vithal Jaddu Ghodke Petitioner Versus Sadashiv Bhimrao Ghodke and others Respondents Mr.Dhananjay Mane, advocate holding for Mr.Milind Patil, advocate for petitioner. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 20 th October, 2010. P.C.: 1 The application tendered by petitioner seeking amendment to the plaint has been turned down by the trial Court in view of the order passed on 21.07.2010. 2 The reason for rejection of the application, recorded in the order, is that apart from the fact that proposed amendment would change nature of the suit, the application is also presented at belated stage. Plaintiff presented application seeking amendment to the plaint after completion of recording of evidence of parties and further in his application, there are no reasons 2 mentioned as to what are the circumstances those prevented him from tendering the application before framing of issues. 3 On perusal of the order passed by the trial Court, it does not appear that the trial Court has committed any error in rejecting the prayer made by the plaintiff. In exercise of powers conferred on this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution, no interference is called for. 4 Writ Petition, therefore, stands rejected. (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE ******* adb/wp948110