IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.41772 OF 2009 PERMANAND SAO, SON OF LATE HARGOVIND SAO, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA JAMUNICHAK, P.S. BARH, DISTRICT PATNA VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 04.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The case is under Sections 379, 411, 413 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The case is of theft of electric wire. Petitioner is said to be a labourer. From the order of the learned court below it appears that during investigation petitioner was paid Rs.500/- as labour charge per trip for carrying electric wire. It is submitted that main kingpin of the gang, who organized this crime of theft of electric wire, is one Ghanghan Yadav. Petitioner is in judicial custody since 04.02.2009.From the order of the learned Sessions Judge it appears that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the above facts and circumstances and particularly the fact that this is a first offence of the petitioner, the application is allowed. Let petitioner (Permanand 2 Sao) be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.K. Chaudhary, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Biharsharif in connection with Bind P.S. Case No.13 of 2009 with conditions as laid down in sub-section (3) of Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as may be applicable and also that one of the bailors shall be a close relation of the petitioner. In case of breach of any of the conditions at any stage to the satisfaction of the concerned court below, it shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner and take steps for his arrest. B.T (J. N. Singh, J.)