S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2458/2006 Smt. Purnima Singh vs. Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture & Technology, Udaipur Date of order : March 16, 2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Harish Purohit, for the petitioner. Mr.G.R.Punia, for the respondents. By the instant writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order Annexure-4 dt. 20.4.2006. Learned counsel for the parties submit that by order Annexure-R/1 dt. 5.5.2006, operation of the order Annexure-4 has been kept in abeyance and, therefore, the instant writ petition has become infructuous. However, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to file a fresh writ petition if any fresh adverse order is passed. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as having become infructuous. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh writ petition if any fresh cause of action arises. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-