IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.900 of 2011 MD. MUMTAZ @ BABLU Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 11.01.11. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. This is an application for bail in a case of misuse. Initially, the case was registered under Sections 399 and 402 of the I.P.C. when the petitioner was granted bail. The bail bond of the petitioner was cancelled on 16.06.2005. Now the petitioner is in custody since 17.09.2010. It is submitted that since the petitioner was outside the State to earn his livelihood that is why he could not appear but now the petitioner undertakes to appear on day to day basis. Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Samastipur, in connection with S. Tr. No. 44 of 1991 arising out of Rail P.S. Samastipur 0072 of 1990. The learned court below is at liberty to 2 cancel the bail of the petitioner if the petitioner fails to appear on three consecutive dates during trial. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)