THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR W.P.No.17068 of 2003 Dt.7.9.2009 Between: Smt.Chinthala Padmavathi … Petitioner And The Deputy Executive Engineer (R&B) Special Sub Division, APGHC Ashoka Road, New Delhi and others … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR W.P.No.17068 of 2003 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Eswaraiah) The writ petition is filed seeking writ of mandamus to declare the action of the respondents for not absorbing the petitioner in the 1st respondent office on par with other candidates as Typist in clear vacancy as per G.O.Ms.No.212, dated 22.4.1994, as illegal and arbitrary. Admittedly, the petitioner was appointed on 10.4.1992 through private agency on contract basis at New Delhi. The case of the respondents is that there was no clear vacancy and the appointment of the petitioner was only on contract basis through private agency on 10.4.1992 and therefore she is not entitled for regularization as per terms and conditions laid down in G.O.Ms.No.212, dated 22.4.1994. The petitioner has approached the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in O.A.(SR).No.8276 of 2003 seeking regularization of her services in terms of G.O.Ms.No.212, dated 22.4.1994. The said O.A. was returned by order, dated 17.7.2003 on the ground that she was not engaged by the Department and she was only engaged on contract basis through private agency. The said order has not been questioned by the petitioner and she filed writ of mandamus seeking direction for absorption as Typist as per G.O.Ms.No.212, dated 22.4.1994. Admittedly, the petitioner has not fulfilled the criteria laid down in G.O.Ms.No.212, dated 22.4.1994 to consider her case for regularization. Therefore, the petitioner is not entitled for any relief in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. _________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. _______________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J. 7.9.2009 kpr