IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.621 of 2010 MD. SHAKIL Versus HEMANT KUMAR SAHU ----------- 4. 22.7.2010. The office has raised objection regarding the maintainability of this Civil Revision on the ground that there had been final adjudication in this matter deciding the rights of the parties and the suit had been dismissed. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that in view of the law laid down in Brahmdeo Prasad Vs. Baldeo Prasad and others, reported in 1998(3) PLJR 486, he does not want to contest the stamp report, however, it is submitted that in view of the office notes, the appeal would only lie before this Court. Therefore, it has been submitted that the petitioner may be allowed to convert this Civil Revision into an appropriate appeal. Permission is accorded. The petitioner is permitted to convert this Civil Revision into an appropriate appeal within two weeks, failing which this Civil Revision shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)