1 mss S3089 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 3089 OF 2009 VATSAL HIRENKUMAR SHAH & ANR. .. PLAINTIFFS Vs. GIRISH VRAJLAL SHETH & ORS .. DEFENDANTS Mr. Vatsal Shah, Plaintiff No. 1 & P.O.A. Holder of Plaintiff No. 2. Mr. P. Y. Shankar for D-3,4 CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED: 21/12/2011 P.C. The Consent Terms between the plaintiffs and the heirs and legal representatives of defendant Nos. 3 and 4 are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. 1. This consent terms settle a private dispute and I am satisfied that the constituted attorney having full authority to represent the plaintiffs and defendant Nos. 3 and 4, have not contravened any provisions of law nor are the terms drawn by them and reduced into writing, contravene the public policy. 2 mss S3089 2. In such circumstances, the suit is accordingly disposed of. Refund of court fees as per rules. 3. No order as to costs. 4. In view of the disposal of the suit, Notice of Motion No. 4333 of 2009 and Chamber Summons No. 1681 of 2010 do not survive and disposed of accordingly. (S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)