IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24093 of 2010 PANKAJ KUMAR DAS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 06.08.2010. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner who is husband is in custody since 29.11.2009 in a case under sections 304B, 201,120B of the I.P.C. on the allegation that he and his family members killed and disposed of dead body secretly the daughter of complainant on 13.8.2009, said to be married on 11.2.2007 on non-fulfillment of demand of Rs.50,000/- for establishing a Factory in Delhi. The petitioner submits that allegations against him are false as the complaint was lodged after two months of occurrence without cogent explanation only for grabbing money. Several witnesses have stated that the deceased was in family way, so she was in regular treatment and on the fateful day she fell down and died on account of injury in her internal part and funeral was also attended by complainant and others. It is also submitted that prosecution side never made accusation of ill treatment against the accused side. Petitioner further submits that ingredients of the instant occurrence do not attract section 304B as in the FIR itself the alleged demand is for establishing for Factory and not as a dowry. The complainant and State oppose the prayer for bail and submit that on account of threat, the prosecution side did not file 2 any case regarding ill treatment meted out to the deceased and further killed her for Rs.50,000/-. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for bail of the petitioner as above is refused with observation to renew the prayer for bail after nine months in Chowk Police Station Case No. 156 of 2009. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)