1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17912 of 2009 GANESH THAKUR, son of Shekhar Thakur, resident of Village Gangari, P.S. Baruraj, District Muzaffarpur. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, District Muzaffarpur. 3. Joint Director, Consolidation Office in the town and Distt. of Muzaffarpur. 4. Block Development Officer, Saraiya, Distt. Muzaffarpur. 5. Circle Officer, Saraiya, Distt. Muzaffarpur. 6. Consolidation Officer, Bochahan, Distt. Muzaffarpur. 7. Accountant General, Patna,Bihar. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 21.12.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as also the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is that on account of non-sanction of the Assured Career Progression (ACP), he is not receiving the correct and entire amount of pensionary benefits. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State submits that the grievances of the petitioner shall be considered as per law without delay. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the grievances as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a detailed representation before the District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur (respondent no.2). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of the claims distinctly as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, 2 respondent no.2 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation and dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner as raised in the representation could be settled without further delay. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)