HON’BLE SRI G.S. SINGHVI, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTSICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD W.P. NO.2046 OF 2006 Between: A. Varada Rajulu … Petitioner And The Commissioner, Dept. of Endowments, Baggulakunta, Hyderabad and three others … Respondents :: ORDER :: Counsel for the petitioner : Sri P.R. Prasad Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3 : Government Pleader for Endowments Counsel for respondent No.4 : Sri V. Venugopala Rao 13th FEBRUARY, 2006 Per G.S. Singhvi, CJ Learned counsel for the petitioner says that his client may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to the association, viz., Sri Lakshmi Chennakesava Swamy Devasthanam Development Committee to institute a writ petition questioning the appointment of respondent No.4. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the association to file petition questioning the appointment of respondent No.4. It is however made clear that the association shall be entitled to seek intervention only after it makes a representation to the Commissioner, Endowments questioning the appointment of respondent No.4 on legally permissible grounds and such representation is not attended to by the concerned authority within a reasonable period i.e. 2 to 3 months. G.S. SINGHVI, CJ Date: 13-02-2006 G. BHAVANI PRASAD, J Svv/ksn