IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19375 of 2010 1. SARJOO MAHATO 2. Shardanand Prasad 3. Lal Babu Prasad Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 29.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Allegation is doubted on the ground that case is lodged after death of the complainant’s husband. Demand was continuing since husband was alive who was opposing the demand but some mistake is committed that when complainant’s husband fell ill some money was demanded by this complainant for treatment of her husband but that was not given which goes to show that complainant was independently responsible for her family’s liability that is further supported by running of shop from her parents’ capital. The matter, as submitted, appears for family property. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 1538 of 2009, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of J.M., Ist Class, Gaya subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)