IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.950 of 2011 Arjun Pandey, S/o Late Lalo Pandey, R.O. Village Samai, P.O. Khalsa Dhibri, P.S. Nawada, Town District Nawada, Secretary, Managing Committee Pandit Lakhan Sanskrit Prathmik Sah Madhya Vidalaya Samai District Nawada………………………….Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Chairman, Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna. 4. The Secretary, Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna…………………………………………………………….…Respondents ----------- 2 09.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the respondents. Admittedly, the Institution has not applied afresh for grant of recognition. Therefore, rightly the Institution was not approved and its name was not recommended to the Government for the purpose along with several institutions which were recommended by Annexure-7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Institution will submit requisite fees and forms with the Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board for start of process for grant of recognition to the Institution. 2 Let it be so done. If the said fees and forms are submitted with the Board, the Board will initiate the process for consideration of the case of the Institution for recognition in accordance with law in the next phase of the process. With the above observation and direction, the writ application is disposed of. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)