IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27547 of 2010 BECHAN YADAV, SON OF LATE BECHALAL YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.20572 of 2010 SANTOSH MEHTA @ BOUA MEHTA, SON OF LATE BALRAM MEHTA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the eye witness account came one year after the occurrence and before that only speculation has been raised against the petitioners, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. IInd, Supaul, in Sessions Trial No. 187 of 2010 arising out of Birpur P.S. Case No. 105 of 2008 (Cr. Misc. 27547 of 2010) and Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Birpur, in Birpur P.S. Case No. 105 of 2008 (Cr. Misc. 20572 of 2010) subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners and the other shall be the father/brother of the petitioners. The bailor will 2 undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioners. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)