THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 20355 of 2009 Oral order: The petitioner states that even though the impugned notice dated 17.09.2009, issued by the respondents under Section 452 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 provides ten days time to submit explanation, but the respondents have provided only three days time, and even before the petitioner submitting his explanation thereto, the respondents are taking steps to demolish the alleged illegal constructions. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, and both of them agreed for disposal of the writ petition with the following directions: The petitioner is directed to submit his explanation to the impugned notice within a period of ten days from today. Thereupon, the respondents shall consider the same and pass appropriate speaking orders, explaining the deviations, if any. Till such exercise is undertaken, the respondents are directed not to demolish the constructions. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 22.09.2009 Note: Issue wire at party’s cost. (B/o) KSR