IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 1054 of 2004 (M/B) 1. Smt. Shashi Verma W/o Ram Avtar Verma 2. Km. Rashmi D/o Ram Avtar Verma, All R/o 767/4, Maseeha Gang, Siphti Bazar, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh. ……….. Petitioners Versus State of Uttaranchal & others. ……….. Respondents Mr. M.C. Bansal, learned counsel on behalf of the petitioners. Mr. A. Rab, learned Addl. Government Advocate for the State. Hon. V.S. Sirpurkar, C.J. Hon. Irshad Hussain, J. 1. Heard Mr. M.C. Bansal, learned counsel on behalf of the petitioners and learned Addl. Government Advocate for the State. 2. The learned public prosecutor makes a statement that the Investigating Agency does not propose to arrest the petitioners. However, it is clarified that if the Investigating Agency decides to arrest the petitioners, then 8 days’ prior notice shall be given to them. 3. With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. (Irshad Hussain, J.) (V.S. Sirpurkar, C.J.) 27.10.2004 27.10.2004 G