1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 43 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 43 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 43 OF 2008 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.1182 OF 1997 WRIT PETITION NO.1182 OF 1997 WRIT PETITION NO.1182 OF 1997 Ananda R. Karkera. .. Petitioner. vs. Air India Limited (formerly Air India Corporation) .. Respondent. Mr. A.D. Shetty with Ms. Rita Joshi i/by Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for Petitioner. Mr. Abhay Kulkarni i/by Chhaya Shah for Respondent No. 1. CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE: 23RD MARCH, 2009. DATE: 23RD MARCH, 2009. DATE: 23RD MARCH, 2009. P.C. . Heard. 2. The hearing of the petition is expedited and, therefore, the petition be placed in the weekly list of hearing of the writ petition. In so far as the other 2 reliefs sought by the petitioner i.e. prayer clauses (a) and (b) of the notice of motion are concerned, it is only after the petition is disposed of after hearing on merits that the petitioner can claim entitlement for such reliefs which cannot be granted by way of interim relief pending the hearing and final disposal of the writ petition. Therefore, prayer clauses (a) and (b) of the notice of motion are rejected. The notice of motion stands disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (V.K. Tahilramani, J.) (V.K. Tahilramani, J.) (V.K. Tahilramani, J.)