^!!S6a*%. //^ "' 1C—78 ^^ Hl^n? ^rW^ '3^( ';ZF?^FPT, "g^PT^, fcfCll-H^ »^....M£^l&:...^ll^ 1200 2> ^I^F ^?^ (^^^) sn^r^T^N? 'ci^? 3?H^T W?N? i=rfrd PETITIONER Dr. Gopal Pr, Say, aged Veterinary Hospital, Aw; Versus RESPONDENTS 1. State o ^Rta^ft^ 'wi^f ^* f^^ ^N^R ^^^f a^r Secretary, (Veterinar^) Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CC^) 2. Deputy Distt. Dan E|irector, Veterinary Seryices, |:ewada (CG) SB: HON. SHRI DHIRENDRA MtSHRA, J 27-01-2009 Shri Atul Pandey, counsel sad Chandrakar, S/o Shri Ram tbout 38 years, Occupation- ^xtension Officer, Veterinary palli, District Dantewada (CG) Chhattisgarh, through: Department of Agriculture WRIT PETITION UNDEtR ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITJUTION OF INDIA br the petitioner, Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Goj/t. Advocate for the State. Heard. Grievance of the petitioner| Extension Officer posted at ^ Dantewada was transferred to ^j Annexure P-1, so far as it relatj effect to. |is that, the petitioner, who is Veterinary ^eterinary Hospital Awapalli, District- ^eterinar}^ Hospital, Dhamtari vide order of Annexure P-1 dated 30th Juijie 2008, however, the transfer order of ^s to the petitioner, has not been given .^% ^, ^I-HC—78 'T^ ^WW^, ?Stii«^<o,I^TRT^T NIH<'II %»N8G|» "^200^^ 3?li^T ^f^ ( ^i^^) ^[f^?'^[ 1^'iNr TW W^ S»»4!<^>" \ ^mw ^n ^T^ -?- ^(^?<iq}t "STR^ff ^* fe^f <F^^!< ^-stRmw^r ^ Learned counsel for the p< not pressing this petition at thi make fresh representation for b( in compliance of the transfe] respondent No.2, who, in turn, representation within a specified On the other hand, learr^ submits that if the petitioner fil^ in compliance of the transfe^ respondent No. 2, the same sl respondent No.2 within a periodj the representation. In view of the above submi the instant petition is disposed representation for being relievejd Veterinary Hospital Dhamtari of this order. On such No.2 shall decide the same withi receipt of representation, in accc|] ^titioner, submits that the petitioner is [^ stage, however he may be allowed to ^ing relieved from Awapalli to Dhamtari order of Annexure P-1 before the jmay be further directed to decided the jperiod. |ed counsel for the respondents -State s fresh representation for being relieved order of Annexure P-1 before the lall be considered and decided by the Jof four weeks from the date of receipt of before ission of learned counsel for the parties, |of with liberty to petitioner to file fresh from Veterinary Hospital Awapalli to the respondent No.2 along with copy repres^ntation being received, the respondent |n a period of four weeks from the date of jrdance with law. Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge •»%<-^y':-i*fcn;.;<^!*iii^'s».,y.-?a(>36i(tie•<»»-;••*-;;?".•«