IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.27209 of 2010 KISHUN DAS son of Late Ganesh Das Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 27.07.2010 In view of the office note, filing of the certified copy of the impugned order is dispensed with. Now, the case is taken up for admission. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. It has been submitted that by order dated 5.11.2009 vide Cr. Misc. No. 38145of 2009, considering the merits of the case the petitioner was granted bail also on the condition that an affidavit would be filed on his behalf that he has no antecedent. However, since there was one other case pending against the petitioner, such an affidavit could not be filed. Fresh bail application has been filed stating that he is accused in one other case. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-cum- Fast Track Court No. V, Jamui, in connection with S. T. No. 137 of 2010, subject to the conditions (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the mother of the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the bailors shall also - 2 - state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)