,///A 1 »y V" J\{0)I é\ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. Wr petition K67 Q . /2002, gB'rITggNERu M/m DURG RAODWAYS PVT..LTD. , THROUGH g Director, Naali‘ G¢E.Road’ EURG (c..G.) VERS US 1v”, STATE: OF Cz-LHATTISGARH THROUGH g The Secretary” Department on? Transport, D.K»Bhawan, RAIPUR (C.G.,) ¢., Addl¢RgTqo.Rajnandgaon( C¢G.) RESPONDENTS a 3» Station House Officer, Po lice Station, Lalbag, RAJNANDGAON ( c; G. ) \, @IT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22.6 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIAa it ws“ ég HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 187 of 2002 PETITIONER : M/s. Durg Roadways Pvt. Ltd. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: None for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 03’ day of December, 2010) 1. The matter is called for hearing.'None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. 2. In View of the above, the matter is dismissed fdr want of prosecution. Consequently, interim relief granted earlier is discharged. / \ Sd/- Satish K. Agm'hotri‘;"" Judge Amit