IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 17TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 1524 of 2008(F) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ K. SUGATHAN, S/O. DAMODARAN, KALLINKALKUDIYIL HOUSE, EAST KALOOR POST, KUMARAMANGALAM VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.KURUVILLA JACOB RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE TAHSILDAR, THODUPUZHA. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KUMARAMANGALAM, THODUPUZHA. ADDL.R3. T.P.SASIDHARAN NAIR, ADVOCATE, S/O. PADMANABHAN NAIR, THAYYIL HOUSE, KUMARAMANGALAM P.O., KUMARAMANGALAM VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK. (IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DT.6.2.08 ON IA 1365/08) BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI I.V.PRAMOD. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) 1524 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated: February 6, 2008 JUDGMENT This writ petition discloses a dispute regarding the boundary of 20 cents of property purchased by the petitioner from the additional 3rd respondent. In view of the dispute, petitioner submits that, Ext.P6 application was made before the 1st respondent for fixing the boundaries. It is complaining of the inordinate delay on the part of the 1st respondent in processing the said application, that this writ petition has been filed. 2. Having regard to the fact that the petitioner has filed Ext.P6, I dispose of this writ petition directing that if action has not been taken on Ext.P6, the 1st respondent shall take necessary action thereon. However, before any order is passed on Ext.P6, the 2nd respondent shall give notice to the additional 3rd respondent or any other person who is likely to be affected by such decision. Final order on Ext.P6 shall be passed as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE WP(C) 1524/08 Page numbers mt/-