c^. fe@i@ I@r^ IN THE^IIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT CHHATTISGARH FIRST APPEAL N0. _ _/?2'___ OF 2006 APPELLANT: [Defendant) RESPONDENTS: /[Plaintiff) ^^" ..-"".^' ^^ y Subodh Bagrecha, son of Shri Inderchand Bagrecha, aged about 42 years, by profession- Architect, Bal Ashram Parisar, Kutchery Chowk, Raipur. vs ^ ^Bal Ashram, a registered society through its Secre.tary/ Officer In-charge, Bal Ashram Parisar, Kutchery Chowk, Raipur. Civil suit valued at Rs.59,4757- Court fee affixed Rs.6,600^ This appeal valued at Rs. 59,475/- Court fee affixed Rs.6,600/- APPEAL UNDER SECTION 96 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE,1908 ^ -HG—78 3TI^T ^T f<^i<4i ^^ ^TI^T 5b^iob *11*«f(l 5b*ff^» "S^ ^ww^, y>tii'M<i<o, f®ldl'ylj,< C. P^ (M5. [o'^/ ^5^<2> 200 ^^ ^'?T T^RT ( ^?^<^T) ^TTW^f^T CTiST SB: HON. SHRI JUSTICEl 13-4-2010 Shri B.P. Shanna, A|( Shn Pawan Shrivas^ava, On instniction, Sh^i has already been hand^d Ashram and fhus fhis ap] Shri Pawan Shriva(stava respondent does not disp^ite Inview ofabove, fh^ infi-uctubus. No order as to costst cnNf<n^li 'RT^ff ^ ^S <Fai<^i< ^3^R3TT^r N.K. AGARWAL ^lv., for the appellant Adv. for respondent. [i Sharma submits fhat possession over to the respondent / Bal >eal has become infi"uctuous. stava, appearing on behalf of the the above fact. appeal is dismissed as has become Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge