IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S) No. '^ %^\^ OF2011 (S.B.l. PETITIONER 'tH^^-f^f' .^i^^' ^^\y^'' ^•y^ ^•' .^tu y^--"" ^*" RESPONDENTS layatu Ram Jurri, S/o. Shri Khirmit Ram Jurri, aged about 57 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Chandeli, Block Charama, District Kanker (C. G.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, . D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Kanker, Distt. Kanker (C. G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Charama, Distt. Kanker (C. G.) 4. Treasury Officer, Treasury Account and Pension, Kanker, Distt. Kanker (C. G.) ^ ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^^-..cg /y\\ alj f fe^^g^ 1 j, viSS3lss*f g ''ia.Ji^f .•^ ^ le.Bench: Hon'ble Shri Manindra_MQhan,Shrivastava, J. Aayatu Ram Jurri State of Chhattisgarh and others WT PETITION ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSiTUTION OF Shri Somkant Verma, Shri Vinay Pandey, Pane i! for the petltioner. Lawyer for the State. on 27th June, 2011} The petitioner was initlally appointed as Deputy Teacher on a fixed pay of Rs.100/'-. After completion of his probation period, he was granted reguiar pay scaie ofRs. 169-300/-. 2 . Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submitted that the issue involved in the c-ase is as to whether fhe petitioner is entitled to regular pay scaie with effect from the date of initial appointment or after completion of probation period. 3. The issue invoived herein v/as considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunai, Jabaipur in O.A.No.2745/88 Ysdii sn'i 5S Others v. ofM.P. & others), wherein it was held that the similariy sltuated .teachers are entitied to regular pay scale with effect from the date of initig! appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The ^appeai was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court uphoiding the decision of 1 BT "t ,^ .—z r'smane th®Tribuna! to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entit'ed to reguiar pay scale from the date of inltia! appointment. 4. Learned counsei appearing for the petitloner further submits that this Court, vhiie considering {he same issue in Amar Sai & Others v. of & Others, W.P.(S).No.4725/2006. by order dated 01-09-2006, aliowed the petiSioners to make a representation within a period of ten days, II K raising aii tne gnevances. 5. Accordingiy, the petitioner is granted iibeily to make a representation raising all grievances in iight of the aforestated judgment and order dated 27-12-2008 (Annexure P-6) and in turn, the concerned respondent is directed to decide the representation, if any, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation, subject to verification of the facts. 6. In view ofthe foregoing, Shis petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge