- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1267 OF 1993 And WRIT PETITION NO.1240 OF 1993 WP No.1267 of 1993 WP No.1267 of 1993 WP No.1267 of 1993 Ramrakh R.Bohra & Ors. .. Petitioners Vs. Securities & Exchange Board of India & Ors. .. Respondents -- Shri Jaideep Raut i/b M/s.Crawford Bayley & Co.for the petitioners. Shri D.M.Vyas i/b M/s.Maneksha & Sethna for the respondent No.1. Shri Sagar Divekar i/b Wadia Ghandy & Co. for respondent No.5. -- WP No.1240 of 1993 WP No.1240 of 1993 WP No.1240 of 1993 Shrenik K.Jhaveri & Ors. .. Petitioners Vs. Securities & Exchange Board of India & Ors. .. Respondents -- Shri Sushama Satpute i/b M/s.M & M Legal Venture for the petitioners. Shri D.M.Vyas i/b M/s.Maneksha & Sethna for the respondent No.1. Shri Sagar Divekar i/b M/s.Wadia Ghandy & Co.for the respondent No.5. -- CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & V.M.KANADE, JJ. - 2 - DATED : 29th AUGUST, 2005. P.C. . Heard. The learned Advocates for the parties state that the issue involved in the matters has been covered by the decision of the Apex Court in B.S.E.Brokers’ Forum, Bombay & Ors. v. Securities B.S.E.Brokers’ Forum, Bombay & Ors. v. Securities B.S.E.Brokers’ Forum, Bombay & Ors. v. Securities and Exchange Board of India & Ors., and Exchange Board of India & Ors., and Exchange Board of India & Ors., reported in (2001)3 SCC 482. Accordingly, in view of the said decision, nothing survives in the present petitions. Hence, both the petitions are accordingly disposed of. Rule in both the petitions stands discharged with no order as to costs. Interim reliefs, if any, stand vacated. (R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J) ( V.M.KANADE, J)