IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3337 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.3337 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.3337 OF 2005 Ramu Govind Shinde. ... Applicant. Versus. Vilas Maruti Jadhav and others. ... Respondents. Shri Dilip Bodake for the Applicant. Shri V.V.Purwant i/by Shri R.S.Kate for the Respondent No.1 to 7. Ms.Rajashree M.Gadhvi, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. : ABHAY S. OKA, J. : ABHAY S. OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 10th August, 2005. : 10th August, 2005. : 10th August, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Shri Bodke for the Applicant and Shri Purwant for the contesting Respondent. 2. At the outset Shri Purwant, the learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents Nos.1 to 7, pointed out that the case has been fixed in the trial Court on 10th, 11th and 12th August 2005 on day-to-day basis for recording of the evidence. The statement is accepted. 3. The bail has been granted in favour of the contesting Respondent by order dated 27th December 2004. Assuming that the allegations which are made in the application are true, if the evidence is to be recorded on three consecutive dates as stated by the learned Counsel appearing for the contesting Respondent, it is : 2 : 2 : 2 : not necessary to entertain this Application. Accordingly the Application is rejected. Judge. Judge. Judge.