IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Original Contempt Petition No.1503 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION : DECEMBER 15, 2010 SURINDER SINGH SIDHU ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS SHRI C. ROUL & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Harinder Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. BS Chahal, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that because the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed, the petitioner does not want to pursue the contempt proceedings. I am of the opinion that the necessary relief has been given to the petitioner and, therefore, no further orders need be passed in the contempt petition. Disposed of. December 15, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?