IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 2862 of 2010 Sukhwinder Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents Present: Mr. Anurag Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG, Haryana for the State. RANJIT SINGH J. Counsel for the petitioner would be at liberty to pursue his request for transfer by showing that the policy instructions relied upon by him are still in existence. As per Mr. Rathee, this policy was not a continuous policy and was framed only once in the year 2007. Otherwise also, prima face the policy would not operate in the manner as suggested by the counsel for the petitioner. I am thus not inclined to interfere in the writ petition. Dismissed. August 30, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE