IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14103 of 2010 Deepak Kumar, Son of Shri Arun Kumar Pachauri, resident of Village & P.O. Bara Auraiya, P.S. Adapur, District East Champaran. –Petitioner. VERSUS 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, East Champaran. 4. The District Education Officer, East Champaran. 5. The District Superintendent of Education, East Champaran. 6. The Block Development Officer, Adapur, East Champaran. 7. The Block Education Officer, Adapur, East Champaran. 8. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Auraiya, Adapur, East Champaran. 9. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Auraiya, Adapur, East Champaran. 10. The Head Mistress, Government Primary School, Lala Chapra Adapur, East Champaran. 11. The Chairman, School Education Committee, Government Primary School, Lala Chapra, Adapur, East Champaran. 12. Shri Ashok Kumar Choudhary, Son of Shri Suresh Choudhary, resident of Village Lala Chapra, P.O. Auraiya, P.S. Adapur, District East Champaran. -Respondents. ----------- 02 06.09.2010 The petitioner was working as Panchayat Teacher. On 11.12.2009 he has been dismissed. He has filed this writ application challenging the order of dismissal being on non est grounds. In my view, in terms of Rule-18 of the Bihar Primary Panchayat Teachers (Recruitment and Service Conditions) Rules, 2006 the petitioner has equally, efficacious and alternative remedy to the Appellate Tribunal constituted under Rule-18. That being there, I am not inclined to entertain this application. The petitioner should first exhaust remedy under Rule-18. Upon appeal being filed before the Appellate Tribunal, the Tribunal would endeavour to dispose of the same within the statutory period fixed. The petitioner may seek such other remedy as he may be advised by the Tribunal who deal with it in - 2 - accordance with law. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. Trivedi/ (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)