@és) IN THE HIGH COURT OF .CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.(S)No. w5b2— 0F2011. PETITIONER Jaitram Navratna, S/o. Shri Shiv Lal Navratna, aged about 52 years, Head Master, Govt. Middle School Chhote—mudpar, Block Kharsiya, District Raigarh, (C. G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS /: 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) / 2. The Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 3. Basant Kumar Bhardwaj, Head Master, Govt. Middle School Chhote-mudpar, Block Kharsiya, District Raigarh, (C. G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 4532 of2011 E5?) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. I’resent: Shn' Somkant Velma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent N0. I & 2. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 11 ‘ day of August, 201 1) I. By ‘ihjs petition. the petitioner seeks to challenge the legality and validity ofthe order dated 15.07.2011 (Annexure P/l), whereby, the petitioner, working as Head Master at Middle School, Chhote Mudpar, i Block Kharsiya, has been transferred to Lailunga. on the option ofthe Block Education Oii'icer, on administrative grounds. 2. At the very outset, Bhaduri, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/respondent No. 1 and 2 submits that by memo dated 05.08.201 I, all the transfer orders of Head Masters, which have been declared as Class Il post, have been cancelled. Thus, nothing remains for adjudication. 3. In view of foregoing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that nothing survives for adjudication in this matter. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed%///:/' PETITIONER : Jaitmm Navratna. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others.