IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37135 of 2009 1. YUGAL RAI S/O MAGAN RAI VILL.- LODIPUR, P.S.- GORSAL, DISTT.- VAISHALI 2. VIJAY RAI S/O YUGAL RAI VILL.- LODIPUR, P.S.- GORSAL, DISTT.- VAISHALI 3. ANIL RAI S/O YUGAL RAI VILL.- LODIPUR, P.S.- GORSAL, DISTT.- VAISHALI 4. SURESH RAI S/O LATE RAM ASHRAY RAI VILL.- BONDHA, P.S.- GORSAL, DISTT.- VAISHALI------------Petitioners. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR ------------ 3. 30.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Sringari Devi is so called kidnapped but voluntarily appeared and made her statement under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure also involving these petitioners and according to the learned counsel for the petitioners believing that refusal of anticipatory bail cannot be justified as several cases were pending in between both the families concerning land. If really she was kidnapped there should be some motive but neither there was any demand for payment of ransom nor any harm was caused to her. Witnesses are there as well as observation of the investigating authority is there about foul play of the victim itself entitling petitioners for anticipatory bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of communication of this order the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Goraul P.S. case no.52 of 2008 , subject to the - 2 - conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J. )