IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 22ND NOVEMBER 2011 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 29957 of 2011(T) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- CHERIAN JOHN C, AGED 62 YEARS, S/O.CHERIAN, CHAIRMAN, ST.GREGARIOUS MEMORIAL ST.JOHN'S EDUCATIONAL AND SOCIAL TRUST, PRAKKANAM, PATHANAMTHITTA - 689 653. BY ADV. SRI.V.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS P.O., KOTTAYAM - 686 560 REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS P.O., KOTTAYAM - 686 560 3. DR.FATHIMA (SYNDICATE MEMBER) MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS P.O., KOTTAYAM - 686 560 (PRINCIPAL, M.E.S.COLLEGE, ALWAYE). 4. SRI.MOHAMMED SHERIEF, CHAIRMAN, MUSALIAR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MALAYALAPUZHA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.PIN-689 653 R1 & R2 BY ADV.SRI.T.A.SHAJI,SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.29957/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P-1 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE MEMBER SECRETARY OF ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION, NEW DELHI. DATED 01/9/2011 EXT.P-2 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.DATED 17/12/2009. EXT.P-3 TRUE COPIES OF THE CHALAN. DATED 01/10/2011 EXT.P3(a) TRUE COPIES OF THE CHALAN. DATED 01/10/2011. EXT.P3(b) TRUE COPIES OF THE CHALAN. DATED 14/12/2010. EXT.P-4 TRUE COPIES OF THE CHALAN. DATED 29/09/2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 29957 of 2011 T ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 22nd day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Petitioner has established St.John's College, Pathanamthitta, which is approved by the AICTE. The College was also affiliated to the respondent University. Petitioner applied for affiliation of courses viz., M.Com and BBA. It is stated that subject experts and the Syndicate member have conducted an inspection. The third respondent was also a member of the team. The third respondent did not submit her inspection report, as a result of which, the petitioner's application for affiliation was kept pending by the University. It is in these circumstances, the writ petition has been filed. 2. When the case came up for orders, this Court directed the Standing Counsel for the University to get instructions as to whether report of inspection has been submitted by the third respondent. Accordingly, it is now W.P.(C) No.29957/2011 : 2 : submitted that the report has been received. Now that the report of the third respondent also has been received, it is up to the University to consider the application made by the petitioner for affiliation. This, the University shall do, at any rate, within four weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment and appropriate orders in the matter shall be passed. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/22/11 // True Copy // P.A. To Judge