C? I279” SWQ‘LE EEWH BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAR‘H‘ AT B_ILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NOM$3>§ OF 2010 ggIJMOHAN RAM, S/O Shri Parmeshwar Ram, aged about 58 years, Working in the post Of Tracer, in the Office of P.M.G,SIY., 2 Project Implementation Unit No., Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS PETITIONER RESPONDENTS K“ . 1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Water Resources Department, Raipur (C.G.) 2/Engineer in Chief; Water esources Department, Sihava Bwan / Raipur (C.G.). 3. Chief Engineer, Heo Kachr, Water Resources epartment, Bilaspur(C.G .) 4. Executive Engineer and member , Project No.2, Implementation ‘ Unit Ambikapur , Distt. Surguja (C.G.) secretary,_ P.M.G.S.Y., WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1] ] PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER:— 1 As given above in the cause title of the petition. R ha asd a D WW,WW,W 200 mm(m) mama-#65 WWW mm fs‘itm %si1‘mlan%¥r 97.08 2010 Shri Ashok Swarnkar, coun Smt, Smita Ghai, RL. for the, be served 1f the peutlorz r 1s permxtt to respondent NOS ventilatmg his that some direction may be issu deciding the said representation. On the other hand, State c has no right whatsoever over the the cfore the petmon xs hable to be Be that 51$ 1t may, in t e eventuality of making aziy representation by the petitioner to he respondent No.3, it would be decided in accordance with iaw. It is made clear that ibis C for the Detitioner. ats. 'its that ends of justice Woui - d to make a fresh representation grievance, He however, submits d to the resecmcient sel submits that. the petitioner post which he is hoiding and smissed. has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the autho ity concerned wouki be at liberty accordance with iaw. te‘petition stands disposed of. to decide the representation strictiy With the above observation, tf N03 for s t O t m i ' n o