IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10279 of 2007 SANGEETA KUMARI @ KUMARI SANGEETA Sinha, w/o Shri Garib Das, resident of village- Khawachandra Tola, P. O.- Kiranpur, P. S. Medini Chauki, District- Lakhisarai…. Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the District Magistrate Lakhisarai. 2. The District Magistrate, Lakhisarai. 3. The District Welfare Officer, Lakhisarai. 4. Child Development Project Officer, Surajgraha, Lakhisarai. 5. The Mukhia, Khawa Gram Panchayat, P. S. Surajgraha, District Lakhisarai. … Respondents ----------- 3. 03.12.2009. Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. The prayer of the petitioner in this writ application reads as follows:- “1. That this is a writ petition on behalf of the petitioner for issuance of a writ of certiorari and mandamus or writs in the nature thereof or any other appropriate writ(s)/order(s)/direction(s) for quashing the part of the order dated 27.4.2007 of the District Magistrate Lakhisarai, passed in Misc. Case No. 1/06-07 whereby and whereunder the learned District Magistrate directed the CDPO, Surajgraha and Mukhiya or Khawa Gram Panchayat to start selection for Anganbari Sevika afresh, and for commanding the respondents to appoint the petitioner on the post of Anganwari Sevika who has been selected by the Aam Sabha on 2 19.12.2003 for community building, Khawachandra Tola Anganbari Centre situated within P. S. Surajgraha, District Lakhisarai.” With reference to the aforementioned reliefs, counsel for the petitioner would submit that during the pendency of this writ application certain selection and appointment have been made which would in fact amount to sitting over the order of the Collector of the District inasmuch as the appointment of same person has been made whose earlier appointment had been cancelled by the impugned order. In the opinion of this court, for this part of grievance, the petitioner instead of waiting before this court has efficacious alternative remedy as provided by the State Government in the circular wherein the Collector of the District has been made the Prescribed Authority to look into any sort of anomaly in the selection/appointment of Anganwari Sevika. That being so, counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this 3 application in order to move the Collector of the District by filing a compact representation. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with the above liberty. In the event, the petitioner would file such a representation, the same would be disposed of by speaking order after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, concerned Anganwari Sevika who had been appointed as also the representative of Gram Panchayat by the Collector of the District within a period of six months from the date of filing of such representation. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)