.<^-1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, (C.G.l Vi.P-Vo—^—'-<—.—.t2W6 BBTmONER: -^t*' ..••,•'•,.^\ ^^ ..••" 'MS^' ;.A''/Y)>'" ^..».-- >:sS>' t^ Smt. Manjula Mehta, W/o Shri Sunil Kumar Mehta, Aged about 42 yearS, Occupation-Leeturer, Posted at Model Higher Secondary School Dondi, District-Durg (C.G.) R/o G-7, Model Higher Secondary School Catnpus, Dondi, District Durg(C.G) ittESSPQNDENTS: VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Department of Schedule Caste and Scheduled Tribe Develdpment, Mantralaya D. K. S.Bhawan, Raipur(C;G.) 2. The Cominissioner Tribal Welfare Departrpent, Goyf. of Chhattisgarh, near Pt. Ravi shankar University Premises, Raipur (C.G.) 3. ThePrincipal ModelHigher Secondary School, Dondi, District- Durg (C.G.) UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF CTIiiIA FOR ISSUANCB OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND leEite'tlOR^RI AND FOR^THER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS:- ^'G<^.. -€^ XI-HC-78 tTWcTT ai»TT<sb 'S^ '^W\v\i\, ^ww, fSfdioy **•*•»***•»•»»*'»* »-*•<»-•* * ?F[ 200 3TI^?T4^* (*icttA'!"<,6r) sn^r^rR-ii* (W^n^Ts.htfiiti "^ .,'., Rosharrf- y^ ^^ ^ WcITWflf^tfSn^T hbs 20.7.NSS Heard Shri Jitendra Pali, Miss Deepali Pandey, P.L By this petiticn the p^ttionef 19.11.2005 (Annexure P-1) whereb)/ order dated 2.6.2006 (Annexure P-1|2) whi and also the order dated 21.3.200^ permitted to perform her duties. It directed to pay the full salary for the ] As far as the quashment concerned, that has atready been re|ii'oked and as the petitioner's suspension been transferred to Middle Scho<|)t, quashment of order dated 2.6.2006 i|yher61 As far as the payment of full ^alary is concerned, for whiGh the order d^ted rias in which it has been mentioned.tha the petitioner fbr the period of- 1 do not find any illegality in thi^&ltie^. As far as the quashmert concemed, jn view cS order datett reinstated in services and posted at automaticalty stands overruled and herduties in pursuance of order dat^d In view of the above, the Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.: <tii<ild41-i tiiicil ifte^t<Riw;i< ^arl^iTsn^T Ad^i|ocate for the petitioner. fo|r the State on achrance copy. has prayed for quashment of the order dated the petitioner was placed urder ajspension; -1|2) whereby she has been reinstated in services (Annacure P-10) whereby she has not been been further prayed that the respondents be Iperiod of suspension to the petitloner. |3t prder dated 19.11.2005 (Annexure P-1) is by order dated 2.6.2006 (Annexure P-12) been revoked by the said order and she has Nagj^ frierefore, there is no question of 106 ^hergl^ the petitioner has been reinstated. to the petitioner for the suspension perioct 2.6.2006 (Annexure P-12) is self-contained the department shall decide the entitlement of 3|TSion after completlon of the enqulry. Therefore, jefr. <|>f orcler dated 21.3.2006 ((Annexure P-10) is 2.6.2006 \»tiereby the pettttoner has been (Wicfclle School, Nagri, ttie ofder dated 21.3^006 r|ow the petitioner is at liberty to join and perform 2.6.2006 (Annexure P-12). petifion stands disposed of. ^ 4767/06 also stands disposed of. ' Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge P.T.O.