IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE. AT - BILASPUR C.G. WRITPETITIONNos5&3 /200€ PETITIONER ^ ^^" u> K. P. Dwjvedi s/oLate Hiramani Dwivedi Aged - 48 Years Ppsted as -Sub Engineer ^^.- ^&®v RESPONDENTS Vpy^-'t-a " / .^. .ff AT -Sub-Division-Kota, Division -Pendra DISTT. -Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Throygh - The Secretary, Public Wprks Department, D. K. S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR.GG 2. Superintendent Engineer, Public Works Department,[NHC(rcle] Distt,-Bilaspur[CG] 3. Executiye Engineer, f^>"v^vc^ .„ -——---•»••- *^> » ^C^ - sA^ PublieWorksDepartment, \ ^f" v^-" Pendra-Division,Distt.-Bilaspyr,GG WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE - 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUtlON OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATUftE OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION. SUITABLE DIR^CTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS ETC. XI-HC-78 3Ti^r?irf^TN> cTSTT3T[^Tsh^|ch !<& *11+1MI SbW^i 3^'^rm^pT, ®Tfl<i'is,[cidiy^< .^.ff. ...'3.(^.^: 34 TR; 200^ 3T(^?T4aw ((lcli^sl<^!ET) SRnwHfStrsn^T 20-7-2006:- Shri Ravish Verma, counsel Miss Dipaii Pandey, Pan^ advance copy. Heard both the counsel. Annexlire By the instant petition, th. order dated 7'" July 2006, Jashpur. The petitioner under 2006 was a'tocated to ihe Bilaspu impugned order he has been p0st| The petitioner has not bs^ impugned ordar is outeome of ma| Learned counsel for the p< already made a representation to| ailment but the same has not be| ^ petitioner has challenged his posting (jre-P/1, whereby he has been posted at the Government order dated 30 June be directed to decide the same t has no objection. Having heard !earned cou facts and cireumstances of the d tillFi-l'fl-l WRTf ff tg^S {KlW( ^srRiiTsn^T for the petitioner. Lawyer for the State/'respondents, jr Sub Division, and thereafter, under the tfed aS Jashpur. i^n able to attege and establish that the ma|afide or against the statutory ruies. ;4titioner submitted that the petitioner has the effect that his wife is suffering from sn decided, therefore, fhe petitioner rnay be ailowed to make a detailed r^presentation to respondent No.2 and he which iearned counsei for respondents oursseii! for the parties, having regard to the |ase and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the ^rayer made by learned counsel for the P.T.O. XI-HC-78 3^''qrai?T!r, ®TnM'i6,R'ai*iy *11*1MI Sb+ll^l WT 200 35 Sli^l Maw (l^tg^^T) sn^T^TR-fi* cma.n^Tstiiiict) - ^ Barve t4 -<. ^ <y ^ ?RiTgi:flf?(i3ti^r .~S—\ petitioner is just, fair and reasona|b to make a detailed representatioti respondent No.2 raising al! his gri| Soday and in turn, respondent Not petitioner within a psriod of 301 representation, in an objective n|s raised by the petitioner, in accordah. Wlth the direction aforssaidl Consequently,|\4.(W.)P. Nc| Parties ars entitied for certifl the petition stands disposed of. 1.2779/2006 a!so stands dispossd of. ledcopyofthisorder. °ni^fcl<fl-l HWV}\ tf fe^- <R|(^|<. ^srf^iTgn^r >!e. Therefore, the petitioner is allowsd aiong with a copy of this petition to ^vances within a period of 10 days from [2 shall decide the representation of the days from the date of receipt of the |anner, after consldering all the points ice with iaw. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge P.T.O.