IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA FA No.525 of 1984 1. SHRI GANGA SAGAR PRASAD, SON OF SHRI BANSHI PRASAD 2. SANJAI KUMAR @ SAMJAI KUMAR, MINOR SON 3. BABLU @ NEPALI, MINOR SON 4. PRINCE @ RAJ KUMAR, MINOR SON 5. GINNI, MINOR DAUGHTER 6. BABY @ GONU, MINOR SON OF RAM SAGAR PD. @ GANGA SAGAR PD. ALL THE MINORS APPELLANT NOS. 2 TO 6 ARE UNDER THE GUARDIANSHIP OF APPELLANT NO. 1 SHRI GANGA SAGAR PRASAD, FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, ALL RESIDENTS OF MOHALLA, ALLABUXPUR, P.S. ALAMGANJ, DISTRICT PATNA DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. Versus 2. SHRI SANTOSH KUMAR MINOR SON OF SACHIDANAND PRASAD, HUSBAND OF SMT. SARSWATI DEVI, UNDER THE GUARDIANSHIP OF SHRI SACHIDA NAND PRASAD FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN- RESIDENT OF MOHALLA VIDYADHAR(BABUGANJ) P.S. KHAGARIA, DISTRICT MONGHYR AT PRESENT MOHALLA ALLABUXPUR, P.S. ALAMGANJ, P.O. GULZARBAGH, DISTRICT PATNA-----PLAINTIFF. 3. SMT. MALTI DEVI, WIFE OF DEO SHARAN SINGH, RESIDENT OF ALLABUXPUR, P.S. ALAMGANJ, P.O. GULZARBAGH, DISTRICT PATNA 4. SMT. UMA DEVI, WIFE OF PARMANAND PRASAD, RESIDENT OF STATION ROAD, P.S. KOTWALI, DISTRICT PATNA--------DEFENDANTS—RESPONDENTS. ----------- 35. 10.04.2009. Having heard counsel for the appellants, respondent no.2 as also respondent no.4, this appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties, namely, the appellants and respondent no. 2, which is evidenced as per the terms contained in Interlocutory Application No. 4885 of 2008. Let decree be drawn in terms of the contents of the Interlocutory Application and the Interlocutory Application should also form part of the decree. Before parting with this order it is observed that respondent no.3, Malti Devi, who is purchaser during the pendency of the suit, is not a signatory to the compromise petition, in the circumstances, the order disposing of the appeal in terms of the compromise shall not bind her. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J) - 2 -