THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 2871 OF 2008 O R D E R: This writ petition is ﬁled, alleging that the respondents are not permitting the petitioner to attend the duties as Security Guard, with eﬀect from 25.11.2007. The petitioner contends that he was initially appointed as Casual Labour on 9.1.1975, and thereafter as Coal Cutter on 7.7.1982, and promoted as Shot Firer on 5.8.1992. On ﬁnding that the petitioner was not medically ﬁt to be continued as Short Firer, the respondents appointed him accordingly, as Security Guard Grade-F, on 6.1.1996, and thereafter in Grade-E on 1.2.2005. It is stated that the petitioner was subjected to medical examination on 24.11.2007, and from next date onwards, he was prevented from attending the duties. Respondents ﬁled a counter aﬃdavit, denying the allegation of the petitioner. There is no dispute, as to the service particulars of the petitioner. It is stated that on 24.11.2007, he was referred to the Area Hospital at Kothagudem, and ever since then, the petitioner absconded from duty. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties at length, and on a perusal of the record, this court expressed its view on 29.7.2008, that there was no justiﬁcation for the respondents, in not permitting the petitioner to attend the duties. It was also pointed out that the respondents would be under obligation to pay the salaries from 25.11.2007, onwards. Today, the learned Standing Counsel has placed before this court, a copy of the order dated 31.7.2008, whereunder a sum of Rs.83,241/-, representing the salary for the period from 25.11.2007 onwards, was remitted to the bank account of the petitioner. It was also pointed out that the petitioner can report to duty. With this, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. The writ petition is, accordingly, closed. It is however, made clear that the petitioner shall be under obligation to undergo medical test, that may be prescribed by the respondents. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________ 5th August 2008 PAN