AB 1892/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. MERUNO Heard Mr. A. M. Bora, learned counsel for the petitioners and also Mr. B.S. Sinh a, learned Addl. P.P., Assam. Hearing the submissions of both the learned counsel and upon perusal of the stat ements recorded in the case diary as narrated by the learned Addl. P.P., which t his Court presumes to be the true version of the case diary, it appears to be en ough incriminating materials so far collected by the Investigating Agency to ind icate the involvement of the petitioners in the alleged case and considering thi s aspect of the matter, this Court is of the considered view that the liberty of pre-arrest bail cannot be extended to the two petitioners. In this view of the matter, this bail application stands rejected.