jpc wp8135-11.sxw 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 8135 OF 2011 Roopesh Sagarmal Jain ... Petitioner Versus The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ... Respondent Mrs. Geeta Shastri i/by M/s Khilnani & Co. for the petitioner None for the respondents CORAM: R. M. SAVANT, J. DATED : 21st November, 2011 P.C. : 1. In view of the subsequent event that the application for regularization filed by the petitioner has been rejected and an application made by the petitioner for amendment to the plaint to that effect was rejected by the impugned order, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the petition as well as the suit in question to file a comprehensive suit, seeking relief also in respect of the regularization 2. The said L.C. Suit No. 954 of 2006 as well as the above Petition are allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file a comprehensive suit. jpc wp8135-11.sxw 2 The issue of limitation etc. has not been dealt with and if the issue so arises, it would be for the trial Court to deal with the said issue. 3. Learned Counsel Mr. Shahtri states that the mezzanine floor in respect of which Notice under section 351 of the BMC Act was given is still intact and exists at site. If that be so, accepting the said statement, the parties are directed to maintain status quo for a period of 4 weeks so as to facilitate filing of the said new suit by the plaintiff. (R. M. SAVANT, J.)