C^w^3 [IGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, C.G. WMT PETITIONNO. '3^C>-6 /20Q3" • article 226^27' 3hri Dinfear Tiwari, aged about 46 yeais, S/o lAe Shri Ramakant Tiwari, at present working as a Forest. Guard. Khodri range, Ision Marvahi, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) -^•^^^ VERSUS )ENTS : 1) StateofChhattisgarhthiou^itheSeCTetary Forest and Ci.iltural Departnient, D-K. Bhawaai /^ ^^c, Rapm (C.G.) •^S^s^" 2) Chief Conservalor of Forest, CMuttisgarh State ^••^&s^" T^r^ r'^A.--"" A^s' Raipur, Distt-Rapur (C.G.) ..-- ^'^.fft'°^ffy^ •&"• '_\ sv. /'y ~ ^ifcsMW^»... '' 3) Conservator ofForest, Bilaspur Circle, Bilaspm (C.G:) 4) Divisional Forest Offlcer, Marwahi Dhqsion Marwahi Tahsil Pendra Road, Distt.. Btlaspur 5) Divisional Forest Officer. Kawardha, Kawarda Division, Distt. Kawardha(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 22^2fOF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE AWRITOF CERTIORARI. ORDERS AND DIRECTONS ETC. Parlaculars of the (•?-c.nl^Q'^ ^^^^s^-/-? As stated in flie cause tifle above. i^tasput Petitioner of the res; ** As slated in fhe canse title above. HIGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BILASPUR Wnt Ptetition No. 3606 of 2003 Petitioner Shri Dinkar Tiroari Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & ofhers Sia^le Bench ; Hon'bte Mr. Justice Satls'h K. Agnihotri. Shri Vishnu Kosfha, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Panel lawyer for fhe respondents. ORAL ORDER ( 22nd Febmaiy, 2006) The foUowing order of fhe Court was passed by Satisli K. Agnihotri, J. 1. Leanued counsel for the petitioner, on uistructioa, subinits that ftie petitioner wants to withdraw fhis petition, to which tearaed cozinsel for the respondents has no objection. 2. In view offhe above, thc petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Satish K. Aguihotri Judge Thakur