1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLAE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Writ Petition No. 1391 of 2007 Dnyanoba s/o Hari Gaikwad Petitioner V E R S U S The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents Mr. P.D. Bachate, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. N.H. Borade, AGP for the respondent / State Mr. S.T. Shelke, Advocate for respondent No.2 Mr. C.R. Bharaswadkar, Advocate for respondent No.3 CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATED : 25th March, 2010 PER COURT : The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the writ petition. The present writ petition has almost served its purpose after the petitioner secured interim protection from this Court. He not only contested the election, but he is also declared elected. The other connected questions can be raised in a different writ petition or can be agitated before the Court which is now dealing with the election petition which was filed against the petitioner’s election. In view of this, writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. The liberty is given, as mentioned above. ( A.V. NIRGUDE, J. ) SRM/ 2