IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16206 of 2010 RANJIT MAHTO, S/o Brahamdeo Mahto. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 17.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B) A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Considering that for recovery of two cartridges the petitioner has remained in custody since 10.01.2008 and undertakes to be present during trial where only the informant and the Investigating Officer are left to be examined, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with three sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya in connection with S.Tr. No. 286 of 2009/714 of 2008 arising out of Kotwali P.S. Case No. 5 of 2008 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related 2 with the petitioner, other bailor shall be the father of the petitioner and the third bailor shall be local since the petitioner belongs to Sheikhpura. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)