IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44811 of 2009 1. RAJESH KUMAR JHA @ RAJU JEE JHA 2. Rajeev Kumar Jha Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 25.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that parties are full brothers making their respective claims by different means on ancestral property for having more share for which Partition Suit is also pending and only to make pressure, this case is lodged. Even then petitioners are apprehending their arrest which is not justified. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 333 of 2009, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Saharsa subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)