HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P. No. 3691 of 2010 DATED: 19.02.2010 Between: Munganuri Subbarayudu .. Petitioner And 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer 2. The Tahsildar .. Respondents O R D E R:- The petitioner asserts that he purchased lands in an extent of Ac.4.00 cents in Sy.No.232/2 and Ac.1.52 cents in Sy.No.210, situated in Thottambedu village and Mandal, Chittoor District, in a public auction conducted by the Principal Subordinate Court, Tirupati on 06.07.1987, and he was issued Sale Certificate by the Subordinate Judge, Srikalahasti in execution proceedings in O.E.P. No.4 of 1986 in O.S. No.67 of 1981, and on 29.04.1988, possession of the property was delivered to him by Amin of the Court, and since then the petitioner has been in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the same. While so, the petitioner states that he made several representations requesting the 2nd respondent to issue pattedar passbooks and title deeds in respect of the lands in question, but no action on the representations was taken. Then, he filed a writ petition in W.P. No. 3979 of 2008, and this Court, by order dated 29.02.2008, disposed of the writ petition directing the petitioner to make a fresh representation and the 2nd respondent shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law. In pursuance of the orders passed by this Court, the petitioner made representation, dated 03.10.2009 requesting the 2nd respondent to issue pattedar passbooks and title deeds in his favour in respect of the lands in question. Now, the petitioner’s grievance is that in spite of the representation made by him, the 2nd respondent has not considered and passed any orders thereon. Hence, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking appropriate directions. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents and perused the material placed on record. Inasmuch as the representation dated 03.10.2009 said to have been made by the petitioner, is pending consideration before the 2nd respondent, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, is inclined to dispose of the writ petition with the following directions: “The respondents are directed to consider the representation dated 03.10.2009 said to have been made by the petitioner, and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law, after conducting a detailed enquiry and issuing notices to all the interested parties, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.” With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of . No orders as to costs. ______________ C.V. RAMULU, J 19th February, 2010 Note: Furnish copy in a week. B/o bcj