IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD. (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER, TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO.23270 OF 2006 B e t w e e n: Smt. Venkata Lakshmi. - - - Petitioner. A n d The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Khairatabad and two others. - - - Respondents. Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in taking steps to allot the pattas to others in Survey No.65 situated at Bandlaguda Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District including land admeasuring 60 square yards in Plot NO.3 pertaining to the petitioner and consequently direct the respondents not to deprive the house site of 60 square yards to the petitioner. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.T.P. ACHARYA. Counsel for the Respondents : MR. The court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO.23270 OF 2006 O R D E R: The writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner seeking Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in taking steps to allot the pattas to others in Survey No.65 situated at Bandlaguda Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District including the land admeasuring 60 square yards in Plot No.3 pertaining to the petitioner granted as per patta dated 31-03-1999 in No.D/2753/1999 and consequently direct the respondents not to deprive the house site of 60 square yards to the petitioner. The case of the petitioner is that she belongs to a poor family and she was allotted Plot No.3 admeasuring 60 square yards in Survey No.65 in Bandlaguda Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District along with 22 others vide patta bearing No.D/2753/1999 (P-1) dated 31-03-1999 but due to the nature of the land assigned to them, none resided there at that time but, the petitioner lived there for some time and as the nature of the land is not good and no facilities are there to reside, she left that place. Therefore, she made a representation to the authorities on 28-11-2006 for alternative allotment of plot pending the writ petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the patta that was granted in favour of the petitioner is still in force but she was not in possession and enjoyment of the same, therefore, the petitioner made a representation on 28-11-2006 to the respondents and the same is pending. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that irrespective of the fact that a representation has been made by the petitioner on 28-11-2006, it is sufficient now to direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner pending the writ petition. No counter has been filed by the respondents. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ petition is disposed of without going into the merits of the case and the respondents are directed to dispose of the representation dated 28-11-2006 as early as possible within a period of two months from the date of receipt a copy of this order. No order as to costs. __________________ G. CHANDRAIAH, J. DATE: 13-10-2009. Dsh/Dvs.