IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 19TH JULY 2010 / 28TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 22429 of 2010(C) ------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ M/S. BLUELABS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD., INFOPARK THRISSUR, 'GULMOHAR', NALUKETTU ROAD, KORATTY, THRISSUR, REP. BY ITS M.D., MATHEWS JOSE. BY ADVS. MR V..B.HARI NARAYANAN MRS.M.J.RAJASREE MRS.RUBY P.PAULOSE RESPONDENT(S): ------------------ 1. INFOPARK, (FULLY OWNED BY GOVT. OF KERALA), THAPASYA, KUSUMAGIRI P.O., KAKKANAD, KOCHI-682 030, REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682 030. ADV. MR.P.A.AHAMED, SC, INFOPARKS FOR R1 MR.THOUFEEK AHAMED FOR R1 MR. G.S. RAGHUNATH MR. P. NARAYANAN – GOVERNMENT PLEADER. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.22429 OF 2010 ------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T As per a memorandum of understanding between the petitioner and the first respondent, certain buildings were allotted to the petitioner for running a business on payment of the amounts due as per the memorandum of understanding. Due to a crisis in the business of the petitioner, the amount payable is in arrears which comes to Rs.27,60,689/-. For non-payment, the first respondent is taking steps to evict the petitioner from the premises in question. The petitioner seeks a direction to the first respondent to give three months' time to pay the arrears. 2. I have heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the first respondent also. The learned Standing counsel on instructions submits that two cheques issued by the petitioner in payment of the amount due have been dishonoured and as such the first respondent is not in a position to agree to give further time to pay the amount. Having heard both sides, I dispose of this writ petition with W.P.(c)No.22429/10 2 a direction to the first respondent to give the petitioner two more months' time from today to pay the amount. If the petitioner does not pay the amount within the said two months, it would be open to the first respondent to take further steps in the matter in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of as above. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE acd W.P.(c)No.22429/10 3