1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT 1276 OF 2003 Nu-Tech Corporate Services ----- Plaintiff Ltd. Vs. Ashok Organic Industries Ltd. ----- Defendants Ms. Gayatri Sharma i/by S.K. Srivastav & Co. for plaintiff. None for defendants. CORAM : V.M. Kanade, J. Date : 18th February, 2010 P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiff. None appears for defendants though served. The plaintiff has filed affidavit of service. The plaintiff has also filed affidavit in lieu of evidence and compilation of original documents. The plaintiff had given equipment which is more particularly described in Exhibit `A’ to the plaint. The defendants were to pay lease rental amount to the plaintiff as provided with the Annexures of the deed. The said amount has not been paid by the defendants to the plaintiff and the present suit has been filed by the plaintiff for recovery of lease rental amount and mesne profit and also for recovery of the said equipment, which is described in Exhibit `A . No written statement ’ 2 has been filed by the defendants and hence the averments made in the plaint are not controverted by the defendants. After having perusal of the plaint and the original documents which are tendered by the plaintiff, plaintiff has proved its case. The suit is filed within limitation, in view of the averments made in paragraph 16 of the plaint. The suit of the plaintiff is therefore decreed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c). Refund of Court fees as per rule. (V.M. Kanade, J.)