IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 6426 OF 2006. PETITION NO. 6426 OF 2006. PETITION NO. 6426 OF 2006. Shri Raghunath Sopan Jaagdale. ... Petitioner. V/s. Divisional Traffic Superintendent and another. ... Respondents. Yogendra M. Pendse for the petitioner. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 27th September 2006. DATED: 27th September 2006. DATED: 27th September 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. . Perused petition. . Considering the concurrent findings recorded by the Courts below, no case is made out to interfere with the impugned order. Petition is liable to be dismissed. . Needless to mention that all rival contentions on merit with respect to order of punishment are kept open. . With the aforesaid observation, petition is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)