IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3871 of 2006 KEDAR NATH SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 28.01.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The claim in this writ application is for promotion. Notwithstanding the fact that a counter affidavit has been filed denying his claim learned Counsel; for the petitioner submits that he has instruction to state that his representation covered by certain decision of this Court may be directed to be disposed. Learned Counsel for the State rightly submitted that while considering his representation the stand taken in the counter affidavit shall be very relevant. Let the representation of the petitioner be disposed off within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. It is made clear that the nature of the present order is based on the request of the Counsel for the petitioner and is not an order of the Court disposing off the writ petition. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)