IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6339 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:- 18.10.2011 Neelam Pathak ...Petitioner Versus Hari Singh & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. RITU BAHRI J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to application which was filed by him before the trial Court to lead additional evidence as the Hand Writing and Finger Expert, which was not examined when the evidence was led by the petitioner. The said application was dismissed on 28.09.2011. The plaintiff had executed agreement to sell dated 15.12.2003 and his case is that the signatures were obtained on blank stamp papers. The plaintiff had made an application to produce the original agreement to sell in Court. This agreement to sell was produced in Court in original for the first time on 17.05.2011. Prior to this date, the defendants in their written statement dated 15.09.2009 had stated that agreement has been filed in complaint case under Section 420 IPC. The plaintiff could not produce said document or lead any additional evidence before 17.05.2011 and it was produced by the defendant. In view of the above, this petition is allowed with cost of ` 2000/-. Order dated 28.09.2011 is set aside. The trial Court is directed to give one opportunity to plaintiff to summon hand writing expert. October 18, 2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) G.Arora JUDGE