IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN THURSDAY, THE 17TH DECEMBER 2009 / 26TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 Crl.Rev.Pet.No.1822 of 2006 --------------------------------- CRL.A. 301/2005 OF ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT (ADHOC II), THODUPUZHA. CC.617/05 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, THODUPUZHA. ----------------- REVN. PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED: ------------------------------------------------ NARAYANAN NAMBIAR, S/O. K.P.KELU NAMBIAR, R/AT KATTOOR HOUSE, PANATHOOR P.O., HOSDURG TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY MR.KODOTH SREEDHARAN, ADVOCATE. RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT: ---------------------------------------------------- 1. BIJU EMMANUEL, S/O. EMMANUEL, KOCHUPURACKAL HOUSE, KOLANI P.O., NEDIASALA KARA, KARIMKUNNAM VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY MR.K.J.KURIACHAN, ADVOCATE, FOR R1. BY MR.JAYAKRISHNAN, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.S.GOPINATHAN,J. ========================== Crl.R.P.No.1822 of 2006 ========================== Dated this the 17th day of December, 2009 ORDER Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Thodupuzha, in C.C.No.617/2005 on his file convicted the revision petitioner for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to simple imprisonment for one month and to pay Rs.3,50,000/- (Rupees three lakh fifty thousand only) as compensation to the first respondent who was the complainant before the trial court. In Crl.Appeal No.301/2005, by judgment dated 12.8.2006, the Addl. Sessions Judge (ADHOC)-II, Thodupuzha, while confirming the conviction and sentence, dismissed the appeal. Learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the revision petitioner is no more and he is not taking any steps to implead the legal heirs. Learned counsel sought for time for payment of the compensation. The submission made by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner is recorded and the revision petition is dismissed as abated. The legal heirs of the Crl.R.P.No.1822/2006 2 revision petitioner, though not on record, are granted six months time to remit the compensation. P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE. dvs