IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 19TH DECEMBER 2011 / 28TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 10320 of 2011() ------------------------------------------- (CRIME NO.439/2011 OF ULIKKAL POLICE STATION,KANNUR DISTRICT) ........ PETITIONER (S): ACCUSED 1, 3 TO 6: ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. JOBY VARGHESE , S/O.VARGHESE @VAKKACHAN, AGED 20 YEARS, VALIYAKULATHIL HOUSE, VAYATHOOR AMSOM, ARABI, KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. P.V.ROBIN, S/O.VARGHESE, AGED 22 YEARS, VALIYAKULATHIL HOUSE, VAYATHOOR AMSOM, ARABI, KANNUR DISTRICT. 3. VINODAN, S/O.DAMODARAN, AGED 34 YEARS, PANIPPALAM HOUSE, VAYATHOOR AMSOM, ARABI, KANNUR DISTRICT. 4. SANTHOSH K.V, S/O.SASI, AGED 28 YEARS, KURIAN PLACKAL HOUSE, VAYATHOOR AMSOM, ARABI,KANNUR DISTRICT. 5. SUDHEESH @ KITTU, RESIDING... DO.. BY ADV. SRI.CIBI THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: ---------------------------------------------------- THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ULIKKAL POLICE STATION, REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 31. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. R.RANJITH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/12/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V. RAMKUMAR, J. .................................................... Bail Application No. 10320 of 2011 ..................................................... Dated: 19th December, 2011 ORDER Petitioners, who are accused Nos. 1,2 to 6 in Crime No. 439 of 2011 of Ulikkal Police Statiuon , Kannur District for offences punishable under Sections 341, 506 (1), 294 (b) and 436 read with Sec. 149 I.P.C. seek their enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 2-12-2011. Petitioners were arrested on 3-11-2011. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners, the relative conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioners, the sentiments of the near relatives of the victim and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioners are released on bail, they will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioners making themselves scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. Dated this the 19th day of December, 2011. Sd/-V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) ani/ /true copy/ P.S. to Judge