IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3264 of 2010 1. ABDUL QAYUM @ MD.QAYUM ANSARI 2. Salahuddin @ Md. Salahuddin 3. Nezammuddin 4. Md. Shahabuddin 5. Shahin Parveen 6. Taslima Khatoon Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 6/ 22.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that all the allegations are false and frivolous with a view to save themselves from the allegation made by petitioner no.6. According to the learned counsel, really dowry was being demand and torture was caused for its non-fulfillment. Petitioner no.6 gave birth of a female child. Some months thereafter she again became pregnant. For that cause, she was driven away from matrimonial house. So, a case on her behalf against all the family members for the offence under Section 498A of the I.P.C. and other allied sections of the I.P.C. filed. In that circumstance if the allegation is considered, that is doubted for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Govindpur P.S. Case No. 62 of 2009 above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Nawada subject to the conditions 2 as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)