IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17601 of 2009 RAJAN SAH @ RAJAN KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 26.08.2009 Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking bail in a case instituted under section 392 IPC. The informant was traveling on a motor-cycle. He was intercepted by the miscreants. At gunpoint, he was relieved of the motor-cycle. A few days thereafter, the petitioner was arrested while riding the said motor-cycle. Two of the said accuseds managed to flee away. The petitioner was arrested along with the motor-cycle and certain fire-arms/ammunitions. He is in custody since 07.01.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with reference to the recovery of the motor-cycle, a substantive case has been lodged against the petitioner in which he has been granted bail. It is further contended that neither the petitioner nor the looted article has been put on test identification parade. Looking to the allegations and the materials collected in support thereof including recovery as also keeping in focus the period for which he is in custody, this court is not persuaded to admit the petitioner to bail. His prayer for bail is, accordingly, rejected. 2 However, the petitioner is given liberty to renew his prayer for bail if the trial of the case is not taken up within seven months from the date of receipt/communication of this order in the court below. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )