1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 700 OF 2008 Smt.Laxmibai S. Mungekar & Ors. ....Appellants V/s. Sarthak Co-op.Hsg.Soc.Ltd. & Ors. ....Respondents WITH APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 715 OF 2008 Sai Developers ....Appellants V/s. Sarthak Co-op.Hsg.Soc.Ltd. & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.J.S. Kini i/b Mr.Suresh Dubey for the Appellants in Appeal (Lodging) No.700 of 2008 and Respondent Nos.2 to 5 in Appeal (Lodging) No.715 of 2008. Mr.S.C. Naidu i/b C.R. Naidu & Co. for Respondent No.1 in Appeal (Lodging) Nos.700 of 2008 and 715 of 2008. Mr.A.A. Kumbhakoni, Senior Counsel with Mr.Vishal Kanade i/b Sanjay Gawade for the Appellant in Appeal (Lodging) No.715 of 2008. CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & S.J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATE : 25TH JUNE, 2009. P.C. : 1. Heard Mr.Kumbhakoni and Mr.Kini the learned counsel for the Appellants. Both the Appeals have impugned the order dated 2 23.10.2008 passed in Notice of Motion No.2985 of 2008. Limited prayer in terms of the demolition of the temporary shed was allowed by the impugned order and we are informed today by the learned counsel that the said shed has already been removed. Hence both the Appeals have become infructuous. 2. Both the Appeals are dismissed as infructuous. However, we make it clear that this order should not be read as confirmation or approval of the observations made in the said order dated 23.10.2008. (S.J.VAZIFDAR, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.)