1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5734/2010 (Sahebrao Pundlikrao Hivrale and another vrs. The State of Mah and others) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. S.D.Chande, Adv for Petitioners Mrs. I.L.Bodade, AGP for R-1 to 3 CORAM: R.K.DESHPANDE J. DATED: 5 th JULY , 2011. This petition challenges the concurrent finding of facts recorded by the courts below. The complaint filed by the petitioners invoking the jurisdiction of the Labour Court under Section 28 read with Item 1 of Schedule IV of the Unfair Labour Practices Act has been dismissed. The courts below have recorded the finding that the petitioners were retrenched from service after giving one month's notice in writing and payment of retrenchment compensation. The finding is recorded that there is no pleading in the complaint that the juniors were retained in service. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that, the petitioners have continuously 2 worked for 240 days. He has relied upon the so called admission in the written statement of the respondents. The contention is of no consequence for the reason that the termination has been effected by following the provisions of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act. There is no perversity brought to my notice in the findings recorded by the Courts below. There is no error of jurisdiction. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE Rvjalit