1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 472/2008 (Marta & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 28/03/2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. Shambhoo Singh, for the petitioners. Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press the bail application filed on behalf of petitioner No.1 Marta. The bail application filed by petitioner No.1 Marta is therefore, dismissed as not pressed. However, having heard learned counsel for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that witness Mohan has named Marta and Lala and so far as the petitioner No.2 Laxman is concerned, he has not been named in the statements, nothing has been recovered from the petitioner No.2, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner No.2 on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed by petitioner No.2 Laxman under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Laxman S/o Mangla be released on bail in FIR No. 187/2007 P.S. Dhambola, provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 2 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP