IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-11227 of 2008 Date of decision : 9.9.2008 Dr. Bhagwan Singh Sandhu ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. R.S.Bains, Advocate for applicant-appellants Mr. Shilesh Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab S. D. ANAND, J. It is common ground that the petitioner was not apprehended at the spot. In fact, an averment made to that effect appears in the First Information Report itself. The investigating agency has not been able to collect any evidence to the effect that the petitioner was registered owner of the car out of which the impugned recovery had been effected. Bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ludhiana. September 09, 2008 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE