IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8967 of 2008 SIYA RAM MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the Petitioner : M/S. R. Griyaghey & Sunil Kumar For the Respondents: Mrs. Nilu Agrawal, G.A. X ------------ P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal ------------ Dated, the 21st July, 2008. In the counter affidavit filed by respondent nos. 3,4, 5 and 6 following statements have been made in paragraphs 7 and 13 which reads thus : “7. That with regard to the statement made in paragraph no. 2(iv) of the writ petition, copy of the representation has been sent to S.D.O., Barh for enquiry and necessary action vide letter No. 2900 dated 9.7.2008. 13. That with regard to the statements made in paragraph no. 7,8, 9 of the writ petition, the petitioner has already filed a representation before the District Programme Officer, who has directed the S.D.O. Barh vide letter no. 2900 dated 9.7.2008 to enquire and act accordingly. The petitioner has been provided all the information in detail, which he demanded through right to the Information Act. “ In view thereof, Mr. R. Griyaghey, counsel for the petitioner, submits that the grievance of the petitioner does not survive any more. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. R. M. Lodha, CJ Kishore K. Mandal, J AMIN/- - 2 -