IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 9480 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 29, 2010 M/s Vbros Auto Pvt. Ltd. …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Addl. AG, Haryana, for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Arun Walia, Advocate, for respondent No. 4. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution challenges notification dated 25.1.2008 (P-3), issued under Section 4 read with Section 17 (1) and 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for brevity, ‘the Act’) and declaration dated 18.3.2008 (P-4) made under Section 6 of the Act. It is pertinent to notice that the petitioner has also filed another petition, namely, CWP No. 12165 of 2009, challenging another notification dated 5.2.2007 to the extent it contains the alignment of the proposed V-2(a) road as given in the final drawing made pursuant to the proposals under Head No. 1 “Provision of Additional Road Links between Delhi and Gurgaon” as well as under Head No.4 “Transport and Communication” from Dwarka CWP No. 9480 of 2008 (O&M) Residential Complex to Delhi to Palam Vihar, Gurgaon in the Final Development Plan 2021 AD for Gurgaon-Manesar Urban Complex. In the said petition, the petitioner has also challenged order dated 8.7.2009, passed by the Financial Commissioner and Principal Secretary to Government Haryana, Town and Country Planning Department, Haryana rejecting the objections filed by the petitioner. A settlement has been arrived at between the parties. Accordingly, by a separate order of even date, we have disposed of CWP No. 12165 of 2009. In view of above, this petition has been rendered infructuous and the same is disposed of as such. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) May 29, 2010 JUDGE Pkapoor 2