IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI WRIT PETITION NO : 18054 of 1994 Between: 1. B.Veera Raghavulu, S/o. Pattabhi Ramanna, aged 55 years, Occupation: Service, R/o. Nizamabad. 2. P.Venugopal Rao, S/o. Anjaneyulu, aged about 55 years, Occupation: Service, R/o. Pallakollu, W.G.Dist. ..... PETITIONERS AND The Land Acquisition Officer and Revenue Divisional Officer, Nizamabad. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to re-determine the compensation awarded under Sec.28-A of Land Acquisition Act pertaining to the petitioners lands on the basis of the amount of compensation awarded by the Additional District Judge, Nizamabad on 11-12-90 in O.P.No.245 of 1987 by issue of a Writ of Mandamus or any other writ, order or direction. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR. P.S.MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: When the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in State of Andhra Pradesh v. Marri Venkaiah (A.I.R. 2003 Supreme Court, 2949). Following the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. ____________ 15th July, 2004 Nsr. To 1. The Land Acquisition Officer and Revenue Divisional Officer, Nizamabad. 2. Two CCs to GP for Land Acquisition, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 3. Two CD copies.