AB 2232/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.R. SARMA Heard Mr. R. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. BS Sinha, learned Public Prosecutor, Assam. Perused the case diary. By this application u/s 438 CrPC, the petitioner , Dr. Samsul Alam @ Dr. Shamsul Alom, has prayed for pre-arrest bail in the even t of his arrest in connection with Chhaygaon PS Case No. 117/11 u/s 294/447/325/ 379/506/34 IPC. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has b een falsely implicated in this case by the complainant, out of grudge. From the record, it appears that a criminal case lodged by the informant of this case u/s 375/506 IPC is pending against the petitioner. The allegation made in this case, against the petitioner, is that on the night of 24.4.2011, the petit ioner along with some others trespassed into the house of the complainant’s fath er, threatened all the family members, and also took away some money and valuabl e articles by causing assault to the family members. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the allegation brought against the petitioners as well as the materials available in the case d iary, I do not find it to be a fit case for granting the benefit of pre-arrest b ail in favour of the petitioner. Hence, the prayer for bail stands rejected. Return the case diary.