'^R^:/iJ i'LE; Btl'»^ra ^ .\0 $^\ I ^ J^ A IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FC.G.1 WRIT PETITION N0. i 47 ^T /2005 PETITIONER M/s Mahesh Prasad Singh son of Shri Saligram Singh, aged about 30 years, Coal merchant and transporter, resident of near Budhiya Dharamkanta, Ambikapur, District Surguja [C.G.] RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1] ^ ^ t o'2> ^ \£^- ^:^ • ^\:..-^' 2] State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Mines, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur [C.G.] The Collector, Ambikapur, District Surguja [C.G.] ^ ...^RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. XI-HC-22 3^T ^tJ^M^, ^Tfl^^l^, [sKrll'dy fz HTO^ip^m^ 3i!^i ^?ken . ^ ^ /(/99 5^ 200 s- 3TI^T^T RFH^3:n^T rf?cf ^n^^T w^\ ^diw^r ^i^I^^-i ^i<4^iT^ftel:A<t^^i< ^3:rf^T3T^fT 15.04.2005:- Shri V.K.Pandey, learnect co Shri Parag Kotecha, learned insel for the petitioner. P.L. forthe State/respondents. The instant petition has beei| order of the Collector, Ambikaput whereby the respondent No. 2 dif Depot within the District ofAmbikap|ur preferred by the petitioner against the respondent No.2 dated 07.04.2005 ected the petitioner to close hte Coal Learned counsel for the petj procured the coal from the Soutfl registered trader with the Comn^ercial Chhattisgarh, even then without been directed by the order of An( :ioner submits that he has i^en tegally Eastern Coal Ltd and he is a duty apy assigning any reason. Learned couhsel wf- served if the respondents fe dir^( Annexure P/3 submitted by him on| a stipulated period. He further sufctmits this Courl has passed interim ordef shail not be given effect to till the ne^d: T^. F^td® Department of State of authority cf law, the petitioner has lexure P/1 to close his Depot without submits that ends of justice wtil be cted to decide the representation of 21.03.2005 to respondent No.2 within that in other connected petitions, to the effect that the impugned order dateof hearing;) i have heard learned counsel the case. for the parties and have gone through Havjng eonsidered the facts the opinion that the ©ndsof justice directed to dispose of the represent|ition ^nd drcumstances of the case, 1 am of ^/iJI be sen/ed ifthe respondent No. 2 is of Annexure P/3 by a reasoned ^^fe^) tt B / \ XI-HC-22 ^^ r^i^i<n^, ^Tf1<^^i$, facni^y 3Tli^T q^^ —.^.:7?/./. ^mc<ii<^^i€h W^ 200 S' f^^;' 3TT^?T^T ^14) 3TT^T ^RT^^f?cT 3Ti^T ^•cTTW^ '!?cT order within a period of two montlhs copy of this order and till the pursuance of the order ofAnnQxurb 2. from the date of receipt of certified r^presentation is decided. no actjon m P/1 shall b©taken by respondent No. In the aforesaid observation^ <=t)i<M?cn41<ri ^i^^iT^:tec^'<{^^i< ^^rf^T^TT^T . the petitjon stands disposed of. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge