CRLR No. 86 of 2011 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate, present for the revisionist. Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate, present for the respondent. Heard. This revision is directed against the order dated 27.04.2011, passed by Judge, Family Court, Haridwar, in Case No. 117 of 2006, whereby said court has dismissed the application under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. Perusal of the impugned order shows that the revisionist was a married woman and her earlier marriage was not dissolved. She got married to present respondent, from whom she is seeking maintenance. The trial court after discussing the evidence found that the revisionist is not the legally wedded wife of the respondent. It is also concluded by the trial court that the revisionist concealed the fact of her earlier marriage with Sanjeev Mahrotra, from the respondent. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties, and after going through the papers on record, this court does not find any error of law committed by the trial court in dismissing the application moved by the applicant (revisionist) seeking maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. Therefore, the revision is summarily sed. dismis (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 11.05.2011 HN