(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2686 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2686 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2686 OF 2005 WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2687 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2687 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2687 OF 2005 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1230 OF 2002 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1230 OF 2002 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1230 OF 2002 Atul Kantilal Shah ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ..... Mr. K.M. Sanghavi, Advocate for Applicant Mr. Y.S. Shinde, A.P.P. for State. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. DATED: 21ST JUNE, 2005 DATED: 21ST JUNE, 2005 DATED: 21ST JUNE, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. Heard both sides. 2. The learned advocate for the applicant states that the Criminal application No. 2687 of 2005 has been preferred for restoration of Criminal Appeal No. 1230 of 2002 and Criminal Application No. 2686 of 2005 has been preferred for condonation of delay in filing restoration application i.e. Criminal Application No.2687 of 2005, however, after going through the papers, it is seen that the Criminal Appeal No. 1230 of 2002 has already been restored to file by order dated 1.4.2004. Hence, both these applications do not survive and the same are disposed of as infructuous. *****