S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6937/2008 Smt. Vimal Lata Taylor Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. Date of Order :: 9.9.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. Manish Pitaliya, for the petitioner. ... The respondents denied consideration of the petitioner for appointment to the post of Prabodhak in view of the provisions of sub- rule 4 of Rule 17 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Prabodhak Rules, 2008 that prescribes that, “ no candidate shall be eligible for appointment to the service who has more than two children on or after 01.06.2002.” The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the prescription of such dis-qualification with retrospective effect is bad. I do not find any substance in the argument advanced. As a matter of fact the dis-qualification prescribed is not at all retrospective. The Rules came into force in the year 2008 and in the Rules under Sub- rule 4 of Rule 17, such, disqualification is prescribed. The petitioner is admittedly having third child after 1.6.2002, and as such, he was rightly denied consideration for appointment as Prabodhak under the Rules of 2008. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR), J. Jgoyal