THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Writ Petition Nos.1135 and 1150 of 2011 COMMON ORDER (Per Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed, J) Since both these writ petitions are filed seeking a Mandamus to declare the action of the first respondent-Debts Recovery Tribunal, Visakhapatnam (for short ‘the Tribunal’), in not disposing of S.A.Nos.161 and 156 of 2010 respectively, as illegal and arbitrary, they are being disposed of together by this common order. 2. The petitioner is one and the same in both the writ petitions. The petitioner, who is the auction purchaser of the property in question, paid the entire bid amount to the Authorized Officer. While so, one Vunnam Venkata Satyanarayana and Vikrama Ramana Rao filed S.A.Nos.161 and 156 of 2010 respectively, before the Tribunal claiming tenancy of the property in question and obtained interim stay of all further proceedings. The petitioner states that in view of the stay granted by the Tribunal in the appeals and though the said order has not been extended further, the property has not been delivered to him in spite of depositing the entire sale consideration. Hence, he filed the present writ petitions. 3. Today, when the matters are taken up for admission, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the petitioner has deposited the entire sale consideration, a direction may be given to the Tribunal to dispose of the said appeals. 4. Since the petitioner, who is the auction purchaser of the property in question, had deposited the entire bid amount, and the property has not been delivered to him, without going into the merits of the matter, we deem it appropriate to direct the Tribunal to dispose of S.A.Nos.161 and 156 of 2010, expeditiously, within a period of two months from today. 5 . With the above direction, both the Writ Petitions are disposed of. No order as to costs. _____________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J _______________ K.G.SHANKAR, J Date:31.01.2011. Note: Issue CC forthwith sj