(1) / sr^> IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. fS) N0. ^ @> ^ /2008 PETITIONER C,°"e i^ ..•<'fi.<,.- fc6v^?>: ^^^--" .N) 'F .^ f y:\^- ^"yy'\b RESPONDENTS ff •^ '^ <»' s" '&.-S? w ^ G Nand Kumar Nayak, Aged about 40 years, S/o Shibo Ram Nayak, Occupation- "Agriculturist and Ex- Guruji under the Education Guarantee Scheme, R/o Village Rajpalpur, Bhatapara, District- Raipur (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary, Panchayat Department, Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) D.K.S, Janpad through Officer, (C.G.) Panchayat Pithaura, its Chief Executive Districf-Mahasamund Collector Cum Chairman Education Guarantee Scheme, Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTIOrLQFINDIA __IS^JC*W^'-^M-^ ^ HIGH COURT OF GHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 5840 of 2008 Petitioiier Nand Kuxnar Nayak Versus ' • Respondeuts State of Chhattisgarh & ofhers (Writ Petition under Article 226 offlie Constitution oflndia) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aguihotri J.) ShriAbhay Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A. V. Shridhar, Pauel Lawyer for the respondeats No. 1 aad 3. OR^E R(oralt ( Passed on tbis 1st day ofFebruary, 2010) Heard. ! 1. Leanied couasel appearing for fhe petitipner, on iastructions, subinits that the petitioner seeks pennission of fhis Court to withdraw this petition with Uberty to make a representation to fhe CQinpetent aufhority. 2. Learaed counsel appearing for fhe respondents has no objection. 3. In view ofthe above, fhe wiit petition is disnussed as wifbdrawn wifh fhe above-stated liberty, if so advise; ^—-~ SatishK.^gnyiotri ___ Judge ThafcuT