IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39928 of 2010 PAPPU YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2 3.11.2010 This application has been filed for restoration of Cr.Misc.No. 21779 of 2010 which stood dismissed not having been complied with the peremptory order dated 15.7.2010 within time granted to the petitioner to take steps for fresh service of notice on opposite party no.2 under both processes. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that inadvertantly the clerk of the counsel for the petitioner could not file the requisites for issuance of notice within the stipulated time and also not informed to the concerned counsel. As such, peremptory order to take steps for fresh service of notice could not be complied with. The prayer is made to allow the restoration application and restore Cr.Misc.No. 21779 of 2010. In view of submissions made in the restoration application, the same is allowed and Cr.Misc.No. 21779 of 2010 is restored to its 2 original file, subject to compliance of the order dated 15.7.2010 passed in Cr.Misc.No. 21779 of 2010. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.)