CRM-M No. 14889 of 2011 **** Kishan Lal and another vs. State of Haryana and another Present: Mr.Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Man Mohan Sikka, DAG, Haryana. Ms. Avinash Mandla, Advocate for the complainant. **** This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in case bearing FIR No. 11 dated 19.1.2011, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC registered at Police Station Farrukh Nagar, Gurgaon. On 30.05.2011, the following order was passed:- “ On 16.5.2011, the following contentions were noticed:- “ Learned counsel states that the facts as narrated in the FIR do not bring out the true picture because the loan was created in the year 2001/2006 while the case was finally decided on 28.7.2010. Till that time the petitioner was bona fide pursuing the litigation and it could not be held that he had any mens rea till that time. Learned counsel further states that petitioner is ready to give adequate security to the bank if it is so required.” Counsel for the complainant states that the only apprehension of the complainant is that now his property is under mortgage. Counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners should be granted four weeks' time to crate fresh security. Counsel for the complainant states that if the petitioners create some other security, she would have no objection to the extension of bail. Adjourned to 19.7.2011. Interim order to continue.” CRM-M No. 14889 of 2011 -2- Thereafter on 19.07.2011 the following order was passed:- “ Learned counsel for the petitioners states that rather than creating fresh security the entire amount has since been paid. Learned counsel for the complainant seeks a short adjournment to verify the same. Adjourned to 08.08.2011. Interim order to to continue.” Leaned Counsel for the complainant has accepted the fact that the entire amount has now been deposited. In this view of the matter this petition is allowed. In the event of arrest of the petitioners, they shall be released on bail by the investigating officer to his satisfaction subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE August 08, 2011 sunita