/ ^ HIGH COURT OE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PET1TION (O No. 3004 of2009 PEZinONER : Murari Chandrakar S/o Late ^iri K.L.Chajridrafair, aged :about '55 y^ars, Giiidhiyari Para^ Arang, District Raipur (CO) , VERSUS RE8PONDENT8 : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S.' E&awaiEi, Mantralaya-. Raipur (C€j) 2,. Collector, Raipur,. District Raipw (CG^) 3, Gram Paachayat, Khamtarai, Block A-ang, Di^trict Raijyar'throiigfa ite Siarpaflfifa. 4. Patwari, Patwari Halka No. 25/58, Village Kalai, R.I. Circle Araiig, Tahsil Arang, District Raipur (CG) WR1T PET1TION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CON8TITUTION OF INDIA SB:HoifMeShriSattshK,Agn& Present: ShriB.D.Gam.Advocateforttepetitioncr. Shri Asiirito Das, Panel Lawyer for the StaWrespoiiideiits. C»KDER(ORAL) (Passed on 03rd day of Juty, 2009) 1» Shri .Akmrito Das, leamed Pan€!l Lawyer a()pearitig for (he State^respoiideiits submits that the petitioner has filed a representation dated 13 Febmary, 2009 (Annexiire P/5) before the respoiident No. 2. Ifthe representatioxi is still. peiiding consideration, fhe same shall be considered and decided wtthm a period offour weeks from the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. 2. In view of the above, according to leamed coumel q>peariiig f@r the petitionen nothmg sun?ives for adjudication. 3. Accordmgly, fhe writ petition stands <isposed of Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amifc