IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.554 of 2009 Vandana . Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors . ----------- 3. 24.06.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The writ petition was filed on 12.1.2009 questioning an order of termination from the post of Anganwari Sevika dated 14.11.2008. Nearly two and half years later counter affidavit is yet to be filed. However an objection is raised on behalf of the respondents that the petitioner has a remedy of an appeal before the Divisional Commissioner. Had the respondents filed a counter affidavit, the matter may have been given a quietus today without remanding it to the competent authority keeping in mind that two and half years have passed. That is not possible due to laxity of the respondents in refusing to assist the Court in timely dispensation of justice. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the CDPO Lakhisarai did not even give copy of the original order of the District Magistrate dated 29.10.2008 of dismissal but only communicated it to her by the impugned order. Learned Counsel for the State very fairly submits that if the petitioner has not been furnished copy of the final order of dismissal she is entitled to the same. The Court directs that on the date that the petitioner appears before the District Magistrate along with a copy of the present order the latter is bound to ensure himself that the order of dismissal dated 29.10.2008 is handed over to the petitioner within a maximum period of 72 hours from the time of request. If the petitioner then files an appeal before the Divisional Commissioner within a period of 30 days from the date that copy of the impugned order is made available to her, let the Commissioner consider the appeal and after hearing all concerned dispose of the matter by a reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of three months from the date of presentation of such memo of appeal. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)