THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.20322 of 2010 ORDER: In view of pendency of revision before the first respondent, having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents, this writ petition is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission. There was an assignment of land to an extent of Ac.0.73 cents and Ac.0.88 cents covered by Survey Nos.762/1A and 762/2A respectively, situated at Moram Village, Palamaner Mandal, Chittoor District, in favour of the brother of the petitioner. It is the case of the petitioner that in the family partition between the petitioner and his brother, the original assignee, the said land fell to his share and he is in continuous possession. On the ground that portion of the aforesaid land was being used for non-agricultural purposes, the third respondent - Tahsildar, Palamaner, vide order bearing Roc.A3/410/2009, dated 02.12.2009, ordered resumption of the land in question. As against the same, the petitioner preferred appeal before the second respondent - Revenue Divisional Officer, Madanapalle. The appellate authority rejected his appeal vide order bearing D.Dis. (B1)/7389/2009, dated 25.06.2010. Aggrieved by the order of the appellate authority, he preferred a revision before the first respondent – Joint Collector, Chittoor, and a notice of hearing was given in proceedings in Roc.E4/9781/2010, dated 07.08.2010. It is the grievance of the petitioner that in spite of the application of the petitioner for grant of interim orders, no orders have been passed and during pendency of the revision petition, respondents are taking steps for his eviction from the aforesaid land. In view of pendency of revision, it is for the petitioner to plead his grounds before the revisional authority. As it is stated that initially, the land was assigned to the brother of the petitioner and after partition, it is in continuous uninterrupted possession of the petitioner and as the revision petition is also posted for hearing, I deem it appropriate to direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the lands covered by the order of the third respondent, till appropriate final orders are passed by the revisional authority and such orders are communicated to the petitioner. Subject to the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 17th AUGUST, 2010. Note: ‘wire’ already sent. kvni