GPN-J-332-ARHCB-8_94-13,10,500-ALA4. SPL.H.C.A.S.C.D. 79e. FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1522 OF 2001 WRIT PETITION NO. 1522 OF 2001 WRIT PETITION NO. 1522 OF 2001 Prabhakar Shankar Panchal ...Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri R.K.Mendadkar for the petitioner - absent Shri A.S.Chandeparkar for Respt.2 Shri A.M.Shringarpure APP for State. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR, J. V.G. PALSHIKAR, J. V.G. PALSHIKAR, J. DTAED; DTAED; DTAED; 20TH JUNE, 2005 20TH JUNE, 2005 20TH JUNE, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. By this petition, the petitioner has impugned the order dated 30-4-2001 by which the learned District & Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri found that the injuries caused to the complainant were very minor and therefore applying the provisions of section 95 of IPC the learned Judge refused to take any cognizance of the matter. In view of the fact that the injuries are very minor, I see no reason to interfere. There is no jurisdictional error or legal error committed by the learned Judge in passing the impugned order. Hence application is dismissed. ....