IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39592 of 2010 VIMALA DEVI & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 3.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petition has been filed by the two petitioners against the order dated 29.7.2010 passed by the FTC III, Biharsharif, Nalanda in S.T. No. 307 of 2010. After having heard learned counsel for the parties and after having perused the impugned order the court finds no merit in the petition. It is dismissed accordingly. However, it is a matter of regret that the S.D.J.M., Biharsharif while passing the order dated 3.8.2009 was forgetting plenary duties of looking to the case diary for finding out as to what offences were made out and as to who the real culprits were and was not passing any order against accused Hiria Devi, against whom the investigation was kept pending. The court directs the S.D.J.M., Biharsharif to peruse the case diary and other connected materials submitted by the police while submitting final report on the basis of which order dated 3.8.2009 was passed and find out whether there is any material sufficient to put said Hiria Devi on trial. If he finds out sufficient material to put her on trial, she also will be put on trial. Thereafter the trial shall be concluded in a composite manner. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)