1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.10937/2008. Smt.Anupama Bhargava and Another. VERSUS M/s.Shanti Lal Taksali & Sons. 06.02.2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.Sudesh Bansal ] Mr.Vipul Jain ] for the petitioners. ***** Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the impugned order by which the application submitted by the petitioner for amendment in the written statement has been dismissed. Admittedly, the application for eviction was filed in the year 2004 and the written statement also came to be filed in the year 2004 and, thereafter, the rejoinder to the same was also filed with the leave of the court in the year 2004. The present application has been filed by the defendant for amendment of the written statement at a much belated stage in the year 2007. In the facts and circumstances, the learned trial court has exercised the jurisdiction vested in it. Therefore, I find no good ground to interfere with the impugned order in the writ jurisdiction. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed 2 summarily. The petitioner, if so advised, may raise these grounds in the appeal, if so advised. Subject to the above, the writ petition stands dismissed summarily. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.