- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3845 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.3845 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.3845 OF 2008 Dr.Vijay G. Tapase ...Applicant vs. Mr.Dinesh Modi & Anr. ...Respondents Mr.P.D.Desai for the applicant Mr.V.M.Nakhawa A.P.P. for State Mr.Prakash Naik for the Respondent no.2. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : APRIL 15,2009 : APRIL 15,2009 : APRIL 15,2009 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The learned counsel for the parties have tendered consent terms duly signed by the applicant and the first respondent. The consent terms records that in view of the settlement between the parties original complainant (first respondent) has agreed to compound the offences. The consent terms are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. 2. In view of the consent terms, the revision application is disposed of by passing the following order : . Impugned Judgments and orders are quashed and set aside and the applicant is acquitted of the offences alleged against him. . By consent the applicant is permitted to withdraw a sum of Rs.75,000/- deposited by him with the Sessions Court. - 2 - JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE