THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.9409 of 2009 Dated 14th June, 2011 Between: V.Munaswamy Naidu …Petitioner And Union of India, rep.by the General Manager, South Central Railway, Rail Nilayam, Secunderabad and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: None appeared Counsel for respondents: Sri P.Gangarami Reddy The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in terminating the licence of the petitioner issuing termination No.G/W/277129/CTO/W-III, dated 08.08.2008, as being illegal, unjust, arbitrary and violative of Section 60(b) of the Easements Act r/w Article 300-A, Article 19(1)(g) and Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to set aside the Termination Notice G/W/277/129/CTO/W-III dated 08.08.2008 issued by the 3rd respondent.” At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. Sri P.Gangarami Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, submitted that this writ petition is similar to those writ petitions, which were disposed of by this Court by common order, dated 13.06.2011. Following the reasons contained therein, this writ petition is dismissed with the direction that the order in W.P.No.9481 of 2009 and batch, shall form part of this order. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, the interim order, dated 01.05.2009, is vacated and W.P.M.P.No.12295 of 2009 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 14th June, 2011 VGB