[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION W.P.NO.1844 OF 2009 Habib Education & Welfare Society and Anr. ..Petitioners Vs. National Council for Teacher Education, Bhopal ..Respondent ... Ms.Deepa Chavan i/b M/s.Halai & Co. for Petitioners Mr.Uday Warunjikar counsel for Respondent ... CORAM: BILAL NAZKI AND CORAM: BILAL NAZKI AND CORAM: BILAL NAZKI AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : APRIL 20, 2009 DATE : APRIL 20, 2009 DATE : APRIL 20, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The Petitioner No.2-Institution is a minority Institution. Petitioners applied for permission to start an Institution. The application was rejected by the Respondent. Mainly the Respondent rejected the application on the ground that though the Petitioners had been informed to remove certain deficiencies within 90 days, but on inspection, it was found that the deficiencies had not been removed. The Petitioners contended in the petition that removal of any deficiencies was never communicated to the Petitioners. In the [-2-] counter-affidavit, it has been accepted that the notice to remove deficiencies was sent to the Petitioners but it came back unclaimed. Therefore, as a matter of fact, the Petitioners were never informed that they had to remove certain deficiencies. Therefore, the order impugned, is set aside. Writ Petition is allowed and the Respondents are directed to consider the application of the Petitioners afresh. The Petitioners are advised to remove the deficiencies which were pointed out to them earlier or which may be pointed out by Respondent by any fresh communication. 2. Petition is disposed of accordingly. [BILAL NAZKI, J.] [BILAL NAZKI, J.] [BILAL NAZKI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]