THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA W.P.NO.8082 OF 2006 12-11-2010 BETWEEN: E.Sushela wife of Late E.Ram Reddy ...Petitioner vs. Warangal District Co-operative Central Bank Limited, by its General Manager and others ...Respondents THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA W.P.NO.8082 OF 2006 ORAL ORDER: The petitioner has prayed for an appointment on compassionate grounds The petitioner’s husband (E.Ram Reddy) was appointed as a Superviso on 08-03-1977 with the 1st respondent-Warangal District Co-operativ Central Bank, Warangal and later he expired on 29-01-2004 while in service After his death, the petitioner sought appointment on compassionate grounds fo her daughter who completed her graduation. However, no appointment o compassionate grounds was offered by the respondents, is the grievance of th petitioner herein. Further the grievance of the petitioner is that though sh submitted a representation to the respondents for appointment of her daughter o compassionate grounds, the same has not yet been disposed of. Hence this wr petition. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents are dut bound to offer appointment on compassionate grounds to the daughter of th petitioner in terms of the 3rd respondent’s Circular Memorandum bearin Rc.No.4305/2003/CR/DCCBS/IIB dated 23-10-2004. In response, the counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and states that the Government of Andhra Pradesh had issued G.O.Ms.No.36 date 05-09-2001 dispensing with the scheme of compassionate appointments i Public Enterprises and directed to pay certain amounts towards ex-gratia to th dependants of the employees who died in harness, which are as under:- a) Class IV Employees …. Rs.50,000/- b) Ministerial Staff … Rs.75,000/- c) Officers and Executives .. Rs.1,00,000/- Therefore, the petitioner’s daughter is not entitled for any appointment o compassionate ground. However, the respondents 1 and 2 would be ready an willing to pay ex-gratia amount in terms of G.O.Ms.No.36 dated 05-09-2001. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would b satisfied if the ex gratia payment is made in terms of the aforementioned G.O. Keeping in view the fact that the husband of the petitioner died while h was working as a Supervisor, therefore, his case would fall under Category.C o G.O.Ms.No.36 and hence the petitioner would be entitled to receive an amount o Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees One Lakh only) towards ex gratia. Resultantly I direct the respondents 1 and 2 to pay an amount o Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees One Lakh only) towards ex gratia amount to the petitione expeditiously and in any event within a period of eight(8) weeks from today. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as t costs. ______________ ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA,J 12th NOVEMBER 2010. TSNR