1 (Cri.WP 3042 of 2010) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3042 OF 2010 M/s. United Information Technology Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. ...Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ****** Mr.Shailesh Kumar for Petitioners Mrs. V.R. Bhosale -APP for the State ****** CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 29TH OCTOBER, 2010 P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners and the learned APP for the State. 2. The Petitioners are challenging the order passed by the Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge dated 30.9.2010. By the said order, as a condition for granting bail to the Petitioners, the Petitioners have been directed to deposit Rs.2,50,000/- each. 2 (Cri.WP 3042 of 2010) 3. It is submitted that the amount fixed by the Sessions Court is unreasonable. The learned counsel for the Petitioners has invited my attention to the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Dilip Dahanukar and submitted that taking into consideration the facts of the case, the Sessions Court had erred in granting bail to the Petitioners subject to the condition of depositing Rs.2,50,000/- each. He invited my attention to the facts of the case and submitted that the complainant had not established his case. 3. In my view, it is not possible to accept the submission made by the learned counsel for the Petitioners. The case of the complainant is that the Petitioners had taken a loan of Rs.10,00,000/-. However, the said amount was not paid and the cheque which was given towards the repayment of the said amount, was dishonoured. In the case of Dilip Dahanukar, the Apex Court has observed that the sentence awarded by the Trial Court can be suspended by imposing reasonable condition. In my view, the condition imposed by the Trial Court is reasonable since the Sessions Court has directed the Petitioners to deposit 50% of the compensation amount of the cheque which was 3 (Cri.WP 3042 of 2010) dishonoured. Hence, it is not possible to entertain this petition. The writ petition is dismissed. Hearing of the appeal, however, is expedited. (V.M. KANADE J.)