c^ ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G) W.P. (S) N0. 6cS7<532—/2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^i-^^ ^•"&5^'"^-:- ^•^^^Y^-""""" '^^\w'" ^•} ^K^ '^.- f€^'^ '•J^^.] ^ &^y Kanhaiyalal Palia, aged about 64 years, S/o Late Shri Mallu Ram Palia, Retired Head Master, Govemment Middle Shcool, Tarda, Block Kartala, Distt. Korba (C.G.) VERSUS :1." Sfcate of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) / 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur (C.G.) 3f Joint Director, Treasury, Account & Pension, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4; Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Wetfare Department, Korba (C.G.) 5. District Education Officer, Korba (C.G.) 6. Block Education Officer, Kartala, District Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE ^^^ CONSTITUION OF INDIA i^^*^€te^^ HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Sl N0.6882 OF 2010 Petjtioner Kanhaiyalal Palia Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Uon»bleMr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri K.S.Pawar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondents. ORDER(ORAU (Passed on 29th day of November, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitipner submits that the petitioner is entitled to second Kramonnati as per circular dated 03.10.2008 and 11.01.2010 (Annexure P-3 and P-4) after completipn of 24years of service. He submits that the issue involved in the present petition has already been considered and decided by this Court in the matter of R.S.Verma v. State of Chhattisgarh and others (W.P.No.2805/2002) by judgment and order dated 29.8.2006. He further submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to make a representation to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the matter of State of Tripura and others v. K.K.Roy (2004 SCW/1) and the order passed in R.S. Verma (supra) to which learned counsel forthe respondents/State has no objection. 2. Accordingly, liberty sought for by the petitioner is granted to make a representation before theconcerned authority. 3. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with the aforesaid Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ashok