rTi J i/cas O^P ^^(^° DIVIStONBENCH t^lt^^UBl^t 3HT(=hL»>i*^F^. CORAM; HON'SLE SHR1 RAJEBVG| TA, GJ. HON'BLE SHR}SU KUMWRSHyHA, A Aocllcant AppeUanf Non-aDirfieanit Respondent Cr.M.P.fl^Rt No.53T1of2dO» State 9f Chhattisgait^ lirough the Police Statton Udaipur, Qistrict Surguja (C(% VEF&VS RanNiarosh, Sle> Shrt Mangateaii AffBd abod; -SO yesus, Rfe Wllage Ktotiya, i, PS Udaipur, OistritA Swguja (CG> ApplicaUonforgrantofteaTOteapped Preserrt : ShriAkhitAgraiwal^Panet Lsnwyerfwthe State. @RDER - : . (26th Mareh.aa-w) The foltowir^ orela- of the ©out wre («®sedby R^eevQu^a,C.A This matter te listed today for orders on ttie tetitionerte ttefault in not fillng an apprc^rlate applroation for cotidonation of delay in ffling the petition underSeGUon &78 (3) oftto Cr.P.G. 2) The petttlon filed by e p^ittoner / Sterte Q ^.tt.2©CS>flor grant of leave to appeal again^ the aoqdittel of ff pondent / aceused Ramrfaharosh of the Ghargss under Seetons 376 ^t) and 506 (1) of the Indiaffli Penat Ccxte Adde irapugnaJ ludgment 1»'y' dated 03.01.2009 pasaedby the ThlrdAddltional SesttonsAidge, Ambikapur, Surguja tn Sesstons Triat No.126ffl008 is tq)ort8d to be hopelessly time barred by as many as 214 days. 3) No applteatton for condonaBon of inordtnate delayof 214 days has been ffied atong with the petittei. In faet, no suGh appHcatlonhasbeeRfiledtilldrtethixig^apeEiodofmoFe^ months haselapsed since ttre flBng (rfthe p^ttlon urKler Set^on? 378 (^ of the Cr.P.0 and inspite of yiant of of^iortuntty in that behatf'videorderctatwt 19.02^010. 4) In^Ms "utow ©fth8 matter,^w®dtfcnot flnd anyju^ificatlon In the pra^r of?leEBfi«l Psael lawfyer ft)p,grant of more tlme In that behalf. 5) TheprayerofteBn«tPandlawy8r,4ierefc»e,isT^»Gtecl«i 6) Asthepetltloner/!8tateh£®nrisCTatelyfatHedlBshBwta^a^ eause much tess sufRcient caust tor the inenltoate detay ofat4 daysin (iling thepetition under Section ^8 (3) ofthe Gr;P.G.,l are left with no tither qstion, butto dismiss the petitiai as fciarred by time. ; 7) The prtUenflteclbythepetitlGner/stateunderSectten 37Q (3) of CT.P.C., for grant of t^ive tt»-ap(»alagaln^ ttie aequitol of respondent / accused Raflfttiharcali, therefore, i8<ttsmi)®®las tinne barred'. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- SunilKumarSinha Judge padma