^v^K __ p.R.No.....---;-;^^^^^. h'^Y)oe^..".-- ^gted..-—••''-'•"""" ,t*«***<rt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO. 7^006 PETITIONER D.S. Chhatri, S/o P.S. Chhatri, Aged about 55 years, Training Superintendent presently posted in Industrial Training Institute, Gorela, Ditrict-Bilaspur (CG) Versus RESPONDENTS .^f^^p^^fc, ^l>\^fru& ^-o 1) State of Chhattisgarh - Through the Secretary, Higher Education,Technical Education, Manpower Planning 85 Science 8s Technology Department, DKS Bhavan, Raipur (CG). 2) The Deputy Secretary, Higher Education, Technical Education, Manpower Planning 8s Science 8s Technology Department, DKS Bhavan, Raipur (CG). 3) The Director, Employment 85 Training, State of Chhattisgarh, Byron Bazar, Raipur (CG). K. ••«!>. WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 ^3 ^IPIRBT, ESnily'IS, i««lll'My sn^i'qa Rt'li.'* •3IEW •BtlNi^ftg "^- f ^ fr; tiixctTai«)ra) 3n^r,'q=ra? .:...£JLl^fe^ T'"W;I. 2BO t^?T' sn^i'SRtiwo^ 20-1-2006 Shri P.R. Patahkar,Adv. fortl Shri Ramakant Mishra, Govt. The applicationfor urgent he; i-1eard. The grievance of the petition]er is that ignoring the case of the petiUoner, 5 persons have been promoted. Th lying vacant. He submitsthatthe p ^ee persons are alsoworking and one post is ^titioner is also entitled for promotion, but he has not been given promotion. H^ representations as per Annexure present the petitioner may be gji representation before the compete^ be considered on its own merits in Prayer is not opposed by the| Having considered and with|< the case, in the opinion ofthis Covlf is given to the petitioner to make a before the competent authority of| petition and this order, within <»l<<[<n<il-!IV^f •? ftt£t^F^R ,^ aiFgtt sn^i (e petitioner. ^dv.forthe.State. )ring is allowed. submits that the petitioner also submitted 5-7 dated 19-12-2005 and Annexure P-8 dated 5-1-2006, which has not beeln considered. He further submits that for the |iven an opportunity of filing the detailed itauthority of the respondents, which shall ccordance with law. State counsel. >ut expressing any opinion on the merits of rt, ends ofjustice will be served ifa direction letailed representation raising his grievances the respondents along with a copy of the three weeks from today, and on such representation being filed, the ccjmpetent authorityof.the respondente shail decide the.same on its own merit^ in accordance with law as early as possibie preferably withinthree months fron^the date ofreceiptofthe representation. Itis made clear that the if any grievajice still remains.the petition may avai! the remedy available under the law. With the aforesaid observatifins, this pet'rtion stands disposed of. Consequently M.W.P.No. 2. Certified copy as per rules. 1/2006 also stands disposed of. .J^f ^^