C.R. No.4032 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.4032 of 2010 Date of Decision: 01.07.2010 Balbir Singh @ Bhira .……Petitioner Versus Makhan Singh and another ……Respondents Coram:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL. Present: Mr. Deepak Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. L. N. MITTAL, J (ORAL) Balbir Singh @ Bhira-defendant No.2 has filed the instant revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing order dated 15.04.2010 Annexure P-4 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jalandhar, thereby accepting application moved by plaintiff-respondent No.1-Makhan Singh for secondary evidence of two postal receipts. Notices by registered post were allegedly sent by plaintiff to defendants i.e petitioner and respondent No.2. The postal receipts are said to have been misplaced and are not traceable, although photostat copies thereof are available. Accordingly, plaintiff was permitted to lead secondary evidence by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jalandhar. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that according to application Annexure P-2 moved for secondary evidence, the postal receipts were not traceable in the judicial file and, therefore, secondary evidence cannot be permitted. The contention cannot be accepted because it is mentioned in the C.R. No.4032 of 2010 -2- application Annexure P-2 that the postal receipts were also not traceable in the brief of the counsel for plaintiff-respondent No.1, although photostat copies thereof were available. In addition thereto, original registered envelops have been attached with the Court file by the plaintiff. In this view of the matter, the trial Court has rightly permitted the plaintiff to lead secondary evidence regarding the postal receipts. There is no infirmity much less illegality in the impugned order of the trial Court. The revision petition is completely bereft of any substance and is accordingly dismissed in limine. 01.07.2010 ( L. N. MITTAL ) A. Kaundal JUDGE