- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. CONTINUATION SHEET. CONTINUATION SHEET. CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.820 OF 2003 APPLICATION NO.820 OF 2003 APPLICATION NO.820 OF 2003 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.297 OF FROM ORDER NO.297 OF FROM ORDER NO.297 OF 2001 2001 2001 Dilipkumar Ramnihor Mishra ...Applicant vs. Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authorities ...Respondent CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : APRIL 15,2005. : APRIL 15,2005. : APRIL 15,2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The learned Advocate for the Applicant states that he has served the notice of this Application on the Advocate for the Respondent and the Advocate for the Appellant. He has placed on record a xerox copy of order dated 2nd December 2002 passed by the learned Trial Judge in Chamber Summons No.1524 of 2002 in S.C.Suit No.6481 by which the Applicant is directed to be impleaded as Defendant No.2 in the suit. As the applicant has been impleaded as party Defendant in the main suit, the application deserves to be granted. Accordingly, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The applicant will be impleaded as party Respondent No.2 in the Appeal from Order. 2. Place the Appeal for final hearing on 2nd May 2005 if it is ready in all respects. - 2 - JUDGE. JUDGE. JUDGE.