^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR S.B.: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR SINHA WRIT PETITION (Sl N0. 3992/2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 3. Tulsi Ram Gwal, S/o Shri Shankar Lal Gwal, 59 Yrs. Forestor, Posted at Asst. Range OfRce, South Bortalab, Distt. Rajnandgaon- (C.G.) VERSUS State.of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Forest Department, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) The Divisiona! Forest Officer, Forest Division, Khairagarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) The Asst. Range Officer, South Bortalab Range, Distt. Rajnandgaon- (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Mr. Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate for ths petitioner. Mr. R. Tripathi, Panel Lawyer for the State on advance copy. ORAL ORDER (02.08.2010) SUNILKUIVIARSINHA.J. Heard finally with the consent of the parties. Petitioner- Tulsi Ram Gwal is working on the post of Forester. By the impugned order dated 15.07.2010, he has been transferred from Van Mandal, Kheragarh to Van Mandal, Durg on administrative ground. Mr. Vinod Deshmukh, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner is goingto retire on 31st July, 2011. He submits that though a few days more than 1 year are left from the superannuation of the petitioner, the petitioner prays that as per poiicy of Government dated 22.06.2010, he should be posted in his home District or in a place of his option. His submission is that the petitioner has already obtained for Kheragarh and haa filed a representation for cancellation of order of his transfer. The copy of the representation has been filed as Annexure-P-5. Mr. Deshmukh submits that this petition may be disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh representation for canceilation of his order of transfer on the ground of superannuation in the month of July, 2011, and the authorities may be directed to dispose of t'ne representation in light of the contents of the poiicy dated 22.06.2010 and till then the transfer order dated 15.07.2010 be kept in abeyance. •;.?\ %. 'S-SSSSk % '"i<l iK3i S ^.^,/ •-X.it.t?^" WRiT PETIT10N (S) N0. 3992/2010 ,n~) The argument is opposed by the learned counsel for the State. Having heard learned counsei for the parties and having perused the records, 1 am of the opinion that present is a fit case to dispose of with the liberty to the petitioner to file a representation raising the above grievances and with a direction to the concerned authority to decide the same in accordance with law. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to file a representation within 15 days from today raising his grievances. If such a representation is fiied, the same shall be disposed of in accordance with law by the concerned authority. However, it is directed that till the representation is disposed of by the concerned authority, the transfer order dated 15.07.2010, so far it relates to the pefflioner, shall be kept in abeyance. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge