/ <7 @ magi 3.5mm x J IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(SNo. 3)éo Jmzom. .I/Meghnath ’Gayakwad, ' S/o. Shri late Shri Bali Ram Gayakvvad, aged about 55 yeans, Assistant Director, Education Departmerlft Kanker, District Kanker/(CJ G) VERSUS f :1.’ State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretaly, Education School Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) <~ n‘ , District Education Officer, Kanker, District Kanker (C. G.) Treasury Officer, Treasury Account and Pension, Kanker, District Kanker (C. G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner named above begs to submit as under:— PARTICULARS' OF THE PETITION As given‘ in the above cause title. ) . ER: ;\ : ‘HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Singl'e Bench: Hon’ble‘Shri Manindra Mo: an Shrivastava, J. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA Pren hri omkant Vm coun fr the ener. ri sar Payas Panel Lawyer t State est: :- }S S era, sel o ptitio {Sh Bhak hi. for he ORAL ORDER d “ Jl, 201) (Passe on 2" uy 0 Wit h ent o tie he $ or heg nn h te cons f the pats, t matter is ake‘n up f arin aiiy. 2 e peitoer was apoinds Asitteach a xed a of . ’ Th tin pte’a ssan-Ter on fi py R;-. ter comption of s bation he wgrand lr ay s.100’. Af le hi pro, aste regua p scale. . Leae cnsel ppi r the ptner submtSha he su 3 rnd ou aearng fo eitio iktt t ise invove te case is s o hh, the titionr is entitle o regua pay cal t efec fr t o initi ppointt or- after competon o se wih ft om he date f al amen li f roatio pe. pbn ‘ riod . ' Th involved rein wa csider bt Madha Pras Sate 4 e issue he s oned yhe y deh t dministtiv ribunal, Jalpur O.A.No.2745/8 ukant Yadu an 3 Arae T ba in 9 (Madh d 5 others V; State of M.P. & others), wherein it was heid that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale with effect'from the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon'b'le Supreme Court in specral Leave Petition (CiVil) No 6892/93 The said petition was dismissed by the Hon‘ble Supreme Court upholding the decrston of the Tribunal to the effect , that the Teachers/Assrstant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from the date of initial appointment .hx ’ ld in h a t weter pee d t lr k WRIT PETmDN (S) No.31 60!2010 1 PETITioNER L Méghnath Gayakwfad { Versus RESPCNDEMS State of ChhamsgJrh and others > 5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further $ubmlts that MS» Court whHe con$idermg the same Issue In Amar S IRam & Gthers v Stafe of Chhattisgarh & Others (W.P.(S) No.4725z’2006) by order dated O1r’O9/2006, allowed the pEtitioners to make a representatien within a period of ten daye, raismg a” their gnevanees t 6. Accordgngly, the petttxone: Is granted hberty to make a representation 1 ralsmg a" his grievance In light of the aforesaid judgment and the Circular dated 13 01 -2009 (Annexure P Q and in turn the concerned respondent is directed to deCide the representation. if any, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, subject to verification of the facts. 7. In View of the foregorng. this petition is disposed off No order as to cts os. ~ Manra Mo hastave judge t t... Tumane ~* / w~ Sd, ind nan Qrw