iN'THEMlGMGOURTO^CMHAn-ISGARHAT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.^3'' /2006 PETITIONER ••~\ .^' \^.:.:^yy *•* dfc ,'"11<^" -^' .o-' fS'~ %»'"' RESPQNDENTS ^^ ^y Ku.SushilaVerma -/ D/oShri Bhoj RamVerma, Age about 36 years, Asstt.Teacher, Govt. PrimarySchool, Kharora, Block - Tilda, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh. Through: Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer Raipur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Petitioner most humbly submit as under:- HI6H COURT OF CHI-IATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR ^' s< Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitiorier Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents W. P. (5) No. 5623 of 2006 Smt. Ishwari Pandey Versus State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh A another W. P. (S) No. 5624 of 2006 Ku. Sushila Verma Versus State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh & another W. P. (5) No. 562S of 2006 Ku. Shdhena Parveen Versus State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh &. another W. P. (5)No. 5626 of 2006 Rajendra Prasad Soni Versus Sta+e 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh 4 another W. P. (S) No. 5627 of 2006 Tok Singh Verma Versus State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh & another W. P. (5) No. 5628 of 2006 Ramgopat Chaturvedi Versus State ©ovt.of Chhattisgarh & another W. P. (5) No. 5629 of 2006 Smt. Sandhya Sharma Versus Stdte 6ovt. of Qihattisgarh <S onother W. P. (S'! No. 5630 of 2006 Rakesh Kumar Sahu Versus State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh & another W. P. (5) No. 5631 of 2006 Versus Lakhan Lal Patel 5+ate 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh & onother ~-f Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents W.P. (5) No. 5632 of2006 Ku. Jeera Padhyay Versiis State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh & another And W. P. (51 No. 5633 of 2006 Sagar Ram Dahariya Versus State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh & ono+her ^/' Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. Shri Ajay Shrivastnva, Advocate for the Petitioners. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. Advocate for respondents/State. OR&ER >th (13th October. 2006) 1. . Leamed counsel ospipeor'mq for the petitioners submits that while working as Assistont Teachers.the petitioners have gone on training to improve 1+ieir qualifications on their own expenses and acquired B. Ed./B.T.I. Examination Certificate. "^h 2. The present writ petitions, being W.P.(5) Nos. 5623/2006, 5624/2006,5625/2006,5626/2006,5627/2006,5628/2006, 5629/2006, 5630/2006, 5631/2006, 5632/2006 and 5633/2006 involve similar facts and common question of law. Thus, these petitions are being disposed of by this common order. 3. According to learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners are entitled to two advmce increments in view of the decision of -rfiis Court in the ca^ of Yashwant Kumar -4:- Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg ond another {2006 CII) MPJR-C6 96}. This Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipa! Corporation, Ourg and another (Supra), came to the conciusion that the teachers, who had obtained B.Ed./B.T.I. Examination Certificate on his own expenses, are covered by the circular datsd 24.12.98 issued by the State Government of Madhya Pradesh. 4. Leamed counsel for +he petitioners further submits that the facts ond question of law involved in the present cases are squarety covered by decision of this Court in the case of Yctshwont Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, t)urg and another (Supra), to which leamed counsel appearing for •riie respondents fairly concedes ond agrees with the averment made by learned counset appearing for the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the writ petitions are allowed in terms of the order passed m the case of Ycishwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to yenfication of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.T-I. Examination Certificate on their own expenses or not. No order as to costs. 6. A copy of this order be ptaced on record of other connected writ petitions. Subhash Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge