3 CD ;a IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, AT BILASPUR (C.G.) Writ Petitfon No. '^7^0 /2005 PETITIONER Smt. Ranjana Patel W/o Shri Basant Kum.ar Patel aged about 20 years Shiksha Karmi Varg 3 Primary School Kurankapa Teh. Mungeli Distt. Bilaspur VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^f\ Collector Bilaspur Distt. Bilaspur '• C.G. ^2] The C.E.O. Janpat Panchayat Mungeli Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) ^--"State of Chhattisgarh y WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. B'"' .:,aifw^..wg'-^-'l*;t • HWV91WW \JTre| ^iWMii, U>-ri1'<-l<l<o, fiwi'dgX i^f ^r^o/o.) 3II^?TW-R-li«h; cWTsn^sfipim SP/FS/2005-20,000.- 3fI^?T q^? ('i^g^) W^200 > 4^^n/?<;uu Shri Diriesh R.K.Tiw Shri Arun Sao, &y. Heard. By way of this writ Constitution df India, th ^overnment Advocate for' the State. mpugned show cause ncjtice dated 10.8.2005 issued by Collector, counsei fo was appointed as Shiksl thereafter', the petitiom since then she is workin< Coliector, Bihspur, nli of petitioner and caiied'upoi The fupther con+er that the ser'vices of the ,Vi.P.(C.6.). Panchayat Shi Service) Rufes, 1997 and| appeijate authorit)', therj <ni<ilffl<l1i *fiinT^'ls'<3 <[ui'K;it ^sil^Tail^T the oetitioner. petition, filed under Article 2i '6/227 petitioner has, challenaei legalit/ of ne DetiTioner |a K.arm Grade-TTL in B!ock Mungeli vide 4.6.2005. He further submit3 that r joined in her respective Institution and |an the said post in the'said Institution. The |a sudden jssued a show cause notice to the :r to file her reply on 22.8.2005 af 11.00 s tion of learned counsel for the petitioner is fcetitioner are governed by the Provisions of (ssha Karmi (Recruitment and Condi'tion of in n id rules, thi ot notjce ti n\ v cause by •J yCTi^iAiiri^, »Til<ti<t<»,ficti'<ia<< HWWW^T^ snisTwR-li*^ amsii^^TiPWP sn^srqaq? (yilg'si.s) W?[.200 the Coilec+or:is not in quashed. ! The law in rela't interfer'ence by writ COLJI flled. The: Higl' show cause, issued unlessl or the sarne has been i; over the matter. :ven in such situatl is challenged, it has bee^ shouid reach to the cuthol jurisdiction and the authi an appropriate order' on tE been heid in the matter o unless tne HiQh Cour't is totally non est in the eye the author'ity to even invi be en+ertained for the n the wr'it petitioner shou snow cause naTice ans Whether the show cause 'lilOfcKil'-l *fl4ri)'^ffe'<!l xluit^ll ^ail^Tail^si ice wirn TO Tilin< same sh.ould be rhe writ is noT required To inTerrere etition and is now we!l a muTTer oT 'h the Rules the same is not in comor'm(t>/ ;ued by the authority haying no jurisdiction pn whether the jurisdiction of the authorit)' suggested that first' of all the petitioner 'ity-and file a reply ./ objection regarding his irity should be giyen an opportunity to pas'.s |e objection raisecl by the petitioner. It 'nas _^f Th ,.-/ reported in JT 2004 (1) 5C page 206 that satlsfied that the sHow couse notice was |of law for "absolute" want of jurisdiction of [stigate into facts, writ petitions should not |ere asking and as a matter of routine, and (I invariably be directed +o respond to the |e all stands highlighted in the writ pstition. leqal oremises is a toTice was Tou' ^D &f> XI-HC-78 \di.ri"yi«irt^,yni'd'ld, Rcil'<iy'< *ti*irti^*nq» an^STqa^ (^l'jd.Ei) W^ 200 an^T?ir R-ti* ?TaiT3II$?Trt>*f SCTtSR«ftdSI^V <ni«(i»<Ili*iiinT*t"ls'<il '<lui'«;i't 2|T3|R1<13II^?T 'IE; -M '•I'yV •' jurisdictiona! issue which can eve(i be ur'ged by the recipient ve.ry notice initialiy, the aggrii sved could OT me ity issuing :roach the iince the counsei could ni ly non est in the eye of law fo !• inclined to entertain 1+iis 'ice issued to the The petition is dismissed. However, liberty is granted t sgtisfy that the show cciuse w&s wont of absolute jurisdiction, I am t Detiti ifore the concerned authority Q! se ground of jurisdiction and if irisdiction is raised by the peti1 he .-natter l.n accoraance with I^ The petition stands finally i^i In v'iew of this flrder, AA.W| disDosed of. Certified copy as per rules. \h's stage. |to the petitioner that if the matter ^erned authorit)-', shs may appear her repiy. She may also raise a repiy is filed and gro.und of oner, the competent authority' shall jrisdiction and thereafter, proceed !W. isposed of. P.No.3689/2005.1.A.No.8213/2005 Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge