MC 2386/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. GN Sahewalla, learned senior counsel for the petitioner as wel l as Mr. Surana, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. The petitioner, by the present petition, is praying for an order of inju nction restraining the opposite party No. 3, who is the respondent No. 3 in the appeal, from making any construction over the suit land and/or from changing the nature and character of the suit land and also restraining the opposite party N o. 3 from transferring the suit land to anybody else, contending that there is a move in that respect by the opposite party No. 3. Though no affidavit-in-opposition has been filed by the respondents, Mr. Surana, learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties, including the oppos ite party No. 3, has submitted that there is no move for transferring the suit l and to anybody and also to make any construction. It has also been submitted tha t the nature and character of the suit land would also not be changed. However, minor repairing may be allowed to be done by the opposite party No. 3 on the exi sting structures. Having considered the averments made in the application as well as the s ubmissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, the present application is disposed of with the direction to the opposite party No. 3 not to raise any c onstruction over the suit land and/or change the character of the suit land. The said opposite party is also restrained from transferring the suit land to anybo dy. The opposite party No. 3 is, however, permitted to make the minor repair ing on the existing structures including repairing of the roof of the existing s tructures. The Misc. case is accordingly disposed of.