IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18437 of 2010 GOBIND KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR 4 15.7.2010 KHAN Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under sections 420, 392,395 and 412 of the Penal Code. It is alleged by the informant that she was called from Bangalore on the pretext of being awarded documentary film on Railways. In the process, the informant reached Patna where the accused persons cheated her of a sum of Rs.2.50 lacs and looted a mobile as well as that of her Associates. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that neither the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. nor he has been put on T.I.Parade. Nothing incriminating articles has been recovered from his possession. The petitioner is in custody since 21.5.2009. Counsel for the State submits that IMEI number of the mobile set of the informant tallied with the IMEI number of the petitioner’s mobile. He further submits that the petitioner is involved in another case of similar nature. Having considered the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. His prayer for bail is rejected. However, he may renew his prayer for bail after seven months. (S.P.Singh,J) 2