IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13736 of 2011 1. Ram Laddu Rai S/O Late Saryug Rai R/O Vill.- Karnauti, P.S- Mahnar, Distt.- Vaishali 2. Ram Chhabila Rai S/O Late Ram Lakhan Rai R/O Vill.- Karnauti, P.S- Mahnar, Distt.- Vaishali ---Petitioners. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Collector, Vaishali 3. The Circle Officer, Mahnar, Distt.- Vaishali ---Respondents. ---------------------------------- 07 13.12.2011 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned Assistant Counsel to Government Advocate no. 2 is present. Heard. Petitioners raise a grievance with respect to order dated 13.8.2010 passed by the respondent Collector, Vaishali in Misc. case no. 105/2004-05 ( Ram Lakhan Rai and Anr. vs. State of Bihar ) as contained in Annexure-3 whereby objection filed on their behalf under Section 5A of the Bihar Land Acquisition Act (for short ‘the Act’) was considered and rejected. The objection was filed in respect of khata no. 259, Khesra no. 2858 measuring an area of 2.5 decimals and Khesra no. 2880 measuring an area of 2.5 decimals situated in village Karnauti in the District of Vaishali. Counter affidavit as well as supplementary counter affidavit have been filed on behalf of the respondent State. In the counter affidavit the respondents have averred that the Acquisition Case no. 105 of 2004-05 for proposed acquisition has now become infructuous. It is contended that a fresh acquisition proceeding being Land Acquisition case no. 15 of 2007-08 has now been initiated in which besides others 0.1 decimals of land appertaining to revisional Survey Plot no. 2864 belonging to petitioners are the subject matter of acquisition. In the supplementary counter affidavit, it has been contended that petitioners did not file any objection thereto under Section 5A of the Act. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant any relief to the petitioners by invoking its extraordinary and discretionary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. In fact, the petitioners have no objection to the proposed acquisition of 0.1 decimals of land belonging to them since they did not prefer any objection under Section 5A of the Act. The application is dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)