REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.2904 of 2007 1 .. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.2904 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision : March 18, 2008 Harbhajan Singh alias Bhajan Singh .. Appellant v. Tej Kaur and others .. Respondents CORAM : Hon`ble Mr. Justice Pritam Pal Present : Shri Jasmeet Singh Bhatia, Advocate, for the appellant. PRITAM PAL, J . This Regular Second Appeal by plaintiff-Harbhajan Singh alias Bhajan Singh (hereinafter referred to as “the appellant) is directed against judgment and decree dated 2.5.2005 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Phagwara, whereby, a suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendant-respondents (hereinafter referred to as “the respondents”) from interfering in the proper use of tubewell installed in khasra No. 814, was dismissed. Thereafter, first appeal filed by the appellant was also dismissed by learned Additional District Judge, Kapurthala, vide judgment and decree dated 18-4-2007. This is how feeling aggrieved, the appellant- plaintiff has come up in this Regular Second Appeal. After hearing learned counsel for the appellant and going REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.2904 of 2007 2 .. through the impugned judgments and decrees, it is apparent that both the courts below have given concurrent findings regarding the ownership and possession of khasra No. 814 in favour of the defendant-respondents. The tube-well in question is also installed in this aforesaid khasra number. There are also concurrent findings of the courts below that the appellant has no right, title or interest in the aforesaid khasra number and the tube-well installed therein. The findings arrived at by the courts below are not perverse or unreasonable in any manner. More so, learned counsel for the appellant also could not make out any substantial question of law involved in this appeal for consideration by this Court. Hence, this Regular Second Appeal is dismissed in limine. [ PRITAM PAL ] March 18, 2008 JUDGE som