@ CD $ingle Bench 1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.(S)No. UIZ‘H/ OF 2011(s.B.). / (’gMMISs, x§ / ’. \ o4 /,. S / \‘32 3. Block Education Officer, {’g ‘ SJ. k) u.’ if) Saja, Distt. Durg (C. G.) “I M 4. Treasury Officer, Treasury Account and Pension, Durg, Distt. Durg (C. G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF' INDIA 4,, ‘/ The petitioner begs to submit as under:— v\ 4y m PETITIONER / : Ram Kumar Sharma, S/o. late Shri Mang_tu Prasad, aged about 55 years, Head awd é w Master, Govt. Boys Higher Secondary School Saja, District {R .we‘wé‘“ m ? L Durg (C. G.) &5‘yeé t: V E R S U S i RESPONDENTS. :KV State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, School Education D‘epartment, l r D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) 2. “District Education Officer, Educational District Bemetara, Distt. Durg (C. G.) mm @Q wfcmwnwn n 200 mm (Wu) mmm mm wm ‘3u‘3i13w611’h1 8.3 ' HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKER 03.08.201 1 msel for the petitioner. the State. r in the present petition is that Deputy Teacher on a axed pay two years and after completion lar pay scale ofRs. 169—300. Shri Somkant Verma, cm Shri N.Naha Roy, P.L. for Grievance of the Imtitiom the pe1itioner was appointed a: scale of Rs. 150 for a period of of probation, he was granted re Contention of the couns 1 for the petitioner is that he is entitled for regular pay scale th effect nonr the date of initial appointment and his case is s uarely covered with number of decisions passed by this Court d also the judgment rendered by the M.P. State Administrativ Tribunai, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 27’45/89 (Madhukant Yadu & Others) where in it has teachers are entitled for regular initial appoinnnent. It is not disputed by bot the parties that the matter was taken up by the State to the also dismissed by the Apex Cot Tribunal to the eiTect that the "I entitled for regular pay scale appointment. 56 Others Vs. State of M.P. en held that similarly placed pay scale from the date of their pex Court but the appeal was Lrt upholding the decision of the eachers/ Assistant Teachers are horn the date of their initial @ mm m 200 mm (Wu) mamfzwia? ammm WWM fs‘2‘tm mafsam *Wm 1n View of the above suhmission madc by the counsél for the paxu'es, the pen'u'on is disposed of in the same terms Le, the petitioner is granted liber‘y to make a representation, if so advised, in the light of the afc resaid judgment and the Cimular dated 5.1.2011 (Annexure P 6) and in tum, the concerned respondent is dimcted to con ider their case on its own merits and in §its perspective. If th petitioner stands on the same footing as per order_pass by the State Administrative Tribunal in Madhukant Y du (supra) and subsequently confirmed by the Supreme ourt in Special Leave Petition (Civil) NO. 6892/93 by 0rd dated 03.01.95, the petitioner may be entitled to same relief ccordingly. 1t is expected from the tate authorities to pass suitable order after due scrutiny of th facts. lt is made clear that ‘s court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the ase and the authority concerned would be at liberty to deci e the representation strictly in accordance with law. . . Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge