1 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5444/2007 Chhotu Ram v. Surja Ram & Ors. Date of Order :: 29th August, 2007 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. M.S.Purohit, for the petitioner. .... By this petition for writ validity, propriety and correctness of the order dated 17.7.2007 passed by learned Board of Revenue for Rajasthan, Ajmer in Revision I.D.No.5215/07/T.A./Bikaner is questioned. By the order aforesaid learned Board of Revenue held that the revision petition preferred under Section 230 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act by the petitioner is not maintainable in view of the fact that the order dated 1.3.2007 passed by the court subordinate was of interim nature. In brief, facts of the case are that the petitioner preferred an application under Section 212 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act before the Sub Divisional Officer, Bikaner alongwith a suit preferred under Sections 53, 88 and 188 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act. The subordinate court at first instance passed an exparte interim order in favour of the petitioner but the same was not extended after 1.3.2007. The 2 petitioner being aggrieved by non-extension of interim order, preferred the revision petition before the Board of Revenue that came to be rejected under the order impugned. The contention of counsel for the petitioner is that the Board of Revenue committed an error apparent on the face of record while holding the order dated 1.3.2007 as an interim order. According to learned counsel the order dated 1.3.2007 was final order as on that day the exparte interim order passed earlier was not further extended. I do not find any substance in the contention so raised. It is not in dispute that the application under Section 212 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act is still pending before the subordinate court and on 1.3.2007 the interim order was not extended looking to the fact that the petitioner was getting the matter prolonged by seeking unwarranted adjournments in the matter. I do not find any error in the order impugned that may warrant interference of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, this petition for writ is dismissed. ( GOVIND MATHUR ),J. Kkm/ps.