HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.2175 of 2009 Date : 27-9-2011 Between : Sabavat Rukman Naik .. Petitioner And The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Represented by its Special Officer-cum-Commissioner, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Sri B. Sudhakar Reddy Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3 : Dr. Y. Padmavathi Counsel for respondent No.4 : A.G.P. for Revenue Counsel for respondent Nos.5 & 6 : Sri G. Madhusudan Reddy The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus to set-aside letter No.13/TP/MCH/CX/04-06 dated 18-10-2007 of respondent No.3. A perusal of the record shows that when the petitioner approached respondent No.3 for action against the constructions made by respondent No.7 in deviation of the sanctioned plan, respondent No.3 has replied that since there are several cases pending in various courts, action will be taken after disposal of the cases, including the land grabbing case. In the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 it is inter alia stated that on the applications made by the owners of the flats which were constructed by respondent No.7 and sold, the constructions were regularized under the Building Penalisation Scheme. In support of this averment, copies of orders regularizing the constructions have been filed. Sri B. Sudhakar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner has not disputed this position. Inasmuch as the constructions have been regularized, no mandamus can be issued to take action against the alleged illegal structures. If the petitioner feels aggrieved by the orders of regularization, he shall be free to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law. Subject to the above liberty, the Writ Petition is dismissed. As a sequel, WPMP No.2757/2009 is disposed of as infructuous. ________________________ Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy Date : 27-9-2011 AM