HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA8PUR WRIT PETmON (S) No. 4525 of2010 PETITIONER : TarunKumarMeshram. RESPONDENTS VERSU8 State ofChhattisgarh & Ofhers. WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTtCLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OFINDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aeirihotri, J. Present: Shri D.N.Prajapati, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyerfortihe StaWrespondent No.lto3. None for fhe respondent No. 4, despite service oftiotiee. 0»DE»CORAL) (Passed on 12m day ofjuly, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel app^aring for fhe State/responderit No. 1 to 3 ^ suhmits fhat fhe petitioner has already ccmtmued at the <mgitsal place ofposting for almost 1 1 months on accouflt ofinterim order granted by fhis Court 16.08.2010. The State/re^ondent No. 1 to 3 may be granted liberty to pass appropriate orders keeping m view public interest and adminislrative exigency. Shri Thakur further submite tfiat fhe State/respondent No. 1 to 3 ^hiall not insist upon compliance of fhe impugned order dated and 06.08.2010 (Annexure P/l) in respect offhe petition^r. 2, M fhis stage, when no effect could be given to the impugned order dated 06.08.2010 (Amiexure P/l) on account ofthe iateriim order dated 16.08.2010, thus, it is not necessary to go into legality and validity offhe aforestated impugned orders. 3. In view ofthe above., aacording to leamed couxisel appearmg for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, fhe petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge