BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Sixth day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.11153 of 2011 V.THULASI @ RAMAKRISHNAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ECONOMIC OFFENCES WING - II, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.7/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT FOR PETITIONER : M/S.KATHIVELU SENIOR COUNSEL FOR MR.M.VINOTHSINGHMISRA ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT : MR.A.RAMAR GOVT. ADVOCATE ( CRL. SIDE) PETITION FOR BAIL UNDER SEC. 439 CR.P.C. ORDER : THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER :- The petitioner is arrayed as A1 and he was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 04.08.2011 for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 420, 409, 120(b) I.P.C. and Section 5 of TNPID Act, 1997, in Crime No.7 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by one Lyla @ Shanthi, a case has been registered in Crime No.7 of 2011 under Sections 420, 409, 120(b) I.P.C. and Section 5 of TNPID Act, 1997. He further submitted that the petitioner has already paid the dispute amount of Rs.47,000/-(Rupees Forty Seven Thousand only) to the defacto complainant on 24.08.2011 and hence, he prays for enlargement on bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the amount involved is only Rs.47,000/-(Rupees Forty Seven Thousand only), however, they are expecting more complaint and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and on perusal of an additional typed set of papers filed by the petitioner, which shown that on 24.08.2011 the defacto complainant sent a letter to the Deputy Superintendent of Police (EOW), Nagercoil, in that letter, the defacto complainant herself stated that she has received a sum of Rs.47,000/-(Rupees Forty Seven Thousand only) from the petitioner. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and also considering the fact that the dispute amount has already been paid by the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioner, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, TNPID Court, Madurai and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. sd/- 26/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE SPECIAL JUDGE, TNPID COURT, MADURAI. 2 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ECONOMIC OFFENCES WING - II, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC to M/S.M.VINOTHSINGHMISRA Advocate SR.No.29241. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11153 of 2011 Date :26/08/2011 2P/6C RPB 26.08.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/