IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP. No.4186 of 2010.. Date of Decision:7.9.2010.. _______________________________________________ Bhagyawati. ….Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. ….Respondents. Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge. Whether approved for reporting1? No. For the petitioner :Mr. T. S. Chauhan, Advocate. For Respondents 1&2. :Mr.P.K.Sharma, Addl. Advocate General. For Respondent No.4 Mr. Rajiv Rai, Advocate. Dev Darshan Sud, J.(Oral). Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that by an order of a Division Bench of this Court passed in CWP. No. 2 of 2009 titled Smt. Neelam Kumari Vs. State of H.P. and others, directions were issued by this Court for the purposes of determination of income of the eligible Anganwadi Workers/Helpers. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4 submits that the general principle of law as laid down in Whether reporters of the Local papers are allowed to see the judgment? yes. 2 Neelam Kumari’s case is not applicable to the facts of the present case as the husband of the petitioner is running a shop under the name and style of M/s Bhagya Enterprises, Main Chowk, Namhol, Bilaspur, H.P. whose proprietor is Lekh Ram. Not only this, he has four telephone numbers functioning at his business/residence. He has also relied upon a certificate issued by the ‘Namohol Trade Mandal’ stating that the husband of the petitioner is running the shop in question. In these circumstances, he submits that it is not possible that the family is surviving only on income of Rs.8000/- per month. A directions is issued to the Divisional Commissioner to re-consider the case of the petitioner afresh taking into consideration both Annexures:R-4/4 and Annexure:R-4/5 as filed in this petition including any other material which the parties wish to adduce before him for the determination of their respective rights. In case the Divisional Commissioner comes to the conclusion that the petitioner is playing hide and seek, an exemplary costs of Rs. 10,000/- shall be imposed upon her. The case shall be disposed of within a period of four weeks from the day when this orders first presented by the parties. The petition is accordingly disposed of. (Dev Darshan Sud), Judge. September 7, 2010(R) 3