IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 10558 of 2007 Between: T.Y. Sree Sudha D/o T.Y. Viswarupa chari R/o Srinivasanagar, SVB, Narsing Home, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Dr. NTR. University of Health Science, rep byits Registrar, Vijayawada. 2 The Medical Health and FamilyWelfare Departmetn, rep byits Secrtary, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 3 Nrarayana Medical College, repbyits Principal, Chintareddy Palem, NelloreDistrict. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not condoning the shortage of 0.7% in Pharmacology subject even though the respondents have the power to condone the shortage upto 10 % as illegal, unwarranted and violatie of Article 19 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to allow the petitioner to Writ the examination in the subject of pharmacology in the2nd year MBBS which will be commenced from 16-05-07 by condoning the shortage of attendance and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.RATHANGA PANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.D.V.NAGARJUNA BABU The Court made the following : ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in view of the interim orders granted pending the writ petition, no further orders are necessary. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ___________ G. ROHINI, J Date:01.05.2009 sj