THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.403 OF 2011 16.09.2011 Between: Dhanikonda Nageswara Rao …Petitioner AND Tsaliki Gangaraju And others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.403 OF 2011 ORDER: The petitioner is third party to E.P.No.126 of 2004 in O.S.No.39 of 2004 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Peddapuram. He filed E.A.No.171 of 2009 under Order XXI Rule 97 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. In the enquiry, the petitioner was examined as P.W.1 and Exs.A.1 to A.4 were marked on 02.02.2011. It is alleged that even though the petitioner wanted to examine other witnesses, the matter was posted for orders on 07.02.2011. Aggrieved by the same, the present civil revision petition is filed. When the matter was listed on 11.02.2011, this Court passed the following order. Notice before admission. Pending further orders, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file an application before the Court of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Peddapuram, setting out a time schedule, within a period of seven (7) days from today for producing his oral and documentary evidence. He shall also place on record in support of E.A.No.71 of 2009 in E.P.No.126 of 2004 in O.S.No.39 of 2004, all oral and documentary evidence within a period of thirty (30) days from today and subject to relevancy, the same be considered by the Court below. E.A.No.171 of 2009 shall be disposed of within a period of three (3) months from today. The further proceedings in E.P.No.126 of 2004 in O.S.No.39 of 2004 are stayed till the disposal of E.A.No.171 of 2009 and subject to the application of the revision petitioner to lead his evidence within the time stipulated herein. Notice. The learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to take out personal notice on the respondent by registered post acknowledgement due returnable within a period of three weeks. List the revision after four weeks. The counsel for petitioner Sri P.Govind Reddy submits that pursuant to the order of this Court as above, the petitioner was permitted to adduce evidence and thereafter, the E.A., itself was dismissed. In that view of the matter, no adjudication is required in this revision petition and it is not necessary to decide other issues. The civil revision petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 16.09.2011 Pln