"^x '•..• ^ "'^ ..--"--x ^ ^^ y ^.. ^—^ A ^^s. \." .-%•' &" @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR RBVIEW PfiTlTION N0. 29 OF 2011 Petitioaers Plaintiff/Land Lords Versus Resoondent Defendant/Tenant 1. 2. Smt Ratoi Bai Wd/o Premchaad Jain, aged about 62 years, Maaager aad Karta Prenichand faimly. (smce deceased, fhereforc an appUcation for deleting her name has been inade separately). Shri Laxmichaad S/o KirodUal Jain aged 60 years, Manager Evam Katra Karode Lal FamUy. Smt. Kasturi Bai Wd/o Sheelchand Jaia aged 54 years, Manager Evam Karta Sheelchand fainUy, Firm Karode Lal Premchand Akaltara Through Partner Kasturi Bai Wd/o Sheelchand. (AU residents of Akaltara, Talisil Jaajgir, Distorict Bilaspur (Now Janjgir Chanipa). Had Prasad Agrawal (siace deceased) fhrough fhe LR Ashok Kumar Agrawal, R/o Akaltara, Talisil Janjgir, District Jaajgir-Chamipa RBVIEW PEITION UNDmi ORDER 47 RULB 1. CODB OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908. (SB :Hon*ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:- Shri Saajay Shyam Agrawal, Advocate for the petitioners. Respondent not noticed* ORAL- ORDBR (Passedon 06/04/2011} Prsent review petitiou has been preferred afker 90 days ofits Kmitation. Heard on I,A. No. 1 an appMcation under Section 5, Limitation Act for condonation of delay in filmg fhe rcview petition aad also heard on inerits. This is petition for review offhe judgment and decree dated 8/l1/2010 passed by this Court ia S.A. No. 286/2001. ^-•" ^^ S ,;<" -;y ..^" ^^ -^— 5. r ' ,• . 6: 4. Learaed counsel for the petitioners submita that 3 cases were consoUdated by the order of fhe trial Court aad evidenae was rccorded ia one case same has been used ia aU cases, This fact has aot beeii brought iato ttie rccord at fhe time of hearing of second appeal fhereforc order remaiiding fhe case has been passed, Judgment, copy of fhe order-sheet of fhe trial Court and capy of cme appUcation for consoUdatlon 3 cases penised, Qrder dated 22/9/85 aad previous order reveal that appUcation Order 6 Rule 17 of ftie C.P.C. has been aUowed vide order dated 20/9/85. Copy of fhe order filed on behalf of fhe petitioners do not show fhe order of consoHdation of 3 cases, I do not find any ground for rcview. Consequenfly, I.A. No. 1 is dismissed ajad review petition is also dismissed, No order as to costs. ^ T.P. Sharma Judge -/'