IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1445 of 2010 1. CHANDER DHRUB ROY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS. 2. BIJAY KUMAR ROY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. 3. AJAY KUMAR ROY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, ALL SONS OF LATE HARICHARAN ROY AND ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NAYA TOLA PHULWARISHARIF, PHULWARISHARIF, P.S. PHULWARISHARIF, DISTRICT- PATNA:---PETITIONERS. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. SRI HEMANT KUMAR, CIRCLE OFFICER PHULWARISHARIF, DISTRICT- PATNA. 3. SRI AMIR CHANDER ROY, SON OF LATE DEOCHAND ROY OF NAYA TOLA, PHULWARISHARIF, PATNA :---OPP.PARTIES. ----------- 4. 18.04.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. In compliance of my order dated 15.04.2011 records of the mutation case has been produced wherefrom it appears that on 13.08.2010 request of the petitioner for mutation of the lands-in- question was rejected for his failure to produce the genealogy and the documents to substantiate his claim of possession. By filing show-cause dated 20.08.2010 Opposite Party No. 2 has informed this Court that the claim of the petitioner for mutation has not been rejected on merit, as such, may still be considered after the genealogy and the document in support of his possession over the lands-in-question are produced as under the earlier order dated 13.08.2010 the claim was not rejected on merit. From the two show-cause filed on 20.08.2010 and 15.04.2011 I am satisfied that there is no discrepancy in the two show- cause, as such, there is no occasion for me to proceed with the contempt petition, which is, accordingly, disposed of. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)