IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) W. P. NOf3X75 OF 2003 / PETITIONER S.K. S. Gaharwar, S/o Late ,§:$ $ Shri about D. 48Years, S. Gahalwar, Occupatlon aged Service - presently working as Veterinary Assistant Surgeon posted at R. V. O. Govt. Veterinaly Hospital, Bilaspur [Chhatisgarh] VERSUS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI MANDAMUS PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. ORDER OR ORDERS: . § 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Agriculture 85Veterinary, Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, v’ Rajpur [Chhattisgarh] 2. Dr. Sharad Keshwarwani Veterinary Assistant Surgeon, Government Veterinary Hospital, Raigarh [Chhatisgarh] XI-HC—22 17.10.2003 counsel for the petiu'oner. Shri Manm'dra Shrivastava, Shri Sanjay K Agama], D1 r. Adv. General takes notice for respondent no. 1. By this petition under Artiele 226 of Cons1itution of India, the order-dated 25.09.2003 by the petitioner seeks to challenge which the petin'oncr has been transfened &om Bilaspur to Raigarh. The petitioner is war-Eng as Veterm'axy AssistantSutgeon in Government Hospital, Bilas‘ pur. Lemned counsel for the petiu‘oner submiw that the dang] / in gags 11¢ at Bilaspur and the in the mid academic Session. Th that the pe&tioner may be allowe d to make representah‘on to the respondent no.1. counsel for the parties and Havmg heard the learnec. cucumstances of the cm, the havmgregaxdtothefactsand petitionerisallowedtomakem presentanon to the respondent no. 1 within ten days raising all his grievances and di$oulties and 1ter of the petitioner is studying petih‘cner has been uansfened :mfore, learned counsel submits [aleW ’1._ same in an objeciive manna- an period of another thirty days. Til the petitioner should not be teHevcd, if he has not ahmdy been mlieved. With the above obsmvaiic stands disposed of. Consequently, M.W.P. No. %97[2w3 & LA. No.9345/2003 also stands disposed of. Cellm‘ed oopyas permits ‘ Sd/- L.C.BHADO° ' rz i: Judge [@éfiai k x d pass a teasoned older within a 1 the decision of lespondent no. 1, >n and direction, the w1it peu'n'on X1-HC-22 WW éZQ " mmwe’.m. Wt 2003 mg WW s fsQ?W mmmma as m am respondent no.1 shall consider his representation and‘decide the