IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.261 of 2009 JANKI DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3. 7.9.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. On the own showing of the petitioner from her pleadings she has been ousted from what she claims are tenanted premises by the acts of the private respondent nos. 5 to 9. The Court therefore finds the present not to be a case of forceful dispossession by the State authority warranting interference in the writ jurisdiction. In that view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for leave to withdraw the application to enable her to pursue her remedy under the general Civil law for restitution of her lease hold property. The writ application is permitted to be withdrawn to avail the alternative remedy. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)