1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.680 OF 2009 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.3411 OF 2007 State Bank of India ....Plaintiff V/s. Dayanand G. Pawar ....Defendant WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.681 OF 2009 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.3411 OF 2007 State Bank of India ....Plaintiff V/s. Madhukar B. Jadhav & Anr. ....Defendants WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.683 OF 2009 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.1797 OF 2007 State Bank of India ....Plaintiff V/s. Kishore H. Naik & Anr. ....Defendants WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.684 OF 2009 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.3413 OF 2007 State Bank of India ....Plaintiff V/s. Rajkumar E. Bhosale & Anr. ....Defendants Mr.A.J. Almeida i/b Mr.D.R. Tare for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants. 2 CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 17TH DECEMBER, 2009. P.C. :- 1. The suits were dismissed for default on the part of the advocate as stated in the affidavit in support. Even the delay on the part of the advocate requires to be condoned in view of what is stated in the affidavit in support. It was on account of his other professional commitment. 2. In the circumstances, all the above Notices of Motion are made absolute in terms of prayers (a) and (b). The objections shall be removed on or before 31.1.2010. 3. All the above Notices of Motion are accordingly disposed of.