ofwp @ $5mg¥a Eamh PETITIONER: 1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION ( C ) No. mm 0f 201 1 Smt. Teja‘ Kurre W/o Shri Artidas Kurre, aged about 42 years, Ex. Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Paraswani(k) R/ o Village Paraswani, P.S. Bhatapara (Rural) , Tahsil Bhatapara, District Raipur (CG) . Versus 1,. r‘The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development Department, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). RESPONDENTS: WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA / 2. The Sub Divisional Officer (R)& Prescribed Authority (Panchayat), Bhatapara, (r District Raipur (CG). 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Bhatapara, District Raipur (CG). H5GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : B!LASPUR\ WRkT PETITION (C) NO. 4294 OF 2033 $mt. Teia Kurre Veysus The State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of india) $ingie Bench : Hon’bie Shri SatiSh K. Agniho’m, J. Present :~ Shri Arvind Sinha, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Pane! Lawyer for the 3tate. PET!T!ONER RESPONDENTS ORDER ORAL (Passed on this 04‘ day of August. 201 1) The petrtioner impugns the order dated 21.06.2011! whereby, on account of non-presence of the‘petitioner in the proceedings, which was initiated against the petitioner for an alleged embezzlement of the Panchayat funds. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to file response to the show-cause notice, which was issued vide order dated 24.02.2011. However, the warrant of arrest should be quashed, as the petitioner has failed to appear on certain dates. Be that as it may, in a case where presence of petitioner is required, the petitioner must make herself avaiiabie on the date of hearing, as there are serious charges against the petitioner. if for want of presence, a warrant has been issued,'the petitioner has liberty to approach the authority concerned and make an application for canceliation of warrant on the grounds may be avaiiabie to the petitioner for non-presence on the severai dates. in View of the above, the-writ petition is dismissed with the above- stated liberty. h) i Sd/- x i a Judge E‘z’ 7,.5atish K.Agnihotri