IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM TUESDAY, THE 31ST AUGUST 2010 / 9TH BHADRA 1932 RP.No. 717 of 2010(I) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.27129/2009 Dated 27/10/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- T.G.FAJITHA, AGED 44 YEARS, W/O. BHUVANACHANDRAN NAIR, R.B.SADANAM, KALLIYODE, PANAVOOR P.O., NEDUMANGADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.B.N.SHIVSANKAR RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE HOUSING BAORD, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ACCOUNTS OFFICER, KERALA, STATE HOUSING BOARD, BRANCH OFFICE NEDUMANGADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE TAHSILDAR (RR), TALUK OFFICE, NEDUMANGADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 4. SHAHABUDEEN, S/O. MOIDEEN, RUBIA MANZIL, ARASUPRAMBU, 11TH KALLIL ROADARIKATH VEEDU, NEDUMANGADU VILLAGE, NEDUMANGADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. BIJOY CHANDRAN STANDING COUNSEL MR. POOVAPPALLY RAMACHANDRAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C.K. ABDUL REHIM, J ------------------------------------ RP NO. 717 OF 2010 IN WP(C) NO. 27129 OF 2009 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 31st day of August, 2010 ORDER By judgment sought to be reviewed, dated 27.10.2009, the petitioner was permitted to make payment of the entire arrears in one instalment of Rs.3,50,000/- on or before 15.12.2009 and the balance in 'six' equal monthly instalments starting from 15.01.2010 onwards. Eventhough the petitioner had raised various contentions refuting the liability and also disputed correctness of the amounts sought to be recovered, during the time of disposal of the case, learned counsel expressed willingness to pay off the entire liability within a reasonable time. Hence the petitioner was afforded with instalment facility, as a gesture of indulgence. It is further noticed that the petitioner filed I.A. No. 15753/2009 seeking extension of the time stipulated for complying with the conditions. On 06.01.2010, this Court allowed the said application and permitted petitioner to make payment of amount of Rs.3,50,000/- in two equal monthly instalments falling due on 15.01.2010 and 15.02.2010. Time for payment of subsequent instalments were also extended. 2. In the above circumstances, the dispute now raised through a Review Petition, challenging correctness of the balance amount outstanding, could not be entertained. There is no error manifest on the 2 RP No. 717/2010 IN WP(C) No. 27129/2009 face of the judgment warranting review of the judgment. Hence the Review Petition deserves no merits and the same is dismissed accordingly. 3. However counsel for the petitioner submitted that a scheme formulated by the Government for 'One Time Settlement' of housing loans availed from the first respondent Board is in operation and that petitioner will be entitled for benefit under the said scheme. It is made clear that the judgment in the Writ Petition as well as dismissal of the Review Petition will not stand in the way of the petitioner approaching the first respondent seeking 'One Time Settlement' or the Board considering grant of such benefit to the petitioner, if she is eligible. C.K. ABDUL REHIM JUDGE dnc