1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Cri. Writ Petition No. 392/2010 WITH Cri. Application No. 1802/2010 Kautikrao Shankarrao Pawar Versus The State of Maharashtra and another Mr. S.S. Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioner Mr. N.H. Borade, A.P.P. for respondent no.1 Mr. P.B.Paithankar, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. Date : 5th May, 2010 ORAL ORDER : 1 This writ petition was filed challenging legality of registration of Crime No. I-101/2010 of Kranti Chowk Police Station, Aurangabad. The petitioner and another were charged under section 420, 468, 471, 504, 506 r/w section 34 of Indian Penal Code. 2 Respondent no.2 had filed the complaint alleging that the petitioner and one Sundarlal forged documents to show that the respondent no.2’s property – a plot of land was sold to the petitioner. The respondent no.2 is now before the Court along with 2 her advocate and the respondent no.2 and petitioner jointly moved an application seeking quashing of the complaint. They informed the Court through a joint purshis that the dispute is settled and the petitioner had agreed to pay certain amount to the respondent no.2 and the respondent no.2 would not only withdraw complaint but also hand over possession of disputed plot of land to him. Compromise deed is placed on record. I verified as to whether the compromise is genuine. 3 The parties are before me. I heard them. I am convinced that the settlement is genuine. In view of this, petition deserves to be allowed. The complaint lodged by respondent no.2 stands quashed not only as against the petitioner but also other accused who is not before the Court. The petition is disposed of. In view of this, the criminal application no. 1802/2010 also stands disposed of. [A.V. NIRGUDE, J.] tsk/