IN THE HIGH COURTOF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, CHANDIGARH. RSA No.1716 of 2008 Date of decision: 4.2.2010 Mohammad Mumtaz .....Appellant vs. Ms.Musharaff and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG. Present: Mr.G.N.Malik, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr.Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Rakesh Kumar Garg,J.(Oral) This is defendants' appeal challenging the judgment and decree of the lower Appellate Court whereby suit filed by the plaintiff respondent Nos. 1 and 2 for partition of the property in dispute was decreed and a preliminary decree was ordered to be drawn. The only grievance raised before this Court is that the suit was bad for partial partition. A perusal of the impugned judgment and decree would show that a finding of fact has been recorded that only the property in question remained to be partitioned and the defendant could not point out any other property which was required to be included in the suit. Thus, the plea raised by the appellant with regard to partial partition was negated. Even before this Court, learned counsel counsel for the appellant was unable to point out any evidence from the record on the basis of which the plea raised by the appellant could be supported. No substantial question of law arises. No other point was urged. Dismissed. ( Rakesh Kumar Garg) Judge February 4, 2010 rk ( Rakesh Kumar Garg) Judge January , 2010 rk