PETITIONERS: HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. N0.77/2002 1. Udal S/o Jagat Ram Verma 2. Kartik ram S/o Daya ram Verma 3. Kejabai W/o Chhabi ramVerma 4. Girjanand S/o Kanaiya lal Verma 5. ' Hem lal S/o Puhup lal Verma 6. Satanand S/o Puhup lal Verma 7. Narendra S/o Tilak ram Verma 8. Rambaran S/o Bisauha Verma 9. Malik ram S/o Bisauha Verma 10. Nandkumar S/o Mohan Verma 11. Lakhan'lal S/o Jaita Verma 12. Durga Prasad S/o Nakul Verma 13. Bhagela S/o Dhelu ramVerma 14, Narayan S/o Bisauha Verma 15. Chandra Mohan S/o D.P. Verma 16. Smt. Anjani bai W/o D.P. Verma 17. Nandani bai - (Minor) D/o Satanand Verma 18. Devakibai (Minor) D/o Satanand Verma Both minor through father Satanand. ! 19. Pekhan lal S/o Satanand Verma All resident of Village Ravan P.C. No. 30 Tah. Simga, VERSUS 1. Grasim Cement (Grasim Industries Ltd;) through Vice ./ President Grasim Cement Ravan 2^ Sub-Divisional Oft'icer, Bhatapara Additional Collector, Baloda Bazar 4. State of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Raipur, Distt. Raipur RESPONDENTS: 11k. PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226, 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (SB :Hon'bIe Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:-Shri H.V. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri V.R. Tiwari, Advocate for the respondent No. 1. Shri Sumit Jhanwar, P.L. for the State/respondents No. 2 to 4. ORDER (Passed on 14/09/2011) 1. By this petition under Article 226, 227 of the Constitution of India petitioners have challenged the legality and propriety of the order dated 3/11/2000 passed by Sub Divisional Officer, Bhatapara in Rev. Case No. 243B/121 Year 99-2000 whereby specific order under Section 247(4) of the C.G. Lancl Revenue Code, 1959 has a ^^ ^%Eg£^; -z/- ^ been passed for which Sub Divisional Officer, Bhatapara is competent to pass such order. . .. » 2. Shri H.V. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners,. Shri V.R. Tiwari, Advocate for the respondent No. 1 and Shri Sumit Jhanwar, P.L. for the State/respondents No. 2 to 4 are heard. 3. Order impugned perused. 4. On due consideration, I do not find any illegality in the order impugned restricted to the Section 247(4) of the C.G. Land Revenue Code, 1959. Consequently, petition is liable to be dismissed and is ^ • ' . hereby dismissed. However, petitioners may avail remedy before the competent forum. No order as to costs. : Sd/- T.P Sharma Judge •^ / 'x A.X •d >''. "^ 'Bi