IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 9554 of 2004 Between: 1 P.Murali Mohan S/o Rama Rao Darsipet, Patamata, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2 Ramichetty Ram Babu S/o Sobhana Chalapathi Rao, R/o RTC Colony, Patamata, Vijayawada, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Sub Registrar-I Gandhinagar, Vijayawada, Krishna District 2 The Station House Officer Payakapuram Police Station Vijayawada, Krishna District Rural ... RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in accepting the registrations in RS.No.88 of Ambapuram village, Vijayawada taluk limits, Krishna district other than the title holders as arbitrary, illegal and also contrary to the provisions of Registration Act. 1988. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.B.SOMASEKHAR, Advocate Counsel for respondent No.1: Govt. Pleader for Revenue. Counsel for Respondent No.2: Govt. Pleader for Home. The Court at the stage of admission made the following: Oral Order: This writ petition is filed on the premise that the 1st respondent is registering the sale deeds without there being any identification to the execution by any witnesses and impersonating the petitioners such sale deeds were filed before the 1st respondent for registration. This Court by order dated 17-06-2004 directed the petitioners to produce any of the document to know whether any such registrations are taken place without complying the formalities and identify the persons who executed the sale deeds before the Sub-Registrar. Since the petitioners failed to produce any of such documents, no Mandamus can be issued on the premise that the 1st respondents is not following the procedure contemplated for registration of a document. As and when the petitioners notice that third parties are registering the documents impersonating the petitioners, it is open for them to lodge necessary complaint before the police about it with specific allegation of impersonation. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _________________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J. 22-07-2004 Murthy ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Sub Registrar-I Gandhinagar, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2 The Station House Officer Payakapuram Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District Rural. 3.Two CCs to the Govt. Pleader for Revenue, High Court Buildings. (OUT) 4. Two CCs to the Govt. Pleader for Home, High Court Buildings. (OUT) 5.Two CD copies.