^ W THE mGH COURT QE GHHATTISGARHAT BILASPtJR 2-1 WritPetition.No. PETITIONER: Hiralal S/o Shri Bansraj age about 52 yrs, Occu-Loader/Dresser, B.Seam Colliery Hasdeo Area-Dist Korea (C.G.) VERSUS: ItESPONDENTS: ; .^y ^•^y'i M^s^-:^ (^ ^*<^'<>' -.i%^ .^•^<y .^y <<^>^ 6^ (3- titionArticIe226?22' Personal Manager (IR) South Eastem Coal field Limited H.O. Bihispur C.G. Deputy Chief Personri Manager Hasdeo Area. Dist-Korea Personal Officer South JKD. Comeiy, Hasdeo Area. Dist-Korea IToftbe Constitotion uflndiaforissnance ofwrit ofCertiorari/Mandamus fr-ii XI-HC-22 311^1 q>I (<4i?b SIli&t ss**icr> +1^1 t,-< -fi-- ^s^^iraNa^^^iMta?1'"'^ *<i««iia»*ii«» giR{$I ygtsk, .j£i^ 1N^8~" <EH^S(( e«(i<g<•si^a 24.9.2004 Smt. Hamida,Siddiqye, counse) Shri H.B. Agrqwal with Si^i respondents. : The petitionep has preferr^ 226/227 of the Constitution of respondents oa directed to correct 10.8.1952 instead bf 1.7.1942;,(ii)}th< petitioner to work for further seven attain the age of six years; and (iii) •wa9es of four months i.e. from 30.6.i The petitioner's case isthat \\ the respondent Department on 20| petitioneris 10.8.1952, but qt the ; authorjty wrongly entered his date o^ an educated person and received edi the petitioner received notice o.f r^ approached the respondents 1-lasdeo Area;and represented hiscas Medical Boqrd. According to the schi the :petitioner's corpect dort-e of bir labourjieving eight|chiidren (mctwjfe. whole fdmily wiII;' be' on' the' f0(si rne throu^h FffXECi^T:'^tSI° ^ai&nian^B for the petitionen. •i Pankaj Agrawai counsel for the ;d this WFit petition under Ari'icle [India, seekihg reiiefs that (i) the •he date of birt'h of the petitioner as respondents be dipect.ed t6 al!ow the ^ears from the year 2Q03 when he wili respondents be directed to pdy the E002to 29.10.2002. |e was appo'mted as Loader/bresser in jl.1973. The date of birth of the ime bf joining service the appointing f birt-h as 1.7.1942. The petitioner is jcation up to Class-V. A!i of,a sudden, ttir'ement (Annexure P-2). Then, he the 6enera! Secretar// INTUC, i^,then he was asked to appear before ^ol-leaving cerl'ificate (Annexyre P-3), 'f-h is 10.8.1952. The petitioner 'is a |If he is ousted from service, then his 1 After madical examindtion, the ^]i:::,^:^^] UJ8^|SD3 j.0 34JOp S14 LjSlljM Ul SJO|n31.t.lDd 33)AJ 3lf+ 'ZS6T •":>3X 3'^ "! +30J. ui ••jo paAissaj ^auoi+ij.ad aq+ 'uappns D som t|4*iiq 40 84J[>p siq i|3iqM ui ^-8 'E/.6T'fiD2 uo •i3uoi4.!4.9d 344. J.o +uaui| jaq+jnj. uaaq sotf 4.1 •4.uauiaau6o 4.oifj •yvM X+np uo ua>jD4. sq 04. paiwp|]o puo 'jndsiD]ig 'pa+iu.ii'i spiaij.poy s^4. j.o 4.u3tu?sasspi SI.J+ 0.1.: SuipJpsoti) sui •uo!4.!+sd +um ui +du 4.nq 'j |OM+snpuj 4.uaiuujaiAog |OJ+ua3. aq+ 4; ||oijs +1 U8q+ apoui aq 04. SPL| aauoAauq 31)4. j.o g^ U014.39S 'japun Suipuiq SJB ss+ndsiq |DU4.snpui-.3q4. japun uoi+sujs ui '^.S6T '?siny (!0^+ua35 sa+ndsiQ |0)4. SDiVt Vpl^M '3A!4.D4.U3Saudaj UOIUfl Sll.l j.{ j.o 3>in4Du6is 3i)+s>roaq t-d sjnxauu^ soij 4.1 L)3iL|M ui s+uapuodsaj 31(4. ^.O j.| J3tf4*in^ D ^oj. 2002'OT'9Z luojj. aaiAjs uo SD sjcsX 9Q sc sauiuija+ap sD} p34.np 4.yatUaaj6D3tf4.o+ 6ujpjo33y •sj Lj3ii.jm '+uauiaa^So 'yo o.i.ui ja+us 04^ l.^llc.'I.Cjlo^ u iiawh <as sq.!. +no^° P3luyo^u! SDI" .lauoi+i+ad d002'T'6 pa+cp ?%+°u Uoi+DriuuDjsdns jj.o ||»+S4+ p8!U3p si +1 'psptiosa.i |8jnxsuuy si i|3!t|M pa|| ij. SDIW g uuoj luioddo j.o 30114. 31)4. +D 4.Dt|+ p3Uo!4.uatU puoAaq 06 +OUUD3 si| MOU '2002"OT"62 |sow> atj A]UO 4.u3Uiai+4.ss j.o siuj3+ u6 q+nos 31J+ j.0 'pJDog '[oaipsvy xady. L|4.Jiq ^o 84.0p su+psa^SD ^auoi+i^sd id|oq»t '+Jno,? ^n°qo^ turo [DunqMi [q pau4. sc] 04. ^a44i)iu 4;33rqns 31)4. aq l^u»i-t 'Zfr6T '+sy sa4.ndsiq |Dij+snpui |S4-uaui3|-l-4.as i|3ns ssnosaq '^.frfi? '+ay |D6a[ aij4. SDLJ +1 'a^ioj.ajaLij. 'g-j lujoj l+snpui si|+ 40 (^) gg a|ny japun 3uop 1.^ a.in+DuGjs Sti+osio puo jauoi.i.i+ad 344. +usiU33^6o 344. +DLJ4. pauoi+uatu uaaq [OLjaq uo pa|y uaaq SDI; ujn.i.ay ; •s^DaAoflS4. ^.o poijad UO >|3Bq US>|D4. WM 3Lf puo 200S'6'82 i|w 360 S^auoi+i+isd 31)4. '3002"OT'9Z [.uapuods^j st|4- ^o sssuijoj+iquo swtoq? |auoi+i4.ad 944. pa|]adui03 s+uapuodsa.1 eif»>feii»afebitc ;? •^- pyt^<fclht|6 J^l£^b^. l«b KyBS _•a!>0b]__...„._.„_. tblhtB lUkllt ^t^'S^W ' Wi;ytt»feh 1^1 ; ^' )f;»ii;>i»j'%ii>i»p®a"EISIElKi'Ea£. ZZ-3H-DC i:illl8 li.jgillll !i!:!M! ;! iiiaii!1 •:.;BI ^sa:?gE(!S&^§!!s>-Pral<'"s< *n»iwi<BII«I> 3(I^?T WWk ^^>SLS. 'la^sC ^ •e- f^S dtBt'n 6«OIW^te ^t .birth vudswritten aa 1.7.1942, whicft | Annexures R-l & R-2 the petition| quaiifwation, moreoyer, he put his thi^mb service register as vuelt as medical cet|tificate doted 30.9.2002 is Annexure R-5. Ulf the writ petition. I ha.ve hsard learried counsel ff Learned eounse! for the peW^mer ieaving cerl-ificate, the correct date She submitted That^in view of the Joj 25.4.t988 (Annexure P-5), Imp!ement|ri-ion &etermincrt-ion/Vemfication of Age ofl envisages that '. s Annexure R-2. Therefore, in view of :r has not mehtioned his education impression on qll these papers vjz., i. ApexAAeclicalBoai-d'sreport' Mmqtely, it has been prayed to dismiss "In the case of appomtdp in a recognized educati^ birth recorded in the shall be treated as co^ same will not be altered\inder Therefore, learhed counsel for the flbove instructions, •1'he respondent the petitioner and corrected the dat^ Having hedrd the learned coun; the record. Perusal ofthe record rev< serv'ice, th& petitioner had fi lled For'rh 'W&Mi 'WsS9 ^SM ^af& 3iiSar irtbe parties. | argued that.as per the school- jf birth of the petiti'Qner is 10.8.1952. ht Bi.pari-ite Committee circulcr dated Instruction No.76 Procedure for- Employees, sub-clause (II) of Part A }ps who have pursued sfudies ^nal Institution, fhe date of \School Leaving Certificate, }rect date of birth and the any circtimstances." |)etitioner urged that in view of the o(ight to have considered the case of of birt-h accordingly. jel for the petitioner, I have pepused ^als that at the ti.me entering into the B Annexure R-l and otherparticulars eit^i XI-HC-22 sii^rw R-litbSllSRT sh*licft ^lt^i ^f^SS^S,,^WI^fmmy. •sn^W-''^^^::.,,^..:. ^i:.g.;.Ji^3&j-3^:! ..g^^.—.,,.,..;—.—...—.~^-,-,^^ ' fcl^t^I" *iii?iTa>*(i«<» ^- were entered. Everi ailSi'l ('wwate —Z(-*- the dffteof biilth 1.7.1942, which bear? the thumb impl{ has been mentioned that heis educalf . ^ the year 1987, the petitioner was inj service particulars in whichdlso he m^ and he aiso mentioned the names of hit he received the nofice of retiremenlf silent and henever raised disputeregi of birth by the respondents. Even issued, the petitioner was well respondents for correction <sf date certificate. After: receiving the represented .his, case and accordingis| Atedica! Board for.determination of dated 30.9.2002, his age was by him under the agreement signed same. - As far as the question of the first. instance; the dote of bj -certificate is nota conclusive proof o-\ filing this writ petition and before petitioner had never' apprised the school ieavingcertificote, and claimed of the petition'er was entered as impl|ession of the peTitioner. Nowhere it l^ed up to C!ass-V. Even thereafter, in rimated vide Annexure R-2 about his i^ntioned his date of birth as 1.7.1942, itfamilymembersgtc.. Therefore,tril |Annexure P-2, the pefitioner remain ji|.rding the recording of incorrect date wi1|hin his right to dete.r'miited ^rillE'll^ltll ^tFwf.^T fe^ ^'^ttRw^aiiftiit when the instructions of 1988 were represent to the |f birth aiong with his schooi-leaving n<|tice for f'eti'rement, the petitioner ', his case was referred before the (lis age. As per the medical report' as58yedrsaric!thatwasaccepted l|>y him, now, he cannot challenge the schot>l leaving cert-ificate is concerned, in |rth recorded in i the schbol-leaving age. In the second instance, before ^eceiving the retirement notice, the resbondents about his date of birth and the protection of instructions, vuhjch ^K^^'(^; ^^^•^^•S^S^^''^. XI-HC-22 •3^^HT3% ^WIii, ftaW3i 1|t|CTI-tl»*ll<» SII^T ljsl<^i _jc/..fe:.Ma^feS2i :1 I^^T' •Kl^itl^I i<iiicr> '»ti^i S0*l tl(?tl- Soma/Sunita c llif wi& d ^tf^ ?«i|i3T^f?tf - s~- jifst examir|ing <tn leJearned counsel foFi+he petitioB!erji|i avingcer+ificate Annexure P-3 reveai^ ^ •. . ; srt-ificate on 15.2.1993 and he reniainey ie notice of vetirement. AAoreover, th4 ^ a Boardand the Board after icst.the petitioner was58 years old as s per the school-leayihg cert'ificate, Hi^ |;amination, nftsuch inaccuracy'cantfe, Therefore, I am of the opihion suing any writ and direction by this [smissed and therefore, it is dismissed.l Consequently, M.(W.)P.No.; ^posed bf. - now referred. Even the school- that the petitiorier obtained the I si !ent ti II 2002 when he received petitioner wds medically examined him reached tothe conciusion the date of medical examination. age was 50years.In the medical ttioughtpf. | the petltioner^has nocase for L. The petitioh is liable to be that Cburt. tfeii'^^ili-t H\^S ^ 'fe^'^sgrc ^~<tiE^w!3D^g • 2909/2d04 and I.A.No.6980/2004Stand Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge [i»^g^ KX ilHiN IJIj^!^