IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41167 of 2007 UMESH PRASAD RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2 17.12.2008 Heard Mr. Rabindra Kr. Priyadarshi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Jharkhandi Upadhaya, the learned A.P.P. for the State and Mr. Satyabir Bharti, learned counsel for O.P .No. 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for quashing of the Complaint Case bearing No. 642(C) of 2007 including the order dated 24.5.2007 registered under section 420 I.P.C. and section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. It had been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner with reference to Annexure 2 that all the disputes and differences have amicably been settled and the complainant had made good the loss the Company had suffered. The learned counsel for O.P. No. 2 does not dispute the situation. Since the parties have amicable settled their disputes and differences and the complainant O.P.no. 2 had no axe to grind and his grievance has been satisfied no gainful purpose would be served by keeping the case alive. Accordingly the entire criminal proceeding so far as the petitioner is concerned is hereby quashed and the application is allowed. spd/- (Abhijit Sinha, J.)