The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.11847 of 2010 Date: 30-08-2010 Between: The Toddy Tapers Cooperative Society, Malkapur Village. ..... Petitioner AND The Deputy Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise, Medak Division and another. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.M.Damodar Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: --- The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside order, dated 27-04-2010, of respondent No.1, whereby he has confirmed order, dated 22-03-2010 of respondent No.2, cancelling the depot license of the petitioner-society even before receipt of the chemical analysis report from the independent laboratory. The facts in this Writ Petition are similar to that in W.P.No.9180 of 2010 with the only difference that the said Writ Petition related to the shop licenses while the present one is concerned with the depot license. By order, dated 22-04-2010, this Court allowed WP.No.9180 of 2010 on the short ground that even before receipt of the analysis report on the second sample sent to the State Food Laboratory, Nacharam, Hyderabad, the cancellation of shop licenses by respondent No.2 was illegal. In the present case, it is pleaded by the petitioner and not disputed by the respondents that even in respect of the petitioner’s depot, respondent No.2 has sent the second sample drawn therefrom for chemical analysis to the State Food Laboratory, Nacharam, and that without awaiting receipt of the report and considering the same, he passed the final order on 22-03-2010 cancelling the petitioner’s depot license. The said action was questioned by the petitioner in an appeal filed before respondent No.1, who dismissed the same by his order, dated 27-04-2010. For the same reasons as contained in Order, dated 22-04-2010, in WP.No.9180 of 2010, this Writ Petition deserves to be allowed. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is allowed and orders, dated 27-04-2010 and 22-03-2010 passed by respondent Nos.1 and 2 respectively are set aside. Respondent No.2 is given liberty to pass a fresh order, after considering the chemical analysis report of the second sample drawn from the petitioner’s depot and the explanation, if any, to be submitted by the petitioner on such report. As a sequel WPMP.No.14959 of 2010, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 30th August, 2010 lur