IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: May 11, 2011 1. Civil Writ Petition No.5329 of 2006 Gurpyari Sharma & others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . 2. Civil Writ Petition No.5567 of 2006 Suresh Kumar .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . 3. Civil Writ Petition No.7225 of 2006 Suraj Bhan & others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & others .....RESPONDENT(S) CWP No.5329 of 2006 [2] . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. R.N. Sharma and Mr. R.S. Malik, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Sukhvinder Singh Nara, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondents. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This shall dispose of three petitions viz. Civil Writ Petition Nos.5329 of 2006 titled ‘Gur Pyari Sharma & others vs. State of Haryana & others’; 5567 of 2006 titled ‘Suresh Kumar vs. State of Haryana & others’; and 7225 of 2006 titled ‘Suraj Bhan & others vs. State of Haryana & others’ as common questions of law and facts are involved. 2. For reference to facts, file of Civil Writ Petition No.5329 of 2006 titled ‘Gur Pyari Sharma & others vs. State of Haryana & others’ is being taken up. 3. This petition has been filed praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari, quashing letters/ orders Annexure P-1 to P-3, dated 20.6.2005, 21.12.2005 and 20.3.2006 respectively. Vide the impugned orders, pay of the petitioners has been refixed on withdrawal of increment(s). 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners assert that CWP No.5329 of 2006 [3] cases of the petitioners are covered by judgment dated 10.4.2008 rendered by Division Bench of this Court in ‘Om Parkash & others vs. State of Haryana & others’, reported as 2008(3) S.C.T. 310. 5. Learned counsel for the respondent-State contends that indeed the cases of the petitioners would be covered by judgment rendered by this Court in Om Parkash’s case (supra). 6. The petitions are decided in terms of judgment dated 10.4.2008 rendered by Division Bench of this Court in ‘Om Parkash & others vs. State of Haryana & others’, reported as 2008 (3) S.C.T. 310. (AJAI LAMBA) May 11, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?