IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 18839 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 27.09.2011 Gautam Garg ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Sandeep Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Chahal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. RAJESH BINDAL, J. The allegations in the present FIR against the petitioner are that he was purchasing kerosene oil at a low rate and selling the same to the fac- tory owners at a higher rate. Recovery of alleged kerosene oil contained in seven drums has already been effected. It is not disputed by the learned counsel for the State that the petitioner has joined investigation. Considering the aforesaid facts, in my opinion, custodial inter- rogation of the petitioner is not required. Interim bail granted to the peti- tioner on 06.07.2011, is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 27.09.2011 sharmila