1 Criminal Application Nos.1783/2011, 1788/2011, 1765/2011, 1924/2011, 1811/2011, 1700/2011 &1734/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1783 OF 2011 Suresh s/o Vitthal Jeurkar & anr. ... APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra ... RESPONDENT ..... Shri V.D. Sapkal, Advocate for applicants Shri V.H. Dighe, A.P.P. for respondent ..... W I T H CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1788 OF 2011 Raosaheb s/o Raghunath Nimse ... APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra ... RESPONDENT ..... Shri V.D. Hon, Advocate for applicant Shri N.B. Patil, A.P.P. for respondent ..... W I T H CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1765 OF 2011 Yogesh Bhausaheb Jadhav ... APPLICANT 2 Criminal Application Nos.1783/2011, 1788/2011, 1765/2011, 1924/2011, 1811/2011, 1700/2011 &1734/2011 VERSUS The State of Maharashtra ... RESPONDENT ..... Shri A.B. Kale, Advocate for applicant Shri V.H. Dighe, A.P.P. for respondent ..... W I T H CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1924 OF 2011 Amol s/o Gajanan Ghawate ... APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra ... RESPONDENT ..... Mrs. Renuka Ghule, Advocate for applicant Shri N.B. Patil, A.P.P. for respondent ..... W I T H CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1811 OF 2011 Atish Rameshwar Gaikwad ... APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra ... RESPONDENT ..... Shri G.B. Rajale, Advocate for applicant Shri N.B. Patil, A.P.P. for respondent ..... 3 Criminal Application Nos.1783/2011, 1788/2011, 1765/2011, 1924/2011, 1811/2011, 1700/2011 &1734/2011 W I T H CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1700 OF 2011 Radhakisan s/o Trimbak Ukirde and others ... APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra ... RESPONDENT ..... Shri R.N. Dhorde, Advocate holding for Shri V.R. Dhorde, Advocate for applicants Shri K.M. Suryawanshi, A.P.P. for respondent ..... W I T H CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1734 OF 2011 Jagannath s/o Bhausaheb Pokale ... APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra ... RESPONDENT ..... Smt. S.S. Jadhav, Advocate for applicant Shri V.H. Dighe, A.P.P. for respondent ..... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 2nd May, 2011 4 Criminal Application Nos.1783/2011, 1788/2011, 1765/2011, 1924/2011, 1811/2011, 1700/2011 &1734/2011 PER COURT : 1. Heard Mrs. Renuka Ghule for the accused/ applicant in Criminal Application No.1924/2011. Notice returnable forthwith. Learned A.P.P. waives service for the State. He is equipped with the investigation papers as other group of matters in the same crime is taken and which is taken for hearing. 2. Heard finally. The accused/ applicants, in custody from 1.4.2011, were allegedly found behaving either in indecent manner or in compromising position in Room Nos.2, 4 or open room. Nothing more is suggestive against these applicants, to be indulged either as a pimp or brothel conductor. The contention that, under the guise of amusement centre (Kala Kendra), illegal brothel was conducted, will be taken care at the proper stage. The applicants are not in the category to involve themselves for abduction or to face infraction of committing offence in terms of Prevention of Immoral Trafic (PITA) Act or Bombay Police Act. Nothing is to be recovered from them. Further custody not warranted as the accused/ applicants have roots in the society and no criminal record. Hence order : 5 Criminal Application Nos.1783/2011, 1788/2011, 1765/2011, 1924/2011, 1811/2011, 1700/2011 &1734/2011 O R D E R (i) The Applicants in Criminal Application Nos. 1783/2011, 1788/2011, 1765/2011, 1924/2011, 1811/2011, 1700/2011 and 1734/3011 be released on their furnishing P.R. bond and a surety in the sum of Rs.5000/- (Rupees five thousand) each. (ii) The accused/ applicants shall attend the M.I.D.C. Police Station, Ahmednagar whenever so specifically commended. They will not influence the witnesses and particularly the women/ the girls found at the amusement centre. Applications finally disposed of. K.U. CHANDIWAL JUDGE fmp/cri1783.11