é) ?\%4/ IN THE HIGH COURTOFJUDICATURE AT BIIASPURKCEJ MiscellaneOusAppeaiNo. 3k /2oo4 M _ _ iggafmmia ’r APPLICANTS: - ,1) 5m Rama Yadu Wi€e oFsm Sukalu Ram CLMANTS aged abcuf 48 years. AI E 2) Jit€ndra Kumar S/o SH Sukalu Ram Yadu, Aged about 28 yaars, . g3: 3) Sanfosh S/o Sri Sukalu Ram Yadu ..- Aged about 26 years, Dilip Kumar S/o Sri Sukalu Ram Yadu " 1 Aged about 24 yaars AH are R/o V1Hagc & Posf Chhura Tal-ml Garlaband Dls’tk‘ RaipurCG VERSUS ‘ RESPONDENTS ’4') Unnikrishat} S/o Sri Gopal Krishnan Nair NON~APPLICANT5 Through; Lokayukt special Pqhce é Esfablishmenf 0(6ca) Raipur CG. Police Mabanici;shal<(D.G.P.) Police OHQccCHha‘ctisgarh Govt Raipur Disfk ~ Raipur CG. 3) State oFc.G. Through -. Collector / Distt _ Kanpur cc. g) y v Misjcelbneous Aggegl anger sediou 173 OF Motor Vehides Act 1988 ? ‘ Being aggrieveé ’che Juégemeg’c gné awarQ pgsseé by the \fiiirc} Acidifionai Motor Accicient Claims Tribunal l Raivur in Claim Case No 168/2002 Juddement dared 0512 2005 m case of Rama Yadu & ofhers versus gmkrislma 1 & others. ‘ we“ Mavml y e l 3 D 1‘ 1 1 i i 5hrl 5. C. Verma, Advocafe’ for The appellanf(s). - Heard. i i ‘V ‘ The case is Iis‘fed for orde ’s on defauH Learned counsel for fhe appellan+(s) prays for fume 1'0 As prayea fwo weeks default If the default Is no? re ved wrrhin ‘l'he shpulafed ‘hme {he appeal shall be dismissediau‘roma‘hcally wrl'houf/furfhei'l reference 1'0 The Bench Sdl- Fakhruddm Judge xf-E i ‘ remove 'rhe defauh' ‘ B : Hon’ble Shri Fakhruddin nd Hon‘ble Shri L Bhad ' JJ. 11 2004 x ‘i me is gramed to remove fhe l l g ll c ’t‘ \