**1** IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No.5003/2009 Ganpati Yashwant Latawade and others. ....Petitioners -VERSUS- Shivram Bapurao Khombare and others. ....Respondents ........... Mr.V.B.Rajure, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr.M.S.Lagu, Advocate for the Respondents Nos.1 to 3. Mr.A.I.Patel, A.G.P. for the Respondent/State. ........... CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. Dated 14th October, 2009. P.C. : 1 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners. The Petitioners are the original Defendants Nos.1 and 3 to 5. An application was made by the Petitioners at Exhibit-115 seeking permission to file an additional Written Statement. The said application was rejected by the Trial Court by the impugned order. 2 After having heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the Petitioners, I find that there is no error in the impugned order apart from the fact that there is no provision for filing such further pleadings. The Trial Court has noted that the evidence of both the parties is already closed. Hence, no case for interference is made out. Writ Petition is rejected. [A.S. OKA, J.] kps