IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc No. M-5968 of 2009 Date of decision : 18.05.2009 Karamvir @ Kamma ....Petitioner V/s State of Haryana and another ....Respondents BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. G.C. Shahpuri, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG Punjab. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner absconded from the proceedings due to reasons beyond his control. He has referred to certificate Annexure P-2 issued by Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh to show that his maternal uncle was admitted for treatment. According to the counsel, petitioner had to attend the patient during this period and could not appear before the trial court. Learned counsel has also emphasizes that in the entire FIR, role attributed to the petitioner is a sword blow on the left leg of the complainant. Counsel further submits that all other accused were granted bail. Learned counsel for the State does not dispute that the petitioner was granted bail earlier but did not appear on four dates before the trial court due to which proclamation proceedings were initiated against him. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the Crl. Misc No. M-5968 of 2009 -2- considered view that petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jagadhri. This will, however, subject to heavy surety and an undertaking to be furnished by the petitioner that he shall not absent himself from trial on any date in future. Allowed in the aforesaid terms. 18.05.2009 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE