IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1030 of 2010 1. SAMI AHMAD 2. Hasan Ahmad 3. Laddu 4. Sadam Ahmad Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 04.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that petitioners are claiming their possession over the land and the case may fall for differences for bona fide land dispute with super added allegation of committing theft of other articles also, even then petitioners are apprehending their arrest which never can be justified. Specifically, it is said that in a proceeding under Section 144 Cr. P.C., land was found in possession of petitioners. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 461 of 2009, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the 2 like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Mithilesh Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Nawada subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)