/ff0, •A IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fCHHATTISGARHy . WRIT PETITION (S} N0. 5^ 6 OF 2006 PETITIONER \^.^^-;. ^^^ ./•".^ ^-y^> €yy <fy\^--" ^ RESPONDENTS y>' G^ Ramsingh Kanwar, aged about 35 years, Son of Shri Pyarelal, Occupation-Service, Presently posted as Patwari, Halka No.ll, Gadapali, R.I. Circle Barpali, Tahsil Kartala, District Korba (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through": ^. The Secretary, Department^ of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Deputy Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 3. The Commissioner, (Land Records), Raipur (C.G.). 4. The Collector, District Korba, (C.G.). RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF IN_DIA ,^^ ? ^- i<°f-'lrf1 ^'^^ '^- ij> XI-HC-78 HIHMI awrai S^'^nqRW, (SiTflu'lti, l°ldl«y .M^.^(?.*..^.^.( ^ 200^ 311^1 Macn (^qt^q^'iT) Sd^TWf^lN; gqTW^TOTNi ?T<TRR Hl??'3I1^?T chl<lt<1<fl-l WRff ff te^ <.R|^1<. ^srf^irsn^r 7.8.2006:- Shri P.P. Sahu, counsel for |e petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Go^/t. Advocate for fte Stets/respondents, on advance copy. Heard. By the instant petition, the pe|titioner has challenged the order dated 30-6-2006 whereby the petitioner h^s been transferred from Halte No.10, R.I. Circle Barpali, District Korba (i Surguja. The main grievance of the o Halka No.9, Tehsil Kusmi, District petitioner is that he is a district level emptoyee and he has been transferred inter-district, which is going to affect his seniority and other emoluntents. In the circumstances, leame|d counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner may be allow^d to make a representation to the respondent No.1 and he be directed|to decide the same, to which counsel for respondents has no objection. Having heard learned couns^l for the parties, having regard to the iacts andcircumstances of the cas|e and wtthout expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the pra^rer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is just, fair and reasonab|e. Therefore, the petitioner is atlowed to make a drtailed representation E| respondent No.1 raising all his grie^ today and in turn, respondent No.1| petitioner within a period of 30 c) representation, after considering all| accordance with law. long with a copy of this petifen to the rances within a period of 10 days from shall decide the representation ofthe |ays from the date of receipt of the 1 the points raised by the petitioner, in P.T.O. XI-HC-78 3^'-?rraT?PT, ®Tfl*ns,(slcliyy tTTfl^n Sb*1|th W[ 200 3TI^?Tl|d<* ('i^t^^'T) 3Ti^rqn'R^i+ (raT3TI^Tsbli+ & Barve V" <^» •fjo 5T(TTWHf?(TSn^T -^- ahd In ttie meantime, the effect respect of the petitioner shall petitioner is decided. With the direction aforesaid, Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.qc Parties are entitled for certifletl operation of the impugned order in rema|in stayed, till the representation of the the peh'tion stands disposed of. 020/2006 also stands disposed of. copyofthisorder. Scii' L.C. 9^iao° jUriS8 Wlfwfl^ WRTt'ff fe^t (fezTC ^aTf^iTsn^r ^ P.T.O. so