@ F/§\/ Ci iN TFE HIGH OOUL—lT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIL£¥SPUR. %Jnb@.I&WZOE2mm. PE Ti TIONER u Lakhan Lal Paiel, S/o Shr Naihu Ram Patel, aged about 50 years, R/o Karaihapara Batanpur police station Bat, Distric Bilaspur, {C.G.). State of Chhaitisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Deparen% o Hbe, .K.S. Bhawan, Raipur,(C.G.). The Ct ollecox, Diict iiaspur, .G.). s r E (0 The Supexintendent ?olice, Dietric BilaSpu, (C.G.). Rambhagae Patel , presideni f Marar atel Samaj Kriehm Prasad Paei, Secretary of Mara: Patel a Th abov named reSpondent no. 4 & 5 are R/o Karaihapara, Bafanpur, Police Station Ratanpu, District BilaSpur, (.G.). The Sfatio House Officer, (Police), Refanpur, Ditrict BilaSpur, (C.G.). conid..2 $ i , ; aE§ r m f m D of t r o P yf a t Sm e e r C n s /2/ K/ hRI T PE. TI HON UNDER A8 TI CLE 226/ 227 OF IHE: CONSTI TUTION Q‘F INDIA FOR ISSUE OF AN APPEOPRIATE Wr‘xi'f .T.N THE Nmmi{E OF xll‘JDNx-ZU R DIRECTJIO tkDER IN T VI“ ME GER TIORABI ETC. O N O HE IT PETITION UNDER ARTTCLE 226/22? OF THE CONSTITUTIGN OF INDIA SB: Eon’bie Shi'i Satish K. Agnjhotria}. Present: HIGH COURT GF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRYI‘ PETITION No. 1642 of2002 PETITIONER Lakhan Lai Patel S/o Shri Nathu Ram Patel, Aged about 5G years, R/o Karaihapaxa, Raianpur, Pohce Station Ratanpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through: Ths Secretary, Department of Home, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) ‘ The CoHecton District Biiaspur, (C.G.) The Superintendent of Police; District Bilaspur Rambhagat Patel, President of Marg‘TateT Samaj. (C.G.) Krishna Prasad Patel, Secretary of Marar Patel Samaj. ‘7 The above named respondent No. 4 and 5 are FJO Karaihapara, Ratanpur, Police Station RAtanpur, District Bilaspur (CG) The Station House O$cer (Police) Ratanpur, District Biiaspur (C.G.) Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Government Advocate for the State. Shri Anand Kumar Gupta, Advocate for the respondent No. 4 and 5. ORDER g ORAL; (Passed 0:1 08 day of Augtist, 2009) t RESPONDENTS The matter is calied for hearing twice. None appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. In View ofthe above: the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. [isdl- - ‘ Satish K. Agmhotn 9 309’ 7. None for the petitioner. T W M? WR