IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35725 of 2011 Charbind Mahto & Ors. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3 21-11-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners are accused in a case registered under sections- 376/341 of the Indian Penal Code with allegation that they committed rape upon the informant. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the alleged occurrence took place on 21.03.2011 at 9.00 a.m. whereas the fardbeyan of the informant was recorded at 9.30 p.m. and moreover, the medical evidence also does not support the allegation of the informant but I am not at all convinced with his submission. The impugned order reveals that some objective features were also found by the I.O. at the place of occurrence and apart from this, the doctor has found injury on the person of the victim and has also opined that some forcible sexual activity has been happened with the victim without omission of semen. Therefore, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submission of the parties, I am not inclined to release the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioners in connection with Nath Nagar P.S case no. 45 of 2011 pending in the court of Shri Atul Kumar Singh, J.M-Ist class, Bhagalpur stands rejected. A.K. Vishwakarma/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)