IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH JANUARY 2011 / 29TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 1821 of 2011(C) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- C.K.RAGHAVAN, RESURVEY SUPERINTENDENT (UNDER SUSPENSION, SULTHAN BATHERY, WAYANAD). BY ADV. SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER FOR LAND REVENUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SURVEY DIRECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WAYANAD. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. SANDESH RAJA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 1821 of 2011 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 19th day of January, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a Re-survey Superintendent in the Revenue Department. He was suspended from service, pending disciplinary proceedings on 22.1.2010. Thereafter, by Ext. P5 dated 23.11.2010, the petitioner was reinstated without prejudice to the disciplinary proceedings. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking the following relief: “Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 1st respondent to consider Ext. P7, regularize the suspension period of the petitioner and grant to him all consequential monetary and other benefits.” I am of opinion that insofar as the petitioner has been reinstated subject to disciplinary proceedings, the question of regularisation of the suspension period can be considered only after conclusion of the disciplinary proceedings and not now. Therefore, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to seek his relief after the disciplinary proceedings are over in accordance with the result of the disciplinary proceedings, this writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.