f'^-11 r:f;'~^.:—j-"^~'^. 'v. ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR PETITIONER W.P.(C) No. 1714 of 2011 Gram Panchayat Hathnevara, Janpad Panchayat Bamhnidih, Tahsil- Champa, Distt.- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) Through- the Sarpanch namely Prem Singh Sidar S/o Jhadu Singh aged about 55 years, R/o- village Hathnevara, Tahsil- Champa, Distt.- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS 1 State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Collector Janjgir-Champa Distt.- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 2 The Tahsildar Champa, Distt.- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 3 Prakash Industrial Limited Champa, Through- the General Manager, Prakash industrial Limited Champa, Tahsil- Champa, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Mr. Rishi Rahul Soni, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents 1 & 2. ORALORDER (30.03.2011) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard. Mr. Rishi Rahul Soni, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that a proceeding u/s 248 (1) of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959 is pending before respondent No.2 since 29.9.2010 and no decision in the matter has been taken till date. His submission is that the proceedings were initiated at the instance of petitioner-Gram Panchayat, therefore, a direction may be issued to respondent No.2 to dispose of the said matter at an early date. 'E-»«i '•it,',,'': ?;SK'".,i.:-• 'Jil. ..-^^h-L ^.-^-.^-;5 W.P.(C) No. 1714 of 20A1 Number ofthe encroachment proceedings is Revenue CaseNo. 01 A 68/2010-2011. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, 1 am not inclined to issue any time bound direction at this stage. However it is observed that respondent No.2 would try to dispose of the matter expediously. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost. §,}/. Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge vatti