S.B. CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.269/2008 Hansraj Vs. Gouri Shanker & Anr. Date of Order : 5th January, 2009 PRESENT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. G.R. Goyal for the petitioner. --------- Heard learned counsel. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 12.8.2008 of the learned trial court whereby the learned trial court rejected the application of the defendant-petitioner under Order 7 Rule 11 holding that merely because the land in question is agricultural land as per the Jamabandi produced by the defendant, it could not be said that the dispute pertained to the revenue law because that would depend upon the nature of controversy involved in the suit. Apparently the controversy pertains to claim of certain rights under the agreement between the parties to sell the part of agricultural land which appears to have been claimed to be a colony known as Shri Ram Colony, Sri Ganganagar, which would be apparently an abadi land, therefore, it appears that prima facie this is not essential that the dispute pertained to revenue law only which could be decided by the revenue Court under Section 207 of the of the Tenancy Act. The Civil Court has, therefore, not committed any error in rejecting the application under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. The present revision petition of the defendant is found to be devoid of merit. The same is accordingly dismissed. [ DR. VINEET KOTHARI ], J. item No.2 babulal/-