IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM MONDAY, THE 9TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 20TH MAGHA 1930 LA.App..No. 1347 of 2007() -------------------------- LAR.16/2003 of SUB COURT,THODUPUZHA .................... APPELLANT(S): -------------- STATE OF KERALA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BASANT BALAJI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- RAJEEV,S/O.LATE LEELAMMA,THAYAKODATHU HOUSE,THODUPUZHA VILLAGE,THODUPUZHA TALUK. ADV. SRI.M.G.KARTHIKEYAN THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 9/2/2009 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------ L.A.A.No. 1347 OF 2007 ------------------------ Dated this the 9th day of February, 2009 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. Heard both sides. We have noticed our judgments in L.A.A. No.506/2008 and L.A.A.No.598/2007. According to Mr.M.G.Karthikeyan, learned counsel for the respondent, in view of the judgments in those cases, there is no ground for interfering with the judgment which is impugned in this case. Sri. P.K.Babu, the learned Government Pleader would submit that the court below was not justified in awarding the same land value to the properties in this case which as per the award of the land acquisition officer were inferior. But, what we find is that the learned sub judge has found that the acquired property in this case, is in no way inferior to the properties involved in the other case, and the court below has actually entered a finding that in view of nearness to Mangattukavala Junction, this property was slightly superior to the properties in the other cases. We find that absolutely no counter evidence was adduced by the Government to the evidence adduced by the claimant. We L.A.A..No.1347/2007 2 do not find any warrant for interfering with the judgment. This appeal will stand dismissed. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE dpk