IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 21ST JUNE 2010 / 31ST JYAISTHA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 1315 of 2009(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.2858/2007 Dated 24/01/2007 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- VILASINI, AGED 67, W/O. VASU, POOVAMPILLY HOUSE, NAYARAMBALAM, VYPIN. BY ADV. SRI.K.S.MADHUSOODANAN SRI.T.V.JAYAKUMAR NAMBOODIRI SRI.THUSHAR NIRMAL SARATHY SRI.M.M.VINOD KUMAR SMT.K.M.RAMYA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. C.A.THOMAS, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY, KOCHI. 2. E.A.JOSE, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, VILLAGE OFFICER, NAYARAMBALAM VILLAGE OFFICE, NAYARAMBALAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.N.SUDHA DEVI FOR R1 & 2 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Contempt of Court Case No.1315/2009-S ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 21st day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 2. As per Annexure-I order, this Court had granted an interim stay as against the petitioner. Alleging violation of the same, this Contempt of Court Case was filed. 3. The respondents have filed an affidavit as directed by this Court. In paragraph (5) it is pointed out that no steps have been taken against 10 cents possessed by the petitioner in R.S.Nos.65/16 and 65/17. It is pointed out that the petitioner is not at all affected by the auction conducted in R.S.Nos.65/12 and 65/18 also. The same is recorded and the Contempt of Court Case is closed. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms \\TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE