IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.9741-M of 2009 Date of Decision:17.5.2010 Sandeep Dhir .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. Mr. J.V. Yadav, Advocate for the complainant. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. The present petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.287 dated 1.12.2008 registered under Section 420 IPC and Section 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act at Police Station Sadar, Phagwara. It is not disputed by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State on instructions from HC Ishro Singh that the petitioner has since joined the investigation. Accordingly, order dated 8.4.2009 is made absolute and the petition is allowed as such. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that document Annexure P-1, which has been placed on record by the petitioner, is required for being produced before the trial Court. Accordingly, Registry is directed to hand over the document Annexure P-1 to the learned counsel for the petitioner subject to a certified copy being placed on record. 17.5.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE