THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA C.R.P. No. 4882 of 2009 O r d e r: This C.R.P. is directed against the order dated 15.09.2009, passed by the V Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, dismissing the application in I.A. No. 623 of 2009 in O.S. No. 825 of 2001, filed by the petitioner, praying to send Exs. A1 to A13 to the Director, Finger Prints Bureau, CID, DIG Officer Complex, IV Floor, Nampaly, for comparison of the same with the admitted thumb impressions of defendant No.2 on the suit summons, vakalat and written statement and specimen thumb impressions to be obtained from him in the Court. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the order under revision. The petitioner-plaintiff filed the suit for specific performance of agreement of sale dated 15.05.1995. Respondents-defendant Nos. 1 and 2 in their written statement, admitted the execution of the agreement of sale, but denied issuance of the receipts. Admittedly, the evidence in the suit is over. The petitioner-plaintiff to substantiate his claim, examined five witnesses, including the attested witnesses of the agreement of sale. The receipts in question were also confronted to the witnesses, and the evidence in that regard is available on record. Since defendant Nos. 1 and 2 admitted to the execution of the agreement of sale, and considering the fact that the petitioner-plaintiff adduced substantial evidence, by examining five witnesses, including the attested witnesses, and since the opinion of the Finger Print Expert is only a corroborative piece of evidence, the Court below felt that it is not necessary to send the documents in question, namely receipts, to a Finger Print Expert for comparison of the signatures thereon with that of the signatures available on the Court documents, and no exception can be taken thereto, for the reason that the Court has ample power to examine the veracity of the same after arguments in the suit is concluded. In the above view of the matter, I find no reason whatsoever to interfere with the order under revision in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The C.R.P. is devoid of merit, and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: October, 2009 KSR