6 (L<?1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^^SS /2010 PETITIONER: Itwar Singh Thakur, Aged about - 59 years, S/o - Gandharv Singh Thakur, Presently Working as - Head Master, Boys Middle School, Chhurikala, District - Korba (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: ,...^1' o...<7v ^ U<''I>\ .^ ^^i^y 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG) 2. The Commissioner, Adim Jati & Anusuchit Jati Vikas, Raipur (CG) 3. The Assistant Commissioner, Adivasi Vikas, Korba, District - Korba (CG) 4. ThePrincipal, Higher Secondaiy School Chhuri, District - Korba 5. Smt. Lata Diwan, Presently posted at Boys Middle School, Chhurikala, District - Korba (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ :-HC—78 Hi^w^pfl^ ^ST ^Nl^l^, ^Tll-M4l<o, fsjdiyy ^...iL^.£.CS/.A.....2SZ5.^200 3'H^T 'R^F ( ^t^<^?) ^n^r^T'f^NT ^T^TT ^TI^T s^frii<^ |NN»i^r ^^TWH^STT^? 8B: Hon^ble Sluri Manindra UIohAn Shrlvastava, J. 8.7.2010 Shn Goutain Bhaduri, coui] Shri Bhaskar Payasi, Paa( No. 1 to 4^ on advaace copy, Heaid. coiEinsel Subndssion of learaed order dated 2.7.2008 (Amiexure posted ia Middle School- Chuni petitioner joiaed at Churri on 4.7| P-3). However, one Dayashankar petitioner, on account of which, School -Birda. Later on, tihie fher| petitioner to continue at Chijirri Dayashaakar has been promotedj duties aad workiag as Head Mas| facts were brought to fhe not^e representation dated 30.4,20^. considermg it, fhe impugned ord^r been passed, whereby, respond4 School, Churd, where fhe petitiori ^T^Nt^T 'RPT^f ^* fecst> Tfa^K '^^H3?I^T Isel for the petitioner. |l Lawyer for fhe State/respondents for fhe petitioner is fhat vide 1P-2), petitioner was traasferred and ^nd ia compUaace of fhe said order, .2008 vide letter ofjomiag (Annexure |Sahu was transferred ia place of the fhe petitioner was posted ia Middle Assistant Commissioner allowed the along wifh Dayashaakar. As petitioner is actuaUy dischargiag the Ler ia Middle School-Churri. AU fhese of Assistant Comniissioner vide .0 (Annexure P-6) but without rdated 18.6.2010 (Annexurc P-1) has nt No.5 has been posted at Middle er isworking. '^. ^r^^z :'f g' "" ^ 1 s^";?:'t ^ -^ ^—-/'XI-HC—78 '^--." ^-^Y~ • - '^•"^?,^"' sc -3^r ^TRT^R, ^xil^^Ko, "f^Tray WNW ^*l!sh 3?I^T ^q^^ (^i^®3^) 3;?Y^T ^T f^te '<?^TF 3T???T^RW IB»N»N^ Praveen i^wt^rftn ^^ -z- Taking into consideration ti4c of fhe circumstaiices, it would fc|e No.S/Assistaat Commissioner to submission made aad fhe totalily appropriate to direct respondent c<j>nsider petitioner's representation, direcled Accordmgly, it is Commissioner, ^idivasi Vikas, jrepresentation dated 30.4.2010 (4m: |decision wifh regard to the claim o| [weeks from fhe date ofreceipt ofc^py fhat respondent No.S/Asst. JKorba shall consider petitioner^s 3|nnexure P-6) aad take appropriate fhe petitioner, wifhm a period of 3 offhis order. As aay decision may adver^ jpassmg aay order on petitioner Jalso be heard. ^ely affect respondent No.5, before re{)resentation, respondent No.5 shaU Wifh the aforesaid direction, loff. ^ET^feT^T 'HTR^ff ^f ft^ Tf^5K ^affw^n^T the petition stends fi^ally disposed Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge +