-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. (1) Arb.Petition No. 293 of 2007 with (2) Arb.Petition No.294 of 2007 Inderjit Kapur ..Petitioner vs. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. ..Respondents Mr. V.L.Shah for petitioner. Mr.P.N.Sutar i/b Ms.S.I.Shah for respondents. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J 19th September,2007 19th September,2007 19th September,2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. In the light of the decision of the Supreme Court in the matter of Pune Cantonments Board and another Vs. M.P.J.Builders and another reported in A.I.R.1996 S.C.2645, both sides do not dispute that arbitration petition is not a remedy to challenge the decision/action/award of the authorities. In the light of this legal position, the petitioner does not press these arbitration petitions which shall stand dismissed as not pressed but reserving liberty to take out appropriate proceedings to challenge the said decision. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.)