IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16479 of 2010 MAN.COMM.OF BHAGWAN BUDH PRIMARY TEACHER’S EDUCATION COLLEGE,BAJRAHIA, SIWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- For the Petitioner: Mr. Aditrya Narayan Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh, AC to GP 2 For the Board : Mr. Purnendu Singh, Advocate ---- 2. 02.11.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the respondents. The petitioner institution claims to have had recognition during the sessions 1983-1985 to 1988- 1990. Aggrieved by publication of a list of unrecognized institutions dated 7.4.1993 and which included the petitioner institution, some of the aggrieved came to this Court in CWJC No. 902 of 2009 and analogous cases disposed on 26.2.2009. It was contended that because of the blanket order of de-recognition those who have passed out from that institution in the aforesaid sessions shall be rendered ineligible to be considered for appointment of Block Teacher/ Panchayat Teacher illegally. The writ petition was allowed and the authorities were directed to permit those who have passed out from the petitioner institution in the aforesaid session to be considered for counseling. Consequential orders were then issued on 1.9.2009 by the respondents with reference to the order of this Court. Apparently it appears that the order of this Court attained finality after its acceptance by the respondents. The grievance now is that subsequent to the earlier publication dated 7.4.1993 annulled by the order of this Court as aforesaid, and prior to the issuance of the order dated 1.9.2009, the respondents have issued another list dated 3.12.2008 directing by order dated 5.8.2010 not to consider the institutions mentioned therein and where the petitioner institution again finds place at serial 10. There is an obvious contradiction between the orders dated 1.9.2009 and 5.8.2010. If this Court has pronounced on the issue of recognition of the petitioner institution for the Session 1983-85 to 1988-90 quite obviously there does not appear prima facie to be justification in law for the list dated 3.12.2008 as circulated by letter dated 5.8.2010. Rather than requiring the respondents to file a counter affidavit, in the nature of the controversy and the earlier order of this Court, the matter is referred to the Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Government of Bihar to dispose off the petitioner’s representation dated 3.9.2010 raising the aforesaid issue within a maximum period of two weeks from the date of receipt and/or presentation of a copy of this order. Pending disposal of the application by the Principal Secretary, the respondents are duty bound to act in accordance with the order of this Court in CWJC No. 902 of 2009 and analogous cases, subject to the final decision of the Principal Secretary which in turn shall remain confined by the order of this Court referred to above unless set aside in appeal. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)