1 £ r CT<QW®Q ’w IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.No.443+ 2005 Petitioner ...............’K’Tukaram Dahare aged 46 yea‘rs Son of Chintaram Dahare Patwari P.C.N0.12. Tahsil and district Durg. - Versus /1. The State Government of Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, Revenue, Department, D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) / (2. The District Collector, Durg (C.G.) K, 3.’Tahsi1dar, Durg. 4. Shri Shesh Naran Patel, i / patwari P.C.No. 18 Tahsil Gunderdehi, District Durg. Respondents ......... / / Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. . XI—HC—22 'mw WW m‘m ,1 7-1 -2oos‘ I“ I , ' " g i ; ‘ PanellawyerfortheState. I ShriT.K.Tiwari,Adv.forres ‘lHeard. Learned counsel for the withdraw the petition with liberty competent authoritt} of the respondi‘ The petition is aocordinglyd to make a detailed representatic‘ competent authority. of the respon: and this order within two weeks fr . being filed, the competent authori same on its own merits in acco‘ preferably within two months representation. With the aforesaid observati Certined copy as per rules. Pathatd— v ‘ate, for the petitionér. . Advocate with ,Shri Vivek Sharma, pondents Nok. 4.’ petitioner states that he wants‘ to ‘to mak‘é a representation befove the ants. The prai/er is not opposed b‘y the counsei for otherside. Iispbsed of With iiberty to the petittorter m raising his grieyanees-before the tents aiong with a copy of the petitioh em today, and on such representatiort _ ty of‘the respondents shaii decide the 'dance with iaw as early as possible from the date of receipt- of the ons, this petition stands dispesed of. Sdl- ‘ Fakhruddin Judge ? ép r \e" A3 '1[‘ii%éf‘@13 Shti Ajay Shrivestava, Advod‘ Shri'Sandeep Dubey, Govt g H