3A Ami: HIGH COURT O? CEHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No. 4488 0f2009 13ET1’I‘EONER : Rajjak. Ali S/o Laie Mailub Ali. aged about 32 years, Pjo H59, {:Tigation Colony, Shanti Nagzu“, Raipur, Districi Raipur {CG} VERSUS RES?ONDENT : Regional Transpm't Authcrity, Jagdaipur (CG) WRIT PETI’HON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTEON OF INDIA SB: Half§3i£ Sm'i Satish K. Agnihotri. J. a Shri S; mosh Guiata: Advocate for the petitioner. S‘mi Amn Sac, G xremem Ad‘xrocaia with Shri Shashank Thakur, ?anei Lawyer for the State/respondent. €jRs)ER g0RAL‘) l Ar" A {Passed oi: 29‘ a v August 2009) Heard learned couiisei for the parties. Leamed counsei appearing for the peiition'en 03a insimetions, submits that the petitiener does not Wan‘L ‘io eomest ihis petition on meriiS ai this stage. However, the respondent may be directed to consider and decide his pending application dated 27m December, 2098 (Annexure P/l) in accordance Wi‘ih law, on its own mex‘its, as exjoeditiousiy as possible Shri Sac: learned Govermnent Advocaee appearing for the Szate/i‘esponden‘i submiis iha‘i the abeve—staied appiication has already been considered and awaiting decision by the concerned authority, in accordance wi‘xh law, (m its own merits, The order may be passed / . ‘7; ‘ Present: exoeditiousiy. In view of the eiear statemerit made by 1earned counsel appearing for the reseoodents, according to leamed counsei appearing for the petitioner: nothing remains to be adjudicateti. Accordingly: the petition is disposed of. r Sd/- ‘ Satish K. Agnihotri'l, Judge \6%\0Cf i