IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 16720 of 2008 Decided on: 04.10.2010 B.N. Jaswal …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner. : None. For the respondent : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : In sequel to order dated 02.08.2010, the intimation has been sent to the petitioner for today. However, neither the petitioner is present in person nor represented by any counsel. 2. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed for non- prosecution, so also the pending application(s). However, the liberty is reserved to revive the same as and when the appropriate application is moved. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge October 4, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?