1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3380 OF 2007. (Smt. Niramala Laxminarayan Pashine Vs. Additional Municipal Commr.& oth.) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Shri C.S.Samudra, Advocate for Petitioner. CORAM : A.H.JOSHI AND R.C.CHAVAN, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 21, 2007. 1. Learned Advocate Shri S.K. Mishra, who appears for respondents No.1 to 3, makes statement, on the basis of instructions, that notice Annexure-A page-17 was intended for giving warning / caution to the petitioner while removing dilapidated portion petitioner herein/ noticee should be vigilant. There is no decision or design to demolish the portion in occupation of the petitioner. 2. In view of this statement the learned Advocate Shri Samudra states that the petitioner is satisfied with the statement and it is not necessary to pursue the petition for any further reliefs. 2 3. In view of above statement, the petition is disposed of. JUDGE. JUDGE. RR.