m THE HON'BLE HiGH COURT OF CHHATT8SGARH AT BSLASPUR (C.G.) W.P.fC) No. ?"^3 of 2011 <p- VERSUS Roprendra Lodhi, aged about 26 years, S/o ishwar Prasad Lodhl, Bus Operator, Station Road, Raipur(C.G.) p.^- RESPONDENT ...^M. 'S^J^^ >.A--'" Regional Trahsport Authority, Raipur(C.G-) .^"^'^^^>. /^ .^13^^^Y // ^'," ~ r v PETITION ARTICLE 226 OF THE ^ ^—^ —.,« ^"/"...-.\, II ^^•1 '^ CONSTITUTSON OF 1NDIA 'foflowing is most respectfully submitted on behalf of the petltioner:- ,^'. HTOH COIJRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BITASPUR PETmONER WRIT PETITION (€.}No. 5683 of2011 B-oopreiidra Lodbi. RE-SPONDENTS VERS'US Regional Transport A.iithority, Raipiir, WRIT PETITION LTNDER .^RIICLE 226 OF THE CONSlTruTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Ne Siiri Satisit K. Agnthotri, J. i Pre.sent: Shri BJ' ..Dembra. Advocate fbr the petitioner. Sliri Aiuii Sao, Govenmieail Advoca.ie wilh Sliri ShashaiA Thakyn Panel La.w^erforttie State. O R 3) E R (Passed on 23rd day ofSeptember, 2011) 1, The grievaiice ofthe petitioner is ttiat on 02.04.2011 (Annexiire P/l'l the petitioBer moved a.n applicatioii before the respondent. for gra.nt ofre,giila.r stage ca-rria-ge peiinit on tlie roirte Cfaliuiklia.da.n to Raipiir via LIdaypiir, AIiaria, Dhamdha, Ahiw^ra., Raip'ur and 'two smgle trip daily, However, till date, tfae ha.s u<X been decided by the respondents, 2, Leamed coixnsel for the petitioner submits &a:t this petition ma-y be disposed ofwith a direction to liie respoiideiit to ^iecide tlie said application expeditiousiy. 3, Leamed coimsel appearing fbr &e that the application of the petit.iorAer shall be considered aiid decided, m accorda.nce with law a.nd on it.s owii merits, wit.hm a period of 10 weeks formthe of.receipt. ofa. copy ofthis order. 4, Tn view of the fDregoing, ttds petition is disposed of with a direction to Ifae respondent to decide the application dated 02.04,2011 (Aimexure P/l) filed by ihe petitioiwn wrthin a period ' of 10 weeks fromthe date ofreceipt ofa coiw oftbis order, Ainit Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge