IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13859 of 2011 LALU RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 30.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation in the First Information Report is that five named persons came to the door of the informant and started abusing her. The reason of the dispute was that the informant had asked them why they had cut the ridge of field which resulted in further abuse and they started throwing bricks on the informant. They also hit the grand son of the informant with bricks which resulted in his death on 25.07.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the occurrence took place on 23.07.2010 and the grand son died on 25.07.2010 at Parsa hospital. It is submitted that the First Information Report was not instituted on 23.07.2010 when the occurrence took place and it was only after his death that this case has 2 been instituted. It is further submitted that the case is false and fabricated and in fact no such occurrence has taken place. In order to support the submissions aforesaid, counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no external injury in the postmortem report. The doctor has found that there is perforation in the large intestine and has opined that the death took place due to the injuries caused by hard blunt substance. Considering the short period of custody, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner for the present. However, the petitioner, above named, may renew his prayer for bail after six months from today. Safik (Sheema Ali Khan,J.)