“319% HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CORAM: Hon’ble Shri Sunil Kumar Sinha & Hon’ble Shri Radh’e Shvam Sharma,JJ. W.A. No. 36312011 APPELLANTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through- Secretary, Department of Panchayat & Rural Deveiopment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Collector, ‘ Ambikapur. District Sarguja, (C.G.). The Biock Education Officer, Sitapur, District Surguja (C.G.). The Headmaster, Govt. Primary School Patelpara, Sitarpu, District Surguja (C.G.). Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. Chief Executive Ofticer, Janpad Panchayat Sitapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS RESPONDENT Suman Gupta, /W/o Sanjay Kumar Gupta, aged about 33 years, Shiksha Karmi Grade-I”, Govt. Primary School Patelpara, Sitapur, R/o Viiiage Girhuidih, Tahsii Sitapur, District Surguja (CG) i WRIT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2 OF THE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT (APPEAL TO DIVISION BENCH), ACT, 2006 Appearance: Mr. Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Advocate General for the State/appenants. ORAL ORDER (08.08201 1) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA,J.‘ Heard. The State and authorities of the State have fiied this appeal against the order dated‘ 19'“ April, 2011 passed in writ petition (S) No. > 2376/20m by the learned Single Judge of this Court. Mr. Y.S. Thakur submits that almost a similar order was passed in WP. (S) No. 2683/2011 on 13.05.2011. Against the said order dated 36212011, which came up for hearing on 1st 13.05.2011. the State and the authorities concern fiied Writ appeal No. August. 2011 and was i dismissed by a coordinate bench of this Court, making certain observations in the order dated 1" August, 201 1. w A7 Na. 363i2011 Mr. Thakur has furnished a copy of the order dated 1" August, i 2011 from which we gathered that one of us i;e. Mr. Radhe‘Shyam er of that bench, which dismissed the appeal. at i Sharma. J was a memb the motion stage After hearing learned counsel for the appellants, we are of the View that we do not find any good ground to take a different View than the View earlier taken by the coordinate division bench of this Court. The writ appeal, therefore, is dismissed in terms of the order dated 15‘ August, 2011 passed in Writ appeal No. 362/201 1. ’V Sd/- _ SUN-IL KUMAR SNHA sdl,_ : , Judge i Radhe Shyam Sharma n r W V V i . .\ Judge r _ / _ _r.l‘ 3 ’i Rahul w v