IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL, TWO THOUSAND NINE PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.8055 of 2006 Between: V. Ganapathi ..... Petitioner AND The Commissioner of Handloom and Textiles, Govt., of A.P., Hydeabad & others. .....Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri Eathakota Venkat Rao Counsel for respondent No.3: Sri P. Chakravarthy for Sri O. Manohar Reddy This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.8055 of 2006 ORDER:- At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed questioning order dated 08.11.2005 issued by respondent No.3, whereby the petitioner is placed under suspension. At the hearing, Sri P. Chakravarthy representing Sri O.Manohar Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.3 invited my attention to the averments contained in the additional counter- affidavit dated 08.10.2006 filed by his client, wherein it is stated that during the pendency of this writ petition, a final order was passed after completion of enquiry on 07.10.2006 dismissing the petitioner from service. No reply affidavit is filed by the petitioner controverting this averment. Inasmuch as the writ petition is filed questioning the suspension order pending enquiry and the final order of dismissal has been passed, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to question the final order of dismissal at his option. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, WPMP.Nos.10316, 10317 and 10318 of 2006 are disposed of as infructuous. _____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 29.04.2009 ES