IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.8334 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.01.2011 Sh. Charanjit Singh . . .Petitioner Versus R.D. Mittal . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.P.K. Kukreja, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in terms of the impugned order, rent has already been deposited. Therefore, this revision has become infructuous. However, he submits that the question whether the respondent was entitled to receive the rent or not that question may be decided by the Rent Controller on merits. I order accordingly. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) January 20, 2011 JUDGE vivek