IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.9358 of 2008. Decided on: 22.12.2010. Dr.Anil Malhotra. ……….Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh. ……….Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Mr. Radhey Shyam Gautam, Advocate. For the respondent. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate No. General with Mr.J.S.Guleria, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Mr. Radhey Shyam, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous with the passage to time. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 22, 2010. (krt) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.