^ ' si s' .c ' -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P. N0. fl^°8 /2005LS.B.) PETITIONER / VIJAY KUMAR BARETH, S/oSADANNAND BARETH, O- ^ (4ged about 42 years, \' >, )ccupation- peon, in office of Mahila 85 ^ ^ ^*1^.^"*"V.JBal Vikash Pariyojna Pousser , y>-v"^...-"*"R/oPousser Raigarh -^"^>.<- ^'" ^.."•••"......^ Tahsil & Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). ^^^"'^ ^^ ^ RESPONDENTS 1. 2. ^^.,..'^ ^ ^ 3. ^^-^/i 4- '^^"^^,^ VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Mahila 85 Bal Vikash Pariyojna D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.) District Working Officer Mahila & Bal Vikash Pariyojna Collectorete Raigarh (C.G.) Development Officer Mahila 85 Bal Vikash Pariyojna Poussar Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. XI-HC-22 3TT^T^T f^f^3TI^T $hHi<=b^rf?cT k ^r^ 3^T ^ll^ltrl-M, y>Tfl<i<i(o, {sidl^y ^.ss;.... ^WWT $b^ |cn ' ----^-- - - - ^ 200 i^l' 3TI^T5^TTW^f?cr 11.4.2005 Shri Vivek Kumar Pande^ Shri Bhaskar Pyasi/Pan^l Lawyer for the State. The petitioner's case is t^at he was appointed as Peon in the office of Naveen Bal Vikash Pariyozna P{3usser, Raigai'h on 22.11.1989. Thereafter, in the yearl996 a promotion li the persons junior to the petitit>ner have been promoted but the petitioner has not been promoted. Aggriej^ed by that order the petitioner has filed an O.A. No. 1730/99 before the St^te Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur, from where said OA has been transflen'ed to SAT, Raipur and now SAT, Raipur has already been abolished anB State Government has issued notification that all the pending matters therefore, that OA be withdrawr^ Learned counsel for thel grievances and respondent No.^ which learned counsel for the n the facts and circumstances of representatipn within a period raising all his grievances and i^ the grievances raised by the petj: withdrawn and this writ petitio3|i Certified copy as per rul^s. cni^Ici41vi ^i^^T^te^^^K ^3:rf^TT3Tl^?T , counsel for the petitioner. t was issued by respondent No.2 in which n the SAT shall be heard by this Court, to this Court. petitioner submits that petitioner may be allowed to make a representjation to respondent No.3 raising all his be directed to decide his representation, to spondent has no objection. Having heard learned cjounsel for the parties and having regard to |the case, the petitioner is allowed to make a |3f two weeks from today to respondent No.3 TL turn respondent No,3 is directed to decide the representation of the petitij^ner in accordance with law within another three months from the date of ^eceipt of representation after considering all tioner. In view of this, 0,A. T^o, 1730/99 pending before SAT, Raipur is 8& O.A.-No. 1730/99 stands disposed of. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge