{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3076 OF 2010 Dattatrya Chaburao Sakhare & others APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra RESPONDENT ....... Mr. V.D.Salunke, Advocate for the applicants Mr. S.G.Nandedkar, APP for respondent State ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 12th August 2010 PER COURT: 1. By the present criminal application, the applicants have prayed to release them on bail in connection with CR No. 46/2010 registered with Pimpalner police station, Dist-Beed, as they are arrested on 9th July 2010 and now they are in magisterial custody. As the application preferred by the applicants before the lower court is rejected, they are before this Court seeking bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants followed by learned APP. Perused the papers of investigation. {2} 3. Perusal of the complaint does not show name of the first applicant. Though the FIR discloses names of applicants No.2 and 3, yet there are sweeping allegations against them. Perusal of the statements of the eye witnesses, recorded during the investigation, does not show that any over tact is alleged against them other than their presence at the spot of incident at the relevant time. As there are no specific allegations against the applicants either in the complaint or in the statement of eye witnesses recorded during the investigation and as the applicants are in jail for more than 30 days, case is made out to enlarge the applicants on bail. 4. In the result, the application is allowed. The applicants be released on bail on their furnishing surety in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- each and on executing PR bond in the like amount, if not required in any other offence. Applicants are directed not to contact the prosecution witnesses. The applicants are further directed to attend the concerned police station on every Sunday between 12.00 noon and 3.00 p.m. till filing of the charge sheet. Application stands disposed of accordingly. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/B10/criapln3076-10