IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.53791 of 2007 MULLA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03/ 15.05.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is an accused for an offence punishable under section 395 of Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that neither he is named in the first information report nor any incriminating material has been recovered from him nor he has been put to the test identification parade although he is in custody since 12.10.2007. He further submits that the petitioner has been implicated on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Md. Mukhtar alias Mukhtar Alam, but the said co-accused has already been enlarged on bail on the order of this Court dated 23.01.2004 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 33824 of 2003. Considering the facts and circumstances, this petition for bail is allowed. Accordingly, let the sole petitioner, namely, Mulla be admitted to bail on executing bail bond of Rs.10,000.00(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea, in connection with Khajanchi Hat P.S. Case No. 107 of 2003. MPS/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )