IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID MONDAY, THE 16TH JUNE 2008 / 26TH JYAISHTA 1930 LA.App..No. 56 of 2007() ------------------------ LAR.306/1997 of ADDL.SUB COURT,KOLLAM .................... APPELLANT: RESPONDENTS ---------------------- THE STATE OF KERALA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED ANSAR K.J. RESPONDENTS: CLAIMANTS ---------------------- 1. KUTTAPAN (DIED), KUMARAMANGALAM, MANGAD P.O., KOLLAM. 2. ANANDAVALLY (DIED), KUMARAMANGALAM, MANGAD P.O., KOLLAM. 3. SUNANDA DEVI (DIED), KUMARAMANGALAM, MANGAD P.O., KOLLAM. 4. HAREENDRA BABU (DIED), S/O.KUTTAPPAN, KUMARAMANGALAM, MANGAD P.O., KOLLAM. 5. USHAKUMARI, AGED 56 YEARS, D/O.KUTTAPPAN, KOCHUPALLIYIL HOUSE, ERAVIPURAM P.O. 6. PRASANNA BABU, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O.KUTTAPPAN, KUMARAMANGALAM, MANGAD P.O., KOLLAM. 7. JAYA RAJ, AGED 53 YEARS, S/O.KUTTAPPAN, KUMARAMANGALAM, MANGAD P.O., KOLLAM. 8. RAJU, AGED 49 YEARS, S/O.KUTTAPPAN, KUMARAMANGALAM, MANGAD PO, KOLLAM. 9. AJITHA, 46 YEARS, D/O.KUTTAPPAN, KUMARAMANGALAM, MANGAD P.O., KOLLAM. 10. BEENA, 44 YEARS, D/O.KUTTAPPAN, KUMARAMANGALAM, MANGAD P.O., KOLLAM. 11. NAINA, 42 YEARS, D/O.KUTTAPPAN, KUMARAMANGALAM, MANGAD P.O., KOLLAM. 12. ROHINI, AGED 30 YEARS, D/O.LATE SUNANDA DEVI, GOURI BHAVAN, KILIKOLLOOR P.O., KOLLAM. 13. SMT.P.VASANTHY BABU, AGED 49 YEARS, W/O.LATE HAREENDRA BABU, LEGAL HEIRS OF THE DECEASED. BY ADV. SRI.S.SUDHEESHKAR FOR R1 TO 4 SRI.S.SUDHEESHKAR FOR R1 TO 4&6 TO 9 THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: KURIAN JOSEPH & HARUN-UL-RASHID, JJ. ---------------------------------------------- C.M.Appln.No.71/07 & L.A.A.NO.56 of 2007 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 16th June, 2008. J U D G M E N T This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree in LAR 306/97 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Kollam. It is submitted that the relied on judgment in LAR 64/96 on the file of the said court has become final. Therefore, it is not necessary to condone the delay and consider the matter on merits. The delay petition as well as the appeal are dismissed. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE. tgs KURIAN JOSEPH & HARUN-UL-RASHID, JJ ---------------------------------------------- L.A.A. NO.56 OF 2007 ---------------------------------------------- J U D G M E N T Dated 16th June, 2008.