IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.7121 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision 20.01.2011 Nand Lal ...... Petitioner VERSUS Food Corporation of India, Amritsar and others ...... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Vijay Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Punita Sethi, Advocate, for Mr.Rajesh Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J: The petitioner has invoked the powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the orders dated 19.11.2009 (Annexure P-9), 28.10.2009 (Annexure P-6) and 02.09.2009 (Annexure P-5), passed by the Executing Court. On perusal of the impugned order dated 19.11.2009, it appears that before issuing the warrants of arrest, the Court has not adopted the procedure as laid down under Section 51 and Order 21 Rule 11(a) CPC. The impugned orders appears to be non-speaking. In these circumstances, the present petition is allowed and the impugned orders are quashed. However, the Executing Court would be at liberty to pass the fresh speaking order, observing if the petitioner deserves to be sent to civil imprisonment. However, before issuing any order of detention, the Court would follow the procedure as laid down under the relevant provisions of Section 51 and Order 21 Rule 11(a) CPC. The Executing Court also would be at liberty to put his property to sale in order to execute the decree. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 20.01.2011 mamta-II