WPMS 849/2001 (Old No. 42712/1992) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Heard Sri S.S. Chauhan, learned Counsel for the petitioners, Sri H.M. Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no. 1 & 2 and Sri A.V. Pundir, learned Counsel for the respondent no. 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners are in possession of the land in dispute, which was duly allotted. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents states that the petitioners are trespassers and are liable to be evicted from the land in dispute. Accordingly, notice was issued under Section 122-B of the U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act. The courts below held that the petitioners are in unauthorized possession and ordered for eviction along with the damages. Since the finding has been recorded by the revisional court that the disputed land has now been vested in Town Area Committed and, therefore, provisions of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act are not applicable. This factual position remains undisputed. Therefore, impugned orders are liable to be set aside on this ground. Accordingly, writ petition is allowed. Impugned orders dated 30.7.1992 and 30.8.1991, in respect of the petitioners, are quashed. However, it is open for the Town Area Committee to evict the petitioners in accordance with law. (P.C.V.,J.) 22.7.2008 Prabodh