IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN FRIDAY, THE 24TH JUNE 2011 / 3RD ASHADHA 1933 CRP.No. 879 of 2006 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 9.12.2004 IN ELEOP.115/2003 OF ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, THODUPUZHA REVN. PETITIONER: RESPONDENT THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE J.MATHEIKEL, SC, KSEB SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER 1. M.K.PRABHAKARAN PILLAI, S/O.LATE KRISHNA PILLAI, MANNAMKUNNEL HOUSE, KUDAYATHOOR KARA, VELLIYAMATTOM VILLGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK, IDUKKI. (DIED - LRS. IMPLEADED) 2. THANKAMMA, W/O.M.K.PRABHAKARAN PILLAI, -DO-, -DO-, -DO-. (DIED - LRS. IMPLEADED) 3. RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI, S/O.PRABHAKARAN PILLAI, -DO-, -DO-, -DO-. ADDL.R4 TO R7 IMPLEADED: 4. M.G.GOPALA PILLAI, S/O.LATE M.K.PRABHAKARAN PILLAI, MANNAMKUNNEL HOUSE, KUDAYATHOOR KARA, VELLIYAMATTAM VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK. 5. M.P.RAJALEKSHMY. D/O.LATE M.K.PRABHAKARAN PILLAI, MANNAMKUNNEL HOUSE, KUDAYATHOOR KARA, VELLIYAMATTAM VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK. 6. M.P.JAYASREE, D/O.LATE M.K.PRABHAKARAN PILLAI, MANNAMKUNNEL HOUSE, KUDAYATHOOR KARA, VELLIYAMATTAM VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK. 7. M.P.MINIMOL, D/O.LATE M.K.PRABHAKARAN PILLAI, MANNAMKUNNEL HOUSE, KUDAYATHOOR KARA, VELLIYAMATTAM VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK. LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2 ARE IMPLEADED AS ADDL.R4 TO R7 AS PER THE ORDER DATED 24/6/2011 IN IA.3146/2010. R3 TO R6 BY SENIOR ADV. SRI.K.K.CHANDRAN PILLAI SRI.A.S.SAJUSH PAUL SRI.THOMAS JAMES MUNDACKAL SRI.BOBBY THOMAS THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ORDERS ON 24/06/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------------------------------ C.R.P. NO. 879 OF 2006 E ------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 24th day of June, 2011 O R D E R On 10.2.2011, the learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the matter was settled in the Adalath. The Standing Counsel for the Kerala State Electricity Board prays for further time to verify the facts. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents that the matter is settled, the Civil Revision Petition is closed. If it is found that the matter is not settled, the petitioner would be entitled to file a memo within a period of one month stating so, in which case, the Civil Revision Petition shall be restored to file. (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/