IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.2587 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:21.04.2011. Lal Chand ...Petitioner Versus Murti Devi ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Binderjit Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 01.04.2011 passed by the learned Rent Controller, Bathinda by which provisional rent has been assessed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the provisional rent has been wrongly assessed @ `9,000/- per month w.e.f. 01.07.2007 and @ `9,900/- per month w.e.f. 01.07.2010, on the basis of some rent receipts which have now been placed on record by him in order to show the rate of rent, whereas he has conceded that the said rent receipts were not brought to the notice of the learned Rent Controller. In these circumstances, it can be very safely inferred that the rent receipts were not in existence at the time when the impugned order was passed. Be that as it may, the learned Rent Controller has taken into account the rent note dated 01.07.2007 according to which the rent was fixed @ `9,000/- per month. In view of the above, I do not find any error in the impugned order which is provisional in nature and hence, this revision petition is hereby dismissed in limine though without any order as to costs. April 21, 2011 ( Rakesh Kumar Jain ) vinod* Judge