IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 11TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 22ND MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 4506 of 2011(K) -------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- RESHMY ABHAYADEV,WIFE OF RANJITH, AGED 32 YEARS, HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (MALAYALAM) ST.JOHN HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, MATTOM, THATTARAMBALAM, MAVELIKKARA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695014. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688001. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MAVELIKKARA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-690101. 5. THE MANAGER, ST.JOHNS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, MATTOM, THATTARAMBALAM, MAVELIKKARA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-690101. R1 TO R4 BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 4506 of 2011-K - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 11th day of February, 2011. JUDGMENT The petitioner is working as H.S.A.(Malayalam) from 1.6.2009 in the school managed by the fifth respondent. Ext.P1 is the copy of the staff fixation order issued by the District Educational Officer for the year 2009- 2010. Ext.P2 is the revised staff fixation order issued, extending the benefit of 1 : 40 teacher student ratio. It appears that there were visits by the Super Check Cell on two occasions, viz. on 4.11.2009 and 25.2.2010. After the visits, Ext.P5 order has been issued by the Director of Public Instruction reducing one division each in Standards V, VIII and IX and one post of UPSA, two posts of HSAs and one post of has (Malayalam). The petitioner has raised various contentions in this writ petition. According to the petitioner, some of the admissions which are noted as bogus, are of the students who are actually studying in the school. Challenging Ext.P5 order, the petitioner has filed Ext.P6 revision petition before the Government. It is also pointed out that the approval of appointment of the petitioner has been rejected by Ext.P7 order. 2. There will be a direction to the Government to take a decision on wpc 4506/2011 2 Ext.P6 with notice to the petitioner and the Manager, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the first respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/