IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.7568 of 2005 Between: U.Raja Kishore, s/o Dhanaiah, r/o LIG-109/7, III PHASE, KPHB Colony, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Govt of A.P., rep., by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad-4. 2 Station House Officer, Thorrur P.S., Warangal District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent-2 in interfering with the life and liberty of the petitioner without the due process of law is illegal and unjust and violative of Art.21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent-2 not to interfere with the liberty of the petitioner and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.M.R.VELU Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.7568 of 2005 ORDER: It is the case of the petitioner that he has not involved in any crime at any point of time but the 2nd respondent sending police personnel in plain cloths from Thorrur Police Station of Warangal District to his residence at Hyderabad and enquiring about his whereabouts, while he was at Vijayawada from 24-03-2005 to 31-03-2005. On his return to his residence, his neighbours informed him that Thorrur police had come twice to arrest and take him away from Hyderabad to Thorrur. Therefore, the petitioner seeks to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in interfering with his personal life and liberty without following due process of law as illegal and arbitrary. Admittedly, the petitioner has not made any representation about the alleged illegal action of the 2nd respondent. Therefore, without making any complaint/representation before the superior officials about the alleged illegal action of the 2nd respondent, I am of the opinion that no Writ of Mandamus can be issued to the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 24-04-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RS}