IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20984 of 2010 CHITRA DEVI @ REENA DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 7.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner’s husband really if was entrusted to execute the construction work, only Rs.50,000/- was given to him, rest of the amount of rupees one lac was given to brick kiln owner and rupees one lac to owner of cement agency. Both the owners examined by the I.O. and corroborating about receiving of the amount as supply of materials which was partly used and partly kept. Raj Nandan Singh (husband of petitioner) was prevented to work due to differences in between teachers of the school, even there is no measurement about use of materials and estimated expense and petitioner is made accused in the case. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on 2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in Halsi P.S. Case No. 83/08, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)