IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 2ND NOVEMBER 2007 / 11TH KARTHIKA 1929 Con. Case(C).No. 1482 of 2007(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.18757/2006 Dated 18/07/2006 .................... PETITIONER: ------------- C.D. JAMES, S/O. DOMINIC, AGED 63 YEARS, RESIDING AT CHETTIVELIKKAKATH HOUSE SAUDI, MUNDAMVELI P.O., KOCHI. BY ADV. SRI.T.I.DANIEL SMT.T.P.VINITHA RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, VYDHYUTHI BHAVAN, TRIVANDRUM. 2. IVAN PHILIPOSE, AGED 45 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, THOPPUMPADY, KOCHI-5. 3. VEENA COILO, AGED 44 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, THOPPUMPADY, KOCHI-5. BY SRI.K.S.ANIL, SC THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Cont.Case(C).No.1482 of 2007-S = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 2nd day of November, 2007. JUDGMENT It was submitted on 1-11-2007 on behalf of the respondents that no document as Ext.P6 was received. Therefore, I do not find any ground to sustain this proceedings filed invoking the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act. However, it is directed that the compliance of the judgment shall be by considering any representation that the petitioner may place, following this judgment. This Contempt of Court Case is closed. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/