^f:. C F\'3-V ^) IN THE HIGH COURT^jF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.^No. /// / /200'Q- (S.B.) PETITIONER ..^v/^0. Smt. Rajiya Parbeen, y-"''',,^"" ..-••' W/o M.T. Aalam, aged about 40 ...-^%^^-""' ^yy'-''. •.^•^l'^7''.'^"'"" VERSUS years, R/o Bilaspur (C.G.; ^ RESPONDENTS r\ z ^p^\.^ .:\^-° ,ct5'\o ^x^\^ ^y~ \-^U.A ^y y- /\. State of Chhattisgarh , Through Secretary , Education Department , D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) /2. Director of public Instruction , Pensionbada Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2260F THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (5) No. illl of 2007 Petitioner Versus Smt. Rajiya Parbeen State of Chhattisgarh & another Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. rtr. Kumaredi Tiwari, Advocate for- the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Sovemment Advocate for -ttie /ressor ORDER O'assed on -riiis 26th t)ay of February, 2007) 1. Leamed counsei cppearing for tiie pefitioner submits tfiat the petitioner is working as Assistant Teacher/Lecturer. The petitioner obtained B. Ed. Examination certificate on 27-3-1996, on his own expenses. 2. Learned counsel oppearing for the petitioner ajbmits that the _question involved, herein asto whefner the teacher, B. Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses Is advance incrsments. 3. According to leamed counse! for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to two advance increments in view of the decision of this Court in the case of yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporotion, Qurg and another {2006 01) MPJR-C6 96). This Court in the case of Yaishwont Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipai Coryoration, Ourg and another (Supna), came to the concSusion that the teachers, who had obtained B. Ed. /B.T.I. Examination Certificate on their own -^*. expen^s, are covered by tiie circuiar dated 24.12.98 issued by the State Sovernment of Madhya Pradesh. 4. Learned counset for the petitioner further submits tiiat the facts and question of law involved in ttie present case are squarely covered by decision of this Court in the case of yaslwvant i&imar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporution, ESung and another (Supra), to which teamed coun»! dppearing for the respondents fairly concedes and agrees with the averment made by leamed counse! appearing for the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is aliowed in terms of the order passed in the case of yashwant Kumar B Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B. Ed. Examination Ceri-ificate on his own expenses as per the circuiars dated 24.12.1998 ». & 1.3.1999 ond further urfiether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. 5yfahash Sd/- SatishK.Agnihom Judge