kNNlN^ c^i^7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF .TTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W. P.(Sl N0.^2^6/2009 PETITIONER .^/ ^7 ^y^< .^/..^ ^/f/y .<^;. ,<^ s>' / ^ RESPONDENTS Prithvi Sen Tigga, S/o - Shri Julious Tigga, Vs> Aged about 46 years R/o Village - Karradand, Distt. Sarguja Presently working as Upper Division Teacher in, In Middle school Durgapur, Block - Preznnagar, Distt. Sarguja, Chhattisgarh, VERSUS 1- State of Chhattisgarh, Through - Secretary, Adim Jati 8& Anushuchit Jati Vikas Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, ^' 2- Collector, Ambikapur, Distt. - Sarguja, Chhattisgarh, 3- Block Education Officer, Kusmi, Distt. Sarguja C.G. WRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPMATE WmT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORAm ETC. 'C—78 3TI^T^?Jf^[W ^m3:n^i^^i^ ^ ^^r ^ii^id<L!, ^Ti1^i4i<o, [®!<ni<H^< . t^PS^ ^\>€>^ W^I^IS 5hN8^ 3^TTPRT ('ic<i^<(T) 'FTOR^ftH^II SB: Hon. Mr. Justice Ptitinker Diwaker 08.08.2009: Shri Neeraj Mehta counse) Shri Sumesh Bajaj GA for | Challenge in this petitior| passed by respondent No.1 by as Upper Division Teacher in M| Nagar, has been transferred to| Education officer. Contention of the couns^ present place of posting the after being promoted by contention is that wife of the pef| and is working as Shiksha K^ Doomarpali, Block Prem Nagar. Counsel for the petitioner make a suitable concerned which would be dec^ proposition of the State counsel] his agreement. However, he pr^ representation of the petition< concerned. ^ ft^ ^N^R .'^'3tfOT3^T for the p^itioner. |he respondents/State. is to the order dated 30.6.2009 1/vhich the petitioner who is working |ddle School Durgapur, Block Prem Kusmi on the option of the Block ^l for the petitioner is that in the p^titioner had joined on 13.10.2008 dated 7.10.2008. His further tioner is also a govemment servant |rmi Grade III in Primary School, responpents/State submits that let the i|epresentation to the authortties |ed in accordance with law. To this counsel for the petitioner showed |ys for an interim protectjon till the ^r is decided by the authorities orcfler 'ta-^ -4- ^ ^-':^ "g^ -^iiqi^q^ ^Tl1<H41^/ [^^11H^< 'STPTW^^W •-^200 3i7T^?T^I'ft^W 'cCT 3??^T^RW 3ff^TTT5RT(1^t3^?) Accordingly, the petition is the petitioner makes a representation to the authorities concerned within a period of 10 days from order. the authorities conceme^ further period of three weeks frorr •WifeNh Tnq?ff-if fe^ ^R?R ^^RR^i^T disposed of with a direction that if the date of receipt of copy of this shall decide the same within a the date of its receipt. Till then the order impugned shall be kept in ^beyance so far as it relates to the petitjoner. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge i^a^ Copy w^ o^-r *&^,^0.^03 m ^^m^^^ ^ the Sespft^^^t,..o') (^^)<^ <<?? ^- ^L. ^° 1f m^^^o^ ^s^tra- Sd/- A.R (J) ^L