IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATIS©ARH APPELLANTS: AT; BILASPUR ^-K2t1^67 BSI@ ^ROOS MCCNo. 4'2-~0f2008 SuitvaluedRs. 1,66,340.00. Court Fees payable Rs. 20,228.00. l^ Shyam Sunder alias Saurabh, aged 4 years, son ofLaxmi PrasadSahu, y Shubham, aged 3 years, son ofLaxmi Prasad Sahu, Both are minors, tfarough their natural guardian, the mother, Smt. Sunita Sahu, aged 29 years, wife ofLaxmi Prasad Sahu, residents of village Sonsari, at present Janjgir, tehsil & district Jaajgir-Champa (Chhattisgarh) . (Plaintiffs) VERSUS BIESPONDENTSs [. Kaushal Prasad Sahu, aged 75 years, son of Ram Pyare, at wesent residing at village Deori, P.0. Mongra, tehsil and ^?<iistrict Korba (C.G.), 2. Jiwanlal, aged 40 years, son ofKaushal Prasad Sahu, at present N.T.P.C. Power Plant Kati, N.T.P.C. Hostel, district Mujaffarpur (Bihar), ^ Koshir Prasad Sahu, aged 37 years, son ofKaushal Prasad, 4. Sushil Kumar, aged 35 years, son ofKaushal Prasad Sahu, ^-5, Laxmi Prasad, aged 32 years, son ofKaushal Prasad Sahu, '^' ^ _6. Sitaram Sahu, aged 28 years, son ofKaushal Prasad Sahu, /' " All are residents of village Sonsari, tehsil Pamgarh, district Janjgir-Champa (C.G.), 7. State of Chhattisgrh through the District Collector, Janjgir- Champa, at Janjgir (C.G.) (Defendants) APPLICATION UNDER ORDER 44 RULE 1 READ WITH ORDER 33 OF THE CODE OF GIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 FOR PERIWIISSION TO FILE APPEAL AS AN INDIGENTPERSONS. A^= HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR IVi.C.C. N0.42 OF 2008 2g; APPLSCANTS Shyam Sunder another Saurabh and RESPODENTS Versus Kaushai Prasad Sahu and others. hw— ApDiication under Order 44 Rule 1 read with Order 33 ofthe Code of Civij Procedure (SinaSe Bench: Hon'ble Shri N.K. Aaarwal. J.l Present: Shri Somnath Verma. counsel for the appiicants. Shri Hanuman Prasad Agrawal, counsel for respondents No. 1 to 6. Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No.7. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 7thday of FeKruary, 2011) Heard on application for permisslon to file an appeat as indigent persons under Order 44 Rule 1 read with Order 33 of the Code of Civi! Procedure Code, 1908. 2. Notices were issued to the parties. The matter was enquired by Additional Registrar (Judicial). As per report of Additional Reglstrar (Judiciai), the appiicants are having no means for payment of Court fees. 3. Taking into consideration the report of the Additional Registrar (Judicia!)^s'welJ as the facts that the applicants are minors, they are permitted to flle the appea! as indigent persons.' Therefore, M.C.C. is aiiowed. 4. Let the case be registered as First Appeal and !lst the matter thereafter, in the next week. Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge Kvr