IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Ist Bail Application No.406 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Balbir State of Uttarakhand Versus ..….Applicant (In Jail) …….Opposite party Dated: April 9, 2010 Arising out of Case Crime No.17 of 2010 Under Sections 420, 406, 120B, 504 and 506 of IPC P.S. Raipur, District Dehradun Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Sri S.K. Shandiliya, Advocate i/b Mr. Karan Anand, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Amit Bhatt, learned Additional G.A. for the State and also perused the record. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the FIR of the said incident is lodged after three years and the agreement of sale on the basis of which the said FIR has been lodged is an unregistered document which is not admissible as per law. He further argued that the dispute between the parties is purely of civil nature. It is pleaded that the applicant is in jail since last three months and that the co-accused Anil Kumar has been released on bail by the order of this Court dated 1.4.2010 and the present applicant is also entitled for bail on the basis of parity. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after going through the papers on record, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant-Balbir be released on bail on his executing personal bond and also on furnishing two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Dehradun. The bail application is disposed of accordingly. Prabodh (Dharam Veer, J.) 09.04.2010