1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 634 OF 2009 Ramrao Sopanrao Kamble, Age 43 years, Occu.Nil, R/o Bhise Wagholi, Taluka and District Latur .. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra (through its Secretary), Employment & Self Employment Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai 32 2. The Director of Employment & Self Employment District Konkan Bhawan, New Mumbai 3. The Collector, Latur 4. The Employment & Self Employment Office, Osmanabad 5. The Tahsildar, Tahsil Office, Latur .. Respondents Shri S.B.Rohile, Advocate for petitioners Shri N.N.Jadhav, AGP for respondents 1 to 5 CORAM : P.V.HARDAS AND R.K.DESHPANDE, JJ DATE : 2nd JULY 2009 2 ORAL JUDGMENT [ PER P.V.HARDAS , J ] 1. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties, this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission. 2. By this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner prays for directing the respondents to decide the application of the petitioner at Exh.`B’, addressed to the Tahsildar dated 29.11.2008 in respect of issuance of the appropriate experience certificate. The petitioner further prays for directing the respondent No.5 Tahsildar to issue the appropriate certificate to the petitioner of having worked for three years on the basis of the orders issued by the Tahsildar. The petitioner further prays that by virtue of Government Resolutions dated 19.3.1998, 17.9.2001, 21.2.2004 and 26.8.2005, the petitioner is entitled to be considered for permanent absorption in the Government service and also prays for directing the respondents to pay stipend of Rs.300/- p.m to the petitioner as per the Government Resolutions. 3. In the light of the limited nature of grievance of the petitioner, we deem it appropriate to decide this petition finally at 3 this stage. It appears that the petitioner had submitted an application dated 29.11.2008 requesting the Tahsildar to issue the appropriate experience certificate to the petitioner. The aforesaid application though received by the Tahsildar has not been decided by him. Since the application submitted by the petitioner dated 29.11.2008 is undecided, we direct the Tahsildar to decide the said application in accordance with law and if the Tahsildar comes to the conclusion that the petitioner is entitled to be issued with the aforesaid certificate, the Tahsildar shall forthwith issue the necessary certificate. The petitioner may thereafter produce the certificate before the respondents and the respondents within two weeks of the production of the aforesaid certificates and their scrutiny, effect the necessary changes in respect of the period of experience of the petitioner in the list maintained in the office of Respondents 2 and 4. In respect of the other reliefs which the petitioner has sought for in respect of absorption and payment of stipend, the petitioner may submit an appropriate application/representation to the Government and in the event of such representation/application being submitted by the petitioner, we direct the respondents to decide the same in accordance with law within period of eight weeks from the date of its presentation and communicate the decision thereon to the petitioner. 4 5. Rule is thus made absolute on the terms indicated above with no order as to costs. ( R.K.DESHPANDE ) ( P.V.HARDAS ) JUDGE JUDGE vvr/634.09wp