:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3043 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO.3043 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO.3043 OF 2006 IN IN IN REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.32 OF 2006 PETITION (L) NO.32 OF 2006 PETITION (L) NO.32 OF 2006 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO. 107 OF 2006 NO. 107 OF 2006 NO. 107 OF 2006 IN IN IN INSOLVENCY INSOLVENCY INSOLVENCY PETITION NO.199 OF 2004 PETITION NO.199 OF 2004 PETITION NO.199 OF 2004 Ramavtar Kunjilal Gupta & Anr. ..Petitioners Vs. SICOM Ltd. ..Respondent Mr.Virag Tulzapurkar i/b. Ramesh Sarogi for the Petitioners. Mr.Kishore Jain i/b. P.V.Shah for the Respondent. Mr.Y.C.Parekh, Official Assignee with A.P.Kothari, Dy.Official Assignee. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.VAZIFDAR,JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR,JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 14TH DECEMBER, 2006 : 14TH DECEMBER, 2006 : 14TH DECEMBER, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Notice of Motion, the Petitioners are seeking the condonation of 81 days delay in filing the above Review Petition. Perused the affidavit- in- support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated therein, specially in paragraph No.4, sufficient cause is made out. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Petitioners. Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of the prayer clause (a). (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)