1 S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.2960/2006 Date : 17.07.2006 HON'BLE MR.SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. G.J. Gupta for the applicant. Mr. Vishnu Kachhawaha, Public Prosecutor. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the impugned order. The allegations against the applicant are under Section 406 and 498A IPC and it is alleged that the applicant is making use of Stridhana of Smt. Vimla Devi. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that co-accused Sohan Lal has already been enlarged on bail, therefore, the present applicant may also be enlarged on bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 2 Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the present case and particularly the fact that co-accused Sohan Lal has already been enlarged, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of applicant Rani Devi wife of Sohan Lal by I.O./S.H.O. in FIR No.402/2006 P.S. Suratgarh, she shall be released on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- alongwith two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of Investigating Officer on the following conditions:- (i)That she shall make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii)That she shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and; (iii)That she shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J.