IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8157 of 2007 Brajendra Pratap Singh, son of Late Shyam Raj Singh, resident of Village and Post-Office- Dare Nagar, Police Station- Nauhata, District- Rohtas. .... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar, through the Collector, Rohtas at Sasaram. 2. The Collector, Rohtas at Sasaram. 3. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Dehri, Post-Office and Police Station- Dehri-on- Sone, District- Rohtas. 4. The Circle Officer, Nauhata, Police-Station and Post-Office- Nauhata, District- Rohtas. 5. Sri Kundan Ram, son of Sri Girija Ram, resident of Village and Post-Office- Dara Nagar, Police-Station- Nauhata, District- Rohtas. ... Respondents. ----------- 02- 6.2.2009 Heard Mr. Arun Kumar Singh No.4 for the petitioner, and Mr. Bindeshwar Prasad Singh, assistant counsel to Standing Counsel No.12. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 8.3.2007 (Annexure-1), passed by the learned Collector of the District of Rohtas, in Mutation Revision Case No.115 of 2003 (Kundan Ram Vs. Brajendra Pratap Singh), whereby he has set aside the appellate order and remitted the matter back to the learned D.C.L.R. for a fresh decision after making local inspection. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the power to remand has to be 2 sparingly used. He relies on a judgment of this Court reported in 2004 (4) P.L.J.R. 229= 2004 (3) B.L.J.172 (Pabittar Singh @ Ram Pabittar Singh and another Vs. the State of Bihar and others). 3. It appears to me on a perusal of the materials on record that, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the learned revisional authority felt that a fresh inspection is essential in the interest of justice. In that view of the matter, I would not like to interfere with the impugned order. 4. The writ petition is dismissed. (S K Katriar, J.) S.K.Pathak/