1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1597 OF 2004 APPLICATION NO.1597 OF 2004 APPLICATION NO.1597 OF 2004 IN IN IN SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO.1178 OF 2004 NO.1178 OF 2004 NO.1178 OF 2004 Balkrishna Baburao Tilekar & Ors. ...Applicants Vs. Baburao Sopana Tilekar & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Tejas D. Deshmukh for the Applicants Mr.Vikas Shivarkar for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: FEBRUARY 2,2005. FEBRUARY 2,2005. FEBRUARY 2,2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Counsel appearing for the parties. Service of rule on Respondent No.4 is dispensed with as the learned Counsel for the Applicants /Appellants states that the Respondent No.4 is supporting the Appellants. The learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 states that till the final disposal of the Appeal, Respondent Nos.1 to 3 will not create any third party interest in respect of suit properties. This statement is accepted. In view of this statement, it is not necessary to grant any interim relief. Hence, Ad-interim relief granted earlier stands vacated. Civil Application stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Judge. Judge. Judge.