CRM-M No. 35210 of 2011 **** Pritam v. State of Haryana Present: Mr. Jitender Dhanda, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Man Mohan Sikka, DAG, Haryana. **** This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in case bearing FIR No.169 dated 21.05.2011, under Sections 323, 365, 506, 511, 34 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Barwala, District Hisar. On 22.11.2011 the following contention was noticed:- “Learned counsel has argued that FIR was lodged after seven days and as per Annexure P-1 the petitioner was on duty in Delhi.” At the very outset learned DAG has very fairly stated that the offence under the Arms Act has been deleted. Consequently the two non-bailable offences are Sections 365 and 506 IPC. However, with regard to document Annexure P-1 learned DAG has stated that that is a matter of evidence. At this stage it may not be possible to give a finding of innocence with regard to the petitioner on the basis of that letter but definitely that letter does cast a doubt on the guilt of the petitioner. Resultantly I allow this petition. Let the petitioner appear before the investigating officer on 10.12.2011 between 10.00 a.m. and 4.00 p.m. and on any other date on which his presence is required. The investigating officer, on his appearance, shall release him on bail to his satisfaction, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE November 30, 2011 sunita