^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DB: Hon'bteShri Sunil Kumar Sinha & Hon'ble Shri Radhe Shvam Sharma. JJ. WritADpealNo.299/2011 Appellants/ (Respondent No.1l 1. (Respondent No.2) 2. (Respondent No.3) (Respondent No.4) 3. 4. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary Department of School Education DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG) The Director, Lok Shikshan Sanchatnalaya, Behind Board of Secondary Education, Pension Bada, Raipur (CG) The District Education Officer, Education District Raigarh (CG) The Divisiona! Superintendent of Education, Bilaspur Division, Biiaspur (CG) Respondents (Pefitioner) (Respondent No.5) Shashidhar Panda, S/o. Shri Loknath Panda, Aged about 52 years, Ad-hoc Upper Division Teacher, Govt. H.S. School, Mahapalli Djstrict Raigarh (CG) (Presentiy discontinued) R/o. Viflage Belariya Post Banora District Raigarh (CG) State of Madhya Pradesh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Education Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (MP) Present: Shri A.S. Kachhwaha, Dy. Advocate General with Shri UNS Deo, Govt. Advocate for the State/appeilants. ORAL ORDER (04.07.2011.) The fpllowina order ofthe Gourtwas nassed bv Sunll Kumar Slnha. J. Heard on I.A. No.01/2011, an application for condonation of delay in filing the writ appeal. 2. Accordlng to the office report, the writ appeal is barred by 110 days of iimitation. 3. On due consideration ofthe submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and the grounds taken in the application for condonation of delay, the same is allowed and the delay in filing the writ appeal is hereby condoned. 4. Heard on admission. 5. The appellants/State has filed this appeal against order dated 13th January, 2011 passed inW.P. No.1999/2006. S. By the impugned order, the learned Single Judge has quashed the order dated 26.7.2005 (Annxure-P/14), which was passed on the representation made by the respondents in pursuance of the earlier order passed in W.P. No.1529/2005 and has further observed in para 4 as follows:- " 4. It is expected that the State shall consider the cases of both the petitioners in light of the order dated 2.3.1998 passed by the Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Jablapur, in O.A. No. 888/1997, which according to the petitioners, have attained finality by the direction issued by this Court for non-compliance of the order dated 2.3.1998 to consider the representation and decide in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks, from the date of receipt of copy ofthis order." 7. Shri A.S. !^chhw@ha, Isarned Dy. Advocate General, after arguing for some time, seeks permission towithdraw this appea!. 8. Permission is granted. 8. Accordingly, the writ appeat is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Sd/- R.S. SHARMA. Judge :;inl