IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 7194 of 2009 Date of Decision: 06.10.2010 Balwinder Singh and others .... Petitioners Versus Satpal Singh ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Puneet Jindal, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. D.S. Mann, Advocate for Mr. K.S. Kahlon, Advocate for the respondent ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present petition is filed challenging order dated 29.8.2009 passed by Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.) Amritsar as well as order dated 20.11.2009 passed by Addl. District Judge, Amritsar whereby an application moved by the plaintiffs-petitioners under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 for restraining the defendant not to alienate the property and not to dispossess the plaintiff was dismissed. It is settled principle of law that any alienation made during the pendency of the suit shall be hit by principle of lis pendence irrespective of the fact injunction application was rejected or allowed. There seems to be no justification to interfere in the view taken by both the Courts below. Dismissed. (ALOK SINGH) 06.10.2010 JUDGE reena