1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Second Appeal No.131 of 2009. Dilip S/o Wasudeorao Bukkawar. Vs. Rajesh Kishan Dongre & others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri Tikle Advocate H/F Shri N. D. Khamborkar Advocate for the appellant. Coram : A.H. Joshi, J. Dated : 06th APRIL, 2009. 1. This is an appeal under the provisions of Bombay Public Trust Act, under Section 74(4) thereof. 2. The Change Report submitted by the Respondent under Section 22 of the Act, reporting the change affected in the meeting dated 22-9-2002 was 2 accepted by the Assistant Charity Commissioner by the Judgment dated 24-6-05. 3. The First appeal at the first instance before the Joint Charity Commissioner was preferred by the objector (Present appellant) being appeal No.26/75 which has been dismissed by the Judgment and order dated 28-4-2006. 4. Aggrieved by the Judgment of the Joint Charity Commissioner, the Objector preferred an appeal, which is the appeal at the second instance, before the District Judge, Nagpur, Appeal No. 18/2006, which has been heard and dismissed by the Judgment and Order dated 3/12/2008. 5. Present appeal, by said objector, which is 3 registered as second appeal, which is in fact, third appeal and 4 th trial, is arising out Judgment and order, passed by the District Judge-10, Nagpur in R.C.A. No. 18 of 2006, 6. The questions agitated in this appeal are as to the legality of fact finding done by the Trial Court as confirmed in two earlier appeals. 7. As much as eight questions have been formulated to be the grounds or substantial questions of law. 8. Heard learned Advocate for the appellants and perused the Judgments impugned and respective memo of appeals. The questions and grounds, which are agitated, are pure questions as to appreciation of 4 evidence and debate on fact finding. 9. It is not shown or urged as to how do any substantial questions of law arise. None amongst the questions is a substantial question of law obtaining between the parties. 10. As no substantial questions of law involved. Appeal is dismissed. JUDGE /Muley/