£?^c^L- ^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH ATBILASPUR W.P.No. «£R/2004 tf PETITIONERS ^••y. /' _i7Ji: l^y.-/' .^^^ ^^^""- ^t*. ^- <-^^ &' RESPONDENTS 1. ^ ^t^- '."^ 2. 5 3. 4, ^ 5. ^ 6. 5 Rajendra Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Vishalram Yadav Age 24 years ' R/o Village - Amoda Th. - Navagarh Distt.- Janjgir Champa (C.G.) Ramkirtan S/o Dileshawar Kashyap Age27years R/o Village - Karra ; Post - Hardi hari (S)i Th. - Navagar Distt.- Janjgir Champa (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through—The Secretary Panchayat Gramin Vikas Vibhag D.K.S.BhawanRaipur (C.G.) The Gollector, Janjgir Distt.-Janjgir Champa (C.G.^ The Additional Collector, Janj^ Distt.- Jarygir ChaiBpa (C.G.} The Sub - divisional OfEicer Janjgir Distt.- Janjgir Champa (C.G.) Ttie: Chfef Executiwe Officer ©isfriet ^m E)isl|t.-JanjgirChampa(C.G.) EttuGataon Officer ;: ; jgu-iE)i;Stji..t.!;anjgu-Chemaga;|,|; s''II KS'fi^W \ (.y ^ 7. Grain Panchayat Navapara Through - its Sarpanch [Manharan Lal Gaanda ] R/o Village - Kewa Post - Ainoda Th.Ss Distt. - Janjgir Champa (C.G.) 8. Govindram Rathore Secretaiy, ~ Gram Panchayat Navapara, Th. Navagarh, Distt, - Janjgir Champa (C.G.) 9. Ghasirain Gaanda S/o Bulakiram ^ Gaanda Aged Bout 32 years (Selection CpninuttedMeniber's) R/o Bhaisda, Post-Amoda Th.Ss Distt. - JanjgiF Champa (C.G.) ws^^sESSXWKSVnimER As'ncLB OF ?HIE :c©N§a!amH[i@B@iiaiNBiA. Kt:.^S^ 'ullv that the submit as under: m HKSH COUICT OF CaUHJCTnSGJUtH AT BltAffiUR WRIT PEnnOKHO.1668/04 Rajendra Kutaar Yadav & ano. Vs. State of Chhattlagiirh a> otliera. ORDBR Post for: 7/2/2005 Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge m^ii HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSOARH AT BIUMBPXni WMT PBTTnon I10.l6<>8/04 Rajendra Knniar Yadav & ano. Vs. Statc of CMi«ittiagn»I»B»oth«a». Slui P.K. Patel, cpunael fo»the petttione»«- Sbzl U.N.8. Deo, QA., for respondents no.1,2,3,41* 6. Bone for other reapondcaito*. Shri Azad Siddlque for the intCTVwier. ORDBR The petitioners havc fifed tfac present petition uhaUcugmg tlic uidca's datal 23/2/2004 (Aiuuyture-P/1) passcd by (hc Sub Divisional Officcr, Jaajgir and datcd 17/5/2004 (Anncxurc-P/2) passcd by thc Addl. Collcctor, Janjpr. 2. Briefty stated feicts of fhe case are fhat the petitionera were appoiuted as Coatract Teacher, Class III vide oxder dated 28/8/2003 and they were worldng on tfae sajd posts. It is stated fhat fhe iatenrenjer marie a coiuplaiat against fbe appointmeTits complaining fhe trregiilarities. It is fiirther stated fhat fhe complaint has been decidcd by llic Sub Divisioiial Of&cer wle hte order dated 23/2/2004 fhat fhe pctitioncrs have aot beeu propcrly appomted aud piirsuant to fhat, fhe selcction was cancelted. It is also stated that against thc said order, a petltion was prcferred l>y the petitloners atongwlth an appUcatlon for atay before ftic Addl. CoUculor. 3. Lcarncd counscl for thc pctitioucis coatendcd that wh.cn thc niattcr camc up for hcaring on stay, tbc Addl, CoUector on 8/3/2004 did not pass any order on tfae ground fhat tfae election has been dectared and as tfae clectfon piixxiss is luug, possibUity of appoiutmcul is uol llicre. The rclcvant portion of thc said oxdcr is quotcd bdow: "........ ^^" Ji?7y >%^7 fiW y^f VRR ;^cfr ^^7 f^jr ^PJI ^ 1 yw: ^fi^ 'tiiifid cj^ ^ Fl^f^i <?W ^ t / Sff' ^ W77 ^ W<!lW*d/ ?W wsw ^' 7 gN' ^ v r w^r ^ -3fl^W Tf f^WR f^ u^ VT r^f/......" Thc inattcr fhCTcaftcr caiac up fin- hcaring wa. 17/5/2004 and it was disxnisscd on ttic ground fhat thc pctitmn is not inaintauiable, •1. It is stated that fhere are Rules fisained, aainefy, Madhya Pradesh Paachayats (Appeal and Revision) Rufcs, 1995. Under Rule 3 ofthe Rules, the provision ofappealand appeUate aufhorily is theie and under Rule 5 of fhe Rules, thcn" is a pinvision of revision. Rnte 3 and Riile 5 of the Rides are rek-vant and are quoted below: *3. AptNMtI tuul aaBeUate autlWrtitea.- Save where ii has been (fthenifise prmrided vn the Ad or nites or.bye-laws made thereimder, an appecd shall lie,- (a) in the oase of an passed by ihe Sub- DivisimtCtl Offioer under any praviswn of Ihe Act or rutes or byekvws made (hereunder-to ihe Cotlector. (b) in the case of an order passed by fhe Collectw under any pnwiswn of fflie Ad w rufes ur bye Saws made thereunder-to the Canumssianer. (<j in ttie case of em. order passect by the Conumssioner or Direclor o/flanchayris-to (he Sfazfe Goi/ermnent Cc^ fn the wese of un unter pusssed by the Pmufiayat sptMtfvfd in Cohmm. ft) of ihe Tahle belowto the caifhority spedfied in the cxirresponlSng enhy in ooharm. (2) thereto. 5. Itertston.- (1^0) The Slate Clovermnent, ffie Coimmssioner, ihe Director of Pcavduiycct, ihe Co/tector may on its/his own mation or on the application by ccny party, cct any time for the purpose ofscilisjying itself/tmnselfas to fhe legafity <w pnyfrieiy of any order passed by or as to ihe regulccrity of fhe proceeding of, the auttwrity subardinale to it/kcm. oall far ccnd, exanwze ihe record of ccny oase pending before, or disposed of by, such authority and Irwy pasa suctt order in referwwe Iheretu us it/.tus nwy thinkfit: Provided fhat ii/he shall not vary or reuerse ctny order unless notice has been serued on the pcaties interested and opporb.trdty given to ihem, for being heccrd. Provided further fhcct no applioation for revision shalt be enterteuned dgcanBt an order afyiealctble undertheA^. P>) An appUcatton for revision tfy any parfy sha.ll only be enterteaned if ii is on the point of law ccnd not onfeuas. (2) yutunthstiavSruf iiriything conhiined in iiittrrute (n- fi) Where procee&ngs in resped of any case hcwe been conwwnced by fhe State Gtwemmeiwt under sub-rule (1) rw acffon shdll be taken by ottwr Qffwer mentioned fn the said sub-rute in reapect thereof, and fti) Where prooeectings in respect of any. sucft aase hecue been oonunenoed by the Officer mentioned in sub-rule (I), the State Govermnent may either refrcdn. frmn. taking caiy acKoin ttnder Ous rule in respect qfsKCfa oase until thefitat disposa] qfsucft proceecSng by such officer or nwy wilhctrcatt sudt prooeecUng cmdpass swhwder as 1t may deemfit.' s^^^^^i^^^^^^^^^^ss^i^^^s^s^ss^^^s^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ t^ '7 I- 'T III:! II It is coritended that undcr ffae Adhmtyam, pnc appcal or Eevisionlies. 5. So fiu- as thie niaU^ regwdiug heani^ uu stay is coaccnicd, fhc xnattcr should havc beca faeard atld order sfaouU bc passcd. TU.C Coiutbcloiw' dcclincd toptfflsanoMlcr mere^r oa Ifae grouxMt tiiat tihe etectioa ptoctes Ii^i started, whic&Kloes not appearto be jusfc It &iled to exenase e juristlictfoa. 'Rus part<rf1lt& oadcr ia aot s^ 6. So fiu-asfheotfaCT'questi(toieg^mln»gdisiB^sat^^^ appeal as not Tnnintsnninhle is conceraed, it is alm not jiistified. The mat^isln be heanl and the oignrhni^ teto be providcd to fhfi parties. 7. Accoldu^fy, the petition is aBowed. T3 UBFt^ual orders dated 23/2/3004 (Aanexuie-P/1) aod 17/5/2004 (AnDfixuic-P/2) are set aside, The niatter te rraiutteil tojack to fhc eourtbelow fiwitejliearinga&esh. 8. Tfac pM-ties pi^ for^fi^^ befiuB'lIic CoUTll>e^»*. ftcconlu^ly,^^ giveu as fhc fixcd date fbrihcjapjpcarancc ctffbc^^I^^ TTac fliattef wiU bt: dccMxal as caily ^ possfl^ •within six Wt?clss firom. thatdate. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge -7^2/2@oi!