IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19314 of 2008 RAM BALLAM MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.09.2008 This application is for restoration of Cr.Revn.No. 133 of 2000 which was dismissed on 6thFebruary 2007 on account of non- prosecution, as noboidy had appeared on repeated calls. This application has been filed on 14th May 2008 i.e. after a period of one year and three months of dismissal. The only ground taken in the restoration application is that the counsel for the petitioner had not marked the case on the day of dismissal; hence, he could not appear. Be that as it may, there has been inordinate delay in filing of the restoration application and any satisfactory explanation is not being furnished. Under the circumstances, I do not feel satisfied about the grounds taken for restoration. Hence, this application is rejected. Jay/ (C.M.Prasad,J)