IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR THURSDAY, THE 12TH JULY 2007 / 21ST ASHADHA 1929 RP.No. 1048 of 2006(H) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.4488/2001 Dated 07/08/2006. .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER --------------------------------------------- M.M.ROSE, FOOD INSPECTOR, (ON DEPUTATION), THIRUVALLA CIRCLE. BY ADV. SRI.K.S.SAJEEV KUMAR SRI.P.M.JOSEPH RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS ------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE HEALTH SECRETARY, (DIRECTOR HEATLH SERVICES), THE DIRECTORATE OF HEALTH SERVICES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT. EXAMINATIONS, DEPT. OF GENERAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.NOBLE MATHEW THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: J.B.KOSHY & M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JJ. ------------------------------------- R.P.No.1048 OF 2006 in O.P.No.4488 of 2001 and C.M.Appl.No.1816 of 2006 ------------------------------------- Dated 12th July, 2007 ORDER Koshy,J . This is a petition to review the judgment dated 7th August, 2006. The judgment was pronounced in the open court in the presence of advocates on both sides. A review petition cannot be equated to a petition for rehearing of the matter or appeal proceedings. There is no ground for review. Apart from the above, we see no ground in the delay condonation petition also. Hence both delay condonation petition and review petition are dismissed. J.B.KOSHY JUDGE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE tks