CRM-M No. 28013 of 2011 **** Parambir Singh v. State of Punjab Present: Mr. J.V.Yadav, Advocate with Mr.S.K.Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Man Mohan Sikka, DAG, Haryana. Mr. N.S.Shekhawat, Advocate for the complainant. **** This is a petition for regular bail filed in case bearing FIR No. 97 dated 14.04.2011, under Sections 363, 366, 120-B and 506 IPC registered at Police Station Kanina, District Mahendergarh. Learned counsel have argued that it is not disputed that the prosecutrix is a major and the story that she was forcibly abducted does not ring true because she was with the petitioner for more than 24 hours and even in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. she has herself stated that the petitioner Parambir Singh wanted to marry her. Apart from that learned counsel state that there are no allegations that any attempt was made to outrage her modesty. The petitioner has now been in custody since 14.04.2011. Learned counsel for the complainant and learned DAG, on instructions from HC Sunil Kumar, have accepted the factual assertions but have denied the argument that the allegation does not ring true. Keeping in mind the complete factual matrix and the period of custody already undergone by the petitioner and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to grant bail tot he present petitioner. Hence, this petition is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Narnaul. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE November 11, 2011 sunita