IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 24TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 17984 of 2009(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- A.T.KARUNAN, KALATHINGAL MEETHAL HOUSE, MUCHUKUNNU P.O., KOYILANDY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SAJU J.VALLYARA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, VADAKARA. SR.GOVT. PLEADER K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P(C).No.17984 of 2009 ================== Dated this the 24th day of November, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a stage carriage operator having a regular permit on the route Purakkad-Cheruvannur. He applied for revision of his timings, by Ext.P1. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that Ext.P1 has not been considered, although the same was filed as early as on 6.5.2009. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. 3. On a perusal of Ext.P1, I do not find any change of circumstances mentioned therein warranting revision of timings of the petitioner's service. The circumstances mentioned therein were all circumstances, which were obtaining at the time of earlier settlement of timings itself. As such, if the petitioner was aggrieved by the timings earlier fixed, his remedy was to file a revision before the State Transport Appellate Tribunal. Admittedly the petitioner has not chosen to do so. Therefore, the petitioner has not made out a case for revision of his timings. That being so, I do not think that I can direct the respondent to consider Ext.P1. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2