N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPU I R ETITIONER :-/ B.L. Ganware, aged about 40 years son of law Shri Jhadu Ram Ganware, Assistant Grade—II, Tahsil Office Dondilohara, District Durg [C.G.]. VERSUS RESPONDENTS :~ 1] State of Chhattisgarh, Through- The Secretary Law Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur [C.G.]. ,I 2] Shanti Lal son of Premraj Jain, aged I w I: , QPY about . 35 years . a resident of Andi, . Rncwfq u ‘ ; Police Statron and Tahsrl Dondilohara, District Durg [C.G.]. CLERK-to A j 3] The Collector, Durg [C.G.]I G L ASPUR WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA P ’ J Xl-HC-78 ”W Eqi$WJ°£VTQ .2...é.;?.5:./.2 ‘ "wé mzoo r 33WW5 (1am) méumm mmam V ‘mmmamaa mma‘wm $a§nm§q 24.5.2006 W.P.No.~2635[2006 Shn' N.K. Chatteljae, cm Shri V.V. S.Mu1“t.hy, Dy. advance cgpy, Hcard on admission. This patition has baen f1 Vida para 12 of the order de Revision No. 256/ 2005 by tha Disilict—Durg(CG). ‘ It appear revision, ths Sessions Judge herein, who was working as a Reader to the Executive M gistmte, Dondilohara, had issued summons to respondent No. 2 on 3.3.2005 and also directe that he should remain pres This date was also given Sessions Judge noticed that" Residing Onicer and such petitioner] concerned Reader made vidc para 12 of t :"IQE’FI' WW: $ w 3m we? $0 — 9 ‘8‘ WW 3/3/05, 35f W W? W 1ed for expunction of remark made Lted 4.4.2006,‘ passed in Criminal Additional Sessions Judge, » Balod, s that While hearing the criminal on'ced that even without any order in this regard, the petition ‘WwwWwwW9/3/o5fW . ‘ unsel for the petitioner. }Adv0cate General for the State on d t along‘with surety on 9.3.2005. him on his own motion. The no snob older was passed by the kind of action was taken by the of the said Court. Theobservan'ons he impugned order are as follows arwwwwem #wdwawaww A W%w ’ mam m2oo mermmdfaw)