IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9 of 2010 ***** Shyam Bihari Singh, son of Late Yamuna Prasad, resident of village- Hasanpur, P.O.-Nahub, P.S.- Rajgir, District-Nalanda. …. …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif. 2. The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Rajgir, Nalanda. 3. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Rajgir, Nalanda. …. …. Respondents ----------- 2. 5.1.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the Bank and learned counsel for the State. The submission of the counsel is that the objections raised by the petitioner before the Certificate Officer has not been decided and coercive measures are being taken against him. The Court gave ample opportunity to the petitioner to formulate and make a submission as to the objections which he wants the Certificate Officer to decide, he has nothing to offer except certain reasons which came in the way of non- payment of the loan, which is not denied by the petitioner. The other objection that the requisition did not have the date therefore goes to the root of the matter with regard to jurisdiction, is unsustainable. The writ application has no merit. It is only a way of wriggling out of the liability of repayment of a loan which has been granted to the petitioner years ago and is not denied. The writ application has no merit. It is dismissed. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)