IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 26th day of August, 2009 Bail Application No. 772 of 2009 Criminal Side Satish S/o Shri Kishan, R/o Village Kurdi Bhagwanpur, Police Station Kotwali Laksar District Haridwar …….Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ..…..Opposite Party. Arising out of Case Crime No. 100 of 2009 , Under Section: 302 / 34 of I.P.C., P.S.: Kotwali Laksar, District: Haridwar. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard Mr. Rajendra Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. B.S. Parihar, learned Brief Holder for the State, and Mr. Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for the complainant. Applicant – Satish, who is in jail in connection with Case Crime No. 100 of 2009, relating to offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali Laksar, District Haridwar, has sought his release on bail. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that there are four persons named in the First Information Report. The applicant is not named in the First Information Report. Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that it is a case of circumstantial evidence. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail. Let the applicant- Satish be released on bail on executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt.26.08.2009 NS