THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA C.R.P. No. 5290 of 2009 Oral order: This C.R.P. is directed against the order dated 28.08.2009, passed by the IV Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy, allowing the application in I.A. No. 284 of 2008 in O.S. No. 1451 of 2005, filed by the respondent-plaintiff praying to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to note down the physical features by de- marking the schedule property and to file a report to Court in which survey number the suit schedule property falls. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner-defendant and perused the order under revision. I am unable to agree with the contention of the petitioner- defendant that the order passed by the Court below appointing an Advocate Commissioner to note down amounted to permitting the Advocate Commissioner to collect evidence on behalf of the respondent-plaintiff. As can be seen from the order under revision, there appears to be disputes as regards the boundaries of the property and as to in which survey number the property falls, and to ascertain that fact so as to resolve the dispute, the Court below appointed Advocate Commissioner, to measure the properties of both the parties with the help of Mandal Surveyor, and such order, cannot be said to be an order permitting the Advocate Commissioner, to collect evidence on behalf of the respondent-plaintiff. Hence, I find no reason whatsoever to interfere with the order under revision in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. There is no merit in the C.R.P., and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: December, 2009. KSR