IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 14013 of 2007 Date of Decision: 16.12.2008 Deepak Nanda ..Petitioner versus Kurukshetra Development Board and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.THAKUR,CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present : Mr. Sunil Magan, Advocate with Ms. Meenu Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. S.C.Sibal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. V.S.Rana, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. I.S.Sidhu, Advocate for respondent No.2 Mr. Rameshwar Malik, Addl. A.G. Haryana for respondents No. 3 and 5 Mr. Varun Gupta, Advocate for respondent No. 4 ***** T.S.Thakur, C.J. (Oral) After arguing the matter at considerable length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was ready to make a comprehensive representation to the State Government pointing out all the CWP No. 14013 of 2007 [2] irregularities, deficiencies and other acts of neglect committed by the Board and its functionaries and make his suggestions for better management of the affairs of the Board and better utilisation of the funds which the government provides for a place of pilgrimage being managed by the former. He urged that the government could be directed to look into the representation carefully and take remedial steps in the matter, wherever the same are found necessary and feasible. Mr. Sibal, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Kurukshetra Development Board and Mr. Malik, appearing for the respondent-State of Haryana have no objection to that course of action being followed. They submit that if the representation is made by the petitioner, the government can consider the same and take appropriate steps wherever the same are necessary or feasible under intimation to the petitioner. In the circumstances, therefore, we permit the petitioner to withdraw this petition with liberty to him to file a detailed representation articulating the grievances that he has regarding the work of the Board as also regarding the irregularities allegedly committed in the course of discharge of its duties and suggestions for the improvement of the management of the Board and its affairs, if any. On the receipt of the representation, which shall be addressed to the Secretary, Government of Haryana, Urban Development Department, the same shall be examined if necessary, by holding an enquiry into the issues raised and appropriate remedial steps taken to ensure that there is no irregularity in the management of the Board affairs or in the management of the funds allocated by the Government. The needful shall be done by the government CWP No. 14013 of 2007 [3] within six months from the date the representation is received under intimation to the petitioner who shall than have the liberty to seek further redress in appropriate proceedings, if the need so arises, in accordance with law. All the pending applications are also disposed of accordingly. Copy of the order be given dasti to all the counsel for the parties under the signature of the Bench Secretary. (T.S.THAKUR) CHIEF JUSTICE (JASBIR SINGH) JUDGE 16.12.2008 'ravinder'