IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11472 of 2010 GANNU YADAV, Son of Banarashi Yadav, R/o Kanhaipur, P.S. Mokama, District Patna ….. Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR …. Opposite Party ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. S.D.Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Rita Verma, A.P.P. 2 29.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 323, 447, 341, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act . It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that allegation of assault is general and omnibus against all the co-accused persons. Allegation of firing is upon co- accused Shyam Sundar Yadav and Nageshwar Yadav, however, there is no fire arm injury. So far the injury is concerned, it is submitted that some of them are of course grievous in nature but there is nothing to show that such injury was inflicted upon the informant specifically by this petitioner. It is also submitted that there is land dispute between the parties. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, - 2 - the petitioner, GANNU YADAV, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh in connection with Mokama P.S. Case No. 235 of 2009, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be a close relative or family member of the petitioner, who shall file affidavit before the concerned court giving complete genealogy to show his or her relationship with the petitioner. Further, the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of trial. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation then the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)