LLEI ^(;^^r IN THE HIGHCOURTOF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR FIRST APPEAL UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE F.A. NoJ^ /2009 '-siijiiyss Oii.;:^., APPELLANT PLAINTIFF ...^g^ yw^s^- ©ateo.--- RESPONDENTS :1) DEFENDANTS :2) :3) :4) :5) Gendlal Dewangan, Son of late Budu Dewangan, aged about 61 years, R/o. Village Markamtola, Tahsil Lgarh, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS Rupendra Sahu, son of Sewakrain Sahu, aged 20 years, R/o. Village Khaprikala, Tahsil and District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Gyanendra, son of Sewakram Sahu, aged 16 years, Minor Manendra son of Sewakram Sahu, aged 14 years, Minor, Respondents 2 and 3 minors through guardian and inother Ashwantin Bai, wife of Sewakram Sahu, aged 36 years, R/o. Village Khaprikala, Tahsil and District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Naresh, son of Bhawanlal Vaid, aged 45 years, R/o. Sadarline, Ward No.35, City Rajnandgaon, Tahsil and District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Acting through Collector, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon FIRST APPEAL UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE N' s f 'WHC—Jt •^-Sf ^a.WMii, ^w,^ f3RTR?y _^. ^0,,/^JO^I 3II^TTI5R7 (' R5<) EE^'S^W •iisTwtwanw! TOTIW^feiSiT^T "TORT*T StRff ^- feet WiwTt ^ stRft? srf^T ;,p S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Aaarwaf Noneforthe appellant. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel L^wyer for the State. The matter is called for h^aring twice. On both occasions, none appears, nor any repres^itation is made on behalf of the appellant. The appellant may n matter. prosecution. t>t be interested in prosecuting the n view of the above, thri appeal is dismissed for want of Sd/- N.K.Agarwal Judge