IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR C.A.O. NO.710 OF 2010 IN M.C.A.ST NO. 9943 OF 2010 IN S.A. NO.95 OF 1996. (DEVILAL SHANKARJI PRABHAWANT..VS.. SHANKAR JANARDHAN TIPLE.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr.Rohit Joshi, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. H.P. Lingayat, Advocate for Respondent. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 30, 2010. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The learned counsel for the respondent strongly opposes the prayer made in the civil application and state that the delay in filing the application for restoration is inordinate and should not be condoned. However, for the reasons recorded in paragraphs No. 2 to 5 of the civil application and also because the client should not suffer due to an inadvertent mistake by his counsel, the delay in filing the restoration application is condoned. The Civil Application is allowed and disposed of. MCA ST.NO. 9943/2010. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Perused the contents of the civil application. For the reasons stated in the civil application, the prayer made in the civil application is granted and the second appeal is restored to file subject to the payment of costs of Rs.three hundred in the High Court Bar Library within a period of ten days. The Misc. Civil Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and disposed of. The private paper book should be positively filed within a period of ten days. JUDGE RR.