IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20122 of 2010 SONU KUMAR MAHTON, S/o Tuntun Mahto. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 11.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code and subsequently Sections 120B and 411 of the Indian Penal Code was added. Considering that the petitioner’s complicity was disclosed by the co-accused persons one of whom was also identified in the Test Identification Parade by the informant, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, he may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is made clear that the petitioner’s case shall not be bifurcated for the purpose of this order. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)