FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.2394 OF 2007 -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Mr.S.A.Sawant for the petitioners. Mr.J.Shekhar for respondent no.1. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED: 26TH FEBRUARY, 2008 DATED: 26TH FEBRUARY, 2008 DATED: 26TH FEBRUARY, 2008 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This writ petition challenges the orders passed by the courts below by which the application at Exhibit-5 in regular civil suit no.42 of 2005 filed by the respondent-plaintiffs came to be allowed. The trial Court allowed the application vide order dated 1st September, 2005, which the appellate court confirmed vide order dated 6th November, 2006. Admittedly, the temporary injunction granted by the trial Court on 1st September, 2005 is operating till today. Keeping that in view and considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case this writ petition is disposed of by the following order: . The trial Court shall endeavour to dispose of the suit bearing regular civil suit No.42 of 2005 as expeditiously as possible and preferrably within a period of one year from the date of receipt of this order on merits in accordance with law and uninfluenced by the observations made in the impugned orders. All contentions of the parties on merits are kept open. . At this stage Mr.Sawant, learned counsel for the petitioners states that some proceedings are pending before the revenue authorities between the parties in these proceedings and the revenue authorities may also be directed to decide those proceedings expeditiously in accordance with law. It is not proper to issue such directions since the revenue authorities are expected to decide the proceedings on merits in accordance with law. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)