b IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (c.G.) WRIT PETITION (227) No. 6W4; OF 2009 (3.3.) PETITIONER / Ajay Hotwani S/o V. G. Hotwani, \ DEFENDANT No.2 aged about 29 years, C/o Dinesh Hotwani, Hanuman Grih Nirman Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.). VERSUS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA y RESPONDENTS : /1. Ashutosh Tripathi S/o Shri S. N. PLAINTIFF Tripathi, Permanent Address : 83 Ashish Nagar, Indore (M.P.). Presently residing at : E—8, Arera Colony, Bhopal (M.P.), through: Power of Attorney, S. N. Tripathi S/o Late Shri R. R. Tripathi, R/o 83 Ashish‘Nagar; Indore (M.P.). DEFENDANT NO. 1 / 2. Hanuman Grih, Nirman Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, Hanuman Nagar, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.). DEFENDANT No.3 /3. Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Telibandha, Old R.T.O. Office, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.). i , . W ‘P CtLW)‘ Na‘ 68’L/égzoo? m‘m (W‘U i1 $3. Hon’bie gem Justice Am. A arwag 23-1 $29639» V? V A Shn MK Bhaduri, counsd €ar the peiitioner. Head on admissmn. 'Feeiing aggrieved by the order dated 144 (3-2009 passed Tenth Addé‘tienaf Dist?§ct Judge! Raipur in CM Suit No.32~Ai2008 wherefbg} I and whereunder the ap’ Iication for :aking power o§ afterney which has been executed by th pe?§t§onei' 3r: favour of one Dinesh Hotwani on record, eas been re} eéed, the instant peéition has been fEied. Leamee ceunsei appeam for the petitioner submits that the peéiéioeer himseh‘ flied the sai power of attorney in éhe Court authorizing me Dénee'n Homiam‘ n hie beheK therefore the leamec? tea; Coo}? has erfed in dismissm ihe eppiieaiion on the ground Thai iheé‘e Es dz‘fference in the signetur . i-iev'irag heard ieameci coinsei for the peiirioner and haw-ring § eerused the impugeed order: in the considered opinioe ef this Court E he ieerned triai Cour? oughr éo heive aiiowed the petirioner to fire the g saici power of attorney since whofsigned the power of attorney, has g fiieci the document n the Court. Y g ih view of above, the peritien is eiiowed and the triai Court ie directed 1 directed to take the dooement arse thereafter proceed with the case in accordance with law. it is; further made ciear that if the i responciehts are aggrieved, their they may fiie ah apprepriete i eeeiioatien. i v t 7, ., _ II/Zii&?X-—H>‘WO0> KW 'iu§ge ‘