1 wp-2362-11.sxw dgm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2362 OF 2011 Mahadu Laxman Bhondve .... Petitioner vs The State of Maharashtra & ors. .... Respondents Mr. Priten Killedar for the petitioner. Mr. V.S. Gokhale, AGP for respondents 1 to 4. Mr. K. R. Thorat for respondent no.5. CORAM: D. K. DESHMUKH & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : October 13, 2011 P.C.: Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally. 2 The Petitioner challenges the order dated 16.09.2010 passed by the Divisional Commissioner Pune. That order is passed on an application filed under Section 258 of the Land Revenue Code for review of order dated 19 March 2009 passed by the Sub Divisional 2 wp-2362-11.sxw Officer, Haveli By that order, the Divisional Commissioner has directed review of the order. The short submission of the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner is that if the order was passed by the Sub Divisional Officer of which review was sought, application for review could not have been entertained under Section 258 by the Divisional Commissioner. If at all there is power to review, it will be with the Authority which passed the order. 3 We have heard the learned counsel appearing for Respondent no.5. He is not able to support the order which is passed on his application by the Divisional Commissioner. It is plain and clear that the order is without authority of law. The order dated 16.09.2010 passed by the Divisional Commissioner is therefore set aside. The Petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (D. K. DESHMUKH,J.)