^ [GH C'O'URT OF CHHATTISGAW-1 A'i Smt. Ram Kumari Patel, wite ofJeevaa Ran' Patel, aged about 27 years, workmg as - Rojgar Saiiayak— village Fanchayat - Kandoia & Sukhapali, residect •&':e s Baramkela, Tah. Saangarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) (S!,No,24 AmiA-2) :er Tiwai ksla, 3. 2 villaae Panchavat - Bs resident of viUage Baraiiii Tah. Sarangarh, Distt. Aim A-2) Kiimari Savitn Sahu, aged aboirt 26 years, daughter of Chiatanand Saliu, workaig as - Rojgar Salayal Gram Panchayat - Kaadurpali and Amurra, resident ofvillage Aiiiurra, Post Barpali, Bloek Baratnkela, Tah.. Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh (C..G.) (SI.No. 25 AnnA-2) - -I ^i •i ••^l-i'i'u.y- ,-1.,-i- 'Q1-i.^< U ;a t-lt ^"^1k .-«1lU t aauiaiter 0.1 sim naai Kliargai'i, resideut of village Kliai'gi Baran-ikeia, Tah. Sarangarfa, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) (SLNo.lOAiuiA-2) Ku. Sunita Pradhan, aged about 21 years, daughter of Sfari Tirth Lal Pradhan, workiag as - Rojgar Sahayak, gram Panchayat - Nandigaon atid Lipti, residerit of villago Natidtgaoti, Block. BacatiiliiclE!, Tah. Saran^rh, Distt. RaigaA (C.G.) (St.No. 35 Atmexure P-2) Ku. .Anwadha Das, dau^iter of Shri Shram Das, aged about 25 yeare, working ss Rojgar Safiayak Gram Panchayat Sariya and Kanchanpur, Block Baramkela, Tali. Saraiigarh, Distt. Raigarii :(£.G.) (Si.ao. 40 Annexure P-2) 7. i Raiii Patel, as ot' viUage Saada, Block Baranafcela, Tal). Saratigwiii, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) (Sl.no. 39 Aimex P-2) Suraj Kumar Patel, aged about 22 yeara, son ofShri Rqjgar QiiQSi^ysa ~~ n^Ksip^ii residait ofvillage Kai iaramkeSa, Tah. Sarangarfa, Distt. RaigaA (C.G.J \^/ \ (Sl.No. 2 Ann P-2A) 9. Chandrasekhar Chauhan, aged about 28 years, son of Shri Bo<fii Ram Chaufaaii, worluiig as Rojgar Kl'iorigaon, r/o vill. Kaitirid, Post Resora, Baiaiiikela, Tah. Sarangarh, Distt. Rais (SL.N0.23AiBiP-2) 10. Damodar Pradhan, aged about 23 years. son of Shri Sahdeo Pradfaan, working as Rojgar Sahayak Gram Panchayat - Donaripali and Jhikipali R/Q VilS. Lendharjori,, Block Bai-anikela, Post Doneripali, Tah. Saraagarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.O.) (SL.N0.15AimP-2) aged about 24 years, son of Shri Saliu, worfcing as Rojgsi' SttfaayA - Bimi{M}i and I>imarpali, R/o. VUi. Kfaairat, Post Biraipali, Block Baraaikela, Tali. Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh rC..G.')(iSL. N0.7 AnnP- "f? S smgta, aget iliri Hemsagar Siiigh, woridng as Rojgar Saliayafc - Gram Panchayat - Borida and Sankara, R/o. Vill. Sankai-a, Post Satikara, Block Bauuiikela,; Tali. Sarangarh, Distt- Raigarh (C.G.) (SL. N0.12 P-2) 13.Mahesh Ram Chauhan, aged about 21 years, son of SSiri Panaanatid Cliauliati, working as Rojgar Sahayak - Oram Pancfaayat - Bengchi aad Budeii. R/o. Vill. Bsngchi, Post Bengchi, BioekBafatukela, Tah. Saraagarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) (Sl.No. 4 Ana P-2) (SL. N0. 4 Aim P-2) 14.Pyarilal Ratre; aged about 36 years, son of Shri as Rojgar Sahayal;: -Graj) Barauikela, Tah. Sarangarfa, Distt. RaigaA (G.G.) (SL.N0.17AimP-2) 15.Phinilal Chauhan, aged about 20 years, son af Shri working as Rojgar Saliayak- Saraipali, R/o. Vill. 1?an-. f' Kumliari Post Hirri, Biock Bat-aiakela, Tali. Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh rC.G.y(SL.No.29AanP- 2) 16-Gumdeo Barifaa, aged about 23 years, saxi of Shri Saheb Ram Bai'iha, workuig as Rojgi Gram Panchayat- Ghoghara and Dulopaii,:Kyo Vi.il. BelirabaliaL Post Binupali, Block Baraiiakela, TML iarangarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) (SL. No. 16 Ann P- "^ 'VSSs^ 5i .~""'i^l 1 e. '^ ^ Chauhan, aged aboiit 21 vears, dau^iter of Slm Mikiiei Chaul-iaii, workiiig as Rojgar Sahayak - Gram Pancfaayat - Jhaai & Jeerapali Wo. Vill. LimpaSi, Post Jliaal, BIock Baramkela, Tah. Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) (SL.N0.18AimP-2) 8. Veena Sidar, ased about 24 years, gon of Suldiiram Panchayat - Linjir and Katangpali (B) resident of village - Ba^ianpur, Post Katangpali (B), Block (SL.N0.18AimP-2) 19.Ranjeet Singh, age 30 years, son of Shri Raspal Sin^i, 'wot'king as .-1^^».^.1.. ;a, r/o. vill. Dhauradaraha, Post Damdarua, Block Banmkela, Tah. Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) (SL. N0. 4() Ann 'P-"' "A 28 years, •wiSe of Slni Laxtnaii Choudliary, wol-idng as RQJgar Sahavak - Gram Panchavat — < Bimipali, Block Baramkela. Tah. Saraagarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) (SL. N0. 19 Aiia P-2) Ramgopal, aged about 31 years, soa of Shri idhar Patel, working as Rojgar Saliayak Gram Panchayat - Mamkpur and Bargion, R/o. vtll. And Post Maiiikpur, Block Baranikela,, Tali. Sarangarh, Distt Raigarh (C.G.) (SL. No. 22 Ana P- 22.Khiteshwar Chauhan, aged about 35 years, son of iS' - Gram Panchayat - Ranidih and Porath, R/o. viil. Sursih, Post Naiidigaoii, Bloek Bai-aiAda, Tah. Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) (SL. No. 37 AnaB- 23.Govsrdhan Chauhan- aged about 26 years, son of Sfari Gufudeo Chauliati, workuig as Rojg^i- Saliayak Gram Panchayat - Lukapara and Bhatfaa}i, resideut of village aiid Post Lukapara, Bloek Baramkela, Tah. Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) (SL. No. 33 Ann .P-2) VERSUS Departiiieut ofPaiichayat aiid Rurai Developmeat, ^«see'31s%, ^ f' Ssea,- 1, !SwsSS:~^ lst: ';' ':'^f^^ ^' H, ."c"!sa s ilym Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 'fhe Conamissioner, Chhattisgarh Employtnent Guaraiitee Council, Vikas Av-ukt Karyalaya, V&ias Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipur (C.G.) Union of India, Ihrouah the Secretary, Ministry of Rural Devdopment, New DeUii. The District Progratnme Co-ordinator (Collector) Under the Natioaal Rural Eniployment Guafantee Act, 2005, Raigark Disitt^-Raigarh (C.G.) Jila Panchayat - Raigarh, through ifs Chief Exeeutive OfBcer, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) stt. Raii Exeoutive Ofiicsr, (C.G.) WRIT_PElTnON_UNDERARTfCLE_226pP THE CONSlTrUTION OF INDIA 5B; IIon'Ifle SIu'iSatfahK, A.®nhotei,J. Present: Shri Roop Naik- Advocate forfhe petitioners. Ste U.N.S.Deo, Govenainent Advooate for the State/resiwndent No. l, 2 Shri Maneesh Sharma. Advocate for the Union oflndia/respondari. No. 3 (Passed oa 17'°day of Januar^', 2008) dated 09.10.2006 and 16.10.2006 (Annexure P-2 and P-2A), fhe petitionere were appointed as Gram Rojgar Safaayaks on a contTact bwis for a period of one year on fixed pay of Rs. 2000/-. The petitioners apprehend tfaat pursuant to fhe subsequeat advertisement, their services mav be cancelled without completins a period ofone vear. 2. There is no basis for this apprehension, even ofhenvise- a writ cannot be issued onthe @-ound ofanticipated appreheosion. The petition is devoid ofmerit. Thus. the same is dismissed summarilv. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit