gst 1 wp9104.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO. 9104 OF 2010. Sidraya Bhimanna Koli.... .... .... Petitioner. V/s Mallikarjun @ Malkappa Dhanappa Jeur... ... Respondent. Mr.Vijay Killedar, Adv. For the petitioner. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI, J. 1st April, 2011 PC: Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent taken up for hearing. By way of present petition the petitioner challenges the order dated 13.10.2010 vide which the application filed by the present petitioner below Ex. 82 for direction that the applications filed for temporary injunction by the petitioner and the defendant should be heard together. I find that it is in the interest of justice both the applications filed for temporary injunction by the plaintiff as well as the defendant are decided together. If the applications are decided separately there is possibility of conflicting orders being passed. In that view of the matter the impugned order is quashed and set aside. Application filed below Ex.82 stands allowed. Rule made absolute in aforesaid terms with no order as to costs.