sihgfe Bengt, .IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATfISGARH AT BILASPLJR , (cm- . WRIT PETITION (S) No; $WB§3 OF 2009 i I I I i I S i I PETITIONER : Jamuna Praséd Dahire Son Of Antram DaHire, aged about 46 years, Resident of Gourella, Tahsil I Pendraroad, Distict ’Biiaspur (c.G.). ‘ ’ VERSUS 1(’ State of Chhattisgarh; through: .Th'e Secretary, Department of D.K.S. Tribal , Developmentk Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). . The Conector (Tribal Development), Bilaspur (C.G.). 3. ‘ The Assistant CommiSsion‘er, Tribal Development, Bilaspur (C.G.). 4. fi‘he Chief Executive Officer, Janpad District _ Panchayat ‘Gourella, Bilaspur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER-ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF I -INDIA_ FOR ISSUANCE OF ,A _WRIT IN THE NATURE OF l MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION,'CERTIORARI ETC. OR IANY OTHER . DIRECTION OR ORDER To DO IUSTICE IN THE MAI-rm. DETAILS OF THE PETITION r 2x t? m.m..m;R[5)m3333 _ 2003' mm 4W2?) dRIESI a h Ear :2; EEW‘? V Ri 5a ‘5F? \ sI WW#‘% t {5g z , * 3‘ §n 3‘ aw ' ‘y . 23.97.2009: Shri Prashant Jaiswal lea ned seniar counsei wiih Shri Shaif Khan advocate far the petiiioner Ms. Sunita Jain PL for th respondents/State. Counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the petitioner has an aiternative remedy 0f filing a i appeai against iheimeugned order af suspension dated 26.3200. He submits rhat the eeti’cioner is under suspension for iast one year and his representation is aiso pending since 27.5.2009. He s brniis ther a direction may be issued to ihe appeiiate authority to d cide the appeai so filed at an eariy date. To this prayer of the cou sel for the petitioner, $tate oounsei has no objection. Accordingiy, the petition s disposed oi with a direction that if ‘ the petitioner files an appeai wt‘nin a period of one month fromthe date of receipt of copy of this rder, the same shall be decided by the appeilate authority within a further period of two months from the date of its presentation. t is made ciear that this Court has not commented on the merits of the case and the authorities concerned are free to decide the appeai of the petitioner strictiy in accordance with law. Sd/- Pritink‘er‘ “Biwaker Judge r 1" r v r r‘wmwwmwqwweinset”; “3%? .