IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 3571 of 2008 Between: G.Vijaya Laxmi W/o. Sri G. Dayanand, No. 19-2- 227/1/A,situated at Bahadurpura, Hyderabad. rep. by her GPA G. Srikanth, S/o. Sri G.Dayanand, Aged : 25 years, R/o.18-6-801, Laldarwaza, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND Greated Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Rep. by its Commissioner, Situated at Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent not to interfere in the peaceful physical possession of the Petitioner over left over portion after demolishing the portion aﬀected by road widening vide notice No.1936/RW/ACP/C2/MCH/2007 dated 14.03.2007 issued by the Respondent in respect of the property bearing Muniocipal No.19-2-227/1/A/7, situated at Bahadurpura, Hyderabad, bounded by NORTH : Neighbour's Property, SOUTH : Neighbour's Property, EAST : Neighbour's Property, WEST : Road, and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper under the circumstances of this case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.SHARAD SANGHI Counsel for the Respondent : SMT.KALPANA EKBOTE The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause of action in this writ petition does not survive and therefore, the writ petition is infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date:18th October, 2008. cs ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRK}