IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 3732 of 2011 Date of decision: 25.05.2011 ________________________________________________________________________ Kewal Ram. ...Petitioner. Versus. State of H.P. & others. ...Respondents. Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph,C.J. The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma,J. ________________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. AG with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG, for respondents No. 1 to 3. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petition is filed with the following prayers: “1. That writ in the nature of certiorari may kindly be issued to quash the impugned Office Order dated 23.4.2011, bearing Endorsement No. 364 (Annexure P-8), issued by the Office of respondent No. 3 respondent No. 4, vide which, the office order dated 4.4.2011 bearing Endorsement No. 68 (Annexure P-1), has been ordered to be withdrawn without any authority of law and without any prior permission of the higher authorities, despite petitioner's having submitted his joining report on 6.4.2011 vide Annexure P-2 and subsequent joining reports vide Annexures P-3 to P-6 in the office of respondent No. 3. 2. That writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued, directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue to work as Gram Rojgar Sewak in the following Panchayats falling under Gram Panchayat Circle Bhallona, Tehsil Sangrah, District Sirmour, till he completes his normal tenure of 3 to 5 years:- ...2... (i) Sangna, Tehsil Sangrah, District Sirmour, H.P. (ii) Satahan, Tehsil Sangrah, District Sirmour, H.P. (iii) Bhallona, Tehsil Sangrah, District Sirmour, H.P. (iv) Gehal, Tehsil Sangrah, Distract Sirmour, H.P. 2. It is seen that the petitioner has submitted a representation, Annexure P-7, before the third respondent. However, no action has been taken by the third respondent for forwarding the same to the second respondent. There will be a direction to the third respondent to forward Annexure P-7, representation within a week to the second respondent. Thereafter, the second respondent will take appropriate action in the matter in accordance with law within another one week. 3. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also pending application(s) if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice (Justice V.K. Sharma) Judge 25th May, 2011 (jai/virender)