: 1 : IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1667 OF 2008 OF MOTION NO.1667 OF 2008 OF MOTION NO.1667 OF 2008 IN IN IN INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL (L.) NO.1173 OF 2008 TAX APPEAL (L.) NO.1173 OF 2008 TAX APPEAL (L.) NO.1173 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax, . City - VII, Mumbai ...Appellant V/s. Pankaj Piyush Trade & Investment Ltd. ...Respondent Mr.A.D. Kango, Advocate, for the Appellant. Mr.B.V. Jhaveri, Advocate, for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & A.V. A.V. A.V. NIRGUDE, JJ. NIRGUDE, JJ. NIRGUDE, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 9TH JUNE, 2008. : 9TH JUNE, 2008. : 9TH JUNE, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant and for the Respondent. 2. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of delay of 26 days in filing the Appeal. Perused the Notice of Motion and the affidavit-in-support thereof. For the reasons stated therein, sufficient cause is made out. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafides on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). : 2 : [A.V. [A.V. [A.V. NIRGUDE, J.] NIRGUDE, J.] NIRGUDE, J.] [DR. [DR. [DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.] S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.] S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]