IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH JANUARY 2008 / 26TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 11516 of 2006(U) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ V.SUMITHRA, D/O.LATE BALAN, AGED 44, "REVATHY", POONAYIL CHERRY, PARAVOOR VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.VENUGOPALAN NAIR RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOLLAM REVENUE DIVISION, KOLLAM. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PARAVOOR VILLAGE, KOLLAM. 3. SMT.LEELA, VADAKKETHODIYIL VEEDU, POONAYIL CHERRY, PARAVOOR VILLAGE, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.G.BHAGAVAT SINGH GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO: 11516/2006 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1. COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFOREE THE R1 DT. 6/2/2006. EXT.P2. COPY OF THE REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE R2 TO THE R1 DT. 1/3/2006. EXT.P3. COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE R1 DT. 9/3/2006. EXT.P4. COPY OF THE REQUEST SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R2 DT. 6/4/06. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL. True copy tga ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 11516 OF 2006 U = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 16th January, 2008 J U D G M E N T Based on a report that was submitted by the Village Officer, the 1st respondent has passed Ext. P3 order directing cutting and removal of a tamarind tree standing in the property of the 3rd respondent. It is stated that this order has not been implemented till date and that even the reminders also have not evoked any positive response. 2. In view of the fact that Ext. P3 order has already been issued and if Ext. P3 is still in force, there is no reason for its non- implementation. Accordingly, I dispose of this writ petition that the 1st respondent shall take steps for the implementation of the order, if the same has not been reversed or modified subsequently. This the 1st respondent shall do with notice to the 3rd respondent and as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 6 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-