1 1. D.B.Civil Special Appeal(Writ) No.658/2008 Prashant Sapre V/s The State of Raj. & ors. 2. D.B.Civil Special Appeal(Writ) No.1160/2008 Ashok Dhaka V/s The State of Raj. & ors. 17.12.2008 Hon'ble the Chief Justice Mr.Narayan Roy Hon'ble Mr.Justice Raghuvendra S.Rathore Mr.Prahlad Singh for the appellants. Heard counsel for the appellants. Both these appeals since arise out of the common order they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this order. The writ applications filed by the several writ petitioners including the appellants were disposed of with the following directions:- “Accordingly, the writ petitions are allowed. The respondents are directed to approve and implement the Rules so framed by the employees of the Rajasthan Sports Council as early as possible preferably within three months and further make regular recruitment on the post of encadred under the Rules within four months thereafter from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. It is also expected from the authorities concerned to give age relaxation to the petitioners and other similarly situated persons if required for recruitment first time to be made under the Rules. Though it is discretion of the recruitment/selection body to lay down criteria for selection for different posts, however, there may be some weightage to the experience of the persons like the petitioners who are working for last so many years, may be on contractual basis and under interim orders passed by this Court. With all hope and trust, it is expected from the respondents to earnestly comply with the directions issued above at the earliest. Till any fresh recruitment is made, the petitioners may be continued on the post on which they are working and employed on the same terms and conditions they were appointed.” Looking to the directions, it appears that reliefs have been granted to the writ-petitioners and a further precaution was taken that till any fresh 2 recruitment is made, the petitioners may continue on the post on which they were working and employed on the same terms and conditions they were appointed. In view of the directions aforesaid, the writ petitioners-appellants could not have any reasonable ground to challenge the order impugned. These appeals in that view of the matter are dismissed as passing of some orders would be empty formality. (Raghuvendra S.Rathore)J. (Narayan Roy)C.J. Parmar