IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION No.11512 OF 2011 Between: C.C. Narasimha ..... Petitioner AND The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Falaknuma Depot, Hyderabad. ..... Respondent The Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION No.11512 OF 2011 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed to declare the action of the respondent in paying the lesser amount under Staff Retirement Benefit Scheme (SRBS) without taking into consideration of Pay Revision Scales 2005 and also continuity of service as per in award in ID No.84/2006, dated 02.02.2009, as arbitrary, illegal and also violative of Article 14, 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent to pay the difference of SRBS retirement benefits as per Pay Revision Scales 2005. 2. As seen from the award in ID No.84/2006, dated 02.02.2009, the Labour Court-I at Hyderabad directed the respondent for payment of 50% of the back wages from the date of his removal from service till he attains the age of superannuation and also pay all the pensionary benefits basing on the continuity of service to the petitioner. 3. As far as the payment of back wages of the petitioner is concerned, the petitioner made a representation on 02.05.2009 to the respondent to pay the retirement benefits considering the continuity of service and to fix the salary from the date of removal and also to pay the back wages. The petitioner also filed E.P.No.6 of 2009 on the file of the Labour Court-I, Hyderbad. The respondent corporation filed W.P.No.18893 of 2009 before this Court challenging the award. This Court granted interim stay of impugned order on 09.09.2009 to the extent of payment of back wages only. 4. If the petitioner is aggrieved in not passing any orders with regard to the payment of terminal benefits, the remedy is otherwise to what extent petitioner is entitled to the amount under Staff Retirement Benefit Scheme has to be decided in the execution petition pending before the Labour Court. Hence, the Writ Petition is devoid of merit and is liable to be dismissed. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed leaving open the remedies available to the petitioner under law. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ (K.C.BHANU, J) Dated: 7th June, 2011 KL HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION No.11512 OF 2011 7th June, 2011 KL