( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1646 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1646 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1646 OF 2007 Intelligence Officer, Narcotic Control Bureau, Mumbai .. Applicant. Versus Irshad Ahmed Ansari .. Respondent. Mr.D.N.Salvi for the applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste, A.P.P. for the State. None for the respondent. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 3rd June, 2008. DATED : 3rd June, 2008. DATED : 3rd June, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Mr.D.N.Salvi for the applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste, learned A.P.P. for the State. None for the respondent. 2. The respondent has been granted bail in N.D.P.S. Special Case No.204 of 2006 by speaking order dated 13.4.2007. The record shows that according to the prosecution, the Chemical Analysis Report in respect of sample packet done by F.S.L., Kalina shows that no heroine was detected in a sample. However, it was tested positive for Alprozolam. The report given by Deputy Chief Commissioner goes to show that the sample contains heroine. In substance, the learned Special Judge was impressed by the fact that the reports give different opinions as regards the quality of the material which was forming part of the ( 2 ) sample. This seems to have been considered by the learned Special Judge for the purposes of coming to the conclusion that the case put up by the prosecution is not made out and that is how the bail has been granted. 3. It is pertinent to note that the order granting bail is of 13.4.2007. Now that the order is passed, it would not be proper to rescind the order of bail. This is also a factor which goes against the State and to that extent, no interference is required. The application is, therefore, rejected. (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.)