IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 472 OF 2009 Shri Pakle Anil Murlidhar and others ......Petitioners V. The State of Maharashtra and another ...... Respondents Mr. M.S. Karnik for the Petitioners Mrs M.P. Thakur,AGP for respondent No.1 Mr. V.S. Tadke i/b Mr. M.V. Patil for respondent No.2 CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 10TH AUGUST, 2009. P.C. 1 Learned Counsel for the petitioners states that so far as prayer clause (a) is concerned, the petitiners' grievance is redressed. Hence to that extent the petition does not survive and therefore, the petitioners have requested him to withdraw the petition with a liberty to make representation to respondent No.2 as regards prayer clause (b). 2 In the circumstances the petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed i.e. so far as prayer clause (b) is concerned, it will be open to the petitioners to make a representation to the 2nd respondent. If such a representation is made, the 2nd respondent shall consider it independently and in accordance with law and communicate the result thereof to the petitioner. 3 The petition is disposed of as withdrawn. A.A. SAYED J. SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.