e9 °\J HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ffi^; PETmONER RE8PONDENTS WRTT PETITION fCrt No. 3655 of2008 Rajjak Ali, aged about 30 yesas S/o Shri Oulzar Ali, Oecupation : Elected Representative, Vice Pcesident, Janpad Panchayat, Kartala, Distriet Korba Chhattisgarh. VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisearh Through Secretary, Govemment of Chhattisgarh, Deparhnent of Home (Police) Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur Chhattisgarh 2. Director General of PQUee, Police Headquarters, Rayiur, Chhattisgarh 3. Inspector Geneal of Poliee, Bilaspur Raiige, District Bilaspur, Chhattisearh. 4. Superinteiident ofPolice, District Korba, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmJTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Me Shri Satish K. Aanihotel. J. Present: Shri Dheeraj Kumar Wankhede, Advocate for Ihe petitioner. Sliri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORALORDER >BI Amit (Passed on 09mday of Septpmber, 2Q08) The petitioner, by Ifais petition, seeks a directioa/du'ections to the respondent aufhorities to provide security to him. Shri Thakur, leamed Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents, on the basis of retum dated 5.8.2008, submits that several cruamal cases of serious nature are pending trial against the petitioner before the crinunal courts. The police authorities have already examined and have not found anv threat pereeption aeainst the petitioner. Be that as it may, wifhout expressing any opinion on tte merits ofthe case, liberty is reserved to fhe petitioner to make appropriate application for security, if so advised, before Ihe coacemed courts where Ifae cases against the petttioner are pendine trial. In view ofthe foregoinfe the petition stan<fc disposed of. Consequently, I.A. No. 1, application for graat of ititerim relief, also stands disposed o£ -——^^^_— Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judee