IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No 12328 OF 2004 Between: M/s. Sri Kedarnath silk Mills, Plot No. 59 & 60, Kattedan Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, rep by Sole Proprietor, Shiv Shanker Agarwal ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Transmission Corporation of A.P., Ltd., (A.P. Transco) repby Chief Managing Director, Vidyut Soudha, Khairatabad, Hyderabad 2 Central Power Distribution Company of A.P., (AP Transco ) rep by Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad 3 The Superintending Engineer, Operation Circle, Central Power Distribution Company of A.P., Ltd., (AP Transco) RR Circle, Mint Compound, Hyderabad 4 The Senior Accounts Officer, Operation Circle, Central Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd., (AP Transco) RR Circle, Mint Compound, Hyderabad 5 The General Manager, District Industries Centre, Industries Department A.P., Balanagar, Ranga Reddy District ....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ or order of direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in extending 25% rebate during the closure period from 21- 3-2001 to 21-10-2001 by deducting 25% rebate from the minimum bills as highly illegal, arbitrary unjust and void and consequently direct the respondents to extend the 25% rebate on power tariff for the 71/2 months unexpired incentive period from 28-3-2002 to 13-11-2003. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D.V.NAGARJUNA BABU Counsel for the Respondent : O.MANOHAR REDDY(SC FOR APTRANSCO) The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No 12328 OF 2004 O R D E R: It is submitted by the learned counsel for petitioner as well as the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents that the subject matter of this writ petition is covered by a decision of this court in W.P.No.5453 of 2002, dated 20.08.2008. Recording the submission of the learned counsel on either side, the writ petition is dismissed, in terms of the decision in W.P.No.5453 of 2002, dated 20.08.2008. _________________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J June 22, 2009 YVL