r $. IN THE HON'BLE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR '.P. (S) N0. hh^ 2011 ^^l^-"^ '^.^' ^^2V ^f.^'i €^:y^ ~^y .. 2. / Ashok Kumar Verma, Aged about 39 years, S/o Shri Oukhawa Ram Verma, Secretary (Panchayat Karmi) (5ram / Block Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham- 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary Panchayat, b.K.S. Chief Executive Officer, bistn'ct 4. The Colletor, Distt Kobirdham-(C.6.) WRIT PETTTTON UN&ERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTTON OF_INDIA The petitioner most humbly and respectfully begs to submit as Particulars of the Peti'ti'oner As stated in cause tsfte above. 5hOX mcN HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH : BILASPU! WRilEEimpN (S) N0. 4487 OFJQ11 Ashok KumarVerma RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others iWr't Petition under Articie 226 of the CQnstitution of tndiai Singie oench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- 3. Shri Anii Singh Rajput, Shri P.K.Bhaduri. Pane tefor the petifionei for the State. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 10th day of August, 2011) Learned counsel appearing for the petitloner submits that the petitioner has been transferred by the Impugned order dated 15.07.2011 (Annexure P-1) working as Panchayat Karmi from Village Panchayat Majgaon, Biock Kawardha, to viliage Panchayat Podi, Biock Bodta, whic'n is contrary to the decision of this Court in Om Prakash v. State of C-hha sga,'h & Others. The instant case is squareiy covered by the decision of this Court in Om Prakash Leaned counsel appearing for the State submits that in view of the order passed in Om Prakash tsupra), this order is not sustainabie. However, Siberty may be granted to the respondents to pass appropriate order, in accordance with law on its own merits. In view of foregoing, the impugned order dated 15.07.2011 (Annexure P-1) in resoect ofthe Detitioner is auashed. Accordingty, the writ petluon is allowed to the above extent.No order asto costs. Sd/- SatishK-Agnihotri Judge Writ.Petttion (S) No.3236of2010, decided on 05.08.2011