IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 766 of 2010 Shyam Chand and two others. … Petitioners. Versus State of Uttarakhand and two others … Respondents. Mr. Siddhartha Bisht, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. N.P.Sah, Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Arvind Vashist, Advocate for the respondent no. 3-Bank. Date May 20, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned recovery certificate dated 26-4-2010 (Annexure-3). Further prayer for writ of mandamus directing the respondent nos. 2 and 3 to take humanitarian view in favour of the petitioners to reconcile the matter as per Rules applicable to banks regarding loans like one time settlement, exemption of interest etc. According to the petitioners, petitioners’ father Jhanda Ram took a loan of Rs. 5,50,000 for agricultural purpose from the respondent no.3-Union Bank Limited Rudrapur and an amount of Rs. 2,23,000/- was paid towards repayment of instalment. According to the petitioner, the amount shown in the recovery certificate is not correct. The petitioner is also entitled for subsidy of the amount and that rate of interest has wrongly been calculated. During the course of arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to make a representation to the Bank as well as the 2 Recovery Officer for correction of the recovery certificate. Permitted to withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to make a representation to the respondent- authorities. If the representation is made, the respondent no. 3- Bank as well as the Recovery Officer-Tehsildar, Gadarpur, district Udham Singh Nagar (respondent no.2) shall decide the representation, expeditiously, preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Certified copy of this order be issued to the learned counsel for the petitioner by tomorrow on payment of usual charges. (B.S.Verma, J.) RCP