1 JO294-10.sxw pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Judges Order No.294 of 2010 in Execution Application (L) No.936 of 2010 in Suit No. 2865 of 1994 Bhavesha Suresh Goradia .. Plaintiff v/s. Aviation Travels Pvt. Ltd. & Others ..Defendants Mr.Shailesh Shah i/b. Pandya Gandhi & Co. for the Plaintiff. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 27th October , 2010 P.C. : 1. Heard learned Counsel Mr. Shah for the plaintiff in support of draft Judges Order. The decree has been lodged for execution after the period of two years. In the normal course notice under Order 21 Rule 22 of CPC was required to be issued. By affidavit in support of this Judges Order dated 20.10.2010 it is sought to be contended by the plaintiff that if notice under Order 21 Rule 22 of CPC is issued it would take some time to have it disposed of and in the meantime the defendants would be able to dispose of the property and if that 2 JO294-10.sxw happens plaintiff would be deprived of the fruits of decree. I have perused the text of the affidavit dated 20.10.2010. For the reasons mentioned therein, I am satisfied that this is a fit case where notice under Order 21 Rule 22 of CPC can be dispensed with. Hence I sign the Judges Order so as to dispense with the notice under Order 21 Rule 22 of CPC. 2. Draft Judges Order is made absolute accordingly. 3. Plaintiffs to remove the office objections in the Execution Application on or before 30.11.2010, failing which the Execution Application shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution. The plaintiff to inform this order to the office and call upon the office to note down the objections. Said noting should be done on or before 12.11.2010. 4. Office to supply authenticated copy of this order to the plaintiff to enable them to attach it to the letter to the Prothonotary & Senior Master. [R.Y.GANOO, J.]