IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20075 of 2010 1. SUDU KHAN SON OF RAJA KHAN 2. BABLU KHAN SON OF HAFIZ KHAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----- 2. 14.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 498A, 323, 324 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation in the First Information Report is that the informant was variously tortured by her in-laws for reasons of non-fulfilment of dowry and since her husband had remarried another lady she was being tortured for this reason as well. The petitioner no.1 happens to be the nephew of the husband of the informant, whereas the petitioner no.2 is a co-villager and the allegation against them is that they had assisted the misdeeds of the husband of the informant. In view of such, in the event of surrender of the petitioners named above, within four weeks from today in connection with Ramnagar P.S.case No.137 of 2010, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha, West Champaran, subject to the conditions as laid down u/s.438(2) Cr.P.C. and (i) that one of the bailors will be a - 2 - close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners, (ii) that the petitioners shall undertake to be represented on the first date after cognizance and in case they fail to do so, their bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled, (iii) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on the date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iv) that the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/Fahad ( Anjana Prakash, J. )