IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17539 of 2009 MUNNA SINGH @ RANVIR KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 02.09.2009 Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail in a case instituted under section 366-A IPC. As per the allegation in the FIR, while the 16 years old daughter of the informant had gone to attend the call of nature, she was allegedly kidnapped by some unknown persons. It appears that subsequently the girl appeared before the Magistrate and made statements under section 164 Cr.P.C From the impugned order it appears that in her statement she made definite allegation against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that medical assessment of the girl shows her age to be about 19 years and there is no allegation of committing rape on her. It is further stated that there was some disputes over non-payment of the loan amount which the son of the informant had borrowed from the petitioner. Be that as it may, having regard to the facts appearing from the record, this Court does not find it a good case for extension of privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. His prayer for bail is accordingly rejected. 2 However, the petitioner may apply for regular bail which shall be considered on its own merit uninfluenced by the present order. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )