IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 26.11.2010 C.R.No.3446 of 2010 (O&M) Gram Panchayat Village Ghawaddi ...Petitioner Versus Naib Singh and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. Arun Palli, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Tushar Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) Challenge in the present revision petition is to the judgment and decree granted by the learned trial Court on 05.10.2009, decreeing summary suit for possession filed by the plaintiffs under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The learned trial Court found that the defendant-petitioner in its written statement has taken a plea that the plaintiffs were in illegal possession of the suit property and, therefore, the plaintiffs have been rightly dispossessed from the property in question. The learned trial Court has also found that the Gram Panchayat has, in fact, filed a petition under Section 7 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, to claim possession from the plaintiffs and that the said application was filed prior to the institution of the suit. On the said factual basis, the learned trial Court returned a finding that the plaintiffs were in possession of the suit property and have been forcible dispossessed. The reasoning given by the learned trial Court cannot be said to be suffering from any patent illegality or irregularity, which may warrant C.R.No.3446 of 2010 (O&M) any interference by this Court in its revisional jurisdiction. The findings recorded by the learned trial Court are based upon the pleadings of the defendant and the proceedings initiated by it before the competent Court. Thus, I do not find that any case is made out for exercising revisional jurisdiction of this Court. Dismissed. 26.11.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE 2