1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2407 OF 2009 Mr.Rajesh G. Saluja & anr. ... Petitioners v/s Valencia Co-op. Hsg.Socy.Ltd. ... Respondent Mr.G.M.Joshi for the petitioners. Mr.S.K.Shinde for the respondent No.1. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 14TH JULY, 2009 P.C.: 1. The petitioners challenge the orders passed by the Trial Court and the Appellate Court refusing the interim relief to them in the dispute filed by the petitioners. The petitioners had prayed before the Co-operative Court that the respondent Society should be directed to permit the petitioners to park their vehicle in the compound of the society and not to charge the petitioners at the rate of Rs.750/- per month for parking the vehicle. 2 2. Both the Trial Court and the Appellate Court have refused the interim relief prayed for by the petitioners. The Trial Court has observed that the petitioners had not made out a case to indicate that any parking place had been allotted to them when they purchased the flat. No material was brought on record by them to substantiate this fact. The Trial Court has then observed that, in view of the resolution passed by the society by which the manner of parking and allotment of places in the compound was decided and the amount to be charged was also decided, the petitioners had not challenged that resolution. 3. The orders do not indicate any perversity much less any infirmity requiring interference by this Court under its writ jurisdiction. 4. In my view, there is no error committed by both the Courts below. 5. Writ petition rejected. ..... 3