IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3394 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5602 OF 2007 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3393 OF 2005 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.918 OF 2000 V.M.Gadgil & ors. )..Applicants Versus Smt.Shalini Divekar & Ors. )..Respondents ---- Mr.Ketan R.parekh for the applicants. Mr.Vijay Pandey with Mr.Rahul Rao for respondents. ---- Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Date : 17.10.2008. PC CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3394 OF 2005 1. Learned Advocate for the appellants states that appellant no.3 has expired and so also appellant nos.4, 6, 8 & 9 have also expired. No steps have been taken for bringing their heirs on record. He states that in the circumstances, he had also filed Civil Application for transposing appellant no.3 as respondent and for deleting the names of deceased appellants 4, 6, 8 and 9. In the circumstances, he prays for deleting the names of appellant nos.3, 4, 6, 8 & 9. These appellants are therefore deleted at the risk of the applicants. Advocate to carry out amendment within a period of two weeks. As far as : 2 : remaining appellants are concerned, they have arrived at terms with the respondents and have filed consent terms which are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. Under the consent terms, the parties have decided to donate the disputed amount to a charity. In the circumstances, First Appeal is decreed in terms of the consent terms. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3393 OF 2005 . In view of the order passed in the aforesaid First Appeal, Civil Application does not survive and stands disposed off accordingly. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5602 OF 2007 . This is an application for deleting respondent no.1A who has expired. Civil Application is allowed and the respondent no.1A is deleted at the risk of the appellant and stands disposed off. (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J)