IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.164 of 2008 BINOD SHANKAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 19.11.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. There would be hardly any ground for this to review the order passed by this Court on 10.03.2008 in C.W.J.C. No. 9184 of 2005. In fact, when confronted, Mr. Mishra could not demonstrate any apparent error on the face of the record, though he tried to take help of Annexure-5 and paragraph No.7 of the writ application but then ultimately he had to accept that neither of the two could have made any difference in the ultimate result or the order that has been passed by this Court. In any view of the matter a wrong and erroneous consideration of any such material which is already on record, cannot be made a ground for review. Mr. Mishra, counsel for the petitioner then summits that while the doors for the writ petitioners has been shut and closed for forever, persons similarly situated have been given the some relief. This Court again is not in a position to make any comment on this specially when the statement made in paragraph No. 7 also has been wholly vague. However, it is made clear that in case, the petitioner may satisfy the respondents - 2 - that persons similarly situated have been given such relief after the same inordinate delay as in the case of the petitioner, it will always be open for the respondents to consider the same and pass a fresh order in favour of the petitioner. With the aforementioned observations and directions this Civil Review application is dismissed. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)