IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE TUESDAY, THE 12TH JUNE 2007 / 22ND JYAISHTA 1929 WP(C).No. 19549 of 2004(B) -------------------------- OS.267/2000 of PRL.SUB COURT,IRINJALAKUDA .................... PETITIONER: ------------ JAYADEVAN, KIZHAKOOTTU, THOTTIPPAL VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.T.M.CHANDRAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. KANAKAVALLY, W/O. KUTTATHIL NAGESH PULLUT VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK. 2. GIRIJABAI, S/O. SUBRAMANIAN, VALIYAVEETIL HOUSE, KIZHUTHANI PORTHISSERY VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN SRI.K.JAGADEESH SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.19549/2004 APENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 19.1.2004 IN I.A. NO.2321/04 IN O.S. NO.267/2000 PASSED BY THE SUB COURT, IRINJALAKUDA. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ---------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 19549 of 2004 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of June 2007 JUDGMENT Sri.T.M.Chandran, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is true that an appeal has been preferred by his client. In view of the above submission, the writ petition is disposed of permitting the parties to agitate all the grounds in the appeal. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. dpk