IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.BALACHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD JULY 2008 / 1ST SRAVANA 1930 RSA.No. 35 of 2005 ---------------------- AS.22/2003 of ADDL.SUB COURT, KOCHI OS.185/2002 of PRL.M.C., KOCHI .................... APPELLANT : APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF ---------------------------------------- SAROJINI PAI, W/O.SADANANDA PAI, AGED 49 YEARS, RESIDING AT IV/1112 A, MANJA BHAGAVATHI LANE, NORTH CHERLAI, CHERLAI MURI, MATTANCHERRY VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SHAJI P.CHALY SMT.JASMIN.M.M. RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS --------------------------------------------------- 1. SADASIVA SHENOY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O.LATE G.HARI SHENOY, AT PRESENT RESIDING AT IV/IIII, MANJA BHAGAVATHI LANE, NORTH CHERLAI, CHERLAI MURI, MATTANCHERRY VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. SACHIN SHENOY, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, S/O.SADASIVA SHENOY, AT PRESENT RESIDING AT IV/IIII, MANJA BHAGAVATHI LANE, NORTH CHERLAI, CHERLAI MURI, MATTANCHERRY VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. AVINASH SHENOY, S/O.SADASIVA SHENOY, AGED 24 YEARS, AT PRESENT RESIDING AT IV/IIII, MANJA BHAGAVATHI LANE, NORTH CHERLAI, CHERLAI MURI, MATTANCHERRY VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.V.A.KASTHURI FOR R1 TO 3 THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.P.BALACHANDRAN, J. ------------------------------------------------ R. S. A. No.35 of 2005 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 27th day of June, 2008 ORDER Counsel for the respondents submits that the compromise petition signed by the respondents had been entrusted for signature of the appellant, but the appellant has not hitherto returned it despite the fact that all the terms in the compromise petition has been worked out and the respondents are unable to dispose of their property despite the fact that the demands of the appellant are all met as agreed to and that a pathway also is provided by the side of 'B' and 'C' schedule properties which runs straight into the property of the plaintiff. She submits that details of the works done in performance of the terms of the compromise and a plan showing the pathway provided etc. can be got signed from the respondents along with the copy of R. S. A. No.35 of 2005 -2- the compromise petition signed by the respondents and that for the purpose the case be adjourned and posted after two weeks. Hence, post on 14/07/08. K.P.BALACHANDRAN, JUDGE kns/-