: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6051 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.6051 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.6051 OF 2008 Gopal Bhaurao Deshmukh ...Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. Ms.Deepa Sawant i/by Shri C.G.Gavnekar , advs. for the Petitioner. Mrs.J.S.Pawar Addl.G.P. for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM: Bilal Nazki CORAM: Bilal Nazki CORAM: Bilal Nazki & J.H.Bhatia,JJ J.H.Bhatia,JJ J.H.Bhatia,JJ. DATE : 3rd December, 2008. DATE : 3rd December, 2008. DATE : 3rd December, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Grievance of the petitioner is that application filed under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act is not decided by the respondents. Counter has been filed in which it is stated that the judgment on the basis of which petitioner claims higher compensation in terms of Section 28A have been appealed against and are pending before the High Court. Therefore, applications under Section 28A will have to wait till the disposal of the appeals. 2. We do not find any illegality in the course adopted by the respondents, and, therefore, we dispose off this petition directing respondents to consider the : 2 : applications of the petitioner after the appeals mentioned in the counter affidavit are decided by the High Court. (Bilal Nazki, J.) (Bilal Nazki, J.) (Bilal Nazki, J.) (J.H.Bhatia, J.) (J.H.Bhatia, J.) (J.H.Bhatia, J.)