IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 578 of 2006 (MB) 1. Sanjay Tayal s/o Late Shri V.K. Tayal, R/o 109 Bankhandi, Rishikesh, Police Station Rishikesh, District Dehradun. 2. Anil Gupta s/o Shri Gopi Chand Gupta, R/o 89/1 Chandreshwar Marg, Maya Kund, Rishikesh, Police Station Rishikesh, District Dehradun ……….. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Senior Superintendent of Police, Dehradun. 2. Station House Office, Police Station, Rishikesh, District Dehradun 3. Sutish Gupta s/o Late Chandra Sen Gupta, R/o Ganga Kripa, Mukti Dham, Swarg Ashram, Police Station Muni-ki-reti, Police Station Muni-ki-reti, District Tehri Garhwal ……….. Respondents ………. Sri Lok Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri H.C. Pande, A.G.A. for respondents 1 and 2. Sri Vinod Sharma, Advocate for respondent no. 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C. J. Hon’ble P.C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Sri Lok Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri H.C. Pande, A.G.A. for respondents 1 and 2. Sri Vinod Sharma, Advocate for respondent no. 3. 2. Sri Pande, the learned Additional Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by petitioners – Sanjay Tayal and Anil Gupta seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against them has now become infructuous as the police after the completion of the investigation has filed charge-sheet against both the petitioners before the concerning Court. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Consequently, the interim order dated 10.05.2006 stands vacated automatically. (P.C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 08.08.2006 08.08.2006 A