HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY Crl. P. No. 6043 of 2009 Date : 19.08.2009 Between: Vanka Vasudeva Rao @ Vasu ……. Petitioner and State of AP., rep. By its Public Prosecutor, High Court of AP., Hyderabad. …….. Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY Crl.P.No. 6043 of 2009 O R D E R: The petitioner apprehends arrest in Crime No.108 of 2009 of Chilakalapudi Police Station, initially registered for the offence under Section 324 read with 34 IPC. and subsequently, altered to Section 307 read with 34 IPC. The accusation made against the petitioner is that he along with two others, who have been arrayed as Accused Nos. 2 and 3, attacked the de facto-complainant and caused bleeding injury to him. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. A further submission has been made that Accused Nos. 2 and 3 have been granted anticipatory bail and, therefore, the petitioner may also be granted bail as his case stands on the same footing as that of Accused Nos. 2 and 3. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the Application. As seen from the report presented by the de facto-complainant, he received bleeding injury in the hands of the petitioner. In view of the specific accusation levelled against him in the report, the petitioner does not deserve for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to surrender himself before the Court concerned and move an Application seeking regular bail, in which event, the Court concerned shall dispose of the same, as expeditiously as possible. ------------------------------------ (B. SESHASAYANA REDDY, J) 19th August 2009 ksld