1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 936/2010 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.10454 /2010 (Ganesh s/o Saoji Kaikade vs. Naresh s/o Saoji Kaikade and others) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATED : DECEMBER 16, 2010 Mrs. Bodade, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of respondent no.7 Collector, Nagpur has submitted a copy of the report dated 16/11/2010 in the Court today. It is stated in the report received from the respondent no.7 that the Tahsildar had made an enquiry in regard to financial condition of appellant Shri Ganesh Kaikade and it was found that Shri Ganesh Kaikade was working in a private Office of P&W(Internet) and also has a Tea Shop. It is stated in the report that the yearly income of Shri Ganesh Kaikade is Rs.48.,000/- and he has a residential house of his own. On perusal of the report submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, it appears that 2 appellant is not an indigent person. The appellant is, therefore, required to pay the necessary Court fee. Six weeks' time is granted to the appellant for payment of Court Fee. The miscellaneous civil application is rejected. Four weeks' time is granted to the appellant for taking necessary steps to bring legal heirs of deceased respondent no.4 on record. JUDGE khj