IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44391 of 2008 PRAMOD SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.11.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In view of the fact that the bail application of the petitioner has been rejected on two previous occasions, this Court will not even remotely go into the question on merits. The only other fresh material which has been pressed into action for claiming parity of grant of bail is an order passed by this Court dated 23.6.2008 whereby and whereunder one Rajesh Kumar Singh is said to have been released on bail in Cr.Misc.No. 9659/2008. This Court having perused the aforesaid order and the earlier order passed while rejecting the bail of the petitioner is still of the opinion that the petitioner’s complicity in this case does not require him to be released on bail. The application for bail is, accordingly, dismissed. Taking into account that this is a case triable by a court of Sessions, the trial court is directed to expedite the 2 trial and ensure that the trial itself is completed within a period of nine months from today. In the event the trial is not concluded within a period of nine months from today, the petitioner shall initially move the trial court for grant of bail and the court below will indicate in the order as to why the trial has not been concluded. It is only thereafter the petitioner shall be at liberty to move this Court. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/