IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7425 of 2011 Sunil Kumar Jha Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 2 09.08.2011 Argument is being made on behalf of the petitioner by way of explanation for not reporting back to his original place of posting at Sitamarhi after being refused joining at Muzaffarpur. The circumstances indicated in annexure -8 is not convincing, obviously, for the simple reason that the petitioner was told in so many words to report back to Sitamarhi. His explanation is that he was waiting for a direction from Divisional Commissioner who happens to be the authority for Inter District Transfer and, therefore, he waited for a direction in this regard from 25.7.2005 to 5.6.2006 is not convincing at all. The findings given by the Divisional Commissioner, issued on the direction of C.W.J.C. No. 17704 of 2009 and the reason assigned therein are cogent and valid. Therefore, annexure-14 does not require any interference. If the petitioner has not worked due to his own volition he could not be given benefit of salary of that period. The writ petition is dismissed. Rahman/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi , J.)