IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.10878 of 2009 Between: Penumetsa Sree Lakshmi, rep.by her GPA Holder P.Ranga Raju, S/o.Sivaramaraju R/o.Alkapuram P.V.Palem Mandal, Bapatla, Guntur District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Southern Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Limited, rep.by its Assistant Accounts officer Electricity Revenue office,Bapatla, Guntur District 2 The Southern Power Distribution company of Andhra Pradesh Ltd., at Tirupathi, rep.by its Executive Authority Tirupati, Chittoor District 3 The Divisional Electrical Engineer (Operations), Tenali, Guntur District 4 The Assistant Divisional Engineer, (Distribution) AP Southern Power Distribution Company ltd., Bapatla, Guntur District 5 The Assistant Engineer (Operation), APCPDCL, Karlapalem, Bapatla, Guntur District .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR. NANDIGAM KRISHNA RAO FOR MR.C.A.R.SESHAGIRI RAO Counsel for the Respondents:MR. S.V.RAMANA FOR MR.O.MANOHER REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER: The dispute pertaining to the petitioner’s liability is admittedly, the subject matter of a civil suit bearing O.S.No.146 of 2006 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Bapatla. On the petitioner’s own showing, certain interim orders have also been passed by the said Court. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is that despite pendency of the civil suit, power supply has been stopped to his service connection by the respondents. Having heard Sri Nandigam Krishna Rao, learned counsel representing Sri C.A.R.Seshagiri Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the view that appropriate remedy for the petitioner is to approach the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Bapatla, in which, the civil suit referred to above is pending, and seek appropriate orders therein. In the face of the apprehension expressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that consideration of the petitioner’s application to be filed may get delayed, it is needless to observe that as and when appropriate application is filed by the petitioner for restoration of power supply, the learned Senior Civil Judge, Bapatla will act with expedition and dispose of the same after hearing both parties. Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition, WPMP.No.13984 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 4th JUNE, 2009. Note: issue c.c. in three (3) days. kvni