IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7769 of 2010 SANJEEV KUMAR TIWARI @ CHELHARA @ SANJIVA TIWARI @ CHETHARA . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 15.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The defence of the petitioner in a Police case under Sections 302/34 of the Penal Code from the First Informant Report and the materials from the case diary noticed during investigation in the impugned order is that there is no eye witness, his name has transpired on suspicion only when even during investigation no cogent material beyond suspicion appears to be transpiring. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.- I, Banka in connection with S.T. No. 1122/09 (arising out of Shambhuganj P.S. Case No. 86/09). P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)