~<sa-»- ^ ~<sa-»- jo3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHJVT BILASPUR FIRSTAPPEAL No. /^ OF 2010. APPELLANTS PLAINTIFFS /:!. Smt. Afroz Begura, aged about 41 years, widow of Mohammed Iqbal Khan, \^^ ^^'^^ ....•••;;':^€>J ^ •y'' ^ Ku. Tabbassum, aged about 14 years, D/o. late Mohammed Iqbal Khan, 3. Mohammed IsT%-,f)z/)^^/ aged about 12 years, S/o. late Mohammed Iqbal Khan, A. Mohamnied Israr, aged about 10 years, S/o. late Mohammed Iqbal Khan, Appellants No. 2 to 4 Minors, through : Next Friend Mother (Appellant No. 1) Smt. Afroz Begum, W/o. late'Mohammed Iqbal Khan, All Residents of C/o. Mohanimed Zafar Khan, Wireless Colony, Taarbahar, DISTRICT - BILASPURJC, GJ VERSUS RESPONDENTS DEFENDANTS Habibur Rehm.an, aged about 68 years, S/o. late Inayat - Ullah Khan, !fc.. 1;. Smt. Maqbool'Begum, aged about 91 years, Wd/o. late Inayat-Ullah Khan, Both Resident of Near Bohra Khaparganj, Distt. BILASPUR (C. G.) Mehmooda Begum, aged about 53 years, W/o. Moharamed Abrar Khan, D/o. late Inayat - Ullah Khan, Resident of Behind Niharika Cinema, BALCO, District - KORBA (C. G.) 4. Smt. Arana Begum, aged about 50 years, W/o. Mohammed Afzal Khan, D/o. late Inayat - Ullah Khan, Resident of Near Keshav Atta ChakkL, Rajendra Nagar, District - BILASPUR (C.G.) .,5. Mohammed Ibrahim Khan, aged about 49 years, S/o. late Inayat - Ullah Khan, Resident of Near Dua Tent House, Karbala Road, District BILASPUR (C. G.) 6. Rahul Bajpai, aged about 50 years, S/o. Rohini Kuraar Bajpai, Resident of Near Idgah Chowk, District- BILASPUR (C. G.) 7. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Collector, District - BILASPUR (C. G.) Suit Valued - 32,25,400/- Coyrt fees^ paid as in trial Court \^y" FIRST APPEAL UNDER SECTION 96 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 HIGH COUKT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR F.A. No. 14 of 2010 AppeUants ~-'^\ Sm.t. Afroz Begum. & ofhers Versus Respondents Habibur Retmian & others FIRSTAPPEAL UNDER SECTION 96 OFTHE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 1908 DB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agirihotri & Hon'ble Shri Maniudra Mohaii Shrivastava, JJ Sbri Ayaj Naved, Advocate for the appeUants. Sbri S. K. Mishra, Panel Lawyer for the respondent No.7. O RD E R (oral) ( Passed on this 12th day ofMareh, 2010) Heard. 1. Leamed counsel appeariug for fhe appeUants, on iastructions, subinits that the appeUants seek permission of this Court to withdrawn this appeal with Uberty to present a fi-esh suit. 2. Learned counsel appearir^ for the respondent No.7/State has no objection. 3. In view of fhe foregoing, the appeal is disnussed as withdrawn with the afore-stated liberty, if so advised. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge Thaliur SJS!f~-^BSreSSXSe-': -,=*-?0.^.