IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER THURSDAY, THE 2ND AUGUST 2007 / 11TH SRAVANA 1929 RP.No. 73 of 2006(P) -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.11070/2005 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/ RESPONDENT IN WP(C) --------------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER RESPONDENT/PETITIONER IN THE WP(C) ----------------------------------------------- K.N.ACHUTHAN, AGED 67 YEARS, S/O.VELU, KOTTAYIL HOUSE, CHETTIPADI POST, PARAPPANANGADI VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. A.J. VARGHESE ADV. SMT.LATHA PRABHAKARAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: A.K. BASHEER, J. -------------------------- R.P. NO. 73 OF 2006 IN W.P.(C). NO. 11070 OF 2005 --------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of August, 2007 O R D E R Having heard learned counsel for the review petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, I do not find any ground warranting review of the judgment. 2. As rightly pointed out by learned counsel for the writ petitioner, Annexure A(1) Govt. Order referred to in the review petition will not apply in the case of a part-time teacher who had retired from service as full-time teacher. What has been referred to in Annexure A(1) is only the case of pensionary benefits payable to part-time teachers. There is no merit in the review petition. It is accordingly dismissed. A.K. BASHEER, JUDGE vps A.K. BASHEER, JUDGE OP NO.20954/00 JUDGMENT 1ST MARCH, 2007