Crl. Misc. No.M-22630 of 2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-22630 of 2010 Date of Decision: September 22, 2010 Neena Goyal …..Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and others …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.Alok Jagga, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Amit Rana, DAG, Haryana. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioner seeks the quashing of FIR No. 216 dated June 15, 2010 under Sections 406, 420, 120-B IPC Police Station Sector 5, Panchkula on the basis of compromise. The said FIR was registered at the instance of respondent No.2- Rakesh Pahwa, alleging that the petitioner had received a sum of Rs.15 lacs and not executed the sale deed as per the agreement of sale. Crl. Misc. No.M-22630 of 2010 [2] The parties inform that the matter has been compromised. Complainant-Rakesh Pahwa present in the Court states that his claim has been satisfied. State counsel informs that on the basis of the investigation, the prosecution agency has opted not to present the challan and cancellation report has already been submitted. It will be open to the complainant- Rakesh Pahwa to agree to the cancellation report by appearing before the Illaqa Magistrate. Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. September 22, 2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE