{1} FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5278 OF 2006 Bank of Mah. Employees Union Vs. Bank of Maharashtra Office notes, office memorandum of coram, appearances, court’s order or directions and Registrar’s order. Court’s or Judge’s orders Shri V.J.Dixit Sr. Counsel for the petitioner Shri A.R.Joshi, advocate for respondent Nos.1 & 2. *** Coram : NARESH H.PATIL, J. N.D.DESHPANDE, J. Date: 11th June 2009. 01- In the light of para no.9 & 10 of the affidavit of the Bank, we find that the petition can be disposed of. The petitioner are entitled to file comprehensive representation to the bank at appropriate time to consider it in accordance with law. Hence the petition is disposed of. [N.D.DESHPANDE] [NARESH H.PATIL] JUDGE JUDGE /mda/0609/wp5278.06