IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 23721 of 2005 Between: 1 Tirumala Rao, S/o. Keshava Rao Murmura Village, Ramagundam Mandal, Karimnagar District. 2 R. Srinivas Rao, S/o. Narsinga Rao, Murmura Village, Ramagundam Mandal, Karimnagar District. 3 Buchirama Rao, S/o. Keshava Rao, Murmura Village, Ramagundam Mandal, Karimnagar District. 4 Govind Rao, S/o. Keshava Rao, Murmura Village, Ramagundam Mandal, Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Special Deputy Collector cum Land Acquisition Officer, Sripada Project, Yellampalli, NTPC, Salepalli Road, Near AVM Function Hall, NTPC, Ramagundum, Karimnagar District. 2 The District Collector, Karimnagar District, Karimnagar District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS calling for records pertaining to acquisition of land in Sy.No. 72 of Murmura Village, Ramagundam Mandal, Karimnagar District by the 1st Respondent for the purpose of "Sripada Project" and direct the Respondent to refer the matter pertaining to apportionment of compensation under L.A. Act to the Competent Civil Court under Section 30 of the L.A. Act, 1894 in view of the pendency of 'Lis' between the family members of the Petitioners pertaining to partition of the properties and also pendency of paritition suit in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Peddapally, Karimnagar District and consequently declare the action of the Respondents in not considering the Representations of the Petitioners dt. 23-10-2005 and Legal Notice dt. 11-10-2005 before proceedings to pass Award under section 11 & 12 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in the interest of Justice and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Corut deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.SUDHAKAR REDDY & ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : Oral order: There was no representation on 25-3-2008 when the matter was called, and therefore, the matter was directed to be listed today for dismissal. Even today, when the matter is taken up neither the petitioners are present nor there is any representation on their behalf. The writ petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 1st April, 2008 GRR To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies