IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Delay Condonation Application No.6474 of 2009 Impleadment Application No.2148 of 2010 Stay Vacation Application No.2149 of 2010 In Writ Petition No. 1524 of 2008 (M/S) Suryaveer Singh, S/o Sri Rajendra Singh, R/o Village-Udalhedi, Pargana Mangalaur, Tehsil- Roorkee, District Haridwar. ……Petitioner. Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand, through District Magistrate, Haridwar. 2. Tehsildar, Roorkee, District- Haridwar. …….Respondents. Mr. Rajendra Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Addl. C.S.C. for the State-respondents. Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Lok Pal Singh, Advocate for the intervenor. Dated:-09-04-2010 Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard on intervention/impleadment application No. 2148 0f 2010. The application has been moved by the applicant to implead in the writ petition. The proceeding was initiated on behest of the Gaon Sabha. The applicant has no locus to file the impleadment/intervention application. The impleadment/intervention application accordingly rejected. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing and set aside the order dated 04-08-2008 passed by the respondent No.2 i.e. Tehsildar whereby a direction was given to the petitioner and concerned department to remain present on 14-8-2008 on spot for measurement of the Plot No. 104. 2 According to the petitioner, the land of the petitioner is adjoining to the land of Kabristan. The petitioner has also filed an application for correction of map under Section 28 of the Land Revenue Act, the proceeding was abated by the Collector, Haridwar on the ground that in the village Section 4(2) notification was published and the village was under Consolidation operation. Copy of the order has been annexed as annexure No.5 to the writ petition. The grievance of the petitioner is that the village under Consolidation proceeding demarcation has to be made by the Consolidation Authority not by the Tehsildar in the administrative side. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record. Liberty is given to the petitioner to file objection against the notice impugned before the Tehsildar concerned and the Tehsildar concerned is directed to decide the objection of the petitioner in accordance with law before proceeding further for measurement. With the said direction and observation, the writ petition is disposed of finally. All pending applications stand disposed of accordingly. (B.S.Verma, J.) 09-04-2010 MK