IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 10148/2008 Decided on:17.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Prem Dass. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Nemo. For the Respondents: Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. for respondents No.1 and 2. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Petitioner has not completed 240 days in any calendar year. He has failed to substantiate under what provisions of law his son is entitled to appointment on compassionate grounds. 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 17.12.2010 *awasthi* 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?