IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY THE NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TEN :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION NO : 4319 of 2005 Between: B. Ranganayakulu, S/o Late Chitti Raju, ..... Petitioner AND 1. The Regional Information Engineer, Zone I & II, Information & Public Relations Department, RTC Complex, Visakhapatnam. 2 The Accountant General, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad - 500 004. .....Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction; i) declaring that the order of the A.P. Administrative Tribunal dated 27-1-2005 in O.A.No. 1726 of 2002 is erroneous to the extent of not deciding the question of correctness or otherwise of the order of stepping up of pay of the petitioner as Assistant Information Engineer and Assistant Executive Information Engineer on par with his junior Sri M. Dakshinamurthy with effect from 20-2-1992 made by the1st respondent by virtue of his order vide proceedings 1298/SA/99 dated 7-6-1999. ii) declaring that the said order stepping up of the pay of the petitioner on par with his junior Sri Dakshinamuthy made by the1st respondent on 7-6-1999 is according to law, principles of justice and equity and had become final and consequently the objections raised by the 2nd respondent vide proceedings pen-14-IV-R-601/SP- 59/2001-06/ADK, dated 23-1-2001 are untenable and inoperative. iii) directing the respondents to fix his monthly superannuation pension after taking into consideration the last pay drawn by him on the date of his retirement as per the relevant provisions of the Revised Pension Rules, 1980 and issue necessary orders within a time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court and iv) allowing the Writ Petition with costs; The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed herein and the order of the High Court dated 4-03-2010 made in WPMP. No. 3902 of 2009 and dated 23-4-2010 and upon hearing the arguments of SRI T. DURGA PRASAD RAO, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Govt. Pleader for Information and Public Relations for the respondent No.1, and of Sri Ponnam Ashok Goud, Asst. Solicitor General for the respondent No.2, the Court made the following: ORDER: Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 are present. Pursuant to the order of this court dated 23-04-2010 . Future presence is dispensed with for the present. List on 21-06-2010. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1. The Regional Information Engineer, Zone I & II, Information & Public Relations Department, RTC Complex, Visakhapatnam. 2 The Accountant General, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad - 500 004.( 1 & 2 by RPAD) 3.2 CCs to the G.P. for Information and Public Relation, High court of A.P.Hyderabad. 4. One C.C.to Sri Ponnam Ashok Goud, Asst. Solicitor General, High court of A.P.Hyderabad. (OPUC) 5. One C.C.to Sri T. Durga Prasada Rao Advocate. (OPUC) 6. one spare copy. HIGH COURT GR.J & NAJ DATED 9-06-2010 LIST ON 21-06-2010 ORDER W.P.NO. 4319 OF 2005 DIRECTION Bsr Dt. 10-6-2010 HIGH COURT GR.J & NAJ DATED 9-06-2010 LIST ON 21-06-2010 ORDER W.P.NO. 4319 OF 2005 DIRECTION