IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 28TH APRIL 2009 / 8TH VAISAKHA 1931 WP(C).No. 12826 of 2009(W) ------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.A.ABRAHAM,KAKKARAVELY HOUSE, VALAMANGALAM SOUTH,THURAVOOR P.O,CHERTHALA. BY ADV. SRI.SABU GEORGE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THURAVOOR GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY,CHERTHALA. 2. SUBAIR IDAPPARAMBIL, SAJI SEAFOODS,KOCHI-16. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.C. NO. 12826 OF 2009 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 28th day of April, 2009. J U D G M E N T The grievance of the petitioner is that the 2nd respondent is conducting a peeling shed very close to the peeling shed belonging to the petitioner in building No.IV/578A. It is his case that the operation of the peeling shed of the 2nd respondent in building No.IV/416 is contrary to the relevant provisions of law and without obtaining requisite licence from the concerned authorities. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has already approached the first respondent with Ext.P6 representation which is liable to be disposed of. 2. Considering the nature of the prayer now confined and the relief proposed to be given, it is not necessary to issue notice to 2nd respondent for the time being. The writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider Ext.P6 representation preferred by the petitioner in W.P.C. NO. 12826 OF 2009 -:2:- accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the 2nd respondent within a period of two months. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. ul/-