IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Crl. Writ Petition No. 336 of 2008 Smt. Sikha Agarwal W/o Sri Manoj Agarwal R/o House No. 901, Sector –31, Gurgaon, P.S. Sector –40. . Petitioner ...………… [ Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand through Secretary (Home) Dehradun, District Dehradun. 2. Station House Officer Police Station Haldwani District Nainital. 3. Smt. Aprna Gupta W/o Sri Vaibhav Gupta D/o Sri D.K. Goel, R/o S –57, Jagdamba Nagar, Haldwani, District Nainital. ...…………. Respondents Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate present for the petitioner. Mr. Tanuj Semwal, Asstt. Government Advocate for the State. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Mr. Tanuj Semwal, learned Asstt. Government Advocate for the State makes a statement that after completion of investigation no offence is said to have been made out against the petitioner Smt. Sikha Agarwal. 2 2) The Investigating Officer has also filed affidavit to this effect stating that charge sheet has been filed against other accused. 3) In view of above development, this writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Dharam Veer, J.) (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 01.07.2008 01.07.2008 H.Negi