IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.18937 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION : OCTOBER 15, 2010 KISHORI LALI VERMA & ORS. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. JS Lalli, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1. This petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed in challenge to orders (Annexures P-1 to P-3) whereby the pay of the petitioners has been revised on the ground that the proficiency step-ups given were wrongly given. Consequently, recovery has already been ordered. 2. Notice of motion. 3. On the asking of the Court, Shri B.S. Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Six copies of the writ petition have been handed over to Shri Chahal. 4. Learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the matter can be considered by the Committee appointed on directions of this Court Civil Writ Petition No.18937 of 2010 2 issued in CWP 18754 of 2007 (Amarjit Singh v. State of Punjab and others), decided on 31.3.2010. 5. Ordered accordingly. 6. The petitioners will be at liberty to approach the Committee, which shall be required to take a decision in terms of order passed by this Court in Amarjit Singh's case (supra). Disposed of in above terms. October 15, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?