WP(C) 2339/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA According to the petitioners, they are entitled to the loan sanc tioned under Kishan Credit Card. It has been stated that the amount for each one of the petitioners is lying with the respondent Bank and the Bank has not relea sed the same. In this connection, Mr. MU Mondal, learned counsel for the petitio ners has referred to Annexure-9 representation dated 15.9.2010 addressed to the Circle Officer, Bagribari Circle, Bagribari. He has also referred to Annexure-5 representation dated 11.4.2010 addressed to the Deputy General Manager, State Ba nk of India, Guwahati, Ulubari. Considering the nature of grievance raised, I deem it appropriat e to dispose of the writ petition without issuing notice to the respondent Bank. I have heard Mr. MU Mondal, learned counsel for the petitioner a s well as Ms. R. Chakraborty, learned State Counsel and so also Mr. ZN Choudhury , learned CGC. The aforementioned two representations dated 11.4.2010 (Annexure -5) addressed to the Deputy General Manager, State Bank of India, Guwahati, Ulub ari and the representation dated 15.9.2010 (Annexure-9) addressed to Circle Offi cer, Bagribari Circle, Bagribari shall be disposed of by the said two authoritie s taking into account all relevant documents and materials. Let the representations be disposed as expeditiously as possible , but at any rate, not later than 31.05.2011. The petitioners are permitted to furnish the certified copy of t his order along with the copy of the writ petition and its enclosures to the sai d authorities.