IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.211 of 2008 SUDHA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the petitioner: Mr.Shakil Ahmad Khan,Sr.Advocate. For the State : Mr.Subhash Prasad Singh, G.A.8. 3 21.1.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is the wife of the deceased , Krishna Singh. Earlier an F.I.R. being Rivilganj P.S. Case No.53/06 was filed by the father of the deceased. After investigation the police submitted charge sheet under section 306 of the I.P.C. The petitioner has filed a complaint being Complaint Case no.1389/06 in which she made allegations against the family members of the deceased husband for causing his death which was directed to be registered as Rivilganj P.S.Case No.79/06 under section 302/34 of the I.P.C. The grievance of the petitioner is that the police did not conduct investigation properly and some of the relevant witnesses have not been examined. As such the Magistrate passed order under section 173(8) of Cr.P.C. The learned State counsel submits that the police after investigation has submitted final form and the petitioner, if aggrieved, could have pursued her protest cum complaint. In the circumstance as in this case there is order of Chief Judicial Magistrate directing for further investigation of 2 Rivilganj P.S.Case No.79/06, the respondents are directed to comply with the aforesaid direction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate. With the aforesaid observation and direction this writ application is dismissed. Anilksinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)