@ c ^^f- IN THE HON'BLE HI6M CQURT OF CHHATTIS6ARM AT BILASPUR f<5.6.) W.P. CS) N0. ^S^e /2010 PETITIONER ft'*. RESPONDENTS : 1. Raghunandcin Prasad sharma, Acjed abdut 59 years, S/o Shri Kai'nal Narayan Tiwari, Upper Division Teacher , &8ver'ni'nent AAiddle Schoot, Kohka, t)istrict-Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS State of Ghhatti^gar'h Thfough Secretary, School Education Department &.K.S. Bhawall, ftaipur (C.©.) 2. TheDirector Public Instructions Raipur(C.(5.) 3. District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon, DiStnct-Rajnandgaon 1. 4. Block Educdtion Officer Dongergabn, District- Rojnandgaon (C.©.) WRIT PETITION ^N^Jt AKtICl.E. 226 OF TME CONSTTTOION ®FtNDlA PARTICULARS OFTHE PETtTIONEIii As'lTientioned in the causetitle. PETITIQNER RESRQNDENTS HT©M,C;QURTfQFeMHAT-I-[SGftRl-l.:BILASPUR •WRIT.PETl3-[©Ni{S)'Nffi2346.@l::;201'0 ^ Raghunan$ian?Pi^sad Sharma Versus : ^ . ^StateSfOMhattisgarH&Otliers Gbwri (Writ PetiIionundetArticle22BpftheConstitutiein'oflntlia). Single Bench :.l-lDn'bte®hrrSatiShK;,Agnihoti"i;J.^ Present:-/ ,,ShriK.S. Pawar.'^dvocate'foM^ :!^ . . . ' SHri P.KiBhaduri,.PahelLawyBff6ffheState.,{ . ORDER (•ORAI-). . . ()::>a5sedorithisl7t'1:dayQf.May;2010) ^ •. 1. • Lgaroed counsel appearihg for the;pefitionersuBmit&thatt^ wa&appeinted initially as ASsistant Teacheron a fixed pay on probation. After completipn 6f his respectiye probdlion period; the pelitjone^ graflted reguilar pa^ scale, Learned counsel further submits:t^ ; issue involve^ in the case is aSto whethgr t ^p^ rggular pay \scafe^w:e.f, Ihe dat&? of inifial appointnient or after completiQnofprObationpeFiotl^ . . 2. Learned^ Courisel for the pairties jQintly submit thaf the issue involved: herein was ccfnsideFed by fh&'MaBhya ffirgdesll^Sfate Ayf'ninistrative -TFibunali.aa&aipuF(^^^^W&^^in®^.No.274^9^^ Yac/uana'56^o Bre.vS.Sfa^6)F:M^&offiera);wheFeinitwas'held thesimilar[y;situated teachers are,entilled to r^gular payscalew.e.^Ahe datedf initial;appoilttment. The rrfaft&r was'takeh up to tfte Supreme ^ CQUrt..The appeal was dismissed by ihe SupremgCburt, upholding the deeision of^tlre. Tribunal to the effeef fhat the TeacMerS/Assistant Teaehers are >entifled to regular pay, scale from cfate :of initial ';appointment., , • :, ; ., ,,•,, ... , ,' :• •• ' .. • • 3. In view of the above submissions made bylearhed coynsel for the' parties, the petjtioner is grantecl Ijbgrty to'makearepFeseritafton to the spondent .aufhorifies, if'so aiclvised, fo ttQtisider tt appropriate order, ©nits pwn^ meritartdjn itspSrsFrecU^^^ , the oryer passed; by e, SAT <n Afecftuft^ sUbsequentlyconfirrnedbytheSupremie,COurtinS(:)ecialLeaye?Petition (Civil)No.6892/83\l3yorderdatei:l3-1-1'994. ' ; 4. Accordingjy, fhe writ petitidn.is ciisposedof. , .^:::^;:'':l:.;^s.^:^^ ,iudge