c .^ ' \0< L^/o s: ^^s^t^. ¥m^.M IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, CHHATTISGARH W.P. fC^No. 33S3 72010 PETITIONER "-•',.••; ^•^s^ ^•^^^ss^"" ^^^^ ....^'ft"°' ^-•"" "Sri Rawatpura Sarkar Institute of Professional Studies (B.Ed. Course)"over Khasara No. 624, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh Represented through: Its Registrar & Shri Authorized Signatory Shri B.K. Shrivastava, aged about 55 years, R/o. Kumhari Chowk, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh VERSUS RESPONDENTS : ^ /-2. National Council for Teachers Education (A statutory body of Government of India) Through: Its Member Secretary, Hans Bhawan, Wing-II, 1 Bahadur Shah Jafar Marg, New Delhi 110002 National Council for Teacher Education (A statutory body of Government of India), Western Regional Committee, Through: The Regional Director, Manas Bhawan, Shyamla Hills, Bhopal (M.P. ) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^^^:^^Si^iS^^S^^:^^ UT- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0,3389 QF 2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Sri Rawatpura Sarkar Institute of Professional Studies (B.Ed. course) Versus National Council for Teachers Education & Another (Writ Petition underArticle 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Rahul Tamaskar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Bhaskar Pyasi, Advocate for the respondents. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on this 2nd day ofAugust, 2010) 1. At the very outset, Shri Tamaskar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that having regard to the fact that the academic session is to begin, the petitioner may be permitted to make af detailed representation to the respondent No.2 for grant of recognition, as the petitioner's institute satisfies with each and every requirement. 2. At this juncture, Shri Pyasi, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, submits that if a fresh application is made by the petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided, in i accordance with law and on its own merits, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, if any. 3. In view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is djsposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Gowri | Judge