IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT:: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CRL.P.No.2519 OF 2009 Between:: Hussain Bin Shahbal …Petitioner A n d M.Ashok Reddy and another …Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CRL.P.No.2519 OF 2009 ORDER: This criminal petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing further proceedings against the petitioner/accused in Cr.No.76 of 2009 of Chintapalli Police Station, Nalgonda District. 2. Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent/State. Request for adjournment made on behalf of the petitioner is refused. None appears for the 1st respondent/de facto complainant. Perused the record. 3. On a complaint given by the 1st respondent, who was working as Head Constable of Chintapalli Police Station, a case inCr.No.76 of 2009 was registered against the petitioner/accused. In the complaint, it is alleged by the 1st respondent that on 04.04.2009 at 04.30 P.M., while he was on duty in connection with the arrangements for elections and in the course of such duty, he was checking the vehicles at Chintapalli crossroad near Saibaba temple and that an Innova car bearing No.AP 11 AE 1891 came on that way and the said vehicle was stopped and checked and it was found that the petitioner/accused who was driving the car and who was sole occupant was carrying cash of Rs.2 lakhs in the denomination of Rs.500/- and on questioning, he stated that he was carrying the cash from Hyderabad to Halia on the eve of election and the same was not accounted for. 4. Having regard to the gravity of the nature of offences alleged and also the fact that cash of Rs.2 lakhs was seized from the petitioner /accused, and that the same was not accounted for by him, the matter requires due investigation and necessary follow up action. It is, therefore, considered not a fit case to invoke the inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C and quash further proceedings against the petitioner/accused. 5. In the result, the criminal petition is dismissed. Interim stay granted earlier by this Court stands vacated. __________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY 29th September, 2011 Lrkm