27 T V Noe5755 Ili IN TIIK IllGll COURT VOR THE STAlES 0F PlJNeIAll HARYANA AT CHANDIGARII eee Civil RelrisionNoe5755of 2009 08Vll Decidcd 011 1 Oclohcr 15 2009 m Kallatcr Singh 0 PctitiollCl 00 0 VERSUS X r25 Aniarjeet Kaur X Rcspondcnl Z ORAM I ION135 MRJUSTICIEAlVINDAL L PrCSCIll lVlrAthant Jain Advocatcfcltllle pctitioncr ctj MrSSodlli Advocatcfor thcrcspoildcnl r AIJINDAI J Wm3 This rCvisioIl pctitionIS directedagainstlhc ordcr dotcd 0 299 2009 passcdl Additional Civil Judgc1SrOivll1 Malcrkolla thcapplicatitlll 17 waiviilg the statutcociiod 01 SlX Illonlhs as ProvidcdunderScctln 1343 of theHindu Marriagc Act 1955 hcrcin 171rshclrttheActI Ior grailting divorccbyway of mutualconscnt Adm iltcd IaclS arc lhal lllC marnagcbclwccn thc parlicsIlIS solcmiliscdOil 137 982 Icctrding 13 Sikh ritcs Out ofthc wcdlock 01 lIlc lUlrtlCSlWO childrcil ntlnlclySukhwindcrSinghand SantokhSinghwcrc 4 horil Ilc palllCSIivcd togclhcias husbaildand wifc tlII 1997 I lowcvcr dttelo tlillercnccs theycould ilOt llVC togcthcrlllcrctiller and dcspitcthc best elltlrts thc nlarrtagcCotlld not survivc hc PclllltlllCl Singh Gagan Preet 2012.12.20 17: 59 True Scanned Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 28 V ivil RerisionNo755 of200M1 1 Icftthc socielyof thc in Jatluary1997willl ail iiltcillitlil tltll lCl Jtllil thcconjugal tic forcver It is averrcdin lhe divorcc petition 011124921119 SlllCC lhc inarrliigc hasirrelvablybrokcn lhcreItc tllcyIlavc dccitletl tt 11rcaklllc byIvay of nlutual conscnt AlongIvithlhc pctlllOIl 1111 C for waiviilglhc slalutoryperiodof SlX Illtllltlls aS 0 lltldcr Scclion oflhc Act was also inovcd which was dcclincd C 1Icard Admiltcdly the was solcilllliscdclil 137 1182 aild tllc livcd togcthcruploJanuaty1997 1Ilcicllllci tllc jocliliIilcl X IiClll abroad and duc lo of 11111lClllllCOlllCillS Z bctlvecil thein thc Wentto rollghwcalllcr 1lc dcscrtitlll0f 12IctirsbClIVCCIl tllClll CClilVillCed lllcm to thinklhatlllcyillllClt bc ablclO I rCSlIIlIC thcconjugal tic ll is also admittcdfacl thata1i1cr1997 thcrc IvaS 110 08 coltlbitalioil bctwccn tllc partiesCopyOf tllc Oll 7 rccord clearlycstablishcs that thcyhave mutually dccidctl lo Ieavc ciicll Il Now thc for considcraliclnis lhtit ilIlelllcr tllc pciitld 01 siX IllOllthslIS proviclcd undcr Scction 13132101 lllc Act l1r gralllitl8 divOrCCClill bc waivedof In lhisregard a Division 13cnchof thisCourl iil casc Krishna Khetarpal VS Satish 1al AIR 1987 Pltnjtihc0 4 l 91 0bscrvedtllat if the circumstailccs warrant thc MatrinlonialCourl Ctlll dissolvctIIc bya dccrcc of divorcc hctwccntllc lllo l lindusOll thc basis 0 cntcrcd into bctwecn hc ptirlics duriilglllc of lhc divorccpctillOJlwithoutstrictlyfollowingthe Ioroccdtirc prescrlbcdbyScction of thc Act but on satisfyillgilsclf 1tlli Singh Gagan Preet 2012.12.20 17: 59 True Scanned Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 29 V Ciril Revision Noe5755of200908iM1 11I the of Scclion23 1Kcl of thc Act but tilsll 411tllcsllccillciilly Scction23 116bbl ofthc Act Thc ratill 01llle judgillelll 1S duriilgtllc of a pclitioiltllc lciilld 11six illIiltlls Cilll he waivcdifthcre arc 110CIlallCCS Of lhClr rCSllllllllg IICS111 anystagcin Jiiturc Scction23Il6bblanccl oflloc Acl rcadas under 23 Decree 6ll ln any undcr llIis 0 Acl whcthcr defcndcdor nol lfthc Courl is salisOcdlhale C 6lobl whcn l divorCClS Souglll Oll lhc groulldtllIllulualCClllSClll such consclll has Ilot becn obtaincdby IIrcc Ilaud or uildue X influenccand Z cl thc l ilol beinga prcscntcd undcr Scclioil Ill lS IlOt or in coIlusion wilh thc 99 olj 7 NtlwConllllg lothc lactsoflhc prcsctltcase lllc parlICStIIOIllCar to hal c scltlcd lor scckinglhedivorceof lhcir OWll frccdcsirc andconscnt Iliilllcllil ally Ulldlic prcsSUreOr COerClOll froill aIly StlUrCC hcir Itlll dcscrloiohas broughllhelll lo this stagc whcil lhcrc IS 110 Sllutlliclll 011 chailcc 01joining hands In lhe 01lhe Iaw rcfcrrcd lo tibtllc Il Iiould be iil lhc fltllCSSOf thingsif thc statutory tlf SlX IllOlllhSIS wilh hc rcliancc if any could alsobc placcd 011 the udglllCill dclivcrcdbythc ApcxCourt 111caSC Aniana Kishore VSe Ptincel Kishllre SCC 194 whcrcin il was observcdthal It WaSOllCil tcllIlC U Courl l dispcnsc with thc necdof six inonths which is othcrwisc rcquircd b sullscctioil 2101 Scclion 1313 of lhc Acl Ihc elcviilll 40 4 Singh Gagan Preet 2012.12.20 17: 59 True Scanned Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 40 30 2 Civii Revisitln No755 of2009MA i madcloylhcir Iordships arc as undcr Ill Vicw of thc wllicll havcttlkeilpliiccdlirillg lhc of procecdi ngs Iil lhis C0urt IVC clccline lO Illlllsfcrthecasc frointhc Iaill ilyCcllirl al Iltiildrti M uillbaiIll thc Courl at Wc hotvelLi diicct llltil iIS l tIgrccd to by IcarnOdcouilscl or lllc parlicsii joiill pctilitIil 0 shallbc Illcd bylhe partics beforethc l7amily Court tll 13ailtlia 0 I Mumbai for grant of divorcc by mutual CllllSClll 1CrlllSClf 45 COlllPrOlllISCaS filed bcforc us shall ilso IicccIillpanylhc joint pctitiotlAn for curtailincnt 01 11111C for granl of Z divorcc shall also bc Olcdalongwilh tllc Iint pctilionOll lr such application bcillg rnovcd lhc 1amilyCollr Illl I witoh thc nccd of wailiilgfor SlX Illtllltlls whicl IS oll rcquircd othcrwiscbysubsection 21of Scction 1343 01 thc m 1Iindu Marriagc Act 1955 pass Ilnal 0rder cIil tllc Z 5 within such tiinc as it may dccin Ill his dircctloll WC ilrC 0a making undcrArticlc 14201thc tls lol1iilgal tIlC IiiCtSaild ClrcUmstailccs oftllc casc cincrgillg Ironl of tllc parlicsand discloscdduringthe Coursc of hcarllll WC tIrC 1 stitisficd01thc necd of Inaking Stlcll tI dircClItlill1 dtl e Jlisliccin thc case The particsshallprcscilltllcillSellCSbcIorc lhc IcarncdPicsiding Ofllccr IamilyCoutl tit Muinboi Oll 1782001 whcil thc Icarncd Prcsiding OJfllccr shall take lurtllcr stcps 11 hus tIlcre lS Ilo tota 0f doubt in lny Illtnd lhal ill a Iil and propcr cttse Singh Gagan Preet 2012.12.20 17: 59 True Scanned Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document no 31 7 V JnNo547009l0Wl ivil ReIsion l1 whcn lhc marriagcIS brokcn atld thc jliiriics arc Iivill Ior tllc Iast 12 vcars andthcrcarc ilO chanccsof rcconcilialiclll lllcslatiiltlrypcriodol six mollthsnccdbc waild ol It gtiiill lllc rcvisioil is ilild lhe llrllct datcd2992009 is sct asidcandthe1rial Court is dircclcd tcI Ivailc t1ftllc 1 slalutoopcriod0 six nlonths so as to Cilablc tllc Ililrllcs t1 sctllr 0 C 0 5 Oclobcr 15 2009 AllJJINDAI J X JlJDGl 4 1511111 Z 1 I olj W Z tl 1 1 C1 Singh Gagan Preet 2012.12.20 17: 59 True Scanned Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document