@ HEGH COURT OF CHHAT‘HSGARH AT BELASPUR DWE$§€3N BENCH QQRAM: HQWBLE $HRI RAJEEV GUPTAa CJ. HONgBLE SRRE SGNEL KUMAR SlNHAg J. W.P,. {Q Na. 14$3 af 2%@? Petétmnef : Mls Sriniva5a Fem) Alioys PW. Lid. A company registered under the Campanies Act, 1956 —« Havmg its fegistered eff§ce ai MIG 225, Seethammadhaya (NE) Vi$hakapamam 530—013 (AR) Through its Resident D§rec€0r, Vamswarma P., S/o P.S.R. Raiu, agaj about 25 years, Rm Near Poiice Comm! Roam, Cévil Lines, Raipur (GEL) kgagwg RE3P§NQ§NT$ 1 , The state 0f Chhaitisgai’h —— Thmugh the Department of Power and Elecmcity, Mantraiaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur {c.G.) Ths Chhat‘tisgarh state Eiectrisi’zy Beam — Thrsugh ii$ Chairman, Daganiya, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Chhatiisgarh State EéectricEty Bcam‘ — Thmugh its Chief Engineer (RR), Raipur (09.3 4. The Chhattisgarh State Eieciricity Reguia‘mry Cemmission — Thmugh ite Chairman, Civii Lines-3, Raipur (0.6.) Wiii i3ei'iiian wide? Ar‘iicie 22$ a? the camtiiuiimn 0? imie Preeem: -$hri PDiwakar. Seamed Seniar Advacate with Shri Ashish Susana, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shit MK. Agrawai, teamed Deputy Advocate Generai fot the State l respondent No.1. i J f J @ Shri Prashant Mishra, {earned Senior Advocate with Shri Shashank Thakur, ieamed counsel far r respondents No. 2 and 3. None for respondent No.4. 9R3ER (29m March, 20:38) The fouowing order of the Coufi was passed by Rajeev Gama; CNL Sm Ashish Surana, Earned counse! for the petitioner, in View of the deveaopmems during the pendency of the wrii petiiien, )3 seeks permission to withdraw the writ petiiion with the iiberty of fiiing arioéher writ petition, if the future deveiopmente eo warrant. 2); EDermiesion granted. 3} Wii‘n the above iiberiy, the writ petition is dismissed ae withdrawn. 4) Consequentiy, M.(W.)P.No.g45/200? atso stands dismissed as wtthdrawn. i i Sd/- Sd/- ’ Sunil Kumar Sinha Chief Justice. i Judge subbu ‘ i