1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 2972 OF 2009 Kazi Mujibur Raheman S/o Md. Abdul Raheman Versus State of Maharashtra and another *** Mrs. S. S. Jadhav, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. K. M. Suryawanshi, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. *** CORAM: K. U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED: 9th SEPTEMBER, 2009. 1. Heard learned counsel extensively. He is a Director in the bank. The counsel informs that there was disbursement of loan being recommended by the accused/ applicant as Director, the accused will ensure its recovery and also informs that some of the amounts are cleared or are in the process of clearance. Though the role is allegedly shown to be minimal, however, the accused applicant, without following the system, has also coordinated for unworthy assistance of his brother Azizur Raheman in misappropriation of different funds of the bank. 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. The brother of the accused/ applicant could not be traced by the police though they were attempting. Same is the position with the accused. He did not coordinate with the auditor to explain his role. In the situation, pre-arrest bail application rejected. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:09/09/2009. ans/2972