IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD SEPTEMBER 2008 / 12TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 26679 of 2008(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- P.R.PEETHAMBARAN, S/O.RAGHAVAN, AGED 51 YEARS, PRATHEESH BHAVAN, PUDINJAREKKARA.P.O, UDAYANAPURAM, VAIKOM. BY ADV. SRI.K.JAJU BABU SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI SRI.BRIJESH MOHAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE GEOLOGIST, DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, DISTRICT OFFICE, KOTTAYAM. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTTAYAM. 4. SRI.SANTHOSH, KRIPADATH HOUSE, PARITHYMUDI, UDAYANAPURAM, VAIKOM. 5. SRI.M.SURENDRAN, EERATHA HOUSE, PARITHYMUDI, UDAYANAPURAM, VAIKOM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. I.V. PRAMOD. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.26679 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of September, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner's grievance in this writ petition is that on account of the action of respondents 4 and 5 in removing sand from the adjacent property of the petitioner in violation of the permit conditions, the petitioner's property is seriously affected. In this respect, the petitioner has submitted Ext.P2 complaint before the 2nd respondent. The petitioner seeks a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2 expeditiously. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as W.P.(c)No.26679/08 2 respondents 4 and 5. If it is found that respondents 4 and 5 have violated the permit conditions or the relevant provisions of law, the 2nd respondent shall take appropriate follow up action also. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd