1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.906/2006 (Manjula Choudhary Vs. R.P.S.C. & Ors.) Date of Order :: 20.05.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr.Pradeep Choudhary, for the petitioner. Mr.Deepak Choudhary, Dy. Govt. Counsel. Mr.J.P. Joshi, for RPSC. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In this case, the petitioner is claiming age relaxation for OBC (Woman) candidates in the Rajasthan Judicial Services. More specifically, petitioner has prayed that respondents may kindly be directed to grant age relaxation for appointment in pursuance of the advertisement dated 19th November, 2005. The petitioner is claiming age relaxation on the ground that in other service rules, State Government has provided age relaxation to the OBC (Woman) candidates whereas in judicial services no age relaxation has been provided for the OBC (Woman) candidates, therefore, their action is in violation of the Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Learned counsel for RPSC vehemently argued that as per advertisement itself, it was made clear that there is no provision in the Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules, 1955 to grant age relaxation to the OBC (Woman) candidates, therefore, there is no question for granting any age relaxation to the petitioner who is in OBC (Woman) category. In my opinion, there is force in the arguments advanced by learned counsel for RPSC because admittedly there 2 is no expressed provision in the Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules, 1955 for providing age relaxation to the OBC (Woman) candidates, therefore, claim of the petitioner is totally unfounded. In this view of the matter, there is no ground to interfere in this writ petition. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. However, for grant of age relaxation in future vacancies, petitioner is at liberty to file representation to the State Government. No order as to costs. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS),J. A.K. Chouhan/-