HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY Civil Revision Petition Nos.4994 and 6009 of 2010 Date: April 27, 2011 C.R.P.No.4994 of 2010 Between: M/s.Pinakini Sheep Farms (P) Ltd., represented by its Managing Director Ch.Ajay Ghosh, S/o.late Sarabhaiah, aged 58 years, 3-997-1, Settigunta Road, Stonehousepet, Nellore-2, SPSR Nellore District … Petitioner And Cheedella Venkateswarlu, S/o.Subbaramaiah, aged about 58 years, R/o.Lakshmi Sai Nagar, Nawabpet, Nellore-2 and others … Respondents C.R.P.No.6009 of 2010 Between: Cheedella Venkateswarlu, S/o.Subbaramaiah, R/o.Lakshmi Sai Nagar, Nawabpet, Nellore … Petitioner And Pinakini Sheep Farms Pvt.Ltd. Company, represented by its Managing Director Ch.Ajay Ghosh, S/o.Sarabaiah, Occ: Business, R/o.Indukurpet village and Mandal, Sri Potti Sri Ramulu Nellore District … Respondents Common Order: As much as these civil revision petitions arise out of interlocutory applications filed in A.S.No.12 of 2009 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Gudur, SPSR Nellore District, they are heard together and disposed of by this common order. C.R.P.No.6009 of 2010 is filed by the petitioner, who is the appellant in the first appeal in A.S.No.12 of 2009, aggrieved by the order dated 26-11-2010 passed in un- numbered C.F.No.4322 of 2010. The petitioner in this revision is the defendant in the suit filed by the first respondent herein for injunction simplicitor in O.S.No.443 of 2000, which is dismissed by the learned Junior Civil Judge, Gudur. While dismissing the suit, certain directions were issued directing the Advocate-receiver appointed in I.A.No.1053 of 2000 to continue to auction the leasehold rights of the suit schedule property on annual basis and to deposit the lease amount into the Court. As against that portion of the order, the petitioner carried the matter in appeal, which was numbered as A.S.No.7 of 2009 before the learned Senior Civil Judge, Gudur, which was subsequently transferred to the learned Senior Civil Judge, Kovvur and re-numbered as A.S.No.12 of 2009. In the said appeal, the first respondent herein filed I.A.No.23 of 2010 to receive certain additional documents, which was allowed on 16-06-2010 as against which C.R.P.No.2673 of 2010 was filed. In the said C.R.P., interim order was passed in C.M.P.No.3583 of 2001 to maintain status quo as on the date of passing of the order. The petitioner herein, who is the appellant in the first appeal, filed C.F.No.4322 of 2010 to stay all further proceedings pursuant to lease dated 10-10-2010 executed by the receiver. It is his case in the said application that findings recorded by the trial Court on issue No.6 are already stayed by the first appellate Court; in spite of the same receiver has proceeded to grant lease and executed lease illegally on 10-10-2010. On the said application, impugned order is passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Kovvur by recording a finding that in view of the status quo order passed by this Court in C.R.P.No.2673 of 2010, the present application filed in C.F.No.4322 of 2010 cannot be entertained. The petitioner in C.R.P.No.4994 of 2010 is the respondent in A.S.No.12 of 2009. In the said first appeal, the petitioner in the said C.R.P., filed C.F.No.2250 of 2010 to permit him to harvest the standing crop in the suit schedule property in O.S.No.443 of 2000 and allow him to sell the same. The said application is also rejected as not maintainable in view of the order passed by this Court in C.R.P.No.2673 of 2010. When these revisions are taken up for consideration, it is submitted that impugned orders in the present revision petitions are filed only basing on the interim order passed in C.R.P.No.2673 of 2010, which is already dismissed by this Court. As much as the revision in C.R.P.No.2673 of 2010 is already disposed of, now, the lower appellate Court can consider the interlocutory applications on merits and pass appropriate orders. In the circumstances, impugned orders in both the revision petitions are set-aside and the matter is remitted back for fresh consideration by lower appellate Court. Accordingly, order dated 26-11-2010 passed in C.F.No.4322 of 2010 which is impugned in C.R.P.No.6009 of 2010 and the order dated 03-08-2010 passed in C.F.No.2250 of 2010, which is impugned in C.R.P.No.4994 of 2010 are set-aside, with a direction to the learned Senior Civil Judge, Kovvur to consider the said interlocutory applications on merits and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible preferably within two months from today. Civil revision petitions are allowed to the extent indicated above. No order as to costs. __________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J April 27, 2011 MRR