IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5904 of 2008 SUBANSH DAS, son of late Anant Das, resident of village-Choupta, P.S.- Jhanjharpur(Bhairavasthan)District-Madhubani. ……..Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Ramdeo Mukhiya, son of Late Kusheshwar Mukhiya, village- Jhoua(Kako), P.S.-Bhairav Asthan, District-Madhubani. ……..Opposite Parties. ----------- 03. 19.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. In spite of notices being issued to O.P. No. 2 vide order dated 26.03.2009, no one is appearing even today on behalf of the O.P. No. 2. The office report dated 26.06.2009 suggests that the O.P. No. 2 has received notices. The present application has been filed for quashing of the First Information Report of Jhanjharpur(Bhairav Asthan) P.S. Case No. 34 of 2007 registered under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. It is very fairly submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the investigation is already complete and the charge sheet has been submitted. In that view of the matter, the application has become infructuous. However, learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn my attention to Annexure-3 which is a compromise petition filed in anticipatory bail application. It is submitted 2 by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the dispute has been settled outside the Court between the parties. If the dispute has been settled outside the Court then the appropriate application should be filed before the Trial Court and the Trial Court shall consider the same in accordance with law. The application is dismissed as having become infructuous. Shageer (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)