IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16789 of 2010 Ajay Kumar Sinha Versus State Of Bihar & Anr ----------- 6 06.09.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner does not appear. In pursuance of order dated 12.1.2011 notice was issued against Opposite Party No.2. The execution report shows that the notice was received by the son of O.P. No.2. In the aforesaid execution report nowhere it is mentioned that Opposite Party No.2 is dead. However, the son of Opposite Party No.2 appeared through Vakalatnama wherein he had mentioned his father’s name (late) along with address and that happens to be reason behind that the office had reported on 25.4.2011 that there should be substitution for which petitioner should take proper steps by filing interlocutory application. So many dates have passed granting adjournment to the petitioner on this very pretext but in vain. As such, the conduct of the petitioner shows that he is more interested to linger the mater than to comply the order of the court. Taking into consideration the negligent attitude of the petitioner, instant petition is dismissed. PN (Aditya Kumar Trivedi,J.)