HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. ‘BILASPUR @9 Writ PetitionIC) 1539 of 2011 1 Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti PETITIONERS Maryadit, Tendukona, Registration No. 1127 District Mahasamund (C.G.), through: Its President Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, Tendukona, Registration No. 1127, District Mahasamund (C.G.) Muran'lal Sahu, S/o Sadaram Sahu, aged about 58 years, President, Gramin Sewa ‘ Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, Tendukona, Registration No. 1127, District Mahasamund (C.G.) Versus 1 State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Co-operative, Department, D'.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Chhattisgarh, District Raipur (C.G.) Vijay Kumar Agrawai, S/o Babulal Agrawal, aged about 35 years, Ex—President, Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, Tendukona, District Mahasamund (C.G.) Menka Sahu, W/o Dr. Mayaram Sahu, aged about 41 years, Ex President, Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, Tendukona, District Mahasamund (C.G.) Ramashankar Sharma, S/o Tamsingh Sharma, aged about 65 years, Ex— President, Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, Tendukona, District Mahasamund (C.G.) Rikhiram Sahu, S/o Not Known to the applicants, aged about 68 years, Sanchalak Sadasya, Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, RS ESPONDENT 2 W.P.(C) No. 1539 of 2011 Tendukona, Registration No. 1127, District Mahasamund (C.G.) Ramratan Sahu, S/o Not known to the applicants, aged about 55 years, Sanchalak Sadasya, Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, Tendukona, Registration No. 1127, District Mahasamund (C.G.) Smt. Gendi Bai, W/o Not known to the applicants, aged about 38 years, Sanchalak Sadasya, Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, Tendukona, Registration No. 1127, District Mahasamund L (C.G.) Bhagwani Sahu, S/o Not known to the applicants, aged about 62 years, Sanchalak Sadasya, Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, Tendukona, Registration No. 1127, District Mahasamund (C.G.) 10 Pileshwar Patel, S/o Not known to the applicants, aged about 28 years, Sanchalak Sadasya, Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, Tendukona, Registration No. 1127, District Mahasamund (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION (it: OF INDIA Appearance: Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondents 1 85 2 on advance copy. g ORAL ORDER (22.03.2011) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard on admission. Mr. Awadh Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the first order dated 14.6.2010 was passed by Dy. Registrar. Thereafter a iirst appeal was filed and the appellate 3 W.P.(C) No. 1539 of 2011 order dated 8.2.2011 was passed by the Joint Registrar. His submission is that after rejection of the first appeal, the remedy of second appeal was available, but the revision was filed before the State Government and the State Government entertained the revision and has also passed interim order dated 1.3.2011. His submission is that the State Government has no jurisdiction to entertain a revision because the remedy of the second appeal was available to the party. Mr. Shashank Thakur, learned Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondents 1 8a 2, raises preliminary objection that the question of jurisdiction of quasi judicial authority should firstly be raised before the said authority and a writ petition should not be entertained. In view of the above preliminary objection raised by counsel for the State, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file an objection before the State Government regarding maintainability of the revisions petition in View of the provision of the second appeal contained in Co—operative Society Act, 1960 and with further liberty to come to High Court if such an exigency arises in future. n é? Permission granted. Accordingly the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioner. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the question of maintainability of the revision shall be decided by the revisional authority in light of the provisions of Sections 77 85 78 of the Co- operative Society Act, 1960. Sd/- SUNEKUMARSNHA Judge