't i-iT)!W'- jy. HIOHCOURTOF CHHATnSGARH :BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Sl N0.5454 OF 2008 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Smt Santoshi Choudha(y, W/o Shri Rupendra Clwudhary, aged about 24 yeare, Caste Chamar, R/o village & post Ashna, Tehsil Jagdaljpur.DisbictBastar (CG). Versus 1. State <rf Chhattisgarti, through ttie Secretary, Govemmant of General AdmlnishaUon, D.K.S. Bulkling, Ministty, Raipur (CG). 2. The Collector, Jagdalpur, Distnct Bastar (CG). 3. The Chief Executive Officer, District Panchayat, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (CG). 4. The Tehsildar, Jagdalpur, Dfetrid Etastar (CG). Ofl/rit p^ition under Arfete 226 ofthe Constitytion oflndia) Single Bench: Hon'WelShriSafishK.Agnjhotri.J. Present:- Shri Atok Dewangan, counsel for ttie peUUoner. Shri Pantaj Shrivastara, Pan^ Lawyer for the State. ORDER (Passed on this 10" day of February, 2009) The pefitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on tte part of Tahsildar, Jagdalpur by wrtiich he has refused to grant permanent domicile cerUficate in favour oftte petitioner, 2) Leamed counsel appearing for the petiUoner submits that the petjtfoner was granted temporary domk;ne certificate on 11-1-2008 (Annexure-P/6) by the Tahsitdar, Jagdalpur, on the ground that the petitioner has been reskling at tehna, Tehsil Jagdalpur, District Bastar for the last two months. Thereafter on 28-8-20M, temporary domicile certificate was again issued mentioning tfiat the petitioner is still residini at Ashna fbr one year. Leamed counsel further produced a cerfif|(^;e dated 17-7-2003 (Annexure-PQ), which is a domicito certiffeate, issued by the Tahsildar in favour crfthe husband ofthe petitioner namely, Ru(»ndra,S/o Bhaiyalal. Gowri 3) Ifthe husband has been granted permanentdQmicjlecwtififiate, his wife (petidoner herein) is entMed to permanent domiclte eertificate, because after the marriage the twfeis required to stay along wUh her hMSband, who appeare to be the reskteit <rf ^hna. TehsUJ.agttalRur. CSsbN.Ba^r. on ttie basisofcertificate dated 17-7-2003 (Annexure-P/2). 4) In view of the foregoing. the respondent aythorities are direirted to consider and deckto the application of ttie petiBoner for issuance of permanent domicile certifteate, in awordance with law, wittiin a P8riod of four weelcs from the date of receipt <rf a copy of (his order. 5) Interim order passed eariier to confinue till the case ofthe peUdoner isdecidedbytherespondentauftortties. _- Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge jy.