IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 26TH FEBRUARY 2007 / 7TH PHALGUNA 1928 RP.No. 185 of 2007(B) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WA.1863/2006 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/APPELLANT ---------------------------- P.P.GOPALAN, P.P.HOUSE, P.O.MOTTAMMAL, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.A.SUDHI VASUDEVAN RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS ------------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, R.T.A., KANNUR. 3. THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI BENNY GERVACIS THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN & ANTONY DOMINIC, JJ. ---------------------------------------- R.P.NO.185 OF 2007 IN W.A.NO.1863 OF 2006 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of February, 2007 O R D E R Raman,J. This is a petition seeking review of the judgment in W.A.No.1863/2006. W.P.(C). No.3619/2006 was filed challenging the order passed by the Regional Transport Authority and confirmed by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal. Petitioner herein was having a regular permit on the route Thekkumbad-Kannur- Payyannur. He applied for a variation of that permit by adding one additional trip between Kannur and Payyannur and also sought conversion of the permit as Limited Stop Ordinary Service. The authorities below found that the conversion sought for, if allowed, will affect the students and the travelling public from the ill-served sector. The learned -2- R.P.NO.185/2007 Single Judge, after considering the materials on record, came to the conclusion that the order passed by the authorities below is correct and no interference is called for, against which W.A.No.1863/2006 was filed. That writ appeal was dismissed on the finding that there is no scope for interference on the question of fact. 2. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader and perused the connected records. We find no sufficient ground for reviewing the judgment in the writ appeal. Review Petition is dismissed. P.R.RAMAN, Judge. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge. kcv.