IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3425 of 2009 PROF.SURENDRA KUMAR SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 23.3.2009 Heard counsel for the parties. In the opinion of this Court the petitioner having already approached the office of the Chancellor for settlement of his retirement dues in all fairness ought to have waited for compliance of the directions given in the letter of the Chancellor dated 6.6.2008, as contained in Annexure 3. This Court, however, taking into account that the petitioner has retired on 31.1.1996 and has certain grievance with regard to payment of retirement benefit, would leave the matter to be adjudicated by the University only in respect of payment of admitted retirement benefit including the provident fund. Any such amount which is still to be decided by way of entitlement of the petitioner such as salary and allowances etc. would not be admitted dues and therefore, as the petitioner’s grievance in his representation, Annexure 1, was confined to provident fund on contribution and deposit of amount of deferred D.A. in such 2 provident fund amount, the University should decide the entitlement of the petitioner in respect of payment of provident fund and/or any other admitted retirement dues. The petitioner’s admitted retirement benefits must be adjudicated and paid to him within a period of three months from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order. This application, accordingly, stands disposed of. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/