S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1362/2009 Siya Ram Sharma Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. Date of order : 09.02.2009 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PREM SHANKER ASOPA Mr. C.P.Sharma for petitioner. Mr. Hemant Mathur Dy.Govt. Counsel for State. Heard counsel for the parties. Counsel for the petitioner submits that his case is squarely covered by the judgment of this of this Court dated 07.01.2009 in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 5951/2008 titled as Smt. Priti Dixit Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. The relevant paragraph 20,21 & 22 of the aforesaid judgment is as follows :- “20. Many of the writ petitions have been preferred by the petitioners on the ground they have gained the requisite experience but the experience certificate given by the school concerned has not been countersigned by the concerned District Education Officer and in absence of the counter signature, their candidature has not been considered for appointment on the post of Prabhodhak. 21. In this regard, this Court deem it proper to direct the respondents to verify the experience certificate submitted by the petitioners from the record of the concerned school and if it is found correct, then the same may be countersigned by the concerned District Education Officer. However, it is made clear that the experience certificate which have been issued by the recognized educational institution or project, can only be considered. 22. In few of the cases, the District Education Officer has countersigned the experience certificate but later on the same has been withdrawn. In such cases also, the respondents are directed to verify the experience of the particular petitioner from the record of the school and if it is found correct, then the same be considered for appointment on the post of Prabhodhak even the counter signature has been withdrawn by the District Education Officer.” Counsel for the respondents has also not disputed the aforesaid judgment. I have considered the aforesaid aspect of the matter and in my view there is a letter of confirmation by the Principal on record and further mention of the fact that in the school record, there is also a teaching experience certificate of the petitioner w.e.f. 1.07.2002 to 06.06.2008. Therefore, the respondents shall verify the aforesaid facts as per paragraphs Nos. 20,21 and 22 of the aforesaid judgment and thereafter the respondents shall act according to law. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the aforesaid paragraphs of the judgment. (PREM SHANKER ASOPA),J. Gandhi 1