IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH JULY 2007 / 13TH ASHADHA 1929 WA.No. 1114 of 2001(B) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.576/2001 Dated 15/02/2001 .................... APPELLANT:PETITIONER --------------------------------- K.G.MOHANAN PILLAI, DY.DIRECTOR, WILD LIFE EDUCATION, (IN-CHARGE OF DIRECTOR), FORESTRY INFORMATION BUREAU, VAZHUTHAKAD, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.P.RAVINDRAN RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS ----------------------------------------- 1. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS ADDITIONAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FOREST AND WILD LIFE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST KERALA FOREST HEAD QUARTERS VAZHUTHAKAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADDL.3RD RESPONDENT --------------------------------- 3. K.VIJAYAKUMAR (ASST.CONSERVATOR OF FOREST), 92a, CSM NAGAR, SASTHAMANGALAM P,O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 10. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SANDESH RAJA SRI.K.L.NARASIMHAN FOR ADDL.R3 THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/07/2007, ALONG WITH WA NO. 1128 OF 2001 , THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WA NO.1114/2001 ORDER IN CMP NO.2531 OF 2001 IN WA NO.1114 OF 2001 DISMISSED 04/07/2007 SD/-K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. SD/-ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. //TRUE COPY// K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANTONY DOMINIC, JJ. =============================== W.A. NOs. 1114 & 1128 OF 2001 ====================== Dated this the 4th day of July, 2007 J U D G M E N T Radhakrishnan, J. In view of the subsequent order passed by the Government in G.O(Rt)No.17/07 dated 10.1.2007 dropping disciplinary proceedings against the appellant in WA No.1114/2001, no further orders are necessary. 2. Counsel for the appellant submitted that the period of suspension has to be regularized since the Government has already dropped the disciplinary proceedings. Counsel also submitted that full DCRG is not released by the authorities. The authorities shall take note of the above aspects and take appropriate follow up action. This must be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. With the above observation, both the writ appeals are disposed of. K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Rp