IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 31ST JANUARY 2011 / 11TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 1298 of 2011(J) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- DR.VILASINI C.P, GUEST LECTURER DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY, SREE SANARACHARYA UNIVERSITY OF SANSKRIT REGIONAL CENTRE, KOYILANDY PO,NADUVATHUR. BY ADV. SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. SREE SANKARACHARYA UNIVERSITY OF SANSKRIT, REP BY ITS REGISTRAR, P.O.KALADY ERNAKULAM PIN 683 574. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR SREE SANKARACHARYA UNIVERSITY OF SANSKRIT, P.O.KALADY ERNAKULAM PIN 683 574. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.VIJAYAMOHANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: VK T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.1298/2011-J ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 31st day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner, a Lecturer in the Department of Philosophy, is seeking for regularisation in the same post for which she has approached the University by filing Ext.P3 representation. According to the petitioner, she was appointed on contract basis in the year 1995 and, thereafter, she has been continuing till 29/02/1996. She was appointed in a regular post with effect from 01/03/1996 after a due process of selection. The said selection and appointment of the petitioner and other teachers were challenged before this Court and as ordered by this Court, the appointment of the petitioner and others were cancelled. Thereafter, the petitioner was again appointed as Lecturer on contract basis on 13/06/1997 and has been continuing as such. It is pointed out that a similarly placed person was regularised in service as per the directions in Ext.P2 Judgment, and her case may also be considered accordingly. She has submitted Ext.P3 representation in the matter. W.P.(C). No.1298/2011 -:2:- 2. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the University. It is upto the second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 representation in accordance with law. The same will be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the respondents may consider the same in the light of the findings in Ext.P2 Judgment also. The same also will be done. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms \\TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE