WPSS 1192 of 2007 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri Anil Dabral, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri H.M. Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand on behalf of respondent nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 and Sri Gopal Narian for respondent no. 5. Learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the controversy raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered and has already been settled by Hon’ble Single Judge of this Court vide judgment and order dated 27.02.2006 in Writ Petition No. 223 (S/S) of 2006 (Sunil Kumar Vs. State of Uttaranchal & Ors.), and consequently, the present writ petition may also be disposed of on the same terms and observations made in the aforesaid judgment. In view of the above statement made at bar, the writ petition is disposed on of the same terms and observations made in Writ Petition No. 223 (S/S) of 2006 (Sunil Kumar Vs. State of Uttaranchal & Ors.). All the pending applications stand disposed of. (M.M.G., J.) 30.08.2007 VKS