IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SA No.40 of 2005 1. RAM LAKHAN PD.GUPTA. 2. RAM BRISKH PRASAD. BOTH SONS OF LATE LAKSHMAN SAH. 3. SHASHI BHUSHAN PD. GUPTA, SON OF RAM LAKHAN PD. GUPTA. 4. RABI BHUSHAN PD. GUPTA. 5. ARBIND KUMAR. 6. RAJESH KUMAR. ALL SONS OF LATE RAM BILASH PD. SUMAN. ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-PARASIAN THAKURAI, P.S. NASRIGANJ, DISTRICT-ROHTAS(SASARAM). ………………………...PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS-APPELLANTS. Versus 1. SHEO PUJAN SINGH, SON OF LATE CHHATHU SINGH. 2. GURU CHARAN SINGH. 3. AMIRCHAND SINGH. 4. KAPURCHAND SINGH. 5. KRISHNA SINGH. NOS.2 TO 5. ALL SONS OF LATE BISHWANATH SINGH. 6. MITHILESH SINGH. 7. SURESH SINGH. BOTH SONS OF SHEO PUJAN SINGH. ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE-PARASIAN THAKURAI, P.S. NASRIGANJ, DISTRICT-ROHTAS(SASARAM). ……..DEFENDANT IST PARTY-RESPONDENT IST SET. 8. DASRATH SINGH. 9. RAMASHRAY SINGH. BOTH SONS OF LATE RAM NIHORA SINGH. 10. SUDARSHAN SINGH. 11. DHANJEE SINGH. BOTH SONS OF DASRATH SINGH. 12. BINAY SHANKAR SINGH, SON OF RAMASHRAY SINGH. 13. BACHCHA (SHASHI KANT), MINOR SON OF RAMASHRAY SINGH UNDER GUARDIANSHIP OF HIS FATHER ,THE NATURAL GUARDIAN. ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-PARASIAN THAKURAI, P.S. NASRIGANJ, DISTRICT-ROHTAS(SASARAM). …………DEFENDANT 2ND PARTY-RESPONDENTS 2ND SET. ………………………………………………………RESPONDENTS. ----------- For the Appellants : M/s. Mohan Jee and Subhash Chandra Bose, Advocates. For the Respondents : None. ------------ 6. 9.7.2009. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants. - 2 - The issues sought to be raised by the learned counsel for the appellants amounts to reappraisal and giving a finding on facts which have already been concluded concurrently by the two courts below. No substantial question of law which is required to be considered in this Second Appeal, in my opinion, has been raised by the learned counsel for the appellants. In that view of the matter, there is no merit in this Second Appeal which is dismissed. P.S. (Abhijit Sinha,J)