ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.6565 OF 2008 PETITION NO.6565 OF 2008 PETITION NO.6565 OF 2008 Shri Vasant Changdeo Gaikwad ...Petitioner Vs. Kailas Mahadeo Mhaske & Anr. ...Respondents. Mr.S.S.Shah for the Petitioner. Mr.Niranjan P.Shimpi for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 01st October, 2008. : 01st October, 2008. : 01st October, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. . The Petitioner-Original Plaintiff has challenged the reversal order whereby the Lower Appellate Court granted injunction in favour of the Respondents- Defendants against the Plaintiff, though the trial court after considering the material on record granted injunction in favour of the Plaintiff-Petitioner against the Respondents. 2. The controversy revolves around the physical possession of the suit property. Both the parties have claimed actual possession of the suit property. The documents as reflected in the order of Courts below, need detailed enquiry and scrutiny. Both the ( 2 ) parties are claiming possession of the property in part, in view of the agreement/ documents on record. The suit is for injunction based upon the title. Therefore, without going further to the root of the matter, I am inclined to direct the parties to maintain status-quo with respect of properties in question till the decision of the suit. 3. In view of this, the present Petition is disposed of with directions that parties to maintain status-quo pending the decision of the suit. In the ends of justice, it is desirable that the suit itself is disposed of, expeditiously. ( ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)