XI-HC-78 ^ *ii*icn^m^ ^3wT ^q|«lo<<,yTTl<M<l<A, Rlril<ti^ rfar ^..<''...//.^.;...??..^..<S./.?.^-^200 3TT^$T qgq? (^<li^6|«g) 3n^^T€pTR^i<b nsH3n^CTsp<ii<p ?^:rTWr^cT3TI^5T (pi<4[o<Tlrt <ii<ioV^"I^»<£l^Ri^i^ <R 3lRl<1 3TI^?T PETI'HONER RESPONDENTS 1. The Sta Surendija Prasad Sharma, aged about 46 years, S/o La1|e Shri Sunder Lal Sharma, Occupation Warder [(Prahari), Central Jail Raipur, Tehsil and District|Raipur(CG), resident ofJaii Line, Quarter No.I/43|RaipurTehsil and District Raipur (CG) ersus e of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretaxy, Departm^nt of Home Affairs/Jail and Transpor|ation, Mantralay, DKS Building, Raipur, „£ Tehsil an|d District Raipur (CG) 2. The Deplity Home (J4 Raipur {(^G] 3. The Dire^ of Jails, Raipur (CpG) 5. Mohd. Secretary, Chhattisgarh Government, il) Department/Mantralay, DKS Building ^tor General of Police 8& Inspector General. Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Te.hsil and District 4. The Sup^rintendent of Jail, Central Jail, Raipur, Tehsil an|d District Raipur (CGA) lialil Khan, Warder/Prahari, Central Jail, Raipur, Tfehsil and District Raipur (CG) Writ Petition under Article 3S26/227 ofthe Coastitution ofladia S.B. Hon*ble Shri Dhirendra Bllishra. J. 26.11.2008 Shri SK Thomas, coziase for fhe petitioner, Shri YS Thakiir, Dy AG fj)r the State. This petition is directe|d agamst the unpugned order dated 19.9.2003 (Annexure P/l) wh^reby the petitioner, who is Jail Warder aad posted at Central Jall, Raj|pur was transferred to Sub Jail/ Pendra Road, '\. 1,1 vs ^/^/ XI-HC-78 ^im^y *11*101 ^<TT^ ^rcsr^nzn^zr, tpTTI^i<i<»,Rlrii'My<< -s-J^^Y^' .. ^ •2-^b /C)^^200 31T^5T IRZF (X3?fg^4f) 3n^5T<RTf^n<p ?CT3TT^<T3Rfcp S^fTSRxiRa 3TT^5T •2- ^/ Shri YS Thakur, leamed| subicdts fhat by virtue of iateru|a fhe order unpugned could not circuxastances, fhe traiisfer redundaat and ineaniagless fhat he has no objection if iaipugned is set aside witii orders m fhe matter of administrative exigency, wifti Dy. Advocate General for the State order dated 29.7.2004 of this Court, 1|>e given efiTect to tiU date and in tihiese c|rder of Annexure P/l has become fhe lapse of time. He furttier submits petition is aUowed and fhe order to fhe State to pass appropriate of fhe petitioner under the the Ublerty trtosfer In view of above submisslon mstaQt petition is aUowed, so far as it relates to fhe shaU be at Uberty to pass fhe petitioner in fhe event ofad^mi <PI<lfcl)<Tlv1 <1l<1wT^'(^^l \Rl^l\ ^S 3lRl*l 3TT^$T of learaed coim.sel for the State, fhe toraasfer order ofAnnexure P/1, ^oner, is set aside, However, the State orders wifh regard to transfer of j|mnistrative exigency. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge Ini^ugned petitJLoner appr^priate