1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 200 OF 1996 Ibrahim Mohamed Chahalil. ..Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.479 OF 1993 WITH SUO MOTO PETITION NO.3 OF 2005 Ramzan Sabit Hussain. ..Appellant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. Mr.Rajesh More, APP for State. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : NOVEMBER 24, 2005. DATE : NOVEMBER 24, 2005. DATE : NOVEMBER 24, 2005. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Learned APP states that information has been received by the concerned police officer that the appellant accused is presently in Kerala. That information has been received almost one month back. No reason is forthcoming as to why appropriate steps have not been taken by the concerned officer to execute warrant on the accused on his Kerala address. By way of indulgence, two weeks further time is granted to the State to do the needful to ensure that 2 the warrant is executed on the accused, as the appeal is already dismissed in terms of the conditional order passed as back as on 31st July, 2003. Post this matter on 15th December, 2005. 2. Copy of this order be forwarded to the Commissioner of Police, Bombay to take necessary action against the concerned officer(s) for the inaction in taking steps to arrest the accused whose appeal is already dismissed as back as in July, 2003 and to report compliance in that behalf within six months..