... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.863 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.863 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.863 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1483 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1483 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1483 OF 2004 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri Sherali S. Khan for the Applicant. Shri D.P.Adsule, A.P.P for the Respondent. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : DECEMBER 12, 2006. DATE : DECEMBER 12, 2006. DATE : DECEMBER 12, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Earlier bail Application filed by the Applicant was rejected by the learned Single Judge (Coram: Shri V.M.Kanade, J). After this Application was placed before the same learned judge, by order dated 29th September, 2006 he directed that the Application should be placed before the regular court. 2. The Advocate for the Applicant submits that the Applicant has already completed 39 months of sentence and though Appeal is expedited, it is not being heard ... 2 ... till today. 3. Considering the observations made by this Court, while rejecting the earlier bail Application, no case is made out for grant of bail as of today. 4. Liberty to the Applicant to file private paper book and to move the concerned court for fixing an early date of hearing. If the Appeal is not heard within the period of six months from today, liberty to the Applicant to apply afresh for grant of bail. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE