HIGH COURT OF CHHATT!$GARH: BILASPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4821 OF 2004 (Writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of lndia) Single Bench: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present : Shri Subhash Yadav, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Bhaskar Payasi, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORAL ORDER PETtTiONERS 1. G.S. Sahu, $10 Shri Madan Singh Sahu, aged about 33 years, Asstt. Teacher (Tribal Department), Government Higher Secondary School, Bacheii, Distt. Dantewada (CG). 2, Smt. C. Bhoumik, W/o Shri SHK. Bhoumik, aged about 43 years, Asstt. Teacher (Tribal Department), Government Higher Secondary Schoci, Bacheli, Distt. Dantewada (CG), 3. Smt. K. Harun, Wlo Shri S.K. Harun, aged about 42 years, Upper Division Teacher, (Tribai Department), Government Higher Secondary School, Bacheli, Distt. Dantewacla (CG). 4. Smt. Suman Dewangan. W10 Shri Dilip Kumar Dewangan, aged about 49 years, Upper Division Teacher, (Tribal Department), Nawin High School, Kodenar No.2, Kirandul, Distt. Dantewada (CG). Versus RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. Commissioner, Tribal Development, Government of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG). 3. Collector (Tribal Development), District Dantewada (CG). 4. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Dantewada, District Dantewada (CG). District Treasury Officer, Dantewada. Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts & Pension, Raipur (CG). 7. Principal, Government Higher Secondary School, Bacheli, Distt. Dantewada (CG). %) 6 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are entitled to grant of two increments, as they have obtained the BEdJBIJ. certificates on their own expenses during the service period‘ Learned counsei further submite that the petitioners may be granted liberty to make represenmtion to the authorities for grant of two increments pursuant to the judgment and order dated 3-4-2006 passed by this Court in W.P.No.3977/2003 (Yashwant Kumar Bhardwaj vs. Municipal Corporation, Burg a Another). Wt 2) The State Government is under an obligation to follow the law settled by this Court and it is not necessary to approach this Court by each and every employee when the law has already been settled by this Court. The employees, who are similarly situated and have not approached the Court, may be treated at par with other employees, who have approached this Court. lt is not necessary to approach this Court for similar order. 3) ln view of the foregoing reasons, this petition stands disposed of. lf ‘3 the representation is tiled by the petitioners, the same may be considered and decided as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 4) Consequently, pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. " I l sw- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge i V Thakur \7,\\ V"\::: _