1 CRA No.529/11 mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.529 of 2011 Tushar Shantilal Soni ... Applicant versus Smt.Pramila Pandurang Golambade ... Respondent ... Mr.S.S.Jain for the applicant Ms.Trupti Khanvedekar i/b R.R.Arolkar for the respondent CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 20th July 2011 P.C. 1. In my view, revision application deserved to be dismissed on grounds more than one. Firstly, revision application is not maintainable in view of proviso to section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure which says that the High Court shall not, under this section, vary or reverse any order made, or any order deciding an issue, in the course of a suit or other proceeding, except where the order, if it had been in favour of the party applying for the revision would have finally disposed of the suit or other proceedings. 2. The present revision application is directed against the order refusing to frame an additional issue. Even if the revision 2 CRA No.529/11 application was to be allowed that would only amount to framing of additional issue and not finally dispose of the suit or proceeding. As such, revision application is not maintainable. Secondly, the order is purely an interlocutory order declining to frame additional issue and/or recasting of the issues and calls for no interference. Civil Revision Application is rejected. (D.G.KARNIK, J)