^f" p ^W^^S^' £twtsi±8Bii^ " -^-?-"r\"o^:. :'^~ f^yo ^^^£^^- ^^ te d-"" BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G. WRITPETITION (S) N0. 84-7- 12Q03r^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. PETITIONER o <^v RESPONDENTS c Shivrat Singh Mahipal, aged about 64 years, son of Late Shri Birbal Singh Mahipal, retired Head Master, resident of Ward No.9, Gandai - Pandariya, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through - tts Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralay, Raipur (C.G.) /2 The Director, Department of School Education, Chhattisgarh, Raipur. /-3 The District Education Officer, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) 4 The Block Education Officer, Block Chhuikhadan, Distt. Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) RESPONDENTS ^- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 847 of 2007 Shivrat Singh Mahipal, aged about 64 years, son of Late Shri Birbal Singh Mahipal, retired Head Master, resident of Ward No.9, Gandai - Pandariya, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). 2. The Director, Department of School Education, CKhattisgarh, Raipur. 3. The Dista-ict Education Officer, Distt. Rajnandgaon 4. The Block Education Officer, Block Chhuikhadan, Distt. Rajriandgaon (Chhattisgarh). (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present : Shri Abhijit Sarkar, Advocate forthepetitioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passedon7t" dayofMay,2008) 1. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. 2. This petition pertains to payment ofretiral benefits. 3. This Court, in the matter of W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of the retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were mvolved. The Committee was constituted by the State Govemment, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Govemment and others) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105/2008 (State of Chhattisgarh and others Vs. Baijnath Mandal and another). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31 of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other connected matters, as submitted by the leamed counsel appearing for the parties. 4. This petition is disposed of in the same terms i.e. the office of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and the officers concemed, within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concemed may file additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner, be completed within a period of four months from the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. 5. The petitioner shall supply oneextracopyofthepetitiontothecounsel for the State for transferring the same to the committee. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur