IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.685 of 2011 Raushan Kumar son of Anil Sharma resident of village- Kanauli, P.S. Kako District- Jehanabad under the guardianship their father. … Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar … Opposite Party. ----------- 4. 26.09.2011 The accused- petitioner has preferred this revision application under Section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 against the order dated 3.5.2011 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jehanabad in Cr. Appeal No. 15 of 2011 by which the order dated 15.4.2011 passed by the learned Juvenile Justice Board, Jehanabad in Kako P. S. Case No. 57 of 2010, G.R. No. 557 of 2010, Trial No. 328(j)/2011 under Sections 307 and other minor sections of IPC and 27 of the Arms Act has been confirmed and the appeal has been dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been declared a juvenile and his prayer for bail was rejected by the Juvenile Justice Board. Thereafter, the petitioner filed Cr. Appeal No. 15 of 2011 which has been dismissed by the impugned order on the ground that the release of the 2 petitioner will defeat the ends of justice. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the mother of the petitioner will take care of the petitioner. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he has been in custody since 12.5.2010. Learned A.P.P. for the State could not controvert the contention of the petitioner while opposing the prayer. After hearing learned counsel for both the parties and on perusal of material on record as also the Probation report dated 20.9.2011 of Probation Officer, Jhehanabad, it appears that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and there is nothing on record to show that the release of the petitioner will defeat the ends of justice. Considering the facts and circumstances stated above, in my opinion, the impugned order is not fit to be sustained. It is set aside. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Juvenile Justice Board, Jehanabad in connection with G. R. No. 3 557 of 2010, Trial No. 328(j) of 2011 arising out of Kako P.S. Case No. 57 of 2010 with following conditions;- (i) One of the bailors must be the mother of the petitioner. (ii) The mother of the petitioner will take care of the petitioner and she will produce the petitioner in the Court if and when required. In case of absence on two consecutive dates, his bail bonds would be liable to be cancelled. (iii) The petitioner will not indulge himself in similar or in any other offence. (iv) In case of violation of the terms and conditions of bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the learned Juvenile Justice Board and he will be liable to be taken into custody. In the result, this revision application is allowed. Kanchan (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)