WP(C) 771/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. BARUAH Heard Mr. U.K. Deka, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. T. Chutia, learned Standing Counsel, SEBA appearing for the respondent No.3. No ne appears on behalf of the respondent No.1 and 2. As agreed to by both the learned counsel for the parties, this matter is taken u p for disposal at the admission stage. The Director of Social Welfare, Assam published an advertisement vide No. DSW(IC DS) E/92/200861 dated 30.6.2009 inviting applications from the intending eligibl e candidates to fill up the vacant posts including the post of Supervisors in So cial Welfare Department. The petitioner being eligible for the post applied and the Department issued Admit Card to appear in the examination. Accordingly, she appeared in the written examination held on 30.10.2010 under Roll No.13030836 un der Admit Card No.118472 but while returning from the examination hall, she lost the admit card and finding no other way, she approached the authority for issua nce of a duplicate admit card in order to facilitate her to appear in the viva-v oca test scheduled to be held on 12.2.2011. But the petitioner was not allowed t o sit in the viva-voca test scheduled to be held on 12.2.2011. The petitioner th us has approached this Court by filing this writ petition for a direction to the respondent authorities to issue a duplicate admit card to the petitioner. On filing this petition, this Court by an order dated 10.2.2011 taking note of t he facts involved in this writ petition and the relief’s sought for issued a dir ection to the respondents to allow the petitioner to appear in the viva-voca tes t scheduled to be held on 12.2.2011. Pursuant to the order of this Court as indicated above, it is submitted at the B ar that the petitioner was allowed by the respondents to appear in the viva-voca test scheduled to be held on 12.2.2011. The petitioner by filing this writ peti tion has made for a limited prayer, to issue a direction to the respondent-autho rities to provide her a duplicate admit card so that she could appear in the viv a-voca test to be held on 12.2.2011. She having been allowed to appear in the vi va-voca test by the respondents’ authority, her grievance appears to have been f ulfilled by the respondents. Further, it is submitted at the Bar that the respondents’ authority may be direc ted to declare the result of the petitioner when she is allowed to appear in the viva-voca test. This Court finds no impediment to issue such a direction though it is not sought for in the writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents’ authority to declare the result of the petitioner at their convenience.