IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30423 of 2008 1..MANOHAR PRASAD. 2.ANIL PRASAD @ ANIL KUMAR. 3.BASANT KUMAR. 4.HARISHANKAR PRASAD @ SHEOSHANKAR KUMAR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 15/10/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State, as also learned counsel for the complainant/informant who has entered appearance suo motu. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are the sons of one Ram Chandra Prasad admitted to be the tenant in the complaint itself, sent for investigation under Section-156(3) Cr.P.C. The complaint further acknowledges the desire of the complainant to sell his house property. The father of the petitioners was negotiating purchase of the same from the complainant. Learned counsel for the complainant alleges that the father of the petitioners has filed a case for compulsory registration of the sale. In the entirety of the facts and circumstances, let the petitioners above named surrender before the court below within six weeks when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- ( ten thousand ) each along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., - 2 - Motihari in Town P.S. Case No.31 of 2008 arising out of Complaint Case No.206/2008, subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) of Cr.P.C. KC ( Navin Sinha,J )