In the High Court of Judicature at Patna. C.W.J.C.No. 7599 of 2009. Pramila Devi, wife of Sri Dharmendra Kumar Singh, Resident of Village- Suahi, Gram Panchayat, Baghauna, P.S.- Siswan, District- Siwan :-------------Petitioner. -Versus- 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Principal Secretary, Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The District Magistrate, Siwan, District- Siwan. 5. The District Welfare Officer, Siwan, District- Siwan. 6. The Child Development Project Officer, Siwan, District- Siwan. 7. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Baghauna, P.S.- Siswan, District- Siwan. 8. Uma Devi, wife of Sri Uday Shankar Tiwary, Resident of Village- Suahi, P.S.- Siswan, District- Siwan :------ Respondents. 2. 08.07.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner was appointed as an Anganwadi Sevika. Later her appointment was terminated whereafter she approached this Court and in the light of the orders of this Court her representation was considered by the Collector and petitioner was again reinstated. By the impugned order dated 15.05.2009 passed in Miscellaneous Case No. 19 of 2007-08, Annexure-13 the Collector, Siwan has reviewed the earlier order by which petitioner was reinstated as Anganwadi Sevika and appointed Private Respondent No.8. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that learned Collector has passed order dated 15.05.2009 on grounds which cannot be sustained and this Court should intervene in the matter. Against the order dated 15.05.2009, Annexure-13 petitioner has a remedy of appeal before the Divisional Commissioner. 3. In the circumstances, I dispose of this writ application with direction to the petitioner to approach the Divisional Commissioner by filing appeal against the order dated 15.05.2009, Annexure-13. In the appeal petitioner is at liberty to file interlocutory application praying for interim directions for stay of the order dated 15.05.2009, Annexure-13. The appeal filed by the petitioner against the order dated 15.05.2009 be considered and disposed of by the Divisional Commissioner as early as possible, in any case within a period of one month from the date of its receipt along with a certified copy of this order. The interlocutory application praying for interim relief should also be considered separately. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)