c ^ 'v- IN THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARHAT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fS) N0w^ /2011. PETITIONER: Respondents y •• ^^•" ^y Ay^'^>'' ^w" ^y/ ^ •y r^^/^ ^-^ •(S.R.I?W^ik)» ^ ^"^s ^. ^ ^^ ^ff'fl,^ Richa Pandey, Daughter of Ravindra Kumar Pandey, aged about 22 years, residence of village Balpur, Post Chandrapur, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Panchayat and Social Welfare Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Kasdole, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Chhatdsgarh Professional Examination Board, Through Its Controller Examination, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ^ 4. Sitaram Diwan, residence ofvillage ^,\a'^ />t-^i^ahu^^u<^^ ^dt/ ^^^a^o*^ ^i ^ S^l^ A-^^, Pi^- ^^^ ^ c v ^, WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CQNSTITUTIONQFINDIA / .^^ ^v ^1^T'^[1^7f^ ^STi 'STT^TsCTT^ Er ^ Deepii W^^fWW^ ?^T '"Ml^!<ri'4, %S>-(l!'<-i41<o, f^dt-Hy t^.f^f)^-S1^/tl ••^200 3TT^?? T?^T ( ^i^<^>) '^HW;Rf^T W^? SB : Hon'ble Shri IVIanindra Mohari Execlitive 23-06-2011 Shri C.J.K. Rao, counsei for tiie Shri Y.S. Thakur, Deputy No.1 on advance copy. The petitioner has fiied this| petitioner was entitled for grant of a[ for Shiksha Karmi, Grade-3 in Artsj excluded and not cailed for inteme^M in the Handicapped category. Learned counsel for the representation to the Chief represeniation has been made. it isj posts were earmarked for Handicapi but no orders of appointment has be^ The concerned officer is th4r representation and take decision the| by the decision /' order of the Chi^ prerer statutor^ appeai under the Karmi (Recruitment and Conditiont competent authority. With the aforesaid disposed off. petitioner. Ad^ocate General for the State / responcient petition alieging that even though the l^pointment in the Handicapped category group, the petitioner has been iliegaily and respondent No.4 has been seiected ^s^w^l^ ^H<nT^ fe^l' ^f^^ ^3TfW3?T^l Shrivastava. J. pet|ioner submits that the petitioner made Officer but no decision on her |further submitted ihat even though three j)ed category, stiii posts are iying vacant, ?n issued tili date. trefore directed to consider petitioner's j'eon. in case, the petitioner is aggrieved ^f Executive Officer, the petitioner may jprovisions of C.G. Panchayat Shiksha of Service) Ruies, 2007 before the obsen/atjons /' directions, ihe petition is finaliy Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge