1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO. 350/2010 (Smt. Surekha @ Nisha wd/o Jagannath Parkhi and another vs. Kisan Gangaram Parkhi ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mrs. Jayashree Mahajan, Adv.for appellants Mr. M.P. Khajanchi, Adv.for respondent CORAM : A.B.CHAUDHARI,J. DATED : 14th September,2011. Heard. Parties are present in-person with their respective counsel. Learned counsel for both the parties have tendered a compromise pursis with consent terms, duly signed by appellant no. 1 for herself and her minor son and the respondent-sole. Learned counsel for the appellants states that the compromise is in the interest of the appellants. I have gone through the terms and conditions of the compromise pursis wherein there is prayer that the Second Appeal itself may be disposed of in terms of the compromise pursis. 2 In view of the above, there is no difficulty in accepting the pursis as per the terms and conditions mentioned therein. Hence, compromise pursis is accepted. Consequently, Second Appeal No. 350/2010 is disposed of in terms of the compromise pursis, which is tendered today during the course of hearing, and is taken on record and marked “X” for identification's sake. JUDGE sahare