1 ^ T IN THE HIGH COURT OF QHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No^'73 ^/2005 / PETITIONER Shyam Bihari Mishra, S/o. Late Shri Prithwipal Mishra, Aged about 50 years, Occupation-Service (Head Master), Resident of Balenga,Distt.Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS / ^>l.^^'.. ^•^f^-" .....%?^>y' .^^' / ^6"'.^ ^:^1';..-- State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. The Commissioner^ Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur Chhattisgarh. ^ The Assistant Coinmissione^, Tribal Development, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) A / / The Joint Director, Treasury & Accounts, Bast^r Division, Bastar (C.G.) 5./ The Assistant Director, Treasury, Accounts & Pension, Bastar (C.G.) 6. The Block Education / Officer, Bastar, District Bastar (C.G.) /' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22/6/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 'K. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURB CHHATTISGABH: BILASPUR Bi^le Beiieh: Hoi%?ble Shri K- A^ihotrl^ Je W. P. No. 4736 of 2005 Petitioner : Shyam Bihari Mishi-a .? Versus Re.spondents State of Chhattisgarh & others Shri Ashok Kiimar Sbzikla, coiinsel for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Deputy Govemment Advocate for the respondeiits/State. ORAL 0!?DB% (22»dAugiist, 2006) 1. I^eerj^ed coiinsel appearing for the petitioner submits the petitioner was appointed as I^ower Division Teacher 011 1,3.1973 and had beeii working with tbe then Goveniment of the undivided State of Medbya Pradesh. 2. The petitioner has obtained B.Ed Degree on 23.5.1994 (Aniiexiire P/3) which entitled tbe petitiouer for grant of two advance incremente as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 arsd 17.10.2003. 3, According to leanied coiinse.l for the petitioDer, the case of the petitionier is sqiiarely covered by the decision of this Coiirt dated 3rd April, 2006 passed m W.P. No. 3977 of 2003 (Yashwaiit Kumar Bherdwaj Vs» Miinicipal Cos'poration, Diirg & auother) reported in 2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96. Learaed coiinsel appearing for the petitioner prays for the sanie relief in view of the decisioD of this Coiirt. 4. Leenied coninsel appearing for the respondents in his frank and fair siibmissjoi") states tlTiat t1^e present cese is sqiiarely covered by the decision of this Coiirt in the case of Yashwant Kiimar Bhardwaj Vs, Miimicipal C^i'poration, Diirg & arsother (supra), 5, For the reasons stated-above, this petitjon is accoi'diiigty allowed aBd tbe petitioner is entitled to the payiTient of two edvanced increments from fhe date of declaration of his B. Ed examiuation result i.e. 23,5.1994, within a period of three months froin trxiay. No order as to costs. Bablu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge