CWP(T) No. 15618 of 2008 05.05.2010 Present:- Mr. Adarsh Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. P.K.Sharma, Addl. A. G. with Mrs. Shubh Mahajan, DAG for respondent No.1. Mr. C.N.Singh, counsel for respondent No.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he does not press the petition against unserved respondents No.6, 11, 23, 28, 40, 51, 74, 76 and 84. He has prayed for deletion of these respondents. Prayer granted. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner confines her claim to relief No. (3) in the petition and he has further submitted that the relief No.(3) prayed in the petition is covered by the judgment in CWP (T) No. 10220 of 2008 (OA No. 240 of 2004) decided on 17.3.2010 titled Phool Maya Vs. State of H.P. & Others. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents has not denied the statement of learned counsel for the petitioner that relief No.(3) prayed in the petition is covered by the judgment dated 17.3.2010 of this Court in CWP (T) No. 10220 of 2008 (OA No. 240 of 2004), rather they have submitted that relief No.(3) prayed in the petition is covered by the judgment dated 17.3.2010. Accordingly, the petition is allowed regarding relief No. (3) on the terms indicated in the judgment dated 17.3.2010 passed in CWP(T) No. 10220 of 2008. Let a copy of judgment dated 17.3.2010 be placed on the file of the present petition. The petition stands disposed of. May 5, 2010. ( Kuldip Singh ) (GR) Judge.