IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.1558 OF 2005 Mrs.Shardabai P. Deokate ....Appellant V/s. Smt.Shardabai R. Deokate & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.A.P. Kulkarni for the Appellant. Mr.Rahul S. Kate for Respondent No.1. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 6TH AUGUST, 2007. P.C. : 1. By the impugned judgment the learned Judge has dealt with in detail the question as to whether the Plaintiff had been put in possession of ten acres of land. The learned Judge has answered it in the affirmative. This is a pure question of fact. It warrants no interference in the Second Appeal. 2. The Appellant is always at liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings in accordance with law as stated in the impugned judgment itself regarding having the property demarcated. I refrain from making any observations in this regard. 3. The Second Appeal is accordingly dismissed.