IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41847 of 2010 1. SATYA NARAYAN BHAGAT S/O LATE LAXMI BHAGAT 2. RAM BHAGAT S/O LATE LAXMI BHAGAT 3. TIKESHWAR BHAGAT S/O SATYA NARAYAN BHAGAT Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH S/O LATE DUKHA PD. SINGH ----------- 3. 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the state. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 468,471 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that in the facts of the case it appears to be a case of civil dispute between the parties. In view of such, in the event of surrender of the petitioners, named above, within three weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 1074 C of 2004, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Saharsa, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the 2 petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioners, (ii) That the petitioners shall undertake to be represented on the first date after cognizance and in case they fail to do so, their bail bond will be liable to be cancelled, (iii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)