IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1501 of 2007 MUKH DEO SHARMA, SON OF LATE BISHWANATH SHARMA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-UDWANT NAGAR, P.S. UDWANT NAGAR, DISTRICT-BHOJPUR. ……………………………………PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER. Versus 1. KAUSHALYA DEVI, WIFE OF ISHWARI DAYAL SHARMA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-DALLUCHAK KHAGAUL, DANAPUR, DISTRICT-PATNA, PRESENTLY RESIDED IN THE VILLAGE AND P.S. UDWANT NAGAR, DISTRICT-BHOJPUR. 2. SUSHILA DEVI, WIFE OF PRADEEP SINGH. 3. AJIT KUMAR SINGH. 4. RAGHU NATH SINGH. 5. ARUN KUMAR SINGH. SON OF LATE SIDH NATH SINGH. 6. DHARAM SHEELA DEVI, WIFE OF YOGENDRA SINGH. 7. RAM JEE SINGH, SON OF LATE RAM EKBAL SINGH. ALL ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.S. UDWANT NAGAR, DISTRICT-BHOJPUR. …………INTERVENOR-OPPOSITE PARTIES (1ST SET). 8. RABINDRA SHARMA. 9. DIN DEYAL. 10. SHEO DEYAL. 11. RAM DEYAL. ALL ARE SONS OF LATE RAGHU NANDAN SHARMA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.S. UDWANT NAGAR, DISTRICT-BHOJPUR. ………………...DEFENDANTS-OPP. PARTIES (2ND SET). 12. RAM DEO SHARMA, SON OF LATE BISHWANATH SHARMA. 13. KEDAR SHARMA. 14. RAM AYODHYA SHARMA. 13 AND 14 ARE SONS OF LATE SHEO PUJAN SHARMA. ALL ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.S. UDWANT NAGAR, DISTRICT-BHOJPUR. …………………..PLAINTIFFS-OPP. PARTIES (3RD SET). ----------- 3. 30.9.2010. Mr. Md. Ataul Haque, learned counsel for the 2 petitioner, appears and submits that the plaintiff-petitioner has already withdrawn the concerned Title Suit No.29 of 2003 and, as such, this Civil Revision has become infructuous. M/s. Rajendra Nath Sinha and Arvind Kumar Sinha, are present on behalf of the opposite party nos.1 to 7. In the above view of the matter, this Civil Revision is dismissed as having become infructuous. P.S. ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)