1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 32 OF 1996 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 676 OF 1995 Renuka A. Chatterjee ...Plaintiff. Vs. Sandeep H. Sharma ...Defendant. Mr. Purnima G. Bhatia for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendant. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 24th November, 2009. P.C.- 1 None appeared for the Defendant/caveator since long and basically on 08/09/2009, 06/10/2009, 03/11/2009 and today again, though the matter is listed under the caption “ For Ex parte Order”. 2 In view of this, the objection/ caveat so filed, is dismissed for want of prosecution. 3 Resultantly, the Petition as filed remained without any objection/caveat. The office to proceed in accordance with law. However, the liberty is granted to the Respondent to apply for modification of this order. 4 The suit is accordingly disposed of. No costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)