L63 [yoga @ // l /[ EN THE H}§H €0URT OFJUE31CATUREAT BILASPUR CG W. P. (S; No.5?Lw/2009 PETETEONER Raghupati Prasad Yadav S/o Shri Deo Narayan Yadav, Age about 46 years, R/O H. No. 365, Near Ayappa Tempel Ambedkar Ward, Jagdalpur (CG) VERSUS ”I. State of Chhattisgarh Through— Secretary, Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and Bakward Class Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralay‘a, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Commissioner, Tribal Development Raipur (CG) The Secretary, Mata Rukamani Sewa Sansthan Samiti, Dimrapal, Tah. & District—Jagdalpur (CG) RETPETTTEONUNDERARHCLE82260FTHECONSHTUTTON OF INDIA Particulars ofthe Petitioner z As mentioned ab'ove in the cause title. Particulars of the Resyondents; As mentioned above in the cause title. z W W ,‘ EIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH A1" BILASPUR WRIT PETITION S No. 5244 of2009 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ‘ SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Aggjhotri, J. Present: Shri S.P.Kale, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer far the State. ORDER ORAL) (Passed on 14 day of September, 2009) Heard learned counsel for the parties. 1. - Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the instant petitiori is squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered in Smt. A.Lall v. State of Chhazt‘z'sgarh & Othersj, thus the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to decide his case in the light of aforestated decision, subject to verification asto whether the respondent No. 3~Institute is a Government Aided school and the petitioner is a teacher within the sanctioned strength. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same will be considered and decided, in aceordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 3. In View of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the . petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposedof. ‘ Sd/-' ‘ ‘. [Satish K. Agnihotrig . ” .5 Judge ’ , M 1 2007 (1) BLJ 265 PETITIONER Raghupati Prasad Yadav. I VERSUS RESPONDENTS V : State of Chhattisgarh &