THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.10496 OF 2010 ORDER: Heard Sri Kowturi Vinayakumar, Learned Counsel for the petitioners and Smt. Kalpana Ekbote, Learned Standing Counsel for the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC). At their request the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. The petitioners grievance is against the 4th respondent. It is their case that they had purchased plots of various extents and that a lay out had been approved by the Fateh Nagar Gramapanchayat. While matters stood thus respondents 1 to 3 are said to have called upon the owners of the plots to seek regularization of the lay out. It is the petitioners’ case that the fourth respondent, without making any reference to the lay-out approval granted by the Fateh Nagar Gramapanchayat, had surreptitiously deleted the petitioners’ plots in the lay out plan submitted to the GHMC while seeking regularization of the lay out in question. It is their case that, despite their representations dated 16.5.2008 and 8.4.2010, no action has been taken thereupon by the GHMC. Smt. Kalpana Ekbote, Learned Standing Counsel for the GHMC, would submit that, before regularizing the lay out in question, respondents 1 to 3 would consider the petitioners’ objections. Recording the said submission of the Learned Standing Counsel and, in as much as the cause in the Writ Petition does not necessitate any further adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. _________ 30-4-2010 Note: C.C. in 10 days B/o asp