IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.1823 OF 200 CRI.APPLICATION NO.1823 OF 200 CRI.APPLICATION NO.1823 OF 2009 Mr Edwin Wilfred Pinto, .. Applicant. Vs The State of Maharashtra, .. Respondent. Mr M.S.Mohite i/b Vijay Tawde & Hemant Kenjalkar, for the applicant. Mr Y.S.Shinde, APP, for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 22/04/200 DATE : 22/04/200 DATE : 22/04/2009 PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard Mr.Mohite, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr Shinde, learned APP for the respondent. Though there is an order granting anticipatory bail in favour of the applicant passed by the Sessions Court, the applicant has approached this Court in view of the peculiar nature of the said order. While granting anticipatory bail, the Sessions Court has observed that the order of anticipatory bail shall remain operative till filing of the chargesheet, if opinion/report of hand-writing expert is received in favour of the applicant, and if the opinion/report is adverse to the applicant, the order of the anticipatory bail shall remain operative only till receipt of such report. This part of the order, in my opinion, needs to be modified in the following terms. . The police shall give 72 hours notice to the applicant in the event the report of handwriting expert is adverse to the applicant, to enable the applicant to approach the appropriate court for appropriate relief. With this modification, the application is disposed of. It is made clear that rest of the order dated 3.6.2008 remains unaltered. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)