•^. x^^>-- ..u-'f' y.-<'' .•••'" €a^'?f^ T: ^•s'. •-;:..'•• 8SKULC Bfci'iia.is ..-•"',•S"^ 'S.N'"" ^i^^"'" ^^...--"" c'^"' C^i w IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER : W.P. (s) No. ..^.2^.......J2Qf^— 'Rajendra Kumar Sagar S/o Shri Dhoor Singh Aged about 37 years Post Assistaat Teacher Govt. Primary Chirchari Khurdh, Block Churia Distt. Rajnandgaon VERSUS RESPONDENTS: l^. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2: District Education OfGcer, Chhuria, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ^: Block Education Officer BIock- Chhuria District- Rajnandgaoa (C.G.) ^VMT PETmON U/A 226/27f OF THE CONSTITUTION OF BNDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SNTABLE WMTS AND DIRECTIONS The above named petitioner most humbly and respectfully begs to submitas under:- & HI6H COURT OF CHHAmSfiARH AT BIUtSPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HQN'BLE MR. SATtSH K. A6NIHOTRI. J. WRTT PETmON (S) N0. 464 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Resoondents Hemrai Kumbhkar State of Chhaf-isgarh andothers WRTT PETmON (S.) N0. 4(S OF 2007 Petitioner versys Resoondents Siddharth Choure State of Chharttisgarh ond others WRTT PETTnON fS.1 N0. 466 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Resoondents Panch Ram 5ahu State of Chhatt-isyirh and others WRTT PETmON IS.) N0. 467 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versys Manharon Lal Pi'thaura State of Chhattisgarh and olfiers WRTTPETTTION (S.) N0. 468 OT 2007 Petitioner versus Resoondents Yaggaya Datta Baghel State of Chhatl-isgarh ond o-thers WRTT PETmON /S/t N0. 469 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versus Shih Khoperckiy State of Chhattisgarh and others •^?7^\ WRTT PETmON (5.1 N0. 470 OF 2007 Petitioner versus ResBondents RnAiey Kishun Pa'tel State of Chhanisgarh and o-thers WRTT PETTTtON (S.} N0. 471 OF 2007 Petitioner : AAanganLal versus Respondents : Storte of Chhattisgarh and o-thers WRTT PETmON (S.t N0. 472 OF 2007 Petitioner : Dhat Singh Sonwoni versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh ond o-thers WRTT pETmoN (s.) NO. 473 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versy.s Onkar Lal Sonboir Stnte of Chhattisgarh ond others WRTT PETmON (S.) N0. 474 OF 2007 Petitioner verajs Resoondents Shiv Kumar Sharma State of Chhuttisgarh and o'thers WRTT PETmON (5.1 N0. 47B OF 2007 Petitioner Reaaiondents versus Rajendro Kumar Sagar State of Chhatt'isgarh ond others WRIT PFTmON fS.l N0. 476 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents yersys Makhanlal Thakur State of Chhattisgarh ond o+hers WRIT PETTCr^N (5.1 N0. 477 OF 2007 Petitioner verais Respondenls Fool Chand Kdroleshwar State of Chharttisgarh and o-thers SffiTUETmON (5.1 N0. 478 OF 2007 Pe'tTtTOner yersys Resoondents Rajendra Kumar Oewengcai State of Chhattisgarh <md others And WRTT PETTTION (S.) N0. 479 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versys Jcyant Kumar Shendey Stcrte of Chhatl'isgarh and o-thers 1. Present : Mr. R.K. Jaiswal, Advocute for the petitioners. Mr. 5ushil t»ubey, fiowmment Advocate for the State/respondents. ORbER (pa.ssed on 24th Ctay of January, 2007) Learned counsel oppearin9 for •the petitioners as well as teamed Govemment Advocate appearing for the State/respondents jointly submit that -the fad-s and question of law invohwd in the present batch of writ petitions are squarely covered by -the decision of this Court m the case of ysahwwit Kumw BluHwdw^f vs. Munie^af Cwywwften. fluy dwrf aw^fcw*. 2. In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2006 {6opesh Kumar Vwwavs. Tfie Stats 6avt. of Chhattisgmii anrf anothfi) and o-ther connected matters, decided by this ^-^ S| Courf- on 15-12-2006. purannt to •the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by Ihe Secrelury, Board of Secondary Educatwn. Bhopal ond the prospec-hjs of Diplomn n Education Examination, it was ctarified -that •the nomencfature of the Basic Training Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been chan9ed ond rwwmed as Diploma m Education, i.e., b.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (ftyws* Kumar Vermavs. The Staie Sovt. of Chhatlisgai4i andeswfhei) (Supra). 3. For •the aforementioned reasons, -the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of Yadiwnit Kumar fltow<AKy" (Supru), subject to verification of -riie fact cs to whe-ther the petitioners have acquired B.T.I./O.Ed. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circulars chted 24-12-1998 ond 1-3-1999 and further whetiier Ihey have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. 4. A copy of this order be placed on •the record of •Hie connected writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 2006CTI)<M>JR-C696 Thakur