IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14475 of 2009 DEEPAK KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THRU. VIG. ----------- 4. 05.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the Vigilance. Considering the supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner as well as the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the Vigilance which shows that still 1 crore and odds are undefined and unexplained. This is the sum which was paid to the petitioner through Account Payee Cheque for construction of houses under Indira Awas Yojana. Vouchers relating to this amount have not been submitted till date. I do not feel inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer is rejected. akv/ (Mridula Mishra,J.)