^•-B^ ^-^ fc ^lngle Bench (^P-\^n /- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION (S) No. U 0,0 \ /2010 Dhal Singh Joshi, s/o Late Ganesh Ram Joshi, Aged about 30 years, r/o Village- Raipura, Post- Sambalpur, Tehsil-Dondi-Lohara, District-Durg (CG) Petitioner Versus State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of School Education, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG) State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of General Administration, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG) District Education Officer, Durg, District- Durg (CG) Principal, Government Higher Secondary School, Badgaon, District - Durg (CG) Respondent No.1 Respondent No.2 Respondent No.3 Respondent No.4 ^" WRIT PjTITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA w^i:"d: "'''"'^^^. ^ J'^ . "-^ if [^s^ '^ XI-HC—78 3Ti^T •^1 fqiicn WTW^T^TRtcF ^ ^1*1^11 (^Hl^ ^ST ^iqi<n<4, y^l<H<i<o, fsi<yii-M^< ^;:......!^..&..&>.!&(<?.:...yA!^Qg ^n^?TXRRr (yit^^i) ^nw^f?^ 3:f?^i 8B : HOK»BLEMR. JUSTECE PifclTENKER DIWAKSR 3Q.OS.2010 'Shri. Prasun BIiaduii, coii-i •SIiri Paiikaj Shrivastava,. I| Bhadi^ri. Contention of Shri fhat for the redressal of fhe grie^ applicaafck):Q/ llas akeady been P/3) before the respondent NoJ d.ecided till today, .He' siibniits senred if direction is issue< application. State cbiinsel has no obje issued for deciding tlie pending i Considermg the facts and present petition is disposed respondeut. N0.3 to decide tl petitioner as expeditiously as y monfhs froin tiie date ofreceipt It is niade clem' fhat fhis opinion on merits of the case would be at liberfc^r to decid accordance with law. <5hl^^i1'i ^IR^f ^f fe^ <P»l^l< ^^tf^R^I^T isel for t3ie petitioner. .1. fortheState. d, <x>unsel fbr the petitioner is rance of tlie petitiosier, a proper filed on 24.4.2009 (Annexzire 3 .biit the sam.e has not been that ends of jiistlce would 'be for decidirig fhe pending ^tion if ajiv such directions are ipplication of tiie petitioner. circum.stao.ces of the ca.se, the of with a direction to the .e peiidi.ng appIicatioB of the ossible preferably withiri three >f copy of tliis order. Court has not expressed ao.y aiid tlie. aufhorit^ concerc.ed e tlise application strictly io. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge A^