''rS1''^:.*.--.'';^' ,;'.:^ S.B. : HON'BLE SHm SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. Kll V Dinesh Kumar Vemia Aged about 40 year, A-sstt. Teacher S/'o Shri Janak Kenwaradih Block-Kharora, Distt. Raip ur (C.G.) Yashwant Kumar Tandan Age about 32 year, Asstt, Teacher S/o Shri Chhedu Ram Tandan Primary School Shilouni Block-Tilda, Distt.-Raipur (C.G.) S/'o Shri' j Ta-l-ra^ ivai 4. Venna Primary School Madhaipur Block-Kharora, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) Dinesh Kumar Verma Age about 41 year, Asstt. Teacher S/b Late Shri Devcharan La! Verma Primary School Farhada Block-Kliarora, Distt.-Raipur (C.G.) Kunjan Das Kurre Age about 40 year, Asstt. Teacfaer S/'o Shri Mohar Das Kurre Govt. Primaty School Kharora Block-Tilda, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) Rakesh Kumar Verma Age about 31 year, Assft. Teacher S/o Late • Shri School Tarashiv Block-Tilda. Distt. -Raipur(C.G.) '. Manvi.shram Gilhare Age about 41 year, Asstt. Teacher S/o Shri Ghasidas Gilhare Govt. Primary School Khouli Dabari Block-Tilda, t.-Raipur (C.G.) ;. Sate Kuamr Dewangan Age about 37 year, Asstt. Teacher S/o Shri Santram Devvangan Primary School dvadih Block-Tilda. Distt.-Raiour 'f^"- wS. ^^^?^^.^^''^^::^^J1^?^^^^^ '^^' (C.G.) 9. Tulsi Ram Verma Age about 48 year, A-sstt. Teacher S/o Shri Awadh Ram Verma Govt. Primary School Budera ilock-Tilda, Distt.-Raipur (C.G.) lO.Naresh Kumar Verma Age about 34 year, Asstt. Teacher S/o Late Shri shyam Ratan Verma Middle School Farhada Block-Tilda, Distt.-Raipur (C.G.) ll.Khodas Ram Vemia Age about 32 yem, Asstt. Teacher S/o Late Shri Tribhuvan Lal Verma Primarv' School Tarashiv Block-Tilda. Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) lESPONDENTS ; 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarii, Through-Secretan' Tribal Welfare Denartment & Education Denartment D.K.S. Bhawan, Distt.-Raipur(C.G.) 2. District Education Officer Raipiir District-Raipur (C.G.) 3. Block Educanon Officer Kliarora & Tilda District-Raipur (C.G.) Present: ShriAjay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioaer. Shri Vinay Pandey, Panel Lawyer for tne State/ ndents. <_ (Passed on 03rd ofApril, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondente jointly submit that tbe fact and questioa of law involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municlpal Corporation, Durg another {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Leamed couDsel appearing for th< respondents does not controvert tfae said submission. "^^ In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Vernw vs. Ttte State Govt. of Chhaltisgarh and another) and other connected matters, decided by this Court on 15-12-2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretaty, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Diploma i'a Education Examination, it was clarified that the nomenclature ofthe Basic Trainmg Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed and renamed as Diploma in Education, i.e., D.E.d. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by tfae decisioc ia Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Venmi vs. The State Govt. cif Chhattwgwh (inofher) (Supra). Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed ia the case ofYashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Mmiicipal Corporation, Durg another (Supra), subject to verification of the fac.t as to whether ths netitioners have acauired D.Ed. Examination Certificate on own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.199! and 01.03.1999 and further whetfaer they been paid hvo advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge <r Sabliaah