lifFiJFI^TTT^"^ !aRi<t's l!;ifN!i 'E •w, I) i Bil ~"k NfQM^iUR'l'^IPGMI-iA'iHSiSjSRItftl-BlE.ASR.iR W.P.fS) No. 3871 of 2005 Petitioner Respondenis Versus M. K. Sharma, aged 32 yeacs, Sfo Late C. P. Sharoia, .^jstant T^Ber, ©ovt.MulBpurposeiNigher Secon6lafyiSch<»ot,BiiaspuF(eKG4 State of Ctihatti^arft, Throygh ISspsrii'nefe MaritralaKa, ; @.K^>. 2. Djstriigti SiauratiojiOffieer, ©istrtet- Bi!a3pyr©Bhaffisgarh). SB:l-lgRII}te;MriJasC?eSa{{$h{<.^nthotri,J ShriY/C.Sharrnd.^d<^Eate^^*et|:^tiBoBer. Msss Sunite Jain^i'ane! tasysr^oF^sirasRondents®tate. O R D E R (PaSS9dofTthis1^>IdayofMarch,2a}7); Thefo!knanngGreleroftheeourti3passedi?ySatishK.AgRjhO&i,tf. •JI.ini^^R^ttiORer laftiiis worldng as Assistent Teachsr at Gsvt. 1 ^MiS^i^segljj^er Seeonda®|>eh60l,ipla3pur vras^^te ^ :;^j£!8l^^h^|Jc©pMrat^Slrapl^FjSKgJ ^6l^fc:-'Bitha,on |:giJ3fsan'te^ tenss'ij^;^|!i^3^wieimj^Redofderdated3.8.2G01^ i.A/1).a|'',. .^ ; -,.•. .• •, : : - . • :.. : :;: ; 2. The WIa^l'i^JSratissh Adtnirtisfrative Tribunal at Raipur wt9& interim 'l'."- '•' '. ..'. . • . . ' . ':''••.'• ' ' ••••''• " •:'•'••• • • ' ; ofdCT<E{at8{tSltDi.2001 directe^to maintatnstatusciuoinregareltettie poaGaiT^ tliSpetifonsF as Nsas prevailKig on 25.8.2001. Byvirtueof ftie inteBm of|ter the peS^oner is contBiiJJng atthe origina! piace of posting;.'' :"-f';r.' . ;! •.;..'',: '; •~: 1 • 3. Be tfiat as it nsay, with IRe RSssage offifne thtsjpeStion f't^lbetxim^ ^nfmctuousaslperiodoftraRSferisnotappli^bleifore^ of time there is no qyestioni to examiJB®tt^ vafidity of the frans^s^ order. Nowever; the Tespondente^are ^ jiter^^ pass^f® •:"n .i\-M 4^\[" SIiliil il: a!ijffirf! ::). il M','^' j)Ei llil-lil KSS!l lillptli Kfll -"Fhakw; .^ ie>. GrdersteepinginMewthapHbltCir^re^and^ministrat^e^ mthoutinsistjngoRcomplianeeofth&impugnedtransferoi^er. 4. !t is weil settled principte of law that transfer is an incidentof service and st is fer tte emptoyer to cfecide 3S to where a parficular o{Sce?/employee bs posted. lesepma iit view pubiic intetsst as well ss admmistrafive exigeney. This Court has Sitnited jurisdictton to interfere in thetrahsfei^matterandthisC^rtcaBinlerfereonlyinttiecaseGf proved malafKie, non-sompetenGe of auffioFHy (Kissing tiie tean^r o??ter and Iransfer oKler not being in conformity with {h6 rutes and TeguiatioRs. 5. In wewof th&above.ttiis pefition stands disposed of.NooKlerasto "cods.- '• " : ' . ! : • • : • ^' Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotd Judge a.nr" fW III.IL .li'^i