IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1272 OF 2003 IN IN IN SUIT NO. 3293 OF 1999. SUIT NO. 3293 OF 1999. SUIT NO. 3293 OF 1999. Searock Enterprises P.Ltd .. Plaintiff versus Laxmi Refreshment & ors .. Defendants ... Mr.V.Yadav for Plaintiff. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 24th March 2005. DATED : 24th March 2005. DATED : 24th March 2005. P.C:- P.C:- P.C:- 1. Heard learned counsel for the plaintiff. None present for the defendants. Though Mr. Saraogi advocate is stated to have taken out the motion for the plaintiff in fact the motion is taken out by him for the defendants. He was appearing for the defendants. He has prayed for setting aside of the exparte decree. None is present for the defendants at whose instance motion is taken out when called. Motion is dismissed in default. D.G.KARNIK, J