IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION 1st Bail Application No. 398 of 2009 Order on the Bail application of accused. Kamal Qurashi S/o Kayum Qurashi …… Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ……. Opposite party In Case Crime No. 193 of 2008 U/s 379 and 411 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Roorkee District Haridwar Hon’ble J. C. S. Rawat, J. Heard Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate for the applicant; Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. G.A. for the State; and perused the record. After due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties; contents of the F.I.R.; perusal of the document filed by the parties; perusal of the recovery memo; the fact that the accused/applicant was driving the car which was subject matter of the theft; and in the facts and circumstances of the case, it is not a fit case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application is rejected. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 04.06.2009 Shiv