HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITON No.19851 OF 2007 ORDER: The petitioner was allowed plot No.168 of Jubilee Hills Co-operative House Building Society Limited and a Sale Deed was executed on 13-05-1985. The extent of the plot, as per the sale deed, is said to be 2,493 square yards. The petitioner states that there is an excess area of 619 square yards adjoining the plot allotted to him and that he was permitted to retain the same by the society as a compensation for the construction of a public drainage system through the plot of the petitioner. The property is now said to be in enjoyment of the petitioner. Reference is made to certain orders said to have been passed by the Society, in favour of the petitioner in respect of the excess land of 619 square yards. 3. The petitioner states that on 22-07-2007, the officials of the Municipal Corporation, Hydeabad, the respondent herein, have removed the compound wall constructed by the petitioner on the Southern side and shortly thereafter, the respondent Corporation constructed a compound wall encroaching an area of 328 square yards, stating that it is earmarked for a public park. 4. The petitioner submits that the officials of the respondent have absolutely no justification in taking possession of the site of 328 square yards, that too, without issuing any notice or without following the procedure prescribed under law. He submitted a representation, dated 06-08-2007, to the respondent to re-deliver the possession thereof. This writ petition is filed for the relief in the form of a direction to the respondent to hand over possession of the site to him. 5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent. 6. The extent covered by the sale deed executed in favour of the petitioner by the Society is 2,943 square yards. Copies of some letters said to have been issued by the Society in favour of the petitioner in relation to the neighbouring vacant land of 619 square yards, are filed. It is difficult to make any final pronouncement as to the right of the petitioner over the land, which is not covered by the sale deed, as of now. Further, by the time the petitioner approached this Court, possession of 328 square yards was taken over by the respondent from out of the excess area. The question as to whether the petitioner had acquired title as regards, the area over and above the one covered by the sale deed in his favour needs to be decided at a later stage. That would be possible only when the respondent makes its stand clear about the enclosure of 328 square yards with compound wall in the immediate neighbourhood of the petitioner. The petitioner and the respondent would be in a position to decide, which course of action to pursue. The representation cannot be kept pending indefinitely. 7. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent to examine the representation, dated 06-08-2007, filed by the petitioner and pass orders therein, within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It shall be open to the petitioner to produce the copies of relevant documents before the respondent along with the copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J March 31, 2011 KTL