IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25138 of 2008 NAUMI RAM @ NAVAMI RAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 18.12.2008 Heard Mr. R. K. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D. Mehta, learned A.P.P. The case is under section 394 of the Indian Penal Code and the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. On being put on T.I.P. he was identified by the informant. The contention is that T.I.P. was held after about two months of the petitioner’s arrest and during that period the petitioner was paraded bare face from the Hazat to the court premises exposing him to be identified by the informant. There is no recovery of any theft property. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case and the contention, let petitioner named above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with Bhabua P.S. case no.412 of 2007. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )