IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.22557 of 2010 Date of Decision: December 17, 2010 Kulwinder Kaur .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. B.S. Bhalla, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) CWP No.22557 of 2010 [2] 1. Learned counsel, in this civil writ petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, contends that respondent No.6 (Sukhwinder Kaur @ Paramjit Kaur) got the job of Anganwari Worker on the basis of a forged certificate as is evident from Annexure P-4 dated 28.6.2010, a document obtained under the Right to Information Act, 2005. Name of the father was changed. Original certificate is in the name of a person, daughter of Ajit Singh whereas respondent No.6 is the daughter of Gurmander Singh. 2. A representation was made by the petitioner vide Annexure P-6 on which, however, no decision has been taken. 3. On consideration of nature of issues, I find that a fact finding enquiry is required to be conducted by the authorities. 4. The petition is disposed of with direction to the Deputy Commissioner, Moga, to have an enquiry conducted as to whether respondent No.6, Sukhwinder Kaur had used a forged document to take employment as Anganwari Worker and thereafter, re-consider the issue, if it requires consideration. (AJAI LAMBA) December 17, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?