WP(C) 4202/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. K.C. Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Goswami, learned standing counsel Water Resources Department appearing for the respondent s. The petitioner’s claim in the present petition is that though pursuant t o various work orders issued, he executed the work to the satisfaction of the co ncerned authority, an amount of Rs.46,03,431/- is still due and payable to him, which according to the petitioner has not been paid despite making various repre sentations. The learned standing counsel, on the basis of the instruction received, has submitted that an amount of Rs.19,96,470/- is only due and payable to the pe titioner and not Rs.46,03,431/- as claimed by him. The learned counsel for the appearing parties have submitted that the is sue involved in the present writ petition, relating to non-payment of the contra ctor’s bill, has already been answered by a Full Bench of this Court in Tamsher Ali & ors. Vs. State of Assam & ors. reported in 2008(4) GLT 1 and as such the w rit petition may be disposed of in terms of the directions contained in the said judgment. In view of the above, writ petition is disposed of directing the respond ent authorities to register the name of the petitioner in the register maintaine d by the department and to pay him the amount which is due and payable to him in terms of the position in such list. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.