1 c.a.16547.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16547 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL ST NO.32769 OF 2010 [Maruti Dagdu Gaikwad and others Vs. Putlabai Dagdu Gaikwad and others] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri.Suhash B. Rohile,Advocate for Applicant. Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 absent, although served .... CORAM: SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATE : 18th FEBRUARY, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard Mr.Rohile,learned counsel for the applicants. 2. This is an application preferred by the applicants for condonation of delay of 33 days caused in filing Second Appeal challenging Judgment and decree dated18.06.2010 passed by the District Judge – 4, Osmanabad in Reg. Civil Appeal No. 204 of 2003. 2 c.a.16547.10 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders 3. For the reasons stated in the present application, it appears that the applicants have explained the delay satisfactorily. It also appears that the said delay is not willful, deliberate and intentional, and hence, same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 4. In the result, present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause [B] of the present application and delay of 33 days caused in filing accompanying Appeal stands condoned and accompanying Appeal be registered and numbered and present application stands disposed of accordingly. Sd/- [SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J.] MTK