IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Application No. 952 Of 2009 Dr. Kishore Lal Virdi …………..Petitioner Versus Amar Jeet Singh ………….Respondent Mr. S.S.Chauhan, learned counsel for the Petitioner. Dated: December 11th , 2009 Hon’ble Alok Singh, J. Heard Sri S.S.Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Chauhan stated that cheque bears signature of the petitioner, however cheque was not issued to the complainant but to the brother-in-law of the complainant. He further stated that entire amount of loan has already been paid to the brother-in-law of the complainant. This court while exercising jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. cannot enter into the question of fact and appreciation of evidence. From the perusal of the complaint, I find that cheque was returned with the remark insufficient fund. Since issuance of the cheque under the signature is admitted and it was returned with the endorsement insufficient fund, summoning order does not call any interference. Petition is dismissed. (Alok Singh, J.) 11.12.2009 Nishant