{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO.1746 OF 2005 Vishwanath Dharmaji Ingale R/o Kharosa Tq. Ausa Dist. Latur APPELLANTS. VERSUS 01- Saraswati w/o Baburao Kshirsagar R/o Kharosa Tq. Ausa Dist. Latur. 02- The State of Maharashtra Through Collector, Latur. 03- The Tahsildar, Ausa Dist. Latur. 04- The Village Panchayat of village Kharosa Tq. Ausa. Dist. Latur. RESPONDENTS. *** Shri S.S.Halkude, advocate for appellant. *** Coram : P.R.BORKAR, J. Date: 17th June 2009. P.C.: 01- Heard Shri Halkude advocate for appellant / original plaintiff who filed suit for declaration and injunction in respect of plot and the suit was dismissed by the trial Court so also by the District Court on the ground that the suit is barred by principle of res-judicata. 02- The discussion in para nos.18 to 20 of the District Court {2} judgment clearly indicate that previously present respondent no.1 filed suit for declaration and injunction against the present appellant bearing RCS No. 187/1995. That suit was dismissed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Ausa. As against the same order, respondent no.1 filed RCA No.177/2000 where declaration of title and perpetual injunction was granted in her favour by judgment dated 07/02/2002 and the same was further confirmed in Second Appeal by this Court. It is specifically stated by the trial Court and the first appellate Court that the previous dispute was in respect of the same plot. Considering the reasons given, the trial Court and the first appellate Court have rightly held that present suit, filed by the appellant / plaintiff, is barred by principle of res-judicata. The appeal is not tenable. No substantial question of law is involved. The appeal is dismissed at the stage of admission. [P.R.BORKAR] JUDGE. /mda/0609/sa1746.05