IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 1ST JANUARY 2007 / 11TH PAUSHA 1928 OP.No. 3815 of 2002(D) ---------------------------- PETITIONERS: ------------------ 1. LISSIE PAUL W/O. P.K.PAUL, PUTHUPPILLIPARAMBIL,MUTTITHADI P.O.,KALLUR, THRISSUR. 2. SAVITRI A.K.,KARANATH VEEDU, W/O.K.V.DINESAN, MURIKKUNGAL P.O., PERUMBILLICHIRA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. BINDU M.R., W/O. CHANDRASEKHARAN, MONAKATH VEEDU, KUTTANELLUR P.O., THRISSUR DT. 4. VIJAYAN K.MENON, S/O.KRISHNANKUTTIMENON, PULIKKAL VEEDU, ANTHIKKAD P.O.,THRISSUR DT. 5. STALIN C.V., S/O. WILLIAMS C.P., CHERUSSERY VEEDU, VANIYAMPARA P.O.,THRISSUR DT. 6. JAYAN M.M., AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.MADHAVAN, MAILAPPAN VEEDU, KAINOOR P.O., THRISSUR DT. 7. SATHEESHKUMAR M.V., S/O. VELAYUDHAN, MULLAKKATTUVALAPPIL VEEDU, KUMBALANGAD, KANJIRAKKODE P.O., THRISSUR DT. 8. K.K.CHANDRAN, S/O. KUNJAPPAN, KODAKKADATH VEEDU, AKAMALA, ANGANKAD P.O., THRISSUR DT. 9. ABDUL HAKKIM V.A., S/O. ABDUL KHADAR, VESAKKARAN HOUSE, PATTIKKAD P.O., THRISSUR DT. 10. VINOD P.S., S/O. SANKU, PULIKLAL VEEDU, OLLUKKARA P.O., PANDARAPPARAMBU,THRISSUR DT. 11. T.RAGHUNANDANAN, S/O.K.SRIDHARAN NAIR, THATTATTU HOUSE, P.O.PATTIKKAD, THRISSUR DT. 12. C.V.VENUGOPAL, S/O.C.R.VELAYUDHAN, CHEMBIPARAMBIL HOUSE, PERATHUSSERY, IRINJALAKUDA. OP. NO.3815/2002 13. RAMACHANDRAN T., S/O.PARAMESWARAN KAIMAL SEETHARAM QUARTERS NO.91, P.O.PULLAZHI, OLARIKKARA, THRISSUR DT. 14. ROY T.V., S/O. VARUNNI,THRIKKUKKARAN HOUSE, PANAKKUTTICHIRA, P.O.OLLUR, THRISSUR DT. BY ADV. SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN RESPONDENTS: --------------------- THE KERALA STATE HORTICULTURE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, UDYAGIRI,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SMT.K.SUNITHA VINOD THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================================= O.P.No.3815 of 2002 ================================== Dated this the 1st day of January, 2007 J U D G M E N T The petitioners are retrenched workers of the respondent Corporation. According to the petitioners, they have been retrenched illegally. At the time of admission of the original petition, the learned Single Judge of this Court granted an interim stay of operation of Exts.P1 and P3 orders, by which the petitioners have been retrenched from service. Later, in CMP No.6815/2002, this court passed a further order to the following effect: “Any appointment shall be made only after obtaining orders from this Court.” Still later, the interim orders were modified as follows: “The interim order is modified as follows: Any appointment made by the respondent will be subject to the result of the O.P. As and when the appointments are made there will be direction to the respondent Corporation to consider the case of the petitioners also in case they are eligible to be considered.” 2 In the above circumstances, I am of opinion that this original petition itself can be disposed of in terms of the modified interim order dated 12.4.2002. Accordingly, I dispose of this original petition in terms of the interim order dated 12.4.2002. Interlocutory applications stand closed. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE 3 S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ========================= O.P.No.3815 of 2002 ======================== J U D G M E N T 1st January, 2007