IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL No. 615 OF 2009 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 27/11/2008 in WPMP No. 33523 of 2007 in WP NO : 25733 OF 2007 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Archakam Bokkasam Maruthi Prasad and another ... APPELLANTS AND Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam, rep., by its Executive Officer, Tirupati, Chittoor District and four others ... RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellants: Sri N. Raghavan Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: Sri P. Harnatha Gupta Counsel for Respondent No.5: Sri K. Raghava Charyulu The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (Per Sri Anil R. Dave, CJ) The learned advocate appearing for the appellant has submitted that the appeal has become infructuous. 2. In the circumstances, the appeal stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. 3. As a sequel to disposal of the appeal as infructuous, WAMP No. 1229 of 2009 filed by the appellants for interim relief is also disposed of as infructuous. 4. The learned advocate for the appellant has submitted that the appellant would like to make a representation on the subject matter of the appeal. It would be open to the appellant to make a representation on the subject matter of the appeal to the concerned authority. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 17th September, 2009 ks