%,^^^^;,:^':^^^^ HI6H COURT OF JUDICATURE CHMATTIS6ARH ; BILASPUR &IVISIONBENCH CORAM^HON'BLE^HRI^K HON'BlE SHRI V.K. SHRIVASTAVA, J. ^; ~: APPELLANTS MISC. APPEAL (ONO; 352 OF 2007 1) ROmji lal Bhart-i 5/o Chhmrii Lai ^9e^ Q^°^ ;:Sotncimi/-':.'. '-';li^^ 2) $angq bai W/G Ramji Lal^^^^^ Ageclabout-SSyears ! •'•'•.; : /" '• BotH R/o Village - Barpalj, Post - Bade bhandaf, PS Pusaur, Tah <& Disft Raigaph '•(C^ •./,-•...-./'.•lt:'''.. RESPONDENTS Versus '.-:..1.'•,.';••.-•,". 1) Smt BQldeo Xaur W/a^^^ S Singh Aged abot • (not mentioned) R/o - RabbQrwGllService Station, ©E Rocd, burg, Di^tt^ ^ (OWNERQFTMEVEHIGLE):; 2) ^zaib Singh-S/b Hazaira^^^ about - 65 Y€O^S Pern1ahent Address :- RdmnagQr. Supela, Bhilai, Gistt - Durgi (C6), Present address :- ©abarwalPetrpl Purnp, Durg, Official Address :- ftdbarwql Seryice S^ation^ SE Road, Distt- Durg <&RIVER OF THEVEMICLE) 3) New India Insuran^ CompQny Ltd, PGrakh BhQwan,| Statin Roari^^^^^^^^^^^^D^ Throu9h ;- Brcrich Manager Branch Office, Sattigydji Chowk; Rai9arh(Ce) < — ^: Present : ^ri MQHOJ Jais^ '^.l '-1-1- '• ,• :'^' . :1 .'•-.-.1-1'''1'';". .: ^ohe^brth6r€Spond€nts. --^-— f8 ^^ ORAL<?R&ER (Possed on 231'd AAarch, 2007) The follpwing oral order of the Court was passed by Vjjay Kuinar Shrivastaya; J. This appeal under Section 173 ofthe Moto (for shdrf *%e Act"') has b^eridirected against th -^.•/••. '• .-' • •.': . .•• ••,•• SO.11,2006 passed by FiT§t Addittonal Motor Acddent Ciaims Tri buna!, RGigdrh (henceforth 'fheTribunal") for enhancement bf compensort'ion, in CIaim Case NoJO/2006,| whereby a sum of /. Rs.1,57,500/~ hcis been ciwarded to the c laimanfs/appeltants* 2) Factual matrix of the case in brief is thcrt^ M 15.05.2006 Ku<$on}ata whp was aged about 7 years met with an accid sustained injunes and succumbed to those* Respondent No,2 .-.1 .'.. .'• . ' • ' . /' i " ".• ; ~ • • drjvmg Tanker No. A^P-09/KC/l^^^ insured wjtKrcspondent No,3, in a rasharid negH^ the csccident* Her RGrents who are apReltants herein filedan application under Section 166 ofthe Act- for grant^o^^^^^^^ agaihst respondent$ who are owner/driver^ m offending vehicle, bnver/ and: owner remained av ftarte cmd ^\e insurer contested the clGim. 3) The Tribunal after due enqujry aitpwed compe^^ ^- .;-•". . • :' ^ bejow":'./^ . :" ••:"•.•; ' ." •"..•.'•:- • .,.:. •...'.•.. •-':';' ..•••.•'.^.-' • ••., '"•..:;-''~.'.-'''.'.";':- ^) loss of incqme b) ^uheral expehses c) ^tpss bf estate •'v :"••—..:,''.\ •••'-• lotel ^mount Rs.1,50,000/- Rg.5^00/- Rs.2,500/- Rs.1,57,500/- •3 4) We have heard leqrned counset for the appellants who urged and canvassed conripensotion on tower side, 5) Ws have gone through the award. The deceasecl was aged 7 years, She was not an earhing member, Learned Tribunat correctly took notionalincome Rs.15000/- per dnnum, reduced l/3t'd, (ippiied muitiplier of 15 and recorded loss of incdme, Tribunal also allowed compenso^ic^ cm ather }}eo.ds. . 6) The award passed by the Tn bunal does n6t suffer fromGny illegality or infirmity, which moy call forinterference by this Gourt Sd/- Chief Justice under its Gppellate jurisdiction. TherefQre,the^a^^ in fimine. Sd/- V.K. Shrivastava Judge X. \.' A ':•\