^^^wl^l BS'OBE THE HON'BtE STA3E ADMIKtSTRATOTE TRIBUBAL BENCH AT RAIPUR.(M.P) P.R.Gahine, S/o Shri.Sahas Baa Gahine, Age about 59 years, Principal, Goveraaent College of Education, Bilaspur, R/o Govemaent College of Education Cgmpas, Tarbahar Chowk, Bilaspur. (M.P) 495001. ....APH-ICANT. VERSUS. G. D. » f.oT^^y (A.o/oc^r&) M----iv^ Distt. ) J° (B,?.? t^SiA .Nc.-21;/S4 ,^ 1, State of M.P., through : Secretary, School Edaeation, BHOPAL.(M.P) 2, Dii'ector, State Institute of Educational Besearch aad Training, Board Rest House Caapus, Shivaji Nagar, BHOPAL. (H.P) 3. Commissioner, Public Instructions, Madhya Pradesh, Gautam Nagar, Hear Chetak Bridge, BHOPAL. (M.P) 4. Ittss. S.D.Chaudhary, Principal, Govemment College o£ Educatioa, BIUSPUR. (M.P) 5. P.K.Ahuja, S/o Not Known, Regional Director, Natioaal Counoil for Teacher Education, • ••»^-»• • • "f.a iiiiuaBii; (A ,T ^. '"'/-' /y // 2 // WS •X ^. ^^ .X :;i.Wi. V\>0/ v ,,-^,^ " ,^ 7i'^Ayi' ^ y Shyanla Hills, BHOPAL. (M.P) 6. Deedar Slngh, S/o Hot Kno^in, Principal, Goveriuaent College of Education, HIOPAL. (M.P) 7. A.K.Mit-tal, S/o Not Known, Bireetor, English Language Iraining Institute, Qimaauri, BHOPAL. (M.P) 8. M.P.Gupta, S/o Hot Known, Addi-tional Director, Office of the Director, Publie Instructions, M.P., Gautan Nagar, BHOPAL. (M.P) 9. B.B.Singh, S/o Not Known, Principal» Govemment College of Education, JABALFUR. CM.P) 10. G.P.Tiwari, S/o Bot Known, Additional Birector, Office of the Director, Publie Instrlictions, M.P., Gautam Nagar, BHOPAL. (M.P) 11. R.S.Dwivedi, S/o Not Known, Director, State Institute of Education, Board Rest House Caapus, Shivaji Nagar, BHOPAL. (M.P) RESPOMENTS, • • • »^ » • 7fc // 5 // APPLICAIION U/S 19 OF THE ADMINISTRATNE TRIBUNALS ACT. 1985 *ll*ic>i ?SW ^3wl"yi^irt<4, UTnwia, Rl«i<«y<( v)^. (s.^nv.'Ly^o^ sntsTwK-iicb naiian^CTsbHicb "i Tymane 3TI^9T tRcp (4cl1'i^t<Ei) ^^cr" g^IT8R^rii(T.311$?7 SB: Hon'We Shri Manindra Wlgha 04-02-2010 Shri N. K. Vyas, counsel for Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lat| None for respondent No.4. Heard. The instant petition was filed] on account of promotion of his junic^ grade of Rs.4,100/-. In the return wf that a departmental enquiry is pen| stated in the return that vide charg^ was instituted against the petitioner departmental promofion committee sealed cover to be opened after con< Learned counsel for the peti has been conc'uded and final ord charges leveled have not been exonerated. In view ofthe aforesaid deve direction to respondents to open 1 relating to the petitioner made by tt appropriate decision in accordance the date of receipt of a copy of tl approach the respondents by fiiing his case as to opening of sealed guidelines and ths law governing the Certified copy as per rules. tfie tBi«lCT<?ll*tl*tnT^T" ls'^1 •((uit^l'c ^3lf^t(3II^?I Shrivastava.J, petitioner. ?yer for the Statejirespondents No. 1 to 3. by the petjtioner aggrieved by his supercession •s i.e. rsspondentsNo.4 to 11 to the next higher ich was filed on 03-08-2000, it has been stated ling against the petitioner. It has been further sheet dated 19-06-1996, departmental enquiry and therefore, recommendations made bv' the n the case of the petitioner, have been kept in ;lusion ofthe enquiry. ioner now states that the departmenta! enquiry ar has been passed on 19-04-2001 in which found proved and the petitioner has been opments, the iostant petition is disposed ofwith he sealed cover containing recommendations ;e departmental promotion committee and take n/ith law with an outer limit of four months from iis order The petitioner shall be at liberty to appropriate representation for consideration of cover in accordance with various aovernment ifield. ^s^A(» SAI- ^ovvaft "3»A^ S\rf^as ,ia"a