IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30603 of 2010 PRINCE GAUTAM SON OF VINOD SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 15.11.2010 Counter affidavit filed today on behalf of the informant be kept on the record. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence u/s.304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that in the First Information Report itself it has been conceded that it was this petitioner who informed about unfortunate death of his wife as also that the postmortem examination report did not reveal any serious injuries on the person of the deceased which would have caused her death, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 20.7.2010, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in Samastipur Town (Mufassil) P.S. case No.719 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the 2 petitioner, (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )