HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 3498 of 20W Petitioner Kartik Ram Sahu Sfo Jagannathya Sahu, Aged about 60 years, R/o’ Mohmra Village, Patwari Hallm No.26, Bhilaigarh Tahsii, Raipu‘r Dist, C.G. State. Respondents Versus 1. Stata of C.G. Through Secretary (Rev‘enue). Govt. of C,G. DKS Bhawan, Raipur, C.G. State ‘ 2. Dist. Collector, Ralpur, OG state 3. Tahsildar, Bhilaigarh Tahsll Dist. ' CGSiate 4. Nai-Tahsildar, Bhatgaon, Bhllaigarh Tahsil, Ra'ipur Dist, C.G. State (Wn‘t Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia) SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri Present: Shri K. R. Nair, counsel [for the petitioner. v Shri AS. Kachhwaha, Govt. Advocate for the Stateirespondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 25‘" June, 2007) (1) With the consent of learned counsel for the parties the matteris heard finally. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was granted Patta of the land bearing Khasra No.1551l1JA and 1551/1/JHA total area .766 hectare, situated at Viiiage Mohhra Patwari Halka _ No.179, Teheil Baloda Bazar, Tahsil Bhilaigarh, District Raipurion 23.10.1972 (Annexure P-1). The Tehsildar, Bhilaigarh ori the basis of some complaint initiated a proceeding for cancellation of the said Patta. (2) The petitioner filed an appeal, being appeal No.22A/74 year 2005-06. In an appeal filed before the Additional Coilector, Baloda Bazar, the Additional Collector vide order dated 22-082006 (Annexure F5) held that the action taken by Naib-Tahsiidar, Bhatgaon in the matter was not in consonance with Section 30 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959 and accordingiy directed the Tahsildar, Bhilaigarh to transfer the matter. Thereafter again, by the order dated 04.10.2006 (Annexure P-S) the Additional a greets“ Collector, Baioda Bazar, passed the same order and direated the Tehsildar, Bhilaigarh, to withdraw the mater from the Court of Naib-Tahsildar. Despite the above stated order of Naib-Tahsildar. Bhatagaon, learned counsel submits that the Naib-Tahsildar has proceeded with the matter and no action is being taken by the higher authorities. (3) in view of the above stated facts, the Collector, Raipur is directed to ensure the compliance of the order dated 22-08-2006 (Annexure P'5)’ and 0440-2006 (Annexure P-S) passed by the Additional Coltector, Baloda Bazar in case No.22A 174 year 2005-06 forthwith, within a period of two weeks. (4) ln view of the foregoing, this matter sands disposed of. Karuna l Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge l