018,"*! 'pa' -4'- w ;^ <• f- ^T)-6 Z— (2) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARtt AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S)NO. U3 f20Q7 PETJTIONERS ^^ffi -.^>/'^y (^~/.v^ /.^.y / li5W ^.' <<-'/f <~'.^ t?~ RESPONDENTS ShivLalChandra S/o ShriTopi Lal Chandra Age about 37 years, AssistantTeaeher, Tribal PrimarySchool.Kupupahari, Block - Kartala, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) ^. Lakhan Singh Kanwar S/o Shri Bam Singh Kanwar Age about 36 years.AsststantTeaGber,, Govt. Primary School, Chikanipali, Block - Kartala, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) Smt. Santra Bai Kanwar S/o Shri Lakhan Singh Kanwar Age about35 years, AssistantTeacher, Govt. Primary Sehool, Junwani, Bldck-Kartala,Distt.-Korba(C.G.) '4. Ram Prasad Patre S/oShri Shri Das Patre Ageabout38years,AssJstantTeaeher, TribalPrimarySchool,Supatarai, Block - Kartala, Distt. -Korba (C.G.) VERSUS StateGovfcofChhattisgarh Through: Secretary, SchoolEducationBepartmentMinistry, D.K.S;Bhavan,Rajpur(C.G.) .<e. (3) 2._ Directorof Public Instruction Raipur(C.G.) 3. DistrictEducation Officer Distt.-Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE_2260F^THE CONSTITUTION QF INDIA XI-HC-78 HI*IWI sfiHrai s^'-qpncpr, wTflwis, (siciwy ^•f,rs)^o. eg^ W^2QQ7 3n^?TMa<»)(ytgaK^iT) sn^rqirf^iRi (ISIT3iI^Tst>1 '\< Thakur .^- ^Rnwflfwsn^r 6.2.20)7 Mr. Somkant Verma, coun^el for the petitfoners. Ms. SunitnJain,Pcnel faw^er for the respondents/State. With the consent of lea(ned counsel for the parties, the matters ore. heard finalty and disjposed of. Common order dictated inl Court, passed separotely. A copy of •this order be (tlaced on record in connected writ petitions. 'shi<<tci41-< iiHci) ffto3'<Ri«i< ^sri^irsn^T W.P. (s) No. 669 of 2007 in o(«n Sdt;:, •Satis]i|||a|i Judg^l P.T.O. HIQi^OURTOTCHHA'HTS&ARHAT^BIU^'Ut SaMSLfcBENCH : H^ K. AWIHOTRI. J WRFT PETmON (riNO 669 OF 2007 K lfe€; ••& % ~^ Petitioners Regiondents versys Shiv Lat Chandmand o-Hiers Statefiovt. ofChhattisyu''hando'thers WftFr PETTFION Crt N0 670 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Respondents Ku; Ra'hiaSudha Rowteke StateSovt. ofChhattisgarh wid anolher WRIT PETmON (s) N0 671 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Resoondents Srat. Ahuradha Pandey TheSta'teGovemmentofChhattisgarh ondonol+ier And IffiTTPETrTION fst N0 672 OF 2007 Peth'ioner' versus Re^ondents Dite^) ((umar Verma The State 6ovt. of Chhatt'isgarh and othsrs / Present : Mr. Somkant Verma, counsel for the petitionerS. Ms. SuniTaJain, Pcuiel loiwyerfor IheSTate/ pesponctents. ORDEJt 0»assedon •riiis 6th Oay of Pebruary, 2007) 1. Leamed coynsel (^pearing for the petitioners as ^llas tearr^ Penal lawyer o^ipiearing for the re^iondenl's/State jointly submit •that the fac+s and question of taw invplved in the present writ petition are squarely covered by •the decision of This Court in the I- «i,, >-.f4il ^> •^^ case of yashwanf' Kmiaf' Bfiansdwe^ vs. Mwucipal CofpwwHwi. Oury eavl eirwfhe^. Leamed counsel c^pecu*ing for the petitioners has pointed out the circulap dated 13.9.1974 (AnnexureP/1), wheFeunder accordmg to the petitioners, the petitioners, u»ho had obtained B.Ed. Exaroination Certificates before cypointment, ore also entitted to two advcaice inGrements. The responcIents/State, while considering the ca^s of -the petitioneps, Aall grant-rfie retief.in accordance with the circular (supro). For the aforementioned reasons, these writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Gourt in the matter of )^^i«w^^u^r^a^Ai<iy'(&ipro),sybjecttQverificotionoftiie fact asto whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.T.I. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circubrs dated 24-12-1998 ond 1-3-1999 and further whether they have heen paidtwo advance increments or not. No prder cis tocosts. A copy of this order be ptaced on record in connected writ petitions. ^^s^, •Satisiii'iS -Wdge, 1 20060I)A JR-C&96 Thakur