IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.657 of 2006 MOHAMMAD SHAMIM KHAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 6. 27.8.2008. N.H./ Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner in spite of repeated calls. Earlier also, the case was called for but none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the opposite party is present. This revision has been preferred against the order of grant of maintenance passed by the Principal Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram thereby the petitioner has been directed to pay maintenance to the opposite party no.2. It further appears that the petitioner vide order dated 7.12.2006 obtained an interim stay against the impugned order. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, this application is dismissed and the court below is directed to take steps in accordance with law for payment of the maintenance amount to the opposite party no.2. ( Ghanshyam Prasad )