C.R.No.5783 of 2006 1 HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.5783 of 2006 Date of decision : 8.5.2007 Radha Kishan ........Petitioner versus Subhash Chander .......Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA. Present: Sh.R.K.Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Sh.Ajay Jain, Advocate for the respondent. * * * ORDER HEMANT GUPTA, J. The challenge in the present revision petition is to the order passed by the learned Rent Controller dated 31.10.2006 whereby an application filed by the petitioner to decide the question of admissibility of documents in evidence, was declined. It has been found by the learned Rent Controller that the admissibility of the documents is to be decided at the time of decision of the main petition and mere exhibition of the documents is not a proof thereof. The reasoning given by the learned Rent Controller cannot be said to be suffering from any patent illegality or irregularity which may warrant interference of this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. The admissibility of the documents in evidence is required to be considered by the learned trial Court at the time of final decision after the parties conclude their evidence, if such question is not decided at the time C.R.No.5783 of 2006 2 of leading of evidence. Since an objection has been raised by the petitioner at the time of production of the documents in evidence, the same shall be decided by the learned Rent Controller at the time of final decision. Consequently, I do not find any ground to interference in the order passed by the learned Rent Controller. The revision petition stands dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) May 8, 2007 JUDGE *mohinder