-:1:- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 444 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO. 444 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO. 444 OF 2008 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2624 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.2624 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.2624 OF 2008 AND AND AND CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 445 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO. 445 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO. 445 OF 2008 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2625 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.2625 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.2625 OF 2008 Mr. A.S. Kelro. ... Applicant. V/s. Kishore A. Karia & Anr. ... Respondents. Miss. Reena Salunkhe i/b. Rajiv Matkar for the Applicant. Mrs. A.A. Mane, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL,J. : K.U. CHANDIWAL,J. : K.U. CHANDIWAL,J. DATE DATE DATE : 014TH AUGUST, 2008. : 014TH AUGUST, 2008. : 014TH AUGUST, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . Heard learned Counsel for th Applicant/Original Complainant. 2. Being aggrieved by the order of acquittal dated 25.3.2008 for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, the Applicant/Original Complainant wants to seek leave. However, in both the applications, there is respectively delay of 28 days and 27 days which is occasioned due to the Applicant being 72 years old person and could not make application in time for certified copy of the Judgment. -:2:- 3. Delay in both the applications condoned. Issue notice to the Respondents returnable on 22nd September 2008. 4. The complainant’s Advocate will also ensure service by R.P.A.D. or Courier upon the Respondent. (K.U. (K.U. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.) CHANDIWAL,J.) CHANDIWAL,J.)