IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11861 of 2008 RAM DUTT PRASAD, Son of Sri Mansha Prasad, resident of Village- Jagdishpur, Tola- Dewlia, P.S. Jagdishpur, Anchal-Nautan, District- West Champaran....................................................................................Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Bikrama Prasad, Son of Mansha Prasad, of Village- Jagdishpur, Tola- Diwlia, P.S. Jagdishpur, Anchal- Nautan, District-West Champaran. .....Opposite Parties. ----------- 2. 30.04.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The present application has been filed for quashing the order dated 15.02.2008 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.IV, West Champaran, Bettiah, in Cr. Revision No. 156 of 2007 whereby the criminal revision has been dismissed. The petitioner has also challenged the order dated 12.06.2007 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Bettiah, West Champaran, whereby the complaint case no. 2550C of 2006 has been dismissed. From perusal of the complaint, it appears that the dispute is with regard to partition and subsequent mutation between the parties. Hence, prima facie it appears to be the dispute of civil in nature. Hence, I am not inclined to interfere with both the orders of the learned Judicial 2 Magistrate, Ist Class, Bettiah, West Champaran, as well as the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. IV, West Champaran, Bettiah. The application is dismissed. The petitioner may take recourse of civil forum for redressal of his grievance. It is made clear that this order will not prejudice the petitioner in any manner in any other appropriate proceeding. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)