IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.22331-M of 2010 Date of Decision:18.4.2011 Ajay Pal Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. H.S. Rakhra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Brar, A.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of appropriate directions to the official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the behest of the private respondent. Reply filed by the State is taken on record. Copy thereof has been handed over to the counsel opposite. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the reply filed by the State, he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the Senior Superintendent of Police, Bathinda for the said relief. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. However, in case the petitioner files an application seeking protection to his life and liberty, the concerned SSP shall look into the same and take necessary measures in accordance with law, if need be. 18.4.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE