1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9349 OF 2009 Carestream Health India Pvt.ltd. ..Petitioner V/s The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents Mr.Jitendra Jain with Mr.J.Singhvi for the Petitioner. Mr.V.S.Masurkar, Govt.Pleader for State. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO & J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE: 16th November, 2009. P.C.: 1. There appears to be the dispute of the petitioner with Respondent No.2 as to the valuation of the goods for the purpose of payment of octroi. According to the petitioner, the Respondent No.2 has already taken invoice value and the petitioner has paid octroi on the same. 2. On the other hand, it is submitted on behalf of Respondent No.2 that the MRP of the goods is over Rs.10 lakhs and therefore they have right to demand additional octroi. 2 3. We do not propose to decide the controversy. It will be open to Respondent No.3, within seven days from today, to serve the notice on the petitioner. Petitioner to file reply, if any, within four days thereafter. The Commissioner thereafter, within seven days to take a decision in accordance with law after hearing the petitioner. If the order to be passed by the Commissioner is adverse, then the petitioner may take steps as per the law. 4. With the above observations, petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.H.BHATIA, J.)