IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 20TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 29TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 28907 of 2010(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MARIA AUGUSTINE, D/O.M.L.AUGUSTINE AGED 22 YEARS, MUNDANMANY HOUSE, PUTHUPARAMBU, CHALAKKUDY 680 307, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BASIL A.G. RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY PRIYADARSHINI HILLS PO, KOTTAYAM 686 001 REPRESENTED BY REGISTRAR. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY PRIYADARSHINI HILLS PO, KOTTAYAM 686 001. BY S.C. SHRI T.A. SHAJI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.28907 of 2010-K - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 20th day of September, 2010. JUDGMENT The petitioner was a student of B.Tech (Engineering) during 2006- 2010 in M.A. College, Kothamangalam. She had completed the 8th Semester in Electrical and Electronics Engineer (EEE). She has passed all the other seven semester examinations. Ext.P1 is the copy of the mark sheets of the petitioner in respect of semesters 1 to 7 and Ext.P2 is the copy of the mark sheet in respect of the 8th semester which shows that the petitioner failed in the paper “Instrumentation”. As per Ext.P3, the petitioner applied for revaluation of the failed paper. Herein, the prayer is for a direction to the University to complete the revaluation as sought for in Ext.P3 application. 2. Heard learned Standing Counsel for the University. It is submitted that sufficient time may be granted to complete the revaluation and inform the result to the petitioner 3. There will be a direction to the University to complete the revaluation and inform the result to the petitioner within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, if the application wpc 28907/2010 2 and the payment of fee are in order and if the petitioner complied with all other formalities. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/