IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19219 of 2010 PANKAJ SINGH, S/O RAM PRATAP SINGH, R/O MOHALLA-HAJIPUR, PIPRA, P.S. BARAUNI, DISTRICT-BEGUSARAI. -PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, 2. POONAM DEVI, W/O PANKAJ SINGH, D/O CHHOTAN MAHTO AT PRESENT RESIDING AT VILLAGE AND P.S. FULBARIA, WARD NO.4, DISTRICT- BEGUSARAI. --OPP.PARTIES 3 04.08.2010 Heard Mr. Binod Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Arvind Kumar Pandey, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, and Mr. Dashrath Mahto, learned counsel for opposite party no.2, the complainant. Petitioner is named accused and husband of the complainant and during the course of argument learned counsels submitted that the couple intends to resume and continue the marital life with all honour and dignity and the complainant is ready to go with the petitioner and reside there with him. Petitioner is also ready to do so. Considering the facts and circumstances, on 18th August, 2010 the petitioner and opposite party no.2 shall appear before the court below with a joint petition of 2 compromise stating their intentions, as submitted here, affixing a pair photograph. On that event, the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court below in Complaint Case no. 2114 C of 2008 and the couple shall be permitted to go to the place of petitioner and the court below shall have regular watch for a reasonable period and on the dates fixed parties shall be physically present there and report about their well beings and thereafter the court may pass appropriate order considering the facts and circumstances. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad