IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 378 of 2008 (M/B) Sachidanand ……..….…….Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. ………………Respondents Sri Vipul Painuly, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State-respondents. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Sri Vipul Painuly, Advocate, present for the petitioners. Sri M.A. Khan, Brief Holder, present for the State-respondents. (2) Sri M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State-respondents, makes a statement that after completion of investigation, no offence is said to have been made out against the petitioner-Sachidanand. A short counter affidavit has also been filed to this effect by the Investigating Officer stating that final report has been submitted on 20.05.2008. (3) In view of the above development, this writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous with the observation that the interim order dated 21.05.2008, passed by this Court, shall continue till the final report /police report is received by the court concerned. (Dharam Veer, J.) (Prafulla C.Pant, J.) 16.07.2008 NS