C.R. No.2640 of 2002 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.2640 of 2002 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.08.2009 Ranbir Singh and others .....Petitioners Versus Dharambir Singh Malik and others ...Respondents Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate for the respondents. 2. C.R. No.1080 of 2003 Dharamvir Malik .....Petitioner Versus Hari Ram and others ...Respondents Present: Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondents. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1. Both the civil revisions are between the same parties and in respect of same subject matter. The Civil Revision No.2640 of 2002 is against an order appointing a receiver for harvesting the crops which existed at that time. The civil revision filed against such an order in the year 2002 shall have no further relevance after such a length of time. In my view, the civil revision ought to be dismissed as C.R. No.2640 of 2002 (O&M) -2- infructuous having regard to the nature of relief that was sought in so far as it concerned with the harvest of crop, which ought to have been done by the person in whose favour the judgment is rendered and it shall abide by the directions of the trial Court at the time of final disposal of suit. 2. As regards the Civil Revision No.1080 of 2003, the trial Court had dismissed the application for injunction on the ground that the plaintiff had not established his prima facie case. The Appellate Court affirmed the judgment. I do not propose to dwell at the merits of the order, having regard to the fact that the case of the year 2003 would only require to be disposed of as expeditiously as possible, if it is not done already. The civil revision No.1080 is dismissed. The trial Court is requested to take up the case and disposed it of within a period of six months from the date of receipt of copy of the order. 3. The civil revisions are disposed of as such. No costs. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 18, 2009 Pankaj*