3^" -^II^K^^, ^Tn<^4i<o, fsioi'yy NINdl **<!<*» •^ 200 3n^?T 13RTO ( llic<^<^) ^TT^T ^T f<^ich ^[8H ^TT^T 5ti*ll<^ '^nW^feT^TT^T <=M^f<n<fli ^i<4<?iT ^f^fe^t <f^^i< ^>3^THa^?T SB ; HON»BLBSHRI W.l U JUSThCE: .P.(227l N0. DHIRENDRA MISHRA 1974 OF 2008 PETITIONER (Claimant) RESPONDENTS Versbs 2. 4. Sint Ragini Sahu, Wd/o Late Mahesh Kumar Sahu, Aged about 25 years, R/o Jorapara Kaipm', Tehsil & District C.G. Devendra Singh, S/o Mangal Singh Panjabi, R/o TeUbandha Raipm- C.G. (Dnver of fhe vehicle truck No. C.G.07-C 2221) (Non-applicaaat) Kashmira Suigh S/'o Arjun Singh R/o Plont No. 28/1305 Mouiipara .Telibandha kaipur C.G. (Owner ofthe vehicle No. C.G.07- C 2221) (Non-applicant) Natioual InsLuance Company Ltd. Through Divisioual Maiiager, G,E, Road Raipur C,G. (Insurer of vehicle Truck No. C.G.07-C 2221) (Non-applioaiat) Basant Kumar Sahu, Aged 45 years, S/oLate Itwari Lal Sahu (Claimant) Smt, AnnapLirna Dai Sahu, Aged 44 years, W/o Basant Kumar j Sahu (Claimant) ":%?J ^•^ ^n^rjRT^icb WT3TI^r ^WF 3:E;q'?!rFH^pT, yiTn-M^Ko, (si^i'yy NINdl sbNlcb' -^ 200 31?^W ^^K (licl^<^) '^iTW^f^n 3?n^r 3.4.2008 Shri Satyendra Sahu, By this petition under| India, the petitioner has iaij passed by learned Principa^ Raipur whereby application amount of compensation dej witfa Claim Case No.21/06, Learned counsel for tit Rs.4,71,000/- has been dep<| of the petitioner as per Awa^d Case No. 21/06. The petitio4ei for the purposes of purchasifi into an agreement with the of Rs.20,000/- by way of said agreement the balancej months from the date of application for withdrawal Tribunal annexing the copyj CM^(<rt<fll iTR^Tf ^* fe^ <F3l^l< "^ ^tRpr 3?n^?r Both NA 4 8& 5 R/o Jorapara, Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur C.G. c|ounsel for the petitioner. Article 227 of the Constitution of |)ugned tlie order of Aniiexure P/1 Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, |of the petitioner for release of the fcosited iii her favour in connection been rejected. 1-las [e petitioner submits that a sum of >sited in Fixed Deposit in the name dated 7.7.2006 passed m Claim |ier requires a sum ofRs. 3,00,000/- isifig a house. She has already entered )wner of tiie house and paid a sum ac^vance and as per conditions of the amount is to be paid within. three a^reement The petitioner moved an t>f Rs.3,00,000/- before the Claims of the agreement for sale, In the 5H^^ ^N S^k^^^W^WN —FS/59— 8/2007 —30,000. ^n^r^ ^jch ^PF ^ 3^r^T2n^T, ?s»Tn^<i(o, fsioi^y NINdl ^RWEF' -^ 200 3iii?r TOR^ (^cif^^) ^wi^R «f^a3=n^T said proceedings, statement| owner of the house were rec^ rejected by tlie impugned It is further submitted that the owner ofthe house afteh: registry. |of the petitioner as weU as that of t>rded, however, the appUcation was dated 4.1.2008 (Annexure P/l). payment may be made directly to k due documentation at fhe tiaie of or<der tbe subilaission In view of above petitioner, takiag into consi{ withdrawal of the amount is the petition is allowed anc producing the authenticated| sale deed to be subniitted registration, before the cl^ims release an amount of Rs.SJ favour ofthe petitioner/claitaant her na.me in claini case No. cr)i^I<yt<fli iTFT^ff "^ 'ft^t ^[^R ^^tRpT31T^T of learned counsel for the peration fhe purpose for which the sought.by the petitioner/claimant it is directed that on petitioner documents ofsale Le, dulv drafted jbefore the concerned Registrar for iims Tribunal, the Tribunal shaU j00,000/- (Rs, Three Lakh only) in from the amount deposited in !1/06 in the Bank.— Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ^ff^s ^^ ^pm^, ^sRi^ri^ —LFS/59— 8/2007—30,000: