IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN TUESDAY, THE 10TH MAY 2011 / 20TH VAISAKHA 1933 WP(C).No. 13085 of 2011(I) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- MS.ASWATHIKRISHNAN.K.M,(MINOR), D/O.KRISHNAN, RESIDING AT KARINGATTIYIL HOUSE, ERAVATTOOR.P.O, PERAMBRA (VIA), KOZHIKODE-673525, REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OMANA, AGED 43 YEARS, W/O.KRISHNAN RESIDING AT KARINGATTIYIL HOUSE, ERAVATTOOR.P.O, KOZHIKODE. BY ADVS. SRI.T.RAMPRASAD UNNI, SMT.SMITHA GEORGE. RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION "SIKSHA KENDRA", 2, COMMUNITY CENTRE, PREET VIHAR, DELHI-110 301, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR. 2. THE REGIONAL OFFICER, CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, PLOT NO.1630-A, J BLOCK, ANNA NAGAR, CHENNAI-600 040. BY ADV.SHRI.DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.K.MOHANAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C) No.13085 of 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 10th day of May, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a person who had applied for the All India Pre-Medical/Pre-Dental Entrance, Examination 2011, conducted by the 1st respondent. According to the petitioner, from the Website of the respondents, it is seen that she had secured a total marks of 414 and thus according to her, she being a candidate belonging to Scheduled Tribe, she is eligible to participate in the final examination, since the cut mark needed is only 320 for the candidates belonging to Scheduled Tribe. 2. The petitioner approached this Court by filing the above writ petition which came up for admission on 06.05.2011, and on that date, the standing counsel for the respondents was directed to get instructions and accordingly, the case was adjourned to this date. The standing counsel on instructions submitted that, in fact, the petitioner had obtained only 134 marks and Ext.P2 is the mark list issued by the respondents. According to the learned standing counsel, Ext.P1 is not reliable. W.P(C) NO.13085 OF 2011(I) -: 2 :- 3. In the light of the above submission made by the learned standing counsel for the respondents, especially considering the fact that Ext.P3 is pending before the 1st respondent, I am of the view that this Court need not go into the merits of the claim of the petitioner and the counter claim of the respondents, but on the other hand, this writ petition can be disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P3 request and dispose of the same and communicating the result thereon, to the petitioner. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to take up Ext.P3 request, and to consider the same and pass appropriate orders and accordingly, convey the orders thereon to the petitioner, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, which will be produced by the petitioner. Sd/- V.K.MOHANAN JUDGE //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE krj