1 39 wp.1380.10 ndm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1380 OF 2010 M/s. Siddhi Vinayak Construction. ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and anr. ... Respondents ----- Mr. Amarendra Mishra for the Petitioners. Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the State. ----- CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR and U.D. SALVI, JJ. DATE : 23 rd August, 2010. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2 The relief claimed in this petition is to pursue direction to Respondent No.1 – Anti Corruption Bureau to return the original copies of documents, records and files seized from the office of the Respondent No.2 to be returned to the Petitioner or the Respondent No.2 - Slum Rehabilitation Authority. 3 The learned APP submits that the investigation with regard to 2 39 wp.1380.10 the offence pertaining to Forgery, Cheating and Prevention of Corruption Act is kept in abeyance and the original copies of the documents would be required, if the same is to be taken forward to its logical end. The Respondent No.1, however, is willing to furnish attested copies of the said documents to the Petitioner so that the petitioner would be free to pursue such other remedy as may be available to him in accordance with law. The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner will be content even with the attested copies of the original documents in possession of Respondent No.1, which were seized from the office of Respondent No.2. In view of the arrangement agreed upon, no further order is warranted in the present case. Petition is disposed of with observations that Respondent No.1 shall furnish attested copies of the original documents in his possession at the expenses of the Petitioner within two weeks from the date of receipt of the formal application from the Petitioner to supply the named documents. [ U.D. SALVI, J ] [ A.M. KHANWILKAR, J ]