HIGH COURT OF CHHATTWGARH AT BILASPUR W’I‘it Petitioii (S) L *0. 2890 of Ziws i PETITIONERS 1. Lakhan Lal Patel, S/o Shri Dalap Sngh Patel, aged x about 46 vcars, Assistant Teacher, Government Primay School, Lodhajhar, Block Kharsia, District Raigarh (CG). 2. Chhaliya Das Vaishnav, S/o Shri Kadaxp Das Vaishnav, aged about 46 vcars Assistant Teacher; ‘Government Primary Sol-tool: Navagaon, Block Raigarh, DistL Raigarh (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS . State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Educatmn Department. DKS Bhawan. Raipur (CG). . The Assistant Commissioner Txibal & Welfare Department. Raigarh (CG). 3. District Educatiotl Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh (CG). Block Education Officer, Kharsia, District Raigarh (CG). . Block Education OElcer, Raigarh, Distiict Raigarh (CG). (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTTON OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present : Shri Anjl Mourya, Advocate fer the petitioners. Miss Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORAL ORDFR (Passed on 13‘“ day “time, 2963) With the consent of the parties, tlze matter is taken up for hearing hilally. 1. The petitioners were appointed as Assistant Teachers on fixed pay of Rs. 150/—. Aher completion oftwo years of probation peiiod, they were granted regular pay scale. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in the case is asto whether, the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale W.e.f. the date initial appointment or after completion of probation period. . The issue involved, herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89. (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of MP. & others), wherein it was held \ \_\\ that the, similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale \\ / / / . (j9 ’0 w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to Hon‘ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) N0. 6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon‘ble Supreme Ceurt upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from date of initial appointment. 3. In View of the above stated submissions made by learned counsel for the paities, the Wiit petition is disposed of in the same terms i.e. the petitioners are granted liberty to make a representation, if so advised, to consider their case, ifthey stand on the same footings as per order dated 24.08.1992 by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur, in 0A. No. 2745 of 89 Madhukant Yadu (supra) and subsequently confirmed by order dated 03.01.1994 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93 and grant relief accordingly. 4. In View of the foregoing, this petition is disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- l Satish K. Agnihotri 'Judge