1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO.44 OF 2006 Smt. Arcanj Fernandes alias Mandrekar .... Petitioners Vs. The Deputy Collector & SDO of Pernem, Pernem – Goa & Ors. .... Respondents Shri Nigel Da Costa Frias for the Petitioner. Shri S.S. Kantak, Advocate General, with Ms K. Chodankar, AGA, for the Respondent Nos.1, 3 & 4. CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & N.A. BRITTO, JJ. DATED: FEBRUARY 20, 2006 P.C: The learned Advocate General states that the concerned authorities have already initiated necessary action in relation to the complaint made by the petitioner. Even show cause notice under the Land Revenue Code has been issued and this fact has already been intimated to the petitioner and even the petitioner can put forth her say before the concerned authorities. We accept the said statement. In view of the same, the learned Advocate for the petitioner craves leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the Court afresh, if the occasion arises. Accordingly, while accepting the 2 statement on behalf of the respondents, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn with the said liberty and accordingly stands disposed of. (N.A. Britto, J.) (R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.) sjs/220wp44.6