5. wp 8717-11.doc RMA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8717 OF 2011 Deepak Rajaram Kokil .. Petitioner Vs The Commissioner, Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation & Anr .. Respondents Mr. R.S. Apte, Sr. Advocate i/b Mr. Amol. A Deshpande & Mr. P.A. Gokhale for the Petitioner Mr. D.R. More & Mr. Dilip Shinde for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP for Respondent No. 3 CORAM : D. D. SINHA & SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ DATE : 20th OCTOBER, 2011. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Corporation. 2. The Writ Petition is directed against the impugned notices dated 30th May 2011 and 20th September 2011 issued by Corporation under Section 53 of The Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (in short 'M.R.T.P. Act') for removal of unauthorized structure / development. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present Writ 1 5. wp 8717-11.doc Petition with liberty to apply for permission under Section 44 of the M.R.T.P. Act within three weeks from today as stipulated under sub-section 3 of Section 53 of the M.R.T.P. Act. The petitioner undertakes to fulfill the eligibility criteria for regularization stipulated in Rule 6 of Maharashtra Land Development Plan Rules of 1970. 3. In the circumstances, the Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. So far as grant of protection to the petitioner is concerned, sub-section 3 of Section 53 of M.R.T.P. Act is self explanatory. [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J ] [ D. D. SINHA, J ] 2 5. wp 8717-11.doc 3