IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43553 of 2009 Tarun Paswan, son of Late Sathu Paswan, resident of Village-Chanipur, P.S.-Goraul, District- Vaishali. ………Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ……………………..Opposite Party. ----------- 5. 12. 04. 2010. Heard Mr. Shyam Sundar Sinha “Shyam” learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Shiv kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant as also Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection CI 3352/08/Tr. No. 2977/09 registered under Sections 379 and 498 A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. In compliance of order dated 01. 04. 2010, a compromise petition on behalf of petitioner and Opposite Party No. 2 has been filed today in the Court. Let it be kept on the record. When the matter was taken up on 09. 04. 2010, the petitioner and Opposite Party No. 2 were physically present in the Court and were duly identified by their respective counsels. As per terms of compromise, petitioner and Opposite Party No. 2 have decided to restore their matrimonial relationship. The petitioner and Opposite Party No. 2 have happily returned to their home and have decided to live as legally wedded husband and wife. The petitioner has also undertaken to provide her all dignity and comforts. In the aforesaid background, in the event of his 2 arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from today, petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with CI 3352/08/Tr. No. 2977/09, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. and subject to a further condition that petitioner and Opposite Party No. 2 shall comply the terms of compromise referred to above. Non-compliance of terms of compromise would be construed as misuse of privilege of bail and consequences shall follow. However, if good relationship between the petitioner and Opposite Party No. 2 continues for some longer period, then they shall be at liberty to file a petition in the court below for disposing of the criminal case by taking into consideration compromise arrived at between the parties. m.p. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)