1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 3020 of 2008 Ms Suryakanta v. MC and ors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr I.S. Charlewar, Adv for petitioner Mr M.K. Pathan, Adv for R-1 Mr A.S. Fulzele, AGP for R-2 Mr R.D. Wakode, Adv for R-3 Coram: D.D. Sinha and A.P. Bhangale, JJ Dated : 6th July 2009 1. Heard Mr I.S. Charlewar, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr M.K. Pathan, learned counsel for respondent no.1; Mr A.S. Fulzele, learned AGP for respondent no.2 and Mr R.D. Wakode, learned counsel for respondent no. 3. 2. Grievance of the petitioner is that as per the proclamation, the candidate was eligible to be appointed as Anganwadi Sevika provided she is resident of the same ward. It is contended that in the instant case, respondent no.3 is not the resident of ward no. 17, however, was appointed as Anganwadi Sevika in the said ward. Learned counsel for respondent no.3 disputes these aspects and states that respondent no. 3, in fact, is resident of ward no. 17. 2 3. In the circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to make representation to the Competent Authority for redressal of her grievance. Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed for. If the representation is made within ten days from today, we expect the Competent Authority to dispose of the representation at the earliest. All issues raised in the petition are kept open. Judge. Judge. hsj 3