I§_B,E,_,§_!:!,HATTISGARH : BILASPU SINGLE BENCH : HON’BLE SHRI S.R.'NAYAK, CJ. WRIJ‘ PETITEQN Np. 621 1 QF 2005 .ETI..ON.R. 1 . Mahesfi Kumar, aged about 32 years, 8/0. Shri Jagprasad Soni, R/o. Baloda, Tehsil-Janjir District Janjgir—Champa (C.G.) Rakesh Soni; S/e. Shri Jagprasad Soni, aged about 28 years, R/o. Shyam Bazar‘ Baloda, Tehsil Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa (C-GJ ' Smt. Heera Devi, W/o, Jagprasad Soni, R/o. Baloda, Tehsil Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) x RESPOiQQENT The tate-of Chhattisgarh, through Coiiector, Districi Janjgir-Champa (CG) Sub Divisicnai Officer/Competent Auihority (Land Acquisitien Officer ' i District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ' Pre$ent : ' $hri Sunil Otwéni, iearned counsel for thé petitieners. ‘V Shri Pra$hant Mishra, learned Addi. A.G. with Shri Yashwant Singh, iearned G.A.f9.r- the State. Shri VR. Tiwari, learned counsel for the intervener. (ORAL ORDER) (Passed ori 16‘“ February, 2006) At the tirhe of Hearingr Shri Prashant Mishra,‘ learned Addl. Advocate General breught to notice of the Court that the 2nd respondent.— S‘ub DiVisional Officer/Competent Authority (Land Acquisition Officer), District Janjgir—Champa has already-paseed the final Verder under the. hihattisgarhUnderground:Pipelines (Acquisitién (if Right of User in, andmct, 2004 (fer short ‘the Act’) on, 26.02.2005. ln this writ petition, the g main relief sought bythe petitioners is to direct the 2““ respondent not to i g ; s ' S ) C L carryout any digging or construction over the land without following the ‘ provisicm ef the Act. (2) Learned counse! fer the petiticners would submit that though r the final order is paseed by the 2“ respendent en 26.02.2005, he did net toiiew the procedure prescribed under the Act. There is rte need for the Court to appreciate and record tinding on the above eubmission of the 1 teamed ceunee! for the petitioners. if that ie the case, it is permiesibie for j the petitionere to urge that ground also while aesailing the validity of the : order made by the 2nd respondent en 26.02.2005 in appropriate ‘, independent legal action. Reserving libertyto the petitioners to assail the validity of the order made by the 2“ respondent dated 26.02.2005 and leaving open al! the contentione raised in this writ petition to be agitated at an appropriate etage, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Sdl-