IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DECEMBER 2008 / 26TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 RP.No. 1349 of 2008(M) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.29522/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- K.K. JAYAN, S/O. KRISHNANKUTTY NAIR, KUNNEL HOUSE, P.O. IDIVANNA, NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURM. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- R.P.1349/2008 in W.P.(C).29522/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 17th day of December, 2008 ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner Mr.K.V.Gopinathan Nair submits that the subsisting grievance is only regarding the direction in the judgment, to the respondent to convene a timing conference and settle the timings in accordance with the timing priority maintained in the office of the second respondent. I take note of the fact that detailed directions have been issued by this Court to the Government in Writ Petition No.30238/2008 and connected cases as to the manner in which the application for revision of timings shall be dealt with in the office of the RTA, Malappuram. In view of the said directions, the judgment in question is reviewed and it is directed that the second respondent shall deal with the petitioner's application for revision of grant of fresh permit in the light of the directions issued in the aforementioned judgment. Review petition is disposed of as above. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs