1 S.B.Cr.Misc. II Bail App. No. 2854/2008 (Smt. Jaanki Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 29/05/2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. Vishwajeet Joshi for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor. Mr. Ravindra Acharya for the complainant. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State as also counsel appearing for the complainant. Perused the order impugned and challan papers. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that some of the similarly situated co-accused have been granted bail. Learned counsel further submits that though the presence of the petitioner has been shown at the place of occurrence but no specific overt act has been assigned to her. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the similarly situated co-accused have been granted bail and no specific overt act has been assigned to the present petitioner and the petitioner being a lady, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. 2 Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Smt. Jaanki w/o Ramkunwar be released on bail in FIR No. 86/2007 P.S. Merta Road, district Nagaur, provided she executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for her appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP