IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R. S. A. No. 4127 of 2004 (O&M) Date of decision : May 16, 2008 State of Haryana and others ....Appellants versus Lajwanti ....Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pritam Pal Present : Mr. Imma Singh Kang, DAG Haryana Mr. GS Bawa, Advocate, for respondent Pritam Pal,J. (Oral) This regular second appeal by defendants-State of Haryana and others is directed against judgment and decree dated 21.8.2000 passed by learned trial court, whereby a suit filed by plaintiff-respondent, Lajwanti (widow) was decreed in respect of khasra no. 422 (0-3), 423 (0-7) total area measuring 10 Marlas, as described in the head note of the plaint, where she had raised her residential house after purchasing the same through registered sale deed dated 22.12.1976. After taking water and electricity connection bearing Account No. C-313, she has been residing in the same house since 1976. Besides that, she is also shown to be owner in possession of this house in the Municipal record. Thereafter appeal filed by the defendants-State was also dismissed vide judgment and decree dated 12.3.2004 passed by learned first appellate court. This is how feeling aggrieved, the State has come up in this appeal. R. S. A. No. 4127 of 2004 (O&M) -2- Both the courts below have given concurrent findings that the defendant-State, in fact, has been wrongly shown to be owner in the revenue record of the aforesaid property. A perusal of the impugned judgments and decrees goes a long way to show that there is nothing perverse or unreasonable in the concurrent findings arrived at by the courts below. Besides that a similar RSA No. 870 of 2005 filed by the State of Haryana has already been dismissed by this Court vide order dated 3.3.2005, this fact could not be disputed by learned State counsel. Moreover, learned State counsel could not make out any substantial question of law in this appeal for consideration by this Court. Hence, this appeal is dismissed. ( Pritam Pal ) May 16, 2008 Judge 'dalbir'