HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P.(S) No. 2933 of 2008' Smf. Rangina Choubey, W/o Shri Ravishankar Pe‘ri‘rioner' Choubey, aged about 54 years, Assis’ran‘r 1 Teacher, Governmen‘r Boys Primary School, Pa’rgawan, Block— Pendr‘a, Disfr‘icf— Bilaspur, (C.G.) Versus Respondem‘s 1. STaTe of Chha‘r’risgarh, Through Secretary, . Educafion Deparfmenf, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Dis’rric’r Educm‘ion Officer, Bilaspur (C.G.) r 3. Block Educm‘ion Officer, Pendra, Disfricf - Bilaspur (C.G.) SB: Hon‘ble Mr. Jusfice Satish K. Agnihofri, J Shri Dhirendra Mishra, Advocafe for ’rhe pe’ri’rioner. Miss Sunifa Jain, Panel Lawyer for The respondem‘s. ORAL ORDER (Passed on ihis 17” Day of June, 2008) .'Wifh ’rhe consem‘ of Iearned counsel appearing for fhe parfies, ’rhe maffer is heard finally. .Learned counsel appearing for ’rhe pe’rifioner submifs That The pefifioner was appoinfed a‘s Depu’ry Teacher in The year 1981 on fixed pay of Rs. 150/—. Affer complefion of probafion period, fhe pefifioner was granfed regular pay scale. He further submifs fhaf fhe issue involved in fhe case is as’ro whefher fhe pe’rifioner is enfifled fo regular pay scale w.e.f. fhe dafe of inifial appoin’rmenf or offer complefion of proba‘rion period. .— ’L/ 3. The issue involved, herein was considered by’f‘he Madhya Pradesh Sfg’re Adminisfr‘a’rive Tribuhal, Jabalpur‘ in O.A. No. 2745/39 (Mudhukunf Vadu and 56 oThers Vs. S‘rafe of M.P. & o’rher‘s), whereineif was held \ L Thu? The slmllarly . . sufua’red . ‘ Teachers ‘ are L enTI‘Hed ' To regular pay scule I w.e.f, fhe da?e of inijrial appoin’rmen’r. The maHer was Taken-up 1‘0 ’rhe Hon'ble Supreme Cour'rfThe appeal was dismisSed by fhe Hon‘ble Supreme Court upholdmg The deaslon of The Tribunal To The effecT ThaT The Teachers/ASSIsTanT Teachers are enTITled To regular pay scale from The daTe’of iniTial oppoinTmenT. 4. In view of Theabove sTaTe submissions made by learned counsei‘for The parTies, The wriT peTiTion is disposed of in The same Terms i.e., The ' peTiTioner is granTed IiberTy To make a represenTaTion, if so adviSed, To consider his case, if he sTands on‘The same fooTings, as per The order daTed 24 8 1992 passed by The Madhya Pradesh STaTe AdmInIsTraTIve Tribunal Jabalpur' m O A No 2745 of 89 (MadhukanT Yadu) (supra) and subsequenTly confirmed by The order daTed 3.1.1994 paSSed by The Hon'ble Supreme CourT in Special Leave PeTiTion (Civil) No. 6892/93 and granT relief accordingly. 5. In View of The foregoing, The peTiTion is disposed of. No order asTo Thakur ) ‘w/ ”Zae, r, \ l Sd/_ l l cosTs. Satlsh K Agmhotrl { T Judge