IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15265 of 2010 MUSMAT SAHODARI DEVI AGED 62 YEARS WIDOW OF LATE BAL MOHAN SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE, RAMNAGAR, P.O. SALASLA, P.S. SONBARSA, DISTRICT BUXAR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, SINCHAI BHAWAN, PATNA. 2. THE DIRECTOR PROVIDENT FUND DIRECTORATE, PANT BHAWAN, PATNA. 3. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, ROHTAS SASARAM. 4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, MECHANICAL, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, OLD SECRETARIAT, BARRACK, PATNA. 5. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION MECHANICAL CIRCLE, GAYA CAMP DEHRI. 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION MECHANICAL DIVISION, DEHRI DISTRICT ROHTAS. 7. THE TREASURY OFFICER, ROHTAS, SASARAM. 8. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, BIRCHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA. ----------- 02. 14.09.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, State as also the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the payment of arrears of pension of her deceased husband as also the unpaid amount of G.P.F. including the revision of family pension and other retiral dues as indicated in paragraphs -1, 2 and 3 of the writ application. 2 In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 6 with a copy to respondent nos. 7 and 8. As regards the claim for payment of G.P.F., petitioner proposes to file a separate representation before the respondent no.3. In view of the above, in case such representations stating details of unpaid claims are filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondents shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and the admitted dues, if any, could also be paid along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)