..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3307 OF 2008 1. Shri.Sayaji Ganpat Botre, 2. Shri.Sanjay Sayaji Botre, & 3. Shri.Raju Sayaji Botre. ..Applicants. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. .... Mr.Nitin Jamdar, Adv. a/w. Mr.Sudhakar G. Thorat, Adv. for the applicants. Mr.K.V.Saste, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 19th September, 2008. DATED : 19th September, 2008. DATED : 19th September, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicants and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking anticipatory bail in C.R.No.159 of 2008 of Chakan Police Station. The said case is mainly under Section 326 of IPC. 3. It is the prosecution case that the applicants assaulted Manoj, Ganesh and Kantram. Applicant No.1 assaulted by kick blows and fist blows, applicant No.2 assaulted by iron rod and ..(2).. applicant No.3 assaulted with stone. As stated earlier, three persons are injured in the incident. As per the medical certificate, it appears that all three persons have sustained grievous injuries. 4. The learned Advocate for the applicants states that it is a family dispute and cross-cases have been filed. The case filed by applicant No.1 is under Section 307 of IPC. The learned APP states that in the said, the accused persons have been granted bail. 5. Looking to the material on record and the injury certificates, I do not think that this is a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the applicants. Application for anticipatory bail is rejected. 6. On the request of the learned Advocate for the applicants, the applicants are granted time to surrender till 25th September, 2008. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)