THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL PETITION No.9736 of 2010 ORDER: This is a petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. with a prayer to quash the private complaint in S.R.No.279 of 2010 on the file of the IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, Kukatpally at Miyapur, insofar as the petitioners-accused Nos.1, 2, 5 and 6. The case of the petitioners-accused is that on the basis of a report given by the 1st respondent/de facto complainant alleging that on the intervening night of 15/16.08.2007, at about 1.15 PM, while he (the de facto complainant) and two others, namely S.Ravi Shankar Reddy and S.Panduranga Reddy, were sleeping in his house, the petitioners-accused Nos.1 and 2 along with a driver knocked the door and when he opened the door, they forcibly took him and S.Ravi Shankar Reddy in their Tata-Sumo vehicle to the Inspector of Police, Central Crime Station, Cyberabad, and beat him causing injury to his right hand, a case in Crime No.226 of 2007 on the file of Police Station, Balanagar, was registered against them for the offence punishable under Sections 342 and 331 read with 34 of I.P.C. and, after investigation, a final report was filed by the police stating that no offence as alleged has been made out. It appears that, subsequently, when a notice intimating issuance of such final report was issued, the 1st respondent/de facto complainant filed protest petition against the petitioners- accused and four others and the same was numbered as S.R.No.279 of 2010 on the file of the IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, Kukatpally at Miyapur, for the offence punishable under Sections 342 and 331 read with Section 34 of IPC. It appears that during pendency of S.R.No.279 of 2010 before the Court below, the parties have entered into compromise and as such the present petition is filed with a prayer to quash the proceedings in the said case. The parties are present. When questioned, the 1st respondent/de facto complainant stated that he is no more interested in further prosecuting the matter and the proceedings in S.R.No.279 of 2010 before the Court below may be quashed. In the light of the statement made by the 1st respondent/de facto complainant, this Court is of the view that the proceedings in S.R.No.279 of 2010 before the Court below can be quashed only insofar as petitioners-accused Nos.1, 2, 5 and 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in S.R.No.279 of 2010 on the file of the IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, Kukatpally at Miyapur, are quashed against the petitioners-accused Nos.1, 2, 5 and 6. ________________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J 29th September 2010 CVRK