IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 15TH JANUARY 2010 / 25TH POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 1025 of 2010(C) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MANAGER, R.M.HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL ALOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.KRB.KAIMAL, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.ANIL K.NAIR SRI.B.UNNIKRISHNA KAIMAL SRI.T.ISSAC RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SSECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KERALA GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION THRISSUR. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER IRINJALAKUDA. 4. SHRI.E.GEORGE PAUL H.S.A (HINDI) UNDER SUSPENSION R.M.H.S.S. ALOOR, RESIDING AT EDAPPILLY HOUSE DEEPTHI BHAVAN, THRISSUR 680 672. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. T.T. MEHAMOOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 1025 of 2010 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 15th day of January, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is the manager of an aided school. The 4th respondent is a High School Assistant (Hindi) in the said school. He was suspended for 15 days by Ext. P1 order. The 3rd respondent conducted a preliminary enquiry and issued Ext. P2 order permitting continuance of suspension beyond 15 days. According to the petitioner, thereafter, the 2nd respondent has issued Ext. P4 order without hearing the complainant or his father directing reinstatement of the 4th respondent expressing the opinion that there is no evidence to prove the charge against the 4th respondent. Against the same, the petitioner has filed Ext. P5 revision before the 1st respondent. The petitioner seeks a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P5 as expeditiously as possible. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P5 revision petition filed by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being head to the petitioner, the 4th respondent and the father of the complainant. The petitioner may move the 1st respondent for stay, which shall be considered and orders passed within two weeks from the date when the petitioner moves for stay. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.