In the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur WP (227) _ é 9/6 / 2009 Petitioner / Plaintiff Respondents / Defendants / Smt. Jhansirani Barik, 47 Yrs., w/ o B. Barik, Gayatri Nagar, Raipur — thro’ Attorney BR. Barik S/ o Ratanla] Barik ‘ New Subhash Nagar, Tikrapara, Raipur Versus Ravi Gilhare, Sarpanch, Vill. /1. Dhusera, Teh. Abhanpur, Distt. Raipur . Pramod Shukla, 40 Yrs. Smt. Aarti Shukla, 35 Yrs., w/ o Pramod‘ Shukla 2 65‘ 3 R/o — Shiv Sadan, Near Nilayzma Timha, Bandhwapara, Raipur Peririnn Under Art. 227 of the Constitution of India WWWCW)” 6W4 2007 WW (WET) WWRIPC»w)Né¥/é .~ 200 t? mam W (Wu) 1 Kvr af¥irmed by the appgilate Court, and thus, both the Courts beiow' have not cemmitted any “legality o material irreguiarity warranting interference by this Court in exerci‘se of powers conferred upen §t under Articke 227 of the Constitution 3f indie. it is weii settied principie of iaw that this Court, in exercise of its supervisory jurisdiwtion under Articte 227 of the Constitution of india, should re in from interfering with the order passed by the Court belo Except in such cases where perversity, iiiegaiity, irregularity jurisdictionat error is writ iarge on the face of the record, w ich is not in the present case. The petition has no merit nd the same is accordingly dismissed on admission stage. However, the trial Court s ali proceed with the case in accordance with iaw without bei g infiuenceci by any opinion expressed by this Court in this order 7/“ rk/ E X. _ f a r . 7 anaemia; mm . With-crane ’ , smimiwmerteam t . $WW prooerty by the opposite party. The said order has rightly