^ ^ -^ f 3^ s BEFORE THE HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(Cr.)No.^<^v'''~ /2011 Petitioner ...K-\ / Suresh KumarSinha, S/o Late KoduramSinha, Aged about 40 years, R/o Village -Raanwa, P.S.-Arjuni, Tehsil & Distt. -Dhamtari (C.G.) Respondents ^-1. State of Chhgttisgarh, through District Magistrate, District- Dhamtari (C.G.) ^ 2. Superintendent of Police Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/2270F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 't^ SII^CT^T' R-ii'* an^r •?h+li<h ^fifl J A- 'S^ -i11'41d'i|, riTil'y'lto, fadl+iy 3TI^T TR^ . M'.&.CG?:.^...^.;.. 2-<2'^2^ ^..-..-n..t...^-^..^....<........ ^gg HWiyfl thllcb fq^a' 13.0&20il1: • - Mr. Adii Minhaj, counsel for Ms.SunitaJain.PLfortheS On the basis of the Q! statements of the witnesses recc Dhamtari and the copy of certif Raanwa, learned counsel for acquittal ofthe petitioner from.ali him, the District IVlagistrate has 19.10.2010 (Annexure P-2) and jurisdiction and, therefore, the on and P-2 deserves to be quashed. orders of acquittal were not bn Magistrate bythe petitioner. In vjew of above, at this the proceedings pen.ding before free to raise the objections proceedings pending before the G ofacquittai before him. With the aforesaid Hberty, V\ stt i chNtc'l^ ^w^i ^ fs^l <Fn^i< '^aipgtisn^r t'ne petitioner. tders of acquittal (AnnexureP-5), jrded before the District Magistrate, ficjate given by the Gram Panchayat, tl|ie petitioner submits t'nat despite t|ie criminal cases registered against issued show cause notice dated thus has acted in excess of its tpers impugned vide Annexures P-1 However, he. admits that the above <buaht to the notice of the District sge, ! am not inclined to intarfere in :he District Magistrate. Petitioner is regarding maintainability of the istrlct Magistrate by filing the orders e petition stands disposed of. Sd/- \ ^K.Agarwal ^ Judge f^tfe^ '-J,\