IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 29TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 10TH PHALGUNA 1929 Crl.MC.No. 511 of 2008() ------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN BA.6606/2006 Dated 14/11/2006 .................... PETITIONER: DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT: --------------------------------- P.MURALEEDHARAN, MURALI NIVAS, KADAMBUR, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. RAMESHAN PUTHALATH, S/O.NARAYANAN NAIR, PUTHALATH HOUSE, AZHIKKODE, KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-31. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, EDAKKAD POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.PUZHAKKARA MUHAMMED THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Crl. M.C. NO. 511 of 2008 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 29-02-2008 ORDER Petitioner who is the de facto complainant in Crime No. 14 of Edakkad Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 452, 341, 427, 424, 307 and 506(ii) read with Sec. 149 I.p.C. seeks to cancel the bail granted to the first accused in the above crime. 2. Altogether there are 8 accused in the above case and the first respondent herein is the first accused. The case was originally taken on file as C.P. No. 19 of 2004 by the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate , Thalassery against all the 8 accused. As per order dated 27-3-2004, the learned Magistrate committed the case against A2 to A8. Since A1 (the first respondent herein) was absconding, the case against him was split up and refiled and subsequently transferred to the L.P. Register as L.P.C. No. 28 of 2004. Some time in the year January 2008, the first accused surrendered before the committal court. Since the investigation was over and there was no reason found by the Magistrate to remand him to judicial custody, he was released on bail. The case against him was refiled as C.P. 4 of 2008 Crl. M.C. NO. 511 of 2008 -:2:- and it is posted for committal. It is not known as to whether the Sessions Case registered pursuant to the committal of A2 to A8 in C.P. 19 of of 2004 has been disposed of or not . If that case is not disposed of yet, then C.P. 4 of 2008, soon after its committal shall also be clubbed along with the Sessions Case arising from C.P. No. 19 of 2004 and disposed of together. If, on the other hand, the Sessions case arising from C.P. 19 of 2004 has already been disposed of, then soon after the committal of C.P. 4 of 2008, that sessions case shall also be either tried by the Sessions Judge himself or made over for trial to the appropriate court for early disposal. With these directions, this Crl.M.C is disposed of. Sd/-V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) ani. /true copy/ Crl. M.C. NO. 511 of 2008 -:3:- Registry shall ascertain whether the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thalassery has disposed of C.P. No. 4 of 2008 against one Ramesan Puthalath and Others by committing the case to the Sessions Court, and, if so, the date on which it was committed. If it is not committed the reason as to why it is not so far committed. Post after one week.