1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1080 OF 2010. SACHIN MORESHWAR MAHANTAGE VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri A. S. Manohar Advocate for the applicant. Shri C. N. Adgokar, APP for State respondent. CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 27th JULY, 2010. 1. Heard. 2. Perused the case diary and statements and other papers. 3. Bail is pressed mainly on the ground that the complainant Lobhesh has filed affidavit before Sessions Court stating that the applicant Sachin Mahantare was named in FIR by mistake. 4. Perusal of statements of all other eye witnesses & victim disclose the name of present applicant. 5. In this background the affidavit of complainant comes under serious suspicion, and this concession needs to be dealt with great caution. 2 6. Therefore, present application for anticipatory bail has no merit. At this stage, it cannot be believed that the applicant may not be guilty, 7. Hence, this application is rejected. Interim order is vacated. Judge //mule//