IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO: 3917 of 1998 Between: 1 Sri Nagarjuna Industrial Engineering Complex, Rep by its Managing Partner B.Phani Raju, S/o Satyanarayana, R/o Palavancha, Khammam District. 2 C.H.Venkat Reddy, S/o Malakonda Reddy, R/o Palvancha , Khammam District. ... PETITIONERS AND 1 Superintending Engineer, Panchayat Raj, Circle, Khammam. 2 Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Nirmal, Adilabad. 3 Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Warangal. 4 Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Red Hills, Hyd. 5 Superintending Engineer, SLBC Circle I & II, G.V.Gudem, Nalgonda. 6 Superintending Engineer, NSP & M Circle, Tekulapally, Khammam. 7 Executive Engineer, IB Division, Khammam. 8 Executive Engineer, Panachayat Raj Division, Kothagudem. 9 Executive Engineer, R & B Division, Kothagudem. 10 Superintending Engineer, Somasila Circle, Nellore. 11 Superintending Engineer, R & B, Warangal. 12 Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Nizamabad. 13 Superintending Engineer, SRSP, LMD Colony, Karimanagr. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or writ one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in insisting upon Earnest Money deposit, Commercial Tax clearance certificate and Experience certificate for issuance of tender Schedules to participate in all tender notices on or after 12.12.97 as arbitrary, illegal, unjust and consequently direct the respondents to follow G.O.Ms.No.178 dt.27.9.97 and issue tender schedules to the petitioners in all tender notices issued by the respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: SMT.N.SHOBA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR IRRIGATION & COMM AREA DEV. The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the subject matter in the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the above submission made by the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. _________________ N.V. RAMANA, J February 21, 2005 MRR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER Copy to: 1 Superintending Engineer, Panchayat Raj, Circle, Khammam. 2 Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Nirmal, Adilabad. 3 Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Warangal. 4 Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Red Hills, Hyd. 5 Superintending Engineer, SLBC Circle I & II, G.V.Gudem, Nalgonda. 6 Superintending Engineer, NSP & M Circle, Tekulapally, Khammam. 7 Executive Engineer, IB Division, Khammam. 8 Executive Engineer, Panachayat Raj Division, Kothagudem. 9 Executive Engineer, R & B Division, Kothagudem. 10 Superintending Engineer, Somasila Circle, Nellore. 11 Superintending Engineer, R & B, Warangal. 12 Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Nizamabad. 13 Superintending Engineer, SRSP, LMD Colony, Karimanagr. 14 Two C.C. s to the GP FOR IRRIGATION & COMM AREA DEV., High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 15 Two C.D. Copies.