IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.23 of 2008 ANIL KUMAR MISHRA, S/O- Shri Sheo Kumar Mishra, Resident of Village-Balirajpur, Police Station Babu Barhi, District-Madhubani. ………………….Petitioner/Appellant. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2.The Secretary, Department of Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.The Director, Department of Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.The Deputy Director, Darbhanga, Division, Darbhanga ……Respondents-Respondents/O.Ps. 5.Shashi Bhushan, S/O-Ayodhya Prasad Sada, Resident of Village-Tilkeshwar, Police Station- Bithan Bazar, District-Darbhanga. ……………..(Petitioner)Appellant-O.P. ----------- 6/ 06.10.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the State. This review petition has been preferred against the judgment and order of the Division Bench dated 8th October, 2007 whereby two letters patent appeals preferred by some others as well as this petitioner were dismissed on account of finding that the appointments were made without advertisement and, therefore, without giving chance of consideration to other eligible person which violates the constitutional mandates. The Division Bench also relied upon the Constitutional Bench decision of the Supreme Court in the case 2 of Uma Devi. On behalf of petitioner it has been submitted that some letters and orders as to under what circumstances the appointments were ordered to be made have not been considered by the Division Bench in the order under review. We find that those materials are not relevant and do not have any impact upon the final outcome of the appeals which have been dismissed for the reasons noticed above. There is no material to counter the finding that the appointments were made without advertisement. In such circumstances this review petition is dismissed as without merit. kksinha/- (Shiva Kirti Singh, ACJ.) ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J. )