}/$-^ ^^^- ^^'^^^ ^•-\y^'^\>- 'y- <'<!^' ^- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BILASPUR rCHHATTISGARHI WMT PETmONrS1No.r= / 2010 S.B, PETmONER:- Ghanshaym Sahu, Age- 41 years, S/0- Shri Mangtu Ram Sahu, By Post -U.T.D. {Upper Division Teacher}, at Govt. Balak Higher Secondary School- Gariyaband, Block Gariyaband, R/0:-Sahu Nivas,Dak Bangala- Gariyanband, Post & Tahsil Gariyaband, Distt. Raipur [Chhattisgarh] -:VERSUSL- RESPONDENTS: - 1. StateofChhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department ofTribal Welfare, D.K.S. Mantralaya Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Asstt. Commissioner, Deptt. OfTribalWelfare, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). 3. Assitant Director[Sahayak Sanchalak], Tresury & Accounts, District - Raipur [C.G.] 4. The Principal, Govt. Balak Higher Secondary School- Gariyaband, BlockGariyaband, District - Raipur [C.G.] WRIT PETITION ITNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE coNSTmmoN OF INDIA FORTHE ISSUANCE QF DIRECTION fS) OR ORDER (S). The above named petitioner most respectfully begs to submit as under: - :l»]nBi'!r ,-^^yEsas -'K^i'^' PETITIONER RESPONDENTS HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.2328 OF 2010 Ghanshayam Sahu Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution oflndia) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri J.A. Lohani, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. ORDERJQRALl (Passed on this 7th day of May, 2010) 1) By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to pay two advance increments from the date of passing of B.T.1. examination, on his own expenses, before entering into service. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the present case is no longer res integra as the same has, been considered and decided by the Supreme Court in Asha Saxena v. StateofM.P. &0rs.\ 3) Learned counsel further submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision in Asha Saxena (supra). Thus, the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to decide his case in the light of aforestated decisions, subject to verification of the facts. 4) Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with law and in the light of the decision of the Supreme Court in Asha Saxena (supra), within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. • 5) In view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 6) Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. amit Satts,J"M^om 3ttdSe ' 2009 (III) MPJR (SC) 59 ~^~MSIS3SSW^S:S^^