1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.7773 OF 2007. PETITION NO.7773 OF 2007. PETITION NO.7773 OF 2007. Geetanjali Dinkar Patil : Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & ors. : Respondents. Mr.Vishal Bodhe i/by Mr.Pramod Patil for the petitioner. Mr.S.R.Nargolkar, AGP, for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Ms.Pooja V.Thorat for Respondent No.3. CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.B.MHASE & S.S.SHINDE, JJ. : S.B.MHASE & S.S.SHINDE, JJ. : S.B.MHASE & S.S.SHINDE, JJ. DATED DATED DATED : APRIL 08, 2008. : APRIL 08, 2008. : APRIL 08, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. It is an admitted position that the petitioner has cancelled his admission after the cut off date. Rule 15 of the Association of Managements of Unaided 2 Private Medical and Dental Colleges, Maharashtra, ASSO-CET 2007 provides that if the admission is cancelled after the cut off date, the student is not entitled for the refund of fees. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he wants to challenge Rule 15. We have repeatedly asked the learned counsel for the petitioner as to what is the challenge to Rule 15. But he was unable to explain. We ourselves have gone through Rule 15. We do not find any illegality or unreasonableness in the Rule 15. Therefore, we refrain to entertain the petition. The petition is accordingly rejected. [S.S.SHINDE, [S.S.SHINDE, [S.S.SHINDE, J] [S.B.MHASE, J] J] [S.B.MHASE, J] J] [S.B.MHASE, J]