IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 10953 of 2011-F. Decided on: December 14, 2011. Roshan Lal, S/O Sh.Ganesh Dutt, age about 47 years, Village Chauri Gharesa, P.O. Thona, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, Himachal Pradesh. Presently working as TGT (NM) at Govt. S.S.S. Thona, Sarkaghat Mandi, H.P. ……….Petitioner. Versus 1. State of H.P. through the Principal Secretary (Education to the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-2. 2. Director of Elementary Education, H.P., Shimla. ……….Respondents. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate, For the respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed mainly with the following prayer:- “A. That this writ petition may kindly be allowed and 3 years service on Tenure Bases followed by regular service may very kindly be counted for the purpose of increments, fixation and pensionary benefits.” 2. According to the petitioner, the issue is covered in his favour by the judgments of this Court rendered in CWP No. 4550 of 2010, Ravi Kumar vrs. State of H.P. & another and LPA 36 of 2010, Sita Ram versus State of Himachal Pradesh & ors. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. The petitioner submits that he would file appropriate representation furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for him to do so. As and when the same is made, the 2 second respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and copies of the judgments, referred to above, by the petitioner before the second respondent. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. December 14, 2011, ( Justice Rajiv Sharma), (karan/vs) Judge.