IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38358 of 2010 RAVI SINGH @ RAVI SHANKAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/- 13.01.2011 Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Nauhatta P.S. Case No.4 of 2010 registered under Sections 341, 342, 379, 384,386 and 504/34 of the I.P.C. Petitioner is named in the First Information Report along with others with allegation that he as well as other accused demanded extortion money from the informant. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the instant case has been brought by the informant on account of land dispute and as a matter of fact, the informant wanted to construct road on the land of petitioner and others, which was protested by the petitioner and other accused. Learned 2 counsel for the petitioner also submits that so far as the criminal antecedents of the petitioner is concerned, all the cases were instituted against the petitioner on account of land dispute. On the other hand, learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposes the prayer and submits that the petitioner and his associates demanded extortion money from the informant. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submission of the parties, above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with above stated Nauhatta P.S. Case No.4 of 2010. Ashwini/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)