Civil Revision No. 5097 of 2009 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 5097 of 2009 Date of Decision: 7.9.2009 Col. T.S. Kalra ......Petitioner Versus Sardara Singh and others .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri Raman K. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral). Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated 27.7.2007, whereby in the third party objections, the learned Executing Court framed an issue for determining the objections raised. The sole ground to challenge the impugned order is that the objector is transferee pendente-lite and, therefore, his rights are not better than the rights of his transferor. As such, the objections do not require any consideration by the Executing Court. The said argument is not tenable for the reason that the petitioner has obtained a money decree. The question whether the transfer is to avoid or delay the execution of the money decree is a question which is required to be determined on the basis of evidence led. Civil Revision No. 5097 of 2009 (2) Thus, I do not find any patent illegality or material irregularity in the impugned order, which may warrant interference by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. Hence, the present petition is dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 7.9.2009 ds