In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh RFA No. 3382 of 2008 (O&M) Honsla Prasad ..... Appellant vs Union Territory, Chandigarh ..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. P. C. Dhiman, Advocate, for the appellant. Rajesh Bindal J. The landowner has filed the present appeal before this court against the award of the learned court below passed under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act') seeking enhancement of compensation for the superstructures existing on the acquired land. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the Union Territory, Chandigarh, vide notification dated 3.7.1997 issued under Section 4 of the Act, acquired land of Villages, namely, Nizampur Burail, Jhumru. The Land Acquisition Collector announced his award on 19.1.2000. The landowners feeling dissatisfied with the amount of compensation awarded by the Collector, filed objections. Aggrieved against the award of superstructures, the landowner filed objections which were referred to the learned Reference Court, who keeping in view the material placed on record by the parties, accepted the same by granting increase of 25% on the compensation on account of acquisition of superstructure as was assessed at PWD rates. It is this order which is impugned in the present appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant fairly conceded that the present appeal is squarely covered by judgment of this court in RFA No. 727 of 2001 Narinder Singh vs Union Territory, Chandigarh, decided on 4.2.2009, whereby this court had upheld the award of the learned court below granting 25% increase on the compensation for acquisition of superstructures at the rate determined by PWD. Since the award of the learned counsel below is in conformity with law laid down by this court in Narinder Singh's case (supra), no case for further enhancement in the compensation is made out. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed. 4.2.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge