1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6922 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 6922 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 6922 OF 2008 Shri Ali Athar Khan Azmi ... Petitioner (Org.Defendant) Vs. The Bombay City Weaver’s Co- operative Society Ltd. ... Respondent (Org. Plaintiff) None for the petitioner. Mr. P.J.Thorat, Advocate, for the respondent. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE: 5th December,2008. DATE: 5th December,2008. DATE: 5th December,2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. None for the petitioner. In the first session also when the matter was called, none was present for the petitioner. The learned Counsel for the respondent is present. 2 2. It appears that on the application of the petitioner, who was defendant before the trial Court,he was allowed to deposit the rent amount and the Court also allowed the plaintiff/respondent to withdraw the amount on condition to refund the amount if it is found excess during the trial and he was also required to file an undertaking to that effect. That order is challenged by the original defendant. In fact, there is no substance in the petition. The petition stands dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)