I / iiberiy. No order asto costs. Sd/_ SRL/xg: Satish K. Agnihom; Judge Wwikbq7 HIGH COURT GF CHHA'TTISGARH AT BILASPUR \u WRIT PETlTiONIS) NQ. 4465 0f2008 PETITIONER : Rameshvvar Singh Nag; S/o Late Shri Sukhudu Ram Nag, agad ahmt 55 years, Saperinteizdaim Mahiia . £3.11. Kanker, Biock ~ Kanker, Disirict Kanker (CG) VERSUS RESPONI)EN’1‘S : i. State 0f Chhatijsgarh Through Secretary? Education Depamiaem, D.K.S.Bhawa1L Raépm (CG) 2. Assistant Comissionaer, ’I‘J‘IMI & WeH‘are Départmam Kdgikez {CG} 3. District Education Omcer, Ranker, District — Kanker {CG-J 4a Block Eil&uca’{i0n 0&icer, Kanker, District — /Kanker (CG) WET PELHLLION”UNDER-ARTICLE 32§1221 QF fHL (191:1 $E‘1rl‘UJ‘101iDf IND-IA SB: {{Qn’iak ghri $a€i§h K. Agzika:ri_,_3. Mesant Shri D.N.Prajapati, Advocate for :he petitioner. ‘ 31m ‘Lvf.I-‘.S.Bhatia, Degyuty Gevemmem Advocate for‘the State/respondents“ QRAL 0mg (Pasmd an 14m day 0f August, 2968) 1. With the consent ofthe parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on inshuetions, seeks pemission ofthis Court to Withdraw this petition with iibexijl to Me a representation before the respoment-authorities,' in Right of the judgment and order ciaied 24.08.1992 passed by the Madhya. E’radesh State Admiaistrative Tribuna}, Eabalpur, in 0A. No. 2745 of $9 (Madhukam Yadu and 56 ethers v. State ofM.I-’. 8a Others) and subsequemiy comimed by ihe Hon’bie Supreme Calm Vide ortier dated (33.01. .1994 passee in Sgeciai Leave 9etitioe {Ca'viD Ne. 6892/93. 3. Learned eeunsei appearing for the other side has no objeciion. 4. Accordingjy, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above stated