IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12439 of 2011 SUDARSHAN YADAV @ CHAUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 02.05.2011 Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report and it is stated that in the year 1994 i.e. after institution of the case, house of the petitioner was raided and some articles were recovered. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that investigation of this case continued till 2008 and the petitioner was in jail custody in connection with Sessions Trial no. 272A/1997 and again he was remanded in Sessions Trial no. 435/2008 and when he got bail in the aforesaid cases, the police remanded the petitioner in the present case. It is also pointed out by him that the alleged recovery is nothing but only high handedness of the police and, as a matter of fact, the seized articles are of general use. It is pointed out by him that other accused have already been acquitted after full-fledged trial. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Sudarshan Yadav @ Chaudhary, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in Nautan P.S. Case no. 34/1994. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)