IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 19TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 28TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 23826 of 2008(J) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------------- VALSAMMA THOMAS, AGED 50 YEARS, W/O.C.K.NADHAN, HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT, GOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOL, PIRAVOM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.K.RAJAGOPAL RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARAIT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE HEAD MISTRESS, GOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOL, PIRAVOM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.A.J. VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/09/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.23826/2008 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of September, 2008 JUDGMENT The prayer sought for in this writ petition is a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 reoption, which according to the petitioner is remaining as such, in view of the pendency of WP(c).No.2631/2004. Now the petitioner points out that the writ petition was dismissed by Ext.P1 judgment. If the facts are as stated by the petitioner, there is no reason why, Ext.P4 should not be considered. Accordingly, the 2nd respondent shall take up Ext.P4, if the same is pending his consideration and pass orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 8 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. 2 Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE vi. 3