IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS MONDAY, THE 1ST MARCH 2010 / 10TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 4482 of 2010(I) --------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. K.N.SASEENDRAN, S/O.NANU,AGED 50, RESMI VILASAM,MANGARAM,KONNI,PATHANAMTHITTA. 2. SONI SASEENDRAN, S/O.SASEENDRAN, AGED 25, RESMI VILASAM, MANGARAM, KONNI P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA. 3. PARPVATHY NANDAN, W/O.SONI SASEENDRAN, AGED 22, RESMI VILASAM, MANGARAM, KONNI P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADV. SRI.K.R.VINOD SMT.M.S.LETHA RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KONNI POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KONNI POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA. 4. S.NANDAKUMAR, ANUGRAHA, OPP.GOVT.HOSPITAL, KONNI P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA. W.P.(C).NO.4482 OF 2010 I 5. LETHA NANDAKUMAR, W/O.S.NANDAKUMAR, ANUGRAHA, OPP.GOVT.HOSPITAL, KONNI P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI T.K. VIPINDAS. ADV. SRI.V.PHILIP MATHEW FOR R4 & 5 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.(C).NO.4482 OF 2010 PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 THE COPY OF THE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY LOCAL REGISTRAR OF MARRIAGE DATED 26.1.2010. EXT.P2 THE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BEFORE RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 3 SEEKING POLICE PROTECTION. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. // True Copy // PS to Judge K. M. JOSEPH & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. -------------------------------------------------- W.P(C). NO.4482 OF 2010 I --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st March, 2010 JUDGMENT K.M. Joseph, J. Petitioners 2 and 3 are husband and wife. The fourth respondent is the father of the third petitioner. Fifth respondent is her mother. It is their case that the third petitioner eloped with the second petitioner. There is a Habeas Corpus Writ Petition also filed by the father of the third petitioner. It is stated that after the Judgment in the said Writ Petition, respondents 4 and 5 are making threat to the petitioners. Petitioners filed Ext.P2 complaint. 2. We heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. Learned counsel for respondents 4 and 5 submits that respondents 4 and 5 have no intention to do any harm to the life of the petitioners. We record the submission and direct that WPC.4482/2010 I 2 respondents 1 to 3 shall afford adequate protection for the life of the petitioners against respondents 4 and 5 and their agents. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Sd/= K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE Sd/= M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JUDGE kbk. // True Copy // PS to Judge