IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 5774 of 2008. Decided on: 20.07.2010. ________________________________________________________________ Jagdish Kumar. … Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner. : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents. : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Petitioner’s case, in a nutshell, is that fictional and artificial breaks are being given to deprive him for being considered for regularization. It is settled law by now that fictional and artificial breaks cannot be given to deprive the workman of his right to be considered for regularization. Mr. Vikas Rathore, learned Deputy Advocate General fairly submits that steps are being taken that in future fictional and artificial breaks are not given to the workmen to deprive them of their right for being considered for regularization. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - 2. Consequently, in view of the above observations, the present petition is disposed of. There will be no order as to costs. (Rajiv Sharma), J. July 20, 2010. (sck).