1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Letters Patent Appeal No. 72/2008 in Writ Petition No. 1673/2007 (Decided) Smt. Malti Dattatraya Bhoyar ..vs.. The State of Maharashtra and anr. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Dhatrak, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Ahirkar, A.G.P. for respondent no. 1. Mr. Johrapurkar, Advocate for respondent no. 2. CORAM: D. K. DESHMUKH AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATED : 19 th NOVEMBER, 2008 1. Heard. 2. Purusal of the record shows that the petitioner was claiming that she was continued in the service of Municipal Council, Ghatanji from 01.05.1986. No documentary evidence was produced even no effort was made to get the document produced from the Municipal Council. In the absence of any evidence, the Labour Court rejected the reference. Lastly, the learned Single Judge, in our opinion, has rightly rejected the petition. We find no substance in the Letters Patent Appeal. The same is, therefore, rejected. JUDGE JUDGE kahale