1!^ E; 1 (rzr TN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH c^ft. ^._ WRIT PETITION N0^^3 OF 2007 PETITIONER: ^y ^.ri' ••' r-t^ ^^" '"-A^ ?>-:'" Kunwar Ravindra Pratap Singh, S/o Late Shri Kimwar Harivansh Singh, Retired Pafrwari, Aged about 65 years, R/o Village Balampur, Post and Tahsil Sitapur, District Surguja (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS ^" RESPONDENTS : ..G°^ %^ >r- V^6^ te^^'~ ^' State ofChhattisgarh through its Secretary, Department of Mantralaya, D.K.S. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Revenue, Bhawan, The Collector, _ Baikunthpur, .District Korea (Chhattisgarh) The Sub Divisional Officer, Revenue, Baikunthpur, District Korea (Chhattisgarh) The District Treasury Officer, Baikimthpur, District Korea (Chhattisgarh) The Tahsildar, Baikunthpur District Korea (Chhattisgarh) The Tahsildar, Manendragarh, District Korea (Chhattisgarh) <SS>- ^ ^' @ WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF DSfDIA €)/ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH : BILASPUR PETiTIONER WR!T PETiTION (S'i N0.2153 OF 2007 Kumvar Ravindra Pratap Singh fersus RESPONDENTS atti ^i4«Bf*\v^ g fl v^fi f\v ' A' B^n <^v§/^ -^t'^t£2 '^^•$t ^^*^/rsi' ^^ /ritV%t?a»-^a4f^ ii^nvTtV^ f^.^p' 1 uni/j 3/^ ?6TlilOH UHOSr AH[}C16 Z^G OT 109 UOHSIIIUIIOH :OT IROIa' Sinale [D, J. ent:- Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Adv. General forthe State. Shri Alok Awasthi, Collector, Korea and Shri Sohan Lal Thakur, Sub Divisiona! Officer, Baikunthpur, present. 01 e atso <th (Passed on this 10'" day of March, 2010) . At the very outset,the Collector, Korea, submits that proper action shai! be taken aaainst the errina officer, who has aiven the statement on 13-8-2009 and thereafter has. neither taken any steps nor made any representation, before the Court Tor further extensioh of time. The Collector further submits that the pension case ofthe petitioner has aiready been settled andthe paymenthas been made.. • VVith regard to grant of interest to the petitioner on the delayed payment is concernsd, the same shail be considered by the Coilector in accordance with ia'A' and as per the verdict of the Supreme Court rendered in Stats of Keraia and Others v. M. Padmanabhan Nasr . • . In view of foregoing, according to learned coynsel appearlng for the petitioner, nothing s:urvives in this petition for adjudication. Accordinaiv, the writ petition is disposed of. 1AIR 1985 SC 356