IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 11985 of 2008. Decided on: 05.07.2011. _______________________________________________ Dharam Singh Parihar. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Neeraj K. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Mr. Neeraj K. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner has cited the judgment rendered by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Ram Kishan Versus State of H.P. and another, CWP(T) No.11791 of 2008, decided on May 6, 2011, in which on the same or similar facts the writ petition has been allowed and the respondents have been ordered to place the petitioner in the pay scale of ` 7000-10980, with effect from 1st January, 1996. 2. Since the facts of the present case are same or similar to the case in which the judgment cited hereinabove has 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - been rendered, the present petition is allowed. Respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner in view of the principles of law laid down by this Court in the judgment cited hereinabove, within a period of ten weeks after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. July 05, 2011. (sck).