IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2010 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.J.S.KHEHAR, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.V.PINTO CCC No.2127/2010 (CWIL) BETWEEN: Sridevi, W/o Shivanand Anad Aged about 50 years, 0cc: Household R/o Infront of Dattatreya Temple, Gandi Chowk, Dharwad. ... COMPLAINANT (By Sri.Anandkumar A.Magadum, Adv) AND: Dr. K.V.Trilokchandra, The Commissioner, Hubli Dharwad Municipal Corporation, Hubli. .RESPONDENT/cc 5EO* (By Sri.I.G.Gachchinmath and // Sri.Gurudev N.Gachchinmath, Advs) This CCC is filed u/s 1 1 and 12 of the Contemplt of Courts Act and Article 215 of the Constitution of India, praying to initiate the contempt proceedings against the respondent-accused for not complying with the order of this Hon’ble Court dated 09.02.2010 at Annexure-a passed in W.A.No.451/207 and punish respondent. This CCC coming on for orders, this day, the Chief Justice., made the following: ORDER J.S.KHEHAR, C.J. (Oral) The instant contempt petition came to be filed alleging disobedience of an order dated 09.02.2010 which was passed by a Division Bench of this court while disposing of W.A.No.45 1 / 2007. 2. After notice was issued, the accused-respondent has filed counter affidavit tendering an explanation for the delay in taking a final decision. The aforesaid delay stands explained in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the counter affidavit. 3. An order dated 16.11.2010 was placed on record F3 of this case vide memo dated 30.11.2010 depicting the compliance of the directions issued by this court on 09.02.2010. 4. In view of the above, we are satisfied that the directions issued by this court stand fully complied with. Delay, if any, stands fully explained. In view of the above, we are satisfied that the instant contempt petition has been rendered infructuous. 3 Accordingly, rule issued to the accused-respondent is discharged. sd/ JUDGE JUDGE Jm/