IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal WP No.416 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION : MARCH 31, 2010 BHURA SINGH ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Received by post. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl.AG, Punjab. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) The telegram received on the administrative side has been treated as a petition on the judicial side. Learned counsel for the respondent-State contends that Banjara son of Karnail Singh and Bhuti son of Bhura Singh had temporarily left their homes and have, now, returned to their homes. The statement of petitioner-Bhura Singh to that effect has been taken. In view of the statement of learned counsel for the respondent- State, illegal custody is not made out and, therefore, the petition is dismissed. March 31, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?