1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.6400 OF 2009 Mohan Chalaram Chawla & ors. ..PETITIONERS VERSUS The State of Mah. & ors. ..RESPONDENTS Mr D.P. Palodkar, Advocate for the petitioners; Mr V.H. Dighe, A.G.P. for respondent no.1; Mr Ujwal Patil, Advocate holding for Mr Rajendra Deshmukh for respondents no.2 to 4. CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND A.V. POTDAR, JJ. DATE : 5th October, 2009 PER COURT : This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for challenging the issuance of the notices by the respondent, dated 31.8.2009 which were received by the petitioners on 14.9.2009. Shri Palodkar, learned Counsel for the petitioner states on instructions that the petitioners have already responded to the aforesaid notices and have sought building permission from the respondents. Shri Palodkar,learned Counsel for the petitioner, therefore, states that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to avail the alternate remedies as are available to the petitioners in law, in the event the reply 2 submitted by the petitioners is rejected by the respondents and adverse action is initiated against the petitioners. In that light of the matter, this writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. ( A.V. POTDAR, J.) ( P.V.HARDAS, J.) amj/wp6400.09