IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31293 of 2006 NEYAZ AHMAD KHAN @ FARHAN KHAN & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- For the petitioners:Mr. Akhileshwar Kr.Shrivastava,Adv. For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, A.P.P. For Opp.Party no.2: Mr. Satyavrat Verma, Adv. _______ 8 06-08-2008 On 30.7.2007, this matter was heard in Chambers of Hon’ble Mr.Justice Ghanshyam Prasad and pursuant to reconciliation of the proceeding in the Chamber the petitioner Neyaz Ahmad Khan @ Farhan Khan and his wife Shahnaz Begum ( Opp.Party no.2) left the Court premises to go home to live as husband and wife. Thereafter, no information has been received by the learned counsel for Opp.Party no.2, Mr. Satyavrat Verma regarding the life being led by his client, Shahnaz Begum .On the other hand, Mr. Akhileshwar Kr. Srivastava , learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the parties are living in the matrimonial home where the complainant Shahnaz Begum is being treated with all respect and cordiality and she has not raised any further complain. Due regard being had to the situation at hand and the alleged compromise having been reached between the parties out of the Court it would only be proper for the parties to appear before the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah where they will file a joint compromise petition duly attested by their parents and their respective accredited counsels. In the event of their appearing before the learned Magistrate - 2 - and filing a compromise petition in that regard the learned Magistrate will take into account the compromise between the parties and on being satisfied that peace and tranquility has returned to the marital home and the wife is living in cordial bliss shall proceed to dispose of the application on compromise in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observation, this application is disposed of. ( Abhijit Sinha, J) NKS/-