-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2306 OF 2005 Urison Exports Pvt.Ltd. and Ors. ..Applicants Vs. Shikhar Trading Ltd. & Anrs. ..Respondents ... Mr.Vijay M.Vaghela & Arjun Bhilare Advocate for Applicants Mr.D.P.Adsule, A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : SEPT. 1,2005 DATE : SEPT. 1,2005 DATE : SEPT. 1,2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicants and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking quashing of process issued against them by the learned Addl.Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 23rd Court at Esplanade, Mumbai in Complaint No.592/S/2002. In the said case, process was issued under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. -2- 3. For the reasons recorded in my order dated 13th June, 2005 in W.P.No. 213 of 2005 and dated 21st June, 2005 in Cri.Application No.550 of 2005, I am of the opinion that the applicants have an efficacious remedy of preferring revision against the order of Magistrate issuing process. Hence, in my view, it would be appropriate that the applicants prefer a revision before the concerned Sessions Court against the order of the Magistrate issuing process. 4. Liberty is granted to the applicants to prefer the necessary revision before the concerned Sessions Court. The learned advocate for the applicants makes a statement that the necessary revision will be preferred within four weeks from today. In view of this statement, the trial before the trial Court is stayed for a period of four weeks from today. 5. On the necessary revision being preferred by the applicants before the concerned Sessions Court, the concerned Sessions Court shall dispose of the -3- matter on merits after hearing the necessary parties. 6. Criminal Application is disposed of. 7. Authenticated copy be issued to the parties. [V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]