HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No. 14106 of 2011 ORDER: Questioning the action of the 1st respondent in not passing orders on the petitioner’s appeal dated 3.5.2011 against the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 22.2.2011 with regard to seizure of the petitioner’s bore well without issuing notice, the present writ petition is filed. The petitioner had earlier filed Writ Petition wherein this Court directed the petitioner to avail the remedy of appeal to the 1st respondent. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner preferred writ appeal and withdrew the writ petition. Sri Kothapally Ram Mohan Chowdary, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that the Division Bench did not grant liberty to the writ petitioner to file writ petition afresh. In such circumstances, the order of the 2nd respondent cannot be made the subject matter of challenge in another writ petition. The only relief which can be granted in favour of the petitioner in the present case is to direct the 1st respondent before whom the appeal is pending to dispose of the appeal within a specified period. Under the circumstances, I consider it appropriate to direct the 1st respondent to dispose of the appeal preferred by the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, in the circumstances, without costs. ____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J Date:18.5.2011 Note: Furnish c.c. in three days B/o pnb