THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.4245 of 2009 Date:23rd September, 2009 Between: Sapavath Bodka …Petitioner and 1. Sapavath Sakur & Ors. …Respondents *** THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.4245 of 2009 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the docket orders dated 30.04.2009 and 03.06.2009 passed in I.A.No.258 of 2009 in A.S.No.5 of 2009 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Miryalaguda. 2. The petitioner is the respondent in A.S.No.5 of 2009. The respondents herein are the appellants in the said appeal. They filed I.A.No.258 of 2009 seeking suspension of the execution of the decree and judgment dated 13.03.2009 passed in O.S.No.154 of 2001 on the file of the Additional Junior Civil Judge, Miryalaguda. The petitioners herein filed counter in the stay application. The learned Senior Civil Judge heard the appellants in part and granted interim suspension till 03.06.2009. It appears on 03.06.2009 the petitioner herein reported not ready and thereupon, the interim suspension order granted on 30.04.2009 came to be extended until furthers orders. The next date of adjournment is 14.07.2009. The docket orders dated 30.04.2009 and 03.06.2009 are assailed in this revision. 3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the docket orders dated 30.04.2009 and 03.06.2009 passed in I.A.No.258 of 2009 in A.S.No.5 of 2009 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Miryalaguda. 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that the learned Senior Civil Judge without adverting to the counter filed by him, proceeded to extend the interim suspension order. It is evident from the docket order dated 03.06.2009 that the petitioner herein reported not ready and consequently, the interim suspension order came to be extended until further orders. The next date of adjournment is stated to be 14.07.2009. It is not clear from the record as to what happened subsequent to 14.07.2009. I do not see any illegality or irregularity in the interim orders dated 30.04.2009 and 03.06.2009 passed in I.A.No.258 of 2009 in A.S.No.5 of 2009 warranting interference of this Court in exercise of powers under Section 115 CPC. The petitioner is at liberty to contest I.A.No.258 of 2009 and invite final order on merits. The learned Senior Civil Judge is directed to dispose of the said I.A. within a month from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order, if not already disposed of. 5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed at the admission stage. No costs. ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date:23nd September, 2009. cs