IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 1187 of 2004 (M/B) 1. Mukesh Kuman Chauhan S/o Lakhan Singh (Gram Pradhan). 2. Pawan Saini S/o Chauhal Singh, 3. Bijendra Kumar S/o Prithvi Singh, All R/o Village Meerpur, P.S. Ranipur, District Haridwar. ……… Petitioners Versus State of Uttaranchal through Secretary (Home), Uttaranchal Shashan, Dehradun & others. ………… Respondents Mr. M.C. Bansal, learned counsel on behalf of the petitioners. Mr. D.K. Sharma, learned Government Advocate for the State. Mr. Vivek Shukla, learned counsel for respondent No. 3. Coram: Hon. V.S. Sirpurkar, C.J. Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J. (Per Hon’ble the Chief Justice) 1. Heard Mr. M.C. Bansal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, Mr. D.K. Sharma, learned Government Advocate on behalf of respondents No. 1 & 2 and Mr. Vivek Shukla, learned counsel on behalf of respondent No. 3. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to and is allowed to withdraw the writ petition. However, if the petitioners or anyone of them approaches the Magistrate for bail, their application shall be decided within 8 days of the making thereof. 3. With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) (V.S. Sirpurkar, C.J.) 04.12.2004 04.12.2004 G