IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 921 OF 2005 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 236 OF 2003 KRISHNA S. NAIK GAONKAR AND 15 ....Applicants ORS., Versus MRS. NAYAN G. GAONKAR AND 55 ORS., ....Respondents Mrs. N. Narvenkar, Advocate for the applicants. Shri R. G. Ramani, Advocate for the respondents No. 21 to 36 & 38 Coram:- R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. Date:- 24th February, 2006 P.C. Heard Advocate for the applicants and the Advocate for the respondents No.21 to 36 and 38. Considering the facts disclosed in the application which reveal sufficient cause for delay in taking appropriate steps, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 5. The appellants shall take appropriate steps to serve the unserved respondents, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution without being referred to the Court. If steps are taken before 15th March, 2006, issue notice to the unserved respondents, returnable in the weeks commencing from 12th June, 2006. Application stands disposed of. R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. ssm.