IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9687 of 2005 Madan Mohan Singh, son of late Ram Udar Singh, resident of village-Rajpur, Police Station-Mejarganj, District- Sitamarhi Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Secretary, Cane Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Secretary, Cane Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Industrial Development Commissioner, Bihar, Patna 4. The Cane Commissioner, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5. Riga Sugar Company Ltd., Riga, District-Sitamarhi thorugh its Managing Director 6. The Managing Director, Riga Sugar Company Limited, Riga, District-Sitamarhi. 7. The President, Riga Sugar Company Limited, Riga, District- Sitamarhi. 8. The Senior Cane Manager, Riga Sugar Company Ltd., Riga, District-Sitamarhi. ----------- 2. 09.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that for adjudicating the matter findings of facts have to be adjudicated at first and in that view of the matter he prays for liberty to move before the appropriate forum for redressal of his grievances. Learned counsel for the State does not oppose the plea. In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed off with a liberty to the petitioner to institute appropriate proceeding before the competent forum with regard to the grievances as raised in the writ petition. The petitioner will further be at liberty to file appropriate application for condonation of delay, if any, and for the period for which the present writ petition was 2 pending shall be excluded by the Court/ authority concerned while computing such limitation, if any. Anand Kr. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)