1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 280 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2363 OF 2000 Shri Chandrashekar Kulkarni & Ors. .... Applicants. V/s. Dr.Siddharth Ambaji Patil & Anr. .... Respondents ..... Mr.Vinayak Shete i/by Poorvi Kamani for the applicants. Mr.A.S.Shitole, APP for State. ..... CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR, J. DATE : 22ND SEPTEMBER, 2009. P.C. 1. The application is for restoration of the petition. 2. Heard learned counsel for the respondents. 3. The learned counsel for the respondents makes a statement that on multiple occasions, the petition came to be dismissed because it was been not attended. He is pressing for costs. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners pointed out that the present petition was tagged with other matters and they are in a group. It was 2 not noticed on the board. He has stated out the reasons in paragraph nos.10 & 11 of the application. 5. Considering the fact that the absence of the learned counsel was unintentional, the application is granted and the Criminal Application No. 2363 of 2000 is restored subject to the cost of Rs.2000/-, which shall be paid till 6 th October 2009 to the respondent no.1 or his advocate. (V.R.KINGAONKAR, J.)