IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21628 of 2009 NAGAWALI RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 11.08.2009 Heard both sides. This case reflects misuse of privilege of bail. Petitioner was made accused in a case instituted under Section 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code in relation of occurrence that had taken place on 24.4.1992. He was granted bail on 12.10.1992. Subsequently, cognizance was taken on 23.11.1992. Petitioner’s bail bond was cancelled on 4.1.1993 and he was declared absconder in 2005. Learned counsel submits that after his getting bail the processes were issued under Section 204 Cr.P.C. which however, was not served. Referring to the impugned order, it is contended that liberty was granted to him to renew his prayer for bail after four months. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Gopalpur 2 P.S. Case No. 49 of 1992, Tr. No. 27 of 2006 subject to the conditions:- (i) One of the bailors should be the own/close family members of the petitioner. (ii) Bailors should be either Government servant or legal representative. The petitioner shall continue appear in person on the each date fixed at the trial. In the event of default on two consecutive dates, the trial court shall liberty to cancel his bail bond and secure his arrest in accordance with law. P.K. (K.K. Mandal, J.)