1 Cri.Appln.Nos.3080/2010 & 1952/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3080/2009 VIJAY RAMKRISHNA KHAMBADKAR AND ANR. - APPLICANTS VERSUS SHAIKH RABBANI JILANI & ANR. - RESPONDENTS ***** Mr.VR Jain, Adv. For Applicants; Mr.KS Patil APP for State; Ms.AN Ansari, Adv. For Resp.No.2. WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1952/2009. SYED IRSHAD AHMED KAZI - APPLICANT V/S THE STATE OF MAH AND ANR. - RESPONDENTS ***** Ms.AN Ansari, Advocate for Applicant; Mr.KS Patil APP for State. Mrs.MA Kulkarni, Adv. For Resp.No.2. ----- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 10th February, 2011. PER COURT : . Heard both the learned Counsel. 2) On instructions, Criminal Application No.3080/2009 and Criminal Application No. 1952/2009 are allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of. Rule discharged. 2 Cri.Appln.Nos.3080/2010 & 1952/2009 3) It is clarified that all objections, as regards maintainability of the criminal prosecution, including innocence of the petitioners/accused, are kept open to be agitated before the learned Judge, seized with the mater. 4) Considering peculiar nature of the controversy and the petitioners, soon to be retired, the learned Judge, shall ensure to dispose of the proceedings within a period of three months after 9th March, 2011. The parties to appear before the learned Judge on 9th March, 2011. 5) No accommodation/adjournment to be given to Respondent No.1(original complainant), and if he avails any unreasonable accommodation, the learned Judge seized with the matter, considering the plight of the petitioners, being Government employees, shall deal sternly with such protraction of Shaikh Rabbani. 6) With above clarification, both the Criminal Applications are disposed of. ( K.U.CHANDIWAL ) JUDGE bdv/