[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELALTE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 570 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 570 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 570 OF 2007 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APEAL NO. 467 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APEAL NO. 467 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APEAL NO. 467 OF 2007 Ravi Dnyaneshwar Hole ..Applicant V/s The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. Mr.V.B. Topkir, Advocate for the applicant. Mr.F.R. Shaikh, APP for the State. CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. J.H. BHATIA, J. J.H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 4TH JUNE , 2007. DATE : 4TH JUNE , 2007. DATE : 4TH JUNE , 2007. P.C. . Heard Mr.Topkir, learned Counsel for the applicant and Mr.Shaikh, learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant was convicted for the offence punishable under section 366 of Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to undergo S.I.for three years and to pay fine of Rs.1000/-. He has preferred an appeal against the conviction and sentence. The appeal is admitted 2. The applicant seeks to be released on bail pending the appeal. It appears that the present applicant is original accused No.2. He was accompanying the accused No.1, when the prosecutrix was abducted [2] forcibly by taking her by the car. The accused No.1 wanted to marry the girl. He was absconding during the trial. Only the present applicant was put to trial and was convicted and sentenced. He was on bail during the trial and there is no allegations of misuse of bail. Taking into consideration the circumstances above, I find that the applicant may be granted bail. 3. Pending the appeal the applicant be released on bail on same terms and conditions as before the trial Court subject to his furnishing fresh bail bonds and depositing the find amount. (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (J.H. BHATIA, J.)