IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13011 of 2010 SHIVNANDAN PRASAD S/O- LATE ATWAR PRASAD, RESIDENCE OF VILLAGE – KAHAWARA, P.S. KHIJARSARAI, DISTRICT – GAYA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE GAYA, DISTRICT – GAYA. 3. DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER GAYA, DISTRICT – GAYA. 4. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER PIPARSARAI, GAYA, DISTRICT – GAYA. ----------- 02. 12.08.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 29th of February 2000 from the post of Jan Sevak while working in the office of Block Development Officer, Piparsarai, District – Gaya, all the retiral dues have been paid, however, the payment of provident fund dues have not been paid despite representation. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submits that petitioner has filed this writ petition after long delay without valid justification. It is further submits that the averments made in the writ application are not clear and as such, the claims of the petitioner for G.P.F. needs to be verified from the records. 2 In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 3 with a copy to respondent no. 4. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously. Upon consideration, if the representation of the petitioner finds favour the admitted dues if any, may also be paid to the petitioner. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)