CWP-12036/10 (1) In The High Court Of Judicature For Rajasthan Jaipur Bench, Jaipur O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12036/2010 Hemlata Narula Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. Date Of Order :: 08/09/2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Ms. Hemlata Narula, petitioner in person. The petitioner who is holding the post of Teacher Grade-IIIrd after serving in a government school at Madhabas Panchayat Samiti Ramgarh as per her own saying about three years, has been transferred to a nearby Government School, Dumeda which is at a distance of 20 kms vide order dt.27.7.2010 (Annx.4) and in pursuance thereto she has been relieved to report at the place of her transfer. Petitioner appeared in person and submits that students of Government School, Madhabas have been finally merged in nearby Government School at Guzuki and in such circumstances there was no justification for the respondents to transfer the petitioner in another government school which is at a distance of 20 kms and there is also policy of the government that those who were appointed against widow quota should ordinarily not be disturbed and in such circumstances action of the respondents in passing of the order CWP-12036/10 (2) impugned dt.27.7.2010 (Annx.4) is also arbitrary and deserves to be quashed. The submission made is without substance for the reason that petitioner after having remained posted at Madhabas has been transferred to a nearby government school Dumeda which is at a distance of 20 kms under the scheme of equalization/rationalization introduced by the government and it is true that widow should ordinarily not be disturbed but under the scheme of rationalization the authority took decision to transfer the petitioner in nearby government school which cannot be said to be arbitrary requiring interference. Apart from it, the petitioner could not claim any lien to continue at one station and the transfer is an incidence of service and it is also not the case of the petitioner where she has alleged malice against the authority who has passed the order impugned or violation of statutory rules if any. This Court does not find substance in the petition. Consequently, the petition stands dismissed. (Ajay Rastogi),J. VS Shekhawat/-p.2 12036cw10Sep08FnlDsms.doc