IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16657 of 2011 Satya Narain Prasad Yadav, Son of Late Golabi Rai, R/O Village- Nauya Chak, P.S.- Sarairanjan, District- Samastipur. . Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The District Magistrate, Samastipur 3. The District Development Commissioner, District- Samastipur 4. The Block Development Officer, Block- Sarairanjan, District- Samastipur 5. The District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corporation, Samastipur. 6. Officer-in-charge, Sarairanjan Police Station, District- Samastipur. . . . . . Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2/ 23.12.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make officer-in-charge, Sarairanjan police station, District Samastipur as respondent no.6. The petitioners, who is a P.D.S. dealer under Sarairanjan Block in the district of Samastipur, prays for quashing notice issued by Block Development Officer, Sarairanjan, Samastipur (Annexure-1), whereby he has directed to refund a sum of Rs.27,98,101/- towards the values of 2042.41 quintals of undistributed rice allotted under SGRY Scheme and F.F.W. Scheme at the rate of Rs.13.70 per kg. The petitioner disputes the quantity of rice allotted to him. The petitioner submits that a different quantity has been shown in the F.I.R. due against the petitioner. In the interlocutory application, the petitioner states that after distribution only 561.25 quintals of rice remains in his stock under FFW Scheme and 61.81 quintals of rice remains under SGRY Scheme, as per the audit report of the respondents. The petitioner submits that he has already 2 deposited a sum of Rs.10,000/- with the respondents. Counsel for the State submits that the submission of the petitioner is subject to verification. Earlier similar matters had come up before this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 (Awadh Prasad Singh Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) & C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 (Suresh Prasad @ Raj Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.). The aforesaid writ applications have been disposed of by order dated 06.07.2011 after noticing the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. As the facts and issues are common, the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 would also govern the instant writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 with the condition that the petitioner would deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (One Lac) within a period of 12 weeks from today. The petitioner would file his representation within a period of eight weeks from today, which would be disposed of within a further period of three months. In the meantime, no coercive steps would be taken against the petitioner. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)