^ ^sc ^y Petitioner HlSH COURT OF CHHA7TSSGARH: BiLASPUR Wnt Petiiaon jSli No. of Shaiiesh Tlwari. aged about 42 vsars, S/o. Lsts S'h.rl 3.P. Tiwsn. oocuDstiop Ssrvlcs r--—,—^. /^. :——.! ,^^--!,^:,^<- „- ;/'.~^-^^,-,^ fl ....!«:7.^..^,,.. r'u^teL ^3U;&fu vyUi ^: ly si r'veiai-siydi i"iiUsjE^i,^^ui. South Surguja, r/o. Ambikapur, Distt. Surcjuis (CG). • ") Staie of Chhattisaarh tnrouan its Secreta?v DsDSrtrrtsnt of ^ofsst. D.K.S. SPS'A^H. RS'DLT \'*-f^/- 2; Under Seoretary, Dspartment of Forest. D.K.S. Bhswsn. Rgipur ('CG). *^) DiViSiOHSi .hGfSSt UttsCSf, AfHDtKSpUF, U;Stt. SurQUiS (CG). 'tWrit Petition underArticle 226 orthe Constitution of ind.a) rtSiu Sh" Vinav Pandsv. counss' fo' the Det'tioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate TOF the State. O'RAL OROS; fpassied on 11 dav of-Julv. 2008) With oonsent of iearned CDunse! appesring for both ths parttes, the matter is heard finaiiy. 1) Learned counsel appearing for the DetRioner submits tnat tne petitioner does nat want to press this petition on merits at inis staae. Ho^vever, She pefitionec prays thst the representatton dated 3-7-2008 (Annexure P/3) pendirig before the concemed authoriEies mav be directed to be decided within the prescriOed tlms. 2) ' Shri Arun Sac, Isamed Govt. Aavocate appearing for tne State submits that there is no reason why tne psnaing representation snould not oe decidsd by the concerned authority, expecitiously. 3) In view of the foresoing, the petition is disposea of with a direction to tne concernsd authorities to consider and'decide the reoresentation as stated aDcwe, in ascordance Witn isw, on its own ments, as esriy as possi&te, Dreferabiy within a period of two weeks from the (Jate of receiDt of a copv of this oraer. !vir. Sao further Submits tnat no coereive steps snali be taken, tii! ine •Qisposal of' tne representatton. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge