i <^ ^.\Q^L^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR C.G. WRIT PETITION N0.230 <£/2004 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS '^ t\" \A^^ ^^\ ..-•"^^ ' ^P\^'".F" Virendra Kumar Mishra, s/o late Shri Vidyadhar Mishra, aged about 58 years, R/o Bouri Para, Ambikapur, District Sarguja(C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through- the secretary, Department of Home, GovL of Chhattisgarh, D.K. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director General of Police, Police Headquarter, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Inspector General of Police, Sarguja Range, District Sarguja (C.G.) 4< The Superintendent of Police, Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FQR_ ISSUANCE OF WRIT/WRITS, ORDER/ORDERS, OR/AND DIRECTION / DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/CERTIORAR!, OR OF ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE NATURE. wSSSw^ •'':'•"-^. ^.^,^^^:^^^,.;, XI-HC-22 W^T^T f^ii^ ^^\ sh*4icb ^f^a Pathak ^ V T5? ^I^IH^I, ^Tl1^41Co, [^<V11<111< 3TT^T tT^ra? ^•^AJD- ^S06/^^^- •-•^ 200 w^i^n ^>Hich '^^T' n^T 3TT^T^<TTS[K ^if^a 20-8-2004 PetitionerbyShn ^P'S' ^4^^ State by Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy'. Heard. This batch of cases relate to places. Counsel for the petitioners submij effected illegally in contravention of law a| State counsel submitted that the without sep/ing notice for demand ofjusti| Having heard and cor^sidered t| opinion on the meriis of the case, in the| served if a dxrection is given to the peti^ their grievances and grounds be.fore the| respondents aiong with a copy ofthe peti^ representstion being filed, the State under the 3aw, shall consider and decide law as early as possible preferably wixhin of the ^representation. If any contravent notice, the same be considered on its Counsei for the petitioners pray grievance of xhe petixioners reniains, they under the law. They may avail the remedy With the aforesaid observations, Ccnsequently M.W.P., ifany, alsc Certified copy as pe.r mles. Copy to State counsel for complia tr^nsfer of the petitioners from their respeciive chl^id^1r1 TnTT^ff ^ fecSt iPt^K "^ 3Tf;<m3^?T / ^P^v^ Advocate General. |:ted that the transfer ofthe petitioners has be.en id policy. State c.ounsel opposed it. ^etitioners have su-aightway filed the petitions [.e and representation. |ie rival comentions, without expressing an\r [opimon of this Court, ends ofjustice will be (ioners to make detailed representation raising [State Gove.minent/competent authority of the ^ion and this order, within 10 days, and on such Gove^nmenVcompetent authority of the respondents (ne same on ixs o^-n pienis in accoraanc-e wi.ih six weeks from me aaie of receipi/produciion [on of policy or guidelmes is broughl xo me o^n tnents. tl'tat after the decision ofthe represeniauon ifanv 1 may be allowed to 3V3il the re?nedy available ivailable under the law.. tl^is petition stands disposed o£ stands disposed of. •liahce. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [^