IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (i) Civil Revision No.2495 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision 26.03.2009 Sukhpal Singh and another ......Petitioners VERSUS Rajnish Kumar and others ......Respondents (ii) Civil Revision No.2496 of 2008 (O&M) Amarjit Kaur ......Petitioner VERSUS Rajnish Kumar and others ......Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.B.S.Bhasaur, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Malkeet Singh, Advocate, for the respondents. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J(ORAL): This order shall dispose of abovesaid two revision petitions No.2495 and 2496 of 2008 filed by the petitioners under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the order dated 01.03.2008, passed by Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Phillaur, whereby the application of the petitioners-defendants (herein referred as 'the petitioners') for rejection of the plaint has been dismissed. Heard. It may be noticed that during the pendency of the application under Order 7 Rule 11C.P.C., plaintiffs-respondents (herein Civil Revision No.2495 of 2008 (O&M) -2- referred as 'the respondents) moved an application under Order 6 Rule 17 C.P.C. for seeking relief against petitioner No.1 and the said application was also allowed by way of the impugned order. Even the impugned order, passed by the trial Court, does not suffer from any illegalities. The respondents being dominus litis could claim relief against any of the petitioners or all the petitioners, as such after the application for amendment of the plaint was allowed, the application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. does not survive. Finding no fault with the order of amendment, passed by the trial Court, the revision petition is dismissed. Consequently, the other revision petition is also dismissed. March 26, 2009 (A.N.JINDAL) mamta-II JUDGE