1 fca-63-07 pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 63 OF 2007 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 21 OF 2007 Ms. Minal Bipin Dantal .. Petitioner Vs. Mr. Bipin Ramchandra Dantal .. Respondent Mr. M. A. Utgikar for petitioner. Mr. Hitesh Vyas for respondent. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U. D. SALVI, JJ. DECEMBER 21, 2010. P.C. 1. This appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act and challenging the decree of divorce granted on 22/9/2006 came to be admitted by this court on 27/6/2007. However, during the pendency of the appeal, the parties decided to settle the matrimonial disputes and they have reconciled with each other. We are informed that they have been staying together for the last about one month. We have also noted that the decree of divorce impugned in this appeal was stayed by this court. 2. The parties are present before us and consent terms signed 2 fca-63-07 between them have been verified. We are satisfied that the terms of settlement are in the interest of the parties and, therefore, the settlement deserves to be accepted. Consequently, the decree of divorce granted in P.A. No. 274 of 2005 is required to be quashed and set aside. The consent terms are marked as “X” for identification. 3. Hence the appeal succeeds and the same is hereby allowed in terms of the settlement between the parties. The decree of divorce granted in P.A. No. 274 of 2005 on 22/9/2006 by the Family Court at Pune is quashed and set aside. Parties to bear their own costs. 4. Civil Application No. 21 of 2007 does not survive and stands disposed as such. (U.D. SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)