1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3175 OF 2007 Yuvraj Chingaji Salve and others .. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri V. L. Dhobale, Advocate for the Petitioners. Shri R. P. Phatake, Advocate for the Respondents CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL, AND N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 15TH MARCH, 2010. ORAL ORDER [Per NARESH H. PATIL, J. ] : . Heard. 2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners had filed a representation on 26.07.2006 addressed to Collector which is not yet decided. 2 3. In short the contention of the learned counsel is that the petitioners are belonging to the Scheduled Caste and were in occupation of gayran land since the year 1987-1988. Their request is to regularize their occupation under the policy adopted by the State, as reflected in Government Resolution dated 28th November, 1991, (Exhibit - C). The petitioners are entitled to file a fresh representation within four weeks from today addressed to the Collector and in case such representation is filed within four weeks, we direct the Collector Aurangabad, to pass appropriate orders on the said representation in accordance with the policy adopted by the State. The decision of the Collector shall be communicated to the petitioners within eight weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation. The writ petition is disposed of. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] bsb/Mar.10