1 wp.1612.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1612 OF 2010 Subhash Avchit Suryawanshi ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondents ...... None for Petitioner. Mr.D.P.Adsule, A.P.P. for Respondent. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND U.D.SALVI, JJ. DATED:- SEPTEMBER 13, 2010. P.C. 1. This Petition is received through jail. The Petitioner applied for furlough leave, however, the same has not been granted on the ground that no relative is willing to execute surety bond. The fact so stated is not in dispute. So long as the Petitioner is unable to arrange for relative surety, the question of granting furlough leave does not arise considering the mandate of Rule 6. It will be useful to refer to the observations of the Apex Court in the case of State of Maharashtra & Anr. vs. Suresh Pandurang Darvakar decided on 13th April 2006 being Criminal Appeal No.431 of 2006. 2. In the circumstances, no interference is warranted. The Petition is 2 wp.1612.10.sxw disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner to offer relative surety, after which the Authority may consider furlough leave application afresh on its own merits in accordance with law. 3. Copy of this order be forwarded to the Petitioner, who is in jail. (U.D.SALVI, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)