IN T^HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPURfC.G.') WRFT PETmON N0. ^ LO 2006 •SSJ; •El;f»l PETmOMER RESPOMDENTS y ^,'-fCX *-^ ? '.";' .-»>"~^—^-; '/ ^ v.'^ / ,.^w ?.. Bharat Lal Chandrakar S /o Shri Mohan Lal Chandraka, R/o 16/204, Near Dr. Kulkarni Nursing Home, Tatyapara Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1) State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary Panchayat and Welfare Development, D.K.S. Bhawan,Raipur(C.G.) 2) The Collector, Dhamtari (C.G.) ' 3)The Treasury Department, Dhamtari (C.G.) 4) The Chief Executive Officer Block Kurud, Tahsil and District Dhamtari (C.G.) .&' ^VRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR GRANT OF WRIT NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR CERCIORARI OR ANY WRIT OR DIRECTIQN OF THE LIKE NATAURE -T:- Bablu THE HIGH COUKT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. No. 1610 of 2006 Petitioner Bharat Lal Vs. Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh & others SINGLB BENCH: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHM S.K. AGNIHOTRI Shri S. C. Venna, counscl for the petitioner. Shri A.S. Kaclihawaha, Govenunent Advocate for fhe respondents No. 1 and 2. ORAL ORDER (30AMarch,2006) 1. Leanied counsel for the petitioner claiins that the petitioner has been convicted under fhe provisions of fhe Prevention 'of Corruption Act. Counsel for fhe petitioner is not ia position to state as to when fhe petitioner was convk'ted aad under what ofFences. Learacd couasel further subinlts that no order has been passed consequent to the convictioa offhe petitioaer. 2. The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to graat legal retu-al dues andstatutoiy benefits. 3. The petition is vagvie and does not disclose any cause of action aad hence this would not be entertaiaed for waut of siifiBcfent material and non-disclosure ofcause ofaction. 4. The writ petition is accordmgly dlsaussed. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge ?^^^^^^^^^^^^®;E^g^^;a^^a^^£^^s^E^^^^!^^^B^s8®s^^^^^sgi8!ss^B^^^ga^3^8(tes^'^M4s^^&fl!i^t.u.?^^ w ' . ' •' '"~" . ~