IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2084 of 2008 CHANDANI DEVI @ CHANIYA DEVI, WIFE OF LATE DHARM NATH SINGH, @ DHARM NATH PD. SINGH, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA BICHLA TELPA, P.S. CHHAPRA MUFFASIL, P.O. SAHEBGANJ, DISTRICT CHHAPRA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. MR. D.S. DHARIWAL, THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL BIHAR, PATNA BIRCHAND PATH, PATNA. 3. MR. ANAND SHANKAR, THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE(PERSONAL), BIHAR, PATNA. 4. MR. MEGH NATH RAM, THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE-B, SECRETARIATE, SPECIAL BRANCH, PATNA. 5. MR. B.K. SINGH THE TREASURY OFFICER, SECRETARIATE TREASURY, SINCHAI BHAWAN, PATNA. 6. MR. PRAVIN GHOSH, THE ACCOUNT OFFICER, SPECIAL BRANCH PATNA. ----------- 05. 30.06.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the orders of this court dated 5.5.2008, Annexure-1 retiral dues of the husband of the petitioner has been paid except the amount payable under the Paropkari fund about which prayer was made in the writ application but the respondent authorities denied the existence of any such fund in the counter affidavit. In rejoinder petitioner, however disputed the statement of the authorities made in the counter affidavit that Paropkari fund does not exist in the special branch. This Court while passing the order dated 5.5.2008 has not considered the submission about payment of the amount admissible under Paropkari fund, in the circumstances, if the respondent authorities have not paid the amount admissible 2 under the said fund they cannot be said to have violated the orders of this Court. Accordingly, the contempt application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to request the authorities of the department for payment of the amount admissible under the Paropkari fund and if her request is not granted then to approach this Court for such relief. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)