IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29279 of 2008 PHULJHARIYA DEVI & RAM BHAJAN MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 5.8.2008 Heard. The petitioner no.1 Phuljhariya Devi is the mother of the husband and petitioner no.2 Ram Bhajan Mahto is elder brother of the husband. Some of the facts of the case are relevant to be noticed that the lady was married nine years prior to the lodging of the report and the informant by filing a written report alleged that for not giving a motorcycle and Rs.25,000/- in cash, his daughter was beaten badly by lathi after being dragged out of the house so much so that the lady died. The contention is that the doctor holding the postmortem examination did not find any external or internal injury on the dead body and that because the marriage was solemnized nine years prior to the incident, the offence could not have been registered under Section 304B IPC. It was alternatively submitted that the case could not even be under Section 302 IPC in absence of the medical opinion. The last contention was that some of the family members of the petitioners like father-in-law and others have been admitted to regular bail whereas some other accused persons have been admitted to anticipatory bail. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances and the contention, let the above named two petitioners be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M. Jhanjharpur in Madhepur P.S.Case no.82 of 2007(G.R.No.355 of 2007). B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )