AB 740/2011 BEFORE HON\BLE MR JUSTICE B D AGARWAL Heard Mr. SM Mollah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R Islam, learne d counsel for the complainant objecting the bail prayer. Also heard Mr. K Munir, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This application under section 438 of the Cr.P.C. has been filed by accused peti tioner namely, Dr.Ajit Kumar Tamuli seeking pre-arrest bail apprehending his arr est in connection with Basistha Police Station Case No. 148 of 2010 under se ctions 376 of the Indian Penal Code. Also perused the case diary. The allegation against the petitioner is that while the informant’s minor daught er was working in his house as a domestic help, she was subjected to sexual inte rcourse and as a result the 13-year-old victim girl became pregnant. The learned Addl.P.P. has submitted that the victim has also reiterated the al legation made in the FIR and medical report also certifies about the pregnancy o f the victim girl and the age of the girl. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the victim girl had an aff air with a boy from the village and the girl must have become pregnant through s ome other person. However, no name of any such boy is disclosed in the bail appl ication. If that is so, the accused may pray for DNA test of the victim girl. Having regard to the nature of the allegations and the corroborative evidence av ailable in the case diary, I hold that it is not a fit case to grant anticipator y bail. Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. This anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.