IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Date:6.4.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR Writ Petition No.8610 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 M.Krishnasamy, Vice President, Kavakarapatti, Namakkal District. ... Petitioner vs. 1.The District Collector, Namakkal District, Collectorate, Namakkal 637 001. 2. V.Thandavan, Panchayat President, Kavakarapatti Village, Namakkal District 637 013. ... Respondents Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to take suitable action by passing orders on petitioner's representations dated 18.11.2010 and 9.3.2011 within a time limit to be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.Ramesh Kumar Chopra For first Respondent : Mr.S.Shivashanmugam, Government Advocate. O R D E R Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to take suitable action by passing orders on petitioner's representations dated 18.11.2010 and 9.3.2011 within a time limit to be stipulated by this Court. 2. Mr.S.Shivashanmugam, learned Government Advocate takes notice on behalf of the first respondent. In view of the nature of order that is to be passed safeguarding the interest of the second https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ respondent, the notice to the second respondent is dispensed with. By consent of both parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 3. On 9.3.2011 petitioner has given a complaint/representation to the first respondent and the same was not considered so far. Hence, present writ petition has been filed. 4. Mr.S.Shivashanmugham, learned Government Advocate appearing for the first respondent states that the authority will consider the complaint/representation on its own merits and in accordance with law. 5. In view of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate appearing for the first respondent, the first respondent is directed to consider the complaint/representation dated 9.3.2011 on its own merits and in accordance with law within a reasonable period of time. It is however, made clear that any proceedings against the second respondent will be strictly in accordance with the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Act, so as to avoid allegation of violation of principles of natural justice. 6. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Asst. Registrar //true copy// Sub Asst.Registrar ts To The District Collector, Namakkal District, Collectorate, Namakkal 637 001. 1 cc to Mr.G.Ramesh Kumar Chopra, Advocate, Sr.No.24308 1 cc to Government Pleader, Sr.No.24763 Order in W.P.No.8610 of 2011 RSY {CO} TP/25.4.2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/