CWP No.769 of 2009. 10.12.2009. Present: Mr. N.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Addl. Advocate General, with Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. Advocate General and Mr. Anil Jaswal, Dy. Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3. Petitioner was appointed as PET by the Parents Teachers Association. Respondents No.3 and 4 assailed his appointment. The matter was looked into by the Inquiry Committee. The order was passed by the Inquiry Committee on 16.12.2008. The petitioner assailed the same before the Deputy Commissioner. He dismissed the appeal on 4.12.2008. The primary ground for setting aside the appointment of the petitioner is that wide publicity was not given at the time of recruitment of the petitioner. The petitioner has argued before the Deputy Commissioner that notification for filling up the vacant post was issued on 7.7.2006. Mr. Bhardwaj, learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that 13 candidates had appeared as per the Resolution dated 7.9.2006, Annexure P-1. However, the petitioner has not placed on record the copy of notification dated 7th July, 2006. Accordingly, we are in entire agreement with the findings recorded by both the authorities below. It was necessary to give wide publicity at the time of making appointment to the post of PET by the Parents Teachers Association. Consequently, there is no merit in the writ petition and the same is dismissed. CMP No.1355 of 2009. In view of the dismissal of the writ petition, the present application is also dismissed. Interim order dated 23.3.2009 shall stand vacated. (R.B. Misra), ACJ. 10th December, 2009. (Rajiv Sharma), J. (tr)