IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 16TH JULY 2009 / 25TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 20051 of 2009(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- NIMMY THOMAS, KOVOOR HOUSE, MUTHOOR P.O. THIRUVALLA, NOW WORKING AS HIGHER HER SECONDARY TEACHER, MTE MANAGEMENT,THIRUVALLA BY ADV. SRI.R.SANTHOSH BABU SRI.SHYAM T.MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE OF EDUCATIONA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. REGISTRAR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM. 4. PRINCIPAL, MARTHOMA COLLEGE, THIRUVALLA. 5. MANAGER, MARTHOMA COLLEGE, THIRUVALLA. R1 TO R3 BY S.C. SHRI T.A. SHAJI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.20051 of 2009-B - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 16th day of July, 2009. JUDGMENT The petitioner is seeking for a direction to the respondents to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 representation in the light of the directions issued by this court in Ext.P1 judgment. As per Ext.P1 judgment, this court directed that the grievances raised by the petitioner herein will be considered by the Director of Collegiate Education with notice to the petitioner and respondents 1 to 4 therein. 2. It is pointed out that so far nothing has been done by the second respondent in the matter in spite of the directions issued by this court in Ext.P1. The grievance raised by the petitioner is regarding non payment of salary for the period from 20.12.1996 to 25.8.1998 when she was working as Junior Lecturer in Economics in Marthoma College, Thiruvalla. On account of delinking of Pre degree courses, she was deployed to the Marthoma Higher Secondary School, Venmani and presently she is working there. 3. It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the appointment of the petitioner as Junior Lecturer was against a retirement wpc 20051/2009 2 vacancy and the petitioner responded to the advertisement made by the management at that point of time. It is pointed out that the selection was made after a duly conducted interview also. 4. By Ext.P1 judgment, this court had directed the Director of Collegiate Education to consider the grievance of the petitioner. In Ext.P2 the petitioner has given in detail the grievances in regard to the non payment of salary. There will be a direction to the second respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 after hearing the petitioner and the Manager, viz. the 5th respondent herein, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of the writ petition along with a copy of this judgment before the second respondent for compliance of these directions. The writ petition is disposed o as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/