IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH JANUARY 2010 / 23TH POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 7435 of 2009(Y) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ IDEA CELLULAR LTD, MERCY ESTATE M.G.ROAD, RAVIPURAM, ERNAKULAM REP. BY SENIOR MANAGER (LEGAL) C.RAMACHANDRAN. BY ADV. SRI.P.SANJAY SMT.A.PARVATHI MENON SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR SRI.M.MUHAMMED SHAFI SRI.JINU JOSEPH RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, LOCAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATHS, TRIVANDRUM. 3. AMARAMBALAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, AMARAMBALAM, MALAPPURAM REP BY ITS SECRETARY. 4. NADATHARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH , MOORKANIKARA, P.O.KAZHUKULLY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 5. AMBALLUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KANJIRAMATTOM PO, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.P.G.PARAMESWARA PANICKER, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR R5 SRI.P.GOPAL FOR R5 SRI.V.RAJENDRAN FOR R3 GOVT.PLEADER SRI.V.MANU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.7435/2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER GO(MS) NO.13/09/LHG DTD.2.1.2009. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.A4/1200/08 DTD.8.1.2009. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.A4/25/07 DTD.16.1.2009. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.B/298/07 DTD.20.1.2009. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN WP NO.2644/2009 DTD.23.1.2009. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 7435 OF 2009 (Y) ===================== Dated this the 13th day of January, 2010 J U D G M E N T The challenge in this writ petition is against Ext.P1 and the consequential action taken thereunder. It is now informed that by GO(MS) No.140/09/LSGD dated 22/7/09, Ext.P1 order is ordered to be frozen. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that recording the above, similar writ petitions have been disposed of and a copy of the judgment in WP(C) No.7919/09 is made available for perusal. Therefore, clarifying that any further action for revision of property tax can only be on the basis of the statute law, including any modifications to the statute that may be brought up. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp