C.R.No. 7904 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No. 7904 of 2010 Date of Decision 30.05.2011 Amarjit Petitioner. Versus Smt. Tripta and others. Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kodan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Rajesh Sethi, Advocate, for the respondent. *** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 1.11.2010 passed by Appellate Authority, Jind whereby the prayer made by the petitioner to stay the operation of the order of the Rent Controller, Jind has been accepted subject to payment of `10000/- per month as mesne profit for use and occupation of the demised premises and ` 1000/- per month as rent from the date of order of ejectment. At the time of issuance of notice of motion, this Court passed the following order:- “ Counsel for the petitioner states that the Appellate Authority, Jind has fixed mesne profits @ ` 10,000/- per month during the pendency of the appeal. Counsel states C.R.No. 7904 of 2010 2 that mesne profits ought to have been enhanced proportionately, as the rent was ` 1,000/- per month. Issue Notice of motion for 14.1.2011. Till then, operation of the impugned order, so far as it calls upon the petitioner-tenant to deposit mesne profits @ `10,000/-, is stayed. However, petitioner may deposit the mesne profits @ `4,000/- per month. The final amount shall be determined after hearing counsel for the respondent.” Pursuant to the notice,learned counsel for the respondent has put in appearance and submitted that he would not claim amount more than `4000/- per month as mesne profit but he prayed that the appeal which is pending consideration, may be ordered to be decided at an early date. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent, amount of mesne profit @ ` 4000/- per month as ordered on 3.12.2010 is maintained. The Appellate Authority is, however, directed to decide the appeal within three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. The revision petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) 30.05.2011 JUDGE Anoop