THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2911 OF 2010 ORDER: 1 The unsuccessful plaintiff before the court below approached this court and filed this revision questioning the order dated 22.04.2010 passed in I.A.No.43 of 2010 in O.S.No.21 of 2010 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Mahabubnagar as confirmed by the learned II Additional District Judge, Mahabubnagar in CMA No.8 of 2010 dated 08.06.2010 whereby the courts below refused to grant interim injunction pending disposal of the said suit. 2 The respondents put in their appearance and filed a detailed counter. 3 Heard both sides. 4 It appears from the record that the plaintiff instituted the suit in O.S.No.21 of 2010 before the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Mahabubnagar for grant of permanent injunction restraining the respondents herein from interfering with her possession and enjoyment of the shops existing in the premises of old house bearing no.2-5-8 and its open court yard covered with compound wall totally admeasuring an extent of 204.15 Sq. Yards situated at Eepurigeri, Mahabubnagar proper. Along with the suit the petitioner who is the plaintiff in the said suit filed I.A.No.43 of 2010 for grant of temporary injunction and an order of a d interim injunction was passed on 28.01.2010. But, however when the respondents have put in their appearance and contested the matter, the trial court vacated the said order of injunction on 22.04.2010. Questioning the same, the Petitioner filed CMA No.8 of 2010 and the learned Additional District Judge took up the matter immediately and dismissed the appeal by his order dated 08.06.2010. As stated supra, the same is questioned in this revision and this Court while ordering notice before admission to the respondent directed the parties to maintain status quo obtaining as on that date. 5 As it is a suit for injunction simplicitor and this court had already passed an interim order o 23.07.2010 directing the parties to maintain status quo, I am of the view that this revision can be disposed of with a direction to the parties to maintain status quo during the pendency of the said suit. The court below can also be directed to decide the said suit at the earliest, preferably, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6 With the above observations this revision petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. -------------- 20.08.2010 Kvsn