IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 1591 of 2008 Date of Decision: 4.2.2008 M/s Laqshya Media Pvt. Limited ......Petitioner through Ms. Kulwant K.K. Advocate versus State of Punjab and another .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJENDER JAIN, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ***** Vijender Jain, Chief Justice (Oral) As per her own averment, learned counsel for the petitioner says that the petitioner applied in the name of Lakshya Outdoors and the respondents did not give the tender form as the petitioner had written to the respondents that the solvency certificate and everything has to be considered of Lakshya Media Pvt. Ltd. which is a Limited Company and Lakshay Outdoors Private Limited is its subsidiary/division. She has further averred that the petitioner company is dealing with various government offices and the respondents should have accepted the documents tendered by Lakshay Outdoors Pvt. Ltd. CWP No. 1591 of 2008 [2] On going through the record of the case, we find that the respondents have not considered the claim of the petitioner-company on the plea that Lakshay Outdoors Pvt. Ltd. has a separate identity. The petitioner ought to have applied in the name of Lakshya Media Pvt. Ltd. as the same is main concern and not in the name of any subsidiary or its division. There is no merit in this petition. Dismissed. (VIJENDER JAIN) CHIEF JUSTICE (KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA) JUDGE 4.2.2008 'ravinder'