IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT:: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CRL.P.No.2590 OF 2009 Between:: Kishan Gupta …Petitioner A n d State of A.P., Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad and another …Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CRL.P.No.2590 OF 2009 ORDER: This criminal petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing further proceedings against the petitioner/accused in Cr.No.133 of 2009 of Humayunnagar Police Station, Hyderabad. 2. Smt.Anitha, learned counsel, representing Sri Mohd. Moin Quadri, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the learned counsel has given up vakalat on behalf of the petitioner. None appears for the petitioner and no representation is made on his behalf. Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent/State. Perused the record. 3. On a complaint given by the 2nd respondent, police Humayunagar registered a case in Cr.No.133 of 2009 for the offence under Section 3(i)(x) of the Schedule Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Section 279 IPC. According to the complainant, who was a watchman, on 08.03.2009 at about 09.00 P.M., the petitioner/accused along with ten other persons came in two cars and wrote something on the wall of his house and when the complainant objected for the same, the petitioner/accused beat the complainant and his wife and also abused them in filthy language in the name of their caste and later the car was driven upon the wife of the complainant in a rash and negligent manner, as a result of which, she fell down and received injuries. 4. A perusal of the complaint would disclose that specific allegations have been made against the petitioner/accused prima facie attracting the ingredients of the alleged offences. The truth or otherwise of the said allegations can come out only after due investigation. Having regard to the nature of the offences alleged, it is considered not a fit case to invoke the inherent powers of the Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C and quash further proceedings against the petitioner/accused in pursuance of the F.I.R in Cr.No.133 of 2009. 5. In the result, the criminal petition is dismissed. Interim stay granted earlier by this Court stands vacated. __________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY 29th September, 2011 Lrkm