:1: :1: :1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 442 OF 2007 Shri Nandlal Pannalal Sisodiya ...Petitioner Versus Shri Murlidhar Shriram Shukla and Ors. ....Respondents ====== Mr.P.N.Joshi, Adv. for the petitioners. Mr.S.S.Kulkarni, Adv. for the respondents. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED: 30TH JANUARY, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. The Executing Court has observed that the petitioner’s objections cannot be taken cognisance of, inasmuch as, that would require the Executing court to go beyound the decree and reopen the matter concluded by it. That is plainly impermissible in law. Further, the petitioner pursued his remedy to challenge the decree in Appeal, but, that remedy was not sucessful. :2: :2: :2: The petitioner could not satisfactorily explain the cause of delay. In the light of the reaons assigned in the companion Writ Petition No. 266 of 2007, this petition also does not deserve to be entertained. It is accordingly dismissed. No costs. sd/- ********