.d 'e #9\ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI \ + w.P.(c) 732212008 UOI & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Jitendra Kr. Singh, Advocate versus CHARAN DAS & ORS. ..-.. Respondents Through /'\ coRAM: V HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SI]RESH KAIT ORDER i o 17.10.2008 The Petitioners are aggrieved by an Order dated 22"d F.ebruary,2008 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench in OA No.2038/2005. The direction given by the Tribunal is to the following effect: "In the result, for the foregoing reasons, OA is partly allowed. Impugned order is set aside. Respondents are directed to re-consider the request of applicants for grant of seniority from the date of ad hoc promotion with all consequential benefits to applicants by a speaking order to be passed within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It goes without saying that while such consideration would in inter alia include consideration the case of the w.P.(c) 7322/2000 Page 1 of 2 Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified i-i t a' decision in Mohinder Singh's case as well as constitution Bench decision ofthe Apex court referred to therein." A perusal of the above would show that the Respondents are only required to re-consider the case of the Petitioners and pass a speaking order. Needless to say, this direction is completely innocuous. We expect the Respondents to comply with this direction and pzNS a speaking order in A-1 accordance with law. The writ petition is dismissed. &J MADAN B. LOKTIR, J T'J ocToBER L7, 2008 mm { URESH KAI