Delay Condonation Application No. 5618 of 2011 Review Application No. 390 of 2011 in SPA No. 267 of 2008 Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J. Mr. Arvind Vashisth, Advocate for the appellants / applicants. Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary, Advocate for the respondent. Considering the averments made in the application for condonation delay in preferring the review application and being satisfied with the reasons furnished therein, we allow the application for condonation of delay in filing the review application. The judgment under review dated 15th February, 2011 recorded, “consequently, there is an irresistible conclusion that work is available which is required to be done on a daily basis”. In the review application, it is being contended that in the counter affidavit filed to the writ petition, it was stated that the writ petitioner – respondent was appointed on part-time basis as a sweeper, as and when work was available. In the writ petition, it was stated that the petitioner was being paid, for the work done by him, a fixed amount of ` 250/- per month. This assertion was not denied in the counter affidavit. Therefore, there was enough material on record to come to the said conclusion and the said conclusion was not, therefore, an error apparent on the face of the records. The review application is, accordingly, meritless and the same is dismissed. (Servesh Kr. Gupta, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 27.06.2011 Amit