^ H1GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. Misc.Appeal (Cl.No.1366/2007 Appellant Respondent 1. 2. 3. Nilesh Das, S/o Shri Lalit das, aged about 30 years, R/o Sector-9/15/1,Bhilai Nagar, Tahsil & District Durg (CG) ... Claimant VERSUS Rajendra Singh Padda, S/o Baldeo Padda, aged about 32 years, R/o Sindhiya Nagar Durg, Tahsil & District Durg (CG) .... DriveroftheVehicle Baldeo Singh Padda, S/o Shri Prem Singh Padda, R/o Sindhiya Nagar Durg, Tahsil 7 District Durg (CG) ....Owner of the Vehicle Divisional Manager National Insurance Company, Akash Ganga Supela Bhilai, Tahsil & Distrct Durg (CG) ...Jnsurer IVIisceUarLeoysLapDeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 Present: Shri P.R. Patankar, counsel forthe appellant. ORALORDER (Passedon30.11.2007) Heard on admission. 2. In this appeal for enhancement of compensation, the appellant/claimant is aggrieved by the award dated 30.7.2007 passed by the 8th Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (FTC) Durg (CG) in claims case No.17/2007, awarding a compensation of Rs.13,750/- in a case of grevious injury sustained by the claimant, due to the accident. 3. It is not disputed that the claimant did not adduce medical evidence and that he had suffered fracture of two toes of the left foot. )- 4. Learned M.A.C.T^ has awarded comensation under the following heads:- -^- ^K»»f' ^ i. Expenses towards pain & suffering ii. Expenses towards attendant iii. Expenses towards special diet iv. Expenses towards conveyance & travelling v. Expenses towards loss of montly Earning vi. Expenses actually incurred in treatment Rs.1994/- rounded offto TOTAL Rs.5,000/- Rs.1,500/- Rs.1,000/- Rs. 500/- Rs.3,750/- Rs.2,000/- Rs. 13,750/- 5. In my considered opinion that since no medical evidence was adduced by the claimant, the compensation awarded by the M.A.C.T. is just and reasonable and calls for no interference in-this__^peea[^which is accordingly dismissed at the stage of admission. /DilipRaosahebDeshmukh