SINSLE BEN6H <^>^^~ IN THB HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR W.P.(SINO. l.^.^ /2010 PETITIONERS r ^A'o/^ t^ \^~ y •^ v *^\-\^ ^' 1. Mukti Kumar Xalxo, S/o Abraham Xalxo, aged about 45 years, working as Assistant Teacher at T.W.D. Primary School, Barhatuku, Block- Farsabahar, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 2. Gregori Lakra, S/o Shri Alfons Lakra, aged about 42 years, working as Head Master, T.W.D. Primary School, Negitoli, Block- Farsabahar, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 3. Romanus Kujur, S/o Shri Albis Kujur, aged about 40 years, working as Head Master, T.W.D. Government Primary School, Jammunda, Farsabahar, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) ' f 4. ^ ^ p^1 RESPONDENTS ^•f ''-f/ w Smt. Elisaba Kujur, W/o Romanus Kujur, aged about 40 years, working as Head Master, T.W.D. Govt. Primary School, Bartoli, Block Farsabahar, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) / 5. Smt. Anna Kujur, W/o Pascal Kujur, aged bout 42 years, working as Head Master, T.W.D. Govt. Primary School, Panbahar, Block Farsabahar, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS ^ : 1 State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) / 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jashpur, Distt.- Jashpur (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Block -Farsabahar Distt. Jashpur(C.G.) /4. Treasury Officer, Treasury Account & Pension Jashpur, Distt.-Jashpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA / Petitioners HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION iS) N0.1596/2010 Mukti Kumar Xalxo and others Versus ^ Responderits State of Chhattisgarh and ofriers WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE226 OF THE CONSTiTUTION OF INDIA Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K.Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shrs Somkant Verma, counset for the petitioners. Shri iVi.P.S.Bhatia, Dy. G.A. fortheState. ORALORDER (Passed on this 12" of Aprii, 2010) 1. By this petition, the petitioners seek a direction to the respondente-to pay two advance increments on passing of B.T.I. examination, on their own expens<^, before entering into the service. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners sybmits that the issue involved in the present case is no longer r^ /ntegraQQ the same has been constdered and decided by the Supreme Court in Asha SQXBHQ K SWe ofM.P. & Oi^ as well as by this Court in the matter of Yashwant Kifmar BharBdwaj K Muniaipal Cwporation, Durg & anotiie/ and Gopesh Kumar Vesma K Tfw StQte Govt ofChhattisgarh Bndanothef . 3. Learned counsel further submits that the instant petition te squarety covered by the decislon as aforesteted- Thus, the petitioners may be permitted to make representations to the respondent authorities to decide thdir reapective cas^ for grarrt of two Jncrements in the iight of aforestated decision, subjwt to verifteation of the fact asto whefrier the petitioners have a^quirQd B.T.I., certifteate on their own expenses before entering into the service, 4. L^rned counset appearing for the State/respondente submsts that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation, the saine will be considered ar^d decided, in accordance with law and sn the IJght of the deci^ions of the Supreme Court in Asha Soxena (supra) as weil as this Court in YaBhwant KiimarBhQradwajB^ Gopesh Kumar Ve/ma (supfa), within a pertod of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 5. !n view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, nothsng survives in this petitionfor adjudication. __ 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dispDsed of. sd/- .. ... SatisbK.Agnibom Judge !2009airjMPJR(SC)59 22006CEI)MPJR-CG96 3WP(S)No.4l30of20&5