IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 21248 of 2008 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: December 23, 2008 Ramesh Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present: Mr. Sanjay S. Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. On 18.12.2008, the petitioner was granted time to produce on record documents to show that he was a regular employee and was not on contract basis. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to produce any document of that nature and instead has filed an application for amendment under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with an amended petition. Even in the C.W.P. No. 21248 of 2008 amended petition there is no document showing that the services of the petitioner has been regularised. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner requests for withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action by placing on record an order appointing him on regular basis. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty and the condition aforementioned. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (K. KANNAN) December 23, 2008 JUDGE Pkapoor 2