[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.2056 OF 2008 Sanjay Govind Ghandat ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.Shailesh Kantharia Advocate for Applicant Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JULY 29, 2008 DATE : JULY 29, 2008 DATE : JULY 29, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in CR No.I-33 of 2008 of Nerul Police Station, Dist.Thane. The said case is mainly under Sections 420 and 467 of IPC. 3. The applicant took co-accused Bhimrao and the wife of Bhimrao to the Bank and presented false and forged documents regarding purchase of flat no.301 at Navi Mumbai and obtained loan of Rs.4.5 lakhs. The applicant opened a false and fictitious bank [-2-] account in Konkan Mercantile Bank Vashi being Account No. 381. 4. The learned advocate for the applicant has submitted that almost entire amount has been handed over to Dattatray. However, the learned APP has pointed out that in fact Dattatray is the co-accused in the present case. The material on record shows that the applicant was instrumental in opening the bank account on the basis of forged documents and also obtaining loan on the basis of forged documents. Even though the amount may have been given by the present applicant to co-accused, the material on record clearly implicates the applicant. In my view, this is not a fit case to grant bail. 5. Application is rejected. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]