lcrt7 ^-—^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G) W.P. (S) N0. OF 2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS VERSUS :1 rf\^ c.^y .^•^' \ 4. Ram Kumar Yadav aged about 36 years, S/o Shri Bhogiram Yadav, Ex-Vyavsayik Anskalin Shikshak, R/o Chandani Chowk, Kududand, Tahsil & District Bilaspur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) The Director, Public Instruction, Raipur (C.G.) The Director, Panchayat & Social Welfare Department, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUION OFJNDIA ^°[ "41t41d'll, Qtlly'is, fq<>ll-LI'j,< —.....^[•..(?:...(^.)...£\C,?.:,6.6c2^J(y_ Wf. 200 SD^T -q^T (Tp^^tf) 3TI^( ^T h-U* ^H 3TR?T Sh^l<=h TOiiwdfsd sn^i z', SB : i 21.10.2010 Shri K.S.Pawar, counsel for th4 Shri Vivek Sharma, P.L, for th^ Grievance ot the petitioner i| though he has been selected for th4 Shikshak but has not besn conside) oost of Shiksha Karmi Grade III wlt have been extended the benefit of tHs Counsel for the petitioner su9 be served if direction is issued to the the pending representation of the pe| P/3 85 P/4). State counsel submits that 1| representation to the competent aut| decided in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petition is di^ petitioner to make a fresh represen) weeks from the date of receipt of coj same would be decided by the aut} period ofthree months. It is made clear that this Coutft on merits of the case and the authorjty to decide the reoresentation in accorc] '5CT^^'lflT1 THT^ff ^ t^^ <fol^:R ^i'siRnsn^i petitioner. State. |i the present petition is that post of Vyavsayik Anshkaleen t-ed for his appointment to the |iereas similariy placed persons Isaid post. [mits that ends of justice would |»mpetentauthority for deciding litioner dated 7.2.09 (Annexures ^t the petitioner make a fresh tiaoritv and the same would be Iposed of with a. direction to the tation within a period of three bv of this order and in tum the hiority concemed within further I; has not expressed any opinion concemed would be at liberty lance with law. Sd/- pritinker Diwakar Judge