CR No.8078 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.8078 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.04.2011 Ramesh Chopra ...Petitioner Vs. Sunil Kumar Gulati & Anr. ...Respondents BEFORE: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.Suvineet Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.B.R.Mahajan, Advocate, for the respondents. --- Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will not press this revision petition on merit in the eventuality, he is given some time to vacate the premises. Notice of motion was issued on 10.12.2010 for 22.3.2011. Till the next date of hearing dispossession was ordered to remain stayed, thereafter the case was adjourned for today with stay to continue. Today counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner may be given time to vacate the premises as he is in possession CR No.8078 of 2010 2 for the last 40 years and would require some time to reestablish in an alternative accommodation. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that his petition has been allowed on the ground of personal necessity so reasonable time may be granted to the petitioner. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case the petitioner is granted a period of six months from today subject to the condition that he will furnish an undertaking before the learned Rent Controller within 15 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order and shall deliver possession of vacant premises on or before 21.11.2011 and shall pay all the arrears of rent, if any due, and shall keep on paying the agreed rate of rent of the demises premises till October, 2011. It is made clear that arrears if any shall be paid within a period of one month from today. Revision petition is disposed of. (Rakesh Kumar Jain) 20.04.2011 JUDGE rp