IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Date: 9.3.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR Writ Petition No.5677 of 2011 N.Govinda Udayar. ... Petitioner vs. 1.The Secretary to Government, Adi Dravidar Welfare Department, St. George Fort, Chennai. 2.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Villupuram District. 3.The District Adi Dravidar, and Schedule Tribe Welfare Officer, Office of the Adi Dravidar and Schedule Tribe Welfare Office, Villupuram District. 4.The Special Thasildar, Adi Dravidar Welfare, Ulundurpet. ... Respondents Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to hold thorough enquiry into the acquisition proceedings and take action against the violators and misusers of the law. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Ramesh Kumar For Respondents : Mr.S.Shivashanmugam, Government Advocate. ----- https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ O R D E R Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to hold thorough enquiry into the acquisition proceedings and take action against the violators and misusers of the law. 2. Mr.S.Shivashanmugam, learned Government Advocate, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent of both parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 3. On 13.8.2010, the third respondent District Adi Dravidar and Schedule Tribe Welfare Officer issued a communication to the fourth respondent Special Tahsildar, Adi Dravider Welfare, Ulundurpet by communication Na.Ka.No.M5/95749/97 to enquire with regard to the complaint of the petitioner and file a report within fifteen days. Stating that the fourth respondent has not complied with the direction of the third respondent, the present writ petition has been filed to direct the authority to complete the enquiry and file a report. 4. Petitioner was also served with a copy of the above letter. After receiving the letter, the petitioner has not submitted a representation to the fourth respondent or sought for information whether the fourth respondent concluded the enquiry. 5. In such a situation, the petitioner is given liberty to make a representation to the fourth respondent in the light of the letter issued by the third respondent on 13.8.2010 and the fourth respondent shall consider the representation of the petitioner in the light of the letter of the third respondent District Adi Dravidar and Schedule Tribe Welfare Officer dated 13.8.2010 and take necessary steps in this regard forthwith as per law. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. ts Sd/- Asst. Registrar //True Copy// Sub Asst. Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ To 1.The Secretary to Government, Adi Dravidar Welfare Department, St. George Fort, Chennai. 2.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Villupuram District. 3.The District Adi Dravidar, and Schedule Tribe Welfare Officer, Office of the Adi Dravidar and Schedule Tribe Welfare Office, Villupuram District. 4.The Special Thasildar, Adi Dravidar Welfare, Ulundurpet. + 1 cc to Mr. S. Ramesh Kumar, Advocate SR No.17482 + 1 cc to Government Pleader, SR No.17259 VSN(CO) SR/19.3.2011 Order in W.P.No.5677 of 2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/