IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.8303 of 2011 Date of Decision : May 10, 2011. Naresh Kumar .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.S.K.Rattan, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks a mandamus for directing the respondents to allow him to change the option for increments and to step-up his pay at par with his juniors and also to release the consequential arrears alongwith interest. The above stated claim has been raised by the petitioner vide a legal notice dated 12.11.2010 (Annexure P-11) also, to which no response has been received so far. In these circumstances, however, without expressing any views on the petitioner's entitlement, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and dispose of the petitioner's claim as contained in the legal notice dated CWP No.8303 of 2011 [2] 12.11.2010 (Annexure P-11) by passing a speaking order within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. In case the petitioner is found entitled to any monetary benefits, the same shall also be released to him within a period of two months thereafter. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. May 10, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE