HKGH COURT OF CHHAETISGARH AT BILASPUR WP. No. 2642 of 2006 Petitiancr Smt. Mena Bai, wife of Shri Malikram, aged about 38 years, Gram Panchayat — Bilaigarh, District Raipur (CG) Vsrsus Respondents Smt, Gsnd Bai, Wife of Shri Ganshyam Patel, agcd about 31 years, resident afvillage Jevradih, Gram Panchayat — Singhichhua, ’l‘ahsilo Bilaigarh, District Kaipur (C.Gu) ' Smt. Pram Bai, wife of Shri Kammchand, Gram Panchayat — Singhichhua, Tahsil — Bilaigarh, Distm‘ct Raipur (C.Gr.) 3. Smt. Yashoda Bai, wife of not known, Gram Doto, ’l‘ah. Bilaigarh, District Raipur (C.G.) Smt. Rambai, wifc of not blown, Gram — Doto, Tahsil Bilaigarh, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Smt. Lamin Bai, wifc of not blown, Gram Panchayat Dots, . 'l‘ahsil Bilaigarh, Distt. Raipur {C.G.) .Smt.— Sakun Baj, Wifa of Munauram, Gram Panchayat Sillghichhua, Tall. Bilajgarh, Distt. Raipur (Cbhattisgarh) Returning Oiiicer, Polling Bcoth No. 1'27 Gram Panchayat — ‘ Singhichhua, ’1‘ahsil Bilaigarh, District Raipur (C.G.) 8. Returning Omcer, Polling Booth‘ Na. 128, Gram Panchayat Singhichhua, 'l‘ahsil Bilaigaxh, Distn'ct Raipur (C.G.) 9. Returning Officer, PoTHng Booth No. 129, Gram Pauchayat — Singh, Tahsil Bilaigarh, Distt. V Raipur(C.G.) 10. Presiding OKlcer (Pauchayat), ’l‘ahsil Bilaigarh, Distt. Raipur (C-G-} Sub Divisional OEcer, Bilaigarh, Distt. Kaipur {c.G‘) WRIT PETITGN UNDER ARTICLES 2261227 OF THE CNSTITUTION OF INDIA go $3: Hon’blc Shri Satish K. mihotri, J Shri Rajesh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shn' Viuay Harit, Deputy Advocate General for the respondents] State. 0 R D E R ( Passed on this 22nd day DfAngust, 2007) 1. By this patition, the petitioner sgeks a direction to the extent of compliamze of the onler dated 5.8.2005 passed in Wxit Petition No. 3472f2005 (Smt. Gendbai Vs. Smt. Meena Bai & others), Wharein this Court ordered as miderz- “In View of the above, the Specified OEcer before aimouncing the result Shail get these 15 votes examined by the chemical examiner axid thereafter, record his finding as to whether theie is any merit in the objection raised by the petitioner and there was any possibihty of manipulations after the original counting took place, and shah decide the election petition thereafter.” No Writ can be issued directing compliance of the order passed . 31x by this Court. The petitioner has other alternative forum seeking compliance of the order passed by this Comt by taking appropriate steps. There is no merit in the ease. 3. The petition is accommgly dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to take recourse to the alternative forum, that may he avaiiable to her. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri i Judge Thakur