THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.19416 OF 1997 ORAL ORDER: Though the matter is listed under the caption for dismissal, there is no representation for the petitioners. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. ______________​_ (G. ROHINI, J.) 25th February, 2008. Kgr IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE Ms JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.19416 of 1997 Between: 1. A. Appi Reddy S/o Rami Reddy. 2. G. Veerendranath S/o Nageswara Rao. ... Petitioners AND The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division, Ranga Reddy District, Domalguda, Hyderabad and others. .. Respondents. Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in cancelling our mutation vide his proceedings No.C/3222/97, dated 2.8.1997 as illegal, arbitrary and against the provisions of Section 5(a) of the R.O.R. Act and also violative of principles of natural justice and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may be deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.M. Prabhakara Rao (NP) Counsel for the Respondent No.: Mr.Suresh Shiv Sagar (for R5) Govt. Pleader for Revenue (for R1 to R3)