HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL. Writ Petition no. 1179 (S/B) 2002 Badri Singh Bhainsora & others ........ Petitioners Vs. State of Uttaranchal & others ......... Respondents. Sri Alok Mehra, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Manoj Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Hon'ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that similarly situated persons have already been promoted by respondent No. 2 on the post of Assistant Teacher in Junior High School. In this respect, the petitioners have already made representation before respondent No. 3. However, the fact that similarly situated persons have been promoted is not mentioned in that representation. Learned counsel for the petitioners has prayed that the petitioners may be permitted to make a fresh representation before respondent No. 3 for providing them promotion to the post of Assistant Teachers in Junior High School and the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 be directed to take decision on the representation of the petitioners within a specific period. Accordingly, I direct the petitioners to make a representation to respondent No. 3 stating all the grievances faced by them within fifteen days from today and the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 shall take decision on the representation of the petitioners within three weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order along with representation. With this direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (M.M. Ghildiyal, J.) November 18,2005: H.Negi