IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 948 of 2003 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 17/03/2003 in WP NO : 13737 OF 1997 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 The Govt. of India, rep.by its Secretary Ministry of Defence New Delhi 2 The Director General of Medical Services(Army)/DGMS-3D Adutant General's Branch, Army Headquarters 'L' Block, New Delhi-11001 3 The Commanding officer Army Medical Corps,Centre & School Lucknow, Uttarpradesh. 4 The Commanding Officer, CAD,(Pension) AMC AMC Allahabad, UP. 5 The Officer-in-charge sena chikitsa corps Abhilekh Army Medical corps Records, Lucknow-2(UP). ..... APPELLANT(S) AND Pammina Seetharam s/o.Lakshmaiah R/o.U.Kothapally Village & Mandal E.G.Dist. .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant:MR.M.RATNA REDDY (ADDL.S.C FOR C.G) Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.M.P.CHANDRAMOULI The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 948 of 2003 JUDGMENT : (Per Sri Justice B Prakash Rao) This appeal is filed at the instance of the Government of India and its Army wing against the orders of the learned single Judge dated 9.4.2002 in W P No. 13737 of 1997 disposing of the writ petition filed by the respondent herein directing the respondents/appellants herein to reinstate him with all consequential benefits as Sephoy. Taking into consideration the submissions made on behalf of the respondent/writ petitioner, the learned single Judge by going through the entire checkered events, ultimately permitted him to file a representation and same to be considered by the appellants herein in the light of the observations made therein. It is those observations, which are being aggrieved against. Hence, the appeal. It has been mentioned in ground no.”L” in the memorandum of grounds that the respondent/writ petitioner has already filed a representation and the same was disposed of by orders dated 25.11.2002. In view of disposal of the representation of the writ petitioner, nothing survives in the appeal. It is needless to mention that any observations made would not come in the way of the authorities to pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law. Subject to above observation, the writ appeal stands dismissed. No costs. B.PRAKASH RAO,J SANJAY KUMAR,J Date: 5.8.2009 tvk THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 948 of 2003 Date: 5.8.2009