S: c ^' 1 00 IN THE HI6H COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR. CHHATTISGARH W.P.fClNo. ^^o /2010 PETITIONER : ^fe^ ^1-^^-" RESPONDENTS : "Sri Rawatpura Sarkar Institute of Professional Studies (D. El. Ed. Course)" over Khasara No. 581/2, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh Represented through: Its Registrar & Shri Authorized Signatory Shri B.K. Shrivastava, aged about 55 years, R/o. Kumhari Chowk, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh VERSUS 2. National Council forTeachers Education (A statutory body of Government of India) Through: Its Member Secretary, Hans Bhawan, Wing-II, 1 Bahadur Shah Jafar Marg, New Delhi 110002 National Council for Teacher Education (A statutory body of Government of India), Western Regional Committee, Through: The Regional Director, Manas Bhawan, Shyamla Hitls, Bhopal(M.P. ). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA _.^_--.-—- n^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BjLASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0.3390 OF 2010 'PETITIONER RESPQNDENTS Sri Rawatpura Sarkar Institute of Professional Studies (D.EI.Ed. Course) Versus National Council for Teachers Education & Another Gowri (Writ Petition underArticle 226/2270fthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Kishore Bhaduri and Shri Rahul Tamaskar, Advocates for the petitioner. Shri Bhaskar Payashi, Advocate for the respondents. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 3rd day ofAugust, 2010) 1. At the very outset, Shri Tamaskar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that having regard to the fact that the . academic session is to begin, the petitioner may bepermitted to make a detailed r^presentation to the respondent No.2 for grant of recognition,as the petitioner's institute satisfies with each and every requirement. 2. At this juncture, Shri Payashi, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, submits that if a fresh application is made by the petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law and on its own merits, within a period oftwo weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, if any. 3. In view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge