IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WPSS No. 925 of 2008 Ram Pal Singh …………..Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand & Another. ……………..Respondents. Mr. Paresh Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 16th September, 2008 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has prayed for a writ of Mandamus commanding the respondent no. 1 to decide the representation dated 2.6.2008 forwarded to him by the respondent no.2 vide its letter dated 12.6.2008 contained in Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition. 2. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that he has no objection, if the writ petition is disposed of finally. 3. Therefore, without going into the merits of the controversy, writ petition is disposed of with the direction that respondent no. 1 shall decide the representation dated 2.6.2008 moved by the petitioner within a period of one month from the dated of production of certified copy of this order., 4. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is finally disposed of. (P.C. Verma, J.) 16.9.2008 Rathour