IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.: 8315 of 2010 alongwith CWP Nos.8263, 8264, 8265, 8275,8316, 8317 & 8320, of 2010. Decided on: 01.08.2011. _______________________________________________ 1. CWP No.8315 of 2010. Sanjeev Kumar versus State of H.P. and Others. 2. CWP No.8263 of 2010. Sakinder Singh versus State of H.P. and Others. 3. CWP No.8264 of 2010. Jeet Singh versus State of H.P. and Others. 4. CWP No.8265 of 2010. Uttam Chand versus State of H.P. and Others. 5. CWP No.8275 of 2010. Swaroop Singh versus State of H.P. and Others. 6. CWP No.8316 of 2010. Madan Lal versus State of H.P. and Others. 7. CWP No.8317 of 2010. Jagdev Singh versus State of H.P. and Others. 8. CWP No.8320 of 2010. Bachiter Singh versus State of H.P. and Others. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No - 2 - Since common questions of law and facts are involved in all these petitions, the same are taken up together and are being disposed of by a common judgment. 2. Case of the petitioners, in a nutshell, is that since they have completed ten years continuous service with 240 days in each calendar year, they are required to be regularized or given work charge status from due date. However, it is evident from the orders passed by the Additional Chief Secretary (Forest) that petitioners have not worked continuously for ten years with 240 days in a block of twelve calendar months. In order to get regularization/work charge status, it is necessary for an incumbent to complete ten years continuous service with 240 days in a block of twelve calendar months. Consequently, this Court will not interfere in the orders dated 17.9.2010. 3. Mr. Onkar Jairath prays for and is permitted to withdraw the petitions in order to enable the petitioners to make representation(s) to respondent No.1 for the redressal of their grievances. 4. Accordingly, the petitions are disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make representation(s) to respondent No.1 within a period of three weeks from - 3 - today. Thereafter the same shall be considered and decided sympathetically by respondent No.1 by looking into the regularization policy, more particularly, mandays’ chart. No costs. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. 1.8.2011. *awasthi*.