^^^ SSNK^: S.B. (Service Matter) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION (S) N0. \V ' /2011. PETITIONER: Respondents ^ •N\- . ^<y ^ '..\^v" ^ ...-•^ 's-' <c-" ^-- .--•?• . Ravi Bhaskar Saha, son of Late Jayant Kuinar Saha, aged about 19 years, residence ofVrindayan Colony, In front of R.E.C. Colony, Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh. versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretaiy, Health and Family Welfare Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Director, Medical Educadon, Old Nurses Hostel, D.K.S.Bhawan, Complex, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. /- 3. Director Health Services, Sanchanalaya, Health Services, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. -^4. Chief Medical and Health Officer, Bastar, District Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh. ^ 5. Joint Director cum Supenntendent, Govt. Medical College, Maharani Hospital, Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA o^/ •^ .-'f.'1 -c^ ','"8^~J''V ^ ^"t' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRST PET!TtON (S) N0.1344 OF 2011 PETIT10NER Ravi Bhaskar Saha RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) SingSe Bsnch : Hon'bto Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri C.J.K. Rao, Advocaie for th®petitioner. Shri Sushi! Dubey, Govemment Ad'/ocate for the Stats. QRD£R(ORAy (Passed on this 11"' day of March, 2011) 1. Learned counsel apDearina for the oetitioner submits that the petitioner has made an application on 18/05/2009 for appointment on comDassionate basis on account of death of his father Jayant Kumar Saha, who was working as Store Keeper at Government Maharanl Hospital-cum-Medica! College, Jagdalpur died on 28/02/2009, but tili date no order has been passed. 2. Learned counsel further submits that as it has been held in a catena of decisions that obiect of aDDointment on comDassionate basis is to provide succor and relief immediateiy on the death of the deceased employee. By not passlng the order, ttie authorities are defeatina the Durooss of comDassionate aDpointment. 3. Shri Dubey, leamed Government Advocate appearing fbr the State submits that the respondents would take decision in accordanoe with law preferably within a period of three weeks and wil! pass the order. in accordance with law. 4. In view of the above, accordma to learned counsel apDearino for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication at this stage. 5. Accordingty, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- SattehK.Agnib" itn ifnia