004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF 3UDICATURE AT BILASPUR fCHHATTISGARH) ^inral^ F WRIT PETITION N0. ^8' OF 2006 !^^^^ PETITIONER ^.s.-^^ ^-^s^^"...^^ ...•"••"^Asy""^....-••"" ^^:>' D. K. Banswar, S/o Late Sri B. R. Banswar, aged about 47 years, presently working as Pariyojana Adhikari, Zila Shahari Vikas Abhikaran, Raipur [Chhattisgarh] RESPONDENTS ^^ ^ VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Department of Urban Administration & Development, Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. Zila Shahari Vikas Abhikaran Through District Collector, Raipur [Chhattisgarh] |V(T.-fL^<i(<ur3-^M.UniciPal cc)uncil' Mungeli Through its Chief Municipal Officer, Mungeli, District (^' 'OU- ^^c^i( 0<^>urt^ ewn-'ijitlwea .^L\'l"~^ in^iLic^^ C^II.P-I^ ^^<-w<'"^ ^ fL^;^ ' -^ ^ ^^ •y1 ..•>•- ^£^<'s L^ fi-V^ur/ Bilaspur [Chhattisgarh] /\^ s^ ^^^ ^%RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE ^ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMU& PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS. DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. ORDER—QS ORDERS: The petitioner, above-named, most respectfully begs to submit as under: -' XI-HC-22 ^51 ^l'-lld^, ei^lti'l'a, ]'s«t!'Mll< ^ .,^t aii^r^iT h-Hck 3D$?I ^RT^"?rf?^ sii^i'FRnwtrfs? ^'!l-4l(;Nt'] 'W^ff ^ 'f^t <F<^K ^3TfSOT31I^I 9-1-2006 Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, counsef Shri R.K. Mishra.Govt. Advocafe, Application for urgent hearing is| Heard on I.A. No.302/2006 foriit Leamed counsel for the pe( typographical error in the amendment] place of the name "Mr. J.L. Thakur"! been wrongly typed. He prays for perrtiission . The permission is granted. Th^ So far as I.A. No.302/2006 for ihiplead is allowed. Mr. J.L. Thakur, Dy. be joined as party. Cause title be amefided. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitiojier been transferred from the office Development, Raipur to the office Annex.P/3 dated 28/12/2005. It is made representations (Annex.P/4 & considered. Learned counsel for the State transfer is an exigency of service transferred. fo.r the petitioner. Advoca<e, for the State, on advance copy. allowed. ii|npleading as party. titioner submits that there is a application. It issubmitted that in the name "Mr. J.R. Thakur" has to correct the name. name be corrected accordingly. i|npleading as party is concerned, it Commissi^ner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur clf submits that the petitioner has Project OfRcer, District Urban l\4unjcipal Council, Mungeli as per Isubmitted that the petitioner has P/5) but the same have not been <>n atid the other hand submits that the the petitioner has been n'ghtly [Tft^ tf(S(4 XI-HC-22 ~3^ "l(!*<lc'l<4, »Tii'y'is, (««II'HI<. sn^i^i h-u* sn^f StiHich •Hf^ff I- ^yyf ^ 311^'^SIIWHfitf -^- At this stage, iearned coun present the petitioner may be gi representation before the competent lauthority of the respondents, which shall be considered on its own merits in accoi Prayer is not opposed by the tlance with law. itate counsel. Having considered and witho|Lrt expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, in the opinion of this Court, given tothe [Setitioner to make a d< before the competent authority of petition and this order, within 15 d^ being filed, thecompetent authority its own tnerits in accordancewith l^ months from the date of receipt of th^ relieved from the present piaceofcj 1Wlfepft!T llTlTCTf •? feist ^TRIT •^7 3TfitTlT3n^I el for the petitioner submits that for the 'en an opportunity of filing the detailed ends of justice will be served if a direction is •tailed representation raising his grievances he respondents along with a copy of the lys from today, and on such representation >fthe respondentsshall decide the same &n w as eariy as possible preferably within two representation. Learned counselor the petitiij)nersubmits that the petitioner has not beeh sting and he has stated it in application fer interim relief. He prays that the petitiij>ner may be allowed to continue. It is directedthat if the petitiojier has not been relieved, he may be allowed to continue till the representation is has already been relieved, this ordi earlier place of posting. With the aforesaid observatiohs, this petition stends disposed of. Consequently M.W.P.No. 81 Certified copy as per rules. deeided. It is made clear that ifthe petitioner r will not entitle the petitioner to rejoin at the [2006 alsostands disposed of. Sd'- Fakhruddin Judge [Tft^ ^F®^