géggg (”gig/c736 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (s) No‘ $31 OF 2009 PETITIONER:- Prahiad Harihamo, S/O Shri Ganesh Prasad Hariharno, aged about 42 years, OccupaTion- Peon at Municipal Council, Raigarh, R/O Nawagarhi, Raigarh, DisTricT Raigarh, (C.G.) State of ChhaTTisgarh, Through Secre‘l‘ary, Nagriya Prashashan Department, D.K.s. Bhawan Raipur, DisTr-icf— Raipur‘, (C.G.) CollecTor, Raigarh, District— Raigarh, (C.G.) Chief Municipal Officer, Through Municipal Corpora‘rion, Raigarh, DisTricT- Raigar‘h, (C.G.) Jan Soochna Adhikari, Municipal Corporafion, Raigarh, District Raigarh, ’(C.G.) OF INDIA 1. Particulars of the petitioner: As stated in the cause title. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CON$ITITUTION l 2. Particulars of the Respondents: As stated in the cause title. u': , (Writ Petition under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Awadh Tripathi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.V. Sridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH :BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.3537 OF 2009 Shri Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate for the respondents No.3 & 4. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 27th day of April, 201 1) Learned counsei appearing for the respondents submit that in the instant petition the petitioner has mainly prayed for a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the representation dated 20-12—2001 and in alternative, issue a writ in the nature of certiorari has been sought for. The respondents‘have no objection, if the substantive prayer is granted to the petitioner. Accordingly, if the representation dated 20-12-2001 has not been considered and decided till date, the Collector is directed to consider the same in accordance with law and on its own merits after affording proper opportunity of hearing to all the parties. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will appear before the Collector on 17-5—2011 along with all the document and evidence, if any. Thereafter, the representation may be considered and deiced within a reasonable time and appropriate order may be passed. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/— PSatish K. Agnihotri ‘ Judge Gowri PETITIONER Prahlad Hasriharno Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others