IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18682 of 2010 NIRAJ KUMAR, SON OF LATE SUBODH KUMAR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. RAM AWATAR YADAV, SON OF LATE HANSH RAJ YADAV ----------- 2. 24.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The present application has been filed for cancellation of bail granted to the opposite party No. 2 by an order dated 8.3.2010 vide Cr. Misc. 1016 of 2010 on two grounds; firstly, that there has been a suppression of facts and secondly that there are threats meted out by the opposite party No. 2 to witnesses. On the first ground, the counsel for the petitioner concedes that from the order challenged, it cannot be demonstrated that there has been any suppression of facts whereas on the second ground, it is directed that in case the court below receives any complaint about the opposite party No. 2 threatening the witnesses, an enquiry should be done in the matter and suitable action be taken thereafter. With this observation, the application is disposed of. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)