CRM No.M-18737 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:22.06.2011 Subhash Jain ....petitioner Versus State of Haryana .....respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present: Mr.Munish Behl, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Dhruv Dayal, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana **** RITU BAHRI, J.(ORAL) Counsel for the petitioner contends that one Alto Car has been recovered from the premises of the petitioner, where sale of the second hand car was being conducted. The owner of the car was Rajinder Kumar, who had parked the car for sale and the petitioner has nothing to do except getting permission. Counsel for the respondents on instructions from SI Kulwant Singh has informed the Court that no recovery is to be effected from the petitioner so far. However, since the car was parked in his premises, he should join the investigation. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and in the event of the arrest of the petitioner, he shall be released on bail on his furnishing adequate bail/surety bonds in the sum of ` 20,000/- to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to the following conditions: 1. a condition that the person shall make himself available for interrogation by Police Officer as and when required; CRM No.M-18737 of 2011 2 2. a condition that the person shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; 3. a condition that the person shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court; 4. such other condition as may be imposed under sub Section(3) of Section 437, as if the bail were granted under that section. Petition disposed of. (RITU BAHRI) JUDGE 22.06.2011 neenu