IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD FEBRUARY 2010 / 14TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 3553 of 2010(O) ------------------------- OS.444/2008 of ADL.SUB COURT, THALASSERY .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- M.P.PRASANTH, S/O.NARAYANAN, AGED 52 YEARS, 'SADANANDA VILLA', TELLICHERRY AMSOM, MANNAYAD DESOM, P.O.NETTUR, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN SRI.V.VENUGOPAL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SREE CHIRAKKAKAVU BHAGAVATHI KSHETHRAM, TELLICHERRY AMSOM, MANNAYAD DESOM, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 2. SREE CHIRAKKAKAVU BHAGAVATHI KSHETHRAMDHARMA SAMITHI, TELLICHERRY AMSOM, MANNAYAD DESOM, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT. 3. MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD, CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT. 4. P.LAKSHMANAN, S/O.LATE KUNHAMBU, RETIRED HEAD MASTER, 'KALA', P.O.NETTUR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * W.P. (C ) No. 3553 of 2010 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 3rd February, 2010 JUDGMENT The Writ petitioner, who is the first plaintiff in O.S.444 of 2008 on the file of the Sub Court, Thalassery challenges Ext.P4 order passed by that Court in I.A. No. 4689 of 2008 as per which the plaintiff sought the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner for the purpose of Administration of Chirakkal Kavu Bhagavathy Temple, Thalassery. 2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent Malabar Devaswom Board. 3. The Court below has given weighty reasons as to why the application filed by the petitioner was not liable to be entertained. I see no reason to interfere with Ext.P4 order passed by the court below. This Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) ani.