PETtTSGNER HJGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH : BILASPUR WRJT PETITION (Sl N0.2018 OF 2009 Birendra Kumar Patet. S/o Late Shri Arjun Patel, aged about 20 years, R/o village Chandibhona, Post Pateendry, Tehstl Saraipaii. District Mahasamund (CG). RESPONDENTS Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, District Raipur (CG). 2. District Education Officer. Mahasamund, Distriot Mahasamund (CG). 3. Block Educatlon Offtcer. Mahasamund. Distriot Mahasamund (CG). 4. State of Madhya Pradesh. through Secretary, Generai Administration Department, Vailabh Bhawan, Bhopal, DistrictBhopa((MP). (Writ petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of fndia) Singte Bench : Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:• Shri Awedh Tripathi, counsel forthe petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur. Dy. Adv. Generat vwth Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State. Gowri ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 17m day of Aprif, 2009) With the consent of learned counse! appearing for the parties, the petition is heard finalty. 2) - Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not v^ant to contest the matter on merit, at this stage. However, learned counsej prays that the r^pondent authorities may be directed to consjder the pending representation/appiicatjon ofthe petitionerwjthin a stipulated period. 3) Shri Thakur, learned Dy. Adv. Genera! appearing with Shri Dubey. teamed Panei Lavvyer for the State. submits that if the representation/ application of the petitioner is pending, the same shail be considered and decided in accordance with law, on its own merits. as early as possible preferabiy within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4) in view of the foregoing, according to iearned counsel for the petitioners, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 5) Accordingly, the vvrit petition stands disposed of. ____—_-— SdJ- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge