IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1583 of 2006 BRAJ NANDAN PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4 31.07.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. In principle, a decision dated 10.5.2005 was taken to make the service conditions of the employees of the respondent’s Bihar State Hindu Religious Trust Board, at par with the State Government which is evident from Annexure – 2, but this is subject to final approval and notification in this regard by the State Government. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Trust Board whereby a communication dated 20th September, 2006 has been brought on record. This certifies the position that the decision taken by the Board has not attained finality as well as it has not been implemented in absence of a Gazette notification. The reasons stated are that certain infirmities have been found in the same. In view of the above, no direction can be issued upon the respondents to enhance the age of retirement of its employees to 60 years at this stage, but it is open to the Trust Board to take cognizance of the letter 2 dated 20th September, 2006 and may be taken steps for removing the incongruity so that the necessary action can be taken by the respondent State. Only when the above is done right may accrue to the petitioner. The matter is premature at this stage. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations. Rajeev/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)