:1: IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1267 OF 2008 Rolta India Ltd. ...Appellant. Vs. The Jt. Commissioer of Icome tax. ...Respodent. Mr. S.G.Dalal for the Appellant. Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for the Respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATE : 6TH FEBRUARY,2009. PC : 1. The assessee has taken out this praecipe for speaking to the minutes of the order to point out that there is clearly typographical error in the second sentence of the order dated 17.1.2009. 2. Considering the order passed in Income Tax Appeal No.238 of 2006, the question of law ought to have been answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. In the light of that, following order. 3. The second sentence "Considering that the question of law as framed wound not arise. Consequently appeal dismissed" be omitted and substituted by following sentence. "Considering that the question of law as framed is answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. Consequently, appeal allowed". :2: 4. The Prothonotary & Sr.Master of this court to carry out the said correction and issue certified copy accordingly. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)