BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Nineteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.15917 of 2011 1 K.THANGARASU, 2 S.MUTHUSAMY, ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ECONOMIC OFFENCES WING, TIRUVARUR.(CR.NO.2/2011) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. G.KARNAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.C.RAMESH, Addl.Public Prosecutor(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 409, 408, 467, 468, 471, 477(A) r/w 120(B) of IPC in Crime No.2/2011 on the file of the respondent police and seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been arrayed as A-8 and A-29 and they have been implicated in this case on the allegation of misappropriation of Government fund. He further submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitions have been implicated in this case on the allegation that the first petitioner is said to have misappropriated a sum of Rs.1,74,000/- and the second petitioner is said to have misappropriated a sum of Rs.13,900/-. He further submitted that the investigation is pending. 4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 5. It is seen that the petitioners have been implicated in this case on the allegation, as stated above. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Papanasam, Thanjavur https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ District on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police for a period of four weeks daily at 5.30 p.m., and thereafter they shall be available for interrogation as and when required. Sd/- 19/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PAPANASAM, THANJAVUR 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ECONOMIC OFFENCES WING,TIRUVARUR. 3 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. G.KARNAN Advocate SR.No.44458 ssk/21.12.2011 /5c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15917 of 2011 Date :19/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/