IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI TUESDAY, THE 4TH AUGUST 2009 / 13TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 21939 of 2009(J) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- 1. JAMEELA, W/O. LATE A.K.KUNJU MUHAMMED, ELAMANA HOUSE, PUTHUVASSERYKARA, CHENGAMANAD VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. LEENA K.MUHAMMED, D/O. LATE A.K.KUNJU MUHAMMED, ELAMANA HOUSE, PUTHUVASSERYKARA, CHENGAMANAD VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. ANIL K.MUHAMMED, S/O. LATE A.K.KUNJU MUHAMMED, ELAMANA HOUSE, PUTHUVASSERYKARA, CHENGAMANAD VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.S.MOHAMMED AL RAFI RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- THE SUB REGISTRAR, CHENGAMANAD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER P. NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No. 21939 of 2009 -------------------------- Dated this the 4th August,2009 J U D G M E N T Ext.P1 partition deed executed among the petitioners was presented before the respondent for registration. But the respondent declined to register the same on the premise that the property sought to be partitioned is not valued property. 2. As considered and held by this Court in Exts.P2 and P3 judgments and several other judgments, the competent authority under the Registration Act is not entitled to refuse registration on the ground of alleged undervaluation. He shall therefore register the original of Ext.P1 on presentation without prejudice to his right to take appropriate steps under Section 45B of the Stamp Act. Writ petition is disposed of as above. (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma 2 3