IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA. MJC No.2922 of 2009 DR. MEET VERMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ----------- 3. 8-09-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Nobody appears on behalf of State. The only grievance of the petitioner is that after disposal of his prayer to accept his joining and for regularizing the period of absence, another representation contained in annexure-2 is not being disposed of by the authority. In that representation petitioner has prayed for grant of regular salary for the period after 1-7-2003 till his date of joining 28-12-2006. This prayer was not under consideration of the writ court at the time of passing of the order contained in annexure-1. Hence, the contempt application is finally disposed of with a direction to the concerned opposite parties to dispose of the representation of the petitioner contained in annexure-2 within a reasonable period, 2 preferably within three months from the date of production/communication of a copy of this order. Naresh ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)