IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 67/1997 The Manager, Bata Shoe Store, Bikaner & Ors. Vs. The Prescribed Authority Cum Regional Dy.Labour Commissioner & Anr. ......... Date of Order : 26/11/2008 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. Mukesh Rajpurohit for the petitioners. Mr. R.S.Saluja for the respondent. BY THE COURT By the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the order dated 06.05.1996 passed by respondent No.1 the Prescribed Authority under the Rajasthan Shops and Commercial Establishment Act, 1958 (for short 'the Act of 1958' hereinafter) has been challenged by the petitioners employer. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. On a claim filed by the respondent No.2 workman before the respondent No.1 The Prescribed Authority under the Act of 1958, the claim was adjudicated and the respondent No.1 The Prescribed Authority under the Act of 1958 on appreciation of the material and the evidence placed before it, came to the conclusion that the termination of the respondent workman was illegal, however, subsequently, the respondent workman came to be appointed in Avas Vikas Sansthan and therefore, a compensation of Rs.16,500/- in lieu of reinstatement was allowed. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the compensation has already been paid to the workman. Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties and on careful perusal of the order Annex.1, in my view, the order impugned does not suffer from any error, illegality warranting interference invoking extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court. I do not find any good ground to interfere with the order impugned. The writ petition is therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp S.B.CIVIL MISC. SECOND STAY PETITION NO. 677/98 IN S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 67/97 Date of Order : 26/11/2008 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. Mukesh Rajpurohit for the petitioners. Mr. R.S.Saluja for the respondent. Since the writ petition itself has been dismissed, the second stay petition also stands dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp