IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No.35075 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 21, 2011 Rupinder Singh & another ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Ms.Anita Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. Though no proper age proof of petitioner No.1 has been furnished except the affidavit, but this is a case where both the petitioners were engaged by the families earlier from which the family of the girl is going back. In this background, the petitioners have performed their marriage, which is apparently in presence of some of the relatives of the boy. In view of these peculiar facts, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the Senior Superintendent of Police, S.A.S.Nagar (Mohali) to look into the complaint of the petitioners and in case he finds that there is any threat to their life and liberty, he will take appropriate action on the said complaint. Senior Superintendent of Police, S.A.S.Nagar (Mohali) would be at liberty to ask the petitioners to reimburse the cost of protection in case it is required to be provided to the petitioners. The present order, however, shall not be deemed to be proof qua the factum/validity of their matrimonial alliance. November 21, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE