1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6392/2009 Mushtak Ali vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER: 8.7.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. Sikandar Ali, for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner was given permanent status vide order dated 9.8.2004 w.e.f. 19.8.1998 then matter was considered in proper perspective and, thereafter, detailed order was passed on 25.5.2006 (Annex.3) so as to make all the corrections in the status of all the employees who were initially appointed on daily wages basis and who were entitled to semi-permanent status after completion of 2 years of service and entitled to permanent status after completion of 10 years of service. By the subsequent order Annex.3, the petitioner was assigned the status of semi-permanent from 18th July, 1990 in place of assigning of semi-permanent status from 1.1.1995 thereby the petitioner was benefited. Then vide order dated 20.12.2006, it was directed that the employee shall be entitled for selection scale on completion of 9, 18 and 27 years of service. The 2 grievance of the petitioner is that though the order has been passed in favour of the petitioner but the petitioner yet has not been actually given the benefit of services for which the petitioner submitted the representation by sending a notice for demand of justice dated 28th July, 2007. Since the orders are in favour of the petitioner, referred above, and if any benefits has not been given to the petitioner then the respondents may consider the representation of the petitioner which he may now sent afresh to the State Government so that State Government may take a decision on the grievance raised by the petitioner and the State Government may communicate the decision taken by them on petitioner's representation. The representation may be decided by brief reasoned order. The petitioner may submit the representation within a period of one month from today, which may be decided by the State Government within a period of three months thereafter. Hence, the writ petition of the petitioner is disposed of accordingly. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-