WP(C) 9214/2004 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY The petitioner challenges the order dated 30.11.2004 issued by the Inspe ctor of Schools, whereby the transfer order was issued to respondent No.5 was st ayed. While admitting this case, the Court had passed interim order on 24th Janu ary 2005 staying the operation of the impugned order pertaining to transfer of t he private respondent. Today when the case is called out, none is present on behalf of the peti tioner. Perhaps by afflux of time, there is no live issue remains to be adjudica ted in the matter. Be that as it may, in view of the absence of the petitioner’s lawyer, th e case is dismissed for non-prosecution.