1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7113/2007 (Vinod Arjun Wagh Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : S.B.DESHMUKH & K.U.CHANDIWAL ,JJ. DATE : 25th August, 2010. ... 1) Heard Mr.AS Sawant, learned Counsel for petitioner and Mr.KS Patil, learned AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 4. 2) The petitioner approached to this Court with following prayers : “A) The Hon’ble High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 to take the appropriate action against the respondent nos. 3 and 4 for not supplying the information as prayed by the petitioner within stipulated period as well as to take the appropriate action against the respondent nos. 3 and 4 for supplying the scanty and incomplete information as prayed by the petitioner; (B) The Hon’ble High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no. 3 to furnish the relevant information tot he petitioner as prayed by the petitioner by way of preferring the Second Appeal on 19.8.2007 as early as possible. (C) Pending hearing and final disposal 2 of this writ petition, the Hon’ble High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no.2 to take the appropriate action against the respondent nos. 3 and 4. for not supplying the information as prayed by the petitioner within stipulated period as well as to take the appropriate action against the Respondent nos. 3 and 4 for not supplying the information as prayed by the petitioner within stipulated period as well as to take appropriate action against the respondent nos. 3 and 4 for supplying the scanty and incomplete information as prayed by the petitioner. (D) Pending hearing and final disposal of this writ petition, the Hon’ble High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no.3 to furnish the relevant information to the petitioner as prayed by the petitioner by way of preferring the Second Appeal on 19.8.2007 as early as possible. 3) The principal prayer made by the petitioner in this petition is, direction against the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 for supplying the information as sought for. The grievance is raised that information sought for and its details are not supplied to the petitioner. 4) Mr.Sawant learned Counsel for the petitioner explained the subsequent development having taken place after filing of the writ petition. On 3 instructions from the petitioner, he made a statement today that the information sought for has been supplied to the petitioner and, therefore, the grievance of the petitioner in this regard stands redressed. The statement is accepted and take on record. 5) Learned AGP also pointed out the affidavit in reply filed on behalf of Respondent no.3. 6) In view of this submission, nothing remains to be adjudicated upon in this writ petition. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) (S.B.DESHMUKH) JUDGE JUDGE bdv/