( g o HIGH CGURT OF CHHATTiSGARi—I: BILA$PUR Writ PeEition ($3 No. 1 191 of 2987 {Writ Petition under Amcie 2'26 of the Censtiiution 0f indie) SB: Hon’bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihoiri, J. Shri HS. Ahuiuwa§ia, caunse! fer the petitioner. Smt. Smite Ghai, Pane? Lawyer far the State, ?reseni: QRAL ORDER {i’assed on 13-3-20a8) Learned counsei appearing for the petii‘ioner submiie mat the petitioner be permitted to make a representation to the effect that the petitioner is entitled to benefit of reguiar gangman, in view of the observations made in Para t3 by this Court in WP‘No. 10812605 (Govind & others Vs. State ot C.G. & others) { 2007 (2) C.G.L.J. 29}, to which iearned counsei appearing for the respondentsfState has no objection. 2} Aocordingiy. the petition is disposed of with the above stated iiberty. Sd/— i Satish K. Agnihotri i Judge 9 i Petitioner Lekhram Verma, Sio. Late Pyare:al Verma. Aged about 31 years, R/a‘ Viliage Nayakarela, PD. Dhara, RS. Bangargam, Gistt. Ra§nandgaen €CG). Ves’sus Respondents 1) Siaie of Chhattisgarh! thmugh the Secretary, PubHc Works Department, D.K.S. Bhawah, RaEpur{C ). 2) Chief Engineer PWD Departmeht, D.K.8. Bhawan, Raipur (CG), 3} Suserintendent Engineer, FWD, Durg Mandal, Dist, Durg‘ 4) Execuiive Engineer, PWD (8&R) Khairagarh Divi$ian, Khairagarh (CG).