IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 5930 of 2008. Decided on 29.06.2010. _____________________________________________________ Bhavneshwari. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate vice Mr. D.R. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents No. 1 to 3. : Mr. P.M. Negi and Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate Generals. For respondent No. 4 : Mr. A.K. Dhiman, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner had already completed her normal tenure at the present place of posting. However, taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is a widow and her son is 40% disabled, she is permitted to make a representation to respondent No. 2, i.e., Director of Health, Shimla within a period of three weeks from today. Thereafter, the same shall be decided by the respondent No. 2 within a further period of six weeks after the receipt of certified copy of this judgment. Till the representation is decided, the petitioner shall be permitted to work at the present place of posting. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? With the aforesaid observations/directions, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. Copy dasti, on usual terms. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge June 29, 2010. (bhupender)