In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh R. F. A No. 2222 of 2004 (O&M) Rajender Singh and another ... Appellants vs State of Haryana and others .... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Rishav Mahajan, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. D. D. Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal J. The landowners have filed the present appeal seeking enhancement of compensation. Briefly, the facts are that vide notification dated 11.5.1992, issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act'), the State of Haryana acquired land in Village Garhi Brahmanan, Hadbast No. 203, Tehsil and District Sonepat, for development and utilisation thereof as construction of Water Works at Sonepat. The same was followed by notification issued under Section 6 of the Act on 5.5.1993. The Land Acquisition Collector assessed the market value of the acquired land @ ` 3,00,000/- per acre. Dissatisfied with the award of the Collector, the landowners filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned court below upheld the award of the court below. It is this award which is impugned in the present appeal. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the issue involved in the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of this court in RFA No. 594 of 2000 – Rajinder Singh through LRs and others vs State of Haryana and another, decided on 5.9.2009, whereby the compensation payable for land acquired vide same notification was enhanced to ` 104/- per square yard. Learned State counsel did not dispute the aforesaid factual position. For the detailed reasons recorded in Rajinder Singh's case (supra), the present appeal is disposed of in the same terms. 11.11.2010 (Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge