IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39212 of 2008 ARJUN RISHI S/O LATE SATTAN RISHI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE/MOHALLA- KHUSKIBAGH OLD STORAGE, P.S. SADAR, DISTRICT- PURNEA- ------ PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR---- OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 2 16.10.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Petitioner’s bail was cancelled and he was taken into custody on 19.2.2008 because he is misusing the privilege of bail for more than 11 years. Non-cooperation of the petitioner in the matter which relates to the year, 1995 has unnecessarily allowed the case to remain pending for years together. This is a good ground why the Court should not interfere in the matter and allow any further indulgence to the petitioner, but keeping in mind annexure-2 which has been brought on record which is a so called compromise petition filed by the informant where he would not like to pursue the matter any further and also the fact that the offence is supposed to be under sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnia in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 155 of 1995 with a direction that the petitioner shall now either endeavor to get the matter closed based on the compromise petition or if the trial is - 2 - held shall now appear and cooperate in the same without any further breach in the matter. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)