1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 905 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3141 OF 2004 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. APRIL 05, 2007. Heard Shri Deshpande, learned counsel for the applicants, Shri Khubalkar, learned counsel for respondent No.1 and Shri Thakare, learned AGP for respondent No.2. The view taken by the Court during hearing was only to find out whether the matter could be amicably settled between Respondent No.1 and petitioner at that time. Unfortunately, that could not be done and after having order in his favour, at this stage Respondent No.1 is not ready and willing to give any consent to the arrangement then proposed. In the circumstances, the order passed cannot be reviewed. However, the Competent Authority i.e. Respondent No.2 or 2 any officers subordinate to him can consider the claim for allotment of land admeasuring 15' x 10' as made by the petitioner in Civil Application No.905 of 2007 before this Court independently on its own merit uninfluenced by observations made by me while deciding the petition on 6.2.2007, if any such application for allotment is moved by the petitioners. Civil Application for review is accordingly dismissed. No costs. JUDGE *GS.