^.r'" .fsf HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR e«S PETITIONER RESPONDENT W.P.(C)No. 1782 of 2010 Raghuvir Singh S/o Late Rajendra Singh, aged about 35 years, R/o Devendra Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) Versus Regional Transport Authority, Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.) (Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India) ADpearance: , Mr. Santosh Gupta, Counsel for the petitioner. Mrs. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the respondent. ORAL ORDER (21.04.2010) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard finally with the consent of the parties. Petitioner- Raghuvir Singh has filed this petition for issuance of necessary direction to the Regional Transport Authority, Raipur to consider and decide his application dated 03.12.2005 for renewal ofthe regular permit No. 33/95 on the route Durg to Raipur and back 2 return trips daily in accordance with the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act. According to the petitioner, the application for renewal of permit has been filed and no decision has been taken till date. Mrs. Smita Ghai, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent submits that if the application has been filed by the petitioner for renewal of regular permit and the same has not been disposed of till date, the Regional Transport Authority shall dispose of the same at the earliest in accordance with law. In view of the above submissions made by learned.Panel Lawyer for the respondent, this petition is disposed of with a direction that if the concerned Regional Transport Authority has not decided the application ,:fv.-:.^^ '"''''"'Vi % "%%, g ~y s W.P.CONo. 1782 of 2010 dated 03.12.2005 filed by the petitioner for renewal of regular permit for the above route till date, the same shall be disposed of in accordance with law, as early as possible, preferably within a period of 10 weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order by the petitioner before the said authority. With the aforesaid direction/observation, this petition stands disposed of. — Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge