IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 1514 of 2011 Date of decision: 13.5.2011 Budh Singh and others … Petitioners versus Balbir Singh and others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Ms. Harmanpreet Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioners Mr. Ashok Singla and Mr. Ravi Bansal, Advocates, for respondents No. 1 to 3 ... ARVIND KUMAR, J: The present petitioners are the plaintiffs in the suit for declaration titled Budh Singh and others v. Balbir Singh and others. They are aggrieved with order dated 4.2.2011 passed by the Civil Judge(Junior Division), Ellenabad,by dint of which their application for summoning Darshan Singh in rebuttal evidence has been dismissed. Heard. The name of Darshan Singh was duly mentioned in the list of witnesses but despite availing number of opportunities, the plaintiffs have not examined him while leading their evidence in the affirmative. He is stated to be a witness to the family settlement. The family settlement was never produced by the plaintiffs. However, their request to produce family settlement in secondary evidence had already been declined, which was upheld upto the Hon'ble Supreme Court. In this back-drop of the facts, the application of the plaintiffs for the examination of Darshan Singh in rebuttal evidence has rightly been dismissed by the Court below. No interference is called for. The revision petition stands dismissed. May 13, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) JS JUDGE