1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2820/2010 Ravishankar s/o Bhagwat Kaushal and others ...Versus... Nagpur Improvement Trust through its Chairman, Station Road, Sadar, Nagpur and others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. [Shri A. Parchure, Adv. for petitioners] [Shri R. Chhabra, Adv. for respdt. No.1] [Shri K.L. Dharmadhikari, AGP for respdt. Nos.2 & 4] CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & A.B. CHAUDHARI,JJ. DATED : 15.07.2011. Advocate Shri Chhabra for the respondent No.1 has presented the pursis dated 15.7.2011 in the Court today. The same is accepted on record. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. It appears on hearing the learned Counsel for the parties that though the land of the petitioners was acquired by the respondent No.1, the possession of the said land was not handed over to the respondent No.1 and hence, the respondent No.1 failed to allot plot No.75-B on Central Road, Section – II B to the petitioners. 2 In view of the statement made on behalf of the parties, it appears that the petitioners have handed over the possession of the land to the respondent No.1 on 23.5.2011 and it is stated by the respondent No.1 in the pursis dated 15.7.2011 that a proposal of allotment of plot No.75-B on Central Road, Section – II B will be made to the petitioners and the ascertained legal heirs. Advocate Shri Chhabra for the respondent No.1 states that the respondent No.1 is ready to allot plot No.75-B on Central Road, Section - II B to the petitioners and the petitioners are ready and willing to accept the allotment of plot No.75-B on Central Road Section – II B in their favour. The learned Counsel for the respondent No.1 states that if that be so, the possession of plot No.75-B on Central Road, Section II-B would be handed over to the petitioners as soon as they complete the necessary formalities. In view of the aforestated position, the grievance of the petitioners stand redressed. Writ Petition is, therefore, disposed of in the aforesaid terms with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE ssw