Kf ENBIP RPRW C^iQ^_ (2) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR s-fr^t WRIT PETITION (S) N0. " " /2006 PETITIONER ^'•?•<•''.'<'-:•• -t'./" '...ri-;i^L/-- ^^ oy-"' ^y ..~y' .^- SharadTiwari S/oShriL.L.Tiwari \ge about 42 years, Head Master, •Govt. Middle School, Anjora, R/o - Zone -2, Street - 6, New Aadarsh Nagar Distt. - Durg (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh ^ Through: Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer ^' Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION O^INDIA RESPONDENTS ^' -<&^ v\y .^•' @ HI6H COURT OF CWIATT[56ARH AT BILA5PUR W. P. fS) ^k>. 5635 of 2006 Petitioner : Ate9hancrth Yodw Versus Respondents : Starte 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh A arwther W. P.fSlNo. 5636 of 2006 Petitioner : Styadhar Proand Sohu Versus Respondents : State 6ovt. of CIAattisgarh A ano'ther W.P.faNo.S637of2006 Petitioner : Ramaahanhar 6uptn Versus Respondents : State6<>vt.ofChhattiagarhA<ino1her W. P.faNo. 5638 of 2006 Petitionw ; Taekam Lal Sinha Versus fteapondents : StateSovt.ofChhtrttiagarhAawthcr W. P. fSa No. 5639 of 2006 Petitioner : Smt. Sunita Pnl Versus Ruipondents : StBrteSwt.ofChhattisgarhAarwrtter W. P.faNo. 5640 of 2006 Petitioner : AAnhboob Khan Qunrishi Weraus : Shrtie6ovt.ofCWiattiagarhA<no1her W. P. fa No. 8641 of 2006 : Smt. Jagesinri Bhagel Respondents MHioner : Vwaus Reapondents : Shrtcfiovt.ofChhcttisgarhAawthw W. P.fSiNo. 5642 of 2006 Petitioner : Tulendra Kunur Tiwuri Veraus (teapondents : StuteSovt.ofChhattiagarhAano'ttier W.P.fStNo. 5643 <rf 2006 Petitioner : Ranwvtnr yadawn Veraus Reapondents : Statc 6ovt. of Chhattiagoi-hAawthcF Rrtitwner Reapondents Retitioner Reapondcnts Pktitioner Reapondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondarts Ptetitioner Reapo»Nicnts Petitioner Respondcnts Petitioner Reapondents Petitioner Respondents W. P. fSl No. S644 <rf 2006 : AnujRamSnhu Verau : Stute6ovt.ofChhattisgurhAano'rtier W. P.fSiNo. 5646 of 2006 : Raijendru IGumor Supla Vcrsus : Sftriiefiovt.ofChhattiagorhAano'ther W. P.fSlNo. 5647 of 2006 : 5haradTw»ari Versus : StatBfiovt.ofChhattisgnThAano'rtier W. P. fS) NO.S648 of 2006 : MohaidruPrcaadShukkt Versus : StiBtefiwt.ofChhatMtgarhdamrthu- W. P.fSlNo. 5673 of 2006 : fiunbhooahan Snhu WerajB ; StuteSovt.ofChhattiagorhAanolhT W.P.rSlNo.S674of2006 : Snt. Jayu TiNNri Vwaus ; Sln't«6ovt.ofChha*tiagnrhAflnothcr W.P.raNo.56TOof2006 : Tuka Ram awndRdtnr Versus Stete fiuvt. of Chhattiagarh Aano'ther W. P.fSNo. 5676 of 2006 : Riimesh Kunar Verma Veraus : Statefiovt.ofChhattisgorhAano'ther And W. P.fSlNB. 5677 of 2006 Versus llhanany Partel Statr Sovt.uf CWKtttiagnrh Aanolfaer Singte Bmich: Honlate Mr. Justicc Sattak K. ^ilhnrtri. Shri Ajoy Shrivastam, Advocote for Ihe Ptetitioners. Smt. Aiju Ahuja, by. 6ovt. Adwcate fcr Ihe reapondents/Statc. OROER (26th October. 2006) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for -the petitioners submits Ihut while Nwrking as Asauitant TeachwsAJpper Owiaien Teachers/Leehirers, 'the petitioners haw 9one on *riuinin9 to improve their qualifications <m thcir oi»nu^wwes and acquired B. Ed7B.TJ Ewmination Certificate. TTie present writ pctitions. bcing WP^S) Nas. S635/2006, 5636/2006,5637/2006. 5638/2006.8639/2006. 8640/2006. 5641/2006, 5642/2006. 5643/2006, 5644/2006, 5646/2006. 5647/2006. 5648/2006. 5673/2006,8674/2006. 5675/2006, 5676/2006 cnd 5677/2006 invalve ainular focts and common question of hw. Thus, 'these petitions are b»n9disposed of by Ihis common order. According to leamed cuunsel for •the petitionurs, the petitionws ere entitted to •hiw adwncB inGrements in vier ef •the decinon of Ihis Court' in -the caae of Yaahtiunt ICunwr Hianidway Vs. Municipcd Corporution, Dur9 ond awlher (2006 (W MPJR-CS 96}. Tliis Court in Ihe caue of VaahNunt l&nnar Bharodtiay Vs. Municipal Corpurution, Durg and ano-rtw 4 (Supra), came to Ihe conclusion Ihttt Ihe teuchws, who had obtnined B.Ed./B.TJ. Exammation Certificate on his own expenses, are cowred by the circukw duted 24.12^8 isaued by •the Starte SOTiemment of Atadhya Ppaduh. 4. Leumed counsel for Ihe petitionera firlhcr aAndts •that Ihe facts and question of law inwlved in 1h«prasent caaHS are squcrdy cowred by decision of Ihis Coirt in Ihe cnae of Yaahtiont Kuninr Bhandwuy Vs. Afcinicipal Corponrtion, Dur9 and ano-lher (Supra), to whidi leanwd COUMBI appcaring fur •Ihe reapondents fnirly concettes and agevss «wththe aawrmcnt made by leamed counael o()pearin9 for Ihe pcMtioners. 5. Accordingly, •the writ pctrMons are allewed in tenns of Ihe order passed in •the cnse of yaah-ont Kuninr BhcradwBy Vs. <AunicJpal Corponrtion, tiur9 and ano'ther (5upn0, aAject ta verification of Ihe fnct as to Nhelher 1h« petrMoners have acquh-ed B. Ed7B.TJ. Examinatwn Curtifica*e on •their own expenscs or not. No order as to costs. 6. A copy of •this ordw be ploud on record of alher connBChtd writ petitwns. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Babhi