IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE 13TH OCTOBER 2009 / 21ST ASWINA 1931 LA.App..No. 2020 of 2008(D) --------------------------- LAR.105/2001 of SUB COURT, MAVELIKKARA .................... APPELLANT(S)/ADDL.2ND RESPONDENT: -------------- INLAND WATERWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA PARAMARA SHOPPING COMPLEX, PARAMARA ROAD, KOCHI-682018, REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR (NOW OFFICE AT HOUSE NO.1/ 631/A.KANADIKADU AREA, MARADU PO., KOCHI-682 304. BY ADV. SRI.V.SANTHARAM, SC, IWAI RESPONDENT(S)/CLAIMANTS AND FIRST RESPONDENT: --------------- 1. CHANDRIKA, AGED 59, W/O.SIVADASAN, KOYIPPURATHU HOUSE, MAHADEVIKADU, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK, MAVELIKARA. 2. CHIPPY, AGED 30, D/O.SIVADASAN, KOYIPPURATHU HOUSE,MAHADEVIKADU, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK, MAVELIKARA. 3. LAKSHMI, AGED 29, D/O.SIVADASAN, KOYIPPURATHU HOUSE, MAHADEVIKADU, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK, MAVELIKARA. 4. SARASWATHY, AGED 29, D/O.SIVADASAN, KAYIPPURATHU HOUSE, MAHADEVIKADU, DO.DO. 5. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SPL.TAHSILDAR (LA), NATIONALWATERWAY NO.III, ALAPPUZHA. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.BASANT BALAJI THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------ C.M.Appln. No.2053/2008 & L.A.A.No. 2020 OF 2008 ------------------------ Dated this the 13th day of October, 2009 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. It is submitted on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant does not propose to rectify the defects. The delay petition is dismissed and the appeal is rejected. Refund one half of the court fee to the learned counsel for the appellant. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE dpk The judgment in C.M.Application No.2053/2008 & L.A.A. No.2020/2008 dated 13.10.2009 is modified and substituted as follows, vide order dated 10/2/2012 in I.A. No.4144/11 in L.A.A. No.2020/08: “ It is submitted on behalf of the appellant that in view of the decision taken by the Court in connected matters no useful purpose will be served from the appellants point of view for entertaining this appeal any longer. C.M.Application No.2053/08 and the appeal are dismissed. No costs.” SD/- Registrar(Judicial).