IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 15728 of 2011 Date of Decision: 26.08.2011 Jagir Kaur ..Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: Mr. R.S.Dhiman, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly argued that appellate authority,i.e., respondent No.1 be directed to decide the appeal filed by the petitioner against the suspension order and meanwhile status quo be maintained. He further states that in the appeal, respondent no. 1 has fixed September 12th, 2011. The only apprehension of the learned counsel is that respondent No.1 may not decide the appeal on the date fixed and the appeal shall be adjourned for a longer period. Without expressing any opinion on the merit and maintainability of the appeal, respondent No. 1 is directed to decide the appeal on 12.09.2011, the date fixed or in any case within 30 days thereafter on its own merit, in accordance with law and meanwhile, status quo as on day. Petition stands disposed of. (ALOK SINGH) JUDGE 26.08.2011 som