••^' 4-^7-^Q INTHEHIGHCOURTSFJUDICATUREATBILASPURCHMAI'1'ISGARH PETItlONER .^^y ^^ e \'..;lt" . .•••pffi^^..' ^''y'r)f>' 1\;- '^y RESPONDENTS: WritRetition(S)No;.^fe/2&10''(SB)liSiNGl.£BE Sankalp Randey, Aged about 22 i years, S/o Late Shri Sanfosh Prasad . Randgy, F'osted asShiksliia Karmi ©rade ]]], GQvernrnent Primary School, Lalkhadan, Districf. — • Bilaspur (Chtiattisgarh), Resident ^of HDusing Board Colony, Dewarikhurd; District - Bilaspur ^( hattisgarh)... . .. ^ VERSUS 1' •State©K6hhaftisgarh,^ . Through:PrineipalSecretary, School EducatiQn Department, Mantralay, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhaffisgarh) 2. The.Collector, BilaspurDistricf-Bilaspur ^Chhattisgarh) ^^.^^ 3.' The Districf Education Qfficer, Bifaspur (Chhattisgarh) •^ 4. ^The Janpad Panchayat Bilha, '{'hrQugh:CI-iiefExeGutiveOffiGer; Bistrict-Bi)aspur(Chhattisgarh) WRITPETITIONUNDERARTICL&22^QFTHECONSTITUTIONOFINDIA s^ 1 PARTICULARSOFTHEPETITIONERS Asmehtionedaboveinthecausetitle. , 2. PARTICULARSOFTHERESPON&ENTS As stated in the above causetitle. 3. PARTICULARSOFTHEORDE^GAINSTWHieHTNEPETITION -HG—78 OT^I V h-U* w sn^i *»)!<* *11*1CTI th*licb '3'sr "41'41d'4, yfllyis, fs|<niylj,< -_;.M,^.liA-p..,-5.3-3>6.1l^_ +'W^ 200 sn^i 'T??? ('i'iE^'i1!) TOiiWdfe( sirt?r SB: Hon'bie ShriManindraMot 23-07-2010 Shri Sandeep Dubey, coun| Ms. Smita Ghai, Panei Lav|fye 3 on advance copy. Learned counsei for the compassionate appointment date^ when the petitioner was given be appointed on any post of ci| Learned counsel for the petitionet appointment on the post of compassionate appointment vid| counsel for the petiUoner submits| not a reguiar post and the post is project of Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha n^ On the other hand, submi^s that a perusai of cireular dated 1Q the Dost of Shiteha Kai"mi is a po^ cortlpassionate There is no other material Karmi, Grade-iii is a temporary petitioner to approach responder notjce and raise such cialm for a] with the poiicy of cornpassionate stiraf^pft't 'WT^ff ^f 'fe^ <f^-^t< ^siRnan^i an Shrivastava, J. ^ei for the petitioner. w for the State/respondents No.1 , 2, and ftietitioner submits that in view of policy of 10/06/2003, which was in force at the tlme appointment, he was entitled to l^ss-3 or ciass-4 in regular establishment. t submits tfiat he was given compassionate Shiksha Karmi, Grade-iil by way of i|e order dated Annexure P/5. Leamed |that the post of Shiksha Karmi, Grade-iil is [ikely to be aboiished after completion of the pssion, a time bound project. ^sion of learned counsei for respondents is 1/06/2003 (^inexure P/1) clearly shows at )t borne in the reguiar establishment. |on record to show that the post of Shiteha ipost. However, it wouid be open for the Its No.2, 3 and 4 to bring this fact to their frpointment Qn a reguiar post in accordance |appointment. in case, such representation agpnf BAClSBAUqS UEqOIV BJpUIUBM /-PS •yo pesodsip Aiieuy si uoiised 941 'suo[}BAjesqo piesejo^e sifl 411^ •MB| l|tlM SOUBpJOaOB Ul UOj}B}U8S8jd8J uons uo Ajsnojiipedxa uoisraep Sije} t|Bi-!s|A}jJ04}ne psujsauoo eifl 'epBLU si lis^ite biyte j^ >l?>ltJ> p.aj jl jUhlh l.(bU]bllti --&•- i»^i»iia]»tteiwa ItilkUS l^lto IfctU ifcll.b] lifc ft^lK> (tit>f»Pjl»?i)Afeti U^Ite OOZ ^.rt i . t(sltt«S IWhlh ^~i]'ef'<g^'{:":^"C^W^~" >TiMK>sJ '°>!»»• [ftffi 'h.Plh.lh- |n.p 8/.—3H3*Eslk /r.^-v /y ^ y