IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 8TH OCTOBER 2009 / 16TH ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 28283 of 2009(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SAIDHU MUHAMMED.A., S/O.ABDUL RAHIMAN, AGED 32 YEARS, URUKANNIPARAMBU HOUSE, NADUVATHAPARA P.O., PERINGOTUKURUSSY VIA, PALAKKAD DT. (RC OWNER AND POSSESSOR OF KL-9-P/6451). BY ADV. SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, THRISSUR. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PAZHAYANNOOR POLICE STATION, PAZHAYANNOOR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY SR.GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No.28283 of 2009-E = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 8th day of October, 2009. JUDGMENT The petitioner is aggrieved by the conditions imposed by the first respondent District Collector while ordering temporary release of a vehicle involved in a matter relating to certain allegations of removal of river sand. The vehicle is prevented from entering the Thrissur district and is also required to be produced once in a week before the competent authority. Certain amounts have also been fixed for deposit. It is stated that such amounts have been deposited. While the petitioner seeks variation of the conditions imposed as per the impugned order, the last sentence in that order records that the matter has to be finally heard. Though the date fixed therein for the issuance of the final order is over, it is stated by the learned counsel for WPC28283/09 -: 2 :- the petitioner that his client is yet to get any communication of such decision. Ends of justice would be satisfied, if the District Collector issues the final decision at the earliest, at any rate, within two weeks from now. It is so ordered without interfering with the conditions imposed as per the impugned order. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/131009