IN TH E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-24901-2011 Date of decision:03.10.2011 Amarjeet Singh @ Jeeta ...Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Gautam Dutt, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. J.S.Brar, AAG, Punjab. ***** Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (Oral) This is a petition for grant of regular bail in a pending trial case registered vide FIR No.229 dated 21.09.2010, under Sections 307, 427, 148, 149, 120-B, 34 of IPC and 25/27/54/59 of the Arms Act at Police Station Sarabha Nagar, District Ludhiana. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody from 13.12.2010 and is not named in the FIR. However, he has been named by an eye-witness in his statement under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, but still the petitioner is not alleged to have caused any injury except that the gun shot which he had fired had caused damage to the car. He has also submitted that the petitioner is neither a previous convict nor any other case is pending against him and there are 21 witnesses in all but no-one has been examined so far. Learned State Counsel concedes the aforesaid fact and admits that no injury was caused by the petitioner to any person. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, but without making any observation on the merits, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. October 03, 2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) vinod* Judge