IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.8742 of 2011 Date of Decision : May 17, 2011. Kulwant Singh and another .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.S.K.Sandhir, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Petitioner No.1 is working as a Junior Engineer while petitioner No.2 is a retired Panchayat Secretary from the Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Punjab. Their grievance is that no final decision is being taken pursuant to the Enquiry Report dated 16.8.2007 (Annexure P-7) despite a representation dated 8.1.2008 (Annexure P-10) submitted by them followed by a reminder dated 10.11.2010 (Annexure P11). Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and without expressing any views on the merits of their claim, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent No.2 to take an CWP No.8742 of 2011 [2] appropriate decision on the representation/reminder said to have been made by the petitioners, in accordance with law/Rules, preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. May 17, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE