: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.534 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.534 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.534 OF 2007 1. Mr.Vimalchand C. Gothi 2.Mrs.Sushila Vimalchand Gothi ...Applicants. V/s. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. Shri Ramrao Adik, Sr.Counsel with Shri Ashish Gaikwad, advocate i/b Peter Lobo for the Applicants. Mrs.M.H.Mhatre, APP for the Respondent/State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 5th March, 2007. DATE : 5th March, 2007. DATE : 5th March, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Mr.Adik, the learned senior counsel for the applicants and Mrs.Mhatre, the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicants seek anticipatory bail in Crime No.4 of 2007 registered with Samata Nagar Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 406 read with Section 34 of the I.P.C. on a report lodged by Mamta wife of Rajesh. 3. Mamta was married to Rajesh, who is son of the present applicants. It was a love marriage. However, it appears that the relations got strained and on 3rd January, 2007 she had lodged the F.I.R. on the basis of : 2 : which crime No.4 of 2007 is registered against Rajesh as well as the present applicants. After carefully going through the record, I find that the main allegations are against Rajesh. Rajesh is granted anticipatory bail today only in criminal application 533 of 2007. In view of this, I see no justification to refuse anticipatory bail to the present applicants, who are old persons aged about 65 and 56 years. For the aforesaid reasons, in the event of arrest in Crime No.4 of 2007, the applicants Mr.Vimalchand C. Gothi and Mrs.Sushila Vimalchand Gothi be released on their executing P.R.Bond of Rs.15,000/- each with surety of like amount with condition that they shall fully co-operate with the police in investigation and shall make themselves available to the police as and when required for the interrogation during day time. 4. Application stands disposed off. (J.H.Bhatia,J.) (J.H.Bhatia,J.) (J.H.Bhatia,J.)