IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10684 of 2008 DHUMAN RAI With Cr.Misc.No.12852 of 2008 Babu Lal Ram @ Bhola Ram @ Krit Narayan Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 8.5.2008 In both these applications, Prayer of the petitioners is for grant of bail in Chiraiya Town P.S.Case No.89 of 2006 registered under section 395 of the Indian Penal code. Mr. Sunil Kumar No.III appears on behalf of the petitioners in Cr.Misc.No.19684 of 2008, whereas petitioner of Cr.Misc.No.12812 of 2008 is represented by Mr.Shakti Suman Kumar. They contend that neither the petitioners have been named in the first information report nor they were put in the identification parade. Mr. Atul Chandra, Additional public Prosecutor appears for the State. True it is that the petitioners have not been named in the first information report, but their complicity in the crime had surfaced during the course of investigation. In view of the nature of allegation and material available, I am not inclined to accede to the prayer of the petitioners. However, in case the trial is not concluded within nine months, petitioners shall be at liberty to renew their prayer for bail before the Court below 2 itself, which shall consider the same in accordance with law. Applications stand dismissed with the aforesaid observation. (C.K.Prasad, ACJ) ahk