IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 7TH APRIL 2009 / 17TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 9950 of 2009(K) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- V.PRABHAKARAN,S/O.KUNHIKRISHNAN, RAGHU NIVAS,P.O.KAVUMBHAGOM, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SECRETARY,REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR. 2. THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER,ELECTION (GENERAL DEPARTMENT),LEGISLATURE COMPLEX,VIKAS BHAVAN.PO,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695033. ADV. SRI.MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, SC,ELE.COMMN. FOR R2 MR.M.A.ASIF, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.9950 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 7th day of April, 2009 J U D G M E N T Grievance is regarding the refusal on the part of the respondents to issue the granted permit to the petitioner on the ground that the Chief Electoral Officer has issued Ext.P2 order directing that such issue be deferred till the process of election is over. 2. The learned standing counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent submits that if a proposal seeking sanction for the issue of permit is received from the 1st respondent, the same shall be considered and orders thereon shall be passed within two days of its receipt. 3. In my view, this undertaking given will substantially redress the grievance of the petitioner, and therefore, leaving it open to the 1st respondent to seek sanction of the 2nd respondent as submitted by them, this writ petition is closed. 4. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg