IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 23933 of 2008 Between: Syed Aleemuddin S/o.Late Syed Afzal R/o. H.No.24/2/64, Rickshaw colony, District Adilabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Adilabad. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer / Tahsildar, Adilabad District. 3 The Commissioner, Town Municipality, Adilabad. 4 Syed khaleemuddin S/o. Syed Aleemuddin R/o. H.No.8-1-523/302/1, Shakerpet Munibrindavan Colony, Hyderabad. 5 Safiasultana W/o.Late Syed Saleemuddin R/o. Dood Bowli Area, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to pass an order or orders, direction or directions, or issue a writ more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent No.1 & 2 herein to issue patta certiﬁcate, by regularizing my encroachment of house site, bearing H.No.4-9-549 (old) correspondent to 4-4-24/2/64 (new) Rickshaw Colony, Adilabad, as per the policy of the State Govt. and according to the proceedings issued by the respondent No.2 vide No.C/1246/97, dated 24.03.2003 and consequently declare the inaction of the respondent No. 1 & 2 in not issuing the patta certiﬁcate in time is illegal, arbitrary, violative of Article 14 & 21 of the Constitution of India and against the policy of the State Government. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.S.CHANDRASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.23933 of 2008 Order: This writ petition is ﬁled seeking a Mandamus directing respondents 1 and 2 to issue patta in favour of the petitioner by regularizing house site bearing H.No.4-9-549 (old) corresponding to 4-4-24/2/64 (new) Rickshaw Colony, Adilabad, as per the policy of the State Government and proceedings issued by the second respondent, dated 24.03.2003. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents 1 and 2. A reading of the averments made in the aﬃdavit ﬁled in support of the writ petition, disclose that there are disputes between him and respondents 4 and 5, and as there is intervention by respondent Nos. 4 & 5, the petitioner is seeking directions to respondents 1 and 2 for conducting enquiry and issue patta in his favour. According to the petitioner’s own admission, by memo, dated 26.09.2008, the second respondent, the Tahsildar, Adilabad District, has already initiated proceedings and has directed the Revenue Inspector to inquire into the matter. In view of the same, no direction as sought for by the petitioner in this writ petition can be given to respondents 1 and 2, at this stage. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed, at the admission stage. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 04.11.2008 VGB