IN THE HON'BLB i7 PETITIONER: ^TVIaster Piyush Arjun S/o Shri N, Arjunan aged about 12 years througjn his^father Shri N. Arjunan aged aboiJff 5'7'8SF- years S/o Shri Narayanari, •ccupation- Contractor, R/o ., -OYI^<Xkashwani Colony Ambikapur, Post ^- and Tehsil Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.). REj VERSUS >ENT: ^ ^Jrt State of C.G. through Secretary, Local Self Governnient, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) | w -" ...-*" l>"%.a°^-r. /^-^"tft.,.--\F '\.^S^ ^ '•" V..K!&T ^<. .. ucipal Corporati through Coramissioner Municipal ^<\ CW ,a-s- WRIT PETITION OF INDIA FOR NATURE OF Corporation, Bilaspur C.G. r DIRECTION(S) i:" !• i' .^i:' t [— --;.^; iu&^^,a!ie^AK<s»saS3H!ff^»iStffiS!a»^^ f MlStLCOUfiTOEJUDICAIUREAT B_L£UMATTISGARU ^--^1""?;"^ ^3 '<fii"ia!;il-HC-22 -^' sntw-CT h-Uch 3JI§?[ ?FRNi"HftH ¥- 'S^f -^MM^, ^VW, WTO11 SlfflR) M...f>...0.^......^^^ aii^i ^giw tlfta SB : Hon'bie Shri manindra mohdIn Shrivastava. J. 18-02-2011 Dr. N.K.Shukia, Senior Advficate aiong with Shri Shaiiendra ShuMa, counsei for the Detitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dejtiuty Government Advocate for the State/respondent No.1. Shri B.P.Banjare, counsei foij his petition has been filed b^ the petitioner for issuance of appropriate l^nts from interfering v/ith the peacefui )^rty of the peiitioner and also to direct t>y acqulring petitioners iand. that the petitioner, who is the owner of the airection to resirain tne resoona possession or me 'ana ana propi responaents, not to construct arain ne case or tne petltioner is Pahvari Haika No.20, Sarkanda, registerea saie aeea (Annexure K/l snows tnat a arain is proposea to Deen aone inaicates tnat some port' De taKen Dy tne partles ror construi me lana owned bv tne Detitioner respondent/Corporation couid not inciuding portion of the land of the p So far no reDlv has been fih propose to construct anv drain, ^i^i^'f <-iH^T ^ fe^t <f^t^T< ^? aifiatT sn^i respondent No.2. iand in dispute, admeasuring 361 pSq. Ft. situated in Khasra No.748/05, yiiaspur, wnicn ne purcnased tnrougn ]). Accoraing to tne petitioner, e existing width of the road is 30 Feet from tlte centre of the road from both sides and there is already a pacca arain on tlhe side of the road. it has been stated in the petition that the respondent/Cotooration has initiated certain action which pe constructea ana marKings wnich nave |on of me land ot me petitioner woutd a!so ttion of drain. it is submitted that uniess, Es acquired in accordance Vi/ith !aw. the Ihave proceeded to construci drain/road fetitioner. $d by any of the respondents. However, counsel appearing for the resporjdent submits that in case. resDondent me same wouia De aone strictiv in [^^fe-q 'WS-''!SWs-S,SS,-s-.--': '~~~'":'-'^'^ '•', 8 £•s.sss^?::. fl '^K^^ti, 'a.'\ •?'-ny (C-22 ;';?' ^rs^ .-^ sn^i^ii h-w^i an^i ueepEE .'ie ^vf ^|<||c-|q, anld'IS, [aidl'M1),' WHii'ffgainqi ^.•P..-..feL)..^ • S^^/ a 7- ^•^pC '200' SU^T ?^1WBfttI -3 ndtice nbt accordance with iaw and proper that tili date, the Corporation has in view of what has been No.2, no specific direction is requ| emphasize, if the Corporation lnteit< shali do so strictlv in accordance Act. in case, any aaverse actiop open for the peiitioner to take to nim unaer tne law. i ne Deftion will also tie issuea. Me rurtner suDmits n|3t issued any notice to the petitioner. Istated by learned counsei for respondent Ired to be issued at oresent. Neediess to |ds to carry on construction ofdrain/road, it vlfith the provislons of Municipal Corporation recourse cCT£(I(rf41Tl lfw^i ^ fe^ <f^Rril< ^T aipgii sn^r is taKen against me peirtioner, it will be to sucn remeay, as may De avaiiaDie s accordinglydisposed off. Sd/- M.M. Shrivastava Judge [Ti®tfeq r~... l^a^Sesa' ~S'i>.,,.a«aaa_^