IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.748 of 2008 ABDUL SATTAR @ MD.ABDUL SATTAR SON OF LATE SADIRUDDIN, R/O- BASAGAON, P.S.- AZAMNAGAR, DISTRICT- KATIHAR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. AFAQUE SON OF LATE ENAMUDDIN, 3. ANWAR SON OF LATE ENAMUDDIN 4. GHESRU SON OF LATE ENAMUDDIN 5. QUAMRUL SON OF LATE ENAMUDDIN 6. MANNAN SON OF LATE ENAMUDDIN 7. ATABUL RAHMAN S/O- LATE JAMALUDDIN 8. MOQUEEM @ MOQUEEMUDDIN, S/O- MOFIZUDDIN. 9. FAROOQUE SON OF ZAHIRUDDIN 10. SHAMIM SON OF FAROOQUE. 11. SHARIF SON OF DARUL ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE- BASAGAON, P.S.- AZAMANAGAR, DISTRICT- KATIHAR. ----------- 4 27.09.2010 Petitioner(informant) is aggrieved by the judgment and order of acquittal dated 7.5.2008 passed in Sessions Trial No. 395 of 2005 by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-IV, Katihar whereby the accuseds have been tried and acquitted of diverse charges including one framed under Section 307 IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner draws attention of this Court to paragraph 9 of the judgment wherefrom it appears that P.Ws 6, 7, 9 and 10 did not support the prosecution case and as such they were declared hostile. The evidence of P.W. 1, 2, 4 and 5 (informant) have been appraised in paragraph nos. 11, 12, 13 and 14 respectively. On a consideration of the materials on record, learned trial court recorded its finding in paragraph 15 of the judgment. I have perused those paragraphs. A view has been taken based on the materials on record by the learned trial court 2 which, in the facts and circumstances of the case, cannot be said to be patently illegal and/or perverse. There is no merit in this application. It is accordingly dismissed. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )