3 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3608 OF 2011 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 363 OF 1992 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 15/04/2011 PER COURT : 1. This is an application filed by the applicants seeking themselves to be brought on record as the legal representatives of deceased respondent no. 1. Mr. H.K.Mundhe, the learned counsel states that the applicants were not having knowledge of the pendency of the present Second Appeal and there was no disturbance in the possession of the applicants. The applicants got the knowledge of the pendency of the present proceedings when the application was filed by the respondents before the Revenue Officer on 21/2/2011. According to the learned counsel, the present respondents themselves have shown the present applicants as legal representatives of the deceased Gulam 3 Murtuza, who was the original defendant no. 1. 2. Mr. A.N. Kanade, the learned counsel for the appellant nos. 1 to 3 in the Second Appeal states that there is an inordinate delay in filing the application. In fact, they were already given other property and they are not concerned with the present property. 3. It is not disputed by Mr. P.R.Katneshwarkar, the learned counsel that the present applicants were shown as legal representatives of deceased defendant no. 1. There is nothing on record to show that the present applicants have the knowledge of the present litigation prior to 21/2/2011. 4. In light of the same, the present applicants are allowed to be brought on record as legal representatives of deceased respondent no. 1 along with the representatives which are already brought on record. The Civil Application is accordingly disposed of. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J. ] KNP/CA 3608.2011 in SA 363.1992 3