[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.REVN.NO.114 OF 2007 IN MISC.APPLICATION NO.26 OF 2006 IN SESSIONS CASE NO.887 OF 2004 Rupesh Sakharam Gaikwad and Anr. ..Applicants Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... Mr.Neville D.Deboo i/b A.B.Bhoir advocate for applicant Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : APRIL 13, 2007 DATE : APRIL 13, 2007 DATE : APRIL 13, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant has prayed for recalling of witness nos.1 to 3 in Sessions Case No. 887 of 2004 which is pending before the learned Addl. Sessions Court at Kurla, Mumbai. 3. The learned A.P.P. on instructions, states [-2-] that on costs being deposited by the applicant, the prayer of the applicant for recalling of the witnesses may be allowed. 4. In view of the statement, application for recalling witnesses i.e. P.W.Nos.1 to 3 is allowed on the applicant depositing Rs.1200/- before the Sessions Court. Out of the said amount of Rs.1200/-, bhatta charges be paid to P.W.Nos.1 to 3 as deemed appropriate by the trial Court and the remaining amount to go to the State. 5. Application is disposed of. [Smt. V.K.Tahilramani, J.]