IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35803 of 2010 NAIYAR IMAM @ MUMTAZ @ NETA . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . with Cr.Misc. No.32459 of 2010 SANJAY THAKUR @ DAVI LAL . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . with Cr.Misc. No.42538 of 2010 MD. GULAM RASOOL . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . with Cr.Misc. No.45169 of 2010 RAM BARAN DAS . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 03/- 08-03-2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. All these four bail applications arising out of same police station case i.e. Benipatti P.S. Case No. 79 of 2010 are heard together and being disposed of by this common order. In this case instituted against unknown relating to taking of one tractor with trailer from the informant and son of the owner (the deceased) by consuming some eatable during transit causing them senseless by three non petitioners intercepting them and have also been identified during T.I.P. Petitioners name emerged during investigation and except petitioner Md. Gulam Rasool other three petitioners have confessed their involvement before the police. The role of the petitioners in the entire episode as appears from their said 2 confessional statement and other material submitted by learned Additional Public Prosecutor are to manage entire affairs behind the screen and disposing of the stolen tractor and trailer. Petitioner, namely, Naiyar Imam @ Mumtaz @ Neta is said to have approached another petitioner, namely, Sanjay Thakur @ Davi Lal in disposing of the property whereas petitioner, namely, Ram Baran Das remained only in association of others. There appears nothing more specific. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let all the four petitioners, namely, Naiyar Imam @ Mumtaz @ Neta, Sanjay Thakur @ Davi Lal, Md. Gulam Rasool and Ram Baran Das are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Benipatti P.S. Case No. 79 of 2010. One of the bailor must be a government servant. Subject to condition to attend the court regularly at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, and in the event of failure on three consecutive dates, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)