IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P. (2271 No. 3@i% / 2011 R/o Naya Ganj Ward, Bhatapara, Aarakshi Kendra Bhatapara (City), Distt.— Raipur (C.G.). ' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PETITIONER / Dr. Kamlesh Vishvas (RESPONDENT/ S/o Shri Manohar ACCUSED} Vishvas, aged about 41 years, R/ o village Marada, Police Station— Kasdol, Tahsil— Baloda Bazar, Distt.~ Raipur (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENT : / SanjayMakkad S/o Shri [APPELLANT] Jogendar Lal Makkad, COMPLAINANT} aged about 40 years, Gf\ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIsGARH AT BILASPIB' Writ Petition {227) No. 307 of201 l PETITIONE : Dr. Kamlesh Vishvas Versus RESPONDENT : Sanjay Makkad m PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OFVTI-E CONSTITUI'ION OF INDIA 133: Hon'ble Mr. N.K. Aggwal, .1! Piesent : Shri Samir Singh, Advocate for the petition . ORAL ORDER (Passed on 20.01.201 l) R l. The instant petition is direct i against the order dated 06.122010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhatapara, Raipur, in Cn'minal Appeal No. 34/2010, ‘whoreby delay of days in 01mg the appeal by the raspondent was condoned. 2. Shn' Samir Singh, learned counsel W appearing for the petitioner would cOntend that without there being any sumcient cause delay has been wrongly condoned by the court 3. below. Having heard the counsel for appearing the petitioner and having perused the order impugned, I do not find any substance in the petition. The cause assigned by the by respondent was that earlier g he was under impression that revision has WW h to be died, but in view of subsequent amendment appeal {I was maintainable and in this way delay of The cause assigned by the respondent was su$cient to qondpne delay of six days in ming the appeal and the m'a] court has rightly condoned the same. In View of above, the petition beingdevoid of substance is liable to be and is hereby dismissed in limine. Sd/— N.K. Agrawal Judge