IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-20854 of 2009 Date of decision : October 13, 2009 Vikram alias Balli ....Petitioner versus State of Haryana ....Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal Present : Mr. Jitender Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Sidharth Sarup, AAG Haryana L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral) Vikram alias Balli has filed this petition for bail in case FIR No. 371 dated 29.3.2009 under sections 307, 120-B read with section 34 IPC and section 25 of Arms Act, Police Station City Hissar. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file. According to the prosecution version, the petitioner fired a shot hitting Surinder alias Sunder on thigh. Thereafter petitioner's co-accused Ravinder alias Raja fired shot hitting head of Sunder. Thereafter both of them i.e. petitioner and Ravinder fired one or two more shots hitting Surinder alias Sunder. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the shot fired by the petitioner hit the injured on thigh causing only simple injury and the Criminal Misc. No. M-20854 of 2009 -2- petitioner is in custody since 2.4.2009. On the other hand, learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Suraj Mal, contended that there was entry wound on thigh. The margins were blackened revealing that shot was fired from close range. The injured suffered three entry wounds besides pallet injuries and it would show that atleast four shots were fired. Learned State counsel also pointed out that the petitioner is involved in four more cases including two cases under section 307 IPC. Keeping in view the aforesaid but without meaning to express any opinion on merits, in my opinion, the petitioner does not deserve the concession of bail. Dismissed. ( L.N. Mittal ) October 13, 2009 Judge 'dalbir'