PETITIONER: IN_THE_HIGH CQURT_OF_CH_HAmSGARH^T BLLASPUR WRIT.PETITKWNCL $.5:?^.QF 2006 Mela Ram Varma age 43 years S/o Shir Kirit Ram Vanna R/o.ViU- Kanki, Post Tilda Distt.Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary P.W.D Mantralaya D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur Superintendent Engineer, PWD Raipur Division, Civil Line, Raipur RESPONDENTS 2. ^yyr_'______Rf ^" x..--''' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 2267 227_QF_'mE ^. -.-„--——^^^ CONSTITUTION OP INDIA. XI-HC-22 3(^1 %I R-ii+sn^i rabHiti df?<r V.. Qowri Jf^ ^^ 3^^ITOWT, »T(lwiio,Rciwy qaib *ii*<ni a»*fi<»> 3TT^?T ..te.^ts)...^.,^^-^ ^' 'i-o&t. 2oa Ri<>4, 3(I^?TB?<ITW «f(a Shri Ashok Das Vaishne|\ petitioner. Shri V.V.S Murthy, Dy. 4 Dy. Govt. Advocate for the Stat^/ Heard. Learned counsel for th< representation is pending q< Engineer, PWD, Raipur Divisicjn present he does not want to pr( to respondent No.2 lo decide th; Learned counsei for th< prayer. Considered. Accordingly, the writ p' respondent No.2^Superintend^ Raipur, to decide the represenj pending with him, within a peri< of a copy of this order. With the aforesaid directi< Consequentiy, I.A.No.11 Certified copy as per rule^ =t>l<lf<-l<(l-l ><14ctl'S:tetA'<faw.l< ^wf^Tsn^r and Shri Sameer Sahu, counset for the dvocate General with Shri Satish Gupta, respondents No.1 and 2. petitioner submits that the petitioner's sfore .respondent No.2/Superintendent i, Raipur, for consideration, therefore, at iss this petition and prays for a dsrection said representation. State has not opposed the aforesaid :ition is dteposed of with a direction to nt Engineer, PWD, Raipur Division, tation of the petitioner dated 12-6-2006, ^d of three months from the date of fiiing ^n, the writ petition stends disposed of. 115/2006 also stands disposed of. Sd/- V.K. Shrivastava Judge (^y^)