IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-35536 of 2009 Date of decision : 13.1.2010 Mahabir and another … Petitioners Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr.Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Harinder S.Beniwal,DAG, Haryana. Sabina J. Reply by way of affidavit on behalf of respondent-State filed in Court, today is taken on record. The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal procedure for grant of bail in case FIR No.428 dated 29.11.2009, under Section 332, 353 and 186 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station, City Gohana, District Sonepat. The prosecution story is that when the complainant had gone to execute the warrants of arrest, he was threatened by the petitioners. Thereafter at 4:30 p.m. on 25.11.2009, the complainant was again attacked by the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the initially, at the time of registration of the FIR, the fact that the petitioners had attacked the complainant, was not mentioned. Rather it was only stated in the FIR that two unknown persons had attacked the complainant at 4:30 p.m. on 25.11.2009. Learned State counsel on the other hand has submitted that in a supplementary statement suffered by the complainant, he has stated that he had been slapped by the petitioners and had been abused by them. Crl.Misc.No.M-35536 of 2009 Keeping in view the fact that the petitioners had threatened the complainant at about 4:30 p.m. on 25.11.2009 and had also given beatings to the complainant as stated by the complainant in his supplementary statement, no ground for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is made out. The complainant-bailiff of the Court had gone to execute the warrants of arrest of Jaiveer and Krishan and he was not allowed to perform his duty. Rather, latter, he was attacked by the petitioners. Keeping in view the seriousness of the offence alleged to have been committed by the petitioners, this petition is dismissed. [ Sabina ] Judge 13.1.2010 sd 2