IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 7505 with CWP Nos. 7506, and 7627 of 2011. Date of Decision : September 13 , 2011 1. CWP No. 7505 of 2011 Ravindra Rani Versus State of H.P. & another 2. CWP No. 7506 of 2011 Chaman Singh Versus State of H.P. & another 3. CWP No. 7627 of 2011 Jeet Singh Versus State of H.P. & another. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner(s) :Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate in CWP NOs. 7505 and 7506 of 2011. Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate in CWP No. 7627 of 2011. For the respondents : Mr. R. K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J. K. Verma, Dy. A.G. for the respondents –State. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim the benefit of ad-hoc service followed by regular service for the purpose of pension and increments. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the judgments of this Court rendered in LPA No.36 of 2010, titled as Sita Ram vs. State of H.P. Therefore, the writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondent concerned to examine the matter in the light of the judgment referred to above and take 2 appropriate action within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment, along with their representation(s) and a copy of the writ petition(s) as well as a copy of the judgment referred to above, by the petitioner(s). 2. These writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. September 13, 2011 (PK/hl.)