IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR W.P.Nos. 33014 of 1997 & 14458 of 1999 WRIT PETITION NO : 33014 of 1997 Between: Smt. Gopu Annamma W/o Rayapu Reddy R/o Mattampally (V) & (M), Nalgonda Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Joint Collector & Addl. Dist. Magistrate, Nalgonda 2 M.R.O. Mattampally (V), Mandal, Nalgonda Dist. 3 Gade Sundaramma W/o late Balreddy Mattampally (V) & (M), Nalgonda Dist. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order direction or a writ particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus after calling for th records from the 1st respondent and set aside the order of the 1st respondent passed in Case No.C3/JC/ROR/14/96 dt: 13-10-97 Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.SRINIVASA MURTHY (None appeared) Counsel for the Respondents: GP for Revenue Mr. P. Venugopal Rao, And WRIT PETITION NO : 14458 of 1999 Between: Gopu Annamma w/o. Rayapa Reddy Mattampally V. & M., Nalgonda Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Mandal Revenue Officer Mattapally (M), Nalgonda Dist. 2 Revenue Divisional Officer Miryalaguda, Nalgonda Dist. 3 Joint Collector Nalgonda, Nalgonda Dist. 4 Gade Sundaramma w/o. Bal Reddy Mattapally VI. & Man., Nalgonda Dist. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ, order or directionmore particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents issuing certificate U/S. 13-B of ROR Act 1971 in favour of the 4th respondent herein by the Mandal Revnue Officer without following principles of Natural Justice, rules and regulations under revenue loss and such allotment of issuing certificates of pattas in favour of the 4th respondent is of malacious nature discriminating one another which is illegal arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents tocancel the certificates issued to the 4th respondent U/S. 13-B of ROR Act 1971 by allowing to the petitioners continue position of land bearing Nos. 144,82a and 86aa of Mattampally Vill., and Mandal, Nalgonda Dist., and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.KOONA REDDY ANJI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos. GP for Revenue Mr. P. Venugopal Rao, The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR W.P.Nos. 33014 of 1997 & 14458 of 1999 COMMON ORDER: None appeared for the petitioner in both the writ petitions either in the forenoon or in the afternoon today. On 2.12.2008 same situation was there and so also on 19.12.2008. Learned counsel for 3rd respondent is present and he states that though he has given a notice to counsel for the petitioner, no steps are taken with respect to 3rd respondent who has reportedly died. In the circumstances, therefore, it is apparent that the petitioners have no interest in pursuing these matters. The writ petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. _________________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J Dt.22.12.2008 KR ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 Joint Collector & Addl. Dist. Magistrate, Nalgonda 2 M.R.O. Mattampally (V), Mandal, Nalgonda Dist. 3. 2 CCs to GP for Revenue 4. 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{BMD}