IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 2907 of 2011 ` Date of decision: 3.5.2011 HUDA … Petitioner versus Viney Tayal and others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mr. A.K.Kansal, Advocate, for the petitioner ... ARVIND KUMAR, J: The present petitioner,HUDA, is the judgment-debtor and is aggrieved with order dated 28.3.2011 passed in the execution application giving directions to the petitioner-judgment-debtor to deposit the arrears of decretal amount in the sum of Rs.2,26,662.58P in the Court along with statutory interest upto 31.3.2011 on or before 3.5.2011 failing which the Administrator HUDA will appear in Court in person on 3.5.2011 to explain the source from where the decree is to be satisfied. Heard. The impugned order indicates that the judgment-debtors have not held calculations despite availing number of opportunities on the basis that the judgment-debtor themselves made submissions before the Court that the matter to make the arrears of the decretal amount in the sum of Rs.2,26,662.58P has been processed with the head office at Panchkula and process would take about one month. On account of non-deposit of the said amount within the said period, the impugned order has been passed. Counsel for the petitioner has referred to order dated 12.8.2009 to urge that the matter has been processed with the head office at Panchkula and the process will take about one month and it was never conceded that the process was with regard to making of said payment but C.R. No. 2907 of 2011 -2- was in connection with making calculations. However, the Court below has misconstrued it otherwise. There is force in this contention. After having perused order dated 12.8.2009 wherein there is mention that the matter is being processed and does not state that sum of Rs.2,26,662.58P is being processed. In view of this, it seems that the impugned order has been passed in a hurried manner without perusing the previous order and as such, the same is set aside. The case is remanded to the Court concerned to pass a fresh order after taking calculations, purely on merits, in accordance with law, without being influenced by any of the observations made hereinabove. The revision petition stands disposed of accordingly. May 3, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) JS JUDGE