-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2037 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1833 OF 2010 Alongwith CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2038 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1833 OF 2010 Pandit G. Chavan. ..Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. AND. Sandip G. Chavan & Ors. ..Applicants. Mr.Harshad Sathe i/b Harshad V. Bhadbhade for the applicants. Mr. Swapnil Walve i/b S. Deshpande for R-6. Mrs. M. S. Bane, B Panel AGP for R-1 to 5. Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : October 19, 2011. P. C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. Civil Application No. 2037 of 2011 is filed for restoration of above writ petition and Civil Application No. 2038 of 2011 is filed for bringing the legal heirs of deceased sole petitioner on record. The petition was placed for admission before this Court on 17/2/2011, at that time the Advocate for the petitioner, on enquiry, came to know that the sole petitioner had expired. srp -: 2 :- Thereafter, the said Advocate prepared an appliction for bringing legal heirs on record and sent the civil application to the legal heirs for affirmation. However, the legal heirs sent the said application without affirmation. In the meanwhile, on 26/7/2011 this Court passed order dismissing the petition as abated. Now, the legal heirs of the sole petitoner has preferred these civil applications. 2. The legal heirs of deceased sole petitioner have explained the delay occurred in bringing themselves on record in paragraph nos 2 to 7 of C.A.No. 2308 of 2011. The explanation, I find to be satisfactorily. In that view of the matter, both the civil applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Necessary amendment in the writ petition be carried out within four weeks from today. Both the Civil Applications stands disposed of. (RANJIT MORE, J.)