IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7078 of 2010 RAVI RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 09.03.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the State and the learned Counsel for the informant. The defence on behalf of the petitioner, a named accused, in a Police case under Sections 302 and 120B of the Penal Code is that the informant is not an eye witness and given the nature of the injuries the deceased may not have been in a condition to make any disclosure. Counsel for the informant points out that two co- accused with common allegations have been denied bail in Cr. Misc. Nos. 45163 and 46044 of 2009. The impugned order of rejection notices 11 bleeding injuries on the person of the deceased when there is also statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. referred to in several paragraphs of the case diary which it is pointed out on behalf of the informant is that of independent witnesses. This application is rejected. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)