IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA MONDAY, THE 21ST JUNE 2010 / 31ST JYAISTHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 259 of 2010() ---------------------------- (CRIME NO.12/2010 OF PEERUMEDU POLICE STATION , IDUKKI DISTRICT) PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 -------------------------------- VINOD KUMAR, S/O. GOPI, AGED 31 YEARS, SHAJI BHAVAN, THENGAKKAL KARA, MANJUMALA VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.M.A.JOSEPH MANAVALAN SRI.P.A.MARTIN ROY RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT -------------------------- STATE OF KERALA THROUGH SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERUMEDU POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. V. TEK CHAND. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K. HEMA, J. --------------------------------------------------- B.A. No.259 of 2010 --------------------------------------------------- Dated this 21st day of June, 2010. ORDER Petition for anticipatory bail. 2. The alleged offences are under Sections 120B, 465, 468, 471 and 34 IPC. According to prosecution, petitioner (A1) along with others hatched a criminal conspiracy and forged a sale deed by which the property belonging to father of petitioner was assigned in the name of petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent of the allegations made. The document was executed as early as in 2004 and no complaint was made by any person regarding any forgery. Petitioner filed a suit against his brother to restrain him from entering into the property. Because of this, at the instance of his brother, a complaint is lodged making false allegations, after 4 years of execution of document. Petitioner appeared before the Investigating Officer on a direction issued by this Court. and explained his innocence . [B.A.No.259/2010] 2 4. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that petitioner was interrogated by the police and he has no objection in granting anticipatory bail to petitioner. 5. On hearing both sides, I am satisfied that anticipatory bail can be granted to petitioner. Hence, the following order is passed: (1) Petitioner shall surrender before the Magistrate Court within 7 days from today. (2) On such surrender, Petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing bond for Rs.10,000/- with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate on the following conditions: (i) Petitioner shall report before the investigating officer as and when directed and co-operate with the investigation. (iii) Petitioner shall not influence or intimidate any witness or tamper with evidence. Petition is allowed. K. HEMA, JUDGE. Krs.