HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.22256 of 2008 WRIT PETITION No.22257 of 2008 WRIT PETITION No.22261 of 2008 WRIT PETITION No.22382 of 2008 and WRIT PETITION No.22398 of 2008 Date: November 23, 2010 WRIT PETITION No.22256 of 2008 Between: M. Annapurna. … Petitioner And 1. A.P. Social Welfare Residential Educational Institutions Society Hyderabad, rep. by its Secretary and 2 others. … Respondents WRIT PETITION No.22257 of 2008 Between: D.K. Vishwanadham … Petitioner And 1. A.P. Social Welfare Residential Educational Institutions Society Hyderabad, rep. by its Secretary and 2 others. … Respondents WRIT PETITION No.22261 of 2008 Between: P. Madhusudhan Rao … Petitioner And 1. A.P. Social Welfare Residential Educational Institutions Society Hyderabad, rep. by its Secretary and 2 others. … Respondents WRIT PETITION No.22382 of 2008 Between: G. Rajasekhar Goud … Petitioner And 1. A.P. Social Welfare Residential Educational Institutions Society Hyderabad, rep. by its Secretary and 2 others. … Respondents WRIT PETITION No.22398 of 2008 Between: J. Subbalakshmi … Petitioner And 1. A.P. Social Welfare Residential Educational Institutions Society Hyderabad, rep. by its Secretary and 2 others. … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.22256 of 2008 WRIT PETITION No.22257 of 2008 WRIT PETITION No.22261 of 2008 WRIT PETITION No.22382 of 2008 and WRIT PETITION No.22398 of 2008 COMMON ORDER: These matters are coming up upon the vacate stay applications filed by the A.P. Social Welfare Residential Educational Institutions Society, the first respondent in the writ petitions, but with the consent of the counsel appearing for the parties the main writ petitions are being disposed of by way of the present order. 2. The cause for grievance for the petitioners in these writ petitions was the action of the first respondent society in cancelling their transfer orders. Such transfers had been effected upon the request made by the petitioners, but shortly thereafter the same were cancelled leading to the filing of these cases. This Court granted interim suspension of the cancellation proceedings, thereby enabling the petitioners to continue at the locations to which they were transferred initially as requested by them. 3. It is now stated that as more than two years have elapsed, the first respondent society would soon be resorting to fresh transfer counselling. Sri A. Rajendra Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner in W.P. No.22398 of 2008 and Smt. Udaya Sri, learned counsel, representing Sri G. Vidyasagar, the counsel for the petitioners in the other cases, fairly conceded that their clients would participate in the impending transfer counselling. It would be open to them to opt for particular locations in such counselling if the rules and procedure so permit. 4. The writ petitions are accordingly disposed of setting aside the proceedings cancelling the petitioners’ request transfers and directing the first respondent society to continue them in the present locations till the next transfer counselling. The petitioners shall participate in the same and shall abide by the decisions of the first respondent society taken in accordance with the rules and procedure. No costs. ____________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J Date: November 23, 2010. BSB