IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI BILAL NAZKI, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 2075 of 2005 Between: S.Tirumaleswari. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Jawaharlal Nahru Technological University, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Registrar and another. .....RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Bilal Nazki, The Acting Chief Justice) It appears that the writ petitioner-appellant was not allowed to sit in the examination on the ground of being short of attendance. She was required to have attended 75% of the working days. Admittedly, she has not attended for the minimum period as required under the regulations. Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the college was supposed to have conducted 90 classes on 90 working days in terms of the regulations, but classes were conducted only on 81 days, therefore, there was shortfall in total working days, and for that the petitioner could not be blamed. The required percentage of attendance is 75 %, but the petitioner has attended the college only on 32 days. Even if the 9 days, for which the college did not work, are included, she falls short of the percentage, which is required under the regulation. Therefore, in our view, there is nothing wrong in the order passed by the learned single Judge. Writ appeal is, therefore, dismissed. No costs. --------------------------------- (Bilal Nazki, A.C.J) 26th October, 2005 --------------------------------- (R.Subhash Reddy, J) LUR