IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43154 of 2010 BALESHWAR YADAV & ANRS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 26.03.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.3 Rupesh Yadav has been arrested by the police and he does not want to press this petition for his release on anticipatory bail. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners are accused for offences punishable under sections 342, 323, 447, 452, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is case and counter case for the same occurrence and the injury is simple in nature. He further submits that petitioner no.1 is the full brother of the informant whereas the remaining petitioners are the family members of petitioner no.1. He also submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated due to family dispute, although the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as is clear from the order of the learned court below. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is 2 allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within fifteen days from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order in the court below, the petitioners, namely, (1) Baleshwar Yadav and (2) Santosh Yadav are directed to be enlarged on bail on executing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Bakhtiarpur P.S. Case No.190 of 2010, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PN (S.N. Hussain,J.)