IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15786 of 2011 Md. Azam Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Rashid Izhar, Adv. For the Informant : Mr. Binod Kumar Singh, Adv. For the State : Mr. Damodar Pd. Tiwary, APP ****** 03. 11.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State who is armed with carbon copy of the case diary. Petitioner is one of the named accused in this case carries with omnibus allegation of inflicting injuries upon prosecution side along with other associates. There is counter version also by way of Ara Muffasil P.S. Case No. 19/2011. Other accused persons are enjoying the privilege of course of regular bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, let the petitioner, namely, Md. Azam, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara, in connection with Ara Muffasil P.S. Case No. 21 of 2 2011, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on three consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/ ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)