IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELIII AT NEW DELHI PLINJAB NETBALL ASSOCIATION ""' Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh with Mr' A' K' PandeY, Advocate. \ versus tiNION OF INDIA & ORS ""' Respondents ' Through: Mr. Roshan Lal Goel, Advocate for .UOI. Mr. Naveen Sharma, Advocate for R-3(i) and R-4' $- t #12 6 #r3 + w.P.(O 44s0l2010 & cM APPL 8944/2010 PIJNJAB NETBALL ASSOCIATION ""' Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh with Mr' A' K' Pandey, Advocate. VETSUS G UNION OF INDIA & ORS Ttuough: Mr. Naveen and R-4. ..... ItesPondents Sharm4 Advocate for R-3(i) lV. P. (C) n-o.14026/09,44s0/10 & 4490-92/10 Puge I of4 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified #r4 + w.P.(C) 4490/2010 & CM APPL 8912/2010 WEST BENGAL STATE NETBALL ASSOCIATION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ral<esh Kumar Singh with Mr. A. K. Pandey, Advocate. VETSUS UMON OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.'Naveen Sharm4 Advocate for R-3(i) and R-4. Mr. Lovkesh Sawhney with Mr. Durgesh Kurnal Pandey, Advocate for IOA. #r5 + w.P.(o 449L120L0 & CM APPL 8913/2010 ! ORISSA NETBALL ASSOCIATION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh with Mr. A. K. F Pandey, Advocate. VETSUS LTNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ravinder Aggarwal, CGSC with Mr. Nitish Gupta, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Naveen Shanna, Advocate for R-3(i) and R-4. Mr. Lovkesh Sawhney with Mr. Durgesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate for IOA. 1 € W. P. (C) No.l4026/09,44s0/10 & 4490-92/10 Page 2 of 4 'J{ AND t #16 ,/ -r- W.P.(C) 449212010 & CM APPL 8914/2010 BII-IAR NETWABLL ASSOCIATION ..... petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh with Mr. A. K. Pandey, Advocate. versus LINION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Jatan Singh, CGSC with Mr. Ashish Kumar Srivastava, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Naveen Shanna, Advocate for R-3(i) and R-4. Mr. Lovkesh Sawhney with Mr. Durgesh Kurnar Pandey, Advocate for IOA. ; CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER 03.03.2011 1. Learned counsel appearing for the parties point out that as far as Writ Pelition (Civil) No. 1402 6 of 2009 is concerned, it challenges the elections held by the Netball Federation of India ('NFI') in the yeu 2006. The term of the office bearers as elected was for four years and that has corne to an ?. o/o W. P. (C) No.|4026/09,44s0/10 & 4490-92/10 Page 3 of4 end. Consequently, the writ petition has been rendered infruqtuous. I disposed of as such. 2. As regards the remaining writ petitions, it is pointed out by learned counsel appearing for the NFI as well as the Indian Olympic Association (.IOA,) that in any event fresh elections have to be held in accordance with the constitution of NFI. Learned counsel for the Petitioner prays that at the fi-esh elections, there should be two independent observers, one appointed fiom the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports ('MYAS') and the other from the IOA. Leamed counsel appearing for Union of India as well as IOA have no objection to this submission. It is stated that as and when fresh elections ar? held, one observer each will be nominated by the MYAS and the IOA. 3. In that view of the matter, no further directions are called for and the writ tis6I t ? petitions and pending applications are disposed of. Order dasti. MARCII 03,20L1 ha lV. P. (C) No.14026/09,4450n0 & 4490-92/10 </ MURALIDH S. AR, J Puge 4 of 4 - k-* c/r\ 51Yc f rr' $- cbJ&'"*"frJ /g"n**; 4N,^