IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 599 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO. 599 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO. 599 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 2120 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 2120 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 2120 OF 2005 Machhindar H. Hire & Ors. ... Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Dinesh K. Shukla for the petitioner. Mr. P.M. Mokashi, AGP for respondent No.1. Mrs. P.A. Purandhare for respondent Nos. 2 & 3. Mr. A.A. Joshi i/b. T.S. Patwardhan for respondent No. 4. Mr. Abhijeet Wagh i/b. Utangale & Co. for respondent No. 5. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 8th December, 2006 : 8th December, 2006 : 8th December, 2006 P.C. . We find from the order dated 26th September, 2006 that eventhough petitioner was not present, we had gone into the merits of the matter and disposed of the same on merits. In the light of that, we are not inclined to grant the motion as prayed for. 2. However, we note in the order dated 26th September, 2006 that in the second line, the word "Samiti" should be substituted by the word "Cemetery". 3. Prothonotary and Sr. Master to carry out said corrections. ( 2 ) 4. With the above observations, the motion stands disposed of. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]