1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R Luna Ram & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO. 1243/2006 ..... Date of Order : 21/02/2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. S.S.Dhillon for the petitioners. Mr. Narendra Moolchandani, P.P. Mr. J.S.Khichi for the respondent No.2. BY THE COURT:- By the instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioners have challenged the order dated 26.8.2006 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Hanumangarh (for short 'the revisional court' hereinafter) in Criminal Revision No.549/2006 whereby while deciding the bail application filed by the petitioner No.1, the revisional court directed to hand over the possession of Tea Hotel to complainant Mahaveer Prasad Sharma. The petitioners are aggrieved by the condition directing to hand over the possession of Tea Hotel to complainant Mahaveer Prasad. 2 I have heard learned counsel for the parties. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the revisional court fell in error in imposing such a condition while granting bail. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the order impugned including the compliance of the condition directing to hand over the possession of the Tea Hotel to complainant Mahaveer vide order impugned dated 26.8.2006, has been complied with and possession has been handed over to the complainant Mahaveer. In my view, the revisional court normally should not have imposed such a condition while entertaining the bail application. But since, the order has been complied with and possession of Tea Hotel has been handed over to the complainant, therefore, in my view, now it is academic issue to decide as to whether the order to this extent is perverse or illegal or can be justified. In the circumstances, therefore, it is made clear that even if any possession is given in compliance of the order impugned, it would not prejudicially effect the rights of the petitioners and it would always be open for the petitioners to agitate their rights before the competent civil court. The criminal misc. petition is accordingly disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR),J. rp