:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. APPEAL NO.542 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.965 OF 2005 Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. .. Appellant v/s. ONGC General Kamgar Sanghatana & ors. .. Respondents Mr.J.P.Cama, senior counsel with Mr.G.D.Talreja for the appellant. Mr.Abhay Kulkarni with Ms.Pooja Kulkarni for the respondent No.1. CORAM : R.M. LODHA AND J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 9th August, 2005 P.C. Having heard the learned senior counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the first respondent, we are satisfied that save and except the clarification that we make, no interference is called for in the impugned order. 2. The clarification that we make is that the order dated 16.4.2003 and the further order dated 5.8.2004 passed by the learned Industrial Tribunal shall not be construed to cover the period from 2nd August, 2002 to 15th April, 2003. 3. We do not deem it necessary to deal with the :2: other contentions raised by the learned senior counsel as those contentions shall be considered by the learned Judge while hearing the writ petiton since the rule has already been issued therein. 3. With the aforesaid clarification, the appeal is disposed of. (R.M.LODHA, (R.M.LODHA, (R.M.LODHA, J.) J.) J.) (J.P. (J.P. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) DEVADHAR, J.) DEVADHAR, J.)