IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 268 OF 2011 SMT. SUJATA DAYANAND CHODANKAR ... Petitioner Versus ASST. DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORT (N) MAPUSA AND ... Respondent Mr. Valmiki Menezes, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. V. Rodrigues, Addl. Government Advocate for Respondent No.1. Coram:- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 4th May, 2011 P.C.: After having heard Mr. Menezes, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, we are of the opinion that the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not available to the Petitioner. The question as to whether the Registering Authority has acted in terms of the agreement between the Petitioner and the banker and whether the banker was justified in making this request or not are matters which have to abide by an adjudication of a competent Court. There are disputed questions of fact which cannot be resolved in Writ jurisdiction. Needless, therefore, to state that any action of the authority must abide by such proceedings as are initiated or are pending and the Petitioner can seek all reliefs permissible therein. Keeping open all the pleas of the affected parties, this Petition is disposed of. S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. F. M. REIS, J. at*