HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.28277 OF 2011 ORDER: The petitioner retired from the service of ASPRTC as Conductor on 31-05-2011 on attaining the age of superannuation. He submitted a representation, dated 22-09-2011, to the respondents ventilating his grievance as regards the fixation of pay scale in the light of the punishments that have imposed against him while in service. His grievance is that no steps were taken thereon. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 3. It is, no doubt, true that the representation was made hardly two weeks before the petitioner approached this Court. However, a decision on the representation made by the petitioner, would have its own impact upon the terminal benefits to be extended to the petitioner. Though it cannot be said that there was undue delay on the part of the respondents in considering the representation, they can be required to pass orders at the earliest. 4. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to pas orders on the representation, dated 22-09-2011, made by the petitioner within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J October 19, 2011. KTL