IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATCA AT BALORE DATEL THIS FHE 2ND DAY OF JUNE 1998 BEFO RE THE HOIV BLE 4R .JU.T ICE P ,VIHvvANATHk HETTY lrit Petition Nb, 15715 of 1998 Smt. diodalingatnma iJ/o Hanumareddeppa Age: Maj or 0cc: Agriculture R/o Veerupapur Taluk 3indhanur Dist, Raichur ,. PETITIONER (By Sri Basavaaj Kareddy, Advocate) -Vs 1. Iyyanna dead by L,R, ,rnt. Amaranna J/o Iyyanna Age: Major, 0cc: Household R/o Veerupapur Taluk: Sindhnur 2, Revenue Inspector Vee rupapur Taluk: Sindhnur 3, Assistant Copmjssioner Lingsugur, at Lingsugur Dist, Raichur REPONDNTS (By Sri N.P.ingri, HCGP) This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash vide Annexure—C dated 4.5.98 by R3 and etc. This petition coming on for preliminary hearing this day, the Court made the following:- —2— ORDER Sri N.P.Singri, learned Govern’nent Pleader is directed to take notice for respondents—2 and 3, 2. The petitioner in this petition has called in question the correctness of the order dated 4th May 1998, a copy of which has been produced as Annexure—C, wherein the 3rd resporent has set aside the entry made by the 2nd respondent showing the name of the petitioner. 3. It is not in dispute that the respondent Smt, Auaranna is t wife of one Iyyanna and the petitioner is the daughter of the brotrier of the said Iyyanna. The said Iyyanna appears to have died issueless, The petitioner claims tights in respect of the lands in question on the basis of a gift deed executed by the said Iyyanna in favour of the petitioner. The vali&ty of the gift deed is in serious dispute between the petitioner and the 1st respondent. The 1st respondent is the natural heir of the said Iyyanna, Under tse circumstances, I do not —3— A find any justification to interfere against the order impugned as the rights of the parties can be legitimately aajudicated upon before the civil court. All the contentions urged y the learned counsel apoearing for the parties on the merits of the claiT are left open to be urged before the civil court. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed subject to the observation made above. 4, 3ri N,P.ingri, learned Government Pleader i given four weeks’ time to file his memo of appearance. C’ I oaf- JUDGE prng/