1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS and Registrar’s Orders. CA/10342/2008 SADASHIV DAGADAPPA KHANKA V/S SHRI SANT DNYANESH In LPA(ST)/17577/2008 WITH CA/10343/2008 In LPAST/17577/2008 1. Heard respective counsel. 2. By the present application, delay of (21) days, occurred in filing the appeal has been sought to be condoned. 3. Shri Deshmukh, learned Advocate for respondent submits that the explanation tendered is not genuine. According to him, the application is liable to be dismissed. 4. In our view, the delay has been properly explained in the civil application. It is not intentional one. There are no laches on the part of applicant. 5. In the interest of justice, the application is allowed. Delay stands condoned. List the appeal for admission after two weeks. (S.S.SHINDE,J.) (S.B.DESHMUKH,J.) Dt. 1.7.2009 akl