IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH OCTOBER 2008 / 7TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 33968 of 2006(R) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ 1. M.K.SASIDHARAN, S/O. KRISHNAN, AGED 51, MANNUKULATHY HOUSE, THODANAL P.O., KOTTAYAM. 2. PRAKASH D., S/O. DEVASSIA, AGED 32, KANDATHIL HOUSE, KIZHATHADIYOOR P.O., PALA. BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON MANAYANI SRI.BENHUR JOSEPH MANAYANI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. PALA CO-OPERATIVE URBAN SOCIETY LTD. NO.K.1017, MATTATHIL BUILDINGS, PALA-686 575, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. COMMITTEE & PALA CO-OPERATIVE URBAN SOCIETY LTD. NO.K.1017, MATTATHIL BUILDINGS, PALA-686 675, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT. 3. THE SECRETARY TO CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 4. THE REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), TRIVANDRUM. 5. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), COLLECTORATE, KOTTAYAM. ADV. SRI.SHAJI THOMAS PORKKATTIL FOR R1,2 SRI.BINU PAUL FOR R1,2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED ANZAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.33968/2006 APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE NOTICE OF THE SAID COMMITTEE MEETING. P2:- COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE IST PETITIONER DT. 14.12.06. P3:- COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DT. 14.12.06. P4:- COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE IST PETITIONER DT. 10.7.06 BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE tss KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.33968 of 2006 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 29th October, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioners approached this court aggrieved by the decision taken by the second respondent pursuant to Ext.P1 notice. The remedy open to the petitioner is to approach the 5th respondent under Rule 176 of the Kerala Cooperative Societies Rules, 1969. Learned counsel appearing for the second respondent submits that the matter has already been considered by the 5th respondent. Therefore, nothing survives in the writ petition. It is dismissed. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. tgs KURIAN JOSEPH, J ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.33968 of 2006 ---------------------------------------------- J U D G M E N T Dated 29th October, 2008.