THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA W.P.NO.13988 OF 2006 DATED; 10.7.2006 BETWEEN: B.Prakash Rao … petitioner. And The State Election Commission, Hyd., … respondent. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA W.P.NO.13988 OF 2006 ORDER: Heard the counsel. The disqualification complained is that the fourth respondent was declared as insolvent in I.P.No.1 of 1992 on 29.2.1996 and despite the same, instead of rejecting the nomination accepting the nomination itself is bad. Several other factual details had been narrated. These aspects cannot be gone into at this stage. The remedy available to the petitioner is by way of election petition to the concerned tribunal. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed with the above observation. No order as to costs. The learned counsel states that a copy of the judgment also is enclosed and inasmuch as it is a judgment rendered in an insolvency petition, this Court can take note of it. The said question also can be agitated before the Election Tribunal. __________ 10.7.2006. mdaa/smr