1 wp-5430-09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION W.P. NO. 5430 OF 2009 Shri.Geetaram Baburao Daundkar and Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. BAIF Development, Research Foundation Urli Kancha. ..Respondent .... Mr.U.P.Warunjikar Adv. for Petitioners Mr.Kiran Bapat Adv. i/b M/s. Desai and Desai Associates for Respondent. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : 29th JULY , 2009 P.C.: 1. The petitioners are employed with respondent no.1. The petitioners have filed Complaint (ULP) No.214 of 2008 for unfair labour practices which relates to the dispute regarding date of birth of the petitioners. In the said complaint, application was preferred by the petitioners for declaration that “ it be declared that the respondent have engaged in unfair labour practices under Items 9 and 10 of Schedule IV of Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions Act temporarily and direct the Respondent to maintain status-quo in respect of the employees 2 wp-5430-09 mentioned in Annexure `A ’ or alternatively direct the Respondent not to terminate or give effect to the date of superannuation of the complainants ”. The said application came to be rejected by the Industrial Court by order dated 15th May, 2009. Being aggrieved thereby, this petition has been preferred. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners on instructions states that the petitioners do not wish to challenge the order dated 15th May, 2009 and the petitioners are willing to go on with the complaint wherein they will lead evidence in respect of date of birth of the petitioners. It is seen that petitioner no.7 retires on 30th June, 2010. In view of this fact, the matter is expedited. The Industrial Court to dispose of the Complaint (ULP) NO.214 of 2008 by 15th May, 2010. 3. Petition is disposed of with above directions. [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]