IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 17TH JANUARY 2008 / 27TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 35602 of 2007(L) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------------- MARIYAMMA MATHEW, PALLATHUPARAMBIL, S.H.MOUNT P.O., KOTTAYAM-6. BY ADV. SRI.M.A.MANHU SRI.M.A.FAYAZ RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY. 2. SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM. 3. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KOTTAYAM. 4. ASHOK KORA ABRAHAM, MARAPURATH, VELOOR, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK SRI.K.PRABHAKARAN, SC, K.S.R.T.C. GP. SRI.P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 35602 of 2007(L) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE TIME SCHEDULE IN RESPECT OF S/C. KL5/M7873 (KEO 477) ON T6HE ROUTE KOTTAYAM-PARIPPU ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY, R.T.A., KOTTAYAM. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 19.7.2007 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DTD. 27.7.2007. EXT.P4: COPY OF OBJECTION DTD. 27.7.2007 FILED BY RARICHAN C. KURIAN. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE OBJECTION DTD. 27.7.2007 FILED BY BIJU K.S. EXT.P6: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 7.8.2007 ISSUED BY FIRST RESPONDENT. EXT.P7: COPY OF ORDER DTD. 7.11.2007 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P8: COPY OF OBJECTION DTD. 27.11.2007 FILED BY PETITIONER. EXT.P9: COPY OF PARTICULARS OF VEHICLE KL.5.L.5989. EXT.P10: COPY OF PARTICULARS OF VEHICLE KL.2.T.7110. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. .......... BKN // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE. ANTONY DOMINIC, J = = = ======== = = = = = W.P.(C).No. 35602 OF 2007 = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 17th day of January, 2008. = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = J U D G M E N T The limited question that is raised in this writ petition is regarding the validity of Exts.P2 to P7 temporary permits to the extent that tentative timings have been fixed. The issue that there is no legal provision enabling to grant temporary permit with tentative timings has already been settled in the judgment reported in Aniyamma Thomas vs. Regional Transport Authority (1996 (2) KLT page 17). If that be so, Exts.P2 and P3 are to be quashed. Therefore, I dispose of the writ petition with a direction that if any application made by 4th respondent, the same shall be disposed of in accordance with the above position. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE bkn/-