IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42761 of 2009 SANJAY SHARMA SON OF KAMESHWAR SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 09/12/2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304B, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that after unnatural death of the deceased, an U.D. case was instituted by father of the petitioner and the last rites were attended by the family members of the deceased and thereafter 22 days later, the present Complaint was filed alleging that it was for demand of dowry that the petitioner who is the husband and other inlaws had committed the murder of the deceased but there is no explanation about delay, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 19.8.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, in connection with Singhwara P.S. Case No. 06 of 2008 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present 2 on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)