IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY, THE 9TH JUNE 2009 / 19TH JYAISHTA 1931 Crl.MC.No. 1884 of 2009() ------------------------- CC.46/2007 of CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, THODUPUZHA .................... (CRIME NO.779/2006 OF THODUPUZHA POLICE STATION) PETITIONER(S): IST ACCUSED: ------------------------------------------------ PRASAD MATHEW, AGED 27 YEARS, S/O.MATHEW, PALLIYARADIYIL HOUSE, ANAKAYAM, VELLYAMATTOM, THODUPUZHA. BY ADVS. MR.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN, MR.P.P.BIJU. RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: ---------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR. GIKKU JACOB THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J. ------------------------------------------ CRL.M.C.NO.1884 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------ Dated 9th June 2009 O R D E R Petitioner is first accused in C.C.46/2007 on the file of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thodupuzha. Offences alleged are under Sections 51, 52(A), 63 and 68 (A) of Copy Rights Act. This petition is filed for a direction to the Magistrate to dispose the application for bail when the petitioner moves the same on the date of his surrender. 2. When an accused surrenders and files an application before the Magistrate, Magistrate is expected to pass orders in the application without delay. I find no reason to believe that learned Magistrate is not aware of the various decisions of this court as well as the Apex Court on the point or that Magistrate will not act in accordance with law. Hence no direction is warranted. Petition is therefore dismissed. M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE. uj.