iii sits. dsdti LAAJid (F Kn4i1nLsS a! i1 ü,aLClit JjS2J Lnw ijts LLsi 1 jf UI JUN 1998 jJ545 Mn,JLL1a Ut. wtui 2jjjj(4 No.15)05/1998 01:1 :G, flflappaWaifly Sc uoflrktaraJu Naicjj major, it/c zaa Road Sakaleshpur 1 own, Macsan, ,... Petttiorur, (ôy on K. Gopalctarishna, nlv.) AiiiR i. Te Circle inspector of PolIce akaleshpura Town, Maccar Dist. L Tne Subinspector, Town tOlice Station, Sakaleshpur Macsan sist. j, she Geologist. t. of M!nes o. Geology, Miu7, Kuempu nagar, fiassan?3 201. 4. Lie Lahsiliar oakclesnpur Lown tiassan ist, ite etits. W,t thea und& arts,a2o & cS? of’ the Constitution of India, prin to dire t RI t 3 to stop U iilegdi. us ji g and ir tte scheauled area, etc. corn ng on for Preliminary dearirg t sd.y the urtm etic. olowrg I Petitioner claims in this writ petition that us was awaráei a licence for quarrying san1 in the demavatby river bel oaer an extent of 13.5 acres aajnining dy,Nos. 211, 222, 223, 22+, 5 ant 6 of ak.le5hpUr, as san tstrict. That perioi hnd expired. Ihereafter, petitioner had files neees:3r) ajiplication before tue concerned authorities for renewal of the quarrying licence. that application oftfte petitioner for renewal ha. bet rejected cy the authorities. Petitioner also states in the writ petition that he has already filea an appeal against the ordais made by the resondenteauthority rejecting his application for renews) of iarrying licence an1 tat ap’ication i3 pealing for consiJeratiosi. 2. In thia petition, petitioner’s grievance i trat some persons of tue vilsage are illegally quarryin sun in the aforesait 9y.Nos. It is hs case oetore tna.e Gzirt that he nsa alreadr compfline’i before tne re porilents to take apprrpriate action against tuose persorir, who are car ing on illegal quarrying of saul. according to him, the resporuents 1 a a jê a ar not taking any action and It is for this reason, he is oefee this court toiirect the respondents 1 to 3 to stop the illegal quarrying of sand in the scheduled area, 3, PetiUonr has no rignt in the land. As on toiay, he does not flare any al licence to quarry the sana in the aforealu Sy,Nos, If for any reason, some other peror are quarrying tFe sand in the aforesaja Sy,Nos,, the respondents will definitely take appropriate action to stop the illegal quarrying, L, In my new, petitioner cannot have any grievance. It is for the state authorities to protect their interest in the schedulea lana since it is a Gorernment lafld, Now that the petitioner nas hrought to the notice o the respon dents the illegal quarrying of sand tnat is taki place in tne scrieauled Iaci, I ani conflaent that tn respondent-autHorities will taKe apprLpr’ate action to stop the illegal qaarrying in the aforesala sneduIeI 1fld. 5, in ew of t abo ía, I o notfind any good ground to grant the r3lief sought for oj the , ,14, , petitioner, accordinglj, I declire entertain tnis writ petition and accordinIy it is rejected. thPs/04O6 199 8