IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 7132 of 2008. Date of Decision: 26th March, 2009. Smt. Kamla Devi Sharma ....Petitioner through Mr. Sanjay Vij, Advocate Versus HUDA & Ors. ...Respondents through Mr. Ajay Nara, Advocate Mr. Surinder Gandhi, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL) The petitioner seeks quashing of the cancellation of allotment of Plot No. 928, Phase-I, Bahadurgarh and seeks validation of the said allotment. Notice of motion was issued and in response thereto, the respondents have filed their reply. On 13.2.2009, learned counsel for the petitioner made an offer that the petitioner is ready and willing to get the plot re-allotted on payment of the current market price. The matter was accordingly adjourned to enable learned counsel for the respondents to have instructions. Mr. Ajay Nara, learned counsel for respondents No. 1 to 3 states at the bar that a plot measuring 500 square yards shall be allotted to the petitioner. However, the number thereof shall be allotted to her on the basis of a mini draw of lots. This offer is acceptable to the petitioner. Let the limited draw of lots for the purpose of identifying the plot number to be allotted to the petitioner be held as early as possible but not beyond a period of one month from today. The allotment letter along with other terms and conditions including the Payment Schedule shall thereafter be issued in favour of the petitioner within two weeks. Needless to say that the payments already made by the petitioner towards the allotment of the previous plot shall be adjusted against the new allotment. Disposed of. Dasti March 26, 2009. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE