IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Writ Petition No. 2224 of 2010 Date of Decision: February 16, 2011 Kawal ..... Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana and others. .....Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Parshad, DAG, Haryana for respondent-State. ***** JORA SINGH, J (ORAL) This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus with a roving writ for the release of detenues as mentioned in Para No. 4 of the petition from the illegal custody of respondents No.5 to 7 (owner of GBS brick kiln). Learned State has filed reply alongwith statement of Tinku (Annexure R-1) and statement of Bolas (Annexure R-2) and the same are taken on record. Reply is to the effect that none of the alleged detenues was found in illegal detention of respondents No.5 to 7. In view of the abovesaid reply coupled with statements, no further action is required to be taken. Hence, the present has become infructuous and is dismissed accordingly. February 16, 2011 (JORA SINGH) sham JUDGE