IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 18762 of 2008 Between: Neethipudi Ganesh Babu S/o. Late. N. Ganapathi Rao Nagaram, Nagaram Village, Mamidikuduru Mandal, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District at Kakinada. 2 The Sub Divisional Police Offcer / Dy. Superintendent of Police, Amalapuram, East Godavari District. 3 The Station House Officer, Nagaram P.S., East Godavari District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the respondents in not closing rowdy sheet in Ref.No.29 dt. 10.10.1999 opened by S.H.O. Nagaram P.S., pursuant to the orders in W.P.No.3434/2001 dt. 22.12.2003 and also by not considering the representations made by the petitioner dt. 10.02.2004, 17.7.2004 & 6.1.2007 as illegal, arbitrary, colorable exercise of power and for a consequential order directing the respondents to close the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner in Ref. No.29 dt. 10.10.1999 opened by S.H.O. Nagaram P.S., also to pay damages to the petitioner for continuation of rowdy sheet and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.CH.DHANAMJAYA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI W.P.NO.18762 OF 2008 ORDER This writ petition is ﬁled seeking a declaration that the action of the respondents in continuing the rowdy sheet against the petitioner on the ﬁle of the S.H.O, Nagaram P.S. as arbitrary and illegal. When the matter is taken up for consideration the learned Government Pleader for Home, under instructions, stated that the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner on 20-08-1999 was closed on 30-08-2008 pursuant to the permission accorded by the Sub-Divisional Police Oﬃcer, Amalapuram. The said fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Hence no further enquiry is necessary. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. _____________ G.ROHINI,J 11th November,2008 *TSNR