IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.1340 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision:28.02.2011 Jagan Nath . . .Petitioner Versus Ajay Kumar alias Sanjay Kumar and another . . . Respondents ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Munish Jolly, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner has not argued on merits and has rather, on instructions received from his client, prayed for grant of time to vacate the demised premises. It is submitted that the petitioner is 82 years of age and is in possession of the demised premises from the year 1958. In view of the stand taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner present revision petition is dismissed on merits but a period of six months from today is granted to the petitioner to vacate the demised premises subject to his furnishing adequate undertaking before the Rent Controller within 15 days from today on receipt of certified copy of this order and shall keep on paying the rent during that subsequent period of six months when he will remain in possession by virtue of this order. It is made clear that he should also pay arrears of rent, if any, due. If any of the condition imposed by this Court in this order is violated then this revision petition shall be deemed to be dismissed and for the violation of undertaking, which is to be furnished within 15 days from today, he shall be liable for contempt proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) FEBRUARY 28, 2011 JUDGE Vivek