1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO: 4996/2008 (Smt.Palibai w/o Banduji Gotami vs. Divl.Commissioner and others) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram Court's or Judges Order appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. ................................................................................................................................... CORAM: B.P.DHARMADHIKARI DATED: 27th November,2008. *** Heard Advocate Dhage for petitioner. He contends that the notice of no confidence meeting was not properly served upon the petitioner and also the first appellate authority has not applied its mind correctly because, when the proceedings reveal that motion was carried by 15 members in its favour while two voting against it, the said authority has recorded that total strength was only 15 and 14 voted in favour of the motion; while one opposed it. 2. Learned AGP Mrs Bodade points out that the Divisional Commissioner, the further appellate authority, has correctly appreciated this position. I have perused both the orders. The total number of members in Gram Panchayat is not in dispute and the fact that motion has been carried by majority of 15: 2 is also not in dispute. The petitioner did not remain present and his contention that notice was not validly served, is not substantiated at all. 2 3. In view of the concurrent finding in this respect, I do not find any merit in the petition. Writ Petition is dismissed. JUDGE sahare