IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-34429 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 15.11.2011 Gurpreet Sidhu and another ....Petitioners Versus Amrita Sidhu ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. R.S. Pandher, Advocate, for the petitioners. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that Child Development Project Officer has submitted his report Annexure P-11 before the Magistrate saying that case of domestic violence is not made out against the petitioners herein and Magistrate despite of the report of CDPO is proceeding with the case without taking into consideration report of CDPO, which is sine quo non to pass any order on an application moved under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners has vehemently argued that if Magistrate is directed to take into consideration report (Annexure P-11) received by him from the CDPO before proceeding further on the application, he will feel satisfied. Present petition is disposed of with the direction to the Magistrate to take decision on the report (Annexure P-11) of CDPO before proceeding further on the application moved by the respondent. (Alok Singh) Judge November 15, 2011 R.S.