IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17027 of 2009 1. JEETENDRA KUMAR SINGH S/O VIDYA NANDAN SINGH R/O VILL- KAILITAND, P.S- SANTA, P.S- BHAGWANPUR, DISTT- VAISHALI Versus 1. ELECTION COMMISSION,BIHAR PATNA 2. COLLECTOR VAISHALI CUM DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER, VAISHALI 3. PRAKHAND VIKAS PADADHIKARI CUM ELECTION OFFICER, BHAGWANPUR, DISTT- VAISHALI 4. LALIT KUAMR SAHI S./O YUGAL KISHORE SAHI, R/O VILL- PRATAP TAND, P.S- BHAGWANPUR, DISTT- VAISHALI 5. AWADH BIHARI SINGH S/O RAM PRASIDH SINGH R/O VILL- PRATAP TANJD, P.S- BHAGWANPUR, DISTT- VAISHALI 6. IRSAD ASDAK S/O LAT TAWARAKH HUSSAIN R/O VILL- PRATAP TAND, P.S- BHAGWANPUR, DISTT- VAISHALI 7. MANOJ KUMAR S/O DEPAN SHUKLA R/O VILL- PRATAP TAND, P.S- BHGAWANPUR, DISTT- VAISHALI 8. MARKANDEY THAKUR S/O PARMESHWAR THAKUR, R/O VILL- KAILI TAND, P.S- BHAGWANPUR, DISTT- VAISHALI 9. RAJ KISHORE THAKUR S/O LATE GAGAN DEO THAKUR, R/O VILL-PRATAP TANJD, P.S- BHAGWANPUR, DISTT- VAISHALI 10. RAJIV KUMAR S/O HARI NATH SINGH, R/O VILL- SAHTHA, P.S- BHAGWANPUR, DISTT- VAISHALI 11. RAJI THAKUR S/O BALI RAM THAKUR R/O VILL- PRATAP TANJD, P.S- BHAGWANPUR, DISTT- VAISHALI 12. RAJIV RANJAN SAHI S/O HEM NARAYAN SAHI R/O VILL- PRATAP TANJD, P.S- BHAGWANPUR, DISTT- VAISHALI 13. RAJESH KUMAR S/O SURENDRA PANDEY R/O VILL- PRATAP TAND, P.S- BHAGWANPUR, DISTT- VAISHALI 14. RAM NARESH PANDIT S/O BATU PANDIT R/O VILL- PRATA TAND, P.S- BHAGWANPUR, DISTT- VAISHALI 15. SATISH KUAMR SINGH S/O MAHENDRA SINGH R/O VILL- SAHTHA, P.S- BHAGWANPUR, DISTT- VAISHALI 16. ELECTION TRIBUNAL VAISHALI, HAJIPUR ----------- 2. 13.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State Election Commission. The petitioner was a candidate for the office of Mukhiya in the Gram Panchayat Raj Pratap Tand, East Zone. Having been unsuccessful, he filed 2 Election Case No. 67 of 2006. It has been dismissed by the Civil Judge, Ist Vaishali at Hajipur on 9.10.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner finds it difficult to satisfy the Court that any documentary evidence was placed by the petitioner as the plaintiff in the suit of any written objection filed by him during counting in accordance with Rule-79 of the Bihar Panchayat Election Rules. In fact, the petitioner in Paragraph-11 of the writ application explicitly acknowledges that no such written objection was exhibited by him in the trial Court. In absence of any objection filed in writing during counting of any alleged irregularity, as required by Rule 79 of the Rules, there is any error in the judgment calling for interference. The Court finds no merit in this application. It is accordingly dismissed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)