IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23936 of 2008 EKRAMUL HASSAN & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 3.7.2008. Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the petitioner about the satus of petitioner no.4. Petitioner no.1 is husband petitioner no.2 is father-in-law, petitioner no.3 is brother-in-law and petitioner no.4 is sister-in-law of the complainant. They are apprehending their arrest in connection with Case no.C.A.162 of 2008 registered for offence under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Counsel for the petitioner submits that because the case for restitution of conjugal life has been filed by the petitioner no.1, in reaction the present case has been filed. The husband and family members are ready to keep the complainant. Considering the aforesaid fact prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. The petitioners namely 1. Ekramul hassan 2. Abdul Samad 3. Aaisha Khatoon and 4. Ashmara Khatoon are directed to surrender before the S.D.J.M.Katihar within four weeks from today and on their so surrendering they shall be enlarged on bail on their furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M.Katihar in connection with Case No.C.A.162 of 2008 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Sss/- (Mridula Mishra, J) - 2 -