IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1377 of 2011 SUDHIR KUMAR @ GORAKH CHAUDHARY, SON OF SRI LAL BABU CHAUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 23.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 55 of 2010 registered under Section 366 (A) of the Indian Penal Code. Admittedly, the victim girl has returned to her home safely and in her statement, recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C., she has stated that she was taken away by the petitioner for fun giving threat. Moreover, the statement of victim reflects that petitioner did nothing with the victim girl and after institution of the present case the victim was brought to her home by the petitioner himself. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is also a boy of tender age and, as a matter of fact, there was some intimacy between the petitioner and the victim girl but subsequently, victim girl made her statement under the influence of her parents. In view of the aforesaid submissions as well as facts and circumstances of the case, above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur (Patna) in connection with above stated Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 55 of 2010. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)