IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M No.35924-M of 2009 Date of Decision:9.3.2010 Roop Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. H.S. Rakhra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. The only prayer made in the present petition is for issuance of direction to the official respondent No.2 to take action on the complaint of the petitioner keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case. Reply has been filed by way of affidavit of Gurdeep Singh, PPS, D.S.P. Sub Division, Muktsar on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2. As per the reply, an FIR No.18 dated 17.1.2010 has been registered under Section 379 IPC at Police Station City Muktsar, on the application made by the petitioner. In view of the said reply, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. 9.3.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE