SIisGLE RFM"N tf::(eso"i^^ IN THE HIGILCOURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fSl N0. ^o'^'S. /2006 PETITIONER A^ b.-<<7" y.fy' . ,0\<^-vJ9.-' V. •s Rohit Kumar Rafhiya, Son of Shri Masat Raia Rathiya, Aged about 37 years, Assistant Teacher, Prim.ary School Ganjaipali, Block Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) '<• /-.^" ' ^.^- RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. ra^-1^1 "8-iaS State of Chhatdsgarh, Through fhe Secretary, Departiaent of Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). The Comraissioner, Tribal Welfare Department Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Head Office -Raigarh (C.G.). 4. The District Coordinator, Tribal WeUare Departm.ent, Head Of&ce- Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER _ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE XI-HC-22 an^rqir R-fi+3D^?r st»li°bBf??T StlHI'ti Bab'u va>^' 3^'<iwicf<l, ®T(I*I'IS,isiowy 3fl^l ^sich —..tA.''.^..(.SJ.iJ.Q:7$Z3 iiHni shHrai W^ 200 6 (^•b.A sn^T sttirai flfttT 19.12.2006 iVsr. Ashwini Shukla, cd •s. leriT insei for the petitioners. ja, Depipty Soverriment Afivocate for the ith the consent of the mctter is heard finaily ai Common order dictat^d in W.P.(s) No. 7072/2006, passed separa+ely. chi<i[tn41*i Hi4dT ^f te^ <I^I%K • ^iSri^ITW^T earned counse! for the pcrties, id disposed of. Sd/- Satish K.Agnifaotri Judge (^y^) HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH ATLBILASPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. A6NIj-10TKL_J. WRFT PETTTION (5.) N0. 7072 OF 2006 Petitioner Navin Chand Sai Paikara versus ^. ResDondents State of Chhattisgarh and others WRTT PETTTEON (S.) N0.7073 OF 200& Petitioner Rohit Kumar Rathiya versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and others WRTT PETTTION (S.) N0.7074 OF 2006 Petitioner Rajnand Kumor Paikara Versus ftespondents State of Chhat^sgarh and others Present : Mr. Ashwini Shukla counsel for the petitioners. Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Sovernment Advocate for •Hie respondents/State ORDER (Passedon 19th bayofDecember, Z006) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as also for •ttie State/respondents jointly submit that the facts cnd 2 questjon of law involved in the present batch of writ petitions are squarely co(rered by -rfie decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwoj vs. Mwiicipal Corporafion, Dwy and anothei3'. 2. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petitions are disposed of in tsrms of the decision of this Court in the mtrtter of Yashwent Kumar BharadwaJ (Supra), subject to verification of the fact os to whether 1tie petitioners have acquired B.T.I. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further whe-rfier they have been paid two odvance increments or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on 1+ie record of the connected writ petjtions. .-_____ ~( SdA Satish K.Agmhrttri Judge 1 2006(II) PJR-C696 Bablu