IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 30TH JUNE 2008 / 9TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 19576 of 2008(E) PETITIONERS: 1. G.ANIL KUMAR, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, SABARIMALA, PATHANAMTHITTA DIST. 2. V.HARIKUMAR, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, ALUVA MAHADEVA TEMPLE, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. P.D.VIMAL KUMAR, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, CHETTIKULANGARA DEVASWOM, MAVELIKKARA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SR.) SRI.S.SUJIN RESPONDENTS: 1. THE DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, NANTHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, NANTHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADV. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN, SC, TDB FOR R1-2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C).No.19576 of 2008 W ------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of June, 2008. JUDGMENT I heard learned senior counsel for the petitioners Sri.N.N.Sugunapalan and the learned standing counsel for the Devaswom Board Sri.Nagaraj Narayanan. 2. Learned Senior Counsel Sri.Sugunapalan submits Ext.P4 judgment was pronounced on 13.6.2008 directing the Board to consider Exts.P4 and P5 and to take suitable action thereon. Ext.P5 proceedings were issued by the Devaswom Board on 26.6.2008, but it has not taken note of the directions contained in Ext.P4. 3. Sri.Nagaraj Narayanan, learned counsel for the Devaswom Board, submits that orders pursuant to Ext.P4 are yet to be issued and Ext.P5 is essentially a reiteration of the earlier order. If that is so, the only direction required, at this stage, in my view, is one to the Board to proceed to act in accordance with the directions contained in Ext.P4 judgment. Subject to this, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (V.GIRI) JUDGE sk/ //true copy// P.S. To Judge