1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 288 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 288 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 288 OF 2007 IN IN IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 172 OF 2007 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 172 OF 2007 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 172 OF 2007 Adheer Ramesh Pai. .. Applicant. vs. Shweta Adheer Pai. .. Respondent. Mr. R.L. Nerlekar for Applicant. Ms. S.T. Bairagdav h/f Siddique & Asso. for respondent. .. CORAM: J.N. PATEL & CORAM: J.N. PATEL & CORAM: J.N. PATEL & A.A. SAYED, JJ. A.A. SAYED, JJ. A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE: 24TH OCTOBER, 2007. DATE: 24TH OCTOBER, 2007. DATE: 24TH OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. . We do not find any reason to grant stay to the impugned judgment and decree passed by the Family Court. The appellant is granted time to deposit the amount awarded by the Family Court towards return of Stridhan which was in the form of cash which has been computed at Rs. 3 lacs and a sum of Rs. 10 lacs lumpsum towards permanent alimony to the respondent. 2 The amount to be deposited on or before 31st December, 2007 in this Court. On the appellant depositing the amount the same be invested in term deposit with any nationalised bank in the maiden name of the respondent initially for a period of 37 months to be renewed from time to time until further orders with the condition that the respondent will be entitled to withdraw monthly interest on such term deposit for her utilisation. 2. The parties are at liberty to move this Court in case they arrive at an amicable settlement. 3. On compliance of this order, there will be stay in terms of prayer clause (a). 4. The civil application stands disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. (J.N. Patel, J. ) (J.N. Patel, J. ) (J.N. Patel, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. )