IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28425 of 2009 BHUKHAN YADAV @ BHUKHAN MAHTO SON OF LATE HARI YADAV @ LATE HORIL MAHTO RESIDENT OF VILLAGE LILABARAN, P.S. SIMARTALLA, DISTT. JAMUI. ------PETITIONER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 30/10/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the Chachia Sasur of the victim lady. The District Judge has indicated that the petitioner has been summoned under Section 88 of the Criminal Procedure Code, and therefore, he will be granted bail on his appearance in the Court. Learned counsel on the other hand submits that many a times, the accused are not granted bail rather they are taken in custody even though summons are issued under Section 88 of the Criminal Procedure Code. It is also submitted that after 16 years of marriage the present case has been filed. Finally learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is a dispute between the husband and wife and not the petitioner. Be that as it may, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks on furnishing 2 bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Banka, in connection with Complaint Case No. 729 of 2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. S.Ali (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)