IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP (T) No.11553 of 2008 Date of decision : June 3, 2011 Satish Kumar and another …Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Assistant Advocate General. Surjit Singh, Judge(Oral) Heard and gone through the record. 2. It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter is covered by judgment dated 12th May, 2011 of this Court, delivered in CWP(T) No.11576 of 2008, titled Man Chand Sharma and others versus State of H.P. and others. Consequently, impugned letter Annexure A-6, is quashed and the respondents/competent authority is directed to re-consider the entire matter, in the light of the stipulation contained in para-11 of Career Progression Scheme, dated 4th August, 2001, Annexure A-3, with regard to grant of proficiency step up in favour of the petitioners, on completion of 24 years of service, within three months, from the date of production of a copy of this judgment, by the petitioners. June 3, 2011(sd) ( Surjit Singh ), J Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?