IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 2ND APRIL 2007 / 12TH CHAITHRA 1929 OP.No. 3218 of 2000(G) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER: M.S BAGSWIG, HI TECH LIMITED VYTTILA, KOCHI-682 019 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR.C.R.VEERAN, S/O RAMASWAMY IYER AGED 70 YEARS VISALA BHAVAN CHITTOOR ROAD, COCHIN-682 911. BY ADV. SRI.ABRAHAM JOHN RESPONDENTS: 1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD REPRESENTED BY VYDYUTHI BHAVAN THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 004. 2. THE SPECIAL OFFICER (REVENUE) KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VYDYUTHI BHAVAN THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 004. 3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VYTTILA DIVISION, COCHIN 682 019. BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN SC FOR K.S.E.B. SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC FOR KSEB SRI.C.RAGHAVAN, SC, KSEB THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/04/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: OP.No. 3218 of 2000(G) ORDER ON C.M.P.NO.5218 OF 2000 IN O.P.NO.3218 OF 2000 DISMISSED. SD/- KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: Ext.P1: True photocopy of letter No.HTB GI 14/99-2000 dated 16-12-1999 issued by the 2nd respondent to the petitioner. Ext.P2: True photocopy of the representation dated 27.10.1999 given by the petitioner to the 3rd respondent. Ext.P3: True photocopy of the electricity bill dated 10.12.1999 delivered to the petitioner. Ext.P4: True photocopy of the electricity bill dated 10.1.2000. Ext.P5: True photocopy of reminder dated 18.1.2000 of the petitioner. // True copy // P.A. to Judge jes KURIAN JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------------- O.P.3218 OF 2000 -------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT Dated 2nd April, 2007 KURIAN JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - O.P.NO.3218 OF 2000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 2nd day of April 2007 JUDGMENT Petitioner is aggrieved by Exts.P3 and P4. It is submitted that if Ext.P2 representation is considered, there will be no occassion for the additional security. Writ petition is hence disposed of with direction to the third respondent/competent authority to consider Ext.P2 with notice to the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Fate of the interim order dated 31.1.2000 in C.M.P.5218/2000 will depend on the order thus passed as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE jes