IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36279 of 2008 1. SITA RAM CHANDRABANSHI S/O CHANDRIKA RAM (R/O VILL. TIUARA, P.S. NAUHATTA, DIST. ROHTAS) 2. ARJUN CHANDRABANSHI S/O LATE SATYA NARAIN CHANDRABANSHI 3. ARVIND CHANDRABANSHI S/O LATE SATYA NARAIN CHANDRABANSHI 4. SUNITA DEVI W/O ARJUN CHANDRABANSHI ( ALL R/0 VILL. NIMHAT, P.S. NAUHATTA, DIST. ROHTAS) Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 20.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioner no.1 is the maternal uncle of the husband of the informant, petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are “Bhaisur” and “Devar” and petitioner no.4 is “Gotni” of the informant are accused in a case registered for the offences under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted that petitioners have been implicated without any justification for vague allegation. However, the husband of the informant is in custody as stated in paragraph no. 10 of the bail petition. It is further submitted that the present F.I.R. has been filed for ulterior purposes that too after inordinate delay as the informant alleges that she was driven out from the matrimonial house in the year 2005 and the F.I.R. has been lodged in the month of December 2007. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State is not in a position to refute the submissions made on behalf of the petitioners. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioners named above be released on bail on - 2 - furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas, at Sasaram, in connection with Nauhatta P.S. Case No. 58/2007 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sym ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)