IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI TUESDAY, THE 27TH JANUARY 2009 / 7TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 3267 of 2008(L) ----------------------------------- AGAINST ORDER IN EP 71/2007 IN RCP.199/1985 OF THE MUNSIFF COURT,KOZHIKODE-II .................... PETITIONER: ------------------- K.MOIDEEN KOYA, AGED 51, S/O.BICHU MOIDEENKUTTY, ABACK, CHALIYAM, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.V.RAJENDRAN (PERUMBAVOOR) SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE KIZHAKKAMBALAM RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. N.V.AVARANKUTTY, NALAKATH VALAPPIL, KADALUNDI AMSOM, PAZHANJANOOR DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK. (DIED). 2. FATHIMA, AGED 67, W/O.LATE N.V.AVARANKUTTY, NALAKATH VALAPPIL, KADALUNDI AMSOM, PAZHANJANOOR DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK. 3. MUHAMMED BASHEER, AGED 52, S/O.LATE AVARANKUTTY, NALAKATH VALAPPIL, KADALUNDI AMSOM, PAZHANJANOOR DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK. 4. MEHABOOB, AGED 49, S/O.LATE AVARANKUTTY, NALAKATH VALAPPIL, KADALUNDI AMSOM, PAZHANJANNOR DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK. 5. SULAIKHA, AGED 46, D/O.LATE AVARANKUTTY NALAKATH VALAPPIL, KADALUNDI AMSOM, PAZHANJANOOR DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK. 6. KHADEEJA, AGED 41, D/O.LATE AVARANKUTTY NALAKATH VALAPPIL, KADALUNDI AMSOM, PAZHANJANOOR DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK. 7. ABDUL KAREEM, AGED 38, S/O.LATE AVARANKUTTY, NALAKATH VALAPPIL, KADALUNDI AMSOM,PAZHANJANOOR DESOM,KOZHIKODE TALUK W.P.(C) NO.3267 OF 2008 - 2 - 8. ABDUL LATHEEF, AGED 43, S/O.LATE AVARANKUTTY, NALAKATH VALAPPIL, KADALUNDI AMSOM, PAZHANJANOOR DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK/. BY ADV.SMT.MANJU ANTONY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.3267 of 2008-L ------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 27th day of January, 2009 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. Mr.V.Rajendran Perumbavoor, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that M.J.C.No.20 of 2008 was allowed by this Court and the Civil Revision Petition has been restored. He further submits that in the Civil Revision Petition this Court has granted stay of the execution proceedings. Under the above circumstances, we are of the view that this writ petition has become infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE (JUDGE) M.C.HARI RANI (JUDGE) vns