a-^> 'T^r ^ii^Kri^^ ^Til^^Ko, f®i<ni^^< *11*1CTI <1»<(PS ""^t 200 ^T^T ^? Rl^jJ^ ^NT^i^tsh^i^ ^n^T^sf^ (^t^^?) ^wiW t< a ^Slt^i Sinale Bench; Hon'ble Mrl W.P. fs1 Petitioners (Petition U/A 226 of 1. Mani Pras 2. Dine qii^i^i^h N^^? "^ 'fe^' <I^i^s< ^^fW3^T Justice Dhirendra Mishra) Mo.437/09 Constitution of India) sh Kumar Sinha, son of late Dashrath ad Sinha, aged residjence of Jashpur, Jash^ur, Chhattisgarh. about 41 Tahsil and years, District sh Tiwari, son of Yamuna Tiwari, aged aboL|t 40 years, residence of Bagicha, Distr|ct Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Harn|arayan Tiwari, son of M.N. Tiwari, aged aboL|t 37 years, residence of Jashpur, Tehsil &Di^ Vs Respondents I.Stat^ Dep^ Raipl 2. Chiei Raipl 3. Divisl Divisl itrict Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, irtment of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, jr, Chhattisgarh. Forest Conservator, Chattisgarh. jr, Chhattisgarh. ional Forest Officer, Jashpur Forest ion, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. Present: Mr. C.J.K. Rao, Adv. forthe petitior|ers. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for tl[ie State. 23.01.2009 Heard. Grievance of the petitioners | were given casual/temporary ap^ 16.8.94 in the Forest Departmentj working as daily wage employee^ dated 5.3.2008 the petitioners are| they bave not been regularized. |in this petition is that the petitioners ^ointmenton 28.2.91, 17.10.93& Forest Division Jashpurand were t. As per circular of Annexure P-2 |entitled for regularization, however, ^ll^^ ^^^yU^ <(^-1i^lM—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000. ;^ •^,-—?^1 '^, ^.,...-y.-;? '3'^ ^iNi<n^/ ^Ti1^4i<o, ^TRT^ <nwff<ipn^» "W^ 200 ^H^?T 'TWF (<jc(I^«k^) ^TOi^Tl^l^ "TOT^T^I^NJ^ ^L Learned counsel for the pressing this petition at this stage] petitioners to file representation b] respondents for their regularizatio| decide their representation withir| Annexure P-2. Ms. Jain, learned panel la\^ that if the petitioners file repre| services before the competent au] shall be considered and decidedl period of six weeks from the date <\ In view of the above subm| the parties, this petition is dispos^ make representation for regulari| certified copy of this order, bef^ respondents. On such represent^ considered and decided by the co| in accordance with law within a p receipt of representation. Howe^ verification by the State of the fact; Consequently, I.A.No.1 als^ Certified copy as per rules. ^FSfe^N 'RTR^f tl ^^ <f^t^K ^^^H 311^1 petitioners submits that he is not however, he prays for liberty to the efore the competent authority of the i, who. in turn, be further directed to specified period, as per circular of ^yer appearing for the State submits >entation for regularization of their thority of the respondents, the same by the competent authority within a (f receipt of representation. ssions made by learned counsel for kd of with liberty to the petitioners to 2:ation of their services along with )re the competent authority of the tion being made, the same shall be nnpetent authority ofcth'e respondents eriod of six weeks from the date of ^er, this order shall be subject to > pleading in the petition. ) stands disposed of. Sd/- DtiirendraMishra Judge ^m^W^^T^IS^ <S^-ik^N—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000.