HIGH CTlURT^FCHHATTISeARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 7S21 of 2001 PETITIONERS RESPONDBNTS l ^' 1 Ratiya Ram aged aboilt 59 years son of Late Kaadra Ram, workiug as Gangman, under P.W.D. - Kansabel, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.), R/o. ViU. Tainasingha, PO. Bandarehuwan, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) (1.1.1974) 2! Dhansingh Sai, aged aboiit 50 years, son of Khorsa Sai, presenfly workiag as Gangman, under the P.W.D. - Kausabel, R/o. vfflage - Pongro, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) (year 1981) 3 Jagesbwar, aged about 50 years, son of Madhii Rain, working as Ganginan, under P.W.D. - Kansabel, DistL Jashpur (C.G.) R/o.Vffl. N. Bbali, Post Chechwa, Distt. Jiashpur (C.G.) (year 1981) Versus State of Chhattisgarh, throiigh the Secretary Department of Public Works, Dau Kafyan Singh Bhawan., Raipur(C.G.) 2! Execiitivc Rngineer, Piihtic Works Departmeat, Division. - Jashpur, Distt. Jasbpur (C.G.) 3. Sub Divisional offlcer, Sub Dlvision - Patthalgaon, Piibtic Works Department, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITIOB UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE COIISTITUTIOM OF IKDIA Apoearaace: Shri Vinod Tckain, cdunsel for thc petitioners. Shri Sumit Verma, Panel taywcr for the State/ respondents. ORAL ORDER (19.12.2007} SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard. LearafA counsel for fhe petitioTiers submits that a pennanent Gang-man is to be retired at the age of 62 yenis in accordance with the Chhaltisga.rh Shaskiya. Sevak (Adhwarskiki- Ayii) Adhiniyam. 1967 read with Fiiiidamental Riiles, 56. He a1so WP(S) TSfo. 7521/2007 subinits tliat the point raissed has been decided t>y this CAiirt in batch ofinatters i.e. W.P.No. 108/2005 aTld inany ofher connected matters on 04.01.2007, reported in 2007 f5»C.G.L.J. 39 (CSwihud & athers Vs. State of C.G.f and fhis inatter is sqiiaiely c^>vered by that decision, which may be disposed ofon the saine terms, I^eamed coiinsel for t1ic State fairly agrees that this inatter is covered by tlie said decision. However, he submits that in some inatters the State has filed writ appeals. Unless soine interiin order is passed, merely on account of filing of the writ appeal, hearing of this writ petition cannot he kept u-i abeyance, when the inatter is squardy covei-Rd l>y the said judgment. In the resiilt, this petition is allowed. 1t ia disposed of in tenns of the order dated 04.1.2007 passed in W.P. No.108/2005 and other connected matters. No order as to costs. —n—— —— Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge vatti