IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.471 of 2009 PROF.DR.KEDAR PRASAD SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4. 03.11.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. This matter was passed over in the pre lunch session at the request of Shri P.N.Shahi, Advocate for the University to take instruction whether necessary payment has been made to the petitioner or not. The show cause on behalf o the opposite party no. 1, the State of Bihar, states at paragraph 6 that necessary funds had been sanctioned for payment to the Lalit Narayan Mithila University. Counsel for the University submits that he has taken instruction from the Law Officer of the University during lunch recesses and has instruction to submit that a sum of Rs. 11,17,653/- has been paid to the petitioner by way of a cheque dated 29.6.2009. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no further instruction from his client at this stage. This Court finds no reason to disbelieve the statement being made on behalf of the University at this stage. The proceeding stands disposed as infructuous. If the petitioner has any grievance with regard to the quantum of payment he may represent which is expected to be considered and disposed off expeditiously. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)