IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER M/s Hind Furniture Industries vs.State of Rajasthan &Ors. (S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 3614/2006) Date of judgment:- 29.10.2007 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA Mr.Nitin Trivedi, for the petitioner. BY THE COURT:- In this writ petition the petitioner has assailed validity of a communication dated 29th July, 2005, whereby in response to petitioner's letter dated 25.07.2005 the District Industries Officer, Bhilwara has inter alia informed that after cancellation of the lease deed of the 8 biswa land comprising khasra no. 446 situated at Gulabpura existing in favour of petitioner, the land stands alloted to other unit. The petitioner has sought direction for cancellation of allotment of the land in dispute in favour of other unit and to restore its original position in favour of the petitioner. The brief facts as set out in the writ petition are that the petitioner firm applied for loan to Rajasthan Financial Corporation (in short 'RFC' hereinafter) for the purposes of establishing an industrial unit. A loan of Rs. 1,90,000/- was sanctioned by the RFC in favour of the petitioner. The proceedings under Section 29 of State Financial Corporation Act were initiated against the petitioner for recovery of the amount outstanding and the assets of the petitioner industrial unit were sold by the RFC by way of auction. It is contended by the petitioner that the auction of the asset of the petitioner made by RFC does not include 8 biswas land comprising khasra no. 446. No document has been placed on record to show that the assets of the petitioner unit auctioned by the RFC does not include the disputed land. There is no averment in the petition as to when and why the lease deed of the disputed land said to have been executed in favour of the petitioner was cancelled. Neither the order of allotment made in favour of the petitioner nor the order of cancellation of allotment/lease deed has been placed on record. It is not even the case of the petitioner that he made the efforts to obtain the copy of order of cancellation of allotment and the same was not supplied to him by the authority concerned. Moreover, in absence of the order of cancellation of allotment, it is not possible to ascertain the reasons for cancellation. In this view of matter, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition. Accordingly, it is hereby dismissed. However, the dismissal of the the writ petition shall not preclude the petitioner from availing any other appropriate remedy available to him under the law. No order as to cost. (SANGEET LODHA),J.