IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE: B.SESHASAYANA REDDY CRLPMP.NO:3486 of 2011 IN CRLP.NO:2881 of 2011 Between: 1. Mudavath Jeeva Naik S/o Jayaramnaik 2. Mudavath Lakshma Naik @ Potta Naik S/o La Singh @ Debanaik Petitioners/A-3 & 4 (Petitioners in Crl.P No.2881 of 2011 on the file of High Court) AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad Respondent/Complainant (Respondents in-do-) Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in Crl.P, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners to submit bail bonds before the Court of the JFCM Macherla by correcting the mistake made in last but one para stating that the petitioners are directed to surrender themselves before the SHO, Nagarjunasagar PS, with in a week and on such surrender they shall be released on bail on their executing personal bond for a sum of Rs. 5,000/- with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the same SHO, Nagarjunasagar P.S. The petition coming on for hearing upon perusing the petition and the grounds filed in Crl.P., and the order of the High Court dated: 7-4-2011 made in Crl.P.No. 2881 of 2011, and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Challa Srinivasa Reddy, Advocate for the petitioners and of the Public Prosecutor, for the Respondent, the Court made the following; ORDER: “This is an application filed by the petitioner seeking certain corrections in the order dated: 07-04-2011. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners approached this Court for grant of regular bail. But, in the order it is inadvertently types as anticipatory bail and hence he sought for necessary corrections in the order. In that view of the matter, the word ‘anticipatory bail’ mentioned in the order in page No.1 in unnumbered paragraph No.5 is to be read as ‘regular bail’. The operative portion of the order to be substituted with the following order: Accordingly, criminal petition is partly allowed. Petitioner No.2-Mudavath Jeeva Naik and Petitioner No.3-Mudavath Lakshma Naik @ Potta Naik shall be released on bail on each of them executing a personal bond for Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Macherla and on further condition that they shall appear before the Station House Officer, Nagarjunasagar Police Station, once in a week, i.e. on every Saturday between 10.00 A.M. and 5.00 P.M., for a period of four weeks or till filing of the charge-sheet, whichever is earlier. Criminal Petition with regard to petitioner No.1- Ramavath Tara Singh Naik @ Chikka is dismissed.” Sd/- CH.RAJYA LAKSHMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1. The XIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Narasaraopet, Guntur District 2. The Junior Civil Judge, Macherla, Guntur District 3. The Station House officer, Nagarjunasagar Police Station, Guntur District 4. The Superintendent, Sub Jail, Gurazala, Guntur District 5. Two CC’s to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT) 6. One CC to Sri Challa Srinivasa Reddy, Advocate (OPUC) 7. One spare copy NOTE: Order dated: 7-4-2011 in Crl.P.No. 2881 of 2011 is corrected as per the order of the Court dated: 11-4-2011 made in Crl.M.P.No. 3486 of 2011. Substitute this amended order in place of the previous order which was already dispatched on 08-04-2011.” Sd/- S.SUSEELA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR HIGH COURT BSSRJ DATE: 7-4-2011 11-4-2011 AMENDED ORDER CRL.P. NO. 2881 OF 2011 BAIL