IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33064 of 2010 BABAN YADAV S/O BABAN YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 02.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 121 A, 122,414,120 B/34 of the I.P.C., Sections 4/5/6 of the Explosive Substance Act and Section 17 of C.L.A. Act. The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 22.4.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No. 12882/2010 but renewed his prayer for bail on the ground that other co-accused had granted bail and the petitioner is in custody since 3.7.2009 having no criminal antecedents. Considering the nature of allegation against the petitioner and the period of custody, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail after framing of charge, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Nalanda at bihar Sharif in connection with Deepnagar P.S. Case No. 130/2009, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. It is made clear that the petitioners case shall not bifurcate for framing of charge. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )