1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 758 OF 2001 Union Bank of India, Jalgaon Versus Gokul S/o Namdeo Choudhari and another. 1. Curt notice was served upon the Applicant Union Bank of India, however, no participation. 2. Mr. Rane appears for Gokul S/o Namdeo Chaudhari, who has been discharged by the learned Judge. It was alleged, that C.D.Sohoni, Accountant, Incharge of the Bank, in conspiracy with Gokul Namdeo Choudhari, by preparing false record, withdrew Rs.2 Lakhs from different 790 accounts. The matter, so far as Chintamani Dattatraya Sohoni is concerned, was tried before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalgaon and by judgment dated 15th January, 2003 the said Chintamani is acquitted for an offence under section 468, 677-A and 409 of Indian Penal Code. 3. The order under challenge, of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, display that the documentary evidence was considered in that trial and the learned Judge found that the role attributed to the 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. accused No.1 of keeping the voucher in the name of Rajesh Enterprises duly prepared but without signature. The entry into the account of Rajesh Enterprises carries no meaning. The observation of the learned Judge, in discharging accused No.1, is in tune with the record. Hence, no interference. Criminal application NO.758 of 2001 is dismissed. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:20/07/2009. ans/758