IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18776 of 2009 1) Santosh Kumar, 2) Moti Yadav, both sons of Saryug Yadav, village and P.S. Hathidah, district Patna - petitioners. Vs. 1. The State of Bihar, 2. Sri Bihari Sada, son of Sahdeo Sada, village Gurudeo Punarwasa, PS Salkhua, district Saharsa – opp. parties. 2 5.1.2010 This application is restricted inasmuch it only challenges the orders, dated 15.12.2008 and 27.2.2009 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate and the Sessions Judge, Jamui by which the petitioners have been directed to produce local sureties for release of their truck bearing registration no. JH-11-A-1305. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners belong to Mokama within the district of Patna and they have no connection in Jamui where the seizure has been made and, therefore, submits that they are ready to provide sureties from Mokama. By a supplementary affidavit the petitioners have disclosed the names of two truck owners, namely, Bipin Kumar Yadav and Dabbu Kumar. Both of them are ready to act as sureties for the petitioners as they are owners of a truck. I, therefore, direct that the court below should satisfy itself that the two sureties actually own the truck as mentioned in paragraph no.3 of the supplementary affidavit and after being so satisfied may release the truck aforesaid in favour of the petitioners after accepting the sureties given by the aforesaid two named persons. The petitioners will file an affidavit in the court below enclosing a 2 copy of the supplementary affidavit filed before this court. The matter should be disposed of within a period of two months from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order. This application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions. Counsel for the petitioners may deposit the cost of Fax for communicating this order to the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in Sikandra PS Case No. 172 of 2008. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)