IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3917 OF 2009 M/s.Arpit Builders & Developers ..... ..... ...Petitioner V/s Kanhaiyalal N. Joshi & Ors. ..... ..... .Respondents. Mr.Sandesh Patil, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr.Owen Menezes i/by Mr.R.S.Tripathi, Adv. for the Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4. Mr.Rahul P. Walvekar, for R.No.10, for self & POA holder of R.Nos.7 to 9 and 11 to 27. None for respondent No.6. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 11th November, 2009. PC: Learned advocates appearing for the petitioner and respondents have placed on record consent terms which goes to amicably settle the dispute and resolve the controversy. The dispute is settled on payment of consideration of RS.25 lacs and some other consideration in different form paid by the respondents to the petitioner. The amount has been received under demand draft the receipt of which is acknowledged in the consent terms. The parties to the writ petition are present in Court and they confirm the contents of said consent terms to be true and correct. Consent terms have been duly signed by both the parties and their respective advocates. Consent terms are taken on record and marked `X’ for identification. Both the learned counsel appearing for respective parties make joint request for disposal of writ petition in consent terms. Hence writ petition stands disposed of in consent terms. The undertakings given by the parties in the consent terms are accepted. C.C. Expedited. 11.11.2009.