IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1079 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1079 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1079 OF 2006 IN IN IN APPEAL NO.1074 OF 1997 APPEAL NO.1074 OF 1997 APPEAL NO.1074 OF 1997 FROM FROM FROM NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1794 OF 1995 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1794 OF 1995 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1794 OF 1995 IN IN IN SUIT NO.2227 OF 1995 SUIT NO.2227 OF 1995 SUIT NO.2227 OF 1995 Chetna Zarda Company .. Appellants V/s Britania Industries Ltd. .. Respondents Mr.U.J. Makhija i/by Ms.Preeti Shah for Appellants. Ms.Dipti Raja i/by Dhru & Co. for the Respondents. CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATE : 05.05.2006. DATE : 05.05.2006. DATE : 05.05.2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. On 27th March, 2006 none had appeard and therefore Appeal was dismissed in default. Now it has come to our notice that one of us (S.J.Vazifdar, J.) would not have preferred to hear the Appeal. In view thereof, the order of dismissal of Appeal stands recalled. Automatically the interim relief dated 17th November, 1997 continues. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR, J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR, J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR, J.)