IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.16046 of 2010 Date of Decision : September 08, 2010. Tarsem Singh and another .....Petitioners versus Managing Director, Punjab State Warehousing Corporation and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Sandeep Arora, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners are working as Class-IV employees in the respondent-Corporation from last more than 15 years. They seek a mandamus to direct the respondents to regularize their services in terms of the Government Policy dated 15.12.2006 (Annexure P-1) which has been given effect qua other employees vide order dated 22/23.11.2007 (Annexure P-8). In this regard, the petitioners are said to have served the respondents with legal notices dated 12.11.2009 and 26.10.2009 (Annexures P-6 & P-7 respectively), but it is alleged that their claim for regularization of services is not being considered for discriminatory reasons. C.W.P.No .16046 of 2010 2 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, as also the parameters laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Secretary, State of Karnataka and others versus Uma Devi and others, 2006 (4) SCC 1, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent No.1 to take an appropriate decision on the pending claim of the petitioners by passing a speaking order, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. September 08, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE