IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 4076 of 2008. Decided on: 21.06.2010. _________________________________________________________ Jeet Ram. … Petitioner. Versus H.P.S.E.B. and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Ms. Anjula Khajuria, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Petitioner has retired on 31st December, 1994. Case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that he has not been paid the retiral benefits. Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition may be directed to be treated as representation by the Secretary of the respondent-Board. 2. Consequently, the present petition is ordered to be treated as representation by the Secretary of the respondent-Board with a direction to dispose of the same within a period of six weeks after the receipt of the certified copy of the judgment. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. June 21, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?