1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 137/2010 Nitin Sitaram Wankhede ...Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent. Mr. Jaydeep Chatterjee, Advocate for applicant. Mr. T.S. Lodhe, A.P.P. for State CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. Date : 6th September, 2010. ORAL JUDGMENT 1. This revision application is filed against the judgment and order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-5, Aurangabad in Criminal Appeal no. 197/2008. 2 The facts leading to this litigation in short can be narrated as under. On 03/03/2002 at 4.30 p. m. the applicant was riding his motor cycle on public road between Aurangabad and Maliwada. The complainant’s sister by name Ashabai aged 48 years was trying to cross the road but the applicant knocked her down due to alleged rash and negligent driving and thereby caused simple injuries to her. Immediately after the incident, the victim was shifted to a hospital and a complaint was lodged against the applicant. The applicant was 2 soon arrested. Both the Courts below held that the applicant had driven the motor cycle on a public road in a manner so rash as to endanger human life and caused injuries to the victim. Having gone through the judgments, I find no illegality in this finding. For the offence punishable under Section 279 and 338 of Indian Penal Code the ld. Magistrate awarded substantive sentences of three months and to pay fine with default clause. 3 The learned judge of the appellate Court noticed that the victim sustained simple injury and so he altered the conviction of the applicant under Section 338 to 337 of Indian Penal Code. The learned Judge of the appellate Court then awarded sentence of only fine to the applicant for an offence punishable under Section 337 of Indian Penal Code. 4 The applicant thus faces a substantive sentence of three months for an offence punishable under Section 279 of Indian Penal Code. The learned Advocate appearing for the applicant inter alia contended that the substantive sentence awarded to the applicant is rather harsh and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the substantive sentence could be reduced, to a period which the applicant underwent in custody. I am told that after the decision of appeal on 05/05/2010, the appellant was in custody for a period of five days. 3 5 The incident took place long back in 2002. The applicant is facing this criminal case for last more than eight years. The injuries sustained by the victim were not serious in nature although she had sustained one injury on her head. Having regard to the applicant’s age, nature of injury, I am of the view that the substantive sentence awarded to the applicant for an offence punishable under Section 279 of Indian Penal code, can be reduced to the sentence he has already undergone. ORDER a) Criminal application is partly allowed. (b) The conviction of the applicant under Sections 279 and 337 of Indian Penal Code is confirmed. But the substantive sentence awarded to the applicant for the offence punishable under Section 279 of Indian Penal Code is reduced to the period of sentence he has already undergone. (A.V. NIRGUDE, J) ts k/ok 4