IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1836 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 1836 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 1836 OF 2007 M/s. Saralchem Idustries Pvt.Ltd & ors.....Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & anr. ........Respondents. Mr. Mordikar i/b Kihore N. Bhatia for the Petitioner. Ms. Alpa Zaveri APP for Respondent no.1. Mr. A.H.H.Ponda for the respondent no.2. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DTAED: 13TH MARCH, 2008 DTAED: 13TH MARCH, 2008 DTAED: 13TH MARCH, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Taken up for final hearing by consent of parties. 2. The original accused, who are present petitioners, in a complaint filed under section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act have taken exception to an order of process passed by the trial Judge so also the order passed by the revisional court rejecting the revision application filed by the petitioners. The learned counsel for the petitioners has contended that having regard to the averments made in the complaint, there is no justification for impleading petitioner nos. 2, 4 and 5 as accused in the complaint under section 138 of N.I.Act. Mr. Ponda the learned counsel for the respondent in all fairness concedes that the respondent would delete the petitioner nos. 2,4 and 5 from the array of accused. In view of this concession made the names of accused nos. 2, 4 and 5 are directed to be deleted in the complaint bearing no. 8354/04, newly numbered as 3732/SS/05. Rule made absolute in the above terms. .....