IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION No. 19566 of 2005 Between: Dadisetti Durga ..... PETITIONER AND The Sub Inspector of Police, Bikkavolu, Bikkavolu Mandal, E.G.district and another .....RESPONDENTS ORDER: Seeking a Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in seizing the petitioner’s house bearing Door No.5-16/1, besides Kalyanachakravarthi Rice Mill, Bikkavolu, Bikkavolu Mandal, East Godavari District as illegal and arbitrary, the present writ petition is filed. Heard the learned counsel on either side. The impugned seizure order copy is not filed. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in spite of the petitioner made an application to the respondents requesting to furnish certified copies of complaint alleged to have been made against her, inquiry and seizure report, they have not issued those certified copies. Without going into the impugned order, the writ petition cannot be entertained. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, without going into the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition, with a direction to the 2nd respondent to furnish copies of complaint alleged to have been made against the petitioner, and inquiry report and seizure order to the petitioner, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________ K.C. BHANU,J Dated: 05.09.2005 Dsr Note: Issue CC by tomorrow B/o Dsr