% IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ; BILASPUR Petitioner Vcrsus Respondents 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. W,P,(C)No, 865 pf 2009 Nihar Ranjan Kar, S/o Late Durga Mohau Kar, ayed about 48 years, R/o GTITU Nanak Chowk, Jagdapur, District Bastar (C.G.) State of Chhattmgarh, fhrough Secretaiy, Nagriya F>rashasan, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distdct Raipur (CG) Miuucipal Corporation, J^dalpur, through : Chief Municipal Officer, Bastar Dwision, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (CG) Chief Municipal OfBcer, Muiucipal Corporation, jagdalpitr, District Basfar (CG) CoUector, J^dalpur, District Bastar {CG) Nazul OfScer, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (CG) Tahsildar, Jagdalpur, Distaact Bastar (CQ) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF IND1A (SB: Hon'ble Sbri Satish K. AgnihotriJ.) Shri Manoj Paranjpc, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arviud Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the respondente No. 1 & 4 to6. 1. 4. Tbatoa O R. D E R (Passed ou tfais 10t11 Day ofFebruaiy, 2009) Leamed counsel appearing for the pctituiner submite fhat fhe petitioner is owner of fhe disputed superstructure. Petitioner has been fhreatened that fhe superstructure on hls house way be deinoUshed. Leanied counsel subinits fhat thcre is an oral direction. Per contra, SIui Dubey, leamed Panel Lawyer appearing for fhe respondents/State subxnits that there is no ordcr to deinolish the structure and this petition is p.t'ematttre as on the basis of ois^. stateinent no case can be inade out. Be that as it may, if the Miuiicipal Corporation proposes to denioUsh aay house or superstructure iu possessioa of the petitioner, fhe same inay be done after foUowing fhe due pracess of law aad passing a proper order. In view ofthe foregomg, this petition staads disposed o£No order asto costs. Sd/- • Satish K. Agnihotri Judge |