1S'<- ^ff-.^ IN THE^HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF C.G. AT BILASPUR CR.M.P. N0. ^j I Y^ OF 2010 ?:°Si ... APPLICANT "^^ . '^'^^ '^f^S^ l^VERSUS %<y* NON-APPLICANT Vijay Chopda, S/o Late Anraj Jain, aged about 42 years, R/o Mahasamund, Tahsit SE District- Mahasamund (C.G.) F'rakashchand Chopda, S/o Late Anraj Jain, aged about 62 years, R/o 18 Recreation Road, Choubey Colony, Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.) APPMCATION UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAI, PROCEDURE 1973 sisisssywsssw^siss HICKH OOUICT OF CHHATTI8GARH ATBIUUKPim SB : HOirBLB MR. JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKBR CRJB.P. N0. 418/2010 PB'nTIOKBR RE8POMDBWT8 ycrsus Vijay Chopda Prakashchaad Chopda Sttri Prateek Shanna, counsel for fbc petitioncr. VWnTtOV UNDBR SBCriON 482 OF TttK CR.P.C. ORDER (12.07.2010) Heard on admission. The present petition is directed against the impugDed order dated 15.4.2010 passed by tbe Additional Sessions Judgt Mahasamiiad ui Cr.Rev. No. 20/2010 whereby affirming (he otd.er passed by fhe Judkiial Magistrate First Class, Mahasamund dated 2.1.2010, lcaraed revisioaal Court bas distmsscd fhe revision as fited by fhe petitioner. From fhe order of the Magisteate, it is clear fhat fhe complaint was filed after an iaonlinate deiay and thc Magistrate has found fhe reasoas for condoiiatioa of deiay taadequate and fhereafter has disinissed thc coiapkuat itself. The reviskaial Court wide its detaBed order has considered allthe aspecte offhe case and has come to the conclusion fhat sufficient cause was not assigaed by the appUcant in filing fhe coanplaiat afier an inordmate delay and thereforc fhe said delay caanot be coiidonjed. I have perused the record. I fimd no reason to interfere witb the order iinpugned. Tbe petition has no substaace aad the saine is accordiagly disxuissed at the motkin aiaye itsetf. Sd/- pritinker Diwaker Judge