IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 3519 OF 1986 Vireshwar Saran Garg ... Plaintiffs. Vs. Shakuntala Ramkrishna Shriya & Ors. ... Defendants. Milind Vasudeo alongwith S.J.Khera for the Plaintiff. M.S. Rane i/b. Purnand & Co. for Defendant No. 1-B to 1-G. Devendra Udni for defendant No. 2. Defendant No. 2 is also present in person. Coram : S.K.Shah, J. Coram : S.K.Shah, J. Coram : S.K.Shah, J. Date : July 8, 2005. Date : July 8, 2005. Date : July 8, 2005. P.C. :- 1. The learned Counsel for the Plaintiffs submits that he be permitted to delete the name of Plaintiff No. 1, who is one of the Executors under the Will, which is probated, under which the Plaintiff NO.2 is the absolute owner of the Suit property. Permission granted. Necessary amendment shall be carried out during the course of the day. 2. The Plaintiff NO.2 and defendant NO. 2 have filed consent terms. Consent Terms are taken on record and marked ’X’ for identification. Defendant NO. 2 is present in person. He agrees to the consent terms. 3. The learned Counsel representing defendant NO. 1-B to 1-G states that none of these defendants have any right, title or interest in the suit property. In view of this statement, the learned Counsel for the Plaintiffs states that the plaintiffs do not press the suit as against the defendant Nos. 1-B to 1-G and withdraws the Suit against them. 4. The decree be passed in terms of the consent terms. 5. No Orders as to costs. 6. Suit stands disposed of accordingly. .... [S.K.Shah , J.] [S.K.Shah , J.] [S.K.Shah , J.]