IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 7829 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 08, 2010 Jai Bhagwan Gupta. …Petitioner Versus Arun Kumar Arora … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Atul Kaushik, Advocate, as Amicus Curiae, for the petitioner. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Mr. Atul Kaushik, Advocate, appointed as Amicus Curiae, on the instructions of the petitioner, who is present in person, seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file revision petition challenging the orders passed by the learned Rent Controller, as well as, the learned Appellate Authority. Mr. Kaushik states that since present petition was filed in person and petitioner could not get any legal advice, C.R. No. 7829 of 2009 hence instead of filing of revision petition, this petition was wrongly filed. Mr. Kaushik further states that time consumed in the present petition is liable to be condoned under Section 5 read with Section 14 of the Limitation Act in the revision petition which is to be filed by the petitioner. Present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file revision petition challenging the orders passed by the learned Rent Controller, as well as, learned Appellate Authority. October 08, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2