CRM No. 47981-M of 2007 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM No. 47981-M of 2007 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.8.2009 Nirmala Devi and others ...Petitioners Versus Smt. Meena and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Y.P. Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Rajwinder Kaur, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, AAG, Haryana for respondent No.2. Rajan Gupta, J. The only prayer in this petition is for quashing of the complaint on the basis of compromise dated 10th August, 2004, Annexure P-5. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, the proceedings in the complaint case cannot continue. According to the counsel, the affidavit was duly executed by respondent No.1. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 has, however, submitted that no compromise was arrived at between the parties and signatures of the complainant were obtained by the police on blank papers. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and given CRM No. 47981-M of 2007 2 careful thought to the facts of the case. In view of the fact that factum of compromise is denied by the complainant-respondent No.1, prayer for quashing on the basis of the same is misconceived. It is not possible for this court to enforce an alleged compromise between the parties. Even otherwise, all the pleas raised in this petition can only be subject matter of trial as the same can be decided only after evidence is led before the court below. There is no merit in this petition. Dismissed. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE August 11, 2009 'rajpal'