IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42819 of 2010 SHREEMATI ARTI SETH @ ARTI SETH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----- 02. 05.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. Transfer deed executed in informant’s favour was cancelled by a registered deed may not have been effective, but a Title Suit is filed for the same at informant son’s hand that is resolved now by filing a compromise. Abuse in caste name is said to be given at the house of the petitioner where informant had come, accordingly to the learned counsel for petitioner no offence under section 3(1)(X) of S.C./S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act is made out. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rosera, Samastipur in connection with Bibhutipur P.S. Case No.182 of 2008, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P. C. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)