IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 17TH MAY 2010 / 27TH VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 31834 of 2009(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. SUKUMARI, D/O.BHARATHI, SINU BHAVAN, THENGAMAN MURI, PALLICKAL VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 2. SINI DASS, AGED 25 YEARS, S/O.SIVADASAN, SINU BHAVAN, THENGAMAN MURI, PALLICKAL VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 3. SINU DASS, D/O.SUKUMARI, AGED 24 YEARS, SINU BHAVAN, THENGAMAN MURI, PALLICKAL VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.K.MADHUSOODHANAN NAIR RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, R D O OFFICE, ADOOR. 2. NARAYANA PILLAI PUSHPAKUMAR THIRUVATHIRA VEEDU, VAYALA MURI ERATTU VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK. ADVS. MR.P.SREEKUMAR FOR R2 MR.K.S.MANU (PUNUKKONNOOR) FOR R2 MR. K. RAMESH – GOVT. PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 31834 of 2009 PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS EXT.P1: COPY OF JUDGMENT DTD 11.11.2005 IN A.S. NO.83 OF 2003 OF THE ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE(ADHOC) FAST TRACK COURT II, PATHANAMTHITTA. EXT.P2: COPY OF PETITION DTD 7.7.2009 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE. S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.31834 OF 2009 ------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of MAY, 2010 J U D G M E N T In respect of certain properties, the petitioners and the second respondent embarked on a litigation which was decided in favour of the petitioner by the Civil Courts as evidenced by Ext.P1 judgment in A.S.No.83/2003. In the above circumstances, the first petitioner filed Ext.P2 petition before the first respondent for change of registry in accordance with the judgment and decree of the Civil Court. The petitioners' grievance in this writ petition is that Ext.P2 is not being considered and disposed of by the first respondent. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned counsel for the second respondent and the learned Government Pleader. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 as expeditiously as possible, at any W.P.(c)No.31834/09 2 rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioners as well as the second respondent. I make it clear that I have not considered the matter on merits and the first respondent has to decide the matter after considering the rival arguments of the petitioners as well as the second respondent. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE acd W.P.(c)No.31834/09 3