THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO C.R.P.Nos. 4619 & 4622 of 2010 COMMON ORDER: Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and at their request, the main revisions themselves are being taken up together for disposal. Since the parties are one and the same and the issue involved in these two revisions is common, both these revisions are being heard together and disposed of by this common order. Both these revisions are directed against the orders dated 03-09-2010 in I.A.Nos.1305 and 1304 of 2010 in O.S.No.31 of 2009, respectively, on the file of the III Senior Civil Judge City Civil Court, Secunderabad. The petitioner in both these revisions is the defendant in O.S.No.31 of 2009 who filed two applications; I.A.Nos.1304 of 2010 for reopening the evidence of plaintiff for further cross examination and 1305 of 2010 for further cross-examination of P.W.1 by recalling him. The trial Court, after considering the evidence adduced on record, did not find favour with the petitioner and accordingly dismissed both the applications mainly on the ground that no case has been made out by the petitioner and even no particulars were furnished by him as to on what aspect PW.1 is required to be further cross examined. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner approached this Court and filed the present Civil Revision Petitions. Having heard the learned counsel and perused the material available on record, it is seen that there is no valid reason in the affidavit filed by the petitioner to allow the applications. The Court below has rightly dismissed the applications. Hence, I do not see any reason warranting interference by this Court. Therefore, both the revisions are liable to be dismissed. In the result, both the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed. No costs. _________________________ JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO 28.04.2011 KVR