AB 1888/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE H. BARUAH Heard Mr. Inam Uddin, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K. Munir, learn ed Addl. P. P, who accepts notice on behalf of the State of Assam. This court after perusal of the available materials vide order dated 29-06-20-11 provided interim bail to the petitioner. It is submitted by Mr. Uddin, learned counsel for the petitioner that this case has been lodged on filing of a cross F IR by the informant. The allegation of snatching a gold chain weighing 11/2 bori is all false and fabricated, since nothing has been recovered from the possessi on of the petitioner by the police when he was immediately taken to the police o ut post. On this count and having gone through the materials available in the ca se diary, we also find that the informant (Md. Atabur Rahman) is not sure about the taking of the gold chain by the petitioner (Md. Abdul Kalam) herein. He in h is statement stated that he is not sure where the gold chain is lost. That apart , further materials also reveal that the informant did not receive any injury on his person on account of tussle between them. Taking note of the facts in its entirety, the interim provided vide order dated 29-06-2011 to the petitioner by this court is made absolute. Application stands disposed of.