IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.32357-M of 2010 Date of Decision:2.11.2010 Jagga Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.56 dated 15.5.2009 registered under Section 376 IPC at Police Station Sadar, Faridkot, District Faridkot. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that earlier an FIR No.203 dated 3.12.2008 ( Annexure P-1 ) was registered against one Pappu Singh and thereafter the second FIR against the present petitioner is apparently false. Moreover, the DNA report did not support the case of the prosecution. Heard. It is evident from the order dated 6.5.2009 passed by JMIC, Faridkot that the prosecutrix is a minor. After recording the statement of prosecutrix, the learned JMIC, Faridkot, prima facie came to the conclusion that concerned officials did not take action and record the statement of the prosecutrix correctly and intentionally registered the case against one Pappu, who is close relative of the complainant instead of the present Crl. M. No.32357-M of 2010 -2- petitioner Jagga Singh. A perusal of the DNA report shows that same does not appear to be conclusive. The matter needs to be investigated. The concession of anticipatory bail cannot be extended Dismissed. 2.11.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE