Dmt 1 nms 3024,3025,3026-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 3024 OF 2011 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 88 OF 2011 M/s. Colgate Palmolive (I) Ltd., .. Petitioners.. versus The Commissioner of Central Excise Mumbai I. – .. Respondent. ..... WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3025 OF 2011 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 86 OF 2011 Dmt 2 nms 3024,3025,3026-11 M/s. Colgate Palmolive (I) Ltd., .. Petitioners.. versus The Commissioner of Central Excise Mumbai I. – .. Respondent. ..... WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3026 OF 2011 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 87 OF 2011 M/s. Colgate Palmolive (I) Ltd., .. Petitioners.. versus The Commissioner of Central Excise Mumbai I. – .. Respondent. ..... Mr. Sushant Murthy i/by Mr. Madhur R. Boya for the Appellant. Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly with Mr. Jitendra B. Mishra for the Respondent. ...... Dmt 3 nms 3024,3025,3026-11 CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & A. A. SAYED, JJ. 16 November 2011. P.C. : There is a delay of one day in filing the appeal which is satisfactorily explained in the affidavits in support. The motions are accordingly made absolute by condoning the delay. (Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.) (A. A. Sayed, J.)