Singlea^ THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR Cr.M.P.No. 61^ /2011 PETITIONER ACCUSED ..^.'tl.f^ P.B.tto........^-^^ ^esented b!E Sha^.^^ ffeSKA...---^-t-it <« RESPONDENTS COMPLAINANTS Udhav Ram Sharma S/o Late Ram Ratan, aged about 66 years; R/o Mukti Para ward No.5, Near Baki Irrigation Water Tatik, P.S. Dehatnagar Ghairdhinagar, P.Sf^ Ambikapur, Distt Sarguja (C.G.) VER S U S :l.Harihar Vishwakarn-ia S/o Jagdeshwa Mishtri, aged about 65 years, Occupation Driver R/o ^Godhanpur, Ambikapur P.S. Dehat Ambikapur, Distt Sarguja (C.G.) 2. State of C.G. Through Sr.ation House Officer, P.S. Dehat Ambikapur, Distt Sarguja (C.G.) PETITION UNDER SECTION OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE siBSw^aEpfNi ^S^t ^R^ifl »^°b '<:. ^ w*iWl ghiiaeh 'ssf .-iwm*t, fs9\wi<c, hviwy. 0-.W-^-&\(/2^\ 1RR-"------"--74-" yi.200 SB^I'H^C ^GB^^ri^ SH^?T SB : Hon'ble Shri WIanindra Mohan SHrivastava, J. 19-09-20i11 ShriiSI'iaKti-Raj Sinha, counsel f0| SHn VaibhavGoverdhan, Panel I! ieBFqifep^-l *S*f^^TS^ ^ft^^. ^raSOTaS?! r the petitioner. .awyer for theState. 'Heardf'8"'"" This petition'under Section 48£ of the Cr.P.C. has been filed by the !-.;^-^"k ! petitioneraggrieved'by order dated 09-09-2011 passed by the 2"° Additional Sessibris'Judge.Surguj'a at Ambikapuri by which, bail has been granted to the petitioner and conditions have been imp<>sed. Learned counsel foflhe petitiorj -§6vernment servant and getting only ps.6,831/- as pehsion, and because of which, he is not in a position to collect ^ till 22-09-2011. He submits that impositi|3n ofsuch an onerous condition, virtually .^!& ambunts to denial of bail. Haying cqngidered the submis^ion made by learned counsel for the petitioner, taking .into consideration the ^mount of fine, which has been imposed Ithatthe petitioner is a retired government -X as also taking mto, consideration the fact .•^- it relates to directiQn for payment offine ?-2011 to deposit the amount of fin^ In view of the aforesaid considert Court, 1 am not inclined to issue notice tcj With the aforesaid observation, tt] ST submits that the petitioner is a retired uch a huge amount of fine of Rs.27,000/- servant-pensiQnej',-1; am not inclined to i^terferewith the impugned order so far as is concerned. However, in the interest of justice, the petitioner shall be granted arjother one-month time with effect from 22- . If the amount is not deposited ,within another period of one month, the bail gr^nted to the petitioner shall be liable to be "•-is cancelled. ition and limited interference made by this the respondents. e petition is finally disposed off. §d/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Juc^e