1 18.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.18 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1692 OF 2009 Kalim Ali Shaikh ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Ms.Anjali Awasthi for Applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste, A.P.P. for State. Mr.G.W.Mattos for Respondents 5 and 6. Mr.S.U.Kamdar, Sr.Advocate i/b Mr.J.G.Reddy for Respondent No.7. Mr.V.A.Thorat, Sr.Advocate with Mr.R.P.Ojha for Applicant in Appln. 260/2009. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED:- FEBRUARY 7, 2011. P.C. 1. This Application has been filed on the assertion that the Court on 3rd September, 2010 proceeded on the assumption that final report was submitted by the High Power Committee, when in fact, the report received by the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court was only an interim report. To this extent, we are in agreement with the grievance of the applicant. However, Counsel appearing for the High Power Committee has now invited our 2 18.11 attention to the final decision of the High Power Committee dated 5th February, 2011. Counsel for the applicant has questioned the correctness of this decision. However, that is a matter which will have to be agitated in appropriate proceedings and cannot be inquired into in a disposed of Writ Petition, that too, by way of present application. 2. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with liberty to the applicant to pursue such other remedy as may be permissible in law against the decision of the High Power Committee, which we have no manner of doubt, will be decided on its own merits in accordance with law. All questions raised in this application are left open. 3. Application disposed of accordingly. (A.R.JOSHI, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)