In the Honble High Court of Chhatishgarh at Bilaspur (C.G.) W.P.No........^^^......2006 SINGLE Petitioner 'su ..•• .<•' ^.' Tilakram Jaiswal aged 45 years ..••* Son of Shri Jhagguram Jaiswal, ^>y ^^-••" ;><>'" Respondents. ^ Versus 1. The State Govemment of Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, Tribal & Welfare, Department, D.K.S.Bhavaa, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Principal. Government High School, Dangarh, Block Mohala, District Rajnandgaon. 3. Joint Director, Treasury & Accounts, Pagariya Building, Raipur (C.G.) Writ Petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India For the issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus certiorari, prohibition and for other suitable writ or writs, order or orders direction or directions V.- TV^t <-i i yi<i i'^< v—T 3<1^!*1 4sl* (yi(^d^a-) 3n^T^Tf^IR> iPff3n^Ts»it| ftq^^ ?^nwfff^T3n^?r 5.7.2006 Heard Shri R.S. Shrivastaval Miss Dipali Pandey, Panel advance copy. The main grievance raised that hwo advance grade incremen|t Sarswati Jaiswal who was wcfi respondent No.2. These two adv^nce the wife of petitioner on the groun(|l 'eachers' Training Certificate. amount from the wife of the petitioi]! was not payable to her, and the sa| 10-11-2004. Learned counsei for the pet was iiiegaiiy recovered from the therefore, respondents be directec) with 18% interest. Learned coun^e! has already made a representetioti and that is not being decided by the| Having heard learned counj any opinion on the merit of the cas^ writ petition, respondents are dir< petitioner wlthin a period of 3 monthl With the direction aforesaid, Parties are entitlsd for certifieU counsel for the petitioner. Lawyer for the Statefrespondents, on |by the petitioner in this writ petition is |s were granted to his wife late Smt. rking as Assistant Teacher under grade increments were granted to that she has acquired qualification of |lowever, respondents recovered that ^er on the ground that the said amount |d amount was aiready recovered up to +l<lfi-l41-l t||t|dl'ffts'<fl <R]ttfl< ^arf^iTan^T ftioner submitted that the said amount |dues from the wife of the petitioner, to refund an amount of Rs.48,246/- ^e! further submitted that the petitioner and copy of same is Annexure-P/3, Irespondents. i^el for the parties, without expressing and also on the maintainability ofthis jcted to decide representation of the i^ from today, in accordance with law. l|he petition stands disposedof. copy of this order. —— &< L.G. Bhadoo Judge «