: 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.17 OF 2010 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.11 OF 2009 Dr.Smita Ramesh Chogle ... Applicant V/s. Prakash Shamji Gelani & Anr. ... Respondents Applicant present in person None for Respondents CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: JANUARY 18, 2010 P.C.: 1. Applicant No.1 has expired. An application is made by applicant No.2 in the form of an affidavit rather than a civil application as required under the Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) Rules to delete the name of applicant No.1 from the array of the applicants. According to Applicant No.2 who has preferred this application the heirs of applicant No.1 are already on record as applicant Nos.2 and 3. 2. The application is not in proper format, as no civil application has been filed. However, since the applicant No.2 appears in person, I am accepting the application in the format of an affidavit. However, the office objection regarding payment of court fees must be complied with by the applicant No.2. : 2 : 3. The name of applicant No.1 shall be deleted from the array of parties, for the reasons mentioned in the affidavit, which is being treated as a civil application. The amendment be carried out within two weeks from today. 4. It is made clear that if the office objection with respect to the court fees is not removed within two weeks from today, the application will stand dismissed.