IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 25TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 3RD ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 26869 of 2009(C) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- AYSHA C.H. D/O. M.MOHAMMED ,AGED 23 YEARS PUTHIYAVALAPPIL, KOTTACHERRY ,KANHANGAD, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN SRI.PUSHPARAJAN KODOTH SRI.K.JAYESH MOHANKUMAR SMT.ANJU P.NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, MALABAR REGIONAL CO-OPERATIVE MILK PRODUCTS UNION LTD, KUNNAMANGALAM,KOZHIKODE 673 571. BY ADV. MR. B.S.KRISHNAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J ............................................... W.P(C) No. 26869 of 2009 ................................................. Dated this the 25th day of September, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is studying for B.Tech degree (Diary Science and Technology) in the college of Diary Science and Technology, Kerala Agricultural University, Mannuthy, Thrissur. The respondent has invited applications for appointment to the post of Technical Superintendent (Production) in their unit. Persons who are appearing for the qualifying degree this year is also eligible to apply, provided a certificate is produced from the principal of their college. According to the petitioner, the petitioner has submitted Ext.P2 application along with other documents. Written test is proposed to be conducted on 26.6.2009. However, the petitioner did not receive any call letter for the written examination. It is under the above circumstances the petitioner has approached this court seeking the following reliefs: “i) to declare that petitioner is eligible to participate in the selection process to the post of Technical Superintendents (Production) based on Ext.P1 notification; W.P(C) No. 26869 of 2009 -2- ii) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondent to permit the petitioner to sit for the written examination to the post of Technical Superintendent (Production) in the respondent unit to be held on 26.9.2009 based on Ext.P1 notification.” When the matter came up on 24.9.2009, the standing counsel for the respondents on instructions submitted before me that the petitioner has not filed a proper application and only submitted an unsigned resume and therefore there is no valid application before the respondent filed by the petitioner which is why the petitioner has not been issued with a call letter. In view of the said contention, I directed the counsel for the respondent to produce the application submitted by the petitioner. The same has been produced today. From the same, I find that it is only a resume and it is also not signed. That being so, there is no valid application submitted by the petitioner and therefore she cannot be considered for the post. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE rhs