HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.31274 of 2010 Date: 24th December 2010 Between : Sindhe Nago Rao. …….Petitioner And The Director General of Police, Government of Andhra Pradesh & others. …..….Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.31274 of 2010 ORDER : Heard learned counsel for petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks directions by way of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents 1 to 4 in not investigating into Crime No.52 of 2010 pending on the file of Kuntala Police Station in Adilabad District, as illegal and arbitrary. Petitioner is a resident of Bhainsa town in Adilabad District. He has performed the marriage of his 2nd daughter with respondent No.5 on 23.11.2009. When his daughter died, the petitioner has lodged a complaint, suspecting as a case of homicide, alleging that respondents 5 to 7 are responsible. Based upon the complaint lodged by the petitioner, a crime is registered in Crime No.52 of 2010 for the offence under Section 304-B of I.P.C. on the file of P.S.Kuntala. In this writ petition, it is the grievance of the petitioner that inspite of registration of crime for the offence under Section 304-B of IPC, no investigation is made into the same and respondents 5 to 7 are also not arrested. Based on the written instructions, it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 4 that in this matter, pursuant to registration of crime, investigation is completed and LWs.1 to 11 were examined and their statements were recorded. It is also stated that there are no signs of unnatural death and a legal opinion is sought for from the Assistant Public Prosecuting Officer, with regard to filing of final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. Although it is alleged that no investigation is made, the written instructions placed before this Court shows that the investigation is completed in the matter. As it is stated that respondents are taking steps for filing final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C., if there are any objections to such final report, it is for the petitioner to putforth the same before the Magistrate concerned, after the final report is filed, but at this stage, it cannot be said that no investigation is made, as alleged by the petitioner. As much as the investigation is completed, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition, directing respondents 3 and 4 to file final report in the matter, within a period of four weeks from today, and it is open for the petitioner to file objections to the said final report, and if any such objections are filed, the Magistrate concerned may look into the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Subject to the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. __________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 24th December 2010 ajr