IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-41 of 2010 Date of Decision: February 10, 2010 Seema & Another .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & Others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Brijender Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for respondent Nos.1 to 3. None for respondent Nos.4 and 5. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) The petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with the contention that the petitioners got married. Respondent Nos.4 and 5 are not accepting the marriage, they being family members of petitioner No.2. Feeling threatened from the said respondents, the petitioners have filed this petition. Learned counsel for the respondent- State has pointed out that statement of the Crl. Misc. No. M-41 of 2010 [2] private respondents has been recorded and they have assured the authorities that no harm would be caused to the petitioners. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent-State, the petition is disposed of. (AJAI LAMBA) February 10, 2010 JUDGE Avin