IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.586 of 2011 Dr. Dilip choudhary, son of Late Umesh Choudhary, Resident of Mohalla Lalbagh, Police Station –Town, District-Darbhanga. …Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director General cum Inspector General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 4. The District Magistrate, Darbhanga. 5. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Darbhanga. 6. The City Superintendent of Police, Darbhanga. 7. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sadar, Darbhanga. 8. The Officer in charge, Town Police Station, Darbhanga. 9. Smt. Meena Choudhary, wife of Late Shiva Choudhary, Resident of Mohalla – Kotwali Chowk (Uma Cinema), Police Station –Town, District- Darbhanga. 10. Mr. Manish Choudhary, son of Late Shiva Choudhary, Resident of Mohalla-Kotwali Chowk (Uma Cinema), Police Station –Town, District- Darbhanga. 11. Mr. Gauri Shankar, son of Late Ram Chalittar Mandal, Resident of Mohalla-Bhagwandas, Police Station –Town, District-Darbhanga. 12. Mr. Prabhakar Kumar Choube, son of Late Devendra Narayan Chaturvedi, Reisdent of Mohalla-Kotwali Chowk, Naka No.5, Police Station-Laheriya Sarai, District-Darbhanga. 13. Mr. Anil Kumar Thakur, son of Mr. Pratap Narayan Thakur, Resident of Mohalla-Jainagar, Police Station – Jainagar, District-Madhubani at present residing at Mohalla-Kotwali Chowk, Police Station –Town, District-Darbhanga. ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Navendu Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Devendra Prasad Sinha, Sr. Advocate, A.A.G.-II. ________ 2 16.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the 2 petitioner submits that this petition has been filed by the petitioner for the protection of the life, liberty and property of the petitioner and the members of his family from the private respondents who are politically influential persons and they have grabbed the petitioners’ land with the help of police etc. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that on the representation of the petitioner the Inspector General of Police, Darbhanga has asked both the parties to appear before him today itself for sorting out the differences. 4. In the said circumstance learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition. According, this writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. PN (S.N. Hussain,J.)