IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER No. 859 OF 2006 Hind Seva Parishad & Ors. .. Appellants versus M/s.Vaibhav Developers .. Respondent ... Mr.S.K. Dubey for the appellants. Mr.N. Ghag for respondent. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 18th December 2006 DATED : 18th December 2006 DATED : 18th December 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. 2. Appeal is directed against the ad-interim order of injunction passed by the trial court. In view of the fact that the order is an ad-interim order and the motion is yet to be heard, I am not inclined to interfere in the order. 3. After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the appeal with liberty to move the trial court for expeditious hearing of the motion. Leave granted. Appeal dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as above. (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J)