1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.2602/2011 (Rupesh Suresh Salankar .vs. State of Mah. And others. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders Mr. P.B. Patil, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. S.J. Jichkar, AGP for Respondents 1 to 3. CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATED : JUNE 29, 2011 Heard. The learned AGP points out that impugned judgment of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal is dated 10.08.2009 and present writ petition has been filed on 18.03.2011. We have heard Advocate Shri Patil for the petitioner. We find that said judgment of Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal has been implemented on 23.10.2009 and accordingly the petitioner has been reinstated. Even after joining, the petition has not been filed immediately. Joining is not shown to be without prejudice to his right to challenge denial of back wages by Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. Other grievance made by Advocate Shri Patil is about not taking correct decision on grant of medical leave and continuation of service. We find that said grievance can be made by the petitioner to 2 Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. Hence with liberty to the petitioner to make grievance about wrong implementation of the operative part of the order i.e. (v) before Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal itself, writ petition is disposed of. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE halwai