THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CONTEMPT CASE No :1504 of 2009 DATED: 10-03-2010 Between: Gonuguntla Madhava Rao. ..... PETITIONER And M.Venkateswarlu & another. .....RESPONDENTS ORDER: This Court passed an interim order in W.P.No.21455 of 2009 on 08-10-2009 directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to distribute the essential commodities to the card holders. Now, this Contempt Case has been filed stating that the respondents have not permitted the petitioner to distribute the scheduled commodities to the card holders. 2. On instructions, the learned Government Pleader submitted that on 05-10-2009, i.e. even before the impugned order was passed by this Court, the authorization of the petitioner was suspended. 3. When once the authorization is suspended, in my considered view the question of permitting the petitioner to distribute the scheduled commodities to the card holders does not arise. As it was the contention of the petitioner that without passing appropriate orders, he was not permitted to distribute the scheduled commodities and this Court passed the said order, dated 08-10-2009, but now that it is clear that the authorization of the petitioner was suspended on 05-10-2009 itself, the order of this Court cannot be implemented and as such, it cannot be said that the respondents have violated the order of this Court. 4. Accordingly, Contempt Case is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA,J 10th March, 2010. Tsy