IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No.: 3710 of 2008. Decided on: 04.10.2010. __________________________________________________________ Harbans Singh. … Petitioner. Versus H.P. State Forest Corporation & another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Dushyant Dadwal, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. V.B. Verma, Advocate for respondent No.1. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the petitioner. The case of the petitioner could not be considered for promotion as the penalty of ‘Censure’ was imposed upon him. However, the petitioner be now considered for promotion since the impact of the penalty is over. The petitioner shall be considered for promotion from due date. 2. In view of the observations made hereinabove, the present petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. October 04, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?