1 cp280.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 280 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 709 OF 2010 [Namdeo Raghunath Bade vs. State of Mah. & Ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. K.C. Bade Patil, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. Manoj Shinde, Advocate holding for Mr. M.K. Goyanka, Advocate for R. 1 & 2. Mr. K.B. Choudhary, Advocate for R. 3. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 1ST AUGUST, 2011 PER COURT : Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel appearing for the respective respondents. 2. In pursuant to the notice issued in this contempt petition, Smt. Sudha w/o Shamsunder Kalsekar , working as Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Sub Regional 2 cp280.10 Office, Nashik filed affidavit in reply on behalf of respondent No.3 stating therein that, till application of the petitioner for pensionary benefits came to be finally decided, the petitioner attained the age of superannuation on 01-06-2010 and therefore, to avoid less benefit to the petitioner, superannuation pension has been started and maximum benefit has been given to the petitioner. 3. In the light of this affidavit in reply, contempt petition is disposed of. Notice stands discharged. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/AUG11