FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1602 OF 2011 ( Shri. Prakashchandra Rupchandbhai Mandore & Anr. Vs. Dhule Municipal Corp. Dhule ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. Shrikant S. Patil, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. A.S. Sawant, Advocate for respondent No. 3. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 7th March, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard Advocate Shri. Patil for petitioner, Advocate Shri. Sawant for respondent No. 3. 2. It is apparent that on 15.4.2006 the Trial Court allowed application as moved and added defendant Nos. 4 and 5 as defendants. Contention that added parties have status only as intervener and have no right to cross examine the petitioner/ plaintiff is therefore misconceived. There was and there is no challenge to order dated 15.4.2006. I therefore do not find anything wrong with the view take by Trial Court in permitting them to cross examine petitioner/plaintiff. Petition rejected. [ B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. ] ssc/wp1602,11