1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2656 OF 2009 IN CIVIL APPLICATION (St.)NO.2019 OF 2008 IN REVIEW APPLICATION (St.) NO.42302 OF 2000 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2473 OF 1998 Smt.Sangita Bhaskar Salve. ...Applicant. vs. 1.State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents. --- Mr.A.M.Joshi, for Applicant. Mr.C.R.Sonawane, AGP for Respondent nos.1 to 3. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & K.K.TATED, JJ. DATED: 21st November,2009 P.C.:- Heard. Civil application is granted in terms of prayer clause (c). (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (K.K.TATED, J.) 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION (St.)NO.2019 OF 2008 IN REVIEW APPLICATION (St.) NO.42302 OF 2000 Smt.Sangita Bhaskar Salve. ...Applicant. vs. 1.State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents. --- Mr.A.M.Joshi, for Applicant. Mr.C.R.Sonawane, AGP for Respondent nos.1 to 3. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & K.K.TATED, JJ. DATED: 21st November,2009 P.C.:- Heard. Civil application is granted in terms of prayer clause (b) & (c). (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (K.K.TATED, J.) 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW APPLICATION (St.) NO.42302 OF 2000 Smt.Sangita Bhaskar Salve. ...Applicant. vs. 1.State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents. --- Mr.A.M.Joshi, for Applicant. Mr.C.R.Sonawane, AGP for Respondent nos.1 to 3. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & K.K.TATED, JJ. DATED: 21st November,2009 P.C.:- Heard. By this review application the applicant seeks review of the order dated 5.10.2000. The reason for which the applicant seeks review of the order is the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of State of Maharashtra & ors. vs. Tukaram Tryambak Chaudhari & ors, 2007(2) Bom.C.R. 748 . Admittedly, the petition has been decided by the Division Bench by 4 order dated 5.10.2000 as per the law that was existed on that date. That subsequently the law is changed, cannot be the ground for review of that order. The review application, therefore, is rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (K.K.TATED, J.)