CR No.3798 of 2011 O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.3798 of 2011 O&M) Date of decision: 2.9.2011 Manohar Singh ......Petitioner(s) Versus Tilak Raj ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Harchand Singh Batth, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.R. Mahajan, Advocate for the respondent. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) This is tenant's revision petition challenging the orders dated 6.5.2009 and 2.5.2011 ordering his eviction and dismissing the appeal respectively on the ground of personal bona fide necessity of the respondent-landlord. At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits before this Court that he has instructions from his client that the petitioner is ready to hand over the vacant possession to the respondent-landlord if a period of one and a half year is granted to him to vacate the premises in question. Mr. B.R. Mahajan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-landlord has submitted that the respondent has no objection in granting the petitioner a reasonable time as considered by this Court to hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises subject to the tenant making the payment of the arrears of rent and the future rent and that the petitioner shall also file an undertaking in this regard. The aforesaid submissions made on behalf of the counsel for the respondent are acceptable to the learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits CR No.3798 of 2011 O&M) 2 that the next date of hearing before the Executing Court is on 17.10.2011 and the petitioner shall make the payment of arrears of rent, if any, on that date and the petitioner shall also file an undertaking before the said Court that he shall hand over vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent-landlord on or before 31.8.2012. Thus, on the basis of the aforesaid consensus reached, the revision petition is dismissed with the observations that the petitioner is granted one year's time to vacate the premises in question i.e. on or before 31.8.2012, subject to his furnishing an undertaking to this effect before the Executing Court on or before 17.10.2011 and also make the payment of arrears of rent on that date. The petitioner shall also keep on paying the future rent on 10th of every month in advance. In case of any violation of the aforesaid conditions, the eviction order shall come into force immediately. It is also clarified that in case the petitioner fails to hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent-landlord on expiry of one year period i.e. on or before 31.8.2012, the respondent shall be entitled to initiate the contempt proceedings against the petitioner, in addition to the execution of the eviction order. Disposed of. September 2, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE