IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM No. M- 29219 of 2009 (O/M) Date of Decision: 25.11.2009 Tek Chand ...petitioner Versus State of Haryana & Another ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Augustine George Masih. Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Y.P. Malik, AAG Haryana. Mr.Sandeep Panwar, Advocate for respondent No. 2/complainant. *** AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J.(Oral) Counsel for the petitioner contends that in compliance with the order passed on 20.10.2009, the petitioner has appeared before the trial court on 31.10.2009 and he has been admitted to interim bail. Counsel for the respondent-state does not dispute this fact however, he opposes the grant of bail to the petitioner. In view of the above order dated 20.10.2009 is confirmed. The petitioner is directed to be released on regular bail by the learned trial court to its satisfaction. Petition stands disposed of. November 25, 2009 (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) poonam-II JUDGE