IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2010 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 36915 of 2010(L) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- K.V.MOHANAN,KAROTHVALAPPIL HOUSE, VENGARA P.O.,KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES(GENERAL),KANNUR. 2. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPRATIVE SOCIETIES(GENERAL),KANNUR. 3. THE MADAI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.LL.251,VENGARA P.O.,KANNUR DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, -670 305. 4. THE BOARD OF DICRECTORS OF THE MADAI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, REP.BY ITS PRESIDENT, VENGARA P.O.,KANNUR DISTRICT -670 305. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. BASANT BALAJI. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/12/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO.36915 OF 2010 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of December, 2010 JUDGMENT The grievance of the petitioner, who is a member of the third respondent-society is with respect to the inaction on the part of respondents 1 and 2 to take further follow up action in terms of the report submitted pursuant to the enquiry conducted under Section 66(2) of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 (for short 'the Act'). For the aforesaid purpose, the petitioner has submitted Exts.P4 and P8 petitions before the first respondent. The said petitions are still pending. It is in the said circumstances that this Writ Petition has been filed. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader. In view of the order I propose to pass in this Writ Petition I do not think it necessary to issue notice to the respondents 2 and 4 at this stage. In view of the decisions of this Court reported in Thiruvalla East Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Joint Registrar (2009 (4) KLT 378) and in State of Kerala v. Aravindakshan Nair (2010(3) KLT 11), when an enquiry has been conducted in terms of Section 66(2) of the Act, W.P.(C) NO.36915/2010 2 the authorities competent are bound to pass further orders in terms of Section 66(5) of the Act. Therefore, the first respondent is bound to take further action based on Exts.P4 and P8 in view of the provisions under Section 66(5) of the Act. Hence, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to consider Exts.P4 and P8 and take appropriate action in terms of the provisions under Section 66(5) of the Act with notice to all the concerned parties expeditiously. (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) spc W.P.(C) NO.36915/2010 3 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. JUDGMENT September, 2010 W.P.(C) NO.36915/2010 4