1 Review-Petn-213 PGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Review Petition No.213 of 2010 IN Writ Petition No.5455 of 2010 Shelly Akhil Pandya .. .. Petitioner v/s. Akhil Vidyashankar Pandya .. Respondent Mr.R.S. Deshpande with Mr.V.S.S. Thakur for Petitioner. Mr.Sajan Oommen for Respondent. ----- CORAM : SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATED : 2nd February 2011 P.C. : 1.The Petitioner/wife has applied for review of my order dated 4th October 2010. The essential modification claimed by her in the Review Petition is that the consent given by her Advocate for giving the flat on licence was not given by herself and hence be revoked and she be entitled to stay in the flat which is flat No.F-8 in Gita Prakash Co-operative Housing Society, Andheri (West), Mumbai. 2.Though this Review Petition does not fall strictly within the parameters of Order XLVII of the Code of 2 Review-Petn-213 Civil Procedure, part modification can be made in the interest of justice. The husband desired to license the flat so that he could pay maintenance amount directed to be paid to the wife and the children. The maintenance amount is Rs.35,000/- per month. The husband has, in fact, not licensed the flat. The husband has, in fact, paid maintenance to his wife as directed. The husband may continue to do so pending the Petition in the Family Court. Consequently, the consent given by the Advocate for the wife on behalf of the wife is at present allowed to be withdrawn. However, the wife cannot be allowed to enter upon the said flat pending the petition. That order of modification cannot be granted in the Review Petition. 3.The Review Petition is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J.)