1 wp-1722.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1722 OF 2010 Jahangir S. Khambata. ... Petitioner. V/s. Union of India and others. ... Respondents. Manoj Sanklecha i/b. M/s.Federal & Rashmikant for the petitioner. Mrs.S.V.Bharucha for the respondents. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND R.M.SAVANT, JJ. DATED : 8th September 2010. P.C. : Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent- Revenue. Revenue has filed an affidavit duly affirmed by one Lokesh H.D. presently working as Assistant Director General of Foreign Trade, Mumbai. In the said affidavit, the statements made are as under: “8....... (a) The respondent No.3 has issued a corrigendum to the said adjudication order excluding the name of the petitioner in the footnote of the said 2 wp-1722.10 adjudication order dated 19.07.2010. Hereto annexed and marked as Exhibit-III is the said corrigendum dated 03.09.2010 already served on the Petitioner’s Attorney. (b) The respondent no.3 has already communicated to IEC section to update the changes in the Importer/Exporter profile in this office database by Excluding the name of the petitioner from the list of directors of the said company so that the petitioner is not put to inconvenience in near future.....” 2. Learned counsel appearing for the Revenue, based on the aforesaid portion of the affidavit and pleading incorporated therein, makes a statements that no action against the petitioner in future shall be initiated since the factum of his resignation right from 29th June, 1996. The statement made in this behalf and assurance given to this Court are accepted. In this view of the matter, there is no cause of action for the petitioner to proceed with the petition. Petition is, thus, dismissed for want of cause of action with no order as to costs. (R.M.SAVANT, J.) (V.C.DAGA J.)