ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1017 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.1017 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.1017 OF 2007 IN IN IN SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO. 562 OF 2007 APPEAL NO. 562 OF 2007 APPEAL NO. 562 OF 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.S.A.Sawant for the Applicants. Mr.S.B.Deshmukh for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 13th June, 2008 : 13th June, 2008 : 13th June, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. . After hearing both the parties, this Court by order dated 27th November, 2007 granted ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b). 2. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondents has filed affidavit in reply and basically contended that the parties be directed to maintain status-quo as per the Appellate Court’s ( 2 ) order. The learned counsel appearing for the Appellant makes statement that from the date of order of Appellate Court till today there is no further transfer of the property. In view of this, considering the submissions made by the parties, apart from the questions of law raised in the Second Appeal, at this stage of the proceedings, I am of the view that, parties to maintain status quo as of today and not to transfer the property by both the parties till the decision of the Second Appeal. 3. The Civil Application is disposed of, accordingly. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]