IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33499 of 2008 Manish Kumar, so n of Subodh Kumar Jha, Proprietor of M/s. Laxmi Lata Trading, Mirchaibari, Katihar, Mohalla Officers’ colony, PS and district Katihar – Petitioner. Vs. 1) The State of Bihar, 2) Dilip Jolly , son of Shri K.L. Jolly, Managing Director, M/s. Fena (P) Ltd., A-237, Okhla Industrial Area Phase I, New Delhi. 3) Bijay Kumar Jha, Regional Sales Manager, A-237, Okhla Industrial Area Phase I, New Delhi 4) Dayanand Singh, Senior Divisional Manager of A-237, Okhla Industrial Area Phase I, New Delhi. 5) Rajesh Dubey, Sales Officers of Fena (P) Ltd., A-237, Okhla Industrial Area Phase I, New Delhi 6) M/s. Fena Private Ltd. Head Office at A-237, Okhla Industrial Area Phase I, New Delhi – Opp. Parties. 2 12.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. This application has been filed for quashing the order, dated 27.9.2006 passed in Complaint Case CA Case No. 468/2005 passed by the C.J.M, Katihar by which cognizance has been taken under section 406 of the Penal Code although according to the petitioner offences under sections 409, 420, 467, 468 and 120B of the Penal Code are also made against the accused persons. The question as to whether offences would be made under the aforesaid sections of the Penal Code can be considered at an appropriate stage of the case and specifically at the stage of framing of charges. It would be open to the petitioner to raise this issue at the appropriate stage. This application is disposed of with the aforesaid observation. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)