IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20675 of 2011 Chintu Nut Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02/ 20.07.2011 Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner bringing test identification parade chart which is annexure3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. It would appear from perusal of the record that two Chintu Nut have been made accused in this case and first information report has been registered against Chintu Nut without giving any parentage and Rakesh Nut as well as some unknown persons. It appears that the petitioner was remanded in this case on 22.12.2009 and he was put on test identification parade on 28.1.2011. Admittedly, petitioner has been put on test identification parade after a long gap of his remand and furthermore, alleged occurrence had taken place on 22.12.2009. Apart from the aforesaid fact, it is also alleged that some ornaments were recovered from the house of the petitioner and admittedly, aforesaid ornaments have not been put on test identification parade. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Chintu Nut, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar, Motihari, East Champran in Paharpur P.S. Case no. 189/2009. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)