IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.57 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.01.2011 Harinder Kaur . . .Petitioner Versus Nymph Beauty Parlour & Boutique . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Rajesh Lamba, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against order passed by the Rent Controller, Faridabad dated 04.12.2010 by which provisional rent has been assessed to the tune of Rs.2000/- per month. The only grievance of the petitioner is that the rent claimed is Rs.5000/- per month which has been assessed to the tune of Rs.2000/- per month on the pleadings of the respondent. However, he had miserably failed to prove on record even before this Court also that the agreed rate of rent was Rs.5000/- per month with annual increase of 10%. In the absence of any cogent evidence much less prima facie, this court is of view that there is no error committed by the learned Rent Controller, Faridabad in assessing the rent to the tune of Rs.2000/- per month. Hence, present revision petition is devoid of any merit and as such the same is hereby dismissed. No costs. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) January 19, 2011 JUDGE vivek