IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR THURSDAY, THE 17TH JANUARY 2008 / 27TH POUSHA 1929 RSA.No. 541 of 2005(F) ---------------------- AS.161/2000 of III ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, TRIVANDRUM .................... APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT: ------------- G. SURENDRAN, PROPRIETOR, M/S. BALARAMAPURAM KAITHARI, POTHENCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR RESPONDENTS: APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF: ----------------- M/S. ARUNA FABRICS, CHALAI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, A.VELAYUDHAN PILLAI. BY ADV. SRI.M.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR SRI.R.V.ABHISHEK THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J. ........................................... R.S.A.No. 541 OF 2005 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 17th DAY OF JANUARY, 2008 JUDGMENT Learned counsel appearing for appellant submitted that as against the conviction confirmed by the appellate court in the criminal case initiated under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, a criminal revision was filed before this court and in that criminal revision, appellant and respondent have settled the dispute and as per the terms of settlement, appellant agreed to pay Rs.22,000/- as found by the appellate court in the criminal appeal filed by appellant to respondent and respondent agreed that he will be satisfied with that amount provided the amount is paid and respondent will not claim any further amount covered by the decree in the suit in addition to the amount to be paid pursuant to the judgment of criminal court in Crl.R.P. 820 of 2003. Learned counsel appearing for respondent also submitted that the settlement between the parties as submitted by the appellant is correct. Learned counsel on both sides submit that recording that submission, appeal may be dismissed. Appeal dismissed recording the submission. M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE lgk/-