: 1 : cam.107.2011 vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.107 OF 2011 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 117 OF 2011 Akshata Rajesh Masurkar .. Applicant V/s. Rajesh Sadashiv Masurkar .. Respondent Ms.Indrayani M. Koparkar for Applicant Ms.Jamila Khan I/b S.R. More for the Respondent CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR & R.Y. GANOO, JJ. DATED: AUGUST 9, 2011 P.C. 1. Counsel for the Applicant submits that the respondent has deposited the monthly maintainance. In that sense, nothing survives for consideration as regards prayer clause (a). So far as prayer clause (b) is concerned, considering the present assignment, coupled with the fact that older appeals than the present appeal are pending on the file, it is not possible to expedite the hearing of this appeal. The appeal shall be listed as per its turn under appropriate caption. 2. Civil application is disposed off accordingly. ( R.Y. GANOO, J.) (A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.) : 2 : cam.107.2011 vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 117 OF 2011 Akshata Rajesh Masurkar .. Applicant V/s. Rajesh Sadashiv Masurkar .. Respondent Ms.Indrayani M. Koparkar for Applicant Ms.Jamila Khan I/b S.R. More for the Respondent CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR & R.Y. GANOO, JJ. DATED: AUGUST 9, 2011 P.C.: Counsel for the parties submits that they would explore the possibility of settlement. For that limited purpose, the appeal be listed under the caption “Settlement” on 12.9.2011. ( R.Y. GANOO, J.) (A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.)