@ ^^ APPLICANTS IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) C^^ 1 C.R.NO. c?~cf| /031S.B.) iSNgl® l.RAMSEVAK S/0 DEENO MARAR, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS ^.TUKRAM S/0 DEENO MARAR, AGEI ABOUT 45 YEARS R/0 BOTH, VILLEAGE PRSADA (BADE), TAH. -SARANGARH, DISTT. RAIGARH y •-•'"C^'.!^'"' ^^yW' ^ ff.' NON-APPLICANTS VERSUS ^. l.DANMATI W/0 CHAMARA MARAR, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/0 KATELI TAH. - SARANGARH, DISTT. -RAIGARH (C.G.) (DIED) •'"2.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THR.6ua'H cc'^y^ 3-Sonsoi s./o NanKuyM6rqr1?(o ^t-eti; TA<- Saranflarh Dtsft. -^oiyinfi (<-.&• )jt,te^i^^^.fet^r^o»^^ REVISION U/S 115 OF C.P.C. READ WITH U/S 151 OF C.P.C. TOHC-22 ^"^ '^Tpn^pf; -s^Fre, fani'y'j.t |3I^?['qit fwvh sn^i ^t^i -Hf^^ HW»{gwi<*> ^^i/.°5_ te^?' 311^1 •gSIIWBte 16.12.2W3 Shri \^neet Panfley, Heard cai admisslon. The revision is directfed 21.07.2003 passed by thc Cav^l Misc. CivU Case No.1/2002, restored fhe suit, dismissed ic( Rs.300/-. Fnsm the perusal of th^ hearing of fhe sult was fixai oi|i plaintiffs could notAppear, as (|ea for settleinent ofmamage ofs^tp also bonie out fi-om llie plaintifl's was not well. The suit was dismissed at 11.25 arollcatton for restoratlon dutrf 28.03.2003. The Coiirt below fta costsofRs.300/-. Havtag considered the case and maberial on record, i4 Cosls caiinot be sald to be on below has taken veiy lexiient vietiy coimjsel for the applicaats. >fmamage ota^^caaat w, •=bl*tl<-l<fll 41Hyii'(i'fS<^ <r°l^l< •^ 3[p(p:i sn^i ae^dnst the (wder dated Judge Class B[, Sarangstrti ia jiFhereby the Coiut below has default, imposing the costs of record, it appears that the 22.03.2002. On that day, the dersons fead come to (heir hou^ No. 1 Ram Sawak. It is ixscdixl Uial tlui coLuiscl for Uie Cbiirt below has noted that the JA.M. The plamtffife filed tlie supported by (te afBdavit on V/acs restoped the sult subject to ftlcte and dcccimistanoes ot' Ctie the opulon of Chis Court, tlie Pgher side. 1n feict, fbe Ctourt •I ^r. TheTearetwopl£untiffs,c>ne XI-HC-22 •ysi -sqTqRTiT, ^Tll'y'ld, fa«l'ai< llP'R'IT^RIttl^•^^^•/•••••-M^ fg^r' sn^i'^i f<-ti?b sn^r ?hH' ^tli<Jl cbi'siffi^-i w^vii ^ fttA <r"i<<i< ^? SlPiIlI SD^I of fchem a>iild have attended the case. There is no ennr of jurisdiction ar iUegpUty wa^ranting interferenoe In the impugned order. The revision falls and is dismissed. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge