1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. LPA No. 375 of 2011. Decided on: 22.9.2011 Kumari Anjana ....Appellant Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the appellant : Mr. Rajiv Rai, Advocate. For the respondents/State: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Appellant is the private respondent in CWP No. 20 of 2011. Admittedly, she is a PTA teacher and the writ petitioner, the private respondent herein, is a regular teacher. According to the appellant, there are several vacant posts where the writ petitioner, private respondent herein, can work and if so, if a teacher is shifted, the writ petitioner can work in that vacancy. As rightly held by the learned Single Judge, the appellant has no enforceable right so as to continue as a PTA teacher. When a regular teacher joins a vacancy, then PTA teacher has to give way 2 to that teacher. However, learned Counsel for the appellant points out that there are several vacant posts in and around Kashmaila, Blardwara and Bhamla, where the private respondent is willing to go. If that be so, the appellant may point out such willingness before the Director and in case the Director is in a position to ascertain the willingness of the private respondent to work in any of the vacancies, as pointed out by the appellant, the private respondent may be shifted to that place and the appellant may be continued till the vacancy is filled up otherwise than by a regular teacher. 2. With these observations, the appeal is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. September 22, 2011 (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (sck/hl) Judge.