»y >• ^T"\ ..'^-'-1 >0.<"^^. ^ ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR Writ Petition J9o.lS 2-./ /2005 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS /ys^\ /^\"\\ ^y ^^,,," :,^/ '^1>— > Dr. \/lday Kizmar Jayaswal, S/o Sbri R. C. Jayaswaly Aged about 31 years, Presentiy workuig as Medical Ofi&cer at^Pnmary Health Center, Salka, District- Koria (C.G.). Versus - . : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through 8ecretar5rT Departoient of Health anU Education, Mantralaya, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). ^ 2. The Deau, Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial College,Raipur (C.G.). ^3. The Director, Medical Education (Directorate) near Maatrlaya, Raipur (C.G.). .^^. WRIT PBTITON UNDER ARTICLB 226/227 OF THB CONSTITUTIOIT OF ISDIA FOR I88UANCE OF SUITABLE WmT. ^^3CTE OR DIRECTION TO DO JUSTICE 1JS THE 3SIATTER. [ .^Lri'i(_^_.__- XI-HC-22 Ta^ ^l^M^, ^^^1?, (^<rtl^y< _.s^^^ HTO^Il ^)^1 IW f^)^ ^n^r^r R^i<=h^n^r ^^i^^rfer >3T^?T5^TraR:^rf^T 21-04-20Q5 Shri Prashaiit JayaswalJ Asgar, couusel for tlie petitione4 Shri Prainod Venna, Add[l. Parag Kotecha, Paiiel La\vyer 1^ 1, 2 aad 3. Heai'd, \ Learaed counsel for ttle seats of MS General Sxirgeiy w| petitioner opted for diplonia fhat had he been ui the waitiit been shown ia the waiting list Uiat subsequently the petitionei ou or about 14t11 March, 2005| petitioner is entitled for considj have been rcverted back, Leard( subniitted that tlie petitioner before fhe Du'ector, Medical Edi (Annexure-P/5), but fhe same Shri VGnna, learaed Addl. ifthe representation has been will be decided iii accoidaace On going fhrough the petitioner subniitted fhe repres Medical Education, Raipul: <=t)i<iTc<i<41rt Hi*4<nT^te:^'<F3i<^i< ^3Tf^T3T^T Sr, Advocate wifh Shri Ali . Advocate General wifli Shri »r the State/respondents No, betitiouer submitted th.at two ;re not disclosed as such tlie cfourse. He further submitted |.g Ust, his naaie would have t.t S,No, 11, He also submitted caoie to kaow ia th.is regard He also submitted tib.at the ^ration of fhose seats, which ^d counsel for fhe petitioner a detailed representation i^cation, Raipur on 14-3-2005 not been decided so far. Advocate General stated fhat r^ceived from the petitioner, it 7iPi law. l:ecord, it appears fhat tJie mtation before the Director, on 14-3-2005 and 33^ade h4is wifch (^^f^) XI-HC-22 T^^l^l^l^, ^Tfl^^Ko, (s«rtl^y 37T^T tR^ WH^Tl^)Hra) W^ 200 3:n^fT^T ^i<=h^!?T ^WTC^ ^l^ PNNl|y ?rt- Gowri '^ <*: ^TI^T 5^cTRTT ^f^cT acknowledgeiaent was also Anaexure-P/5. Having considered the case aad material on record, a direction is given to the representation which was eorV^ or if tlie petitioner files a fresh) his grievaaces wifhui two day^ aad decided as early as pos| 2005, by a reasoned order ia a|: clear fhat fhe decision taken the rcpresentatiou shaU be c<^i It is also niade clear that subsists fhe petitioner may fhe law isicludrag filing a petitic| With fhe aforesaid obst petitiou staads disposed of Consequenfly, M.(W.).P^ 2938/05 &. 2939/05 also staa^ Parties are entitled for obt^iaed, which is bome out froni <^NTcn<41vi ^i^cnTtfN^tif^^K ^3:rf^'R'3TI^T fects aad circunistaiices of fhe e|ids ofjustice will be sen^ed, if |;onipetent aiithority fhat the ?r subinitted by the petitioner |detailed representatiou raisnig the same shaU be cousidered ^ible preferably by 28th April, bcordance wititi law, It is Biade J5Y fhe corapeteat azifhorily on ^nuniinicated to the petitioner, ^f aiiy grievance stiU reraabi iv^il fhe reniedy available under ^n afresh, ^rvations aiid directious, the ^No. 1182/2005 and I.A.Nos. disposed of avkil ee^ified copy of this order, ^ Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge (^I^^Ra^)