MC 395/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE K. MERUNO Heard Mr. R. Goswami, learned counsel appearing for the applicant in thi s miscellaneous application, who is the appellant in MFA No.13 of 2011. By this application, the applicant is praying for stay of the operation of the impugned Judgment and Order dated 17.5.2010 passed by the learned Commiss ioner for Workmen’s Compensation, Cachar in WC Case No.44 of 2008. On 23.2.2011, it was ordered to issue notice upon the respondents. The learned counsel for th e appellant has drawn the attention of this Court to Misc. Case No.3026 of 2006 with regards to the application under section 5 of the Limitation Act praying fo r condoning the delay of 7 days. Office note in this Misc. Case dated 19.11.201 1 indicates that the AD Cards in respect of all the 4(four) respondents have bee n returned after due service of notice. Considering the office note in this misc . case, notices upon the respondents are deemed to have been effected. Coming back to the matter with regards to the stay of the impugned Judgm ent and Order, this Court is of the considered opinion that the appellant/petiti oner is directed to deposit 50% of the awarded amount to the Registry of this Co urt and the Registry of this Court shall keep the amount so deposited and shall not release the same without the permission of this Court. On depositing the sa id amount, the impugned order dated 17.5.2010 passed in WC Case No.44 of 2008 sh all remain suspended. Misc. case stands disposed of.