IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. WRIT PETITION NO. 5844 OF 2011 (Nitin Gajanan Pandure Vs. The Municipal Corporation, Aurnagabad) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mrs. Pooja V. Langhe, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. A.M. Karad, Advocate for the respondent ... CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 17.10.2011 P.C.:- 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner has filed a civil suit with respect to the subject matter of the present Petition. 3. In that view of the matter, we are not inclined to entertain the present Petition. In any event, the Petition arises out of a purely contractual obligation between the petitioner and the respondent, which in our view, cannot be gone into in the extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Writ Petition is rejected. Sd/- Sd/- arp [M. T. JOSHI, J. ] [B. R. GAVAI, J.]