Lsp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6673 of 2008 Smt. Sheela Ankush More ...Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents Smt. Leela Malu for the petitioner. K.R.Kokane for resopndent no.2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. DATED DATED DATED : 6TH JANUARY, 2009 : 6TH JANUARY, 2009 : 6TH JANUARY, 2009 P.C. . Heard Counsel for the parties. Although the grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent is capable of paying more maintenance amount, the fact remains that the petitioner has not produced any supporting material to establish the fact that the respondent has sufficient income to pay higher maintenance amount. 2. Realising this position, Counsel for the petitioner seeks time to produce additional material to support that contention. By way of indulgence, hearing of this petition is deferred till 2nd February, 2009. Further material accompanied by affidavit be filed in the Registry on or before 27th January, 2009 failing which petition to stand dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the Court. It will be open to the 2 respondents to file reply to the proposed further affidavit. That be done on or before 31st January, 2009. [A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.] [A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.] [A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.]