IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 28TH JULY 2009 / 6TH SRAVANA 1931 RP.No. 678 of 2009() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.5130/2009 Dated 01/04/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): /PETITIONER ---------------------- RAJENDRAN V.M., S/O. KAMALAKSHI E.A., VELLISSERIL HOUSE KARIPALANGAD PO, KULAMAVU VIA, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.THAMBAN RESPONDENT(S): /RESPONDENTS --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT OFFICER, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, DISTRICT OFFICE IDUKKI, KATTAPPANA. 2. THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY VYDHUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. MR.ALEXANDER THOMAS, SC, KPSC THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ---------------------------------------- Review Petition No.678 OF 2009 IN W.P.(C) No.5130 OF 2009 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of July, 2009. O R D E R The review petitioner is the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.5130 of 2009. As per the judgment rendered by this Court in the writ petition, the petitioner will be assigned due ranking in the main list, after considering the claim available to a Scheduled Tribe candidate. 2. In the review petition it is pointed out that the petitioner is ranked 152 in the rank list and he can be considered in an open merit vacancy also. It is pointed that 11 vacancies are there at present and the respondents are entertaining the doubt whether the petitioner could be considered in the O.C turn in the light of the directions issued by this Court in the judgment sought to be reviewed. 3. Learned standing counsel for the Public Service Commission submitted that already candidates upto 137 have R.P. No.678/2009 2 been advised in the O.C turn. It is clarified that the judgment will not stand in the way of considering the claim of the petitioner for advise in the open merit vacancy also. This review petition is accordingly disposed of. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp