IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3514 of 2010 VINOD RAM, SON OF BIGAU RAM, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-KAKRI KUNDI, P.S. – CHAINPUR, DISTRICT – KAIMUR AT BHABUA. …..Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …..Opposite Party. For the Petitioner : Mr. Kislay, Ajay Kumar (Adv.) For the State : APP. ----------- 04/ 20.05.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner is accused of the case which has been registered under Section 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code. One Shiv Murat Ram was also the named accused along with the petitioner. The informant has alleged that his two daughters namely Mamta Kumari and Manju Kumari aged 14 and 12 years respectively have been enticed away by the petitioner. The alleged victims examined under Sections 161 and 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure have stated nothing against the petitioner and Shiv Murat Ram. One victim has merely stated that Shiv Murat Ram has proposed to her for marriage. Shiv Murat Ram has been admitted to bail in Cr. Misc. No. 28815 of 2009 on 07.11.2009. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released from custody on bail on 2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/court concerned, Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with Chainpur P.S. Case No. 30 of 2009. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)