IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10213 of 2010 MANOJ MAHTO, S/o Yogendra Mahto. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 01.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 304B, 120B, 498A and 201 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Taking into consideration the fact that even though the occurrence is said to have taken place on 23.09.2005 and complaint was filed on 19.10.2005 and there is material to suggest that in fact the deceased died on account of diarrhoea and she was even treated before her death, let the petitioner above named who is in custody since 01.12.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with Jagdishpur (Goradih) P.S. Case No. 274 of 2005 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be - 2 - a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)