IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2595 OF 2005 Pratibha Vasant More & Anr. ...Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Vaibhav Karnik for Petitioners. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DECEMBER 1, 2005. DECEMBER 1, 2005. DECEMBER 1, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. My reading of the view taken by the Court below is that the application for return of property which was filed, was bereft of any details and particulars. To that extent, no fault can be found with the finding of the Court below. Besides, no document was produced to support the prayer nor any affidavit was filed. 2. In the circumstances, while disposing of : 2 : this Petition, it is observed that if the Petitioners prefer fresh application after compliance of all necessary requirements and produces relevant documents in that case, the said application be decided on its own merits in accordance with law. 3. If such application is filed, the same be disposed of preferably within two weeks from the date of its presentation. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.