IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.557 of 2008 SIYA RAM MAHTO SON OF LATE NIRDHAN MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE & P.O. CHAMARHARA, P.S. MAHNAR, DISTRICT VAISHALI …….PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VAISHALI, HAJIPUR 3. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, LAW ADMINISTRATION, BIHAR, PATNA 5. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA 6. THE HOME SECRETARY, BIHAR, PATNA 7. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VAISHALI, HAJIPUR 8. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, VAISHALI 9. THE POLICE OFFICER, MAHNAR, VAISHALI 10. RAGHUBANSH SINGH SON OF LATE RAVINDRA SINGH 11. RANJEET SAH SON OF LATE BHOLA SAH, BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.O. CHAMARHARA, P.S. MAHNAR, DISTRICT VAISHALI 12. MANU DEVI & MUNWA DEVI & BANU DAUGHTER OF RAGHUBANSH SINGH AND WIFE OF AJAY SINGH, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA SHASTRI NAGAR, HOUSE OWNER DUBEY JEE, HOME NO.2, ROAD NO.2, NEAR GANDHI MURTI, SHASTRI NAGAR, P.S.SHASTRINAGAR, DISTRICT PATNA 13. AJAY SINGH SON OF NOT KNOWN, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA SASTRI NAGAR, HOUSE OF DUBEYJI HOUSE NO.2, ROAD NO.2, NEAR GANDHI MURTI, P.S. SHASTRINAGAR, DISTRICT PATNA …….RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 19.02.2009 When the matter is taken up, Mr. Rabindra Kumar, appearing on behalf of the petitioner raises the grievance that Mahnar P.S.case No.118 of 2008 was lodged on 20th of June, 2007, but till date the investigation is pending. A.C. to G.P.11, appears on behalf of the State. Having heard learned Counsel for the party and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it expedient that respondent no.2, the Superintendent of Police, Vaishali, Hajipur ensures completion of the investigation of the aforesaid case without unnecessary 2 delay. I direct accordingly. Writ application stands disposed off with the observation aforesaid. Narendra/ (Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, ACJ.)