IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.9195 of 2009 Date of Decision:- 11.06.2009 Mam Chand and others ....Petitioner(s) vs. State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s) *** CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH *** Present:- Mr.R.S.Mamli, Advocate, for the petitioners. *** AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (Oral) Counsel for the petitioners submits that the case of the petitioners is similar to that in C.W.P.No.4952 of 2008 Jitender and others vs. State of Haryana and others decided on May 28, 2009. He would be satisfied if a similar order is passed by this Court. Without going into maintainability of writ petition, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with direction to the State to consider the claim made by the petitioners in their representation in accordance with law. The petitioners would be entitled to supply the record in regard to their title or ownership, on the basis of which they are making a claim in this regard. The State would also be at liberty to get this record from the State of Uttar Pradesh before passing any order. June 11, 2009 ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) poonam JUDGE