1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ADMIRALTY & VICE ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION ADMIRALTY SUIT NO.17 OF 2004. Fine Seafood & Meat Exports Pvt.Ltd. ...Plaintiffs. vs. A.P.Moller-Maersk A/S & others. ...Defendants. --- Ms.Reena Sharma i/b. Vibha Juris Consult Co. for plaintiffs. Ms.G.D'Souza i/b. K.R.Shriram, for Defendant nos.1 & 2. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH,J. DATED: 21st June, 2006. P.C.:- 1. The learned Counsel appearing for defendants points out that an order for appointment of commissioner for recording of evidence has been made in the month of August,2005, but the plaintiffs have not led any oral evidence. The learned Counsel 2 appearing for plaintiffs states that the plaintiffs have not been able to record any oral evidence because the Advocate appearing for plaintiffs are not getting any instructions from the plaintiffs. The statements are accepted. The suit is dismissed for non prosecution. ---