IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER THURSDAY, THE 7TH JUNE 2007 / 17TH JYAISHTA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 614 of 2007(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.15667/2006 .................... PETITIONER:1 ------------------ K.N.SOMADAS , AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.NARAYANAN NAIR, UPPER DIVISION CLERK (HIGHER GRADE), OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTURCTIONS,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.P.RAJEEVAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. JAMES VARGHESE, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER ) SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETRIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. M.SIVASANKAR, (AGE AND FTHER'S NAME NOW KNOWN TO THE PETR.) DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, JAGATHY,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.A.J.VARGHESE THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: A.K. Basheer, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Con.Case (c) No. 614 of 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 7th day of June, 2007. J U D G M E N T An affidavit has been filed by the respondents stating that the order has been complied with. However learned counsel for the petitioner takes exception to the subsequent order passed by the respondent on May 31, 2007. According to the petitioner the order passed is totally contrary to the directions contained in the judgment. I am afraid the above contention need not be looked into at this stage. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the respondent concerned, it will be open to him to pursue the matter in accordance with law. Contempt of Court Case is closed with the above observation. A.K. Basheer Judge. an.