1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Notice of Motion No.62 of 2007 in Appeal (L) No.619 of 2006 in Insolvency Petition No.7 of 2005 Pravin Haridas Kantaria and ors. . ..Appellants vs Anand Nanik Lulla ..Respondent. Mr. K.P. Jain i/b T.N. Tripathi & Co for the appellants Ms Kavita Lalvani for the respondent. Mr G.G. Ketkar lst Asst to Official Assignee. CORAM: J.N. PATEL,Acg C.J. ,& V.C. DAGA, J. DATE: March 16, 2007. P.C.:- Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The learned counsel for the respondent states that without prejudice to the merits of the matter, she has no objection in condoning the delay in presenting the Appeal. In view of this statement and for the reasons given in the affidavit in support of the motion, motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE V.C. DAGA, J.