IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPLICATION NO. 4832 OF 2009 Harinarayan G. Bajaj ..... ..... ...Applicant. V/s The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..... ... Respondents. Mr.A.H.H.Ponda, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.P.S.Hingorani, APP for the State. Ms.Revti Mohite-Dere, Adv. for the respondent Nos. 2 & 3. CORAM: B.R.GAVAI, J. 8th March, 2010. PC: The present application has been filed basically on the grievance that though this Court has on various occasions directed the learned trial Court to conclude the trial expeditiously the proceedings have not yet reached the logical end. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that in the present case cross examination of witnesses who are examined prior to framing of charges are voluminous and therefore it took some time to complete the arguments on the question of framing of charges or otherwise. The learned counsel makes a categorical statement that the respondent-accused would conclude their arguments on the said issue within eight hours. In that view of the matter application is disposed of with direction to the learned Magistrate to decide the issue regarding framing of charges or otherwise within period of one month from today. It is further made clear that the learned Magistrate shall give one hour every day on eight days for arguments of accused. 8.3.2010.