IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 23518 of 2000 Between: N.Srinivasa Madiga @ N.Srinivasulu S/o.Venkataiah Mediga Sankshema Sangam(Reg.) at Karakambaddi, Renigunta(M) Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Chittoor. 2 The Superintendent of Police, Chittoor District, Chittoor. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or direction preferably Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in not releasing the compensation to the victims in crime Nos.99/2000; 80/2000; 34/2000 and in Sc.No.17/2000 as per the provisions of the S.Cs. and S.Ts prevention of Atrocities Rules 1995 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to release the compensation by considering the representation of the petitioner dt:15.11.2000 and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. M.SRINIVAS, ADVOCATE FOR MR.KOWTURU VINAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel Sri.M.Srinivas, representing the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri.Kowturu Vinaya Kumar, submits that the matter has become infructuous. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 15.06.2005 VS To 1 The District Collector, Chittoor. 2 The Superintendent of Police, Chittoor District, Chittoor. 3 Two CCs to the G.P for Home, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad(O.U.T). 4 2 CD copies