>°- -°. !.n s if^. /^ (^- }^^- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) W.A. No. \^-2- /2010 (Arising out of order dated 19.04.2010 passed bv the Hontile Srnele Bench ofthis High Court, in W.P. (S) No. 1751/20101 APPELLANT Itwaru Ram Sahu S/o. Late Basru Rara Sahu Aged about 53 years Working as Sub-Inspector, P.S.: Kota O. P.: Belgahana, Distt.: BUaspur (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS ,\^:^ .^s^ y^^ f#ft~" ^': ^r^ <f?y ^- k^ / 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretary, Home Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipiir (C.G.). 2. Director Oeneral of PoUce, Police Head Quarter, Raipur, Distt.: RaipUT (CG). - 3. Chairman, Police Establishment Board, Police HeadQuarter, Raipur (C.G.). 4. Superintendent of PoUce, Office of S.P. BUaspur, Distt: Bilaspur (C.G.). WRITAPPEAL UNDER SECTION 2 (1) OFTHE CHHAmSGARH HIGH COURT (APPEAL TO THE DIVISION BENCH) ACT. 2006 Being aggrieved by die judgment dated 19.04.2010 passed by the Hon'ble Single Judge of this High Court in W.P. (S) No. 1751/2010,. copy of which has been enclosed herewith as Annexure A/l, the appeUants most humbly beg to prefer the instant appeal before ttus Hon'ble Court on the following facts 8s grounds amongst others :- |r^*^l(if^f'SWB ...„.]^ifc I ^(((i.issff**' ^M "••?»''? !S?<-'?";SS;;?;•'S^: 3Lp 01. uopoaiip B JQJ 'tifSnos Biie-japii steq 33iioE)p9d arp 'aSpi^ a]8TnS psuj^ aq^ acgaq ps^uoricpd iUA ui ^qissod sv ^[StiORTpadxa SB uotiBiussaidai sCR spiasp pue J3pisu(& pire JauBTa sip oim J[Qor i[Bqs sgpuoipnB yispuodsai iaqi ^GIO psioadxa sr ^i ^BLR pSAiasqo sSpnp 3l8ms PSLLIBSI stp '600&"TT'8I paiBp uOcfBWlssMdai srq jo uOTiBjsptsuoa-uoa o^ Ss^BpJ % SB j^ 6s jsuojwsd sqi jo 90UBA3U8 atp jo 'tpsdss.i UT 'jaAaAOH •J3SUR4 jo jspjo psugndmT acp isure8e psig: SBM qstqA uoiroad ipM pres gco SuissTmsTp OIOB/TS2,T"ojM'(s) d'A m aSpnp 3^9ws psitieai ST.R Aq passBd OTOe'^O^T pa^p j8pjo gip ^suregB psig uasq sBq {BaddB IUA siqj, •PJBSH •s •I isaaaao^su'iMa (OlOek90'Al( agaaoivao •AIOO SOIIBApiB UO siuapuodsaj/aiBig aqi JGJ psunoo 'Aapned HBdasGl ssiy^ -fUByQS.dis stp Joj psiinbo 'Aoy: ^qeN 'N "•IN s^NVS^ddV soozMswtoKMiga NOIg^Kt 03, ^T:y'xa^^a^!l3^S:''^X S S^SS3.EV'^X3 gHM, ^o ti te NOMLogs aaaNfl ivaaav AiaA •SA l-kCTJ^ ^.-r:./'' ^ oioe,io ZAT'ON 'rvahuw.uHA rf''ivMavwafNg*ia.NOH ^isnaaa&'M'i^a.NOHisa ^Etuisv^ia'HavQsujwHHO.ao.i.anooHoiH &I3I00 g pxiB qjBSsptBqqo jp a^eig sj.NgaNOdsam TiqBg mea TUBA^ ^svrrmasv ^ ®. Rao respondent authority to consider the representation dated 18.11.2009. 4. Therefore, without considering the merits of fhe case, one way or fhe other, we dispose of this appeal wifh a direction to respondent Nc).2 to consider and dispose of the representation of fhe petitioner as early as possible preferably wiflun a penod ofone monfh from fhe date of production of certified copy of this order alQngwitti fhe eopy ofrepresentation before Director General ofPolice. 4. The impi%ned order passed by the leamed sii^le Judge shall stand mei^ed with fhe above order. ^ 5. With fhe above observation/diTection, this petiticai stands finally disposedofatthe motion stage itself, Sd/- ^Quddus, ige Sd/- N.K.AgrawaI Judge I"!