SM 1 906.ao.1176.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1176 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1557 OF 2011 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1176 OF 2011 Madhukant Zaverchand Ghatalia ....Appellant. Versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ....Respondent. ____________ Mr. A. G. Lad i/b Aparna Murlidharan for the Appellant. Ms. K. K. Soraan for the Respondent-BMC. Mr. K. H. Mody for the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. CORAM: R. M. BORDE, J. DATED : OCTOBER 19, 2011. P.C.: The counsel appearing for the appellant makes a statement that considering the fact that the construction of the loft and toilet which are in existence prior to 15th August, 1997, he would tender an application to the Executive Engineer, Building Proposal, Bombay for regularisation. If such a proposal is tendered to the authorised officer within a period of four weeks from today, same shall be considered within a period of six weeks thereafter in accordance with the provisions of law and after extending an opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned. In the meanwhile, no adverse action shall be taken against appellant. If the decision rendered by the authorised officer is adverse to the interest of the appellant, the same shall not be put to execution for a period of two weeks thereafter to enable the appellant to approach the Appellate Authority. SM 2 906.ao.1176.11 2. With these directions, the Appeal from Order stands disposed of. In view of disposal of the Appeal from Order, Civil Application does not survive and stands disposed of. (R. M. BORDE, J.)