IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. -M No. 22586 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.8.2011 Dharam Pal ..Petitioner. Vs. State of Punjab ..Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present : Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Rajesh Bindal, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is a Panch in village and he was not even present when the alleged occurrence took place where some obstruction in the free flow of rain water was sought to be removed by other villagers. As no action was taken against aggressive party, Deputy Commissioner had to intervene and write a letter to the Superintendent of Police for taking appropriate action. It was thereafter that FIR was registered against the complainant party, otherwise the injuries allegedly suffered by the complainant party in the present case were found to be simple. Learned counsel for the State did not dispute the fact that all the injuries allegedly suffered by the complainant party are simple. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid facts, the petitioner is directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on 19.8.2011 at 10 A.M. for joining investigation. In case of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer. He shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called upon for further investigation. He shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands disposed of. ( Rajesh Bindal ) 11.8.2011 Judge Meenu