IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 27 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 611 OF 2007 SHRI. VINAYAK G. WARTY ... Petitioner Versus SHRI. MICHAEL M. D\'SOUZA AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. J. P. Mulgaonkar, Advocate for the petitoiner. Ms. S. Mordekar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. V. Rodrigues, Advocate for respondent No.4. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 8th April, 2009 P.C. Heard Mr. Mulgaonkar for the petitioner, Ms. Mordekar for respondent No.2 and Mr. Rodrigues for respondent No.4. An affidavit filed on behalf of respondent No.4 is taken on record. 2. The petitioner has filed the present contempt petition, alleging that action in terms of Order dated 18.12.2007 passed in Writ Petition No. 611/2007 is not taken by respondents No.2 and 4. The affidavits filed on behalf of respondents No.2 and 4 discloses that action has been taken by respondents No.2 and 4, though late. 3. Considering the circumstances of the case, I am of the considered opinion that this is not a fit case to proceed with the contempt proceedings against respondents no.2 and 4. Therefore, contempt proceedings against respondents No.2 and 4 are dropped. Petition stands disposed of. Needless to mention that disposal of this petition will not come in the way of the parties seeking appropriate remedy, if available in law. A. P. LAVANDE, J. ssm.