IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-29009 of 2009 (O/M). Date of Decision : November 16, 2009. Sunil and others ...... Petitioner(s). Versus. Diwan Singh ..... Respondent(s). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH. Present:- Mr. V.K. Jindal, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the complainant-respondent. AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL). Counsel for the petitioners contends that the allegations against petitioner No. 1-Sunil is that he had given a lathi blow on the right side of the complainant and the injury is simple in nature. Petitioner No. 2- Arjun is alleged to have given a lathi blow to Isham Singh on his back, which injury is again simple in nature and petitioner No. 3-Nar Singh is alleged to have raised a lalkara. He further contends that the petitioners have been summoned in a private criminal complaint to face trial. He further contends that the petitioners are ready and willing to join the trial proceedings and cooperate with the same. He, therefore, prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Counsel for respondent, on the other hand, submits that concession of bail should not be granted to the petitioners as specific roles have been attributed to them. Criminal Misc. No. M-29009 of 2009. I have heard counsel for the parties and have gone through the records of the case. Keeping in view the nature of injuries and roles attributed to the petitioners, the present petition is allowed. The petitioners are directed to appear before the learned Trial Court on the date fixed and the learned Trial Court shall admit them to bail to its satisfaction on their appearance before it. (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) JUDGE November 16, 2009. sjks. -2-