IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA ITAs No.47,48,49,50,54,55,56 of 2007 and 1,9 & 11 of 2008 Date of decision : December 9, 2011 ITA No.47/2007 Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla …Appellant. Versus Shri Narain Dass (late) through Chinta Devi V&PO Jhakri, Tehsil Rampur Bushehr, District Shimla. …Respondent. ITA No.48/2007 Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla …Appellant. Versus Sabir Dass, resident of V&PO Jhakri, Tehsil Rampur Bushehr, District Shimla. …Respondent. ITA No.49/2007 Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla …Appellant. Versus Shri Dhundi Ram son of Shri Totu Ram, resident of V&PO Jhakri, Tehsil Rampur Bushehr, District Shimla. …Respondent. ITA No.50/2007 Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla …Appellant. Versus Smt. Krishna Devi wifie of Shri J.R. Negi, Resident of V&PO Jhakri, Tehsil Rampur Bushehr, District Shimla. …Respondent. ITA No.54/2007 Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla …Appellant. Versus Shri Sita Ram son of Shri Mulku, Resident of V&PO Jhakri, Tehsil Rampur Bushehr, District Shimla. …Respondent. …2… ITA No.55/2007 Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla …Appellant. Versus Shri Lachhu Ram, resident of V&PO Jhakri, Tehsil Rampur Bushehr, District Shimla. …Respondent. ITA No.56/2007 Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla …Appellant. Versus Shri Lumbru Ram c/o Shri Thoin Ram, resident of V&PO Jhakri, Tehsil Rampur Bushehr, District Shimla. …Respondent. ITA No.1/2008 Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla …Appellant. Versus Shri Lumbru Ram c/o Shri Thoin Ram, resident of V&PO Jhakri, Tehsil Rampur Bushehr, District Shimla. …Respondent. ITA No.9/2008 Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla …Appellant. Versus Shri Shyam Lal son of Shri Shiva Nand, resident of V&PO Jhakri, Tehsil Rampur Bushehr, District Shimla. …Respondent. ITA No.11/2008 Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla …Appellant. Versus Shiva Nand, resident of V&PO Jhakri, Tehsil Rampur Bushehr, District Shimla. …Respondent. …3… Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Appellants : Mr. Vishal Mohan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, Judge Since common questions of law and facts are involved in all the appeals, the same were taken up together and are being disposed of by a common judgment. 2. Following common substantial questions of law were framed in all these appeals: i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Hon’ble ITAT was correct in holding that the interest comprised in the amount of enhanced compensation received unconditionally to the assessee could not be taxed as income until the appeals if any, against the award of enhanced compensation were finally decided by the higher Courts? ii) Whether the Hon’ble ITAT was correct in holding that the interest on enhanced compensation actually received by the assessee was not taxable in the year of receipt on the ground that such interest had not yet accrued, ignoring the fact that the assessee was not following any method of accounting for such interest Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? …4… and hence, under Section 5 of the Income Tax Act, read with Section 145 and Section 45(5), such interest was taxable on the basis of receipt? 3. It is jointly represented by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties that the substantial questions of law raised in these appeals are no more res integra, in view of the law laid down by their Lordships of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax versus Ghanshyam (HUF), (2009) 315 ITR 1(SC). Consequently, all the appeals are disposed of. ( R.B. Misra ), J. December 9, 2011(sd) ( Rajiv Sharma ), J