HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI$G&RH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION IS) NO. 4740 OF 2008 EgPGNDENTS 1. $tate of Chhattisgarh, ihmugh Director, TITIGNER Ganesh Ram Gaharwar Sio Baisaku Gahamlar aged about 67 years Rio Vlhage Kormi Pos‘ Hardlkala Tahsil and District Bliasgur (CG) Versus Adim Jati Welfare Department, Chha‘ctisgarh Government, Rainur (CG). 2. Accoutant General, Chhattisgarh Governemnt, Raipur (CG). 3. Assistant Cammissioner, Adiwasi Vlkas, Korba (CG). 4. Secretary, Adrm Jatr Welf¢re Department Ministry, Chhattrsgarh Government Raipur (CG). Collecter, Adiwasi Vlkas, Korba, District Korba (CG). 6. Biock Education Officer, Korba, District Korba (CG). (Writ petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of India) Singie Bench : Hon’ble Shri satish K. Agnihotri, J. Stui Shasht Kumar Kushwaha, counsei for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate tor the Statelreepondents. ORAL ORDER Present : (Paeeed on thisT“ 28 day of August, 2008) With the consent of learned counseb appearing for the parties, the matter is heard finaity. 2) This case pertains to grievance of non-grant of retriai dues. 3) This Court, in the matter of Baijnath Mandai vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others (W.P.No.4642/2004) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retrial dues as the (imputed question of facts were Involved The Commrttee was constituted nv the State Government pursuant to the order dated 19 6-2006 passed m WPNo 1961/7006 (Smt Keja Bar Chandrakar vs The @tate Govt of Chhattgsgarn & Others) and order dated 133-2008 passed in PE R MuC.C.No.105i2008 (State of Chhattisgarh & Others vs. Baijnath Mandai & Another), Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgmant and order dated 31“ January. 2008 passed in W.P.No.4642f20n4 Baijnath Mandal (supra) a3 submitted by learned counsel appearing for the parties This petition is accordingly di$posed of in the same terms Lei, the afiice of the Advocate Genera! is directeti to $ehd the hase to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of thie order and a copy of the petition from the petitioners. Thereafter, the Committee shail issue notice to the petitioner and effrcers eoncerned within a further period of 15 days. The Committee 3haii consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may tile additional documente, if necessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retriai dues, if any, to the petitioner, be completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, 5) The petitioner shell supply one complete set of the petition to the State counsel for trensfetring the same to the Committee. 5) ln case of grievance with regard to non-payment of peneionery dues, it is not necessary to tile a writ petition before this Court directly. The representation/app!ication can be moved before" Pension Committee as stated above. The Pension Committee shell not refuse to entertain the representationlapplicant, if so tiled directly. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 4) Thakur