(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. SECOND APPEAL NO. 317 OF 2005 Gangadhar s/o. Balaji Jethe, Age : 35 years, .. Appellant Occupation : Service, (Original R/o. Biloli, Dist. Nanded. defendant) versus Hanmabai w/o. Gangadhar Jethe, Age : 30 years, .. Respondent Occupation : Agriculture, (Original R/o. Biloli, Dist. Nanded. plaintiff) ....................... Mr. N.S. Chaudhary, Advocate, for the appellant. ........................ CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 17TH MARCH 2010 COURT'S ORDER : 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant, extensively. (2) 2. The husband is against grant of maintenance in favour of the wife, confirmed by both the courts i.e. in Regular Civil Suit No. 21/2000 and Regular Civil Appeal No. 14/2004. 3. The marital status entering at the minority of the parties is not in controversy. The second marriage of the husband, appellant herein, also is not in controversy. The income assessed by the learned Judge, cannot be said to be on higher pedestal. The economy of cereals and bread needs to be looked into and in the present scenario, it is seldom that the order under challenge requires interference. It does not project any illegality or perversity. The Second Appeal does not indicate any substantial question of law to be formulated. Consequently, there is no merit in the appeal and it is accordingly dismissed. ( K.U. CHANDIWAL ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/sa317