1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1219 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1507 OF 2010 Smt. Saloni P. Akolkar ...Appellant. v. The M.C.G.M. ...Respondent. Mr.Ashutosh Shukla i/by V.V.Mishra, advs., for the Appellant. Mr.Vinod Mahadik, adv. for the respondent/M.C.G.M. CORAM : J.H.Bhatia, J. DATE : 15th October, 2010 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Appellant before this Court is the original plaintiff, who had filed L.C.Suit No. 2098 of 2010 challenging the notice under Section 351 issued by the Municipal Corporation. According to him, his structure is situated in the slum area and it is in existence since prior to 1983 and, therefore, it could not be demolished. He also took out notice of motion. The trial Court refused to grant ad-interim relief while notice of motion is still pending. Against that order, plaintiff has preferred the present appeal. Admittedly, the Municipal Corporation/Defendant had not filed any reply in the notice of motion. In view of the pleadings and the circumstances, in my opinion, following directions will meet the ends 2 of justice: (i)The Municipal Corporation shall file reply to the notice of motion within three weeks and the trial Court shall hear the parties and dispose off the notice of motion within four weeks thereafter. Pending the decision of the notice of motion, the Municipal Corporation shall not act upon the impugned notice under Section 351 of the B.M.C.Act. 2 Appeal and the application stand disposed off accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA, J.) 3