..^^ c^i \o.i<'c-'' .. \^.*;^.9-'" ^^v V>G.-^ 1\ J'\'f..-^^ ; ;Fa ='^a . ^s^^?^ " if l<fiisMl.F R?Si!'FtiSB s~fc 'GC^I;^ ;»SS.3 ^'.^' r> o. ^<a'.^--' dAr- l07^__ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fSl N0. 3-^32//2010 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PETITIONER iitflH RESPONDENTS 01. 02. Gopal Ram Verma, aged about 51 years, son of Shri Udit Ram Verma, occupation - Asst. Teacher, Presently working as Lecturer, Govt Higher Secondary School Mahoodmachando, Vikas Khand - Ambagarh Chowki, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of Tribal, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Asst. Commissioner, Deptt of Tribal, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) 3. Joint Director (Treasury, A/c & Pension), Raipur (CG) 4. Block Education Officer, Block - Ambagarh Chowki, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG). PARTICULARS ABOUT THE PETITIONER As per cause title. PARTICULARS ABOUT THE RESPONDENTS As per cause title. PARTICULARS OF ORDER AGAINST WHICH THE INSTANT PETITION IS BEING "">»»-, Being aggrieved by non-providing benefit of two advance increments despite having B.T.I. Certificate obtained on his own cost prior to entering into service. Petitioner prefers this petition on the following facts and grounds: rfk'"* ll^ 311^1 W V/i-H* TWT sn^ff'^inqi 'TSf ^|t||y<<,. 0T1]^'K»,l^tRTtp: —.^..•.?15'J.^.:.1112-2.i.0. s^l '^^ (y3^^) ^nw^ft^^n^Ff SB : Hon'ble Shri Manlndra Mohan 23-07^010 Shri A. N. Bhakta, counselfor Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Panel advance copy. Heard. ?he petitioner. 1-awyer for the State/respondents on ortter Learned counsel appearing petitioner is entitled to benefit of twi| he having passed B.T. ]. examinaticti oost. It is submitted that the issue tonger res integra and the same ha4 Supreme Court in the oase of Ashc 2009 (III) MPJR (SC) 59. It is furth^ taken a similar view in his W.P.(S)No,6257of2008. Learned c): attention of this Court to order datetl No. 124 of 2009, wherein relying upo|i in the oase of Asha Saxena (supra) another Writ Appeal No.87/2009,1 consideration of the oase for grant] circular dated 21-09-1974 issued by| verification of the facts pleaded in th^ Learned counsel for the re^pi petittoner would also be conskJered tfti^ta^ tll^^ ^f f^Zt -(.[^f^K i;3lfOT3II^( Shrivastava. J. |for the petitioner submits that the advance inorements on account of before his appointment at his own tivolved in the present petition is no been finally decided by the Hon'ble Saxena vs. State ofM.P. & Ors., ^r submitted that this Court has atso dated 06-02-2009 passed in )unsel fbr the petitioner lurther draws 29^)4-2010 passed in Writ Appeal the juc^ment of the Supreme Court ind the order passed by this Court in directions have been issued for of two advanoe increments as per the State of Madhya Pradesh, after petition, submits that case of the the same lines. re^Dondents din ?ifre^"^N^1in^;,.^T-T,:cFltt?---FS/t47~2/2010—1,00,000. ^ - ..-'^' 'S^S '^WW<i, 0Tll<-f'i(o, fq<11<H:l< . \^.^ ^NM.I^-^'VVO y^^...............^................,....^... sn^!^5H?(ipf5^P) 3n^[w1?!TO? TWT 3n^[ ai+([qh SB"" Tumsne In view of the statement rrjade above, this petition is finally disposed of with a direction to the re^pondent authorities to consider and deoide the claim of the petitioner for per circular dated 21-09-1974 issueip by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verifteation of the facts pleaded ^i the petition within a period of eight Weeks from today. •<>l'<(cl<ii-1 'WWff fl ft%t liatt^K ^siRman^ grant of two advance increments as Sd-/ ManindraMohanShrivastava Judge Bwflfl ^°ltagynS?,.B?!-I-ip]Tii'—f'S/147—2/2»in—1,00,000.