IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.784 of 2005 HARI NARAYAN PRASAD, son of Shri Sita Ram Prasad, resident of village – Kala Matihaniyan, P S Bishambharpur, District – Gopalganj. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Collector, Gopalganj. 3. The Collector, Purnea. 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Gopalganj. 5. The Deputy Collector, Establishment, Gopalganj. 6. The Block Development Officer, Manjha, Gopalganj. 7. The Director, Agriculture, Government of Bihar, Patna. ----------- 04. 20.9.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner after some submissions and taking into consideration the counter affidavit, which came to be filed on behalf of respondent No.3, has decided to tactically withdraw from the challenge made against the order of termination. The material and evidence which has come in the said counter affidavit obviously does not make out a case in favour of the petitioner. In fact the Court was inclined to get the matter investigated, may be by vigilance in view of what has emerged in this case. This Court is not willing to consider the case of the petitioner on the ground that some other similarly appointed persons have been able to keep their job. It is left to the respondents to look into the matter and decide whether their appointment was on identical circumstance and requires to be re-looked. The writ application is dismissed as withdrawn. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)