1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. CONTEMPT PETITION NO.74 OF 2009 IN PIL WRIT PETITION NO.47 OF 2009 Datta Ladu Warang and others ..Petitioners. Vs. State of Maharashtra and others ..Contemnors. .... Mr. Jayen Trivedi for the Petitioner. Mr. J. Saluja, AGP for the State – Respondent No.1. Mr. K.K. Singhavi, Senior Advocate with Ms T.H. Puranik for the BMC – Respondent / Contemnor. .... CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 18th August, 2009. P.C. : The learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the Municipal Corporation states that the Municipal Corporation has in pursuance of a tender that was accepted by the Standing Committee on 11th February, 2009 only entered into a contract for the renovation of the facilities at the swimming pool and that the swimming pool is not, as a matter of fact, being privatized. Learned counsel further clarifies that the pool shall be 2 maintained and conducted by the Municipal Corporation. Learned counsel states that in the event that the Petitioner seeks any further details about the tender and the date of completion mentioned in the tender, the relevant information shall be provided. In view of the aforesaid statement, no further directions are required in the exercise of the contempt jurisdiction. The contempt petition is accordingly disposed of. *****