IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1301 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1301 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1301 OF 2008 1. Shailesh J. Dawda. 2. Siddharth V. Jadhav. ... Applicants. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. R.D.Suryawanshi for the applicant. Ms.P.P.Shinde, A.P.P. for the State. P.V.Damodaran for the orginal complainant. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 2nd July 2008. DATED: 2nd July 2008. DATED: 2nd July 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- . Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. This application is under section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The applicants are apprehending their arrest in M.Case of Vashi Police Station (number not known) for the offences punishable under sections 406, 420, 468, 120-B read with section 34 of Indian Penal Code. 3. Some of the receipts produced are duly signed by the applicants projecting themselves as authorised persons on behalf of builder. No authorisation in that behalf is on record. The account books maintained in regular course of business are not produced to substantiate this contention though the applicants were asked to produce it for prima facie satisfaction of this Court. In these circumstances, it is not a fit case; wherein the applicants should be granted anticipatory bail. The matter is under investigation. The investigating officer is bound to investigate according to law. 4. In the result, application is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE