IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINTIAL Writ Petition No. 1437 (SS) of 2011 Bhuwan Prakash Singh …Petitioner Versus Committee of management, Uchattar Madiymick Vidayalaya Ghighartola, and others …Respondents Mr. R.C. Tamta, learned counsel present for the petitioner. Mr. N.P. Sah, learned standing counsel present for the State of Uttarakhand. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) Heard Mr. R.C. Tamta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. N.P. Sah, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. The petitioner is working on a Class-IV post on daily rate basis in a grant in aid school and he is getting salary from by the Committee of Management of the school. The case of the petitioner is that his father had donated some land to the committee of management and at that time committee of management had assured the father of the petitioner that as and when the Class-III post becomes vacant in the school an appointment shall be given to the petitioner. The petitioner relies upon the various resolution of the committee of management, to this effect. The contention of the petitioner is entirely misconceived and no benefit can be given to the petitioner for the resolution of the committee of management. These resolutions itself are totally in violation of the law. The committee of management gets its funds from the State Exchequer to run the school and it cannot resolve to give such post to the petitioner or any other individual as a largesse. The writ petition is totally misconceived and is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) Dated: 20.10.2011 VKG