IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52203 of 2008 BHAGWAN BAITHA, Son of Nagina Baitha, resident of village-Murwan Arazi, P.S.Isuapur, District-Saran at Chapra. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 29.1.2009 Heard Sri Yogesh Chandra Verma, senior counsel for the petitioner, Sri Sumanth Singh, Advocate for the Informant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is not named in the FIR of a case under Section 302 IPC in which only two persons were suspected to have murdered the mother of the informant and to have thrown her dead body in a bamboo clump. The motive was there on account of the illicit relationship which the deceased was carrying with accused Puna Singh and he wanted to usurp her properties also and as such, committed the offence with Nageshwar Singh. The rejection order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge does not contain any reference to any material which could justify the refusal of the prayer, except that the petitioner was accused in four other cases. In absence of any tangible material and meaningful facts there does not appear any reason why the petitioner should not be admitted to bail. Let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran in Isuapur P.S.Case No.81 of 2007. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )