1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 3932 of 2007 Vijay Gopikisan Agrawal Vs. State of Mah. & Ors. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA & C. L. PANGARKAR JJ. Dated: 26 th August, 2008. By this petition the petitioner basically sought direction against respondent No. 2 Chief Officer Municipal Council Kamptee for removing encroachment made on the alleged reserved land for weekly market. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents make a statement that the encroachment have already been removed and accordingly written submission is also filed on record along with 2 the photographs. In view of this we see that there is no case made out by the petitioner for prayer clause (1). So far as other prayer clauses are concerned that cannot be granted as averments are not sufficient to consider them with respect to the shifting of Timber Merchants from the land reserved for weekly market to the land reserved for Timber Merchants which according to respondents is also factually incorrect and without any basis. Resolution – Subject No.5 passed by the Municipal Council dated 14/07/1998 is also challenged in the present petition. There is no case to interfere with the said Resolution at the instance of the petitioner after 10 years. In view of this petition is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE svk