THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.22859 OF 2011 ORDER: The proceedings under challenge is a letter addressed by the second respondent to the first respondent dated 29.06.2011, whereby the second respondent informed that the Pattadar Pass Book, issued to the petitioner, was obtained basing on an unregistered sale agreement; and it may, therefore, be cancelled. Sri K. Rathanga Pani Reddy, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, would contend that the second respondent had acted illegally in recommending to the first respondent cancellation of the Pattadar Pass Book of the petitioner. It is wholly unnecessary for this Court to examine the merits of the contention urged by the learned counsel, inasmuch as the proceedings dated 29.06.2011, is merely an internal correspondence between the first respondent and the second respondent. A copy of the said letter is not even marked to the petitioner. No order of cancellation has been passed and it is not even known whether the first respondent would act on the so called recommendation of the second respondent. Internal correspondence, in such matters, cannot be made the basis for adjudication in proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Leaving it open to the petitioner to avail all such remedies as are available to him in law in case an order is passed against him, the Writ Petition is dismissed. However, in the circumstances, without costs. _____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J August 17, 2011 MD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.22859 OF 2011 August 17, 2011 MD