HIGH COURT OF CHHArFISGARH AT BIIASPUR WRIT PETITION (O No. S411 ot 2W7 PETITIONER8 RESPONDENTS 1. Ramjee, S/o Bodhawa Kewat, Aged about 40 yeais. 2. Lobtaram S/o Duklaha Sahu, aged 55 yeais. 3. Dinabaffldhu S/o Amar Sin^i Verma, Aged about 45 years. 4. Sadaram S/o Mohanlal Lohar, Aged about 47 years. 5. Ram Moorti S/o Seltoilal Sahu, Aged about 54 years. 6. Khelmal S/o Mollchand Jain, Aged aboirt 62 years. AI1 R/o villages Nevnara Post - Hasda Thana and Tahsil - Beria, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) VERSCS 1. State of Chhattisgarii, Throu^i its Seeretaiy, Depattment of Panehay^ and Enviroametrt Mantralaya, DK8 Bhawaa, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Collector, Durg. 3. Sub Divisional Officer, Ssga. Btock. Saja- Tahsil Beria, Distt. Duig. 4. Tahsildar, Tahsil - Berla, Distt. Durg. 5. Sarpaach Gram Panchayat Newiuua Vflcas Khand- Berla, Distt. - Durg. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmjnON OF INDIA. SBsHmi'ble Shri Satish K. AsnBiotri, J. Present: ShriRaghavendraPradhan, AdvocatefortliBpetitioner. Sliri Vinay Harit, Deputy Advoeate General fwtheState. 0»Di» (Passed on Q71h day of September, 2007) 1. Learaed couasel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have acquired tMe over the disputed land. The Oram Pandayat, Newwa, by nnpupied order dated 24.08.2007 (Annexure P/l) has directed Ihe petitioners to remove the disputed strueture within 7 days, failing wluchAe saaie wcwld be fwceiiiUv removed. 2. Leamed eounsel fiuther submits that no opportumty ofhearing was gven to the petitioners. Leamed counsel sedcs pennission to withdraw fhe petition and two week's time to take recourse to civil proeeedings. It is ordered accordingly. 3. Ia view ofthe above, this petition is dismissed with tfae above stated liberty. However. fhe respondents are directed not to take any steps for dispossession oflhe petitioner fi-om the disputed property for a period oftwo weeks ftom today i.e. 07.09.2007. Certified copy offhe order, today. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Anit