IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Appeal No.2818-SB of 2010 (O & M) Date of Decision: July 11, 2011 Ranjit Singh .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS Avtar Singh & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. G.S. Sidhu, Advocate, for the appellant- complainant. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. Complainant has approached this Court for payment of compensation. 2. It has been contended that because the respondent-accused have been released on probation on their furnishing personal bonds in the sum of ` 10,000/- each with one surety in the like amount for keeping peace and being of good behaviour for a period of one year and in breach thereof, to appear before the trial Court to serve the sentence as and when called for, the appellant-victim should have been given some compensation. Crl. Appeal No. M-2818-SB of 2010 [2] 3. I have considered the plea of learned counsel. 4. It has not been shown as to the nature and extent of injury suffered by the victim (appellant-complainant). Reasons have been assigned for release of the accused on probation. 5. No ground for interference is made out. 6. Appeal is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) July 11, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?