Crl. Misc. No. M-365 of 2011 (O&M) [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-365 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 15, 2011 Sanjay Sharma ....................................................... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another ................................ Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. ... RITU BAHRI, J. This petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for grant of Anticipatory bail in complaint bearing No. 124/1/2005 dated 4.7.2005 titled as “Surjit Kumar v. Sanjay Sharma & Anr” under Sections 3/4 SC Act pending in the Court of JMIC, Jalandhar. Counsel for the petitioner has argued that no offence under Section 3 and 4 of the Schedule Caste Act is made out as per the contents of the FIR. The respondent/complainant had filed petition for registration of a case vide Annexure P6 in this Court and in paragraph 10 the alleged Crl. Misc. No. M-365 of 2011 (O&M) [ 2 ] words used by the petitioner are in contradiction with the contents of the FIR and language attributed to the petitioner. Vide order dated 29.7.2010 the accused has been summoned to face trial under Section 323 IPC and 3 and 4 of Schedule Caste Act. The complaint under Section 307 IPC stands dismissed. The co-accused has already been granted anticipatory bail on the ground that he is not a Scheduled Caste was not covered under the Schedule Caste Act as per Section 3 of the 1989 Act. In view of the contradiction in the contents of FIR and petition filed in this Court by the complainant, the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Jalandhar. 15.3.2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Rupi JUDGE