RSA No. 635 of 2007 12.3.2009 Present: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Chander Narayan Singh, Advocate for the respondent. CMP No. 557/2008 On 26th February, 2008, this Court had directed Tehsildar, Rakkar, Kangra, H.P., to carry out the demarcation of the suit property. In terms of the report dated 3rd April, 2008, the Tehsildar has expressed his difficulty in carrying out the demarcation as the revenue record was found to be faulty and as such a request has been made that the Settlement Department be directed to depute its trained staff for identifying and rectifying the mistakes. In terms of the present application the respondent has prayed that the appeal be decided in accordance with the earlier demarcation report. The request cannot be allowed for the simple reason that the order dated 26th February, 2008, was passed with the consent of the parties. It is not a case where no demarcation can be carried out. The Tehsildar has only expressed certain difficulties and therefore, requested for deputing staff of the Settlement Department. I see no reason as to why the demarcation in the presence of the parties cannot be carried out after verifying the correct record. Under these circumstances the Settlement Officer, Kangra, is directed to depute sufficiently trained staff for -2- identifying and rectifying the mistakes as noticed by the Tehsildar in his report dated 3rd April, 2008. Mr. Ramakant Sharma, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he shall supply a copy of the order to the Settlement Officer as also the Tehsildar with an endeavour that the demarcation takes place at the earliest in compliance with the orders dated 26th February, 2008. Application is disposed of. Dasti copy. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. March 12, 2009 (PK)