IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31919 of 2011 Dinesh Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 3 12-12-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report but it is stated that during course of investigation, looted motorcycle was recovered from the house of the petitioner which is evident from perusal of paragraph-75 of the case diary. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was remanded in Muffasil P.S. Case No. 84 of 2008 on 16-08-2011 and since then, he is in jail custody. It is also pointed out by him that on 03-09- 2010, the I. O. of the present case raided the house of the petitioner but nothing was recovered from the house of the petitioner which is evident from perusal of paragraph-60 of the case diary. It is further contended by him that even if it assumed that any recovery has been made from the house of the petitioner on 25-11- 2010, then also, the petitioner is not responsible for the alleged recovery because he was in jail custody on the above-said date of the recovery. 2 Although learned counsel for the state points out some criminal antecedents of the petitioner, but considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Dinesh Kumar be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 175 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Sri R. R. Singh, learned Judicial Magistrate-Ist Class, Begusarai. AKVishwakarma ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)