IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR $ingle $§mch @ W.P. (S) NO. 3;}§ Z /2009 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PETITIONER Mitthulal Prajapati, S/O. Bhaiyalal Prajapati, Aged about 52 years, R/o. Ravanbhata, Pithora, Dist Raipur (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1] State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Forest Department, D.K.S. , Bhawzm, Raipuly District Ruipur (CG) 2] Chief Conservator of Forest, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) / 3] Divisional Forest Officer (Samanya Van Mandal), Mahasamundr District Mahasamund (CG) m 31%??2: “r1911 «WW S‘m Mama} Parangap cam Sh i bume¢h Baja} GA for ts h nge in fhi$ petitian pa$sed by respmdem N93 m \A as Farest Guard at Rampur Bee; been %ransferred {‘0 ihe owan of 5 C0n€ent§on of the counse presem": mace 0f posting ‘ihe pe%‘st m Eew man 2 and V2 years ‘Eher which awarding ta him Es in vieia‘i b n’ts ihmt am“ Var . is uf the p: t gc It onw Is carpuHecé €o g6 Emd Mn a$ n s Lrarafe {ed piacu, .x wand bu J §L far mm £0 aake care or hi$ parwts Cam? .cr 31$ *espmm xas/Smte saamzta thai: the cm iha me ordw 'rqpugwed can rm 3e u}! has aw g‘ ‘8‘! m w r counse: far ihe §a wmey mmxwaé wm’Wt’fwmn $3ifanm w; i" r? k ae§ for the petmoner. Ie {esmndents/Stata. §s to the {mar ciaied 9.7.2QDQ hich ihe pe’iiiicner whe is wafking Foa'est Range Mahasamuna‘ has ‘omsi Semen/afar. 'fm ”the paii'tmner %s inat ! J. m the L‘ oner hazi gomad an 17.52%? anti a ‘ fmm he has eram bear shif‘éed or: 0f i‘he t. ans.er Fo‘icy He fwther {iiigncr are Few} ng W1? mm ami H comemed which wauia‘ ba deem pragesition 9f the Ewe coun$eL hi3 agrggmem. gs’auna‘s taken by ihe pe‘zi‘iiener; én$rfe¥e£§ wiih. He however gubrriits 'ihat 3f the peYgtmner {d him make a auiighie rapmseniaéon a the aué‘hwiiigg iii iaw .Gthis WWW,W, mtg 1‘7 C3 ammm WWW WW ‘ %&1T?mm ' ‘tl‘ie J-L-u me petitimer make$ a renresenie Wiihm a period 0f 1Q days from t wafer, i'he au+¢h0rist§es comemed furme? period 0f thre$ weeks frcm Acccrdmgiy, the p§tit§ora is {disposed of with a direction ihat if itian w :hs auihariiie$ concerned 1e date cf receipi a‘f copy cf ihis aha}; decide ihe same wiihin a .he dame of its receip‘i. it £3 made dear ihat inis Caurt case ami ihe auihermes co has not cemmemed 0n The merits 0f §ree i0 deciée the acemed are ; www-w\q%w--+¢wwm mmm‘g”3%g/mémm 200 WW (Wm rspz'esei-Ttmion af the petiiianer smctiy in accordamce wii‘h iaw Sd/— Pritink‘er Eiwaker kg ‘ ‘ Judge / L ‘ I . t ¢ i l i ' . 7L 4