IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5823 of 2009 Ramprit Singh, S/o- Jagdish Prasad, resident of village Dhamauli Bigha, P.S. Rahui, P.O. Wena, District-Nalanda. …….. Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar …. Opposite Party. ----------- 02 12.02.2009 Heard the Parties. The petitioner is the husband, who is accused in Rahui (Wena) P.S. Case No. 57 of 2007 registered under Sections 498A, 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ Dowry Prohibition Act. The earlier bail application was rejected by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 12818 of 2008 by order dated 09.05.2008. The petitioner was married to the deceased lady in the year 2005 and she was found dead under mysterious circumstances in the parental house of the petitioner. Either by strangulation or having been burnt neither of the circumstances is being explained by the petitioner, who is the husband. Charges having been framed and prosecution witnesses are being examined. Learned counsel for the informant informs this Court that three witnesses have already been examined and they have supported the case of unnatural death and allegations of dowry demand and cruelty before death. Informant is yet to be examined. In my view, it is not a proper case for grant of bail at this stage. In case, the informant is not examined as prosecution witness within next two months, petitioner would be at liberty to file a fresh bail application before the trial Court and in case the informant is examined then the petitioner would also have a liberty to move a fresh bail 2 application. The trial Court would then to deal with it taking into account the evidence brought on record so far and pass order in accordance with law. With this observation, this application is dismissed. Trivedi/ (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)