c f ?<?s2-— IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURB AT BILASPUR (C.G.) PETITIONER: W.P.No.......^.^;........./200jS 1 .i^Budhnath Sai Paikra S/o Shri Sobhan Sai, ./y^ .. Aged 36 year's Working as L.D.T. (Tribal ff)'-"^' ..•• Department) at Govt. Primary School, Sako, ...-• ^' c€^f^' ^'^K^' ..-^/ R/0 Sikinna, Tahsil - Kunkuri, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 'K' •^' .i? KESPONDENTS VERSUS ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary Tribal Welfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) t ^y.\ ' l -oV^ ^<*S'y\ ^ < "c??"" 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare /dy<v' ^"" ^" —"""-—' ^» Department, Pt.Ravishankar University cainpus, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Asst. Commissioner, ^' .WAN^ ^ iitj^^ ,:._^^ ^ ^~:^: ^ ^.aA ^9:N%? ^ // Tribal Welfare Department Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) ^';QS]W/ ''•^wS'y'S^ PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/2^7 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRBCTION/ORDEat OF UKE NTURE ETC:- XI-HC-78 3n^T?n'R-<i«b (raraTR?Tsb*iiqi e!")pal 'rt; 'f *TT*t<?rTSh*1I<*l 3:^''<ii<(i<i«,®Tnwis,ftciKiy ^^.^-L^t ^&S/f^)- ^ 200 siictwrag? ('^fg^tr) eTtnwtite'aTi^r 19-1-2007 Mr. R.S.Patel, Mr. Ravl Mr. Rajendra Tripathl, Mabeshwari, Mr. Rsrtiul Jha arri courtsel fbr the peUtloner(s). GovemNient Advocate and Mr. Safish Mr. Sushll Dubey, Gupta, Deputy Govemmen|t Advocate for die State/respondents. qii<<fa<fl-t ii*i<iTffte^l'<Ritrii< ^aiRtirsn^T counsel appearing for the parUes, the lof. .. Wrtt Petition (S.) No.262 of 2007 in Wrth the consent of teametl matter is heard flnally and dispos^d Common order dictated lih open Court, passed separately. A copy of this order be pla|ced on the record of the connectedwrit peUtions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge P.T.O. k HISH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BU-^SPUR SINGLEBENCH : HON'HLE MR. ^TISH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. Petitioners WRIT PETITION (S.t N0^82 OF 2007 Sundw LalPatel and anottier versus Respondents : State <rf Chhattl^arh and ottiers PeUtioner WRIT PETmON (S.) N0.263 OF 2B87 Puna Ram Sahu versus Respondents : State Govfc of CWtatttegaihandoUiers PeSBoner WRff PETITION (S.l N0.264 OF 2007 Ranr Kunar Satame vereus Resoondents : State Oovt. ofGhhatfegarti andothas WRIT PETmON (S.i NO^eSOF 28W Petitioner : Hemant KumarSalam» Versus Respondents : StateQovt.ofChhattl^arftandoUiers PetJtioner wrar PETITIQIN (s.i NO^BS opzooy Budhnath Sa! Paikra versus Reseondents : Starte of ChhErtfegarttand ottiera wrar pETmoN <s.i NO^S? OF 2007 <L PetiUoner : Madan Lal Sahu -/- versus Respondents : StateofChhaUtegaittandothere Petifoner WRIT PETITION (S.1 N0^89 OF 2«>7 PHamberPatel versus Resoondents : aatetrfChhattisgaitiandrthers Petitioner WRIT PETmON(S.)NO^yOQF 2007 Trinsrth Gtraud»ary versus Respondents : StBtetrfGhhattisgsBhanAothers r Priitioner WRITPETITION (S.t IW.281 OF 2W7 Snrt. DeepU ^irawal veraus ResDondents : StateorChliatBsgarhMidothere Present : Mr. R.S-Patd, Mr. Ravl Maheshwari, h4r. Rahul Jha and Mr. Rajendra Tripathl, counsel for the petitioner(9). Mr. Sushil Dubey, Government A^ocate and Mr. Satish Gupta, Deputy Govemment Advocate forthe State/respondents. ORDER (Passed on 19th Day of January, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for »iepariias joinBy suhmit thatthe facts and quesfion <rf law involved in the prssent b^h of writ petiUons are squarely covered by the decision ofthisCourtinthe casa of Yashwant Kumar Bhsrwhwrf vs. 1unfc<M( Cnfporattofl, Dy»ar toHi anoithei'. 2. In subsequent cases, is., Writ PetiUan (S.) hto.4130of 2005 (Sopesft KumarVwma v8. The State Sovt of efcftafffagw* aml anottiw) and other connected matters, ctecided by this Court en 15-12-2006, pursuant to tha meino dated SB-1-1995, issued by the Secretaty, Board of Secondary Educafion, Bhopal andlfte prospeclus aS DiplCTna in Education Examlnatian, it was clarified that ttie nomenclatureof the Basic Training InsUtute, i.e., B.T.I. has been 1 4 changpd and renamal as Diptcwna in Educallon, l.e., Dfd. Accordingty, the D.Ed. eertificate hoktBis are atse coverect by ttr decision in Writ Petitfon (S.) lsto.4130 of 2tX®(Goipesft KumarVwma vs. The Sfefe GoW. ofChhattsgwh aocfanoftei) (Supra). 3. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petitians are disposed of in terms <rf ttie declsion of this Court f»the matter <rf Yashwait KiimarBhaiwfwa^ (Supra), subject to verification of Ure firet as to whether the peBtioners have acqulred B.EdJB.T.t./D.Ed. CerBficates at Iheirown expenses as per ths ciroularsdatad 24-12- 1998 and 1-3-1999 and further vi*iether they hava been p»ld tffo adwsawe increments or not. No ordw as to costs. Oopal 4. A copy of this order be ptaced en ttie record of the connected writpetiUons. _^_———--— — Sd/- SarishK. Agnihotn Judge 1 2006(11)MPJR-GS96 1