IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 29TH OCTOBER 2010 / 7TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 32942 of 2010(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- S.SATHEESH CHANDRAN, S/O.K.SUBRAMANYA PILLAI, AGED 52 YEARS, RESIDING AT FLAT NO.401, BLOCK NO.2, EASLAND ENCLAVE, ELAMKULAM, KOCHI-682020. BY ADV. SRI.M.HARISHARMA RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MAVELI BHAVAN, GANDHI NAGAR, KOCHI-20. 2. PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, (MANAGER TEA & BRANDED PRODUCTS), KERALA STATE CIVIL SPPLIES CORPORATION LTD., MAVELI BHAVAN, GANDHI NAGAR, KOCHI-20. 3. VIGILANCE OFFICER, APPELLATE AUTHORITY (R.I.ACT), KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD., MAVELI BHAVAN, GANDHI NAGAR, KOCHI-20. ADV. SMT.MOLLY JACOB,SC,SUPPLYCO FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 32942 OF 2010 (P) ===================== Dated this the 29th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P9 order passed by the Appellate Authority under the Right to Information Act directing the Information Officer to furnish certain information sought for by a third party from the 1st respondent. 2. In my view, if the petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P9, he is entitled to prefer appeal under Section 19 of the Right to Information Act, 2005. Therefore, leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy available under the Act, the writ petition is disposed of. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp