1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.101 OF 2009 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.610 OF 2008 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1224 OF 2009 M/s.Leo Shipping Pvt. Ltd. ..Appellant V/s. Sateesh Laxman Huded ..Respondent Mr.K.H.Mody i/b.M/s.S.Pathak & Co., Advocate, for the Appellant Mr.S.V.Lad, Advocate, for the Respondent CORAM : P.B.MAJMUDAR R.M.SAVANT, JJ. DATE : 24TH APRIL, 2009 P.C. . Considering the fact that the appellant has already deposited the amount of Rs.5,00,000/- as directed by the learned Single Judge of this Court, we do not find any reason to interfere with the said order. Hence, the above Appeal is dismissed. In our view, looking to the serious dispute involved in the matter, the order of withdrawal 2 should not have been passed. The learned counsel for the respondent states that the respondent will not withdraw the said amount. While confirming the order of asking the appellant to deposit an amount of Rs.5,00,000/-, the order allowing the respondent to withdraw the said amount is set aside and the said amount will remain deposited. The Prothonotary and Senior Master is directed to invest the said amount in any Nationalized Bank so that the amount will not remain without fetching interest. The said deposit shall be subject to the result of the Civil Suit, if any, that would be filed by the respondent. In case, if no suit is filed within a period of three months from date, the respondent would be permitted to withdraw the amount deposited in the Court. 2. In view of the order passed in Appeal, Notice of Motion stands disposed of. (R.M.SAVANT, J.) (P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.) 3