sS3,0 \<?' \ raiu Petitloner Rsseondents COURT OF CHHATTiSSARH: BiLASPUR Writ Pstition (Si No. 3618 of 2008 J.P. Bhartendu, S/o. Mahimangal Prasad, aged 37 yeare, ocoupation - servtoe, presently posted at Polics Line Ambikapur, CG. Versus 1) State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Department of Home Ministry, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur,CG. 2) Direotor General o^ Poiice, Chhattisgarh, Civil Lines, Ralpur, CG. 3) Inspector Generai of Poiice, Police Headquarters, Poiioe Lines, Raipur, CG. 4) Inspector Gensral of Police, Range Sarguja, Distt. Sarguja (CG$. 5) Superintendent of Poiice, Distt. Saiguja, CG. fi/Vrit Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present Shri P.S. Koshy, counse! for the petitloner. Shri Arun Sao, -Govt. Advocaie for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 1181 day OfJuty, 2008) With consent of learned counsei appearing for both the parties, the matter is heard finally. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petltioner does not want to press this petition on merits, at this stage. However, the [ petitioner may be permitted to make a representation before the concemed aut'norities within a period of three days and the same may be directed to be decided, in accordance with law, within the prescribed time. 3) Shri Arun Sao, leamed Govt. Advocate appearing for the State submits that ifthe representatlon is made, the same shall be considered and decided by the concerned authority, in acoordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of frA'o weeks from the date of receipt of thQ representation. 4) In view of the foregoing, nothing suroives in the matter. Mr. Sao further submits that no coercive steps shaii be taken against the petitioner, tili the dis|josa!ofthe representation. . 5) Aooordingly, the petition is disposed of. No order as to oosts. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge