IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 11TH APRIL 2008 / 22ND CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 13126 of 2008(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ USHA, AGED 49 YEARS, BINDER, SREE SANKARACHARYA UNIVERSITY OF SANSKRIT, W/O.KUNJIKRISHNAN, KUNNUMPURATH, KIDANGOOR P.O., ANGAMALY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN 683 591. BY ADV. SMT.M.CHANDRALEKHA RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. REGISTRAR, SREE SANKARACHARYA UNIVERSITY OF SANSKRIT, KALADY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT PIN 683 574. 2. THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, SREE SANKARACHARYA UNIVERSITY OF SANSKRIT, KALADY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN 683 574. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION (B) DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI. P.K. VIJAYA MOHAN. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. A.J. VARGHESE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/04/2008, THE COURT, ON THE SAME DAY, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 13126 of 2008 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 11th April, 2008. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is an employee of the Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit. She apprehends cancellation of her appointment on the basis of Ext. P7 report of the Finance Department of the Government of Kerala, wherein it has been found that the petitioner is over-aged at the time of submitting the application. The petitioner's contention is that she was appointed granting relaxation in age for which there is provision and such relaxation in age has already been upheld by this Court in W.A. No. 477/2001 and connected cases. 2. I have heard the learned standing counsel for the University also. 3. It is for the petitioner to raise all the contentions available to her, including the applicability of the above said judgment to her case as and when the University proposes to take action against her, pursuant to Ext. P7 report. I am sure that the respondents would not take further action without affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. Therefore, making it clear that further proceedings pursuant to Ext. P7 shall only be after giving an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, the writ petition is closed. S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/