IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. APP (SJ) No.215 of 2011 RAMUCHIT JHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 01.03.2011. After having heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant who is the informant of the case and having considered the discussion of evidence specially that of doctor in paragraph13 what appears is that there are two assailants of the injured one, namely, Sant Kumar Jha is said to have dealt a Khanti blow on his head, likewise, and simultanelusly the other accused Sunil Kumar Jha is also alleged to have dealt a lathi blow on the same part of the body of the informant. However, there was a solitary wound caused by hard and blunt substance which was simple in nature. Even accepting the evidence, mere fact that the head was part of the body which was hit could never be sufficient to upset the order of acquittal of the respondents under Section 307 of the Penal Code. Merely some of the accused persons, i.e., some of the respondents have been convicted for offence under Sections 323 and 325 IPC may not inject 2 merit in the present appeal of acquittal. They are questioning their own convictions and sentences passed upon them. The view which was taken by the learned trial Judge as regards the failure of the charges under Section 307/34 of the IPC appears a reasonable view and in that view of the matter, this appeal is dismissed as of no merit. B.Kr. (Dharnidhar Jha,J.)