IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.12796 of 2010 Date of Decision : July 22, 2010. Usha Kiran Mochi .....Petitioner versus Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Aman Pal, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved at the allotment of LPG Distributorship for Bathinda location by respondent No.1 in favour of respondent No.2. The said distributorship was reserved for Scheduled Castes category. It is not in dispute that in terms of the allotment Scheme, the aggrieved candidate is entitled to submit his/her objection against the decision of the Allotment Committee, which shall be considered objectively. The petitioner has also submitted her objections vide complaint dated 8.5.2010 (Annexure P-3). She has now approached this Court alleging that no decision on her objections has been taken or communicated to her so far. C.W.P.No .12796 of 2010 2 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the same with a direction to respondent No.1 to dispose of the petitioner's objections against the allotment of distributorship in favour of respondent No.2 within a period of two weeks from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. It is further directed that till the objections are decided, no LPG Distributorship for Bathinda location shall be allotted in favour of respondent No.2. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. July 22, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE