../• •HIGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH AT PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WR!T PETiTION (S\ No. 760 of 2009 Smt Kalpana Agrav^S'W/o . Shri Vlpln Kumar Agrawal, about 45 years, Lecturer, .Govt. H.S.S. R/o Deepak Nagar, Dlstt..Durg(C.G.) VERSUS : i. State of Chhattisgarh, The Secretary Department of Educatjon D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Destt. Rajpur (C.G.) 2. The Director, Pubilc Snstruction, Ghhattlsgarh Government Ralpur Distt. Raspur(C.G.) ~ ' . , ' 3. The District Educatlon Offlcer, DIstt. Durg (C.G.) • PETSTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'bte.Shri K.Affnlhotri. J. Present: Shrl Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sunlta Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents.. ORALORDER (Passed on 18th day of March, 2009) i. Wlth the consent of'learned counsej appearlng, for the partles, the matter is flnalty. 2. Learned counsei appearing for the petltio.ner submlts that the petitioner Is entltled to grant of Swo' increments as she has obtained B.Ed. certificate on her own during the servlce period. Learned counsel further submits that the petltioner may be llberty to make a representation to the authoritles for grant of two Increments pursuant to the judgment and order passed by this Court in the matter of Yashwant Kum8i''Bhamdwaj v. Corpora&oa Dwg and another1 and W.P.(S^ No.4130 of 2005, ' 2006 (!i) MPJR CG 96 i 1 Gopesh Kumar Verma vs. The State Govt. of Ciihattisgafh and anotfter. ' ^ ., • - The State Government Is under an obligatlon to foilow the Saw settled bythss Court and it Is not necessaryto approach thte Court by each and eveiy employee when the iaw has aiready been settled by this Court. The empioyees, who are slmliariy situated and hav® not approached the Court, may be treated at par with other employees, who have approached thls Court. it is not necessaiy to approach thls Court for simiiar order. in view of the foregoing reasons, thls petition stands dlsposed of wth iiberty reserved to the petltloner, on, the request of counsei, to make a representation. if the representatlon Is flied by the petltjoner, the same may be consldered and declded, in accordance wlth iaw on its own merit as expeditiousiy as posslble, preferably within a period ofeight weeks from the date of recelpt of the representatjon,subject to verification ofthe Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotrl Judge AiKir