IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH JUNE 2010 / 26TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 18618 of 2010(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- EVEREST C.J., CHETTIPARAMBIL HOUSE, "SMART AVENUE", SOUTH JANATHA ROAD, PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI. BY ADVS. SRI.M.V.BOSE SRI.VINOD MADHAVAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. GREATER COCHIN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GCDA), REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KADAVANTHRA, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682 020. 2. THE SECRETARY, GREATER COCHIN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GCDA), KADAVANTHRA, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682 020. BY ADV. SRI.M.K.THANKAPPAN, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J -------------------- W.P.(c).No.18618 of 2010 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a person whose property has been acquired for the purpose of construction of the Jawaharlal Nehru International Stadium by GCDA. According to the petitioner at the time of acquisition, GCDA has promised the petitioner that proper road access would be provided for his remaining property from the public road, as per the decision taken on 15.2.2000. Petitioner therefore, sought from the GCDA action in that regard. In reply thereto, Ext.P4 has been issued to the petitioner. Petitioner challenges Ext.P4. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for petitioner as also the standing counsel for GCDA. On a reading of Ext.P4, I find that the same is only a direction to the petitioner to produce a copy of the assurance relied upon by the petitioner evidencing such assurance. I am not satisfied that Ext.P4, which is only a communication whereby the petitioner was directed to produce a document on the basis of which the petitioner claims a benefit W.P.(c) No.18618/10 2 from the GCDA can be interfered with. According to the petitioner there is no such document and therefore Ext.P4 has to be interfered with. If there is no such document, the petitioner has to inform the GCDA accordingly and take up the mater with GCDA to prove his claim appropriately. Without prejudice of that right, the writ petition is disposed of. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE. Sou.