1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 81 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 8 OF 2006 IN PETITION NO. 291 OF 2005 Mrs. Vasundhara Madhukar Joshi. ... Plaintiff. V/s. Vivek Vasant Joshi & Ors. ... Defendants. Mr. Ameya Tamhane i/b. Seema Sarnaik for the Plaintiff. Mr. Dushyant Pagare for Defendant 1. Mr. Pankaj Das a/w. Rahul Oak for Defendant 2. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATED : 2ND SEPTEMBER 2009. P.C. :- Perused the Motion and the affidavit in support. It is stated on affidavit that the name of the Advocate was wrongly shown and that is how the Suit came to be dismissed in default. 2. For the reasons set out in the affidavit, the order of dismissing the Suit in default is set aside. The Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b ) and (c). No order as to costs. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.)