IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.577 of 2006 SURENDRA OJHA Versus RAMCHANDRA SAH ----------- 4. 12.11.2008 Heard learned Senior counsel on behalf of the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court the impugned order having decided absolutely nothing, no effective grievance as a matter of fact could have been made by the petitioner as against the aforementioned order. All that is now sought to be contended and that too without enclosing the application said to have been pressed by the petitioner before the court below that the court below has ignored to look into that application raising the issue of maintainability of the proceedings purportedly under Order 23 Rule 3 C.P.C. This Court in absence of any material on record or any reference in the impugned order that any such objection was filed or was based is not in a position to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly, this civil revision application being wholly misconceived is hereby 2 dismissed. The dismissal of this civil revision application will not stand in the way of the petitioner to raise the question of maintainability at an appropriate stage before the court below. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/