^^.Ke^S^VS!S^1S ^6°V IN THE H3BH GOBBT @F JOBIGAIOBB AT BIL^SPUR (CG) WRIT PEETIQN HO.'st°2.'4-OF 2003 BSTWEBN (Siedi I<al BaghaL aged about S3 years £/o Late Shri Sadal Lal Baghel, Re-fclreiS Iiabour- Ma'tq/Gangniain, Publie ifor'ks DePartnient B»ietara« Bistriet Sarg, resids'tt oS village Pi'kari. ibst affiae and TAsil Banetara* Dis-fcriet Eurg (GG). 1. EBTITieNBR A K D Ihe state of Ctihat-fcisgarft. 'Birough -the arincipal Secretary » Public (toffks Department;, Mantralay, D.K.s.Building, Baipur, 'Edisil and Ed.stric-b Eaipur (CG)>. 3. 4. 5. 'Bie Gtaief aginear, Public WOF'KS Bepartmffit, Baipur, lehsil and Dis-brict Baipur (03). 'Oie Superlnfcending Englnoer, Publie Wbrks Bepartment. Sirg, TAsil and oistrict Surg (GS). ^%"' -y .ayr\^ i!%^y y^ :ai"i -»? i»:%-" 'She Executive Bnglnesr, •VSF':i^ Pi.tblic wrks Bspartfflent, < .^; Bamet.ara Blstriet; Durg (CG). <s* fe' '33^9 gato Bivisional ©ffieer, Publie lor'ks Beparteiait,, Sub Btvision Banetara District Durg (03). IScie Joint Bn.rector, 'Ciwasury, Aeaounts and Paision , Kaipur, •Eehsil aPd Qistrict Raipur (CG). :aESS®NBS8£3 WRIT PE'EtlIGN VSSSS ARTIGLES 226/22?' O? •IHB CCKSS'rlTu'nON „. %!• HIQH COURT QF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. No. 4024 of 2003 Chedi Lal Baghel 'v'^s'-^y^^-, Petitioner Chedi Vcrsus Respondents The State of Chhattisgarh & othera ; Hontslc Mr. Justicc Satish K. A^ii&otri, J Stui Rakesh Anfhoay, Advocate for tbe petitioner. Shri Viaay Paadey, Panel Lav»yerfor the respondents. O R D E R ( Passed OT) this 28th day of Pebniaiy, 2007) Thc folbwmg oixlcr oftfac Court is passcd by Satisli K. Agai&otri, J. 1. Admittedly, fhe petitioner was engaged as Mate in permanent Gang at Bemetera - Nawagarh Road in November, 1962 {Annexure P/ 1) on daity wages basis. Thereafter, vide order dated 6.7.1998 {Aanexure P/2) tlie serv'ices of the petitioner was regularized as per the provisions of fhe Work Charged aad Contiagency Paid Employees Ser.'ice Conditioiis Rules, 1975 w.e.f. 1.1.1996. The petitioner vvas paid salaiy on moathly basis in the pay scale of Rs. 775 - 1036. On attaining the age of superanuuation i.e. 62 years, the petitioaer was T-=>^y«3^ -E" -p* -T o i io onn''? JtCiLU.t^tA W.C.A. iJ 3-, 3L^i.^^\J^i. 2. Learued counsel for the petitioner submits fhat fhe petitioner has uot been paid pension and other benefits i.e. gratuity, arrcars of aunual increments aad leave encashinent. 3. With regaid to the claim of the petitioner for payment c.f pension, AT leamed counsel for tlie petitioner cited a decision of this Court dated 28til A-ug-.ist, 2006 pasaed in W.P.No. 4135/2004 (M.A.IIakim Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (Now C.G.) and others), and submits fhat the facts aad questk)ii of law involved hi fhe present petitioa is identical to fliat of in W.P.No. 4135/2004. Leamed couusel s gi! ee appearing for the reapondeiits/State concedes and agree with the aubmission made by leamed counsel for the petitioner. 4. Lcamed coiinsel for the petitioaer further submits fhat for remaBiing prayer of ofher benefits, liberty be granted to the petitioiier to make a ispreseatation to the conceraed aufhority and fhe coiicemed authority may be directed to decide the ssune iu acconlan.ee with law witliin a stipulated period. 5. In. view of fhe above, fhis petition desei-ves to be and is atlowed ia fenns of the orier fiated •2Bitl Aiigiisf, 20R6 passed m ?v'.P.No. 4135/2004, with the Uberiy aforestated. 6. It is directed tliat fhe admissible pension. shall be released withiu a period of two inonths from today as the petitioB.er has netired long back from sen'ice on 31.12.2002. No order as to costs. Sd/- Thakur Satish K. Agnihotri