IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.140 OF 1996 Jayant Dattatray Mhatre ...Petitioner Versus Purnaben Hemant Joshi & Anr. ...Respondents ...... Mrs.Helekar i/b Mr.V.P.Navare for Petitioner. Mr.A.R.Patil, A.G.P. for Respondent No.2. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. MARCH 21, 2006. MARCH 21, 2006. MARCH 21, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This Petition is of year 1996. Mr.Navare is the Advocate on record. Learned Counsel points out that Mr.Navare has now shifted to Delhi and practising before the Supreme Court. Even so, the Advocate on record is responsible to the Court, so long as he is not discharged by the Court. No formal application for discharge is made. Learned Counsel further points out that papers were returned to the Petitioner long back to make : 2 : necessary arrangements. If this is correct and Petitioner has not made any arrangement so far, the Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.