THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1829 of 2010 ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioner has questioned the order, dated 07.07.2006, whereby the first respondent cancelled the promotion of the petitioner to the post of Upper Division Stenographer. It is stated that along with the petitioner, 21 members were promoted and subsequently, the first respondent has cancelled their promotions. When there was a representation from the affected persons, the first respondent vide resolution No.6 of 2010 promoted all the candidates, who are similarly placed as that of the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner is that though he submitted a representation to the first respondent seeking promotion to the post of Upper Division Stenographer, the same was not considered as yet. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Wakf Board submitted that the claims of other similarly placed persons for promotion were considered and because of pendency of this writ petition, the case of the petitioner was not considered. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the first respondent be directed to consider the case of the petitioner also as per resolution No.6 of 2010 to promote him to the post of Upper Division Stenographer. As it is not in dispute that the claims of similarly placed persons were already considered and promotions were given to them, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition, without going into the merits of the case, with a direction to the first respondent to consider the case of the petitioner also for promotion in terms of Resolution No.6 of 2010, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Subject to the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 12th MARCH, 2010. Note: issue c.c. in three (3) days. kvni