1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4554/2008 Union of India and Ors. Petitioners Vs. Jayanthi H.Iyer Respondent Ms.Hina P.Shah for the petitioners CORAM : V.C.Daga,& Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar,JJ. Date : 11th February,2009. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioners. Perused Petition. 2] This Petition is directed against the order dated 21/11/2007 passed in O.A.No.541/2006 by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai whereby and whereunder the punishment imposed on the respondent Mrs.Iyer was set aside. 3] The learned counsel for the petitioners while placing reliance on Exh.G,(Page-186),a letter from J.M. Morgan Stanley Services Private Ltd.,said to be written by the employer of the husband of the respondent (Mrs.Jayanthi Iyer) that her husband had claimed medical reimbursement for the treatment of his father. In 2 addition to this, reimbursement was also claimed by Mrs.Iyer for the same treatment taken by her father-in-law. Thus respondent Mrs.Iyer was charged for claiming wrongful medical reimbursement and punished. 4] Having gone through the said letter,we must observe that this letter nowhere refers to the reimbursement claimed by the respondent in respect of the medical treatment taken by the father-in- law. No other material in support of the submissions is brought to our notice by the Petitioners. 5] In the above view of the matter,the view taken in the impugned order by the Tribunal is reasonable and plausible view. Learned counsel for the petitioners could not demonstrate any perversity or arbitrariness in the impugned order.The Petition is therefore dismissed in limini with no order as to costs. (Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar,J.) (V.C.Daga,J.) 3