CWP No.16240 of 2010.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.16240 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.04.2011 **** Balbir Singh . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Surinder Garg, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Monica Chhibber Sharma, DAG Punjab Mr. HK Aurora, Advocate for respondent No.4 to 7 **** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). It is not in dispute that the petitioner has since been paid his retiral dues on different dates as per the details submitted by the respondents, except the regular pension which has been sanctioned but is yet to be released. (2). The petitioner retired from service w.e.f. 31.01.2010. In view of the fact that most of the retiral dues have been paid to the petitioner in December, 2010 or thereafter, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the petitioner shall also be entitled to interest @ 7% w.e.f. 01.04.2010 till the date(s) of actual payment(s). The regular pension which has already been sanctioned be released within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (3). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. CWP No.16240 of 2010.doc - 2 – 07.04.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge