CRM-M No. 16025 of 2011 **** Jarnail Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another Present: Mr. Jagjit Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. **** This petition for anticipatory bail has been filed in criminal appeal bearing No.92 of 2008 titled as Jarnail Singh and others v. State and another pending in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Kapurthala. Learned counsel has argued that the petitioners had obtained regular bail during their appeal and were also regularly appearing but on 17.02.2011 they wrongly noted dated 11.04.2011 instead of 11.03.2011. Apart from that there has been no absence on their part. He has further argued that petitioner No.2 is an 80 years old lady. In my opinion it would be in the interest of justice if the petitioners surrender before the Appellate Court and move an application for regular bail stating all these facts. Learned trial Court is directed to decide the application for regular bail within two days after satisfying itself about the above mentioned facts. Petition is dismissed in the above terms. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE May 24, 2011 sunita