IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.36199 of 2011 ====================================================== Ravi Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== 2 09-11-2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the accused persons offered a scheme of making available the vehicles on payment of 55% and after five years the rest 45% was to be paid or the vehicle was to return, subsequently, it was found that the vehicle offered to the informant was stolen vehicle which was subsequently seized by Maharashtra Police. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the thrust of accusation is against Gopal Singh and the petitioner was one of them who convinced the informant about the scheme and others have been granted anticipatory bail. In para 20 of the application it has been stated that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 305/09 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Amrendra Kumar/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)