1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Writ Petition No.5900 of 2007 Swati Jagannath Salvi Petitioner Vs. The Civil Surgeon, Civil Hospital, Ratnagiri & anr. Respondents Mr.S.M.Railkar for petitioner. Mr.A.P.Vanarse, AGP for Resp.nos.1 and 2. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE, J. January 25, 2008 P.C. . Heard Mr.Railkar, the learned counsel for the petitioner who has succeeded before the Labour Court in Complaint (ULP) No.35 of 1998 and the learned Judge of the Labour Court directed not to terminate her service without following due process of law. This order has been confirmed by the Industrial Court in Revision Application (ULP) No.118 of 2006 on 5th April 2007. In the said order the learned Member of the Industrial Court has observed that though the applicant is directed to be continued in service, she has to make way for a permanent / regular employee as and when recruited by following the procedure laid down under the Rules. Mr.Railkar submitted that the 2 complainant has already filed the complaint seeking the relief of permanency and same is pending before the Industrial Court at Kolhapur. . It is hereby directed that the complaint for permanency pending before the Industrial Court will have to be decided on its own merits and the clarification given by the Industrial Court while dismissing the revision application need not come in the way in deciding the said complaint. Save and except this clarification, no interference is called for an in fact both the orders are in favour of the petitioner. Hence the petition is rejected summarily. (B.H.MARL