w HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONERS ^. RESPONDENTS WMTPETmON<SE)No.CTOof20 : 1. Anandiram Dhimar, S/o Late Duldiuraui Aged about 38 years, K/o Village Baidi, P.O.' Sajim^ Distt.Aaipur(CG) 2. Rani(diaran Yada^.S^ L^ Ram Yadav^^ilged' about 47 years, R/o ViUa^ Bakli, E.Q. Ra^im, Distt. Ra4wr(CG) ' 3. Santram Sahu S/o Late Bahunwn, Aged about 45 years, R/o Village Bakli, P.0. Rajim, Distt. Ratpw^ (CG) : ^:':.. :/'..; ^^^^ 4. Punamam Dhimar, S/o Lafe Thanuram Aged about 43 years, SA) Millage Araad, r.Q. fiasia^ Tafeil I^mi,Distt.Raipur(CXxt^^^^ 7 5. Bhuwan DhimM, &^) Taturam, Aged about 42 years, RA) ViHage Ara^ Rajim, Distt. Raipur (CG) , 6. Bholaram Sahu, S/6 Late Le<^aram Sdai, Aged about 42 y»ais, sR/o Village Arand, P.0. Basia, TahsaRajim,I>i^I^pur(CG)^ Kaliram Sahu S/o Late Sukhdev Sahu, Aged about 40 years, R/o Village Araid, P.prBasui, TalKil • Rajim, Distt. fiaipur(CG) 8. PaFdeshiDhnwStoI^Palturam,Ag^xt?oW years, RA) 'Village Arand, P.0. Basia, Talisit Rajim, Distt. Raipur (CG) 9. Pilin-am Sahu, S/o Shri Durjan Ram, Aged about 45 year^ Rto "ViUage Ai'Mid, KQ. Basin, TahsU Rajim,Oistt.Raipur(GG) ; s lO.HorilalTarak, S/o Shri MariraJdiaH, Aged about 38, years, R/o Village and Post Pond, Wirietea Nagar, ::: Distt.Raipur<CG). - :' '.. •,:.:':1.; ^;::h;:£^^ ll.Bhuvanlal Kewat, S/o Shri Mohan Sin^i Kewat, Aged about 52 years, R/o Village Kug(}a»^P.<])!.? Pond, Distt. Raipur (CG) 12.Pyariram Kewat, S/oShri Dhetaram.&swat, A^d about 52 years, R/o tViilage Kugd^ P.0. Pend, ::Distt.,Raipur(CG) ,..i.,, "„':, : :,' :.. :.•":::^';£1£.^ 13.Puraaik Ram Dhimar, S/o Shri KejUTam- Dhimar, R/o Village and Ppst Qffice Pofid, DistC Raipja* 7. 14.PaItanranrHalba, S/o Shri Jheturana Halba, Aggg about 48 ysars, K'o'Village aiid PcsitOflBce.Biaul, :Distt.Raipiu-(CG) ;,',,";. ': •.^:\^SS^ 15.Balthuram Sahu, S/o Shri Premlal Sahu, Aged about55years,R/eyiUageandPo^Off^ Distt..Raipur(C(^ ^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ 16.KomaI RamSaliu, S^Dayaram Saly^E/o Yil}s@ Kutena, PostOfflce PaB<toka, Distt. R.aqnn- (€©)„. VERSUS.',': . :;•• . -'r:;' :'''n:1'',.:.? 1. State of CKhattis^rh, Through fhe Seeretary;, Water Rssourees Dqrtt Maiitralaya, D.I^S. iasi sye^sst^^-: n Bha'wan, Raipur (C.G.) ;2./.lExecutive/:':'::'Engineer,',^^Water,;_ Departmeirt,Raipur(CG) :, , ; 3. Esiecutree Engmeer, W^^ Rssfi^^ DepartmeHt, Raiplir (CG) „ ' m 4. Sub Divisional Qfficer; PainJProject CaaasS, Sub- DivisKai Nb. 2, Panduka, District Raipur (CG). WRrTPETmONUNDERARTICLE226 OE THECONSTTFraiONQE: SB: Btan'Me Shri Satlsh K. Asnihotri. J. Presetit: Smt Eouzayaj^IirzayAdvGcate^fhepetition^^^ Shri Alpk BaksUi, ©overmnentAd\^ate^^ St^ ORAJLQIUMaft >Bi 1. ^d ^^ <Passed on 30m day of Jaimary, 2008) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitifmers submits fhat the petitionera, atflus stage, do not wantto pressthis petitipn oa merit. She fiirther submits that Ifae issue involved iri this 'petition is squarely coveredbylhe decision ofthis Court in W.P. No. 108/2005 (Crovmd Vs; Stateof Chhattisgarii and others)passedon 04.01.2007 (200? (2) CX3LJ 29). Leamed counsel a^earing for the State/respondents does not coiitrovert the said submission. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission ofthis Courtto withdraw this petition wilfa liberty to file representations be&re fhe authorities concemed, which mav be decided ia aecordanee with law, as expeditiously as possible, to whicfa leamed coansel aBpeariag fbr Ihe State/respondents has rio objection. Inview ofthe foregoing, tiie petition is dismissed as withdrawn witfathe above stated liberty. In tfae event, representations are made by Ifae petitioners, theymaybe corisidered and decided in acoordaace 'witfa law, as e3q>editiously as possible. No order asto costs. Sdi-^ s^^? Abo^1