IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1118 of 2010 Santosh Kumar son of Barhamdeo Prasad resident of village- Habibpur, Police Station- Parwalpur, District- Nalanda. … Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Rinku Devi @ Rinku Kumari daughter of Shiv Shankar Prasad resident of village- Shiv Nagar, Police Station- Parwalpur, District- Nalanda. … Opposite parties. ----------- 3. 09.08.2011 The husband-petitioner has preferred this revision application against the order dated 16.6.2010 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Nalanda in Maintenance Case No. 34 (M) of 2009, by which the petitioner has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.1000/- per month as interim maintenance to his wife, opposite party no. 2 from the date of filing of aforesaid interim maintenance petition i.e. 22.1.2010. Heard learned counsel for both the parties. It appears that it is an admitted position that the petitioner is the husband of opposite party no. 2. By the impugned order, learned Principal Judge has directed the petitioner to pay interim maintenance of Rs.1000/- per month to opposite party no.2. 2 A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of petitioner stating therein that opposite party no. 2 is married to another man during the pendency of maintenance case that cannot be looked into in this revision application. It is submitted by both the parties that the case is pending for final disposal and is fixed for argument on 16th August 2011. Considering the facts and circumstances stated above, in my opinion, no interfere in the impugned order at this stage is required. I.A. No. 1057 of 2011 at Flag ‘B’ filed on behalf of opposite party no. 2 for payment of interim maintenance is not required to be entertained at this stage. The revision application and also I. A. No. 1057 of 2011 stand disposed of. Kanchan (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)