BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Fourth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.14373 of 2011 1. KAVIN KARUTHIAH 2. JEYAMURUGAN 3. SIVAKUMAR 4. VELDURAI @ CHINNAMANI 5. RAJESH 6. VELMURUGAN 7. KALIKUMAR @ VELKUMAR : PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 to 7 Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE OVARI POLICE STATION, CRIME NO.203/2011, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. V.KATHIRVEL Senior Counsel for M/S. S.RAGAVENTHRE Advocate For Respondent : Mr. K.S.DURAIPANDIAN Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for offences under Sections 147, 148, 341, 324, 307 and 379 (NP) I.P.C. in Crime No.203 of 2011, the petitioners have come up with this petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of prosecution, on the date of election, there was a clash between two groups involving these petitioners and the complainant party. Both of them sustained injury. The injured have been discharged from the hospital. 3. The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners would deny all the above allegations. According to him, the petitioners never involved in the occurrence and only the de-facto complainant party are the aggressors. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. I have considered the above submissions. 5. Having regard to the above facts and circumstances of the case, there is also a counter case against the de-facto complainant and the stand of the petitioners that the de-facto complainant party are the aggressors and all attending circumstances and including the fact that the injured have been discharged from the hospital, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, but with conditions. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor, on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. sd/- 04/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VALLIYOOR. 2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, OVARI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. +1 CC to M/S. S.RAGAVENTHRE Advocate SR.No.38185 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14373 of 2011 Date :04/11/2011 NSV/8.11.11/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/