IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.10469 of 2011 SRIMATI SANDHYA JAISWAL - Petitioner/s(s) Versus RAMA SHANKAR DUBEY - Respondent/s(s) _______________ 3. 13.07.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ application is directed against the order dated 30.4.2011 passed by Subordinate Judge-I, Buxar in Execution Case No. 4 of 2006 whereby the learned court below rejected the objection under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the suit for specific performance of contract was decreed and on the basis of that decree the plaintiff respondent has levied the execution case. The petitioner filed an objection under Section 47 on the ground that since the alleged Mahadanama is not registered the decree cannot be executed. From perusal of the impugned order it appears that the learned court below considered the fact that this question had 2 already been decided by the Trial Court and first appeal is pending before the High Court. In such view of the matter, I find no merit in this writ application and accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. S.S. (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)