IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.605 of 2007 RAJENDRA PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4 05.09.2008. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has prayed for a direction to the police to file Final form, stating whether the persons named as accused in the complaint case no. 250 of 2002, under sections 364,302/109 I.P.C. have been arrested which was subsequently amalgamated with the police case being Rajauli ps case no. 23 of 2002, dated 17.2.2002 under section 363 I.P.C. to which sanction 302 I.P.C. had also been added later on. Before I consider the relief prayed for by the petitioner it may be necessary to notice some of the facts in brief. The petitioner filed the instant complaint case being complaint case no. 250 of 2002 on 22.4.2002 alleging therein that the accused persons are involved in kidnapping of his daughter-in-law, Pushpalata Devi. Soon thereafter the brother of the victim, Pushpalata Devi, namely, Narendra Kumar lodged an FIR alleging that some miscreants have kidnapped her sister. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that both the cases, namely, compliant case no. 250/02 and Rajauli ps case no. 23/02 were amalgamated and investigation proceeded. It is submitted that in course of investigation some persons were suspected and made accused in this case. The grievance of the petitioner is that he had named three - 2 - persons as an accused in the aforesaid case. Out of three persons the police has submitted its report against only one person, whereas no Final form in respect of other two persons has been filed. Learned counsel for the informant submits that needle of suspicion is towards the petitioner and some others also and the police would be required to investigate this part also and submit final report. In view of the limited prayer which the learned counsel for the petitioner has confined himself, this court observes that the police should conclude its investigation within a reasonable time and also submit a report in respect of the other two accused who are named in the complaint. It would also be open to the informant of the case to file a representation to police regarding possible involvement of petitioner in the case. It goes without saying that the police would conclude the investigation within a reasonable period, preferably within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the aforesaid observations this writ application is disposed of. Anilkr Sinha. (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J).