AB 3550/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C. UPADHYAY This is an application u/s. 438 Cr.P.C. seeking pre-arrest bail on behalf of 1. Rahim Uddin, 2. Hanif Ali, 3. Rashid Ali, 4. Monowar Hussain, 5. Mofijul Hoque, 6. Hatem Ali, 7. Ruhul Amin, 8. Khalil Uddin, 9. Jakir Hussain, 10, Bulbul Hussa in, 11. Bahadur Ali, 12. Akbar Ali, 13. Ismail Hussain, 14. Mojibor Rahman, 15. Mainul Hoque, 16. Rahim Badsa, 17. Ajimuddin, 18. Ajad Ali, 19. Joynal Abdin, 20 . Sakim Uddin Bhuyam. 21. Sahjahan Ali, 22. Saher Ali, 23. Najim Uddin, 24. Nasi Ali, 25. Rafiqul Islam and 26. Abul Hussain Mandal in connection with Nagarbera P.S. Case No. 66/2011u/s.143/147/148/ 341/325/326/353/ 307 IPC. I have heard Mr. A.S. Choudhury, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. B. B. Hu ssain, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. B. B. Gogo i, learned Addl. P.P., Assam. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners as stated in the FIR were not directly involved in the incident. They were only by stander s watching and observing the incident which took place in the place of occurrenc e. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since there is no involvemen t of the petitioners in connection with this case they may be extended privilege of pre-arrest bail in connection with this case for which they are ready and wi lling to participate and join in the investigation. Considering the matter in its entirety and the allegation leveled against the pe titioners, I am of the considered view that the petitioners can be extended priv ilege of pre-arrest bail in connection with this case. Accordingly, interim bail, granted by this Court in favour of the petitioners on 04.11.2011 is hereby made absolute. Bail application stands disposed of.