IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 4th day of October, ,2002 Criminal Misc. Bail Application Number 1036 of 2002 Order on the Bail Application CRIMINAL SIDE Vijay Kumar @ Banty @ Sonu S/o Shri Naval Singh, R/o Shivlok Colony, P.S. Ranipur, Distt. Hardwar ……………… Applicant Versus State of Uttaranchal. ……………….. Opposite Party. Arising out of Crime No. 512 of 2002 Under Section: 363/511/504,I.P.C. Police Station: Kotwali Haridwar DISTRICT: Haridwar. By the Court Hon. A.A. Desai, C. J. Heard Sri Lok Pal Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. The applicant is arrested for the offence punishable under section 354,I.P.C. From the text of the F.I.R., it is revealed that the offence is punishable under section 363 I.P.C. read with section 511 I.P.C. and further read with section 34, I.P.C. Learned counsel tried to attempt that the applicant’s name has been mentioned in the first information report. However, the prosecutrix also referred alongwith other accused, one person not known to her. Learned A.G.A. has said tht during investigation, the name of the applicant is figured. Moreover, there are four cases pending against him. He is habitual offender. In view of this, I am not inclined to grant bail to the accused applicant. The bail application is,therefore, rejected. (A.A. Desai, C.J.) 04.10.2002 A