1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 4745/2005 (Kalyani Dinkarrao Ambarkar VERSUS State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Ministry of Education, Mantralaya, Mumbai & 4 others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Mr. S.V. Sohoni, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. T.R. Kankale, Assistant Government Pleader for the R-1 to 3. Mr. Anand Parchure, counsel for the R-4 and 5. CORAM : D.D.SINHA AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATE : MARCH 24, 2008. Heard. We have already mentioned in our order dated 28.01.2008, the controversy in issue involved in the present writ petition. Pursuant to our said order, Mr. T.R. Kankale, the learned Assistant Government Pleader, on instructions, filed an affidavit of Education Officer in which it is stated that as on today, there is no vacancy at Bhugaon. It is, no doubt, true that in view of our earlier order dated 29.01.2004 passed in Writ Petition No.4112/2002, we have permitted the petitioner to make representation for redressal of his grievance by making certain observations therein. The grievance of the petitioner is that the representation of the petitioner was not 2 decided keeping in view the observations made by this Court in the order dated 29.01.2004 passed in Writ Petition No.4112/2002. Whenever the observations made by this Court or the directions given are not complied with or ignored, the normal remedy to the litigant is to move the appropriate Court for taking action against the concerned officers. Be that as it may. In the instant case, since there is no vacancy at Bhugaon, at this stage it is difficult for us to grant the request made by the petitioner. However, as and when the vacancy arises at Bhugaon, if the petitioner is otherwise eligible, this aspect would be considered by the concerned. With these observations, writ petition is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE APTE