1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 392 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders. Mrs. Indrayani M Koparkar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mrs S.D.Shinde, APP, for the respondent. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE AND A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 17/03/2010 PC: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. The petitioner has impugned the order dated 2.7.2009 passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Pune Division, Pune, rejecting his application for parole dated 10.3.2009. There is no dispute that the petitioner had applied for furlough and his furlough leave was granted for the period between 1.4.2009 and 30.4.2009. It is thus clear that when he applied for parole, he had also applied T 2 for furlough and that application was granted for the aforesaid period. There is no dispute that the petitioner enjoyed furlough leave during the aforesaid period. His application for parole was rejected mainly on the ground that when he was on furlough leave, he did not take care of his ailing mother and, therefore, his application for parole cannot be granted. In any case, the petitioner was released on furlough leave for the period between 1.4.2009 and 30,.4.2009 and, therefore, he was not entitled for parole leave for the same period. In the circumstances, we are not inclined to entertain this writ petition. The writ petition is rejected. However, we reserve the right of the petitioner to apply for parole/furlough leave in future and if he makes such an application, same may be considered in accordance with law. (A.R.JOSHI, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) 3 4