IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC No. 125 of 2009. Decided on 07.05.2010. _____________________________________________________ Special Security Bureau Volunteers Organization. …Petitioner. -Versus- Shri K.M. Chandrashekhar and others. …Respondents/Contemnors. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Vivek Singh Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge(Oral): Notices were issued to the respondents on 09.10.2009. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India has filed the reply in the Court, which is permitted to be taken on record. 2. The only direction issued to the respondents on 25.9.2008 in C.W.P. No. 469 of 2007 was that they may frame a scheme for the absorption of the petitioners in Armed Forces/Para Military Forces, including Special Security Burea taking into consideration the specialized training received by them for the last number of years. 3. In the reply, it has come that the respondents have made all out efforts to frame the scheme, but owing to the practical difficulties in framing the scheme, it could not be framed. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.No. It was for the respondents to frame or not to frame the scheme by weighing all the pros and cons. Since sincere efforts have been made by the respondent to frame the scheme, there is no willful disobedience on the part of the respondents. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge May 07, 2010. (bhupender)