c C QxLAm Mm. WWII /2011 Petitioner P.V.S. Nagesh, age 48 years. Son of Shri Pattabhi Ram, ‘ Resident of c-6, Green Vauey, Vishal Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) ‘ Versus ‘ Hori Lal Dewangan Son of Shri Jagdish Ram R/o. Near Water Tank, Santoshi Nagar, Khamtarai, Raipur (C.G.). 4 APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 4826:CRIMINALV z PROCEDURE CODE 1973 ‘ HH R y J, ’ . r .m v ‘ , ‘ ..... 4‘ h mmm ammw’W a _ B Hori’ble Shri Manindra Moha S n ‘ hrivastava J. rya nt Mishra, counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petlt ner submits that as In number of s: cases a View has been taken that ag inst the order taking cognizance and Issuing process revrsron rs not mamta able The petitioner has med this pet ion under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. againstthe ordertaking cognizance b the learned Magistrate. This Court in the casee K. L. Patel vs. H m Singh Rathiya and others 08-2011) and San! Kumar Shukla Mown and ano er (CrM P No 33/2009 decided on hat an (CrM.RNp.253/2011 decided on ’ ‘ nd two others v emedy of' ‘fllin> revisionqpetrti “r o exceptional circumstances to invoke ‘urisdiction under Section 482 of the V~“Céde; at this stage. ‘ ’ Accordingly, this petition is ti ally disposed off giving liberty to the petitioner to file revision before the ropriate Court exercising revisional jurisdictions Considering the fact that his petition was tiled on 2241-2011, the Court below while entertaining he revision petition and considering application for 'condonation of delay, f any, will take into consideration the aforesaid period during which the ettion remained pending before this Court t order taking cogmzance and issuing efore bar under Sectron 397(2) of wouid be maintainabie. Therefore, i pe ion as the petitioner may avail the i do not find any extra—ordinary or Turnane Sdl- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge a 1 a - i n r , , p i