FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1008 OF 2010 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ This petition is completely misconceived. The remedy for the petitioner, if any, will have to be pursued before the superior Court to which the orders of District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum, Gulbarga would be amenable. That is in the State of Karnataka. The argument of the advocate for the petitioner that the part of cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of this Court cannot be countenanced for the simple reason that it is the petitioner who chose to invoke the forum for redressal of his remedy of Gulbarga. If so, the decision of District Consumer Redressal Forum, Gulbarga will have to be carried further before the appropriate superior Forum within the State of Karnataka. Hence, dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to pursue such remedy, as may be advised. (S. S. SHINDE. J.) (A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.) Date:11.03.2010. rlj/