C^ lc^J^- < '.'MS^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. WP[C] Noi?JZ.2TT./09 Petitioners: Respondents: ^^.. ^i^ s-s'v- ^^^•^ ^'.^ \^..-- ^' /^''"L ?.ft ^A ^ Ci-..^ ^:-. ^^::m^s/^,.. ^^ -—-^ ^^ ^ ^ \.":^^ ^^1 L\ rsfi ^ ?^>- ~ ^^ 'y^^y Ram Das Kurana S/o Budh Ram, Aged about 32 years, R/o Ulkhar, Sarangarh (Tah) Raigarh Dist, CGState. Vs 1. StateofC.G. Through: Secretary, Deptt of Panchayat 85 Rural Development, Govt. ofC.G., DKS Bhawan, Raipur. CG State. 2. District Collector, Raigarh, Raigarh Dist, CG State. ^. Dy. Director, Panchayat 85 Social Welfare, Raigarh, Raigarh Dist, CG State WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION QF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITSfSI ORDERFSI DIRECTIONrSI ETC. L_.-_- ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fC) No. 7322 of2009 PETITIONE.R RESPONDENTS Ram Das Kurana. VER8U8 State ofC.G. & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTn'UTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'bie Slui Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Sto U.R.Koshale^/, Advocate for the petitioner. Sliri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawycr for the StaWrespondent. ORDER (•O-RAL') (Passed on 20m day of July, 2010) 1. Leamed coimsel appearmg for the petitioner, on instmctions, submits that.with the passage oftime, this petition has become iiitructuous. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side does not controvert the above submission. 3. In view ofthe above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having become intmctuous. —- Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit