IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 562 of 2008 Between: 1 JadiLalitha Kumari D/o Narayana 2 Ande Jyothi D/o narsaiah 3 Banoth Raghunath B.Ed. Student S/.o Lachiram 4 Chawan Khandu, B.Ed Student, S/o Bhikku 5 Chandavath RaviB.Ed. student S/o Chandavath Devu 6 Jarpala Srinivas, B.Ed. Student, S/o gangya, 7 Gugulothu Ravi B.ed. Student, S/o Balya, 8 jarpala Ravi, B.ed. Student, S/o Lalji, 9 U. Subba Rao B.Ed. Student, S/o gandhi 10 Gaguloth Ravi B.Ed. Student, S/o narayana 11 N. Soni Satya Sree, B.Ed. Student, D/o Vijayakumar 12 Bhokya Ravindar B.Ed. Student S/o B. Lal Singh (all are Students of 5th respondent College and Residing at Giddalur, prakasam District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Government of A.P., rep by its Secretary School Education Department Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner & Director of School Education Government of A.P. saifabad, hyderabad 3 The A.P. State Council of Higher Education, rep by its Secretary, Opp. Mahavir Hospital, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 4 Acharya Nagarjuna University, rep by its Registrar, Nagarjuna Nagar, Guntur district. 5 The correspondent & Secretary, hazarath Ameeruddin College of Education, Giddalur, Prakasam District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one inthe nature of Writ of mandamus, declarign the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing the impugned proceedings vide Lr. No. APSCHE/CETS/EDCET-06/Mgt. Quota/2006- 07/ANU-33 dt 08-10-2007 as illegal arbitrary, violative of Article 14, 21 of the Constitution of India and in gross violative of principles of natural justice and consequetnly set a side the same, and pass such other order or orders as this honble Court deem fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.M.SUBBA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI W.P NO.562 OF 2008 ORDER It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. --------------- G.ROHINI,J 28th APRIL 2009 *TSNR