THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI Civil Revision Petition No. 2549 of 2010 Dated: 25.06.2010 Between: B.Prakash, Ananthapur District. … Petitioner And G.Hanumakka and 7 others. … Respondents HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI Civil Revision Petition No. 2549 of 2010 O R D E R: The revision petitioner is the defendant No.2 in O.S.No.506 of 2002 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Hindupur. The respondents 1 to 5 herein are the plaintiffs and the suit is filed for declaration of title in respect of suit schedule property. The defendants 1 and 2 filed I.A.No.451 of 2009 under Order 1 Rule 10 of C.P.C. with a prayer to implead the respondents 7 and 8 herein as defendants to the suit. In the affidavit filed in support of the application, it was pleaded that the plaintiffs in collusion with the proposed respondents had created lease deeds in favour of the proposed parties and therefore, it was necessary to add them as defendants to the suit. The said application was dismissed by the Court below and aggrieved by the same, the present revision petition is filed. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and having regard to the purport of Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, which says that any transfer made during the pendency of the litigation should be subject to the result of the suit, the conclusion of the Court below that impleadment of the proposed parties was not necessary for deciding the issue involved in the suit cannot be held to be erroneous on any ground whatsoever. Hence, the interference by this Court is not necessary and accordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed. No costs. _____________ G.ROHINI,J Date: 25.06.2010 KLP