THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR Crl.R.C.M.P. No. 2567 of 2009 and Criminal Revision Case No. 971 of 2009 Date: 16.11.2009 Between: Dasari Subhash .. Petitioner/Accused And The State of A.P., rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court premises, Hyderabad .. Respondent. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR Crl.R.C.M.P. No. 2567 of 2009 and Criminal Revision Case No. 971 of 2009 Judgment: This Criminal Revision Case is filed by the petitioner/accused assailing the judgment dated 10.06.2009 in Criminal Appeal No.69 of 2008 passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Medak at Sangareddy, confirming the conviction and sentence imposed on him by the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Narayankhed, vide judgment dated 19.09.2008 in C.C. No.121 of 2007 for the offences punishable under Section 498-A IPC and under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Now Crl.R.C.M.P. No.2567 of 2009 is filed by both the parties seeking permission to compound the offence. T h e de facto complainant and the revision petitioner/accused are present. The de facto complainant stated that they have compromised the matter voluntarily and that she may be permitted to compound the offence and the petitioner/accused may be acquitted of the offences under Section 498-A IPC and under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act by setting aside the conviction and sentence imposed on him. In the circumstances, the de facto complainant is permitted to compound the offence and accordingly Crl.R.C.M.P. No. 2567 of 2009 is allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Revision Case is also allowed acquitting the petitioner/accused, under Section 320(8) Cr.P.C., setting aside the conviction and sentence imposed on him by the Courts below for the offences punishable under Section 498-A IPC and under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. ______________________ B. CHANDRA KUMAR, J. Date: 16.11.2009 Nsr