WPMS No. 267 of 2006 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. There is no representation for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Purohit, Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand. Mr. H.M. Raturi, Advocate for respondent No. 2. The petitioner, in the writ petition, has questioned the validity of the order dated 22nd December, 2005, whereby the Chief Revenue Commissioner has dismissed the Second Appeal No. 19 of 2002-03. Today, when the matter was taken up, Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of respondent No. 2, informs this Court that Mr. G.S. Negi, learned counsel for the petitioner has informed him, on the basis of the instruction received by him, that he does not want to press this writ petition. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. (Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.) Dated 19.07.2017 Shiv