c ¥ #2 & 3 %20.07.2009 Present:- Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advocate for the Decree Holder. Mr. Ram Gupta, Advocate for the Judgment Debtor. + Execution Petition No.284/2007 and Execution Petition No.290/2007 * These executions are being adjourned since institution on the request of the parties. On 21®*^ October, 2008 it was informed that substantial payments had been made to the decree holder and only the dispute as to calculation of some interest remains. The counsel for the decree holder states that, while according to the decree holder a sum of about Rs.5-6 lacs is due under each decree, according to the judgment debtor the entire decretal amount has been paid. Today also further time is sought to enable the decree holder to sort out the matter with the judgment debtor. These executions cannot be kept pending indefinitely for aforesaid reason. The decrees are of 2007 only. If the decree holder has any claims under the decree, the decree holder shall be entitled to apply afresh for execution. These execution petitions are disposed of with the said directions. EA No.592/2007 (for exemption) in Ex. P. No.284/2007 & EA No.598/2007 (for exemption) in Ex. P. No.290/2007. Upon disposal of execution petitions, these applications are infructuous and are disposed.of. July 20, 2009 SAHAI ENDLAW, J ReiKjo^q I b/o DHJ Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified