IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 239 of 2005 Umesh Kumar Gupta and others ……… Petitioners. Versus Uttaranchal Pay Jal Sansadhan Vikash and Nirman Nigam and others .………. Respondents. Mr. Pankaj Negi, Advocate for Mr. N.S. Negi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Joyce Irwin, Advocate for Mr. D.S. Patni, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate for Mr. Sudhir Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 3. Mr. H.M. Raturi, Advocate for respondent No. 4. None for respondent Nos. 5 and 6. Date of Judgment: 19.05.2010 JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. KHEHAR, C. J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners states, that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition. Learned counsel for the respondents states, that they have no objection to the acceptance of the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C. J.) 19.05.2010 19.05.2010 Amit