IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38764 of 2011 ====================================================== Raj Kishore Pandey .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== 2 23-11-2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is that on instruction of this petitioner, the complainant intervened in the agreement with one Dilip Kumar Yadav and paid Rs. 2,00,000/- to Dilip Kumar but subsequently, the sale deed was not executed. It is alleged against the petitioner that he is the witness to the agreement to sale. Considering the fact that the thrust of accusation is against Dilip Kumar Yadav, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna in connection with Complaint Case No. 874C/2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Amrendra Kumar/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)