iS»^ a»B»U!ililIi|.!t|g!| '1Ii' II 1:^1 F^'KS s.'esiasijo ser s.s ^^?7/ a.BS.S'.3'^^ &>/"^ rf<? Viv. ^~Q^'0"^'0"I M PSTtl9sa^ 50/~3^."""^py)"70 Wfmaa ^Q/Q/7^> ^' Ife^llC h&jK. l^ Vl?»k»j>)>.Sj [l jUhlh t.[l>l.>jb|lb >^^..^^.....^^.Q. ^ c^ 'Z)<3 aajB. ifeiiaa. B^UE tblhiB lUhlh >TiftlWI»J 'aiiftlP.®'h.Wlh.lb- te£ C2JH. 'blhtB l^llc. tb'll-bj Ityif ZZ-3H-IX HIGH COURT OF CHHATflSGARHAT BILASPUR DIVISIONBENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRi RAJEEV QUPTA, CJ. & HON'BLE SHRlSUNil; KUNSAR SSNHA, J. r^^~wp~ZP70^ffZi^p^wT Petitioner Versus Resoondent 's<in^£•^^njraj Pandey, Ambikapur . Stateof Chhattisgarh Present : Shri SumeshBajaj,'6ovemment Advocate forthsStats Order (4th July,200S) ; The followlng order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. This writ petition came to be registered on the letter sent by one - Brijraj Pandey, resident of Ambikapur, District Surguja, highlighting the pathetiGconditions ofthe residents of rural area of district - Surguja on account of the non-availability of basic medteal facilities and medicines. 2) tn the counter affldavit fited on behatf of the State, detaiis of the medicat facilities and the number of medicat staff available in the district of Surguja have been specificatly spelt out. 3) On due consideratlon of the facts narrated in the affidavit filed on behaff of the State and the chart annexed with the counter affidavit, we are satisfied that no further monitoring of the matter in thiswrit petition, now, is required. 4) The writ petition, thus, stands disposed of. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- SunU Kumar Sinha Judge ( i ^; ~^,^