IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.31385-M of 2010 Date of Decision:21.4.2011 Narinder Singh and another .... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. Ms. Amandeep Sibia, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR on the basis of compromise. Respondent No.2 is present in the Court. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 has submitted that she has instructions to state that respondent No.2 is not ready to make any statement as the terms and conditions of the compromise are not complied with by the petitioners. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for respondent No.2, the present petition on the basis of compromise is not maintainable. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. 21.4.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE