*1* 11.wp.377.2011.sxw skt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 377 OF 2011 Shri Dashrath Dada Jadhav ..Petitioner -Versus- Shri Nivrutti Shahu Barve & Ors. ..Respondents .......... Mr.R.D.Motkari for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents. .......... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 15TH FEBRUARY, 2011. P.C. 1 By way of the present petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 4th December 2010 vide which the learned Trial Court allowed the application for setting aside “no cross order”. 2 The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the learned trial court has grossly erred in allowing the application. He placed reliance on the judgment of this Court in case of “Balkrishna Shivappa Shetty Vs. Mahesh Nenshi Bhakta & Ors.” reported in AIR 2003 Bombay 293. *2* 11.wp.377.2011.sxw 3 The The scope of interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is very limited. Unless it is found that the discretion exercised by the learned Trial Court is found to have been exercised in the perverse manner, it would not be permissible for this Court to interfere with the same. The learned Trial Judge has given sound and cogent reasons for setting aside the order of no cross. 4 In that view of the matter, no case is made out for interference of the order. 5 The Writ Petition is, therefore, rejected. (B.R. GAVAI, J.) -