IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc.No. 19673 of 2009 1. ARUN KUMAR PURBEY 2. AVINASH KUMAR 3. SUNIL KUMAR PURBEY 4. SOHAN KUMAR PURBEY -------------------------- PETITIONERS VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR --------- 2 14.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that though they are alleged for committing loot even after entering the house and further demanding ransom but all the allegations are false, only in retaliation of deciding of mutation case ultimately in favour of the petitioners upto the Collector, so much so of the allegation is also made through a complaint petition, corroboration, if any, is by the complainant and his own men. There is no other agency at all to verify the incident which prima facie appears false even then petitioners are apprehending their arrest. I agree with the submission. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of - 2 - receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named four petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rosera, Samastipur in Complaint Case No. 496/2007, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI