IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5513 of 2007 1. Prem Bashki son of Mangal Bashki R/o Vill. Rangpura Tola ( Khatakani) P.S. Dhamdaha, Dist. Purnea. 2. Smt. Sulochana Devi W/o Maheshwar Rishi 3. Most. Radhika Devi @ Most Radhia Devi W/o Govind Rishi 4. Surendra Rishi son of Panchu Rishi 5. Anup Lal Rishi son of Nanhku Rishi 6. Mishar Rishi son of Bharu Rishi 7. Dinesh Rishi son of Bhudai Rishi 8. Chanchan rishi @ chanchen Rishi son of Yogeshwar Rishi 9. Bangtu Rishi son of Sitaram Rishi 10. Upendra Rishi son of Ram Swarup Rishi 11. Sadanand Rishi son of Siyaram Rishi All R/o vill-Mirganj, Musahari, P.s. Dhamdaha, Dist. Purnea. 12. Somai Kisku son of Hoppa Kisku 13. Tala Hansda son of Thathana Hansda 14. Hajjo Hansda son of late Bhajju Hansda All R/o vill-Rangpura Tola, (Khatakani) P.S. Dhamdaha, Dist. Purnea ---- Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar, Patna 3. Commissioner, Purnea Division, Purnea 4. Collector, Purnea 5. Additional Collector (Ceiling),Purnea 6. Anchal Adhikari, Dhamdaha, Dist-Purnea 7. Akhilesh Kumar Sah 8. Awadhesh Prasad Sah Both sons of late Ganga Prasad Sah R/o vill- Rangpura,Tola Mirganj, P.S. Dhamdaha (Mirganj), Dist. Purnea. 9. Dheeraj Choudhary 10. Ashutosh Choudhary Both sons of late Surendra Prasad Choudhary, R/o vill-Khagha, P.S.Mirganj, Dist. Purnea 11 Sarpanch, Rangpura North Gram Panchayat, P.S.Mirganj, Dist. Purnea. ---Respondents. ----------- 04 27.04.2011 Petitioners are settlees of land under the provisions of Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act (for short the Act). By the order impugned the lands which were earlier found to be the land of the landholder and declared surplus has been held to be the land of the stranger and accordingly deleted 2 from the ceiling proceeding. In that view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioners fairly concedes that petitioners cannot justifiably raise any grievance. It is submitted that they were in possession of the land since 07.12.2005, and as such they may be appropriately replenished. This Court cannot pass any order on the said prayer of the petitioners. Petitioners, if so advised, may approach the appropriate authority for such grievance and if any such grievance is raised, the same shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law. Sym (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)