IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN THURSDAY, THE 3RD NOVEMBER 2011 / 12TH KARTHIKA 1933 Crl.L.P..No. 741 of 2007() --------------------------------- ST.5716/2005 of J.M.F.C.-I,THRISSUR .................................................. PETITIONER /COMPLAINANT: -------------------------------------------- SOVEREIGN KURIES (I) (P) LTD. REP.BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER N.T.ROY, S/O.THERATTIL NEYYATTINGAL THOMAS,ARANATTUKARA VILLAGE,ANCHANGADI DESOM,THRISSUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.K.A.SREEJITH RESPONDENT(S)/ ACCUSED &STATE: ----------------------------------------------------- 1. GOPINATHAN,S/O.KARUNAKARAN NAIR, EACHARATH HOUSE,AYYANTHOLE. 2. STATE OF KEALA REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA KOCHI-31. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.LALIZA. THIS CRIMINAL LEAVE PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: STU V.K.MOHANAN, J. ------------------------------- Crl.L.P.No.741 of 2007 & Crl.M.A.No.6796 of 2011 ------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of November, 2011. O R D E R Though another learned Judge of this Court by an order dated 2.11.2007 allowed the leave petition on condition of depositing a sum of Rs.1,000/- in the Legal Services Committee of the High Court, within one month from that date, no payment is made and no receipt is produced before this Court. As per the above order, the payment of cost is a condition precedent to grant the leave petition. It is made clear in the above order itself that the leave petition will stands allowed only on production of receipt of the payment. As the petitioner has miserably failed to satisfy the conditions, which incorporated in an order issued four years back, and especially when there is no proper explanation for the delay of 1333 days, Crl.M.A.No.6796 of 2011 is dismissed and consequently the order in the above leave petition is vacated and the leave petition itself is dismissed. V.K.MOHANAN, Judge ami/