IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2479 of 2009 1. BIMLA DEVI W/o Sri Mithilesh Singh. 2. Mithilesh Singh son of Sri Ram Chandra Singh. Both R/o village Harikebel, P.S.Bhagwanpur District Vaishali. 3. Nandan Singh @ Nand Kishore Singh, s/o Late Raghunath Singh, Resident of village Dhanki, P.S.Lalganj, District Vaishali. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 13.05.2009 Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Bhagwanpur P.S.No. 101 of 2008 for the offences u/s 363 and 365 IPC. Heard. Petitioner No.2 Mithilesh Singh and Petitioner No.1 Bimla Devi are the son and daughter-in-law of the informant and petitioner no.3 Nandan Singh is brother of Bimla Devi. The informant alleges in the FIR that his grand-son Chandan Kuar who was the son of Late Dinesh Singh was kidnapped by one Durga Kumar of village Chandi and that the petitioners had assisted in the kidnapping. The informant suspected that the kidnapping was done for the purpose of grabbing the land of Chandan Kumar. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in this case the statement of Chandan Kumar was recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and he has stated in his statement that he had voluntarily gone to the place of Durga Kumar and had married Renu Kumari. He also stated that Duga Kumar was brother-in-law (Jija) of Renu Kumari. Chandan Kumar has also stated that he has voluntarily married Renu Kuari and that after marriage his grand-father (informant) had come and asked him to return to village but he had stated 2 that he will return to village with his newly wed wife only. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that vide Annexure-3 a compromise petition has also been filed in this case wherein the informant has stated that the case has been compromised and that Chandan Kumar is living happily with his newly wed wife Renu Kumari. Learned counsel submits that in connection with marriage of Chandan Kumar, some dispute had arisen due to which the FIR was lodged by the informant and that now the case has also been compromised. Mr.S.R.Haque, learned A.P.P. does not point out any other material. Under the circumstances, petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender within two weeks, are directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S.Case No.101 of 2008, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Jay/ ( C. M. Prasad. J. )