Crl. Misc. No. 32719-M of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- Crl. Misc. No. 32719-M of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:- 11.11.2010 Tara Singh & Ors. ... Petitioners. Versus State of Punjab. ... Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present:- Mr. S.P.S.Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioners. Gurdev Singh, J (oral) Heard. This petition has been filed by Tara Singh, Jarnail Singh, Manjit Kaur, Balvir Kaur and Gurpreet Singh, under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the issuance of direction to release them on anticipatory bail in FIR no.19, dated 15.2.2010 registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC, in Police Station Cantt. Ferozepur, District Ferozepur, till the conclusion of trial. Previously also application with the same prayer was made by the petitioners which was decided vide order dated 23.4.2010. The same is being reproduced below:- “Petitioners have filed this petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.19 dated 15.2.2010 registered under Section 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code in Police Station Crl. Misc. No. 32719-M of 2010 (O&M) -2- Cantt. Ferozepur, District Ferozepur. Petitioners were granted interim anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 9.3.2010. Learned State counsel has stated that the petitioners have joined the investigation and are not required for further investigation. In view of the above, order dated 9.3.2010 passed by this Court granting interim anticipatory bail to the petitioners, is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions incorporated therein. This order shall remain in operation till the decision of the application for regular bail, which is to be filed by the petitioners at the time of presentation of the Challan against him before the trial Court. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. Sd/- Gurdev Singh April 23, 2010 Judge.” As per that order the petitioners were to move an application for regular bail at the time of presentation of the Challan. Instead of doing so, they have come up with the present petition with the same prayer. Passing of any such order on this application will amount to the review of the previous order. No ground. Dismissed. November 11, 2010 (Gurdev Singh) tripti Judge