1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Contempt Petition No. 41 of 2007 [Dr. N.R. Khobragade Vs. State of Mah. & ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. Vishal Anand, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anjan De, Advocate for Respondent No.4. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 31st March,2008. 1. Heard. 2. The petition has been listed on board, as the petitioner has moved Civil Application No. 725 of 2008. 3. It is seen that while the direction no.1 is issued against the Taluks Inspector of Land Records, direction No.2 is issued against the Municipal Council. 4. It is not disputed that the Municipal Council is complying with its obligation. 5. The respondent No.5 has not complied with the direction of this Court. 2 6. The order does not reveal that any time limit was fixed. The petitioner has even not given to the respondent no.5 a notice that if the direction is not complied within any fixed period, the failure would result in lodgment of Contempt Petition. 7. In these premises, as on the date of filing of petition and as on today, there is no contempt. 8. In the circumstances, Contempt Petition No. 41 of 2007 is disposed of. Notice is discharged. 9. This does not preclude the petitioner from serving a notice on the respondent no.5 or anyone occupying the said office and filing a fresh petition, if occasion arises. Judge |Hedau| 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Civil Application No. 725 of 2008 IN Contempt Petition No. 41 of 2007 [Dr. N.R. Khobragade Vs. State of Mah. & ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. Vishal Anand, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anjan De, Advocate for Respondent No.4. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 31st March,2008. Civil Application does not survive. Judge |Hedau| 4