IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.219 of 2009 1. SHIV KUMAR SINGH 2. Satyendra Singh -Both sons of Late Harihar Singh 3. Suresh Prasad Singh S/o late Kamal Prasad Singh 4. Surendra Singh alias Surndra Prasad Singh 5. Vijay Kumar Singh - both sons of late Chandradeo Singh All residents of village _ Barhatiya, PS Vaishali, District Vaishali 6. Rajendra Singh alias Rajendra Prasad Singh 7. Satya Narayan Singh - Both sons of Basawan Singh All residents of village – Barhatiya PS Vaishali, District Vaishali 8. Shakuntala Devi w/o late Rameshwar Singh 9. Pankaj Kumar Singh s/o late Rameshwar Singh 10. Most Keshri Devi wife of late Yogendra Singh 11. Krishna Kumar Prasad Singh s/o Late Yogendra Singh -All residents of vill – Barhatiya, PS Vaishali, District Vaishali …Petitioners/Appellants Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Principal Consolidation, Bihar, Patna 3. Deputy Director, Consolidation, Vaishali 4. Consolidation Officer, Vaishali, District –Vaishali 5. Assistant Consolidation Officer, Vaishali, District Vaishali 6. Parsuram Prasaad Singh S/o late Sukhdeo Prasad Singh 7. Puspa Devi wife of late Awadhesh Kumar Singh 8. Ankur Kumar 9. Ayush Kumar -both s/o late Awadhesh Kumar Singh 10. Mukesh Kumar Singh son of Nawal Kishore Singh -all residents of village Barhatiya, PS Vaishali, District Vaishali …..Opp.Parties(Respondents) ----------- 04- 31.3.2010 It is today listed under the heading `for orders’. With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the case is taken on board `For admission’. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This application has been preferred for review of the order dated 2 14.7.2009, passed in LPA No.1188 of 1996, which was preferred against the judgment in CWJC No.9793 of 1994 (Parsuram Prasad Singh & Ors. V State of Bihar & Ors.), whereby the writ petition was dismissed by order dated 24.9.96. This appeal has been dismissed by order dated 14.7.2009. We agreed with the learned single Judge that the respondents could not acquire any interest in the disputed land, and the order impugned therein was set aside with the direction that the lands in question be recorded in the names of the writ petition. We are satisfied that no ground for review of our order has been made out. 3. The review application is dismissed. ( S K Katriar ) ( Jyoti Saran ) mrl