-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 718 OF 2004 IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 35 OF 2003 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 402 OF 2000 Ashwin Corporation. ..Appellant. Versus Karamchand Thaper & Bros (C.B.) Ltd. ..Respondent. Ms. Gayatri Sharma i/b M/s. S. K. Srivastava & Co., for the appellant. Mr. P. S. Gidwani i/b Mrs. N. G. Ghosh for the respondent. Coram : P. B. Majmudar & R. V. More, JJ. Date : December 19, 2009. P. C. : 1. It is pointed out by the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the parties in the matter that the dispute is settled. Consent terms duly signed by the respected parties along with their advocates have been placed on record. Learned counsel for the appellant, Ms. Gayatri Sharma states that she has explained the terms to her client and it is acceptable to him. She further states that her client is present in the Court. 2. On behalf of the respondent, learned counsel Mr. Gidwani states that his client is a Kolkata based company and none of the directors are here in Mumbai, but he has explained the consent terms to them, and according to him they have accepted it and they have signed the consent terms. -: 2 :- 3. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the consent terms. Parties to act accordingly. 4. Summary Suit No. 402 of 2000 stands decreed as per t he consent terms. 5. Appeal is accordingly disposed of. Refund of Court fees as per Rules. (R.V. MORE, J.) (P .B MAJMUDAR, J.)