HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (227) No. 2401 of2008 PETITIONER APPLICANT RESPONDENTS NON-APPLICANT Zila Saltkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Through: The Cltief Executive Offica:, Jagdalpur, Dist Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS : 1) The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Chliattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) 2) The Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Raipur(C.G.) 3) The Depirty Registrar, Co-operatwe Societies, Jagdalpur, Distt, Bastar. 4) Jairam Nath S/o Jaiiku Ram, Ex-Lamps Maiiager, Asulkliar at present R/o Chotedongar., Tahsi! Narayanpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) WRFT PETITION U/A 227 OF THE CONSTmJTION OFINDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agiuhotri.J. Present: Shri Prafull Bharat, Advocate for the petitioiier. Shri Y.S.Thalmr, Deputy Advocate General fbr the Stato/ respondent No. 1 to 3. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 28th day of AprH, 2008) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner-Bank submits that the respondent No. 4 was terminated from service after proper enquiry on 19.04*2005. The respondent No. 3, thereafter quashed the termmation order in an appeal filed by the respondent No. 4 on 09.01.2007 (Aimexure P/l). Being ag@aieved, the petitioner-Bank prefbrred an appeal before the Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, alongwith an application for stay ofthe order dated 09.01.2007 passed by fhe Deputy Registrar. The Joint Registrar dismissed the application for staying the order dated 09.01.2007, on 16.05.2007 (Annexiire P/2). The petitioner, thereafter preferred a revision which was also disirdased on 25.02.2008 ^ (Aimexure P/3) cn tte ground of non-maintainability. Thxis^ ttiis petrtion. 2. Shri Bharat, leam.ed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that after dismissal ofthe application fbr stay. the Jomt Registrar. respondent No. 2 is not deciding the appeal which was filed m the moath of Febmary 2007. The petitioner seeks a direction to the responderrt No. 2 to consider and decide the appeal expeditiously. 3. In normal course, this Court should iiot entertain suoh petition seekiiig a direction to the quasi-judicial authority for disposal ofapp^al. However, in the facts situation ofthe case, the petitioner is at liberty to make aii application before the Joint Registrar- Cooperative Societies, to gonsider and decide the appeal expeditiously. 4. In view ofthe foregoing obser^ations, this petition disposed o£ Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge - Aimt