c.^-x^^ g? S.B. (Service Matterl IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATnSGARHl WRITPETITION (S) N0. ^^ /2010. PETITIONER: Respondents ^'" X;'-N? .^w' ^^ipy av Smt.Kiran Thakur^ wife of K.K.Thakur, aged about 43 years^ presently working as Principal, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Gogaon, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, C.G. 2. District Education Officer, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER WRIT PETITION (S) N0.1897 OF 2010 Smt. Kiran Thakur RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri C.J.K. Rao, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on this 26th day ofApril, 2010) 1) By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to pay two advance increments from the date of passing of B.Ed. examination, on her own expenses, during the course of service. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the present case is no longer res integra as the same has been considered and decided by the Supreme Court in Asha Saxena v. State ofM.P. & Ors. as well as by this Court in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj v. Municipal Corporation, Durg and anothef2 and Gopesh Kumar Verma v. The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and another3. 3) Learned counsel further submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decisions (supra). Thus, the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to 1 2009 (III) MPJR (SC) 59 2 2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96 3WP(S)No.4130of2005 Ashok decide her case in the light of aforestated decisions, subject to verification of the facts. 4) Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representations, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with law and in the light of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Asha Saxena (supra) as well as this Court in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj (supra) and Gopesh Kumar Verma (supra), within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt ofthe representation. 5) In view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 6) Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihom Judge ^; ^,