IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1326 of 2009 Umesh Kumar @ Umesh Kumar Mehata, son of Sri Shambhunath Mehata resident of Mohalla Gabhtal Tarkariya Bazar P.S. Danapur, District Patna. … Petitioner. Versus 1. State Of Bihar 2. Puspa Rani wife of Umesh Kumar Mehata Daughter of Vijay Mehata resident of Mohalla Gobhtal Tarkariya Bazar P.S. Danapur District Patna at present C/o Vijay Mehata, R. K. Avenue Nala Road P. O. Bakipur, P.S. Kadamkuan District Patna. .. Opposite Parties. ----------- 9. 19.09.2011 The husband-petitioner has preferred this revision application under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act against the order dated 18th January 2007 passed by the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna in Maintenance Case No. 21 (M) of 2003 by which he has been directed to pay a sum of Rs. 2000/- per month to opposite party no. 2 for her maintenance from the date of the order and a cost of litigation Rs.2000/- in one lumpsum. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. It is an admitted position that the petitioner is the husband of the opposite party no. 2. The learned Principal Judge has considered the evidence adduced on behalf of both the parties and has come to the conclusion 2 that opposite party no. 2 has no means to support herself, whereas, the petitioner has sufficient means to maintain her and as such he has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.2000/- per month to his wife-opposite party no. 2 for her maintenance from the date of the order. Considering the facts and circumstances, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This application is dismissed. Kanchan (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)