1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3556/2010. with WRIT PETITION NO.607/2010. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ms.Surekha Mahajan, Adv. for petitioner; Mr. RS Shinde, Adv. for Resp.Nos. 1 to 3; Mr.AG Talhar, Adv. for Resp.No.4; Mrs.SD Shelke, AGP for Resp.Nos. 5 & 6. *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 28 th October, 2010. ... 1) The matter is extensively argued by both the learned Counsel. 2) Learned Counsel for petitioner has pointed, the appointment orders issued to the petitioner, effective for the period from 1.12.1999, which were extended from time to time, the 4th appointment letter dated 13.06.2003 illustrated the appointment of the petitioner to be on a permanent post. It was a case of management that there was reduction in strength of the students and consequently, the petitioner could not be given fresh appointment. 3) The challenge is also to the appointment of Respondent No.5 - Smt. Archana Rane. 2 4) Both the learned Counsel and respective parties have ultimately arrived at compromise recorded by way of pursis, duly signed by the petitioner; her advocate; Mr.Shinde for Respondent/management; President of the management; Mr.Talhar, Advocate and respondent no.4. 5) The pursis is taken on record. 6) In terms of the pursis, the matter is settled between the parties. 7) The petitioner will be allowed by the respondent/management to resume her duties effective from 1st of January, 2011. 8) Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the compromise mentioned in the pursis. 9) In view of disposal of the writ petition, CA also disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/