COURT’S ORDER WHETHER THE CASE IS OR IS NOT APPROVED FOR REPORTING {Chapter VIII, Rule 32(2)(b) } Description of the Case. CRIMINAL JAIL APPEAL NO. 49 OF 2005 Girish Chandra Tewari S/o Nardev Tewari, R/o Village Kahali, Patwari Circle Rana, Tehsil Ranikhet, Distt. Almora. ……………..Appellant Versus State of Uttarakhand ……………..Respondent Sri Harshvarhdan Sah, learned amicus curiae for the appellant Sri M.A. Khan, learned brief holder for the State Approved for reporting. Not approved for reporting. Dated : February 27, 2008 (Dharam Veer, J.) RESERVED JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CRIMINAL JAIL APPEAL No. 49 of 2005 Girish Chandra Tewari S/o Nardev Tewari, R/o Village Kahali, Patwari Circle Rana, Tehsil Ranikhet, Distt. Almora. ……………..Appeallant Versus State of Uttarakhand ……………..Respondent Dated : February 27, 2003 Sri Harshvardhan Sah, learned amicus curiae for the appellant Sri M.A. Khan, learned brief holder for State HON. DHARAM VEER, J. This criminal appeal, preferred u/s 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ( hereinafter to be referred as Cr. P.C.), is directed against the judgment and order dated 10.12.2004 passed by Sessions Judge, Almora in Sessions Trial No. 27 of 2003, State Vs. Girish Chandra, whereby the learned Sessions Judge has convicted the appellant-Girish Chandra under Section 304-B/ 498-A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter to be referred as I.P.C.) and sentenced him to ten years R.I. with fine of Rs. 3,000/- under Section 304-B of IPC and in default of payment of fine, one year further R.I. as well as u/s 498-A IPC for three years R.I. with fine of Rs. 2,000/- and in default of payment of fine, six month’s further R.I. was awarded. It was also directed that the substantive sentences shall run concurrently. 2. In brief, the prosecution case is that Smt. Champa alias Chandra, sister of complainant Bhairab Dutt Mishra, was married with the present appellant-Girish Chandra in the month of June, 1999 as per the Hindu customs. Soon after the marriage, the appellant started to harass the sister of complainant for the demand of dowry and was demanding Rs. 50,000/- in lieu of dowry. It was also averted that the appellant was not providing the food and clothes to the sister of complainant and also used to commit Marpit with her and whenever she used to come to her Mayaka, she used to complain against the appellant in this regard. It was also averted that several times, the appellant had ousted Smt. Champa from his house after beating her and on 16.5.2003, the complainant was informed over telephone that his sister had died by hanging. On the basis of this information, on 17.5.2003, the relatives of Smt, Champa reached at her in –laws house, but till that time, her dead body was under seal and blood was also oozing out from her dead body. With the same averments, the FIR was given by Bhairab Dutt Mishra to Naib Tehsildar, Ranikhet on 17.5.2003 at 4:00 P.M., i.e. Ex. Ka-1 and on the same day i.e. on 17.5.2003, the Naib Tehsildar, Ranikhet registered the case as Case Crime No. 2 of 2003 U/S 304-B/ 498-A IPC. On the basis of this information, the Chik FIR was prepared by Kushal Singh Kunjwal, Naib Tehsilar, i.e. Ex. Ka-3. (In the rural hilly areas of State of Uttarakhand, the Patwaris /Naib Tehsildars have been vested with the police powers). The Panchayatnama/ inquest report was prepared by Anand Prasad, I.O. / Patwari Rana, i.e. Ex. Ka-4. Ex.Ka-6 is the Challan Lash; Ex.Ka-7 is the Photo-lash and Ex-Ka -8 is the sample of seal for sealing the dead body of the deceased Champa Devi which was prepared by Patwari Rana, On the same day, the Patwari Rana prepared the site plan of the place of occurrence, i.e. Ex. Ka-9. On 17.5.2003, Anand Prasad, Patwari Rana sent a letter to In-charge Medical Officer, Civil Hospital, Ranikhet for post-mortem of the dead body of Smt. Champa Devi, that letter is Ex.Ka. -5. The investigation of the case was entrusted to Naib Tehsildar Kushal Singh Kunwal. On 17.5.2003 at 1:30 P.M., the post-mortem of dead body of Smt. Champa Devi was conducted, the post – mortem report is Ex.Ka-2. On 19.5.2003, the I.O. / Naib Tehsildar inspected the place of occurrence and prepared the site plan, i.e. Ex.Ka-10. The letters written by deceased Champa Devi on 26.4.2001, 2.8.2002 and 6.5.2003 were marked as material Ex. I, Ex. II Ex. III respectively and Ex. IV is the envelope which was written by deceased Champa Tewari. The I.O. / Naib Tehsildar during the course of investigation, recorded the statements of the witnesses and after completing the investigation, he submitted the charge sheet against the appellant u/s 304-B / 498A of IPC, that charge sheet is Ex-Ka. 11. 3. Learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranikhet has committed the case to the court of Sessions on 2.8.2003 under section 209 Cr.P.C. after complying with the provisions of Section 207 Cr.P.C. 4. On 7.4.2004, the Sessions Judge, Almora framed the charge against the appellant Girish Chandra Tewari under Sections 498-A/304-B of IPC. The Charge was read over and explained to the appellant who pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. 5. To prove its case, the prosecution examined P.W.1 Bhairab Dutt Mishra, complainant of the case, P.W. 2 Jasuli Devi, mother of deceased Champa Devi, P.W. 3 Dr. C.L. Maheshwari, one of the Medical Officers who conducted the autopsy and P.W. 4 Khushal Singh Kunjwal, Naib Tehsildar / I.P. of the case. 6. Thereafter, the statement of the appellant was recorded u/s 313 of Cr.P.C. The oral and documentary evidence was put to him in question form but he denied the allegations made against him and stated that his wife Champa Devi was ill and he snubbed her for not doing any work and thereafter he left house in the morning at 6:00 A.M. When he returned, he found Smt. Champa Devi missing from the house and then on search, her body was found hanging. 7. After appreciating the evidence on record and after hearing learned counsel for the parties, the learned Sessions Judge vide his judgment and order dated 10.12.2004 has convicted the appellant –Girish Chandra Under Section 304- B/498-A of IPC and sentenced him to ten years R.I. with fine of Rs. 3,000/- under Section 304-B of IPC and in default of payment of fine, one year further R.I. as well as u/s 498-A IPC for three years R.I. with fine of Rs. 2,000/- and in default of payment of fine, six month’s further R.I. was awarded. It was also directed that the substantive sentences shall run concurrently. Feeling aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment and order dated 10.12.2004, the appellant Girish Chandra Tewari has preferred the present appeal this Court. 8. I have heard Sri Harshvardhan Sah, learned amicus curiae for the appellant and Sri M.A. Khan, learned brief holder for the State and perused the entire material available on record. 9. To prove its case, the prosecution has examined P.W. 1 Bhairab Dutt Mishra who has stated that deceased Chandra alias Champa was his real sister and her marriage was solemnized on 19.6.1999 with the appellant. He also stated that whenever she used to come to her parental house, she used to complain him, her mother and other family members that the appellant was treating her with cruelty and harassing her for fulfillment of his demand of Rs. 50,000/- as dowry. He further stated that during four years of her married life, she had visited her parental house ( Maykka) 7-8 times. Out of these visits, she had come to her parental house 2-3 times without informing anyone, however he and other family members continued to send her back to her in-laws house by persuading her. Till the time of her death, she had two children, the elder was the girl who was 3 years of age and the younger was the boy who was one year of age at the time of death. Before 15 days, his sister had come to his house and informed him that due to non-fulfillment of demand of Rs. 50,000/-, her husband had ousted her. On the next day, he sent her sister back by persuading her and for the maintaining the relationship, he did not report this matter. He further stated that his sister was Class-VIII passed and she also used to write letters to him, some of which were available on record. He also stated that he had seen his sister while reading and writing and he also indentified her signatures. He also stated that in-land letters dated 26.4.2001 and 2.8.2002 were written by his sister and he also proved the same those were marked as material Ex. 1 and Ex. II respectively. He also proved the letter dated 6.5.2003 and its envelope which was written by his sister, i.e. Ex.III and Ex.IV respectively. The information about the death of his sister he received in the evening of 16.5.2003 on telephone on which he and other relatives, in total 7-8 persons went to the house of appellant. He found that the dead body of his sister was sealed by the Patwari and blood was oozing out from the dead body. The dead body was taken to Ranikhet for the purpose of post –mortem where he and other relatives also went, After that he went to the office of Naib Tehsildar where he dictated the FIR to his brother Girish Chandra Purohit and he also signed on it and the report was given to Naib Tehsildar. He also proved that report, i.e. Ex. Ka. 1. He has also stated that the appellant had committed murder of his sister for demand of Rs. 50,000/- in dowry. He has further stated that the in-laws house of his sister was about 23-24 kilometers from his house. This witness was cross-examined as length by the defence counsel but nothing has come out from his evidence which may create any doubt in his evidence. The evidence of this witness is reliable, believable and natural. 10. P.W. 2 is Smt. Jasuli Devi, mother of deceased, who has stated that decease Champa Devi wa s her daughter and she was married with the appellant. She was also stated that whenever her daughter used to come, she used to complain that the appellant used to commit Marpit with her for non- fulfillment of demand of Rs. 50,000/- in dowry. She has also stated that 10-12 days before death, her daughter came to her house but she was sent back to her in-laws house after being persuaded. This witness was also cross-examined as length by the defence counsel but nothing has come out from her evidence which may create any doubt in her evidence. The evidence of this witness is reliable, believable and natural. 11. P.W. 3 is Dr. C.L. Maheswari who has stated that on 17.5.2003, he was posted as Medical Officer in Civil Hospital, Ranikhet. On that day, in the afternoon at about 1:30 P.M., he and Dr. P.S. Kuarbj conducted the post –mortem of dead body of deceased Smt. Champa Devi who was indentified by Anand Prasad, Patwari Rana and Puran Chand, Village Pradhan Talli Kahali. In the external examination , it was found as under:- “The deceased was well built, rigor mortis passed off, whole body bloated and distorted, both eyes protruding out, cornea soft, tongue swollen and caught between teeth, lips swollen and everted, frothy reddish fluid trickling from both nostrils and mouth, both the breasts were greatly distended, blisters present all over body and filled with reddish colour fluid and gases, cuticle peeled off at places and skin underneath is reddish in colour, sphincters loose, faecal matter coming out from anus.” The doctors also found the following ante-mortem injuries on the dead body of Smt. Champa Devi:- “A ligature mark present encircling the whole neck, situated anteriority above thyroid cartilage parallel to mendibular line, extending to nape of neck on both sides. Width of ligature varies from 0.5 cm to 1.00cm. at different places. Echymosis present in S/C tissue under ligature mark.” “In the internal examination, the doctors found that membranes were congested; in the stomach about 100 ml. thick pasty material was present and decomposition was also started; the small intestine was greatly distended and was dark brownish red in colour, gases and semi-digested material was present and foul smell was also present; the large intestine was also greatly distended and was dark brownish red in colour and gases and faecal matter was present and foul smell was also present; the gall bladder was weighing about 1200 grams and was dark in colour and pulpy, and gall bladder was found empty; in the generation orgon, non-gravid uterus was found.” The doctors also opined that the deceased died on account of asphyxia within two days of the post-mortem. The post- mortem report was prepared by Dr. P.S. Kuarbi and he had also signed on it, i.e. Ex.Ka-2. It was also opined and that deceased could have died in the afternoon before 2:00P.M. on 16.5.2003. He has also stated that if the cord could have been tied in the neck of the deceased, then the above-said ligature mark could come and death could also be caused. 12. P.W. 4 is Kushal Singh Kunjwal, who has stated that on 17.5.2003, he was posted as Naib Tehsildar in Ranikhet. On that day, Bhairab Dutt Mishra had come in his headquarters along with his report Ex. Ka-1, on the basis of which he prepared the Chik FIR, i.e. Ex. Ka-3. Before this, on the report of village Pradhan, Patwari Anand Prasad had conducted the proceedings of Panchayatnama as per the direction of Naib Tehsildar Dasvi. He had also seen Patwari Anand Prasad and Naib Tehsildar Sham Bihari Lal while reading and writing and he also identified their signatures on the Panchayatnama, i.e. Ex.Ka-4. After completing the Panchayatnama, the Patwari sent the dead body for post-mortem to In-Charge Medical Officer, Civil Hospital, Ranikhet. Letter sent to CMO, lash challan, photo lash and specimen of seal was in the handwriting of Patwari Anand Prasad, which were marked as Ex.Ka-5 to Ex.Ka-8. The site plan was also prepared by the Patwari Anand Prasad, i.e. Ex.Ka-9. On 17.5.2003, the investigation of the case was entrusted to him. During the course of investigation, he recorded the statements of Bhairab Dutt Mishra and Smt. Rekha Devi and on 18.5.2003. he recorded the statement of Jasuli Devi and on 19.5.2003, he inspected the place of occurrence and prepared the site plan, i.e. Ex.Ka-10. On the same day, appellant was arrested by him and after completing the investigation, on 9.6.2003 he submitted the charge sheet, i.e. Ex.Ka-11. 13. Thereafter, the statement of the appellant was recorded u/s 313 of Cr.P.C. The oral and documentary evidence was put to him in question form but he denied the allegations made against him and stated that his wife Champa Devi was ill and he snubbed her for not doing any work and thereafter he left house in the morning at 6:00 A.M. When he returned, he found Smt. Champa Devi missing from the house and then on search, her body was found hanging. 14. Before further discussion, it is pertinent to mention Section 304-B/498-A of IPC, which are reproduced as under:- /304B. Dowry Death- (1) Where the death of a woman is caused by any burns or bodily injury or occurs otherwise than under normal circumstances within seven years of her marriage and it is shown that soon before her death she was subjected to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any relative of her husband for, or in connection with any demand for dowry, such death shall be called “dowry death”, and such husband or relative shall be deemed to have caused her death. Explanation –For the purpose of this sub-section, “dowry” shall have the same meaning as in section 2 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (28 of 1961). (2) Whoever commits dowry death shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than seven years but which may extended to imprisonment for life.] “498-A. Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty- Whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.” Explanation –For the purpose of this section, “Cruelty” means- (a) any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman; or (b) harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand. Section 113-B of Indian Evidence Act is also relevant to mention here, which are reproduced as under:- [113-B. Presumption as to dowry death – the question is whether a person has committed the dowry death of a woman and it is shown that soon before her death such woman had been subjected by such person to cruelty or harassment for, or in connection with, any demand for dowry, the Court shall presume that such person had caused the dowry death. Explanation – For the purposes of this section “dowry death” shall have the same meaning as in section 304-B of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860). 15. From the evidence discussed above, it is proved that that the deceased Smt. Champa had died on 16.5.2003 due to the mental and physical harassment caused by the present appellant to the deceased Smt. Champa Devi. The deceased Smt. Champa Devi had written a letter i.e. marterial Ex. I in which it has been clearly stated that the appellant had asked the deceased Smt. Champa Devi to get money in dowry from her parents, the said letter was written on 26.4.2001 and was proved from the statement of P.W. 1 Bhairab Dutt Mishra. Another letter i.e. material Ex. III which was written by deceased Smt. Champa Devi to her brother on 6.5.2003, which is just before her death. She has written the said letter to her brother and she stated that if he would not send Rs. 50,000/- immediately, then the present appellant would kill her. These letters clearly show that the appellant had demanded Rs.50,000/-in lieu of dowry from deceased Smt. Champa Devi and for that the appellant was harassing the deceased mentally and physically in both the ways. Except these letters, the statement of P.W. 1 Bhairab Dutt Mishra also supports the version of prosecution. In his statement, he has stated that his sister Smt. Champa was married with the present appellant on 19.6.1999 and whenever his sister Smt. Champa (deceased) used to come to her house, she used to complain to him and his mother against her husband. He also stated that she (deceased Smt. Champa ) also used to complain that her husband (present appellant) used to beat her and was demanding Rs. 50,000/- from her in lieu of dowry. He also stated that his sister had come 7-8 times within four years of her marriage. The statement of this witness is also corroborated by the statement of P.W.2 Jasuli Devi, the mother of the deceased, who has also stated that whenever her daughter (Smt. Champa) came to her house, she had complained that the appellant was demanding Rs. 50,000/- in dowry from her and from 10-12 days before her death, her daughter had come to her house and she had stated that the appellant had demanded Rs.50,000/- in dowry. In this way, the prosecution has successfully proved that just before the death, the appellant had demanded Rs. 50,000/- in dowry form the deceased Smt. Champa and for that, he had mentally and physically harassed her and also beaten her for this reason number of times. The deceased Smt. Champa had also come to her parental house and had asked her mother and brother that the appellant had demanded Rs. 50,000/- in dowry. Thus, from the letters i.e. material Exs. I and III and from the statement of P.W. 1 Bhairav Dutt Mishra and P.W. 2 Jasuli Devi, it is well established beyond reasonable doubt by the prosecution that the appellant had demanded Rs. 50,000/- in dowry from deceased Smt. Champa soon before her death and asked her to get this money from her mother and brother and for this reason, the appellant also beaten Smt. Champa Devi ( the deceased ) number of times. 16. It is not in dispute and its is also proved by the prosecution from the statement of P.W. 1 Bhairab Dutt Mishra and P.W. 2 Jasuli Devi that the deacesed Smt. Champa was married with the present appeallant on 19.61999 and she had died in her husband’s house on 16.5.2003 not in the normal circumstances rather she died due to asphyxia as proved by the post –mortem report i.e. Ex. Ka-2 as well as from the statement of P.W. 3 Dr. C.L. Maheshawari. Thus, it has also been proved by the prosecution from the statements of P.W. 1 Bhairab Dutt Mishra, P.W. 2 Jasuli Devi, post-morten report Ex.Ka-2 and also from the statement of P.W. 3 Dr. C.L. Maheshwari that the deceased Smt. Champa had died due to asphyxia within four years of her marriage and not in the normal circumstances in the house of present appellant. 17. From the discussion of the above-said evidence and facts and reading the above-said sections as reproduced above, the prosecution has proved its case against the appellant beyond reasonable doubt that the deceased Smt. Champa Devi had died within seven years of her marriage and she had died due to asphyxia, not in the normal circumstances, in the house of appellant and just before the marriage, she was mentally and physically harassed by the present appellant for Rs. 50,000/- in lieu of demand of dowry. In this way, the prosecution has proved its case against the appellant beyond reasonable doubt u/s 498-A/304-B of IPC and I do not find any illegality or irregularity in the judgment and order passed by the trial court for convicting the appellant under the above-said sections. 18. Learned amicus curiae for the appellant lastly argued that the sentence as awarded by the trial court may be reduced for the reason that the appellant is having two minor children and very old mother and there is none in his family to look after them, as such he prayed that the lenient view may be taken. 19. After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, it is just and proper and also in the interest of justice to reduce the sentence of the appellant. The appellant is sentenced to seven years R.I. with fine of Rs. 1,000/- and in default, he shall undergo three months further R.I. Under Section 304-B of IPC. The Appellant is further sentenced to two years R.I. with fine of Rs. 1,000/- and in default, he shall undergo three months further R.I. under 498-A of IPC. Both the sentences shall run concurrently. However, it is made clear that the period already served out by the appellant shall be adjusted after verifying from the records. 20. In view of the above, the appeal preferred by the appellant Girish Chandra Mishra is partly allowed. The judgment and order passed by the trial court stands modified accordingly. 21. Let a copy of this order be sent to the trial court concerned for compliance of the order forthwith. (Dharam Veer,J.) Rajeev Dang