IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE MONDAY, THE 7TH APRIL 2008 / 18TH CHAITHRA 1930 RP.No. 176 of 2008() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN OP.11605/2003 Dated 09/01/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS: PETITIONERS: --------------------------------- 1. P.A. BASHEER, POOTHANAL HOUSE, PAZHACKAPPILLY P.O.,MUVATTUPUZHA. 2. MATHEWS VARKEY, S/O. V.M.VARKEY, VELIYATHU HOUSE, MUDAVOOR P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.KURIAN GEORGE KANNAMTHANAM (SR.) SRI.TONY GEORGE KANNANTHANAM RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LAW DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SECRETARY, PAIPRA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, MUVATTUPUZHA, PEZHACKAPPILLY P.O. 3. MANI, S/O. AZHAKAN, CHIRAYIL HOUSE, PEZHAKKAPPILLY KARA, MALAVOOR VILLAGE, MUVATTUPUZHA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.BASIL MATHEW THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: O R D E R NO REPRESENTATION FOR EITHER SIDES. REVIEW PETITION WILL STAND DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT. SD/-PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE 07/04/2008 \\TRUE COPY// PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P.No.176 OF 2008 IN O.P.NO.11605 OF 2003 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 28th day of July, 2008 ORDER Sri.Kurian George Kannanthanam, senior counsel for the petitioners fairly concedes that if one goes by grounds a, b and c in the original petition, what has been stated in the judgment is correct. But the learned counsel drew my attention to paragraphs 29, 30, 32, 33 and 34 and submitted that the averments in those paragraphs will show that Ext.P3 is impugned on merits also. I find some merit in the above submission. Review Petition is allowed and the judgment dated 09.01.2008 is recalled. Original Petition is posted for disposal at 1:45 p.m. on 30/7/2008. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE JUDGE sv.