IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7151 of 2009 DR.SURESH CHANDRA GUPTA aged about 63 years, son of Late Indrashan Prasad, University Professor (Retired), Department of Entomology & Agricultural Zoology, Rajendra Agricultural University, Pusa, Samastipur, resident of “Indra Kusum Niketan” Mohalla- Modhopur at P.O.- Basudeopur, District- MUnger. Versus 1. THE RAJENDRA AGRI.UNIVERSITY, through its Registrar having office at Pusa, Samastipur, Bihar. 2. The Vice-Chancellor having office at Pusa, Samastipur, Bihar. 3. The Registrar, Rejendra Agriculture University, having office at Pusa, Samastipur, Bihar. 4. The Director, Sugarcane Research Institute, Pusa, Samastipur 5. The State of Bihar, through Secretary, Agriculture Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 6. The Director(Agriculture), Directorate of Agriculture, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 7. The Deputy Secretary, Agriculture Department (Secretariat) Govt. of Bihar, Patna 8. The Director (Provident Fund) Directorate, Finance Department Pant Bhawan, Patna 9. The Deputy Director (Provident Fund) Directorate, Finance Department, Pant Bhawan, Patna 10. The Treasury Officer, Samastipur, District Provident Fund Office, Samastipur 11. The District Provident Fund Officer, Samastipur. ----------- 2 29.06.2009 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, State and the University. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the only grievances as now remained to be redressed is towards the payment of the proceeds of the Group Insurance and the Provident Fund dues. It is further submitted that the respondent-University has already sent the necessary recommendation for payment of the aforesaid dues to the respondent nos. 6 & 8 respectively. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that for expeditious disposal of the grievances, as raised in this writ application, the petitioner - 2 - proposes to file separate representations before the respondent nos. 6 & 8 giving all the relevant details with regard to his grievances. In this view of the matter, it is directed that in case such representations are filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order, the concerned respondent shall consider and dispose of the same by a reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. Upon consideration, if the representation is disposed of in favour of the petitioner, the above respondents shall simultaneously issue necessary orders so that the grievances with regard to payment of admissible dues along with statutory interest for delayed payment, if any, could be redressed without delay in the light of the order passed by him on such representation. Notwithstanding the above, the learned counsel submits that for the remaining grievances, if any, petitioner may be permitted to file representation before the authority concerned. In case such representation is filed, the respondent- University shall consider the same in accordance with law. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)