HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Coram: Hon’ ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra, & Hon’ ble Shri R.N.‘ Chandrakar, JJ Writ Petition (C) No. 6976 of 2010 M/s. Ganga Constructions, Ganjpara, Durg (CG), through its Partner Shri Abhishek Shukla, s/e. R,P. Shukla, aged about 39 years, r/o. Shukla, Sadan Kamptee Line, Rajnandgaon (CG). Vs. Respondents. 1. State of Chhattisgarh throiugh its Secretary, Water Resources Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). Engineer-in-Chief, Wa'ter Resources Department, Sihawa Bhawan, Raipur (CG). Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Mahanadi Godavari Basin, Raipur (CG). (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.) Present: Shri P.S. Koshy with Shri Vaibhav Shukla, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 7-12-2010) Per Dhirendra Mishra,_J. 1. Heard. ' 2. Petitioner has filed this writ petition and pr’ayed for following reliefs. \ This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records of the said case. Petitioner w \H This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the letter daied 12-11-2010. iii) This Hon'bie Court may kindiy be pieased to direct the respondent authorities to open the bid of the petitioner firm taking the experience of thefirm as a whole and not of its partner firm separately. ) Any other relief as deemed fit and proper by this Hon’ble Court.” L p h t h ion earned counsel apearing for te petitioner submits tha tis petit may be isposd of with a direction to the repondt No. to decide the petitioer’s representation dated 10-11-2010 Annexure 7) in n ( P/ accordnce with law bfore any final ecision is taken in the tender a e d rcess initiated by tender tice dated 12-8—010 (Annexure P/. po no 2 3) r Y.‘S. Thakr, learne eputy Advocate Genera appearing for the rponnts/Sta sbmits tht if th petitioner files a esh representation ithi a eriod o thre da from today, he sa hal b considered and decided n ccordnce ith law before any decis is taken in the i aa w ion ener process initiated by Annexue P/ dated 12-8-2010, if the tender td 3 has lredy no ben finalied. aa t e z In view of th above submissions made by learned Deputy Advoc Generl for the State. nothi survis for adjudicatin in t maer. a ng ve o he tt Acdingly, the instant pettion i disposed of wth liberty to the petitioner cor i s i o file a fresh reprentatio along with copy of this order before th t esn e compent athorit — respondt No.2 within a period of three days from te uy en tay an h od, who in turn shall consider d decide the same, in accordance wit law before any decision is taken in tender initiated vide annexure P/3 dated 12.08.2010, if the tender has already not been finalized. Certified copy today as per rules. iv de sen 2 Shi u d D l esdete u a e fr Wn p f e ys t me sl e e ate . Sd/_ i Sdl— Dhirendra Mishra a Judge Judge i_ Raju