IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21322 of 2009 NAV RATAN LAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2. 16.9.2009 Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not, indeed, question the validity of the order which was passed by me in Cr. Misc. No. 11933 of 2008 on account of any error of judgment creeping into it due to either suppression of fact or any wrong judgment on the part of the Court. He has contended that soon after being released on bail in the light of the orders of this Court, the petitioner, who bears a long criminal history, is threatening the witnesses and, as such, there is every likelihood that the trial shall be subverted. If the petitioner could be so advised, he could place his application for cancellation of bail to the court below in the light of the judgment of the Supreme Court in State through The Delhi Administration Vs. Sanjay Gandhi reported in 2 A.I.R. 1978 S.C. 961 and the Court believes that the court below shall act in the light of law laid down by the Apex Court and dispose of the petition as expeditiously as could be possible within its schedules. The petition is dismissed. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)