IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER MONDAY, THE 30TH JULY 2007 / 8TH SRAVANA 1929 WP(C).No. 1932 of 2007(E) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- SARATCHANDRAN P.P., LECTURER SELECTION GRADE, DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS, THE COCHIN COLLEGE, KOCHI. BY ADV. SRI.K.M.KURIAN SRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE SUB TREASURY OFFICER, MATTANCHERRY. 3. THE PRINCIPAL, THE COCHIN COLLEGE, KOCHI. 4. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PRIYADARSINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.R.SREELATHA SRI. T.A. SHAJI, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 1932 of 2007(E) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: Ext.P1: True copy of order No.G.O.(MS)No.209/96/H.Edn. Ext.P2: True copy of order No.Ac.BV.2/145/99 issued by Syndicate Sub Committee on affiliation of Mahatma Gandhi University. Ext.P3: True copy of order No.G.O.(P)No.59/04/H.Edn. Ext.P4: True copyof order No.Ac.BV/2/779/04 issued by Syndicate Sub Committee on affiliation of Mahatma Gandhi University. Ext.P5: True copy of judgment in W.P.(C)No.26161/03 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: Ext.R1(a): True copy of the G.O.(MS)No.171/99/H.Edn. Dated 21.12.1999. Ext.R1(b): True copy of the letter No.5617/03/2006/H.Edn. Dated 20.3.2006. Ext.R1(c): True copy of the letter No.F2/1876/05 dated 26.2.2007 // True copy // P.A. To Judge jes A.K.BASHEER, J. --------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.1932 OF 2007 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of July, 2007 JUDGMENT Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader. 2. Having regard to Ext.R1(c) produced by respondent no.1 along with the counter affidavit, I am satisfied that this writ petition can be disposed of without going into the merit of the various contentions raised by the parties. 3. Respondent no.4 shall take a decision in the matter in the light of Ext.R1(c) communication sent by respondent no.1. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. All consequential benefits shall be granted to the petitioner in the light of the order that may be passed by respondent no.4. Writ petition is disposed of as above. A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE jes