\ \ 2L* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI . + CRL.M.C. 299/2011 & Crl.MA No.L222/2OIL SACHIN BHUGRA & ORS. ,.... PCtitiONCTS Through Mr.P.R.Chopra, Advocate with Petitioners No.1 & 3 in Person VCTSUS STATE GOW. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for State/R-1 Mr.Mayank Yadav, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MS. ]USTICE HIMA KOHLI ORDER o/a O2.02.20LI l. The present petition is filed by the petitioners under Section 482 of the Cr.PC praying inter atia for quashing of FIR No.58/2009, lodged by respondent No.2/complainant, against l petitioner No.1, her former husband and petitioners No.2 & 3, mother and sister of petitioner No.1, under Sections 49BA/406/34 IPC, registered with Police Station: North Rohini, New Delhi. CRL.M.C. 299 /20Lt Page 1 of 4 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified a-'/ 2. Counsel for the petitioners states that the marriage of petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2/complainant was solemnized on 9.11.2008 at Delhi. There is no child born from out of the wedlock. Disputes and differences arose between the parties immediately after the marriage, as a result of which they separated from each other on 22.3.2009. In December 2009, respondent No.2/complainant lodged the aforesaid complaint. In March ZOLO, petitioner No.1 applied for anticipatory bail. In the course of the said proceedings, the parties were directed to appear before the Mediation Centre, Rohini District t Courts, Delhi where the matter was settled and the terms of the settlement were recorded on 3.3.2010(Annexure-B). 3. In.terms of the settlement, it was agreed that petitioner No.1 shall pay g sum of {4,50,000/- to respondent No.2/tomplainant in full and final settlement of all her claims against the petitioners. It is stated that out of the aforesaid amount, a sum of {1,50,000/- has already been paid to respondent No.2/complainant at the time of grant of bail. It is further stated that two demand drafts bearing No. 029426 ,. dated L7.7.20lO(revalidated till 17.4.2011) drawn on Standard Chartered Bank, Janakpuri Branch, in the sum of {2,00,000/- & bearing No.204141 dated 2I.t.2011 drawn on ICICI Bank for the sum of <1,00,000/-, Janakpuri Branch, in favour of respondent No.2/ cRL.M.C. 299 /20tr Page 2 of 4 3 complainant, are handed over by the counsel for the petitioners to .respondent No.2/complainant, through counsel. It is stated that after paying the aforesaid amount, nothing further is due or payable OU petitioners to respondent tito.2/complainant. It.is also stated that a divorce petition preferred by respondent No.2/complainant was duly decreed vide judgment dated 30.8.2010, which has not been challenged by the petitioner by preferring an appeal before the Appellate Court. Thus the divorce has attained finality. 4. Respondent No.2/complainant is present in Court and is I duly represented through counsel. She confirms the fact that the entire amount has been received by her and hence, she has no objection to the present FIR being quashed. She further confirms that the aforesaid settlement has been arrived at of her own free will and volition and without any undue influence or coercion from any quarter. 5. Learned APP for the State submits that in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, he has no objection to the -l prayer made in the present petition being allowed l 6. This Court has heard the counsels for the parties. In view of the submission made by respondent No.2/complainant and in view of the fact that the parties have arrived at a settlement of their own cRL. M.C. 299 /2ott Page 3 of 4 t free will and volition and without any undue influence or coercion from any quarter, no useful purpose will be served by proceeding further with the aforesaid FIR and the proceedings arising therefrom 7. Accordingly, the prayer made in the petition is allowed. FIR No.6812009, lodged by respondent No.2/complainant with Police Station: North Rohini, New Delhi, and all proceedings arising therefrom are quashed. , B. The petition is disposed of, along with the pending application. J File be consigned to the record room. HIMA KOHLI,J FEBRUARY 02,2OTT mk cRL.M.C. 299 /20tI Page 4 of 4 ->