IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.12953 of 2011 Date of Decision : July 22, 2011. Gram Panchayat Village Kharabgarh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Garjinder Singh Chahal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Charu Tuli, Sr.DAG, Punjab, for respondent Nos.1 to 3. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 to 3 only at this stage. Ms.Charu Tuli, learned Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on their behalf. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, neither there is any need to issue notice to respondent Nos.4 to 6 nor any counter- reply from respondent Nos.1 to 3 is needed at this stage. The petitioner-Gram Panchayat is aggrieved by the repeated extension of time granted by the DDPO, Patiala in the matter of delivery of possession of the Gram Panchayat land in favour of the Gram Panchayat by executing the warrant of possession already issued in favour of the Gram CWP No.12953 of 2011 [2] Panchayat. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the DDPO, Patiala, to do the needful. The Deputy Commissioner, Patiala is also directed to monitor the process of execution of the warrants of possession and if so required, provide adequate police assistance so that no one can take the law in his hands. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. July 22, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE