IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 253 of 2005 (S/S) 1. Thakur Singh, S/o Swaroop Singh R/o village Murliwala P.O. Jaspur District Udham Singh Nagar. 2. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, S/o Ram Sharma R/o Village Harikishanpur, P.O. Alehpur Mohakam, District Bijnor 3. Vinod Kumar, S/o Shiv Nath Singh R/o Village & P.O. Dharampur District Udham Singh Nagar. 4. Teka, S/o Baldev Singh R/o Villagge & P.O. Surjan Nagar District Moradabad. 5. Pritam Kumar, S/o Ram Kumar Singh R/o Village Jafrabad P.O. Alehpur Mohkam District Bijnor 6. Mahesh Kumar, S/o Kishori Singh R/o Village & P.O. Surjan Nagar District Moradabad. 7. Kunwar Pal Singh, s/o Durga Singh R/o Village Harishanpur P.O. Alehpur Mohkam District Bijnor 8. Rajendra Singh, S/o Chattar Singh R/o Village Rajpur, P.O. Kisan Sehkari Chini Mills Ltd. Rajpur Puranpur Nadehi, District Udham Singh Nagar. 9. Chandra Pal Singh, S/o Shav Nath Singh R/o Village & P.O. Raipur District Udham Singh Nagar. 10. Vinod, S/o Kishori R/o Village & P.O. Surjannagar District Moradabad. 11. Satyapal, S/o Nathu R/o Village Dulahpur, P.O. Tanda Afjal District Moradabad. 12. Hukam Singh, S/o Ram Dayal Singh R/o Village & P.O. Sharf Nagar District Moradabad. 13. Tara Singh, S/o Kewal Singh R/o Village Jafrabad, P.O. Alehpur Mohkam District Bijnor. 14. Naresh Kumar, s/o Chiranjee Singh R/o Village Sahpur Jamal, P.O. Suawala District Moradabad. 15. Nripendra Kumar, S/o Om Prakash Singh S/o Village Kherullapur, P.O. Tanda Afjal District Moradabad. 16. Sunil Kumar, S/o Sher Singh R/o Village Ramuwala Seku P.O. Sharif Nagar, District Moradabad. 17. Charan Singh, S/o Jeeraj Singh R/o Village Rajpur, P.O. The Kisan Sehkari Sugar Mills Ltd. Rajpur Puranpur Nadehi, District Udham Singh Nagar. …………..Petitioners. Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Sugar Secretary Civil Secretariat, Dehradun. 2. Kishan Sahkari Chini Mill Ltd. Rajpur Puranpur through its General Manager 3. General Manager Kisan Sehkari Chini Mills Ltd. Rajpur Puranpur, Nehdei District Udham Singh Nagar. …………Respondents Shri A.K. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners. Shri C.K. Sharma, learned counsel for respondents No. 2 and 3. Learned Standing Counsel for the State Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J Learned counsel for the parties are present. 2. Heard. 3. By means of this petition, the petitioners, who are working on daily wages with Kisan Sehkari Chini Mill, have sought their regularization in service. In view of the principle of law laid down in Secretary, State of Karnataka Vs. Uma Devi, reported in (2006)4 Supreme Court Cases, Pg. 01, wherein it has been held that the workers on daily wages or the persons who get employed without undergoing regular selection process, should not be permitted to be absorbed or regularised against the constitutional scheme of public employment, this Court is not inclined to issue direction to regularize services of the petitioners, as such, the petition is liable to be dismissed. 4. The writ petition is dismissed. Interim stay order dated 15.03.2005 is hereby vacated. (All pending applications also stand disposed of). Dt. 16.11.2006 (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) S