IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS FRIDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2011 / 18TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(Crl.).No. 168 of 2011(S) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- PRABHAKUMARI, W/O. JAGADEESHANUNNITHAN, KANNAMANGALATH KIZHAKKETHIL, ENADIMANGALAM, ADOOR. BY ADV. SRI.ARUN.B.VARGHESE SRI.P.HARI SRI.B.UNNIKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT - 689 645. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHALISSERI POLICE STATION, PERINGANOOR - 679 535. 3. RAMESHAN, NEENDOOR VEEDU, PERINGANOOR P.O., PERINGODU (VIA), PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678 001. ADV. SRI.N.K.SHYJU FOR R3 GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SHRI C M KAMAPPU FOR R1&2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/04/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M. JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS JJ., - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(Crl.) No.168 of 2011 S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 8th day of April, 2011 JUDGMENT Joseph J., The petitioner is the mother of the alleged detenue. The illegal detention is alleged against the third respondent. We have passed interim order dated 31.3.2011. Pursuant to the said order, the alleged detenue was produced before this Court by the petitioner. The third respondent was also present. 2. We heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner handed over copy of the birth certificate of the alleged detenue. According to the same, it is noted that the alleged detenue was born on 10.9.1994, which means that the alleged detenue is a minor. 4. Today the petitioner has handed over a bangle, a chain and ear rings to the third respondent. The third respondent W.P.(Crl.) No.168 of 2011 :2: acknowledged receipt of the same. The said items were given by the third respondent to the alleged detenue. 5. The alleged detenue categorically states that she would like to go with the petitioner/mother and she does not want to go with the third respondent. The alleged detenue would say that she is keen on pursuing her education. 6. The Writ Petition is closed permitting the alleged detenue to go with the petitioner/mother. K.M. JOSEPH, (JUDGE) M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, (JUDGE) dl/