:1: :1: :1: HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLI. (M ) NO. 225 OF 2006. IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 45 OF 2006. Nalini N. Upalkar. ..Applicant. Versus. Nagnath M. Upalkar. ..Respondent. --- Mr. U. P. Nighot for the applicant. Mr. A. S. Sharma i/b Yadunath Chaudari for the respondents. CORAM: S. B. MHASE & CORAM: S. B. MHASE & CORAM: S. B. MHASE & SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DATE: FEBRUARY 21, 2007. DATE: FEBRUARY 21, 2007. DATE: FEBRUARY 21, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard both sides. Prayer clause 7(b) is not pressed at this stage. By this application the applicant is seeking a stay of the decree of divorce granted on the ground of cruelty. We stay the decree in terms of prayer 7(a). Therefore, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer cluase 7(a) and it accordingly stands disposed of. (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) :sachin/2007/nnm/..