HIGH COURT (WeHltfkTTBQAI&l AT BILASPUR D1VISIOMBENCH Coram_ HON'BUESHRIRA.tEEVGUFFA,C.J.& HON'BLESHRISUNtLKUMJWSlNHA.A APPELLANT (Petitioner) WntADDealNo.8*(2008 Smt. SanU Gafh, Wife of Manoj Kumar, aged about 25 yeais, occupation: Category-1 employee in S.E.C.L. r^tent of Jampara, Bail<unthpur(C.G.) ywstts RESPONDENTC 1. 2. 3. Gene»af ffila^yr. Manager, S.E.C.L Chiel Gerteral Manager, S.E.©.L.. Baikunthpur area, Ba{lain (xir (C^.) Go^l PraMd, aged about ^ years, oGcyiMUon: Dy. Chief Pereonnel Mansger, S.E.S.L.^ Baikunthpur area(C.G.) Smt. Mamta Toppo, a@ed dsout K) yeare, Sr. PereOTinet Offfiser, S.E.G.L, Ba^unthpur area, (©.G.) G.K. Srivastava, aged aboid 55 yeare, Oy. Chlef Pereonriel Officer, Churoha West, S.E.C.L. area, Batkunthpur (C.G.) WritADDealtMS2(1ioftheChtiattisdarhAm»attotte Division BeMcsliialtet. ZffiB® 20 Pr^ent: Smt. Anju Ahuja, I^FRed (WunsetfortheappeUfflBl. Shri Abhishelc Sjnttt, lean^^ e^^ respondents Nft 1 & 2, JUDQMENT (2SUIJURe,M08» 1 U t :i t?;??: M^- iin^si IWISi El iHSII• • BiS ^E^;S Jlilll ffliffi •u • tJIIIIII isil^^ 121 N11 1381 a ssn a i< -a ^i ^f- 21 The foltowing judgment of the Court was p^sed tiy Rajeev Gupta,C.J.: ' Leamed counsel for the parties are heard on admission. 2. Appellant — Smt. Santi Gond has flted thls writ appeal against the oreter dated 20-03-2008,, fwesedt inW.P.^) No.582/2008. 3. Appetlant - Smt. Santi Gond had fited the writ petition ft»r the fbllowingreliefe: "(i) That the transfer order dated^JljB-OI- 2008 (Annexure P10) issued agair^ the ^ petitioner Trom Baikunthpur Area to JI'riUnmljfc <Jp- fehetra may kindly bequashed. •? 8s 5 (ii) That the Respondents, sfieCBlly Respondents 3, 4, 5, may kindty be riestrained ta take part in any coereive steps, againstKtiie petitionerortotakeanysortofrevengeagairstthe petitioner during her service period. <iii) That any other relief what thls HonourabteCourtmaydeemfltandproperb&dso giveoto thepetitioner. (iv) Costs and expenses of ttits petitlon be awareled to the petltioner from the Respondente." 4. The appellanVpetitioner, thus, )n substancewa&seeklng quashtng of the orderdated 10-01-2009 virtierebyttiepetltioner was transferred from Regional hleadquartersBaikynthpurareato Sub-Region Jhilimili. 5. l^amedSmgleJudgedjdnotfindanyinfhTmtymtheqt'deT dated 10-01-20(% impugned in the writ p^ition and, y'lei'eifei'e, •• • • nimmi 2.2 passed the impugned order dated 20-03-2008 dismisslng the appellant's vwit petition. 6. Smt. Anju Ahuja, leamed counsel for the appellant vehemently argued thatthe orderdated 10-01-2008t8 Habtetobe quashed as respondent No.3 has passed the petitioner's order pf transfer dated 10-01-20TO malatidely. 7. On due consideration of the submissions of leamed counsel for the parties and the reasonings given in theimpt^ned order,we do not flnd any ground for interterence in the matter of l»titioner"stransfer frwn Baikunthpur to Jhittmili. 8. Thewritappeal,therefore,isliabletobedismissedandis herebydismissedsummarily. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- SunU Kumar Sinha Judge Bl HB8B iB l^t .W la