IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-6486 of 2010 Date of Decision:5.4.2010 Bhogi Ram .... Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. R.S. Rai, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anurag Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pardeep Virk, D.A.G. Haryana. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) There are seven accused in the FIR. The present petitioner has been named in the FIR alongwith his three sons, his real brother and son of his brother. All are in custody. The entire family has been enroped for having caused three injuries to the deceased. Out of these three injuries, injury No.2 is lacerated wound on the wrist. Injury No.3 is abrasion on right forearm. However, as per the post mortem report cause of death is on account of injury No.1, which is admittedly not attributed to the present petitioner. He is in custody since 29.6.2009. Bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faridabad. 5.4.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE