1* IN TF HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BAGALORE DATED THIS THE 3RD DA%Y OFAPRIL, 1998 B EFORE TI HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE V.P. MOHkNKU?R WRIT PETITIONS flES 11362 TO 11367/98 BETWEE N R.L. Ningegowda, I. ,s, Devegowda, Aged about 43 years, Prop;- Sindu Rani Travels, Sindu Rani Nilaya, Taluk Office Road, Bhadravathi ... PETITIONER (By Advocates R.S.Ravi & Chandrashekar) 1 St ate of Karnat ak a represented by its Secretary to the State Tran sport Deoartnnt, Vidhana Soudha, B angalore. 2 • The Commissioner for Transport, IV Floor, M.S. Building, Dr • B .R • nbedkar Veedhi, Bangalore. 3. The Regional Transport Officer arid Taxation ?uthority, Shimcqa (By Smt, S.Sujatha, FDGP) ••• RESPOENFS —oOo— These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India raying to issue a writ or order in the nature of Certiorari to quash the demard notices of the 3rd respondent dated 19—9—1996 demanding difference from the petitioner intespect of the vehicle in question. —2— These writ petitions are coming on for Pre— liminary hearing this day, the Court made the fo 11owing; ORDER The only question involved in this case is regarding the payment of t ax demanded as per nnexure-H. In view of the validity thereof being upheld by this Court nothing survives for cons ide— ration in these writ petitions. The demand me by the 3rd respondent relates to the arrears of tx levied. The titioner cannot dispute the liability. conferred with the situation the learned Counsel prays that he may be given some time to make the payment. Taking note ofthefcts arid circumstances of the case the Detitioner is directed to deposit the amount in three (3) equel monthly instalments wihin C period of 12 weeks from today. In case the petitioner f ails to make the payment th’writ petitions shall stand dismissed and the respondents are free to recover the amount, sd,c I rsk evp