IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE FRIDAY, THE 7TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 16TH BHADRA 1929 WP(C).No. 26719 of 2007(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ C.V.JOSE, C.J'S PLY GLASS, C.J.TOWER, ROOM NOS. 18, 19 AND 20, IKKANDA WARRIER ROAD, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.JIJO PAUL RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THRISSUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THRISSUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OFFICE, THRISSUR. 2. THE TOWN PLANNING OFFICER, THRISSUR CORPORATION, THRISSUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OFFICE, THRISSUR. BY ADV.SRI.K.B.MOHANDAS, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. .......................................................... W.P.(C)No.26719 OF 2007 ........................................................... DATED THIS THE 7TH SEPTEMBER, 2007 J U D G M E N T The grievance of the petitioner who is aggrieved by Ext.P9 order passed by the Secretary, Corporation of Thrissur is that no time-limit has been fixed under Ext.P9 for complying with the order and that it is likely that the Corporation will implement Ext.P9 even before the petitioner is able to invoke his statutory appellate remedy. 2. Sri.K.B.Mohandas takes notice on behalf of the Corporation. 3. I do not propose to go into the merits of the grounds raised. However, in view of the obvious position that Ext.P9 is an appealable order, I direct the Corporation to keep in abeyance Ext.P9 for a period of three weeks from today. It is open to the petitioner to prefer appeal against Ext.P9. With the above observations and directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE) tgl WP(C)N0. -2- WP(C)N0. -3-