1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2681 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 468 OF 2009. ( Laxmandas Haridas Bairagi -: versus :- The Sub-Divisional Officer and others ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : DECEMBER 11, 2009. Heard Shri N.B. Kalwaghe, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1,2 and 4 and Shri M.M. Sudame, learned counsel for the respondent No.3. Petition was entertained by this Court and interim relief protecting possession of petitioner came to be granted, as at the relevant time Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal was not functioning. By Civil Application No. 2681/2009, respondent No.3 has pointed out that now Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal has resumed functioning and hence petitioner can obtain appropriate orders from the said Tribunal, and this Petition may be disposed of as infructuous. Learned A.G.P. is supporting the application. In these circumstances, Shri Kalwaghe, learned counsel for petitioner states that, keeping all issues on merits 2 open Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal should be directed to decide the prayer for interim relief and revision. He states that the interim order already operating in the matter should be continued for a period of four weeks, so as to enable the petitioner to obtain appropriate orders. Shri Sudame, learned counsel for respondent no. 4 is opposing the said prayer for continuation of interim relief. However, in the circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, interim order granted by this Court on 02.02.2009 are continued, till 15.01.2010 to enable the petitioner to obtain appropriate orders from Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal in that respect. With this liberty, Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. Rule discharged. No cost. JUDGE Rgd.