mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2620 OF 2002 Sou.Savita C. Birajdar Applicant versus Falu Siddhappa Birajdar & ors. Respondents None for applicant. J.P.Yagnik, APP for State. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 16th January 2009 PC : 1. This is an appeal for leave to prefer an appeal under sub section 4 of Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Court notice was ordered to be served on the applicant which is returned with remark "incomplete address". Apart from the fact that the address disclosed in the application is found to be incomplete, I find that the impugned order has been passed in a prosecution at the instance of the State and it is not on a private complaint. Therefore, the application is not maintainable and the same is rejected only on that ground. However, the remedy of the applicant to file appropriate proceedings is kept open. (A.S.OKA, J.)