IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1364 of 2008 NARESH PODDAR Versus CHANDRAMANI DEVI & ANR ----------- 2. 23.9.2008 Heard Mr. Anil Kumar Mukund, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Mukund very fairly informed this Court that the proceeding of the matrimonial case has already come to an end on 8.7.2008 and the aforementioned Misc.Case No. 71/2003 has been disposed of whereby and whereunder the petitioner has been directed to pay a sum of Rs. 800/- for the wife and Rs. 400/- for the daughter. He would, accordingly, submit that when the order dated 14.5.2008 impugned in this civil revision application was passed only till disposal of the aforementioned Misc.Case No. 71/2003, allowing custody of the child in favour of the mother by way of temporary measure, he (petitioner) may be allowed to claim custody of the child in the proposed proceedings that he now would take in view of the impugned order dated 8.7.2008. This Court would not express any opinion on such claim of the petitioner but then as the order dated 14.5.2008 impugned 2 in this civil revision application was only temporary in nature, till disposal of Misc. Case No. 71/2003, it is always open for the petitioner to take appropriate remedy in accordance with law even in respect of the custody of the child. With the aforementioned observation, this application is permitted to be withdrawn. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/