WP(C) 1330/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Handique, learned State c ounsel appearing for the State respondents and Mr. Sarma, learned standing couns el Social Welfare Department. The petitioner by the present petition has challenged the selection and engagement of respondent No.6 as Anganwadi Worker in 387 No. Katahguri L.P. Scho ol Angwadi Centre, on the ground that she being not the resident of the area for which the said centre is created, she could not have been selected and engaged as Anganwadi Worker pursuant to the advertisement dated 19.09.2009. The learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the matter in is sue has already been answered in Chitrawati Patgiri Vs. State of Assam reported in 2011(3) GLT 334 and accordingly the present petition may be disposed of. Having regard to the facts and circumstances involved in this present pe tition as well as the facts and circumstances involved in Chitrawati’s case, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the directions contained in Chitrawati Patgiri(supra). The necessary enquiry shall be conducted by the Director in con sultation with the District Administration. It is, however, made clear that the petitioner as well as the respondent No.6 shall be given all reasonable opportunity of being heard and to produce th e relevant documents in support of their contention. The order that may be passe d shall immediately be communicated to the petitioner as well as the respondent No.6. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.