CWP No.8937 of 2010.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.8937 of 2010 Date of decision : 14.05.2010 Dharam Veer Ranga & others ...Petitioners Versus New India Assurance Co. and another …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL **** Present: Mr. Sameer Sachdeva, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL) The petitioners have approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing the orders dated 25.3.2009 and 18.5.2009 (Annexures P-4 and P-5) whereby recovery of the non-core pay benefits admissible to them as Development Officers (Marketing) and paid to them from 1.4.2003 to 18.10.2005 as actual expenses, was ordered by the respondents. 1 CWP No.8937 of 2010.doc Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners have served a legal notice dated 18.2.2010 (Annexure P-7) upon the respondents for the relief as claimed in the writ petition on which, no action has been taken so far. Learned counsel further states that at this stage, the petitioners shall feel satisfied in case a time-bound direction is issued to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the legal notice (Annexure P-7). After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners and perusing the file, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the legal notice (Annexure P-7), by passing a speaking order affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. May 14, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) atulsethi JUDGE 2