IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1422 of 2008 CHETMAN RAM S/O LATE SAUDAGAR RAM R/O VILL. MUDA, P.S. PALANWA, DISTT. EAST CHAMPARAN --- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. JAGAT TIWARI S/O LATE MAHADEV TIWARI 3. UDAIBHAN TIWARI S/O JAGAT TIWARI 4. CHANDRABHAN TIWARI S/O JAGAT TIWARI 5. VIJAY TIWARI S/O JAGAT TIWARI 6. RIPUSUDAN TIWARI S/O JAGAT TIWARI ---- OPP. PARTIES. For the Petitioner : Mr. Nadim Seraj, Advocate. For the State : Mr. B.P.Singh, APP For the O.Ps : Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate. ----------- 05 08.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner opposite parties and the State. Petitioner is the informant and igniter of the criminal proceeding which gave rise to trial being Tr. No. 1029 of 2008. Learned trial Court by order dated 27.08.2008 found the evidence wholly deficient and acquitted the accuseds (opposite parties) of the charges punishable under Sections 323,341379 and 427 of the Penal Code. It appears that the allegations were that they forcibly cut certain trees from a plot of land claimed by the informant. Counsel submits that learned Court below has committed error of record. From perusal of the order impugned it appears that three witnesses were examined on behalf of the prosecution. The evidence of prosecution witnesses was/were evaluated in paragraph nos. 5 and 6 of the order impugned. This 2 Court does not find any patent illegality in consideration of the matter meriting interference. The application is dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)