... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7276 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7276 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7276 OF 2005 AND AND AND CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7277 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7277 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7277 OF 2005 ...................................................... ...................................................... ...................................................... Office Notes, Office Office Notes, Office Office Notes, Office Memorandum Memorandum Memorandum of Coram, of Coram, of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judges appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judges appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judges orders or directions orders orders or directions orders orders or directions orders and Registrar’s orders and Registrar’s orders and Registrar’s orders ...................................................... ...................................................... ...................................................... Mr Tejesh Dande for the Applicant in both Applications. Mr R.Y. Mirza, A.P.P. for the Respondent in both Applications. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : OCTOBER 28, 2005. DATE : OCTOBER 28, 2005. DATE : OCTOBER 28, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Not on board. Taken on board. These Applications for Anticipatory Bail cannot be considered for the simple reason that the Applicants have not approached the Sessions Court. Since the parties are from Mumbai, the Applicants could have easily approached the Sessions Court. Applications are rejected with liberty to approach the Sessions Court. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE