€'iF^%^s!3?.. BQ^^ ./^u -f- 'lo6 / BEFORE THEHON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRITPETITION (Q N0. ?3^ / 2011 PETITIONER ^' ;...-;•• j>r?.^"r ...•° ^^^A^^1 1 ^r;*"7-^ ..,- ' ^-v ^ RESPONDENTS Anju Singhania, W/o. Shri Suresh Singhania, Aged about 47 years, R/o. Lailunga, District, Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Nagar Panchayat, Lailunga, District - Raigarh, (C.G.) ;\, ^' V. •;i.\ } ^ 3. Collector, Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OFJNDIA rs' I!^ ^\^-^— HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WRTT PETmON (0 No. 7324 of2011 Anju Singhaiiia. RESPONDENTS VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Affirihotri, J. Present: Shri Sourabh Dangi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Tbakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No. 1 and 3. Shri Amn Sao, Advocate for fhe respondent No. 2. ORDER (Passed on 07th day ofDecember, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submite that the impugned notice dated 25.11.2011 (Annexure P/l), for demolition oflfae alleged unauthorized constmction raised by the petitioner, has been withdrawn by the respondent authorities. Thus, nothing sun/ives for adjudication and this petition has become infiuctuous. 2. Leamed counsel appearmg for other side do not controvert the above submission. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infiiictuous. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge Axnit