IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22959 of 2010 JITENDRA KUMAR @ JITENDRA PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 29.07.2010 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 399 and 402 of the I.P.C. and Section (1-B)/a/26/35 of the Arms Act. On the information the police raided the place and apprehended one Pappu Khan with arms. Subsequently the apprehended accused disclosed that this petitioner was also there who escaped immediately before the raid. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the confession of the co-accused on the basis of which the police is chasing the petitioner is not on record. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. However, learned Court below will consider the regular bail of the petitioner keeping in view that petitioner was not apprehended on the spot nor any recovery has been made from the petitioner and the fact that petitioner’s name only sprang up on the basis of confession of co-accused, the petitioner was outside the jurisdiction of the police station on the date of 2 occurrence. Let learned Court below consider to dispose of the regular bail preferably on the same day. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)