RSA No. 1409 of 2009 ( 1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 1409 of 2009 Date of Decision: 4.8.2009 Bharat Singh and others ......Appellant Versus Municipal Corporation, Faridabad .......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri R.S. Sihota, Senior Advocate, with Shri B.S. Rana, Advocate, for the appellants. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral). The plaintiffs are in appeal aggrieved against the judgment and decree passed by the learned first Appellate Court, on 6.9.2008 holding that the Civil Court has no jurisdiction in respect of the land in dispute, which is said to be Shamlat Deh, in terms of Section 13 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 (for short `the Act'). The plaintiffs have filed the present suit challenging the orders passed by the District Collector and the Commissioner, in exercise of the powers conferred upon them in terms of the Act. In terms of Section 13 of the Act, the jurisdiction of the Civil Court is barred. Such is the finding returned by the learned first Appellate Court. In view of the said fact, I do not find any patent illegality or RSA No. 1409 of 2009 ( 2) material irregularity in the finding recorded, which may give rise to any substantial question of law in the present second appeal. Hence, the present appeal is dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 04-08-2009 ds