r c '° ;,E P RFNCH '••^"^? ^t ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF 1UDICATURE AT BILASFUR FETITIONER WPNo. !ftffi1^ OF 2006 Ashok Kumar Dwivedi, Aged about 44 Years S/o Shri R.K.Dwivedi Occupation - Service Head Constable District Special Branch District Dhamtari R/o Govt. Quarier Police Station City KotwaU Disbcict Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh VJERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh ^£ 7.-^'^" ThrouSh Secretaj-y Govemment of CKhattisgarh ••• Department of Home ,...-"" .^".--^ ^"' ^^^ / Department of Home DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur, CKhattisgarh 2. Director General of Police Police Headquarters CKhattisgarh, Raipiir Chhattisgarh 3. Additional Director General of Folice (Admmistration) PoUce Headquarters, Chhattisgarh, Raipiu, Chhattisgarh ^4. Inspector General of Police Raipur Range, Raipur Chhattisgarh / 5. Supermtendent of Police District Dhamtari CKhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRITAVRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND/OR IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR THE LIKE IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER AGAINST THE RESPQNDENTS ~T l-HC-22 SIT^I^ ^iwsn^i ?h^i<=ti 1yf?fl 3ar< -s^ I, 'S^TTs, fat^!'Mlt< z i^i 4N'* _ \ _.,LJlt'..ts)o..^'..S^N.L^ ^...^..^...,..-»-.....^^,..^, >^ V- an^i wnw 'sf^t 'bl-tirl'iil-T iRiraf ^ ^CS TfSRZR ^; srf^iti sn^i "h 8-5-2006 Shri Ranbir Singh, coun^ei for the peiitionsr. Shri Ashutosh Kachcihwaha, Go\rt. Advocats for the State/ respondents. Heard boih the counsei. By {he insSant petition, Gorrectness ofthe orderdated ;|laMarch 200S (Annexure-P/7) passed bythe inspectQr Gensra! of P"!ice, R^ipur whereby'ihe psiitioner has besn dem"ted to the post of headconstable ?qra persod of 3 yeare. Lsamed counse! for th^ peflttoner submitted that agalnst ihe said order t!ie petitioner ftas alreadV (Administralion), but the same General ofPolice(Admr!.). Th on account of bias, ihe appeal counssi for the Detiiionsr subm the petition&r has questioned iegaiity aiid st preferred anappeai on 31" Aprirt! ->nQK lAlhlfh i A.VWV wnicn is pending consideratton befo)-e the Additiona! Direcior Genersi of Poilce s not being decided bythe Additionai Director petitioner has reasonable apprehension that not being decided. . . Ths peiiiioner has air^ady prefsrred an appea! which is pending considsraiion, therefore, at this|stags, interfersnce by this Court under Articie 22S/227 of ths Constiiution sf indla Is not caiied for. Howeyer, teamed ittsd that {he appeai ba dscided al the sariiesi. Therefore, in {he circumstanc^s, responcient No.3 i!s direcied to decide the appeal of ihe petitioner wiihin s^ period of .2 months from ioday, With ihe direotion afore^aid, the petitioti stands disposed of, C-onsequeniiy, M.M.')P. Panies are entltied for c^rfified copy of this order. No.1808i20Q6 a!so siands disoosed of. Sdf- t_.C. Bhadoo .iudge ['Tf^'^^