E BB g^gg, WW^ 2- <r" di-lero IN THB HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT MES^UR ^ W. P. (S)No. ft'-f^ /2007(S.B.) PETITIONER : .^^ ^s^ .^v ...-•"^ ••'F'' A ^" ^"Jiwardhan Pradhan ^r\ S/oShri Gaurishankar Pradhan Aged about 46 years, Asst. Teacher, R/o vmage 8s Post- Sariya, Tah.-Sarangarh, Dist : Raigarh-fC.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS /:1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) .2. District Education Officer Raigarh, <«t1 ^^ %^~^ o' Dist : Raigarh-(C.G-) ^\^ I'g'.' Block Education Officer Block - Raigarh District - Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIW COURT OF CHHATTESSARH AT BILASPlfl^ W. P.fS) No. 895 of 2007 Petitioner : Jiwardhan Pradhan Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and others SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J Preservt'. Mr. Vineet Kumar Pdndey, Advocnte for the petitioner. Mr. Sushi! Dubey, ©ovt.Advocate for the State/ re ORDER (Possed on this 14th bay of February, 2007) 1. The petitioner was appointed on 6.2.1980 as Assistant Teacher on fixed pay scate of Rs. 150/-. After completion of two year probation, he was granted regular pay scale of Rs. 169-300/-. 2. Learned counset appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue invoived in the case is asto whether, the petitioner is entitled to regular poy scaie w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or after completion of probation period. 3. The issue involved, herein was considered by the Madhya Prudesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of tt.P. & o-thers), wherejn it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scate w.e.f. the date of initial dppointment. The mafter was taken-up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Couri- upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to reguiar poy seale from date of initial oppointment. 4. Learned counal appearing for the petitioner further submits that this Court, hriiile considering the sanne issue En Aeman Jain vs. The State Sovernment of Chhattisgarh & another (W. P. No. 1463/2006) by order dated 10.11.2006, has granted regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial qipointment. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that this ease is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the Ciise of Aeman Jain vs. The State Sovernment of Chhattisgarh & onother (Supro). 6. In view of that, this petition is allowed in the saine terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Si^hssh