IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 19TH JUNE 2008 / 29TH JYAISHTA 1930 W.P(C).No. 18404 of 2008(N) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- PONNUSWAMI, S/O. RANGASWAMY UDAYAR, MATTATHUKADU, SHOLAYUR, MANNARKKAD TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH NAMBIAR RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. SECRETARY, SHOLAYUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT, SHOLAYUR, MANNARKKAD TALUK. 2. GOWRI AMMAL, D/O. THIMAYYA KOUNDER, KOTTATHARA AMSOM, MATTATHUKADU DESOM, MANNARKKAD TALUK. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 18404 OF 2008 N ==================== Dated this the 19th day of June, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner alleges that the 2nd respondent is constructing a building trespassing into his land. On the further allegation that in the process there is also violation of the Building Rules, petitioner has filed Ext.P3 complaint before the 1st respondent. It is alleging of inaction on Ext.P3, writ petition has been filed. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, Ext.P3 has been filed and has been received by the 1st respondent, it is necessary that the 1st respondent should take cognizance of the same and pass orders thereon. However, any such order shall only be with notice to the petitioner and the 2nd respondent. Orders on Ext.P3 shall be passed in the manner as above, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 4 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp