IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.4621 of 2011(O&M) Date of decision : 02.08.2011 Munish Paul … Petitioner Versus Major (Retired) Paramjit Singh …Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.C.PURI Present: Mr.Sudhir Paruthi, Advocate for the petitioner. K.C.Puri, J. (Oral) The present revision petition has been filed by the tenant- revisionist against the order dated 7.6.2011 passed by the Rent Controller, Jalandhar, vide which his evidence was closed by order. It is alleged that the case was fixed for evidence of the landlord on 28.1.2011 and the landlord closed his evidence on that day and the same was adjourned to 22.2.2011. After granting few opportunities to the tenant- revisionist, the Rent Controller closed the evidence by order dated 7.6.2011. It is pleaded that Shri Baldev Singh, Advocate who was engaged to pursue the case on behalf of the tenant-revisionist, has not informed him regarding the date of evidence. Although, the said ground cannot be believed but in the interest of justice, one opportunity should be granted to the tenant- revisionist. Consequently, the revision petition stands accepted without issuing notice to avoid any further delay in the case. The tenant-revisionist is allowed to produce his entire evidence by affording one opportunity on payment of Rs.5000/- as costs. Petition stands disposed of. ( K.C. Puri) Judge 02.08.2011 sd Civil Revision No.3621 of 2011(O&M) 2