IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION No.11029 of 2000 Between: K.Errappa S/o.K.Rangappa Anantapur Municipality Anantapur Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of A.P Rep.by its Secretary,Municipal Administration Secretariat Buildings Hyderabad. 2 The Special Commissioner and Director of Municipal Admn MCH Complex 4th Floor Hyderabad. 3 The Commissioner Anantapur Municipality Anantapur Dist. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to To issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing the proceednigs Rc.352/2000/E1, Dt.19-1-2000 and 3-6-2000 is illegal,arbitrary,and contrary to the rules and also the orders passed by this Hon'ble courto and also further declare that non-passing of any interim orders in O.A.No.2786/2000 is illegal,arbitrary and contrary to the orders passed by the Hon'ble Court and further direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in service till he attains the age of 60 years and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.GUMMALA.VIJAYA KUMAR The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION No.11029 of 2000 ORDER: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Eswaraiah) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J _____________________ P.SWAROOP REDDY, J Date: 21-07-2009 Prv