1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.06.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.RAJESWARAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.M.AKBAR ALI H.C.P(MD)No.420 of 2011 Mohamed Umar Fazil .. Petitioner vs. 1.State represented by the Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli City, Collectorate Campus, Tirunelveli. 2.The Inspector of Police, Perumalpuram Police Station, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli. 3.Subbaiah .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus to direct the Respondents to produce the detenue namely Raji @ Zumaina Haseena, aged about 21 years before this Court and set her at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.Mohamed Umar Fazil [Party in Person] For respondents 1 & 2 :Mr.C.Ramesh Addl.Public Prosecutor ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.RAJESWARAN,J) The petitioner has filed this petition to produce his wife/the detenue Raji @ Zumaia Haseena, aged about 21 years before this Court. 2. The case of the petitioner is that he has married the detenue, his collegiate on 12.5.2011, who also got converted into Islam Religion on her own after marriage. However, she went to her parents house after marriage with a promise that she would come and join him after completing the course. But she did not come back. The petitioner was informed by her over phone that she was kept in illegal custody by her parents. On 31.5.2011, complaint was given to respondent No.2. But no action was taken. Hence, the above Habeas Corpus Petition. 3. In the last hearing i.e. on 13.6.2011, the detenue appeared before this Court through her counsel and she categorically told us that she would like to be only with her parents and not to go with the petitioner. She has also denied the marriage and the other allegation of conversion https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 of religion made by the petitioner. According to her, she was cheated by the petitioner, her college senior. However, she is firm and clear that she wants to be with her parents only. Her statement is recorded. Since the petitioner was not present on that day and the matter was directed to be listed today. 4. Today, the petitioner has appeared in person before this Court. We appraised him of what has happened on 13.6.2011 and the statement made by the detenue before this Court. 5. In view of the fact that the detenue appeared before the Court and took a decision on her own to be with her parents, there is nothing further remains to be considered in this petition. The petitioner has also accepted the factual position and we also advised to pursue his career. In the result, the Habeas Corpus Petition is closed. asvm Sd/- Deputy Registrar[LA] /True copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1.The Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli City, Collectorate Campus, Tirunelveli. 2.The Inspector of Police, Perumalpuram Police Station, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1 cc to Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah, Advocate SR.No.18664. H.C.P.(MD)No.420 of 2011 Dated:15.6.2011 2P/5C RPB 29.06.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/