IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN TUESDAY, THE 8TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 19TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 3204 of 2011(A) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- KOCHU THRESSIA, W/O.MATHEW XAVIER, RESIDING AT 1/1573,SOUTH THAMARAPARAMBU, FORT KOCHI,KOCHI-01. BY ADV. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN SRI.SAIJO HASSAN SRI.RAJAN VELLOTH SRI.PRATHAP PILLAI SRI.RAFEEK. V.K. SRI.BENOJ C AUGUSTIN SRI.P.P.GENSON RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. MATHEW XAVIER,C.C.1/1573,SOUTH THAMARAPARAMBU,FORT KOCHI,KOCHI-01. 2. MATHEW CHRISTOPHER,S/O.MATHEW XAVIER, PATTUPARAMBIL,SOUTH THAMARAPARAMBU,FORT KOCHI, KOCHI-01. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR, FORT KOCHI POLICE STATION, FORT KOCHI. ADV. SRI.S.RAJEEV FOR R1& 2 GOVT.PLEADER, SMT.CHARISHMA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS EXT.P1: COPY OF ORDER IN M.P.NO.3215/2009 ON THE FILES OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE- I, KOCHI. EXT.P2: COPY OF ORDER IN M.P.3574/2009 ON THE FILES OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-1, KOCHI EXT.P3: COPY OF EXPLANATION FROM SHO, FORT KOCHI POLICE STATION DT.2.11.1999. EXT.P4: COPY OF ORDER IN MP.3744/2009 ON THE FILES OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-I, KOCHI. EXT.P5: COPY OF ORDER DT.2.3.2010 IN I.A.316/2010 IN O.S.63/2010 ON THE FILES OF ADDL.MUNSIFF OF KOCHI. EXT.P6: COPY OF CRIMENO.564/2010 OF FORT KOCHI POLICE STATION. EXT.P7: COPY OF COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT ON 18.1.2011. EXT.P8: COPY OF RECEIPT ISSUED FROM THE FORT KOCHI POLICE STATION. //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. -------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.3204 OF 2011 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of February, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~~~~~~~ Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J. Service complete. None appears. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Petitioner says that the 1st respondent is her husband and the 2nd respondent is their son. She says that she is in absolute possession of a building, where she lives. She pleads that she is a senior citizen aged 72 years and she is conducing some activity in building materials. It also appears that some proceedings are pending or were decided in accordance with the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. Under such circumstances, we direct the 3rd respondent to attend to any complaint of the petitioner about any threat to life. Otherwise, the petitioner can seek appropriate remedies from competent jurisdiction. Writ Petition ordered accordingly. (THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE) (P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE) ps