IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23989 of 2010 RAM SANEHI YADAV @ SANEHI YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 29.07.2010 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307/34, 379 of the I.P.C. It is alleged against the petitioner that he gave farsa blow to the informant though initially the injury was found to be caused by hard and blunt substance but subsequently the doctor opined that the injury was caused by sharp cutting weapons and the nature of injury was grievous. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. However, learned Court below will consider the regular bail application considering this fact that due to land dispute the occurrence has taken place, there is case and counter case and initial injury report does not corroborate the allegation in the F.I.R and if possible, dispose of the regular bail application preferably on the same day. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)