IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 8963 of 2006 Between: 1 Ms. L. Sowmya, D/o. L. Vishwanathan, Dilshuknagar, Hyderabad. 2 Ms.M. Sruthi, D/o. M. laxma Reddy, H.No. 16-9-749/45, Ajanta Colony, Old Malakpet, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Govt of A.P., rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Department of Higher Educatin , Secretarit, Hyd. 2 The a.P. State Counceil for Higher Education, rep. by its Secretary, Mahaveer Marg, Hyderabd-28. 3 All India Council for Technical Education, rep. its Member Secretary, Indira Gandhi Sports Complex, IP Estate, New Delhi-110 002. 4 Jawaharlal Nehru Technoligical University, rep. byits Registrar, Kukatpally, Hyderabad. 5 The Convenor, EAMCET-2006, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Kukatpally, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue by the 3rd respondent limiting admission into engineering courses including Biotechnology only to those students who hae passed 10 + 2 Examination with Mathematics and physics as cumpulsory subjects, b) G.O.ms.no.8 dt. 4.2.2006 issued by the 5h respondent consequently and; c) Notification dt. 4.2.2006 issued by the 5th respondent in accordance with the above. as arbitrary , illegal, offending Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to restore Rule 3 (6) of rules in G.O.Ms.No.16 dt. 25.2.2004 andpass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.SURENDER RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 8963 OF 2006 ORDER: 1. This writ petition is listed under the Caption ‘for infructuous cases’. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It indicates that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing this writ petition. 2. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _____________________________ Justice B.Seshasayana Reddy 20th August, 2008. KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 8963 OF 2006 20th Augusts, 2008.