IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12923 of 2010 LAKSHMAN SAH @ LAKSHAM KUMAR, SON OF LATE FAGU SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 02.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 25(1-b)A, 26, 35 of the Arms Act and Sections ¾ of Explosive Substance Act. Considering that huge amount of explosive was found in the house of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is made clear that the petitioner’s case was not bifurcated for the purposes of this order. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)