IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37423 of 2009 1. AWADESH KUMAR @ AWADESH YADAV @ AWADESH PRASAD S/O LATE RAM ROOP YADAV R/OVILL BASAVANPUR TOLA, SAMACHAK,P.S.BAKHTIARPUR, DISTT- PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SURENDRA KUMAR YADAV S/O LATE RADHEY YADAV R/OVILL BASAVANPUR TOLA, SAMACHAK,P.S.BAKHTIARPUR, DISTT- PATNA ----------- 2/ 19/03/2010 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for leave to withdraw the application to seek his remedies afresh on the basis of the documents and procedures for ascertainment of the age of the juvenile under Rule-12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2007. The impugned order has proceeded on the premise that the petitioner had not produced the documents as mandated under the Rules and neither was there any medical report. Needless to state that if the aforesaid lacuna is fulfilled by the petitioner, matters have to be decided afresh when the latter part of the impugned order, where the court records its own conclusions in absence of documents, shall not inhibit exercise of powers by the court below afresh in accordance with law. The application is dismissed as withdrawn. KC/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)