IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR MONDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2009 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 26646 of 2009(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M.VIJAYAKUMARI, D/O.MADHAVAN, AGED 42 YEARS, HOUSE NO.17/36, KUNNATHOOR MEDU, NEAR SOUTH POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.G.HARIHARAN SRI.PRAVEEN HARIHARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TOWN SOUTH POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD. 2. CHANDRAN, S/O.THANKAMONY, KODUVAYOOR KANNAMKODE DESOM, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD-01. ADV. SRI.SAJAN VARGHEESE K. FOR R2 SRI.LIJU. M.P FOR R2 GOVT.PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS-R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.C.NO.26646 OF 2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER's EXHIBITS: Ext.P1: True copy of the Sale Deed No.5430/2003 of SRO Palakkad dated 5.11.2003. Ext.P2: True copy of the representation dated 27.8.2009 filed by the petitioner before the 1st respondent seeking protection to the life. Ext.P3: True copy of the judgment in Crl.Appeal No.508/2007 dated 26.06.2009. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ. --------------------------------------------- W.P. (C) NO. 26646 OF 2009 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of December, 2009 JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph, J. The petitioner approached this Court seeking police protection. Admittedly, there are civil disputes between the petitioner and the second respondent. The petitioner submits that she needs protection to enter into her property and to enjoy the same. According to the second respondent, the petitioner does not have any right over the property. Thus, the disputes are to be settled before the civil court. Therefore, relegating the parties to settle their disputes before the civil court, the Writ Petition is dismissed. (KURIAN JOSEPH) JUDGE (C.T. RAVIKUMAR) JUDGE sp/ 2 KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ. W.P.(C)NO.26646/2009 JUDGMENT 21st December, 2009