-^ ^69 •^v HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRTT PETmON fSV No. 888 of2009 Y PETmONER : Ku. Madhuri Dadsena D/o Shri K.L.Dadsena, Aged about 40 yeai-s, Assistant Teacher, Resident ofDeori, Block Kumd, Distt. Dhamtari (CG.) VERSU8 RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawaii Raipur, Dist:Raipur(C.G.) 2. The District Education OfiGcer, Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) 3. The Collector, Dhamtari CTribal Welfare Department) Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) 4. Tlie Block Education OfBcer, Block - Kurud, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) 5. The Block Education Qfficer, Block Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) 6. The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur,Distt. Raipur (C.O.) WMT PETmON LWDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 8B: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aznihotri. J. Present: Shri S.K.Dadsena, Advocate forthe petitioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy Advocate General forthe State/respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on 11th day of Febmary, 2009) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for Ihe petitioner, on instructions, subnute fhat the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits, as after making representation on 15.09.2008 (Anne3aire P/7), subsequent order was passed on 22.01.2009 (Annexure P/6) which is not under challenge in this petition. However, the petitioner seeks pennission to make a representation before the Colleetor and District Education Officer, Dhamtari. Leamed counsel appearing for other side has no • • objection. 2. Accordmgly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above stated liberty. ; 3. In the event a representation is made, tfae same shall be considered in accordance with law on its own merits, within a period ofthree weeks from the date ofTeceipt of the representation alongwith a copy ofthis order. 4. Consequently.IA.No. l,forstay,alsostands disposedof. Aimt Sd/- | Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^ —J1