WP(C) 27/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B. P. KATAKEY Heard Mr J Patowary, learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as Mr B Goswami , learned standing counsel for the Water Resources department appearing for the respondents. The contention of the petitioner, in present petition, is that though in pursuance of the work-order issued he executed the works to the satisfaction of all concerned, the outstanding amount due to him has not been paid till date. Learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the matter in issue has already been answered by a full Bench of this Court in Tamsher Ali -vs- Stat e of Assam & Ors, reported in (2008) 4 GLT 1 and as such prayed that present wri t petition be disposed of in terms of the directions contained therein. Having regard to the issues involved as well as the submissions of learn ed counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the directions contained in Tamsher Ali’ case(supra). The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.