IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17997 of 2010 RAJ KUMAR YADAV, S/o Basudeo Yadav. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 21.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 302/34, 147, 148, 149, 323, 324 and 326 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner has misused his privilege of bail for a period of about fifteen years but did not indulge in any anti social activities and now he is in custody since 27.06.2009, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 1st Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nawada in connection with S.Tr. No. 413 of 1988/75 of 2010 arising out of Sirdalla P.S. Case No. 36 of 1987 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any 2 change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)