1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 6. CA/12086/2009 In WP/5724/2009 WITH CA/12834/2009 In WP/5724/2009 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr.Swapnil Patunkar, Adv., h/f Mr.S.S.Patunkar, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. V.G.Shelke, AGP for respondent State. Mr.B.A.Darak, Adv., for R.3 in W.P. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:15/10/2010 1. Heard. Considering the nature of the controversy involved, revolving to access for which remedies are availed by the writ petitioner before the competent Revenue Authorities, the application (No.12834/2009) moved by respondent No.3 Vithal is disposed of as the writ petition will be finally heard on 26th Oct.,2010. 2 2. The intervention application (No.12086/2009) allowed as the rights of intervenor are involved in the lis concerning access. The intervenor will be certainly adding to the factual narration than creating impediment. The Counsel for the writ petitioner shall immediately carry necessary amendment, adding the intervenor as one of the respondent and serve copy of the writ petition along with Annexure to Mr.Swapnil Patunkar, learned Counsel, within a week from today. S.O. to 26th Oct.,2010. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/12086-09cagr