1 ABA.203,204&205-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION [1] CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.203 OF 2011 [FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL] Mr.Rajesh M. Kapadia. .. Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. .. Respondents. ---------- WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.204 OF 2011 [FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL] Mr.Bharat M. Kapadia. .. Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. .. Respondents. ---------- WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.205 OF 2011 [FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL] Mr.Anupam M. Shukla. .. Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. .. Respondents. .... Mr.Aabad H. Ponda, Advocate a/w. Mr.Sameer Nangre & Ms.Trupti M. Kapadia, Advocates for the Applicants in all Applications. Mr.D.N. Salvi, Advocate for Respondent No.2 in all Applications. Mrs.S.D. Shinde, A.P.P. for the State in all Applications. .... CORAM : A. R. JOSHI, J. DATED : 31st MARCH, 2011. 2 ABA.203,204&205-11 P. C. : 1. In furtherance of the affidavit filed by respondent No.3 PI, CBI, BS & FC, Mumbai, today statement is made by the learned Counsel for CBI that the cause of action for initiation of the proceedings concerning the present matter, has entirely arisen within the State of Gujarat. On this statement made on behalf of CBI and recorded by the Court, learned Counsel for the applicants wants to withdraw the present applications and to take recourse to appropriate remedy by approaching the competent Court at Gujarat. Question of jurisdiction is kept open. In the meantime, interim relief already granted shall continue for further period of three weeks from today. 2. With the above directions, all the three applications are allowed to be withdrawn and accordingly disposed of. (A. R. JOSHI, J.) PPD