IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.8479 of 1999 Between: B. Satyanarayana Rao, S/o Narasimham, Sri Visakha Grameena Bank Rep. by Chairman, Srikakulam. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Sri Visakha Grameena Bank Rep. by Chairman, Srikakulam. 2 General Manager Sri Visakha Grameena Bank, Head Office, Srikakulam. ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring that the action of the respondents in not promoting the petitioner from category of Scale-I officer to Scale-II officer with effect from 1-6-98, while promoting the Juniors of the petitioner is arbitrary and illegal and direct the respondents to promote the petitioner in the category of Scale-II officer with effect from 1-6-98 and allow benefits of seniority at the immediate position to Mr. Mohandas and allow all consequential benefits and grant such other reliefs as it deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.V.VENKATARAMANA Counsel for the Respondents: Mr.K.SRINIVASA MURTHY The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed seeking a declaration that the action of respondents in not promoting the petitioner from category of Scale-I Officer to Scale-II Officer with effect from 1-6-1998 while promoting the juniors of the petitioner is arbitrary and illegal and consequently to direct respondents to promote the petitioner in the category of Scale-II Officer with effect from 1-6-1998 and allow the benefit of seniority and other consequential benefits. Learned counsel for the respondents states that the case of the petitioner was taken up immediately after filing of the Writ Petition and the relief as sought for in the Writ Petition was granted. In this regard, learned counsel also produced a copy of the Proceedings in Circular (Staff) No.29, dated 6-11-1999 of the Chairman, Sri Visakha Grameena Bank, Srikakulam. The same is placed on record. In view of the above, nothing survives for further adjudication in the Writ Petition, as of now. The Writ Petition is, therefore, closed. No order as to costs. 13-3-2008 prk