IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 12480 of 2009 Between: 1 G.Rajgopal Reddy S/o.G.Sesha Reddy R/o.590-8, YMR Colony, Proddutur, Kadapa District. 2 C.Ramaiah S/o.Late Papaiah R/o.8-121-4, Niranjan Colony, Erramukkapally, Kadapa. 3 Patan Raheem Khan S/o.Late Patan Yusuf Khan R/o.20/8, Akulaveedhi, Kadapa. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 State of Andhra Pradesh, Department of Registration and Stamps, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Joint Sub Registrar-I, Registration and Stamps Department, Kadapa, Kadapa District. 3 The Assistant Commissioner (FAC) Endowment Department, Kadapa. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue Writ of Mandamus or other appropriate order or direction particularly in the nature of a writ declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing the documents P.P264/2008, 265/2008 and 266/2008 dated 12.12.2008 as absolutely arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of article 14 of the Constitution of India and without any legal authority and consequently direct the respondents to register and release the said document No's. P264/2008, P265/2008 and P266/2008 all dated 12.12.2008 forthwith to the petitioners in the interest of justice and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.NALIN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.NO.12480 OF 2009 ORAL ORDER Smt.N.Padma Advocate representing Sri B.Nalin Kumar, the learned counsel for the petitioners states that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the said submission the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J 15th JULY 2009 *TSNR