HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 2094 OF 2011 ORAL ORDER: Aggrieved by the order dated 23.3.2011 passed by the Family Court, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, in I.A.No. 186 of 2009 in O.P.No. 714 of 2008, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. Petitioner herein is the husband. He filed O.P.No. 714 of 2008 against his wife to grant decree of divorce dissolving the marriage dated 6.5.1998. On 6.11.2009 husband filed I.A.No. 185 of 2009 under Section 6 of Hindu Marriage Act to grant custody of two children to him and on the same day wife also filed I.A.No. 186 of 2009 under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act to direct the husband to pay Rs. 1,34,000/- towards the expenditure incurred from July 2008 to December 2008 and Rs. 24,000/- towards maintenance per month from January 2009 onwards regularly every month till the disposal of OP 714 of 2008 and to pay Rs. 20,000/- towards legal and miscellaneous expenses to wife and children. The court below disposed of those I.As and directed the husband to deposit a sum of Rs. 9,000/- per month regularly on or before 10th of every month towards maintenance of wife and children. Husband was further directed to deposit a sum of Rs. 3000/- towards legal expenses. Aggrieved by the same, husband filed the present Civil Revision Petition. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the court below failed to appreciate the documents filed by the petitioner as all documents clearly and clinchingly establishes that his take home salary is only Rs. 18,000/- in such a case granting maintenance of Rs. 9,000/- to the petitioner and children is excessive and exorbitant and it is very difficult to the petitioner to meet his daily needs with the remaining amount. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also perused the material made available on record. As seen from the record, the court below taking into consideration the statement made by the husband in the open court at the time of arguments on 9.3.2011 that his net salary is Rs. 18,000/-, directed the husband to pay a sum of Rs. 3,000/- to the wife, Rs. 3,000/- to his daughter Anjali and Rs. 3,000/- to his son Tara Pranay per month regularly and accordingly, it directed the husband to deposit a sum of Rs. 9,000/- per month on or before 10th of every month. Therefore, as long as marital tie subsists, the husband is bound to maintain his wife and children; hence, the order of the court below is quite reasonable and I see no reasons to interfere with the order passed by the Court below and the Civil Revision Petition is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J DATE: 12.08.2011 KA