-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 101 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4022 OF 2008 Kumbhar Tanaji Kallappa ...Petitioner versus The President, Siddhartha Charitable Trust and others ..Respondents Mr. A.M. Joshi for the petitioner. None for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. A.P. Vanarase, AGP, for the State-respondent No.2. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR, J. DATE: OCTOBER 18, 2008. P.C. Heard Mr. Joshi for the review petitioner. In my view, no order is required to be passed on this review petition, as the Court had disposed of the writ petition after hearing both the sides on July 15, 2008. Mr. Joshi, however, submitted that it was not open for the management to pass termination order retrospectively as the petitioner was all throughout in service till the writ petition was decided by this Court. So far as this aspect is concerned, it is always open to the petitioner to take all available grounds before the Tribunal challenging the subsequent order. This Court is not required to express any opinion on this aspect. However, if any point is raised before the Tribunal, the Tribunal may decide such point in accordance -2- with law based on the facts and circumstances of the case. It is for the petitioner to proceed with his application/appeal, if any, filed against the subsequent order and it is for the Tribunal to decide such application/appeal expeditiously and in accordance with law without being influenced by whatever observations made by this Court in the writ petition. It is clarified that on merits this Court has not expressed any opinion so far as other proceedings initiated by the present petitioner is concerned. 2. In view of what is stated above, this review petition is not required to be entertained and hence disposed of. P.B. MAJMUDAR, J.