IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21367 of 2010 MURARI YADAV, SON OF LATE RAM NARAYAN PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 30.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 22.7.2008 since he had been identified in the Test Identification Parade by three persons. It has further been submitted that out of three identifying witnesses two of them have been examined during trial and they did not identify the petitioner as one of the dacoits. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J. XII, Patna, Distt. Patna, in Sessions Trial No. 2580 of 2008 arising out of Parsa Bazar P.S. Case No. 81 of 2008, G.R. No. 2763 of 2008 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other shall be the wife of the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he 2 will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)