^ ^^sS^-0 ^^•p':^-"^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M. C. C. No. 155 OF 2011 (S.B.) (Arisinfi[ out ofS.A. No. 428/20011 APPLICANT ^^ ^^' \^5'-<^ >:^-^"^ '^r^- Panchanand Das, S/o.Shri Tulsi Das Vaishnav, aged about 52 years, R/o. Village Bhanwarpur, Tahsil -Saraipali, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) VERSUS NON-APPLICANT PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS :l(a) Uttam, S/o. late Shri Panchram, (b) Ganesh, S/o. late Shri Panchram, (c) Dhan Das, S/o. late Shri Panchram, Above 1 to 3 resident of Village- Bhanwarpur, Tahsil-Saraipali, District-Mahasamund (C.G.) 2. Santram, S/o. Shri Dhansai, aged about 62 years, Caste Satnami, Occupation Cultivation, Resident of Village Bhanwarpur, Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.) 3. Ram Prasad, S/o. Lala Satnami, aged about 32 years 4. Shiv Kumar, S/o. Lala Satnami, aged about 30 years, 5. Tula, S/o. Pakla, aged about 50 years, 6. Labho, S/o. Pakla, aged about 53 years, ^ 7. Tohlu, S/o. Pakla, aged about 40 years, 8. Dhupra, S/o. Pakla, aged about 40 years, 9. Shrawan, S/o. Milan Satnami, aged about 34 years, 10. Budhu, S/o. Milan Satnami, aged about 32 years, 11. Chirchira, S/o. Milan Satnami, aged about 30 years, Above no. 3 to 11 are cultivator R/o. Village Bhanwarpur, Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.) 12(a)Firtin Bai, W/o. Shri Tikaram, R/o. Village Gyatripur, Tukra, Post Khokhsha, Tahsil Basna, District Mahasamund (C.G.) (b) Punni Bai, W/o. Shri Sanat Ram, R/o. Village Nalipani, Post Bhainsadarha, P.S. Jharband, District Bargarh (Orissa) (c) Dhurai Bai, W/ o . Shri Asadhu Ram, R/o. Village Chamradih, Post Limjipatra, P.S. Jharband, District Bargarh (Orissa) 13. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, Mahasamund (C.G.) APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF S. A. N0. 428/2001 \ '-HC-22 3^1 ^T r^jch 3^r 5h^ii<=b ^fia Sahu F ^^r^TFTRPT, ^Ti1^JI<o, ^Krll^y 3TT^T 'tRR? WRC'TrW^lch ^^ST' 6 3^['^<T?^H: ^Rf^T S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Afearwal 25.03.2011 f4r dot Shri KN Nande, Advocate Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel Heard on application for res| Leamed counsel appearing counsel for the appellant could mistake, therefore, SA No. 42|8/01 08.03.2011, may be restored to its On due consideration, I applicant has succeeded in explaitiing therefore, the application is allowe|d itsoriginal file. A copy of this order be and the same be Usted for hearing. a|m <^l^fd<'flT1 "RTR^f ^ fe^ <Fsi^i< '^'^ri^R^TT^r applicant. L^vyer for the State. Doration of SA No. 428/01. |for the applicant submits that the !\ot appear on account of bonafide which was dismissed on (|)riginal file. satisfied that the counsel for the cause of his/her absence, and SANo. 428/01 is restored to pla^ed on record ofthe original appeal Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge [Tft^, ^^