IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13923 of 2010 RANJIT THAKUR S/O LATE KRISHNA THAKUR, R/O VILLAGE-KARMANIYAN, P.S.- PAKRIBRAWAN, DISTRICTR- NEWADA…………………….PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………………………….OPP. PARTY. 3 30-06-2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 27.4.2005 in connection with a case registered under sections 302/34, 120B of the I.P.C and section 27 of the Arms Act. The name of the petitioner sprang up on the confession of co-accused. After perusing the case diary learned counsel for the State submits that the eye witnesses have named four persons who assaulted but they have not named the petitioner. Though the petitioner has serious criminal antecedent but it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in most of the cases the petitioner is on bail and those cases are of 2001 and 2003. Moreover from the impugned order be appears that the other charge sheeted accused have been acquitted in the matter. Considering the fact that the petitioner’s direct `involvement has not come during the investigation particularly in the statement of the eye witnesses, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Sheikhpura in connection with 2 Sheikhpura P.S. Case No. 84 of 2003. It is made clear that the learned Magistrate will be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner if he fails to appear two consecutive dates and if he get himself involved in any such kind of offences. S.P. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J. )