Crl. Misc No. M 16860 OF 2011 ****** Jitender @ Golu vs State of Haryana Present : Mr. B.S.Bhalla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmohan Sikka, DAG Haryana Mr. Manjit Singh, Advocate for the complainant. ******* The petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.47, dated 3.3.2011, registered under Sections 148, 149, 323, 506, 307 of the IPC, at Police Station Pinjore, Haryana. On 1.6.2011, the following contention was noticed :- “ Learned counsel has argued that the main accused Hari Om, injury attributed to whom has now been classified under Section 307 IPC, has been arrested and released on bail after the invocation of Section 307 IPC.” Counsel for the respondent, on instructions from ASI Jasvinder Singh, as also counsel for the complainant have argued that as on date, there is no evidence that the petitioner did not cause the injury in respect of which Section 307 of the IPC has been invoked. As per learned counsel, there is even a chance that the injury may have been caused by the petitioner. Be that as it may, one accused has been arrested on the allegation that he has caused that injury and has been granted regular bail. Of-course, during the trial if it is found that the petitioner is also guilty of an offence under Section 307 of the IPC, he would certainly be convicted and sentenced accordingly. However, at this stage in my considered opinion the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. Consequently, the petitioner is directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on 9.8.2011 Crl.Misc No. M 16860 of 2011 :2: and on any other day on which the Investigating Officer requires his presence and in the event of his arrest, the petitioner shall be released on anticipatory bail by the Investigating Officer to his satisfaction subject to the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) August 01, 2011. JUDGE `kk'