IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR FIRST APPEAL NO.801/1991 ANUBHAI CHIMANLAL KUSUMGAR & ANOR ..VS.. M/S SAGARMAL NEVATIA & SONS Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or judges Orders. CORAM: SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE: 4 /10 / 2010 The notices could not be served on the appellant no.1, as the appellant was not traceable on the given address as per the bailiff report. The notice to the appellant no.2 is also received unversed, as he was not traceable on the given address as per bailiffs report. The notices were re-issued to the unversed appellants after the bailiff report was received. Since the correct addresses of the appellants cannot be ascertained by the office, in the absence of providing the same by the appellant himself, there is no possibility of service on the appellants. None appeared on behalf of the appellants on 23.8.2010. Shri M.S. Deshpande, advocate who had previously appeared on behalf of the appellant in this first appeal, was not present on the previous date and is also not present today, so as to supply the address of the appellant no.1 and 2. In such circumstances, there is no alternative, but to dismiss this first appeal. The first appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. JUDGE SMP.