IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16588 of 2009 RADHA KANT . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2/ 02/12/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner assails his order of transfer dated 15.10.2009 on the ground that it has been issued barely months later, when he has joined duty at Rohtas as recently as on 6.3.2009. In view of the nature of the order to be passed, this Court does not consider it proper to make any observation, lest it would prejudice the petitioner or the authorities in considering the representation of the petitioner. The petitioner is stated to have filed a representation explaining his absence and for which recent order of transfer has been passed. If the employee explains the absence, it is for the authority to consider it and thereafter either to accept or reject it by a reasoned order. This Court considers it proper only to observe that the representation in the nature of the controversy should be disposed of expeditiously and the employee should not be left in lurch or be given the feeling of neglect by use of administrative power of inaction. This Court expects the representation to be disposed by a reasoned and speaking order within three weeks from the date of receipt and/or presentation thereof. Liberty is given to file additional representation also, if so advised. The writ application stands disposed. AKS/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)