INTHEHIGHCOURTOFCHHATTlSGARHATBILASPURfC.G.') WRIT PETITION N0.5&76 /2004 .-r PETITIONER ^^v ..^ ^^ /'.^\^' <^^^ n&^ ^y RESPQNDENT ^orporation Bilaspur Thrpugh : Its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS yy\/s. Bansilal Nanda, A partnership firm, M.G. Road, Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari (CG), through : Partner, Rajkumar Soni. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^-^" X:;-HC—78 '3^ "4i^M'4, ®xilyii<o,Miniyy .LO,T,yo.,.5^02S 4- ;7??<1 ^I'R;iR? ST STltf »;i4i«n qiTifeqh'WWff ^'ft^t T^RSTC ^'3fl!R3?^T Heard Shri *A.O. Sharma, countei for the oetitioner. -IS Ths pstltlQner has prsfsrrsd this writ pstitlGn undsr Article 227 of the Constitution of India, questi^ning tha ieaah'ty of the or'der dated i2.8.2004 osssea' bv the l" Add xecution Csae. No.4/2003. Learned cou.nsel for the- Det aqfflnst the erstwhlie Bilaspu" &e|,'elop"'ent .•".uthority, whereas t-he iearned Cou"* bsiow has issued thei Munidoai Corooration. BiiasDur, whicN Ostitioner seeks To withdr-aw this Tionai District Judae, Biiasour !" ioner submits that the decree was warrant ot attachmsrit against the i**.—-*-^s--.: t"" i3 nor oarty' &erore Wut fcourt. 2n my opinion, proper remed^ avaiiabte to the petltwner wc.s to i'nove tl<5€ sxscutlnQ £.ourt r'aisinQ th's oblectio", i^5~sad of fil'nQ thls w"it DetiTior! before Thi's Court. In visw of the sbo'/e obdferyation. iecrnsd counssl fcr the iwnt Detjtion with Jiberty' to mov< jbefore the sxecutinc! Court. The petition is dismissed as wi'lhdrawn with tiber'ti/ sforesaid- Consequentiy, M.('W.)P.No.5399/2004 and I.A.No.9967/2004 istand disoosed of. Jertified copy as per Ruies. ssi-~ L.C. Bhadoo •t3 'St/—'w-^a?--.-^. ..^-^,