15 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 1999 of 2008 Date of decision:25.3.2010 Anshul Singhal ...Petitioner. Versus IITT, College of Engineering and others. ….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B,Misra, Judge. For the Petitioner: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Advocate. For Respondent No.1 None. For respondent No.2 Mr. B.C. Negi, Advocate. For respondent No.3. Mr. G.D. Sharma, Advocate. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J.(Oral) The simple issue involved in this case is whether the Pandit Course examination undertaken by the writ petitioner at Gurukul University Vrindaban, Mathura affiliated in U.P., is equivalent to +2 Course for the purpose of admission to B.Tech. Course in any institution affiliated to H.P. University. In the nature of the view, we propose to take in this case, we do not think that this court should go into the various factual matrix since ultimately it depends on the equivalence certificate to be issued by the Board of School Education. We are informed that the writ petitioner had already represented the matter before the Board of School Education and the Board is in communication with the Gurukul University Vrindaban. Learned counsel appearing for the Board of School Education submits that despite two reminders, Gurukul University Vrindaban 16 has not furnished the required material so as to enable the Board to take decision in the matter. In the above circumstances, we dispose of the writ petition as follows. 1. The writ petitioner may produce the copy of this judgment before Gurukul University Vrindaban, Mathura within two weeks from today. The said University taking note of the fact that the petitioner is disabled to reap the benefit of the course undertaken by him only for the reason of non receipt of the equivalence certificate and the delay is only for non furnishing of the required materials by the University, so as to enable the Board to take a decision, may furnish the relevant and required materials to the Board of School Education within another two weeks. 2. Thereafter the Board of School Education will take decision having regard also to the facts and circumstances of the case, some of which are referred to in the petition and also with reference to the materials produced. A decision shall be rendered within another one month. 3. Depending upon the decision thus taken by the Board of School Education, the University will do the needful in the matter of declaration of the results within another two weeks. 17 Needless also to say that the Board of School Education and Gurukul University Vrindaban will also take into consideration the peculiar facts of this case in the sense that the writ petitioner-Student had completed five semesters and only then the objection was raised. The Board of School Education will also take into consideration Annexure 6-A to 6-C and Annexure PX, certificate to the effect that Pandit Course is recognized by the U.P. Secondary Board as well as by other reputed institutions. In the unlikely event of University not furnishing the required materials within the time indicated above, it will be open to the writ petitioner to produce the relevant materials before the Board, so that the Board will be in a position to take a decision in the matter. Petition stands disposed of. Dasti to all parties concerned. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice March 25, 2010(s/sl) ( Justice R.B. Misra ), Judge