1 APL 921.11.sxw JPP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 921 OF 2011 Mr. Mahendrakumar Pukhraj Jain & Anr. ... Applicants. V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents. Mr. Niranjan Mundargi for the Applicants. Mrs. R.V. Newton, APP for the State. Mr. Abhishek Yende for the Respondent 2. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 09th SEPTEMBER 2011. P.C. :- Heard learned Counsel for the Accused - Applicants and the learned Counsel for Respondent No.2. Parties are present identified by the respective Counsels. The dispute between the two real brothers on apportionment of the property has lodged in a Criminal prosecution giving rise to FIR No.140 of 2011 dated 23rd May 2011 for an offence punishable under Sections 406, 420.467, 468, 471 r/w. 34 of I.P.C. 2. Respondent No.2 accepts that he is secured with his brother Lalitkumar and has settled the controversy. He is not disputing about the purported signature or he is not challenging the authority of C.A. Mr. Jagdish Khokhani. 2 APL 921.11.sxw 3. In the light of above situation, in terms of Section 482 of Cr.P.C., the proceedings moved by Respondent No.2 are quashed and set aside. Bail bond cancelled. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)