IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 22746 of 2007 Between: Appana Mallikharjuna Rao S/o.late Appana Ranga Rao R/o.D.No.9-16-5, Gunduvari Street, Rajahmundry, E.G. District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Endowments, Tilak Road, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Commissioner of Endowments, Kakinada, E.G. District. 3 The Assistant Commissioner of Endowments, Danavaipet, Rajahmundry, E.G. District. 4 The Executive Officer & Manager, National Senior Basic School, Danavaipet, Rajahmundry, E.G. District. 5 Katiki Kumara Swamy S/o.Latchanna R/o.Sumapriya Finance, Near Saikrishna Theatre, Rajahmundry, E.G. District. 6 Talasetala Naga Raju S/o.Late Appa Rao Rajahmundry, E.G. District. 7 Grandhi Chandrasekhar S/o.Papa Rao Coffee Maker, Main Road, Rajahmundry, E.G. District. 8 Jakka Pattabhiramayya S/o.Subrahmanyam Rajahmundry, E.G. District. 9 Smt.Denupati Anantha Lakshmi W/o.Venkataramana Rajahmundry, E.G. District. 10 Polaki Parameswara Rao S/o.Appa Rao Rajahmundry, E.G. District. 11 Bura Chandramouli S/o.Ramakrishna Rao T. Nagar, Rajahmundry, E.G. District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, declaring the proceedings of the Commissioner, Endowments Department, A.P., Hyderabad i.e., 1st Respondent herein in RC No.G1/46844/2006 dated 8.10.2006 as wholly arbitrary, illegal, unjust and unsustainable being violative of Articles of the Constitution of India and oppose to the mandatory provisions of Sec. 17 of A.P. Act 30/87 and quash the said proceedings and pass such other or further order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.LAKSHMANA SARMA Counsel for the Respondents No.: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt: 12.09.2008. kdl