IN THE HIGH CQURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. '?£& /2006 PETITIONER:- / Damodar Sing^i Yadav Son of Shri .••*' x..'<- \a ^.•••.^•l',/' >'\f''''i<y ..••''' ^.-^ :)^^^ ^yy ^ /•'iiYif' G^hanshyam Yadav, aged about 46 years, ^ <? Occupation Sub Divisional Ofiicer (In- Charge), (Sub Engineer), Rural Engineering Department, Tokapal, District Bastar (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS :- / 1. State of Chhatisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). / 2. The Secretary, Water Resources Departinent, D.K.S. Bha-wan, Raipur (C.G) / 3. The Engineer in Chief, Water Resources Department, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.). ^_,^ -•,.\\ "'A ^: I ^;%%^J ^-yii 4. Shri Aftab Alam Siddique Son of Not Rnown, Assistant Engineer, Office of the Executive Engineer, Water Resources Division Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.). WRIT_PETJTK)N UNDER ARTICLE 2^6/227 OF THE CONSTETUTLON OF_INDIA, gj^r.^jp3 XI-HC-78 <!•°<-^w^, ^w\<v, f^roy *ii+icir?h*iich W1T 200 311^1 l|d* (^f^sl^lST) 3TI^TWR-<i<*i awsn^TgwRi warwnfersn^T 'hiifM'ill-i tiit<cfl'^''tei^t'<Riwi< ^sTf^rsn^T ^l 14-7-2006 W.P.Nos.1000/2006, 968/j 974/2006, 1034/2006, 1173/200)6, 2929/2006. Petitioners by Shr-i P. Advocates with Kum. Sunita Jain, Rajesh Jain, 5mt. Yashita Maseeh^ Manoj Paranjpe, Advocates. Shri Rcyeev Shrivastwa, No.971/2006. Shrj Pankaj Shrivastava, c| W.P.No.1000/2006. Shri Vinay Pandey, counsel| No.1000/2006. State/respondents by Shri) with Shri V.V.S. Murthy & Shri 41 Shri Sumesh Bajqj, (Sovernment Ad\ Shri R.P. Mandal, &epartment; Shri N.S. Bhadori^a Oepartment; 5hri M.L. Haldkor, Rur-al Engineering Serv'ices: Shri PM6SY, Circle: Raipur & Off'icer^in Executive Eryineer, Water {006, 970/2006. 971/2006, 973/2006, >, 1182/2006, 1241/2006, 1242/2006 &. &iw<il<ar & Shri Manindra Shrivastava, Senior ^hri Afroz Khan, Shri Anup Ma2umdar, Shri on behalf of Smt. Hamida Siddique, Shri counsej for respondent No.4 in W.P. jiunsel for respondents No.12, 18 <& 30 in for respondents No.13, 32 A 42 in W.P. Secr^tesy CEt> Resouitces ifi; P.K. Verma, Additional Advocate Generai K. Beriwal, Deputy Advocate (Senerals and 'ocate. ', Panchayat <& Rural Oevelopment i, Er^ineer-in-Cliief, Water Resources ), C&RRDA; Shri S.K. (Supta, Chief Engineer, i.N. Shrivastava, 5uperintendin9 Engineer, in-Charge, and Shr-i Subodh Shrivastava, Depaf'tments <S Officer-in-Chat-ge are P.T.O. XI-HC-78 ^SvBf •^wicii), ©Tflo'is,Ptdltiy *<mcfTSh*1|ch W^ 200 3TI^?rt|a<»> (ytd°"i.!ST) sn^r^rf^TO? cpn'3n^ri»itf e^BTWBfersn^T /-; quasl(ed aihd t-1eard. By these writ petitions, th^ posts in the Depar'tment of Rur-al legality and correctness of orders the Sub-Engineers of Water- transferr-ed in the Rural Engineerin^ As far as the impugned o( concerned, same are already W.P.Nos.1103/2006 & 2921/2006 As for as the prayer* mode directect not to post any person concerned, Shri Pr-amod Verma <& Bor that the Oepar'tment is not deputatic.n/appointment/transfer Department which ar-e regular' sand the rules and are lying vacant. Therefore, in view of the and Shri V.V.S. Murthy in presence are allowed to the extent that thel be filled by way of deputation/tran| the other Departments. As -fw os the prcyer thot and fill up the promotionol posts first instance, the respondents ha+e >+l<<[cf.i)1.< WIcff ff f9^S rfSrezrc ^srf^ffsn^T i^ petitioners, who are working on various Ehgineer'ing Services, have questioned the |dated 17-2-2006 and 12-6-2006, whereby Redpurces Depor'tnient have been appointed/ Serv'ices Depar-tment. r-ders ddted 17-2-2006 & 12-6-2006 are vide or'der' dated 14-7-2006 passed in similor other connected petitions. (>y the petitioners that respondent No.l be ^in deputation in the RES bepartment, is S^ri V.V.S. Murthy made a statement at the going ;'o appoint any Officer by way of o^i any post of the Rural Engineeriry Services \}oned posts as per scheduled attached with sti^tement made at the Bar by Shri PX Verma |of the Officers of the State, the petitions existing post of RE5 Department shall not i^fer/appointment by brihging officials from tflie respondents be directed to convene DPC t(|hich are lying vacant, is concerned, at the alr-eacly made it clear in reply that they P.T.O. XI-HC-78 3^'siT'nrPT, ®Ti)tf'l6,(q<vliyy *<i*<Mrai*nqi ^ 200 3l1^?Ttia<*> (l?l^»t^iT) 3ii^rwf^(Ni <rar37i^T»i BRnwBfsffsn^r ^rafe^r WRTF ft'te'^t'(RfRR ^isil^ir.sn^r are going to fill up these posts. Ev^n today, ot the Bar", a statement has been made that the Oepartment 'is in the ^rocess of filling up of these posts by way of promotion, jn accordance with t^ statement, the relief claimed by the In the afaove terms, the e rules. Therefore, in view of the sbove 'petitioners' stonds answered. betitions ore allobved and orders dated 17-2-2006 & 12-6-2006 are quoshed| Parties are entitled for certilfied copy of this order. 5oma Sd;- L.C. Shadoo judge P.T.O. iK<M » hW*ellv.