,Y \'1/ /' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Singi^ Bsr PETITIONER W.P.NO. f 2-3-9 / 2006 - Devnarayan Bhardwaj, S/o- Late Shri Mangaturam Bhardwaj, ..•-•< Aged -about 42 years, oto.-<M-.-'" ..•'" ..••"'&'-'?•••'' ..••"'' R/°- viuage- Goradihe, ,9...;'0.<-''..••"'" Tah.-Masturi Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.] ^J^.^/ .••' •-^ o V ^'"^^ RKSPONDENTS: ^ VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, ^ Through The Secretary, Agriculture Department, D.K.S. Bhavan Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Up-Sanchalak , Agriculture Department, Jajngir Dist. t:' Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 3. The Dean Indhira Gandhi ., Agriculture Collage Raipur (C.G.^ * ^ 4^ The Sub Division Agriculture Officer, Agriculture Department, Pamgarah Disst. Janjgir Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA "•^0^^ ^l^ 1 vd-cq •^i<iirt<f, I»-A'(1<I<«,RrtKyi ^f fzZ^I^ 311^91 CRtp (4clij61'Ei) 3IT^?TcBT R'1l'<b BaiTgiT^n^qra; s^arfiR^iflgsii^n 5.4^086 Shri ^ay Deshumukh, coun^et for the petitiener. Shri Vinay F^ndey, Panel Lajwyer forthe State. Heard. The petitioner !s a Rural Aj higher studies through his cteparhtient. Accordingly, the petlUoner appeared in examinations, but he could not aiipear in 4 semester because of Ms son's severe brain fever. U is subnlitted ttiat thereafter fte peUttoner made representations as per Ann©(yre-p/7& P/8 with a request that he may be relieved so as to enabte him to jo been considered and decided jn in his Department, but the same have not P date. Leamed counsel prays Uiat ttie respondent authorities may be| representetions submittsd by the p^Btioner. The prayer is not opposed b' is given to the peUUoner to make) grievances before the respondent order, within a period of 15 daysj the petttioner may avail the remedy With the aforesaid observati^ Consequendy, M.(W.).P.no.< CerBfied copy as per rules. (pi<i[ci4)Ti ^i*ioT^'f^€S'tiui'i-cit ^aii^tTgn^CT rteultural Extenston Officer. He was sent for directed to consider and dectde ttie f tfie other slde. Having considered and wittfout expressir^ any opinion on ttie merits of the case, in the opinion of tttis Coi^rt, ends <rf justfce will be served if a direetion a deteiled representation afresh rasin®his 4o2 alwig with a copy <rfthe peUtion and this and on such representation being fited, the respondent No.2 shatl decide the ^ame on ite own merits in accordance wnth law as early as possibfe preferably v|fthin a period of 8 weeks from ttie date of receipt of the representation. It is ^nade clear ttiat if any grievance still remams, available under Uie law. >ns, this ptftlon stands disposed <rf. )56/200S also stands disposed of. SP/FS/2005-20,000 ^ ^ Sdf- Fakhruddin Judge