1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6672 OF 2004 Umedsinh Ramsinh Chauhan & Ors. ..Petitioners. Vs. The Administrator, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Silvassa & Ors. ..Respondents. .... Mr.R.C.Shah for the Petitioners. Mr.R.Ashokan for the Respondents. .... CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. 10th June, 2005. P.C. : In a suit for an injunction filed by the Petitioners restraining the Respondents from demolishing a compound wall, the Learned Trial Judge has considered it appropriate to recast the issues. I have perused the issues as recast by the impugned order dated 5th July, 2004. There is no illegality or perversity in the impugned order. 2 Counsel appearing for the Petitioners states that the issues which have been recast were implicit in the issues that were earlier framed. That is no ground to exercise the jurisdiction under Article 227 in the absence of any infirmity or jurisdictional error in the impugned order. The Petition is accordingly dismissed.