C.M. No. 1826 of 2010 and 1 CWP No. 3629 of 1997 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.M. No. 1826 of 2010 and CWP No. 3629 of 1997 (O&M) Date of decision: 04.05.2010 Kishan Dev s/o Sh. Vasu Dev ...... PETITIONER VERSUS Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Gurgaon and another ....... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. A.C.Jain, Advocate, for respondent No. 2-Management. *** AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL) The present application is for disposal of the writ petition in the light of the compromise entered into between the parties and in the light of the affidavit given by the petitioner dated 01.09.2009 (Annexure A-1), wherein it has been stated that he is aware of the facts of the case and the submissions made in the application, according to which, respondent No. 2-Management has paid a sum of Rs. 30,000/- to the workman-petitioner towards full and final payment as per the settlement entered into between the parties. C.M. No. 1826 of 2010 and 2 CWP No. 3629 of 1997 (O&M) This application came up for hearing before this Court on 17.02.2010 when a direction was issued to respondent No. 2-Management to file an affidavit in support of the contention made in the application. In compliance with the order passed by this Court, affidavit dated 25.04.2010 through Mr. S.K.Jain, Partner, Standard Rubber Mills, Khandsa Road, Gurgaon-respondent No. 2 has been filed in Court. The same is taken on record. It has been specifically stated in the affidavit that respondent No. 2-Management has, as per the settlement entered into between the parties, made the payment of Rs. 30,000/- towards full and final payment and, therefore, the matter having been settled, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Counsel for the petitioner is not present. The present writ petition, in the light of the settlement and the payment made to the petitioner, has been rendered infructuous. Ordered accordingly. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to move an application for revival of the writ petition, in case the assertion made in the affidavit dated 25.04.2010 filed in Court today, is found to be incorrect. ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) JUDGE May 04, 2010 pj