C/?Hm7/\ IN THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATrISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) ' WRIT PETITION (S) No. (:ILZZé OF 2010 Middle School, Dongariya, Lormi, District Bilaspur (C.G. J, 1. Girwar Singh Rathore, S/o Shri Laxman Singh Rathore, aged about 53 years, Presently Posted as Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Block ) 2.,/’ Ghanaram Dhruve, S/o Shri Chamru Singh, aged about 49 years, Presently Posted as Head Master, Govt. Boys Middle School, Ramhepur (N), Tahsil District Bilaspur (C.G.) .“ Ashok Kumar Lahaur, s/o J.R.v Lahaur, aged about 46 years, Posted as Upper Division Teacher Govt. Girls Middle School, Dindori, Tahsil (C.G.) / . Maheshi Ram Sahu, S/o Shri -“' ,_M{‘_‘Jaitram Sahu, aged about 46 years, Presently Posted as Upper Division Teacher, Boys Middle School, Ramhepur (N), Tahsil Lormi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Kalam Prasad Dahlre, S/o Ganesh Ram, aged about 47 years, Presently Posted as Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Boys MiddleSchool, Akhrar, Tahsil Lormi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Lormi, WWMWHM~V M V. Lormi, District Bilsapur PETITION ERS 3 ./ 4 6./ Pratapchahd Dewangan, S/o Shri Kodanlal Dewangan, aged about 44 years, Presently Posted as Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middie School, Vicharpur, Tahsii Lormi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Shri ma,m zqw_m_.‘..j 7.“ Prabhu ‘Ram Sahu, S/o Motlram Sahu aged about 44 years Presently Posted as Upper DIVIsIon Teacher Girls Middle School, Ramhepur (N), Tahsil Lormi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 8f Puneet Ram Rathore, S/o Panguram Rathore, aged bout 52 years, Presently Posted as Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Dongariya, Tahsil Lormi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 9t Sadanlal Rathore, S/o Brijram, aged about L17 years, Presently Posted as Head Master, Govt Primary School, Dongariya, TahSll Lormi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) (1,0 -Ramadheen Chouhan, S/o Kheduram Chauhan, aged about 55 years, Presently Posted as Head Master Primary School, Raliya, Block Masturi, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) Sammar Singh Kanwar, S/o Shri Nammu Singh Kanwar aged about 47 years, Presently Posted as Head Master, Govt Primary School Kachaar, Block Masturi Tahsrl and District'Bllaspur (C.G.) y», f ‘ 2, VERSUS /. 1f" state of Chhattisgarh: Through: the Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. f/ Director Public Instructions, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3.’/ District Education Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) . KBIock Education Officer, Lormi District Bilaspur (C.G.) 5.’ Block Education Officer, Masturi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) REPNDENTS SO WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 4 , 31W m H:.€.«...m>.)..§xar1rsé W 200 [ca ‘ WW @W mmmm‘w ‘ aqmm SB : HOE’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRE’I IHKER DIWAKER 09.12.2010 Shri P.P.Sahu, counsel for the petiu'oners. Shri Praveen Das, Dy. GA. for the Stat Counsel appearing for the titioners submits that. the petitioners who were appointed on post of Assistant Teacher under the School Educau'on De nt in the year between 1986- 1989 is aggrieved by the acti n of the respondents in not. adding two advance increments in heir salary even though they did their D.Ed. from the Board of t econdary Education at their own c'ost after seeking permissi n for the same from the department Counsel for the parties do not dispute that the controversy involved in this petit is squarely covered by the t Kumar Eharadaj Vs. Another (2006 (m MPJR a Vs. The Govt. of . 4130/2005). State submits that in the ‘t Counsel appearing for the event, the petitioners’ make a rep i order in the matter of Yas Municipal Corporation, Durg CG.96) 85 Gopesh Kumar Chhattisgarh as Another (W348) entation, the same will be t ' considered and decided in accor e with law and in the light } of the decisions of this Court in th s d c matter of Yashwant kumar _ 1 four weeks &om the date of receipt of the rep esentation. ng survives in this petition '1 and the same is accordingly dispos d of. In view of the foregoing, no I We it a e e p e n m o h V i mmmw 1t is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on men'ts of the case and the authon‘ty concerned representation strictly in would be at libm'ty to decide th: accordance with law, considering an the aepects of the case. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge [aw ?m