IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2328 of 2011 Between: Chenna Lakshmamma (died) and another ..... PETITIONERS AND Shaik Lal Bi and 12 others .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2328 of 2011 O R D E R: Originally one Chenna Lakshmamma and Chenna Ramadevi filed RCC.67/1989 on the file of the Rent Controller-cum-Principal Junior Civil Judge, Guntur against Respondents Nos.1 to 5 herein seeking for eviction and the same was allowed by judgment and decree dated 16.07.1992. As against the said order, the tenants filed RCA.13/1993 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Guntur. During pendency of the appeal, the first applicant who filed the eviction petition was died. Accordingly, her legal heirs Respondents Nos.6 to 13 herein were impleaded as Respondents Nos.3 to 10 in the said appeal. The said appeal was also dismissed on 19.04.2000. Thus, the eviction order has become final. Thereafter, the petitioners herein alone filed E.P.1/2006 for execution of RCC for delivery of possession without impleading the other legal heirs. Therefore, the other legal heirs who are Respondents Nos.6 to 13 herein filed E.A.150/2006 in E.P.1/2006 in RCC.67/1989 and the learned Rent Controller-cum-Principal Junior Civil Judge, Guntur by order dated 09.07.2007 allowed the said application on the ground that when the appeal proceedings were pending, the petitioners therein were impleaded as legal heirs of the deceased first applicant in RCA.13/1993, and therefore, they are the proper and necessary parties. As against the said order dated 09.07.2007 as well as against the order dated 28.09.2007 made in E.A.151/2006, the petitioners herein filed two civil revision petitions i.e. CRPs.5570/2007 and 201/2008 before this Court, and this Court dismissed both the revision petitions by a common order dated 14.08.2008, with an observation that it is open for the petitioner to raise all her objections at the time of final disposal of the execution proceedings. Now, the Executing Court ordered E.P.1/2006 and also by order dated 14.06.2011 directed to prepare fresh delivery warrant according to decree in RCA.13/1993 and delivery shall be effected in favour of all decree holders i.e. original decree holder No.2 as well as decree holders Nos.3 to 10 who are impleaded as legal heirs of the deceased first decree holder. Aggrieved by the same, this civil revision petition is filed claiming independent title over the suit schedule property. I am of the opinion that the petitioner is not entitled to get any relief in a suit filed for eviction by the landlords. The Rent Controller is not entitled to decide the title among the decree holders who have obtained the decree of eviction. I do not see any infirmity legal or otherwise to interfere with the impugned order. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 15.07.2011 Dsr