IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.24341-M of 2010 Date of Decision:9.3.2011 Gayatri and another .... Petitioners Versus UT, Chandigarh & others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. H.P.S. Ishar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Hemant Bassi, Advocate for U.T. Chandigarh. Mr. Suresh Pal, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners and also directing respondents No.4 and 5 not to interfere in the personal lives of the petitioners. Upon notice, reply has been filed on behalf of respondents No. 4 and 5. As per the said reply, it is not disputed that as on date, petitioner No.1 is major. It is further stated by the learned counsel for the private respondents that respondents No.4 and 5 have no objection to the marriage between the petitioners and they need not have any fear. It is further stated that respondents No.4 and 5 shall not interfere in the matrimonial life of the petitioners. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction that in case, the petitioners still feel threatened at the hands of respondents No.4 and 5, they are at liberty to approach the Senior Crl. M. No.24341-M of 2010 -2- Superintendent of Police, Chandigarh, who shall look into the grievances of the petitioners and if found necessary, take appropriate measures in accordance with law. 9.3.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE