IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28549 of 2009 1. SURESH RAVIDAS 2. Anandi Ravidas Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 18/08/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners are in custody in a police case registered on 16.1.1988 under Section-307 and other provisions of I.P.C. and 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act. They were granted bail at the initial stage of the case. The trial meandered leading to cancellation of their bail and grant of fresh bail in 2002 when it has been again cancelled on 29.11.2005 and they are in custody since 15.6.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has instructions to state that the petitioners shall be properly represented on each and every date in the trial including their personal appearance on the dates that the court below so directs for expeditious conclusion of the trial. The aforesaid undertaking on their behalf is combined with the direction that both the bailors must be the wives, father/mother respectively of the petitioners whose photograph and proof of residence 2 shall be appended to the bail-bonds. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail- bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.IIIrd, Nawada in Sessions Trial No.107/98/17/09 in connection with Narhat P.S. Case No. 3 of 1988. Considering that the F.I.R. be of the year 1988 let the trial be done on a day-to-day basis and concluded at an early date. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)