.^' '• .:• y.1 ^ < '^-' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ECCL ASPUR M CHmTTISGARH .C.C.ND. ?l't OF igj^gj^ 1^®%^ "^WS' ®@®g^ 20( (Arsing out of Writ Petition Nb 1711/2001) PESTIONER : ^l. nahadev Sahu S/o Kaia Ram Sahu, aged about 38 years, it>rking as Guruji, at E.G.S. Centre Na^apara^ Gram Panchayat Pandaripani^ BLock Bilaigarh District Raipur 2» JuhariLal Tandon^ S/o Dhani Ram Tandon, aged ab3irb 33 yea.rs Norfcing as Gurwji^ at E, G» S, Ce^itre Pathariya^ Gram panchayat Bi sanpur^ HLock Bil ai ga rh Di strict Raipur 3. Ajay Ram patd, S/o DuLar Singh Patei^ aged about 25 years^ Wbrking as Guruji^at E. G, S. Centre Kaxmandi^ Gram panchayat Chiknidih^ HLock Bilaigarh District JRaipur ^ Ram Nath Sahu^ S/o Shri Mohit Ram Sahu^ aged about 26 years working as Guruji, at E<,G»S» Centre Lankahuda^ Gram Panchayat Sohagpur^ Block Bilaigarh District Raipur ./o0^ ^l^ o ^' 3. 5. 6. 7. ,5» Sat. Punni Bai Banjare, W/o Shri Pranshaxikar Banjare^ aged about 27 year working as Guruji^ At E. G. S. C^itre Tendubhata^ Gra^n panchayat Tiiaipaii^ Slock Bilaigarh District Raipur^ PEEFITIOKERS VERSI® The State of Chhattisgarh^ through the Secretary^ Department of panchayaty D,K»Building Raip-ar^ The Cfeief Executive1 Officer^ Janapad Panch^yat BilaAgarh District Raiptu:. The BLock aducation Officer^ BLock Biiaigarh^ District Raipur. The SaMapanch Gram Panchasyat Pandripani^ BLock Bilaigarh, Distri.et Raipur. The sarapaxich Gra^ Pancha^at Bisanpiar^ aock Bilaigarh^ District R^ipur. The sarapanch Gram panchayat ChiXnidih^ Slock Bilaigarh^ District Raipur. The Sarapanch Graa panchayat Soh^gpur, SLoGk Bilaigarh, District Raipur. ^ The Sarapanch Grain panchayat Tilaipali^ BLoc3c Bilaigarh^ District Raipur, e ODmmissioner mipur Di^ision^ Raipxir District Raipur. RESPOWENTS ^ APPLIC&.TIGN BOR RES2DRATION OF T PETITION !©. -^^— - 1711/2001 ICH HAS BEEN DISMISSED £DR KDN^ PRESBCUTJON O F THE CASE Q_I_jX U. 2QQ6 MY_ THIS __PLEASE TO TOUR ^GRDSHIP / c^ e petitioners named above respestf^Lly beg'to sufcroit as under s- '^ ^s !• That the petitioners named ah3ve have filei the writ petition No 1711/2001 challenging fcheir temination order passed by the responden-fcSi 2» FEhat tMs Hon'ble Co^rt admittei the case and the matter ^as fixed for hearing before this Efon'ble Conr-t. 3< Ihat due to in-advertence the coims^L of the petitioners ^ coiild not appear before the HDHtble Oourt when the i. '•^r^ &'--^ 1°1 ^ ^^.€ ^;—:; '^3.;n^..^^ i3S5j^]@lli:111;^;;i^.i^l'^l£ili3.X?^ HIGHCQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS M.C.C. No. 397 of2008 Mahadev Sahu & Others. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others, (^) APPLICATION FOR RE8TORATKMOF THE %TmON N0. llll/a)©l 8B: Hon'Me Shri Sattsh K. Aflnihotei. J. F ^sent: Smt S.Tiwari, Advocate forthe petitioners. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Pari^I Lawyer fbr fhe State. ORDEIt(€>RAI^ (Passed on 20th day of November, 2009) 1. Leamed counsel appearmg fbr the? petitioners $tibmlts that the counsel fi>r the petitQiners could not appear on account of bonafidemisiak^^hcTQfwQ, W.P No. 1711 of 2001, wliich was dismissed on 16th Nwember, 2006 may be restored to its file. 2. Reasonable and sufficient cause has been showii. W.P No. 1711 of 2001 is INNNNtNB—l^ restored to the original file, subject to payment of a cost of Rs. 500/- to the High Court Legal Aid Committese. 3. A copy ofthis order be placed on record ofthe wigioal mntpetitionmid th^ same be Usted for hearing. Ainit Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge