IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32070 of 2009 1. Md.Jainul, Son of Samsul. 2. Md. Shamin Ahmad @ Aslam Kujra, Son of Md. Jaimul. 3. Md. Alam son of Md. Jaimul. 4. Md. Hajrat Ali, son of Md. Jaimul. All are resident of village-Koilak, P.S.-Rajnagar, District-Madhubani. ………..Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ………Opp. Party. ----------- 2/ 29.10.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioners and the State. On the basis of complaint Case No. 1434/2003 Rajnagar P.S. Case No. 180 of 2003 was instituted for the offence under Sections 302 & 498(A) of the IPC. Petitioners are also named in the F.I.R. Counsel for the petitioners submits that though they are not the family members of the victim’s husband but their names have been included in the complaint case in the column of accused as they are villagers. In the complaint case also nothing specific has been mentioned against the petitioners. After investigation final form was submitted by the police but the Magistrate has taken cognizance against all accused persons including the petitioners. Considering these facts, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of above named petitioners is allowed. They are directed to be released on bail on their appearance before the court below within a period of four weeks from today and on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Rajnagar P.S. Case No. 180/03 2 bearing G.R. No. 1962/03 subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. Sanjeet/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)