i1? TE—EE 3E3}; SSITRT {3F JLTE{CATI’RE RT EiéléSPUEg CLG. WEI: PETIImiv N0.‘5l"74 was {Fetiéfag’g tmder agtgcge 23%;? / 3‘? 5f tim Caiiséi‘mii‘m: 9f Iniiéiz) “MW ' $4.6 mt to A. WRIT GF ?EH'§IQW INEEA FQR UNEER E33UANCE &R?1CLE QF 22$}227 APFRGFREJE Q? TEE CGNSTETUTEGN WEE? OF MANEJAMESI iiERTEDFhéRL OREERJQREERE. DIRECEEQNIEIR N ECTIQI‘JS ETC. PETITEQPJER : / x OA a way § a (2/0) www we“ Emaim Emma: Kghyap, 39:3 Raiixm Eashyap, egg: 33km: 43 yimm, UIJpcr Eiviaag teadmr, ai Bigck pra5‘em Eardsmimt, wagkmg 1'11 Gwafiigh Eakawand1 Schoei Q‘sétt. Kalawal, Ea5taf, C§Lha£€§¥grah $‘:&a{5\é‘v/ ......... 23w \()%. °‘ e‘:'&&a§‘y REEPiEEEEHTEia : Sme Qf Chhamsgaxh, maugh the Eacrstary, Raipm Depai‘tment {CE} of mm} Walfare, DES. Ehmam, 21,; {CE} Dittctm, trihai Ci}. W€1far¢ D§pa1imsm3 Emmi: 3);, g’ Iagciaipur, iiiigti. Cafmiligaimier Dim. 335w, tti‘nai Cg WEifar-a Dépamnmt, Caligaiai 533:3: at fagéaipm; Eisak: Ema; x /"V ’ Bakgwajid, Black Bgvgic-pméiii Digit. Ema: CG. E§ucaiion (Elia: Dhmim‘, Eistxici Cem‘cimamr, (1G. Tribal Waifam fjayamnani, XI-HC-22 £8 mw,m,W mam-nail; WJPdgxlék...‘ n1 zooS‘ Shn' Vishnu Koshta, CC Shli Arun Sac, Dy. State/ respondents on advam I.A.N2u. 6 192] 2005 This an apph'catiml ft taken up on board. This interim applicatim W.P.No.3174/2005 Hard Shn' Vishnu petitioner and Shxi Arun Sac State] respondents on‘ advanc 1e copy. I Learned counsel for n petitioner, who is Working on‘ has been transferred from Bakawand», ‘Distn'ct Bastar Welfare Department, Dhalm (Annexure P- 1)‘ He snbm order in the month of Angus; relieved so far. Learned counsel for th‘ that the aforesaid Order has i State Government and the ’se this petition may be disp¢ respondents to relieve;the unsel for the petitioner. Government Advocate for the 'e copy, or urgent hearing. ‘The matter is 1 stands disposeti of. Koshta, learned counsel for the , Dy‘ GovemmentrAdvocate for the the petitioner submits that :the the post of Upper Division Teacher BaJak Ashram Karpawand, Block to District Coordinator, Tribal an bV the order dated 2.8.2003 its that even after passing of this t 2003, the petitioner has not been e petitioner makes this statement lot been cancelled or varied by the Lme is still in force. He prays that tsed ‘of with a direction to the petitioner forthwith so that the W ............ . ................ mmm mmBffstam %;axf%wm 3.8.2005 XI-HC—22 3am;m,m Wm m"..n”nu..u.wn In 200, 3 mma1%a WW§WW agwm 62 ’} the transfer order dated 2.8.2 On the other hand, leaned Dy. Government Advocate‘for the State submits that h€ i3 not in a position to make any statement regarding eXistencJ.» of this order by 110W. He further submits that there is some Circular of the State Government by Which a person posted in a scheduled area is to be relieved after transfer only after joining of hJis reliever. If the State has made a policy for transfer and it has also made a policy for relieving bf a transferred person, then, no doubt that as far as possible, these policies are to be followed. .The orders of transfers are issued by the State and while issuing an order of transfer, the State is also under obligation to see that the orders issued, are properly executed. If the orders of transfers are passed, but ultimately no arrangements are made for sending any other person in place of a transferred person for relieving him, if he is workin petitioner may joinon his ne‘v place of posting in pursuance o O3. in some scheddled area, then the State is at lapses and the order of transfer passed by the State itself frustrates. If necessary arrangements are not there for sending any reliever of a transferred person in a scheduled area, the orders of transfers should not be issued or if they are issued and they could not be complied within a reasonable period, then those orders should be cancelled. m f