IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.3686-M of 2008 Date of Order: 20.02.2008 Mamta & another ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others. ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Parveen Moudgil,Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Navneet Singh, AAG, Haryana. for respondents no.1 to 3. Mr. D.R.Sharma, Advocte, for respondent Nos.4 & 5. RAJESH BINDAL J. The apprehension in this petition was threat to the life and liberty of the petitioners at the instance of respondent Nos.4 & 5. In response to the notice issued in the petition, respondent Nos.4 and 5 are present in Court today. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.4 and 5 submitted that they have no objection to the marriage of the petitioners. In view of the above statement of respondents No.4 & 5, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous. February 20, 2008 (RAJESH BINDAL) nt JUDGE