(’g‘wL_ EN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. s. No. $$§4/0F 2009 / PETITIONER Ranjit Kumar Sahu S/o Late Raj Kumar V Sahu aged about—24 yearS, R/o Beladula, Kharradhar Bhole Nagar , Raigarh Tah. 8L Dlstt Jash-gu-r (C G ) VERSUS Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.). RESPONDENTS 1.//S’tate of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, General Administration 2. Chhattisgarh Housing Board through Commissioner, Head Office— Shankar Nagar , Raipur (C.G.). 3f/ Superintending Engineer Chhattisgarh Housmg Board Ralpur (C G ) 4 Collector Ralgarh D1stt Ralgarh (C G ) 5. K,Executive Engmeer, Chhattlsgarh Housing Board, Project Division, ,Raigarh (co). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA M5 H§$H CGURT 6F $§%%AYT!SGH Kr BILASPUR §i—%0n. Mt. Jawce Px§€§nkar Eiwakea‘} Wrét Feté‘éiam (S; Na. 335% on? 239% PE?WE%R§ER * Raniit Kumar Sahu VERSUS RESPGNDENTS State of Chhaitisgarh and others. Shri MK. Sinha counsel far {he petitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur and Shri Shashank Thakur, PL for the respondents/State. WRIT PETiTiGN UNDER ARTICLE 226 GF THE CQNSTiTUTieN QF BNDIA oRDER {13m2009} finaHy. Wkh the eonsent of the counse! for the pames, the matter is heard ~ £21 fhis petition) the petiticner is seeking compassionate appointment as his father !ate Raj Kumar Sahu died on 24.5.2002. ii' has been pointed out by ihe counsei ior the petitioner that ’ahe petitioner has aireedy made an appiicaiion on 4.7.2002 for compassionate appointment bui the same has not been decided so far. Counsel foi i‘ne petitioner submits that the petitioner may be petmitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation to the authorities Concerned. A direction to the authorities concerned for early disposai of the representation has also been prayed for, to which counsel for the respondentsiState has no objection. Aocordingty, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. it is directed that if the petitioner makes a representation along with a copy of the application submitted eariier, within a period or’ tour weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the same would be decided by the authorities concerned within a further period oi two months from the date of its receipt strictiy in accordance with law. Nothing on merit has been commented by this Court and the authorities concerned are iet freetto decide the representation strictiy in accordance with law. i . r Sdl- l ' §§ Pritinker Diwaker Judge