R. S. A. No. 951 of 1996 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : R. S. A. No. 951 of 1996 (O&M) Date of Decision : October 06, 2010 Rajinder Singh (dead through LRs) .... Appellants Vs. Lakhmira and another .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. Chander Shekhar Singh, Advocate for Mr. Sudhir Mittal, Advocate for LRs of the appellant. Mr. T. P. S. Doabia, Advocate for the respondents. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Legal representatives of Rajinder Singh appellant (since deceased) have filed C. M. No. 7744-C of 2010 alleging that the parties have effected compromise Annexure-B and appeal be disposed of in terms of said compromise. Land given to the respondents and their brother Pritam Singh out of the suit land has been reflected in site plan prepared in compromise Annexure-B itself. However, since Western dimensions of the said land were not fully reflected in the said site plan, C. M. No. 8881-C of R. S. A. No. 951 of 1996 (O&M) 2 2010 was filed along with additional affidavit, wherein dimensions of Western side of the land, falling to the share of respondents and their brother, have also been fully reflected. The remaining suit land, as per compromise, shall be owned and possessed by legal representatives of the appellant, along with Jit Singh. Learned counsel for the respondents admits that aforesaid compromise has been effected between the parties. Learned counsel for the parties state that the aforesaid compromise has been signed by the parties and the appeal be disposed of in terms of the compromise. The appeal has thus been lawfully compromised. Accordingly, C. M. No. 7744-C of 2010 is allowed and main appeal bearing R. S. A. No. 951 of 1996 is disposed of in terms of compromise Annexure-B supplemented by dimensions of the land (which has been depicted in Annexure-B), as given in C. M. No. 8881-C of 2010. The compromise shall form part of the judgment and decree sheet. October 06, 2010 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE