IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12793 of 2010 MITHLESH PASWAN, SON OF MAKRAT PASWAN, RESIDENT OF GAYATRI MANDIR, BY-PASS ROAD, P.S. AURANGABAD, DISTRICT AURANGABAD. ---- PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ---- OPPOSITE PARTY with Cr.Misc. No.12883 of 2010 VINESH KUMAR @ CHHOTKA DINESH, SON OF SHRI RAM PASWAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHAROOB TOLE HARIHARGANJ, P.S. OBRA, DISTRICT AURANGABAD. ---- PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ---- OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 2 5.5.2010 These petitioners are accused in a case under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code and have remained in custody for more than a year each. The allegation is that some mobile sets were recovered from their possession. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the mobile sets do not match with the stolen sets. Considering the period of custody, petitioners namely Mithlesh Paswan and Vinesh Kumar @ Chhotka Dinesh are directed to be released on bail in connection with Obra P.S. Case No. 120 of 2008 on furnishing bail bonds of rupees ten thousand each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad subject to the conditions that (a) Both the bailers should 2 be closely related to the petitioners (b) That the attested photographs of the bailers should be affixed on the bail bonds and (c) petitioners should remain present on each and every date as and when required by the Court and if they absent themselves even for a single date without reasonable cause, their bail bond shall stand cancelled. Sanjay ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)