"g'T .•"•^?^11?1!111• :<sa!'"^:55yl!'M(l^M z* %s'. 1-...Y'-<; THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRTT PETT'ITION N0 :^^—-/2003 PETTITIONER RESPONDENT, '^f^^-' i^-"isi^' ,.y^" ^v^^ r.K.Narayanan son of late shri : V.'N; / Keshvan aged ahout -62 yeai-s, / occupation -Retired District Malaria / Officer resident ofMIG-70, Nehru nag£!i-, / Bi!aspUT:(C.G.) fc Vs y—1-.State ofChhattisgarh through: seGretary, gQvemment of . Chhattisgarh,public health and family welfareRaipur(C.G. ) (U'?.Directorpublic'healtharidfamily • welfare department health services Raii (C.G:). . '^^^^^^ ^ -S. Aceouritant General ofChKattisgarh;, yelldw building fafadih Raipur. ( G.G. $,• j2-4.i^hiefMedicalandHGaiyi-^^. -^ 01liicer,Korba,District Korba. ( C.G.) / ?. Joint Director Eund accourit a.nd pensioh Bilaspur. •fcy m :^i WRITPETTITIONUNDERARTICLE 226/227 CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ' -i;C&%c HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR Writ Ptetition No. 2146 of 2003 Petitioner : V.t(. Narayanan Versus Respondents State of Chliattisgarh & others 3. Sln^e Bench: HonTile Mr. Justice SirtlshK. Agnihotri. Shri Bhupendra Singh, counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Depuly Goverament Advocate for the respondents No. 1, 2, 4 aud 5. Shri A.S. Gaharwar, couasel for fhe respondent No. 3. ORAL ORDER (27*b July, 2006) The petitioner was appointed as Assistant Malaria OfiBcer in the office of fhe Health Department, Bilaspur ni the year 1965 aad thereafter, he was promoted to the post of fhe District Malaria Ofi&cer, Korba in the year 1983. The petitioner made an application oa 7.7.2000 (Annexure P/2) to fhe Chief Medical OfRcer, Korba expressing his intention to take voluntarily retireinent w.e.f. 31.10.2000. The petitioner was accordiagly retired voluntanly w.e.f. 31.10.2000. Leacaed counsel for the petitioner confines his subinission to the effect that the petitioner was not paid interest on fhe delayed payiaent of pension as well as gratuity aiid G.P.F. amoiint as per pass-book inaintained by the authoritiesi. ^: Bablu 73^ Leamed counsel appearuig for the respondents submits in categorical tenns that fhe iaterest due on ttie delayed payinent has aheady been made. However, fhey are agreeable to cousider the case of the pctitioner a&esh and grant interest aad other amounts Uke gratuily and G.P.F.,if due, ia accordance witfa. law. For fhe reasons stated-above, the respondents are directed to consider the case of fhe petitioner on the basis of the representation, if any, iua.de by hiTn wittun a peribd of two weeks aad dispose of the saine within a period of six weeks fhereafter, on its own inerit, in accordaace wifh law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed o£ No order as to costs. ' SA'- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge s