IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 3RD NOVEMBER 2009 / 12TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 30653 of 2009(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. AANMY ASLAM, AGED 20 YEARS, D/O. MUHAMMAD ASLAM ALI, AANMY BHAVAN, PILAPPUZHA, HARIPAD, ALAPPUZHA DIST. 2. PENKUNJU, AGED 42 YEARS, W/O. ABDUL RAZAK, AYROOR THEKKATHIL CHERAVALLY, KAYAMKULAM, ALAPPUZHA DIST. 3. MOHAMMAD NAZEEM, AGED 21 YEARS, S/O. ABDUL RAZAK, AYROOR THEKKATHIL, CHERAVALLY, KAYAMKULAM, ALAPPUZHA DIST. BY ADV. SRI.P.SREEKUMAR SRI.K.S.MANU (PUNUKKONNOOR) SRI.T.SUKUMARA PILLAI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALAPPUZHA DIST. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAYAMKULAM. 3. NAIZAM, PUNNOOR VADAKKETHIL, VAZHIYAMBALAM, KURUVATTA P.O., ALAPPUZHA DIST. 4. MUMTAZ ASLAM, AANMY BHAVAN, PILAPPUZHA HARIPAD, ALAPPUZHA, DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.M.MOHAMED NAVAZ FOR R3 & R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ. ----------------------------------------- W.P(C)No.30653 of 2009 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of November, 2009 JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph,J. Petitioners approached this court seeking police protection. Petitioners 1 and 3 claimed that they had been duly married. Second petitioner is the mother of the 3rd petitioner. The 4th respondent is the mother of the first petitioner. When the parties appeared before us the 4th respondent submitted that the first petitioner is the only child born to her in her husband Aslam and she may be given her custody for atleast two days. Accordingly we permitted Mumtaz to stay with the first petitioner for three days. Today the first petitioner, her father Aslam and the 4th respondent mother are present. The 2nd and 3rd petitioners are also present. The first petitioner submits that she wants to go with her parents. Petitioners 2 and 3 have no objection. We have also permitted the parties to interact with each other. In that view of the matter we do not think that we need W.P(C)No.30653 of 2009 -:2:- advert to any other contentions taken in the petition. The writ petition is hence dismissed. However, we direct both sides to maintain peace and refrain from making unnecessary allegations against each other and causing troubles to each other. In that view of the matter it is not also necessary to continue the proceedings in Crime No.1580/2009 on the file of the Thrikkakara Police Station. To secure the ends of justice the proceedings in Crime No.1580/2009 on the file of the Thrikkakara Police Station are hence quashed. (KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE) (C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) ahg. KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ. --------------------------- W.P(C)No.30653 of 2009 ---------------------------- JUDGMENT 3rd November, 2009