IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3149 of 2009 RABINDRA PRASAD, S/O LATE BALIRM PRASAD, RESIDENT OF SHUKLA TOLI NEAR HANUMAN MANDIR, P.O.+P.S.+DISTT- SIWAN- 841226. --Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH MR. ANJANI KUMAR SINGH, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 2. MR. ANJANI KUMAR SINGH, THE SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, VIKASH BHAWAN, PATNA . 3. MR. RAM VINAY SHARMA, THE VICE- CHANCELLOR JAI PRAKASH UNIVERSITY, CHAPRA, DISTT- CHAPRA. 4. JAI PRAKASH UNIVERSITY, CHAPRA THROUGH MR. MD. GULAM MUSTAFA REGISTRAR, DISTT- CHAPRA. 5. MR. MD. GULAM MUSTAFA, THE REGISTRAR, JAI PRAKASH UNIVERSITY DISTT- CHAPRA. 6. MR. RAJDEO SINGH, THE VICE- CHANCELLOR BABA SAHEB BHEEM RAO AMBEDKAR BIHAR UNIVERSITY, MUZAFFARPUR, DISTT- MUZAFFARPUR. 7. BABA SAHEB BEEM RAO AMBEDKAR BIHAR UNIVERSITY, THROUGH MR. ASHOK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, THE REGISTRAR DISTT- MUZAFFFARPUR 8. MR. ASHOK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, THE REGISTRAR BABA SAHEB BHEEM RAO AMBEDKAR BIHAR UNIVERSITY, MUZAFFARPUR, DISTT- MUZAFFARPUR. ---Opp. Parties ----------- 8. 14.9.2010 Separate show cause has been filed on behalf of the opposite parties. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the opposite party-B.R.A. Bihar University, - 2 - J.P. University as also the State. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that so far the claims of the petitioner against the opposite party-J.P. University are concerned, that have been met and the petitioner has no claim. However, so far as the claims against opposite party no.6-B.R.A. Bihar University are concerned, the same has remained. Mr Ajay Bihari Sinha, learned counsel appearing for opposite party no.6 submits that the necessary fund has been provided to J.P. University to make the payment of such employees whose services were transferred to J.P. University after the B.R.A. Bihar University was bifurcated in the year 1992. Mr Ajay, learned counsel appearing for the J.P. University submits that if the claim still remains to be settled, the same would be considered. In this view of the matter, the contempt application stands disposed of. However, it is expected that the balance claim of the petitioner, if any, would be settled by opposite party no.4 expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)