IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25852 of 2011 Krishna Yadav son of Dhani Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. S. Jamil Akhtar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar No.1, A.P.P. --------- 2. 8.8.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence u/ss.147, 148, 447, 448, 341, 342, 323, 325, 307, 354, 504, 377 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code and 3, 4 of Witch Craft Act. Considering the nature of allegations that the petitioner had inserted a lathi in the vaginal area of the informant for the reason that she refused to withdraw the earlier case instituted against the petitioner and others, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )