1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4331 OF 2009 Baban Maruti Gurav & ors. ... Petitioners v/s Ganpat Maruti Gurav & ors. ... Respondents Mr.Nitin P. Deshpande for the petitioners. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 22ND JUNE, 2009 P.C.: 1. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order passed by the learned District Judge, 3, Pune, on 9.2.2009. By this order, the appeal filed by the petitioners and the objection raised by the respondents have been dismissed. 2. The appellate Court has given cogent reasons for dismissing the appeal and confirming the order passed by the Trial Court. By this order, the Trial 2 Court had granted a temporary injunction in favour of the respondents since it found that the respondents were in possession in view of the sale deed executed in the year 1987 and the revenue entries. 3. In my opinion, when there is a concurrent finding of fact based on the material on record, there is no need for this Court to interfere. There is no perversity in the orders passed by the Court below nor is there any error requiring interference by this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 4. Writ petition rejected. ..... 3