$N3LE BEMEH BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP (S) No. 3&5 of2011 /' Smt. Prema Rajesh Manjhi, aged' about 36 years, W/o Shri Ram Narayan Manjhi, presently posted as Patwari at Kataud, Tahsil-Nawagarh, District-Janjgir~Champa (C.G.) PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS :1./State ofChhattisgarh, Through : the Secretary Department of Revenge, DKS. Bhawan, Raipur (0G,) 2.’#The Collector, Janjgir—Champa, District—Janjgir—Champa (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, ELI x H‘n‘GH C01 fRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPI 3R WRIT PETITION (S) No. 5205 ofZOll PETITIONER : .Smt Prema. Rajesh Manjbi VER Si IS RESPONDENTS : Stats of Chhattisgarh & Armhar. WRII PETITION UNDER AR'HCLE 226 OF THE CONSHTUTION OF QQIA SB: Hon’hle Shri Satish K. Agnihotriul. Present: Shri Gautam Khetrapél, Advocate for the pemioner. Shr£ Shashank Thaiwr, Panel Lawyer fer tins State/taxpandems. ORHER ORAL) (Pwsed on 06 day of September, 2m 1) 1. Leamed cmmsel appearing for the petitiOner submits that the petitions; working as Patwari at Kataud, Nawagarlg has been transfenad to Tahsil Malkhamda: on administrative grounds‘ Vida order dated 15.G7.2011 (Annexm‘: P/l): Shri Kharapal iimher submits that the ystjtioner was already engaged in Census work under the grovisitms of sub-sectimi (4) of Secticn 4 ofthe Census Aci, 1948 A (3’7 of 1948) vide order datad 31:03.2010 (Annexare W7) mad has fm‘ther been engaged as Supervisor for conducting the wm‘k of eoonomio and caste census 2G11 vide order dated 10.082011 (Amemxre P/7). 2: The quostion astowhether an employea engaged in Comm may be transferred before oompletion of Camus worlg came into comideration before this Court in Chandrilm Pmsad Smha 1/: State 0f Chhamsgarh’ and other connected mama}. This Court, having considered ali the asyeots of the matter; held that 2m emyloyee engaged 1n the...Census may not be disturbed prior to its completions t V1 avv?.(8) A; 13o 34‘14 of 20‘? 0‘ éecioeo’ on 65.1 6.2131 U -1_ 6/ Accordingly, the writ petition filed by several smployees was aiiowed, Shri Khetrapal Submits that the issue involved herein is squaraly Gevereti by the deeision ofthis Court in the aforestaied case ‘2)» . Shri Thakur, learned Panel Lawyer agyearing for the Staie/ W respomems submits that there is no dispute with regard to the above Stated submission and as suck; the wn't. petition may be dieposed of accordingly. 4. Having regard to the fact situation of the case, the tmpugned arder dated 15‘072011 (Annewre Pil) in respect of the petitioner is qtmshed and it is directed that the petitioner may emrtinue at the same place till the work of Census is complete, UI Accordingly, the writ. petitiori is disposed o£ No order asto 90m. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge