IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3694 of 2010 SUNIL KUMAR SINGH S/O SHRI KEDAR SINGH R/O MOH.- SIDHARTHPURI COLONY ROAD, P.S.- MUFASIL, DISTT.- GAYA. …….PETITIONER VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GAYA 3. THE COMMISSIONER, MAGADH DIVISION, GAYA 4. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENRAL, MAGADH RANGE, GAYA 5. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SADAR, GAYA 6. ANCHAL ADHIKARI, ANCHAL MANPUR, GAYA 7. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, ANCHAL MANPUR, GAYA 8. THE KARAMCHARI ANCHAL MANPUR, GAYA 9. MOTI MANJHI S/O JITAN MANJHI R/O VILL.- LAKHANPUR TOLA, RAMBALLAM BIGHA, P.S.- MANPUR, DISTT.- GAYA 10. SHANKAR MANJHI S/O MUNSHI MANJHI R/O VILL.- LAKHANPUR TOLA, RAMBALLAM BIGHA, P.S.- MANPUR, DISTT.- GAYA. …….RESPONDENTS For the petitioner : Mr. N.K. Pd. Sinha, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar, J.C. to G.P.12. ----------- 02/ 21.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State and its authorities (respondent nos.1 to 8). In view of the nature of order which is going to be passed, no notice is required to be sent to the private respondent nos.9 and 10. It transpires that Encroachment Case No.11 of 2009- 10 has been initiated by Anchal Adhikari, Manpur, Gaya against respondent nos.9 and 10 with respect to public land of village Lakhanpur measuring 46 decimals of Plot No.104 appertaining to Khata No.388 of Thana No.287 which is described as Aam Rasta. It is also apparent that the said proceeding had been initiated on the basis of application filed by the petitioner and after getting the 2 reports from Anchal Amin and revenue Karamchari. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that about eight months have lapsed, but no step is being taken by the said Anchal Adhikari in the matter in spite of approaching the Commissioner, Magadh Pramandal, Gaya and hence he is constrained to move this court. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Anchal Adhikari, Manpur, Gaya to dispose of Encroachment Case No.11 of 2009-10 in accordance with law after giving opportunity to both the parties to place their respective claims so that the matter may be positively decided within three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. harish/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )