NsTHE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAR AT BILASPUR § W.P.(U/A.227),No. 5375 /2010 i ukundlal Agrawal, S/o. ‘Bharatlal Plaintiff PETITIONER Agrawal, a‘ged about 50 years, R/o. Shankar Nagar, L Raipur, Tahsil & District Raiiaur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1] /Smt. Lata Khatri, W/o.” Dr. Gulab .Deféndants Singh Khatri, through: N.D. Khatri, Sub-DiViSiOnal Officer, Irrigation Depaltment Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) At present R/o. Katora Talab, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2] /State of Chhattisgarh, through: Collector, Raipur, District Raipur (co) 3]/Manjula Devi Sethiya, _W/o. Pramod i Sethiya, R/o. 97, Hanuman Nagar, Kalibadi, Raipur, District Raipur : (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA I H ‘ HIGH COURT OF GHHATTISGARH AT‘BILASPUR §ingle Bench: Hon‘ble Shri Justice Ptashant Kumar Mis Writ Petition {227) No.534l 2010. Petitioner ‘ Mukundiafl Agrawal Versus Respondent Dr. Guiab Singh Khatri and others. Shri Manoj Paranjpe', counSeI for the petitionér. Ms. Sangéeta Mishra, Panel Lawyer for the Siate. Writ Petition under Article 22? o'i the Constitution of India. x Writ Petition {227) No.535! 2010. Petitioner Mukundiai Agrawal Versus Respondent ‘ Smt. Late Khatri and others. Shri Manoj Paranjpe, counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Pane! Lawyer for the State. Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of tndia. ORDER (04.02.2o1o) This order she“ govem the dispose! of W.P.(227) No.534l2010' and W.P.(227) No.535/2010, which arise out of one common origii order passed by 16‘“ Civii Judge Class-2, Raipur. Learned trial Court while deciding the defendant's application (2) $ under Order 7 Ruie 11 of Code of‘Civii Procedure has directed the X ’ " piaintiff to value the suit separately for reiief as to the removal of super \ hra' na ‘ \ x \