IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8811 of 2008 Raju Kumar Upadhyay, son of Om Prakash Upadhyay, resident of village Semri Upadhyay Tola, P.s. Palanwa, District- East Champaran at Motihari …………. Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar 2.The District Collector, East Champaran, Motihari 3.The District Superintendent of Education, East Champaran, Motihari 4.The Block Education Extension Officer-cum- Coordinator, Block Resource Centre, Raxaul 5.The Block Development Officer, Raxaul 6.The Mukhiya Laxmipur Lahumanwa Panchayat, East Champaran, Motihari 7.The Principal, Government Primary School, Bilaspur, Raxaul, District- Motihari. …………. Respondents ---------------------------------- 2. 16/08/2011 Admittedly petitioner was appointed as Shiksha Mitra in 2003 for 11 months. His 11 months contract ended and thereafter his engagement was not renewed. The engagement of the petitioner therefore ended in 2004 against which it appears that the petitioner filed complaint only in 2006 and not before. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the application of the petitioner was processed and some enquiry was made and reports were submitted. However, this Court is of the view that the application of the petitioner was filed after two years and thus the orders and letters of the respondents will not in any way 2 condone the delay committed by the petitioner in filing his complaint after two years of refusal by the respondents from renewing his engagement as Shiksha Mitra in 2004 for another term. This Court does not find any merit in this writ application. The same is accordingly dismissed. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)