APPP-501-11.sxw 1 Dixit IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.501 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.551 OF 2011 Pralhad Komal Yadav ... Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra, Thru’ Shivaji Nagar Police Station, Ambernath (East) ... Respondent Mr. V.V. Purwant for the Applicant. Smt. V.R. Bhosale, APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM:- A.M. THIPSAY, J. DATED :- 30 TH SEPTEMBER, 2011. P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. In spite of the fact that the bail order was passed on 14th June, 2011, the Applicant continues to be in custody, as he could not furnish a surety in the bail amount. It has been pointed out to me that the bail amount fixed in case of the co-accused has been, subsequently, reduced. APPP-501-11.sxw 2 Dixit 3. Under the circumstances, I am inclined to reduce the bail amount and also give sufficient option to the Applicant so as to be able to avail of the bail order. 4. Bail amount is reduced to Rs.40,000/-. The Applicant may furnish one surety in the like amount, or two sureties in the sum of Rs.20,000/- each, or four sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each, to make up the amount of bail. 5. The Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. [A.M. THIPSAY, J.]