IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1715 of 2010 1. Manohar Prasad Singh S/O Late Bal Krishna Singh R/O Vill.- Silve Khairma, P.O.- Gerua Pursanda, P.S.- Halsi, Distt.- Lakhisarai Versus 1. The Union Of India Through The Ministry Of Railway, New Delhi, Govt. Of India 2. The Chief Security Officer Railway Protection Force, Eastern Railway, Iiird Floor, Multistories Building, 14, Strand Road, Kolkata 3. The Security Officer-Ii (Howrah) Railway Protection Force, Eastern Railway, Howrah-Ii 4. The Assistant Security Officer Railway Protection Force (R.P.F.), Jamalpur, Distt.- Munger 5. The Chief Security Officer Railway Protection Force, E.C. Railway (Hazipur), Sonepur, East Central Railway 6. The Director General Railway Protection Force, Govt. Of India, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi ----------- 02. 27.07.2011 This Letters Patent Appeal has been filed against the order dated 09.03.2010 passed by the learned Single Judge in C.W.J.C. 11547 of 2006. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the relief as prayed for in the writ petition has not been granted by the learned Single Judge, only the writ petition has been allowed partly and rest of the relief as sought for has not been granted. Therefore, the rest of the claim which is based on the factual statement, cannot be scrutinized here. Therefore, we direct the appellant to make a representation for rest of the claim before the Chief Security Officer, Railway Protection 2 Force, Eastern Railway, who shall decide rest of the claim of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation and if according to respondent No.2 the dues is payable, the same shall be paid immediately. Representation shall be decided without being influenced by the statement made in the counter affidavit. Mkr. ( Prakash Chandra Verma, J. ) (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)