IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 17TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 26TH BHADRA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 5610 of 2010 () -------------------------- (CRIME NO.338/2010 OF PARAVUR POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT). (CRMP.2128/2010 of SESSIONS COURT,KOLLAM) .................... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED ------------------------------ 1. YAZARKHAN, AGED 19 S/O.ABOOBAKER, RAHUMATH MANZIL, KONGAL CHERRY PARAVUR-A5. 2. RIYAS, AGED 20 YEARS, S/O.MUAMMED SALI, VELATHALAZHIKOM,KONGAL CHERRY-D0-A6 3. MAHIN ABOOBAKKAR @ AKBAR SHA, AGED 19 S/O.LAHAR, SOOJIKAZHIKOM,-DO-A-10 4. MUNEER, AGED 21, S/O.MAJEED, KOCHUTHODI -DO-DO-A13 5. NHAZ, AGED 18, S/.MAJEED, KOCHITHODI -DO-DO- 6. RIYAZ, AGED 18, S/O.NOWSHAD, N.S.MANZIL,-DO-A15 BY ADV. SRI.V.VENUGOPALAN NAIR RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANTS: ---------------------------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARAVUR POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZE THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVINGCOME UP FOR ADMISSION, ON 17/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: VK V.RAMKUMAR, J. ---------------------------------------------- Bail Application No.5610 of 2010 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 17th day of September, 2010 ORDER The petitioners, who are accused Nos.5, 6, 10, 13, 14 & 15 in Crime No.338/2010 of Paravur Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 427, 323, 324 & 354 read with Section 149 I.P.C., seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application. 3. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. But at the same time, I am inclined to permit the petitioners to surrender before the Investigating Officer for the purpose of interrogation and then to have their application for bail considered by the Magistrate having jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petitioners shall surrender before the investigating officer on 27/9/2010 or on 28/9/2010 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery of incriminating material, if any. The petitioners shall thereafter be produced before the Magistrate who on being satisfied that the petitioners have been interrogated by the police shall consider and dispose of their application for regular bail preferably on the same date on which it is filed. This petition is disposed of as above. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE skj