•B";U!l.,ll,.t.n!.l'I.SU;liW ill ,E ,'l BE- 0V ^ SlngleBench .,'111 'i .r.'-':l. Vs. ss K JN THE H QN'BLE HIGHiCOltRT QF Cl-fHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITIONrsyNo.'2^g^ 72009 PETITIONER: .<2^.1^? ^g^>i ^Y^-i"" ^o ^y^ Budhram Gabel, S/6 Majhaladau Gabel,aged a bout- 49 years,Occupation - Forest Guard, Khairpur Parisar,R/o Village- Khairpur Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) •%<^. AS6-" VERSUS RESPONDENTS; State of Chhattisgarh Throug h- the Secretary, forest Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C,©.). Awar Secretary, forest Departrne'nt, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipm (C.G.). District Forest Officer, Raigarh ^C:G:-)/.:::.:.' HemlalJaiswal, ,agec] aboiut- 49 , years,OGGupation - Forest Guard, De'/aripali Parisar,R/Q Village- Devaripa 1 i, Sakti Gircle, 3anjg ir-Ch a mpa, DistriGt- ,Janjgjr-Champa :(C.G.):,..:1: :.:: ,:; • • K- Bg: K ^..'- K^si K EK';; '. 'cK:.B: '11% ^. ' 'NS^ "•-„''•! :m^ 'i! f.m.^: .:...SSffK •ea^'::: 181 t® H M ^•'r'h Ks :lu1ni,Li—;3-^,,w ;»iS^&^i~": tiS^saSB-SsK 'i1 'lU WRIT PETITION U N D E R ARTIGLE 22G O F TH E CONSTITUION OF INDIA FQR TSSUANCE OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS/ DIRECTION QR ANY OTHER APPRQPRIATE WRIT !!!!'}![!- ilBs::s:sm ^tsesnft. p C—7< an^l ^T r<-4i'b ~ss an^i **4i<* 's'sr ^iwci^, •s'^-iwc, r^wwy. ^-...^:..&.^^>.......2^6^ NI*<CTt tbNiqi " /^tW •CT^T TI5I^ (1°lii'!<<iEt) TOnW^f?!! 311^1 SB : HON'BLB SHRI JUSTICB PIUTIWKBR DIWAKBR 31.07.2009 Shri Amit Sharma, counselj Shri Arvind Dubey, P.L. for| Heard on I.A. No. 02, whiclt The application is allowed| during the course of the day. Challenge in the presen| chW^-'ft'f ^W^ ^ fsl<d <f^^R ^aiRrtiaiI^T for the petitioner. the State/resp. No. 1 to 3. is an application for amendinent. and the same naay be carried out petition is to the order dated 30.6.2009 (Annexure P/1) passe^ by respondent No.2 ly which the respondent No.4 has been tran4ferred as Porest Ouard, Khairpur Range, Raigarh Forest Division, R^igarh. Contention of counsel for |:he petitioner is that no order has been passed in his respect whei^as he is holding the said post by virtue oforder dated 29.9.2007 vitjle Annexure P/2. Counsel for the State subinits that let the petitioner make a representation to the respondent I|Io.2 and the same would be decided in accordance with law. Counsel for the petitioner| However he subnnits that some ti his representation. Accordingly, the petition is| petitioner to make a representati< agrees to make a repnesentation. !me limit may be fixed for deciding disposed of with a direction to the n within a period of ten daya from from the date of its reoeipt. the date of receipt of the copy jsf this order, the same would be decided by the authorities conceitied within a period of three weeks ^^y Sd/- PritinkerDiwaker Judge Ai •?i]t—!it[rrnT-Tii^-