IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.39348 of 2008 1. BALDEV SAHNI, S/O RAMCHANDRA SAHANI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – KALWARA, P.S. – SINGHWARA, DISTT. – DARBHANGA. 2. RAM SANEHI DAS, S/O RAM DAS, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RADHIYA KULTI ASHTHUA, P.S. – SINGHWARA, DISTT.- DARBHANGA. ................................ PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR .................. OPP. PARTY ----------- 4 14.05.2009 Record placed on mentioning by petitioner’s counsel. It is pointed out that vide this Court’s order dated 16.09.2008 both the petitioners Baldev Sahni and Ram Sanehi Das were allowed bail but mistakably in the bail order only name of Baldev Sahni was typed and the name of Ram Sanehi Das is missing. In this connection an explanation was called from Kundan Sharma the P.A. who had typed the order. He has reported that as per his dictation book he finds that, both the petitioners namely, Baldev Sahni and Ram Sanehi Das were allowed bail but due to mistake name of petitioner no. 2 Ram Sanehi Das was left to be typed in the order. In such view of the matter this Court’s order dated 16.09.2008 is modified to the extent that in the last paragraph of the order after the name of “Baldev Sahni” the name of petitioner no. 2 “Ram Sanehi Das” will also stand included as one who has been granted bail on the terms and condition in the order. At the request of petitioner’s counsel, this order may be communicated through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. Kundan (C. M. Prasad, J.)