-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.7381 OF 2008 Ansari Ejaj Ahmed Mohammed Farooque : Petitioner V/s. Anjuman Taraqqi-e-Taleem & Ors. : Respondents ... Mr.N.R.Bubna for the petitioner. Mr.Girish S. Kulkarni with Ms Swati Deshmukh i/b. Mr.Sandeep Waghmare for respondent nos.1 & 2. Mrs.S.S.Bhende, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for resp. nos.3 to 5. Mr.Anilkumar Patil for respondent no.6. ... CORAM : S.A. BOBDE, J. DATE : JANUARY 14, 2009. P.C. 1. This is a petition filed by a teacher against the order of the respondent no.4, Deputy Director of Education, refusing to cancel the name of the respondent no.6, who is notified by the respondent-management for the post of Headmaster under section 3(2) of the MEPS Act. The prayer clause erroneously proceeds on the basis that the respondent no.4 notified the name of the respondent no.6 for the post of Headmaster of the respondent no.2. It is obvious from section 3(2) that it does not provide that the Deputy Director of Education shall notify the -: 2 :- name of a teacher. The section contemplates that the management will notify the name of the Headmaster to the Deputy Director. 2. At the hearing, Mr.Bubna, the learned counsel for the petitioner, frankly admitted that the respondent no.6 has been appointed as a Headmaster even though he is junior to the petitioner. From this it is obvious that the petitioner has a grievance of supersession for which there is an alternative remedy available under section 9 of the MEPS Act. In the circumstances, I see no reason to exercise the jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. 3. Accordingly, Writ Petition is dismissed. S.A. BOBDE, J.