IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 6835 of 2004 Between: 1 P.Rama Krishna, S/o Surya Rao, R/o Gogunta Village, Pedapadu Mandalam, West Godavari District. 2 M.Padmaja, W/o Ramesh, R/o Gogunta Village, Pedapadu Mandalam, West Godavari District. 3 P.V.Subbamma, W/o Pedda Subbayya, R/o Gogunta Village, Pedapadu Mandalam, West Godavari District. 4 P.Peda Subbaiah, S/o Sathyanarayana, R/o Gogunta Village, Pedapadu Mandalam, West Godavari District. 5 K.Ratnamba, W/o Seetharama Prasad, R/o Gogunta Village, Pedapadu Mandalam, West Godavari District. 6 K.Radhabayamma, W/o Raghavendra Rao, R/o Gogunta Village, Pedapadu Mandalam, West Godavari District. 7 G.Vijayasri, W/o Sri Rama Prasad, R/o Gogunta Village, Pedapadu Mandalam, West Godavari District. 8 K.Appa Rao, S/o Raghavendra Rao, R/o Gogunta Village, Pedapadu Mandalam, West Godavari District. 9 K.Seetha Rama Prasad, S/o Raghavendra Rao, R/o Gogunta Village, Pedapadu Mandalam, West Godavari District. 10 K.Siva Padmanabha Rao, S/o Raghavendra Rao, R/o Gogunta Village, Pedapadu Mandalam, West Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Asst.Director of Fisheries, Eluru. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Pedapadu Mandal, Pedapadu, West Godavari District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue order or orders or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents in interfering with the petitioners fish tanks to an extent of Ac.43-76 cents situated in Gogunta Village, Pedapadu Mandal, West Godavari District, as illegal, arbitrary and high handedness and consequentially direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners fish tanks Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.L.ALI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR FISHERIES The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI W.P.NO.6835 2004 ORAL ORDER Sri Md.Mubariz, Advocate representing Sri M.L.Ali, the learned counsel for the petitioners states that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for an adjudication. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _____________ G.ROHINI,J 25TH November,2008 *TSNR