THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3853 OF 2009 Dated 3rd September, 2009 Between: M.Lakshmi Narayana …Petitioner And Arukonda Ramdas …Respondent Counsel for the petitioner : Sri P.Prabhakar Reddy Counsel for the respondent s : --- O R D E R: This Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 CPC is filed by the petitioner aggrieved by the order dated 25.06.2008, passed by the learned Junior Civil Judge, Parkal, in E.P.No.11 of 2008 in O.S.No.88 of 2000, whereby the learned Junior Civil Judge ordered for attachment of the salary of the petitioner @ Rs.3,500/- per month, to the extent of Rs.81,900/-. Respondents 1 and 2 herein are the plaintiff and defendant respectively in O.S.No.88 of 2000. As respondent No.2 died during the pendency of the suit, the petitioner as well as respondents 3 and 4 herein were brought on record as his legal representatives. The suit was decreed by the Court below, by its judgment and decree dated 14th February, 2003, and while decreeing the suit, the Court below excluded the personal liability of the petitioner and respondents 3 and 4 and confined the decree to the estate of the deceased respondent No.2. In this revision petition, it is the case of the petitioner that in spite of the fact that the decree passed in the suit was confined to the estate of the deceased respondent No.2, the impugned order is passed for attachment of his salary, which goes beyond the scope of the decree. It is to be noticed here that the impugned order was passed as early as on 25th June, 2008 and it is also brought to the notice of this Court by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in the execution proceedings, the petitioner has already filed E.A.Nos.14 and 15 of 2008 seeking for stay of the impugned order and to set aside the said order, and that the said two E.As are still pending. As the impugned order was passed in June, 2008, and the E.As filed by the petitioner are pending consideration, I am not inclined to interfere with the merits of the impugned order and I deem it appropriate to dispose of the Civil Revision Petition with the direction to the Court below to dispose of the E.As filed by the petitioner. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of, at the stage of admission, with the direction to the Junior Civil Judge, Parkal, to dispose of E.A.Nos.14 and 15 of 2008 filed by the petitioner in E.P. No.11 of 2008 in O.S.No.88 of 2000, if they have not already been disposed of, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. _____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J Dated 3rd September, 2009 vrn