cnuaT nF MAPHYA pqqraqa AT «up. Nn.‘ ({Ww" a? 1991. IN TE H HH IG PETTTx$NER 2 rSantosh Frasad Mishra, aged about 9 year$ sun nf shni Indrajit Mishra,‘u.u.T./x Inharge—Directot, Bhakkar Bapa, AaiVas Kanya Ashram, archha(Abhujmad), District aastat,vkm.P.. Veragg l Wata Rukmani Sewa Sansthan, Pimrapa, Blgvrxgt Sastar thrsugh its Secratary 3hr Dharampa; aaini, The Regionai "ammissioner, Basr Tribalka Sheduled aeta, ta n Dauelop$5nt authari%y Jamaalpur, Flstrlct Baatar (M 9. The State cf Madhya Pradesh hrough 1ts Secratary, Tr1ba1 welfare Dapartmeht, Bhopa1,(m P ) 1 g‘ ‘ &a The Cullentar Ea$tar at 3a¢a1pur. ‘rTITT N UMnER ARTICLES 226/22 DF THE CUNSTITUTI$N IN1 P OF Q& FOR ISSUAKCF BF AN APPPHpRIATE UPIT FRDER ”IRECTIUNS ETC. / 3° ( 2 , c di ) / ). t " y HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI$6ARH AT BILASPUR Wrif Pefifion No. 4464 of 1991 Pemioner sun-rash Prasad Mishm Versus Respondenfs Mom Rukmani Sewn sans1han, Dimr-apal and others singue aench: Hon'ble Mr} Jush'ce swash K. Agnshm. 1 Slur-i Vishnu Koshfn, Advocafe for 1he pe‘rHioner. Shri Yashwan‘r Tiwari, Advoca‘te for *he respondenfs No. 1 and 2. None appears for fhe responden+ No. 3. ‘ 5hri AS. Kuchhawaha, éovernmen'r Advocafe for the fespondenf No. 4. ORDER The following order of The Cour? was passed by Safish K. Agnihofri, J'. (Passed on 7'“ day of December, 2006) ’ ’ g The pefi'rioner has filed fhis pefifion under ArfBcle 226/227 of fhe Consfifufion of India chalienging rhevaiidify of The Tmpugned order dafed 26.11o1991 (Annexure/B), whereby fhe pefi'rioner was served a mike of the fermination of fhe service w.e.f. 31" December, 1991. During pendency of fhe w T‘ pe'ri‘rion, fhe responden'rs had passed an order of wi‘rhdrawing fhe order dafed 26.11.1991, nofice for fermina‘fion of service, by order dafed 24.3.2006. A copy of The '11:? "‘”‘:‘T_A:§ugx /"\r order da'l’ed 24.3.2006 has been given +0 'Hqe pe‘rifioner before filing +he same in fhis Court Learned counsel appearing for The pe‘ri'rioner seeks for ofher reliefs in regard 'ro 'll1e release of full salary, arrears of pay, incremen'rs and bonus by re-fixing five pay in fhe revised scale in +his pefi‘rion Since fhe order of 1ermma'hon has been quashed by way of wrlhdrawal 'lhe pe‘h‘honer is af llber'iy 'l'o make proper represeni'a'iion before fhe respondenfs/au‘thorifies for ofher grievances, if +he same sfili survive On such represenfafion being filed by The pe'imoner fhe responden'r No 1 Is direcied fo consider and pass an appropriafe order in accordance wil'h law Wifhin a period of six weeks from fhe dale of receipf of fhe represen‘rafion. No order as ‘l'o cosfs. Satish K. Agnihotri r Judger Boblu