IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4347 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO. 4347 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO. 4347 OF 2006 in in in CENTRAL CENTRAL CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) No.374 of 2006 EXCISE APPEAL (L) No.374 of 2006 EXCISE APPEAL (L) No.374 of 2006 The Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane II .. Appellant Vs. M/s Ameya Engineering Works & anr.. Respondents Ms S.V.Bharucha with Mr.S.D.Bhosale for Appellant Mr.Jitendra Motwani i.bnPDS Legal for Respondents with with with NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4348 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4348 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4348 OF 2006 in in in CENTRAL CENTRAL CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO.373 of 2006 EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO.373 of 2006 EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO.373 of 2006 The Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane II .. Appellant VS Shri R.S.Kamble & anr ... Respondents Ms.S.V.Bharucha with Mr.S.D.Bhosale for Appellant None for Respondents CORAM CORAM CORAM : Dr.S.Radhakrishan and : Dr.S.Radhakrishan and : Dr.S.Radhakrishan and A.V.Nirgude, A.V.Nirgude, A.V.Nirgude, JJ JJ JJ DATE DATE DATE : 26th June, 2008 : 26th June, 2008 : 26th June, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. By this Notice of motion, the appellant is seeking condonation of 218 days delay caused in filing the appeal. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Notice of motion, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay and there is no case of inaction, negligence or want 2 of bonafide on the part of the appellant. Hence, the Notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). { A.V.Nirgude, J } A.V.Nirgude, J } A.V.Nirgude, J } { Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J } Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J } Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J }