‘ mm ....................................-...............uizoo “a?! W (W) mmm mmiifs‘am *mm W.P. S No.6033 2008 ETETIONER Dr. V‘K‘ Mehata, Sio late Shl'i B.L. Mshata, agad about 63 years, Rio Goushala mad, poHcs lines, Raiga'h (CG) Versus RESPOEDENTS 1.‘ State of ChhattiSgarh, Through —Secr€ta1'y, Gén€ral Administration Departmant, D.K.S. Bl1awa1, Kaipur (CG) 2. Director of health se1vice, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG) SCCI‘etz 1y of health service, Chhattisgarh, Raipur hr“ \VU) " Writ Petition Winder Art‘ 1e 226 of the Constitution of India S3. Hon’ble Shri Dhirendr- Mishra, J. 24—10—2008 Shri Sailjay Fatal, couns§1 for the petition‘sr. 8111i YS Thakur, Dy. Advocate Ganeral with 8111i P. Bhaduri, Panel Lax-war for the Stata H€ard. ‘ Grievancs of the puititic 1161* is; that 116 was appointed a3 AssiStant Surgson in the year ;971 ald as such he has put ijl more than 24 years of Service. He is entitlt d for two kromonnatis as per cimular of the State Govenlment as he has not been pmmoted during his long tenure as Assistant. Surgeor... However, despite his representation of v Annexure P~3, the responden ts have not granted two kromonnatis and LO 3 at ’4' W W,,W,—r=S/197—3/2008 —'4o,ooo. P ‘ @ WWWW W 111200 mw (Wu) WWW -Z/ WW Wm $31‘f‘awanéw sdec‘tion grad€ to the peti‘ per Circular of Annsxum P- : Eeamed counsel fc pressili’g‘liis p€Tition at thi 136111101161 to file £16311 re poncamed auihonty, wln representatlon w1thm Tha s Lsanmd counsel for mas representation far t] getition, the same shall b Annexufe P-2 and the radesh Vide memorandum dated 19th April ’ 1999 within a period of wo months from the date of receipt of the representation. In View of the ab e submission of learned counsel for the parties, the petition is disl ioner, though he is entitled for the same as 2, dated 19th April 2000. r the petitioner submits that he is not gv stage, however, he prays for a liberty to the presentation for his grievances before the i may be further directed to decide the peeiiied period. the State submits that in case, the'petitioner 1e relief, which has been claimed in this e considered and decided as per circular of scheme framed by the erstwhile State ,;Gove1nment of Madhya F osed of with a liberty to the petitioner to file ‘ fresh representation for his grievances, which have been raised in this i petition before he concer being made, the concerned authority of the respondents shall decide the same expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the r6 I ned authority and on such iepresentation 1’ y piesentation. , \\ Dhlrendra Mishra i Sd/- \ . Judge W