sa'Min" S KSi?ii;iSW ^l1t^^'lL-:^= ;y^^>-^ris IH TKE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITIQN N0. l~T.7^ /3005 PETITIONER o ^..i-^>e ....^;:£^^ >••'" ^ '•^'(!..<^ x^6^'"" ';>^\- «£.°- RESPONDENT ^-' ^ ^./ /^. "^t^.. .-'"' . "'s- "J- '^''^?'"^!?®^,'?' .^^^"^y ,.-^ Kgshi^ ' Vishawanath Rao Ja^av..,ag@ii about 55 years, %i^ -" .SSS Laxman Rao Jadhav. Residerit; of - Byron Bazar, Occupation - Store Keeuer, Govemnient Ensaneerine College, Raipur, Chhattisearh. VERSUS t^ The Registrar, Madhva Pradesh State Administa-ative Tribunal, Bench Chhattisearh, Abhuday Comolex, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226-7227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FQR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MAJIDAMUS^CERTIORARY AND/OR ANY OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OF LIKE NATURE [-HC-22 sn^rqir f^lWSTI^T Sh>li<D(lf?(T ^tlli ^"!Ti3 3^ -^WMf, anflu'is, fEldiy^ M^ch *11HMI sniKS 3ii^i Mach ..^.•B.l.7.70/ '•(• W]; 200^ 3(1^1 gWIW^tT 'errfed at30 3-5-2005 Mr. Roop Naik, counse! fo) Mr. Sudhir Agrawai, Pane!| Heard both the counsei The petitloner has preferrt the Constitution of india, malnty before the State Administrativ4 dscision. The petitioner's case is State Administrative TribunaU Adminlstrative Tribunai stands to be transferred to this Court, thls Court and decided. it Is admitted position notification to that effect has air4 already been issued that the pe^ this C-ourt and decided. Theretore, the prayer Accordingly, the petition is ailovi^ Rao Jadhav vs. State of wlihdrawn to fhis Court and b4 Registry of this Court So take app) !n view of this order, M. stand dlsoosed of. thls writ petition under Artlc.is 226/227 of |for wlthdrawai of O.A.No.468/2001, pendins » t'Tribuna!, Raipur, to t'nis Court and for th|at ha preferred O.A.No.468/2001 before the Bench: Raipur. Hov/ever, the State siished and the cases pending before itare therefore, O.A.No.468/2001 be transferred to =»>i<<Fi-t<fl-<iiifD ffte^<Ri«:i< ^srf^m'an^r the Defflioner. Lawyer for the State, hat the SAT has besn aboiished and a idy bsan issued and also a notlficauon has hdlng cases of SAT are to be transferred to ^a n^ae by the petitioner Is just and proper. vfed and O.A.No.468/2001 (Kashi Vishwanath Chfiattlsgarh and anoiher) is ordered to be iisted before thre CourS for hsa.'"ing. The [•opriate steps in the matter. )W.)P.No.1381/2005 and i.A.No.3380/2005 Sdl- L.C. Bhadoo (^y^) Bia