IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6309 of 2008 RAJU MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 02.05.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is an accused for offences punishable under sections 394 and 120(B) of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that neither the petitioner is named in the first information report nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his possession nor he has been put at the test identification parade although he has remained in custody since 01.11.2007. He further submits that the petitioner has been implicated only on the confessional statement of co-accused Timal Rai although the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition for bail is allowed. Accordingly, let the sole petitioner, namely Raju Mahto be admitted to bail on executing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Marhowrah P.S. Case No. 152 of 2007. MPS/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )