-1- mgj IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil application No.18 of 2007 in Writ Petition No.2948 of 2005 Shri Dharmapal Bapu Kamble ..Applicant vs. 1. Union of India & ors ..Opponents Shri S.D.Thokade i/b Shri G.B.Badiger for applicant. Shri R.C.Master for opponents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.N.PATEL & J.N.PATEL & J.N.PATEL & S.J.KATHAWALLA S.J.KATHAWALLA S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. JJ. JJ. 23rd October, 2008 23rd October, 2008 23rd October, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Learned Counsel appearing for the applicant/original petitioner states that in view of the fact that enquiry in the matter has been concluded the petition has become infructuous. He, therefore, does not press the application. We, therefore, reject the civil application. Needless to say that the petitioner is eligible to agitate the issue of punishment before the competent authority. (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (J.N.PATEL J.) (J.N.PATEL J.) (J.N.PATEL J.) -2-