1 APPLN 913.11.sxw JPP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 913 OF 2011 Dr. Mrs. Chayya Tated. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents. Mr. Hemant Surve for the Applicant. Ms. S. Rawade for the BMC - Respondent No.1. Mrs. R.V. Newton, APP for the State. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 14th SEPTEMBER 2011. P.C. :- Heard. 2. The transfer of Criminal Appeal No.530 of 2009 is sought from the learned Judge presiding Court Room No.34 to any other Court. 3. Without adverting to the assertions made in the Application before this Court or before the learned Principal Judge, City Civil Court, Bombay, the fact remains that the Advocate of Municipal Corporation has denied of associating the learned Judge in one and the same Chamber in past. This is sufficient to keep the usual faith in the system. 2 APPLN 913.11.sxw 4. Another feature pointed by the learned Counsel is Exhibits 4 and 5 (Exhibits B and C in this Court) are not yet decided. Perusal of the Roznama substantiate the same. The learned Judge has certainly to pass appropriate order. 5. On going through the papers and above referred clarification, I do not see that the learned Judge seized with the matter could have been otherwise influenced on conducting the case on behalf of the Municipal Corporation by a particular Advocate. Equally, the learned Advocate for Corporation should have desisted to issue a press note to which attention was invited appearing at page nos.43/44. 6. The Application lacks merit. Dismissed. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)