c^k- MIGH couirr OF JUDICATUIME eHMAmsaARM; BUJkSPUR SIN6LEBBNCH: HON'BLE 8URt4A®D»HBHN»LA,A».GJ WritPettttonNo^eSol PETITIONER Aditya Pra^id Tiwsul, &m of Ghanishyam Prasad Tiv^iri, aged about 27 yeare, r^ident of vlllage Amor& (Semra), Distriet Kterepur RBSPeNGENTS I. The General Manager, M.P. Stete Chfll SMppties Corporationyd, Bhopal 2. Assistant Managing Director, M.P. State Civil Supplies Cor^i^iUon Ltd,, He^l Office, Bhopal 3. The RegionatManager, M.P. State Civjt SujyliesGoq3GrattonLtd;,Bila pur Petltion under Artides226/227 of Constitution of tridia Present Shrr Awadh Tripathi, counrol for ttie ^tNten^. OIUtt.ORDBir {Pas8edwiaEPn4(tne,2«ir) An affldavit in support of the petition has bewi fil^t by Shri Awadh Tripathi, learned coupisel for the petitioner and he was asked to peply whether the paragraphs of writ petftion have b^n verified? Reply came in positth^ and the Court was informed that all the paragraphs have been verified. Mowever, after some time learned counsel for the petitioner informed that in the afRdsMl it has been indicated by the petittoner that he had ynder^ood the fects anct circumstances of the case snd this petition tos been ctraited on his instructions. 1 have perused the same. 1 clGnotfincfthatallthepar^irai^tso^ the writ petition areverified. Accordngly it can eastly te wttetthatthewtt - ^-Mw»»^4«C^^^^J^ petitton te notsupported by an affidavit and A^ilso did not pFBBsfer ftle an affidavit in support oftfte wlt p^itton; HenGe, the statement ma t&<^ teair%d counsel forthe petitksner is incorrect. In absenceof affidavitinsy^^rtoFthe writ petition, (he same Is not maintainable. AcGordingty, thew petttton ^ clismissedas not maintairebte. Sd/- Ag. Chief Justice