IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH w.P.(S) No. éézé 12006 /: Ramchhabile Yadav, S/o. Shri Bhagwat i Yadav, aged about 44 years, Assistant @(5 ‘pv ‘ Teacher, Govt. Middle School- @g) Vrindanagar, Camp-I Bhilai, \0" bv‘};4< K6 /\\’ Distt. — Durg (C.G.) II Q PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS . / -1. State of Chhattisgrh, t _ Through — The Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) , 2. The Director, Public Instruction Department, Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur District Education Officer Durg, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Durg Distt. - Durg (C.G.), t . “1' RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/ OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA , : W XI—HC-78 EW,W,W ‘ («WWW mama; a1 20M mm (W) mam WWW matmm WW§WW - %alf§msn%31 ' ’ 06.12.2006 Shri Vipin Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Vinay Pandey, Ierar ed P.L. for the State/respondents. The grievance of the p itioner is that he is Assistant Teacher with the qualification of gradua ion in Science subject. As per Circuiar dated 20.1 .1987 of Annexure /4 the State Government has decided that the vacancies of 5000 tea hers are being filled up by the teachers of English and Science subjects. These vacancies are being filled up through direct recruitment. Hc teachers who are already wor quota should be fixed 'for ther that division-wise list cf the sci basis of eligibility they shall be the case of the petitioner for prr imotion has not been considered. wever, considering the demand of the king under the State that a separate n, the State Government has decided ence teachers be prepared and on the considered for promotion. However, Learned counsel for the i petitioner submits that the petitioner had preferred representation wide Annexure P/6 for his promotion but idered. He further submits that in the same has not been cons identical matters this Court vidr a order dated 9‘“ October 2006 passed ‘ ‘3’:f.'.....€€% ...... mm a 2004 mm (W) am‘awrm mmm WWW WW§WW §m§wm in W.P.No. 499l05, has dispo 5ed of the petition with a direction that respondent No. 1 i.e. Stat e of Chhattisgarh shall decide the representation preferred by th a petitioner and dispose of the same at a period of three months from the date an early date preferably within of communication of that 0rd er in accordance with law, keeping in the State Govt. as also the directions mind the circulars issued by given by the Tribunal in similar matters. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit and admit that this case being similar in na1 ;ure is squarely covered by the above decision. ln view of the above 5L bmission, this petition is disposed of in the same terms. No order as t o costs. Sd/— Dhirendra Mishra . Judge P.T.O.