1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 9859 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 9859 OF 2010 Rajani Vishwas Joglekar Versus Bharat Ganpat Kolapkar and another *** 1. Heard respective counsel. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that in an unfortunate situation, the cross could not be effected and hence adjournment was sought. The petitioner is ready and willing to pay reasonable costs to respondent No.1 and an opportunity of cross should be made available. Learned counsel for Respondent NO.1 states that if costs of Rs.5,000/- are saddled, the Respondent No.1 has no objection for extending such opportunity. IN view of fair offer made by the respondent No.1, I am inclined to extend to petitioner an opportunity of conducting cross examination of respondent NO.1. However, same shall be subject to payment of Rs.10,000/- by petitioner to Respondent No.1 before the 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 9859 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. trial Court by the next date. Subject to subject payment, the order passed below Exhibit-39 is quashed and set aside. If the costs are deposited, the trial Court shall permit plaintiff to cross examine the Respondent No.1 and shall proceed further to decide the suit in accordance with law. Petition allowed accordingly. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:12/01/2011. ans/9859