1 HisH coum‘ on: cHHAW;sGgR§-i: BaLA5PuR Writ Petitionis; No. 18m of mes P.K. Dewangan, S/o‘. Late Shri SN. Dewangan, aged about 47 years: mcharge Assistant Engmeen Janpad P?nchayat, Charama,> District Kanker(CG}. Versus State of ChhattEgarh, through Secretary, Panchayat and Rura} Deve!opment Department: Mamraaya, DIKS‘ Bhawan, Raipu: WW. 2) Chief Engineer, RUrai Engineering Service, Ome of the Development Commissioner, Civil Lines, Raipur {0(9), 3) Chief Executive Of‘fmer, Janpad Panchayai, Charama, Dist‘L Kanker (CG). Petitioner i i Resnondénts 1) .- Ir‘ru (Writ Petmon under Article 226 of the Constitution cf meia) SB: Hon’bie Mr. Satisii K. Agnihotri, J. $r‘esen‘i: Shri Virendra Sharma, counsel ferthe cetitierier. Shri Alok Bakehi, Govt. Advocate ferthe State. ORAL QEDER (Passed an 26-3-2008) With consent of iearned counsel appearing for both the parties, the mailer is heard finally. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that ihe petitioner does not want io contest this mai‘ter on merit. However, the peiiiioner be granted liberty to make a representation before the appropriate authority. 3) it is ordered as prayed for. 4i 'This petition is disposed of with the above liberty. in the event, representation is made, t‘ re same may ‘oe considereo‘ and decided in accordance with Saw on its own merit within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a representation Consequentiy, I.A.No.1 stands disposed of. ‘ Sd/_ ' Satish K. Agnihotri ‘ Judge , Raju