IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15355 of 2011 Amrita Kumari @ Amrita Devi wife of Pappu Kumar Singh, resident of Village-Haluar, P.S.-Barauli, District-Gopalganj. .........Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. Collector Gopalganj. 3. C.D.P.O., Barauli, District-Gopalganj. 4. Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Khajuria, P.S.-Brauli, District- Gopalganj. 5. Poonam Devi wife of Bablu Pandey, resident of Village-Haluarh, P.S.-Barauli, District-Gopalganj. .......Respondents ----------- 02 09.11.2011 After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State the Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order contained in Annexure-6 in the background under which the District Magistrate had given a direction for a fresh exercise for selection on the post of Anganwari Sewika. The Court is not unmindful of the fact that due to certain declaration of law made by a Bench, the new guidelines stand amended and certain disqualification which came in the way of selection of some of the persons, which also has a reflection in the present case is no longer an impediment, as such. If that be so then there is no occasion for this Court to get into the nitty-gritty of the argument, except by holding that the direction of the District Magistrate, Gopalganj upon the District Welfare Officer that he has to now carry out a fresh exercise for selection be carried out. Both petitioner as well as private respondent no. 5 will have a right for 2 consideration and the new selection will be carried out in consonance with the 2010 Guidelines. This will be irrespective of what came to be decided by the District Magistrate, in the bundle of facts before him. This writ application stands disposed of with the above observation. Safik (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)