IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5564 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 21.10.2009 Phoolo Devi .....Petitioner versus The Gram Panchayat of village Anjan Thali and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Ms. Seema Pasricha, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) No one appears on behalf of respondent No.1-Gram Panchayat despite service. The petitioner is aggrieved at the order dated 7.9.2009 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Karnal, whereby her application to seek police help for execution of the decree for permanent injunction dated 20.12.1997 passed by Civil Judge (Jr.Divn.), Karnal, whereby the Gram Panchayat-respondent No.1 was restrained from dispossessing the plaintiff-petitioner from the suit land illegally and forcibly except in due course of law, has been dismissed. C.R. No.5564 of 2009 (O&M) 2 The petitioner's grievance is that the Gram Panchayat keeps on making abortive attempts to dispossess her forcibly in violation of the aforesaid decree. It is specifically stated at the bar on behalf of the petitioner that no ejectment order whatsoever has been passed against the petitioner so far under the Punjab Village Common Land Act, 1961. If that is so, there appears to be some substance in the petitioner's contention that she is being dispossessed by the Gram Panchayat without following the due course of law. The impugned order dated 7.9.2009 does not spell out the details of the eviction order, if any, passed against the petitioner at the instance of the Gram Panchayat. For the reasons aforestated, this revision petition is allowed to the extent that the impugned order dated 7.9.2009 is set-aside and the Executing Court-cum-Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Karnal, is directed to decide the petitioner's application afresh and in accordance with law with specific reference to the eviction order, if any, passed against the petitioner under the Punjab Village Common Land Act, 1961. Dasti. 21-10-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE