BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Eighteenth day of July Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.8001 of 2011 1 S.SIVA KUMAR 2 S.PUSHPAVALLI 3 K.LATHA 4 S.SHYAMALA 5 S.REVATHY 6 S.SENTHIL 7 A.SATHYA PRIYA ...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED-A1 TO A7 TMT.SASIKALA ...INTERVENOR Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUVERUMBUR, TRICHY. CRIME NO.9 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. N.SANKAR GANESH Advocate For Respondent :Mr.A.RAMAR, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) For Intervenor : MR.SIVA AYYAPPAN, Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 7 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 406, 498(A) 307 and 506 (II) of I.P.C r/w Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act in Crime No.9 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the first petitioner is the husband and the second petitioner is the mother-in-law and the 3rd,4th,5th and 7th petitioners are the sister-in-laws and 6th petitioner is the brother-in-law of the defacto complainant. 3. It is further submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the first petitioner met with an accident in the year 2009 and he was bed ridden and the defacto complainant left the first petitioner and went to the parental home. The petitioners 3,4 and 5 were got married and they were residing in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the matrimonial home and A7 was working in a bank. He further submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 4. The application to intervene in M.P.(MD) No. 1 of 2011 in Crl.O.P.No.8001 of 2011 has been filed and the learned counsel for the intervenor submitted that she was not permitted to see her husband and to do some duty to her husband. On the basis of the complaint under Section 200 of Cr.P.C which has been forwarded to the respondent police under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C., investigation is going on and hence, she prays for dismissal of this application. 5.Considering the rival submissions made by both sides this Court could find that A1 met with an accident on 15.5.2009 and he was bed ridden and the petitioners 3,4 and 5 were got married and residing at the matrimonial home and A7 is working in a bank. Considering the fact that on the date of occurrence, no one was in the house and though the petitioners were not arrested they neither interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction,I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.VI, Trichy, and each of them executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed sd/- 18/07/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.VI, TRICHY 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MARAAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUVERUMBUR, TRICHY. +1. CC to M/S. N.SANKAR GANESH Advocate SR.No.23434 rl/6c – 19.7.2011 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.8001 of 2011 Date :18/07/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/