IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 666 OF 2009 Ravi Babulal Kunchikorve ...Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent --- Shri Samrat H. Jadhav for Applicant Mrs. M.H. Mhatre, APP for State ---- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED 10TH FEBRUARY, 2009 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The learned APP for the State, on instructions from the Investigating Officer attached to Kannamwar Nagar Police Station, Vikroli (East), has submitted that no FIR has been filed against the present Applicant. The Applicant has an apprehension that he is likely to be falsely implicated in the complaint filed by one Vishal Patel. 3. It is submitted that there was a commercial transaction between Vishal Patel and Sidharth Pillai and the Applicant is nowhere concerned with the said transaction. It is submitted that the Applicant is being harassed at the hands of Vishal Patel. 4. In view of the statement made by the learned APP for the State, at this stage, it is not necessary to pass an order in favour of the Applicant. However, the Respondent, Senior Police Officer, Kannamwar Police Station, Vikroli (East) is directed to give 72 hours notice to the Applicant, in the event any complaint is lodged against him in respect of an offence punishable under sections 420, 406, 384, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and more particularly, in respect of the money transaction between the Vishal Patel and Sidharth Pillai. 5. Application is, accordingly, disposed of in the aforesaid terms. V.M. KANADE J.