1 Ash IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5803 OF 2010 Shri Satish V. Shetty. .. Petitioner Vs State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents -- Shri R.D.Soni i/by Ram & Co. for the Petitioner. Shri R.M. Patne, AGP Respondent Nos. 1, 3 to 5. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 1ST SEPTEMBER, 2010 P.C: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned AGP for respondent Nos.1 and 3 to 5. Various contentions have been raised by the petitioner in support of this petition including a contention that the offences registered to which a reference is made in paragraph 3 of the conclusions in an order dated 22nd February, 2010 have resulted in acquittal. 2. The learned AGP on instructions states that instead of keeping the petition pending in this Court, by setting aside the impugned order, the matter may be remitted to the 4th respondent for passing a fresh order on show cause notice. In view of the statement, the petition need not be kept pending and the same is disposed of by passing the following order:- 2 (a) The impugned orders are quashed and set aside. (b) The 4th respondent will consider the show cause notice afresh after giving an opportunity to the petitioner to file additional reply and to submit documents. Additional reply and documents shall be filed by the petitioner within a period of two weeks from today. (c) The 4th respondent is directed to pass an appropriate order on the show cause notice in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six weeks from today. (d) All contentions on merits on the show cause notice are kept open. (e) The petition is disposed of in above terms. (A.S.OKA, J)