IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-21427 of 2011 Date of Decision: 05.08.2011 Sandeep Singh . . .Petitioner Versus State of Haryana . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Sukhjit Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Vikas Malik, AAG, Haryana. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) This is a petition for bail in a pending trial case registered vide FIR No.384 dated 2.5.2011 under Sections 364, 452, 148, 149 & 120B of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’) at Police Station City Karnal. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that Sonia and Tejman were in love with each other, who married against the wishes of their parents. The mother of Sonia sent ten persons in a vehicle to bring her back from the house of her in-laws. She was taken away in a taxi driven by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that Sonia has been recovered, the petitioner is nothing to do with the family of Sonia and is in custody since 2.5.2011. Learned counsel for the State has, however, submitted that the petitioner has also participated in the alleged offence. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case but without making any observation on merits, the present petition is allowed. The petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) AUGUST 05, 2011 JUDGE Vivek