IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15610 of 2010 AMAL TIGGA Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 18.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that informant agreed to purchase a piece of land from the petitioner and other co-accused persons and made payment of Rs. 3,35,000/- but land was sold to others in which petitioner was only a mediator. There was no valid deed and petitioner had no interest in the transfer. Even then in circumstances stated above made him accused that also for the offence under S.C. and S.T. (prevention of atrocities) Act without ingredients can never justify refusal of anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 21 of 2010, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Purnia subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)