IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 22ND NOVEMBER 2007 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA 1929 WP(C).No. 34946 of 2004(I) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER: ----------------- T.RAGHAVAN NAIR, THODUVAYAL VEEDU, VIYOOR, KOYILANDY, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.AVM.SALAHUDIN RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, AGRICULTURE DIRECTORATE, VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. PRINCIPAL AGRICULTURE OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, CALICUT. 4. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, KOYILANDY. 5. AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHIBHAVAN, KOYILANDY. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. LATHA THANKAPPAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/11/2007,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO: 34946/2004 I APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1. COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT. 13/08/03 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE CHIEF MINISTER OF KERALA WITH A COPY TO R1 TO R5. EXT.P1A. COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT DT. 6/09/03 BY THE R1 TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2. COPY OF THE LETTER DT. 26/11/03 BY THE R1 TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P3. COPY OF THE LETTER DT. 7/11/03 SENT BY PRICIPLE AGRL. OFFICER, KOZHIKODE TO THE R1. EXT.P4. COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT. 2/1/2004 SENT TO THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R1. EXT.P5. COPY OF THE LETTER NO. A. 742/01 SENT BY THE R4 TO THE R5. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL. True copy tga KURIAN JOSEPH J. ---------------------------------------------- Writ Petition (Civil) No.34946 of 2004 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 22nd November, 2007. J U D G M E N T Petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P3 communication from the third respondent. Petitioner submits that he was discontinued from the service of the third respondent while working as Part Time Sweeper. It is seen from Ext.P3 that the petitioner was not regular in the work and hence another person was appointed in his place. That person, Smt.Manamal Leela is not on the party array. Be that as it may, it is submitted that the petitioner has approached the Government as per Ext.P4. Petitioner submits that he is entitled to be engaged by the third respondent. In case the petitioner has still any grievance left, and is still interested in pursuing the matter, he may approach the 4th respondent, in which case, the 4th respondent shall look into the matter and take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of the judgment along with an appropriate representation. The writ petition is disposed of as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. tgs