HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.LAKSHMANA REDDY TAKEN UP WRIT PETITION NO.13306 OF 2006 Dated:07.08.2006 Kurilla Kalyani …Petitioner The Station House Officer, Nellikuduru Police Station, Warangal and seven others. …Respondents HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.LAKSHMANA REDDY TAKEN UP WRIT PETITION NO.13306 OF 2006 ORAL ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.S.R.Varma) Heard the learned Government Pleader for Home, appearing for the respondents. 2. This writ petition is taken up on the basis of a petition, dated 07.06.2006, addressed to the Hon’ble the Chief Justice, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, by one Kurilla Kalyani, Resident of Chinna Nagaram Post, Nellikuduru Mandal, Warangal District, stating, inter alia, that on 10.05.2006, her parents forcibly performed her marriage with one Gujjanuri Ramesh of Inugurthi Village and that her parents, her elder sister’s husband and her husband are harassing her to lead marital life with the said Gujjanuri Ramesh. 3. On the last occasion i.e., on 20.07.2006, the petitioner was present along with her parents, her husband and her sister before this Court. Today, as directed by this Court, on 20.07.2006, the petitioner is present along with her husband by name Gujjanuri Ramesh and also her brother-in-law-Sammaiah (elder sister’s husband). The petitioner, who apparently is a minor, stated before this Court that she is willing to join her husband Mr.Gujjanuri Ramesh, after disconnecting all her relationships with her elder sister’s husband. The husband of the petitioner also accepted before this Court that he is ready and willing to take the petitioner as his wife and lead marital life. The petitioner’s elder sister’s husband by name Sammaiah, who is present before this Court, also agreed that he will snap all his relationships with the petitioner and will not create any problems for the petitioner to live with her husband. The petitioner reiterated that the petition addressed to this Court was not on her own volition, but was at the instance of her elder sister’s husband by name Sammaiah. 4. Therefore, having regard to the totality of circumstances of the case, particularly in the light of the undertaking given by the petitioner to live with her husband and the further undertaking given by the said Sammaiah-brother-in-law of the petitioner, we do not find any reason to continue this writ petition or give any directions, whatsoever. 5. The writ petition is liable to be closed and is, accordingly, closed, at the stage of admission. _______________ D.S.R.VARMA, J 07.08.2006 DR ________________________ P.LAKSHMANA REDDY, J