[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.2076 OF 2008 Shri.Vilas Hanumantrao Madigeri ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.Aabad Ponda, Hitesh Jain, Subhash Jadhav i/b ALMT Legal Advocates for Applicant Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JULY 21, 2008 DATE : JULY 21, 2008 DATE : JULY 21, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in CR No.369 of 2006 of Bhosari Police Station, Pune. 3. The applicant has not been named in the FIR. It is the prosecution case that a huge mob had committed rioting in which Chandrakant and Sagar lost their lives. It is the prosecution case that applicant was part of the mob. Sangram is the nephew of Chandrakant. The complainant Sangram is also an eye witness. Sangram has attributed roles [-2-] to many of the accused but he has not attributed any specific role to the applicant. The eye witnesses have only named applicant as being part of the mob however, no specific role has been assigned to the applicant. The incident is of the year 2006. Investigation in the present case is over. Looking to these facts, I am of the opinion that today the custody of the applicant would not be necessary. Hence I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant. 4. In the event of arrest, the applicant-Vilas Hanumantrao Madigeri be released on bail in the sum of Rs.40,000/- (Rs.forty thousand only) with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The applicant shall attend Bhosari Police Station for a period of ten days from 23.7.2008 between 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. and thereafter once in a week till conclusion of the trial. 5. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]