IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-4652 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : 30.03.2011 Vikas ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Navneet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana. *** Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Present petition seeks regular bail in FIR No.196 dated 01.08.2010 under Sections 363/366/376 IPC Police Station Kharkhoda, Sonipat. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that prosecutrix was in love with the petitioner and she was only one month short of 18 years of age at the time of incident. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further stated that prosecutrix had written love letters, which she has admitted during the cross-examination. Not only this, prosecutrix and petitioner got themselves photographed and all the photographs have been identified by the prosecutrix during the cross-examination. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana states that prosecutrix had already been examined on oath and other witnesses are yet to be examined. Therefore, this is not a fit case for bail. CRM No.M-4652 of 2011 (O&M) -2- Taking into account the statement of the prosecutrix and that the petitioner is in custody since 03.08.2010, I direct that petitioner be enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of trial court. Petition stand disposed of. March 30, 2011 (Alok Singh) sonia Judge