(^^ UZT^ /^ 1. INTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR rCHHATTISGARHl WRIT PETmON rSI No.: - ^^/ 2010 PETITIONERS: - 1. Smt. Stella Das, Age-52 years, W/0- Shri Deepak Das, 2. Smt. S. Das, Age-49 years, W/0- Shri R. Das, 3. Smt. AtPrassanna, Age-49 years, W/0- Shri S.Prassanna, 4. Smt. Sangita Bala Das, Age-47 years, W/0- Shri L.Das, 5. Smt. S. Kundu, Age-49 years, W/0- Shri A.K.Kundu, 6. Smt. C. K. Verma, Age-49 years, W/0- Shri H. Verma, 7. Smt. Laxmi Sarkar, Age-47 years, W/0- Shri K.C. Sarkar, 8. Smt. Geeta Yadav, Age-50 years, W/0- Shri S. Yadav, 9. Smt-V.Poul, Age-47 years, W/0- Shri Anil Poul, 10. Smt. K. Biswas, Age-50 years, W/0- Shri A.K. Biswas, 11. Smt.KaIpana Chakarvarti, Age-47 years, W/0- Shri Ranjeet Chakarvarti, All the above are by Post:-WStaff-Nurse// Posted at Dr.Bhimrao Ambedkar Medical College Hospital Raipur, [MECAHARA] Raipur, Distt. Raipur [Chhattisgarh] -:VERSUS:- ^ i. RESPONDENTS: - 1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department of Health-&-FamilY Department, D.K.S. Mantralaya Bhavan, RAIPUR, DisttRaipur (C.G.) 2. The Directorjri»,<{Sanchanalaya}, <l^Syperintend€-Ftt--s- Medical Education, Old Nurses Hostel, D.K.S. Mantralaya Premises, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Joint Director/ Nursing- Superintendent, Dr.Bhimrao Ambedkar Memorial Hospital, Raipur(C.G.) 4. Smt.D.Ashleshan, By Post:-WNursing-SisterM, Dr.Bhimrao Ambedkar Memorial Hospital, Raipur (C.G.) 5. Smt.Anju Sahu, By Post:-nNursing-Sisterw, Dr.Bhimrao Ambedkar Memorial Hospital, Raipur (C.G.) 6. Smt.D.Dhanlaxmi, By Post:-WNursing-Sisterw, Dr.Bhimrao Ambedkar Memorial Hospital, Raipur (C.G.) WRTT PETTTION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF DIRECTION (S) OR ORDER fS). HC-78 \3wi T«|<||«<|,y-^1^i^i<i, R<Awy^ _,_\p .^ ^ w. ^^-f 'Lo ^ O TTT^T^^T^ W^20 3TT^9T q^cp (tjc|ijc|«£{) 3TT^5Tct)rR-licb ^TT 3TR5T9^:f S^TTW;fff^f3TT^^T SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mo! 25-01-2010 Shri J. A. Lohani, counsel Shri N. Naha Roy, Panel Lc Heard. After arguing for some petitioners seeks permission oftt to pursue his pending representat Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, the petition is liberty. Needless to emphasize, they would be at tiberty to take re( law. Tumane cpi<ilo<i1<i ^ii+irtT^"fc^l ^Rt^i^ ^3Tf^T3TT^5T lan Shrivastava, J. <)r the petitioners. |iwyer for the State/respondents No. 1 to 3. ime, learned oounsel appearing for the |is Court to withdraw this petition with tiberty |on dated 18-11-2009 (Annexure P-5). Idismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid grievance of the petitioners still survives, )ourse to remedy available to him under the Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge