IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.906 of 2010 BINDESHWAR YADAV MANAGING DIRECTOR,BINDESHWAR YADAV CONSTUCTION PVT. LTD.R/O VILL-HARIRAHA RUSTAMPUR, PO- BELAHI BHAWANIPUR, PS-LAUKAHI DISTT-MADHUBANI--------------------PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH CHIEF SECY, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF (NORTH) BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES,DARBHANGA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MADHUBANI 5. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, WESTERN KOSHI ANCHAL, JHANJHANPUR, DISTT- MADHUBANI 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,WESTERN KOSHI PRAMANDAL KHUTAUNA, DISTT- MADHUBANI 7. NAVKANT YADAV, MANAGING DIRECTOR, NAV NIRMAN BIHAR CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. R/O VILL-EKAMMA PO- BASAMIYA, PS- LAUKAHA, DISTT- MADHUBANI 8. THE CHIEF SECRETARY, VIGILANCE DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA-------------------------------RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 19.1.2010 Let the petitioner add the Principal Secretary, Vigilance Department, Government of Bihar as party respondent. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Allegation made by the petitioner is that for award of contract for certain works to be carried out in West Koshi Canal Tender Notice No.01/09-10 was invited. Along with the petitioner there are other bidders. He alleges that the local authority in connivance with respondent no.7 one Navkant Yadav who is said to be the Managing Director of Nav Nirman Bihar Construction Private Ltd. changed the financial bid and rate of the contract. The petitioner has brought the above fact to the notice of the Minister of Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar and the Principal Secretary, Vigilance Department, Govt. of Bihar but no action is being taken in the matter. The allegation made in the writ application would be true or could be motivated but if a wrong doing has been - 2 - pointed out and the very categorical assertion has been made on behalf of the petitioner then the respondent would be obliged to get the matter verified or enquired into. This writ application is disposed of with a direction upon the Principal Secretary, Vigilance Department, Government of Bihar to get the matter investigated. In this regard Engineer-in-Chief (North) respondent no.2 would also be well advised to see that there is no wrong doing in the matter of award of tender under his district. The Court expects response on the issue within a period of two months from the date of production or communication of a copy of this order. This writ application stands disposed of with the above direction. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)