IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 5TH MARCH 2009 / 14TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 7111 of 2009(H) ------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- JAYAKUMAR.D, S/O.DIVAKARAN, MANAGER, `REEBOK' SHOW ROOM, CITY TOWER, VYTTILA, ERNAKULAM. BY MR.C.DILIP, ADVOCATE. RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, KAKKANAD, KOCHI. 2. THE SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF KOCHI. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CITY TRAFFIC POLICE STATION (NORTH), EDAPPALLY, ERNAKULAM. 4. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, KOCHI. BY MR.P.N. SANTHOSH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER. MR. PRAVEEN K.JOY, SC FOR CORPORATION. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.7111 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 5th day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T Heard both sides. 2. The petitioner's grievance is mainly regarding the alleged unauthorised parking of vehicles in front of his show room situated at Vytila, Ernakulam. Referring to Ext.P4, he complains that though he made the aforesaid representation to the 2nd respondent seeking removal of the unauthorised parking of vehicles, the learned counsel for the petitioner contends that there has not been any action on the complaint. 3. Heard the learned standing counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent also. 4. If as contended by the petitioner there is unauthorised parking of vehicles in front of his show room, it necessarily calls for appropriate action by the 2nd respondent. However, having regard to the fact that Ext.P4 referred to above by the learned counsel for the petitioner is one filed on 01/03/2008, I feel it only appropriate that the petitioner files a fresh representation to the 2nd respondent. WP(C) No.7111/2009 -2- 5. Therefore, it is directed that if the petitioner files a fresh representation before the 2nd respondent complaining of the unauthorised parking of vehicles in front of his show room, the 2nd respondent shall take necessary steps for redressal of the grievance of the petitioner. 6. The petitioner shall produce a fresh representation as above, along with a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg