{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.988 OF 2010 1. Arjun Babasaheb Dandait Age-32 years, Occ-Agri R/o Brahman Kheda, Tq & Dist-Jalna 2. Sandip Vishwanath Kakde Age-20 years, Occ-Education R/o Shivajinagar, Jalna APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra RESPONDENT ....... Mr. Joydeep Chatterjee, Advocate for applicants Mr. B.J.Sonawane, APP for respondent State ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 12th March 2010 PER COURT: 1. This is an application by which the applicants have prayed to release them on bail in connection with CR No.36/2010 registered with Jalna Taluka police station. It appears that the anticipatory bail application preferred by the applicants had been rejected and hence they have surrendered on 16.02.2010 and since then they are in jail. {2} 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned APP. 3. It appears that the said offence is registered on the complaint of one Sukhdeo Gulage against the applicants. It appears that civil suit bearing RCS No.316/2008 is filed from the side of the applicants in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Jalana for perpetual injunction in which temporary injunction has been granted by the trial court on 24.11.2008 and present complainant has been restrained from entering in the disputed land situated at village Salegaon. 4. Gist of the complaint is that on 08.01.2010 when he was returning from the court of Jalna, the applicants abducted him and taken in a car and threatened him to compromise or settle the suit pending in respect of agricultural land. The complainant was also forced to contact his wife on mobile and inform that he is safe and not abducted. Statements of the witnesses recorded during the investigation are based on the disclosure by the complainant and the same is not their first hand information. It is urged by learned counsel for the applicants, that the applicants are put in possession of the disputed land and the complainant is prohibited from entering in the same by the order of the Court, and hence there is no reason for the applicants to abduct the complainant and force him to settle the dispute. It is also urged {3} that the complainant has also filed a civil suit in which certain applications were moved which came to be rejected by the Court. Considering the overall effect of the facts brought on record, it prima facie appears that the applicants are implicated falsely. If it is so, then case is made out to enlarge the applicants on bail, though the investigation is in progress, however by imposing certain conditions. 5. In the result, the application is allowed. Both the applicants be released on bail in connection with CR No.36/2010 registered with Jalna Taluka police station on their furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each and on executing PR bonds in the like amount. The applicants to cooperate with the investigating agency and to attend the concerned police station, if required on written requisition by the IO concerned. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A10/criapln988-10