IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9634 of 2006 RABINDRA MOHAN PRASAD Versus THE CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & ORS ----------- 03. 22.08.2008 Petitioner filed the writ application aggrieved by the fact that no order came to be passed by the respondents on his statutory appeal filed on 5.9.1994. The inaction on part of the respondents therefore has forced the petitioner to approach this Court that a decision be taken on the matter one way or the other. Respondents have filed a counter affidavit and they have brought on record the order dated 24.11.1994 which has been passed by the appellate authority. They categorically state in para 5 that this decision has been communicated to the petitioner through registered post which would be evident from letter dated 1.12.2004 written by the Branch Manager, Patliputra Colony Branch. Whatever be the circumstances now that the order in appeal is available on record as Annexure-A to the counter affidavit, the petitioner has freedom to challenge the same before the appropriate forum if he is interested in doing so. The present writ application in view of the above said position has become infructuous. The writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to chart out future legal battle as per the advice which may be rendered to him. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)