1 CP273.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 273 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5036 OF 2005 [ Shivmurti Shanjarrao Gheware vs. Suhas Uttamrao Lungare & Ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. P.K. Joshi, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. L.H. Kawale, Advocate h/f Mr. K.J. Suryawanshi, Advocate for R-1&2. Mr. A.N. Nagargoje, Advocate h/f Mr. M.S. Bhosale, Advocate for R-3&4. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 14TH SEPTEMBER, 2011 PER COURT : . Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that, when the petitioner went to the office of the respondents, no proper treatment was given to him. Therefore, according to learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the officers who are holding high office and 2 CP273.11 key posts should understood the true spirit of the orders passed by the competent Courts and it cannot lie in their mouth that they have not understood the order passed by the High Court. Therefore, he would submit that, though unconditional apology is tendered by the respondents, this Court may not accept the same. 2. On the other hand, learned Counsel for respondent Nos. 3 and 4 submits that, respondent Nos. 3 and 4 have realised their mistake and they have rectified the entry which was taken earlier and they repent themselves for their mistake. He has tendered across the bar additional affidavits stating therein unconditional unqualified apology. 3. Therefore, taking overall view of the matter, in my opinion, since respondent Nos. 3 and 4 have tendered unconditional 3 CP273.11 unqualified apology for their mistake and such mistake has been rectified, no purpose would be served in keeping pending this Contempt Petition further. The Contempt Petition stands disposed of. Notice stands discharged. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/SEP11