1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Writ Petition No.3638 of 2006 Shri Zakirussain Mirasaheb Mutwalli Petitioner Vs. Union of India & ors. Respondents Mr.P.D.Pise for petitioner. Ms.Neeta Masurkar for resp.no.4. Mr.T.J.Pandian for resp.no.5. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & J.H.BHATIA,JJ. November 16, 2006. P.C. . Though the petitioner is challenging the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal dated 11/12/2002, he has duly explained before us the reasons for approaching this Court belatedly. . He had gone to the Tribunal seeking the relief of regularisation in the service of the Central Railways. The Tribunal on considering the reply filed noted that the petitioner was engaged on contract basis for typing work for forty minutes a day and, therefore, it held that such working did not confer on him any enforceable right for regular appointment. Consequently, the Original Application filed by the petitioner and registered as O.A. No.890 of 1999 came to be dismissed. 2 . The view taken by the Tribunal does not suffer from any errors apparent on the face of record and, therefore, this petition is rejected summarily. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)