IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Ist Bail Application No.595 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Neelu alias Shalindra Gupta S/o Rajesh Kumar Gupta R/o Munari Thana Bela, District Auriya (U.P.) ..….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …….Opposite party Dated: June 22, 2010 Arising out of Case Crime No.51 of 2010 Under Section 365 of IPC, P.S. Kotwali Nagar, Haridwar, District Haridwar Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. K.S. Verma, Advocate for the applicant as well as Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. Government Advocate for the State and also perused the record. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant is not named in the First Information Report. He further argued that the case rests upon the circumstantial evidence and the chain of the circumstances is not complete to connect the applicant with the said crime. Learned Addl. GA submitted that the only evidence against the applicant is the last seen evidence. After considering all the facts and circumstances; on hearing learned counsel for the parties; on perusal of the contents of FIR and other papers available on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant-Neelu alias Shalindra Gupta be released on bail on his executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar. The bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 22.06.2010 RG