IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38188 of 2011 Radhika Raman Yadav @ Dablu Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02/ 01.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named in a case registered under section 302/34 of the IPC and 27 of the Arms Act in which petitioner has been shown as the main assailant with allegation that he along with co-accused Rewati Raman Yadav and Jawahar Yadav opened indiscriminate fire on the deceased. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that informant of the present case has already died and so far as one so- called eye witness Sugga Yadav is concerned, he was examined as prosecution witness in Sessions Trial no. 636/2006 but he had not stated about involvement of the petitioner in the alleged crime but I am not at all convinced with the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner because admittedly, alleged occurrence took place in the year 2002 and the aforesaid witness Sugga Yadav was examined in the year 2009 in the trial of other accused and the petitioner could be remanded in this case in the year 2011. Accordingly, prayer for bail of petitioner in connection with Hasanpur P.S. Case no. 18/2002 pending in the court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rosera District Samastipur is, hereby, rejected. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)