CWP No.1352/2008. 21.08.2008 Present: Mr HKS Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.J.K.Verma, Dy.A.G. for respondents No.2 & 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to carry out the correction in the Court itself. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. It is admitted case of the petitioner that initially rightly on 3rd October, 2006 certificate of income was issued in favour of the petitioner. However, at a later stage i.e. on 1st November, 2006 the husband of the petitioner joined as PTA teacher, therefore, petitioner’s family income exceeded. Fairness should have been on the part of the petitioner informing the authorities that her family income has exceeded. Petitioner failed to do the same. At a belated stage, complaint was made and Deputy Commissioner, who after affording an opportunity to the petitioner, allowed her appeal. Aggrieved by the same, petitioner has approached the Divisional Commissioner who upheld the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner failed to indicate any other ground on the basis of which the two orders passed by the Deputy Commissioner and Divisional Commissioner can be interfered under the extraordinary writ jurisdiction. …2… We further find that the two authorities below rightly held that after the husband of the petitioner joined as PTA teacher, the petitioner is not eligible to continue. With these observations, the writ petition is dismissed, so also the pending application. ( Jagdish Bhalla ), C.J. August 21, 2008. ( Kuldip Singh ), J. (Hem/soni)