1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.135 OF 2004 Shri Shyamsundar Dagdulala Marda .. Petitioner Vs. Union of India & Others .. Respondents Ms.Kavita Pawar i/b Mr.Sanjay Kshirsagar for the petitioner Mr.S.S.Pakale for respondent nos.4 to 6 CORAM : J.N.PATEL CORAM : J.N.PATEL CORAM : J.N.PATEL & & & S.J.KATHAWALA, JJ. S.J.KATHAWALA, JJ. S.J.KATHAWALA, JJ. DATED : 6TH OCTOBER, 2008 DATED : 6TH OCTOBER, 2008 DATED : 6TH OCTOBER, 2008 P.C.: 1. In this petition, the petitioner is challenging the validity of Rule 7(2) of the Debt Recovery Tribunal Procedure Rules which provides court fees for the appeal to be filed u/s 30 of the Debt Recovery Tribunal Act. 2. We find that no case is made out to invoke our extraordinary Jurisdiction in the matter as 2 Rule 7(2) of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1993 is not in conflict either with the statute or with provisions in the Constitution of India. 3. Petition is, therefore, dismissed. ( J.N. PATEL, J ) ( J.N. PATEL, J ) ( J.N. PATEL, J ) ( S.J. KATHAWALA, J ) ( S.J. KATHAWALA, J ) ( S.J. KATHAWALA, J )