HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.fS) No. 2538 of2005 B: Hon'bte Mr. Justice Sstish K. Agnihotri, J Shri Alok Nigam, Advocate for th®petitioner. Smt Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govt. Advocate. &RDE_R (Passed on thjs 13th day of fvterch, 2007) !t is submittsd by ,'earnsd counse! for the pstitioner Siat the facte and questjon of la'*' invojved in the present petition are similar to ftat of in Ram Sahay Jha Vs. Stste of tSadhya Pradesh and others (Origina! Application No, 15 of 1995). The Msdhya Pradesh AdmJnJsfratjve Tribunat, Jabalpur, by its judgment and order dated 16.2.19^, allowed ths application of the petitioner therein. Lsamed counssl appearing for the petifioner seeks permission offhis Court to approsch ths respondente/State for consideration and dispcsal of the petitioner's case in terms of fte order dated 16.2.1998 -r——- Pstitioner Shiv Kumar Verma, Aged about 28 years, Son of Shri Shyamratan Verma, Residerrt of Vrffage Sonbhatta, Post- Kholi, Thana - Kharoa, Distt. Raipur (M.P.), ^x-Mansevi Sahayak Shikchhalc, Previously appointsd on due selection and eligibitities against the yacant post of Asstt, Teachers, under the End. Deptt. of Govt. of M.P.) Versus Respondems 1. Siate of M.P. (Now Chhatiisgarh) Through Secretery, School Education Department, Mantraiaya, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopat (M.P.) -2~ Commissioner of Public nstrucBons, Govt. of M.P. ducation Deptt., Directorate of Public instructions, (DPI Office), Near ChetakBridge, Bhopai (M.P.). ^7 Deputy Director of PubHc 'nstructions Govt. of M.P., Education Deptt. Education Distt. Raipur, P.0. Pension Bada, Arvind nagar, Raipur (M.P.). 4. B!ock Education Officer, Govt. of M-P., Education Deptt. P.0. Tilda, Tah. & Distt. Raipur(M.P.) ! 4. Thakur pa^ed in the case of Ram Sahay Jha (Supra) by the Madhya Pradesh Administrathfe Tribunaf, Jsbalpur. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents/Stats fairiy agrees with fte submission mads by leamed counsel appearing forthe petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation before She respondents - State Authorities for their decision on the representation in the !ight of fte order dated 16.2.1996 passed in $hs case of Ram Sahay Jha (Supra), in accordance with !aw, on ite own merit, within reasonable time. With the abovestated Hberfy, this petition stands disposed of. No ordsr as to Satish K. Agnihotri Judge