^f^ HI6H COUftT OF CHHATTCS6ARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition {5) No. 3546 of 2008 Petition&r Versus Regpondwits 1. z. Aryind ^umar Rairi, 5/o 5- Shriram, a^ed about 55 years, 5ub Divisionai Offieer, ^griculture, (Oiaifciyitrti, bistrict ftojnandgoon (C.Q.} The 5+at& of O-ihatfri^arh, through TTte 5ecretcry, Deparrment of Agricutture, DXS» Bhawori, Raipur (^) The Director, Agricullure, Chhaftis9Q»+»,Raipur (C.S.). WRH" PETTTION UN&ER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTrUTION CHS ZNDZA Singl®Bench: Mon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agrohotri. J. Skri Maiay Kumar Bhaduri. Advocate for liie petitioner. Shn Yashwant Singh Thakur, D&puty Advocate 6&nerol for th& rs^poncfents- ORAL ORDER (P<xssed on this 8th day of Jufy, 2008) 1. With the con^ent of jsarned counasl oppearing for the parti&s, the petition is heard fincsSjy. 2. Learned couns&t appearing for th& petition&r submit^ that tha petstion&r does not want to pr&ss this petittori on merits, at 'ri'iis stage. Hoi< yer, th& petition&r may te p&rmstted to »?iak& a r^presentatson before the conc&med outhoritie^ within a period of t^-»^r-^W,^ •••}'^"^'\ ^ •'ssa.w^^ thre& days and the jsame moy be dir^cted to be de.cided within the pr^scrsbBd time< 3. Leamsd couns&l cy|»arlingfor the rsspond&nts/State submits thot tf the reprasantation $5 moda, th& 3ai?ie shot! be decid&d by -th& conc&tn&d authori'+y within Q pe.riod of two week^ frow the cfate of receipt of th& rspr&sentatbn- 4. In view of th& fore9oing, nothing surysyfeS in the nustter. 5hri Ya^iwant Smgh Thakur, laanr&d b&puty Adyocat& 6er^roS fur-rti&r subnitts that no co&rcive steps srfiall be takws, tsd ths diq>osat of the representatbn. 5. Accordsngly, the petition stonds disposed of. No ord&r asto ccsts. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge Thakir