IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 431 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 03/03/2008 in WP NO : 4404 OF 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: K.G.R.L. Degree College, Dirusumarru Road, Bhimavaram, West Godavari District, Rep. by its Secretary and Correspondent, M. Padmanabham, S/o. Appana, aged 72 yrs, R/o. State Bank Colony, Bhimavaram, West Godavari District, ..... APPELLANT AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education (CE.II-I) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Director of Higher Collegiate Education, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 The Regional Joint Director Collegiate Education, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. 4 Sri Bhogireddi Satyanarayana Murthy, S/o. Late Mutyala Rao Dirusumarru Road, Bhimavaram, West Godavari District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant : MR.P.RAJAGOPAL RAO Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following : HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 431 of 2008 JUDGMENT : (Per Hon’ble Sri Anil R.Dave, CJ) Being aggrieved by the order dated 3rd March 2008, passed by the learned single Judge, dismissing writ petition No.4404 of 2008, this appeal has been filed by an educational institution. The aforesaid writ petition was filed by the petitioner/institution, against the order of 3rd respondent, rejecting its proposal for dismissal of respondent No.4/Lecturer from service. 2. Against the concurrent findings arrived at by the authorities below, which have been confirmed by the learned single Judge, this appeal has been filed by the management of the college. 3. We have gone through the order passed by the learned single Judge as well as the other orders passed by the authorities below, whereby the appellant was not accorded permission to dismiss respondent No.4/Lecturer. 4. Having noted the fact that the competent authority has duly considered all relevant factors and has come to a conclusion that there was no case against respondent No.4 for his dismissal, the proposal for dismissal of the concerned Lecturer was rejected. The said order has already been confirmed by the appellate authority as well as the learned single Judge. 5. We are of the view that there is no substance in the appeal, and, therefore, the appeal is dismissed. _________________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ 1st July 2008 ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J ajr To 1 The Principal Secretary, Higher Education (CE.II-I) Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Director of Higher Collegiate Education, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 The Regional Joint Director, Collegiate Education, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. 4 Sri Bhogireddi Satyanarayana Murthy, S/o. Late Mutyala Rao Dirusumarru Road, Bhimavaram, West Godavari District.