1 FARAD CONSTITUTION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO.716/2007 Raghuvirsingh s/o Bhagwansingh Chauhan ...Versus... Kishor Madhukarrao Upasni -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Shri Suresh Dhole, Adv. for applicant] [Shri Amit Kukday, Adv. for respondent] CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 25.07.2007. Heard Shri Dhole, learned Counsel for applicant and Shri Kukday, learned Counsel for respondent. This review application has been filed after the petitioner availed of the remedy of filing Letters Patent Appeal i.e. L.P.A. No.183/2007, which was withdrawn on 18.7.2007, thereby the order under review is already confirmed by the Appellate Court. It is, thereafter, the present review application has been filed. Shri Dhole, learned Counsel for the applicant has raised similar grounds which were raised when the hearing in the writ petition took place and was argued by Advocate 2 Mrs. Manisha Kathale. All those points were considered and a detailed order has been passed. In so far as order imposing costs is concerned, the order is self speaking order. There is no ground for review. The review application is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. Shri Dhole, learned Counsel for the applicant prays for four weeks time to pay costs of Rs.10,000/-, which was ordered by this Court under order dated 29.6.2007. Request made by Counsel for applicant is not opposed by Counsel for respondent. Hence, time of four weeks is granted to deposit the costs of Rs.10,000/- in the Trial Court. This extension is only for payment of costs. JUDGE ssw