Ilg""'!' ^^^^^••. IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUREAT BILASPUR fC.G.t WRITPETITIONfS^ N0.?99£ QF 2011 :-^ PETITIONER: y %^/ \^;<^--i'v) Q^)\A" .^?- •s^- <;•'• RESPONDENTS ~<% ^• ^ Madhusudan Mishra S/o. Late Shri Rajpati Mishra, aged about 50 years, occupatiori - Service, Posted as Upper Division Teacher ,at Govt. Middle School Bhupdev Kanya,. l<tewdabadi Raigarh, Distt.- Raigarh ( C.G.) VERSUS 1. THe Stateof Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary Department of School Education, D. K. S. Bhawan Raipur, Distt.- Raipyr ( C.G.) 2. ' The Director Lok Shikshan Sanchalnalaya,Raipur,Distt.- Raipur ( C.G.) 3. "^District Education Officer Raigarh, Distt.- Raigarh ( C.G.) ^ .'__ 4. Block Education Officer Raigarh, Distt.- Raigarh ( C.G.) WRFT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTFTUTIBN OFlINDIA. 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PgTrPONER % . -: -:. As stated in the causetiUe above. ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HQN'BLE SHRI PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA. J. W.P.(S)No.1996 of 2011 PETITIONER Madhusudan Mishra. Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh and others. WRfT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTfTUTION OF IND1A. Shri Awadh Tripathi, counset for petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Govt. Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER (15/04/20115 Following oral order of the Court was passed by Prashant Kumar Mishra. J. The petitioner was initially appointed as Assistant Teacher on a fixed pay of Rs.300/-. After comptetion of probation, he was granted regular pay scale. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the case is as to whether, the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or after completion on probation period. 3. The issue involved, herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh S&te Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 {Madhukanf YacSu and 56 oSiers Vs. State of M.P. & Ofhsrs), wherein it was held that the simiiariy situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scaie w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (CMI) No. 6892/93. The said petitton was d'smissed iy the Hon'ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunai to the 2.- K. effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from the date of initial appointment. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is also submits that this Court, while considering the same issue in Amar Sai Ram & ottiers Vs. State of Chhaitisgarh & others |W.P.(S) No. 4725/2006] by order dated 01/09/2006, allowed the petitioners to make a representation along with copy of the petition and annexures within a period of ten days, raising all their grievances and in tum the concemed respondent was directed to decide the representation in an objective manner within a'period of 30 days from the date of receipt ofthe representation. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation raising all his gnevances and in turn, the concerned respondent is directed to decide the representation, if any, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 6. In view of the foregoing, this petition is disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge