1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 656 OF 2007 ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NOS. 760, 64 & 65 OF 2007 Darius K. Soo awalla ...Petitioner versus Jawaharabad C.H.S. Ltd. .....Respondents through its Secretary. Petitioner – present in person. Mr. S.K. Jain for the respondents. CORAM; BILAL NAZKI & A.P. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED; 11TH APRIL, 2008. P.C.: 1. These petitions have been coming up of and on. These writ petitions have been filed, we are told, against the interlocatory orders passed by the Co-operative Appellate Court, where the appeals were pending. The main appeals have now been disposed of and appeals have been dismissed. Therefore, in our view, these petitions have become inmfructuous. Therefore, we are dismissing these writ petitions. It is stated by the petitioner that he has moved an application before the Hon. The Chief Justice to transfer these petitions to another Bench. Therefore we should adjourn these petitions on this ground. We do not think there is any justification to adjourn the cases which admittedly have become infructuous. If the petitioner has any greivance with regard to dismissal of appeals he 2 may avail appropriate remedies. (BILAL NAZKI J.) (A.P. DESHPANDE J.)