1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3193 OF 2010 Dilip Maruti Tidke ..Petitioner -VERSUS- Prakash Maruti Tidke and others. ..Respondents ....... Mr.N.R. Bhavar, advocate for petitioner. Mr.A.G. Talhar, advocate for respondent nos.1, 2 and 4. Mr.A.G. Jadhav, advocate for respondent ....... (CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) DATE : 14th July, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By consent, Petition is being disposed of in the following terms : (i) The impugned order is set aside. (ii) The trial Court may allow the respondents to file separate suit for partition and possession in terms of amendment, which was sought. The suit which is at fag end of trial, may be 2 proceeded and decided. (V.R.KINGAONKAR) JUDGE gas/wp3193.10