IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40429 of 2009 RAM CHANDRA PANDIT SON OF SRI YAMUNA PANDIT, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PANCHANAND COLONY, P.S. PRADHAN NAGAR, DISTRICT- WEST BENGAL PERMANENT RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SALEMPUR, P.S.- SURYAGARHA, DISTRICT- LAKHISARAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 25/11/2009 Heard Mr. Amit Kumar learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. It is submitted that the petitioner was admitted to bail by this court vide order dated 14.10.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 36654 of 2009. It is further submitted that in prayer portion of the application inadvertently Sessions Trial No. 698 of 2008 has been typed in place of G. R. No. 1837 of 2009 and the same has been incorporated in the order of this court. The petitioner was not released by the learned court below though the police station case number has rightly been mentioned. It is further submitted that in the order dated 14.10.2009 in third paragraph Pradhan Nagar P.S. Case No. 188 of 2009 has been typed in place of 181 of 2009. In view of the above facts, the order dated 14.10.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 36654 of 2009 is modified to the extent that the Sessions Trial No. 698 of 2008 should be read as G.R. Case No. 1837 of 2009 and in paragraph three of that order Pradhan Nagar P.S. Case No. 188 of 2009 should be read as Pradahan 2 Nagar P.S. Case No. 181 of 2009 and other terms and condition will remain same. It is surprising that the police station case number has rightly been mentioned in the order but the accused petitioner has not been released on bail which shows that the Presiding officer has not applied its mind and he has unnecessarily detained the petitioner without any excuse. The Presiding Officer is directed to release the petitioner forth with in terms of the previous order. In the result this modification application is allowed. Avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)