THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.NO.26319 OF 2009 ORDER This writ petition is filed seeking a Mandamus to declare the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing proceedings No.A1/223/2007, dated 10-6-2008 for releasing Rs.60,000/- for laying the road in the petitioner’s land in Sy.Nos.399/A and Sy.No.399/AA situated at Thimmapur village, Kandukur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without initiating any land acquisition proceedings and without paying any compensation, as arbitrary and illegal. According to the petitioner, he is the owner and possessor of agricultural land in an extent of Ac.1-12 guntas in Sy.No.399/A, and Ac.0-02 guntas in Sy.No.399/AA, totaling to Ac.1-14 guntas situated at Thimmapur village, Kandukur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. The said land is adjacent to the village and it is very valuable land. Keeping the same in view, the local leader (MPTC member) is trying to grab the said land. Aggrieved by the highhanded action of the MPTC member, the father of the petitioner filed O.S.No.121 of 2004 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Ibrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy District. In the said suit, interim injunction was granted in favour of the petitioner on 5-5- 2005 and the same was in force till 28-4-2008. On 28-4-2008, the Junior Civil Judge dismissed the suit on technical grounds. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed A.S.No.79 of 2008 before the Vacation District Judge, Ranga Reddy District. The learned Vacation Judge granted status quo on 19-5-2008. During the period from 28-4-2008 to 19-5-2008 the MPTC Member and his men created nuisance and also cut several trees of Acacia Arabica and sold away un-authorisedly and also poured some of the waste soil in the petitioner’s land. Therefore, the petitioner gave a complaint to the police. But, the police have not acted upon his complaint. Challenging the same, the petitioner filed WP No.28916 of 2008 and this Court while admitting the writ petition granted interim direction on 30-12-2008 to the Cyberabad Commissioner to consider the petitioner’s representation and take appropriate action as per law. Now, the respondents are laying road in the petitioner’s land and therefore, he made a representation to the first respondent on 6-11-2009 for taking appropriate action in the matter. Under those circumstances, without expressing any opinion on merits, the writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to dispose of the representation purported to have been made by the petitioner on 6-11-2009 and pass appropriate orders within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, as per law, after hearing the 4th respondent. _______________ C.V.RAMULU,J rkk Dated: 23-12-2010