IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9042 of 2009 VIJAY PRASAD SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 10.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that there was land dispute in between the informant and the petitioner’s relation. For that only he has been involved in the case otherwise the only reason behind the kidnapping was to prevent the informant and his witnesses from deposing against the petitioner’s relation. Taking the material collected by the .I.O. it submitted final form showing the petitioner innocent but cognizance was taken and the petitioner is apprehending his arrest. Prayer made on behalf of the petitioner is vehemently opposed by learned counsel appearing for the informant on the ground that co-accused persons of the case have been refused bail by this Court. There is some substance in the submission of the informant but it appears from the computer chart attached with this petition that several co-accused persons have been allowed bail vide Cr.Misc.nos. 26137, 46530 and 47338 of 2007. In that view of the matter, the prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in C.R. No.359 of 2002, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with - 2 - two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri C.M.Jha, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Samastipur, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI