IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.53451 of 2007 AWADHESH SINGH …PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. REJENDRA MAHTO For the petitioner :Mr.Rajiv Ranjan For the State :Mr. J. Upadhyaya,APP ----------- 07. 23.09.2010 Counsel for the petitioner while assailing the order impugned whereby cognizance punishable under diverse sections including sections 302 and 201 IPC based on the charge-sheet has been taken, submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. The two accused persons named in the FIR have not been sent up by the police. It is the contention of the petitioner that petitioner has been made scapegoat in the matter. In my view, on the strength of submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, the order impugned cannot be interfered with. The petitioner shall have adequate opportunity to raise/agitate the grievance(s) at the appropriate stage of the proceeding. The application lacks merit which is accordingly dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )