IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2299 of 1989 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE N.G.NANDI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- MB SOLANKI Versus D.S.P -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR IS SUPEHIA, for the Petitioner MR LR PUJARA, A.G.P., for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE N.G.NANDI Date of decision: 26/06/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT In this Special Civil Application the petitioner has been seeking to quash the adverse remarks as conveyed to him vide letter dated 3/9/1985. The impugned adverse remarks relate to the year 5/11/1984 to 31/3/1985. It is stated by Mr.Supehia, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner that in the departmental inquiry proceedings relating to the impugned adverse remarks, the petitioner has been exonerated of the charges levelled against him and the copy of the order passed in the disciplinary proceedings exonerating the petitioner is at Annexure 'F'. It is further stated that in view of the order at Annexure 'F' exonerating the petitioner in the departmental proceedings, these adverse remarks lose its effect and the petition having become infructuous deserves to be disposed of as infructuous. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Rule discharged. (N.G. Nandi, J) 'Bhavesh'