1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.271 OF 2009 Indrayani Co-operative Bank Ltd. ....Petitioner V/s. Bank Karmachari Sangh through its General Secretary ....Respondent Mr.Uday Warunjikar for the Petitioner. Mr.N.A. Kulkarni with Mr.Nilesh Malunikar for the Respondent. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 29TH JANUARY, 2010. P.C. :- 1. No interference is warranted in respect of the three orders. The order dated 18.4.2008 at Exhibit “F” of the Writ Petition, rightly holds that the documents of which the inspection was sought, are relevant for adjudication of the disputes which pertains to the dearness allowance. The documents pertain to the designation, salary, allowance and other benefits of the Petitioner employees. 2. The order dated 18.4.2008 rejecting the preliminary objection is also sustainable in view of the provisions of the Bombay Industrial Relation Act, 1946 and in view of the judgment of this Court in Bank Karmachari Sangh v. K.R. Pawar, Member, Industrial Court, Pune & Ors. 1996 I CLR 99. The third order also dated 18.4.2008 rightly observes that the application itself has become infructuous in view of the fact that the writ 2 statement has already been filed. It will however be open to the Respondent to seek inspection of the said documents by a separate application. With the above observations in respect of third order, the Writ Petition is dismissed.