wp8245.10 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8245 OF 2010 Popat s/o manikrao Gavahne .. PETITIONER VERSUS The State Election Commission & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. R.P. Bhumkar, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. V.H. Dighe, AGP for the State. Mr. S.T. Shelke, advocate for respondent no. 1. ===== CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & R.M. BORDE, JJ. DATE : 8 th DECEMBER, 2010 PER COURT : 1 Petition involves disputed question of fact. Apart from that, appropriate remedy to raise the issue which is sought to be raised before this court is by way of election petition which is provided under the Bombay Village Panchayat Act. 2 In that view of the matter, we are not inclined to entertain the petition. wp8245.10 2 Petition is therefore disposed of relegating the petitioner to the alternate remedy available to him under law. ( R. M. BORDE ) ( B. R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb