IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.936 of 2008 KAUSHAL KUMAR & ORS . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 04. 21.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. A supplementary show cause has been filed on behalf of the State. It is submitted on behalf of the State that the representation of the petitioner was considered and disposed of by order dated 13.03.2008 vide memo No. 1042, as contained in Annexure- E. The order has been complied with and as such, this contempt application need not proceed further. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order, as contained in Annexure – ‘E’, is not correct in law and as such, petitioner proposes to assail the same in an appropriate proceedings. In view of the above, since the order has been complied with, this contempt application need not proceed further and the same stands disposed of. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)