^' HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH ^T BILASPUR Wrlt Petitfon No. 5728 of 2005 Pctitioner Versus Respondents Chhatram Suryaban^ii. Son of latcs Sri Bhaskw SuryabcBi^ii, cged about 33 years, wori<ir9 as a Ld> Assistwt (Technical) Sub Divisional Officer, Shyam Qualjty Control, Sub Division : Libra, Anibikapur, resident of B<mki IrrJ9<ition Colony, Fundirdihtu'i, Ambikapur, District : Surqi^a (C.©.) Pennaient resident of village : (Conar, Post i Konar, Distrjct ; Janjgir - Champa (C.C.) 1. Union of Imlia through the Secretcny, Ministry of State ^ffdrs. New Oelhi. 2. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Water Resourc^s Department, &.K.S. Bhavon, Rdpur (C.6.) 3. State of Madhya Pradesh, through the Secretwy, Watw Resourc«sOepdrtment, Vdld? Bhwan, Bhopal (M.P.) 4. The6n9ineer-in^itef,Water Resources Department, Rdpur1 (C.6.) 5. The Sub &ivisional Offteer, Shyam Quatity Control, Sub Oivision; Ubra, Ambikapu''. bistrict; Surgiyo (C.&) 6. The Superintendjng &tgine<sr, Shyom Baniai Project, Cb'cle ; Ambikapur, District: Surgiya (c.e.) Singlfc Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Ay6hoM. Present: Mr. D.K. Vishw<d«rma,Advocate fw ttie petitioner. Mr*. <Ajoya l^i. Borik, Advocate for the respondent No. 1. Ms. Sunita J<rin, Panet Lcawyer for the respondents No, 2 and 4 to 6. s) ORDEft (Passed on 4rt bay of April, 2007) 1. Learned c<H^isel for the petitjoner ^ribmits ttwt Ihe petitioner md all of his family members resides in Stote of Oihattisgarii, thercfore the order of atlocation dated 17.10.200S (Amwsxwe P-1) passed by the Engirwer-in- Chief, Woter Resources Departnient, Raipw te t»d. 2. The petitioner was employed as Lcdb Assistant (Technical) in the Water Resourccs Deparhnent in the crstwhile State of Matftiya Pradedi. The Union of Indja, exercising its power wider provisions of Section 68 (2) of the Malhya Pradedi Reor9<inisatiwi Act, 2000, alkxwted the scrvices of the petjtioner to Stote of MacBiya Pradeah. The petittoner has been relieved vide opder datcd 29.10.2005 (^nnexure P-2). 3. Section 68 of the Madhya Pradesh Rcorganjsation Act, 2000 provides for altocation of services of St<rt-e of Madhya Prmte^i Qml ChhattJ^arh to be determined by the Central ^wernment, by 9enerol w special order, 4. The petjtioner chdlenges the order of oltoaxtjon on a simple 9roiBid thot his family members <re residing in State of CWiattJsgarii. The <A>jed-ion of the petitioTOr i$ not sustaimble <n law as the petitioner {nitially joirod in the erstuKhile Stote of Mac iya Pradesh. 5. After hwin9 cwisidered all the aspech? of the case, ttie petitioner hos b&en dtocated to the State of Madhya Pradesh* There is no other ground ^ tike violation of any guidelines w any ol+ier notification, drcular or ary other |MtovJsions of law. 6. Thus, this petitipn has no merit. Accor^lingly, it deserves to be and is dismissed. No order os to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Subhash