FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CR WP/344/2010 VINOD BAPURAO SONTAKKE V/S STATE 1. Heard respective counsel. 2. Rule. By consent, Rule made returnable forthwith. 3. State has filed the reply. 4. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, adverse report cannot be a sole ground for rejection of the prayer of the petitioner for grant of furlough. Shri Godbharale, learned Advocate points out reply affidavit sworn in by Bharat Bhosale, Additional Superintendent of Central Prison, Aurangabad. In this reply, it has been pointed out that earlier, request made by the petitioner was treated as Criminal Writ Petition No.1098 of 2009. Said petition was heard and rejected by this Court. Order subjected in this writ petition was also the subject of earlier writ petition. Copy is annexed with the reply. We have perused the same. 5. In this view of the matter, Writ Petition stands dismissed. No order as to costs. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that after the earlier order of this Court, petitioner has filed a representation on 6.3.2010. Copy of the same is on record. We direct the respondents to decide the said representation as expeditiously as possible. Registrar (J) of this Court is directed to FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS communicate this order to the petitioner, through jail authorities, immediately and by fastest mode of communication. 7. We quantify Rs.2,000/- (Rs.Two thousand only/-) towards fees and expenses to be paid to Shri S.P. Katneshwarkar, learned Advocate amicus curiae. It be paid to him accordingly. (S.S.SHINDE, J.) (S.B.DESHMUKH, J.) Dt.28.4.2010 akl