IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH APRIL 2010 / 17TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 12257 of 2010(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- P.J.DILSHAD, PULAVATH HOUSE, CHELAMATTOM, OKKAL P.O., PERUMBAVOOR. BY ADV. DR.GEORGE ABRAHAM RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. MAZHUVANNOOR GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MAZHUVANNOOR P.O., ERNAKULAM DIST. 2. THE CHIEF TOWN PLANNER, TOWN & COUNTRY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-33. 3. THE SENIOR TOWN PLANNER, REGIONAL TOWN PLANNING OFFICE, ERNAKULAM. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVT.PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 12257 OF 2010 (F) ===================== Dated this the 7th day of April, 2010 J U D G M E N T The prayer sought in the writ petition is to direct respondents 1 to 3 to grant building permit under the Kerala Municipality Building Rules to the petitioner's SSI unit. 2. Pleadings in the writ petition show that according to the petitioner, he having submitted his application in November, 2009, his application should be considered with reference to Rule as it stood then, and without reference to the amendment effected from 16/12/2009. In the light of the law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in State of Kerala v. Raveendran Pillai (2010(2) KLT 25), the prayer to direct consideration of the application with reference to the position obtaining as on the date of the application is untenable. 3. However, as according to the petitioner, orders on Ext.P1 application have not been passed, it is directed that the 3rd respondent shall consider Ext.P1 application in accordance with law and convey his decision to the 1st respondent, who shall pass final orders in the matter. The 3rd respondent shall convey his WPC No. 12257/10 :2 : decision within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment and on receipt thereof, 1st respondent shall pass final orders in the matter immediately thereafter. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp