IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8906 of 2009 VINOD KUMAR, SON OF SRI DEVENDRA PRASAD YADAV, R/V TULSIYA, P.S.BIHARIGANJ, DISTRICT MADHEPURA----PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA. 2. DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL PERSONNEL, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. SR. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATNA. 4. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MADHEPURA.-----RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02. 30.07.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner was an applicant for the post of Sub-Inspector of Police pursuant to Advertisement No. 704/2004. Having participated in the selection process both physical and written, he became successful and was recommended for appointment as Sub- Inspector of Police but his appointment is not being made as police verification about his character has not yet been made as would appear from the notice published in the newspaper on 10.2.2009, Annexure-3. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that police verification from the Superintendent of Police, Madhepura was received by the Inspector General of Police, Personnel, Bihar, Patna under Fax No. 1751 dated 18.9.2008 and Deputy Inspector General of Police, Personnel, Bihar, Patna under Fax No. 280 dated 11.2.2009, Annexures-5 and 5/A indicating that final form has been submitted against the petitioner as would appear from the order dated 7.11.2008 passed in Bihariganj P.S. Case No. 62 of 2007, Annexure-4. In this connection it is pointed out that petitioner has since been acquitted in the said case as would appear from the order dated 7.11.2008, Annexure-4. - 2 - 4. Let the authorities consider the verification report as contained in Fax Nos. 1751 dated 18.9.2008 and 280 dated 11.2.2009, Annexures-5 and 5/A in the light of the order passed in Bihariganj P.S. Case No. 62 of 2007, Annexure-4 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. 5. Let the petitioner represent before the D.I.G., Personnel annexing a copy of this order as also other documents in support of his character and request the D.I.G., Personnel to issue direction for accepting his joining in the light of the verification report as also the acquittal recorded in the aforesaid case. The D.I.G., Personnel shall be obliged to consider the request of the petitioner, as early as possible, in any case within one month of the receipt of the representation of the petitioner by passing a speaking order, if he is not otherwise inclined to accept the joining. 6. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)