# IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: December, 2006 LA.APP. 793/2006 # U.O.I Appellant ! Through : Mr. S.S. Gulia, Advocate. versus $ JITENDER KUMAR & ANR Respondent ^ Through : Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Advocate. AND + LA.APP. 794/2006 # UOI Appellant ! Through ; Mr. S.S. Gulia, Advocate. versus $ MADAN MOHAN &ANR Respondent \ ^ Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Advocate AND + LA.APP. 795/2006 # U.O.I Appellant ! Through : Mr. S.S. Gulia, Advocate. versus $ TARA CHAND &ANR Respondent Through : Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Advocate Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Signing Date:08.02.2024 16:36 Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified AND + LA.APP. 797/2006 * UOI Appellant ! Through ; Mr. S.S. Gulia, Advocate. versus $ RANDHIR SINGH & ORS. Respondent Through : Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Advocate. CORAM: * HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKUL MUDGAL * HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.P. SINGH 1. WhetherReporters of localpapers may be allowed to seethejudgment. 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment shouldbe reportedin the Digest? * Mukul Mudgal, J. These are the appeals filed by the appellants challenging the order, judgment and decree passed by the learned Additional District Judge in respect of the land acquired in village Bakkarwala. Section 4 notification was issued on 15.10.1993 for public purpose namely for "water treatment plant of Dwarka Project". The Land Acquisition Collector made the award bearing No. 12/95-96 @ Rs. 96,875/- per bigha. Upon reference under Section 18 of the Act the same was enhanced to Rs.1,08,000/- per bigha by the learned Additional District Judge. The assessment for the compensation has been challenged by both the 1 land owners and the Land Acquisition Collector. It is admittedthat this court in the case of LA.APP. No.189/2006 titled Jai Singh & Ors. Vs. UOI decided on 25.5.2006 fixed the market value of the land acquired by the same award at Rs.1,32,000/- per bigha. In view of the decision of Jai Singh (supra) the same are liable to be dismissed and as such dismissed leaving the parties to bear their own costs. J- MUKUL MUDGAL, J DECEMBER 07,2006 mb J.P. SIMJH, J