IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No 4577 of 2010 alongwith CWP Nos 4578, 4579, 4580 and 4582 of 2010. Decided on 12.8.2010 1. CWP No. 4577 of 2010. Dev Parkash ….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents 2. CWP No. 4578 of 2010. Suresh Lal ….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents 3. CWP No. 4579 of 2010. Bhisham Dutt ….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents 4. CWP No. 4580 of 2010. Vikas Indiver ….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents 5. CWP 4582 of 2010 Kamlesh Sharma ….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. R.S Gautam, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) In all these cases, the petitioners raised two contentions. (1) They are entitled for vacation salary and (2) They are also entitled for counting the service rendered by them on contract basis for the purpose of increments, pension etc. As far as the latter prayer is concerned, it is submitted that the petitioners may be permitted to file appropriate representations before the second respondent. As far as the first issue is concerned, this Court has already held in several judgments that it will be open to the petitioners to execute bonds in the event of the matter now pending before the Supreme Court is dismissed, the petitioners will refund the amount granted to them with 10% interest. Therefore, these writ petitions are disposed of as follows: 2. In the event of the petitioners executing bonds to the effect that they will refund the amount with 10% interest in the event of the matter now pending before the Supreme Court against the judgment of this Court in the case of vacation salary is dismissed, they would refund the amount of vacation salary with 10% interest, the vacation salary be disbursed to them within a period of three months from the date of execution of the bonds by the petitioners. 3. As far as the grievance regarding the counting of service rendered during the contract period followed by regular service for the purpose of increments and pension is concerned, the petitioners may file appropriate individual representations before the first respondent, in which case the matter will be duly considered by the first respondent within another four months. 4. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. August 12, 2010 (HL) (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge