^5ET;;!IRITcCT, UTi1'H<l<»;Rrtl<<1 *11*1CTl ^TT^* 3II^?T<RTR-litb aanaii^9TsOTra> ••6. 311^91 'WP (yi^EKi) W^ 200 ?;Rn8R;HfeT3II^9T (Sinale Bench: Hdn'ble Mr. Justice Ohirendra Mishra) W.P pErmoNBt (PetitionU/A t>r. d Late [26 of Constitution of India) '•em Sin9h Morko, Aged-38 years, Sori of ]Shri t>annu Singh Morko, Medical Officer, Comnjunity Health Center, Lokhanpur, Distt.- llja, Pr'esentiy werking as - Offieiating Biaek |al Officer, at - Lakhanpur, Distriet-Sarguja Surg^ Medi< (C.6.) Vs RESPON&B^TTS 1. S^ s< F< R< 2. n n. 3. T( 4. A 5. D Present: Mr. R.K. Kesharwani,Adv.forthe Mr. Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Adv. Seneral 21.11.2008 Heard. By this Detition the peti Medical Officer. has prwed for quariiing of the impugned ord< chiyfd'iil'1 *1|t|dT»l'ls'<l'((ultcit ^s sri^T 3n^»i [sl ISto.5678/08 ate of Chhattisatt'h. Throuah! thc icretary, Depart'ment of Public Health <md mily Welfflre, Mantralaya, D.K.S. BhaMfcn, ipur (CS). ic Director, Health Services, OihaM'isgarh ^> rlk^.?u,,u //* ^* ^ ia(. - KOiptiT V^.O.). ic Collector. District - Sorgi(Je (C.©.) Chief w'ledica! oi Health Officer, ibikapur, District Sargyja (C.G.) Prem Sukh Kerketta, Medieat Officer*, Cc|fflmunity Health Center, Lakhanpur, i^trict- Sargiya (C.6.) tsetitioner-. Ifor the State. •(•ioner. who is presantly efficiating as Block ]a dtrection to the resDondent outhorities for st- dated 19.9.2008 (Annexure P-4) whereby tf ,f" ^tff ^•:m:!SSSS 6a:ssss)S-lfi-78 3il ^BEf ^TRncRT, ti>Tnwi<<.7H«W3'< +tl«1«l^lTT^ 3)T^STWRrl ?rai3n^n!b*ii* Kl A air^STiRcp ('i^fp^s) W^ 200 STaTaR^ifeTan^CT Z-- respondent No.5 has been appo the petitioner, who is holdin9 ^ <ni<4fo<Ili *iiinV^fs'<l ^FJK-CI'! ^ari^TSii^?! inted as Block Medlcol Officer in his place and ubstantive post of Senior Medieol Officer and senior to reSDondent No.5 as pejr seniority li?t of Armexure P-7, has beenmade to work under respondent No.5. Learned counset for ttielDetitioner submits •that he is not Dressina this petition at this stcge on meri^s, however, he may be altowed to make fresh rcoresentation before resoondeht No.l. who in turn mw be further dh^cted to consider & decide hls represent^ion within the specified period. Mr. Thakur, learned Dep^irty Advocate Seneral oppearhg for the Stote submits that in ccse the petitiofier flles representation before rapondent No.l within seven doys from todcy, respondent No.l within a perio^l of two weeka from the dofte of receipt of representation. In view of above submi^sions of teomed counsel for the parties, this petition is disposed of with lib^rty to the petitioner to moke a I'epresentotion alona with certified coov of thy directed to considerand decide I.A.No.l&Zalsostandd Certified copy as per rulejs. the same sholl be considered and deeided by order before the respondent No.l within seven days from todw. On such r^oresentation belnq mode. respondent NoA is the same on its own faets in accordonce with law within a period of two weeks fro(n the date of receipt of the t-epresentation. -Sd/- SDOsed of. DhirendraMishra Judge 24^1^0 § ,, _ , ^^^""y'-^ 'Cbpy cottrts ordw dL..-:i»!.'..3.1.;&.^ it communicated te the , '? RBSpendent8....°.l...to..........—.fur