(’4’; M737 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ‘.P.(S) N0. €Hb§ of 2010. Omprakash Shanna, aged about 52 years, Son of Late Shri Bhagwanlal Sharma post- Radiographer, Resident of PETITIONER: Village- Chatterji line Godripara Chirirniri District —Korea. (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1. State of C.G.Through: The secretary, Department of finance and Planning , Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Chief Medical and Health officer, Baikunthpur, District — Korea (C.G.). 3. Chief Medical and Health officer, District Durg (C.G.) y, 4. The Joint Director, Kosh Avam Lekha, Raipur, (C.G.) 5i The Joint Director, Kosh Avam iekha, Bilaspur, (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF VTHE WRIT 1N THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARI, PROHIBITION AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS ORDER OR ORDERS DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. 78 <ww¢ K%Hmm wanmmmiamm§&wmgz WW N639» (\Q» mgi/zoo mmfwv WWW mmm WW‘§@W $aimm 3B : HGI‘E’ELE MR. é§$TE€E .TPRJ 17.993919 ” Shri R‘Kaj aiSwa} ShriV.V.S.M00 ,. rA 7494 LC. m Wnrknc a< Ra Ho granteri the benefit of Time $Caie se. 103‘ ‘36 z) ttmnf. be servac‘ if at this stage, thé mast netiticm whb er 1W Lhat orlor L o He SL b ‘ e x PW “mt the same: haw the rasaondent§ be directad to c the Dem 01m” as ex a ficu$ly as Cou mlSuV mt 2C( 6L :y tL “A: pet tlOueX' ‘S According! J, ‘Cet‘; T ‘V"’H ALOFI‘L] ctS 8A) Q a authority to decide the: saici “a Swm, n acramqncp My” law. ‘1“ N u on merms of tne CPsb an the ah t0 CA‘C‘LG6 ‘ h €“J1 F‘SFH ahld 1 “' v1+a 1t £s madt‘ (‘1 “ *hat £101“‘“‘ ‘S p617 Easx wwese ) ama, rem‘aSentamom z dc» n wide tha pending rapt Ooss. 1P “e penamg “enmsemae on eh Lance with iaw. ' il‘ \‘d. 8S X 10h has “CL VxureSSr,‘ any o ioritv cance nec would ba a ort‘fance with 7//’ ES 21$ teat Sinse lms mat vuL L Lu K; c" a he €I GB C 6&3“. CO}'1S’$€£‘€C§ EJ‘Q TL {ion if w wermitted to wi [1T A 6X {)(‘tf‘ z‘spresanta ticn as t‘ m. mmmef I f EX F 1110K Sdl— r Diwake" Judge Pritinke 3r the netiticner‘ 3. {at t‘rva $tate, in tha wresent aatiiion is 1‘0B5 ’5‘ VF “‘R ‘""’WAKER ./v tun “f g b }: ?” p : 78 WW W3? . NPw...f/ 0 200 £i§ mm (Wu) mant$1i$ WWW WWW WM wm %aifa=rm $3 : HON’BLE MR. JU$TECE PR] 17.09.2010 Shri R.K.Jaiswa1, counsei f Shri V.V‘S,M00rthy, Dy. A, Grievance of ihe petitioner 7.4.94. he is working as Radiogr granted the benefit ofTime ScaEe_ Counsel for the petitianer be served if at this stage, the pet petition with liberty to putsue tht He submits that‘pn'or to 5.3.201( the netit‘loner but the same haw the resoondents be directed to c the petitioner as expeditiously as State counsel has no objet the petitioner is ciecided in accon Accordingly, the petition petitioner with liberty as aforesa authority to decide the said possible, in accordance with law, it is made clear that this K on merits of the case and the au to decide the representation in at TEKKER EEWAKER 3r the petitioner. 3. for the State. in the present petition is that since anher but .iii date he has not been Pay. submits that ends of justice woe-fie} :tioner is permitted to Withdraw this : last representation ciated 5,3.o010. i aiso, representations were made by 1 not been considered and therefore tecide the pending representation of ‘Dos sibie. ition if the pending representation of iance with iaw. er is nermitted to Withdraw this di it is expected from the competent representation as exneditiousiy a Iourt has not expressed any opinion :hority concerned wouid be at Eiherty ipordance with iaw. _/ aéka Sdl— Pritinke Judge r Diwak“. \. My s