-1- IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.667 OF 2004 NO.667 OF 2004 NO.667 OF 2004 Shri Mustafa N. Siddique ... Petitioner v/s Shri Azimulla H. R. Baksh and anr.... Respondents Ms Anita Bhaktawani for Petitioner. Mr P.S. Dani for Respondent No.1. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH J. DATE : 22ND JUNE 2005. -2- P.C. :- 1. The Court, on finding that the explanation that was given for the delay was false, has refused to condone the delay. the explanation given for condonation of delay is to be liberally construed, but if the explanation given is found to be false, it has to be rejected at the outset. I find no fault with the order impugned. Interim order stands vacated. Petition is rejected. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Sheristedar / Personal Secretary of this Court as true copy. . Certified copy expedited. --------------------