$ing¥¢$ mmh @ W“); 1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILAspUR 0 «LGJ W.P. s No. é ' 2011 r WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE ‘ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioners,- as named above, most respectfully beg - to submit asunder: 1 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS:- t PETITIONERS: / 1. Smt. Usha Kiran Khalkho w/o Shri Vinay Khalkho, aged about 38 years, Presently working O/ 0 Directorate Public Instruction, Pension Bada, Raipur (C.G.) , 2‘ Smt. Lata Bake w/ o Shri Surjan Tigga, aged about 39 years, Presently working O/ o District Education Officer, Surajpur Distict Sarguja (C.G.) / 3. Benedik Kispott S/o Late Shri Martin ’Kispotta, aged about 38 years, Presently working O/ o District Education Ofiicer, Janjgir District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: x1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department of School Education, D.K.S Bhawan, Mantralay Raipur (C.G) / 2. Under Secretary Department of School Education D.K.S Bhawan Mantralay Raipur (0G) /3. Director, Public Instruction, Raipur (C.G) HIGH COURT OF CHI-IAT‘TISGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKER w.P.gS).No. 5431;201 1 Ms. Ritu Mishra, counsal for the petiticmers. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, G.A. for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONETITUTION OF INDIA ORDER (02.11.2011) Grievance of the petitioners in the present petition is that they are entitled for their pmmon‘on to the post of Assistant Directors (P1a11ning) from that. of Assistant Statistical Officers. Counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that she is only praying for the disposal of their pending representation by the competent authority. State counsel points out that the petitioners have made representation recently i,e. on 5.10.11 and without waiting for sujiicient period they have rushed to this Court and therefore the petition is liable to be dismissed. Be that as it may, as the petitioners have already made a representation it is expected from the competent authority to consider and decide the same as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. With the above observation, the petition stands disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authority concerned would be at liberty to dec1de the same strictly in accordance With law Sd/— Pritinker Eiwakar Judge PETITIONERS Smt. Usha Kiran Khalkho 8t, Others versus RESPONDENTS Stats of C.G. 8r. Others