1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No.5056/2007 Ashta Vinayak Infrastructure Private Limited and another Vs. The Collector of Stamps, Nagpur City and another. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM : A.P. LAVANDE, J. DATED : 09/09/2008. Heard Mr. Dharmadhikari, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Sambre, learned G.P. for respondent no.1. None for respondent no.2. By this petition, the petitioners challenge order dated 30.8.2007 passed by respondent no.1 dismissing the application on the ground that he had already passed order dated 23.7.2007. Mr. Sambre, learned G. P. appearing for respondent no.1 invited my attention to Section 53A (1) of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 and submitted that efficacious alternate remedy by way of an appeal before the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority against the impugned order is available for the petitioners. Mr. Dharmadhikari, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners may not be relegated to remedy of appeal and the petition be entertained having 2 regard to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case. Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, I am of the considered opinion that this is not a fit case to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India since the petitioners have efficacious remedy by way of an appeal under Section 53A (1) of Bombay Stamp Act to challenge the impugned order. The petition is, therefore, rejected. JUDGE Ambulkar.