IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA FIRST APPEAL NO. 213 OF 2005 SMT. KRISHNABAI SHIVGONDA LOKURE AND 2 ORS ... Appellants Versus SHRI SHANKARAO KRISHNAPPA LOKURE ... Respondent Mr. S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Mr. H. Kankonkar, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Sudesh Usgaonkar, Advocate for the respondent. Coram:- D. G. KARNIK & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 20th October, 2010 P.C.:- (1) Learned Counsel for the appellants and the Counsel for the respondent tender consent terms. (2) The consent terms bear the thumb impression of appellant No.1. Appellant No.1 is not present before us. However, the Counsel for the appellants explains that the appellant No.1 has come to the Court building and is sitting on the ground floor since she cannot climb up the stair. He states that she has put her thumb impression before a Section Officer of the High Court on the ground floor. The consent terms are signed by the appellants No.2 and 3. Appellants No.2 and 3 are personally present in the Court and are identified by their Advocate. Appellants No.2 and 3 on being asked in Konkani by one of us state that they have signed the consent terms after having understood them and that the consent terms have been explained to them in Konkani language which they understand. The consent terms are also signed by the respondent who is personally present in the Court and who is identified by his Advocate. He admits his signature and also the contents thereof and says that he knows and understands English. The consent terms are also signed by the Advocates for the appellants and the respondent. (3) The consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. There shall be an order and decree in terms of the consent terms. The appeal is disposed of. D. G. KARNIK, J. F. M. REIS, J. ssm.