1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Criminal Application (APPA) No.175/2011 in Criminal Appeal No.-------/2011 ( State of Maharashtra, through Dy. S.P., ACB, Wardha ..Vs.. Awadhut s/o Narayanrao Shewte & another ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. V.P. Thakre, APP for applicant/State. CORAM : M.N. GILANI J. DATE : 16.6.2 011 . Heard learned A.P.P. for the applicant/State. Perused the judgment impugned in this appeal. In para 21 of the judgment learned Special Judge observed that two possibilities emerge from the evidence brought on record. One was that the amount of Rs.150/-, accepted by the accused no.1, was a bribe amount to show favour to the complainant. Second was that the complainant had sold the flag tickets and then deposited the sale proceeds with the accused no.1. The accused no.1 was conducting the Chapter Proceedings against the complainant. During the course of proceedings, because of absence of the complainant, warrant 2 was issued against him. The accused no.2 was sent by the accused no.1 to the house of complainant and demanded bribe of Rs.150/-. This resulted in complainant approaching Anti Corruption Department and thereafter the trap was laid. That being so, there exists good ground to appeal against order of acquittal. Hence leave, as prayed for, is granted. Admit. Action under section 390 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Bailable warrant against respondents. Returnable after eight weeks. JUDGE Tambaskar.