IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA THURSDAY, THE 21ST FEBRUARY 2008 / 2ND PHALGUNA 1929 WA.No. 412 of 2008 --------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.12976/2004 DATED 19/06/2007. .................... APPELLANT/ PETITIONER: -------------------------------------- SALIM V., NIGHT WATCHER-CUM-SWEEPER DISTRICT STATIONARY OFFICE, PATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADV. SRI.P.SANKARANKUTTY NAIR, SRI.T.V.AJAYAKUMAR. RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ----------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF STATIONARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. CONTROLLER OF STATIONARIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DISTRICT STATIONARY OFFICER, PATHANAAMTHITTA. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.S. SANTHOSH KUMAR. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/02/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J.B.KOSHY & K.HEMA, JJ. ------------------------------- W.A.NO.412 OF 2008 () ----------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of February, 2008 J U D G M E N T KOSHY,J. A writ appeal (W.A.No.88/2008) filed from one of the connected judgments was disposed of by judgment dated 25.1.2008. The above writ appeal was disposed of with the following observations: “The petitioner's rights were confirmed in Vasanti v. State of Kerala (2006 (1) KLT 288) as can be seen in paragraph 12 of the judgment. It is also stated that in a number of cases, court directed to regularise the persons like petitioner as they were appointed after a selection process as per the rules. Government Pleader submitted that Government has not filed appeal against regularisation order (Ext.P3 judgment) and even though in some of the cases, Special Leave Petition was filed and those appeals were withdrawn and regularisation order was issued. Petitioner also is entitled to protection and the direction regarding the consideration of claim for promotion of part time contingent employee, if any, will not WA.412/2008 2 affect the petitioner. Therefore, no further orders are necessary.” Hence, this writ appeal is also disposed of with the same observations. J.B.KOSHY, JUDGE K.HEMA, JUDGE prp J.B.KOSHY & K.HEMA, JJ. -------------------------------------------------------- M.F.A.NO. OF 2006 () --------------------------------------------------------- J U D G M E N T --------------------------------------------------------- 21st February, 2008