HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.30338 of 2010 Date:10.12.2010 Between : Nomula Reddaiah and others .. Petitioners And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioners seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with peaceful possession and enjoyment of their agricultural lands over an extent of Acs.17.05 cents in Survey Nos.642/2, 642/3, 654/1 and 654/2 in T. Narasapuram Revenue Village, T. Narasapuram Mandal of West Godavari District, as illegal and arbitrary. The case of the petitioners is that they are the absolute owners of the subject land and 5th respondent is the brother of the 1st petitioner and 6th respondent is son of 5th respondent. Respondent Nos.5 and 6 filed O.S.No.6 of 2010 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Chintalapudi, against petitioner Nos.1 and 2 for permanent injunction, with an allegation that the father of the 1st petitioner executed a will in favour of his sister, who in turn, executed a gift settlement deed in their favour. Initially, injunction orders were granted by the Court below but, subsequently, after filing counter, they were modified and both parties were directed to maintain status quo. It is further stated that at the instance of respondent Nos.5 and 6, the official respondents i.e., respondent Nos.3 and 4, are interfering with the possession of the petitioners, while the dispute is pending before the civil Court. This matter came up for admission on 06.12.2010. It was adjourned to enable the Government Pleader for Home to get instructions. When the matter is taken up today, the learned Government Pleader has placed before this Court, the written instructions dated 09.12.2010, in which, it is clearly stated that, as of now, no complaint has been received against the petitioners by respondent Nos.5 and 6 and also the officials respondents, i.e., respondent Nos.3 and 4, are not at all interfering with the land of the petitioners. In the facts and circumstances of the case, as no complaint is received against the petitioners and the official respondents, i.e., respondent Nos.3 and 4, never interfered with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over the subject land and the dispute between the petitioners and respondent Nos.5 and 6 is civil in nature, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition placing on the statement of respondent Nos.3 and 4 on record. However, it is made clear that any further complaint of similar nature against respondent Nos.3 and 4 will be viewed seriously. With the above observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 10th December 2010 KH