IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9174 of 2003 DR.AKHILESH KUMAR DUBEY, Son of Sidhnath Dubey, Bharatiya Paramedical College & Hospital, 24-B S.K. Puri, Boring Road, Patna, Bihar. ............... Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Secretary, Health Education and Family Welfare Department, Patna. 3. The Examination Controller, Health Education & Family Welfare Department, Patna. 4. The Civil Surgeon, Patna. 5. The District Magistrate, Patna. 6. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna. ............. Respondents ----------- 10. 8.1.2010 Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar Chaudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. The prayer of the petitioner in this writ application reads as follows: “Through this application the petitioner prays for issuance of an appropriate writ for quashing the following order/ orders/ communication: I. The letter no. 61/E.C. dated 12.7.2003 issued by the Examination Controller Health Services, Bihar, Patna, respondent no.3 as contained in Annexure 1 whereby and whereunder the respondent no.3 has written letter to the Senior S.P., Patna to lodge F.I.R. against B.P. Medical College and Hospital and close the institution. II. The respondent no.6 be prevented to lodge F.I.R. against 2 the B.P.Medical College and Hospital and close the institution.” Before this Court would advert to decide the aforementioned issue as with regard to exercise of power under Article 226 of the Constitution for restraining any person from lodging F.I.R., it would be necessary to first take into account the contents of the impugned order, which reads as follows: ^^la[;k&61@i0fo0 fcgkj ljdkj LokLF; AfpfdRlk f'k{kk ifjokj dY;k.k ,oa ns'kh fpfdRlkA foHkkx izs"kd] Mk0 AdSIVuA ,u0ih0;kno] ijh{kk fu;a=d] LokLF; lsok;sa fcgkj] iVukA lsok esa] ojh; vkj{kh v/kh{kd] iVukA fo"k;%& futh {ks= esa voS/k :i ls lapkfyr QthZ oh0ih0 esfMdy dkWyst ,oa vLirky 24 ch0 ,l0 ds0 iqjh iVuk 800001 ds fo:n~/k izkFkfedh ntZ dj vko';d dkjZokbZ djus ds laca/k esA egk'k;] mi;qZDr fo"k;d lanHkZ esa funZs'kkuqlkj dguk gS fd 24 ch0 ,l0ds0iqjh iVuk 800001 esa ,d QthZ fpfdRlk laLFkku] ftldk uke ch0ih0esfMdy dkWyst ,oa vLirky gS] dh rjQ ls izsl lwpuk tkjh dj Nk=&Nk=kvksa ls ,yksiSFkh] vk;qZosfnd gksfe;ksiSfFkd] HksVujh] ,xzhdYpj ,oa ;ksxk vkfn ls lacaf/kr ikjk esfMdy dkslZ esa ukekadu gsrq vkosnu i= vkeaf=r fd;k x;k gSA jk"Vzh; Lrj ij LFkkfir lacaf/kr dkSafly ,oa fcgkj fpfdRlk f'k{kk laLFkk Afofu;eu ,oa fu;a=uA vf/kfu;e 1981 ds vuqlkj jkT; ljdkj dh fcuk vuqefr izkIr fd;s bl rjg ds laLFkkuksa dks lapkfyr djuk iw.kZr% voS/k gS rFkk ;g d`R; laKs; vijk/k dh Js.kh es vkrk gSA mYys[kuh; gS fd bl laLFkku dks jkT; ljdkj }kjk vuqefr@ekU;rk iznku ugha dh xbZ gS rFkk Hkkjr ljdkj ;k lacaf/kr fo'ofo|ky; ls lEc}rk@ekU;rk izkIr djus dh Hkh lwpuk jkT; ljdkj dks ugha gSA Li"V gS fd laLFkku Nk=@Nk=kvksa@vfHkHkkodksa dks xqejkg dj O;fDrxr ykHk ds fy, /kks[kk/kM+h dj jgk gS vkSj bl izkdj ls uktk;t jkf'k izkIr dj jgk gSA Li"V gh bldk dk;Z n.M lafgrk ,oa vijk/k lafgrk ds foijhr gSA 3 vr% vuqjks/k gS fd d`i;k bl QthZ laLFkku ds fo:n~/k izkFkfedh ntZ djus dk d"V djsa rFkk fof/k lEer rjhds ls laLFkku can djus dh Hkh dkjZokbZ djsa rkfd fujhg turk dk 'kks"k.k u gks ldsA fo'oklHkktu] g0@& vLi"V 12-7-03 AMk0 DSIVuA ,u-ih-;kno ijh{kk fu;a=.k LokLF; lsok;sa] fcgkj iVukA vuq0&1- nSfud lekpkj i=ksa esa izdkf'kr foKkiu dh izsl dVk layXu** Mr. Chaudhary, however, after making some argument could ultimately concede that the provisions of Bihar Chikitsha Siksha Sanstha (Viniyaman & Niyantaran) Adhiniyam, 1981 could be made applicable in respect of the institution in question, B.P.Medical College and Hospital, and therefore, the authorities of Health Department had the jurisdiction to lodge the F.I.R. if any violation thereof was found by them. That being the limited scope of this writ application when Mr. Chaudhary has also ultimately made a prayer to withdraw this application, this writ application must be dismissed as withdrawn but by also making it clear that the interim order of this Court dated 15.9.2003 by which the respondents were restrained in not giving effect to the direction for lodging of the 4 F.I.R. is hereby recalled/ vacated. The Sr.S.P., Patna (Respondent no. 6) is accordingly directed to lodge an F.I.R. and also take appropriate action against the petitioner as is permissible in law. Let a copy of this order be sent to Respondent no. 3 and Respondent no. 6 for its immediate compliance. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/