THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3651 of 2011 ORDER This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 07.03.2011 passed by VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC), Vijayawada in I.A.No.267 of 2010 in A.S.No.49 of 2008, whereby the application filed under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (for short ‘the Act’) to refer Ex.A.1 pronote dated 10.08.2004 to the Government Handwriting Expert for comparison and for report, has been dismissed. Having regard to the pleas taken by the petitioners in the written statement that the father of the respondent/plaintiff lent money to them and obtained blank pronote and that even though they have paid the entire amount to the father of the plaintiff, he did not return the said pronote, filing of the present Interlocutory Application by taking a plea that the said pronote is forged and it should be sent to the Expert for comparison under Section 45 of the Act, is nothing but protracting the litigation. In view of the same, the discretion exercised by the Court below in dismissing the Interlocutory Application does not suffer from any illegality warranting interference by this Court. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ A. GOPAL REDDY, J Date: 14.10.2011 va