CR No. 8160 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 8160 of 2010 Date of decision:- 15.12.2010 Rajan Kumar Luthra ......petitioner vs. Sarika ......respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: - Mr. Anil Chawla, Advocate for the petitioner HEMANT GUPTA, J (ORAL) The parties entered into a settlement including the grant of visitation rights to the petitioner. On the basis of the said settlement and in terms of the directions of this Court, the marriage between the parties stand dissolved by mutual consent. The petitioner filed an application before the Matrimonial Court for direction to the respondent to produce the minor child Nakishta in terms of the compromise for visitation rights. The said application has been dismissed by the Matrimonial Court vide the order dated 13.2.2011, impugned in the present revision petition. After the marriage between the parties to dissolve by mutual consent, the Matrimonial Court becomes the functus officio. For failure to comply with the terms of compromise particularly in respect of visitation rights, the petitioner is at liberty to take recourse by filing a petition under the Guardian and Wards Act 1890 before the Guardian Judge or under the Hindu Minor and Guardianship Act 1956. CR No. 8160 of 2010 -2- In view thereof, I do not find any illegality and irregularity in the order passed by learned Matrimonial Court. Dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 15.12.2010 preeti