IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21424 of 2010 MANJU DEVI, WIFE OF SUDAMA SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 30.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the Informant and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 365 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the 24 years old son of the Informant was abducted by the petitioner and her son six months back. Considering the inordinate delay and there being no cogent material in support of the same, let the petitioner above named, who is a lady and is in custody since 29.4.2010, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua in Kudra P.S. Case No. 01 of 2010 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if she is, she shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the 2 petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after her release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that she will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if she fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, her bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)