HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR. CHHATTISGARH SINGLE BENCH: HON'BLE SHRI S.R. NAYAK, CJ. WRIT PETJTIQN NQ. 1598 OF 2006 PETITIONER Ram Bai Patel W/o Shri Bhai^i Lal Patel, Aged about 50 years, Caste -Kurmi, R/o Village- Chainpur, P.O./P.S./Tahsil - Manendragarh, Dist: Korea (C.G.) Vs. RESPONDENTS 1. Pwctsadith Tiwari S/o RamkWlawan Twari, ftged about 58 years. R/o Ward No. 1, Opp : Hindusten Petroleum Pump, Behind Tiwari Hatel, Manendragar, Tehsil—Manendragarh, Dist. Korea (C.G.) 2. The Board of Revenue Bilaspur, Dist Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. The Collector, Korea, Distt. Korea (C.G.) 4. The Sub Dh/isional Officer, (Revenue) Manendragarh, Dlstt. Korea ^C.G.) 5. The Tahsildar, Manendragaiti, D!istt. Korea (C.G.) Present: Mr. Bharat Rajput, teamed counsel for the petitiorwr. Mr. Yashwant Singh, teamed G.A., for the State of C.G. ORALORDER (Passedon5u> April.2006) The dispute brought before the Court relates to the question whether the petitioner has encroached the Bhoomiswami land granted to the first respondent. All the authorities under the Land Revenue Code up to the level of Board ofRevenue have recorded concurrent factuat finding that the petitioner encroached the Bhoomiswami land of the first respondent. (2) Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, it could not be said that the factual finding recorded by all theauthorities under the -3- Land Revenue Code is perverse for want of legal evidence. It is needtess to state that this Court cannot go into the quesUon sufflctency of evidence on the basis of which the statutory authorities have recorcted factuat findings. The writ petiBon is devoid of merit and it is accordingly dismissed. Nocosts. Sd/- ChiefJustice &<»}.-^