IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 11TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 20TH KARTHIKA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 7118 of 2010() ---------------------------------- (CRIME NO.81/2006 OF THE POOYAPPALLY POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT) ........... PETITIONER/ACCUSED --------------------------- SHIHABUDEEN, AGED 40 YEARS, SAJINA MANZIL, OTTUMALA, KATTADI P.O., OYOOR, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT -------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POOYAPPALLY POLICE STATION THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZE THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: svs/ V.RAMKUMAR, J. ---------------------------------------------- Bail Application No.7118 of 2010 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 11th day of November, 2010 ORDER The petitioner, who is the accused in Crime No.81 of 2006 of Pooyappally Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 323 & 506(i) I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail. 2. Consequent on the non-appearance of the petitioner in C.C.No.880 of 2006 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Kottarakkara the case against the petitioner has been transferred to the Long Pending Case Register as L.P.No.37 of 2009. Admittedly, non-bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioner. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Magistrate and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the Magistrate and files an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of preferably on the Bail Appln.No.7118/2010 : 2 : same day on which it is filed notwithstanding the pendency of non-bailable warrants of arrest against the petitioner and also after considering the explanation offered by the petitioner for his previous non-appearance. With the above observation this application is disposed of. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE skj