IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.734 of 2009 SATTO YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 5 28.7.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner, who is the informant of Chautham P.S. Case No.56 of 1995 under sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 302 of the Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act, seeks a direction to the respondent authorities to arrest the respondent nos.5 to 7 who are accused in the aforesaid case. The grievance of the petitioner is that though respondents 5 to 7 have been declared absconder way back in the year 1997, they had not been arrested as yet. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State, stating therein that charge sheet in this case has been filed in the year 1997 and case of other accused have been separated. Learned State counsel submits that in this case respondent nos.6 and 7 namely Bhutto Yadav and Hareram Yadav were remanded to judicial custody on 25.8.2009 and the accused Kare Yadav is evading his arrest. He submits that the police is taking steps to arrest him, if he has not already been arrested. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court directs the police official particular the Superintendent of Police, Khagaria to take all steps to ensure the arrest of accused Kare Yadav son of Jagdeo Yadav, resident of 2 KHAN Hardia, P.S. Chautham, District Khagaria who is evading his arrest since 1995, if not already arrested. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. (S.P.Singh,J)