AB 1946/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. MERUNO Heard Mr. S. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioners and also Mr. B.S . Sinha, learned Addl. P.P., Assam. By this application, the petitioners Mr. Shukur Ali and Mr. Laskar Ali a pprehending arrest in connection with Barpeta P.S. Case No. 129/11 corresponding to GR Case No. 267/11 registered under Sections 147/447/323/379 IPC have approa ched this Court for releasing them on pre-arrest bail. The learned Addl. P.P. has produced the case dairy of the case. According to the learned Addl. P.P. the evidence so far collected by the Investigating Agency wh ich is revealed in the case dairy there are enough materials to show the petitio ners’ involvement in the alleged offence. Also the said water pump which has bee n procured through the Govt. agency has also been stolen using force and the sam e has been recovered from their possession, which show that the prosecution has a very strong prima facie case against them. Considering the submission of the learned Addl. P.P., and the statements recorde d in the CD, which this Court presumes to be the true statements as narrated by the learned Addl. P.P., this Court is of the considered view that in the fact a nd circumstances of the case, the petitioners are not entitled to be granted the liberty of pre-arrest bail u/s 438 CrPC. In this view of the matter, this bail application stands rejected.