IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.W.J.C. No.7203 of 2008 Kedar Sah, son of late Raghunath Sah, resident of Village Paroo, P.S. Paroo, district Muzaffarpur .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Collector, district Muzaffarpur 3. The Circle Officer, Anchal Paroo, district Muzaffarpur 4. Jitendra Prasad, son of late Ramdeo Sah, resident of village Paroo, P.S. Paroo, district Muzaffarpur .. Respondents **** /2/ 20.04.2009 No one appears for the petitioner. 2. This application has been filed for quashing the orders, dated 24.02.2006, passed by the Collector, Muzaffarpur, in Case No. 44/Misc. of 2002-2003 and the order of the Circle Officer, Paroo, Muzaffarpur, in Basgit Parcha Case No. 7 of 1990-1991. The Circle Officer, Paroo, has passed the order in the light of the direction of the remand order passed by the High Court in C.W.J.C. No. 1744 of 1991. Earlier Basgit Parcha was issued in favour of the petitioner under the provisions of the Bihar Privileged Persons Homestead Tenancy Act, 1947 (in short, ‘the Act’). One Kedar Sah had filed an application for issuance of Basgit Parcha and it was issued in favour of the petitioner, Kedar Sah. Against that Jitendra Prasad, respondent no. 4, - 2 - moved before the High Court stating that Kedar Sah is not a privileged person or privileged tenant. The Parcha has been issued in violation of the provisions of the Act. Subsequent to remand by the High Court, the Circle Officer conducted enquiry as provided under Rule 5 of the Act, heard both the parties and finally came to the conclusion that since the petitioner is not a privileged person or privileged tenant Basgit Parcha could not have been issued in his favour, claim of the petitioner was rejected. Against the order passed by the Circle Officer, the petitioner filed revision before the Collector vide Misc. Case No. 44 of 2002-2003, that has also been dismissed and the order passed by the Circle Officer confirmed. 3. I do not find any infirmity in the orders passed by the Circle Officer, Paroo, or the Collector, Muzaffarpur. 4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. Cp:2/S.A. (Mridula Mishra, J.)