1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2974 OF 2010. (Shri Bapanna Wamanrao Ganjiwar -: versus :- The State of Maharashtra and others.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JULY 06, 2010. Heard Shri R.D. Bhuibar, learned Counsel for petitioners and Shri Sonare, learned A.G.P. for respondents. It appears that the nomination paper is rejected after holding that the proposer of petitioner was in arrears and he also was proposer for another candidate. According to the learned counsel for petitioner, the impugned order dated 10.06.2010 gives only one reason. I have perused that order and also provisions of Rule 56-N [2] of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961. What is the position in bye laws 2 of the Society is not clarified by the petitioner. I am therefore, not inclined to interfere in the matter in writ jurisdiction, as disputed questions arise in the matter. With liberty to the present petitioner to take further appropriate steps as available to him in the matter in accordance with the law, Writ Petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. JUDGE Rgd.