(”V Ma» ‘ " EN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR \ l CONTEMPT PETITION No.34 /2004 y Smg‘ig 3am Jai Kulnar Agarwa! PETITIONER /S/Q 8% Lakhanlal Agrawal, Aged About 68 years, Rio Vi. sage C3edoua, Post Qaiodi TahsiilBaza}ai Dist : kaipurl(c.e.) x ? Tu" i ¥ \ \ \ siw; mWva/wwk’ (Ma f’ny, Etre C5mhissioner Municipa! 3AM Corpcx’tation, Burg-(CG) I I, CO 1TEM?T PETITION UNDER SECTION 10 OF THE CONTEMPT F . OF COURTS ACT. RESE'ONDENT Th9 n’nfiti HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR ’ SINGLE BENCH : HON’BLE SHRI H.L. DATTU. OJ. a Contempt Petition No.36 of 2004 Petitioner Jai Kumar Agarwal Versus i Respondent Shri Chandrakant Uikey J Pksgnt : None for the peiitioner. ‘ ORAL ORDER (Passed on 27‘“ February, 2007) When the matter was called out for hearing, none appeared nor ajny representation was made on behalf of the petitioner. lt appears that the petitioner is not interested in the matter. Therefore, the petition is rejected for non-prosection. i u