a5? ‘34 ” sums mm" IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATI’ISGARH AT BILASPUR 1C.§.) WRIT PETITION S NO. ‘ 6 OF 2010 / Smt. Ramayan Bai Patel, Widow of Late Thirath Ram Patel, aged about 45 years, R/o. village — Navapara, Post Office Moudha, Tahsil - Baloda, District ~ Janjgir— Champa (C.G.) PETITIONER VERSUS L/ State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the Secretary, Agriculture Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). RESPONDENTS 2./ The Sub Divisional Officer (Agriculture), Sub Division Office, Katghora, District — Korba (C.G.) 3. The Senior Account Officer, I Through : Office of the Accountant General, Raipur, District ~ Raipur (C.G.) / / 4. The District Treasurer Officer, Korba, District - Korba (C.G.), WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 Z 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION ’OF INDIA HIGH COURT OE CHHATTESGA H BILASPUR Wn‘t Petition {5) No 666 f 201 O PETmONéR Smt. Ramavan Ba! Patei l ) A E /""‘-~~\_;/~~l k i : i x g ‘ Versus . RESPGNDENT State 9f Chhattis Jarh & Cathers y V y Mii‘nt Perman under Articie 226K227 of the Comtatuhm of indua} § Smgie Bench. Hen ble Shn Satsh K. Agmhotrn J. ’ 5, Present. : $hnP.K.Patei,ceunseiforthe 9emmner. t 3hr: NN. Roy, Pa‘nei Lawyerforthe: State. ORDER (GRAL) (massed on this 15‘“ dav 9f Fabruary. 0‘0} - heard fmaHv 2. This case pertams to gnevance of nan-grant of refirai dues Learned counsei aepeanng for the petmoner an Instructions submits that the ' matter may be referred to the Pension Committee 3. This Court in WPNO 46-42l2004 (Baunath Mandai VS The $taie of Chhattrsaarh & ethers) and other connecred matiers directed the Committee to cowsrder the matter of retrial dues as the disputed queetion or facts were mwived The Committee was constrtuted by the €2tat Government pursuant to the order dated 1S-06—2006 passed in? W P No 1Q61/ZOG6 {Smt Keja Ba: Chandrakar Vs etate Gevernment of Chhattrsgarh and others) and order dated 13-3-2008 passed tn M C C Ne 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattlegarh and ethers Vs Bennett: Manda! and another) Thus this petition ts souarelv covered bv the judgment and order dated 31“ January, 2008 passed m WPNo 4642i2004 (Baignath Mandai (supra) as eubmitted by teamed counsel appearing for the parties GoWi'i This petltian :s accordingiy disposed cf m the same terms i e the office of the Advccate generai Is directed te send the case t0 the Comma-tee Withzn a penod of 15 days from the date of neceipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the Committee shaii iesue notice to ihe petiiioner and offEcers concerned within a further period of 15 {Says The Committee sh‘aH conSider and pass order m accordance With iaw after affording proper oioportumty of hearing to the petitioner Thel petitioner and the offcers concerned may hie additionai documents if necessary. 'fhe entire exercise rnciudmo payment of retirai dues if anv, to the petitioner be completed wrthin a period of four months from the date of receipt o‘ copy of this order The petitioner shai supply one comp ete set of the petition to the $tate counsel for transferring the same to the Committee Sd/- Satlsh K. Agmhotn Judge j;Mew ‘