: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.486 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.248 OF 1985 Tulshiram R. Jadhav & Ors. ....Applicants V/s. State of Maharashtra ....Respondent Mr.P.P. Runwal for the Appellants. CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & S.J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATED : 24TH APRIL, 2009. P.C. : 1. Heard Mr.Runwal, the learned counsel for Applicants who were Accused Nos.2, 3, 5, 10, 11, 15, 17 and 24 in Sessions Case No.10 of 1984 and Criminal Appeal No.248 of 1985 and Criminal Appeal No.445 of 1985 arise from the order of conviction and sentence passed in the said case. 2. By an order dated 22.4.2009, we directed the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Nashik to take appropriate steps to ensure that the present Applicants are produced before us on 27.4.2009 at 9.00 a.m., by police inspector of the concern Police Station at Nashik. This order was communicated : 2 : telephonically to the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Nashik by the Registrar (Judicial). 3. This application has been filed with a prayer to recall our order dated 22.4.2009 as the Applicants are present in Court today. They appeared before the Registrar (Judicial) and their identity, excepting the case of Accused Nos.5 and 6 has been verified, whereas Accused Nos.5 and 6 have been identified by Mr.Runwal. All the Accused have undertaken to remain present before us on 27.4.2009 onwards when both the Criminal Appeals will be taken up for final hearing. We are also informed that Mr.Runwal has filed his V.P. on behalf of the said Accused in both the Criminal Appeals. 4. Hence the application is allowed and our order dated 22.4.2009 shall stand recalled by noting down their undertaking to remain present before us during the final hearing of both the Criminal Appeals. (S.J.VAZIFDAR, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.)