IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 18457 of 2003 Between: Narravula Lakshmaiah S/o Narasaiah, Hindu R/o Burripalem, Tenali Mandal, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Endowments, Endowments Department, Boggulakunta, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Commissioner, Endowments Department, Guntur. 3 The Assistant Commissioner, Endowments Department, Guntur. 4 Sri Lakshmi Narasimha Vari Devasthanam, Rep. by its Person-in- Management, Sri K. Madhava Raju, Burripalem, Tenali Mandal, Guntur District. ..RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MRS M.SUDHA RANI FOR MR.V.S.R.ANJANEYALU Counsel for the Respondents: --- The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is ﬁled for the following substantive relief: “It is, therefore, just and essential that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the proceedings bearing Rc.No.G2/6417/2003-I (22) dated 08-04-2003 issued by the 1st respondent as illegal and ultravires to the provisions of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and also the mandatory provisions of the A.P.Act 30/1987 and the Rules framed thereunder on the subject from time to time and pass such other order.” At the hearing, Smt M.Sudha Rani, learned counsel representing Sri V.S.R.Anjaneyulu, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP Nos.23014 and 23015 of 2003 ﬁled by the petitioner for interim relief are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 13th November, 2008 vrn