- 1 - 572.11 rng IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTI. BAIL APPLICATION NO.572 OF 2011 Raju Makdum Shaikh . Applicant vs State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr.Gunaratan Sadavarte for Applicant Mr.Y.S.Shinde APP for State CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J DATE: 26 th August 2011 P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. The Applicant seek anticipatory bail in crime No.133/2011 registered with Panvel Police station for the offence under section 307 read with section 34 IPC. The learned counsel for the Applicant states that the Applicant is a person of border-line mental status and a student of 10th standard at Ashti. He contends that as per the FIR, the Applicant had used only sticks while the other accused had used sharp weapons. - 2 - 572.11 2. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances, I do not find this case to be fit for grant of anticipatory bail. However, in view of the alleged mental status of the Applicant, he may be given limited protection so that he may surrender before the trial Court and seek bail. 3. Application stands rejected. However, the Applicant is allowed to surrender before the concerned Magistrate on or before 9.9.2011 and seek regular bail. Till then he shall not be arrested. J.H.BHATIA, J