BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT Petitionea^- .i<./ x^.. ^^) **°^ -••' •-•* ^y^ ..••Y7'/" /f~l ^^x" ^<yy° y/^ ^y Versus ^' >w ,,-^° cS BILASPUR P.HO. 3o8 / 2005 (s.ay g' •^' / Bhartiya Karmachari Congress Union Through State President Rajendra Prasad Sharma, Head Office Behind VJvekanand Ashram Near Shatakchhi Mandir Road, Raipur (C.G.). State of Chhattisgarh Through for General Manager Administration Department (employees Welfare Department) Secretariat, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Registrar of Society, Ragistration Office, Raipur- (C.G.). WRIT PET!T!ON^U/A,226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA rt PETITIONER RESPONDENTS HIGH COURT OF CHHATTtSGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETiTION No. 308 OF 2005 Bhartiva Karmachari Conaress Union Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Another 3. (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Abhay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Government Advocate forlhe State. ORDER (Passed on this 27th day of September, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for fhe petitioner submits that the petitioner union made an apptication on 14.09.2004 (Annexure P-4) seeking information as how an applteation is being made for getting the unton registered under the Chhattisgarh/Madhya Pradesh Govemment Servants (Service Association) Ruies, 1967 (for short "the Rules, f9S7'). In stead of giving infonnation, the application was rejected without anv rhvme and reason bv order dated 17.11.2004 (Annexure P-5). Thus, this petition. 2. Shri Sao, learned State counsel submits that the petitioner ought to have made an applteation under Rule 3 ofthe Rules, 1967 and in ttiat case alone, his case Tor registration would be considered. !n view of foregoing, it is not necessary or expedient at this stage to go into the merit of this case. However, on Ihe reauest of iearned counsei appearing for the petitioner, tiberty is reserved to the petitioner to mate an application in accordance with law and if the application is made, the same shall be considered and decided on its own merH, in accordanc® with the provisions of law. as eariv as possible, preferablv within a sshok 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. ! Sd/- j SatishK.Agnihotri Judge