30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 32 10/2007 & CM No.6028/2007 DR.SURESH C.SHARMA,PRINCIPAL M Petitioner Through Mr.SUbodh Markandeya, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Chitra Markandeya versus RAKESH BHAN & ORS. Respondent Through Counsel for R-1 (appearance not given) Mr.Vikas Sethi, Proxy Counsel forR-2. CORAM: • .. HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI ORDER % 09.10.2007 Counsel for the petitioner states that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the respondents have agreed to enhance the age of superannuation of the petitioner to 65 years and the petitioner shall now retire on 30.4.2010. In this regard, counsel for respondent no.1 : has handed over a notice dated 27.5.2007, issued by the petitioner himself and he submits that the writ petition itself was premature as on 4 the date of filing of the writ petition i.e. on 30.5.2007, the petitioner had already been granted extension of 3 years. Counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the fact that the relief as sought for in the present writ petition has been granted to him, nothing further survives for adjudication. He, however adds that respondent no.1 Sh.Rakesh Bhan, is the Ex-Chairman of the Governing Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified I Body of Motilal Nehru College (Evening), has the service book of the petitioner in his custody. If that is so, the respondent no.1 is directed to hand over the service book of the petitioner to the new governing body and in the absence of the new governing body}to the interim governing body, within three weeks. With these directions, the writ petition and pending application are disposed of. OCTOBER 09, 2007 'ns I HIMA KOHLI,J ~Vc Co (V V6 Y '~ "Yy ' e- .