IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.11279 of 2011 ============================================= Raj Kumar, S/o Late Jogendra Das, R/o – Malaya Mahadeo, Jalla Road, Gulzarbagh, P.S. – Alamganj, District – Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The Patna Municipal Corporation through its Mayor, Budh Marg, Patna. 2. Municipal Commissioner cum Chief Executive Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Budh Marg, Patna. 3. Chief Account’s Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Budh Marg, Patna. 4. Executive Officer, Patna City Anchal Patna Municipal Corporation, Meena Bazar, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ============================================= Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey For the Respondent/s : Mr. Arun Kumar ============================================= 2 14-07-2011 Heard Sri Manoj Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Arun Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of all the respondents/Patna Municipal Corporation. The petitioner has claimed in the present writ petition for death-cum-retiral dues of his father who died while functioning as Sanitary Worker in Patna City Anchal, Ward No. 58, Patna Municipal Corporation. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite the fact that father of the petitioner died in harness on 19.01.2008 till date nothing has been paid in respect of death-cum-retiral dues of his father. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that petitioner has filed number of representations. However, all went in vain. In view of the facts and circumstances the court is of the opinion that to avoid further delay without affording opportunity for filing counter affidavit the writ petition can be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no. 2/Municipal Commissioner- cum-Chief Executive Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, respondent no. 2 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law redressing the grievances of the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of filing of such representation. If respondent no. 2 considers the claim of petitioner as genuine he is required to pass order for clearance of all death-cum-retiral dues of the petitioner within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal respondent no. 2 is required to pass speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within aforesaid time i.e. two months from the date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction the writ petition stands disposed of. PRAFUL (Rakesh Kumar, J)