IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1869 WRIT PETITION NO.1869 WRIT PETITION NO.1869 OF OF OF 2005 2005 2005 Hira Navaji Chauhan .. Petitioner Versus Union of India & Others .. Respondent Mr. A.K. Chauhan for the petitioner. Mr. Y.S. Shinde A.P.P., for the respondents. CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 4TH OCTOBER, 2005 P.C. : 1. Heard Mr. Chauhan, the learned Counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner has prayed that the respondents should issue 72 hours notice in writing in case of any complaint against him. We find that the allegations in the petition and the prayers are vague. As of today, admittedly no case is registered against the petitioner. The learned A.P.P. on instructions from Mr. Bhargude,P.I., DCB CID Unit X of Bandra Police station states that as of today no case is registered against the petitioner. In view of this,the prayer made in the petition cannot be granted. However, if any case is registered against the petitioner, he will be at : 2 : liberty to file a fresh petition. Undisputedly at that stage the Court dealing with the said petition will pass appropriate order thereon after hearing both the sides. The petition is disposed of in the aforestated terms. [SMT. [SMT. [SMT. RANJANA P. DESAI, J.] RANJANA P. DESAI, J.] RANJANA P. DESAI, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]