IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3124 of 2005 AWADESH KUMAR VERMA son of late Mukti Nath resident of village and P.O. Bansohi, P.S.Masrakh, Distt-Saran at present residing at East Indrapuri, P.O.Keshri Nagar,and P.S. Patliputra, Distt-Patna- Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Commissioner and Secretary, Road Construction Department, Bihar, Patna 3. Engineer-in-Chief, Road Construction Department, Bihar, Patna 4. The Executive Engineer, Mechanical,Road Construction Department, Ara 5. The Treasury Officer, Patna Secretariat at Vishwawariya Bhawan, Patna 6. The District Provident Fund Officer, Ara.— Respondents. ----------- 3. 6.1.2010. The petitioner retired from the services of the State from the post of Special Foreman with effect from 31.7.2004, has filed this writ petition for payments of 10 % pension, 10% gratuity, commutation of pension and the amount of General Provident Fund. A counter affidavit was filed on behalf of respondent nos.2,3 and 4 and in para-4 thereof, it was mentioned that the P.P.O. had been issued by the Accountant General, Bihar in favor of the petitioner vide memo dated 20.1.2005 authorising the pension. It has further been mentioned that the gratuity payment order vide memo dated 20.1.2005 has been issued in favour of the petitioner after adjusting the provisional pension and gratuity, if any, paid 2 by the department. It has also been mentioned that pension commutation order has also been issued authorizing payment vide memo dated 20.1.2005. It has also been mentioned that final authority for General Provident Fund amount has been issued in favour of the petitioner on 15.10.2004. It is further stated in para-7 that the entire retiral dues of the petitioner has been paid to him as per rules. The counter affidavit was filed as back as on 4.10.2005 but no rejoinder has been filed by the petitioner controverting the said statements. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. ahk (Jyoti Saran,J.)