: J? :§ % ‘ O CG. F JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR ' CONTEMPT PEImON N0. $§ /2004 14. The Sud Divisional O$cer Ambikapur Distt. - Sarguja (C.G.) CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT AND UNDER ARTICLES/2T5 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. The above named petitioner begs to submit as under: m gishwanath, S/o. Ghuran @ Ramdas R/o. Vill. Luchki, Krantiprakashpur, Ambikapur, Distt. Sarguja. V_ERSUS V . RESPONDENTS: 1. Lusuram S/o. Fekhil, 2. Nansai, S/o. Musu 3. Bitan Ram S/o. Chikan 4. Somarsai S/o. Madhuram 5. Duhanram S/o. Bhoth “(if 6. Bendoram S/o. Julum //.": 7. Matukdhari S/o. Jeetu //.": {\QQ: of 8. Baudharam S/o. Sarai $93: é’ W“ 9. Sudhanram S/o. Tohela Q. Kg z? 51 u 10. Tejuram S/o. Tohela 11. Rajuram S/oV Sadhu ‘ .1/ 12. Mangalram S/o. Son§ai 13. Boyaram s/o. Badhwa All residence ofVil]. Krantiprakashpur RS. Ambikapur Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON’BLE SHRI H.L. DATTU, CJ. s Present : None for the petitioner. V ORAL ORDER (Passed on 27E" February, 2007) When the matter was called out for hearing, none appeared nor any representation was made on behalf of the petitioner. lt appears that the petitioner is not interested in the matter. Therefore. the /"m /" ‘ e petition is rejected for non-prosecutionK,-//.Sdl‘ Contempt Petition NO.18 of 2004 Petitioner Vishwanath Versus Respondents Lusuram & others