IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 8TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 17TH KARTHIKA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 6951 of 2010() ----------------------------- CP.85/2009 of J.M.F.C.,THIRUVALLA .................... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED --------------------------------------- 1. PRAMOD, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O. BALASUNDARAN PILLAI, KAIPATTA THEKKAETHIL HOUSE, KAIPATTA,MALLAPPALLY WEST MURI,MALLAPPALLY VILLAGE,PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 2. JOBI CHACKO, AGED 24 YEARS, S/O.BABU CHACKO, OORIYAKUNNATHU HOUSE, MALLAPPALLY WEST MURI MALLAPPALLY VILLAGE,PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.S.MANU SRI.S.K.PREMRAJ RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT ----------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KEEZHVAIPUR POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT,(NOTICE TO WHOM MAY BE SERVED ON PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM) PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ------------------------------- Bail Application No.6951 of 2010 ------------------------------- DATED: 08.11.2010 O R D E R Petitioners, who are accused Nos.1 and 2 in C.P. No.85 of 2009 on the files of J.F.C.M, Thiruvalla, seek anticipatory bail. 2. Admittedly, non-bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioners. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no reason why the petitioners should not surrender before the Magistrate and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioners surrender before the Magistrate and file an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of preferably on the same day on which it is filed notwithstanding the pendency of non-bailable warrants of arrest against the petitioners. With the above observation this application is disposed of . V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. sj