IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 8088 of 2002 Between: Andhra Pradesh State Ware Housing Corporation and other Godowns Mutta Workers Union, Regd. No. 939, Rep. by its Secretary, Vallepu Vasu, S/o Anjaiah aged about 28 years, R/o Hariprasadnagar, Perala-Chirala Mandal, Prakasam District. Perala-Chirala Mandal, Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 State Ware Housing Corporation A.P., Rep. by its Managing Director Nampally, Hyderabad. 2 State Ware Housing Corporation Rep. by its Ware House Manager, Chellareddypalem, Vetapalem Mandal, Prakasam District. 3 Sri Myneni Subba Rao Chellareddypalem, Vetapalem Mandal, Prakasam District. 4 K. Sreemannarayana S/o Pattabhiramaiah Chellareddypalem, Vetapalem Mandal, Prakasam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate or order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, directing the Respondent No.1 and 2 to insist the respondents No. 3 and 4 to engaged the workers numbering 64 of the petitioner Society before engaging other workers in the godown of respondents No.3 and 4 at Challareddypalem, Vetapalem Mandal, Prakasam District, after calling for the records and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.NUTHALAPATI KRISHNA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondents: SMT.V.MEENAKSHI The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 8088 of 2002 O R D E R: Since there was no representation for the petitioner on 11.02.2009, the matter is listed today under the Caption “For Dismissal”. Even today, none appeared for the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. ____________ G.ROHINI,J 12th February 2009 KH