IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5998 of 2010 ***** Bhairaw Nand Sharma, Advocate, son of Sri Tapeshwar Sharma, resident of Mohalla- C.D.A. Colony, P.S. Shastri Nagar, District-Patna, Bihar. …. …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Principal Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Department of Water Resources, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Engineer-in-Chief, Department of Water Resources, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Chief Engineer, Patna Sone Canal (East), Khagaul, P.S.-Khagaul, District-Patna. 5. The Executive Engineer, Patna Sone Canal (East), Daudnagar, P.S. Daudnagar, District-Aurangabad. 6. The Sub-Divisional Officer (Awar Pramandal Padadhikari), Patna Sone Canal (East), Aganoor, P.S.-Kaler, District-Arwal, Bihar. …. …. Respondents ----------- 2. 7.4.2010. The petitioner, who appears in person, has preferred the writ petition, as pro bono publico, alleging that the funds are being sanctioned for reconstruction of a parallel channel, which was stopped in the year 1999 by the respondents and further the said funds are not utilised for the requisite purpose. On a perusal of the writ petition and the documents, we find, barring a bald assertion, there is no document to show that there has been any kind of allotment for reconstruction of the parallel channel. - 2 - In view of the aforesaid, as advised at present, we are not inclined to interfere. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Pawan/- (Dipak Misra, CJ) (Mihir Kumar Jha, J)