Writ Petition Le) No. 1491 of 2007 : Smt. La Mahiinge at a Versus :1. mfChhattisga through the Secretary. at d a W D (G. 2. Th Director, e Panchayat & ocia Weiiar iput 3. Surya Kumar Khande Sl hr Kashi R Khand Rio Vil. Risada Th. etur Distt. Biiasi' (C.) Pnchaya an Socii eifare Department, .K.s. Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur C.) s_3_ ’ Present: Mr. Prafull Bharat, counse for the petitioner. l (Passe on this 14‘" day or arch. 2007) d M 7 f t n 1. By this petition. tiied under Article 22 o he Constitutio of India. the petitioner challenges the validity of the order dated 13.2.2007 (PM) passed by the Director Panchayat & Social Welfare, Raipur. whereunder the appeal No. 8IA-89 (3)10506 of the respondent No. 3 herein. was restored to the file. which has been dismissed earlier for want of prosecution. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the respondent No. 3 has not shown sufficient cause for restoration of the HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA$PUR Petitioner Wlo Shri Satish Mahiiange, 22 yrs. R/o WI. Risada, Te.Masturi h, r ) District Biiaspu (C.G.. Res99ngenE seom Si e Ra o Si am e i e Mai pu G. Honble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. onogn a)” appeal in his application at Annexure P/3. Thus, the said application ought to have been rejected. The trial court has found that sufficient cause has been shown, while restoring the appeal, which was dismissed for want of prosecution. There is no intimity. illegality or jurisdictional error to warrant interference with the order passed by the court below. Thus, this petition is dismissed. Consequently, M.(W.)P. No. 966/2007 stands disposed of. ‘l i Sd,‘ mott‘.‘ ‘ " K Ag“ /-’* Saf‘S Judge i i