CW 565/10 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Civil Writ Petition No.565/2010 Gyaneshwar Kr. Pareek Versus State & Ors. Date of Order ::: 25/02/10 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Anoop Dhand, for petitioner Counsel submits that the petitioner was though appointed as Helper but from the date of his initial appointment, is discharging duties in the ministerial cadre as Store Munshi and a list of similarly situated employees, who are working & discharging duties in ministerial cadre, was demanded by respondents to grant them status of semi-permanent & permanent under the Work Charged Service Rules, 1964. Counsel further submits that those who are similarly situated and recommended along with the petitioner, have been declared semi- permanent and permanent under the Work Charge Service Rules as Store Munshi vide Annexure-6 dated 15th April, 2007 but no reason has been assigned so far regarding candidature of the petitioner despite legal notice of demand for justice being served. Counsel submits that in identical matter (CWP-3730/09 decided vide order dt.04/09/09) this Court directed to file fresh representation. Without expressing any opinion on CW 565/10 //2// merits, the writ petition stands disposed of with direction to the petitioner to submit fresh representation within one month raising his grievance before competent authority which may objectively consider the same and pass speaking order in accordance with law within three months thereafter from the submission of representation and communicate its decision to him who if still feels aggrieved, will be free to avail remedy under law. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p2/ 565CW2010-Fb25DspRepStorMunsi.doc