IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6632 of 2009 MANOJ PASWAN SON OF NAGINA PASWAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ALI NEURA,P.S.MINAPUR,DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.9808 of 2009 PAWAN MAHTO SON OF SRI MAHENDRA MAHTO RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KANTI KASBA GOPI TOLA,P.S.KANTI,DISTT.MUZAFFARPUR Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.10622 of 2009 RAM ISHWAR MAHTO SON OF RAKTU MAHTO RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ALINEWRA,P.S.MINAPUR,DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 27.3.2009 Since all the above three applications arise out of one and the same police case, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The petitioners seek bail in a case which has been registered for offence under Section 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Informant’s daughter Pushpa Kumari was allegedly kidnapped by Rajesh Kumar Jha, Rameshwar Mahto, Manoj Paswan and Nagendra Pandey. Thereafter she was recovered and her statement under Section 164 of Code of Criminal Procedure has been recorded in which she stated that she was enticed away by Rajesh Kumar Jha and others . They took her to Delhi on the pretext of marrying with her but she was left at Delhi. One Pawan Kumar came for her rescue and married with him. The victim appears to be a grown up girl. The court below has assessed her age 18 years. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten 2 thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with petitioners of Cr.Misc.Nos. 6632 of 2008 and 9808 of 2009, both in Minapur P.S.Case No. 102 of 2008 and to the satisfaction of Shri Saheb Kaushar, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Muzaffarpur in connection with petitioner of Cr.Misc.No.10622 of 2009 in Minapur P.S.Case No. 102 of 2008,G.R.No. 1859 of 2008. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)