IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR SECOND APPEAL No.5 of 2000 BETWEEN Perecherla Sitamma (died) and another. …APPELLANTS AND Perecherla Venkata Subbamma. …RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellants: MR. V.S.R. ANJANEYULU Counsel for the Respondent: MR. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTHY The Court made the following: - JUDGMENT: Learned counsel for the appellants reports no instructions and submits that he had himself deposited the costs, as ordered by this Court dated 17.02.2011, though he had no instructions from the appellants. In that view of the matter, it is apparent that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. The second appeal is accordingly dismissed. However, the learned counsel for the appellants having shown bonafides in depositing the costs, irrespective of the instructions of the appellants, shall be entitled to withdraw the aforesaid costs from the Registry. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J February 25, 2011 DSK