HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.17881 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.03.2011 **** Surmukh Singh & Anr. . . . . Petitioner(s) VS. Pepsu Road Transport Corporation & Anr. . . . . Respondent(s) **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s) Mr. Anupam Singla, Advocate for the respondent(s) ***** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) The matter pertains to recoveries having been effected from the leave salary as well as Gratuity of the petitioner on account of wrong pay fixation. The petitioner admittedly never misrepresented the facts or deceived the authority for gaining such monetary benefits. That being so, no recovery can be allowed to be effected from the petitioner in view of the Full Bench decision rendered in Budh Ram & Others vs. State of Haryana & Others, 2009(3) PLR 511. The impugned action of the respondents is accordingly set at naught and the amounts so recovered are ordered to be refunded to the petitioner within the same timeframe as set out in CWP No.19084 of 2009 (Malkit Singh & Anr. v. Pepsu Road Transport Corporation & Anr.) and other connected matters whereby the claim of retired/serving employees of the Corporation has been disposed of vide an even-dated order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 03.03.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge