1 criapln3194-2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3194 OF 2011 1] Medikonda Sheshu Kumar S/o Prabhakar Rao .. APPLICANT Vs 1] The State of Maha. And Another ...RESPONDENTS ... Shri S.J.Salunke, Adv.for applicant. Shri N.H.Borade,APP for R-State. ... CORAM : T.V.NALAWADE,J. DATE : 02/08/2011 ORAL ORDER: 1] This application is filed for anticipatory bail in Crime No.155/10 registered in Bhingar Camp police station, Ahmednagar, Dist.Ahmednagar, for offence punishable under Section 306 of I.P.C. Papers of investigation were made available. Heard both sides. 2] Crime is registered on the basis of report given by mother of deceased woman. It is the case of the mother that from about 10-15 2 criapln3194-2011 days prior to the date of incident, deceased had started saying to her that the present applicant who was her college-mate was harassing her. Deceased had supplied 2 mobile numbers and she had disclosed that on phone present applicant was giving abuses in filthy language and he was giving threat that he would see that the husband takes divorce from her. He was demanding Rs.1 Lakh from the deceased. Parents of the deceased had given promise to see that the applicant is prevented from harassing her but before they could contact the applicant and they could prevent the activities, the deceased committed suicide by hanging herself. 3] Deceased had left behind 2 suicide notes in which she has mentioned the name of the present applicant as the person who was harassing her. She has specifically mentioned that present applicant was black-mailing her, and so she was committing suicide. She was newly married and even after marriage, present applicant was harassing her due to previous contacts. APP submitted that record in respect of mobile number of the deceased is collected but record in respect of other mobile number which is said to be used by applicant needs to be collected. It was submitted for the applicant that this mobile number is not in the name of the applicant. There is aforesaid allegation and police can find out as to who and how was using the number. This is serious crime and in view of aforesaid circumstances, this Court holds that custodial interrogation needs to be made. Some 3 criapln3194-2011 more material can come out due to custodial interrogation. So this Court holds that it is not fit case to grant anticipatory bail. So, Application is rejected. [T.V.NALAWADE,J.] umg/criapln3194-11