41 7 9 CR No1683 of 2008 and 0 CR No1684of2008 INTHE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB 8 HARYANA CHANDIGARH CR No1683 of 2008 Dateofdecision March 16 2009 Gurnam Singh Petitioner Versus s Wassan Singhand another C 0 0 CR No1684 of 2008 I Gurnam Singh Petitioner Versus SanjeevKumar and another Z eeeeRespondents CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE K KANNAN Present None for the petitioner c8 Mr K GuptaAdvocate for Mr SukhbirSinghAdvocate for the respondent VJ Z 5 5 5 1 VVhetherreporters of Iocalpapers may be allowed tls to see thejudgment7 2 To be referredto the reporters or not7 3 Whether thejudgmentshould be reportedin the digest7 K Kannan J Iorall 1 The two revision petitionsare against orders dismissingthe applicationfor amendment of petitionprosecutedunder Section 13 of the East PunjabUrban Rent RestrictionAct 1949 and giving uphis pleaunder Section 1344 of the said Act which was filed as though he was a specifiedIandlord The amendmentwas soughton the basis of objections taken bythe tenant that the petitionwas not maintainableunder JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 42 CR No1683 of 2008 and 1 CR No1684 of 2008 Section 13A In one of the cases arisingout of the same batch this Honble Court has alreadyheld in its decision in 1 No 1762 of 2008 that the amendment could be allowed and that no objectioncould be taken by the tenant This decision shall follow the rendering of the decision in Civil Revision No1762 of 2008 2 The Civil revision petitionsare therefore allowed on conditionthat the Iandlordshall pay Rsl 00001 as costs to the tenant 01 0 which could be paid directlyto the tenant NeedIess to state that the U tenantwill have adequate opportunity to Ole additionaiwrittenstatementto the amendedpetitionand Iead evidence in supportof the pleadings 0 1 1K KANNANI Z JUDGE March 16 2009 2 archana r Oa c8 7 Z Ol 31 JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document