1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39194 of 2011 1. Niraj Giri @ Niraj Kumar Giri 2. Dhiraj Giri @ Dhiraj Kumar Giri, Both S/o Late Satyadeo Giri R/o Village- Tenuath Mathiya, P.S. Dinara, District-Rohtas. –Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar --Opp.party 2 05.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners are named accused in this case with allegation of catching hold of the informant followed by assault by non-petitioner Bijoy Giri, who, as submitted, happens to be own son of the informant. Submission is that parties have already entered into compromise resolving the dispute and compromise petition is on record. While objecting the prayer it is pointed out that in order to pursue compromise, informant was coerced causing institution of another case bearing Dinara P.S. Case no. 217 of 2009 though in this case parties have entered into compromise. Considering the facts and circumstances, 2 in the event of the informant appearing before the court below on due identification accepts factum of compromise with her free will and consent and one of the bailers must be a local public representative, the petitioners, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Bikramgamj, Rohtas in Dinara P.S. Case no. 189 of 2009, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that petitioners shall remain present before the court below till disposal of the case. In case of failure to remain present on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. AAhmad ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)