THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.20951 of 2009 Date: 25.09.2009 Between: M. Mohammed Sohel Malik ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Represented by its Commissioner, Near Tankbund Road, Hyderabad and others. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ALI FAROOQ Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: SRI RADHA KRISHNA REDDY, SC FOR GHMC Counsel for the Respondent No.3: THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING : ORDER: This writ petition is filed questioning the action of respondents 1 and 2 in not taking any action on the representation of the petitioner, dated 20.08.2009, with regard to the illegal constructions made by the third respondent. It is the case of the petitioner that he is the owner and possessor of house bearing Municipal No.17-1-182/A/151 to 154 situated at Madannapet, Hyderabad. He alienated house bearing No.17-1- 181/M/206/A and also a portion of house bearing No. 17-1-182/A/151 to 154 in favour of the third respondent by way of a registered sale deed dated 12.01.2009. His grievance is that the third respondent is making illegal constructions in the part of the house, which is abutting and adjacent to his house. Therefore, he made representations to the respondent-Corporation on 15.07.2009 and 20.08.2009 requesting the authorities to take immediate action and demolish the illegal constructions made by the third respondent. But, so far, the respondent-Corporation has not taken any action against the third respondent. Hence, this writ petition. The learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation appearing for respondents 1 and 2 submits that since the representation of the petitioner dated 20.08.2009 is pending consideration before the first respondent, instead of this Court going into merits of the matter, the first respondent may be directed to dispose of the said representation expeditiously, for which course of action, the learned counsel for the petitioner also agreed. In the circumstances, without going into the merits of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent-the Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 20.08.2009, and take necessary action against the third respondent, after issuing notice to him, expeditiously. N.V.RAMANA,J Date: 25.09.2009 va