THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.26017 of 2000 ORDER: Under the impugned proceedings dated 25.03.2000, the case of the petitioners, for regularization of their services, was rejected for the reason that there are no sanctioned posts in the respondent Corporation. There is no necessity of going into all the details. While admitting the writ petition on 17.04.2001, the respondents were directed to continue the petitioners in service, if they are in service as on that day. Subsequently, on filing a vacate petition being WVMP.No.917 of 2001, this Court, by order dated 18.04.2002, vacated the interim order passed on 17.04.2001 noticing that the petitioners were not in service even at the time of passing of the interim order. In the counter affidavit filed by the respondents, it is stated that the 2nd respondent submitted proposals to consider the case of the petitioners, but since there were no sanctioned posts, the case of the petitioners could not be considered. In the facts and circumstances of the case and also the averments made in the counter affidavit, no orders need be passed in this writ petition, and the writ petition is liable to be dismissed having become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, it is made clear that for any reason, if the case of petitioners is considered in the meanwhile, the same shall not be disturbed. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU,J 26.11.2010 v v