IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.921 of 2010. Decided on: April 5, 2010 Param Dev ….. Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge. For the Petitioner : Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General for respondents No. 1 and 2. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by Annexure P-5 order of transfer. It is submitted that the petitioner has only nine months to retire from service. The learned Senior Additional Advocate General submits that the impugned order has been made only to accommodate the petitioner near to his residence. The petitioner submits that the order does not serve the purpose in terms of the guidelines. The petitioner further submits that he may be given an opportunity to make representation before the first respondent pointing out also other vacancies available near to his residence. In the event of the petitioner making such a representation within a week from 2 today, the matter will be considered by the first respondent and appropriate order, taking note of the choice indicated by the petitioner, shall be passed, subject to availability of the vacancy within another one month. Till orders are passed, interim order passed by this Court will continue. The Writ Petition is disposed of, so also the pending application. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice April 5, 2010 (Justice R.B. Misra), (rks) Judge.