IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 8TH MARCH 2010 / 17TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 366 of 2010(U) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SREEJITH.V.A, AGED 33 YEARS, S/O.ARJUNAN,VADAKKETTATHU HOUSE, PUNNAPRA NORTH, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.S.SHANAVAS KHAN. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,COLLECTORATE, ALAPPUZHA. 2. THE TAHSILDAR,TALUK OFFICE, AMBALAPPUZHA. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER,PARAVUR PUNNAPRA(P.O),ALAPPUZHA. 4. THE PUNNAPRA NORTH GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 5. V.W.SIMON,S/O.WILSON,VELIYIL HOUSE, WARD NO.13,PUNNAPRA NORTH GRAMA PANCHAYATH, P.O 688 004,ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. V. MANU, R4 BY ADVS. MR.PHILIP T.VARGHESE, MR.THOMAS T.VARGHESE, R5 BY ADV. MR.M.R.SUDHEENDRAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/03/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.366/2010-U: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.1. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE LETTER DTD. 07/11/08 ISSUED BY THE R.1. TO THE R.2. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE APPLICATION DTD. 03/07/09 PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.2. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DTD. 24/07/09 OF THE R.2. TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.1. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE REPLY GIVEN BY THE R.3. TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P.7: COPY OF THE LETTER DTD. 12/06/09 OF THE R.1. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. Prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J ------------------- W.P.(C).366/2010 -------------------- Dated this the 8th day of March, 2010 JUDGMENT Petitioner's complaint is regarding the alleged trespass by the 5th respondent. It is seen that complaining of this, petitioner and several others have filed Ext.P1 complaint before the 4th respondent. What is sought for in this writ petition is a direction to the 4th respondent to take action on Ext.P1 in the light of Ext.P6 reply given by the Village Officer and Ext.P7 letter by the District Collector. 2. Having regard to the limited nature of the relief sought for, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 4th respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P1 in the light of Exts.P6 and P7. This shall be done with notice to the 5th respondent and as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner may produce a copy of this judgment along with W.P.(C).366/10 2 the copy of the writ petition, before the 4th respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs