IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. ^~^£ 0/20^ Petitioner : SAVITA GUPTA, AGED - 40 YRS., W/OATULGUPTA, R/o 9, South Avenue, Chaube Colony, Raipur RESPONDENTS: fc^^^' I<»..' Versus l. Naya Raipur Development Authority, Thro' its Chairman, Office at: Near Mantralaya, ^- Mahanadi Gate, Raipur (CG) 2. Collector (Revenue) Raipur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 THE CONSmUTjQN OFINDIA ^••••^6^"-..---^ ^'^<^^ ^ sn^cqii 1 t^lW 311^1 ?^i(^ ^i^r ~3~^ •<11<llCiq, ®fll<H'IS,iqdl^y ^IT^T ^R^R . ^.•l^..^.:91§i'L^ *<IMCTI %~Hrai SII^I^RIWHftB SB : Hon^le Shri Manindra Moh 31.01-2011 Shri Raja Sharma, oounael Shri A. S. Kachhawaha,cou Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel La Heard. Learned counset for the pe1 owner of fhe land bearing Khas P.C.No.70/17, R.I.C. Mandir Hasai was a oonsent for acquisition of thereof on the basis of the fact Thereafter, the compensation is b< non-irrigated land. Shri A. S. Kachhawaha, le< Shri Arvind Dubey, learned Par submitted that there is a dispute] according to the respondents, it is petitioner, it is an irrigated land. going to determine and give con1 possible, having regard to the nat| respondents further submitted that| earliest within a period of eight we^ Be that as it may, if a repref authorities/Collector, Raipur, ques]) shall be oonsidered and ctecided,! merits, before determining the con]i 'Wfeftf llTtRff •?-fSi^ •(fsTRTt iTSlfigiisn^i b Shrivastava. J. (r the petjtioner. tsel for respondent No.1. |vyer for the State/respondent No.2. Itioner submits that the petitioner is the ra No. 321, 330, 297-Viltage-Kuhera, d, Tehsil Aarang, Distrfct Raipur. There :he land on payment of compensatjon that the said land was irrigated land. ing determined treating the same to be 'ned counsel for respondent No.1 and el Lawyer for respondent No.2/State with regard to nature of the land, as non-irrigated land and according to the lowever, the respondent authorities are pensation to the petitioner as early as ire of the land. Learned counsel for the shall be considered and decyed at the ks. enfation is made by the petitioner to the ioning the nature of the land, the same in accordanoe with law and on its own )ensation. '?fer't .:L.. <?.sys.«tL] ,SpnC s'f^seM-l^s B: -fpS eel^ •yo pesodap si 'eBeis SIL|} ys uoffeoiFtnfpe jq saMAjns BuiCltdu ~'J9tloi}!t9d 9Lj) joj Buueedde issunoo psujesi 0} 6u lii^ltc. hfrJK» tb >]»>toj»[?,9J jt jl-lhih t.jbUjbitfc uoi}!}8d }UM SL]I 'A|Buipjooov pjoooe 'SuioBsjo.! y> /waiA u| ll?T./5>-J-^"^PJ'{C^ itelhtlS lUhlh iEtyi^j. 'Sliftlll®'bWlblb- ^S. ca] ifclhDS tt^lte^ - I'fe.li^UE /.*!c);" '<•., ,<!'<-~iili-, ' ^ ^Ssy'vt ZZ-3H-K""'" ''I ^.^ 'v: •'"A~?S3T1