1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.: 13076 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION [St] NO.: 4367 OF 2007 *** 1. We have heard learned counsel Mr. S.B. Bhapkar for the Applicant as well as Mr. V.B.Ghatge for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5 who vehemently objected and submitted that the application bears no substance and deserves to be dismissed. 2. This is an application preferred by the Applicant [original petitioner] for condonation of delay of 1158 days caused in filing application for restoration of writ petition which came to be dismissed for non- compliance of office objection. 3. For the reasons stated in the application and more particularly in para 5, application deserves to be allowed, however, subject to payment of costs of Rs.1,000/- to the Respondents. 4. In the result, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) and (C) 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. thereof subject to payment of costs of Rs. 1,000/- to be paid by the Applicant to the Respondents within a period of two weeks. The office objection as regards to supply of English translation of the order impugned stands dispensed with. However, the applicant/ petitioner is directed remove other office objections, if any, within a period of two weeks from today. [SHRIHARI P.DAVARE,J.] [S.B.DESHMUKH, J.] Dated:01/10/2010. ans/13076