IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1604 of 2008 BISHWANATH JHA Versus SMT.USHA DEVI & ANR ----------- 2 19.9.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioner. This Court does not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order refusing to restore the matrimonial case filed by the petitioner for two reasons namely:- (i) the petitioner gave an undertaking to the Court in course of conciliation proceedings that he will take his wife back and will lead his life peacefully but, the petitioner did not do so and thereafter, resiled from his promise and (ii) the matrimonial case came to be dismissed on 1.2.2007 and the restoration application was filed after more than one year i.e. on 6.2.2008 and not a word was said about such delay in filing of the said restoration application. That being so, this Court would not find any reason to give indulgence and protection to a person who does not abide by his own words. Accordingly, this civil revision application must be and is hereby dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)