IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-29503 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: October 14, 2011 Rahul & another .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Sameer Sachdev, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Sukhvinder Singh Nara, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that respondent Nos.4 and 5 have accepted the marriage of the petitioners and therefore, cause of action does not survive. 2. Petitioners are present in person and state that the petition has become infructuous because cause of action does not survive. The two are living happily in the matrimonial home. 3. The petition is disposed as infructuous. Crl. Misc. No. M- of 2011 [2] (AJAI LAMBA) October 14, 2011 JUDGE avin