IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5752 of 2011 ARVIND KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3. 27.04.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the contractor is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 406, 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioner is that he was authorized to transport the transformers but two transformers could not reach to the consignee’s place. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that at the request of the petitioner two transformers were seized in front of the godown of one Rajendra Kumar in Agam Kuan. It is further submitted that transformers could not be lifted by the Electricity Board for which the petitioner can not be faulted. Considering the nature of accusation and the fact that transformers have been seized, let the petitioner, above named, be 2 released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Nawanagar P.S. Case No. 123 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Buxar, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)