FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2954 OF 2010 (Sahakar Maharshi Balasaheb Pawar Krushi Va Gramin Vikas Sanstha Vadod (Kh). Khultabad, Dist. Aurangabad Vs. Govt. of India and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. S.S. Thombre, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. K.M. Suryawanshi, AGP for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATED : 15th October, 2010. PER COURT : 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the proposal of the petitioner has not been forwarded as there were certain deficiencies, the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the petition. He further submits that he would remove the deficiencies and upon removal of the deficiencies, the proposal of the petitioner be directed to be reconsidered by the respondent Nos. 2 and 3. 2. We, therefore, allow the petitioner to withdraw the petition. It is directed that in case the petitioner removes the deficiencies in its proposal, the same shall be reconsidered by the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 and if the petitioner is found to be eligible for grant-in-aid and the deficiencies in the said proposal are complied with, the case of the petitioner would be considered for recommendation in accordance with law. [ A. A. SAYED ] [ B. R. GAVAI ] Judge Judge ssc/wp2954.10