CRR No. M-797 of 2009 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. CRR No. M-797 of 2009 (O&M) Decided on:- 21.07.2009 Mahipal ……Petitioner Versus Kandy Finlease Ltd. …….Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice K. C. Puri Present Mr. J. S. Mor, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ashwani Kumar Bura, Advocate for the respondent. K. C. Puri, J.(Oral ) This is a revision petition against the order dated 4.3.2009, passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Jind, vide which the appeal preferred by the present petitioner against the order of conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act was dismissed. The present petitioner issued a cheque for Rs.60,000/- which was bounced and culminated into the complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. After completion of trial, petitioner was convicted and thereafter aggrieved by the above said judgment of conviction passed by Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jind dated 11.4.2008, preferred the appeal, that appeal was also dismissed vide impugned judgment dated 4.3.2009. Now the parties have arrived at a compromise. Affidavit of Ram Kumar, Proprietor of Kandy Finlease Ltd. has been filed in which it is mentioned that parties have compromised the matter and full payment has been received. Learned counsel for the complainant has also conceded at bar that matter has been compromised. So, in these circumstances, both the orders dated 4.3.2009 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Jind and order dated 11.4.2008, passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jind stands set aside on the basis of compromise and accused stands acquitted. It is stated at bar that an amount of Rs.1,000/- has been paid as fine in the trial Court. That amount is ordered to be considered as costs of CRR No. M-797 of 2009 2 litigation. The petitioner is directed to deposit an amount of Rs.4,000/- in addition to the amount of Rs.1,000/- in the trial Court as costs of litigation. The petition stands disposed of. July 21, 2009 ( K.C. Puri ) mamta Judge