HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM‘. HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON’BLE SHRI MANINDRA M. SHRIVASTAVA, J. Misc Appeal No.319 of 2005 Appellant Anil Kumar Sethi, S/o Subhas Chandra Sethi, aged about 35 years, Occupation - Medical Representative, R/o lshwar Pushpha Niwas at Atarmuda, Raigarh, District Rigarh VERSUS Respondents 1. Santosh Kumar, S/o Rajkumar Agrawal, aged about 23 years, Occupation — Owne of Vehicle R/o Pathalgaon, district — Jashpurnagar (CG)(Owner) 2. Jagannath Singh Netam, S/o Suresh Sai Netam, aged about 34 years, Occupation — Driver, R/o Patrapali, Pathalgaon, Dist Jashpurnagar (Driver) 3. Branch Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited, Branch Officer, Ambikapur (Surguja) (CG) (insurer) Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Present : None for the appellant. Shri Sanjay Agrawal, counsel for respondent No.1. Shri HB Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Ms Iturani Mukherjee, counsel for respondent No.3. ORDER (191“ December, 2009) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. None for the appellant. 2) As there is no representation on behatf of the appeHant, .we are teft with no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Judge l ' I Judge subbu l l l 3) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. ‘ \ . ,t Sdl— ' Sd/. l alief Jusu'ce ‘Manindra Mohan Shrivastava