IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34193 of 2008 MUKHIYA MUSHAHAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 11.11.2008 Heard Sri B.J.Ojha, Advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The case is under Section 395 IPC and the petitioner is not named in the FIR as one of the dacoits though some reference has come in context to the name of the petitioner that he is Bahnoie of one of the dacoits. The rejection order indicates as if the petitioner had been identified in test identification parade. The contention is that the identification is in consequential in the light of the fact that the petitioner was well known to the informant. Let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J.-F.T.C.-IVth, Aurangabad in S.Tr.No.72 of 2008/82 of 2008(Aurangabad(M)P.S.Case No.132 of 2007). B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )