IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 20TH AUGUST 2009 / 29TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 23793 of 2009(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- JOHN MATHEW,S/O.LATE MATHEW,AGED 50, KARIKAVAYALIL, KADANADU.P.O,KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON MANAYANI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE KADANAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,NO.K.2,KOLLAPPILLY,ANTHINAD.P.O,686651, KOTTAYAM DIST.KERALA STATE REP.BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. SECRETARY TO CO-OPERATION (GENERAL), SECRETARIAT,TRIVANDRUM. 3. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES(GENERAL),COLLECTORATE,KOTTAYAM. 4. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(GENERAL), CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES(GENERAL),MEENACHIL,PALA. 5. STATE OF KERALA,REP.BY SECRETARY TO CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 6. SPECIAL SALE OFFICER,KIDANGOOR SCB GROUP KIDANGOOR. 7. THE GENERAL MANAGER,KOTTAYAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK,KOTTAYAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.K.C. SANTHOSHKUMAR SC FOR BANK SRI. T.A. SHAJI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- W.P.(C).No.23793 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 20th day of August, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner submits that he had availed of two loans from the first respondent Co-operative Bank for Banana and tapioca cultivation. According to the petitioner, he is eligible for the benefit of waiver of the said liability. It is stated that, however the benefit was declined and finally by Ext.P7 order passed by the Joint Registrar the claim for waiver was upheld and the Bank was directed to include the petitioner's liability also and take up the matter before the District Co-operative Bank, the 7th respondent. Petitioner complains that despite Ext.P7, having become final, the first respondent has not done anything so far. It is stated that even Exts.P8 and P9 notices also have not evoke any response. It is in these circumstances the writ petition is filed. WP(c).No.23793/09 2 2. If as stated by the petitioner Ext.P7 order has become final, necessarily the first respondent is bound to take further action on Ext.P7. In view of the complaint that the first respondent has not taken further action in the matter despite Exts.P8 and P9 notices issued on behalf of the petitioner, I direct the first respondent to take further action on Ext.P7 as demanded in Exts.P8 and P9 and do the needful in the matter, within 3 weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WP(c).No.23793/09 3