IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11649 of 2010 MD.MUNNA @ SAHID @ REJKIYA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 21.04.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. Considering the period of custody since 28.7.2008 rejected earlier on the ground of his antecedents of 14 cases let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 75,000/- (Seventy-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri A.K.Sinha, Judicial Magistrate IInd Class, Gaya in Civil Lines PS Case No. 191 of 1999. Both the sureties must be his mother and sister respectively. Their photograph and proof of residence shall be appended to the bail bonds which shall be verified by the court below through the Police before final acceptance. In view of his antecedents of 14 cases this Court further considers it proper to direct that the petitioner shall remain present in Court on every date fixed in the trial. If the petitioner absents on any single date before the court below without sufficient justification, it shall be at liberty not only to deal with him appropriately in accordance with law to expedite the trial and if circumstances so warrant against the sureties also. If the petitioner is involved in any criminal prosecution during pendency of the trial it shall be a clear case of misuse of the privilege of bail. Snkumar/ (Navin Sinha,J.)