IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 4609 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: January 12, 2011 Sanatosh Kumari and others .. Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate for the petitioners. A.N. Jindal, J (Oral) The petitioners have invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the order dated 22.9.2009 passed by the trial court. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners, it transpires that the defendants have placed reliance over the sale deed dated 30.5.1956 executed in their favour to which the plaintiffs deny. As such, the trial court framed the issue with regard to the legality of the said sale deed. The plaintiffs have sought to frame the issue asking the defendants to prove the title of their vendor who had executed the sale deed. Actually, the plaintiffs who had set up the claim have to prove their ownership, impliedly, to prove the illegality of the sale deed. As such, no fault could be found with the issue. Dismissed. January 12, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge