R ^; ^fs^-?^^' ^sBfSS.SSS.!: ^S^^S^f:.^-.. .. ^- ^7C^sy^S^^<''~';Ti^s' Ch r'TTfifiA'BW' AT nn Afiin" PETITIONER WRH'PETITION fSS No. 325 of2008 Smt Lalita Patel Wd/o Late Oajraj Patel, aged about 36 years, Public Hi^ier Seeoiidaiy School, Singhanpur, Dist. Mahasamund(C.O.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Principai Seeretary, Deparfanent of School Education, Mantralaya, •(G'G.) iismic1 Pension Bada, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The District Education Qfiicet', Public iNstt'uctious, Maliasamund, Dist. Mahasamund, (C.O.) 4. The Fulgliar SMkshaa CoBimfttee, throu^-t ('C.G.- WMT PETITION IJNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmjnON IDIA >B: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aairifaotri. J. Present: ShriR-S.PateLAdvocatetbrtfaepetitioner. Shri S.K-Mishra, Paael Lawyer for the State/respondents 1,2 & 3 (Passed on 16 day of Januar}.', 2008) counsel appearing for the petitioner does not want to press this this stage. However. leained counsel seeks pemiission fhat the petitioner be pemuttsd to make a representatioa to tlie authorities concemed to graat beaefit of 5 Pay Comnussioa as per order dated 06.02.2007 passed in W.P. No. 4108/2005, Smf. A. Lai Vs. State ofChhaffisgarh & Others, to which leamed eounsel appearing for 2. It is ordered aecordinglv. 3. In view ofthe above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to tfae State-authorities that in the event a represeatation is made, the same be considered and decided as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge '~—~~~11 .'•vrsi ;l:-:i]-'lw £ S i^