Writ Petition No. 1205 (MS) of 2006 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J Interim Relief Application No. 10832 of 2006 Heard Sri Vinay Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned standing counsel for the State and Sri Sudhir Singh, learned counsel for respondent no. 4. Learned counsel for the parties have submitted the controversy raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 19.06.2006 passed by this court in Writ Petition No. 51 (SS) of 2005 (Munni Upreti Vs. State of Uttaranchal and others) along with other connected writ petitions, consequently, the present writ petition may be decided on the same terms and observations of the aforesaid judgment. In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is finally disposed of in the same terms and observations made in the judgment and order dated 19.06.2006 passed by this court in Writ Petition No. 51 (SS) of 2005 (Munni Upreti Vs. State of Uttaranchal and others) along with other connected writ petitions Writ petition along with interim relief application no. 11192 of 2006 is disposed of accordingly. 31.08.2006 Sd/- S.K.S