IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 26TH MARCH 2009 / 5TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 8905 of 2009(G) ------------------------------- PETITIONERS: ---------------- 1. V.P.SUKUMARI, VALIYAPARAMBIL, NADAKKAVU P.O., ERNAKULAM. 2. MARIAMMA THOMAS, KUMBALAMTHANATHU HOUSE, AYARKUNNAM, KOTTAYAM. BY MR.P.DEEPAK, ADVOCATE. RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER, LEGISLATURE COMPLEX, VIKAS BHAVAN P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM. BY MR.MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, SC, ELE.COMMN. FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.8905 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 26th day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T Grievance in this writ petition is primarily against Ext.P4, a letter issued by the Chief Electoral Officer. 2. Considering this very issue, in the judgment in WP(C) Nos.8383/2009 and connected cases, this Court has held that the said order cannot stand in the way of the authorities in granting or issuing permits consequent to the directions issued by the Tribunal or this Court. 3. In this case also, the permit in question was granted pursuant to the directions of this Court and therefore, it is clarified that Ext.P4 will have no application in taking further action, since it has been already directed in Ext.P1 to settle the timings as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of the judgment, if it was not possible on 16/03/2009. Therefore, it is directed that timings will be settled as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg