1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.F.NO.843 of 2010 AND Pursis St.No.4522/10 in F.A.NO.436 OF 2006 Pushparaj Giriraj Solanki ..vs.. Mr.Hiralal Jangluji Fafanwade and others. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr.R.Sharma Adv. h/f Anand Parchure Adv. for the appellant. Mr.B.B.Raipure Adv. for respondent no.3. Mr.Kalar Adv. for respondent no.4. C ORAM : C.L.Pangarkar, J. DATED : 21st April, 2010. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the respondents. Initially, Advocate Shri Raipure had filed power on behalf of respondent no.3. It appears that later Shams Advocate filed power on behalf of respondent no.3. However, through inadvertance on the Vakalatnama it was shown that he was appearing for respondent no.2. He in fact wanted to appear on behalf of respondent no.3. Besides the application he has also filed pursis stating that he wants to withdraw his power on behalf of respondent no.3. 2 Advocate Shri Shams is allowed to withdraw his power and he stands discharged. Advocate Shri Raipure undertakes to appear on behalf of respondent no.3 since he has already filed power on behalf of respondent no.3. S.O.5/5/2010. JUDGE. chute