IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Bail Application No. 1797/2010 Pankaj Jain Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 5.4.2010 HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr SK Jain - for the petitioner Mr GS Fauzdar – PP Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that FIR has been lodged with a delay of six months. The occurrence took place on a small issue pertaining to education of child and on account of quarrel his wife committed suicide. During course of investigation it has not come out that there was demand of dowry. Hence, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have opposed the bail application. Learned counsel for complainant submits that occurrence took place because of the petitioner thus petitioner may not be enlarged on bail. After considering the rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am of the view that petitioner deserve to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is accepted and it is directed that petitioner namely, Pankaj Jain may be released on bail under Section 439 CrPC in FIR No. 187/2009 registered at Women Police Station – Kota City for offence under Section/s 304(B) and 498-A IPC provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma