Criminal Misc.No.M-19343 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:-20.9.2010 Parmod Singh Rana s/o Mohinder Singh Rana ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr.Rajeev Anand, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Tarun Aggarwal, Senior DAG Haryana. M ehinder S ingh S ullar , J . (Oral) Having exercised his right of regular bail and lost in the Court of Session, petitioner Parmod Singh Rana s/o Mohinder Singh Rana, has directed the present petition for regular bail in a case registered against him alongwith his other co-accused, namely, Santosh Rani, Vanita Sehgal, Manohar Lal Sehgal and State Bank of India through its authorized representative, vide FIR No.92 dated 11.6.2010, on accusation of having committed the offence punishable under sections 201, 420, 467, 471 and 120-B IPC by the police of Police Station Sadar Ambala, invoking the provisions of section 439 Cr.PC. 2. Notice of the petition was issued to the State. 3. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, having gone through the record with their valuable help and after bestowal of thoughts over the entire matter, to my mind, the petitioner is entitled to regular bail in the instant case. 4. As is evident from the record that all the offences alleged against the petitioner are triable by the Court of Magistrate. The petitioner was arrested on 6.2.2010. Since then he is in judicial custody. The charge in this case was framed Criminal Misc.No.M-19343 of 2010 2 on 9.4.2010 and the prosecution did not complete the entire evidence within the period of sixty days from the first date fixed for taking evidence. The petitioner is entitled to regular bail as contemplated under section 437 (6) Cr.PC. There is no previous involvement of the petitioner in any such case. 5. Therefore, taking into consideration the totality of the facts and circumstances, emanating from the record, as discussed here-in-above, to me, the present petition for regular bail deserves to be accepted. 6. In the light of the aforesaid reasons and without commenting further anything on merits, lest it may prejudice the case of either side during the course of the trial of the case, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of trial Court. 7. The instant petition is disposed of accordingly. 20.9.2010 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) AS Judge