S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail Appli. No.4069/2007 (Vijay vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : September 07, 2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Jitender Ojha, for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, P.P. for the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. From perusal of the order impugned, it appears that co- accused, who alleged to have committed theft, furnished an information under section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act stating therein that the stolen jewellery was given to the present petitioner. In the circumstances, therefore, and the question of recovery at the instance of co-accused in furtherance of information furnished by them under section 27 of the Act, in my view it is not a fit case to release the petitioner on bail. The bail application filed by the petitioner under section 438 Cr.P.C. is, therefore, dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-