CF~i'y^^_ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P. (S) No 7^^ /200)S? PETITIONER y/\y ^ ^ss^ ^^^ ...•<^;!'^-y' ^y.>"' ^'"^ ./•'' •<;"-"...-' RESPONDENTS ^Smt. Kanti Pandey, W/o. Shri Rajkumar Pandey, aged about 42 years, Assistant Teacher (Science), Govt. Hr. Sec. School - Kohka Bhilai, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) VERSUS //y «:"• ff '":.-." S^VY^t ^® ''</>.. ''°*:' y. Stateof Chhattisgrh, Through - The Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2< The Director, Pubiic Instruction Department, Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur 3. District Education Officer / Durg, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUI \ Bablu ">. Petitioner ResQonoents Smt. Versus State Chhattis9arh and others SB; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satjsh K. Agnihotri, J Present; Mr. Vipin Tiwari, Advocste for the petitioner h\r. Arv'snd Dubey, Panel lawyer, for -riie res^ (Passed on this 8T" dcy of February, 2007) Learned counse! appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respcndents jointly submit that the facts of the present writ petition are sitnilar to that of in W. P. No. 499 of 200' (Rajeshwa" Rao Kridat ys. 5tate of Chhattisgarh <& others) and W.P. (s) No. 6676/2006 (Ramchhobile Yadav vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others), which were disposed of yide orders dated 9.10.2006 and 6.12.2006. They further submit that the question of lcw involved is also the same. In view of the above-stated submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of in terrr.s of the orders dated 9.10.2006 w,d 6.12.2006 passed by this Court in W. P. No. 499 of 2005 and W.P. (s) No. 6676/2006. No order' as +o costs. Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge