1 W.P.4709.09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4709 OF 2009 Vidya Prasarak Mandal,Goregaon and others ...PETITIONERS. VERSUS The State of Maharashtra, and another ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri Sachin DS.Deshmukh Advocate for Petitioners. Smt.Y.M.Kishirsagar, A.G.P.for Respondent Nos.1&2. Shri D.R.Irale Patil,Advocate for respondent No.3. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 9TH JUNE, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in the light of the communication, the respondent No.3 filed affidavit-in-reply. In para No. 4 of the affidavit, it is contended that the University communicated the decision taken by it 2 W.P.4709.09 to the petitioner, against the representation made by the petitioner. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of that, the petition has become infructous. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructous. Sd/- Sd/- [K.K. TATED, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] MTK