*1* IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3738/2009 Bhagwan Vasantrao Kulkarni. ..Applicant ­VERSUS­ The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent ............... Mr.Ajay A. Joshi, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms.P.P.Shinde, A.P.P., for the Respondent/State. ............... CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. Dated 25th September, 2009. PC:­ 1 By the present application, the Applicant is seeking modification of one of the conditions stipulated in the order dated 09.09.2008 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pandharpur. 2 The present Applicant moved an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Sessions Judge. The Sessions Judge allowed the application and granted anticipatory bail as prayed for subject to certain conditions. Last condition/direction imposed reads thus:­ “If his name is shown by the police as one of the accused after inquiry u/s 156(3) of Cr.P.C. the applicant shall appear before the trial court and shall file regular bail application which the trial magistrate shall decide on merit.” 3 In the submission of the learned counsel for the *2* Applicant, instead of “Trial Court” and “Trial Magistrate”, the same ought to be “appropriate Court”. 4 The learned APP has no objection for carrying out the said modification. 5 In the result, in last paragraph of the order dated 09.09.2008 in places of “Trial Court” and “Trial Magistrate”, the words “appropriate Court” shall be substituted. 6 The Application is allowed and disposed of. ­sd­ (A.P. Deshpande, J)