IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.19365 of 2010 MUKESH KUMAR S/O LATE P.C.RAM, R/O SAHEB COLONY, QUARTER NO.87D, P.S.HARIHARPUR, DISTT-DHANBAD (JHARKHAND)……………………………………………….….PETITIONER Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THRU CHAIRMAN RAILWAY BOARD, GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 2. ZONAL RAILWAY MANAGER, E.C.R. HAJIPUR, BIHAR. 3. DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER, DHANBAD/JHARKHAND. (E.C. RAILWAY) 4. SR. DIVISIONAL ELECTRIC ENGINEER ELECTRIC LOCO SHADE, GOMOH, (E.RAILWAY) 5. DIVISIONAL ELECTRIC ENGINEER, ELECTRIC, LOCO SHADE, GOMOH, (E.C.RAILWAY) 6. ASST. ELECTRIC ENGINEER, ELECTRICT LOCO SHADE, GOMOH……………………………………………………...RESPONDENTS ----------- 02/ 02-Dec-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Railways. In the impugned order dated 05.10.2010 the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna has gone through the relevant facts and has held that the order of transfer is not punitive only because it was passed after revocation of suspension order. The circumstances leading to the transfer order show the administrative exigency and in our view the Tribunal has rightly not interfered with the order of transfer. We find no merit in this writ petition. It is, accordingly, dismissed. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)