IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25053 of 2009 MD.NAYEEM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 15.9.2009 Rahman/ Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Case is under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Later on sections 412, 120B of the Indian Penal Code was also added. As per the prosecution case the house of the petitioner was raided from where cash and some ornaments were recovered. It is said that few ornaments were identified by the ladies of the house of the informant. It is stated in paragraph 17 of the petition that petitioner was made accused in this case after more than five years on the order of the Superintendent of Police, Begusarai, dated 13.3.2009 and petitioner has been arrested on 27.5.2009. It is also stated in paragraph 10 of the petition that against other accused persons Sessions Trial No. 66 of 2004 is going on in which the informant and prosecution witnesses have not identified the accused persons in the court. Petitioner is said to be of 60 years of age and he has no criminal antecedent. Considering the above facts and circumstances and specially the statements of the witnesses examined in the trial, this application is allowed. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Begusarai, in Begusarai Town P.S. case no. 249 of 2003. (J.N.Singh, J) - 2 - M.Rahman