S.B.CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.113/2009 (Onkar Lal vs. Uday Ram) DATE OF ORDER 18/3/2009 HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr.Sandeep Saruparia, for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel. This revision petition is directed against the concurrent findings of two courts below decreeing the money suit of Rs.14141/- in favour of plaintiff-respondent. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that along with the application under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC the defendant had produced a document dated 6/2/1994 allegedly showing repayment of amount in question. The said document filed with the said application under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC has not been believed by the appellate court as having been produced as an after thought and not proved before the trial court. Learned counsel has also read out the cross examination of plaintiff before this court but there appears to be nothing in the cross examination which dislodges the case set up by the plaintiff. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is not inclined to interfere with the concurrent findings of courts below in this revision petition. The revision petition is found to be devoid of merit and same is accordingly dismissed. (DR.VINEET KOTHARI), J. item no.1 baweja/-