IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 9432 of 2008 Between: Smt. Sappa Varalakshmi, W/o. late Vamana Rao, R/o. D.No.38-40-31, Jyothinagar Area, Marripalem, Visakhapatnam. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of A.P. Rep by its Principal Secretry, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Special Officer & Compentent Authority, Urban land Ceiling, Visakhapatnam, 3 The District Collector, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus direct the respondents to allot the land in 331.10 sq.mts in Sy.No.68/2B part, Marripalem Village, Visakhapatnam Urban Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.SRINIVAS DAMMALAPATI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 9432 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents to allot the land admeasuring 331.10 sq. meters in survey no 68/2B (part) , Marripalem village, Visakapatnam to the petitioner. The petitioner herein, who was declared as excess holder of lands to an extent of 313.10 sq meters has submitted an application duly paying the required amount for regularization in terms of the Government orders in G.O. Ms No. 455 and 456 dated 29.7.2002 and on verification of the same, the second respondent submitted proposals to the first respondent recommending the case of the petitioner for regularization in April, 2006 and thereafter since no further action is taken in the matter, the present writ petition is filed. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. Both counsel agreed for disposal of the writ petition at the admission stage. Since the second respondent said to have recommended for regularization of the occupation of the petitioner over the land to an extent of 313.10 sq meters in survey No. 68/2B (part) , Marripalem village, Visakapatnam district and forwarded the application of the petitioner to the first respondent, I deem it appropriate to direct the first respondent to pass appropriate orders on the application of the petitioner by taking into consideration the recommendations made by the second respondent. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________ N.V.RAMANA,J DATE: 28.4.2008 TVK THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 9432 of 2008 Date: 28.4.2008