IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19604 of 2010 1. SAKINA KHATOON, WIFE OF MD. ZAINUL. 2. MD. ZAINUL, SON OF LATE MD. SHAFIQUE. 3. SAIMUL KHATOON, WIFE OF MD. ALAM. ALL ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-RAMNAGAR, P.S. GAIGHAT, DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR. …………………………………………………….PETITIONERS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………………….OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Imteyaz Ahamad, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Shaheen Begum, A.P.P. --------- 2. 16.6.2010. So far as the petitioner no.2, Md. Zainul, is concerned, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he does not want to press this application on behalf of the petitioner no.2 so that he may surrender and seek regular bail. Accordingly, this application against the petitioner no.2 is dismissed as withdrawn. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioners (petitioner nos.1 and 3) apprehend their arrest in a case registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners 2 that admittedly the marriage had been solemnized 8 years back. However, the allegation of demand of dowry, as would be manifest from the First Information Report, appears to have been made only one year back prior to the alleged occurrence, which goes to show the improbability of the story set up in the First Information Report. It has also been submitted that the dead body of the deceased was recovered near pond and that was brought to the house. There is nothing on record to show that these petitioners were involved in the alleged occurrence. Lastly, it is submitted that the petitioner no.1 is the mother-in- law whereas petitioner no.3 is the sister-in-law (gotani) of the deceased and there is no specific allegation against them and this is not a case under Section 304-B of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner no.2, who is father-in-law of the deceased, has already withdrawn his prayer for anticipatory bail to surrender and seek regular bail. Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, namely, (1) Sakina Khatoon and (3) Saimul Khatoon, in the event of their arrest or surrender by them within four weeks, be enlarged on bail on their furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief 3 Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Gaighat P.S. Case No.216/09, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)