IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH OCTOBER 2011 / 20TH ASWINA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 3464 of 2011 ------------------------- CC.138/2009 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT, VARKALA CRIME NO. 640/2008 OF VARKALA POLICE STATION --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ACCUSED ------- ------------------------- 1. NAHAS, S/O.ABDUL RAHIM, RAHIM MANZIL, AYIROOR, VARKALA (VIA), TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT. 2. RAFEEKA BEEVI, W/O.ABDUL RAHIM, RAHIM MANZIL, AYIROOR, VARKALA (VIA), TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT. 3. NAZEER, S/O.ABDUL RAHIM, RAHIM MANZIL, AYIROOR, VARKALA (VIA), TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT. 4. SEEMA, D/O.ABDUL RAHIM, RAHIM MANZIL, AYIROOR, VARKALA (VIA), TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.R.SIVAKUMAR RESPONDENT: -------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VARKALA POLICE STATION THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. SHABNA, D/O.BASHEERA, S.S.MANZIL, MAULAVI JUNCTION, VAKKOM, CHIRAYINKEEZHU (VIA), TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT. PIN-695 308. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,SMT.R.REMA R2 BY ADV. SMT.P.T.RAZEENA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: MM Crl.MC.No. 3464 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE 1 COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.640/08 DATED 25/10/2008 OF VARKALA POLICE STATION ANNEXURE 2 COPY OF THE UNDATED CHARGE SHEET. WITH TRANSLATION ANNEXURE 3 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN O.P.NO.14/2009 DATED 07-09-2009 RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE MM N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J. -------------------------------- Crl.M.C. No.3464 of 2011 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of October 2011 O R D E R Petitioners are the accused in C.C.No.138/2009 of J.F.C.M., Varkala. The offence alleged against them is under Sec.498 A r/w 34 IPC. The 2nd respondent is the de facto complainant therein. She is represented in this Court by her counsel. The learned counsel appearing for both sides submitted that the parties have amicably settled the matter. Annexure-3 is the copy of the judgment of the Family Court, Nedumangad which also shows that the parties have settled the matter. A joint petition has been filed by the de facto complainant and the accused to the effect that the matter has been settled and so Annexure-2 proceeding may be quashed. Since the dispute is purely personal in nature and as the parties have settled the matter, this Crl.M.C. is allowed. Further proceeding in C.C.No.138/2009 of J.F.C.M., Varkala will stand quashed. N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Jvt