C.O.C.P.No.970 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.O.C.P.No.970 of 2009 Date of Decision:-12.8.2009 Surinder Singh ...Petitioner Versus R.K.Jaiswal, SSP Jalandhar ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Mr.Vishal Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): Vide order dated 17.9.2008, the Senior Superintendent of Police, Jalandhar was directed by this Court to investigate the case of FIR No.81 dated 1.5.2007 registered under sections 427 and 304- A IPC Police Station Sadar Jalandhar. Allegations of the petitioner in this contempt petition are that despite the aforesaid direction issued by this Court, no inquiry/investigation was done by the respondent. In response to the show cause notice issued to the respondent, reply dated 8.7.2009 by way of affidavit of R.K.Jaiswal, IPS, SSP, Jalandhar was filed. Alongwith the reply, an inquiry report dated 4.11.2008 Annexure R1 was submitted to say that compliance of the order dated 17.9.2008 has been made. However, a perusal of the aforesaid inquiry report dated 4.11.2008 showed that after the direction issued by this Court, SSP C.O.C.P.No.970 of 2009 2 Jalandhar had not investigated the matter independently and has submitted the aforesaid report on the basis of earlier investigation. Today an additional affidavit has been filed by R.K.Jaiswal, IPS, SSP Jalandhar. Alongwith this affidavit, order (Annexure R1/T) has been filed wherein it has been submitted that a fresh inquiry/investigation has been made by the aforesaid officer in FIR No.81 dated 1.5.2007. Since necessary compliance has been made by the respondent, I am not inclined to proceed further with this petition. The petitioner may challenge the aforesaid findings of the inquiry report (attached as Annexure R1/T with additional affidavit of the respondent) in accordance with law. Rule discharged. (Rakesh Kumar Garg) 12.8.2009 Judge AS