^ ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR /?60 WRIT PETITION No. 72006 PETITIONER ..<• Lakhan Lal Banjare, S/o Shri A.D. Banjare, Aged about 46 years, ,*'• * wiijui^f r\y^u uuuui. «u y^-ui^/ ..••"^LP'"''- ..•• Presently posted at Assistant Grade III, /^o.r<^y''""',..--"'" Janpad Panchayat Office, Bemetara, 'T^. Q;0,^/'' District - Durg (C.G.) ./''^i^J^ Permanent Address R/o Village Karra, ^•""A<''%.'--"'"''' Tahsil Saja, District Durg (C.G.) <' ^' 'r>" RESPONDENTS «t. •^ Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Revenue, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Collector, District Durg (C.G.) / ^^) \ p\^,^1S- The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad *^ ^ . ^\ .<'.^ Panchayat, Bemetara, District Durg (C.G.) ^o^- The Collector, District Dhamtari (C.G.) Tahsildar, Nawagarh, District Durg (C.G.) 1. 2. 3. WRFT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER As mentioned in the cause title above. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS As mentioned in the cause title above. PARTICULARS OF THE ORDER AGAINST WHICH THE PETTTION IS BEING MADE: Being aggrieved by the order dated 2-8-2005 passed by the respondent No. 1, in contravention of the transfer policy of the year 2005, which was applicable up to the period of 31 August 2005. A copy of the order dated 2-8-2005 is being filed as Annexure P/l. SUBJECT MATTER IN BRIEF: narreted in para No. 5.1 ofthis petition. ^ 1^1 HSCH CQURT OF JUDiCATURE CHKATTiSGARH :BSLASPUR S.B.: Hon'Me Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Writ Petition No. 1388 ofSQQ^ petitioner Ress'ondents Lskhan Lal Banjare Vsrsus Slate of Chhattisgarh and others Present: Shri S. C. Verma, counsel for the pelifioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt. Advocste for the respondsRfcs/State ,'Stete. ORDER (Passed on 23"' day of February, 2007) The peiiiioner, whiie working aS Assissant Grade-ili at Janpad Panchayat Office, Bemetara, District Durg, was fran^erred to Block Janpad Panchayat, Bemeteira on administratwe ground vide ordsr dated 2.3.2005 03/1). Thsrsafter, nsw order dated 7.7.2006 (P/A-1) u"®passed. Learned counsel appearing for petitioner submits that Uie petitioner does ncrt want to chaltenge de order clated 2.8.2005 (P/1). He further submite that the respondents be directed to permit the peiitioner to join the new piaee or po^ing as per order dated 7.7.2006 (P/A-1), to which teamed counsel appsaring fcr tfi®rsspondeRts/Stets has RO objsction. !t is ordered accordiRgfy. The Writ petitton is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. The respondents/State shaH take steps to give effect to me order ctated 7.7.2006 (P/A-D. Noorder as to COSIS. B2B." Sd/- SatishK.Agn^n Judge »»- -a rmr ri, ii 111 , • 'i •^ ^ U-~T^S^'