IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.5907 of 2011 Date of decision : 1.4.2011 Kamal Saini ....Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Ms.Sharmila Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner is that he is working as a contractual employee but is not being permitted to mark his attendance in the attendance register by the respondent-department even though no order to that effect has been passed. The appointment of the petitioner was for a period of six months or till a regular appointee or incumbent selected by the department. The services of the petitioner are temporary and likely to be terminated at any time and the arrangement was for a period of six months or till a regular appointee is selected by the government. The grievance of the petitioner would be justified if his services are replaced by any other contractual employees instead of regular appointment. At the moment no such apprehension is visible. C.W.P.No.5907 of 2011 -2- Therefore, no interference is warranted at this stage. Dismissed. 1.4.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss