IN_THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR W.P.NO. ;Zc^ /200^ PETITIONER Jeet Singh Kshatriya, aged about 51 years, son of Shri Daa.ni .Singh, resident of Purani Basti Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS .s^ J^ i^€^f' ^:^:'^' l-s^T^I \t. '3:'>-. 'f 1. Union of India through: Secretary, Departinent of Industries, New Delhi 2. Cement Corporation of India, through : Its Chairman, Core 5%$o^e<fcomplex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi. 3. Cement Corporation of India, Akaltara Branch, through : Its General Manager, Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (Chhattisgarh). / ' / :;^:.^a.^l;SAiia.";: WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 sn^i^r !<-ii4i 3ng?i W:lN?T!f?g + 'f^^, "s^ 't-iww^, 's^re7i3, 'radray tiwpir %i(ra»...l.O.P-NO. ^6*1/ ^^ 290 Shri T.K. Tnvari, co Shri V.V.S. Murthy, for Union of India/responi AppUcation for ur^ Heanl. :eilit Leamed couiisel foij the petitioner subinits that fhe petitioner has not been considered ft>r proinotion to fhe post ofAccotUitant. He subniits that the petitione before respondent no.2, ftirfher submits that for opportuiuty offiting fhe d| aufhority/respondent no. nierits in accordaace wifhl Haviiig considered inerits offhe case, in fhe ser\?ed if a direction is representation raisiag aufhoritv'/i^spondent no. ^iWicl-ll-t -V^t ^ ft^t <fa^l< ^ai^nan^r |insel for the petitioner. fi* 'Additioaal Central Govt. Staading Counsel lent no. 1 on advaace copy. heariiig is aflowed. |r has already submitted a representation but it has not been decided so far. He jtie present fhe petitioner inay be given an •tailed representation before tbe coinpetent [2, which shaU be considered on its owa llaw. ^ad -svifhout expressiag any opuiion on fhe [^piaioD. of fhis Court, ends ofjustice wSl be ^iven to the petitioner to inake a detaited |his grievances before the coinpetent along with a copy of the petitiou and this [T^^g^ XI-HC-22 an^iqn f?:W?3I1^T snllti TII^tI ggSstSSSiiif' ^•5^ ^qraRTq, a'dl'y'ld, Wtl'My W(R'ir%i)fsti ^^tT' order, withia a inonth, antj conipetent auftiority/respo' own inerits ia accordance is inade clear that if any gi With fhe aforesaid 6b of. +i'ftd41-) iffwif ^ tsrS ifa+iK '^aiNiian^i on such representation being filed, the dent no. 2 shaU decide the same on its [with law as early as possible prefeiably wifhin fhree inonths froin fS^e date of receipt of tlie representation. It |ievaace stiU subsists, fhe petitioner in.ay avail fhe reinedv avaUable utider fhe laiv. servations, tiiis petition stauds disposed Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge >1 II