IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR C<^. l^ ( MISC.APPEAL fcl N0. 4^ /2009 vs RESPONDENTS: (Claimants) > APPELLANT: Pramod Kumar Tiwari, son of Shri (Non-applicant No.2) Supedram Tiwari, aged __ years, (Registered owner resident of Village Kurda, Tahsit Champa, Oistrict Janjgir-Champa. <^ 1. Smt. Santoshi Bai, widow of Late Ratan bas Mahant, aged ^.^" ^ 2. Deepak Kumar, son of Late ••-"" •.^\ -'•yvT v.A©«?**a ^' ^"..//•^'^^' ' Ratan bas Mahant' a9ed 15 years. (^ 3. Kumari Jyoti, daughter of S Late Ratan Das Mahant, aged 13 years. 4. Sandeep, son of Late Ratan c? Das Mahant, aged 11 years. ^_5. Sanjay Kumar, sonof Late ^ Ratan Das Mahant, aged 9 years. No.2 to 5 are minors through their natural guardian mother- Smt. Santoshi Bai, widow of Late Ratan Das Mahant. Al! are residents of Village Barpali Champa, Tahsil <& P.S. Champa, bistrict Janjgir-Champa. 6. Sunder Singh Sidar, aged /' <%^1 ?sslon_-applicant No.l •s Non-applicant No.3 Non-applicant No.4 N o n - a|3pli c ant No.5 '^^1 Jagdalla <& P.S. Janjgir- 9 about 33 years, son of Meghnath Sidar (wrongly mentioned as Beghnath in the impugned award), resident of (Champa), Tahsil Champa, bistrict Champa. 7. Fatte Ram Kumbhkar, aged about 38 years, son of Ramcharan, resident of Jagdalla (Champa), Tahsil & P.S. Champa, bistrict Janjgir-Champa. (at the time of accident possessor of vehicle) 8. Ganapati Rao, son of M. Appa Rao, resident of Shankar Nagar, Champa, District Janjgir-Champa. (owner of vehicle) r. Branch Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Extension Branch Champa, bistrict Janjgir-Champa. MISCELLEANOUS APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT. 1988 ^ ^^ . 5:w: , , , OF S.M. Quddusi & G. JJ<. HG. 104 GF ±. llSoii-applicatit No.2] -. Pi^mod KLuuai-Tiwaji ¥^^SiIS Suil. Saiito^hi Bai aiid ouiers. ..--•' Shri Malay Shrivastava, counsel wlth the appellaiit. Shri R.S. Patel, counsel for respondents No. 1 •to 5. oa 29fch -2G11| si, J. Leamed counsel for the appeUaiit siibiuits that as per iustructk)ns received from. local counsel, fhe appellaiit is uo tnore, 2. Leamed counsel for lespondciits No« 1 to 5 suuiu.its tuat .de uiere was coiuproiD.ise arnveu. ax Derweeii 'uie paTiies OUISK the Court aiid a.s a result of coiu.proiLiise, the aiiiouiit of .com.pensatk^ii has already beeu paid. 3, The feict is uot disputed by learued counsel for tlie appellant. 4. In vltw of t3ie above, the appeal stauds abated aud Is disuiissed accordio-gly. Sd/- I.M.Quddusi Judge Sd/- G. Minhajuddin Judge