• In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. CRM.M-16566 of 2009 Decided on July 15,2009. Hem Ram Khatana,Advocate -- Petitioner vs. State of Haryana --Respondent. Present: Mr.R.M Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr.Partap Singh,Sr.DAG, Haryana. Rakesh Kumar Jain, J: (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter-alia, contends that the petitioner had only identified the vendor, though, there is no allegation that he is beneficiary out of the said sale consideration. He further submits that as of now, the land in question which is alleged to have been sold by way of impersonation has been mutated in the name of the real owner by way of mutation No.35004 dated 16.9.2003. He further submits that pursuant to the order dated 15.6.2009, the petitioner has joined the investigation. This fact is admitted by learned State Counsel on instructions from Sh.Krishan Murari, D.S.P. In view of the above, the order dated 15.6.2009 is made absolute. The petitioner shall keep on joining the investigation as and when called and shall abide by the provisions of Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. The petition is disposed of. July 15,2009 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge