I.... - / :^^- ^ ^ ^ IN THE HIGH^QURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO. 175^ /2004 ^ PETITIONER: MinorVivek KumarTiwari S/0 Shri Dr. Govind Prasad Tiwari /Aged about 17 Years,Through His father Shri Dr. Govind Prasad Tiwari ^ R/0 F-12 Civil-Lines,Darogapara / .•<.,.. Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh [C.G.I / ^/..^'^ ^^ - RESPONDBNTS: VERSUS [1] State of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Deptt. Of Education DKS Bhawan Raipur. [C.G.] ^X.T' ^•'iy'^\' ^^y' ^ ^' ^0' <-'^v <'^/> ^' :^<^;r/- y^" [2] Board of Secondary Education ,Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Pension Bada, Raipur , [C.G.] s^/: WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE 0^ WRIT IN THE NA^imE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI ETC ORANY OTHER DIRECTI^tS O^ ORDERTO DOLJUSTICE IN THE MATTER. XI-HC-22 3TT^TF^T f^ira^Tl^T ^RW^rfw ^J 3^'^TPTT^T, i?ift?PT^/f^TRTy 3TT^T^^ NINdlshNI«h•-••----•-'•--^ 200 3:n^TBMraiK^rfN' 18.7.2005 ShriRajesh Pandey, <| Shri Sandeep Dubey, Shri Paakaj Agarwal, The answerJSBiTsheetsl to the father of the petiti^ satisfied with the evall irregularity or infirniity in| ^N^T^ WToTf ^ teT^t-(f^f^K ^)^Tf^T3n^1 'ounsel for the petitioner. Govt, Adv. for respondent No.l, counsel for respondent No.2. of the petitioner have been showp >ner today in the Court and he is iiation. As such, there is no the evaluation and the petition of the petitioner is liable ^o be dismissed, therefore, it is disniissed, Counsel for the petiljioner has paid Rs.1,000/- to Shri Pankaj Agarwal, who is re(j[uired to deposit the same with the [ation and receipt of the same be Secretary, Board of Educ subniitted within a period bf two weeks. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge (^^f^r)