IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION {C} NO.....46/200 /Umakant' Jaiswal, S/o Shri Mudrika Pd. Jaiswal, Aged about 52 years, R/o Utarda, Distt.— Korba, C.G. PETITIONER VERSUS V .1 Regional Transport Authority, Chhattisgarh at Raipur. UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE WRIT PETITION 2 Secretary Regional gyTransport Auti’lority, Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur. /' CONSTITUTION OF INDIA r y XI—HC—78 3EianamRL€§%ang,§RmHgI mm w.e(£.c.).9£$>.[.ri2. In 200 mm (W) WWW WWW EamKH%aa&w WW§WW éswm 1 9.1 .2007: Shri Anshu} Shrivastava coun Shri Parag Koteoha PL for the The petitioner has preferre respondent No.1 be directed to cons of regular permit for the route Kuh’ to and retum tripr The petitioner made the abr 23‘ 1 1 .2006 but the respondent No.1 Prayer made by the [earned No.1 may be directed to consider th with taw, to which learned oouneei fo Having heard learned courts facts and circumstances of the case application of the petitioner regardin in accordance with law within a peric copy of this order, With the direction aforesaid ti Certified copy as per rules. sei for the petitioner. : respondent/State. 2d this writ petition with a prayer that der the application of the petitioner for grant Katghora via Saraipali: Hardibazar, Chaitma )ve application before respondent No.1 on is not deciding the same. counsel for the petitioner is that respondent e application of the petitioner in accordance ' the State has no objection. ei for the parties and having regard to the respondent No.1 is directed to consider the 3 grant of regular permit on the above route d of three months from the date of receipt of ie petition is disposed of. W, 3d]— Dh‘ueodra Mishra Judge P.T.O.