THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY Crl.P.No.2641 of 2007 Date of Order: 20-08-2010 Between: M.Sadanand ..Petitioner and 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh through SHO., PS Kothur, Mahabubnagr District and another ..Respondents The Court made the following Order: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY Crl.P.No.2641 of 2007 Oral order: Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is to quash the proceedings against the petitioner (A-18) in C.C.No.506 of 2006 pending on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate, Shadnagar, Mahabubnagar District, wherein the petitioner was charged for the offence under Sections 419, 420, 468 read with 109 IPC. The petitioner herein is a Sub-Registrar of Shadnagar at the relevant point of time and the only allegation against him is that at the time of assigning the document numbers he expressed doubt about the person who is impersonating as B.Satyanarayana ex-serviceman by seeing his physical status. At that time A1—J.Venugopal, A4—B.Venkateshwar Rao, A-14— B.Laxmaiah @ Golla Laxmaiah, A-15—J.Sudershan Goud, A1—16 Bhavani Venu, Andhra Jyothi Reporter of Kothur and A-17—Girimoni Hanmanthu, document writer convinced the Sub- Registrar that the person available and who signed the documents as genuine B.Satyanarayana and made the Sub-Registrar to register the document. Had he insisted for link documents, such as title deeds and Pahani copies, he would have come to the conclusion that impersonating person as Satyanarayana is not a genuine person, since his name was written as Boggula Sathya Nararayana, but the petitioner failed to do so and abetted the crime. Except the said averment, there is no allegation against the petitioner that he connived with the other accused in registering the document by impersonating B.Satyanarayana. The cases on hand do not fall under Section 107 IPC. The petitioner has not engaged any person to do a thing in any conspiracy or illegal omission takes place in pursuance of the conspiracy to attract the ingredients of abetment. Further, proceedings against A1, who is mainly responsible for all the mischief, are quashed by this Court in Crl.P.No.4751 of 2007 and proceedings against A3 are also quashed in Crl.P.No.4194 of 2008, dated 24-09-2008. Further, A10 died and CC is abated against four persons. In view of the same, continuance of the proceedings against the petitioner is nothing but abuse of process and the same are liable to be quashed. Criminal Petition is accordingly allowed and the proceedings against the petitioner (A18) in C.C.No.506 of 2006 pending on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate, Shadnagar, Mahabubnagar District are hereby quashed. _________________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J. 20-08-2010 Murthy