Civil Revision No. 1658 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 1658 of 2010 Date of Decision: 1.10.2010 Prateek Gupta …Petitioner Versus Ramesh Chowdhary and Others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.K. Kukreja, Advocate for respondent No.1. Respondents No.2 to 4 ex parte. Mr. N.S. Dandiwal, Advocate for respondent No.5. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner Prateek Gupta, during the pendency of the eviction petition, filed by Ramesh Chowdhary, Naresh Chowdhary, Suresh Chowdhary and Parveen Chowdhary, against M/s V.S. Iron and Steel Sales Corporation, had purchased 1/6th share of Parveen Chowdhary in Shop- cum-Office No. 216, sector 29-D, Chandigarh, which is the demised property, from where the tenant/respondent No.5 is sought to be evicted. An application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC for impleading the petitioner as a party was dismissed by the Rent Controller, Chandigarh, Civil Revision No. 1658 of 2010 2 vide his order dated 7.12.2009, by observing that the transferee pendente lite without leave of the Court is neither a necessary nor a proper party and impleadment would not avoid multiplicity of the litigation. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the rights of the petitioner to get the tenant evicted will be jeopardized, therefore, he is a necessary party. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that the petitioner, in his own right, can file an ejectment petition to vacate the tenant and in case such a petition shall be filed, the same shall be tried along with Rent Petition No. 70 dated 21.7.1998. With the observations made above, the present revision petition is disposed of. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge October 1, 2010 “DK”