pvr 1 wp2634-10 IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2634 OF 2010 Aslam Suleman Qureshi. ...Petitioner vs. 1.Anahita Rusi Mehta & others. ...Respondents --- Mr.Ramesh Dube Patil i/b. Ajay Misar & Co., for Petitioner. Mr.Kevic Setalwad i/b. Mulla & Mulla & CB&C, for Respondent nos.1 & 2. Mr.Bharat Mehta, AGP for Respondent no.3. Ms.Priti Purandare, for Respondent no.4. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & K.K.TATED, JJ. DATED: 31st January, 2011 P.C.: 1. The petitioner admittedly does not claim any interest in the property which is being redeveloped. His grievance is that the construction which is being carried on near his property under the sanctioned building plan is pvr 2 wp2634-10 contrary to law. If because of the construction which is going on, any right of the petitioner is violated, it is for the petitioner to agitate that grievance. He cannot approach the Administrator General in relation to the property in which he has no interest. The petition is, therefore, rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J.) (K.K.TATED,J.)