IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1254 of 2008 DINESH PODDAR Versus HARI CHARAN SAH @ HARISH CHANDRA SAH ----------- 2 01.10.2008 No one appears for the petitioner. Mr. S.K. Verma is present on behalf of the opposite party. The amendment sought in the written statement by the defendant-petitioner in the Court below in course argument by way of rebuttal of Ext. 9, a decree dated 29.8.1989, was definitely not only belated but malafide. That being so, this Court would not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly, this Civil Revision application is dismissed. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)