IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.6858 of 2009 Date of decision: May 6, 2009. Neena Sandhu ...Petitioner(s) v. State of Punjab & Anr. ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri S.S. Salar, Advocate for the petitioner. ORDER Surya Kant, J. - (Oral): This order shall dispose of CWP Nos.6858, 6898 and 6900 of 2009 as common questions of law and facts are involved in these cases. For brevity, the facts are being taken from CWP No.6858 of 2009. The petitioner seeks a direction to the Improvement Trust, Amritsar to execute the sale deed, deliver possession and complete all other formalities to enable her to occupy and use plot No.E/906 situate in Ajnala Road Area Expansion Scheme at Amritsar. Alternatively, the petitioner seeks allotment of some other plot. The petitioner's case is that her land measuring 16 marla situate within the revenue estate of village Gumtala was acquired by the Improvement Trust, Amritsar for the execution of Ajnala Road Area Expansion Scheme and in terms of the rules framed by the Improve Trust, the petitioner was entitled to allotment of a plot being a locally displaced person. It is the petitioner's case that after a long correspondence of 12 years, that plot No.E/906 measuring 200 sq. yards was allotted to her by the Trust vide its resolution dated 20.5.1992. Thereafter, a show cause notice was served upon the petitioner on 2.4.1996 for cancellation of the allotment to which the petitioner submitted her reply dated 22.4.1996. The Trust found substance in the petitioner's reply and recommended to the State Government to approve the allotment in her favour. Thereafter, no decision whatsoever regarding cancellation of the allotment has taken place and/or conveyed to the petitioner. The petitioner further relies upon the clarification issued by the State Government on 19.5.2006 as well as a decision of this Court dated 23.7.2008 rendered in CWP No.940 of 2007 in the case of a similarly situated allottee. Howsoever, the petitioner's grievance is that despite repeated representations sent by her including dated 1.9.2006 and 24.10.2006 (Annexures P-8 and P-9), no final decision in the matter has been taken so far. Having heard Learned Counsel for the Petitioner at some length and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, however, without expressing any views on merits thereof at this stage, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the Improvement Trust, Amritsar to consider and dispose of the petitioner's pending claim regarding allotment of plot No.E/906 and/or any other alternative plot. A final decision in this regard shall be taken within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. In the event of acceptance of the petitioner's claim, consequential formalities including execution of a conveyance deed, if so required, shall also be completed within two months thereafter. Dasti. May 6, 2009. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge