1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 228 OF 2011 IN C.A. 7564 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1324 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8465 OF 2011 IN LPA 228 OF 2011 (Ratanlal Damu Patil and ors. VS Gopal Ganesh Patil and ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. P.R. Patil, Advocate h/f. Mr. A.K. Tiwari, Advocate for the Appellants/Applicants Mr. R.R. Mantri, Advocate for the respondents ... CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 25.07.2011 P.C.:­ 1. The Appeal is directed against the order passed by the learned Single Judge refusing to vacate the ad­interim relief granted to the respondents. The Writ Petition is yet to be admitted and the Court has still to decide whether the ad­ interim relief granted should be confirmed. 2. In our opinion, there is no need to entertain the Appeal in view of the statement made by Mr. Mantri, appearing for the respondents that the respondents will not act on the ad­interim order passed in terms of prayer clause (D) of the Petition till the Writ Petition is heard on 29th July, 2011. 2 3. We accept the statement of Mr. Mantri and reject the Appeal. Consequently, Civil Application no.8465 of 2011 seeking stay also stands dismissed. Sd/­ Sd/­ arp [M.T. JOSHI, J. ] [SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.]