•f'" •v^viievi'^-w, IN THE HIGHCOURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT SinoSa S.e, MISCELLANEOUS APPEALNO.u OF 2008 AP^ELLANT vte%-;^ ^^^y^< -^- .^n^-' ^^y^" RESPONDENTS ^^ ^^ Narayan Singh S/o Bodhan Singh Sengar, aged about 58 years, Caste-Kshatriya, Occupation Agriculturist, R/o Village-Latiya, Tahsil Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) i , (Defendant N o.1) ^ VERSUS Madan Singh Dahariya S/o Harprasad, aged about 60 years, Caste-Satnami (Ex- M.L.A.), Occupation Agriculturist, R/o Village- Amartal, Tahsil Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) (Plaintiff) State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Collector, Janjgir, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) (Defendant No.2) MEMO OF APPEALUNDER ORDER43 RULE 1 ful OF THE CODE OFCIVIL PROCEDURE. 1908 r.1 fimw a»*(i<t» 3^ -^WWi, yfll'M'liD, T°«11'9y ^^.,.^^Mfi.L..l^^ 200— an^T TPW ('i?^*"^) ^«tWv^s ^n^o <ftT<<fcl<<tn 'TPT^f ^ 'fy^' <f^l<$f< ^T 3?RW SD^T S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice Praslhant Kumar Mistffia 1&.11.2010. No.2. sentation CTI behatf of the None forthe appeilant. Shri Neeraj Choubey, c<x4isei for respondent No. 1. Shri Sanjwv Agrawat, Pafiel Lawyer for the StatWr^ponctent The mertier was p^^ over onee in absence of any pp^Sant. No one appears for the artpetlant even in the se<»ridcatl. tn the cireumstances, th^re is no (rther option teft with the Court bul to dismiss the m(sceiianeous af^eat for want prreecutiw. The appeal is dismteed f(?r want of prosecutton. Sd//- prashantKumarMtebra Judge "•••v-