AB 2584/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P K MUSAHARY Heard Mr. A.Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Z.Kamar, lear ned Public Prosecutor, Assam. The accused petitioner No.1 is the husband of the informant and he is working as lecturer in Assamese Department at Madhab Choudhury College, Barp eta while accused petitioner No.2 is the brother of accused petitioner No.1, who is also a married person with three children. Both the brothers live in a joint family maintaining a common mess.As regards accused petitioner No.2,Sri Naren Pathak, I find no materials against him and accordingly it is directed that in t he event of his arrest in connection with Sorbhog P.S.Case No.187 of 2011 u/s 4 98(A)/34 IPC he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.15,000/- to the satisfaction of the arresting authority with condition that he shall ap pear before the I.O. concerned for recording his statement within 10(ten) days from today. So far the accused petitioner No.1, Sri Manjit Pathak is concerned there are some materials against him regarding demand of dowry and related torture on the informant. A statement has been made at the bar by the learned counsel for the pet itioner that the accused is desirous to bring the informant from her paternal ho use and would live with her peacefully. In view of the above, it is directed that the accused petitioner No.1, Sri Manjit Pathak shall bring the informant from his in-law’s house honourably as soon as possible preferably within 30 days from today and both the accused husband and informant wife shall report before the IO once in a fortnight for a period of six months. With the above directions, this AB stands disposed of.