IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. RSA. No.: 318 of 2001. Decided on: 27.12 .2011. ______________________________________________ 1(a) Shri Dev Kumar Dhiman son of late Shri Joinder Singh, Village Khad, Tehsil and District Una, Himachal Pradesh. 2(b) Smt. Prabha Kumari wife of late Shri Joinder Singh, village Khad, Tehsil and District Una, Himachal Pradesh. 3(a) Smt. Nisha Dhiman, wife of Shri Surinder Singh care of Shri Surinder Singh, General Manager (Marketing) HMT, Pinjour (Haryana). … Appellants. Versus 1. Shri Vishal Sharma son of Shri Ram Dass Sharma, Advocate, District Court, Una, Tehsil and District Una, (HP)-174 303. 2. Shri Ram Dass Sharma son of late Shri Durga Dass, Advocate, District court, Una, Tehsil and District Una, Himachal Pradesh – 174 303. 3. Smt. Sharda Devi wife of Shri Joinder Kumar, resident of village Didhera, Tehsil and District Una, (Himachal Pradesh). … Respondents. 4. Shri Yudhishter Kahol, son } 5. Shri Rajinder Kahol, son } of late Shri Faquir 6. Smt. Leelawati Kahol, widow } Chand. 7. Smt. Vijay Kumari, daughter } All residents of Amb Road, village and Post Office Una, Tehsil and District Una (HP) – 174 303. 8. Shri Joinder Pal son of Shri Amrit Lal. 9. ……….. Deleted……….. 10. Shri Mohan Lal alias Madan Lal, son of Shri Salig Ram. 11. Smt. Sudesh Kumari wife of Shri Ram Lok. 12. Shri Ram Lok son of Shri Prabha. 13. Shri Kirshan Dev son of Shri Relu Ram. 14. Shri Rajinder Singh son of Shri Nasib Singh. All residents of village and Post Office Una, near Marketing Society (Sabji Mandi), Tehsil and District Una, Himachal Pradesh. Proforma Respondents. - 2 - Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree passed by learned District Judge, Una in Civil Appeal No.39/94, dated 17th April, 2001. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Appellants : Mr. Bhupender Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Advocate for the appellants. For the Respondents : Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.4. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral). It is represented by the learned counsel for the appellants that there is no surviving cause of action in the suit in favour of plaintiffs. Consequently, the suit filed by the plaintiffs is dismissed. The judgments and decrees passed by both the courts below are set aside. The appeal stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 27, 2011. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.