IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23158 of 2011 Chandan Pathak Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03. 24.10.2011 Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case initially lodged under section 379 IPC. Two days thereafter section 411 was added. It appears that the stolen truck and the laden milk powder packets were found in the premise/factory belonging to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that aforesaid premise/factory was handed over for its management to one Pappu Turi under agreement. The agreement appears to have been entered into between Papu Turi and petitioner along with Sunil Kr. Singh and Ajay Kr. Singh on 27.8.2010. It appears that one of the party to the agreement is another co- accused. This Court, for grant of anticipator bail, does not feel it appropriate to rely on the said documents. The application is dismissed. If the petitioner appears and pray for bail in the court below, the same shall be considered on its own merit unprejudiced by the present order. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )