IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 155 OF 2007 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 100 OF 2006 SHRI. NILCONTA G. AMONKAR THROUGH ....Applicant ATTORNEY GAJANAN NILCONTA AMONKAR Versus RAMESH M. BANDODKAR AND 7 ORS. ....Respondent Mr. V. Rodrigues, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. J. A. Lobo for the Respondents. Coram:- S.K. SHAH, J. Date:- 2nd March, 2007 P.C.: All the three applications are made to correct a clerical mistake that has occurred in the Order dated 8th February, 2007. That mistake is appearing in the second last sentence of para 3 of the Order, where instead of 'plaintiffs', it should be read as 'defendants'. Necessary correction shall be made accordingly and that sentence should be read as under :- " The claim of the defendants (instead of plaintiffs) that they have a right of way through the said suit land which is in front of the plaintiffs' house, that claim was made on the basis of the allegation that it was a public road." The correction should be made to the extent of placing "defendants" instead of 'plaintiffs' as indicated above. Misc. Civil Application stands disposed of accordingly. S.K. SHAH, J. sl.