IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH : HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH (29TH) DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN Present: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY Civil Revision Petition No.3021 of 2008 Between: Dr. Kathuri Prakash … Petitioner And: Kathuri Surekha & others … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY Civil Revision Petition No.3021 of 2008 ORDER: This revision petition is directed against the docket order dated 30.10.2007 in OS No.7 of 1998 on the file of the District Judge, Adilabad, wherein, the memo filed by the petitioner-plaintiff seeking return of the final decree, was rejected on the ground that it is a permanent Court record, it cannot be given to the plaintiff. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner-plaintiff. None appears for the respondents. Perused the record. 3. The plaintiff filed suit for partition and preliminary decree was passed on 20.06.2002. Subsequently, final decree was also passed in the matter on 13.02.2004. It is stated that the final decree was engrossed on the stamp papers. The petitioner-plaintiff filed a memo for handing over of the final decree. The said memo was returned on the ground that it cannot be returned as it is permanent Court record. As the final decree was engrossed on the required stamp papers, though the same serves as a document of title but being a permanent record, certified copy of the same can be furnished to the parties on application and under proper acknowledgment. 4 . In the result, the civil revision petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. __________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J Date: 29.07.2011 bss