IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM FRIDAY, THE 4TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 13TH KARTHIKA 1933 RP.No. 728 of 2011(E) -------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.32041/2010 Dated 22/03/2011 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -------------------------------------------- 1. THOMAS GEORGE, MODIYIL HOUSE, KUMBANAD.P.O, KUMBANAD-689N547 2. JESSY THOMAS, W/O.THOMAS GEORGE, -DO- BY ADVS. SMT.INDU SUSAN JACOB SRI.EBY AUGUSTINE RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS --------------------------------------- 1. THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD., REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, REGISTERED OFFICE, SIB HOUSE, T.B. ROAD, P.B.NO.28, THRISSUR -680 001. 2. THE CHIEF MANAGER/AUTHORISED OFFICER, SOUTH INDIAN BANK REGIONAL OFFICE, PATHANAMTHITTA. 3. THE BRANCH MANAGER, SOUTH INDIAN BANK, BRANCH, THIRUVALLA, P.B NO. 27, NEAR S.C.S JUNCTION THIRUVALLA - 689 101. BY ADV. SRI. GEORGE VARGHESE, SC., S.I.B. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: svs C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J. ---------------------------------------------- Review Petition No.728 of 2011 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of November, 2011 O R D E R --------------- Before signing the order dismissing the review petition the new counsel engaged by the petitioner appeared and submitted certain facts. On that basis the order disposing the review petition is recalled and the review petition is restored to files. 2. In the review petition, an interim application is filed as I.A.No.680/2011 seeking permission to withdraw the review petition without prejudice to his rights to institute a fresh writ petition. I do not find any reason to permit the petitioner to institute any fresh writ petition. However, learned counsel for petitioner submitted that there were certain facts which could not be brought to the notice of this court when the writ petition was filed and those facts on merits if agitated before the appropriate authority will grant sufficient relief to the petitioner. 3. Considering all the above aspects permission is granted to withdraw the Review Petition and the Review RP.728/11 2 Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, I make it clear that observation contained in the judgment of the writ petition dt.22.3.2011, will not stand in the way of the petitioner seeking statutory remedy as provided under Section 17(1) of the SARFAESI Act, if sustainable under law. C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE. okb