MIIJM (_-UUKi O?" GhtBiAt § l^sQAKH Al E^!LA5sPuK UB: non'Dle Shn uhirendra iWisnra & Hon'b'e Shri R.N. Chandrakar. JJ ""'•iiADDeai No. 281/2010 ApDei'ant KeSDOHQSHTS /\nll Kumsr l3untfl. S/o. Shrf Prayag Ram Gupta, agsd about ju years; uccupaiion — becreiary Grsir1 Psnch^vst Puhni;tr3.' J^npaci pQHcijoiyctl Lcikiioripur, Distnct Surguja C.G. (Psftioner) Vs. State or unnattisgarn, thS Secretary, <a- s- Lai<nanpur, Exscutive i.hrougii fcancrtavaf anei oociai Wveuar^ DsGsr^r^snt. Dsu Ks v.^n SnQh BuSWSin i\«ipur(Q.G.) tne Coiiector. .<^i ,mi i.i-'s Hi^nr^ Qtirrsiii'a (^ C^ \ •--rUs ^i^Jl.iit, i^'i-J'i.t S^- -.^•t-iS^iLdJS^ ^-•—I'.'u*.^' Tne Depuiy Coiiector Suiyuja Incharas V'deo Oufif^tSsti'LTii'iy, L/(i>fcfik*l OUit.jUica C.G. The Food Offlcer. Ambitapur, r^'^i...:^!. r<-.^—..:— /^ /^ L^"5LIiUl OLSEyUJiS \.r.\^. janpaa r-ancnayai through the Chief OfSicer, janpad Panchayat Lakhanpur, District Surguja C.G. Mukdeo Singh S.'o. Ramdhan slRgh, aged about 50 years, Up Sarpanch Giam Fanchayai Amera, Janpad PaF>chavat L£(r<i'i«aHpUi,USSi.iiCl OUiyUj<3 0.iL?. (ResDondents invwii petttion) n h®MSMn_ot ^D^! yna®F§8cil9".2l1.lofins Cnha"isgarri nigh Court iAppeal to DMslon Bench'i Act. 2006.) neStit'it; Sliii riaKestl r-anuey, COUnSel I'OI' tiie appeiianl. 6. OKAL ORDtR (20.08.2010) c-0itector, Surauia, vlde hls memo dated 8 August, 2008, directed the District Food Officer and Ch'et txecutive Ofticer, janpad Pancnayat, LaKnanpur to iodae crtmina! complaint pn the basis of report dated 12.03.2007 of the un.eT '.»>.. *^ ^.x^y v% hxecutive Uti'icer, sn wnfcn ne touna shortag®QT y drums Goniaining ibuu liters ot Kerosene !n the stocK oi Gram Panch.ayat Amera. He further compiained biack marketing ot th.e kerosene which was found short. 2. Tne petitioner chalienaed the above direction ofthe Coliector by filino vVrit Petiron No.4a5s.'200B on tne arouncl that atoresaid dlrection nas been issued on the report of Chiet' Executn/e Officer, who conducted preiiminary enquiry behind his back and wnhout affording any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitlon has been disposed of by impugned order wit" an obseryation that "./ oo noi find any irreguiarity in directing Invesagation by the poilce for missmg oi 9 drums coniainina listM iiters ot kerosene oii m Gram fanc-navas. wnera. However, it is maae dear that the police autfiorities siiail not 6e innuenoed by me preiimlnary report as th!s is not on the basi-s ot attoramg an ODDonuntiv ot hearins ro tne peiitioner. and snaii undertaKe mvesrgation inaepenaenm. in accoraance wan law. 3. After hearing tearned counsei for the appeiiant and after going through the Impugne" order, i am of the opinion that learned Sing!e .Judge has rightiy observed that there is no irreguiarity in "irectlna investiaation by the police for missing of kerosene in Gram Pancha^t Amera and iurther directiQn to the poiice not to be influenced bv the reoort of the Chief Executive Officer and conduct independent enquiry in accordance with iaw and thus, the apprehension of the aDDeiiant herein has been fuily taken care of. 4. "u'e tlnd no substance !n tne apDeal and tne same deserves ro oe ana is 3CC-OrQ IHQ IV Q !Sm !SSen . . „.__^ " Sd/- Dliirendra Mishra Judge StifV. Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge