IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6712 OF 2009 Between: Syed Arif Ali Saberi and another. ..... PETITIONERS. AND The State of A.P., Rep. By its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P, Hyderabad, and another. ..... RESPONDENTS. Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased to call for the records in Crime No.493 of 2007 on the file of Humayun Nagar police station, Hyderabad and quash the same. The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. J. KANAKAIAH, Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the first Respondent, the Court made the following: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6712 OF 2009 ORDER: Heard Sri Jalli Kanakaiah, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri A. Ramesh, learned counsel representing the learned Public prosecutor for the first respondent. No notice is being ordered to the second respondent as the petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission. Crime No.493 of 2007 on the file of Humayun Nagar police station was registered on the written report from the second respondent alleging that the first petitioner was a Government employee on the date when no earning member and financial status Certificate was obtained to secure employment for the second petitioner on compassionate grounds, on the death of his mother who is the wife of the first petitioner. The matter is under investigation and what the petitioners claim is that, the first petitioner retired from service on 31-12-2005 and the application to Revenue Divisional Officer was made on 03-01-2006 and hence no facts were concealed or misrepresented. The allegations of the second respondent in his written report and the denials of the petitioners in the Criminal petition, involve disputed questions of fact and the statutory investigating agency can be believed to unearth the truth concerning the sequence of events and it will undoubtedly come to an appropriate conclusion on the culpability or otherwise of the petitioners with reference to the certificate obtained by the petitioners for purposes of securing employment on compassionate grounds to the second petitioner. Any premature interference on exercise of inherent jurisdiction of this Court, which is available in the rarest of rare cases is not called for when what has been raised is only a disputed question of fact as to the time and manner in which the Certificate in question was obtained and what conclusions have to be arrived from such circumstances about the culpability or otherwise of the petitioners. Sri J. Kanakaiah, learned counsel for the petitioners brought to the notice that due to pendency of these Criminal proceedings, the career of the second petitioner is jeopardized since about two years and requested that at least a positive direction may be given to the investigating agency to investigate and complete the investigation at the earliest for which Sri A. Ramesh, learned counsel representing the learned Public prosecutor has no objection. Therefore, while the Criminal petition is dismissed, the Station House Officer, Humayun Nagar police station, Hyderabad, is directed to complete the investigation in Crime No.493 of 2007 on the file of his police station as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within three months from the date of communication of the order of this Court and file his report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Court of competent jurisdiction. The copy of this order shall be communicated to the said station house officer for compliance. ____________________ G.BHAVANI PRASAD, J Date: 25-08-2009. Dsh.