IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.5626 of 2005 Between: Chukka Venkatadri and 8 others ..... PETITIONERS AND The District Collector, Ongole, Prakasam District and 3 others .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.5626 of 2005 O R D E R: It is the case of the petitioners that the 1st petitioner filed suit in O.S.108/1993 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Cheerala and obtained judgment dated 06.04.1995 declaring that the spring channels situated in Sy.Nos. 90 of Kothapet village shown in the plaint plan are exclusively meant for cultivation of the suit schedule property and consequential injunction restraining the Government from interfering with the right of the plaintiffs to draw water from the said channel. It is stated that though a decree was passed against the Government in O.S.108/1993, the respondents are making attempts to assign certain lands in favour of third parties, therefore, the petitioners made a representation dated 28.02.2005 in continuous of the earlier representation about the action of the certain people in closing the culverts and constructing the huts in the said land by destroying the property of the petitioners and request to take up appropriate action. The 3rd respondent filed counter stating that there is no closure of spring channels and no attempt was made to close the spring channels in view of the directions in O.S.108/1993. In view of the averments made in the counter of the 3rd respondent, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the 1st respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioners dated 28.02.2005, in accordance with law. No order as to costs. ________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 10.03.2011 Dsr