IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 9362 of 2008. Decided on: 16.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Anil Kumar Sharma. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. H.K. Paul, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): The present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments since the initial appointment of the petitioner was only for a limited period. Consequently, the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 16, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?