IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1880 of 2009 1.RAMESHWAR MANJHI 2. Karoo Manjhi Both sons of Shankar Manjhi, resident of Vill. Anandpur, P.S. and District- Nawadah. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 24.12.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that though the petitioners have been alleged for causing assault and their assault caused injury including cut injury on the hand of the informant but petitioners are agnates having land dispute. There is case and counter case both sides sustained injury which also resulted in conviction for the offence under section 323 of the I.P.C. and petitioner no.1 is awarded punishment for three months under sections 323 and 147 and petitioner no.2 is awarded punishment for six months under sections 324 and 148 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel emphasizes on the point of sentence only by referring above submission to the period undergone by them which they faced after their surrender on 24.11.2009. Sentences are to run concurrently so further specification of the period of sentence for each of the offences is not necessary when I am of the opinion that the period undergone is sufficient towards the punishment. In the result, revision petition is partly allowed on the point of sentence. The period of sentence is modified by minimizing to the period already undergone by the petitioners confirming the 2 conviction. The abovenamed petitioners are directed to be released forthwith. Let this order be faxed at the cost of the petitioners. AnilKr.Sinha ( Mandhata Singh, J.)