1 dgm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.8015 OF 2008 PETITION NO.8015 OF 2008 PETITION NO.8015 OF 2008 ALONG ALONG ALONG WITH WITH WITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.8016 OF 2008 PETITION NO.8016 OF 2008 PETITION NO.8016 OF 2008 -------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ------------------------------------------------------------- Mrs.S.V.Parab for the petitioner in both petitions. Mr.K.A.Chothabni for respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 27.02.2009 : 27.02.2009 : 27.02.2009 P.C. The petitioner/wife has challenged the impugned order dated 12.08.2008 whereby the her interim application for interim maintenance as well as application to produce documents are kept pending by observing that both the applications to be decided along with the main petition. The fact that there is an interim application filed for maintenance and an application to produce documents for deciding the said interim maintenance application 2 just cannot be tagged like this along with main petition. It is desirable that such application should be disposed of as early as possible. The other side has no objection if these applications are disposed of first. In view of this, both these petitions are allowed. The impugned order dated 12.08.2008 in both the petitions are quashed and set aside. (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) V. MOHTA,J.) V. MOHTA,J.)