WP(C) 728/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.D.AGARWAL Heard Shri K.Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. M. Bardoloi, lea rned standing counsel, B.T.C., appearing for respondents No. 4,5,7,8, and 9. Mr. Gogoi, learned counsel is heard on behalf of respondent No.2 and Mr. M K Misra, learned counsel is heard on behalf of respondents No. 1,3 and 6. As agreed by the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being di sposed of at the admission stage itself. The sole prayer of the writ petitioners is that another group of 204 assistant t eachers had filed writ petition No.3346 of 2008 and in the said writ petition, t his court directed the respondents to pay their salaries upto 3.3.2009. According to Mr. Sarma, the case of the present petitioners stand on the same f ooting. During the course of hearing Ms. Bardolai, learned standing counsel, BTC has sub mitted that BTC has already taken a decision that the arrear salaries of all the teachers shall be paid till the date of their termination provided the petition ers have rendered their services. In view of the aforesaid statement of the learned standing counsel, BTC, the wr it petition stands disposed of in terms of the statement made by the standing co unsel, BTC and the BTC is directed to make the payment as expeditiously as possi ble.