1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5996 OF 2005 Shri.Shivaji Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Barshi, District Solapur ..Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. .... Mr.V.M.Thorat for the Petitioner. Mrs.S.S.Bhende, AGP for the Respondents. .... CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & F.I.REBELLO & F.I.REBELLO & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ. JJ. JJ. 5th October, 2005. P.C. : Learned AGP waives notice for the Respondents. Rule. Heard forthwith. 2 Considering the controversy and the judgments of this Court interpreting Rule 9 of the M.E.P.S. Rules, Respondent No.2 is directed to work out the reservation considering that Rule 9 contemplates 34% reservation. After so working out, Respondent No.2 to issue fresh directions if there is still then a backlog. The decision be taken within a period of four weeks from today. Rule made absolute accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)