IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH MARCH 2009 / 4TH CHAITHRA 1931 W.P(C).No. 9568 of 2009(M) --------------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- V.L.TOM, 'VAYALIL VEEDU', PIRAVANTHOOR P.O., PATHANAPURAM TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.MANOJ RAMASWAMY RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOLLAM REVENUE DIVISION, KOLLAM. 3. THE THAHSILDAR, PATHANAPURAM TALUK, PUNALUR-691305. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PIRAVANTHOOR VILLAGE, PIRAVANTHOOR P.O., PUNALUR. 5. SRI. JOSEKUTTY, 'VAYALIL VEEDU', PIRAVANTHOOR P.O., PIRAVANTHOOR. GOVT. PLEADER, SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- W.P.(C).No.9568 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 25th day of March, 2009. JUDGMENT Against cancellation of mutation, petitioner has filed Ext.P5 appeal before the 2nd respondent. Complaint in this writ petition is regarding the delay in the disposal of the appeal. Taking into account the case of the petitioner regarding the pendency of Ext.P5, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 appeal with notice to the petitioner and the 5th respondent. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 2 months from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. In the meanwhile if the petitioner so desires, it will be open to him to move the appellate authority to obtain the necessary interlocutory orders as he deems fit. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/