IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29941 of 2009 HARISHANKAR PRASAD @ HARISHANKAR PRASAD YADAV Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 30.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Appearance of a lawyer for Ex-Mukhiya strengthens the submission made on behalf of the learned counsel that his legal act has been made ground for accusation, otherwise payment of Panchayat Sikshika was stopped due to her not attending school from joining of the Mukhiya of the office. Further, persons decided by Aam Sabha were allowed Indira Awas may be some mistake but not constituting offences like 420, 467 and 490 of the I.P.C. At the stage, I find allegations not sufficient for rejection of petitioner’s anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Chiraiya P.S. Case No. 40 of 2009, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Motihari, East Champaran subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)