HIGH COURT OF JUDJCATURE CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR DIVSSIONBENCH CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI H.L. DATTU,CJ & HON'BLE SHRI V.K. SHRSVASTAVA, J. 6d WRST APPEAL N0.68 OF 2007 ^ APPELLAjSjT RESPQNDENTS ^' .4'*- Ramnath Vishwakarma, Aged 60 years, S/o Sahdev Vishwakarma, Occupation Shock Up Mechanic, Near Pawan Taikies, Railway Crossing, Korba, R/o Durpa Road, Korba (CG). Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Home Affairs.D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. Superintendent of Pollce, Janjgir, District JanJgEr-Champa 3. Superintendent of Poiice, Korba, District Korba (CG). 4. Station House Officer, Poiice Station Kusmunda, Distt. Korba 5. Station Hous^ Officer, Police Station Akaitara, District Janjgir-Champa (CG). 6. Pubiic Heaith Centre, Baioda, Through B.M.O., P.H.C., Baloda, District Janjgir-Champa 7. Mahendra Singh Tomar, S.P., Korba, At present posted at 32 Battalion, Sakri, Biiaspur 8. K.S. Thakur, T.1., PS Kusmunda, Distt. Korba (CG). 9. Dhannu Yadav, i/c-O.P. Baioda, PS. Akaltara, DistS. Janjgir-Champa (CG). ' t'^ ^ .^ /•\.' frvr Present: Shri Y. Chatun/edi, counsel for the appeiiant. Shri N.K. Agrawal, Dy. Advocate Generaf for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 29tn SVEarch, 2007) The following oral order of the Court was passed by H.L Dattu, CJ. A writ petltion was fiied by the father of the deceased Kallash Vishwakarma. According to him, his son was murdered by unknown person on 17-2-2004. After iodging the compiaint by the father of the deceased, the Police authoritles are investlgatlng the matter. 2) Since there is some delay in iodging the Flrst Information Report fthe FiR" for short), the petltioner is before this Court for a direction to the respondents - Poiice authoritles to register the FIR in connection wlth thedeath ofhisson. 3) Learned Singie Judge, after calling upon the respondents to fl!e the reports of investigation and also after going through the report otB Forensic Expert has come to the conclusion that the Forensic Expert is not in a position to give categoricai opinlon regarding cause of death of the deceased, therefore, the Police Department is not in a position to Jodge FIR against any person. 4) We have gone through the order passed by the learned Singie Judge and we are of the opinion that the learned SJngte Judge has not committed any error whatsoever, which may cali for our interference. Accordingly, the writ appeai stands rejected. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge