IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN TUESDAY, THE 30TH JUNE 2009 / 9TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 13357 of 2009(L) PETITIONERS: 1. K.S.LALITHAMMA,AGED 59 YEARS, W/O.T.E.GOPINATHAN NAIR,LALITHA NIVAS, MUTTATHUMON,MALLAPPALY EAST P.O.,THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 2. T.E.GOPINATHAN NAIR,AGED 70 YEARS, LALITHA NIVAS,MUTTATHUMON, MALLAPPALY EAST P.O.,THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.ABRAHAM SAMSON RESPONDENTS: 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATHANAMTHITTA. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MALLAPPALLY. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KEZHVAIPUR,PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 4. ANIL KUMAR NAIR,S/O.PETITIONERS 1 & 2, LALITHA NIVAS,MUTTATHUMON, MALLAPPALY EAST P.O.,THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. ADV. SMT.K.V.BHADRA KUMARI FOR R4 SMT.ANILA GEORGE FOR R4 GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.A. SALIM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) 13357/2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT. P1. TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUEDFROM THE MEDICAL BOARD OF THE MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL, KOTTAYAM DATED 19.3.2004. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 14.4.2009. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF RECEIPT OF CERTIFICATE OF POSTING DATED 20.4.2009. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. // TRUE COPY // P.S. TO JUDGE. KNC/- P.R. RAMAN & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) NO. 13357 OF 2009 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = DATED THIS, THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2009. J U D G M E N T Raman, J. Petitioners, who are husband and wife, seeks police protection against the 4th respondent, who is none other than their own son. There are very wild allegations against the 4th respondent which has been strongly refuted in the counter affidavit. This Court granted an interim protection to the petitioners for their life and peaceful living in the residence at Mallappally. In the counter affidavit, the 4th respondent has averred that he is having business concerns at Indoor. He has not raised any claim of residence in the house at Mallappally. In such circumstances, we make the interim order absolute without going into the rival allegations and counter allegations made in the writ petition. It is not necessary for us to take into account all these allegations for the limited purpose of granting police protection for the life of the petitioners and to reside in the house. However, this will not WP(C) 13357/2009 :2: interdict the police from enquiring into any complaint in accordance with law. The writ petition is closed. P.R. RAMAN, JUDGE. P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE. KNC/-