IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 5368 of 2011 Decided on 14.07.2011. Nek Ram …….. Petitioner. Vs. Himachal Road Transport Corporation & another Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Rajinder Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice (oral). The petitioner challenges Annexure P-8, order of suspension dated 5.1.2011. It appears that the order is in the background of alleged matrimonial dispute. Transfer was made on account of the complaint made by a person who claims to be his wife. The petitioner refused to join duty and in the meanwhile the petitioner was put under suspension. According to the petitioner, though he is willing to join duty at Sarkaghat, his native place, his joining is not accepted. 2. We have gone through the entire history of the case as seen from the records. We do not find that it will be in the interest of either the petitioner or the Corporation to continue the petitioner under suspension. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of making it clear that in case the petitioner reports for duty at Sarkaghat, his joining shall be accepted and 2 on such joining, the suspension would stand revoked. With respect to the disciplinary action initiated against the petitioner and regularization of the suspension period, the first respondent shall look into the matter and then pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within three months. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice (Justice V.K. Sharma) Judge. July 14, 2011 (LSP/hl)