(1) wp6787-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6787 OF 2011 Dadarao Ramkisan Ingale PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others. RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. B.S. Shinde, advocate holding for Mr. H.S. Bali, advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S.D. Kaldate, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State. ..... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 12th SEPTEMBER, 2011 ORAL ORDER: 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent. 2. Since no orders against the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are sought, as stated by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the service of notice on those two respondents is waived. 3. The facts in Writ Petition No. 4264/2009 (disposed of vide order dated 15th January, 2011) and the facts in the present case are identical. For the (2) wp6787-11 reasons recorded in the order dated 15th January, 2011 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 4264/2009, we direct the respondent/Authorities to consider the proposal submitted by the petitioner on its own merits and decide the same after taking into consideration the material placed by the petitioner in support of his claim. 4. The petitioner to appear before the respondent No. 2 on 28th September, 2011 at 11 a.m. and submit his application alongwith the material in support of his claim. 5. After the application is received from the petitioner, the respondent No. 2 to pass appropriate orders thereon within a period of two weeks therefrom. On the orders being passed by the respondent No.2, the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 shall carry out the necessary corrections in the school record, including the school leaving certificate of the petitioner. Rule is made absolute in above terms. [M.T. JOSHI, J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] npj/wp6787-11