Crl. Misc. No.3242 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-3242 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 12.7.2011 Darshan Singh ...Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab & another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Ramandeep Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kartar Singh, Dy. Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Aman Dhir, Advocate for respondent No.2. Rajan Gupta, J. (oral) This is a petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking pre- arrest bail in a complaint case pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Jalandhar, wherein the petitioner has been summoned under Sections 376, 366, 120-B and 498-A IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to order dated February 08, 2011, the petitioner appeared before the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class on 11th February, 2011 and furnished bail bonds. According to him, the said order was placed on record on March 21, 2011. Learned State counsel submits that it being a complaint case, the investigating agency does not require the petitioner for custodial interrogation. The prayer for pre-arrest bail has, however, been opposed by the State counsel. Crl. Misc. No.3242 of 2011 2 However, in view of the fact that pursuant to ad-interim pre-arrest bail, granted by this court, the petitioner has already surrendered before the trial court and furnished bail bonds, the said order dated February 08, 2011 is hereby made absolute, subject to the conditions as envisaged under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands allowed in aforesaid terms. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 12.7.2011 'rajpal'