IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-1944 of 2008 Date of decision:- 8.7.2008 Geeta and another ...Petitioners. Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Gautam Dutt, Advocate for Mr. Munish Mittal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ajay Ghengas, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Maharaj Kumar, Advocate for respondents no. 4 and 5. RAJESH BINDAL J. The petitioners in the present case had approached this Court for seeking protection of their life and liberty as they are married against the consent of the parents-family members of petitioner No.1. During the pendency of the petition the dispute was amicably settled between the parties. In the reply filed by the State, compromise, affidavits of the petitioners and mother and brother of petitioner no.1 have been annexed who do not have any objection to the marriage of the petitioners. In view of this development, present petition is dismissed as infructuous. July 8, 2008 (RAJESH BINDAL) ritu-II JUDGE