n/b s 7o10-08-2005 hesent: Mr. Sandeep Kumar for the petitioner. Mr'. Anand Yadav for the appticants. Mr. J N Guptafor the respondent no.l. Mr. Prakash Gautam, Advocate for RCS. +WP(C) No. 1008/2002 * This writ petition has been filed impugning ttre award passed by the Arbitrator as well as the appeal against said order'having been dismissed by the Tribunal. In view of role of Sita Rarn Singhal, rcsult of investigation pnrsuant to the order passed by firis court and an inquiry conducted by the Crime Branch of Delhi Police fact of charge sheet having been filed against hirn, CFSL report obtained allegations thar he siphoned of the money of the society and has rcceived money in a clandestine manner and enrolled more nrenrbels than the nrembership of the Society all these aspects have to be considered by the Arbitrator. The award passed by ttre Arbitrator was not on the basis of any docunrents produced by the Srciety, as the Society could not have rnoduced the documents in view of the facts stated above. Tfiereforc, we set aside the impugned order as well as tfue awatd rendercd by the arbitrator and dircct the RegistrarCooperative Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified / 17 TVP(C) NO. 1007/2OU2 Sociery to appoint a qualified person with legal experience as an Arbitrator to dispose of tlte matter after givirrg due consideration of all the citcumstances attd relevant documents which rvill be placed by the parties for considemtion. Nothing said above will constitute an expression of opinion on the merit of controversy between the parties. The writ petition stands disposed of with above directions. In view of the interim ordel stards vacated, the application filed by Mr. Anand Yadav, counsel for the applicants stands disposed of. ,kff,6,, **)* I AUGUST 10,2OO5 P.