HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO C.R.P.No. 3072 of 2010 Date: 23-07-2010 Between Murikipudi Veeranjaneyulu and others ………… Petitioners And Kandala Seshacharyulu and others …… Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO C.R.P.No. 3072 of 2010 ORDER: This Revision Petition is filed, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia seeking to assail the order, dated 27- 04-2010 in I.A.No.914 of 2010 in an unnumbered Appeal on the file of the Principal District Judge, Guntur. The grievance of the petitioners is against the dismissal of I.A.No.914 of 2010, where he sought for condonation of delay in re- presentation of the Appeal. There is no dispute with regard to the fact that originally when the suit or appeal is filed and it is returned with certain objections, and when the delay in complying with those objections is not an inordinate one, normally the Courts would consider and condone the same. However, condonation of such delay in representation would be between the parties and the Court concerned alone. By allowing the delay, the same is nothing but affording an opportunity to the parties for an effective adjudication of the issue involved in the lis. Apart from that, the lis shall not be adjudicated on mere technicalities, but on its own merits so as to avoid multiplicity of the proceedings of this nature. It is also well established long back that the rules or procedure should be for the benefit of the parties, but not to punish them. In view of the same, the lower Court is not justified in dismissing the Application to condone the delay in re-presentation of the Appeal. The Civil Revision Petition is, accordingly, allowed and the impugned order, dated 27-04-2010 is set aside. Consequently, I.A.No.914 of 2010 stands allowed. In the circumstances, no order as to costs. ________________ B. PRAKASH RAO, J Date: 23-07-2010 YCR