IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 26977 of 2007 Between: M/s.K.K.Agro Products, rep.by its partner, Sri Mahesh Kumar, Khetan, S/o.Sri Parameshwar Lal Khetan R/o,Adilabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The General Manager, District Industries Centre Adilabad 2 The Commissioner of Industries, AP Hyderabad 3 The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary to Government , Industries & Commerce Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction more in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the impugned letter No.30/3/2005/0894/0894/FD-2 dated 19.7.2007 issued by the 2nd respondent insofar as not granting all the incentives as prescribed in G.O.Ms.No.333 Industries and Commerce (C&EP) Department dated 14.11.2003 and as per the G.O.ms.No.55 Industries & Commerce (C&EP) Department dated 5.3.2004 except market cess as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the orders passed by the Division Bench of this Hon`ble Court made in WA.No.1243 of 2006 dated 26.3.2007 and consequently declare that the petitioner firm is entitled for grant of all the incentives and benefits prescribed in G.O.Ms.No.333 Industries and Commerce (C&EP) Department dated 5.3.2004 with effect from 24.4.2004 treating that the petitioner unit is a new unit as per para 8 of G.O.Ms.No.333 Industries & Commerce (C&EP) Dept., dated 14.11.2003 without reference to the date of its commercial production i.e. 19.11.2003. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.T.SURYA KARAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 26977 of 2007 O R D E R: Sri G.Pramod Kumar, advocate, representing Sri T.Suryakaran Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI,J Date: 26-06-2008 Note: Issue c.c. in two days B/o KLP