1 ca11917.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11917 OF 2011 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.643 OF 2006 [ Yashwant Bhanudasrao & Ors. vs. Shivaji s/o Chandsrasen Manyeri & Ors. ] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. Vikram S. Kadam, Advocate for applicants. Mr. P.D. Suryawanshi, Advocate for R-1. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 20TH DECEMBER, 2011 PER COURT : . Heard learned Counsel appearing for the applicants and learned Counsel for respondents. This application is filed by the applicants for adding them as party respondents in the second appeal. It is the case of the applicants that they are subsequent purchasers and they have interest in the suit property. 2 ca11917.11 2. The application is vehemently opposed by the Counsel for the respondent - original plaintiff. He submits that, the applicants are not necessary parties. 3. I have given due consideration to the rival submissions. It is not in dispute that, the applicants are subsequent purchasers of the suit property. In that view of the matter and looking to the interest of the applicants, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A) and (B) and same stands disposed of. . Time being prayer clause (C) is not considered. . Learned Counsel for the applicants to take necessary steps to add the applicants as party respondents in the 3 ca11917.11 second appeal. . It will be open for the added respondents to file appropriate application for vacating the interim relief. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/DEC11