IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12730 of 2006 Shibendra Prasad Verma, Son of Late Basudeo Lal Das, resident of Mohalla- Kayasth Tole, Ward No.25, Purab Bazar, P.O. + P.S. Saharsa, District-Saharsa, retired Lecturer, Department of Chemistry, M.L.T. College, Saharsa -------- Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar,Patna 3. B.N.Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura through its Registrar 4. The Vice- Chancellor, B.N.Mandal, University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura 5. The Registrar, B.N.Mandal, University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura 6. The Finance Officer, B.N.Mandal, University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura 7. The Principal , M.L.T. College, Saharsa ------------------------------ Respondents. ----------- 02 20-04-2011 Heard Sri Amrendra Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Hemendra Prasad Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent nos.3 to 6/ B.N.Mandal University, Madhepura and Sri Sanjiv Kumar Singh, learned A.C. to Govt. Pleader no.15. The present writ petition was initially filed with a prayer to direct the Respondents to pay the arrears of pension and other retiral dues of the petitioner. During the pendency of the present writ petition, grievances of the petitioner were redressed and, as such, counter affidavit on behalf of the Respondent nos. 3 to 6 was filed giving details. In this case, a rejoinder to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of Respondent nos. 3 to 6 has been filed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is true that the payment has been made, but calculation made by the authorities concerned has been done 2 incorrectly. After getting payment, the petitioner filed a representation before Respondent no.5 i.e. the Registrar, B.N.Mandal University, Madhepura. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed Annexure-3 as well as calculation chart disputing the calculation made by the University. The Court is of the opinion that such dispute cannot be adjudicated by this Court. However, this matter can be examined by the authorities concerned itself. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation with calculation chart before the Respondent no.5, i.e. Registrar, B.N.Mandal University, Madhepura within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed by the petitioner, Respondent no.5 is required to examine the same on the basis of materials on record and thereafter pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of filing of such representation. It is made clear that if Respondent no.5 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he will also pass appropriate order for making payment of the due amount, if any, within the aforesaid time. In case of refusal, Respondent no.5 is directed to pass speaking order within the aforesaid time, i.e. within a period of four months from the date of filing of such representation. The writ petition stands disposed of with the above observation and direction. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)