IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PIL PIL PIL WRIT PETITION NO. 906 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 906 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 906 OF 2005 Jitendra Singh. ] .. Petitioner Versus 1. The President, MHADA & 7 ors. ] .. Respondents Mr. Suraj Kudalkar for the petitioner. Mr. N.P. Pandit, AGP, for respondents No.1 to 4. Mr. V.R. Dhond with Mr. S.V. Kadam i/b M/s. Kadam & Co. for respondents No.5 to 8. CORAM: R.M. LODHA & A.S. BAGGA, JJ. DATED: 07TH JUNE, 2006 P.C. : . We heard the counsel for the petitioner and perused the Writ Petition. 2. The petitioner claims to have filed the present Writ Petition in the interest of the revenue of the State. His allegation is that a tower of 15 floors at plot No.76, Bhau Daji Road, Matunga, Mumbai, has been constructed by respondents No.5 to 8 by utilising FSI 2.5 on the basis of bogus list of tenants. According to the petitioner, the list of 37 tenants submitted by : 2 : respondents No.5 to 8 was bogus and that FSI 2.5 could not have been permitted. 3. We are afraid, it is too late in the day to order enquiry into the aspect whether the list of 37 tenants submitted by respondents No.5 to 8 was bogus or not. 4. The Writ Petition does not deserve to be entertained. 5. Dismissed. Sd/- [R.M. [R.M. [R.M. LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] Sd/- [A.S. [A.S. [A.S. BAGGA, J.] BAGGA, J.] BAGGA, J.]