IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR MONDAY, THE 18TH DECEMBER 2006 / 27TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 WP(C).No. 12855 of 2006(E) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER: ----------------- CHANDU, LATHA BHAVAN, OORUPOIKA, EDAKKODE VILLAGE, CHIRAYINKIL TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH ADV. SRI. KRISHNA MANI RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, CHIRAYINKEEZHU. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, EDAKKODE VILLAGE OFFICE, EDAKKODE VILLAGE, CHIRAYINKEEZHU TALUK. ADDL. R4 IMPLEADED 4. THANKAPPAN S/O. VELUKUTTY, AGED 57 YEARS, THULAYIL VEEDU, MELATTUMOOZHI, KARIMKUTTIKARA P.O., VAMANAPURAM VILLAGE, NEDUMANGAD TALUK (AS PER ORDER DATED 29.8.06 IN I.A.11827/06) BY ADV. SRI.K.SATHEESH KUMAR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. V.T.K. MOHANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C)12855/06 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF PLAINT DATED 23/3/05 IN O.S.207/05 BEFORE MUNSIFF'S COURT, ATTINGAL. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT DATED 25.10.05. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF LEASE ARRANGEMENT DATED 10.5.05. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 12.5.05. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF LICENCE DATED 12.5.05. EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DATED 25.5.05. EXT.P7: TRUE COPY OF OBJECTION TO EXT.P6 DATED 18.8.05. EXT.P8: TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION I.A.1086/05 DATED 25.5.05 FILED BEFORE MUNSIFF'S COURT, ATTINGAL. EXT.P9: TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 3.3.06 IN I.A.1086/05 DATED 25.5.05 BEFORE MUNSIFF COURT, ATTINGAL. /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J. -------------------------- W.P.(C)NO. 12855 OF 2006 ------------------------- DATED THIS THE 18th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2006 JUDGMENT Petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.207/05 on the file of Munsiff Court, Attingal. Petitioner filed an application for an interlocutory order of mandatory injunction. It was dismissed by learned Munsiff under Ext.P9 order. Eventhough it is an appealable order, petitioner did not file an appeal. Instead this petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India. 2. When petitioner has a substantive right of appeal against Ext.P9 order, the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of Constitution of India cannot be invoked. This Petition is dismissed. Like any other interlocutory order Munsiff is to dispose the suit untrammeled by any observation contained in Ext.P9 order. M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,JUDGE Acd