IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.4790 of 2006 Date of Decision.12.10.2011 Vandana w/o Rakesh Kumar Khurana d/o Sh. Kavi Raj Sareen .....Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kumar Khurana son of Sh. Om Parkash s/o Sh. Haveli Ram .....Respondent Present: Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that parties have compromised the matter and they have separated. Learned counsel further states that in view of the subsequent development, the civil revision petition itself is not pressed and it should be dismissed as withdrawn. 2. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE September 12, 2011 Pankaj*