1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.104 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1290 OF 2009 Pravin Balkrishna Gupta .. Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.S.K.Pathare for the petitioner. Ms.Smita Gaidhani, A.G.P for respondent No.1. Mr.G.D.Utangale i/by Utangale & Co for respondent No.2. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 12th November 2009. P.C: . The learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent (Chief Officer, SRA) states that the 2nd respondent was not represented before the Division Bench when order dated 10th August 2009 was passed. He, however, states that the 2nd respondent will abide by the statement which is recorded in the said order dated 10th August 2009. He states that the 2nd respondent is willing to give hearing to the petitioner on a date which suits the petitioner. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that hearing can be fixed on 23rd November 2009 at 11.00 a.m. The learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent states that hearing will be given to the petitioner by the Secretary of the SRA on 23rd November 2009 at 11.00 a.m and appropriate order will be passed within a period of 15 days from the date on 2 which hearing is completed. 2. The statements made by the learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent are accepted. In view of the said statements, a willingness has been shown by the 2nd respondent to comply with the order of this Court. At this stage, no further action is called for in contempt petition and the contempt petition is disposed of. (A.S.OKA,J)