N THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAR ‘ AT BILASPUR ' aged ,‘ " U wpl227)No gag /2010(SB) smGLE BEWH I PETITIONERS/ : 1. ‘Smt. Shana Ban W/o AP#ELLANTS ‘ .- ‘ Chhabah; Sahug A V ‘about 57 years R'/o Village ‘ ‘ ' ‘H‘A ‘i ‘ ‘ ‘ Bhlrau Tahsil Gurur Dlstt? ' ‘ ‘Durg (c G) ’ ‘ 2. Sum? Kanu Ba1 W/o ‘ Guman Slngh Sahu, aged” about 54 yeal s, R/o‘Vlllage‘ V. 'Parséda (Armarii Post 1 Mokha Tahs11 Gunlderhl : V 3.“ V Dlstt. Durg (C.G‘.) H :3. 'Smt, Shyam Bai, .W/Vos‘: T'Ba'nshi Lall sahu‘ aged ‘about 51 yeals ‘R/o V1llage ; V Pot1yad1h Tahs1] & Dlstt ‘ Dhamtan(CG) i 4. s'mt. Kumari Baj,‘ ,W/o‘ Kishan Lal Sahu, aged.’_ ‘ about 42 years, R/b Village H‘ ‘ ’ . v2". 2 Perpar, Tahsil‘ gutu‘r, , Distt. Durg (C.G.)" 3‘ l '2 ; l §‘ V ' i I 5. ‘xSmt. Dokeshwari ‘@ ‘ l V‘ ,5 l ‘ ; ‘ L ‘Delishwari w‘/o' B'isahu‘“ ‘ W I ‘ ’ ; W ' I ‘ ‘ I I Ram Sahu aged about 4O years R/o Vlllage Damtola" ‘ ' {‘l‘ l ‘l ‘ a V‘ H (Gurur) Tahs11 GurLtr, L ‘ ‘ Distt. Durg (cob) > 1 H ' ,. . a @ VERSUS RESPONDENTS / :1. Manrakha’ (dead) PLAINTIFFS ! 2. Smt. Chitrrekha Bai, W/o Punu Ram Sahu, aged about 48 years, iR/o village Basin, Taheil Gurur, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 3. State of Chhattisgarh Through — The Collector, Durg Distt. Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA W 0 Smt Shan Bal and others m Peuuon (227) No Eo9s/201 the appellate court has'i ‘cted the petmoners apphcation under 'sectlon 151 of CPC for saymg the proceedmgs under taken by one K ‘ a1 for mutanon of h1s t name 1n the revenu record on the suength of a W111 executed by‘ deceased Manrakhan ' decree wh1ch 1s under challenge before the hrst apdellate court Counsel for the petm nets would submlt that 1f the records are ‘crr ted dunng pendency of the first appeal and when the matter rs o u-judrce 1t wrll create complrcatlon He wou urer sunnt ta ‘sb ld fth b ht rll executed by Maurakhan m favour of Koma 1s an lssue to aw l be, .; WIRS TIONE Versus ‘ L Manrakhan (dead) and others ShnB P Slngh counselfor the pet1t10ners Shn Vmod Tekam, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent V ‘ I hiE, itk‘is directed that the appellate, Court :shall do-well to decide, th t e ir§t appea1 within‘aperiod ofthree months from the date ofrecei‘pto ‘xl'ufled copy ofthis order. ‘Needles'sgto say that if the‘name ’of.the said 'Komal is mutated e reVenué record, the same shall be subject to the decree which may ultimately be ‘pa‘s‘s‘ed‘bythe‘ Civil Court. ( h : ce I 1 5i) The writ petition habthtis'no‘substance and i‘sdismissed wit Sd/ g Prashant Kumar Mishra udge i ) 1 f J l