IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH JUNE 2010 / 9TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 18896 of 2010(J) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. THANKAYYAN NADAR, AGED 76 YEARS, RESIDING AT KAITHAKUZHI MEKKE PUTHEN VEEDU, ANKODU DESOM, PERUNKIDAVILA VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK. 2. JOICE, AGED 69 YEARS, W/O. THANKAYYAN NADAR, RESIDING AT KAITHAKUZHI MEKKE PUTHEN VEEDU, ANKODU DESOM, PERUNKIDAVILA VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.R.GOPAN RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (RURAL), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 2. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NEYYATTINKARA. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VELLARADA POLICE STATION, NEYYATTINKARA. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARYANCODE POLICE STATION, NEYYATTINKARA. 5. AJIKUMAR, AGED 34 YEARS, S/O. THANKAYYAN NADAR, RESIDING AT KAITHAKUZHI MEKKE PUTHEN VEEDU, ANKODU DESOM, PERUNKIDAVILA VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK. G.P. SHRI T K VIPINDAS FOR R1 - 4. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 18896 of 2010 APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS : EXT.P1 : PHOTOCOPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT DT.31.1.10 EXT.P2 : PHOTOCOPY OF THE WILL NO.16/2010 OF PERUNKIDAVILA SUB REGISTRY OFFICE DT.26.3.2010 EXT.P3 : PHOTOCOPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT.14.5.2009 EXT.P4: PHOTOCOPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS 2 TO 4 DT.14.5.09 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL // TRUE COPY// K. M. JOSEPH & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 18896 of 2010 J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 30th day of June, 2010 JUDGMENT Joseph, J. The petitioner has approached this Court for a direction to respondents 1 to 4 to provide protection to the lives and property of the petitioner. 2. We have already passed an interim order. 3. Though served, there is no appearance for the party respondents. 4. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of by making the interim order absolute. (K. M. JOSEPH) Judge (M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS) Judge tm