Crl. Misc. No. M- 5967 of 2009 Ashok Kumar v. State of Haryana & Others Present: Mr. Gautam Dutt, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Singh Ghangas, DAG, Haryana for respondent No.1. Mr. Narinder Prashar, Advocate for respondent No.2 (Anchal Garg). Mr. Adish Gupta, Advocate for respondents No.3 and 4. *** Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 has filed his Power of Attorney in Court today which is taken on record. When the case was taken up, the complainant/respondent No.2 (Anchal Garg) has put in appearance and is identified by her counsel Mr. Narinder Prashar who it is submitted that the complainant and the petitioner are now residing together as husband and wife. A copy of the written compromise along with the copies of the affidavits of the complainant and the petitioner have been filed in the connected Crl. Misc. No. M-5253 of 2009. Learned counsel for the State on instructions from ASI Shamsher Singh Police Station CIA Staff, Faridabad has submitted that in view of the compromise that has been effect between the parties, the custody of the petitioner is not required in the present case. In view of the above, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and is accordingly dismissed. (S.S. SARON) JUDGE March 21, 2009 amit