IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-16278 of 2008 Date of decision:- 9.7.2008 Des Raj and another ...Petitioners. Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Rajinder Singla, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ranbir Singh Rawat, Asstt. A.G., Punjab. RAJESH BINDAL J. The petitioners are parents-in-law of respondent no.2- complainant in matrimonial dispute case where a complaint has been filed with the police with the allegation that she had been harassed on account of demand of dowry. The husband of respondent no.2 also filed a complaint with the police that the respondent no.2-complainant alongwith her parents had come to their residence and taken away cash and jewellery etc. and that complaint is also pending. On investigation, SHO found the allegations against the complainant-respondent no.2 to be prima facie correct and sent the same for legal opinion to District Attorney, which is pending. The only prayer made by the petitioners at this stage is that in case FIR registered against them is for any non-bailable offence in the matrimonial dispute between their son and respondent no.2, they may be given two days prior notice before arrest. The same is not seriously opposed. Accordingly, it is directed that in case FIR is registered against the petitioners for any offence in the matrimonial dispute between the son of Criminal Misc. No. M-16278 of 2008 -2- the petitioners and respondent no.2 before their arrest the petitioners may be given two days advance notice. Disposed of. July 9, 2008 (RAJESH BINDAL) ritu-II JUDGE