IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 17546 of 2009 Between: K.Subbaramaiah . .Petitioner And Sub-Inspector of Police, WPS, CCS, Hyderabad and others. .. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO.17546 OF 2009 ORDER: The petitioner approached this Court and filed the present writ petition with the following prayer: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit it is prayed that this Honourable Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ or writs or direction/s more particularly in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents in interfering with the day-to-day activities of the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the Respondents not to harass the petitioner”. 2) On instructions, it is submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader that the daughter-in-law of the petitioner, by name Smt.P.Sandhya, lodged a private complaint before the XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad and on a reference by the learned Magistrate, a case in Crime No.262 of 2008 was registered by the Woman Police Station, CCS, Hyderabad against the petitioner, his son and daughter for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 406, 506 IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. It is further stated that after completion of investigation, a charge sheet was also filed against the petitioner and 2 others i.e., the husband and sister-in-law of the complainant therein and the same was numbered as C.C. No.162 of 2009. It is only to know the whereabouts of the other accused, the police visited the house of the petitioner and inquired about them. Except that, the respondents have not harassed the petitioner in any manner. 3) Now that a charge sheet has already been filed before the Magistrate concerned, the police shall not visit the petitioner and interfere with his day-to-day affairs. If there is anything against the petitioner, it is for the respondents to bring the same to the notice of the Magistrate concerned, who in turn can pass appropriate orders. 4) Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________________ (GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J) September 2, 2009 KSH