^illVLE DCN^i ^^/(^^^. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PBTITION (Ct flo^S 7-6 /2006 PETITIONER -••^iS Niranjan Pradhan, aged about/^ ls. ••vr,.^ -<>* 62 years, S/o Shri Arjun Pradhan, tiP' ^ ,"c\>-' ^ RESPONDENTS rl >.^w'\.l^.<^ .^t^b ^ot^'c ^' ^ <$k>v R/o Villa^e Lori^tkhar, Tahsil Kasdol, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, -/ Through Secretary, Forest Departm.en.t, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur 2. Union oflndia, through Secretary Forest Departraent, New DelhJ f 3. Forest Range Officer,--' Baranw-apara (Abhyaran), Distt. Ratpur 4. Divisional forest Officer,,' General Forest Division, Ralpur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 tmpTI Sh*<l<ft 73f ^iqid'Sf, ®Tn+l'l6,(sKni^y frv r - ^^ -?/ TA ^...^:.....^..../.^ 200 z^ W^l 4d* (•i°ita°«t.aT) sn^BT^rR-fi* iraT31R?Tsnilcn| ??ctiw:trf?cT3n^r 12.10.2006 Shri Parag Kotecha, counsel] Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocaf on advance copy. Shri Raghvendra Pradhan, cit India on advance copy. Argumente heard. Qrder dictated as follows: far the petitioner. e for the State/respondents No.1 , 3 S 4 >unsel for r^pondent No.2/ Union of ONALORDER SUNIL KUMAR SiNHA. J. By way of this writ petitio|i Constitution of India, She petition^ directions to the State authorities constitutiori and election of the with the said prayer, he has also pra|s schedules the date for election of th< should also be quashed. The subject matter of this the sutgect mattere of WP No.55: have been heard and dismissed by t| Learned counsel for the petit State/respondents does riot dispute In view ofthe above, thisWrii stage on the grounds and reasons in W.P. No.5524/2003 andW.P. No.i +io(d<n-f xiNdTffte^^resn: ^i3l1^R'3;n^?T 2.10.2006) filed under Article 226/227 of the r, has prayed for issuance of certain !|o fonnulate the rules pertaining to the me|iibeis of Van Suraksha Sarrvti. Along lyed that the memo Annexure P-3, which office bearers of Van Suraksha Samiff, Wtit tit Petition is exactly identical to that of |i/20re and W.P. No.5525/2006, which kis Court vide ordens dated 10.10.2006. ioner as wel! as tearned counse! for the :|iis factualposition. Pelition is also dismissed at the motion ^ted in orders dated 10.10.2006 passed J525/2006. -- §d/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge ^i 1~-1_