... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.945 OF 1999 APPLICATION NO.945 OF 1999 APPLICATION NO.945 OF 1999 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.445 OF 1996 .................................................................. Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders. orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. .................................................................. M/s Vyas and Bhalwal for the Applicant. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : APRIL 18, 2007. : APRIL 18, 2007. : APRIL 18, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Applicant in support of the review Application. The review is sought of a direction contained in clause (ii) of paragraph No.3 of the order dated 23rd February, 1998. The direction contained in the said clause is based on a suggestion made by the counsel appearing for the first Respondent in revision Application which is recorded in the order dated 23rd February, 1998. The perusal of the order dated 23rd February, 1998 shows that no objection was raised on behalf of the Applicant to the said suggestion made by the learned counsel appearing for the first Respondent in revision Application during the course of arguments. 2. Now reliance is sought to be placed on ... 2 ... terms of the contract between the parties. There is no error apparent on the face of the record. Otherwise also there is no other ground for reviewing the order dated 23rd February, 1998. Hence, Application is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE