1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 2115 OF 2006 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2377 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO. 2115 OF 2006 Rukhsana Begum Sayyed Abdul Rahim ...Plaintiff. Vs. Zahida Asad Khan ...Defendant. Mr. Shashipal Shankar for the Plaintiff. Mr. M.L. Palan with Mr. Sahid M. Khan for the Defendant. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 1st OCTOBER, 2009. P.C.- 1 The parties to the suit, for specific performance, settle the matter and signed the consent terms dated 1st October, 2009. The same is taken on record and marked “X”. It is also countersigned by the respective advocates. There is no dispute about the identification of the person, signatures and/or authorization. The statement is also made that there is no third person/party involvement and the consent terms are well within the framework of law and the record. The parties are also present in the Court. 2 2 Accordingly, the suit is decreed, in view of this Consent terms. 3 So far as clause 3 is concerned, the office/Prothonotary and Senior Master, High Court, Bombay to act on the basis of authenticated copy of this order. 4 Undertaking in clause 7 as agreed and accepted by the parties, is also accepted. 5 The Defendant undertakes to handover the share certificates of the property/ flat on or before 8th October, 2009. 6 The suit is accordingly disposed of, in view of this consent terms. 7 The Notice of Motion is also disposed of. 8 The injunction order, as granted earlier, also stands vacated. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)