1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 743 OF 2010 M/s.El Dorado Guarantee Ltd. ...Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents ------ Mr.O.A. Siddiqui and Rajendra Rathod for Applicants Mr. A.S. Shitole -APP for State ------ CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 5TH APRIL, 2010 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicants and the learned APP for the State. 2. The grievance of the Applicants is that the Sessions Court in the revision application filed by the Original Accused against the order of rejection of their discharge, had taken into consideration the documents which were filed by the Respondents in the Trial Court and after going through the said documents, had allowed the revisional application and discharged the Accused. He submitted that it was open to the Sessions Court to consider the documents which were produced by the Accused in the revision 1 application. He submitted that no provision in the Cr.P.C. grants right to the Accused to file any material or document at the said stage. In support of the submission , he relied on a judgment of the Apex Court in the case of State of Orissa and Debendra Nath Padhi reported in 2005 Supreme Court Cases (Cri) 415 3. Issue notice to the Respondent Nos.2 to 4, returnable after 4 weeks. Humdust permitted. 4. S.O. to 3rd May, 2010 (V.M. KANADE J.)