IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3286 of 1999. M/s. Jaipur Syntex Limited, having its registered Office at National High Way No.8, Behror District Alwar VERSUS The Union of India and Others. Date Of Order ::: 13/03/2008. Hon'ble Mr. Narendra Kumar Jain J. Shri R.S. Mehta, Counsel for the Petitioner Shri Ashish Jain, Dy.G.A., for the respondents. By the Court : Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition with the following prayer :- “It is, therefore, prayed that the action of the respondent no.1 and 2 in proceeding for demolishing boundary walls be quashed and set aside and the respondents be directed not to demolish the existing boundary wall and further be directed not to interfere peaceful possession of the petitioner on the land in question. Any other order which is just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice may also kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.” The respondents have filed their reply to the writ petition, and the rejoinder thereto has also been filed by the petitioner. The main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the action of the respondents is violative of principles of natural justice, as without notice to the petitioner the existing boundary wall was going to be demolished by the respondents at the relevant time, therefore, a direction may be issued to the learned counsel for the respondents not to demolish the boundary wall of the petitioner without any notice to him. Learned Dy. G.A., is unable to justify the action of the respondents. So far as the violation of principles of natural justice is concerned, he submits that the respondents will take action after giving notice of four weeks in advance to the petitioner and thereafter needful will be done on their part. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and after considering the same, I think it fit and proper to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents not to demolish the boundary wall of the petitioner without prior notice of four weeks at least to the petitioner. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents not to demolish the boundary wall of the petitioner without prior notice to the petitioner. There will be no order as to costs. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J.