1 S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.5143/2006 Date : 15.11.2006 HON'BLE MR.SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. H.S.S. Kharlia for the applicant. Mr. Vishnu Kachhawaha, Public Prosecutor. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the impugned order. The contention of learned counsel for the applicants is that charge-sheet has been filed in the matter. He submits that some injuries are grevious but injury No.3 which has been assigned to Gurcharn is only on the forearm of the injured and rests of the injuries are simple in nature. He further submits that the case would not traverse beyond Sections 325 and 326 IPC. In last, he prays that the applicants may be enlarged on bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 2 I have considered the submissions made before me and carefully gone through the material available on record. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the present case, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused applicants on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that applicants (1) Gurdeep Singh alias Deepa s/o Gurdayal Singh and (2) Gurcharan Singh alias Channi s/o Gurdayal Singh shall be released on bail in FIR No.484/2006 P.S. Nohar, provided each of them executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J. vij