IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9489 of 2009 RAMESH CHANDRA SINHA, son of Late Rewati Raman Prasad, resident of Raj Kishore Complex, Saptarshi Apartment, Qr. No.203, Kankarbagh, Police Station Kankarbagh, District Kankarbagh, Patna. -----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Commissioner- Cum-Secretary, Higher Education Department, New Secretariat, Patna. 2. The Vice-Chancellor, Patna University. 3. The Registrar, Patna University, Patna. ---Respondents ---- With CWJC No.9491 of 2009 RAMESH CHANDRA SINHA, husband of Late Vijayshree, resident of Raj Kishore Complex, Saptarshi Apartment, Qr. No.203, Kankarbagh, Police Station Kankarbagh, District Kankarbagh, Patna. ---Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Commissioner-Cum-Secretary, Higher Education Department, New Secretariat, Patna. 2. The Vice-Chancellor, Patna University. 3. The Registrar, Patna University, Patna. ----Respondents ----------- 2. 10.8.2009 Since in both these writ applications, the petitioner is the same and the reliefs sought for is against the same respondents, with consent of the parties, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the University as well as the State. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the payment of the retiral dues as indicated in paragraph 1 of both the writ applications. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent- 2 University submits that in case detailed claims on account of all the retiral dues are submitted by the petitioner, the same would be considered without delay. Learned counsel further submits that even for the admitted claims, the respondent University may not be in a position to pay the dues immediately for want of fund. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, although the bills for the claim of retiral dues were submitted in the past, but the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Registrar, Patna University, Patna (respondent no.3) stating the details of his claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of his claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of two weeks. In case such a representation is filed, the respondent no.3 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation and dispose of the same in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months on receipt of such representation, so that the admitted dues of the petitioner could be paid without delay. However, if any of the claims are found not admissible, the petitioner may accordingly be informed with the reasons thereof. It goes without saying that the respondent-University will be at liberty to approach the competent authority of the State Government for release of the necessary fund as per the extant instructions of the State Government. In case such requisition is made, respondent no.1 shall consider the requisition and direct for the release 3 of the fund, if so requires as per the rule. Both the writ applications stand disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)