IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 25TH JUNE 2010 / 4TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 18002 of 2010(A) -------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- P.S.SUSEELAN, FLAT No.23/75/1, SREE DURGA APPARTMENT, KOTTILIL LANE, KANATTUKARA.P.O., THRISSUR-11. BY MR.M.R.SASITH PANICKER, ADVOCATE. RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THRISSUR CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. SECRETARY, THRISSUR CORPORATION. 3. TRIBUNAL FOR LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 4. FINANCE STANDING COMMITTEE, THRISSUR CORPORATION. BY MS. K.R. DEEPA, GOVERNMENT PLEADER. MR. K.B. MOHANDAS, SC FOR THRISSUR CORPORATION. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.18002 OF 2010 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of June, 2010. J U D G M E N T The matter involves the complaint about the non- implementation of the order passed by the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions which is produced as Exhibit P1. The order was passed in a revision petition filed by the petitioner in the matter relating to assessment of building tax. The revision petition was filed challenging the decision of the Standing Committee for Appeals on Taxation of the Thrissur Corporation. The operative portion of the revisional order shows that the Secretary of the Corporation was directed to make fresh proper assessment of the buildings of the petitioner as per law by taking into consideration the assessment of other similar and similarly situated buildings also. The order is dated 20.01.2010. 2. Seeking for implementation of the directions, the petitioner again filed a representation as per Exhibit P2 which is dated 15.05.2010. It is the complaint of the petitioner that so W.P.(C) No.18002/2010 2 far fresh assessment has not been made. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the Corporation also. The competent authority among the respondents 1 and 2 will consider the matter and fresh assessment will be made which will be communicated to the petitioner within a period of two months. This writ petition is disposed of as above. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp