IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 18350 of 2008 Between: Karmika Sangham Priyadarshini Jurala Project,Revulapalli Camp Gadwal 509125 Mahabubnagar District Rep.by its General Secretary Mr Amba Shankar,S/o.Chandrappa ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of A.P Rep.by its Secretary Irregation and Common Area Development Secretariat,Hyderabad 2 The Engineer in Chief Irregation Department Government of A.P Administrative Wing Jalasoudha Buildings,Hyderabad 3 The Superintending Engineer Priyadarshini Jurala Project Circle-1 Government of A.P. Gadwal-509125 Mahabubnagar District 4 Smt P.Renuka W/o.Late G.Anjaneyulu The Executive Engineer Priyadarshini Jurala Project Dam Division Revulapalli Post Dharoor (M) Mahabubnagar District 5 Mr S.Khasim S/o.S.K.Shila Executive Engineer Government of A.P RDS Uppal,Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ(i) declare G.O.Ms No.117 Irrigation and CAS(Ser.IX.2) Department dt.9-7-2007 and consequential proceedings of the Superintending Engineer/3rd Respondent No.SE/PJP/AB/EC3/177 dt 26-7-2008 oﬀering appointment of the 4th respondent as Junior Assistant as illegal and arbitrary(II) declare proceedings No.SE/PJP/AB/EC3/181 dt.26-7-2008 appointing 5th respondent by transfer to the post of Junior Assistant as illegal and arbitrary and (iii) consequently direct the respondent 1to 3 to oﬀer the said posts to the eligible dependants of the deceased employees who died in harness. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.G.VIDYASAGAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR IRRIGATION & COMM AREA DEV. The Court made the following ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition, without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to approach the A.P. Administrative Tribunal. Permission is accorded and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, leaving it open to the petitioner to work out its remedies, in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:25.08.2008. kdl