IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.22550 of 2010 Between: Achina Mallesh and others ..... PETITIONER (S) AND The Station House Officer, Phadisheerif Police Station, Hyderabad and others .....RESPONDENT(S) THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.22550 of 2010 ORDER: The grievance of the petitioners is that the first respondent is not taking any action on respondent Nos.2 to 12 in pursuance of the private complaint filed by them in C.C.SR.No.1618 of 2010 dated 31.05.2010 on the file of the XIV Metropolitan Magistrate, L.B.Nagar. The case of the petitioners is that several civil disputes are pending between them and respondent No.2 at various stages. While so, on 28.04.2010, the petitioners filed a complaint against the unofficial respondents alleging that they abused them in filthy language and pushed the first petitioner in the room existing in Sy.No.75 situated at Kongara Kurdh Village, Maheshwaram Mandal, R.R.District, and, after bolting door from outside, set the house on fire by pouring petrol, thus attempted to kill him. Though the first respondent is under obligation to register the complaint as a Crime and investigate into the same, he is not doing so, instead as a result of the influence exerted by the 3rd respondent, petitioner Nos.1 and 2 are implicated in five criminal cases and they were arrested. Heard both sides. Perused the material on record. The first respondent filed counter affidavit stating that on receipt of the said private complaint, a case in Crime No.335 of 2010 on the file of the Pahadishareef Police Station for the offence punishable under Sections 307, 379, 427, 436, 506, 148, 448 read with 34 IPC has been registered and investigation has been taken up and assured that the investigation will be completed as expeditiously as possible. The learned counsel for the petitioners also submits that after filing of the Writ Petition, crime has been registered and investigation has been taken up. In view of the submission, nothing remains for further adjudication and no further orders need be passed in the Writ Petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________ N.V.RAMANA, J. 9th November 2010 CVRK