CWP No. 1228 of 2008. 20.08.2008 Present: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2. This writ petition is directed against the transfer order of the petitioner. It has been emphatically argued that to accommodate Opposite Party No.3 the petitioner has been transferred. It is always open for the authorities to accommodate its employees at times even on the direction of the Court the employees of the State Government are being adjusted time and again on one or the other grounds. It has been submitted by the learned Counsel that respondent No.3 remained in his home sub-division for five years. However, we find from the order which has been placed before us by the learned Advocate General that now the said order has been modified and respondent No.3 is out of home sub-division. The order is taken on record. The Hon’ble Apex Court in various judgments has expressed its view that the High Court cannot show interference in any transfer matter unless there is any violation of law or any strong case of malafides is made out. There is no such foundation in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, so also the other pending application. (Jagdish Bhalla), C.J. August 20, 2008. ( Kuldip Singh ), J. (rc)