HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BiLASPUR Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.593 of 2009 PETITIONER/: (Accused) RESPONDENT/: (Complainant) Pankaj Jain, S/o Amritlat Jain, aged about 30 years, Proprietor Prabha Auto Finance, Supela, Bhilai, Distt. Durg (CG), R/o 40 Nandi Parisar, Padmanabhpur, Durg, Thana, Tahsil & Distt. Durg (CG) Versus Vijitabh Shrivastava, S/o S. Shrivastava, aged about 34 years, R/o Keiabadi, Begam AIi, Durg, Thana, Tahsil & Distt. Durg (CG) {Criminal Miscellaneous Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminai Procedure, 1973} Present: Mrs. Fouzia Mirza, counsel for the petitioner. SinaleBench: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma. J ORAL ORDER (18-11-2009) 1. This petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. is for quashment of the order dated 3-11-2009 passed by the 12th Additional Sessions Judge (F.T.C.), Durg in Crimina! Revision No.167/2007 reversing the order dated 6-8-2007 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First CIass, Durg in an unregistered complaint case, whereby learned Judicial Magistrate First Class has dismissed the complaint under Section 203 of the Cr.P.C., but in exercise of revisional jurisdiction, learned Additionat Sessions Judge has reversed the order and directed the Judiciai Magistrate First Class to registered the complaint under Sections 420, 467, 468 & 471 of the S.P.C. and try in accordance with iaw. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in exercise of revisional jurisdiction under Section 398 of the Cr.P.C. against the order of dismissal ofthe complaint under Section 203 ofthe Cr.P.C. the revisional Court js not empowered to direct the Magistrate for registration of the Soma B^ase, trial of the case and giving direction to the accused for appearance. Section 398 of the Cr.P.C. only empowers the revisionai Court for directing further inquiry into 'the compiaint dismissed under Section203oftheCr.P.C. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner, perused the order impugned and the order ofthe Judiciat Magistrate First Class, Durg. 4. Admittedly, the 12th Additional Sessions Judge (F.T.C.), Durg has exceeded its jurisdiction in passing the order impugned. The order impugned is not sustainable under the law. Consequently, the petition is allowed. The order impugned is hereby set aside and the case is remitted back to the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Ciass, Durg. The Judicial Magistrate First Class shall make further inquiry into the compjaint and pass order afresh. 5. In view ofthis order, I.A.No.1 stands disposed of. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge L