IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 18TH JULY 2011 / 27TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 40613 of 2003(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- K.PREMA, AGED 31 YEARS, W/O RAJESHKUMAR, AMBILOTHU HOUSE, NEDUNGAM P.O., SREEKANDAPURAM(VIA), KANNUR DISTRICT. (PEON, KANNUR UNIVERSITY) BY ADV. SRI.K.B.SURESH RESPONDENT: ---------------------- KANNUR UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, KANNUR. ADV.SRI.M.SASEENDRAN,SC,KANNUR UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.(C)No.40613/03 PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT.P1: COPY OF DISABILITY CERTIFICATE NO.1440 DT.9.10.02 ISSUED BY THE HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT, GOVT.OF KERALA TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2: COPY OF MEMO NO.AD.C2/223/2001 VOL.II DT.5.5.2003 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENTS' EXTS: NIL TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE dsn T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.40613 Of 2003 -------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JULY, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner, a physically handicapped person, was appointed as a Peon by the respondent-University through the Employment Exchange as per Exhibit P3 order. It is specified in Exhibit P3 that the appointment is only for 179 days or till regular hands join duty. 2. Contending that the regular appointment envisaged by Exhibits P2 and P3 has not yet taken place and there are sufficient number of vacancies to continue her, this Writ Petition has been filed. 3. On behalf of the University, a statement has been filed. It is pointed out that the petitioner was appointed for 179 days from 2.6.2003 to 27.11.2003 and the petitioner's service was terminated on expiration of the period from 27.11.2003. It is pointed out that being an appointee under Rule 9(a)(i) of the General Rules Part II KS & SSR, the petitioner is not entitled to claim appointment on regular basis. W.P.(C)No.40613/03 -2- Evidently, the petitioner joined service as a temporary appointee as per the conditions provided in Exhibit P2. It is well settled by various decisions of this Court that an appointee under Rule 9(a)(i) of General Rules Part II KS & SSR will not get a right to continue in service beyond the period of appointment and will not get any claim for regular appointment also based on the said appointment. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Sd/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn