THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI Writ Petition No.17250 of 2011 ORDER : The petitioner is a cooperative society registered under the provisions of the A.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1964. The authorization for Fair Price Shop dealership obtained by the petitioner-society is void as it has been obtained through the back door without there being any notification for appointment. A perusal of the order dated 30.12.2010 passed by the 1st respondent-District Collector, Srikakulam District, shows that the petitioner-society was kept incharge in respect of the Fair Price shop of Korlakota III, Korlakota village, Amadalavalasa Mandal, Srikakulam District, for some time. Thereafter it was converted as a regular dealer by ratification. As per the Control Order any Fair Price Shop dealership has to be granted by issuing a notification calling for the applications from the eligible candidates. Basing on the said void authorization, the petitioner-society now seeks to challenge the proceedings in Rc.No.2294/2010, dated 13.6.2011, issued by the 2nd respondent, whereby the said authorization of the petitioner- society has been cancelled in order to appoint a dealer on permanent basis. The impugned order has, in fact, been issued in pursuance of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.1574 of 2011, dated 17.3.2011, wherein this Court, after noticing the facts, directed the District Collector and the Revenue Divisional Officer, Srikakulam to initiate immediate steps for filling up the vacancy of Fair Price Shop dealer of Korlakota III on permanent basis and complete the said process within a period of three months. Therefore, the impugned order dated 13.6.2011 cannot be said to be illegal. This Court perused the affidavit of the petitioner filed in support of the writ petition and expresses its displeasure the way how the petitioner has addressed attributing lack of knowledge to a learned Judge of this Court. The intemperate language used points out as if the learned Judge has committed a mistake in passing the order in the absence of the learned counsel for the petitioner therein and the counter on behalf of the respondents. The petitioner is not justified in using such language while addressing his grievance. Learned counsel for the petitioner herein does not even expresses his regrets in this regard. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed. Note: After the above order was dictated in the forenoon, Sri M.Viswanadham, learned counsel for the petitioner represented in the afternoon that the petitioner does not wish to pursue the Writ Petition and seeks to withdraw the same unconditionally. He also undertakes that the petitioner will not challenge the impugned order by filing a separate wit petition or otherwise. The said undertaking is placed on record and the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ________________ NOUSHAD ALI, J. 22nd June, 2011. Skmr/Msr THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI Writ Petition No.17250 of 2011 Date : 22-06-2011 Between : M/s.The Labour Contract Cooperative Society Limited, A society registered under the A.P.Cooperative Societies Act, 1964, bearing Reg.No.A 742, At Korlakota Village, Amadalavalasa Mandal, Srikakulam District, rep. by its President, T.Rama Rao, son of Appaanna, aged 65 years, resident of Korlakota Village and Post, Amadalavalasa Mandal, Srikakulam District. .. Petitioner and The District Collector, Srikakulam District, Srikakulam& 2 Others .. Respondents