IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY VPH CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 3 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION No. 13 OF 2008 IN FCA No. 25 OF 2008 Mrs. Susy Savio Applicant Vs. Mr. Savio Alexander & Anr. Respondents Mr. T. S. Joseph, for the applicant. Mrs. A. S. Pai, APP for the respondent-State. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI, & A. A. KUMBHKONI, JJ. DATE : JULY 29, 2008. 1. This application has been moved for initiating suo-motu contempt proceeding against the respondent on the charges set out in the contempt petition. 2. The Charge No.1 shown in the application isabout the alleged threatening received from the respondent’s lawyer of judicial action for interacting with his employer Air France. The Charge No. 2 is that the respondent tried to creat big scene through his clerk with a pretext of service of summons some time in the month of February, 2008. Charge Nos. 3 and 4 being in respect of certain pleadings, in certain documents, which - 2 - have not been pointed out. In any case, they do not constitute contempt of the Court. 3. The Charge Nos. 5 & 6 is also with regard to the pleadings of pending matters before the Court between the parties. All these assertions in the pleadings do not constitute contempt prima-facie. The Charge Nos. 7,8,9 and 10 of which according to the learned counsel for petitioner, are part of the pleadings and/or charges against his client and constitute contempt. We have gone through these pleadings and they do not constitute prima-facie any contempt. 4. In order to force the results in a litigation between the parties, this is an attempt to make the respondent to succumb. Contempt petition is misconceived and is dismissed accordingly. Sd/- [ BILAL NAZKI, J.] Sd/- [ A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J.]