: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1598 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.1781 OF 1993 M/s.Jain & Jain ....Plaintiff V/s. Anileksha Investment Pvt.Ltd. & Ors. ....Defendants And Tulsi Tower Co.Op.Hsg.Soc.Ltd. & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.M.D. Naik i/b M/s.Kiran Jain & Co. for the Plaintiff. Mr.Brijesh Upadhya i/b Purnanand & Co. for Defendant No.1. Ms.Shikha Raniwale i/b L.C. Tolat & Co. for Defendant No.2. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 25TH AUGUST, 2008. P.C. : 1. The suit is filed for redemption of the mortgage. Defendant No.1 is the mortgagee. The contention of the Plaintiff is that Defendant No.1 wrongly transferred the property to Defendant No.2. Defendant No.2 in turn, it is alleged, has created right in favour of the Respondents, who are sought to be impleaded. 2. The Respondents would therefore be necessary parties. In any event their rights would be affected : 2 : by any decree, that may be passed. 3. In the circumstances, the Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer (a). The amendment to be carried out within four weeks from today.