1appln-3203-10 group IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 3203 of 2010 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 3204 of 2010 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 3205 of 2010 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 3206 of 2010 (FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL) Amitesh Kumar @ Monu.. .. .. .. Applicant. vs. The State of Maharashtra .. .. .. .. Respondent. Mr K. H. Giri, for the Applicant in all the petitions. Mrs A.S.Pai, A.P.P. for the State in Appln. No. 3203/2010. Mr K. V. Saste, A.P.P.for the State in Appln. No. 3204/2010 Mr P. S. Hingorani, A.P.P. for the State. in Appln. No. 3205/2010 Mr S. N. Gavade, A.P.P. for the State. in Appln.No. 3206/2010 ----- CORAM:- A.R. JOSHI, J. DATE :- 11th August, 2010. 2appln-3203-10 group P.C.:- 1. None for the applicant in all four applications for anticipatory bail The applicant is facing charge under section 379 of Indian Penal Code for theft of different motor vehicles. 2. Earlier on 22.7.2010 all applications were before this Court. That time the applicant was absent. On that day, upon request on behalf of the State, directions were given that the applicant should remain present before the Court by the adjourned date. That time it was revealed that the present applicant was also involved in similar type of car theft cases in Bangalore and when he was in custody in the said matter he knew regarding the present four cases registered against him by different police stations at Mumbai. For the sake of ready reference, it may be mentioned that the present applicant is asking for pre-arrest bail in four crimes registered with Park Site, Amboli, Mulund and Rabale Police Stations. In each of the matter, different vehicles of different makes were stolen and offences were initially registered against the unknown thief. 3. The order dated 22.7.2010 directing the applicant to remain present before the Court was not complied. Even the learned Advocate and the applicant both remained absent on 29.7.2010. However, another Advocate, Mr Pande, holding for an Advocate for the 3appln-3203-10 group applicant prayed for adjournment and as such matter was kept on today’s date. Today also none present in all four matters. In view of this position, all four applications are dismissed and accordingly disposed of. (A.R.JOSHI,J) LRS-PA