n.v l^. '&rA: :l'%3^--- c • t5N^! F -l0 l, 0 Rt;1'!"''^ &J, ^.^•%..w^ sje, <) <(f "-f' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Petitioner Respondents I^J^I W.P.NO. .-L'yS. / 2006- ^ Bhagtu Ekka S/o Sukhi Ekka Aged about 45 Years, Occ.- Principal, Kirodimal Nagar Higher secondary school R/o Rambhata Raigarh,Tah. 8s Didtt._ Raigarh (C.G.) Versus / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through:-The Secretary, School Education, Departinent, Mantralaya, D.S.K. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) y 2. Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Through:- The Secretary, ShanKar Nagar Road, Raipur (C.G.). 'PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 'T T XI-HC-22 SD^I^T W\* 3f^?l a?Rwnf?a l^ 'S^I -i|Wld<<, ^Til^lii. facll'M'i,''- Q vwn 5hii<» . i^P^M&.O^^t'o, ra» ' WT 200 sn^i ?^irat'fffta 23-1-2006 wrillten Shri Vineet Pandey, Shri S.P. Kale, Govt. Ad Heard. -The question ralsed in of Deputy Director and DIETf fhat in fhe examination, kiterviews were held and for not fixed. AU these potnts have tji (W.P. -No. 599/2005 Mohan of Chhattisgarh and others; been decided bv thls court b^ 2005. This Court formulated pertinent point sought to b^ point No. 5 which is as unde| codiisel for fhe petitioner. jvocate for the State. piis petition is about selection (F'rincipal). The contention is test was not held and only tiolding interviews, criteria was "l7(5). Whether the adopted by the Pyblic); was unproper aad meritorious candidatesl interview." The discussion finds fc 22.4 ofthe order. After exanliintn ^Plfeiqh •WRtf4 fezt ^n?K ^? srfSgir sn^r fcen raised in a batch of cases Ljal Jaiswal and others -v- State gjnd other petitions), which have a common order dated 16-11- |}ouits in paragraph 17 and the canvassed tn this petitipn is method of selection Service Commission illegal and the less have been selected in lace from paragraph 22.1 to tlie refevant matenal on [4^'^rt XJ-HC-22 sn^r^ R-ti.ch Sf^ sBii<»w?a 1- -^x' -s^d •^|*IM<I> »fll*i'is.fai'ii'uy *<fflPfrgiWBR.LO.'P../V,6. f75/^('?06 "V^ 200 311^1 ^tITSR ^fttT record, the Court in para 22. selection adopted by the Pu1 order. Besides this, the parties. The persons who hav joined as party. petitio^er has not joined the proper' been selected have not'been Therefore in view of th' 599/2005 (Mohan Lal Jaisi Chhattisgarh and others) de stands disposed of. Consequently, M.W.P. disposed of. <»i|t([<n<i)i 414cil'^ fst^ TT»ltril< ^T 3TpgtT snt^I p has held that the process of Wc Service Commission is in t decision passed in W.P. No. t?al and others -v- State of .ted 16-11-2005, this petition No, 16-4/2006 also stands Sd'- Fakhruddin Judge [Tft^^R^