IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 3486 of 2009 Date of Decision: 4.8.2009 Darshan Singh and another ....Petitioners. Versus Dhrum Singh and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. S.C. Chhabra, Advocate for the petitioners. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. In this revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the plaintiff-petitioners have challenged the order dated 11.10.2008 passed by the trial court whereby the application filed by them under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure for injunction was dismissed and on appeal thereagainst, that order was affirmed by the lower appellate court vide order dated 29.5.2009. The courts below while declining the interim injunction to the plaintiff-petitioners have observed that the plaintiff-petitioners had not been able to prima facie show that they were in possession of khasra No. 744. Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon the demarcation report as well as on the report of the Local Commissioner and other documents but the same do not establish that the aforesaid observation recorded by the courts below is C.R. No. 3486 of 2009 -2- illegal or perverse in any manner. Accordingly, there is no error in the orders impugned herein passed by the courts below which may warrant interference by this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Dismissed. Nothing observed in this order shall be construed to be an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. August 4, 2009 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE