IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER MONDAY, THE 11TH OCTOBER 2010 / 19TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 30084 of 2010(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MANDAKINIAMMA.P.G., AGED 78 YEARS, W/O. PARAMESWARAN NAIR, PERUPARAMBU KAROTTU VEETTIL, NEENDOOR, ONAMTHURUTH.P.O., ONAMTHURUTHU VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686602. BY ADV. SRI.PAUL JACOB SRI.K.R.MURALI SRI.PEARL K.DAVIS SRI.I.K.RAJU SRI.M.A.ANZAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. NEENDOOR GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REP. BY SECRETARY, NEENDOOR-686602. (VIA) ETTUMANOOR, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT, TRIVANDRUM PIN-695001. 3. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT, GOVT. OF KERALA,TRIVANDRUM-695.39 BY SPL.GOVT.PLEADER (LOCAL SELF GOVT.) SRI.C.M.SURESH BABU. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: A.K. Basheer, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C). No. 30084 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 11th day of October, 2010 Judgment Petitioner is stated to be a resident of Ward No.5 in Neendoor Panchayat. According to her, the road by the side of which her residence is situated is a public road starting from Onamthuruthu-Kurumulloor PWD road. She further states that more than 10 houses are situated on either side of this road. But her grievance is that the said road is being totally ignored by the Panchayat and a private road which leads to the private property of one Hareesharan is being tarred utilising the funds of the Panchayat. Petitioner further alleges that the said Hareesharan is a very influential person and it is because of this influence that the Panchayat is misutilising the public funds. 2. Learned special Govt. Pleader for Local self-Govt. Institutions submits after getting instructions from respondent Nos.2 and 3 that the entire allegations in the writ petition are totally incorrect. The alleged public road has not come into the possession of the Panchayat so far. On the contrary, the road allegedly leads to the private WPC.30084/20210. : 2 : property of Mr.Hareesharan is vested in the Panchayat. The said road is being repaired/tarred utilising the funds of the Panchayat on the basis of the decision taken by the District Planning Committee. 3. Having perused the averments in the writ petition, I am not at all satisfied that the petitioner is entitled to get any relief in the writ petition. Though this is clearly an abuse of process of the Court, I refrain from imposing cost considering the age of the petitioner. Writ Petition is dismissed. A.K. Basheer Judge. an.