^^>9"'::......^"\ 6 ^voy ....-'*" BEFORE C^ Ifcps HON»BLE HIGH o Sl CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. <, COURT OF W.P. (S) No...<S).vl.$.......2011 J'BTITIONER -^ RESPONDENTS Ganesh Prasad Khariya S/o Bhur Ram Khariya age 56 years Head Master posted at Middle School Sapnai Block Raigarh District Raigarh C.G. VERSUS (1) ^ The State Govt. of Chhattishgarh, Through - The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) (2) District Education Officer, Raigarh District Raigarh C.G. WRIT PETSTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR fSSUANCE OF WRTT OR MANDAMUS/DIRECTiON QF QTHER APPROPR8ATE WRIT. -v^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTJSGARH : BILASPUR Sinale Bench: Hon'bie Shri Manindra IVJohan Shrivastava, 4 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRST PETITiON (S) N0.3145»'2011 Ganesh Prasad Khariya Versus State of Chhattisgarh and Another PETSTION ARTiCLE 228 OF THE CONSSTUTION OF Present: - Shri Ajay Shrivastava, counse! for the petltioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panei Lawyer for the State. ORALORDER (Passedon 20th June, 2011) The initialiy appointed as Teacher on -a pay of Rs.100/". compietion of his period, he pay scaleofRs. 169-300/-. 2 . Learned counse! appearing for the petitioner submitted that the issue involved in the is as to whether the petitioner is entitled to reguiar pay wjth from the of initiai appointment or coniipletion of period. 3. The issue invotved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribuna!, Jabaipur Jn O.A.No.2745A89 Yadu an^ 56 i< ofM.P. & wherein it'was that the sioiilarly are to regular pay effect from the of initjal appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The by the Hon'bie Supreme Court upholding the decision of '^^^' —2_. .A ^ the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to reguEar pay scale from the date of initiai appointment. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submits that this Court, while considering the same issue in Amat- Sai Ram & Others v. of Chhattisgarh & Others, VW.P.(S5.No.4725/2006. by order 01-09-2006, aliowed the petitioners to make a representation within a period of ten days, raising aii the grievances. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is granted iiberty to make a representation raising all grievances in light of the aforestated judgment and the circuiar dated 05-01-2011 (Annexure P-5) and in turn, the concerned respondent is directed to decide the representation, if any, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation, subject to verjfication of the facts. 6. in view ofthe foregoing, this petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Manindra IVIohan Shrivastava Judge