~"^i v's^ ^. <'•• ^ ^ *,<' s ^••;%^ HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR "V &.M.P. N0. 612/2011 PBTITIOBNI^ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. VERSUS NON-APPLICANT Mahadev Kaushik S/o Budhawa Kaushik, aged about 58 years, Smt. Rambha Kaushik W/o Shri Mahadev Kaushik, Aged aboKt 50 years, Rekha Kaushik, D/o Mahadev Kaushik, Aged about 25 years, Kavita Kuashik, D/o Mahadev Kaushik aged about 18 years, Ravi kausluk, S/o Jhumuk Lal Kaushik, aged about 44 years, Rajkumar Kshatdya S/o SuMidev Kshatriya, aged about 43 years, Chitrarekha, W/o GaugacaBi, aged 23 years, AU. R/o no. 1 to 6 aie Puraiu Sarkaada, Lodhipaia, P.S. & Distt. Bilaspur, S6 no. 7 is R/o Tifra, P.S. Civil Liae, TahsU & Distt. Bflaspur (C.G.). State of Chliatfegarh Through S.H.O. P.S. Tarbahar, District Bilaspur (C.G.). APPUCATION UNDBR SECTION 482 OF THB CODE OF CiaMIMAL PROCEDURE. (SB :Hon'bie Mr. T.P.Shanna, J.) Presenfc- Shri Saurabh Dangi, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Vinod KumarTekam, P.L. for the State/respondent. ORDER 2. (Passedon 21/09/2011) By this petition imder Section 482 of fhe Code of Cnnunal Procedure for modi&cation offhe order dated 27/6/201l passed ia M.Cr. C. (A) No. 374/2011. Leamed counsel for the petitioners submits that while grantiag bail in. fhe cvent ofarrest to fhe petitioners it is directed fhat order shaU remaia effective till fUuig of the chai^e sheet. Present petitioners bave filed regular bail application before the trial Court and before ttus Court but in absence of aay liberty to file regutar bafl this .A°^ ^- ll ^ Court iu M.Cr.C. No. 2641/2011 has dismissed theappIicatiDn as not luamteinable therefore, suitable xnodification is necessaiy. 3. After passing of the order dated 6/9/2011 in M.Cr. C. No. 2641/2011, I do not find any ground for modification. Consequently, petition is Uable to be dtenussed and is hereby disuiissed. However, considering fhe fact fhat baU uuder Section 438 of the Code of Crtminal Procedure, 1973 has been granted to the petitioners, it is directed fhat if petitioners file application under Section 439 ofthe Code ofCrunuial Procedure, 1973 in. due course after filmg ofthe chai^e-sheet then ifpossible trial Court or Court conceraed shaU consider aud decide the same on samc day. Sd/- T.P.Sharma Judge w