IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.1885 of 2008 Between: Gaddam Hari Swamy Adopted, S/o. G. Nagalingam, R/o. Cherlopally Village, Owk Mandal, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Special Collector, SRBC, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 2 The Special Deputy Collector, -cum-LAO, SRBC, Nandyal, Kurnool District. 3 The Superintending Engineer, SRBC Circle-II, Owk Region, SRBC Colony, Nandyal, Kurnool District. 4 The Executive Engineer, SRBC Circle-II & III, Kurnool District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not paying compensation to the built up area to an extent of 121.95 Sq.Mtrs and varandah area to an extent of 32.33 sq.mtrs in open place area of the petitioner situated at Cherlopally Village, Owk Mandal, Kurnool District by paying compensation to the built up ara existing in H.No. 1-1, 1-1-1 etc, situated in the same village belonging to other claimants in the notification dt. 28-8-2005 published in Local News Papers as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and consequently direct the respondents to determine the compensation that has to be paid to the existing built up area of 121.095 sq.mtrs and Varandah area 32.33 sq.mts in open place area 164.64 sq.meters in H.No. 2-91/1 situated at Cherlopally Village, Owk Mandal, Kurnool District of the petitioner and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.SUBBA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4: GP FOR IRRIGATION The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication as of today. Recording the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 05.03.2009 va