IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3548 of 2008 MD.FAIYAZ & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 16/09/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Case has been registered under sections 363, 366, 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code in which there is allegation that the informant’s minor grand daughter was taken away from the house by Kudus Mian and subsequently she was seen with the petitioners and others and since then the victim is traceless. Submission is that the victim is living at Delhi and the petitioners have no concern. The fact remains that the victim is still traceless and the petitioners have been seen going with the victim who is a minor girl. Report has been received from the court below and according to the report, the court has taken time limit of eight months for disposal of the case. Considering the above facts, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected for the present. However, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail in the court below after completion of eight months or after recovery of victim which ever is earlier in time. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)