-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.675 OF 2004 APPEAL NO.675 OF 2004 APPEAL NO.675 OF 2004 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Mr.A.M.Khairdi h/f Mr.V.B.Naik for the Appellants CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: AUGUST 7, 2006. AUGUST 7, 2006. AUGUST 7, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate for the Appellants. The Appellants are the original Plaintiffs. The Appellants filed a suit on the basis that the firm is dissolved and the Respondents are liable to pay certain amount to them. In the alternative a prayer was made for passing a decree of dissolution of the firm and accounts. The Trial Court passed a decree for dissolution of partnership and accounts and the decree has been confirmed in Appeal preferred by the Appellants herein. 2. Both the courts below have recorded a concurrent finding of fact by which the -2- case of the Appellants regarding settlement of the accounts has been negatived. The findings of fact are based on appreciation of oral and documentary evidence on record. There is no perversity in the said findings. The Appellants are sufficiently protected by passing the decree of dissolution of partnership firm and for accounts. No substantial question of law arises. Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Judge. Judge. Judge.