IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 11698 of 1999 Between: Vitta Venkateswarlu S/o. Venkataiah R/o. J.B.Krishnapuram Village, Bestavaripeta Mandal, Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Land Revenue, Office of the Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, A.P., Nampally, Hyderbad. 2 The Joint Collector Prakasam District, Ongole. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer Markapur, Prakasam District. 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer Bestavaripeta Mandal, Prakasam District. 5 Jalapati Venkamma W/o. Pedakasaiah R/o. J.B.Krishnapuram Village, Bestavaripeta Mandal, Prakasam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction under Art.226 of the Constitution of India and declare the proceedings of the 1st respondent made in Procgs.No.BCW3/381/96, dt: 15/3/1999 as violative of principles of natural justice and of Article 14 of the constitution of India and as arbitrary and illegal and non est in the eye of law and consequently direct the respondents herein to grant the petitioner patta for land measuring to an extent of Ac.2.10 cents in Survey No.7/8 of J.B.Krishnapuram Village, Bestavaripeta Mandal, Prakasam District, by upholding the action of the Mandal revenue Oﬃcer,Bestavaripeta Mandal, Prakasam District, in having granted to the petitioner assigned patta for the said land through his Proceeding No.F.Dis.DK.No.7/1404, dt: 10/8/1994 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.T.M.PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following Order: Since none appeared for the petitioner on 12-08-2008, the writ petition was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, neither the counsel for the petitioner is present nor is there any representation on his behalf. Hence the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J Dt:21-08-2008 Usd To 1 The Commissioner of Land Revenue, Office of the Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, A.P., Nampally, Hyderbad. 2 The Joint Collector Prakasam District, Ongole. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer Markapur, Prakasam District. 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer Bestavaripeta Mandal, Prakasam District. 5 Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 6 Two CD copies.