"y- ' ^. ^ ^ .^« C^i^s) 13i3/°5 ^' BEEORB THE ST^eEAE»CCNISTRA2I^E TRIBTOM* M^Po AT ( .. . TXBM^ua*. • • " • •" • RE£a?©NDEKTS» • 1 o ©•A<m < ^Q C" ^-^, /1996 HaE-i.Ilaia Dwiv^i S/@. Shrl..Na3tdran ©iriT^dt^.]^ ,occ^patiOB ©y®I^aboyr €3@maissi@n©r^, CSihatei^garli Regi©n^ Raipur (M«P<,)« Versus State e£ M<»P< 'through th@ Seer@teaacY». ©epa^tmeBte@f Labo^^ Maatrals^a? • Bfoopal<» . - Stoci N,K<» Tiwaet, %r<? Labo^r; @ffi©e'©iteh©Leteour Qosmi.sslQneXe XGdoreo Stssi V»Ko Dsato^-^ BGf. L^@iar"<30EWBtssi.©nes?tf OSfice-©fthe 0©siimissi@BerLabour^. I^dorcft APPL£GA®NUNDE& ©ECI*I@N 19 €!El THE ABMIMM¥RA3?W2 SRIBUSiM.S AC£» 1985s • 2* 3» K ^. Go-wri HIGH COIJRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR APPLICANT WRIT PETITION (S) No. 1313 of2005 Hari Ram Dwivedi. RESPONDE^7TS VERSUS State ofM.P. & others. SB: Hon'ble Sliri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Prcscnt: None ±brthe petitioner. Sliri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyerforihc State. rORAL) (Passed on 17th day of November, 2009) The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor any represeatation is made cn behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuinR the matter. In view ofthe above, the matter is dismissed fbr want ofprosecirtion. Registrv7 is directed to send a copy ofthis order to the petitioner, forthwith. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge