IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9733 of 2005 MAHESH NARAYAN PANDEY son of late Ramautar Pandey, resident of village-Dhigoar, P.O.- Samaila, P.s.Keoti Districtr-Darbhaga Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Building, Patna. 2. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Building, Patna. 3. The District Superintendent of Education, Madhubani. 4. The Director, Govt. Provident Fund, Directorate of Provident Fund, Pant Bhawan, Patna. 5. The District Provident Fund Officer, Madhubani. 6. The Treasury Officer, Madhubani. ----------- 4 06.04.2010 Heard Mr. Sunil Kumar Karn, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Shashi Shekhar Prasad Sinha, learned A.C. to G.P.9 for the State. The petitioner superannuated from the post of Headmaster, Government Primary School, Mohanpur, (Pandaul), District-Madhubani with effect from 28.2.1995. Although the petitioner received his other post retiral benefits but the amount towards provident fund was not paid to him giving rise to the present writ petition. A counter affidavit was filed on behalf of the District Provident Fund Officer, Madhubani and who submitted that the delay was 2 attributable to the District Superintendent of Education, Madhubani. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the District Superintendent of Education, Madhubani today, in course of the proceeding and in which it has been stated that the amount of Rs. 93,801/- has been forwarded to the Treasury, Madhubani for onward payment to the petitioner towards his G.P.F. dues. It is further stated that so far the period prior to November, 1976 is concerned, the amount of Rs. 10,503/- has been paid to the petitioner vide authorization dated 17.9.2007, copy of the authorization together with calculation chart has been enclosed to the counter affidavit. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that there are no details as regarding the calculation of the amount of Rs. 93,801/- Having regard to the circumstances that admissible dues of the G.P.F. as according to the respondents, has been paid to the petitioner, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and the same is disposed of with the direction to the District Superintendent of Education, 3 Madhubani and the District Provident Fund Officer, Madhubani, to provide to the petitioner a detailed calculation chart containing deductions and calculation of interest thereon right from the date of appointment on 25.2.1958 until the date of disbursement, within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. In case the petitioner is dissatisfied by the calculation of the G.P.F. amount, he is at liberty to raise his grievance before the authority concerned and which shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law.. Bibhash (Jyoti Saran, J. )