IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 857 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 857 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 857 OF 2007 Janardan ravikrishna Masukar.... Petitioner versus M/s. Konkan Agencies...... Respondent. Shri B.G.Tangsali for the petitioner CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 9TH JULY, 2007 DATED; 9TH JULY, 2007 DATED; 9TH JULY, 2007 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. The present petitioner is original defendant who has challenged the order passed by the trial court rejecting the amendment application. The respondent/plaintiff has instituted a suit for recovery of Rs. 24,668/-. The present petitioner filed written statement and at a later stage also amended the same. The suit came to be partly decreed. Against the judgment and decree, the petitioner filed an appeal and the appellate court has remanded the matter to the trial court for fresh decision. After the remand again the petitioner moved an application for amendment objecting to the teritorial jurisdcition of the trial court. The trial court has rejected the said application and it is this order that is challenged by the present writ petition. It is evident that the suit is of the year 1997 and the objection to the teritorial jurisdiction is raised in the year 2006 which cannot be permitted. 2. Perused the impugned order. It does not call for any interference. Hence writ petiiton is summarily dismissed. ....