1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.W. No.1114/2010 in Writ Petition No.2453/2007 ( Dashraj Vivandas Arora ..V/s.. The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary & others ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. R.Z. Mirza,, counsel for applicant. Mr. J.B. Jaiwal, A.G.P. for respondent nos.1 to 3. Mr. M.P.Khajanchi, counsel for respondent no.4. CORAM : D.D. SINHA & F.M. REIS JJ. DATE : 29 th APRIL, 2010 . Heard Mr. Khajanchi, learned Counsel for the applicant/respondent no.4, Mr. Mirza, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jaiswal, learned A.G.P. for respondent nos.1 to 3. Civil Application No.1114/2010 is moved by the applicant/respondent no.4 Municipal Council for extension of time for complying with the directions issued by this Court vide order dated 5.8.2009 passed in Writ Petition No.2453/2007 whereby Municipal Council was directed to release the amount of leave encashment along with interest at the rate of 10% from 22.2.2006 in favour of the petitioner. Similarly, the petitioner was given liberty to move application for commutation of pension and other 2 benefits and the Municipal Council was directed to decide the same in accordance with law on or before 31.3.2010. Mr. Khajanchi, learned Counsel for the applicant, states that for the reasons stated in the civil application, the said order could not be complied with within the stipulated period and assures this Court that same would be complied with if further period of four months from today is granted. Shri Mirza, learned Counsel for the petitioner, objects for grant of further time on the ground that the petitioner retired from service way back in the year 2004 and is still waiting for the pensionary benefits and going through financial hardship. It is no doubt true that the Municipal Council ought to have complied with the order within the stipulated period and the petitioner must be going through a lot of financial hardship. However, by way of last chance, we grant four months' extension to the Municipal Council to comply with the directions issued by this Court vide order dated 5.8.2009 with the clear understanding that no further time shall be granted for this purpose. With these observations and directions, the civil application is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Tambaskar.