?^^SSS^&c-S8'S^£S.Sss!SS^^^S. f^^®^@^^^®s^^^i^^^^K^^ s» iss sies 6f SABSTA fSABSSa AT JABJiLPVS fSlf PSIIfSOS ^8«2>@?s> ». 5. J. ^-i,. 6, Tapas SwKor Pal S/e Sas-tnSpaneth fal resident of SheJt»ara,Tak8-t2 Katghara Satyapritkaah Psendsy S/o Sormsshwar' fanSey r/o Bhejtnarttt Tahsil SatyhQt& AwaSh Xtshere PrasadS/a fanSlctshore Presad r/o Sltejinarss S'ahstl fatffhero Sajesh Kumar Sharwa S/e Batjnath Sharsa r/o She^tnaratrtiksil Katghora y Tqpa»_Ku»arffafta llan af ^fttRdra fefteit Bitks tlsa»»Sar rf'ft Bhej'tnsra, fsthstl Kalfehere / Praotr rumar Oey S/e Ghtttarcmjan Sey r/o SSteJtnarafTahstl KittshoPit Amardeep Sharsa S/o ShaKti Ku»sr Sharma S/o Bhe./tnara,fshstl fstfhQra Ashtah KS»SF Bana S/o Sansieksr Bhana 5/®Shejinsra,rah8il Katffhors Teatal Sanerjee S/e ^tvan Krtahss Sanerjee &IQ Bheftnaf'StTatstj. fatghors Tedbhuahan S/Q Bbapal PrsSaS SvtweSi ff/o ShejtneracTahsil tatyohra, (Sveryene lsef the Stlaspur Btstrtet ef S»P«) •»••»• »*»Pe'Sitiesers ^-^A v er au s ':fl:S*—r~~^-s^ ^^^^-^_v^ "^ s'l»^^.'a ffftairaes-cBS Kanaging Btrecterf :^y% ' SQuih Sastem Ooal_.fielda ttmtteS ~Saa^BUASfffS' "'» S\w ' A St ^°9"~ •'WS^ Seuth I'fc^ ifeant^ '^ ifanager,KQrf»a ^rea of CoalfielSe Mmtteel Xorba GaJlteryf Stat.BilaapurdtvPf} ISIT PSTITIQS BU S3S af S'SS eOKSXITmiOK flr ISBIA. JPtWIOSttSS 6F TSS PSSTJriOf 0»»fAWJWi^aS W TSB PSTIFIOSSaS ^lpsrt froxthe ts/er»ettioH9 draos <» tfctf cause tttle the pettttaners are the IsnS oustees ef the Ignds esyutrea »»Satith Sssters CoalfteISs itmited Stlaajier fer mtninff purposes tn JTorSa .Ar»e« eont»s2 ^ i^ iB.sEiias^ffiIiaa HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No, 3&73 ofl996 Petitioners Tapas Kuinar Pal & others Versus Respondents Chairman-cziin-Managing Director, Soufh Eastem Coalfields Limited & aaother Sin^e Bench : Hon'bk Mr. Justice Satish K. Apiihotri. None for the petitioners. Shri N. Naha Roy, counsel for the respoiidents. ORAL ORDER (15dlJune,2006) The foUowiag order of fhe Court was passed by Satish K. Agaihotri, J. The laatter is catled for hearing twice. On both the occasions, none appears nor any represeiitation is inade on behalfoffhe petitioners. In view of the above, thc petition stands dismissed for want ofprosecution. Satisfe K. Agnjhotri iyh\n