....... • ( 26, 27 & 28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1350/2010 AND RAMNAN RAGHAVENDRAN & ORS ..... Petitioner Through Ms. Indu Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivek Jain, Advocate versus STATE & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Pawan Bahl, APP for the State. Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Adv. for R-2. + CRL.M.C. 1713/2010 AND NARENDRA JHA VERI &ORS. .. ... Petitioner Through Ms. Indu Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivek Jain, Advocate versus STATE & ANR. .. ... Respondent Through Mr. Pawan Bahl, APP for the State. Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Adv. for R-2. + CRL.M.C. 2832/2010 o/o KUNNASAGARAN CHINNIAH & ORS ..... Petitioner Through Ms. Indu Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivek Jain, Advocate versus STATE & ANR .... Respondent Through Mr. Pawan Bahl, APP for the State. Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER 18.05.2011 Status report has been filed by the State; the same is taken on record. Learned APP for the State states that a closure report has been filed in FIR No. 27 /2009 under Sections 420/409/506/120B/34 IPC registered at P.S. Signing Date:29.08.2024 17:09:50 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified Saraswati Vihar, New Delhi. After filing of the closure report, the Respondent No. 2 has filed an application under Section 156(3) and 173(8) seeking further investigation in the matter. The said application is posted for hearing on 1st August, 2011 before the learned Trial Court. Since the closure report has already been filed, learned counsel for the Petitioners states that he does not press the present petition at this stage with liberty to take remedies if so advised in case any adverse order is passed against the Petitioner. Petitions are dismissed with liberty as prayed for. MAY 18, 2011 'dk'