1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.W. NO. /2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3589/2010 (Shriram Gulab Shinde & others VERSUS State of Mah. & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri V.K. Gulhane, counsel for the petitioners. Shri A.M. Deshpande, A.G.P. for the R-1. Shri A.D. Mohgaonkar, counsel for the R-3. Shri N.B. Bargat, counsel for the R-4 to 7. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATE : JUNE 16 , 2011 . The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted the application for grant of permission to delete the names of respondent nos.4, 5, 6 and 7, in the Court today. The same is accepted on record. The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to delete the names of respondent nos.4, 5, 6 and 7 from the array of respondents. The learned counsel for the respondents do not have any objection for the prayer made in the civil application. The prayer made in the civil application is granted. The petitioner is permitted to delete the names of respondent nos.4, 5, 6 and 7 from the array of respondents. The necessary amendment should be carried out forthwith. The civil application is allowed and disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE APTE 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3589/2010 (Shriram Gulab Shinde & others VERSUS State of Mah. & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri V.K. Gulhane, counsel for the petitioners. Shri A.M. Deshpande, A.G.P. for the R-1. Shri A.D. Mohgaonkar, counsel for the R-3. Shri N.B. Bargat, counsel for the R-4 to 7. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATE : JUNE 16 , 2011 . The petitioners have approached this Court for several directions to the respondent nos.2 and 3 in regard to the issuance of certificate of Project Affected Persons to the petitioner nos.2 and 3 and restraining the respondents from appointing the respondent nos.4 to 7 on the posts, which were earmarked for the Project Affected Persons. The petitioners have, however, deleted the respondent nos.4 to 7 from the array of respondents and due to their deletion, according to the learned counsel for the petitioners, the only prayer that survives in this writ petition is Prayer Clause ii). Hence, by this petition, the petitioner merely seeks a direction to the respondent no.2, the District Rehabilitation Officer, to issue certificate of Project Affected Persons to the petitioner nos.2 and 3, after making enquiry in regard to the claim made by them. It appears that during the pendency of this petition, this Court had, by an order dated 15.03.2011, directed the respondent-Collector to condier the 3 grant of certificates to the petitioner nos.2 and 3 in accordance with law. The writ petition can be conveniently disposed of with a direction to the respondent-Collector/District Rehabilitation Officer to consider the case of the petitioner nos.2 and 3 for grant of Project Affected Persons Certificate, in accordance with law. Hence, the Collector-District Rehabilitation Officer is directed to consider the claim of the petitioner nos.2 and 3 for grant of certificate of Project Affected Persons and decide the same in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE APTE