^i^^^iNil;"?^^i^^^^^ ^ yy^. HIGHCtWKrOg.RJDIGATUREA'EBILASPtJR.G.G, WMT PETTnON N(^ (i572( rfe,Bencii PETITIONERS ^ ^§^ ^s-' ^^y .^*' -<^ ^^ v I) RamSai, S/o Gendi, aged about65 years, caste Rajwar, R/o Village Odgi, police station Jhilmift Tahsil SurajpUF, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) 2) Rajau, S/& Ramdhart, aged about 64 yeais, Ri'o ViBage Paldanouli, poHce statKMi JhiImiE, Talsil SaEajpur, Distt. SurgHja (C.G.) VERSUS 8ESP(»®ENT!S t) Jaipil, &^> ShrfSimidarSai, aged about 45 yesas, caste Goo^ R/& villa^ PaMaBauli, Tahsa Sina;pur, Distt.Surgtga(»C,G^ 2) Member of Boacd of Rewnoe, Bilaspur (OG.) 3) CoBecfor Suruja, Distt. StB'guja 4) S.D.O. (Revenue) Surajur, Distt. Sin^uja (C.G.) . ^) StateofChhattisgarh.tiirotigh Secretaiy, Reveime Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) vmrr pETEFK^tmi»^Aia'icix22!6ffl^M'BiiEC5GiNsmn'CTio!^ WWA^ / ' - ^ ^...^-.-..--.-^. 1) PartieuIareofthepetitieBers : As mentioned iathscausetitleabovfc XI-HC-22 aiRSi'^1 R-ii* s^ft sbMI'* UU 'y' "-•<; • ';£ '3's? '^IRl?R,. ^•dl*lil<»,^cll'M'l'l. ^ WRCTI ShlltB 3ff^?T T^K, _....te'.<)..ASM4.....Wl. 20Q3 ist^s' sii^r'Rdiw^fet WlfepjN -TO^ 4 feft Tf3R?1T ^?<RNII3:(I^T 12.09.ao03 Shri A.K. Sbiikla, coiuis^ 1 for the petitioners. Shri Raubir Siagb:, qovt. Advocate for the Stale / respondent no.3 to 5. By this petition uiider Ailticles 226 & 227 ofCoastitution of -1 '" ^ •- : ^ ^ - • -- -' — -- . India, fb.e petitioner seeks to cliaUeiige fhe order-dafed 05.08.2003 passed by respoijdent no.2- Board of Revenue by w.hieli the stay application oftl^e petitioner has been rejccted. Facts leadiag to filing (|if this writ petition are that the petitioner liereia purchased a permission fi-om. tlie CoUector ^ Revenue Code and siiice then t piece of laad adineasuring 8.64 acres ia the year 1967 by a i^gistered sale-deed after obtai-ntng s per the provisions of M.P. Laad tie petitipners are in possession of the land. Tlie Halka Patwari ^nade a complaint before the Sub, Divisional Officer iu fhe year 'l |1997 and after enquity the Si Divisional Officer turaed dow^i fhe coiuplam.f of the Patwan. Tbereafter, respondent no.l- J^ipal son of fhe seUer Siuider Sai filed anappeal before ttie CoIIe| vide its order dated 30.06.200i ;tor and on appeal; the CoUector 3 ,set aside fhe order 6f the Sub Divisional Officer^au.d ordered) &r retum. 6f th^ laad to fhe respondent no. 1. i Against the revision petition which is pend^ng before the Board of Revenue. However, the Board of Revenue the petitioner. , Leamed couasel for the said order fhe petlttion.er ffled a rejected the stay apRJication of petitioners submits 'fhat if fhe possession of thc land is dclivcjred to thc rcspo?idcnt no. l' thcn ^ ::- ^-—- •j: ...,,.,,!——^•i^te'—' XI-HC-22 'S'sf 'iilillcl''), »fl1'M<is, facii'yy sn^TW R-li* ail^l ?n*ii<^ ^lf^) PuSl<^jr. H!*<CTI giWb sn^r "q^? ^.;..^.<R.M^.S..|.»WI. 200J ^S^St' STI^TTRIIWtte pe|titi' ye^r the purpbse offiling revision ttie laud ia question was haviug due consideration aadi fi-oiu fhe CoUector ia fhe contuiuiag ia the possession I liave heard the leamed Haviug heard the leanif haying regard to tUe facts aa^l llaying regard to the iiiatenlal pennission was granted by the the Revenue Boa.rd should petitioners wiftim a period pf fee^ ttie possessiQirofth&petrtioner WitB (Uls 'observation stands disposed of. I.A. NQ.8520/-2003 alsostand Certified copy as per Rule^ ch1^?Pft;i HW^ ^ T^^Jl •(.r<i<s^< i? srfsaq aii^r pejtition will be fi-ustrated. Moreover, pL(rchased by the—petitionersafter aflter obtainiag valid permission 1967 arid the petitioners are ofpand in question siace fhen. (jounsel for the parties. id counsel for the parties and an^l circumstances of the case aud before this Court. fhat the Ifhen CoUector, it is directed that ;ci4e flie revision petition. ffled by the :m6nths jB-om today and till then fehouM not disturbed. du'eetions, fhis writ petition pi^iitfy, M.W.P. No.260 iy 2003 and ^isposed of ; attd Sd/- "C.Bhadoo ^ ^udge