IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 11075 of 2008. Decided on: 23.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Rameshwar Sharma. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. L.N. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): Petitioner claims that he was appointed in the year 1991 and has completed ten years service with 240 days in each calendar year. This position is not disputed in the reply filed by the respondents. 2. Consequently, the petition is allowed with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for conferment of work-charged status immediately after completion of 10 years service since he has been appointed before 31.12.1993 in view of the principles laid down by their Lordships of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Mool Raj Upadhyaya versus State of H.P. and others, 1994 Supp.(2) SCC, 316 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - and State of Himachal Pradesh and others versus Gehar Singh, (2007) 12 SCC, 43, within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner, with all consequential benefits. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 23, 2010. (sck).