((-1-)) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.629 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.8309 OF 2005 Ganpat Bhiva Pande Applicant versus State of Maharashtra Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.622 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.7505 OF 2005 Ashok Dattaram Pande Applicant versus State of Maharashtra Respondent Shri P.A.Pol, APP present. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 13th September 2006 PC : 1. These applications were placed on board yesterday but none has appeared in support of the same. They were adjourned till today. 2. One of the application was specifically listed for today. None has appeared for the applicants in support of the prayer for relaxation of the condition imposed while enlarging the applicants on bail. ((-2-)) 3. That apart, it is pointed out to me that the trial has commenced but it is not true that the witnesses from the concerned village, whose limits the applicants are restrained from entering, have already been examined. 4. It is pointed out that only the prosecutrix (PW-1) has been examined and her cross examination is inconclusive. The other witnesses have yet to step into the witness box. In such circumstances these applications are premature and not maintainable. The applicants, therefore, will be at liberty to apply at a subsequent stage for the reliefs prayed herein. Both applications are rejected as premature with liberty as above. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)