IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.997 of 2010 Between: P. Khaja Bande Nawaz ..... PETITIONER AND The Joint Collector, Civil Supplies, Kurnool and three others ..... RESPONDENTS ORDER: Heard the learned counsel. 2. Sri K. Rajanna, the learned counsel representing the writ petitioner had pointed out to the prior orders made by this court and also the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies representing the respondents would maintain that the second respondent already had issued a show cause notice to the petitioner, for which an explanation had been submitted and in view of the facts and circumstances, the writ petition be disposed of directing the second respondent to complete the enquiry within a period of one month. 4. The Writ Petition is filed seeking a writ of Mandamus to declare the impugned actions of the third respondent in not receiving the D.Ds. for supply of essential commodities for the month of February 2010 to petitioner’s ration shop at Pedda Marriveedu village, Gonegandla Mandal, Kurnool district and manipulating the alleged statements by the fourth respondent said to be given by one Chinna Abdul, the uncle of the petitioner and some of the Card Holders of the petitioner’s ration shop on white blank papers by taking their signatures as illegal and further direct the third respondent to receive the D.Ds. for supply of essential commodities for the month of February, 2010 to the petitioner’s ration shop at Pedda Marriveedu village, Gonegandla mandal, Kurnool district as per the authorization issued by the second respondent is existing to the petitioner and pass such other suitable orders. 5. Several facts had been narrated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition and the interim order made in W.P.M.P.No.34421 of 2008 in W.P.No.26290 of 2008 and also the final order made in W.P.No.23997 of 2009 had been referred to. 6. This court is not inclined to express any opinion touching the merits and demerits. But, however, in the light of the facts and circumstances, let the Revenue Divisional Officer, Adoni - the second respondent complete the enquiry within a period of one month and till then let the petitioner be permitted to distribute the essential commodities. 7. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ P.S. NARAYANA, J January 27, 2010. Note: Issue operative portion by wire at party’s cost. B/o.Pn THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.997 of 2010 January 27, 2010 Note: Issue operative portion by wire at party’s cost. B/o.Pn