IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM THURSDAY, THE 25TH AUGUST 2011 / 3RD BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 37232 of 2009(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. RETNAKUMARI, AGED 36 YEARS, D/O. RAJAMMA, CHALUVILE PUTHUVAL PUTHEN BUNGLOW, KOTTAYATHUKONAM, KOTTAKAL DESOM, ANAVOOR VILLAGE. 2. JAYAKUMAR, AGED 34 YEARS, S/O. RAVEENDRAN, RESIDING AT -DO- 3. PUSHPA BAI, AGED 48 YEARS, D/O. RAJAMMA, NINU BHAVAN, VELLAMIDAKKUNNAVILE, KOTTAYATHUKONAM, KOTTAKAL DESAM, ANAVOOR VILLAGE. 4. JAYASEELA, AGED 48 YEARS, W/O. BABY, PANTHAPLAVILA VEEDU, VAZHUTHOOR DESOM, NEYYATINKARA VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.D.ROBINSON RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. R.O. VASANTHA KUMARI, AREA DEVELOPMENT SUPERVISOR, PANCHAYATH MEMBER, KOTTAKAL WARD, KIRAN BHAVAN, VARATTAYAM, KOTTAKKAL VILLAGE, ANAVOOR VILLAGE. 2. SAROJAM, AREA DEVELOPMENT SUPERVISOR (ADS), PANCHAYATH WORKER, KOTTAKKAL WARD, MOOVERLKKARA, KUNNATHUKAL PANCHAYATH, NEYYATINKARA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 3. SUNANTHA, PANCHAYATH WORKER, AREA DEVELOPMENT SUPERVISOR (ADS), KOTTAKKAL WARD, CHERUVALAKKODU, KUNNATHUKAL PANCHAYATH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 4. SMT. VASANTHA, AREA DEVELOPMENT SUPERVISOR (ADS), KOTTAKKAL WARD, AIKKATTIL, ANAVOOR VILLAGE. 5. SHRI. BHASKARA PILLAI, THENGUMTHOTTATHI VEEDU, KOTTAKKAL WARD, KUNNATHUKAL PANCHAYATH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 6. VIKRAMAN NAIR, S/O. NARAYANA PILLAI, CHERUVALAKKODU, KUNNATHUKAL PANCHAYATH, THIRUVANANTHAURAM DISTRICT. 7. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NEYYATINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 8. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VELLARADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 9. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VELLARADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP FOR R1TO4,5,6 SRI.V.VIJULAL FOR R1TO4,5,6 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPIN DAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No. 37232 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 25th day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. On behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioners an adjournment is sought for. We are not inclined to grant adjournment in this case where this court did not become incline to pass any interim order so far. Protection is sought in respect of the property as well as for the life of the petitioners. It is seen from the pleadings that in respect of the property a civil suit is pending. We decline protection sought in respect of the property on that reason. As for the protection sought in respect of life of the petitioner, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the party respondents that the party respondents do not intend to endager the life of the petitioners at all. We record the submission of the party respondents. We also notice that even without interim order, nothing happened to the lives of the petitioners so far. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM,JUDGE. dpk