IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.34034 of 2011 ====================================================== Rajesh Kumar Chaudhary .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== 2 14-10-2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case registered under Sections 323, 324, 379, 504, 147 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It is alleged against the petitioner and one Jai Shankar Choudhary to have taken Rs. 750/- from the shop of the complainant. It is also alleged against the petitioner that he resorted to firearm. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that since no injury was caused to the complainant, hence the cognizance was taken only under Sections 341, 323 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. The order sheet of the learned court below has been produced to the effect that summons were never served to the petitioner, though the cognizance was taken on 24.07.2006. The supplementary affidavit stipulates that the petitioner left the country on 21st of June, 2007. It is further submitted that the petitioner’s side also lodged a case against the complainant prior in time. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt/production of the order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st, Class, Muzaffarpur in connection with Complaint Case No. 2817 of 2005 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra Kumar/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)