IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR C.A.O.1531/2010 IN M.C.A. 19380/2010 SA.ST.10834/210 ARUN BHAKRE ..VS.. STATE OF MAH & 3 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or judges Orders. CORAM: SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE: 23 /12 / 2010 Heard Shri Chavhan, the learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Kadu, the learned counsel for the respondents. Though the learned counsel for the respondent opposes the prayer made in this civil application, for the reasons stated in the civil application, the delay in filing the restoration application is condoned. The civil application is allowed and disposed of. JUDGE M.C.A. ST 19380/2010 Heard Shri Chavhan, the learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Kadu, the learned counsel for the respondents. Though the learned counsel for the respondent opposes the prayer made in this civil application, for the reasons stated in the civil application and since the learned counsel states that the office objection has been removed and the certified copy of the memorandum of the first appeal has been filed, the prayer made in the civil application is granted. The M.C.A. is allowed and disposed of. The second appeal is restored to file. JUDGE SMP.