IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32265 of 2009 1. DEVENDRA RAWAT @ DEVENDRA PRASAD 2. VIKRAM RAWAT ALIAS VIKRAM KUMAR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR . 2 3.11.2009 Heard Counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing for the State. As submitted by the petitioners’ counsel the Opposite party no.2 is in a habit of instituting false cases against the petitioners, reference of which has been given in the anticipatory bail application. It is also submitted that all such cases have been finally ended in either submission of the final form or acquittal of the petitioners. Present case was also initially instituted by way of filing a complaint on the basis of which this case was directed to be instituted under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The police after investigation submitted final form to which a protest was filed by the informant which was treated as complaint case No.562 C of 2001. In the complaint/First Information Report allegation against petitioner no.1 is that he fired which did not hit anyone. Petitioner no.2 is said to be armed with lathi. Offence alleged is under Sections 147,148,323,452,380,384 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering these facts, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of above named petitioners is allowed. Let the petitioners surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Ist - 2 - Class, Jamui in connection with Complaint case No. 562C of 2001, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.Kumar