Criminal Misc. -M No. 19488 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. 39154 of 2011 and Criminal Misc.-M No. 19488 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 28.9.2011 Ayyub .. Petitioner Vs. Islam and another .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Salim Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Satish Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent No. 1. Mr. G. S. Chahal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. ... Rajesh Bindal J. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed application for correction of the order passed by this court on 18.7.2011. He submitted that inadvertently, the certificate, which was submitted by him, was stated to have not been submitted by him and the certificate, which is not existing on record, was stated to be submitted by him. In fact, the petitioner had submitted a certificate issued by Ch. Charan Singh Junior Middle School, Chata (UP) and not from Government School, Mojpur, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District Alwar (Rajasthan). The application is allowed. The order passed by this court on 18.7.2011 shall be read as under: “Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the allegations in the complaint pertaining to replacement of the certificate of education produced on record by the petitioner are totally false. The petitioner had produced certificate issued by Ch. Charan Singh Junior Middle School, Chata (UP) and not from Government School, Mojpur, Tehsil Criminal Misc. -M No. 19488 of 2011 [2] Laxmangarh, District Alwar (Rajasthan), which, on verification, was found to be correct. He further submitted that two other accused in the same complaint have already been granted the benefit of pre-arrest bail.” Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that after the complaint by the complainant alleging that Naib Tehsildar had removed the certificate from the file and replaced the same, Tehsildar had conducted the enquiry. Record from the school was summoned and it was found that transfer certificate as well as admission of the petitioner in the school was found to be genuine. He further submitted that in terms of the order passed by this court on 18.7.2011, the petitioner has put in appearance before the court below and furnished his bail bonds. On the other hand, learned counsel for the complainant sought to place reliance upon the statement made by Principal of the School before the court below stating that at the serial number alleged by the petitioner in the admission register, name of the petitioner is not there. Before Tehsildar, record had been produced and statements of Record Keeper, Office Assistant Basic Educationh Officer, Chhata (Mathura) and Principal of the School were recorded on 25.5.2011, in which they submitted that transfer certificate as well as admission of the petitioner was genuine. Considering the aforesaid facts, in my opinion, the petitioner is not required to be taken into custody. The interim bail granted to the petitioner on 18.7.2011 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 28.9.2011 mk