AB 1107/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE C.R.. SARMA Heard Mr. S.C. Biswas, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioners. Also hear d Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, appearing for the State-respo ndent and Mr. N. Dhar, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the informant. This is an application, filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., seeking pre-arrest bail in favour of the petitioners, namely, (1) Md. Abdul Rahman, (2) Md. Abdul Latif , (3) Md. Abdul Kadir and (4) Md. Adbul Rouf, in connection with Karimganj P.S. Case No.137/2011, under Sections 120(B)/448/326/307/302 IPC read with Sections 2 5/27 of the Arms Act. Perused the Case Diary. The allegations made against the petitioners, as revealed from the FIR, is that, on the night of 23.03.2011, some miscreants entered into the premise of the inf ormant and fired through gun and as a result of which, the minor daughter of the informant sustained grievous injuries and she succumbed to the said injuries. According to the informant, the petitioners, whose names have been mentioned in the FIR, were found running away from the place of occurrence. It has also been alleged that, due to inimical relation, the petitioners have threatened to kill the brother of the informant by engaging hire killer, if necessary. Having heard the learned counsel, appearing for both the parties and considering the nature of allegations as well as the materials on record, I don’t find it t o be a fit case to extend the benefit of pre-arrest bail in favour of the petiti oners. Accordingly, the prayer for pre-arrest bail is rejected. The A.B. Application is disposed of. Return the Case Diary.