Civil Revision No. 1573 of 2010(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1573 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: March 09, 2010 Saahabuddin and others ...... Petitioners Versus Nek Mohammad and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.Adarsh Jain, Advocate for the petitioners. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. This petition has been filed against the orders of the Courts below declining the application of the petitioners under Order 39 rules 1 and 2 CPC for a temporary injunction restraining the respondents from alienating the property in dispute. The petitioners filed a suit for possession by partition of 2 marlas of land (out of 2 Kanals and 11 Marlas). Both the courts have prima facie found that due to an earlier sale made by the petitioners themselves they were left with no share in the land in dispute. Both the courts further held that any alienation which may be made by the respondents would be hit by the doctrine of lis pendens. Learned counsel has vehemently argued that the claim of the petitioners was duly recorded in the revenue record and Civil Revision No. 1573 of 2010(O&M) 2 thus it was a case where temporary injunction ought to have been granted. In my opinion the interest of justice will be served if, apart from the doctrine of lis pendens, a further protection is granted to the petitioners that in case respondents wish to alienate the land in dispute they may do so but they shall be bound to place on record of the case the complete details of any alienee/s so that the petitioners have an opportunity to implead the said person/s. With this modification this revision petition is dismissed. Since the main case has been decided, the pending Civil Misc. Applications, if any, stand disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE March 09, 2010 sunita