W.P.Nos.13037, 29939, 29340, 29341 of 2010 and 30996 & 30997 of 2012 RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J. After hearing the learned Senior Advocate appearing for the Management for some time, the prime point that was projected by the learned Senior Advocate as far as the petitioner [T.Sadagopan] in WP Nos.13037 & 29339 of 2010, is that once the lower Court has come to the conclusion and gave a specific finding that the report of the enquiry officer is not in accordance with the evidence and is held to be perverse, he ought to have ordered for reinstatement with backwages and attendant benefits and not for lumpsum payment. At the time of the admission of the writ petitions, they have paid Rs.1,20,000/- to the labour and the labour has also moved for payment of gratuity before the authority and has to get instructions whether a sum of Rs.83,000/- is paid or not. 2. Learned counsel for the Management is hereby required to file heads of payment and details of payment made to the labour [T.Sadagopan], for better appreciation of the factual position. 3. Post the matter on 24.07.2023, under the caption 'Part Heard'. 17.07.2023 ars https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis