IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10160 of 2008 MITHILESH KUMAR SINGH, SON OF LATE RAM SURAJ SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SHER, P.S. SIDHWALIA, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ, AT PRESENT RESIDENT OF MOHALLA NAYA TOLA(CHANDRABLE), P.S. KEZI, MOHAMMANDPUR, TOWN AND DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY OF LAW DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 2. DR. DINESH KUMAR SINGH, SON OF LATE RAM SURAJ SINGH, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA NAYA TOLA(CHNDRALOK), P.S. KAZZI MOHAMMANDPUR(TOWN) DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR. 3. SMT. URMILA THAKUR, WIFE OF RAM CHANDRA THAKUR AND DAUGHTER OF LATE RAM SURAJ SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KAMTAUL, P.S. KAMTAUL, DISTRICT DARBHANGA AT PRESENT RESIDING OF(RETIRED ENGINEER OF H.F.C.), B/409, SERVICE HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE ASHOK NAGER(ARGORA), RANCHI(JHARKHAND). 4. SMT. GEETA SHARMA, WIFE OF DR. MRITUNJAI PRASAD SHARMA AND DAUGHTER OF LATE RAM SURAJ SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AMARSI BIGHA, P.S. BELA, DISTRICT GAYA AT PRESENT RESIDING AT 1854, NORTH-23 R.D.S.T. LARAMJE, WY-82070, U.S.A. ----------- 04. 15.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent nos.2 to 4. 2. Petitioner-plaintiff is aggrieved by the order dated 15.5.2008, Annexure-3, whereunder deed revoking the will has been admitted in evidence on behalf of the defendants with objection of the plaintiff. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that instead of admitting the document in evidence, the court below should have decided the admissibility of the document at the time the document was admitted in 2 evidence for consideration. In support of such submission reliance is placed on the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Ram Ratan(dead) by legal representatives Versus Bajrang Lanl and Others, reported in AIR 1978 Supreme Court 1393. After Amendment in the Code of Civil Procedure the impetus is on early decision in the suit. To facilitate early decision in the suit it is necessary that admissibility of the document admitted in evidence with objection be considered and decided at the time of final hearing of the suit and not at interlocutory stage. I do not find any illegality in the order passed by the trial court. Application is dismissed. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)