IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST JULY 2010 / 30TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 19390 of 2010(W) ------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- K.KOYA, S/O.KUTTIYAMU, KALLINTHADATHIL HOUSE, OZHUR P.O., TANALUR,TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SAJU J.VALLYARA RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM. BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI.K.S.MUHAMMED HASHIM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.19390/2010 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE REQUEST DTD. 16.4.2010 SUBMTITED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT. TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss K. SURENDRA MOHAN, J. ------------------------------------------------------------ W.P(C) NO:19390 OF 2010 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st July, 2010. JUDGMENT The petitioner is a stage carriage operator conducting services on the route Ozhur-Tirur-Kavilakkad-Chemmad- Valanchery with stage carriage vehicle bearing Reg.No.KL- 05/V 2143 on the strength of a regular permit. According to the petitioner, his timings were settled on 25.3.2009. Thereafter, a number of new services have been introduced on the route. Consequently, the time gap with which the petitioner had been conducting his services has been drastically reduced. The arrival and departure timings of the petitioner also require suitable alterations so as to ensure that his service is conducting smoothly. Therefore, the petitioner has submitted Ext.P1 request for the revision of his own timings before the respondent. He complains that no orders have been passed thereon till date. 2. The learned Senior Government Pleader submits that the matter could be considered and appropriate orders passed without further delay. Wpc No.19390/2010 2 3. In the above circumstances, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider the request for revision of timings submitted by the petitioner evidenced herein by Ext.P1 in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. K. SURENDRA MOHAN Judge css/