FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3609 OF 2011 "Panchashil Shikshan Sanstha Aurangabad Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. R.M. Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.K. Tambe,Assistant Govt. Pleader for respondent No.1. Mr. Chandrakant A. Jadhav, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & R.M. BORDE, JJ. DATE :- 5TH SEPTEMBER, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] The petition was initially filed by the petitioner contending that though the petitioner has submitted his proposal for starting RANM course, the same is not decided. 2] Learned counsel for the petitioner states that vide order dated 5th January, 2011, the proposal of the petitioner has already been rejected. In that view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks liberty to withdraw the petition, with further liberty to file an appeal as provided under Section 25 of the Maharashtra Nurses Act, 1966. In the event, if there is any delay in filing the appeal, the period during which the petitioner was prosecuting this petition, would be considered for condonation of delay under Section 14 of the Limitation Act. [R.M. BORDE,J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/-