IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6386 of 2009 SRI BRAJ KISHORE PRASAD son of Late Babu Durga Prasad, resident of Mohalla- South of Church, Mithanpura, P.O.- Ramna, P.S.- MIthanpura, District Muzaffarpur. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR through its Secretary, Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.The Chancellor, Universities of Bihar, Raj Bhawan, Patna 3.Lalit Narayan Mithila University, through its Registrar, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga. 4.Vice Chancellor, L.N.Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga 5.The Principal, C.M. College, Darbhanga 6.Magadh University through its Registrar, Bodh Gaya 7.The Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya 8.Veer Kunwar Singh University through its Registrar, Ara 9.The Vice Chancellor, Veer Kunwar Singh University, Ara. ----------- 2 20.05.2009 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the respondents. The grievance of the petitioner is that his pension has been reduced, and as such, he is being paid lesser amount of pension without any communication to the petitioner for such deduction. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.4 submits that the petitioner in the present writ application has not given the relevant details with respect to his claims, as stated in the writ application, however if there is any legal grievance of the petitioner required to be redressed, same shall be looked into. In the above circumstances, it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that for redressal of the grievances, as raised in this writ application, the - 2 - petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.4. In this view of the matter, it is directed that in case such representation giving all the relevant details in support of his claim as also the supportive documents is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order, the respondent no.4 shall consider and dispose of the same by a reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of the representation. Upon such consideration, if the representation is disposed of in favour of the petitioner, the above respondent shall simultaneously issue necessary orders so that the grievances of the petitioner, as raised in the representation, could be redressed without delay in the light of the order passed by him on such representation. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)