HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 616 of 2008 (M/S) Yaqoob …. Petitioner .. Versus Commissioner, Garhwal Mandal Camp and others … Respondents Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. 18th March, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. The petitioner admittedly had a fair price shop. The District Supply Officer, Haridwar vide order dated 1.2.2006 suspended the licence of his fair price shop and attached the same to the fair price shop of village Bharapur. The petitioner preferred an appeal against the order of the District Supply Officer which was also dismissed. Aggrieved by the order passed in appeal, the petitioner had filed a writ petition being no. WPMS 1811 of 2006 which was disposed of by giving direction to the District Supply Officer, Haridwar to conduct enquiry against the petitioner. All the same, it has been stated that instead of District Supply Officer, the Sub Divisional Magistrate has decided the matter. Therefore, there has been no proper compliance of the order of the High Court. Order dated 1.9.2007 passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Roorkee, therefore, is quashed. It is made clear that nothing is being stated by this Court on merit of the case. The petitioner shall make a fresh reply to the District Supply Officer, Haridwar within fifteen days from today and if such reply is given by the petitioner, the District Supply Officer, Haridwar shall dispose of the matter within one month from receiving such a reply. 2 With these observations, writ petition is disposed of. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 18.3.2009 Avneet 3