x?“ IN‘THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR {CHHATTISGARHI §§gxgg§g x WP. S No. ? 2009 / Sunil Kurhar Pandey, S/o. Late Kamal Narayan Pandey, aged about 53 years, Occupation — Lab Technician, District Hospital Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS PETITIONER RESPONDENTS: (1) Stats of Chhattisgarh, through its Secreta-Fy, Health Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) (2) Chief Medical Officer, Ambikapur, . Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) Civil Surgeon, District Hospital Ambikapur, Distt. Sarguja {c.G.) Dr. Uttam Singh, District Tuberculosis Officer, Ambikapur, I Distt. Sarguja(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA x r x». /V w HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION {S 3 No. 631 1 of2009 .PETITIONFZR : Sunil Kumar Pandey. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF TI-E CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shl'i Satish K. Agjhotl‘i, J. Present: Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitioner. , Shri V.V. S.Moorthy, Deputy Advocate General with Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No. 1 to 3. r ORDER ORAL (PasSed on 24 day of August, 201 I) Learned counsel appearing for theStaie/respondents submits that the petitioner has already continued at the original place ofposting for more than l year and 9 months on account of intelim order granted by this Court on 04. l l .2009. The State/respondent No. 1 to 3 may be granted libelty to pass appropriate orders keeping in View public interest and administrative exigency. Shri Mootthy further submits that the State/respondent N0. 1 to 3 shall not insist upon compliance of the impugned order dated 30.06.2009 (Annexure- P/2) in respect ofthe petitioner. 2. At this stage, when no effect could be given to the impugned order dated 30.06.2009 (Annexure P/2) on account of the interim order dated 04.11.2009, thus, it is not necessary to go into legality and validity of the aforestated impugaed order: 3. In view of the above, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. sin. ~~. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit LL! ..