,il"B^ Y^y. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (227)No.2356 of2009 Petitioner Respondents Decree holders Judgment debtor Rajesh Kuanfi* Kurenjekar, son of Late Inder Chand Kurenjekar, aged about 46 years, resident of 183^ Sai Kripa, Geetanjali Nagar, Sector 1, Tehsil and District Raipur (CG). Versus 1. Ramkumar Chakradhari, aged about 42 years. 2. Manohar Lal Chakradhari, aged about 35 years. 3. Kanhaiyalal Chakradhari, aged about 44 yeai^. All are sons of Late Damdi Lal Chakradhari. 4. Manki Bai Chakradhari^ agedabout 70 years, widow of Late Damdi Lal Chakradhari. No. 1 to 4 are residents ofHanuman Nagar, Boriya Road, Raipur. 5. Raththu Kumhar, son of Hariram Kumhar. 6. Ganesh Kumhan son of Raththu Lal KunAar. Both residents of Pachpedi Naka, Tikrapara, Raipur. 7. Laxmi Bai, widow ofDhanesh Kumhar. 8. Kamal Narayati Kuniliar, son of Late Dhanesh Kumhar. 9. Girdhari Kumhar, son of Late Dhanesh Kumliar. 10.8arita Kumhar, daughter of Late Dhanesh Kuiiihar. ll.Mateshwari Kumhar, daughter of Late Dhaiiesh KunAar. No. 7 to 11 are resident of Village Kliarenga, Tehsil and District Dhamtari. 12.Aditendra Shukla, son of Shri Ramashaiikar Shukla, 13.Anjay Shukla, son of Shri Shri Vyay Shaiikar Shukla, Both residents of Shukla Bhawan, Sharda Chowk, Raipur, Telisil aiid District Raipur. 14.8mt. Poonam Shukla, widow of Late Brijesh Shukla, resident of Phool Chowk, Raipur. 15.Abhishek Mishra, son of SIiri Naretidi'a Mishra, resident of Shukla Bhawan; Sharda Chowk, Raipur, Telisil and District Raipur. \€i^ ^ Writ Petition under Article 227 ofthe Constitutiou oflndia (Smgle Bench: Hon'ble Mr. N.IC Agarwal, J.) Preseiit : Shri B.P. Shamra with Shri Vivek Chopara, Advocates for the petitioner. None for the respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on 7th day ofMay, 2009) 1. Learhed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to contest the matter on merits at this stage. However, his applicatioa filed under Order 21 Rule 99 read with Section 151 ofCPC, which is registered as MJC No. 18/06 and the same is pending consideration since 2006 in the court ofXIIIth Civil Judge, Class II. Raipur, may be directed to be decided m accordance with law within a specified period. He farther submits that the said case ought to have been disposed of till now but due to delay m tactic adopted by the respondent; the same has not been disposed of, and prays for early disposal ofthe case. 2. Prayer is accepted. Having regard to facts situation ofthe case, it is directed that the XIIIth Civil Judge, Class II, Raipur, shall decide the case in accordance with law, on its own merits, as early as possible, preferably within a period of one year from the date of receipt ofa copy ofthis order. 3. With the above direction, this petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. 4. Consequently, pending applications, stand disposed of Sahu Sd/- N.K.Agarwal Judge