IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 27TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 8TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 6355 of 2009(L) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- RAJU THOMAS, S/O.THOMAS,AGED 64 YEARS VADAKKEDATH HOUSE, KADAVANTHRA DESOM, ELAMKULAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNOOR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.J.KURIACHAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, KAKKANAD. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, KANAYANNOOR TALUK ERNAKULAM. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VAZHAKKALA. BY GOVT. PLEADER SR. P.N. SATHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ----------------------- W.P.(C).No. 6355 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 27th day of February, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner submits that by Ext.P1 he purchased a property having an extent of 4.09 ares, with a pathway. It is stated that when the re-survey was conducted, the pathway was excluded and complaining of this and seeking correction in the re-survey records, he has filed Ext.P2 before the Ist respondent. Orders have not been passed and therefore this writ petition has been filed praying for a direction to the Ist respondent to pass orders on Ext.P2. Having regard to the case of the petitioner regarding the pendency of Ext.P2, the writ Petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 6 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. It is directed that, in case the order passed by WP(c).No.6355/09 /2/ the first respondent is one allowing the request made by the petitioner, it will be open to the petitioner to produce the same before respondents 2 and 3 who shall pass consequential orders. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the Ist respondent for compliance. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WP(c).No.6355/09 /2/