IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 26548 of 2000 Between: Smt.E.Satyavathi, W/o. E.Venkata Subbaiah, Door.No.2/157, IInd Road, Anantapur, Anantapur District. ..... PETITIONER AND Regional Transport Officer, Anantapur, Anantapur District. .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.E.MARUTHI RAJA Counsel for the Respondent: AGP FOR TRANSPORT The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is ﬁled for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated above, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, preferably one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned order of the respondent dated 26-4-1997 in Rc.No.4271/A2/97, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently direct the respondent herein to permit the Petitioner to operate her Stage Carriage Bus APA 5471 on the Route - Roddam to Penukonda (via) Ragimakalapalli, Bucharla, etc., as usual, not withstanding with the approved scheme referred to in impugned order of the respondent.” At the hearing, Sri E.Maruthi Raja, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, interim order dated 29-12-2000 is vacated and WPMP No.33756 of 2000 is dismissed as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 9th September, 2008 vrn