IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA RFA No. 90 of 2002 Date of decision: 13.05.2010 Dr. Y.S. Parmar University … Appellant Versus Hira Singh and others ... Respondents Coram : The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the appellant: Mr. B.S. Attri, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Vikas Rathour, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 5 and 6. None for respondents No. 2 to 4. V.K. Ahuja, J. (Oral): The land of the petitioners and others was acquired vide notification issued under Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act. Reference petitions were preferred by the petitioners and other owners and the learned Additional District Judge, Solan, vide his award dated 10.5.2000 in Land Reference No. 33-S/4 of 1997 and other cases, remanded the case to the Land Acquisition Collector, Solan, for deciding the same afresh on merits. Against the said award passed by the Court of learned Additional District Judge, Solan, in Land Reference No. 33-S/4 of 1997, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University preferred the present appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act and one such appeal 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 preferred by the Dr. Y.S. Parmar University in Land Reference No. 4-S/4 of 1997 has been disposed of by this Court vide judgment dated 29.10.2009 in RFA No. 12 of 2001 alongwith other connected appeals and the appeals were accordingly allowed and the award passed by the Reference Court was set aside. The present appellant had also challenged the same award passed in Land Reference No. 33-S/4 of 1997 and other cases and once the appeal preferred against the said award has already been allowed by this Court, it is a covered matter and same judgment has to be followed in the present case. Therefore, a certified copy of the said judgment passed in RFA No. 12 of 2001 alongwith other connected appeals, decided on 29.10.2009, shall be placed on the record of this case by the Registry and the present appeal shall also be covered by the said judgment passed in that case. The appeal stands allowed and the award passed by the learned Additional District Judge stands quashed accordingly. The parties shall be bound by the judgment passed in RFA No. 12 of 2001 alongwith other connected appeals. The appeal stands disposed of accordingly. 2. In view of the disposal of the main appeal, all the pending Misc. Applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( V.K. Ahuja ), May 13, 2010 Judge (BSS)