LPA No. 2249 of 2011 -1- IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH LPA No. 2249 of 2011 Date of Decision: December 07, 2011 Raghu Garg and another …Appellant Versus Board of Management of Sant Longowal Institute of Engineering & Technology, Longwal, District Sangrur and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present: Mr. Vijay Kumar Jindal, Advocate for the appellant. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. 1. The instant appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent is directed against judgment dated 13.10.2011 dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant has placed reliance on some new documents, which have been placed on record of the appeal as Annexures P-16 and P-17 to argue that persons with less than 50% marks have been permitted to join Ph.D. Course. The aforesaid documents were never before the learned Single Judge and therefore, the remedy for the appellant is to move an appropriate application before the learned Single Judge instead of filing the instant appeal. LPA No. 2249 of 2011 -2- 3. Accordingly, the appeal fails and the same is dismissed with liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned Single Judge. The dismissal shall not preclude the learned Single Judge to entertain the application and decide the matter in accordance with law after considering the aforesaid documents. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (RAJIV NARAIN RAINA) JUDGE December 07, 2011 Atul