1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5486 OF 2010. Dr. Ganesh S. Mehare and another -: VERSUS :- Shri Mangesh V. Deshpande and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : NOVEMBER 22, 2010. Heard Shri R.D. Bhuibar, learned Counsel for Petitioners. By the impugned order the learned Trial Court has permitted defendant no.3 to amend his written statement and to correct the error. The error sought to be corrected was about mentioning number of defendant number in it. According to learned Counsel for petitioners, the impugned order permits defendant no.3 to withdraw the admission in favour of defendant no.1 and also present petitioners who are defendant nos. 4 and 5 in the suit. I have perused the impugned order. The learned trial Court has in paragraph no.11 considered the entire 2 written statement to note that it appears to be a typing error. Shri Bhuibar, learned Counsel wants to rely upon certain other material to show that it is not a typing error. However that liberty and opportunity is available to the petitioners and can be used before the Trial Court at appropriate stage. The contention that constitutes withdrawal of admission in present facts is misconceived. With above liberty to petitioner, present petition is disposed of no costs. JUDGE Rgd.