^ IN THE M.P. STftTE fiDMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNflL RftIPUR BENCH BA(; t^C^) 3 ^ /o^; O.A.No. APPLICfiNT PETITIONER ^\ 200 001 ^ ^gi^^T )ft Filed toi/ay.nA^Z.&5^,'&&,— bf Shfi-S^.'.^.^'StS^^^ «.f. SWeMtoi, Tf mslA DR.NftNDINI TIWfiRI TIWftRI; aged 34 years ji/ft'fS^ of Shri Sanjay Txwari, ftsstt. Professor (Hindi), &3y<t. Agrasen lyalaya*",~"Dlst-t. Bilaspur (C.B.) VERSUS NW AWLICQNTS RESPONDENTS 1. ^ ^ "^jK State of Chhattisgarh, through The Secretary, Deptt. of Higher Education, Govt. of Chhattisgarh D.K. Bhawan Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh)• The CDflifTiissioner of Hiciher Ectucation, Govt. of Chhattisgarh,, Sci.ence College, Raipur Chhattisgarh. The Principal, Soyt. Agrasen MahavidYalaya, Bilha, Dist-k. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 1 fiPP'LICATION UNDER SECTION 1<? OF THE ADMINISTRfiTIVE TRIBUNAL ACT 1985. sn^i^i l^ira'an^i 3)^lch ^T^ t^-<- v ^sf •^W\v\^,^WI'»,feTRiy W*I?iT**l|ch •vs^ ^.fts^-^i0)0^ ^.^.....'^.A.......:.........^ 200 sii^i'TO'iwaf^a SB-; H.on'bieShri Manindra MohanSUrivastava, «J 23-03-201ft ,WheR;.~,tl3e matter was called petitioner and the matter was passed appears,fo[;tjafi,petitjoner. Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, Pant !n view of-the return filed by th[ disposed of resen/ing liberty to the pet|tioner remains unredressed. A copy of the ord) •*l''<I<'l41-f 'qFRlf'? fet8 '(feSR ^73TPgH3II^I for hearing, none appears for the 'pver. Even in the second call, none Lawyer for the State/respondents. respondents, the petition is finally to revive, if his grievance still T be sent to the petitioner. Sd/- , Mamndra Mohan Shrivastaya Judge •i:^:y:-~ ['1[ft^'^fe; I