IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN FRIDAY, THE 3RD JULY 2009 / 12TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 15585 of 2009(P) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- K.J. JOLLY, W/O. PAUL, AGED 43 YEARS, CHAKIATH HOUSE, PARAKKADAVU.P.O., PARAKKADAVU, PIN -683 579. BY ADVS. MR.S.SUDHISH KUMAR, MR.K.Y.TOMY. RESPONDENT: ---------------------- THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES LIMITED, TOWN HALL ROAD, TRICHUR – 680 020. BY MR. M.K. CHANDRAMOHAN DAS, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/07/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.15585/2009-P: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE DISABILITY CERTIFICATES ISSUED FROM THE MEDICAL BOARD, GENERAL HOSPITAL, ERNAKULAM. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED FROM LOURDES HOSPITAL, ERNAKULAM DATED 20/12/2007. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DTD. 02/06/2009 ISSUED FROM CARMEL HOSPITAL, ALUVA. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE GOVT. ORDER NO. G.O.(P) 11/90/P&ARD DT. 05/05/1990. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE RESPONDENT VIDE ORDER NO. 3583/A2/2004 DATED 30/05/2009. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 02/06/2009 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT. EXT.P.7: COPY OF THE DECISION OF THE MANAGING COMMITTEE OF THE RESPONDENT DTD. 16/03/2009 INCLUDED IN THE LETTER DT. 30/04/2009. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. Prv. P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.15585 of 2009 -------------------------------------- Dated 3rd July, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner, a person with disability has filed this writ petition challenging Ext.P5 order dated 30.5.2009 transferring her from Ernakulam to Thrissur. By reason of the interim orders passed by this Court, the petitioner is presently continuing at Ernakulam. It is now brought to my notice that by order passed on 11.6.2009, the order of transfer in so far as it relates to the petitioner and three others has been kept in abeyance. A copy of the order dated 11.6.2009 was also made available to me for perusal. It is stated therein that the respondent is reconsidering the transfer of the petitioner and three others. In my opinion, in view of the stand taken by the respondent in the order passed on 11.6.2009, it is not necessary to keep this writ petition pending. It is accordingly closed, reserving liberty with the petitioner to move this Court afresh if occasion arises in future. P.N.RAVINDRAN Judge TKS