cp280.09 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 280 OF 2009 Shivling s/o Sharanappa Mathapati and others ...Petitioners Versus Suposhpani Sadavijay Arya ...Respondent WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 177 OF 2010 Sidheshwar s/o Kishanrao Shahir and others ...Petitioners Versus Suposhpani Sadavijay Arya ...Respondent WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 328 OF 2010 Balaji Bhagwan Wattamwar ...Petitioner Versus Suposhpani Sadavijay Arya ...Respondent WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 51 OF 2011 Dr. Subhash Kamal Devendra Kamal and others ...Petitioners Versus Suposhpani Sadavijay Arya ...Respondent cp280.09 -2- WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 136 OF 2011 Mallikarjun s/o Namdeo Kumbhar ...Petitioner Versus Suposhpani Sadavijay Arya ...Respondent ..... Mr. S.R. Chaukidar, advocate for the petitioners Mr. V.D. Salunke h/f Mr. M.P. Gude, advocate for respondents ..... CORAM: R.M. BORDE, J. DATED: 5TH APRIL, 2011 PER COURT:- 1 Shri Chaukidar, learned counsel for the petitioners in these contempt petitions, fairly states that the order passed by this court in respect of which violation is alleged, has been complied with and the respective teachers have been issued cheques in respect of due amount receivable by them from the management. 2 It is pointed out that so far as the petitioner Nos. 4 and 13 Shivaji Shankarrao Patil and Vijaysingh Jadhavsingh Chandele, in contempt petition No. 280 of 2009, there is some error in calculating the amount of salary receivable by them. Shri Chaukidar, counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the details in respect of the amount receivable by concerned petitioners would be furnished to the cp280.09 -3- respondents through Mr. Salunke, learned counsel appearing for the respondents within a period of one week from today. 3 Shri Salunke, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that on receipt of said details, he would forward the same to respondent No.1 and the said respondent would ensure the ratification of error, if any, within a period of four weeks from today. 4 In view of statement recorded above, these contempt petitions can be disposed of and same are accordingly disposed of. 5 Shri Chaukidar, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that his clients are not interested in receiving the amount of cost deposited by the respondents in this court and the said amount shall be transmitted to the High Court Bar Association’s Library, Bench at Aurangabad. In view of this statement, the amount of costs, deposited in this court be transmitted to the account of High Court Bar Association Library, Bench at Aurangabad. ( R.M. BORDE. J.) rlj/