IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC NO.3799 OF 2011 1. GANAURI PRASAD S/O SRICHAND MAHTO 2. DHARAMVEER KUMAR S/O GOKHUL MAHTO 3. PAPPU KUMAR S/O LATE KRISHNA PRASAD 4. MD. MUSLIM S/O MOHIUDDIN 5. NAGENDRA KUMAR S/O LATE RAGHO RAM 6. RAM BACHAN PRASAD S/O CHANDESHWAR PRASAD 7. ASHOK KUMAR S/O CHANDESHWAR PRASAD 8. HRIDAY DAS S/O LATE RAMPRIT DAS 9. UMESH PRASAD S/O LATE RAGHUNANDAN PRASAD 10. UMESH YADAV S/O RAMJI YADAV 11. RAJU RAM S/O LATE PANCHAM RAM 12. MANIKANT KUMAR S/O LATE BISHUN DEO PRASAD 13. RAJA RAM PRASAD S/O LATE CHANDESHWAR PRASAD 14. VIJAY PRASAD S/O LATE THAKUR MAHTO 15. RAM LAGAN PASWAN S/O LATE BANDHYU PASWAN AND 16. RAGHUNI PRASAD S/O LATE RAGHUNANDAN PRASAD, ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE BAIN, NALANDA. VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE CUM COLLECTOR NALANDA 3. THE SDO RAJGIR, NALANDA 4. THE BDO, BAIN BLOCK, RAJGIR 5. THE CDPO, BAIN PRAKHAND, RAJGIR 6. THE PANCHAYT SECRETARY CUM SEWAK, GRAM PANCHAYAT BAIN. ----------- 4. 26.04.2011. The instant writ application has been filed by way of Public Interest Litigation to direct enquiry into various acts of omission and commission of the Panchayat Secretary and the Mukhia of Gram Panchayat Bain, in the district of Nalanda. 2 We find that the allegations of misappropriation of public money are vague and general in nature. Some of these allegations even do not relate to the Panchayat in question. The petitioner has not made any prior representation before the appropriate authority under the Panchayati Raj Act before moving this application. Thus the writ application is accordingly dismissed. (Sudhir Kumar Katriar,J). Shashi (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)