IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 11TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 22ND MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 4447 of 2011(E) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- BABURAJ, S/O.DIVAKARAN, KOLOTHPADINJAREYIL HOUSE, ANJILITHANAM, THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADV. SRI.K.I.SAGEER RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TRIPUNITHURA POLICE STATION, TRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682 301. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.T.K. VIPINDAS. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/02/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JJ. ----------------------------------- W.P(C).No.4447 OF 2011 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 11th day of February, 2011 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan,J. The petitioner draws a picturised version of certain disputes where the persons who are named in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the writ petition, though they are not on the party array, are involved. He says that he is only a watchman of a construction site and yet was summoned by the Sub Inspector of Police, the first respondent, and made to wait in the Police Station for a whole day and asked to come over even the second day. All that is necessary is for the Government Pleader to instruct the first respondent to act only in accordance with law. If the petitioner has any further grievance, he may move the Police Complaints Authority which WPC.4447/11 2 is now in place in every district and at the State level. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. Sd/- S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, Judge. kkb.11/2.