BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Ninth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.11967 of 2011 VELUCHAMY : PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ACHAMPUTHUR POLICE STATION ACHAMPUTHUR, SENKOTTAI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. CR.NO.145/2010 : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.DURAIRAJ Advocate For Respondent : Mr. A.RAMAR Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/A1 apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 498(A) and 506(i) of IPC, in Crime No.145 of 2010 on the file of the respondent police and hence seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is arrayed as A1 and he is the husband of the de-facto complainant. The marriage between the petitioner and the de-facto complainant solemnized in the year 2008 and difference of opinion arose between them and a case was registered in the year 2010 under Sections 498(A) and 506(i) IPC and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the case has been registered against seven accused persons and the investigation is over and the charge sheet has been filed, which was not taken on file and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that the case has been registered under Sections 498(A) and 506(i) IPC and the investigation was already over and the charge sheet has been filed and even though, the petitioner was not arrested neither he interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Senkottai and on execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 09/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SENKOTTAI. 2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ACHAMPUTHUR POLICE STATION, ACHAMPUTHUR, SENKOTTAI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. +1 CC to M/S. S.DURAIRAJ Advocate SR.No.30702 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11967 of 2011 NSV/13.9.11/2P/6C Date :09/09/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/