Gf-/^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTJSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P(Cr.)No. Bggo of 2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Gurdeep Singh Bhatia, S/o Late Shri Ravel Sfngff Bhatia, aged about 47 years, R/o Sandeep Sadan, Pulgaon Naka, Durg, District-Durg (C.G.), VERSKS :1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary Home Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) OS ^O^V ^TQ^ "^.^w .O^Y&<'-''V' ^/.^y ~ //¥ -S* <^ •Sr' ^ 2. Director General of Police, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Inspector General of Police, Raipur (C.G.) ». f ^f 4. Superintendent of Po'ice, Rajnandgaon, District-Rajnandgaon (C.G.) .5. Station House Officer, Police Station City Kotwali, District-Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ^-6. Devendra @ Rubi Garcha, S/o Late Harbansh Singh Garcha 7. Nitu Garcha, D/o Late Harbansh Singh (3archa, , ^ \ 8. Boby Garcha, Late Harbansh Singh Garcha, 9. Gurjit Garcha, Late Harbansh Singh Garcha, Respondent no. 6 to 9 are R/o . .AUtV.. ^CT r^. Me CI.V...MBI.. Cois.f.'iL^r, s loh R.cuA, Rajnandgaoi^ (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER AMjCLE 226<&F THE CONSTITUTION C'SO 1-7 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPLTR WRTT PETITION (Cr.) No. 3680 of2010 PETITIONER : Gurdeep Singh Bhatia. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. /WRIT PETmON LWDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITLTION OF INDIA SR. HnTS'hin Shri Sntiah K" A tmihnfril?^* SB: HoB'bie S hK., Pi-essnt: Shri Gautam Bhaduri. Advocate fbr th< Shri N.N.Rov. Panel Lawver for the St 2. .idents 1 to ;. ) (Passed on 26th day of July, 2010) The case ofthe petitioner is tliat, despite makiug written complaint, the respondents-police authorities ai'e not taking any action agamst the private respondent No. 6 to 9. Leamed counsel appeai-ing fbr fhe petitioner submits tliat the facts oftfae instant case is squarely covered by a decision of Supreme Court iti Sakirj Vasu v. State of U.P. & others . Thus, the petitionsr may be peiTnitted to withdraw tliis petition with liberty to file appropriate compiamt under the provisions of Code of Criniinal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'the Cr.P.C.') before the Magistrate. Leamed counsel appearing for other side has no objection. Accordingly, tlie writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforestated libertv. ___——-- ^——-- Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 f2008) 2 SCC 409 \""^~--/