I IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA Dated this the 26 day of September, 2011 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D,V. SHYLENDRA KUMAR AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE H.S.KEMPANNA WRIT APPEAL No.10202 OF 2011 (LB-ELE) BE’EWEEN SMT. GURABASAMMA W/O AYYANAGOUDA BIRADAR AGE: 75 YEARS 0CC: PRESIDENT, GRAM PANCHAYAT GABASAVALAGI RhO GABASAVALAGI, TQ: INDI DIST: BIJAPUR. APPELLANT (By Sri. : SHIVASHANKAR H MANUR, ADV.) AND THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AT INDI TQ: INDI, DIST: BIJAPUR REPRESENTED BY GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH, GULBARGA. RESPONDENT (By SrLMANVENDRA REDDY, GA) 2. THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S. 4 OF TFIE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE PASSED IN WRIT PETITION NO.83535/il DATED 06.9.2011 AND ALLOW THE WRIT PETITION NO.83535/2011 AS PRAYED FOR, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUTIY. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, SIIYLENDRA KIJMAR J. DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Mr.Shivashankar H Manur, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that while the writ appeal virtually does not survive for examination as not only No Confidence Motion’ against the appellant was carried in the Gabasavalagi Gram Panchayat to remove her from the post of President through election process is on, therefore, the writ appeal no doubt is to be dismissed, but seeks to point out that the learned Single Judge has unnecessary and very uncharitably imposed the cost of Rs.5,000/- on the petitioner while dismissing the writ petition and this requires to be set right and cost waived etc. A 4. .3 2. The cost Imposed by the learned single Judge cannot be interfered with by a Division Bench In the Writ Appeal. 3. No merit In this appeal, dismissed. Sd IUP$E SW. IUDG AP/’