D.B.HABEAS CORPUS PETITION NO. 5515/2009 Vishnu Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan and others. 26/08/2009 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.C.GANDHI HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.S.CHAUDHARI Mr. RM Jain, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajendra Yadav, Government Counsel, for the respondnets No. 1 and 2. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner seeks production of his wife who married to him five years ago. In para No. 6 of the body of writ petition he has stated that he had sent a notice to the respondent No.3-wife for restitution of the conjugal rights under Hindu Marriage Act, which has been returned back with the report that the respondent No.3-wife is not living at the place mentioned in the notice. It has been further submitted that since the notice has been returned at the instance of the father of the respondent No.3-wife, the petitioner has apprehension that the respondent No.3-wife has been kept in an illegal confinement. From above, it is seen that the present habeas corpus has been filed only on some apprehension. If, there is any matrimonial dispute between the petitioner-husband and the respondent No.3-wife, it is for the petitioner to seek proper remedy before appropriate forum under the Hindu Marriage Act. No interference is called for in the present Habeas Corpus petition. The same is dismissed accordingly. (K.S.Chaudhari), J. (R.C.Gandhi), J. Raghu