IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No.7972 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 23.12.2011 Sohan Lal -----Petitioner Vs. Parkash Kaur -----Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present:- Mr. S.S. Kanwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Kainth, Advocate for the respondent. --- RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J. 1. This is tenant’s revision petition challenging the order dated 17.4.2008 of the Rent Controller, Chandigarh, ordering his eviction from the demised premises and judgment dated 10.10.2011 of the Appellate Authority, dismissing his appeal. 2. Shorn of unnecessary details, it is suffice to say that eviction of the petitioner-tenant has been ordered from the demised premises on the ground that the same is required by the respondent-landlady for her personal bona fide need. Both the authorities below on appreciation of evidence have recorded a C.R. No.7972 of 2011 concurrent finding that the respondent-landlady required the demised premises for her personal bona fide need. 3. When learned counsel for the petitioner was unable to point out any fault in the finding of the authorities below, he submitted that the petitioner be granted a reasonable time to vacate the demised premises and hand over the vacant possession of the same to the respondent-landlady. 4. Shri Amit Kainth, Advocate appearing on behalf of the caveator-respondent/landlady has submitted before this Court that he has no objection if this Court grants a reasonable time to the petitioner-tenant for vacating the demised premises and handing over the vacant possession of the same to the respondent-landlady, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall make the payment of arrears and shall keep on paying the future rent in advance till the date of handing over of the vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent-landlady. 5. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, a consensus has reached that this petition be dismissed and the petitioner be granted time upto 31.7.2012 to vacate the demised premises and hand over the vacant possession of the same to the respondent-landlady subject to the condition of making payment of arrears of rent, if any, within two months from today, and that the petitioner-tenant shall keep on paying the future rent in advance by the 10th of every month with further stipulation that the petitioner-tenant shall file an undertaking before the executing 2 C.R. No.7972 of 2011 Court/Rent Controller within one month from today that he will hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent-landlady on or before the expiry of the time granted by this Court i.e. 31.7.2012. 6. Keeping in view the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition is dismissed and orders of the authorities below ordering eviction of the petitioner-tenant from the demised premises are upheld with the observations made above. The petitioner shall be bound by the submissions made before this Court on his behalf. 7. It is also clarified that in case of any violation of the aforesaid conditions, the eviction order shall come into force immediately. It is also made clear that in case the petitioner fails to hand over the vacant possession to the respondent-landlady, as stipulated above, the respondent-landlady may initiate contempt proceedings against him, in addition to execution of the impugned order. December 23, 2011 ( RAKESH KUMAR GARG ) ak JUDGE 3