1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1175 OF 2010 Export Credit and Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd. .. Petitioner Versus Punjab National Bank and Ors. .. Respondents Dr.Birendra Saraf with Faisal Sayyed and Shakib Bhorajiwala i/b. M.K.Ambalal & Co. for petitioner. Mr.Aniruddha Lad i/b. Intralegal for respondent No.1 CORAM : MOHIT SHAH,C.J. & S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. Date : 29th June 2010. P.C. 1] This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges an order of Debt Recovery Tribunal, Mumbai. Learned Counsel for respondent No.1 Punjab National Bank raises a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an equally efficacious, alternate remedy available by way of an appeal before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal. Learned Counsel for the petitioner, thereupon submits that if 2 the petitioner files appeal before the Tribunal now, there will be some delay in filing the same and the Tribunal may not accept it. However, this petition was filed before this Court within the period of limitation. 2] In view of the above, we direct that if the petitioner approaches the Appellate Tribunal within two weeks from today, the Tribunal shall hear and decide the appeal in accordance with law, without raising any objection of delay in filing the appeal. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (CHIEF JUSTICE) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)