In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh … C.W.P.No.8385 of 2008 Date of decision: 24.9.2008 Sukhdev Singh ..Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab and others ..Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr.Justice M.M.Kumar Hon'ble Mr.Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg Present: Mr.Sushil Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Suvir Sehgal, Addl.A.G.Punjab for respondent No.1 and 2 Mr. Munish Bansal, Advocate for the respondent No.3. ****** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? M.M.KUMAR,J. Learned counsel for the petitioner requests for withdrawal of the petition with liberty to make a representation with regard to the final settlement of pension. He further states that most of the other benefits stands paid. We order accordingly. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE September 24,2008 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) nk JUDGE