1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.3040 OF 2009 1. Danny Anna Pawar, 2. Ajay Anna Pawar, 3. Amin @ Amit Sahid Khan, 4. Sachin M.Parmar. .. Applicants Vs State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. Ganesh Gole, Advocate for the Applicants. Smt.P.P.Shinde, APP, for the Respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 13/07/2009 PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned APP for the respondent. 2. The applicants are seeking bail in C.R.No. 129 of 2009 of Mulund Police Station, Mumbai. The said crime has been registered against the applicants for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 326, 504 read with 34 of IPC. 3. Mr Gole, learned counsel for the applicants, at the outset, T 2 prays for withdrawal of this application on behalf of applicant no.2-Ajay Anna Pawar and No.3-Amin @ Amit Sahid Khan and seeks liberty to apply for bail on their behalf after some time. The application filed on behalf of applicant nos 2 and 3 is accordingly allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed. 4. I have perused the FIR and the other material placed before the court so also the injury certificate of both the injured witnesses. The only role attributed to applicant no.1-Danny Anna Pawar and applicant no.4-Sachin M.Parmar is that they assaulted the complainant with fist and kick blows. Keeping that in view and considering the nature of injuries sustained by the complainant and the other injured witness, I am inclined to enlarge them on bail. Applicant No.1-Danny Anna Pawar and no.4- Sachin M.Parmar are directed to be enlarged on bail in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each with one or two sureties to make up the said amount, subject to the conditions that applicant nos. 1 and 4 shall report to the concerned police station on every Saturday between 6 and 7 pm for a period of three months and thereafter on first Saturday of every month between 6 and 7 pm till conclusion of the trial. While passing this order I shall not be understood to 3 have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. Application is disposed of. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)