IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-33091 of 2011. Date of decision: December 14, 2011. Sohan Lal and another .. Petitioners VERSUS State of Punjab .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI * * * PRESENT Mr.A.S.Manaise, Adv., for the petitioners. Mr.K.S.Sidhu, DAG., Punjab. M.M.S.BEDI, J (ORAL). Petitioners have received incised wound and abrasions on the head and upper limbs as per Annexure P1. The case of the complainant against the petitioners is that they as members of an unlawful assembly were armed with lathis and other weapons. Petitioner Nos.1 & 2, have been attributed simple injury with Kahi. The injury attributed to the petitioners is not even an incised wound. Without expression of any opinion on merits, it appears that the injuries on the person of petitioners are not explained, in any manner. In case these are self-suffered injuries, there could have been a report of the Investigating Agency regarding the said injuries but on the instructions of ASI Sucha Singh, State counsel informs that the Investigating Agency has not recorded any cross-version. The petition is allowed. It is ordered that in case of arrest of the petitioners, they will be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to the conditions that they will join the investigation as and when required by the police and will not tamper with the evidence or hamper the investigation, in any manner. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE December 14, 2011. rka