IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 17TH JUNE 2008 / 27TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 18018 of 2008(T) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------------- P.JAGADEESAN NAIR, S/O. PARAMESWARAN PILLAI, AGED 57 YEARS, DWARAKA, PARASSALA VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK PIN – 695 502. BY ADV. SRI. P. KESAVAN NAIR SRI.K.G.CLEETUS RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. SUB REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR, PARASSALA 2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SRI. I.V.PREMOD, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 18018 of 2008 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 17th June, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioner presented Ext. P1 sale deed for registration before the 1st respondent. Apparently on the ground that there is some charge over the property, the 1st respondent refused to accept the same for registration. Against the action of the 1st respondent in refusing to accept Ext. P1 for registration, the petitioner filed Ext. P3 complaint before the 2nd respondent . Although the petitioner relies on Ext. P2 judgment in support of his case that the 1st respondent cannot refuse to accept the document for registration on the ground that there is a charge pending in respect of the property, the petitioner now confines his relief for a direction to the respondents to consider and pass orders on Ext. P3 expeditiously. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P3 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. While doing so, the petitioner is free to rely on Ext. P2 judgment or any other evidence in support of his case. The petitioner shall forward a certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition to the 2nd respondent for compliance. Issue photo copy urgently. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.