IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.4669 of 2009 Between: T.K. Raja, s/o. Raja Rao, E.No. 376261, r/o. 4th Division, Near Water Tank, Eluru-I, West Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The APSRTC, Rep by its Managign Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Eluru Dept, Eluru-1, West Godavari District. 3 Sri Subhash Chandra Bose, Depot Manager APSRTC, Eluru, West Godavari District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.SRIDHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents:MR.C.PRAKASH REDDY(SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to call for the records from the Respondents herein by issuing a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of 2nd respondent herein placing me under suspension Proc.No. 01/114 (1) /2009-ELR even dated 3-2-2009, as arbitrary, illegal, unjust, not bona fide, contrary to law, without application of mind and also in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the constitution of India, and consequently set aside the suspension order.” After arguing the case for some time, Sri P.Sridhar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with a request to direct the respondents to complete the enquiry at the earliest possible time. As the request of the learned counsel is found reasonable, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn in the following terms: 1. The petitioner is permitted to file his explanation within a period of two weeks from today. 2. Within a period of six weeks thereafter, the respondents shall complete the enquiry and pass appropriate orders. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as withdrawn, WPMP.No.6134 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 21st APRIL, 2009. kvni