1 IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE SIDE SIDE FAMILY FAMILY FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST) NO. 7728 OF 2004 COURT APPEAL (ST) NO. 7728 OF 2004 COURT APPEAL (ST) NO. 7728 OF 2004 Vasant Ramchandra Mirgule ... Appellant Vs. Vrushali Vasant Mirgule ... Respondent Mr. R.S. Apte with Mr. A.A. Garge for the Appellant. Respondent present in person. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED : AUGUST 25, 2004 P.C. 1. The appellant and Respondent are present in person. They have been explained contents of the consent terms. The respondent present in person and has been explained the same in English and she states that she is agreeable to the same. 2. Petition was filed by the appellant husband on the ground of cruelty. Parties agree that the said petition be treated as petition for divorce by consent. It is so treated as on the date of the filing of the petition before the Family Court. 3. Consent terms signed by the petitioner, counsel for the petitioner and respondent who is present in 2 person, are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The impugned order of the Family Court is set aside and the petition filed by the appellant is hereby allowed in terms of the consent terms. The family court is directed to pay the amount to respondent wife on respondent’s producing certified copy of this order without any condition of security. 4. Decree be drawn up accordingly. No order as to costs. C.C. expedited. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.)