IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA THURSDAY, THE 3RD JUNE 2010 / 13TH JYAISTHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 2203 of 2010() ---------------------------------------- CRMP.709/2010 of D.C. & SESSIONS COURT,KOLLAM ............................................... (CRIME No.334/2010 OF PARAVUR POLICE STATON, KOLLAM) ............................................... PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED ----------------------------------- VIJAYAKUMAR, S/O.DR.VIJAYAN, AGED 30 YEARS, RESIDING AT MARAVOOTU VEEDU, KONGAL, KOTTAPPURAM VILLAGE, PARAVUR, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.HARISH GOPINATH RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: --------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARAVUR POLICE STATION, THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. SHIBIN, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O HARIDASAN, RESIDING AT CHITHACHERRI HOUSE, KURUMANDAL, PARAVUR, KOLLAM. R2 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN Crl.M.A.3170/10 DATED 3.6.2010 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. V.TEK CHAND SRI.R.SURAJ KUMAR FOR ADDL.R2 THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sou. K. HEMA, J ---------------------- B.A.No. 2203 OF 2010 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of June, 2010 O R D E R This petition is for anticipatory bail. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that petitioner is not involved in this case, but only because his name is Vijayakumar, he is being proceeded against. 3. Learned counsel for defacto complainant submitted that petitioner is not the assailant and he has not committed any offence against defacto complainant. Affidavit is also filed to that effect by defacto complainant. As per the affidavit, defacto complainant does not intend to proceed against petitioner. In such circumstances, there can be no ground for any apprehension of arrest. This petition is dismissed. K. HEMA, JUDGE. Sou.