IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.895 of 2010 1. SUNAINA SINHA WIDOW OF LATE RAMCHANDRA PRASAD R/O EAST LOHANIPUR, KASHINATH LANE, DASHRATH BHAWAN, P.S.- KADAMKUAN, DISTT.- PATNA ……………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SRI K.K. LABH S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER AT PRESENT POSTED AS THE CIVIL SURGEON-CUM-CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, ARA, BHOJPUR 3. SRI MITHILESH KUMAR S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER POSTED AS CLERK IN THE OFFICE OF THE CIVIL SURGEON, ARA, BHOJPUR 4. SRI DIHAR NARAYAN SUDHANSHU S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER AT PRESENT POSTED THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, ARA, BHOJPUR …………………..OPP. PARTIES. 5 11.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State are present. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order has been complied with and admissible dues have been paid too. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that even though the Accountant General has issued authorization for payment of pension, however, the same has not been paid by the Treasury Officer for want of no objection. Considering the submission, this contempt application need not proceed further. However the petitioner will be at liberty to approach the concerned authority so that the no objection certificate, if any, required for making payment of pension by the Treasury Officer could be obtained. The contempt application stands disposed of. S.P. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)