No. f:H@d foc'^j' 'B'f CS'?:rt?T!^ •S O-.L- 'i'ed too3S'^...i---^'--_———— ,7^, ^-c^.'.P^fe.^s-5!'1^ 3EFO°E THE HCNtBDB STATS ADI.M.TRI3W 1^~~^,. '<s=y. fn' ffigislraf, ^ ^ ,s^?:; fln\ J'n'btina^ ^AL, BSNGH %XTF'&R .,, C.5.NQ /2001 APPLICANT : Sanjay Kujnar Upadhyay aqed 33 years, S/o G.p. Upadhyey Asstt.'I'@scher, Govt. Hicrh School KUGDA, Tgih. & DiStt. DURG (G.G.). VER3U3. NON-APPLIGANT: 1._Stste of Ghhattlsgsrh %rough - Ihe Secretary, School Education Department, Secreseriat (Old D.K HoSpltal), RATPUR (C.G.). Z^r Distt. Educsticm Officer, nURG i'S.Q.} . The pi-lnclpal, ©OVt.HlghScbool, KUQDA, Tah. & Distt. DURG (C.Q.l. Appllcstion u/s 19 of the Sfcate A<3mn •Trlbur.al Act 1985. v—"..:K,-t#'-'v~- "'SSBISi: ^..-.'",'; c^ o, HiGH COURT OF CHMMTriSGARH: Bii-ASPuR Sinaie Bench: Hon'bie Shri iVlanjndra Mohan Shrivastav'a, J, WRiT PETiTiON i'S) N0.3681/2005 oanjay n.urnar upaanyay rc i i i iwNcrc RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh and 2 others iS.——-*—i- C?—-:£?t.w-)/n^4.l^n-i^.^- l/r.n^nt tf^t-i-tl^ -~/»4.:i.:*<.-.^^ rTSScfii: "• OuFi OOmKCTni VGfma, couus^i TOF ine F®l'"ori©r. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. ORDE! (Passed on ...J^r.June, 2010] Petiuoner has filed this petition ciairning the simiiar benefits as have been given to Assistant Teachers appointed in befrween the year 1383-84, who had approached the Tribunat by filing Origlnal Appiication No.2745/1989 (decided on -*^ ^ f'/^n s/^tf\\ 24/08/S2), wherein Tribunai uirected benefits to be given to aii teachers. 2. !t is aiso stated that the State chailenssd the said order before the Suprerns Court in S.L.P. No.6892/1993 vmich was disrnissed vide ordsr datsd 3H/S4. 3. Accordingly, this petition is aiso disposed off with iiberty to the petitioner to rnake representation, if so advised, to consider his c~ase on iis own rnerits and perspeciives. 4. if the petitioner stands on the sarne footing as per order passed by the M.P. Staie Administrative Tribunai in O.A. No.2745/1989 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others v. State 01 ivi.P. and others) and subsequently confirrried by the Supreme Court in S.L.P. (Civii) No.6892/93 by order uated 3/1/84, appropriate order wouiu be passed by the respondents authorify. Sd/- MaBindraM^^ivastava Judge .y Jl l