IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 340 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 434 OF 2008 SHRI. NERLON L. B. ALBUQUERQUE ... Applicant Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Nitin Sardessai, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Ms. Sapna Mordekar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 16th April, 2009 P.C. The original petitioner in Writ Petition No. 434/2008 has taken out this application for speaking to the minutes, contending that in the last paragraph of the Judgment dated 1.4.2009 delivered therein, this Court has made observations about the entitlement of the petitioner to the subsistence allowance. Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner was already under suspension on the date of his dismissal. He states that though the dismissal order is withdrawn, the suspension continues and hence, the petitioner is entitled to arrears of subsistence allowance from the date of suspension till the departmental inquiry is concluded. 2. The learned Advocate General points out that the Government has withdrawn the order of dismissal dated 10.4.2008 and that the order of suspension, pending enquiry, dated 13.3.2008 has revived. 3. After hearing the parties, we are satisfied that the order of suspension dated 13.3.2008 has already revived. The petitioner is, therefore, entitled to arrears of subsistence allowance in terms thereof till the inquiry against him is concluded, in accordance with law. In view of this, we find that the present civil application requires no further orders. It is, accordingly, disposed of. B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. U. D. SALVI, J. ssm.