IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 20TH DECEMBER 2010 / 29TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 8305 of 2010 -------------------------------------- [CRIME NO.402/10 OF HOSDURG POLICE STATION, KASARAGOD DISTRICT] ................ PETITIONER/2ND ACCUSED: ----------------------------------------- B.M.THAHIRA, AGED 36 YEARS, W/O.ABDULRAHIMAN K., BMK(H), AVIYIL, KANHANGAD, HOSDURG VILLAGE, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JIJO PAUL. RESPONDENT/STATE: -------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KANHANGAD, THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI – 31. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.S. HRITHWIK. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: prv. V.RAMKUMAR, J. --------------------------------------------------- Bail Application No.8305 of 2010 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of December, 2010 ORDER The petitioner, who is accused No.2 in Crime No.402 of 2010 of Hosdurg Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 454, 380 & 461 I.P.C., seeks her enlargement on bail. The petitioner was arrested on 03/12/2010. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application submitting inter alia that the 15 Kgs of gold ornaments were looted from Rajadhani Jewellery in Kasaragod after making a hole on the wall of the Jewellery shop. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the propensities of the petitioner and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioner is released on bail, she will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making herself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE skj