IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 11305 of 2008. Decided on: 23.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Dhian Chand … Petitioner. Versus H.R.T.C. and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): It is jointly represented by the learned counsel for the parties that the present lis is covered by the instructions dated 3rd February, 2009 issued by the respondent-Corporation and the law laid down by this Court in CWP(T) No.2882 of 2008, titled Darshan Singh versus H.R.T.C. 2. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. Annexure A-1, dated 12th October, 2004 is quashed and aside. There shall be a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in view of the principles laid down by this Court in the judgment cited above and instructions issued by the respondent-Corporation, dated 3rd February, 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - 2009 on merits without being influenced by the question of delay. In case the petition is decided in favour of the petitioner, he will be entitled to refund of the recoveries already made. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 23, 2010. (sck).