IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 8985 of 2008 Between: Jonnada Ashaiah S/o. Sayanna R/o. H.No. 3-36, Edula Nagulapally, Ramchandrapuram Mandal, Tq.Sangareddy, Dist. Medak. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Govt. of A.P. Rep. by its Principal Secreatary, Revenue Department A.P. Secreatasriat, Hyd., A.P. 2 The Director General of Vigilance & Enforcement, A.P.Secreatariat, Hyd., A.P. 3 The Dist. Collector Medak Dist. at Sanagareddy, Medak Dist. A.P., 4 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Medak Dist., At Sangareddy, Medak Dist. A.p. 5 the Mandal, Revenue Officer, Ramchandrapuram Mandal, Tq.Sangareddy, Dist. Medak, A.P., 6 Station House Officer Police Station, Banooru BDL. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents No. 1 to 3 to take Discilipinary action against the respondet No. 5 and consequently direct the respondent No.4 to rectify the in-corrrect entries made in the Revenue records in respect of the land admeasuring Ac. 2.38 gts. in survey No. 118 and in land admeasuring Ac. 1.09 gts in survey No. 143 at Edula Nagulapally Village, Ramchandrapuram Mandal, Tq. Sanagareddy, Dist. Medak and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.ASADULLA SHAREEF Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 8985 of 2008 Order: The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking a direction to respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to initiate disciplinary action against respondent No.5 and direct respondent No.4 to rectify the entries made in the revenue records in respect of the lands in question, said to have been purchased by the petitioner. The petitioner states that he purchased the land in question under registered sale deed on 01.04.1976, and it is his case that at the instance of some third parties, respondent No.5 has changed the entries in the revenue records to his disadvantage in respect of the land in question, and it his grievance that he approached respondent Nos. 1 to 5 for rectification of the said entries made in the revenue records and also to furnish the pahanies, but in vain. The affidavit filed by the petitioner in support of the writ petition is silent as to on which date he approached the respondents and when they refused to rectify the wrong entries in the revenue records. According to the petitioner, the wrong entries in the revenue records as against the land in question were made by respondent No.5 at the instance of third parties on the basis of forged and fabricated documents presented by them, and that on the basis of the said erroneous entries, the third parties are seeking to interfere with his possession. If that be so, it would not be proper for this Court to give any positive direction, except directing the petitioner to approach the competent civil Court for appropriate relief. Accordingly, with the above observation, writ petition is dismissed. No costs. _________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 23.04.2008 Ksr/Nsr