1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATOIN (o) NO. 734/2010 IN M.C.A. St. No. 9774/10 in C.P. NO. 97/2007 in F.A. NO. 699/2004 Madhavdas Jankidas Mohta ..versus.. Ku. Shrikumar @ Kusumdevi Krushnakumar MOhta and others =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-== Mr. M.M.Agnihotri, counsel for applicant. C ORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 2nd JULY, 2010. Heard. Against the order dated 4.5.2009 passed by this Court in C.A. NO. 25/2009 in Contempt Petition No. 97/07 arising out of First Appeal No. 699/2004 (Madhav vs. Smt. Shrikumari), the application is moved for review. The delay of 373 days is explained. It was the attempt by the appellant before the other Bench in the same proceedings. Since, there was advise to move review petition, the review petition is sought to be moved. The delay is certainly in prosecuting the matter at wrong track and 2 consequently cannot be said to be deliberate or intention. Sufficient reasons are explained. It was informed on 31.3.2010 that review is to be filed. Consequently, delay condoned. Application allowed. Notice in the review petition to the respondents, returnable on 16th August, 2010. Copy be served on the counsel representing the respondents. (K.U.Chandiwal) JUDGE. Rvjalit