IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 22ND NOVEMBER 2007 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA 1929 WP(C).No. 29493 of 2007(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ M.U. SCARIA, MAPPANATH HOUSE, SEETHA MOUND POST, PULPALLY, WAYANAD. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENTS: ------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, WAYANAD. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. M.R. SABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1- TRUE COPY OF THE REGULAR PERMIT ISSUED TO THE petitioner VALID UPTO 19.11.09 EXT.P2- TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ION MVAA.NO.476/2006 EXT.P3- TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION OF THE RTA DTED 12.4.07 GRANTING VARIATION TO THE PETITIONER'S SERVICE IN COMPLIANCE WITH EXT.P2 (TRUE COPY) P.A TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J ------------------- W.P.(C). 29493/2007 -------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of November, 2007 JUDGMENT By Ext.P2 judgment, variation was granted subject to settlement of timings. It is submitted by the petitioner that since then timing has been settled but variation is not endorsed. It is for that reason, this writ petition has been filed. 2. Learned Government Pleader submits that they have decided to challenge Ext.P2 and that is why the delay. The decision to challenge Ext.P2 dated 28th November, 2006, cannot now be a reason for further postponing the implementation of the decision. 3. However, without prejudice to whatever remedies available to the respondent against Ext.P2, it is directed that variation granted by Ext.P2 shall be endorsed within two weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC Judge mrcs