IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO:12429 of 2005 Between: N. Rambabu, S/o. Satyanarayana, R/o. Elchuru Post, Santhamaguluru Mandal, Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Panchayat Officer-cum-Member Convenor, District Level Sand Committee, Guntur, Guntur District. 2 the Joint Collector, Guntur, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR. P.RAMAKRISHNA FOR MR.C.V.R.RUDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following : ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring action of the respondents in not disclosing the area earmarked for pattas and not fixing the boundaries, of Reach No.5, covering the area from 17.8 to 34.2 KM at Kollipara Village of Krishna River, pursuant to the auction notification issued by the 1st respondent in Rc.No.675/2005-G2 dated 31.5.2005, inviting tenders for leasehold rights to quarry sand, as arbitrary, illegal, colourable exercise of power and violative of the Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to finalise the leasehold rights to quarry sand at Reach No.5, covering the area from 17.8 to 34.2 KM at Kollipara Village of Krishna River.” At the hearing, Sri P.Ramakrishna, learned counsel representing Sri C.V.R.Rudra Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, interim order, dated 14.06.2005 is vacated and WPMP.No.15810 of 2005 is dismissed. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 3rd JULY, 2008. kvni