gst 1 wp9079.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO. 9079 OF 2010. Baban Khandu Saikar & Ors. .... .... .... Petitioners. V/s Mahatma Phule Vasatigrih, Pune & Ors. ... .... Respondents. Mr.Avinash B. Avhad, Adv. For the petitioners. CORAM: B.R.GAVAI, J. 12th Jan., 2011. PC: The petitioner challenges the order dated 21.9.2010 by which the application filed by the respondent-plaintiff for joining certain trustees as plaintiff came to be allowed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had taken preliminary objection regarding non-joinder of necessary party. It is submitted that the application which is allowed had been filed to cure the lacuna that too at the fag end of the trial. The order impugned is purely interlocutory order. The petitioner would also have an opportunity to challenge the same in the event outcome of the suit is against him under Order 43 Rule 1A of the Civil Procedure Code. Hence Writ Petition stands disposed of with aforesaid observations.