IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 7TH APRIL 2008 / 18TH CHAITHRA 1930 W.P(C).No. 11010 of 2008(I) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- SAJEEV MATHEW, GOVT. CONTRACTOR CHERUMATTATHIL HOUSE, MUDAVOOR P.O. MUVATTUPUZHA -686 669. BY ADV. SRI.K.L.VARGHESE SMT.SANTHA VARGHESE SRI.P.B.AJOY RESPONDENT: --------------- M/S. MALABAR CEMENTS LTD., WALAYAR PALAKKAD -678 624, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR. BY ADV. SRI. B.S. KRISHNAN (SR.), SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 11010 OF 2008 I ==================== Dated this the 7th day of April, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is a contractor claiming payment for the works that he has executed for the respondent. According to the petitioner, amount is due towards final bill, security deposit and also EMD. Ext.P1 is the final bill which indicates his claim as well. However, it is not seen that the respondent has taken a final decision in so far as the claims raised by the petitioner is concerned. It is seen that when Ext.P3 representation was made, that was replied by Ext.P4 stating that in view of the absence of records, they are not in a position to consider the claim of the petitioner. Petitioner has again made a representation as per Ext.P5. It is submitted that there has not been any progress in the matter. 2. In view of the pendency of the matter as above, I dispose of this writ petition, directing that the respondent shall consider the claim urged by the petitioner in Exts. P3 and P5. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a period of four weeks of WPC 11010/08 :2 : production of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp