IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRI APPLICATION NO. 5468 OF 2011In APEALST/657/2011 NIRANJANSING BHARATSING DUDHANI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAH ... Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Jadhav Kailas B APP for Respondents: Mr. S.N.Kendre ... CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. Dated: December 20, 2011 ... PER COURT :- 1. Heard learned respective counsel for the parties. 2. This is an application preferred preferred by the applicant for condonation of 24 days delay, caused in filing accompanying application, seeking leave to file appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal. 3. For the reasons stated in the application, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily. Moreover, it also appears that said delay is not wilful, deliberate and intentional and same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 4. In the result, present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ thereof and delay of 24 days caused in filing accompanying application, seeking leave to file appeal, is condoned and present application stands disposed of accordingly. ( SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. ) ... aaa/-