IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 27TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 5TH ASWINA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 149 of 2011(S) --------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.30740/2010 DATED 14/10/2010 ................ PETITIONER / PETITIONER : ------------------------------------------ C.K.JYOTHIRAJ, AGED 41 YRS, S/O. C.V. KUNJIKKUTTAN, SANDHYA NIVAS, C.M.C.-18, CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DIST. BY ADV. SRI. K. RAMANATHAN RESPONDENT / RESPONDENT I : ----------------------------------------------- THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE RTO, ALAPPUZHA-688 001. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. B. VINOD THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- Con.Case(C).No. 149 of 2011(S) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURE'S ANNEXURE A1 : COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 30740 DATED 14.10.2010. ANNEXURE A2 : COPY OF THE DECISION OF THE RTA MEETING HELD ON 12.11.2010 DATED 22.12.2010. ANNEXURE A3 : JUDGMENT IN O.S. 286/06 BY THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF'S COURT, CHERTHALA. ANNEXURE A4 : COPY OF THE DECISION OF RTA MEETING HELD ON 09.02.2010. ANNEXURE A5 : COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 11.01.2011 FILED THE DEVANANDA BHAT. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURE'S - NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mn C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. ---------------------------- Cont. Case (C)No.149 of 2011 ---------------------------- Dated 27th September, 2011 JUDGMENT As per judgment dated 14.10.2010 in W.P.(C)No.30740 of 2010 this Court directed the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 application referred as such thereunder. When this matter is taken up for consideration today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that, in fact, the said application was considered and an order was passed. However, he is having grievances against the said order. The learned Government Pleader submitted that raising his grievances against the order passed on Ext.P3 application the petitioner has filed W.P.(C)No.12848 of 2011. This is recorded and accordingly, this contempt case is closed. It will be open to the petitioner to pursue with W.P.(C)No.12848 of 2011, challenging the order passed on Ext.P3 application. Sd/- C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge TKS