IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.R. No. 02 of 2011. Decided on 10th March, 2011. _____________________________________________________ Deepak Goel and Others. …Petitioners. -Versus- Rajinder Kumar and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioners. : Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate. For respondents No. 1,3, 4 & 5. : Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate. For respondents No. 2. : Mr. Virender Singh Chauhan, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): With the consent of parties, the impugned order dated 28.12.2010, rendered in Rent Controller’s Case No. 17-2 of 1997/96, Rent Appeal No. 8-S/13(b) of 2007, is set aside. The Appellate Authority (II), Shimla, H.P. is directed to decide the matter afresh in accordance with law, within a period of four months from today. While taking the decision, the Appellate Authority (II), Shimla, H.P. shall also take into consideration the law laid down by this Court in Smt. Surinder Kaur Versus Mohinder Pal Singh, Indian Law Reports (Himachal Series) (1976), 620, H.P.. The parties are directed to appear before the learned Appellate Authority (II), Shimla, H.P. on 28th March, 2011. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge March 10, 2011. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No.