IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9281 of 2008 SAHID RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 7.8.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, opposite party no.2 and the State. The petitioner is an accused for the offence under sections 498A and 494 of the Indian Penal Code. It is stated on behalf of the petitioner that no offence under section 494 of the Indian Penal Code is made out. However, the allegation in the complaint is of demand of money that too after twenty years of his marriage has been made for ulterior purpose. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2, on the other hand, submits that the petitioner has married second lady causing all sorts of difficulty in her marriage life whereas she is willing to live with the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client is also ready to keep opposite party no.2 like a legally wedded wife. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is directed that in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, Sahid Rai, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub.Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Complaint Case No.460 of 2007 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal procedure. Since it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner 2 that his client is ready and willing to keep opposite party no.2 as his legally weeded wife, it will be open for the opposite party no.2 to live with him. In case the petitioner is found to have violated the undertaking, it will be open for opposite party no.2 to take steps for cancellation of bail on reasonable grounds. Md.S. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)