:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER CHAMBER CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1578 OF 2006 SUMMONS NO. 1578 OF 2006 SUMMONS NO. 1578 OF 2006 IN IN IN EXECUTION EXECUTION EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 306 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 306 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 306 OF 2005 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1827 OF 2004 SUIT NO. 1827 OF 2004 SUIT NO. 1827 OF 2004 Mrs. Parvana Dara Mistry. ...Plaintiff. V/s. Ms. Manucher @ Minoo Khodayar Kharani & Ors. ...Defendants. And Smt. Minal Mahandrakumar Mehta. ... Applicant. Mr. G.B. Kedia for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. 15TH 15TH 15TH OCTOBER 2008. OCTOBER 2008. OCTOBER 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . Mr. Kedia, learned Advocate appearing for the Plaintiff/Decree Holder states that the Decree Holder has received the entire sum under the decree and the decree is marked satisfied. Therefore, the Chamber Summons does not survive and is dismissed as infructuous. (S.C. (S.C. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.)