IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 7743 of 2006 Between: E.Sudarshan Goud S/o.Narayana R/o.Amadaguntla Village, Kodumuru Mandal, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Kurnool District, Kurnool, 3 The Superintendent of Prohibition and Excise, Kurnool. 4 The Inspector, Prohibition and Excise, Kodumuru, Kurnool District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the Respondents in not considering the aplication of the petitioner for grant of TFT license for the year 2004-05 and 2005-06 in respect of Amadaguntla vilage, Kodumuru Mandal, Kurnool District as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the Respondents to consider the application of the Petitioner for grant of TFT license in respect of Amadaguntla village, Kodumuru Mandal, Kurnool District and pass such other order or orders which are deemed fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.B.RAM MOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: Sri Sunil, Advocate representing Sri C.B. Ram Mohan Reddy, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. The interim order granted by this Court on 30.8.2007 stands dissolved. There shall be no order as to costs. GODA RAGHURAM, J Date: 31.7.2008 cvm