IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5705 of 2011 1. PINKU KUMAR MISHRA, SON OF KRISHNA MOHAN MISHRA. 2. TANTAN MISHRA, SON OF KRISHNA MOHAN MISHRA. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 3. 24.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Heard both sides. Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with Saharsa P.S.case No. 404/2010 under sections 364 A, 120 B & 34 of the Indian Penal Code. From the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioners and the materials reflected from the impugned order as well as the statement of the victim recorded under section 164 of Cr.P.C. as contained in Annexure -2, it appears that there is no cogent material against the petitioner No.2 inasmuch as he has not been named as an accused having some role to play in kidnapping of the victim. Materials however indicate incriminating circumstance against the petitioner No.1.The prayer for anticipatory bail made on behalf of petitioner No.1, Pikku Kumar Mishra stands rejected. 2 In the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks, petitioner No.2, Tantan Mishra shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Saharsa P.S. Case No. 404/2010 subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. with further condition that in each case one of the bailers shall be own close family member of the petitioners. Nitesh ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)