CWP No. 8195 of 1989 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 8195 of 1989 Date of decision: 4.2.2011 Baksish Singh …..Petitioner vs. The Director, Consolidation of Holdings and another …..Respondents CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: - Mr. M.L.Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. T.P. S. Tung, Advocate for respondent No. 2 HEMANT GUPTA, J Challenge in the present petition is to an order passed by Director, Consolidation of Holdings on 28.4.1989 in exercise of the powers under Section 42 of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948. Vide the aforesaid order, the area taken out from the holdings of Jagir Singh s/o Ishar Singh was ordered to be restored and an alternate passage was provided for the access to the petitioner and the respondent herein from the pacca road. The grievance of respondent No. 2 Jagir Singh is that his area has been de-linked from the pacca road by withdrawing the area from him. He has prayed that his area in Khasra No. 1663 may be returned to him and Bakshish Singh may be compensated from Khasra Nos. 1426 to 1427. It is the said grievance which has been addressed by the Director Consolidation finding that the grievance of Jagir Singh as genuine. It was found that the 1 CWP No. 8195 of 1989 amendments now going to be made, the area of Jagir Singh and Bakshish Singh will be linked with the pacca road. The reasoning given by learned Director Consolidation in the order dated 28.4.1989 cannot be said to be suffering from any patent illegality or material irregularity. No meaningful argument could be raised as to how the interest of the present petitioner is prejudiced in any manner with the order passed by learned Director Consolidation vide the order impugned. In view of the said fact, I do not find any ground to interfere in the order passed by the authorities under the Act, in exercise of the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court. Dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 4.2.2011 preeti 2