IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI WRIT PETITION NO : 16893 of 1991 Between: The Managing Committee of Sri Ram Mutt(Big) Brahmapuri Nizamabad, rep. by its Secretary Sri Narahar Rao Mallorkar ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Asst, Commissioner of Endowments Department, Nizamabad. 2 Sri Ram Mutt (big) Brahmapuri Nizamabad, Town & Mandal Nizamabad, Dist. rep. by person-in-charge K. Gangadhar. R2 is impleaded as per court order in WPMP 12354/02 dt. 12/12/02 .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings in Rc.No. A/685/83 dated 19.12.1983 of the respondent herein as bad, illegal and void the same and be pleased to issue any other writ or order or direction as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.D.V.SITARAMAMURTHY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following O R D E R: The impugned order proceedings only directed to show cause why action should not be taken against the petitioner for mismanagement of mutt properties and for misguiding the department sustaining loss. It is submitted by learned counsel for the respondents that the life of the committee is already over and the writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the fact that the impugned proceedings are only a show cause notice, I feel this writ petition is not maintainable, which is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. _________________ (Bilal Nazki,J) 24th March, 2005 vrn To 1 The Assistant Commissioner of Endowments Department, Nizamabad. 2 Two C.Cs to the G.P. for Endowments, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT) 3 Two C.D copies.