IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14719 of 2009 1. DHARMRAJ DAS,son of late Nanhku Das 2. Sanful Devi,wife of Sharmraj Das 3. Rambali Das 4. Madan Das 5. Raj Kumar Das 3 to 5 sons of Dharamraj Das All resident of village-Bhalua,P.S.- Dobhi,District-Gaya. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 30-04-2009 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the prayer for anticipatory bail in respect of petitioners no.1 and 4 (Dharmraj Das and Madan Das) as they have been arrested. Permission is granted. This application is dismissed as withdrawn as against petitioners no.1 and 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners no.2, 3 & 5 and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the case has been lodged due to differences between the informant and her husband but upon rest of the family members making an allegation of Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Witch(Daain) Practices Act only due to differences between both the families. Her husband has dared to save her interest. In the suggested facts and circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail in respect of petitioners no.2, 3 & 5 is allowed. In case of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Sherghati(Dhobi)P.S.Case No.338 of 2008, the above named petitioners no.2, 3 & 5 (Sanful Devi, Rambali Das and Raj Kumar Das 2 respectively) shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )