IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.1370 of 1996 Between: B. Linga Goud, S/o Raja Goud, Hindu R/O Kothapalli Village , Doulathabad Mandal, Medak District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Siddipet Division, Medak District. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Doulathabad Mandal, Medak District. 3 Chintakindi Narasaiah, S/o Ramaiah, R/o Temkampalli, H/O Kothapalli, Doulathabad Mandal, Medak District. (Writ Petition as against R3 is dismissed for default as per the Court Orders dated 22.03.2000) .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction preferably one the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 herein contemplating to evict the petitioner from the 1and to an extent of Ac.1.00 in S.No.490 of kothapalli village, Doulathabad Mandal, Medak District as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents herein not to interfere with the petitioner’s possession and enjoyment in respect of the said land. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. J. KANAKAIAH Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.3: --- The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of respondents 1 and 2 in taking steps to evict the petitioner from the land admeasuring Ac.1.00 in Survey No.490 situated at Kothapalli village, Doulathabad Mandal, Medak District as illegal. In the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2, it is stated that the petitioner has purchased the land from the 3rd respondent and a certificate was also issued under Section 13(B) of the Record of Rights Act, 1971 vide Certificate No.B/799/94, dated 27.05.1994 and he is in possession of the land in question. In view of the said averment in the counter-affidavit, the respondents 1 and 2 are directed not to interfere with the possession of the land in question by the petitioner. Subject to above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _____________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J. Date: 25.02.2005 Nsr ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Siddipet Division, Medak District. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Doulathabad Mandal, Medak District. 3 Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of AP, Hyderabad (OUT) 4 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VEENA}