^ c ^-1 <^^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR J^2T}- WRIT PETITION (Sl No. /2009 PETITIONER €^--f. ^^"'^ ^^^•"""' •^••-;;, ^y ^••- ^' ^y^- RESPONDENTS: Mahadev Das Vaishnav S/o Shri Narayan Das Vaishnav, aged about 46 years, Upper Division Teacher (Hindi) Government Middle School, Reda (D) Block Dabhara District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS r' 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, School Education Department, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) r"" 2. Director, Lok Shikshan Sanchanalaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) <" 3. District Education Officer, District Janjgir-Champa (Chhattisgarh) WMT UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ h-^l^- HSGH COURT OF CHHATTlSGARhL:^JLASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.4315 OF 2009 PETiTiO^ER Smt. Jitender Lamba Versus ReSPONDENTS Staie of Chhattisgarh & Others And W.P.(S) Nos.5981,5448, S450, 5451, 5483, 5484, 5485, 5584,575S,5785, 57S3, 5805, 5813, 5815, §819,5820, 5825, 5838, 5889, 5890, 5891, S018, 5094,5204, S339, 6340, S423,S438, S290,5518, 5533, 5578,5S11, 5SS1, SS91,5811, 5817,5927, 5930, SS21 & SS22 of 2009. (Wnt Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of indaa) Singie Sench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihoifi, J. Present :• Shri H.B. AgrawaS, Sr. Advocate with Ms Meera Jalswai, Shri P.P. Sahu, Shri Mateen Siddlqui, Shri P.R. Patankar, Shri Manoj Paranjape, Shri Uttam Pandey, Shri C.J.K. Rao, Shri Roop Nsik, Shri A.S. Rajput, Shri K.S. Pawar, Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Shri R.R. Soni, Shri V.K. Pandey and Shri Ashwanl Shukls, Advocates for the respective petitioners. Shri Yash^vant Singh Thakur, Dy. Advocate General for the State of Chhattlsgarh and its authonties. ORDERiCRAU (Passed on this 12th day of November, 2009) 1. Wiih the consent of leamed counseS appearing tor the parties, the petations are heard tinally. 2. !n this batch of matters it has been biought to the notice of the Court that the traiisfer orders have been passed Without compSying with the pollcy and In some cases the ordsrs having been executed a2so require reconsideration. Shri Thakur, learned Dy. Advocate Generai appearing for the State, on instructioa-is, very falrly submits that all the cases of the petitloners pending conssderatlon before thls Court shali be considered afresh, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, to examine asto whether the Sransfer 3. ^ ^»y' orders have been passed in accordasnce with the poiicy and tiSS that time the peutioners herein shali not be dssturbed. 4. in view of foregoing, accordlng to Searned counsel appearing for the respective petstioners nothing survives m these petitlons for adjudication. 5. AccordingSy, She petitions being W.P. (S) <Mos.431S, 5981, 5448, 5450, 5451, §483,5484, 5485, 5584, 5756, 5785;5793, 5805, 5813, 5815, 5819, 5820, 5825, 5839, 5889, 5890, 5891, 6018, 5094,8204, S33S,6340, S423, 6438, 5290, 5518, 5533, 5578, 5611,5SS1, 5S91, 5811, 5817, 5327, 5930, SS21 & SS22 of 2009 are dlsposed of. However, on the basis of submissiors made by the iearned Dy. Advocate General. It is made ciear that the peutioners herein shali continue on their respective piaces of postlng, as obtains today, tiil disposal of their respectlve cases, in accordance with law and on Its own merlts. 6. No order asto costs- _ Gowri Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge /~