IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP-T No. 14639/2008 Decided on:21.5.2010 _____________________________________________ Ms. Pooja. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. D.P. Gupta, Advocate vice Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. A.G. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). The limited prayer made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner is that the case of the petitioner is required to be considered by the State Government as per Annexures A-9 and A-10 dated 28.8.2001 and 30.3.1999, respectively whereby similarly situate persons have been given relaxation in educational qualification while taking over their 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 services as Lecturer (College Cadre). This limited prayer is not opposed by the respondent-State. Consequently, respondent-State is directed to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of notifications dated 28.8.2001 (Annexure A-9) and 30.3.1999 (Annexure A-10) within a period of ten weeks from today. No other point was urged. In view of above observations, the petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 21.5.2010 *awasthi*