// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7857/2008 With S.B. Civil Misc. Stay Appl. No.1674/2008 Bhagwan Sahai Saini S/o Shri Thakarsi Versus Presiding Officer, Rent Tribunal, Alwar and Another Date of Order ::: 26.08.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Mukesh Pal, Advocate, for Shri Jitendra Sharma, Counsel for petitioner #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ petition, on behalf of the tenant-petitioner, is directed against the impugned order rejecting his application under Section 10 of the CPC. The learned counsel for the petitioner admits that the present suit was filed earlier than the another suit for declaration. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner in the light of reasons assigned by the trial court for rejecting his application and, after considering the same, I find that the impugned order passed by the trial court is perfectly // 2 // justified and in accordance with the law and no interference in it is called for. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed in limine. Consequent upon dismissal of the writ petition, the stay application, filed therewith, does not survive and the same is also dismissed. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//