IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39575 of 2010 Nayab Ansari, Son of Jaldin Ansari, Resident of Village Bhanpur, P.S. Patherwa, District Kushinagar (U.P.) -------Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar. 2.Kasida Khatoon, Wife of Nabab Ansari, R/o Village Bhanpur, P.S. Patherwa, District Kusinagar (Uttar Pradesh). At present residing at Bint Makun Ansari, R/o Village Sukul Dumar, P.S. Bhore, District Gopalganj. Opposite Parties ------------------ 05/- 19/12/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the complainant-opposite party no. 2 and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code, is one of the named accused in this case being husband of the complainant-opposite party no. 2 with allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. Submission on behalf of the Bar is that the couple is ready and willing to join company of each other and reside together. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of parties filing joint petition of compromise or petitioner files individual application before the court below stating such intention, in the event of his arrest/surrender within four weeks, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj, in connection with C. Case No. 2243 of 2007 (Trial No. 1783/2010), subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition to attend the court regularly till disposal of the case and in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Further, additional condition, in the event of filing joint petition of compromise or individual petition on behalf of the petitioner, stating such intention, the court below on receipt of positive response from the complainant-opposite party no. 2 permit the couple to reside at their place of choice on the condition to report personally to the court below on or before 05th January, 2012 for the purpose and only after being satisfied of their conduct for a reasonable period, the court below shall pass appropriate order in accordance with law. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court below through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)