IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12728 of 2011 RAJ KUMR CHAUDHARY AND ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 04.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 323, 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioners is that the petitioners took Rs. 1,10,000/- as loan from the complainant with an undertaking on non judicial stamp paper that they will return the amount by 30.01.2008. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that from the petitioners’ side an F.I.R. was lodged on 24.02.2008 alleging offences under Sections 342, 323, 387/34 of the I.P.C. in which 164 Cr. P.C. statement of Raj Kumar Choudhary (petitioner no. 1) was recorded on 25.02.2008 in which he alleged accusation against the present complainant when on 27.02.2008 the present complaint has been 2 filed. Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners, Raj Kumar Chaudhary and Om Prakash Chaudhary, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 116 of 2008 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Jehanabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)