C.R. No.5893 of 2003 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.5893 of 2003 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.10.2009 Satbir and others .....Petitioners Versus Shiv Shanker ...Respondent 2. C.R. No.5894 of 2003 (O&M) Rajbir and others .....Petitioners Versus Krishan ....Respondent Present: None for the parties. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) C.R. No.5893 of 2003 1. The revision is filed against the order of the Appellate Court dismissing the appeal filed by the defendants against the order of injunction granted by the trial Court at the interlocutory stage. The suit is of the year 1993 and the interlocutory application for injunction had been decided on 11.01.2003. More than 16 years have passed since the institution of the suit and the status quo as regards the enjoyment namely of the prima facie C.R. No.5893 of 2003 (O&M) -2- contention for possession and title as having been established in favour of the plaintiff before the trial Court and the Appellate Court would not require to be disturbed. The civil revision petition in C.R. No.5893 of 2003 is dismissed. It shall be the endeavour of the trial Court to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of six months from the date when the records are received. C.R. No.5894 of 2003 2. The civil revision is against the direction by the Court directing the civil imprisonment of the petitioners for alleged violation of the order of injunction. There is no representation for either side at the time when the matter is called. I see from the order that the operation of order of the Court directing imprisonment had been stayed. The direction as to civil imprisonment shall stand abated till the conclusion of the trial and further steps would be taken subject to the final outcome of the decision in the suit. 3. The impugned order is set aside and the civil revision petition is disposed of as such. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE October 22, 2009 Pankaj*