WPMS No. 1439 of 2009 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Shri D.S. Mehta, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri S.C. Bhatt, Advocate for the respondent. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By means of this petition, moved under Article 226 read with 227 of Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 10.07.2009, passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Nainital, in Execution Case No. 03 of 2009, Vidya Mehta Vs. Sundar Singh Mehta. From the perusal of the papers on record, it appears that the parties to litigation entered into compromise in suit No. 82 of 2005, on 17.10.2006. The respondent appears to have filed execution application for execution of compromise decree, passed by the trial court (Judge, Family Court, Nainital). Learned counsel for the petitioner (judgment debtor) argued that terms of compromise are not fulfilled by respondent, as such, she is not entitled to execution of the decree. Said fact has been examined by the executing court. This Court under its jurisdiction under Article 226/227 of Constitution of India, cannot examine as to whether the terms of compromise were complied with factually or not. This Court does not find any error of law committed by the executing court. Therefore, the petition is dismissed summarily. (Stay application No. 7441 of 2009, also stands dismissed). (P. C. P., J.) Dt. 27.08.2009 S