IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15488 of 2009 TARESHWAR THAKUR, SON OF LATE CHATURBHUJ THAKUR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND POST OFFICE BALIA, POLICE STATION BASNAHI (VIA MUNGUAR) AND DISTRICT SAHARSA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND COMMISSIONER (DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT) GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, STATE OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DIRECTOR, PROVIDENT FUND, PANT BHAWAN, STATE OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT, OFFICER, DISTRICT MADHEPURA. 5. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, DISTRICT MADHEPURA. 6. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, VEER CHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA. 7. THE TREASURY OFFICER, DISTRICT MADHEPURA. 8. THE DEAD MASTER, MIDDLE SCHOOL, KUMARGANJ, BLOCK UDA KISHANGANJ (WEST) DISTRICT MADHEPURA. ----------- 02. 16.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State as also the Accountant General. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the respondent – Accountant General has issued authorization memo for payment of the pension, gratuity and also commuted value of pension but by inadvertence the name of the petitioner has been mentioned as Tarkeshwar Thakur instead of Tareshwar Thakur. He further submits that although the petitioner has represented before the Accountant General for necessary correction of the name but the same has not been done as yet. However, for expediting the matter, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 6 for necessary correction. The other grievances of the petitioner is with regard to the payment of lesser amount towards provident fund dues and also arrears of pension. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his above claims, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 4 enclosing the copy of the relevant documents if any, in support of such claim along with certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks from today. In case such representations are filed, the respondent no. 4 shall consider each of the claims raised by the petitioner in his representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the pending claims of the petitioner could be settled without delay. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)