IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32444 of 2010 BAIJNATH SHARMA @ SHUKHARI SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 28.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State as well as learned counsel for the complainant. It is alleged that petitioner took rupees one lacs and executed some documents in receipt of the aforesaid money on the pretext to execute sale deeds in favour of the complainant in the year 2003 but subsequently he did not execute the sale deed and fled away with the aforesaid amount. Thereafter, the complainant filed a complaint case in the year 2008 i.e. after five years of the alleged occurrence. Without giving any finding upon the merit of the case, I think it proper to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail petition is allowed and it is ordered that above stated petitioners- in the event of their arrest / surrender within 30 days from receipt of the order, in connection with Complaint Case No.631 of 2008, shall be released on bail 2 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. PN/AKV ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)