.[1]. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.737 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1009 OF 1999 National Bank of Agriculture and Rural Development ...Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and 3 Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr.S.S.Pandit, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms.S.M.Dandekar, AGP, for Respondent Nos.1 to 3-State. .... CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 21, 2006. DECEMBER 21, 2006. DECEMBER 21, 2006. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 to 3-State. None appears for Respondent No.4, though served. The learned counsel for the Petitioner undertakes to file affidavit of service within a period of two weeks from today. 2. By this Notice of Motion, the petitioner is seeking recall of our order dated 13th November, 2006 whereby the above Petition was dismissed in .[2]. default. 3. Perused the affidavit in support of the Motion. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Motion, sufficient cause is made out. There is no negligence, omission or inaction on the part of the petitioner in prosecuting the above matter. Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 4. Place the above Petition on board for final hearing on 22nd January, 2007. [DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]