IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38953 of 2008 FUL KUMAR YADAV @ FULO YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.10.2008 Heard Sri Shiv Shankar Prasad, Advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The case is under Sections 384 etc IPC and 25 etc of the Arms Act. Admittedly, the recovery is by the informant and others and the contention is that the recovery of the arms by the general public makes the offence bailable in the light of the provisions of Section 37 of the Arms Act. The further contention is that in fact there was some heated exchange between the parties on the payment of the price of fish which had been purchased by the accused persons and on that account they were assaulted and handed over to the police by implanting an illegal arms. Regard being had to the facts of the case and the contentions, let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.3,000/-(three thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Katihar in Barari P.S.Case No.41 of 2008. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )