IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 27158 of 2006 Between: Oleti Ravi Sekhar, s/o Venkateswara Rao, r/o H.No.5-11-25, Priyadharshini Colony, Opp:Gas Plant, A.P.Steel, Paloncha, Khammam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Chief Engineer (O&M), Kothagudem Thermal Power Station, Vth Stage, Paloncha, Khammam District. 2 The Chief General Manager (HRD), A.P.Power Generating Corporation, Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. 3 The Chairman and Managing Director, A.P.Generating Corporation, Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to appoint the petitioner as Mazdoor/Junior Plant Attendant or in any other suitable post and regularize the services of the petitioner in the respondent Board in terms of G.O.Ms.No.41 Labour, Employment, Training and Factories ( Gas.II) Department dated 23-09-1996 and also in terms of B.P.(P&G-Per) Ms.No.37 dated 18-05-1997, B.P.(P&G-Per) Ms.No.260 dated 19-12-1997, B.P. (P&G-per) Ms.No.36 dated 18-05-1997 and also B.P.(P&G-per) Ms.No.272 dated 31-12-1997 and pay all the service beneﬁts from the date of his entry into service and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in service in the post in which the petitioner is working till his services are regularized on permanent basis. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.NARENDER Counsel for the Respondent No.: SMTE.URMILA The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P. No. 27158 of 2006 O R D E R: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in a similar case i.e. P.S. Rama Krishna v. Member Secretary, A.P. Power Generation Corporation Limited (2004 (2) ALT 514), this Court directed the petitioners therein to approach the Industrial Tribunal and work out the remedies available to them under the law and, therefore, the petitioner is intending to approach the Labour Court. Under those circumstances, the writ petition is closed, leaving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Industrial Tribunal and work out his remedies as available under the law. C.V. RAMULU, J. Date: 5-11-2008. MVB.