IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10531 of 1996 1. SIKANDAR RAM Son of Sheodutt Ram, resident of village Chanari, P.S. Jitna, District- East Champaran. 2. Lal Mohan Baitha son of Sheonath Baitha, resident of village Chhora Dano, P.S.- Chhora Dano, District- East Champaran. 3. Sahdeo Ram Son of Late Ram Bilash Ram, resident of village Chiraya, P.O. and P.S.- Chiraya, District- East Champaran. ----------- Petitioners. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Superintendent of Education, Motihari, East Champaran. ----------- Respondents. ----------- 4 11.11.2008 Petitioners 1, 2 and 3 were appointed as Assistant Teachers on 29.3.1989, 13.6.1989 and 14.2.1991 respectively. After appointment of the petitioners they were sent for training by the Government and they received the teachers training in the session 1994-95. During the period of training the petitioners were given stipend of Rs. 50/-. This writ application has been filed making a prayer therein that the petitioners are entitled to receive the full pay during the period of training. This Court in various decisions namely Surendra Paswan Vs. State of Bihar reported in 1994(2) PLJR 42 and in another decision in CWJC No. 3626 of 1993 and analogous cases disposed of on 18.8.2008 has already decided that since there was a relationship of 2 employer and employees between the teachers undergoing training and the State authorities, they could not have been paid a pittance as stipend. In view of the judgments of this Court aforesaid, the writ application is allowed and the Director, Primary Education should calculate and make payment of difference of salary which the petitioners are entitled to for the period when they were undergoing training. The payment should be made within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)