d¢I%// IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.(S)No. L/%é? 12007 g Laxmi Kfdikal D/o. A.B. ikal, PETITIONER Aged about 30 years, Ft/o. Maranatha Church Road, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (CG) ERSUS RESPONDENTS 1] State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) /’ 2] Secretary, Panchayat 85 Gramin Vikas Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhawan, v aipur, District Raipur (CG) 3] Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District /Raipur (CG) 4] Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Jagdalpur, District / Bastar (CG) 5] Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Jagdalpur, Bastar Division, District Bastar (CG) ,/’ 6] Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Jagclalpur, District Bastar (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1] PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER (§)_ As stated above in the cause title. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENT (S): As stated above in the cause title. HK’iH COURT OF CHHATTESGARH AT BILASFUR PE'I‘ITIONER RESPONDE ‘Tb Present: WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 4769 ofZ'OO’] Laxmi Kudikal. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. SE: Emi’bie Shri Satish k Agnihotri. 3. $hri Manoi Paranjpa. Advocate fOr the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel La‘v‘vjm‘ for tha Siateirespondems. 0R?)ER (ORAE (Passed 0i: 16m ciay of Elms: 20 1 1) ‘ Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that the petitioner has alreaciy continued at the origina} place 0fp0$ting for almost four vears on accouni; of intarim order granted by ibis Court 17.082007. The State/responéents may be granted libeziy 1o pass appropi‘iate orders keeping in View pubiie interest and aciministrative exigency. Shri Bhaduri fmther submits that the State/respondents shall not insist 11pm compiiaiice ofthe impugned order dated 27.07.20G7 (Aimexui‘e P/3) in respect Ofthe petitioner. At this stage, when no etfeet oouid be given to the impugied order datezi 27.07.2007 (Amexure PB) on account of the interim order dated 27.08.2G10, thus, it is not necessary to go into legaiity and validity ot'the ai‘orestated iiiiptlgneti order. In View of the above, according to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingiy, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Interim ieiiet' granted on 17.08.2G07 is vacated. Amit WRII PE‘TIHON UN} )ER AR’HCLE 226 OF 1H}: CONSTITUHON OF iNDlA