?et§t§oae¥ i-§§GH CGURT OF CHHATTI3GARH: B!LA$PUR Writ PetitiOi'i is) NO. 37 of 26G? Smt. Nirmala Sharma, Wife of Late Shri Narendra Sharma, Aged about 44 years, Assis€ant Teacher, Government Primary $chcs§, Ehaiapara, Naiia, Biock Nawagarh, Dist. Janjgir — Champa‘0G. Versus 1) State of Chhattisgarh, ’chrough ihe Seweta'ry, Education Depam'nent, D.KS. Bhawan, Ramur, CG. 2‘; The Difector of Pubiic nstruction, Raipur, CG. 3) The Districi Education Ofacer, Dis’mst Janjgir-Champa CG. 4} The Biock Educaticn Officei', Biock - Nawagarh, Distric Janjgir-Champa, CG. Respaadents (WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTlTUTlON OF 1ND!A FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT EN NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE) PRESENT: ORDER {Passed an 24WAprn 2w?) i. The question of law involved herein as to whether the petitioner is entitled to reguiar pay scaie wifh effect from the date of initiai appointment or from the date of compietion of probation period. (SB: Hon'iale Sim Justice gatish K. Agmihotri) $hri A. Shukia, counsei for the petitionet Shri $ushii Dube\ , Govt. Advocaée fer respondents/$tate. I / ..... \ It Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as weii as for the State/respondents jointly submii that ihe facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same i0 that of in Writ Petition (S) No. 5976 of 2006 (Sushii Tiwari & others Vs. State Govt. of Chhaitisgarh & others), which was: ailowed vicie order dated 7-1 1 —2006. In View of the above stated submission made by learned counsei for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same Raju terms. No enter as to costs. \ Sci/- Satish K. Agnihotri ‘ Judge