IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7101 of 2011 Nathun Prasad Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 04. 27.07.2011 Heard. This is an application seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to Opposite Party nos. 2 and 3, in connection with Civil Lines P.S. Case No. 18/2009, vide order dated 13.08.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 25082/2010 by this court, which was further modified/corrected vide order dated 08.09.2010. It is contended that in compliance of the order initially, money was deposited with the court but it is not refunded to the complainant petitioner, whereas it ought to have been and such refund was refused mainly on the objection of opposite party, the accused. Since, in the light of order passed by this court, money has been deposited, question of cancellation of the privilege does not arise. So far as withdrawal of money by the complainant is concerned, it ought to have been done subject to result of the case. The precaution could have been taken by obtaining undertaking on affidavit etc. With the above observations, this application stands disposed of. Rajeev/ ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)