%"• In the Honble High Court of Chhattishsarh at BilasRUr (C.Gi) W.P. (S) No. -7^ // 2006 Petitioner Smt. Saroj Kaparde, Aged 46 years '^^W/o Shri Rameshwar Kaparde Assistant Teacher, Govt. Navin Primary School, Dabrapara, Bhilai-3, Block-Patan, Distt. Durg ( C.G.) VERSUS Respondent... ^s^ •\J o fc A.' ^s^ 1. The State Govemment of Chhattisgarh, ^- School Education Ministry, Through the Secretary, Education Department D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) - £USW^ «-12-'6< 2. The Bfock Education Officer, Durg (C.G) Af Writ petition under articles 226/^7" of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ in the nature of MANDAMUS, Certiorari, Prohibition and other suitable WRIT or writs, Order or orders, Direction or directions. ^^ •t. HKH COURT OF CHHATTISAUtH AT BIUISPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HON-BLE MR. &AT3S1 ILj^WlOTKLJ', WMT PETmON fS.l N0. ^60 OF 2006 Petitipner versus ReaBondents Ku. Akdwnonda Dutta Stnte 6ovt. of Chhatttogorh and ano'ther WRIT PETTTION (5.1 N0. 7SW OF 2006 Patrtwner Reapondents versys PoshcBital Sohu The Stoitc wf CWwfisgarh cnd olhers WRTT PETmON (5.1 N0. 7S94 OF 2006 PetMwner wrsa Respwtdents Smt. MBera Twwri "Hw State SovemmuTf' of Chhuttisgorh ondonother WRTT PETmON fS.) N0. 7602 OF 2006 Petitioner verau Respondents TukoRum Sahu Vw State Sowmnicnt of ChhattisgBffh and anolfter WRTT PETITION (S.) N0.7603 OF 2006 Petitioner Respondents vwsus Srnt. Rcykumnri Dhruvu Stute Sovemnwnt of Chhotl'isgurh ond arwther war pErmoN rs.i NO.ZSII OF 2006 Petitioner versus Respondents 5mt. Saroj Koparde The Stdte fitwemmmt of Chharttisgarh ond anoKwr — — WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.7614 OF 2006 Petitioner Respondents versus Smt. Shaclwna Agnnwl The Stnte Sovemment of Chhorttisgarh andonolfwr WMT PFmiON fS.l NQ.TO1S OF 200& Petitioner versus ResBondents JanuRam Thakur The State fiwemment of Chhcrttisgarh andanolher WMT PFTTnON fS.l N0.7616 OF 2QQ6 Petitioner versus Respondents Kishor Singh Tliakw The StntB fiovemmen* of Chhattisgarh WRTT PFTTTION fS.) N0.7618 OF 2006 Petitioner Resoondents versus Smt. 5angeetn Chownhnry The Stnte fiowmnient of Chhattisgnrh ondarwther And WOX PETITION fS.l N0.7620 OF 2006 Petitwner : Smt. Sharia 5harma (Diiiun) versus Respondents : The StoitB fioveniment of Chhuttisgarh ondonofher Present : Atr. Ajoy Shrivostavu, Adwcorte for •thc petitioners. Mr. Sushif Oubey. fiovemment AdvoccrtB for the Slals/respwdents. '^ ORbGR (Pasaed on 10th t)oy of Jonuary, 2007) Leamed couwel oppearng for -the petitioners as well as for the StoAe/re^widents jomtly submit that Ihe focts ond question of taw involved in the present batch of writ petitions ore squarely covered by Ihe deciswn of this Court' in the case of ya^M'ant Kww Bhanuhwj vs. Muntelpat Corpaiwtiwi, Owy anel OWrtM^ . 2. In subsequent coses, iA, Writ Petition (&) No.4130 of 2005 (j6apfsfi Kumw Kwww vs. TTte Staf»6a»t. of CMwttiagarii and flW/Aw^ and o-ther connected matters, decided by Ihis Court on 15- 12-2006, pursuont to -the memo dated 28-1-1995, isaied by the Secretnry, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal <nd •the prospeehis of Diploma m Educotion Exnmmution, it «»asclarified •thot thc nomenclature of the Basic Training Insti'hrte, l.e.. B.TJ. has been changed ond renamed cs Oiploma in Eckication, JA, D.Ed. Accordngly, tiie D.Ed. Certifico-te holders ore also covered by •thc decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (.Gope^ ISumar Verma vs. TJie Siate Govt. ofMwftisgarh andanolha) (Si-yro). 4 ^•) 3. For 1he aforementioned reasons, •the twit petitions ure disposed of in terms of the decision of Ihis Court in •the mattw of Yashwcfit Kunw Bharadwaj (Sipro), subjeet ta wrificatwn of the fact os to whelher Ihe petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.TJ./D.Ed. Cerl'ificates at their owm expenses as per •the circulcB^i duted 24- 12-1998 and 1-3-1999 und further whelher they have been puid Iwo advance increments or not. No order as to costs. A copy of •this order be ptaced on -the record of •the connacted writ petitions. Sd/- SatishKAgnihotri Judge 1 2006CG)MPJR-C696 Bablu