1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5302 OF 1998 Smt. Anusaya D/o Vithalrao Moghekar .... PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & Oths. .... RESPONDENTS Mr. V.D.Gunale, Advocate for petitioner. ............................ CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE: 03/08/2010 ORAL ORDER : 1. The petition is filed by the petitioner contending that though as per the orders of respondent no. 2, the petitioner was absorbed in respondent no. 4 – school, but the petitioner was not allowed to join. 2. By virtue of interim orders, the Court had directed the petitioner to join in respondent no. 4 – school. From the report submitted by respondent no. 2, it appears that the petitioner has been permitted to be join with respondent no. 4. This Court directed the respondents to find as to whether it is the petitioner’s fault or of respondent no. 4. The Dy. Director states that it is the fault on the part of both. 2 3. Since the purpose of the petition has been served by interim order, Rule is made absolute accordingly. However, there shall be no order as to costs. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA ] [ B.R. GAVAI ] JUDGE JUDGE knp/WP 5302.98