IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2031 of 2010 Date of decision : 20.5.2010 Aasdeep Singh etc. ....Petitioners Versus Amar Kaur etc. ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr.V.K.Kaushal, Advocate for Mr. B.R.Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioners. S. D. ANAND, J. Both the Courts, in a view of concurrence, allowed ad- interim restraint plea filed by the plaintiffs-respondents and directed the restraint of petitioners-defendants from alienating the land in suit. In obtaining that view, both the Courts drew sustenance from the fact that the plaintiffs-respondents are successors-in-interest (wife and children) of Joginder Singh deceased who had, along with his mother Basant Kaur and brother Swaran Singh, inherited the estate of their predecessors-in-interest Sohan Singh, father of Basant Kaur and children of Swaran Singh. The plaintiffs-respondents are, thus, owners in possession (in equal share) of the land in suit. The petitioners-defendants resisted the plea aforementioned by relying upon a registered will dated 24.4.1981. The validity of that will is still to be tested at the trial. There is plethora of law on the point that a revisional Court should refrain from interference unless if it is found that the learned Trial Court or the learned Ist Appellate Court had exercised discretion in a perverse or illegal manner, which is not so in the present case. The petition is held to be denuded of merit and is ordered to be dismissed. May 20, 2010 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE