m THE HIOi GOURT OF JQDICATyRE AT BZIASplB <C,G») WRIT PETITIO^ KO. 3'37L op 2003 BS^^SEN 1,: 2. 3. 3', ,3-agaanatfo Tiwari soa of Lafe@ Shri Girdhari Lal •Siwari^ aged about 43 years^ r®sid@ntof 151 Kasaridih^ Durg^ District Durg (CQ)» Megl'matli Saliu SOB of Gejaahar prasad Sahix^aged about 45 years^ resident o£ Lafeabod Tehsil Belod^ Bistrict Darg (CG)^ Rajiv Kui^r Rathore soa of Baba Lal Rathore aged aboat 44 years^ reside^ife of Majaa^dgaon^ District RajiiaadgaoB (CG)^ Vishn<a Son Sarre soii of Shri Rohita aged about 39 years^ resideiit of ^i-llage Sljam M-arra Tehsil Balod,District Durg (CG), All th@ petitio^ers are worfcing ia Class ry post ±m ttse Department of Excise e PETITIONERS N D Th@ State of Chhattisgarh^through the Secretary l^epartmeat of Excise^ MaBtralay^ D^K<»S^Baildlng^ Raipur^ Tehsil axid District Raipur (CG). Ilie Coramissioaer^ Sxcise ^ Raipur (CG)^ •Bfee District Exeis®Gfficer, Durg, District Durg (CG)< Ifae District Excis®officer, 'as&x^ Rajaaadgao^ District.RajsiBBdgaom^ Distrlct Bsctfei"^ officer,' Raipar, Distriefc Raipur (CG), RESPG1SDENTS .^" ^-l^'^-5>WRn? P2TZTION 13FSD22& &RTI!CLES 226/227_OF__mSCQISTZTOTIOS OP INDI& ..r^. XI-HC-22 ^^ <<II^1^1<1, ^Tfl^^Ko, {®|<;11^y sn^r ^ra^ NW<rll «)HI<^ _i^B^.No.<.... 200 l^re^r* ^I^r'SFT 'f^ri^s^T so^i^ ^n -i- ^H^F ^?ITWHft^T 02.04.2003 Shri ^rashant Mishra^ Shri D^R^Agrawal, Dy< Heard. Coixnsel for the parti^ practically covered by two rendered by the M< P^Administrj Original Application No< 100^ Hon8ble the Supreme Court did Counsel for the petitj filed a representation but cc Having considered the case and material on record, ends of justice will be serv^ the petitioner that he may m^ with copy of petition with ai^ before the respondent No» 1 ^ such a representation is fil^ and decided on its own merit as possible preferably withii] the date of representation^ <^i<i{^i<il<i 'W^ff ^ fe^t <R»i^i< '^3^pT3nif?y Advocate for the petitionor. ^dv< General for the State^ js submits that the matter is de|cisions i<Ce the declsion lative Trtbunal^ Jabalpur in 1/1990 and the decislon of jposing of the matter. loner submits that he has jpy of the same is not availabifike< [facts and circumstances of_the |in the opinion of this Court }d if a direction is gxven to (ke a fresh representation along ^nexures and copy of this order ^ithin a month from today^ If jd, the same shall be considered in accordance with law as early ^ a period of four months from [^t^li XI-HC-22 %^^i ^i^ 3^1 5n*iic(» ^i^^t Pafehak '3^1 ^t^Krt^ 'ST^NPTS, ^l«^< 31I^T ^^Fi W.P.No. 397/2003 ^ 200 ^(WW WHI% I^^T' ^^i'^nw^ft^ The petition 1s ac liberty to avail the reme<|ly available in case any adverse order is passed^ Certlfied copy as ^er rules, or*t<tt<?t*ftn NW<?ff *? fe^ iRn^K '^^ri^FT^i^l pordtngly disposed of with / Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge