u^ ^- . ^>- ^j IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^>3^3, WRIT PETITION No^ ""OF 2003 PETITIQNER VERSUS RESPONDENTS Uderam Kashy^? Aged about 41 years S/o Shri Shiv Prasad, R/oVUlageKataud, Police Station: Shivrinarayan, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) StateofChhattisgarh, Tlirough Secretary, Dqsartment ofAgricuIture, D.K.S. Hiawan, Mantralaya, Raipur(C.G.) The Collector, Janjgir, Disti-ict Janjgir Champa (CG) Sub Divisional OfFicer (Revenue), Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.). C.G. State Co-operative Marketing Federation Ltd., Raipur, Dist Raipur ( C.G.). 5. Ofificer In-Chaige of Padcfy Pui'chase Centre, Shlvrinarayan, District JanjgirChampa (C.G). ^:^1. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227'OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA E.^.^^' jif*—-"" T XI-HC-22 3?i^r^Fr i^FiioF3?ii^? WT^ ^^<i ~3^r ^14td4, ^Wt<o, fa<r(i^y 3i?^r ^(^K ^o.f. t-to- 3.S<^, ^ HS^^tl 9§»W<^ •^ 200 •f^^T' iT^T ^i^r^<nw «f^a thfet 11.2.2004 Petitioner by ShriB. D. Gum, ^ Respondents byMiss Shannila ^ The petitioner has preferred of India being aggrieved by the inactio^i payment of the price of paddy to the The CSLSC of the petitioner is 519, 647/2, 505, 521, 328/2, 369, 327, | Village-KAtaud, Patwari Halka No. 6^ Janjgir Champa. The petirioner grown] 2002. The State Govemment declaret dedded to purchsise the paddy of farm^ esublished purchase centers m each cj Sodeties..0n 15.1.2003 the petitionerj Center for which QL receipt Aanexu^e afpproaching for payment of paddy but Leamed counsel for the petiti| make a representation to the Responde^it decide the same axid to make paymej objection. Having heard leamed counsel drcumstances of the case the petition€|: Respondent No.2 within a period of Ij will decide the rq)resenjtation within a| raised by the petitionef in the repre^ reached to the condusion that the padcj lonelr oi»t<<{<r»<iln'WI^f "^ fe^l <^»^i< ^ <^Pd^ w^?r lidvocate. |in^iai, Deputy Govt, Advocate. tli|s petition under Article 226/227 of tfae Constitution on the part of the respondents who are not making pe|tirioner which wa.s sold by the petitioner. he is owner of the lands bearing Khasra No.s 499, (560, 574, 576, 692, 1199, 1353/1 and 573 situated at I, RJ. Clrde - Nawagarh, Tdisil- Janjgir, District- paddy in his agricultural field in the Khariff season |1 procurement policy for the year 2002-2003 and |rs through State Marketing Federation, which in tum |f the village or cluster of villages throu^i Primary sold 219 b^s of paddy in Shivrinarayan Purchase P/2 was issued. Since then the petitloner is (he respondents are not makmg any paynient. (>ner submits that fhe petirioner may be allowed to No.2 axid the Respondent No.2 maybe directed to (it, to which leamed counsel for the State has no leftt |fbr the parties and h^ving regard to the facts and is allowed to make a detailed representation to the p days from today and in tum the Respondent No.2 further period of 30 days considering all the points entation, and if on enquity the Respondent No.2 ly in question has been sold by the petitioner and the ^^- T XI-HC-22^ ^I^T^T R^Ns-3^^TI StirHi^ <-iE^l' '^5^^WM4, ^<+<i<o, fa^w^ 3i^r 'qsr^ ^^ W^FTO^"^^^-""""^ ^-^ @ Rl^i^' 3^^f^^p^ <H&a; pscyment thereof has not yet been ma.4< orders for maldng payment to the petiti<| With the above observatiions thi| ConsequendyM(W)P No. 3227 J Parties are entided for certified <( ohl^fot^i'Hm^^Vs^<R^K ^^^TSR^r' e to the petitioner then he should pass appropriate mer. ;petition is disposed offinally. |f2003 aiid I.A.No. 10226/2003 stands disposed of. ppy of this order. —- ~ Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge