IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3427 of 2008 LALA AWADHESH KUMAR SINHA SON OF LATE KAMESHWAR PRASAD SINHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MADAN BIGHA, P.S. CHANDAUTI, DISTRICT- GAYA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR OF G.P.F. PANT BHAWAN, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, GAYA 4. THE CIVIL SURGEON-CUM-CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, GAYA 5. THE INCHARGE MEDICAL OFFICER, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, JETHIAN (ATRI) DISTRICT GAYA 6. THE TREASURY OFFICER, GAYA 7. ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. A.C. to G.A. IV For the Accountant General : Mr. Arun Kumar Arun, Advocate 2 29.10.2010 As prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the nomenclature of the respondent no.3. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State and the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is that this petitioner along with his brother namely, Jitendra Prasad being the sons of the sister of the deceased employee was nominated by the deceased employee to receive the retiral dues. The nominations were mentioned in the service book and other records. It is submitted that the aforesaid facts are not in dispute even then this petitioner and his brother, who were nominated to receive the retiral dues in the proportion of sixty per cent and forty per cent respectively, are not being paid the same. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State submits that the petitioner as well as his brother needs to satisfy the authority that they are the persons who were - 2 - nominated to receive the retiral dues. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a joint representation before the respondent no.4 along with his brother with copy of the same to the respondent nos. 3, 5, 6 & 7. In view of the above, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled without delay to enable the petitioner to receive the admissible retiral dues along with interest permissible under the rules. However, upon consideration if any of the claim or part of the claims are not being paid the same shall be informed to the petitioner with reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)