1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1736 OF 2010 Mukund Vasant Harhare Petitioner versus Krushikant Mahadeo Mahajan Respondent P.G.Sarda for petitioner. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 11th March 2010 PC : 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is the defendant. The suit has been filed by the respondent for recovery of price of the Tractor with Trolley allegedly sold by the respondent to the petitioner. By the impugned order, on application made by the respondent, he has been permitted to add two parties as defendants in whose name the Tractor and the Trolley appears to have been transferred. Consequential amendment has been permitted to be carried out to paragraph 4 of the plaint. The respondent being dominus litis has a right to implead the parties. The petitioner defendant cannot raise an objection to addition of parties. In the circumstances, no fault can be found with the discretionary order of the Trial Court. The petition is rejected. If additional written statement is not yet filed by the petitioner, the same shall be filed within four weeks from today. (A.S.OKA, J.)