Crl.M.No.M-30254 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-30254 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 16, 2010 Satnam Singh .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.K.D.Sachdeva, Addl.A.G., Punjab. Mr.Gagneshwar Singh, Advocate for the complainant. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.207, dated 30.12.2007, registered under Sections 307, 452, 427, 34 IPC, at Police Station Ghuman, District Gurdaspur, Punjab, in which the petitioner has been summoned to face trial under Section 319 Cr.P.C. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully. This Court while issuing notice of motion on 14.10.2010, passed the following order: “Crl.M.No.54135 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-30254 of 2010 Contends that petitioner was found innocent by the police and however, he has been summoned by learned trial Court to face trial by allowing application of prosecution filed under Section 319 Cr.P.C. vide order dated 30.9.2010, Annexure P9. Further contends that he is ready to appear before learned trial Court and face trial. Crl.M.No.M-30254 of 2010 (O&M) -2- Notice of motion for 16.11.2010. In the meantime, petitioner is directed to appear before learned trial Court on the date fixed and in case he so appears and applies for regular bail, he be admitted to interim bail by learned trial Court subject to any conditions that may deem to be imposed by it.” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that pursuant to the said order, the petitioner has already appeared before learned trial Court and has been admitted to interim bail vide order dated 18.10.2010. These facts have not been disputed by learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for the complainant. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. In view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, order dated 14.10.2010, granting interim bail to petitioner-Satnam Singh, is, hereby made absolute subject to any conditions that may deem to be imposed by learned trial Court. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. 16.11.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge