IN THE fflGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATBILASPUR W-P^S) N0. ^U^OF2007 <^Pl't4 PETITIONER : ^ ^^ ~^^:- --^Q~Lr^^s" Smt. Sarita Pathak, wife of late Dwarika Prasad,aged about 39 years, resident of Purani Basti, Saraswati Chowk, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) ,,A,,^'°^^;i ^ 1^' RESPONDENTS ^^z^20 / VERSUS (1) State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary General Administration Department , Raipur District- Raipur, (C -G.). (2) The Sanchalak ,Nagar tatha Gram Nivesh SanchnalayyElaipur, District-Raipur (C.G.) ^7,/'(3) The Chief Executive Officer, Raipur Vikas Pradhtkaran, Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226/0F THE CONSmTUTION OF INDIA BlC—78 an^B w R-fi* 'crar SH^T ^phT f* •V ) vfwvn tt>*(ic<i 3^ •<ii<iid<i, ®Til<H'i<o,fs|<rtwy ^...u..e..Ls.).^.iE/.^.....•RF^ZOO sn^r Tra?r (lil'l'i^) ^'(<(lttR «I?d<w^<i SB: Hon. Mr. Justice Pi 19.08.2009: Shri Awadh Tripathi couns Shri Yaswant Singh Thaki arjd 2. Shri B.P. Sharma counsel perspi|is In the present petition the appointment as her husband 24.12.2005. Contention of the petition^ of the petitioner has seryed th^ more than 23 years, the compassionate appointment. Hi^ of slmiiarly situated compassionate appointment. On the other hand couns^l efforts for giving compassionate and a letter in this regard has al( He submits that as soon as ttl would be considered forthe sam| State counsel submits tha( statement as to whether the po|i have been sanctioned or not. l-1( substantive right to get the compt cbl^<r)'4i*1 'WRTt* ^f Is^ <r»l+$l-(. ^sifimaii^r itinker Diwaker il for the petitioner. r Dy. AG for the respondents No. 1 for respondent No.3. petitioner is seeking compassionate Dwarika Prasad Pathak died on 'r's counsel is that though husband Raipur Development Authority for petitioner has not been given further contention is that a number have already been given for respondent No.3 submits that appointment to the petitioner are on so been written to the Government. e posts are sanctioned, petitioner he is not in a position to make any sts sought for by respondent No.3 3 submits that the petitioner has no assionate appointment. k ,^< i: iteS®S)a S 'tS 3 J S '•v^~':y~1acfE—!& ''^^s.^y ss^yw K-ft* Wt 311^1 ^W •A. /?:^ <S'T" 2 - ^iHtTT a»*ii<*> 'TST -tii'4i<n'4, ®T|I<H'IS,[«<?lfy^<. ^....ki.LC^..±U.S:.Ul. ibHieh ~ " ' 31^1'q^F (1<<f^«l<^I) TOIIW(ffi?[3^I At this stage, counsei for 1 permitted to withdraw this petil pending with respondent No. 3 assures that case of the accordance with law as soon State Government. Accordingly, the petition ii as aforesaid. The representatio by the authority concemed in ac Expression of any opinic avoided keeping the authorities deciding the representation of th ^he petitioner submits that he may be |ion with liberty to pursue her case 1|. Counsel for respondent No.3 also pjetitioner would be considered in ^s the posts are sanctioned by the i$ t^l<4l<rf4l*1 TTr^<;lf ^f fs^l 'tRt^.K ^siRiHan^i dismissed as withdrawn with liberty n so filed is expected to be decided tsordance with law. n on merits of the case has been free to apply their own mind while ^. petitioner. _ _ _ _ __ -- -— — Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge