%N?%N^^^^^^^ INTH:&;HIGH"G!C^r 3E?®l2CK^Aa^ISCrARH:^^ Writ^Petifct6^Nlt^:S-^^^;20:05' PETITIONER RESPOWDEaT'TS ^ ^'??~°^5<^ ^.^^s "''"'.'--^^---iS?' f^.Jli- ^" .'HQ»:'SI<E,D^B£-1':':^.';..;..'\.'..:-^ 'FCrEi^TStT'!EKB8SX.nvSX&A'tl€W ^•''.'•Sainaru'.Ram.^'Kurre,'' , ': Aged.about:'32/.years;;^.:>::,';7 :^ '. :'S/'o^:.'Sli^',A,a^a^-^r&:[Kurre^:,',' .%at^£^s!Qia-Smi^:^an®la^ajtr;:K^ IBSJSiSBfflSSiii.lislSR^Mi:^^M' ?:SI' sffi'Fj:tida:®jtSti-iet^ (iia|||ffl^(£^%^^g:^:^^:^,-^^.:::,^.^ "»"-"• ' •V.-' '' •'••"' '." '.;::.-.^ •VERSITS •- : .';'1:' ::.'' 1; State of chhattisgaFli '.'Tlirough Tlie'.seei^l^iy'^ Pancliayat 8& welfyre Departlment D.K.S. Building District Raipnr (e. G.) .2 :^SC61le:GtOr-:.',1: •.•''- '•r:;-':;::.:,^ ^^•¥:^:.;Raip^';{C:.a.:)^: ^:^1:,;!;,^.,.,^ .,'; 3. ; S^b-Divisiona^ C)pi^r|;(!&raru^ OiHee at N®afSeeretariat ,; B'uilding^,Kmownj.a^,.Puraru.,^ ,:..;,. ^Iisi]i;ii?ai^ur^(€^G);..;,|.j,:.^ S^;'^.^%l:K'^:'.l:i:¥^A.^^ 'A-.:''Aa^e'l:'CSaief"^e:cutiv^:',;@f'fice:r-;:':^;:. y^.^.^s. c^' :'Eilda^^©istriKglsj;I%a^ptMi^(©.©i.) ;:^t; .^ .sia :iaas 8i?iSSSS8S!S / •^ // 2 // 5. Shri TejrarnVarnia Aged about 36 years S/0 Not Known Sarpaneh Gram. PanGfaayat Kohka, R/o Village Ghulghul, P.0. Nevra, Tahsil Tilda District Raipur (C.G.) 6. Shri Mahesh S/o Punnuram. Dhiwar, Qccupation Mystry, aged about 40 years, R/o Resideiit't^'yillage'K.otika, P.Q. NeYFa:,i;Tal:isU Tilda District :Raipiir.^.(C..&;^^,. • .'. ,,:: 7. Sliri (SKouba Ram Nishad S/o Brylal, aged abot 28 years Labour (Iron Rod Cutter), Resident of vmage Kohka.P.O. Nevra, Tahsil Tilda District Raipur (C.G,) WRIT PETITIONU/A 227 OF THE CONSTlTUTIQNO^INiaiA 1. PARTICULARS OF THEPE'nTIONER As stated above In tb.e ca'u:se titte; 2. PARTICULA.RS OFTHE RESPONDEN-T As stated above in the cause title. 3.1 PAI^ICVZ.AJiS C)^^^^ V :^'i^'.-::,..l:::f .. :'. IMPUCrNED AGAJNST WHIGH PE'riTION I& MADE.. , : . :- ' : •• . : 1 : ; : : i: : .•.:,,,;, ..K^^SS ''BMISIM WM9SS :18tl!IJUil ^;I-HC:-22 X:-HC-22 1. ^ -3Sf'?(FiRT?,ES'a1'y*i'»,Ri!atfl>i<. <?I^I'iCT f5:na?'3n§?T !fi'i:IWHft?[ .,,J W.P ^TO- 9.^, ww»r;grwch •-^ 2W^' l^s^s: *l<4fs't''il-f.*41ttifl'? 1St^<&l<$K ^; srpOT afl^T, DIVISION BENCH Hoii'lilie SUniJustice V.KI Sltriffastava& Hon.'Ble SIui Justice DhikfindTa Mishra, JJ. 27.3.20Q& Smt, Savita Tjwari Shri VWS.-Murty 3.,2&3. Sl^ Paal^ Shriv^sta^ «)uii^fcrrespQndeutS^No.4 & 5. 'Phe.ins.tant Publk: Rs.3,QO,000/- (Riipees However, the quality of counsel for ^he peti.tioner, ^ Dy. A.G. &r tfaie Sfate/respoiuleuts Np. Inferest Litigatioa petitiori. h^ beeu filjed by the petitKmer, t averi|i:^ ^ ewin-th^ Panchayatt Kolika coiistructed two iMuldin^ undeT the^Iategrated Cluia^^^D Scheme (fcrf short IGD^) anil fta' the aboyc puri»se, a suta Gf Threc Lakhs) liaye ,been sauctiQnea. teconstTuctfonofttteabovebuildingsw^ substaiida»a taad speeiflicatiQns ;were aot ailUered to. ~ Eyen fte^ necessaiy rtinforcement]to be provjded ia fflic eonstructioaVss uot been provided and i^in]|)0nt Goii^tion'l:]^ Ueen praeticed^ Ttie piayerhasla^eninadefo^^directionte enquiry into thje matter ^b as(«rtaiEttte qualtly of fhie eonstruQfion and submitjiis repoSt, w-Ser dated 20,6.2005, airecfed the This Court vMe CoUector, Raipur, respc submit the report wlfh sEtdeut "No. 2' to cause aa eDiquiiy and an: affldawit stating tiicrem 'whetlier tte •['(Tt%';'^f^ XI-HC-22 SD^iqCT W an^r sn^i^ <i%a wsl ~5^1 -W»vW,w9w ,^vlwy, •U;'P- M>. • • 'q^g? *111<fll Sbliqi •^f^ 200^ fci'bt^sr' afoNsaid eonstruction UDfler fhe I.G;D,| confonnil^ wifh the technlcal taken upon 6.3,2006, Hoi^ directed was filcd nor any respondent No.2, In fhe that fhe Distrief CoUcctor; com.pliance of the above ordcrj is present ia persoa aiid it is| No. 2 that a detafled aflBdavit fhe oider dated 20.6.2005 So fer as delay iu submjttiiig aGBdavit ttet mmiediatefy' aflej CoUector appointed Sub Divisi(|] jen.quuy ofBcer vide order reminder was again sent t6| However, the delay in filing F'roiu perusal of the alongwifhaEBd.avitasAnaexujt] Shri K.K. Bakshi has submittfcd both fhese constructions are for the public purposes, Alonj report has also been ^ submitt^d Public Works Department, ^l;4M<fr;:T-44l4<?ll''^ f^^l ^^K i? 3Tl^n.3ii^f ,P. referrad to aa ths petitioa are in s|pecifteations. The.matterwas agani "i^reyer, by that date, no report as ^xtension of time :'was sought by cireuiBstaiiGes, it was dir«;ted Ipai.pur shaB. appear< ia persoa in . Shit S.K. Singh, CoHiectoi^ Raipur submitted on 'bctialf of respondcnt tfresppnxteti.t No. 2 in'eompliance of with doctunents have been filed. ^lus report, it Kas beeh stated: in tfae itae orders df (tlis Court, fhe ftiea |iaal QfiBccr, Raipur Sbri K.K. Bakshi djatcd 11.7.2005 andfhereafteT,a him vide memo datcd 31.7.2005. Iias been regrctted, ;Teport wfaich Iias been flled |a R/2-4, we find that cnqujry officer his report and faas' certffied fhat safe aad the g.aoic can be used ^ with fhls repoi-t, techiu.cal enquiry by fhe ExcGutiMe EBgiDffer of "fhe |Bridge GorpoiaMbn Division ' aud • rep|ort eif.quuy N^ ;^t^!ctRsi4; XI-HC-22 "ysr 'sipJRra, dTil'Li'li4, ftMi-My. 'kSiP-l^cr *<1*<WI ft»11'»i •M 200,5" 'fa^N' sn^i^i R-li'* .311^1 a'i^i'^ ^if?Ti J' KYR accordaig to fhis reportalso, per specffications. Even fhe 1 biulduig havc been filedwith thc| In the l^ht 6f fhe affidavitj of the Gonsidered opmion fhat in tfae instaat petitionand the Accorditigly, the Public ^isposed b£,- "< coAstruGtiori has been undertalEcn as Iphotographs of thc coristructed laffidavtt. . iBled toy- respoiidcntNo. 2,we are n^ furfher prqceeduigs are required sa]me maytoe disposedof - Interest Lit^gatfoa petition is Sd//- V.K.Shrivastava Judge +|i|Ifl'ii)-1 *1|l'l<'ff 4 ' %t tfai'SK ^; siPgtT'sii^a Sd/- Dhu'endraMishra - Judge [T:t^^f<a^'