1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8495 OF 2009 R.V.Construction & Ors. ... Petitioners Vs. Nashik Municipal Corporation & Anr. Respondents Mr.R.S.Khadapkar with Mr. S.D.Shinde, Advocates, for the petitioners. Mr. M.L.Patil, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 26th November, 2009. P.C. 1. Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. Earlier, the petitioners had an approved plan dated 6.6.2007. Subsequent thereto, the petitioners purchased adjoining land and submitted a revised plan. Approval for the revised plan was granted on 16.12.2008. Construction was put up thereafter. It appears that a complaint was filed with the respondents based upon which they have issued a show cause notice. The petitioner is aggrieved by the same. 2 3. At the hearing, we asked the learned Counsel for respondent No.1 as to whether any part of the building was in contravention of the D.C. Rules, Regulations, Act or bye-laws and/or contrary to the plan as sanctioned. The learned Counsel fairly concedes that there is no such contravention. In the light of that, the following order :- Petition is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b). (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)