HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE No.514 of 2011 in WRIT PETITION No.12943 of 2010 Date: June 30, 2011 Between: M/s. Balaji Club, Rep. by its Prop. P. Ram Reddy. … Petitioner And 1. A.K. Khan, Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad & 4 others. … Respondents * * * HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE No.514 of 2011 in WRIT PETITION No.12943 of 2010 O R D E R: This contempt case was filed alleging disobedience to the order dated 19.7.2010 passed by this Court in W.P. No.12943 of 2010. By the said order, the writ petition was disposed of in terms of the Division Bench judgment in W.A. No.1167 of 2002. The effect thereof being that the police authorities were held disentitled to obstruct the petitioner club from conducting its lawful activities, including a card room where members and guests were allowed to pay the game of rummy with stakes/syndicate (thirteen card game). This Court, however, left it open to the police authorities to enter the club premises for the purpose of verification as to whether the petitioner club and its members were indulging in any other activities including playing of card games other than rummy with stakes/syndicate (thirteen card game). 2. It is now stated by Sri G.L. Narasimha Rao, learned counsel representing Sri L. Venkateswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner club, that the club also initiated civil proceedings in the matter and obtained a temporary injunction under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It is further stated that the petitioner club is desirous of taking steps under Order XXXIX Rule 2-A of the Code of Civil Procedure in respect of the violation of the temporary injunction orders granted by the civil Court. 3. As the petitioner club seems to have initiated parallel proceedings simultaneously and obtained orders not only from this Court but also from the competent civil Court, this Court is not inclined to entertain this contempt case, as the petitioner club itself seeks to pursue its remedies before the civil Court. 4. The contempt case is accordingly dismissed without going into merits. No order as to costs. ___________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J Date: June 30, 2011. BSB