IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 19TH MARCH 2009 / 28TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 8947 of 2009(K) --------------------------------- PETITIONER : --------------------- V.S.RAJASEKHARAN, EKARNAPARAMBATH, THIRUTHIYAD, PATHIYARA P.O., KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENTS : ------------------------ 1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, VATAKARA. 2. ABDUL RASHEED, S/O.ALAVI, NEELANGATH HOUSE, EDARIKODE P.O., MALAPPURAM-676 501. BY SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 8947 of 2009 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 19th day of March, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioner submits that timings in respect of his stage carriage were settled by Exhibit P2 proceedings of the first respondent. According to the petitioner, the second respondent has filed Exhibit P3 objection and sought for reopening of Exhibit P2. Coming to know of this, by Exhibit P4, the petitioner raised objections regarding the maintainability of Exhibit P3. His present apprehension is that the respondents may proceed with Exhibit P3 and pass orders thereon ignoring Exhibit P4. Having regard to the above grievance, this writ petition is disposed of directing that as and when Exhibit P3 is taken for consideration, the respondent shall consider Exhibit P3 in the light of the objections raised by the petitioner in Exhibit P4 including that of the maintainability of Exhibit P3. Orders shall be passed in the above manner with notice to the petitioner also. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE scm