1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1088 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra & Oths. ..... PETITIONERS VERSUS Sudam Kerba Ukande .... RESPONDENT Mr. K.S.Bhore, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. K.J.Ghute Patil, Assistant Govt. Pleader for State. ........................... CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & S.V.GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE : 29/03/2010 PER COURT : 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, by which the petitioners challenge the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Aurangabad Bench dated 8/1/2010 in Original Application No. 627 of 2008 directing the respondents to give 5 % grace marks to the petitioner. The aforesaid directions have been issued on the basis of the Govt. Resolution, which directs the giving of such 5 % grace marks . The contention of the learned Assistant Govt. Pleader is that the aforesaid resolution would not apply to technical posts. The aforesaid distinction between non technical post and technical post has not been carved out by the resolution. More over, the respondents themselves have issued certificate to the petitioner dated 30/12/2003 holding the respondent entitled to be awarded these grace marks. 2. Upon considering the rival submissions of the parties and perusing the Order passed in Original Application No. 627 of 2008, according to us, we do not notice any perversity in the reasoning of the Tribunal to warrant any interference in this petition. Consequently, this 2 Writ Petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. [ S.V.GANGAPURWALA ] [ P.V.HARDAS ] JUDGE JUDGE knp/WP 1088.10