IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY THE NINETEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR : PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE: E. DHARMA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.118 of 2004 (Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to rev ise the order of the Court of the Principal Junior Civil judge Court, at Karimnagar, made in I.A.No.2454 of 2003 in O.S.No.62 of 2000, dated 14-11-2003) Between: Chada Narayana Reddy Petitioner AND 1. Sunka Lachamma, W/o. Mallaiah 2. Sunku Prabhakar, S/o. Mallaiah 3. Rajamani, W/o. Bhagwandas (All are R/o. H.No.3-7-408, Vavilapalli, Karimnagar) Respondents The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.Chetluru Srinivas, Advocate for the Petitioner The Court made the following ORDER: “This Civil Revision petition filed by the petitioner therein, aggrieved by the dismissal order dated 14-11-2003 passed in I.A.No.2454 of 2004 in O.S.No.62 of 2000 under Section –151 of C.P.C. on the file of the principal Junior Civil judge, Karimnagar, for grant of police aid. In pursuance of the decree passed in O.S.No.62 of 2000 when he tried to fix cement poles and barbed wire in order to protect the open land and the respondents/defendants, interfering with the suit land in an extent of 0-05 guntas in Sy.No.1317/A at Vavilapalli, which was opposed by the respondents by way of filing counter stating that there is no direction in the decree to dismantle any compound wall constructed by defendants in the suit land. Now the petitioner/plaintiff is trying to dismantle the wall, in order to serve the purpose only he filed the present petition. There is no mandatory direction under the decree to remove the wall. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not dismantling the compound wall, but he is fixing the cement poles with barbed wire to protect the open land, for that the respondents/defendants should not have raise any objection. In view of the above, there shall be interim direction to give police protection only to fix the cement poles with barbed wire in order to protect the open land and it is further directed the petitioner not to dismantle the compound wall constructed by the respondents/defendants in the suit land. Post the matter after summer vacation, 2004.” ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1. The Principal Junior Civil judge Court, at Karimnagar, Karimnagar District. 2. Sunka Lachamma, W/o. Mallaiah 3. Sunku Prabhakar, S/o. Mallaiah 4. Rajamani, W/o. Bhagwandas (All are R/o. H.No.3-7-408, Vavilapalli, Karimnagar) 5. Chada Narayana Reddy, S/o. Laxma Reddy, R/o. H.No.2-10-920, Jyothinagar, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District. 6. One Spare Copy. 7. Drafted by: KK Drafted on; 27-4-2004 HIGH COURT EDRJ DT. 19-4-2004 NOTE: POST THE MATTER AFTER SUMMER VAATION 2004 ORDER C.R.P.NO. 118 OF 2004 INTERIM DIRECTION