'lrm».^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Civil Revision No. ^22-V 2005 Sfllg^g Beneh' Aoolicants. (Claimants) ;•• Smt. Sumati Bai Wd/o Manoharlal Verma Ased about 38 years Bhoj Ram S/o Manoharlal Venma, Aged about 23 years Both R/o Kannada, P.S & Tehsil - Baloda Bazar, Dist: Raipur-(C.G.) Versus Resoondents (Defendants) 1. 2. Bhoj Ram S/o Radheshyam Verma, Aged about 25 years R/o Jtiarwe, P.8.- Palari, Present Address Mova Raipur, Dist: Raipur-(C.G.) —VehicleDriver— Wasim Raja S/o Abbas Khan @ Riyazuddin Khan (Muslim) Aged about 20 years, R/o Modahapara, Bombay market Raipur, Dist: Raipur-(C.G.) —VehicleOwner The new India Insurance Co.Ltd., Through - Divsional Manager, New India Insurance Co.Ltd., Madina Buildmg Kacheri Chowk, Raipur-(C.G.) CIVIL REVISION U/S 115 OF THE CODE OF CrVIL PROCEDURE 3. .1^. XI-HC-78 *ll*lrtl ^HT^? \JT;TJ -y ly lri<j, u-tTI'{-t<i<», Rrt it-iy .9.:^.^^.. 3ir^9Ttwp ('i'ilgi-s) ^200 gii^CTiiiTft'ito gaiTaiI^STSPWff Shri N.K.Agraw-al, Dy. The appiicant has prefsr 20.06.2005 pass.sd by learned Sei] Tribunai in Execution Case No. p.rsferred by She claimant for pe] i0,000.f- for the purpose of constri| imn?;A' ^t nn^ninn s 'n&v^ hfi^rrs?*^^ \J'at»s'] ^'<i^~^ 'TL^ -l ^^^^tiri j il:i n 'iw^-. fri S iSff^"^ TT^^ •^?1i { 'WTf?-wf Learned counsel for the api below passed an a'Aard in Claim 3,97,596,'- in favour ofthe claimarii a sum of Rs/1,00,000.'- has been Sumatl Bai and Bhojram and furtt deposit account of minor, Ganga application to withdraw the Sumati Bai for. a sum of Rs. 50,OS account of Bhojram. However tl impugned order ofths:C.ourt beion a'ready disbursed 1,30,000/- from not be justlfied to'. pay the above counse! for the appiicant further documents and an affidavit to esta; been reiected. <i'i^i(d41'i <ii*iriT*t"fal<9 tRifsix ^3lKl*f3II^?T IpliUi G. for respondent ^ No.3/insurance this revision against the order dated ;ond Additional MoSor'Accident Claims i2/2004'.and by which the appiication mlssion to withdra!w the sum of Rs. ction ;ofhoijse and Rs. 75,000;'- for the cants submits that the learned Court Gase 'No. 32/2004 for-a sum of Rs. |s and out ofthe Sotal avfarded amount ^eposiSed in the fixed deposit account of [er sum of Rs. 1 ,30.000/- in the fixed Prasad. The c'aimants preferred the from the fixed deposit account of 0()/- and 75,000/- from the fix6d deposit |e ss.me has^been rejected by ths on ths ground that the'olaimants havs al.varded sum and therefore it would jum Just within three mont'ns. Learned |submits that the applicant had filed Jlilish the same. Hov>'ever ths same has S-- l.v XI-HC-78 *11*101 ^Wqi vjT;T|"yiyiri^,u-t'n'<-t*i<»,Rirti'iiyt C..'?..}^3j05'' an^sTq^p (ylgq.s) ^200 3II%CTWR'fi* gaiian^Tanito' ?TaTW?^itei aiii<T - 2.- rl.rtU?T^o!l lave neard Taking into considsration the| of justice wil! bs served if th^ Rs. 50.000/- each from their fixecj obssr/ation the revision is disposedl <bl«Irt41'f*11*lc»T*t"ls'<9'<Rif5;i'( ^ari^iaii^a facts and circurnstancss of the case, •V y^iUUt, deposit accoynt. With the aforesaid of. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge