{1} DB CW(Parole) No. 10010/2010 Akhay Singh Vs State & Ors. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR O R D E R D.B. Civil Writ Petition (Parole) No. 10010/2010 Akhay Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others. DATE OF ORDER: 28.07.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENA V. GOMBER Mr. Lakhan Singh Tomar, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajendra Yadav, Govt. Advocate for the respondents. **** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Admit. Issue notice to the respondents. Mr. Rajendra Yadav, Government Advocate, who is present in the court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Convict-petitioner has preferred this writ petition challenging the impugned order dated 15.07.2010 passed by District Magistrate, Bharatpur in pursuance of meeting dated 06.07.2010 of District Parole Advisory Committee, whereby the application of petitioner for grant of second parole of 30 days has not been decided and the same has been kept pending. {2} DB CW(Parole) No. 10010/2010 Akhay Singh Vs State & Ors. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner was eligible for grant of second parole of 30 days. District Superintendent of Police, Bharatpur gave an adverse report, whereas the District Probation Officer recommended the case of the petitioner for grant of parole. In view of two contradictory reports, the District Parole Advisory Committee did not think it fit and proper to decide the case of the petitioner and kept it pending, whereas it was the duty of the District Parole Advisory Committee to decide the application in either way. Learned Government Advocate fairly and frankly admitted that he will advise the District Parole Advisory Committee to consider and decide the application of the petitioner as early as possible. After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, the parole writ petition filed by the petitioner is allowed. Impugned order dated 15.07.2010 qua the petitioner is set aside and District Parole Advisory Committee is directed to consider and decide the application of the petitioner for grant of second parole of 30 days in the next meeting or within 3 months whichever is earlier, positively. {3} DB CW(Parole) No. 10010/2010 Akhay Singh Vs State & Ors. Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to District Magistrate, Bharatpur for compliance. (MEENA V. GOMBER),J. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. Manoj Item No.5.