^ ^ :!:-(1 /'M C F-(-^^_ IN THE HIGH_CQURT OF JUDICATURE BILASPUR W.P. No.^fe') /2006 PETITIONER r Smt. Snageeta Dhiri, W/o Shri Daya Shankar Dhiri, Aged about 42 years, R/o Bazaar Para, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS /••y? ^*^-"' ^€%' -5^>'" ^^^" •^>\<A'" ,.•' ^^- .-!» •:p' / u' -~ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary Schedule Caste 65 Schedule Tribe Welfare Departanent, D K S Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.). ^ 2. The Commissioner, Schedule Caste SB Schedule Tribe Welfare Departinent, Raipur (C.G.). 'T'- y 3. BIock Education Officer, Kota, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) .^€f^.<^ -^yJL^' y y ^- 4. Smt. Panch Kumari Bhaskar, Superintendent Pre Metric Gu-ls Hostel Pandariya, Distt. Kawardha (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 8s 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA . Yt/ XI-HC-78 *<1*1MI sh*11<h 3^T "!<l'i)ICI'M, OTfl'M'IS, isldK-fy Gt3.T,.<?-: •^< V^ 20&^ STT^TIRW (I^3^8T) sn^rqiTfqqN; (t8(T 3TI^?T sh1 ?TaTW(lfeT3T^?T «hi<itfi<fl'iiiii-iTfftec^<Ri+di< ^3ri^lT3I1^7T 14-8-; Shri Vinod Deshmukh, coun^el forthe petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy G^vt. Advocate for the State/respondente No.1 to 3, on advance copy. Heard. By the instant petition, the ||>etitioner, who is an Assistant Teacher and working as Superintendent, G^vernment Pre Metric Scheduied Caste Girls Hostel, Kota, Bilaspur, has qi^estioned the order dated 7 July 2006, Annexure-P/1, whereby she has Kawardha. The main grievance of the p| is district level, seniority is being m 'een transferred to Pandariya, District fetitioner is that the post of the petitioner lintained at the district level, even then she has been transferred out of the tlistrict. In the circumstances, coun^ei for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner may be allowed to mak^a representation to respondent No.1 and he be directed to decide th^ all her grievances within a perio^ respondent No.1 shall decide the < period of 30 days from the date considering all the points raised by\ representation, to which counsel for respondents has no objection. Havingheard learned coun^el for the parties, having regard to the facte and cireumstances of the ca^e and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the petitioner is allowed to make a detailed representation along with a copy of]this petition to respondent No.1 raising of 10 days from today and in turn, epresentation of the petitioner within a of receipt of the representation, after he petitioner, in accordance with law. P.T.O. i* XI-HC-78 3^T "i<l<<ld<<, tfiTflu'IS, I'K'IKiy *11*1WI Sh*11<*» ?^ 200 341^1 4^«<i (licltds"<.!ST) 3l1^T^f?:lN; craTSII^Tshlit) ^' Barve STdRK dferan^r -^. tii'Mfa'fl-i Hi*iMTtFtecit<Ri«i< ^siRmsn^T in the meanwhile, the effect respect of the petitioner shall rem^i petitioner is decided. With the direction aforesaid, Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.^5 Parties are entitled for certifi^d |the petition stands disposed of. ^325/2006 a!so stands disposed of. copyofthisorder. Sd/- and operation of the impugned order in ijn stayed, till the representation ofthe Judge P.T.O. 'A, s"