1 sa101.99 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 101 OF 1999 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1301 OF 1999 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6147 OF 1999 (Abedabee w/o. Sk. Ahamad & Anr. Vs. Syed Rasool s/o. Syed Jamal & Ors.) Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATED : 16.08.2011 Mr. S.A. Dhengle, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. A.N. Nagargoje, Advocate for the respondents. 1. This appeal is filed against the concurrent findings of the Courts below that the appellants/defendants could not prove their theory that the partition of the house property had taken place long back and therefore the respondents/ plaintiffs were not entitled to any share in the house property. The judgments are concurrent. The questions of fact were decided with the help of cogent evidence. The Courts below rejected the case of the appellants by recording cogent reasons. I 2 sa101.99 see no reason to disturb the same. No question of law arises in this appeal. The appeal stands dismissed. 2. In view of disposal of the Second Appeal, connected Civil Applications do not survive and stand disposed of. [A.V. NIRGUDE, J.] snk/2011/AUG11/sa101.99