IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13931 of 2008 MOHAN PRASAD TIKMANI S/O LATE RAM VILAS PRASAD TIKMANI R/O VILLAGE& PS-RUNNISAIDPUR, DISTT- SITAMARHI-------------------PETITIONER Versus 1. SENIOR DIVISIONAL RETAIL SALES MANAGER,IOC LTD. (MARKETING DIVISION, MAURYA LOK COMPLEX, PATNA 2. DIVISIONAL RETAIL MANAGER, IOC. LTD, KRISHNA COMPLEX AKHARAGHAT ROAD, MUZAFFARPUR 3. SALES OFFICER, AREA IOC LTD.MANDAL OFICE AT KRISHNA COMPLEX AKHARAGHAT ROAD, MUZAFFARPUR, 4. SATYANARAIN PRASAD TIKMANI S/O SUKHDEO PRASAD TIKMANI R/O VILLAGE & PS- RUNNISAIDPUR, DISTT- SITAMARHI------- -------------------------------RESPONDENTS ----------- 6 11.1.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Keeping the nature of the dispute between the parties the Court on 26.11.2009 granted indulgence to private parties to dispute to appear before the Senior Official of the I.O.C. so that may be with the intervention of the respondents Corporation the two sides will resolve the dispute and business could continue. Now learned counsel representing the IOC informs the Court that though the two parties did appear before the Senior Official they could never resolve their difference amongst themselves. Since the issue relates to reconstitution of the firm contrary to the record of the earlier constitution and there is no meeting of mind between the parties, therefore no clear direction can be issued upon the respondent Corporation to start dealing with the petitioner or any other till they resolve their dispute or get a proper declaration from the appropriate forum as to who are the rightful partners or person to seek reconstitution. In view of above no interference is required at this stage. - 2 - This present writ application is dismissed with liberty above. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)