JS THE HIQH COH&T OP CHHATPISGAEiH AT BILASPUR, WCit Petitj.on Np. r2-3'ZG /zooi. PSTITIONER iakharaas/o Bishaiabhar, aged about 70 years, Sar@aBCti» Gcam PaBChayat Kuinhari, Tehsil Arang, B.i.stt. Ra.tpar, C.s. V,E $-- S •B S. RESPONDENTS -^ '?'• -• ^^ <3> R^'^.-- ^'..••"' BW"' /•" Tfae State of aahat-fcisgarh, throagh SearetaFy, Pandiayat , Raipur, C.G. 2. Qraa Panchayafc Kambari, through tCs Seeretary, Tehsil Arang, Q.tstt. Ralpur.G.G. 3. Tbe Sub DlYisiQnal Offlcer. Raipur (Brescrlbed aathorl.ty) Ak and f>ost Ralpar^' C3ihattisgarh, BRET: PEEEriON UNBER ARTXGLE 226/227 OF THE eOHSTETOTIOK Oy^SBIA.: ~ ^ : ' ; ! v c sa ; ; XI-HC-22 3II^t»R K-iWi'^iiRi ^•qi'=h W?<T "^,--'\. teo^fti'ty^- ^: ;'3^ •<11<11<1<1, Bfll^'16, fawi+iy / SIT^T Tra^ ff^-^^^^200 *<i*iCTr stiHicn fN^CT' an^iwngt^iOT 10.04.2002 SHri. Surdl Sinha, GC Shri Gautam Bhadi State. Heard. By fhis writ petitloi Constitution of India, no confidence m.otion pi favour of motion out of 12 Shri Bfaaduri, that altemative remedy resolution dated 10/ 1Q/: before the CoUector. In tfals vlew of the fhe appeal is preferred w t,Q)e expedltAostsAy^ •'" :'• merit^iii accordance witl^ TIie^'petftfon is observation aforesaid. C.C. be supplied todjay (=ni<i[<?i41i ^rt^l* ^ fe^ <Pt<^i^ ^SlPgq 311^1 lunsel for fhe petitioner. iri, Ooveminent Advocate, for the t ffled under Article 226/227 of fhe peljitioner challenges the resolution of p^ssed by ni^ority of 10 votes in n4 • ,». • . • Qoveitnm.ent Advocate, however, subuiits of appeal agam.st the impugned ^001 is available to the petitioner Da|atter, itwoiild be appropriat<e that if lithin 71 days from today before the feame shall be considered on its own law. * , , ., di^posed of at this stage with the Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ^pll^ 'I J'^V^:. ^ps^ ptaEg^e^ ^ C&'o»<i|: