I, •)< c^?-^2— IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CG) WRIT PETITION (S) N0. SS3 /2007 PETITIONER .<^ '.u";r^- ^w\ffx \.V •y ^- •^' €>%^ f^-' \. Ao^ ."^~ >'' y ^' RESPQND_ENTS ^" ^-^^.\,^ ?fi;i'L^ ^V(° '"Q^c" ~ ^° ^' 'Smt. Prabha Sharma aged about 43 years, wife of Shri Vijendra Sharma, Assistant Teacher, Government Primary School - Narayee Tikra, Tah. Dharamjaigqrh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretar/, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Distt. Education Officer, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Dharamjaigarh Distt. Raigarh (CG) •"^: WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT MLASPUR W. P.(S) No. %3 of 2007 Petitioner ; Smt. Probha Sharma Versus Respondents State of Chhorl-t-isgarh and others SB: Hon'ble Mr, Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Bablu Present: Mr. A. N. Bhakta, Advocate for the petitioner. AArs. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Sovemment Advooate for the respwdents/State. OR&ER O'assed on this 29th t>oy of January, 2007) 1. Leamed coinisel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts of the present writ petition are similar to that of m W. P. (5) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others vs. Stote Sovemment of Chhattisgarh A o-thers), which was allowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. They further submit that the questton of kiw involved is also -the same. 2. In view of the above-stated submissions made by leamed counselfor the parties, the writ petitwn is allowed in terms of the order dated 7.11.2006 passed by this Court in W.P. (5.) No. 5976/2006 (Sushi'l Tiwari and others vs. State ©ovemmentof Chhatt-iayarh & others). No order as to costs. __— Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge r