SBCWP No.4984/07. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4984/2007. M/s.Sharda Aluminum Products Vs. Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation Ltd. & Ors. Date of order : 11/10/2007. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Sudesh Bansal for the petitioner. ****** BY THE COURT:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2) This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer that respondent-RIICO may be directed to re-consider the cancellation of allotment of Plot No.H-1-781 allotted to the petitioner in Industrial Area Chopanki, Bhiwadi, District Alwar. 3) It is argued that petitioner being in the category of SC was allotted the said plot on SBCWP No.4984/07. 2 50% concessional basis and he deposited 25% development charges with security money amounting to Rs.36875/- with the respondent- RIICO but due to the financial crisis, petitioner could not deposited 75% of the remaining amount to the RIICO therefore, RIICO cancelled his allotment which the petitioner has prayed to now directed to be deposited with the RIICO. 4) Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned-order and other material on record, I find that the letter of allotment dated 4/2/2003 categorically stated that though the allotment was made to the petitioner at 50% concession rate but he was required to deposit 25% amount at the time of initial allotment and remaining 75% within 60 days from the date of aforesaid letter of allotment. That period of 60 days expired on 4/4/2003.It appears that thereafter time was extended on the request of the petitioner upto 15/6/2006 even though, petitioner could not SBCWP No.4984/07. 3 deposit the required amount. 5) In the facts of the case, I do not therefore deem it appropriate to directly entertain this writ petition so as to make interference by this Court. However, I set the petitioner at liberty to make a representation to the Managing Director RIICO, Jaipur. In the event of such representation being made, it is expected of him to consider and decide the same in accordance with law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil