IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14683 of 2011 1. Ebrar Alam S/O Late Jabar Alam R/O Vill.- Muradabad, P.O.- Muradabad, P.S.- Sasaram Muffasil, Distt.- Rohtas Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The District Magistrate, Rohtas 3. The Sub Divisional Officer, Sasaram 4. The Block Development Officer, Sasaram, Distt.- Rohtas 5. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Rohtas 2 16.9.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead the Officer-Incharge, Muffasil P.S.,Sasaram as party respondent no.6. The petitioner, who is a P.D.S. dealer under Panchayat Muradabad in the district of Sasaram seeks quashing of the order dated 11.7.2011 contained in memo no.118(MU) passed by the Block Development Officer, Sasaram whereby he has been directed to refund a sum of Rs.5,16,490/- towards the value of 377 quintals of undistributed rice at APL rate. Earlier similar matters had come up before this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 (Awadh Prasad Singh Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) & C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 (Suresh Prasad @ Raj Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.). The aforesaid writ applications have been disposed of by order dated 06.07.2011 after noticing the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. As the facts and issues are common, the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 would also govern the instant writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 2 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 including interim protection as mentioned therein, with the condition that the petitioner would either deposit 20% of the value of undistributed rice at Rs.10 per Kg. or the rice itself, if already not deposited within two months. This order would not come in the way of petitioner, if he wants to deposit the value of rice or rice itself in excess of 20%. KHAN (S. P. Singh, J.)