IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 2ND FEBRUARY 2009 / 13TH MAGHA 1930 RP.No. 125 of 2009() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.1856/2009 Dated 20/01/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/2ND RESPONDENT: ---------------------- TRIVANDRUM HEAD LOAD AND GENERAL WORKERS UNION (C.I.T.U) DESHABIHIMANI ROAD MELE THAMPANOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS DISTRICT GENERAL SECRETARY. BY ADV. SRI.S.MOHAMMED AL RAFI RESPONDENT(S)/WRIT PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 1 & 3: --------------- 1. SURYA SAMUDRA HOLIDAY RESORT PRIVATE LTD, PULINKUDI, MULLOOR PO, CHOWARA, VIZHINJAM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER SRI.REJEESH KUMAR S.V 2. THE DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. HOTEL AND RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES SENA (BKS VADAKKENADA,FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-23 REPRESENTED BY ITS DISTRICT SECRETARY. SMT.SUDHADEVI, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- R.P.No.125 of 2009 in W.P.(C.) No.1856 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 2nd day of February, 2009 O R D E R The review petition is filed by the 2nd respondent in the writ petition contending that they were not served notice and that the notice was served on a wrong address. It is on that ground, the review is sought for. 2. In view of the above contention raised by the learned counsel for the review petitioner, I heard him at length. 3. In spite of hearing the parties, I do not think that a case for review of the judgment has been made out. All that has been ordered is that on the 3rd of February, 2009, to which date the conciliation is now scheduled, the dispute does not end in a settlement, the Conciliation Officer should send a failure report. As already noticed in the judgment, since the power of the Conciliation Officer is only to induce the parties to settle the dispute and on its failure to send report, the judgment is not vitiated for any reason. The review petition is, therefore, disposed of. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg