IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 7486 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 17, 2010 Satya Pal Sehgal @ Satpal Sehgal. …Petitioner Versus Dharam Bir Sehgal and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Parveen Gaur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Plaintiff-respondent has filed suit for partition, which was decreed on 08.09.2008 and preliminary decree was drawn. Thereafter, plaintiff-respondent moved an application for preparation of the final decree. In the proceedings for final decree, objections were filed by the defendant-petitioner herein under Section 47 C.P.C., which were rejected by the impugned order dated 12.10.2010, observing therein that preliminary decree dated 08.09.2008 has attained finality, hence, final decree has to be drawn up and defendant- C.R.No. 7486 of 2010 petitioner has absolutely no locus to raise the ground, which ought to have been raised during the suit before passing the preliminary decree. I do not find any irregularity or jurisdictional error in the impugned order. Dismissed. November 17, 2010 (Alok Singh) vkd Judge 2