IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.631 of 2007 SURENDRA RAM @ GHOGHI RAI KSON OF LATE DIWALI RAI, R/O- VILLAGE NILKANTH TOLA, GORAIYA ASTHAN, P.S.- MANER, DISTRICT- PATNA. Versus 1. UDAY NANDAN SAHAY SON OF RAMANUJ RAI 2. RAM LAKHAN RAI, S/O- UDAY NANDAN SAHAY. 3. RISHI KUMAR, S/O- UDAY NANDAN SAHAY 4. RAM KALI DEVI, W/O- UDAY NANDAN SAHAY 5. REETA DEVI, W/O- RAM LAKHAN RAI, 6. SUNNI KUMARI, D/O- UDAY NANDAN SAHAY. ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE NILKANTH TOLA, GORAIYA ASTHAN, P.S.- MANER, DISTRICT- PATNA. 7. RAGHUVIR RAI, S/O- RAM GULERA RAI, R/O- VILLAE MIRCHI, P.S.- PATNA CITY, DISTRICT-PATNA. 8. RAM BABU RAI, S/O- KALIKA RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PANAPUR, P.S.- DANAPUR, DISTRICT- PATNA. 9. DUDHA RAI, S/O- LAL BABU RAI, R/O- NURDIPUR, P.S.- PUNPURN, DISTRICT- PATNA. For the petitioner : Mrs. Usha Kumari Singh Mr. Jitendra Kumar, Roy, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ----------- 5 20.08.2010 Petitioner (complainant) is aggrieved by the order dated 6.2.2007 whereby on inquiry, learned court below has found that the complaint appears to be a mala fide action on the part of the complainant. The Court has accorded reasons therefor. Petitioner has not even enclosed the complaint along with present application enabling the Court to go through the same. There is no merit in this application. It is accordingly dismissed. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )