IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6485 of 2007 SANJAY KUMAR & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 6 29.8.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as also the learned A.P.P. for the State. Through this application the petitioners have prayed for quashing of the order dated 10.11.2006 and 5.12.2006, wherein the learned Presiding Judge, Fast Track Court No. VI, Saharsa has rejected the petition for their discharge filed under section 227 Cr.P.C. and has also framed charges against them. It goes without saying that the petitioners can be allowed only one prayer of quashing and not more. Faced with this proposition the learned counsel for the petitioners has prayed for restricting his prayer to order dated 5.12.2006 which is the order, whereby charges have been framed against the petitioners. Once charges have been framed against the accused there is no scope for quashing the same since the charge framed can only end in conviction or acquittal. Due regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case there is merit in the application which is dismissed. Spd/- (Abhijit Sinha, J.)