1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.433 OF 1989 Mrs.Geeta Ramesh Hinduja .. Plaintiff Versus M/s.Super Leather Works & Ors. .. Defendants Mr.Kiran Nikam i/b.S.A.Ashwinkumar & Co. for plaintiffs None for defendants. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 4th September 2009. P.C.: 1] In this suit, which is filed in the year 1989, there is no written statement on record. Plaintiff is fully aware that when the suit was transferred to the list of commercial causes after the summons for judgement came to be disposed of, no steps have been taken by her to apply for a decree for want of Written Statement. Even, the defendant has failed to file written statement although the summons for judgement has been withdrawn on 19th January 1990. 2] By an order dated 10th November 2008, this Court granted twelve 2 weeks’ time to defendants to file their W.S. But no written statement is filed by the defendants. The matter appeared on board on 9th June 2009 on which date a request was made to adjourn the same as plaintiffs’ Advocate could not trace out his brief. This Court granted him time till 25th August 2009. The matter has appeared on board thereafter today and if the plaintiff indeed was interested in obtaining a decree for want of W.S., both, plaintiff should have remained present and his Advocate duly prepared to proceed with the matter. The Advocate for plaintiff once again requests for time. He states that he has not obtained instructions nor are the original documents filed to prove and substantiate the claim of the plaintiff. 2] In my view, time granted by this Court was sufficient to enable the plaintiff to obtain the decree but it appears that she is not interested in doing so. In these circumstances, the suit is dismissed for want of prosecution. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)