1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA COMPANY PETITION NO. 1 OF 2010 CACULO AUTOMOBILES PRIVATE LIMITED, a Company incorporated under the provisions of Companies Act, 1956 (Act 1 of 1956), having its Registered Office at 16, Shanta, St. Inez, Panaji Goa. 403 001. ....... Petitioner/ Transferor Company COMPANY PETITION NO. 2 OF 2010 CACULO CARS PRIVATE LIMITED, a Company incorporated under the provisions of Companies Act, 1956 (Act 1 of 1956), having its Registered Office at 16, Shanta, St. Inez, Panaji Goa. 403 001. ....... Petitioner/ Transferee Company COMPANY PETITION NO. 3 OF 2010 CACULO AUTO PARK PRIVATE LIMITED, a Company incorporated under the provisions of Companies Act, 1956 (Act 1 of 1956), having its Registered Office at 16, Shanta, St. Inez, Panaji Goa. 403 001. ....... Petitioner/ Transferor Company 2 COMPANY PETITION NO. 4 OF 2010 CACULO CARS PRIVATE LIMITED, a Company incorporated under the provisions of Companies Act, 1956 (Act 1 of 1956), having its Registered Office at 16, Shanta, St. Inez, Panaji Goa. 403 001. ....... Petitioner/ Transferee Company COMPANY PETITION NO. 5 OF 2010 M. S.B. CACULO PRIVATE LIMITED, a Company incorporated under the provisions of Companies Act, 1956 (Act 1 of 1956), having its Registered Office at 16, Shanta, St. Inez, Panaji Goa. 403 001. ....... Petitioner/ Transferor Company COMPANY PETITION NO. 6 OF 2010 CACULO CARS PRIVATE LIMITED, a Company incorporated under the provisions of Companies Act, 1956 (Act 1 of 1956), having its Registered Office at 16, Shanta, St. Inez, Panaji Goa. 403 001. ....... Petitioner/ Transferee Company Mr. Parag Rao, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. C. A. Ferreira, Central Government Advocate for the Department of Company Affairs. 3 CORAM: S. J. VAZIFDAR, J. Dated: 19th March, 2010. P.C.: 1. I have today signed six judges orders sanctioning the scheme of amalgamation between the first three Petitioners i.e. the transferor companies and the last Petitioner i.e. the transferee company which are taken on record and marked 'X'. The required procedure has been followed. The Regional Director has filed an affidavit in each of the matters stating that the scheme is not prejudicial to the interest of shareholders and the public. The Official Liquidator has filed an affidavit stating inter-alia that the affairs of the transferor companies have not been conducted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of members or public. There is nothing on record that disentitles the Petitioners from having the scheme sanctioned. 2. It is in these circumstances, the judges orders sanctioning the scheme have been signed. 3. The Company Petitions are accordingly disposed of. S. J. VAZIFDAR, J. at*