The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.23076 of 2010 Date: 20-09-2010 Between: Syed Mahaboob Hussain ..... Petitioner AND The Joint Sub-Registrar, Kurnool .....Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.K.Rathangapai Reddy Counsel for the respondent: AGP for Revenue The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue a writ, order or direction, preferably one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned endorsement No.R.O(B)Knl/29/2010, dated 30-08-2010, of the respondent in refusing to register/not entertaining the sale deed of the petitioner house property bearing H.No.44/19-8-7A, situated in Roja Street, Kurnool, Kurnool District, in favour of prospective purchaser, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the aforesaid impugned endorsement of the respondent with a direction to register the aforesaid house property.” At the hearing, the learned Counsel for both the parties have agreed that the issue raised in this Writ Petition is squarely covered by Common Order, dated 19- 02-2009, in WP.No.22684 of 2007 and batch. While disposing of the above-said batch of Writ Petitions, this Court has passed the following operative directions: “(a) In case the properties that are subject matter of the documents presented for registration before the Sub-Registrar are notified specifically under the Gazette, together with survey numbers and extent under the Wakf Act, 1995, the registering authority shall be entitled to refuse the registration by issuing an endorsement or communication to that effect; (b) if the properties are not covered by such notification, the registering authority shall be under obligation to process the documents and admit the same for registration, if they are otherwise in order.” In view of the above, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of Common Order, dated 19-02-2009, in WP.No.22684 of 2007 and batch, with the direction that the reasons and directions contained therein shall form part of this order. As a sequel, WPMP.No.29447 of 2010, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 20th September, 2010 lur