'i i ..,,.i.1. HI6HCC?URT(yCHHAm:S©AKMATBIl.AaPUR tiIVISIONBENCH CORAM: HON'Bl.E SHRIJAS&ISHBHAU^.Ag.ar. & HON'BLE SHRI &ILIP RAOSAM®&ESHttUKH, J. WritAppealNo. 159 of 2007 Apoeliant Pushpendra Kumar Kaushik S/o Lffl'aShri BhQgir-othi Kdushik.Aged about 32 years R/o villcge - Akaitcri, Tah - Jarygir, Distr-ict— Jqnjgir - Champa (C6) Vepsus Kespondents t. State 6f ChhattiS9arh, Throu^i : Commissionei'', Bhu AbhHekh lanci Settlement Chhattisgarh (C6) 2. Settlement Officer Biiaspur, District - Bilospur(C6) 3. 'The Collectpr, E>istrict - Janjgir ^- 4. ^}}w Oepu^ €^{ect<^, Wstrwt - Jarygir- CKompa <CS) Writ Apjsea! under Section 2 5uh - Sec't'ion (t) of the Ghhattisgarh High Court?Appea{tot3ivjSionBench^Aet.2CX)6 Pr-esent; Shn Sandeep Oubey, counsel -for the appiellant Shri S& Vaswtini,SGVernmentAdvoGateforthe State. (Passed on23nl0etinber, 2007) The following oral order of the Cburt woa passed by Hon^leJasdisliBhollo.Ag.CJ. IANo.1. ^ ' •'. ';• • '.•"''• • • • •• i ThiSis anapptication for condonationof deloy in filing the appeal. LeQrned counsel for theflppellantregnetsforthedelay. i In light of the facts and eireumstonees indicatedin the apptiedtion ^IA No.l) for condonation of deloy; •the deloy in filing •rtle aiipeal is condoneck -2-- I;} 1i •M. This appedl is cfirected cgairist the Judgmerrt' dated 17* Jdnuory, 2007 passed by Hon'bie 5109)0 JuclgediSmissin9 the petitidner's u»rit petition No.l97of 2007 on •the pretext that the petition beirg second writ petition, it is notmointairiable. -~~ ^ It is true that eorlier^writ petition wds fiied by the petitioner whichwasdispoSedofwiththefollou»in9direction; , "It is tilade clear that if any grievance stjll remains, the petitioners moy avaii the remedy mailable under the law inclyding filing of the petitiori before -this Court" From the perusd of paragraph 2 of the jud9ment it isclear that there is a mention of thwjud^ent dated 9 AAar'ch, 2006: As such, interest of justice would sufficeif the niatter wouid be remanded back to the Horible Single judge for consideration of the writ petitioh on merit. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed and the order passed by the Hon'ble Single judge dated I7t January;2007 is set aside, and the writ petition is restored to its original nufflber for consider'ing and decidin9 the same on merits. Sd/- Ag. Chief Justice Sd/- . DUip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge