-: 1 :- SPB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 364 OF 2008 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 364 OF 2008 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 364 OF 2008 IN IN IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 736 OF 2007 SECOND APPEAL NO. 736 OF 2007 SECOND APPEAL NO. 736 OF 2007 Hamid Ibrahim Mulla .. Petitioner. V/s. Shri Dattatraya D. Dere & Anr. .. Respondents. --- Mr. S.M.Kamble i.by F.A. Mulla for the Petitioner. Mr. S.A.Sawant for the Respondent No.1. Ms. S.V.Gajare, AGP for the Respondent No.2. --- CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 02ND DECEMBER,2008. DATED : 02ND DECEMBER,2008. DATED : 02ND DECEMBER,2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The order as translated does not appear to have considered the application for regularisation properly. Firstly, there are no reasons. Secondly there is no clarity as to whether even assuming that the work is illegal, it cannot be regularised. 2. No action for contempt of the court, however, is called for. The petition for contempt is disposed of by the following order: -: 2 :- ORDER ORDER ORDER i. The order dated 25.11.2008 is hereby set aside. ii. The respondent no.1 shall pass a fresh order in the light of what is stated above. iii. It is clarified that the delay in making the application for regularisation shall not be a ground for refusal to consider the application for regularisation. 3. Ordered accordingly. .....