3 IN THE HI&H COURT OF CHHATTIS&ARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETCTCON (S) NoMS1! OF 2011 PETinONER ^jt Narmada Prasad AAarkam S/o. Shri Balaram AAarkam, aged about 40 years, Working as Upper Division Teacher; Govt. Middle School, Shish, Biock Kota, Di'stt. Bifaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^7 ..^^ ./w/f w^~ ./, State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantraiaya, Raipur (C.&.) District Education Officer, Bitaspur, bistt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Biock Kota, Distt. Biidspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITCON UNDER ARTCCLE 226 QF THE CONSTITUTCON OF INblA ^ ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SBLHO^BLEMI^JVSTICEPmTINKBRDIWAKBR W.P.tSl.WO. 6034/2011 PETITIONBRS RESPONDENTS versus Narmada Prasad Markam State ofC.G. & Others Shri Amit Kumar Sharma, couusel for the petitioner. Shri N.Naha Roy, P.1. for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OP THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORDBR (12.10.2011) Counsel for fhe petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to benefit of two advaace increnients on accoiuit of he haviEig passed B.T.I. examination before his appoiatoaient at his own cost It is subinitted fhat the issue iavolved ia fhe present petition is no longer res integra aad fhe sacae has been finally decided by fhe Hon7ble Supreme Court m fhe case ofAsha Saxexia Vs< State ofM.P. 85 Ottrs. 2009 (III)MPJR (SC) 59. It is further subiaitted fhat fhis Court has also taken a similar view in its order dated 6.2.2009 passed m W.P.(S) No. 6257/2008. Couixsel for fhe petitioners furfher submits ttiat fhe order dated 29.4.2010 passed ia Writ Appeal N0. 124/2009, wherem relying upon the judgment offhe Supreme Court m fhe case ofAsha Saxeiia (supra) aad the order passed by this Coiirt in axiofher Writ Appeal No. 87/2009^ dircctions have been issued for consideration of the case for graat of two advance iacrements as per c&rciilar dated 21.9.1974 issued by fhe State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification of fhe facts pleaded ia the petition. Counsel for fhe State submits fhat case of fhe petitioner would also be considered on fhe sanie Unes. -^•'^ Inview ofabove, fhe petition is disposed ofwifh a dircction to fhe respondent aufhorities to decide fhe claim of fhe petitioner for graiit of two advaace iacreiaents as per circular dated 21.9.1974 issued by fhe State of Madhya Pradesh after verification of fhe facts pleaded ia the petition wifhm a penod offour axionths froin tcxlay. It is made clear fhat this Court has not exprcssed aiiy opinion on nierits offhe case aiid fhe aufhorily concenied would be at liberty to decide the same stricfly ia accordaace wifh law, Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge