IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31479 of 2009 GUDDU SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 27.8.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The attempt of the petitioner by filing this anticipatory bail for second time is not lesser serious than the earlier one for committing forgery that is using of fake judicial stamp of franking machine. The only submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is no confession of the petitioner before the Registrar General but I find no substance. There is no need of recording the confession that can be made oral and even in guarded words which have been done in this case by accepting acting for others also. The amount is also not so much relevant, nature of the act is relevant which is done in the apex body of State Judicial System by dodging it. Thus I find it not a fit case for anticipatory bail for second time. The prayer for anticipatory bail is again rejected. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI