'^i^g^ ^^€^^ l-<'lS'; n—" /^'. 3^^- 1<3^5 IN THE HON'BLE H1GH COURT OFCHHATTiSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S) N0. °>^^S /2009 PET1TIONER RESPONDENTS /f^^ f •6".^...^'~S- -^ /''" ^"\ A *!'L.6..,~,,»A*i. 'yf^S'i '§ ?w ^P ;' Vishnu Prasad Dhakate, S/o. S.L. Dhakate, Aged about 54 years, R/o. Lokanshi Niwas, Ward No. 56, Rohinipuram, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) VERSUS 1] State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Gramodyog Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) Director, Gramodyog Directorate (F-landloom Sector) Sonakhan Building, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) Deputy Director, District Handloom Otfice, Janjgir-Champa, District Janjgir-Champa(CCi) ' .4] A. Ayaz, Assistant Director Handloom, Gramodyog Directorate. Handloom Sector, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^wsi' 't^--; i'~E' - -!Ii^.,, Wt W 1<% »«»%ir 3'ST '<iWWtf, ®Tll'M<l6,fs|(1l'M^< ,.........^£:.c^..,s.uj 3!I??I'CR^T ''SS- e 6.~S. 09.07.2009 Heard Shri Miaiioi F; Shri Yashwaiif Singh Thak to3. Challeiige in the ore 30.06.2u09 passed bv petitioner who is holdm.g DiTector Handlooia has HaiidlQoia Office, Janjgir-q MahasaBiuiid and respou] place ofthe peutioner. tsent petition is to the order dated 4ie respoade.at No.l whereby fhe tli.e substanti.ve post of Assistant been traiisferred from. District thamua to Distiict Handloom Office tient No.4 has been transferred ia Contention of counsell of freauent transfer whereiji been traiisfen-ed fhree transfer order has been issti who sosiehow waats to ruay be permitted to with^ representa.tlon to tlie direction laav be issued represenTation so i&ade perform his duties in fhe pt Leanied co'ij.iisel foj peutioaer inakes a repres^ ^Rf^FT '5?TR?ff ^' T^ST 'Ci^iR ^i'sffinsn??] -Em.'i&oe, comisel for Tlie petitio:ceT. & x, Dy. A.G. ibr the State/rcsp. No. 1 trtaes issUe reitiaiE ~esot>i atid 11 tbr tlie petitioiier is that it is a case 1 withia ta¥ovears the peutioner has He furfher subinits fhat fb.e -ied at the beliest of respondeiit No.4 Cham.pa. He submits fhat he iraw the petition witli liberiy to file indec'ts. He farther s-ubsiEs tbat a to the respondents to decide the tffl fhsa Iie may be allowed to :sent place of postuig. the State has EO obiection if the n.ta.tion to the respondents aad tae saiiie is decided expeditiously. ^iasK®ii,». .^^r'^ V ^;;^"n;-s:& XI-HC—78 '•<. sn^T'qii W HSIT •3iT^?T gi<fl^) {^ ~3^ "i<l<t|10'4, fftil't-l'IS, fa<'1iy'l,< ^.^...........L».£;..CA.)....2A.(l%, sn^T TTSRT ('^f^s?) •s^nwtfesii^ Accordiagly, the petiti^ fhe atoresaid liberh'. In tll Eiakia.g such representation receipt of this order, the authoriti.es wifhm. a period o| receipt. It is clarified that ti^l relieved froia the present relieved. <!fti^i<ri<TPi *iwcii ^sifinsn^n a is disirussed as withdrawr,. witb. .e eventuality of tlie petitioiier's wittim. tea days from. fhe date of saiae would be decided bv the f three weeks froia ths date of its 1 then tlie petitioner shall not be l)lace of posting, if not already Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge -J-.