IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C. Rev. (T) No. 118 of 2008. Decided on: 29th October, 2010. Lekha Sharma. ….Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. .…Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : None. For the respondents. : Mr. P. M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. R.P. Singh, learned Assistant Advocate General has taken the Court through the judgment dated 04.01.2002, whereby a direction was issued to the Director of Education to decide the case of the petitioner within a period of two months. It can safely be presumed that the Director of Education has complied with the order dated 4th January, 2002. Consequently, there is no error apparent on the face of record. 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge October 29, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.