1 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.218/2005 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.218/2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2261/2004. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.RN Deokar, Adv. for petitioner; Mr.VB Ghatge, AGP for State. *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 30 th November, 2010. ... 1) Representation of the petitioner was to be decided within two months from 11.4.2005. 2) There is nothing to illustrate that whether the representation is not yet attended. However, communication dated 16th November, 2005 from Education Officer to the petitioner, giving reference to the contempt petition clarifies that the petitioner was required to move her representation to the management as the Department has already communicated to the management. 2 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.218/2005 In the light of this, the purpose of the contempt petition is virtually achieved. Nothing survives in the contempt petition. Contempt Petition is disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/