@ C /O‘OZ—\ N IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.5No. MU /2oo,;5; (3.34 pETI'i‘IONER ‘ Amalgam Singh Tandon, S/o Late Shri Amol Das, aged about 38 years, R/o Bachhali, Kota, Ratanpur, distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS i; State of Chhattisgarh , Through Secretaly , Education Department , D..S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) g. Director of public Instruction Pensionbada Raipur (C.G.) ’ 69‘ N WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226OF r THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA K $ ” @ 6H COURT O CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPU§ W. P. (S) No. 1169 of 2007 Pe‘ri‘l'ioner : Him Singh Tmdon Versus Rzspondems State of Chhaftisgarh & ano'ther Singh Bench: Hon‘ble Mr. Justice 5afish K. Agnihotri. Mr. Kumaresh Timri, Advocafe for ‘H'Ie petifianer. Smt Anju Ahuja, Depu‘ry Govemmznf Advocate for the State/respondents. ORDER (Passed on this 28’” Day of February, 2007) lmmed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is working as Assistant Tenrher/Lecturer. The petitioner obtained B. Ed. Examination certificate on 26-4-1996, on his own expenses. Learned counsel wpearing for the petitioner submits that the question invoived, herein asto whether the teacher, who obtained B. Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses is entitled to two advance increments. According to learned counsel for the petitioner. the petitioner is entitled to two advance increments in view of the decision of this Court in the case of Vashwant Kmr Bhorodwai Vs. Municipal Corporation. Burg aid another {2006 CH) MPJR~C6 96}. This Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, burg and another (Supra) came to the conclusion that the teachers, who had obtained B. Ed. /B.T.I. Examination aw own @ expgnses, are covered by the circular du'red 24.12.98 imd by the state Government of Mya Pmdzdt. Learned counsel for fhz pefifioner further submits flan? fhe facts and question of law involved in the present case are squarely covered byl decision of this Court in the case of Vashwcnt Kumar Bhamdwaj Vs. Municipal Corporatian, Burg and another (supra), to which learned counsel appearing for the respondents fairly concedes and agrees with the everment made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwan‘l' Kunmr Bhmdwai Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B. Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 . & 1.3.1999 and further whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. l l l Sd/- isatish K.Aguihotri 1 7i Judge Subhash