AJN 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1755 OF 2009 Kishor Shashikant Somwanshi. ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Sachin Gite i/b Mr. M.S. Karnik for the petitioner. Ms. P.H. Kantharia, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & R.G. KETKAR, JJ. DATED : 15TH JULY, 2009. P.C.:- 1. The petitioner’s case is that his father Shashikant Somwanshi was attacked by five persons. They are respondents 4 to 8 herein. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent 2 has failed to investigate this case properly. According to the petitioner though respondent 2 was in possession of certificate indicating that Shashikant AJN 2 Somwanshi received a grievous injury, he intentionally and deliberately avoided to produce it before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Niphad in order to favour respondent 7. According to the petitioner, he addressed a representation to respondent 3 making a complaint about the behaviour of respondent 2 and requesting him to take action against him. Respondent 3 has, however, not dealt with the said representation. He has not sent any reply to the petitioner. 2. In the circumstances, we direct respondent 3 to consider representation dated 27/5/2009 addressed by the petitioner to him with all seriousness that it deserves. Respondent 3 shall consider the said representation and if found necessary take such action as may be required in accordance with law. The representation may be considered within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order by him. He shall communicate the result of consideration of the representation to the petitioner. The representation may be considered independently and in AJN 3 accordance with law. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. 3. So far as the second prayer regarding cancellation of bail is concerned, it is not possible for us to pass any order in that behalf. It will, however, be open to the petitioner to adopt appropriate proceedings in accordance with law for that relief. On that aspect also, we have not expressed any opinion. 4. The petition is disposed of in the aforestated terms. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [R.G. KETKAR, J.]