c ' ^ \oo Q^ 3:8 IN THE HIGH COORT OF JUDICATOBE :CHHATTISGaRH:BIIASPaR WRIT PETITIO&NO : ~ 7 3_3 OE 2005 I2SCITIONER M.R.Sawant, aged 44 _yrs,s/o shri R.M.Sawant Lectyrer : J.N.Pandey, Govt. Multipurpose Hi.gher Secondary School : Raipur CG -VERSUS- -o SESSQSfBaiTS ^•^^^ ^^,;! ^^&^ ^$c%^";' ...^•^^•^-^ THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Through : The Seeretary tp the Govt. of Chhattisgarli, School Education Department, Mantralaya : Raipur CG '^L. A.A£^L ^TI Raipur CG G~^ ^. \ ^^¥^~_. ^^'y^\/*'^2. The Sistrict Education, Officer cv- ^^^- i ,.**"°" 3. The Principal, J.N.Pandey Goyt. Multipurpose Higher • , ' Secondary School : Raipiir CG WRIT PE'EItICat ONDER ARTICLE 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA wroa HI6H COURTOFCHHATTES6ARH AT BILASPUR W.P.No,799of2005 Petitioner M.R. Sawont Versus Respondents The 5'ta+e of Chhattisgarh Aothers Single Bench: Hbn'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. Shr-i Anurng ShrivastcwQ, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri V.V.5. Moorthy, Dy. Advocate Seneral with Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. 6ovt. Advocate for the respondents/State. ORDER ith (lfh0ctober,2006) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that while working as Lecturer, the petitioner has gone on training to improve his qudlifications on hisownexpenses and acquired B. Ed. Examination Certifieate on 29.6.1991 from Barkatulloh University, Bhopal (Annexure P/3). 2. According to tearned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to two advance increments in view ofthe decision of this Court in the case of Yadiwont Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. AAunicipal Corporation, Durg and ahother {2006 CEE) MPJR-CG T 96}. This Court in the caseof Yashwouit Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipat Corporort-ion, Durg omd ouiother (Supro), camje to the cpnclusion that the teachers, who had obtained B. Ed. 1B! ;: ^ybhosh Examination Certificate on his own expenses,are covered by the circular dated 24.12.98 (Annexure P/l) issued by the State Sovernment of Madhyo Pradesh. 3. Learned counsel for the petjtioner further submits that the facts and question of taw inyotved in the present case is squarely covered by decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (5upra), to which learned counsel appearing for the respondents fairly concedes and qgrees with theaverment made by leamed counsel dppearing for the pstitioner. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passedin the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporatjon, Durg and another (5upra), subject to verification of -the fact as to whetiier the petitioner has acquired B. Ed. as to costs. tiFS" ;;l.;:!;.:^K::^^^i ^•:u?:'N^?i^a^!%' Examination Certificate on his own expenses or not. No order Sd/- SatisbK.Agnibotn Judge