BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Eighteenth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.13641 of 2011 SANTHA ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NITHIRAVILAI POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. T.ARUL Advocate For Respondent : K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest, the petitioner, in Crime No.154 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 302, 201 and 177 of the Indian Penal Code, has come forward with this petition seeking for anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of the prosecution, the deceased is the husband of the petitioner and he was a drunkard. In a drunken stage, on 16.10.2010 it is alleged that he scolded the petitioner in a filthy language and on hearing the same, the first accused/her son in this case attacked the deceased with cricket bat which resulted in the death of the deceased. The investigation has been completed and the charge sheet has also been filed and the same was produced before this Court for perusal. 3. A perusal of the charge sheet would go to show that the petitioner has got no role to play in the attack on the deceased. Even according to the charge sheet, she is the accused of offence under section 201 read with 302 of IPC and Section 177 of IPC. 4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the petitioner has not caused any injury on the deceased and she has got no role to play in the murder of the deceased and further the offence under section 201 of IPC upon which the petitioner is accused of, is bailable, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on her appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate NO.II, Kuzhithurai on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ before the respondent police every day at 10.30 am., for a period of four weeks. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C Scrupulously. sd/- 18/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.II KUZHITHURAI 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT AT NAGERCOIL 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NITHIRAVILAI POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. T.ARUL Advocate SR.No.35912 GH : 19.10.2011 : 2p/6c ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13641 of 2011 Date :18/10/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/