IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.11952 of 2011 Date of Decision : July 12, 2011. Rashmi Tyagi .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Vivek Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Charu Tuli, Senior DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Ms.Charu Tuli, learned Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of the order which I propose to pass, there is no necessity to seek any counter-reply from the respondents at this stage. The petitioner is working as Guest Faculty Lecturer in Chemistry in respondent No.3-college. She seeks a direction that she be not relieved from her assignment with a view to adjust other Guest Faculty (Lecturer) in her place. C.W.P.No .11952 of 2011 2 Ms.Charu Tuli, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, states that as a matter of policy and subject to the petitioner's eligibility and availability of work, the Guest Faculty (Lecturers) like the petitioner are not to be substituted by another set of Guest Faculty (Lecturers). The writ petition is disposed of in the above-stated terms. Dasti. July 12, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE