IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44728 of 2010 BHOLA YADAV, SON OF LATE BHUMI YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 27.01.2011 At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner points out that in prayer portion in place of Additional Sessions Judge-II, Naugachiya it has wrongly been typed as Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Naugachiya. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary corrections within course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Naugachiya P.S. Case No. 09 of 2010 registered under Sections 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Although, petitioner is named in the First Information Report but admittedly, the informant is not an eye-witness of the alleged occurrence. The impugned order of learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge does not disclose any specific material against the petitioner. Having similar allegation, several co-accused persons are enjoying the privilege of bail. In view of the aforesaid circumstances above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-II, Naugachiya in connection with above stated Naugachiya P.S. Case No. 09 of 2010 (Sessions Trial No. 787 of 2010). Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)