IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16700 of 2008 1.UMA NATH SINGH son of late Heera Singh, Resident of village-Gorphar, P.S.-Dandkhora, District-Katihar ……. ……Petitioner Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.Nirmala Rani Singh, @ Nirmala Singh, wife of Late Bhuganj Prasad Singh, resident of village- Langra Bagan, P.S.-Sadar, Katihar,Dist.-Katihar …… …….Opp. Parties. ----------- 2. 1.7.2010. Herad Mr.Bindhya Keshari Kumar, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this court under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has prayed for quashing of the order dated 5.12.2005 passed by Shri Bipin Bihari Lal, Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-III, Katihar, in Cr.Revision No.74 of 1999. By the said order the learned Additional Sessions Judge has refused to interfere with the order of Magistrate dated 29.7.1999 passed in Case No.45 of 1996 whereby possession of first party has been declared over the disputed land. I have perused both the orders. The learned revisional court has dealt with the matter in detail. This court finds nothing on record to interfere with both the orders. However, the parties can avail remedy before appropriate forum. With the above observation, this petition stands rejected. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)