1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.320 OF 2008 Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Mahasangh ....Petitioner. V/s Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane District & Others. ..... Respondents. ----- Ms. R.J. Todankar for the Petitioner. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND V. M. KANADE, J. DATE : 22ND APRIL, 2008. P.C.: 1. The respondents have been served as per the record of the registry. Nobody is present on behalf of the respondents. Nobody is present even on behalf of the Security Guards Board. 2. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submits that no application has been filed and nothing has been stated on record on behalf of the respondents to the State Government under section 23 of the Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1981 and this matter is fully covered by the two different judgments of two Division 2 Benches of this Court. 3. Accordingly this Writ Petition is disposed in terms of the two Division Bench Judgments of this Court in the case of Security Association of India Vs. Union of India and Ors in Writ Petition No.1804 of 2007 with other connected Writ Petitions decided on 26th March, 2008 and in the case of Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi Vs. The Security Guards Board for Gr Bombay & Thane Dist. & Ors in Writ Petition No.563 of 2007 with other connected Writ Petitions decided on 21st June, 2007. However, the period mentioned in both these judgments would commence from today. 4. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of with no order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE V.M. KANADE, J.