•G'~Jvr^~~^ </ ^"^r'--i~^^-^'--^r-r. E HIGH COURT OF CfflS^TTISGARH AT BILASPUR (^ Misc. Appeal No. ^^) of 2002 -r Appellant/Cliaiment VERSUS Respondent/Emplo-i ^*?^J^ filauram S/o Nanda, Ramnagar, WardNo. 5, Behind BNC Mills, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Executive Engineer, I^JWater Resources Department, y ^C.G. Govt, / Post-Chuikhadan, Dist. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ..^s^^ ^ .1^^^^^^R-^BtfTION_30_gF_WORKMEN^S_COMPENSATION_ApT^923 FHC—78 p/~ an^i ^T ^iioh ^TF^T^T'SRN' WWII thlicft "3^ ^l|<4td^, ^Tll^'Ko, fcs«rtl^^< . M^- ..^:.......<2^).. ^ 200 ^- STI^T •q^EF (li<=<f'la<<^) ^nw^f^^^i SB: _N. 23-07-2009 •cb^i^^ih "RT^* ^* fe^ Tf^?R ^affipTa^l Shrl H.B.. Agrawal, Seniorj counseJ for the appeJIant Shri Sarjsh <5upta, ©ovt.A^/ocate for the State. Advocate with Srnt. Meera Jaiswai, With consent of thepartiss ^ the matter is heard finally, at motlon stage. The Instunt petition js 14-01-2002 passed by passed] compensation, Rajnandgaon In ca4 whereby snd whereunder ths appl appcliant has.been dismissed on th| preferred after 40 years from', th| action. Shrl H.B. Agrawai, iearned' Sectlon 4 of the Workmen's Actl respondent to ^ the .amou| ^deposited the same, the appjicGtio directed Ggajnst the oraer dated by Commissjoner for Workmen's |e No. 150-B/^/WC Aet (N.F.)/2001 lcation for compensation flied'by the ^ ground that the Gppljcation has besn ^ of accruol of alieged cause; of [Senior AdvocQte submjts that 'under It necessary for the ^t of compensation and having hot |i filed after 40 years-of accrual\of I CQuse of action can be entertained fc|/ condoning the deiay of 40 y'sars. '. ^!^?1>^T<t^W •^ JW •:^^t~W1^ rW7S-. f^T: ^^, , .^...K.A....-........^.../............^2oo L 37J^i ^^K (^y^) 'F?nw^f^y w^? -•^- Per .contra, Iearned| submjts that such inordin|it® delay that too without assi'gnlng .cogent.- reasons cannot b4 entertained and the CofTimissJoner ^WQrk^ian^ Compensation ha appll'cQt'Soh of the appsiiant. >e^a^v-.HGving heard iearned has rlghtly rejectBd the settied that such cn appjjca: 4>i^S^f4nI??£^t^* fe^t TN^n ^ ^^ s^ counseJ for ^ right!y the order rejecting the |:ounse! for the parties the record, In my.oplnion, the (tommlssioner, Workmen's Compensation appljcation of the -appeitant which preferred after 40 years of accrual of of action^ It is 'jon cannot be aliowed that too In strong reasons have nbt by the for the appeh'ant for preferhng the appli'cation after a lapse of 40 years. In of above, the|appea! is iiable to be and is hcreby d ism ! '-~"^-~-~--— No order as to costs. j _ SdA. Judge Kv" •K K- ^^J ! ^'R-r^m^- .-'.s/95—i 1 /200H—-1.00.000.