IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD JULY 2008 / 1ST SRAVANA 1930 W.P(C).No. 22240 of 2008(V) -------------------------- AGAINST I.A 672/08 IN OP(ELE.)2/2005 OF MUNSIFF COURT,HARIPAD .................... PETITIONER: ------------ RADHABHAI, AGED 53, W/O.VISWANATHAN, MANGALALAYATHIL (MUNJANAD) MUTHUKULAM VADAKKUM MURI, MUTHUKULAM VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.G.BENO RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. SEETHABHAI, W/O.SAJEEVAN, SAJITH BHAVANAM, MUTHUKULAM, VADAKKUM MURI, MUTHUKULAM VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 2. BHANUMATHI, W/O.BALAKRISHNAN ACHARY, VALUPARAMBIL, MUTHUKULAM VADAKKUM MURI, MUTHUKULAM VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J. ........................................... WP(C).No. 22240 OF 2008 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 23rd DAY OF JULY, 2008 JUDGMENT This petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India challenging Ext.P7 order passed by Munsiff, Harippad in I.A.672 of 2008 in O.P(ele) No.2 of 2005, refusing to reopen the evidence to adduce further evidence, as sought for by the petitioner. 2. On hearing the learned counsel, I do not find any illegality or irregularity in Ext.P7 order, warranting interference. Petitioner is entitled to challenge the order along with final decree. Petition is dismissed. M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE lgk/-