IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 26233 of 2005 Between: 1 D.Narasimha Reddy S/o.D.Achi Reddy R/o.Babaguda, H/o.Shamirpet Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 2 K.Damodar Reddy S/o.Krishna Reddy R/o.Bomraspet Village, Shamirpet mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Special Chief Secretary Revenue (ASN.V) Department, Secretariat, Hyd. 2 District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, at Hyderabad. 3 Mandal Revenue Officer, Shamirpet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 4 Chief Commissioner of Land Administration Government of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad. 5 M/s Leo Meridian Resorts and Developers (Pvt.) Limited rep. by its Managing Director, Bomraspet Village, Shamirpet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.VENKATARAMANA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR ASSIGNMENT The Court made the following Order: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “To issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the first respondent in suggesting compromise between the parties as per para 18 of G.O.Rt.No.2039 dated 24-10-2005 while dismissing the revision petition of the fifth respondent as arbitrary and illegal and consequently set aside that part of the order of the first respondent in G.O.Rt.No.2039 dated 24-10-2005 and direct the respondents to make available the village road connecting Upperpaly to Ponnal village to the petitioners and all other villagers by demolishing the compound wall of the fifth respondent.” At the hearing, Sri Vedula Venkataramana, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that the petitioners are not interested in pursing this writ petition. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP.No.33679 of 2005 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. _________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dt:07.07.2008 Usd