^- WGH COURT OF CHHAniSGAIW AT BLASPUB Single^Mch : Hon'ble Shri OiliD RaosahebOeshmukh.A Aooellanff Claimant Resoondent^ Non-aoriicanfs M.A.(C»No.1468of2(W7 Lokesh Kumar Sahu, S/o Shri Kanhaiya Lal Sahu, Aged about 45 years, R/o Semra (BhsAhara) Sub Tehsil BhaUiara, District Dhamtari C.G. versus 1. Kianupratap Sahu, S/o Shri Vishal Sahu, Aged about 35 yeara, R/o Dudhava, Tehsil Nagri, District Dhamtari, Present AdAass Mathpuraina, Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 2. The New India Insurance Company Ltd., In front of Pro^ect AirtomobB®, Bhitai, rastrict Durg C.G. Aopeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehi<fcs Act Present:- Shri Atok Dewangan, counsel for the appellant. ORALORDER (Passed on this 1SU> day ofAriy, 20<W) Heard on I.A. No.01/2007 which is an appBcatfon fw condonation of delay in fflng the appeal. 2) For the reasons mentroned in the appfcaUon, it s aflowed aml the ctolay in fflmg the appeal is condoned. . 3) Heard on admfeskm. 4) Award dated 08-08-2007 psssed hi Claim <^se No.1670006 by Addttional Motor Acckterrt Claims Tribunal, Dhanrtari b perused. 5) The appellanVclaimant has miserably iailad to prove that the grievous hi^iries suffered in right knee was as a result of the accident. (^ The disaKlity certifcate was dated 26-TO-2007 whlte the accident occurred on 13-05-2006. The Tribunal has givencogent reason for disbetievmg the evKlence ofthe daftnant and for holdmg that the ctahnant had suffered simpte hjuries. In view ofthe reasons contained in para 12 of the award and the injuries sulfered by the cta«nart,the compensatfon of Rs.20,00(y- awarded by the Tribunal is just and reasonable compensatton and does nrt call for any interference in this appeal. (5) In the result, there is no mert in this appeal whfch is accordu^ly dismissed at the stage ofadmissfon. - Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge ^^