1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER SB Cr Misc Bail Application No.7307/2010 Smt Vimla Devi & anr Vs State of Rajasthan 7.12.2010 HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Harendra Sinsinwar - for the petitioners Mr Laxman Meena, PP – for the State Mr Lokesh Sharma – for complainant BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that main allegations exist against husband Parmeshwar Lal and so far petitioners are concerned, they may be granted bail as the dowry articles have to be returned by husband only. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for complainant have opposed the bail application. After taking into consideration the rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, 2 which may otherwise affect the outcome of the trial, but looking to the facts of this case, I allow this bail application under Section 438 CrPC. Therefore, the SHO/IO of the Police Station – Bagad, Jhunjhunu is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner/s Smt Vimla Devi and Smt Mukesh in FIR No. 80/2010 registered for offence under Section/s 498A, 323, 406 and 147 IPC, he shall enlarge them on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i)They shall make themselves available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required; (ii)They shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; (iii)They shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (iv) They shall not commit same and similar offence during the period of bail. (MN Bhandari), J. bnsharma