IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.36597-M of 2009 Date of Decision:6.4.2011 Paramjit Kaur .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The only prayer is for issuance of directions to the respondents to submit the status report on the complaint filed by the petitioner to respondents No.2 and 3. Reply by way of affidavit of Balbir Singh, P.P.S., Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division Bholath, District Kapurthala, has been filed. As per the said reply, the application Annexure P-2 was moved to the Sr. Superintendent of Police, Kapurthala, which was forwarded to Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division Bholath, who entrusted the same to SHO, P.S. Bholath for enquiry. It is further submitted that both the parties were summoned on 2.10.2009, 5.10.2009, 6.10.2009, 7.10.2009, 8.10.2009 and 15.10.2009, but the petitioner Paramjit Kaur did not join the enquiry. As such ex-parte enquiry was conducted. It was held in the enquiry report that the application was moved to defame Piara Singh due to partisan during election. As such, the application was found false and it was recommended by the SHO that application may be consigned to record Crl. M. No.36597-M of 2009 -2- room. Deputy Superintendent of Police agreed with the recommendations and forwarded to the Sr. Superintendent of Police, Kapurthala, who filed the same. In view of the above, the present petition is rendered infructuous. However, in case the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to file a criminal complaint or avail of any other alternative remedy in accordance with law. 6.4.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE