THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.BHAVANI PRASAD W.P.No.12065 of 2010 ORDER: (Per Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) This writ petition is filed seeking a writ of certiorari assailing the order, dated 15.12.2009, passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (for short ‘the Tribunal’) allowing O.A.No.353 of 2005 filed by the first respondent seeking to declare the proceedings, dated 07.01.2005, issued by the third petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. The brief facts of the case are that in pursuance of the notification issued by the petitioners in 2003, the first respondent applied for the post of Police Constable and was provisionally selected for the said post, but the petitioners have not sent him for training. While so, the third petitioner issued proceedings, dated 07.01.2005, cancelling his provisional selection on the ground that he involved in Crime No.107 of 2001 of Atmakur Police Station for the offences under Section 387 IPC read with Section 5 of Essential Commodities Act, 1955. Challenging the said proceedings, the first respondent filed O.A.No.353 of 2005 before the Tribunal, which in turn allowed the said O.A. by setting aside the said proceedings. Further, it directed the petitioners to consider the case of the first respondent for sending him for training as he was selected after due process of selection for the post of Police Constable and pass appropriate orders by ignoring his involvement in the above crime. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners filed the present writ petition. 3. Heard the learned Government Pleader for Services-I appearing for the petitioners and perused the material on record. 4. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, Learned Government Pleader for Services-I has produced a copy of an application form along with attestation form submitted by the first respondent. We have perused the Attestation Form, wherein the first respondent had clearly mentioned in Column No.12 with regard to his arrest in Crime No.107 of 2001 and release of him on bail after five days of his arrest and that the case was ended in acquittal vide judgment, dated 23.01.2004 in S.C.No.75 of 2003 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge, Warangal. The first respondent has submitted his application form on 28.01.2004 i.e., after his acquittal in the Sessions Case. It is not in dispute that though the first respondent involved in the crime, he was acquitted of the offence charged against him at the time of submission of his application form. It is also not in dispute that he was provisionally selected for the post of Police Constable. Therefore, involvement of the first respondent in the crime itself is not a ground for denial of appointing him as Police Constable by the petitioners. In view of the same, we find no illegality or irregularity in the order impugned warranting interference by this Court. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. _____________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED,J ____________________ G.BHAVANI PRASAD, J Date:08.06.2010. sj