WP(C) 3692/2009 MCBEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B K SHARMA Heard Mr. U Dutta, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. I Alam, lea rned counsel representing the respondent No.6. I have also heard Mr. C Baruah, l earned counsel representing the APSC as well as Ms. R Chakraborty, learned Addit ional Sr. Government Advocate representing the State, Assam. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenge the appointment of respondent No.6 as Research Assistant under the respondent on the ground that he did not have 3 years experience as LDA in any office under the Government of As sam as stipulated in the Advertisement dated 28.07.2008. The respondent Nos.4 an d 6 in their affidavits have denied the aforesaid plea of the petitioner. In bot h the affidavits it has been stated that, before appointment of the respondent N o.6, he had been working as LDA in the Office of the District Institute of Educa tion and Training (DIET), Golaghat since February, 1996. It has also been stated that the said institute is under Government of Assam. In this connection the co mmunication dated 16.09.2009 made by the Government of Assam in the Education De partment confirming that DIET is a Government Office. The aforesaid plea of the respondents has been denied by the petitioner without, however, any material to show that the respondent No.6 lacked in the stipulated experience. Pursuant to the aforesaid advertisement, the respondent No.6 was selected and he has been working in the new assignment since 09.06.2009. Having regard to such position I am not inclined to interfere with the appointment made in favour of t he respondent No.6. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed.