A’ IN Td HIGH CJ OF ATGLO Datedthis the 3rd day of pril 1998 TH HON’B1 Mr.3U6TI V,K.bINGrL iRIT PITION NO.20178 01 1 9 9 1 Between The £‘atjgna1 4inera1 Development Corporation Limited, a company irorporateo under the ‘-ompanies Act, 1956, having its Registered Office at Castle Hills 0 MasaD Tank Hyderaoad—26, and one of its Units at ionimalai, Donimalai Township ellary Distreict, represented herein by the General Manager b,K,Agarawal ,,Petitioner (Sri Ramadas, Aovocate> 1. The 4andal Panchayat, t3huj anganagar, P, O.Sanaur, anour laluk, i3ellary District represented oy its Praahan hri 0.Shanmukhappa ano its becretary hri S.r.Hadapati. 2. The hula arishad, ellary ?ost,eellary, representea Dy its Chief becretary .. esponaents (ri Hiremath, dvate caveator aria Patil sscciates for —2i rit Wetitionis filed pcayn to quasn AnneXUreS—B and L dated 7.2.91 aria 5.8.91 Dearing No,L42.7:9U—91 aria 219/90—91 passed y responoents—1 aria 2 respectively etc. This f.titian coming on for hearing t5ay, Court maae tne following. oraer —2— ORLR The petiticxier is aggrieved oy tne order passeo oy the Chief 3crtary, Z1la Parisnad,ôellary, in appeJ preferred by the petitioner, It is stated y the larned Comse1 for the petitioner tt the sajo ordeixing theount at Rs,l,00,000/— is without any basis ana in accordare with annexure—H,Tne Ratable value comes to only Rs.4,03,404—OO, 2. arguments of otn the learnea ounsel for tne parties have oeen heara. 3. It appears timt tne petitioner was prevented by sufficient cause in appearing Defore the appellate authority. Factual aspect or the matter has not been discussed at length. It would oe proper to quasn the oroer datea and 5—8—91 and the matter is remitted,to him to decide afrash taking into consideration the factual aspect of tne matter aria after hearing the petitioner. The petitioner snali. apeax aetore ne appellate authority on 27—4—1998 without awaiting for further notice from him. 4, writ Petition is allowed witn tne ae ,erv cit ions.