IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42895 of 2008 SIRDA RAI @ SIRDA PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a police case under sections 337,353/34 and other provisions of the Penal Code. The defence is of false implication. In any event, he was only a members of the mob. The parentage does not tally with that of the petitioner. The allegations are of the death of a lineman of the Electricity Department when busy bodies encashed the opportunity to take the law into their own hands by blocking the highway, setting tires on fire, pelting stones on vehicles and damaging official vehicles. Those who become a social menace, unmindful to the inconvenience to others, as busy bodies, do no deserve the privilege of anticipatory bail. Issue of identification can more appropriately be considered in an application for regular bail. The application is rejected. HR ( Navin Sinha )