[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.2325 OF 2008 Nagraj Kundanmal Mehta .... Plaintiff Vs. M/s. Tibrewala Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. .... Defendants Ms Krupa Kashid i/b Shri S.K. Jain for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SHRI A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: MARCH 31, 2009 P.C: P.C: P.C: 1. This suit is for recovery of the price of the goods sold and supplied to the defendants. The suit goods were sold under Invoice No.133, dated 5-7-2006 for Rs.94,275/-. The defendants accepted the goods without complaining about the quality, quantity, etc.. The defendants did not pay the price of the goods despite legal notice sent on 23-6-2007. The defendants through their letter dated 15-5-2008 disputed their liability saying that the goods were not delivered on time. However, they did not enter their appearance after the suit summons was served on them. They did not file their written statement. The plaintiff has filed on record the original documents. So whatever is stated in the plaint and through the documents has gone [2] unchallenged against the defendants. The case of the plaintiff deserves to be believed and the suit deserves to be decreed. The suit stands decreed as prayed for. However, the interest payable on the amount due from the date of filing of the suit till the amount is realised shall be simple interest at the rate of 6% per annum. 2. The office to refund the Court fee as per rules. (A.V. Nirgude, J.) ss/M9ss2325.8 ss/M9ss2325.8 ss/M9ss2325.8