IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 14TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 23RD KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 33623 of 2008(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- C.G.SURESH, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.LATE GOPALAN NAIR, CHERIYATHAZHA, CHIRAKKADAVU CENTRE P.O., KANJIRAPPALLY. (CLERK, S.R.V.N.S.S. V.H.S.S., CHIRAKKADAVU). BY ADV. SRI.ESM.KABEER RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KANJIRAPPILLY. 3. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A & E), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE PRINCIPAL, S.R.V.N.S.S.V.H.S.S. CHIRAKKADAVU, PONKUNNAM. BY GOVTL PLEADER SRI. A.J. VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.33623/2008 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of November, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner submits that, on the basis of Ext.P1 audit objection, proposal has been initiated to recover the loss alleged to have been sustained from out of her salary. It is stated that, though on receipt of Ext.P1 he has filed his explanation (Ext.P2) to the 2nd respondent, the 2nd respondent has not finally decided the matter and that in the meanwhile recovery steps are being initiated. 2. Having regard to the above facts, I feel that what is appropriate at this stage is to direct the 2nd respondent to finalize Ext.P1, taking into account Ext.P2 reply filed by the petitioner. This the 2nd respondent shall do with notice to the petitioner and as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within six weeks from the date of production of a copy WP(c).No.33623/2008 2 of the judgment. It is directed that, in the meanwhile, proceedings for recovery pursuant to Ext.P1 shall be kept in abeyance. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE vi. WP(c).No.33623/2008 3