IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 23RD MARCH 2009 / 2ND CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 9182 of 2009(P) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- C.K.SHOUKATHALI, CHIRAPARAMBIL HOUSE, KIZHUPILLIKKARA, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR. MR.P.N.SANTHOSH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.9182 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 23rd day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner states that by Ext.P1, regular permit has been granted to him subject to settlement of timings. Timings is yet to be settled. In the meanwhile, he is operating on the strength of temporary permit and Ext.P3 is stated to the latest application that has been made for temporary permit, and orders have not been passed on that application also. It is in these circumstances, the writ petition has been filed. 2. Taking into account the above grievance of the writ petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:- That the respondent shall settle the timings consequent on Ext.P1 grant. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months of production of a copy of this judgment. It is directed that, in the meanwhile, on production of a copy of this judgment, and within two weeks thereafter orders shall be passed on Ext.P3 application made by the petitioner for temporary permit as well. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg