IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC NO.605 OF 2011 MAMTA KUMARI, W/O LALAN PASWAN, R/O VILLAE SINGHARI, P.O. SINGHARI, P.S GOH, DISTT,AURANGABAD. …………………PETITIONER. VERSUS 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2.SRI VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, COMMISSIONER, MAGADH DIVISION, GAYA. 3.SRI KUNDAN KUMAR, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, AURANGABAD. 4.SRI RAM NIVAS PANDEY, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, AURANGABAD. 5.SRI DILIP KUMAR, DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER, AURANGABAD. 6.MANISHA RANI, CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, GOH, AURANGABAD. 7.RITA DEVI, MUKHIA, FAG GRAM PANCHAYAT, R/O VILLAGE & P.O. FAG, P.S GOH DISTT AURANGABAD. 8.SHILA DEVI, W/O ANJANI KUMAR,R/O VILLAGE AND P.O. SINGHARI, P.S. GOH, DISTT AURANGABAD. ………………………OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 02/ 22.09.2011 Heard counsel for the parties. Having regard to the fact that the petitioner complains violation of interim order of this Court without any proof of the fact that the copy of such order was served on the opposite parties, this Court must hold the contempt application to be premature and not maintainable. That being so, this application is permitted to the withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to bring the aforementioned interim order, if it is 2 still in operation, to the notice of the opposite parties who are always expected to act in accordance with law and in terms of the interim order till the same remains in force. With the aforementioned observation and direction, this application is disposed of. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)