IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL No. 138 OF 200 APPEAL No. 138 OF 200 APPEAL No. 138 OF 2002 Balu Balu Balu T. Navghire T. Navghire T. Navghire APPELLANT APPELLANT APPELLANT Vs. Vs. Vs. Maniram Maniram Maniram K. Shewale & Ors. K. Shewale & Ors. K. Shewale & Ors. RESPONDENT RESPONDENT RESPONDENTS Mr. Ajay Patil i/b Mr. P. K. Dhakephalkar, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. P. S. Dani, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. DATE DATE DATE : JULY 14, 2006. : JULY 14, 2006. : JULY 14, 2006. P.C. . Heard the learned AGP for the Appellant and the Respondent. Mr. P. S. Dani, the learned counsel for the Respondent says that the appellant died quite a few years back. It seems that the appeal was dismissed on 10th February, 2004. Over and above Mr. Dani says that in spite of repeated attempts, none of the legal heirs of the Appellant have contacted him. The learned Advocate for Appellant seeks a discharge. In view of the above, the learned Advocate for Appellant is discharged in the above matter. 2. The learned counsel states that pursuant to the order passed by this Court, Respondent had furnished bank guarantee while withdrawing certain - 2 - amounts, deposited in the court. In view of disposal of the appeal, he seeks discharge of the bank guarantee. Bank guarantee issued by the Respondent stands discharged and the Registrar General is directed to return back the discharged bank guarantee to the Appellant. [ Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.] Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.] Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]