IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 10835 of 2008. Decided on: 23.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Ramesh Kumar. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. R.D. Kaundal, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): The case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that he was engaged as daily waged Peon in the office of Block Development Officer, Dharampur, District Solan on 18th February, 1994. He has completed ten years service with 240 days in each calendar year. If that is so, the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner, with all consequential benefits. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - 2. Consequently, in view of the above observations, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 23, 2010. (sck).