IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29013 of 2010 RAMOD KUNWAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10.08.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bachhwara P.S. Case No. 79 of 1997 registered under Sections 302, 307/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Since the case was instituted in the year 1997, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is rejected. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that though in the F.I.R. there is specific allegation of firing against this petitioner but during trial of the co- accused Ram Agyan Jha, the informant deposed as P.W. 8 who specifically alleged that one Ashok Singh and one another person fired on the deceased. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner keeping in view the fact that the informant 2 during trial has specifically alleged the fatal blow against Ashok Singh and one another and pass the appropriate order on the undertaking of the petitioner that he will regularly appear during the trial. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)