1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3135 OF 2010 (Anoopkumar M. Mohta) -: VERSUS :- (Leelabai L. Shende & Others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri A. S. Chandurkar Adv for petitioner. Shri A. M. Ghare Adv for respondents. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : OCTOBER 5, 2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner/plaintiff wanted an issue independently to be framed to show his entitlement to recover arrears of rent. Shri Ghare learned counsel contended that present petition filed as Writ Petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable. He has further urged that issue is already framed to cover the controversy. Perusal of issues already framed clearly show that anxiety of petitioner is already taken care of by issue no.2. Words “led down” used in that issue perhaps 2 are the words “let out”. In any case both issues need independent answer and petitioner can demonstrate to trial Court the relevant provisions in this respect. No prejudice is caused to petitioner. Petition is therefore not entertained. JUDGE SVK