IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19583 of 2010 SASHI SHEKHAR PRASAD SHRIVASTAVA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 30.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Pankaj Kumar is a loanee. Petitioner has been shown a guarantor. Apparently, according to the learned counsel, no offence under Sections 420 and 406 of the I.P.C. have been made out. If guarantor is fake, petitioner’s land has been shown given in guarantee. Petitioner has no concerned with the same. Petitioner’s photograph is not there on the record and is denying his signature. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Muzaffarpur Town P.S. Case No. 90 of 2010, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Muzaffarpur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)