: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST.) NO.12747 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12748 OF 2008 Shri Kiran Dayashankar Jani ..Appellant. (Orig.Plff.) Vs. Mumbai Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. ..Respondents. Mr.V.A.Thorat, Senior Counsel Mr.R.S.Yadav and Mr.J.M.Vyas for the Appellant. Mrs.Geeta Joglekar for the Respondents. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 3RD JUNE, 2008 DATED : 3RD JUNE, 2008 DATED : 3RD JUNE, 2008 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : Admit. Heard finally. 2. The dispute is essentially regarding the additional 500 sq. ft. It is not clear as to whether permission was in fact granted for repairs in respect of this additional 500 sq. ft. or not. The order impugned in the suit purports to revoke the permission implying thereby that permission had been granted. 3. In any event, this is an aspect which requires an affidavit to be filed and the Notice of Motion to be heard finally. The effect of the grant of the : 2 : permission also requires to be considered. 4. In the circumstances, the impugned order is set aside. All parties including the Appellant shall maintain status-quo in respect of the suit structure in every respect. The Appellant shall not carry out any alterations of any nature whatsoever without the permission from the concerned authorities. The Notice of Motion to be heard finally by the trial Court. 5. The Appeal from Order and the Civil Application stands disposed of accordingly. 6. All parties are directed to act on an ordinary copy of this order duly authenticated by the Sheristedar/Personal Assistant.