4%“? % T‘ C HON’ELE SHRI RAJEEV UA, CJ. HON’ELE 8 ' SUNIL KUMAR SENHA, Wri: ?etition No. 624T- ef 2M5 . Beekav Enaineerina & Casinas Lt 2?/2' mgr} :ndugtr:a% Area," Bhigai, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) A Registered Commny under the Inian Companies c, rough the Manager (Financ & Accounts} — Shri Pradeep Pa. Beekav Surgicals (A unit of BSBK Pro;ecis Pwltd.) 2m, Ugh :ndustraa: Area, Bhilai Dist. Dur (Cattisgarh) A Registered Company uer the indian Companies Act, hrough Authorized Signatory Shesh Nayan Sharma ?etitioners Sate of Chhaisgarh Through he Secrery, Mrnietry of Envérenment & Urban Deveopmen, State of Chhattisgarh Me ataya — Ratpur. Municipal Corporation — Bhiiai, Distt. Burg (Chhatttegarh) 'i’hreugh the Commissioner i p tth 3 The i3roperty Tax Officer, Municpai Carcration (Chhaisgar) — Bhilai, Distt. Burg Present : Shri ivianoj Paranjpe and Shri 'V‘ikram Dixit, counsei for the petitions. Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Additional Advocate Genei for the State I reseende No. t. None for respondens No. 2 8: 3. t HHGH COURT OF CHHATTISfyARH AT BILAS?UR DIVI$i0N EENCH ORI\i\fi: GPT H 'n J 1 t d s d At th e l M t t g hh nd t ar VERSUS t tt t ta it n r Resnondents Writ ?etition under Articie 226L227 of Constitution 0f indie er ra n ORDER (5th May; 21m) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gunta. CJ. Shri Kishore Bhaduri, learned Additional Advocate General referring to para 5 of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent No.1 submits that the petitioners’ challenge in the writ petition to the increase of the rate of property tax from 10% to 20% is quite vague as grounds of, such challenge have not been spelt out anywhere in the writ petition. 2. Shri Manoi Paranjpe and Shri Vikram Dixit, learned counsel for the petitioners, in view of the above objection of learned Additionai AdvocateGeneral and the fact that the petitioners could not file any rejoinder to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent No.1 so far, seek permission to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty of filing another writ petition incorporating the specific and detailed grounds of challenge to the increase in the rate of property tax from 10% to 20%. 3. Permission granted. 4. With the above liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Certified copy of the order as per rules. Sgt/- Sd/-. Chief Justice Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge subbu