IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M.No.M-16210 of 2009 Date of Decision: 6.7.2009 Meena and another ..Petitioners. Vs. State of Punjab ..Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present : Mr.G.S.Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Veneet Sharma, Advocate for the complainant. Mr.Ranbir Singh Rawat, AAG Punjab for the respondent-State. RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. The petitioners are Nanad and Nandoi of the complainant. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have joined investigation as per order passed by this Court dated 11.6.2009. This fact is accepted by the counsel for the State on instructions received from Manjit Singh ASI. He further submits that recovery of Rs.50,000/- is to be effected. In response thereto, counsel for the petitioners submits that alleged amount of Rs.50,000/- which has not been given as dowry but for the purpose of purchasing cable connections. Be that as it may, order dated 11.6.2009 is made absolute. The petitioners shall keep on joining investigation as and when called for. They shall also abide by the provisions of Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petition is disposed of. (Rakesh Kumar Jain) 6.7.2009 Judge Meenu