IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 11TH DECEMBER 2008 / 20TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 36450 of 2008(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M.VALSALA DEVI, AGED 62 YEARS, WIFE OF T.K. GOPALAKRISHNA PILLAI, RES. AT THUNDIL, MANAGER, MMHSS UPPOOD, EAST KALLADA P.O., KOLLAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.JOHN JOSEPH VETTIKAD SRI.C.JOSEPH JOHNY RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION KOLLAM. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KOLLAM 4. SRI. SREEJU C.J., FTM MMHSS, UPPOOD, KOLLAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. A.J. VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.36450/2008 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of December, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner is the Manager of an aided school. By Ext.P1 order, the 4th respondent was appointed as Full Time Menial in the promotion vacancy. Approval was declined by Ext.P2 order on the ground that a protected hand was not appointed. Appeal was rejected by the DDE as per Ext.P3. Aggrieved by these proceedings, Ext.P4 revision has been filed by the petitioner before the first respondent. In this writ petition what the petitioner seeks is an early disposal of Ext.P4 revision filed invoking the power of the first respondent under Rule 92 of Chapter XIV-A KER. Having regard to the above factual position, I direct the first respondent to consider Ext.P4 revision filed by the petitioner, with notice to her and pass orders thereon as WP(c).No.36450/08 2 expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 3 months from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the Ist respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE vi. WP(c).No.36450/08 3