1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICMTURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. LPA No. 260 of 07 Lokmanya & anr v. Shri Kishore Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Dr Anjan De, Adv for appellants Mr M.B. Agasti, Adv for respondent Coram: A.P. Deshpande and R.C. Chavan, JJ Dated : 11th January 2008 In an appeal preferred by the respondent before the University and College Tribunal, an application for amendment of memo of appeal was moved after a period of two years. The same came to be granted by the Tribunal. Aggrieved thereby, Writ Petition No. 891 of 2007 was carried calling in question correctness of the order. Said writ petition has been dismissed by the learned single Judge and hence, this Letters Patent Appeal. Learned counsel for appellant has made two submissions, viz. (1). the amendment is barred by limitation and (2). the prayer for conversion of post from part-time to full-time is itself beyond the scope of 2 Section 59 of the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994. Both these submissions are touching the merit of the amendment. In the present appeal, we are concerned only with the question as to whether the Courts below are justified in granting the amendment. The amendment permitted does not need to be interfered with. It is obvious that it shall be open for the appellant to raise all the contentions touching the merits of the amendment by filing reply to the amended memo. There is no merit in the appeal and hence, it is dismissed. Judge. Judge. hsj