IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-14671 of 2011 Date of Decision: September 06, 2011 Kulwinder Singh & another .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & another .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Siddarath Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. N.S. Diwana, Advocate, for respondent No.2. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. prays for quashing FIR No.37 dated 24.4.2011 (Annexure P-1) under Section 379 IPC registered with Police Station, Sandaur, District Sangrur, on the basis of compromise, Annexure P-2. 2. Vide order dated 12.5.2011, the Illaqa Magistrate was directed to record the statement of the parties. Report dated Crl. Misc. No. M-14671 of 2011 [2] 6.6.2011 has been received from the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Malerkotla, from which it is made out that the complainant gave the statement that accused is to pay a sum of ` 3,40,000/- after quashing of FIR. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent-complainant states that the money, as undertaken to be paid by the petitioners, has been paid to the complainant and therefore, the complainant does not oppose the quashing of FIR and consequent proceedings. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent-State contends that because the parties have entered into a compromise, the petition for quashing of FIR is not opposed. 5. Considering the nature of offence and the fact that rights of the complainant have been satisfied, this petition is allowed. FIR No.37 dated 24.4.2011 (Annexure P-1) under Section 379 IPC registered with Police Station, Sandaur, District Sangrur and consequent proceedings are hereby quashed. (AJAI LAMBA) September 06, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?