IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5485 OF 2009 Sandeep K. Vakharia ... Petitioner Vs 1. Union of India & 4 ors. ... Respondents Ms. Shilpa Kapil for the petitioner. Mr. R.G. Bhatt for the respondents. CORAM: S.B. MHASE & R.M. SAVANT, JJ. DATED : 11TH AUGUST, 2009. P.C.: 1. Heard both sides. 2. The petitioner has requested the respondents to supply the petitioner with the order of the Commissioner of Customs dated 10th September, 2007 in File No.S/26 Misc-07/07 Gr I alongwith copies of the relevant note sheets in the said file pertaining to provisional assessment/release of the consignment covered in B/E.No.668697 dated 23/02/2007 and No.668896 dated 24/02/2007 the same has been demanded by the Petitioner under the Right to Information Act. The said prayer has been rejected by the Information Officer and, on appeal, by the first appellate authority and thereafter by the second appellate authority for the reasons mentioned in the respective orders. The respondents have produced on record the final order of assessment which has been passed on 31st March, 2009. As against the said final order of assessment, an appeal can be preferred by the petitioner. 3. So far as the demand of the petitioner in respect of the provisional assessment order is concerned, what we find is that the said provisional order has already been communicated to the Petitioner as the provisional assessment is by way of an endorsement on the bill of lading which is at pages 26 and 27 of the paper-book. Insofar as the note-sheets are concerned, since the appellate authorities have already considered it and rejected the same for valid reasons, we do not find any reason to interfere with the decision of the Information Officers and both the appellate authorities under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Petition is, accordingly, rejected. (R.M. SAVANT, J.) (S.B. MHASE, J.)