IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12468 of 2008 1. RAJ DEO SINGH S/O BHANU PRASAD SINGH 2. SINTU KUMAR SINGH @ SANTU KUMAR SINGH SON OF RAJ DEO SINGH --- PETITIONERS Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. SHIV DAYAL SINGH SON OF RAM NAGINA SINGH ---OPP. PARTIES. For the petitioners: Mr. Amarnath Jha, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay,APP ----------- 02 29.10.2010 Order under fire is dated 22.08.2007 passed by learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Hazipur ( Vaishali) in Tr. No. 2746 of 2007, Complaint case no. 2817 of 2006 whereby on a perusal of the materials brought on record cognizance has been taken under Sections 420 and 406 of the Penal Code against two of the accuseds cited in the complaint. Learned Magistrate did not find sufficient materials against other accused persons and accordingly they were let off. I have perused the order impugned. It appears therefrom that learned Magistrate applied his mind to the facts and circumstances of the case and has found that there is prima facie case justifying trial so far as only two accused persons who are petitioners. This order was passed on 22.08.2007. Learned counsel for the petitioners is not in a position to state about the current position of the case. Having regard to the materials on record and after perusal of the impugned order, this Court is satisfied that the order impugned does not call for any interference. 2 However, this order shall not preclude the petitioners from raising/agitating the grievance(s) at the appropriate stage of the proceeding. The application is dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)