1 Amk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 145 OF 2009 Nitin Suryakant Chauhan ... Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra & anr. ... Respondents Mr. Raja Thakare i/b A.M. Chimalkar/ R.P. Yadav for the applicant. Mr. A.S. Shitole APP for the respondent State. Mr. Kishore Bhatia for respondent No.2. CORAM : MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. Dated :- 17th September, 2009. PC : 01. Both the parties and their counsel are present. They tender Consent Terms duly signed by them and their respective counsel. In view of the Consent Terms the parties have settled their financial claim. The order of conviction passed by the learned Magistrate, which is confirmed in Appeal Nos. 166/07 and 231/08 is set aside and quashed. In view of the Consent Terms these revision applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 2 02. The learned counsel appearing for both the parties point out that besides the orders in appeals, which are under challenge before this Court, other two appeals i.e. Appeal Nos. 166/07 and 231/08 are yet pending in the file of learned Sessions Judge, Sewree. The learned Sessions Judge to take note of the Consent Terms filed in these two Revisions. (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) 3