THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.26160 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner was selected as agency to run an Urban Health Centre at B.C. Colony, Narayanpet, Mahaboobnagar on 02.03.2010. The contract is for a period of one year. However, it can be extended for another year, in case the performance of the petitioner is assessed as ‘A’ Grade. Vide proceedings, dated 18.08.2011, the District Collector-cum-Chairman/President, District Health Society, respondent No.2 herein, terminated the contract of the petitioner on the ground that his performance was assessed to be as ‘C’ Grade. The petitioner challenges the said order. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Medical Health and Family Welfare. Even from a perusal of the contract entered into between the petitioner and respondent No.2, it is evident that the contract can be renewed if only the petitioner has secured ‘A’ Grade. If ‘B’ Grade is awarded, the initial renewal is for a period of three months and in the subsequent assessment, if ‘A’ Grade is awarded, the renewal can be for the remaining 9 months also. If ‘C’ Grade is awarded for the performance of the initial period of one year, the question of renewal does not arise. In the instant case, the petitioner was awarded the ‘C’ Grade. Therefore, respondent No.2 cannot be expected to renew the contract. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is absolutely no basis or criterion for respondent No.2 in the context of assessment of performance or award of Grades. This is not the forum to decide, much less the stage. Once the petitioner had accepted for the conditions in the order of appointment, he cannot challenge some of the conditions after expiry of substantive period. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:27.09.2011. kdl