^\^ IN THE HON'BLE HI6H COl/RT OF CHHATTISG^RH-^T BILASPUR(G.6.) W.P. (S)NO f>^& /2010 PETETIONER -^ ^.^'^ y^s^^""' ..<»* ,Ai!^li.^'l'°- \ _^'*' ^^^^>-A"' ^^^'. ^ VERSUS Kunj Bihari Dixit S/o Shri RameshwQr Prasad Dixit, Aged about 43 years, Block Education Officer ; Pendra, Distt. Bilaspur (c.e.) RESPONDENTS 1. Stafeof Chhattisgdrh Through Secr-efary, Tr'ihal Welfare &epartment D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.) 2. Gommissioner Trible Walfare Depdrtineftt, RaipUF (C.6.) 3. .AssistQntGoi'nmisioner Tribal Welfare Depdrtment B;ildspur(£.6.), , '4. Joint Drrector/Tr'easur'y AceoUtrt' i&lPensipn Bjrldspi.fr E>istt. Bilaspuri WRirPET'ItION U/Al^6^2^^F?TWE^hil^^^ ©Effl^lA fhg ^- \. •ti ^^ H!GH_COURT_OF CHHATTISGARH ; BILASPUR WRIT PETITION LS) N0.678 OF 2010 PETITI Versus RESPONDENTS attis pA/rit Petition under Articte 226/227 of the Sinale Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish Present:- Shri K.S. Pawar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER(ORAU (Passed on this 15th day of Februar/, 2010) 1) With the consent of learned counset appearing for the partles the petition is heard finaily. 2) By this petition, the petitioner seeks a di respondents to pay two advance. increments from the date of passing Of B.Ed examination, on his entering Intoservice. Learned counsel appearing issue involved in the present for the pet case ss no submits that the ier res integra as the same has been considered and decided by the Supreme Court in Astis Saxena v. Stats ofM.P. & Ore. as we!! as by this Court in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwa] v. Municipal CoiporaSon, Durg and anoths!2 and Gopesh Kumar Venna v. The State Govt.ofChhalSsgarhandanother^. | r 2009^11) MPJR(SC5 59 22006(ir)MPJR-CG96 3WP(S)No.4130o^20Q5 -Hil il i31 Gowri 4) Learned counsel further submits that the instant petition i; square!y covered petitioner may be p his case in the i the deeision as aforestated. Thus, the litted to make a representation to declde of aforestated decisions, subject to veriTication of the facts. 5) Leamed counsel appearing for the State submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same wi!l be considered and decided, In accordance with iaw and in the iight of the decisions of the S.upreme Court in Asha Saxena (supra) as weii as thls Court in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj (sypra) and Gopesh Kumar Verma (supra), within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt ofthe representation. 6) In viaw of foregoing, according to the leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in thss petition Tor 7) Accordingly, the writ petition is dispqsed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge