In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-30943 of 2011 Date of Decision: November 18, 2011 Ramanand ---Petitioner versus Shimla Devi and another ---Respondents Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH *** Present: Mr. P.R.Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner None for respondent No. 1 Mr. Sidharth Sarup, DAG, Haryana for respondent No. 2 *** Gurdev Singh, J. The complainant, who has been impleaded as respondent No. 1, has not come present in spite of service. Heard. The petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in a private Complaint No. 185 dated 8.9.2008, filed against him by the complainant and which is pending before Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rewari. He has been summoned to stand his trial for the offences under Sections 323, 406, 498-A and 506 IPC. The interim anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner, vide order dated 13.10.2011, in view of the submissions made by his counsel Crl. Misc. No. M-30943 of 2011(O&M) -2- and which are incorporated in that order. The complainant has not come present to contest the petition. The order dated 13.10.2011 is hereby made absolute subject to the following conditions:- (i)He shall not offer any threat, promise or inducement to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing the same to the Investigating Officer/Court; and (ii)He shall not leave the limits of this country without prior permission of the Court. (GURDEV SINGH) JUDGE November 18, 2011 PARAMJIT