IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13417 of 2011 Gafar Mansuri, S/O-Late Gani Mohammad Mansuri Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03 06.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 27.09.2010 in a case registered under Section 412 of the Indian Penal Code in the year 2005. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the alleged recovery has been made in absence of the petitioner and moreover, the household articles of the petitioner were seized by the informant and in course of investigation, the prosecution could not succeed to establish that the seized articles were of stolen property. Although, the impugned order as well as first information report reveal that petitioner carries criminal antecedent but Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahana at Motihari in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No. 69 of 2005 subject to condition that one of the sureties must be close relative of the petitioner and holder of landed property. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)