IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.16042 of 2005 Between: K.Khamarunnisa Begum, w/o Sri K.Mohammad Osman Sab, r/o D.No.221/11, Jamkhanwadi Street, Adoni-518 301. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Joint Collector, Kurnool-cum-Special Officer, For Adoni municipality, Adoni, Kurnool District. 2 Commissioner, Adoni Municipality, Adoni, Kurnool District. 3 Sri K.Ramkishan, s/o Sri Sathaiah, Commissioner, Adoni Municipality, Adoni, Kurnool District. 4 The District Collector, Kurnool. 5 The Commissioner and Director of Municipal Administration, Hyderabad. 6 The Regional Director-cum-Appellate Commissioner, Ananthapur. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus- i) declaring the action of the respondents in cancelling the petitioners' licence under Roc.No.203/05/A-1 dated 16-07-2005 without adjusting the petitioner's deposit amount and the amounts due to the petitioner on account of wrongful loss caused by the respondents 1 to 3 and without notice or opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and violative of articles 14, 19 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and the principles of natural justice; (ii) directing the respondents to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation for adjustment/remission on account of loss caused by the Court orders in W.P.No.5944 of 2005 and consequent default by the traders and other reasons, as per Rules; iii) directing the respondents to take all steps for recovery of amount due from the defaulting traders as per Sections 378 to 380 and Section 344 of the A.P.Municipalities Act and the Revenue Recovery Act; iv) directing the respondents not to cancel the licence of the petitioner in future without disposing of the petitioner's representation for waiver, adjustment or remission, in accordance with law; and v) passing such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circusmtances of the case and in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.V.DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN. & URBAN DEV. The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.16042 of 2005 ORDER: As the matter relates to collection of market fee for the year 2005-06, the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 14-03-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RS}