'-••^a^,- ^Q-:-^yS:^^.Sy.^y < THE HIGH COURT OFJUDICATURE AT JABALPUR ^::.p^ vm f.P. NC^'5'^3/99 PETITIOENR: Vijay Kumar Khedia S/o. Late Shri Chunni lal Kedia aged 47 years, partner M/s. Rani Sati Granite Company, a partnership firm, r/o. • Manendragarh, Disfrict. Korea. 2. Shyamlal Agrawal S/o.Ramkumar Agrawal aged about 50 yeare, partnerMfe. SlTyamlalAgrawal,; through Vijay Kf Kedia, holder o'f power of attomey, r/o. '~~~—- Manehdragarh,District. Korea. mM VERSUS RESPONDENTS Kttmar ^•^-^^, y/<rr ^^. '&s.»&^^ p^? ^ 1. State of MP, through .-• Secretaiy, Deptt. of Water Resource, s Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal 2. Engineer In Chief ' Water Resource Deptt. MP. Bhopal, M.P. 3. ChtefEngineerHusdeo BangorroJect,Waier Resourc&Oeptt. Bilaspur(MP). 4. Suprintending Englneer. Minjmata Bango Dam Circle, Kharsla, Dlstr. —^.-BE Ut{MPl*_____J_ iBfl^a;fe:';no. S ^ 'tt/'®.sna,Esa W^ 22S OF THE CONSTETUTION OF i^- ur ?v WU5_AHD_ FQR^OTHER Ml I/! &^_ri^idN ? 4^ ^ TVK,'^"w!Ti9t' ^wfi ff-if^—i-.-""U - ONER N0.3 i\ ^"-^:! ,l^.ITIQNER N0.5 '.TITIONER N0.6 PETITIONER N0.7 Ra gopal Khedia, s/o iate Chunallal Khedia. Krislma Kumar Khedia, s/o Ran> Gopal ^hedia. Vijay Kuaiar Khedia, s/o lats Shri Chunnilal Khedia Arun Kuraar Todi, s/o late Gopal Todi ( All residsnt of Manendra Garh, District Koria.M.P.) Jaiprakash Agrawal, s/o Shri Rara Kumar Agrawai, resiaent of TeH'.and Dlstt.Raigarh. PSTITIONSR N0.8 PETITIONER N0.9 PETITIOSER N0.10. PETITIONSR N0.11. PSTITIONSR NO.ia Vinod Kuraar Agrawal s/o shri Ram Kumar Agrawal. Qopal Agrawal s/b Snrl Ram Kuraar Agrawal. Smt. Blna Dsvi a w/o Shri Rara Ku-iiar Agrawal, •Srat.Suraitra Devi. w/o Shri Jal prakash Agrawal. .. Srat. Ssroj Devi w/o Naresh Kumar Agrawal. SBTITIONER N0.14, PETITIOITERNO.IB.' T Smt.Sial-ita Devi,. »i/o Subhash Agrawal. Subhash Agrawal, s/o Ram Kumar Agrawal. (AII resident of Raigarh, DXstt, Raigarh, M.P.) " ^•^dfctM.WIS^lh^-u.i y *^^u •^y"^-' y :t \f^' ^\ ^ .c~ <,''~^' •; ^M^. "s:^ y iv 'i, M •<', ^' : . - . • „ ' yRBSpONDENT i<Q»S^ ''ResgpiaKUt no.5 ('l/s.Sharaa Project <?r.tvAt;s L imited,Hyderabad, Through its Of.£Aaer-jln-c;faarge in tha mafcter of sonstruetion bf A3ue Ducfc st R.D.3420 -M ^ld_R.^Q^_Sa=Q,---^-«-e^-^harsl,a-.,BranGn''- Cana'l,Khai'si3., C/o iixecutlve Bngineer, Hasdeo Ggnal Dlyis.I.on no.5»Kharsi.a, D.lstrlct aaig;irh,M.p. " lues IT RIi fl 3=^" N0. 3583 OF 191 Vijay Kumar KJiedle & Others Versus ^ ^ WRiT PETIT! State of M.P. & Others ER ART1CLE 226 OF THE CONSTiTUTI lon'ble Mr. Satish K. Aanlhotri. J, Shri Ashisli Shrivastava; Advocate for the petitioners Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. (Passed on 30:" day of September, 2010) By this petition, the petitioner is seeking a directlon restraining thi respondents from proceedlna with the finalizatlon of tender notice pursuant to the NiT dated 12.4.1999. Today, this matter does not suri/ive, as issue of tender notice and finalization of tender documents cannot wait for such a lona Deriod. Thus, this petition has become infructuous. Learned counsel sppearing for the parties do not controvert the aboye stated facts. 3. in view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed, as having become infructuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge