AB 2433/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE H. BARUAH Heard Mr. B D Konwar, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. K Muni r, learned Addl. P.P. representing the State. The petitioners have approached this court apprehending their arrest in connecti on with Jogighopa Police Station Case No. 110 of 2011 filed under section 120(B) /326/307/384 IPC to provide them pre-arrest bail in view of the facts and ground s contended in the petition. It is submitted by Mr. Konwar that first informant Mr. Jabed Ali, due to politic al rivalry has falsely filed the First Information Report alleging assault on hi s father by them on the relevant day and time. In view of the allegations so bro ught in, we are constrained to peruse the materials available in the case diary. From meticulous examination of the materials we find that the informant was exa mined on 8.07.2011 by the concerned Investigating Officer whose statement primar ily speaks about the involvement of the petitioners herein but on further scruti ny of the materials available in the CD it appears to this court that on 20th Au gust, 2011, a note was made by the concerned I.O. indicating therein that till d ate he was unable to collect any material showing complicity of any person in co nnection with the case. The statement recorded under section 161 of the Cr.P.C. appears to be recorded on earlier point of time than the date of the note. On th e other hand, it also appears from the materials on record that petitioner No. 3 Jamini Kanta Ray implicated themselves as the assailants of the father of the f irst informant Jabed Ali and they divulged their involvement in the alleged offe nce to the first informant Jabed Ali. Materials so far collected by the petition er cannot entail the rejection of the bail application made under section 438 Cr .P.C. Taking note of all matters in its entirety and the submissions advanced by learn ed counsel for the parties, this petition stands allowed. The petitioners, namely, Sri Akram Ali Bhutto, Sri Deepak Kumar Das and Sri Jami ni Kanta Ray are provided with interim bail. In the event of their arrest, in co nnection with the above case, they shall be released on bail for Rs. 15,000/- ea ch with one surety of the like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the arrest ing authority. This bail application accordingly stands disposed of.