^^L- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUREATBJLASPJJR CHHATTISGARH w-P.(S) No. /223/<P/-2606- PETITIONER .Y%? ,j^K^^v y'J /4t-' Ashiwani Kumar Jha, S/o. Late Shri J.R. Nishad, aged about 44 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary Schoot Fareednagar, Bhilai, Distt.- Durg (C.G.) .^";^ fy RESPONDENTS VERSUS ^' ^-o JC.Of1 o^ ^ o.'^A ^io**- \v & ST^ /^1. State of Chhattisgrh, Through - The Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) . 2. The Director, Public Instruction Department, Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur / 3. District Education Officer, Durg, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Durg Distt. - Durg (C.G.), / IB:i WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2^6^27-'OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HISH COURT OF CHHATHSSARH AT BILASWR W. P.fSl .1223 of 2007 Ashiwoni Kumar Jha Verais State of Chhatt'isgarh and others SB: Hon'ble r. Justice Satish K.. Agnihotri. J Present: Mr. Vipin Tiwari, Adyocate for ttie petitioner. Mr. SatiA Supta, Deputy 6ovt. Advocate for S-S. OROER (Passed on this 1st Day of March. 2007) 1. The petitioner was dppointed on 1-7-1983 as Assistant Teadier on fixed pay scaie of Rs. 300/-. After completion of two years probation, he was granted regufar pay scate. 2. Leamed counsei appearing for thepetitioner submi'ts that the issue involved in the case is asto whether, thepetitioner is entitted to guiar pay scale w.e.f. the date of initiai appointment or after completion of probation period. 3. T^ie issue involved, herein was considered by the Madhya Pnidesh State Administrative Tribunat, JSbaipur in O.A. No. 2745/89 Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. <& others), wherein it was held that +he similarly situated teachers are entitled to re9utar pay scale w.e.f. 1+ie date of initia! appointment. The matter was taken-up to •ttse Hon'ble Supreme Cour-t in Speciat Leave Petition (Ci'vil) No. 6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon'bte Supreme Court uphotding the decision of the Tribuna! to the effect that the Teachers/Assis+unt Teachers are entitted to regular pay scale from date of initial appointment. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further aibmits that this Court, while considering the some issue in Amaf Sm Ram & others Vs. State of Chhatl-isgarh & others (W.P. (5) No. 4725/ 2006) by order dated 1.9.2006, has gronted regular pay scale w.e.f. of initi 5. Leamed counsel lappearing for the parties jointly submit that this case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Amar Sm Ram & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh <S others (Supra). Amit 6. In v'ww of that this petition is disposed of in the same terms. order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge