1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.09.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P(MD)No.10355 of 2011 M.P.Velraja .. Petitioner Vs. The Tahsildar, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai District. .. Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent herein to issue patta for the land in Survey No.4/2 in Naickanpatti Village, Madurai North Taluk in favour of the petitioner herein based on the order passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai in Ni.Mu.No.843/2008/N dated 21.02.2011 and also by considering the representations made by the petitioner on 13.04.2011 and 03.09.2011 within time stipulated. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Sukumar For Respondent : Mr.TR.Janarthanam Additional Government Pleader. O R D E R This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent herein to issue patta for the land in Survey No.4/2 in Naickanpatti Village, Madurai North Taluk in favour of the petitioner herein based on the order passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai in Ni.Mu.No.843/2008/N dated 21.02.2011 and also by considering the representations made by the petitioner on 13.04.2011 and 03.09.2011 within time stipulated. 2. Heard Mr.B.Sukumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.TR.Janarthanam, learned Additional Government Pleader, who takes notice for the respondent. 3. By consent, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final hearing. 4. The petitioner claims the benefit of mutation of patta based on the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer in Proceedings Ni.Mu.No.843/2008/N dated 21.02.2011. He has made two representations to the Tahsildar on 13.04.2011 and 03.09.2011. Since the representations have not been considered so far, the writ petition has been filed by the petitioner. 5. Without going into the merits of the petitioner's claim, the Tahsildar is directed to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 13.04.2011 and 03.09.2011, after verifying any revision has been filed by the aggrieved party against the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer. Such exercise shall be completed by the authority on its own merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. It is made clear https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 that this Court does not express any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's case and the authority shall consider the same on its own merits. 6. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. No Costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (RTI) / True Copy / Sub Assistant Registrar To The Tahsildar, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai District. +1CC TO MR.B.SUKUMAR, ADVOCATE SR.30854 +1CC TO THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SR : 31127 Ssl SR : 26.09.2011 : 2p/4c W.P(MD)No.10355 of 2011 12.09.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/