[1] DBCWP 1730/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R D.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION (PAROLE) NO. 1730/2009 GOPAL SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. Date: 08.04.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RATHORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI Mr. Nikhilesh Katara, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Alka Bhatnagar, Addl. Govt. Counsel for State. **** By way of this writ petition petitioner Gopal Singh has sought first regular parole for 20 days as he has undergone requisite 1/4th of the sentence awarded to him. The petitioner has been convicted for the offence under Sections 302, 323 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment by the Additional District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track), Kaman, District Bharatpur vide judgment dated 18.08.2004 rendered in Sessions Case No. 23/2004. The application of the petitioner for releasing him on parole has been rejected by the Advisory Committee vide order impugned dated 31.01.2009 on the ground of adverse report given by the Superintendent of Police, Bharatpur, Social Welfare Department and the Jail Authorities. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Govt. Counsel appearing for the State and carefully gone through the order impugned passed by the Advisory committee dated 31.01.2009 as also the report submitted by the [2] DBCWP 1730/2009 Superintendent of Police, Bharatpur, Social Welfare Department and the Jail Authorities. The Superintendent of Police, Bharatpur and the Social Welfare Department as well as the Jail Authorities have not recommended the case of the petitioner to release him on parole as the conduct of the petitioner was found unsatisfactory. It has also been submitted in the report that while undergoing sentence the petitioner absconded from jail. Thus, the conduct of the petitioner has not been found satisfactory by the authorities and, therefore, he has been declined first regular parole for 20 days. Looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case, conduct of the petitioner and the adverse report given by the Superintendent of Police, Bharatpur and the Social Welfare Department as well as the Jail Authorities, we are of the view that the Advisory Committee has rightly refused first regular parole sought by the petitioner and the same requires no interference by this Court. In the result, the writ petition fails and the same is hereby dismissed. (K.S. CHAUDHARI),J. (K.S. RATHORE),J. /KKC/