IN THE "GH COURT OF SIKKIM CIVIL JURISDICTION WP (C) For For No..„...,.......................2.P.....................................of20...11 TEKENDRA SHA"A STATE 0F SIKKIM .& ORS.. AppeHan Petitioner (Advocate (s)) Plespondent (Advocate (s)) Versus AppeHantslS Petitioner (s) Pespondent (s) Ofpefoptry® MR.B.SHARMA,SR.ADVOCATEWITHMR.BHOLAN. SHARMA,MR.BIJAYRAIANDMS.SABITASHARMA MR.J.B.PRADHAN,ADDL.ADVOCATEGENERALWITII MR.KARMATHINLAY,GOVT.AI)VOCATEANDMR.S.K. CHETTRI,ASSTT.GOVT.ADVOCATE Order HON, EMR. (s) with Signature (s) 01.1 .05.11 Present : Mr. a. Sharma, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Bhola N. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J. 8. Pradhan, Addl.Advocate General with Mr. Karma Thinlay Namgyal, Govt. Advocate and Mr. Santosh Kr. Chettri, Asstt.Govt. Advocate for the respondents. *** Heard. Mr. a. Sharma, learned Senior Advocate, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submits that the present work Case No Cud-.?Ci) rfo ' € a Serial No. Order (s) with Signature (s) which is valued at Rs. 15 crores would be executable by a contractor of Grade IA. He further submits that on enquiry from the petitioner, he is informed that he belongs to the category Ilo and not eligible to bid for the contract even if the work was to be re-tendered. As such, Mr. 8. Sharma seeks permission t:o withdraw the Writ Petition. The submission being fair and reasonable and also in accordance with the legal position, the permission sought for is granted and t:he Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. i:-::- 19.05.2011 SGPG. 3/ High Court/ 5000 Nos./ 2.4.2009 071/.