IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 17TH DECEMBER 2009 / 26TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 12140 of 2009(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- DINESAN ASARI T.R. S/O. T.S.REGHU, THUNDATHIL PARAMBIL, SOUTH CHITTOOR, KOCHI-682 027. BY ADV. SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD, OFFICE OF THE COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD, THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. ASSISTANT DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER, COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD, THRISSUR. 3. THE DEVASWOM OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DEVASWOM OFFICER, THEKKEN CHITTOOR SREE KRISHNA SWAMY TEMPLE, SOUTH CHITTOOR, ERNAKULAM. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, ERNAKULAM. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, CHITTOOR, ERNAKULAM. 6. K.N.KRISHNAKUMAR, S/O. NEELAKANTAN NAIR, KOTTARATHIL HOUSE, SOUTH CHITTOOR P.O., KOCHI-682 027. 7. K.K.LALAN, PRESIDENT, TEMPLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE, SREE KRISHNA SWAMI TEMPLE, SOUTH CHITTOOR P.O., KOCHI. 8. K.N.RAVEENDRAN, SECRETARY, TEMPLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE, SREE KRISHNA SWAMI TEMPLE, SOUTH CHITTOOR P.O., KOCHI. ADV. SRI.K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP,SC,COCHIN D.B FOR R1-3 SRI.R.DIVAKARAN FOR R6 SRI.M.S.UNNIKRISHNAN FOR R7 & 8 SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) FOR ADDL.R5. SRI.K.RAVI (PARIYARATH) FOR ADDL.R5. SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.R.LAKSHMINARAYAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMAN & P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JJ. --------------------------------------------------- WP(C) No. 12140 of 2009 --------------------------------------- Dated, this the 17th day of December, 2009 O R D E R P.R. Raman, J. It is submitted by the learned Counsel appearing for the complainant in complaint No. 182, that in the temple premises, there is a water leakage and devotees are put to inconvenience. But the Ombudsman in paragraph 8 has looked into this complaint and observed that this is denied by the Temple Advisory Committee and also by the Devaswom Officer and there is nothing to establish the complaint. In the absence of better evidence, we cannot give special directions in this regard. P.R. RAMAN, JUDGE P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE dnc