1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No.573/2008 (Radheyshyam Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : February 19, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.K.S.Gill, for the petitioner. Mr.J.P.S.Choudhary, Public Prosecutor. Mr.Yuvraj Sonel for Mr.Subhash, for the first informant. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Public Prosecutor for the State and the counsel for the first informant. Perused the order impugned. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that there is a cross-case and in cross-case, the matter was placed before Lok Adalat and in persuasion of the Lok Adalat, the matter has been compromised and by compromise, the complainant party has been acquitted in that case. It is further contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that similarly situated co-accused Smt. Basanti has been granted bail by this Court vide order dt. 14.2.2008. Learned counsel for the first informant submits that in this case, the complainant has no objection if the bail is granted to the petitioner since the parties have compromised the matter. 2 Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the oral arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Radheyshyam s/o Mohan Lal be released on bail in FIR No.02/2008, P.S. Mundwa provided he furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-