1 wp2633.05.sxw ssm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2633 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1055 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2633 OF 2005 Kazi Sayyed Azizzuddin Walad Allauddin & Ors. ....Petitioners. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. Y.H. Muchhala, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sagheer A. Khan, Mr. Javed Patel, Mr. Vaibhav Nagvekar and Mr. Hussain Kazi i/by Mr. Sagheer A. Khan for the Petitioners. Mr. C.R. Sonawane, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1,3 and 4. Mr. R.M. Momin for Respondent No.2. CORAM :- D.K DESHMUKH AND ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE :- 5 OCTOBER, 2011. P.C. :- It is common ground that even according to the Petitioners the only prayer clause that may survive for consideration after our Judgment in Writ Petition No. 2906 of 2004 and other connected 2 wp2633.05.sxw ssm matters dated 21 September, 2011, is prayer clause (a) but by that prayer clause order dated 3 March 2005 is challenged. Perusal of that order shows that by that order Petitioner No.2 has been removed from the post of de facto Mutawalli and Respondent No. 6 was appointed in his place for a period of one year. 2 Now, the position is that Petitioner No.2 is no more and Respondent No. 6 was appointed only for a period of one year from 3 March 2005 and that period of one year is already over. Therefore, nothing survives to be considered even in relation to prayer clause (a). 3 So far as the relief claimed by prayer clause (b-1) is concerned, the Petitioners are granted liberty to file a fresh Petition, if so advised. 4 The Petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 5 Civil Application No. 1055 of 2008 is also disposed of. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)