IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37701 of 2009 BABU RAM YADAV S/O AGAM LAL YADAV VILL. JHARWA, P.S. NAUHATTA, DISTT. SAHARSA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 26.11.2009 Heard both sides. Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted under Section 414 of Indian Penal Code and diverse sections of Arms Act. It appears that one looted/stolen motorcycle was found kept in the „angan‟ of the petitioner covered with “bhusa” which was accordingly seized in presence of witnesses. The seizure witnesses have supported the prosecution case. It appears that the petitioner has disputed the fact that the house belong to him. It is the case of the petitioner that the said house, in fact, belong to his brother. It is next contended that the petitioner has absolutely clean record/antecedent. Be that as it may, having regard to the allegations and materials available on record, this court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. His prayer is, accordingly, dismissed. Let the petitioner surrender in the court below and apply for regular bail which shall be considered on its own merit uninfluenced by the present order. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )