1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 37 OF 2009 Pramod Ramesh Bhogate ).. Petitioner versus Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited and another ).. Respondents Mr. Uday P. Warunjikar for the Petitioner. Ms. S.I. Shah for Respondent No.1. Mr. A.M. Sethna with Mr. Rajinder Kumar for Respondent No.2. CORAM : ANIL R. DAVE, C.J. AND S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 15TH APRIL 2010 P.C. In this Public Interest Litigation, the Petitioner has made a grievance that Respondent No.1 Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited is charging more amount than what it should from consumers like him when they use internet facility. 2. In our opinion, this appears to be a personal grievance of the Petitioner which can be ventilated before Respondent No.1 and we are sure that if a representation is made, Respondent No.1 shall look into it 2 and do the needful and give appropriate reply to the Petitioner. If the Petitioner is aggrieved by the reply, it would be open to the Petitioner to take appropriate legal action in the matter. 3. In view of the above, the Petition stands disposed of accordingly. CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.