IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 19TH MARCH 2010 / 28TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 15843 of 2009(A) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- N.K. SASIDHARAN, S/O.KUTTAPPAN, AGED 51 YEARS, NALAOTHUKUMVEETTIL, AMBATTUKAVU DESOM, THAIKKATTUKARA DESOM, ALUVA WEST VILLAGE, ALUVA TALUK. BY ADV. MR.C.P.PEETHAMBARAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE REVENUE RECOVERY TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY TAHSILDAR'S OFFICE, TALUK OFFICE COMPLEX,COLLEGE P.O., ERNAKULAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM. 3. MRS.ELIZEBATH THOMAS, AYAMVILAYIL, KARUVATTA P.O., ADOOR. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.K.P. PRADEEP. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.15843 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of March, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner states that he had purchased an item of property in a court sale. That property is involved in a revenue sale. It is the plea of the petitioner that the revenue sale has been knocked down for a very low amount and that he is prepared to pay amounts much above the amount at which the revenue sale has been knocked down. In opposition, there is the plea that the court proceedings, including the sale in favour of the writ petitioner, were fraudulent and collusive. Today, by separate judgment, W.P(C).5032/09 filed by the auction purchaser in the revenue sale has been disposed of. Directions have been issued in that judgment to consider the matter in the light of what is stated therein. I deem it appropriate to relegate the petitioner herein also to be heard in those proceedings. Hence, it is directed that the petitioner's contentions would also be considered while the matter is taken up following the WPC.15843/09 2 judgment in W.P(C).5032/09. It is clarified that all issues on merits are left open. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.23/03.