Crl. Misc. Nos. M-294 and M-2859 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-294 of 2011 Date of decision:- 28.02.2011 Inder ....Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana ....Respondent Crl. Misc. No. M-2859 of 2011 Rohtas ....Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana ....Respondent. ****** Present:- Mr. A.P. Setia, Advocate, for the petitioner (In CRM No. M-294 of 2011). Mr. U.K. Agnihotri, Advocate, for the petitioner (In CRM No. M-2859 of 2011). Mr. Harmeet Singh Deol, Addl. AG, Haryana. S.S.SARON, J. (ORAL) Heard counsel for the parties. This order will dispose of Criminal Misc. No. M-294 of 2011 filed by Inder son of Zile Singh and Criminal Misc. No. M- 2859 of 2011 filed by Rohtas son of Zile Singh seeking regular bail in a case registered against them on 27.04.2010 for the offences under Sections 148, 149, 323, 325, 302, 506 IPC, at Police Station Rai, District Sonepat. The FIR has been registered on the basis of Crl. Misc. Nos. M-294 and M-2859 of 2011 2 statement of complainant Krishan with regard to the incident that occurred on 26.04.2010 at 10 P.M. Inder and Rohtas (petitioners in the respective petitions) had come in the street having lathis/dandas in their hands alongwith their brothers Satish, Rajbir, Raju, Zile Singh and Dhola (non-petitioners). Raju son of Dharma gave a lathi blow, which hit on the left side of the head of Krishan, followed by two other lathi blows. Then, Dhola son of Premdin gave a lathi blow, which hit his left arm and Satish son of Zile Singh gave a danda blow on the head of the complainant Krishan. The petitioners are not attributed any role. On the noise raised by Krishan (complainant), others including Ram Dhari, Ramdhan, brothers of the complainant and his nephew Mukesh came at the spot. They also got injuries. The FIR was initially registered for the offences under Sections 148, 149, 323 and 506 IPC. The petitioners were granted bail by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sonepat on 30.04.2010. On 31.05.2010 police recorded statement of Ramdhan, who later died. In his statement Ram Dhan had stated that Rohtas gave a lathi blow on the head of his nephew Mukesh and Inder gave a danda blow on his chest. It was on account of the death of Ramdhan that the offence under Section 302 IPC was added. The petitioners, it is stated, are not attributed any injury on the person of deceased Ramdhan. Mukesh, in his statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. on 04.05.2010, does not state that the petitioners Inder or Rohtas had caused any injury to him. In any case, the injuries on the head and chest of Mukesh are simple in nature. Crl. Misc. Nos. M-294 and M-2859 of 2011 3 In these circumstances, both the respective petitioners on their furnishing personal bonds and surety each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sonepat, shall be admitted to bail. Criminal Misc. petitions are, accordingly, disposed of. (S.S.SARON) 28th of February, 2011 JUDGE ajp