@ lngle Bench IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NoW’W/zou / Prabhash Kumar Joshi S/o Shri Bisanu Ram Joshi aged about 43 years, Upper Division Teacher Govt. Higher Secondary School Bahatrai (Middle Depot.) Block-Bilha, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS PETITI‘ONER RESPONDENTS 1/./State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary School Education Department, D.K.S. /Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The District Education Officer, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3<.’/ The Principal, Govt. Higher Secondary School Bahatrai Block—Bilha, District— //’Bilaspur (C.G.) The Joint Director, Treasury, accounts, pension, Bilaspur District-Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA S @ $B ' Hon’bie Shri Manindra Mo 69-1 2-2011 Shri AnilMourya, counsei for the petitioner. Shri-NNaha Roy, Panei Lawyer for the State. Heard. Learned counsei appear entitle‘a'tt‘c‘rbenefrt of two adva D.Ed. examination during serv invoived in the present petition finaiiy decided by the‘Hon’ble S‘tate of MP. & Ors., 2009 (iii judgment besides many others, petition with iiberty to make rep aii his grievances. Counset fo competent authority to decide th Learned counsei for the by the petitioner, shaii be deci Accordingiy, the petition i However, if the petitioner make: of receipt of copy of this order within a further period of two mc iaw. . .aaapii , (rims-m adiagmeamm‘na ~—2/2011—i,so,0004 1an Shrivastava, J. for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is e increments on account of he having passed at his own cost. it is submitted that the issue s no ionger res integra and the same has been upreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena vs. MPJR (SC) 59. He submits that in view of this the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this sentation before the concerned authority, raising the petitioner aiso craves for a direction to the said representation as expeditiousiy as possibie. tate also assures that representation if any made ‘ in accordance with law, as eariy as possibie. s dismissed as withdrawn with iiberty as aforesaid. s a representation within one month from the date ’. the competent authority shaii decide the same nths from the date of its receipt in accordance with Sd/~ ‘ Manindra Mohan Shrivastaya Judge i i d g m . , —