IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.4856 of 2009 Decided on : 27.08.2009 Adesh Saini ... Petitioner versus Haryana Wakf Board ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. Munish Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner. 1.Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed against the order dated 31.07.2009 whereby the evidence of the petitioner (defendant in suit) has been closed on the ground that no evidence had been led despite three opportunities had been awarded. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the case is fixed for 04.09.2009 for rebuttal evidence and in case the petitioner is permitted he would lead his entire evidence on the said date on his own responsibility. In the interest of justice, in this matter the petitioner is allowed to lead his entire evidence on his own responsibility on the date fixed viz 04.09.2009. Consequently this petition is disposed of. August 27, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE