g01C» IN THB HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR W.P. fS) No. ^t^-S /2011 6 PETITIONBR: t,%F"/^> ^- '^L. '••• p/" ^\^: ^k^^/ '\^97&^y '-->.»,«.,«--^' Hari Diwan Rodge S/o Shri Madho Ram. Rodge Aged about 55 years Occupation -Rural Agriculture Extension Officer Office of Senior Agriculture Extension Officer Bijapur Dist-Bijapur (C.G.) VBRSUS RBSPONDENTS: ,-\ 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through, Secretary , Department of Agriculture, ^/,,{y ^\¥ .^%yA> ^^>7/v '^/^ y:^. ^»~A' -f' jS.'-C' {y^'' t./ ^" Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, RaipurfC.G.) 2. Collector , Bijapur Dist-Bijapur (C.G.) 3. Deputy Director, Agriculture, Bijapur Dist -Bijapur (C.G.) w—^- ^ WRJT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 Of • ..1 T^ CONSTZTUTION 6F INDIA "^\ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION CS) No. 5125 of2011 Hari Diwan Rodge VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OFJ1IE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aenihotri, J. Present: Ms. Deepali Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govemment Advocate for the State/respondents. QRDER CQRALJ (Passed on 5th day ofSeptember, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 18.11.2009 (Annexure P/l), the petitioner, working as Rural Agriculture Extension Officer has been transferred from the office of Senior Agriculture Extension Officer, Bijapur to the office of Deputy Director, Agriculture, Durg, on his own request. However, the petitioner has not yet been relieved to join the new place of posting. Learned counsel submits that once the order of transfer has been passed, it is for the Govemment to ensure that it is complied with immediately. Leamed counsel relies on a decision of the Supreme Court in Sreedam Chandra Ghosh v. State of Assam & others , in support ofher contention that ifthe order is not complied with, a direction can be issued for enforcement thereof. 2. Shri Sao, leamed Government Advocate appearing for the State submits that that ifthe transfer order dated 18.11.2009 (Annexure P/l) is still in existence and has not been complied with, appropriate steps would be taken to comply with the order. 3. Ifthe aforesaid transfer order is still in existence, the Government is under an obligation to comply with the same at once. It is accordingly directed that the transfer order shall be complied with forthwith, within a period oftwo weeks. 4. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of. ... Sdl- -f/' 1(1996)10SCC-567 ^^ •^o^ I-/ N