Crl.M.No.M-10442 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-10442 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 10, 2010 Rajiv Sharma @ Monu .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Johan Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.P.M.Anand, Addl.A.G., Haryana. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.490, dated 20.11.2009, under Sections 406/420/465/467 IPC, registered at Police Station Sector 7, Faridabad. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been continuing in custody since 21.11.2009. Further contended that case is still at the stage of evidence and the same is not likely to be concluded in near future. He has further contended that even complainant and his wife have not supported the prosecution version in their statements given before learned trial Court, copies of which are Annexures P1 and P2. Further contended that co-accused has already been granted bail by learned Sessions Judge, Faridabad, vide order dated 6.1.2010. Learned State counsel does not dispute these facts.There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Crl.M.No.M-10442 of 2010 (O&M) -2- The case is triable by Magistrate. Co-accused has already been granted bail. Trial is not likely to be concluded in near future. Hence, in view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner- Rajiv Sharma @ Monu for grant of regular bail is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Faridabad. 10.5.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge