IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.154 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.4667 OF 2000 Rabia Abdul Gani ... Plaintiff Vs. S.P. Sharma and Ors ....Defendants And Charles P. Baptista and Ors. ....Applicants ----- None for Plaintiff Mr.G.C. Mohonty for Applicants Mrs.Yogini Gada i/b. M/s.Harakchand & Co. for Defendant No. ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 15TH SEPTEMBER, 2009 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Defendants and the Applicants. 2. None appears on behalf of the Plaintiff. 3. This Chamber Summons is taken out by the Applicants for adding the persons mentioned in the Schedule A as Defendant Nos.3 to 8 to the plaint. 4. It is the contention of the Applicants that by agreement of sale dated 24.6.1982, the Applicant No.1 had agreed to purchase from the Defendant No.2 flat No.16 on the 4th Floor and subsequently, by agreement dated 15.3.1984, the earlier agreement was modified and further agreements were made by the Applicant No.2,3,4,5 and 6 with Defendant No.2. It is submitted that, therefore the Applicants would be affected if any decree is passed in the suit and, therefore, they are appropriate and necessary parties. 5. No reply has been filed by the Defendants in the Chamber Summons. In my view, prima facie, does appear that the right of the Applicants will be affected if any decree is passed in the suit. Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (a-i). The Plaintiff is directed to amend the plaint within eight weeks. 6. S.O. for eight weeks. (V.M. KANADE J.)