IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20644 of 2011 Arbind Kumar @ Arbind Kumar Rai @ Arbind Rai Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02/- 15/07/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is one of named accused in this complaint case being husband of the complainant with allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. specifically after getting employment for last two and half years. One informatory petition appears filed on behalf of the father of the petitioner prior to filing of the complaint petition. Further, it is submitted, that petitioner intends to resume and continue the marital life with the complainant, who is his one and only wife. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, on the event of petitioner filing an application showing the intention as stated above with an offer to pay a sum of Rs. 1,000/- (one thousand only) per month by way of interim maintenance to the complainant, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the petitioner, namely, Arbind Kumar @ Arbind Kumar Rai @ Arbind Rai, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, Patna, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1080 (C) of 2010, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years or 2 till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation or even single default in payment, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)