IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 925 of 2011 Shri Sudhanshu Mishra S/O Late Sri Raghunath Prasad Mishra, R/O 14 Mohini Road, Dehradun. … Petitioner. Versus 1. Additional District Judge, F.T.C. V Dehradun. 2. Shri Praveen Kumar Sharma, S/O Sri Jaipal Singh, R/O 167, D.L.Road, Dehradun. … Respondents. Mr. Piyush Garg, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. K.C.Tiwari, Brief Holder, learned counsel for the respondent no.1. Date May 16, 2011. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. The only prayer made in the present writ petition is that the respondent no. 1 be directed to decide M.C.A. No. 165 of 2010 Sri Sudhanshu Mishra Vs. Shri Praveen Kumar Sharma, (arising out of order dated 30-10-2010 passed in O.S. No. 627 of 2009) pending in that court, expeditiously within a time frame. According to the petitioner, in O.S. No. 627 of 2009, the trial court had decided Issue No. 5 pertaining to the valuation of the suit. The trial court appears to have decided the Issue No. 5 on 30-10-2010 in favour of the respondent no. 2-defendant and directed the plaintiff-petitioner to value the suit on the basis of the market value as mentioned in the sale deed filed by the respondent and directed the plaintiff to pay court fee accordingly. Aggrieved by that order, the plaintiff-petitioner filed M.C.A. No. 165 of 2010 before the appellate Court on 19-11-2010. The petitioner-plaintiff is aged about 75 years. Considering the fact that the plaintiff-petitioner is aged about 75 years, the respondent no. 1 is directed to decide the M.C.A. No. 165 of 2010 on merits after hearing all the parties in accordance with law, expeditiously as far as possible. With the said observations, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (B.S.Verma, J.) RCP