WP(C) 448/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE U.B.SAHA At the motion hearing stage, while this Court pointed out that in the writ petit ion, there is no such statement except the alleged oral statement of the respond ent No.2 that the respondent authority is, in any way, denying the appointment o f the petitioners, even after their selection on the basis of interview, the lea rned Counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners may be allowed to w ithdraw the writ petition with a liberty to file representation to the appropria te authority and ultimately, if the petitioners are aggrieved by the order of th e respondent-authority, then liberty may be given to the petitioners to file ap propriate writ petition. Heard Mr. M. R. Pathak, learned standing Counsel for the respondents-Edu cation Department. The prayer is allowed. The writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn .