IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33687 of 2011 Anmol Yadav son of Gopal Yadav, resident of village-Karuwaili, Police Station-Kumar Khand, District-Madhepura. …..Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar …Opposite party. ----------- 03/ 24.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is an accused for offences punishable under Sections 418, 468, 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation is that one Basudeo Yadav paid money to the Karamchari Sitaram Yadav and accordingly receipt was issued to him for the land in question which did not belong to the Basudeo Yadav, rather it belonged to some Paswan and the money paid by Basudeo Yadav was also not deposited in the Government Treasury. Learned counsel for the petitioner further avers that the informant is neither Basudeo Yadav nor Paswan, rather the informant is one Abhinandan Yadav who stated that he was the Clerk of Basudeo yadav and also claimed that the petitioner was private clerk of the said Karamchari. Learned counsel for the petitioner also states that the entire allegation against the petitioner is absolutely false and frivolous and the petitioner has been implicated only due to village politics as he is only an agriculturist not connected with the Karamchari. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. Petitioner, namely Anmol Yadav, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below - 2 - within fifteen days from today, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000.00 (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri A. Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Madhepura in connection with Complaint Case No.692-C of 2009 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sunil (S. N. Hussain, J.)