IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR No.719 of 2010(O&M) Decided on:- 06.07.2011 Rajni ......Petitioner Versus Ashok Kumar @ Galghotoo and another .......Respondents Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajai Lamba Present: Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. **** Ajai Lamba, J(Oral) CRM No. 11968 of 2010 Delay of 212 days in filing the revision petition is condoned. CRM is allowed. CRR No. 719 of 2010 The revision petition has been filed by the complainant against the judgment of acquittal in a FIR case. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has not been able to show any piece of material evidence that has not been considered by the trial Court. Learned counsel has further not been able to show that evidence has been perversely read. On perusal of the judgment, I find that the case of the prosecution is based on statement of accused while in custody. Self suffered confession in custody of police would not make conclusive piece of evidence to indicate commission of offence, as alleged. No ground for interference in revisional jurisdiction is made out. Petition dismissed. 06.07.2011 ( Ajai Lamba) mamta Judge