IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.331 of 2011 KRISHNA MURARI ROY @ BAUAH COMPANY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 18.03.2011 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 395 of the I.P.C. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner nor petitioner has been put on T.I.P. Moreover the informant has not identified anyone as a result of which co-accused Sanjay Kumar has been acquitted, that can be a good ground for grant of regular bail. Let learned Court below consider the regular bail of the petitioner in the background of the fact that co- accused has been acquitted and informant has neither identified Sanjay Kumar nor anyone. With the observations made above, the application stands disposed off. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)