IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.16166 of 2008 Between: 1 Kona Nageswara Rao S/o.Jogulu R/o.Chintalapalem Kasimkota Mandal Visakhapatnam District 2 Kona Srinivasa Rao S/o.Jogulu R/o.Chintalapalem Kasimkota Mandal Visakhapatnam District ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Superintendent of Police,Visakhapatnam 2 The Sub Divisional Police Officer,/D.S.P. Anakapalli (V&M), Visakhapatnam Dsitrict 3 The Station House officer,Kasimkota Police station kasimkota V&M, Visakhapatnam District 4 Nutigattu Satyanarayana S/o.Yarkuayya R/o.Jattapureddy Tuni Kasimkota Mandal Visakhapatnam District .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners:NONE APPEARED Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3:AGP FOR HOME ORDER: Complaining undue interference by respondent No.3 with the civil disputes between the petitioners on the one hand and respondent No.4 on the other, the present writ petition is filed. At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioners. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submitted that on an earlier occasion, on the complaint given by respondent No.4, a case was registered against the petitioners and on 26.01.2008, the same was closed referring it as civil in nature. She further submitted that again, on the complaint of respondent No.4, Crime No.23 of 2008 was registered against the petitioners under Section 107 Cr.P.C. and the same is pending. She also submitted that except to the extent of requiring the presence of the petitioners in connection with the said crime, respondent No.3 has not been interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioners and respondent No.4. In view of these submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.3 not to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioners and respondent No.4 except to the extent of investigation in connection with the crimes registered, if any, including Crime No.23 of 2008. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP.No.20945 of 2008 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 1st JUNE, 2009. kvni