1 SB Civil Writ Petition No.4547/2009 Hiralal Pannu. vs. State of Raj. & Ors. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4547/2009 Hiralal Pannu. vs. State of Rajasthan and others. Date : 11.5.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.KS Gill, for the petitioner. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that number of writ petitions have been disposed of at admission stage without notice to the respondents in view of the fact that the petitioner's prayer is that his representation may be considered as while making appointment to the post of Teacher Grade-III, the respondents have not adhered to the preference desired by him for his posting. It is asserted that the persons who stood at lower pedestal than him were employed at the place of their choice but the same treatment was not extended to the petitioner. 2 SB Civil Writ Petition No.4547/2009 Hiralal Pannu. vs. State of Raj. & Ors. On the aforesaid contention, in identical matter i.e. SBCWP No.7588/2008 (Mangilal Bishnoi vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) decided on 24.9.2008, this Court observed that though the posting as per preference cannot be claimed as a right, however, the same being asked by the respondents themselves in the application form, it is expected from them to adhere it as far as possible. Following the same view as taken in writ petition no.7588/2008, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondent no.2 to consider the representation, if the petitioner submits within a period of one month from today claiming for his posting as per preference given by him and after taking into account all relevant facts including the fact whether at this stage, the petitioner can be granted any relief. The representation be decided within a period of one month thereafter. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya