IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SA No.73 of 2006 Smt. Sushila Devi, wife of Ramautar Yadav, resident of Mohalla- Mirchaibari, Barmasia P.S.- Katihar, Dist- Katihar .................(Plaintiff-Appellant in court below) ..............Appellant. Versus 1. Phulchand Sah, son of Late Mahesh Sah 2. Lalita Devi, wife of Dindayal Sah Both are residents of village- Jharnotola, Kehuhia, P.S.-Pranpur, Dist-Katihar....Defendant Ist Party. (Respondent Ist Party in court below_...Respondent Ist Set. 3. Dilip Kumar Singh, son of Late Nandlal Singh 4. Mostt. Deoki Devi, wife of Late Nandlal Singh Both residents of Mohalla-Durgapur, P.S. & Dist.- Katihar ........(Defendant 2nd party-Respondent 2nd Party in court below)..Respondents 2nd Set. ----------- 6. 03. 07. 2009. Heard learned counsel for the appellant in respect of admission of this appeal under Order 41 Rule 11 C.P.C. Submission advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant are based on factual aspect and no substantial question of law which requires to be considered by this Court has been raised or is involved. Moreover, the facts remain concluded by the concurrent findings of the two courts below. In this view of the matter, I do not find any merit in this appeal which is, accordingly, dismissed. m.p. (Abhijit Sinha, J.)