.[1]. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.582 OF 2005 V.V.Mishra ...Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents. .... None for the petitioner. Mr.R.M.Sawant, Govt.Pleader for Respondent No.1. Mr.K.K.Jadhav, Advocate for Respondent No.2. .... CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : JUNE 08, 2006. JUNE 08, 2006. JUNE 08, 2006. P.C.: . The petitioner has a remedy by moving to D.R.T. considering the proceedings under the provisions of Securitisation Act. In the light of that, no interference is called for. Petition dismissed with a liberty to the petitioner to move D.R.T., if so advised. [F.I.REBELLO,J.] .[2]. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]