(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3803 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3803 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3803 OF 2004 Amjad Kasambhai Akkalkotkar & Ors ...Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors ...Respondents ..... Mr. P.B. Shah, Advocate for Applicants Mrs. A.R.S. Baxi, Advo. for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Mr. D.P. Adsule, A.P.P. for State. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. DATED: 12TH AUGUST, 2005 DATED: 12TH AUGUST, 2005 DATED: 12TH AUGUST, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicants i.e. original accused, the learned advocate for the respondent No.2 i.e. original complainant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The respondent No.2 i.e. original complainant is present in person. 2. The applicants are seeking quashing of F.I.R. No. 3036 dated 17.2.2004 registered by Vanvadi police station, Pune. The said case pertains to offence punishable under Section 135 and 138 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910. The said case has been numbered as Criminal Case No. 93 of 2004 which is now pending before the Pune Cantonment Court, Pune. (-2-) 3. It is stated that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. The learned advocate for the respondent No.2 i.e. original complainant has stated that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled and the complainant does not wish to pursue its complaint. In this view of the matter, in my opinion, no purpose would be achieved by continuing with the prosecution relating to the said case. Hence, C.R. No.3036 dated 17.2.2004 registered with Vanvadi police station, Pune and the Criminal Case No. 93 of 2004 pending before the Pune cantonment Court, Pune are quashed. 4. Application is disposed of. *****