S5ii@la Ssncl © IN THE HIGH COURT OF SVDtCKEUBE KE BILASPUR (C. 6. ) WRJT EETITION N0. 4-3Z^j-/2004 ' 1 ^ EETITIOiNER ^w ^'71^^\yw ^^' ^•"^ / '^\-^ y -<<y KESPONDENTS -,^\'^. ^''.^-VN,...-f VERSUS 4. Dr. I. Nageshwar Rao, S/o» Shri I.P.C. Rao, Aged about 38 years, Occupation ~ service, Presently working as Medical Officer, Samudaylk Swasth Kendra, Chhura, Dist. Raipur (C.G) State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Health & Family Welfare Departxaent, Mantralaya y D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G<) Director, Health Services, Raipur (C.G-) Chief Medical & Health Officer, Raipur (C.G) Block Medical Officer^ Raipur (C.G») WRIT PETITION UNDER AB'EICLE 226/227 OF TBE CONSTITOTION OF INDIA FOR ISSTOWCE OF WRIT IN THE NATOKE OF CERTIOWMII, MaNDMTOS, EROHIBI'EION J^ND JPOR OIHER SUITIkBlE WRIT OR WRIIS, ORDER OR OBDERS, DIKECTION OR DIKECTIONS ETC. im' XI-HC-22 3?TT^T^T f^i?F^it?T ^HI^ ^il W^ ^WWM, ^Tl1^iKo, 1^<YII^!1< 31TtW ^S^? ytyNi^mt^""""""""""""""""""""^, 200 Rl^^* 16.12.2004 Smt.Fou^la Mirza, coun^e! f^ Shri Sumesh BajaJ, rs-spondents/State. Heard on admission and M Petitioner ha^ bee-n transfel Chhura, ftaipur to Community order duted. 26.10,2004, b| has chQJIenged thls order only on and his eariier transferj the Administrative Trlbunai Th<a p@titi©n@F wa^ ^ar'lter to dlstrict the ground of ban impo^ed by th^ 14.12.2001. Fresh order af| by the ©overnment th th©p^+itioner from Chura +o Ors€ for 2004- exceptiorss have kept th@rein, folbwjng tiiB proc^durs iaid down b^uty ct»i^i<n<fln1:TN^* ^ te^ iR'it$« '^•3ri^i^iii r the petitiQner, ^overnment Advocate for (W.)P.No.4677/2004 for 9rant of Tcd from Communsty Healtah Centre M^ilth Centre CTcha, Jagdalpur vide the the ground that there is a ban on order has aircady by Kde order dated 14.12.2001. trangf^rred from Chura, di^tFict |pur and that was on State &ovemm€nt vide its order c2 of iong period hcss ©overnmenthas now ^a. Aithough th^ 5ov@mm@nt ha^ -E005 to ban the transfers, but TheretQre, transfer can be done, undgr me tran^fsr poiicy. Thers ^ft^i^i XI-HC-22 STT^I'^r fN^-3ilt?T ^HT^^I^T 5b^i<^ ^^f TJTRM3T, ^Tli^^co, I^RT^; 3:nt^r ^^^ ..^.....(?....../o.c..-.....ctA'2-^ '^RL 200 ^SSN^l ^NIW •f^ai' ^T^T i'^ff^R °^? to du^ order trQnsferring th©petitioner| any infirmity. The Statc Admlni^tn therefore, The earlier transfer, to it^ finalit/ and in th@^©circum| does not the petltione-r from Chura to any oth^t on the part of th^ Sovemment^ to be However, petitioner can fij| before competertt authority and the on its merit wlthdiut ob^©rvationgmad©h^r©inand if that may also b® on Its Wlth the above direction^ Consequentiy, M.(W.)P.No.^ and I..A.No.8746/20Q4 for Cer'tsfted copy a^ p@r rute^* ebt^d-Sftrt tIPNf -8 1^ 'lR^TC '^^NH^'?t¥l to the the from Chura to Orcha suffers from Itrative TribunGJ has abolished, ^hich was challenged, could not stance^ that ord@r, aft^r ^uch a JQng the i^-r ptace. There no maiafide Therefore, m^s patition do^^ not h^aring< a representatjon on other grouno's fhey be at iiberty to of being with any of the ir@ady any ri^pr@^©ntationi€p^nding t|ie petition stand^ disposed of. 1677/2004 for of Ad-intcrim of. Sd/- V.K. Shrivastava Judge [^tt^i l^v-