~ ^":v^:^^ ^. ^v^ v%^^^ '^^£S3^^ ^|^o9 HIQH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH : BSLASPUR WRST PETmON (0 No. 724 of 2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENT Mitilesh Tlwari. s/o. Shri Ram Chandra Tiwari, aged about 45 years, r/o. Namnatela Ring Road Ambikapur. Distt. Sarguja (CG). Versus State Transport Authority Chhattisgarh D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 0/Vrit petition under Artic!e 226 of the Constitutjon of Jndia) Slngle Bench : Hon'ble Shrt Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Mr. B.K. Chakraborty. counsej for the petitioner. Mr. Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. MGRDER (Passed on this 5tn day of February, 2009) With the consent of iearned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finaliy. 2) Learnect counse! appearing for the petitloner. on instructions. submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage. However. the respondent-authorities may be directed to eonsider and dedde his pending application dated 21-11-2006 (Annexure Pfl), in aceordance with law, on its own merits. as expeditiousSy as possibie. 3) Shri Thakur, learned Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent submits that there is no reason asto why the representation of the petitioner, as stated above shou'd not be consldered expeditjously. Shri Thakur further submits that the above-stated representatjon shall be considered and decided by the concerned authority, in accordance with the iaw, on ite own merits, withjn a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. •'y ^-~. ff ^? ^.'?1- Raju ' 2-- ® 4) In view of the ciear statement made by iearned counsel appearing for the respondent, according to jearned counse! appearing for the petitioner, nothing remains to be adjudicated. 5) Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge