IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12287 of 2011 1. DEEPAK KUMAR S/O VIJAY YADAV. 2. UDAY KUMAR S/O RAMJEE GOPE. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 04.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 324, 308 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioners to have caused bleeding injury by bottle. The specific accusation of snatching chain is against petitioner no. 1 whereas the accusation against petitioner no. 2 is of taking Rs. 5500/-. A supplementary affidavit has been filed which reflects that petitioner no. 1 is involved in four other cases. On that ground alone this Court is not inclined to interfere. Hence, application for anticipatory bail of petitioner no. 1 is rejected. Since there is no specific accusation against petitioner no. 2 of causing injury to the informant and it is submitted that there is no injury report on the record, let the petitioner no. 2, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, 2 in connection with Chouk P.S. Case No. 11 of 2011, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner no. 1, if possible on the same day, without being prejudiced the order of this Court. Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)