BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Fourth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.S.KARNAN CRL OP(MD) No.13468 of 2011 K.C.PALANISAMY ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED -1 Vs STATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE MAYANUR POLICE STATION, KARUR DT CR NO. 226/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.SHANMUGASUNDARAN, Senior Advocate for M/S. S.RAVI Advocate For Respondent : M/S. A.RAMAR, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is arrayed as A-1 and he was arrested on 19.09.2011 for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 143, 353, 506(i) I.P.C. read with 3(1) of T.N.P.P.D.L Act, 1992 and 4(1), 4(1A), 21(1) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act 1957 and 36-A of Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959 in Crime No.226 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail. 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the main allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner and the other accused are quarrying sand without prior permission from the river bed of cauvery and from the poromboke lands of Mayanur Village. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that he has to get instructions from the Inspector of Police concerned and hence seeks adjournment. 4. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public prosecutor appearing for the State. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the age of the petitioner and also he is a sitting M.L.A., this Court is https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditoins. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kulithalai and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. sd/- 04/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 2 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II KULITHALAI 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KARUR 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MAYANUR POLICE STATION, KARUR DT 5 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, TRICHY +1. CC to M/S. S.RAVI Advocate SR.No.34732 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13468 of 2011 Date :04/10/2011 SMA/03.10.2011/7C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/