MC 1067/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY It appears from the office note dated 07.12.2011 that the service is com plete. The respondent No.1 has entered appearance through the learned counsel. None appears today on behalf of respondent No.2. Hence the proceeding will proce ed ex-parte against the said respondent. Heard Mr. Ganguly, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. Goswami, l earned counsel respondent No.1. The applicants by the present application are seeking for condonation of delay of 104 days in preferring appeal against the judgment and order dated 26. 07.2010 passed by the learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sonitpur a t Tezpur, in MAC Case No.74/2006. Having heard the learned counsel for the appearing parties and upon peru sal of the averments made in the application seeking condonation of delay, I am of the view that the applicants were prevented by sufficient cause in not filing the appeal in time. Hence the delay occurred in preferring the appeal is condoned. Misc. case stands allowed.