IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 48 OF 2009 MRS. VILASINI V. SALGAONKAR ... Petitioner Versus STATE THROUGH P. P. AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Sahish Mahambrey, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. W. Coutinho, Public Prosecutor for the respondents. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 12th October, 2009 P.C. Although the respondent no.2 is not yet served, he has appeared in person alongwith the petitioner and her Advocate and both have filed an application for compounding the offence. 2. In the application, it is stated that the petitioner has already deposited in this Court an amount of Rs.60,000/- which shall be paid to the respondent no.2/complainant. In the circumstances, therefore, leave to compound is granted. Offence against the petitioner/accused under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act 1881 shall stand compounded and the petitioner/accused shall stand acquitted therefrom. The amount of Rs.60,000/- deposited by the petitioner shall be paid to the respondent no.2/complainant by the Registry without any further orders. As a result the impugned orders dated 18.09.2009 as well as 03.10.2006 shall stand set aside. Proceedings closed. N. A. BRITTO, J. lh/.