IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24314 of 2008. MANOJ SAHNI s/o Late Ram Ayodhya Shani, R/o village Sugauli P.S. Sugauli District East Champaran. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 15.10.2008 The case is under Section 387 IPC. Heard. The informant claimed that ransom money was demanded from him through a call made from Mobile No. 9385695101 and subsequently four messages were also received by the informant from the said Mobile for the same purpose and call had been made by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in Para- 26 of the supplementary case diary, the I.O. has mentioned that on verification he learnt that the Mobile No. 9385695101 from which ransom had been made stood in the name of one Shailendra Kumar/Arjun Thakur. Mr.S.R.Haque, learned A.P.P. does not deny this statement as in Para-26 of the supplementary case diary. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the concerned Mobile did not stand in the name of the petitioner and that he has been implicated on suspicion. He also submits that any ransom money has also not been paid. Further submission is that the petitioner is in custody since 16th August 2007. Learned A.P.P. does not point out any other material. Under the circumstances, petitioner Manoj Sahni is 2 admitted to bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari in Turkaulia (Banjaria) P.S.Case No. 136 of 2007. Jay/ (C.M. Prasad,J)