IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE MONDAY, THE 18TH DECEMBER 2006 / 27TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 WP(C).No. 33454 of 2006(G) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: -------------- 1. K.K.ANTONY, S/O.KURIAKOSE, AGED 41, KALARIKKAL HOUSE, VADAKKEMURI, CHERTHALAI. 2. ABRAHAM, S/O.PETER, AGED 51, THUNDIPARAMBU HOUSE, PANDAVATHU ROAD, MARADU. BY ADV. SRI.K.K.VIJAYAKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ---------------- 1. THE MARADU GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MARADU, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. THE SECRETARY, MARADU GRAMA PANCHAYAT, MARADU, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/12/2006,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 33454 OF 2006 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of December, 2006 JUDGMENT The grievance of the petitioners is that though the constructions made by the petitioners on the strength of permit issued by the Panchayat, conforms strictly to Exts.P2 and P3 approved plan and permit, the Panchayat is yet to assign door number for the building. I do not propose to examine the genuineness of the above grievance. Ext.P13 is seen pending before the Panchayat. The Panchayat will take Ext.P13, conduct necessary inspection and take a decision on Ext.P13 at the earliest and at any rate within three weeks of receiving copy of this judgment. If the Panchayat is not inclined to grant prayers in Ext.P13, the Panchayat will issue hearing notice to the petitioners and will hear them before orders are passed. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE btt WPC 2