CWP(T) No. 12243 of 2008 6.08.2010 Present: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R. K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr. Ajit Saklani, Advocate, vice counsel for respondent No. 4. CMP(T) Nos. 104 of 2010 and 105 of 2010 Applications allowed and documents taken on record. CWP(T) No. 12243 of 2008 The matter was heard for some time. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that his client be permitted to make a representation to the State for consideration in accordance with law on sympathetic and equitable grounds. More so for the reason that two persons namely Purshottam Singh and Amar Nath who were considered alongwith the petitioner at the time of appointment, even though junior in the list sponsored by the ex-servicemen cell, were given appointment w.e.f. 23.8.1995 which is evident from the office order placed on the file. Petitioner was given appointment w.e.f. February, 1996. It is in this manner, as is now being alleged by the petitioner that he stands discriminated. 2. Mr. R. K. Sharma, learned Senior Addl. Advocate General has no objection to the same. In fact he submits that any such representation made by the petitioner shall not only be considered sympathetically but also disposed of expeditiously. -2- 3. Accordingly without going into the merits of the case, petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the respondent/authorities within a period of two weeks from today. Such representation shall contain the documents which have been placed on record in the present petition. The same shall be considered by the appropriate authority, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. Needless to add the authority shall pass a reasoned order copy of which shall be supplied to the petitioner. If need so arises the petitioner shall also be afforded opportunity of hearing/ representation. 4. With the aforesaid observations the present petition stands disposed of. Liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the Court again if found necessary. Dasti copy. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. August 6, 2010 (PK)