IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40589 of 2009 MOTIUR RAHMAN & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04/ 07.04.2010 This application has been brought under the heading “To Be Mentioned” at the instance of the petitioners. It has been pointed out that inadvertently in paragraph 3 of the order dated 22.01.2010 in the submission portion it has been mentioned that in test identification parade, petitioner no.1 was identified by two independent witnesses whereas petitioner no.2 was identified by one witness. The fact is that it was vice-versa. Petitioner no.1 was identified by one witness and petitioner no.2 was identified by two witnesses. The above submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners shall form part of the order dated 22.01.2010. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)