250k mm gm; @ [N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR IC.G.l WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ‘3 M 6 /2006 PETITIONERS 1. Jethu Ram Pal S/o Chamrgun Aged- about 5O years, R/o Village- Rengani, Post- Kesada, Tahsil— Simaga, Distt.- Raipux [C.G.] .....Q ‘r ‘ 72. Dukalha Kaushal S/o shankar R/o / \9 (\V \ r x3.Sub Divisional Oflicer . $ _ ‘ Q5 3&9 Public Works Depaitment - f/ Bhantapara, Raipur [C.G.] WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT ORDER OR DIRECTIONS : / ' LXG‘M a/izJ/yyn : gelqc§.i.-"”w.__.«...., K . f’r (rd/‘5” . Vmage- Pausarl, bat— SLmaga, Raipur [C.G.] VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1 .State of Chhatu'sgarh Through— Secretary Public Works Department D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur [C.G.] 2.Engineer in Chief - Public Works Department ’ 0? b D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipux [C.G.] XI—HC-78 WW 3am, Wm,W . .k;~:€..‘$.i6ffi\.¥:b§ m m Wm (W) WWW wmgm WW§WW v %31%man%w I 7 8 ?OO5mmaféam 5hri Sanjay Pm‘el, counsel 1 5hri 5.. Gupfta, Dy. 6.A. for Heard. The main grievance of 'rhe or The pe‘ri'rioners. responden‘rs No.1 To 3, on advance copy. pefi‘rioners is fhaf They are permanen'r Gangman and working in -'rhe Public Works Depar'rmen‘l' since {as-f 27 years, even Then fhey are noT being regular'ized and The salary on The ground of equai work & equal pay is no‘i' being provided 1'0 fhem. The pe‘ri'i'ioners‘ case is Tha‘r fhe ersfwhile S‘rafe of MP. framed service Rules for The Gangman as Madhya Pradesh Gangman Service Rules, 1996 (for shor'l' ‘fhe Rules, 1996') and These rules came in'ro force w.e.f.1.1.96. As per lhese rules, fhe Gangmem who have worked for abouf 25 years shall be regularized and salary Will also be paid ‘l’o fhem. The pefifioners have requisi‘re qualifica‘rions for fherefore, if has been prayed Tha‘l’ rize 'rhe services of 'l'he pe'l'ifioners. e ' pefi'lioners submi‘H'ed Tha‘l‘ The 27 years i.e. before 31121988 and fherefore; fhey are en‘l’i'l’led for 1996, bu+ fheir cases are nof being considered inspife of represen‘l'a ions made by fhe pe‘l’ifioners. Learned counsel for fhe iregularizafion, as such, fhey moved represenfafions bu'r all in vein, respondenfs be direc‘red To regul Learned counsel for pe‘ri‘rioners are working since la 1' fhey are permanen‘l’ Gangmen regularizafion as per fhe Rules pe‘ri‘l’ioners fur'rher submi‘l'fed Tha'l, fherefore, responden'r No.2 be d recfed To ensure fhaf +he cases of The P.T.O. XI—HC—78 WW,WW,W WW ..................... 11a 200 WW(W) WWW . wmwm mmmm A2 pefi‘rioner-s are considered .in Rules,1996 _ for Their regulari responden'rs has no objecfion. Having heard learned cou record and The Ruies, 1996, wi'H of The case of each of The pe‘r direc‘r The concerned Execu‘rive www&wm r m%nan%sr accordance wi'rh Rules 5 & 7 of fhe Izafion To which learned counsel for / Roshan/'— pefi‘rioners and 1'0 examine & pe‘l’i‘l’ioners for fheir regulari: par‘l'icular‘ly; Rules 5 and 7 of ‘r comple'l’ed wifhin c period of 3 rr Wi‘rh fhe direcfion aforei onThs from Today. Cerfified copy as per rule aid, The peTiTion sTands disposed of. asel for The par-Hes, having perused 1'he wuf expressing any opinion on The meriT iTioners, respondenT No.2 is direcTed To Engineer To consider The cases of The scruTinize The case of each of The aTion in accordance wiTh Rules, 1996, he Rules, 1996. This exercise should be Sn Sd/— , L.C. Bhadoo Judge P.T.O.