1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.365 OF 1999 1) Ravindra @ Devidas s/o Uttamrao Patait, Age: 34 Yrs., occu. Pvt.Service, r/o Thorale Patangaon, Tq. & Dist.Beed... PETITIONER VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra .. RESPONDENT ***** Petitioner served through Court Service notice; Mr.D.R.Korde, APP for State. ---- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 26th August, 2009. PER COURT : 1) Petitioner – Ravindra was served earlier. Time was granted to him to furnish a certified copy of Judgment recorded against the co-accused. In spite of exhausting sufficient time since three years, no compliance. It appears, revision petitioner has lost interest in the matter. 2) It is the order below Exhibit-1 recorded by Additional Sessions Judge, whereby summons was 2 directed to be issued to the present petitioner and action under Section 319 Cr.P.C. was contemplated in the light of the few admission given by the victim/complainant. 3) The allegations made by the victim, the complainant, before the learned Magistrate implicate, accused/petitioner – Ravindra, however, in view of the further statement to the police, it was found that there was no role of the present petitioner and consequently, application under Section 169 of Cr.P.C. was moved by the police and the matter proceeded against other two accused. During the course of evidence of the victim – Mangala, she accepted of making statement under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. dated 18.7.1998 and that the accused – Ravindra having committed sexual assault on her and even eliminated her father. It was in this scenario, order under challenge was passed/recorded by the learned Judge below Exhibit-1. The obligation cast on the present petitioner/accused to produce the judgment in relation to other two accused, 3 who were facing trial in Sessions Case No. 126/1998, is not complied. I do not see any illegality in the learned Sessions Judge passing the order below Exhibit-1 dated 9.8.1998. Consequently, Criminal Revision Application dismissed. Rule discharged. Interim stay vacated. ( K.U.CHANDIWAL ) JUDGE bdv/crrv365.99