CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.20367 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.20367 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: OCTOBER 12 , 2010 Madan Lal Jindal .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Anuj Bahan, Advocate, for Mr. Jitender S. Chahal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. D.S. Nalwa, Addl. A.G., Haryana, for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. When the case is called, the prayer is made for adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel for the petitioner is unwell. It is being regularly mentioned in the list that no adjournment would be granted without a written request. Still, this is not being complied with. Request as such can not be entertained. Request for adjournment is, therefore, declined. The petitioner has filed this petition for directing the respondents to accord sanction to the payment of leave encashment CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.20367 of 2009 -2- for 80 days in lieu of earned leave along with interest 18% p.a. The petitioner has been accorded sanction for leave encashment for 220 days only. As per the petitioner, he is entitled to leave encashment for 300 days. The notice was issued. Reply is filed. As per the reply, the earned leave has been recalculated and a sanction of leave encashment for 33 more days has been further credited to the accounts of the petitioner. If the petitioner has still any grievance to show that he has more earned leave to his credit for which he can be paid in lieu thereof, he may file representation, which will be considered and decided in accordance with law. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. October 12, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE