( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1047 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1047 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1047 OF 2008 The CIT-14 .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Malhar Information Services .. Respondent Mr.D.K.Kanwal for the Appellant. Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ. V.C.DAGA, JJ. V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATE : 17th November, 2008 DATE : 17th November, 2008 DATE : 17th November, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The learned Counsel for both the parties categorically state that the questions of law raised in this Appeal have already been answered by this Court by an order dated 8th October, 2008 passed in ITXA No.916 of 2008 in the case of The CIT V/s.M/s.Penwalt India Ltd. The CIT V/s.M/s.Penwalt India Ltd. The CIT V/s.M/s.Penwalt India Ltd., against the Revenue and in favour of the Assessee. Hence, for the same reasons as stated in the aforesaid order dated 8th Octoaber, 2008 the present Appeal also stands dismissed. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)