C.W.P. No. 2137/2008. 3.8.2009 Present: Mr. Vikram Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Dy. Advocate General, with Mr. Vikas Rathore, Dy. Advocate General, for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4. Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, counsel for respondent Nos. 5 and 6. The petitioner, by means of this writ petition has challenged the appointment of respondents No.5 and 6. The petitioner was appointed as Lecturer by the Executive Committee of the P.T.A. It is apparent from the resolution whereby approval was granted to appoint the petitioner and one another person, that the appointments were not made under the PTA policy but were only a temporary stop-gap arrangement. The petitioner has now been replaced by a regular teacher. Therefore, no direction can be passed in favour of the petitioner. The petition is accordingly rejected. (Deepak Gupta), J (Surinder Singh),J August 3, 2009 (cm)