Criminal Misc.No. M- 25713 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.No. M- 25713 of 2010 Date of decision:- 24.9.2010 Salma Begum ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present:- Mr. Brijender Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh, AAG Haryana. RAM CHAND GUPTA J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.110 dated 04.10.2009, under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC, registered at Police Station Ismailabad, District Kurukshetra. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully. This Court while issuing notice of motion on 01.9.2010, passed the following order:- “ Contends that petitioner was found innocent by the police, after investigation. Further contends that, however, petitioner has been summoned by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kurukshetra, by allowing an application filed under Section 319 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the prosecution. Further contends that petitioner has been summoned by way of non-bailable warrants for 7.9.2010. Further contends that petitioner is ready to appear before learned trial Court and face trial. Further Criminal Misc.No. M- 25713 of 2010 -2- contends that petitioner is an old lady and her entire family has been implicated in this case. Further contends that as per version of the FIR the role attributed to the petitioner is that she caught hold of the hands of the deceased. Notice of motion for 24.9.2010. However, petitioner is directed to appear before learned trial Court on 7.9.2010 and in case she so appears and applies for regular bail, she be admitted to interim bail by learned trial court to its satisfaction subject to any conditions that may be deemed to be imposed by it. Copy of the order be given dasti under the signatures of the Reader of this Court.” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has appeared before the trial Court and released on interim bail on 07.9.2010. He has also placed on record certified copy of order passed by learned trial Court in this regard. Further contends that the petitioner undertakes to appear before the learned trial Court on each and every date during trial. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that the petitioner is likely to abscond or that she is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. In view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, order dated 1.9.2010, granting interim bail to the petitioner-Salma Begum is, hereby made absolute subject to any condition that may deemed to be imposed by learned trial Court. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. September 24, 2010 ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) vj JUDGE