S^K£<-^^S'- IN THS HIOH COJRT OF JUDZCATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITIQN N0. 22.3^ OP 2002 BEfWEEN Kanhaiya l^i Gupta Q/Q oore Lal Gupta, aged about Q^~ years, resident of Munshi ismaeel verd^Bhafeapara, Distriet Raipur (CG). ^ PETITIGNER A N © 1^ yEhe State of Chhattisgarh^ rlhroiigh GolleGtor^ Raxpur (CG>» 2» Superintendent of BDlice^ mipur^ Bistrict mipur (CG)» 3« Sub Divisional Police Officer^ Bhatapara^ District Raipixr (GG), 4» Qgficer laGharge^ Police Station ghatapara^ Distriet; mipur (CG), 5« ^Shri Ledgu Ram, ^^B/Q Tilda Ban^ha, Payagaon, ^•^^J^ls11 silnga* District'I^ipur (CG). ^••^^•••^ ^'..•":'_.w^ ....•;£sf^ .^",^1^&^ RESPCT^DENTS ^:.- '>•• »••* W-" WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF rffi$E CONSTITUTION OF^ INDIA XI-HC-22 ^3:J7^I^l Rrli<=h ^T§;^I ^:fi^"^fi^r IL + ^^^i<4Id<LI, ^T[l+14^ fa^li^^< •WR^TiRTTN? 3^l?T 'qicg? _.Co.L^.2^., ^ 20QZ__ fN^X^ 'STT^T iTcfrWi^Tf 03-03-2003. Shri V. R. Tiwari, counsel fbjr fhe petittoner. Shri Sanjay K Agarwal, Dy. !Adv. Gen. fcr fhe State. The grievance offhe wiit pjetittori^r the iiiaction on the part of the respoiident Nos.2, $ & 4 m D|ot talcmg any action agamst the respondent No.5. Accordiag to ftie petitk>nei| No.5 and he is bemg tlireatened] 4)l^ld4l-i ^ii^<yiT ^ f^t" Tf^HFSK '^'3Tf^R^rr^T , he is the tenant o^respondent to dire consequenjces tf he does not evict tbe premises m questioi|i, It is stated that though. he had lodged rcport at Polk'e Statton phatapara, no action was taken. CoEaplainfs werc also lodged wifji the Town Iiispector, Bhatapara aiid Superiritendent of PoUcc, sijicc no action has bccn taken hc Iias approached this Court Jfor reljef Tlie pr^yer is raade fbr a. ^irectioii to the aufh.orities to take appropriate action on the reports ilodged by fhe petitioner. A Considering the Imiited njature of prayer, this petition is disposed ofby directLag flie said ^uthorities to deal with. fhe report lodged by the petUioner in accoijdaace witb law. It is niade clear that tihie; Court is not expressia^ any opuiion on fhe coraplaints ^l^T^T t^lTO^'S^T ^^WTittcr ^s^(. w^-^^ (^i^^T) STI^T'?^T^T< ^^ staiids disposed of. No.7280/2001 also staad disp<|)sed of, Certified copy as per Rul^s. '^fer4h'^n^ ^ ft^ Tf^^ ^'STf^RW^T made by fhe petitioner aad thi^ order is not to be construed as a direction inaiidating the PoUc^ lAufhorities td act iti a parfcicular niaiiner. They will deal wifh t|ie raatter on its own m.erit and as observed m accordaiice wifh la^y. 1 With fhe above obsewajtioiis aiid directtens, this petitM)2y Consequ^itiy M.W. P. No. 1351/ 2002 & I.A. Sd/- P.C. Naik Judge (