IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12259 of 2010 BHUBENESHWAR PD.SINGH Versus JAY NANDAN SINGH & ORS ----------- 2. 02.05.2011 Upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, this court finds that the impugned order suffers from perversity as the whole objection raised by the petitioner against the application for intervention has not been considered. Therefore, the impugned order dated 10.5.2010 passed by Sub-Judge-III, Begusarai is set aside. The trial court is directed to dispose of the application afresh by giving opportunity of hearing to all parties keeping in view earlier compromise. With the aforesaid observation, the application is disposed of. Ravi/- ( Prakash Chandra Verma, j.)