IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.758 of 2009 JITESH KUMAR & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2 30.4.2009 KHAN Heard counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are accused in a case under section 376/34 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they have been falsely implicated in the instant case, as the father of petitioner no.1 has earlier filed a case under section 395 of the Penal Code against the father of the victim. He further submits that the medical report does not support the prosecution case and further more the prosecutrix in her statement recorded under section 164 Cr.P.C. has given exaggerated version. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners for the present. Their prayer for bail is accordingly rejected. However, they may renew their prayer for bail after two months. (S.P.Singh,J)