IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc.-M. No. 25218 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision:03.11.2011 Labbal @ Bittu ........Petitioner Versus State U. T. Chandigarh ........Respondent CORAM:Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Ms. Naveen Malik,, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rakesh Nagpal, Advocate for U.T. Chandigarh. RAJESH BINDAL, J. Prayer in the present petition is for grant of regular bail, pending trial. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner is in custody since 20.04.2011. He has been falsely implicated in the present case and as per FIR, no offence under Section 307 IPC is made out. On the other hand, learned counsel for the U.T. Chandigarh states that the petitioner is the main accused who has caused injury on the face of the injured. He has further submitted that besides this case, the petitioner is involved in five other cases for heinous offences. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the allegations against the petitioner and his antecedents, I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of bail at this stage. Dismissed. 03.11.2011 (Rajesh Bindal) harjeet Judge