IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19308 of 2010 RAMBALI RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 27.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail in connection with a case registered under Sections 302, 201, 120B/34 of the I.P.C. It is alleged in the F.I.R. that from some source the informant came to know that on the orders of Fulo Devi, Ram Bali Rai, Mahesh Rai, Munesh Kamti, Patilal Paswan killed the victim. It is further alleged that when the villagers pressurized Fulo Devi, the step mother of the deceased then she made extra judicial confession that on 09.06.2009 four accused persons consumed liquor and thereafter she could not see the victim boy. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that only suspicion has been raised and moreover the extra judicial confession no way involves the petitioner in the alleged offence. Furthermore Fulo Devi has been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 45443 of 2009 contained in Annexure-2. It is further submitted that the motive has actually been alleged against the Fulo Devi and not against the petitioner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the State that suspicion has been raised against four persons including this 2 petitioner being involved in the commission of the offence at the instance of Fulo Devi. Considering the fact that only suspicion has been raised against the petitioner on information from some source but the source of information has not been disclosed in the F.I.R., moreover the extra judicial confession of Fulo Devi does not indicate the specific involvement of the petitioner in the alleged offence and Fulo Devi has been granted bail vide Annexure-2, let the petitioner namely Rambali Rai, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Gaighat P.S. Case No. 148 of 2009. Shageer (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)