IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.599 of 2008 SHAHANSHAH ALAM, S/o Khedu Mian, resident of village- Laddhi, P.S. Goreakothi, District- Siwan. ..... Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, through the Director, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. Mr. Anjani Kumar Singh, the Secretary, Primary and Adult Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. Mr. Santosh Kumar Mall, the Collector-cum- District Magistrate, Siwan. 4. Mr. Vinay Kumar, the District Superintendent of Education, Siwan. 5. Mr. Rabindra Kumar Choudhary, the Block Development Officer, Goreakothi, District- Siwan. 6. Mr. Rabindra Nath, the Block Education Officer, Goreakothi, District- Siwan. 7. Sri Subodh Kumar, the Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Sarari , Anchal- Goreakothi, District- Siwan. 8. Sri Dharmnath Prasad, the Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Sarari, Anchal- Goreakothi, District- Siwan. 9. Md. Usman, the Headmaster, Govt. Urdu Primary Maktab, Luddhi, Anchal- Goreakothi, District- Siwan. 10. Anita Kumari, Panchayat Shiksha Mitra, Govt. Urdu Primary Maktab Laddhi, Anchal- Goreakothi, District- Siwan. ..... Opposite Parties. ----------- 03- 13.05.2010 Heard Mr. Naresh Prasad No.1 for the petitioner, and Mr. Sanjay Prakash Verma, learned Assistant Counsel to Government Advocate No.5. This application under Article 215 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act has been filed by the petitioner of C.W.J.C. No.14708 of 2006 (Shahanshah Alam Vs. The State of Bihar and others), and alleges non- 2 implementation of the order dated 17.9.2007 (Annexure-1), whereby direction was given to the Block Development Officer, Goreakothi, District- Siwan, to dispose of the petitioner’s representation by a reasoned order. The same has since been disposed of by order dated 2.3.2010 (Annexure-A), whereby the petitioner’s claim has been rejected by a reasoned order. It thus appears to me that the order of this Court has been complied with. This application is accordingly disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order in accordance with law. (S K Katriar, J.) S.K.Pathak/