1 447-471.11ao.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Appeal from Order No. 447 of 2011 WITH Civil Application No. 632 of 2011 in AO 447/2011 Jayarani Shridhar Shetty Payyar ...Appellant v/s. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ...Respondent WITH Appeal from Order No. 471 of 2011 WITH Civil Application 660 of 2011 in AO 471/2011 Mr. Subhash M.S. Menon ...Appellant v/s. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ....Respondent Mr. R.A. Thorat, Sr. Counsel i/b. P.J. Thorat for appellant in AO 447/2011. Mr. P.K. Dhakepalkar, Sr. Counsel i/b. Amol P. Mhatre for appellant in AO 471/2011. Mr. A.Y. Sakhare, Sr. Counsel i/b. Joes Carlos for BMC for the respondent. CORAM: R.M. BORDE, J. 23rd t September, 2011 PC: The Appeal from Order can be disposed of by directing the trial Court to dispose of pending suit as expeditiously as possible. Both Appeals from Order raise challenge to the order passed in Notice of Motion No. 534/2010 in L.C. Suit No. 310/2010 decided on 16th March, 2011 as well as the Notice of Motion No. 1479/2011 in L.C. Suit No. 1245/2010 decided on 16th March, 2011. The application tendered by the appellants seeking stay to the execution and operation of the notice issued by the Corporation in exercise of powers under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act was turned down by the 2 447-471.11ao.sxw trial Court. After presentation of these Appeals from Order, this Court granted interim protection during the pendency and continued the ad-interim which was operating during the pendency of Notice of Motion. The interim protection granted by this Court is in operation till today. 2. The ends of justice would be met if the interim-relief granted by this Court is continued for further period until disposal of the pending suits before the City Civil Court. Learned Counsel appearing for Municipal Corporation states that if the directions are given to the Court below to dispose of the suit expeditiously and the interim-relief is continued till then, the Corporation would not have any objection and that in support of the orders for continuation of interim-relief reasons need not to be recorded. 3. I have heard the parties at length and I am convinced that the interim protection granted by the Court needs to be continued until the disposal of the pending suit. In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, it is ordered that the ad-interim relief granted by this Court on 15th April, 2011 shall continue until disposal of pending suits before the Judge, City Civil Court, Bombay. The trial Court is directed to decide the pending suit as expeditiously as possible preferably by the end of April 2012. 4. In view of the directions as noted above, both the Appeals from Order stand disposed of. 5. In view of disposal of Appeals from Order, pending Civil Applications do not survive and stand disposed of. (R.M.BORDE, J)