HE€3¢H CQEJR'F OF GHHA‘ETE$V@ARH AT EELASPUR DEVES3ON aENCH ' i; ‘ ‘ ' > 69mm HaN’ELE HGN’BLE $HR: mm suwii. RAJEEV KMMAR GUPTA, SINHA, w. J. MA. Ne. ‘E‘E5é3i2w4 MEMO g? APPEAL uNQER $E€T§GN m a2; mama ¥ ‘ > VEHicLEs ACT 1m t - 1 F>re§ent: $hn’ Anii Gu.‘ati, counsel for the appeIEants. ‘ None far respondent No.1. Shri Q Aziz, counsel for respondent No.2. 0 R e e e (23m January, 20w; The fe!iew§ng““eo;:der of the Rajeev Game, SJ. By anon/mg LA. N03386/2OG4, the appelients are exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned award. Com was passed by ( granted APPELL%NT$ 1. Ku Rajm', D/o BiseIaE, Aged abaut 18yearS Ku Vimia @ Rajwaniin D/o Siseial " ‘ Aged abaui‘ ’§3 yearg (Mimi?! Through ~ Broiher Jageshwar SXG B§$eiai Aged about 28 ygafs Beth msidant of viilage ~ Badaoda, Tah £ & DiSttRaipuHCG) ‘ ‘ ‘fag‘ws RESPGN§E§W$ 3. Kaushai Kumar $/o Keshw Ram Aged abou; 26 years Ca$fe —~ Sahu, R/a Viliage ~ BhaiheEi‘ Chowki ~ Bhakhara: Tahsii - Kurud Distt Qhamtari (Chhaiisgarh) 2. Branch Manager The New india. Insurance Co. Ltd. GE Read Power House Bhilai Dist: Durg (CG} k) C@ 2. Learned csunse! far the pms‘es» are hearaf an MOP Na.1565/2004,-an gpptication fer condonation of the de§ay in fiémg the &ppeas'. 3. On due consideratian, MCP N0.1665z’2004, is almwed and the del3y in wing the appeal is hereby condoned. 4. Sm Ami! Guiati, [earned coun3e§ for the appeliams is heard Tan atfmisgfon. 5. The appellants ‘are seeking enhanwmen‘: sf the compensation awarded by the Additional Member Meter Accidents Ciaime Tribunai, Dhamtari (for short ‘the Tribunai’), vide award dated 16.04.2004, passed in Ciaim Case No.98i2003. 6. As against the compensation oi Re.3,50,000f~ ciaimed by the claimants for the injuries stistained by them in the motor accident on 02.032003, the Tribune! awarded compensation of j Rs.iO,695/— to the appeiiants along with interest @ 8% per i annum from the date of filing of the ciaim petition tiii the date of aqtuei payment. Z _ Shri Anii Guiati, learned counsel for the appeilants vehementiy argued that the Tribunal has erred in awarding low .oompensation of Rs.10,695/* oniy, though the oiaimants l sustained multipie injuries in the motor accident. ‘8. t For the reasons‘b‘est known to the appeilants/ciaimants, no doctor was examined before theTrib’imal toeestablish thet the injuries said to have been sustained by the appeilants/olaimants in the motor accident resulted in any permanent disabiiity. . ~ i l 1 i