IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 3RD MARCH 2009 / 12TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 6849 of 2009(A) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. P.JIJINA, D/O.P.CHANDRASEKHARAN NAIR, AKSHAYA, PUTHOOR MADOM, PANTHEERAM KAVU.P.O., CALICUT - 19. 2. M.SUKUMARAN, MURALI NIVAS, PANTHEERAM KAVU, CALICUT. BY ADV. SRI.DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN SRI.K.M.ANEESH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CALICUT. 2. DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER, CALICUT. MR.P.N.SANTHOSH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.6849 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 3rd day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T It is stated that the 2nd petitioner is a licensed stamp vendor and that on account of his ill health, the 1st petitioner was appointed on a temporary basis. It is stated that by now, the 1st petitioner has acquired above six years experience. The petitioners submit that the 1st petitioner has already filed Ext.P3 and 2nd petitioner has filed Ext.P4 to the 1st respondent to appoint the 1st petitioner as the stamp vendor in the place of 2nd petitioner. Orders have not been passed on these applications and that led the petitioners to file this writ petition. 2. Taking into account, the above grievance highlighted by the writ petitioners, I direct the 1st respondent to consider Exts.P3 & P4 referred to above, in accordance with the Rules governing the same and pass orders thereon as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg