IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 11TH OCTOBER 2010 / 19TH ASWINA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 2 of 2010(S) ---------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.31530/2007 Dated 16/10/2009 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER: ------------------------------------ BEENA GEORGE, AGED 46, W/O.BALU P.MALIACKAL, LECTURER IN MATHEMATICS, MORNING STAR HOME SCIENCE COLLEGE, ANGAMALAY SOUTH P.O. BY ADV. SRI.BABU VARGHESE RESPONDENT/3RD RESPONDENT: ---------------------------------------------- P.K.VELAYUDHAN, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. N.SUDHA DEVI THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J. ------------------------------------- Contempt Case(C)No.2 Of 2010 ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 11th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner alleges non-compliance of the directions issued by this Court in Annexure-AI judgment. The learned Government Pleader pointed out that against the said judgment, S.L.P.(C)No.19868/2010 has been filed before the Apex Court. The Apex Court has granted leave and has passed an interim order dated 28.9.2010, which reads as follows: “Delay condoned. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. Leave granted. We expedite the hearing. We have perused the document dated August 20, 2010 handed over in Court by Mr.Jaideep Gupta, learned senior counsel for the appellants, which indicates that with effect from August, 20, 2010, teachers such as the respondents before us will be entitled to receive salary from the State Government. We, accordingly, feel that at this stage COC.No.2/10 -2- no further orders are necessary. The appellants shall pay the salary to the teachers as per the aforesaid order dated August 20, 2010 regularly. This will be, of course, subject to the claim of the respondents with regard to the arrears.” 2 Therefore, the respondents will have to disburse the salary as directed by the Apex Court, without prejudice to the claim of the petitioners for the arrears. The claim for arrears will depend upon the outcome of the S.L.P.(C)No.19868/10. Expeditious steps will be taken to disburse the salary from August, 2010 onwards. The Contempt of Court Case is closed as above. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE. dsn