IN IHE HIGH COURI OF JUDIGA3'UHE AI BILASPTB: (CHH^'TISSSRB)' WRIT PBTITION N6. 19^5^ 2002 PETI£TON@.: ^^.^' ^'^y ^'.^^ 'f^} ^.•^'..••^ I.**' ^ '..••'.(3..- Sudnakar Pundalik Koha-fc, son of S'ari P.Kohat, aged about ?2 years, worfeing as Offieer Junior Management, State Bank of India, presently pos-fced a-b Sta.be Banfc of India, Manendragara, Dist: Koriya (Chnattisgarh). Versus sy REgPOBBEBIS 1. T'ae State Bank of India; Through: 1-fcs Hanaging Birector, Oentral Office, Mumbai, (Hah^rashtra ) 2. Ghief General Manager, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, Hoshangabad Boad, Bhopal (M.P). 3. Seneral Manager,State Bank of India, Zonal Office, Shankarnagar, Eaipur (C.G). .,<<*'" SEI3'_PSTI3'IOI_ ARTIGLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITU'n:03T OF IBDIA ^ ^^W !£.^ :% x-isiseisaK •fS w HIGH COURT OF CHHATfSSGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER WR!T PETITION N0.945 OF 2002 Sudhakar Pundaiik Kohat RESPONDENTS The State Bank of india & others frit Petition under Artic!e 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Sinaie Bench : Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Aanjhotri, J. None for the petitioner. ihri P.R. Patankar, Advocate ! '?( i, A.W e (Passed on this 30th day The matter is calied for hearing twice: On both occasions, none appears nor is anv representation made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be Interested in tlie matter. 2) In view of the above, the writ petition is dismis^d for want of prosecution. — - Sd/- Satish K. Agiiihotri Judge