HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 153/2010 Bhagwant Singh ……… Petitioner Vs. S.S.P. Udham Singh Nagar and others …. Respondents Sri M.K. Goyal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Nandan Arya, learned A.G.A. for respondents 1 and 2. Coram: Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. Hon’ble Nirmal yadav, J. [Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J.(Oral)] By way of this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought the relief for issuing a writ in the nature of Mandamus, commanding the respondent No.6, to depute C.B.C.I.D or some other independent Agency to investigate the case of the petitioner, pertaining to the F.I.R. which was lodged by him on 01-10- 2009, as case crime No. 182 of 2009, U/S 395 I.P.C. at P.S. Kichha, District Udham Singh Nagar. Heard Sri M.K. Goyal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Nandan Arya, learned A.G.A. for the respondent/State and perused the record. Having considered the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the parties, we are of the view that by way of this writ petition, in the normal circumstances, this court is not supposed to transfer the case to any other Agency. It is the job of the State to do the needful in the matter in case the representation is moved by the petitioner before the State Government. However, in this case the police has already submitted the charge sheet and if the petitioner has any grievance against the charge sheet, he may seek the remedy available in the law. With the aforesaid observation the writ petition is disposed of finally. (Nirmal Yadav, J.) (B.C. Kandpal, J.) 27-04-2010 ISB