THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P.No.2031 of 2011 ORDER: This civil revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India not against any specific order, but against the action of the trial Court in adjourning I.A.No.671 of 2011 in O.S.No.32 of 2011 to 22.06.2011. The petitioner filed O.S.No.32 of 2011 in the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Chirala, against the respondents, for the relief of perpetual injunction in respect of the suit schedule property, which is a Aqua Form, where prawns are said to have been grown. I.A.No.671 of 2011 was filed with a prayer to appoint an Advocate-Commissioner to auction the produce, stating that any further delay would result in damage to the entire crop. The trial Court is said to have taken up the matter on 07.06.2011 but adjourned it to 22.06.2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Having regard to the nature of disposal being given by this Court to the revision, it is not necessary to issue notice to the respondents. However, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the respondents are already served with notices. In the ordinary course of things, no exception can be taken to the issuance of notice returnable in 15 days by the trial Court. However, the prawn culture involves many sensitivities and unless timely action is taken, there is every likelihood of the entire crop being damaged. The change of season would have its own impact on the crop. Therefore, the matter needs to be taken up urgently. Hence, the civil revision petition is disposed of, directing the trial Court to take up I.A.No.671 of 2011 in O.S.No.32 of 2011 on 14.06.2011 and pass appropriate orders after hearing both the parties forthwith. There shall be no order as to costs. _________ 10.06.2011 Jsu THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P.No.2031 of 2011 Date: 10.06.2011