IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA 1932 OP (FC).No. 853 of 2010(R) -------------------------- OP.2013/2009 of FAMILY COURT,ERNAKULAM .................... PETITIONER --------------------- SEEMA K.B.,D/O.BABU K.M., KUSAVARU PARAMBIL HOUSE, ANCHUMANA, EDAPPALLY P.O., ERNAKULAM,KOCHI-24 BY ADV. SRI.MATHEWS K.PHILIP SMT.T.MANASY RESPONDENT): --------------- PRAKASH K.V.,S/O.LATE KUNJAMBU, PADINJARAYIL HOUSE, PATTIYAM, PATTAAYAKUNNU P.O.,THALASSERY NOW WORKING AS HEALTH INSPECTOR, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, KEEZHUMAD P.O.,ALUVA THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ----------------------------------------------------- O.P.(F.C) No.853 of 2010 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of November 2010 JUDGMENT Basant, J. The petitioner, who has initiated proceedings for divorce before the Family Court against the respondent - her husband, by filing O.P.No.2013 of 2009, prays that her petition may be disposed of expeditiously and out of turn. She has enumerated the reasons for claiming such early out of turn disposal of the petition. 2. Did the petitioner move the court below? What, if any, is the order passed by the court? Why is it that the petitioner has chosen to rush to this Court without and before moving the trial court for an early out of turn expeditious disposal? No satisfactory answers are forthcoming for these queries. 3. We must frown upon the threat to our time by such petitions filed by the parties. It is for the petitioner to move the Family Court for an early out of turn expeditious disposal of her petition filed in 2009 showing all the reasons. The Family Court, O.P.(F.C) No.853 of 2010 - 2 - needless to say, must consider those reasons and pass appropriate orders. If the petitioner is aggrieved by such orders, then and then alone can she think of approaching this Court with any petition. We cannot obviously fix the schedule for work of the subordinate courts by invoking our jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution. 4. This petition is, in these circumstances, dismissed, but with the specific observation that if the petitioner moves an application for an out of turn expeditious disposal showing the reasons, the Family Court must consider the same and pass appropriate orders. 5. Hand over a copy of this judgment to the learned counsel for the petitioner for production before the Family Court. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE) rtr/