1 ca 7667.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7667 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7172 OF 2007 Bahinabai W/o Balasaheb Suryavanshi .. Applicant Versus Balasaheb S/o Shankarrao Suryavanshi .. Respondent Shri M. P. Kale, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri S. B. Ghatol Patil, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 12TH AUGUST, 2011. PER COURT : . This is an application for withdrawal of the amount. Earlier this Court in Civil Application No. 8898/2008 after hearing the parties had passed an order allowing the applicant to withdraw Rs. 20,000/- and directed the Registry to keep the remaining amount in the fixed deposit and also allowed the applicant to withdraw the quarterly interest on the said F. D. 2. Shri Kale, the learned counsel for the applicant submits 2 ca 7667.11 that the relationship is not disputed. The applicant is the wife of the respondent and as such she would be entitled for the amount. 3. As the earlier order is passed after hearing the parties, I do not think it appropriate to pass any orders at this stage. However, taking into account the nature of the dispute, it would be appropriate to hear the writ petition finally at an earlier date. 4. In the light of above, the civil application is disposed of. Fix the writ petition for final hearing in the week commencing from 17th October, 2011. In case the writ petition cannot be heard, within reasonable time, then liberty to the applicant to renew the prayer made in the present civil application. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/Aug. 11