IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BIuASPUR (CHHATISGARH) w. P. N0. (261 g/OF 200% Pé ETITIONE g Sanjay Kumar Gupta S/o f Saryu Prasad Gupta, aged about 25 years, R/o near 1 ,4 PunjabiColony,Dayalband ' Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) w %“"éL¥,.a% v.“ w $3 wgx‘x. Wfk ‘ > ’ XR‘ESPONDENW VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Department of Commercial Tax (Excise), Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan ‘{,‘Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ‘yf2. Commissioner Excise), Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG) 3. Collector (Excise) District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 4. Assistant Commissioner Excise, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226f,./o'E‘ THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSU CE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIOR Rf MANDAMUS PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT ORE WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIREGTIONS. ORDER OR ORDERS5 I Petitioners above-named most respectfully, Ela As mentioned in the Cause Title abOV ‘, \‘ . As mentioned in the Cause Title above. ( m. e XI—HC—78 3mm ;..&€....95.3§.¢g 200 m 31 few am Mm! Wm? mvfgam Wwm m Qivision Bench : Hon’ble Shri [)hi Hon’hle $hri RE! {0 11 01201 0: Common order passed se Ujjaine Vs. State of CG and othe $igned and dated. Howey that the issues involved in WARN different. therefore. the aforesaid W i i n\ Sd/- i, 1 ‘ DI-ERENDRA NHSHRA a i’\\ Judge i 'endra i Chan paratei in W.P‘No.649/03‘ Krisna Kumar rs, inciuding this petition. ‘er‘ while dictating the order, it was noticed 05.1 1 76/03‘ 1573/03 & 1536/03 are entirely ey k / i HAN i cases are hreb deiined. ‘ Sdl— Arm CDRAKAR i i' ‘ VANGAN Judge ‘mm (Wu) NW Miehra. & drakar JJ y h / g