IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 22ND NOVEMBER 2010 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 34885 of 2010(I) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- JOGI PHILIP, VAZHAPPILLIL HOUSE, NEDIYASALA P.O., THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGEKUTTY MATHEW. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, PAINAV, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN – 685 603. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, THODUPUZHA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 4. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, P.W.D.(ROAD SECTION), THODUPUZHA P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT – 685 584. 5. MATHAI, S/O.LUKA, KULATHAPPALLIL HOUSE, NEDIYASALA P.O., THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN – 685 584. 6. LUKA, S/O.MATHAI, KULATHAPPALLIL HOUSE, NEDIYASALA P.O., THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN – 685 584. R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P. NARAYANAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/11/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 34885 OF 2010 ===================== Dated this the 22nd day of November, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner seeks a direction for cancellation of Ext.P3 patta issued in favour of the 5th respondent. Petitioner is a third party, and if at all the petitioner has any grievance, it is for the petitioner to seek the statutory remedies that are available. Therefore, I am not persuaded to interfere with Ext.P3 in this writ petition. Writ petition fails and is dismissed. However, it is clarified that this judgment will not affect the petitioner's right, if any, to pursue the statutory remedies. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp