HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.9972 of 2007 04.02.2008 Between: Kothapalli Sirisha … Petitioner AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh and others … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.9972 of 2007 ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus to set aside notification, dated 07.02.2007 issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short ‘the Act’), whereby the petitioner’s land admeasuring Ac.1.50 cents comprised in Survey No.219/3A situated at Pamulaparru Village, Undi Mandal, West Godavari District, is proposed to be acquired. Heard Sri Ch.Dhanamjaya, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition. At the hearing, it is conceded by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the main contention raised in this writ petition, namely, validity of proposal to acquire agricultural land without its conversion for non-agricultural use is no longer res integra in view of judgment, dated 28.12.2007, passed by this Court in Writ Petition Nos.18881 of 2006 and batch, wherein a similar contention has been rejected. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that enquiry as contemplated under Section 5A of the Act is dispensed with by the respondents. In the counter affidavit filed by Sri K.Venkateswarlu, Revenue Divisional Officer and Land Acquisition Officer, Narsapur, West Godavari District – respondent No.3, it is inter alia stated that notices under Section 5A of the Act were issued to the petitioner and objections were called for. The petitioner attended the enquiry and filed her objections, upon which, he submitted a report to the second respondent, who in turn, considered the objections filed by the petitioner and rejected the same vide his proceedings, dated 08.05.2007. In view of the above, I am satisfied that enquiry was already held under Section 5A of the Act, in which the petitioner filed her objections, which were considered and rejected. The petitioner failed to question the order, rejecting her objections. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition, interim order, dated 09.05.2007 is vacated, WPMP.No.12646 of 2007 is dismissed and WVMP.No.2347 of 2007 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 4th FEBRUARY, 2008. kvni