IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1856 of 2009 DEEPAK KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kr.Ambastha For the State : Mr. Jitendra Kr.Singh,APP 5 3.5.2010 This revision application has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 4.9.2009 passed by Sessions Judge, Begusarai in Criminal Appeal No. 92 of 2009 by which he dismissed the appeal and confirmed the order dated 27.7.2009 passed in Mansoorchak P.S. Case No. 10/2008 (G.R.No. 583/08) by Juvenile Justice Board, Begusarai whereby he has rejected the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Having similar allegation, petitioner’s father Raj Kumar Mahto and one Ganesh Mahto have been allowed bail by different Benches of this Court vide Cr.Misc.No. 44114 of 2008 and Cr.Misc.No. 43490 of 2009. So, there can be no justification to refuse petitioner’s bail having privilege under section 12 of Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000. Petitioner is in custody since 27.3.2009 which has not been considered by both the courts below. 2 Accordingly, the revision application is allowed and judgment and orders of both the courts below are set aside. let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Juvenile Justice Board, Begusarai in Mansoorchak P.S. Case No. 10/2008 corresponding to G.R.No. 583/08. It is made clear that one of the bailer shall be petitioner’s near relation who shall undertake to keep the petitioner under his observation and shall produce him whenever is ordered by the Juvenile Justice Board. The judgments and orders of both the courts below are set aside. Let this order be communicated to the aforesaid court below through fax at the cost of the petitioner. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)