c.-^ i ^ ^- 4 ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.fQ N0. /2009 (S.B.) PETITIONER KV^.^?'... ..<•'*'\^-\ ^ ^'' ..-'•'"<^:'\ V.-"' ^^>" ^•••""" RESPONDENTS : Uchit Ram Rathiya, S/o Ghasirain @ Nanki Ram Rathiya, aged about^^years <^ R/o village - Jivari, Tahsil - Gharghoda, Distt.- Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary Panchayat 85 Social Welfare Department,D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Collector, Raigarh, Distt. - Raigarh (C.G.) 3. Deputy Director, Panchayat & Social Welfare, Raigarh, Distt.- Raigarh (C.G.) 4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Gharghoda, District- Raigarh (C.G.) 5. Jagat Ram, S/o Kartik Ram, R/o Village — Jivari, Tahsil - Gharghoda, District- Raigarh (C.G.) ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/0F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA^ °Aevv HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Sinale Bench: Hon*ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Writ Petition (Q No.7328/2009 Petitioner Respondents Versus Uch'rt Ram Rathiya State of Chhattisgarh and others. Shri K.N. Nande, counsel for thepet'rtioner. Shri Sumeet Verma, Panel Lawyer for respondente 1 to 4/State. None appears for respondent No. 5. Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India ORAL ORDER (13.01,2810) In this writ pet'rtion filed under Article 227 of the Const'rtution of India, the pet'rtioner has called in question the legality, validity and propriety of the order dated 23.11.2009 passed by Collector, Raigarh in review petition filed by the petftioner. The said order is revisabie before the Director. Panchayat under Section 91 of Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam,1993 read w'rth Ruies 3 & 4 of Chhattisgarh Panchayat Appeal and Revision Rules 1993. In vlew of the existence of aftemative remedy, leamed counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to fde appropriate proceedings before Director, Panchayat. He prays that certlfied copy of Order dated 23.11.^)09 passed by Cotlector, Raigarh may kindly be retumed, so that he may prefer appropriate proceedings before Director, Panchayat. Office is directed to retain the photo copy of the order dated 23.11.2009 (Annexure-P/5) passed by Collector, Raigarh and to return the original to the counsel for the pet'rtioner. The writ petition is dismissed as w'rthdrawn. Certified copy as per rules. —— Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Bim