{1} W.P.8595/10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.8595 OF 2010 Dattatraya Kondaji Jadhav Petitioner Versus Vijay Jagannath Bhalinge and others Respondents Mr.G.B.Rajale, advocate for petitioner Mr.P.P.More, A.G.P. for respondent no.3 CORAM : R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 30 th November, 2010 PER COURT: 1 The Revision tendered by the petitioner raising challenge to the orders passed by the authorities below in respect of recording of mutation entries has been turned down and said order is subjected to challenge in this petition. 2 It is well established that revenue entries are recorded for fiscal purposes and those, in themselves, are not the evidence of title or entitlement of the parties in relation to the property in question. The revenue entries are required to be corrected or recorded in consonance with determination of rights of the parties by the competent Civil Court. The orders passed by the revenue authorities in respect of revenue entries shall be subject to the {2} W.P.8595/10 decision of the Civil Court in pending Civil litigation. In this view of the matter, no interference is required to be caused. 3 Writ Petition stands rejected. R.M.BORDE JUDGE adb/wp859510