1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.5665 OF 2007 (Radheshyam Devikisanji Sikchi vs. Sant Gadgebaba Amravati University and others) ___________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 5, 2007 Heard Shri Patil, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Shri Sadar, learned Counsel holding for Shri Kothale, learned Counsel for the respondent nos.1 and 2. Shri Patil, learned Counsel for the petitioner, states that petitioner has made representation dated 23.11.2007 for redressal of his grievance to the respondent no.1 Vice Chancellor, Sant Gadgebaba Amravati University, Amravati. However, petitioner has not been communicated any decision in this regard and, therefore, direction may 2 be issued to the respondent no.1. Shri Sadar, learned Counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2, states that if respondent no.1 Vice Chancellor is competent to consider the said representation and has not decided the same earlier, appropriate decision according to law would be taken at the earliest. In view of the above referred statement made by the learned Counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2, cause of action in the petition does not survive. Hence, petition is disposed of as infructuous. JUDGE JUDGE khj