CLR No.21 of 2009 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, Advocate for the revisionist. Mr. N.S. Negi, Advocate for the respondents. In my opinion, the present revision u/S 115 of the C.P.C. is not maintainable. An order rejecting the application u/S 5 of the Limitation Act in an appeal is appealable u/S 100 of the C.P.C. in view of the decision in Smt. Geeta Bala Goyal and another Vs. Shri Kailash Chandra and others, (2009) 2 ALJ 657. The revision is dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 11.05.2010 Shiv