CWP(T) No. 2343/2008 (OA 2761/94) 20.04.2010 Present: Mr. S. S. Sood, Advocate, vice Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R. K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General with Mr. R. M. Bisht, Deputy Advocate General for respondents/State. According to Mr. R. K. Sharma, learned Sr. Addl. Advocate General the matter in issue is squarely covered by a decision rendered by this Court on 13.3.2009 in CWP(T) No. 2346 of 2008, titled as Shri Madan Gopal versus The State of H.P. and another. The petitioner in the instant case is similarly situated. Hence the present petition needs to be allowed and the relief accorded to the other similarly situated petitioners is also to be accorded to him. In the aforesaid decision this Court had passed the following directions: “Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 7.8.1992, Annexure A-6 is quashed and set aside. The respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner on the analogy of the decree passed by the learned Sub Judge Ist Class, Hoshiarpur up held by the Punjab & Haryana High Court within a period of eight weeks from today. The petitioner will be held entitled to all consequential benefits. No costs.” In view of the above it is directed that the present petitioner shall also be entitled to the same benefits. Present petition is as such disposed of. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. April 20, 2010 (PK)