1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION A.O.NO. 1241/2008 WITH C.A.NO.1514/2008 Dilip Vrajlal Shah Appellant Vs. Garware Club House & Ors. Respondents Mr.Anil Singh i/b Shri.Dhanesh R.Shah advocate for the appellant Mr.P.K.Samdani,Sr.Counsel with Mr.C.D.Mehta ,Mr.Darshan R.Mehta i/b M/s Dhruve Liladhar & Co.for Res.1,2 & 4 Mr.R.K.Mehta i/b M/s RKM Legal Services for Res.no.3 Mr.Vishal Phal i/b M/s Thakordas Madgaonkar for Intervener CORAM: S.J.VAZIFDAR,J. DATE : 5th December,2008 P.C. 1] I do not for a moment suggest that the contentions raised on behalf of the appellant are without any substance as to the interpretation of the rules or as to the conduct of respondent no.2, the Vice President, who has taken the impugned decision. Despite the same I do not intend interfering with the electoral process which has already been set in motion . There are a few marginal areas as a result whereof it cannot be said that this is entirely open and shut case. 2] This is however,one of the rare cases where I would request the trial Court to decide the suit as expeditiously as possible . 2 The written statement shall be filed within four weeks . Affidavit of documents within four weeks thereafter. Discovery and inspection forthwith thereafter. 3] The parties shall not seek any adjournment before the trial Court except in compelling circumstances. 4] Needless to add the appellant will be entitled to amend the plaint after the results of the elections are declared. A.O. and C.A. are disposed of accordingly.