^\0-6 ••/• IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. fSl N0. ^L('^—/2007 PETITIONER ./A' ^^"' Avw <^^y /^'lx"'1 ^" .<>• :J$^mal Singh Painkara S/o. Shri Sadhram Painkara '^". . . .c"" Aged about 44 years Post-Assistant Teacher R/o. Village -Birtarai, Tahsil Kartala & District Korba (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS f^y^ ^/^. ^ :1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2,, District Education Officer, Korba District Raigarh (C.G.) 3. WRIT PETITION Block Education Officer Block-Kartala District.-Korba (C.G.) U/A 226' OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIR^CTIONS HE6H COURT OF CMHATn.SGAW AT BILASPUR W. P, fS) No. 942 of 2007 Petitioner ; Kamal 5ingh Painkara Versus Req)ondents State of Chhattisgarh & olhers ~^\ Single Bcnch: Hon^te Mr. Justice SaMsh K. Aydhotri. Mr. Anil Mourya, Adwcate for Ihe Petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panet Lawyer for the State/reqiondents. ORDER 0>assed on this 20th tXiy of Februwy, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearin9 for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is workmg as Assistant Teadier in •the Sovemment Boys Aashram School Birtarui. Block-Kartah. District-Korba The petitioner has obtained B.Ed. Examination certificdte in the year 1987, on his own expenses. 2. Leamed counset appearing for •the petitioner submits that the question involved, herein asto whether the teacher, who obtained B.Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses, is entitled to two advance increments. 3. According to teamed counsel for Ihe petitioner, tiie petitioner is entitted to two advonce increments in view of the deciswn of •rtiis Court- in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadunij Vs. Municipal Corporotion. Durg and another {2006 CII) MPJR-C6 96}. This Court' in Ihe case of yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Munic4wl Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), came to the conclusion that the teachers, who had obtained B. Ed. /B.T.I. Examination Certificate on their own expenses, are covered by -the circular dated 24.12.98 issued by the State Sovemment of Madhya Pradesh. Leamed counsel for the petitioner further submits that the facts and question of law involved in Ihe present case are squarety covered by decision of •this Court- in •the case of Vashwant Kuincu* Bharadwa| Vs. rtunicipal Corporotion. Ourg and another (Supro), to t»hich leamed counsel appearing for the resfsondents fairly concedes and agrees with the overment nuide by leamed coimset oppearing for the petitioner. Accordingly. the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in -the case of Vashwcuit Kumar Bharadwflj Vs. rtunicipal Corporation. Durg and anotter (Supro), subject to verification of •the foct as to whether the petitioner has ottquired B.Ed. Examination Cert'ificate on his own expenses as per the circukirs dated 24.12.1998 & 1.3.1999 ond further whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Subhash Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge