1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. / é / /200V WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. Chhotelal Khanna, aged about 45 years, son of Shri Sudharam Khanna, Assistant Teacher, Government Primary School Bhelwadih, Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through — Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner, Deptt of Tribal Welfare Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) PETITIONER g @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI$GARH AT BILASPUR w, us) No. 117 of 2007 Pefi'fioners : Mmsingh Khande and o‘thzrs Versus Respondents i State of Chharrisgarh and afhers w‘ P,(5) No‘ 118 of 2007 Pefi'tioners : Tejram Bhagnt and ofhers Versus Respondenw : State of Chhnttisgarh and others w, P,($) No. 121 of 2007 smjay num- 5mm Petitioner Versus Mondants : State of Chhattisgarh Md another W, P,(S) No, 126 of 2007 W, P.($) No, 127 of 2007 Petitioner : Kulranjan Ekka Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and others W, P,(5l No, 128 of 2007 Petitioner : Sm‘i’. Bhar‘ti Bai Versus Respondents 2 State of Chhattisgarh and another W, P,($) No, 129 of 2007 Petitioner : Philos Akdmay Mukut Tigga Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and mother W, P,(_$) No. 130 of 2007 ’ Petitioner : Smt. Prasadi Bhagot Versus mondents : State of Chhattisgarh and another Petitioner : Bhuvnedwwar Pmsad Pmdhan Versus Respondents z State of Chhattisgarh and others W. P.(5_) No; 131 of 2007 ' Sagar Sci Versus Petitioner Responderws 2 State of Chha‘tfisgarh and o‘rhers \ W. P.($) No, 133 of 2007 Pe111‘ioner : Inus Bek Versus Rewondents : State of Chhattisgarh and another W. P.(S) No. 134 of 2007 Petitioner : Balirom Bhagat Versus Respondents : State of Chhottisgarh and another w, us) No. 135 of 2007 Petitioner : Avinash Chandra Xalco Versus Respondents : State of Chhottisgarh and others w, us) No. 136 of 2007 Petitioner : Smt. Shashikola Bhagat Versus Respondents 2 State of Chhattisgarh and mother W, P',(S) No. 137 of 2007 Petitioner : Chhondurom Bhagat Versus Re¢ondents : State of Chhattisgarh and another W. P,(5) No, 139 of 2007 Petitioner : Ku. Clementina Tigga I Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and another W. P.(5) No. 145 of 2007 Petitioner : Kridma Ram Patel Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and others W. P,(S) No, 147 of 2007 Versus Versus Pefifioner : Laxmimmyan Patel Versus Rzspondenfs : - Shh of Chhaftisgarh and ano‘fher W, P.(5) No. 149 of 2007 ’7 Petitioner , : Sm‘r. Maxi Miliyani Toppo Versus Respondzms : 51am of Chhaffisgnrh and another k W. P,($) No, 150 of 2007 xPe1'i‘rioner : Smt. Rnjmohi Rewondem's : Sm‘te of Chhuffisgarh and others W, P,($) No. 151 of 2007 Petitionzr : Chomru Rom Nogdeo Respondenfs : Sfo‘te of Chhn‘tfisgorh and afhers W. P.(5) No. 159 of 2007 Pe‘l‘i‘l’ioner : Gonedm Ram Prodhan Versus Rewonden'rs : Sfo‘l’e'of Chha‘l’fisgorh and mo‘ther W. P.(S) No. 161 of 2007 Petitioner : Chhotelai Khonna Versus v Respondents : State of Chhottisgarh and another W. P.($) No, 165 of 2007 W, P.($) No. 168 of 2007 Petitioner : Brijmohon Nayok Respondents : State of Chhottisgorh and another Versus Petitioner : Romkumar Choudhori ' Versus Respondents : State of Chhottisgorh and another And SB: Hon'bk Mr. Justice Sa‘fish K. Agniho’fri, J Present: ' Mr. A.N.‘ Bhakta, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mrs. Anju Ahuju, Depuiy Government Advocdfe, Mr. Arvind DuEey, Panel Lawyer, Ms. Smite Jain, Panel Lawyer for 1he ’mspondenrs/Smfe; r >0RDER (Passed on this 17'“ Day af January, 2007) L 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the Stare/respondenfs jointiy sJbmi'f 1haf fhe facts of the present writ petitions are similar to that of in W. P. (5) No. 5976/2006 (Sushi! Tiwari and others vs. State Government of Chhattisgorh & others), which was allowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. They further submit that the question of iaw involved is also the same. 2. In view of the above-stated slbmissions made by learned counsel for ‘the parties, these writ petitions are allowed in terms of the order dated 7.11.2006 passed by this Court in W.P. (5.) No. 5976/2006 :{Sud'iil Tiwari and others vs. State- Government of Chhattisgarh & others). No order as to costs. g. 'A copy of this order be placed on record in other connected writ petition. Subhash Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge