THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition Nos.6143 and 12140 of 2010 Dated 18th October, 2011 Between: Sri T.G.Venkata Krishna …Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary for Municipal Administration and Urban Development, Hyderabad and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri R.Raghunandan Counsel for respondent No.1: AGP for Municipal Administration Counsel for respondent Nos.2 & 3: Sri G.Ramachandra Reddy The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petitions are taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. W.P.No.6143 of 2010 is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to grant an order, direction or writ, more so in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the inaction of the first respondent in considering and passing orders on my application dated 03.01.2009 as illegal, arbitrary, highhanded and violative of Articles 14 and 19 of Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondents to take steps to consider my application dated 03.01.2009 for allotment of shops bearing Nos.3 and 31 in the Commercial Complex constructed by the second respdonent at Rayala Cheruvu Road, Tirupathi for a period of 99 years without payment of rent.” W.P.No.12140 of 2010 is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to grant an order, direction or writ, more so in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the third respondent, putting a stipulation that the petitioner should withdraw the proceedings pending in A.S.No.119/2008 for handing over shop Nos.3 and 31 in the Commercial Complex constructed by the second respondent in Rayala Cheruvu Road, Tirupathi vide proceedings bearing ROC No.384/C2/04 dated 28.04.2010 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to handover shop Nos.3 and 31 in the Commercial Complex constructed by the second respondent at Rayala Cheruvu Road, Tirupathi without insisting of withdrawal of litigation pending in A.S.No.119/2008.” At the hearing, Sri R.Raghunandan, learned counsel for the petitioner who is common in both the writ petitions, seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petitions with liberty to his client to file a comprehensive writ petition in order to question the order of the Government in Lr.No.18554/H2/2009, dated 04.07.2009, and G.O.Ms.No.1434, Municipal Administration and Urban Development (H2) Department, dated 14.10.2008. This request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a comprehensive writ petition. If the petitioner has paid all the arrears without any default, the interim order granted in W.P.No.6143 of 2010 shall continue for a period of two weeks. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petitions, the interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 18th October, 2011 VGB