COCP No.2157 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.O.C.P.No.2157 of 2008 Date of Decision:-19.8.2009 Hashni Kumar ...Petitioner Versus Smt.Romila Dubey and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Mr.Ravi Kapur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): In response to the show cause notice issued by this Court, separate replies on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2 have been filed. In the reply filed on behalf of respondent No.1, it has been submitted that in compliance of the order dated 20.3.2007 passed in CWP No.13147 of 1991, the Commissioner, Jalandhar Division, Jalandhar passed the final orders vide Annexures RI to RIV (attached with the reply of respondent No.1) exonerating the four Naib Tehsildars, who were appointed by adopting dubious means. It has been further stated that respondent No.1 suo-motu reviewed the orders (Annexures RI to RIV) of the Commissioner disagreeing with the same and had again charge sheeted the aforesaid four Naib Tehsildars for inflicting major punishment and a new Inquiry Officer has been appointed to submit its report within three months. COCP No.2157 of 2008 2 It has been further submitted by Mr.M.C.Berry, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab that however, the orders passed by respondent No.1 have been stayed by this Court vide order dated 30.3.2009 passed in CWP No.5003 of 2009 and other connected writ petitions. In view of the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to proceed further with this petition. Rule discharged. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek any other appropriate remedy in accordance with law for redressal of his grievances. 19.8.2009 (Rakesh Kumar Garg) AS Judge