IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN ITS ADMIRALTY AND VICE ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION IN ITS ADMIRALTY AND VICE ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION IN ITS ADMIRALTY AND VICE ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION ADMIRALTY SUIT NO.5 OF 2005 ADMIRALTY SUIT NO.5 OF 2005 ADMIRALTY SUIT NO.5 OF 2005 Ruchi Worldwide Ltd. ..Plaintiff versus m.v."PATCHARA NAREE" ..Defendant. Mr.S.R.Vernekar i/b. A.M.Vernekar for the plaintiff. Mr.Kunal Shah i/b. Bhatt & Saldhana for the Defendants. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Dated : 16th Dec., 2005 Dated : 16th Dec., 2005 Dated : 16th Dec., 2005 P.C. 1. Both the learned Advocates present. They tender the consent terms. Parties are present before the Court. The parties agree to have compromised the matter as per the consent terms. Consent terms taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. 2. Draw decree in terms of the consent terms. 3. Issue necessary Court Fee Refund Certificate as per rules in the name of the plaintiff. 4. The learned Advocate for plaintiff submits that Commissioner was appointed his this matter. However, as the consent terms are filed, the Commissioner is discharged.