: 1 : HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.483 OF 2003. SECOND APPEAL NO.483 OF 2003. SECOND APPEAL NO.483 OF 2003. Sonappa Govind Sutar ..Appellants Versus Manu Subrao Navagekar ..Respondent Mr.Rahul S. Kate for the appellants CORAM: S.R.SATHE, J. CORAM: S.R.SATHE, J. CORAM: S.R.SATHE, J. DATE : 21st JUNE, 2005 DATE : 21st JUNE, 2005 DATE : 21st JUNE, 2005 P.C. 1. The suit for declaration and injunction filed by the Original Plaintiff was dismissed by the trial Court. Being agrieved the Plaintiff filed the first appeal in which the finding of the lower Court was confirmed holding that the plaintiff has failed to prove his case that he has become owner by adverse possession. It has been also held by the First Appellate Court that the Plaintiff has failed to prove possesion of the suit land. The finding of fact with regard to this point has not been challenged. There is nothing on record to indicate that the said finding is not based on the evidence on record or that there is any perversity in the said finding. The First Appellate Court has also taken into consideration the finding recorded by the Revenue Authorities. No substantial question of law is involved in the matter. Hence this appeal is dismissed in limini. : 2 : (S.R.SATHE, J.)