(^^ \vo ^ -1- tti^teBNidl In the Hon'ble Hish Court of Chhattishsarh at Bilaspur (C.G.) /^" W.P,(S)No. ^.^~6 2008' Petitioner ... ... ....••-° ^'""^ > )-b:'%-%.- ^y^jy" f""^L.'"••'" tM>-"' .-SL,'" y?-' (B'*', ^' t«/' Respondents Smt. Rinku Chakravorty aged 45 years Wife ofShriSujit Chakravorty, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Anjora, District Durg (C.G.) Versus ^ 1. State ofChhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, School Education Department Ministiy, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) ••s'g 2. Secretary, Tribal Development Department, D.K.S. Bhavm, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Secretary, School Education Department Ministry. Vallabh Bhavan, Bhopal (M.P.) Writ petitjon under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of mandamus/direction or anv other apDropriate writ 3Tlt?I qil ft=!W ?[m sn^i-anR; ^S[ ^)|q|0<<, ©olyiS,MWI'Hy 1^^?,)N^..&6T&/ 3Trt¥iTPRT(' •B^iiwHtesn^i {SB^ Hon'bl^ Shri iyisnindrs WQ\ 22-08-2010 Sh" Somkant Verma, counsel Shrl Vinod Tekam, Panei Lawl With the consent of the oartlel 'tHw^l^ ^wrff ii feA <r»i*ii< ^sifimsn^i ^^^•^^ ^ f i^ isn s?nnv3siav^3 -j,j ^y forthe Detitioner. [ie'{ for the State. The petitioner has fited thi| respondents to conslder her cas^ Department as per the Circular dAted ab<>ve Learned counse! for the simiiarly situated teachers have absorption in the light of the Petition (S) No. 6437/2008 Govt. of Chhattisgrh & others)] dated 19.11.2008, wherein the p^ detailed representation before th| Srievances, who, in turn, shal merits, in acordancew v/ith law, ir< within a psriod of six weeks representation. He prays that sim| Learned counsel appearing foj to the above submission made petitioner. 1 cdns , the matter is heard finaliy. . petitlon seeking a direction to the for absorption in the Schooi Education 3.1.2006 (Annexure P-3). submits that the services of jlready been considered by the State for Circular. He submits that ths Writ fchan Lai Pate! and others Vs. State |was disposed off by this Court by order ^tltioners were granted liberty to make a respondent No.1 for redressai of their iider and decid®ths same on its own 1 the light of the Circular dated 13.1.1995 |from the date of the receipt of the |Iar order may be passed. the respondents/State has no objection by learned counse! appearing for the -4- "'"''ii ii,:1,, ;?"., *i? : f A Xl-HC—'i •^sf -4i<4H^, ^tilyMs, r«<ciiyy,< \^.^) pn.&4F^/L^^ 31I^I'EPR7 (' ?i:n^i ^i! ^fN? •CTqianinWTO; Tumane ^R'IWHto'ffl^I —2-- <<>wi<-f^-) W^vS tt fe^ <R>]«1< ^affinsn^i Having regard to the facts si' disposed off with liberty to the peli before the respondent No.1 for rji shall consider and decide the sarine !aw, in the light of the above stalji from the date of the receipt of the) tuation of t&e case, this petition stands jtioner to make a detaiied representation ^dressa! of her grievance, who, In turn, on its own merits, in accordance with pd circutar, within a period of six weeks |representation. No order as to costs. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge