IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY VPH CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No. 1391 OF 2008 Pandurang Vinayak Deokar Petitioner (Through Jail) Vs. The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mrs. A. S. Pai, APP, for the respondent. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI, & A. A. KUMBHKONI, JJ. DATE : JULY 22, 2008. PC :- 1. The application of the petitioner for furlough leave has been rejected on the ground that in the year 2005 when he was granted concession, he overstayed by one day and in the year 2006 again when he was granted concession he overstayed by 45 days. The learned public prosecutor states that by mistake it came to be mentioned 45 days, but actually the petitioner has overstayed by 15 days. In this view of the matter, we set aside the impugned order and direct the respondent to consider the application of the petitioner afresh and pass appropriate order. Petition is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- [ BILAL NAZKI, J.] Sd/- [ A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J.]