5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR CHATTISGARH ^-y^ ^•^.^« "!<^t ^••"" RESPONDENT .^! ^> .&•' WRIT PETITION (2271 N0. L/'y/6 /2008 / : Govind Mishra, aged about 32 years, S/o Subhash Chandra Mishra, R7o Anand Nagar, Raipur, Tahasil & District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1) Board ofRevenue, Chattisgarh, Bilaspur. 2) State of Chattisgarh Through - Collector Raipur (C.G.) •^ »^' 3) ' Sanjay Kumar Kanda, S/o Mohanlal Kanda, R/o Noida (U.P.) Through- Aditendra Shukla S/o Ramashankar Shukla, R/o Shankar Nagar Raipur, Tahasil 85 District Raipur (C.G.) 4) Smt Kavita Kanda, W/o Sanjay Kumar Kanda, R/o Noida (U.P.) Through- Aditendra Shukla S/o Ramashankar Shukla, R/o Shankar Nagar Raipur, Tahasil 85 District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ Kw 'Mi HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (227) N0.4816 OF ; Govind Mishra PE.AlNTSFF/REViSSONER ioard" of Chhattisgarh and others WnLPetition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India (Sinaie Bench: Hon'ble Shri N.K. Aaarwal. J.l : Shri Ashish Shrivastava, counsei with Shri Devendra Patel, counse! for the petitiQner. Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri M.L. Sakat, counsel for respondents No. 3 & 4. been (Passed on 14th day of March,2011) Learned counsei for the parties submit thatthe matter has compromised between the parties and the petition has become infructuous. 2. Accordingly, the petition is dismi'ssedas having become ;tuous. Sd/- N.K.Agarwal Judge fj)i;i I'ill