1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5280 OF 2006 Pravin Laxman Patil .. Petitioner. Vs. Smt.Anandi Anant Patil & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.Arvind J. Joshi for the petitioner. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 18TH SEPTEMBER, 2006 DATED : 18TH SEPTEMBER, 2006 DATED : 18TH SEPTEMBER, 2006 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr.Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this writ petition and submits that the petitioner will be satisfied if the directions are given to the appeal court to dispose of the appeal within time frame. Having considered the submissions of Mr.Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner and considering overall facts and circumstances of the case I am satisfied that the following order shall meet the ends of justice: . The appeal court shall decide miscellaneous civil appeal no.31/2006 as expeditiously as possible and preferrably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order on merits in 2 2 2 accordance with law. The orders impugned in the instant writ petition shall remain operative till the disposal of the appeal. . The writ petition is, accordinlgy, disposed of. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)