IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1047 of 2007 SANKATHA PRASAD SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 5.5.2008 The writ petitioner-appellant, aggrieved by the order dated 2.11.2007 passed by the learned Single Judge in C.W.J.C. No. 5226 of 2005 dismissing the writ petition, has preferred this appeal under Clause X of the Letters Patent. Mr.Shivendra Kishore, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that during the pendency of the writ petition and the appeal the grievance of the writ petitioner- appellant has been remedied and his only grievance is non-grant of first and second time bound promotions. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant and Junior counsel to S.C.8 on behalf of the State and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, We are of the opinion, that the writ petitioner-appellant shall be well advised to represent before the Chief Engineer, Rural Engineering Organization, South Range, Patna, respondent no.3 for the redressal of his grievance. Needless to state that in case the writ petitioner-appellant approaches respondent no.3 within six weeks from today, respondent no.3 shall take decision in accordance with law within four months from the date of filing of the representation. In case on consideration of the representation if the petitioner is entitled for the time bound promotions he shall also be entitled to its consequential benefits. This appeal stands disposed off accordingly. Kanth ( C.K.Prasad, A.C.J. ) ( J.N.Singh, J.)