IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 480 (MS) OF 2006 1. Yogesh Nath, S/o Shri Nathi Ram, R/o Vill. & Khadliwala, P.O. – Bhogpur, Gram Sabha, Gadool, Vikashkhand Doilwala,, District-Dehradun. 2. Kedar Singh Rawat, S/0 Chandra Singh Rawat, R/o Village Manki, P.O. Bhogpur, Gram Sabha-Gardool. Vikashkhand Doilwala,, District-Dehradun. …….Petitioners. Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through Secretary (Basic) Education, Dehradun. 2. Additional District Education Officer, Dehradun. 3. Block Education Officer, Block Doiwala, District- Dehradun. 4. Smt. Poonam Manwal, W/o Shri Manjeet Manwal, Village Sangaon, Block Raipur, Distt. Dehradun. ………..Respondents. Mr. Dinesh Gahtori, Adovcate for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents no. 1 to 3. Dated: 03.05.2006 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. By the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to give extension to the respondent no. 4 as Shiksha Mitra in Gram Sabha Gadool Block Doiwala as the respondent no. 4 is neither the resident of Gram Sabha Dadool nor she is resident of Block Raipur and the petitioners may be considered for appointment in the next session. The petitioner has confined his prayer to dispose of the representation, which he has already made on 20.10.2005 (Annexure No. 5 to the writ petition). Without entering into the merit of the controversy, it will be open for the respondents to consider the said representation of the petitioner in accordance with law and decide the same expeditiously within a period of three months. Subject to the aforesaid, writ petition is dismissed. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) 03.05.2006 Rathour