IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16606 of 2010 LAXMAN YADAV . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2/ 18/05/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The defence of the petitioner in a police case under Sections-302 and 120B of Indian Penal Code from the impugned order of rejection is only circumstantial evidence when the F.I.R. primarily suspects his son first who is stated to be already in custody. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with Shankarpur P.S. Case No.63 of 2009, G.R. No.1871 of 2009. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)