IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY THURSDAY, THE 14TH JULY 2011 / 23RD ASHADHA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 1201 of 2011() ------------------------------ CMP.4698/2010 of ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM .................... PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED ------------------------------- DR.FAROOK, AGED 31 YEARS, S/O.M.SHIHABUDHEEN, MEENATTIL KIZHAKKATHIL, THODIYOOR, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.D.AJITHKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): STATE & DEFACTO-COMPLAINANT ------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. MUTHU.U.T, D/O.VIJAYALEKSHMI, UTTOLI HOUSE, ALAGAPPA NAGAR, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR, (NOW RESIDING AT MEENATTIL KIZHAKKETHIL, THODIYOOR, KOLLAM). R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. B. VINOD R2 BY ADV. SMT.LALIZA.T.Y. THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: svs CRMC.NO.1201/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A:COPY OF THE F.I.R. IN CRIME NO.1034/2010 OF MEDICAL COLLEGE POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ANNEXURE B:COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF MARRIAGE UNDER THE SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT; OF THE PETIIONER AND 2ND RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE C:ORIGINAL OF THE AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT ANNEXURE D:COPY OF THE MEMO DATED 04/02/2011 FILED BEFORE THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs B.P.RAY, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.M.C.No.1201 OF 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 14th day of July, 2011 ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. 2. Petitioner has been arrayed as an accused in Crime No.1034 of 2010 of Medical College Police Station registered for the offences punishable under Sections 313, 376 and 419 of the Indian Penal Code. The case is now pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvananthapuram. It is stated by learned counsel for respondent No.2 that the petitioner and second respondent has been married in time and they do not want to proceed with the case. Respondent No.2 shall make a statement by 29th July, 2011 before the aforementioned court to the effect that she had married the petitioner and she does not want to proceed with the case. If the Magistrate is satisfied that the petitioner and the second respondent have married and the matter has been settled between the parties, learned Magistrate shall close the case. Criminal M.C. is disposed of. B.P.RAY, JUDGE jes