IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated : Nainital the 29th March, 2011 Order on the bail application of accused 1st Bail Application No. 228 of 2011 CRIMINAL SIDE Shyam Singh S/o Hardev R/o C-458, New Colony, Kalagarh, District Pauri Garhwal …Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …Opposite Party Arising out of Case Crime No. 120 of 2010 Under Sections 363/366 I.P.C. P.S. Kalagarh District Pauri Garhwal Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. D.C.S. Rawat, the learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. T.C. Agarwal, the learned A.G.A. for the State. The applicant has a similar role with the other co-accused who have already been enlarged on bail. The applicant’s son and Namita Joshi have eloped and they are still at large and have not been caught by the police so far. The mere fact that the applicant is the father of the boy does not mean that he is involved in the alleged abduction. In view of the fact that co-accused having similar role have already been enlarged on bail, the applicant is also entitled to be given a similar treatment. The bail application is allowed. Let the applicant be released on bail in connection with Case Crime No. 120 of 2010, under Sections 363/366 I.P.C., P.S. Kalagarh, District Pauri Garhwal, on executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 29.03.2011 SP