IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 28TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 28732 of 2008(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------- LIMNA MANUEL, AGED 23 YEARS,D/O.MANUEL, KOTTAPPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHERANALLUR VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.A.X.VARGHESE SRI.A.V.JOJO SMT.ANJU JAHAFER SMT.C.R.SOBHANA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,(RURAL)ALUVA. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERNAKULAM NORTH POLICE STATION. 3. JEEVAN JOSEPH, AGED 33 YEARS, S/O.JOSEPH, MOOLAMKUZHIYIL HOUSE, NEENDAKARA, ERAMALLUR VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 4. DENNY, S/O.JOSEPH, MOOLAMKUZHIYIL HOUSE, NEENDAKARA, ERAMALLUR VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY GOVT.PLEADER SHRI SALIM P.A. FOR R1 & R2 ADV. SRI.M.G.KARTHIKEYAN FOR R3& 4 SRI.NIREESH MATHEW FOR R3 & 4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.(C)No.28732/08 PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT.P1: TRUE COPIES OF THE BILLS FROM THE LOURD HOSPITAL. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 17.9.08. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT. TRUE COPY K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ----------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.28732 OF 2008 U ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 19th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2008 J U D G M E N T Balakrishnan Nair, J. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking appropriate direction to the police to protect her life in the wake of the alleged threat from the part of the 3rd respondent, who is her husband and the 4th respondent, who is the brother of the 3rd respondent. 2. The learned Government Pleader upon instructions submitted that both the parties were summoned to the Police Station and respondents 3 and 4 were strictly warned, not to threaten or create any problem for the petitioner. 3. The respondents 3 and 4 have filed a counter affidavit in which it is submitted that they have no intention whatsoever to harm the petitioner in any way. In view of the above submission and also the submission of the learned Government Pleader, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Writ Petition can be closed. In view of the above submissions made by both sides, the Writ Petition is closed. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE. dsn