IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.42900 OF 2009 VIMAL PASWAN, SON OF SRI LAXMI PAWAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KANCHANPUR, P.S. BIDUPUR, DISTRICT VAISHALI VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 21.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The case is under sections 25(1-b)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. It is stated that one country made pistol and one live cartridge was recovered from possession of the petitioner. Petitioner is in jail since 1.1.2009. It is stated that there is only one case against petitioner from before in respect of some village dispute and not in any way connected with any professional crime. Except for the said case, it is stated that petitioner has no other criminal antecedents. Considering the above facts and circumstances, this application is allowed. Let petitioner (Vimal Paswan) be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali in connection Gangabridge P.S. Case no.01/09 with conditions as laid down - 2 - in sub-section (3) of section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as may be applicable and also that one of the bailors shall be a close relation of the petitioner. In case of breach of any of the conditions at any stage to the satisfaction of the concerned court below, it shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner and take steps for his arrest. B.T (J. N. Singh, J.)