HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH : BILASRUR WRIT PETITION (SVNO. 4105 OF 2008 PETITIONERS -ff- RESPONDENTS 1. Ku. Padmini, D/o Shri Jhwrakhan Lal, ag©* about 23 ysara, Shiksha Karmi Grade-lll,i Govt. Primary School, Mehana, Btpclc Nawagarh, R/o yiliage Kiindani, Ppst Darra, Tehsil (Surur, Distt. Durg (CG). 2. Manjusha Bai, D/o Shri Induram, aged about 27 years, Shiksha Karmi Grade-111, Govt. Primary Schopl, Nandal, Block Nawagarh, R/o vHlage Nevrikala, Tehsil Balod.Distt. Durg (CQ). 3. Balmukund, S/o Shri Pitambar.aged about 25 years, Shiksha Karmi Grade-111, Govt. Primary School; Beltukari, Block Nawagarh, R/o village Kumbhabori, Rost Koba, Tehsil Ooundilohara, Distt. Durg 4. Bhunsswar .Singh Dhanendra; S/o Shri Lakhanla!, aged about 33 years, Shiksha Karmi Grade-111, Gdvt. Primary Sehdol, Dhawarabhatakala, Block Nawagarh, R/o village Atargaon, Teshil Doundilohara, Distt.Durg (CG). ' 5, Dhan Bai Nagendra, D/0 Shri Ganesh Ram Nagendra, aged about 23 years, Shjteha Karmi Grade-111, Govt. Primary Schoo!, Narayanpur, Biock Nawagarh, R/o viilage Dadaidih, P.S. Arjunda, Distt.Durg '(0(3).- ; • : , '1 .1 ; 6 Panna Lal Mandavi, S/o Bahur Singh, aged about 33 years, Sbiksha Karmi Grade-llt, Govt. Primary Schbol, Dhawrabhatakala, Biock Nawagarh, R/o village Atargaon, Tehsil Doundilohara, Distt.Durg(CG). 7. Laleswar Prasad Sahu, S/b Chirwanjilal Sahu, aged about 24 years, Shiksha Karmi Grade-111, Govt. Primary School, Rushe, Block Nawagarh, Teh. Gurur, t.Durg(CG); ^ Versus ': , ' •1 11 . • :.', 1. Stafe of Ghhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Panchayat & Rui-al Deveioprnent, D.K.S.. Bhavan, Raipur (CG). . 2. The Collector, Durg, District Durg (CG). 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad PanehayatNawagarh, Distt. Durg.(CG). 4. Board of Secondary School; through the Secretary, Raipur, Distt. Raipuri(CC3) w,- -'L- ^^ Thakur (Writ petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitufion oflndia) Singte Bench: Hon'ble Shri Sati.sh K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri V.K. Pandey, counsel for the petjtioners. ~ ^ Shri YashwanS Singh Thakur, Dy. Advocate General for the State. ORALORDER (Passed on this 29th dayof Jufy, 2008) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitionersseeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with iiberty to take recourse of the alternative forum that may be available to the petitioners, ifso advised. 2) Leamed counsel for the State has no objectiqn to the ahove submissjon. 3) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismjssed as wlthdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- ^SW"'^MM Jf.'