1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 682 OF 2010 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6692 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1457 OF 1988 Rangnath Genuji Gaikwad and Ors. ... Applicants Versus Devidas Digambar Purandare ... Respondents Mr. Uday Warunjikar, Advocate for applicant. Mr. Sandeep Goyal i/by M/s. Mulla & Mulla & C.B. & C., Advocate for respondent. CORAM : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J. DATED : OCTOBER 15, 2010 P.C. This Civil Application is filed for restoration of Civil Application No. 6692 of 2007 which was filed for restoration of above First Appeal which was dismissed for default on 12th June, 2009. Perusal of the record shows that after the First Appeal was filed in the year 1988, untill the year 2007 no steps are taken by the applicant herein for removal of office 2 objections. Therefore, on 13.7.2007 First Appeal was placed on the board for orders. On that date applicant was given four weeks time to remove office objections. The order on that date further states that on failure to remove office objections the appeal stall stand dismissed without further reference to the court. Unfortunately the applicant did not remove office objections, even after this warning by the court. Consequently First Appeal came to be dismissed. Perusal of Civil Application No. 6692 of 2007 filed for restoration of First Appeal shows that the applicant has yet to remove the office objections. There is no averment made in the Civil Application that the office objections have since been removed. This case discloses gross state of facts where the applicant has been utterly negligent in attending to the matter since the filing of the First Appeal in the year 1988. The negligence extends to attendance to Civil Application filed for restoration also. Hence, Civil Application is dismissed. No order as to costs. (SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J.)