IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27402 of 2010 HARUN NADAF, S/o Late Bhgrul Nadaf. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 13.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 504, 379 and 448/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that there is no specific overt act against the petitioner and specific overt act is against co-accused Anuwarul Nadaf, let the petitioner, above named who claims to be seventy years of age be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-VII, Sitamarhi in connection with S.Tr. No. 617 of 2006 arising out of Bathnaha P.S. Case No. 81 of 2003 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the 2 petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The fact that the petitioner is an accused in only two other cases besides the present one will be verified by the Magistrate concerned before releasing the petitioner on bail. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)