MC 349/2010 BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Mr Sarma, learned counsel for the applicant. None appears on behalf of th e Opposite Party. The instant application is for condonation of delay of 109 days in filin g the accompanying appeal. Whereas, in the application for condonation of delay the applicant in substance, projects the plea of unavoidable official formalit ies, the Opposite party Nos 1,2 and 3 in their affidavit in opposition pleaded vagueness thereof and sought rejection of the petition on that plea. The applicant in his affidavit in reply filed on 12.1.2011 (registered as Misc C ase No.185/2011) has provided the details stage-wise of the essential facts and particulars substantiating the averments made in the application.It appears th at the delay has been adequately explained. In the above view of the matter, having regard to the pleadings bearing on the aspect of condonation of delay as prayed for, in the opinion of this Cour t, the prayer for condonation of delay ought to be allowed. Ordered accordingly. Misc case stands allowed.