IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38989 of 2008 SURESH PRASAD YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 24/9/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This Court is not persuaded to entertain this renewed prayer for anticipatory bail in a case under Sections- 406, 409 and 420/er of I.P.C. on allegations of defalcation of Government funds on the submission that he is willing to deposit half of the amount in question considering which subsequently co-accused has been enlarged on anticipatory bail. The application is dismissed. If the petitioner surrenders before the court below with the proof of deposit of Rs.24,000/- in Government treasury and the court below is satisfied about the correctness of the same, his application for regular bail shall be considered on merits, without being prejudiced by the present order. KC ( Navin Sinha,J )