IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 6706 of 2010 Date of decision: 25.10.2010. Umesh Sharma ….. Petitioner. Vs. State of H.P. & ors. …. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the Petitioner : Mr. Pushpinder Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. K.B.Khajuria, Advovcate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J.K.Verma, Dy. Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 3. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: That the writ in the nature of mandamus may be issued and the respondents be directed to correct the answer key and revised the merit list accordingly and offer the appointment to the petitioner as the number of vacancies of TGT (A) are available with the respondent department. 2. The petitioner has sought for writ of mandamus. It is stated that no action on his representation has so far been taken. Therefore, without expressing any opinion as to the merits of the case this writ petition is disposed of directing the third respondent to take appropriate action on Annexure P-3 representation, if not already taken, within a period of two months from the date of - 2 - production of a copy of this judgement alongwith a copy of writ petition by the petitioner. 3. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. October 25, 2010 (Justice Kuldip Singh), (Hem) Judge.