IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No. M-3745 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 1.8.2011 Pawan Kumar and another .....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab & another ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. Harshit Jain, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Jasdev Singh Brar, AAG, Punjab for the respondent – State. Mr. Vikas Sagar, Advocate, for respondent No.2. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) By this petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioners seek quashing of First Information Report (for short 'FIR) No. 182 dated July 30 th, 2008, under Sections 323 and 324 read with Section 34 of of Indian Penal Code, Police Station City Sangrur, District Sangrur. 2. By order dated February 7 th, 2011, Daya Chaudhary, J. directed the parties to appear before the trial Court and trial Court was directed to record their statements. In compliance with the order of this Court, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangrur recorded the statements of the parties, whereby they have stated that they have compromised the matter. They have also tendered compromise-deed (Annexure P-2). Indeed, the dispute between the parties was of personal nature. In view of this, there should not be any impediment in allowing the parties to compromise the matter. Support to this view can be had from the authority 'Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab' 2008 (2) RCR (Criminal) 429, wherein, Hon'ble Supreme Court has ruled that in such type of cases, where the dispute is of personal nature, Court should ordinarily, accept the compromise. Criminal Misc. No. M- 3745 of 2011 -2- .. 3. In view of the above, the petition is accepted, FIR No.182 dated July 30 th, 2008, under Sections 323 and 324 read with Section 34 of of Indian Penal Code, Police Station City Sangrur, District Sangrur and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed. (NAWAB SINGH) JUDGE 01.08.2011 som