HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA8PLTR S.B. : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. WMT PETITION (S) No. RESPONDENTS Smt. L.K.Luthra, W/o Shri Ajit Singh Luthra , Aged about 46 years, R/o Gondpara Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through:- Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director of School Education D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education ofScer , Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) Present: Shri Kumaresh Tiwari, Advocate for tfae petitioner. Shri Vinay Pandey, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. (Passed on 21st ofMa:ch, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the fact and question of iaw involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in Yashwant Kiunar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, KrZ Durg and another {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 03.042006. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents does not controvert the said submission. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Mumcipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whelfaer the petitioner has acquired M.Ed. Examination Certificate on her own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and forther whether she has been paid two advance mcrements or not. No order as to costs. Aimt Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge