1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.1600 OF 2005 Sayyed Iqbal Babumiya ..Appellant Vs. Smt.Shantabai Shankarrao Tungar and ors. ..Respondents ......... Mr.V.Z.Kankaria, for appellant. Mr.R.A.Thorat, for respondent nos.2 and 4. Ms.Pratibha Shelake, for respondent nos.3 and 5. ......... CORAM: R.G.KETKAR, J. DATE : 1st JULY, 2010. P.C. : Not on board. Mentioned. 2] Heard Mr.V.Z.Kankaria, learned counsel for the appellant, Mr.R.A.Thorat, learned counsel for the respondent nos.2 and 4 and Ms.Pratibha Shelake, learned counsel for the respondent nos.3 and 5. 3] The respondent no.1 is reported to have expired. Respondent nos.2 to 5 are the heirs and legal representatives of the respondent no.1. The parties have amicably settled the dispute and have tendered the consent terms. The consent terms are taken on record and marked as “X” for identification. 4] The appellant is present in the court. The respondent no.2 who is also 1600-05.sxw 2 the power of attorney holder of the respondent nos.3 to 5, is present. The consent terms are signed by the appellant as also by the respondent no.2 for himself and as power attorney holder of the respondent nos.3 to 5. Appellant and respondent no.2 admit the correctness of the consent terms. 5] After hearing learned counsel for the parties and after going through the consent terms, I am satisfied that the suit can be adjusted wholly by compromise in writing and signed by the parties. I order compromise to be recorded. 6] Second Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the consent terms with no order as to the costs. [R.G. KETKAR, J.] 1600-05.sxw