IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. 48141-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION : 04.09.2006 State of Punjab .... PETITIONER Versus Anupam Devgan ..... RESPONDENT CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. N.S. Gill, AAG, Punjab, for the petitioner. * * * The State of Punjab has filed this petition under Section 439 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the respondent vide order dated 21.4.2005, passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, in FIR No. 63 dated 29.3.2005 under Sections 376/325/ 120-B/506 IPC, registered at Police Station Model, Town, Ludhiana. In this case, while taking into consideration the age of the prosecutrix and the fact that she herself went with the boy at her own, Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, has granted anticipatory bail to the respondent. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the respondent-State and going through the order dated 21.4.2005, passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, whereby anticipatory bail has been granted to the respondent, I do not find any ground to cancel the bail. Dismissed. September 04, 2006 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE