* 1 * W.P. 2633.2009 1.03.2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2633 OF 2009 Sudhakar Dnyaneshwar Khade .......Petitioner V/S. The Miraj Urban Co­op Bank Ltd & anr. .........Respondents * * * * * * Mr. Amit Sale, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.G. Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mrs. V.R. Bhosale, APP for State­respondent no.2. Coram : Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J. 1st March, 2011. P.C. : 1. This writ petition is preferred to challenge the order dated 2nd September, 2009 passed by the Sessions Court, Sangli on the application below Exhibit­20 filed by the petitioner in his Criminal Revision Application No. 161 of 2009. * 2 * W.P. 2633.2009 1.03.2011 2. By the application at Exhibit­20, the petitioner had sought concession in making payment of Rs.5,00,000/­ in the court. The concession sought was of making the payment by installments. The Sessions Court on considering the application had put the condition of immediate deposit of Rs.50,000/­ in the Court by its order dated 2nd August, 2009. The petitioner deposited Rs.50,000/­ within 4 days as directed by the order. Then, the application at Exhibit­20 came to be allowed by the impugned order granting 3 installments of Rs.1,25,000/­ with the last installment of Rs.75,000/­. This order is sought to be challenged by the petitioner. Since the impugned order allows the application of the petitioner, he cannot challenge the same. The challenge is to the order itself and not to the quantum of installments. Hence, the petition is dismissed. [Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J]