IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.269 of 2010 KHIKHAR YADAV @ HARISHANKAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 24.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that co-accused Vidyanand Yadav, having similar allegation without help of section 12 of Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000, has been allowed bail vide Cr.Misc.No. 52492 of 2008. In that view of the matter, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Juvenile Justice Board, Supaul in G.R.Case No. 328 of 2008 arising out of Supaul P.S. Case No. 68 of 2008. It is made clear that one of the bailer shall be petitioner’s father who shall undertake to keep the petitioner under his observation and shall produce him whenever is ordered by the Juvenile Justice Board. Both the impugned orders dated 16.1.2010 2 passed in Cr.Appeal no. 25 of 2009 by Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. III, Saharsa and 30.10.2009 passed in G.R.No. 328 of 2008 by Juvenile Justice Board, Supaul are set aside. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)