HieH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR W,P.(SlNo.5224^2007 PETITIONER RBSPONDBNT8 ^-Chaituram NirmaUcar, s/o Late Shri Tijurara Nimialkar, aged about 60 years, r/o 'vQSage. & Post BhathagaQn, TahsU Kurud, Distt. Dhamtari(C.G.) Vcrsus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through; The Secretaiy, Water Resources Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Sub-Divisional Of&cer, Water Mauageinent, Suto-Division No.2, Bhathagaon, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G) 3. The Executive Engmeer, Mahanadi Water Management Dam, Division No.2, Rudri, Tahsil & District Dhamtari(C.G). WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OP THE CONSTITUTION OP INDIA Appearauce: Shri P.P. Sahu, Counsel for fhe petitioner. Shri N.K. Agrawal, Seiiior Advocate and Deputy Advocate General wifh SIiri A,S. Kachhwaha, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents. ORALORDBR (31.10.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SiNHA, J. Heard. Leamed counsel for tfae petitioner submits that a pennaiient Gaug-man is to be retired at fhe age of 62 years ia accordaace with the Chhattisgarh Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivcvshiki-Ayu) Adhiniyam 1967 read with Fundamental Rules, 56. He also subuuts fhat the poiat raised has been decided by this Court iu batch ofmattera i.e. W.P. No. 108/2005 and inaay otber coianected matters on 04.01.2007, reported ta 2007 (2) C.GJ,.J. 29 (Gwm.n.a. & Othcrs vs. State o/C.G. cuid others) and this niatter is squarely covered by that decision, which inay be disposed ofon fhe same terrus. pr' W.P. (S) No.5224/2007 o.' Lcarued couasel for the State fairly ^rees that fhis laatter is covered by the said decision. However, tie subudts fhat ia sonie inattei^ fhe State has filed writ appeals. Unless some iatei-un order is passed, inerely on accoiint of fiUng of the writ appeal, hearing of fhis writ petition cannot be kept ia abeyaace, when the luatter is squarely covered by the said judgiaent. In fhe result, this petitioa is aUowed. It is disposed of in tenns of the order dated 04.01.2007 passed in W.P. No. 108/2005 aad other coimected matters. No order as to cost. Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge