IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4943 of 2009 RAM DARSHAN PRASAD SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2/ 18/04/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The claim in this writ application is for grant of A.C.P. benefits. Though pargrph-18 states that the petitioner has represented, no copy of the representation or even the date of such representation has been mentioned. The sine qua non for a writ petition is a demand and refusal of the relief. The writ application is disposed with the observation that if the petitioner files a representation for grant of A.C.P. benefits the authorities are obliged to consider the same in accordance with law expeditiously and pass a reasoned and speaking order thereon without delay. The writ application stands disposed. KC (Navin Sinha, J.)