Writ Petition No.8273/2011 (s) 19.10.2011 Shri B.L. Nagar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Heard on the question of admission. O R D E R By this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner/workman has challenged the award dated 01.11.2010 passed by the Labour Court, Ujjain in Case No.10/2007 IDR, by which though the petitioner has been ordered to be reinstated in service, but has been denied back wages. 2. The petitioner was working as a daily wager. His services were terminated on 01.07.1994. Aggrieved, the petitioner approached to the MP State Administrative Tribunal by filing Original Application. On abolition of the Tribunal, the said OA was transferred to this Court and was numbered as Writ Petition No.4364/2003. The said writ petition was disposed of on 02.02.2006, giving liberty to the petitioner to raise an industrial dispute. On referring the matter by the Deputy Labour Commissioner, the Labour Court decided the dispute about the petitioner's termination, holding that the petitioner was illegally retrenched, however, taking note of the fact that the petitioner was a daily wager, the Labour Court denied him back wages. Feeling aggrieved, the petitioner has filed this petition. 3. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, we find no ground to take a different view than the view, 2 which has been taken by the Labour Court for denying him back wages. Keeping in view the nature of the petitioner's employment and the totality of the circumstances, in our considered view, the Labour Court has committed no error in denying the back wages to the petitioner. The discretion exercised by the Labour Court, being just and proper, needs no interference in this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the petition fails and is hereby dismissed. (Shantanu Kemkar) (Prakash Shrivastava) Judge Judge rcp