%% W HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Pe1ition 1S! No. 6313 61'2009' ~ Peh’tioner Net Ram Rathore . Versus Respondents - State of Chhattisgarh and others “(Writ Petiu‘on Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Amati J.) Shri Ashwani Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. Shxi A.V. Sridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State] mspondehts. a 7 o RD E menu Passed on this 4th daY of November, 2009 Leamed counsel appealing for the peu'tionerosubmits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on ments at th1s stage and prays for mthdrawal of tins petunon mth hberty to make a mpresentanon 1n the hght of the cucular dated 27 12 2008 (Annexum P/2) Leamed Panel Lawyer appearing hr the respondents/State subunts that 1f a representatton 1s made the same shall be cons1dered and dec1ded w1thm a penod of thxee weeks mm the I . date of rece1pt of the mpresentatlon 1n the hght of the above stated cn‘cttlar as well as the order dated 20. 1.2009(Anuexure P13), passed by this Court ip W.P.'(s) No.6128/2oo7 (Jagannath ‘ Ram Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh 8r. others) and other connected matters. V In View of the'foregoing, the pen'tion is dismissed as wlthdrawn w1th the above—stated hbetty It 1s expected that the concerned . authonttes would cons1der and declde the lepresentatlon, if any, as above, subject to venncauon of facts w1thm a penod of tluee weeks hum the date of rece1pt of the representation along With a copy of thts order Sdl— i ta Satislt K. Agnihotri Judge 2 s l §.