IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21915 of 2011 Mahender Prasad Versus Arun Kumar & Ors ---------------------------------- 06. 14.12.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 19.12.2006 passed by Sub Judge I, Hilsa, Nalanda in Title Suit No.69 of 2003 whereby the learned Court below refused to appoint Advocate Commissioner to inspect the suit land and to prepare an inventory of the properties. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondents are trying to dispose of the properties mentioned in Lot 1 and 2 of Schedule-III of the plaint and, therefore, the petitioner filed application but the learned Court below rejected the same. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the learned Court below found that there was nothing on record in support of the fact that the respondents were trying to dispose of the said property. It may be mentioned here that the order was passed in December, 2006 and now five years have lapsed but still today, except the said statement that the respondents are trying to dispose of the property, nothing is brought on record. 2 In such circumstances, I do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. Thus, this writ application is dismissed. Saurabh (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)