HIGHCQURTOFCHHATTI8GARHATBILASPIJR WRIT PETITION No. 988 of2001 PETITIONER RESPONDENT : Sunil Kiimar Agrawal S/o Nathu Lal Agrawal, aged about 30 years. R^ Dev^ndra Nagar, Ra4)w (C.O,) VERSUS : Regional Transport Authority, Raipur. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmjrTON OF INDIA 8B: Hon*ble Shri Satish K. Asirihotofc J. Present: None for the petitioner. Shri S.K-Mishra, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent. ORDER (Passed on 14th day of November, 2007) 1. The matter is called for hearing twice. On both occasions, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested m the matter. 2. In view of the above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim relief^-anted on 20.06.2001 is discharged. 3. Consequently, M(W)P No. 847/2002, application for vacation of stay, also stan^ disposed of. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit