IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 12183 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: May 28, 2010. Darbara Singh ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Punjab ...... RESPONDENT(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, AAG, Punjab. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) This is an application for regular bail filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in FIR No. 43 dated 15.02.2010, under Sections 307/323/324/34 IPC and 25/54/59 Arms Act, registered at Police Station Sultanpur Lodhi, District Kapurthala. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is 80 years old and that injured is his son and that, in fact, it is a family dispute between the parties regarding land. It is further contended that injury attributed to the present petitioner is only on thumb and palm of the CRM No.12183 of 2010 injured. It is further contended that he has been continuing in custody since 20.03.2010 and that trial is not likely to be concluded in near future. Learned counsel for the State, on instruction from HC.Gurmej Singh, has not disputed these facts. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, keeping in view these facts and without expressing any opinion on merits, the instant application for regular bail filed on behalf of Darbara Singh, is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Kapurthala. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) May 28, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2