IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16536 of 2011 Rajeev Kumar Pandey Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03/ 27.06.2011 Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Allegedly, petitioner along with other accused were caught while they were making plan to commit dacoity. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that prior to the institution of the present case, only one case had been registered against the petitioner for the offence under section 380 of the IPC and the said case had been lodged by the co-villager of the petitioner. It is further contended by him that when the petitioner was remanded in this case, he was remanded in two other cases in which petitioner had not been named. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Rajeev Kumar Pandey, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Sessions Judge II, Vaishali at Hajipur in Sessions Trial no. 394/2010 arising out of Sonepur (Hajipur) Rail P.S. Case no. 18/2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)