IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-17036 of 2009 Date of decision : 2.7.2009 Amit Sharma and another … Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr.Justice Augustine George Masih Present: Mr.Partap Mann, Advocate for the petitioners. Augustine George Masih , J. (Oral) Present petition has been moved wherein the petitioners are seeking protection of the alleged threat from respondent No.4 (father of petitioner No.1). There is nothing on record to suggest that this Court has territorial jurisdiction to entertain the present petition. The documents which have been placed on record clearly suggest that both the petitioners as well as respondent No.4 are the residents of Gaaziabad. There is no proof of the alleged marriage solemnized between the petitioners nor the place where the marriage took place specified in the petition. Even no proof has been given that they are as a matter of fact, residents of Amritsar. I find no merit in the petition, and the same is accordingly dismissed. [ Augustine George Masih ] Judge 02.7.2009 sd