1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2050 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5298 OF 2010 (Mrs. Rafat Sayeed M.A. Sayeed .v. State of Maharashtra and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri R.S. Sundaram, Advocate for the applicant. Shri K.L. Dharmadhikari, AGP for the respondent Nos.1 to 3. Shri C.S. Kaptan, Advocate for the respondent No.4. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. 09TH AUGUST, 2011. This Court by an order dated 28.10.2010 refused the interim relief to the petitioner and observed that the petitioner can always be compensated in money terms in case the petition succeeds. On the same analogy, the relief sought by this civil application also cannot be granted. It would not be possible to direct the respondent No.4 to recommend the name of the petitioner to the Performance Review Committee as according to the respondents, the petitioner has already stood superannuated at the age of 58 years. Civil Application is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE *rrg.