IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 50 of 2004 (M/B) Ramesh Chandra Bajaj S/o Sri Mohan Lal Bajaj, R/o Moh. Ganj, Park Road, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar. ……… Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Govt. of India, New Delhi. 2. Punjab National Bank, through Regional Manager, Regional Office Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar. ……… Respondents. Mr. M.C. Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondents. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Mr. M.C. Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondents. 2. Mr. M.C. Bansal, the learned counsel for the petitioner, in view of the dictum of the Apex Court in the case of Mardia Chemicals Ltd. and others Vs. Union of India and others reported in (2004) 4 Supreme Court Cases 311, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition, whereby the petitioner is challenging the notice issued by the second respondent under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. 3. Permission granted. 4. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as withdrawn. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 13.06.2006 13.06.2006 G