IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) THURSDAY THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN : PRESENT: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE: V.ESWARAIAH CONTEMPT CASE No. 1046 of 2006 Between: 1. G. Shyamlal, S/o. G. Narayana. 2. Mohd. Ismail Pasha, S/o. Sarvar Miya. 3. Md. Khaja Moinuddin, S/o. Suleman. 4. U. Brahma Prasad, S/o. U. Balaiah. .. Petitioners AND 1. Sri Sai Prasad, the Chairman-cum-Managing Director, A.P. Central Power Distribution Company Ltd., Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad. 2. Sri L. Madanmohan, the Superintending Engineer (Operation), Operation Circle/Rangareddy (South), A.P.C.P.D.C.L., Mint Compound, Hyderabad. .. Respondents To 1. Sri Sai Prasad, the Chairman-cum-Managing Director, A.P. Central Power Distribution Company Ltd., Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad. 2. Sri L. Madanmohan, the Superintending Engineer (Operation), Operation Circle/Rangareddy (South), A.P.C.P.D.C.L., Mint Compound, Hyderabad. WHEREAS the Petitioner herein has presented a petition to this court under Section 10, 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 punish the respondent No. 1 and 2 herein for non-compliance of directions in Judgment passed In Writ Petition NO. 21727 of 2003, dated: 19-07-2004, under Contempt of Courts Act; AND WHEREAS this court upon perusing the case and the affidavit filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Donthi Reddy Venkat Reddy, Advocate for the petitioner and of Sri G. Vidyasagar, Advocate for the respondents, while admitting the Contempt Case and while dispensing with presence of Respondents directed issue of notice to the Respondents herein to show cause why, in the circumstances stated in the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof (copies of which are annexed hereto) he should not be punished for contempt of court; and the Court directed the Registry since the counter has been filed post the matter “for hearing after three weeks along with C.C. NO. 1333 of 2006; Now: Therefore you namely; 1. Sri Sai Prasad, the Chairman-cum-Managing Director, A.P. Central Power Distribution Company Ltd., Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad. 2. Sri L. Madanmohan, the Superintending Engineer (Operation), Operation Circle/Rangareddy (South), A.P.C.P.D.C.L., Mint Compound, Hyderabad. BE AND HEREBY are directed to show cause 16-03-2007 to which date the case stands posted as to why in the circumstances stated in the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof, you should not be punished for contempt of court ; Given under my hand and the seal of the High Court this Thursday the 22nd day of February 2007. DEPUTY REGISTRAR To 1. The Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. (in duplicate with a copy of petition and affidavit for service on the respondent No 1 and 2 and to return to this court on or before 16-03-2007) 2. S ri Sai Prasad, the Chairman-cum-Managing Director, A.P. Central P ow er Distribution Company Ltd., Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad. 3. Sri L. Madanmohan, the Superintending Engineer (Operation), Operation Circle/Rangareddy (South), A.P.C.P.D.C.L., Mint Compound, Hyderabad.(ADDRESSEES 2 AND 3 BY SPECIAL MESSENGER with a copy of petition and affidavit) 4. Two spare copies. Ksv HIGH COURT Ksv Date of drafting: 14-03-2007 VEJ DATE: 22-02-2007 NOTE: POST ON 16-03-2007 “FOR FINAL HEARING” ALONG WITH CC. NO. 1333 OF 2006 C.C. No. 1046 of 2006 DISPENSING WITH THE PRESENCE OF RESPONDENTS