IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19005 of 2011 Niraj Kumar Mahto, S/O-Late Ram Pratap Mahto Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02 29.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Although, petitioner is named in the first information report with allegation that he along with other accused kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant but submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the victim was major at the time of the alleged occurrence and, as a matter of fact, she voluntarily left her home and subsequently, solemnized her marriage with co- accused Dhiraj Kumar Mahto by her own sweet will and the petitioner has been implicated in this case because he happens to be full brother of aforesaid co-accused Dhiraj Kumar Mahto. It is also pointed out by him that the victim and aforesaid co-accused Dhiraj Kumar Mahto are leading their married life somewhere in Nepal and the whereabouts of the victim and co-accused is not known to the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No. 20 of 2011. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)