IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3278 of 2011 RAM NARAYAN YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 29.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The victim was shepherd of the petitioner who had some dispute with regard to grazing the animals with Hira Yadav and Bachhu Yadav, but in the night, the victim received several injuries. One Mahto Rai informed about the injury to the victim when the petitioner and another took the victim to hospital, but subsequently, the victim died. Learned counsel for the state submits that the petitioner was giving wrong information to the doctor that the victim was beaten by animal. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no accusation against the petitioner of causing any injury to the victim and the suspicion has 2 only been raised on the ground that the victim was working as a shepherd in the house of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Benipur in connection with Kusheshwar Asthan P.S. Case No. 159/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if the petitioner defaults for three consecutive occasions during the trial. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)