1 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1426 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 2818 OF 2008 Alka Nitin Pandya & Anr. ...Plaintiffs. Vs. Pradeep K. Pandya & Ors. ...Defendants. ---- Mr.Armin Wandrewalla i/b Mr. Akshay Vani, for the Plaintiffs. Mr. L.C. Joshi, for Defendant Nos.1 to 4. Mr. Abhishek Khare i/b M/s Khare Legal Chambers, for Defendant No.5. ---- CORAM : R.V. MORE, J. DATE: 10th November 2009 P.C. 1. The learned counsel for the plaintiffs submits that the defendants and respondents have already been served. She tenders affidavit of service to that effect. 2. Heard learned counsel for the plaintiffs, defendant nos.1 to 4 and defendant no.5. 3. The Chamber Summons is taken out to amend the plaint in accordance with the schedule annexed to the Chamber Summons. The learned counsel for defendant nos.1 to 4 and defendant no.5 have no objection if the proposed amendment is allowed. Defendant no.6 and respondents, though served, have not 2 bothered to appear before this court or file a reply to the Chamber Summons. 4. In these circumstances, and for the reasons stated in the affidavit-in- support, the Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Plaintiffs to carry out necessary amendment within a period of two weeks from today. Plaintiffs to serve amended copies of the plaint to the defendants and respondents within two weeks thereafter. Plaintiffs to communicate this order to defendant no.6 and respondent nos.1 and 2 immediately. ( R.V. MORE, J )