THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION No.7737 of 2011 ORDER: Petitioner/Accused approached this Court with a prayer to quash the proceedings initiated against her in Crime No.376 of 2011 of Meerpet P.S., Cyberabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 427, 447, 468 and 471 IPC. The main contention raised by learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner joined as a member in Vijayadurga Chit Fund Company, Vanasthalipuram, and having stood as a successful bidder of the said chit, she handed over the link documents of her property, being the owner thereof, to the Chit Fund Company as a collateral security and subsequently she came to know that some of the documents submitted by her were misplaced by the officials of the Chit Fund Company, for which she lodged a complaint on 28.07.2011 incorporating the name of the defacto-complainant herein also along with two others in the complaint and the same was numbered as Crime No.368 of 2011 by the 1st respondent police. Learned counsel further submitted that as a counter blast to Crime No.368 of 2011, the 2nd respondent foisted the present complaint against the petitioner. A perusal of the record prima facie discloses that the 2nd respondent herein is the genuine purchaser of the land in question and he is not aware of missing of the document as alleged by the petitioner and he claims to have been in possession of the property in question. The disputed facts in connection with a crime registered by the Investigating Officer cannot be probed into by this Court by invoking the provisions under Section 482 Cr.P.C., as it is the prerogative of the Investigating Officer to call for the complainant as well as the accused and to verify the documents and find out the genuineness and truthfulness of the complaint. Since there are disputed facts in connection with the present crime, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the investigation at this stage. However, if the petitioner apprehends arrest in the hands of the respondent police, she is at liberty to file an application, for grant of anticipatory bail, before the Sessions Court concerned, and on such application being filed, the Sessions Judge concerned shall grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner since she being a lady. Accordingly, this criminal petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this criminal petition shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO 29.08.2011 v v