IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 22710_of 2007 Between: 1 Mamidi Bhaskara Rao, S/o.Late Satyanarayana, Door No.1-25-305, Mainbazaar, Vijayawada-520001 2 Nandipati Mallikarjuna Rao, S/o.Venkata Subba Rao, Door No.1-25-284, Mainbazaar, Vijayawada-520001 3 Basa Mastan Rao, M/s. Ambica Traders, Door No.32-15-137, Moghal Rajpuram,Vijawada Dist ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Commissioner of Police, Vijayawada,Krishna Dist 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer,Urban Vijayawada,Krishna Dist 3 The Dist Collector, Machilipatnam, Krishna Dist 4 The Law and Order, Crimes and Traffic, I Town Vijayawada,Krishna Dist 5 The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Vijayawada, Krishna Dist 6 The Divisional Fire Officer, Vijawada,Krishna Dist .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners: NONE APPEARED Counsel for Respondent Nos.1, 4 and 6: GP FOR HOME Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 and 3: NONE APPEARED Counsel for Respondent No.5: SMT.G.JHANSI The Court made the following : ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantial relief: ‘It is therefore, just and necessary that the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the respondents herein in trying to shift the petitioners fire-works shops viz. Mamidi Bhaskar Rao, 11-25-305, Main Bazar, Vijayawada, Krishna district; N.Mallikarjuna Rao, 11-25-284, Main Bazar, Vijayawada; Basa Masthan rao, M/s.Ambika Traders, 32-15-137, Nimmathota, Mogalrajpuram, Vijayawada, Krishna District, only on oral orders of the respondents as arbitrary, illegal and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents herein not to shift or interfere in possession and sale of fire works from the petitioners existing shops and to pass such other order or orders as are deemed fit and proper.’ At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioners. From the nature of the relief sought for in this Writ Petition, it is evident that the Writ Petition has become infructuous in view of passing off, of Diwali festival. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.29546 of 2007 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. _____________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 25th April, 2008 lur