IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 11053 of 2008 Between: Desetty Mallaiah S/o. Late Lingaiah R/o. Prashant Nagar Gram Panchayat, SiddipetMandal, Medak district. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Mandal Revenue Offcier, Siddipet mandal, Medak district. 2 Gram Panchayat Prashant nagar, Siddipet Mandal, Medak District, rep. by its Sarpanch Ellu Ravinder reddy, S/o. Bapu Reddy R/o. H.No. 6-165, Vasera colonty, Siddipet mandal, Medak Dsitrict. 3 Allakunta Narsaiah S/o. Chinna Venkaiah, R/o. H.No. 2-164, Vaddera Colony, Prashant Nagar, Siddipet Mandal, Medak Distirct. 4 Bhura Mallesh S/o. Rajaiah R/o. H.No. 12-115, Indira Nagar, Prashant Nagar, siddipet Mandal, Medak District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in non-receipt of petitioner application for building permission, as illegal, contrary to law and unconstitutional of India and directing the 2nd respondent to receive the petitioner application for building permission and consider the same and consequently direct the 1and 2nd respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from his house patta plot admeasuring 830 sq yards in Survey No. 1907, situated in Prashant Nagar Grampanchayat, Siddipet Village and Mandal, Medak District. Counsel for the Petitioner : G.TIRUPATHI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents : G.ELISHA( SC FOR ZPPS AND MPPS,TEL REG) The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO.11053 OF 2008 ORDER : This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the 2nd respondent Gram Panchayat in not entertaining the application of the petitioner for building permission as arbitrary and illegal. Pursuant to the notice ordered by this Court, Sri G. Elisha entered appearance for the 2nd respondent and, under instructions, submitted that the application of the petitioner will be received and will be considered in accordance with law by the 2nd respondent. Accordingly, recording the submission of the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent, Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent to receive the application of the petitioner for building permission and consider the same in accordance with law. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J Dt. 19.06.2008 gbs