IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-22655 of 2009 Date of Decision: October 14, 2009 Sukhwant Singh @ Rinku … Petitioner Versus State of Punjab. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present: Mr. Harindar Kumar Aurora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. B.B.S. Teji, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab. S.D. Anand, J. (Oral) It is common ground that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The further averment is that a co-accused, who is indeed named in the FIR, has since been released on regular bail. In the absence of the Investigating Officer, the learned State counsel is not in a position to concede or deny the correctness of that averment. The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail, subject to his furnishing bail bonds, to the satisfaction of the concerned Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate. October 14, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge