IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19435 of 2010 PINKU YADAV, S/o Bahadur Yadav. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 23.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 384, 387 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner was refused bail by order dated 13.10.2009 vide Cr. Misc. No. 34546 of 2009 but the submission is that the petitioner is in custody since 04.06.2009 and two out of five witnesses examined during trial have not supported the case of the prosecution. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Rupuli (Tikapatti) P.S. Case No. 29 of 2007 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an 2 affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the father of the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The fact that the petitioner is an accused in only two other cases besides the present one will be verified by the Magistrate concerned before releasing the petitioner on bail. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)