IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.W.P.No.1831 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:October 7, 2010 Parshotam .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Harish Nain, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 4(1)(a) of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988, is for issuance of directions to the respondents to release the petitioner on furlough for three weeks. Heard. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that application in this regard has already been moved before respondent no.4, i.e., Superintendent, District Jail, Jind, and that his case for furlough has also been initiated vide his office letter nos.7471-72 dated 17.8.2010 and however, the same is pending with respondent no.3. Hence, in view of these facts and as per request, the present petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider and decide the application of the petitioner, already stated to have been moved before respondent no.4, as per law, Rules and Instructions on the point, within two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 7.10.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge