IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. ORDER S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6244/2007 Habbi Vs. SBBJ, Jaipur. 6.8.2008. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Shri V.S. Badhwar, for the petitioner. Shri J.K.Singhi, for the respondent. The petitioner in this writ petition has prayed for a direction to the respondent Bank to redetermine and reschedule the loan amount under the one time settlement scheme of the respondent Bank. Learned counsel for the respondent has pointed out that this is a second innings of the petitioner before this court inasmuch as the petitioner had earlier filed S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3888/2004 which came to be decided on 6.8.2004 and this court passed the following order : “Petitioner is directed to furnish the receipts of deposits before the respondent bank within a period of 15 days from the date of passing of this order and bank is further directed to prepare the statement of account and allow the petitioner to inspect the statement of account within a period of 15 days. For the aforesaid period of one month further proceedings with regard to the auction shall remain stayed. After making due compliance of this order the interim direction shall stand vacated automatically. In case the petitioner wishes to deposit the entire outstanding amount in accordance with the fresh statement of account prepared by the bank, it is for the bank to consider the case of the petitioner for easy installments. With these observations the writ petition stand disposed of.” It is pointed out that the relief which was sought was granted to the petitioner vide the aforesaid order. It is submitted that the petitioner never approached the Bank by means of any application or were any receipts filed. Nor has the aforesaid fact been disclosed in the present writ petition about the earlier writ petition. I am of the view that the present writ petition amounts to an abuse of the process of the court inasmuch as the petitioner has not disclosed the fact of filing of the earlier petition and passing of the order by this court in that behalf which amounts to suppression of material fact. Accordingly in view of the above this writ petition is dismissed summarily. (DALIP SINGH),J. Ramchandrkhatri,PS