HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.C. No. 759 OF 2009 Friday, the Sixteenth Day of April, Two Thousand and Ten Between Ganapa Anueswari and another Petitioners AND D.Narasimha Reddy and others Respondents THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO. 759 OF 2009 ORAL ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari) Complaining willful disobedience and deliberate flouting of the order dated 27.04.2005 passed in CCCA MP No. 328 of 2005 in CCCA No. 91 of 2005 by this Court, whereby status quo as on the date of order with respect to possession of the suit schedule property was ordered to be maintained and further directing the parties not to alienate or change the nature of the suit schedule property, pending further orders, the present Contempt Case is filed by the appellants in the above Appeal. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners herein that the respondents have violated the orders by carrying out constructions in the disputed suit schedule property; whereas the learned counsel for the respondents submits that the respondents have not violated any orders, as alleged. A counter affidavit has also been filed inter alia contending that the sanction plan for the construction on the suit schedule property was obtained as long back as on 9.2.2004. Therefore, in view of this assertion made in the counter affidavit, we are of the considered view that the petitioners can agitate their rights in the appeal viz., CCCA No. 91 of 2005. We also make it clear that the constructions made, if any, are subject to the result of the appeal. With the above observations, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. The Registry is directed to list the appeal CCCA No. 91 of 2005 for final hearing on 14.06.2010. ____________________ Justice T.Meena Kumari _______________________ Justice L.Narasimha Reddy April 16, 2010 MAS.