1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (STAMP)NO. 30051 OF 2009 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 128 OF 2009 IN FERA APPEAL NO.1 of 2009 Sanjay Rishi ...Review Petitioner/Orig.Applicant. vs. Special Director, Enforcement Directorate. ...Respondent Ms. Ruby Kherade i/b. Little & Co.,Advocates, for the Review Petitioner. Mrs. S.V.Bharucha, with Mr. A.S.Rao, Advocates, for the respondent. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 15th February, 2010. P.C. 1. The petitioner approached this Court against the order dated 18.6.2009 seeking review contending that statement of different Counsel was recorded wrongly and therefore the orders be recalled. 2. We had recorded the statement that 10% of the amount has already been deposited and for the balance amount, they have furnished bank guarantee. The learned Counsel points out that before the Tribunal they gave only bank 2 guarantee of 10% of the penalty amount and no amount had been deposited. 3. This Court, considering two concurrent orders in favour of the Revenue, had passed the order dated 18.6.2009 to secure revenue which was 10% of the amount to be deposited and the rest to be secured by bank guarantee. It is only in view of the statement made by the Counsel, that we had recorded the statement on 18.6.2009. 4. We now clarify as under :- 10% of the amount has to be deposited and the rest to be secured by bank guarantee. The entire exercise to be completed within 8 weeks from today. The order stands clarified accordingly. Review Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)