IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12800 of 2011 RAMNATH CHAUDHARY . Versus THE STATE THROUGH C.B.I . ----------- 4. 18.05.2011 It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in the prayer portion case No. has wrongly been typed. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion in the course of day. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing for Central Bureau of Investigation. Admittedly at the relevant time petitioner was posted as Branch Manager of concerned Gramin Bank. It is stated that allegation maker made a complaint before the C.B.I. officers that petitioner was demanding Rs. 15,000/- for permitting her to withdraw the sanctioned loan amount from the concerned bank and subsequently the C.B.I. managed a trap team and thereafter allegation maker withdrew Rs. 1,50,000/- from the bank and thereafter the middle man of the petitioner demanded Rs. 15,000/- from the allegation maker and the allegation maker handed over Rs. 15,000/- to him and the aforesaid middle man went in the official chamber of the petitioner and gave Rs. 15,000/- to him which was put by the petitioner on his official table and thereafter trap team went inside the official chamber of the petitioner and seized the aforesaid Rs. 15,000/- from the table of official chamber of the petitioner and thereafter petitioner as well as the aforesaid middle 2 person was arrested . Admittedly the alleged recovery has not been made from conscious possession of the petitioner rather the said recovery has been made from the official table of the petitioner and it is also an admitted fact that the above stated middle person accepted the aforesaid money from the complainant and thereafter the aforesaid money was handed over to the petitioner. Although learned counsel appearing for the C.B.I. opposed the prayer on the ground that the investigation of this case is still pending and if the petitioner is released on bail the investigation would be hampered, but considering the above stated facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions of the parties, I think it proper to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Learned Special Judge, C.B.I. South Bihar ,Patna in Special Case No. 06/2011 arising out of R.C.Case No. 08/A/2011. Nitesh (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)