IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 646 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 646 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 646 OF 2006 1. Union of India & 10 ors. ] .. Petitioners Versus 1. Manoj Chiman Mahida & 9 ors. ] .. Respondents Mr. N.D. Sharma for the petitioners. None for the respondents. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 27TH MARCH, 2006 P.C. : . In our opinion, this is a frivolous Petition. The concerned authorities should examine as to how such Petitions are filed and take steps accordingly. 2. In the instant case, the Tribunal has not passed any order. All that it has stated is that the Commissioner to consider the applicants representation for regularization and dispose of the same by a speaking order. The petitioners, if aggrieved, can have their grievance placed before the Commissioner who, in fact, is an authority under the respondents. : 2 : 3. For the aforesaid reasons, no interference. Petition rejected. Sd/- [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] Sd/- [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]