1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5566 OF 2010 Sharad s/o Vishnupant Malode & ors. ... PETITIONER VERSUS The Secretary, General Administration Department & ors. ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri S.A. Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioner Shri S.K. Kadam, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 and 2. ..... CORAM: P.V. HARDAS & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED: 25th June, 2010 PER COURT : 1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges the communication dated 23.9.2009, informing the petitioner that candidates belonging to project affected persons category would be required to submit themselves to the rigours of the selection process. 2. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Kadam, learned A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 and 2. The aforesaid communication is based upon the decision of the Full Bench, which in turn had overruled the Division Bench judgment. Since the said 2 communication has been issued in tune with the judgment of the Full Bench, we do not find any error whatsoever in the said communication. This petition, which is sans merits is, therefore, summarily dismissed with no order as to costs. (N.D. DESHPANDE, J.) (P.V. HARDAS, J.) fmp/wp5566.10