1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 5580 OF 2010 Gajendra S/o Bapu Puri & Ors ...Petitioners Versus Nagnath Devasthan Trust Tirth (Bk) & Anr. ... Respondents ... Mr. N.M. Tungar, Advocate for Petitioners Mr. K.K. Kulkarni & Mrs. M.A. Kulkarni,Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. K.B. Choudhari, AGP for respondent No. 2 CORAM :- S.V. GANGAPURWALA JJ. DATE :- 24th June, 2011 PER COURT: 1. Present petitioners are the original defendants. Present respondent had filed a suit against the petitioners for temporary injunction, the Trial Court allowed the application below Exh. 5, aggrieved thereby the present petitioners have filed an appeal to the District Court. The District Court dismissed the said appeal, confirming the Judgment and Order passed by the Trial Court. The Petitioners have assailed the said said Judgment before this Court. 2. The present Writ Petition is arising out of concurrent 2 finding. 3. The observations are prima facie in nature. The real controversy between the parties can be decided after adducing the evidence. This Court on 22-07-2010 has directed the parties to maintain status-quo and no third party interest is to be created. 4. Taking into account the fact that since 22-07-2010, the said order was in force, it would be appropriate to direct the Trial Court to dispose of the suit expeditiously. The suit is of the year 2007, the pleadings of the parties are also complete. The suit is at the stage of evidence. 5. As such, without entering into the merits of the Writ Petition, the petition is disposed of directing the parties to maintain status-quo. The Trial Court shall dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of six months. No Costs. [S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J ] SDM* 5580.10/24-6-10