(L^-1^9 INTHEHON'BLEWIGHC^I^OFCi^AT^ BILASPUR i j WRIT PETITI0N (S) NO.S^^^OF 2011 PETlnoNER RESPONbENTS ^ ....^^^&^'''^ ^-'j^'"::.:y'iii:/; f^^^' '• • y .¥ "/ ^SMt. RA6IN£ SONWANI W/o Punurgm Sohwani; aged about 24;yecirs, R/o ©ram Panchayat Bhanvtdfd, waTd No, 9, yiHage ^Kgijvtara^Tahsif; Pdri-igar-h.DistnGj-ti^^ VERSUS 1. STATE OFeHHAtTISGARH Through - Seer'etary, Social Welfare, Women and i Child Develbpfnent Department, b.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.6.). • : .,'..•'.••. . !:::, ^Z. THE COLLECTOR, District: Janjgir-Champa (C.6.) 3. TNE<l :EF ©(ECUTIVEOFFI^ JanpadPanclTQyat-Pflmgdr'K Oisfrict: J'dhjgir-Chdmpa C.6.) ^4. THECHIEF EXECUtIVBOFFICER; District Panchayat - Janjgir-Ghatnpa, biStrict:Jdrygir-GhampaC.6.)^ 5. TMEPROJECTOPFICER. ICDSPFOject.Pdmgarh, Distr'ict:JaJ9ir-chaff'pd(C.G.).. 6. LAl^TA BARMAN W/oRaJesKKumar' LahPe.-R/tfSnarrj Panchayat- Blwnv^ War<:!eNo.lO,vill(^eBhanvatara, Tdhsil- Bdmgar'K,District:Jdnjgi|-- Champa(C.6.). WRIT PETitEON UNbER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTlTUTllONOFINbIA ^ ^ / ?•". JS' "XI-HC—78 311^1 W f<!-fi+ wnsn^r'amN? Braweea WWIT t(>*)ltft 3'5r •^i<ii<n<i, ®flly<is,fi«ni'My ,.....^&.:M'i.2^LTRF^ 200 ail^T'^^ ('pf'P^) TOTIW flfta siit?T fSB : Hon'bte Shri nianindlra Mohan Shrtvastava. J. 13.5.2011 .,. ShnQ.I. Sharan, coufisel ' Shri N. Naha Roy, P4nel !:c6Fy^u':"-;'- 1-'1 . Heard on admission. be^n 'mtm pett^oner coiAisel This petition has appointment of responden|t procured appointment by ^ foiind fhat against appoin^: dated 22.3.2011, the appeal before fhe Collector.j Though, leamed even before issuance of brought to the notice of th|i vide Aiinexure P-4, no Coiirt, if (he appomtment coiild be raised by fhe Accordingly, fhis liberty to the petitioner t(} respondent No.6 on such iiader the law. filed by fhe petttioner, challengms No.6, on fhe ground that she has ^.bricating documents. It is, however, tment of respondent No.6 vide order has not avaUed her remedy of 'klffcl'il-f Hl'4<-il fl ft'A tR]*<K i?affiTO sil^l for fhe petttioner. Lawyer for ftie State, on advance for the petitioner submits fhat ^ppointment order, fhe matter was Collectbr as well as Project Officer, was taken, m the opinion of this has now been issued, fhls matter before the CoUector. is finalty disposed of, reserving ffle appeal agaiast appointment of ferounds as may be avaUable to him Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge actlon ohler petlt|oner pet|tlon