1 <?? <A<~ y^ IN THE HONORABLE CHHATTLSGARH HIGH CQURT AT BILASPUR Criniinal Miscellaneous Petition No. ^' 2010 APPLICANT: VERSUS NON-APPUCANTS: p> -^'' < '"^'o'^-^ R; S. Bajwa for R. S. Bajwa 85 Coinpany, Minocha Colony, Bilaspur, Post, Tahsil & Dist: Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 1. Amolak Singh Bhatia S/o Late Harbansh Singh Bhatia, Profession: Wine Contractor, R/o Minocha Colony, Bilaspur, Tahsil 8s Dist: Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ^ ^^?" ;'fT.\^-'*"' ^o .2- State of Chhattisgarh through: Police -^Y ^ Station: Civil Lines Bilaspur, _-^ Bilaspur, Tahsil 8s Dist: Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ^ y -> " Application u/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973.^, Ciy^sxA ^FpeoA'Ho-<s4^63pei~A.>o^h.si.p»^4H;; ^4Ui ^&.Ai'o^i-' '~-pi^e Applicant does hereby most respecffully subinit as under: fe»1 ct<>pw>- -> I-1 MS!^§— ^ HIOH COXIRT OF CHHATnSaAKH AT BILASPUR SB : HON'BLB; MR. JUSTICB PRITINKBR DWAKBR CR.M.P.MO. 39/2010 APPBLLAMT R.S.Bajwa versus RBSPQHDBNTS Amolak Siagh Bbatia & Another Sbri Rajlramal Singh, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Malay Bhaduri & Shri Narendra Chaadel, counsel for fhe respondent N0. 1. ShriU.K.S.Chandel, P.L. forthe Statc/resp. N0.2. APPLICATIOH U/8 482 OF THB CR.P.C. ORDBR (21-01-2010} The present petition has been fitod by the pctitioner stating fhat the learaed appdUate Court below te aot cven entertauiing the appUcations as ffled by him for canceUation of the arrest warrant. He submits that the appeUate Court below is at Uberty to decidc the application in accordaace wifh law but the same cannot refusc to accept the appUcation. On fhe ofher hand, it bas been argued by Shri Bhaduri fhat by one way or fhe ofher the petitioner is avoiding hte appearance before the appellate Court and fherefore the appeBate Court was left wifh no otfacr option but to issue arrest warrant. The parties have mformed that fhe ncxt date before fhe appeUate Court te 30.1.2010 and fhe petitioner agrces that he wiB appear before fhe appellate Court on the said date. He fiurfher submits that tUl then he niay not toe arrested. To tfais request of fhe petitioner, counsel ft>r the respondents havc no objectmn. In the fects and circumstances of fhe caae, the present petition is disposed of wifh a direction tfaat fhe petitioner wIU appear before the appeBate Goixrt on fhe ruxt date of hearing i.e. 30.1.2010 and the appeUate Court wiU decide the case on the said date on its own inerit without being mfluenced by this order. It is directed that tfll the next date of hearing the petitioner shaU not be arrested by fhe Court below. However, fhe parties would be bound by any order passed by fhe lowcr appellate Court ia the appeal of thc petitioner on the ucxt date ofhearing. Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge