Lsp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2739 of 2009 Shantaram Raghunath Raut ...Petitioner v/s. Grampanchayat Kaular Bk. & ors. ...Respondents Mr. Siddharth R. Ronghe for the petitioner. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. DATED DATED DATED : MARCH 13, 2009 : MARCH 13, 2009 : MARCH 13, 2009 P.C. . Heard Counsel for the Petitioner. 2. The argument of the Petitioner that no reason is recorded in the application as filed before the Lower Court coupled with the fact that no leave under sub-rule (2) of Rule 1-A of Order 8 of CPC was obtained and that production of documents at such belated stage ought not to be countenanced clearly overlooks that the Court below has passed discretionary order which is well within the norms of the relevant provisions on which the Petitioner relies. Being a discretionary order passed in the interest of justice by the Lower Court, no interference is exercise of writ jurisdiction is warranted. Dismissed. 3. Needless to observe that the question regarding 2 admissibility of documents which are permitted to be produced in terms of impugned order is a matter which will have to be decided in the trial at the appropriate stage. [A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.] [A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.] [A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.]