IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13708 of 2011 1. SHIV MURAT YADAV S/O LATE BAIJNATH YADAV. 2. CHANDRA SHEKHAR YADAV S/O SHIV MURAT YADAV. 3. UMESH SINGH. 4. SUMAN SINGH @ SUMANT SINGH, BOTH SONS OF RADHESHYAM SINGH. 5. BHOLU SINGH S/O GOPAL SINGH. 6. RAKESH BAHADUR SINGH. 7. MUKESH SINGH, BOTH SONS OF LALLAN SINGH. 8. RADHESHYAM SINGH S/O LATE BRIJ BIHARI SINGH. 9. DUDH NATH PASWAN S/O LATE SHIV MURAT PASWAN. 10. RAM AWATAR YADAV S/O LATE JHINGARDEO YADAV. 11. MANI SINGH @ MNI SINGH S/O LATE VIJAY BAHADUR SINGH. 12. OM PRAKASH SINGH S/O RADHESHYAM SINGH KUSHWAHA. 13. SOBH NATH KUSHWAHA S/O LATE MANORATH KUSHWAHA. 14. NARENDRA PRATAP SINGH S/O MARKANDEY SINGH. 15. RAMA SINGH @ RAM SINGH S/O LATE BRIJ NANDAN SINGH. 16. GORAKH NATH SINGH S/O LATE DAMARI SINGH. 17. SHAILESH SINGH S/O DINANATH SINGH. 18. RAMA BIND @ RAM BIND S/O SARAJU BIND. 19. KEDAR KUSHWAHA @ KADAR KUSHWAHA S/O KASHI KUSHWAHA. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 03.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners, informant and the State. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 342, 323, 380, 120(B), 427 and 552 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of entering into the hermitage, dragged, assaulted, the informant side and taken away the articles also. It is submitted by the learned senior counsel for the petitioners that there was a title dispute and serious litigation is going on between the parties as a result of which the petitioners have been implicated, whereas 2 the learned senior counsel for the informant submits that in spite of the status quo order, petitioners are interfering with the possession of the informant side and they are not only defying the orders of the Apex Court rather they have no respect for the orders of this Court also which gets reflected from the admission of the petitioners’ side that they could not execute bail bonds on the stipulated time in other case. It is undertaken by leaned senior counsel for the petitioners that petitioners shall henceforth not violate any order of the Court. It is submitted that other accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail which is not controverted by learned senior counsel for the informant. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua in connection with Chainpur P.S. Case No. 77 of 2010, 3 subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Indian Penal Code. It is expected that petitioners will furnish the bail bond within a period of four weeks to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua in connection with Chainpur P.S. Case No. 77 of 2010. It is expected from the investigation agency to complete the investigation expeditiously. It is also expected from Superintendent of Police, Kaimur at Bhabua not allow the petitioners and others to go near the hermitage or to create any disturbance till the trial is concluded or any order in favour of the petitioners is being passed by any competent Court. Let the trial Court try to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible on submission of final form, if the petitioners default for three consecutive occasions, the learned court below will at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioners. Safik (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)