IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 1816 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 14/10/2008 in WP NO : 20791 OF 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: M/s. Avenir Power Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Represented by its Managing Director Mr.P.Srinivas S/o. P.Vijay Kumar, Resident of G3, Samata Nilayam, Plot No.82, Srinagar Colony, Hyderabad-73. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 The Chairman and Managing Director, Northern Power Distribution Company, Hanumakonda, Warangal District. 2 Northern Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd. (APNPDCL) Warangal, represented by its Chief General Manager, (P&MM), Door No. 1-1- 504, Opp: REC Petrol bunk, Chaitanyapuri, Hanumakonda, Warangal - 506 004. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: MR.M.P.CHANDRAMOULI Counsel for the Respondents: MR.O.MANOHER REDDY The Division Bench of this Court made the following : (Judgment follows 2nd page) THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO. 1816 OF 2008 J U D G M E N T : ( Per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) This writ appeal is filed against the order dated 14-10-2008 in WP.No.20791 of 2008 passed by the learned single Judge, whereby she dismissed the writ petition by observing that even assuming that there is breach of any of the terms and conditions of the contract, the remedy of the parties is elsewhere but they cannot seek enforcement of the non-statutory contract by invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and on that ground alone the writ petition was dismissed leaving it open to the petitioner therein to work out the appropriate remedy before the proper forum. Aggrieved thereby, the present writ appeal is filed. 2. When the matter came up today, Sri M.P. Chandramouli, the learned counsel for the appellant sought permission of this Court to withdraw this writ appeal. 3. Permission accorded. 4. The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. . ________________________ JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI . ______________________________ JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY. 10/2/2009. I s L ........REGISTRAR To 1. 2.2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WA {TRK}