IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11196 of 2005 MANAGING COMMITTEE OF RAM PRAKASH SANSKRIT PRATHMIK SAH UCHCHA VIDHALAYA, Harbhanga, P.S. Madhopur- Lakhanpur, District Madhubani, through its Secretary Rajeshwar Prasad Singh son of Ram Prakash Singh, resident of village Harbhanga, P.S. Jhargarpur, Lakhanpur, District Madhubani … Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary cum Commissioner, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2. The Special Director, Secondary Education (Sanskrit)Department of Human Resources Development, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3. Deputy Director, Secondary Education (Sanskrit) Department of Human Resources Development, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 4. The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board through its Secretary, Boaring Canal Road, Patna 5. The Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Boring Canal Road, P.S. Budha Colony, Patna 6. The Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Boring Canal Road, P.S. Budha Colony, District Patna 7. District Officer, Madhubani 8. District Education Officer, Madhubani 9. Sub-divisional Education Officer, Jhanjharpur, District Madhubani … Respondents. ----------- 2. 18.1.2010 No one appears for the petitioner. Counsel for the Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board is present. The prayer of the petitioner in this writ application reads as follows: “This writ application is directed against the order dated 6.5.2005 passed in Appeal No. 3/05 by respondent Dy. Director cum appellate authority whereby and whereunder the respondent no.3 has been pleased to reject the 2 petitioner’s appeal filed against the order dated 14.12.2004 whereby the respondent Secretary has been pleased to reject the petitioner’s application for grant of recognition to the petitioner’s school on the basis of the report dated 11.12.2004 submitted by District Officer, Madhubani, erroneously. This writ application is also directed against the office order contained in Memo No. 7409 dated 14.12.2004 issued under the signature of respondent Secretary of the Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board (hereinafter referred to as the Board) whereby the petitioenr’s application for grant of recognition of the school has been rejected on the basis of a vague and criptic report purposefully in order to evade the displeasure of this Hon’ble Court and also to victimize the petitioner whose writ application has compelled the respondent Secretary to confine in court for a couple of hour on 13.12.2004. This application is also being filed for a direction to the respondents to grant recognition to the petitioner’s school in terms of the non-government Sanskrit School (Recognition and condition) Regulation 1993 as also on the 3 basis of the facts and circumstances. This writ application is also being filed for other reliefs as well.” From the reading of the writ application and the impugned orders dated 14.12.2004 as affirmed by the appellate authority on 6.5.2005 it would be found that the prayer of the petitioner for recognition of his school was rejected on the ground of non-fulfilment of certain mandatory requirements, such as school having no building, Library etc as also other infra structure. The sufficiency of such reasonings cannot be gone into in a writ application and therefore, this Court would hold that there is no flaw in the impugned orders. That being so, this application is misconceived and is, accordingly, dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/