HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR D.B.: HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR slNHA & HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE RADHE SHYAM SHARMA WRIT PETlTlON (C) NO.5985I2011 PETITKONER RESPONDENTS 1 M/s.0m Solutions, a partnership firm constituted under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, having its principar office at 4/1, Chittod Complex, Zone 1,M‘P.Nagar, Bhopa! (MR) through its partner, Shantanu Pandey, S/o Shri G.K. Pandey, aged about 41 years, R/o 28, Sham!a Road. Bhopal (MR) Versus State of Chhattlsgarh, Through its Secretary, Department of Transport, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) Department of Transport, Through its Transport Commissioner, New Bus Stand Parisar,Pandari, Raipur (C.G.) WRET PETlTlON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance : Mr. Prashant Jaiswal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anshuman Shrivastava, Counsel for the petitioner. Mr. A.S. Kachhwaha, Dy. Adi/ocate General for the respondents. ORAL ORDER (24.11.2011) order of the Courtrwas passed by The following Sunii Kumar Sinha, J. lgo 7 WRKT PETiTiON (C) N0.5985l2011 Heard. Mr. Jaiswa! submits that after filing of the writ petition, the respondents have issued memo dated 12.10.2011 and the petitioner has fiied reply to the said memo on 13.10.2011, therefore. a negotiation has taken place between the petitioner and the respondents, but no finai decision has taken piace tilt date. ln light of the above subsequent developments, he seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a representation before the respondents to take final decision in the matter. The copies of memo dated 12.10.2011 and reply thereof dated 13.10.2011 have been placed before this Court. ln light of the above, permission is granted to the petitioner to make a fresh representation to the respondents and with the above liberty, the writ petition stands finally disposed of at this stage with further liberty to come to this Court once again if future developments so warrant. Sd/- Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha R.S. Sharma Judge Judge