1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2552 OF 2005 Prerna P.Bhanu. ..Petitioner. V/s. Pravin C.Bhanu & Anr. ..Respondents. Mr.P.M.Havnur for petitioner. Mr.R.More, APP for State. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : DECEMBER 1, 2005. DATE : DECEMBER 1, 2005. DATE : DECEMBER 1, 2005. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. As alternative efficacious remedy is available to the petitioner by way of revision before the Sessions Court in view of the decision of this Court in the case of V.K.Jain & Ors vs. Pratap V.K.Jain & Ors vs. Pratap V.K.Jain & Ors vs. Pratap V.Padode V.Padode V.Padode reported in 2005(3) Mh.L.J. 778, 2005(3) Mh.L.J. 778, 2005(3) Mh.L.J. 778, no interference is warranted. The Counsel for the petitioner fairly prays for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to take recourse to remedy of revision. Hence dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. All questions are left open. 2. The petitioner to file such Revision Application within four week from today. Till such time, no precipitative action be taken against the 2 petitioner. Revision Application, if filed within four weeks from today, be considered on its own merits in accordance with law. 3. In case, there is any delay in filing Revision Application, Court will take into account the fact that the petitioner had first approached this Court, which period may be excused in computing delay. 4. Petition disposed of on the above terms.