1 lgc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1230 OF 2010 Ashok Dagu Niphad and anr : Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra & ors. : Respondents. Mr. M S Karnik for the Petitioners. Mr. S N Pati, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. S J Rairkar for Respondent No.3. CORAM : A. M. KHANWILKAR, R. M. SAVANT, JJ. DATED : 22nd April 2010 P.C. : 1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. Having regard to the contents of the reply affidavit dated 9th March 2010, filed by Vitthal Govind Sonawane and the further affidavit dated 22nd April 2010 of Mangesh Vasant Mohite, the counsel for the Petitioners, in all fairness, states that since the position stated in the affidavits is indisputable, the controversy raised in this petition will have to be necessarily answered against the Petitioners. Hence the Petition is dismissed. 2 3. Needless to observe that dismissal of this petition will not preclude the Petitioners from raising any dispute regarding voters list if any. That will have to be considered on its own merits in accordance with law. The present controversy is only regards to the decision of the Election Commission regarding formation of law. (R.M.SAVANT, J.) (A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.)