IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.462 of 2008 MADAN RAI & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 07.05.2008 After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. Looking at the nature of allegation and evidence which has emerged, this Court is not inclined to enlarge petitioner no.2 Surendra Rai on anticipatory bail. However, petitioner no.1 the father of petitioner no.2 deserves indulgence because nothing much has been said or stated about him even by the victim under the 164 statement recorded by the Magistrate. In view of the above, in the event of his arrest/surrender within four weeks from today, let the petitioner namely Madan Rai, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of the sum of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Samastipur in connection with Sarairanjan P.S. Case No. 78/2007 subject to conditions under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Rajeev/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) 2