T^'"', 3y .^ L^: sls StSS^ IN THE HIGH COURT QFJUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITQN NQ. 4- lc^ 2004, PETITIONERS: 1) -T°^ ^ .^^ ^^ f^y s»-' ^•' »i?iP'^ »v <^ c/,v\ 2) 3) MITHILA PRASAD S/0- SHRI RAM DAS AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS AISSTANT SOB INSPECTOR POLICE COLONY, MANSI A/4 DANTEWADA DISTT- DANTEWADA (C.G.) VEER BHADUR S/0- GANPAT SINGH AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS ASSISTANT SUB INSPECTOR P.S.- CHINTALNAR VILLAGE- SUKMA DISH- DANTEWADA (C. G.) SHYAM DUTT DWIVEDI S/0- BIMU PRASAD DWIVEDI AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS ASSISTANT SUB INSPECTOR P.S.- CHINTAGUPHA DISTT- DANTEffADA (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^•^> •' 1) UNION OP INDIA THROUGH- SECRETARY, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND GOVERNMENT OP INDIA 2) STATE OP CHHATTISGARH THROUGH : SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME (POLICE) RAIPUR(C. G.) HBB- c^ 4) STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT O HOME (POLICE) BHOPAL (M.P.) 4) INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BASTAR RANGE, JAGDALPUR (C.G.) 5) DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTER, RAIPUR (C.G.) 6) SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE DANTEWADA, DISTT- DANTEWADA (C. G.) TOIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. l.\._DAnlTIT/~*lTT r>r>Q—£LT>mtn"- 's^l •^ii^id^, ®Til'<-i<i(o,jsidi'y^ MWl.l^l.... •snt a-il! Pathak ^raferih tiroaf'? fe^ ^fSr^R ^aifwrant^ lilO PanU hestrin petitio4ers prays 13-12-a004 ShriY.C. Sharma, coimsefll Shri Rajnish Singh Bagh^ fhe Union oflndia/respondent Shri Sudhir Agrawal, AppUcatiou for urgent Heard. Coimsel for the relates to allocatk)n of petitione^ simflar inatter Le. W.P.No.l Mishia aad others -vs- Union been passed by this Court on 1J copy offhe order dated 18.6.; (Jitendra Siagh Toxnar and others), Learaed counsel passed in this case also. Leamed counscl for the r^ to d^pute fhe slatenient xnade inay be passed. Havine considered fhe case, material on recoid arid by counsel for the petitioners judginent/orders cited above the action of the State petitioners cannot be entifled for relieving. The the petitioneis withiu 15 days copy of this order. Accordiagly, this petition Consequentiy, M.W.P.I disposed of. Certi&ed copy as per rulei submits that the matter ae^s. He farther submits fhat in .5]78/2004 (Balendra Shekhar ojf India aad others) orders have '. 12.2003. He also produced a 2(^04 passed m W.P. 1560/2004 otbers -vs- Union of India aad that similflr order inay be for the petitioners. 1, Addl. Stgndiag Counsel for 1 on advaace copy. Lawyer for fhe State. -ing is aUowed, ^spondents is not in a position laad states that similar orders fdcts aud circuoistances of the c^nsideriiig the statenient inade bt the Bar aud in view of fhe furfher the legal position, m. n.0t reUeviag the and the petitioners are pi)>ndents arc directed to reUeve fhe date of production of a 4nd Autborities sustayied respi)>ndents &oin ^tauds disposed of. 14531/2004 also J-_ Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge stands I=ESS5Q^12ffll.QQ^.50,800.