IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE THURSDAY, THE 27TH MARCH 2008 / 7TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 10370 of 2008(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ K.K.RAMLA, W/O.MOIDEEN I.T. AGED 32 YEARS, ILLIKATHODI HOUSE MOOCHIKKAL, VALLUVAMBRAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.M.P.MADHAVANKUTTY RESPONDENT: ------------- THE MALAPPURAM MUNICIPALITY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV.MR.BABU S.NAIR, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 10370 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated: 27th March, 2008 JUDGMENT Not admitted. Adv.Mr.Babu S.Nair, Standing Counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondent-Municipality. 2. The prayer in this Writ Petition is the Municipality be directed to issue building permit to the petitioner with regard to his property situated in R.S.No.474/9B in panakkad village having an extent of 14.5 cents in the light of Exts.P2 and P3. The Standing Counsel has no objection in the Municipality being so directed on the basis Exts.P2 and P3 orders. Under these circumstances, I dispose of the Writ Petition directing the respondent-Municipality to take into account Exts.P2 and P3 and to reconsider the revised plan submitted by the petitioner and pass orders on the petitioner's application for building permit. The currency of the sanctioned development plan or the zoning regulations shall not be a ground for rejecting the building permit application if the same is otherwise in order. srd PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE