:?^""s^^ J^. .KNo. Sahdev Ram. Dhruv, s/o Late Shri. Kawal Singh Dhruv, Aged about 37 years, Presently posted as Superiiitendent Boys/Girls Kamar Ashram Dugli aud Singhpur (pre-metric hostel), Block- Na^ri/ Magarlod, District-Dham.tari(CG) State of Chliatdsgarli Through: Secretarv Tribal Welfare Department, DKS Bhawaa, Raipur(CG). The Comiuissioner, Tribal Welfare Departinent, Chhattisgarh Goverrunent, Raipur (CG) The CoUector (Tribal Welfsu-e), District Dhamtari (CG) The Asst. Coinmissioner, Tribal Welfare Departruent, District Dhaiutari (CG) Snit. Damyanti Kashi, w/o Maxuiu Kasbi, aged about 37 years, Sluksha Karmi Grade-III, Middle School Siaghpur, Block-Magarload, District Dhamtari(CG) Shri A.S.Rajput, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Dy. Govemment for the State on advaace copy. Heard. The petitioner who is workillg on fhe post of Superintendent, Pre-metric Scheduled Caste Girls Hostel, Siaghpur, Block Nagri, District- Dhamtari has challenged fhe validity of order dated 18.8.2007(Aimexure P/3J, Issued by fhe Collector, Dhanitari. The aforesaid order has been passed oa fhe ground fhat he was found absent at fhe time of iaspection of 18.8.2007 and also that fhe students stated that fhe ^ W.P'^No. 6335 of2007 'f2^ pedtioner com.es ouly once m a week iu the institution, therefore, fhe petitioner was negligent ia bis duties. Learaed counsel for fhe petitioner ai^ues that on ftie said date, fhe petitioner was present ia a different iastitution which is also under his cbarge. He refers to Annexure P/4. He also submits fliat the petitioner regularly goes to the Hostel and £he allegations raade ia fhe suspension order are false. Admittedly, fhese are fh.e factual aspects of the inatter aad the writ Court should not go into such aspects. Moreover, fh.e order has not been chatlenged on the ground ofjuiisdiction etc. and there is a provision of statutory appeal in ttie rules known as Chhattisgarh Civil Seryices (Classification Coutrol & Appeal) Rules, 1966. In view of fhe above, I ara. not incluied to admit this petition for hearing. This petition is disposed of at fhis stage. However, the petitioner shall be free to avail the statutoiy remedy available under tlie law. Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge /.