THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.4120 of 2007 Dated:09.10.2007 Between 1.B.Eswaraiah and another. ..Petitioners and 1. The Managing Director, APSRTC Bus Bhavan, Musheerabad, Hyderabad and others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.4120 of 2007 ORDER: Learned counsel on either side fairly conceded that the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by a Judgment of the Apex Court in Divisional Manager, APSRTC v. P.Lakshmoji Rao[1] and therefore, this writ petition may be disposed of in terms of the above Judgment. The operative portion of the judgment of the Apex Court reads as under: “In view of this peculiar situation and in order to avoid the anomalies that might otherwise ensue, while we hold that the respondent employees have failed to establish their legal right to get the status of regular employees right from the date of their initial appointment on daily-wage basis and the respective dates of regularization assigned to the respondents cannot be legally faulted, we are inclined to mould the relief in modification of the directions given in the judgments under appeal and direct as follows: If any of the conductors, junior to the respondents in the relevant seniority list of the concerned Division/Religion, have got the benefit of seniority and regulation or are entitled to get the same by virtue of the judgments that have become final, then the respondents who are seniors to them, shall be given the same benefit on the same principle.” The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the said judgment. __________ 09-10-2007 rkk [1] (2004) 2 Supreme Court Cases 433