IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.20795 of 2010 SUKHDEO RAJAK & ORS Versus MOSTT.CHANDARIKA DEVI & ORS ----------- 02. 10.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Preliminary decree has been passed and no order for setting aside the decree has been moved by the defendant rather an application for adducing additional evidence relating to title has been filed which is not permissible under law. This aspect has not been considered by the trial-court, therefore, the impugned order of the trial-court is set aside. The trial- court is directed to decide the application afresh after giving full opportunity to both the parties. Mkr. ( Prakash Chandra Verma, J. )