IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 27TH MAY 2008 / 6TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 8522 of 2008(M) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- P.K. KUNJUSAKUTTY, S/O MOIDEEN KUTTY, PILAKKATTIL HOUSE, ALATHIYUR, THIRUR, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.JAYACHANDRAN, ADV. SMT.KEERTHI SOLOMON. RESPONDENT: ---------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.V. MANOJ KUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/05/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.8522/2008-M: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE APPLICATION DTD. 16/11/2006. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE ORDER NO. C8/42714/06 DTD. 06/11/2006. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 8522 OF 2008 - M = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 27th May, 2008. J U D G M E N T The complaint in this writ petition is regarding the alleged non-consideration of Ext. P1 application made for revision of petitioners own timings. Petitioner submits that in reply to his application he has received Ext. P2 issued on 6.11.2006, though his application itself is dated 16.11.2006. When this submission was made, referring to the instruction that has been received, the learned Govt. Pleader submitted that the date indicated in Ext. P2 is a mistake and that the actual date is 24.11.2006. 2. Since on 24.11.2006, order on Ext. P1 has already been passed in the manner as indicated above, I do not see any justification for issuing any direction as sought for. Writ petition fails and is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-