IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24938 of 2008 KUNAL KUMAR @ KUNAL RAUT Versus STATE OF BIHAR For the petitioner : Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Umesh Prasad Singh, APP ----------- 4 19.12.2008 Heard. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under section 392 of Indian Penal Code. Although F.I.R. has been lodged against unknown but it appears that the petitioner was put on T.I.P. and identified by one witness. Counsel for the petitioner submits that at best it can be said to be a case of single identification. It has further been submitted that petitioner is in custody since 13.12.2007. Counsel for the petitioner produced certain depositions of the P.Ws in order to show that there is apparent contradictions in the evidence that have been led before the Trial Court. However this Court, considering the fact that the Trial is underway, is not, for the present inclined to admit the petitioner to bail. His application for bail stands rejected. However considering the period of incarceration, this Court observes that Trial Court will try to conclude the trial itself by 30th April, 2009 failing which the petitioner is granted liberty to renew his prayer for bail. pkj (Kishore K. Mandal, J) - 2 -