1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9794/2009 Jagdish Chandra Jat Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of order : 20.10.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mrs. Nupur Bhati, for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner's services have been terminated vide order dated 11.8.2009. Admittedly, the services were contractual services, however, the contract was extended. The petitioner was removed from service vide order dated 11.8.2009 wherein it has been mentioned that in inquiry, the petitioner was found guilty. The contention of the petitioner is that no inquiry was conducted and no order was passed holding the petitioner guilty and if any order is passed then it has never been communicated to the petitioner. The petitioner placed on record one document as Annex.32. From that document it appears that petitioner was made aware about the complaints against the petitioner and petitioner gave his reply to all those complaints/charges. The petitioner has not placed on record the copy of the order by which he was declared guilty inspite of the fact that in the order dated 11.8.2009 it is mentioned that in inquiry the petitioner was found guilty. In view of the above reason that the services of the petitioner was contractual, he was given opportunity of 2 hearing and he tried to explain the charges against him and yet he has not placed on record any order passed against him and obviously has not challenged the order holding him guilty, there is no merit in this writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed. [PRAKASH TATIA], J. cpgoyal/-