IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7479 of 2005 MEENAKSHI NARAIN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 5 13.08.2008 Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the University. Pursuant to the order dated 23.07.2008 the Finance Officer of the University is present in Court to render his assistance. He has explained the calculation made by him for grant of pension to the petitioner on account of death of her husband in harness. Counter affidavit has also been filed on behalf of the respondent no. 2 and 3 today, in which the calculation has been also annexed as Annexure- A. As per the calculation, an amount of Rs.3,49,085/- became due to the petitioner which has been credited in the account of the petitioner through cheque no. 667840 dated 09.08.2008. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the affidavit has been served on him today in Court and therefore, he will seek instruction from his client as to whether the said amount has been actually 2 credited in his account. He also submits that he could not get time to check the calculation, therefore, he accepts the statements made in the supplementary counter affidavit, subject to verification of the calculation. In that view of the matter, since no other claim of the petitioner subsists in the case, this application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Finance Officer, if it is found that any calculation mistake has cropped up in payment of pension vide Annexure- A. With the aforesaid liberty this writ application is disposed of. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)