hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 422 OF 2011 Shamrao Mulke ... Petitioner Versus Vasantdada Shetkari Sahakari Bank Ltd. and Ors. ... Respondents Mr.Umesh Mankapure for the petitioner. Mr. S.N. Bhosale, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 5 to 7. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATED : JUNE 27, 2011 P.C. Heard Mr. Mankapure for the petitioner. Perused the order under challenge. The Divisional Joint Registrar, Kolhapur has condoned the delay of 55 days in filing the revision application. The Divisional Joint Registrar has given reasons and has come to the conclusion that there is sufficient cause for not approaching the authority earlier. In the light of this, the discretionary exercise does not appear tobe arbitrary or capricious calling for interference under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition is devoid of merits and it is dismissed with no costs. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.)