1 SB Civil Writ Petition No.856/2009 M/s. Singh & Associates. vs. State of Raj. & Anr. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.856/2009 M/s. Singh & Associates. vs. State of Rajasthan and another. Date : 4.2.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Ms.Rekha Borana, for the petitioners. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner/plaintiff sought relief of injunction against the recovery of Rs.40,288/- and that injunction was refused by the trial court vide order dated 18.5.2007 and the appellate court dismissed the appeal of the plaintiff vide order dated 17.5.2008. Hence, this writ petition. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the respondents did not hand over the possession of the land in question and, therefore, he could not start the work in pursuance of the work contract. It is submitted that absolutely illegally recovery has been sought from the 2 SB Civil Writ Petition No.856/2009 M/s. Singh & Associates. vs. State of Raj. & Anr. petitioner for Rs.40,288/-. It is submitted that before that, the quantum has not been determined. I considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the reasons given by the two courts below. Two courts below have considered the facts in detail. In addition to the above, I do not find that the petitioner can suffer any irreparable injury in case, the injunction is not granted to the petitioner. In view of the above, there is no merit in the writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya