IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWPs No. 7594, 7496, 7789 and 7792 of 2010. Decided on: 15th December, 2010. 1. CWP No.7594 of 2010. Surinder Kumar. vs. State of H.P. & others. 2. CWP No.7596 of 2010. Hem Singh. vs. State of H.P. & others. 3. CWP No.7789 of 2010. Dhani Ram. vs. State of H.P. & others. 4. CWP No.7792 of 2010. Kundan Lal. vs. State of H.P. & others. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. Vijender Katoch, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: CWP No. 7594 of 2010. “(i) That the respondents be directed to grant notional work charge/regularization to the petitioner with all service benefits including seniority, arrears in back wages, pay fixation w.e.f. 19th May, 2003. CWP No. 7596 of 2010. (i) That the respondents be directed to grant notional work charge/regularization to the petitioner with all service benefits including seniority, arrears in back wages, pay fixation w.e.f. 31st May, 2003. 2 CWP No. 7789 of 2010. (i) That the respondents be directed to grant notional work charge/regularization to the petitioner with all service benefits including seniority, arrears in back wages, pay fixation w.e.f. 20th September, 2003. CWP No. 7792 of 2010. (i) That the respondents be directed to grant notional work charge/regularization to the petitioner with all service benefits including seniority, arrears in back wages, pay fixation w.e.f. 16th July, 2004. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the cases are squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered in CWP No. 2735 of 2010 titled as Rakesh Kumar and others vs. State of H.P. and others decided on 28th July, 2010 and the decision of the Apex Court in Mool Raj Upadhyaya vs. State of H.P., 1994 Supp. (2) SCC 316. Therefore, it is for the petitioners to approach the first respondent within a period of one month, in which case the matter will be duly considered by the first respondent in the light of the judgments, referred to above and appropriate action in accordance with law will be taken within another four months from the date of receipt of the representation along with a copy of this judgment and the copies of the judgments, referred to above. 3. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 15th December, 2010 (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tr) Judge. 3 4