IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16007 of 2011 DHARMBIR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 22.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Informant’s driver was killed and his truck was taken away. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner’s name appeared only in confession made by co-accused, Manoj and similarly situated co-accused, Mritunjay Kumar Singh has been allowed bail by a Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 37403 of 2010. But one of the prosecution witnesses examined in paragraph-21 has named this petitioner as one of the dacoits and claims to remain present while dacoity was committed. There is no reason to disbelieve the witnesses though submission is that once the incident is witnessed by any person that should appear in F.I.R. may be of some substance, if there is every chance of his coming in contact with the informant before filing of the F.I.R. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for bail is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)