1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Appeal against Order No.123 of 2008 (Smt. Ranjana w/o Udhaorao Dhabarde v. Shri Nilkanth s/o Tanba Pazare) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri A.M. Ghare, Advocate for Appellant. Shri K.R. Lambat, Advocate for Respondent Coram : R.C. Chavan, J. Dated : 24 th June, 2009 1. This appeal is directed against the order of the learned Additional District Judge rejecting the original plaintiff’s application for injunction to restrain the defendant from alienating the suit property or creating any third party interest, during the pendency of defendant’s appeal.. 2. The learned counsel for the respondent (original defendant) states that the respondent has no intention as of now to sell the property or to create any third party interest. He further states that if the hearing of the appeal is expedited, it will serve his purpose, and if during the pendency of the 2 appeal there is an occasion for the respondent to sell the property or to create third party interest, that shall not be done without obtaining the leave of the Court, which will grant it after hearing the appellant. 3. In view of this, the appeal is disposed of. The learned counsel for the appellant states that the appellant (respondent before the District Court) would file a paper book before the Appellate Court within four weeks from today. The learned District Judge shall endeavour to dispose of the appeal within three months thereafter. Both the learned counsel agree that they will instruct their clients and counter-parts in the Appellate Court not to seek any adjournment. 4. With these directions, the appeal is disposed of. Judge. pdl