1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.62 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4849 OF 2009 Kishore S/o Anandrao Bhoyar Vs. State of Maharashtra and another ................................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................ Shri C.M.Munje, counsel for the petitioner. Shri A.M.Ghare, counsel for Intervener. Shri A.M.Deshpande, AGP for the R-1. CORAM : R. K.DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 27th APRIL, 2011. This Court had passed an order on 23.6.2010 directing the respondent no.3 to release the grants for the year 2006-07 and 2007-08 and to decide the claims on merit in accordance with law. The present contempt petition has been filed complaining disobedience of this order. It is alleged that the grant for the 2006-07 and 2007-08 have not been released. .....2/- 2 In response to notice issued in this contempt petition, an affidavit has been filed by the respondent no.2 and in para-7 of the affidavit it has been stated, that the payment/demand draft is prepared in the name of the Secretary and the President of the petitioner institution. There is dispute between the Secretary and the President of the petitioner institution and hence, both the rival parties are claiming that the demand draft should be deposited in different accounts. It is also the stand taken, in the affidavit filed by the respondent no.2, that the President of the institution has filed Writ Petition No.1213 of 2011 and has prayed to release of grant/claim in the name of the President of the petitioner trust. In view of this, it is apparent that there is a dispute between the Secretary and the President of this society, both are submitting that the demand draft should be deposited in the account, which they are operating. Since the dispute is pending before this Court in Writ Petition No.1213 of 2011, the parties are at .....3/- 3 liberty to obtain appropriate orders in the said writ petition for depositing of the amount. However, so far as the compliance of the order is concerned, since the demand draft has already been prepared, the order has been complied. In view of this, there is no substance. The contempt petition is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE BrWankhede ...../-