IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16253 of 2009 BALDEO MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 14.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that in the FIR there is no allegation against the petitioner rather using of nalkatua by Baidhnath Mahto and Yugal Kishore Mahto. In course of evidence the petitioner has been alleged for causing assault by means of lathi. If that is found sufficient for the accusation that never can be taken for refusal of the anticipatory bail. I agree with the submission. Prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two surteties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri H.N.Tiwari, Additional Sessions Judge, 1st, Sitamarhi, in Sessions Trial no. 259 of 1995 arising out of Dumra P.S. case no. 23 of 1995. (Mandhata Singh, J.) AI