1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Bail Application No. 7821/2010 Shanaz Bano Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 20.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr RR Sharma - for the petitioner Mr Amit Poonia - Public Prosecutor BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a lady and if the statement of the prosecutrix recorded under section 164 CrPC is taken note of then it has come that prosecutrix went with one Bunty and so far as petitioner is concerned, she has not been assigned any role for causing offence. Bunty has already been granted bail under section 438 CrPC. Case of the petitioner stands on better footing to that of Bunty. Looking to aforesaid, petitioner may be granted bail. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail 2 application. After considering rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am of the view that petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is accepted and it is directed that accused-petitioners namely; Shanaz Bano may be enlarged on bail under section 439 CrPC in FIR No.170/2007 registered at Police Station – Udyog Nagar, Kota for offence under Section/s 363, 366, 120-B IPC provided, she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.40,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for her appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma