IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-33900 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.11.2011 Alvir Singh ….Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. B.D. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Nehra, Addl. A.G., Punjab. NAWAB SINGH, J. (ORAL) Quashing of First Information Report No.45 dated February 27th, 2005 under Sections 148,441,447 and 506 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, Police Station Sadar, District Jalandhar and order dated August 28th, 2009 (Annexure P1) passed by Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jalandhar, whereby warrants of arrest were issued against the petitioner, is sought by filing this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner confines his submission to the contention that order (Annexure P1) be set aside. 3. By order dated November 14th, 2011, this Court passed the following order: - “XXXX On August 28th, 2009, petitioner along with his co- accused Gurpreet Singh was absent. Warrants of arrest were issued against them. Gurpreet Singh filed Criminal Misc. No.3657 of 2011 before this Court, in which, he was directed to appear before the trial Court and trial Court was also directed to release him on bail to its satisfaction subject to payment of costs of Rs.10,000/- to be deposited with Punjab State Legal Services Authority vide order dated February 14th, 2011 passed by Daya Chaudhary, J. Gurpreet Singh has already been released on probation by trail Magistrate vide judgment dated February 26th, 2011 (Annexure P4). Learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that petitioner is also ready to surrender before the trial Court. The offences for which petitioner is facing trial are bailable. XXXXX Criminal Misc. No. M-33900 of 2011 -2- Meanwhile, petitioner shall appear before the trial Court on or before November 21st, 2011 and move an application for bail and the trial Court shall admit him to bail to its satisfaction till further orders.” 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has apprised this Court that pursuant to the aforesaid order, petitioner has appeared before the trial Court and trial Magistrate has admitted him to bail vide order dated November 18th, 2011 (Annexure P7). 5. In this view of the matter, petition has become infructuous and is dismissed as such. 6. Disposed of accordingly. (NAWAB SINGH) JUDGE 23.11.2011 Ishwar