IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.319 of 2008 Between: Kadali Narasimha Murthy ..... PETITIONER(S) AND Pericharla Sita Rama Raju and another .....RESPONDENT(S) HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.319 of 2008 ORDER: Petitioner who is the 1st Judgment Debtor filed this revision under Section 115 of C.P.C. assailing the correctness of the orders passed in the Execution Petition filed by the respondents/decree holders for recovery of money. This Court at the time of admission of this revision granted stay of arrest of the petitioner on 07.02.2008 on condition of his depositing half of the decreetal amount and costs within a period of two weeks therefrom. It is stated that the petitioner has deposited the said amount and the respondents/decree holders have withdrawn the same. In view of the submission and especially having regard to the fact that the impugned order came to be passed only after holding an inquiry wherein both parties have let in evidence which goes to show that the petitioner has not evinced any interest to pay the decreetal debt, there is no merit in the revision. The revision petition is accordingly dismissed. However, the petitioner is permitted to deposit the remaining half of the decreetal amount within four weeks from today and on such deposit the respondents/decree holders shall be at liberty to withdraw the same without furnishing any security. No costs. ____________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J 24th June, 2010 CVRK