c^- EN TIIE HON'BLE fflGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETJTION^No. 36 PETFTIONERS ^ ./^ ^^y ^fW !%yy ^•@v" .^' <-<.' .<t'1 V ^ -^- ^ ^ffe^'ss^, //'•- v-'^ —-"^"<^??\. ^/'""'%•, A /201(^ SB 1. Petrus Ekka, S/o Late Shri.Francis Ekka aged about-46 years, Lower Division Teacher. R/o-VimaI Vidya Ashram lir. Sec. School, Mariguda. Chiurgaon, Bakawand (Via) Bastar-District(CG) 2. TelespIiore-Rlvka. S/o Shri. Patras Ek]<a ayed aboLit-47 years, Lower Division Teacher, R/o-Vimal Vidya Ashram Hr. Sec. School, Mariguda. Chiurgaon, Bakawand (Via) Bastar-District(CG) .). Smt. Salomi Barla , W/o Shri. Theophil Baria. aged about-45 years, Lower Division Teacher. R/o-Vimal Vidya Ashram Hr. Sec. School, Marigudii. Chiurgaon, Bakawand (Via) Bastar-District(CG) 4. Kalyp.n Kujtir, S/o Shri. Joseph Kujur a.ged cbout-60 vears. Lovver Division Teacher, Ryo-Vimal Vidya Ashram Hr. Sec. School, Mari.giida. Chiursaoii, Bakawand (Via) B<isiar-District(CG) 5. Smt.Mariam Kujur, W/o Sliri. M. Kujur aged about-40 years, Lower Division T'eacher, R/o-Vimal Vidya Ashram Hr. Sec. School, Mariguda. Chiurgaon, Bakavvand (Via) Bastar-District(CG) 6. Smt. Flefero T'oppo. W/o Shri. Benjamin Topoo agecl about-47 years, Lower Division Teacher. I</'o-Vimal 5 Vidya Ashram Hr. Sec. School, . Mariguda. Chiurgaon, Bakawand (Via) Bastar-Uistrict(CG) -7. Kii.l.isv f'liomas. D/o Shri.Thomas aged about-48 years, I-ower Division Teacher. R/o-Vimal Viclya Ashram Hr. Sec. School, Mariguda. Chiurgaon. Bakawand (Via) Bastar-District(CG) 8. Smt. Dhanai Baghel. D/o Shri.Madhu Baghel. ageci about-38 years. Lower Division Teacher. R/o-Vimal Vidya Ashram Hr. Sec. School, Mariguda. Cliiiirguon. Bakawand (Via) Bastar-[)istrict(CG) 9. Shashi Kumar M.N., S/o Shri.T.M Narayanan Nair, aged about-46 years, Cierk.(AG-2). ft/o-Vima] Viclva Asl'.ram l-1r. Sec. School. Mariguda. Chiurgaon, Bakawand (Via) Baslar-District(CG) RESPONDENTS •^ 1. TheState ofChhattis.garh Throu&h- The Secretarv. Schedule Caste. Schedule 'I'ribe and Backvvard ClassWell'areDepartment. O.K.S.Bhavvan.Mantralaya. District- Raipiir (C G) 2. TheCominissioner Tribal Wcliare Dcparlmenl. \^ Schedule Caste. Schedule Tribe Dcvelopment, District- Raipur (C G) 3. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Well'are Department Jagdalpur. District-Bastar (C G) 4. The Secretary, Vimal Vidya Ashram High School, Mariguda. Chir.aaon F'ost. Bakawand (Via) Bastar District, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ART1CL1: 226 OF THE CONST1TUTION OF INDIA, 1950 FOR THE 1SSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS ETC AND FOR THE APPROPRIATE ORDER/ORDERS, DIRECTION/ DIRECT10NS c HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.30 OF 2011 PETITIONERS Petrus Ekka & Others RESPONDENTS Versus The State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Azad Siddique, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Sushil Dubey, Govt. Advocate for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 7 day of January,'2011) 1. Grievance of the petitioners is that they are working in the 100% Government aided school, but have not been granted the full benefit of 5 pay scale. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the case of the petitioners is squarely covered with the case decided by this Court on 9-2-2007 in W.P.No.698 of 2006 and at this stage the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file proper representation before the respondent authorities. Learned further submits that a direction may be issued to the respondent authorities for deciding the representation of the petitioners expeditiously. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection if the petitioners make any such representation and the same is being decided in accordance with law. 4. Accordingly the petitioner is pe'rmitted to withdraw this petition with liberty as aforesaid. In the eventuality of making any such representation bythe petitionerwithina period ofone month from the date of receipt of a copy of this the same would be deiced by the competent authority within a further period of two months. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinionon merits ofthe case and the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the representation in accordance with law. ^- Gowri .t^ s^^e w^