IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.14003 of 2011 Date of Decision: August 04, 2011 Leela Yadav ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.A.S.Tewatia, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has approached the respondents for opening the G.P.F.Account and for arrears of pay. For the same cause, the petitioner has already served a legal notice, Annexure P- 8. Thereafter, the petitioner has sent a reminder, Annexure P-9. As per the counsel, despite that no action has been taken. Without going into the merits of the claim made, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the legal notice served by the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. August 04, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE