^> 1 ;• BEFORE THE M.P. STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL: BENCH RAIPUR. C-^fi'[^)rl&&alo_^_ O.A.No. ^3 /2001 APPL1CANT: VERSUS. Non-ADDlfcants: —7,Z3s&s/<5/ t Wed today.'y.. ...C;?.. -..l-?.l.„ bfShri-^d^:!^^ f:or Peglstfaf^ S.P.State A^en. Tnbasal, RAIfUR. ,\) Smt. Rita Bakshi, aged about 43 years, w/o Shri J.K. Bakshi, R/o 164/D, Rua- bandha Sector.Bhilai, Tahsil andDistnct Durg (C.G.) 1. StateofChUattisgarhthrough fhe Secretary, Dept. of Scliool Educatioii, Secre- tariate, D.K.Bhawan, Raipur, C.G. ' 2. Dist. Education Officer, Dur&.C.G. 3. The Principal, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Risali, Bhilai, Tahsil and District Durg,C.G. rector,^yblic Iggfi^i- Edu^tioii D^ision, )ist.^5urg. / APPLICATION U/SEC 19 OF THE ADMINISTRATrVE TREBUNAL ACT. 1985. DETAILS OF APPLICATION ' • £~^''-' , . .' '• ' .. 1. PARTICULARS OF THE ORDER AGAINST WHIGH THE APPL1CAT10N IS MADE :- The application is not made against aay specific orda- but against the general inaction on fhe part offlie non-applicants in not m^jng pay&sntof the salary to the applicant for fhe period fi-om 24.7.1995 to 181;8.1995andthea21.9.95 te 18.1.1996 ;<-A 31li?I^T R-li?h sf^v aiHitfi y^ti Sinha ?a ^^'^TRRPI,'S^twre. facll+iy STT^T xi5ra? ,^....M'.^..M5^i IINCTI 9iW* fcf'b<{ET' sn^r ewi<9? yf^a SB: Hon'ble Shri Maniadra Mihhan Shrivastava. J. 29.03.2010 Shri Prem Narayan, Advej Kinger, counsel for the petition^r - Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy. G(| In the retum, if has bee petitioner in the petition as <tii<it<'i<i1i iiicif ^ fs^S <F«ii< •^ srfsgiT 31^1 |cate appears on behalf of Shri Bhishma ^vt. Advocate for the State/respondents. |i stated that the salary claimed by the been paid. alrejady Petition has served its pu|cpose and therefQre finally disposed of. Sd^11..':.;.::: Ailarimdra Mohan Slu'ivastava Judge ^^"•-•^ [TT^ ^fe^