IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 6004 of 2008. Decided on: 16.06.2010. Dr. Yoginder Kumar Sharma. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): The grievance of the petitioner, in a nut-shell, is that though he was appointed on temporary basis w.e.f. 27.09.1986 to 06.07.1987 and regularized w.e.f. 07.07.1987, but the period of temporary service has not been counted for the purpose of release of Sr./Selection scale. The case of the petitioner was forwarded by the Principal vide Annexure P-5, dated 04.10.1997. 2. Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent-State has not taken any decision on the recommendations of the Principal. In these circumstances, the interest of justice will met if the respondents are directed to take a decision within some reasonable period. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to consider and decide the case of the petitioner in view of Annexure A-5, dated 4th October, 1997 within a period of six weeks from today. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge June 16, 2010. (bhupender)