IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No.20197 of 2011 Date of decision November 2 , 2011 M/s Bharat Rice Mill Naudhrani Road, Malerkotla ....... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ........ Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Aman Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. **** K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would be satisfied if the writ petition is treated as representation and is properly considered and appropriate orders be issued on the basis of the same. 2. As ordered. 3. The second respondent shall treat this writ petition as a representation of the petitioner and take appropriate decision in light of the judgment Annexure P-2 within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order. 4. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly dispensing with notice to the respondents. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE November 2, 2011 archana