THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Civil Revision Petition No.2268 of 2010 ORDER: This civil revision petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order dated 20.04.2010 passed in I.A.No.2256 of 2009 in O.S.No.95 of 1999, whereunder the learned I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner and respondents 4 to 8 herein, plaintiffs in the suit, praying to summon one Smt. Ratna Sudha and her vendors to give evidence in the suit. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent and perused the impugned order and other material available on record. As can be seen from the order under revision, the plaintiffs earlier filed application in I.A. No. 3373 of 2007 before the Court below, praying to implead the persons, whom they now want to be summoned as party defendants. The said I.A., by order dated 18.03.2008, was allowed by the Court below. Questioning the said order, the 1st respondent herein filed revision in C.R.P. No. 2187 of 2008, and this Court, by order dated 29.07.2009, allowed the C.R.P. and set aside the order passed by the Court below. This apart, the plaintiffs, appear to have not filed any list of witnesses, and filed the present application at the time when the evidence on behalf of the defendants is completed and the suit is coming up for arguments. If the present application is allowed, it virtually amounts to permitting the plaintiffs to achieve something indirectly, which they could not achieve directly. In fact, if the request of the plaintiffs is acceded to, it would virtually amount to granting the relief as prayed for by them in I.A. No. 3373 of 2007, which was refused by this Court in C.R.P. At any rate, the plaintiffs having not cited the persons sought to be summoned as witnesses and having not referred to the documents on which he wants to rely, no exception can be taken to the order passed by the Court below, refusing to allow the present application filed by the petitioner. For the foregoing reasons, this Court finds no reason whatsoever to interfere with the order under revision in exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The civil revision petition is devoid of merit and is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. __________________ JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA 23rd June, 2010 IBL