IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21791 of 2010 1. GUDDU RAM @ FIROJ KUMAR CHOPRA 2. Puja Devi 3. Raju Ram @ Brajesh Ram 4. Nitu Devi @ Gitanjali Kumari Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 15.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Tej Narayan Singh, learned counsel for the complainant. Petitioners are brothers and their wives of complainant’s husband though there is every allegation about demand and torture but in the case father-in-law and mother-in-law of the complainant are allowed bail. Gotni is standing on the footing of complainant herself their status in the family is similar to that of the complainant. Even than their prayer is rejected. Complainant is liability of her husband and demand, if any, can be made by parents of the husband. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 462C of 2009, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 2 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Nalanda subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)