1 CA-380-11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 380 OF 2011 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 91 OF 2011 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1038 OF 2010 IN SHORT CAUSE SUIT OF. 934 OF 2010 M/s. Om Builder Pvt.Ltd. & Anr. ... Appellants Vs. Tanil Kilachand & Ors. ... Respondents And Minal Sanjeev Desai & Anr. ... Applicants/Interveners Mr. A.Y.Bookwala, Senior Counsel, i/b. M/s. K.K.Associates, Advocates for the Applicants. Ms. ReenaSalunkhe, i/b. Shri Yadunath Chaudhari, Advocate for the appellant (in A.O.No.91/11) Shri Joseph Mistry i/b. RMG Law Associates,Advocates for the respondent No.1. Shri Atul Rajadhyaksha i/b. Ms. Veena Khatri, Advocate for the respondent No.2 (in A.O.No.91/11) and for the appellant (in A.O.No.92/11). Shri Karl Tamborly a/w Ms. Natasha Bopanish i/b. Bharucha & Partners for respondent Nos. 25 & 26 (in C.A. No.380/11) and respondent Nos. 26 & 27 (in C.A. No.381/11). CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 4th July, 2011. P.C. 1. The learned Counsel for the appellants has no objection allow this application for intervention. Therefore, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Amendment be effected within two weeks and A.O. be 2 CA-380-11.sxw listed for admission and hearing on 25.7.2011. Civil Application stands disposed of. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)