1 wp-873.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 873 OF 2010 Chandrakant P. Mirani & Anr. ... Petitioners. V/s. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others. ... Respondents. Dr.B.B.Saraf with Ms.Azomin Irani and Manish Doshi i/b. Vimadalal and Co. for the petitioners. Mrs.K.R.Panjabi for respondent No.1. K.P.Jain i/b. Niranjan & Co. for respondent Nol.4. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND R.M.SAVANT, JJ. DATED : 26th October 2010. P.C. : Perused petition. Heard learned counsel for the rival parties. 2. During the course of hearing, it is brought to our notice that in the pending suit, chamber summons was taken out by the present petitioners to get themselves impleaded. The said chamber summons was rejected and that order of rejection was accepted by the petitioners. Once that order was accepted by the petitioners, then in that event, they are estopped from saying that they were 2 wp-873.10 necessary party before the Corporation and ought to have been heard by the Corporation. The disputed question whether the construction was legal or illegal cannot be gone into in writ jurisdiction of this Court. Hence we do not propose to entertain this petition. 3. In the result, petition is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (R.M.SAVANT, J.) (V.C.DAGA J.)