9 BENC c-.-r.'03' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE. AT-BILASPURfC.G.l WRIT PETITION N0.4-s-8-e> QF 2005 PETITIONER ...^ .<^ ^z^y / ^'y^^"../ ^^ . .••" .^ °">^ ,.'• .";'yT\ •' Aa-'' ^"C^ <%: BHAGWAT PRASAD BHARTI AGED ABOUT - 40 YEARS, SON OF SHRI SANTOSH BHARTI ASSISTANTTEACHER AT - GOVT. MIDDLE SCHOOL, BOTALDA, BLOCK - KHARSIYA DISTRICT - RAIGARH (C. G.) R/0 VILLAGE - TELIKOT, TEHSIL - KHARSIYA, DISTRICT -RAIGARH (C.G.) ^- VERSUS RESPONDENTS < 1. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH - THE SECRETARY, TRIBAL WELFARE AND SCHEDULE CASTE DEVELOPMENT DEPT. MANTRALAYA, D.K.S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR ^ 2. THE COMMISSIONER, TRIBAL WELFARE AND SCHEDULE CASTE DEVELOPMENT DEPT. PT. R.S.U. CAMPUS, RAIPUR C.G. / 3. THE COLLECTOR, TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT BRANCH DISTRICT - RAIGARH (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE - / 226^& 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF_WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION. DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. ORDER OR ORDERS. XI-HC-78 dx.n '-oloirtAi, UTi1'(-l<l<?, Rril^y'< 'b^' +11*101 ^irq? 3n^9Tq^P(i^(j6|^) W^200 airtCTWTfSato awan^nsRqiw B^ITW 'dRd ssf^w 'ni<i[«<II»iHiinT't'fai^l '(Rl't^l't ^af^iOT^n Shri R.K. Shri Bhaskar yasi, Pas |amed counsel for the p< ;1 LaiFver for fhe State. The petitioner, who is :lle School, Botalda- Blo chaBenged his h'ansfer order been tTansfen'ed froia Botalda! Learaed counsel for fhe order is not in accordance traiisfen-ed to a particular Bl^ Slock Education OiEcer for ra; The Apex Court whfle d| workiiig as Assistant Teacher ui ;k Kha-rsiya District Raigarh has |iated 30/08/2005 by which he has Ito Block TamiiaT, loetitiouer submits fhat fhe a&resaid \wifh law as a Teacher carinot be |ick and be kept on ttie raercy of the kkiug his postiiig. ialing wifh the ruatter of Kendriya. ing to fhe arious decisions has obsen,red vide 4 as foUows: Traiister which is suil iaterfered with by fhe arbitrarv or vitiated t( prescribed nonns of pi of service is uot to be Cc^urts unless it is showii to be cle&j'ly iv inalafide or mfiaction of anv >i|inciples govemlng fhe transfer (See State ofOrrissaj. Uiiless tlie order of transfer is vitiated bvl operauve guideluies, fhe| uiala fide or is inade m violation of Court caanot iaterfere wifh it. (See Abbas). Who should be traiisferred aad posted where is a m[ to decide. Unless the orcl or is niade ia violation ofl Courts should not ordul atter for flle admuTistrafive: authority er of transfer is vitiated bv aiala fide .operative any guidelia.es or rules fhe larily iaterfere wifh it. In O'nion of Ini6a & others Va. Jaitordan Bebafiath &, emother, it was obser^ed as foUows: XI-HC-78 vii-c.Tl ^l^l'ri^, yTi1'<-i'lic»,Riwitiy^ TPRCT^tff^ •••""""""""""""""""^200 an^ST q3?p (yi(g<'i<g) sn^CT^CTfeito ?RIT31I^»T**fi* r^ ?T?iTm^if8;isii^»T Goverum.en't] uiidertaking has ai aiiy one particulai| traiisfer of a parti.c| or categcrv oi- tr^ anoftier is .not OE|I service, neces.saiy 1( fhe pubUc adinirus^ sfaown to be aii out to be iu violation oj such transfer, fhe| cannot iaterfere as though substitutinj eiaployee/ inaaagenj. iu the iuterest of concerned. This po| iii National Hydro\ Bhagwan." .Vllltl ::y their facts aa^ I am not inclm.ed to iaterfere ib xio sy <bl<l(d41'l *<l*ldl"4"fs»cl•(lui'«;i'{ 2Raif^I3ll^»T servaiit or eiuployee of a public ajiy legal right to be posted foreyer at place or place of bis choice siace !|ular einployee appointed to the class r^iisferable posts froia one place to |ly aii iacident, but a condition of >o in pubUc iaterest and efficiency in [ration. Unless aa order of transfer is tconie of mala-fide exercise or stated statutory provisions pmhibiting any Courfs or the Tribunals nonnallv such orders as a inatter of routuie, were fhe appeUate authorities own decision for ttiat of ttie as against such orders passed a<linuiistrative exigencies ot ttie service (sition was highlighted bv this Court 'Jectric Power Coron. Ltd. Vs. Shri circuDistances of fhis case, nt, Uie sajne is c[j _&.-... - - — Sd/- SunilKumarSinha Judge