IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33043 of 2010 PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 02.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner, namely, Pramod Kumar Singh apprehends his arrest in connection with Muzaffarpur Town P.S. Case No. 321 of 99(G.R. No-2228/99) registered under Seciton 379 of the I.P.C. and 39/44 of the Electricity Act. Allegedly, petitioner being the owner of Sugit Kumar Sugar Agency committed theft of electric energy causing damage to the concerned board to the tune of Rs. 2000/- It appears from perusal of the record as well as impugned order that the above stated damage has already been deposited by the petitioner with concerned board but the learned Sessions Judge rejected the prayer for anticipatory bail application of the petitioner only on the ground that petitioner has been charge sheeted. Considering the aforesaid facts, petitioner, namely, Pramod Kumar Singh, in the event of his arrest/surrender within thirty days from the date of communication of this order, shall be released on bail in connection with above stated Muzaffarpur Town P.S. Case No. 321 of 1999(G.R. No-2228/99) on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Muzaffarpur subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)