FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WP/117/2011 VIJAY ANKUSHRAO DEHADE V/S THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ... Shri M.S.Taur, Advocate h/f Shri Amol N. Kakade, Advocate for petitioner Shri S.D.Kulkarni, Advocate for respondents 2 & 3 Shri A.A.NImbalkar, Advocate h/f Shri V.D.Salunke, Advocate for respondent 4, Shri A.R.Kale, Advocate h/f Shri R.B.Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent 5 ... CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE & S.B.DESHMUKH,JJ. Dated : June 21, 2011 ... 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This Writ Petition, basically, challenges the selection of respondent No.4 for allotment of Rajeev Gandhi Gramin L.P.G. Distributor at Pimpri Raja, Taluka and District Aurangabad. 3. Learned counsel for respondent No.4 submits that the allotment of LPG distributorship has been cancelled and therefore, the petition has become infructuous. Learned counsel for respondents 2 and 3 confirms the cancellation. 4. In view thereof, nothing further survives in the Writ Petition. Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. (S.B.DESHMUKH, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) akl