FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2867 OF 2011 " Deepak Shankar Pawar Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. G.S. Rane, Advocate for petitioner. Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, Assistant Govt. Pleader for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Mr. V.D. Sapkal Advocate for respondent No.5. CORAM :- D.B. BHOSALE & S.B. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE :- 19TH JULY, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] Petitioner in the present writ petition, is seeking direction to respondent No.2 to register and decide the Review application, within time frame. The petitioner seems to have filed Review Application against the order dated 7/11/2010 passed in revision application filed by respondent No.5. The Review Application has been filed in January, 2011. 2] According to the petitioner, the Review Application is filed under clause 21(b) of the Maharashtra P.D.S. Kerosene wholesalers, Semi-wholesalers and Hawkers (Licensing) order, 2008. 3] Without entering into merits of the case, we are FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2867 OF 2011 " Deepak Shankar Pawar Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 satisfied that this petition can be conveniently disposed of by the following order :- : O R D E R : . [I] Respondent No.2 shall endeavour to dispose of the Review Application filed by the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within 6 months from the date of receipt of this order, on merits, in accordance with law and after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned including respondent No.5. . [II] All contentions of the parties are kept open. [III] Petitioner is directed to communicate this order to respondent No.2 within a period of 4 weeks from today. [iv] It is made clear that we have not examined the case of the petitioner on merits. With these observations, writ petition is disposed of. [S.B. DESHMUKH,J.] [D.B. BHOSALE, J.] grt/-