1 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application Nos. 1739/09, 1740/09, 1741/09, 1742/09 and 1743/09 (In Cri. Appeal No. 41/97) Sk. Chand Sk. Rehman Chaudhary & ors. v. St. of Maharashtra ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's and Registrar's orders orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Firdos Mirza Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. Shyam Ahirkar, AGPe for the Respdt. ..... CORAM: A.B.CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 01 st SEPTEMBER, 2009. Heard. In view of long lapse of time and the responsibilities on the appellant/ accused persons of their families with a further undertaking to be given by the applicants to the District Probation Officer about maintaining good conduct for stipulated period, this Court had called reports of the applicants/ appellants from the District Probation Officer. All the reports have been received, perusal of which shows that all 2 the appellants have undertaken not to indulge in any type of such crime, namely assault on the Government servants or for that matter any other crime. In order that the appellants should realise the consequences of the crime that was committed by them, on 16.7.2009 this Court accepted the statement made by Mr.Mirza that each of the appellant shall deposit Rs.2,000/- in the trial Court. Today Mr.Mirza makes a statement that accordingly the amount has been deposited with the trial Court. Statement accepted. The total amount of fine that has been deposited shall be paid equally to the Government servants who were assaulted, whose names can be found out from the record of the judgment of this Court. The reports placed before me which have been prepared by the District Probation Officer are satisfactory and the conduct of the appellants has been noted to be good, conducive and peaceful. For all these reasons therefore I am inclined to make the following order. Criminal Appln. Nos. 1739/09, 1740/09,1741/09, 1742/09 and 1743/09 are partly allowed. Now the appellants need 3 not undergo the sentence awarded to them vide para 7 of my judgment dated 18.3.2009 and instead they are released on probation, which shall be a period of one year, upon furnishing usual bonds with the trial Court. The District Probation Officer shall keep watch on the appellants for the said period and make report in case anything objectionable is done by them. The amount of fine shall be distributed, as stated in the body of this order. All the criminal applications stand disposed of. JUDGE /TA/ 4