IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION No. 12184 of 2008 Between: Smt.Sriram Prameela W/o.Sundara Rao R/o.Stuartpuram village, Bapatla Mandal, Guntur District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Guntur, Guntur District 2 The Inspector of Police, Bapatla Town Police Station, Guntur District 3 The Station House officer,Bapatla Town Police Station, Bapatla, Guntur District 4 Sri Ramaraju S/o.Not known to the petitioner, Karlapalem Police Station, Bapatla Mandal, Guntur District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Habeas corpus directing the respondents herein to produce the detenue by name sriram Babu, S/o.Sundara Rao, Erukula by caste aged 28 years, R/o.Stuartpuram,Bapatla Mandal, Guntur District and be released from custody. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.GANDURI NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : THE ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : None appeared. The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION No.12184 of 2008 ORAL ORDER : (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice D.S.R.Varma) This Writ of Habeas Corpus is filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondents herein to produce one Sri Sriram Babu, son of Sundara Rao, aged 28 years, resident of Stuartpuram, Bapatla Mandal, Guntur District, who was illegally taken away by the respondent police. 2. When the matter came up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner represented that subsequent to the filing of the writ petition, the alleged detenu was produced before the Court and, therefore, nothing remains for adjudication in this matter. 3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition has become superfluous and the same is liable to be dismissed. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, at the stage of admission. However, there shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA _______________________ JUSTICE K.C.BHANU 25-06-2007 Msr. ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Superintendent of Police, Guntur, Guntur District 2 The Inspector of Police, Bapatla Town Police Station, Guntur District 3 The Station House Officer, Bapatla Town Police Station, Bapatla, Guntur District 4. 2 CCs to the Advocate General, Government of Andhra Pradesh, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. (OUT). 5. 2 CD copies. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION No.12184 of 2008 25-06-2008 (Msr)