IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.506 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:24.01.2011. Varinder Kumar Kochhar ...Petitioner Versus Bimla Duggal ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. G.S.Thind, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 26.11.2010 passed by the learned Rent Controller by which an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 [for short “the Act”] for condonation of delay in filing of the application for leave to defend was dismissed on the ground that the time period cannot be extended. Learned counsel for the petitioner has very fairly submitted that there is a judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in the case of Om Prakash Vs. Ashwani Kumar Bassi, 2010(4) RCR (Civil) 163, in which even delay of one day was not condoned on the ground that the learned Controller had no jurisdiction to condone the delay under Section 5 of the Act in filing of an application for leave to defend/contest. In view thereof, I do not find any error in the order passed by the learned Rent Controller and such, the present revision petition is hereby dismissed. No costs. January 24, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE