1 FARAD CONSTITUTION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR APPEAL AGAINST ORDER NO.95/2006 Atmaram Alias Vijay s/o Santoshrao Deshmukh and another ...Versus... Kothiram s/o Shantoshrao Deshmukh and others -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Shri K.S. Jichkar, Adv. for appellants) (Shri K.B. Ambilwade, Adv. for respdt. No.1) CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 17.08.2007. Heard Counsel for the rival parties. Advocate Shri Jichkar for appellants vehemently argued that the Trial Court erred in rejecting his application for grant of temporary injunction. He submits that during the pendency of the suit, the Trial Court ought to have injuncted the respondent. Advocate Shri Ambilwade for respondent No. 1 submits that the portion of the property purchased by his client alone has already been sold even before filing of the suit and he does not intend to sell any 2 remaining property since it is his source of livelihood. In view of this, the present appeal is disposed of with a direction to the parties to maintain status-quo till decision of the Special Civil Suit No. 845/2005. The Trial Court is directed to decide the suit within a period of one year from today. No order as to costs. JUDGE ssw