HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR PETITIONER Contempt Case (Civil) No. 14 of2010 Prafulla Kesharwani, S/o Shri S.L. Kesharwani, Aged about 51 years, Sub Engineer, P.H.E. Department, Bilaspur (C.G.) RESPONDENT Versus Shri Dinesh Shrivastava, Secretary, P.H.E. Department, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) r (Contemot Case under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Section 12 ofthe Contempt of Courts Act, 1971) Appearance : Mr. Rajnish Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. ORAL ORDER (21.01.2010) SUNILKUMAR SINHA. J. Heard on admission. Petitioner, Prafu!la Kesharwani, has filed this petition for initiation of proceedings of contempt against the respondent for the alleged default committed by the respondent in compliance of order dated 30.3.2007 passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No. 1912/2007. This Court while hearing the said writ petition on 30.3.2007 passed the following order:- "Shri L.P. Dubey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent 1 and2. Heard. Rule-re-notice. Issue notice to the respondents, as per rules. Any promotion, which is the subject matter of this petition, shall besubject to final decision ofthis case. In view of the above, I.A. No. 1, application for grant of ad- interim relief, stands disposed of." /--< F i Contempt Case CCivin No. 14 of 2010 Thus, no order of prohibitory nature was passed by this Court. Mr. Rajnish Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, coujd not point out as to how this order was violated by the respondent. In the facts and circumstances of the case, 1 do not find any reasons to proceed further in this matter for initiation of proceedings of contempt against the respondent. The petition has no merit, the same is liable to be dismissed and is dismissed summarily. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge N*Ai