CR No.6686 of 2008 [1] THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No.6686 of 2008 Date of Decision: 10 - 12 - 2008 Daya Wati and another ....Petitioner v. Kailash Rani and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA *** Present: Mr.Ashok Khubbar, Advocate for the petitioners. *** KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA (ORAL) Case of petitioner No.1 is that her husband Sham Lal Gupta was the tenant. After his death, she along with her daughter Anchla Rani and son Ramesh Chand had inherited the tenancy. Sham Lal Gupta died on 23.1.2003 during the pendency of eviction petition. It has been contended before me that son Ramesh Chand was brought on record as legal heir of Sham Lal Gupta and petitioners Daya Wati and Anchla Rani were not impleaded as legal representatives. Objection petition was filed before the Executing Court. The Executing Court held that son Ramesh Chand had vigorously followed the litigation against the landlord and acted on behalf of the petitioners. The Executing Court after examining the entire record also observed that the interest of the objectors were well looked after by CR No.6686 of 2008 [2] Ramesh Chand. On the last date of hearing file of Civil Revision No.2923 of 2007 filed by son Ramesh Chand was summoned by this Court. That revision petition was dismissed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 8.10.2007. All arguments which were possibly available have been raised by Ramesh Chand. It cannot be said that there was any other argument which was available and the same has not been raised to the detriment of the petitioners. At this stage, counsel for the petitioners state that petitioner No. 1 is 85 years old lady, whereas petitioner No.2 is divorcee dependent upon petitioner No.1. Therefore, he state that he crave and submit himself to the mercy of the Court that sufficient time be granted to the petitioners to make alternative arrangement. Taking into consideration that petitioners are two ladies, widow and divorcee respectively, therefore, six months time is granted to the petitioners to vacate the demised premises. The Executing Court may defer the execution proceedings for six months subject to filing an undertaking on or before 1.1.2009 that petitioners shall hand over vacant possession of the demised premises to the landlady on or before 30.6.2009 subject to depositing the entire arrears of rent, if any, and rent in advance. The present revision petition is disposed off. ( KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA ) December 10, 2008. JUDGE RC