IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No. 386 of 1990 (O&M) Date of decision: 8.3.2011 Union of India .. Appellant v. Vijay Inder Kumar .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Ms. Kamla Malik, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Ashok Gupta, Advocate for the respondent. Rajesh Bindal J. Challenge in the present appeal is to the order dated 15.12.1989, passed by the learned court below accepting the application filed by the respondent for appointment of Arbitrator. On 9.12.2010, learned counsel for the appellant sought adjournment. Even even today, she is not aware of the present status. The appeal was admitted on 16.7.1990 and there is no interim stay. As a consequence of the order passed by the learned court below directing appointment of Arbitrator and also submission of award within the period prescribed in law, during the pendency of appeal before this court, even the Arbitrator may have decided the dispute between the parties and the present appeal may have been rendered infructuous. However, as learned counsel for the appellant is not able to furnish the requisite information, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 8.3.2011 mk