IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN MONDAY, THE 9TH JULY 2007 / 18TH ASHADHA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 1029 of 2007(S) ARISING FROM THE JUDGEMENT IN WP(C) NO.18491/2007 Dated 21/06/2007 PETITIONER: PETITIONER: --------------------------- G. SURENDRAN, S/O.GOVINDAN, AGED 56, G.S.LAND, PRALAYAGIRI,THOCAUD PO, VADASSERIKONAM, VARKALA BY ADV. SRI.R.ANILKUMAR RESPONDENT: 6TH RESPONDENT IN WRIT PETITION. --------------------------------------------- K.R.BIJU,SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VARKALA. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. MEERA THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & K.T.SANKARAN,J. ---------------------------------------------------- Cont. Case (C) NO. 1029 OF 2007 S ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th July, 2007 JUDGMENT H.L.DATTU, C.J. Alleging that the respondent has disobeyed the orders and directions issued by this Court in W.P.(C) No.18491 of 2007 dated 21st June, 2007, petitioner is before us in this contempt petition. 2. Along with the contempt petition except producing the judgment delivered by this Court, the petitioner has not produced any other material, even to suggest that the respondent has disobeyed the orders and directions issued by this Court. Apart from this, if, for any reason, the petitioner's life was in danger, he ought to have approached the respondent by making appropriate complaint. If, for any reason, the Sub Inspector of Police had not taken cognizance of the complaint, then only petitioner can approach this Court for appropriate reliefs. In that view of the matter, we decline to entertain this contempt petition. It is accordingly rejected. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) Chief Justice (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/