IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 17 of 2006 Date of decision: 11.8.2010. Jagdish Ram ….. Petitioner. Vs. Pramod Singh …. Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the Petitioner : Mr. G.D. Verma, Senior Advocate, with Mr. B.C. Verma, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The complaint of the petitioner is that order, dated 17.3.2006, passed by this court has been violated. The order reads as follow:- “During the pendency of the writ petition, respondents shall not interfere in the possession of the petitioner including the land under passage.” In the reply filed by the respondent, it is specifically stated that the respondent has not interfered with the possession of the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid reply, no further action is called for in COPC. It is closed. In case, the petitioner seeks any further clarification pertaining to the interim order, he is at liberty to do so in the pending writ petition. ( Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice ( Kuldip Singh) Judge August 11, 2010 (sks/pankaj)