IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 14147 of 2005 Between: 1 Smt. Samudrala Chandrakala W/o. Ganeswar R/o.2-20, Konda Mallapalli Devarakonda Nalgonda Dist. Vide Refusal Order No.622/2002. 2 Smt. Vanaparthy Padma W/o. Murali R/o.18-165, Gandhinagar Devarakonda Nalgonda Dist. Vide Refusal Order No.623/2002, dt.18-1-2003 3 A. Narasimha S/o. Samaiah R/o.3-2-153, Sathavahananagar L.B.Nagar Hyderabad. 4 K. Vajramma D/o. Papaiah R/o.3-2-153, Sathavahananagar L.B.Nagar Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1. The State of A.P Rep.by its Special Chief Secretary to the Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The District Registrar of Stamps and Registration, R.R.District 3 The Sub Registrar, Champapet R.R.Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not registering and releasing petitioners sale deeds as per G.O.Ms.No.807, Revenue (Registration-I) Department, Dt.13-10-2004 as illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice, discrimination and contrary to G.O.Ms.No.807, dt.13-10-2004 and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to release the sale deeds of the petitioners after due registration of their respective plots by extending the benefit of judgment in W.P.No.12012/2005, dt.09-06-2005 and pass such other order as it may deem fit and just. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.VENKATESWARLU Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE The Court, at the stage of admission, made the following: Oral order:- As agreed by the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue, the present writ petition is covered by the judgment of the learned single Judge of this Court dated 01-03-2005 in W.P.No. 2414 of 2005. The writ petition is accordingly allowed. The 3rd respondent is directed to process the documents presented by the petitioners to him for registration and release the sale deeds of the petitioners after due registration and collecting the normal charges and fees for the said purpose without declining to do so on the basis of the Government orders in G.O.Ms.No. 751 Revenue (Regn.,I) Department dated 12-12-2001. The 3rd respondent, however, shall be at liberty not to register the documents or release the said documents in favour of the petitioners, if there be any other objections to such conduct except objections based on G.O.Ms.No. 751 dated 12-12-2001. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dt. 07-07-2005 Pvks/* To 1. The Special Chief Secretary to the Revenue Department, State of A.P., Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The District Registrar of Stamps and Registration, R.R.District 3 The Sub Registrar, Champapet R.R.Dist. 4 2 CCs., to the learned Government Pleader for Revenue, A.P. High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 5 2 CD copies