IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No.14336 of 2010 Date of decision: 27.8.2010 M/s Industrial Cables (India) Ltd. -----Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab & others. -----Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present:- Mr. K.S. Baghi, Advocate for the petitioner. --- ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. This petition seeks quashing of order dated 2.11.2004, Annexure P-7. 2. By the said order, the Sales Tax Tribunal, Punjab dismissed the appeals of the petitioner against orders of assessment and levy of penalty under the provisions of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948. The petitioner also filed an application for rectification of the said order which was dismissed on 8.11.2005. To explain delay and not availing of remedy of reference available under the Statute, contention raised on behalf of the petitioner is that the petitioner had instructed his counsel to file application for reference but the counsel failed to do so. C.W.P. No.14336 of 2010 3. It is patent that the petitioner moved this Court six years after passing of the impugned order and five years after dismissal of the application for rectification. The petition, thus, suffers from laches and cannot be entertained, at this stage. 4. It is well settled that for invoking jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner should come to the Court at the earliest reasonable opportunity. Reference may be made to judgment of Constitution Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Trilok Chand Moti Chand and others v. H.B. Munishi, Commissioner of Sales Tax, Bombay and another (1969) 1 SCC 110, paras 10, 41 and 65. The principles laid down therein have been reiterated, inter-alia, in Eastern Coalfields Limited v. Dugal Kumar (2008) 14 SCC 295, paras 24 to 29. 5. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE August 27, 2010 ( RAJESH BINDAL ) ashwani JUDGE 2