,‘o $ w Ex; H xii: PETE? )a’ $se§§£imaw /.. V.K.Iain Sfa Kilaiix, aged a’aout §é§ u" yea 33b Engiaeey Ema} Engmewmg Sfgi inas, 31$ Biwsim Batik, B“ 1 ,f‘w Mman . war; g q ‘Lmgw / , r Kgadlm Dis’i: Kawai'dha juExi 6 REG Chhir Earn: Calm); Bndia bx? Kmvardhzg—(CGJ Six-ate Qf {Shhgitisgai'h iEii‘augh ms Sacwm‘y Famhwg fKVam Gmuig Vikas Vibhag: DES Bhawam Raipm; Ms: : Raip1u‘~(C.G,) The DySecrekaIy Panchayai xfwam Gramii: Vikaa Vibhag, DES Bhawan, Rajpui', Digit Raipnr-{CG} 3. R. am' Sub Egginee; Rum} Eagzmen’ng Sai‘viCeS, Jgnfyad Panahayat Baioda Dist : Janj ' ampa-{CGJ ON UNDEE ARTECLE Lg“? mwgiféi g:g§g:§fgfg:gj0N Q3? m'mA i,» £ l a w I " ;x I " If i The challenge 1'11 this v 16/04/2003 (AnneXure P/ 1) working as Sub Engineer, Division Bodla, Dist. Kawardh Dist. Janjgir Champa in the SJ that the petitionsr has bee ‘ submitted that though the mpmscntation (Annexurc P/3) not yet been decided by 1 therewith the petitioner has am Having considered the fa and material on record, in ti justice will serve if a direction detailed representation along / Yompetent authority Within fiftFCn days from today and on such \ [dotted nit petition is to the order dated whereby the petitioner, who was Rural Engineering Services, Sub a, has been nansferred to Baloda, me capacity. it is also submitted transferred illegally It is also petitioner, has submitted his dated 26/04/2003, the same has he respondent. Being aggrieved amached this Court for relief. Lcts and citeumstances of the case Le opinion of dn's Court, ends of is given to the petitioner to make a with a copy of this order to‘the \ XI-HC-zz 3a "3mm, We, WW x \ sneer m mtm Iii 2M3 fma arts Em Wm twat e Eel I‘m A mam met wee sW em 02/05/2003 Shri P. Diwakar counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ranbir Singh, GA f ar the State Heard. XE-HC—22 Wm Whwaftwm mmaizw vL" $Wm representation being filed the C mpetent authority shall decide the same by passing a reasone order in accordance with law within two monthe from the date of production of representation. If any adverse order is passed and the petitioner thereby feels aggrieved, he may n16 the petitj'bn anesh challenging the said order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the ease. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not been relieved and he is still continuing. If that be, so, he shall not be relieved till consideration/decision of the representation. ‘ ’ With the aforesaide observations, this petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.W.P. 1296/2003 and I.A.No. 3927,1200?) for urgent hearing also stand disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. N sdl- 3 7" i Fakhl“ dd‘m e Judg Li \0 M We that