/ 1 / IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1182 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.356 OF 2002 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1183 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.257 OF 2002 Manisha Parshuram Dandekar ...Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondents --- Ms. Manisha Pant i/b. Bhave & Co. for Applicant Shri P.A. Pol APP for the State. ---- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED 8TH DECEMBER, 2008 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant and the Learned APP for the State. 2. This is an application for return of the ornaments described in Exhibit A to the application. 3. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant submits that the Applicant is the Original Complainant and the ornaments in question, were directed to be returned to her during pendency of the trial. Later on during the trial, these ornaments were again produced by the Applicant for the purpose of identification in the Court. The Trial Court also while / 2 / dismissing of the Sessions Case, directed the Registrar to the Sessions Court to return the ornaments to the Applicant after expiry of the appeal period. 4. In the meantime, however, the Respondent-accused has filed this appeal. The Applicant, therefore, has taken out this application for return of the ornaments. 5. It is not disputed that these ornaments, which were robbed by the Respondent were returned to her during the trial. 6. In view of this and in view of the findings recorded by the Sessions Court, the said articles, details which are given in Exhibit A be returned to the Applicant herein. 7. Both the applications are allowed and are disposed of. V.M. KANADE J.