IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.A.ABDUL GAFOOR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.R.UDAYABHANU MONDAY, THE 22ND JANUARY 2007 / 2ND MAGHA 1928 W.P.(C).No. 2403 of 2007(J) ------------------------- RCP.37/2006 of RENT CONTROL COURT, KOLLAM .................... PETITIONER: ------------ 1. MALIK MUHAMMED, S/O.SAYED MUHAMMED, AGED 53 YEARS, PUTHUVEETTIL PURAYIDAM, MANACAD CHERRY, VAKADDEVILA VILALGE. 2. MUHAMMED BASHEER, S/O.SAYED MUHAMMED, AGED 51 YEARS, LIONS COLONY, MUNDAKKAL VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.R.SATISH KUMAR SMT.B.S.SEEMA RESPONDENTS: ------------- ANIL KUMAR, S/O.LATE BHARGAVAN PILLAI, AGED 37 YEARS, KALEELIL THEKKATHIL THEKKEVEEDU, ARUNOOTTIMANGALATHU CHERRY, MANGAD VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY / THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.A. ABDUL GAFOOR & K.R. UDAYABHANU, JJ ============================= W.P.(C). NO. 2403 OF 2007 ============================== Dated this the 22nd day of January 2007 JUDGMENT Abdul Gafoor,J The landlord who has filed RCP No. 37/2006 before the Rent Control Court, Kollam, on 20.11.2006 is seeking a direction to the Rent Controller to dispose of the said petition with a time frame. The statute itself has fixed a time frame. That time was not over. In the circumstances, this writ petition is totally unnecessary. The petitioner need not be apprehensive that the tenant will adopt a dilatory tactics because the court has to proceed in accordance with law. The writ petition is dismissed accordingly. K.A. ABDUL GAFOOR, JUDGE K.R. UDAYABHANU, JUDGE. RV