THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU C.M.A.No.317 of 2009 JUDGMENT: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed questioning the docket order made in I.A.No.3748 of 2008 in O.S.No.2707 of 2008 dated 2.3.2009 on the file of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy district, whereunder the I.A. was disposed of by a docket order dated 2.3.2009, which reads as under: “Counter of R-67 and R-78 not filed, costs not paid, they are caveators in this case. No representation. Hence issue ‘Statusquo’ to R-67 and R-78 until further orders. Await notices and issue fresh notices to other respondents. Call on 28.4.2009”. In spite of service of notices on respondents 1 and 2, neither they have appeared nor there is any representation on their behalf. Even otherwise, the very order passed by the Court below, which is under challenge, does not stand to scrutiny of law. It appears, appellants herein have filed a caveat application and since there was no representation on their behalf, Status quo was granted only against them and in fact, rest of the respondents in I.A.No.3748 of 2008 were not served with notices as on the date of passing order. Under those circumstances, since the impugned docket order was already suspended by this Court as early as on 24.3.2009 and since there is no representation on behalf of respondents, I deem it appropriate to set aside the impugned order. 2 In the result, the CMA is allowed and the impugned order is set aside. The Court below is directed to consider the matter afresh after hearing all the parties concerned. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 17.6.2010 DA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU C.M.A.No.317 of 2009 17.6.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU C.M.A.No.317 of 2009 Date: 17th June, 2010 Between: Narayanadas Kishandas & another. .. Appellants And G.Shankaraiah and others. .. Respondents