BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Thirtieth day of June Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.S.RAMANATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.7982 of 2011 1 SEETHARAMAN 2 PORSELVI 3 VENKATESH ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs. STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KALAKADU POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. CR NO. 159/2011 ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.M.MAHARAJA Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 379 I.P.C., and Section r/w 4(1) (2) r/w 21 of Mines and Minerals Development Act, in Crime No.159 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent and they have not committed any offence and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the first and third petitioners are drivers and the second petitioner is the owner of the vehicle and all of them attempted to transport the sand without any valid permit and the vehicles were seized and the sand was also recovered. 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the vehicles have been seized and the sand also recovered, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 5. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 30/06/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NANGUNERI. 2 -Do-Thro' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KALAKADU POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S.M.MAHARAJA Advocate SR.No.20951 akm/04.07.11 /2p-6c/ ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.7982 of 2011 Date :30/06/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/