IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA MONDAY, THE 23RD JUNE 2008 / 2ND ASHADHA 1930 Bail Appl..No. 4001 of 2008() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.102/2008 OF PERUMPADAPPU POLICE STATION .................... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED:- ------------------------------------- 1. ANEER, S/O BEERANHAJI, THANDAM KOLLIL HOUSE, P.O.PALAPETTY, PONNANI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. ANAS, S/O HAMSAKUTTY, THECHAN PURAKKAL HOUSE, P.O.PALAPETTY, PONNANI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.J.SAJI ISAAC RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT : -------------------------------------------- SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PONNANI, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.K.S.SIVAKUMAR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.HEMA, J. ------------------------------ B.A. No.4001 OF 2008 ------------------------------ Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2008 O R D E R This is an application for anticipatory bail. 2. The alleged offences are under sections 341, 324, 326, 308 read with 34 of IPC. According to the prosecution, the petitioners along with other accused armed with deadly weapons like swords have committed various offences. The petitioners are the 2nd and 4th accused in the crime. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that no allegations are made against the 2nd petitioner in the First Information Statement. Both of them are innocent of the allegations made. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that specific allegations are made against the accused that they were armed with deadly weapons like sword etc. On considering the nature of offence committed, I am not satisfied that it is a fit case to grant anticipatory bail. The application is dismissed. K.HEMA, JUDGE pac