IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45244 of 2009 1. Lilawati Devi, wife of Surendra Chouhan, 2. Surendra Chouhan, son of Dukhi Chouhan, 3. Mahesh Chouhan, son of Dukhi Chouhan. All of village Taradih, PS Madanpur, district Aurangabad – petitioners. vs. The State of Bihar. 2 22.2.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make correction in the bail petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case under sections 498A and 304B of the Penal Code. Petitioner no.1 is in the same position in the family as the deceased. Petitioners 2 and 3 are brother-in-laws who live outside the town where the occurrence is said to have taken place. The marriage took place more than ten years back. Considering this aspect the petitioners are directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender within six weeks, in Madanpur PS Case No. 119/2009 on furnishing bail bonds of rupees ten thousand each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. It is made clear that the petitioners should cooperate with the court in future and appear on each and every date as and when required by the court. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)