Crl. Misc. No.M-30126 of 2010 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Decided on: November 17, 2010. Crl. Misc. No.M-30126 of 2010 (O&M) Pawan .. Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana. . Respondent *** CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI PRESENT Mr.Bijender Dhankar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Gursreet Kaur, DAG., Haryana. Mr.Arun Yadav, Advocate, for the complainant. *** M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) The petitioner seeks the concession of pre-arrest bail in a case registered at the instance of Pohap Singh, complainant, alleging that his daughter-in-law was made to inhale some paper which had some Tantrik effect as a result of which her behaviour changed. . . . 1 Crl. Misc. No.M-30126 of 2010 (O&M) Counsel for the complainant has opposed the petition for pre-arrest bail contending that the petitioner has got an evil eye on the daughter-in-law of the complainant and that he had indulged in the act of teasing and outraging her modesty. A perusal of the FIR indicates that there is no allegation of outraging of modesty. Pursuant to the interim order, the petitioner has already joined investigation. Taking into consideration the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner and absence of any allegation of outraging the modesty, the interim order dated 11.10.2010, is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions that the petitioner will join the investigation as and when required by the police and that he will not tamper with the evidence or hamper the investigation, in any manner. It is made clear that the petitioner will also not commit the similar offence of which he is accused of during the pendency of trial. In case of any such eventuality, it will be open to the prosecution agency to seek cancellation of the bail. Disposed of. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE November 17, 2010. rka . . . 2