-1- R.P. No. 154 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 154 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6049 OF 2002 Sau. Anjani Sanjay Mane ... Petitioner vs. Lokmanya Indane Ashta and others ...Respondents Shri Shrishail Sakhare for the petitioner. Mr. A.B. Vagyani for respondent No.1. Mr. J. Mistry, instructed by M/s. RMG Law Associates for respondent Nos. 3 and 4. Mr. Y.R. Mishra with Mr. D.A. Dubey for respondent No.5. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & R.M. SAVANT, JJ. DATE: AUGUST 09, 2010. P.C. The above writ petition was disposed of by our judgment and order dated 29th June, 2010. The above review petition has been filed by the original petitioner in the Writ Petition taking exception to the directions we have issued in paragraph 11 of the said judgment. The said directions entail the concerned authority to take its own decision including a decision to continue the distributorship of L.P.G. with respondent No.1 herein or decision to invite fresh applications for the said distributorship. The learned counsel for the review petitioner herein and the learned counsel for the respondent No.1 had, on the -2- R.P. No. 154 of 2010 instructions of their respective clients, acceded to the said course of action being followed as recorded in the said paragraph 11 of our judgment. In our view, in the light of the observations made in the said paragraph 11 of our judgment, the above review petition filed for the reliefs claimed is thoroughly misconceived and is an abuse of the process of law. The review petition is accordingly dismissed. The review petitioner to pay cost of Rs. 5,000/­ each to respondent Nos. 3 and 4 in one set, as well as respondent No.5­Union of India within a period of two weeks from date. If such costs are not paid within the time stipulated by this order, the Collector, Sangli is directed to recover the same as per the procedure prescribed in the Land Revenue Code. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. R.M. SAVANT, J.