THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.15225 of 2010 Date: 30.6.2010 Between: M/s.Sri Lkshminaryana Modern Rice Mill, Narasannapeta (V & M), Jammu Road, Srikakulam District, A partnership Firm, rep by its Managing Partner, S. Eswaramma. ………...Petitioner. And The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Operations, EPDCL of A.P Limited, Narassannapeta, Srikakulam District and another. …… Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.15225 of 2010 ORDER: This writ petition has been filed by M/s.Sri Lkshminaryana Modern Rice Mill seeking a Mandamus declaring a demand notice and also a notice for disconnection of electricity for its Service Connection No.2347, Category-IIIA, Jammu Road, Narasannapeta (V&M), vide letter No.ADE/O/NPT/F.Dkt.No.16/10-11, D.No.383/10, dated 17.5.2010 as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner engaged in the business of running rice mill. The petitioner secured Service Connection bearing No.2347 falling under Category-IIIA. The Divisional Engineer, Srikakulam visited the premises of the petitioner on 7.4.2010 and found that the petitioner exceeded the contracted load. Thereupon, the Assistant Divisional Engineer, Operation, Narassnnapet issued notice dated 17.5.2010 demanding the petitioner to regularize the additional load by paying the following charges: “Service Line Charges :: Will be intimated separately, if any. Development Charges :: 30x1500=Rs.45000/-(DEE/O/Tekkali, APEPDCL) Security Deposit :: 30x500=Rs.15000/- (AAO/ERO/Tekkali) APEPDCL) Add. Supervision Charges:: Rs.150/-(DEE/O/Tekkali, APEPDCL)” Assailing the demand notice, this writ petition has been filed. When the writ petition came up for admission, Sri O.Manohar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for A.P.Transco takes notice on behalf of the respondents. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. At the hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the issue raised in this writ petition is squarely covered by final order dated 08.06.2009 in W.P.No.1037 of 2009 and batch and the same is not disputed by the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. In view of the same, this writ petition is allowed with a direction that the reasons and directions contained in final order dated 08.6.2009 in W.P.No.1037 of 2009 and batch shall from part of this order. No costs. ______________________________________ JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY Date:30.6.2010 Note: Furnish CC within three days. B/O mrb