IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 21097 of 1994 Between: V.Satyanarayana Reddy, S/o. Sanjeevappa, R/o. Ananthapur. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Kalyandurg , Ananthapur Dist. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dharmavaram, Ananthapur Dist. 3 V. Govinda Reddy, S/o. Sanjeevapa, R/o. Kallakal (V), Toopram (M), Medak Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to call for the records relating to the proceedings R.C. (G)/958/94 dt.21.10.1994 issued a Writ of Certiorari, or any other appropriate Writ order or direction. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.V.RAMANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No1 and 2 : G.P. for Revenue Counsel for the Respondent No.3: Mr. SURYANARAYANA The Court Made the Following O R D E R: Admittedly there is a civil suit pending between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent herein, who are none other than the brothers. That in respect of the same land, which is the subject matter of the civil suit, the 3rd respondent herein, approached the 2nd respondent for incorporating his name in the revenue records and the 2nd respondent having considered the application of the 3rd respondent, directed the Mandal Revenue Officer, Kalyandurg, Ananthapur District, to make an enquiry and accordingly change the entries in the revenue records. The petitioner had chosen to file the present Writ Petition challenging the proceedings of the 2nd respondent in issuing such directions. That in view of the pendency of civil dispute between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent herein, no such directions could have been issued by the 2nd respondent, directing the 1st respondent herein, to consider the application of the 3rd respondent for making changes and modifications of entries in the revenue records. Such a change, if any, made in the revenue records during the pendency of the civil suit may have its own consequences, which may adversely affect the merits of adjudication of the civil suit. In the circumstances, the Writ Petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner as well as the 3rd respondent to seek appropriate relief with regard to change of entries in the revenue records after the disposal of the civil suit. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. __________________________ B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, J 01-07-2004. MJL/* ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Kalyandurg , Ananthapur Dist. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dharmavaram, Ananthapur Dist. 3 V. Govinda Reddy, S/o. Sanjeevapa, R/o. Kallakal (V), Toopram (M), Medak Dist. 4. 2 CCs to G.P. for Revenue 5. 2 CD copies.