HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH. BItASPUR W.P.fSl Wo. 6000 of 2007 PETITIOBBR Lalit Kumar Sahu, aged 49 years, son of late Uttani Singh Sahu, Vyayain (P.T.)Sikchhak, Mahatma Gandhi High School, Durg. Vetsws RE8PONDENT8 1. Mmiicipal C^rporation, Durg, through the Coimnissioner, Mumcipal Corporation, Dui^ 8. The State Goverrtment of Chhattisgarh, fhrough the Sccretary, School Educatwn Departiacnt, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G) WRITPETmON UNDBR ARTICLE 3%6 OF THE CONSTITOIOM OFINDIA ABpearaace: Shri N.L. Shrivastava, cminsel for the petitioner. Ku. Sunita Jain, Panel lAwyer appears for the State/ Respondent No.2 on advance copy. None for respondent no. "l. OR&L ORDER (15.10.2007) SXJNIL KUMAR 8INHA. J. Heaid. Thc petitioner who is working on fhe post of Vyayain Shiksbak has prayed for payinent of two advance increinents on the ground that he bas passed B.P.Ed., examination on his own expenses and hc would t>e benefited by ttic Circular dated 24.12.1998 iss^ied by the erstwhfle State ofMadhya Pradesh. Leamed counsel for fhe petitioner ai^iies that in the matter ofB.Ed., D.Ed., & B.T.l., etc., benefit oftwo advance increinents have been extended to the employees, but siich benefit is not heing extended to the petitioncr. For the time being he prays for disposal of fhis petitioo wifh tiberty to the petitioner to inake a reprRsentation bcfore the. conccmed authority, wifh a further direction to the said authority to dispose of the said W.P. (S) No.6000 of2007 -J^ representation in accordance wjth thc contents of tlie circular dated 24.12.1998 and also in accordancc with the other rules etc., in this regard. The aforessaid limited prayer of fhe leamed counsel for tlie petitioner is not opposed by the leamed State Counsel. The saine is allowed. It is directed fhat the petitioner, if so advised, inay fite a detailed representation before the conccmed authority along-with a copy of this order aad a copy of the writ petition as also fhe Circular dated 24.12.1998 within a period of 3 wecks feom today and if such a representation is filed that sball he disposed of by the concemal authorily at the earliest, in acconlance with law. This pctition stands finally disposed off wifh ffi^e aforesaid observation/direction. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge /Raa/