AB 88/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE K.MERUNO Heard Mr. B.K.Mahajan, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. B. S.Sinha, learned Addl.P.P, for the State. The petitioners namely, 1.Sri Dharani Boro, 2.Sri Parameswar Boro.3. Sri Lohit B oro and 4. Sri Dipak Rai being apprehending arrest in connection with C.I.D. P. S. Case No. 58 of 2010 under Section 120(B)/379 /407 /411 /285 IPC read with Sec tion 7 of Essential Commodities Act have filed this pre-arrest bail application. The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner No. 1 is the owner of the land and petitioners No. 2,3 and 4 are his labourers. The allegat ions made in the FIR is that the patrolling products (oil) being pilferaged by one Sri Nripen Rava and others for which the FIR has been lodged and police inve stigated the case. The learned Addl.P.P. has produced the Case Diary and it revels from the Case Di ary that the petitioner No. 1 is the land owner which was rented to the said Nr ipen Rava, the accused, who has been named in the FiR while the other petitioner Nos. 2,3 and 4 have nothing to do with the alleged offence. On perusal of the Case diary there appears no prima facie involvement of the acc used -petitioners in the present FIR. In view of the above, the petitioners No. 1 to 4. are entitled to be granted the privilege of pre arrest bail . Consequently, it is provided that the petitioners 1.Sri Dharani Boro, 2.Sri Par ameswar Boro.3. Sri Lohit Boro and 4. Sri Dipak Rai, in their event of their arr est, they shall be released on bail on furnishing a Bail Bon of Rs. 10,000/- eac h with one local surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arres ting authority on conditions that they shall make themselves available to the I. O. as and when required and that they shall co-operate with the investigation. With the above directions, this bail petitions stands allowed and disposed of.