IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION 1st Bail Application No. 1018 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Vinay Saroha .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party ___________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No. 227/2010, U/s 304-B IPC, PS Kotwali Gangnahar, Roorkee, District Haridwar. ___________________________________________________________________ November 26, 2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. Manish Arora, the learned Counsel for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, the learned Addl. GA for the State. Perusal of the FIR indicates that no specific role has been assigned to the applicant and the co-accused has already been granted bail either by this Court or by the court below. Consequently, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled for bail at this stage. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Vinay Saroha be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 227/2010 under Section 304-B IPC, PS Kotwali Gangnahar, Roorkee, District Haridwar subject to his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of JM, Roorkee. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) 26.11.2010 PRABODH