LM p^ if^/o^" BEFOffi: THE n.P.STSTC AOniNISTfiSnvE TfiIBUNAL AT .lABALPUR B.A.NO.''2'/-^ \ /199S /' . • ' • " • Balloo singb Tbakur s/o Nohar si.nsh Tt'akur aged 23 yrs» Cb@ukidar( Latour) B/0 Exscutive ERginesr,yater Besources £}epart;Bant» Kauardfaa Division«Kauardtaa,Distt- Rajaandgaon»H/a Bajnabal Cbeuk> Ktieragarfa OiuisioB.Distfc-Rajnandgaan V e r s u s •ApplieaBt 1.5tate af Badhya pradesh through- Tt»B sacr8tary,uater Resoarcas Qeptt., Uallabb Bhauan» 2«Chief EBgj.RaeFtHahanadi G@adaii)ari> Kacbhar yater fjeaources BspartBent, Ralpur. S.sypsrintending £ng.i.neeri Uater fiesources £iepartBeRt.» ShivBato nandal»Byrg« 4«£xecuti.ueEn^iB8ar,yat9r Resources BepartaefitiKauardha Biwistofi» Ksuardha»Oistt-RajBaRdgean» —RespoRoeRts fiPPLICATiON UBDER SECUON 19 OF TOE BOfiINI3THATiy£ TRIBUNAL ACT»19S5 i"'iTl lilll 1 • Parti cylar3 g f _the_ apolicants 2»particulars of tbs rBsp0_BdatttSt As ato we« As above 3«particular3 of ths order against ubicfei tba application is fliailB; i)Against tha order dt. 4.B.1995 -2- A^ s.l-.w' •.'U^A)UP3 :»rttaadMnUf,nfr!BWiuStuui^^^£T .••I'-l, /^s* '75? ^||A,!r!4<. -®Tll-4<P?. --K-W-i< ^...^.^X).J/.g o/.&^ 20, (^ il! <?sn an^r amrai' TOnWTH?F°?35W "^T?|^y?^ 'i-I 'HT-TT'T5''2T ^ 3fn 'iWI •riti Shri Ashi'sh Shrivastava counjsel for the petltioner. Shri Arv'ind Dubey PL for the j'espondents/State. Case of the petitloner is that he was appointed as Chow-kidar in February 1989 and continued cjn fhe said post tii! i'ssuance of termination oro'er dated 4.8.19^5 ana' thereafter the other itil 31.1.2 Counsei for fhe pefitioner s^bmits that the firsf termination jorder dated 4.8.1995 was stayed b^ this Court on 5.9.1995 and on jthe strength of the said stay orderj the petltioner contlnued on the jsaid pos{ till passing of fhe s^cond termination order dated J31.1.2000 which was ateo stayed la^er on by order dated 16.2.2000. jCounsel for the petitioner further|submits that on 5.3.2008 the jGsvernment has issued a circular 4nd taken a decision to consider jthe cases of the persons who were &ppojnted prior to year 1998 and jatso of those vvho are working for last 10 years. in view of the subsequent deyeiopments an.d issuance of the jcircular dated 5.3.2008, at this stsge counsel for the petitioner jsubmsts that he may be permi'tted to withdraw this petitjon with iiberty to make a representation jto the concerned respondents jseekjng regularization of service. He aiso prays for a direction to the rts to considerthe case of the petitioner in the •; ;^:-i';''~;"'<'T-ii:-'F:?ITT^—;-'S.'95-—11 /.'OyS"—1.00.0i'i'. -3~5ST -^il'-i!"l'4. '©TfP-PT'3. T'-^-1H4' -2. ^ 200 ^T-q^-C ra) 3I^(Wf?WI; aii^rsiiiRi- <' ^- ^OWR'IflfiT 31'CT light of the iegal position and -^,i.f-ili\J T!V^~^ fS' ^gnwisiTO, various circulars issued by the Government. He submits thaf sortie time iimit may aiso be fixed for deciding the representation of th^ petitioner. To this prayer of the counse! for the pefi'tioner, counse objection, ingly, the petiti !iberty as aforesaid. ff the peti{iorj( concerned respondents within on4 month from the date of receipt of j copy of this order, fhe concern^d respondents are expected to decide the same within a further for the respondents/State has n< !S disrnissed as withdrawn vvith ier makes a representation tc the period of three months from the date of its receipt strictiy In accord^nce with law. Thi's Court has not express^d any opinion on the merits of the case and the authorities con4erned are free to decide fhe representation of the petitioner stn'ctiy in accordance with law taking jnto consideration the circulars and the gujdelines !n respect of regui'arization of government empl^syees. — Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar .. Judge ': 0^1 :^:T ;T3^T^^T^—^S/95—-! 1 ^W^-—\ ,W.Qi^.