THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU W.A.NO.667 of 2009 06-10-2010 BETWEEN; Ambika Prashad and others ...Appellants vs. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary and others ...Respondents THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU W.A.NO.667 of 2009 ORAL ORDER: (Per GR,J) The writ appeal is directed against the judgment dated 27.02.2009 of th learned single judge rejecting Writ Petition No.23716 of 2007 instituted by th appellants herein challenging the Memo dated 22-09-2007 of the Joint Collecto Ranga Reddy District, rejecting the petitioners’ claim for regularisation of the possession of an extent of Ac.1.02 guntas in Sy.No.278 of Malkajgiri Village an Mandal, Ranga Reddy District under a Government’s policy set out i G.O.Ms.No.515, dated 19-04-2003, as revised in G.O.Ms.No.1601 dated 29-08 2005. By the memo impugned in the writ petition, the appellants’ claim fo regularisation of their possession was rejected on the ground that th Government policy is meant only for dwelling structures that are existing prior t 1990 but not for vacant Government lands under encroachment and that th applicants/appellants failed to satisfy the conditions in G.O.Ms.Nos.515 and 160 dated 19-04-2003 and 29-08-2005 respectively. The learned single judge rejected the writ petition. Earlier the Tahasilda had initiated action under the Land Encroachment Act,1905 and passed orders o eviction which had been confirmed in an appeal and revision and had becom final. The panchanama dated 14-04-1999 had recorded dispossession of th appellants. As the appellants were lawfully dispossessed and failed to establis existence of any dwelling units prior to relevant date specified in G.O.Ms.No.515 the rejection of their applications for regularisation of their possession by th Memo of the Joint Collector dated 22-09-2007 was held by the learned sing Judge to be impeccable and not liable to be interfered with. We see no reason t interfere with the said decision as it suffers from no error, warranting appellat interference. The learned counsel for the appellants would submit in oral argument tha the Government had issued a fresh policy vide G.O.Ms.No.166, Revenu (Assn.Pot) Department, dated 16.02.2008, called -- The Andhra Prades Transfer of Rights to certain specified categories of occupants of unassigne Government lands policy, 2008 and that the appellants have submitted a application on 12-05-2008 for regularisation of their possession and grant of tit to the property in question, in terms of the aforesaid policy. In view of the submission above, while dismissing the Writ Appeal, w preserve the liberty of the appellants to pursue their applications, by appropriat representations for expeditious disposal of their applications for benefits unde G.O.Ms.No.166 dated 16-02-2008. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ GODA RAGHURAM,J ___________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU,J 6th OCTOBER 2010. TSNR