ra7.11 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 7 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 10739 OF 2010 Sayyed Sabbirbhai Abbasbhai & another .. APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. P.S. Pawar, advocate for the applicants. Mr. D.R. Kale, AGP for the State. ===== CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE & R.M. BORDE, JJ. DATE : 20 th JANUARY, 2011 PER COURT : 1 Applicants are seeking review of the order passed in the Writ Petition on 7th December, 2010. The order reads thus :- 1 The petitioners pray for an enquiry into the grant of certificates to the respondent Nos. 6 to 8 of belonging to Chapparband Caste, which is recognized as a Vimukta Jati. 2 On being queried, it it stated that the petitioners do not belong to the said community but ra7.11 2 they belong to Takari Caste, which is recognized as OBC. 3 We, therefore, find no locus in the petitioners to raise the grievance raised in the petition. The petition is, therefore, dismissed on the ground of locus-standi of the petitioners. 2 In paragraph no. 2 of the order, it is observed that the petitioner belongs to 'Takari' caste which is recognized as OBC. The petitioner has, however, placed on record the notification dated 25th May, 2006 issued by the State Government, alongwith list of all backward classes in the State of Maharashtra. The notification and the list show that the caste 'Takari' is recognized as 'Vimukta Jati'. This factual position has not been disputed by the learned AGP. 3 In view thereof, this review application is allowed and the order dated 7th December, 2010 is set aside. The writ petition accordingly stands restored to file. ( R. M. BORDE ) ( D.B. BHOSALE ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb ra7.11 3 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.__________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 10739 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar/s orders | and Registrar’s orders | Mr. P.S. Pawar, adv. for the petitioners. Mr. D.R. Kale, AGP for the State. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE & R.M. BORDE, JJ. DATE : 20 th JANUARY, 2011. 1 By consent of learned counsel for the parties, the petition is taken up for hearing. 2 Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned authorities, if circumstances so demand. Writ petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed for. ( R.M. BORDE) ( D.B. BHOSALE ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb