Criminal Appeal No.2 OF 1994 (U/S.) [Appeal against the judgment and order dated 30.8.1993/1.9.1993 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Bhabhua in Complaint case No.351 of 1990 Trial No.239 of 1993] MURAHU SAO SON OF LATE MEWA SAO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MADURANA, P.S. CHAINPUR, DISTRICT BHABHUA …….. Appellant Versus 1. INDRADEO PRASAD 2. BAIJNATH PRASAD 3. RAJ NATH PRASAD 4. RAM BACHAN PRASAD 5. MADAN PRASAD, ALL SONS OF KEDAR PRASAD 6. JIUT PRASAD SON OF BAIJU SINGH, ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE MADHURANA, P.S. CHAINPUR, DISTRICT BHABUA 7. SHEO MURAT BIND SON OF RAMPATI BIND, RESIDENT OF VILALGE SARANGPUR, P.S. BHABHUA, DISTRICT BHABHUA ……………….. RESPONDENTS For the Appellant : Mr. Ashwani Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, Advocate --------- P R E S E N T THE HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH Anjana Prakash, J: The appellant is aggrieved with the judgment dated 30.8.1993/1.9.1993 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Bhabhua in Complaint case No.351 of 1990 Trial No.239 of 1993, by which it has acquitted the respondent nos.1 to 7. On going through the judgment of acquittal, I find that the same is completely cogent and there is no scope for disagreeing with the reasoning enumerated by the Trial Court. In view of such, the appeal is dismissed. Patna High Court Dated, 5th April, 2011. NAFR/ Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )