IN THE HIGH CORUT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.825 OF 2000 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.919 OF 2000 Gangsingh @ Vijay Harishing Rathod Appellant versus State of Maharashtra Respondent Nitin Jamdar with Vijay Killedar, adv. for Accused no.2. A.M.Shringarpure, AGP for State. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 17th August 2004. PC : 1. For reasons separately recorded, both the appeals are allowed. The conviction of all the accused i.e. accused nos.1 and 2 u/ss.29 r/w Sec.21 and 8(c) of NDPS Act, 1985 and the sentence imposed are set aside. They are in custody. They shall be released forthwith, if not required in any other case. If the accused have paid any fine, the same shall be returned to them. Rest of the order about disposal of the Muddemal property shall remain the same. (D.G.DESHPANDE, J.)