IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 1075 of 2009 Date of decision : April 28, 2009 Subhash Chand Sharma and another Petitioners Versus Land Acquisition Officer and another Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present: Mr. Naresh Prabhakar, Advocate for the petitioners A.N. JINDAL, J. (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 17.10.2008 passed by Additional District Judge, Gurdaspur, dismissing the execution application with the observations that the petitioner has already received a sum of Rs. 70,771/- in excess. This order reveals that the award is dated 13.8.1989. First application filed by the petitioner was dismissed as partly satisfied. Thereafter, two other applications have been filed, second application filed by the petitioner was dismissed on 16.3.2001. The claim set up in the case is with regard to 10% premium on the price of fruit bearing trees alongwith interest for 1 ½ months on the whole amount already paid to the petitioners. The award reveals that Court did not pass any order with regard to awarding of the premium at the rate of 10% on the fruit bearing trees rather the award passed by the Court in this regard is vague. No specific amount has been mentioned which could be given on account of fruit trees. The order apparently C.R. No. 1075 of 2009 2 reveals that Court after due application of mind examined the calculations submitted by the petitioner and the payments received by him, passed the order dated 17.10.2008. Hence, there are no grounds to interfere. Dismissed. (A.N.JINDAL) 28.04.2009 JUDGE reena