IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-30605 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: September 27, 2011 Kharak Singh Bajwa …..Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr.Gurcharan Dass, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Shilesh Gupta, DAG, Punjab Mr.Vikas Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2 .. RAJAN GUPTA, J.: (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this petition a compromise was effected between the parties. A separate petition (Crl.Misc.No.M-28360 of 2010) has been filed seeking quashing of FIR on the basis of same. Aforesaid is not disputed by learned counsel for respondent No.2. Learned State counsel submits that in view of the fact that a separate petition has been preferred by parties seeking quashing of FIR, no cause of action survives in the instant petition. Same is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. September 27, 2011 ( RAJAN GUPTA ) pc JUDGE