r ‘rvmm‘ IN I THE HON’‘ ’ ““N rm?» fi-omymmWax-AM—N‘V~"‘j ‘ HIGHS' ‘ URET ‘ W‘W OF ATTISGA _ W ,V , _ _, " é ' ' AT BILASPUR ' ’ b gt M V »‘->-wr.P‘. (C)-No; gm 0f 2010“} ‘ ‘ ETITI‘ON ShrirTejraJn Dewangan, ,aged 'K ..... M about 51 ears, son of late ‘ Shri Heei'asingh Dewangan, Pujari. and Sarvarakar Ma MaHamaya ; Devi . Mandir Kumhari, R/ o. Patelpara, - Durga Chqwk, Ward No.1, House,No.i§, Kumhari Tahsil Dhamdha ‘ District Durg (Chhattisgarh) $a‘ a WM mMxVmmm V, -'Versus I RE‘spon I ! z . Ems ‘ ‘ “/31) ‘Shri written Raj correct Sahu name (wrorigly is Raju : i Sahu) son ,of Shri Babulal i Sahu, R/ o. Shantinagar, Kumhari, Tahsil Dhamdha, i District Durg (C.G.) Sub DiVisionalv-v;;oi°ficer (R) i Durg-Cum—Registrar, Public ‘ Trust w G.E. Road, Durg (Chhattisgarh) Inspector, Police Station, ‘ Kumhari, Tahsil Kumhari, District Durg (Chhattisgarh ) ' I, :3) Town WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CON\ STITUTION OF INDIA i B E HHR g PER r ;_ V ...... a ,. g: V 5 \ ye 1 ‘\ IGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARILI AT BILASPU 3 - ‘ 7 ' ‘ t ‘ WRIT PETITION (C! NO. 3174 OF 2010 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB Hon’ble Mr Satlsh K Agnlhotrl, J) resent - Shn H BAgrawaI Sr Advocate wrth Ms Pragya Slngh Advocate for the petrtroner I ‘ Shrr Kshmz Sharma Advocate for the respondent No1 ORDER (ORAL! (Passed on 13 day of September, 2010) a. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submrts that the petitioner i may be permitted to wrthdraw this petition wrth liberty to take recourse to alternative statutory forum that may be avarlable under the I provrsmns of Iaw I We. Learned counset further submrts that status quo In respect of the K property m dlspute Involved In W P (C) No 2474/ 2010 was granted . whrch was directed to be continued on 27 08 2010 Smce the property rn dispute rs one and the same the same may be contrnued In thrs case also ' ‘ ‘ Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No 1 submlts that since ’ no Interim order was passed earlier In the Instant case no Interim order may be passed today Hawng regard to the facts srtuatlon the writ petition Is dismissed as - ~, wrthdrawn However If the order granted In W P (C) No 2414/2010 has any beanng In this petition the same may be continued In this petition also ,I Sd/— . Satish K. Agnihotrl l Judge \ ,,_, A , _,;'_.A.J H R 1 P Petitionérj L V Shri Tejram Dewanga'n Versus Resgod¢€nt§ L ‘ Shri Raj Sahu (wrongly written g ‘ ' correct name rs Raju Sahu) & Others