1N THE HIGH COURI‘ OF CHHA’IVI‘ISGARH : BlLASPUlj Writ Petition No. 6262 Of2005 WRIT PI‘I'I‘ION UNDER ARI‘ICLE 226 OF ’I‘HE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shn' Anupam Dubcy, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y. S. ’I‘hakur, Deputy Advocate General with Ms Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the respondents. O R L) E R (Passed on this 4m day of March, 2009) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the penuoner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest the matter on merits, at this stage and he prays for Withdrawal of this petition. However, the petitioner may be granted liberty to make a representation before the competent authority to consider and decide his representation in the light of the judgment and order dated 22.3.1997 passed by the Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Jabaipur in Malikmm Sidar and others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others (Original Application No. 624/ 1997). Learned counsel further submits that the Writ Petition (S) No. 1588 of 2005 (Murii Prasad Kashyap and others Vs. State of M.P. and others) was disposed “\‘XW of by this Court by order dated 7&1 September, 2006, granting i‘\*\ Petitioner Sum‘l Kumar Chansoria, son of Shri Rajendra Shanna, Ex Teacher, Dhariwal Ka Bada, Sharda Chowk, Rapur (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhatrisgarh, thmugh Sccmtaxy, School Education Department, Manhalaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Director, public Instructions, Pension Bada, Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer, Pension Bada, Raipur (C.G.) the same hberty to the peutloners therem av 1s sought ior by the petmoner, hexem tins petmon Laarned Deputy Advocate General appearing for the r’spondents/mate strongly opposes the above submJssmn made bv learned counsel appeanng for the petltloner I fall to understand on what basis leaned Deputy Advooate General opposes the prayer that the petitioner may not be permitted to make a representation in the Iight of certain decision. I don’t think that the State or its representative law onicer can oppose when the petitioner Wish to get beneflt of certam orders winch have been passed by thls (,ouxt In mew of the above the petmon 1s dlsnussed as Wlthdrawn w1th the above stated hbexty, sought for by the petitioner. e. Sd/' $ . sau'sh K. Agnihom Thakur Judge