1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1863 OF 2010 Shri Ramchandra D. Jagdale ...Petitioner v/s The Superintending Engineer, Pune and others ...Respondents Mr N.V. Bandiwadekar for Petitioner. Mr S.R. Nargolkar, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND A.R. JOSHI JJ. DATE : 9TH MARCH 2010. 2 P.C. :- 1] The respondent No.4 was transferred from one office in the same city viz. Pune to another office. The petitioner was transferred in his place. That order was cancelled at the instance of the petitioner. That cancellation was challenged before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. The MAT held that as the transfer order has already been implemented, cancellation is not proper, the procedure under the Maharashtra Regulation of Transfer Act 2005 should have been followed. In our opinion, it is not necessary for us to enter the controversy whether the transfer order was implemented or not. The petitioner and respondent No.4 were being transferred in two offices in the same city. In our opinion, therefore, this is not a matter which should be entertained in its extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court. Petition is rejected. Parties to act on the copy of this order 3 duly authenticated by the Sheristedar / Private Secretary of this Court. Certified copy expedited. ( JUSTICE D.K. DESHMUKH ) ( JUSTICE A.R. JOSHI )