WP(C) 4932/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY The petitioner challenges the appointment of respondent No. 6 Musstt. Shahina Bi lkis as an Anganwadi worker in No. 134 Beltola Anganwadi Center under Karunabari ICDS Project of Lakhimpur District on the ground that the said respondent is no t a local resident within the jurisdiction of the concerned Anganwadi Center. Th e petitioner also claims a better qualified candidate than respondent No.6. Ms. P. Chakraborty, learned standing counsel for the Social Welfare Department s ubmits that the grievances of the petitioner may be directed to be examined by t he Director of Social Welfare, Assam for appropriate decision on the grievances raised by the petitioner. The petitioner has no objection to consideration of the matter by the Director ( respondent No.2). In view of the above agreement, the Director of Social Welfare is directed to ex amine the grievances raised against appointment of respondent No. 6 Musstt. Shah ina Bilkis as an Anganwadi worker in No. 134 Beltola Anganwadi Center. An approp riate decision may thereafter be taken by affording an opportunity to the respon dent No.6. The necessary exercise in this regard be completed within 2 months f rom the date of receipt of a copy of this Court’s order. The petitioner is permitted to furnish a copy of this Court’s order and the writ petition to enable the Director of Social Welfare to comply with the Court’s di rections. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.