.fff s ^'^^^. ^ ^':.. ..^;:^N@; ^ \A v<'^€y"" i'i HI6H COURT OF CHHATTESSARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (5} No. 5000 of 2007 Petitioner Professor l&mleshuior Prosad Dwivedi, 5/0 Lcte 5hri M.N.&wivedi, aged about 66 yeors, Retired Professor, tesidenT of Jacob Chaw! Colony. Link Road, Bilaq}ur. Versus Respondents 1. The State of Chhatt-isgarh. through the Secretary, Ministry of Higher Education, Secre+ariat &|< Bhawun, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Commissioner, Higher Education Department, Sovemment Science Coll^e campus, ftaipur- (C.6.) 3. C.M.Oubey 5hikdia 5amiti (Registefed) through •the Chairman, C.M- Dubey Post 6nMluote, College, Link Road, Baiaspur (C.6.) 4. TTie C.M.D. Post Sruduate Cotlege through its Soveming body &. Ex- officio 5ecrelx»ry/Principal, C.M. bubey Coltege, Biluspur (C.6.) WRFT pETrroiN UNE)ER; ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTnVTIQN OF IN&IA Singte Bench ; Mon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihtrtri. J. 5hri U. N. Affasthy, Senior Advocate with Siri M. K. 5inha, AdvocaTe for the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocctte Seneral for Ihe respondents No. 1 ond 2. ORAL OR&ER (Passsd sr, this 30th dsay of April, 2008) 1. This motier pertuins to i^tiral dues- This Court in the matter of Writ Petition No. 4642/2004 (Saijnath Atendal Vs. The 5-tnte of Chhatti^arh A o'ftiers) and other connected inattars, decided on 31.1.2008. directed the ("ommittee to consider the mat+er of retrial dues as the disputed queation of facts uiere involved. The Commiti'ee was constituted by the State Sovemment, pursuont to 2. 3 •I- Thckur the order dated 19.6.2006 passed in W.P.No. 1961/2006 (Smt. feja Boi Chondrakar Vs. State fiovamment ond o+hers) and ordar dated 13.3.2008 possed in M-C-C. No. 10S/20(»(S-tate of Chhattisgorh ond other-3 Vs. Baijnath Mandal ond onother). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31 of January, 2008 passed in W-P. No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of ChhcrM-isigorh & o-thers) and other connected mntter's, as subini+ted by teamed counsel appearing for the port'ies. With the consent of -the por-ties, this petition is accordingSy diqiosed of in the same terms i.e. the office of the Advocate Seneral is directed to send +he cnsa to the Committee. wi'thin a period of 15 doys frorn the date of receipt of o copy pf this order. ThereoftBr, the Committee shall isfije notice to the petitioner nnd the officers concemed, within a further period of 15 days. The Comniittee shall consider and pass order, in occordance wi+h bw, aftar offording proper opportunity of heoring to the petitioner. The petitioner wid the officer concerned moy file additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, includino payment of retrial dues, if ony. to the petitioner be compieted within a period of four mon-ths from •the dateof receipt of d copy of •rtiis order. The petitioner shalt supply extro copy of the petition to leamed counse! appearing for the pespondents, for- onuurd trunsniission to the said committee. §^/. Satish K. Agnihotn Judge