... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.953 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.953 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.953 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri Hasanali Moomen for the Applicant. Shri A.S.Shitole, A.P.P. for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : SEPTEMBER 22, 2006. : SEPTEMBER 22, 2006. : SEPTEMBER 22, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate appearing for the Applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The conviction of the applicant is under section 304(Part I) of the Indian Penal Code. Substantive sentence is of ten years. After having heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and after perusing the impugned Judgment and Order, I find that no case is made out for enlarging the Applicant on bail. The offence is of very serious nature. Considering the gravity of the case, prayer for bail is rejected. Hearing of the Appeal is expedited. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE