IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11626 of 2010 SHAMBHU PRASAD CHAURASIYA @ SHAMBHU CHAURASIYA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Awadhesh Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State: Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP For O.P.No. 2: Mr. Kaushal Kishore,Advocate ----------- 7 11.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the complainant/informant and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences punishable under section 498A and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It was submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is ready to lead a conjugal life with his wife with full dignity and honour. However, a counter affidavit has been filed by the informant stating therein that the petitioner had remarried. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he had remained in custody since 16.11.2009 till his release on provisional bail as per order of this Court dated 29.04.2010. Petitioner has filed a supplementary affidavit stating therein that he is ready to pay Rs. 1000/- (one thousand) per month by way of maintenance to the informant/complainant. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner would deposit the aforesaid amount 2 regularly till any decision in future is taken by any court of competent jurisdiction. Learned counsel for the informant/complainant raises no objection to it. In the above view of the matter, the provisional bail earlier granted by this Court vide order dated 29.04.2010 is hereby made absolute subject to the condition that the petitioner, as per his undertaking, pays an amount of Rs. 1000/-(one thousand) per month 15th day of every month commencing from September 2010. So far the maintenance for the month of August 2010 is concerned, he shall deposit the same till 31st of August, 2010. The aforesaid sum would be deposited by the petitioner before the court concerned who is in seisin of the matter. The informant/complainant would be at liberty to withdraw the said amount. It is made clear that this order would be subject to any order, if passed in any proceeding in future brought for the purpose of maintenance or any order passed in future in this regard by a court of competent jurisdiction. In case the petitioner violates the aforesaid conditions the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)