@ HIG COUR OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR N H T AT SB. : HON’BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI J. WRIT PETITION N0. 2228 of 200g PETITIO Sant Kumar Dhfuw, aged about 39 years, Son of Shri Jeewan Lal Dh'ruw, Occupation-Service, ‘ Presen‘tiy working as Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Pufena, Block Baioda Bazar, ,Tahsil Balodal Bazar, District Raipur (C.G,) 7/ ' VERSUS ESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S, Bhawa, Raipur (C.G.) 2 Tho Commissioner, Department of Tribal Welfare, Raipur (C.G.) 3, The Director, Public Instructions, , Raipur (C.G. ' Present Smt, Hamida Siddique, Advocate forpetitioner. smt- Anlu Ahuja, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the State/ respondems, ' . ORDER y (Passed on 22m ofMarch, 2007) Learned counseliapp'earing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed vide order dated 2961993 for a period of two years on probation on the pay scale of Rs. 1200/- pm. and thereafter he was paid regular pay scale, f l NER R ) 0 “ { A W The question of law involved herein as to whether the petitioner is mtitled to regular pay scale w,¢,f the date of initial appointment 0: from the dateof completion of probation period. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as weli as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of la involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in W.P.(S) No, 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh & Others), which was allowed vide order dated 7.1 l .2006. In view of the above-stated submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms; No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotrl‘ Judge w