IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR No.644 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 17.03.2011 M/s Richa Enterprises and another ....Petitioners Versus Sumit Aggarwal ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Vaibhav Jain, Advocate, for the petitioners. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file revision before learned Sessions Judge challenging the summoning order itself on the ground that Magistrate failed to make compliance of Section 202(1) Cr.P.C. before issuing the summons to the petitioners, who are not residing within the territorial jurisdiction of the Magistrate. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (Alok Singh) Judge March 17, 2011 R.S.