-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1422 OF 2010 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1669 of 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7293 OF 2009 Mohammad Umar @ Mohammad Tejuddin Through his L.heirs and others. ..Applicants. Versus The Deputy Collector (ENC) & Competent Authority, Kurla-II and ors. ..Respondents. Mr. S. B. Deshmukh i/b Parvinder Singh Sethi for the applicatns in C.A.W.No. 1422 of 2010. Mr. S. G. Surana i/b M/s. Murudkar and Co., for the original petitioner & respondent nos. 4 to 6 in C.A.No. 1422 of 2010. Mr. P. R. Kadam for applicant in CAW. No. 1669 of 2010. Mr. A. I. Patel, AGP for respondent no.1. Coram : R. V. MORE, J. Date : July 9, 2010. P. C. : 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties. The applicants in both the civil applications claim to be lessees of the premises in question. Respondent nos. 4, 5 & 6 in Civil application No. 1422 of 2010 and Respondent nos. 1, 2 & 3 in Civil Application No.1669 of 2010 are the office bearers of the proposed SRA Co-op. Hsg. society. 2. Declaration under section 4(1) of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (I. C. & R) Act, 1971 was issued in the year 1977. This declaration was challenged by the applicant in Slum Tribunal in the year 2002 and by the order impugned in the petition, the Slum Tribunal quashed and set aside srp -: 2 :- the said slum notification issued under section 4(1) of the Slum Act. 3. Upon hearing both sides, this Court admitted the petition and by way of an interim relief, impugned order, namely, the order passed by the Slum Tribunal, came to be stayed. 4. Now, the applicants have come to the Court by way of present civil applications, contending that respondent nos. 4 to 6 in CAW No. 1422 of 2010 and respondent nos. 1 to 3 in CAW No. 1669 of 2010, namely, SRA scheme housing society, taking advantage of the stay order granted by this Court, have started development of the premises in question. 5. The slum notification issued under section 4(1) of the Slum Act is sub-judice in the aforesaid writ petition. Unless and untill the impugned order passed by the Tribunal is set aside, the SRA scheme housing society cannot develop the suit premises in pursuance of section 4(1) notification issued in the year 1977. In the light of these facts and circumstances, I am satisfied that the interim order dated 7th April 2010 requires modification. Hence, the said interim order is modified in the following terms. That during the pendency and till the final disposal of the above writ petition, the State Government shall not initiate acquisition proceedings in respect of the subject premises under section 14 of the Slum Act. 6. Civil applications stand disposed of. (R.V. MORE, J.)