:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1014 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.1014 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.1014 OF 2007 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.651 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.651 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.651 OF 2006 Javed Rashid Tamboli ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.S.A.Ingawale for the Applicant Mr.A.R.Patil, A.P.P.for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & SMT.R.S.DALVI,JJ. SMT.R.S.DALVI,JJ. SMT.R.S.DALVI,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 18TH OCTOBER,2007 : 18TH OCTOBER,2007 : 18TH OCTOBER,2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned A.P.P.for the State. Perused the evidence as well as the Trial Court Judgment, whereby the Applicant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. There are two eye witnesses viz.P.W.No.1 Sunanda Shikharam Nalla and P.W.No.5 Sachin Bande who have corroborated each other. These two eye witnesses have clearly stated that the Applicant Javed was inflicting blow on the right neck of the deceased with a sword. Even the Medical Evidence clearly corroborates the same. Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case it cannot be said that the conviction is based on no legal evidence. Hence, we are not inclined to grant bail in the above. The application for bail stands dismissed. However, we are inclined to expedite the hearing of the Appeal. 2. Hearing of the above Appeal is expedited. (SMT.R.S.DALVI,J.) (SMT.R.S.DALVI,J.) (SMT.R.S.DALVI,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)