BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twelfth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.9483 of 2011 ARAVIND SUBRAMANIAM ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE JUNCTION POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI, CRIME NO.659/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. D.SARAVANAN Advocate For Respondent : A.RAMAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/sole accused apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 341, and 506(i) IPC in Crime No.659 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and on the basis of complaint given by his father a case has been registered against the petitioner on 17.07.2011. But the case has been registered only under Section 156(3) of Criminal Procedure Code, since the civil suit is pending and the false case has been given by his father and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submits that the offences only under Sections 147, 341 and 506(i) IPC and the investigation is going on and hence he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. Considering the rival submissions made on both sides, it is seen that there is a civil dispute between the father and his son and the civil dispute is pending, and the case was registered on 17.07.2011 and even though the petitioner was not arrested he neither interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.4, Tirunelveli District and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.4, Tirunelveli District, and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the court concerned daily at 10.30 am., until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C Scrupulously. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. sd/- 12/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.4, TIRUNELVELI 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE JUNCTION POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI, 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. D.SARAVANAN Advocate SR.No.31419 GH : 15.09.2011 : 2p/6c ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9483 of 2011 Date :12/09/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/