CRM-M No. 37912 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CRM-M No. 37912 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.01.2011 Rahul Sharma ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Vipan Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Sidhu, DAG, Punjab for the State. ... Alok Singh, J (Oral). Learned counsel for the petitioner while placing reliance on the statement of Vimal Sekhri has argued that Vimal Sekhri has stated that he has been injured by Lucky and his son Vasu Sekhri was injured by Rahul. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that other accused i.e. Lucky and others have been found innocent and have not been challaned. He further stated that he has been wrongly challaned to cause injury to Vimal Sekhri, which admittedly as per Vimal Sekhri, was caused by Lucky. Learned counsel for the petitioner further argued that the petitioner is in CRM-M No. 37912 of 2010 2 judicial custody since 16.6.2010 and challan has already been submitted before the Court and there is no likelyhood of tampering with the evidence. Learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, on instructions from ASI Paramjit Singh, has stated that challan has already been submitted and charges have already been framed. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of this case, present petition is allowed. Petitioner be released on bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 13.01.2011 sk.