CW 4435/10 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4435/10 Rajendra Kumar Nayak & Anr. Versus The District Collector, Jhunjhunu & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 05/04/2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. D.S. Dhariwal for Mr. Sandeep Garssa, for petitioner *** Petitioners, as alleged in the petition, were allotted residential plots by Municipal Council, Jhunjhunu and letters of allotment issued to the petitioners, have been placed on record as Ann.6 & Ann.7 respectively, on 6th June, 2007. Counsel submits that as per site inspection report dt.17th March, 2010, the respondents may dis-possess the petitioners and on this apprehension application has been sent to S.P., Jhunjhunu by one of the petitioners. Allotments have been made to the respective petitioners by Municipal Council, Jhunjhunu Ann.6 & Ann.7 respectively. No adverse order has been passed by either of the respondents and what has been urged by the petitioner appears to be their apprehension and if at all, the respondent takes any decision for dispossession, certainly that cannot be done without due process of law provided under the provisions of the Act, 2009. Even as per site inspection report placed on record as Ann.9, no adverse inference can be CW 4435/10 [2] drawn by this Court that the respondent intends to dispossess the petitioners from the plots which were allotted by the competent authority. This Court finds no substance to interfere in the instant petition, the same stands dismissed. However, if any adverse order is passed, the petitioner will be at liberty to avail remedy under law. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA4435CW10 05-04.doc