IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 7TH JULY 2008 / 16TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 29265 of 2007(H) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ L.PRIYAMVATHA, RETIRED BRANCH MANAGER, PRIMARY CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD, NO.Q.390,PATHANAMTHITTA, RESIDING AT KALPANA HOUSE, KODUMON P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADV. SRI.K.JAJU BABU SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI SRI.SAJEEV.C.KRISHNAN. SRI.T.R.SADEESAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION GOVT.SECRETRIAT,TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,TRIVANDRUM. 3. KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE EMPLOYEESS PENSION BOARD, TRIVANDRUM-695 002, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY/ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR. 4. PRIMARY CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD.NO.Q.390, PATHANAMTHITTA. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.ANU SIVARAMAN-R1 &R2 ADV. SRI.P.V.MOHANAN- R3 SRI.V.G.ARUN - R4 SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR- R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).29265/2007-H APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF ORDER NO.PB. PPO.104/PTA DATED 01/06/05 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P2: COPY OF ORDER DATED 02/07/05 VIDE NO.EM(4)7566/05 ALONG WITH FIXATION AS PER REVISED NORMS ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P3: COPY OF RESOLUTION NO.276 DATED 09/01/06 PASSED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT EXT.P4: COPY OF LETTER DATED 01/09/07 VIDE NO.679/07-08 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P5: COPY OF COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS DATED 31/08/07. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL // TRUE COPY // Rs/ THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No.29265 of 2007-H = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 7th day of July, 2008. JUDGMENT Petitioner is an erstwhile employee of the fourth respondent. She retired as a Branch Manager. According to her, her pension papers have to be forwarded to the third respondent after fixing her legitimately due scale of pay. Let this be done by the fourth respondent within an outer limit of one month from now. If there is any further dispute regarding fixation of pay and revision of salary scale, the petitioner can work out such dispute she may have with the fourth respondent, before the competent authority under Section 69 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. On receipt of the papers being forwarded by the fourth respondent, the third respondent Pension Board will finalize the question of pension without delay. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/070708