IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 16253 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 9th February, 2011. Manjit Singh Petitioner through Mr. R.M.Sharma, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents through Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] In view of the 3rd demarcation report dated 03.02.2011 placed on record by way of affidavit of the Deputy Commissioner- cum-Collector, Patiala, no case to take any further action in the matter is made out as the issues now sought to be raised by the petitioner are seriously disputed questions of fact which can not be gone into by this Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to appropriate an appropriate forum/Civil Court, if so advised. The respondents are, however, directed to permit the petitioner to remove the machinery and/or other articles lying in the premises in dispute. Disposed of. Dasti. February 09, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE