IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5880 OF 2008 Gajala Pravin A.Rashid Saudagar ...Petitioner vs. Madarasa Mazaharan Ulan & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.P.M.Pradhan for the applicant petitioner Mr.I.M.Khairdi for the respondent nos.1 to 5 CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : AUGUST 6,2009 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is the sister of the original obstructionist. The proceedings under Rule 97 of Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 were initiated on the basis of an application made by the original obstructionist. In the said proceeding a finding was recorded by the executing court that the original obstructionist as well as the petitioner have failed to establilsh their possession over the suit property. The said finding has been confirmed in Appeal before the District Court. The finding of the courts below is that there was absolutely no evidence on record to show that the petitioner or his predecessor were in possession of the suit property. In view of the concurrent findings of fact, no case for interference is made out. Writ petition is rejected. JUDGE