IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 35264 of 2010(G) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- V.P.PADMANABHAN, S/O.KRISHNAN, KUNNATH HOUSE,THIRUVALLUR (P.O),KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SMT.CELINE JOSEPH. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CIVIL STATION,KOZHIKODE, PIN – 670 001. 2. TAHSILDAR, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN – 670 001. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P. NARAYANAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/11/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 35264 of 2010 G ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 24th day of November, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner says that on an earlier occasion he made an application to the first respondent, seeking permission for levelling his land for making it a house site. It is stated that the said application was rejected. Case of the petitioner is that subsequently Government have issued Ext.P1 order dated 05-04-2010 and that in terms of clause (2) of Ext.P1 order, he is entitled to convert the land as a housing site. According to the petitioner, he filed Ext.P2 application requesting for review of the earlier order passed by the first respondent rejecting his application. Orders were not passed on Ext.P2 and, therefore, this writ petition is filed. 2. In my view, Ext.P2 was unnecessary. If as stated by the petitioner, what he proposes is covered by clause (2) of Ext.P1 order, he need not seek review of the earlier order. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of, making it clear W.P.(C) No.35264/2010 : 2 : that it will be open to the petitioner to proceed with the work without awaiting orders on Ext.P2, provided it is a permitted activity as per Ext.P1 Government Order. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks