IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.750 OF 2005 AND CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.751 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO.2119 OF 1999 Revannath Yashwant Salunke & Ors. ...Plaintiffs Versus Dnyanoba Balaji Jagtap & Anr. ...Defendants ...... Mr.Ameya Tamhane for Applicants/Plaintiffs. Mr.Pandya for Defendant No.1. Mr.Swapnil Bangur i/b V.Mistry & Co. for Defendant No.2. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. JULY 18, 2005. JULY 18, 2005. JULY 18, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Both the Defendants are represented by Advocates. Hence, affidavit of service is : 2 : dispensed with. 2. Counsel for Defendant No.2 points out that Plaintiffs have not arraigned sister of Plaintiffs Smt.Prabhavati Ashok Raut. This objection, however, cannot be gone into, in the present Applications. It will be open to Defendant No.2 to take out such proceedings as may be advised. 3. As the Defendants have no objection for bringing on record heirs and legal representatives of deceased Plaintiff No.1 and deceased Plaintiff No.2, Applications are made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Amendment be carried out within two weeks from today. No order as to costs. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.