1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01/07/2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN Writ Petition (MD) No.6791 of 2011 1.G.PanneerSelvam 2.S.Vasu ... Petitioners Vs 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Secretary to Government Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Fort St. George, Chennai. 2.The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. 3.The Commissioner Aruppukottai Municipality, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the second respondent herein to consider and pass final orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 03.12.2010 within a reasonable time that may be fixed by this Court. For petitioners ...Mr.S.Ramasamy For Respondents ...Mr.B.Pugalendhi For R1 & R2 Spl. Government Pleader For R3 Ms.Bharathi Government Advocate O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the first and second respondents and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the third respondent. 2. By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing. 3. The petitioners have come up with the present writ petition for a mandamus directing the second respondent herein to consider and pass final orders on the representation of the petitioners dated 03.12.2010 within a reasonable time that may be fixed by this Court. 4. The case of the petitioners is that they have been selected through the District Employment Exchange as Gang Coolie at the third https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 respondent Municipality by proceeding of the third respondent dated 12.02.1987. Considering their long service, the third respondent regularised their services in his proceeding dated 24.09.2004. The petitioners sent a representation to the respondents seeking regularisation, after completion of 10 years of service. But, so far the representation was not considered and hence the petitioners have come up with the present writ petition for the relief stated earlier. 5. Considering the limited scope of the matter without expressing any opinion on the claim made by the petitioners, I direct the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 03.12.2010 on merits and in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Writ petition is ordered accordingly. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Secretary to Government Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Fort St. George, Chennai. 2.The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. 3.The Commissioner Aruppukottai Municipality, Virudhunagar District. GH : 21.07.2011 : 2p/4c W.P.(MD) No.6791 of 2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/