IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.9227 of 2011 Date of Decision : May 24, 2011. Nazar Singh .....Petitioner versus The State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Gagneshwar Walia, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks a mandamus for revision of his pay in the light of the clarificatory Circular dated 30.5.2003 (Annexure P-1). Reliance is also placed on an order dated 28.5.2010 passed by this Court in CWP No.10453 of 2010 (Bhupinder Singh versus State of Punjab and others) (Annexure P-10) who is the similarly placed person. The petitioner also served the respondents with a legal notice dated 28.3.2010 (Annexure P-6) but it appears that no response has been received thereto so far. In these circumstances, however, without expressing any views on the merits of the petitioner's case, I deem it appropriate to dispose CWP No.9227 of 2011 [2] of this writ petition with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and dispose of the claim of the petitioner as contained in the afore-mentioned legal notice, by passing a speaking order, within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Needless to say that if the petitioner is found entitled to, the necessary relief be granted to him within a period of one month thereafter. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. May 24, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE