IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA ------------- Letters Patent Appeal No.2018 of 2010 -------- Appeal against the Judgment and Order dated 16-11-2010 passed by a Bench of this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 4815 of 2010. ---------- Naresh Paswan, son of late Lakshman Paswan, R/o Village Mayaganj, P.S. Barari, District- Begusarai...........................................Appellant Versus 1.The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2.The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Home (Jail) Department, Bihar, Patna. 3. The I.G. Prisons, Bihar, Patna. 4. The Superintendent Central Jail, Bhagalpur.......................................Respondents 2 21-11-2011 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the State. The writ court has dismissed the writ petition preferred by the appellant against his dismissal from the post of Head Warden in Central Jail, Bhagalpur. The writ court has noticed that the enquiry and the disciplinary proceedings did not suffer from any procedural illegality. It was also noticed that the appellant in fact kept himself away from the enquiry. In spite of having participated at the earlier stage he did not file any show cause in reply to second show cause notice served 2 with copy of enquiry report which showed that the charges had been found true. The charges include the charge showing absolute lack of discipline because allegedly the appellant abused the Jail Superintendent and even attempted to assault with foot-wear. The main point urged before us is that the Jail Superintendent influenced the entire proceeding and acted mala fide. From the writ petition as well as memo of appeal it is evident that the Jail Superintendent has not been impleaded by name to answer any allegation of mala fide. We do not find any good reason as to why the Jail Superintendent would act mala fide against the appellant. The suggestion that the incident created mala fide does not appear to be good reason. It is not a case where findings are perverse or without any evidence. The charges found true in course of enquiry relate to acts of indiscipline. We do not find any good reason to interfere in the matter. This appeal is dismissed. Naresh ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) ( Ahsanuddin Amanullah,J) 3