INTHBHON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH JUDICATURB AT BILASPUR W.P. / S) No. ^b} /2011Bntto B<ncl1 PETITIONER: RBSPQNDENTS: Ajay Kumar Dhruv S/o Shri M.R.Dhruv Aged about 26years Occupation -Rural Agriculture Extension Officer Block Ussor Dist-Bijapur (C.G.) VERSUS l.State of Chhattisgarh Through, Secretary , Department of Agriculture Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, RaipurfC.G.) 2. Collector , Bijapur District Bijapur (C.G) 3. Deputy Director , Agriculture , District - Bijapur ( C.G.) ® WRIT PBTITION UNDBR ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ 1^1' 'l HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETiTJON (S) No. 3131 OF 2011 PETITIONER : Ajay Kumar Dhruv VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattlsgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTiCLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTiON OF INDiA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satlsh K. Aanihotri, J. Present: Ms. Deepaii Pandey, Advocate for the petjtioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. GRDERfORAU (Passed on this 20th day of June,2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 14.01.2011 (Annexure P/1), the petitioner, working as Rurai Agriculture Extension Officer at Development Block Ussor, District Bijapur, has been transferred to Deyeiopment Block Bastar, District Jagdalpur, on his own request However, the p^ reiieved to join the new place of posting. Ms. Pandey submsts that once the order of transfer has been passed, it is for th^ govemment to ensure that it is compiied with immediately. She relles on a decision of the Supreme Court in Sfeectem Chandra Ghosh v. State of Assam & others ,in support of his contention that if the order ss not complied with, a directjon can be issued for enforcement thereof. 2. Shri Dwivedi, learned Dy. Govt. Advocate appearing for the State/ respondents submits that that if the transfer orderdated 14.01.2011 (Annexure P/1) is stlll in existence ?nd has not been compiied wlth, appropriate steps would be taken-to comply with the order. 3. If the aforesaid transfer order is still in existence, the government is under an obiigation tocompiy with the same at once. !t is accordingiy directed that the transfer order shail be complied with forthwith, within a period oftwo weeks. 4. Accordingiy, this petition stands disposed of. Satish K. Agnihotn Judge ashok T (1996)108cc 567