l •^-^ '^. fe;. 8<a>, l •%.^-ssj j /f i. ^^ S^-tel^ ^:> f;<\! S-3, ^- IjIGH COIJRT OF CHHATTISGARH M: 3ILASRJR WRrr pETrnoN ro No. 968 ofzcos PETmONERS : 1. Dwakat Sinsh S/o Manohar Sai, aged about 39 vears. 2. Kai.'ash Sineh S/o Bankat Sm.sh. ased 34 vears. 3. Santlal, S/o Kahmman Singh, a.ged about 34 vears. 4. Holi Das S'b Mangai Das. esed about 35 vears. 5. Baharaii Singh S/'o Chandan Singh, aged about 37 vears. 6. Sahadev Sinsh S/'o Karam Sin?h- aeed about 34 vears. 7. Ul Singh S/o Ram Singli, aeed about 38 years. 8. Meghnath S/o Somnafh, aged about 38 years. 9. Raiiiit Sinsh S/o Dhaii Sineh ae.ed about 38 vears. lO.Chedilal S/o Amrit LaL aged about 37 years. 11. Shyam Lal S/o Prem Sai, aged about 3 8 years. 12.Baadhan Smgb. S/o Rammat Smgh, aged about 34 vears. 13.Dheerpa} Singh S/o Itwar Singh- aged about 38 years. 14.Ha.riiiar Smgh 8/'o Ram Sineh, aged about 35 vears. 15.Dilbodh Sinsli, S./o Mohan Singh, aged aboirt 34 years. 16.8ampat Sinsh S/o Chatar Siiigh. aesd about 19 years. 17.Bhuvan Smgh S/o Ume.d Smsh, ased ahoirt 38 vears. 18. Samal Sai S/o P&ool Sai, aged about 36 vears. 5.9.Dharshan Sinah S/o Mehttar Sinsh, ased about 32 vears. 20.Kairia'i Sineb 8/0 Samar Sai aged about 31 vears. 21.Devrai Sineh S/o Puran Smgh, aged about 32 years. 22.Rekha Kumar D/o Jaylal Soni, aged about 19yeare. 23.Krishnapa! Singh S/o Babu Singh, aged about 32 vears. \ 24.Raghuvar Sisgh S/o Umed Siagh, ased about \ 32 vears. 25.Amar Sinsh S/o Ratan Siagh, ased about 39 N11 imiNnnBKWi .Fl- ~"'':^,. """-^^- •-i^! ;;1 ^ ^J £!' ••?;'-.•!?.;<;<fl3'' -z- RESPONDEOT'S years. 26. Prahlad Kiimar S/o Horiial Ya.dav, aged ahoirt 32 vears. 27. Visambar Sin.eh S/o Dharam Sin.eh aged about 34 vears. 28. Sun'abhavan Singh S/o Budhwar Singh, aged about 34 vears. •vf 29.Venkat Singh S/b Laxman Singh, aged about j5 yesrs, SO.Anand Ram S./o Laxniaa Singb, aged about 3i years. 31. Horilal S/o Malguja, aged about 23 years. 32. Gajanand S/o Santram, aged about 31 yeare. 33.Visha3 Das S./o Anjor Das, aged about 36 years. 34.Bhagvvat Singh S.'o La2 Singh, aged about 37 veare. 35.Chhattar Sin.sh S/o Itwar Sindi, aged about 22 years. 36.ChtrapaI Singh S/o Ganga Sinsh; aged about 23 yeare. 37.Dhool Sai- S/o Chamra Sai, aged about 34 vears. 3 8. Umend Ram S/o Dileshwar Das, ased about 37 years. 39. P^-areial S/o Hadbad, aged about 34 yeai-s. 40.Shishupal S/b Kuman Singh, aged about 34 vears. 41.Madanlal S/o Tiketram, ased about 24 vears. 42. Gaya Ram S/o Panchram, aged about 37 years. A51 fhe petitioners are residents of viilage Danganiyakliar, Post Barginagar, Tahsil Katghora, District Korba (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretan', Department of Power, D.K.S. Bhawaii, Mantralaya, Kaipur (C.G.) 2. Chhattisearh State ElectriciU- Board, Dangamya, Raipur (C.G.) tlu-ough its 3. Executive Engineer (Civil) Hasdeo Thennal Power Station, CMiattisgarh State Elcetricity Board- Korba (West) Disti-ict Korba (C.G.) 4. Additionai Cfaief Engitieer (Constmction) Hasdeo TheiTnal Power Station Chhattisgai-h, State Electricit BoarcL Darri. District Korba (C.G.) WRFT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF NDIA [on'tele Shri Satfsh K. Agnihotn, J. Present: Shri Shashank Taata.lr, Advocate for the petitioners. Sliri Prashant Mishra, Advocate General for the State/respondent No. 1 Shi-i Prashant Mishra, Senior Advocate with Shri Vamaendra Mishra Advocate for thc respondent No. 2 to 4, 4 (Passed on 18ia day of October, 2008) Leamed counsel appearing tor the petitioners, on iiistructions, submits that at tliis stage, fhe petitioners do not waiit to coatest the matter on merit at this stage. However, the petitioners restrict their prayer that they may be pennitted to make a representation to the authorities concemed and ia tiim, the respondent-authorities may be directed to consider and decide their representations in accordance with law on its ov>'n merits as expeditiously as possible. Shri Prashaat Mishra, leamed Advocate General appeariag for the State/respondents submits that in the event, representatioas are made. the same shali be considered and decided in accordance witli law, on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of eight weeks fromthe date ofrepresentation. In-view oftlie foregoing, accordme to ieamed counsel appeariag for tiie petitioners, nothing survives for adjudication. Accordmsly, the petition staiids disposed of No order asto eosts. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge lli3!^B::