IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 24TH MARCH 2009 / 3RD CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 9374 of 2009(N) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ANNIE, AGED 45 YEARS, D/O.ANTHONY, CHITTILAPPILLY HOUSE, CHITTILAPPILLY P.O., THRISSUR DIST. BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR SMT.P.A.ANITHA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD (ROADS AND BRIDGES), CHEMBUKKAVU, THRISSUR. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERAMANGALAM, THRISSUR DIST. 3. ANIL, S/O.ANTHONY, AKKARAPATTAKKAL HOUSE, P.O.PURANATTUKARA, THRISSUR DIST. 4. PRAKASH, S/O.DIVAKARAN, MOONAMMOOLAYIL HOUSE, PURANATTUKARA, THRISSUR DIST. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- W.P.(C).No.9374 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 24th day of March, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner's grievance is regarding the alleged action of the 3rd respondent, in blocking the entrance to the petitioner's property. It is stated that the same has been done to defeat Ext.P4, an order passed by the Munsiff Court, Trissur in O.S.No.1693/08. 2. It is seen that the petitioner has already raised his complaint before the first respondent by filing Ext.P6 and therefore I direct the first respondent to consider the grievance raised in Ext.P6, if necessary with notice to the party respondents and pass orders thereon. Taking into account the grievance of the petitioner that ingress and egress is obstructed by the impugned action, it is directed that final orders shall be passed as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 3 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. (ANTONY DOMINIC) vi JUDGE