IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 8679 of 2005 Between: 1 Yarabolu Vijayalakshmamma, W/o. Y.C. Reddy, Resident of Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad, Rep by The General Power of Attorney Agent Y.V. Ramana Reddy. 2 Yarabolu Chandrasekhar Reddy, S/o. Y.V. Ramana Reddy, Resident of Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Nellore District, Nellore. 2 The Station House Officer, Nellore III Town Police Station, Nellore, Nellore District. 3 Manchikanti Radhakrishnaiah, Venkatramana Arcade, A.T. Agraharam, Near Trunk Road, Nellore, Nellore District. 4 Manchilkanti Narendra, S/o. M. Radhakrishnaiah, Venkatramana Arcade, A.T Agraharam, Near Trunk Road, Nellore, Nellore District. 5 Manchilkanti Subbaraidu, S/o. M. Radhakrishnaiah, Venkatramana Arcade, A.T Agraharam, Near Trunk Road, Nellore, Nellore District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus and declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in interfering/adjudicating the civil dispute between petitioners and respondents 3 to 5 in respect of the commercial building bearing door No. 410 to 413, 387 consisting of ground floor and first floor situated at Ward No. 14 of Nellore Town, Nellore District belongs to the petitioners is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No. 2 to return back to the petitioners, the white paper over which the signature of the 2nd petitioner was obtained on 19-3-2005 and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.T.LAKSHMI NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP FOR HOME Counsel for respondents 3 to 5:Mr V.Narayana Reddy The Court made the following : O R D E R: The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1 and respondent No.4 have died and therefore, he wants to bring on record their legal representatives. I am of the opinion that there will not be any need or necessity to bring the legal representatives of the deceased first petitioner and the fourth respondent on record since the petitioners filed the writ petition only seeking a declaration that the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioners and the respondents 3 to 5 as illegal and arbitrary. Counter has been filed on behalf of the official respondents 1 and 2 denying all the allegations stating that they never interfered with the civil disputes between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents and all the allegations made against them are utterly false and without any basis. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as the police cannot interfere with the civil disputes between the parties and this Court also granted interim direction not to interfere with the civil disputes, I am disposing of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 not to interfere with the civil disputes pending between the petitioners and the respondents 3 to 5. The petitioners and the respondents 3 to 5 are at liberty to work out their remedies before the appropriate civil Court. ________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J Dated 9th April, 2008 vrn ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Superintendent of Police, Nellore District, Nellore. 2 The Station House Officer, Nellore III Town Police Station, Nellore, Nellore District. 3 2 CCs to the G.P for Home 4 2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RLD}