@? HIGH COURT GF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Slnqie Bench : Hon’bles riDili Raosaheb Deshm kh J.- Grimina‘ ReVi$i9n Na, 126 9f 2W6 MEMG OF REVlSlON UNDER SECTION ACT 1914} OF THE Present : Applicant by Smt. Amu Ahula, Advocate. (PassedW on 29 June, m9) Heard on admission. 2. The reviSion is dix’ected against the order dated 6.1 .2006 passed by ‘ihe Family’Court in MJ‘C. No. 993‘2005 wheVeby maintenance of Rs.2000i— net month was awarded to the hon-applicantlwife from the date of order. 3. The sote ground urged by counset for the appticant is that maintenance T awarded by the Famiiy Court is excessive in View of the fact that the applicant is earning Rsi SOOI- per month. it is also submitted that vide Annexure Pl4‘ the Additionai District Judge. Korba, has. in an application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act by the non-appiicant herein. also awarded a sum of Rs.700i— per month on 9.9.2004. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the applicant, l am not inclined to accept the contention of learned counsel for the applicant. The maintenance awarded by the Family court is the bare minimum required for survival. 5. This revision has no merit and accordingly dismissed at the stage of admission. ‘ ”r” 4 M‘ i iil‘ l i i sdl- r Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh i i Judge Meena Anupama Dhirey. aged Nokggglimn‘ about 23 years, wife of Mano} Kumar Shantila! Khare. \ Dhirey. daughter of (Urga), Tah. & ‘ _ Distt'. Korba (06.) g