IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 6° Cr.M.P. No. ..l.'-'.'...../2010 (S.B.) PETITIONER : Santosh S/o Shri Mangal Caste Teli Aged about : 26 years, R/o Gram Ghughwa, Post Ouri, Police Station Bhilai-3, Tahsil Patan, District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS ^.•' RESPONDENTS : ,^€<^ ^^^- -/~L \^~^>';' -vp ..^- y ./V~{^ . O' lt/\ ^ ':!) State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretaiy for Home Department (Secretariat) D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2) Superintendent of Police Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 3) Station House Officer, •Police Statiori Utai, District Durg (C.G.) 4) Yoovraj Singh Bisen S/o Not Known Assistant Sub Inspector, Police Station Utai, District Durg (C.G.) 5) Rupram Verma S/o Jagdish Verma aged about 61 years, R/o Ganiyari Post Pahandor, Police Station Utai, District Durg • (C.G.) - 6) . Sardar Shabbir Khan S/o Mohd. Basir Khan,Aged about 40 years, R/o Ghughwa Bhilai- 3, Police Station Bhilai 3, District Durg (C.G.) @ 7) Rajendra S/o Bhukhan Lal, aged about 39 years, R/o Pahandor, Police Station Utai, District Durg (C.G.) (Respondents No.5 to 7 are accused persons) ATBIL. ^ •S^-^l'S' &rfSf CR.M.P. Mo.160/2010 SanTosh versus State ofC.G. & Otliers Shri Abhay Tiwari, counsel for fhe appellant. Shri Paakaj Shrivastava, P.L. for the State. Heard on adinission. The present petition has been ffled bv t&e petitioner praying fhat directions inay be issued to tlie State Govemiaent. the coaceraed S.P. &-, Station House Officer for the i^gistration of fhc case against the real culprits for wluch fhe leamed Judicial Magistrate has already passed tiie order on 8.2.10. In. fhe petition several allegations have been made bv the Tietitioner asajnst fhe police officers includiag fhe atlegation that. sciae of t.he officers ai-e dem.;aidiag bribe for fhe registration of ttie case. Thougb the aISegations liave been aiade ia ffae petition but inerely^on tfae bas.is of siicli aUegations no presumption can be raised af.am.st fhe police officers. TIie docuinents as fijgd toy fhe petitioner shows that on 8.2.2010 fhe learaed Magistrate has directed the concemed poiice station to investigate t.he matter and then to take appropriate action. Leamed M^istrate has passed fhc order bn 8.2.10 wtiereas the petitioner .bas rushed to this Court on 2.3.2010. Tlus Court is of the opioion that the petitioner has apnroached fl'us Coiirt. ia a liaste even without waitiiig ibr sufScient tiiae. The pefition is pre-rcature smd theretbre cannot 'be entertaiaed at ffais stage. The sasae is uable to be aad is heneby clisiuissed. It is however expected fi?oin the State autliorities particularly fhe Superuitenr'^at of PoUce to look into fhe inatter aad to act ia accordance \vifn law. - Sd,'- Pritinker Diwaker Judge -+