1 CRI.APPLN.NO.5161/2010 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5161/2010. (Akhil Ahmad Shafayoddin Inamdar Vs. The State of Mah.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.MA Tandale, Adv. for applicant; Mr.NB Patil, APP for State. *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 11 th January, 2011. ... 1) Heard. 2) In Crime No.105/2010 registered at Ambejogai police station district Beed at the instance of RTO, Ambejogai, viz. Sanjay Naktu Meshram, for an offence under Sections 420, 468 and 471 of IPC, the accused, seeks pre-arrest bail. 3) Learned Counsel submits the accused/applicant has no role in procuring fabricated No Objection Certificate from RTO at Orisa. He simply presented the documents before the RTO, Ambejogai, unknowingly believing that the NOC from RTO, Orisa was genuine. He has no intention to dupe the Government from getting the vehicles of Orisa registered in Maharashtra. 2 CRI.APPLN.NO.5161/2010 4) The averments against the applicant/accused are of serious nature, having a long drawn implications to unearth the network of procuring the vehicles from other State and getting them registered under fabricated documents in the State of Maharashtra and vice-versa. 5) A detailed investigation is imperative in the matter, which can only be done by custodial interrogation of the applicant/accused. No case for pre- arrest bail. Application rejected. The observations are prima facie in nature. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/