IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9578 of 2008 INDRAJEET SAHNI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 18.07.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Case is under Section 392 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. As per prosecution case, while informant was going to his sasural on his Motor cycle, he was overtaken by three others on a Motor cycles who stopped the informant and took away his Motor cycle. It is alleged that police chased and saw the three persons with the looted Motor cycle talking to the petitioner in front of his house. The three persons along with Motor cycle were apprehended but the petitioner fled away from there, but later on surrendered in Court. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case merely on suspicion as it is alleged that he was talking to other three persons who had actually looted Motor cycle. It is further submitted that one of the three persons namely Mahavir Saw has been granted bail by this Court vide order passed - 2 - in Cr. Misc. No. 23482 of 2008. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that there is only one case against the petitioner under Section 302 of the I.P.C. on the basis of suspicion only along with others and there is no other case against him. It is said that petitioner has no criminal antecedents. In view of the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents prior to lodging of this case for any professional crime and the co-accused, who is said to be directly involved in snatching the Motor cycle, has been granted bail by this Court, this application is allowed. Let petitioner Indrajeet Sahni be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- ( Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with Mushrigharari P.S. Case No. 80 of 2007. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)