Revaram Sahu, S/o Heeraram Sahu, aged about 25 years, R/a Vinage; Khauna, PO Khauna, PS Dhariwa, Tah " ‘ & Distt — Raipur (CG) Versus Resgéndents ‘ 1. Dhirendra Kumar, Slo Bhagwat Pd. Kurre, R/o Viliage & Post Sundari PS Palari, Distt Raipur .(CG) Present Address : Through Ashok Kumar Yadav, Slo Raghunath Yadav, Rio Radha Kishan Kirana Store Brahma Puri, Raipur (CG) PS Purani Basti Raipur, Tah & Distt — Raipur (CG) 2. Ashok Kumar Yadav S/o Raghunath Yadav, Rio Radha Kishan Kirana Store Brahma Puri Raipur (CGLf’S Purani Basli Raipur, Tah & Distt Raipur (CG) 3. The Oriental lnsurance Company Limited, Through Division Manager, the Oriental Insurance Company Limited Branch — II Chawia Compiex, Sain Na: —apmicants ‘ Nagar, Devendra Nagar, Raipur (CG) Tah & Distt Raipur ’ Miscellaneous a eal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act Shri SC. Verma, learned counsel for the appellant. None fortrespondents No. 1 & 2 though served. Shrir Sou‘rabh Sharma, learned counsel for respondent No.3. Present : ORDER V (315‘ August, 2019) @ The foliowing order of the Court was passed by Réjeev Gupta, cuJ. Learned counsel for’ the parties are heard on M.C.P. N(j).1847{2005, a petition for condonation of the delay in filing the aopeaL 2) On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and the grounds taken in the application, we are satisfied that the appellant/claimant has succeeded in showihg sufficient cause for the delay in filing the appeal. 3) M.C.P. No.1847f2005; therefore, is allowed and the delay of 25 days in filing the appeal is hereby condoned. 4) Shri S.C. Verma, learned counsel for the appellant is heard on admission. 5) Appellant Revaram Sahu is seeking enhancement of the compensation awarded by the First Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal; Raipur, (for short ‘the Tribunal’) vide award dated 19.04.2005, passed in Ctaim Case No.52/2004. 6) As against the compensation of Rs.6,50,000/— claimed by the appellant/claimant by filing a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act for the injuries sustained by him in the motor accident on 21 .042004, the Tribunal awarded a total sum of Rs.1 50,0001- as compensation along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of‘tiling ofthe claim petition till the date of actual payment. D Shri S.C. Verma, learned counsel for the appellant \lehemently argued that the Tribunal has erred in awerdihg low compensation of Rs.1,50,000/— only though the appellant! plaimant sustained multiple serious injuries including'fractures in the motor accident resulting in disability to the extent of 50%. ‘8) Claimant Revaram Sahu used to earn his livelihood by running a Pan Shop and a Cycle Store. He claimed his income as Rs.3,000/— per month. The disability certificate produced by the claimant before the Tribunal though certified his disability to the extent of 50% it further reveals that the claimant’s disability was of temporary nature 9) On due conSlderatlon of the submissions of learned counsel for the appellant; the reasonings given by the Tribunal in the Imouoned award and the above mentioned broad features of the case more particularly the fact that the disability suffered by' the claimant on account of the iniunes and fractures sustained In the motor accident was of temporary nature, we are satisfied that the compensation of Rs.1 ,50,000/- awarded by the Tribunal does not warrant any enhancement in this appeal. 10) The appeal filed by the appellant/claimant for enhancement of the compensation, therefore, is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed summarily. 7 ,/ v ’ Sd/— CHIEF JUSTICE nimmii‘ Vi