IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 7TH JUNE 2011 / 17TH JYAISHTA 1933 OP.No. 39276 of 2002(A) ----------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- C.O.RADHAKRISHNAN,S/O.KESHAVAN NAMBIAR, THEKKEPPAT HOUSE, MALAMAKKAVU P.O. KOODALLUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.(ADDITIONAL SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, OTTAPALAM) BY SRI.P.G.PARAMESWARA PANICKER, SENIOR ADVOCATE ADV. SRI.SANTHEEP ANKARATH RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL, CRIMES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, WAYANAD. 3. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KASARKODE. 4. OFFICE OF THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` O.P. No. 39276 of 2002 A ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 7th day of June, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ The main prayer in the original petition reads as follows:- “ Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order directing the respondents to pay the arrears of pay due to the petitioner owing to the non fixation of pay from 23-11-1982 till 31-01- 1997 including the salary of seven months due to the petitioner for the period of service under the first respondent from 14-04-1994 to the petitioner immediately.” 2. In the counter affidavit filed by the first respondent, it has been stated thus:- “ Regarding the arrear bill during the period from 19.04.1994 to 22.04.1996, it is respectfully submitted that draft arrear bill for Rs.26857/- including the pay fixation OP No.39276/2002 : 2 : arrears and arrear salary to be paid from this unit was forwarded to the Superintendent of Police, Palakkad vide letter No.F6- 1035/CR/03 dated 04.02.2003. The said amount can be drawn and disbursed through the Superintendent of Police, Palakkad, petitioner was now working there.” 3. In the light of the said averments in the counter affidavit, all that is required is to record the same and to close the original petition. In view of the submission, the grievance of the petitioner stands substantially redressed. Accordingly, original petition is closed. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/08.06 // True Copy // P.A. To Judge