.^ @ c^l}'iy2^ ^. ^ BEFORE THE HIGH COURTOFLdmiMTISOARWAT BILASPUR WRlTPEmlION(S)NO.%^^ /2010 P^titioner RBSPONDENTS 1. 2. .\ft/ y^/ Smt. Agatha Khess, W/o. Yaqub Khess, aged about 53 years, occupation ~ Supervisor, Integrated Woman & Child Development Project, Sector ~ Sisringa, Project ~ Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretaiy, Department of Woman & Child Development, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG) Commissioner, Department ofWoman & Child Development, Raipur (CG) ^^ ^y ^/^/' 3.f District Programme Officer, Department of Woman & Child Development, Distt. Raigarh (CG) 4. Project Officer, Department of Woman 85 Child DevelopmGnt, Integrated Woman & ©hild Developnient Project Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG) ^' 5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat ~ Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG) 6. Ku. Premlata Sahu, D/o Ramesh Kumar Sahu, aged not known, Supervisor, Deptt of Woman & Child Development, Integrated Woman & Child Development Project - Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG) (Sl. No. 170 in impugned order) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22@ € TH®CONSTITUTION OFINDIA, •—t, s' / 1' '\ ^ -^ ...sSF^ /^ .<^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.2667 OF 2010 PETITIONER Smt. Agatha Khess Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others ® RESPONDENTS (Writ Petition under Articles 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri A.N. Bhakta, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ajit Singh, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER rORAL) (Passed on this 4th day ofApril, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instruction, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition, as the relief sought for in this petition does not survive for its adjudication. 2. No objection from other side. 3. It is ordered, as prayed for. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Gov^ri Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge