-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4 OF 2006 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 21 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 907 OF 2002 Baijnath R. Upadhyay..... ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors.. ... Respondents. Mr. U. V. Singh for the Petitioner. Mrs.U. V. Kejriwal, APP for Respondents. CORAM : R. M. LODHA & CORAM : R. M. LODHA & CORAM : R. M. LODHA & NARESH H. PATIL, JJ. NARESH H. PATIL, JJ. NARESH H. PATIL, JJ. DATED : 1ST AUGUST, 2006. DATED : 1ST AUGUST, 2006. DATED : 1ST AUGUST, 2006. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : Subject matter of contempt is between the Court and the Contemnor. The contempt petition has been dismissed by the Court for want of appearance. We find that no sufficient ground has been made out for restoration. Criminal application is dismissed. Sd/- (R. M. LODHA, J.) (R. M. LODHA, J.) (R. M. LODHA, J.) SD/- (NARESH H. PATIL, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)