c ^ ^- ; IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C. No. ^ ^j / 2009 (Arising out ofW.P.(S). No. 3257/2009) Applicant < ^y^f^^M y^y^- Prabhaker Nagdeve, S/o Shri L. R. Nagdeve, Aged about 54 years, Presently posted as SDO (Forest), Keshkal, North Kondangaon Forest Division (Wrongly mentioned as Kanker Forest Division in impugned order), R/o Forest Colony, Keshkal, District North Bastar (C.G.) Versus ResDondents : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Forest, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Shri Sudarshan Chandravanshi, Dy. M.D., District Union, Kanker Forest Division, Kanker (C.G.) APPLICATION FOR MODIFICATION OF ORDER DATED 09.07.09 PASSED IN W.P.(Sl. No.~3257/2009 —78 311^'^T ^icb WT Sff^T SD*lIcft ~3~sr ^|<4ld^ ^-al^^Ko, f^<rti^y ....'.„. _..*_ M< C-C- •7^ 1 ^, -inn- <41*<dl (b*<l<b ~ ; tll^zuu^ 3n^?TTi^^ (^t^^) IF^TTW^f^T SB : HOM^BLB SHRI JUSTiqE PRITENKER DIWAKER 17.07.2009 Shri Ka.sif Slial^eel. coil Ms. Sunita -Jaiii, P.L. -f^tnsel for the appUcaiit. •f^r the State. The preseut applicauo4 modi&cation of the order dal 3257/2009. According to the coum last paragraph of the order fhat fhe order impugned dat€|cl remaiii stayed till tlie next will be atlowed to peribiTii postuig. Couusel for tlle appli^ typographical mistaice becau| oftherefore the question pf ni| wUl not be tliere. hi view of above, flie dated 9.7.2009 be read as unller; "lu. the ineauwhile, fhe effect.to aad the petitioner in .his present place of postiri| chNid^l'i TTO^f ^' ft^ <Pn^i< '^T 3tfiTH SH^T has beeu filed by Uie applicarit for ed 9.7.2009 passed in W.P.S. No. ?I for tlie appMcaiit, .iii the secoud lated 9.7.2009, it has been typed, 30.06.2009 (Aunexure P/ 1) shall |.ate of heariiig aiid the petitioner |.is duties iii the present place of ^ailt submits that it is inerely a |5e.the petitiou itseLfwas disposed .^utionmg "till next date of heai'm.g"' :cond last paragraph of tlie order tmipugned'order ,may uot be .given sli|allbe allowed to pe.rfoi'm.-his duty: j li' ;C—78 ^T^l ^F ^Job ^TT 3n^?T «»*iicr> 's 's^T T^i^i<n^, y>Tii-(H<i<o, [sxni-yy ....'.„. ^..!^^v-^c- 7^ 1 . *11*<dl (b*<l<!b ^n^i ^q^sp (^{^^) \ ^snw^f^Ta^r -z Couusel for the ap-^ was typing xnistake in. fhe] representafion aiid therefcj representation froiii flie da| Qrdered a.ccordiiigly. <^Hid41^ 'RW^Jf ^fft^ <f^^i< '5fr 3tRPT 3?T^T licaat furfiier submits that as there |order, tlie applicaiit could uot mal<e |Te he be given ten days time to ffle |:e of copy of this order, Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge .J