IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8969 of 2002 Rajeshwar Prasad Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ----------- 5 02.8.2011 Mr. Shanti Pratap, learned counsel for the petitioner, who has got this disposed of case under the heading ‘To be Mentioned’, submits that the date of retirement of the petitioner as recorded at Page Nos.3 & 7 of the order dated 21.9.2010 has been wrongly recorded as 31.7.2000 which ought to have been 31.7.2002. He further points out that the impugned order being Annexure-1 to the writ application, there is typing error at Page No.6, wherein, the impugned order has been described as Annexure-4. This Court, on perusal of the materials on record, is satisfied that there is typographical error both in respect of date of retirement as also in the description of the impugned order. It is, accordingly, directed that the date of retirement of the petitioner as mentioned at Page Nos. 3 & 7 would be read as 31.7.2002 in place of 31.7.2000 and the impugned order which has been quashed by this Court so far it relates to the petitioner is 2 Anenxure-1 and not Annexure-4 and to that extent, the typographical error at Page No.6 of the order is also directed to be corrected. Accordingly, the order dated 21.9.2010 stands modified to the extent indicated above. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)