C ^y-yo IntheHonble HiahCourt pfChhattishgarh at Bilaspur (C.G.) W.P.(s) No. 6^(8 Petitioner ....... (^)-Smt. Vaheeda Khan c< W/0 Shri Abdul Jahid Khan ^uJ^ Aged39Years ^^ .<•° Upper Diyision Teacher, \*-y ..••'"" ( H. M.) Govt. Urdu, e>y,^^"'' M-S. School Rajnandgaon, /•''c-xy ^-y/y" District Rajnandgaon ( C. G.) Versus i^'y, .A.?' o^^espondent...... (j) State Govt. of Chhattisgarh '" Through:- Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department & Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) r-.Os^ v .€^n •f'. --,^*^-^v « sS^^^ ^-2) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Weifare Department Rajnandgaon (C.G.) f3) District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon. (C.G.) Writ petition under articles 226 of the Constitytion of India for issuance of writ in the nature of MANDAMUS, CertiprarL Prohibitipn and pther suitable WRIT or wnts, Order or orderSi Direction or directions. HI6H COURT OF CHHATTtSSARH AT BILASPUR W. P.(S) No. 218 of 2007 Petitioner : Smt. Vaheeda Khan Verais Reqiondents ; State 6ovt. of ChhattiS9arh and others SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Present; Mr. Ajay Shrivastwa, counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER (Passed on this 18th Day of January, 2007) The folbwing order of the Court is passed by Satish K. Agnihotri, J. 1. Leamed counset fi^pearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit tiiat the facts of the preant writ petition is similar to that of in W. P. No. 1463/2(K)6 (Aeman Jain vs. The Slate Sovernment of Chhatfrisgarh & cuio-ther), which was disposed of vide order dated 10.11.2006. They further submit that ¥- the question of law involved is also the same. 2. In view of the above stated aibmissions made by leou*ned counsel for the parties the writ petition is disfios&d of terms of the order dated 10.11.2006 passed by this Court in 1463/2006 (Aemcn Jain vs. The State fiovemment of ChhatKsgarh & another), No order as to costs. Babiu Sd/- SatishK.Agntom Judge