IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CRIMINAL REVISION NO.26 OF 2009 Bhaskar Joshi … Revisionist Versus State of Uttarakhand and another … Respondents Dated: March 9, 2009 Mr. Siddharth Sah, Advocate for the revisionist Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State HON. DHARAM VEER, J. This criminal revision, preferred by the revisionist under Sections 397/401 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter to be referred as Cr.P.C.), is directed against the judgment and order dated 11.2.2009 passed by Sessions Judge, Nainital in Crl. Revision No.Nil/2009, Mahendra Singh Negi Vs. Bhaskar Joshi. 2. Sri M.A. Khan, learned brief holder produced a report sent by In-charge Inspector, Kotwali Lalkuan, Nainital. On this basis of this report, he submitted that the order impugned in the revision stands executed and as such the revision stands infructuous. Sri Siddhartha Sah, counsel for the revisionist also submitted that in view of the report submitted by learned Brief Holder in the Court today, this revision has been rendered infructuous and prayed that the same may be dismissed as infructuous. 3. In view of the above, the revision is dismissed as infructuous. (Dharam Veer, J.) 09.03.2009 Rdang