IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27153 of 2010 MD.AURANGIEB son of Md. Mukhtar---------Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 3. 9.8.2010 An explanation given by the learned Magistrate for cancellation of petitioner’s bail is not satisfactory. Direction of the Court was only to take initiative of divorce (Talak) even by pronouncing three times as was proposed by the wife and inform the court for its acceptance. No option was given to the court to cancel the bail if the same was not accepted. So the order of the Magistrate appears without jurisdiction. Petitioner, who is accused in Complaint Case no.1767C of 2008, is directed to continue on the bail so granted to him. He is also directed to be released from custody forthwith. Let this order be communicated through fax to the court of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in connection with the aforesaid case at the cost of the petitioner. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh,J )