IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 550 OF 2008 SECOND APPEAL NO. 550 OF 2008 SECOND APPEAL NO. 550 OF 2008 Shri Madhukar Vishnu Patankar ...Appellant (Orig. Plaintiff) Versus Shri Vishwas Vishnu Patankar ...Responent (Orig. Defendant) Mr. Nilesh S. Patil for the appellant. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 28th August, 2008. DATE: 28th August, 2008. DATE: 28th August, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant. 2. The appellant is the orignial plaintiff and the respondent is the original defendant. Both are the brothers. The defendant had prosecuted the plaintiff on the ground that he had assaulted and injured. In that prosecution, the plaintiff was acquitted. After that, the plaintiff filed Regular Civil Suit No.177 of 2000 claiming compensation for malicious prosection. The suit was dismissed. Thereafter, the plaintiff preferred Regular Civil Appeal No.152 of 2004. That appeal was also dismissed. Both the Courts below held that the defendant had prosecuted the plaintiff and the prosecution had ended in acquittal. However, both the courts came to conclusioon that the prosecution was not malicious. In view of the concurrent finding of fact by both the Courts below, I find no substantial question of law involved in the matter. The Appeal stands dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA, J.) (J.H.BHATIA, J.) (J.H.BHATIA, J.)