IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 6TH JUNE 2008 / 16TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 6042 of 2008(T) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- SUDHEER, AGED 27 YEARS, S/O. MUTHALEEF, THEKKEVILA THEKKATHIL, VENGA P.O., SASTHAMCOTTA, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.B.HARISH KUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE SECRETARY, KAYAMKULAM MUNICIPALITY, KAYAMKULAM. 2. THE HEALTH SUPERVISOR, KAYAMKULAM MUNICIPALITY, KAYAMKULAM. 3. A.K.POOKUNJU, SAJANA MANZIL, PATTANIPARAMBIL, KOTTUKULANGARA, KAYAMKULAM P.O. BY ADV. SRI.K.R.SUNIL FOR R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 6042 OF 2008 T = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 6th June 2008 J U D G M E N T The petitioner complains that a building adjacent to his shop room is in a dilapidated condition. Petitioner has produced Ext. P3 photographs of the building which is alleged to be in dilapidated condition. Complaining of the present condition of the building and seeking to take appropriate action against the owner of the said building, the 3rd respondent in this writ petition, petitioner has filed Ext. P3 complaint before the 1st respondent. It is alleged that the 1st respondent has not taken action on Ext. P3 and under these circumstances this writ petition has been filed. Taking into account the above it is directed that if Ext. P3 complaint has been received and is pending the 1st respondent will take necessary action. However, any such action shall be only with notice to the 3rd respondent. 2. Writ petition is disposed of as above. petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-