IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12191 of 2009 RAJ KUMAR RAI . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 5/ 24/2/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the Bihar State Religious Trust and for respondent No.5. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 22.6.2009 as affirmed by the order dated 2.7.2009 unseating him from the post of Chairman of the Trust Committee. In view of the fact that the appointment of the petitioner made on 28.11.2005 was tenure bound for three years which was accepted and enjoyed by the petitioner and which time period has run its course, there is no occasion for the Court to interfere with the impugned orders. The submission that subsequent appointment has been made for five years of others is a matter which can be tested more appropriately in a fresh application by the appropriate forum, if so advised, when questions of waiver on part of the petitioner on that claim in view of his acceptance of the tenure bound appointment on 28.11.2005 shall also arise for consideration. Since this Court has held the absence of any 2 locus on part of the petitioner simpliciter on grounds of expiry of tenure any observations contained in the impugned orders with regard to any alleged deficiencies in discharge of duties by him are superfluous and has no relevance. The Court orders accordingly. The writ application is dismissed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)