c$) IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAMIAT BILASPUR (C.G.) W. P. (Cl No. 2-D^-L of2011 PETITIONER Smt. Aarti Gurudwan, D/o Shri B.P. Gurudwan, aged about 23 years R/o M.D./116, Dipka Colony, Gevra Project, Korba, District-Korba (C.G.)) -X RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. \ /^ \y^<v ^Y^f ^f/ State of Chhattisgarh : Through Secretary Higher Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) Guru Ghasidas University, through the Registrar, Koni, BUaspur (C.G.) ^ /^•' %/ '•^ - ^y 3. Korba City College, through the Principal, T.P. Nagar, Korba, District-Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER AR'NCLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON CC) No. 2051 of2011 Smt. Aarti Gurodwan. VERSUS State ofChhattisearh & Others. RESPONDENTS WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE OF ITIE CONS'nTUriON OF INDIA SB:Hon'ble Shri Safefa K. Asnhotn.J, Shri Prateek Sfaarma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyerforthe State/respoadentNo.l. Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate for the respondent No. 2. 3. Amit (Passed on 04fll day ofAugust, 2011) Shri Shanna, leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits fhat pursiiant to the order dated 20.04.2011 passed by this Court, fhe petitioner was admittedto B.Ed. course and the result could not be pronounced as the petitioa was pending consideration in tUs Court. Since the petitioner has already appeared in the examiaation, the respondent-University may be directed to pronouace the result. Shri Shrivastava, leamed counsel appearing for fhe respondenf University submits that since the petitioner has ak-eady appeared in the examination nothiag remains for adjudication in this matter as the prayei- was only for a direction to pennit the petitioner to appear in the B.Ed examination in 2011. In view of the clear and unambiguous statement made by Sfari Shrivastava, it is expected Ihat the result shall be pronounced as early as possible with mark-sheet so that ifthe petitioner intends to take admission in any other course, she may not be deprived of opportunity for seeking adraission to any other course as in all the coui-ses, there is a cut offdate for admission. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge •^^iwvWfS.fv.^^f^^s^^'