IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37341 of 2008 Rehana Khatoon @ Shah Jahan Begum, wife of Murtaza, village gamharia, PS Dhaka, Dist. East Champaran – Petitioner. Versus 1) State Of Bihar, 2) Prem Pushpa Kumar, son of Shri Ram Janam Sharma, village Arai, PS Daudnagar, Dist. Aurangabad, at present Subdivisional Accounts Officer, Sikrahana, Dist. East Champaran – Opp. Parties. ----------- 2 18.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. This application has been filed for quashing the First Information Report of Dhaka PS case No. 85/2007, dated 17.7.2007 registered for the offences under sections 406, 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471/34 of the Penal Code. The Subdivisional Accounts Officer, opposite party no.2 has filed the aforesaid First Information Report alleging that he has learnt that petitioner is not the duly appointed Aangan Bari Sevika. This court prima facie finds that the Subdivisional Accounts Officer has no concern with the appointment or the administration of Aangan Bari Centers. If any complaints are filed before him, he ought to have brought it to the notice to the Child Development Project Officer or the District Magistrate instead of filing the First Information Report. Despite what has been said aforesaid learned counsel for the petitioner also points out that there was some confusion in the alias name and as such under wrong impression the First 2 Information Report has been instituted. The petitioner is duly appointed Aangan Bari Sevika and, therefore, this First Information Report is misplaced. In the circumstances I quash the impugned First Information Report. It would always be open to the aggrieved party to move the concerned authority if there is any anomaly in the appointment of Aangan Bari Sevika. This application is allowed. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)