é Singié Hana : <3 (“it IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. (S) No. ‘59 (73> OF 2011. PETITIONER K Santram Dongare, Son of Pardeshi Ram Dongare, aged about 43 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School Hathadandu, Block Nawagarh, Distt. Durg (C.G.} VERSUS District Education Officer, District Education Office Durg, District Durg (C. G.) 3. Additional District Education Officer, Education District Bemetara, District Durg {C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Block Nawagarh, District Durg (C.G.) WWWWtlWWWililfWfW li r ~ WE /l State of Chhattisgarh, by“ m Through : The Secretary, d ‘ W“ u lww (1‘- ‘ Department of School PREmo‘.dWg"‘W”. ............y -‘ Educatlon, D.K.S. Bhawan, . Zia m«am Raipur (C' G.) @ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA A\ 9C WWWEW urn—armW3 £5)” Q K’ml 111200 Wm(q3fga§u) am ET W; ax}m mm mmmm WW1§wm $afcmm SB Hon ble Shri Manlndra Mohan Shrivastava, J. 30-09-2011 Shri Mirza Hafeez Baig, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Praveen Das, Deputy Government Advocate for the State/respondents on advance cop). Heard. Learned counsel appearing; for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to benefit of advance increments on account of he having passed B.T‘I. examination efore appointment at his own cost. lt is submitted that the issue involved n the present petition is no longer res integra and the same has been fl ally decided by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxe vs. State of M.P. & 01's., 2009 (III) MPJR (SC) 59. It is further sub itted that this Court has also taken a similar view in his order dated 06 02-2009 passed in W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. Learned counsel for the titioner further draws attention of this Court to order dated 29—04-2010 assed in Writ Appeal No.124 of 2009, wherein relying upon the judgme t of the Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) and the 0rd r passed by this Court in another Writ Appeal No.87/2009, directions ha e been issued for consideration of the case for grant of two advance incr ments as per circular dated 21-09-1974 issued by the State of Madhya radesh, after verification of the facts ’pleaded in the petition. Learned counsel for the r spondents submits that now the State. Government had issued a circul r on 05-01-2011 and the case of the petitioner would be examined in the light of the decision of the State Government. mmwm In view of the statement made above, this petition is finally disposed of with a directionto the respondent authorities to consider and decide the ner for grant of t/vo advance increments in view of the ircular, which has been issued by the ifter verification of the facts pieaded in months from the date of receipt of a Z Tumane tate Government on 05'01-2011, z the petition within, a period of three copy of thig titaé‘m 2‘“ s . . . Sd/-‘ Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge S o