l-.ff' • ^ fW .ViW IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATBILASPUR (C.G.) ^^2f.- . W.P.No/rl /2006 PETITIONER RESPONDENT sy'M^ ^''...p" v^'1 ^•' ^cy' .-•v -SA, ROHAN LAL S/o Gajara, Aged about40 years, R/o Garra,Tah.-Chhuikhadan, Distt.- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS ;1. State of Chhattisgarh Through - Collector, Rajnandgoan (C.G.) /2. Ram KumarS/oTulsiRam, R/o Dhangaon, Tah. - Lohara, Distt. Kawardha (C.G.) / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 326/227 OF THE CQNSTITUTJON^F IND1A m •<? A- XI-HC-78 sn^r^rf^iR) tlW 311^1 **<i* z/;?~— ^l^ ,^ *TW<'irs*iHieh 3^'<ii<iici<<, »Tfl*i'i<o,Riniuy _.__ yv.ft^Ma- (^^/°-^_ ••^ 2ft0 3n^?T iraw (l?i3g^8T) N<1IW ;Bfef SfI^T 22.11.2006 p^titii exttre Additional No oue appears for tb.ej out. Records of fhe writ By way of fhis writ Constitution oflndia, the pe^ fhe order contaiaed ia Annextu On perusal of Aanexui|c judgmeat p^sed by fhe ia civil appeal No.01-A/20C|3 been drawn. Needless to say fhat passed in a regular civil apj ffled under Articte 227 of th^ inaintamable, In view of fhe aboye,] mmntainable. However, the the appropriate reinedy petipon perused. availabte '<iwfivf<(1-< i:iii<!iT^tecA<Ri'K;i< ^ari^irsn^T petitioner when fhe matter is cafled ition ffled uuder Article 227 of the .tioner has prayed for quashinent of p-1. P-l, it appears that fhe same is a District Judge, Khairagarh(CG) and thereafter, a decree has also ple remedy against such an order ()eal lies elsewhere aad the petition Constitutton of India would not be fhis petitiou is d^niissed as uot jietitioner wouM be at Uberty to avaU under the law. Sdl- _. Sun»><"'1narsinha judge P.T.O. '^'