CWP Nos.4503, 20586 and 20588 of 2008 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP Nos.4503, 20586 and 20588 of 2008 Date of Decision: 27.04.2009 Sarojni Lady Constable ...Petitioner V E R S U S State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present: Mr. S. K. Redhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A. K. Gupta, Addl. A. G., Haryana. AJAY TEWARI J. (ORAL) These three writ petitions contain common questions of law and are proposed to be decided by this order. The facts are being taken from CWP No.4503 of 2008. The petitioner claims that she should be sent for the Lower School Course in B-1 category. Since persons junior to her have been deputed. In reply, the stand taken is that the petitioner did not reach the bench mark of 31 marks and thus could not be deputed. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the rule did not provide for any bench marking and that some persons who had lesser marks than the prescribed bench mark had also been sent. Learned counsel for the respondents has argued that a Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 7952 of 2004 titled as Naresh Kumar v. CWP Nos.4503, 20586 and 20588 of 2008 -2- State of Haryana and anothers had recognized the prescription of a bench mark. As regards the examples, it has been explained that all those persons were deputed prior to 13.2.2007 which was the date on which the bench mark was prescribed. In my opinion, there is no merit in this writ petition. Consequently, this writ petition is dismissed. ( AJAY TEWARI ) April 27, 2009 JUDGE ashish