IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 21 OF 2009 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 21 OF 2009 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 21 OF 2009 Amirsab Faridsab Shaikh ...Applicant (Orig.Accused No.6) vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr.S.G. Kudle for the Applicant. Mrs.M.H. Mhatre, APP for the State. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 3, 2009 DATED : FEBRUARY 3, 2009 DATED : FEBRUARY 3, 2009 P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. Heard Counsel for the applicant. 2. The only allegation against the applicant is that the applicant has identified the person who had executed the document and later on, it transpired that the said person had impersonated a person who was already dead. 3. It is submitted that the applicant had no knowledge about the impersonation by the main accused and he had merely identified the said person. Apart from this allegation, there is no other allegation against the present applicant. The other identifying - 2 - witness has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Criminal Application No.4625/2008 by order dated 19th January, 2009. 4. In my view, the custodial interrogation of the applicant is not necessary. He has not signed the original release deed as a witness. The interim order granted by this Court is confirmed. 5. The application, accordingly, is disposed of. (V.M. KANADE, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)