IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8368 of 2008 Surendra Prasad Roushan, S/o Sri Shiv Narayan Singh, resident of village Kothia, P.S. Tajpur, District Samastipur…Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Secretary, Human Resources Department, Bihar, Patna. 2. The District Magistrate, Samastipur. 3. The District Superintendent of Education, Samastipur. 4. The Block Development Officer, Sarai Ranjan, District Samastipur. 5. The Block Education Extension Officer, Sarai Ranjan, District Samastipur. 6. The Mukhiya, Srinagar Gram Panchayat, Gangapur, District Samastipur. 7. The Panchayat Secretary, Srinagar Gram Panchayat, Gangapur, District Samastipur. 8. Mithilesh Kumar, S/o Baidya Nath Mahato, P.S. Mushri Gharari, District Samastipur………………………………………….………Respondents ---------------------------------- 02. 11.08.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary corrections in the descriptions of respondent nos. 4, 5 and 6 in course of the day. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that during the pendency of this writ application, petitioner had moved the Appellate Authority and his appeal along with other appeals of some other candidates were allowed and concerned Panchayat officials have been directed to hold fresh Counselling. However, he submits that the Panchayat Secretary has not done the same 2 till now. In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ application is disposed of with a direction to the Panchayat authorities to comply with the order of the Appellate Authority if the same is not under challenge and has not been set aside by any higher authority. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)