C.R. No.793 of 2005 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.793 of 2005 (O&M) Date of Decision:10.09.2009 Risala Ram and others .....Petitioners Versus Suraj Mal and others ...Respondents Present: Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ramesh Hooda, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. J.S. Bhatia, Advocate for respondent No.4. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No. 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No. -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The revision is against the order granting relief of injunction in favour of the plaintiff. The relief had been disallowed by the trial Court but in the appeal filed by the plaintiff as appellant, the Appellate Court granted relief of injunction. The defendant, aggrieved with the order, has filed the revision petition and this Court, while admitting the same had granted stay of operation of the order. 2. The suit is of the year 1996 and learned counsel for the parties are willing to state that the trial of the case could be expedited and disposed of, if it had not already been done. I do not think it necessary to join issue on the merit of the case again of the rival contentions of the parties. The civil revision petition, therefore, C.R. No.793 of 2005 (O&M) -2- contains merely a direction for an expeditious disposal of the case if it has not already done within a period of six months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 3 The civil revision petition is disposed of in the above terms. Both parties agree that the order of this Hon'ble Court suspending the injunction granted by the Appellate Court shall remain in force till the disposal of the suit. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE September 10, 2009 ashish