IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 12313 of 2005 Between: 1 Waddera Bharath Labour Contract (Civil) Cooperative, Society Ltd (TBC-567), Rep by S.Yadaiah, S/o.Muthaiah, R/o.8-168, Chandanagar , RR.District. 2 Sri Arundathi SC Labour Contract Cooperative Society Ltd, (672), Rep by P.Somaiah, S/o.Mallaiah, R/o.38-388, R.P.Colony, Jagadagirigutta,Balnagar Mandal, RR.District. 3 Revathi Waddera Labour Contract Coop. Society Ltd(670), R/o.36-171/1, Deenabandu Colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad-72 ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Govt. of A.P., Rep by its Secretary, Municipal Administration Urban Development (K1) Dept, Secretariat,Hyderabad. 2 Kukatpally Municipality, Rep by its Commissioner, Kukatpally, RR.District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not issuing the tender schedules as per tender Notice No.KPM/HD/1/2005-6 dt.26-5-2005 to the petitioners societies (SC & ST) Labour Contract Societies) and insisting to pay the schedule rates as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Circular No.13628/K1/2002 dt.14-10- 2002 and consequently issue the tender schedules forthwith, and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.A.RAVINDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN. & URBAN DEV. The Court made the following : ORDER: The petitioner questions the tender notification made on 26.05.2005. On perusal of the said tender notification, it is evident that the time for completion of works is within three months. As the period of tender itself is over, nothing survives in this writ petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. __________________ (V. ESWARAIAH, J.) 16th July, 2008 Js. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 Govt. of A.P., Rep by its Secretary, Municipal Administration Urban Development (K1) Dept, Secretariat,Hyderabad. 2 Kukatpally Municipality, Rep by its Commissioner, Kukatpally, RR.District. 3 2 CCs to G.P. for Municipal Administration and Urban Development, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad.(OUT) 4 2CD copies. Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VSMI}