IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH …… Civil Revision No. 7467 of 2011 Date of decision: 05.12.2011 Sunita ..... Petitioner Versus Jarnail Singh ..... Respondent …… CORAM: HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Devinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. *** RITU BAHRI, J (Oral) Challenge is to the order dated 13.06.2011 whereby the evi- dence of the plaintiff-Sunita has been closed on the ground that there was no compromise effected between the parties. Perusal of order dated 13.06.2011, reveals that the Court had granted last opportunity to effect the compromise and one PW was examined on 13.06.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that dispute is re- garding the common passage falling between the land of the plaintiff and the respondent. He further contends that plaintiff/petitioner wants to examine herself as a sole witness. The case is pending adjudication since 2007, in the interest of justice one opportunity is granted to the plaintiff to examine herself as witness. Civil Revision No. 7467 of 2011 -2- In view of the above, the order dated 13.06.2011 (Annexure P-4) is set aside and the trial Court is directed to grant one opportunity to the plaintiff/petitioner to examine herself, subject to payment of `2,000/- as costs. Civil Revision is allowed. (RITU BAHRI) JUDGE DECEMBER 05, 2011 sham