Smgv‘ g§fi€h $ wp MM) grow gmw éwgJ nymim» XI-HC—ZZ EVWm ,WmraJ’Faarw K _ Q%HJ\ %Lmk hVLV’k ‘L WWW') 1 3:“”a5m 4L} Wigs? 7 x?! —-}:Vr m Kan/Wm VVVW (AKANKNL kid i2Wm/wd/ 1N ? M19 (MW—w 9K A a W :.‘Qw Wtwvdgvw man WW§@&W§T( mmmw %an%ma‘n%§r ll .12.2001 Heard Shri Awadh Tripathi, learned counsel f0}. the petitioner$. Heard also Shri Rajiv shrivastava, learned Panel for the respondent / x Lawyer State. It is’ stated that though arbitration proceeding is going on, revenue recovery proceeding is also going on {AWNwgat is therefore We I, contended that if proceeding ‘ I ‘ of revenue recovery is not \ (*1? stayed during the pendency M‘ of the matter before the E Arbitrator, the purpose of M the arbitration shall be I?“ ifrustrated as far as this i. petltloner is concerned. w; foA Shri Rajiv Shrivastava ,? submits that the petitioner have CV ~ I should /, approached the L— Mr s mm rm»: < gaW) 'xJ WWI??? wa‘f z}: FER? Tfwwv @n- W 311% . I: wési 31am? afaa Arbitrator in this regard. After hearing counsel of both sides, as the \) / petitioner has already approached this Cpurt, now y instead of this matter in the file of the Court, it may be disposed of as follows:— / Let arbitration be concluded expeditiously and preferably within six months from the date of ‘h receipt of this order. At the same time, it would be .v‘ in the interest of fair arbi tration that the%‘ revenue case No.2/A/76/97- 98 concerning the revenue recovery sought to be made against the petitioner is stayed until the Arbitrator passes an appropriate order in this regard. 3§ Hence, the case is dis posed of . d 7- we \1 Sd/i ; r1 ‘ \jv \v’ GRPRJ—FSIZ/ —. 5 i209 le— [,0 0/ 00;» (1 \V‘ M. ’1/ \u" {Shief Justice H LLJiir it as ya