IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12835 of 2005 BINDESHWAR TIWARI Versus THE CHAIRMAN,B.S.E.B & ORS ----------- 2 05.05.2010 Mr. Satya Ranjan Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dharmeshwar Mishra, learned counsel for the Electricity Board are present. The writ petition was filed for payment of the post retiral benefits of the petitioner who superannuated as an unskilled Khalasi, Electric Supply Division, Rajgir, Nalanda with effect from 30.9.2004. The details of the dues have been set out in paragraph 1 of the writ petition. A counter affidavit was filed on behalf of the Board, copy whereof were served on learned counsel for the petitioner on 30.9.2008, in which it is stated that the admitted retiral dues of the petitioner has been paid by the authorities, the details whereof is placed at paragraph 5 of the counter affidavit. There is no rejoinder to the counter affidavit, although learned counsel for the petitioner orally disputes the calculation. 2 Taking into consideration the statement made in the counter affidavit, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to raise his grievance, if he feels aggrieved by any of the calculations, before the authority concerned and which shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law. Bibhash ( Jyoti Saran, J.)