1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 2621/2007 (Prakash Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 19/7/2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. Ramesh Purohit for the petitioner. Mr. Vishnu Kachhawaha Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State Perused the order impugned, challan papers and the statement of the prosecution witnesses so far recorded. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that in the first information report, the allegation is against mother-in-law Smt. Balidevi that she caused burn injury to the deceased. Smt. Balidevi has already been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 09.05.07. Learned public prosecutor opposed the bail and submits that the petitioner is husband. I have carefully gone through the statements of parents of the deceased. It appears that right from the FIR, the allegations are against Balidevi. Of course it has been stated in the FIR that family members also supported in causing injuries. Be that as it may. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that co-accused Balidevi has already been enlarged on bail by co- ordinate bench of this Court, having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, without commenting on the merit of the case, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. 2 Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Prakash S/o Kanaram be released on bail in CR No. 350/2006 P.S. Mahamandir, district Jodhpur, provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP