HIGH CGUR OF CfiHATT§$GARH §T EiLiEEPaR mvisian Bench: (3’3 \ii‘M: HON ELE J‘R i RbH§F§¥iA u HOS BLE MR §Q i. «iHANrWA‘R J“ Crimimi imgzeai i\§a.4i 0f 2W5 ppeiiant Ripta Sic: Agiu Nageaya, aged {5 * ai!) yearg, Ocsug-wan AgrmmMrist Rh) Wiage 3hedmi, Poi. 3mim. Bairgmpur, Disirict—Sgirguja {C G ) ”m versas $iate of Chhamsgar ; mmug} $iai§an House Officer‘ Poke Staiicn $a€ ampur, gia’rmua uja (3.35“; And Ci'imEnai Aggeai Na§55 9f 2:955 umt Jasa uai Mag .aiya Sic Bidiyus Uraon aaed Q5 yams Ocsupatwr: Labaui, 0 Viiagr Bhea’m Ponr‘e Balfamyw, Mata .m—gui §U3 StatEGf‘a ResEo¥dent AQQeiian‘tr (m Jam {c.G.) versus Siaie 0f Ch awsgarn {hmurw station HGu Offi’8 Dehbe amiiui‘ Eai mpu., Lxw $1: guga \b a (APPL‘A S u D R GEbTMN 3(4 (2) OE 1HE u ¥’ CX Resgondent P{esen* - M' Aahlj Samar cm'r‘ae! fa, {he anpeihnis Mr Sandeep Yadav Dy Gow Advocate far the State JUIEGMENT §$Ri§Li {Passed on 29* January, 201 1) T.P.Sham1a, .1:- u 1. mamina? Appeai NGA"; of 2GD5 and 155 of 2605 are aris§ng au’: of the “am! cnun aud arde sf ssrtewce dated 31 12.2mm passed jhdgment of by the Secard Adam ua‘. Sessmna Jaage RmmKgwr in Scs$mns Tum Na‘38gi‘34, memo , 'n y ave be‘mg mspasetj 0f my ‘has camma §udgmént . n h). 2. GhaEiwge L“. these aweais is t0 the iudgmea'z f canvgciian and Gmar m” 1 segwtence :jamd 3’1. 2.2mm passea‘ by the Semncé Adt§it§ana§ Sessmns Judge, ,ikmbikapur in Sessians Tria! Na386194, whemby & whéamuna‘er iaamed $$cand A di‘iona'§ Se3s§6ns .judge after hcidiag the a§§e§%ants gu§§ty mr mui'dey of Gnaimar in sham comman §nte atisn canviaed i'nem 1 under Section 332 Gr 3§2i34 0f the LRC. and senterzceé ta urmergo mprisonment far aiie and to pay fine 0f Es25‘9GQL each; in defau?‘ 0f paymant 0f fme t0 further underge RA. for five years‘ Enike fine cf R3531Ofji‘zé has been awarded‘as; campensaticn ta wife a? daeeased Chalittar. '“< ' . Eor§¢mmq f . ‘ rs y :mpugned en the greuna . mat ‘ Withoui .l mere K bemg . eny . Esta . a: » evidence, ihe {riei Ccur: ”nae conwcied and sentenced the epeeiianis as efsmmentioneé end in reby cnmmii‘ted. he 33% case c ihe pmeecuticn, 0n the fatefui day of 2‘3 15.2mm at abnut 2.3g pm. ene A§gu became uncenscious in ihe hcuse sf Chaiitter which wcs énfcrmed t0 ihe pyeeeni appei§ante, €hen they came to the hneee of deceased Cha§iiiar and tank Aagu, 'zhereafieri ihey ciaimeda upon the deceased feieting to w'iehcrafi and asseuited him, thereafter, ihey dragged ihe deeeaeeai near hand-pump and nomad 4—5 buckeie dgny weier apnn him, deceeeed (manner became unccneeieus anc; thei’eafter he n‘Eed. FIR. was %edged by Tiidev Rem Negesiya (PW-1) vine EXP/1. Merg was recerded vine Ex‘Pi’Z. inveengating efficer nmceedee‘ fer me scene a? occ rfenee and aner eummcning the witnesses EXP/3, inqueei over dean bcdy of Chemaz’ was prepafed v§de Ex.Pl4. Spe"; map was prepafee‘ by petwari vide EXP/5:. i vestigehng efficer eise wepared sent map vide EXHE‘). Seeci hedy was sent to Gevernment Hesnttet, Eetramnur vtde ExFit5 where Sr. ?.L.‘Jerma (PW-11) cene’uctee eutepey vtcte EX.PI’Z€; end feund ene iaeerated 'eund evet rt§ht eyebmt' 0t t x 1/2 em. ue te ’nene deep. Ettty water mixed with sane wee feunc; inside t; chee ene etnmech. Case at death wee nmbebty asphyxia. L, 5. tatements i the witnesses were tecerded undet $ectien i6“! e? the CRPAE. end after cempi tien ef investigation charge sheet wee ftiee etere the Coert at Judiciei Meeietrete First Cieesi Remenuigenir whe in \ turn Gemini Led ihe ease te the {Eeurt oi Seesiens, Surguie, “rent where Cu , ”r 5‘{ 3 v I U) §eamed 3ecand Additéona! Sesska .3 Judge ' i.%i’ap:.ar {eseWed the case 0n iransfer for triaé‘ .n crd'w La prm'e trc 3 'm of ihe accuseéfappeHani , i'he pmseauiion examined as many as e§even wiinesses Statements cf the accusediappe§ianis wem recsrded under Sesiicn 313 cf fne Cr.P.C., in wuub m y dmiea the cimumstances appearmg agaénsi ihem and Ema: a.” .ouencx: and fams armiicamn én ’E‘ne crime in quesiian. A?&er af.‘ m‘ing an apporwnét" 6f hearing is fhe pames, ieameai Seasné #dakmna' :a sswns wage AT pur convicte£€ and santenced ma appaiiaws as aforemeatianed. We have heam a“ Ashgat § kar, counse: far the aweiiants am Mr. $.zm e; Vadav; DyEcvtAdwcme far me $ia€e, geruaed ac mdcsmen: imgcugnbd a .u rewc d 0f ire mm Cwr‘ Learnai “mama: .ar we aupehants “u mits hat in .e g e ent case canvictisn :3 ”asea an Ihe ewdence Gr Tiidev Ram Nagasiya (F’W-i} Johan Nages§ya \. N 2’ JEuian Khairwar (PW-3), Mahan Ram Nages§ya (3%“, and Nman Kispnta '3‘“ -5‘ v c have seen tha incident As per case of the prosesuiiany on ;..e wcund of ‘ unc'a“ tha gracem ypeaanis anmyed and caused Gne singie injury over isfi yebmw sf the decea3ed‘ €hereafier they dz'agged the deceased near hand-pume and pauired 4-5 buckets dirty water m§xed wiih sand upan the deceased, the deceased became unconscious an fnereaftea' he die . Learned ceunsei funhe: submn we a per ease e? ine rose nan, the preeen‘i apnelients were hmding exe and stick end they have tcid than ‘naey wiii kéiE Chantiar Le. ihe deeeased, bu they nave no? caused faia: ingury by axe end enek. This snows ins? ihey have anneye upon ne deceased cn eccc' ef r n un g * re: acnvxty and he 'e pou 4-5 buckets diny weier ueen fne deceased; but hes net caused eny §njur' w§ih Went to cause his death, therefme, if ‘zhe evidence edduce... un behen c‘ €ne prcsec ' en r aw . ed 3.. its face vs“ e, {can the act af the eppeiiants dces nct a" t beyond the scape at Sectton 3M Part-H at the i P " teamed counsei ccr ended n t "etetNe er we eppettent :e Atgumes to rd intne hcuse et’ the ateceesea' i. hated m tue activtty of witchctett, in these circumstances, ehneyence ct the appetients was not unneturet en tn the .‘ a @ 4; staie 0f annayance, pcuring sf water was aisa n0: unnaiwaix an the ma? } { \ J Com whiie canviciing the appeiianta ..as ‘mpaaea ‘ane RsESAEOi— each um: ..as a Jame“ cornper‘sa’nor‘ .s v1." e 0f me aeceased and same is nct just aw reasonabie’. mDn the amer hand, $earnea' $tate counse! suppeHed the gudgmem mpugned and submits ihai kncwmg the fact tha': deceased was agaa? about 5G years the appeaiants have peured 4-5 buckets d€rty watea' ueee him and he died as a resui‘i a? suffocaeon by peuring each water. The appeimnts were ravmg kncwiedge ma: by thei m, deceaeed Lkantte. may die, iherefc e, the acx e the appeHents square: : fags w§thin the emE‘fof Section 3(32 ef the i.. ‘C. and the triei Court has righiiy convicted and eentenced‘ihe eppeiiante as aforementiened. -11.in aider to appreciate the e gun‘enis advanceu on heueif cf the parties, we have examine me ewdence add'med on bena ef the prceeeution. 12in t: e present case, unnaturai death of deceased Chaiittar has net been substantieiiy disputed on behalf of the appeiients, on the other nend, aieo eetebiished by the evidence of Dr.P.L.Verma (P‘ 41) and eutoeey report Exam} which reveeis that cause of death was eewyxe mneaiiy as a resu o‘ ditty water and sand inhaled by him Se h was homicmei in nature. 13.Ae regards the compiicity st the apeeiiant in the crime in question 1 conviction is based on the evidence of Tiidev Ram .tageeiya (PW-. ,, Johan Nagesiya (PW-‘2; Muian Khairwar (PW-3), Mohan Ram Ragesya '(P‘M 4) and Nutan Kispota (PW-5) who have ciearty deposed that the appeiiants assauited the deceased, dragged him near hand-pump and poured $5 buckets dirty Water upon him. hresence of dirty water and sand in trachea corroborate the evidence of the aforesaid witnesses. Defence has cross-enawmeo these witnesses at iength, hut has not been ahie to eiicit anything tn the: cror‘s-exarwinauon to dtscredit their 5 evidence rotating to the aforesaid fact that theappeiiants have not dragged the deceased and have not poured duty w er upon him. @ 14.Ev§d‘e'nce o: mesa m nesses coupied with medicaE védence raveai ma? the awaiants have pauu'ed 4-5 buckets GMy water upan 5G yeafs agea‘ aid person which inheied dirty water and eand and died es a reeuit st euffccetton‘ Defin ety, u e act cammitted by the .appet arts Is W gust, proper and naturai, but tt is ammit to raid hat the appeitante have poured dr’ty water \Mu. intent to caqse aeem vf the deceased. Evidence adduced ch behat. e he dreeecuttun ae eufftctent fer drawing inference that the appeila...s date eeHeed hom‘mdai death or the deceased, eat have net caused injua'y with intent‘tc cause his death; thetefci'e, the act of the appei ants dces Pet travei cm'cnu t e scape of Sectten 304 Part-ti ct thetRC. A._ U‘i . “mile convxctiug the appeiahts under Sectiens 3&2 cr 3a$34 at the .P.C., the that heurt has net considered the ataresatd aspect and ereb" “cm'hitteo i iegaiity. taFor the tcregoing reasens, Criminai Aepeai Nc.4’t at 2G95 fiied en hehait cf appeiiant Ripta and Cri. ihai Appeai Nc.155 ot‘ 20% tiied ch hehatt ct appeiiant Smt.Jaso Eat Nagesiya are partty aiiowedr Cehviction & sentence at the appetiants under Sections 3G2 or 392134 of the l ...D .V. PL are hereby aitered to Section 304 Part-ii of the LPJC. 1‘7.As regards the que on cf sentence reiative of the appeiiarts WW was iyina uncenscious in the house of the deceased which gives cause at annoyance and commission" ct“ aforesaid ctfence. ecr‘sw and the mitigating circumstances, sentence tc the pericd aiready undergcne Le. since 235.23% ii today, icr abcut 5 years and more than 5 mcnths weuid he sufficient sentence tn the appeiiants unuer Secticne 304 Part-ti ct the i.P.C. and ccnsiderind the circumstances in whici they have pcured such dirty were, tine of \s.25,GGOI- each as compensattcn tc was ct the deceased .s unjust, u eretcre, the appetiants are hereby sentenced to the pericd aireaoy undergcne is, since 235.26% ti i tcday. They he reieased tc. ‘hwith. if net required in any other cases. Sd/- ‘ Sd/- T. P. Sharma I R_l__ Jhanwar Judge Judge,