Crl. Misc. No. M- 5353 of 2009 Banwari Lal vs. State of Punjab Present: Mr.Sandeep Punchhi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Aman Deep Singh Rai, AAG, Punjab. Mr.Vijay Lath, Advocate for the complainant. **** While issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this Court on 26.2.2009:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the the petitioner had been involved in this case merely because he had attested the surety bonds of Lalit Kumar in the earlier case being Lambardar. Notice of motion for 28.4.2009. In the meantime, in the event of arrest, the petitioner be admitted to interim bail subject to his furnishing personal bonds and surety to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. However, he shall join the investigation as and when called and shall abide by the provisions of Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.” Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from SI Kishan Singh, has submitted that during inquiry by Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nangal, the petitioner has been found innocent and is not required in this case. In view of this, present petition is rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. (SABINA) JUDGE April 28, 2009 anita