IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32110 of 2008 PANKAJ SAHANI, SON OF DEWANAND SAHANI, R/V BAKHARI PURVI, P.S. BAKHARI, DISTRICT BEGUSARAI-------------------PETITIONER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR---------------------OPPOSITE PARTY. For the Petitioner : Mr. Shubhash Pandey, Adv. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwari, A.P.P. ----------- 06. 22.12.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 394 and 397 of the Penal Code and has been implicated in this case during investigation at the instance of Nageshwar Mahto who also implicated one Sunil, who has already been admitted to the privilege of bail. It is further submitted that petitioner’s antecedent is absolutely clean. Let the court below verify whether Sunil implicated by Nageshwar Mahto, has been admitted to the privilege of bail as also the fact that petitioner’s antecedent is absolutely clean and if both the facts are correct then the petitioner, namely, Pankaj Sahani is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri H.K. Tripathi, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Begusarai in connection with Bakhari P.S. Case No. 07 of 2008. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha,J.)