.,,^3*^%^"^, ^fv %. "t^'y\s ^ ^y .S^SaS^ '^ /Sf' ^o'-' ^ST •^i'i<l<vl'4, ESiTlly'Ko, f«<i?1i'M*j,< an^r -^^; (• W? 3il%?! WljN; q>s<<I?i^ ~^^ Tf t^^ Tf^R?R i? W.P. N<|>. 310/200S PETITIONER Shalini v< 32 veai's, No. C.54 frop.t of )UT (C ' Vi ^rma, W/o S.K. Verma, aged about Sliiksha Karmi, Class-II, R/o. Plot jin front of house of B.P. Pandey, in cjld Rawanbhata, Radhaswam.u-iagar, trsus RESPONDENT 1. State of| Panchay^t 2. State . of School 3. Chief Eii Janjgir-C|] 4. Chief E^ Raipur (C;G) Writ Petition under Articlel SB: HON. SHRI DHIRENDRAl 25-09-2008 Mrs. Anju Ahuja, couns^l Mr. Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Jaiii, PL for fhe State. This petition is dtrected| (Annexure P/10), whereby th) Chhattisgarh, through Secretary; Departnient, Raipur (CG) Chhattisgarh, throi^h Secretary, Ecjiucation, Department, Raipur (CO) ^ecutive OSicer, ZUla Panchayat, ^iapa (CG) cecutive OfEicer, ZiUa Panchayat, 236/227 ofthe Constltution of Indla MISHRA. J for the petitioner. Mvocate General and Ms. Sunlta asainst the order dated 26. 10.2004 petitioner was not allowed to join -I'W^ WStV IIOTIWT, n'ntCTH —I-'S/197—3/2008 —40,000. ll);~t E: . »II<;ifi W IS^R 'S's? "MiqiMf, a^ly'Ko, fs<(yil.L)^< •w^! •Era%' ('^qt3?s?) ^l^i«*fll^W<^ ^ 'f^St lR>i^>< ^affiraan^r ui her transferred place ancp. original place of posttng inj Sarkhon, Distt. Janjgir. Leamed counsel ^for petitioner was transferred P/5) from Navagarh, Distt. execution of fhe fa-ansfer ord<| Principal of her school vide e.ave her ioinine in the officel Panchavat, Raipiir vide joining, she was not Panchavat, Raiuur, despite h & P/9 and ultimatety, she w{ place of posting wifhout Leamed coiinsel for fhe vide order dated 6.7.2005 dated 26.10.2004 fAnnexiire vii&e Jfanieir- Leamed counsel for since the iaipugned order o| staved bv thls Court on 6.7.' aUowed and fhe impuened o|[ she was directed to ioin at her Govt. »Higher Secondary SchooL Ann^xure post^d [the petitioner subiaits that fhe order dated 2.9.2004 (Annexure ^njeir-Champa to Distt. Ralpur. In ;r. she was relieved on 6.9.2004 bv [Annexure P/6 and fhereafter, she of Chief Executive Ofiicer, District P/7. However, even after her in any school by fhe District ;r representations of Annexure P/8 bs directed to retum to her orieinal canceling fhe transfer order. further submits fhat this Court staved fhe ODeration of fhe order IP/IO). fortnatlv petitiJDner hid flhe State/respondents submits fhat Annexure P/10 has already been 005, fherefore, fhis petition m.ay be •der be set aside with libertv to fhe T\iV^ P^fi? IR^?^?, ITSRT?^ —FS/S97—3/2008 —40,000. XI-HC—7i v •^ST ^!i<4!d<.i, ^y^i^, 1^?ray 3ii^r q>T'i^N; ^TSIT sn^! %qN? WTW ^if??? sni?i 3 4il<)!<-l^l-< TW^S if fs<S 'vfS^K ^•aTRnan^f State/respondents to tal^e proper administrative steps in the petitioner, as per adinmistrative connection with transfer o exigency. In that view of fhe aiid fhe impugned order' aside. However, the Stat appropriate steps with petitioner, as per adniirustrfctive i4atter, the mstant petition is allowed da^d 26.10.2004 (Annexure P/ 10) is set ;/respondents are at llberty to take k'eeard to transfer/posting of fhe exigency. _ Sd/- D^nd^M^«* Judge