1 S.B. Civil Contempt Petition NO.220/2004 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2300/2001 Shanker Lal Vs. Dr. Lakhan Lal Meena & Ors. Date of Order : 10-12-2004 HON’BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA,J. Mr. Anand Purohit, for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner’s allotment of land was cancelled in revision petition filed by the Gram Panchayat. That order of cancellation was challenged by filing the writ petition i.e. SBCWP No.2300/01. It was stated by the petitioners that they will apply for allotment of land in view of their old possession. The direction was issued by the Court on 15.3.2002 that respondent shall consider the application of the petitioner and if there is no impediment then the Panchayat make allotment of land to the petitioner on market price. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, now the Gram Panchayat is demanding cost of the land and for that purpose, issued notice dated 22.6.2004. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, respondents have not 2 right to demand the amount mentioned in the said notice dated 22.6.2004 as the Gram Panchayat cannot recover the market price of the land as on today. The subject matter is beyond the scope of the contempt proceedings, therefore, the contempt petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the orders of the Gram Panchayat if he has any case. [PRAKASH TATIA],J. Praveen