1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 78 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 78 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 78 OF 2007 IN IN IN FAMILY COURT APEAL NO. 66 OF 2006 FAMILY COURT APEAL NO. 66 OF 2006 FAMILY COURT APEAL NO. 66 OF 2006 Lalita Ajay Khedkar. .. Applicant. vs. Ajay Ashok Khedkar. .. Respondent . Mr. P.J. Pawar for applicant. Mr. Abhaykumar Apte for Respondent. .. Coram: J.N. PATEL &, Coram: J.N. PATEL &, Coram: J.N. PATEL &, A.A. SAYED, JJ. A.A. SAYED, JJ. A.A. SAYED, JJ. Date: 16TH APRIL, 2007. Date: 16TH APRIL, 2007. Date: 16TH APRIL, 2007. P.C. . Heard. 2. The respondent-wife has moved this application for enhancement of maintenance to their child Pooja as she has started going to school. The Family Court has directed the appellant-husband to pay a sum of Rs. 700/- per month as interim maintenance to the child. In view of the fact that she has started attending Jr. 2 K.G. an additional sum of Rs.300/- per month would meet her expenses. Therefore, we enhance the interim maintenance from Rs. 700/- per month to Rs. 1000/- per month from 1.4.2007 towards interim maintenance of Pooja. The application stands disposed of. No order as to costs. 3. The learned counsel for the respondent-wife submits that since the order passed by the Family Court, the appellant-husband has not paid a single paisa. The learned counsel for the appellant-husband submits that he will seek instructions in the matter and advise his client to clear off all the arrears of maintenance. 4. We make it clear that in case all arrears of maintenance are not paid by 30.4.2007 along with the current amount of Rs. 1000/-, it would be open for the respondent-wife to get the order executed against the appellant-husband. (J.N. Patel, J. ) (J.N. Patel, J. ) (J.N. Patel, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. )