IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 8378 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: SEPTEMBER 27, 2010 Anand Kumar .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and anothe r ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH. PRESENT: Mr. Ravi Partap Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG, Haryana, for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. In this case, notice of motion was issued on 7.7.2010. Reply is filed. In the reply, it is stated that the petitioner has not made any averment in the entire writ petition that he has submitted application for appointment. I have perused the writ petition. No such averment is found in the entire writ petition except in the list of dates and events. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. If the petitioner had submitted any application for appointment, he would be at liberty to file fresh petition giving proof of the same. September 27, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika I JUDGE