IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC No. 12 of 2011. Decided on: May 11, 2011. Surjeet Singh ….Petitioner Versus O.P. Sharma …Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Vishal Panwar, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner complains violation of the judgment, dated 27.8.2010. Having gone through the reply filed by the respondent, we do not find any contumacious conduct on the part of the respondent. However, it is made clear that in case the petitioner produces willingness of the private respondent, in the writ petition, to work in any vacancy, the private respondent shall be adjusted in that vacancy and in the resultant vacancy, the petitioner shall be re-engaged, in case he is otherwise eligible to be appointed, and continued till he is otherwise replaced by the regular recruitee. 2. The writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice May 11, 2011 (Justice V.K. Ahuja), [pankaj/krs) Judge.