HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 8.B. : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. WMT PETITION (S) No. 1611 of 2007. PETITIONER Sampuma Lal Sidar, S/o Purushotam Sidar, Aged about 36 years, Assistant Teacher Govt. Primary School Basinpali Block Sarangarh Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary Education Departmeat, >.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education OfBcer Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer Block Sarangarh Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) Present: Shri Sanjay Patel, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER ar (Passed on 20" March 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that fhe fact and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same to th&t of in Y^hwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Mumcipal Corporation, Durg and anothw {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Learaed counsel appearing for the respondente does not controvert the said submission. 2, In subsequent cases; i.e,, Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Verma vs. The State Govt. of Chhattisgwh and another) and other connected matters, decided by this Court on 15- 12-2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretary'; Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Diploma in E4ucation Examination, it was clarified that the nomenclature of the Basic Training Institirte, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed and renamed ss Diploma ifl Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Verma vs. The State Govt. of Chhaltisgarh and another) CSuoral Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwai Vs, Munidpal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether Ihe petitioner has acquired D.Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per tfae circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and farfher whether he has been paid two advance increments or npt. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Ainit