1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5070 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.5070 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.5070 OF 2005 Ashokanand M. Jalgaukar ...Petitioner Ashokanand M. Jalgaukar ...Petitioner Ashokanand M. Jalgaukar ...Petitioner Vs. Vs. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents ----- ----- ----- Mr. Tejesh Dande Adv. for Petitioner Mr. Tejesh Dande Adv. for Petitioner Mr. Tejesh Dande Adv. for Petitioner Mr. R.M. Patne A.G.P. for Respondents Mr. R.M. Patne A.G.P. for Respondents Mr. R.M. Patne A.G.P. for Respondents CORAM: F.I.REBELLO & ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO & ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO & ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. DATED: 6TH DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 6TH DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 6TH DECEMBER, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Rule. Heard forthwith. . Rule. Heard forthwith. . Rule. Heard forthwith. . The Petitioner is running a Zunka-Bhakar . The Petitioner is running a Zunka-Bhakar . The Petitioner is running a Zunka-Bhakar centre. In similar such other matter the Petitioners centre. In similar such other matter the Petitioners centre. In similar such other matter the Petitioners have moved the Apex Court against the order of this have moved the Apex Court against the order of this have moved the Apex Court against the order of this Court. The statusquo has been granted. Court. The statusquo has been granted. Court. The statusquo has been granted. . In these circumstances the Petitioner would be . In these circumstances the Petitioner would be . In these circumstances the Petitioner would be entitled to the statusquo as ordered by the Apex entitled to the statusquo as ordered by the Apex entitled to the statusquo as ordered by the Apex Court. Petitioner’s right to run the Zunka-Bhakar Court. Petitioner’s right to run the Zunka-Bhakar Court. Petitioner’s right to run the Zunka-Bhakar Centre, would be subject to the final order passed by Centre, would be subject to the final order passed by Centre, would be subject to the final order passed by the Apex Court in the matters which are pending before the Apex Court in the matters which are pending before the Apex Court in the matters which are pending before it. It is for the Petitioner to intervene in the it. It is for the Petitioner to intervene in the it. It is for the Petitioner to intervene in the pending matters if so entitled to move the Apex Court. pending matters if so entitled to move the Apex Court. pending matters if so entitled to move the Apex Court. . Rule made absolute. No order as to costs. . Rule made absolute. No order as to costs. . Rule made absolute. No order as to costs. (F.I.REBELLO J.) (F.I.REBELLO J.) (F.I.REBELLO J.) (ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (ROSHAN DALVI, J.)