THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.M.A.No.2695 of 2002 JUDGMENT: The 1st respondent filed O.S.No.631 of 1986, against the 2nd respondent, in the Madras High Court, on its original side, for recovery of certain amount. The suit was decreed and after the decree became final, the 1st respondent filed E.P.No.107 of 1996 in the Court of I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, after obtaining a precept. An item of immovable property was attached. At that stage, the petitioner filed E.A.No.194 of 2002, under Rule 58 of Order XXI C.P.C. It was pleaded that the appellant purchased the suit schedule property from the 2nd respondent under an agreement of sale, dated 18.04.1984, and by paying a sum of Rs.5,40,000/-, took possession of the property. Further payments were also pleaded and she contended that she is in possession and enjoyment of the property. The application was opposed by the 1st respondent. The E.A. was dismissed through order, dated 23.04.2002. Hence, this C.M.A. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the 1st respondent. The necessity for this Court to deal with the matter, on merits, is obviated, on account of the fact that the matter is said to have been settled between respondents 1 and 2 and that the full satisfaction of the decree was reported. For that, the very attachment becomes unnecessary and the execution proceedings get terminated. Therefore, the C.M.A. is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Dated:03.08.2010 GJ