WP(C) 269/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE T VAIPHEI Heard Mr AK Hussain, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr BJ Ghosh, the learned State counsel. Also heard Mrs A Bora, the learned standing counsel for the Finance Department and Mr K Das, the learned counsel for the respondent No.3 and Mr S Sarma, the learned counsel for the respondent No.4. It is stated by Mr BJ Ghosh, the learned State counsel that this writ petition has become infructuous in view of the subsequent order passed by the State respondents conceding the relief claimed by the petitioner. The learne d counsel for the petitioner however prays that a direction may be passed by thi s Court for granting all the consequential benefits in terms of the order dated 24.08.2011 to the petitioner. The prayer appears to be quite reasonable. Consequ ently, the respondent authorities are directed to grant all the consequential be nefits together with all the salary arrears from the actual date of his joining the post of Lot Mandal. The aforesaid directions shall be carried out by the res pondent authorities within a period of two months from the date of receipt of th is order. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. No cost. The letter dated 24.08.2011 is hereby made a part of the record and marked as ’X’.