^pt<^^ iMffii F RFKKH ilillaLC 0E:ri'i.-i> IN THE HON'BLE HIGHCOURTOF^HHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^LRITPETITIOIUSLNO^^g6 QF 2010 PETITIONER: Savita Jaiswal; W/o Shri Pradeep Jaiswal, aged about 35 years, R/o Village and Tahsil- Wadrafnagar, District -Surguja ,(C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: o ..••' f^-^^ ^'•.^y ^^y ..;<c^ ''•.x'^ n^'v ?•'•' f: <y\~ v>v x>^,^*/ &i.'<?S'to^Si*» ^f '%syf 'sys'"^' -^g^fS^^' y 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through, Secretary Panchayat,Department,D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Collector Surguja (C.G.) 3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Surguja, Ambikapur, District - Surguja (C.G). ,/ 4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat,Wadarfnagar , District Surguja, (C.G). 5. R.S.Sengar, Incharge Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat,Wadarfnagar, District Surguja, (C.G). ^ WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER -^ •s i-^uS&i '^^ "<^ !\\° ^"^ -^ww^, '&^w1is, 'fsTaray .U:.£:.^).....!'^.'S^<ii^. sn^i ^i foi'sh WIi 311^1 WRW •s' <." aii^ftraqT (1pf3^q) SB : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRlft-m'KER DIWAKBR 04.10.2010 Shri A.K.Yadav, counsel foil Shri Vaibhav Goverdhan, PJ State counsel submits th^ representation to the resps. 3 8s pass appropriate order for the paj accordance with law. In view of the above, tl] petitioner is directed to file fresh from the date of receipt of copy ol sbwfd'iil-f iwrcff *' ft^ ^R?R ^3lfWT3II^[ the petitioner. L. for the State. At the' outset it has be^n submitted by counsel for the petitioner that he is not pressin^.tbe reliefs 10.1, 10.2 & 10.3. He however submits that the petitio^jier has not been paid saiaiy since January 2010 and is facing financjial hardship. it let the petitioner make a fresh 4 and the said respondents would yment of salary of the petitioner in le petitioner t8 disposed of. The representation within three weeks this order and in tum the resps. 3 8s 4 are directed to pass appropri^te order in respect of the payment of salary to the petitioner with a| further period of one month. The resp. No.2 Collector-Surguja is ajso directed to look into the matter and to ensure the payment of sa{ary to the petitioner in accordance with iaw. 1 it is made clear that this CJaurt has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authority concemed would be at liberty to decide the representation strictly in accordance with law. Sd/- . ,:, pritinkerU^akar Judge