IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 438 OF 2007 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 438 OF 2007 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 438 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3075 OF 2003 Shri Kumar Baburao Gadhave ... Petitioner Vs. Collector of Solapur & Anr. ... Respondents (Respondent No.1 is a contemnor). Msr. Geeta P.Mulekar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. A.A.Kumbhakoni, Associate General a/w Mr. D.A.Patil, AGP, for the State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 27th February,2008. DATE: 27th February,2008. DATE: 27th February,2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. As per the directions given on the last date, Mr. Jagdish Patil, Collector, Solapur, is present in Court and he has filed a fresh affidavit stating that the representation of the petitioner has been decided and rejected as per the order dated 25.2.2008. A copy of that order is also annexed to the affidavit. In view of this, nothing survives in the Petition. 2. At this stage, the learned Counsel for the petitioner makes a statement that the petitioner would like to challenge the order dated 25.2.2008. For that purpose, the respondents may be directed to maintain status quo for some time. Mr. Kumbhakoni, learned Associate General has no objection to maintain status quo for two weeks. 3. In view of the above, the Contempt Petition stands disposed of without any further action. However, the Respondents shall maintain status quo in respect of the disputed property for a further period of two weeks from this day. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)