1 3 ao 816.10.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION srk APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 816 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1024 OF 2010 Akshay Santosh Raut ..Appellant. v/s. Ravindra Pandey & Ors. ..Respondents. .... Mr. Kunal Cheema i/b Mr. Datta Mane for the Appellant. Mr. Surel S. Shah for the Respondent no.4. .... CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 31ST AUGUST, 2010. P.C. 1 The Appeal is preferred against refusal of ad-interim relief while the Notice of Motion itself is pending. At present no protection is operating in favour of the Plaintiff/Appellant. In view of the facts and circumstances, the following direction will meet the ends of justice: a) The Plaintiff shall give inspection of the documents as required by the Defendants by 4th September, 2010. 2 3 ao 816.10.doc b) The Defendants/Respondents shall file reply to the Notice of Motion within two weeks from this date and the trial court shall hear and dispose of the Notice of Motion within four weeks thereafter. 2 The Appeal from Order stands disposed of accordingly. 3 As the Appeal from Order itself is disposed of, the Civil Application No.1024 of 2010 does not survive and stands disposed of. [ J.H.BHATIA, J. ]