Q @r WWW W WM‘ g/Gf mm £9? ND Og/Og“ E1200 mm (Wu) Wmm ’ r mm f§€rww $sim311é¥r iii: iiUN. §HK1 UlilkhhL .KA NubiiliA d 1 Q ageag Lu PETITION FOR CONTW?T OF HON'EIE CGvRT TINDER ya'rrnr n o 1 a n1 nnnmmwrwrrnw nw rugLA ”‘ a ,;v av.‘ v. mu Sun NR. Vyas, At‘i ate, for 1:116 petitioner. v * sum UtKarsh Verma Adv. for the rgspondent No. 1. snri Rajeev Shrivas va, Adv. for mspondents No. 2 and 3. 1116 instant petition has been flied b‘v the petitioner for aileQed VIOIaUOll 01 U16 01(161‘ datéd f 12 ZUUo DaSSed H1 VV l" NO do5l/ZUUL) fAHH€XUle F-l) Learned counsei r the petitioner submits that representation submitted y the petitioner has been decided bv the contemnors, however i was not decided Within time. k1 o PETiTlONER Smt, nosnan uames W/o arm L1 Uas, aged about 60 ysaxw “5 Rat. 5m NHTsmU D $1613 Memcai wouege Hospliai, Kalpm‘ Vgvgll< uww‘;‘mvm6RS 1. Thri BL. Agrawal Secrsu r, Medicai ‘ F‘djoahnn D.K. ‘ Bhavalli 2. D; Uabktw, U€E31 Ur 5K AmbEdKaI IV! =d1t3al {T011969 Hn¢n1fgl Pn1nur vb” nwrgw, “my ‘3. ‘D1 '. R . R. Tiwari, Jt. Direc‘mr— Supen‘ntendent, D1: ER. Amedkar M€dicai Cullerr6 Hos“ital Rabin“ b l" ’ 1" 4. Dr. Manuraj Pa11d6y, EX. Jt. Dimctor cum S .Lperintandent, Dr. B. R. AmhPr‘ 1m? Iv'udicai Collsge Hospiimi Raipur 21 Kalahoxl Hom’nfgl [év/ WWWW mW (We) man-[m 3941mm Wmm WW 1=$éIW $3im311é$r The respondents 11m and thev have tenaerecl compmng With the order 0: T116 aDOlOEV 15 a0 :epted and the instant contempt DI‘OCCBQH—lgs are (H‘ODPEQ. The petition is accordingiy disposed of. Sdl- Dhirendra Mishra e 2 a? Judge Q9; No. celbS’ v mm E200 re ah‘ead‘y’ flied remy to me peuuon unconditional apology? Ior delay in ”this Court.