IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2603 of 2010 Maya Kumar Sharma, son of Bindeshwar Thakur, resident of Mukhiya Lodge, Mahantha College, Mainpura, P.S.-pataliputra, District-Patna ……………………………………Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar …………………………..Opposite Party. ----------- 3. 01. 04. 2010. In compliance of the order dated 25. 03. 2010, a supplementary affidavit on behalf of the petitioner and a counter affidavit on behalf of Opposite Party No. 2 have been filed stating therein about the compromise arrived at between the parties. Let the same may be kept on record. Heard Mr. Naresh Dikshit, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rajiv Kumar, learned counsel for the informant as also Dr. Indiwar Kumari, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Patliputra P.S. Case No. 118 of 2009, dated 21. 04. 2009, registered under Sections 498 A, 307, 341, 323, 354/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is husband of the informant. Though, effort of compromise made by the learned Sessions Judge while considering the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail made on behalf of the petitioner, had failed, but fortunately, in view of sincere endeavour made by both the counsel representing the petitioner and O.P. No. 2 and in view of willingness of petitioner and O.P. 2, the matter has been amicably sorted out before this Court. The petitioner and O.P.2 are physically present in the Court and they 2 have been duly identified by their respective lawyers. The petitioner and O.P. 2 have also stated before this Court that matrimonial relationship have been restored between the parties. They are willing to live together. In that view of the matter, in terms of compromise, petitioner is directed to take O.P. No.2 along with him to his house and shall keep her and her minor daughter with all dignity and honour. It is expected that O.P. 2 shall also try to have cordial relation with the petitioner. In the aforesaid back ground, the petitioner, namely, Maya Kumar Sharma, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from today, shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with Patliputra P.S. Case No. 118 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. Any of the condition mentioned in the compromise petition filed by the parties, if violated then that may be construed as misuse of privilege of bail. It is hoped that if cordial relationship between the husband and wife continues for some months, then they shall file a compromise petition before the court below regarding the present criminal case. Learned court below shall be obliged to dispose of the case expeditiously in accordance with law. m.p. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)