: 1 : USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APPLICATION NO.1036 OF 2009 IN APPEAL NO.19 OF 2009 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.106 OF 2005 Akkadian Housing & Infrastructural Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. .. Applicants V/s. Pantheon Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. .. Respondents ..... Ms. Farishte Sethna i/by Duttmenon Dunmorr Sett for the Applicants Mr. Rahul Chitnis i/by Federal & Rashmikant for respondent Nos.4,12 and 13. Mr. Mustafa Doctor a/w. Ms. Ankita Singhania i/by Bachubhai Munim & Co. for respondent Nos.2, 6 to 9 and 11. ..... CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 14th OCTOBER 2009. P.C. : 1. The application made today is to vacate the order dated 17th February, 2009 to the extent enabling the Applicants to proceed with the application for speaking to the minutes made before the Company Law Board. It is stated that the Company Law Board cannot proceed with this matter since further proceedings before the Company Law Board are stayed by this Court by the order dated : 2 : 17th February, 2009. 2. Having heard Ms. Sethna and perused the application for speaking to the minutes, I do not see how the order can be modified to enable the Applicants to apply for speaking to the minutes. The order of the Company Law Board is challenged in the Appeal. The Appeal is pending. The very grounds which are raised in the application for speaking to the minutes form part of the grounds to challenge the order of the Company Law Board. In these circumstances, when substantive reliefs are claimed in this Appeal and until this Court directs any clarification on the points raised and grounds urged at the hearing of the Appeal or otherwise, at this stage, it will not be possible to vacate the stay even to the limited extent. The Application for vacating the stay is, therefore, dismissed. Company Application is disposed off accordingly. No order as to costs. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)