1 CR.APL NO.4667/2010 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 13. APPLN/4667/2010 AMOL MOHAN YEDE [Criminal] V/S STATE OF MAH AND ANR -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. G.J.Kore, Adv., for the applicant. Mr.K.M.Suryavanshi, APP for State. Mr.N.C.Garud, Adv., for R.2. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:6/4/2011 1. Heard finally. 2. Grant of bail to respondent No.2 Shahaji Vitthal Pawar by order dt. 24.9.2010 by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad, in Criminal Application No.548/2010, is questioned. Counsel submits, there was suppression before the learned Additional Sessions Judge as rejection of bail application of co-accused was not mentioned and already earlier application was withdrawn. 3. Ground No.M for bail in bail application No.548/2010, informs as 2 CR.APL NO.4667/2010 under: " That, petitioner has filed bail petition No.466/2010 before this Hon'ble Court and said bail petition was not pressed by this petitioner on 18/09/2010 with liberty to file it later on." In the light of this specific assertion, it hardly allow that there was suppression on the part of respondent no.2 Shahaji. The theory of last seen together, carrying the deceased in the agricultural field, need not be dissected at this stage. The three other accused are already released on bail. Chargesheet is filed and the matter is pending before the learned Sessions Judge. 4. In the above situation, I do not see any illegality or perversity on the part of the learned Judge in releasing the accused on bail or there is no suppression on the part of respondent no.2/accused. Application rejected. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/4667-10crapl