1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5360 OF 2009 Kisan Ganpati Javale & Ors. ... Petitioners V/s. M.S. Nigevan & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. P.D. Dalvi for the Petitioners. Mr. S.N. Patil, AGP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 8TH JULY, 2009. P.C.: 1. The learned AGP states that despite having requested respondent No.3 to remain present in the court, pursuant to the oral directions of this court, respondent No.3 has chosen not to remain present. 2. In the circumstances, issue notice to respondent No.3, i.e. Dr. Kishore Toshniwal, why action should not be taken against him. 3. The Petition has been filed against the order passed by respondent No.3 rejecting the application for stay to the appointment of an 2 Administrator to the society known as Kalthan Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahakari Sanstha Maryadeet. 4. In my opinion, the Writ Petition can be disposed of at the stage of admission itself by directing the Administrator who has taken charge of the society to hold elections in accordance with law within two months from today. 5. Mr. Dalvi, learned Advocate for the petitioners, states that with such an order being passed, the petitioners will not press the Appeal which is pending before respondent No.3. This statement of Mr. Dalvi for the petitioners is accepted. 6. Accordingly, the Petition is disposed of by directing the Administrator, i.e. Respondent No. 1 herein, to hold elections to the society within two months from today. .......