: 1 : USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3149 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 2248 OF 2009 Topsar Reality Pvt. Ltd. .. Plaintiff V/s. Indian Express Newspaper Ltd. & Ors. .. Defendants ..... Mr. Janak Dwarkadas, Senior Counsel i/by Federal & Rashmikant for the plaintiff Mr. L.A. Rubens i/by Vigil Juris for defendant Nos.3 and 4. Mr. Vinayak Shete a/w. Poorvi Kamani for defendant Nos.1 and 2. ..... CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 31st AUGUST, 2009. P.C. : 1. It is stated by the Counsel appearing for the parties that consent terms have been arrived at and at their request the suit itself be placed at this stage under the caption "for filing Consent Terms". The plaintiffs are not pressing for any ad-interim reliefs. 2. The consent terms are duly signed by the parties and their advocates. The parties have signed and through their constituted attorneys / authorized persons and it is stated that the agreement which is subject matter of this suit : 2 : stands cancelled by mutual consent and the sums specified in clause 3 would be refunded in the manner specified in clause 4. 3. In these terms, the claim in the suit is settled. Plaintiffs are not pressing for any reliefs. The suit therefore, can be disposed off in terms of the consent terms as they have been arrived after mutual discussions and negotiations. 4. The Consent terms taken on record and marked as "X" for identification. Order in terms of the consent terms. The Suit is disposed off accordingly. Refund of Court fees as per rules. No costs. Notice of Motion does not survive in the light of order in terms of Consent Terms. Undertakings in clauses 5 and 6 are accepted. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)