IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18304 of 2010 DHRUB YADAV, Son of Ramashraya Yadav @ Rameshwar Yadav, resident of Village- Mahdeoganj, P.S. Muffasil, Shahebganj, District- Shahebganj(Jharkhand).................................................Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR.................................................Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 26.05.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 25.01.2010 in a case registered under Sections 392 and 120(B) of the I.P.C. The prosecution case is that the informant’s money, Mobile Sim Cards and some other articles were snatched on the date of occurrence. Subsequently the petitioner’s name sprang up and from petitioner’s possession one Nokia Mobile was seized. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that as per the F.I.R. the alleged snatched Mobile was of China make whereas the recovered Mobile is of Nokia make. Moreover, petitioner was never put on T.I. Parade. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has two other cases which were filed by the agnates of the petitioner in the 2 years 2008 and 2009 in which he is on bail and apart from aforesaid two cases there is no other case against the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, Dhrub Yadav , be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Bhagalpur, in connection with Pirpaintee P.S. Case No. 257 of 2009. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)