,«i •»- ',' <- •t -1 (/'^ ^ ov IN THE HIGH COUMT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BttASPUR WRIT PETITIQ No. ^1^T_/2006 PETITIONER w RAM RATAN DHRUW, S/o. SHRI ' KEJU RAM DHRUW, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, ASSISTANT TEACHER, GOVT. MIDDLE SCHOOL, KANPA, BLOCK MAHASAMUND, R/o. GANGA PARA, TUMGAON, POST TUMGAON, TAHSIL 8s DISTRICT MAHASAMUND (C.G.) RESPONDESTS ,.-1--^-1^ 1) STATE OF THROUGH DEPARTMENT CHHATHSGARH, < SECRETARY, SCHOOL .--r-.v ^. ^" ..^ EDUCATION, DKS BHAVAN, RAIPUR (C.G.) :2) COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF/ TRIBAL WELFARE, RAIPUR (C.G.) :3) THE DIRECTOR, PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, RAIPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER AmTICLES^26/227 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOFINDIA II S1 XI-HC-78 *TTH(^1 ShKT^i S^^IFTRT;]', ^Tflti'lii, Rjcll^y *»»*•*•*.*»^»«l-»l~t* * 1t<I* »* ^ 200 3TT^'?T 4a<*> (>yfd°<<^(T) 3n^T?iTR-fi* (raT3n^TsbHicti ?T(ITWH)?(T3n^T /Wv Assistoht pr^yed 0)1 decislon lt.S.2006 Smt. Hamida Siddique, /tdvoc<jte Shri Satish 6upta, t)y. 6ovt. Heard. By this petition under Ar-ticle petitioner, who is working as Tumgaon, Block Mahasamund, has pay the increments A seniority appointment in the li9ht of the Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No.l452/9|8 of M.P. &others) dated 31.1.2000. The main grievance of the pe| appointed as Assistant Teacher in Department on probation for a However, later on, after completion regularized, but he has not been gi^ situated teachers moved before the for gr-ant of regular pay scale and al.lowed the sarne. The petitioner same treatment, as he is aiso simil^riy respondents have not paid any heed. Thepefore, leorned counsel circumstances, the petitioner be I'espondent No.l for giving the similftr" the so.me poy scale & seniority, whic^i per^iod mdds <t)i<<tci41-i KitinT^'fWt ^srf^iTsn^r for the petitioner. . for the State on advance copy. 226/227 of the Constitution of India the Teacher in 6ovt. Middle School, Kanpo, for a direction to the respondents to the basis of the date of his initial r-endered by the State Administrative (Harish Chand Singh & others Vs. State I'itioner is that vide Annexure P-2 he was the year 1993 in the School Education of two years with the fixed salary. of two yeors tenure, the petitioner was ^en the regular pay scde. Some similarly ptate Administr'ative Tr'ibunal at Jabalpur Ithe Tr'ibunal vide order dated 31.1.2003 several representQtions to accord the situated Assistant Teacher but the •dor the petitioner requested that in the a!lowed to make a repr'esentation to treatment to the petitioner herein and have been sonc4'ioned to other similarly P.T.O. '>.-•• i* XI-HC-78 3^'^IFTRTq', ®Tn'M'l<D,fsKII'My +<1»IWI Sh+licb ^ 200 3IT§??T4a<*> ('i,citd°l<<]3') •OT^T^iTR-ficb (i2(T3n^?Tsh*<iq> / ^ i.93 ,<to STtITW trfStT 3D^T citse situated teachers on account of th4 in turn, he be directed to decide th]i order-s, to which learned counsel foit Having heard leorned couns^l facts and circumstances of the 31.1.2CXX) passed by the State 4 expressing any opinion on the merif make a detailed representation rai^ -aiong with a copy of this petition w| turn, respondent No.l to decide th^ dste of receipt of representotion i|i the points raised by the petitionej 31.1.2000 passed by the Tribunal footings, as the applicants in O.A. same pay scale and seniority. With the direction aforesaidl In vieuv of this order, l.A. N4 Certified copy as per rules. ih °bi<ifci*fl-i *<iHi-iTfftec^<Ri+[ii< ^isri^iTsn^r order of the Tribunal dated 31.1.2000 and i^ representation of the petitioner and pass the State has no objection. for the petitioner, hdving regard to the and having re9ard to the order- dated dministrative Tr'ibunal, Jabalpur, without of the cose, the petitioner" is allowed to ^ing al! the grievances to respondent No.l jthin a period of 10 days from toddy and in ^ same within a period of 30 days from the accordcaice with law after considering all I- and takin9 into account the order dated tand if the petitioner stands on the same t)to.l452/98, then he be also sanctioned the I, the petition stands disposed of. ^.7725/06 also stands disposed of. Sd/- L.< Judge P.T.O. i*