(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 8233 OF 2010 1. Nandkishor s/o. Dagdu Deshmukh, Age : 58 years, Occupation : Service. 2. Ashraf Ali s/o. Asad Ali Khan, Age : 56 years, Occupation : Service. 3. Anita Krishnabaldev Kohali, Age : 47 years, Occupation : Service. 4. Sayyad Shakil s/o. Sayyad Yakub Hakim, Age : 50 years, Occupation : Service. 5. Swati Dilip Akolkar, Age : 46 years, Occupation : Service. 6. Anil s/o. Bhalchandra Badade, Age : 54 years, Occupation : Service. 7. Dipak s/o. Laxman Dhanbhar, Age : 44 years, Occupation : Service. 8. Soloman s/o. Bhaskar Gaikwad, Age : 54 years, Occupation : Service. (2) 9. Kauser Abdul Khalil, Age : 52 years, Occupation : Service. 10. Anand s/o. Laxman Nikam, Age : 54 years, Occupation : Service. 11. Sujata Bhaskar Arole, Age : 43 years, Occupation : Service. 12. Franklin s/o. Joseph Coutinho, Age : 45 years, Occupation : Service. 13. Ranjana Abaji Muley, Age : 48 years, Occupation : Service. 14. Vineet s/o. Vishwanath Gaikwad, Age : 43 years, Occupation : Service. All by occupation Higher Secondary School Teachers, R/o. Bhaskar Pandurang Hiwale Education Societies, The Ahmednagar College, Station Road, Ahmednagar. .. Petitioners. versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through Secretary, Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai. (3) 2. The Director of Education, Maharashtra State, Central Building, Pune. 3. The Dy. Director of Education, Pune Division, 17, Dr. Ambedkar Road, Pune. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. R.R. Karpe, Advocate, holding for Mr. Sandeep S. Deshmukh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. N.B. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos.1, 2 and 3. ........................ CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 7TH OCTOBER 2010 COURT'S ORDER (Per B.R. Gavai, J.) : 1. The limited grievance raised by the petitioners is that the representation of the petitioners, which is pending before respondent no.3, dated 22nd September 2009, in respect of correction in date of acceptance of Three Tier Pay Scale System (TTPSS), be directed to be decided expeditiously. (4) 2. The petition is, therefore, disposed of, with a direction to the respondent no.3, to consider and decide the petitioners' representation dated 22nd September 2009, as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within a period of three months from today. ( A.A. SAYED ) ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp8233