THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.19151 of 2008 Dated:20.10.2010 Between: Vadla Nageshwar .. Petitioners And Sri Y.Venkat Reddy and others .. Respondents ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the 1st respondent in harassing and threatening the petitioner by showing a revolver and interfering with the civil disputes between him and respondents 6 to 8, as illegal and arbitrary and to direct the 9th respondent to take action against the 1st respondent for the illegal acts committed by him. It appears, there are some civil disputes between the petitioner and respondents 6 to 8, which are pending before the civil Court. The petitioner states that the 1st respondent is interfering with the civil disputes between himself and respondents 6 to 8 and threatening him to compromise the matters, and, in this regard, threatened to shoot him by taking out his revolver. There is no necessity to go into all the aspects. A detailed counter affidavit has been filed by the 1st respondent denying the allegations made by the petitioner. It is stated that the 6th respondent filed a complaint on 05.09.2008 against the petitioner and others stating that the 5th respondent purchased the land to an extent of Acs.4.00 situated at the outskirts of Jadcherla in the year 1994 and has been in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the said land and, while so, the petitioner along with others, who are residents of Jadcherla and Kaverammapet Villages, illegally encroached into the said land and dismantled the watchman room, which was under construction and threatened the complainant’s brother by name Tirupathi Reddy and others with dire consequences. The said complaint was registered as Crime No.351 of 2008 on the file of the Jadcherla Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 427 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner and others and investigation was taken up by Probationary DSP, Station House Officer, Jadcherla Police Station. The petitioner herein to prevent the police from taking any action has approached this Court and filed the present writ petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Home for respondents 1 and 9, learned Government Pleader for Revenue for respondents 2 to 5 and Sri K.Sree Ranga Rao, learned counsel appearing for respondents 6 to 8. In the circumstances, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent not to interfere with the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and the respondents 6 to 8. He is further directed not to harass the petitioner by calling him to the Police Station unnecessarily except whenever required as per law. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________ C.V.RAMULU, J 20.10.2010 KH