1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.84 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2957 OF 2005 (VIJAY PUNDLIKRAO GOHOD & 3 OTH. Vs VIDARBHA YOUTH WELFARE SOCIETY & OTH...) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders __________________________________________________________________________________________ ____ Shri Anil S. Kilor, Advocate for Appellants. Shri R.D.Bhuibhar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Shri Rohit Deo, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Shri T.R. Kankale, A.G.P. for Respondent No.3. CORAM : K.J.ROHEE AND R.C.CHAVAN, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 08, 2008. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. It is true that despite interim order dated 03.09.2004 prohibiting the President and the Secretary of the trust not to take up the agenda for inducting new members in the meeting of the executive committee, to be held on 04.09.2004, the meeting was held on 28.02.2005 and as many as five life members were inducted. However, in the final order dated 10.06.2005 the Joint Charity Commissioner observed that the 2 applicants (appellants herein) have not established any illegal procedure or violation of the constitution by the Non-applicants in issuing the agenda for induction of the members. This has been upheld by the learned Single Judge. We find no illegality in the same. There is no substance in the Letters Patent Appeal. Hence, the same is dismissed. 3. It is needless to mention that the appellants are at liberty to take all the grounds available to them in any proceedings under Section 22 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act and while deciding those proceedings the authority concerned shall not be influenced by our observations above. JUDGE JUDGE RR.