..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1900 OF 2008 Abdul Kayyum Selia and 11 Ors. ..Petitioners. Vs. Union Territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli and 2 Ors. ..Respondents. ... Mrs.Recheeta R. Dhuru, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.S.R.Shinde, A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : 14th October, 2008 DATE : 14th October, 2008 DATE : 14th October, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners are seeking quashing of process issued by the learned learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dadra & Haveli at Silvassa in Criminal Case No.16 of 2006. In the said case process is issued under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. ..(2).. 3. The learned Advocate for the petitioners submitted that the learned Magistrate committed an error in issuing process and the said process deserves to be set aside. If the process issued against the petitioners is set aside, the proceedings in respect of the petitioners, would come to an end. 4. However, for the reasons recorded in the order passed by this Court in the case of V.K.Jain Vs. V.K.Jain Vs. V.K.Jain Vs. P.V.Padode; 2005(3) Mh.L.J.778, P.V.Padode; 2005(3) Mh.L.J.778, P.V.Padode; 2005(3) Mh.L.J.778, which has been upheld by the Hon’ble Apex Court I am of the opinion that the petitioners have an efficacious remedy of preferring revision against the order of Magistrate issuing process. Hence, in my view, it would be appropriate that the petitioners prefer a revision before the concerned Sessions Court against the order of the Magistrate issuing process. 5. Liberty is granted to the petitioners to prefer the necessary revision before the concerned Sessions Court. The learned advocate for the petitioners makes a statement that the necessary ..(3).. revision will be preferred within four weeks from today. In view of this statement, the trial Court shall not proceed with the trial for a period of four weeks. 6. On the necessary revision being preferred by the petitioner before the concerned Sessions Court, the concerned Sessions Court shall dispose of the matter on merits after hearing the necessary parties. Delay, if any, in preferring the revision be condoned if revision is preferred within four weeks. 7. Writ Petition is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]