^v^ s^' @ HjGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DiVSSiQN BENCH CORAIVI: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. HON'BLE SHR! SUNIL KUMAR SiNHA, J. Appellant /^«.'»:»»*/» B~* vKSHiiciiii Misc. ADpeal No. 1064 of 2005 Chandan Singh, aged about 26 vears, Son of Shri Teja Aii'as Tejab Sii-yh, resident of - Kargi Raod, Kota, Police Station - Kota, Distt. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS 1 Pradeep Kumar, Son of Narottam Lal, aged abouS 40 years, resident of Gadatrai, P.S. Bazar Chowki, Near Gadatarai, Distt. Dindori W.P. (DRIVER OF ALLEGED TRUCK) 2 Mukesh Kumar, aged about 25 years, Son of Shri Shiv Kumar Sahu, resident of Gadasarai, P.S. Bazar Chowki, Gadasarayee, Distt. Dindori (Madhya Pradesh) (OWNER OF THE ALLEGED TRUC^ {OWNER The Divisional Manager, The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Kigh Court Road, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) (iNSURER OF- THE ALLEGED TRUCK) Memo of Appeai under Section 173 of the Motor Vshicies Act. 1S88 Present : None for the appeilant. Shri Maiay Kumar Bhaduri, tearned counse! for respondents No.1 & 2. Shri P. Dutta, iearned counsel for respondent No.3. ORDER (27th Ju!y, 2008) The foilowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. :'i) 3 ;,' None for the appeltant. 2) As there is no representation on behalf of the appeilant, we are teft with no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. sd/- ChiefJusdce Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge nimmi