IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8364 of 2010 MD.ILTAF ANSARI @ GUDDU, SON OF MD. ABUL HASAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 07/05/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 385 and 387 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the D.R.M., Samastipur Rail Division, received threatening calls from certain Mobile numbers. When the Mobile was traced, it led to one Md. Mustafa who stated that the same was put to use by the present petitioner who had procured it from one Bhola, forcibly showing his wrong documents. However, there is no cogent material to support that in fact, the Mobile was in the use of the petitioner. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 24.12.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, in Samastipur Town P.S. Case No. 767 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other shall be the father of the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is - 2 - implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)