1 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6792/2008 Smt. Vijay Gupta Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. Date of Order :: 2.12.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr Lalit Purohit, for the petitioner/s. Mr Shyam Toshniwal, for the respondents. ... In pursuant to the notification dated 31.3.2008 the petitioner submitted an application to be considered for appointment as Prabodhak in district – Sirohi. However, his candidature was rejected due to deficiency in teaching experience. By this petition for writ the petitioner is claiming for inclusion of the period of training acquired by him after his appointment as para teacher as a part of teaching experience. It is pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioner that from 23.6.2003 to 22.7.2003 he was undergoing required training for para teacher at District Level (Para Teachers Training Center) Abu Road. This Court in the case of Shankar Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCivil Writ Petition No.6766/2008) decided on 15.10.2008 held that the period of training following the appointment of para teacher is required to be treated as part of teaching experience as defined under Rule 2(k) of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Prabodhak Service Rules, 2008. In view of it, the period commencing from 23.6.2008 to 22.7.2008 is also required to be treated as part of teaching experience acquired by the petitioner. 2 Accordingly, this petition for writ is allowed. The respondents are directed to consider candidature of the petitioner for the purpose of appointment to the post of Prabodhak in district – Sirohi and appointment be accorded to him if she stands in merit and is otherwise eligible for appointment on the post concerned. No order as to costs. (GOVIND MATHUR), J. Jgoyal '