((-1-)) hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2945 OF 2006 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 234 OF 2007 Shankar Vishnu Nerkar and Anr. ... Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors.. Respondents Ms. Shilpa with Mr.M.B. Gawade for Petitioners. Mr. C.R. Sonawsane, A.G.P. for R. Nos. 1 to 4. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & S.J. VAZIFDAR,JJ. S.J. VAZIFDAR,JJ. S.J. VAZIFDAR,JJ. DATED: FEBRUARY 09, 2007 DATED: FEBRUARY 09, 2007 DATED: FEBRUARY 09, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The learned counsel prays that the matter be kept back. We have gone through the Petition and do not find this to be a fit case for adjournment. . The main grievance of the Petitioner is that for the area of 0.25 R, an Award came to be passed without issuig notice under Section 9(3) of the Land Acquisition Act. The award was passed on 31.1.1995. The Petitioner has approached this court in the year 2006. The remedy for the petitioner in the event there was non compliance on the ground that market value has not been properly valued, was to pursue remedy under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. ((-2-)) . Considering the above, in our opinion, this is not a fit case for this court to exercise our extra ordinary jurisdiction. Petition along with Civil Application disposed of. No order as to costs. (S.J. VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J. VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J. VAZIFDAR,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)