IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CRIMINAL REVISION NO.9 OF 2005 Riyaz Ahmad S/o Karamat Ullah Khan, R/o Muslim Colony Near Kabristan, Vill. Laksar, P.S. Laksar, Distt. Hardwar ……… Revisionist Versus Addl. Family Judge, Family Court, Hardwar & another ……Respondents Sri Navneet Kaushik, ld. counsel for revisionist Sri Bhuvnesh Joshi, Adv. i/b Sri Vivek Shukla, ld. counsel for respondent no.2 Dated: July 09, 2008 HON. DHARAM VEER, J. This criminal revision, preferred under Section 397/401 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter to be referred as Cr.P.C.), is directed against the judgment and order dated 24.12.2004 passed by Additional Family Judge, Roorkee (Hardwar) in Misc. Case No.16 of 2003, Durdana Jari Vs. Riyaz Ahmad. 2. Sri Navneet Kaushik, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Bhuvnesh Joshi, Advocate holding brief of Sri Vivek Shukla, learned counsel for Respondent No.2, are present. 3. Learned counsel for both the parties have jointly submitted before the Court that both the parties have entered into compromise and they are living with each other amicably. It was further submitted that due to this reason, the present revision has been rendered infructuous and may be dismissed as such. 4. In view of the above-said joint agreement between the learned counsel for both the parties, the revision is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order dated 19.1.2005 stands vacated automatically. (Dharam Veer, J.) 09.07.2008 Rajeev Dang