1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3551 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – TDS, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus Colgate Palmolive (India) Limited ..Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant. Mr.Dinesh Vyas with Mr.Ajit Shah and Mr.Rajiv Singh i/by Chitnis & Co., for the respondent. CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ. DATE : 5 May 2010. P.C. : 1. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue and the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the assessee are agreed in stating that the issues which are sought to be raised in this appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Revenue, are covered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee by the judgment of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited (Income Tax Appeal No.2256 of 2009) decided on 12 March 2010. 2. In view of the statement made, no substantial question of law would arise. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)