XI-HG—7S ^ ^Sf •<ll'41Cl^, Slflly'Ko, fs|MI-Hll< ani?! 'q^r (•^3^;) ail^i T;\~ai7iN>' ^SH 3TT^T sft*i|cfi "reiRR ^Ti 3TK?I CSinqle Behch; l-lon'l|>le Mr. Justice bhirendra Mishra) W.P. [s PETITIONER R.D. S(| aged Vs RESPQNDENTS Quart^r No.6-5, bhamtari, District bhamtari (C6) 1. Stajte of Chhattisgarh, through- the Se^retary, Water Resources Department, D.Kl Disi Present: Mr. Saleem Kazi, Advocate for Mr. Y.S. Thakur, Deputy Advoca ^rafeflTWWff <f fe^ Tf^R?H ^STfiCTSIRSi No. 6431/200^ (Petition U/A 226/^27 of Constitution of India) iri, S/o Late Shri Buddhu Ram Sori, bout 49 years, R/o Sichai Golony, S. Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur. 2. Se4retary, Panchayat ond Sramin Vikas Vib|iag, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur, District Raibur. Joi^it Secretary, Panchayat and Sramin Vik^is Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur, rict Raipur (C6) t|ie petitioner. [•e General for the State. 16.10.2008 The instant petition is dirjected of Annexure P-2 whereby the| deputation in the Depgrtment against the or-der dated 14.09.2006 petitioner, who was already working on |)f Panchayat and Rural, Raipur, has been r i ^asy" 'f ^ 'vsst^'.f XI-HG—78 STI^lVtT'fN? WTSll^ignfe ^s '3^ -1)1<41('1<1, ®t)l<H'l<o,i»idl-Llti< sf^v -^w C'pis^ET) - 2- , ^ratesftii-'wraf'cr'fe'stTRreaT ^ arfro sii^si further posted on deputation in| submits that the State has no the Water Management Division, Rudri, District Dhamtari. Mr. Thakur, learned Det>uty Advocate General for the State objection if the order of Annexure P-2 dated 14.9.2006, so far it relate^ to the petitioner, is quashed. In view of above submis|sion, the order of Annexure P-2 dated 14.9.2006, so far it relates to j^he petitioner herein, is hereby quashed. However, it shall be open to the State to pass any orderln relation to the _ petitioner's services under admiijiistrative exigencies. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge