1 Cri.A.4530.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4530 OF 2010 [The State of Maharashtra Vs. Sultana @ Jarina Rafiq shah ] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri.V.G.Shelke,APP for applicant-State. Shri.P.R.Adkine,Advocate for respondents. .... CORAM: SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATE : 18TH APRIL, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Mr. Adkine, learned counsel submits that he shall file Vakalatnama for respondents in the office during a course of day. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. This is an application preferred by the applicant (Original Complainant) for condonation of delay of 11 days caused in filing Criminal Appeal. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents opposed the present application vehemently. 2 Cri.A.4530.10 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders 5. For the reasons stated in the present application, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily. It also appears that the said delay is not willful, deliberate and intentional, and hence, same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 6. In the result, present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ and delay of 11 days, caused in filing Criminal Appeal stands condoned, and present application stands disposed of accordingly. Sd/- [SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J.] MTK