6^^ C50 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARHAT BILASPUR W.F(£')KG._5"^ '"7 /2GOS PETITIONERS ^. JS Ay ^/ ^2^l/ w:^/ z:y/ ^''.- .<&' ^co^ -r^r -^D-'^ B^0' c^^ [o RESPONDENTS 7. Asha Ram Sahu, aged about 52 years,/^ S/o.Guhan Das, R/o. Village & Post Bana Tehsil Arang, R/o. District Raipur (C.G.) Gautam Sahu, S/o. Bisru Sahu, R/o^ Village 8s Post Banarasi, Tehsil Arang, District Raipur(C.G.) Pardesi Ram Sahu, S/o. Johan Sahu,/ Village Ranisagar, Post Banarasi, District Raipur (C.G.) Dhan Singh Verma, S/o. Pardesi Ram,'' R/o. Village Dhivra, Post Kharora, Tehsil Tilda, District Raipur (C.G.) Ramavatar Sahu, S/o. BhuKhau, R/o. ^ Village & Post Banarasi, Tehsil Arang District Raipur (C.G.) Chhedi Viswakarma, S/o. Sukhdeo, R/o./ Vill.Ss Post Banarasi, Tehsil Arang, District Raipur (C.G.) Chait Ram Sahu, S/o. Sewak, R/o. Village^ 8s Post Banarasi, Tehsil Arang, District RaipurfC.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, ' Through Secretary, Public Works Department, MantBalaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, PAipur (C.G.) ^. F>—-^.-".-1''*-!\7.=>T-T-: ^ , -;S 'vs \ Executive E;ngmeer,.. Division No.-Ol, Public Works Department, Raipur (C.G.) Sub Divisional Officer, Sub Division No. 4, Engineering College, Raipur, District Raipur(C.G.) WRIT PETITIQNER UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFj[NmAJX!RJSSUA^E^>£A^RW^JmE NATUREOF^ANDSl^.lpROHIBITION, CERTIORARI^C^OR ANY OTHER DiRECnONJOR^ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER HI6H COMT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S) No. 5417 of 2006 Petitioners : Asha Ram Sojiu and others Versus Respondents ; State of Chhatt'isgarh and others SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J Shri Sunil Otwani, Advocote for the petitioners. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy 6ovt. Advocate for the respondents/State. -^.K OR DER (passed on this 8th day of February, 2007) 1. Leomed counset appearing for the petitioners ajbmits that the petitioners do not press prayer No. 7.1 and 1.2. 2. Leamed counsei appearing for the petitioners as well as feamed Deputy Sovernment Advocate appearing for the reqiondents/State jointly submit that the facts of -the present case are similar to that of in W. P. No. 454/2005 (Ram Prasad Yadav & others vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others), which was allowed vide order dated 4.1.2007. They furttier submit that the question of law involved is also the sasme. 3. In view of the above stcted submissions made by leamed counsel for the parties, the writ petition is allowsd of in terms of the order dated 4.1.2007 passed by this Court in W. P. No. 454/2005. No order as to costs. Thakur Sd/- Satish KAgnihotri Judge