Civil Revision No. 6174 of 2007 -1- *** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6174 of 2007 Date of decision: 29.11.2007 Ranjit Kaur and others ...Petitioners Versus Hardev Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Parveen K. Kataria, Advocate for the petitioners. **** RAJESH BINDAL, J. The challenge in the present petition is to the order dated November 3, 2007 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Taran Taran whereby evidence of the petitioners/defendants No. 5 to 7 has been closed in a suit filed against them for permanent injunction. For the view I am taking in the present petition, I do not deem it appropriate to issue notice to respondent No.1/plaintiff as the same would unnecessarily delay not only disposal of the present petition but the suit as well. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that after the closure of the evidence of the respondent No. 1/plaintiff, three opportunities in a very short span of one month i.e. 3.10.2007, 15.10.2007 and 3.11.2007 were granted to the petitioners/defendant no. 5 to 7 to lead their evidence, however, for the reasons beyond their control, the same could not be completed. He submitted that in case one opportunity is granted to them, they will produce their entire evidence on the date already fixed by the trial Court i.e. December 04, 2007. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners, I find merit in the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners/defendant No. 5 to 7. Keeping in view interest of justice I grant one opportunity to the petitioners/defendants No. 5 to 7 for producing their entire evidence on the Civil Revision No. 6174 of 2007 -2- *** date already fixed by the trial Court i.e. December 04, 2007, which is stated to be fixed for the evidence of defendants no. 8 and 9. However, the same shall be subject to payment of Rs. 2000/- as costs to the plaintiff/respondent No. 1. The Petitioners/defendants No. 5 to 7 will be at liberty to take the help of the Court to summon the witnesses. The revision petition is disposed of in the manner indicated above. November 29, 2007 (Rajesh Bindal) Pka Judge