1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 4105/2005 (Smt. Jamnadevi Lakhotia Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.) Date of Order : 01/03/2007 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. Sanjeet Purohit for the petitioner. Mr. Rameshwar Dave, Dy. G.A. for the respondents. BY THE COURT:- Though the writ petition has been admitted, however, learned Deputy Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submits that the writ petition has become infructuous for the reason that the services of the petitioner were terminated vide order dated 8.11.2004 Annex.R-19 and the writ petition was filed on 12.7.2005 much after the termination of the services without assailing the order of termination. The petitioner has prayed in the writ petition that the order dated 21.8.2004 directing the petitioner to hand over 2 the charge of Anganwari Centre, Amlikalan may kindly be quashed and set aside. Since the petitioner's services have been terminated, the order directing to hand over the charge cannot be quashed. In this view of the matter, I do not find any merit in the writ petition. The writ petition is therefore, dismissed. However, it is open for the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition if he is aggrieved by the order of termination. Stay petition also stands dismissed. No order as to costs. (H.R.PANWAR),J. rp