IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 1336 of 2011 a/w CWP Nos. 1366 & 1390 of 2011 Decided on: March 21, 2011. 1. CWP No. 1336 of 20111 Sanjay Kumar . vs. State of H.P. & ors. 2. CWP No. 1366 of 2011 Dutt Ram vs. State of H.P. & ors. 3. CWP No. 1390 of 2011 Joginder Singh vs. State of H.P. & ors. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner(s) : Mr. A. K. Gupta, Advocate For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A. G. & Mr. J. K. Verma, Dy. A. G. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim work charge status, arrears, seniority and other consequential benefits from the date they completed eight years of service. Reliance is placed on the decision of this Court dated 28th July, 2010 rendered in CWP No. 2735 of 2010, titled as Rakesh Kumar versus State of H.P. and others. 2. Learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. Petitioners submit that they would file appropriate representation(s) furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from 2 today. It is always open for them to do so. As and when the same is made the second respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, in light also of the decision referred to above within a period of another four months. The petitioners will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the judgment referred to in this judgment while submitting the representation(s). 3. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending application(s) if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice March 21, 2011 ( Justice Sanjay Karol ), (rana/pankaj) Judge.