1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24/06/2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN Writ Petition (MD) No.6616 of 2011 S.Vellaidurai ... Petitioner Vs The District Manager, Office of the District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd. Ambasamudram Road, Muneerpallam, Palayamkottai Taluk, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli district. ... Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the entire records relating to the impugned tender notification dated 15.06.2011 issued by the respondent in Na.Ka.No.Aa1/1500/2011 and published the same in the Tamil Daily Dinakaran dated 18.06.2011 and quash the same in so far as the bar attached with the TASMAC shop No.10648 situate in the Palayamkottai Municipal Building, near Palayamkottai Bus stand, Palayamkottai Region, Tirunelveli District is concerned and consequently direct the respondent to extend the period of license for further one year from 01.07.2011 to 30.06.2012 for collecting empty bottles and to sell eatables in the said TASMAC Shop No.10648 on payment of 10% increase of tender amount than the present existing tender amount in view of the reasons that the period of license granted to the petitioner by the respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.A2/34/2010 dated Nil.06.2010, which comes to an end on 30.06.2011. For petitioner ...Mr.A.Saravanan For Respondents ...Mr.K.Mahendran Spl. Govt. Pleader ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. 2. By consent, the Writ petition is taken up for final hearing. 3. Challenging the impugned notification dated 15.06.2011 of the respondent, the petitioner has come up with the present writ petition. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4. The petitioner, instead of taking part in the auction, has approached this Court challenging the said notification on the ground that he sought for extension of the lease and this Court had directed the respondent to consider the same and hence, according to him, the respondent may not be justified in issuing the tender notification. 5. However, I am unable to accede to the said contention of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner for the reason that the lease period was already over and the petitioner, if at all interested, has to take part in the auction pursuant to the tender notification. 6. Taking such view, the present writ petition stands dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to take part in the auction. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(C.O.) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To The District Manager, Office of the District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd. Ambasamudram Road,Muneerpallam, Palayamkottai Taluk, Tirunelveli. Tirunelveli district. RR akm/27.06.11 /2p-2c/ W.P.(MD) No.6616 of 2011 24.06.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/