HIGH GOURT OF GHHATTISGARH OT BILASPU DIVISIONBENCH j'Bl-E SHRIIRftJEEV GUPTA.GJ. HQN'BI-ESHR!SUNII-KUMARSINHA,J. WritADpeal (PRl No. 3210 of 2010 ^/! 39^/'0 (Petitioner Below) Respondents below) Anup Ram Sahu, SA> Shri Netram Sahu, aged about 29 years, R/o. ViVage Bhotideeh, Post Nipania, Tahsil Bhatapara District Raipyr (C.Q.) 1. 2. 3. StateofehhattisgarhAhroughthe Secretary,;DepartmeRt; of l-lQm8, DI,K,S,Bhawan, Mantralaya,tF?aipur Director Qeneral,.Police Head Quarter, Chhattisgarh Raipur(C.G.) lnspectorQeneral,PoliceHead Quarter,Chhattisgarh,Raipyr(C.G.) SuperintendentofPoliGe, Raipur aRpeal underSection2ofSub-Sectionf1l6fthe ChhattisaarhHiahCourt{ADDeaitoDivisi6nBenchtAc{.2007 Present: Shri Varun Sharma, learned counsel/fQrthe appellant. Shri Kishore Bhadurj, leamed Additional Advocate ©eneralfor the State/ respondents N6.1 to 4. w JUDGMENT (29thOCtober,2010) The following judgment of'the Court was passed by Gupta,'C.J^,,..;::,' '" •.• .;,:::':. ;: -.'' ' •1::::: : :'.:.' Learnedttounselforthepartiesareheanj. a.'.! n. ^.r^is'^ »f : "', %;yK3^^ ;ltslt !B?aiN .iiil 2) The appellant has filed this writ appeal against the impugned order dated 06-05-2010, passed in W.P.(S) No.4580/2009. 3) The appeilant/ j>etitioner, in the writ petitton was seeking a directionto the respondents toconsider him for appointment to the post of Constable and further to quash the selection process initiated by the respondents/ State Authorities in pursuance to the advertisement dated 09-06-2009 for recruitment t6 the post of Constables. ; 4) The petitioner's entire elaim was based on his inclusion in the waiting list publishied;on 13-08-20D8. Theappellant's/petitioner's main grievance was that the respondents/ State Authoritieswithout exhausting thewaiting list prepared in the year 2008 have injtiated the selection proc6ss in the year 2009 vide advertisement dated 09-06-2009. • •<,- ;: / : : . ' 5) Learned Single Judge on a thorough cpnsideration of the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner and the provisions contained in Rule 13 of Chhattisgarh Poliee Executive Foree, Constable (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2007 ((for short 'the Rules, 2007) founy nosubstance in the petitioner'sclaim. Leamed Single Judge.therefore, dismissed the writ petition vide irHpugned order dated 06-05-2010. .->?. • • • • • . '' . ' ' 6) Shri Varun Sharma, learned counsel for the appellant vehemenfly argued that the leamed Single Judge has erred in not •SSSSS^SSS.Sc.'i'-^ : • ^ ^ ^ feig^^ !!«!]! lli.li (IKU •UOQQ^Q }UM SAUBtiadde 8qi6u!ss!Lus!pa6pnr9|6utspauje9|QyiAq pessedj3pjo-p8u6ndu.li a^uiAiiiujyu! Aue pui^iou op3 'jsueuueiitjo MSjAsiq} u| (g v' '600Z-90-60 PS P tuscU9Si)J3ApB epjA 6002 jesA sy^ ui sssoojd uoiiosiss AASU 341 p uojteitiu! SL]I q}]M pus ue / .• •-. o^ siueo 800Z-90-SI. uo p3i)si|qnd pue gOOSJesA SL|I ui'psjedsjd }St|,pa|3S 3L|} teqi }qnop jcy LUOCU Aue 9AB8| }ou ssop jspjo peuSnduj! SL|t io ^\, ejed ui pspnb ^OOZ S3|ny p £j, ainy (9 •ssitijoyinv 8}Ets /s)U3puodss3 eij} Aq epeuj yssq 8AB4 0} p36a]|e si }U9LU}uiodde qons ou sseo tussejd ey} U! 'Alpeyicupv 'peiuiodde S! tsi] SuillBAATtSII 108|9S SL|t Ul UUIL| MO|eq uosjsd e usqM At!|en)U8A8 aqi ui A|yo4Si| BuiijBAA fls!|i39|9saL)} ui eiepipueo sij} jo jnoAej u\ p3fe3.io si %6u e Liong •snujepueui ^o }\ith )|89s 01 wBu |B63| QU seq }si| 6U!t!B 7ls!i }os|es 3l)t u]8)epipueo e4B4tMB| psinss si t| Cl •S3|ny si|} ui psquossjdsB 'A|n[*jo L^IUOLUJO peeisuisunr.to q)uoui sqi ui sseoojd UO!PS|SS AASU ey} 6u!te!i|U! jo^ pue SOOZ -IBS^ SMI ui pajedsjd isi| SUIIIBM su^ Suitsneyxs tou joj uosesj Aue psuBisse 4ou 3AE4 ss^yoytnv siBtS /siuspuodssj SLJ} pue 'SQOZ -iBeA sqt uisssoojd tuaLuiimosj MSU 3t|i.^o uo!}Bi}tU] Sjojsq IUBOBA ueiie^ peq 43tL)M isod ai)} }suiB6B }si| BUBJBM syi U! SBM oqM iue||8ddB 8L|t psiyiodde 8AB4 o^ iqBno sajtyoqtnv 3tB}S /Stuspuodssj BLI) 'psiuiodde 8J9M }si| BuitiBM 34} LUOJJ S8}ep!pueo 'LijeBsineyiio jo aieis S41 ui spuisip J34}o SLUOS U! }BL|} pel 84}0} iqBism enp BUJAIB fs ^s'^s H ''WKSsf. ^sr"" 't^T <^ g; ••^^"^y 10) Thewrit appeal, therefore, is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed summarily on merits notwithstanding that it is barred bv time. Sd/- ' Chief Jusdce .L. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge subbu '.•