IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 27268 of 2008 Between: K.David Raju S/o.Ratnam Government Polytechnic, Ongole, Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Chief Secretary, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Technical Education, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 The Regional Joint Director of Technical Education, Tirupati. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records from the Tribunal and quash the memo No. F1-3/1030/2008-Zone-II dt. 26.09.2008 by declaring the action of the respondents in not fixing petitioner seniority from 5.4.1989 as illegal, arbitrary, erroneous and violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to fix petitioner seniority from 05.04.1989 in Zone II and pay consequential benefits I am entitled to and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.K.KISHORE REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 27268 of 2008 ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) This Writ Petition is filed by the applicant in O.A.No.9117 of 2008, on the file of the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (for short ‘Tribunal’). Since the Tribunal had admitted the O.A. on 10-11-2008 and is pending adjudication before the Tribunal, we are not inclined to entertain this writ petition at this stage. As on this day, there is no order of the Tribunal, legality of which could be tested before this Court by way of judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Tribunal in its discretion though it appropriate to issue notice to the respondents and hear them before it considers the question of granting interim relief to the petitioner. No exception can be taken to such a course of action on the part of the Tribunal. It is suffice to direct the Tribunal to dispose of the O.A., as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed at the admission stage. ________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED,J ____________________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY,J Dt:16-12-2008 Note:Furnish copy within two days bo usd