IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 21766 of 2010 Date of Decision: 7.12.2010. Prakash Chandra --Petitioner Versus H.U.D.A. & others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Hemant Bassi, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. Ajay Nara, Advocate present in the Court has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. The petitioner was allotted Plot No. 119-P, Sector 31-32, Gurgaon under the discretionary quota of the Chief Minister. The said allotment was, however, challenged before this Court and the same was set aside vide judgement dated 23.3.1997. The decision of this Court, however, became subject matter of challenge before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court decided the controversy while issuing certain directions in case of Harish Dhingra Vs. State of Haryana reported as 2000 (9) SCC 550. The claim of the petitioner is that he is entitled to the restoration of the plot, the same having been allotted before the cut off date as per the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The petitioner having not been given the possession, filed a writ petition before the Hon'ble CWP. No. 21766 of 2010 -2- Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution. This petition was allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to approach the High Court as is evident from the order dated 1.10.2010 passed in CWP (Civil) No. 308 of 2010 (Annexure P-21). As a consequence of the aforesaid order the present petition has been filed before this Court. Petitioner made various representations, copies of such representations have been placed on record as Annexures P-17, P-18 & P-20 but no decision has been taken thereon till date. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if, respondents are directed to take decision on the representations made by the petitioner, referred to above. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.1 to take decision on the representations made by the petitioner in the light of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, referred to above, within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said respondent. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 7.12.2010. lucky