:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4325 OF 2003 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4325 OF 2003 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4325 OF 2003 IN IN IN CROSS OBJECTION NO. 229 OF 1987 CROSS OBJECTION NO. 229 OF 1987 CROSS OBJECTION NO. 229 OF 1987 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 465 OF 1986 FIRST APPEAL NO. 465 OF 1986 FIRST APPEAL NO. 465 OF 1986 Chagan Shankar Sargule ..Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr. N. V. Walawalkar for the Applicant. Mr. K. K. Tated A.G.P. for the Respondents. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. DATE : 3RD FEBRUARY,2005 DATE : 3RD FEBRUARY,2005 DATE : 3RD FEBRUARY,2005 P.C. (IN CHAMBER) : P.C. (IN CHAMBER) : P.C. (IN CHAMBER) : 1. The matter is on board for speaking to the Minutes of my Order dated 13.1.2005. Mr. Walawalkar Counsel for the Applicant and Mr. Tated, learned AGP for the State present. 2. While passing the said order the interest rate was reduced to 6% per annum on the basis of the :2: Judgment of the Supreme Court reported in 2000(7)SCC 2000(7)SCC 2000(7)SCC 756 Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti vs. Kanhaiya Lal 756 Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti vs. Kanhaiya Lal 756 Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti vs. Kanhaiya Lal and others. and others. and others. Mr. Walawalkar pointed out that the judgment is not applicable as the award is subsequent to the amendment i.e. dated 28.2.1985. Mr. Tated does not dispute this position. Therefore, order dated 13.1.2005 stands modified. The interest claimed at the rate of 9% per annum is awarded as per the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act. Order stands correctly accordingly. 3. Parties to act on an ordinary copy of this order duly authenticated by the Court Sheristedar. 3.2.2005 (D.G. DESHPANDE,J.)