IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 16981 of 2001 Between: C.Satyanarayana, S/o.Late Mallaiah, R/o.10-4-A/315, Corresponding to Plot NO.D-236, Addagutta, East Marredpally, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Hyderabad. 2 Revenue Divisional Officer, Begumpet, Secunderabad, Hyderabad District. 3 Mandal Revenue Officer, East Marredpally, Secunderabad, Hyderabad District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondnets in locking the Petitioner's house bearing Muncipial No.10-4-A/315 corresponding to Plot No.D-236, situated at Addagutta, East Marredpally, Secunderabad, in the absence of the petitioner as illegal arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to handover the key to the petitioner forthwith, and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.G.M.RAVI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO. 16981 OF 2001 ORDER: Since none appeared for the petitioners on 5.11.2008, the writ petition was directed to be posted “for dismissal”. Today though the writ petition is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, neither is the counsel for the petitioner present nor is there any representation on his behalf. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as costs. _____________ 14-11-2008 asp