IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.891 of 2009 DINESH SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 6. 22.7.2010 We have heard counsel for the parties. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the state also. The allegations are primarily against respondent no. 6 vis-à-vis the daughter of the petitioner. Since a police case has already been lodged by the petitioner, we do not consider it proper to take note of the facts except to the extent necessary for the present order so as not to affect the investigation in the police case. In view of the fact that the petitioner has himself allowed the writ petition to be dismissed against respondent no. 6 by non-compliance of the orders of this Court for issuance of notice to him, we are not satisfied that this matter is fit for interference in the extraordinary writ jurisdiction of Habeas Corpus. We, therefore, dispose off this application with the observation that if a police 2 case has been lodged, naturally the police is required to statutorily investigate and submit the report before the appropriate Court. The application is disposed off. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.) (Jyoti Saran, J.)