IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36611 of 2009 1. Pramod Kumar Singh, Son of Sheo Narain Singh. 2. Shambhu Singh, Son of Prameshwar Singh. 3. Vikki Singh, Son of Jai Prakash Singh. 4. Rinku Singh, Son of Satya Parkash Singh. 5. Chunnu Singh, Son of Pramod Singh. 6. Purushottam Pandey, Son of Late Dina Nath Pandey. 7. Manoj Singh, Son of Late Sheo Mangal Singh. All above residents of village-Jaitpur, P.S.-Daudpur, District-Saran. ..............Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR. ...............Opp. Party. ----------- 2/ 07.12.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioners and the State. Counsel for the petitioners is permitted to provide father’s name of petitioner No. 6, Purushottam Pandey. F.I.R. has been instituted by the sitting Mukhiya, making allegation of demand of rangdari and assault by the petitioners. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the informant was earlier defeated by father of petitioner No. 3 and also by petitioner No. 1 in election of Panchayat Samiti, Jaitpur, Because of political rivalry false case has been instituted by previous grudge. It is also stated that injury report has been manufactured and for that, injury report has been manufactured by the Mukhiya. No such injury has been caused by the petitioners. It is also stated that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Considering these facts, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of above named petitioners is allowed. They are directed to be released on bail, in case of their appearance 2 before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran (Chapra) in connection with Daudpur P.S. Case No. 18 of 2009 subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. Sanjeet/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)