IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 1367 of 2009 Between: 1 Smt.Farzana Begum D/o.Syed Yousufuddin R/o.18-12-418/A/99, Hafeezbabanagar, Hyderabad. 2 Mrs. Rizwana Begum D/o.Syed Yousufuddin R/o.2-93/7/A, Tarnagar, Lingampally, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad. 2 The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad. 3 The Station House Officer, Pahadi Shareef P.S., Cyberabad. 4 Abdul Sattar Khan S/o.Abdul Gaffar Khan R/o.19-3-1077/A/65, Sarfarazjung Colony, Jahanuma, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue writ or direction particularly in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 3, particularly 3rd respondent in adjudicating the title and possession of the petitioners over the property in plot bearing No. 125/A, in Sy.No. 156/E admeasuring 300 sy.yards situated at Balapur village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District for providing protection to the petitioner from the 4th respondent in spite of the injunction order in I.A.No.3115 of 2008 in O.S.No.1235 of 2008, dated 6.11.2008 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, R.R. District at L.B.Nagar, as illegal, void, without power and jurisdiction, and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.R.AVULA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 1367 of 2009 ORDER: 1 The petitioners approached this court and filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is prayed that this Hon’ble court may be pleased to issue writ or direction particularly in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 3, particularly 3rd respondent in adjudicating the title and possession of the petitioners over the property in plot bearing No. 125/A, in Sy.No. 156/E admeasuring 300 sy.yards situated at Balapur village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District for providing protection to the petitioner from the 4th respondent in spite of the injunction order in I.A.No.3115 of 2008 in O.S.No.1235 of 2008, dated 6.11.2008 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, R.R. District at L.B.Nagar, as illegal, void, without power and jurisdiction, and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. “ 2 This court by order dated 15.4.2009 observed as follows: “…….. Counter affidavit is filed by the 3rd respondent, Inspector of Police, Pahadi Shareef Police Station Cyberabad Commissionerate. But the allegation in the Writ Petition is that the 2nd respondent – Assistant Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad has made an endorsement on the representation of the petitioner directing the subordinates to call both the parties and try to settle the issue amicably, which indicates that the police are interfering in the civil matter.” 3 Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader produced copy of the proceedings in RC.No.1424/Legis-1/2009, Dated 07.08.2009 whereby disciplinary action has been initiated against the second respondent herein for interfering in the civil dispute and also the guidelines i.e. Memorandum dated 30.07.2009 detailing the method of handling civil disputes being issued by the office of the Director General of Police. 4 In the light of the said guidelines issued by the office of the Director General of Police and also initiation of disciplinary action against the second respondent for his interference in civil disputes, this court is of the view that no further orders need be passed in this Writ Petition. Accordingly this Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. ---------------- 18.08.2009 kvsn