IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 10787 of 2008. Decided on: 22nd December, 2010. Mohinder Singh. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner is seeking conferment of work charge status. Mr. P.M. Negi, learned Deputy Advocate General has drawn the attention of the Court to Annexure R-1, i.e., Mandays-Chart of the petitioner. A bare perusal of this Chart makes it abundantly clear that the petitioner had continuously worked w.e.f. 1996 and had completed 240 days in each calendar year. 2. Mr. Onkar Jairath, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client is still working and had already completed 10 years’ continuous service with 240 days in each calendar year. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of petitioner for conferment of work charge status/regularization, if he had 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 - completed 10 years’ continuous service with 240 days in each calendar year, with all consequential benefits, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 22, 2010. (bhupender) - 3 -