: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.3575 of 1990 SUIT NO.3575 of 1990 SUIT NO.3575 of 1990 Heliplastics Limited .. Plaintiffs. Versus Parth Sarthy Srinivasan Pillai .. Defendants. Mr.V.R.Hombalkar i/b.Dhruv L. & Asso. for plaintiffs. None for the defendants. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATE : 10th September, 2008. DATE : 10th September, 2008. DATE : 10th September, 2008. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. Learned Advocate for the plaintiffs states that the Attorneys are unable to trace the responsible officer of the plaintiffs company and that no employee or responsible officer of the company has contacted the Attorneys of the plaintiffs for a substantially long time. On 10.7.2008 issues were framed. Evidence affidavit was ordered to be placed before the court today. That has not been done, apparently on the ground that the plaintiffs are not contacting the Advocate for the plaintiffs. The fact that the plaintiffs have not contacted the learned Attorneys of the plaintiffs goes to show that they are not interested in prosecuting the suit. 2. Suit is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. : 2 : (R.Y. GANOO,J.) (R.Y. GANOO,J.) (R.Y. GANOO,J.)