HIGH COURT OF CMMAmSGARHArBHLASPUR ^WHT pmflbN(Sl .323SM2007 PETITiONER RESPONDENTS Devendra Singh Thakur, S/o Shri Malik Ram Thatair, aged about 55 yeais, R/o Salka Navagaon, Kota, Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, EducaUon Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director of Public Penstonbada, Raipur (C.G.) In^ruction, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE COt^TITUTION OF INDIA SmgleBench : Hon'ble Mr. JusUce Satlsh K. Agnihotri Present: Mr. Kumarssh Tiwari, Advocate for the petUfoner. Mr. Anrind Dubey, Panel !aswyer for the respondCTts/Stete. ORDER 0'assed on 13" day of June,2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner as wett as for the State/respondents jotntly submit that the fact and questiwi of law invoh/ed in the present writ petffion are <he same to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal CorporaUon, Durg and another {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}, which has been disposed of vlde order dated 03.04.2006. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents does not controvert the said submission. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of Uie order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verificadon ofthe fact as to whether the petitroner has acquired B.Ed. Examinatton Certiflcate on his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.19^ and further whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. B/- Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge r