tWfs ir^qygff gTTraft?) 'sfwfaT, rrqg:?' IDO yo^ 3Tro?o?frar • K «^» 999 %-T FfT03Tr?o^i' 3f r^-? gt 3fto3Trroq!q?' j? 50 cN', faairagTs ftrgrr 3ffE-prrT Tsn^r, fsmr TT^T 1109-0 — ft ?; & i^[^^^. |i| ifE-qy'gTr TTra^, srrr aftrg 3{rfen sfrfn nw 31.13ftrri w^rnr fgsm if?rw 'afr^m |2| ..ciih'iTe?-, 3irf3ErraT fgara, w'r^r fbipfr sR^r 4M^ st TOosrropdgr, f^rasp^ ftwr afE-BirfT trrgt jcmsr ft?dr tefi?)^ iiog-o — • — arasw 3HraSiWT sra^Nx %nTin t-fr?T 13 lioyoym'f^v'sfv'VTsfvfw 1985 F'/l L/-.: H!GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) No, 2846 of 2005 PefiSonsr C. R. Kanwar Versus Respondente State of IVI. P. (Now C. G.) & others SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J None for ttie petitioner. V. V. S. Murfchy, Deputy Advocate General with Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the respondents/State. ORDER ( Passed on this 9th day of March, 200T} The following order of the Court is passed by Safish K. Agnihotri. J. Thskur 1. The petitioner while working as Block Education Officer at Korba was transferred to Govt. Higher Secondary School, P.W.D. Rampur, Korba, vide order dated 9.4.1999 (Annexure A/2). 2. No interim relief was granted to the petitioner. 3. Be that as it may, with the passage of time this peUtion has become infructuous as period of transfer is not applicabfe forever. At is point of time there is no question to examine the vafidity of the transfer order. However, the respondents are at liberty to pass appropriate orclers keeping in viewfte pubtic interest and administrative exigency. 4. In viev/ of the above, this petitionis dismissed, as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge