IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 17TH MAY 2010 / 27TH VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 14316 of 2010(L) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SREENIKETHAN CENTRE FOR SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT (REGISTRATION NO.G.190/89), REPRESENTED BY DIRECTOR, DR.N.RAVEENDRAN, CHATHANOOR P.O., KOLLAM-691 572. BY ADVS. SRI.DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, SRI.AJITH KRISHNAN RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY REGISTRAR, KOTTAYAM. 2. VICE CHANCELLOR, M.G.UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM. 3. THE DIRECTOR, THE DISTANCE EDUCATION, M.G.UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS P.O., KOTTAYAM -686 560. 4. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, M.G.UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS P.O., KOTTAYAM -686 560. R1 TO R4 BY SRI. T.A. SHAJI, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/05/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No. 14316 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 17th day of May, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is an educational institution affiliated to the 1st respondent university conducting off-campus courses. The petitioner's institution was an examination centre for examinations for the courses conducted by the petitioner. But by Ext.P2 order, on allegations of malpractices, in the earlier examinations, it has been directed that the examination centre is shifted from the petitioner's school to the nearest Government/aided school. The petitioner now submits that subsequent to Ext.P2 order another order suspending the petitioner's school has also been issued. Petitioner further submits that a copy of the report in Ext.P2 has not been served on the petitioner also. The counsel for the petitioner therefore submits that without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to file a fresh W.P.(C)No. 14316 of 2010 -2- writ petition challenging the suspension order as well as the report relied on in Ext.P2, this writ petition may be closed. 2. I have heard the standing counsel for the University also. In view of the facts mentioned above this writ petition is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to file fresh writ petition to challenge subsequent orders as well as the report. The 1st respondent shall also issue a copy of the report referred to in Ext.P2, to the petitioner within two weeks. S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE shg/