1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3674/2007 {Panchayat Samiti, Malpura Versus Upper District & Sessions Judge & Others} Date of Order :: 24th July, 2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Mr. P.S. Sharma for the petitioner BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The plaintiff-respondents filed a suit for recovery of an amount of Rs. 7400/-, which was decreed ex-parte against the defendant- petitioner. Subsequently an application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC was filed for setting-aside the ex-parte decree which was also dismissed. Being aggrieved with the same, an appeal was also preferred, but the same was also dismissed. Now the present writ petition has been preferred by the defendant-petitioner before this Court. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute that summon of suit was served upon the defendant-petitioner. Both the courts below have examined the matter in detail and 2 have passed detailed and reasoned orders. I do not find any illegality, perversity or jurisdictional error in the said orders so as to interfere with the same. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed with no order as to costs. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. DK