IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14119 of 2009 CHINTU KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.4.2009 Heard Counsel for the petitioner, Counsel for the State and Counsel for the informant. Normally when father of the petitioner was named as an assailant in F.I.R. and that too by his own Bhabhi, the informant, had the petitioner, nephew of the informant, also played any significant role in the occurrence, he must not have been spared. In that view of the matter, the subsequent naming of the petitioner by the informant appears to be one out of family feud. That being so, this Court would direct release of the petitioner, namely, Chintu Kumar on bail in the event of his surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Hilsa (Nalanda) in connection with Khudaganj P.S.case No.56/2008 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Narendra/ ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J. )