Crim.WP 1075/10 - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1075/2010 Suresh @ Sanjay s/o Badal Valvi. ...Petitioner.. Versus The State of Maharashtra & two others. ...Respondents... ..... Smt.Sharda P. Chate, Advocate for petitioner. Shri N.R. Shaikh, APP for respondents. ..... CORAM: P.V. HARDAS & A.V. POTDAR, JJ. DATE: 07.12.2010 PER COURT : Heard learned counsel for the parties. This is a petition filed by the petitioner, a convict, who is undergoing sentence of imprisonment for life and who has made a grievance that despite an order directing his release on parole, the petitioner has not been released on Crim.WP 1075/10 - 2 - parole. In the light of the said grievance, we had directed the learned APP to take instructions as to why the petitioner was not released. The learned APP states, on instructions from the respondents, that the petitioner has not complied with the necessary conditions of furnishing the surety and, therefore, the petitioner has not been released. In that light of the matter and in the light of the fact that there is no statement in the petition that the petitioner has complied with all the legal requirements for his release, we dismiss the petition giving liberty to the petitioner to comply with the conditions within the period stipulated in the rules. The petition is accordingly dismissed with the aforesaid liberty with no order as to costs. (A.V. POTDAR, J.) (P.V. HARDAS, J.) ndk/cr712103