IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 11TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 22ND MAGHA 1929 W.P(C).No. 2743 of 2008(B) -------------------------------- PETITIONERS: ---------------- 1. SASEENDRAN N.P.,VALIYAPOLI POST, OLAT,PILIKODE,KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SRI. I.V. PRAMOD ADV. SRI. K. PRABHAKARAN, SC FOR KSRTC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 2743 OF 2008 B = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 11th February, 2008 J U D G M E N T The challenge in this writ petition is against Exts. P1 and P2. By Ext. P1, the application for regular permit was rejected on the ground of overlapping on Modified Supplementation Scheme. This finding of the 1st respondent was confirmed by the STAT dismissing M.V.A.A. No. 537 of 2007 filed against Ext. P1 and Ext. P2 is the judgment. This concurrent finding of fact, is only to be upheld and in the absence of anything suggesting to the contrary. Petitioner claims that he is entitled to take benefit of Ext. P4, notification dated 9.5.2007 and wants to apply for a modified route. If it is so permissible, it is up to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority. Writ petition is disposed of. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-