IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc No. M-2560 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision : 22.05.2009 Dharam Pal and Others ....Petitioners V/s State of Punjab ....Respondent BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. L.M. Gulati, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG Punjab. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) On the last date of hearing following orders were passed :- “Counsel submits that the petitioners were not initially named in the FIR. Their name figured for the first time in the supplementary statement, which was recorded after a lapse of 21 days from the registration of the FIR. Counsel further submits that all other accused are on bail and the trial is proceeding before the Court of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Baba Bakala. According to the counsel, the petitioners are ready to face trial after having been summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C. Notice of motion for 29.04.2009. Meanwhile, if the petitioners surrenders before the trial court, they shall be admitted to bail to the satisfaction of the said Court.” Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that pursuant to above order, the petitioners have appeared before the trial court and furnished the bail bonds. This factual contention is not dispute by learned State counsel who has made this statement on instructions from S.I. Crl. Misc No. M-2560 of 2009 (O&M) -2- Joginder Singh, who is present in Court. In view of this, the instant petition is allowed. The petitioners are granted the concession of anticipatory bail subject to the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. 22.05.2009 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE