Crl. Misc No. M 29398 of 2011 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc No. M 29398 of 2011 Date of decision : October 13, 2011 Sunita Rani, ...... Petitioner v. State of Punjab, ...... Respondent *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Gill, DAG Punjab *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) The petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.359, dated 6.10.2010, registered under Sections 406, 420, 465, 468, 471 of the IPC, at Police Station Kotwali, Patiala. On 27.9.2011, the following contention was noticed :- “ Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is a simple house wife who has no knowledge or connection with the allegations made in the FIR.” Counsel for the respondent, on instructions from HC Inderpal Singh, has stated that there is ample record which reveals the connection of the petitioner. He has particularly relied upon the correspondence Crl. Misc No. M 29398 of 2011 ::2:: exchanged between the petitioner and the complainant in this regard. In these circumstances, I do not deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Consequently, this petition is dismissed. ( AJAY TEWARI ) October 13, 2011. JUDGE `kk'