IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3031 of 2006 PASHUPATI MISHRA, SON OF LATE RAM KISHORE MISHRA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND POST- CHATARO, DISTT. VAISHALI... PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. Mr.Uday shankar Prasad, THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (FUND ) BIHAR PATNA. 3. MR. RAJ KUMAR SINGH, COMMISSIONER, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 4. MR. RAM DHYAN RAM, CHIEF ENGINEER-4, RURAL ENGINEERING ORGANISATION (HEAD QUARTERS), BIHAR, PATNA. 5. MR. PRABHAKAR JHA, REGISTRAR, R.E.O. (HEAD QUARTER), BIHAR, PATNA. 6. MR. SUBRAT SARKAR, DY SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, PATNA................ OPP.PARTIES ----------- FOR THE STATE ;- MR. SHAMBHU NATH,A.C. TO G.P.X FOR THE A.G. MR. RAJNANDAN PD. ADVOCATE ---------------- 4 7-10-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel appearing for respondent no.2 who has filed a show cause. From the show cause filed on behalf of opposite parties 3 to 6 and particularly paragraph-5 thereof it is clear that entire pension and gratuity of the petitioner has been sanctioned long back and even interest appears to have been sanctioned in the year 2007. In the facts of the case the contempt petition is finally disposed of. If for any reason sanctioned amount has not been not been paid to the petitioner as yet then petitioner - 2 - will be at liberty to file a representation before the authority concerned who will ensure payment of sanctioned amount without any delay preferably within two months. ( Shiva Kirti Singh,ACJ)