IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.283 of 2008 In (CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE 15681/2005) 01. The State Of Bihar & Ors 02. The Secretary Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna 03. The District Magistrate, Bhagalpur 04. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Bhagalpur 05. The Joint Agricultural Director, Bhagalpur 06. The District Agriculture Officer, Bhagalpur ….. Respondents/ Appellants Versus 01. Sargun Prasad Singh, S/o Sudan Shau Prasad Singh, Resident of village- Babhan Korma, P.S.- Rajoun, District- Bhagalpur 02. Ranjeet Prasad Mandal, S/o Ram Charitar Mandal, Resident of Village-Fatehpur, P.S.- Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur ….. Petitioners/Respondents For the Petitioners:- Mr. Rakesh Kumar Samrendra, SC-21 & Mr. Md. Obaidullah, AC to SC-21 For the Respondents:- Mr. Sanjay Kr. Ghosarvey & Mr. M.K. Mishra, Advocates ---------------------------------- 06. 15.09.2011 The matter has been heard at length. After hearing the learned A.C. to S.C-21 in the L.P.A. filed against the order dated 13.08.2007 in C.W.J.C. No. 15681 of 2005. The matter revolved around the power of Selection Committee to set out the procedure in the meeting dated 28.2.1992 which is admittedly not consistent with the Advertisement. The learned Single Judge having gone into the matter in extenso and having followed the judgment of this Court rendered in C.W.J.C. No. 427 of 1993 dated 26.7.1993 (Dilip Kumar Gupta Versus 2 State of Bihar & Others) have held that the selection Committee can not set the norms which is referable in the original Advertisement. The same issue has already been dealt with in the above judgment. The learned Single Judge has held that the procedure adopted is in defiance of the above judgment and having heard so, has observed that Annexure-B and B/1 to the counter affidavit filed by the State have to be excluded from consideration so far as the respondents/petitioners are concerned and steps have to be taken accordingly. Having held so, the learned Single Judge has directed the District Magistrate, Bhagalpur to proceed and reconsider the case of the respondents in accordance with law within a period of two months for compliance of order of this Court. In view of the observation of the learned Single Judge as the judgment has been rendered on the basis of the earlier order passed by this Court, we are of the opinion that the order needs no interference and accordingly this L.P.A. is dismissed. P.K. (T. Meena Kumari, J.) (Vikash Jain, J.)