IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 4095 of 2010 Date of Decision:-22.11.2011 M/s Associated Printers and others .....Petitioners Versus Chandigarh Administration and others .....Respondents CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH Present:- Mr. Chetan Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Alok Jain, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. K.K. Gupta, Advocate, for the respondents. **** SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J.(Oral) The petitioners have filed C.M. No.15760 of 2011 for impleading the owners (landlords) of the premises as respondents No.7 to 10 in the array of parties. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners, who are tenants, challenging the order dated 18.2.2010 (Annexure P22) without impleading the landlords. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh writ petition, after impleading the landlords of the premises, on the same cause of action challenging the impugned order, within ten days and during the said period the petitioners may be protected from implementation of the said order dated 18.2.2010. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection if the petitioners are permitted to withdraw this petition and grant protection for 10 days. C.W.P. No. 4095 of 2010 -2- In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action after impleading the owners. For ten days, the implementation of the impugned order dated 18.2.2010 (Annexure P22) shall remain stayed. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE 22.11.2011 (PARAMJEET SINGH ) aarti/vkg JUDGE