In the High Court of Judicature at Patna. Cr.Misc. No. 17839 of 2009 Sunil Singh Vs. State of Bihar 2 13.5.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. This Court is not persuaded that sufficient ground has been made out in the application for extension of time to surrender. The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner is required to be considered on the date that the petitioner surrenders keeping in mind that he was granted anticipatory bail but could not surrender, without being prejudiced by the present order. Let this order be communicated to the Court of S.D.J.M in connection with Complaint case No. 2110 of 2004 by Fax at the cost of the petitioner. (Navin Sinha,J.) A.Kumar