IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION LODGING NO.1926 OF 2006 PETITION LODGING NO.1926 OF 2006 PETITION LODGING NO.1926 OF 2006 Rameshchandra Gopinath Das...Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtara & Anr..Respondents None for the petitioner Mr. R.j. Mane, AGp for Respondent No.1. Ms.A.K.Savla, for Respondent No.2. CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. V.MOHTA, JJ. V.MOHTA, JJ. DATE: DATE: DATE: 18TH AUGUST,2006 18TH AUGUST,2006 18TH AUGUST,2006 P.C. . When the matter is called out none present for the petitioner. On behalf of the respondent learned Counsel points out that as the matter pertains to cancellation of licence in accordance with the provisions of Section 394 of the B.M.C. Act the petitioner has a remedy at law by preferring an Appeal. Considering that there is an alternate efficacious remedy this would not be a fit case for this Court to exercise its extra ordinary jurisdiction. Petition rejected. (F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) (ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.). V.MOHTA, J.). V.MOHTA, J.).