IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 28TH AUGUST 2008 / 6TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 37929 of 2007(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- K.P.RANADEVAN, REJIN NIVAS, EZHUPUNNA P.O., CHERTHALA. BY ADV. SRI.SEBASTIAN DAVIS RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, EZHUPUNNA GRAMA PANCHAYATH (SPECIAL GRADE), EZHUPUNNA P.O., CHERTHALA. 2. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, THATHAMPALLY P.O., ALAPPUZHA. 3. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER (HEALTH), ALAPPUZHA. 4. K.N.CHANDRAN, CHANDRALAYAM, EZHUPUNNA P.O., CHERTHALA. BY ADV. SRI.P.RADHAKRISHNAN (1) FOR R.4 SRI.MADHU RADHAKRISHNAN FOR R.4 SRI.P.N.PURUSHOTHAMA KAIMAL FOR R1 SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHAN DAS, SC, PCB GOVT.PLEADER SRI.K.V.MANOJ KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.37929/07 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DT 26.9.2007. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF the NO OBJECTION CERTIFICATE FROM THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 13.9.2007. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE HEALTH SUPERVISOR, C.H.C., THURAVOOR DT 10.10.2007. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE TRIBUNAL ORDER DT 7.12.2007. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATIN FOR LICENCE DT 15.12.2007. EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DT 17.12.2007 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXTS. OF R1 EXT.R1(a): TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF INSPECTION REPORT OF HEALTH INSPECTOR, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, EZHUPUNNA DT 15.12.2007. EXTS. OF R4 EXT.R4(a): TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN OP 7867/98. EXT.R4(b): TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT IN WPC NO.18221/07. EXT.R4(c): TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICE DT 9.1.2008 ALONG WITHLETTER ISSUED BYTHE INFORMATION OFFICER. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 37929 OF 2007 M ==================== Dated this the 28th day of August, 2008 J U D G M E N T The writ petition concerns the functioning of a piggery farm owned by the petitioner. The licence application made by the petitioner was rejected by the 1st respondent and thereupon the petitioner filed an appeal before the Committee of the Panchayat. According to the counsel for the 1st respondent, the said appeal is being considered by the Committee. 2. In view of the pendency of the appeal as confirmed by the counsel appearing for the 1st respondent, it is only proper that the Panchayat Committee considers the appeal with notice to the petitioner and others and pass final orders in the matter. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible. It is directed that in the meanwhile, the interim order dated 19/12/2007 passed by this court in this writ petition will remain in force. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp