IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 1ST MARCH 2010 / 10TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 6424 of 2010(C) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- M/S.KONCHERRY INTERNATIONAL, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, DR.K.S.SUSEELAN, MAYITHARA MARKET P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.C.ELDHO RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE ASSISANT COMMISSIONR (ASSESSMENT) COMMERCIAL TAXES, SPECIAL CIRCLE, ALAPPUZHA. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONR (APPEALS) COMMECIAL TAXES, KOLLAM. 3. THE TAHSILDAR (RR) O/O.THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, CHERTHALA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV. MR. C.K. GOVINDAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. W.P.(C) No. 6424 OF 2010 ......................................................................... Dated this the 1st March, 2010 J U D G M E N T Being aggrieved of Exts.P3 and P4 orders passed by the first respondent, the petitioner has approached the second respondent/appellate authority by filing Ext. P6 appeal along with a petition for stay and a petition to condone the delay in filing the appeal. The petitioner is now before this Court because of the recovery proceedings being pursued by the third respondent at the instance of the first respondent, as borne by Ext.P5, which hence is sought to be intercepted by this Court. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances, the second respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on the petition to condone the delay in filing the appeal and also on the petition for stay, which are stated as preferred along with Ext.P6 appeal and pending before the second respondent. W.P.(C) No. 6424 OF 2010 2 Appropriate orders shall be passed in the above petitions in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible at any rate within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. It is made clear that till such orders are passed on the petitions for condonation of delay and petition for stay, as above, all further proceedings pursuant to Ext. P5 shall be kept in abeyance. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk