1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION (W) NO.2994 OF 2011. IN WRIT PETITION NO.2388 OF 2011. (Smt. Shashikala Wd/o Ashok Naidu Vs. Dr. (Mrs.) Vandana Khushalani and others) __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. Shri D.A. Sonwane, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri P.C. Marpakwar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. CORAM: B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 2011. Heard. Prayer is partly allowed. Petitioner is permitted to withdraw the subsistence/suspension allowance of Rs.40,344/- with interest accrued thereon. Advocate Shri Sonwane for the petitioner states that enquiry is nothing but victimization of the present petitioner. The learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the charges levelled against the petitioner about the alleged misconduct are false. We have perused the impugned order dated 18.03.2010. It reveals that misconduct alleged is of later dates. The past history at this stage cannot 2 be taken into account to infer that the allegations of misconduct levlled therein are false. In this situation, we direct the respondents to complete the departmental inquiry at the earliest and in any case within period of three months from today. The petitioner is allowed to withdraw the subsistence allowance as mentioned in the application. The said payment shall be continued during the pendency of departmental inquiry. With these directions, we dispose of the petition. No order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE NSN