IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.2324 OF 2004 PETITION NO.2324 OF 2004 PETITION NO.2324 OF 2004 Maitrini Mahila Mandal & Ors.....Petitioners Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors...................Respondents Mr. N.S. Dube, i/b.A.B. Desai, for the Petitioners Ms. N.V.Sanglikar, for Respondents 1 to 4. Mr. Bhavesh Parmar, for Respondent NO.5. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & S.P.KUKDAY, F.I. REBELLO & S.P.KUKDAY, F.I. REBELLO & S.P.KUKDAY, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 23rd March, 2005 : 23rd March, 2005 : 23rd March, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks time. Matter is pending since 16th June, 2004. Counsel for Respondent NO.5 points out that at the instance of respondent No.5 a Scheme of engaging contract workers itself was modified. Since then the term of the contract has come to an end and new contracts have been awarded. In the light of that nothing survives in this matter which is accordingly disposed of. 2. If the petitioners are entitled to any compensation it will be open to them to move such forum which in law they are entitled to. (F.I. (F.I. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) (S.P. (S.P. (S.P. KUKDAY, J.) KUKDAY, J.) KUKDAY, J.)