1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10049 OF 2009 N.K.T. Thanawala Educational & Charitable Trust. ... Petitioner Vs. The Regional Director, Western Region Committee,NCTE & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. C.K.Thomas i/b. C.K. Thomas & Associates, Advocates, for the petitioner. Mr. Uday Warunjikar, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. V.S.Masurkar, Govt. Pleader, for respondent No.3. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 1st December, 2009. P.C. 1. The Petitioner is aggrieved by the communication dated 9.3.2009 whereby the application by the petitioners for opening D.Ed. College has been rejected on the ground of negative recommendations by the State Government. 2 2. On 3.2.2009, the respondent No.2 had informed the Regional Director including Respondent No.1 that the applications by minority institutions should be considered even from such States which have imposed a ban. Similar petitions have come up for consideration before this Court being, Writ Petition No.1802 of 2009 disposed on 13.4.2009 as also Writ Petition No.4053 of 2009 and other petitions disposed of on 24.6.2009 whereby this Court has directed respondent no. 1 to reconsider/review their decision. In the light of that, the following order : 3. The impugned order dated 9.3.2009 is set aside. The respondent No.1 is directed to reconsider the Petitioner’s case for the academic year 2010-11. The decision to be taken within two months from today. Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)