1 THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1974 OF 2009 Arjun s/o Shripati Thakur, Age: 43 years, Occ: At present Nil, R/o. Shamnagar, Latur, Tq. & Dist. Latur. ... Petitioner Versus The Divisional Controller, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Latur, Ambajogai Road, Latur. ...Respondent ... Mr. V.D. Gunale, Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. R.D. Reddy, Advocate for respondent sole. ... CORAM : K.K. TATED, J. DATE : 31st JULY, 2009. PER COURT : 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of both the parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final hearing at admission stage. 2 2. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the respondent. 3. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 05-01-2009 passed by the Member, Industrial Court, Latur on stay application filed by the respondent in Revision Application No. 21/2008. 4. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that if the Revision Application is decided as early as possible but in any case, within six months from today, then he is not pressing for this Writ Petition. The submission of the learned Counsel is reasonable and proper. 5. Without going into the merits of the matter, the following order is passed. 6. The Member, Industrial Court, Latur is directed to decide the Revision Application NO.21/2008 as early as possible, but in any case, within six 3 months from the date of receipt of writ from this Court. Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. Rule made absolute in above terms. (K.K. TATED,J.) sut/JUL09/wp1974.09