IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21884 of 2010 CHANDAN CHAUDHARY @ CHANDAN KUMAR CHAUDHARY S/O MATUKI CHAUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 05.7.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that in fact even though the victim has given a statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. but the same is not very reliable since there are material to suggest that the petitioner and the victim had married each other and the victim has not alleged any sexual assault upon herself. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, in connection with Barari P.S. case no. 151/2009, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailors will be a close - 2 - relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays and trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )