1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.03.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH W.A.(MD).No.276 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 1.The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District. 2. The District Employment Officer, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District. 3. The District Elementary Educational Officer, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District. ..Appellants/Respondents Vs. V.Uma ..Respondent/Petitioner PRAYER: Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 03.04.2008 made in W.P.(MD).No.3162 of 2008 on the file of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.B5/14201/2008, dated 20.03.2008 and quash the same and direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to have her employment exchange registration retained in Sivagangai District and to appoint her as Secondary Grade Teacher from the date on which her junior was appointed with all the consequential benefits. For Appellant : Mr.R.Janakiramalu Special Government Pleader For Respondent : Mr.V.Paneerselvam JUDGMENT [Judgment of the Court was delivered BY N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR, J This Writ Appeal is filed against the order dated 03.04.2008 made in W.P.(MD).No.3162 of 2008 by the appellant allowing the writ petition filed by the first respondent, wherein the first respondent has prayed to quash the order dated 20.03.2008 and direct the appellant the permit the petitioner to have hei employment exchange https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 registration retained in Sivagangai District for appointment as Secondary Grade Teacher from the date on which her junior was appointed with all the consequential benefits. 2.The learned single Judge allowed the writ petition with a direction to the appellant to appoint the first respondent as Secondary Grade Teacher within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of the production of the order. The order is challenged in the Writ Appeal. 3.The learned counsel for the appellant submits that on 16.07.2009, the first respondent was appointed as Secondary Grade Teacher and now the respondent is serving as a Secondary Grade Teacher and the said submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent is recorded. 4.In view of the appointment already obtained by the first respondent, the direction issued by the learned single Judge need not be complied with, which is subject matter of challenge in this writ appeal. The writ appeal is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(C.O.) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District. 2. The District Employment Officer, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District. 3. The District Elementary Educational Officer, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District. +1cc to Mr.V.Panneer Selvam, Advocate Sr.No.11772 +1cc to The Special Government Pleader, SR.No.11585 MPK akm/18.03.11 /2p-6c/ JUDGMENT MADE IN W.A.(MD).No.276 of 2011 04.3.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/