IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No. 10307 of 2002 Between: A.P.S.R.T.C., Rep. by its Managing Director, Mushirabad, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Rep. by its Presiding Officer, Manoranjan Complex, M.J.Road, Nampally, Andhra Pradesh. 2 The Regional Transport Authority, Rep. by its Secretary, West Godavari District, Eluru. 3 M.S.V.Krishnarjuna, Bus Owner, R/o.Pendyala. West Godavari District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction especially in the nature of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned order dt;12.2.2002 in RP.100/2000 on the file of the state Transport Appellate Tribunal, A.P., Hyderabad, dismissing the revision filed against the order dt:27.5.2000 in item No.61 in R.No.5571/A3/2000 of the Regional Transport Authority, West Godavari granting permit to the 3rd Respondent to ply on the alleged town service route Nidadavolu RTC Bus Stand to Devarapalli and quash the same as being hit by the provisions of Secs., 68(3)(ca) and 104 of M.V.Act, 1988. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.KALLAKURI SRINIVASARAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR TRANSPORT The Court made the following : ORDER: Sri K.Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. ____________ C.V. RAMULU,J 23.06.2009 v v