SKS^ P Rrasr'u Si^ IN THE HON'BLE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTtS6ARH AT BILASPUR WRTT PETrTION (S) N0^^22-/2009 PETTrrONER VERSUS .f .ks6- ./^ .^' .^•" ..-' (^•' Q^' ..••-" ^>.-v..7:^ ,;"^b? SP'' -;~"^'\^.'' ^y.y ^r.^" Ku. Usha Patnayak, aged about 57 years, Daughter of Shri Anadi Prasad Patnayak, "Upper Division Teacher", 6ovt. Sirls Middle School - Sarangarh, Block - 5arangarh, Tahsil- Sarangarh, bistt- Raigarh (C.6.) The State of Chhattisgarh, Secretary, bepartment of School Education, Mantralaya, Dau Kalyon Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.) The District Education Officer, District - Officer, (C.6.) The Block Education WRTT PETTTEON U/A - 226 OFTHE CONSTTTUTrON OF ZNNA HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISQAaH AT BILASPUR • 'Lsrvxsttv s* 'sxjf'OT .i"?'?<E'itTrlt's'1 ?>^3'ir/^¥W1E^'1Cl'SS TtS"<E3yA'£« L^.- U W O A 1^/Sf fJ^i 2 iSf jn.dr^. .L?A ¥Sf-f*5"S.^^ PBTITIONBR W.P4S) N0. 4722/200° Ku. Usha Patnayak Versus State of C.G. & Others WBIT PETITION OTiDER ARTICLB 226 OF THS CONSTITUTIOS OF mmA ApDearasce: Shri Roop Naik, counsel for the petitioner. Ms. SunitaJain, P.L. for the State. (26.08.2009) With the consent ot' the counsel t'or the parties, the matter is heard finaiiy. By way of this petition the oetitioner is seeking reguiar pay scale on the oost of Assistant Teacher. Counsel for the petitioner subinits that nurnber of identicai petitions have been decided by this Court aiid the issue involved is a concluded one. He has also referred to one of the orders in W.P.(S) No. 813/2007 (Ram Kumar Saiiu Vs. State of Chhattisgarh'i in which regular pay scale was granted from the date of initial appointment. Counsel for the State submits that at this stage he can not make any statement before this Court as to whether case ot the petitioner is covered with the order passed in aforementioned writ petition. However, he submits that if the petitioner makes a representation to the concemed respondent, the same shaii be decided at'ter scrutinizing the factua! and iegal ocsition. Thus, it is directed that if the petitioner makes a representation to the aythorities concemed within a period ol three weeks i'rom the date of receipt of copy of this order, the saiTie shaii be decided within a further period of one month from the date of its receipt. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge