Civil Revision No.476 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.476 of 2010 Date of Decision:31.03.2010 Raj Singh .... petitioner Versus Bimla Devi & ors. .....respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Vikram Singh,Advocate for the petitioner **** RAKESH KUMAR GARG J.(ORAL): This is plaintiff's revision petition challenging the order dated 07.09.2009, whereby application under Order 39 Rule 2-A read with Section 151 CPC for punishing the respondents for violating the interim order dated 24.11.2006 passed by the trial Court was rejected. It is not in dispute that the interim order dated 24.11.2006, the violation of which is alleged by the petitioner has been vacated in an order passed by the Court of Additional District Judge, Rewari on an appeal filed by the respondent and has come to an end. Even the main proceedings under Section 18 and 30 of the Land Acquisition Act pending before the Reference Court, in which the aforesaid interim order was passed have come to an end. In view of the aforesaid factual position, I am not inclined to Civil Revision No.476 of 2010 2 interfere in this revision petition. Dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 31.03.2010 neenu