IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10662 of 2011 MAMOD @ PRAMOD @ MANOJ PANJIYARA SON OF JANARDAN PANJIYARA. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 22.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 504 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code. Initially, the final form was submitted, but now, the petitioner has been made accused in exercise of power under Section 319 Cr.P.C. It appears that the charge sheeted accused have already been convicted. It is further submitted that other similarly situated person has been granted anticipatory bail by the learned court below. The learned Sessions Judge has not considered the evidences which persuaded the trial court to summon the petitioner in excise of the power under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C. The impugned order even does not stipulate at what stage the power under Section 319(1) Cr.P.C. 2 was exercised by the learned trial court and when such application was filed before the trial court. Considering the fact that at much belated stage, the power under Section 319(1) Cr.P.C. was exercised, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Addl. District Judge -IV, Banka in connection with Banka P.S. Case No. 93/2000, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)