IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9482 of 2009 1. BABAN PRASAD, Son of Sri Kishun Gond, resident of village – Nal Band Toli, Police Station – Buxar, District – Buxar. 2. Vinod Kumar Prasad, Son of Sri Kanhaiya Prasad, resident of village – Purana Bhojpur Chowk, Ara Mor, P.S. Buxar, District – Buxar. 3. Radha Prasad Sah, Son of Sri Raj Nath Sah, resident of village – Brahmpur, Police Station – Brahmpur, District – Buxar. 4. Satish Kumar, Son of Sri Manoj Kumar, resident of village – Gajadharganj, Station Road, Police Station – Buxar, District – Buxar. ….. Petitioners. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Secretary, Personnel & Administrative Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4. The District Magistrate, Buxar. …. Respondents. ----------- 02/ 10.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners are the Assistants -cum- Clerks. They were appointed against the Advertisement No. 02 of 1998 issued by the Bihar Public Service Commission. They have filed this writ application for a direction to the State respondents to consider their case for grant of revised pay scale of Rs.4000/- 6000/-, as according to them other similarly situate persons had approached this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 13577 of 2006 for similar relief, which was allowed under order dated 17.12.2007, Annexure-4 to this application, against which the State respondents preferred L.P.A. No. 522 of 2008, which was also dismissed under orders dated 29.9.2008. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that their case is also covered by the aforesaid two orders dated 17.12.2007 and 29.9.2008. 4. Let the District Magistrate, Buxar consider the - 2 - representation of the petitioners, as contained in Annexure-3 to this application in the light of the aforesaid two orders dated 17.12.2007 and 29.9.2008 and pass appropriate reasoned order in accordance with law as early as possible, in any case within two months from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order. In the event, representation is allowed, it goes without saying that petitioners be allowed the consequential benefit. 5. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. DKS/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)