IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. BIKSHAPATHY WRIT PETITION NO : 2291 of 1995 Between: C.Mallikarjuna Reddy S/o.Govinda Reddy R/o.516-24 Railway Quarter Chilkalaguda Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Divisional Security Comissioner Railway Protection Force South Central Railway Secunderabad Division Hyderabad. 2 G.P.Ramaiah Enquiry Officer,CBI Inspector Hyderabad Division Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the respondents in proceedings with the departmental enquiry against the petitioners as illegal and direct the respondents not to proceed with the departmental enquiry till the completion of Criminal case pending before the XIII M.M.Railways Court in C.C.No.3/94 against the petitioner and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.GANGA RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.GOWRI SHANKAR SANGHI (SC FOR RAILWAYS) The Court made the following: ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. ________________ G.BIKSHAPATHY, J Dated 07th October, 2004. YCR/KVRM To 1 The Divisional Security Commissioner Railway Protection Force, South Central Railway Secunderabad Division, Hyderabad. 2 The Enquiry Officer,CBI Inspector, Hyderabad Division, Secunderabad. 3. 2 C.D. copies.