IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6714 of 2011 NAVIN YADAV @ NAVIN KUMAR YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 24.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 30.11.2010 in a case registered under Sections 363 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged by the informant that his sister went outside to ease out when she was abducted, whereas, in 164 Cr.P.C. statement, the victim girl alleged that this petitioner entered into the house and took her forcibly to his house and established forceful physical relationship. It appears that the victim has filed Complaint Case No. 3305/2010 describing herself as wife of this petitioner in which the informant and other being made accused. The medical report suggests the age of the victim as 18 to 19 years and no resisting injuries have been found on the victim. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the 2 informant that the petitioner is a married person. Considering the inconsistency between the F.I.R and the 164 Cr.P.C. statement moreover the conduct of the victim by filing the complaint which still has not been withdrawn by the victim girl, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with Azamnagar P.S. Case No. 156/2010. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)