HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 16th December, 2006 First Bail Application No. 1048 of 2006 Order on the bail application of the accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Parvez, S/o Mohd. Alam, R/o Mohalla-Laddawala, Muzaffarnagar, District- Muzaffarnagar. …..…..Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttaranchal ……Opposite Party ______________________________________________________ In Case Crime No. 246 of 2006 U/s 392, 411 I.P.C. P.S. Manglaur, District - Haridwar. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BY THE COURT Hon'ble Rajesh Tandon, J. The applicant-Parvez, who is Jail in connection with Crime No. 246 of 2006 U/s 392, 411 I.P.C., P.S. Manglaur, District-Haridwar has applied for bail. Heard Sri Rajendra Singh, counsel for the applicant and A.G.A. for the State. Perused the F.I.R. The incident took place on 08.08.2006 at about 11:30 p.m. F.I.R. was lodged against two persons namely Sandeep Thakur S/o Sri Sube Singh & Vijay Jain S/o not known. The applicant-accused has not been named in the F.I.R. Counsel for the applicant has stated that initially there was no case of snatching of Mobile and later on the same has been inserted in the F.I.R. According to the applicant, the main accused are Sandeep Thakur and Vijay Jain. However, without expressing anything on merits, it appears to be a fit case for bail. Let the applicant be released on bail on executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar. This order shall not be treated as a parity for any application to be filed by co-accused Sandeep Thakur and Vijay Jain and their role shall be examined independently. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) Dated 16.12.2006 Rathour