IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 6972 of 2010 Date of decision : 18.08.2011 Pyare Lal Chauhan ...Petitioner Versus The Govt. of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. Pyare Lal Chauhan, petitioner in person. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH J. The petitioner is working as Full time member of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Hisar. The petitioner is aggrieved against the action of the respondent in paying honorarium of ` 10,000/-, which according to him, was inadequate. The petitioner claims regular pay scale of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate or District Attorney atleast from the date he has surrendered his licence as an Advocate. In the prayer clause, however, the petitioner has asked for honorarium of ` 40,000/- in place of ` 10,000/-. Notice of motion was issued,. No reply has been filed. Today, Mr. Rathee has handed over the copy of the order passed by the Government increasing the honorarium to the petitioner to ` 20,000/-. A copy of the order is handed over to the petitioner, who appears in person. The petitioner further submits that he is not Civil Writ Petition No. 6972 of 2010 -2- satisfied as his full claim, as made in the petition, is not allowed. The petitioner prays for time to file fresh petition for the same cause to challenge the impugned order now passed during the pendency of the writ petition. Liberty as prayed for is granted. The present writ petition is, therefore, become infructuous and is disposed of as such. The petitioner is justified in making a grievance that he has to appear in person on as many as five occasions and the State has still not filed reply. The petitioner is, therefore, held entitled to costs of ` 5,000/-. August 18, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH) rts JUDGE