IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 486 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 08/06/2007 in WP NO : 208 OF 1998 on the file of the High Court.) Between: M.A. Syeed, S/o. MA Gani, Ideal College, Kakinada - 533 004. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 Govt. of Andhra Pradesh Rep by its Secretary Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 Commissioner of Collegiate Education, Nampally, A.P. Hyderabad 3 Ideal College, Rep by its Correspondent Indrapalem, Kakinada. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:MR.M.V.S.SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following : JUDGMENT: (Per Sri Anil R. Dave, CJ) Learned Advocate for the appellant has submitted that he would make a comprehensive representation to the respondent-employer on the subject matter of the petition. Learned Advocate for the respondent-employer has submitted that the representation, which might be received from the appellant would be forwarded to the respondent- Government along with its remarks. We are sure that if a representation is made, it will be considered as soon as possible in accordance with law and the fact with regard to the length of service put in by the appellant shall also be considered not only by the respondent-employer but also by the respondent-Government. In view of the development in the matter, learned Advocate for the appellant does not want to press the appeal. The appeal stands disposed of as not pressed with no order as to costs. _____________________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ _________________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 24th October, 2008. GRR