IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4557 of 2009 BHARATI KUMARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 10.04.2009 Heard leaned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The claim in this writ application is for extension of a contractual appointment. The rules for appointment itself state that it shall be for a period of eleven months. Renewal thereafter remains a matter in the discretion of the respondents. The appointment letter of the petitioner specifically limits the duration of the appointment. As per the case of the petitioner herself, from Annexure 16, the respondents did not find her performance satisfactory. In absence of any legal right of extension of the contractual appointment, this Court finds no merit in this application. This writ application is dismissed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)