1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 1740 of 2008. Vinayak T. Borokar and others ..vs.. Dnyandeo T. Borokar ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances,Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri N. N. Motghare Advocate, for the petitioner. Coram: A. H. JOSHI, J. Dated: 29th APRIL 2008. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner has challenged the order passed below exhibit 8 whereby the appellate Court has refused to grant stay and only directed respondent to maintain status quo as to title of suit property. 3. It is seen from the copy of decree of trial Court tendered for perusal of the Court that the decree of trial court for possession as well as injunction. 4. In the application for stay, no statement is shown that during the pendency of suit plaintiff's possession was not protected. Moreover, there is no rigid that during pendency of appeal stay, injunction etc. must be granted. The petitioner has failed to make out case for stay as well for suspension of 2 injunction. 5. Nothing is shown in the impugned order to indicate it to be illegal or eroneouss. Hence, no interference is called for. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE andurkar.