SB Crlmb No.5744/10. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B.CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.5744/2010. Lokesh Puri Goswami Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order : July 6, 2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Pradeep Mathur for petitioner. Shri Amit Poonia, Public Prosecutor for State. ****** Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Learned counsel for petitioner has argued that allegation of rape against the accused petitioner is totally false and baseless. Learned counsel referred to the statements of the prosecutrix aged 31 years wherein, she has stated that she consented to have sexual intercourse with her by the petitioner on the premise that petitioner would marry with her and in the self- same statement, she has further stated that she was already married from before and had two issues and further that petitioner was also married and also had two issues. Learned counsel for petitioner has argued that tenor of the statement clearly shows that it was not at all a clear case of rape and that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Even otherwise, SB Crlmb No.5744/10. 2 petitioner is in jail since 8/4/2010. Challan has already been filed. Trial of the case will take a long. There is no other case pending against the petitioner. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Considering the submissions made at the bar, the nature of accusation, the materials on record and all other facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. In the result, this bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Lokesh Puri Goswami S/o Shri Nathuram shall be released on bail in FIR No.184/2010 P.S. Nayapura, Kota for offence u/Ss.376 and 506 IPC on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing until conclusion of the trial. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil