FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 487 OF 2010 (Ku.Hamnabai d/o Raosaheb Pimple Vs. State and ors) ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Learned counsel for the petitioner states that despite of the fact that there is a judgment of the Division Bench of this Court, wherein, the petitioners in that case, were granted similar relief as claimed by the present petitioner, the respondents are not deciding the claim of the petitioner. Writ petition stands disposed of with direction to the respondents to decide the claim of the petitioner in accordance with the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in writ petition No. 6437 of 2007 (Govind Narayan Gunajal Vs. state of Maharashtra), dated 12.3.2008 so also on the basis of the principles enunciated by the Supreme court in the case of State of Maharashtra Vs. Tukaram Tryambak Chaudhari and others (2007 AIR SCW 13221). No order as to costs. (S. S. SHINDE. J.) (A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.) Date:28.01.2010. rlj/