IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 6TH JANUARY 2009 / 16TH POUSHA 1930 CRP.No. 699 of 2008() --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER N IA 2182008 IN WOS.21/2008 of WAKF TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): PETITIONERS/PLAINTIFFS ------------------------------------------- 1. IBRAHIM, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O.LATE ALI, THAIPARAMBIL HOUSE, P.O.KOORKANCHERY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. FRANCIS.E.K., AGED 51 YEARS, ERAKULAM HOUSE, KOORKANCHERI P.O. THRISSUR - 7. BY ADV. SRI.ESM.KABEER RESPONDENT(S): DEFENDANTS ------------------------- 1. CHETTIYANGADI HANAFI SUNNATH JAMA-ATH MASJID COMMITTEE, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MR.BASITH. 2. ISMAIL SHARIF, PRESIDENT, CHETTIYANGADI HANAFI SUNNATH, JAMA-ATH MASJID COMMITTEE. 3. MAJEED, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O.SAITHU, KALLIPARAMBIL HOUSE, OLLUKARA VILLAGE, KALATHODU DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK. 4. KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, VIP ROAD, KALOOR P.O., KOCHI-17. ADV. SRI.M.M.SAIDU MUHAMMED,SC,WAKF BOARD FOR R4 SRI.P.M.MOHAMMED SHIRAZ FOR R1 THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER IN I.A. NO. 2111 OF 2008 IN C.R.P. NO. 699 OF 2008. DISMISSED 6.1.2009 Sd/-(P.R. RAMAN, JUDGE) Sd/-(C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) P.R. RAMAN & C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ. --------------------------------------------------------- C.R.P. NO. 699 OF 2008 --------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of January, 2009 O R D E R Raman J. This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the interim order dated 2.9.2008 in I.A. No.218 of 2008 in W.O.S. No.21 of 2008 of the Wakf Tribunal, Ernakulam by which the application for injunction filed by the revision petitioners - plaintiffs was dismissed. This Court by an interim order directed that the revision petitioners shall not be evicted except in accordance with law. When the matter was taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the first respondent submitted that the suit itself has been dismissed on 31.12.2008. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous and it is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. (P.R. RAMAN) JUDGE (C.T. RAVIKUMAR) JUDGE sp/ 2 P.R. RAMAN & C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ. C.R.P. NO. 699/2008 O R D E R 6th January, 2009