THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 3019 of 2010 Oral order: This revision is directed against the order dated 16-4-2010 rejecting I.A.No. 245 of 2010 in O.S.No. 5 of 2003. The revision petitioner/plaintiff filed I.A.No. 245 of 2010 seeking variation of an earlier order of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Addanki dated 6-5-2003 in I.A.No. 23 of 2003, for a limited period, and to permit his tractors also to pass through the suit schedule path way to enable him to transport his cut sababul crop. I.A.No. 245 of 2010 was filed by the revision petitioner/plaintiff to save additional expenditure incurred on manual transportation of the sababul crop through the path way. Earlier, by the order dated 6-5-2003 in I.A.No. 23 of 2003 the trial court had granted interim injunction enabling the revision petitioner/plaintiff and restraining the respondents from interfering with the petitioner’s right of passage for men (and not for carts and tractors) through the path way identified by the Advocate Commissioner which disclosed existence of only a 2 feet wide passage available. Despite the finality of the order dated 6-5-2003 in I.A.No. 23 of 2003, the revision petitioner filed I.A.No. 245 of 2010 to enable his tractors to pass through the 2 feet passage. This request the lower court found to be practically impossible and rejected the I.A. This court finds no error in the application of law or in the exercise of discretion by the Court below, warranting revisional interference under Article 227 of the Constitution. There are no merits. The revision petition is dismissed at the stage of admission. No costs. ________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 23rd July, 2010. GRR