IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CONTEMPT CASE NO : 1267 of 2008 (Contempt Case U/s. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the Respondents herein for violating, disobeying the Order of the High Court dated _______ in WPMP No.________ /WP No. ________ Between: 1 D. Narasimha Reddy S/o. Late Achi Reddy R/o. No. 62, Dovetan Bazar, Bollarum, Secunderabad. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ranga Reddy District, East Division, Hyderabad. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Medchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 4 D. Narasimha Reddy S/o. Late Achi Reddy R/o. No. 95, Dovetan Bazar, Bolarum, Secunderabad. 5 D. Narayana Reddy S/o. Late Achi Reddy R/o. No. 95, Dovetan Bazar, Bolarum, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 P. Anji Reddy S/o. Veera Reddy R/o. Gundlapochampally Village, Qutubullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The JC 3 The RDO 4 Sri Mukunda Reddy Tahsildar, Medchal Mandal, R.R.Dist. 5 D.Narayana Reddy (RR 2,3 & 5 are not necessary paries) .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.SRINIVAS POLAVARAPU Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.S.NIRANJAN REDDY The Court made the following : Form-NIC-OGS/CC{CHP} THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CONTEMPT CASE No.1267 of 2008 In W.P.M.P.No.5812 of 2006 in WRIT PETITION No.4601 of 2006 JUDGMENT: This contempt case is filed complaining that the interim order of this Court dated 09.03.2006 passed in WPMP.5812/2006 in WP.4601/2006 has been deliberately violated by the respondents, particularly by the 6th respondent-Village Revenue Officer in maintaining status quo with regard to the entries to the revenue records as on the date of the said order. The 6th respondent in the writ petition filed a counter stating that he worked as Panchayat Secretary at that relevant point of time and corrections have been made by him alone in the revenue records for the year 2005-06. The said entries have been made much earlier to the order of this Court in WPMP.5812/2006, dated 09.03.2006. It is stated that as per the orders of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Ranga Reddy District, East Division the present Tahsildar, Medchal passed an order No.B/5171/08 dated 06.08.2009 rectifying the entries in the revenue records i.e. pahani for the year 2005-06 in respect of the land in question in Sy.No.540 to an extent of Ac.1.31 gts. of Gudlapochampally village and the copy of the rectified pahani was also filed. In view of the above, I am of the opinion that it cannot be said that the respondents have deliberately violated the orders of this Court dated 09.03.2006 passed in WPMP.5812/2006 in WP.4601/2006. The Contempt Case is accordingly dismissed. It is stated that the entries were made in the subsequent year pahanies based on the incorrect entries made in the pahani for the year 2005-06. If that be so, it is made clear that whatever the corrected pahanies are there for the year 2005-06, the order of status quo shall continue on the said corrected pahanies. No order as to costs. ___________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 07.08.2009 Dsr