.[1]. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1750 OF 2006 IN APPEAL NO.169 OF 2006 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.389 OF 2005 Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., ...Appellant Versus M/s. Eskay Engineer & Anr. ...Respondents. .... Mr.Anup Khaitan, Advocate i/b Shukla & Associates for the Appellant. Mr.V.L.Panjuani, Advocate for the Respondent. .... CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : JUNE 08, 2006. JUNE 08, 2006. JUNE 08, 2006. P.C.: . The contention, as raised before this Court can very well be raised before the Executing Court. In the light of that, we find no case for granting any interim relief. Therefore, as far as the motion is concerned, motion is rejected. [F.I.REBELLO,J.] .[2]. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]