WP(C) 390/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE IA ANSARI Heard Mr. PK Talukdar, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. I Gog oi, learned Standing Counsel, Social Welfare Department. Heard also Mr. B Choud hury, learned Government Advocate, for the State respondents, and Ms. F Begum, l earned counsel for the respondent No. 6. The basic grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition, made under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is that respondent No. 6, who h as been appointed as Aanganwadi Worker, under No. 170 Missing Kathani Aanganwadi Center, is not a local resident of village 2 No. Missing Kathani. By filing aff idavit-in-opposition, respondent No. 6 has denied the allegation and asserts tha t the respondent No. 6 is a local resident of village 2 No. Missing Kathani. It is, thus, clear that it is a disputed question of fact as to whether responde nt No. 6 is or is not a local resident of village 2 No. Missing Kathani, which f alls under Chayduar ICDS Project, in the district of Sonitpur, Assam. Determinat ion of such a disputed question of fact would require holding of roving inquiry and also recording of evidence, which is not appropriate in the facts and circum stances of the present case. In fact, in a similar situation, which arose in WP(C) No. 5864 of 2009, the Court disposed of the writ petition, on 09-03-2011, by permitting the petiti oner to make appropriate representation to the Director, Social Welfare Departme nt, Government of Assam, with further direction to the Director, Social Welfare Department, Government of Assam, to hear all the parties concerned and, then, ta ke a decision in accordance with law. Considering the matter in its entirety and in the interest of justice, t his writ petition too is disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner that if the petitioner feels aggrieved by the appointment of respondent No. 6, she m ay make appropriate representation to Director, Social Welfare Department, Gover nment of Assam, and if such an application is made, the Director, Social Welfare Department, Government of Assam, shall hear all the parties concerned and, then , pass necessary order(s) in accordance with law. If the petitioner feels aggrie ved by the decision, which may be reached by the Director, Social Welfare Depart ment, Government of Assam, the petitioner shall remain at liberty to take recour se to such provisions of law as may be permissible.