1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. O R D E R Bhim Singh Deval Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6575/2008 Date of Order : : 17/09/2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R. PANWAR Mr.N.R.Choudhary, for the petitioner. BY THE COURT: By the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent to allow the petitioner to work on the post of Executive Officer, Municipal Board, Pindwara and restrain the respondents from disturbing the status of the petitioner as Executive Officer and a further direction to the respondent to call back the order Annexure-8 dated 14th July, 2008 and order Annexure-6 dated 4th July, 2008. 2 I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner at length. Carefully gone through the material available on record. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that by order Annexure-3, the petitioner was transferred from Municipal Board, Rani Khurd to Municipal Board, Pindwara on the post of Executive Officer and in pursuance thereof, the petitioner joined his duties at the Municipal Board, Pindwara and has been working on the post of Executive Officer. Vide Annexure-4, the petitioner assumed the charge by submitting the joining report on 2nd July, 2008. The petitioner was given the financial powers vide Anenxure-5 dated 2nd July, 2008. It has further been submitted that by the very same order Annexure-3, the private respondent No.4 has also been transferred from Municipal Board, Sirohi to Municipal Board, Pindwara and by order Annexure-7 dated 11th July, 2008, the private respondent No.4 joined at Municipal Board, Pindwara and by order Annexure-8, he has been given financial powers and thus, the status of the petitioner has been disturbed. On perusal of the various documents placed on record, it appears that so far as status of the petitioner is concerned, the petitioner is still holding the post of Executive Officer and he has not been displaced after joining from Municipal Board, Rani Khurd to Municipal Board, Pindwara on his 3 transfer vide Annexure-3. In my view, the petitioner has neither been put to any financial loss nor has been displaced from his post and present place of posting and therefore, I do not find any good ground to interfere with the orders impugned. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed summarily. However, if the petitioner is displaced by any subsequent order by the respondent- State, he would be at liberty to file a fresh writ petition challenging such displacement/transfer. No orders to costs. (H.R. PANWAR), J. NK 4 S.B.CIVIL MISC.STAY APPLICATION NO.11513/2008 IN S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6575/2008 Date of order : : 17/09/2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.N.R.Choudhary, for the petitioner. Since the writ petition itself has been dismissed, the stay petition also stands dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR), J. NK