PETITIONERS Smt. Premlalta Widow Oprakash Sigatiya, aged about 55 years, RFZSPONDENTS irregularity or jurisdictional error is writ large on the face ofthe record, which . is not in the present case. 4. In View ofthe foregoing, this petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Consequently, LA No. l, application for grant of ad—interim stay, also stands \i‘gisposed of. ‘ . ‘3 Pawan Kumar S/o Omprakash Sigatiya, aged about 28 year. Shrikant S/o Omprakash Sigatiya, aged about 26 years; Rediment Shop, Mahaveer Jeneral Store, Manendragarh Tah: Manendragarh Dist. Korea (C.G.) All are residence of Ward No. 17 in front of» Narayan . VERSUS i WRIT PETITION g227) No. 5117 of2008 : l. 2. 3 . Smt. Asha Devi Widow Murarilal Sanaf, aged about 50 year V R/o Ward No. 16 Manendragarh Tah: Manendragagh Diett; Korea (C.G.) ‘ , Shri Mahaveer Prasad S/o Late Shri Omprakash Sigaoya, aged about 30 years, R/o Samta Colonyrnear Hanuman Mandir Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 GF THE CONSTITUTION OF }NDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K A ”‘ otri J. Present: Shri Rahui Mishra, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Vinay Harit, Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondent No. 3. The petitioner, being aggrieved by the orderdated 13.08.2008’passed by the learned II“ Additional District Judge, Manendragarh, District Koria, in Civil Suit No. 37-A/2007, whereby the application of the petitioner for expert opinion fiied under the provisions of section 151 of the Code oftCiVil Procedure, has been rej ected. erved in the impugred order itself that the petitioner may prove the signature on the basis of other witnesses and documents. After examination of witnesses and documents, the parties are at liberty’to make a fresh application, if any grievance survives. I do not find any illegality in the impugned order and the order is unexceptionable. This Court, in exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India should rehain itself hem interfering with the order passe by the Courts below, except in such cases where perversity, illegality, 2. It is clearly obs State of Chhattisgarh Through: Distt. Collector Korea (C.G.) ORAL ORDER (Passed on 15W day of September, 2008) ‘ infirmity or ,/ Sd/- ,Satish K. Agnihotri i Judge HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR,