Writ Petition No. 591 (SS) of 2004 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Civil Misc. Application No. 5001 of 2005 Heard Sri Vikas Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Paresh Tripathi, learned standing counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the parties have submitted the controversy raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgement and order dated 25.09.2005 passed by this court in Writ Petition No. 236 (SS) of 2000 (Poonam Singh Vs. State of Uttaranchal) connected with Writ Petition No. 1257 (SS) of 2001 (Deewan Singh & others Vs. State of U.P. and others) connected with Writ Petition No. 2039 (SS) of 2001 (Kunwar Singh & others Vs. State of U.P. and others), consequently, the present writ petition may be disposed of in the same terms of the aforesaid judgement. In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is finally disposed of in the same terms and condition of judgement and order dated 25.09.2003 passed by this court in Writ Petition No. 236 (SS) of 2000 (Poonam Singh Vs. State of Uttaranchal) connected with Writ Petition No. 1257 (SS) of 2001 (Deewan Singh & others Vs. State of U.P. and others) connected with Writ Petition No. 2039 (SS) of 2001 (Kunwar Singh & others Vs. State of U.P. and others). Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. 01.08.2005 (M.M. Ghildiyal, J.) S.K.S