1 23.cas1875.10 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1875 OF 2010 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1277 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL ST. NO. 18340 OF 2009 Shri Dadasaheb Kashinath Takawane ....Applicant. Vs. Chandrakant Mahadev Takawane & ors. ....Respondents Mr. Sachin Chandan, Advocate for Applicant. Mr.P.M. Jadhav, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1. Mr. V.S. Talkute, Advoate for Respondent No. 2. Mr. M. Deshmukh, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 5 to 7. CORAM:- GIRISH GODBOLE, J DATED:- SEPTEMBER 12, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard the Advocate for the Applicant and Advocate for Respondents. Application is opposed. However, considering the reasons given in paragraph-3, 4 and 5, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Consequently, Civil Application Nos. 1248 of 2009 and 1277 of 2009 are restored and will be listed for hearing after 3 weeks. 2 23.cas1875.10 Advocate for the Applicant is put to notice that on that date, argument will have to be advanced on the Application for condonation of delay in filing Appeal. (GIRISH GODBOLE, J)