-w &? ^. 4'v; IN THE HIGH COURTORCHWATTISGftRHATBILASPUR M.C.C. N0. /2006 FF.A. N6. 436/19981 ShigI&Bench APRELLANT* ~7 —7' Vinbd Kumar Dixit, aged 48 years Son of late Lal Prasad Dixit. t ' y ^^\y- / .&•" E-2] 3-1 •^/ ^y ^ Raj Kumar Dixit, aged about 40 year Son oflate Lal Prasad Dixit Dinesh Kumar Dixitaged about 30 Years, son of Late Ratti Lal Dixit. All the appellants resident of K.K. Road, MQuij.tiapara, Raipur, District .Raipur[Cffl:]^;;': : , ,:::... . VERSUS ^ RESPONDENT 7 /^lohd. Saleem @ AbdylSaleem, S/Q Haflz Gafoor, R/o near Shiv Mandir, Moudliapara, Raipyr, District Raipur [C.G.] APPLICATION FORGRANTiaRRERMlSSBONTORETURNBAeK THEORl^NALDOGUMENTSFn.EblNR^.NO.^ XI-HC-78 sn^T^iTR-fi* (raTsn^srstiiw ^ fJJV~ ^ H WCff JSIWT^l 3^'<<l<<IO<l,8ITl1*l'l<o, fsldlti^ ^l'.'f. ,'^>. 3.-^?. ^.. ^2004 3l1^?T (lacn (yit^q^ff) SRTOT fffer STI^T 24.11.2006 Shri R.K. Kesharwani, c^unsel for Ifae appUcants Heard. Leamed counsel for the 436/1998 prefen-ed by the appl| vide judgment dated 26.9.2004 taking the additional documents) 27of tfae C.P.C. onrecord.to |applicants submits that the First Appeal No. |icants/appeUants was aHowed by this Court and the matter was remaaded back after the trial Court with a direction to decide the suit a&esh on merits in accordbnce With law. He further submits that Ifae original documents ffled in Ifae be ffled before fhe trial Court Ih view of Ifae above. W 430/98 the applicants in F.A.No. retumed to flie applicanfs after 4 qiKlfcl'fl-l 11HflTtftelA<Rl'KH ^3lf^IT3I1^T filed by fhe appUcants under Order 41 Rule prst appeaL are required by the applicants to anB therefore. the same mav be retumed. application is aUowed. Docmnents fUed by which have been taken on record. be keir a eertified copy ofthe same. Sd/- Bhirendra Mishra Judge P.T.O.