IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3069 of 2005 PREMCHANDRA MAHTO Versus THE CHAIRMAN,B.S.E.B. & ORS ----------- 04/ 07.01.2010 Heard Mr. Arun Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Vijay Kumar Verma, learned junior counsel to Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, counsel representing the Board. The petitioner had filed the writ petition for payment of retiral benefits having retired from the post of Lineman with effect from 30.9.2004. A counter affidavit was filed in the proceedings on 1.12.2009 after service of the same upon learned counsel for the petitioner and in paragraph 6 thereof the details of the amounts being paid to the petitioner has been mentioned. No rejoinder to the statement has been filed on behalf of the petitioner controverting the statement made therein. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)