IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17558 of 2009 1. URMILA DEVI W/O SHRI TEJ NARAYAN YADAV R/O VILL MAHAPARA, P.O.SONKI(MAHAPARA),DISTT-DARBHANGA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH &FAMILY WELFARE, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR -IN- CHIEF HEALTH SERVICES, DARBHANGA DIVISION, DISTT-DARBHANGA 3. THE REGIONAL DY. DIRECTOR , HEALTH SERVICES DARBHANGA DIVISION, DISTT- DARBHANGA 4. THE CIVIL SURGEON- CUM-CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER MADHUBANI,DISTT-MADHUBANI 5. THE IN-CHARGE MEDICAL OFFICER, PRIMARY HELATH CENTRE GHOGHARDIHA, DISTT- MADHUBANI ----------- 2 12.4.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the State. Petitioner’s prayer is for a direction to the respondents to quash the order of termination dated 14.6.2001 contained in Memo no. 1168 issued by the Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Madhubani. By this order petitioner and several other persons were terminated from their service, finding that their appointment was illegal/forged/irregular. Counsel for the petitioner submits that after disposal of LPA No. 946 of 2003 he filed his representation before the Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief medical Officer, Madhubani but that was not considered. 2 The representation was filed by the petitioner in the light of the observation made in LPA No. 946 of 2003 that case of writ petitioners in whose case LPA was preferred by the State as well as other similarly situated persons, who were not parties, will be considered by the Five Men Committee. Admittedly the petitioner did not file his representation before the Five Men Committee, in the light of the observation in LPA No. 946 of 2003 and analogous cases; as such he cannot make a grievance regarding non consideration of his case by the Five Men Committee. Accordingly, I do not find any merit in this application. It is dismissed. Petitioner, if so advised, may approach any appropriate forum which is available to him in law. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.kumar