IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3387 of 2010 DHARMENDRA KUMAR @ SHASHI KUMAR YADAV, SON OF SURESH YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- AMMA, P.S. KONCH, DISTRICT GAYA. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18.2.2010. Heard Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No.6, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, learned A.P.P. for the State. It is a case of mis-use of privilege of bail. The petitioner was earlier granted bail. However, when the case was fixed for charge, he did not appear and subsequently, his bail bond was cancelled. The petitioner remained absent for about six years and finally, he surrendered on 2.11.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in the case, the trial has already commenced after commitment. Since it is a case of mis-use of privilege of bail, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court No.II), Aurangabad (Bihar), in G.R.P.S. Sone Nagar - 2 - N.H./ P.S. CaseNo.11 of 2001 with a condition that on each and every date the petitioner shall remain physically present in court, failing which his bail bond shall stand cancelled automatically. However, if in any exigency, the petitioner feels that on a particular date, he is in difficulty then he will get prior permission from the court only then he can remain absent, otherwise on each and every date, he shall be there before the court and in contravention of this condition automatically, his bail bond will be cancelled. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)