1 S.B.Criminal Revision Petition No.598/2007 Gulam Mohd. & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan Date of Order :: 24th October, 2007 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. J.R.Beniwal, for the petitioner. Mr. V.R.Mehta, Public Prosecutor. .... By this petition under Section 397 read with 401 Cr.P.C. a challenge is given to the order dated 31.5.2007 framing the charges against the petitioners under Sections 341, 323/34, 307 and in alternative 307/34 IPC. The allegation of the petitioners is that no offence offence under Section 307 or 307/34 IPC could have been framed against the petitioner as there is no evidence available on record to constitute an offence for the charges referred above. From a bare perusal of the order impugned it is apparent that victim received an injury on his neck by a gandasi. The injury may that be a simple in nature but the neck is quite a vital part and the assault on that by a sharp edged weapon like gandasi is sufficient to get prima facie satisfied to frame a charge under Section 307/34 IPC. 2 Thus, I do not find any error in the order impugned. The revision petition, therefore, is dismissed. ( GOVIND MATHUR ),J. Kkm/ps.