IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 708 of 2005 (M/B) 1. Ram Pal Singh s/o Late Sh. Harphool Singh 2. Km. Manju d/o Ram Pal Singh, 3. Km. Meenu d/o Ram Pal Singh All r/o Village Mannu Khedi, Police Station, Manglor, District Haridwar …… Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal. 2. S.H.O. Police Station, Manglore, District Haridwar. 3. Ravindra Kumar s/o Late Brahm Singh, r/o Village Titavi, P.S. Titavi, Distt. Mujjafarnagar, U.P. ….. Respondents ……….. Sri S.S. Bhandari, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri D.K. Sharma, Government Advocate for respondents 1 and 2. Sri Anurag Bisaria, Advocate fore respondent no. 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Sri S.S. Bhandari, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri D.K. Sharma, Government Advocate for respondents 1 & 2. Sri Anurag Bisaria, Advocate for respondent no. 3. 2. Sri Sharma, the learned Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by petitioners – Ram Pal Singh, Km. Manju and Km. Meena seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against them now has become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation has filed charge-sheet against the petitioner no.1 Ram Pal Singh before the concerning Court, and as no case worth filing charge- sheet was found against petitioner no. 2 Km. Manju and petitioner no. 3 Km. Meenu, the police does not propose to file charge-sheet against these two petitioners. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Consequently, the interim order dated 07.07.2005 stands vacated automatically. 5. With the above order, CLMA No. 3782 of 2005 also stands disposed of. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 15.07.2006 15.07.2006 A