IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.19076 of 2008 Between: Kasireddy Chinna Krishnamma D/o. Pedda Ragaiah R/o. Thimmareddypalem [V], Lingasamudram [M], Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Principal Secretary to Revenue Department, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2 Joint Collector, Prakasam District at Ongole. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukur Division, Kandukur, Prakasam District. 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, presently Tahsildar, Lingasamudram Mandal, Prakasam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not granting stay order on petitioner's petition in the pending revision preferred against an order dt. 07.07.2008 in CCLA's Proceedings No. BCW1/653/2007 from the proceedings of the Commissioner, Appeals, O/o. the Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, violative of the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Board of Revenue Standing Orders and oﬀends Articles 14, 21 and 300 A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from petitioner's land of Ac.4.74 cents in Survey Number 147/3 of Thimmareddypalem Village, pending ﬁnalization of the revision before the 1st Respondent and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following Order: The petitioner states that she was assigned the land in Sy.No.147/3, admeasuring about Ac.4.74 cents, situated at Thimmareddypalem Revenue Village, Lingasamudram Mandal, Prakasam District and was also granted patta in her favour. By proceedings dated 11-10-2007, the second respondent-Joint Collector, Prakasam, has initiated suo motu proceedings for cancellation of the assignment made in favour of the petitioner for the said Sy.No.147/3. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner ﬁled an appeal before the Commissioner, Appeals, Hyderabad. The appeal was rejected on 07-07-2008. Thereafter, the petitioner preferred a revision along with stay application before the ﬁrst respondent under BSO (18) of Board of Revenue Standing Orders. Now the grievance of the petitioner is that the ﬁrst respondent has not disposed of either the stay application or the revision and pending the revision, the respondents are trying to dispossess her from the subject matter of the land. Hence the present writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. Both the counsel agreed to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the revisional authority to consider and dispose of either the revision or the stay application ﬁled by the petitioner. In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of directing the revisional authority-ﬁrst respondent to consider and dispose of either the stay application or the revision ﬁled by the petitioner in accordance with law. Till then, status quo obtaining as on today shall be maintained by the parties. No order as to costs. ________________ N.V.RAMANA,J Dt:24-09-2008 Usd To 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Principal Secretary to Revenue Department, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2 Joint Collector, Prakasam District at Ongole. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukur Division, Kandukur, Prakasam District. 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, presently Tahsildar, Lingasamudram Mandal, Prakasam District. 5 Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 6 Two CD copies.