^^ € fflGH COVRT OF OIHATTISGARH AT BILASPIJR Writ PetitionfS) No. 1400 of2008 PETITIQNER : Sushma Sheikh W/o M.R. Sheikh aged about 51 years, R/o Taiba Chowk, Talapara Near Dada Bhai Saroy, Bilaspur DistrictBilaspur(CG). VERSUS RE8PONDENTS : 1. State ofChhattisgarh tfarough the Secretary, Department of School Education, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur 2. The District Education Officer Bilaspur, District Bilaspur 3. Tlie Block Education Officer, Bilha, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (CG). (WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTmiON OF INDIA) rSB: HonTble Mr. Satish K. Aeiuhotai, J.) Present : Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.S. Kachhwaha, Dq>uty Advocate General for the State/respondente. ORALORDER (Passed on 03rd of Marcfa, 2008) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly subimts that the fact aod question oflaw involved m the present Writ Petition are the same to that of m Yashwaiif Kumar Bhardwaj Vs, Mmricipal Corpoi'atton^ Dinrg aiid another (2006(11) MPJR-CG 96}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006 aad the order dated 07.02.2007, passed by this Court in W.P (S) No. 697 of 2007 (A.N.V. Satyanarayan & others Vs. State of Chhatttsgarii & others). 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in temis ofthe order passed in tfie case of Yashwairt Kumar Bhardwaj Vs. Mimicipal Corporation, Diirg and another (Supra) and W.P.(8) No. 697 of 2007 (Supra), subject to verification of the facts asto whether the petitioner has acquired B.Ed Exanimation Certificate on his own e^enses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and farther whether he has been paid two advance meremente or not. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Sahu