IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH AUGUST 2008 / 22ND SRAVANA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 208 of 2008(S) --------------------- ------------------------------ ARISING OUT OF THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.547/2005 DATED 19/07/2007 .................... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS: ----------------------------------------- 1. NALINI.K.P., JR.P.H.NURSE, GRADE II, AGED 42, PHC KUMBIDI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. MINI.B.K., JR.P.H.NURSE, AGED 40, PHC KUNISSERY, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 3. JAREENA.H., JR.P.H.NURSE, AGED 45, PHC KAVASHERY, POST PADOOR. 4. LEELABAI.A., JR.P.H.NURSE, AGED 42, PHC KAVASHERY, POST PADOOR. 5. MEERA.P., JR.P.H.NURSE, AGED 41, PHC THENKURUSSI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 6. REMA.P., JR.P.H NURSE, AGED 40, PHC AKATHETARA, POST N.S.S ENGINEERING COLLEGE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 7. MAYAKUTTY.K.K., JR.PH NURSE, AGED 45, PHC ADAKKAPUTHUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 8. ZAFFIYA.M., JR.PH NURSE, AGED 48, PHC CHERPULASSERY, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 9. LEKSHMIDEVI.K., JR.P H NURSE, AGED 39, PHC KOPPAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 10. KUMARI.K., JR.P H NURSE, AGED 40, CHC KANNAMBRA, VADAKKANCHERY. Cont.Case (C)No.208 of 2008 - 2 - 11. USHA.R., JR.PH NURSE, AGED 41, PHC MARUTHAROAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 12. BHARATHY N.P., JR.PH NURSE, AGED 45, PHC THRITHALA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 13. INDIRA.C., JR.PH NURSE, AGED 41, PHC KOPPAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 14. YASODA.M., JR.PH NURSE, AGED 43, PHC KOPPAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 15. SHAKKEELA A, JR.PH NURSE, AGED 42, PHC KIZHAKKANCHERY, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 16. NADHEERA.A, JR.PH NURSE, AGED 41, CHC KODUVAYOOR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 17. SATHYABHAMA.M., JR.PH NURSE, AGED 41, PHC KUNISHERY, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 18. SHERLY C.V., JR.PH NURSE, AGED 39, PHC CHALISSERY, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 19. ANITHA.P.V., JR. PH NURSE, AGED 40, PHC KADAMPAZHIPURAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 20. MAIMOONATH AYAR, JR. PH NURSE, AGED 40, PHC THAMARASSERY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.A.K.ALEX SRI.K.P.SURESH KUMAR RESPONDENTRESPONDENT: ------------------------------------------ DR.K.K.SHYLAJA, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.P.SREEKRISHNAN THIS CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & A.K.BASHEER, J. ------------------------------------------ Cont. Case (C)No.208 of 2008 ------------------------------------------ Dated, this the 13th day of August, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu, C.J. All the petitioners in W.P.(C) No.547 of 2005 being of the view that the respondent has not complied with the orders and directions issued by this Court, have presented this contempt petition. 2. This Court while disposing of the writ petition has issued the following directions. It is as under: “2. It is stated that in the case of similarly situated persons, regularisation has already been effected pursuant to Ext.P22 and P23 judgment. If that be so, there is no point in discriminating the petitioner. There will be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider Exts.P25 to P44 and 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P45 and take appropriate action in the light of Exts.P22 and P23 and extend the benefits given to the similarly situated persons covered by the judgment to the petitioners herein also. It is also made clear that the petitioner shall be granted eligible consequential service benefits. The needful as above shall be done within three months of the date of production of a copy of the judgment by the petitioners.” 3. After disposal of the writ petition, it appears that the respondents have filed a review petition before the learned Single Judge in Cont. Case (C)No.208 of 2008 2 W.P.(C) No.547 of 2005 disposed of on 19th July, 2007. It is also brought to our notice by Sri.M.P.Sreekrishnan, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent, that the learned Single Judge has issued notice on the said review petition. 4. In view of this development, in our opinion, for the present, we need not have to keep this contempt petition on board. Therefore, this contempt petition is closed for the present. However, we reserve liberty to the complainants to approach this Court if need arises in future. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE (A.K.BASHEER) JUDGE vns