IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 25815 of 2007 Between: Sai Prabhu Yuvajana Sangham. Rep by its President T. Peda Booraiah, S/o Venkataswamy, Achyuthapuram (V), Gopavaram Mandal, East Godavari District. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, East Godavari district at Kakinada, 2 The Sub- Collector, East Godavari at Rajahmundry. 3 Tahsildar, Gopavaram Mandal, East Godavari District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue Writ of Mandamus or any appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the proposed action of the respondents in trying to dispossess the members of the petitioner society, from their lawful possession and enjoyment of small extent of lands in total extent of Ac. 60.00 in R.S. No. 197 and R.S. No. 80 situated at Achyuthapuram (V), Gopavaram Mandal, East Godavari District, without following due process of law is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Principles of natural justice and violative of Art 19 (1)(g) and 21 of Constitution of India and for a consequential order directing the respondents to drop all further proceedings including dispossession of the members of the petitioner society from their respective possession and enjoyment of the abovementioned land and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.CH.DHANAMJAYA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner-sangham seeking a direction to the respondents not to dispossess its members’ form the land of an extent of Ac.6.00 cents in Sy.No.197 and Sy.No.80 situated at Achyuthapuram Village, Gopavaram Mandal, East Godavari District. 2. When the matter came up for admission on 04.12.2007 this Court adjourned the matter for one week so as to enable the petitioner-sangham to file the list of its members and the extents of lands occupied by them and also the documents in proof of their possession in respect of the said lands. But no steps have been taken so far to furnish the said information. However, as the Sangham itself is not in possession, it is not entitled to file this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed with a liberty to the petitioner-sangham to file a fresh writ petition consisting of its members. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J February 29, 2008 DSK