HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.21357 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.11.2011 **** Balkaran Deep Singh . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Hemen Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner **** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The grievance of the petitioner is that the amount of Rs.45000/- deposited by him towards fee in the respondent- Institute is not being refunded in an illegal manner. (2). The above-stated claim has been raised by the petitioner vide a legal notice dated 16.08.2011 (Annexure P2). (3). Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, however, without expressing any views on merits, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the legal notice (Annexure P2) served on behalf of the petitioner and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (4). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. CWP No.21357 of 2011.doc - 2 – 18.11.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge