//Sintfa 8®nctr IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISG/RH'AF^ILASPUR (C.G.) 2(C ContemptCase (Ciyil) No..f:»^.,,,./2011 APPLICANTS: / ^\/^/ ^ /^/^ /<y' / A' ,./,^ y/ ^y''A" ^y^-^ ./•"A ^y 3. Atul Pandey, Aged About 49yrs, S/o Late Shri Vibhuti Bhushan Pandey, Presently working as Circle Qrganizer, Office of Block Education Officer, Bagicha, District Jashpur (C.G.) B.L. Saral Aged About 51 years S/o Shri Sonsai Saral, PresenUy workmg as Circle Organizer, Block Education Office, Pathalgaon, Disfa-ictjashpur (C.G.) S. K. Jangde, Aged about 52 years s/o Shri M.C. Jangde, Presently worktng as Circle Organizer Block Education Office, Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.) 4. B. S. Raj Aged About 47 years s/o Shri Samar Singh Raj, Presently working as Circle Organizer, Office of Block Education Officer Mohla Distrct Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 5. ^Manoj Kumar Shrivastav Aged Abauf 49 yrs. S/o Late Shri G. P. }. !f^^':;lBf^^;Se^S^'^^BgB§i'^SSUti2'?? S 1 ' '.'-^^' ^ss^s^sssssa^ssstss^^sSfis&i^^ss^^ Shrivastav, Presently working as Circle Organizer Block Education Office, Pali, District Korba (C.G.) ,6. V.K. Ogre Aged About 51 yrs S/o Shri K.C. Ogre Presendy working as Circle Organizer Block Education Office Podi Uproda District Korba (C.G.) 7. R. K. Baghele Aged About 52 yrs. S/o Shri Rajaram Baghele Presently worktng as Ctrcle Organizer, Office of the assistant Corrunissioner, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ^'•^'Ss'^^^^/.^"^.. ?;°%~F?>^y 8 . A. K. Agnihotri Aged About 45 yrs. S/o Shri R.P. Agnihotri Presently worktng as Circle Qrganizer, Assistant Commissioner (Tribal Welfare) Korba District Korba (C.G.) ESSiS^^^^^S^^^i^ 9. G. K. Mishra Aged About 47 yrs. S/o Shri R.S. Mishra Presently Cirde Organizer, working as Field Officer, Jila Antavyasayi Yojna Sahkari Samiti Raipur Dista-ict Raipur (C.G.) 10; S.L. Dhritlahre Aged About 51 yrs. ^" S/o Shri Begraha Dhritlahre Presently working as Circle Orgardzer Block Education Office Koyalibeda, Dista-ict Kanker (C.G.) 11. R. D. Sahu Aged About 50 yrs S/o Shri R. C. Sahu Presendy working as Circle Organizer Block Education office Pratappur Dist Sarguja C.G. 12. R. K. Otti Aged About 47 yrs S/o Late Shri Maya Ram Otti Presently working as Circle Organizer Block Education office Jagdalpur C.G. 38 ^7§f^^ -a'-ifcat '^^•'S-Ss^^S^^^^^^^^Ss, "S^WWivwaw^SiWJies:W^Wi RESPONDENTS: 13. D. K. Yadav Aged About 50 years S/0 Late. Shri L.R. Yadav Presently workmg as Cu-cle Organizer Block Education office Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Shri Manoj Kumar Pingua, Secretary, Departinent of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Development, Govemment of Chhattisgarh, Manta-alaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Shri Hemant Pahare, Secretary, Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Shankar Nagar Road, Raipur (C.G.) ^ i'" 3.., Shri R. P. Mandal, Secretary, Urban Administration, Government of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) IBt«^Wi^4!!kWitWw6tnfeibW^t%.4s«t!rEE^ .•'WBWfrW^idii.S^HiWaUSi'Btail^RSS!^^ 4. Dr. Anil Chowdhri, Deputy Secretary, Department Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Development, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) PETmON UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE COURTS OF CONTEMPTL ACT READ WITH ARTICLE "2l5 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ^ F? '3'Sf «41<41d'4, ^Tllyis, f^TRT^I; <Tff^t- Cf^A^^ Z1 s/'2^1 "'i'WT: sn^r Tpw (^3^?) an^i^iifeNi •(Wtsn^iaiiiw II^N^ Tumane TOnwafet sii^i SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivafetava, J. ili add 15-07-2011 Shri Jitendra Pali, counsel forthe Heard. This petition has been filed by the of Court order dated 10-03-2010 passed iji orderdated 11-04-2011 passed in Con1empt| Learned counsel for the applicants held that order of the Court was disobeyed take expeditious steps, strictly in accordanc^ further D.P.C. and consideration has not t4 notice was given and no reply is giver) respondent has not taken any steps v'hat) order. The contempt petition was finally d4 |and applicants hgve submitted representatioif Taking into consideration the natui|i lundertaken by the respondents in complianc| iinclined to initiate any proceedings at this ^l time has been fixed by the Court in its order the Court are not complied with, within a re$ be at liberty to take recourse to the remedy the law. With the aforesaid observation, the appficants. °bi^[fl41-( ^liTCft' tf fest <Rn<4l< ^aiRCTsn^i ap()licants alleging willful disobedience W.P.(S)No.2214 of 2008 as also ;ase(C)No.159of2010. sitbmits that even after this Court has directed that the respondent shall with the then existing rules, so far, iken place and even though, legal forthwith, meaning thereby, the ioever in compliance of the Court ;ided by this Court on 11-04-2011 on 27-04-2011. itui|e of the exercise required to be of the order of the Court, I am not ^tage, particularly when, no specific dated 11-04-2011. In case, orders of i^sonable time, the applicants would ^s may be available to them, under p^tition is finally disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge '•--i^ry s,^ ^sfi^f, i—FS/MO—2/20"--1.50,000.