THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 21706 OF 2008 O R D E R: The petitioner was elected as President of Mandal Parishad, Kamareddy of Nizamabad District. The Revenue Divisional Oﬃcer, Kamareddy, the 2 nd respondent herein, issued notice dated 19.9.2008, proposing to convene a meeting of Mandal Parishad, on 6.10.2008, for the purpose of discussing a motion of No-conﬁdence, against the petitioner. A copy of the proposed resolution was also enclosed. The petitioner challenges the action of the 2nd respondent, in issuing the notice dated 19.9.2008. It is pleaded that the 2nd respondent did not follow the procedure prescribed under the Rules, published under G.O.Ms.No.200, dated 28.4.1998. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj. The notice, dated 19.9.2008, issued by the 2nd respondent, is in Form No.4 prescribed under the Rules. Though the prescribed form, in relation to motion of No- conﬁdence against a President of Mandal Parishad, is Form No.5, the contents of impugned notice, which is issued in Form No.4, are identical to those in Form No.5. The principal grievance of the petitioner is that no requisition was given by respondents 3 to 9, as provided for under Form No.2. The petitioner mistook the copy of the proposed resolution, for the requisition in Form No.2. The learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj has produced the relevant record and it contains a requisition in Form No.2, signed by respondents 3 to 9. Apart from that, two of the signatories, viz; respondents 3 and 4, were present and handed over the requisition in Form No.2, to the 2nd respondent. In that view of the matter, no illegality can be said to have taken place, in the process. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ 30th September 2008 PAN