ssp 1 WP 2394 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2394 OF 2010 Devendra Bhagwan Sheth .....Petitioner V/s. Maharshi Karve Stree­Shikshan Sanstha, through its Secretary ..... Respondent Mr.Uday P. Warunjikar with Mr.Nikhilesh Pote, for the petitioner. Mr.S.R.Waghmare, for the respondent. CORAM :P.B.MAJMUDAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE : 25th NOVEMBER, 2010 P.C. 1. Not on board. Taken on board on oral mentioning. 2. The above writ petition was adjourned to 08­12­2010 by an order dated November 15, 2010. Today, it is mentioned that since the matter is already settled and since the petitioner is also present, the writ petition may be disposed of in view of the settlement. The above petition has been filed by the petitioner for getting retiral benefits such as gratuity, leave encashment and pension from the respondent. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has received the dues from the respondent and a cheque of Rs. 6,95,207/­ has been issued by the respondent in favour of the petitioner. The learned counsel for the respondent assured the Court that the said ssp 2 WP 2394 of 2010 cheque will not bounce back. The statement is recorded. The petitioner is present in the Court, who is identified by Advocate Pote. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the contents of the consent terms are read over and explained to the petitioner and his client is satisfied with the consent terms and the writ petition may be disposed of in view of the consent terms. The consent terms duly signed by the respective parties and their respective Advocates, is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. 4. The writ petition is disposed of in view of the consent terms. ( MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )