IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1188 OF 1991 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1159 OF 1984 IN SP.CIVIL SUIT NO.488 OF 1980 Union of India & Anr. .... Petitioners Vs. Miss Navaz P. Anklesaria & Ors. .... Respondents Shri Sandeep Parikh i/b M/s. Bilawala & Co. for the Respondents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: DATED: DATED: JUNE 21, 2005 P.C: P.C: P.C: None present for the petitioners/applicants. Shri Sandeep Parikh for the respondents. Perused the application. Considering the fact that the applicants are seeking to lead further evidence in the form of documents to be placed on record, in terms of the order dated 28-7-1988 passed by the Supreme Court, the application needs to be allowed in terms of the prayer clause (a) and is accordingly hereby allowed. The additional documents shall be placed on record within a period of two weeks from today. The application accordingly stands disposed of. (R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.) (Anoop V. Mohta, J.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1102 OF 1991 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1159 OF 1984 IN CIVIL SUIT NO.488 OF 1980 Union of India & Anr. .... Petitioners Vs. Miss Navaz P. Anklesaria & Ors. .... Respondents Shri Sandeep Parikh i/b M/s. Bilawala & Co. for the Respondents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: DATED: DATED: JUNE 21, 2005 P.C: P.C: P.C: The respondents are permitted to obtain the zerox copies from the records. S.O. to 5th July, 2005. (R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.) (Anoop V. Mohta, J.)