IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP-T No. 3654/2008 Decided on:18.8.2010 _____________________________________________ Bakshi Chand. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. ____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Petitioner has already made representation, Annexure A-6 dated 30.7.1989, for the redressal of his grievance. The same has not been decided by the Secretary (PW) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh. Consequently, the Secretary (PW) is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner by a speaking order within a period of ten weeks after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. In the light of above, the petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 18.8.2010 *awasthi* 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?