IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 25327 of 2008 Between: The Property Association of Baptist Churches Private Limited,Pre. by its Executive Director, G.D.D. Diwakar, S/o. G. Devadhanam, ABM Compound, Kavali, Sri Potti Sriramulu , Nellore District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the District Registrar, District Court Building Compound Nellore, Sri Potti Sri Ramulu , Nellore District. 2 The Sub Registrar, District Court Building Compound Nellore, Sri Potti Sri Ramulu , Nellore District. 3 Rev. Dr. K. Imotemjen Aier S/o. Kariongdang Aier, R/o. Langchang lampur, Mokokchung, Nagaland. 4 Maddineni Sudhakar S/o. Rama Rao R/o. Pldot No. S2, Garden Towers, Brundavan Garden, Guntur 5 Dodda Siva Rama Krishna Reddy S/o. Koti Reddy R/o. 16-5-222, Balajai Nagar, 2nd Land , Old Guntur, Guntur. 6 Gandikota Ankammanayuudu Guantur District. 7 Lammalamadaka Venkata Subrahmanya Sarma S/o. J.S.R. Murthy Door No. 1-36-14./A, Maruthi Nagar, Guntur 8 Kallam Perireddy S/o. Brahma Reddy R/o. 2nd Lane, at Agraharam, Guntur. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in proposing to register the sale deeds submitted by the 3rd Respondent for registration in respect of land in Sy.No.s 71/2B, 72/1B, 72/2B, 73,76,90/2 situated in Nellore Village within Nellore Municipal Limits admeasuring an extent of Ac 9.52 cents in Spite of the injunction orders of the Senior Civil Judge, Nellore granted in IA NO. 610 of 2008 in OS No. 284 of 2008 dt. 2-7-2008 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to G.O.Ms.No. 620 Revenue (Registration-I) Dt. 28-9-2002 and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 not to register the above property during the subsistence of the injunction orders of the Senior Civil Judge, Nellore passed in IA No. 610 of 2008 in OS No. 284 of 2008 dt. 2-7-2008. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.BHEEMA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P. No. 25327 of 2008 O R D E R: This writ petition is filed seeking a Mandamus declaring the action of 2nd respondent in proposing to register the sale deeds submitted by 3rd respondent for registration in respect of land in S.Nos.71/2B, 72/1B, 72/2B, 73, 76, 90/2, situated in Nellore village and municipal limits, admeasuring Ac.9-52 cents, in spite of injunction orders passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Nellore in I.A. No. 610 of 2008 in O.S. No. 284 of 2008 dt.2.7.2008, as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to G.O.Ms.No.620 Revenue (Registration-I) dated 28.9.2002; consequently to direct respondents 1 and 2 not to register the above property during subsistence of the injunction orders dated 2.7.2008. It appears, the petitioner has filed O.S. No. 284 of 2004 before the learned Senior Civil Judge, Nellore seeking injunction restraining the respondents 3 to 8 in this writ petition from alienating the land to an extent of Ac.9-52 cents in S.Nos. 71/2B, 72/1B, 72/2B, 73, 76, 90/2, situated in Nellore village. According to the petitioner, in I.A. No.610 of 2008 temporary injunction was granted on 2.7.2008, therefore, respondents 3 to 8 are restrained from executing any sale deeds in respect of the subject land. But, however, in spite of such injunction being granted by the civil Court, respondents 3 to 8 are bent upon selling the land by executing sale deeds. Hence this writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the considered opinion that it is only on mere apprehension that this writ petition has been filed by the petitioner. Generally speaking, so long as the injunction dated 2.7.2008 in I.A. No. 610 of 2008 in O.S. No. 284 of 2008 is subsisting, respondents 3 to 8 are not entitled to execute any sale deed. In the counter filed by respondents 1 and 2 also, it is stated that no document is presented for registration as of now and as and when such document is presented, the respondents will consider the same as per law. In view of the above, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed and accordingly dismissed. However, it is made clear that if any objections are filed by the petitioner for registration of the subject land, it is always open for 2nd respondent – Sub-Registrar to examine the same and take appropriate decision, as per law. JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU. Date: 12-8-2009. MVB.