IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 5131 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: October 31, 2011 Hansa Singh .. Petitioner Vs. Salwant Singh .. Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Advocate for Mr. Saurav Khurana, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N. Jindal, J The affixation for service of the respondent has been made, as such, the service is treated as complete. Perusal of the order dated 22.4.2011 (Annexure P3), reveals that Vijay Kumar (DW4) and Gurdial Singh (DW5) have already been partly examined and he also wants to examine Shingara Singh Balbir Singh and Dalbir Kaur whose summons have been received back with the report of refusal. Since Shingara Singh, Balbir Singh and Dalbir Kaur had refused to accept service, therefore, the court was bound to procure their presence by way of of coercive methods. Similarly, Vijay Kumar (DW4) and Gurdial Singh (DW5) have been partly cross examined, therefore, their presence could also also be procured in the same manner. However, keeping the delay in adjudication of the trial could be compensated by the petitioner by way of costs of `20,000/-. In the circumstances, the trial court is directed to provide two months time to the defendants and it would apply all available coercive methods to procure their presence subject to payment of `20,000/- as costs. However, it is further made clear that in case of non payment of costs, the trial court would close the evidence by order. October 31, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge