/'.Tt!^ ^ <m COURT OF CHHATIIBGAKH AT_B!L.^PUR W.P.NO. 308/2001 PBTITIONBR 1, Satnaai Sio.gh Paaaag, S/o. Shri Goviad Siagh Paaaag aged about 28 years, resident of R,T.0. Colony, Tikalcrapara Vs. RESPOMDEWTS 2. The Regioual Trazisport Aufhority, Raipur fhrough its Secretaiy at Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Shri Rami Kinkar Mishra, S/o, Shri Ramiiarayaii Mishra, R/o. Saojay Nagar, Raipur 11^^^?^^ f^'—^-^^ WISIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLBS 226/227 OP THE CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Shri B.D,Guru^ counsel for the petitioner. Sliri S.K.Mishra, Paiiel Lawyer for the State. _0_BD^K (Passed ©s&this 1st day of November, 2007) Leai-ned counsel appearmg for fhe petitioner subnxits that with the passage oftiiae, fhe petition has becoine inlructzious. Iii view ofthe above, the writ petition is disraissed, as having becoine nifructuous. —— Suguna Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge