IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13851 of 2009 Between: 1 C.H. Susmitha W/o. Maharesh Now/o. C/o. Badam Apartments, 1st Floor, Chitanyapuri, Ranga Reddy District. 2 C.H. Maharesh S/o. C.H. Venkataiah Badam Apartments, 1st Floor, Chitanyapuri, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad. 2 The Naresh, S.I. Of Police, Saroornagar Police Station, Ranga Reddy District. 3 B. Chandra Sekhar S/o.Sharan Basappa R/o. Flat No.201, T.N.R. Castle, Telephone Colony, Road No.1, Kothapeta, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.KUNCHEAMMAHESWARA RAO Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2: AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: In this Writ Petition, the petitioners have questioned the Police interference with their life and liberty. The petitioners claim to have married each other and that at the instance of respondent No.3, who is the father of petitioner No.1, respondent No.2 has been unduly interfering with their life and liberty. In the counter-affidavit filed by respondent Nos.1 and 2, it is inter alia stated that on the complaint given by respondent No.3, Crime No.823 of 2009 was registered under the caption ‘Woman Missing’. It is further stated that the enquiries of respondent No.2 revealed that petitioner No.2 married petitioner No.1 on 17-06-2009 in the Arya Samaj. He further stated that the Police have nothing to do with the marriage of the petitioners and that they are only concerned with the case registered for woman missing and that instead of sending the marriage certificates and proof of age of petitioner No.1, the petitioners approached this Court. Having regard to the above stand, the petitioners are permitted to appear before respondent No.2 with necessary marriage and age certificates. On production of such certificates, respondent No.2 shall close the above- mentioned Criminal Case. Subject to the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.18101 of 2009 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 21st July, 2009 lur