- - HieH COURT OF CHHATnSGAKH. BIUUSPOR W.P. (Smo. 5741/2007 PBTITIONER D.P.nanik son of Stui Ctimtaram Pamk, agcd atoout 50 years, Sub Engineer, Janpad Panchayat, Masturi, Dutdct Bflaspur (CO) VCTSU» RESPONDBNT8 1. State of Chhattis^rh, Through the Secretary, Dcparfcment of PancAiayat and Rural Development, DKS Bhawan, Maatralsya Raipur (ChIiattisgaA) 2. The Chief Exccutise Officer, Janpad Paocliayat, Masturi, District Bilaspui^CG^ WRIT IWnTIOW UNDBR AICTICLB; 226 OF THB COB8TITUKMI OFIIBDIA Annearaace: Shri P.K.Tulsyan, Coiiasel for the petitioiwr. Shri A.S.Kacbhawaha, Govemment Advocate for the State on advance copy. ORALORDBR (1.10.2007) BOmL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard on admission. The petitwner, who fe working on the post ofSub Enginecr, has bccn transferred finm Janpad PaiKhayat, Masturi, Distrfct- Bflaspur to Janpad Panchayat, Bhaiyathan, District Suiguja on admimstrative grounds. Leamed counsel for the petitkiner argucs that fhc petitioner was previousfy posted at KhDpalpatanain and be has been transferred iGpom the said place to Mastuuri t>y onier datcd 30.6.2006 and thereafter, by the present orier dated 27.6.2007, he has bcen transferred Irom Masturi to Btaaiyathan. His submission is that this is a ftequent transfer. Secoiidfy, he submits that he has worhed for a reasonabty tong period in a reincrte place and again he has been transfcrred to a remote placc. / ^3I?^S-^ W.P.(S)No.5741/2007 ( have beard leamcd counsel for the petitioner at tength. The transfer of the petitioner cannot be said to a ftcquent traasfer, because earlier, frova. Bhopalpatanain to Masturi, hc was transfened on 30.6.2006 and fhereafter, on 27.6.2007, he has been transferred fixitn Masturi to Bhaiyathan. So far as the aiyiiaents pcrtalmng to reinote area are concemed, ttaese are not tbe grounds for setting aside the ordcr of traasfer. Ifa post is there in a particular area, somcone has to go on the said place and it is the disci-etion oftte cinployer to see as to who should be posted on which place. The transfer is an cxigency of scrvk-e and tiobody posted/worldng on a transferablc post can claini for tois posting at a particular place. Unless thc order of transfer is shawn to bc vitiated by inalafidcs or p^sed on extrEmeofus considerations or is shown against any statutoiy Rulc or Act, it canDOt be interfered by a Court oftew, is the settted view ofthe Apex Court. I do uot find any reason to uiterfeTe in the order of transfer ofthc petitioner. The petition has no inerits. The same is dismisscd at the inotion stays itself. Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge sunit^ '.^•-