IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 6352 of 2008 Decided on: 27.5.2011. __________________________________________________________ Mohan Lal Saini. … Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others. … Respondents. __________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. R.P. Singh, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. for the respondents No. 1, 2 & 4. None for respondent No. 3. ___________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral). The writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:- (a) “That the applicant be regularized as Chowkidar in the Youth Service and Sports Department in accordance wit h the State Government policy issued on 4th June, 2004 vide Annexure A-4, as the applicant has already completed more than 11 years service without any break. (b) To quash the appointment of respondent No.3 vide Annexure A-6, whereby he has been selected/appointed as daily wager Chowkidar by the respondents.” 2. It is seen that as per Annexure R-1, dated 31.3.1994, appointment letter of Part-Time Chowkidar was issued to the petitioner by the District Youth Services and Sports Officer, Una. The petitioner submits that despite availability of policy, he has not been brought under daily wages and not accepted for further appointment on regular basis as Chowkidar. Learned Deputy Advocate General submits that the petitioner is an employee of District Youth Board and not to be considered by the District Youth Services and Sports Officer and the grievance of the petitioner is to 2 be considered by the District Youth Board. What is the policy applicable to the District Youth Board is not quite clear. The petitioner may file an appropriate representation before the Appointing Authority seeking the benefit of the policy in Government with regard to conferment of daily wage status to him and thereafter, appointment on regular basis. In the event of such application/representation being filed, the matter will be duly considered by the Appointing Authority and appropriate action in accordance with law will be taken without discriminating the petitioner, within four months from the date of production of copy of this judgment along with copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before respondent No.2/competent authority. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice. (Justice V.K. Sharma) May 27, 2011. Judge. (cr/cs)