IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.8008/2010 IN Pradeep Pareek Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order : 18.8.2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr. Mirza Ishrat Beg for the accused petitioner Mr. Piyush Kumar, Public Prosecutor. ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the perused the relevant papers. In the present case, while rejecting first bail application, liberty was granted to the petitioner to again apply for bail after the statement of the prosecutrix is recorded. Learned counsel has referred to the statement of the Prosecutrix Shashikala (PW1) and submitted that she has been declared hostile. Similarly, he has also referred to the statements of PW 2 Suresh Kumar and PW3 Sriram, brother in law of the prosecutrix and submitted that they have not fully supported the prosecution version. In fact Sriram, brother- in-law of the prosecutrix has stated that when he knocked the door from out side, it was bolted from inside. Petitioner came out of the room and apprised him by offering him Rs. 1000/-. In this back-ground learned counsel submitted that there is no likely hood of petitioner being convicted after trial. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Considering the rival submissions and without expressing any opinion on the merits of this case but taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail during trial. Resultantly, the bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Pradeep Pareek S/O Shri Ram Babu shall be released on bail in F.I.R. No. 36/2010 of P.S. Hindoli, Bundi on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till conclusion of the trial. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. Thanvi