IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7411 of 2010 LALTI DEVI WIFE OF LATE (DR.) MAHESHWAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF B-53, ANAND VIHAR COLONY, AMBEDKAR PATH, POLICE STATION- RUPASPUR, PATNA-14 Versus 1. VEER KUER SINGH UNIVERSITY, THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, ARRAH, DISTRICT- BHOJPUR 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, VEER KUER SINGH UNIVERSITY, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, ARRAH, DISTRICT- BHOJPUR 3. THE FINANCE OFFICER, VEER KUER SINGH UNIVERSITY, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, ARRAH, DISTRICT- BHOJPUR 4. THE PRINCIPLE, S.P.JAIN COLLEGE, SASARAM IN THE DISTRICT OF ROHTAS 5. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECERETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, NEW SECRETARIATE, PATNA 6. THE SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION, STATE OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA ----------- 2 28.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-University as also the counsel appearing for the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that her husband superannuated on 30th September, 2002 from the post of Professor, S.P.Jain College, Sasaram and later died on 11th March, 2007, however still a good amount of retiral dues and some other dues as indicated in the representation dated 05.09.2009 has remained to be settled and paid. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- University submits that the claims of the petitioner need to be verified and only such claims are payable which is admissible under the rules. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Registrar of the respondent-University. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and upon consideration the admitted dues found payable could also be paid to the petitioner along with interest permissible under the rules. However, upon consideration if any of the claims or part of the claim is found not admissible the same shall be informed to the petitioner with reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)