1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 1315 OF 2011 *** 1. Heard Advocate Mr. S. D. Tambat with Advocate Mr. Deokar for the Petitioner/ plaintiff. Petitioner plaintiff filed an application for direction to Respondent / defendant to produce its accounts. Contention is, work done by petitioner is accepted by Respondent/ defendant in written statement and in accounts actually provision has been made for the payment of the plaintiff. The trial Court has rejected that application. 2. It is apparent that petitioner/ plaintiff has to discharge burden put by law upon him. If the Respondent/ defendant is withholding any material document, the trial Court is free to draw appropriate inference in the matter in accordance with law. I do not see any jurisdictional error or perversity. Petition is rejected. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:11/03/2011. ans/1315