1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail Appli. No.512/2008 (Jagdish Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : February 22, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.M.L.Bishnoi, for the petitioner. Mr.J.P.S.Choudhary, P.P. for the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that so far offence under section 307 I.P.C. is concerned, this Court set aside the order framing charge for the offence under section 307 I.P.C. in respect of Bhajna Ram and 8 others petitioners therein in S.B.Cr.Revision Petition No.407/2006 decided on 23.5.2006. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that three accused- persons viz. Rakesh Kumar, Bhagirath and Ramkaran Ram have been granted anticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C. by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dt. 06.09.2006. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application and contends that petitioner has specifically been named and he is habitual in committing the offences of various nature. Learned Public Prosecutor has shown me the police investigation diary, 2 wherein there are as many as 12 cases against the petitioner including the cases of extortion, murder, attempt to commit murder etc. Keeping in view the manner in which the occurrence took place and the fact that while performing the official duty, the police personnel were given beatings by the petitioner and others and the fact that the petitioner is habitual in committing the offence of various nature and heinous nature i.e. murder and attempt to commit murder, in my view, it is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail, on the contrary, in such matters, custodial interrogation is necessary. The bail application filed by the petitioner under section 438 Cr.P.C. is, therefore, dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-