IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN FRIDAY, THE 1ST JULY 2011 / 10TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 12763 of 2011(U) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ ACHENKUNJU, KONKALLIL VEEDU, AYIRANELLORE, PATHANAPURAM TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.ANIYAN SRI.SURIN GEORGE IPE RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERROR POLICE STATION.ERROR.P.O., KOLLAM-PIN- 691 312 2. THE CIRCLE-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANCHAL. ANCHAL.P.O., PIN- 691 306 3. THE DEPUTY-SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PUNALUR.P.O., PIN- 691 305 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM RURAL. KOLLAM.P.O., PIN-691 001 5. BIJU ABRAHAM, KONKALLIL VEEDU, AYIRANELLORE, PATHANAPURAM TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT. PATHANAPURAM.P.O.,PIN-689 695 R1 TO R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.C.M.CHARISMA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.12763/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE ORDER ON INJUNCTION DATED 17/3/2011 JUDGMENT IN I.A.NO.648/2011 IN O.S.NO.110/2011. P2 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT AND ITS RECEIPT DATED 12/3/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO.JUDGE sts R. BASANT & K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ........................................... W.P.(C).NO.12763 OF 2011 ............................................. Dated this the 1st day of July, 2011. JUDGMENT Basant, J: The petitioner has come to this Court claiming police protection. Virtually police protection is claimed for enforcement of Ext.P1 interim order passed by the Munsiff Court, Punalur in favour of the petitioner against the 5th respondent. This petition was filed during vacation with the plea that civil courts having been closed, the petitioner is unable to approach the civil courts for relief. 2. Now the civil courts have reopened. The petitioner now laments that there is no incumbent in office of the Munsiff Court, Punalur. The petitioner is unable hence to complain to that court about the violation of Ext.P1 order. He is therefore unable to seek police protection through civil courts. In these circumstances appropriate directions may be issued, it is prayed. 3. We accept the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the Munsiff Court, Punalur does not W.P.(C).NO.12763 OF 2011 : 2 : have the presiding officer now. But that does not at all mean that the petitioner is without remedy. The petitioner can certainly file applications before the court which holds the charge. If the petitioner makes an application that his application must be emergently considered, his application must be called before the court which is holding charge and that court must certainly look into the grievance of the petitioner and take appropriate action. 4. With the above observations, this petition is dismissed. We direct that a copy of this order be handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioner for production before the court along with his application for action under Order 39 Rule 2A. 5. The Registry shall also communicate the directions to the Munsiff Court, Punalur. Sd/= R. BASANT, JUDGE. Sd/= K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE. cl /true copy/ P.S. to Judge.