‘ARH, BILA$PUR HEGH QQURT OF CHHATFESG Singie Bench: Hon’ble $hri H.L. Daftu, Cd. Writ Peiftion No. i§83 ‘ cf i§§4. , titution of India for issuino a writ d aiso for issuing necessary Petition under Artioies 226 and 2270f the Cons in the nature of Certiorari. Mandamus eto an directions. Present: None apears p for the petitioners. GRAL ORDER S: (Passed on 1 May, 260?} When the ase was calied out for hearing, none appeared nor any c represenation was made on behai oi the petitioners. The petitioners may not t be interested in te matter. Therefor this writ petition ie reiecteo‘ for/non- h e. prosecution. d (2) Registry is directed to sen a copy of this order to the petitioners forthwith. b e (3) Lierty is rserved to the petitioners to make ran appropriate appiioation, if they so desires, seeking revivai of the writ petition. Ordered aooordingiy. Sdl- Chief Justice HM t i Petitmneg's 1‘ MP. State Road Transport Corporation through the Divisional Manager, Raipur Depot, Raipur 2. MP. State Road Transport Corporation through the Depot Manager, Durg Depot, Dur‘g (MP) Vs, Respondents 1i iaie industriai Court, Madhya Pradesh, Bench Raipur: Raipur 2. Dilip Kumar Raiput, EX—Conductor: Durg Depot, Durg Cio Shri KPI Shanna, Advocate, 29/102, Lili Chowk, Raiour (MR)