IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 12668 of 2008. Decided on: 14.7.2011. __________________________________________________________ Ganga Ram. … Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. … Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Nemo. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G, for respondents No.1 to 5. Mr. Sandeep Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. K.S. Kanwar, Advocate, for respondent No. 6. ___________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral). The appointment of 6th respondent, Primary Assistant Teacher, is under challenge. It is seen from the reply that the appointment has been made on the basis of proper selection and the 6th respondent has been found to be more meritorious. It is also seen from the reply that the 6th respondent is also physically challenged like the petitioner. 2. There is no rejoinder. In view of the above circumstances, as the selection has been conducted after following the proper procedure and since the selection is made on the basis of merit, there is no merit in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, so also pending application(s), if any,. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice. (Justice V.K. Sharma) July 14, 2011. Judge. (cr./virender)