.{1}. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.346 OF 2007 Vasudev alias Vikas Vasant Awasthi. ..Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .. Ms.Rebecca Gonsalves, Amicus Curiae, for the Petitioner. Mr.S.R.Borulkar, Public Prosecutor for the State. .. CORAM : S.B.MHASE AND CORAM : S.B.MHASE AND CORAM : S.B.MHASE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : MARCH 26, 2008. DATED : MARCH 26, 2008. DATED : MARCH 26, 2008. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard. 2. Mr.Borulkar, Public Prosecutor for the State reports that as per the grievance made by the petitioner, the FIR was registered and the charge-sheet has been filed. He has stated that there was a counter case as against the petitioner, in which also the FIR has been registered and the charge-sheet has also been filed. Therefore, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. Apart from that Mr.Borulkar also points out to us that .{2}. Departmental Enquiries have been initiated as against the officers who were incharge of the jail. What we find that in the facts and circumstances of the case the Government has proceeded on the proper lines and the grievance of the petitioner is redressed. We, therefore, refrain to entertain the present Petition. The learned Advocate for the petitioner prayed for compensation. However, in the facts and circumstances of the case, it is not a case for compensation because the prisoners have entered into quarrel. Petition is disposed of as such. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [S.B.MHASE,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [S.B.MHASE,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [S.B.MHASE,J.]