IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2491 of 2005 BHUBNESHWAR PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 6. 4.2.2010. Heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. S.S.Sundram, learned Assisting Counsel to the Advocate General, Bihar. Pursuant to the order of this Court dated 12.1.2010, a counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent no.4 on 1.2.2010 after serving its copy on the learned counsel for the petitioner. In para-5 of the affidavit, it is stated that two GPF payment orders were issued from the GPF Office, Munger and pursuant to it, the petitioner was paid Rs.1143/- in cash on 23.1.2010 and an amount of Rs.33843/- was paid vide Cheque No.573046, copy whereof has been placed at Annexure-A to the said counter affidavit. It is stated that the entire admissible amount of GPF payable to the petitioner has been paid to him. However, an oral objection is being raised by learned counsel for the petitioner that he is entitled to some further amount by way of principal as well as interest. 2 Having regard to the circumstances that as according to the respondents, the admissible amount of the Provident Fund together with admissible interest has been made over to the petitioner, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping this writ petition pending and the same is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner, if so advised, to raise his grievance before the respondent no.4 The District Provident Fund Officer, Munger with supportive details and documents and who shall consider the same and if the petitioner is found entitled to any further amount either towards principal or interest, then the same would be paid to him within three months from the date of filing of such representation. If the claim is not found admissible, the same would be disposed of by a speaking order within the same period. The writ petition is disposed of. ahk (Jyoti Saran,J.)