IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.563 of 2008 RANJAN KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ----------- 6. 25.4.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as also the learned counsel for respondent no.5. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ application is that the order dated 28th of April, 2007 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh for release of the vehicle in question in connection with Pandarak Police Station Case No.19/07 is not being carried out. Learned counsel appearing for the State as also learned counsel for respondent no.5 submits that the vehicle has already been released in favour of Surya Bali Tiwary (respondent no.5) pursuant to the order dated 23rd of April, 2007 passed by the City Civil Court at Calcutta in connection with M. Ex. Case No.439 of 2007, as contained in Annexure A to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no.5. Since the vehicle has already been released, no further order needs to be passed. The writ application is, accordingly, now become infructuous and as such dismissed. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)