1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Letters Patent Appeal No. 492 of 2009 IN Writ Petition No. 1393 of 2009 [decided] [Suhas Ratilal Shah & another Vs. Priteshkumar P. Shah] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. S.T. Harkare, Adv., for the appellants. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 21st November, 2009. 1. Heard. 2. Eviction was sought on various grounds. One of the grounds was sub-letting. 3. Admittedly, while scrutinizing the challenges, the learned Single Judge found that the ground of sub-letting was proved by the landlord, and there was no rebuttal by the defendant, who declined to enter the witness box. 4. The fact-finding, which has attained finality at the level of the District Court, and 2 found to be correct by the learned Single Judge, is not shown to be erroneous on account of failure to take into account evidence on record, or being based on any illegality. 5. Other grounds of eviction which are found in favour of landlord are not under challenge. In the result, on all other grounds, the decree of eviction has reached finality. 6. In the circumstances, no indulgence is called for in Letters Patent Appeal. 7. Appeal is dismissed. Judge Judge |Hedau|