- j/v^ ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPU^ w. P. (s) No. q^4 6 OF 2009. PETITIONER cSi- ^y-^.^^ ....-;:;y"-?.J^<1t2t^ :y^ ^ S.Sisl .-••• ^-^^ '«*•*••"' ^6 u"'" 'iuT'ri Smt. Kumud bakhunp'ari, W/p. Shri JL(1-'»'1 . Kamlesh LcddiarLpuri, aged about 24 years, Higher Secondary School Lakhanpuri, Block-Charama, District Kanker, (C. G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1.' State of Ghhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Department of Panchayat & Rural Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C. G.) 2. Chief Executive Officer, Kanker, District-Kanker (C. G.) 3. The PrinGipal, Higher Secondary School Lakhanpuri, District- Kankcr, (C.G.), WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC—78 ^ST •^WWi, ®fl1<1'l6,|s«'11-Hli< ,.W.'.^..C52.....li&..^. sn^r ira^? ('^3^(t) snt^i qn Ki-ii<* "^^ 3T^T S^W^ ?^nwaf?g3n^T ^^rf^t^ ^WV^ ^ I^St •(.f^'^K ^smraaiT^i * 'iSft'fS^'SS.7 'SP: 'S.£.?OT .TTT^a.'TlTri^ S>^TT-7'le'lir'E?J FS.'^S^ EsS^Sf SSn^i^. WSS. l.M-.Sf S'S^S.S. l.y^S^.S.i Shri Somkant Verma, counsel Shri Vivek Sharma, P.L. for the| Challenge in the present p^ 31.7.2009 passed by the respondent ^ is working as Shiksha Karmi Gradl Govt. Higher Secondarv Schoo!, Lakhl Block Pakhanjur, Distt. Kanker. Jor the oetitioner. State. itition is to the order dated t'o.2 by which the petitioner who b-II has been transferred from akhbnpuri to Middle School Bande, Contention of the counsel fo]| aDoointment letter itself it was mentiol tio|-ted that the petitioner would be on probation for two years in the schc|ol where she is being appointed during that period. He further and her ser\'ices are not transferabiej submits that the Shiksha Karrais ar sovernment and therefore the order IW. On the other hand, counsel f' the petitioner is that in her )e not being transfen-ed by the (mpugned is bad in the eye of (r the State fairiv submits that !• the competent authoritv and a representauon before the U be considered in accordance |the matter requires consideration b jtherefore the petitioner may file respondent No.2 and the same wou Iwith lavv, To this proposition of the S|:ate counsel, counsel for the jpetitioner showed his agreement, Ho^vever, he prays for an interim iprotection till the representation of t^ie petitioner is decided by the lauthorities concemed. ^^^. " ^ si!! "£'as^XI-HC—78 ^si '<4l'4ld'4, 0TTl<-i<is, f'.ffiiylj,< .U:^.is-^>.....^^ sn^i^sv (lc<id«!<^) SI^T 'SBT ft-'i* ^rqi 3IRW stiiw THiw^asn^i »-2^_ << a^ a^ Accordingly the petition is i{ the petitioner makes a represeny within a Deriod of ten davs from order, the authorities concemed further oeriod of three weeks from qipiferoh tnwfl'? fe^ TfSRiTt ^; aiRn 3ii^t lisposed of with a direction that if t.tion to the authorities concemed Ithe date of receipt of copy ol' the shali decide the same within a Ithe date ot' its receipt. Till then the order impugned shall be kept in apieyance so far as it reiates to the Detitioner. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge