1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 756 OF 2006 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. FEBRUARY 27, 2007. Heard Shri Shende, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri C.H. Sharma, learned counsel for respondent No.1 and Shri Lanjewar, learned AGP for respondent No. 2. Shri Shende, learned counsel states that Respondent No.1 is already gainfully employed and that statement has been made by the petitioner and recorded by this Court on 9.10.2006. He further states that the pursis on these lines is already filed on 30.8.2006 and along with the pursis, appointment order issued by the Zilla Parishad, Nagpur, to Respondent No.1 on 16.9.2005 is also annexed. Shri Shende further states that the amount of back wages as per directions of School Tribunal is also deposited by the petitioners in this Court and Respondent No.1 can withdraw it. 2 Shri Sharma, learned counsel has some doubt about the correctness of the amount deposited by the petitioners. However, I find that present writ petition can be disposed of by permitting Respondent No.1 to withdraw the amount deposited by the petitioners as per directions of the School Tribunal in the office of this Court. If Respondent No.1 has any grievance about the correctness of the amount deposited, he can make appropriate representation in this respect to the petitioners and the petitioners will, after verifying said grievance, pay the said amount, if any, within a period of six weeks thereafter. In view of this, it is apparent that as Respondent No.1 is already employed with Zilla Parishad, Nagpur, the challenge in the present petition is rendered infructuous. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.