IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 9484 of 2008. Decided on: 13.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Gurmail Singh and others. … Petitioners. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioners : None. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. D.K. Khanna, Advocate for respondents No.3 and 4. None for respondents No.5 to 12. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): A conscious decision has been taken by the State Government vice Annexure P-21, dated 28th January, 1999 whereby the petitioners have been regularised working in six Industrial Development Agencies. This decision has been taken as per the terms and conditions laid down in letter dated 23rd September, 1998. The necessary funds are also sanctioned. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - 2. Since the petitioners have been regularised as per Annexure P-21, dated 28th January, 1999, there shall be a direction to the respondents to grant all the consequential benefits to the petitioners at par with the regularly appointed employees, i.e. provident fund, medical leave, casual leave, earned leave, medical reimbursement, annual increments, house rent etc. within a period of eight weeks after the production of certified copy of this judgment, if not already paid. 3. Accordingly, in view of the observations made hereinabove, the petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 13, 2010. (sck).