..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3069 OF 2008 Shri.Sidheshwar Vasant Bagal. ..Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .... Mr.Rahul S. Kate, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms.A.A.Mane, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 20th October, 2008. DATED : 20th October, 2008. DATED : 20th October, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.183 of 2008 of Sangola police station. The said case is under Section 376 of Indian Penal Code. 3. The prosecutrix has stated that when she was working in the field the applicant pulled her into the sugar-cane crop and committed rape on her. The prosecutrix is a married lady aged about 27 years. Looking to the fact that the prosecutrix is a married lady, absence of injuries on the private part would ..(2).. not raise any cloud of doubt regarding the prosecution case. However, in the said incident the prosecutrix has sustained abrasions and bruises on her left forearm and on the right knee. Thus, it is clear that the act was a forcible act. Looking to the material on record, I do not think that this is a fit case to grant bail. Hence, application for bail is rejected. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)