IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA THURSDAY, THE 26TH JULY 2007 / 4TH SRAVANA 1929 WP(C).No. 13762 of 2007(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ B.LATHIKA, SANGUCHAKRAM VEEDU, BEACH P.O., SANGUMUGHAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.BLAZE K.JOSE RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PEROORKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VATTIYOORKAVU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. PRASAD, VARUVIALA, VAYALIKKADA, VATTIYOORKAVU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. SIVANANDAN, (TRANSPORT CHECKER), MAVARAKUZHI PUTHEN VEEDU, KODUNGANNOOR P.O., VARUVILA, VAYALIKADA, VATTIYOORKAVU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. MALLIKA, VARUVILA, VAYALIKADA, VATTIYOORKAVU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.A. SALIM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMAN & K. HEMA, JJ. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.13762 of 2007 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of July, 2007. JUDGMENT Raman, J. Though notice was served on the respondents, they have not entered appearance and filed any counter-affidavit controverting the averments made in the petition. 2. So long as Ext.P4 is in force and if the petitioner wants to construct a compound wall strictly in compliance of Ext.P4 order, if any obstruction is caused thereto, a complaint may be made by the petitioner to respondent No.2, whereupon respondent No.2 shall give necessary protection to the petitioner. With the above observation, the writ petition is closed. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE. K. HEMA, JUDGE. Krs.