IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL NO : 670 of 2001 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 16/01/2001 in WP NO : 19485 OF 1999 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Kamala Mani W/o. Raja Reddy R/o.Ameerpet, Hyderabad ..... APPELLANT AND 1 Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad Circle-V, rep.by its Commissioner Khairathabad, Hyderabad 2 The Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board Hyderabad, Rep. by its Managing Director 3 The District Collector Hyderabad District 4 The Government of A.P., Rep. by its Principal Secretary Municipal Administration and Urban Development Secretariat, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: MR.V.VENKATARAMANA Counsel for the Respondent No.: SMT.G.JYOTHI KIRAN The Court made the following : ORAL JUDGMENT: (per THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI) When this Writ Appeal is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the Writ Appeal has become infructuous. Recording the same, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. ____________________ Justice T.Meena Kumari _______________________ Justice Ramesh Ranganathan September 4, 2008 MAS. .......REGISTRAR To 1. 2.2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WA {LOBIS}