IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.201 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.201 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.201 OF 2006 IN IN IN APPEAL (L) NO.1351 OF 2005 APPEAL (L) NO.1351 OF 2005 APPEAL (L) NO.1351 OF 2005. IN IN IN SUIT NO. 2750 OF 1985 SUIT NO. 2750 OF 1985 SUIT NO. 2750 OF 1985 The Board of Trustees of the Port of Mumbai .. Applicant V/s Associated Pulp & Paper Mills Ltd. ... Respondents ----- Mr.U.J.Makhija i/b. M/s. Mulla & Mulla & CBC for the Applicant. Mr.Sanjeev Singh for Respondent No.1. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATE : 7TH APRIL, 2006. DATE : 7TH APRIL, 2006. DATE : 7TH APRIL, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Notice of Motion, the Applicant is seeking condonation of 147 days delay. Perused the Notice of Motion and the affidavit-in-support and additional affidavit-in-support thereof. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Applicant. Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause(a). (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)