IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1745 of 2010 1. MD.NAZIR S/O LATE JUDDI R/O VILL BAKHRI KOL, P.S. K.NAGAR, DISTT-PURNEA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE DISTT-PURNEA 3. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER SADAR PURNEA, DISTT- PURNEA 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER UNDER BLOCK- K.NAGAR, DISTT-PURNEA 5. THE BLOCK SUPPLY INSPECTOR/MARKETING OFFICER BLOCK-K.NAGAR, DISTT-PURNEA ----------- 02. 01.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and for the State. The P.D.S. license of the petitioner was cancelled by the S.D.O. on 17.3.2008. Appeal Case No. 65 of 2008 preferred against the same has been rejected on 5.12.2009. The only infirmity pointed out in the decision making process is refusal to accept a recommendation made by the Block Supply Officer, to let off the petitioner with warning. That was merely a recommendation. it did not vest any right in the petitioner. It was for the licensing authority to decide whether to accept the recommendation or not to accept the recommendation. The recommendation was a mere administrative act not final in its own nature. No other infirmity has been pointed out in the decision making process. The appellate order otherwise notices that the allegations were with regard to black marketing of food-grains. The Court finds no reason to 2 interfere. The application stands dismissed. P.K ( Navin Sinha, J.)