IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH MARCH 2010 / 19TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 3947 of 2010(P) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ ABIJITH.V., AGED 17 YEARS, 'SREE NILAYAM', THALAYAZHAM P.O., ULLALA, VAIKOM-686 607, REP.BY HIS FATHER AND NEXT FRIEND VENUGOPAL, RESIDING AT -DO- -DO-. BY ADVS. MR.S.RAJEEV, MR.ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MR.K.K.DHEERENDRA KRISHNAN. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. STATE BANK OF INDIA, ULLALA BRANCH, THALAYAZHAM P.O., VAIKOM, REP.BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER. 2. REGIONAL MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, THIRUNAKKARA BRANCH, KOTTAYAM. *ADDL.R3 & R4 IMPLEADED: R3. P.R. THIRUMENI, AGED 44 YEARS, S/O.RAJAPPAN, PUTHUSSERI, ULLALA, VAIKOM. R4. P.R.BINIMON, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O.RAJAPPAN, PUTHUSSERI, ULLALA. (*ADDL.R3 & R4 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DTD. 24/02/2010 IN I.A.NO.2594/2010) R1 & R2 BY ADV. MR.P.V.SURENDRANATH, SC, SBI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/03/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.3947/2010 P APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE S.S.L.C. CERTIFICATE OF THE PETITIONER. P2: COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF BOARD OF HIGHER SECONDARY EXAMINATION. P3: COPY OF THE FEES STRUCTURE ISSUED BY THE VEDA VYASA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGIES. P4: COPY OF THE TITLE DEED RELATING TO HIS 6.47 ACRES OF LAND SITUATED IN VAIKOM TALUK OF THALAYAZHAM VILLAGE. P5: COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT. P6: COPY OF THE LOCATION MAP ISSUED BY HIS NEIGHBOUR. P7: COPY OF THE CONSENT LETTER ISSUED BY HIS NEIGHBOUR. P8: COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF PASSBOOK OF THE JOINT ACCOUNT. P9: COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF RATION CARD. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.3947/2010-P ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 10th day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T Aggrieved by the delay in getting the sanction for educational loan, this writ petition was filed by the petitioner. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted today that in view of the delay, the petitioner has already approached another Co-operative Bank and the first respondent-Bank may be directed to return the original documents submitted by the petitioner along with the application. For enabling the petitioner to prosecute the application now filed, the first respondent will return the documents on the petitioner approaching the Bank. With the above direction, the writ petition is closed. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms