BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Thirtieth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.12472 of 2011 1 M.JEYARAJ, 2 T.SELVAM, ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO. 1 & 3 Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSEPCTOR OF POLICE, PATTIVEERANPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT CR.NO. 289/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. SIVA AYYAPPAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused Nos. 1 and 3 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147,148,452,294(b),323,436 and 506(ii) I.P.C. in Crime No.289 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned Counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners were charged under Sections 147,148,452,294(b),323,436 and 506(ii) I.P.C. in Crime No.289 of 2011. He further submitted that the petitioners are an innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he pray for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side) would submit that the petitioners and others having wordy quarrel with the de-facto complainant and his mother abused in filthy language and attacked and damaged the articles worth about Rs.2,000/-. He fairly conceded that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital and the investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4.Considering the rival submissions made on both sides, the alleged occurrence took place on 11.09.2011 and they caused damage and the injured has already been discharged from the hospital. Even though the case has been registered on 11.09.2011 and even though they were not arrested and they neither interfered with the investigation nor absconding from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners on condition that the petitioners together shall deposit a sum of Rs.2,000/-(Rupees Two Thousand only) to the credit of Crime No.289 of 2011 on the file https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai, Dindigul District and on receipt of the same, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai, Dindigul District and each of them shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 5. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. Sd/- 30/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NILAKOTTAI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTATE DINDIGUL 3 THE INSEPCTOR OF POLICE, PATTIVEERANPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DT 4 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. SIVA AYYAPPAN Advocate SR.No.34463 ssk/03.10.2011 /6c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12472 of 2011 Date :30/09/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/