Crl.Misc No M- 28914 of 2010 Inderpal Singh @ Vinkle v. State of Punjab Present: Mr.Vivek Salathia, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Manoj Bajaj,Addl.A.G.Punjab. *** Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the directions issued by this Court on 30th September, 2010 the petitioner has joined the investigation. Learned counsel further submits that earlier also a complaint was filed by husband of the complainant against the petitioner and on the basis of detailed inquiry conducted by the police, the petitioner was not found involved and the amount in dispute was returned which was duly accepted by the complainant. On similar allegations, the present FIR has been registered just to falsely implicate the petitioner. Mr.Manoj Bajaj, learned Addl.A.G.Punjab on instructions from ASI Surinder Singh submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and he is no more required. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and and the fact that since the petitioner has joined the investigation and he is no more required for further investigation, the interim directions issued by this Court on 30th September, 2010 are made absolute. However, the petitioners shall abide by the terms and conditions as envisaged in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petition is disposed of accordingly. (DAYA CHAUDHARY) December 09, 2010 JUDGE raghav