IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21509 of 2010 RISHIDEO VERMA @ RISHIDEO PRASAD VERMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 28.6.2010 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is the father-in-law of the deceased and is in custody being charged for offence punishable under Sections 304(B), 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the father-in-law and the allegation as set out in the FIR is of general nature. It is stated that the petitioner has been charged with no specific Act and that one of his son Basant Kumar Verma has been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 19.1.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 758 of 2010, in similar circumstances. Taking into consideration the circumstances set forth, let the petitioner, namely, Rishideo Verma @ Rishideo Prasad Verma be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two 2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur in connection with Bikram P.S. Case No. 89 of 2009, subject to the following conditions:- (1) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (2) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled on ground of misuse. Anand Kr. (Jyoti Saran, J.)