Singia gmm lN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.No 4'é 65‘ /04 PETITIONER /Amrit Lal Gupta, S/o. Chunni Lal Gupta, Aged about 66 years, Occupation — Lawyer and §otary, R/o. Pendra Road (Gaurela), Rest House Road, Pendra Road, Tahsil Pendra Road, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Ea /M‘ ”a W g ”a RDE 1. State of Chhattisgrh, Through Secretary, Law est Legal Affairs Department, Office at DK.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Deputy Secretary, Law st Leal Affairs Department, Office at D.K.S. Bwan, Raipur (C.G.) District ]udge, Competent Authority under Notary Rules, District &I Sessions Court, Bilaspur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. DETAILS OF THE PETITION PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER As given in the cause title. f\ VERSUS ESPONNTS / a . g ha 3 ; 1 amended t0 tive yeai'e wet. “ ~i2—1§9§. i have peruseef euh—eec ion (2) of Section 5 ef the Notaries Act, 1952 whioh reads thus:- “The govemm nt appointing the notary may, ch icatiore and the pteecribed fee, renew receipt‘of an ap the certificate o practice of any notary for a period of five years at a ti. ne.” i XI—HC—7& mam, mm W :§;§;$ WW? @Wm Wm ami WW$WJ§§EE2I§ 21W ; 1 "tcf " 7 w-1-2ag5 W Shri Vishwanath Goswaz'ii. counsei for the petitionei Shr; N. K. Agrawai, eputy Advocate Eenera‘ for the Sia'ze /re3pondenis 1 amd 2. Heard bah ihe coumsei. I The petitioner has prefe‘red ms writ §3eti€ion Lander Arkicie 225227 bf the Cohséitution 0f india queat Onmg ihe Egaliiy, proprieiy and carreciness cf ine wder daied 36—200;- (Amexure—PM) whereby the petitienef’e certificate to praciice as pigbEi netaw has been reeewecé for e pericd 0f Wee years inetead 0f five year . Brief facts leadmg to fring or ihie petitior; are the? the ee‘iirimer ie practicing as Notary a: Pen ra Road, Bxaepur. As hrs; ienarre or‘ ihe certificate in erectice a3 rio ry was expiring, iherefcre, the peiiiiener mevee‘ ar‘ appiicetich before t e compeien’: aiiiheriry for renewal 0f the said ceriifieaie arid vide order dare 3-6~2092 his certificate was renewed fer a peiieci of three years es per ih oid iew and previsiene 0f sub-section {2) of Seeiiori 5 er” ihe ixioiariee eci 4352. Whereas. the said prevision siooci emeiided by the Act 36 0f i §9, whereby the peried of three yeere was LE3 6—78 fL WW WW, $3 W §, Bawe Therefore, in View of ti“ "io practice as Notary ought to k in ihe circumstances, aiiowed. AccordEngiy, ihe p directed to renew the peiiimn gemé of five yearS instead of from which he was enii‘tied for Parties are entitled fat“ c *eraewei of the certificate. e above provisions the petiiioner‘e cer‘iifieate ave been t'enewed for a pefioci 0': = ¢iiveyears. ‘ihe iaetitioner’s peiition deeem’es to be Liiion is aiiewed and the respondemsere er’e ceriiiicate fer praciicing as Noie: é $.or a three yeays with effect frem the originai dare w x ertified copy of this order. WW Eh Vkn‘gwb WV? 2m} 311%?W (Wi<$?§a§g) 231%? T W Wm 3W: WW 1m<% ii fw1W W? WmW _” _ ’q: aim m3 Y” ‘wm‘,