IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 3804 of 2010. Date of decision: 7.7.2010. Raj Kumar ….. Petitioner. Vs. State of H.P. & ors. …. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the petitioner(s): Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents. Mr. R.K.Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 3. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved since his appointment as OT in Government Senior Secondary School, Guwan, District Chamba made by the PTA has been terminated on account of posting of the 5th respondent. It is submitted that the 5th respondent is a regular OT. It is also submitted that there are other vacant posts available to accommodate the 5th respondent, whereas the petitioner cannot be accommodated anywhere else since he is PTA appointed OT. 2. Therefore, there will be a direction to the second respondent to examine the matter and in case there are vacant posts available to accommodate the 5th respondent, the petitioner - 2 - shall not be disturbed. The necessary orders in this regard shall be passed within a week from the receipt of the copy of this judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the second respondent. However, it is clarified that such continuance of the petitioner, if required and in the event of any vacancy available, shall be permitted only in case the petitioner fulfills the required qualification. It is made clear that in the process, Annexure P-2 shall also be taken into consideration. 3 The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. July 7, 2010. (Justice Kuldip Singh), (Hem) Judge.