1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 18/2011 SHESHRAO KANHUJI KHEDKAR AND OTHERS VS. RAMNATH SURYABHAN KHEDKAR AND OTHERS. _____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________ Mr. Prashant R. Nangare, Advocate for applicants. Date : 02nd February, 2011 1 This revision application is made against the order passed by the learned judge of the trial Court dated 12/11/2010 rejecting the applicants’ application seeking rejection of the plaint on the ground that the respondent / plaintiff had not disclosed any cause of action in the plaint. The learned judge of the lower Court rejected the application because the plaint clearly disclosed cause of action. The learned advocate appearing for the applicant asserted before me that the cause of action mentioned in the plaint is false. I am afraid, this submission is not sufficient to allow the application seeking rejection of the plaint. Whether 2 cause of action is false or otherwise would be examined, when the suit would be decided on merits. The revision application should therefore, fail. The revision application stands dismissed. [A.V. NIRGUDE, J.] ts k/