IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 1ST SEPTEMBER 2011 / 10TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 23823 of 2011(C) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ 1. ANOOJA.U., D/O. UNNIKRISHNAN, UMMAPPILLY HOUSE, CHETTUPUZHA, P.O.THRISSUR. 2. AL AMEEN.M., MACHINGAL HOUSE, NARIPARAMBU PO, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SMT.MEDONA LOPEZ RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. UNVERSITY OF CALICUT REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673 635. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673 635. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.23823/2011 C APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE EXAMINATION RESULTS OF 1ST PETITIONER DOWNLOADED FROM THE INTERNET SITE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT. P2: COPY OF THE EXAMINATION RESULTS OF 2ND PETITIONER DOWNLOADED FROM THE INTERNET SITE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT. P3: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER. P4: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. P5: COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF RS.420/- REMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER. P6: COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF RS.420/- REMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. P7: COPY OF THE LETTER SENT BY TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD. ISSUED TO 1ST PETITIONER. P7(A): COPY OF THE LETTER SENT BY TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD. ISSUED TO 2ND PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 23823 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of September, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the 8th Semester examination was declared, they had failed in one paper. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/- [true copy] P.S. to Judge