.^-^^' ^^^^^ ^CM °^-:-S&SK^- ^•••••"»^\^.>:-"" cV-w"...^i'. ~'~l7\^-:" V'<"..^VL ^-l-" ^ese-" "*'" IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. fS) N0. <5^0 / 2011 PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^ Umesh Kumar Panigrahi, S/o Late Parmanand Panigrahi, Aged about 39 years, R/o Nayapara, Asna, Tah.Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar-(C.G.) ^l) State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, Jan Shakti Niyojan Department, Mantralaya, Raipur, Distt. Raipur ^ 2) The Director, Directorate of Employment and Training Wonien's Polytechnic Campus, Byron Bazar, Raipur-(C.G.) r WRIT PETITION U/_A^26_&^27_OP TH_E_CQNSTITUTIQN OP INDIA ^... ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR i'-S'^t. PETmONER WRIT PETmON fS) No. 98Q of201 1 Umesh Kumar Panigrahi. VERSUS RE8PONDENTS State ofChhattisgarh & Another. WRTT PETmON U/A 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Sattsh K. AsnihotnLJ, Present: Shri Prafall N. Bharat, Advoeate for the petitioner. ShriN.N.Roy, PaneILawyerforlhe State/respondents. ORUERfORALl (Passed on 18th day of Febroary, 2011) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks pemussion ofthis Court to wifhdraw this petition witti libefty to file appropriate petttion challenging the legality and validity ofthe relevant clause, which provides for experience. Leamed counsel appearing for other side has no objection. It is ordered accordingly. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforestated liberty, ifso advised. Sd/- SatishK. AgMhotri Judge Amit