IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22329 of 2011 Kumari Mamta, wife of Revati Raman Prasad, resident of village Basantpur Ramni, P.O.Basantpur Ramni, Block and P.S.Warisnagar, District Samastipur (Bihar). Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Divisional Commissioner, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga. 3. The District Magistrate, Samastipur. 4. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Samastipur. 5. The District Welfare Officer, Samastipur, 6. The Sub Divisional Officer, Samastipur. 7. The Chief Development Project Officer, Block Warisnagar, District Samastipur. 8. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Basantpur Ramni, Block Warisnagar, District Samastipur. 9. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Basantpur Ramni, Block Warisnagar, District Samastipur. Respondents ---------------------------------- 02 16.12.2011 The present writ petition has been filed with a prayer for directing the respondents to issue nomination letter for training of the petitioner for the post of Anganbari Sevika of Anganbari Kendra- Basantpur Ramni, Code No.153, Panchayat Basantpur Ramni, Block Warisnagar, District Samastipur. Learned counsel for the petitioner invites attention to the orders of the superior authorities such as the District Magistrate and Additional Collector directing the Child Development Project Officer, Block Warisnagar (Respondent no.7) to take necessary steps in the matter of training of the petitioner inasmuch as no action was taken despite such direction, the petitioner has filed various representations before the said authorities. This is rather surprising that despite orders of the higher authorities the Respondent no.7 have chosen to ignore 2 such directions. Learned counsel for the States is present and has been heard. In the above circumstances, this Court deems fit to dispose of the matter with a direction to the District Magistrate, Samastipur (Respondent no.3) to take note of the petitioner’s representation as contained in Annexure-11 and dispose of the same within a period of three weeks hereof. It is made clear that the Respondent no.3 should also bear in mind his earlier order dated 27.1.2011 (Annexure- 8) as also the subsequent letters of the Additional Collector dated 02.06.2011 and 15.06.2011 (Annexures 9 and 10) and to take appropriate action for non-compliance of such orders as may be deemed appropriate by him in the facts and circumstances of the case, in accordance with law. With the above observation the writ petition stands disposed of. Chandran (Vikash Jain, J.)