IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11766 of 2005 Trivijay Prasad Singh Versus The State of Bihar & Ors ----------- 03/ 18.10.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that in paragraph 2 of order dated 28.07.2011, the work contract vide Agreement no. 48 F2 of 1999-2000 for the work of repair of damage of bank at different points from Gotpa Bridge to Salempur bridge of D.B.C.9.5. mile to 11 mile 23 chain in the district of Bhojpur has been left due to typographical error although it was specifically mentioned in paragraph 7 of the writ petition. From perusal of the records it appears that learned counsel for the petitioner is correct. Hence, order dated 28.07.2011 is modified to the extent that in paragraph 2 after the word „Bhojpur‟, the following words be added. “ and also with respect to the work contract vide Agreement no. 48 F2 of 1999-2000 for the work of repair of damage of bank at different times from Gotpa bridge to Salempur bridge of DBC 9.5 mile to 11 mile 23 chain within the same district.” The said order is modified accordingly. Sunil (S. N. Hussain, J.)