CRLR 134 of 2007 Hon'ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Smt. Mamta Bisht, A.G.A present for the State/revisionist Shri S.K.Shandilya, Advocate present for respondent no.2 Heard learned counsel for the parties. This revision is directed against order dated 05.06.2007, passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate Haridwar in criminal complaint case no. 2640 of 2007. By said order the Chief Judicial Magistrate has directed in a criminal complaint case that District Magistrate Haridwar shall investigate the case under section 202 of Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the respondent No.2 raised objection that the revision against the impugned order is not maintainable. But this court of the view that under section482 of Cr.P.C, this court has sufficient power to pass appropriate orders in the present matter. Learned counsel for the State pointed out that the criminal complaint case is filed against Sub Divisional Officer and relates to his act done in discharge of his public duty. Without their being any sanction from the State as required under section 197 of Cr.P.C, the Chief Judicial Magistrate appears to have passed the order in disregard of the mandatory provision of law. I am satisfied that argument advanced on behalf of the State/revisionist. The impugned order passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar is erroneous in law, on the face of it. Therefore, this revision is allowed, the impugned order dated 05.06.2007, passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar, and the proceedings of the criminal case no. 2640 of 2007, are hereby set aside. (P.C.P., J.) 05.05.2010 NP