IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 12863 of 2004 Between: 1. Sindhura Educational Society, a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act, (Reg.No.3358/92) at Peddapally, Karimnagar District. rep. by its Joint Secretary, Avunoori Mahesh, S/o. A. Vaikuntham, age 35 Years, R/o. Peddapalli 2.Vallem Vishweshwar Reddy, S/o. Dharma Reddy, Sindhura Educational Society, R/o. NTPC, Jyothinagar, Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 All India Council for Technical Education Indira Gandhi Sports Complex, I.P. Estate, New Delhi, rep. by its Adviser (UG). 2 All India Council for Technical Education Southern Regional Officer, 26, Haddows Road, Shastri Bhavan, Chennai, rep. by its Regional Officer. 3 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education, EC Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 4 Commissioner of Technical Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh, BRKR Bhavan, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad. 5 Vivekananda Educational Trust, Main Road, Kamanpoor (P&M), Karimnagar District, Rep. by its Secretary, M. Krishna Murthy, S/o. Lingaiah, age 39 Years, R/o. Pragathinagar, Peddapalli, Karimnagar District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction preferably a writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the G.O.Ms.No.49 Higher Education (EC) Department dt. 12-7-2004 issued by the 3rd respondent as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently suspend the said G.O. and direct the respondents 3 and 4 not to allot any candidate to the 5th respondent in the on-going Engineering Counseling. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.P.VENUGOPAL Counsel for the Respondents : KUM.C.SINDHU KUMARI The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date:17th July, 2009. cs ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRK}