IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 8733 of 2001 Between: 1 Smt.Mahboobee, W/o. Mohd.Moulana, R/o. Gachibowli, Serilingampally Mandal,R.R.District. 2 Smt. Harifa Bee, W/o. Late Syed Ali, R/o. Gachibowli, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R.District. 3 Smt. Zmithunnisa Begum, W/o. Dilwar Ali, R/o. Gachibowli, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R.District. 4 Smt. Afzal Begum, W/o. Khaja Maqsood, R/o. Gachibowli, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R.District. 5 Smt. Puthli Bee, W/o. Feroz Khan, R/o. Gachibowli, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R.District. 6 Smt.Thahera Begum, W/o. Qudas Ali, R/o. Gachibowli, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R.District. 7 Smt. Bee Pasha,W/o. Abdullah Khan, Lr. of Smt. Mohideen Bee, W/o.Fukruddin, R/o. Gachibowli, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R.District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Lak-di-Ka Pool, Hyderabad. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 3 The A.P. State Housing Corporation Ltd., rep.by it's Manging Director, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. 4 The District Manager(Housing), The A.P. State Housing Corporation Ltd.,R.R.District, Hyderabad. 5 The Station House Officer, Chandanagar Police Station, R.R.District. 6 M/s. R.R.Kamdar & Co., rep.by it's Managing Partner Anil Kumar Kamdar, Nampally , Hyderabad. 7 M/s. Kastopah Corporation, rep.by it's Managing Partner Anil Kumar Kamdar. Nampally , Hyderabad. R6 and R7 impleaded as per court order dt.21.8.02 in W.P.M.P.No.12554/02. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners: Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is ﬁled for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated above and also in the interests of justice, the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to return the original patta certiﬁcates to us and also direct the respondents to see that the houses are constructed to the patta holders and consequently direct the respondents, particularly respondents 2 & 5 not to dispossess the patta holders and not to allow other third parties to raise construction in the land that was allotted to the petitioners and other patta holders”. At the hearing, Sri G.Siva Rama Krishna Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri T.P.Acharya, learned counsel for the petitioners, stated that the petitioners have taken away the file from Sri T.P.Acharya. As no alternative arrangements have been made by the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition for non- prosecution, interim order dated 25-04-2002 is vacated. WPMP No.1111 of 2001 is dismissed and WVMP No.1440 of 2002 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 9th September, 2008 vrn