1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINALCIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 913 OF 2008 Vishwanath Muneshwar Yadav ..Petitioner versus Yogiraj Shrikrishna Vidyalaya and Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Rahul Walia for Petitioner. Ms. Sindhu Shreedharan, AGP for Respondent Nos. 3 to 5. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & A. A. SAYED , JJ. DATED : 6TH MAY, 2010. P.C. The petitioner has taken out a motion. However considering that the petitioner was a pensioner and the controversy being limited by consent of the parties, the petition is taken up for final disposal. 2 The petition raises a short question as to whether the petitioner is entitled for having his service continued for period 28-3-1992 and 26-3-2004 for the purpose of computing the pensionary benefits and other terminal benefits. 2 3 The petitioner was suspended on 28-3-1992 and his services came to be terminated on 30-4-1992. The order of termination was withdrawn on 12-10-2001 and the petitioner was reinstated on 26-3-2004. Considering that the petitioner has been paid full back wages including for the period of suspension the period between 28-3-1992 and 12-10.-001 and 26-3-2004 has to be counted for the purpose of pension and for other terminal benefits. 4 In the light of that Rule made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) with no order as to costs. The Management is directed immediately to forward the necessary pension papers within one month from the petitioner serving a copy on the management to the concerned department for processing the same and pension be released not later than 4 months from the receipt of the papers as also any other terminal benefits if not paid. The copy of the order be served by the petitioner on the Management. ( F.I. REBELLO, J.) ( A. A. SAYED, J.) 3