IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13370 of 2010 1. MD.NASIM S/O MD.ABBAS R/O VILL.- DEHTI YOGJANBHAG, P.S.- PALASI, DISTT.- ARARIA Versus 1. THE STAE OF BIHAR THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR PRIMARY EDUCATION PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE ARARIA 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION ARARIA 5. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER PALASI DISTT. ARARIA 6. THE MUKHIA GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ DIGHALI BLOCK + P.S.- PALASI, DISTT.- ARARIA 7. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ DIGHALI, BLOCK & P.S.- PALASI, DISTT.- ARARIA ----------- 02. 13.4.2011 At the instance of the person who had filed the case before the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority and at whose behest the present order contained in Annexure-1 has been passed has not been made party to the writ application. Obviously the present writ application cannot be maintained in absence of the necessary party having been impleaded in the writ application. The Court has noticed that in a large number of writ applications petitioners do not implead the necessary party and they want an order in their favour without others being heard. Whether it is being done on purpose or otherwise is not required to be answered by this Court. Writ is dismissed on that ground alone. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)