IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1445 of 2010 LAL BABU RAI @ LALOO RAI, S/o Late Sahay Rai. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 28.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. From the First Information Report it appears that an occurrence took place on 13.06.2009 when the deceased, Umakant Shukla accidently caused hurt to one Chhaju Mahto due to which the deceased who was the driver on the vehicle was variously assaulted and sustained injuries. Thereafter on 23.06.2009 the deceased was once again assaulted allegedly by the petitioner and two others. However, the informant is not an eye-witness to the occurrence and from the impugned order it appears that there were two injuries on the person of the deceased which is not specifically attributed to the present petitioner. In view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named who is in custody since 26.08.2009 and - 2 - has no criminal antecedent be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, (West) Muzaffarpur in connection with Karja P.S. Case No. 75 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)