1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4588/2010 Vijaykumar A.Patil and Ors. ..Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ..Respondents Mr.Nagesh Chavan for Petitioner. CORAM : D. D. SINHA AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : JUNE 16, 2010. P.C. : . Heard counsel for the petitioners .The only prayer made by the petitioner is that direction be given to respondents 2 and 3 to decide the proposal of the petitioner for sanctioning the lay out plan no.8 dated 31st July,2009 in accordance with law and procedure applicable in this regard. 2] Normally without notice to the respondents this Court would not have shown indulgence , however, since the proposal of the petitioners is required to be decided according to law on merits by respondents 2 and 3 we see no reason why said direction cannot be 2 given in absence of notice to the respondents. 3] In the circumstances the Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with direction to respondents 2 and 3 to decide the proposal of the petitioner dated 31st July,2009 , if not decided earlier, in accordance with law and procedure applicable in this regard at the earliest. (D. D. SINHA, J.) (MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.)