C^?:^ /274-A^ B^paE •TSB M.P. SSATE A%IINiaRAmI7E "BIBOTAl.BEtTCS Am JABAEpm OrlginalAppllcaUon No.G1^2-./'9.996 Applican*®- ss AAok Goy^l, ag6d a/boai;31 years. s^o 1 Shrl Murartlal fioyal, By •Occnpa'fcioa ; .',; . 'Ry.' aiperin-tendant of Folice, presently;f|j pos-fcea as Sab Divislonal GStieex (pQiaieei . Sananaj gas.j, Tdstriet ! ' Sargaja ••(KE)«y:;|?3 •li sa:•j Tersus if!?:i- Non-apBlicants s sl. mhe Stete of M.P. •fcba'oaj^i -fehe : : ^ SecTetary Ge'Temmea't of M'5* Home " ' (police),-I)epar1ment» V'allatfe Bhawan Man-fcraIaya.Bhopal. 1: 2. 3he Mrector Ggneral of Poll.ee, iPolice Headqu^-ber, Bhopal (MlO . 1; i • iIBil ::i)l AEPUOASTGN' •(jmM SECSIW 19 ® SE ADMINI32BAT%. SICTBONAl.S &em,'1985_i , . ' ai- M:1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition (Sl No. 1274 of2005 Petitioncr Ashok Goyal Versus Respondents Thc State of M. P. (now Chhattisgarh) & aaother (SB: Honlale Sbri Satish K. AgnihotdJ.) None for the petitioner. Shri N. N. Roy aad Shri A. V. Shridhar, Panel Lawyers for the respondente/ State. 1. O RD B R (oralt ( Passed on this 13th day ofNovember, 2009) The matter is catled for heariug twice. On bofh the occasions noue appears nor any representation is made on bchalfof the petitioner. The petitioncr may not be interested ia prosecutii^ the inatter. In view of fhe foregoiag, the petition is disiiussed for want of prosecution. A copy oftfais order sfaaU be sent to fhe pctitioncr forthwith. 2. Tfaalau