IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN TUESDAY, THE 26TH MAY 2009 / 5TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 13514 of 2009(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- AYOOB, S/O. YOUNIS, VELAMKUZHIYIL, NILAMEL VILLAGE, KANNANKODE, KOTTARAKKARA. BY ADV. SRI.SIBY MATHEW RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHADAYAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, KOLLAM. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KADAKKAL, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, KOLLAM. 3. AITUC, HEADLOAD & TIMBER WORKERS UNION, PALLIKUNNUPURAM, CHADAYAMANGALAM, KOTTARAKKARA. ADV. SRI.ANCHAL C.VIJAYAN FOR R3 GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.A. SALIM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) 13514/2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF AGREEMENT DATED 6.5.2009 ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND ABDUL SHUKKOOR. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF AGREEMENT DATED 6.5.2009 ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND HASHIM. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF AGREEMENT DATED 6.5.2009 ENTERED ITO BETWEEN THE PETITIOENR AD SOMARAJAN. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF AGREEMENT DATED 19.4.2009 ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND UNIONS VIZ. CITU, INTUC & BMS. EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 24.4.2009 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: EXT.R3(a) TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE SSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER, CHADAYAMANGALAM DATED 26.3.2009 TO THE TRADE UNIONS OF KURIODU, CHADAYAMANGALAM. // TRUE COPY // KNC/- P.S. TO JUDGE. P.R.RAMAN & P.BHAVADASAN, JJ. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.13514 of 2009 ------------------------------- Dated this the 26th May, 2009 J U D G M E N T Raman, J. The petitioner is engaged in the business of slaughter tapping of rubber trees, after purchasing the same from the respective owners, and it was sold to various customers at Kollam and Perumbavoor. The work connected with loading and unloading is done through workmen belonging to various unions. It appears that third respondent has raised a claim against the petitioner for not engaging their workmen along with the workmen engaged from other unions. 2. However, pursuant to the notice issued, the parties have amicably settled the disputed. It is agreed that one workmen from the third respondent Union will also be engaged along with the workmen from other unions. The same is recorded. Hence, there cannot be any further obstruction caused W.P.(C) No.13514 of 2009 2 by the third respondent subject to the above agreement, and if there is further obstruction caused, police will interfere and afford necessary protection. The writ petition is disposed of as above. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE P.BHAVADASAN , JUDGE. nj.