PETETIQNER Kishzm Tandon Krami Aged about 40 years S/o Shri R.K.Tandon OfEice of the Dis’u-ict Women 8c Child Beveiopmeii-t Officm; Kawardha District Kabirdham (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS . State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Depamnem’ 0f WOmen amd Chiki Dévelopmem Ssciai Welfare DKS. Bkawan, Mantralaya Raipur (Chhattiseayh) Commissionen Wcmen & Child Development Directora‘ie Raifmr (Cilhmisgarh) 3. 4‘ WRET PETI‘TTGN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Ema’Ee Shri Sa§ish K. A'mihotl‘ia J. Fresem: b} ‘i Jitendm Pall. Advocate for the petltloner. k) Collector District Kanker (Cimattisgarh) District Progranmae Officer Womexl and Child Development Kanker (Clajmtiisgarh) Smt. Smita Glmi; Panel Lawyer for the Siate/responde:1is. GRAL GRDER’ (Passed on 25m (jay of February, 2009) J2. U) * Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to comes: this petition on merits at this stage. However, he seeke a direction to the respondent~authorities {o consider and decide hi3 peading represeritatioos (Amiexure PES colly.) as expeciitiousiv as possible. TLearned counsel appeai‘mg for Elie Slatel'respondems subm13ts thai' if the i‘e-pi‘esentatiens are pending considemtion with regafd it; grant of Subslstence allewaace: file same shall be cansidered and decided in aceoréance with law 031 itS owe merits, within a perioo of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this erdey. Further; in :he evem, if the peti’iiener émends to file a fresh representatioa, the same shai} also be oousiéered Witliiii the aforesaid period from the ciate of receipt of a copy ofthe representation. in view ofthe fore going; according to learned couns el appearing for the petitioner, nothing remains to be adjudicated. Accordingiy: the petitiori steeds disposed of. No order asto costs. {Jonsequentiyg sending applicatioris, if any, aiso stand disgioseci of. / sdl" Sal‘s“ Judge 7 e HIGH COURE“ OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETETION i To. 2642 ot‘2005 /