wp9331.10 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.9331 OF 2010 1) Dr. Daulatrao Bhimrao Gadhe, R/o At Post-Warud (Kh.), Tq-Jafrabad, Dist-Jalna, 2) Sau. Vijaya Manikchand Tapadiya, R/o-Sadhana Apartment, Raja Bazar, Tq. & Dist- Aurangabad. ...PETITIONERS. VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary for Department of Cooperation and Textile, Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032, 2) The Commissioner for Cooperation and Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Maharashtra State, Pune, 3) The Additional Registrar (V & N), Cooperative Societies, M.S. Pune, 4) The Maharashtra Rajya Sahakari Sangh Limited, 5, B.J. Road, Pune 411 001, Through its Chief Executive Officer. ...RESPONDENTS. wp9331.10 2 ... Shri.Deelip Bankar Patil Advocate h/f. Shri. P.B. Salunke Advocate for Petitioner. Shri. V.D. Godbharle, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Shri.P.K. Joshi Advocate for Respondent No.4. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE : 7TH JANUARY, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Enquiry under Section 78 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 is initiated against the Petitioners. It is the grievance of the Petitioners that copies of some documents are not supplied to the Petitioners. 3. We observe that if the copies of the documents are not supplied to the Petitioners, the inspection of the same be given to the Petitioners and copies of the documents be supplied to the wp9331.10 3 Petitioners. By Judgment and Order dated 16th August, 2010 delivered in Writ Petition No.7059 of 2010, the Division Bench of this Court (CORAM: P.V. HARDAS & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ.) had granted 15 days protection for availing alternate remedy, in case an adverse order is passed against the Petitioners. 4. We have perused the relevant record placed before us. We find that under the orders passed in this Petition, by this Court (CORAM: B.R. GAVAI & A.A. SAYED, JJ.) dated 6th October 2010, the proceedings before Respondent No.3 were stayed. We observe that the proceedings before Respondent No.3 need not be stayed. The Petitioners have efficacious remedies, in case any adverse order is passed and even if adverse order is passed, the Petitioners are protected under the orders passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 7059 of 2010. In this view of the matter, no interference is called for in exercise of our wp9331.10 4 extra ordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Writ Petition is dismissed. . Authenticated copy of this order be supplied to the learned A.G.P., who will immediately forward the same to Respondent No.3. [S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] asb/JAN11/wp9331.10