1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2364 OF 2009. IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2009. DEEPAK S/O BALIRAMJI DANDEKAR VS SHAMRAO S/O LAXMANRAO HEDAO ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri A. K. Rewatkar, Advocate for the applicant. CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 25th JUNE, 2010. 1. Heard learned Advocate for the applicant- appellant. 2. Perused the judgment. 3. This is an application for leave to file an appeal. 4. The learned Trial Judge has ordered acquittal on the ground that the memo of dishonour of cheque was not proved as it did not bear the signature of anybody. 5. Since the fact of dishonour was not proved, the learned Magistrate has held that there was no cause of 2 action for filing complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, as no offence was shown to have been committed. 6. This Court finds that there are no grounds for interference as no error is shown. 7. Appeal has no merit and is dismissed. Judge //mule//