's ^ ••:? ;'%^' ^''l'.:7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BIIASPUR, SINGLE BENCH NO.?2L~J/^-OF Anjam Kumar, S/o Late Shri ^- Ajiirudha Prasad, aged about 53 ..•• years, pressntly posted and ^ Afr^ ••<• working as StatT Officer ('Civil), '!^^'V"{ ••••"' South Eastem Coalfields Ltd., Ar^n Pn<;t — D?i R ^s, ^y^'^y 5>-'^su' ...:-'' v^"" Sohagpur Area, Post - Dhanpuri, Distt Shahdol (M.P.) •S-''I6>T'~i~) '^^s^ ''•<s.-".''?j'a?''" ••' ••V. '^s^'. 1. South Eastem Coalfields Ltd. through C.M.D., Headquarter at Bilaspur (CG). 2. The General Manager ('Civil). South Eastem Coalfields Ltd.. T-^ Headquarter at Bilaspur (CG) 3. The Chief General Manager. South Eastern Coalfields Ltd, Sohagpur Area, Post - Dhaapua Distt Shahdol (M.P.) 4. The General Manager. South ,.. Eastern Coalfields Ltd, Bhatgaon Area, Distt Surguja (CG) 5. The Dy. General Manager (P& C), South Eastem Coalfields Ltd, ^'"" Bilaspur (CG) 6. Mr. D. R. K. Singh, Dy. Chief Engineer (Civil), posted as Staff Officer (Civil), Bhatgaon Ai-ea, Distt Surguja (CG) tf' WTUT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE :ONSTI XI-HC-78 sn^r^rf^iN; (I8IT3<1^<1 sn*(i* ^ 3^^'IPTRra', ®Tn«'ie,fsiciltiy *ii*<ni a»*iic»»t^! lAV^. W[ 200 3ii^i laqi (l?i(3<!islsi) SRiRiTflfersn^T 13.6.2006 Shri 8.0. Guru. Advocott' Hsard. On tha iast date of ht Advocate appeared on behaij week time to aeek instructiorl called, Or. Shukla is not pres^ The main grievsnce roij vias orde," datsd 26.7.200^ Orficer (Civii), 5ECL, Sohagpt 30.7.2005 vide Annexur®P-1 duties as Staff Offieer (Ci been confirmed on The said P-4} cand sincs thsn he was wl or- interruption. To the utt^ vids impugned order dated hss besn oostsd as Staff 0|] of rhe fac' Th.ar The Detitionti ^,(9^6^ <> and no furtherfhaa bean onsstd Learned counsei for this petition respondent N0.4 ssat of ths peti+ionsr and =i)i<ifii41-f 'ii*«iTffrsx'l<Ri<ei< ^si^irsn^r •e for' the petjtioner. L^. Q*I 5.6.2006 br*. N.K. Shukla, Sf. F of The respondenT-SECL cnd souoht one- b in the matter. Today', when the nnatter is •m. sea' by the petiticne" in this petition is that (,4i"n®^u"s P-2) he was postsd as Staff ur Area. he took the charae of said oost on i ana 0,3 the Dctitioner was diaehat-ainfl hu yi!) efficientiy, •riier^fore, his posting has 30ST vide order daTed 6.10.200S (Annexure »rkingon that post without a-iy diStjrbancs sr- surDfise of the oetitioner aii of sudden 19.5.2006 (Annexurs P-i) respondent No.6 fficer (Ciyii), SECL, Soha9pu.r Araa in spite ;r is airefldy holding The charge of That post 2d in I'esoect of the oetitioner's oostina. petjtioner submitted that afTer filing of , in absence of tne petitioner, occupied the stcsrtsd dischcsrging ths dutiss of Staff XI-HC-78 3^'-:^rai?ra', ®Tny<o,IsiMiuy *n*KtT Sh*11<*> ^ 200 3<i^i 4a«t»(lic<fj<!l<^sr) sn^rgirf^iR; (raraii^i sbii* s^nw^a'wi^r <ni<itii<l1i Hi*«iTffte^<Ri*di< ^si^iTsn^r Roshan/' junsprupsnce Officer (Civii) snd no ordsr| assignment of work to the pe-l known to the service jurispru guch a si+uation fhe petitioner| the higher auThorities an^ repr-esentation (Annexure P-] ^jlaspur and al-so sent a copy 4 order has been passed on that "espondent No.l ba dirsctetj oetitjoner ond DOSS the orders In the cireumstanees, has bsen passed reaar'ding postmg or fitionet'. which has created a situation not ^isnce. Hs further submits tnat against wss laft with no aitsr'RQtive but to move accordingiy the petit'ioner made a p) to the Director (Personiiel), SECL, If same- to re.spondent No.l, but so far no L Therefore, in order To ciear the ciouds to dsciae ths ,"eD."ssantation af the n accordanee wifh law. resDondent No.l 'iS direeted to deeid® yt&Qyt&.s^y\'tfi'T!Qn QT T^S DeTi'nionsi sccordance wim iaw wiTiitn a oe> With Itie direction aforebai. QS\Q ^ass QppropniTo; oraer's in •iod of two weeks frorr, T-oday. ^aid. ths Dstitio," stands disoossd of. Consequentiy, M.(W.)P. t\ Certifiea' copy as psr rui^ o.2052/06 aiso stands^jsposed of. s- Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge