IN THE H1GH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH ATBILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. I § 9 /200:7 WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIAT PETITIONER ' K‘ \r/ Ganesh Ram Pradhan, aged about 47 years, son of Late r Dhan Sai Ram Pradhan, Assistant Teacher, v ’ Government Girls Primary School Jashpur Nagar, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) q?“ gay VERSUS - w " » w d Q‘G 0.5x“ 8% PONDENTS ('1. State of Chhatt1sgarh, through — ‘ Secretary, Department of School Education, Dau‘ Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ,/2. The District Education Officer, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI$GARH AT BILASPUR w, us) No. 117 of 2007 Pefi'fioners : Mmsingh Khande and o‘thzrs Versus Respondents i State of Chharrisgarh and afhers w‘ P,(5) No‘ 118 of 2007 Pefi'tioners : Tejram Bhagnt and ofhers Versus Respondenw : State of Chhnttisgarh and others w, P,($) No. 121 of 2007 smjay num- 5mm Petitioner Versus Mondants : State of Chhattisgarh Md another W, P,(S) No, 126 of 2007 W, P.($) No, 127 of 2007 Petitioner : Kulranjan Ekka Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and others W, P,(5l No, 128 of 2007 Petitioner : Sm‘i’. Bhar‘ti Bai Versus Respondents 2 State of Chhattisgarh and another W, P,($) No, 129 of 2007 Petitioner : Philos Akdmay Mukut Tigga Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and mother W, P,(_$) No. 130 of 2007 ’ Petitioner : Smt. Prasadi Bhagot Versus mondents : State of Chhattisgarh and another Petitioner : Bhuvnedwwar Pmsad Pmdhan Versus Respondents z State of Chhattisgarh and others W. P.(5_) No; 131 of 2007 ' Sagar Sci Versus Petitioner Responderws 2 State of Chha‘tfisgarh and o‘rhers \ W. P.($) No, 133 of 2007 Pe111‘ioner : Inus Bek Versus Rewondents : State of Chhattisgarh and another W. P.(S) No. 134 of 2007 Petitioner : Balirom Bhagat Versus Respondents : State of Chhottisgarh and another w, us) No. 135 of 2007 Petitioner : Avinash Chandra Xalco Versus Respondents : State of Chhottisgarh and others w, us) No. 136 of 2007 Petitioner : Smt. Shashikola Bhagat Versus Respondents 2 State of Chhattisgarh and mother W, P',(S) No. 137 of 2007 Petitioner : Chhondurom Bhagat Versus Re¢ondents : State of Chhattisgarh and another W. P,(5) No, 139 of 2007 Petitioner : Ku. Clementina Tigga I Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and another W. P.(5) No. 145 of 2007 Petitioner : Kridma Ram Patel Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and others W. P,(S) No, 147 of 2007 Versus Versus Pefifioner : Laxmimmyan Patel Versus Rzspondenfs : - Shh of Chhaftisgarh and ano‘fher W, P.(5) No. 149 of 2007 ’7 Petitioner , : Sm‘r. Maxi Miliyani Toppo Versus Respondzms : 51am of Chhaffisgnrh and another k W. P,($) No, 150 of 2007 xPe1'i‘rioner : Smt. Rnjmohi Rewondem's : Sm‘te of Chhuffisgarh and others W, P,($) No. 151 of 2007 Petitionzr : Chomru Rom Nogdeo Respondenfs : Sfo‘te of Chhn‘tfisgorh and afhers W. P.(5) No. 159 of 2007 Pe‘l‘i‘l’ioner : Gonedm Ram Prodhan Versus Rewonden'rs : Sfo‘l’e'of Chha‘l’fisgorh and mo‘ther W. P.(S) No. 161 of 2007 Petitioner : Chhotelai Khonna Versus v Respondents : State of Chhottisgarh and another W. P.($) No, 165 of 2007 W, P.($) No. 168 of 2007 Petitioner : Brijmohon Nayok Respondents : State of Chhottisgorh and another Versus Petitioner : Romkumar Choudhori ' Versus Respondents : State of Chhottisgorh and another And SB: Hon'bk Mr. Justice Sa‘fish K. Agniho’fri, J Present: ' Mr. A.N.‘ Bhakta, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mrs. Anju Ahuju, Depuiy Government Advocdfe, Mr. Arvind DuEey, Panel Lawyer, Ms. Smite Jain, Panel Lawyer for 1he ’mspondenrs/Smfe; r >0RDER (Passed on this 17'“ Day af January, 2007) L 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the Stare/respondenfs jointiy sJbmi'f 1haf fhe facts of the present writ petitions are similar to that of in W. P. (5) No. 5976/2006 (Sushi! Tiwari and others vs. State Government of Chhattisgorh & others), which was allowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. They further submit that the question of iaw involved is also the same. 2. In view of the above-stated slbmissions made by learned counsel for ‘the parties, these writ petitions are allowed in terms of the order dated 7.11.2006 passed by this Court in W.P. (5.) No. 5976/2006 :{Sud'iil Tiwari and others vs. State- Government of Chhattisgarh & others). No order as to costs. g. 'A copy of this order be placed on record in other connected writ petition. Subhash Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge