mm 111200 mamm (Wm mww Hmmw‘m mmm WW&WW *Wm writ #Letiuon gs; No.537zzos PETITIONERS 1. Bodh Ram Sac, S/o Shm‘ Puni Ram Sac, aged 64 Asst. Téacher, R/o at Post‘Tamnair, Tah, , Distt-Raigarh (CG) Lal Sao. S/o Chaitanya Sac, aged 63 yaars, Asst. Teacher, Govt Primary School, Mudaganul, At- K sdol, Post—Tamnar, Distt-Raigarh (CG) 3. Sahd o Singh Sidar, S/o Shri Banshi Ram Sidar, aged 66 years, Aéstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary Sch 1, Saraipali, at-Gorhi, ‘Post‘Tamnar, Distt.- Rai CG) 4. Mahe dra Nath Patanaik, S/o Shri Premanand Pata aik, aged 64 years; Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Prim ry School, Pata, at post—Tamnar, Distt- Raig h(CG) RESPONDENTS pl The ate of Chhattisgarh, through ~Secretexy, . Edu tion 8e; Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bha an, Raipur (CG) 2. Distl ct Education Officer, Distt-Raigarh (CG) 3, Assis ant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Dep, ment, Distt.—Raigarh (CG) Writ Petition U 6 of the Constitution of ludi 5.3. HON’BLE sHRI DHIRE DRA MISHRA. J - 25.09.2008 J Shri Somkant Verma, ounscl for the pch‘tioncrs. Smt, Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State] respondents. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed for a diIeCtion to the respondents to grant second kramonnati in accordance Wi'th the circular of the State Gove J1 ‘l ) r i ' g M t A 2 a . w Wm‘i‘aw‘iw wwnéylm WWW f§Q°tW %afl%matr&w Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that after completion ‘ of 24 years of semice, the pettioners are entitled to second kramonnau' as per circular dated 24.4 .2006 read with 17-3—1999] 19-4- 1999 (Annexure P-2). He further submits that issue involved in the present petition has already been ideled and decided by this Court vide order dated 4.7.2008 passe in WP. [s] No.3446/08 between DWat Singh Vs. State of Ch rk and others. He further submits that this petition be dispose of with liberty to the petitioners to make 1epresentation before the co cemed authoritv to consider the case of the petitioners in the light f order passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of of Tripura and others Vs. K.K. Roy (2004 SCW/ 1) and the order passed in Dalpat Singh (supra), to which learned counsel for the respondents / State has no objection. In View of the above submissions, the petition is disposed ofwith liberty to the petitioners to make a representation before the concerned authority raising all their grie vances raised in this petin'on and in turn, the concerned authority shal. decide their representation in the light of order passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of State of Tripura and others Vs. KR. Roy (2004 SCW/ 1) and the order passed in Dalpat Singh (supra). _ Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Certified copy as per rules. Judge s h a c