IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION (S) N0.7 2-^^ /2011. PETITIONER: ^9^..--' ^i^ ^.-^w- ...•-"'A?-''''^'' ^?sy. y.»^ ..•••' ^•""' ^- Respondents i^ Rohit Singh Chandel, son of Chudamani Chandel, aged about 50 years, working as Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Rajeev Gandhi Nagar Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. versus • /l. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary School Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Distaict Education Officer, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. - 3. Joint Du-ector, Treasury and Accounts, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDLA. ^ ^> .^s^ ^^.s?^ 1<K •^ .-c HIGH COUKS' OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIL.'\SPLTR WRTT PETITION (S)No. 2266 of2011 PETmONER RE.SPO^TDENTS Rohit Singh Chandel. V'ERSUS State ofClihattisgarh &0thers. ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ,1RTICLE. 226 OF llffi CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble SIn-i Satish K. Aeniliotri. J. Present: Slii-i C.J.K.Rao, Advocate for the petitioner. Sliri P.K.Bhaduri, Paiicl LAwyer forfhe State/respondents. (Passed on 29m day ofApril, 2011} 1. Leamed counsel appearmg for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks pei-mission of this Court to witlidraw tliis petition with libeily to make a representation in the light of circular dated 05.01.2011 issued by the Govemment of Chhattisgarh, School Education 2. Leai-ned counsel appearing for otlier side has no objection. 3. No pennission ofthis Court is required to make representation to the respondent authorities. Thus, such direction cannot be issued. However, ifthe petitioners make a representation to the respondent authorities, the same may be considered aiid decided in accordaiice 'with law, on its own merits and perspective. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge .''unit l^saiiir