IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4068 of 2010 RAVI SAMDARSHI . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 3.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The defence is that in the original complaint case under Sections 409, 420 and other provisions of the Penal Code, the petitioner was cited as a prosecution witness. The complaint case was sent for investigation under Section 156(3) Cr. P.C., which specifically named two accused. The defence of one of the named accused in the police investigation has led to the implication of the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/-(twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Alauli P.S. Case No. 97 of 2008 (arising out of complaint case No. 628C/08), subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)