IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 37999 of 2010 Date of decision: 05.05.2011 Ram Sarup ........ Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. V K Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Amit Rana, DAG, Haryana for the respondent - State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) It is not disputed that the co accused of the petitioner has since been enlarged on anticipatory bail. It is also not disputed that the petitioner has since been regularly appearing before the trial Court and bail bonds furnished by the petitioner have been duly accepted. In view of the above, the order dated 23.12.2010 passed by this Court is made absolute. Disposed of accordingly. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 05.05.2011 mohan