:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.668 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.668 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.668 OF 2007 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.551 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.551 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.551 OF 2007 Vijay Maruti Kamble ..Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. Shri N.J.Patil, adv. for the Applicant. Smt.S.V.Gajare, APP for the State. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : JUNE 16, 2007. DATE : JUNE 16, 2007. DATE : JUNE 16, 2007. P.C. 1. Heard Mr.Patil the learned counsel for the applicant and Ms.Gajare the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant was convicted for the offences punishable under Section 376 and 506 of the I.P.C. and for the first charge, he was sentenced to undergo R.I. for 7 years and to pay fine of Rs.500/-. Pending his appeal against the conviction and sentence, he seeks to be released on bail. Prosecution case in brief is that the prosecutrix, aged about 19 years, was a divorcee. While she was living with her uncle, she developed love affair with the present applicant and out of illicit intimacy, she became pregnant and also gave birth to the child. The applicant had allegedly promised to marry her but later on he refused to marry her and there is a dispute of paternity of the child. She :2: lodged the report about the same. During the trial the applicant was on bail. 3. Taking into consideration the above circumstances, the applicant is granted bail on same terms and conditions as before the trial Court subject to his furnishing fresh bail bonds and depositing fine amount. 4. Application stands disposed off. [J.H.BHATIA, J.] [J.H.BHATIA, J.] [J.H.BHATIA, J.] :3: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.551 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.551 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.551 OF 2007 Vijay Maruti Kamble ..Appellant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. Shri N.J.Patil, adv. for the Appellant. Smt.S.V.Gajare, APP for the State. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : JUNE 16, 2007. DATE : JUNE 16, 2007. DATE : JUNE 16, 2007. P.C. 1. Heard Mr.Patil the learned counsel for the appellant and Ms.Gajare the learned APP for the State. 2. Admit. (J.H.BHATIA, J.) (J.H.BHATIA, J.) (J.H.BHATIA, J.)