THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.3461 of 2010 (Dated : 13-08-2010) Between: Mukamala Linga Swamy S/o Maraiah R/o Pulipalula village, Mungodu Mandal, Nalgonda District. …Petitioner A n d Mukamala Rama Devi @ Devi W/o Linga Swamy Nalgonda Town, Nalgonda District. …Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.3461 of 2010 ORDER: This revision is directed against the order dated 11.5.2010 passed in I.A.No.215 of 2010 in O.P.No.7 of 2010 on the file of Family Court-cum-Additional District and Sessions Judge, at Nalgonda, whereby and whereunder, the learned Judge, Family Court granted interim maintenance to the respondent-wife at the rate of Rs.1,500/- per month and Rs.500/- per month to the child aggregating to Rs.2,000/- per month until further orders. 2. The petitioner-husband filed O.P.No.7 of 2010 under Section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking divorce. The respondent-wife entered appearance in the said O.P and filed I.A.No.215 of 2010 under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking maintenance at the rate of Rs.3,000/- per month for self and Rs.2,000/- to her daughter. It is stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition that the husband is earning an amount of Rs.10,000/- per month as a lorry driver apart from agricultural income of Rs.2,00,000/- and whereas she is not in a position to maintain herself and her child, and therefore, maintenance at the rate of Rs.3,000/- for self and Rs.2,000/- for her child has been sought. 3. The petitioner-husband filed counter resisting the application. It is stated in the counter that the petitioner is working as a private car driver getting a salary of Rs.2,000/- per month and he is unable to maintain himself with his meager income. 4. The learned Judge, Family Court, on hearing the counsel appearing for the parties, granted monthly maintenance at the rate of Rs.1,500/- to the wife and Rs.500/- to the child, by order dated 11.5.2010. The said order is assailed in this revision. 5. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the material brought on record. 6. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the trial Court has not assigned any reasons for fixing the quantum of maintenance at the rate of Rs.1500/- to the wife and Rs.500/- to the child per month, and therefore, the order impugned in the revision is liable to be set aside. 7. Indisputably, the maintenance granted to the respondent herein and her child is only pending disposal of O.P.No.7 of 2010. The relationship between the parties is not in dispute. The quantum of amount granted by the trial Court is not on high side. Since the order passed by the learned Judge, Family Court operates during pendency of the O.P.,I am not inclined to interfere with the same. However, the learned Judge, Family Court is directed to dispose of O.P.7 of 2010, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 8. Subject to the above observations, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed at the admission stage. No costs. _____________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J Dt.13-08-2010 RAR THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.3461 of 2010 (Dated : 13-08-2010)