D @?(@%L IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITIONM 4’ No. x EA 12007 PETITIONER // Mahendra Khandelwal S/o Shri V.P.Khandelwal, aged about 49 years, Resident of Dani Tola, Dhamtarj, District Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Commercial Tax, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Commercial Tax Officer, Dhamtari Circle, Dhamtari (C.G.) M/s. Rahul Castings and Forging Industries, K.K. Road, Registration No.RYP/02/1393, Raipur (C.G.), through Sunil Ku. Pathak S/o Shri Mukut Narain Pathak, aged 55 yerars R/o Lily Das Road, Opp. Bnétia Nursing Home, Civil Lines Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENT The petitioner above named most respectfully submits as under: PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: As mentioned in the cause title above. v PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS: As mentioned in the cause title above. / XI—HC—78 WW ' .JAJ€.CTII)NNQ;. iS' \ 2007 maa‘rm ’% Thakur Vijay Singh and 81m pétitioner‘ Shri Vinav Hark, leamm Stats. Hsard. The patifionar has ‘chaJ Annexure P-l issued bv t Dhamtari/ raspondem. No.2 agg Nai—E—M/s. Rahu1 Cas'tjngs and . The. grievance of the peti' the liability became due, the pe‘ of the firm and notice to this e& Commercial TaX Department then a (iemand notice of Anne) submits that after receiving th‘ made a representation vide Ar Tax Officer, Dhamtari. HoWev: representation the respondent. recover the tax liabilitv of the sa I have head 1earned coul It is not in dispute t: Amrito Das, counsel for the i Dy. Advocate General for the lenged the demand notice of he Commercial Tax Officer, inst the iiability of respondent *‘orging Industries. inner is that on the date when itioner ceasetl to be the partner ect had alreadv been sent to the tn accordance with law. Even ure P—l was issued. He further i demand notice, the petitioner nexnre P—6 to the Commercial 3r Without deciding the above s are taking coercive steps to id firm from the petitioner. Lsel for the panties. representation dated 10.0‘2V2Ot 1at the petitioner has made )6 before the Commercial Tax P.T.O. WW<Q§W> 1 WWW wwwm $WW 05.92.2007 Shri Ma11i1'1dra Shrivamava. Sr. Advocate with Shri XI—HC—78 @ HW,WW,W Wm 2007 WW(W) mmwm J,/ WW%WW éaWanézT Offlcm, Dhamtari raising his g notice, Leanmd counsel for the instant petition may be dispos réspondsnt/authority to deck] which is not opposed by learned In viow of the above subll of with a diroction to the Com: No2 to decide the representz reaeoned order after affording parties within 3O davs from t order, till then no coercive Step recovew as against the petitione Consequently, M.W.P‘ 1‘ 750f2007 staid disposed of. grievance against the demand petitioner submits that the ed of with a direction to the e the above represemsation, counsel for the State, .ission, the petition is disposed nereial Tax Officer] respondent rtion dated 10.02.‘2006 bv a opportunity of hearing to the he date of production of this s shall be taken for the above I0. 282/2007 and LA. No. Sd/— Dhirendra Mishra Judge P.T.O.