IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29425 of 2008 GUJO MANDAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 6.8.2008 Heard. The learned Presiding Judge of F.T.C.No.2, Madhepura while rejecting the prayer for bail does not appear stating any fact or material which could be relevant for rejecting the prayer for bail and went on passing the order merely by translating the FIR. This court does approve of the manner in which the prayer was dismissed, which directly affected the personal liberty of a person. The contention is that the petitioner is not named in the FIR; as the petitioner is really not and that there was no test identification parade organized for putting the petitioner on that in spite of the petitioner being in custody since 26.2.2007. The other contention is that nothing has been recovered from petitioner’s possession. Let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing P.R. bond of Rs.500/-(five hundred)only without any surety to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.No.2, Madhepura in S.Tr.No.134(A) of 2000(Kishunganj P.S.Case no.222 of 1998. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )