IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 6TH JANUARY 2009 / 16TH POUSHA 1930 RP.No. 1315 of 2008(E) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.34901/2008 Dated 26/11/2008 .................... PETITIONER(S): 1ST RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------------------------ THE NEDUNGAPRA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED NO.135, NEDUNGAPRA P.O., VIA.KURUPPAMPADY, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADV. SRI.V.G.ARUN SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS 2 TO 4: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SUKUMARAN.K.U., S/O.UNNIRA, (MEMBER NO.8738, NEDUNGAPRA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.)KALLIDUMBIL HOUSE, VENGOOR, NEDUNGAPRA, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), KOCHI-16. 3. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL),KUNNATHUNAD, PERUMBAVOOR P.O., ERNAKULAM. 4. KERALA CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION COMMISSION, TRIVANDRUM. ADV. SRI. N.K.SUBRAMANIAN FOR R1 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSHKUMAR FOR R2 & R3 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/01/2009 ALONG WITH WPC NO. 36038 OF 2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.P.1315/2008 in WP(C).34901/2008-E & W.P.(C).36038/2008-M = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 6th day of January, 2009. JUDGMENT In the judgment sought to be reviewed in the first among the captioned matters, there was a direction to consider certain objections to the continuance of certain members. Later, the Assistant Registrar had initiated certain proceedings. That led to the filing of WP(C). 36038/2008 in which there is an interim order. Following that situation, the election was held and it is also stated that around 583 persons were removed from the voters' list. It is agreed by all sides that no fruitful exercise could be carried out in the writ court and all that is required is to preserve the rights of parties for all reliefs in relation to the election and membership. Preserving all such rights, the RP1315/08 & WP(C)36038/08 -: 2 :- review petition and the writ petition are closed without prejudice and without entering anything further on merits. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/090109