IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-601 of 2009 Date of Decision:19.3.2010 Renna and another .... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Ajay Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ravish Kaushik, D.A.G. Haryana. Mr. Saurabh Bajaj, Advocate for respondent No.5. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. The prayer made in the present petition is for issuance of direction to the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and private respondent should not interfere in their married life. Learned counsel for respondent No.5 states that an FIR is registered against petitioner No.2, whereas the prayer for protection to life and liberty of petitioner No.1 has become infructuous as presently petitioner No.1 is residing with respondent No.5. It is further stated by the learned counsel for respondent No.5 that there is no threat to the life and liberty of petitioner No.1. Since, petitioner No.1 is in custody of respondent No.5, respondent No.5 shall make sure that petitioner No.1 is not harmed in any manner. In view of the above, the instant petition stands disposed of with the direction to Superintendent of Police, Panipat, to look into the aspect of threat to the life and liberty of petitioner No.2 and take appropriate steps in pursuance to the same, if need be. Learned counsel for the parties are agreed that the interim orders passed in the present petition should not have any bearing in the CRM M-601 of 2009 -2- finding or investigation to be done by the concerned Superintendent of Police except that in case the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Panipat, has not completed the enquiry regarding the age of the girl in pursuance to the direction/order of this Court dated 26.5.2009, the same shall be completed within reasonable time and placed on record of the case to be considered by the appropriate authority/Court at an appropriate stage. Ordered accordingly. 19.3.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE