IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1955 of 2011 RANJU KUMARI & ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. ----------- 2. 28.01.2011. After having heard Sri Chitranjan Sinha, senior counsel appearing for the petitioners and after having perused the impugned order dated 1.6.2010 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in Falka P.S.Case No.15 of 2009, the court finds no reason to interfere with the order. However, the court is desirous of pointing out to the court of Sessions that in case the case being committed to it for trial it should strictly adhere to the provisions of Sections 227 and 228 Cr.P.C. and pass an order after clearly and deeply considering the materials which could be contained in the police report, submitted to the court. The court while hearing the petitioners under Sections 227 and 228 Cr.P.C. shall specially consider the material from the angle of the provisions of Section 228(1)(a)which requires recording a finding that an offence exclusively triable by the court of Sessions is made out on fact of the case. While considering the material, 2 at that particular stage, the court of Sessions shall also consider whether there were sufficient materials indicating the complicity of petitioner no.1 Ranju Kumari who is said to be unmarried daughter of petitioner no.2 Singheshwar Mandal and, thereafter, decide whether it was required to frame charges against them. The petition is dismissed with the above directions. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha,J.)