IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.259 of 2010 Lalan Pandey S/O Late Nemdhari Pandey R/O Vill+P.O. Dibhiya, P.S. Karahgar, Distt. Rohtas ---Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Sri Ram Singh S/O Not Known to the petitioner, District Superintendent of Education, Rohtas. 3. District Provident Fund Officer, Rohtas. ---Opposite Parties ---------------------------------- 4. 22.9.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Separate show cause has been filed on behalf of opposite parties no.2 and 3. Learned counsel for the State submits that on perusal of the show cause it would appear that the order has been complied with by passing the necessary orders and also making the necessary payments admissible to the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not been paid the full amount. Be that as it may, since the order of this Court has been complied with by passing appropriate orders and making the payments as detailed in the show cause, I am not inclined to proceed further in the matter. The contempt application stands disposed of. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)