1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ::: ORDER 1. SB Civil Contempt Petition No.253/2006 Sanjay Sukhadia vs. Ashok Singhvi & Ors. AND 2. SB Civil Contempt Petition No.94/2007 Sanjay Sukhadia vs. Ashok Singhvi & Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT ::: May 28th, 2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.M.Mridul,Sr.Adv. a/w Mr.PS Chundawat & Ms.Vandana, for the petitioners. Mr.NM Lodha, AAG ) for the respondents. Mr.V Bishnoi ) Mr.DD Thanvi ) - - - - - BY THE COURT : These two contempt petitions have been filed by the same petitioner with the allegation that in spite of the interim order passed by this Court,the State authorities went on granting mining leases without making any reservation for 2 members of the SC/ST and to save themselves officers have mentioned condition in the lease deed that the lease is subject to decision in SBCWP No.5894/2005. In fact, the respondents have deliberately and mischiefly in violation to the Policy of reservation made in the Granite Policy, 2002 and to flout the order of this Court granted the leases. The detail facts which have been brought on record by supplementary pleadings and by filing various documents and which came in reply are not required to be mentioned in this order in detail in view of the fact that the State Government itself proceeded in a manner, which was not appreciated by this court in judgment delivered today i.e., 28.5.2008 in SBCWP No.5894/2005 but the officers of the State appears to have acted with the approval of the State followed the interpretation of the State is found wrong then in the facts of the case, the act of the respondents cannot be held to be deliberate and willful. In view of the above, I do not find any reason to proceed with these contempt petitions as the persons in whose benefit, the writ petitions have been filed may get the benefit after decision of the writ petition. 3 Hence, both the contempt petitions are dismissed and the notices are discharged. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. cpgoyal/-