IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29815 of 2008 PRAMOD KUMAR, SON OF PARSURAM THAKUR, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 1308, RAMPUR KUSHUNI URF REPURA, P.S. SAKRA, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR------------PETITIONER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR-------------OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- 04. 31.03.2009. Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to correct the prayer portion of the application in the light of his supplementary affidavit. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence under Section 395 of the Penal Code, which was registered against unknown. It is submitted on his behalf that during investigation he has been implicated as the one who had kept the subject matter of dacoity in the house of Rajendra Choudhary. Counsel for the petitioner states that such statement could have been made by Rajendra Choudhary, who has never been examined during investigation. Counsel also submitted that petitioner’s antecedent is absolutely clean. Let the petitioner Pramod Kumar surrender in the court below within four weeks from today and the court below should confirm from the case diary, whether Rajendra Choudhary was examined to confirm that petitioner was residing in the house wherefrom the subject matter of the dacoity was recovered and the court below should also confirm that petitioner’s antecedent is absolutely clean and if both the facts are correct then he be - 2 - admitted to the privilege of bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Barh, Patna in connection with Mokama P.S. Case No. 182 of 2000, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J)