IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46561 of 2008 MUNULAL PASWAN SON OF LATE MAHO PASWAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BIRUPUR,P.S.BIRUPUR (BARAHIYA),DISTRICT LAKHISARAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.47721 of 2008 BANARAS PASWAN SON OF BALESHWAR PASWAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BIRUPUR,P.S.BIRUPUR,DISTRICT LAKHISARAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 2.2.2009 Since both the above applications arise out of one and the same police case, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The petitioners of both the cases apprehend their arrest in Barahiya P.S.Case No. 25 of 2008 which has been registered for offences under Sections 341,323 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation is that these two petitioners and others assaulted the informant and his son and later on they pushed the informant’s wife into a well. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that petitioner Nunulal Paswan is not named in the first information report. He is neighbour of the informant and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel appearing for the informant submits that the injury has been found to be grievous in nature and the wife of the informant Raj Mani Devi also sustained injury in course of drowing. It appears that in the first information report, the name of petitioner Nunulal has been described as Munnilal which appears to be a clerical error. There is allegation of assault against both the petitioners. Taking into consideration the entire facts 2 and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, their prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)