IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.7559 of 2009 Between: Smt.V.Prasanna ..... Petitioner AND 1.The Government of India, rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Mines, New Delhi and 5 others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt.N.Shoba Counsel for respondent No.1: None appeared Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 to 4: AGP for Industries & Commerce Counsel for Respondent No.5: AGP for Revenue Counsel for respondent No.6: Sri Ponnala Srinivas The Court made the following: Order: At the interlocutory stage, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties. This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside Memo No.1333/M.III(2)/2009-1, dated 20-03-2009, of respondent No.2, and restrain him from proceeding with cancellation of the mining lease for Dolomite granted in favour of the petitioner over an extent of Acs.34.379 (14.13) Hects., in Survey No.401 of Laxmipuram Village, Bonakal Mandal, Khammam District. At the hearing, Smt.N.Shoba, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submitted that this Writ Petition was filed pending revision petition before the Government of India; that subsequently, the said revision petition was disposed of and; that therefore, the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the aforesaid submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, interim order, dated 15-04-2009, in WPMP.No.9931 of 2009, is vacated and WPMP.Nos.9930 & 9931 of 2009 and WVMP.No.3031 of 2009 are disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 15th June, 2011 lur