: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.1516 of 1990 SUIT NO.1516 of 1990 SUIT NO.1516 of 1990 ICICI Bank Ltd. .. Plaintiffs. Versus Vivek Seth .. Defendant. Mr.Suresh Jadhav for plaintiffs. Mr.H.Nikumbh i/b.Tushar Goradia for defendant. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATE : 30th August, 2008. DATE : 30th August, 2008. DATE : 30th August, 2008. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. By order dated 5.5.2008, evidence affidavit was ordered to be filed. That has not been done till today though in the meantime, matter was adjourned on 2 occasions. Today also, learned Advocate for the plaintiffs sought time to file evidence affidavit. Considering the conduct of the plaintiffs that they are not interested in complying with the orders of this court, particularly, when the matter is at the stage of recording of evidence, it is clear that the plaintiffs have no intention to continue with the matter. Hence, suit is required to be dismissed. 2. Suit is dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. : 2 : 3. After the aforesaid order was passed, learned Advocate Mr.Nikumbh appearing on behalf of the defendants in Suit No.1524 of 1990 and 1566 of 1990 informed the court that these 2 suits ought to have been shown on Board. They are not shown on Board. In view of this, office is directed to show these 2 suits on 10.9.2008 on Board in the column of filing of evidence affidavit and documents. (R.Y. GANOO,J.) (R.Y. GANOO,J.) (R.Y. GANOO,J.)