IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6783 of 2008 SHANKAR THATHERA @ SHEO SHANKAR THATHERA, Son of Sita Ram Thathera, resident of Mohalla- Station Road, Dehri- on-Sone, West Mohanbigha, P.S. Dehri, District-Rohtas....Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar....................................................Opposite Party. ----------- 5. 7.10.2009. The explanation given by the C.J.M., Aurangabad although is accepted by this Court is very weak. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order dated 31.5.2007 taking cognizance under Sections 414, 25(1-B), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act is not tenable in view of the fact that apart from the confessional statement of the co-accused, there is no material against the petitioner. The involvement of the petitioner will have to seen at the stage of trial and this is not a stage for quashing of the order of cognizance on the aforesaid submissions. In the result, this application is dismissed. U.K. (Sheema Ali Khan,J)