IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24970 of 2011 Syed Tufail Ahmad @ Tufail Ahmad, Son of Late Mustaque Ahmad, Employee of Indian Railway, Presently posted as Chief Good Shed Supervisor, Gaya, Railway Good Shed East Central Railway, P.S. Delha, District Gaya. ---------- Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar. -------- Opposite Party ----------- 02/- 19/08/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the complainant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1399 of 2009 for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 407, 467, 468, 379, 471, 386/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, is one of the named accused in this complaint case with allegation that being an employee of Indian Railway, he has delivered cement to some other person in stead of person having receipt and authority for the same. Submission is that on receipt, there is instruction from the authorities of Maihar Cement to deliver consignment to a particular person and there is independent instruction also in this regard, vide Annexure – 2. In compliance of the same supply was made. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial 2 Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1399 of 2009, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for three years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)