HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.438 & 449 of 2011 COMMON ORDER: These two revision petitions are inter-connected and hence they are taken up together and disposed of by this common order. The petitioner in these revision petitions is the plaintiff, who filed these revisions under Article 227 of the Constitution assailing the order dated 8.12.2010 in I.A. Nos. 762 and 763 of 2010 whereby the Court below allowed the application filed under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of C.P.C. The 1st respondent-proposed party filed the aforementioned applications seeking to implead him as party to the proceedings in the suit and other interlocutory applications. Since the 1st respondent is claiming right and interest over the petition schedule property and since the dispute in question cannot be adjudicated without the presence of the 1st respondent, he is a necessary and property and the Court below rightly impleaded him as a party to the proceedings. Under the circumstances, I do not find any reasons to interfere with the impugned order. The revision petitions fail and they are accordingly dismissed. No costs. ________________ B. PRAKASH RAO,J Date: 18th February, 2011 pnb