IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.7567 of 2008 Date of decision: 15th December, 2009 Virender Singh … Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Gurvinder Singh Bhatti, Advocate for Mr. Puneet Bali, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Nehra, Senior DAG, Haryana for the State. Mr. J.P. Bhatt, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Petitioner in the present writ petition has challenged the order (Annexure P-10) dated 11th May, 2007 passed by Estate Officer, HUDA, Gurgaon, whereby representation submitted by the petitioner for allotment of residential plot under Oustees quota was rejected. Counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent Haryana Urban Development Authority periodically holds Oustees Lok Adalat. Learned counsel prays that his case be sent to the Oustees Lok Adalat for consideration of his claim. Mr. J.P. Bhatt, appearing for HUDA, has expressed his agreement that the matter be referred to the Oustees Lok Adalat. Counsel for the parties are also in agreement that they will be at liberty to assail the decision of the Oustees Lok Adalat in appropriate forum in accordance with provisions of law and that all the arguments raised in the present petition by the parties shall be available to them. Civil Writ Petition No. 7567 of 2008 In view of the joint statement made by counsel for the parties, present writ petition is sent to Oustees Lok Adalat. The Oustees Lok Adalat, after hearing the parties, may decide the case and give its award. Both the parties will be at liberty to assail the order of Oustees Lok Adalat in accordance with provisions of law and parties will also be at liberty to raise all arguments, available to them, including those which have been raised in the present writ petition. With the observations made above, present writ petition is disposed of. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE December 15, 2009 rps 2