C.W.P. No.16832 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.16832 of 2009 Date of Decision.18.11.2011 Sh. Joginder (s/o Sh. Ramji Pandit) Plot No.296, Gali No.10, Near Ranbaxy, Phase-I, Mohali .....Petitioner Versus The Permanent Lok Adalat and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. J.C. Kapoor, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.K. Gupta, Addl. Standing Counsel for U.T. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner challenges the order passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat rejecting his plea for allotment of site for persons, who were occupying various huts at the Labour Colony. The State had already given bio-metric card with the identification of the respective residents by thumb impression and photographs taken in digital form. Location 594 refers to the Labour Colony against BM No.14350 and the name of the occupant is given as Upender Pandit. The petitioner was making reliance on B.M. No.14350 and produced a copy, which showed that the Sr. No.14348 had been changed as 14350 and his name finds imprinted. Obviously, there has been some correction at some point of time but if a member of the family has been accorded an allotment on the basis of bio-metric card, the petitioner cannot have a grievance for an allotment C.W.P. No.16832 of 2009 -2- that has been made to one person in the family, his brother. The claim of the petitioner, in my view, was rightly rejected and there is no scope for interference in the writ petition. 2. The writ petition is dismissed. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE November 18, 2011 Pankaj*