IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL SPECIAL APPEAL NO. 38 of 2011 Baker Hughes Singapore Pte. ……Appellant. Versus Deputy Director of Income Tax and another. ……….Respondents. Present:- Mr. P.R. Mullick, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Arvind Vashisth, Advocate for the respondents. Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Barin Ghosh, C.J. (Oral) In view of the subsequent events, the present appeal has now become infructuous, inasmuch as whatever was being sought for in the present appeal has been granted by the learned Single Judge. The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of as infructuous. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 28.4.2011 Rathour