IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.65116-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: DECEMBER 8, 2006 Vikrant Singh ...PETITIONER VERSUS State of Haryana ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Ms.Meenakshi Dogra, Advocate, for Mr.R.S.Rai, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Partap Singh, Sr.DAG, Haryana. ... Petitioner Vikrant Singh apprehending his arrest in a non- bailable offence in case FIR No.525 dated 24.8.2006 registered under Sections 366/34/368/181/193 IPC at Police Station Udyog Vihar, Gurgaon, has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail. I have heard the counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the FIR. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner was only a witness of the marriage performed by the daughter of the complainant with Soraj Singh. The married couple had also approached this Court for seeking protection and they were relegated to the Superintendent of Police, Gurgaon, for providing necessary protection. Counsel further contends that the main accused Soraj Singh has also been granted anticipatory bail by this Court on the fact that he has performed marriage with the daughter of the complainant. Counsel contends that in terms of the interim order dated October 30, 2006, the petitioner has joined the investigation. Counsel for the respondent-State does not dispute this fact. In view of the above, the interim order dated October 30, 2006, Crl.Misc.No.65116-M of 2006 -2- is made absolute on the same terms and conditions. Disposed of accordingly. December 8, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE