IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 130 of 2011 Manish Nayal ……… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ………. Respondents Mr. Shailendra Singh Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Nandan Arya, A.G.A. for the State/respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for respondent No. 3. Date of Judgment : 18.03.2011 JUDGMENT Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. The petition is dismissed, inasmuch as it has not been stated by the petitioner, since when he disassociated himself with the agency. In the petition, it has also not been stated that the Court, in the circumstances indicated, can come to a prima facie view, that the matters complained of are so improbable that on the basis thereof, investigation cannot be initiated. It is not the contention that the First Information Report does not disclose a cognizable offence. (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 18.03.2011 Aswal