^ 'lyo/. INTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W . P. (S) N0, / R O^; / 2007 Petitioner ^^ /•' ^ i^Js-'^f/ ^%/ f.^o/' Q.! .,1.'^?"' <?-.- ,.f-' ^/y Versus Respondents ^) Smt. Parvati Bai, Aged about 57 Years, W/o Shri Ramlal Working as Reja (Labour), in permanent gangman, Office of S.D.0. Public Works Department, Sub Division Bemetara, R/o Village - Ddolia, Charbhata, Post - Jhal, Tehsil - Bemetara, Dist : Durg-(C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through-The Secretary .QOJ^ Public Works Department, ^•"t^ I ° / ~ ~^~—.. --— — -^ ^l^^62'1 .cs^ Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur-(C.G.) Engineer-In-Chief, Public Works Department, Near 'Raj Bhawan', Dist: Raipur-(C.G.) Supermtending Engineer, Public Works Department, Raipur Division, Dist : Raipur-fG.G.) Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Tehsil 8s Division Bemetara, Dist: Durg-(C.G-) 3) 4) (2) 5) The Sub Divisional Officer, Sub Division Bemetara, Tehsil - Bemetara, Dist: Durg-(C.G-) ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P.fS) No. 1206 of 2007 Petitioner Smt. Parvati Bai Versus Reqaondents : Staite of Chhattisgarh and others SB: Hon'bte Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnjhotri. J Present: Mr. Rnkesh Anthony, Advoaite for the petitioner. Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Sovemment Advocate for the State/respondents. OR 1>ER O'assed on this 1st &oy of March, 2007) 1. By this petition, leamed counsel dppearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was employed in the year 1977 as permanent Gangman in the Pubtic Works Department, who has worked about 30 years as Gongmon seeks a retief that the petitioner being permanent gangnKin be retired at the age of 62 years in accordance with -the Chhattisgarh Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivarshiki-Ayu) Adhiniyam, 1967 (for short '-the Act, 1967') read with Fundamental Rule (for diort' "F.R.')56. 2. According to tearned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner attained the status of permanent anployee, os defined under Rule 2(c) of the Chhatt-isgarh (Workcharged ond Contingency Paid Employees) Pension Rules, 1979 (for shorf 'the Rutes, 1979'), framed under Articte 309 of the Constftution of India. After having att'ained the status of the permanent employee the S^^SfSSWS'SSffi'SSS'SSSSS^^^' petitioner would retire on attainting -the age of 62 years on superonnuation under the provisions of the Act, 1967. 3. Leamed counsel dppearing for the petitioner wpuld submit •t+iat the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the decision of this Court- passed on 4th Jonuary, 2007 in W.P. Nto. 108/2005 (©ovindVs. State of Chhattisgarh A others) and other connected matters. 4. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents/State does not dispute the submissions made by leamed counsel for the petitioner. "^bhash 5. Accordingfy, the petitioner, who is permcment gangman, is entitled to retire on attaining the age of 62 years in accordance with the Act, 1967. The petition is accordingly allowed. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge