*t—Vt"V i '''',. c^^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.l 1 W.P.fSI No..jA,21.../2010 PETITIONERS: ^/y zy ^" 1. Santosh Kumar Sahu I; Aged about 30 Years, S/o Shri Champpalal Sahu, R/o- 48 Quarter. P.T.S Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 2. Shiv Kumar Surwanshi Aged about 32 Years, S/o Shri Hardev Prasad Surwanshi, R/o- Railway Station Jatkanhar, Post-Jatkanhar, Thana-Dongargarh District- Rajnandgaon(C.G.) 3. Sanjay Baghel Aged about 33 Years S/o Late Shri Ramadhin Baghel, R/o- Aman Nagar, Behind Sahu Complex, Mowa, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Sanjay Verma Aged about 29 Years S/o Shri Khem Singh Verma, R/o Gram-Semri, Post- Darbar Pokhli Thana-Patan, District- Durg (C.G.) 5. Gopi Ram Sahu Aged about 25 Years S/o Shri Keshav Ram Sahu, R/o- Adarsh Chowk, Lakholi, Ward No. 43, District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 6. Shantilal Sahu Aged about 32 Years S/o Late Shri Khemlal Sahu, R/o- Ramnagar, Muktidham Road, Infront of Arvind Book Depot, Bhilai, Post- Supela, District-Durg (C.G.) 7. Lekeshwar Kumar Sahu Aged about 30 Years S/o Shri Motiram Sahu, R/o Gram- Raja Bhanpuri, Post- Pendri District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 8. Suraj Prasad Dixit Aged about 25 Years S/o Dr. A.K.Dixit, R/o- Seepat Road, Sarkanda Bilaspur(C.G.) 9. Rajesh Kanojia Aged about 35 Years S/o Shri Suresh Chandra Kanojia, ' R/o- Suraj Laundry, Sector-9, Shop No.37, Bhilai, District- Durg (C.G.) 10. Tejnath Dhehria Aged about 32 Years S/o Shri Ledgaram Dhehria R/o-Gram-Nayakbandha, Post-Abhanpur District- Raipur (C.G.) 11. Purshottam Sharma Aged about 42 Years S/o Late Shri Bhuneswar Sharma, R/o- Gram- Bhalpur, Tehsil- Mungeli District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 12. Ganesh Singh pHuR.^fc Aged about 39 Years S/o Shri Pancham Singh Dhurve, R/o- Police Line, Kabirdham (C.G.) Ward No. 43, District- ftaju m (C.G.) -CL.. . VERSU^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Home Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director General of Police Police Head-Quarter, Governor's House Road Raipur (C.G.) 3." Inspector General of Police, Durg- Region, Durg (C.G.) 4~. Superintendent of Police District- Rajnandgaon 5. Superintendent of Police District- Kabirdham PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AN& CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS: KSKSS^S^^^^^SSSfS'WSSKSV'W'SS'S^'^. HIGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARH: BiS-ASPUR PETITiONERS RESPONDENTS Writ Petition (S) No.1497 of 2010 Santosh Kumar Sahu & Othere Versus State of Chh^tisgarh & Others it Petition under Articie 226 of fte Constitution of india) Singie Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this ?"' dayOfAprii, 2010) 1. By this petition, the petitioners seek a direction to the respondent No.3 inspector General of Police to decide the appeals preferred by the petitioners on 14-9-2009 against the order dated 24-8-2009 & 25-8-2009 wherebv the Detitioners have been removed from thsir respeetive services. 2. It appears that th®petitioners expect that every jurisdiction shouid be regulated by the High Court even disposal of case pending before the Appeliate Authorities. The appeals seem to have been pending consideraUon for the iast six months though there is no statutory prescription for considering the appeal within a specified time and it is aiso not proper to interfere in the quasi judicial process. 3. Accordinglv, the writ Detition faiis and is harebv dismissed at the motion stage itself. However, in the facts situation of the case and in the interest of justice. the Appeliate Authority may consider and decide the pending appeais of the petitioners and pa^ appropriate orders in accordance with iaw and on its own merits, as expaditiously as possibls. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge