1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.534 OF 1991 M/s.East Punjab Traders .. Petitioner. V/s. Union of India & Others .. Respondents. Mr.V.S. Nankani i/b. N.N.Gawankar for the petitioner. Mr.K. Kamdpile i/b. N.Masurkar for the respondents. CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 19TH JANUARY, 2005. DATED : 19TH JANUARY, 2005. DATED : 19TH JANUARY, 2005. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. 2. By this petition, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 4th January, 1991 passed by the CEGAT. We perused the said order. The CEGAT has reduced the fine to Rs.1,00,000/- and on the basis of the said order the petitioner seems to have cleared the goods. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that in the past on identical facts and circumstances the goods were allowed to be cleared without payment of fine. However, no particulars and details of the same disclosed till 2 today. Under these circumstances, we do not find anything perverse or illegal in the said order of CEGAT. The writ petition is devoid of any substance. Hence, rule stands discharged. (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)