IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.898 IF 2009. PETITION NO.898 IF 2009. PETITION NO.898 IF 2009. Dashrath Dharma Nikam and Anr ... Petitioners. Vs. Deola Agricultural Produce Market Committee & Ors ... Respondents. Mr M. S. Karnik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr A. H. Palekar, A.G.P. for the respondents Nos. 2 and 3. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. V.C.DAGA, J. V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 02.02. 2009. 02.02. 2009. 02.02. 2009. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that by passage of time, the petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs. However, the petitioner is at liberty to avail any other remedy which may be available. (V.C.DAGA, (V.C.DAGA, (V.C.DAGA, J.) J.) J.)