IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.27251 of 2011 Umesh Thakur S/o Sri Bhrigunath Thakur, R/o Village Medhuka, P.S. Baniapur, district-Saran. --Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar --Opp.Party 2 07.09.2011 Supplementary affidavit has been filed. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is one of the named accused in this case being husband of the deceased daughter of the informant who died within six years of marriage during treatment, leaving behind two male child. Submission is that the informant, on getting information, has also filed an application exonerating the petitioner and others. Moreover, other co-accused had been granted privilege by this court by composite order passed in Cr.Misc. no. 20553 and 20556, both of 2011. Considering the facts and circumstances, in the event of informant appearing before the court below supporting contents of petition said to have been filed and also appearing as one of the bailers, the petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. !0,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in Baniapur P.S. Case no. 26 of 2011, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioner shall remain present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be canceled. AAhmad ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)