FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.9122 OF 2011 "Bismillabee Shaikh Gulam Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. S.P. Sonpawale, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. V.D. Rakh, AGP for respondent No.1. Mr. S.T. Shelke, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & A.V. POTDAR, JJ. DATE :- 28TH NOVEMBER, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] Perusal of the impugned order would reveal that the Returning Officer has given cogent and sound reasons for rejection of the nomination paper of the petitioner. It has been found that in so far as the present petitioner is concerned, in the authorization form, in the column of number of Prabhag, she had only written 3 and it was not written as 3(c). In so far as the nomination paper of Daud Usha, is concerned, she has specifically written 3(C) in the column of number of Prabhag. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for interference. Hence, writ petition is rejected. [A.V. POTDAR,J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/-