IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 27642 of 2008 Between: Hanmanthu S/o. Hanmappa APSRTC. Shad Nagar Depot. R/o. 18-7-459/12, Hanuman Nagar, Uppuguda, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Depot Manager APSRTC. Shad Nagar Depot, Mahaboobnagar District. 2 The Dy. Chief Traffic Manager APSRTC. Mahaboobnagar Region, Mahaboobnagar. 3 The Regional Manager APSRTC. Mahaboobnagar Region, Mahaboobnagar. 4 Inquiry Officer APSRTC. Mahaboobnagar Region, Mahaboobnagar. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the Nature of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the Proceedings No. 02/95 (65)/06-SDNR dt.28-10-2006 on the file of the 1st respondent and enquire into the matter quash the same declaring the proceedings of the 1st respondent removed the petitioner from service dt. 28-10-2006 as well as rejection of the appeal and review petition by the 2nd and 3rd respondent dt. 02-09-2007, 24-04-2008 are illegal, improper, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India as well as service rules and regulations of the APSRTC and against the principles of natural justice consequently direct the respondents to reinitiate the petitioner into service with effect from 28-10-2006 with continuity of service with all attendant benefits by awarding back wages. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.SRINIVASA SHARMA Counsel for the Respondents: SMT.B.G.UMA DEVI The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to approach the Labour Court. Permission is accorded and the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Labour Court. No costs. _____________ N.V.RAMANA, J. Dated:19.12.2008 GJ