Siflgt88encR IN THE HI6H COURTOF JUbICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.6.) Wl^ PETTTION No. 4^/2-/2004 PETTTEONER •« RESPONDENTS ,^1. '<c^ ^'^^y <^ •^. nw^vs zftffft^ '^'•f' .(?A\ AVINASH KUMARCHANbRAKAR. S/o t?r. Charidrdshekhar Chandrakar, Aged aboyt 27 years, R/o.AAalgujdr'pdra.P.Q.-Keshkal, DISTRICT- PASTAR (CMHATTIS6ARH). VERSUS State of Chhatt'isgarh.; Through: Secpetdr'y; &epqrtmient of Enviornmental AUrban t>evelopmentMantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, RAIPUR (£.£.). Collector (I'qnchayat Branch), District Bastar (G.6.). Chief Nagar Panchayat Officer, Nagqr Panehayat Keshkal, t>istrict- Bastar (C.G.) The Presiderit / Chairman, Nagar PanchayatKeshkal, District-Bastdr(C.6.). ^l WfOT PEnnON UNOERA'IKTECLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTTTUTEON OF IN&IA EOK3SS(.;ANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRTT IN NATUREOFllAAN&AMUS/ CERTIORARI XI-HC-78 /rG& *ll<10l ^TT^ ^3SeTr<<l41ri^,t»-A'ti<i?,Rttltl^ ...Wf...^i^^................ '\ gn$¥iqgtS ('i?fg?3) ^200 sii^^TwR'ii* a2IT3D^?Tri>1 ^ 4. Subbu ^<?1 ^? '^"i ?^IT8R;Hfel3II^ST DMSION BENCH HON'BLESHRI A.K. PATNAIK. &HON'BLESHRIS.K.AeNtHOirRI.J. 20.07.2005 W.P.No.4712of2004 Heard Mr. Gurudev Shar<in, tearned counsel for ttie-petitioner and MT. Prashant Mishra, leamed Ad|ditional AdvocateGeneralwitti Mr. Sanjay S. Agrawal, learned Govemroent Advocate for the State of ChhatBsgarh / respondente. This writ petition has b^en ftled for quashing the tender notice advertised 'tri news paper on 22 work. learned counsel for the petitione is a peace loytng and a pUblic spi petitioner in filina ths-petttjon Sd/- ChiefJustice cbl^l(«*<i1'f*11tldT't"fe^t'tlutt^l< ?!3if?iq317^?I P9.2004 wilh regard to some constructioh On 13.07.2005, the Coui|t passed order calling upon the leamed counsel for the petltioner to sati^fy thls Courtas to why the| Btioner has filed this petition as PIL. Despjite the said order, Mr.,GumdevSharan, has not been able to satisfy the Court as .-*-^. to how the petitoner is interes^sd in this writ peUtton. He himself^iot intendt to submit the tender r|or as he incUcated anywhere in ttie writ petition about the locus standi to|filethis writ peUBon excepl stating fliat he itod cHizen of thdia. We have serious doubtsabout the locus stendiand bonafide ofthe tnre accordinflly.ldismiss thesame. .^—--^^ Sd/- Satish IC. Agnihotri Judge