WP(C) 5475/2007 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. D.A. Kaiyum, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. R. Chokraborty, learned State counsel. The petitioner is aggrieved by the notice issued to him under Section 18 (2) of the Assam Land and Revenue Regulation directing him to vacate the plot o f land mentioned in the schedule. The notice has been issued in Misc. Case No. M RF. 3/2007. There is no material before this Court in respect of the proceeding in Misc. Case No. MRF 3/2007. It is the case of the petitioner that he is in pos session of the land. In this connection, he has referred to Annexure- E letter d ated 15.03.04 addressed to the Deputy Commissioner, Morigaon by the Circle Offic er, Lahorighat Revenue Circle. Further case of the petitioner is that he being a landless person, is entitled to be considered for settlement. Without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I dispose of th e same providing that it will be open for the petitioner to approach the appropr iate authority agitating his grievance against Annexure- F notice issued in Misc . Case No. MRF 3/2007. Upon such approach being made, the authority shall pass appropriate order in accordance with law.