- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.968 OF 1994 Tarun Singhal and Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.Rajiv Patil with M/s.Dunmorr Sett Advocate for Petitioners Mr.Ajay S.Patel Advocate for Respondent No.2 Mrs.A.S.Pai APP for State ... CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, AND CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, AND CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : JULY 05, 2007 DATE : JULY 05, 2007 DATE : JULY 05, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The learned APP states that on completion of investigation, Police had already filed ‘A’ Summary report and the same has been accepted by the learned Magistrate by order dated 9th August, 1996. In view of the statement that ‘A’ Summary has been accepted, the learned advocate for the Petitioners craves leave to withdraw this petition. Leave - 2 - granted. Needless to say that we have not expressed any opinion on the points and contentions raised in this petition. 2. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and is disposed of. Rule discharged. [R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]