IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3211 OF 2008 IN APPEAL (L) NO. 384 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 264 OF 2007 Ravindra B.Nair & 4 Ors. ...........Appellants. V/S. M/s.Sindhwani Automobiles, Mumbai ...........Respondents --------- Ms.Rita K.Joshi, adv.for appellants. Respondents and advocate absent. CORAM : J.N.PATEL, & : SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. DATED : 6 th OCTOBER, 2009. P.C. : 1. Inspite of respondent being served, none appears. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. 2. For the reasons stated in the Affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion we are inclined to condone the delay as the same is not countered by filing any affidavit-in-reply to the same. Therefore, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). The appellant to get the appeal registered and put up for admission in due course. [SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J] [ J.N.PATEL, J]