IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26359 of 2011 Madan Yadav son of Jago Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3. 13.9.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307, 302 and 504/32 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the deceased died 18 days after the occurrence and it was noted in the postmortem examination report that the abrasions had healed. The Counsel for the informant submits that charges have been framed and the petitioner be cautioned that he may not tamper with prosecution evidence. Considering the nature of allegations and cause of death of the deceased, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Manpur P.S. Case No.9 of 2011, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court - 2 - about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. If the Trial Court receives any complaint about the petitioner tampering with prosecution evidence, he shall initiate proceedings for cancellation of petitioner’s bail. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )