IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7198 of 2010 1. NARESH YADAV, SON OF BILAS YADAV 2. NANDLAL YADAV, SON OF LATE KAILASH YADAV 3. HIMACHAL YADAV, SON OF LATE RAM BECHAN YADAV 4. DOMA YADAV, SON OF LATE NARSINGH YADAV 5. BAIDYANATH YADAV, SON OF BINDHYACHAL YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 05/03/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 324, 325, 307, 452 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Taking into consideration the fact that there is land dispute between the parties and there is a counter version of the same occurrence which has been instituted by father of petitioner No. 5 and the submission is that in the facts of the case, no offence under Section 307 I.P.C. would be made out, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, in connection with Bettiah Mufassil (Manuwapool) P.S. Case No. 225 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. (ii)That the petitioners will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be - 2 - present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)