IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 12TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 21ST KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 26742 of 2009(K) PETITIONER(S): -------------------- 1. RAJAN PILLAI, PLAVILA VEEDU, VASUDEVAPURAM, AYILAM P.O., MUDAKKAL. 2. SATHEESH, SANAL NIVAS, VASUDEVAPURAM, AYILAM P.O., MUDAKKAL. 3. RATHEESH, VILAYIL PUTHENVEEDU, VASUDEVAPURAM, AYILAM P.O., MUDAKKAL. 4. SUBAIR, VILAYIL PUTHEN VEEDU, VASUDEVAPURAM, AYILAM P.O., MUDAKKAL. 5. GOPINATHAN NAIR, SANAL NIVAS, VASUDEVAPURAM, AYILAM P.O., MUDAKKAL. BY ADV. SRI.SIBY MATHEW SRI.PHILIP J.VETTICKATTU SRI.B.PREMNATH (E) RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ATTINGAL. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ATTINGAL. WP(C).No. 26742 of 2009 :: 2 :: 3. B.SASEENDRAN, INDIRA NIVAS, VASUDEVAPURAM, AYILAM P.O., MUDAKKAL. ADV. SRI.M.DINESH FOR R3 R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 26742 of 2009 :: 3 :: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT, DATED 23.10.2008 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.(C)No.10014/2009. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT DATED 26.6.2009 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL //true copy// P.S. To Judge SK/- KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ W.P(C) No.26742 of 2009 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of November, 2009 JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph, J. The writ petition is filed seeking police protection against the 3rd respondent. 2. Counsel for the 3rd respondent submits that there is absolutely no basis for the allegations raised in the writ petition. He has not caused any threat or hindrance or nuisance to the petitioners and he has no idea to do so. 3. In the above circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of as follows: In the event of any interference caused by the 3rd respondent or his henchmen or causing any nuisance for the peaceful life and enjoyment of the property of the petitioners, it will be open to the petitioners to bring the matter to the notice of the 1st W.P(C)No.26742 of 2009 :: 2 :: respondent, in which case, the first respondent shall take effective action to render adequate protection to the petitioners and their property. Sd/- (KURIAN JOSEPH) JUDGE Sd/- (C.T.RAVIKUMAR) JUDGE SK/- //true copy// P.S. to Judge.