VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION No. 4359 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No. 2560 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax City-21, Mumbai Appellant Vs. Shri Vinay P. Thacker Respondent Mr. P. S. Sahadevan, for the Appellant. Mr. Atul K. Jasani, for the Respondent. CORAM : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, AND A. P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATE : JUNE 4, 2008. PC :- . Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the respondent. By this Notice of Motion, appellant is seeking condonation of 253 days delay in filing the appeal against the order dated 23rd September 2005 passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Perused the Notice of Motion and the affidavit in support thereof. The Notice of Motion and the affidavit in support thereof does not disclose the date of approval given by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax. The only reson given for the delay is the delinked work from the Ministry of - 2 - Law and Income Tax department and for taking various administrative steps by various authorities such as for the procurement of stamp paper. We are not at all satisfied with the reasons given in the affidavit, for condoning the delay, and no case is made out. Hence, the Notice of Motion stands dismissed. 2. In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion, Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 2560 of 2006 stands dismissed. Sd/- [ Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ] Sd/- [ A. P.BHANGALE, J.]