1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 2819 OF 2009 Ramu S/o Gangadhar Ghuge Versus State of Maharashtra and another *** Mrs. S. S. Jadhav , Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs. B. R. Khekale, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. *** 1. Heard learned counsel extensively. The counsel assisting A.P.P. also addressed the Court vehemently citing the order of learned Additional Sessions Judge as to how the learned Additional Sessions Judge has considered all the aspects while rejecting the application for pre-arrest bail. 2. The factual matrix indicate that it is the applicant and his father who are instrumental. The licence stands in the name of father of the applicant. The cheques are issued by his father. Though 17 to 18 traders feel that they have been cheated or deceived as the goods are purchased and the cheques in order to discharge the liability have not been honoured. At this stage of the matter, the protection 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. granted to the accused/ applicant Ramu Gangadhar Ghuge is extended in the same terms till filing of charge sheet. The accused/ applicant shall not influence the witnesses. Application is allowed. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:05/09/2009. ans/2819