IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46837 of 2008 1. BIJLI PASWAN @ RAJ KAMAL PASWAN, SON OF LATE SUKHDEV PASWAN 2. DIPU PASWAN, SON OF SAKALDEV PASWAN BOTH R/M LAXHMIPUR, WARD-14, P.S. ROSERA, DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR ----------------------PETITIONERS. Versus STATE OF BIHAR--------------------OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- 02. 16.12.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are accused in a case under Sections 399, 402 and 216A of the Penal Code. They are named in the First Information Report on the basis of the information derived from the three co- accused arrested at the spot, namely, Amarjit Kishore Sah, Ram Chandra Sahni and Lalita Devi. Besides the present case they are also accused in one case for the offence under Section 379 of the Penal Code, so submitted counsel for the petitioners. Let the antecedent of the petitioners be verified by the court below and if they are accused in only one case under Section 379 I.P.C. besides the present one then they, namely, Bijli Paswan @ Raj Kamal Paswan and Dipu Paswan be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/-(Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rosera, Samastipur in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No. 127 of 2006. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J)