IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9006 of 2008 MUNDRIKA SINGH & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.5.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner prays for anticipatory bail in a complaint case under Section 498A read with Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner no. 1 is the father-in-law, petitioner no. 2 is the mother-in-law, petitioner no. 3 is the elder brother of the husband, petitioner no. 4 is the wife of petitioner no. 3 and petitioner no. 5 is the sister of the husband of the complainant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the allegations in the complaint petition are of general and omnibus nature. It is further submitted that a compromise took place between the complainant and her husband and thereafter the husband was granted anticipatory bail with the condition that if the complainant again complains then the bail may be cancelled. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that the petitioners, (1) Mundrika Singh, (2) Smt. Subhadra Devi, (3) Binod Kumar Singh, (4) Jyoti Devi and (5) Pratibha @ Tinni Kumari, in the event of their arrest/surrender in the court below within four weeks from today, shall be released on bail on furnishing 2 bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Complaint Case No. 627/07, Tr. No. 2909/07 to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram subject to the other applicable conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. P. Kumar ( Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.)