Petitioner Respan dents ¢ OW BEFGRE THE HON'BLE HIGE COURT OF CHHATT1$ARH AT BILASPUR wtP.N0n Lf3J—v3 /20020 — Satyendra Singh, aged 43 years, S/o Shri R.N.Singh I/C Ececutive Engineer, Mmicipal Corpn. Dug (0G). Versus (l) State Govtmf C.G. Through the §ecretarye ¥€ Nagariya Prashasban anc‘t Vikas Vibhag, D.KcBmWan, RAIPUR. 3hri B.K. Sinha, Paryavaran & Nagariya Vikas Vibhag, secretariate, D.K. Bhawan, RAIPUR (m). (3) mucipal Cox-m. Durg Through - The Commissioner Mmicipal Corporation,wrg (0G). (h) Shri PaN. Sam, New Posted on depwcation Eiecutive mineer, micipai Comm, Dunc/(ac) Writ petition mder article 226/227 oi Constitution o: India. itggEéiV/f 1 g, Qx «W? J/,..: 1 ‘SsT\ vi; l “j M” e o%\@ HiGl-I COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 1913 of2002 PETITIONER : Satyendra Singh. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State Govt. of C.G. & 3 Others. J < Writ Petition Under Article 226/227 Of The Constitution Of India. SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K Agnihotri. J. Present: Shn' Somkant Vanna, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri AV.Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri Sourabh Shauna, Advocate for the respondent No. 3. Shri Harsh Vardhan, Advocate for the respondent No. 4. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 02“a day of February, 2010) LA. No. 1. This is an appiication for withdrawal of the writ petition on the grounds stated therein. Learned counsel appearing for other side have no objecton. i It is ordered as prayed for. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order asto costs. i 5d!- Satish K. Agnihotr Judge S;K ‘ . ,