IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16245 of 2011 Nagendra Prasad Son Of Karmu Ram Resident Of Village- Bagha Khoh, P.O. Tetrarh, P.S.- Akarhigola, District- Rohtas Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna 2. The Distt. Magistrate Rohtas At Sasaram 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Dehri Distt.- Rohtas 4. The Block Development Officer Akorhigola, Distt.- Rohtas 5. The Block Supply Officer, Akorhigola, Distt.- Rohtas ---------------------------------- 2 24.10.2011. The petitioner, who is a P.D.S. dealer seeks quashing of the notice dated 10.6.2011 passed by the Block Development Officer, Akorhigola, Rohtas whereby he has been directed to refund Rs. 98,864/- the value of 72 quintal undistributed rice allotted to him under S.G.R.Yojana at the A.P.L. rate. Earlier similar matters had come up before this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 (Awadh Prasad Singh Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) & C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 (Suresh Prasad @ Raj Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.). The aforesaid writ applications have been disposed of by order dated 06.07.2011 after noticing the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. As the facts and issues are common, the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 would also govern the instant writ petition. This writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 including interim protection, as mentioned therein, with the condition that the petitioner would either deposit the value of 20% undistributed rice as indicated in the notice itself at the rate of 2 Rs.10/- per kilogram, or the rice itself in its present form within two months. Representation, filed by the petitioners in respect of their grievances within six weeks, would be disposed of by the respondents within further eight weeks. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)