1 apl25-11 jpc/- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 25 OF 2011 Kamal Hiranand Adnani .. Applicant Versus Assistant Commissioner of Customs and others .. Respondents Mr.Jaideep Lele i/by Bharat Rathod for the applicant Mrs. Smita Deokar for Respondent No.1, Mr.Rajesh More, APP for the State CORAM : N. D. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 9 th February, 2011 P. C. 1. Heard. 2. In this criminal application under section 482 of the criminal procedure code 1973, the main grievance of the applicant is that the learned Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 3rd Court, Esplanade, Mumbai at the time of remand at the instance of the respondents got executed the bail bound on surety on certain terms and conditions. Accused was arrested on 26th December, 2005 and was released 5 days thereafter. However, there is no complaint filed thereafter. The order of remand and the bail bond is executed by him pursuant to the remand is embarrassing and harassment to 2 apl25-11 him. 3. Admittedly there is no proceeding pending against the applicant as on today. All proceedings are being decided at various level. Learned counsel for the applicant agreed that these could be challenged in the revision before the Sessions Court and therefore seeks to withdraw the application with liberty. 4. The application is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to move the Session Court in revision who shall take into account all submissions and decide the revision application in accordance with law. 5. The parties shall be at liberty to take all such grounds and contentions which are raised in this application. 6. Needless to mention that powers of the Sessions Court are concurrent with that of the High Court under Section 397 of the Cr.P.C. 7. With the above observation the petition is disposed of. ( N. D. DESHPANDE, J. )