IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 21st March, 2006 Bail Application No. 194 of 2006 Order on the bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE 1. Anupam Prakash 2. Randhir 3. Sandeep Kumar 4. Kala Saini alias Rishipal R/o Yamunagar, Haryana ……..Applicant Versus State of Uttaranchal ……..Opposite Party In Case Crime No. 30 of 2006 U/s 420 I.P.C. Police Station – Vikasnagar District – Dehradun Hon'ble J. C. S. Rawat, J. Heard Sri Vinod Sharma-learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. It was contended on behalf of the applicants that the incident took place on 07.02.2006 and the F.I.R. was lodged on 13.02.2006. It was further contended on behalf of the learned counsel for the applicants that the complainant has given a sum of Rs. 10,000/- and thereafter he assured the applicant that he will double the said amount. The applicants given briefcase to him stating that there are currency note of Rs. 50/- each and it is not possible that the complainant could not see the notes at a glance. It was contended that it is not probable story. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case in totality, I am of the view tha it is a fit case for bail. Let the accused-applicants be released on bail on each furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the CJM concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 21.03.2006 Shiv