HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR APPLICANT Def, Np^lO Defeadants b^^it CivU Revision (P.R.) No. 2584/2010 6A /^Lf/^ VERSUS NON-APPLICANTS:- 1. Plaiatiffs 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Bhuwan Lal S/o Late Gaindu Gond, aged about 40 years, R/o Pagbandhi, Tahsil Dhamdha, District Durg (C.G.). Ram Dular Gond, S/o late Ramu Gond, aged about 45 years, R/o viUage Pagbandhi, Post Rajpur, Tahsil Dhamdha, District Durg (C.G.). Naval Singh S/o Maharafhi. Dayaraia S/o Late Maharathi Bisesar S/o Late MaharatM Namin Bai D/o Late Maharathi Kisun s/o late Makhan Thakurram S/o Late Makhan. Smt. Bisektia Bai D/o Late Makhan Smt. Bisni Bai D/o Late Makhan Smt. Sawana Bai wd/o Late Gaindu Gond Tomaii Lal S/o Late Gaindu Gond. Taineshwar s/o late Gaindu Gond. No. 2 tQ 12 R/o vmage Pagbandhi, District Dm'g (C.G.). Ukha Bai w/o Shobhit (D/o Gaindu) Gond, R/o viUage Gadabhata, Tahsil Saja, Post Mohtara, District D.urg (C.G.). Mansukha Bai D/o Gaindu Gond, R/o vUlage Smghanpuri, TahsU Lohara, Post Singhanpuri, District Diirg (C.G.). Anusuiya Bai D/o Gaindu Gond, R/o village Thakurtola, Post Pailimeta, Tahsil Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.). Rajni Bai D/o Gaindu Gond, R/o village Gandai, Kopebhata, Post & Tahsil Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.). Sham Bai D/o late Roopbati Bai Gond, R/o viUage Pagbandhi, Post Rajpur, TahsU Dhamdha, District Durg (C.G.). Ganesh S/o late Suhavan Bai Amaru S/o late Suhavan Bai, Both 18 & 19 R/o village Deurgaon, Tahsil Saja, Post Deurgaon, District Durg (C.G.). Ranijeevan. S/o late Raniu Gond, R/o y'y^- ^ ^" fi. ' / . i ^ s y iy ^- 21. 22. village Pagbandhi, Tahsil Dhamdha, District Durg (C.G.). Parma Bai D/o Late Ramu Gond, R/o village Pagbandhi, Tahsil Dhamdha, District Durg (W/o Hariram Gond, R/o village Berla). State of Chhattisgarh, through Collector Durg, DistrictDurg (C.G.). CIVIL REVISION UNDER SECTION 115 OF THE CODE OF CFVIL PROCEDURE. (SB sHon'ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present- Shri Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate for fhe applicaiit, Shri U.K.S. Chandel, P.L. for the State/respondent No. 22. 3. 4. 5 6. ORAL ORDER (Passedon 30/09/2010) This civil revision against. the order dated 6/8/2010 passed by 5th Civil Judge Class-II, Durg in civil suit No. l-A/2009. During fhe course of argument, leai'ned counsel for the applicant submits that he seeks to wifhdraw fhis civil revision. Prayer is allowed. Consequently, civil revision is dismissed as withdrawn. All mt-erim applications are also dismissed. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge n^