1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2808 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2397 OF 2004 Smt. Jiravati Rammurti Shukla ..Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents. .... Mr. S.D. Thokade for the petitioner. Mr. S.R. Nargolkar, AGP for respondent Nos.1 and 3. Mr. R.C. Dhru for respondent Nos.2 and 4. .... CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ. 23rd November, 2004. P.C. : 1. Rule, made returnable forthwith. Learned counsel for the respondents waive service. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents. 2. Perused the Civil Application. For the reasons stated therein, sufficient cause is made out for recall of our order dated 19th October, 2004 dismissing the petition in default. There is no inaction, negligence or want of bonafides on the part of the 2 petitioner. In these circumstances, rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b). 3. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 4 states that no coercive steps will be adopted until 29th November, 2004. Place the writ petition for admission on 29th November, 2004. S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.