IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43338 of 2009 MUKESH MAHTO SON OF MAHENDRA MAHTO R/O VILLAGE- KACHIYANA, P.S.- LAKHISARAI, DISTRICT- LAKHISARAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 01/02/2010 Heard Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. The petitioner is one of the named accused of a case registered under Sections 302/34, 323, 324 and 341 of the Indian Penal Code. Many persons are named accused but allegation against the petitioner is that he has stabbed the informant’s son upon his chest. Post mortem examination report is annexure-1 which shows that the deceased has died on account of injury caused by sharp cutting weapon. That injury was attributed only to the petitioner. Submission is that other accused persons have been admitted to bail. Though there is allegation against other accused persons also but it is the petitioner who had given fatal blow to the informant’s son. Considering the above facts, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. 2 However, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail before the learned court below after examination of the informant during trial. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)