IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1176 OF 2008 PETITION NO. 1176 OF 2008 PETITION NO. 1176 OF 2008 Mohammed Sadiq Dastagir Shaikh ] .. Petitioner Versus 1. Estate Manager (5), MHADA & 3 ors. ] .. Respondents Mr. U.A. Kohir for the petitioner. Mr. G.W. Mattos, AGP, for the respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Pradip Jadhav, AGP, for the respondent No.4. CORAM: S.B. MHASE & A.A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. DATED: 18TH JUNE, 2008 P.C. : 1. The learned Assistant Government Pleader makes a statement that the communication dated 26th March, 2008, at Exhibit-I to the Petition is not pertaining to the property of the petitioner and it is not even addressed to the petitioner. He further states that the petitioner’s structure will not be touched and that the petitioner’s structure will be dealt with by following due process of law. 2. The aforesaid statements made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader are accepted. In view of : 2 : the said statements, the learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the Writ Petition. 3. Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and stands disposed of accordingly. Sd/- Sd/- [A.A. [A.A. [A.A. KUMBHAKONI, J.] KUMBHAKONI, J.] KUMBHAKONI, J.] [S.B. [S.B. [S.B. MHASE, J.] MHASE, J.] MHASE, J.]