IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2305 of 2011 RAJIV KUMAR SINGH SON OF MANAN SINGH, RESIDENT OF DIGHWALIA, P.S. RAGHUNATHPUR, DISTRICT SIWAN …. PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. BINAY RAI SON OF YOGENDRA SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MADHOPUR, P.S. RASULPIR, DISTRICT SARAN, CHAPRA ….. OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 2. 24.2.2011 The petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 4.8.2010 passed in Sessions Trial No.7 of 2009, by which the Additional Sessions Judge 1st, Siwan has allowed an application of one Binay Rai for examination of some witnesses. The history of the case is that initially the sister-in- law of the deceased filed a case against the husband of the deceased and other family members for the murder of Pushpa Devi. Thereafter one Binay Rai, who happened to be the brother of Pushpa Devi filed a complaint, which was merged with the original F.I.R. and the Investigating Officer had been given a direction to examine the witnesses named in the complaint despite which he did not examine those witnesses. When the case came up for trial, the Sessions Judge considering this background allowed examination of the witnesses for the just decision of the case and I find no reason to disagree with the trial court. In view of such, the application is dismissed. However, the trial court is directed to ensure completion of trial within a period of six months from the date of receipt of - 2 - this order. Let the order be communicated to the court of Additional Sessions Judge 1st, Siwan in connection with Sessions Trial No.7 of 2009 through fax at the cost of the petitioner. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )