HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH W.P.NO.10285 OF 2000 Dt.25.11.2010 Between: G.K.Prabhavathi ..Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Secretary, Education Dept., and others ..Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH W.P.NO.10285 OF 2000 ORDER: The case of the petitioner is that she was appointed as S.G.B.T Teacher in the 4th respondent school and the 4th respondent has submitted voluntary retirement proposals for retirement of the petitioner with effect from 29.2.1996 vide proceedings No.99 dated 4.2.2000 with a request to approve the same. But the said proposal was not accepted and the respondents have not permitted the petitioner to retire from service with effect from 29.2.1996 and the pensionary benefits have not been released. This writ petition was filed on 6.5.2000. A counter affidavit ha been filed on behalf of respondents 1 to 3 stating that the 4th respondent submitted voluntary proposals with effect from 29.2.1996 in respect of the petitioner vide proceedings No.99, dated 4.2.2000 with a request to approve the same. The District Educational Officer, Hyderabad vide letter dated 20.10.2000 sought clarification from the Commissioner/ Director of School Education, Hyderabad, as to whether the order of the 4th respondent in permitting the petitioner to voluntary retirement with retrospective effect i.e., 29.2.1996 can be ordered. The Director of School Education has given clarification to permit the petitioner to go on voluntary retirement with retrospective effect i.e., from 29.2.1996 vide proceedings in Rc.No.1687/B2- 3, dated 17.11.2000, and accordingly the said orders have been counter signed and sent to the petitioner through the 4th respondent vide proceedings of the District Educational Officer dated 15.12.2000 with a request to submit the pension papers. The said counter was filed as long back as on 31.1.2001. Therefore, as the petitioner was permitted to retire voluntarily with a request to submit pension papers, nothing survives in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. 25.11.2010 kpr