IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 18TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 27TH BHADRA 1931 WP(C).No. 15534 of 2005(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.B.OMANA, SALES GIRL, PANDANAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO. A 42, PANDANAD P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, CHENGANNUR. 3. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, CHENGANNUR. 4. PANDANAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.A 42, PANDANAD P.O., ALAPPUZHA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. ADV. SRI.K.P.RAJEEVAN FOR R4 G.P. SMT.SUDHA DEVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18.9.2009 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P(C).No.15534 of 2005 ================== Dated this the 18th day of September, 2009 J U D G M E N T After arguing for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to pursue Ext.P7 review petition filed by the petitioner against Ext.P6 order passed subsequent to filing of the writ petition. Permission is granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to pursue Ext.P7 review petition against Ext.P6 order. I make it clear that I have not considered any of the contentions on merits and it is entirely for the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P7 in accordance with law. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge