FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Criminal Revision Application No.340 of 2005 ------------------------------------:----------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:------------------------------------ Mr.P.J.Shinde for applicant. Mr.J.G.Reddy for res.Nos.1 to 3. ---- CORAM : H.L GOKHALE & CORAM : H.L GOKHALE & CORAM : H.L GOKHALE & SMT.R.S.DALVI, JJ. SMT.R.S.DALVI, JJ. SMT.R.S.DALVI, JJ. DATED : 24th October 2005 DATED : 24th October 2005 DATED : 24th October 2005 P.C. : 1. Heard Mr.Shinde in support of this Application. Mr.Reddy appears for respondent Nos.1 to 3. 2. The trial Court has enhanced the maintenance amount payable to the 1st respondent-wife and two children. The burden under that order comes to in all Rs.3,500/-, which is just over Rs.100/- per day for three persons. Mr.Shinde submits that the respondents are staying in a rural area. Even in rural area like Khandala-Pargaon, this much expenditure would be definitely required. The applicant’s income was Rs.8867/- per month in February 2002. He is showing many deductions. That is a matter for him to look into. On such grounds the basic requirements of a lady and two children cannot be ignored. We do not find that the Court was, in any way, in error in enhancing the maintenance amount. Petition is rejected. (H.L.GOKHALE, J.) (H.L.GOKHALE, J.) (H.L.GOKHALE, J.) (SMT.R.S.DALVI, J.) (SMT.R.S.DALVI, J.) (SMT.R.S.DALVI, J.)