'^ RESPONDENT! HIGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH: BiLASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 3924 of 2007 Narendra Shrivastava, son of Shri B.L. Shrivastava, aged about 49 years, occupation-Ser/tee. Presentiy posted as Assistant Grade 1, in Dlrectorate, Higher Education, Raipur, resident of h4D- 264, Hirapur, Raipur Vsrsus 1) 2'! State of Chhattlsgarh, through the Secretar/, Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. The Commiss'ioner, Higher Education, Raipur. it Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of indla) SB: Hon'bie Mr. Justice Satish K. Aanihotri Fresent: Shri RajeevShrivastava, c&unselforthe Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, Govt. Advocate for the State. (Passedon13th Ju!y,2007) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner beionas to Directorate service as he was oosted as Assistant Grade -I in the Directorate, Hlgher Education, Raipur. Vide impugned order dated 29-6-2007 (Annexure P/4), the petitioner has been transferred to the office of Additionai Director, Jagdaipur. Learned counset further submits that a separate gradation list is maintained in the office of the Additionai Director and his seniority may be effected by transfer as his substantive ^ppointment is in the office or Directorate, Hiaher Education, Raipur. 2) Be that as it may, iearned counsel appearing for the rsspondents/State submits that if the petitioner files a representation before the respondent BSS'" •^ :fE! \ raju •'i.- authority pointing out the defects in the impugned order, the same shail be considered and decided , in accordance with taw, within a period of two weeks. 3) !n view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of. However, the placement of t'ne petitioner shai! not be disturbed for a period of too weeks or ti decision on the representation. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge