IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10446 of 2010 ASHOK TANTI, Son of Permeshwar Tanti, R/o Suturkhana, P.S. Muffasil, District Munger ………… Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …… Opposite Party ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Mr. Raj Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Mr. Uma Shankar Pd. Singh, A.P.P. ----- 2 02.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. This is a case of misuse of privilege of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner’s prayer for adjournment was rejected on 8.6.2006 and his bail bonds were cancelled. It is stated that from the next date i.e. 12.7.2006, the petitioner remained absent. It is further stated that the petitioner has surrendered on 25.7.2009. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner undertakes that he will remain present on each and every date during the course of trial. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, ASHOK TANTI, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties 2 of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. III, Munger, in connection with S.Tr. No. 986 of 2004 arising out of Muffasil P.S. Case No. 51 of 2001, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be a close relative or family member of the petitioner, who shall file affidavit before the concerned court giving complete genealogy to show his or her relationship with the petitioner. Further, the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of trial. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation then the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)