IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 9181 of 2004 Between: 1 Mr. C. Venkatreddy, S/o. Late Sri Narayan Reddy, H.No. 16-2-705/8/2/A, Akbarbagh, Malakpet, Hyderabad. 2 Dr. C. Vimala, W/o. Sri C. Venkat Reddy, H.No. 16-2-705/8/2/A, Akbarbagh, Malakpet, Hyderabad. 3 Mr. M. Gopal Reddy, S/o. Late Sri Narasimha Reddy, H.No. 16-2-705/8/2/A, Akbarbagh, Malakpet, Hyderabad. 4 Smt. M. Nanditha Reddy, W/o. Sri Gopal Reddy, H.No. 16-2-705/8/2/A, Akbarbagh, Malakpet, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1. M/s. S.V.Saicharan Builders, a partnership firm represented by its managing partner Sri P.Upender, S/o.Sri P.Nagabushanam, having its office at No.3, Second floor, S.V.Plaza, M.I.G.H. 10, Santhoshnagar, Hyderbad and also at 17-1-383/46 And 46/1, in Plot No.46, Saidabad, Hyderabad. 2. Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, represented by its Commissioner, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad Circle No.I. 3. Mr. Subramaian Sundaram, S/o.Sri V.Subramaian, aged about 68 years, occupation: retired service, r/o.16-2-148/A, Malakpet, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to grant an order, direction, writ more so in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring, writ more so in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the inaction of the respondent No. 1 on the representation of the petitioners dated 27-4-2004 against the deviations committed by the respondents 1 and 3 from the sanction plan in the construction over the land in House No. 17-1-383/46 and 46/1, in Plot No. 46, saidabad, Hyderabad is highhanded, illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No. 2 to act upon the representation of the petitioners dated 27-4-2004. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.P.PRATAP REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.2: MR.THIMMA REDDY The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. _____________ 28-09-2004 vs . To 1. The Managing Partner Sri P.Upender, S/o.Sri P.Nagabushanam, M/s. S.V.Saicharan Builders, a partnership firm, having its office at No.3, Second floor, S.V.Plaza, M.I.G.H. 10, Santhoshnagar, Hyderbad and also at 17-1-383/46 And 46/1, in Plot No.46, Saidabad, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad Circle No.I. 3. 2CD copies