IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 17TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 28TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 3453 of 2011(F) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M.AHANAS.DIYA GARDENS, LAKE DARSAN NAGAR-56, VADAKKUMBHAGOM, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, POLICE HEADQUARTERS, KOLLAM-1. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOLLAM EAST POLICE STATION, KOLLAM-1. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOLLAM EAST POLICE STATION, KOLLAM-1. 4. THE DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER, COLLECTORATE, CIVIL LINES, KOLLAM-13. 5. THE ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER, II CIRCLE, CIVIL LINES, KOLLAM-13. 6. SRI.IQUBAL, SECRETARY, LOADING- UNLOADING AND GENERAL WORKERS UNION, C.I.T.U., MUKKADA BAZAR, KOLLAM-1. 7. SRI.SURESH BABU, CONVENER, LOADING-UNLOADING AND GENERAL WORKERS UNION, C.I.T.U., PLRATHIBHA JUNCTION, KADAPPAKKADA P.O., KOLLAM-8. 8. SRI.RAJU, SECRETARY, HEADLOAD WORKERS UNION, A.I.T.U.C.COUNCIL OFFICE, KADAPPAKKADA P.O., KOLLAM-8. WPC.3453/11 2 9. SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN, CONVENOR, A.I.U.C. TOWN LIMITE UNIT, KADAPPAKKADA P.O., KOLLAM-8. R1 TO R5 BY GOVT. PLEDER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS R8, R9 BY ADV. SRI.SAJU J.VALLYARA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P(C).3453/11 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE BUILDING PERMIT NO.PW4/BA.103/1011 DATED 4.12.2010 ISSUED BY KOLLAM CORPORATION TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT AND ITS RECEIPT. /TRUE COPY/ THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JJ. ----------------------------------- W.P(C).No.3453 OF 2011 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 17th day of February, 2011 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for respondents 8 and 9 as also learned Government Pleader. Learned counsel for respondents 8 and 9 says that his clients are not objecting to any construction activity of the petitioner. This is recorded. Learned Government Pleader submits that necessary protection can be provided to the petitioner if there is law and order situation. Accordingly, we direct that the petitioner will be given adequate protection to have his works carried out through workmen of his choice since the area is not covered by any scheme under the Kerala Headload Workers Act. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. Sd/- S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, Judge. kkb.18/2.