IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.200 of 2007 ---- Smt. Ina R.Patel Wife of Shri Rasik Bhai Patel, Resident of “Lakshmi Niwas” Bakerganj, Gola Road, P.S. Pirbahore, District-Patna. -- Defendant-Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Madhukar Shyam 2. Shri Sudhakar Shyam. Both sons of Late Ramesh Prasad and residents of Mohalla- Nageshwar Colony, Boring Road, P.S. Buddha Colony, District- Patna. -- Plaintiffs-Opposite parties. ----- For the petitioner : M/s. Prem Kumar Verma and Sunil Srivastava, Advocates. For the opposite parties: None. ---- 03. 03.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. This civil revision has been filed by the defendant- petitioner challenging order dated 28.11.2006 by which the learned Munsif III, Patna rejected his petition dated 20.07.2006 under Order XI Rule 14 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for directing the plaintiffs to produce all the earlier lease deeds executed by them in favour of the defendant –petitioner and her husband in respect of the suit premises since 1969 till 2002 in Eviction Suit No.24 of 2004. 3. The aforesaid suit was filed by the plaintiffs-opposite parties for eviction of the defendant-petitioner on two grounds, namely their bonafide personal requirement as well as expiry of fixed period of lease dated 01.08.2003. 4. It transpires that during the pendency of the suit, the - 2 - aforesaid application was filed by the defendant for a direction to the plaintiffs to produce all the lease deeds executed by the plaintiffs in favour of the defendant and her husband before the execution of the aforesaid deed of lease dated 01.08.2003. The said application has been rejected by the learned court below by the impugned order holding that the question of expiry of fixed period of lease would be decided on the basis of the lease deed dated 01.08.2003 and the earlier deeds, if any, would not be necessary for deciding the suit and hence there is no requirement for directing the plaintiffs to produce other so-called lease deeds which have no bearing in the instant suit which has to be decided on the basis of genuineness or otherwise of the lease deed dated 01.08.2003 along with question of bonafide personal requirement of the plaintiffs. 5. This court does not find any illegality or jurisdictional error in the impugned order of the learned court below. Accordingly, this civil revision is dismissed with a direction to the learned court below to expedite the disposal of the eviction suit. Sunil (S. N. Hussain, J.)