THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.3440 of 2011 Dated 08th December, 2011 Between: Kalikiri Munaswamy (died) rep.by his LRs. …Petitioners And The Revenue Divisional Officer/Land Acquisition Officer, Madanapalle Division, Chittoor District and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri J.Ugra Narasimha Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 3: AGP for Land Acquisition Counsel for respondent Nos.2 & 4: Sri S.V.Ramana for Sri O.Manohar Reddy The Court made the following: ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. The petitioners, who claim interest over the land admeasuring Ac.0.58 cents in Survey No.237/1 and Ac.0.41 cents in Survey No.238/2B of Thimmanayunipalle Village, Sodam Mandal, Chittoor District, filed this writ petition feeling aggrieved by the action of the respondents in utilising the said land without acquiring the same. At the hearing, the learned counsel for the respondents stated that only the extent of Ac.0.58 cents in Survey No.237/1 is being utilised for construction of sub-station and that the other extent of land, namely, Ac.0.41 cents in Survey No.238/2B, is not being utilised. This submission of the learned counsel is not controverted by Sri J.Ugra Narasimha, learned counsel for the petitioners. As regards Ac.0.58 cents of land, Sri S.V.Ramana, learned counsel, representing Sri O.Manohar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for APCPDCL-respondent No.2 herein, submitted that his client has already deposited a sum of Rs.24,14,500/- on 07.10.2011 for the extent of Acs.5.22 cents, which includes Ac.0.58 cents, which is the subject matter of the writ petition with respondent No.1 with a request to the latter to initiate acquisition proceedings. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he has no objection if such acquisition proceedings are initiated. In the light of the above submissions of the learned counsel, respondent No.1 is directed to immediately initiate acquisition proceedings. If the petitioners have any claim over the land, they shall be free to put forth their claims in the proposed acquisition proceedings. Subject to the above direction and observation, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.4253 of 2011 and W.V.M.P.No.1469 of 2011 are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 08th December, 2011 VGB