FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CA/6459/2010 BHAIRAVNATH V/S STATE 1. Heard. 2. By the present application, delay of (29) days, occurred in filing the review petition has been sought to be condoned. 3. Shri Godbharale, learned AGP vehemently opposed grant of the application that the delay has not been properly explained and no grounds have been made out for grant of the application 4. After hearing learned counsel for the respective parties, in our opinion, the delay has been properly explained in the civil application. It is not intentional one. There are no laches on the part of applicant. 5. In the interest of justice, the application is allowed. Delay stands condoned. (S.S.SHINDE, J.) (S.B.DESHMUKH, J.) Dt.2.8.2010 akl