1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.306 OF 2004 IN APPEAL NO.469 OF 1994 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3169 OF 1989 IN SUIT NO.3649 OF 1989 Tukaram Raghunath Kini & Anr. .. Appellant. V/s. Bharatsingh Singh Kuber Singh Thakur (since deceased) & Ors. .. Respondents. And Pravin Bharatsingh Thakur & Ors. .. Proposed Respdt for deceased Respondent No.1 And Manohar Atmaram Mhatre & Ors. .. Proposed Respdt for deceased Respondent No.5. Ms.J.N. Pandhi i/b. Mahesh Jani & Co. for the appellants. Ms.U.K. Shah i/b. K.D. Shah for respondent Nos.1 & 3. Mr.Navin Parekh for respondent Nos.5 and 6. CORAM : R.M. LODHA, & CORAM : R.M. LODHA, & CORAM : R.M. LODHA, & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 21ST SEPTEMBER, 2004. DATED : 21ST SEPTEMBER, 2004. DATED : 21ST SEPTEMBER, 2004. P.C. : . By consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the chamber summons is granted in terms of 2 prayers (a), (b), (c) and (d). 2. Prayer (a), (b), (c) and (d) reads thus : ‘(a) Delay of 523 days in taking out the present chamber summons be condoned. (b) That the Appellants be allowed to substitute Respondents Nos.1(a) to 1(f) in place and stead of Original Respondent No.1 as per Schedule annexed to the Chamber Summons herein. (c) that the Appellants be allowed to substitute Respondents Nos.5(A) to 5(d) be substituted in place and stead of Original Respondent No.5 as per Schedule annexed to the Chamber Summons herein. (d) The Appellants herein be allowed to carry out consequential amendments as per the abovementioned Schedule.’ 3. Necessary amendment be carried out in the appeal within two weeks from today. 4. Post the appeal for hearing after two weeks. 5. The chamber summons stands disposed of. (R.M. LODHA, J.) (R.M. LODHA, J.) (R.M. LODHA, J.) 3 (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)