1 upa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.2111 OF 2000 SUMMARY SUIT NO.2111 OF 2000 SUMMARY SUIT NO.2111 OF 2000 Alka G. Pariani ).. Plaintiff Versus Bombay News Agency ).. Defendants Mr.Pratap B. Kapadia for the Plaintiff. None present for the Defendants. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 20TH MARCH 2006 DATED : 20TH MARCH 2006 DATED : 20TH MARCH 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The Plaintiff has filed the present Summary Suit on the Demand Bill of Exchange issued by Defendant No.1 drawn in favour of the Plaintiff on 13th August 1996 for the amount of Rs.1,00,000/-. Further consideration on two Demand Bills of Exchange was paid being Rs.25,000/- each. It appears that the amount of Rs.1,50,000/- was sought by the Plaintiff from the Defendants on several occasions. In spite of notice, the Defendants has failed to repay the amount. Hence, this Summary Suit. 2. The Plaintiff has filed an affidavit of service and the documents on which she relies on. There is no appearance filed by the Defendants. 2 3. The Suit has been filed claiming an amount of Rs.2,26,500/- along with further interest on the principal amount @ 18% per annum. The documents filed on record by the Plaintiff supports the case of the Plaintiff made out in the Plaint. There is no defence to the claim made by the Plaintiff. 4. In view of this, the Suit is decreed as prayed for. 5. Refund as per Rules.