IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.110 OF 2008 Mohd. Rafiq Allahbaksh Sayyad and Ors. ...Petitioners. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.Amit Sale, adv. For the Petitioners. Ms. Sharmila Deshmukh, adv. For the Respondent No.2. Mrs.S.V.Bharucha, adv. for the Respondent No.4. Mr.C.S.Balsara i/by A.S.Dayal & Associates, adv. for the Respondent No.6. Mrs.Shobha Ajit Kumar, adv. for the Respondent No.3. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : 17th February , 2010. P.C. 1 Affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent no.2 pointing out certain violations in the matter of debris clearance and a boundary wall and that the Government land has been used temporarily for storing construction equipments. It is also set out that the proposed re-construction/re-development is being carried out on the seaward side , and it is necessary to obtain permission from the Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority. 2 Respondent No.6 has put his appearance points out that they are only rent collectors on behalf of the rent receiver. They have no interest so far as the development on the plot is concerned. However, - 2 - considering the affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent no.2, Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority, they are directed to pursue the matter and take steps if ultimately wall is being put up without necessary permission. 3 With the above observations, Public Interest Litigation stands disposed. (J.H. BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)