THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No :1829 of 2008 DATED:24.06.2011 Between: B.Kadirivelu. ..... PETITIONER And R.Santhamma & another. .....RESPONDENTS ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order, dated 03.04.2008, in C.M.A.No.31 of 2007 on the file of the learned II Additional District Judge, Madanapalle, wherein the said appeal filed by the respondents herein, was allowed and the order, dted 20.09.2007, in I.A.No.907 of 2005 in O.S.No.193 of 2007 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Madanapalle, granting temporary injunction in favour of the plaintiff, was set aside. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. Perused the record. 3. Petitioner herein filed the suit against the respondents for a permanent injunction against the respondents restraining them from making any construction over the plaint schedule property. Along with the suit he filed I.A.No.907 of 2007 under Order XXXIX Rule 1 CPC for grant of temporary injunction and an ex parte injunction was granted. Respondents- defendants filed a counter opposing the same. After due enquiry, the learned Senior Civil Judge, Madanapalle by order, dated 20.09.2007, allowed I.A.No.907 of 2007 and made the interim injunction absolute. Aggrieved by the same, respondents herein-defendants filed C.M.A.No.31 of 2007 before the learned II Additional District Judge, Madanapalle. By the impugned order, the said appeal was allowed and the temporary injunction granted by the learned Senior Civil Judge was set aside. Hence, the present revision by the petitioner herein. 4. Initially, on 28.04.2008, status quo was directed to be maintained till the date of hearing. Subsequently, the said order of status quo was not extended. It is to be seen that the main suit itself is one for permanent injunction and it was filed in the year, 2007. The various aspects pertaining to the alleged title and possession in respect of the suit property that fall for consideration in the present proceedings would arise for consideration in the main suit also. Hence, at this length of time, four years after filing of the suit, it is considered imprudent to go into the merits of the case by way of interlocutory proceedings and on the other hand it would be in the interest of justice if the trial of the suit itself is directed to be taken up. The learned Senior Civil Judge is therefore directed to dispose of the suit within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such time, status quo obtaining as on today in respect of the suit schedule property shall be maintained by both parties. 5. Civil Revision Petition is disposed of with the above direction. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY,J 24th June, 2011. Tsy