BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Nineteenth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.13701 of 2011 SANJAY ANAND : PETITIONER/ACCUSED-1 Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, MADURAI. CRIME NO.30/2011 : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.VIJAYASHANTHI Advocate For Respondent : Mr. K.S.DURAIPANDI Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest, at the hands of the respondent police, the petitioner, who is the first accused, in Crime No.30 of 2011 on the file of the respondent Police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, has come forward with this Petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of the prosecution, the petitioner was running a company under the name and style of M/s Jennys Information Technology (P) Limited in Bangalore. The de facto complainant wanted to join in the said company. Therefore he paid Rs.7 lakhs to the petitioner in the year June 2005. Thereafter, he came to know that he was not added as a partner in the said company. Instead, the money was also not returned. 3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the de facto complainant is neither a partner nor a proprietor of the company and he did not pay a sum of Rs.7 lakhs at all. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. Having regard to the above fact that money is allegedly paid in the year 2005 and whereas, the complaint is preferred in the year 2011. It is a disputed question as to whether any money was really paid or not. Thus, the petitioner has made out a prima facie case, and so I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with the following conditions. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, No.I, Madurai, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police, at 10.30 a.m for a period of four weeks. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. Sd/- 19/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.1 MADURAI. 2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, MADURAI. +1 CC to M/S. S.VIJAYASHANTHI Advocate SR.No.36386 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13701 of 2011 Date :19/10/2011 NSV/21.10.11/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/