-•>. 'etition (SS No. 3928 of 2007 PETI 1) 2) 3) Rajkumar Patei, S/o. Shri IViakhan Lal Patsl, Aged about 45 years, Upper Division Teacher, Government High Schoo! Mahioi, Block - Pusour, District - Raigarh (CG). State of Chhaiiisgarh, through the Secretary, Schoo! Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, CG. The District Education Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh, (CG). The Block Education Officer. Block Pusour, Dlstrict - Raigarh (CG). ~lj (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri Present: Shri Sanjay Patsl, counsei for the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Go*»'t.Advocate for ths State. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner as weii as for the State/resDondents iointiv submit that the fact and question of law Invoived in t'ne present writ petitlon are the same to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another { 200S (ii) MPJR -CQ 96}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 3-4-2006. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents does not controvert the said submsssion. E —2-- In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (S) No. 4139 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Verma Vs. The State Govt of Chhattisgarh and another) and other connected matters, decided by this Court on 15-12-2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Dipioma in Education Examination, it was ciarified that the nomenclature ofthe Basic Training institute i.e., B.T.L, has been changed and renamed as Dipioma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S) No. 4130 of 2005 (Qopesh Kumar Vsrms Vs. The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and another (supra). Accordlngly, the writ petition is aliowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipai Corporation, Durg and another (supra), subject to venflcatlon of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired D.Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per the cireutars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further whether he has been pa'd two advance increments or not. No orderastocosts, Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge