IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8613 of 2011 MITHILESH MAHTO, S/o Shivajee Mahto. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 25.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the arms were recovered from the house of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is made clear that the petitioner’s case will not be considered if he is solely charged. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)