IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20843 of 2009 CHITRANJAN SINGH @ RAUSHAN KUMAR @ CHITRANJAN KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 05.08.2009 Heard both sides. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 365 and 379 of Indian Penal Code. The truck loaded with purtune articles was proceeding from Kolkata to Nepal. After the truck crossed Muzaffarpur, it was found abandoned on the road. The articles loaded thereon were missing. F.I.R., therefore, has been lodged against unknown. Learned counsel submits that in course of investigation, the police traced the print outs of the mobile phone of the driver. It has been found that he talked on two mobile phones It is said that one Roushan Kumar, s/o- Ashok Kumar Singh is the owner of one mobile phone. The police, on the basis of investigation, has come to a conclusion that petitioner is also known as Roushan Kumar. Learned counsel submits that except this, there is nothing on record. It is contended that the parentage of Roushan Kumar was wrongly found recorded in the case diary. In fact the petitioner is known by one name i.e. Chitranjan and his father’s name is late Rajendra Singh. It is contended that on these materials, he is in custody since 26.1.2009. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., West, Muzaffarpur in connection with Kanti P.S. case no. 07 of 2009 subject to the condition that one of the bailers will be own/close family member of the petitioner. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )