IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No. 1496 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 9, 2010 Union of India and others …Appellants Versus Smt. Bimla Devi …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present: Ms. Ranjana Shahi, Senior Panel Counsel, Union of India, for the appellants. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. This appeal under Clause X of the Letters Patent is directed against judgment dated 4.3.2010 rendered by the learned Single Judge holding that the writ petitioner-respondent was entitled to the benefit of Seema Prahari Beema Yozana, which have accrued to her due to death of her husband while he was on duty at the border. The matter is squarely covered by a Division Bench judgment of this Court rendered in the case of Smt. Raj Dulari v. Union of India and others (C.W.P. No. 2358 of 2008, decided on 10.11.2008, Annexure P-5). There is no reason for us to take a view different than the one taken by the Division Bench in the case of Smt. Raj Dulari (supra). Accordingly, the instant appeal fails and the same is dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (RITU BAHRI) November 9, 2010 JUDGE Pkapoor 2