:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 62 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 62 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 62 OF 2006 IN IN IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 44 OF 2006 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 44 OF 2006 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 44 OF 2006 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. A.M. Joshi for the applicant. CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATE : 18TH JULY, 2006 DATE : 18TH JULY, 2006 DATE : 18TH JULY, 2006 P.C. . Heard. 2. For the reasons stated in the application being sufficient cause is shown, in the interest of justice the litigants should not suffer of the mistake of Advocate, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b). With regard to the service position the applicant to pursue with the :2: Registry, who in turn shall ascertain whether service upon the respondents has already been effected. 3. Assuming that the respondents are already served by the Advocate’s notice, applicant to take steps to serve the said respondents afresh by Advocate’s notice in terms of order dated February 10, 2006. Notice returnable on 22nd August, 2006. ( A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.) ( A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.) ( A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.)