IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.790 of 2009 MD. JASIM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 6.5.2009 The learned counsel submits that the F.I.R. speaks that two boys,namely, Amit Kumar and Chhotu Pandit came and took away the son of the informant, namely, Rahul Pandit. The allegation against the petitioner is that he had subsequently come to the house of the informant and informed him that his son Rahul, would come back shortly. Further material is that the owner of the hotel stated that the deceased along with other persons went in a jeep of which the petitioner was khalasi. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. As such his prayer for bail is rejected. However, he may renew his prayer for bail after completing one year in custody. Anilkrsinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)