THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No. 24740 OF 2010 O R D E R: The question as to whether the answer scripts of students pursuing M.B.B.S. course have been properly valued or not by the subject experts, cannot be gone into by this Court, in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. But, however, upon a detailed consideration of the legal position, in Writ Petition No. 379 of 2008, by my Judgment, dated 16.04.2008, I have taken the view that the respondent University should constitute a redressal grievance mechanism of the students, comprising at least one subject expert, so that the issue whether the answer scripts of the students have received proper evaluation or not can be considered by such a committee. In view of the representation submitted by the writ petitioner herein on 24-09-2010, I direct the respondents to constitute a grievance redressal mechanism and refer the answer script of the writ petitioner for the subject Anatomy to the said committee, for it to examine whether the answer script of the writ petitioner has received proper evaluation or not and based upon the findings of the said committee, action considered appropriate may be taken by the respondents, duly intimating the same to the writ petitioner, within a maximum period of three weeks from today. The Writ Petition stands disposed of with the consent of the learned Standing Counsel Sri D.V. Nagarjuna Babu for the respondent University, at the admission stage. No costs. --------------------------------------- (NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J) 4th October 2010 ksld THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.17066 OF 2010 DATED: 20th July, 2010.