IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37861 of 2011 Rajiv Singh @ Babli Singh, S/O-Pawan Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02 29.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report nor anything has been recovered from his conscious possession. It appears from perusal of the impugned order as well as submissions of the parties that in course of investigation two witnesses claimed to have identified the petitioner but submission on behalf of the petitioner is that the aforesaid two witnesses are resident of different village and district and had they identified the petitioner at the time of the alleged occurrence, the name of petitioner would have certainly been given in the first information report. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Khagaria (Gangaur) P.S. Case No. 209 of 2011. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)