IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.356 of 2009 Date of decision:26.08.2009. Amarpreet Singh ...Petitioner Versus Punjab & Sind Bank and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH Present: Mr. Deepak Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** JASBIR SINGH, J. (ORAL). This writ petition has been filed to lay challenge to the notice dated 13.06.2007 (P-8). That notice was issued under the provisions of Securitization & Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, for getting possession, from the petitioner, of the mortgaged property. It is case of the petitioner that he had purchased the property for a valuable consideration. Be that as it may, before purchase of the property by the petitioner, it was mortgaged with the bank. In view of that position, the bank has a legal right to take possession of the property, if loan amount is not repaid. No case is case is made out for interference. Dismissed. However, the petitioner be at liberty to avail any other remedy, as per law. In case any appeal is filed within 15 days from today, the , bar of limitation be not raised against the petitioner. August 26, 2009. ( JASBIR SINGH ) vinod JUDGE