^^f'^^^^^sv^^^< rcro IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE. AT BILASPUR fC.G.l W.P.fSlNO. 6&3't 72006 PBTITIOBBR: ^^ ..-^ v ^^^•^y .••• ^"^/" . \'.-* y S-- Sukhram Slngh Sldar Son of, Shrl Parasram Sldar, aged about 40 years, Occupatlon- Asst. Teacher, Govt. Mlddle School Peparsattt, Block Akaltara Dtstt. Janjglr-champa (C.G.) '"y RESPOBDEBTS VERSUS l. State of Chhattlsgarh, through/ the Secretary Government of Chhattlsgarh Department of Educatlon, D.K.S. Bhawan Mantralaya, Ralpur (C.G.). 2. Dlrector Publlc Instructlon< Ralpur (C.G.) 3. Dlstrlct Educatlon Offlcer, Dlstt.-JanJglr Champa (C.G.) < 4. Block Educatlon Offlcer, Akaltara, Dlstt.- Janjglr Champa (C.G.) VUUT PCTmON UNEHER ARTKXE 226 /2W OF 11® coNSTnuneiN OF INDIA POR ISSUANCE OF AFTRCH'RIATE ^ 1 a XI-HC-78 sn^r %T R4J+ (W STI^T sbHI'+ *)THcn St»*Tl^l 3'Sg' "illlifll, at(lM'IS,.Rt<'ll'M'j< ri.a-.<vl/?..^ c3^ •<^>-^200 3n^?T'TaW('^g^8T) s^irwtri^rsTi^T 05.12.2006 Shri ft^ay Dwivedi, learn Shri Vinay Pandey, leanhed By this petition under the petitioner seeks a directioi|i and seniority on the basis of tl| of the decision rendered by Jabalpur in Original Applicatiof others Vs. aate of M.P. and flrticles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, to the respondents to pay the increments le date of his initial appointment in the light Ithe leamed State Administrative Tribunal, No. 2745/1989 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 c#iers)dated 24.8.1992 2. Leamed counsel appea order dated 9 October 2006 5473/2006 (Rakesh Kumar andothers) and in Writ Petitii State of Chhattisgarh and similarfy situated.therefore, th 3. The case of the petitioher Teacher in the Sehool Educati two years wth the fixed salary( years' probation, the petitionet) regular pay scale. Other sin')ilarly yiAdministrative Tribunal; Jabali>ur Tribunal vide order dated 24| made several representations ^)l^I<n41^ iTm^Tl* ^ ts^ <(fli't^R ^Stf^ITSn^T •d counsel for the petitioner. P.L. forthe State/respondent. 1-ing for the petitioner placed reliance on the [^assed bythis Court in Writ Petition (S) No. Sh^rma and anotherVs. Stateof Chhattisgarh ^n (S) No. 5474/2006 (Jai Nath Bajpai Vs. o|thers) and submits that the petitioner is similar order may be passed. is that he was appointed as Assistant t>n Department on probation for a period of However, later on, after completion oftwo was regularized but, he was not given the situated teachers moved the State for regular pay-scale, wherein leamed [8.1992 allowed the same. The petitioner to accord the same treatment as he is also ^. ^l XI-HC-78 sn^y w R-<i+ TOT an^r sbiiqi L- .-•'I: HIH^t Sh*)|tt» 3S? •<)NIC1t, ®Tn«1'|tS,fsflflMy ..^.e.^.^.U^. ^ 200 3TT^?T q^qi' (yt^6!^) WctTWS^cfsn^T similarly situated, but, the resfjondents have not paid any heed. Thus, this petition. 4. Leamed counsel for thj be allowed to make a repres^ntation treatment to the petitioner and| to other similarly situated tea( Administrative Tribunal dated respondent/State has no objecjtion. petitioner submits that the petitioner may to respondent No.1 to give similar |same pay-scale which has been sanctioned ;hers on account of the order of the State 124.8.1992, to which learned counset Tor the 5. Havirig heard learned the facts and circumstances limited prayer made by leami reasonable. Therefore, the pe within a period of tvro weeks grievances and, in tum, representation in an objective date of receipt of such repn raised by the petitioner and passed by the leamed State , No. 2745/1989. Certified copy as per ru|es tii'yfrt'fl-) inwTT ^ te<A <Rit<i< ^T3Tf^T3TI^T tjounsel for the parties and having regard to 4f the case, in the opinion of this Court, the id counsel for the p^itioner appears to be (itioner is atlowed to make a representation fijom today to respondent No.1, raising all his rjespondent No.1 shall decide the said |manner wthin a period of 30 days from the tsentation, after considering all the points ta|<ing into account the order dated 24.8.1992 Ajjministrative Tribunat inOriginal Appiication 6. The wit petition is a4cordingly disposed of with the aforesaid direction. No order as to costs.1 Sd/- Dhirednra Mishra Judge ^ 'v ^