WRIT PETITION (C) No. wabof 2010 m g‘i ‘l 5g“ eaa 1 . Bal sham A ocity registered é incorated unr Socet egisrikaran hiniyam, 93, havig Ad 17 n registered office a Ker Chowk, Raipur, Represented throuh the Seetary, Shtilal Parakh, Son of L P es ate M.L. arakh, Rident ' of Kutchy’ Cho, Bal Ashra Cus, Raipur C..) (G 2. Shantilal Parak, S/o a h Lte ML Res o .. Parakh, ident f Kuthery Cwk, Bal Aram aus, Rai (C.G. c ho sh Cmp pur ) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattsarh Thrgh : The Sectary Firms and Societie 8 commerc D.K.S. Bhan, R CG) D a p aipur (.. Mr. K.K. Baxy y Coilector nd administrator apointed f al u or B Ashram, Raipr (C.G.) . Regisar, Firms 85 Societ, 0—5, Anupam Nagar, Raipur (C'.G.) r R (G 4. The Collecto, aipur C..) INTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONERS Ar Se an orp de iy Rt t utchy g cr an er wk m amp ig . ou re s ; e, aw 3 tr y WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA RESPONDENTS _ l r ‘ State of Chhattisgarh & Others I (WritP‘etition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench Hon ble Shn Satlsh K Agnlhotn J ' r‘eSent:-r V Shrl Gautam Bhadun Advocate With Shn Ashlsh Surana w Advocate for the petitioners ‘ Shri M PS Bhatia Dy Govt Advocate forthe State Shri Panka] Shrivastava Advocate for the respondent No 2 Shri N K Vyas Shri R K Keshanivani and Shri R K Mishr _ Advocates for the respective interveners e The instant petition, in fact, seeks compliance of the order dated 22-7-2010 (Annexure — P/12) passed by this Court in Goku/ Das Daga v. State of Chhattisga‘fh and Others1 and othef cOnneéted writ petition. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the State as well as learnedcounsel appearing for the respondent No.2 submit that they are complying with the order dated 22-7-2010 passed by this Court t‘strictly, ih its letter & spirit for holding elections on the basis of lmembers enrolled earlier prior to the appointment of new administrator; .Notices for holding elections have already been issued. On account of misrepresentation made by the petitioners in the present petition, the election proceedings have been stayed by this Court on 28-8-2010. ‘h ln view of foregoing, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of‘the parties, the Registrar is permitted to hold elections in accordance with the order'dated 22-7—'2010 passed by this Court in 1 WP (C) No.6290 of 2008 HIGH COURT‘OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NO 4882 OF 2010 PETITIONE'RS Bal Ashram & Another Versus _ ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 4‘ day of December 2010) Heard learned counsel forthe parties P a Gokul Das Daga‘(s,upra) and other connected .matter, as early as possible upholding .the democratic system, which is the basic foundatio’n of governance in India. Learned counsel appearing for the State as weli as Iearned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2 submit that the election shall be conducted within a period of four week‘s in accordance with law. Since the notices have been issued to hold elections strictly in compliance of the order dated 22-7—2010, as submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the appearing for the State as well as 'learnedrcounsel appearing for the respondent No.2, it is not necessary to entertain this petition, at this stage Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to take recourse to proper forum, if the Vorder dated 22-7-2010 passed by this Court in Gokul Das Daga (supra) and other connected matte has not been complied with in its letter and spirit. Sd/— Judge ll l ¢ Satish K. Agnihotri :1‘: ’ '