IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA C.W.P. No.7006 of 2010 Date of decision: 7.1.2011 ------------------------------------------------- Narender. Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others. Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, J. Whether approved for reporting1? No. For the petitioners: Mr.Navlesh Verma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. J.S.Guleria, Asstt. Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 4. Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, counsel for respondent No. 5. V.K.Ahuja (Oral). Private respondent (respondent No.5) had filed a writ petition challenging her transfer from Govt. Senior Secondary School, Hamirpur to Govt. Senior Secondary School, Bharwain vide order dated 21.5.2010. The writ petition No.2963 of 2010 was decided by the learned Single Judge on 6.9.2010 directing the first respondent to consider the writ petition as a representation made by respondent No.1 (present petitioner) and disposed of the same accordingly. 2. Her grievance is that the present petitioner who was respondent in that case has not been heard and only the other party was heard and the impugned order was passed detrimental to the present petitioner. Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes 2 3. In these circumstances, the matter is again sent to respondent No.1, who shall consider the case of both the petitioner as also respondent No.5 and shall pass appropriate orders within one week from today. Respondent No.1 shall given an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as also to respondent No.5 and the representation of the petitioner shall be disposed of within 15 days from the date of presentation of a copy of this judgment. Copy Dasti. January 7, 2011 ( V.K. Ahuja ),J. (SDS) 3