IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 23RD NOVEMBER 2009 / 2ND AGRAHAYANA 1931 RP.No. 816 of 2009(U) --------------------- {IN WPC.6477/2006 OF THIS COURT} .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENT -------------------------------- THE SECRETARY, KADAMAKKUDY GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KADAMAKKUDY, PIZHALA.P.O., ERNAKULAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.K.M.VARGHESE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- SHIBU MANUEL, THYPARAMBIL HOUSE, UDYOGAMANDAL, ELOOR VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DIST. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ----------------------------- R.P.No.816 of 2009 in W.P.(C)No.6477 of 2006 ----------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of November, 2009 O R D E R The respondent-Secretary to the Kadamakkudy Grama Panchayat is the review petitioner. The writ petition was disposed of directing the panchayat to dispose of Ext.P2 representation, which pertains to the settlement of the claims in respect of the auction conducted by the writ petitioner. 2. It is seen from Annexure I that the suit is decreed against the writ petitioner. Therefore, in the light of Annexure-I, Ext.P2 cannot be considered. 3. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that Annexure-I is an ex parte decree and he has taken steps to get the same set aside. R.P.No.816 of 2009 in W.P.(C)No.6477 of 2006 :: 2 :: 4. Be that as it may, in view of the error apparent on the face of the record, as can be seen from Annexure-I, the review petition is allowed and the judgment dated 29.8.2008 in the writ petition is recalled. Sd/- (KURIAN JOSEPH) JUDGE SK/- //true copy// P.S. to Judge.