IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2011 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 29381 of 2011(W) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- R.GOPINATHANASARI,AGED 65 YEARS, S/O.RAMANASARI,RAREERAM,KANIKKAKUTTY JUNCTION, PAZHUMOODU,POOVACHAL.P.O,PIN-695575. BY ADV. SRI. M.SAJJAD RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE(CRIMES), CRIME BRANCH HEAD QUARTERS,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001. 3. DETECTIVE INSPECTOR,CB CID,HHW1 (HO) CRIME BRANCH JAWAHAR NAGAR,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001. 4. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION REPRESENTED BY SUPDT OF POLICE SPE/CBI/KOCHI, PIN-682016. SPECIAL POLICE ESTABLISHMENT / CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION R1 & R2 BY STATE ATTORNEY SRI. P. VIJAYARAGHAVAN PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. NOUSHAD THOTTATHIL R3 & R4 BY ADV. SRI. P. CHANDRASEKHARA PILLAI, SC FOR CBI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: SD WPC NO. 29381/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P1: A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE KARAMANA POLICE STATION. EXT.P2: A TRUE COPY OF THE FIR NO.152/2009 IN KARAMANA POLICE STATION. EXT.P3: A TRUE COPY OF THE POSTMORTEM REPORT 14/4/2009. EXT.P4: A TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 17/3/2010 OF THE 14TH MEETING OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY. EXT.P5: A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 21/7/2010 ORDERING THE INVESTIGATION BY THE CRIME BRANCH. EXT.P6: A TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT CB-CID-DETECTIVE INSPECTOR BEFORE THE JFCM-I, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE SD N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J. -------------------------------- W.P.(C). No.29381 of 2011 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of December 2011 J U D G M E N T Learned State Attorney submits that the investigation is proceeding in the right direction and that the 3rd respondent is trying to apprehend the culprits. Hence, it is submitted that some more time may be granted. If the accused are not apprehended and the investigation is not completed within three months from this date, the petitioner can move this Court again. With this observation, this writ petition is closed. N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Jvt