IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 10185 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 7.9.2011 Sukhwinder Singh @ Micky Chhabra .. Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K. S. Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Narinder Singh, Advocate for the complainant. Rajesh Bindal J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the present FIR is a result of non-clearance of a cheque allegedly issued by the petitioner to the complainant, for which he had already initiated proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Still the matter in dispute in the present case has been settled. The aforesaid fact is not disputed by learned counsel for the complainant. Considering the aforesaid facts, in my opinion, the petitioner is not required to be taken into custody for interrogation. He will appear before Investigating Officer on 15.9.2011 at 10.00 AM. In case of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer. He shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called upon for further investigation. He shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 7.9.2011/mk