1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4449 OF 2009 (The Buldana District Central Coop. Bank Ltd. & Anr. vs. The Hon'ble State Minister for Cooperation & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. JANUARY 28, 2010. Heard Shri Patil, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mrs. Khade, learned AGP for respondent No. 1 and Shri Lahoti, learned counsel for respondent No.2. Nobody appears for respondent No.3, however, their reply affidavit is on record. In view of the statement therein, Shri Patil, learned counsel has opposed the request of the learned AGP for further grant of time. Shri Patil, learned counsel states that such reply by AGP is totally unnecessary. Shri Lahoti, learned counsel has stated that the arrangement between respondents No. 2 & 3 has come to an end and Respondent No. 2 is not interested in the matter at all. The reply filed by Respondent No.3 before this Court on affidavit shows that according to Respondent No.3, the arrangement between Respondents No. 2 & 3 still subsists. Respondent No.3 has stated that the revision before State Government was filed by Respondent No.2 without taking them into 2 confidence. They have also stated that they are not concerned in any way with said revision. I, therefore, find substance in the arguments of Shri Patil, learned counsel that Respondent No.3 is not opposing the prayers made in the petition. In view of this position, the impugned order dated 01.06.2009 is quashed and set aside. The revision filed by Respondent No. 2 on behalf of Respondent No. 3 before Respondent No.1 is also rejected. The petitioners are free to proceed further in the matter in accordance with law. Writ Petition is disposed of. Rule accordingly. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.