HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.22152 and 22156 of 2011 Date:05.08.2011 W.P.No.22152 of 2011 Between: N.Raja Rao and another ..... Petitioners AND Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation reptd by its Commissioner .....Respondent Counsel for the Petitioners : Sri M.Radha Krishna Counsel for Respondent : Sri N.Ranga Reddy, Standing Counsel for GVMC AND W.P.No.22156 of 2011 Between: Uppili Kanaka Mahalakshmi ..... Petitioner AND Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation reptd by its Commissioner .....Respondent Counsel for the Petitioners : Sri M.Radha Krishna Counsel for Respondent : Sri N.Ranga Reddy, Standing Counsel for GVMC The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: These two writ petitions are filed for a Mandamus to direct the respondent not to interfere with the petitioners’ peaceful possession and enjoyment of the premises in their respective occupation without notice or opportunity to the petitioners to explain their case. At the hearing, Sri N.Ranga Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, appearing for the respondent, submitted that the respondent-Corporation will not take away the petitioners’ property either without their consent as envisaged under Sections 146 and 147 of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955, or in the absence of such consent without initiating the proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. This submission of the learned Standing Counsel is placed on record and the writ petitions are accordingly disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petitions, W.P.M.P.Nos.27008 and 27012 of 2011 filed by the petitioners for interim relief are disposed of as infructuous. __________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 05th August, 2011 DR