C! C! setitioner) !^1 1^1 lohd. Firoj Xhan, S/o Late Shri l.S. Khan, Aged about 45 years, Gurukul Vidyaiaya, Pendra Road, Residing at : Near Head Post Office, Rajendra Nagar, Bilaspur 3. 5. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary', Department of Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribs DevelQpment, D.K.S. ihawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C-.G.) The Under Secretary, Department of Tribal Development, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) The Director, Department of Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribe Development, Raipur (C.G) The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Bliaspur (C.G.) The u! Vidvala' District Bilaspur (C.G.) ihri B.P. Rao, learned counsel ror the appellant. Shri U.N.D. Deo, learnea' Govt. Advocate forthe State/respQndents. '^ 1 I;; I,. tt."aa^BBWflS.^l.iS.^«...iSfiiiB3,J ^. :th The foliowing judgment of She Court was passed by ijeev Gypta, C.J. Learned counsel for the parties are heard on admission. 2) Appeilant - Mohd. Firoj Khan has'filed this writ appegl 02-04-2008, Dassed in WP(S)No. 1062/2008. 3) The appelianVpetitioner filed the writ petition for the foliowing reliefs: "7.1 that, the respondents may kindly be directed to submit the entire records as regards the petltioner's case. 7.2. this Hon'bie Court may further be pleased to pass any order or issue any suitabte writ as this Hon'bie Court may deem fit under the circumstances of the case inciuding the cost of the petition. 7.3 . that the impugned order of transfer (Ann.P/2,P/'4 & P/-S) may kindly be quas.hed ma' cail for interference as not in the interest of public and transfer poiicy, 2007. Thi respondents may klndly be directed to withdraw the impugned transfer order as mala fide." r 4. The appeiiant / petitioner, thus chs.llenging his transfer from Pendra Road to Narayanpur. 5. On due consideration of the submissions of iearned counsel -for the partles; the pieadings of the parties; and the reasonings given by the iearned Single Judge in the impugned order, we do not find any infirmity either in the order of the appeliant's transfer dated S-07-2007 or the impuaned order lilj:!!IJ: ^ :l l !!il -^(-t susbu passed by the learned Singh Judge dismlssing the appeliant's •writ petltion. We, thererore, do not find any scope for interference in the matter of appellant's transfer. 7. The writ appeal, therefore, is liabie to be dismissed and is herebv dismissed summariiv. Sd/- Chief Justice Judge I'iil" B-