1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 12. FA/463/2009 (The State of Maharashtra and another vs. Vasant Maruti Pimple through LRs.) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mrs. R.R.Mane, AGP for the applicant. Mr. S.B.Patil, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 to 4. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 13/7/2009 P.C.:- 1. Heard both the Counsel extensively. The matter is decided at admission stage. The record is available. 2. The land of the claimant admeasuring 4 acres 20 gunthas was acquired. The total valuation effected by the Special Land Acquisition Officer was Rs.55,114/- at the rate of Rs.12,000/- per acre, as against the claim of Rs.1,35,000/-. From Rs.89,500/- the learned Judge has deducted the received amount of Rs.55,114/- and the enhancement is Rs.34,386/-, at the rate of Rs.20,000/- per acre. The learned Judge has taken into account the sale deed at Exh.34 dt.1.12.1984, of the land survey No.90/2, which has the calculation of Rs. 2 1300/- for 2 R. of the land, the learned Judge has observed that it was, thus, at the rate of Rs. 26,000/- per acre. The subsequent sale deed was dt.25.1.1990 ( Exh.38) while the notification under Section 4 was dt.27.4.1989. 3. The calculation carried by the learned Judge, fixing the enhancement at the rate of Rs. 20,000/- per acre, basing the claim to Exh.34 and also looking to the aspect of subsequent sale deed dt.25.1.1990, does not call for interference. First Appeal dismissed. No costs. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/fa463-09