mGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPLTR Writ Petition No. 443 of2005 Petitioner Bhagwat Ram Drov S/o Anirit Rani Dmv, aged 37 years, Watcnnan in Govt. Pre-matric Anusuchit Jati Boys, Hostel, Navagarii, Distt. Durg. R/o. village Litipur, P.0. Pratappur, Distt. Durg [C.G.] yersus \. 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretaiy, Scheduie Tribes, Scheduled Castes aad other backward class welfare, Department, Raipur [C.G.] 2. Collector, Durg, District Durg [C.G] Writ petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitation oflndia Single Bench: Hon bie Mr. Justiee Satish K. Aanihotri. pl J i^sent: Smt. Meena Shashtri, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt. Advoeate fbrthe State/respondents. ORAL ORDER 3F ffassed on 9urDay ofMay, 2007) 1. The case ofthe petitioner is that he was appointed as peon CClass IV Emolovee) in Pre Matric Adivasi Boys Hostel, Navagarh, District Durg, on 12.08.1992, under 'Anusuchit Jati/Janjati Vishesh Bhartiya Abhiyan' by the concerned Collector as per merit list prepared by the selection committee. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that the respondents have not reeularized his service till date. The petitioaeT has filed a representation to the Collector Dure in this regard aad that has not been decided. The petitioner made several requests for regularization ofhis services in oral and written form, but the authoritv is not 4f ready to take any positive action. He had filed a representation to the Collector, Durg, on 15.09.2004 2. In this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the relief soudit for bv the petitioner is as under: "This Hon'ble Court kindlv be pleased to^irect the respondents to pav the petitioner reeular pav-scale with arrears ofpav since 1992 or after 1992 making regularization." 3. In mv opinion fhe responsible respondents ought to have considered the h/ A JL 2. 4h/ .erievance of the petitioner made ia his representation. Since that has not been done, a direction requires to be issued to the respondents. Accordingly, the following: ORDER (i) The writ petition is disposed of. di} A direction is issued to the competent authority before whom fhe representation said to have been filed by the petitioaer is pending, to consider the same aad pass aa appropriate order in accordance w'fh law, within six monfhs from the date ofreceipt ofa copy of this order. Ordered accordinelv. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge