IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT APPEAL NO : 132 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 28/12/2006 in WP NO : 17811 OF 2006 on the file of the High Court.) Between: A.V.Satyanarayana S/o.A.V.Rangaiah City Top, Bowinpally, Secunderabad ..... APPELLANT AND 1 The State of AP., rep.by its Secretary, R&B Department Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The Superintendent Engineer, R&B Department Mahaboobnagar circle, Mahaboobnagar, 3 The Executive Engineer, R&B Department, Wanaparthy Division, Wanaparthy, Mahaboobnagar District .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant:MR.KASAJAGANMOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR ROADS & BUILDINGS The Court made the following : JUDGMENT: (Per Anil R. Dave, CJ) Heard the learned Advocate. We are in agreement with the conclusion of the learned single Judge that disputed questions of fact are involved in the petition. In the circumstances, the learned Advocate seeks permission to withdraw the petition so as to approach the appropriate Forum. The observations and the findings arrived at by the learned single Judge would not come in the way of the appellant if the appellant approaches the appropriate Forum. The appeal shall stand dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J 18th February, 2008 GRR 1. 2.2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WA {RLD}