: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.416 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.416 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.416 OF 2004 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.8610 OF 2003 WRIT PETITION NO.8610 OF 2003 WRIT PETITION NO.8610 OF 2003 Mrs.Jayashri Madhav Kulkarni ).. Petitioner Versus The Director/District Social Welfare ) Officer, Pune and others ).. Respondents Mr.G.R. Rege with Ms.Shakuntala Mudbidri for the Petitioner. Mr.Sandeep Marne for Respondent No.2. Mr.S.V.Pitre for Respondent No.5 CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 14TH OCTOBER 2005 DATED: 14TH OCTOBER 2005 DATED: 14TH OCTOBER 2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . This Contempt Petition alleges contempt of the order dated 9th June 2004. By this order, the Division Bench had directed Respondent No.1, who is Respondent No.1 in the present Contempt Petition, to decide the proposal sent by Respondent No.5, who is Respondent No.5 in this Petition, on 22nd December 1997 within a period of eight weeks from the date of the order. Parties were at liberty to take appropriate steps thereafter. 2. In pursuance of this order and in compliance thereof, Respondent No.1 has considered the proposal : 2 : submitted by Respondent No.5 on 22nd December 1997. An affidavit has been filed on 26th March 2005 of the District Social Welfare Officer, Respondent No.1. It is averred in that affidavit that the proposal has been considered and directions have been issued to Respondent No.5 to formulate a seniority list by fixing the seniority of Ashok Kulkarni as proposed in the proposal of 22nd December 1997. Since the order of the Division Bench has been complied with, there is no case made out in the Contempt Petition. Rejected.