IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 9TH MARCH 2010 / 18TH PHALGUNA 1931 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 657 of 2010() ----------------------------- CRA.146/2008 of ADDL. SESSIONS COURT- I, PALAKKAD ST.2621/2006 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-II, PALAKKAD .................... REVN. PETITIONER/1ST RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:- ------------------------------------------------------------- R.K.INVESTMENT GENERAL MUTHAIAH STREET, SOWCARPET,CHANNAI, REP.BY POWER OF ATTOERNEY HOLDER, V.P.KANNANUNNI, RECOVERY MANAGER, R.K.INVESTMENT NO.469,PUDUSSERY BUILDING, V.H.ROAD,PALAKKAD - 678001. BY ADV. MR. V.RAJENDRAN (PERUMBAVOOR) MR. GEORGE VARGHESE KIZHAKKAMBALAM RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS/STATE & ACCUSED:- ------------------------------------------------------- 1. HAMSA.K.P., AGED 38 YERAS, S/O. VEERAN. KARIKKUMPURATH HOUSE, MANALAYA-MANALI, THOOTHA VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. ADV. MR. P.A. SALIM, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR , J. -------------------------------------------------- Crl.R.P. No.657 of 2010 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of March, 2010. ORDER Since the impugned order is an order of acquittal passed by the lower appellate court, the remedy of the petitioner is to file an appeal. Hence, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to file an appeal, this revision is dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner may apply for return of the certified copy of the impugned orders. Dated this the 9th day of March, 2010. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. rv