IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11361 of 2009 Sachchida Nand Jha, S/O Uchit Narayan Jha, resident of Village-Parmanandpur, P.O.- Simaria, P.S. Kazrauli, District-Samastipur. ………………………..Petitioner. Versus 1. The Bihar State Electricity Board, vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, through its Secretary. 2. The Chairman, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 3. The Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board,Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 4. The Joint Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 5. The Director of Accounts, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 6. The Financial Controller-1, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 7. The Director (Terminal Benefits_, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road,Patna. 8. The Deputy Director of Accounts (Head Quarter),Bihar] State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road,Patna.; 9. The General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer, Electric Supply Area Board, Bhagalpur. 10. The Electrical Superintending Engineer, Electrical Circle, Bhagalpur. 11. The Electrical Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division,Banka. ……..Respondents. ----------- For the petitioner :- Mr. Shiw Kumar Jha, Advocate. For the B.S.E.B. :- Mrs. Namrata Mishra, Advocate. 2. 02. 09. 2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Respondent-Board. The grievance of the petitioner is that after enhanced of the salary of the petitioner as per Office Order No. 61, dated 11. 07. 2008 as contained in Annexure-1, pension has not consequently been revised as a result petitioner is suffering a lot. Besides above, Gratuity has not been sanctioned as also certain arrears on account of increment has not been paid to the petitioner. It is further submitted that 2 payment on account of Group Insurance and G.P.F. were paid after a long delay for which petitioner is entitled statutory interest over the delayed payment.. Learned counsel for the Board submits that in case petitioner files a representation stating details of his claim, the same shall be considered without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his pending claim, petitioner proposes to file a representation before Respondent No. 3. In case, such representation is filed along with relevant document in support of his claim as also certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks from today, Respondent No. 3 shall consider and dispose of the claim of the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the claim of the petitioner could be settled without delay. With the above observations/directions, this writ application stands disposed of. m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)