IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-15071 of 2009 Vinod Kumar Sharma .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Ranjit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. NDS Mann, Addl. AG, Punjab for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. Counsel for the petitioner prays for time to place on record some documents to show that the petitioner has never worked in the field and all the documents showing so are fake or fictitious one. Even if that aspect is established in this petition from the documents, it will not be appropriate to invoke the jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the FIR or the subsequent proceedings. This primarily would be a defence, which the petitioner has to raise before the Court if the prosecution is not able to establish that the petitioner had worked in the field. The trial Court would look into this aspect. Counsel for the petitioner prays for liberty to raise all these pleas and place the relevant documents before the trial Court. There of-course is no need for granting any liberty for this purpose. The petitioner is entitled to raise all the pleas that he may wish to raise. However, it is not appropriate to quash the FIR or the subsequent proceedings on this ground. Dismissed. October 19, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE