IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4198 of 2009 ARUN SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 1.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State as also the learned counsel for the informant. Petitioner is an accused in Dulhin Bazar P.S. Case No. 65 of 2008 in relation to several sections of the Indian Penal Code including section 302 and section 27 of the Arms Act. Petitioner is named in the FIR along with other accused persons. It is contended that there is no serious overt act committed by the petitioner causing the death of the deceased. There are other persons who supposed to have fired at the deceased causing death. Learned counsel for the informant however has produced postmortem report which shows that there are three fire arm injuries on the person of deceased and the allegation against the petitioner is that he has also fired at the deceased along with other accused. Involvement of the petitioner prima facie proves at this stage. Looking at the seriousness of the offence and allegation against the petitioner he does not deserve bail. The prayer for bail is rejected. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)