THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Civil Revision Petition No.1022 of 2008 ORDER: This civil revision petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order dated 22.08.2007 passed in I.A.No.1282 of 2007 in O.S.No.157 of 2006 on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Ranga Reddy District, whereunder the petition filed by the respondent herein, plaintiff in the suit, praying to send Ex.A1 document to the handwriting expert for comparison of the signature of the petitioner-defendant on the said document with his admitted signatures, was allowed. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent herein laid the suit O.S.No.157 of 2006 on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Ranga Reddy District, against the petitioner herein, for recovery of money, on the basis of Ex. A1 document, which is stated to have been executed by the defendant promising to pay the debt amount obtained from the plaintiff, along with interest @ 12% per annum, as and when demanded. Petitioner-defendant filed written statement denying the execution of A1. Thereupon, the respondent-plaintiff filed the present petition, seeking to send Ex.A1 document to handwriting expert for comparison of the signature of the defendant on the said document with his admitted signatures. Petitioner-defendant resisted the petition by filing counter and it was his case that the Court has ample power to decide the subject matter of the dispute basing on the material available on record, that there is no necessity to send the document to handwriting expert, that the petition was filed only to fill the lacuna on the part of the plaintiff and the opinion of the expert is only piece of evidence and not a conclusive proof. The Court below, after detailed consideration of the matter, allowed the petition. Aggrieved thereby, the present civil revision petition is preferred by the defendant. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order and other material available on record. A perusal of the impugned order indicates that the defendant, petitioner herein, denied the execution of A1 document, under which he is stated to have promised to repay the debt amount obtained from the plaintiff with interest at 12% per annum, as and when demanded. In such circumstances, sending Ex.A1 document for comparison of the signature of the defendant on Ex.A1 with his admitted signatures would help the Court to arrive at a right conclusion in the suit and the Court below, taking note of the same, exercised its discretion and allowed the present petition, by the order under revision, and I see no reason whatsoever to interfere therewith in exercise of the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. _________________ JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA 5th December, 2009 IBL