C482 No. 141 of 2010 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Shri Sandeep Kothari, Advocate, present for the petitioners. Shri Prabhakar Joshi, Brief Holder, present for State. Ms. Sangeeta Miyan, Advocate, present for respondent No. 2 (complainant). The complainant is also present in person in the court. By means of this petition, moved under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioners have sought quashing of the criminal case No. 2187 of 2009, State Vs. Mumtaz Ahmed and others, relating to offences punishable under Sections 323, 498A, 504, 506 I.P.C., and one punishable under Section ¾ Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kashipur. Learned counsel for the parties stated that the parties to the matrimony have entered into compromise. It is further submitted on behalf of the complainant and her husband, who is petitioner No. 1 that after reconciliation, they have started living together. In the circumstances, complainant (respondent No. 2) is not desirous to prosecute her husband and in-laws, and has no objection if the proceedings are quashed. In the court, she verified the fact of compromise. Also, she has filed an affidavit in support of this petition, moved on behalf of the petitioners. In the above circumstances, in view of the principle of law, laid down in B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another, 2003 (4) SCC Pg. 675, this Court is of the view that the petition deserves to be allowed to save the matrimony. Accordingly, the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., is allowed. Proceedings of criminal case No. 2187 of 2009, State Vs. Mumtaz Ahmed and others, relating to offences punishable under sections 323, 498A, 504, 506 I.P.C. and one punishable under Section ¾ Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kashipur (District Udham Singh Nagar), are hereby quashed. Dt. 22.02.2010 (P. C. P., J.) S