IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.332 of 2009 VIJAY PRASAD GUPTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4/ 14/09/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is the father of the allegedly victim boy. He seeks direction commanding the respondent authorities to proceed as per the provisions of the Cr.P.C. and conclude the same within a stipulated period for the purpose of investigation and to look into aspect of organ trafficking in course of investigation. It appears that he initially lodged a report on 16.8.2008 that his son had gone missing. The police duly publicized the photograph of his son in different newspapers and T.V. Channels etc. He did not have any police case instituted, but has made a general pleading that his son has become a victim of an organ trafficking. A counter affidavit has been filed by the Dy.S.P., Law and Order. It states that a station diary entry was made on 16.8.2008 after the complaint of the petitioner was received, but his son could not be traced out despite efforts made. In pursuance of a fresh application given by 2 the petitioner Kotwali P.S. Case No.302/2009 has been registered under Section-365 of I.P.C. on 7.8.2009. The fardbeyan of the petitioner shows that he gave this fresh complaint on 7.8.2009 itself. Now that the police has registered an F.I.R., the Court expects the police to conclude investigation expeditiously and submitted the investigation report before the competent court without unnecessary delay. The application is disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)