..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1057 OF 2008 Dilip Mavinakurve. ..Petitioner. Versus Hundalani Finance & Leasing Company Ltd., and Anr. ..Respondents. .... Ms.Merlyn Monteiro, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Mubin H. Solkar, Adv. for the respondent No.1. Mr.A.S.Shitole, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 20th October, 2008. DATED : 20th October, 2008. DATED : 20th October, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioner-orig.accused, the learned Advocate for respondent No.1-orig.complainant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The respondent filed complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The said proceedings are numbered as C.C.No.1057/SS/2006 (previous No.804/S/1996), which are pending before the learned Special Metropolitan Magistrate, Small Causes Court at Mumbai. The learned Advocate for the ..(2).. complainant states that the complainant is willing to settle the matter if Rs.15,000/- is given to the complainant. The learned Advocate for the petitioner states that the petitioner is willing to give Rs.15,000/- to the complainant by 20th November, 2008. She states that the said amount will be paid by demand draft latest by 20th November, 2008. Mr.Solkar states that in view of this statement the complainant does not wish to continue with the prosecution against the petitioner. 3. In view of the above facts, the proceedings in the above case as against the petitioner are quashed. It is made clear that if the amount of Rs.15,000/- is not paid to the complainant by 20th November, 2008, this order shall automatically stand vacated and the petition shall stand revived. 4. Criminal Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)