THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.17333 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner seeks a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents 1 and 2 in not taking any steps against the 3rd respondent vis-à-vis the construction being made by him in the premises bearing No.3-6-108/A at S.J.Lane, Himayatnagar, Hyderabad. She contends that though representations dated 03.07.2009 and 07.07.2009 were made in this regard, still the construction is going on. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development appearing for respondent No.1 and the learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2 The petitioner reeled under the impression that the 3rd respondent did not obtain any permission from the Municipal Corporation and he is proceeding with the construction. It is urged that the existing building was demolished and excavation to a very deep level was undertaken to construct the cellar. As a matter of fact, this Court directed stay of construction by the 3rd respondent, acting on the representation made by the petitioner. At a later stage, an inspection was caused in compliance with the directions issued by this Court and a detailed report is filed. It is stated that the 3rd respondent was accorded permission to construct stilt for parking and two upper floors on 27.09.2008 and subsequently, a revised plan for cellar and ground plus four upper floors was sanctioned on 07.09.2009 in accordance with the relevant provisions of law. It is also stated that the construction is at the initial stage and all the steps were taken to ensure that no deviation occurs. As of now, the 3rd respondent is entitled to construct a cellar and ground plus four upper floors. As long as the construction takes place in accordance with the sanctioned plan, the petitioner or for that matter, respondents 1 and 2 cannot have any genuine grievance. If any deviation takes place, it shall always be open to them to initiate proceedings in accordance with law. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondents 1 and 2 to ensure that the 3rd respondent undertakes construction strictly in accordance with the sanctioned plan. The interim order of stay granted by this Court on 17.09.2009 is dissolved. There shall be no order as to costs. _________ 25.11.2009 JSU THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.17333 of 2009 Date: 25.11.2009 Jsu