IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9334 of 2008 ANEK SINGH @ RAM ANEK SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 6-5-2008 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is an accused in a case under section 307 of the Penal code and section 27 of the Arms Act. The allegation in the F.I.R. is that there was some dispute between the petitioner and Sunil Singh over partition of property. It is alleged that this petitioner shot from his rifle causing injury to Saroj Singh. The injury report shows that there are two injuries by fire arms and one injury caused by hard blunt substance.However, the injuries are simple in nature. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had no reason to fire on Saroj Singh. It was on account of dispute between the two brothers that the occurrence took place in a spur of moment. Learned counsel submits that he has instruction that the petitioner is in custody since last five months. I accordingly direct that the petitionerAnek Singh alias Ram Anek Singh should be released on bail after he completes six months in custody in Saraiya PS Case No. 233/2006 on furnishing bail bond of rupees ten thousand with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, (West) Muzaffarpur. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)