8.wp.2540-09 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2540 OF 2009 Raosaheb Vittal Pisal. ..Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .... Mrs.Pranali Kakde, Advocate i/b. Mr.Subhash Hulyalkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.A.S. Gadkari, A.P.P., for the Respondent – State. .... CORAM : BILAL NAZKI, AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 15TH OCTOBER, 2009 P.C.:- 1. The petitioner moved an application for grant of parole which was rejected on the ground that the petitioner will create problems to the witnesses who appear in the matter. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was convicted in the year 2008 and for a period of six years during which the trial took place he was on bail and therefore such an apprehension was misplaced. It was mentioned that the 8.wp.2540-09 2 disease mentioned of his mother was not serious. We have seen the certificate of the Doctor which says that the mother of the petitioner needed removal of appendice as early as possible. In these circumstances, we allow the Petition and direct that the petitioner be released on parole subject to usual terms and conditions. 2. Criminal Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. (BILAL NAZKI,J) (A.R.JOSHI,J)