IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.537 of 2009 Maheshwar Das . Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors . ----------- 4/ 24/06/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. An objection is taken on behalf of the State that the application is barred on the principles of res judicata after dismissal of C.W.J.C. No.5149/09 as the judgment has attained finality. The fact that the petitioner may have accepted that judgement and yet filed a representation which has been disposed off by the respondents shall not vest in him a fresh cause of action so as to maintain a writ petition before this Court. The submission that this writ petition seeks to raise issues with regard to seniority which has not been raised in C.W.J.C. No.5149/09 is appropriately answered in the proposition that all questions of facts and law have to be taken by a litigant in one writ application and he cannot be permitted to vex the respondents time and again on the same issue claiming fresh grounds as an afterthought. The principles of constructive res judicata debars him from doing so. The petitioner 2 superannuated on 29.2.2008 and thereafter the grounds now sought to be urged were well available to him in C.W.J.C. No5149 of 2009. The writ application is dismissed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)