IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50359 of 2008 Prasant Kumar, Agent, son of Ramesh Jha, resident of Village- Rahua, P.S. Mushari, District-Muzaffarpur. …….Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Sunita Kumari @ Sami, daughter of Late Mani Rai, Resident of Mohalla- Laxmi Colony, P.S. Mithanpur, District-Muzaffarpur. ………………Opposite Parties. ----------- 6. 08. 02. 2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Mithanpur P.S. Case No. 143/08, registered under Sections 406, 409, 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that allegations are imaginary otherwise, account standing in the name of complainant’s mother was transferred in the names of both the sisters after her death and there is no other paper at all about receiving the amount of Rs. 30,000/- for payment of electric charges and depositing only Rs. 12,000/- and mis-appropriation of money withdrawn by both the sisters from their account. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner, namely, Prasant Kumar, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of one month from today, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri J. K. Sinha, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, 2 Muzaffarpur, in connection with Mithanpur P.S. Case No. 143/08, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. m.p. (Mandhata Singh, J.)