1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4339 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL ST. NO. 22881 OF 2008 Machindra Narayanrao Gharat ...Applicant VERSUS Dr. Laxman Kondiba Bhosale & ors. ...Respondents ..... Shri G.O.Wattamwar, advocate holding for Shri S.G.Rudrawar, advocate for the applicant Respondent nos. 1, 3, 6, 7, 8, 10 & 12 served absent Application dismissed against respondent nos. 2, 4, 5, 9 and 11. ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. DATED : 14 th JANUARY, 2010 PER COURT : 1 Heard learned counsel for the applicant. 2 This is an application preferred by the applicant for condonation of delay of 54 days caused in filing accompanying Second Appeal. 2 3 For the reasons stated in the present application, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily. It also appears that the said delay is not willful, deliberate and intentional, and hence, same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 4 In the result, present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ and delay of 54 days caused in filing accompanying Second Appeal stands condoned and accompanying Second Appeal be registered and numbered and present application stands disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) dbm/ca4339.09