IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 22ND AUGUST 2008 / 31ST SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 1624 of 2005(R) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ PAPSY, ROOPKALA, IRAVIPURAM, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.JOHN BRITTO SRI.C.A.RAJEEV RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, KOLLAM. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY, KOLLAM. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOLLAM. 4. CELIA JENSON, K.K.PAULTRY FARM, IRAVIPURAM, KOLLAM. BY SHRI.TEKCHAND, GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR R1,2, THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.1624/2005 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1 : COPY OF SALE NOTICE DATED 10/12/2004. P2 : COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 19/07/2004. P3 : COPY OF COMMUNICATION DATED 19/07/2004 OF ADDL. SALES TAX OFFICER TO 2ND RESPONDENT. //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE. jg C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C) No.1624 of 2005 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 22nd day of August, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner, who has executed security bond for granting sales tax registration to the 4th respondent, can be proceeded against for recovery of arrears sought to be recovered for the amount covered by the bond. In fact, this Court issued interim orders on several occasions directing the petitioner to furnish property details of the defaulter with the direction to recover the arrears by sale of such property. If recovery is not so far effected, then there will be direction to the 2nd respondent to proceed for recovery against petitioner for the amount covered under the Bond without any delay. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) jg