IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 5TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 16TH MAGHA 1929 RP.No. 110 of 2008(U) --------------------------------- (AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.11516 OF 2006 DTD.16/01/2008) REVIEW PETITIONER/3RD RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------------------------------- SMT. LEELA, VADAKKETHODIYIL VEEDU, KOONAYILCHERRY, PARAVUR VILLAGE, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.G.BHAGAVAT SINGH RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS & PETITIONER: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOLLAM REVENUE DIVISION, KOLLAM. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PARAVUR VILLAGE, KOLLAM. 3. V. SUMITRA, D/O. LATE BALAN, AGED 44 YEARS, REVATHY, KOONAYILCHERRY, PARAVUR VILLAGE, KOLLAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. I.V. PRAMOD R3 BY ADV. SRI.V.V.VENUGOPALAN NAIR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ========================= R.P. NO.110 OF 2008 ========================= Dated this the 5th day of February 2008 ORDER By judgment dated 16th January 2008, the writ petition was disposed of directing implementation of Ext.P3 order passed by the first respondent. In this review petition, the review petitioner, who was the third respondent in the writ petition, submits that aggrieved by Ext.P3 order, he had filed an appeal before the District Collector and the said appeal is pending consideration of the District Collector. When this submission was made, counsel for the writ petitioner sought time for taking instructions. Today, it is submitted that an appeal was in fact filed and that although the matter was heard by the District Collector, final orders have not been communicated. Answering this submission, the learned counsel for the review petitioner submits that in view of the pendency of the writ petition, the District Collector has adjourned the matter and once the review petition is closed, the matter will be taken up for consideration. 2. Having regard to the submission made by those sides, I r.p.(110/2008 2 dispose of this review petition modifying the judgment to the following effect. 1) The District Collector, Kollam, shall, on the production of a copy of this order, consider and pass orders on the appeal filed by the review petitioner against Ext.P3 order passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this order. 2) Implementation of Ext.P3 order shall be in terms of the order to be passed by the District Collector in the appeal filed by the Review Petitioner. 3) Review Petitioner shall produce a copy of this order before the District Collector for compliance. Review Petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE css/ r.p.(110/2008 3