IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 11TH OCTOBER 2010 / 19TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 30785 of 2010(W) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- SONIA K.FRANCIS, AGED 21 YEARS, D/O.K.J. FRANCIS, KADAMANTHRA HOUSE, ELOOR SOUTH, UDYOGAMANADAL PO, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.BABU KARUKAPADATH, SMT.M.A. VAHEEDA BABU, SRI.JAGAN ABRAHAM M.GEORGE, SRI.K.A. NOUSHAD, SRI.P.G. PRAMOD, SRI.RAHUL KANDAMPULLY. RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REP.BY ITS REGISTRAR, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS , KOTTAYAM, PIN-686 562. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS , KOTTAYAM, PIN-686 562. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENTRANCE EXAMINATIONS, OFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR ENTRANCE EXAMINATIONS , NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001. 4. MAR ATANASIUS COLEGE OF ENGINEERING, KOTHAMANGALAM, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL, PIN-686 691. R1 & R2 BY ADV. MR.T.A. SHAJI, SC, M.G. UNIVERSITY. R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.P.N. SANTHOSH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/10/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.30785 of 2010 (W) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 11th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner has completed B.C.A. degree course in May, 2010 from U.C.College of Campus Center, affiliated to the 1 st respondent University. According to the petitioner, she sought admission to MCA and the 3 rd respondent allotted the petitioner to the 4 th respondent College as per Ext.P3 selection memo. 2. It is stated that the petitioner had failed in one of the papers of the 2 nd year B.C.A.Examination and that she has appeared for the supplementary examination and its result is awaited. According to the petitioner, the last date for production of the certificate concerning the aforesaid paper is expiring soon, and therefore the University should be directed to expedite publication of the supplementary examination results, and till such time the 4 th respondent College should not cancel the allotment or admission. 3. Learned standing counsel for the University submits that the University has already distributed the answer papers for valuation and that they are expecting to declare the results by the WP(C) No.30785/2010 -2- 2nd week of December. In my view, since the University has already taken steps for getting the answer papers valued and declaring the results, a further direction in this behalf is unnecessary. 4. In so far as the grievance of the petitioner that the 3rd respondent is likely to cancel the allotment given to the petitioner is concerned, having regard to the fact that as on date, the supplementary examination result of the petitioner has not been declared by the University, and since the petitioner is an unqualified candidate, this Court will not be justified in issuing any direction as sought for. 5. However, it will be open to the petitioner to move the 3rd respondent, in which event, it is for the 3rd respondent to pass appropriate orders in the matter. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg