{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3932 OF 2009 Suklal Baliram Bari PETITIONER VERSUS The Union of India and others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.R.V.Gore, Advocate for the petitioner (Absent) Mr.Alok Sharma, Standing Counsel for respondent No.1 ....... [CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. and A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE : 17th July 2009 PER COURT: 1. Perused. 2. None for the petitioner, even at third call. The dismissal of the petition in default would not serve the ends of justice, as it invariably results in moving application for restoration which creates strain on the registry. Hence, we propose to decide it on its own merits. Having gone through the petition, we found that the petition, as framed, cannot be entertained. The petitioner has also not disclosed under which notification, the symbol was allotted by the Election Commission. Even otherwise, the petition is frivolous. The same is, therefore, rejected in liminie with no order as to costs. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] [V.C.DAGA, J.] drp/wp3932-09