IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 4099 of 2009 Between: 1 Mr.Shaik Fazal, S/o. S.Abdul gaffar, R/o. D.No.7-280, Ravindranagar, Kadapa Town, Kadapa District. 2 Mr.S.Abdul Gaffar, S/o. late Fakrudhin Saheb, R/o. D.No.7-280, Ravindranagar, Kadapa Town, Kadapa District. 3 Smt. Farida Begum, W/o. Mr.S.Abdul gaffar, R/o. D.No.7-280, Ravindranagar, Kadapa Town, Kadapa District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Station House Officer, Pulivendula, kadapa District. 2 The Circle Inspector, Pulivendula, Kadapa District. 3 The Circle Inspector, Kadapa West zone, Kadapa. 4 The Superintendent of Police, Kadapa District at Kadapa. 5 Mr. Raja Saheb, Proprietor Kamadenu Dressess, pulivendula, Kadapa District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate order or direction especially one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 3 in harassing the petitioners and interfering with the marital dispute between the petitioner and the daughter of the 5th respondent and further giving threats to the petitioners and their family members and declare the inaction of the 4th respondent in initiating action on the representation made by the petitioner dated 10.2.2009 is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to harass the petitioners. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.MASTHAN NAIDU CHERUKURI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.4099 of 2009 Order: The main grievance of the petitioners in this writ petition is that respondents 1 to 3, at the instance of the fifth respondent, are harassing and interfering with the marital dispute between them and the daughter of the fifth respondent. A counter affidavit is filed by the official respondents denying the allegations made by the petitioners. At para-6 of the counter affidavit, it is categorically stated that as of now, no case is registered against the petitioners and that they are neither harassing the petitioners nor interfering with the marital dispute between them and the fifth respondent. In view of the specific stand taken by the respondents in their counter affidavit, no further adjudication is necessary in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. However, in case the respondents act in deviation to the submissions made hereinabove, the petitioners are at liberty to pursue the remedies available to them under law. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 31.03.2009 VGB