IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 16TH BHADRA 1933 Tr.P(C).No. 202 of 2011() ------------------------- OP.1810/2010 of FAMILY COURT,THRISSUR .................... PETITIONER: ------------------- BUBBY GEORGE, AGED 33 YEARS, D/O.GEORDI JOHN, HAVING PERMANENT RESIDINCE AT VARIKKASSERI HOUSE, BHARATHI VIHARAM, KURUSSUMOODU CHANGANASSERY, KOTTAYAM, PRESENTY RESIDING AT VRINDAVAN, T.C.76/2221-1,MGRA-F18, ANAYARA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.G.P.SHINOD SRI.MANU V. RESPONDENT(S): --------------- SIBI THOMAS, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O.T.D.THOMAS, ARAKKAL HOUSE, KARUVANOOR P.O., MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.P.SANTHOSH (PODUVAL) FOR R1 THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: TPC.No. 202 of 2011 - 2 - APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS : ANNEXURE A: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER AS O.P.NO.1810 OF 2010 BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT THRISSUR. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE. sou. K. HEMA, J -------------------------- Tr.P.C.No. 202 OF 2011 ----------------------------------- Dated 7th September, 2011 O R D E R This petition is filed to transfer O.P.no.1810 of 2010 pending before the Family Court, Thrissur to Family Court Thiruvananthapuram. 2. Petitioner and respondent are wife and husband respectively. Respondent filed annexure-A petition before the Family Court Thrissur seeking dissolution of marriage. Petitioner is now residing at Thiruvananthapuram as she is employed there. Petitioner has given various reasons why she finds it difficult to go to Court in Thrissur. 3. Respondent is working in Singapore. Learned counsel for respondent submitted that he has no objection in granting exemption to petitioner from appearance on every posting, but if the case is transferred to Family Court Thiruvananthapuram respondent will find it difficult to go all the way from Thrissur to Thiruvananthapuram. TPC.No.202/11 2 4. On hearing both sides, I am not satisfied of the submissions made to resist this petition. For a person who is working in Singapore, Thrissur or Thiruvananthapuram may not make any difference. But if the petition is retained at Thrissur itself, it will cause difficulties to petitioner. Considering the various aspects, I am satisfied that prayer can be allowed. Hence the following order is passed: 1. O.P.no.1810 of 2010 pending before the Family Court Thrissur is transferred to Family Court Thiruvananthapuram. 2. Family Court Thissur will forward the records to Family Court Thiruvananthapuram forthwith. This petition is allowed. Sd/- K. HEMA, JUDGE. Sou. // True copy // P.A. to Judge