IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH MAY 2010 / 5TH JYAISHTA 1932 WP(C).No. 29249 of 2009(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.CHINNAMMU AMMA D/O. LAKSHMMI AMMA AGED & 5 YEARS KOLKKATTU HOUSE LAKKIDI POST, OTTAPALAM PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER HR & C, MALABAR DEVASOM BOARD PALAKKAD. 2. THE MANAGING TRUSTEE, KKILLIYKKURUSSI MANGALAM MAHADEVA TEMPLE LAKKIDI OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD. 3. THE COMMISSIONER MALABAR DEVASOM BOARD. ADDL.R4 4. KALYANIKUTTY, W/O PRABHAKARAN, CHENANCHATH HOUSE, MANGALAM POST, LIKKIDI, OTTAPPALAM, PALAKKAD (Impleaded as per order dated 3.11.09 in I.A.13475/09) ADV. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN,SC,MALABAR DEVASWOM FOR R1,3 GP SRI.NANDAKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/05/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 29249 of 2009 APPENDIX EXHIBITS EXT.P1- A TRUE COPY OF THE PAY ROLL SHOWING PETITIONERS NAME IN THE PAY ROLL DATED 1.3.09 EXT.P2- A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 18.2.06 EXT.P3- A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 10.7.09 EXT.P4- A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE LOCAL PEOPLE BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED NIL EXT.P5- A TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 19.8.09 (TRUE COPY) P.A TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J ------------------- W.P.(C).29249/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 26th day of May, 2010 JUDGMENT Petitioner claims reinstatement as “Adichu thali” under the 2nd respondent. She has filed Exts.P2 and P3 representations in this behalf which are stated to be pending before the 1st respondent. In this writ petition what is sought for is a direction for its consideration. Having regard to the limited nature of the relief that is sought for, without expressing anything on the merits of the contentions raised, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P2 and P3 with notice to the petitioner and the additional 4th respondent. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with the copy of the writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs