THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6656 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioners claim to have purchased various extents of land in Survey No.5/3 of Raidurg Panmaqtha Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District in the recent past from one K.Ashok Rao. Their grievance is that the respondents are trying to dispossess them from the land by stating that it belongs to the Government. It is also stated that the petitioners filed applications under G.O.Ms.No.166, dated 16.02.2008, seeking regularization of their land. Placing reliance upon an order passed by a Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.20541 of 2007, dated 28.09.2007, the petitioners seek necessary directions as regards regularization of their possession and for arrangements in the meanwhile. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue. The grievance of the petitioners is two fold, namely, processing of their applications filed in terms of G.O.Ms.No.166, dated 16.02.2008, and protection of their possession in the meanwhile. So far as the first relief is concerned, it is a matter of record that L.G.C.No.13 of 2004 is pending before the Special Court under the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act. G.O.Ms.No.166, dated 16.02.2008, itself contains a clause to the effect that the benefit thereunder cannot be granted, if any proceedings are pending before any Court in relation to the land. Therefore, the petitioners have to await the outcome of L.G.C.No.13 of 2004. As regards other limb of the relief claimed by the petitioners, it is, no doubt, true that a Division Bench of this Court directed that the possession of the vendor of the petitioners shall not be interfered pending disposal of L.G.C. Since the petitioners are claiming their rights from the petitioner in W.P.No.20541 of 2007, they can seek enforcement of the same by instituting necessary proceedings. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioners to seek appropriate remedies in accordance with law, be it as regards the processing of their applications under G.O.Ms.No.166, dated 16.02.2008, or the protection of their alleged possession. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:02.04.2009 kdl