IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 2ND APRIL 2007 / 12TH CHAITHRA 1929 WA.No. 868 of 2007() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.8836/2005 Dated 09/11/2006 .................... APPELLANT: PETITIONER: --------------------------------------- KARTHIYANI, W/O. LATE SREEDHARAN, H/NO.24/290, TRIPUNITHURA MUNICIPALITY. BY ADV. SRI.R.DIVAKARAN RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS -------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, KANAYANNUR TALUK OFFICE, ERNAKULAM. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, NADAMA VILLAGE, TRIPUNITHURA. BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. K.MEERA THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/04/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, AG.C.J. & M.N. KRISHNAN,J. = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.A. NO. 868 OF 2007 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 2nd day of April, 2007. J U D G M E N T Radhakrishnan, Ag.C.J. This appeal is preferred against the judgment of this Court in W.P.C.8836/05. We perused the report submitted by the 4th respondent which would disclose that an enquiry was conducted by the authorities and it would reveal that the petitioner is not the legally wedded wife of Sreedharan. So, the learned Single Judge found that the appellant/petitioner is not entitled to claim the assignment of property. We do not find any infirmity in the order of the learned Single Judge. The appeal, therefore, lacks merit and the same is dismissed. If the petitioner is so aggrieved may move the civil Court. Sd/- K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE. Sd/- M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/- // True copy // P.A. to Judge.