1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. WRIT PETITION NO. 3346 OF 2004 Salim Khan ... Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents Mr. Pankaj Kansara for Petitioner. Mr. K.R. Belosey, A.G.P. for Respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO,J. DATED : DECEMBER 23, 2004 P.C. . Rule. Heard forthwith. . The offences in respect of which the licences are rejected are between the year 1999-2000. No case has been pointed out after that period. The Parking space is not a ground as held by this court. The question whether in the residential locality by itself can result in denying licence has to be examined in the city of Mumbai. Considering that, to my mind, ends of justice will be met if the impugned orders dated 31.5.2002 and 15..6.2004 passed by Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Respondent No. 3 for reconsideration. In the light of that, rule made absolute. The impugned orders are quashed and set aside. The matters are remanded to the Respondent No. 4 for consideration afresh. All parties to act on copy of this order 2 authenticated by the Associate. s (F.I. REBELLO,J.)