}4 [N COURT OF AT MCC N0. 6 'o / 20 •w Applicant/ 'Smt. Urmila Bai, aged about 75 years l.-f..--') ^V^ ,-rio'.-'""n\C'.^ W/o Late Bhaiya Lai Bramhbhatta, R, ^^ ^fV \\f.. ''>"••'",..•'^•'1>'<\<P'"^ S'-'-:\,<).'"' '4>A'- •• ' 78- F' Risali sector, Bihilai, Distric Durg.(C.G.) RespoRdents State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary General Administrative De; ^. The Collector, Durg. District Durg. Arising out oforder dated 04/10/10, fiassed bi{ Sifigle \^" ofthis Hon'ble Court in WP NQ. 2084/2003 •^a ^, HIGH COURT OF CHHAITISGARH AT BILASPUR APPUCANT RESPONDENTS M.C.C. No. 610 of2010 Smt. Unnila Bai VERSUS State ofCMiattisgarh & Anolher APPLICATION FOR RESTORA'I'ION Present: Snri Parag Kotecha, Advocate for the applicant. Sl'a'i Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawver for the State. {Pn'.^^ n" 11 flfiv nf 'Mnvs^ihp:r 9.010'^ 5 J. <*l?l3^'t-«. V-'AA J. 1- ^tt.^f Ul -'i U i't/JtlJ.L/wi.., AfV J. ^ ^ 1. Leamed counsel appeai'ing for the applicant subinits that the counse! for tlie appiicauts could not appear on account ofbonaflde mistake, theriifore, Writ Petition No. 1084/2003, whieh was dismissed on 04.10.2010 mav be restored to its file. 2. ^ Reasonable and sufficient cause has been shown. Writ Petition No. 1084/2003 is restored to the original file. 3. A copy of this order be placed on record of the original writ ititioa ajid the same be listed fbr hearing. Sd/- SatishK-Agnibotn Judge