IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1912 of 2011 Ram Krishna Prasad Singh, S/o late Ram Bharosa Prasad Singh, Retd. Health Worker, Samho Primary Health Centre and Farmer Social Worker, resident of Village- Samho, P.S. Samho, District- Begusarai. ……Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar represented through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Rural Development, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Commissioner, Munger Division, Munger. 4. The District Magistrate, Begusarai. 5. The Deputy Development Commissioner –cum- Chief Executive Officer, District Board, Begusarai. 6. The Project Director, D.R.D.A., Begusarai. 7. The District Programme Officer, Begusarai. 8. The Executive Engineer, District Board, Begusarai. 9. The Circle Officer, Samho Block, District- Begusarai. 10. The Block Development Officer, Samho Block, District- Begusarai. 11. Sri Nawal Singh, Junior Engineer, District Board, Begusarai. 12. Officer In-Charge, P.S. Samho, District- Begusarai. 13. Surendra Singh @ Seth, S/o late Damodar Singh, Village- Samho, P.S. Samho, District- Begusarai. ……Respondents. ----------- 04- 14.9.2011 None appears for the petitioner when the matter is called out. Mr. Harish Kumar, learned Assistant Counsel to Additional Advocate General No.X for respondents no.1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, 10 and 12, and Mr. Nikesh Kumar for respondents no.5, 6, 8 and 11, are present. 2. This writ petition by way of public interest litigation has been filed for a direction to the respondents to 2 immediately stop the ongoing earth work for preparation of the road being built under Salha Saidpur Barari-2 Panchayat under Samho Akha Kurha Block in the district of Begusarai. The contention, as apparent from the pleading of the writ petition, is that crops and fields of the farmers are being destroyed due to earth excavation for making the said road. 3. Learned counsel for the State and the District Board submit that pursuant to the complaint submitted before the District Magistrate an enquiry was made and the allegations have been found to be unsubstantiated. Learned counsel for the State submits that he has a copy of the said report dated 11.1.2011 and if permitted he shall bring the same on record. This Court has no cause to disbelieve the existence of such a report or the findings therein, as submitted by learned counsel for the State. 4. In view of the aforesaid, in our considered opinion, we do not find that there is any public interest involved in the present writ petition. Accordingly the same stands dismissed. (S K Katriar, J.) (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) S.K.Pathak/