1 WP 2319.10.sxw JPP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2319 OF 2010 Rajeev Kumar. ... Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra through CBI, ACB, Mumbai. ... Respondent. Mr. M.G. Shukla i/b. Girish Kulkarni for the Petitioner. Mr. S.K. Shinde, for the Respondent. Mr. S.A. Shaikh, APP for the State. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 18th AUGUST 2011. P.C. :- Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner and C.B.I. 2. Exhibit 61 in Special Case No.52 of 2000 moved by the Accused/Applicant was rejected by order dated 18.5.2010. Without challenging the same before appropriate appellate forum, identical application was moved by the Accused/Applicant below Exhibit 62 before the learned Special Judge in Special Case No. 52 of 2000. The learned Special Judge has, by his elaborate order illustrated how the application is mischievously moved to drag the proceedings. 2 WP 2319.10.sxw 3. I find substance in the observations of the learned Judge. The reference in the Judgment in the matter of Rajendra Prasad V/s. Narcotic Cell through its officer in charge (AIR) 1999 S.C. 2292 is discussed by the learned Judge. Considering the conduct of the accused and the protraction of the trial, the rejection of Exhibit 62 on merits was within the parameter as were prescribed and there is no error on the part of the learned Judge. 4. The Writ Petition is rejected. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)