1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.S. No.788/2009 in First Appeal No.423/2002 ( Ghaffarkhan Miyakhan ..V/s.. Mohd. Sujat Mohd. Wajib through L.Rs. & others ) =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr. Mohd. Arif, counsel for the appellant. Mr. A.D. Choube, counsel for the respondents. C ORAM : F. M. REIS, J. DATED : 15th JANUARY, 2010. This is an application filed by the appellant to appoint the Administrator General or an Officer of the Court to represent the estate of the deceased respondent no.3. The respondents have filed their reply to the said application alleging that the respondent no.3 has left behind the legal representatives i.e. respondent nos.1 and 2. The said reply is also supported by an affidavit. On hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the dispute sought to be raised with regard to the representation of the estate of the deceased respondent no.3, I find that 2 in peculiar circumstances of the case no orders are required to be passed to appoint the Administrator General or Officer of the Court as prayed for by the appellant. However, the respondent nos.1 and 2 shall represent the estate of the respondent no.3 subject to the contentions raised by the appellants to the effect that the respondent no.1 and 2 do not inherit the estate of the respondent no.3. This dispute as to whether the respondent nos.1 and 2 are the legal representatives of deceased respondent no.3 shall be considered at the time of final hearing of the above appeal. In view of the above, Civil Application No.788/2009 stands disposed of. JUDGE. Tambaskar.