IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO : 18564 of 1999 Between: 1 V.Venkatesham S/o, Lingam Yeddumailaram, Medak District. 2 B. Murali Krishna S/o. B.Venkata Swamy. Yeddumailaram, Medak District. 3 P.Krupakar s/o. Venkatesham Yeddumailaram, Medak District. 4 B.Raj Reddy S/o. Venkat Reddy Yeddumailaram, Medak District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Union of India, Rep by its Secretary to Defence, Ministry of defence, South Block, New Delhi, 2 The Chairman & Director General of Ordance Factories 10-A, Auckland Board, Calcutta - 700001, 3 The General Manager Ordanance Factory, Yeddumailaram, Medak District. 4 Smt M.Padmavathi W/o Not Know Ordanance Factory, Yeddumailaram, Medak District. 5 Sri V.S. Sharma S/o.Not Know Ordanance Factory, Yeddumailaram, Medak District. 6 Smt M.Uma W/o. D.Jamuna Prasad Ordanance Factory, Yeddumailaram, Medak District. 7 Sri P.Muralidharan S/o. Not Know Ordanance Factory, Yeddumailaram, Medak District. 8 B.A.S.Rama Rao S/o. Not Know Ordanance Factory, Yeddumailaram, Medak District. 9 Smt S.P.Rohine W/o Not Know Ordanance Factory, Yeddumailaram, Medak District. 10 Smt Swarnalatha W/o. Not Know Ordanance Factory, Yeddumailaram, Medak District. 11 Smt C.Padmaja W/o. Not Know Ordanance Factory, Yeddumailaram, Medak District. 12 C.V.G.Naidu S/o. Not Know Ordanance Factory, Yeddumailaram, Medak District. 13 M.V. Rao S/o Not Know Ordanance Factory, Yeddumailaram, Medak District. 14 Jagannadha Rao S/o. Not Know Ordanance Factory, Yeddumailaram, Medak District. 15 Parasuram Rao S/o. Not Know Ordanance Factory, Yeddumailaram, Medak District. 16 D.P.Rao S/o. Not Know Ordanance Factory, Yeddumailaram, Medak District. 17 V.Veereshalingam S/o. Not Know Ordanance Factory, Yeddumailaram, Medak District. 18 A.Yathupathi Raju S/o. Not Know Ordanance Factory, Yeddumailaram, Medak District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Wirt, Order or direction more Particularly one in the nature of Writ Mandamus, declaring the action of the third Respondent in not complying with the instructions issued by the Government of India, un OM.No, 11012/8/91-Estt.(A) dt.19.5.1993 and Continuing the ineligible and unqualified person appointed against Chargman Grade-II (Non- Technical)Posts as arbitrary, void and illegal and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to terminate service of the persons appointed as Chargman Grade-II (NT) based on the duboius Diploma in Russian Langauage said to have been issued by the All India Institute of Russain Language New Delhi or alternatively separate the Chargman Gr.-II (NT) appointed for translation of Russian Language from holding the vacancies of Chargman Grade-II (NT) and direct the 3rd Respondent to fill up the existing vacancies of Chargman Gr-II (Non-Tech) by promoting the petitioners according to their seniority with all other consequential benefits and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.V.JAGAPATHI Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) The Court made the following : ORDER: (Per Sri Justice GHULAM MOHAMMED) When the matter was called on 22.1.2009 none appeared and there was also no representation. Hence the matter was directed to be posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, when the matter is called none appears and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J ______________________________ SANJAY KUMAR , J Dt. 17.2.2009 KA ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. 2 CD copies