IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1778 of 2005 BAIDYA NATH SINGH, SON OF LATE AMBIKA SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SIKTI KHANJ AHA TOLA PACHRUKHWA, P.S. MASHRAKH, P.O. SONAULI, DISTRICT SARAN. -------- PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER. Versus 1. CHHABI NATH SINGH, SON OF LATE AMBIKA SINGH 2. HARENDRA PRASAD SINGH, SON OF LATE DWARIKA SINGH 3. SATYENDRA PRASAD SINGH, SON OF LATE DWARIKA SINGH 4. PHULPATI KUER, WIFE OF LATE DWARIKA SINGH 5. KAMALAWATI DEVI, DAUGHTER OF LATE DWARIKA SINGH OPPOSITE PARTIES No. 1 TO 5 ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE SIKTI KHANJ AHA TOLA PACHRUKHAWA, P.O. SONAULI, P.S. MASHRAKH, DISTRICT SARAN. 6. DHANESHAR RAM, SON OF LATE BANSHI RAM, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SIRSA JALALPUR, P.O. SONAULI, P.S. MASHRAKH, DISTRICT SARAN. ----- DEFENDANTS/OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Nagendra Rai, Advocate. For the opposite party No. 1 : Mr. Vijay Kumar Srivastava, Advocate. For the opposite party No. 2 : Dr. Alok Kr. Sinha, Advocate. --------- 19. 9/7/2009 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Civil Revision application as by now it has become a well settled principle of law that ordinarily the transferee pendente lite is not needed to be impleaded as party as it takes a calculated risk in purchasing the litigated property at his/her own risk. Learned counsel for the opposite party raises no objection. Permission is granted. This Civil Revision application is dismissed as withdrawn. S. Ali (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)