IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. L.P.A. No.824 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 4.9.2009 Lalit Kumar. -----Appellant Vs. Union Territory Administration & others. -----Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Advocate for the appellant. ----- ORDER: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that copy of replication has been filed in the paper book by mistake. Accordingly, we have ignored the said document from consideration. 2. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant on merits. 3. This appeal has been preferred against order passed by learned Single Judge, vacating the interim order and admitting the petition for hearing. 4. The grievance of the appellant in the writ petition was against order dated 25.9.2008 passed by the Adviser to the LPA No.824 of 2009 Administrator, Union Territory, Chandigarh acting as Appellate Authority under the service rules. By the said order, decision to treat the appellant senior to other colleagues was set aside. As a result of the said order, the appellant apprehended reversion. Initially, while issuing notice, order of status quo was granted but later after hearing the other side, the said order was vacated. No order of reversion has so far been passed. The appellant, however, apprehends reversion. 5. Having regard to the fact that no order of reversion has so far been passed, we do not find any ground to interfere with the order vacating interim order. 6. The appeal is dismissed. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE September 04, 2009 ( DAYA CHAUDHARY ) ashwani JUDGE 2