1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 11135 of 2011-D Decided on: 21.12.2011 Pratap Singh, Driver retired from HRTC, Shimla, R/o Vill Saidhar, P.O. Dalash, Tehsil Anni, District Kullu, H.P. ....Petitioner Versus 1. Managing Director, HRTC, Shimla-3, HP. 2. Divisional Manager, HRTC, Shimla. 3. The Regional Manger, Tara Devi Region, HRTC, Shimla. ...Respondents Civil Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. M.S. Kanwar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed mainly with the following prayer: “a. That writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued, directing the respondents to encash the sanction and due and admissible compensatory 2 leaves to the petitioner and furthermore, the other benefits accruing to the petitioner be granted in the nature of arrear, pay fixation, pension and other retrial benefits.” 2. It is seen that the representations filed by the petitioner are still pending with the first respondent. There will be a direction to the first respondent to look into the matter and take appropriate action in accordance with law, within a period of two months on production of a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner. The benefits, if any, to which the petitioner is found eligible, shall be disbursed to him within another one month. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, as above, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. December 21, 2011 (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (sck/hl) Judge.