IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.27443 OF 2009 Between : Ranga Reddy District Wine Merchants Welfare Association, Rep.by its General Secretary G.Damodar Goud. .... Petitioner A N D 1. The Managing Director. 2. The Prohibition & Excise Superintendent-cum- Depot Manager. 3. B.H.Narendar Kumar …Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.27443 OF 2009 O R D E R: The writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the first respondent- A.P.Beverages Corporation Ltd., in issuing the impugned Memo No. APBCL/ADMN/RRII/8120, dated 09.12.2009, directing the second respondent to shift the I.M.F.L. Depot, Ranga Reddy-II at Miyapur to Kondamadugu Village, Bibinagar Mandal, Nalgonda District as illegal, unlawful arbitrary and against the law and consequently to direct the respondents to continue the I.M.F.L. Depot Ranga Reddy-II at Miyapur, Ranga Reddy District and pass such other suitable orders. 2. Learned counsel for the first respondent filed counter affidavit. It is stated in paragraph Nos.6 and 11 of the counter affidavit filed along with WVMP No.411 of 2010 that the Corporation received the offer from the owner of Bowrampet godown, near Miyapur, to lease his godown of 18,000 sft. space of temporary sheds on 23.12.2009. After considering his offer, the Corporation informed the godown owner vide their letter, dated 02.01.2010, intimating that the Corporation is willing to take his godown with 18000 sft space of temporary sheds immediately, until completion of the construction of new godowns by him, within 90 days. 3. It is also stated that the corporation has already decided to shift the present godown to Bowrampet, which is about 5 kms., from the present godown and accordingly the letter of intent, dated 10.11.2009 had been issued to the land lord of the godown at Bowrampet. 4. In the light of specific stand taken in paragraph Nos. 6 and 11 of the counter affidavit and also in the light of the rest of the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition and also averments made in the respective counter affidavits no further orders need be passed. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ P.S. NARAYANA, J. February 08, 2010. YVL