IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.53 of 2010 1. KRISHN KANT SHARMA S/O SRI AYODHYA SINGH R/O VILL.- PARARIA, P.S. NARDIGANJ, DISTT.- NAWADA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, DEPTT. OF HUMAN RESOURCES, GOVT. OF BIHAR, VIKASH BHAWAN, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, NAWADA 4. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, NAWADA 5. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, NAWADA 6. THE SECRETARY, MANAGING COMMITTEE, MADHYA VIDYALAYA, NANHU BIGHA, P.S. ATRI, DISTT.- GAYA ----------- 2 5.5.2010 Reg:- I.A. No.3988 of 2010 Interlocutory application has been filed by the petitioner for amending the place of working of respondent nos. 3 to 5, as mentioned in the cause title, in place of “Nawada” , it should be “Gaya”. The Interlocutory application is allowed. It should be read as Gaya, in place of Nawada. Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the State. Petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondents to make payment of salary, which is due since petitioner’s appointment. The writ application is very confusing. In one paragraph, it is stated that the petitioner has been appointed in the year 1968. In another paragraph, he was 2 appointed in the year 1990 and in Para 8, he has stated that approval to the appointment was made in the year 1982. In the affidavited portion, the petitioner’s age has been disclosed as 38 years. All this contradiction indicates that on the basis of false statement, this writ application has been filed. The application stands dismissed. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.kumar