[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1388 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1388 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1388 OF 2004 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.5080 OF 1991 WRIT PETITION NO.5080 OF 1991 WRIT PETITION NO.5080 OF 1991 Asgarally Fidaally Potia & Ors. .... Petitioners Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay .... Respondents And 1(a) Akhtarhusein s/o A.F. Potia and Ors. .... Proposed Petitioners AND AND AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1389 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1389 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1389 OF 2004 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.5080 OF 1991 WRIT PETITION NO.5080 OF 1991 WRIT PETITION NO.5080 OF 1991 Asgarally Fidaally Potia & Ors. .... Petitioners Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay .... Respondents And 5(a) Mrs. Hamida Yusuf Potia wd/o Y.F. Potia and Ors. .... Proposed Petitioners Shri S.M. Khaire for the Petitioners in both the Applications. Shri Patil for the Respondents in both the Applications. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: OCTOBER 05, 2004 P.C: P.C: P.C: Since common question of law and facts arise in [2] both the applications, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. Heard the learned Advocates for the parties. Considering the facts disclosed in the applications and there being no counter to those facts stated on oath, upon hearing the learned Advocates for the parties and on perusal of the records, it is apparent that the applicants/petitioners have made out sufficient cause for condonation of delay in filing the application for setting aside the abatement as well as to bring the L.Rs. of the original petitioner Nos.1 and 5 on record. Hence, the applications are allowed in terms of the prayer clauses (a), (b), (c) and (d). The amendment to be carried out within two weeks. Applications stand disposed of. ------