0 1: U o’v //_ g @ . ’7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT ' BILASPUR smwg Bangh WRIT PETITION (C) No. $3”? /2oos PETITIOINER 1) Munu ram 5/0. Shri Balak ram //,J\ Cuh‘ivdfor, Aged abou‘r 65 year's, /" ”(m R/o.ViHage - Jhikabahar‘ Post— Ligara, P.S. Tamnar Tahsil - Ghar‘ghoda Dis’rf. Raigarh (CLG) v$.'." 2)‘ Ganesh mm S/o.Shri Munumm 6‘5 “,3 Cultivafor', Ages abou‘l’ 4O yedrs, ood- R/o.Village ~ Jhikabahar PosT- i‘i ; \4g0’’ Lag g$ Ligara, P.S. Tamnar Tahsil - f qg/ Ghar‘ghoda Dish“. Raigar'h (CG) 3) Chhedi lal S/o. Shri munumm ‘ CulTiva’ror‘, Ages abouT 38 year's, ) R/o.Village - Jhikabahar‘ Pos‘r— Ligara, P.S. Tamnar Tahsil — x Ghar‘ghoda DisT‘r. Raigarh (CG) 4) Sankirar&n S/oShr'i Khadi Bhuniya Cul‘rivafor, Ages abou) 35 years, R/o.Village - Jhikabahar Pos’r- IL ‘ Ligara, P.S. Tamnar' Tahsil - Ghar‘ghoda Disf‘r. Raigar'h (CG) @ VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1) The STaTe of Chhah‘isgarh, Through; — Secretary, Deparfmem‘ of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2) Collec’ror' / Incharge Land Acquisi’rion Officer Raigarh, Raigarh (C.G.) 3) Land Acquish‘ion Officer/ S.D.O. Gharghoda Dis’r‘r. Raigarh (C.G.) 4) Jila Vyapar & Udyog Kendra Raigarh, Through i’rs Managing Direc‘ror Raigarh (6.6.) 5 ) M/s Jindal Power Lfd. Through i’rs Managing Director, , Tamnar Raigarh (C.G.) 6) Naib Tahsildar Tamnar, DisTricT—Raigarh(C.G.) 7) S‘raTion House Officer, Police Sfafion - Tamnar Dis’rricf - Raigarh (6.6.) WRIT PETITION IN THE NATURE OF UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT,DIRECTION AND/OR ORDER DETAILS OF PETITION ‘4! WW .wPL) 2L5? ug SB : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. 28-01-2011 Dr. Shailesh Ahuja, counsel f0‘ the petitioner. V Shri V. V‘ S. Murthy, Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondents No.1 to 4 & 6 to 7 Shri B. D. Guru, counsel for respondent No.5. Heard. Learned counsel for the parties jointiy submitted that the tand acquisition proceedings, which are subject matter of this petition, have aiready been quashed vide order dated 28-O7-2010 passed by this Court in W.P.(C)No.2116 of 2008 (Roap S h vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others). From the perusal of the reco ds, the proceedings of land acquisition drawn in the case of the petitioner nd after perusing the order passed by this Court in W.P.(C)No.21‘l6 of 20 B and the records of the said case, this “Court is satistied that the petition r in this petition and the petitioner in WP.(C)N0.2116 of 2008 are ch llenging the same land acquisition proceedings As the iand acquisition proc edings have already been quashed by this Court, no further order required to be passed. lt Is ordered that the land acquisition proceedings drawn agai st the petitioner, in respect of his land, stand quashed. ln view of foregoing, the i g above. No order as to costs. = I Manindra Mohan Shrwastavagj Judge [0% <ftr