THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No. 6680 OF 2005 O R D E R: Though this Writ Petition has been instituted for declaring the action of the respondents in not filling up the roaster point 4/18 with the writ petitioner as illegal, the learned Standing Counsel for the 1st respondent University has stated that the roaster point No. 18 in roaster cycle No.4 is meant to be filled in with BC ‘D’ group (woman candidate). Since at that relevant point of time, women candidates were not readily available, the said roaster point could not be filled up in 2004-05 recruitment process, but however, women candidates belonging to BC ‘D’ group became available subsequently and the said roaster point has also been filled up. It is also further stated by Sri K. Suresh Reddy, learned Standing Counsel that the writ petitioner has also been appointed as an Agricultural Extension Officer at S.V. Agricultural College, Tirupati on 02.03.2009 against a BC ‘D’ roaster point. Therefore, he submits that the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication. Since the statement has not been controverted and since the women candidates belonging to BC ‘D’ group are said to have been appointed and since the writ petitioner has already been appointed as an Agricultural Extension Officer on 02.03.2009, on regular basis, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. --------------------------------------- (NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J) 21st October 2010 ksld THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.17066 OF 2010 DATED: 20th July, 2010.