IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 238 of 2010 Mumtaz Ahmed …..Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …..Respondents. Present : Ms. Neetu Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.P. Joshi, Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent no. 1. Mr. B.D. Upadhyay, Advocate for respondent nos. 2 to 6. Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, CJ Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Barin Ghosh, C.J. (Oral) 1. The tribunal is not functioning today. In the circumstances, the petitioner has been compelled to approach this Court. The Tribunal passed an order to the effect as follows :- “The claim petition is allowed. The impugned orders passed by respondents (copy of which has been annexed as Annexure- A- 1 and Annexure-A-2) are hereby set aside. The petitioner be reinstated in the service. However, it will be open to the respondents to pass an order afresh after giving an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. The petitioner shall not be entitled to any pay and allowances of service for the period he remained out of service on the principle of ‘No work no pay’. No order as to costs.” 2. In the present writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved since the said order of the Tribunal is not being implemented. We dispose of this writ petition by directing the respondents to forthwith implement the said order of the Tribunal. 3. Writ petition is thus disposed of. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 08.10.2010 Avneet