IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No.32426 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 21, 2011 Om Parkash Chahal ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The threat perception to an individual citizen is basically required to be appreciated by the law enforcing agencies. From the averment made, it would appear that the petitioner, being President of some Scheduled Caste Organisation, is wanting security more as a status symbol. This can be so made out from his prayer where he has pleaded that at least one gunman be provided to him. In my view, there is no apparent threat to the life and liberty of the petitioner. No case for issuing any direction for providing security to the petitioners is made out. Dismissed. October 21, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE