IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. lsL No. Bag} /201o pETrrIONER: /Chhagan Lal Shanna S/o 0nkar /,Aé\ Prasad Shanna, aged about 55 years, Head Master, Government Primary School, Oudan Block- Palari Distt. Raipur (0.6.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: — Secretary, Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) /< 2. The District-Education Officer, Educational District Baluoda Bazar District Raipur .(C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Block Palari V Educational District Baluoda Bazar District Raipur (C.G.') WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. WRARTICULARS OF THEHPETITIONER: \ / HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA Present: - Shri Ashwani Shukla. counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Panel Lawyer for the State.‘ ORAL 0RDER- (Passed an 14‘" July, 2010) The petitioner was initially appointed as Deputy Teacher on a Fixed pay of Rs.100/-. After completion of his probation period, he was granted regular pay scale of Rs.1 69-300I-. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that he issue t involved in the case is as to whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale with effect from the date of initial appointment or after completion of probation period. 3. The issue involved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in OA.No.2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 Others v. State ofM.P. & others). wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale with effect from the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon‘ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from the date of initial appointment. WRIT PETITION (51 No.3453I2010 PETITIONER Chhagan Lal Sharma Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh and Others Court. while considering the same issue in Amar Sai’Ram & Othm v. State of ‘Chhattisgam & Others, W.P.(S).No.4725/2006, by order dated 01-09-2006, allowed the petitioners to make a representation within a period of raising all the grievances. ten days. subject to verification of the facts. 6. in view of the foregoing. this petition. is disposed of. Na order as to costs. ;. Sd/- ' 4 Manindra Mohan Shrivastgya; l . Judge