IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18632 of 2010 RAJENDRA SAW, son of Late Anantu Sao, R/O Village & P.O.-Nadaul, P.S.-Masaurhi, District-Patna. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary, Law Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. President, Bihar State Board of Religious Trust, Vidyapuri Marg, Patna-800001. 3. The Bihar State Board of Religious Trust, through its President having office at Vidyapuri Marg, Patna-800001. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 15.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr Ganpati Trivedi, learned counsel for the respondent-Board and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 31st of January, 2006 from the post of Hindi Stenographer, contributory provident fund as also some of the admissible retiral dues as highlighted in this writ application have not been settled and paid. Learned counsel for the respondent-Board submits that from the averments made in the writ application it is not clear as to what are the exact claims, which are to be settled. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the claims as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a detailed representation before the President, Bihar State Board of Religious Trust, Patna (respondent no.2). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of his unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of - 2 - such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid with interest permissible under the rules. However, upon consideration, if any of the claims or any part of the claims is found not admissible, the same may be informed to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)