IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.148 of 2008 SHIVA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 15.1.2009 KHAN In the instant case the petitioner prays for concluding the investigation of Karza P.S. Case No.101 of 2006 dated 9.10.2006 in which she alleged that the accused persons have kidnapped her son. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State stating therein that Upendra Mahto, the son of the petitioner, in fact has not been kidnapped rather he has adopted a saintly life. As such the police has submitted final form not finding the allegation to be true. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at least Upendra Mahto ought to have been produced in the court. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, it would be open to the petitioner to move before the learned Magistrate for redressal of her grievance. With the aforesaid observation, this writ petition stands disposed of. (S.P.Singh,J)