IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No 7756 of 2009 Pramod Kumar Singh, Constable No 941370206, son of late Baleshwar Singh, resident of Village – Semari, P S – Mashrakh, District – Siwan - Petitioner Versus 1) The Union of India through the I G, Central Industrial Security Force, Eastern Sector, H Q, Boring Road, Patna 2) The AIG, CISF, R&S, New Delhi 3) The DIG, Central Industrial Security Force, Eastern Zone HQ, Patliputra Colony, Patna 4) The Group Commandant, Group Headquarters, CISF, Patna 5) The Commandant, CISF Unit, Phulwarisharif 6) The Commandant, CISF Unit, NALCO, Damanjodi - Respondents ----------- 2 10.07.2009 The petitioner is an employee under the Central Industrial Security Force. On medical illness ground of sickness of his father, he was posted at Patna who died immediately thereafter. Since death of father, mother, it is alleged, is in semi unconscious stage for a long time. There is none else to look after the mother. He was posted at Patna in 2007. In 2008, he was being posted outside when he represented on the aforesaid ground and his transfer was cancelled. He has once again been transferred and posted outside Patna to a station where proper medical facility is not available. He represented but has received no response except movement order asking him to move. In the writ petition, he stated that under the same Force, there are people who are posted at Patna for 7 to 10 years. They are not being touched but petitioner, who has a genuine reason to stay at Patna for sometime, is being discriminated. Having considered the matter, in my view, petitioner, 2 being a Member of Uniform Force, has to face consequences thereof. Keeping in view the facts noted above as well as the facts that he has not yet completed 3 years at Patna and allegedly others, who have been at Patna for almost a decade, are not being moved, I direct the petitioner to make a representation to I G, CISF immediately who would consider all the fats, as noted in this order and any other relevant fact which the petitioner may bring on record and dispose of the representation by a speaking order within one week of its receipt. With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. For a period of 10 days, the parties would maintain status quo. M.E.H./ (Navaniti Prasad Singh)