IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No. 1265 of 2006(O&M) Date of Decision: September 30, 2011. Kaur Singh. ...... APPELLANT (s) Versus Harbans Kaur and others. ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Appellant in person with his counsel Mr. S.K.Singla, Advocate for the appellant. Respondent no.1 in person with her counsel Mr. V.K.Kataria, Advocate for respondent no.1. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) RSA No.1699 of 2011 The present regular second appeal has been filed against judgment and decree dated 09.06.2008 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Moga accepting appeal filed by respondent no.1-plaintiff against judgment and decree dated 09.12.2005 passed by learned Civil Judge(Junior Division), Moga vide which suit filed by respondent no.1-plaintiff was dismissed. It has been stated by learned counsel for the parties that parties being near relatives and the dispute being family dispute has since been settled between the parties as per Compromise, Annexure C-1. Original Compromise, Annexure C-1 has been placed on record in RSA No.1265 of 2006 and copy of the same has also been placed on record in this RSA. Hence, it is requested that the present appeal be decided in terms of Compromise, Annexure C-1 and the suit filed by respondent no.1-plaintiff be also decreed in terms of the said compromise. Hence, in view of these facts, the present appeal is partly accepted and the impugned judgment and decree passed by learned courts below is modified to the extent in terms of Compromise, Annexure C-1. Compromise, Annexure C-1 shall form part of decree sheet. Disposed of accordingly. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) September 30, 2011. JUDGE 'om’ 2