IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6786 of 2010 DASO MANJHI son of Katiman Manjhi, r/o village Kanan, P.S. Jhajha, Dist. Jamui ….Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 26.2.2010 Heard Mr. Amrendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ansarul Haque, learnedA.P.P. for the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case instituted under section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequently offence under section 411 of the Indian Penal Code was also added. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is not named in the first information report and there is no allegation of theft against the petitioner. According to him, only allegation against the petitioner is that he had received one stolen motorcycle but he had no knowledge or information that motorcycle in question was stolen one and, therefore, no case under section 411 I.P.C. was made out. The petitioner is in judicial custody since 13.10.2009. It is further submitted that the petitioner is a man of fair antecedent and there is no criminal history against him. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Jamui in connection with Jhajha P.S. case No. 252 of 2009, subject to the condition that one of the bailors must be either his family member or close relations and secondly if the petitioner is made an accused in similar case in future, then it shall be open for the prosecution to file a petition for cancellation of bail of the petitioner and if such a petitioner is filed, the court below will be obliged to consider the same in accordance with law after - 2 - giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) M.Rahman