CRM No. M 26391 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 26391 of 2010 Date of decision: 01.02.2011 Gurvinder Singh ........ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. P S Mirpur, Advocate for Mr. Amrik Singh Kalra, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for seeking direction to respondents No. 2 and 3 to conduct fair and impartial investigation in false cases planted upon (i) Ajit Singh (ii) Sukhwinder Singh (father and brother of petitioner) i.e. State v. Ajit Singh and Sukhwinder Singh bearing FIR No. 81 dated 06.07.2010 under Section 61 of Punjab Excise Act (P1), State v. Sukhwinder Singh bearing FIR No. 82 dated 08.07.2010 under Section 18 of NDPS Act (P2) and State v Ajit Singh bearing FIR No. 83 dated 08.07.2010 under Section 18 of NDPS Act (P3) at Police Station Goindwal Sahib. CRM No. M 26391 of 2010 2 Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab, on instructions from Inspector- Malkiat Singh, states that the aforesaid three FIRs are pending against Ajit Singh and Sukhwinder Singh i.e. father and brother of the petitioner. In FIR Nos. 81, 82 and 83, challans have been presented in Court on 01.09.2010 and 16.09.2010 and charges have been framed on 23.09.2010, 16.09.2010, and 18.11.2010, respectively. From the above, it is clear that the challans in all the FIRs were filed even before the issuance of notice of motion in the present petition. The matter is now before the Court. Accordingly, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and dismissed as such. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 01.02.2011 mohan