IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1269 of 2009 1.JAGDISH MAHTO, son of Late Narain Mahto. 2.SHANTI DEVI, wife of Jagdish Mahto. both resident of Village-Barabadih, P.S. Dumaria, Distt. Gaya. 3.UPENDRA PRASAD @ UPENDRA PRASAD DOGI, son of Gopal Prasad 4.SHILA DEVI, wife of Upendra Prasad Dogi both resident of Village Babhandih, P.S. Imamganj, District Gaya, presently residing at Village Barbadih, P.S. Dumariya, Distt. Gaya. 5.KANCHAN PRASAD @ KANCHAN KUMAR, son of Gopal Prasad, resident of Village Babhandih, P.S. Imamganj, District Gaya. ---------Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.2.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The offence alleged against the petitioners, who are apprehending their arrest in connection with Imamganj P.S. Case No.12 of 07, is under sections 498A, 379, 494 and other allied sections of the Penal Code and section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the informant had filed the present F.I.R. on account of certain misconception. However, co-accused-the husband of the informant has been allowed regular bail by the court below. It is further submitted that in paragraph 11 of the petition it is stated that the informant is living with her husband in her matrimonial home after the matter was compromised. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, 2 let petitioners no.1 to 5 above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Imamganj P.S. Case No.12 of 07 corresponding to G.R. No.146 of 07, within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati at Gaya, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)