@ Petltjoner Non-appiicant Responcient Appijcant HjQH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH ATBSLASPUR Wrst Petition (Art.227) No.30S9 of 230§ Diiip Ratre, S/'o Panchram Ratre, aged about 24 years, PJo Kohadlya, Poslce Station-KofrwaSJ, Korba, DJstrict-Korba (C.G.) Versus Smt.Veona Ratro, W/o Diiip Ratre, aged about 23 years, R/Q Behind the Govemment Higher Secondary School, Paii, Tahsii-Paii, District-Korba (C.G.) (Writ Fstition under ArticiQ 227 ofthe ConstStution of india) 1r.A\¥adhTripathi, counsei forthe petitioner. Ir.Ratnesh Kumar Agrawai, counsei for the respondont. (SB: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma. J.) ORDER (12-9-2011) 1. By this writ petition under Articie 227 of the Constltution of india the petffioner has chaiienged the iegaiity & propriety of the order dated 7.11.2008 passed by the Judge, Famiiy Court, Camp Court, Katghora in Civi! Sult No.26/2008, whereby by framing the issue reiating to main^nabi!ity of independent petitionunder Section 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 the Judge Famiiy Court has heid that indspendent petition under Soctlon 27 of t'ne Hindu Marriage Act l.e. in absenoo of any othor proceeding is mainteinabie. 2. Loarned counsoj for the petitioner submite that InltiaiSy Civil Rovteion (PR) No.770 of 2009 was fiied by the pstitioner, but the same was dismissed ss withdrawn vide order dated 9l April, 2009. Learned counsel further submjts that virtuaiiy this is the order on the issue framed by ths Coyrt bolow as issue No.2, therefore, the order bsing not jnteriocutory, appeai Is mslnfeainabie under Section 19(1) of the Famiiy Courts Act, 1984, tharsfore, he seeks to withdraw this v/rit petition with liberty to fii©appeai under Sedion 19(1) of the Famiiy Courts Act, 1984. 3. The writ petition is dlsmisssd as withdrawn with ttie aforesaid Siberty. Certifjod copy of the order be fQtumed to tho counsoi for the potitloner after furnishing duiy photostat copy of the same. No order as to costs. 4. Sntonm appiication stands disposed of. ^ Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge