1 CRA 1089/10 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 1089 OF 2010 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. B.M. Salunkhe for the applicants. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 13TH JANUARY 2011 P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. This revision application is directed against a judgment and order passed by the appellate Bench of the Small Causes Court, Mumbai, confirming the decree for eviction passed by the trial Court. 3. Admittedly, the rent was not paid within one month from the date of receipt of the notice of demand. The Court below therefore 2 CRA 1089/10 committed no error in passing the decree for possession. No interference is called for in exercise of revisional jurisdiction under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The revision application is rejected summarily. 4. At the request of the learned counsel for the applicants, the applicants are granted 6 months time for vacating the suit premises subject to filing of an undertaking of themselves and their family members in this Court in the usual form within 3 weeks. In the event the undertaking is not filed, the stay shall stand automatically vacated. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)