IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33909 of 2009 RAM VINAY PASWAN, S/o Late Khedan Paswan, Resident of Village-Gosaipur, Post-Jahangirpur, P.S.- Shympur, Bhatha, District-Shivhar. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 13.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 302/34of the Indian Penal Code. It is being submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report and subsequently he was named by one named FIR accused person and therefore there is no legal evidence against the petitioner. However, from the impugned order it appears that the petitioner has remained absconding for 14 years due to which the trial was held up. Now, I am informed by a supplementary-affidavit revealing that three witnesses have been examined during trial but all three of them have been declared hostile. Taking into consideration the afore- mentioned facts, let the petitioner above named be - 2 - released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional District and Sessions Judge cum F.T.C.-III, Sitamarhi in connection with Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 66 of 1994 (S.Tr. No. 551 of 2006) on the condition that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The petitioner is directed to be well represented on each date during trial and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)