IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. LPA No. 105 of 2011. Decided on: 27.7.2011. __________________________________________________________ State of H.P. & others. … Appellants. Versus Nand Kali. … Respondent. __________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the appellant : Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. AG and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG. For the respondents : None. ___________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral). CMP(M) No. 415 of 2010 Application is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. LPA No. 105 of 2011 2. Respondent-State has filed an appeal against the judgment of the learned Single Judge in CWP(T) No. 15678 of 2008, dated 06.04.2010. It is seen from the judgment that both the sides had submitted before the Court that judgment that would apply in the case of the petitioner is Phool Maya vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others. However, there was a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the judgment in Mool Raj Upadhaya vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others. It is made clear that the case of the petitioner shall be considered in the light of the decision in Phool Maya vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others. 3. In view of the above, the appeal is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice. (Justice V.K. Sharma) July 27, 2011. Judge. (cr/virender)