IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3805 of 2011 1. SHAILENDRA MAHTO, SON OF RAJENDRA MAHTO. 2. RAJ KUMARI DEVI, WIFE OF SRI SHAILENDRA MAHTO. BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-ASHARAFPUR, P.S.- NAGARNAUSHA, DISTRICT-NALANDA AS PER FIR BOTH RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE-KANHAIPUR, P.S.-MOKAMA, DISTRICT-PATNA. 3. RAJWANTI DEVI, WIFE OF SRI DINA MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-KANHAIPUR, P.S.-MOKAMA, DISTRICT- PATNA. ……….Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 15.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner being mother, sister and other family members are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 498A, 201 and 34 of the I.P.C. During investigation, accusation was found false and the final form was submitted consequently the petitioners were not sent up for trial. Admittedly, the victim died within two years of her marriage. It is further submitted that against other accused persons, the charge sheet was submitted under Section 306 of the I.P.C. Differing with the final form learned court below took cognizance against the petitioners also. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on anticipatory bail, in the 2 event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh, Patna in connection with Mokama P.S. Case No.128/2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. PN ( Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)