IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28501 of 2009 NAVIN SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 3.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner is one of the accused who on the point of pistol took the key of Almirah and took out cash from the said Almirah. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner was an employee of M/s Hari Construction, so for non-fulfilment of dues this case has been lodged which appears defence only. He is associate of Phulo Singh who really took away the cash. Thus I find it not a fit case for anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner is rejected. A.I (Mandhata Singh, J.)