GPN-J.332-ARCHB-8.94-1310500-ALA4 Spl-H.C.A.S.C.D.79e FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.2001 of PETITION NO.2001 of PETITION NO.2001 of 2004 2004 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ----------------------------------------------------------- None present for Petitioner Mr. Vineet B. Naik, for Respondent No.4. Mr.C.R.Sonawane,A.G.P.for Respondent No.1 CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & S.P. KUKDAY,JJ S.P. KUKDAY,JJ S.P. KUKDAY,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 4th February, 2005 : 4th February, 2005 : 4th February, 2005 P.C. . The Planning Authority had recommended to Respondent No.1 to dereserve a part of the land owned by the petitioner. The Respondent No.1 appointed Respondent No.2 to exercise the powers under Section 162(1) of the M.R.T.P. Act. The same was notified. The petitioner herein suggested that instead of deserving only 0.37 Hector which was half of the land as proposed by Respondent No.4 the entire land should be dereserved. The Respondent No.2, it appears, had rejected the recommendation both of Respondent NO.4 and the suggestion of the petitioner herein and has maintained the reservation of the plot. This is the subject matter of the present petition. 2. When the matter is called out none present for the petitioner. Petition dismissed for non-prosecution. (F.I. (F.I. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) (S.P. (S.P. (S.P. KUKDAY, J.) KUKDAY, J.) KUKDAY, J.)