1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 823 PF 2004 1 Laxman Sakharam Tambe and another .. Appellants Versus 1. Smt. Suman Laxman Tambe and another .. .. Respondents Shri Madde, Advocate h/f Shri G. V. Wani, Advocate for the Appellants. Shri V. S. Bedre, Advocate for the Respondents. CORAM : N. D. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 07TH DECEMBER, 2009. ORAL ORDER : 1. Heard Shri Madde, learned counsel holding for Shri G. V. Wani, learned counsel for the appellants. Shri V. S. Bedre learned counsel for the respondents is opposing the second appeal for admission. It is pointed out that there are concurrent findings of both the Courts below. The suit of the respondents came to be decreed for declaration and possession. The First Appeal preferred by the present appellants came to be dismissed on merit. The plaintiff as legally wedded wife is held proved by both the Courts below and that was the only issue before the Trial Court. Therefore, the respondents counsel Shri Bedre urged for 2 dismissal of the appeal, there is no other substantial dispute or substantial question of law, keep back the matter at the request of Shri Madde. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] bsb/Dec.09