IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (PIL) No. 582 of 2008 Gokul Chandra Naugai .……… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ……… Respondents Mr. I.D. Paliwal, Advocate for the petitioner. J.P. Joshi, Chief Standing Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. V.K. GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) After hearing the learned counsel for the parities, we dispose of this petition at the admission stage by permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation addressed to respondent No.2. If a fresh representation is filed by the petitioner within two weeks from today, we direct that respondent No.2, respondent No.3 and respondent No.4 shall jointly sit together and consider and dispose of the petitioner’s fresh representation by passing a speaking order. They shall do the needful within four weeks from the date of the receipt of the representation. Depending on the order that is passed on this representation, the State Government shall take consequential action. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) (V.K. Gupta, C. J.) 24.07.2008 24.07.2008 Shiv/VK