S.B. C. Writ Petition No. 980/2010. (Shishupal Meena Vs. Malviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur) Date of Order: 07/04/2010. HON'BLE MR. MOHAMMAD RAFIQ,J. Mr Anand Sharma, for the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the petitioner has been serving the respondent Malviya National Institute of Technology (MNIT) on the post of Class-IV employee ever since August, 1998 continuously without there being any protection of interim order passed by this Court or any other court. The learned counsel submitted that number of posts are available with the respondents and that the case of the petitioner is liable to be considered for regularization as per the direction of the Supreme Court contained in Para 53 of its judgment reported in Secretary, State of Karnataka Vs. Uma Devi, (2006) 9 SCC 1. The learned counsel submitted that in this respect the Government has issued a circular to grant such benefit of regularization to all such employees who have been in service of the Government and its various undertakings for more than 10 years. Having regard to the nature of controversy and the fact that petitioner has been working with the respondents continuously for more than 12 years without there being any interim order, the petitioner would be at liberty to make a representation to the respondent Institute producing therewith a copy of the judgment in Uma Devi (supra) and the circular issued by the Government. The respondents shall decide such -2- representation within a period of three months from the date of its keeping in view the above facts. Till the representation is not disposed of, the respondents are expected not to discontinue the services of the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ),J. Gandhi/-P.A. Item no. 53