•^."^-.j-.. j-'.'^^r^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. No. 2-4 M-?; /2003 ^jR y Respondents ANIRUDHDHA GAUTAM, S/Q Late Teerath Prasad Gautam aged about 2^years, R/o village Deori, Post Pindarai, P.S. Dheemerkheda, Distt. Katani M.P. VERSUS The Chairman, Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, / Raipur (C.G.) / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CON8TITUTION OF INDIA l"w; !11 ' ' ~^~. ^' ^ ill !\. <lt! 1 \, iaii,'' HIGH COURT OF (^mATTISGASm ATBILASPUR • 113'<^W?11 S SS\fES'SSSLf& BitS&» v.f^J?S»li%JfS& S'£ULS.1S.S6£h£fKJhi PETITIONER RESPOKDENT versus Anirud&dha C}autam The Chairman, Chhattisgarh State Electricily Board, Raipur(eG) Shri PrafuU Bharat, counsel for fhe petitiouer. WRITPETITIONUmffBRARfIGLES 226/22'? OB' THE GONSTFroTION OF mPIA ORDER j26.08.a0t0) Through this petttion, fhs petitioner is seekiag eompassioiiate appoiiitment pii the ground tliat hi§ fafher late Teerafl:i prasad Gautam. was an emplpyee of M.P. State Electricity Board aud had expired on 16.7.85. The grievance of the pefitioner is fhat fiiipugh he is entitled for compassionate appoiatuient, sanie has not been given to hun. ' ^".:. ! ' • : : • • . ' : From fhe pleadings and the docuiiients, the undisputed fact is that faftier of the petitioner died in tlie year 1985 whereas the present petition ftself was filed before fhls Coiirt on 29.7.2003. The inQrdmate delay in fiUng fhe petifion has notSeenexplainedproperlvbythepefifioner. I find no reason to interfere with fhe presenf petition. The saiue is highly belated and has no substance, it is aceordinglv dismissed. Sd/- Prifinker Diwaker -, Judge II,