IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 6674 of 1986 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- A A RAVAL Versus REGISTRAR -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR BP TANNA for Petitioner M/S MG DOSHIT & CO for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH Date of decision: 23/06/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution the petitioner has challenged the order dated 1.10.1986 passed by the then Registrar of this Court under which the petitioner was allowed to receive Rs. 950/- out of the amount of Rs. 1600/- received by him as remuneration for working as a Commissioner partly outside office hours and partly during office hours and the duties performed by him were outside office hours. At the time of hearing of this petition, the Court is informed that the petitioner has already retired from service. There is none present on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition. Hence this petition is dismissed as not pressed more particularly in view of the fact that the petitioner has already retired and there is none to prosecute the petition on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called out even in the second round. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Rule is discharaged. (M.S. SHAH, J) (pkn)