IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 6251 of 2011 Decided on: 8th September, 2011. Anoop Singh. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Neeraj K. Sharma, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “(i) That the respondents may kindly be directed to release the grant-in-aid to the petitioner w.e.f. June, 2006 with interest and all other consequential benefits while quashing the notification/Rule, if any, which debars the petitioner.” 2. There is no reply as yet. It is for the second respondent to take appropriate action in the matter. There will be a direction to the second respondent to look into the matter and take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the second respondent. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 8th September, 2011. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (tr) Judge.