IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN MONDAY, THE 15TH MARCH 2010 / 24TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 3069 of 2010(G) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ RIYASUDHEEN,S/O.JALEEL,9/224,PARAKUNNU, PALAKKAD. BY ADVS. MR.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL, SMT.AMBIKA RADHAKRISHNAN. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD REP.BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY,REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,PALAKKAD. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADERMR. MUHAMMED HASHIM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.3069/2010 G APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE DECISION OF THE FIRST RESPONDENT AT ITS MEETING HELD ON 17/01/2007 IN ITEM NO.S31. P2: COPY OF NOTICE NO.G/2202/2003/P DTD. 2/06/2007. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss K. SURENDRA MOHAN, J. ------------------------------------------------------------ W.P(C) NO:3069 OF 2010 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th March, 2010. JUDGMENT The petitioner had applied for the grant of a regular permit on the route Kothamangalam-Palakkad. The said permit has been granted as per Ext.P1 decision of the RTA at its meeting held on 17.1.2007. Thereafter the timing conference was scheduled for the settlement of his timings. However, the petitioner did not appear or participate in the timing conference. Therefore, the same was adjourned indefinitely. According to the petitioner his non- participation was due to unavoidable problems which were intimated to the second respondent also. Now the petitioner has purchased a brand new vehicle with registration KL-2/P-9764. He has also submitted an application for the replacement of his vehicle. He complains that no orders have been passed on his applications till date. Therefore, he seeks appropriate directions for the disposal of his applications on an early date. The Govt. Pleader has no objection to such directions being issued. 2. In the above circumstances this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to settle the timings of the petitioner and to issue the regular permit that was sanctioned to him on WPC 3069/2010 2 17.1.2007, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Appropriate orders shall be passed on the application of the petitioner for replacement of his vehicle also which is pending. K. SURENDRA MOHAN Judge jj WPC 3069/2010 3 K.K.DENESAN & V. RAMKUMAR, JJ. ---------------------------------------------------- M.F.A.NO: ----------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT Dated: