IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 27TH MARCH 2008 / 7TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 10364 of 2008(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ---------------- VIJAYAKUMAR P.S. PUTHENKATTIL HOUSE, SRINGAPURAM, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.BOSE SRI.VINOD MADHAVAN SMT.NISHA BOSE RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THRIUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, P.W.D.(R & B), CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALUVA. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 10364 OF 2008 H ==================== Dated this the 27th day of March, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner had responded to Ext.P1 tender notice and was the successful tenderer for collection of tolls at Thachampilly bridge. It is stated that following Ext.P3, toll was allowed to be collected in respect of another bridge which is within 15 kms of Thachampilly bridge. Thereupon, the petitioner submitted Ext.P4 objecting to the same. 2. In view of the pendency of Ext.P4 before the 2nd respondent, the relief sought for in this writ petition is for a direction to the said respondent to consider the same. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of directing that, if Ext.P4 has been received by the 2nd respondent, the said respondent shall take up and consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp