gmw gmw 7 Cf ?WL / CD w.P.(S) No. gqiw 12006 PETITIONER’S I / 1. Parmeshwar Lal Tandey, S/o. Shri Sadanand Tandey, Aged about — 35 yrs., Assistant Teacher Govt. Hr. Sec. School, Misda, Block — Nawagarh Distt. — Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Birbal Prasad Sonwani, S/o. Shri Parshu Ram Sonwani, Aged about 38 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School Nariyara, Block-Malkharoda, Distt. — Janjgir—Champa (C.G.) Smt. Mahesh Kumari Manhar, W/o. Shri Krishna Kumar Manhar, Aged about 33 years, Assistant Teacher Govt. Middle School, Jaijaipur, Block— Jaijaipur Distt. — Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ,. 3. VERSUS RESPONDENT’S State of Chhattisgrh, Through — The Secretary Department of Education D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Ofticer, Distt.-Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Deputy Director, Education Distt.-Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) /2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH ® WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF‘ THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA for ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT, WRITS, DIRECTION ETC. TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. f $lN$lv§ EgNCH = HON'BL# MR- §ATI§H K $9NIH0TEL a!» WRIT PETI ! lg 1&1 N6, 5971 QF 20% Prawn: : Mr. A.S.Rajput, counsel for the‘vpetiu'oners. Miss Deepall Pandey, Panel Lawyer for the' respondentslshte. ' OR R (Passed on ofNovember,2006 By this petition under Alticles 226/227 of he Common 1 ‘ of India. the petitioners soak a direction to the rospondenb to pay mo incremonts and seniority on he basis of tho date-of ihoir initial appointmenis in the light of the decision rendered‘by mo loarnod state ‘ Administrative Tribunal. Jabalpur in Original Applicadon 'uo..1452yovr 1998 (Han'sh Chend Singh end others vs. Slate of MP. end chore}. -‘ dated 31-1-2000. OriginalrApplinatian Nam of'1998 (Akhibah Mid"! > and olhere- vs. State of Mya’PrademendodoemlandhOriginal Application No.991 of 1998 (Remeyen Preeed DMwdi and omen vs.- Staie ofM.P. and others). 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners placed on record a oopy of ihe order dated 20s9-2006 passed by this court in Writ Peitionets Parmeshwar Ld Tandey and other: . versug R¢$p¢m$ms Shh of Omanwamandothersx € O Petition (8.) No.5137 of 2006 ‘(Meghnjr Tam V6. Shh of Chhatlisgarh and others) and submns‘that the pwh‘onm ate similarly ‘ situated, therefore me similar order mum passed. 3. ' The cases cf unpeMonets anlthatm‘mrapmlnw « as Assistant Teachers Vin mt School Edunwon Dcpanment on probation for a period of two years with me nxed saiary. Howeverdater r on, after rcomplwon of two years' probatian. the petitioners wen regularized. but, they. were not given m0 regalar paym: char: similarly situated teachers maved tha State: Administuiiw Trikunal‘ Jabalpur for regular pamala, wharein leamed Tribunal; vHi‘ order dated 31-1-2000. allowed the same. The petidonere mede'severai- representations to aooord the same treatment esthey are-also rslmiluly > situated teachers, but, the respondensehave not, paid any heed; Thus. this poition. x( 4. petidoners may be allowed to r'nake a representation to respondent, No.1 to give similar treatment to the paddonors and: the same pamale which has been sanctioned to other simy situated teachers on r account of the order otthe State Administrahve Trtbumi-v dated 3.1-1- 2000‘, to which teamed counsel fot the respondenwstate has no I objection. Leamed counsel for the podtioners submit mat the 5. Having heard teamed counuiyfer the parties and having . regard to me m and cireumstancos of the case. in the opinionofmb Court. the iimited prayer made by learned counsels/fer die petidoners‘ appears to be reasonable. Therefore,-the pedtiom are wowed to " make a representwen within a peried» ofrm rm from wday-tior respondent‘NoA. raising an their grievanoeeand; in mm, respendent ‘ No.1 shall dedde the said represenwiien in an objeciive manner wimirr , a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of such representadon; after considering ali the points raised hy me pehdoners. and takingr'into i account the order dated 31-1~2000 passed by the teamed sute Administrative Tribunal in OriginaiAppiication' No.1452 of 1998. and if the petitioners stand on the same footings. as the petitioners in the Origins! Application No.1452 of 1998, than they be also senedoned the same pay-scale and seniority. 6. aforesaid‘dlraction. No order asto cos‘s. Certified copy as per rules. f Subhish Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge The writ petition is accordlngiy disposed of withthe , ‘