1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.39 OF 1994 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 307 OF 1993 Suman Gurav ...Plaintiff. Vs. Dilip D. Gurav and anr ...Defendants Mr. Vijendra Jabra, for the Plaintiff. Mr. J.M. Chodankar, for the Defendants. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 2nd March, 2010. P.C.- 1. In the testamentary suit, the parties have settled the matter out of the Court and accordingly signed the consent terms, taken on record and marked ‘X’. The contents are explained in vernacular language to the parties which they also understood. A statement is made that the consent terms are well within the framework of law and record and no third party and/or person will be affected by these consent terms. There is no dispute/objection with regard to the signature, authorization and identity of the parties. Plaintiff as well as the defendant are present in the Court. 2. As it is a settlement between the family members, suit as well as the petition stand disposed of in view of consent terms. The decree be drawn accordingly. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)