SSM 1 26.aba.319.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 319 OF 2011 Umesh Kapurchand Rathod ....Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra ....Respondent ______________ Mr. P. G. Sarada for the Applicant. Mrs. P. P. Shinde, APP for the Respondent – State. CORAM: R. C. CHAVAN, J. DATED : 25 TH APRIL, 2011. P.C.: This is an Application for Anticipatory Bail by a person who has alleged to have committed offences punishable under Section 328 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 65 (f) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The C.A.'s report does not show that any poison was found in the samples taken. The report shows that one of the samples contained 11% ethyl alcohol, which could be used for distillation of intoxicating liquor, and the other sample contained 7% of ethyl alcohol in water. 2. In view of this, it is not clear as to why the applicant should be subjected to any custodial interrogation. Hence, in the event of applicant's arrest in the C.R.No.84 of 2010 registered with Solapur SSM 2 26.aba.319.11 Taluka Police Station, he be released on bail on furnishing PR Bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate sum of Rs.25,000/- on the following conditions :- i) The applicant shall make himself available on 2 nd May, 2011 at 11.00 a.m. for interrogation by Investigating Officer and thereafter as and when required Investigating Officer. ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. iii)The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the trial Court. iv) The application stands disposed of accordingly. (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)