IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 1274 of 2011 Date of decision : 24.01.2011 Vishnu ...Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. Jangvir Singh Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) The pointed grievance emanating from the record is that although, the petitioner made representation (Annexure P-1) but no action has yet been taken on it. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and going through the record, the instant writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.3 to decide the representation (Anneuxre P-1), within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order, in accordance with law. (Mehinder Singh Sullar) Judge January 24, 2011 naresh.k