IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11854 of 2011 Raj Nandan Singh, son of Sri Shyam Nandan Singh, resident of village Pilitch, P.O. Pilitch, P.S. Parwalpur, District Nalanda, State Bihar … Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Secretary, Building Construction Department, “Vishweshwaraiya Bhawan”, Bailey Road, Patna. 2. The Engineer-in-Chief, Building Construction Department, “Vishweshwaraiya Bhawan”, Bailey Road, Patna. 3. The Chief Engineer (South), Building Construction Department, “Vishweshwaraiya Bhawan”, Bailey Road, Patna-1 4. The Superintending Engineer, Patna Building Circle, Rajvanshi Nagar, Patna-23. 5. The Executive Engineer, Building Construction Department, Works Division, D. Ml Colony, Biharsharif (Nalanda). … Respondents ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Manish Sahay, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Toirendra Kumar, A.C. to S.C.12 --------- 02/ 28.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for directing respondent-authorities to pay all the admitted dues with interest to the petitioner for the contractual works admittedly completed by him on the eve of visit programme of the Chief Minister at different places of Nalanda district as per work orders dated 26.11.2008 and 21.12.2008 respectively. 3. Considering the averments made by learned counsel for the petitioner and the materials on record, this writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the Executive Engineer, Building Construction Department, Works Division, Nalanda (respondent no. 5) by filing an application giving details of the amounts due and interest thereon. If such an application is 2 filed by the petitioner along with a copy of this order within fifteen days from today, the said authority shall consider the same in accordance with law and shall decide it by a speaking order within four months thereafter and if any amount or interest is found to be admitted and payable, the same should be paid to the petitioner immediately thereafter. However, if any amount or interest is not found to be admitted or payable in the said order, the petitioner will be at liberty to challenge the same before an appropriate forum. MPS/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )