IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6353 of 2011 1. ASHOK RAI 2. HARESH RAI @ HARESH KUMAR 3. BIRENDRA RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 21.06.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of demand of dowry and killing the niece of the informant and her son by causing acid injury. The postmortem report does not reflect any acid injury, however, the dead body was completely dicomposed. Since, the petitioner no.3 is the husband, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner no. 3. So far as petitioner nos. 1 and 2 being the brothers of the husband are concerned, there is general accusation against the entire family members and the case diary does not reflect any specific evidence 2 against them, let the above named petitioner nos. 1 and 2, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Chapra Mufassil P.S. Case No. 136/2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)