IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU WRIT PETITION NO : 13875 of 2001 Between: 1 Dar-Us-Salam Educational Trust, Dar-Us-Salam, Hyderabad. Rep by its Trustee & Secretary-Syed Akbar Nizamuddin Hussain S/o. Late Hazrat Syed Mohd.Shah Qutubuddin Hussini R/o. Hyderabad. 2 Deccan Collega of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad. Rep by its Principal, Ch.Habeebullah, R/o. Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Government of India, Rep by its Secretary Ministry of Defence, Department of Defence New Delhi. 2 The Director General Defence Estates, Ministry of Defence, West Block-IV, R.K.Puram, New Delhi. 3 Government of India, Rep by its Secretary, Ministry of Health Service, New Delhi. 4 M/S.Appolo Hospitals Pvt.Ltd.,, Rep by its Managing Director, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction of the Respondent in not leasing out the 100 bedded Hospitals of the DRDO Constructed in an extend of A.c.5-00 of land at Kanchanabagh, Hyderabad in favour of the Petitioner-Educational Trust for teaching Hospital Attached to the Second petitioner Medial College as illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory and also declare the action of the respondent 1 to 3 in resorting to the action out the same to the 4th Respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and discriminatory and further direct the respondent 1 to 3 to lease out the 100 bedded hospital of DRDO in favour of the petitioner-trust in the interest of justice and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.UMAPATHY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Dr. JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU WRIT PETITION No. 13875 of 2001 O R D E R: Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. ______________________ G.YETHIRAJULU,J Date:27-02-2008 KLP