:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2200 OF 2008 Kannan Kanna Nagesh P. Shetiyar Devendra ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharshtra ..Respondent Mr. Abhaykumar Apte for applicant. Ms. A.A. Mane, APP for State. CORAM: SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI,J. Date : November 17, 2008. Date : November 17, 2008. Date : November 17, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The learned Advocate appointed for the applicant who has preferred this application through jail is not present. On request of the court, Mr.Abhaykumar Apte has kindly consented to appear in the matter. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The applicant has preferred this application through jail for expediting his trial. The applicant is facing prosecution in Sessions Case No. 36 of 2008. The said case is under Section 395 of I.P.C. :2: and it pertains to C.R. No. 180 of 2007 registered with Karad City Police Station, Karad. It is seen that the applicant is also facing prosecution in case under Section 380 of IPC which is pending before the learned Magistrate, Borivali Court, Mumbai. The said case pertains to C.R. No. 276 of 2007 of Malad Malwani Police Station. In the said case he is on bail. 4. The learned APP states that the trial in Sessions Case No. 36 of 2008 has commenced. Hence, at present, the prayer of the applicant does not survive and the application is disposed of. 5. Needless to say that the applicant shall be produced before the court in Sessions Case No. 36 of 2008 on all dates without fail. 6. Office to communicate this order to the applicant, who is in jail. 7. Office to pay the fees, as per Rule, to Mr.Abhaykumar Apte. :3: (Smt.V.K. Tahilramani,J.) (Smt.V.K. Tahilramani,J.) (Smt.V.K. Tahilramani,J.)