IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46872 of 2008 HARI SAHI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 27/11/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a police case under Sections- 414 of I.P.C. The submission is that there has been no recovery from him. The Choukidar apparently said that the petitioner was the person in custody of the motorcycle suspected to be stolen when he is alleged to have fled away. The petitioner is not aware of any police case with regard to theft of the motorcycle in question. If the petitioner above named surrenders within four weeks the court below before finally accepting his bail-bonds shall call for a report from the Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur with regard to his antecedents and only in the event of a negative report shall proceed to enlarge him on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Aurai P.S. Case No.8 of 2008, subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. - 2 - Should the antecedent report be in the positive, this application shall be deemed to have been rejected. The petitioner shall be required to be physically present when his bail-bonds are furnished and when the matter is finally considered after the antecedent report is received so that in the event of a positive report he shall be immediately taken into custody when his application for regular bail shall be considered by the court below appropriately, in accordance with law, without being prejudiced by the present order. KC ( Navin Sinha, J )