- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1468 OF 2006 Elango Chidambaram ..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ..Respondents .... Mr.A.A.Mirza Advocate for Petitioner None for Respondents .... CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, AND CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, AND CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 01, 2007 DATE : AUGUST 01, 2007 DATE : AUGUST 01, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned advocate for the Petitioner. Apart from expecting the Respondent No.2 to dispose of the Appeal filed by the Petitioner as expeditiously as possible and probably by 30th November, 2007, no interference is called for in the matter at this stage. Keeping all the issues open, with this observation, with liberty to petitioner to place the copy of this order before the concerned appellate authority i.e. Respondent No.2, petition is disposed of. [R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]