IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.6940 OF 2005 Sandeep Laxman Gajghat. ...Petitioner. Vs. The State Election Commission & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr. M. M. Vashi for the Petitioner. Mrs. S.S. Bhende, AGP for Respondent No.1. Mr. R. V. More for Respondent No.2. Mr.A. S. Rao for Respondent No.3. ..... CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ. October 11, 2005. P.C. Rule. Heard forthwith. Heard Learned Counsel for the parties. We have considered the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in Farook Ali Khan s/o Ilyas Khan vs. Maharashtra State Election Commission, 1998(1) ALL MR 9. We have also considered the judgment of the Apex Court in N.P. Ponnuswami vs. The Returning Officer, Namakkal Constituency, Namakkal, Salem District, AIR 1952 SC 64, so also the judgment of the Apex Court in Manda Jaganath Vs. K. S. Rathanam, (2004) 7 SCC 492 and the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Jaspal Singh Arora vs. State of M.P., (1998) 9 SCC 594. Considering the ratio of the said judgments, this is not a fit case where this Court should exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction. Parties have remedy by way of Election Petition. In the light of that, Rule discharged. (F. I. Rebello, J.) (Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)