IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1685 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL ST.NO. 1313 OF 2008 Managing Director, Ramnagar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. ...Applicant VERSUS Mandodari Chagan Lad & ors. ...Respondents ----- Shri A.J.Deshpande, advocate h/f Shri V.D.Gunale, advocate for the applicant Shri A.R.Kale, advocate h/f Shri R.B.Deshmukh, advocate for respondent nos. 1 to 3 and 5 Application dismissed against respondent no.4 Respondent no.6 deleted ----- CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. DATED : 3rd September, 2010 PER COURT :- 1 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2 This is an application preferred by the applicant for condonation of delay of 1410 days in filing the accompanying First Appeal. 3 After considering the rival submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, it appears that the applicant has failed to explain the delay satisfactorily. Moreover, it also appears that the applicant has not accounted for the said delay (2) properly, as it appears that the applicant has not mentioned the date on which he applied for the certified copy and on which date the said certified copy was ready for delivery and on which date the applicant collected the said certified copy of the impugned judgment and order. Moreover, although it is mentioned by the applicant that his advocate was expired, and therefore, the matter remained to be unattended, the applicant has neither given the name of the advocate nor given the date of his death, and accordingly, the applicant has not furnished the full particulars in the reasons stated in the application for condonation of delay. 4 Moreover, it also does not appear that the said delay is not willful, deliberate and intentional. Besides that, the said delay is beyond about four years and no plausible and convincing explanation has been given by the applicant therefor, and hence, the application deserves to be rejected. 7 In the circumstances, the present application bears no substance and same is devoid of any merits and same deserves to be dismissed. 8 In the result, present Civil Application stands dismissed. Registration of First Appeal stands refused. Court fee be refunded as per rules. [ SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.] dbm/ca1685.08