IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25890 of 2010 1. KEDAR NATH PANDEY, SON OF LATE SADHU PANDEY 2. ARUN KUMAR PANDEY, 3. MANAN KUMAR PANDEY, BOTH SONS OF KEDAR NATH PANDEY 4. RAJBHARI DEVI, WIFE OF KEDAR NATH PANDEY, 5. MALA DEVI, WIFE OF TRIBHUWAN TIWARI, DAUGHTER OF KEDAR NATH PANDEY ALL R/O VILLAGE JABDAUL, P.SCHANPATIA, DISTRICT-WEST CHAMPARAN. --PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR –OPP.PARTY 2 24.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and Sri Avinash Kumar Pandey for the complainant informant. All the five petitioners are named accused in this case instituted on the basis of complaint petition. Dispute appearing between the parties is with respect to piece of land purchased by the complainant informant from ancestors of the petitioners. Taking into considering the nature of allegation etc. and no injury being caused, the five petitioners, in the event or their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, are directed to be enlarged on bail on each of them furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with 2 two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, in Chanpatia P.S. Case no. 111 of 2010, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioners no.1, 2 and 3 shall remain present on each and every date before the court below at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier. If the petitioners fail to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad