IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 20763 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION: December 10, 2008 Balbir Singh …Petitioner Versus Union of India and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH Present: Mr. Vivek Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. The petitioner has approached this Court by filing instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution apprehending that the construction raised by him on the land purchased vide registered sale deed dated 7.4.1995 at G.T. Road, Kundli, District Sonepat, which is claimed to be within the Phirni (extended Lal-Dora of Village Kundli, District Sonepat) would be demolished by the officials of the Project Director, National Highways Authority of India-respondent C.W.P. No. 20763 of 2008 No. 3 on the ground that illegal construction has been raised. The petitioner has claimed that no show cause notice in this regard has been issued, however, the officials of respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have visited the premises of the petitioner and asked him verbally to remove the construction. After hearing learned counsel at a considerable length and perusing the paper book with his able assistance, we are of the view that there is no merit in the instant petition and the same is liable to be dismissed being pre-mature. No cause of action has accrued to the petitioner because nothing has been placed on record which could fortify the apprehension of the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed being wholly premature. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (JORA SINGH) December 10, 2008 JUDGE Pkapoor 2