('^ "'-I 'c, 1 '^ COURT OF JUDtCATURE AT BILASPUR. CHHATTISGARH PETiTSONER SiNGLE BENCH: HON'BLE SHRI S.R. NAYAK, CJ. WRST PETITfON N0. 5920 OF 2005 Vijay Kumar Khare, S/o C.L. Khare, about 35 years, R/o Seepat, Naveen Chowk, Bilaspur (C.G.) - RiSPgNDENTS Vs. 1. State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Regionai Transport Authority, Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. Secretary. R.T.A. Biiaspur (C.G.) 4. Sanjay Kumar Yadav, Bus Operator, Bus Stand, Bilaspur (C.G.) Present: Mr. B.K. Ravvat, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Yashwant Singh, leamed G.A., for the State of C.G. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 12th January, 2006) The petitioner is hoiding a reguiar permit on the route Bjiaspur to Champa. In thss writ petltlon, he has sought for mandamus directing respondents 2 and 3 not to grant any temporary permit in the route Bjlaspur to Champa to the fourth respondent and to quash the order granting temporary permit on the route Bilaspur to Champa granted in favour of the fourth respondent. There is no controversy between the parties that without formation of the route, it is not permissibte for the respondents 2 and 3 to grant temporary permit on the route in question. However, quashing of the grant made in favour 28 —2.- of the fourth respondent wQuld not arise, because, the term of the temporary permit spent itseif on 30/11/2005. However, respondents 2 and 3 are not expected to grant temporary permit without formatlon of the route and since there is controversy between the parties as to whethar the formatlon of the route Is done or not, i thlnk that ends of justice wouid be met by directing the respondents 2 and 3 not to grant teniporary permit without formafion of the route. S direot accordingiy. There shali be no order as to costs. — - Sd/- Chief Justice :^:1