IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No 450 of 1994 Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- MOHMADBHAI ABDULBHAI VOHRA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR YOGESH S LAKHANI for Petitioner MR K.P. RAVAL, APP, for Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT Date of decision: 07/03/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. In the present revision under section 394 of the Criminal Procedure Code, challenging the judgement of conviction passed by the Sessions Court in appeal, learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a note in the registry dated 2nd July 1999. In the said note it is pointed out that the petitioner-original accused has expired on 17th August 1988 and therefore the revision would abate. The Xerox copy of the death certificate is also attached. 2. On the above facts, the revision is disposed of accordingly. Rule is discharged. Bail bond cancelled. ******** *ar*