[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION W.P.NO. 4723 OF 2005 Shri.Kalyan Baburao More ..Petitioner Vs. Shri.Anil Dhanpal Upadhye ..Respondent ... Mr.A.P.Kulkarni Advocate for Petitioner ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JANUARY 17, 2008 DATE : JANUARY 17, 2008 DATE : JANUARY 17, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. There was delay in filing the written statement on the part of the petitioner. As the delay in filing written statement was not condoned, the petitioner has preferred this petition. 2. The learned advocate for the petitioner states that thereafter, the respondent i.e. original plaintiff has amended the plaint and the present petitioner was granted leave to file further written statement wherein earlier grounds have also been covered by the petitioner. In this view of the matter, the present writ petition has become infructuous and is disposed of as such. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]