1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 13. CP/311/2007 (MADHUKAR GANGADHAR DIWAN V/S THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Miss Rashmi P.Gour, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr. V.D.Rakh, A.G.P. for respondent State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:22/1/2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard Counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.P. 2. The communication on the part of the Government official was indicated in the petition, however, learned A.G.P., by filing affidavit, has submitted that the action sought was taken, one increment of Shri V.M.Ambhore, Chief Officer, is stopped by taking action in terms of Rule 5 of Maharashtra Civil Services ( Discipline and Appeal Rules) 2 1979. In the light of these submissions, as indicated in the affidavit of Manukumar Shrivastava, nothing survives. Contempt Petition disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/311-07cp