IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.5220 of 2010 Between: Smt.Naveetha ..... Petitioner AND 1.The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad, Hyderabad and another. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri T.Prasanna Kumar Counsel for the Respondents: AGP for Home The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.2, in not arresting accused Nos.5 to 9 in Crime No.534 of 2009 of Alwal Police Station, Cyberabad, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner sought for a consequential direction to respondent No.2 to arrest them. I have heard Sri T.Prasanna Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, representing the respondents. On the complaint given by the petitioner against her husband and 8 others, respondent No.2- Station House Officer registered Crime No.534 of 2009, for the offences punishable under Sections 417, 420, 498-A, 506 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, and filed chargesheet on 11-10-2009 before the jurisdictional Magistrate. The grievance of the petitioner in this Writ Petition is that without any reasons, whatsoever, respondent No.2 has deleted the names of accused Nos.5 to 9 from the said charge sheet. In my opinion, the Writ Petition is not an appropriate remedy as the petitioner is entitled to file a protest petition before the jurisdictional Magistrate against exclusion of accused Nos.5 to 9 from the abovesaid Crime. In the circumstances, the Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the above remedy. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.6722 of 2010, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 8th March, 2010 lur