c K‘VK)‘ ’J/ SINGLE BENQH (I) EN TH“ "EG €G€JRT GE? W§E€ATURE AT BELASPU£ CHEAT’HSGA’RH \3 ~VPIT Pmmow Ne L-«xnbzaa5 aiiash YadaVS/o Kamaiéev Yadav, Aged about 43 years, D L resendy ¢ wcrking as Secun'i‘y Guard, Oman Caste Mines, Sui) Divisisn, Bishramwr, VT‘l Z n. 3 n10- / r:(umda CGIOny, iehS1i- ourajpur, Digit Surguja, Shhatiisgarh‘ ?ETITEONER VER$U§ Unicn 0f iridia, Thrcugh-Secraary, Mini‘stry of Coal and Mims, New Dglhi, Coa‘i {ridia Ltd, Through its Chairman, Garden Reach Koikatta, Wegt Bgngal. M). Smith EaStam Cami Fields Led, Through its CMG, g Seepa‘é Road Biiaepur, Bi£aspur CG. ;F' / 4. General Manager § uECL \G M) Bismampux, Dibtf Surgua, 1 Chhatiisgar 1. § y ‘e Afea Manager, RESPONDENT§ WRIT PETITIGN UNDER ARTICL 226/227 m? THE &, cemeTiTrqmN 01? {NDIA F03 ISSUANCE OF APPRGPRIAme g 0RDER(S}/DLRECT{0N{§} 1. RARTECULARS OF THE PETITEONER As mentioned in the cause title. K j ‘ XI—HC-22 anésmr mm WW Mawarw 5.4.2005 ‘ Shri Rahul Mishra. counseH Shri R.S, Baghel Add! Centr I Govt. Standing Counse! for Union of india. The petitioner’s case is that n 19.1 1 .1984 he was appointed as Generai Mazdoor in $.E.C.L. Vishvampur, District Sarguja. 1n the year 1986 he was 'promoted as Category-1 and th eafter, the petitioner was transferred to Security Department. Further cas of the petitioner is that respondents are stiti treating the petitioner as tempera ad«hoc empioyee therefore, he is not being promoted and stilt working as Sec rity Guard, whereas other similariy situated persons have been promoted andt ey are working as Head Security Guard. Counsel for the petitione submits that petitioner is entitled for omotions. He further submits that in the facts and’circumstances of the e petitioner may be allowed to make a s representation raising all his grie ances to respondent No.4 and respondent I No.4 be directed to decide his repr sentation in accordance with law. r Having heard learned coun el for the petitioner and having regard to the , the petitioner is ailowed tomake a detailed regularization and consequential facts and circumstances of the cas representation raising ail his grie ances to respondent No.4 within ten days from today and in turn respondent No.4 is directed to decide the representation made by the petitioner within three months from the date of receipt of the same in accordance with law after consi ering relevant records and grievances of the petitioner. With the direction aforesaid. the petition stands disposed of. ln View of this order, LA. No 2471/05 also stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. Sdl— L.C.Bhadoo Judge s \1rvwel‘1/ r