jpc ba1121-11.sxw 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1121 OF 2011 1. Shiva Rangya Pawar 2. Mangla Rangya Pawar ... Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr. Ganesh Gole, for the applicant Mr. K. V. Saste, APP for the State CORAM:- A.M. THIPSAY, J. DATED :- 12th August, 2011. P.C. : 1. Heard Mr. Gole, the learned advocate for the applicant and Mr. Saste, the learned APP for the State. 2. I have gone through the bail application and the annexures thereto. 3. The co-accused in this case have been released on bail. (In Criminal Bail Application Nos. 558/2011, 651/2011, 555/2011, decided on 10th June, 2011 and Criminal Bail Application No. 902 of 2011 decided on 8th July, 2011.) The same reasoning applies to the applicant No.1. No part of the robbed properties is stated to have been recovered at the instance of applicant No.1. 4. As regards the applicant No.2, the entire property is stated to jpc ba1121-11.sxw 2 have been recovered from her. The applicant No.2 is not alleged to have taken actual part in the dacoity. Her husband, who is one of the accused in this case, has already been granted bail. 5. The applicants are in custody since July, 2010. 6. In the circumstances, I am inclined to release the applicants on bail. 7. The application is allowed. 8. The applicants are ordered to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand ) each, with one surety in like amount, or two sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each. (A.M. THIPSAY, J.)