1 wp9352-10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of | coram, appearance, court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders | WRIT PETITION NOS.9352/2010 & 354/2011. Shilpa Subhash Badhe Vs The State of Maha. & Ors. .... Shri A.G.Talhar,Adv.for petr. Smt.A.V.Gondhalekar,AGP for R.1 Shri Mahesh Sonawane,Adv.for R.2. Shri U.S.Malte,Adv.for R.3. .... CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE & A.V.NIRGUDE,JJ. DATE : 16/03/2011. 1] Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2] By Writ Petition No.9352/10, the petitioner is seeking direction to respondent no.2, to decide her representation dated 13/4/2010. We do not wish to examine the prayers in the representation and also the issue whether she is entitled for the reliefs, as prayed in the representation. Learned counsel 2 wp9352-10 for respondent no.2 submits that respondent no.2 will decide the representation within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of this order. 3] Learned counsel for respondent-management submits that their reply to this Petition is ready. We are not taking the reply of the respondent-management on record, and we allow the management to appear before respondent no.2 and file their reply. Respondent no.2 shall decide the representation of the petitioner dated 13/4/10 after giving an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and also to the respondent-management. Respondent no.2 shall take into consideration the reply of the management, while deciding the representation. 4] Respondent no.2 shall also decide the representation dated 29/7/2010 (Writ Petition No.354/11) within a period of 12 weeks after the representation dated 13/4/2010 is decided. While deciding the representation dated 29/7/10, respondent no.2 shall give an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and to the respondent- 3 wp9352-10 management. While passing this order, we shall not be understood to have examined merits of the case. Respondent no.2 shall decide both the representations on merits in accordance with law and uninfluenced by this order. 5] With these observations, Writ Petition are disposed of. (A.V.NIRGUDE,J.) (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) umg/wp9352-10