^u' ^ IN THE HIGH COURT O? CHHATTISGARH AT BILAS.PUR tirit petition No. '^'36 of 2002, PETITIONER RESPONDENTS : Sushil Chhabra, aged 33 years, S,/o pritam Lal Chhabra, resident of Kirti Nagar, Sirg.i.ttl, Tah. & Distt Bilaspur (G.G.). VERS.US .. Satnam Singh, aged 30 years S/o Late Shri Santosh Singh Ktianuja, R/o Tarbahar, Sirgitti, /- Tah. & Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) «*•• ^SKS^ .^s^ t.^^^ ^ ^s'y' 'r^t' ..••"'i -.{!.''••' ^^^•^p- ^.•* ^ ••"" ^. \..^ 2. Ajhar Ali, aged 28 years s/o Mahmood Ali, R/o Nayapara, Sirglttl, Tatl. & D.i.stt. Bilaspur 3. Jogender Singh, aged 27 years S/o unknown R/o Klrti Nagar, Jhoparapara, Sirgltti, Tah. & Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.). 4. Dinesh Kumar Gupta, aged 36 years S/o Late Shri Dauram Gupta, R/o Sirg.i.ttl, Tan. & Distt. Bllaspur. 5. Dinesh Kumar Sahu, aged 28 years, S/o Shr-L Hagan Lal Sahu, R/o Tarbahar Slrgi.tt.i., Tah. & Dlstt. Bilaspur (C.G.). 6. Narottam Shr.i.vas, aged 31 years, S/o Tukaram Stirivas, pv/o Bannak Sirgitti, Tah. & Dlstt. Bllaspur 7. Bharat Lal Mishra, aged 28 years, S/o Shri Shivbalak Misbra, R/o Nayapara Klrtinagar, SArglttl, Tah. & Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.). 8. Manoj Kunar Dubey, aged 22 years, S/o Late Shri Ramphal Dubey, R/o v.i.llage Sirgltt-i., Tah«& Dlstt. Bilaspur (C.G.). '^ 9. Ramawtar Yadav, aged 33 years S/o Bajit Yadav, R/o Kirtinagar, Sirg-i-tti, Tah. & Olstt. Bilaspur. 10. Sunder Singh Thak®, aged 30 years, S/o S'nri Jagafe Singh, R/o Nayapara, Sirgittl, Tah. & Distt. Bilaspur. 11. Returning Gfficer Janpad panchayat, Bilha, Tah. Bilha, Distt. B-i.laspur. '2. State of Chhattlsgarh Through : Collector, B-ilaspur (C.8.) .13. CommJ.ssi.oner, Bilaspur Dlvision, Bilaspur (C.G.). 4. Additional Collector, Bilaspur (C.G.). PETIT.[ON,UNDfiR_ARTICLES 226/227 OF CONSTITHTION OF INDIA <11*(ytl-^*<(cb 24.1.2005 ^~'!SSVSySstss^^^^3^s^^^9SS8^^SS!SS S^i 3S:^i?;5ifi;y^B^&?;.^S^I^S-Si!^^£ffi>::'il '^^ra^,^xtfwre^p((Tt i^; j-Mf...'^^ls^. '•^200 •3ii^^?ichfl( yityt^fl)1 .?^<IRR 'gfei sn^i Sint. Siaita; Ghai, Shri Aditva Joshi, ccj Shri Sumesh. Bajaj, for respondent Nos.12 to Learned counsel fQr I inatter pertai.ns tb Paneh^ new elections have alreai this petition has beGoiite petition is disinissed as h| coitinsel <!M<if<rl<ili ^4flf ^tTs^l -Cf^ft'^'R ^; aifinsii^f • for tjie petitioner. unsel for respondent No. 1, Deguty Governinent Advocate 14. , ' ' .„ /' : !. |he petitiQner subinits that this [yat eleetions of 2000 and iiow ly been conducted, th.erefore, infructuous. Aecordingly, the aving becoine infrucfuous. Sd/- l-C.BHADOO Judse a, :^il 'wa XB \ ,•'• i: :M w li-lii .«