Civil Revision No. 6885 of 2006 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No. 6885 of 2006 (O&M) Date of decision:- 19.10.2011 Paras Ram ....Petitioner Vs. Raj Kumar Jain and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL ****** Present:- Mr. Rohit Ahuja, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vishal Malik, Advocate, for respondent No.1. A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) This petition assails the order dated 09.12.2006 (Annexure P-5) passed by the Additional District Judge, Faridabad, accepting the appeals filed by the defendants- respondents (hereinafter referred as 'the respondents') against the order dated 19.05.2006 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Faridabad, whereby the applications under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC and under Order 38 Rule 5 CPC, were allowed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that respondents have also tried to transfer the property to ELDECO Civil Revision No. 6885 of 2006 (O&M) 2 Projects Pvt. Limited, by creating a third party interest therein. It has been further submitted that the respondents have also executed sale deed of a major part of the property in favour of M/s Standard Brands Limited through its Director Mr. R.K. Aggarwal and he has been made party in the suit vide order dated 03.12.2010 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) Faridabad. Thus, It would be expedient in the interest of justice to direct the parties not to further create any third party interest. As such, this petition is disposed of with a direction that the parties would maintain status quo with regard to alienation during the pendency of the suit. (A.N.JINDAL) October 19, 2011 JUDGE ajp