Crl. Misc. No.M-27801 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-27801 of 2011. Date of decision: September 16, 2011. Manoj Kumar .. Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana. .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI * * * PRESENT Mr.Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate, for the petitioner. * * * M.M.S.BEDI, J (ORAL). The petitioner is alleged to have withdrawn a sum of 27 lacs on the basis of forged cheques from the account of the complainant. Counsel for the petitioner submits that this being third application and the petitioner having been in custody w.e.f., January 2009, he should be released on bail. I have heard the counsel for the petitioner. It has been informed that the entire prosecution evidence has already been produced. Taking into consideration the said circumstance, there is no ground to grant the concession of bail by making a reference to the evidence produced lest it should prejudice the rights ...1 Crl. Misc. No.M-27801 of 2011 of the prosecution agency or the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he will require only one opportunity to produce the entire defence evidence and that the petitioner will be satisfied in case the trial is concluded within a period of two months after the next date of hearing fixed before the trial Court. This petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to raise all the pleas before the Court concerned at opportune time. In case, the trial is not concluded within two months from the next date of hearing, it will be open to the petitioner to approach this Court again. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE September 16, 2011. rka ...2