IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.48556 of 2008 KARU SAH @ CHANDAN SAH … … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … … Opp. Party For the petitioner: Shri Ajay Mukherjee For the State: Shri Dashrath Mehta, APP ----------- 2. 5.12.2008 Heard. There is none named in the F.I.R. of the case which is under Section 302 and other Sections of the Indian Penal Code. The informant gave his fardbeyan on 6.5.2008 and that too did not bear the name of the petitioner. The further statement of the informant was recorded and in that also the petitioner was not named. The name of the petitioner came in paragraph 18 of the case diary through the statement of a witness. The contention is that considering the period of time which could be of many days, if there would have been any knowledge to any person about the complicity of the petitioner his name would have come in any of the statements of the informant. Let the petitioner Karu Sah alias Chandan Saah be released on his furnishing a 2 bond of Rs. 10,000/-( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in Bounsi P.S.Case No. 51 of 2008. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha,J.)