IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.8888 of 2010 Date of Decision : May 14, 2010. Amandeep Kaur and others .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Ms.Alka Chatrath, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners applied for the posts of Sewing Teachers in response to the advertisement issued by the Subordinate Services Selection Board, Punjab. It appears that the candidates selected pursuant thereto were not given appointments as there were reported some gross irregularities in the preparation of the selection list. The Departmental Authorities thereafter appears to have undertaken an exercise to scrutinize the records and re-determine the merit. It is averred by the petitioners that 11 candidates have already been given appointments and they are the next in order of merit. It is also alleged that all the advertised posts have not been filled up. On this premise, the petitioners claim their appointment(s). They have already represented the authorities in this regard vide C.W.P.No .8888 of 2010 2 representation dated 3.3.2010 (Annexure P-15). In these circumstances, however, without expressing any views on the merits of the petitioners claim noticed above, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to take an appropriate decision in the matter and dispose of the petitioners pending claim by passing a speaking order, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. May 14, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE