IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR SATURDAY, THE 15TH DECEMBER 2007 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 Bail Appl..No. 952 of 2007() ---------------------------- CP.67/2006 of J.M.F.C.-II,NEYYATTINKARA .................... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 & 3 ------------------------------------------ 1. KINGSILY, S/O.GAMALIYEL, G.S.BHAVAN, KOLLIYODE, PARASUVAKKAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. GODWIN JOSE @ JOSE, S/O.YESUDAS, KARAKKALA PUTHEN VEEDU, KOLLIYODE, PARASUVAKKAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENTS: STATE AND COMPLAINANT ---------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARASSALA POLICE STATION. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.P.N. SUKUMARAN THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/02/2007, THE COURT ON 15/12/2007 PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Bail Application No. 952 of 2007 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated, this the 15th day of February 2007 ORDER Petitioners who are accused Nos. 1 and 3 in Crime No. 702 of 2004 of Parassala Police Station for offences punishable under Sectiosn 452, 308, 427 and 435 read with Sec. 34 I.P.C., seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application submitting inter alia that an earlier application for anticipatory bail filed as B.A. 3123/05 by the petitioners was disposed of declining to give anticipatory bail and directing the petitioners to surrender before the Magistrate. I see absolutely no reason as to why a second application for anticipatory bail is to be entertained. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) ani.