IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2475 of 2007 VIJAY KUMAR TULSYAN…….Petitioner Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR through Collector, Khagaria 2. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Khagaria 3. The Circle Officer, Khagaria, Bihar 4. Draupadi Devi 5. Nisha Kumari 6. Krishna Kumar 7. Diwani Kumari 8. Simpal Kumari 9. Choti Kumari 10. Ruby Kumari 11. Chandni Kumari ……….. Respondents ******* 06- 15.1.2009 None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned JC to AAG V for respondent nos. 1 to 3, and Mr. Satish Kumar Sinha for respondent nos. 4 to 7. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 7.8.2006 (Annexure 6), passed by the learned Collector of the district of Khagaria, in purported exercise of powers under Section 16 of the Bihar Tenants Holdings (Maintenance of Records) Act 1973, whereby he has allowed the revision application preferred by respondent no.4, has set aside the order of the Anchal Adhikari and the order of the appellate authority, and remitted the matter back to the learned Anchal Adhikari for a fresh decision in accordance with law and the observations made in the impugned order. It appears that the learned revisional authority was dissatisfied with the approach of the learned Anchal Adhikari who had passed the order without local inspection and verification. He also felt dissatisfied with the approach of the learned appellate authority in upholding the order of the learned Anchal Adhikari. In that view of the matter, I do not find fault with - 2 - the impugned order remitting the matter to the first authority. Furthermore, law is well settled that superior courts normally do not interfere with an order of remand. 2. I do not find any merit in this writ petition. It is accordingly dismissed. ( S K Katriar ) mrl