IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 18019 of 2009. [O&M] Date of Decision: 11th October, 2010. Sarmukh Singh Petitioner through Mr. D.K.Bhatti, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents through Mr. K.D.S.Sidhu, DAG, Punjab. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner seeks quashing of the orders dated 07.05.2007 and 07.04.2008 [Annexures P-6 and P-9] passed by the Collector, Jalandhar as well as the order dated 22.07.2009 [Annexure P-12] whereby his appeal has also been dismissed by the Commissioner, Jalandhar Division, Jalandhar and he has been directed to deposit a sum of `1,90,335/- towards additional stamp duty and the registration fee in respect of Sale Deed No. 12861 dated 29.03.2007 got registered in the office of the Sub Registrar, Jalandhar. [2]. The undisputed facts are that the petitioner was allotted plot No. 751, Phase-I, Urban Estate, Jalanadhar by the Punjab Urban Development authority vide allotment letter dated 23.8.1986 for a total sale consideration of Rs.85,000/-. As per the terms and conditions of the allotment letter, the petitioner could pay 75% of the balance sale price in five installments together with interest. The petitioner, after paying the entire sale price applied for registration of the Conveyance Deed and got it registered on 29.03.2007. [3] Vide my separate order of even date rendered in CWP No. 1743 of 2009 [Dhani Chand & Ors. v State of Punjab & Ors.], the same question has been answered against the petitioner. [4] For the reasons mentioned in Dhani Chand's case [supra], this writ petition is also dismissed. October 11, 2010. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE