KBP 1 cra289-10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.289 OF 2010 (Mallikarjun Vs. Jayant) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s order Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr.A.B.Tajane, for applicants. Mr.Srishail Sakhare, for respondent nos.1 to 3. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 16 th November, 2010 P.C. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned counsel for the first to third respondents. 2] Learned counsel for applicants, on instructions of the applicants, states that the applicants are not pressing the Revision Application on merits, but a longer time of three years may be granted to vacate the suit premises. The said request is opposed by learned counsel for the respondents. 3] The applicants are not pressing Revision Application on merits. The applicants are willing to file undertaking to vacate. As the Revision Application is not being pressed on merits, the decree for possession will attain finality. The suit premises are business premises and, therefore, a case is made out for grant of longer time to vacate the premises upto 31 st October, 2012. KBP 2 cra289-10.sxw 4] Hence, Revision Application is disposed of in the following terms:- a) Revision Application is dismissed as withdrawn. b) Notwithstanding the dismissal of the Revision Application, the decree for possession shall not be executed till 31 st October, 2012, subject to the applicants’ furnishing usual undertaking to vacate. The undertaking shall be filed in this court within four weeks from today. c) If undertaking are not filed within four weeks, the decree for possession will forthwith become executable. d) There shall be no order as to the costs. [ A.S. OKA, J.]