1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Revision Application No.94/2007 Kantilal Supada Bodade and 5 others Vs. State of Mah. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM : A.P. LAVANDE, J. DATED : 21st April, 2008. Heard Mr. Mardikar, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Mandpe, learned A. P. P. for the respondent. By this application, the applicants challenge the order dated 4/4/2007 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Buldana in Sessions Trial No. 7/2007 rejecting the application filed by the applicants seeking discharge for offence punishable under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. Charge-sheet under several Sections of the Indian Penal Code including Section 307 of Indian Penal Code has been filed against the applicants. By the impugned order passed disposing of the application filed by the applicants for discharge, the trial Court has held that prima facie offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code is made out against the applicants. 2 Having heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A. P.P., I find no perversity or illegality in the impugned order. The findings given by the trial Court by which the trial Court has held that prima facie an offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code is made out against the applicants cannot be said to be illegal or perverse warranting interference in revisional jurisdiction. Hence, Criminal Revision Application is dismissed. JUDGE Ambulkar