^^ ^v^ ^' HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISiONBEiSiCH Coram : HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J.& HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. PETITIONER WRIT PETITION fCr.l No. 623 of 2009 Vinod Chawda, aged about 51 years, Occupation :- Advocate, S/o. Late Govind Bhai Chawda, R/o. M.1.G. 706, Padmanabhpur, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh RESPONDENTS Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Chief Secretary Government of Chhattisgarh.jD.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. The Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Department of Home (Police), Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. The Secretary, Govemment of Chhattisgah, Department of Food & CivilSupplies Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4. Director General of Police, Government of Chhattisgarh, Police Headquarters, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5. The SuperinteRding of Police, District Durg, Chhattisgarh 6. The . Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Co-operativp Marketing Federation Umited, Raipur(CG) | 7. The Collector, Distriet Durg, Chhattisgarh | 8. Shri Tarachand Sahu, sonofHtra Man Sahu, aged about 62 years, resieiint of Gram hSichandur, Tehsil Gunderdehi, Dj^rict Di|ir^ Chhattisgarh, | MemSer ; cff Parljament; Durg ConstituencY, Distrtot Durg, Chhattisgarh :i ] m 'io5;: 9. Shri Deepak Sahu, S/o. Shri Tarachand Sahu, Aged about 37 years, R/o. Village Kachandur, Tehsil Gunderdehi, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh Shri Ramphal Sharma, aged about (not known to the petitioner), S/o (not known to the petitioner), Proprietor of M/s Shyam Traders, Kuthrail , Durg, Dist Durg, Chhattisgarh 11. Shri Rakesh Sharma, Aged about (not known to the petitioner) S/o. Shri Ramphal Sharma, Proprietor of M/s. Krishna Traders, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Present: Shri RS Marhas and Shri DheerajWankhede, counse! forthe petitioner. Shri Kishore Bhaduri,Additionai Advocate General for the State / respondents No.1 to 5 & 7 O R D E R (26th IVIarch, 2009) The foilowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J.: Learned counsel for the petitioner seek permission to withdraw the writ petition filed by the petitioner with the liberty of availing the other remedies which may be available to the petitioner under the relevant provisions of law for the redressal of the petitioner's grievances projected in the writ petition. 2) Permission granted. 3) With the above liberty, the writ petition is dismissedas withdrawn. padma Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge