IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39084 of 2008 RANJU MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 23.12.2008 Heard. Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 392,395 and 412 of the Penal Code. As per allegation in the F.I.R. the informant was relieved of his belongings at gun point. It further appears that the other vehicles were also looted. First Information Report itself indicates that a mobile phone and other articles have been looted by the culprits. From the record it appears the petitioner was arrested with one mobile (Nokia). The same has been found to be looted article. It has been submitted that petitioner is in custody since 04.04.2008. It has further been submitted that another co-accused, namely, Dinesh Mahto has been released on bail by this court. Having regard to the fact that the looted article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, this court is not inclined to admit the petitioner to bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail stands rejected. However, if the trial of this case is not taken up within seven months from the date of receipt of this order in the court below, the petitioner is granted liberty to renew his payer for bail. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)