THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.7795 of 2011 ORDER: In this writ petition, petitioner seeks a mandamus declaring the action of the first respondent – Inspector of Police, L.B.Nagar Police Station, Ranga Reddy District, in interfering with the civil disputes and forcing him to vacate premises bearing No.11-21-1944, admeasuring 80 sq.yards, situated at NTR Nagar, L.B.Nagar Municipality, Saroornagar Revenue Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as illegal and arbitrary. It is the case of the petitioner that he is a petty businessman and is a resident of H.No.11-2-1944, NTR Nagar, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. It is his grievance that though he is the absolute owner and possessor of aforesaid house, respondents 4 and 5 are trying to interfere with his possession and at their instance, respondents 1 to 3 - police are trying to interfere with his life and liberty and insisting him to vacate the said premises. Based on the written instructions sent by the Station House Officer, L.B.Nagar Police Station, Cyberabad, it is submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents 1 to 3 that there is a complaint against the petitioner and others by the daughter of the fourth respondent on 19.03.2011 stating that on the aforesaid date, the petitioner and his brother, by name, Venkatesh, have beaten her, her mother and sister and requested to take action. Based on such complaint, a case in Crime No.421 of 2011 was registered under Sections 448, 324, 506 IPC on 19.03.2011 and the petitioner, who is A.1, and A.3 were arrested on 21.03.2011 and A.2 and A.4 are absconding. It is also submitted that the police did not interfere with the civil disputes and did not insist the petitioner to vacate the premises in question and that when the steps were taken to investigate into the said crime, the petitioner filed this writ petition. It is to be noticed that the complaint was lodged on 19.03.2011 and the petitioner, who is A.1, was arrested on 21.03.2011, whereas this writ petition was filed on 23.03.2011. When a criminal complaint is lodged before them, it is the duty of the police to investigate and file final report. Such investigation cannot be termed as interference. As it is stated that respondents 1 to 3 are not interfering with the possession of the petitioner and did not insist him to vacate the premises in question but they are only investigating into Crime No.421 of 2011, I do not find any merit in this writ petition for issuance of directions as prayed for. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 1st APRIL, 2011. kvni