IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR APPEAL SUIT No.1162 of 2003 & APPEAL SUIT MISCELLANEOUS PETITION.No.543 of 2010 BETWEEN Smt. Samayanthula Udaya Lakshmi and three others. ... APPELLANTS AND Maddula Naga Siromani. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellants: MR. AMBADIPUDI SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent: MR. V.V.L.N. SARMA The Court made the following order: COMMON JUDGMENT: ASMP.No.543 of 2010 is an application to record compromise in terms of the joint compromise memo duly singed by all the parties to the appeal and their respective counsel. 2. Heard both sides. 3. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that in terms of the compromise no further amounts are payable by the respondent to the appellants with regard to the execution of sale deed to the extent of 400 sq. yards of the plaint schedule property i.e. Northern half portion as agreed to between the parties. 4. All the four appellants and respondent are present in the Court and they confirm the terms and conditions of the compromise as recorded in the joint compromise memo. I am, therefore, satisfied that the compromise is lawful and can be recorded. 5. ASMP is accordingly ordered. In view of the above, the appeal suit is accordingly allowed to the extent of 400 sq. yards i.e. Southern half portion of the plaint schedule property and stands dismissed to the extent of 400 sq. yards i.e. Northern half portion of the plaint schedule property. Office to draft a decree in terms of the joint compromise memo. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J March 23, 2010 DSK