IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3020 of 2011 PURNESHWAR PRASAD SINGH & ANR . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2. 01.03.2011 The present order has been passed with the consent of the counsel for the parties. On the own showing of the petitioner the order stopping further construction pending disposal of the Vigilance case draws sustenance from the statutory power granted to the Municipal Commissioner under Section 139 (3) of the Bihar Municipal Act, 2007. The petitioner has adequate remedy to seek vacating of the same under the provisions before the Municipal Commissioner. Counsel for the Municipality submits that the Vigilance case itself may be directed to be disposed off expeditiously provided the petitioner himself co-operates. Subject to adequate co-operation from the petitioner, let the Municipal Commissioner endeavour to dispose off the Vigilance Case No. 08B of 2010, stated to be pending before him after hearing all concerned within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt and/or 2 presentation of a copy of the present order, without granting unnecessary adjournment to either parties. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)