IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19184 of 2009 1. GANGA DAYAL SINGH 2. Indrashan Singh 3. Birendra Singh 4. Satya Narayan Singh 5. Bachan Singh 6. Vikash Kumar Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 09.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that parties are sharers having differences for their shares. Allegation under Section 379 of I.P.C. is super addition, while under Section 326 of I.P.C. is not believable as the complaint was lodged after one month from the alleged date of incident. So, there could be no probability of verifying injuries leading to offence under Section 326 of I.P.C. even then they are apprehending their arrest. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 841 of 2007, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Rohtas at Sasaram subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)