IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.229 of 2008 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna 2. The Under Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3. The Special Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 4. The District Magistrate, Lakhisarai 5. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Lakhisarai Versus RADHEY SHYAM PASWAN, son of Late Kailu Paswan, resident of village Nehga Shahpur, P.S. Chheria Shahpur, District Begusarai, then B.D.O., Halsi Block, District Lakhisarai ad at present C.O. Kumarkhand Block, District Madhepura ----------- 04/ 01.04.2009 Heard. Petitioners, namely, the State of Bihar and its officers have sought review of the order dated 1.7.2008, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 6357 of 2008, which was passed after hearing the State counsel, but without the benefit of the counter affidavit, although under orders dated 22.4.2008 four weeks’ time was allowed to file counter affidavit with direction to list the case after summer vacation. For the reasons best known to the State counsel, counter affidavit was not filed and the writ application was disposed of on the basis of the oral submission made on behalf of the parties and as the writ petitioner, opposite party herein was not served with any charge memo and languished under suspension for over a year, his suspension was revoked with observation that the proceeding initiated shall continue. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to entertain this review application, which is, accordingly, rejected with costs, 2 which is assessed at Rs. 5,000/- (Rs. Five thousand) to be deposited by petitioner no.1, the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna, in the office of this Court within one month. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)