IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.5518 of 2005 Between: Potluri Sunitha … Petitioner AND The District Collector, Khammam & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri Palivela Satyaraja Babu Counsel for the respondents : GP for Revenue This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.5518 of 2005 ORDER:- At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed apprehending dispossession of the petitioner from the land, which was assigned to her in the year 2003. This Court, while admitting the writ petition, granted interim direction to the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the land in question. In the counter-affidavit filed by the Tahsildar, Manugur Mandal, Khammam District along with the vacate stay application, it is averred that the petitioner has violated the assignment conditions and that the respondents are contemplating to take steps to cancel the assignment for such violation. It is further averred that so far neither a notice was issued nor the respondents interfered with the possession of the petitioner. In view of the abovementioned stand taken by the respondents, the writ petition is disposed of. While giving opportunity to the respondents to take action in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law, they are directed not to dispossess the petitioner till such a procedure is followed. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, WPMP.Nos.7326 and 28158 of 2005 and WVMP.No.1455 of 2008 are disposed of as infructuous. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 11.06.2008 ES