IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. F.A.O. No.1624 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 1.2.2010 Surajmal Malik ....Appellant Versus Satpal and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. Pankaj Mehta, Advocate for the appellant. RAJESH BINDAL, J **** Challenge in the present appeal is to the award of learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Hisar, where on account of damage to the Tractor owned by the appellant, a sum of Rs. 90,000/- has been awarded as compensation. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the appellant had produced on record bills for repair of Rs. 1,10,000/-. However, still the Tribunal has only awarded Rs. 90,000/- as compensation. It is not in dispute that the Tractor was of 1996 Model. When the accident took place it was 11/12 years old. Total value of the Tractor as on the date of accident was merely Rs. 1,70,000/-. Considering above facts and also that the bills were merely for Rs. 1,10,000/- and Rs. 90,000/- has already been awarded by the Tribunal, I do not find any case for further enhancement of compensation can be made out. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. As there is no merit in the appeal, the application for condonation of delay is also dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) 1.2.2010 JUDGE Reema