IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11205 of 2002 NATHUNI MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 05 4.3.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner came to this Court against the apprehended termination of his service when during the pendency of this writ application his services have been terminated on 26.12.2002 after a show-cause notice, the order of termination being appended to the second supplementary affidavit. The claim of the petitioner is of an appointment as a Chainman, by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, stated to have been vested with powers to make appointment. This entire issue, as also certain orders of this Court on the aspect, has been considered in detail by an order of this Court dated 13.8.2008 in C.W.J.C. No. 287 of 2001 and analogous cases. The judgment by the Division Bench in L.P.A. No. 270 of 2000 sought to be relied upon by the petitioner has also been considered therein and distinguished. On challenge in L.P.A. No. 56 of 2009 the order of this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 287 of 2001 - 2 - inclusive of the distinction made on the applicability of the order in L.P.A. No. 270 of 2000 stood affirmed when the L.P.A. was withdrawn on 28.2.2009 to enable the petitioners to approach the committee concerned for redressal of their grievances. Learned counsel for the petitioner then moulds his submission to pray that the writ application may now be disposed in similar terms as in L.P.A. No. 56 of 2009. The order of the L.P.A. Court is quoted below:- “Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants prays for withdrawal of this appeal with liberty to the appellants to approach the committee for redressal of their grievances. A.C. to learned S.C.21 appears on behalf of the State. This appeal is permitted to be withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.” In that view, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for leave to withdraw the writ application. The writ petition is permitted to withdrawn in terms of the order of the Division Bench. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)