THE HON'BLE SMT.JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI C.R.P. NO :3147 of 2010 Date: 30.7.2010 Between: Mohd. Yousuf ….Petitioner And Osman Bin Mohammed Balahwal and others. …Respondents THE HON'BLE SMT.JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI C.R.P. NO :3147 of 2010 Order: This revision petition is directed against the order dated 11.6.2010 in I.A. No.1480 of 2010 in O.S. No.1732 of 2008 on the file of the I Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The petitioner herein is the 1st defendant and respondents 2 and 3 are the defendants 2 and 3 in the suit. The 1st respondent is the plaintiff, who filed the aforementioned suit for eviction and delivery of possession, for recovery of arrears of rents and future mesne profits. In that suit, the 1st respondent filed I.A. no.1480 of 2009 under order 15-A read with Section 151 of C.P.C. praying to deposit the arrears of rents. In the affidavit filed in support of the I.A., the 1st respondent has averred that the defendants have not been paying the rent from October, 2006 to July, 2008 amounting to Rs.2,26,000/- and a further amount of Rs.1,33,900/- is due also on account of damages for use and occupation of the premises in question. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, the trial Court, by the order impugned in this revision, allowed the said I.A. and directed the petitioner and the respondents 2 and 3 to deposit rent at Rs.10,300/- per month from August, 2008 till May, 2010 to the credit of the aforementioned suit within a period of twenty five days. It also directed them to deposit the monthly rent at Rs. 10,300/- from June, 2010 to the credit of the suit on or before 10th of every month till the disposal of the suit. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner-1st defendant filed the present revision. Sri Murali Narayan Bung, learned counsel for the petitioner contended that even though the admitted monthly rent is Rs. 8,500/-, the trial Court erred in directing the petitioner to deposit the arrears of rent and the monthly rent @ Rs. 10,300/- per month. He further stated that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay the admitted rent @ Rs.8500/- per month and also the arrears within six weeks from today. He, therefore, requested the court to grant some time to him to pay the same. In view of the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to modify the impugned order with a direction to the revision petitioner to deposit the arrears of rent from August, 2008 till date at of Rs.8,500/- per month, which is the admitted rent, within a period of six weeks from today. He shall continue to deposit the monthly rent at Rs.8500/- per month to the credit of the suit till the disposal of the suit. On such deposit, the 1st respondent is entitled to withdraw the same. In so far as the contention with regard to disputed amount of rent is concerned, both the parties are at liberty to raise the same in the pending suit. In view of the fact that the suit is of the year 2008 the trial Court is directed to dispose of the main suit within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Subject to the above modification, the revision petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ T.MEENA KUMARI,J Date: 30th July, 2010 pnb