IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.3720 of 2011 Date of Decision: March 03, 2011 Kamikar Singh .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS Financial Commissioner (Revenue), Punjab & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. K.S. Chahal, Advocate, for the petitioner. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This civil writ petition has been filed praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari, quashing Order dated 21.8.2009 (Annexure P-5) passed by the District Collector, Ludhiana; Order dated 27.7.2010 (Annexure P-6) passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Patiala Division, Patiala; and order dated 30.11.2010 (Annexure P-7) passed by the Financial Commissioner (Revenue), Punjab. 2. Vide Order Annexure P-5 it has been CWP No.3720 of 2011 [2] directed that the case is remanded to Sub Divisional Magistrate, Payal, with direction that that fresh mushtri Munadi be conducted and fresh applications be received and thereafter the name of suitable candidate be recommended for appointment of Lambardar. The order has been upheld by the Divisional Commissioner in appellate jurisdiction vide Order Annexure P-6, as also by the Financial Commissioner in revisional jurisdiction vide Order Annexure P-7. Other than the above, the District Collector has been asked to decide the case within two months positively from the date of receipt of the order (Annexure P-6). 3. Learned counsel contends that proper Munadi had been conducted and therefore, the findings are not warranted in facts. 4. I have considered the contention of learned counsel. 5. It is the objective consideration of the Revenue Officers that is required to be seen. Rights of the petitioner are not adversely effected, in so much as the respondent has not been appointed. It is not in dispute that the petitioner can contest for appointment as Lambardar. 6. In view of the above, I do not find CWP No.3720 of 2011 [3] any reason to interfere in extraordinary civil writ jurisdiction. 7. The petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) March 03, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?