1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4234 OF 2008. Bandhu Grih Nirman Sahakari sanstha -: versus :- Bholanath Jagguji Rangari Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JUNE 28, 2010. Shri P.A. Abhyankar, learned counsel for petitioner and Shri H.B. Gaikwad, learned counsel for respondent. Parties have placed Compromise Petition jointly signed by them and requests that it should be recorded. Shri Sanjay Hulke for petitioner no. 1 Society; Smt. Daljit Kaur – petitioner no.2 and Shri Bholanath Rangari – respondent are personally present before this Court. They are identified by their respective Counsel. Compromise petition is signed by all above three persons on all its three pages. It also bears signature of their respective counsel. Learned Counsel states that contents of Compromise Petition are drawn as per the instructions of parties and same are explained to them. 2 Shri Bholanath Rangari – respondent accepts the compromise and he states that he is withdrawing Appeal No.31/2008 before the Appellate Court at Nagpur. He is disputant in Cooperative Dispute No.1265/2003 and after its dismissal by the Cooperative Court, he has preferred the said appeal. I am therefore, satisfied that parties have compromised the dispute between them as stated in the Compromise Petition. Compromise Petition is therefore read and recorded. The dispute between the parties is disposed of in terms of the Compromise Petition. Rule accordingly. No costs. JUDGE Rgd.