1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5499 OF 2009 (Farooqui Aleema Feroz s/o Abdul Rasheed vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. NOVEMBER 25, 2011. Shri Wathore, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Thakare, learned AGP for respondents No. 1, 2 & 3 and Shri Puri, learned counsel for Respondent No. 7. Shri Puri, learned counsel raises preliminary objection. He points out that the prayer made in the petition is contrary to advertisement. He points out that in advertisement, reserved post is for Marathi medium while the petitioner is seeking appointment against the post in Urdu medium course. He also claims to be a physically handicapped candidates though the advertisement did not prescribe any such reservation. He has invited attention to reply filed by Respondent No. 7 in which it is disclosed that he was selected and appointed in response to subsequent advertisement and has nothing to do with the challenge in present 2 petition. Shri Wathore, learned counsel states that Respondent No. 7 has been added because of its disclosure in the reply filed by Respondent No. 6 – employer. He seeks leave to withdraw present petition with liberty to approach again if cause of action subsists. Accordingly writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.