IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.989 of 2008 CHITRANJAN KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 28.7.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is an accused for the offences under sections 420, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that on perusal of the F.I.R., it would appear that the petitioner, who was Panchayat Sewak, is alleged to have deviated from the laid down instructions of the Government for selection of the candidates on the posts of Shiksha Mitra. Instead of selecting the candidates from the marks obtained in the matriculation examination, the petitioner, who was the member of the Sukh Suvidh Committee, deviated from the instructions and conducted the written examination for selecting the candidates. Later, the selection having been found not in accordance with the provisions of Governmental instructions was cancelled. It is, however, 2 submitted that on the basis of the allegation attributed against him, no criminal liability is attracted. Considering the submissions as noticed above, and the materials brought on the record, it is directed that the petitioner Chitranjan Kumar, in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No.425 of 2007, within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M., Hilsa, Nalanda, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)