WPSS No. 5816 of 2001 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J Recall Application no. 546 of 2008 Delay Condonation Application No. 2905 of 2008 Sri C.K. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri H.M. Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand and Sri Subhash Upadhyay, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 are present. Reasons stated in the delay condonation application in filing the recall application are satisfactory. Accordingly, delay in filing the recall application is condoned. Delay Condonation Application is allowed. I am satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of Recall Application. Recall Application is allowed. Order dated 13.12.2007 passed by this Court is hereby recalled. Learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 has submitted that petitioner has already been terminated from the service. In view of the above statement, writ petition has become infructuous as petitioner has already been terminated and suspension order of the petitioner has come to an end. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, liberty is given to the petitioner that if any grievance still survives, he may approach the proper forum for redressal of the same. (P.C. Verma, J) 22.05.2008 SKS