IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.47079 of 2008 SATRUGHAN MAHTO … … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … … Opp. Party For the petitioner: Shri Ajit Kr. No.1 For the State: Shri Dashrath Mehta, APP ----------- 2. 21.11.2008 Heard. Earlier prayer of the similar nature was dismissed by an order dated 23.5.2008. The petitioner has again come up with a fresh prayer of similar nature on the ground that the trial court has not concluded the trial within a period of one year since the petitioner is in custody. It is too well known to be noted down in the order that pendency is the main problem before the courts including this Court. It is yet another truth for the judiciary that the number of pendency is dwindling over the years. Besides, there could be a huge number of cases in very Judgeship of the nature in which the petitioner is praying for bail and in which the persons could be in custody. It was simply for that reason that the petitioner has come up before this Court 2 with fresh prayer for bail. The filing of the fresh petition by the petition is hereby shut out and any petition for bail filed by the petitioner shall not be entertained by this Court. The trail court shall conclude the trial according to its own time. The petition is dismissed. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)