1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 705 OF 2011 *** 1. Heard Advocate Shri Zarekar for the Petitioner who wanted to be impleaded as party in pending appeal. His proposed vendor was already respondent in that appeal. He has expired. Advocate Mr. Zarekar states that petitioner had/ has agreement for sale with said deceased and already a suit for its specific performance has been filed which is pending. 2. The Appellate Court has in impugned order dated 21st October, 2010 considered the facts. It has found that merely on the strength of agreement such application could not have been granted. I do not find any jurisdictional error or perversity. Petition is, therefore, rejected. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:31/01/2011. ans/705