IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 37169 of 2010 Date of decision: 29.03.2011 Mrs. Bala Devi and another ........ Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. H S Jaswal, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Amit Rana, DAG, Haryana for the respondent - State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for issuance of necessary direction to respondent No. 2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of petitioners at the hands of respondent Nos. 4 to 8. Mr. Amit Rana, DAG, Haryana, on instructions of HC Jai Chand, states that the statements of the petitioners have been recorded, stating therein, that there is no threat to their life and liberty in any manner. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. However, in case, the petitioners still feel threaten, they are at liberty to approach respondent No. 2, who shall look into the same and take necessary measures, if need be. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 29.03.2011 mohan