IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16703 of 2010 MOBINA KHATOON W/O LATE MD. YATIM, R/O VILL- DHARMAPUR, WARD NO.1, DISTT- SAMASTIPUR, BIHAR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SAMASTIPUR. 3. THE CHAIRMAN, MANICIPALITY (NAGAR PARISAD),SAMASTIPUR. 4. THE CIRCLE OFFICER, SAMASTIPUR. 5. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NAGAR PARISAD, SAMASTIPUR. ----------- 2 04.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Durga Nand Jha, learned counsel for the respondent-Corporation as also the learned counsel for the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon the death of her husband in harness on 21st of April 2007 while working on the post of Jamadar under the respondent Corporation, the death-cum-retiral dues as indicated in paragraph 7 have remained to be settled and paid despite representation, as contained in Annexure-7. Learned counsel for the respondent- Corporations submits that the representation of the petitioner indicating the claims is not clear to settle the pending claims. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for 2 expeditious disposal of the pending claims, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the respondent no. 5. In case such representation is filed stating the details of the unpaid claims as also copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of her claims along with the certified copy of present order, the grievance of the petitioner be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, `so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid with interest permissible under the relevant rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. AMRENDRA/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)