97 IllE l t 1U111Ol llINJAB AND HARYANA AT Cl lANDIGARH 4 lOate111IOeciSlOlllMarchl 2011 11 IPA No730 of2009 ShashiKltinar andcltllcrs lppellants VersllS FinancialClommissioilt7r I laryanaand others espondents 21 LPA Noe731of2009 ShashiKuinar and 0111ers eelppellallts VerSllS FinancialCotnmissioller I1aryana tItldothers espoildents 31 1PA Noe732of2009 Shashi ALlmar lppellanl Versu Financial Colninissionel Hllryililtlalld others espondent 41 1PA No733 of2009 Shashi Kunlar and othets lppcllants VersliS Financial Commissioner Ilaryantl others Respondenls 5J 1PA VtI734 of 2009 Shashi Kunlar and otheIs eAppellallts VerSllS 1 Financial Commissioner I lEiryltilailllll tllhers espondclllS KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 98 61 1A NtIe73517f21109 9 1 hashi Kumar and others Ippellants 1IUS Financial Commissloner Haryaiiiiantl clthers Respondents 71 t WP Noe10684of2001 Surtaetc 0etitioners Vei sllS Statcof Harvanaandothcrs J 8 4 WP No15051 of2001 BangiRanl and another etitioners 1 rI SlIS Stateof Harvanaand others 691 1 WP No18577 of2001 ShashiKulnar andothers Petitioners Vrrsus Stateof Ilarvana andothers esponclents 10J lWP No12353 0f1991 Om Parkashandothers e Petitioncrs IoerslIS StateofHarvanaand others 111 RSA No747 0f2009 Nathi Rain and another Appcllanl IlersllS ShashiKumar Respondent KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 51 99 l21 RSA N0e2748of 2009 4 Is 1urtaand others lppellant Versus Chhaviand others 131 RSA NrI749 of 2009 Dauli lppellant Versus ShashiKumar espondent 149 RSA Noe2750of 2009 Mam Chand andothers Appellant Versus Divya espondenl 151 RSA Nol755 of 2009 Doii Appellallt Vel9113 Pardeep Kumar andothers Respondents 161 ItSA N2756 tlf2009 Nathi Ram and another ippellants Verws PardeepKumar and others espondents 017J IISA No2757 of2009 Sauni Devi Appellailt Vrsus PardeepKumar and others Respondents KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 r 400 181 RSA N027814of20119 4 0 Ulta lppellants VersuS Pardeep Komar and others 199 RSA No2759 tIf 2009 SohanLal and others lppellants Versus Pardeep Kumar andothers 201 RSA NtIe27611 r1f21109 I6eshni Devi and others Versus Pardeep Kumar and others 211 RSA Nrie27611f20119 V Puran Versus Pardeep Kumar and others 6221 RSA N12762 tIf211119 Maln Chand and others Appellant VerS1l5 PardeepKumar and otllers espondents CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTE HEMANT GUPTA HONBLE MR JUSrlCE GURllEV SlNGH 1 Whether Reportersoflocal paper Illllyhe allllwed to sec the judgmellt 2 To be referred to the RepotterS 1Il no17 11 3 Whethcr thejudgment shoulcl IoeiepI1rtetl Itl the Digest2 KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document r r 401 MJsR1Bawa Riiililhir Ilawa SamuelGill and ricsent 4 ShashiGupta Advota1esfor the in LPA Nos730 10 7 15of20119 lVlr AKChopra Sl AdlCille Illll Mr HarminderSiiigllAtlvtlcate Ioi thepetitioners 200 MlsLNNerma anclKiran Pal SinghAdvocates forthe itI All No10684 of2001 Ms forlhe Stat Mr BhagSinghAtIltlcate forthe 111IISA Nos747 to 2750 and2755 to 2762 of2009 HEMANT GUPTA J This order shall disIltIseof aforeinentioned22 cases arisingout of surplusland casc 111t Illl larkush since deceasedl All other cases exceptCWl Nos 10684 i111119051of of 2001 atld CWP No 185772001 pertain to llita of mutationcithcr on account of purchase of land Is tclltillls perlnissible area or thc 1 settine aside ofthe said orders Iletllreewrit petitionsinentioned J above are the cases in which the i Isucs rcgarding surplusIand01 1 Oln Parkashis to be exalnined Leamed counsel for IlIts IItlies agree that decision Ill the said three writ petitionswtlultl IlOverll the remaining cases as well atld such cases can be disloscilolin ternls ofthe decision Ill the aforesaid writ petiticons CWP Nos10684 of211111und 15051 of2001 are bv some 0thetenantswho areclaimin rightto purchaseland as thc tenant s permissible area of big IItlltlIIVller 1111Parkash The petitiotlerstherein have challengetlIlle cIrders tliited 29Ot 1997 KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document L 402 by Ihc Collector 999 8c 24032000 Oommissioner andthe Financial CllllillllSSitlller CWP of 2007 is filed by thc Icgiilheirs f deceased Om Parkash the aforesaid rdcrs which are also lnatter ofchallenge in t0heafcresllilltwo Ivril Iletittons The facts are llltil Oin ParktIsh big Ianc owner was land in different villagesnamelyJagadhri Mandebr SughGaloli Dasani and Famtkhllir l lc submlttcdhls selectlon i n ForrnEin accordancewitll Rulc l161ofthe Punjab of Land TenuresRules 1956I Illr short tlIc Rulesl and sent the said fonn under 1ll lSt tlil 19161958 to lhc Collector Ambala It was bo IIIin ill earlier Ivrit petitioll 6CWP No873 of 19879 that forins wcrc setlt to lhe Colleclor lol thereason that no SpecialCollector was lill the exloiiy of six lnonths After the said selection tlle ollcctor passed an ordcr on0907 960 The saidorder readsas utider Present land owner lvitlI counseI Accurding to Fortll D the land owner owned 14Il SA 7 118 units of laild 1111 1504953 andhe owns 120SA II112unitsat preser Addino area 1 SA 1118 units in villageMuntlcbriantl5 SA 912 units Ill Farrakhpur ownedhytlle 1Iuitltlwller 011 1504 953 which hasbeen sold tlte ItIl nreawltli the Iand owner comes to 127 SA 1118unlts I ltIl 111this thellIllowing iirea l under tenants as shown in tlItI Ilortll 19 relalingto the Iand owner Jagadhri lSA Ll112 ullllS Mandebri 62 Sll It 112lltllls Sugh ISA 5 112uIlllS Galoli 36SA 2114 uuilS Dasani 2SA 11114 Iits Farrakhpur 5SA 9a112unIts 119SA I 4 Utlits KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 7 e e9 403 InaddiIltiIi unilsoi 11uld are underorchardin Villago Mandebri Dedllctlllgarea underthe tenants andthe orchard 4 S r thearea remilitIedttlith tlle Ialld owner is less than his 4pW areiI Tllcrc istllerefore no surplus wea with the laildeowneri Iit case IleIllel Announcedl0i111719611 Sdl 12 ColleclorJagadhri In the said ordtr Ill SLirplus areawas found with thc landowner as aRer lie tcnaills area and the area of orchard the landtiilll llle lorowner was found to be Iess than the area tlllcl tllesaidorder was passed soine of the tenants filed Iot Ilurcllliseofland under Section 18 ofthe PunabSecuritytlf l iIIld eilures Acl 1953 or sholt thc Act 1 he leamed Asslst iinl CrIlleclor vidc its order datcd 29Ol l 969 disposed of thc as the area soughtto be by some of the tciIonls Ivus within the reservedarea of the Om Parkash ln the siiid order by the tenanls the IearnedClollectorremantletitlle clIses trI the Assistant Collectclr to examlne the questiontllnl wIletIlerthe tenants are Iiable to purchasc land ifthe reservalilIiiistIIlllnae to Iaw aild Whethet such land bclongstl l llle perIllissiblearea of the Iand owner The Collector passed iiii ordcr on 231 21969 that the Iand owner has sent his selection lilnli tvith tlie Fonn A and C co tlle Collector in the year 1958 Illil llle Iiilitluwner has sold Iand Ill Village13lnat Tehsll Thant75111I Jislt icl lrarnal Therelre tllis case was to be decided by Slltlciill olleetor It waS ltlCUlllbent UPOll landowner to selld hi Itlrnls to S1oecialCollector lllldcr Scction 5A and 5B of theAct i1111ulldeI Rtiles 3 and 40f the Rulcs and the forlns have beell Seill IVrtlllgl lllcrcfore no actioil IS KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document C8 r 404 4uired on those forms In the agailist lhe said order thc Il leanedCornmissioner on 15A 1970directed the paniesto appear 5a beforethe SpecialCollectorfol redccisillri After the saidorder the learned SpecialCol lector lisscd 1111order on 12091 972 14standard acres as llle Iiiild surpllisIn the handsof big landeowner The appeal Ilte said order was dismissedbv Coinlnissioner on 221973 Ilut lhe Iearned Financial Colnmissionervide its order dalrtl l 81 21974 returnedthe matlcr to the SpecialCollector after tippealof the landowner The IearnedFinancial CommissirIIlcrtlirectedtlIeSpecialCollectol to Iook into threepolntsdelineateilbyhim iIl llle said order The purchaserof land measuring1J4 Kliiiiils 141Marlas situaled Ill VillageBinat fromlandowner61edil writ Iletilionbeforethis coutl CWP 6859 of 19741This courl 9et aside tIle order of Special Collecturon 13 1978 Stl 115to dccide the claim of tlle purchseras well The Specialt Jllecloi thereafterreietenninccl the surpluscase of the Om Parkilsll 131106JH 979 The appeal was dismissed on 21Ol1981 he Finiilciol CommissionCr clismissedthe revision Oll 221014746 hc order passedbv lhe Financial Commissionerwas challeliled beforc tllis Court in CWl No873 of 1987by Onl Parkash 1111Court rettiittedthe matter lo the Finincial Commissionerfor reatltIcisitliIi11tIccordancewith IawI and in the Iightof observationsmitllr llIcrein llS llle order passcd by the Financial Coininlssioner IS f7nlnd to be withoul 8111 reasons The leamed Financial l Illllllisslcliler acccpted thc reVlSlOil On 1609 1995 The releviiiil extract Itrlill lhe said order reads as uoder KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document C9 r r 405 5 The secondpoiiititt wllicll I Oild it Iot of nlerit is tlle that il is dlltiil Ille Iltircllase of tllc tenant that thc surjll us ureacase 01 the Iand owner l4a5 lP lo be opencd I hi5 IS a IIer dtlubtful lu inylnind Even ifit wiis Ill be openedit could not havebeen 7 donewithouttheapprovijl tlf IllehigheriiuthorityAdmittedll noapproval hasbeenolltiuncdwhilereviewing thesurplus area case of the IandlordwolIirhIliid ittqttiretl flnalityon 97 196tl The written arguinentssillllllilteclby the do ilclt seemlo catTV 111UCh 0011111I Itlll l 1111Ilrinlv of theview that011 thesetwo coilllts allltlc Illc evii1111Ilelitionshouldsucceed The ordersdated 6 8 47 and 201J11981 of thc Assislonl Collector and theCtlnlllll9SltlllerlllO sel aside I remandthe case back tt 11 Spccial lector Rlr de 110141 deterIninationbv issuinpiiillices ttl hoth lhe parties The presentround01liligationis basedupontheorder passedby the SpecialCollecttIr til 2909997 aer the aforesaid order f the Financial Conlmisi1IlIer lle Iearned SpeciaI Colleclor held to thc followineellcol l ain fully in agrceilltItltwilh tlIe Iearncd counsel lor landowner Theordcr11111d 16J9l 995 is verymuchclear lll orderdated09071960 area case ofthe landowner1Ai15 decidedandheld thatIltlil al ea tIf theIitndownerIvas 12751 1 1118units Outoflhis IlltIftillclwilig 211as was undertenai1l51 Village Arcll 54 lJnits Jagadhri 4114 Mandebri Il 12174 Sugh 5 1r12 Galoli 1 2 114 Dasani 1 11 114 Farrakhptlr 7 9e112 119 14 ln additionto 61ii111s tlf latldas liilder orchard in villiioc Madabri reducingarea Ulldet lhe ttlrlills and Ihe orcbard llle arca with the iaiild4 tlel reIlliiitls Iess than Ilis pcrmissille area 1110reaflerdUritlgIlurcllttseproceedings It was dctected that the landowneralsil IIllds Intltlin l illitgeMandi and Binl f11n8 ill Otherdistriclf l he psititt regarding thesc lll tl villagesis as underl KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document r 406 Village Area 1teIlIHr1s SA llllll 4 Mandi 1 Il 1utchasedby tenanls undcr 9eclion 18ofthe Act P SA Unit 13ii1t 47 15 114 1Iiiderold lenant 30 14e174 soldupto30738 8 133 4 Ilanjar 6 3a314 47 152114 In thelillllltl Ihe allIve discussionseven if areas 01 other two villagr 11 Ctllllltediil lhe total holdingsof the Iandownertlle lltlltltlll re111111115 thesame ie with No Surpltis Area ThereforeIIfleroIIowing 30 SA of area as jerhls choicc Ilie reillilining area is declared as te11t1t115 arei l otder The order by the SpecialCollector was afflrmed lll appeal Oll 12 Illl199 bv llle leamed Commissioncr The learned Comlnissionetftlliild that two pointsremain lo be decided Firstlythe 1Ifforili F and SecondlywlhatlS the effect of death of latldtllvilcr It I7Itiildthat the inerits 01 thc case are not afYectedby Iltll prcparing ll orin F and that no such plea has been raised t Ii1 belliilf 01 the Iandowner that the calclilallolls made are inelli Iecl ill illly manner Itl respectof the ofdeath ofllitl llilldolvller cln 19071992 the Ieamcd Colnlnissioner found that Il heirs clf the Iandownerfrom 1992till 1997had not moved any before the SpecialCollecttor 00r took any other i igs to otaiil the bene6t of reopcnlng of the case of surplus IlerifcIre Ile Iegalheirs of the Iandowner had no rightto make such clililll Ill 811 appealforthe rst tlllle lil respectof pleaofthe tellIIIIlS Ill tlle appealthat the order datcd 09117 960 is a nullity Il IOlllld lllat tlle I4ighCourt and the Financial Commissionel hiive Ilelclthis trder to be valid and that the rightsof the tenants are IIot allected as the tenants perinissiblc KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Il 407 vouldremain intacl Ihe Commissionerhas ai 4 the revlslOll in lllllllle tlll 24032000 Ie The legal heir 111lhcIiildoivilerin their writ petition No18577of2001 have Stllllltsctltlg aslde of the orders dated 1201999and It is specificpleaded casc 29091997 ofthe leeal heirs of the Iancltlvncithiil the order dated09071960 has attained and colilil 11111 Ile specially in the initiiIletIIlv the Ienants The relevanl averments 111 13oflllc Ivrit readas under al Because Ihe tliilct diiled 1u11 9 1960 Annexure l l attailledthe IliIilityctluld Iitlt be reoened especiallI inthepurchase ptotilingsitlitiilledbythe tenants bl BecaLlse resllllildent NlI3 in paraNo of hi orderAnnexure PlsI Ilit9I7lundarldIleld that the orderdated Julv9 1960hadattilitd Iiilalilyatldthc said dccisiotlctllllllll be and ni t Ilangeeould bc inade by the Special Collectorllarvana iil Illc stIine yct ht7ctTcdin dismissingthe appeal filedbythelaIItltlwneioetilitlllers cJ Because the tlriler Anllertirc Pll havingnot becn challcnged by anyone ti Ille Iellatlts and theState thc authorities are lcl 1v014IIllltlleir righ1514ilhinlhe atnbil01 Ille saidorderand under 1111IlrovisirlllI3t Iilw the salne could be rcn opened Duringthe course lIl itrgunlentslhe partieswere a ide7n111respect ofselection madeIll tlle lllndtllviler in form I Oll 19061958ie afler the inserliotltIt Scctitln 5A 5B and 5C in tllc Acl vide PunjabAct NoA6 0f 11157 1le saicl fact is admitted in the writtcn statemellt filed 011 belIillt tlf SpecialCclllector Haryaila in the presentset of writ petitionstlld lltllicecl in lllc order clatcd 23 121969 passedby the CollecllcJt Ittacliecl iiI citrlier writ pctition filed by lancowner It is also I ecordetl itl the order datcd KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 408 OU11 1l187passed by tlltl fIivisioil lleilch of this Courl in the said lt writ pelitionas well EtSIll Iheorder by the SpecialCollector eP on 29891 997 Mr A0Iltllorti Senii1r Advocate appearing Oll behalf of the legalhelI t1 tlie Iandowner arguedthat thc for the decliliIItitlil111slirplusland of the landolvner shall be deemed to be petltlillg on tlle date of commencement of The llarlna Ceillngof l iiiId l loldings Act l 972 for short tllc HarvallaAct thereloreIlle slirplllS area caseof Om Parkashhas to be decidedin terms ofSertitIn 321iil ofthe HaryanaAct read with Section 1046bl of the Act Il is argLiedthat the orderpassed bytheSpecialCollector is ilIIl slislliiilallle as thesurplus arca oflllC land owned by Onl Parkilslli9 rcclliired Io be reietermined aflct A his dcath on 191992 as 1111tlle 9aicl clate the land was not utilized lt is arguedthat tlle IallclCUll lle said to be utilizcd onl 1 1 when possessionis handed Ill llle telliillts after allotmenl of tllor V J land and on ofotllei I7lnllalilies1lle ordel ofallotillcilt 1 itself does not amoutlt ttl tllt cullljllelioil of the process 01 utilization Reliance lS placed Ille l Ionble SupremeColitl judgnlcntreportedas FinuneioI Commissioner Harvana und others Vs Smt Kela Devi tintl unother AIR 1980 SC309 Krishnu Kumari and another l1seStute of Hrtrvanaand another 1999 SCC 338 and upon FuII Ilelich iudgnlentofthis Coun lll Smt Aiit Kaur and others Vse Tiiil PtIniab Stttte and others 1980 PLJ 354 It is also arguedthat IlItIclrdcr piis9cc1bythc Finilnclill Colllllll9sloner on 16091 995 rellllllldill Illc cIse to the Special KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 13 409 fotcle novo deterlninationis cletPtned for rC llector 4 of the liintltlwnerOm Pirkash Thus detennination of surplus case r part of land would be available fr by tlle tenants as no landarea is to be determilledill llle IlInds t11Iegallleirs ofOmParkashandnot as in the hands Il Om larkasll Reliance is placedupon Antu Vs Naresh Sanin 2001 21 RCR ivio 79DBPbl Anoop Sittehand others VseThe Stnte of Harvunll und others20082 RCR Civill 626iIIBePballd Sordura Sin11 andothersVs The Financial Comniissioner and otliers 2008 RCR Civil1744Full BenchmPbJe It is argued thatthe ordei dttted091171960 has been passed by the Collector thoughthe 91iilllIIScase 1f the landowncr was to be decidedbySpccijilCcIllcctorin terms of Rulc 4B ofthe Rules as thc land ofdeceiislld IligIandwner was situatecl ln more than one district and tllal Ior declarationof surplusland ofOm Parkashshall I7etlcelnedtt1 be pendingalso Ior the reason that form F has not llcetl Reliance is placcd uponGurdial SinRh liedl bv his lRs VseStateofHarvana 1991 1 RRR 541SBPB andAnooil SinIi und others Vs The Sttite ofHanaIla and others2008 RlR CiIiO 626DB Pbe Mr LllVerma AclvcJciite111 beltlf of the te17a17lS argucdlhat Order dated 9 19611ClllliltIl Ile said to be void llr wilhout j urisdiction only IrIr tl le 1CUStIll llIal tllc same was passcd by Collector and not by Speciiil C 11iector and that surplusIailci case cannot be reopenedfor the 5iiicl reOSOIl tlloLighthe selcction 0i the landowner should bave beci I nIlide IuItIwii to the partieslt is also the case of the tenants illitl sclection tlf a pemlissiblcarca KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 r r 410 by the landownerctiiIiiot Ioe eitherbythe act e r by of Iali Iexceplwitll Ille wrilten consent of of parties or Phe tenants affectedby thc chltillic l cariledcounselalso relied a IIivislon Bench judgrnel iIs 111tllis Clouit reported as Laland others VseStoteofHIirllltnaund olhers 2001 ll PLJ 148 andKamla Devi and othersVseStateofHurvana and others2010 21SLJ IPH 811 It is arglittltliat lhe Ilind vests with Statcoil the001n111ncement of HaryallEI Acl thereforethesurplusland area casecannot be reieterinlnell A fter having hclliI Ietlrilcdctlilnsel for the particsat some lcngth we find thIIl the 1711 Iowitlgquestionsarisc for considerationl Whether llle tlrller dated 0907 960 passed bv the ColletIor Ill respect of surplusareaof Olll Parkaslli5 0Ilal iillll tlpcrative2 iil Whethei Ihclllild wiis unutilized on 19071992 100 the dlite tlf tlealIlof Om Parkash therefore the surpl IIs Iand area was requiredto be rv dctenllJJlcd111 terlils of Section 33 of thc Haryailli Acl relidIvithSection 101 oflhc Acl ii il WhetlIei llle tenants permissible arca deteriiliited in ordet dated 93 1960 vests lvilh tenalils alld slaild utilized on the said dale itScll To consider Illc respcctivcargulnentsof lhc Icarncd counsel for the parlies tlle rclevailt provisionsof the Punjab Securil of Iand Tenure Act 1953 and Rules framed thereInder and thc provislonsof tlle IlfiryanuCeiling of Land HoldingsAct 1972 neecl lo be exlraclttl Sticll jorovisions read as uncler The PunjallSeeurItyuf Ltitid Tenures Act 1953 KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document l0 411 A Declaration lly Aflldnlits To Be 1 Furnished ByCertain RntltlwtlersAnd 1enants Everl 1 or tenant ulllo owti5 11r IIoldsIiitidin excess of the 0 andwhere lIiltl is situilled 111IllOre than onc area Patwarcircle sllall furnisll it peritltlcll six moiltllsI7Olll thecoinrnencement of the IliilIabSecuritytll Land Tellures Act 1957 ot dcLIariitioll bv 1111 affidavitin respectof the Iililil twtIed tlr IIcldbyhim in such forinand inanner atldtcl sucli 15 Illlly heprescribed 5mBSelection of Pernlis9iltle Area nnd 0Insequenees or Failureto Selectl A wholhas not excrcisedhi5 rightof reservatitlnunderIlis AlO1itIiiv selecthis permissible area and intilnatethe selti Iloll ttl llIe authoritl withintheperiodspecified iiI 9ection5 A anditl suchformand nianneras nlay beprescrilled Providedthat a wllll 15 reclulred to Iitrllisll i declarationunder SectitIti lneA sholl ftitifnale his seiectioii alongwith that declaratioii 21 lf a landownecfai1 to sclcct Iiis pennissibie area iil accordancewith the ptl tl isii1115rIl ubsection I l J tlle authority maysuIIjecllo lhc ofSection C selecttheparcelclr the I ircclsol landwhich suchpcrson19 entitledto retainundertllt IlrllVISltlllStJf IlIisActl Providedthat the Ilresctilled autlllIrity shall not make the selection withotlt gilng lhe Iontltlwnerconcerned llll opportunity of beingheiilLl 5C PenaltyFor Failurr i o Itrnish IJeclaration I l l Il 1 Iandowneror tenant fails Io Iltrnishtllc declaratioilsupporled by an aftldailit as rellililed Ily 9ectitlli A the prescribcd authority tlot below ther1IlIkt 11OIntrollertnay byorder direti that the wholc clr part111Ilie Iiitld 01 slich IandownerOr leililllt in excess of ten standattl 7icres lo Ilc specitled bysuchauthottI shall be deetned to br tllc 9111IIIIS uretl 01 such landowllCl tlr tenant and shall be 111i1iIeilhythe State Governmentor lllc purposenlentioned in 9rt llo 10 A XXX rxxx 10A SurplusArea Il lIr Itesettlement of EjcctedTenants tal The State C1overniI It nl tlr al tIlllcer cmpowcredblr It Ill this beha shalI he cfripeleltl to ulilie any surpIusarea 10r the resettnent oftetlittIt ejectediIt ItI Ile ejectedunder clallsc i90fsubnesectionlllol9eclinn 9 KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 412 IblNotwithstantluiilIything coIitainedin any otherIaw lol lhetiineheillgill Itllctlalld save itl Illc case of landacquired bl t theState GovemllltIltIlllderally Itlwior thetimebeingin force 104 orby an heir b1 IillIeriltlilcctlIl trItlsferor otherdisposition clf 10 I8uldwhich is coinjIriseiI in surpliis area at the commencement ofthisAct shallrIileclIlIeutilizationthereofinclause al n it Il tllili7lttitlil11fany surplusarea will not effecttherighttll llle Iillldtlwllelttl rcceiverenl fromthetcntint 50settled ThePunjabSreurioIof land TenuresRules 1956 3 Form etee 01deeliIrntiIInunder Section5mAof the Acl 11 he declilmlioil by an amdavitrequired to he furnishedundeI9cctitIil5Il tf ihc Act shallbe funlishcdbl 1 IandownerinlIottns A andl andbyatenantin Fonns B and C either cii lly registered post duelto 6a1 thet 1ftliedisirict if hisland is situatedill SUCIIpalwlir circles ils are comprised within tlIlc dislri Il iltitl 1111 tht7Slleciitl1Illecilr if his Iandis sltutitedin such 1 patwiIr cicles as ore conlprised in more thanone dislrlrl 443 PrescribeIlnulhorilyunder subasection121of Section 50B and SeelllInSe of the Aet for the purposeof stll section 21 cIf 9ectitliI 5011nnd Section 5aCof the Act the prescribed sltallhe 0ilthe t IIlecttlrif tlIelandsownedor held bv a Ianc owner or teniInl are siluiite iiI patwarcirclescolnprised 111Olle district and Iiil tlIe peeitiIollettor ifthe landsowncd or heldIll a landownertll Ielitlllt ttlc sllliate in patwarcirclescotnprised ill nlore thanone tllslrlct 6 Assessnletit of surplus area with landowners and tenants XXX XXX XXX 7 01 The IlccltlrlIr the SpecialCollector shall prcparc a statement tn Icrm l iitid fcltward immediately a copy thereof 10 the IandoWl ltI tll teilanl cclncerned under COver 01 lll endorsenoerItIltescrllleilin Ille Fornl and il shaJl be serve41Llptlll the landowllel tlr Iellalll Ils il it were a summons ill the mtinllcr prescribed 111Scctitnl 91101 tlIePunjabTenant Act 1887 KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document r1 1 413 iil The SpecialColletlltll alstl1711irda copy of lornl l by him to the l tIllectoroi every districtin whichthc t Sltrplus area ofthc or lenttiIt is 51tuate 91 0 Cl TheHaryanaCeilingtIl Ianll IloldingAet 1972 12 Vestingof surplusillll l l he surpIlIS areaor a landowner shall 6from IlItediitetln wllich i1is declaredas such shall be deemed to II1ive llecltl tietjltiredby the Staic Government for a publIr purposelIvideAct Nol 7 of 19761 and ali rightstitle iii 111illtercst 0ncludingthe contingetlt interestif any recognlleIl lll 011 Iaw custom or usagefor the time beingin force1 t Il l IlerStlllSIll 5uch areashall stand andsuchitlllts lltle itld itltcrestsball 1cstin thcl StateGovernmeiltfree etlCUmhrance 21 The rightand inlrlrst 11fthc tetlanl in his sutpllisarcl whichis included1thltl Iltejlertllissihle ilrea 01lhe Iandotvllei shallstand 131 The area declaretl 1111lus llr teilalltS permissible arcil underthe Punjablalv diItl tlle arctl decliiredsurplusunderllle PepsuLaw which Ilils Iltll Sll ftir vested in the Stalc Government shal be tlectlled llI h2111vested in the SttIle Governmentwith efTeetIi tlnI the dayand the 211CO which may be so declliirtl liiIdcr Ihe Plilljablaw or tlle Pepvu laiv afterlhe appoinled ilIl vIltIllIle dctltiledto havevestedIll the State Govenulleill il ItlI el1ect IitlItl the datc 01 such declaration Vldc Act Ntl tIf 19761 33 Repealand Savings XXX xxr 1 21liil the proceeding tili Ille delmiilalion ofthe surplusarcti pending lIettlr the COllllllencementof this Acl under the provisions 01 rI lhcr 01 tlIe5itid enacttnents which shallbe continuedendtllIlosed0f1 a5 it thisAcl hlid nol bccn passedand thesurplus 1111iistI determitledshallvest in andIlc utilized bv the State t ltIvernmcntlll accordancewith tlle provisionsof thisAct The Schcrne 01 tl ie At iilcludiilg thc SCOPC il f Sections 5evA 5B 82