IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30788 of 2010 KARI MIAN @ KARI @ KARIYA SON OF LATE JAFARUL MARHUK @ JAFARU MIAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 2.2.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 364, 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 5.11.2009 vide Cr.Misc.No.31693 of 2009 but stating therein that it was being rejected for the present. It has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 10.6.2009 and the case has already been committed to the court of Sessions. Considering the same, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of District and Sessions Judge, Purnea in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 94 of 2005, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor shall be the son of the petitioner and the other bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about 2 any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash,J.)