IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13325 of 2010 1. ASHA RANI D/O RAJENDRA KUMAR, W/O RAMESH KUMAR PASWAN R/O VILL.- KESHOPUR, P.S.- CHANDANPATTI, DISTT.- MUZAFFARPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY PRIMARY EDUCATION, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR PRIMARY EDUCATION, BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE MUZAFFARPUR 5. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION MUZAFFARPUR 6. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER SAKAR BLOCK AT MUZAFFARPUR 7. THE MUKHIYA GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ KATESHAR BLOCK SAKRA AT MUZAFFARPUR 8. PANCHAYAT SECRETARY GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ KATESHAR BLOCK SAKARA DISTT.- MUZAFFARPUR 9. MEMBER DISTRICT TEACHERS APPOINTMENT APPELLATE AUTHORITY, MUZAFFARPUR ----------- 02. 11.4.2011 Anneuxre-8 is the order which has been passed by the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, which disposed of a bunch of cases together since the questions related to appointment of Panchayat teachers in Gram Panchayat Raj Kateshar for the year 2006-07. The tribunal after going through the entire gamut of the fact related to each and every claimant or appointee has come to a decisive conclusion in para 44 that various illegalities or irregularities had been committed in the matter of appointment of the petitioners who were ultimately ordered to be removed. The rationale or the reason given therein has not been explained by the petitioner except for the statement that there was a meeting of the Gram Panchayat and it is the Gram Panchayat which 2 decided to appoint the present petitioner as would be evident from Anneuxre-5. The question is not whether meeting of the Gram Panchayat was held but the question is whether meeting of Gram Panchayat has been conducted in accordance with the procedure prescribed for such appointment, in consonance with the preparation of merit list, implementation of the roaster clearance and appointment of persons who had the requisite merits. The findings are all loaded against the petitioner. In that view of the matter this Court is not inclined to interfere with the order in question. The writ application is dismissed being devoid of merit. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)