WP(C) 1432/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANIMA HAZARIKA Heard Mr. D Das, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also hear d Ms. K Baruah, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. B Goswami, learned SC , Water Resource Deptt. appearing for respondents. Considering the grievance raised in this petition and also as prayed for by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, this writ petition is being d isposed of at the motion stage itself. The case of the petitioner in brief is that he has been allotted with tw o contract works for supply of different materials vide Work Orders dated 12.1.0 9 and 7.2.09 for Anti-erosion measures to protect Golokganj town and its adjoin ing areas from the erosion of river Gangadhar (Review) part-II . The petitioner completed all the work orders in time and accordingly submitted the bills to the respondents. The grievance of the petitioner is that after making part payment, the remaining amount of the bills has not been paid to him and there is an outs tanding amount of Rs.17.51,287/-(Rupees seventeen lakhs fifty one thousand two h undred and eighty seven) only payable to the petitioner. But inspite of repeated request, the aforesaid amount has not been paid to the petitioner till date. It has been further stated by the petitioner that some persons who were allotted c ontract works at the later stage by the respondents have been made up-to-date pa yment against their respective bills. But, the petitioner has been singled out b y the respondents by discriminatory treatment. Hence, the petitioner has approac hed this Court by filing the instant writ petition. It is admitted at the Bar that such payment of the contractor’s bill and the manner and method to be dealt with in such case has been rendered by a Full Bench of this Court in WA No.484/2008 and similar other 194 writ petitions repo rted in 2008 (4) GLT 1 (FB) (Tamsher Ali and Ors. Vs. State of Assam and Ors.) a nd the issue involved in the instant case is covered by the aforesaid decision. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of with the directi ons that the petitioner as well as the respondent authorities shall be bound by the principle of law and directions as passed in the case of Tamsher Ali (supra) and the respondent authorities shall deal with the grievance of the petitioner as per the directions contained in Tamsher Ali (supra) and pay the amount to the petitioner to which he is entitled. With the above directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. No cos ts.