1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.14 OF 2009 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.3378 OF 2007 Mohd. Rafiq Khan Abdullah Khan. ..Plaintiff. Vs. Suhas Mohan Lavekar. ..Defendant. Ramesh Jain for the plaintiff. None for the Defendant. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATED : 10TH JULY, 2009 PC : 1. An affidavit of service dated 10.7.2009 and the list of original documents also dated 10.7.2009 are taken on record. Heard Advocate for the plaintiff. The Advocate for the defendant is absent. The record indicates that he was absent when the matter was last called out on 2.7.2009. No reply is filed. No leave to defend the suit is sought. 2 2. The suit of the plaintiff is for recovery of an amount of Rs.1,32,679.45ps. as per the statement of claim. The statement of claim indicates that the claim amount includes Rs.1/- lac being the amount mentioned on the promissory note and balance amount of Rs. 32,679.45 is the interest amount at the agreed rate of interest. The original promissory note has been produced with the list of documents and the same indicates that the promissory note was for an amount of Rs.1/- lac and the interest was agreed at 21% p.a. Further averment indicates that the plaintiff made demand of the due amount with 21% interest vide his letter dated 17.8.2006. The acknowledgment has been produced along with the list of documents. There is no reply to this letter. Since no leave to defend the suit has been sought, suit is decreed with costs. ( R.S.MOHITE, J. )