^ HIGH COURT OFGHHATTISOAfW. BILASPUR S.B.: HON'BLESHRUUSTICESUNILKUMARSINHA CONTEMPT CASE (Cl N0.77/2010 APPLICANT Shahji Nag S/o Boti Nag, Age about 38 years, R/o Chhatrapati Shiva}i Ward No. 35 Titerkutiapara Aghanpur, Jagdalpur (C.G.) VERSUS Shri R.P. Mandal Secretary, Scheduled Caste, Scheduted Tribe and Bakward Class Welfare Oepartment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) B.L. Anant Commisstoner, Tribal Development, Raipur (C.G.) Netrapal Singh Secretary, Mata Rukamani Sewa Sansthan Samiti Dimrapal. Tah. & Districl- Jagdalpur (C.G.) CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA CONTEMPTNORS 1 NON-APPLICANTS 2. 3. ADpearance: Mr. S.P. Kale. Advocate forthe petitioner. Mr. Arun Sao, Counsel for respondent No. 1 & 2, ORALORDER (15.07.2010) SUNIL KUMAR SINHAJ. Heard. Replyon behalf of respondent No. 1 & 2 has been filed. Mr. Arun Sao, tearned counsel appearing on behalf ofrespondent No. 1 & 2. submits that after passing the order in writ petttion on 24th September, 2009, the respondents have paid a sum of Rs. 1,03,580/- to the petttioner. The details along with receipt of the pethtioner have been filed as Annexure-R-2. Mr. Arun Sao submits that the respondente have not committed willful default of the order passed by this Court and tiiey are always inclined to comply the Court order in its tetter and spi'rits. Mr. S.P. Kale, submits that even after making payment of 1,03,580/-, more amount is to be receh/ed by the peUtioner, however, since the bonafides of the respondent is shown by making such paymenf, he seeks permission to withdraw ttiis petition atttiis stagewitti ^, \^€/ '^s^ CONTEMPT CASE iC) N0.77/2010 liberty to file another petition at anappropriate stage, if such an exigency arises in future. Permission granted. Accordingly, the Contempt Petftion is disposed of s®withdrawn at this stege with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the priitioner. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge