IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1875 OF 2009 Shri.Suresh Dhondiba Thorve & Anr. ...Petitioners V/s. Shri.Vitthal Maruti Gaikwad & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Ashok B.Tajane for Petitioners. None for Respondents. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. FEBRUARY 27, 2009. FEBRUARY 27, 2009. FEBRUARY 27, 2009. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the Petitioners. 2. No interference with the discretionary order in exercise of writ jurisdiction is warranted. Hence, dismissed. 3. Needless to observe that the fact the Petitioners want to bring on record can always be proved or established by producing relevant evidence in that behalf. : 2 : 4. If such evidence is produced, the Court is obliged to consider the same appropriately. Moreover, the Court below shall not be influenced by the factum of rejection of subject application while considering other proceedings pending before it. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.