IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.8516 of 2011 Date of Decision : May 13, 2011. Ram Lal .....Petitioner versus The State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Dr.M.L.Sachdeva, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks a mandamus to step up his pay and bring it at par with his juniors in terms of the Instructions dated 21.6.2000 (Annexure P-9) issued by the Finance Department. The above stated claim is sought by the petitioner vide representation dated 13.4.2009 (Annexure P-11) also followed by a reminder dated 30.7.2008 (Annexure P-13), however, no decision appears to have been taken thereupon by the respondent-authorities so far. In these circumstances, however, without expressing any views on the entitlement of the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and CWP No.8516 of 2011 [2] dispose of the above mentioned claim of the petitioner as contained in his representation dated 13.4.2009, by passing a speaking order within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. May 13, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE