SCA/8089/1996 1/3 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 8089 of 1996 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= SARADA SISU VIHAR TRUST - Petitioner(s) Versus GITABEN K PATEL - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MR RK MISHRA for Petitioner(s) : 1, MR GM AMIN for Respondent(s) : 1, ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH Date : 30/10/2006 ORAL JUDGMENT By way of this petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner school management has challenged the legality and validity of the interim order dated SCA/8089/1996 2/3 JUDGMENT 20th October 1995 passed by the Gujarat Primary Education Tribunal as well as the order passed by the Tribunal dated 27.9.1996 in Review Application No. 255 of 1995. 2. Today, when the matter is called out, Shri RK Mishra, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner school management has submitted that during pendency of the present Special Civil Application the review application made before the Tribunal has already been decided by the Tribunal by judgment and order dated 20th July 2001. He has produced on record the xerox copy of the judgment and order passed by the Tribunal dated 20th July 2001 in Applications No. 2/1993, 380/1993 and 255 of 1995 which is directed to be taken on record. In view of the above, when the main application itself has been decided and disposed of by the Tribunal, no further order is required to be passed by this Court on this petition as the same has become SCA/8089/1996 3/3 JUDGMENT infructuous. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of as the same became infructuous. Rule is discharged. Ad-interim relief stands vacated forthwith. [ M.R. Shah, J. ] rmr.