CRM No.M-3739 of 2011.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CRM No.M-3739 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.05.2011 **** Mukesh Goyal . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Haryana . . . . Respondent **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. GS Sandhu, AAG Haryana **** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The prayer in this petition is for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.55 dated 10.06.2010 registered under Sections 406/420/467/468/471/120- B/34/506 IPC PS Sector 14, Panchkula. (2). As per the allegations contained in the FIR, the petitioner allegedly entered into an ‘agreement to sell’ in respect of an immoveable property with one Manish Sehajpal. Thereafter, another ‘agreement to sell’ in respect of the same property was entered into between Manish Sehajpal and the complainant. However, in order to dupe the prospective buyer of the second agreement, CRM No.M-3739 of 2011.doc - 2 – the petitioner and Manish Sehajpal are said to have cancelled their earlier agreement to sell. (3). It is not in dispute that the investigation is complete and the challan has already been presented. The case is now fixed for framing of charges on 06.07.2011. The petitioner is incarcerated since 07.01.2011. He is facing a Magisterial trial. The conclusion of the trial is likely to take time. (4). For the reasons afore-stated, however, without expressing any views on the merits of the allegations and counter-allegations, this petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Panchkula. (5). Dasti . 02.05.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge