IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7054 of 2010 SUNIL PRASAD @ SUNIL KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 09.03.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The allegations are under Sections 304B, 498A and 201/34 of the Penal Code with demands for dowry. The defence on behalf of the petitioner is of death by diarrhoea on way to the hospital. There is no material pleaded or noticed in the impugned order why the petitioner, as the husband, did not take her to the hospital and if he did what was the nature of the treatment given. The onus lying upon the petitioner under Section 304B IPC, this Court is not persuaded to grant him the privilege of bail. This application is rejected. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)