IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16900 of 2011 Balmukund Prasad Gupta Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 24.06.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 467, 468, 469, 471, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of making interpolation in the sale deed. Learned counsel for the petitioner drew the attention of this court to Annexure-“A”, which is report of the inspector of registration to the effect that the vendor Mushharu Yadav, deed writer Sitaram Yadav, computer operator, Chandan Kumar’s complicity was suspected. One of the interpolations in the sale deed was executed by son Saroj Kumar who has been granted bail by this court vide Cr. Misc. No. 10416 of 2011 on 09.05.2011 by this court. Considering the fact that name of the petitioner does not figure in the report 2 of the inspector of registration as contained in Annexure-3, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Saharsa (Sadar)P.S. Case No. 509 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Saharsa, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)