C^1 ^' ^ 'cw IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON (S) N0 ^ ^^6 /2010 WRITPETITIONUNDERARTICLE2260FTHECONSTITUTIONOF INDIA, PETITIQNER RESPONDENTS 36lewanand Namdeo, aged aboyt 40 years, son of Shri P.N. Namdeo occupation — Lecturer, Presently working as Lecturer, Govt Hlgher Secondary School - Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh (CG) VERSUS 1.' State ofChhattisgarh, through- Secretary, Department of Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Offlcer, Distt. Raigarh (CG) 3./''^Joint:l:>irector(Treasury, A/c & ^-PensiorT), Bilaspyr (CG) 4. Asst. Commiss^^^ Dept. of Tnbal,Distt. Raigarh (CG) 5. ' Pnnctpal, <36vt Higher Secondary Sehool - Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh ;.(CG) ...:' , ! : . : sn^iw f<-ti<* W 31KW *N14) Tumane 'yss '^ww'ef, w-^ww, Hdl^^< ....t^:;.£:..Cs,.l....te.5..^ 3^'q5RT(1pi3^q) 'S^TW^f^T 3Ti^?T SB : Hon'ble Shri ManindraMohan SBI'ivastava.J, ncretnents 18-08-2010 Shri Tarun Dansena, counsel for] Shri Ajit Singh, Panel Lawyer for Heard. Learned counsel appearing for tl^e entitled to benefit of two advance ii B. Ed.examination before his appointn^ent the issue involved in the present petittoj has been finally decided by the Hon'b( Saxena vs. State of M.P. & Ors^ submitted that this Court has also ta| 06-07-2010 passed in W.P.(S)No.3250 On the other hand.submission State is that this petition has been filed vj Government. He prays that ifthe petitior^ will be considered on its own nnerits and In this view ofthe matter, 1 am stage. It would be open fbr the petition^ making appropriate representation, claii orders referred ID above. In case such decide the same in accordance with lawj With the aforesaid observations, ^lllicl'fM 'iWvS f^ ft^t <1«1(<;1< ^i'3iiWt3"^( :he petitioner. he State/respondents on advanee copy. :11e petitioner submits thatthe petitioner is on account of he having passed at his own cost It is submitted that is no longer res integra and the same Supreme Court in the case of Asha ^009 W lUO'JR (SC) 59. It is further ken a similar view in his order dated e|f2010. rf learned counsel for the respondents- I'ithout making any approach to the State T would make represehtation, the same jn accordancewith law. ndt inclined to entertain this petition atthis to approach the State Government by |ning parity of treatment on the basis of r4presentation is made, respondents shall ;he petition stands disposed of. ^-1 Sd-/ ManindraMohanShrivartava „ Judge «wf\llS^t ljffl»v»S,.IVSWf'tif— FS/1J7—2/201U—1,00,000. Ull.l