1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.__________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3031 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL ST NO. 4491 OF 2001 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3032 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 4629 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3033 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 4627 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar/s orders | and Registrar’s orders | Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for the State CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 30 th November, 2009 1 Heard learned AGP for the State. 2 Judgments and award dt. 8-8-2006 recorded by the learned 2 nd Ad-hoc Additional District Judge, Beed in LAR nos. 1/2003, 2/2003 and 3/2003 are under challenge. However, there is delay of 782 2 days in causing to file the appeal. 3 Learned AGP submits that the appeal is based on legal grounds. However, according to her, though proposal is forwarded by Law and Judiciary department on 6-8-2006, the matter could not be further prosecuted and delay is caused. 4 The reasons assigned speak of laxity and avoidance of obligation from the concerned. It will not amount to be a reasonable ground to condone the delay. Consequential benefits accrued to the respondents / claimants also need not be interfered. Taking stock of the fact that delay of 782 days in respective appeals being not properly explained, applications are dismissed with respective appeals. Necessary court fees be refunded as per rules. ( K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.) dyb / office /ca3031.09.odt 3