s' j- i Uu ST ilj Prasad Dewangan, Aged years, S/o Shri Samela! l^ •^l- -Sk ,^-2^-g...^ ^^^€\^ , Block Kota, Distt. :.<u^^. \ ^^'^ %^\^ '"%tf^®S? ^l ^'..A SB : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PSITIKKER mWAKE.R vei-sus Islrwsa" i'ra.sad Dewaiisan State ot'C.G. & O&ers S&ri K.S.PawaT, counsel for the petitioaer. Shri Praveen Das, Dy. G. A. for tae State. s'.MS^ Grievance of the petinoiier ia the present petilion is tnat fhe petitioner was initially appomted as Depitty T'eacher on a fixed pay scale of Rs. 100-150 fbr a period of two years and alter coinpletion of probatioil, he was granted regular pay scale ofRs. 169-300. Conten.tion ot t.tic counsel f6r fee oetitioner is tti.at he is eBti'ded for reg'lllar pay scaje wittl effect frosa. ti-ie date of iaitiaj. appoJLncin.ent aad Ms case is squarely covered with nuiliber of decisions passed 'by this Court and also fae judgnient readered by . the M.P. Stste Admmisu-ative Tribimal, Jabalpur m 0^1. No. S74S/S9 (Mtidhu.SestR.t Yadu & S6 Qthers ys. State ofM.P. <Ss Others's wliere m it hss bee.n hcld that suaila.riy placed teaciiers are entitled for regular pay scale from the date offheir iriitiai, sppoifitme&t. It is not disputcd by bofh the parties that fhe m.atter w&s tak'en up by the State to the Apex Court but tts.e appeal was also disinissed 'hy tlie Apex Court upholdiilg fhe decisioa of &e Triln:mai to the effect .that tlie Teacliers/Assistsuit Teachers ate entitled for regular pay scsle froai the date of tiieir iajtisl appointmcnt. l~a view of tbe above subinission tnade bv the counsel for the pa^ties, fbe peutiou is disposed of iri flie sejne temis i.e. tlie pctitioner is granted Hberty to laalce a represen'tation, if so ad'B-ised, jri idkiB iii k ^^ B i titt iWiUi i Bt LUik i'i 'vassssiss ^ fhe Mgiit of the aforesaid judgiaent. aild the circular dat.ed 5.1.2011 (Anaexure P/2) aad in tura, fhe coacenied respondent is directed to consider tbeir case on its own xnerits aiid ia its perspective. If fhe petitioner stands on tiie saine footiug as per onler passed by fcc Stat.e Administrative Trimuial ia Madhukant Yadu (supra'i a-ud subsequently coBiirraed by t'he Suprenie Court in Special I^eave Pctition (Civfli N0. 6892^93 by order dated 03.01.95, tlie petitioner raay bc entitled to same reUef accoTdiiigly. It is expected frovi the State authorities to pass suiteble order ;r due scrutiav of tlie facts. It is inade cle&T tjiat fhis court has not e?q}ressed aiiy opaiioE on the laerits of the case and the aufeorit'y' concemed would be at. liberly to decide f&e representation stricfiy in accoriaiice with law. Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge