1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Civil Application No.2029 Of 2010 In Review Application Stamp No.24701 Of 2009 In Writ Petition No.8541 Of 2006 Narendra S/o Dinkar Patil & Another. .. Applicants. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others. .. Respondents. -------- Shri. S.R. Barlinge, Advocate for applicant. Shri. R.P. Phatke, Additional Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 and 2. Shri. Ruturaj Patil, Advocate, for respondent No.3. -------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE: 5th APRIL 2010 2 PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) The learned counsel Shri. S.R. Barlinge appearing for the review petitioners submits that this Court did not consider the prayer clauses while passing the order under review and second ground is in respect of suspension order passed by respondent No.3 dated 26-8-2009. 3) The counsel further submits that the respondent No.3 transgressed the order passed by this Court under review dated 6th May 2009 in not issuing show cause notice. 4) We have considered the submissions advanced. Perused the earlier petition and the order passed by us. There is delay in filing the review application. The delay is not properly explained. We do not find any error 3 in the view and the order passed by us. There is no case for entertaining this review application. 5) The application for condonation of delay and the review application are dismissed. (N.D. DESHPANDE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl/ wp.3586.07