‘ nu (he/ab; 63 @gaygh @méah IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Cy) No. 3/1 w of 299g LL {I PETITIONER: XNarendra Pandey , aged about 33 years, S/o Shri Chakradhar Pandey, by caste Brahmin, R/o behind Sabji Market, near Bamhar Mandir, Chantidih Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (CG). Versus 1.€nri Anil KumaraAgrawal, aged 35 years ~ S/o Shri R.K. Agrawal. I/' 2. Shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal, S/o Shri R.K. Agrawal. Both R/o behind Sabji Mandi, near ‘ Bamhar Mandir, e Chantidih, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (CG). 3. The Additional Collector, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (CG). a Sub Divisional Officer (R), Bilaspur , Tahsil and District Bilaspur (CG), 5’. The Naib Tahsildar, Bilaspur (CG). Ju I ”ix WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE/227 $2.6 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: As stated in the cause title above. HIGH COURT OF CHHA’TTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PE’I‘ITION (C) PR N0. 5012 0f2009 mg» ym n PETlTiONER Narendra Pandey. Q RESPONDENTS Shri Anil Kumar Agrawal 8i Others, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTXCLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ’SB: Hall’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Nona for thegpetitioner. Shri Shashan‘; Thakur; Panel Laxwer for the State/respondea‘i ‘ u f \ ‘ i { No. 3 to 5. 0RDILR (ORAL) (Passed on 14‘ f June: 2f} 1 1) The mattar is cailed for hearing twice. 1 Tone afa‘pears nor is anv rapresemmion made on behaif of the peti‘iioner. The petitioner may not be interesied in pursuing rhe matter. In View ofthe above. the maiter is dismisseé for want of ' prosecution. Satish K. Agnihotri ‘\