^. ^tf^ 1 yieiiCOURT^FCHNArriSirA^^^^ DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLESHRIJAG&ISH BHALLA.Ag. CJ. & HON'BLE SHRI SATISH K. AfiNIHOTRI, J. Writ ADpeal No. 304 of 2007 AoDdlant PetJtSeiie?' Mrs Savitri Jhciriya AQ€^about 32 years, W/o Shri Shatrughan Prased Jhariya, President of Rani Self Help ©roup, VilSa9€ MandalQtola, Qram Ponchflyat Mandalatola, R/o VISSa9e MQndajatoto, Distt KawardhQ (Kabirdham) (C6) Versus Resoondents 1. State of Chhatti^or+i. Through Coli^^tor/&j^trii^t Kablrdhetm 2. Sub - Dlvisional Officer (Revenue) Kawdir*dhQ (C&) Writ Aooeal under Sectipn 2(1) of ChhattisQarh Hiqh Court AooeaJ tp Division Bench Act 2006 Present: None for the oppellant. Shri Vincxy Harit, beputy Advocate ^enerai with 5hri Yashwant Singh Thakur, ^overnment Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 16 Jamiary. 2008) The following oral order of 1+ie Court wds pass^d by Hon'ble Jagdish Bhalla, Ag. C.J. This writ appeal is directed against the order datBd 25.10.2007 passed by learned Single Judge in Writ Petition (C) No. 6408/2007, whereby the writ petition filed by 1+ie petitioner / appellant against the order passed by the Collector, Kabirdham (Kawardha) WQS dismissed. ^) ^?jj-g—pjj- -2- From the perusal of ftule 2 of Chhattisgarh High Court (Appeal to bivision Bench) Act, 2006 it is clear -tiiat no appeal shall lie against an order passed in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of 1tie Constitution of India. Jhe petitioner/appettant hes fiied writ petition against the order passed by the Coliector, Kabirdham (Kawcrdha), therefore, it is not under original jurisdiction. This Court has already decided the said issue by its judgment dated 13th July, 2007 in Writ Appeat (PR) No.3486/2007. Therefore, in the light of the above Judgment, this writ appeal is not maintainable. Accordin9ly, the wr-it appeal is dismissed. A_ Sd/- Ag. Chief Justice padmQ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge :^