IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY THURSDAY, THE 30TH JUNE 2011 / 9TH ASHADHA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 514 of 2011(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER DATED 25/02/2011 IN WPC.5587/2011 .................... PETITIONER(S): 1ST PETITIONER ------------------------- BAJAJ ALLIANZ LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY INDIA LIMITED, 2ND FLOOR, THANGAM COMPLEX, OPP.HOTEL SHAH INTERNATIONAL,CHINNAKKADA, KOLLAM-691001,REP.BY ITS ZONAL MANAGER ASHISH MISHRA, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O.LATE SRI.L.N.MISHRA BY ADV. SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR SRI.A.K.JAYASANKAR NAMBIAR SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI SRI.P.BENNY THOMAS SRI.P.GOPINATH RESPONDENT(S): / RESPONDENTS --------------- 1. MR.C.S.VINOD, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), SECRETARY, NEW GENERATION BANKS & INSURANCE EMPLOYEES UNION (AITUC), NEAR PADMA THEATRE, FLOWER JUNCTION, PUTHENCHAL ALI MUHAMMED BUILDING, JEWS STREET, ERNAKUALM, KOCHI-682035 2. MR.SREEJITH.S., (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) S/O.SUKUMARA PILLAI,SREEJA NIVAS VALATHUNGAL P.O.,KOLLAM DISTRICT-691018 3. MR.C.RAJAGOPAL I.P.S (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM-691001. 4. MR.E.BIJU (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE EAST POLICE STATION,KOLLAM-691001 MR.GEORGE MICHEIL, GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.K.R.VINOD, FOR R1 & R2 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: COC NO.514/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ANNEXURE A : CERTIFIED COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 25/02/2011 IN WP(C) NO.5587/2011. ANNEXURE B : COPY OF COMPLAINT DATED 23/03/2011 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE RESPONDENTS 3 & 4. //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE. jg C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & BHABANI PRASAD RAY, JJ. ---------------------------------- COC No.514 of 2011 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 30th day of June, 2011 J U D G M E N T Ramachandran Nair, J. Learned counsel for respondents 1 & 2 denied any violation of the undertaking given to the Court. On behalf of respondents 3 & 4, learned Government Pleader submitted that Police will take timely action, if violation of undertaking is intimated by the petitioner. We record this submission and close the Contempt of Court Case with direction the the Police Officers concerned to take action not only to prevent any kind of obstruction but to prosecute the persons, who cause obstruction or are involved in any offence punishable under law. The petitioner is also free to move this Court if there is violation on the part of the Police to take action. This Contempt of Court Case is accordingly closed. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) (BHABANI PRASAD RAY, JUDGE) jg