1 cp386.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 386 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7546 OF 2009 [ Shramik Shikshan Mandal Sindkheda vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders None for the petitioner. Mr. D.V. Tele, AGP for respondent-State. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 30TH SEPTEMBER, 2011 PER COURT : . When the matter is called out, none appeared for the petitioner. 2. Learned A.G.P. for respondent-State on the basis of written instructions which he has received from the Deputy Director of Education, Nashik Division, Nashik, makes a 2 cp386.10 statement that, the order of which disobedience has been alleged in this contempt petition, has been complied with. He has tendered across the bar a letter received by him from the concerned officer which is taken on record and marked "X" for identification purpose. 3. In the light of the contents in the letter, nothing further survives for consideration in this contempt petition, same stands disposed of. Notice stands discharged. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/SEP11