y 'v- mTHEHIGHCOURtoFCHH^^^^^^ BILASPUK Writ Petition No. 2389 of 2005 Petitioner Kainlal Prajapati, S/o, Sohaalal Prajapati, aged about 51 years, R/o. Tifi"a, P.S. Civil Lines, Distt, Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretaiy, Horae Mtoistr;^ D.K.S« Bhawan, Dist Raipm' (C.G.) Director General of PoMce, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) Superintendent of Police, Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) Deputy Superiatendeut of PoUce, fhrough P.S. SC/ST Kalyaxi, Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) Uinendra Misiua, Asst, Sub-Inspector, P,S, Chakarbhata, Dist. Bilaspm- (C.G.) 2. 3. 4. 5. (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitution oflndia) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri Alok Nigam, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Shri Viaay Harit, Deputy Advocate General for tfie respondents No. 1 to4. 2. 3. OR DER (Passed on this 17th Day of November, 2008) Leanied counsel appearuig tbr the petitioner, on instructions, subniits ttiat the petitioner seeks permission of fhis Court to wlfhdi-aw fhis petition with Mberty to take appropriate action, if so adv^ed, LeaiTied counsel appeaiing for the respondents/State has 110 objection. In view of fhe above, the petition is disxnissed as withdrawn wifh the above-stated Uberty. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur