IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8615 of 2009 ***** Vishwanath Thakur, s/o Late Ram Kishun Thakur, r/o Village Mahesa Farakpur Ward No.2, Tole- Basudeo, P.S. Runnisaidpur, District-Sitamarhi presently Chairman, Vidyalaya Shiksha Samiti, Ward No.2, Tole-Basudeo, P.S. Runnisaidpur, District-Sitamarhi. …. …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Divisional Commissioner, Muzaffarpur. 4. The Collector, Sitamarhi. 5. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Sitamarhi. 6. The District Superintendent of Education-District Coordinator of Program, Bihar Shiksha Pariyozna, Sitamarhi. 7. The Block Education Extension Officer, Runnisaidpur, District-Sitamarhi. 8. The Block Development Officer, Runnisaidpur, District-Sitamarhi. …. …. Respondents ----------- 3. 24.8.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Earlier in C.W.J.C. No. 674 of 2009 a direction was issued by this Court to the District Superintendent of Education, Sitamarhi to investigate and decide the efficacy of setting up a school between two lands which had been offered by two citizens. Now a decision has been rendered on 7.4.2009. The decision states that it was decided to set up the school on the land of Kaushalya Devi way back on 22.11.2008 on due verification of two sites. It has emerged on enquiry that there is water logging in the rainy season on the land of Janki Mandal. This finding is being seriously disputed by the present petitioner. This Court has no mechanism to disbelieve or come to another conclusion based on the pleadings and submission of the petitioner. The Court is not inclined, therefore, to exercise its - 2 - jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ application is accordingly dismissed. Petitioner may pursue the matter before any higher authority or forum. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)