Civil Revision No. 6774 of 2009 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6774 of 2009 Date of Decision: 19.11.2009 Gurkirpal Singh ......Petitioner Versus Financial Commissioner (Revenue), Punjab and others .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri M.L. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral). The grievance of the petitioner is that the amount of compensation has not been paid for the land acquired by way of a Notification published in the year 1994. A perusal of the records shows that there was a Notification dated 23.2.2007 denotifying the acquisition of the land. Such Notification was quashed by this Court on 9.5.2008. The aforesaid order passed by this Court is subject matter of challenge before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The petition for Special Leave has been posted for final disposal as per the order dated 13.4.2009. Civil Revision No. 6774 of 2009 [2] In view of the said circumstance, it cannot be said that there is any inordinate delay in execution proceedings at the instance of the Executing Court, which may warrant interference by this Court, at this stage, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence, the present revision petition is dismissed. [ HEMANT GUPTA ] JUDGE 19-11-2009 ds