1 SA 96.2011 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 96 OF 2011 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. B.R.Warma,Advocate for the appellant. Mrs.. C.S.Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent. .......................... CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 17/03/2011 PER COURT : 1. In fact by order dated 14/3/2011, I had negatived the contention of the appellant and held that the Second Appeal does not involve substantial question of law. The matter was adjourned to enable the parties to take instructions regarding the income of the respondent as Mr. Warma, the learned counsel for the appellant had submitted that the permanent alimony granted is too meagre. Mrs. Deshmukh, the learned counsel for the respondent has placed on record the certificate issued by the Secretary of the institution where the respondent is working. The same is marked ‘ X ’ for identification. 2 SA 96.2011 2. As per the said certificate, the basic salary is shown as Rs. 10,975/- and the gross amount would come to Rs. 20,000/-. Mr. Warma, the learned counsel states that at least Rs. 8,000/- per month be awarded as permanent alimony. I feel that the alimony of Rs. 3,000/- per month awarded by the District Court would be on lower side as compared to the income drawn by the respondent. I enhance the said alimony to Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only ) per month. Save and except amount of permanent alimony enhanced to Rs. 5,000/-, rest of the order passed by the District Court is up-held. The Second Appeal is disposed off. Decree be drawn accordingly. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J. ] KNP/SA 96.2011