IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 13TH MAY 2011 / 23RD VAISAKHA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 3511 of 2011() ---------------------------------------- CRIME NO.149/2011 OF ERNAKULAM CENTRAL POLICE STATION. .................... PETITIONER/ACCUSED -------------------------------------- E.A.JAYAKUMAR,AGED 44 YEARS, S/O.AYYAPPAN PILLAI,50/114 C,VISHNU VIHAR, PONEVAZHY ROAD,CHUTTUPADUKARA,ELAMAKKARA.P.O, EDAPALLY SOUTH VILLAGE,KOCHI-26,KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.ANTONY MATHEW SRI.GEEN T.MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINAN NO. 2 & 3 ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,CENTRAL POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM. 682 031. 2. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,CENTRAL ZONE ERNAKULAM. 682 014. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.C.M.CHARISMA THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: tss N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = B.A. NO. 3511 OF 2011 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 13th day of May, 2011 O R D E R Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.1149/11 of Ernakulam Central Police Station. It was registered under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. This application is for pre-arrest bail. 2. The material allegations are that the defacto complainant is the owner in possession of 2.080 cents of land and the petitioner suggested that he would give Rs.22 lakhs if the property is alienated to the person suggested by him and also told him that if the sale consideration is deposited in the chit fund run by him he would give Rs.20,000/- per month as interest. But he failed to pay the interest as suggested thereby committed the offence u/s 406 and 420 IPC. 3. I have carefully examined the entire available records and particularly the allegations attributed against the accused. The nature and gravity of the offence, possibility of B.A. NO. 3511 OF 2011 -:2:- the accused to flee from justice and the likelihood of his indulging in commission of similar offences as alleged by the prosecution are also taken note of. Further, the allegation that the accused will terrorize or influence the witnesses and would tamper with the evidence and witnesses and would hamper with the smooth investigation has also been duly considered. In these circumstances, I am not inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to the accused. Hence the request for anticipatory bail is rejected. The petitioner shall surrender before the police on 23.5.2011. The police officer after interrogation will produce the accused before the Magistrate. The Magistrate will dispose of the bail application in accordance with law. Sd/- N.K. BALAKRISHNAN,JUDGE. ul/- [ true copy ] P.A. to Judge.