IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18553 of 2009 1. DHANJIV KUMAR @ MANJEEV KUMAR @ GUDDU 2. Sanjiv Kumar @ Munna Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 28.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Parents and a distant relation of the husband are allowed bail basing the submission made by their counsel that informant was instantly demanding money from his deceased sister. That was the reason for her suicide but that appears false from the postmortem report, as injury was found on person of the deceased that can be made a ground for cancellation of the bail, so granted to co-accused by making wrong submission. Injury on the person of the deceased further belies the claim that there could be no occasion to make any demand, as deceased was married to co-accused Manjeev only after death of her earlier husband, Amit Kumar. Further, I find no substance in the plea of alibi. Taking the direct allegation about petitioners’ presence, the application is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)