R.F.A. No. 2405 of 2008 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.F.A. No. 2405 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.4.2011 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant v. Surinder Kaur .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Sanjay Kaushal, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Sharma,Advocate for Union Territory, Chandigarh . Mr. Sanjay Kumar Advocate for Mr. R. K. Dhiman, Advocate for the land owners. ... Rajesh Bindal J. This order will dispose of R.F.A. Nos. 2405 of 2008, 355, 5047 and 5048 of 2010 and cross objections No. 75-CI of 2008 and 32-CI of 2011, as common questions of facts and laws are involved. The issue involved in the set of appeals and cross objections is regarding valuation of the super structure and the trees existing on the acquired land. Learned Senior Standing Counsel for Union Territory, Chandigarh submitted that in view of the issue pertaining to valuation of super structure existing on the acquired land having been settled by this court in RFA No. 579 of 2006 –Smt. Akko Devi and others v. Union Territory, Chandigarh and another, decided on 1.10.2008 and in R.F.A. No. 2340 of 1998 –Suraj Bhan and others v. Union Territory, Chandigarh, decided on 24.9.2008, he does not press the present appeals. R.F.A. No. 2405 of 2008 [2] As far as fruit bearing trees and non-fruit bearing trees on the acquired land are concerned, the appeals are not pressed on account of binding judgments of this court in RFA No. 3004 of 206 –Surjit Singh v. State of Punjab and another, decided on 2.3.2009. In view of the judgments of this court, learned counsel for the cross-objectors submitted that he does not press the cross-objections filed by the land owners. Accordingly, the appeals as well as the cross objections are dismissed as not pressed. As no one is present in cross objections No. 32-CI of 2011, the same is dismissed in default. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 27.4.2011 mk