1 mca121-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION rpa MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.121 OF 2010 Nirmalal Santosh Patil .. Applicant V/s. Santosh Patangrao Patil .. Respondent ..... Mr. Rajesh More for the applicant. ..... CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : APRIL 21, 2011. P.C.:­ Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Notice for final disposal was issued on 27th October, 2010. Office noting shows that notice is duly served. 2. Applicant is wife of the respondent. Applicant is resident of Karad, District Satara. The respondent is the resident of Pune. The respondent has filed a petition for divorce in the Family Court at Pune. The prayer is for transfer of the said petition to the Court at Karad. It is pointed out that in 2005, a petition for divorce was filed by the respondent in the Family Court at Pune which was dismissed 2 mca121-10 and by Judgment and order dated 25th August, 2010, the Division Bench has upheld the decree of dismissal. He pointed out that in July 2010, the present petition was filed. 3. In paragraph 11 of the application, the applicant has stated that it is not possible for the applicant to travel from Karad to Pune for attending the petition filed by the respondent. Various factual averments made in the paragraph 11 are not disputed by the applicant by filing any reply. The averments made in the application make out a case for passing order of transfer. 4. Accordingly, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). JUDGE