1` IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application (CAW) No. 2190/2009 in Writ Petition No. 504/2006 Arya Vidya Sabha, Jaripatka, Nagpur- 14, through its President and another vs. Smt. Shashikala Naidu and another.. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. CORAM : A.P.Lavande, J DATE : 15.01.2010 Heard Mr. Marpakwar, learned counsel for the applicants, Mr. P.D.Meghe, learned counsel for respondent no.1 and Mr. T.A.Mirza, learned A.P.P. for respondent no.2. 2. By this application the applicants seek modification of the order dated 28.7.2008 by which this Court granted reinstatement of the respondent no.1 with effect from 2.8.2008. There is no dispute that the respondent no.1 has joined her services as peon with petitioner no.2 College on 5.8.2008. According to Mr. Marpakwar, thereafter on several occasions the respondent no.1 remained absent without any sufficient cause on account of which she has been suspended. 3. Mr. Marpakwar submits that since respondent no.1 has remained absent on several occasions interim 2` relief granted by this court deserves to be modified. 4. The prayer made by Mr. Marpakwar has been opposed by Mr. Meghe, learned counsel for respondent no.1 on the ground that the reasons given by the petitioners for modification of the interim order are not germane for modification of the interim order granted by this Court. 5. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties I am of the considered opinion that no case has been made out for modification of the order dated 28.7.2008. By the said order dated 28.7.2008 the petitioners have been directed to reinstate respondent no.1 in terms of the order passed by the College Tribunal. The respondent no.1 has been suspended by the petitioners after passing of the interim order. Therefore, the question of modification of the order dated 28.7.2008 does not arise. In the result, therefore, no case is made out for modification of the order dated 28.7.2008. The application is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE patle 3`