1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7942 OF 2008 Dr.Kailas Rameshwar Jaju. ..Petitioner. V/s. Sau.Kaplia Kailas Jaju. ..Respondent. Mr.Rahul Walvekar i/b.S.R.Ganbavale for petitioner. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : JANUARY 5, 2009. DATE : JANUARY 5, 2009. DATE : JANUARY 5, 2009. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard Counsel for the Petitioner. 2. No case for interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction is warranted in the fact situation of the present case. I am in agreement with the opinion expressed by the trial Court as recorded in paragraph-2 of the impugned Order that the application for amendment was filed at belated stage and would cause prejudice to the otherside. Hence rejected. 3. At this stage, Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the documents on which the Petitioner seeks to rely may be ordered to be taken on record by the Court. That is not the purport of the present 2 application. Application was limited for the relief of amendment of the pleadings. The Petitioner will be free to move the trial Court for further relief, who in turn shall consider the request of the Petitioner on its own merits in accordance with the law. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J)