1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5477/2010 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is original plaintiff of suit bearing RCS No.17/2008. He filed a list of witnesses (Exh.43/C) wherein he mentioned name of Assistant Charity Commissioner and other public authorities. He applied for issuance of summons to the Assistant Charity Commissioner. It is contended that since a dispute was pending about the same property before the Assistant Charity Commissioner in the past, the examination of said witness was necessary. It is contended that the impugned order, rejecting the 2 application of the petitioner, is improper and perverse. I do not agree. The petitioner is at liberty to collect certified copies of the public documents pertaining to the inquiry before the Assistant Charity Commissioner. The examination of the Assistant Charity Commissioner, who is a quasi judicial authority, is not necessary and the purpose of such examination is not properly described nor summoning the witness only because of earlier pendency of certain inquiry is permissible. Hence, the petition is dismissed. (V. R. KINGAONKAR , J) Dt/- 12.07.2010 ndk/c1271035