1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 10090 of 2008. Date of Decision: 9th December, 2010. Jaisi Ram …..Petitioner. Versus State of HP and others …..Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner: None. For the Respondents: Mr. P. M. Negi, Dy. A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assist. Advocate General Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral). The petitioner was appointed on daily wage basis in the year 1981. He had worked continuously till 1993 and had completed 240 days in each calendar year. He was not conferred work charge status immediately after completion of 10 years, since he could not produce date of birth certificate and medical certificate in the year 1994. However, he has produced the date of birth certificate on 26.10.1997. 2. The validity of the certificate issued by the Secretary, Nagar Panchayat Sarkaghat was doubted by the respondents. However, the fact of the matter is that petitioner has completed requisite number of years with 240 days in each calendar year. He ought to have been conferred work charge status by the respondent- State and one more opportunity also ought to have been given to him to produce date of birth certificate and medical certificate and if he 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 failed to do so, his case was required to be considered as per policy of the State of Himachal Pradesh for regularization of the daily wage worker. 3. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to grant the petitioner one more opportunity to produce medical certificate, date of birth certificate and thereafter consider his case in view of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972. Needful shall be done within a period of two months from today. No costs. ( Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 9, 2010 (Jai)