IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH OCTOBER 2010 / 28TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 9962 of 2006(J) -------------------------------- OA.467/2002 of DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM .................... PETITIONER(S): ------------------ 1. GEEGEES HARDWARES, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SALIM MATHEW, AGED 51, S/O. MATHEW JOHN,527,THEVARPARAMBIL HOUSE 5TH LANE, DERSHAN NAGAR, TRIVANDRUM-5. 2. SALIM MATHEW, AGED 51, S/O. MATHEW JOHN, 527, THEVARPARAMBIL HOUSE, 5TH LANE, DERSHAN NAGAR, TRIVANDRUM-5. BY ADVS. SRI.ANIL GEORGE SRI.PAUL MATHEW (PERUMPILLIL) RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. LORD KRISHNA BANK LTD., TRIVANDRUM. 2. RECOVERY OFFICER, DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM. R1 BY ADV. SRI.B.JAYASANKAR S.B.PREMACHANDRA PRABHU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: SVS/ C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J --------------------------- W.P(C) No.9962 of 2006 ---------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of October, 2010. J U D G M E N T Learned counsel for the petitioner informed that the submission made on 23.6.2006 to the effect that the petitioner had deposited a sum of Rs.10,00,000/-, was not correct. 2. It is further stated that the petitioner has not turn up to instruct the counsel inspite of sending notices on repeated occasions. Learned counsel appearing for the first respondent submitted that the prayer in this writ petition is only for restraining recovery steps till the disposal of appeal, which was pending before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai. But the said Tribunal had already disposed of the appeal. Therefore the issue involved has become infructuous, is the submission. Considering the above circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- C.K.ABDUL REHIM JUDGE ab //True Copy//