IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY MONDAY, THE 28TH MARCH 2011 / 7TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 33716 of 2007(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER:- ------------------ LISSY, W/O.PAILY, NEDUMPULLITHARA VEEDU, WARD BI.1, EZUPUNN P.O., EZHUPUNNA PANCHAYATH, ALAPPUZHA DIST. BY ADV. SRI.B.S.SURESH (CHIRAKKARA) RESPONDENTS:- --------------------- 1. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE ALAPPUZHA. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AROOR. 3. DAWN JACOB VARGHESE, PROPRITOR, ORIENTAL FRIGHT LILNES, W.ISLAND, KOCHI. GOVT. PLEADER SRI.SABU SREEDHARAN FOR R1 & R2. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 33716 of 2007(L) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- P1: COPY OF THE ADVOCATE'S NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE FRIENDS OF THE DECEASED SON OF THE PETITIONER DATED 21..8..2007. P2: COPY OF THE F.I.R. NO.327/07 DATED 15..8..2007. P3: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 12.10.2007. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL. ( TRUE COPY ) P.A. TO JUDGE. Kvs/- BHABANI PRASAD RAY, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No.33716 of 2007-L. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 28th March, 2011. J U D G M E N T Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. 2. The prayer in the writ petition is to direct the first respondent to depute another agency for investigating on Ext.P3 complaint. I have gone through the statement filed by the second respondent Sub Inspector of Police, Aroor Police Station. It appears that a report was submitted to SDM, Alappuzha on 11.10.2007 under Section 174 Crl.P.C. and notices were given to the defacto complainant and that was accepted by the learned Magistrate. In that view of the matter no relief can be granted to the petitioner. It is open to the petitioner to file protest petition if permissible under law. Writ petition is therefore closed. BHABANI PRASAD RAY, (Judge) Kvs/-