31 aw/f IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (c.G) w.P. s No. £9 2011 Ramavtar Sonwani, aged about 54 years, S/o Shri Budana Sonwani, Assistant .Block Education Officer, Pendra, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Surendra Singh, aged about 48 years, S/o Shri Shivpoojan ‘Head W / 1: Singh, Master, Government Multipurpose higher Secondary Schooi Pendra, Biock Pendra Distt. Biiaspur (C.G.) Smt. Aabha Singh aged about 47 years, W/o Shri Surendra Singh, Lecturer, Mishri Devi Government Girls Higher Secondary School Pendra Road, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Secretary, Tribai Welfare Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) The Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Ravi . Shanker Shukla University Campus, Raipur (C.G.) M PETITIONERS @ Director Public Instructions, Raipur (C.G.) The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Bilaspur (C.G.) The District Education Officer, Bilaspurl(C.G.) The Block Education Officer, Pendra road, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) The Collector, Bilaspur (C.G.) Principal, Mishri Devi Government Girls Higher Secondary School Pendra Road, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHA'FI‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 694 of2011 PETITIONER : Ramavtar Sonwani & Others. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CON STITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agmhotri, J. Present: Shri H.B.Agrawal, Senior Advocate with J.K.Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 23' day of February, 201 l) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a nesh petition, on the ground’that subsequent development has taken place. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side has no obj ection. 3. It is ordered accordingly. 4. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. If cause of action has arisen subsequently, no liberty is required to challenge the same. Sd/—' Satish K. Agnihotri Judge