IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24774 of 2010 DADHIWAL RAM DHARHI @ DADHWAL DHANSHI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 29.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. Admittedly, petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. nor anything has been recovered from his conscious possession. It transpires from the case diary as well as impugned order of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ist, that except the confessional statement of co-accused there is nothing against the petitioner. As per submission of learned counsel for petitioner, the investigation has already been completed and co-accused, who is named in F.I.R. has been granted privilege of bail. So far as criminal antecedent of the petitioner is concerned, it has been reported by S.P., Rural, Patna vide memo no.1952 dated 08.09.2010 that except the Ghoswari P.S. Case no.59 of 2006, there is no criminal antecedent of the petitioner. 2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and submissions of the parties petitioner, namely, Dadhiwal Ram Dharhi @ Dadhwal Dhanshi, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Barh, Patna, in connection with Ghoswari P.S. Case no.59 of 2006, subject to condition that one of the sureties must be close relative of the petitioner. PN ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)