IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL P.I.L. Writ Petition No. 324 of 2006 (M/B) Mangal Singh Chauhan s/o Sri P.S. Chauhan, Advocate, Uttaranchal High Court (in person) …….. Petitioner Versus The Secretary, Madhyamik Siksha Parishad, Uttaranchal Board, Ramnagar, District Nainital and another. ……..Respondents Petitioner in person. Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Petitioner in person. 2. Admittedly, the petitioner has not made any representation to the respondents for the redressal of his grievance projected in the petition. 3. In our opinion, it would be appropriate for the petitioner to first approach the respondents for the redressal of his grievance. 4. With the above observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. (M.M. Ghildiyal, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 24.03.2006 24.03.2006 A