£‘w‘n w w hmgs'g-g.‘ Ea) C§tm‘7/. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTIGARH w.P(.“No. s) 3 3 g12007 PETITIONERir‘gk‘Qx {x' Smt. Manisha Shukla W/o Shri Shailendra Shukla, Aged about 42 years Working as Lecturer in Govt. Higher Secondary Multipurpose School Durg Distt. ~\' Durg [C.G.] VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department of School Education, Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur [C.G.] District Education Officer, H . District Durg [C.G.] / RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226(227 OF THE W ONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS r§ C @ H16H COURT g CHHATTI56ARH AT BILASRR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. $ATI5H K‘ AgNIHOTRL J, WRIT PETITION (5,) No.388 OF 2007 Pai-rioner : Smf. Mnnisha Shukln versus Respondenfs : 51m: of amhamsgarh and another Prcsenf : Mr. Manish Upadhyuy, counsa! for the pefi'rioners. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel lawyer- for fhe wondeMs/S'tnh. O R D E R (Passed on this 23" Day of January, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for fhe pefifioner as well as for the Sfafe/respondenfs jain'l'ly submit fha-r fhe facts, md question of law involved in 'H1e pmsenf wrif pe'rifion are squarely covered by 'rhe decision of this CouM' in the ms? of Vasluvonr (ulnar Bhcmdwqi vs. Mimi corporation; Dug 9M amflml 2. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of yadnmnf Mar B/mraww' (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired 8.Ed. Certifioate at his own ewenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri i —- um— Judge 1 2006(II)MPJM595 ,7 i i i i