2.i.ca.4109.09 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4109 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1541 OF 2009 Kashibai Shamrao Shinde and 2 others. ..Applicants. Versus Vijay Pandurang Shinde and another. ..Respondents. ... Mr.M.S. Kumathekar, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr.H.R. Pawar, Advocate for the Respondents. ... CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATED : 4TH DECEMBER, 2009 P.C. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. Present Civil Application is preferred by the original plaintiffs for stay of execution and implementation of the order dated 27th August, 2009 passed by the trial Court in S.C. Suit No. 1440 of 2001 and for continuing the order passed in Notice of Motion No.1194 of 2001 dated 15th March, 2001. 2.i.ca.4109.09 2 3. In any case, the copy of the order dated 15th March, 2001 passed by the trial Court in Notice of Motion No.1194 of 2001 is not annexed to the Civil Application. At the time of hearing also, the copy of the said order is not produced. It is case of the applicants/orig.plaintiffs that they are in exclusive possession of the suit premises, but, the said contention is rejected by the trial Court. The trial Court specifically observed in para-17 of the impugned judgment dated 27th August, 2009 that the plaintiffs as well as defendants are in joint possession of the suit premises and the defendants are occupying outer room. Considering these facts, Civil Application is dismissed. 4. Learned Counsel appearing for the applicants requested for maintaining status-quo for further eight weeks. Considering the observations of the trial Court in para-17, the said request is rejected. (K.K.TATED, J.)