IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.21925 of 2011 Date of Decision : November 26, 2011. Vipasha .....Petitioner versus Punjab Technical University, Jalandhar and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Ms.Veena Kumari, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner got admission in respondent No.2-College in MBA Course in August, 2007. After completing first and second semesters, she was permitted to appear in the third semester. The petitioner appeared in all the papers of third semester examination held in November- December, 2008, but in the result declared in May, 2009, she was shown to be “absent” in one of the papers which she had not even opted, though she appeared in all the five papers opted by her. The petitioner's case is that she was shown 'absent' due to sheer negligence of respondent No.2-Institute as the name of some other student was mentioned in place of the petitioner while sending her internal CWP No.21925 of 2011 [2] assessment to the University-respondent No.1. The petitioner represented the respondents and has also served them with a legal notice dated 1.10.2011 (Annexure P-8) but it is alleged that the mistake noticed above is not being rectified nor her result of third semester is being declared after carrying out the necessary correction. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the considered view that if the allegations made by the petitioner were true, it is imperative upon the respondents to carry out the necessary correction and declare the petitioner's result of third semester MBA Course in all the five papers in which she is said to have appeared. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of at this stage, however, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's claim, with a direction to the Registrar/Controller of the Examinations, Punjab Technical University, Jalandhar to immediately verify the petitioner's claim and do the needful within a period of two weeks from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. In case the University-respondent reaches at a different conclusion, that will also be conveyed to the petitioner within a period of one week thereafter. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. November 26, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE