-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1360 OF 2010 Balasaheb Arjun Magar & Ors. ..Appellants. Versus Balasaheb D. Kadam & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr. P. S. Dani for the appellants. Mr. Ajay Joshi for R-1 to 3. Mr. J. S. Yadav for R-4. Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : September 9, 2011. P. C. : 1. Not on board. Mentioned for production. Production was granted. The parties settled their dispute amicably and have filed consent terms dated 9/9/2011. The consent terms are signed by the appellants and respondents alongwith their respective advocates. The appellants and the respondents are present before the Court. They admit contents of the consent terms. Consent terms are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. First Appeal is disposed in terms of consent terms. 2. The appellants are entitled for refund of Court fees as per the Rules. 3. In view of the disposal of the appeal, nothing survives for consideration in Civil Applications taken out in this Appeal and same stands disposed of. (RANJIT MORE, J.) srp -: 2 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3864 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1360 OF 2010 Balasaheb Arjun Magar & Ors. ..Applicants/Appellants. Versus Balasaheb D. Kadam & Anr. ..Respondents. AND Anil Balasaheb Kadam & Anr. ..Proposed respondents. Mr. P. S. Dani for the appellants. Mr. Ajay Joshi for R-1 & 2 and proposed R-3. Mr. J. S. Yadav for proposed R-4. Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : September 9, 2011. P. C. : 1. Not on board. Mentioned for production. Production was granted. 2. By consent of learned counsel for the respective parties, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Necessary amendment be carried out forthwith. (RANJIT MORE, J.) srp