IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:- THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI FRIDAY, THE 23RD MAY 2008 / 2ND JYAISHTA 1930 Cont.Case (C).No.728 of 2007(S) ----------------------------------------------------------------- ARISING OUT OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.31175/2004 DATED 08/02/2005 .................... PETITIONER:- -------------------- V. HASSAN, S/O. VEERANKUTTY HAJI, AGED 55 YEARS, ERINKANNCHERI HOUSE, MUKKAM P.O., KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.C.VIVEK. RESPONDENTS:- ------------------------ 1. RAGHAVAN, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER). THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THAMARASSERY, KOZHIKODE 2. KUNJUMOIDEEN KUTTY, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER). THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUKKAM, KOZHIKODE 3. E.A. BABU, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER). THE MUKKAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MUKKAM 4. K.M. MOOSA, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER). THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE 5. JOSE MATHEW, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER). THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, K.S.R.T.C., KOZHIKODE R1, R2 & R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.P.SREEKRISHNAN. R3 BY SRI.V.V.SURENDRAN & SRI.P.A.HARISH R5 BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.K.PRABHAKARAN. THIS CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.Dattu,C.J. & M.C.Hari Rani,J. ----------------------------------------------------------- Cont. Case (C).No.728 of 2007-S ------------------------------------------------------------ Dated, this the 23rd day of May, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu,C.J. After hearing Sri.M.P.Sreekrishnan, learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1, 2 and 4, we are of the opinion that there is substantial compliance with the orders and directions issued by this Court in W.P.(C).No.31175 of 2004 dated 8.2.2005. Therefore, we need not have to proceed with this contempt proceedings. Accordingly, the contempt proceedings are dropped. 2. In view of the orders passed in the contempt petition, no orders need be passed in I.A.Nos.432 of 2007 and 32 of 2008. Accordingly, the said applications are rejected. Ordered accordingly. H.L.Dattu Chief Justice M.C.Hari Rani Judge vku/-