WP(C) 4271/2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. HRA Choudhury, learned Sr. Counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. B. Dutta, learned counsel, representing the respondents No. 3 and 4. I have also heard Ms. M. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel, Education Departme nt. This writ petition has been filed making a grievance against the appointment of the respondent No. 5, which is stated to be for 89 days. In the counter affidavit filed by the respondents No. 3 and 4, it has been stated in pa ragraph 15 that the appointment in favour of the respondent No. 5 has already ex pired and he is no longer in service. In view of the above, nothing survives in the writ petition and accordingly the writ petition is disposed of.