1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.2236 OF 2002 Shri Hiralal Berudas Chuttar : Petitioner V/s. Smt.Tarabai Damodar Gaikwad (Dismissed as per Court’s order dated 13.6.2002) & Ors. : Respondents ... Mr.M.V.Sali for the petitioner. Mr.G.S.Godbole for the respondent no.5. ... WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2226 OF 2002 Shri Hiralal Berudas Chuttar : Petitioner V/s. Smt.Vanabai Sonu Sonavane, since deceased by her heirs and legal representatives, viz: 1a) Bhika Sonu Sonawane & Ors. : Respondents ... Mr.M.V.Sali for the petitioner. Mr.G.S.Godbole for respondent no.7. ... CORAM : S.A. BOBDE, J. 2 June 30, 2005. P.C.: 1. The petitioner in Writ Petition no.2236 of 2002 has challenged the order of the Maharashtra Revenue tribunal dated 23.10.2001 dismissing his revision application. Suo moto proceedings were initiated under section 84C of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act in respect of certain transaction between Sonawane and the petitioner. The petitioner claims to have pruchased the land. However, it has been found that the agricultural land in question is in possession of the petitioner and the petitioner is not an agriculturist. There is no infirmity, jurisdictional or otherwise in this finding of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal. In the circumstances, there is no merit in Writ Petition no.2236 of 2002 which is hereby dismissed. 2. In view of the dismissal of Writ Petition no.2236 of 2002, Writ Petition no.2226 of 2002 preferred against similar order and based on similar facts and reasons is also hereby dismissed. 3. In view of the dismissal of the Writ Petitions, Civil Application nos.727 of 2002, 724 of 2002, 2470 of 2002 and 2471 of 2002 stand disposed of. Sd/- 3 S.A. BOBDE, J.