IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.W.P. No. 1481 of 2007. Decided on 23rd November, 2010. Vijay Parkash & others. ….Petitioners. Versus State of HP & anr …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the Petitioners: Mr. Dhruv Shaunak, Advocate, vice counsel for the petitioners. For Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. AG, for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Vikram Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.4. Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.5. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners are aggrieved by the selection and appointment of respondents No.5 and 6. In the nature of the factual dispute in this case, it will be appropriate if the petitioners are relegated to pursue their remedy before the second respondent. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of as follows: 2. In the event of the petitioners approaching the second respondent within a period of two months from today, the matter will be looked into by the said authority with notice to the petitioners and the contesting respondents and appropriate orders in that regard shall be passed within another three months from 2 the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner concerned. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 23rd November, 2010. ( Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tr) Judge