IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14443 of 2010 1. AJAY KUMAR S/O SRI KANHAIYA THAKUR R/O VILL JAGA PAKAR, P.O.JAGA PAKAR, P.S. HARSIDDHI, DISTT-EAST CHAMPARAN 2. RITESH RANJAN S/O TARKESHWAR THAKUR R/O VILL JAGA PAKAR, P.O.JAGA PAKAR, P.S. HARSIDDHI, DISTT-EAST CHAMPARAN 3. RINKI KUMARI @ RINKI DEVI D/O MAHATAM CHAUDHUR R/O VILL JAGA PAKAR, P.O.JAGA PAKAR, P.S. HARSIDDHI, DISTT-EAST CHAMPARAN Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION MOTIHARI, EAST CHAMPARAN. 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER SANGRAMPUR BLOCK, EAST CHAMPARAN. 6. THE MUKHIYA GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ WEST MADHUBANI ,BLOCK -SANGRAMPUR, DISTT-EAST CHAMPARAN. 7. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ WEST MADHUBANI , BLOCK -SANGRAMPUR, DISTT-EAST CHAMPARAN. 8. THE MEMBER THE DISTRICT TEACHER EMPLOYMENT APPELLATE AUTHORITY EAST CHAMPARAN. ---------------------------- 2. 25.04.2011 There are three petitioners before this Court. This is an application for quashing the order dated 9.8.2010 passed by the District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, East Champaran in case no. 283 of 2008. By virtue of this order the claim of the petitioners for inclusion of their names in the merit list/ selection list for appointment on the post of Panchayat teachers stands rejected on the ground that the petitioners have obtained certificate from Nababharat Shiksha Parishad, Orissa which is neither recognized by the State of 2 Bihar nor recognized by the National Council for Teachers Education. The 2006 Rules purportedly framed by the State of Bihar lays down the basic requirement with regard to the eligibility for appointment on the post. The State Government has also notified the Institutions whose degrees are not even recognized for such purpose. Petitioners’ case were recommended for verification and the so called Institution that is Nababharat Shiksha Parishad, Orissa does not figure as an Institution which is recognized as such or their degree is recognized by the State of Bihar. That is the reason why the Appellate Authority has rejected the claim of these petitioners which cannot be said to be faulty. The Court granted indulgence to the petitioners to produce impartial evidence with regard to authenticity of the Institution or the validity of their degree based on which they would acquire right for appointment but except a down load from the site of the Institution which does not reflect much light on the issue, there is nothing to substantiate the claim of the petitioners which would in any manner compel the Court to interfere with the finding given by the Appellate Authority. 3 The Appellate Authority has done no wrong and in view of the same no interference is required by this Court with the impugned order. This writ application is dismissed. Anand Kr. ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)