IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD Dated this the 19th day of April, 2011 Present: The Hon’ble Sri Justice N. Ravi Shankar Crl.P.No. 3414 of 2011 Between: Pothula Laxmi Srinivasa Rao ..Petitioner And Ruthala Laxmi and another. ..Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR Crl.P.No. 3414 of 2011 Order: The petitioner herein is the 8th accused in C.C.No. 247 of 2009 on the file of the court of Judicial Magistrate of First class, Narsipatnam, Visakhapatnam District. He filed this petition for quashing the said criminal case in so far as he is concerned. 2. The offences alleged are those punishable under sections 323, 379 read with 34 IPC. Smt T.V.Sridevi, learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the FIR does not disclose the name of the petitioner, that even S.161 Cr.P.C. statements of the complainant and other witnesses show that only bald allegations are made against the petitioner and therefore the case against him should be quashed. It is true that the de facto complainant did not mention his name, but her husband, it is seen, stated about the role of this petitioner also and his statement is to the effect that he instigated the other accused to attack him. Thus it can be said that the allegations in the charge sheet do disclose the offences against him. The question whether the petitioner has been falsely implicated and whether there are any other reasons to disbelieve the prosecution version against him are all questions of fact which have to be decided by the trial court either in the enquiry preceding framing of charges or in the trial which may be taken up thereafter, but not in this petition. Accordingly this petition is dismissed. _____________________ N. RAVI SHANKAR, J. Dated: 19—04—2011. *BVS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR Crl.P.No. 3395 of 2011 19—4-2011