IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3737 of 2010 SATYADEO SINGH S/O LATE RAMAYAN SINGH R/O VILLAGE - RAJRASAN, P.O.- MANDAMUNJ (CHAINPUR) DISTRICT—SIWAN ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF ROAD CONSTRUCTION, GOVT. OF BIHAR,PATNA. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, CENTRAL DESIGN ORGANISATION, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, PATNA. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, ROAD DIVISION NO. 2, MUZAFFARPUR. 4. THE PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, BIHAR, PATNA. 5. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 10.3.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State as also the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon the death of his father, who was working as an employee under respondent no.3, the retiral dues have still remained to be settled. Learned counsel for the State submits that on perusal of letter no.487 dated 26.5.2006, as contained in Annexure 6, issued by respondent no.3, it would appear that the petitioner was required to submit the requisite documents for disposal of his claims. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as raised in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a representation before the Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road Division No.2, Muzaffarpur (respondent no.3) annexing the relevant documents, including the documents as required in terms of the aforesaid letter contained in Annexure 6. In case such a 2 representation is filed stating the details of his claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, respondent no.3 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation and dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner raised in his representation could be redressed and the admissible dues, if any, could also be paid without further delay. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)