^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGASH AT BILASPUR PETmONER RESPONDENTS ,.i?. ^i*. i II WMTPETITION (S') No. 3314 of2008 PraUad Kumar SahuS/o. Shri Bodhiram Sahu, aged about - 35 yeacs, R/o Village Saricho Tah: Janjgh-- ChampaDistt. Janjgir-Champa (CT©.) VERSUS ! • . -. : 1. Chairman, Coal India Ltd. 10. Netaji Subhash Road, Koikata(WB.) 2. Director (P. & IR) Coal India Ltd., 10 Netaji Subhash Road;Kolkata (W.B.) 3. Member8ecretary,IBCC-VI(JomtBipartitefort}ie Coa! Industry), Coal India Ltd. 10, Netaji Subhash Road, KoKata (W.B.) . 4. ChairmaH-cuia-Maaaguig Director, S.E.C.L. Head Qtr, Seepat Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. Chief Genera! Manager, S.E.C.L. Area Korba Diti. K.orba(C.G.) WKiT PETITION UNDER AR'HCLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUnON OF INDIA SB: Hon'Ue Sihri Satish K. Aemhotri, J. Present: Shri RahulMishra,AdvocatefQrfhepetitioner. Shri Vivek Sfarivastava, Adyocate appearing on behalfof Shri Praveen Das, Advocate for the respondentNo. 4arid 5. ORALORDER (Passedon 10th dayof July, 2008) 1. With the eonsent ofthe parties, the matter is taken up for hearing fmally, 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner subnaits that fhe petitioner is sinMlarlysituatedtotfaatof'therespondentsmfhematterofCAarmian, Central CcwlfieSds Ltd. & Others Vs. JivendraPrasadTi'wari & Others (CivilAppeal No. 1714 of2(?Q7). Learned counsefiurther submits that the said Civil Appeal has been disposed ofvide order dated 29 March, 2007, passedbythe Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. Leamed counsel farther subnMtslhat this case may also be disposed of in the same terms. There is no opposition by leamed counsel fbrthe respondeiut No. 4 and 5. 3. In view ofthe above, the petitioa stands disposed ofin the same tenns, subject to verification ofthe fa.ets.No order asto costs. __———— " . ; : . ..' . i Sd/- > ^ Sadsh K. AgniUotri Judge