IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5555 of 2010 SURENDRA PRASAD . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02/ 23/02/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The defence in a police case under Sections-25(1-b)A and 26 of the Arms Act is of false implication. The F.I.R. states that he is a convict who has already undergone a sentence when a country made loaded pistol is alleged to have been recovered from him. Considering the period of custody since 4.6.2009 and his previous conviction, any application for regular bail on his behalf after he completes one year in custody shall be considered by the court below on its own merits, without being prejudiced by the present order. The present application is rejected at this stage. KC/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)