IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 14766 of 1999 Between: K.Subramanyam S/o.Kailash R/o. 11-1-574, Mylarguda, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Labour Court-III, rep by its Presiding Officer, Chandravihar Buildings, M.J.Road, Hyderabad. 2 The H.M.T.Bearing Ltd. rep by its General Manager, Maula-Ali, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari and quash the order made in M.P. No.54 of 1994, dated.30.12.1996 on the file of the 1st Respondent in dismissing the petition under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, .1947, Claiming monetary benefits of Rs.26,437/- and only suggesting the 2nd respondent to show humanitarian consideration as arbitrary, illegal, unjust, contrary to law, perverse, contrary to evidence, material on record and also violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the constitution of India; and pass such other order or orders as deemed fit and proper under the circusmtances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.P.SRIDHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents : MR.(SC FOR H.M.T. LTD)K.CHINA BABU The Court made the following : ORDER : It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for Petitioner Sri S.Anil Kumar, representing Sri P.Sridhar Rao, counsel on record, that the petitioner had already taken the bundle from them. There is no appearance by any other counsel, on behalf of petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 26th February 2009. ajr