IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN FRIDAY, THE 15TH JULY 2011 / 24TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 19220 of 2011(B) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. MOHAMMED FAIZAL N.V., S/O.ABDUL NASEER, AGED 21 YEARS, FAIZAL MANZIL, PIRAYIRI PO, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. RASHID A., ALANGATHIL HOUSE, ERACHIMANGAD PO, NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.C.R.SARADAMANI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE UNIVERISITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY PO, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 673635. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERISITY OF CALICUT, OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY PO, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 673635. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- WP(C).No. 19220 of 2011(B) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 18-6-2011. EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 18-6-2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS - NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mn P.N. RAVINDRAN, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.19220 of 2011 ------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioners underwent the B.Tech. degree course in Mechanical Engineering from Nehru College of Engineering and Research Center, Pampady, a college affiliated to the Calicut University. They appeared for the Supplementary VI semester B.Tech degree Examinations held in June, 2010. The results were published in the first week of June, 2011. The petitioners again failed in different papers. They have therefore applied for revaluation of their answer script by submitting the originals of Exts.P1 & P2 applications dated 18.6.2011. The petitioners submit that they had done well in the examinations and that if their answer scripts are revalued, they are sure to secure a pass in the said subjects. It is submitted that in such circumstances, unless their answer scripts are expeditiously revalued, they will be put to serious prejudice. In this writ petition the petitioners seek a direction to the respondents to expeditiously revalue their answer script and to publish the result. 2. Sri.Santhosh Mathew, learned standing counsel appearing for the Calicut University, submitted that if the petitioners' applications for revaluation are in order and the requisite fee has been W.P.(C) No.19220 of 2011 2 paid, the University will take steps to expeditiously revalue their answer scripts and to communicate the results to them. In the light of the said submission I dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents to take steps to have the answer script of the petitioners described in Exts.P1 and P2 applications revalued and to publish the results expeditiously and in any event within six weeks from the date on which the petitioners produce a certified copy of this judgment before the second respondent. P.N. RAVINDRAN, JUDGE. nj.