hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL (L) NO. 266 OF 2010 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3651 OF 2009 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 194 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 2989 OF 2008 Geetanjali Minhas ... Appellant Versus Rishi Minhas and anr. ... Respondents Mr. Jai Chinoy, Sr. Counsel with Ms. Astha Tamhankar withi Ms. Kainaz Irani i/by Mr. Rajesh Chaurasia for Appellants. Respondent No. 1 present in person. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.V. MORE, JJ. DATED : JUNE 09, 2010 P. C.: Respondent No. 1 present in person. In view of the order to be passed, notice on Respondent No. 2 dispensed with. By the present appeal, appellants seek to impugn the order dated 23.3.2010 whereby the learned Judge allowed Notice of Motion No. 3651 of 2009 holding that Notice of Motion No. 194 of 2009 was heard exparte without notice to Respondent No. 1 herein. Considering the controversy, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order subject to the following directions : (1)Respondent No. 1 during the pendency of the motion will not alienate, transfer or create any third party rights in respect of the suit premises. (2)Respondent No. 1 will not interfere with the joint possession of the appellants herein as also not obstruct his mother in residing in premises if she comes to reside therein. (3)The learned trial Judge requested to dispose of the motion at the earliest. Appeal accordingly disposed off. (R.V. MORE,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)