HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.6452 of 2010 29th March 2010 Between: M/s. Sri Sai Constructions Company, rep. by its Partner M.Ram Kishore … PETITIONER(S) and The Executive Engineer, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Uppal Circle, Hyderabad and another … RESPONDENT(S) HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.6452 of 2010 ORDER: Heard Sri S.Surender Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri R.Ramachandra Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent-Corporation. At their request the writ petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission. The relief sought for in this writ petition is for a direction to the respondents not to entrust the works to the contractors who do not fulfill the conditions stipulated in the tender. The petitioner also participated in the tender process. It is their case that while they submitted the documents required to be furnished along with the documents, several other persons who submitted tenders did not do so. Apprehending that the respondents may entrust the works to such of those who did not submit the documents as stipulated in the tender notification and in the tender conditions, the petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court. Sri R.Ramachandra Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-Corporation, on instructions, would submit that the bids were opened on 17.03.2010; the successful bidders were intimated through E-mail to submit the original documents along with TIN number, IT returns, Audit reports, EMD, etc., on or before 23.03.2010 for taking tender approval from the Zonal Commissioner, East Zone, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, and some of the lowest bidders were yet to submit the hard copies for verification and, as at present, the tenders have not yet been finalized. Learned Standing Counsel would submit that the respondent- Corporation would strictly adhere to the tender conditions and award works only to such of those who fulfilled the tender conditions and had submitted the documents required to be submitted along with the tender. In view of the submission now made by the Learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-Corporation, the cause in the writ petition does not necessitate adjudication. The writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent-Corporation to strictly adhere to the tender conditions and entrust works only to such of those tenderers who have complied with the conditions prescribed both in the tender notifications and in the tender conditions. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. However, in the circumstances, without costs. _____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J 29th March 2010 CVRK Note : Issue copy by one week. B/o CVRK/ASP