1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICMTURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 5342 of 2008 Union of India and ors v. Pravin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr R.G. Agrawal, Adv for petitioners. Coram : D.D. Sinha and A.P. Bhangale, JJ Dated : 14th January 2009 1. Heard Mr R.G. Agrawal, learned counsel for petitioners. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 28th March 2008 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal whereby Original Application of respondent against the imposition of minor punishment by the petitioner came to be allowed. 2. Considered the contentions canvassed by learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the impugned order. Perusal of the impugned order shows that though it was claimed by the Department that the respondent was orally directed to attend Loco 27371, however, there is neither evidence of such 2 oral instructions nor the oral instructions have been substantiated by the petitioners herein in any manner. In such situation, finding recorded by the Tribunal in this regard needs no interference. Hence, writ petition is dismissed. Judge. Judge. hsj