SCA/10305/2003 1/3 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 10305 of 2003 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? NO 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? NO 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? NO 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? NO 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? NO ========================================================= SOBHNABEN WD/O. AMARSINGH BHATTI & 1 - Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 2 - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MR NIRAL R MEHTA for Petitioner(s) : 1 - 2. MR AJ DESAI, AGP for Respondent(s) : 1 - 2. MR RN SHAH for Respondent(s) : 3, ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI Date : 08/10/2007 ORAL JUDGMENT SCA/10305/2003 2/3 JUDGMENT 1. Heard Mr.Niral Mehta, learned advocate for the petitioners, Mr.A.J. Desai, learned AGP for the respondents No.1 and 2 and Mr.R.N. Shah, learned advocate for the respondent No.3 Municipality. 2. Mr.Niral Mehta, learned advocate for the petitioners has placed on record a communication dated 4.10.2007 addressed by the petitioners to the learned advocate stating that, in view of the resolution dated 12.3.2004 passed by the Dahod Nagarpalika whereby the Nagarpalika has allotted Final Plot to the petitioners in their original plot, they do not desire to press the present petition, and have accordingly, requested him to withdraw the same. The learned advocate has also placed on record a copy of Resolution No.253 dated 12.3.2004 passed by the Dahod Nagarpalika. 3. The letter dated 4.10.2007 as well as Resolution No.253 dated 12.3.2004 passed by the Dahod Nagarpalika are taken on the record of the case. 4. In view of the aforesaid, the learned advocate for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition. The learned advocates for the respondents do not have any objection if SCA/10305/2003 3/3 JUDGMENT the petitioners are permitted to withdraw the petition. 5. Permission as prayed for is granted. The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. Rule is discharged. ( HARSHA DEVANI, J. ) syed/