IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 19TH DECEMBER 2011 / 28TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 33844 of 2011(E) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER : --------------------- INDIRA VASUDEVAN BINDU BHAVANAM, THAMARAKUDY, MYLOM VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT BY ADVS. SRI.P.J.MATHEW SRI.THOMAS JOHN AMBOOKEN SRI.AJITH GEORGE RESPONDENTS ---------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KOLLAM-691 013 2. THE DISTRICT SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT, KOLLAM-691 001 3. THE ADDITIONAL TAHASILDAR, KOTTARAKKARA, K0LLAM DISTRICT-691 505 R1 TO R3 BY Sr. GOVT. PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: dlk WP(C).No. 33844 of 2011(E) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT. P1 : COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 29.05.2011. EXT. P2 : COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 10.06.2011 FROM THE OFFICE OF THE REVENUE MINISTER. EXT. P3 : COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 21.06.2011 FROM THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT. P4 : COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 23.11.2011 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS ' EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. dlk ANTONY DOMINIC, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 33844 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioner says that she has title over 80 cents of land situated in Sy.No.224/2 of Mylom Village in Kottarakkara Taluk. According to her on account of mistakes committed during re- survey, the extent of property got reduced to 67 cents. Therefore, she made representations to various authorities and finally, the 2nd respondent issued Ext.P4 informing her that the matter has been forwarded to the 3rd respondent. Petitioner submits that the 3rd respondent has not taken any further proceedings in this matter. With this complaint this writ petition has been filed. 2. Thus from the pleadings what is discernible is that the complaint made by the petitioner for rectification of re-survey mistakes is pending consideration before the 3rd respondent. Therefore I direct the 3rd respondent to take further action pursuant to Ext.P4 referred to above. This shall be done, as W.P.C. No. 33844 of 2011 -2- expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks of receipt of a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of the writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Kp/-