IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 12127 of 2008 Between: 1 N.Kamala Devi W/o.late N.Kanakaiah R/o.Vidyanagar, Hyderabad. 2 N.Prakash S/o.late N.Kanakaiah R/o.Vidyanagar, Hyderabad. 3 P.V.Ashok Kumar S/o.P.V.Raghavulu R/o.Puranapool, Hyderabad. 4 S.Prabhakar S/o.S.Krishanaiah R/o. Moulali, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Sub Registrar, Office of the Sub Registrar, Uppal, Ranga Reddy District. 2 Mothi Sarojini W/o.late N.Raghu Rama Rao R/o.H.No.3-4-871/6, Barkatpura, Hyderabad - 500 027. 3 T.Sitaramamma W/o.T.Pardhasaradhi R/o.No.2-2-647/72, Central Excise Colony, Vidyanagar, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus (a) declare the action of the 1st respondent in not stopping the registration of documents in respect of house sites to an extent of 2,061 Sq Yds in Plot Nos 40-E, 40-F, 40-G and 40-H (or part in Plot No.40) in the approved lay out in Survey Nos. 60/1, 62, 63 and 64 situated in Padmavathi Colony, Saroopnagar, Uppal Kalan village, Uppal Mandal, RR District as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution of India (b) consequently direct the 1st respondent not to entertain registration of sale deeds in respect of Plot Nos 40-E, 40-F, 40-G and 40-H (or part in Plot No.40) in the approved lay out in Survey Nos. 60/1, 62, 63 and 64 situated in Padmavathi Colony, Saroopnagar, Uppal Kalan village, Uppal Mandal, RR District. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: Sri.Ratna Rao, representing the learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners do not wish to pursue the writ petition. In view of the submission, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. ___________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J 2.6.2009. KRB. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION No. 12127 of 2008 Dated: 2.6.2009.