IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.660 of 2011 In (CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE 9752/2010) 1. SATYAWAN KUMAR, S/O SHAHDEO DAS, R/O VILLAGE SAMMAN CHAK, P.O. JAT DUMARI, P.S. PUNPUN, DISTRICT- PATNA .......APPELLANT Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, PATNA ........RESPONDENTS -------------------- 3 02-08-2011 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the order of the writ court protects the interest of the appellant/ writ petitioner by permitting him to move the Committee constituted under the orders of this court in another batch of writ petitions. However, he submits that in the last line of the order it has been recorded that the writ petition is dismissed and, hence, the word dismissal would prejudice his case. Considering the nature of the order passed by the writ court, it is deemed just and proper to allay the fear expressed on behalf of appellant and for that the last line of order under appeal is modified so that 2 writ application will be treated to have been disposed of instead of dismissed. The appeal is disposed of. BKS/- (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Shivaji Pandey, J.)