IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10345 of 2011 BIMLI DEVI @ BIMLA DEVI, W/O LATE RAJO TANTI. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being sister of the husband of the complainant of the complainant is apprehending her arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 364A, 467, 468, 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is that by assaulting the complainant’s husband a sale deed was got executed in favour of the petitioner. During investigation, accusation was found false and final form was submitted but subsequently cognizance was taken on protest. It appears that the petitioner lodged a case against the complainant under sections 302, 364, 201/34 of I.P.C. vide Barhat P.S.Case No.128/06 for murder of the husband of this petitioner in which the complainant’s side have already been convicted. Hence, it is submitted that in order to pressurize the 2 petitioner’s side the case has falsely been lodged against the petitioner. Considering the fact that the accusation was found false and the petitioner’s side lodged a specific case under section 302 I.P.C. against complainant side much earlier, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Jamui in connection with Complaint Case No. 1447C/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Nitesh (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)