1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2009 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2007 The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant Vs. Suhas Ganpat Shinde ...Respondent Mr. A.R. Patil, Addl. P.P for State/Applicant Suhas Ganpat Shinde, Respondent in person present in Court. CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. DATED: 28TH SEPTEMBER, 2007 P.C. 1. Heard the learned A.P.P for the State and the Respondent is personally present. We have perused the trial Court's Judgment dated 2 nd February, 2007 by the learned Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur acquitting the Respondent for the offence punishable under Sections 376, 312,417 and 506- II of the Indian Penal Code. 2. Perusal of Judgment clearly indicates that the victim/prosecutrix was aged more than 27 years and she 2 was continuously co-habiting with the accused for more than 5 years and she was residing with him. Over and above, it appears that she had undergone twice medical termination of pregnancy during the aforesaid period. 3. Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances we do not find any illegality or perversity in the impugned order. The Appeal is totally devoid of merits. We are not inclined to grant leave to appeal. Hence, the application for leave to file appeal stands dismissed. The Appeal also stands dismissed. (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)