IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.10422 of 2008. Decided on: 22.12.2010. Veer Bala. ……….Petitioner. Versus Himachal Pradesh University,Shimla. ……….Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner. : Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate. For the respondent. : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Petitioner was placed in the pay scale of Rs. 12,840-14,100/-. However, vide Annexure A-5 dated 3rd April, 2003, the pay of the petitioner was re-fixed. Petitioner has neither been issued notice nor any opportunity of being heard has been given before issuance of Annexure A-5 dated 3rd April, 2003. Petitioner has suffered civil and evil consequences since her salary has been reduced without hearing her. Consequently, the writ petition is allowed. Annexure A-5 dated 3rd April, 2003 is quashed and set aside. However, the liberty is reserved to the respondents to proceed with the matter in accordance with law. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 22, 2010. (krt) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?. No.