S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO.3742/2006 Date : 30.08.2006 HON'BLE MR. SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. S.P. Bhati for the applicant. Mr. Vishnu Kachhawaha, Public Prosecutor for State. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the impugned order. Learned counsel submits that the knife injuries inflicted injuries on the person of injured but he has no intention to cause injuries, therefore, the applicant should be given benefit of anticipatory bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the present case, I do not find it to be a fit case to extend benefit of anticipatory bail to the applicant. Accordingly, the bail application moved by the applicant under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is rejected. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J.