1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2601/2009 & C.A.NOS. 450, 452 & 453 ALL OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2152 /2001 (Zilla Parishad Wardha vs. Shamrao Tukaram Mankar and others ) ..................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr P D Meghe, Adv. for petitioner/applicant Mr D M Kale, AGP for R-2 & 3 Respondent No.1 though served, is absent. ... CORAM : PRASANNA B.VARALE, J. DATED : APRIL 19, 2010. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2601/2009: Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. By means of this application, the petitioner/ applicant is seeking amendment to the petition. Learned Advocate for the applicant submits that he has raised purely grounds of law. Furthermore, neither the texture nor the tenor of the petition would be changed by way of the said amendment. In view of the above submission; so also for the reasons stated in the application, the Civil Application is allowed. Amendment to be carried out with one week. 2 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 452/2010. Heard. By way of this application, the applicant is seeking condonation of delay. Mr. Meghe, learned Advocate for the applicant, submits that the delay caused is not deliberate and unintentional and for the reasons which are specifically enumerated in paragraph 3 of the application. Finding the reasons to be proximate, pertinent and proper, the delay caused is hereby condoned. Application is allowed. CIVIL APPLICATION NOS.450 & 453 BOTH OF 2010. Heard. For the reasons stated in the applications, both the Civil Applications are allowed in terms of the prayer. JUDGE sahare