IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 19TH AUGUST 2011 / 28TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 16895 of 2011(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.M.SHEREEF, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O.MUHAMMED, PUTHIYAVEETTIL HOUSE, VATANAPPILLY P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.ESM.KABEER RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. A.A.MUHAMMED, S/O.AHAMMED, ARAKKAVEETTIL HOUSE, VADANAPPALLY P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. P.K.HAMEED ALI, S/O.MUHAMMED UNNI, PUTHENVEETTIL, KIZHAKETHIL HOUSE, VADANAPPALLY P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. P.A.MUHAMMED, PANIKKAVEETIL, P.O.EDASSERY, THALIKULAM. 4. P.A.MUHAMMED UNNI, S/O.ADIMAKKUTTY, PAKKAKILLATH HOUSE, VADANAPPALLY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 5. MUHAMMED JAMALUDHIN, S/O.KOYA ALI, THERUVATH VEETTIL, VADANAPPALLY P.O. THRISSUR DISTRICT. 6. THE KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, V.I.P.ROAD, KALOOR, KOCHI - 17. ADV. SRI.A.MOHAMED BASHEER (MANGALAPURAM) FOR R1,3,4 SRI.JOSE KURIAKOSE (VILANGATTIL) FOR R5 SMT.M.R.JAYALATHA FOR R2 SC SRI.A.A.ABUL HASSAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 16895 of 2011 APPENDIX EXHIBITS EXT.P1- TRUE COPY OF THE O.P.24/2003 FILED BEFORE THE 8TH RESPONDENT WAKF BOARD EXT.P2- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 11.8.2003 EXT.P3- TRUE COPY OF THE TERMS OF SETTLEMENT AGREED BETWEEN THE PARTIES EXT.P4- TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C).13402/2009 DATED 25.5.09 (True copy) P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J .............................................. W.P.(C).16895/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 19th day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the sixth respondent. Although notice has been served on respondents 1 to 5, there is no representation on their behalf. 2.The only prayer sought in the writ petition is to direct the sixth respondent to expedite the disposal of Ext.P1 petition, O.P.No.24/2003, filed by the petitioner and four others. 3.In view of the pendency of Ext.P1 before the eighth respondent and taking note of the submission made, the writ petition is disposed of directing the eighth respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P1, with notice to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six months of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs