WPSS No. 882 of 2003 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. None appears for the petitioners. Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for the State/respondents. By means of present writ petition, petitioners have challenged the advertisement dated 29.8.2001 and 22.7.2003 contained in Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition so far as it has to effect of excluding the candidates having C.P.Ed. certificate. Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for the State has made a statement that the selection of candidates for Special B.T.C. in pursuant to advertisement dated 29.8.2001 and 22.7.2003 has already taken place, the process is over and selected candidate(s) has/have appointed. In view of the aforesaid statement, writ petition has been rendered infructuous and is dismissed as such. On the ground of alternative remedy, writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. (P.C. Verma, J.) 24.9.2008 Rathour