BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Sixteenth day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.10630 of 2011 T. SURESH KUMAR ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED 3 Vs STATE REP BY:: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CSCID, MADURAI, CRIME NO.417/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. T.LENIN KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR. A. RAMAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused No. 3 apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Clause 6(4) of TNSC (RDCS) Order 1982 r/w. Section 7(1)(a)(ii) of Essential Commodities Act, 1955, in Crime No. 417 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner arrayed as A3 and the case has been filed against the petitioner for the alleged offence punishable under Clause 6(4) of TNSC (RDCS) Order 1982 r/w. Section 7(1)(a)(ii) of Essential Commodities Act, 1955, in Crime No. 417 of 2011 and hence he apprehends arrest and hence prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3. Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the petitioner is the owner of rice mill and the value of the rice seized worth of Rs.21,000/- and the investigation is going on and hence he prays for dismissal of the petition. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner on condition that the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs. 21,000/- (Rupees Twenty One Thousand only) to the credit of Crime No. 417 of 2011 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No. III, Madurai, and on receipt of the same, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate NO. III, Madurai, and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.21,000/- (Rupees Twenty One Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 am., until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under section 438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously. 5. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 16/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.III, MADURAI 2 DO THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI 3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CSCID, MADURAI 1. CC to M/S. T.LENIN KUMAR Advocate SR.No.27835: DM::2011:AUGUST:17:: ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10630 of 2011 Date :16/08/2011 2P:6C:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/