IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.42610 of 2009 BHALU YADAV son of late Hari Prasad Yadav Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 15.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence under Section 47 (A) of the Excise Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing was recovered from his house or his conscious possession. The petitioner has clean antecedent. The allegation is that petitioner was involved in selling liquor near the local Railway line. As the petitioner is named in the First Information Report, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner. His prayer for anticipatory bail is refused. However, he will surrender and seek regular bail within one month before the court below (B.N. Mishra, Judicial Magistrate, Ara, Bhojpur in Excise Case no. 173 of 2008 / Tr. No. 3344 of 2008) which would be disposed of preferably on the same day without being prejudiced by this order. With the aforesaid observation, this application is disposed of. Let this order be sent through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)