IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2524 of 2011 SURINDER CHOUDHARY, SON OF LATE PHAGUNI CHOUDHARY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MADHAUL, P.O. MOTIPUR, VIA TAJPUR, P.S. TAJPUR, DIST. SAMASTIPUR. Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, SRI SUNIL MITRA, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE(REVENUE) CUSTOM AND CENTRAL EXCISE NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI. 2. THE CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF CUSTOM AND CENTRAL EXCISE, SRI S. DUTT MAJUMDAR, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVT. OF INDIA NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOM AND CENTRAL EXCISE, SMT. RINA ARYA, NOIDA B.123, SECTOR V NOIDA U.P. 4. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOM AND CENTRAL EXCISE SRI BISHWAJIT DUTTA, REVENUE BUILDING, BIRCHAND PATEL MARG, PATNA. --------------- 03. 23.09.2011 Counsel for the Central Excise Department states that in compliance of the order of the High Court dated 13.12.2010, Annexure-1 representation of the petitioner dated 30.12.2006 has already been considered and reasoned order communicated to the petitioner, which fact is also accepted by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the fact that order of the High Court has already been complied with this contempt petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order disposing of the representation dated 30.12.2006 as also the supplementary representation dated 19.01.2011 2 Annexure-2 which was also disposed of by the same order by which the earlier representation has been disposed of, against which petitioner has already filed writ petition. Petitioner is also at liberty to raise all the points in the writ petition, which has been raised in the contempt petition. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)