IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No.: 11728/2008 Decided on:3.3.2011 _____________________________________________ Surya Prakash. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. N.D. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anshul Bansal, Addl. A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Mr. N.D. Sharma submits that he has been instructed by his client to withdraw the present petition on the basis of assurance held out to his client by the respondent-department to consider his case sympathetically for regularization. Prayer is allowed. 2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed having been withdrawn. However, respondents shall consider the case of the petitioner sympathetically for regularization and his 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 services shall not be terminated, save and except in accordance with law. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. 3.3.2011 *awasthi*