IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13110 of 2011 TARKESHWAR RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 04.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report and it appears that the name of this petitioner came in this case in confessional statement of co-accused and subsequently, the confessional statement of petitioner was also recorded. It is stated that on the basis of confessional statement of the petitioner, the motorcycle, which had been used in committing the alleged crime, was recovered. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner was arrested by the police in connection with another case on 24.10.2010 and he was remanded in Shastri Nagar P.S. Case No. 400 of 2010 on 26.10.2010 and subsequently, the petitioner has been made accused in the present case and, as a matter of fact, nothing has been recovered on the basis of alleged confessional statement of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Shastri Nagar P.S. Case No. 377 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J ) 2