THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WP No. 32143 of 2011 Date of Judgment: 8.12.2011 Between: M/s. Agrimas Chemicals Limited …Petitioner and The Commissioner and Director of Agriculture ..Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WP No. 32143 of 2011 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned standing counsel appearing for respondent. It is not in controversy that the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court in W.P.No. 17337 of 2010 and batch, dated 1.11.2011. In view of that, there shall be a similar order in this case also. The writ petition is disposed of with the following order, (a) The petitioners shall submit a sample of 5 kgs., of each product dealt with by them together with the corresponding literature throwing light upon the manufacturing process as well as the contents thereof together with the composition/components of the products to the respondent herein. The respondents shall not refuse to receive the samples whenever submitted by the petitioners. (b) The petitioners shall also permit the oﬃcers authorized by the respondent to collect samples from the manufacturing units/sale points. The petitioners shall furnish details of their sale points to the respondent for drawal of samples. (c) The petitioners shall remit a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees ﬁve thousand only) in respect of each sample along with the samples to the respondent to meet the expenses of analysis. (d) Within 8 (eight) weeks from the date of compliance of conditions as indicated in Clauses (a), (b) and (c), the respondent shall get the same analyzed in a suitable laboratory and intimate the result of the analysis to the petitioners. (e) In case, the analysis reveals that the products dealt with by the petitioners answer the description of the products mentioned in Schedule-III to the Control Order and the Insecticides Act, it shall be entitled to deal with the products only after obtaining Registration/licence under the Control Orders. On the other hand, if the result is found otherwise, the petitioners shall not be subjected to the regime under the Control Orders; and (f) If the respondent fails to intimate the result of the analysis within 8 (eight) weeks from the date of submission of the samples as indicated above, it shall be open to the petitioners to deal with the products, notwithstanding the impugned letter and the memo, as long as the products are not insecticides or chemicals. It is also made clear that in the event the respondent receives any complaints from the ryots with regard to the quality of the bio- products supplied by the petitioners, it shall be open to the respondent to take necessary action in accordance with law. No costs. _________________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J Dt. 8.12.2011 KR