CWP No.1283/2008. 01.09.2008 Present: Mr Kul Bhushan Khajuria, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.R.K.Bawa, Advocate General with Mr.J.K.Verma, Deputy A.G., for respondents No.1 to 4, 6 & 7. This writ petition is directed against the orders passed by Deputy Commissioner and Divisional Commissioner respectively. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that Anganwari Worker was required in village Jhikli Bheth-II. The case of the petitioner is that the two Courts below have wrongly appreciated the facts, namely, that the petitioner does not belong to village Jhikli Bheth-II. In support of his argument, the learned counsel has submitted that the petitioner belongs to Jhikli Bheth. The learned Advocate General has submitted that Kholi, Dheran, Choya, Gharati and Tamrellu are feeding villages for Jhikli Bheth-II. We are of the considered opinion that the two Courts below have rightly appreciated the evidence on record in deciding the matter. We also further find that the post was not for Jhikli Bheth but for Jhikli Bheth-II and Jhikli Bheth is not the feeding village of Jhikli Bheth-II. Therefore, we do not find that the two Courts below have decided the matter in arbitrary manner without application of mind. In fact, in the light of reasons indicated by the two Courts, we are in agreement with the orders passed by the Courts below. …2… With these observations and in light of above discussion, the writ petition is dismissed, so also the pending application. ( Jagdish Bhalla ), C.J. September 1, 2008. ( Kuldip Singh ), J. (soni)