IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.10414/2011-B, 10415/2011-B & 10433/2011-D Decided on: 2.12.2011 CWP No.10414/2011-B Dalbir Singh ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and another ….Respondents. CWP No.10415/2011-B Baboo Ram ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others ….Respondents. CWP No.10433/2011-D Rattan Chand ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others ….Respondents. Coram : The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge For the petitioner(s): Mr.Pawan Gautam, Advocate in CWP No.10414 of 2011. Mr.Rakesh Kumar Dogra, Advocate, in CWPs No.10415 & 10433 of 2011. For the respondents: Mr.R.K. Bawa, A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral): The petitioner(s) claim the benefit of the decision of the Supreme Court in Mool Raj Upadhyaya Vrs. State of H.P. , 1994 Supp. (2) SCC 316 and claim work charge status on completion of ten years of daily waged service with 240 days per year. In any case, as rightly pointed out by the learned Deputy Advocate General, there cannot be work charge status prior to 1.1.1994. The claim for regularization will be considered only subject to the availability of vacancies. All these aspects, the petitioner(s) pray, they may be permitted to bring to the notice of the second respondent/competent authority. It is open to them to do so. In the event of the petitioner(s) filing appropriate representation furnishing their service particulars, the matters will be considered and appropriate action will be taken in accordance with law within four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with the representation by the petitioner concerned before the second respondent/competent authority. 2 2. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice (Justice V.K. Ahuja), December 2, 2011 Judge (tilak)