IRH C011R1 T)(. iVISSQN BENCH I'BLE SHI >TA- €*.. hri Firoj Khan, aged 32 years, son of 31 Wahid Khan, resident of village/P.O. Kelapara, Ratsnpur, tehsii Kota, district Siiaspur (C.G.) 2. 3. 1. Ganpatlal Khaiwar, son of Shri Ramsai Khairwar, resident of village C'nutuwa Bhauna, P.S. Pali, tehsii and district Bilaspur (C.G.) flsn; Construction aarvamangla Company Llmited, resident of Malviya road, big shop, Raipur, tehsil and district Raipur (C.G.) The I.C.I.C.I. Lombard, Genera! Insurance Company Ltd., through the Branch Manager, V.R. Plaza, Link road Bilaspur, tehsil & district Bilaspur (C.G.) [Insursr) iCT. lresent: Shri Somnath Verma, iearned counsel for the (12'" December, The foiiowina order of the Court wa; 5SSS bv '"'•Ssac-.s M5 Shri Somanth Verma, learned counsel for the appellant is heard on admission. 2. Tribunal's records perused. 3. Appellant Firoj Khan is seeking enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Sixth Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bilaspur (for short "the Tribunal") vide avi/ard dated 22.04.2008, passed in Claim Case No.126/2007. 4. As against the compensation of Rs.11,58,000/- claimed by the appellant/claimant, by filing a claim petition under Section 1 66 of the Motor Vehicles Act, for the injuries sustained by him in the motor accident on 16.09.2007, the Tribunal awarded a total sum of Rs.35,000/- as compensation along with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition tiil the date of actual payment. 5. S'nri Somnath Verma, learned counsel for the appellant vehementiy argusd that compensation of Rs.35,000/- awarded by the Trlbuna! is too 'ow in comparison to the serious injuries sustained by the appeilant/claimant in the motor accidenf. 6. For the reasons best known to the appellant/'claimant, no Doctor was examined before the Tribuna! to establish the nature of the injuries sustained by the appellant in the motor accident and the fact that those injuries resulted in any permanent efisabilitv. subbu 7. in this stafe of evidencs, we do not find any scope for enhancement ofthe compensation awarded by the Tribunal. 8. The appeal filed by the appellant for enhancement of the ompensation, therefore, is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed summarily. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- K.umar Sinha ige ^ F t ^