W.P. No. 333(ss)02: Old No. 3949/96 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. Heard learned Standing Counsel for the petitioner. None is present for the respondent no. 1. This writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 26th July 1995 passed by the Public Service Tribunal allowing the claim of the respondent no. 1 and setting-aside termination order dated 27.07.1984 passed by the petitioner. The Tribunal has directed that the respondent no. 1 shall be deemed in continues service and will be entitled to get salary in accordance with the Rules. It appears that the respondent no. 1 has been allowed by the department to continue in his services. By efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous and as such, the writ petition is dismissed being infructuous. (B. S. V., J.) (M. M. G., J.) 27.07.2006: NCM: