Q? ' \ 5i S.B. (Service Matter) IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ICHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITIONS) N032037201 1. / PETITIONER: Munna Ram, son of Chandar Ram, aged about 34 years, Peon, residence of Naveen Pahadi Korwa Ashram, Kurdih, Block Kusmi, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. VCI‘SUS Respondents ,l?/§tate of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, A 7/00 Qt? _}\eq. 2. N Commissioner, D.K.S.Bhawan, Tribal Ralpur, Welfare Chhattlsgarh. ‘ Department, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. r/V ..... 3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Sarguja” E, Chhattisgarh. 4. Collector, Sarguja, District Sarguja, (”Chhattisgarh. 5. Block Education Offlcer, Block Kusmi, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA WWW wmm WWW {n ha WW WW aieymmm B : Hon’bie $hri Manindra Moham Shrivastavaa J. 2 a nnAA v.3.ivi Shri C.J.K. Rao, counsel for th petitioner. Shri N. Naha Roy! Panei Lawy rfor the State, on advance copy. Learned counsel for the petitio er submits that ihe issue reiating to ciaim of contractual payment to Cook and her empioyees came up for consideration before this Couri in WP. (S) No.2 04/11 and batch of petitions and after examining the claim of ihe peiiiione this Coun had directed consideration of: the case in those cases. He submits I at the case of the petitioner is covered by the aforesaid order. 0n ihe other hand, iearned counsei for the State submits that the representation of the petitioner would e decided after due verification. After going through the ord r dated 15.4.2011 passed in W.P.(S) No.2004/11, it is apparent that the c e of the petitioner is squarely covered by the aforesaid order. Therefore, the pe itioner is also entitled to the same direction in the case. Accordingiy, it is directed that the petitioner makes fresh representation before the concerned authority, claim ng payment of minimum wages applicabie to a contract empioyee under te Chhattisgarh Civil Service (Contract Appointment) Ruies, 20M. the sam shali be disposed of in accordance with law, Within a period of eight weeks fro the date of submission of representation. in the event of any adverse order, t e petitioner would be at iiberty to tile writ petition afresh. With the afOresaid direction, th petition is tinaliy disposed of. K. Sd/— Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge a) t