IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13033 of 2009 RAMANAND PRASAD, son of Late Kedar Nath Prasad, resident of Village Bajitpur, P.S. Kudhani, District Muzaffarpur at present resident of Lala Tola, Raghunathpur, Motihari, P.S. Turkauliya, District East Champaran. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Inspector General of Registration, Bihar, Patna. 2. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Registrar-Cum-District Magistrate, Sitamarhi. 4. The District Sub-Registrar, Sitamarhi. 5. The Sub-Registrar, Parihar, Sitamarhi. ---Respondents ---------- 2. 8.10.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that while sanctioning the pensionary benefits, the authorities have failed to take into consideration the service rendered by the petitioner as Extra Clerk in the Registration Office. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the order dated 28.11.2001 passed in C.W.J.C. No.5866 of 2000, as contained in Annexure 4, the authorities are required to take into consideration the aforesaid period for the purpose of pensionary benefits. Learned counsel further submits that for redressal of the grievances, the petitioner had filed a representation. However, the same has not been considered as yet. The learned counsel for the State submits that in case the petitioner files a fresh representation, the same would be considered without delay. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the 2 petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the grievances as raised in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the District Registrar-cum-District Magistrate, Sitamarhi (respondent no.3). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of the claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, respondent no.3 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner as raised in the representation and dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner could be redressed without delay. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)