C?Io’OZ,.' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition(s)No. 65%?) (2007 grit. Archana Kashyap Aged about 27 years, W/o Durga Prasad Kashyap R/o Village Padgawan, Tahsil Pendra Road, Distt. Bi‘aspur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department of Woman & Child Development, D.K.S hawan, RaipUr (C.G.) The Commissioner, Woman & Child Development, Raipur (C.G.) The Collector (Mahila Bal Vikas) Bilaspur, Bilaspur (C.G.) The Program/Project Officer, Woman & Child Development (Project) Pendra, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panc‘hayat Pendra Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) PETITIONER RESPONDENTS : ,l/. \w B 6. Smt. Lalita, W/o. Jeewan Das Caste—Mahra, R/o ViHage Padgawan, Tahsil Pendraroad, District Bilaspur (C.G.) / WRIT PETITION U A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HEGH COURT OF JUDECATURE CHHATTIS§ARH: aILA5?UR $ia4g§e gench: Hon'bie 5hri Sa?ish K. Agniha‘?r§, J. é W. P, {£3 Na. é&3 9F 200? S‘hri Bkam’r La! Dembm, caunse! for ‘E‘he pefifioner. Shr§ sus‘ml Duba, 6ev2rnmem Advoca're for ‘i’he responden?s N0. 1 1'9 4f5’rafe (W A. 9§EEQ {i’assed m é?” day a“? Fabruar‘y, 2G0?) Leamw counse? appearing for "ihe pa?ifioner 5ubmi‘?s fha’l' fha pe'rifieanzr- was work§mg aa Aanganwa&i Worker m viiiage ?adgawan, Tahsi! ?aé1dm Raad, mswm‘ BHaspur. in her placa, The responden‘r No. 6 has mew appoin‘md as Aangcmwaéi Worker m "rhe womd #ha’? she is Schaduled Caste candida'm. He ‘fw‘i’hzr suhmi‘w firm? ‘E'he reslaomdenf No. ’é beiongs fa ‘II me'ham, ) no‘i‘ iMam? I and as such she §s no? SmeéuaaQ l i ! Cag‘m candidefa. I“? is caafendad 1*ha? '1‘ha pef§?%oner has oba‘ainad more mar-ks in class $ +91 examina‘rion and The cand§dares having mere marks in ciass 8% examimi‘ion ceriificm‘e have beea’: givgn preference, ”m m‘hars aveii fixase who are havirig higi’mr ?e?i?iomr : 5min Archam Kashyap Versus Responden?s 1 S‘m‘re 0f Chhcxffisgar'h & ofher‘s. Present quaiificafion. Learned counsel for fhe peTii‘ioner‘ lasf§y submi’rs Thu? ‘i'he represen‘m'rion has been fi!ed before fhe Chief ExecuTive Officer, Janpad Panchaym' Pendm on 12.1.2007, which is sfili pending considerm‘ion. In view of ‘fhaf, fhe Chief Executive Officer» Janpad Parichayef Pendr-a, Dis‘h‘ic‘r Bilaspur is direcTed h) consider and pass appropriafe order on fhe pending represen‘miion of ‘i‘he peTiTioner. The wri'i pe'ri'rion is accordingiy disposed of. No order as To cosi‘s. Sd/— r Satish K. Agnihotri i Judge Sabiu r y ‘ i