SIIS" •s-s, 22'^ • ,a r ^p^. ^i'SL ."-- • (^* ^\<SiQ'\ (b IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE^AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S) No. ~^rc(c\ / 2006 PETITIONER -:t. It--, > ^'-CP^ ^'p^ ^;^' '^^ LCTA'V3 Kk" ^^ ^y G\>' Akhilesh Kumar Singh, S/o. Shri S.D. Singh, aged about 43 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Narhardev Hr. Sec. School - Kanker, Distt.- Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS, ^ ,....^ Ov'**"(^ <?.-*' L\^v^^"'. ^y^ •.^" &W-" State of Chhattisgarh & Others Through- The Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Distt. - Kanker (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTiON OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE DLRECTION ETC TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. •Tji-ui^&es QEJME_PET|TION : XI-HC-78 S^'^ffincPT, wrfl'H'KB, (Siciitiy __ ^•P.C^^o.'7o7^_ *li«iwishtiith •••••••••'••••••••••• ^p:j- 2006 B CT^Trira^? (<j[orf3g<?r) •SFfW (W 311^1 St)1 Bab'u ^\-^K. ??cnw(ifersn^r w0° p l\' Mr. Anil Singh Rajput, cou^isei for the petitioner-s. Miss Sunita Jain, Pane! lai^yer for the respondents/State. With the consent of iear^ied counse! for the parties, the matter Is heard finatiy and dispo^ed of. Order dictotad in open C^i pdssed separateiy. ¥- ^rafepfrr WRrFifteA (te^R ^sTf^rsn^r >urt in W.P. (s) No. 7096/2006, Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge P.T.O. SIN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE WR. SATESH K^ASNIHOTRI^J, '. P. (s) No. 7096 of 2006 E» Petitioner Respondents Awadhesh Kumar* Pandey versus State of Chhatfisgarh and others PJ.s.) N0. 7097 of 200( Petitioner Respondents Petitioner 'f' Petitioner Smt. Radheswari Patel versus State of Chhattisgarh ana' others P (s.) N0. 7098 of Smt. Mridula Jofar versus State of Chhattisgarh and others Akhi'esh Kumar Singh versus State of Chhattisgarh and o1+ie"s M W P (s.) N0. 7100 of 2005 itioner : Risabh Kumar- Jain ts Petitioner Respondents versus State of Chhattisgarh and others P (s.) N0. 7101 of 2006 Smt. Anjali Mehra versus State of Chhattisgarh and others Petitioner ai Uewangoui yersus State of Chhatf-isqarh and othei's Petitioner Nakul Singh Netam versus State of Chhattisgarh and others Present : Mr. Anll Singh Rajput, counset for the petitionsrs Miss Sunita Jcln, Panel tawyer for the State/respondents. (Passsd on this 20 day of December, 2006) 1. Learned counsel appear'in9 for the petitioners as also fo" the Stats/respondents jointly submit 1+iat the fccts and questiors of iaw involved in ths pr-esent writ petitions are squareiy covered by rhe decision of this Court in the case of •» ;. w.unicit 2. For ths afo"ementioned reasons, the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of Yashwant Kumai' Shar'adwaj {Suyd'), subject to verification of the fact GS to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.T-I. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circuiars dated 24-12-1998 md 1-3-1999 and further- whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. ¥- 3. A CODY of this order- be piaced on the record of the connected wrlt patitions. Sd/- Satish KAgnihotri Judge 1 2006 CII) MPJS-C6 95