IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37968 of 2010 NUNESHWAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----- 03. 08.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. Some incident took place is the admitted fact. According to the prosecution, ransom was demanded and on its non-fulfillment, glass of J.C.B. machine was broken and informant was parted with cash and his mobile is supported by witnesses. Defence is about petitioner being ‘Sarpanch’ of the village and only compensation was demanded by villagers whose crops were damaged. On place of occurrence, pieces of glass are recovered. Thus, I find it not a fit case for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer of petitioner for anticipatory bail stands rejected. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)