1^! l^ C,^ L^ ® •r IN THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION (S) NO^S5 f^ /2011. PETITIONER: /" ^>..':/'^ ^•••"w y^y ^^> s'}^ ^,w -.•'? >'' •^\/f" ^' ^^" ,-••"" ''^"~" ^ Respondents: Shobanram Bhagat, son of3ca*^uft^*<l aged about 63 years, Retired Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Tamta, Block Patthalgaon, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, residence of Mirzapur, Post Sukhpara, Tahsil Patthalgaon, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Director, Lok Shikshan Sanchanalaya, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 The Accountant General of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFJNDIA ~s^ ^|i^id<LI, ^nl^^Ko. [^<ni<iy 31 STT^T 'q5RR \N^.(^^^^/U *{W^{ $b^|cb "^ 200 'fN^y' 3:n^T'^T ^ich STI^T 5b^icb ^f^a ^Rff^T ^<nW^TT SB LHpn'bie Shri Manindra Mohan 5 11-05-2011 Shri C. J. K. Rao, counsel forthl Shri Sushil Dubey, Governmenti Shri Kashif Shakeel, coun^ Chhattjsgarh. With the consent of learned co| heard finally. This case pertains to grieva CM^t^<fln TTW^ff '? 'fe^t ipai^K '^3:rf^R3Tr^T hrivastava,J. ^ petitioner. iAdvocate for the State. \e\ for Accountant General of ^insel for the parties, the petition is ^ice of non-grant of retiral dues. Learned counsel appearing for the petftioner, on instructions, submits that the matter may be referred to the Pens| This Court, in W.P.No.4642/200|4 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & others) and other Committee to consider the matter of retrl facts were involved. The Committe^ was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the orde W.P.No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Kej'a Bai Ch^ndrakar Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh and others), and order (^ No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh another). Thus, this petition is squaretyl on Committee. connected matters, directed the ial dues as the disputed question of dated 19-06-2006 passed in lated 13-3-2008 passed in M.C.C. ?nd others Vs. Baijnath Mandal and covered by the judgment and order dated 31st January, 2008 passed in V\|r.P.No.4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal (supra) as submitted by learned counsel|appearing for the parties. This petition i^ accordingly dispjosed of in the same terms i.e., the office of the Advocate General is dfrected to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days ft-om the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the Committee shjall issue notice to the petitioner and 'M^^fN^l^^i^i •^;;igi^^'^i:^l®tl -^ iv^^'^il:^^^. 'iissasisxs ^^^&^^sSS^S 5SSSS^^^Ss 7%^tiail%iiisi; ^:^MiMi&^iS ^^i'!(^S§SWSi - ;-~%ti^@il^iii:^ lilSll^gjiii^ 'MSSSWSSS [^^^f .i^iigsssisssi B -HC:-22 ^v^,/ v' ^.. ^' ^.^s^^ 'TST ^iNld^, ^nl^^Ko. fa<ni^^< 31 HW^l 5b+1|cb StT^T 'tR"^ _^1:^).^:^^.!_ 7'"^P(. 200 '^Siii^i^S """"""""""""""••••-fN^y*"•••••"••••"•••""•••••••••" ^TT^T^T f<'li<=h 3TI^T 9ti^ich ^f^a Tumane ,(V7' ys^ '^nw '^nf^T _^, officers concerned within a further peric|d of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order, in accordan opportunity of hearing to the petition^r. The petitioner and the officers |i|||^^^B concerned may file additional document including payment of retiral dues, if arly, to the petitioner, be completed within a period of-four months from th^ date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall supply one State counsel as well as counsel for the the same to the Committee. cM<l(<n<flr1 *4H<nI ^ f^^l ipai^K ^T ^rf^w 3?n^?T ^e with law, after affording proper , if necessary. The entire exercise, |complete set of the petition to the |Accountant General for transferring Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^^^^§AliI@'^M^%l^ '''^•'^:^^'^ss:'^^i ^^ "rm