IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2717 of 2007 OM PRAKASH SINHA son of Late Kishori Chand Roy, resident of Ram Sagar Talab, P.S.- Civil Line Gaya, District- Gaya Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna 3.The District Magistrate, Gaya 4.The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 5.District Superintendent of Education, Gaya, District- Gaya ----------- 2 20.04.2009 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. A reply affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. The only grievance of the petitioner is that the difference of salary for the period 01.01.1973 to 31st of March, 1973 which was deposited in the G.P.F. account of the petitioner was paid without the statutory interest payable on such amount. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that from the writ petition it does not appear that interest has not been paid, however in case petitioner represents highlighting his claim before the respondent no.5 the same shall be considered as per law. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of the grievances with regard to interest over the aforesaid amount, which according to him has not been paid along with statutory interest, the petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.5. In this view of the matter, it is directed that in case such representation is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order, the respondent no.5 shall consider and dispose of the same by a reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of the representation taking into consideration the grievance with regard to the claim of interest at the statutory rate over the aforesaid amount paid to him during the pendency of this writ application. Upon such consideration, if the representation is disposed of in favour of the petitioner, the above respondent shall simultaneously issue necessary orders so that the grievances of the petitioner, as raised in the representation, could be redressed without delay in the light of the order passed by him on such representation. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.) Manish/-