IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 301 of 2008 Bankey Lal Bhargawa …..…… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ....……… Respondents Coram:- Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Present: Mr. S.S. Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.C. Bisht, Advocate for the respondents. Date of Decision: 14.05.2010 J.S. Khehar, C.J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondents states, that he has obtained instructions from Shri Parshu Ram Verma, District Education Officer, Tehri Garhwal, and in view of the instructions obtained by him, the impugned order dated 09.07.2008 shall be withdrawn by passing an appropriate order within one week from today. Learned counsel for the respondents further states, that the respondents may be granted liberty to initiate action against the petitioner as may be permissible in accordance with law. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondents, that the impugned order dated 09.07.2008 would be withdrawn, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous and the same is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Liberty is, however, granted to the respondents to initiate fresh action, on the same cause of action, as may be open for the respondents, in accordance with law. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 14.05.2010 P. Singh