IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M-3950 of 2009 Date of decision : 11.2.2009. ... Ashutosh Goel and another ................ Petitioners vs. Sushil Kumar .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. V.B. Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners. ... K.C. Puri, J. (Oral) The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of complaint dated 11.9.2004 (Annexure P-1) as well as, summoning order dated 28.5.2005 (Annexure P-2) passed by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Jagadhri. One Sushil Kumar filed a complaint against the present petitioners with the allegation that he is owner of the property and the present petitioners have sold that property in favour of Pankaj Saini and Ram Saran and Jagjeevan Ram appeared as marginal witnesses. Admittedly, petitioners have the remedy of filing a revision and they have not availed that remedy. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that prima facie no offence under Section 420 IPC is made out. He has submitted that cheating was not against the complainant. Crl.M. No. M-3950 of 2009 -2- It is not disputed during the course of arguments that Sushil Kumar is in possession. The counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the ancestors of petitioners were the owners and they have inherited the property. This disputed question of fact cannot be adjudicated in the proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Moreover, the petitioners have remedy of filing a revision. So, no ground for interference is made out. The petition stands dismissed. However, if any application for exemption is filed before the trial Court, that shall be decided within 15 days. ( K.C. Puri ) 11.2.2009. Judge chug