BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Third day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.17082 of 2011 1 JERIN 2 JEGAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOTTICODE POLICE STATION, KOTTICODE, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.253/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.N.S.RAMAKRISHNA DASS Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 323, 324 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.253 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police, the petitioners have approached this Court for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2.Heard Mr.N.S.Ramakrishna Dass, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. It is also submitted that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital and no prejudice would be caused to the prosecution in the event of the petitioners release on anticipatory bail. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would also submit that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Padmanabhapuram and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 23/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / TO Sub-Assistant Registrar 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PADMANABHAPURAM. 2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI AT NAGERCOIL. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTTICODE POLICE STATION, KOTTICODE, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC TO M/S.N.S.RAMAKRISHNA DASS ADVOCATE SR.NO.45667. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.17082 of 2011 Date :23/12/2011 2P/6C RPB : 26.12.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/