IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN FRIDAY, THE 31ST JULY 2009 / 9TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 21582 of 2009(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- T.N.SIDHARTHAN, S/O.NARAYANAN AGED 56 YEARS, THEKKUMTHOTTATHIL, VADAKKUMPURAM P.O. NORTH PARAVOOR, ERNAKULAM, TEMPORARILY NOW RESIDING AT THEKKUMTHOTTATHIL P.O. EDVILANGU, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.PREMOD SRI.SUDHEER GANESH KUMAR.R. RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KODUNGALLUR, 2. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, IRINJALAKUDA. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.A.SALIM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN & P.BHAVADASAN, JJ. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 21582 OF 2009 ------------------------------- Dated this the 31st July, 2009 J U D G M E N T Raman, J. On the face of the averments made in the writ petition, we do not think, it is a case for taking any action on the allegation that there is police harassment. Even the petitioner admits that notice was issued to him for his appearance. If he has no cause to appear before the police, it is for him to challenge such notice before the appropriate proceedings. If his complaint is that the police office is intimidating him for signing a blank cheque or any other document, he can approach the criminal court and file a private complaint. In such circumstances, leaving open the right of the petitioner to seek redressal of his grievances before the appropriate proceedings, the writ petition is dismissed. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE P.BHAVADASAN , JUDGE. nj.