'51 COURT OF CHHATnS^4RH .4T .M..4.NQ.384/2006 COftAM: Hon-ble ^iri S.ft.Nayak, Chief Justice A Hon'ble Shri Dijip J. ApDellonts Non-Appljcants ^ Respondents 1. Sjb-DJyisJonaI Officer, Water Management Sub-Divjsion NoA, ftoiipur, Distt. ftaipur (C6) : 2. Chief Engineer; Irrigation Department, i&overnment of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, bistt, Raipur, : 3, Co!!ector, Distt Raipur. 1. Khan. 5/o Jabba an, A^usalman. R/o Taj Chowk, Telibandha, Ralpur, Oisn. Raipur, Present address Through Sub- Divisiona! Offlcer, Water AAanagement Sub-DJyision No4, Raipur/ Distt. Ralpur (^&) fHA^Al : 2. Bai, Wd/o Tekuram Dhruv, about 30 years. 3. Ku. Chuneshwari Bai, D/o Tekuram Dhru^, about 9 years. : 4, Ku. Tanuja Boi, D/o Tekuram Dhruv, about 7 years. : 5. Ku. Jeetu, D/o Tekuram Dhruv, 3 years. '* 6. &evraj Dhruv, S/o Tekuram bhruv* (5!.No.3 to.6 through' AAother Rekhns Bai, Permanent Address: Viltege- Jhiriya, P.0< Kamta, Distt, ftaipur PresentSy residing at .4rang, P,0. Ara^ig, Disn. Raipur (C6) rCLAIMANTS) Shri Vinay Harit, Dy. Advocate ^eneral for the State, OR.4L (Passed on 3.4.2006) The foibwing oral order of the Court by &R.Kl4y.4K, C.J. -2.- .^: ..-ty •• *r- In this the on!y contention raised,.by the of the motor vehicie is that thcir vehicie not invoived in the accident and therefore, the H{A£T.is not Justified in faslBning the jiability to poy to the of the on thcm, Sjch a the AA<A,C,T in the pteading fi!ed by the herein, In that of the rriatt'er, the M.A.CT. has the fojlowing for trial, "^TT Ryit"4? 31.05.2003 ^ ^lf^ 9.00 ^ ^.-1 ^ ^. ^ft. ^'. -02 1831 ^ teRT^t ^ ^bS^ WCT ?' ^t 2. The is in favour of the claimants and the herein having into consideration the oral testimony of the of the of the and the filed jn the crimJna! Therefore, it cannot be that the recorded by the M,A*C<T, is for of evidence. No other point us. 3, The is of merit.nnd it is accordingly dismJssed, No costs. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge