[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLN.NO. 335 OF 2007 IN CRI.APPLN.NO.2393 OF 2003 Smt.Sharyu D.Rege ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.A.K.Singh i/b M/s.Lex Remedeum advocate for Applicant Smt.A.S.Pai, A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : OCTOBER 24, 2007 DATE : OCTOBER 24, 2007 DATE : OCTOBER 24, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Two prayers have been made in the application. The first prayer is for return of passport of the applicant. The ground for return of passport is that the applicant suffers from some ailment and she may want to go abroad where her son is staying, in order to treat the ailment. As far as this prayer is concerned, liberty is granted to the applicant to prefer a fresh application for return [-2-] of passport as and when she wishes to go abroad. Hence, this application is being considered only in respect of prayer clause (b) i.e. for expeditious hearing of Criminal Application No.2393 of 2003. The learned A.P.P. states that there is no objection to the said prayer being granted. In view of the above statement and looking to the fact that the matter is of the year 2003, this application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). Criminal Application No.2393 of 2003 be placed on board for final hearing in the week commencing from 3.12.2007. 3. Application stands disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]