IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21779 of 2010 PAPPU YADAV SON OF RAJENDRA YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DIGHRA, TOLA MORKAHI, P.S. GHAILARH, DISTRICT - MADHEPURA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SUKUMARI DEVI DAUGHTER OF KAMLESHWARI YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ARARAHA, P.S. SOUR BAZAR, DISTRICT SAHARSA ----------- 03. 31.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The offence alleged is under Sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Despite service of notice, no one appears on behalf of the Opposite Party no. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner of demand and torture. He further submits that co-accused persons have been allowed bail by this court. Learned counsel for the State submits that there is allegation of demand of dowry and torture against the petitioner who is the husband of the complainant. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, 2 above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Saharsa in connection with Complaint Case No. 1087C of 2009 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) Cr. P.C. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)