THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1645 OF 2008 ORDER: The petitioner-appellant filed this revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking to assail the order dated 25.02.2008 in I.A.No.555 of 2006 in R.A.No.52 of 2005 on the file of the Additional Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, in dismissing the petition filed under Rule 11 (3) of the A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1961, seeking to set aside the dismissal order dated 08.07.2006 and restoration of R.A.No.52 of 2005. The Court below dismissed the petition on the ground that the petition is time-barred and was filed straight away without filing petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, to condone the delay of 11 days. During the course of arguments, it has been pointed out that the petitioner and the respondents filed similar such applications in R.C.No.423 of 2002 on the file of the I Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad, and they are pending consideration. In view of the aforesaid reasons, it is felt desirable that the applications filed by both the parties could be disposed of together rather than allowing one set of applications leaving the other set. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed and consequently, R.A.No.52 of 2005 also stands allowed. The matter is remitted back to the trial Court for consideration of all the applications filed by both the parties together and dispose of the same on merits in accordance with law after giving notice and opportunity to both the sides. No costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) 10th December 2010 RRB