1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.2879 of 2006 with Chamber Summons No.342 of 2006 and Chamber Summons No 72 of 2007. Samata Nagar Coop Hsg Scy Ltd. ..Petitioners vs The MCGB and Ors. ..Respondents Mr Mahendra Gehani i/b M/s Law Charter for the petitioners. Ms. A. K Savla for respondent No.1 Mr. Milind More AGP for respondent- State Mr H. G Wakshe i/b Mr. G.N. Salunke – applicant in Chamber Summons No 342 of 2006 Mr A.R Shaikh for Intervener. CORAM: J.N. PATEL,Acg C.J. ,& S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE: March 12, 2007. P.C.:- Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The learned counsel for the petitioners has tendered his submissions, which is taken on record and marked “X” for identification. The learned counsel states that the petitioners are willing to make a representation on the basis of of the submissions made before this Court which is marked as “X”. We are inclined to permit the withdrawal of the petition in order to enable the petitioners to make representation to the 2 respondents in respect of the impugned notice without adding any rider in the matter so that the respondent- MHADA can decide the representation on its own merits. The learned counsel submits that the representation shall be made within a week's time. On such representation being made the respondents would take decision within a period of four weeks. In the meantime the interim order passed on 4th October 2006 would remain in operation till then. Petition is permitted to be withdrawn and accordingly stands disposed of as withdrawn. In view of the disposal of the main petition, Chamber Summons Nos 342 of 2006 and 72 of 2007 do not survive. ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.