IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO : 5429 of 2007 Between: 1 V.Venkata Ramaiah S/o.late Somayajulu R/o.80-32-7, Saradanagar, Visakhapatnam. 2 Smt.V.Surya Prakasam S/o.late V.V. Somayajulu R/o.80-32-7, Saradanagar, Visakhapatnam. 3 V.Madhukar S/o.late V.V. Somayajulu R/o.80-32-7, Saradanagar, Visakhapatnam. (Petitioners 2 and 3 are rep. by their GPA holder V.Venkata Ramaiah 1st petitioner) ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 State Bank of India, rep. by its Managing Director, Corporate Office, State Bank Bhavan, Mumbai. 2 State Bank of India, Overseas Branch, Visakhapatnam District, rep. by its Asst. General Manager. 3 M/s. Triton Rocks Private Limited, rep. by its Managing Director, Plot No.16, Flat No.303, Ayodhya Apartments, Kirlampudi Layout, Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the possession notice issued by the 1st and 2nd respondents dt. 13.2.2007 which is published in the daily newspaper The Hindu dated 4.3.2007 in so far as it relates to the agricultural lands of the petitioners herein which is more fully described in the statement enclosed to the writ affidavit, as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement Security Interest Act, 2002, and also violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and set aside the same and consequently stay all further proceedings pursuant to the said possession notice including auction and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.SUBRAHMANYAM KURELLA Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.DEEPAK BHATTACHARJEE The Court made the following: ORDER: (Per V.Eswaraiah, J.) Sri Venkatesh representing Sri Subrahmanyam Kurella, learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that he got instructions to withdraw the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The interim stay granted earlier shall stand vacated. No order as to costs. ________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. _________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J. 23.3.2009 kpr