26.3.2008 Present: Shri Onkar Jairath, counsel for the petitioners. COPC No. 50 of 2007. This contempt petition is misconceived. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the petitioners filed an Original Application before the learned H.P. State Administrative Tribunal. The learned Tribunal directed that the petitioners may be given benefit of counting their approved military service for the purpose of pay fixation and seniority. The State challenged this order before us and this Court had dismissed the writ petition of the State in April, 2007. We had also vacated the stay order granted by this Court. In case the order passed by the learned Tribunal has not been complied with by the State, the petitioners can take appropriate action including contempt proceedings before the learned Tribunal but definitely those proceedings will not lie in this Court. The contempt petition is disposed of. Dasti copy. ( Deepak Gupta ), J. March 26, 2008 ( Surinder Singh ), J. s