IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO.21538 of 2007 Between: Sri Tallapaka Annamacharya, Educational Society, Rajampet, Rep by its Correspondent & Secretary Sri M. Penchaiah, S/o. Gangaiah, aged about 47 years, R/o. Rajampet, Cuddapah District. ...PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of A.P., Rep by its Principle Secretary, Department of School Education, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Chairman, DIET-CET of A.P. (District Institute of Education and Training) & Director of School Education, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 3 The Convenor, DIET CET-2007 & Regional Joint Director of School Education, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not fixing the Management Quota, Fee Structure and Staff Salaries for the admission of students in to the petitioner institution (D.Ed. Course) recognized by the N.C.T.E. as per law reported in 2002(8) SCC page 481 & 2003 (6) SCC page 697 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the law, violative to Art. 14, 19(1)(g), and 144 of the constitution of India, consequently direct the respondents to fix the Management Quota, Fee Structure and Staff Salaries to the petitioner institution (D.Ed. Course) as per law fo the academic Year 2007-08, and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.S.A.K.MYNUDDIN Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO.21538 of 2007 ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ____________ (G.ROHINI,J) 29th April 2009 RRB