WP(C) 6496/2003 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE A.POTSANGBAM Heard Mr.A.Roshid, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in both the writ petitions and Mrs. R.Gogoi, learned Govt. Advocate. [2] As common questions of law and identical facts are involved in b oth the writ petitions, they are taken up together for disposal by this common o rder. [3] In both the writ petitions, the petitioners therein have been en gaged as Helpers to Supervisors, subject to approval of the Director, Social Wel fare, Assam, Guwahati-1, vide order dated 24.01.2000 issued by the Child Develop ment Project Officer, I.C.D.S. Project Lala, Hailakandi. By the impugned order d ated 27.02.2003, in both the cases, the engagements of the aforesaid petitioners have been cancelled due to non-receipt of approval from the Director, Social We lfare, Assam, Guwahati-1. The only question now raised by the petitioners is th at before the cancellation order was issued, they were not given any notice. [4] Having considered the nature of the appointments as purely condi tional and subject to the approval of the Director, Social Welfare, Assam, it i s not understandable as to how the petitioners would have been entitled to a no tice before the cancellation order was issued. Mr.A.Roshid, learned counsel appe aring for the petitioners has been asked by the Court as to whether the petition ers, in the nature of appointments, are entitled to notice before the impugned c ancellation order was issued. Mr.Roshid is not able to satisfy that the petition ers are entitled to any notice. [5] I do not find any enforceable right of the petitioners in these two cases and accordingly, both the writ petitions are dismissed as devoid of me rit.