,.^-;;^&^ ''''-••p-^^. ^yvy^ 'v % :^;^, '4 \!s •^ i®! !wi s ./^ ^ 'l^ r> •) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. HON'BLE SHRI N.K. AGARWAL, J. Misc Appeal (C) No. 1386 of 2008. Appellants Claimants ;'-" Non-aDplicants 1 Kanhaiya Patel, S/o Late Dhaniram, aged about 50 years, 2 Kumari Satwatin Patel, D/o Kanhaiyalal Patel,aged about 10 years. 3 Kumari Durga, D/o Kanhailal Patel, aged about 10years. Appellant No.2 and 3 through natural guardian appellant No.1 All R/o viilag^-Turkadeeh, Post Bhutku, Tahsil an^kOistricl^ilaspur (C.G.). VERSUS 1 Chandram, S/o Bahoran Ram, aged about 37 years, R/o Sondeeh, P.S. Akaltara, District Janjgir Champa, Presently resident at Near Electric Sub- station, Ashok Nagar, P.S. Sarkanda, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.). 2 Bisheshwar Singh, S/o Jodhan Singh, aged about 50 years, R/o Seepat Chowk, Sarkanda, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G). 3 The New India Insurance Company Liited, Through The Branch Manager, Opposite Rajeev Plaza, Bus stand Road, Bilaspur (C.G.). Miscellaneous appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act Present : None for the appellants. Shri Deepak Gupta, counsel for respondent No.3. i?.->E<\ ; •'<•::! M.A.C.No.1386of2008 ORDER (01SI August,2011) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. None for the appellants. 2) As there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, we are left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge subbu