IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2004 of 2008 RAM SAKHI DEVI Versus THAGAN MAHATO ----------- 4 16.1.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court, any document subsequent to the judgment and decree under appeal could not have been held to be necessary document for being taken on record by way of additional evidence by the appellate court. The evidence recorded in the judgment under appeal has to be necessarily gone into on the basis of the position that was existing as on the date of the judgment. Since the documents filed by the petitioner were definitely one relating to subsequent event after judgment was passed by the trial court, they had no evidentiary value for the purpose of adjudicating the issue involved in the suit and consequently, were rightly not taken into additional evidence. Such order therefore, does not suffer from any infirmity and accordingly, this civil revision application is dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)