{1} FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CA/12685/2008 In RC/3119/2003 WITH CA/12686/2008 In RC/3106/2003 WITH CA/12687/2008 In RC/416/2004 WITH CA/12688/2008 In RC/2962/2003 Office notes, office memorandum of coram, appearances, court’s order or directions and Registrar’s order. Court’s or Judge’s orders Smt. R.R.Mane, AGP for the State / applicant. *** Coram : K.U.Chandiwal, J. Date: 30th June 2009. 01- Heard Learned AGP. There is delay of 751 days in causing to file appeal seeking to challenge order dated 15th Feb., 2001 in LAR No.292/1995. The State applied for certified copies which were received. The concerned District Government Pleader forwarded the proposal to prefer appeal to the Law and Judiciary Department vide letter dated 13th MaY 2003. Resolution to this effect was passed and forwarded the proposal to the Government Pleader Officer and it was received on 15th May 2003. 02- The delay is though exorbitant, needs consideration as it was unintentional not deliberate. It should not foreclose the existing rights of the State as the learned Judge by {2} considering the sale instances at Ex.34 has made enhancement for the land acquired in the year 1987 while the sale instances are of 1992. The learned Judge has also considered the order in LAR No.223/1997 [Ex.50]. The State feels that these observations are contrary to the settled law. The States right need not be foreclosed. The delay is not deliberate. The applications allowed. Delay condoned. 03- Notices in the appeal to the original claimants returnable on 07the January 2010. 04- Call R & P. [K.U.CHANDIWAL] JUDGE /mda/0609/ca12685.08