^n^T^T f<Tli<=t) 3TI^T 5b^ict» ^f^a 7L ~s^ -^ww^, ^Ti1<i<i<o, f^<ni^i< 31T^?T 'q^ra? ^W^\{ ^^^——*—•*—•—*•——^^ ^^ 'fN^T' 3TI^T'^TT^R ^Tf^T (Sinale Bench: Hon'b Writ P^ PETITIONER (Petition under Art. ^ Lucky N^ 5, Veer District R|aipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS 1. Managing Marketing 2. Joint Dir^ Marketing | 3. Mr. Ujaga^ Chhattisg^ near Old Q 08.12.2008 Mr. Ashok Soni, Advocate for Mr. Lokesh Singh, Advocate f^ absorb/regularize the petitioner as re| salary and all other emoluments to wt] Learned counsel for the petiti(| appointed as Driver by respondent N^ brief period in the year 2002 (Anne^ orally terminated and his applicatiorl been considered because ofthe pencj Since there is nothing on re<| after due selection process and his petition being without any substance| same is hereby dismissed. chl^<n<4lT1 'RTTOf ^ ft^ <psi^l< ^ ^rf^FT ^TT^T e Mr. Justice Dhirendra Mishral titipn No.2924/03 26/227 of Constitution of India) ik, Aged 24 years, Son of Lakhpati Naik, R/o 8/D- Savarkar Nagar, Kheerapur Cplony, Tehsil and ersus Director, Chhattisgarh State Agricultural Mandi Board, Raipur (CG) ictor Works, Chhattisgarh State Agricultural Mandi Board, Raipur (CG) Singh, Son of - not known, Managing Director, rh State Agricultural Marketirig Mandi Board, lajmandi, Raipur (CG) ;he petitioner. )r the respondents. Heard. The petitioner has filed the ins|tant petition for a direction to the respondents to }ular employee and to pay the petitioner regular lich the petitioner is entitled. •ner submits that earlier the petitioner was orally ).1 on 14.8.2001 and thereafter, he worked for a ure P-2). However, he has been subsequently for fresh appointment as Driver has also not ency ofthe instant petition. ;ord to show that the petitioner was appointed ^laim is based on oral appointment, the instant deserves to be dismissed and accordingly^the Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge