IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-5712 of 2011 Date of decision : 27.4.2011 Naresh Kumar … Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.C.PURI Present: Mr.A.S.Sullar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Amandeep Singh, AAG, Haryana. K.C.Puri, J. As per allegation of the prosecution, the petitioner alongwith other accused has taken active part in the occurrence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the name of the petitioner is not mentioned in the FIR, so, he is entitled to concession of regular bail. I have considered the said facts. Four eye witnesses have specifically named the petitioner. They have been examined and all of them have given attribution to the petitioner. No ground for grant of regular bail to the petitioner is made out. Dismissed. ( K.C. Puri) Judge 27.04.2011 sd