IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWPs No. 9545, 9563, 10013, 10029 & 10030 of 2011. Decided on: 23rd November, 2011. 1. CWP No. 9545 of 2011-E. Pritam Chand & others. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 2. CWP No. 9563 of 2011-G. Paras Ram. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 3. CWP No. 10013 of 2011-B. Vijay Kumar. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 4. CWP No. 10029 of 2011-C. Bhim Singh & anr. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 5. CWP No. 10030 of 2011-C. Roop Lal & anr. Vs. State of H.P. & others. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG, for the Respondets-State. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim the benefit of the decision of the Supreme Court in Mool Raj Upadhyaya vs. State of H.P., 1994 Supp. (2) SCC 316 and claim work charge status on completion of ten years of daily waged service with 240 days 2 per year. In any case, as rightly pointed out by the learned Deputy Advocate General, there cannot be work charge status prior to 1.1.1994. The claim for regularization will be considered only subject to the availability of vacancies. All these aspects, the petitioners pray, they may be permitted to bring to the notice of the third respondent. It is open to them to do so. In the event of the petitioners filing appropriate representation(s) furnishing their service particulars, the matter will be considered and appropriate action will be taken in accordance with law within four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with the representation(s) by the petitioner concerned before the third respondent. 2. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 23rd November, 2011. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (tr/kck) Judge. 3