1510wp544.09.odt 1 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Writ Petition No.544 of 2009 (Ananta Uttamrao Nagargoje .vs. State and Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Coram: D.D.Sinha and P.B.Varale, JJ. Date : 15/10/2009. Heard Mr. K. S. Narwade, Adv. for petitioner and Mr.A.S.Fulzele, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondents. Counsel for petitioner states that the grievance of petitioner is in respect of conduct of Mr.Surendra Gandam, Police Inspector, who was then attached to Police Station, Mahagaon, Mr.G.B.Bisney, Deputy Inspector then attached to Police Station, Mahagaon and Mr.Shrejode, P.S.I. attached to Police Station, Mahagaon. Counsel for petitioner has submitted that these Police Officer who were attached to said Police Station favoured accused in some of the Criminal cases and therefore, enquiry was ordered by Special Inspector General of Police, Amravati which was conducted by Inquiry Officer and 1510wp544.09.odt 2 . some adverse report was also submitted to the Special I.G. In the backdrop of the above referred facts, we do not propose to show any indulgence. However, counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw present petition with liberty to file representation in this regard to the Inspector General of Police and prayed that, if such representation is made, the Inspector General of Police may be asked to decide the same within a stipulated period. In the circumstances, the Criminal Writ petition is disposed of with liberty, as prayed for. If such representation is made by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today, we expect the Inspector General of Police to decide the same in accordance with law on its own merits within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of such representation. We want to make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion one way or the other on merits of the matter. It is for the Inspector General of Police to consider the representation of petitioner purely on its own merits and in accordance with law. JUDGE JUDGE jais 1510wp544.09.odt 3 .