HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR \^ Wlisc. Civil CaseNo.70 of 2011 APPLICANTS/: (Appellants) NON-APPLICANT/: (Plaintiff) 1. Bahoran Prasad Upadhyay S/o Late shri Pyarelal, aged about60 years, R/o Bhaturra, Nayapara, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. Arun KumarS/o Bahoran Prasadaged about ' 20years, R/o Bhaturra, Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. Manharan Lal 4. Dilharan Lal 5. Shiokumar 6. Raj Kumar 7. Rajendra Kumar 8. Jaswan Kumar All above No.3 to8 are sons of Late Shri Atmaran, 9. , Smt. Sukhiya Bai W/o Late Shri Atmaran, , Atl R/o Samdil Tahsil & District Bilaspur (C.G^ . i ..::'.,•••, Versus Kriparam S/o Pyarelal aged about 55 years, R/o Bhakurra, Nawapara, tahsil & Distt. Bilaspur(C.G.) {AppliGationfor recalling of order dated 7-9-2010 and restoration of S.A.No.448/1995} Present: Mr. Ram KumarTiwari.counsel fortheapplicants. Sinale Bench: Hon'ble hflr. T.P. Sharma, J ORALORDER (14-2-2011) 1. Heard on I.A.No.1 for condonation bf delay in filing the application for restoration. - <-" . . . 2. Present application for restoration has been preferred after thirty-three daysof itslimitation. 3. On due consideration, I.A.No.1 is allowed. Delay in filing theapplication, for restoration is hergby condoned. 4. Also heardon the application forrestoration. ^?^"Kw?^BSiffigi^ Soma iBMB -y. ^^^^^^^ :;??;^'^;&S!sR?^&®i 5. On due consideration,! am satisfied that theapplicants haye been^tsl® toexplain thecause for non-appearancewhen the casewas called out fbrhearing. Consequently, the application for restoration is also allowed. Orderdated 7-9-201 Opassed in S.A.No.448/95 is herebyrecalled. S.A. No.448/95 be restored toitsoriginal number. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge '^';^K-;'^3^3E^S '•^^^s^,^