5 ^ 1 <:\s.^o;- IN HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (c) N0.^?^ OF 2008 PETITIONERS Vs RESPONDENTS 1. Kicche Joga, son of Shri Hidma, aged about 38 years. ,2. Soyam Lachcha, son of Shri Hunga, aged about 25 years. Both are residing in Salwa Judum Relief Camp, Dornapal, Tehsil Sukma, District 'Dantewada (CG). 1. The Election Commission of India through the Secretary, Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi-110001. 2. The Chief Electoral Officer, Chhattisgarh, Raipur. ^3. The District Election Officer/ Collector, District South Bastar. 4. The Returning Officer Legislative Constituency No.90-Konta, District South Bastar. PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF TH E CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^> HSGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BiLASPUR WRIT PETiTION (C) N0. 6778 OF 2008 PetitsQners Respondents Versus6 Kicche Joga & Another The Eiection Commission ofindla & Others WRiT PETITiON UNDER ARTSCLE226 OF THE CONSTJTUT!ON OF INDiA (SB : Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri,J.) Present:- Shri Vivek Chopra, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panei Lawyer for the State/ respondent No.3. Shri Jitendra Pali; Advocate for the respondents No. 1, 2& 4. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on 26th day of October, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that since the eiection petition has aiready been filed, the instant petition has become infructuous. 2. Learned counsei appearing for other side do not controvert the above submission. 3. in view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed, as having become infructuous. r 1 Satish K. Agnihotri 1 Judge asnok