1 wp 2744.92 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2744 OF 1992 Babasaheb S/o Sopanrao Veer .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri N. T. Bhagat, Advocate for the Petitioner. Smt. R. K. Ladda, A.G.P. for the Respondent/State. Shri Vivek Bhavthankar, Advocate for the Respondent No. 4. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 11TH JULY, 2011. PER COURT : . Shri Bhagat, the learned counsel states that during the pendency of petition, the petitioner has completed his D. Ed. Course and he has also left the service of the present respondent. 2. This Court had initially granted interim relief in terms of prayer clause “F-1” thereby the execution and operation of the impugned termination order was stayed. 2 wp 2744.92 3. As the petitioner has left the service of the present respondent, nothing would survive in the writ petition. As such, the writ petition is disposed of. Rule is discharged. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/July 11