IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3658 of 2005 Sachidanand Prasad Sinha, son of Late Raghunandan Prasad Singh, Mohalla Jail Press, Shastri Nagar (Jadubanshi Nagar), 1/A Road, Gaya, PS Rampur, District Gaya – Petitioner. Vs. 1) The Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. 2) The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. 3) Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. 4) Principal, Gaya College, Gaya. 5) Barsar, Gaya College, Gaya – Respondents. 8 4.1.2011 The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the order of his termination, dated 19.4.2000. The petitioner was appointed on daily wages in Gaya College, Gaya. The Principal of the college has sent a list to the Vice Chancellor of the University recommending the name of the petitioner as an employee of Gaya college for the purpose of regularization under the staffing pattern. Annexure 4 is the letter, dated 17.11.1998 of the Vice Chancellor which indicates those employees who came under the staffing pattern. The name of the petitioner finds place in the said list. Apparently there was a dispute between the petitioner and another employee of the college for which a criminal case was instituted. The petitioner was asked to show cause as to why he should not be terminated for his misbehavior in the premises of the college. The petitioner faced trial in the criminal case and was acquitted by giving benefit of doubt vide judgment contained in Annexure 8. After the acquittal the petitioner filed an application before the Vice Chancellor that he should now be reinstated in service as there is no criminal case pending against him and specially in view of the fact that the charges could not be proved 2 as the person with whom the petitioner had entered into a fight had not deposed in court to support the allegations made against the petitioner. The matter remains pending before the Vice Chancellor. The Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya is, therefore, directed to examine as to whether the petitioner comes within the staffing pattern and was working against the sanctioned post as approved by the State of Bihar and thereafter take a decision with respect to whether the petitioner will be entitled to reinstatement in his service in view of his acquittal in the criminal case. I may make it clear that the daily wagers would otherwise have no right of regularization unless their services have been duly approved by the concerned authorities. The decision should be taken within a period of six months from the date of filing of representation by the petitioner. This writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)