(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 8520 OF 2010 Chintaman s/o. Ukhardu Patil, Age : Major, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Pimpri, Taluka : Muktainagar, District : Jalgaon, .. Petitioners and 7 others. (Original applicants) versus Vikas s/o. Ramu Patil, Age : Major, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Naigaon, Taluka : Muktainagar, District : Jalgaon, and 7 others. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. M.K. Deshpande, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. D.R. Korde, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos.6 to 8. ........................ CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 2ND FEBRUARY 2011 (2) COURT'S ORDER : 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent nos.6 to 8. 2. The mutation entries and change therein effected long back i.e. in 1984, were sought to be assailed before Additional Divisional Commissioner. The Additional Commissioner has found that mutation entries were carried as per partition in 1984 and the same were challenged for the first time in the year 2003. 3. I do not find any jurisdictional error or perversity. The mutation entries are only for fiscal purposes and if any right of petitioner is violated, he is free to take recourse to civil remedy. The petition is, therefore, not entertained. 4. In the result, the petition is dismissed. ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp8520