IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 19TH DECEMBER 2011 / 28TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 33458 of 2011(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- C.M.UMMER,CHEMBALAKKATTIL HOUSE, AVINATTAKANZHI ROAD,PORKULAM PO,THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR 680 001. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR 680 001. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEDUPUZHA POLICE STATION,THRISSUR DISTRICT 680 015 SR.GOVT.PLEADER SMT.M.J.RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.33458/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE REGISTRATION OF CERTIFICATE OF VEHICLE NO.KL-13-L-6010 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE SAND PASS ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER'S VEHICLE EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE , DATED 21/1/2011 EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR DATED 11/11/2010 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 33458 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 19th day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T Ext.P3 order passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate exercising his powers under the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001 is under challenge. 2. Ext.P3 order was passed as early as on 21/6/11 and is sought to be challenged at this distance of time and that too without availing of the statutory remedy of revision or appeal. That apart, the order itself shows that the petitioner did not appear for hearing pursuant to the notice issued by the Sub Divisional Magistrate. In such circumstances, I see no reason to entertain the writ petition at this distance of time. Writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp //True Copy// PA to Judge