mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICTION NO. 27 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLN.NO.45 of 2007 Kailashan K. Nair .. Applicant versus Major V.J.Joseph & Anr. .. Respondents ... Mr.Shirish Gupte i/b Prakash Naik for the applicant. Mr.R.V.Govilkar i/b M/s.Roys Law Firm for respondent no.1. Smt.M.M. Deshmukh APP for the state. CORAM : D.G.KARNIK, J DATED : 16th January 2008 P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the respondent no.2 and learned APP for the State. 2. Revision Application against the sentence has been admitted. The sentence imposed is of three months Simple Imprisonment and fine of Rs.2,000/-. Fine has been paid. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent no.2 submitted that the bail should not be granted unless the amount of compensation as ordered by the learned Magistrate is deposited in the court. Since prima facie case has been made out, revision application has been admitted. The applicant has examined the Managers of the Banks who have proved the statements of accounts at Exhibits D1, D2, D3 and D4. From the said statement of accounts, it appears that the revision applicant has paid to the respondent no.2 over rupees one crore. The respondent no.2 has not produced his books of accounts. In the circumstances, I am inclined to grant bail without insisting upon deposit of compensation. Hence, I pass the following order:- O R D E R O R D E R O R D E R . Applicant is granted bail in the sum of Rs.One lakh with two sureties of the like amount subject to the condition that the applicant shall not leave the country without prior permission of the court. (D.G. KARNIK, J)