wp4452.11 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4452 OF 2011 1) Damodhar s/o Baburao Dhumal, R/o-Talegaon, Tq-Dharur, Dist-Beed and others. ...PETITIONERS. VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra, Through its Principal Secretary, Co-operative, Marketing and Textile Department, Maharashtra State, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 and others. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri.R.N. Dhorde Advocate with Shri. R.L. Kute Advocate h/f. Shri. V.R. Dhorde Advocate for Petitioners. Shri.T.S. Lodhe, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5. Shri.N.B. Khandare Advocate for Intervenors. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND T.V. NALAWADE, JJ. DATE : 21ST NOVEMBER, 2011. wp4452.11 2 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners submits that the voters list is prepared against the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing ( Regulation) Rules,1967. 3. Shri. Khandare, learned counsel appearing for Intervenors submits that election process has already set in motion. Nomination papers are filed and the date of scrutiny is also over. 4. In the light of the statement made by learned counsel Shri. Khandare and in view of the fact that election programme is declared on 29th September, 2011 (Page No.132 of the Petition), and election process is already set in motion, in exercise of extra ordinary writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution wp4452.11 3 of India, we are not inclined to interfere in the matter. The parties are at liberty to resort to alternate remedies as permissible in law. With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. [T.V. NALAWADE, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] asb/NOV11