HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.31 of 2011 ORDER: This revision is directed against the order, dated 10-08- 2010 in Crl.M.P.No.484 of 2009 in M.C.No.215 of 2009 on the file of the Family court, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B.Nagar. The petitioner is the wife of the respondent. She filed M.C.No.215 of 2009 claiming maintenance at the rate of Rs.20,000/- per month. She also moved Crl.M.P.No.484 of 2009 seeking interim maintenance. The respondent-husband opposed for grant of interim maintenance. The learned Judge of the Family Court on considering the material brought on record and on hearing the counsel appearing for the parties, directed the respondent-husband to pay Rs.3,000/- per month towards interim maintenance from the date of the petition by order, dated 10-08-2010. The said order is assailed in this revision. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the material brought on record. It is contended by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the respondent-husband is a Software Engineer drawing a salary of Rs.65,000/- per month and therefore, the quantum of interim maintenance granted by the learned Judge of the family Court is required to be enhanced considerably. I have gone through the order impugned in the revision. The petitioner has not placed any material on record to show that the respondent-husband has been drawing Rs.65,000/- per month. In the absence of any material to prove the earnings of the respondent- husband at Rs.65,000/- per month, the order passed by the learned Judge of the Family Court does not call for interference by this Court in exercise of the powers under Section 397 Cr.P.C. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. ________________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J 1st February, 2011 VJL/SMR