IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.8934 of 2005 Rajesh Kumar Mehta, s/o- Shiv Sahi Mehta of Village Idgar, P.O.- Pothia, P.S.- Forbisganj, District- Araria. …………. Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The D.G.-cum-I.G. of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3. The D.I.G. of Police, Purnia Range, Purnia. 4. The S.P., Purnia-cum-Chairman, C.S.C. Purnia. 5. The S.P. Araria-cum-Member, C.S.C,Purnia. 6. The S.P. Katihar-cum-Member, C.S.C.,Purnia. 7. The S.P. Kishanganj-cum-Member, C.S.C.,Purnia. ………….. Respondents ---------------------------------- with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.8950 of 2005 1. Ranjan Kumar Paswan, s/o- Heman Ram of village Aadirampur, P.O. + P.S. Bhargama, District- Araria. 2. Man Kumar Chanpal, s/o- Sri Bal Krishna Chaupal of village Sukaila, P.O.- Manulahpatti, P.S.- Bhargama, District- Araria. ………. Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The D.G.-cum-I.G. of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3. The D.I.G. of Police, Purnia Range, Purnia. 4. The S.P., Purnia-cum-Chairman, C.S.C. Purnia. 5. The S.P. Araria-cum-Member, C.S.C,Purnia. 6. The S.P. Katihar-cum-Member, C.S.C.,Purnia. 7. The S.P. Kishanganj-cum-Member, C.S.C.,Purnia. …. Respondents ---------------------------------- 4 03.08.2011 Both these matters raise common issue and as such they have been clubbed together and the present order shall govern them. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners seek a direction upon the respondents to appoint them on the post of Constable for which selection process was initiated in the year 2004. In C.W.J.C. No.8934 of 2 2005, the petitioner belongs to OBC category whereas in C.W.J.C. No. 8950 of 2005, petitioners belong to the Scheduled Caste category. The final select list has been attached as Annexure-2. It appears that five persons belonging to OBC category were selected so far as Purnea District is concerned. Similarly, 04 candidates belonging to S.C. category were selected. In none of the writ petitions, the selected candidates have been made party respondents. This Court, in that view of the matter, cannot grant any substantive relief to the petitioner. Learned counsel submits that representations have already been filed on behalf of the petitioners which have not been disposed of till date. It is submitted that this Court may direct the concerned respondents (D.I.G., Purnea Range, Purnea) to consider and dispose of the those representations. Having heard the parties, both the applications are disposed of by the following order: Let the petitioners approach the said respondent (D.I.G., Purnea Range, Purnea) by filing fresh representation within three months from today annexing therewith a copy of the present order whereafter the said respondent shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law as quickly as possible. pkj (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)