cff ^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE COUHT O? CHATTIS&A.RH AT .\^~'^ ,^^ • .^.^. ^^y^ 4^xy '.^>y •V'' ^ tey 2. 3. g^3 /°^ o~~s: -a is-t-i-y ^. BENCH S.B.Kusre, aged about 68 years, Son of late Balaji Kusre, resident of Jawahar Nagar, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) T7E" State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, School Education, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Treasury Officer, Office of Accountant-General, Raipur (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Block Durg, District Durg (C.G.) ^isS5a»ia^^ 'VJMI.T PSTIITIOH UiZDSl:^ AI:lTIOLrIS ^2S O? T' CONSTITUTION .'^i.U''^.^^ S.—I-L^ >TTT i?~^ T^T^^^'^'^Q^Li^L'SL^; Sgi HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON CS) No. 833 of2010 S.B.Kusre. VERSUS RESPO^TDENTS State ofClihattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE COiNSTITUTION OF 1NDIA SB: Hon'Me Shn Satish K. Agmhotri, J. Present: Shri P.R.Patankar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy G.A. for the State/respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 26th day of Febmary-, 2010) With the consent ofleamed counsel appearitig for flie parties, the matter is heard finally, 1. Leained counsel app.earing for fhe petitioner submits that tlie ease, being paynient of retiral benefits matter, may be referred to the pension comnuttee. 2. This Court, in the matter of W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others) and other conneeted mattei-s, directed the Comniittee to consider the matter of retirai dues as tfae disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Goveroment, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Government and others) aiid order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh & Others v. Baijnath Mandal and another). Thus, tliis petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31 of Januaiy, 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642/2004 Bmjnath Mandal (supra) as submitted by leamed counsel appeai-ing for the parties. 3. With the eonsent ofthe parties, ttus petition is accordingly disposed of in tlie same terms i.e. the ofEce ofthe Advocate General is directed to send tiie case to the Conmiittee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the petition from the petitioner and tliis order. Thereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and the ofBcei-s concemed, within a farther period of 15 days. The Coiiimittee shall consider and pass order, in accordaace with law, afler affording proper oppoi-tumty of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the ofEcers' concemed may file additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, includmg pa.ysient of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner be completed within a period offour months from the date of receipt ofa copy ofthis order. 4. The petitioner shall supply extra copy of the petition to tlie leamed counsel appearing for the respondents for forwarding fhe same to tlie Committee. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^ r'JIllt