IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. 2738-M of 2008 Date of Decision: February 04, 2008 Satish Kumar ......Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr.Kapil Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. *** Rajesh Bindal, J.(Oral): Prayer made in the present petition is for direction to respondents No. 1 to 3 to reinvestigate the case bearing FIR No. 171 dated 11.11.2004, under Sections 332,333, 353, 452, 506, 120-B IPC if Police Stattion Pinjore, District Panchkula. It is not disputed that the accused in the aforesaid FIR were acquitted by the trial Court and thereafter the petitioner who is the complainant, had challenged the order of acquittal in a revision before this Court in Criminal Revision No. 2228 of 2006 which was dismissed. Thereafter the petitioner even availed of the remedy of Special Leave Petition before Hon'ble the Supreme Court and there also he failed. Now the prayer is being made for reinvestigation of the case on the ground that Crl. Misc. No. 2738-M of 2008 -2- the incident took place in the school where other teachers and students were also present and further that no effort was made by the investigating officer to ascertain the registration number of the Scorpio and to get recovered the Maruti Car No. CH03-2928, used by the accused in the alleged occurrence. All these facts were well known to the petitioner even at the time of registration of the FIR and also during the pendency of trial. Once that is so, when the accused have already been acquitted, no case is made out for a direction to the official respondents to reinvestigate the case. Dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE February 04, 2008 sunita