IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 24TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 33743 of 2009(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- 1. T.P.BALAKRISHNA PILLAI, DRIVER GRADE I, GENERATION CIRCLE, MOOLAMATTOM. 2. SASI G., DRIVER GRADE I, GENERATION CIRCLE, MOOLAMATTOM. 3. D.PRASANNAN, DRIVER GRADE I, (NOW CASHIER TRAINEE ON WORKING ARRANGEMENT), ELECTRICAL SECTION, PATTAMBI. 4. K.V.RAJU, DRIVER GRADE I, ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION, VAZHATHOPE. BY ADV. SRI.S.RAMESH BABU RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, VAIDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. CHIEF ENGINEER(HRM), VAIDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. SRI.K.S.ANIL, SC, KSEB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 33743 OF 2009 (K) ===================== Dated this the 24th day of November, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioners are Drivers Grade II aspiring for promotion to the post of Drivers Grade I. According to the petitioners, by Ext.P2, although they were decided to be promoted on an earlier occasion, that was kept in abeyance by Ext.P3 order. Ext.P3 order was challenged before this Court in OP No.7866/03, which was disposed of by Ex.tP6 judgment upholding Ext.P2. It is stated that subsequent to Ext.P6 judgment, the benefit of Ext.P6 judgment was extended only to the petitioners in that case and therefore they filed Ext.P8 series of representations claiming the benefit of promotion as given to the petitioners in Ext.P6 judgment. Orders on Ext.P8 series of representations have not been passed and therefore this writ petition is filed. 2. If as stated by the petitioners, in the aforesaid factual situation representations made by them are pending consideration of the 2nd respondent, there is no reason why the 2nd respondent shall not consider the same and pass orders on their representations. WPC 33743/09 :2 : Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition directing the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P8 series of representations if these representations have been received and are pending. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 2 months of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp