IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 16466 of 2008. Decided on: 07.07.2010. _____________________________________________ Khem Singh. … Petitioner. Versus H.R.T.C. and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): It is not disputed by the learned counsel for the parties that the present lis is squarely covered by the principles laid down in the judgment rendered by the Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in Mitter Dev versus H.R.T.C. and others, O.A. No.1437 of 1993 decided on 7th September, 2006. 2. Consequently, the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner strictly as per the principles laid down in the judgment noticed hereinabove within a period of ten weeks from today. The petitioner shall be held entitled 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - to all the consequential benefits if his case is found squarely covered by the judgment referrer to above. 3. With the above observations, the petition stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. July 07, 2010. (sck).