1 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLTE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLIATION NO. 1313 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3427 OF 2009 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5731 OF 2003 Nilima Sadananda Vartak & Ors. ......Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...... Respondents And Shri Sanjay Manikrao Pawar .......Applicant. ----- Mr. J. Shekhar, for the applicant. Ms. Sugandha Deshmukh i/b A.V. Anturkar, for the Petitioner in Writ Petn. No.5731/2003. Mr. Rahul Kulkarni i/b Dr. S. Bhosale, for Respondent No.5 in Writ Petn. No.5731/2003. ---- CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 12TH OCTOBER, 2009. P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the applicant, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent. Learned counsel for the Petitioners has no objection if the applicant is added as party respondent. 2. Hence, the civil application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b). Amendment to be carried out within four weeks from today. 2 3. The civil application is disposed of accordingly. (A.A. SAYED J.) (SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.)