BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Fourteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.16057 of 2011 SOOMBAL @ CHOCKKALINGAM ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.2 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANOOR POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DT. (CR.NO.380/2011) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.RAGAVENTHRE Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is the second respondent in crime No.380 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for offence under Sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b) and 302 IPC. The petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 10.10.2011. He has come forward with this petition seeking bail. 2. Heard Mr.V.Kathirvelu, learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the state. 3. The learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner has been in Judicial custody from 10.10.2011. He would further submit that the other co-accused have been granted bail by the Sessions Court. He would further submit that the petitioner is ready to abide any conditions likely to be imposed by this Court and he will not abscond from the clutches of law. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the earlier bail application filed by the petitioner was dismissed by this Court in Crl.OP(MD)No.14542 of 2011 by order dated 23.11.2011. He would further submit that the investigation is still pending. 5. considering the submissions made on either side this Court could see that the earlier bail application of the petitioner in Crl.OP(MD) No.14542 of 2011 was dismissed by this Court by order dated 23.11.2011. There is no change of circumstances in this case, Further, the order passed by the Sessions Court by granting bail to the other co-accused, is not applicable to the petitioner who is on a different footing. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 14/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANOOR POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, PALAYAMKOTTAI 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. GH : 19.12.2011 : 2P/4C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16057 of 2011 Date :14/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/