1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER Peera Ram & Ors. Vs. State of Raj.& Ors. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6217/2008 Date of Order : : 26/08/2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr.C.S.Rajpurohit, for the petitioners. BY THE COURT: The only grievance of the petitioners is that the respondents want to construct a road under the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (for short “the NAREGA Scheme” hereinafter) in Khasra No.587, 588 and 589 without there being any sanction. According to learned counsel for the petitioners, the land stands in the name of petitioners, who have recorded as Khatedars and there is no Gair Mumkin Rasta in the said Khasras and the respondents are planning to construct the road. 2 It appears that the respondent-District Collector has already made an endorsement on the application of the petitioners that no such way be constructed in the land of Khatedar-tenants. Even otherwise, if the petitioners have any grievance, the petitioners are permitted to make a detailed representation to the respondent No.4 the Project Officer, NAREGA, Panchayat Samiti, Jalore as also the respondent No.1 District Collector, Jalore ventilating their grievances within a period of one week from today and if such a representation is made by the petitioners, the respondents shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law. With these directions, the writ petition is disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR), J. NK 3 S.B.CIVIL MISC.STAY APPLICATION NO.10929/2008 IN S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6217/2008 Date of Order : : 26/08/2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr.C.S.Rajpurohit, for the petitioners. Since the writ petition itself has been disposed of, the stay petition stands also disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR), J. NK