IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.1034 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 24.8.2010 Army Group Ins.Fund … Appellant Versus Daya Singh and others …Respondents LPA No.1035 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 24.8.2010 Army Group Ins.Fund AGIF … Appellant Versus Ram Mehar Singh …Respondent LPA No.1036 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 24.8.2010 Army Group Ins.Fund … Appellant Versus Krishan Kumar and others …Respondents LPA No.1039 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 24.8.2010 Army Group Ins.Fund … Appellant Versus Dharmbir …Respondent Coram: Hon’ble Mr.Justice M.M.Kumar Hon’ble Ms.Justice Ritu Bahri Present: Mr.Akshy Kumar Goyal, Advocate for Mr.P.S.Ghuman, Advocate for the appellant(s). 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M.Kumar, J. This order shall dispose of LPA No.1034 of 2010, LPA No.1035 of 2010, LPA No.1036 of 2010 and LPA No.1039 of 2010 as the same have arisen out of the impugned judgment dated 8.9.2009 rendered by learned Single Judge. The instant appeal filed under Clause X of Letters Patent, is directed against judgment dated 8.9.2009 rendered by learned Single Judge while disposing of the writ petition. LPA No.1034 of 2010 (O&M) While issuing notice of motion, the Central Govt. Standing Counsel, who was present in the Court, has accepted the notice on behalf of Assistant Solicitor General. However, Mr.Akshay Kumar Goel, learned counsel for the appellant has pointed out that 5th respondent i.e. Secretary, Army Group Insurance Fund, Rao Tula Ram Marg, Post Bag No.14, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi was not represented. No notice was even issued to them. Learned counsel has further pointed out that on reading of the penultimate para of the judgment, a specific direction has been issued to 5th respondent while allowing the writ petition to release disability fund recovered under Army Group Insurance Fund Act, for his disability. The grievance may be that without serving any notice on 5th respondent, the direction has been issued to their prejudice. It has been submitted that 5th respondent is to provide insurance money on account of disability suffered and not to provide any pension in lieu of the disability. We have heard learned counsel for the writ- petitioner/appellant. We are of the considered opinion that proper course available to the appellant is to avail appropriate remedy before the learned Single Judge for correction of any error in the order that has been pointed out to us. Accordingly, appeal is disposed of with liberty to the appellant to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law. A photo copy of this order be placed on the file of each connected case. (M.M.Kumar ) Judge (Ritu Bahri) Judge 24.08.2010 sd 2