1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4367 OF 2008 (M/s. B.P. Byramji & Co. & Ors. vs. Union of India) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. OCTOBER 08, 2008. Heard Shri Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Gordey with Shri Agrawal, learned counsel for the respondent. In view of the orders passed in Writ Petition No. 3671 of 2008, I find that the impugned order in this petition, permitting the respondent to rely on documents, also warrants no interference. Shri Shrivastava, learned counsel states that total 18 documents are sought to be produced after closure of evidence of the petitioners and seven out of them were exhibited in execution proceedings also. According to him, 11 are the new documents and there are no justifiable or sufficient reasons pleaded pointing out that those documents could not be produced on record earlier. It is apparent that the documents are filed along with the application for amendment and in application for amendment it has been mentioned 2 that old records were traced out. The petitioners will get an opportunity to test those documents in cross examination. Shri Shrivastava, learned counsel has pointed out to this Court that evidence of the petitioners/ plaintiffs is already over. In view of the amendment, the petitioners – plaintiffs are free to amend their pleadings and also lead additional evidence in support, if they so desire. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.