IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21104 of 2009 CHIGAR RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 02.07.2009 Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under sections 363,366A and subsequently sections 372,376,373/ 34 IPC. were added. As per allegations in the FIR, the petitioner kidnapped/abducted three minor daughters of the informant. From the statements made by two of them before the learned Magistrate under section 164 Cr.P.C., it is apparent that the petitioner is the main culprit in kidnapping who subsequently indulged in commission of rape. It is contended that the petitioner is in custody since 16.11.2006. Learned counsel fairly states before this court that the trial has been taken up but uptill now only four witnesses on behalf of the prosecution have been examined. Having considered the submissions and after going through the materials on record, this Court while rejecting the present application observes as under: “Let the trial court make endeavour to examine all the witnesses on behalf of the prosecution on or before 30th of October,2009, failing which the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.” hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )