IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.56087 of 2007 NARESH YADAV @ NARESH PRASAD Versus THE STATEOF BIHAR ----------- 3 6.5.2008 Heard both sides. The petitioner is the father in law of the deceased. He is made accused in a case instituted under sections 304(B)/201 and 34 I.P.C. Counsel for the petitioner submits that F.I.R. has been lodged as if the informant is the eye-witness to the occurrence. According to the counsel, there is no eye witness to the occurrence. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that the witnesses of the village have not supported the manner of occurrence as alleged in the F.I.R. It has been submitted that the husband of the deceased is in jail. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner, on account of the said allegation, is in custody since 12.1.2006. Regard being had to the facts indicated above particularly the fact that the petitioner remained in custody for over two years, this Court is inclined to admit the petitioner on bail. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner Naresh Yadav @ Naresh Prasad is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Learned Court of F.T.C.-II, Patna in connection with Naubatpur P.S. case no. 141/05 (S. Tr. No. 708/2007). pkj (Kishore K. Mandal, J)