IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 30TH MAY 2011 / 9TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 14467 of 2011(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.SHIBU, ADVOCATE, FEBA BHAVAN, ANAMUGHAM ROAD, VENGODE.P.O., SHEEMAMULA JUNCTION, VATTAPARA, NEDUMANGAD. BY ADV. SRI.S.M.PREM RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TRIVANDRUM. 3. SUNIL, THADATHARIKATH ROAD, SHEEMAMULA JUNCTION, VATTAPARA, NEDUMANGAD. 4. SANAL, THADATHARIKATH ROAD, SHEEMAMULA JUNCTION, VATTAPARA, NEDUMANGAD. 5. ANIL, THADATHARIKATH ROAD, SHEEMAMULA JUNCTION, VATTAPARA, NEDUMANGAD. 6. OMANA, THADATHARIKATH ROAD, SHEEMAMULA JUNCTION, VATTAPARA, NEDUMANGAD. GP SRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).14467/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 30th day of May, 2011 JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance projected in the writ petition has already been taken up by filing Ext.P1 which is pending consideration before the second respondent and the petitioner would be satisfied if a direction is given to the second respondent to have it finalised within a reasonable time. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. Considering the limited nature of the relief, this Court does not find it necessary to deal with the merits of the case nor is it necessary to issue notice to respondents 3 to 6 for the time being. 3. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of directing the second respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P1 in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as respondents 3 to 6 and others concerned, if any. Final orders W.P.(C).14467/2011 2 as above shall be passed as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with the copy of the writ petition before the second respondent for taking further steps. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, Judge mrcs