1 c.a.4199.00 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL (REVIEW) APPLICTION NO. 4199 OF 2000 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 615 OF 2000 Panjumal Gagandas Tekwani ...APPLICANT VERSUS The Municipal Council, Beed. ...RESPONDENT ... Mr.A.S.Gaikwad, Advocate holding for Mr.S.M.Godsay,Advocate for Applicant. Mr.G.K. Naik Thigale,Advocate for respondent. ... CORAM: S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 5TH OCTOBER, 2011 PER COURT : . Heard. 2. The review applicant herein is original applicant in Misc. Civil Application NO. 106 of 2005. In the said application, he claimed compensation of the acquired land, which was acquired by the respondent for public purpose. The said Misc. Civil Application came to be decided 2 c.a.4199.00 finally by the judgment and order on 29.02.2000, by the learned IV Additional District Judge, Beed. Clause (6) of the operative part of the said order reads thus: “6. The petitioner shall pay and deposit the requisite Court fees on the total compensation amount so awarded by this Court within three weeks from the date of this Order.” 3. The review applicant herein filed Review Application before the learned IV Additional District Judge, Beed to review the clause [6] of the operative part of the said order, on the ground that the Court fees is not payable. However, the said application came to be rejected by the learned IV Additional District Judge, Beed vide its order dated 04.04.2000. 4. Being aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner/review applicant herein had filed Civil Revision Application No. 615 of 2000. The Said Civil Revision Application came to be rejected by 3 c.a.4199.00 this Court vide order dated 10.07.2000. This Civil Application is filed seeking review of the said order. 5. During pendency of this application, the review applicant has deposited the Court fees in compliance with the directions in clause [6] of the order, passed by the learned IV Additional District Judge, Beed. Since the clause [6] of the said order has been complied with, in my opinion nothing further survives for consideration in the present Civil (Review) Application and same stands disposed off. . It is needless to mention that, the applicant to take proper steps for execution of the impugned judgment and order dated 29.02.2000, passed by the learned IV Additional Sessions Judge, Beed, in Misc. Civil Application No. 106 of 1995, in accordance with law. Sd/- [S.S. SHINDE, J.] MTK 4 c.a.4199.00