1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi COMPANY PETITION NO. 801 OF 2009. Deepak J. Chandarana. ..Petitioner. vs. Shreechem Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent. .... Mr. N.R. Mody, a/w Shweta Doshi, i/b. Rustamji & Ginwala, for Petitioner. Mr. Atul Shah, Accountant, for Respondent. .... CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 11TH MARCH 2010. P.C. The company petition was admitted on 9th December 2009. Thereafter, the petition was advertised on behalf of the petitioner, to which no claims were received. 2. Thereafter, on 21st January 2010, the learned Advocate for the petitioner informed the Court that the parties are trying to settle the matter and they will be able to tender the consent terms by next week. This was also confirmed by Mr. Atul Shah, Accountant of the respondent company. Since the company petition was admitted and advertised, the petitioner 2 was directed to advertise the proposed withdrawal in the same two newspapers in which the the admission of the petition was advertiesed and invite objections/claims from the creditors and/or any other person having objection to the said withdrawal by giving at least 10 days clear notice. The petition was adjourned to 4th February 2010. 3. On 4th February 2010, it was realised that the petitioner instead of advertising the proposed withdrawal in the "Free Press Journal" and "Maharashtra Times", advertised in the "Free Press Journal" and "Navshakti". The petitioner was therefore, directed to advertise the proposed withdrawal also in the "Maharashtra Times". Accordingly, the petitioners have advertised the proposed withdrawal in the "Maharashtra Times" dated 26th February 2010, as can be seen from the affidavit proving publication dated 2nd March 2010. The learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner states that pursuant to the said advertisement, no claims are received by him from any workers/ creditors of the company. 4. The learned Advocate for the petitioner tenders the minutes of the order dated 11th March 2010 and has prayed that 3 the order dated 9th December 2009 be set aside and the company petition be disposed of in terms of the minutes of the order dated 11th March 2010. The minutes of the order are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. 5. Under the circumstances, the order dated 9th December 2009, is set aside and the company petition is disposed of in terms of the minutes of order marked ‘X’. [ S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. ]