HIGH Comm:- Petitioners Resgondents COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR , Hon’ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra & Hcn’ble Shri R.N. Chandrakar, JJ W.F.(C) No.555i201 0 1. Nikhil Jain, S/o Shri Nirmal Chand Jain, aged about 24 years, Vani Singh, Dlo Shri R.S. Chauhan, aged about 24 years Priyanka Agrawal, D/o Shri R.C. Agrawal, aged about 24 years 4. Vaibhav Motghare, S/o Dr. CB. Motghare, aged about 24 years 5. Neha NAhar, D/o Shri R.L. Nahar, aged about 24 years 6. Prachi Deshmukh, D/o Shri BD. Deshmukh, aged about 24 years 7. Vivek Kumar, S/o Shri Srikant Singh, aged about 24 years 8. Rahul Agrawal, S/o Shri Rajendra Agrawal, aged about 25 years Smriti Ojha, D/o Rajendra Ojha, aged about 24 years Karan Kamatak, S/o SM. Karnatak, aged about 23 years AH are students of BDS Colege, Sundara, Rajnandgaon, Distric- Rajnandgaon (CG) Versus 1 . State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Health and Famiiy Welfare, Mantralaya DKS. Building, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) Dental Council of lndia, New Delhi, through Secretary, AIE. Galib Marg, Kotla Road, Temple y Lane, New Delhi (lndia) Chhattisgarh Dental College and Research lnstitute, Run by Youth Foundation of lndia, a Society, through its Secretary, Sundra, Rajnandgaon (CG) Ll ,1 ., Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia Present: Shri Awadh Tripathi, counsei for the petitioners. Shri UNS. Dec, G.A. for State/respondent No.1. Oral Order (Passed on 6“ of May, 201 0) Per Dhirendra Mishra, J:- Shri'R. Pradhan, Advocate takes notice on behalf of respondent No.2. (2) Shri Jitendra Paii with Shri Varun Shanna, Advocate takes notice on behalf of respondent No.3. (3) Respondents have already been served with a copy of the petition . a (4) Heard on LA. No.02l2010 for taking documents on record. (5) LA. No.02/2010 is allowed. Documents are taken on record. (6) Learned counsei for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in this petition is squareiy covered by the judgment of this Court passed in WP. No.5393/2005 (Smita Jangde & Ors vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors) and other connected writ petitions and prays that this matter may also be disposed of in the terms of the above decision. (7) The above fact is not disputed by learned counsel for the respondents. (8) ln that view of the matter, the instant petition is also disposed of in the terms of the decision passed in the matter of Smita Jangde & Ors vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors (supra). a copy of which is available in the present tile. i r Dhirendra MiShra ~ Judge Sd/- Priya 1