IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.14203 of 2011 Date of Decision : August 05, 2011. Ashok Singh and others .....Petitioners versus The State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.R.K.Arora, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.B.S.Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.B.S.Chahal, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no need to seek any counter reply from the respondents at this stage. The petitioners seek a mandamus to direct the respondents to grant them the benefit of three advance increments on acquiring the higher qualifications, which has been withdrawn by the respondents without any notice or giving opportunity of hearing. CWP No.14203 of 2011 [2] During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the controversy involved in this case stands settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 1.12.2009 passed in CWP No.738 of 2009 (Manjeet Kaur and others versus the State of Punjab and others) which has since been implemented by the Authorities vide order dated 28.4.2011 (Annexure P-11). The present writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner in the light of the aforesaid judgment in Manjeet Kaur's case (supra) as well as the order dated 28.4.2011 (Annexure P-11) and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. August 05, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE