1 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.17 OF 2009 Bebi Fakira Bhatkar ..Applicant V/s. Latifa Shafru Bhatkar & ors ..Respondents Mr.V.P.Dhavale, Advocate, for the Appellant Mr.Aniket P. Ranade, Advocate, for the Respondents CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 30TH JUNE, 2010 P.C. . Here is an unscrupulous litigant who brings a bad name to the Civil process by seeking to obstruct a decree for injunction which was passed in the year 1993 claiming that if he could raise construction on the site, the Plaintiff could not have been in possession & was not entitled to relief of injunction. Applicant-Judgment Debtor cannot point out that the decree has been altered, modified or set aside by any other Court. The 2 decree has been maintained right up to this Court. The Appellant claims that executing Court could not have ordered his removal, without there being a decree to that effect. Thus, he wants his wrong in defying injunction to be sanctified in right to possess. Therefore, there is nothing wrong in the Order passed by the executing Court that the construction raised on the suit land i.e.Gat No.217A, Hissa No.146 should be removed. The Application is, therefore, dismissed. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)