HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITON No.8877 OF 2011 ORDER: Petitioner is the owner of a house constructed in plot No.85 of HUDA, Nandagiri Hills, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. He states that in Plot No.28, which is his neighbourhood, the 3rd respondent is making unauthorized construction. According to him, the respondents 1 and 2 did not furnish copy of the sanctioned plan, if any, in favour of the 3rd respondent and that in spite of his requests, no steps were taken to prevent the unauthorized construction. 2. Heard Sri M.Sudheer Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 and Sri M.V. Durga Prasad, learned counsel for the 3rd respondent. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is two fold. The first is that copy of the sanctioned plan, if any, in respect of Plot No.28 is not being given to him. In all fairness, the learned counsel for the 3rd respondent has furnished a copy of the sanctioned plan. With that, the part of the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. 2. Sofaras the allegation of the petitioner that construction is being made in plot No.28 without leaving any set backs and contrary to the sanctioned plan is concerned, there is a flat denial by the learned counsel for the 3rd respondent. On the other hand, it is alleged that the petitioner himself made construction contrary to the sanctioned plan, so much so the footpath in the area was encroached by him. 3. The plots were purchased at fairly high rates in the open auction and each and every inch of the land is valuable not only for the owners but also for the Municipal Corporation in whom the open lands vests. The open places that are required to be maintained all around the building are for the benefit of not only the occupants of the concerned building, but also the occupants of the neighbourhood buildings. The respondents 1 and 2 are under obligation to ensure that no construction is made either by the petitioner or by the 3rd respondent contrary to the sanctioned plan. 4. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the 2nd respondent to cause inspection of the premises that are being constructed by the 3rd respondent as well as those constructions made by the petitioner. If any defects are noticed, immediate action shall be taken in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J April 06, 2011 KTL