hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 160 OF 2010 IN PIL (L) NO. 33 OF 2010 Durgesh Warti ... Petitioner Versus M.C.G.M. And Others ... Respondents And Nitin V. Sardesai ... Applicant Mr. G.S. Godbole i/by Mr. Shailendra S. Kanetkar for Petitioner. Mr. K.K. Singhvi, Sr. Counsel with Mrs. Shobha Ajitkumar for R. No. 1 B.M.C. Mr. A.M. Kulkarni for Applicant in Chamber Summons No. 160 of 2010. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.V. MORE, JJ. DATED : JUNE 09, 2010 P. C.: The intervener local MLA has moved this court to allow intervention and also modification of the order dated 28.4.2010 only to the limited extent of directing respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 5 to remove construction materials and debris material lying on the walkway surrounding Shivaji Park and make the walkway usable and convenient. Considering the controversy, intervener is allowed to intervene. Secondly in so far as the existing pathway is concerned, it will be open to Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 5 to complete paving and other related work on the entire pathway so as to enable to use the passage to those who use the same. We make it clear that this order will have no effect on the other aspects raised by the Petitioner in the petition filed by him. On behalf of the Corporation, the learned counsel submits that the inspection of the documents sought for by the Petitioner will be given within one week. Stand over for two weeks. (R.V. MORE,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)