1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.88 OF 2007 The Chamber of Tax Consultants and another. ..Petitioners. Versus Union of India and 2 others. ..Respondents. ... Mr.Santosh Narwade, Advocate i/b. M/s. M.P. Vashi & Associates for the petitioners. Mr.B.M. Chaterjee, Advocate for the respondents. ... CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : 2ND JULY, 2009. P.C. :- 1. Counter affidavit has been filed. This Writ Petition is basically filed for quashing notification No.SO 762(E), dated 14.5.2007 being an amendment to the Income Tax Rules, 2007. Rule 12 was substituted and a new Form ITR 1 to 8 were introduced. All other reliefs are consequential to this relief. 2. The learned Counsel for the respondent submits that this was under challenge before the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court has already upheld the notification by its judgment in the case of Union of India & Ors. Vs. Income Tax Bar Asso. Lucknow dated 14th December, 2007 in Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.20367 of 2007 and Civil Appeal No.5941 of 2007. In this view of the matter, nothing survives in the Petition. However, the Counsel for 2 the petitioner submits that the forms in Hindi are not supplied and available. It is stated in the counter that the Forms in Hindi are available in Gazette and in any case this also will not create any problem as the filing of these returns had originally been fixed on 31.7.2007, which was later on extended to 29.2.2008. That period is also over. For these reasons, we do not find merit in the Petition, which is dismissed as such. [BILAL NAZKI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]