1 wp7388.sxw ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7388 OF 2010 Freddy Xavier Misquitta ...Petitioner vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Jitendra G.Damani for the petitioner Mr.Suresh Bhosale, A.G.P for the respondent no.1 Ms Eventa A. Golsalves for respondent no.5 CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 28, 2010 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. According to the petitioner, the property in dispute was the property owned by his deceased father. According to him after the death of father, the name of the mother was entered in the city survey records. Thereafter, the name of the 5th respondent was entered in the city survey records as a person holding ½ share. The said entry was challenged by the petitioner by preferring an appeal under the provisions of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as the said Code). The appeal was dismissed. Even the Second Appeal was dismissed. The revision application preferred by the petitioner has been dismissed by observing that the parties were free to approach the Civil Court for establishing their rights. 2 The submission of the learned counsel is that the entry of the name of the 5th respondent has been made only on the basis of an affidavit. He submitted that the 2 wp7388.sxw 5th respondent has not established any right in respect of the property. 3 The law is well settled. The entry made in the revenue record does not confer any right, title or interest in respect of the immoveable property. Notwithstanding the entries made in the revenue record, the parties can approach the Civil Court and establish their title. In fact, the revisional authority in the impugned order has specifically observed that the issue of title has not been decided and it is open for the parties to approach the Civil Court for establishing their title. 4 Subject to what is observed above, no case for interference is made out. Writ Petition is rejected. JUDGE