skt/- 1 2.arbp.621.09.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 621 OF 2009 JSW Steel Ltd. ...Petitioner. Vs. Subhash Agarwal ...Respondent. ..... Mr.H.Rehman i/by D.H.Law Associates for Petitioners. Mr.Kamlesh R.Tiwari, Advocate for the respondent. ...... CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 9th DECEMBER, 2009. P.C. 1. In this petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 petition, the parties have settled the matter when the matter was fixed for final hearing. Therefore, recirculated on board for filing consent terms. 2. Both the parties and their authorized persons/officers who are present in Court have signed the consent terms. It is also signed by their respective advocates. There is no dispute about the identification, signatures and authorization of the same. The consent terms is taken on record and marked as ‘X’. skt/- 2 2.arbp.621.09.sxw 3. The present petition is disposed of in view of the consent terms. WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3845 OF 2009 1. As the parties have settled the matter, Notice of Motion No. 3845 of 2009 is disposed of as not pressed. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 92 OF 2009 1. Considering the fact that the parties have settled the matter and that there is question of interpretation of orders dated 29 th August 2009 and 12 th October 2009 passed by this Court and based upon the same, this contempt petition has been taken out by the petitioner, I am disposing of this contempt petition also. 2. As the petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is disposed of in view of the consent terms with liberty to both the parties to apply afresh. This contempt petition is also disposed of. [ ANOOP V. MOHTA, J ]