CR No.4450 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CR No.4450 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.07.2010 Maya Devi ....Petitioner Versus Satpal ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. ... Alok Singh, J.(Oral) Plaintiff - petitioner has approached this Court invoking jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, impugning order dated 22.4.2010 thereby closing evidence of the plaintiff. From the perusal of the record, it reveals that on 22.4.2010 statement of PW5 was recorded. No other witness of the plaintiff was present and the plaintiff sought an adjournment, which was declined and his evidence was closed. In the opinion of this Court, a last opportunity ought to have been granted to the plaintiff to produce his entire evidence. CR No.4450 of 2010 2 In the interest of justice and in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, plaintiff is hereby permitted to produce his all witnesses before the trial Court on 4.8.2010. If witnesses are produced by the plaintiff, the trial Court shall proceed in accordance with law. However, if no witness is produced by the plaintiff on the date fixed, then his right to lead evidence shall stand closed. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms without notice to the respondent, at the admission stage. However, it is made clear that if the respondent feels aggrieved from this order, he shall be at liberty to move this Court. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 20.07.2010 sk.