HEGH CGURT OF CHHATTESGARH AT BILASPER WRIT PETITION (C) N6. 882 efzwg Hardayal Singh Agéd.~ 52 years: Sic Sardar Thamnlan Singh, Occupation « Timber Suppiiers, M/s. w M.P. Wood Products, R/o Ravi Nagar, Shukla Colony, Raipur, Distn‘ct — Raipur (CG) VERSUS RESPGNDENES 1 1. State of Chhaftisgarh, Through — The Secretary, Department of Homo & Poiice, Mamralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. 2. The Director General of Police, Chhattisgarh, HQ. Raipua‘. 3. The Lnspector General of Poiiee. Raipur Range, Raipur (C.G.) The Superintendem of Police, Raipur, District Ratpur (C.G.) 5. Shashi Mohan Singh Dv SP. Aged — 37 years S/o Kishun Deo Singh Working as City Superinteiident of Police. Civil Lines Area, Raipur, District — Raipur (C.G.) 6. Ravindra Upadhyay (Iiispector of Police) Aged ~ 52 years, S/o Shri S.K.Upadhyay; Working as ~ Station House Officer, At e Foiice Statioii, Civil Lime, Raipur, District ~ Raipur (C.G.) N R ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA on’ble Shri Satish K. Agnjhotri, J. E‘resent: Shri R.K.Kesharwani. Advocate for the petitioner. Shri ASKaehliwaha, Deputy Advocate General for the State/ Resondent No. I to 4. ?ET!TIONER ORAL QRDER (Passed 011 11“; dav olf February, 2008) Learned counsel appearing for the petiiioner does not want to pres this petition on merit at this stage. However, learned counsel seeks a direction to the respondents to iook into his complaint and pass the aopropriate order in accordance with law. 2. Be that as it may, without expressing any opinion on merit, the respondent No.2 is directed to consider and pass appropriate order on the applications dated 29.11.2007 and 16.11.2007 made by the petitioner in accordance with iaw, as expeditiously as possible. E». In View of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of. No Order asto costs. §Qr~\K Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri: { Judge . WRW PETETYG UNDE SB: E p