IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15795 of 2008 SERAJ ALI ANSARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3/ 22/01/2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by order of his transfer dated 17.9.2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had come to this Court earlier when this Court disposed off the writ application with certain observations which have not bee complied with by the respondents in issuing the impugned order. The ground urged in the present writ application is that he has not been given a posting of his choice as per his option. Subsequently, those who had completed more than three years at their previous place of posting, contrary to Government instructions, are being permitted to continue leading to non- availability of post as per the option of the petitioner. This Court in C.W.J.C. No.10976/08 has already held that any option given by the petitioner does not bind the authorities. The petitioner cannot insist on working as per his terms. The second ground strenuously urged was 2 ‘violation of Article-14 of the Constitution’ inasmuch as the petitioner was being transferred, even while others who had remained at a station for more than three years were left unscathed. The law stands well settled that circulars with regard to transfer and postings create no rights so as to found a legal cause of action. They at best furnish an opportunity to file a representation to be considered by the authorities. The primary grievance of the petitioner at paragraph-12 of the application appears to be the distance which, according to him, shall be problematic for him to commute. The application is dismissed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)