IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3533 OF 2010 Nasar Dilabar Khan & Ors. .... Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Respondents Mr. S. Venkateshwar, Advocate for Petitioner. Mrs. V.R. Bhosale, APP for State. Mr. Parvez Memon h/f Majeed Memon, Advocate for respondent no.2 Complalinant present. Coram : Smt. R.P.SondurBaldota, J. Date : 12th January, 2011 P.C. 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. 2. This petition is filed under Article 227 Constitution of India and under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of C.R. No.250 of 2010 against the petitioner pending before the Metropolitan Magistrate’s Court, Bandra, Mumbai. Both the advocates state that the parties have since settled the dispute and have arrived at the consent terms dated 29th July 2010. Both the advocates further state that the consent terms have been filed in the Sessions Court in the proceedings of anticipatory bail by the petitioners. In view of the settlement of the dispute, no purpose would be served by proceeding with the complaint filed. Hence, the petiton is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). (Smt. R.P.SondurBaldota, J)