IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10608 of 2007 VIVEK SHANKER PRASAD Versus SMT.ANUPAMA PRASAD ----------- 3 24.06.2008 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner is husband wants an early conclusion to the matrimonial case no. 66/03. The litigation it seems between the parties has been going on since the year 2000 and non-conclusion of the proceeding is taking it toll between the parties. Though, many things have been said in the petition by the petitioner for the reason of delay but the counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent rebuts the same. In fact, he points a finger at the petitioner for causing delay in the matter. The court is not inclined to go into nitty-gritty of the pleadings. The issue is that the case is pending at final adjudication for quite a while. This court has been assured by the petitioner that he shall fully cooperate in the matter. The present writ application is disposed of with a direction to the family court of Additional Principal Judge, Patna to conclude the case preferably within a period of 6 months from today. It is also recorded that in case the parties do not cooperate in the matter without any cogent reason and explanation the court may record the same and proceed in the matter so that the matter is not delayed any further. The writ application stands disposed of. Rajeev/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)