l-USHGOURTOPGHHATIt^^UBHiBILASBUR Appellants Claimanis Respondents '.<?' SingleBench: Hon'ble Shri DilipRaoaahebQeshmtdth,*!; MA(C)No.1007 ofZOO? 1. Suman Qfo Late ShffKeshawatre Sattu.agedaboutO&t^eais: : 2. Sheelu ®/o l-ato Shri "Ne9Wavi'an» Sahu, aged aboirt OS^eare: 3. Smt. Dewtamiari ^iie ^ t.atte Shri Keshavram iSahu, ^|e<< aboHt 2? yeare: TheappellanlNQ.1and2araMine»s, through^irin^^ ^aarelian^ Smt. Devl<umari Wife of 4-ate Stut Keshawam Sahu. 4. Udaybhan Singh Sa^u Son of ta*B -Shri Chaitoam Sahu, Jaged aboK^ y^rs: 5. Smt. Sohagabw Wife of Shri Udaybhan Sit^h Sahu, aged aboufe SSyears: AU are restdents of ^lll^e^ )..ldiwa> Police Statioa Aijum, Tatisil wid District Dhatntari ^.G^ Versus 1. Abdul Hanif Son o( Shrl Maftnwocfc Khaii, aged about^^^ 4^ f^ident^ftiCTn]|>arai(^lipur»y61icei Stetion 13uram B^ti, OisbTCtJSalpur (C.G^ 2. PreetamSingh QarohaSoffof^Urte Shri Jogender Sin^i Garcha, ^ed about 58 Veare, Man^ing RartneFi Civil Lines Raipur, lahsfl and District Raipur (CS.) 3. The Braneh MaR^eiFgttie Newlfldia Insurance Oon'tpaRy wMn'utel, Bajrang Markrt, RaipHF;Ta(is arKl Distnct Raipur (C.G.O Appeal underSeetion173ofMotoT\fthielesAet.1M8 Present: Shri P.P.Sahu, counsel for Shri H.P.Agrawal,Gounsetfor^es()on£tel')tNo.3fii:iauraa". ORAI. (Passiedon 28X8.200^ -i" Heard. 2. Aggrievedby theorder dated 07.04.2007 pa^ed^ AdditioTOil Motor Aecidents Glaims Tribuna), Dhanitari (hereinafter refewed to as the Tribunal') in daims ease No. 43®gQ6whereby jn an aeektental death case a sum of Rs.2,75,OOQ/- was awanted towards compensation, the appellaBts being the 2 mlnor c)tjltfren, wlfe and parents of deceased Keshavram Sahu have preferred thisappeat (er enhancement of compensation. 3. Learned counsel for the appeltonte submittodttat in thls appeal he is assailing the impugned orderonly on ttie groundthat amaunt awarded underconventional heads is tess and noSilng has been awarded towards loss pf love and affeetioh to the mi<»orchiMren. 4. During the course of arguments, a settlement was arrived at bebween ttie leamed counselfor the parties whereunder the leamed counsel for respondent No.3flnsurancecompanyaflreedto(Myasum of Rs.25,000/- to the elaimants oyer and above th®compansatlen already awarded by the Tribunal, wfthina periOd of40 days from tottay. 5. LearnedcounselforthepartiesprayedTordisposalofappealin terms ofthe setUement. 6. Accordirigly,the impugned awardpassed by the Tnbunalis modified. Compensation aiirarded t^ ttoe Tribunal is anharoed by Rs.25,000/-(Rupees twrenty five thousand only). fhe respondeirt No.S/insurer shalt depositthe entire femainfng compensaltonWifcin a period of 40 days, failing whicK, the respondent No.3flnsuFer shdl alse beliable to pay interest @8% perannum from the date of afqtlieaUwi fitl realization. Appeal stands disposed of accordingly. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge