HHJ‘H i‘7UIIRF (JF GHHIAT‘! méiiRi-i EXT Eii ASWUR gig: Hnn mn ~1nrl unlnannra wnenra é: Hr,h’hla Writ Penuon 13!, i”\io.é§:22 .i‘ZUIJ8 retmoners $hiv Kumar Pafei S/o Ud‘noram \_ Hatei agw ahnm 3b yea Orgi Giaae-li Ai Govi hmner Sehonuary Schoc Semarwa, Sioak Ghampa (CE) xman Hasad Yaaav ->Io ‘hn J mm VaQaV ag9” aDOH! I't\ a - mgr, mgtm” na ill u-, Seer-W1 Uiuun IJ Champa Varun Kumar $hukia $70 Shri Ganes‘n Was-ad $hukia, ageci aijoi'f, 35 yeag‘s. Gcwgea‘bn Shiks a Kai rii Grari'e-ii, Ai Govi‘. Htn‘ner 3erondarv :u’c’nooi, ->mud. Eéack “war“ M, Bi *‘Si Jangif Champa (6b.) 4. Vimal Kumar Shrivas S/o. $hri $‘niv Cz‘naran iai $hn‘vas‘ aed 339m 42 years, Cwcupa cm: Shiksha Karmi Gracie-ii. At Govi. ' ‘in'nN I§ercnriar School, At i v ria BL-“ Hawahr District Jamigi! Cnampa \ula.) a. Smt. Niiu 3harma W/o Shri Satisn Kumar Snarma, aged ahcut 33 yearg, Qcsupahw Shiksha Kar‘mi Gradé-ii, At Govi. Giris Higher §econdarv Schooi, a) Shiv Kumar Singh Kanwa! Sic. Bhagwat Pra$ad (anwar, aged abOU’i 4i) yé'ai's, UCCUp‘ailbrl Ski $ha Karmi Grade-H, At Gevt. Higma‘ Sacanciafy Schooi, Pahariya. Biock Baieda, District Jatijgir Champra (CE) hr mV - i B ‘ iadeIi 5"! aI ( ) g .L Qtttce cf Jile. Perishayet, Jahgir istrict Janjgir-Champa (CG) D Eésnmwrienta I istate 9f Cz‘nhatnsgam Through its :‘y Pamhayat 9W; Rum! Deveiopment Depaiimeni DKS BhawamRaipur(S. .) 2.. Tne Aqditionai Secretary $tate of Chhaitisgaz‘. Schaa! Edu tésn Depai‘tmeni, Ems Bhawan, ? Ra 13 -=_ir w ’F‘.GV). C. “i‘he Director Panchayat and Sogiai Sefvices, CG State Raipur 4. The Chief Executive Gfficer. Qffice 13f Jiia Pamchayat, Jangir Disi'rict Jahjgér-Ch-ampa (C.G.) Penuoners Writ Fetiiien ($1 NeA‘i-Diiiiijg 'i. $mt. Ren‘uka Fatie W/‘e DH Patie Agerj about 4Q years. Qrcupatiw : Shikehg Karmi Gracie-ii: Freserfiw posited a’i Govt. Higher Secendary SchoeL Seoni, Tahsi: & Dis€rict Jamgir— Champa ($3.6: z. Smt. Aruna lives Min Wio Laxmar: Pyesad Miyi, Aged abeut' 38 Gccupaiior: : Shiksha years, Karmi Grade-H, Presently pasted at 'Guv‘i‘. Highei' Seemiciai'y 3chool. HardiUarve) Tahsii & Dietg'iei Dietg'iei Jae§gir~Chamapa (CE) VS. Reseenrients ‘i. The State ef Chhettisgarh eugh The Secretary Panci’iaya'i and Rural Devebpment Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur {c.G.) The Additione! $ecrerary $ta’te of Qhhariiegarh Schee! Edeeetren Department DKS Sham/an, Reipur (C.G.). -'i’he Director Pane‘nayat and Seeiet Serviees, CG State Raipur (C.G.) The Chief Executive Officer‘ PetmonerQ Respondenfs Flehent (Writ Petition. under Amcie 226 cf 'rhe (j'onstltution of main; 5m! Rd;ebn KL ‘nerS. 3hr: Amk Bakshi. coun$ei far respondent No.4. the agave wn RNQ §\‘, p3 &anuram ‘Durve $10 Late Ram Durve aged about 3$ years 'é! 30w Schoai Distrist Janjgir-Champa fCG.) Smt. $un§ta $ihani vii/’0 Jaga‘ish Prawd Sham agcc abwt 35 years Sniksha Kai‘m3 Grade ii Govt. Higher 3econdary Schea! Sarisari Dis 'i‘ci Jami €i (C6) $tate‘ 0f Cz‘nhattisgarh ’i'hr-ugh Sacrei‘ary Pamha Devei’aprriéni Dap ym Bhawan, Raipur {1 ’3 ‘ a Edugatéiri‘: érii: Ei’la wan, Raipur (GAG, "ne Dirdctor Panchayat and $G5iai Sénices, QC: $Eaie R .~ The Chief Executive \Jfficer, Gfé‘ sf Jiia T Dmchayai, Jargw . . ohdlmd and Shn AShWmI Shakid} Euur‘ifaei {m fhe UUVL. 'k re, nuvvbntu II. ! ”as“ mm. Iul I. n. a V umw. vb :JV t petitions are being aisposerj 0f ey thSs common order as in a‘pi these. petitions, petitioners have chatdenged the notificatien daied 30‘“ Nevember, 200.7 iss under wnh éection '35 sueéection (‘1) of the Chhamsgam Panenayar Ra; A gru“( w;p. \ C Suiiie‘sh Bapi I Wm Peiitmn i5: No ’i ’i zgizi‘nil‘s’ area; H: resperrdeet g *1 in exercise of p~wer Semen iiU eubéeeiion {i}, (Section b5 SLre-eeenen (1) Part~E reae w ' * .zca— I I f cé run Adhmiyam 19513. whereby I. anisgam Panghayat Shlk$ha Karmi h Recruiiment and $ervic-e Conqitions Ruies. 200‘! have been framed and in §cneame 4 framed under Ewe b, for tne purpose o‘r pramonon rrom (:mksha Karm! Gmée i! to ShiKs‘ha Karmi Grade i, elighbniiv criteria of post graeuatren in reiated eubject, B.Erj..lD.Ed. ant: seven years teac‘nrng experience has been prescribed. Learnee’ counsei for the petitioners submit that the petitioners were appointed as $niksha Karmi Grade-ii when Shhattisgarh Panchayat Shiks‘na Karmi Recruitment and Condition $ervice Ruies. "IQE‘iY was in i‘orce. Eiigibiiiw criteria tor p.o.etion trem Sniksna Karmi Grade-ii to Grade-l tinder $cheduie 4 framed under Rule ‘5 i'i)ib~) and Ruie 8 of Rule 13:57 was oniv post graduate degree in ,re‘iated subject and 7‘ years experience. He further argued that the petitioners snouid be permitted to undertake ntdlilito course as departmentai candidates rn View ot the eiigib in; criteria tor promotion to tne poet ct $nii<sna Karmi Grade i under the ruie auu i, so that they may aieo get an opportunity to improve. their ciuaiit'icaticn to he eiigibie for nromotio. to the post oi isniksha .Karmi (Brade i. $hri isumesh daiaii iearned Govt. Advocate argued that the petitioners have no right to ciaim that rutes governing conditions of their service shouid be forever the same as the one when they entered service. Additionai qLiaiitication tor promotion to the post of $‘niksha harm! ‘i cannot he deoiared as ultra—virus on this Grade i under the ruies i gi'OLII‘iQ. m We have heard iearned counsei tor the parties. it is settied iaw that there is no right of any empiovee ot the ‘etate to ies dovernine. conditions ot his service should he rorever the U} oi irn tna 2 C ’ ‘ 4;/”1 ti“- same as the ene when he entered sewiée for aii the purpcses and exgept for ensuring or saieguaraing rights and beriefiis aireac‘y earned, acquired or accruerj at a particular paint of time, government sewént has no ”gm ta chanenge tim authority of the State t0 amend, alter and bring int-3 mme new ruies retaiing ta even an existing service. Therefore, in our considered opinion, tne impugned ruie canner be said to be uitra-virus to the Cionetiiution. If). Piease refer to the iucigmerits oi Supreme court in Pii Josi'ii v erreuntani Genera! renorteci in 1 {2W3} 2 $C€3 53¢ and ii)“ FiectrgigggBoarei‘ i; ”riv Eiectriciirg;o‘arci VTnezhiiar VAykkiga iSanqem reported in time} 3 Set.» we. 7. We creem it proper that the petitioners should be permitted to fiie appiteation for permiseion to appear in E.Ed./D.Ed._ course as departmentai candidates to the respondents. it such appiicatlone are . tiiee. the concerned authority s‘naii aiiow them to pursue B.Eci.iD.Ed. ‘course as departmentai canaio‘ates,. provided they tuifii! the necessary coner‘tions for the anove course as per the prescribed ruies and reguiatrons. d. With the atoresaid observation, the petitionstxaridisposed of. Sd/ sw- . Dhirendm Mishra RN. CHANDRAKARI Judge Judge bin. iv Ix