IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.102 of 2008 SIKANDAR RAM …. Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND 2. KIRAN DEVI ….. Opposite Parties. ----------- 3. 26.11.2008. N.H./ Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the order dated 7.6.2006 passed by Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna. It appears that the order of ad interim maintenance was passed as back as on 16.10.2006 but inspite of that not a single farthing has yet been paid and the matter is lingering since long. In the meantime, a petition was filed to recall the order, which was also rejected vide order dated 7.6.2007. Under the circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere in the impugned order of ad interim maintenance. Accordingly, this revision application is hereby dismissed. However, the court below is directed to dispose of the case within five months of receipt of this order. ( Ghanshyam Prasad )