1 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.354/2007 Shravan Kumar Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. Date of Order :: 23.10.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr Vineet Pandya, for the petitioner. ... This matter came up for orders on an application for early hearing on the count that the controversy involved has already been decided by this Court. On examining of record I find the statement given in the application to be correct, as such, the same is allowed. The petition for writ is heard on merits. The controversy involved in this petition for writ is no more res integra in view of the judgment of this Court in the case of Vijay Choudhary & Anr. Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. (SBCivil Writ Petition No.8650/2007). Accordingly, this petition for writ is also allowed. The respondents are directed to consider the petitioner for appointment on basis of his final selection in pursuance of the advertisement dated 18.8.2004 on the post of School Lecturer(English) against 77 vacancies reserved for SC/ST which could not be filled on account of non- 2 availability of suitable candidates by adopting general procedure. However, it is made clear that he will be entitled for seniority as per his placement in the order of merit and will get notional fixation of pay, but no pecuniary benefits for the intervening period. The order aforesaid is required to be complied with within a period of three months from today. No order as to cost. (GOVIND MATHUR), J. Jgoyal '