C407 No. 7 of 2011 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, Advocate for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, the Court finds that the applicant was residing with her husband at Okhimath. It is alleged that the husband had thrown out the applicant from his house which resulted in the filing of the various complaints including the application u/S 125 Cr.P.C. It is alleged that the applicant is now residing at Dehradun with her mother but the fact remains that her parental house is also at Okhimath which is not denied. The factum that the applicant is residing at Dehradun on a temporary basis or on a permanent basis is not supported by any cogent evidence. Consequently, the court is not inclined to allow the transfer application. The transfer application is rejected. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 22.06.2011 Shiv