IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.51050 of 2008 MINKU SINGH S/O-Gopal Singh, R/O-Vill-Amsari, P.S.-Murar, Distt.-Buxar. …………………………………………..Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ……………………………………..Opposite Party. WITH Cr.Misc. No.1507 of 2009 SANJAY KUMAR SINGH @ CHELA @ SANJAY SINGH S/O-Birendra Singh, R/O-Vill-Murar, P.S.-Murar, Distt.-Buxar. …………………………………………..Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ……………………………………..Opposite Party. ----------- 3/ 25.03.2009 Since both above these bail applications have arisen out of one occurrence i.e. Murar P.S. Case No. 24 of 2008, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. Wrong affidavit has been given on behalf of petitioner Sanjay Kumar Singh that he has got clean antecedent. But according to the case diary, it appears that the petitioners are involved in case from before. The case has been registered under Section 394 but later on Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code has been added. Both the petitioners have got criminal antecedent. Considering this, I am not inclined to grant bail to them. Accordingly, their prayer for bail is rejected. However, they may renew their prayer for bail after completing one year in custody. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)