IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14029 of 2003 MANJU KUMARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 5. 09.11.2009. Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. Counsel for the petitioner with reference to the following prayer of the petitioner made in the writ petition:- “(i) for issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 21.5.2003 passed by the respondent no. 4 contained in his Memo No. 132 dated 21.05.2003, whereby and whereunder the respondent no. 4 was pleaded to select the respondent no. 5 as a Sevika at the centre of Uprauna Aganwari without going through the terms and condition for appointment as Sevika. (ii) For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus, commanding and directing the respondent authorities to select the petitioner as a Sevika of Aganwari Centre Upraura because she is fulfilling all the terms and conditions of selection as a Sevika of an Aganwari Centre whereas respondent no. 5 does not fulfill any terms of selection as Sevika of an Aganwari Centre.” Would submit that there being alternative remedy available to the 2 petitioner she would like to avail the same. That being so, this writ application is permitted to be withdrawn with a liberty to avail the alternative remedy. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)