IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18149 of 2009 1. BHARAT SAO,son of Jagdish Sao 2. Nandan Kumar,son of Jagdish Sao 3. pawan Kumar,son of Jagdish Sao 4. Jagdish Sao,son of late Sarju Sao All resident of village-Pandui,P.S.- Parashbigha,District-Jehanabad. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 21-05-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that petitioners are brothers-in-law, Bhainsur and father-in-law, though they have been alleged for demand of dowry and causing cruelty but allegation regarding having bad eyes means to say that they were intending to have sexual relation with the complainant, in my view also, belies the allegation. Reason is quite apparent that if a lady of the family is choice of rest of the family members, then there could no occasion for demand by way of dowry, otherwise also differences appear in between the wife and husband, for which submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that divorce case was lodged earlier to this case. In the suggested and discussed facts and circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In case of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Complaint Case No.525/2008, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, subject to the 2 conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )