IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS THURSDAY, THE 1ST OCTOBER 2009 / 9TH ASWINA 1931 RP.No. 872 of 2009 ------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WA.2793/2007 Dated 26/03/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S)//APPELLANTS IN W.A: ---------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TAXES (A) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONERATE OF EXCISE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE ASSISTANT EXCISE COMMISSIONER, ERNAKULAM. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. NOBLE MATHEW. RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT IN W.A: ------------------------ MRS.OMANA ASOKAN, MANAGING PARTNER, THE LANDMARK (A UNIT OF HOTEL HILL TOP), NEAR JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, KALOOR, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ------------------------------------ R.P. No.872 of 2009 in W.A. No.2793 of 2007 ------------------------------------ Dated, this the 1st day of October, 2009 Order Balakrishnan Nair, J. The appellants have preferred this review petition on the ground that the submission of the respondent noticed in paragraph 4 of the judgment that her husband has been absolved of all liabilities is not correct. We notice that, we did not act upon that submission. It is specifically mentioned that, if the said claim is correct, she is entitled to get certain benefits. Since our directions are conditional on the correctness of the said submission, it is unnecessary to entertain this review petition on the above ground. Accordingly, the Review Petition is dismissed. Sd/- K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. Sd/- M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JUDGE. DK.