Co.Pet. 9/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Mr. D Baruah, learned counsel appearing for the applicant points out the inadver tent omission in the Court’s order dated 17.11.2011 in as much as, the prayer un der Clause (ff) was not specifically granted in Paragraph 10 of the Court’s or der while all other prayers were allowed by the Court. Considering the typographical error, this application is allowed and the prayer made under Clause (ff) of the Petition is also granted in the Copmany Petition N o.9/2011. Accordingly the order dated 17.11.2011 in Company Petition No.9/2011 s tands corrected. The Misc. Case stands allowed with the above rectification of the Court’s order dated 17.11.2011.