1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WP No. 798 of 2000 Urdu Upper v. The EO and anr -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr C.S. Kaptan, Adv for petitioner Mr Gopal Mishra, Adv for respdt no.1 Coram: B. P. Dharmadhikari & A. P. Bhangale, JJ Dated: 20th August 2011 1. Mr C.S. Kaptan, Advocate appears for petitioner; Mr Gopal Mishra, Advocate appears for respondent no.1. None appears for respondent no. 2. 2. Respondent no. 2 has filed a pursis stating that he was relieved by petitioner and joined the other school on 1.9.2005. He has stated in pursis that because of his joining other school, order declaring him as surplus and absorbing him in petitioner’s school has come to an end. Therefore, challenge in the present writ petition is rendered infructuous. Pursis also discloses that he filed Writ Petition No. 1197 of 2000 challenging his declaration as surplus and he has decided not to prosecute that petition and also sought permission to withdraw it. 3. In view of the pursis, it appears that grievance of the petitioner in the present matter is already redressed. Present 2 writ petition is disposed of as infructuous in the light of Pursis (St) No. 13037 of 2010. Rule discharged. No order as to costs. 4. Office to list Writ Petition No. 1197 of 2000 on 24th August 2011 before appropriate Bench. Judge Judge joshi