IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 19TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 28TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 24442 of 2011(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. HASEENA.V.T., D/O.ABDUL NASIR.V.T., HASEENA GRADEN, VILAKKATHODI HOUSE, KAKKOOTH, PERINTHALMANNA. 2. DEEPAK.P., S/O.PATMANABAHAN.V.A., `SREYAS', THEKKUMURI P.O.-679 506, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 3. NAVANEETH KRISHNAN, S/O.UNNIKRISHNAN (LATE), KOMALAVILLA, CHERUKARA P.O.-679 340, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. ANJANA SASIKUMAR, D/O.SASIKUMAR, CHENGOT HOUSE, CHETTIPADI P.O.-676 319, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 5. BINDIMA.K., D/O.VASUDEVAN, `SREEDHARAAM', KADALUNDI P.O.-673 302, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 6. INDUJA R.NAIR, D/O.RAJENDRAN NAIR.N.K. `AISWARYA', VADAVANNUR P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 504. 7. MITHUN.M., S/O.MOHANAN, CHAKKINGAL HOUSE, KOTTEKKAD P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 732. 8. RESHMA.R.G., D/O.V.RAJAGOPALAN, `SREELAKAM' THAMBAD P.O., THALASSERY (VIA), PIN-670 694. 9. SUJITH.M.B., S/O.BHASKARAN, MALAYIL KALAM, ANAMANGAD P.O.-679 357, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 10. PRIYANKA.M.NAIR, D/O.MURALEEDHARAN.A.K., `ASWATHI', PALAKAZHI, KARIKIDAKAMKUNNU P.O.-678605 PALAKKAD DISTRICT. WP(C).No. 24442 of 2011 -2- 11. FAYISAH YOOSUF, D/O.YOOSUF.P.U., PERUMBILAYIL HOUSE, KONATHKUNNU P.O.-680 123. 12. MAJIDA.K., D/O.MOHAMMED KUTTY, KAPPUR HOUSE, ALIPARAMBA P.O., PIN-679 357. 13. MUHAMMED ASLAM.K., S/O.KUNHYDRU, KARUKKOLI HOUSE, THRIKKALLOOR P.O., CHIRAKKAL PADI, PIN-678 593. 14. YADUKRISHNAN.A., S/O.SURENDRAN.A., ARAYULLATHIL HOUSE, CHOMBALA P.O., VADAKARA, PIN-673 308. 15. ABDU RAHEEM.K., S/O.HAMZA KIZHAKKETHIL, KIZHAKKETHIL HOUSE, AMMINIKKAD P.O.-679 322, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.U.K.DEVIDAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., PIN-673 635, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., PIN-673 635, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. SC SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 24442 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION FILED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 19/8/2011. EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION FILED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 19/8/2011. EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION FILED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER DATED 20/8/2011. EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION FILED BY THE 4TH PETITIONER DATED 22/8/2011. EXHIBIT P5: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION FILED BY THE 5TH PETITIONER DATED 22/8/2011. EXHIBIT P6: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION FILED BY THE 6TH PETITIONER DATED 22/8/2011. EXHIBIT P7: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION FILED BY THE 7TH PETITIONER DATED 20/8/2011. EXHIBIT P8: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION FILED BY THE 8TH PETITIONER DATED 20/8/2011. EXHIBIT P9: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION FILED BY THE 9TH PETITIONER DATED 20/8/2011. EXHIBIT P10: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION FILED BY THE 10TH PETITIONER DATED 20/8/2011. EXHIBIT P11: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION FILED BY THE 11TH PETITIONER DATED 25/8/2011. EXHIBIT P12: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION FILED BY THE 12TH PETITIONER DATED 22/8/2011. EXHIBIT P13: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION FILED BY THE 13TH PETITIONER DATED 22/8/2011. EXHIBIT P14: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION FILED BY THE 14TH PETITIONER DATED 3/9/2011. EXHIBIT P15: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION FILED BY THE 15TH PETITIONER DATED 25/8/2011. /TRUE COPY/ P.A TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).24442/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 19th day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners applied for revaluation of the paper 'Microelectronic Technology' of the 8th semester B.Tech Degree Examination vide Exts.P1 to P15 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within six weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4.Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs