IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Writ Petition No. 77 of 2009 Date of decision : 25.02.2009 Shoukeen ....Petitioner V/s State of Haryana and others ....Respondents. BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. DAG Haryana. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) Pursuant to order dated 19.01.2009, passed by this Court, a report of warrant officer has been received, relevant part whereof reads as under:- “Sh. Teka Ram owner of the Brick kiln denied the allegations and further told me that the petitioner and his men, of their own, had come to work at his Brick kiln and none has been illegally detained by him and in case the petitioner and his men do not want to work there, they are free to go anywhere they like. Thereafter, the petitioner alongwith his men left the premises in Canter No. HR-46-B-1010 and before leaving the place, the petitioner, Shoukeen also gave his statement in this regard which is annexed as Annexure 'A'. Learned counsel for the State has also referred to reply filed on behalf of S.I. Anand Parkash, SHO, Police Station Dhand, district Kaithal wherein it is stated that alleged detenues are not in illegal detention. Crl. Writ Petition No. 77 of 2009 -2- In view of the above, this petition has become infructuous and the same is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 25.02.2009 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE