CS No.53 of 2005. 29.04.2009 Present: Mr.Ramakant Sharma, Advocate, for the plaintiff. M/s.K.D. Sood and Sanjeev Sood, Advocates, for defendants No.1 and 3. OMP No. 417 of 2005. Infructuous, in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties separately placed on the record of the case. OMP No.620 of 2005. Infructuous, in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties separately placed on the record of the case. OMP(M) No.26 of 2006. Infructuous, in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties accepting by both Shri C.K. Baljee and Ms.Manju N.Shah as legal representatives of deceased Shri C.Baljee. OMP No.227 of 2007. Infructuous, in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties separately placed on the record of the case. OMP No.158 of 2009. This application has been filed jointly by both the plaintiffs and the defendants in this suit under the provisons of Order 23 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying that the suit be decreed in terms of the compromise as arrived at between them and as appended with the application and exhibited as Ex.C-1 which has been signed by plaintiff No.1, Smt.Renu Baljee for and on her behalf and on behalf of her daughters, namely, Mrs.Sumita Lamba and Mrs.Namita Gandhi. The defendant Shri C.K. Baljee has signed this compromise on his behalf and on behalf of Mrs.Manju N.Shah, defendant No.2. The powers of attorney of Mrs.Sunita Lamba, Mrs.Namita Gandhi and Mrs.Manju N.Shah, have also been placed on the CS No.53 of 2005. (2) record of the case authorizing Mrs.Renu Baljee and Shri C.K. Baljee to represent them in the suit. Statements of Mrs.Renu Baljee and Shri Hari Krishan Sharma, the attorney of the plaintiff, have been recorded separately. Let a decree in terms of Ex.C-1 be passed. Parties have undertaken to be bound by the decree so passed. This application is disposed of. CS No.53 of 2005. This suit has been compromised between the parties in terms of Ex.C-1. A decree in terms of the compromise Ex.C-1 be passed. Parties have undertaken to be bound by the decree so passed. Court fee be refunded to the plaintiff in accordance with law. This suit is disposed of. All interim orders are vacated. April 29, 2009 (Dev Darshan Sud) (aks) Judge.