1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.1748 OF SUMMARY SUIT NO.1748 OF SUMMARY SUIT NO.1748 OF 2004 B.I.Publication P.Ltd .. Plaintiff versus A.D.Kansara & anr ..Defendants Ms.Nitya Mehta for Plaintiff. Mr.Ajay Gadkari for Defendants. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 9th February, 2005. DATED : 9th February, 2005. DATED : 9th February, 2005. P.C:- P.C:- P.C:- 1. Learned counsel for the parties hand in the consent signed by them. Consent terms are also signed by Mr. M.M.Koshi for the plaintiff. The plaintiff has filed on record the affidavit of Mr.M.M.Koshi attaching thereto a resolution of the board of directors of the plaintiff authorising him to sign. The consent terms are signed by the defendant no.2 in person for self and as proprietor of defendant no.1. The plaintiff and the defendant no.2 isidentified by 2 their respective counsel. The consent terms are taken on record and marked X. There shall be an order in terms of the consent terms except clause 8. 2. Issue court fee refund certificate as per rules. D.G.KARNIK, J