IN THE HIGE COURT 033‘ JUDICAEL‘URE AT BILA§$PUR$ G.G. mm: PETITION him-”£80? 2002 r , 227; WRIT 'PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226% CONSTITUTION 'OF INDIA V — Pet itioner Raohna Naiau D/o 3hri%’ir.J.E.Na1du, aged about 26 yeara; , $ecturer,Eigher Secdhdary School, Belgahna, District Bilaspur, R/o. Church Roa&‘,Gan6.hi Nagar, Opposite ta Nehru Nagar,3$ilaapur(c’G.) Vs. Responaents ‘: ”17) State Of c.G., Thrbugh Hyper Secretary, School Eduéation Department, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan,Raipur Brine ipal, . , (Boys) Higher Seocndary SchoaliBelgehna , ‘iatrict Bilaspuz» (men) ’ . m"0<§¢ .’. ,3) ,Distaict Education efficer, ‘ Bilaspur, (C.G.) Particulara cf the petitioner : As above in the cause title. Part iculars of the 2espondents : A$ abéve in the cause title: § “ / 6 ; X9 Nair: Advocates foir the petitione 1 ‘ \ ‘ \Shr1 AkmlAgrawal, Panel Lax Jefor te ae. Shn VI K Bhadun and Shn , . ~ Counsel for the petmoner sub 'ts‘that the pefiti'oner Wastrargferred d bu the" the year 2002 and the transfer trder has not been caneelle not been reheved He ’ubrmth that the matter 1s covered by i §etrt1oner has r r Havme thus consrdered the fa ts an errcumstces of the case an ansfer order has not bee cancehed then the petrtroner be relved wrthrn a eriod of three week from the date of productron of certrfrec eoy o r WP VO 758/2002 and I N A o R r: yf h Stt ‘ Apelicatiyonfolri’urgeiit’ hearing s loweci >_ i, Heard ; ’3 The matter reiates 10 transfer t I i 11‘1 the orders passed mW P \o 1832/2 04 dated 29-7-20 The fact 15 hot drsputed by the tate counse d an d natenal on record it rs drrected th t 1f te tr r’ p s p fthrs oder The petrtrorr rs aoeordrngly dr in Viewf ‘ef ahot/e order \xl 5820/”004 also stand drsnosed of Cer p l rtfred eoy as per rues eal- Fakhruddi Judge ¢ ‘ K l al. i 1 é r 64 l x n 1 tr h sedof s V n