1 CP-379-08.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 379 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2309 OF 2008 Shri Chintaman Raghunath Gharat .. Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents None for the petitioner. Mr.A.I.I.Patel, AGP, for the respondent No.1. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 2nd August, 2011. P.C. 1. None for the petitioner. 2. In Writ Petition No.2309 of 2008, by order dated 3.4.2008, respondent No.2 i.e. the State Minister for Town Planning Department, Maharashtra State was required to decide the revision application filed by the petitioner against his disqualification within 8 weeks from the date of communication of that order. It appears that the decision was not taken within that period and, therefore, the Contempt Petition was filed. Now, Mr. Manu Kumar Srivastava, Secretary to the Government, Urban Development Department has 2 CP-379-08.sxw filed an affidavit to the effect that though not within 8 weeks. The hearing was completed on 23.1.2009 and the matter was decided on 21.3.2009 and the revision application was dismissed. The petitioner was aware about it. Not only that, he had challenged the order passed by the Hon'ble Chief Minister in Writ Petition No.4665/2009. That Writ Petition was also dismissed by this Court on 18.6.2009. 3. In view of the above circumstances, as the order passed by this Court was complied, though after some delay, in view of the reasons given in the affidavit of Mr. Manu Srivastava, I find no valid reason to take action for contempt of the Court. Therefore, the Contempt Petition stands dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)