:1: :1: :1: IN IN IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL ORIGINAL ORIGINAL SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 55 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO. 55 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO. 55 OF 2007 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.1869 OF 1995 PETITION NO.1869 OF 1995 PETITION NO.1869 OF 1995 The Podar Mills Ltd and anr. ...Petitioners vs. Union of India and Ors. ...Respondents -------- Mr.Firoz Pooniwala i/by.Mr.I.P.D’cruz for the petitioners. Mr.D.A.Dubey for respondent no.1. Ms.N.G.Menon for respondent nos.2-5. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.N.PATEL, J. J.N.PATEL, J. J.N.PATEL, J. And S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. J. J. DATE DATE DATE ; 15TH FEBRUARY, 2007. ; 15TH FEBRUARY, 2007. ; 15TH FEBRUARY, 2007. P.C :- 1. This court is not satisfied with the reasons given in the Affidavit-in-support of the Notice of :2: :2: :2: Motion for restoring the petition. In view of the nature of litigation, we are inclined to restore the petition on the condition that the Petitioner will pay cost of Rs.5,000/-. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, submits that, the cost may be credited to the Account of High Court Legal Aid Committee. Cost to be deposited within a period of one week which shall be a condition precedent. On failure of the Petitioner to deposit the cost, the order restoring the petition would stand recalled without any further reference to the court. . Petition to be listed in due course. (J.N.PATEL, J) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)