CWP No.7562 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.7562 of 2010 Date of decision:28.04.2010 Sangeeta & others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr.N.S.Panwar, Advocate for the petitioners. 1. To be referred to the reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M.KUMAR, J. The petitioners have approached this Court seeking a declaration that the land acquired by their father i.e. respondent No.3, namely, Rambir is the ancestral property and being the coparceners, they have the right to share the amount of compensation. Nature of the prayer made by the petitioners shows that these are the questions of fact which are required to be determined by the Court of competent jurisdiction. In the writ jurisdiction, such type of questions cannot be determined which require adducing of evidence, tendering of documents besides other proof. Therefore, while dismissing the instant petition, we relegate the petitioners to seek the remedy of filing of a civil suit. Any application with regard to stay of grant of compensation CWP No.7562 of 2010 2 to respondent No.3 may also be made before the Court of competent jurisdiction. Dismissed in the aforesaid terms. (M.M.KUMAR) JUDGE 26.04.2010 (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) mk JUDGE