IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.935 of 2007 CHANDESHWARI PRASAD SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 7. 15.7.2008. Writ petitioner-appellant, aggrieved by the order dated 12.9.2007 passed by a learned Single Judge in C.W.J.C.No.15989 of 2005 dismissing the writ application, has preferred this appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent. When the matter is taken up, Mr. B.B. Singh, appearing on behalf of the appellant, makes grievance of less payment of provident fund amount. In the light of the orders dated 9.5.2008 and 16.5.2008, respondents have produced the details of the provident fund account of the appellant and withdrawal made by him. JC to AAG III states that from the aforesaid, it is evident that the appellant had made over drawal. This has been 2 contested by Mr. Singh. Having heard learned counsel for the party, we are of the opinion that this question cannot appropriately be decided in the present proceeding. Appellant, if so advised, may approach the District Provident Officer in this regard. Needless to state that in case appellant approaches the District Provident Fund Officer and furnishes details, same shall be considered by him in accordance with law. Appeal stands disposed of accordingly. C.K.Prasad) (Dr.Ravi Ranjan) ahk 3