IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22859 of 2008 KRISHNA CHANDRA SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR - - - - 4. 18.7.2008 Heard. The prayer for bail of the petitioner was dismissed by the learned Judge on the ground that the petitioner did not allow the police to lay its hand on him, did not allow it to execute the process issued against him and to appear in court only when one accused was acquitted in a shaded trial arising out of the same facts. The conduct of the Additional Public Prosecutor and the Presiding Officer is also reprehensible inasmuch as the informant was examined as P.W. 1 and he did not support the prosecution but neither the Additional Public Prosecutor nor the court looked to that aspect of the matter that he turned hostile to his own version contained in the F.I.R. The Additional Public Prosecutor might have the reason for not doing it on the pressure of the accused or a politician, but what reasons the Judge could have for not discharging his own business. The Judge appears simply a mute spectator to the proceeding. 2 The petition is dismissed. Let the matter be placed before the Hon’ble Inspecting Judge of Munger for considering the conduct of the Judge. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)