IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.5672/2011 alongwith CWP No.5708/2011 Decided on:19.10.2011 _____________________________________________ 1. CWP No. 5672/2011 Neeraj Jaswal. …Petitioner. Versus H.P. Public Service Commission and another. …. Respondents. 2. CWP No.5708/2011. Sadique Muhammad and another. …Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. and another. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. B.S. Chauhan, Advocate in CWP No. 5672/2011. Mr. M.A. Khan, Advocate in CWP No. 5708/2011. For the Respondents: Mr. Ankush Sood, Addl. A.G. for respondent-State. Mr. D.K. Khanna, Advocate for respondent-H.P. Public Service Commission in both the petitions. _____________________________________________________ Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Since common questions of law and facts are involved in both the petitions, the same are taken up 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 together and are being disposed of by a common judgment. 2. In sequel to order dated 22.9.2011, Mr. Ankush Sood, learned Additional Advocate General has produced on record copy of letter dated 19.10.2011, whereby it has been mentioned that 40 posts were available for general category candidates and all these posts have been filled up through H.P. Public Service Commission. 3. Consequently, both the writ petitions are disposed of with a liberty reserved to the petitioners that in case any vacancy becomes available in future, they can approach this Court for the redressal of their grievances, if so advised. No costs. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. 19.10.2011 *awasthi*