IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 828 of 1989 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE N.G.NANDI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO @ MULJIBHAI PUNJABHAI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 828 of 1989 MR PH PATHAK for Petitioner No. 1-3 Mr.L.R.Pujari, Asst.GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent No. 1 MR JR NANAVATI for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE N.G.NANDI Date of decision: 13/07/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT In this writ petition, the petitioners have been praying for relief of regularisation of their services with respondent No.2-Nagarpalika. It is stated by Mr.J.R.Nanavaty, learned counsel for respondent No.2-Porbandar Nagarpalika that the services of the petitioners have been regularised during the pendency of this petition and none of the reliefs claimed in the petition survives. Mr.P.H.Pathak, learned advocate for the petitioners submits that in view of the statement made by the learned counsel for resondent No.2 this petition has become infructuous and be disposed of accordingly. 2. The petition is dismissed as infructuous. Rule is discharged. Interim relief granted earlier stands vacated. No order as to costs. 13.7.2001 (N.G.NANDI,J) mty