sfSKwmsS'Sfm 'v Ii ;K •^i' ^^?^2S«^ IN THE M.P. STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIE ORIGINALAPPLICATIONNO. (^ API^EfCANT : MAHESH RAMGANDHARVA (Ex. Asstt. T^scher previousiy appoj'nted on adhoc basis) S/OSHRf.i'DULAf AGEABOUT 38YEARS, R/0-VILLAGE-BHARNI, BLOCK& TAH. - TAKHATPUR, DISTT. - BILASPUH (M.P.) VERSUS NON-ARPLICANT/ fiESPONDENTS f~ (1) STATE OF M.f. THROUGH COLLECTOR, BILASPUR, DISrT.SILASPUR (M.P.) (2) COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIQNS.GOyERNMENTOFM.P., DIFtECrORATE OF EDUGATION (DPI OFFICE)NEARCHETAKBRIDGE, BHOPAL CM.P.) . (3) DEPUr^DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, \ EDUCATION DISTT. BILASPUFt EDN. DEPm , P.O,BILASPUFiM.P. APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 19 OFTHE ADMINSITRATIVETRIBUNAL ACT. 1985 ^(N0.13 OF 1985)READWITH ARTICLES 14 & 160FTHECONSTITUTION OF INDIA PARTICULARS OF APPLICANT ...,;1;'.-' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B. : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNfflOTM, J. WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.2388 OF 2005 Petitioner Mahesh Ram Gandharva versus Respondents State ofM-P. and others Present : Mr. A.N.Bhakta, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State. ORDER (Passed on 7<h ofSeptember, 2Q06) It is submitted fhat the facts and quesrion of law involved in the present petition are same to that of ih Malih-imi Sidar caid others vs. State offAadhya Pradesh and others (Original Application No.624/1997). The Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tiibunal, Jabalpur, by its judgment and order dated 22-3-1997, allowed the application ofthe petitioners therein. Leanied couiisel for the petitioner seeks pennission ofthis Court to approach tiie respondents/State for consideration and disposal ofthe petitioner's ^ w Wi: i: t' S's hl^ case in tenns ofthe order dated 22-3-1997 passed in the case of Malih'am Sidar and others (Supra) by Madliya Pradesh AdministrativeTribunal, Jabalpur. 2. Learned counsel appearing for fhe respondents/State f^' fairly agrees with the submissions made by leamed counsel for the petitoner. 3. Accprdingly, the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation before the respondents — State Aulhorities for their decision on the representation in the Ught ofthe order dated 22-3- 1997 passed in the case of Malikram Sidar and offiers (Supra), in accordance with law, on its own merit, within reasonable time. T\ 4. With the above-stated liberty, this petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Certified copy as per rules. .Sd/-