IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (C) NO. 45/2010 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 104/2008 (SK. SABIR SK. BUDHAN - Vs. - JAMA MASJID TRUST AND OTHERS) ................................................................................................................................................... ...... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................... ...... Mr. S.R.Deshpande, counsel for applicant Mr. R.L.Khapre, counsel for non-applicants. ... CORAM : R. K.DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 15th NOVEMBER, 2010. This is an application for direction to the non-applicants to grant lease to the applicant on the terms and conditions mentioned in the application without prejudice to his rights. 2] By the judgment and order dated 21st July, 2010, delivered by this Court in C.R.A.No. 104/2008, this Court issued certain directions, which are reproduced below. “Civil Revision Application dismissed. However, if the plaintiff offers an amount of Rs.40,000/- for cultivating the land for one year on mutually agreed terms and conditions between the parties effective to 2010-2011, the authorities of the defendants 1 to 3 to act upon it. Such compliance by the plaintiff should necessarily be within 30 days from today. If the plaintiff does not adhere to it, it will be presumed that cultivation will be in continuation of trust – defendants 1 to 3. No costs”. 3] The period stipulated above by this Court expired on 20th August, 2010. This application was made on 27.7.2010 for direction to the non- applicants to give lease to the applicant on the modified terms. 4] The conditions were already imposed by this Court while passing the order, which is reproduced above. The applicant has failed to comply with it. There is no reason to alter the said terms and conditions, as it would amount to review of the order passed on 21st July, 2010. 5] In view of this, there is no substance in this application. The same is, therefore, rejected. JUDGE Rvjalit