^^ -. fc,;,[ ':;•.••- .... f ^ c- .^ •10<rC^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION fCl N0. "?^Z^ / 2011 PETITIONER ...::^^ ^•:--""^w) RESPONDENTS ^^rr"^^^ ^'A^^i^ y!"/i.:-:'A ;^:?';;-J/. Ss ^ ii ^yr^^^ ^'.^' /" : Ramavtar Singhania, S/o. Shri Gopi Ram Singhania, Aged about 51 years, R/o Lailunga, District, Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS /-1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) ^ 2.NagarPanchayat, Lailunga, District - Raigarh, (C.G.) 3. Collector, Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSrTUTION OF INDIA .^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WRTT PETmON CQ No. 7328 of2011 Ramavtar Singhania. RESPONDENTS VERSU8 State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmmON OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Sattsh K. Affirihotri, J. Present: Shri Sourabh Dangi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No. land3. Shri Amn Sao, Advocate for the respondent No. 2. ORDER (Passed on 07th day ofDecember, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the impugned notice dated 25.11.2011 (Annexure P/l), for demolition of the alleged unauthorized constmction raised by the petitioner, has been withdravm by the respondent authorities. Thus, nothing survives for adjudication aadthis petition has become infiuctuous. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for otiier side do not controvert fhe above submission. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infiructuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit