C482 No.690 of 2008 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, Advocate for the applicants and Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the petitioner no.1 is brother-in-law (Jeth), petitioner no.2 is sister-in- law (Jethani), petitioner no.3 is unmarried sister-in-law (Nanad), petitioner no.4 is father-in-law and petitioner no.5 is mother-in-law of the sister of respondent no.2. He further submitted that the petitioner nos.1 and 2 are living separately, respondent no.3 is an unmarried girl who is a student of B.Ed and petitioner nos. 4 and 5 are old persons who are ailing with several diseases. Further, there are no specific allegations against the present applicants and the specific allegations are against husband who is not an applicant in this petition. Learned counsel for the applicants further submitted that he does not want to press the present applicant u/s 482 Cr.P.C. but prayed that the trial may be directed to take into consideration above facts stated by him while disposing the bail application of the applicants. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the applicants and in the interest of justice, the application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as not pressed. However, if the applicants are arrested or surrendered before the court concerned, their bail application shall be heard and disposed of without unreasonable delay and all the facts stated above shall be taken into consideration while deciding the same. Interim order dated 10.12.2008 stands vacated. (D.V.,J.) 28.9.2010 RG