IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21535 of 2010 RAJIV KUMAR YADAV @ BADRI YADAV S/O UMESH YADAV @ BIHARI YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 30.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 392/120 B of the Indian Penal Code and 25 (1- B), 26 of the Arms Act. It has been submitted that even though the petitioner was arrested right after the occurrence, but no incriminating article was recovered from his possession, and only two live cartridges were recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Now the petitioner's father undertakes responsibility of the petitioners conduct after his release from jail custody. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in connection with Bakhtiarpur, P.S. case no. 298/2009, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the father of the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the 3 trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. It has been submitted that the petitioner is accused in only one other case besides the present one which fact will be verified by the Magistrate before releasing the petitioner on bail Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)