IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13251 of 2010 RAMDHANI YADAV, SON OF SHARDA YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SOHASA PHULWARIA, P.O. MEGHWAL MATHIA, P.S. RAMNAGAR, DISTRICT WEST CHAMPARAN. Versus 1. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 2. INSPECTOR GENERAL CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECRETARY FORCE, EASTERN SECTOR HEAD QUARTER, PATNA. 3. DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL C.I.S.F. UNIT BATCH KOILANAGAR, DHANBAD. 4. SENIOR COMMANDANT, C.I.S.F. UNIT FARAKKA, WEST BENGAL. 5. COMMANDANT, CENTRAL INSDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE, KLSTPP KAHALGAON AMRAPALI GROUND-II N.T.P.C. KAHALGAON DEEPTINAGAR BHAGALPUR, BIHAR, 813214. ----------- 02. 25.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the Union of India. 2. Petitioner was applicant for the post of Constable(GD) in the CISF. He participated in the physical/written test, became successful and was asked to appear in the medical examination. In the medical examination also he became successful and was waiting for service of appointment letter, instead received communication dated 23.7.2010, Annexure-3 from the Senior Commandant, CISF Unit, FSTPP, Farakka, West Bengal rejecting his candidature on the ground that petitioner submitted false/incorrect information in questionnaire form during recruitment. 3. This writ application has been filed asserting that petitioner did not submit any incorrect information while submitting the questionnaire form for being considered for the recruitment. He desires that false/incorrect information said to have been incorporated - 2 - by him in the questionnaire form be disclosed to him. 4. Let petitioner represent before the Senior Commandant, CISF Unit, FSTPP, Farakka, West Bengal along with a copy of this order and the Senior Commandant should disclose the incorrect information furnished by the petitioner in the questionnaire form by passing speaking order as early as possible in any case within one month from the date of receipt of the representation of the petitioner by him. Before parting with this order this Court would like to observe that had the Senior Commandant taken care to mention the incorrect information submitted by the petitioner on the basis of which he rejected the candidature of the petitioner under letter dated 23.7.2010, petitioner would have been saved of the ordeal of approaching this Court for the present purpose. 5. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)