IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8165 of 2010 RAM SAGAR MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 24.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Ashok Kr. Sinha, learned counsel for the complainant. There is clear allegation of commitment of rape upon the victim lady which is doubted on the ground that there was land dispute in between the parties mainly for a sahjan tree. For justifying her false claim, this case is lodged. When the matter was investigated by the Police after filing of the F.I.R., allegation was found not believable. So, final form was submitted exonerating petitioner from the allegation. However, on protest only cognizance is taken may never justify refusal of the anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. C1/40 of 2007, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of J.M., Ist Class, Pupri at Sitamarhi subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)