IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Civil Writ Petition No. 100 of 2006 (S/B) Jayendra Singh and others ............ Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others .......... Respondents None for the petitioners. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Ashish Joshi, Advocate for respondent No. 3 Mr. Lalit Sharma, Brief Holder for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Per:- HON’BLE J.C.S. RAWAT, J. (Oral) None for the petitioners. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Ashish Joshi, Advocate for respondent No. 3. Mr. Lalit Sharma, Brief Holder for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. 2. List has been taken twice. As there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, we are left with no other option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. The petition, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. Stay order dated 21.03.2006 stands vacated. (Dharam Veer, J) (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 04.12.2007 LSR