BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Eighth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE S. RAJESWARAN CRL OP(MD) No.17333 of 2011 1. V.KALEESWARI, 2. M.VANAM, 3. P.RAJA, ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1, 2 & 3 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHINNAMANUR POLICE STATION, THENI DT.(CR.NO.602/2011) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.KUMARAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.C.RAMESH, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are arrayed as accused Nos.1, 2 and 3 and they prayed for grant of anticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C., for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 452 and 506(ii) I.P.C. in Crime No.602 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal side) would submit in his argument that no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I could see that no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of four weeks. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 28/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, UTHAMAPALAYAM. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHINNAMANUR POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. S.KUMARAN Advocate SR.No.46122 SR : 28.12.2011 : 2P/6C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.17333 of 2011 Date :28/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/