IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 29TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 7TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 25969 of 2011(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- PROF.SATHEESAN, AGED 62 YEARS, S/O. THATTIL KANDUNNY, “CHITHIRA HOUSE”, THALIKULAM VILLAGE, DESOM, CHAVAKKAD THALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, PATTOM P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695004 REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY. 2. CHIEF ENVIORNMENTAL ENGINEER, THE KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, PATTOM.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695004 3. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, THE KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, THRISSUR, SUN TOWER, EAST FORT .P.O, THRISSUR 680001 4. M/S.FLORA TILES, PUTHANTHODU, THALIKULAM P.O, THRISSUR 680659 REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR KOCHUMOHAMMED, S/O.KHADER, MANILEKKATH HOUSE, THALIKULAM VILLAGE, DESOM, CHAVAKKAD THALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. SC FOR PCB MR. M.K.C.DAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 25969 of 2011(U) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF CONSENT TO OPERATE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. P2: TRUE COPY OF THE CIRUCLAR NO.PCB/TAC/18/2004 DT.9.8.2004 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. P3: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER BEARING NO.PCB/TSR/IC/1615/09 DT.25.6.2011 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBIBITS : NIL //True copy// PA to Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------- W.P(C) No. 25969 of 2011 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 29th day of September , 2011. JUDGMENT The petitioner is aggrieved by Exhibit P1, consent order granted by the 3rd respondent in favour of the 4th respondent. It is challenging the consent order ,the writ petition is filed. In my view if the petitioner has any grievance against Exhibit P1, the remedy available to the petitioner is to file an appeal before the appellate authority, he being an aggrieved person. Therefore the writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedies in accordance with law. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE rkc //True copy// PA to Judge