( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 251 OF 2008 Vishnukant s/o Wamanrao Jamkar PETITIONER VERSUS Mohd. Naijiroddin s/o Imamoddin & another RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. M.M. Patil (Beedkar), advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.V. Patil, advocate for the respondent No.1. ..... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 11th September, 2009] PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. This petition is being disposed of on concession of the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. By consent, the impugned judgement rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in criminal revision application No. 56/2004, directing remand of the matter to the Executive Magistrate and restoration of file No. 81/MAG/145/Cr.P.C.-03 dated 4-11-2004, is quashed. ( 2 ) 4. The parties to maintain status quo regarding the disputed land. 5. The parties are at liberty to agitate their rights of ownership or possessory title, whatsoever it may be, in the civil Court by filing appropriate suit. The petition is disposed of accordingly. [ V.R. KINGAONKAR ] JUDGE NPJ/criwp251-08