1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3748 OF 2009 Vishwanathrao Patil Murgud Sahakari Bank Ltd., Murgud, Dist. Kolhapur. ... Petitioner. V/s. Pandurang Ganapati Chougule. ... Respondent. Mr. Amit B. Borkar for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 15TH JUNE, 2009. P.C. :- The impugned order is interlocutory. There is no need to interfere at this stage. If the final order in the Appeal is adverse, then, while challenging it, the Petitioner can raise appropriate pleas with regard to rejection of their application (Exhibit 24). 2. Needless to state that during the course of the arguments, the Petitioner can always rely upon the Judgment 2 of this Court in an Appeal that was preferred by the Borrower/ Appellant before the Lower Court and which Appeal has been dismissed by this Court. All contentions of both sides in that behalf are kept open. 3. Petition dismissed subject to above. No costs. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.