V / DATED THIS TH 5th Y OF JUNE,1998 BEFOiE 14E hONBEE MRJU3I1CE CHDRASHEKRIiH BETWEEN: I. Shr.M. S,Papclnna Age: Major 1 0cc: Bi.isiness R/o 66/1 1 7th Cross, 8th Main,Rajnaha1 Vjias £xtension Banga1ore 80, .., Petitioner, 2. shri,.4, M.a1iappa A: r4ajor,OcC ;Busifless 1 RJo 66/Il 7th Crags 1 r 6th in RjmhaI jIag Extension 1 I3angdIore—8O .. Petitioner. KBy Sri.Anant Mndgi 1 Adv.for Petitioners AND: i,The ConRissjoner, corporation of the City of Barqalore, NRoacj, Banga1ore2, 2The AsstExecutive Engineer, Corporation of the City Banglore, Shivajinagar, Bangalore-. 1. .Respondents. (By Sri Ashok Harnahalii for Aespondent s) ‘rit petition5&a filed under Articles 225 and 227 of the Con itution of India, with an affidit, praying to direct tho respondents not to deiolii or disnantie the petition prenie without following the due process of la.w and after providing an oppo rtunity to the titioners of being heard in the matter. nd etc., 3— ‘grit petitiorz’A Corning on for i24g this day the Court iade tne following: The çetitioner h4s challenged the provisional order passed y the Corporation U’s32l(l) dnd (2) of the Karrrtaka Corpo rations (for short the ct) apprehending that the Corporation rnay take steps to - derrolish the building belonging the petitioner. Under the he of the t, t Corporation has rio aithority to derolish the building without pasng a final order ô conteTipited U/s.321 (3) of the ct In the said VCw Oi. the ud er, tae is no reason for tt titioner prehena — 4, any deiiolition without Dassing a final order as contenpiated U/s. 321 (3) of the 4 With these observations, these Writ petitions are disposed of. SS. r.by: C.oy: