1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7180 OF 2005 Jimit A. Shah ..Petitioner. Vs. The University of Mumbai & anr. ..Respondents. .... Mr.Mihir Desai for the Petitioner. Mr.R.A.Rodrigues for Respondent No.1. Mr.K.K.Jadhav for Respondent No.2. .... CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & F.I.REBELLO & F.I.REBELLO & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ. JJ. JJ. 27th October, 2005. P.C. : 1. Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. By a letter dated 24th May, 2005, the Vice-Chancellor had requested the college to allow the Petitioner to appear provisionally for the T.E. (Semester VI) (Information Technology) Examination to be conducted by the college on behalf of the 2 university. It appears that the representation is still pending and in the meantime, the Petitioner has approached this Court. 3. After the matter was heard for some time, counsel appearing for the University, on instructions, makes a statement that the Vice-Chancellor will take a decision within seven days from today on the representation. Statement accepted. If the decision by the Vice-Chancellor is in favour of the Petitioner, the college is directed to declare the results of Semester VI within two days of such communication. As a consequence of and in the event of the Vice-chancellor condoning the delay, the college to accept the fees of Semester VII and regularize the Petitioner’s admission. Rule made absolute accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. 4. All parties to act on an authenticated copy of this order issued by the office of this Court. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) (DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)