HIGHCOURTWCHHAmsaAIilH.BILASPim Wcfe PeUUBn (81 Bto. 4827 of2007 PBTITIONBR RB»EOaDEMT8 Shri P.L.ClMBidi-atoE, s/o Shri Arjiuilal CtimulTakar, aged daout 60 yeai's, woriking as A^istsffit Ei^mcer/Sub-DrwsiBaNd Officer, Posted at Bhatapara Ceawi. Coastructioa SuIt-Dwiaiau-1 at Aassag, District- RaipwrtChIiattisgarh) VersHS 1. State of ehltattiagarh, Tfaroi^h- The Secsetaiy, Water RcsQiaces Department, DKS Bhawau, Maxrfial^a, RaipUr (GIiIiatttsgarN 2. Engixteer-in-Chief, Departnaent Of Watee Resources, Raipur Chhatti^arh. 3. Excoutive EByaccr MRP Ptiase-2 Woite Diwsioa Raipur, CtihattisgMfa 4. Mr. V.K. Tamrakaa-Asstetant Enguieer, O/o Chief Engtacer, Mafaanadi Paryojana, Raipw (Chliattisgarh) AMieatMace: . Shri Sanjay K. ^rawal, counael for fhe petttioncr. Shri Ajay Dwwcdi, Panel Lanvyer for the State on advaaee copy. ORALORDBR (os.os.aooTi 8UmL KUMARSIHHA. J. Heard fmalty with thc conaent ofbofh the parties. The pctitioncr, who is worldxtg as a Sub-DivMonal Officer at Aarang, district-Raipur(CQ), taas chaflenged the vaBdily of teaasfer order dated 6th Jufy, 2007(Anaexure P-2), whereby, he hi tieea traasferred firem Aaiang to fhe ofBce of Chief Engmcer, ^Mianadi Project, Raipur. S!'- < W. P. (81 Mo. 4827 of 2007 Referriag to-fhe plcadii^s, inade oa adBdavit, learacd couasel for petitioner aigues fhat fhe petttioner is to retire on 29& Pfebruary, 2008 on accoiuit of conipletion. crf his scmces aad he would be facing m.uch hardship, ifhe is teai^ferred finoiuAarang to Raipur, just about 8 inonfhs prior to the date of his superaiuiuatioa. He alsp icfeis to clause 7 of tlie tratisfer poU.cy dated 13th Junc, 2007,accoi'ding to whlch, fhe cases of fhe persons, who are at the verge ofiBtiremait, are to be considered under fhe said clause. His subaiission is tttftt the aforesaid order is in. violatioa ofthe transfer poHcy ofthe govemiaent. After hearing fhe aiguinents advanced by leactted counsd for fhe respective partics aad ater going thiough fhe contents of tSas petittoa as wett as fhe dociunents anncxed with thc pctition and the contents of the traasfer poM.cy vide cjtause 7, in fhe opinioa of tbis Court, the eads ofjustice would be served if the petitiQner te directed to ffle a repitesentation before the coaceraed aufhorily, iavolifag the provisioas ofclause 7 and ofher clauscs, which aie awaflable t& fhe pctitioner ficamcd ia the transfer policy dated l3t11 June, 2007. Accordingly, fhc petffion is disposed (rfwitfa. a djrection that if so advised, the petittoner inay ffle a detailcd repBesentattoa before fhe concemed aufhority wifhia a period of three weeks fiioaEtjtoday aloi^ with tlie copy of this order and a cxfpy of writ pctition, raising his grievauce, and if such a represeatation is filed, the coruieraed authority shaU disposc of thc same as early as possibte preferAly withia a period pf two monfhs &om. the date of receqit of the said representetkin. It is furtttcr directed fhat ia fhe aaeaawhile, fhe petittoner shaU not bc relicved fimm. his prescnt place of posting (Aarau^ and shaU be allowed to contiaue fhere. |~—— The petition stauds disopised of. Sd/- 1 Judge .'y.-- ;-''•..: