IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.Revision No. 1370 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision: 8.12.2009 Krishan Kumar Mishra. ....... Petitioner through Shri B.R.Vohra, Advocate. Versus Krishan Bihari Mishra and others. ....... Respondent nos. 1 to 6 through Shri H.S.Gill, Senior Advocate with Shri R.K.Dhiman, Advocate. Respondent no.7 through Shri Hemant Bassi, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? .... Mahesh Grover,J. This revision petition is directed against judgment dated 7.3.2007 passed by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Chandigarh (hereinafter described as `the trial Court') vide which respondent nos.1 to 6 have been acquitted of the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 448, 452, 323 of the Indian Penal Code,1860. Respondent nos. 1 to 6 were sent up to face trial in a case registered vide F.I.R.No.319 dated 27.9.2005 by the Station House Officer, Crl.Revision No. 1370 of 2007 (O&M) -2- .... Police Station, Mani Majra. After appraisal of the evidence brought before it, the trial Court came to the conclusion that respondent nos. 1 to 6 were not identified to be the assailants. The complainant, who was examined as PW1 and his wife, who appeared as PW2, could not either name respondent nos. 1 to 6 or identify them leading to their acquittal of the charges framed against them. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to show any material from the record on the basis of which the findings of the trial Court could be termed to be perverse or termed to be erroneous. Thus, having regard to the facts of the case in their totality, the present revision petition has no merit and is dismissed. All pending miscellaneous applications are also dismissed in view of the above. December 8,2009 ( Mahesh Grover ) “SCM” Judge