Slngle IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) T.P. ( Criminalt No. ^f of2010 T iench ^^^ (NA lALy^VA <C(3r2)! PETITIONER/ : Nripendra Mandal, aged about 55 Father of ComDlainant years, S/o Late Atul Mandal, caste Namoshudra, occupation Business, '\}w-"'^'^o!sy ^^^--^^-..-., ----.^-.-.-.. —-.-...—, -^•^"•^S^"" R/o vi"a9e Kandri, P.S. Chando, w s^?-^0 Tahsil Samri ( Kusmi), Distt. Sarguja %^ (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS/ PROSECUTOR 1: State of Chhattisgarh, through P.S. Chando, Tahsil Samri, Police District Balrampur, Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) 2. Murtaza Ansari, S/o Madhumiyan. 3. Noortaz S/o Manuwar Ansari Both R/o Village Indri, P.S. Chando, Tahsil Samri ( Kusmi ) Distt. Sarguja 4. Nazir Khan S/o Vashir Khan 5. Ayub Ansari S/o Mohd. Uddin Khan Both R/o Village Kandri, P.S. Chando, Tahsil Samri ( Kusmi ) Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) 6. Mubarak Ansari S/o Rehman Ansari, R/o Village Tehri, Bargarh, P.S. Bargarh, Distt. Gadwa ( Jharkhand ) APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 407 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE »-; Bsa » i.ti £ .'.^•^^K^S sB.'jasMa HIGHCOURt QyCHHATTISOASH ATSltASPUR SB : HON'BLB MR. JUSTICE PRITmKER DIWAKER T.P.SCR.ISO. 4/2010 Nripendra Mandal; ' : •:-. KOtr-APPHC&8fit yersus .{.:.,- Stafeol'C.G. 8!,0thers Shri D.N.Prajapafi:, catinsel fbr the: applk;ant.', : .S' ^ ' Shri.R.Tripathi, P:'L.;fer'the~St;ate/resp.,NQ,L .•^< -..^ ;; ,. ' '.., APPUGAriON UNDER SBCTION 407 OF THBiCTLP.C. ORSSSi . : ;:-, ^'y- ':. • ;(26.02.20ilQ) Heardon admission. :;'.' ' . : | ^ ' :... • .-.'-^ The insfantpetitiori filed unclerSeGtion,407 of:the GR5 !:-•'. is for transfer of S.T. No. .280/2008 pending.'before (he Aaditioaal •; : Sessionsjudge, Ramanujganj to any court of DistrictS.urguJa;' , It has been argued by the counsel for the applieant-that ' ths petitioner is the father of the complainant' and cjne • : ^ unariimous letter <(Aniiexure A/3) llas ' been received \by:f?tjhe,. ^;';' petitioneT^in wHich ,it •&asibeen:lteB>t:ioned^that the evi.denc^I^J^Mgi;! given in the Court :;affier ::66riSidering all the -'factgSg.iEnii^;,^'?: cireutnstancesofthecasft;'::.'1 : ' ! '. ' , :^a?;^!.:''33»'Ss|» Shri Prajapiati.submttsthaf in view of thla,.;:let|er-tSe"i:";:l"S"3 petitioner has an, apprehension'that there may not be {Sr,ti)ial;:' ^' |. ~..,-^'^'-Sef#:.iy" •"'"1. •and he also, submits that fhe life of the iamily in^nbeTS.^of'lhe^ | petitionec; is in danger and fKerefore. also th&;<a^ may te .,; ^ transferred. ' • '; '' '"; ~ • , -;..'. ::': i',-::-':' 11.' -•. .On theother hand counsel-fbr.'the'State submitg.;tyat;ihe •^v '^ounds raised by the petitidner has no substance and on s^.ich,i^ ^^ clymsy 'giound the pefition Gannol /be transferred.' He lurtiJier -^^ submits that the apprehension shpwn by the petitioner is| ill founded and even it is not clear as to who Had issued tte:sffite^ed •Itl S-liV .l'!!: 1:^:.11. ati^ letter. I have heard couih.set.iortlieparties. . .. ';-%: •: ., Gonsideiing' tKe?totalify:.;6f theifacts, I.'find no :i'ea:scA^ tQ;' interfere;:;in tKe;;; sameK" e^,@etition faas :no : substance anjdj is;^ lli;'!.8S accordirigty.disHii^edj;: ':-ss^ ^••"' •' Sd/- Pridnker Dliwaker Judge