CWP No.813 of 2004. 20.6. 2006. Present: Mr.D.S.Parmar, vice counsel for the petitioner. Mr.Rakesh Jaswal, counsel for respondent No.1. Ms.Shilpa Sood, Central Govt. Counsel for R-2. The petitioner has filed this petition for grant of the various reliefs. The main reliefs sought for by the petitioner are as follows: “(a) Quash the provisions of regulations as contained in heading Requirement for Good Standing Para-1.18 (i) and Veterinary council of India Regulations, 1993 Para-8 Evaluation/examination 8(i); (b) Direct the respondents to combine marks of theory and practical for the purposes of aggregate as well as pass percentage. (c ) Direct the respondents to provide the similar relaxation to the petitioner as provided to the students of B.Sc.(Agriculture) as per Annexure P/5. (d) Direct the respondents to allow supplementary/compartmental examination at least 4 papers i.e. 1/3rd of the total papers of the session.” The main grouse of the petitioner is that whereas in other courses being conducted in the University such as B.Sc. (Agriculture) relaxation was provided and the students were permitted to take supplementary of the compartmental examinations in the Department of Veterinary Science this has not been done. It has now been brought to the notice of this Court that petitioner in fact had appeared in the regular course for his 3rd professional examination and cleared the same. Thereafter, he had also cleared the 4th professional examination. Now retrospectively he cannot be given opportunity to appear in the supplementary examination. The points raised in the writ petition do not call for any decision and this Court will not enter into a hypothetical and academic dispute. The petition has become infructuous and is disposed of as such. June 20, 2006. (Deepak Gupta), PV Judge