IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 3917 of 2008 Decided on: 13.08.2010 Anil Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner. : Mr. Lokender Pal Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 and 2. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : In view of the reply filed by the respondents and the intervening development, no relief can be granted at this stage. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge August 13, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?