WP(C) 3876/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Mr. BD Konwar, Advocate assisted by SU Ahmed, Advocate for the petititoner and Mr. D Chakraborty, learned Central Government Counsel. Having regard to the pleaded facts and the reliefs prayed for, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage. Shortly put the petitioner’s version is that he had participated in a process in itiated by the respondents for appointment to the post of Constable (GD) in CRPF (hereinafter for short referred to a the Force). On the completion of the exer cise by order dated 27.08.2008 of the Addl. DISG, GC, CRPF, he was offered appoi ntment to the aforementioned post subject to, inter alia, medical fitness to be assessed on the basis of fresh medical examination to which he would have to sub ject himself. According to the petitioner, following such medical examination, he was informed verbally that he was unfit as vein in the left leg is visible . The petitioner, thereafter, got himself medically examined by a medical specia list of the concerned discipline at the Gauhati Medical College Hospital, who ce rtified him to be medically fit for duty. The certificate was issued by the con cerned doctor being aware of the petitioner’s rejection by the authorities of th e Force on the aforementioned ground. Armed with the said certificate, the peti tioner submitted an appeal before the concerned authority of the Force. By the impugned communication he has been informed that his appeal was not entertainabl e in absence of payment of reexamination fee of Rs. 25 in the form of IPO. Bein g aggrieved, the petitioner has approached this Court for redress. The learned counsel for the petitioner without prejudice to his pleaded stand su bmits that he is willing to furnish the reexamination fee of Rs. 25 by way of IP O as desired in this regard. He has placed reliance on a decision of this Court rendered on 28.11.2008 in WP(C) No.3213/2008, carrying the same grievance. The reby, this Court had directed the respondents to accept the payer of the petitio ner therein for review medical examination on payment of Rs. 25/- by IPO. Mr. Chakraborty has no objection to the course of disposal of the petition as su ggested. In that view of the matter and upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties as well as the documents annexed to this petition, this petition is, therefore, closed leaving the petitioner at liberty to deposit the medical reexamination fe e of Rs. 25/- by IPO within a week herefrom with the concerned respondent author ities. If the same is done, the respondent authorities would accept the deposit and ensure that medical reexamination of the petitioner is conducted within 2 ( two) weeks therefrom.