^'° c? JS*S o itioner Santram Simariya, S/o. : about'.,47,. years,- ; R/©. Sarpanch - Gram Panchaya' :Sfate oi'Ghhattisgaiti^thi'pugh.Secretary,, Pahchayat & Rural Development Departm$nt, Mantraiaya, Raipur (CG). The Director (Pahchaya^ Chhattisgarh Distt. Rait ditionai Coiiector, Prescrii i,^' ,k3). 5. Chis p SB: SHuwan:^Lat;Daharawai.;S/o.-SadaRaro £x-Sarpanch,: - Gram !„ Ri'Q. Viiiage Sohagpur, Tahsii Saja, Distt. Durg (CG). underArticie 226/227 of Ccanstitutionof India) le nflr. ir. Shrawan Agrawal, cocnsel forthe petitioner. !r. Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for.the State:. (Passed on. fh's 22 :. dayof0ctober,:2008) counse! appearing for th®petitioner submits that the oetitioner does not want 'to contest this petltiori bn: msrits at this staae. However, it js prayed that the Fespondent'No.?:;—Additioriai {^oiiector, •'i-.-' •-..: i wherein.the appeai ,is pendins consider and decide fee case jn'accordaneewifh iaw,.on^jts'cwriraen^ as SxpeditiGus!yaslpossible. ,. :::'..:.. ;?'^':,. ' :1'^1 %.[• l -2. ^'^ 'i^ iis^' ,? i-"!i:! ^'- t ^u 2) Mr. Shashank Thakur, fearned Periai Lawyer appearihg for the respondents No, 1 to4/Stats has no objection. 3): •• Sn view^of the fact that the appeai is-pending'.consideration before the Add'rtionai Goilsctor sii consider and decide ths appea!,,in accordance with law, on'its ovvn merits,,as eariyas possibte. ^ \ 4) in :view of the: :above, the petition stands: disDQSea of. '^t^ s^'p?6 ^- •'c Bk^-^&.iW^ ^3Kifi ^^^^"•s^^ \!^Ss^SSS