IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13436 of 2009 PRAMOD KUMAR SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 30.6.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Pre-arrest bail was allowed to the petitioner on 9.5.2008 considering the material collected by the I.O. till then. According to learned counsel, after the order no material could be collected by the I.O. to involve the petitioner. While allowing bail to the petitioner, a provision was made to reconsider his bail by the lower court on material collected in the case and if there is no material at all which is being conceded by the learned APP then there should be no apprehension on behalf of the petitioner that his bail should not be continued. However, he is allowed to remain and continue on the same bail in Kadamkuan P.S. case no. 746 of 2003 so granted to him by order dated 9.5.2008 but at the stage of framing of charge, the trial court shall justify the submission made on behalf of - 2 - learned counsel that no material could be collected after passing the original order dated 9.5.2008. With the aforesaid observation, this application for anticipatory bail stands disposed of. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI