Crl. Misc. No. M-30135 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : Crl. Misc. No. M-30135 of 2011 Date of Decision : October 21, 2011 Baldev Kaur .... Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. B. S. Dhaliwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG, Punjab. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Baldev Kaur accused has filed the instant petition for anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 298 dated 13.09.2011, under Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, registered at Police Station City Barnala, District Sangrur. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file. According to the prosecution version, on receipt of secret information that the petitioner was using her house in Barnala for immoral Crl. Misc. No. M-30135 of 2011 2 activities on receipt of huge amount, her house was raided and two boys and two girls were recovered from there. Counsel for the petitioner vehemently contended that the petitioner herself was not present at the spot when the raid was conducted. It was also contended that the petitioner is aged 65 years. Learned State counsel, on instructions from HC Jagsir Singh, contended that age of petitioner is 55 years. It was also contended that the petitioner was using her house for immoral activities, and therefore, she does not deserve the concession of anticipatory bail. I have carefully considered the rival contentions. Counsel for the petitioner admitted that the house in question belongs to the petitioner. From the said house, two boys and two girls were recovered on raid. Consequently, the petitioner does not deserve the concession of anticipatory bail. Dismissed, without meaning to express any opinion on the merits of the case. October 21, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE