IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13490 of 2009 MANGARU YADAV Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 27.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the only evidence against the petitioner is the confession made by the co-accused which can never be based for refusal of petitioner’s anticipatory bail. It is a case of highway robbery in which miscreants were chased by villagers, who caught one of them with pistol and looted money, who confessed before them leading to recovery and followed by identification of this petitioner. So, I find it is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)