•»*-; ^, 5-^- [^i ^,:^S:MSSs£C^^^ ,., i'r&se.ii.euuj is.isiiu"^"'"—————— p '^';_... .; s»i«.»»i' h..»M.^a^^» ^-;( j!l»ai"' .--r^^~""^-P"(7t°6tT" ~'^-T5. 1 I /^'^ IN 3HE KEOH OOURT OW tTODIG^TORE AT BILASPUR (CG) WKEI SBTITION N0. 4;7^<'> 051 2004 1. 2.' 3.- a'SBBSW 3BelK«»&sIiyap ,aged about 43 -seacs, S/o fenbaiya Prasa3 'Kastrysp, at present worieing as a iteS»u'ty mnger, SOres-fc Bepartment, sorest; EEi.vision, Bastar Circle a-fe Jagdalpur* BLs-fcrie-fc Bastar (CG). M.'M. U'pa<3hyay»' aged about 53 ysai-s, s/o B.S.UEedhyay, afc present t<orking as a BQpu-ly Hanager, rorest Dspar-tment,' sores-t javislon, Bastar circle at jagdalpur y Edstaic-t Bastar (GG). S.K.Nag, aged abou-b 48 years, S/o ghri chandan Nag, at presisifc vrcirKing as a isputy ESnager, sorest S?partroent,< •Eores'b Bivision, Bastar circle at Jagdalpar»;! Dl.stE'ic-fc Bas-fcar (CQ). -^ f*""^. "V ,:>!rf' -.^ --^\ N~ Y' '..\.1 ^- PE''eF'rFIONBRS A'r •ii 'S 1.' ^- 3.' AV Bie Sta-fce of Chhattisgarh,'through the ©cretary Bgpartment of SOrest,' Man-tralay»' D.K.S.Building,1 reipur (CG). Chief Gonservator of lorss-t,' State of ciihattisgash,' I&ipur (CG). GDnser'/atar of tores't»'Bas'fcar Efi.vision, testar cArele at Jagdalpur," Dis'ta-ic't astar (eo5. Divisioaal scires-fe Officer, ffistaf Division at iTagdalpur ,! Bi.stri.c-fc eastar (CG). /^-si^ y-i-/^-, _^S&vi Bivisional Stirest 0fficer,Btjapur sorest Divigion. I! Bi-japur Distriet Eantewada (CG). 6, Divisional Sbrest Officer, sorest Di-vislon Sutona, Bistcict Eantewada (CG). RS!Sa3NDENTS: WHIT "ES'EErI3:ON OirofiB::-S:RTIOEES 226/22% ©•PTSG 03NSTlTU'EIOig' ©21SBIS TSVSK VSSSSSeS 0?'1BPP^^IACT_WBS-05L<SRS2SSE£ 7WKTSDS-P3S/^M3SS_ TD_EX^V^SS^ y HK3H COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASKJR W.P.NO. 4540 of 2004 Petitioners D. K. Kashyap & aSheis Versus Respondents The State of Chhafl^arh and othere SB: Hon'ble Mr. JusUce Satish K.-Agnihotri, J Shri Vishnu Kostha, Advocate for the peCfioner. Miss Deepali Pandsy, Panel Lawyer for the respondents. Thakur ORDER (Passfld on Uiis 2^h day of February, 2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing for flie petitioner, on instrucbon, seeks for permission of this Court to withdraw this peUtion, having become infructuous. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection. 3. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge i^fe