1 cri-pil-3-10 pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 3 OF 2010 Ashokkumar Maruti Shinde .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents Mr. Amit Gharte i/by Mr. V.P. Patil for petitioner. Mr. A.A. Kumbhakoni with Mr. P.A. Pol, PP for State. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U. D. SALVI, JJ. JANUARY 28, 2011. P.C. By our order dated 1/9/2010, a three member committee was constituted by us so as to go through the repair works as well as the bills and submit a report. The Committee has submitted its report. Mr. V.P. Patil, who appeared for the petitioner, was one of the members of the Committee and in the report he has also pointed out specific areas where corrective measures were required to be taken. During the last hearing, when Mr. 2 cri-pil-3-10 Patil was present before us, it was generally agreed that his suggestions to number the staircases and other related steps would be taken by the P.W.D. This compliance has been done. We are also informed that the repair/maintenance jobs are undertaken in the High Court building only after specific requisitions are received from the competent officer. In our opinion, the petition has served its purpose to do away with the deficiencies pointed out in the existing system and no further orders are required to be passed. Hence, the petition is disposed off. (U.D. SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)