IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 3107 of 2011. Decided on: 9th May, 2011. Prem Lata ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and ors. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. for respondents No. 1 to 4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved on account of termination from her work as Mid-day Meal Worker (relieved) for want of vacancy. According to the petitioner, even if on account of strength of the children, one worker is to be reduced, it is the junior, who has to go and not the petitioner. The petitioner has also certain grievances with regard to the eligibility of the fifth respondent. All these aspects, the petitioner may point out before the third respondent within a period of ten days from today, in which case, the third respondent will look into the matter, after affording an opportunity for hearing to the petitioner, respondents No. 4, 5 and any other affected party, and take appropriate action in accordance with law and justice in the matter within another three weeks. 2. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 9th May, 2011 ( Justice Sanjay Karol ), (pankaj/rana) Judge.