IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AT HYDERABAD PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR C.R.P. NO. 5407 OF 2007 Dated 7th December, 2010 Between : I.William Banjamin Petitioner And Mary Shyamala and others Respondents ORDER: Petitioner filed the suit under Sec. 6 of the Specific Relief Act. The suit was valued and the court fee was paid under Sec. 28 of the A.P. Court Fee and Suits Valuation Act. The court below, however, has not numbered the suit and raised an objection that the plaintiff must value the suit as a suit for declaration of title. That order is questioned in this Revision. The respondents though served, nobody appears. I am unable to appreciate the reasoning of the court below inasmuch as when the suit itself is filed by the plaintiff under Sec. 6 of the Specific Relief Act and he has specifically stated so in the plaint itself, there is no reason for the court below to treat it as a normal suit for declaration. Valuation of the suit under Sec. 28 of the A.P. Court Fee and Suits Valuation Act is, therefore, clearly justified. The impugned order is accordingly set aside and the court below shall number the suit if it is otherwise in order and proceed further with the suit in accordance with law. The Civil Revision petition is accordingly allowed. No costs. _______________________ Justice Vilas V. Afzulpurkar December 7, 2010 MAS