WP(C) 2746/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE I.A. ANSARI Heard Mr. B. Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. B. J. Ghosh, lea rned Government Advocate, Assam, appearing on the behalf of the State respondent s. The case of the petitioner is, in brief, thus: Petitioner’s father, while workin g as a Lat Mandal in the office of the Circle Officer, Chenga Revenue Circle, Ch enga, Barpeta, died-in-harness, on 14.06.2009, and the petitioner accordingly ap plied for appointment on compassionate ground under the relevant Scheme. The pet itioner’s grievance is that the petitioner’s case has not been considered in ter ms of the relevant scheme and as per the law contained in that behalf. Broad guidelines for consideration of cases under the scheme for appointment of persons on compassionate ground were issued by this Court in Achyut Ranjan Das & others -vs- State of Assam, reported in 2006 (4) GLT 674. In the backdrop of the law as indicated above, it is, now, required to be determ ined by the respondents, particularly, respondent No. 2, namely, Deputy Commissi oner, Barpeta, as to whether the petitioner’s case has been considered by the Di strict Level Committee or not and if the same has not been considered, then, the petitioner’s case shall be placed for consideration, along with similarly situa ted persons, if any, before the District Level Committee and for such further ac tion(s), as are warranted by law. With the above end in view, it is hereby, in the interest of justice, directed t hat the respondents, particularly, respondent No. 2, namely, Deputy Commissioner , Barpeta, shall examine the petitioner’s case and do the needful in accordance with the observations made above. The result of the examination by the responden t No. 2, as directed hereinbefore, shall be communicated, in writing, to the pet itioner and the petitioner shall remain at liberty to take recourse to such prov isions of law, as may be permissible, if he feels aggrieved by the result of the examination of the petitioner’s case by the respondent No. 2. With the above observations and directions, this writ petition shall stand dispo sed of. No order as to costs.