-"•. a •: IN THEHON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C.No. ^-T^ of 2011 (Arising out ofMisc. Appeal Np. 1204 of 2000) APPUCANT APPELLANT tn.-ti'syS0"'1'"^ ' .-....••^•" ^^^W^--:-^T '^••--••;^^^' United India Insurance Co. Limited, Bilaspur, Through Its Divisional Manager, United India Insuraiice Company Limited, Divisional Office, 1454, Rajkiran Bhawan, Wright Town, Jabalpur (M.P.) VERSUS RESPONDENT N0. 1 :1 CLAIMANT RESPONDENTNO. 2 2. Non-Applicant No. 1 RESPONDENT N0.3 3. Non-ApplicanaTo._2 RESPONDENT N0, 4 4. l"11 Smt. Rain Bai, Wd/o Late Rara Sharan Sahu, aged about 55 years, R/o Village Semra, Thana- Ratanpur, Tahsil- Kota, Distt.- Bilaspur (M.P.) (Now C.G.). Khamhan Lal, S/o Kanta Prasad Shriwas, aged about 30 years, Driver of tiruck no. MP 26- D/2138R/0 ViUage Bansula, Thana: Jejepur, Distt.-Bilaspur (M.P.) (Now C.G.). Presently residing at Adhiri Kachhar, Pathariya, Opi- Rampur, Poli.ee station- Korba, Distt.-Bilaspur (M.P.) (Now C.G.). Rajeshwar Rai, S/d Bageshwar, Owner of truck no. MP 26- D/2138, R/o MI:G-75, Dr. R.P. Nagar, Korba, Distt.-Korba (M.P.). (NowC.G.). Shri Rameshwar Lal Sahu, S/o Late Shri Ramcharan Sahu, agriculturist, R/o Village Semra, Thana- Ratanpur, Tahsil and Distt. Bilaspur (M.P.) (Now C.G.). APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF Misc. Appeal No. 1204 of 2000 Tsr •=!Tf£!']"-3,^-OTS, fsrrTrrey t^^Lf. 6 ^-S "^200 s^v •vw; (r^-y^('. SII^ST T! f^ws wa sffliinBiiw Tsnwaf^snSRi ^to Uon'ble ShrLPrashantKumar Mishra^J. • 16,12.2011 iRNcrol'i 'Eiro-if ^ fe'at '(fsRZR ~Si'3T9(ns^i Shri J.K. Gupta, counsei for tl Heard on I.A. No.1 for condo ie applicant. lation of deiay in filing the restoration application. For the reasons assigned in ^pplication, this court is satisfied that the applicant has been able to expj application. I.A. No.1 for condonation of dl ;ain frie delay in filing the restoration Heard on restoration applicat|on. Leamed counsel submits thtet on 10/08/2010 three weeks time was aliowed for payment of fresh P| the correct address was not knowrj moved within three weeks, but thei and therefore the Misc. Appeal was On due consideration, defaultj Order of dismissal in non-corrt F on correct address, however since M.A. No. 1204/2000 is restor4d to its oriainat number. 'lay is allowed. the application for publication was said application could not be listed ;lismissed. iscondoned. ipliance is recailed, prasbantKumar Judge Mishra H".]sBa'i°(l''!ii!!»iRiT,ir5[.rti?iisr—FS,"4d—2/2011—1,50*000. {