IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4348 OF 1998 with SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICAITON NO. 5832 OF 1998 For Approval & Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE --------------------------------------------------------- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether their lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950, or any order made thereunder ? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? --------------------------------------------------------- RADHESHYAM GANPATRAM AGRAVAL & ORS. VERSUS SHRI UC RANE, DDO & ORS. --------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: (In SCA 4348/98) MR RM CHHAYA for petitioners MR AD MITHANI for respondents (In SCA 5832/98) None present for petitioners MR AD MITHANI for respondents --------------------------------------------------------- Coram: MR.JUSTICE S.K. Keshote,J Date of decision: 1/08/2000 C.A.V. JUDGMENT #. Mr.R.M.Chhaya, learned counsel for petitioners in one case submits that both these matters are covered by decisions of this court in special civil application No.7048/97 decided on 5.4.2000 (Coram: P.K.Sarkar, J.) and in special civil application No.7358/97 decided on 21.6.2000 (Coram: S.K.Keshote, J.). #. The learned counsel for the respondents is not disputing this contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners. #. Accordingly, these special civil applications are disposed of in the terms that in the shopping complex or the shopping complex to be constructed by the Panchayat in future, the cases of the petitioners may be considered for allotment of shops. Since the petitioners will be rendered out of their business which they are doing since last many years, the matter may be considered and finally decided within a period of two months from the date of receipt of writ of this order. With these directions, these petitions are disposed of. Rules in both these matters stands accordingly disposed of with no order as to costs. ....... (sunil)