IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37444 of 2010 BINOD KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 08.10.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner, Binod Kumar is in custody since 09.08.2010 in connection with Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 271 of 2010 under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. According to the F.I.R., while the informant and his wife after withdrawing Rs.2 Lakhs were going towards registry office, two persons came on motorcycle and snatched the bag containing the money and the mobile and fled away. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the theft mobile was found in possession of one Makhan Kumar of Agra and by that mobile, he was talking with the brother of this petitioner namely Ram Kumar. The police on the basis of that, reached the house of the petitioner and arrested this petitioner. The learned counsel further submitted that except this circumstantial evidence, there is nothing against the petitioner and the petitioner has got no criminal antecedents. On the other hand, the learned A.P.P. objected 2 the prayer for bail. It appears that although the petitioner is in custody since 9.8.2010. No T.I. Parade has been held and still today, nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Considering the above facts and circumstances, I direct that the petitioner named above to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000(Rs. Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 271 of 2010. Saurabh ( Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.)