IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH:AT HYDERABAD. (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR. PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION. No. 10341 OF 1991. Between Sri Sri Sri Jagannadha Swami Temple, Palakonda, Srikakulam District, rep. By its Executive Officer. …..Petitioner and 1.The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. By its Secretary, Endowments Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner of Endowments, Govt. of AP, Hyderabad 3. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, rep. By its Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 4. The District Collector, Srikakulam District, Srikakulam. ….Respondents,. (Note. The Writ Petition against Respondent No.4 was dismissed for default vide Court order dated 15-9-1998. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein, the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring that the orders of the first respondent as made in Memo No. 29673/Endts.IV/88, dated 30-1-1990 are without jurisdiction besides being arbitrary and illegal and void and consequently direct the third respondent to pay the market rate to the petitioner at Rs.3,34,000/- per acre for the total extent of land of Ac.6.51 cents delivered to the third respondent by the petitioner with interest at 18% per annum over the difference payable from 14- 3-1988 to date of realization. FOR THE PETITIONER: None appeared FOR THE RESPONDENTNos.1&2: G.P for Endowments For the Respondent No.3 : ---- The Court made the following Order: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 10341 OF 1991 ORDER: This Writ Petition is originally filed by Sri C.S.K.V.Ramana Murthy, Advocate. Earlier, when the matter has come up for hearing, the learned Counsel submitted that he had given up vakalat and record was also handed-over to the petitioner. In that view of the matter, Office was directed to issue notice to the petitioner and the same was served on 17-12-2002. In spite of the same, no advocate has come on record and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. ------------------------------------ JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY DATED: 06-12-2004. Msnr. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True copy// Section Officer To 1.The Secretary to Government of Andhra Pradesh, Endowments Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2. Commissioner of Endowments, Govt. of AP, Hyderabad 3. The Managing Director,, Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 4. The District Collector, Srikakulam District, Srikakulam. 5. One CD copy 6. One spare copy