1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Bail Application No. 7976/2010 Narendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 26.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Ashwin Garg - for the petitioner Mr Amit Poonia - Public Prosecutor BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is a case for offence under section 3/25 of the Arms Act and the weapon was recovered from the car which is said to have been given to the petitioner though he was not present at the time of occurrence. The vehicle was given by original owner Santosh Kanwar through power of attorney to one Mr Harjeet Singh. No other case is pending against the petitioner. Petitioner will maintain good conduct during period of bail. Looking to the aforesaid, petitioner may be granted bail. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 2 After considering rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am of the view that petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is accepted and it is directed that accused-petitioner namely; Narendra Singh may be enlarged on bail under section 439 CrPC in FIR No. 478/2010 registered at Police Station – Kotputali, Jaipur for offence under Section/s 3/25 of the Arms Act provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma