IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARILAL FRIDAY, THE 23RD DECEMBER 2011 / 2ND POUSHA 1933 RP.No. 935 of 2011(K) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.30104/2011 Dated 16/11/2011 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENTS 4 TO 7 ---------------------------------------- 1. MR.SHANAVAS,S/O.M.ABDUL VAHEED, SECURITY GUARD,SAPTHAZEAL,KIMS,ANAYARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,RESIDING AT T.C.32/168, SHAJAHAN MANZIL,TRAVANCORE TITANIUM PRODUCTS.P.O, MADHAVAPURAM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695021. 2. MR.RAJESH KUMAR,S/O.M.RADHAKRISHNAN, STATE NURSE,GRADE-II,KIMS HOSPITAL,ANAYARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,RESIDING AT AMBIKA BHAVAN, KP 9/596,PEROORKADA.P.O,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695005. 3. MR.AHAMED SHAMEER.M,S/O.MR.MAHEEN ABOOBACKER,SR.MEDICAL RECORDS ASSISTANT, KIMS HOSPITAL,ANAYARA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,R/A BHEEMA COTTAGE,SARVODAYAM ROAD,SANTHI VILLA, NEMOM.P.O,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. MR.SURESH KUMAR,S/O.SURENDRAN.C, SUPERVISOR-PLUMBER,KIMS ANAYARA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM R/A KOZHAKODE VEEDU,THURUVIKKAL.P.O,SRA-41, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN SRI.SEBIN THOMAS SRI.RAJAN VELLOTH SRI.PRATHAP PILLAI SRI.M.NOOHUKUNJU SAHIB RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 ---------------------------------------------- 1. M/S.KIMS HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT LTD., ANAMUGHAM,ANAYAR.P.O,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REP.BY ITS DIRECTOR(ADMINISTRATION), DR.P.MADHUSOODANAN. 2. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695001. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CITY-695001. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MEDICAL COLLEGE POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.DHANESH MATHEW MANJOORAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & K.HARILAL, JJ. ------------------------ R.P. No.935/2011 in W.P.(C) NO. 30104 OF 2011 ------------------------ Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2011 O R D E R Pius C.Kuriakose, J. Having regard to the submissions addressed by Sri.Nagaraj Narayanan learned counsel for the review petitioners, we feel that a hearing opportunity should be allowed to him in the writ petition. Hence, we recall our judgment dated 16/11/2011. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE K.HARILAL, JUDGE. dpk W.P.(C) No. /2011 2