w. HIOHGOUIirWCHHftTTigmURHAT BIU!«1*UR DIVISIONB@<CH COIWM: WCTI'BLeSHRI.MfiOISHBIUU.fcA, Ka^l.S HWBL6SHRI DULIP RAOSAUEB D®tWUKir,J. APPELLANTS: (PETITtONERS) •^-~ Wrtt Anneal No. 1S3 <rf20B7 1. Makhanlal Sto. Ra|han& agKt about 47 yeare; 2. Ajuram Sfe Jagdtsh scect aboitt 43 yeat8: 3. Mohandas S/o Pfero Ageet at»ut <Q. yeais. 4. Chainlal Mahar Sfo mdiya Teteil Dongafgaon, 0. Ra|tandga@B ^S.G^ VERSUS t. Shri (tengal te& DtaiinadhUart Sadguiu Kabir SrtiebSamift Nandlya, Tehsil Oor^ngaaT Distt Ra^Hd^en (C.G.) ~ ' 2. The Collector Rajnanc^aon Distt Rajnandgaon (G.G.) 3. Tehsjklar, Dongaigaon, District - Ra}nandgaon(CG.) WritaDDealunderArtKsleZni oftte Hiah Court of ChhattlsaatbaBDeatta DlvlsionBenchA<*a)Oer/WRule157(10ttrfeG.HK*iQQttrtRule&.200S. Present; REM'ONOBCT'S ^* Shri Anup Majunnclar, counsettorttie appellante. Shri Vinay Harit, DeputyAdvocate Genenal tbrthe State. ORALf yaase^anaywtjhSas^ The followir^ orat orcter of the Court was passed by Hon'blB.laBitldiBluBa.AB.ta. Leamed counsel forthe appellant submitB that he do»not want to, pressttiisaweal with.litiertyto flte review petltton. With IBaerfy sforesaid, thewrilappeal tecBsmissedasnotpnssed. Acting Chief Justice Sd/- DUip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge ^