K @“gabg @gmh IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION S NO. 6 OF 2009 / PETITIONERS 1. R.G. Sahu s/o Raruha Sahu, aged about 50 years. Shambhu lal Maravi, s/o Sawant Singh Maravi, aged about 52 years. ’I‘ulsiram s/o Hagaru Ram, aged about 52 years. A11 working as LDC/Assistant Grade-III in Sub Divisional Office, Rudri, District Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS // RESPONDENTS :- 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through: The Secretary, Department of Water Resources, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.). /’ 2. The Engineer—in—Chief, Department of Water Resources, Sihawa Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipur (C.G.). Chief Engineer, Mahanadi Project, Department of Water Resources, SRP Chowk, Shankar Nagar Road, Raipur (C.G.) . The WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ® ' wxatgm;.é1.x.g;.é/.EFL 2007 WW(W) MWW WWW waft-am WW wW 37mm hr S.B: Hon’ble Justice Mr. Pritinkei Diwaker 07 -08-2009: or the petitioners. Mr. Vimlesh Bajpai, counsei Mr. Yashwant Singh Thakur Dy. Advocata General for the State. By this petition the petitio ers are praying for a direction to the respondents to consider and r lease the annuai increments of the petitioners with effect from 1988, 979 and 1992 respectively Le. after one year of their joining in service. Learned counsel for the pe itioners submits that he is not pressing this petition at this stage, howeve , the petitioners may be given liberty to make detailed representation befo the competent authority of respondent No. 1 for redressal of their griev nces, to which learned counsel for the respondents has no objection. ln View of the above subm‘ sion of learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is disposed of ith liberty to the petitioners to make a detailed representation raising all their grievances raised in this petition along with copy of this order befor the competent authority of respondent No.1 within 15 days from today an on such representation being made, the competent authority of responden No.1 shall decidethe same on its own merits in accordance with law ex three months from the date of rece Sdl— Prit’mker Diwaker // r Certified copy as per rules. t I l l l Judge editiously, preferably within a period of of the representation. /,