IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.16503 of 2008 Between: 1 Janagam Rajam, S/o. Narayana, R/o. H.No. 2-56, Village Gundlasomaram, Mandal Nennella, District Adilabad. 2 Smt. Janagama Raju, W/o. Jangam Rajam, R/o. H.No. 2-56, Village Gundlasomaram, Mandal Nennella, District Adilabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Station House Officer,' I Town Police Station, Bellampally Town, District Adilabad. 2 J. Laxminarayana, S/o. Somaiah, Singareni Colleries Company, R/o. Qr.No. 4-120, Hanumanbasti, Bellampally, Adilabad District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.S.BHOOMA GOUD Counsel for Respondent No.1:AGP FOR HOME ORDER: The petitioners, who are the parents of one J.Narayana, filed the present writ petition questioning the alleged harassment by respondent No.1 in connection with a complaint given by respondent No.2 that his daughter, who was allegedly a minor, was kidnapped by their son. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on instructions submitted that on the complaint given by respondent No.2, a crime was registered by respondent No.1 under Section 366-A IPC and that it is only in connection with investigation into the said offence that the petitioners were summoned. She categorically stated that except to the extent of investigation, respondent No.1 has not been interfering with the life and liberty of the petitioners. In view of this categorical statement of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, which is taken on record, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous with liberty to the petitioners to renew this writ petition, if respondent No.1 harasses them in future. As a sequel to disposal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.21384 of 2008 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 1st JUNE, 2009. kvni