THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2582 OF 2004 DATED: 24-02-2011 Between: Mukanlal. .... PETITIONER And G.Mangalabai. .... RESPONDENT ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order, dated 29.03.2004, in R.A.No.127 of 1999 on the file of the learned Additional Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, wherein the said appeal filed by the respondent herein was allowed and the tenant was directed to vacate the premises within two months. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent. Perused the record. 3. Respondent herein filed R.C.No.148 of 1996 for eviction of the petitioner-tenant on the ground of bona fide requirement for personal occupation. Subsequently, respondent filed R.C.No.155 of 1997 on the ground of wilful default in payment of rents for eleven months from April, 1996 to February, 1997 in respect of the same premises. R.C.C.No.155 of 1997 was allowed and eviction was ordered on 24-03-1999. Against the said order, tenant filed R.A.No.110 of 1999 and the learned Additional Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad dismissed the appeal and confirmed the order of eviction. Challenging the same, the tenant filed C.R.P.No.2581 of 2004 and this Court by order, dated 16- 02-2005, dismissed the same and confirmed the order of eviction. The said order has become final. The present Civil Revision Petition which arose against the order in R.A.No.127 of 1999, wherein the said appeal filed by the landlord was allowed, directing eviction of the tenant, is therefore virtually covered by the earlier order, dated 16-02-1999 passed by this Court in C.R.P.No.2581 of 2004. Since the order of eviction passed earlier has become final, the present Civil Revision Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Interim order passed on 25-05-2004 stands vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 24th February, 2011. Tsy