<7 ••Wfmte•wm.il'"'*'"-- •. h<—^Nnw>i ^W V^<<^^ ''r'1 IN THE HI<HI CQURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. wrar rvftmas'so.S/^^ OF 2005 PETITIQNER RESPONDENTS ^ (••::: -.. i— ir.r ^•KNf»-a»'* Rameshwar Prasad, S/o Shri Mannu Lal, Aged about 30 years, R/o Ward No.7 Champa, District Janjgu- GhampafC.G.) •*'i *^1»nia.<»»nnn"-" -• VERSUS A. State of Chhattisgarh, through: The Secretary, Adim Jati Kalyan Vibhag, DKS Bhawan Raipur •^•i"*hi^f riSqitl^'?"*1 k - /3. /4. /5, (C.G.).--—" The Managing Director^ Chhattisgarh State Antyavasayi Sahkari Vikas Avam Vitt Nigam, Sector-5, Block -9 Devendra Nagar, Raipur, Distt. Raipur C.G. The Collector, Janjgir Champa, District- Janjgu- Champa C.G, The Disfa-ict Antyavasayi Sahakari Vikas Samiti Maiyadit, Branch Janjgir, District- Janjgir Champa^C.G. Sub Divisional Officer, (Revenue) Champa, District Janjgir Champa C.G. 'nmwiwre^W'! WMT PEnTION_UNDERARTIGLE ^'26/227 OF THE CONSTTNTNON OF IITOIAS FOR^^^ 1 OF AN AFPKOP1R.IATE WRIT IN TH& NATURE OF ^siiAmiAMasfGSR'naRAmsSf^.OR^^^v^^ THE LIKENATURE ETC. I """miwrt a'mtm- IN THE HIGHCOURT QF CHHATTISGARH ATBHASPUR W.P. No. 6124 of200S SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S.R.NAYAK, C.J. PBTITIONER RESPONDENTS ^^:'^. Raineshwar Prasad S/o Shri. Mapnu Lal, aged about 30 years, R/o Ward No. 7 Champa, District Janjgir Chainpa (C.G.). VERSUS 4. State ofChhattisgarh, through: The Secretary, Adim Jati Kalyaa Vibhag, DKS Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). The Maaaging Director, Cllhatdsgarh State Antyavasayi Sahakari Vikas Avam Vitt Nigam, Sector-5, Block-9 DevendraNagar, Raipur, District RaipurfC.G.). The CoUector, Janjgir Chauipa, District-Jailjgir Chauipa(C.G.). The District Aatyavasayi Sahakari Vikas Samiti ftlaryadit, Braach Janjgir, District-Janjgir Champa (C.G.) Sub Divisional OfScer, (Revenue) Champa, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.). Mr. Rakesh Paadey, couiisel for the petitioner. Mr. Utkarsh Venaa, Panel lawyer for the respondents/State. :i,4t!r \-< '^••" ORAL ORDER (9th December, 2005) There is aa error apparcnt on fhe face of the order of the District CoUector impugned in this Writ Petition. It is quite apparent fhat fhe District CoUector has passed the impugned order without issuiag notice to the petitioner, and wifhout giviag opportunity ofbeuig heard to him. Affected should be appraised is a constitutional creed flowing froin Ardcle 14 postlllates. There is a Qagrant violation of principtes of natuial justice aad the impiigned order, therefore, cannot be sustained. In the result, the impugned order is quashed. However, fhis order shatl uot coiae ia the way of fhe CoUector froin takmg appropriate action agam.st fhe petitioner and after giviag 1iim an opporturuly ofbeiiig heard. Accordiagly, the Writ Petition is aUowed. No costs. Sd/- ChiefJustice ~--^-