IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.CHELAMESWAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN THURSDAY, THE 1ST JULY 2010 / 10TH ASHADHA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 435 of 2010(S) ------------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.14259/2009 Dated 02/06/2009 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER: ----------------------------- P.K.PADMANABHAN, S/O.KARUTHAKUNJU, AGED 61 YEARS, RETIRED NMR WORKER, RESIDING AT MOOLAKKATTUPARACKAL, THIRUVARPU PO, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.S.RAMESH BABU RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT: -------------------------------- SMT.R.S.ANU, AGED AT ABOUT 52 YEARS, WIFE OF (NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) WORKING AS SECRETARY, CHENGANNUR MUNICIPALITY, CHENGANNUR. BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.S.HARIKRISHNAN THIS CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J.Chelameswar, C.J. & P.N.Ravindran, J. ------------------------------------------ Cont. Case (C) No.435 of 2010 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 1st day of July, 2010 JUDGMENT Ravindran, J. This contempt case was filed alleging that the directions issued by this Court in the judgment delivered on 2.6.2009 in W.P.(C) No.14259 of 2009 have not been complied with. 2. The respondent has sworn to an affidavit dated 22nd June, 2010 wherein it is stated that the terminal benefits remaining unpaid as on the date of the presentation of the contempt case have been paid on 8.6.2010 and 10.6.2010 respectively. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the said submission is factually correct. In such circumstances as the judgment of this Court has been fully complied with, we find no grounds to proceed further with the Contempt Case . It is accordingly closed. J.Chelameswar, Chief Justice P.N.Ravindran, Judge vns