(1) wpst30460-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO. 30460 OF 2011 Shaik Irfanuddin Hanifuddin PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. N.B. Khandare, advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. K.M. Suryawanshi, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State. Mr. H.I. Pathan, advocate for Respondent No. 2. Mr. R.J. Godbole, advocate for Respondent No. 3. Mr. C.V. Dharurkar, advocate for Respondent No. 4. Mr. M.V. Ghatge, advocate for Respondent No. 5. ..... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 29th NOVEMBER, 2011 ORAL ORDER: 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. The basic grievance of the petitioner is that though he is a regularly appointed Head Master, due to the in-fighting between the Management, he is unnecessarily being deprived of his rights and has been suspended. 3. We find that any order passed by us in this (2) wpst30460-11 petition would be in conflict with the orders passed today by us in Writ Petition No. 8315/2011, Writ Petition No. 8333/2011 and Writ Petition No. 845/2011. However, from the perusal of all the four petitions, it appears that two fractions of the Management are fighting against each other to grab the control of the Management. It appears that now- a-days, the Educational Institution instead of being run as service-oriented Institutions, have become a source of various groups to indulge into unnecessary litigation to grab over the control of the Management. The ultimate sufferers in such situation are the students and to a great extent the teaching and non-teaching staff in such Institutions. In such situations, the employees are also required at times to take stand supporting one group or the other group. It unnecessarily affects the career of the students. We, therefore, direct the respondent State Authorities to appoint the Administrator on the Educational Institution, namely, Alam Nawaz Jung Education Society, Sevli. The same shall be done within a period of two weeks from today. The Administrator who shall be an employee of the (3) wpst30460-11 Education Department, shall continue to manage the affairs of the Trust till the dispute of the parties is resolved by the competent Authority under the Bombay Public Trusts Act. 4. In that view of the matter, after the appointment of the Administrator, the petitioner would be at liberty to make a representation before the Education Officer which shall be considered in accordance with law. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. [M.T. JOSHI, J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] npj/wpst30460-11