IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1349 OF 2003 Shakil Karim Tamboli ...Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... Mr.Uday Warunjikar for Petitioner. Ms.S.R.Kumbhat, A.P.P. for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. JANUARY 17, 2005. JANUARY 17, 2005. JANUARY 17, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This matter was listed along with other matters indicating that common order will be passed. However, as I intended to pass separate order in this matter, the Court Staff was told to inform Mr.Warunjikar, who is the Advocate on record for the Petitioner that this matter will be taken up after lunch break. When the matter is called out, the Sheristedar informs that Mr.Warunjikar has been informed that the matter will be taken up after lunch, however, none appears for the : 2 : Petitioner when the matter is called out. It appears that even in the past, this application was dismissed for default on two occasions, and restored. Hence, dismissed for non-prosecution. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.