IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-24455 of 2008 Date of Decision: November 11, 2008 Kamaljit Singh and another … Petitioners Versus State of U.T. and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present: Mr. Harnek Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Sunil Kaushik, Advocate, for respondent No.5. S.D. Anand, J. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he would be content and interests of justice would be served if a direction is issued to respondent No.3 – Senior Superintendent of Police, Chandigarh, to look into the grievance of the petitioner in the course of the complaint (Annexure P/3). The petition shall stand disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 – Senior Superintendent of Police, Chandigarh, to look into the grievance of the petitioner, in the course of the complaint (Annexure P/3). The exercise shall be concluded within one month from today. Disposed of accordingly. November 11, 2008 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge