THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.26203 OF 2006 ORAL ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material on record. Absolutely, no case is made out to show that the impugned sale notice dated 17.11.2006 was issued in violation of the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short “the Act”), and the Rules made thereunder. The petitioner is also not disputing its liability. In the circumstances, the mandamus as prayed for cannot be granted. However, this shall not preclude the petitioner to work out the remedy available under Section 17 of the Act, if so advised. Subject to the above, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. ______________ (G. ROHINI, J.) 18th December, 2006. Kgr THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 26203 OF 2006 18th December, 2006. Between: M/s K.S. Tobacco Company Private Limited, Boduppal village, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, represented by its M.D., V. Krishna Suri. .. Petitioner. And Union of India, represented by its Secretary, Finance and Planning Department, New Delhi and another. .. Respondent.