1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1419/2009 Deepali Asaram Ghuge .. PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others .. RESPONDENTS .... Smt.Anjali Dube,Adv.for petitioner. Shri K.G.Patil,AGP for R.1. Shri S.T.Shelke,Adv.for R.2. Shri Alok Sharma, Asstt.Solicitor General for R.3 & 4. .... CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & R.K.DESHPANDE,JJ. DATE : 03/07/2009 ORAL ORDER : This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by which petitioner prays for directing respondent no.2 to issue call letter to the petitioner for the Prathamik Shikshan Sevak Pre-Recruitment Centralized Examination 2008, which was held on 31/8/2008. In essence therefore, the petitioner seeks interference of this Court for issuing directions to the respondents to call the petitioner for interviewing the petitioner and also to permit her to participate in the further stages of the selection process. 2. It appears that since the petitioner was duly qualified and the 2 fact that the petitioner belongs to Vanjari caste which is recognized as a Nomadic Tribe (D) category, the petitioner desired to appear to the written examination which was conducted by the Prathamik Shikshan Sevak Pre-Recruitment Centralized Examination. The petitioner accordingly submitted her application and issued with the admit card. The petitioner appeared for the examination and passed the said examination successfully securing 56.37% marks. Since the petitioner had passed the said examination, the petitioner was awaiting receipt of the interview call. The interview call list came to be issued by the Education Department (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Nandurbar. Unfortunately, call letter which was received by the petitioner on 31/1/2009 in respect of interview which was scheduled to be held on 15/12/2008 at 9 a.m. Since call letter was received by the petitioner belatedly, the petitioner obviously could not attend the interview and therefore, immediately submitted representation to the authorities for consideration of her case sympathetically and to interview the petitioner for the recruitment of the said post. The petitioner, however, did not receive any favourable reply and therefore, has filed the present petition. 3. Notice of this petition came to be issued to the respondents by order of this Court on 3/4/2009. On receipt of the notice of this Court, the respondents are represented by Shri S.T.Shelke, learned counsel 3 who appears on behalf of respondent no.2. It has been brought to our notice by Shri S.T.Shelke, learned counsel for respondent no.2 that the posts which were reserved for Nomadic Tribe category i.e. 39 posts have all been filled in and as the selection process in respect of the post for which the petitioner had been issued the call letter for interview is already over and the petitioner therefore, now cannot be interviewed denovo as the selection process which is over. In the light of that, therefore, according to us, though unfortunately it may seem that the petitioner had received call letter late and could not participate in the interview, no relief can be granted to the petitioner as the entire selection process is completed. In the light of that therefore, we dismiss the petition with no order as to costs. [R.K.DESHPANDE] [P.V.HARDAS] JUDGE JUDGE umg/wp2671-09