IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25186 of 2009 MAIKAL BASKI, SON OF LATE CHANDER BASKI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 20.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that there is no allegation of any specific overt act against the petitioner and the First Information Report itself shows that there is only one injury sustained by the deceased and the petitioner has remained in custody since 16.03.2008, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5000/-(five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge(F.T.C.-5), Kishanganj in connection with Bahadurganj P.S. Case No. 44 of 2008(S.T. No. 694/2008) subject to the conditions that (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner (ii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Since the charge was framed on 13.08.2008 2 itself, there is no reason not to examine the witnesses. If other accused persons are not appearing, stringent steps should be taken for their appearance so that the progress of the trial should not hamper. Shageer (Anjana Prakash, J)