IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16372 of 2009 DHANANJAY KUMAR Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 15.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. There is allegation of taking of money in the name of providing job, for which submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that money, if any, was paid to the co-accused Tunnu Kumar Singh. Petitioner has been shown his Personal Assistant for which rejection of the petitioner’s anticipatory bail is not justified. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Daudnagar P.S. Case No. 222 of 2008, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Daudnagar, District-Aurangabad subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)