D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (WRIT) NO. 240/2008 Jod. Vid. Viteran Nigam Ltd. Vs. Dist. Legal Aid Date : 02.05.2008 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. HON'BLE MR. CHAND MAL TOTLA, J. Dr. G.R. Kalla for the appellant. = = = = Heard learned counsel for the appellant. The respondent was paying according to the bills issued by the appellant and still an additional demand was raised which has been deposited by the petitioner respondent. Thereafter, he approached the Permanent Lok Adalat for redressal of his grievance. After considering the facts of the case, the Permanent Lok Adalat reached to the conclusion that the bill has been raised illegally. Learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant finding no illegality in the order impugned. After going through the reasons given in the impugned order, it appears that the petitioner respondent was paying according to the bills sent to him. However, in the subsequent bill, an additional demand has been raised, which according to the appellant has been levied because of the reason that the petitioner respondent used load more than the sanctioned load i.e. petitioner respondent consumed load of 529 KV in place of 500 KV. We are of the view that there is no illegality in the order impugned. Hence the impugned order passed by learned Single Judge and by Permanent Lok Adalat is affirmed. We do not find any merit in the appeal. The appeal of the appellant is dismissed. (CHAND MAL TOTLA), J. (PRAKASH TATIA), J.