C-482 No. 41 of 2008 Hon'ble B.C. Kandpal, J. By way of this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 05.10.2007 and order dated 21.06.2007 passed by IIIrd F.T.C/Additional Session Judge, Haridwar in Session Trial No. 86 of 2002, State Vs Brahmpal. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent No. 2 filed a F.I.R. against the unknown person on 25.08.2001, under Section 376, 302 of I.P.C. During trial the learned Session Judge examined P.Ws. The Prosecution moved an application before the learned Additional Session Judge to re-examine P.W.7 which was allowed and 06.07.2007 was fixed for her evidence vide order dated 21.06.2007. Thereafter , the defence filed objection against the application for re- examination. The learned District Judge vide order dated 05.10.2007 dismissed the objection and allowed the application for re-examination against which the petitioner preferred this petition. Heard Sri Nagesh Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner on the point of admission and perused the record. Having considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the documents field before me, I am of the view that there is no flagrant injustice and abuse of process of court in this case. The learned Sessions Judge has afforded opportunity to re-examine the witness to the prosecution in the interest of justice. The prosecution has made the plea that due to unavoidable circumstances some important facts could not be brought in the evidence of P.W. 7. The court was satisfied with the reasons shown by the prosecution. I do not find any infirmity in the impugned orders. The petition lacks merit and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the petition field under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed in-limine. (B.C.K., J) 11.08.2008 ASWAL