WPCRL No. 32 of 2011 Hon’ble V. K. Bist, J. (Urgency Application No. 314 of 2011) Mr. Pramod Bailwal, Advocate, present for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Govt. Advocate, present for respondents No. 1 and 2. Heard. On due consideration, the urgency application stands allowed. WPCRL No. 32 of 2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner is an innocent person and has falsely been implicated in the criminal case. It is further submitted that even if the contents of the first information report are taken to be true no offence is made out against the petitioner. Lastly it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no criminal history of the petitioner. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after going through the papers on record, considering the nature of the offence, this court is not inclined to interfere with the investigation of the case. The contents of the first information report fully disclose the offence as against the petitioner. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed with the observation that if the petitioner Dhan Singh Chauhan surrenders before the court concerned, and moves application for bail, his bail application shall be heard and disposed of without unreasonable delay, preferably on the same day. (Stay Application No. 484 of 2011 also stands disposed of). (V.K. Bist, J.) Vacation Judge 25.01.2011 HN