CRLA No. 1403 of 2001 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon. Dharam Veer, J. Shri Pankaj Purohit, Amicus Curiae for the appellant/applicants. Shri Tanuj Semwal, A.G.A. for the State. This is application No. 441 of 2009, received through Superintendent Sitarganj Jail, Udham Singh Nagar, where the appellants Charan Singh, Pawan , Naresh and Preetam, are serving out the sentence, awarded by the trial court (Additional Sessions Judge, Roorkee), vide its judgment and order dated 20.03.1998, in Sessions Trial No. 45 of 1996, under Sections 148, 302/149, 307/149. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the judgment and order dated 17.01.2008, passed by this Court in criminal appeal NO. 1403 of 2001 (Old No. 673 of 1998), criminal appeal No. 1404 of 2001 (Old No. 835 of 1998) and criminal appeal No. 1405 of 2001 (Old No. 840 of 1998), whereby the judgment and order passed by the trial court was affirmed. Simple prayer made in the application, moved on behalf of the appellants/applicants is that the sentence awarded be modified by setting aside the sentence relating to direction to pay the fine. The fine has been imposed by the trial court (apart from the imprisonment awarded) relating to offences punishable under Sections 307 and 302 I.P.C. Under both these sections, convict is required to undergo imprisonment and also required to pay fine. In such circumstances, it cannot be said that the trial court has committed any error of law in directing the convicts to pay fine apart from undergoing sentence of imprisonment awarded against them. Even otherwise unlike civil cases, as provided under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, there is no power to review the order passed by the court. Section 362 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, permits the court only to correct the clerical or arithmetical error in the judgments. As such, we are unable to modify the sentence, which is passed by the trial court and affirmed by this Court vide its order dated 17.01.2008, passed in criminal appeal No. 1403 of 2001 (old No. 673 of 1998), criminal appeal No. 1404 of 2001 (Old No. 835 of 1998) and criminal appeal No. 1405 of 2001 (Old No. 840 of 1998). For the reasons as discussed above, application for modification of sentence is hereby rejected. (D.V., J.) (P. C. P., J.) Dt. 05.05.2009 S