IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1841 of 2007 MOST.LALITA DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 19.8.2009 It is stated in the show cause filed by the Municipal Commissioner, Gaya Municipal Corporation that all the lawful dues of the husband of the petitioner have already been paid to her. Regarding Group Insurance as claimed by the petitioner, the stand taken is that it was not applicable in the case of the petitioner’s husband .With regard to bonus and payment of difference of salary on the basis of pay revision, the stand taken is that the same can only be paid after the allotment in that regard is received from the Government. Regarding the payment of difference of the retiral benefits on the basis of the said pay revision, the stand of the opposite party is that the State Government has not released the fund on account of pay revision and, therefore, the retiral benefits have also been calculated on the basis of the old pay scale and further when the amounts shall be received from the State Government, the same will be paid to the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid stand of the opposite parties, this Court is of the view that there is no deliberate disobedience of the order dated 8.8.2006 under contempt. The contempt application is, accordingly, disposed of taking note of the said stand of the opposite parties and the statements made by learned counsel for the Gaya Municipal Corporation that whenever the amount is received from the State Government on 2 account of pay revision, the retiral benefits of the petitioner shall be recalculated in the light of the new pay scale and the difference of retiral dues as also the difference of salary for the period applicable shall be paid immediately thereafter. VPS (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.)