IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 21ST JANUARY 2011 / 1ST MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 39226 of 2003(T) ------------------------ PETITIONER : -------------------- K.K. REJIMOLE, KOCHUPARAMBIL HOUSE, EDAKKADATHY P.O., KOTTAYAM (FORMER U.P.S.A., TRMMUPS, EDAKKADATHY P.O. BY ADVS. SRI.ABRAHAM VAKKANAL, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.SAJI KURIACHAN SRI.M.R.NANDAKUMAR SRI.PAUL ABRAHAM VAKKANAL RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVT., GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ASST. EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KANJIRAPPALLY. 3. THE MANAGER, T.K.M.M. U.P. SCHOOL, EDAKKADATHY P.O. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER R3 BY ADV. SRI. SRI.S.EASWARAN SRI. E.SUBRAMANI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- WP(C).No. 39226 of 2003(T) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : COPY OF APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 9-6-1997 WITH APPROVAL ORDER TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2 : COPY OF G.O.(MS)NO. 240/2000/G.EDN. DATED 24-7-2000 OF THE GENERAL EDUCATION (J) DEPARTMENT. EXT.P3 : COPY OF REVISION PETITION WITHOUT EXHIBITS DATED 15-2-2003 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT. EXT.P4 : COPY OF G.O.(RT)NO. 4297/03/G.EDN DATED 22-10-2003 OF THE GENERAL EDUCATION (H) DEPARTMENT. EXT.P5 : COPY OF LETTER NO.61452/H3/03/G.EDN DATED 3-12-2003 OF THE GENERAL EDN. (H) DEPT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS - NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mn T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J. ------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.39226 Of 2003 ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 21st DAY OF JANUARY, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner herein challenges the orders Exhibits P4 and P5 with regard to refusal of approval of appointment to her. The learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent -Manager submitted that the petitioner was appointed in a later vacancy in terms of the directions issued by this Court in Writ Appeal No.1273/2004 and the Writ Appeal was allowed in her favour and pursuant to the interim directions in that appeal, she has got appointment also and the order of the learned Single Judge was set aside. Finally, the Division Bench directed her approval of appointment also from the date on which the interim order was passed. In the light of the above, nothing survives in the Writ Petition and hence the same is dismissed. Sd/-( T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn True copy P.A.to Judge