IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7511 of 2008 BABY ROY Versus INDIAN OIL CORPORATION & ORS ----------- 2 13.5.2008 Heard the parties. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to cancellation of the dealership of one Respondent no.5, Mamta Roy in whose favour the KSK Dealership has been allotted by the Respondents. Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the Indian Oil Corporation (I.O.C.) submits that there is an inbuilt internal mechanism for looking into such complaint and in case the petitioner chooses to file the same, it will be looked into and decided by an authority nominated by Managing Director of the Indian Oil Corporation. In the light of the aforementioned submissions of the parties, this Court gives liberty to the petitioner to file a self contained complaint to the Managing Director of Indian Oil Corporatin and in the event of filing of such a complaint by the petitioner, the same would be disposed in three months by a speaking order by an officer not below the rank of General Manager of the I.O.C. as may be nominated by the Chairman I.O.C. It is however made clear that such nominated officer must 2 be one who is posted in the Head Office of the I.O.C. and had not been associated with the selection process of petitioner vis-à-vis Mamta Roy (Respondent No. 5). With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ application is disposed of. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)