HIGH COUKT OF CHHAmSOARH. BILASPOR W.P.(St No. 601.5 of 2007 PETITIONER Ku. Uma Yadav d/o Stori C.L. Yadav, Aged about 25 years, R/o B.D. Mahaat, New Chandniya Para, Jaajgu', District Jaajgu: Champa(CG) Versus RB8PONDEBT8 1. State of CMiattisgarh through the Secretaiy Food and Civil Supplies and Consiuner Protection Dcpartment, DKS Bhawaa, Raipur, District Raipui(CG) 8. The Director, Food aad Civil SuppUes and Consuaxer Piotection Department, DKS Bbawan, Raipur(CG) 3. Clihattisgarh Professioiial Examiuation Board through the Secretaiy Raipur(CG) WRIT VETinaS UNlDERAR'!3CLB2a6 OP THE CX>n8TITUION OF MDIA Appearance: Shri B.R.Ghosh, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel I^awyer for the State on advance copy, ORALORDER (10.10.2007) SUmL KUMAR SIHHA. J. Heard on adinission. The pctitioner has challcnged the cxintents of advertisemcnt dated 18<h July 2007, publishcd in Rojgar Aur Nyojan ia connection with fflling of the vacant post of Food and Civil Szipplies Inspector. Lcamed counsel for thc petitioncr subinits fhat. the petitioncr is aggrieved with the qnalification fixcd for thc said post vide column No. 4 (i) (a), which says fhat thc candidate should be graduate from any recognized universily. He subinits ttiat apart. froin tlie said qualification, pTeference shoiild tae given to those candidates, who have quaUfication of degree/diploTna in Food & Technolc^y and a mandamus should bc issued in fhis rcgard. Needless to say that thc qualifications are based upon thc statiitoiy provisions applicable -for appointment to a particular post and fiirther prefercnce ete. are also based on statutoiy ?%?SB:S;%®^^SS^^ WP(S) 6015/2007 provisioTis as also on flie policy inade by the State in this regard. Unless a violation of statutoiy Rules or tlie Act is sfeown with regard to fixation of niinimuin qualification or with regard to fixation ofpreference ete,, a inantlamus caunot he issued by a writ Court for doiag so. On the basis of the pleadings inade in the writ petition and also on the ground pressed before ttiis Court by leamed counsel for the petitioner, no casc for interference is inade out Thc petitjon has no merits and the same is dismissed at tlie motkm stage itseIC | Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge synita