IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6913 of 2010 1. RASHMI KUMARI D/O AMLA PD. SHARMA, W/O RAGHWENDRA SHARMA R/O VILL ATWA KARN, P.O.BARI RAIBHAN, P.S.MIRGANJ(HATHUWA),DISTT-GOPALGANJ---PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR-IN-CHIEF, HEALTH SERVICES GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR, HEALTH SERVICES SARAN DIVISION, CHHAPRA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE GOPALGANJ 5. THE CIVIL SURGEON CUM CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER GOPALGANJ 6. THE INCHARGE MEDICAL OFFICER, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE KATEYA, DISTT-GOPALGANJ 7. THE INCHARGE MEDICAL OFFICER, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE HATHWA, DISTT-GOPALGANJ-------------RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 18.1.2011 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State, this Court fails to understand as to why the petitioner has filed a writ application for scrutiny of the issue under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, as the appointment in question was a contractual appointment based on a contract entered between the parties. The issue thereof can be looked into by a civil court of competent jurisdiction as breach or otherwise of such contract can not be put to scrutiny of writ court. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and therefore his case will be maintained under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, which includes the relief for direction for payment of salary which according to petitioner amounts to beggar has no application to the fact and issue. In view of what has been observed above the contention of the petitioner is a misplaced kind of submission. This writ application is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)