IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7079 of 2009 SUSHILA DEVI @ SHANTI DEVI wife of Late Kapildeo Singh, resident of village- Changodih, (Kahardih) P.S.- Khaira, District- Jamui. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2. The Secretary Dept. of Rural Development, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3. The District Magistrate, Jamui 4. The Block Development Officer, Chakai, Jamui. 5. The District Provident Fund Officer, Munger 6. The District Provident Fund Officer, Jamui 7. The Directorate, Provident Fund Pant Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna ----------- 2 29.06.2009 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, State and the respondent Accountant General. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that her husband died in harness in the year 1972 and despite making several approaches by the petitioner, who is an illiterate widow, she could not get the admissible retiral dues of her husband. A copy of such representation is annexed as annexure to this writ application. Learned counsel for the State submits that the grievances of the petitioner shall be looked into without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of the grievances, as raised in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a comprehensive representation - 2 - before the respondent no.4 giving all the relevant details with regard to his grievances as also to the respondent nos. 5 & 6 with regard to payment of provident fund dues with statutory interest. In this view of the matter, it is directed that in case such separate representation is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order, the concerned shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. Upon consideration, if the representation is disposed of in favour of the petitioner, the above respondent shall simultaneously issue necessary orders so that the grievances as raised in the representation of the petitioner could be redressed without delay in the light of the order passed by him on such representation. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)