IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12988 of 2010 DAYALU SAO, S/o Sri Birju Sao, R/o Village-Jamuyawan, P.S.-Khizar Sarai, District-Gaya. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 10.12.2010 The petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 17.12.2009 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Khizar Sarai P.S. Case No. 122 of 2009 by which he has taken cognizance under Section 290 IPC and 47(A) of the Excise Act. It has been submitted that the supervision note speaks of the implication of only the co-accused, Niranjan Sao the brother of the petitioner and does not show the complicity of the petitioner. However, on going through the First Information Report, I find that huge amount of liquor was recovered from the shop of the petitioner as well. In view of such, there is no justification for quashing of the order of cognizance. The application is dismissed. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)