1 ao507-508-509.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Appeal from Order No. 507 of 2011 WITH Civil Application No. 704 of 2011 IN AO No. 507/2011 Ikon Builders and Developers ....Appellants v/s. The State of Maharashtra & ors. ....Respondents WITH Appeal from Order No. 508 of 2011 WITH Civil Application No. 705 of 2011 IN AO 508/2011 WITH Appeal from Order No. 509 of 2011 WITH Civil Application No. 706 of 2011 IN AO 509/2011 Mr. Arvind Jaywant Patil & ors. ....Appellants v/s. The State of Maharashtra & ors. ....Respondents Mr. N.V. Walawalkar, Sr. Counsel for the appellants. Mr. H.S.Anand for respondent no.5. Mr. V.S.Mhaispurkar-AGP for respondents 1-3. CORAM: R.M. BORDE, J. 04th October, 2011 PC: These Appeals from Order can be disposed of by directing the trial Court to decide the pending Notice of Motion expeditiously. The Judge of the City Civil Court is directed to decide pending Notice of Motion as expeditiously as 2 ao507-508-509.11.sxw possible preferably within four months from today. While deciding the pending Notice of Motion finally the Court shall not be influenced by the observations made by the Court while refusing to grant ad-interim relief in the matter. It would be open for both the parties to urge the contentions and make submissions in accordance with provisions of law and Court below would be obliged to consider all the submissions and contentions those would be raised by the respective parties while arguing the Notice of Motion. The parties shall have liberty to file additional affidavits, w.s. or documents within a period of four weeks from today. 2. With these directions, above Appeals from Order stand disposed of. In view of disposal of Appeals from Order, respective Civil Applications do not survive and stand disposed of. (R.M.BORDE, J)