THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA C.R.P. No. 1021 and 1064 of 2010 Common order: These two C.R.Ps. are directed against the separate orders dated 19.02.2010, passed by the II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, allowing the applications in I.A. Nos. 1582 and 1682 of 2009 in O.S. No. 1180 of 2007, praying to grant leave to receive certain documents in evidence and to recall D.W.1 for further evidence on the ground that the certified copy of GPA-cum-agreement of sale could not be filed at the time of filing written statement as it was not available with him at that point of time. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the evidence of the respondent-defendant as D.W.1 is over, and in the absence of any pleading with respect to the document and in the absence of reason shown by the respondent as to why he could not file the certified copy of GPA-cum-agreement of sale at the time of filing written statement or at least at the time of his evidence, the Court below ought to have dismissed the present applications filed by the respondent praying to receive the said document in evidence and recall D.W.1 for further evidence. He submitted that since the orders under revision, passed by the Court below amounted to permitting the respondent to fill up the gaps in his evidence, the same are bad in law, and prayed that the orders under revision be set aside, and the C.R.Ps. be allowed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the orders under revision. As can be seen from the orders under revision, the evidence of the respondent as D.W.1 is over. The suit is based on the sale transaction of an immovable property. As the GPA-um-agreement of sale was not available with the respondent at the time of filing written statement, he did not file the same along with the written statement, and immediately upon obtaining certified copy of the same, he filed application praying to receive the said document in evidence, and as by the time, his evidence was already over, he filed another application praying to recall D.W.1 for further evidence. Since the evidence of the respondent is not closed and the matter was coming up for further evidence of the respondent, and since the respondent merely wanted to mark the same in evidence, and considering the fact that the respondent could not file the same along with the written statement as it was not available with him at that point of time, the Court below allowed the present applications filed by the respondent praying to receive certified copy of GPA-cum-agreement of sale and recall D.W.1 for marking the said document, and no exception can be taken thereto, and more so when the relevancy or admissibility of the same would be looked into at the time of appreciation of evidence. In the above view of the matter, this Court finds no reason whatsoever to interfere with the orders under revision in exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The C.R.Ps. are devoid of merit, and they are accordingly dismissed. No costs. ________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 25th June, 2010 KSR