WP(C) 2095/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. RP Sarmah, learned Sr. counsel for the petitioner as well as M r. K. Paul, learned CGC. The petitioners who offered their candidatures for the post of Constable (GD) in the CRPF, are aggrieved by non-inclusion of their names in the final merit list . According to the petitioners, they having qualified in the selection securing more marks than the cut off marks fixed for OBC and General category candidates and also having cleared the medical test, ought to have appointed. The respondents have filed their counter affidavit in which details regarding nu mber of vacancy and the candidates appointed have been indicated. Although the p etitioner No. 1, an OBC category candidate, had secured the qualifying marks of 36, but could not be included in the merit list for appointment as the last cand idate securing 36 marks who could be appointed, is older in age than the petitio ner. Such a course of action is adopted on the basis of the guidelines formulate d by the CRPF. As regards the petitioner No. 2, he having failed to secure the cut off marks of 41, he could not be appointed. The petitioner No. 2 secured only 37 marks. In view of the above, no wrong is attributed to the respondents and accordingly, no relief can be granted to the petitioners. Writ petition is dismissed.