SCA/7835/2005 1/2 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 7835 of 2005 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================== 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ============================================================== CPWD REGISTERED ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION(GUJ.) - Petitioner(s) Versus DIRECTOR GENERAL OF WORKS & 5 - Respondent(s) ============================================================== Appearance : MR PR NANAVATI for Petitioner No(s).: 1. MR JITENDRA MALKAN for Respondent No(s).: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,6. ===================================================================== CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA and HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Date : 02/08/2005 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA) Rule. Learned Assistant Solicitor General Mr. Malkan appears and waives notice for the respondents. SCA/7835/2005 2/2 JUDGMENT 2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Out of three grievances made in this petition, one is already redressed. Learned Assistant Solicitor General Shri Malkan states that if proper representation is made to the competent authority for redressal of the remaining grievances, then the same may be considered and decided in accordance with law. In that view of the matter, learned counsel Shri Premal Nanavati seeks permission to withdraw this petition at this stage with a liberty to make proper detailed representation to the concerned authority within a fortnight from today. If such a representation is made within a fortnight from today, then the same may be considered and decided by the authority in accordance with law as early as possible and preferably within one month from the receipt of such representation. Accordingly, permission is granted. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn at this stage with a liberty to file fresh petition in case the decision is adverse. Rule discharged. No costs. Direct Service permitted. ( B.J. Shethna, J. ) ( M.C. Patel, J. ) hki