IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.7206/2010 Raj Bahadur Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order : 6.8.2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr. Sailesh Kumar Panwar for the accused petitioners Mr. Amit Poonia, Public Prosecutor for the State ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for the accused petitioner is that the allegation against the petitioner and other 3 accused is exactly the same. Learned counsel submitted that co-accused Devi Lal and Yogendra have already been enlarged by the Co-ordinate Benche of this Court vide orders dated 12.5.2010. Case of the present petitioner is, in no way, distinguishable with that of co-accused who have already been enlarges on bail. Petitioner and co-accused were arrested on 13.12.2009 and since then he has been in jail, while co- accused have already been enlarged on bail about 3 months earlier. . On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Considering the rival submissions and without expressing any opinion on the merits of this case but taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail during trial. Resultantly, the bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Raj Bahadur Singh S/O Shri Bane Singh shall be released on bail in F.I.R. No. 112/2009 of P.S. Mandawar, district Jhalawar on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till conclusion of the trial. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. Thanvi