IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1778 of 2005 MOST.SHAKUNTALA DEVI Versus PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Bishwa Bibhuti Kr. Singh, Adovcate. --------------- P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal ---------- Dated, the 8th July, 2008. We heard the counsel for the parties. 2. The only grievance that is pressed by the counsel for the petitioner is that the retiral benefits and dues have not been paid as per the new scale. 3. The counsel for the opposite parties invited our attention to the show cause and the supplementary show cause. It transpires therefrom that the retiral benefits have been paid but in old pay scale. 4. From the order dated 23.7.2004, it does not transpire that this court has held that the petitioner’s husband was entitled to get retiral benefits in the new pay scale. 5. Be that as it may, in our considered view, no case for proceeding further in the contempt proceeding is made out. - 2 - 6. M.J.C. is accordingly disposed of. The petitioner, however, will be at liberty to agitate her grievance that her husband was entitled to retiral dues in new payscale in appropriate proceeding. R. M. Lodha, CJ Kishore K. Mandal, J Anil/