1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 249 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2675 OF 2006. M/s. Chirag Plaza Pvt. Ltd. ..Petitioner. v/s. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. ..Respondents. And M/s. Aaruhi Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. ..Applicant. .... Mr. S.C. Naidu, i/b. C.R. Naidu & Co., for Petitioner. Mrs. Nita Madhyan, i/b. S.M. Asso., for Applicant. Ms. T.H. Puranik, for Respondent-BMC. .... CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 31ST AUGUST 2010. P.C. Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties. 2. The learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner states that he has no objection if the Chamber Summons filed by the Applicant is allowed. Chamber Summons is accordingly, allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendments to be carried out within a period of one week from today. 3. Chamber Summons is accordingly,disposed of. [ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ]