IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27673 of 2008 UPENDRA RAI @ BODIA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 23.12.2008 Heard Mr. S. N. Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D. Mehta, learned A.P.P. The four accused persons named in the F.I.R. are the persons, who had fired at the deceased, who happened to be the brother of the informant. The learned Addl. P.P. read out some of the statements of the witnesses indicated in the case diary that also indicates that of similar allegation. By drawing attention of the Court to the copy of the post mortem examination report it is contended that the injuries no.1 and 2 were communicating to each other like injury nos. 3 and 4 which indicated that those were wounds caused by same shot. It is further indicated by the fact that injury nos.1 and 3 are the wounds of entry and those at serial nos.2 and 4 are the wounds of exit. It is contended, as such, that in the light of uncertain allegation as to whose shot killed the deceased, the petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. Let petitioner named above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Patna, in connection with Phulwarisharif (Gopalpur O.P.) P.S. case no.384 of 2007. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )