IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 1475 of 2009. [O&M] Date of Decision: 15th July, 2009. Ram Kala & Ors. Petitioners through Mr. R.N.Lohan, Advocate Versus Bhan Singh and others. Respondents through Mr. K.S.Dhaliwal,Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL) This Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 14.1.2008 passed by learned Civil Judge [Senior Division]-cum- Executing Court, Narwana whereby the petitioner's execution application has been dismissed. The petitioner filed Civil Suit No. 64 of 1990 seeking possession of agricultural land comprising Khasra No.244 situated within the revenue estate of village Bikhawala, Tehsil Narwana, District Jind. The suit was decreed on 13.11.1995 and the first appeal filed by the respondent – Judgment Debtors was also dismissed on 4.6.1999 by the learned District Judge, Jind. The petitioner filed an Execution Application in which the Halqa Kanungo was asked to carry out the measurement at the spot and hand-over physical possession of the suit land. The Halqa Kanungo appears to have reported twice that the Decree Holder – petitioners had refused to accept possession at the spot. The Executing Court has dismissed the petitioners' execution petition based upon that report. Notice of motion was issued and in response thereto, learned counsel for the parties have been heard at some length. Learned counsel for the petitioners argues that both the reports submitted by the Halqa Kanungo, in collusion with the Judgment Debtors, are false. Be that as it may, it is not in dispute that the Decree Holder – petitioners are yet to get physical possession of a part of the Khasra No. 244, in relation to which their suit was decreed. It can not be, thus, said that the decree stands satisfied. For the reasons aforementioned, the revision petition is allowed; the impugned order dated 14.1.2008 is set aside and the execution application filed by the petitioners is ordered to be revived. The Executing Court is directed to depute a Revenue Officer not below the rank of Naib Tehsildar, who shall visit the spot, carry out the measurements and ensure that possession of the disputed property is delivered to the decree-holders. The needful shall be done as early as possible and not later than six months from today. The parties are directed to appear before the Executing Court at Narwana on 10th August, 2009. Disposed of. Dasti. July 15, 2009. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE