ss*t Pstiiioners Dilcants HiGH COURT OF CKHATTSSG^^H AT BILASPUF W.P. {Art.227$ No.2887 of 2311 1. Savitri Osvi W/'o Baijnath Agrawal, aged about 71 ysars; 2. Santosh Agrawai S/'o Baijnath Agrawa!, aged about 52 yesrs, 3. Mohan Agrawai S/'o Baijnath Agrawa!, aged about 47 years, Non-appiicants 4. Pankaj Agrawa! S/o Baljr Agrawa!, aged sbout 42 years, 5. Lata Agrawal D/o Baijnath Agrawal aged about 40 years, 6. Madhu Agrawai D/o Agrawa!, aged about 37 years, 7. Sarita Agravi/ai D/o . Baijnath Agrawa!, agsd about 34yeare, 8. Uma Agrawai D/'o Baijnath Agrawai, aged about 31 years, are R/o Gandhiganj, R^garh, District.Raigarh (C.G.) Versus 1. Grih Nirman lyiandai, Tnrough: Exeeutsye Engineer, Grih Nirman Mandal, Raigarh. 2. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the Collector, Raigarh, District-Ralgarh (Wrii Petltion under Articie 227 ofthe Gon^itutjon of India) Mr.Santosh Kumar Tiwari, counssl for the patiiionera. Mr.Aiok Kumar Gupta, coun^i for respondent No.1. Ms Sangeeta MiCTira, Panel Lawyer for respondent No.2/Stats. (SB: Hon'bie Mr. T.P. Sharma, J.) ORDER (29-8-2011) 1. By this wr;t petitton under Articie 227 of the Constttution of India ths petitioners havs chaiiengsd the iegaiity and propriety ofthe order dated .;»*. '"^ ^ 'l ^^ z- M^ ^ 4.12.2010 passed by 3rd Civil Judge Ciass-li, Raigarh in M.J.C.No.13/09. 2. After some arguments, iearnsd counsei for ths petitioners seeks to withdraw this writ petition wlth liberty to fije revision In terms of Section 115 (1) ofthe Code of Civii Procedure, 1908. 3. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid iiberty. Certified copy of the order impugned be returned to ihs couns®!for the petitioners after furnishing duly photostat copy of the same. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma judge 1,;