1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6448 OF 2009 1) Suraj s/o Narsingrao Pawar, 2) Vikas s/o Rajkumar Jadhav, 3) madhuri d/o Umakant Panchal, 4) Aarti d/o Ramesh Panchal ...PETITIONERS. VERSUS The State of Maharashtra Through the Secretary, Ministry of School Education and others. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri.P.M. Shah senior counsel with Shri. Y.R. Marlappalle Advocate for the Petitioners. Smt.R.K. Laddha, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1. Shri.V.R. Sonwalkar Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND K.U. CHANDWAL, JJ. DATE : 5TH DECEMBER, 2009. 2 PER COURT : 1. The learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners makes a statement that result of Petitioner No.1 - Suraj s/o Narsingrao Pawar is declared. The purshis to that effect is placed on record. In the light of the statement made, the Petition to his extent is disposed of. 2. In respect of the remaining Petitioner Nos. 2, 3 and 4, we have verified the answer sheets with the other answer sheets. We do not find any error in the view adopted by the Board in passing the impugned orders. The Petition in respect of the Petitioner Nos. 2, 3 and 4 is dismissed. [K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.] asb/DEC09/wp6448.09