1 wp2604.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2604 OF 2010 Vipul @ Gotya Anand Udgude & ors. ....Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. ....Respondents Mr. Devendra M Upadhye for the petitioners. Mr. D.P. Adsule-APP for the State. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND P.D.KODE, JJ. DATED:- OCTOBER 11, 2010. P.C. Considering the fact that investigation has been completed and chargesheet has also been filed, the Petitioner may pursue such other remedy as may be advised before the concerned Court. The question of quashing of FIR in the fact situation of the present case does not arise as alongwith the chargesheet material has been submitted by the Investigating Officer before the concerned Court. The efficacy of the said material can be looked into while considering the Application for discharge. That, however, cannot be the ground for quashing of FIR as such. Besides, we find no force in the grievance made in 2 wp2604.10 the Petition that the investigation of the case should have been entrusted to CID. There are no allegations of bias against the Investigating Officer. 2. In our opinion, the relief in terms of prayer clause (ii) is an attempt to the create confusion so as to protract the criminal action pending against the Petitioner before the appropriate Court. 3. Petition dismissed with liberty to the Petitioner as aforesaid. (P.D.KODE, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)