3mm 33mm 0‘3 1N THE HIGH COURT Uh JUDICATURE CHHAHTlSGAKl—l Al BILASPUR W.P.N0. 394Lz 2005 K Rajendra Kumar Jain Aged about 41 years, S/Q Shri Nathmal Jain, R/o Dongargaon, Tehsil — Dongargaon Dist: Rajnandgaon—(C.G.), Petitioner \ g9 . % _~%§\”§ Versus 1‘ State of Chhattisgarh, Through — Secretary, General Administration, D.K.s. Bhawan, ‘ Raipur-(C.G.] Responde nts 2. The Tehsildar, Dongargaon, Dist : Rajnandgaon—(C.G.) The Collector, Rajnandgaon, Dist : Rajnandgaon—(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UVDER ARllCLEb 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA f“f-M f W 3am, , w 4 @44; mm ' "nuu unun in 200$— u.u..n.n.uuu.nn.u mm m ’ 7 WM§WW - éa‘wm 01,932095 7 Shri eEpak Jai, couns S Vivak hn, Palm Hear. y is w tia 1 CGnstittion of ndia, petinm‘ who is working on the post of Asstt. Grads- in Tahsil O$ f€ om h Do t efitiémer submits that 1:116 distanca garh is 50 K111i. He further submits ame1y Smt. Amrita Jain is working Village Kumardha which is at the gaOh, Sihce the husbaild alld wife 1; therefore, it was possible for his g and performed her duties. He also the ’petitiOiier fromi DOHgaIgaon t0 it for the Wife of the ,petiiioner to m alono in ngaxgao m ubmits that acrding i0 tho golicy of the Stato Govan‘tmen: as far a hsbad ad Wifo should prosent order of Tns (lat Sta: polic for" tho petitionar. E n t Lawyer for the State! rospontiants. hri Saua ? d 1 filed under Article 226] 227 of ths By Wa of th rit pdi‘ Iu I mstine 1H o trai1sr fr Dongargao to Married curise for t befxvll Dongargaon t Dallg thatthe Wif€ of 1116 pétronar ‘ as‘AN‘Ia/L, Su Haal ente istace of 1: : fom Dong aro 1i11g gother in ogargé wifo t go tollsr pla. ofpostj ubmits that afte transfor f ’ Dongargarh it ouldbo clifficu di Served her duties. He {Luther E DOn a S co 09$iblc. >u has .ohallengod the ’vah'dity of his ngargarh. be posted at one place and the l 31.07.2904 is in violation of the (deem) m mm 1 Nm 3 ‘ L ol he 1 ge o w i‘i 1' V b th Cr, dn 1 Km ir ; iv to Do f o ce ’n o r o w‘ 7 s un n rafer ex t y 1 r r XI-HC—ZZ WQMO. WWW mm k¢m %a¥%qan%¥r ~ 2,. etitionér draws the att€ntion of this Lkaineci r‘ounsel for the Court towaldb Annexule P] 2 x hlch 1s all aldEr of camwllahon by winch 1s hamsfm‘s Older 0f so é pawns of the transfex 11st datPd 31.072004 havg been cancelk on the ground ofv1olatxon of pohcy itsxelli . I haVE perussdfhe recm 1s of m6 Writ petition and have also 11¢a1‘d tho argomenté of learn d coonsal for tho petitionor as W611 as raspandegts. It appears ‘to me that fter passing of tho order of o‘ansfer vide Annexura-P/ 1 which reL violation ofino'licy‘ If' the. Stat haS ontm‘tained tho application or i‘eprésentation of 01116.: similéu tho order of. transfer theli 111m the State £01“ not entertainiii which accelo’ing to obopathiol In tho far/jg and Circumg that the pei’itioner shall flied Certifled copy of thisvorder an the competent authority ’with‘ if Such a representation is decidethe senile érs early as p weeks from}, the receipt of th 13 was no reason with the authority of g the application of the petitioner, 1er was tiled on 2208.2004‘ ‘ ‘x : r §té11ce3 of the. ease, i do hereby ilirect a cietailed reinreseritation along with d the copy of the Writ petition before H1 Va period of 15 day from today and flied, the competent authority shall beeible preferably Within a peiiod of S said representation on the analogy 3am,m,i§amg{ mm \ m . o...ho.t..oooo on. E 200$ mun..unuuouuu. ”no. ‘ damd 203.3064 and also’ on Wife. . With the af0r€sajd obSE. disposad of. . Cm‘tiflmi copy aa p3? ruk VJ e the policy rsgarding husbandand Watiens, tht: patition stamis iinally Sd/— Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge ( %%%% r mm,m,m m . N‘v. Mo, 34411 '11:: 200$ mama wwwwm R#$a&v mmm $Wm <3 Jig: .f’;_a\o.lr ¢ ; appliaflwjgqi 1116 cams of pers'mis mentioner} 1'11 callcdlation ord‘er