CWP No. 23088 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No. 23088 of 2011 Date of decision December 13, 2011 Ravi Joshi ....... Petitioner Versus Chandigarh Administration and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Rohit Khullar, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?No 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?No K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. A staff under suspension orders has apprehension that by virtue of the instructions of the Chairman of the Bar Council, he will not be allowed to enter the Bar Council Premises and that he will lose his right of valid defence in a disciplinary case which is pending against him. According to him, he has also moved some applications for collection of information under the RTI Act and therefore he has to go to the premises. If he has any particular reason to go to the premises, he shall issue an appropriate notice to the Officer Incharge and seek permission giving out the reason as to why he seeks entry into the premises. On such permission the petitioner can visit the Bar Council premises. Otherwise, it shall be lawful for the Chairman of the Bar Council to regulate the entry of persons in the Bar Council premises. I find no reason to interfere but I have made this clarification to allay the apprehension of the petitioner that even his legitimate right to defend himself will be barred by the impugned CWP No. 23088 of 2011 2 order. 2. The writ petition is disposed of with the above observations. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE December 13 , 2011 archana