IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No.: 4749/2008 Decided on: 24.06.2010 ______________________________________________________ Maina Devi ..…..Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others ..…. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Yudhvir Singh Thakur, vice Shri K.D. Shreedhar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General. Sanjay Karol, J (oral) The petitioner has assailed the appointment of private respondent No.4 as an Anganwari Worker. The fact that petitioner was otherwise ineligible at the time of selection and appointment has not been disputed by the petitioner inspite of a specific stand taken by the Respondent in this return. As per the guidelines only candidates between the age of 21 to 45 years could have been considered and appointed. Admittedly, petitioner was 19 years of the age at the relevant time. 2. That apart, the respondent-Authority had laid down criteria of Awarding 10 marks for Educational qualification, 10 marks for past experience and 10 marks General Knowledge Respondent No. 4 was found to be more meritorious and was accordingly selected and appointed. There was nothing wrong with the said selection process. …2… 3. Hence, it cannot be said that any legally enforceable right of the petitioner is violated, petition being devoid of any merit is dismissed. No costs. . (Sanjay Karol), Judge June 24, 2010 “BRB”