^ •"'fe-'^ir'' BEKK-; c BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.fQ No. ^-< ^ArL^ OF 2011 Petitioner ^* ^2^'%, / ^ ^ -^ ^ < 1 'L^-:^--^ < Respondents ,,'t' ^ ^' .^yy/ ^s/ ^°^y ^y ^ ^yy w Rajaoo Rain Thakur @ Perdeshiram, aged about 40 years, S/o. late Shri Soninath, R/o. Modal Town, Road No.9, Ward No.l, Junwani, Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.) Versus :1) State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary Town 8& Country Planning, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, G.E.Road, Raipur (C.G.) :2) Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, District Durg through Cominissioner (G.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CON8TITUTION OF INDIA ! ii. ;.2,^®i!u«"Nl—"i" /f^"'y%. '% HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WRIT PETITION (Q No. 2642 of2011 Rajaoo Raiii Thakur (d Perdesfau-am. RESPONDENTS VERSUS itate of'Ciiliattisgarh & Aiother. WRI'T' PETmON 'ITNDER AR'HCLE 226 OF THE CONSITTm'lON OF INDlA, SB: Hfln'bte Shri Satish K. Aenihotri. J. Present: Shi'i Dilip Smgh Rathore- Advocate for the petitioner. Sliri V.V.S.Moorthy, Deputy Advocate General forthe Stae/respondeiit No. 1. Si-iri li.B.Agrawal, Seaior Advoeate with Smt. Meera Jaisv/al, Advocate ibr the respondent No. 2. OSDER(ORAL) (Passed cn 13th day ofMay. 2011) 1. By this petition, the petitioner sseks auashing cfths notice dated 19.04.2011,, issued by the respondent No. 2/Corporatioii, without iUmg response to the same. 2. Leanied counsel appearine for the respondent No. 2..'Corooration subniits that ifths petitioner files lus response to the above notice wifhin a penod ot' 10 days, no action shal! be taken bv the respondeat No. 2/Corporation, without coiisidering tfae responss of tlie petitioner in accordancs with law. 3. In view of the above, according to leamed counsel &r tlie petitioner. aoithing survives ibr aajudieation in this matter. . Accordmgly- Ihe wrrt pe'titioii is disposed of Sd/- ,-- Satish K. Agnihotiri Judge Amrt 1