IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND NOVEMBER 2011 / 11TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 29093 of 2011(J) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- SHAHIDA,AGED 34, W/O.RATHEESH, KALATHIL HOUSE, PONNARIMANGALAM, MULAVUKADU P.O. BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MULAVUKADU POLICE STATION, MULAVUKADU. 2. PUSHPAMANI O.B,D/O.O.B.KAMMATH,AGED 47, KALATHIL HOUSE, NEAR GOVT. HOSPITAL, PONNARIMANGALAM, MULAVUKADU, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. GEETHAMANI,W/O.NITHYANANDA NAIK, AGED 50,DOOR NO. 35/2312 A, PIPELINE ROAD, PALARIVATTOM, COCHIN -25. 4. NITHYANANDA NAIK,AGED 57,S/O.VASUDEVA NAIK, DOOR NO.35/2312 A, PIPELINE ROAD, PALARIVATTOM, COCHIN-25. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.DHANESH MATHEW MANJOORAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.29093/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 04/10/2011 SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER BEFORE 1ST RESPONDENT. P2 COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 23/03/2011 SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER BEFORE 3RD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO.JUDGE sts PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No. 29093 OF 2011 ------------------------ Dated this the 2nd day of November, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. In the nature of the decision which we are proposing to take in this writ petition, it is not necessary to issue notice to the party respondents. The grievance voiced by the petitioner is that respondents 3 and 4, who are sisters of the owner of the building occupied by the petitioner as a building tenant, are giving all sorts of trouble to her peaceful life. They are even trying to create a situation wherein the petitioner will be compelled to vacate the building. 2. We find that Ext.P2 petition has been submitted by the petitioner voicing all her grievances before the first respondent Sub Inspector of Police. We direct the first respondent to take up Ext.P2 immediately and to conduct enquiry into the correctness of the allegations therein. If the enquiry reveals that the petitioner's allegation in Ext.P2 is true, the first respondent WPC.No.29093/2011 2 will take such steps as are necessary for protecting the life and limbs of the petitioner and also for the peaceful residence of the petitioner with family in the building in question. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM,JUDGE. dpk