1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 26405 OF 2009 Alex Christopher D’Souza & anr. ... Petitioners v/s Maxie Jerome Cabral ... Respondent Mr.Prakash Shah for the petitioners. Mr.V.R.Walawalkar i/by S.R.Bhalekar for the respondent. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 27TH NOVEMBER, 2009 P.C.: 1. It is contended on behalf of the review petitioner that the review petition was not heard on the day the order was passed and the reply which was filed in Court by the review petitioner has not been considered while passing the order dated 24.9.2009. The respondent i.e. the review petitioner, chose to remain absent on 24.9.2009 and on several earlier occasions and hence the matter was heard on 24.9.2009 in the absence of the review petitioner. The learned advocate for the respondent in the review petition i.e. the applicant 2 in the civil application, had pointed out that he had received a copy of the reply filed of the review petitioners. However, no reply was placed on the record of this Court and, therefore, the reply has not been considered. In my view, no case for review has been made out. 2. Review petition dismissed. ..... 3