IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41367 of 2009 1. VIVEKA RAVIDAS S/O BAHADUR RAVIDAS 2. CONGRESS RAVIDAS S/O LATE BHUMESHWAR RAVIDAS 3. UGREJ RAVIDAS S/O LATE BHUMESHWAR RAVIDAS 4. BASANT RAVIDAS S/O LATE GAINI RAVIDAS 5. BASUDEO DAS @ RAVIDAS S/O LATE BAHADUR RAVIDAS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 2.2.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioners are named in the first information report on the basis of suspicion and it is a case of at best having been last seen with the deceased and there is no motive for the occurrence, let the petitioners above named, who are in custody since 8.9.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Banka in Amarpur P.S.case No.129 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not an accused in any other case and if they are they shall not be released on bail and (iii) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to - 2 - do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )