IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20885 of 2009 KRISHNA KUMAR @ BHAJJU Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 30.06.2009 Heard both sides. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under section 392 of Indian Penal Code. As per the allegation in the F.I.R., the Branch Manager (informant) along with two persons were returning on motorcycle after withdrawing a sum of Rs. 2 lacs from another bank for payment to customers. It is stated that three persons riding on motorcycle overtook them and thereafter committed robbery. The informant was robbed of his bag containing cash on gun point. From the impugned order, it appears that in course of investigation, one witness has identified the petitioner as one of the accuseds involved in commission of the robbery. The petitioner is in custody since 17.2.2009. Having regard to the allegation and the materials available in support thereof, this court finds no merit in the application. It is, accordingly, rejected. However, if the trial of the case is not completed within 10 months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the petitioner shall have liberty to renew his prayer for bail. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J )