((-1-)) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.286 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO.2643 OF 1987 Mubarakunnisa w/o Mohammed Naseem since deceased through heirs and LRs Plaintiffs versus Minuddin Mohd. Usman Khan and others Defendants Mr.A.N.Maniyar for plaintiffs. None for defendants. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 19th April 2006 PC : 1. Shri Maniyar appearing for the plaintiff makes a statement that the Chamber Summons has been served on the defendants and he will file an affidavit proving service of the same within one week from today. 2. In the affidavit in support it is pointed out that as far as description of the immovable properties are concerned, the same are described ((-2-)) more particularly in Annexure-A to the plaint. However, one immovable property namely agricultural land in the State of Uttar Pradesh has not been included although it is mentioned in item no.9 in the said annexure but specifications and details including survey/gat numbers are not set out. Therefore, it is only with regard to incorporation of these details, that the plaint is sought to be amended. No prejudice will be caused as the property is sufficiently described in the plaint as well as above mentioned annexure. 3. I am satisfied that the amendment does not change the cause of action nor does it in any manner take away any accrued rights. It is formal in nature. Chamber Summons is, therefore, made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks. No order as to costs. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)