§ ! « i i é § Pe‘titioner ’ % é I ResgonéeMs (Writ Petiticn under Article 226i227 of the Constitutmn of mma.) SB: Hon’bte Mr. Satish K. A§nihotri, J None for ihéjrietitiojwerk Sh:§ j >§Esgnt The matter is caned for hearing twice. ORDER l (Passed on Mm November,2§8?) On both occasions, hone y appears nor any representation is made an behaff of the pei‘rtioner. petitioner may not be interested in the matter 2) In View of the above; the writ hetitton is dismisseé fer want of ’ M i Sd/— . i t :Satish K. Agnihott‘i i i ‘Jud‘ge i prosecution. «m HIGH COURT OF CHHATTt Writ Petition No. 74E Zita Bar SGARH: EILASPUR i of 2005 Sahkari Krishi Aur Gramin Vtkas k Maryadit Biiasour, through the Chi=f Executive Omcer, Zila Sahkari Biia MaEadit, Kr; “xi our, Aur Ch‘nattisgarh. Biiaspur, Gramin Tart. ‘v’ikas and Bank Distt. Versus ‘i The ;State of Chhatttsgar‘n, through the Secretary: Department of Cooperative, Dau r Katyen Singh Bhawan: Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 Registrar/Commissioner, éooperative Societies, Raipur (Ch‘nattisgarh). 0’. v; \ Zita Sahkari Krishi Aur Gramin Vikas Bank Man/edit, Kawarciha, through its Chief Executive omcer, Zila Sahkari‘ Kriehi Aur Gramin Vikas Bank Maryadit,§ Kawardha, Distt. Kawardha; g’Chhattisgarh). 1 SK. Mishra‘ Pane! Lawyer for the state. The i . ‘ ’