IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN FRIDAY, THE 18TH MARCH 2011 / 27TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 33885 of 2010(I) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- HUSAIN, K.P.HOUSE, VENGAI P.O., MYNAGAPPALLY, KUNNATHOOR TALUK, KOLLAM, KERALA, PIN-690 520. BY ADV. SRI.SOORANAD S.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM, KOLLAM-1. 2. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM, KOLLAM-1. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SASTHAMCOTTA, SASTHAMCOTTA P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-690 521. 4. VAHAB, S/O.MOHAMMADU KUNJU, C.K.HOUSE, VENGAI P.O., MYNAGAPPALLY, KUNNATHOOR TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT-690 521. 5. SRI.MOHAMMADU KUNJU, C.K.HOUSE, VENGAI, MYNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT-690 521. 6. JAMEELA BEEVI, W/O.MOHAMMAD KUNJU, C.K.HOUSE, VENGAI, MYNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT-590 521. Kss ..2/- .....2.... WPC.NO.33885/2010 I *ADDL.R7 & R8 IMPLEADED: R7. DISTRICT OFFICER, DISTRICT POLLUTION CONTROL OFFICE, KOLLAM - 1. R8. MYNAGAPPALLY GRAMA PANCHAYAT REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, GRAMA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, MYNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM - 690 519. (*ADDL.R7 & R8 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DTD. 12/01/2011 IN I.A.NO.469/11). R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. C.M.CHARISMA R4 TO R6 BY ADV. SRI.K.ABDUL JAWA R8 BY ADVS.SRI.SIJU KAMALASANAN, SRI.A.MUHAMMED RAFFI. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss R.BASANT & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. *********************** W.P(C) No.33885 of 2010-I ***************************** Dated this the 18th day of March, 2011 JUDGMENT BASANT, J. There is no representation for the petitioner. The learned counsel for respondents 4 to 6 submits that licence issued to the petitioner has been cancelled by the panchayat. The learned counsel for the panchayat submits that licence has not been granted. There is no representation for the petitioner. It appears to us that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this petition in the light of the circumstance pointed out by the learned counsel for respondents 4 to 6. This Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed for non prosecution. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE) rtr/ 2 R.BASANT & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. *********************** W.P(C) No.33885 of 2010 ***************************** Dated this the 4th day of January, 2011 ORDER BASANT, J. Respondents 1 to 3 have entered appearance through the learned Government Pleader. Respondents 4 to 6 have entered appearance through their counsel. Counter affidavit has been filed by respondents 4 to 6. In the light of the counter affidavit, the petitioner wants to array additional respondents in this Writ Petition. The Pollution Control Board and the Local Authority which granted the licence will have to be impleaded, it is submitted. 2. We grant the petitioner time to take necessary steps. Take all necessary steps within a period of 7 days from this date. 3. Call on 12.01.2011. We make it clear that we have not issued any interim orders in the matter. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE) rtr/