j r-,.^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR F.A. fM) No. IQ^- / 2011 Appellant Applicant No.2 t.'^'y'^'v^^^:\ 3sr^' Versus Respondent Applicant No.l Smt. Reena Ahuja, W/o Shri Jai Kumar Ahuja, 25 years, D/o Shri Raj Kumar Khillani, R/o Kelkar Para, Raipur-(C.G.) Jai Kumar Ahuja, S/o Shri Gopichand Ahuja, 27 years R/o Behind Jhulelal Mandir, Shyamnagar, Raipur-(C.G.) APPEAL U/S 19 OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT,1984 ..<A^ ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ; BILASPUR F_A. (M) No. 102 of. 2011 Appellant Smt. Reena Ahuja Versus Respondent Jai Kumar Ahuja DB: Hon'ble Mr. I. M. Quddusi, & Hon'ble Mr. G. Minhajuddin, JJ. Shri Mayank Chandrakar, Advocate for the appellant. O R D ER (oral) ( Passed on this 9th day of November, 201.1 9. 3. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant does not press I.A.No.l for condonaton ofdelay. As per the office .report, the appeal is barred by limitation. In view of the above, the application for condonation of delay is dismissed as not pressed, Consequently, the appeal is dismissed as time barred. As prayed, the appellant shall bc at liberty to file a fresh petition before the Family Court, in accordance with law. Sd/- Dr. I.M. Quddusi Judge Sd/- G. Minhajuddin Judge Thakur