IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 13479 of 2008 Between: Vangivarapu Naga Veera Phaneendra S/o.Veerabhadreshwar Rao rep.by its his natural father and guardian ie.the above referred Person) R/o.Mulukuduru(V) Ponnur(M), Guntur District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Rajiv Gandhi University rep.by its Deen O/o.State Council for Higher Education, Beside Telephone Bhavan, Lakadi-ka Pul Hyderabad 2 Z.P.H.S Machavaram Rep.by its H.M Ponnuru(M) Guntur District 3 Director Board of Secondary Education S.S.C Chapel Road Nampally Hyderabad 4 District Educational Officer Guntur District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to declare the eligibility of the candidate i.e., son of the petitioner student with Roll No.0439187 by declaring the inactions of the respondents as illegal, arbitary, contrary to law against to the principles of natural justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.KATRAPATI SATYANARAYANA (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13479 of 2008 ORDER: On 26.09.2008, when the writ petition came up for hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It indicates that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. ________________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY,J 16.10.2008 v v