IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.7478/2010 Jagdish Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order : 4.8.2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mrs. Kamla Jain for accused petitioner Mr. Amit Poonia,Public Prosecutor for the State Mr. G.S. Rathore for the complainant ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for the accused petitioner is that the allegation against the petitioner is one under Section 136 of the Electricity Act and except the present one, there is no other criminal case ever registered against him. Similarly situated co- accused Rameshwar and Vishnu have already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide orders dated 21.7.2010 and 28.7.2010 respectively. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail applications. Considering the rival submissions and without expressing any opinion on the merits of this case but taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail during trial. Resultantly, the bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Jagdish S/O Shri Radhey Shyam shall be released on bail in F.I.R. No. 134/2010 of P.S. Kaithun, district Kota on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- each together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till conclusion of the trial. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. Thanvi