.[1]. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.204 OF 1999 Mulund Rohidas Nagar Sai Shraddha Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., and Anr. ...Petitioners. Versus The State of Maharashtra and 6 Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr.S.G.Surana, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr.M.Kajale, A.G.P., for the State. Mr.V.Mahadik, Advocate for Respondent-B.M.C. .... CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 23, 2006. NOVEMBER 23, 2006. NOVEMBER 23, 2006. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned A.G.P. for the State and the learned counsel for the respondent- Corporation. 2. Mr.Surana, the learned counsel for the petitioners states that respondent No.7 has already been allotted the land with regard to which the petitioners had made an application for allotment to the State Government. Mr.Surana, the learned counsel for the petitioners further states that since the land has already been allotted to .[2]. respondent No.7, the petitioners have already made representation to the State Government seeking redressal. In view thereof, the learned counsel for the petitioners is not-pressing the above Petition. He only seeks relief that the representation of the petitioners should be decided by the State Government as expeditiously as possible. 3. Under these circumstances, we direct the State Government to decide the said representation of the petitioners as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from today. 4. Writ Petition stands disposed of accordingly, with liberty to the petitioners to adopt appropriate proceedings if they have still any grievance. Interim order granted by this Court in favour of the petitioners also stands vacated. [DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.] .[3]. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]