IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 37049 of 2011 Date of decision: 8.12.2011 Siri Chand and another petitioner vs State of Haryana respondent Present:- Mr. Adish Gupta, Advocate. M.M.S.BEDI, J. Petitioner No.1 is alleged to have sold land beyond his share to petitioner No.2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated without there being any criminal offence being made out in the complaint filed by Naresh Kumar Aggarwal. Heard. It appears that the FIR has been registered on the directions of ACJM, Faridabad while entertaining a complaint u/s 156(3) Cr.P.C. The matter is still under investigation. The investigating agency has not opted to present charge sheet against the petitioners on the basis of the material gathered. It is always open to the investigating agency to cancel the FIR in case it is a case of civil nature and no offence is made out on the basis of the material gathered. The petition is, thus, pre-mature. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh in case the prosecution agency opts to present challan against the petitioner. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. December 8 , 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE