WP(C) 1725/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MADAN B. LOKUR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AK GOSWAMI The petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated 17.3.2011 passed by the Central Ad ministrative Tribunal in Misc. Petition No. 45/2011 in O.A. No.37/2011. A disciplinary enquiry was held against the petitioner on the ground that he had taken the official vehicle without submitting any tour programme and without in timation to his controlling officer. It was further alleged that he was driving the vehicle which collided with the railway line iron gate post and was badly da maged resulting in loss of Rs.1,40,263/- to the exchequer. The petitioner was found guilty of the charges levelled against him and a penalt y was imposed on him by order dated 23.12.2010. By the order dated 23.12.2010, i t was directed that recovery of the damage amount be made in 6 (six) installment s. Feeling aggrieved by the penalty order, the petitioner preferred O.A. No.37/2011 before the Central Administrative Tribunal and that application is still pendin g adjudication. The petitioner moved an interim application in the Tribunal for a stay of the or der dated 23.12.2010. The interim application was rejected on the ground that it was not a fit case for grant of an interim injunction. We are in agreement with the view expressed by the Central Administrative Tribun al. It is only some money that is sought to be recovered from the petitioner and no irreparable injury is likely to be caused if the interim injunction is declined. There is no doubt that if the Original Application is decided in favour of the petitioner, an appropriate order can be passed by the Tribunal including a direc tion to return the amount recovered from the petitioner. We decline to entertain this writ petition against the interim order since it ha s no merit. Dismissed.