1 caf4222-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION rpa CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4222 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1672 OF 2010 Annasaheb Shankar More .. Applicant V/s. Malanabai D. More (Since deceased through his LR's) Manohar Dattatray More & Ors. .. Respondents ..... Mr. G. N. Salunke i/b. Mr. V. S. Kokitkar for the applicant. Mr. Manoj Patil for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. ..... CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : MARCH 25, 2011 P.C.:- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant and the learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 (Original Plaintiff). 2. During the pendency of the suit, the possession of the first and second respondents was protected by interim order of the Trial Court. The first and second respondents have succeeded and apart from the decree for specific performance, there is a decree for perpetual 2 caf4222-10 injunction passed by the trial Court by which possession of the first and second respondent has been protected. In the circumstances, prayer clause (b) of this application cannot be granted. As far as prayer (a) is concerned, only a limited relief relating to clauses (5) and (6) of the operative part of the decree will have to be granted. 3. Hence, I pass following order : :: O R D E R :: i. Prayer (b) is rejected. ii. There will be interim stay of execution and operation of clauses (5) and (6) of the operative part of the decree. iii. No order as to costs. iv. Hearing of the Appeal is expedited. JUDGE