1 wp.9451.2010.sxw mnm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9451 OF 2010 Indo Rama Synthetics (I) Ltd. ...Petitioners Vs. Union of India & Ors, ...Respondents Mr. V. Shridharan with Mr. Prakash Shah i/b. PDS Legal for the Petitioners Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly with Mr. J.B. Mishra for Respondents 1 to 6 Mr. A.S. Rao for Respondent No.7 CORAM: J.P. DEVADHAR & SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. DATED: 10TH MARCH, 2011 P.C. 1. Although several questions are raised in this Petition, at the hearing Mr. Shridharan, Counsel for the Petitioner pressed the dispute only on the question as to whether the office of the Respondent No.3 was justified in summoning the Chairman and Managing Director of Petitioner No.1 Company for recording evidence. 2. Mr. Jetly, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Respondents 1 to 6 on instructions states that the office of the Respondent No. 3 is not pressing the summons issued to the Chairman-cum- Managing Director and the same may be treated as 2 wp.9451.2010.sxw cancelled/withdrawn provided the Chairman-cum-Managing Director gives an undertaking to the effect that the statement of the officers/employees of the Company recorded or to be recorded would be binding on him. 3. Mr. Shridharan states that an undertaking of the Chairman- cum-Managing Director to the effect that the statement of the officers/employees of the Petitioner No.1 already recorded or to be recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1944 with Section 14 of the Central Excise Act shall be binding upon the Petitioner Company and Managing Director would be filed within two weeks from today. 4. The Writ Petition is disposed off in the above terms. (Smt. Roshan Dalvi, J.) ( J.P. Devadhar, J.)