IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7114 of 2010 AWADHESH YADAV . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 8.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The defence of the petitioner in a Police case under Sections 387/34 of the Penal Code is the statement made at the Bar that he has no criminal antecedent. The allegations are of ransom call from a specified mobile number mentioned in the F.I.R. The impugned order of rejection states that the call details recorded in Paragraph-64 of the case diary shows the involvement of the petitioner also. There is no further discussion as to what was the link between the petitioner and the mobile number in question. The order rejecting bail is a serious matter dealing with the liberty of the citizen. Its require reason specially to be amenable to judicial review. If the petitioner has no other criminal antecedent in that event only, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional 2 Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha, West Champaran at Bettiah in connection with Dhanaha P.S. Case No. 82 of 2009. Let a copy of this order be placed before the Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Bagaha who passed the order dated 18.1.2010 in Bail Petition No. 492(B)/09. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)