1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5896 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 12613 OF 2009 A. Dhanabai W/o Laxman Marathe, (Deceased) Through L.R.s. A-1 Fakira S/o Laxman Marathe, Since Deceased Through L.Rs. A-1/1 Babulal Fakira Marathe, Age : 45 Years, Occu. : Agril., R/o Brahmanpuri, Tq. Shahda, District Nandurbar. 1-1/2 Sau Sundarbai W/o Subhash Marathe, Age : 50 Years, Occu. : Agril., R/o Saukheda, Tq. Shahada, District Nandurbar. A-2. Chhagan S/o Laxman Marathe, Age : 65 Years, Occu. : Agril., A-3. Magan S/o Laxman Marathe, Age : 62 Years, Occu. : Agril., A-4. Tukaam S/o Laxman Marathe, Age : 60 Years, Occu. : Agril., All R/o Brahamanpuri, Tq. Shahada, District Nandurbar. B. Sumanbai W/o Bhanudas Marathe, Age : 55 Years, Occu. : Agril., R/o As above. .. .. Applicants/Appellants 2 Versus 1. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Medium Project, Dhule. 2. The State of Maharashtra, Through Collector, Dhule (Now Dist. Nandurbar) .. .. Respondents Shri R. C. Patil, Advocate for the Applicants/Appellants. Shri K. G. Patil, A. G. P. for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : B. R. GAVAI, AND N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 12TH AUGUST, 2009. ORAL ORDER [Per N. D. Deshpande, J. ] : 1. Heard Shri R. C. Patil, learned counsel for the applicants and Shri K. G. Patil learned A.G.P. for the respondents/State. 2. This is an application for time to deposit the deficit court fees. The applicants/appellants who are original claimants in land acquisition reference case No. 34/2000 decided by learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Shahada by judgment and award dated 30.01.2003, preferred first appeal which came to be admitted after condonation of delay today and also heard at the stage of admission with consent of both the parties. 3. The said appeal was filed for enhancement of compensation 3 on deficit court fees stating reasons that, they could not arrange for court fees due to poverty and urged for four weeks time to supply the deficit court fees. 4. There is no specific claim found in the appeal and also application is also silent about the same and the required court fees to be paid. Moreover, the appeal after hearing both the sides came to be dismissed, as such the application does not survive and accordingly disposed of. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [ B. R. GAVAI, J.] bsb/August 09