IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINTAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 1057 of 2008 Raj Kumar Sharma and others …………Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ……..Respondents Mr. Bhuwanesh Joshi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Nand Arya, A.G.A. for the State. JUDGMENT Hon’ble J.C. S. Rawat, J. Mr. Bhuwanesh Joshi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Nand Arya, A.G.A. for the State. 2. Learned A.G.A. for the State before this Court that it has been indicated in para 2 of the Counter Affidavit that the police has completed the investigation and after completion of investigation the police has found that there is a prima-facie case against the petitioner nos. 1&2 (Raj Kumar and Smt. Shanti Sharma respectively). It has also been alleged in the counter affidavit that there is no prima- facia case against the petitioner nos. 3, 4 & 5 (Anil Sharma, Vidhy Bhusan Sharma and Lalji Sharma respectively). As such, the police has submitted the chargesheet before the Circle Officer against the petitioner nos. 1 & 2. It was further submitted that in view of the above the writ petition filed by petitioners seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against them has, now, become infructuous. As such, the police is likely to submit the final report/chargesheet, as the case may be, before the competent court in the near future. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. However, interim order dated 31.12.2008 shall remain operative till the final report or chargesheet, as the case be, is filed before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated: 20.02.2009 LSR