IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34536 of 2010 PAPPU YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ---------- 03/ 03.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Allegedly, the petitioner and others made indiscriminate firings as a result of which informant’s husband sustained fire arm injuries of his thigh and died then and there. The informant has stated in her fardbeyan that it was the petitioner and co-accused Munna Yadav, Raj Kumar Yadav and Nirbhay Yadav who fired on her husband as a result of which her husband sustained fire arm injures. Learned P.P. refers paragraph 8 of the case diary and submits that in course of investigation the informant has specifically stated that it was the petitioner who fired on her husband from a distance of twenty feet and on account of that firing her husband sustained fire arm injury. Annexure 2 Photostat copy of the post mortem report of the deceased reveals that the deceased sustained lacerated wound blackening and charring wound surface. So prima facie finding of the doctor belies the further statement of the informant. Considering the aforesaid circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, petitioner (Pappu Yadav) is directed to be released on bail in connection with Gogri P.S. Case no. 17 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like - 2 - amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria subject to the conditions that one of the sureties must be close relative of the petitioner and furthermore, the petitioner shall attend the learned trial court for the period of nine months in person on each and every date and if he fails to comply the above stated direction, the learned court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of petitioner. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)