1 S.B.CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.238/2008 In S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2607/2007 Shanti Devi Joshi v. Shri K.K.Pathak & Ors. Date of Order :: 18 th November, 2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. M.R.Singhvi, for the petitioner. Mr. B.L.Bhati, for the respondents. .... It is stated by counsel for the respondents that the provisional pension as well as the due arrears have already been allowed to the petitioner and as such adequate compliance of the directions given by this Court is made. It is stated by counsel for the petitioner that while making payment of arrears the respondents have deducted a sum of Rs.13,122/- and that is not in accordance with law. Looking to the statement as above, I do not consider it appropriate to proceed against the respondents under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. As such, the contempt petition is dismissed. Rule issued is discharged. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to raise his grievance by submitting a representation to the authority competent regarding the alleged illegal deduction of amount from the due arrears. If petitioner submits such representation, 2 that may be considered and decided by the competent authority expeditiously as far as possible within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation. ( GOVIND MATHUR ),J. kkm/ps.