IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP-T No. 2545 of 2008 Date of Decision : December 7, 2011 Prakash Chand s/o Sh. Sita ram R/o Village Thana Darogan, P.O. Toni Devi, Tehsil and District Hamirpur, H.P. Presently working as Driver in the office of Regional Manager, HRTC, Hamirpur, Tehsil and District Hamirpur, H.P. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Himachal Pradesh through Secretary (Transport), Himachal Pradesh, Shimla, H.P 2. Managing Director, Himachal Road Transport Corporation, Shimla, H.P. 3. Divisional Manager, HRTC, Hamirpur, Tehsil and District Hamirpur, H.P. Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Raju Ram Rahi, Advocate. For the respondents :Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Dy. Advocate General with Mr. Vinod Thakur, Dy. A.G. for respondent No. 1. Mr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. H. S. Rawat, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 and 3. Justice Sanjay Karol, J. (Oral) Petitioner intends filing appeal before the competent authority assailing the impugned order dated 20.8.1999. As such, without Whether reports of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 going into the merits of the matter, as prayed for, liberty is granted to the petitioner to do so within a period of four weeks from today. Upon receipt of the appeal, the competent authority shall decide the same in accordance with law, after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned, within a period of two months. Since petitioner has been pursuing his remedy before this Court, question of limitation shall not be raised before the appropriate authority. Petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. December 7 , 2011 (PK)