IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST JULY 2009 / 10TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 18316 of 2009(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- R.SREEJAYA, AGED 30 YEARS, D/O.GURUDASAN, KARUNNIYA, KOONAMKULAM, BHUTHAKULAM P.O., SOUTH PARAVOOR, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.TRIPTEN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, DIARY DEVELOPMENT AND ANIMAL HUSBANDRY DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. ARBITRATOR, CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DAIRY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, KOLLAM. 4. THE PRESIDENT, POLACHIRA MILK PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. Q 273(D), APCOS, POLACHIRA P.O., KOLLAM. 5. SECRETARY (ACTING), POLACHIRA MILK PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. Q 273(D), APCOS, POLACHIRA P.O., KOLLAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. KC. SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- W.P.(C).No.18316 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the Ist day of July, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner claims that, she was working as Secretary in Polachira Milk Producers Co-operative Society, the President and Secretary of which, are respondents 4 and 5. She says that she had entered on long leave and although she cancelled the leave and reported for duty, she was not admitted for duty. It is stated that keeping her out, by Exts.P3, P4 and P5, she was called upon to remit certain amounts. Pursuant to the demands to made, she raised an arbitration case before the 2nd respondent as ARC.No.209/08, which is pending before the Arbitrator. In this writ petition what she seeks is that she should be reinstated in service. In my view, if monetary claims are the reasons for keeping her out of her employment and those claims are WP(c).No.18316/09 2 the subject matter of the Arbitration case referred to above, if at all the petitioner wants any relief, the proper course is to seek appropriate orders from the Arbitrator. With that liberty, the writ petition is closed. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WP(c).No.18316/09 3