IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2979 of 2010 RAMJI PRASAD YADAV S/O SRI RAJ NARAYAN SINGH R/O VILL DUMRIGARH,P.S.MAJHI,DISTT-CHAPRA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE COMMISSIONER-CUMPRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR, HEALTH SERVICE MAGADH COMMISSIONERI, GAYA. 4. THE CIVIL SURGEON CUM CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER AURANGABAD. 5. THE INCHARGE MEDICAL OFFICER, PRIMARY HEALTH SERVICE null HASPURA, AURANGABAD. with CWJC No.3034 of 2010 SATYENDRA PRASAD SINGH S/O SRI JAGGU PRASAD SINGH R/O VILL SHEKHPURA,P.S.GHOSHI,DISTT- JAHANABAD. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY STATE OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE COMMISSIONER CUM-SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, GAYA. 4. THE CIVIL SURGEON CUM CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER NAWADA. 5. THE INCHARGE MEDICAL OFFICER, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE HISHUA, NAWADA. with CWJC No.3073 of 2010 SHAILENDRA KUMAR S/O SRI DWARIKA MAHATO R/O VILL.- ISWAHAKPUR, P.S.- AKANGAR, DISTT.- NALANDA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE SECRETARY CUM COMMISSIONER, HEALTH SERVICE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR, HEALTH SERVICE, MAGADH PRAMANDAL, GAYA. 4. THE CIVIL SURGEON CUM CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, GAYA. 5. THE INCHARGE MEDICAL OFFICER, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, FATEHPUR, GAYA. with CWJC No.3151 of 2010 SHAMBHU KUMAR S/O SRI SURESH PRASAD R/O VILL.- KURMIBIGHA, P.S.- GHOSHI, DISTT.- JAHANABAD Versus 2 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE COMMISSIONER CUM SECRETARY DEPTT. OF HEALTH, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE CIVIL SURGEON, CUM CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER null NAWADA. 4. THE CIVIL SURGEON CUM CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER null AURANGABAD. 5. THE INCHARGE MEDICAL OFFICER PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, SIRDALA, NAWADA. with CWJC No.3266 of 2010 1. AMBUJ KUMAR VERMA S/O SRI KAILASH PRASAD R/O VILL.- KURMIBIGHA, P.S.- GHOSHI, DISTT.- JEHANABAD Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE SECRETARY CUM COMMISSIONER HEALTH SERVICE, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR HEALTH SERVICE, MAGADH PRAMANDAL, GAYA. 4. THE CIVIL SURGEON CUM CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER JEHANABAD. 5. THE INCHARGE MEDICAL OFFICER ADDITIONAL PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, SANDU PHATEHPUR, ARWAL, JEHANABAD. with CWJC No.3432 of 2010 1. SATENDRA KUMAR VERMA S/O SRI SURESH CHANDRA SINGH R/O VILL.- MURGIA CHAK, P.S.- GHOSI, DISTT.- JAHANABAD. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, STATE OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE COMMISSIONER CUM SECRETARY HEALTH SERVICE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR, HEALTH SERVICE, MAGADH PRAMANDAL, GAYA. 4. THE CIVIL SURGEON CUM CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, JAHANABAD. 5. THE INCHARGE MEDICAL OFFICER, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE ARWAL. with CWJC No.3660 of 2010 ARUN PRASAD S/O SRI RAM CHANDRA MAHATO R/O VILL.- KURMIBIGHA, P.S.- GHOSHI, DISTT.- JAHANABAD Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE COMMISSIONER CUM SECRETARY, DEPTT. OF HEALTH, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3 3. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR, HEALTH SERVICE MAGADH PRAMANDAL, GAYA. 4. THE CIVIL SURGEON CUM CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, JAHANABAD. 5. THE INCHARGE MEDICAL OFFICER, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, KURTHA, ARWAL. With C.W.J.C. No.3414 of 2010 PRAMOD KUMAR SINHA SON OF SRI RAGHUYNATH PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – KURMI BIGHA, P.S. GHOSI, DISTRICT – JEHANABAD. VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE SECRETARY CUM COMMISSIONER, HEALTH SRVICE, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR, HEALTH SERVICE, MAGADH PRAMANDAL, GAYA. 4. THE CIVIL SURGEON CUM CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, GAYA. 5. THE INCHARGE MEDICAL OFFICER, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, GAYA. ----------- 02. 10.12.2010 Petitioners are employees engaged in the year 1986 and onwards whose services came to be terminated by the respondents in the year 2002-2003, in terms of Annexure-7 (in CWJC No.2979/2010), Annexure-4 (in CWJC No.3073/2010), Annexure-3 (in CWJC Nos.3034, 3151, 3266, 3432 and 3660 of 2010 respectively) and Annexure-5 (in CWJC No.3414 of 2010). Petitioners have challenged the said decisions now in the year 2010 on various grounds. Not only the writ applications are stale and belated but earlier applications with similar reliefs have come to decided by various Benches of this Court and directions have been issued from time to time. Since the petitioners have failed to participate in any those proceedings at any point of time, no innovation can be permitted for them by treating these cases in isolation. 4 Even otherwise as things stand today, the last of the order passed by the Bench Division is the case of The State of Bihar and others vs. Sohan Roy and its analogous cases, reported in 2010(2) PLJR, 397. Since in the said Division Bench’s decision only such petitioners have been permitted to go before one man committee, this Court cannot even order that petitioners should approach one man committee because the single Judge has no authority to expand the ambit of the Division Bench. In the totality these writ petitions cannot be entertained and they are dismissed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)