IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 13TH DECEMBER 2011 / 22ND AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 33266 of 2011(G) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- MR.ANIAN KOSHY, AGED 44, S/O.LATE G.KUNJU KOSHY, NELLIVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, IYPALLUR, KIZHEKKETHERUVU P.O., KOTTARAKKARA. BY ADV. SRI.S.SACHITHANANDA PAI RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. THE TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY, KOTTARAKKARA-691001. 2. UNION BANK OF INDIA, CHALAI BAZAR BRANCH, JALAL BUILDING, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER. PIN - 691 001. R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. S. JAMAL R2 BY ADV. SRI. ASP. KURUP, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 33266/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 18-3-2011 IN WPC 7303/2011. P2: COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 22-9-2011 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT. P3: COPY OF THE SALE NOTICE DATED 2-11-2011 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 33266 of 2011 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 13th day of December, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner challenges revenue recovery proceedings initiated by the 2nd respondent through the 1st respondent for recovery of loan amounts due from the petitioner to the 2nd respondent. The petitioner does not dispute the liability to pay or the quantum. The petitioner only seeks three months' time to pay off the amounts. This is opposed by the counsel for the 2nd respondent. 2. Having heard both sides, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to give the petitioner three months' time to pay off the dues. For three months, the sale shall stand adjourned and if the petitioner pays the entire amounts within the said three months, further proceedings shall be dropped. However, if the petitioner commits default in payment within the said three months, it would be open to the respondents to continue proceedings as now initiated without having to issue any fresh notice or the petitioner in that regard. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/