HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAIW AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No,?391 pf 2009 PETmONER: RESPONDENTS: -Versiis- 1. 2. 3. Smt. Preeti Sharma, W/o Shri Pradeep Narayaa Shanna, D/o Raciadhar Shukla, aged about 38 years, R/o C/o Shri Vasudev Siagh Thakur, Tiranga, Kushalpur, Raipur (CG) State of Chhattisgarh^ tlirozigh Secretary, Higher Education Departoaient, D. K. S, Bhawan, Raipiir (CG) Director, State Council of Education Researcti & Tramiag, Chhattisgarh, Raipiir (CG) Prcsident Coiinselmg Committee of State Comicil of Education Research & Traiaiag, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG) Priiicipal, Shri Shankarachaiya Mahavidyalaya of Shri Gaiigajal Education Society, Sector-6, Lalcshmi Nagar, Temple Complex Bhilai (CG) Present: Snit. Meena Shastod, counsel for tlie petitioner, Shxi Suniesh Bajaj, Govt, Advocate for fhe State. SiBgile Beneh: Hosa?ble Shri Dhiyesadra Mishra, J« ORAL ORDER (24-9-2009) 1, The petitioner has llled this petition and prayed for foUowing x'eMefs: "'(1) Tlia.t,' the petitioner most respectfully prayed that fhis Hont^le Court inay kiadly be pleased to direct fhe respondents for to provide admission to fhe petitioiier in the B. Ed. CoUege (respondent No.4) of fhe petitioner. (2) That, the petitioner further prayed that this Hon'ble Cozirt may kindly be pleased to grant fhe suitable '^%^3 conipensaton^ ai2iou.nt witli cost of tiie petition io. lavour of ihe petitioner. (3) Any otlier reiief, which may be deexaed fit aiid proper iji the facts & circuisistances ofthe case along- with cost ofthe petitiou/' 2. Leained coiinsel for fhe petitioner on iastnictions from fhe petitioner szibiiiits fhat the petitioner niay be permitted to withdraw tliis writ petition with liberty to file fresh representation i^isiag all his grievances raised ia tliis petition, which may be fiirther considered axid decided by respondent No,2 ia accordance wifh law, 3. Learaed counsel for tl}e State, on instiTictions from. Shri Hexaaiit Kuiiiar Sao, Lectui'er, 8.C.E.R.T., Raipur, submitted fhat if the petitioner files represeTitation, the saine shall be considered and decided ia acco.rdan.ee with relevant. .rules and regulations appMcab.Ie tbr admisslon iri the B.Ed.-Course. Barye 4. Accordirigly, fhe wiit petition is disniissed as witlidrawn with Mbert^r as prayed for. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge