THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.10161 of 2010 Dated:29.04.2010 Between: Edire Naganna. ….Petitioner And The Govt. of A.P. Rep by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, And others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.10161 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner is a member of Works Committee of Solipur Village, Khila Ghanpur Mandal in Mahabubnagar District. The Works Committee of the Village passed a resolution on 15.11.2009 nominating the petitioner as a works executing member. On 16.04.2010 the third respondent issued proceedings requesting the fourth respondent to give mark out to the sixth respondent with whom an agreement was entered into for the work of “Road Formation Solipur to Kothulakunta Tanda of Ghanpur (M)” pertaining to the PRI Division. This is assailed in the writ petition. Counsel for the petitioner submits that as the work was entrusted to the sixth respondent purportedly as per the guidelines of the Government in G.O.Ms.No.10, dated 10.01.2006, the same is illegal. According to him under G.O.Ms.No.10 the works undertaken in the Gram Panchayat whose estimated cost is below Rs.5,00,000/- should be entrusted to the works executing member nominated by the Works Committee. Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj refutes this. He submits that work was undertaken under Calamity Relief Fund and therefore, the Government Order has no application. This Court has no reason to dissent the submission of the Assistant Government Pleader. Furthermore, even according to the petitioner an agreement was already entered into on 16.04.2010. The grant of writ as prayed would amount to nullifying the agreement entered into by the Panchayat with sixth respondent. It is ordinarily not permissible. Liberty is given to the petitioner to approach the District Collector for any redressal. The Writ Petition with the above observations is dismissed. _______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 29.04.2010 vs