THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.28033 of 2011 ORDER: The relief sought for in this Writ Petition is to declare the action of the second respondent, in trying to dispossess the petitioner from an extent of Ac.1.70 cents of agricultural land in Sy.No.1809/3 of Chennampalli Village, Badvel Mandal, Kadapa District, as illegal and arbitrary. A consequential direction is sought to the second respondent not to dispossess the petitioner from the aforesaid extent without following the procedure established by law. The petitioner, a displaced person in the Somasila Project, claims to have been issued a house site patta by the competent authority. It is his case that an extent of Ac.1.70 cents of agricultural land, in Sy.No.1809/3 of Chennampalli Village, Badvel Mandal, Kadapa District, was granted in the year 1999 itself; without either cancelling the assignment granted in his favour, or without resuming the land, the third respondent (Tahsildar, Badvel Mandal, Kadapa District) had, subsequently, granted house site pattas to others in respect of the very same land; and, since the respondents were seeking to dispossess him, he had no other alternative except to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court. When the matter was listed on 14.10.2011, Learned Government Pleader for Revenue (Assignment) sought time to obtain instructions. Today the Learned Government Pleader, on instructions, would submit that the petitioner was indeed assigned an extent of Ac.1.70 cents of agricultural land in the year 1999 itself; the said assignment still continues to remain in force; by oversight, the third respondent had granted house site pattas for the very same land; action would now be taken to cancel the house site pattas granted to others subsequently; and the respondents, as at present, had no intention either to interfere with the petitioner’s possession over the land in question or to prevent him from cultivating the said land. In view of the submissions made by the Learned Government Pleader for Revenue (Assignment), and in as much as the respondents do not, for the present, contemplate any action being taken to dispossess the petitioner from the land in question, the cause in the Writ Petition does not necessitate further adjudication. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, closed. However, in the circumstances, without costs. RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J Date:17.10.2011 usd