IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14334 of 2007 1. Md. Bashir, son of Abdul Ghani. 2. Jahangir Alam, son of late Abdul Wadood. 3. Tajbun Nisa, daughter of late Md. Nazir. 4. Bibi Sakina, wife of late Md. Nazir. 5. Md. Kalam. 6. Md. Salam. 7. Md. Nasir. Sons of late md. Shakoor. All resident of village- Basatpur, P.O.- Barkagaon, Anchal- Kanti, P.S. Karja, District- Muzaffarpur. ..... Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Director, Consolidation, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Joint Director, Consolidation, Muzaffarpur. 4. The Deputy Director, Consolidation, Muzaffarpur. 5. The Collector, Muzaffarpur. 6. The Circle Officer, Kanti, District- Muzaffarpur. 7. Md. Mansoor Shah 8. Reyazuddin Shah 9. Md. Kalam 10.Md. Shahid Sons of late Md. Habib Shah 11.Shahnaz Khatoon 12. Zobaida Khatoon Daughters of late Md. Habib Shah. Respondent no.7 to 12 resident of village- Basatpur, Anchal- Kanti, P.S. Karja, District- Muzaffarpur. ...... Respondents. ----------- 02- 2.3.2009 Heard Mr. Arun Kumar for the petitioners, and Mr. Bindeshwar Prasad Singh, learned assistant counsel to Standing Counsel No.12. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 14.6.2007 (Annexure-8), passed by the learned Joint Director of 2 Consolidation, Muzaffarpur, in Revision Case No.11 of 2006 (Md. Mansoor Shah and others Vs. Md. Basir and others), in purported exercise of powers under Section-35 of the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956. 2. The proceedings are with respect to Plot no.1125, covering an area of 31 decimals, situate in Village- Basantpur, Thana no.110, P.S. & Anchal- Kanti, District- Muzaffarpur. It has been held in the impugned order that the applicants before him (respondent nos.7 to 12 herein) are decedants of Dayam Sah, the Khatiyani Raiyat. It is further stated therein that they are in possession of the lands in question. Learned counsel for the petitioners has raised issues which are within the realm of facts and it is difficult to entertain them in view of the scope of writ jurisdiction. 3. The writ petition is dismissed. (S K Katriar, J.) S.K.Pathak/