1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 38. CA/9073/2008 In FAST/15316/2008 WITH CA/9074/2008 In FAST/15316/2008 WITH CA/9075/2008 In FAST/15316/2008 WITH CA/9076/2008 In FAST/15304/2008 WITH CA/9077/2008 In FAST/15304/2008 WITH CA/9078/2008 In FAST/15304/2008 WITH CA/9079/2008 2 In FAST/15310/2008 WITH CA/9080/2008 In FAST/15310/2008 WITH CA/9081/2008 In FAST/15310/2008 WITH CA/9082/2008 In FAST/15298/2008 WITH CA/9083/2008 In FAST/15298/2008 WITH CA/9084/2008 In FAST/15298/2008 WITH CA/9085/2008 In FAST/15214/2008 3 WITH CA/9086/2008 In FAST/15214/2008 WITH CA/9087/2008 In FAST/15214/2008 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 3 rd July, 2009. 1) Heard Mr.Surwase, learned Counsel appearing for the acquiring body. The acquiring body has come into play by virtue of notification of 1998 and it has responsibility to meet past and future claims of the various claimants, whose properties are acquired for the projects. Consequently, any order that is passed is adversely affecting interest of the appellant. The appellant is original respondent no.2 in the proceedings. Consequently, leave to file appeal granted in all these appeals. 2) Heard Mr.Surawase on the point of delay. In each of the appeals, there is delay of 203 days in seeking to file 4 the appeals, challenging the order of enhancement passed in different Land References by a common order dated 16.10.2007. The appellant feels that the refusal to condone the delay will be resulting in potentiality of defusing their claims and contentions. I quite see that the rights of the appellant/acquiring body should not be foreclosed. Consequently, the delay in each of these matters is condoned. Respective applications allowed as above. 3) Upon the appellant acquiring body depositing entire amount covered under the Award, subject of challenge, dated 16.10.2007 within twelve weeks before the learned Reference Court, i.e. CJSD, Nilanga, the order under challenge is stayed. Respective Civil Applications to that extent allowed. 4) Notice to the respective respondents. 5) Learned AGP waives notice on behalf of State. ( K.U.CHANDIWAL ) JUDGE bdv/ca9073.08