IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40049 of 2009 RAMDEO YADAV SON OF LATE BASUDEO YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 25-11-2009 Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. Let it be kept on record. Heard both the parties. The petitioner seeks bail in a case institution under section 379, 364,307 and other allied sections of the Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that before the present occurrence took place the petitioner’s niece, Sabnam Kumari had been kidnapped by the sons of the informant and sent to jail and thereafter this case has been instituted, let the above named petitioner who is in custody since 24.07.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- ( Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Sonbarsa Raj P.S. Case No. 26 of 2009 on the conditions : (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit - 2 - that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. ( Anjana Prakash, J ) BTiwary/