IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11646 of 2011 Mamata Kumari W/O Sri Birendra Kumar Singh , D/O Sri Rabindra Prasad Singh R/O Village+P.O.-Chhota Sasaram, P.S. Udwantnagar & O.P.-Gajrajganj, Distt.-Bhojpur (Ara) Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Principal Secretary Human Resources Development Department Govt. Of Bihar Patna 3. The District Collector Bhojpur, Ara 4. The District Superintendent Of Education Bhojpur, Ara 5. The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Bhojpur, Ara 6. The Block Development Officer Udwantnagar Bhojpur, Ara 7. The Block Education Officer Udwant Nagar Bhojpur, Ara 8. The Panchayat Secretary Gram Panchayat Kansath Block Udwantnagar, Bhojpur, Ara 9. The Mukhiya Panchayat Karisath Block Udwantnagar, Bhojpur, Ara 10. The Member District Teacher Appellate Tribunal Bhojpur, Ara 11. Priti Tiwary D/O Sri Kedarnath Tiwary R/O Village Bishunpura, Udwantnagar, O.P.Gajrajganj, Distt.-Bhojpur (Ara) ---------------------------------- For the petitioner: Mr. Ashwani Kumar Tewary, Advocate For the State: Mr. Lalit Kishore, AAG-I ---------------------------------- 2. 30.8.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that the application filed on 30.3.2009 by the petitioner before the District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Bhojpur (Ara) has not been disposed of as yet. 2 From a perusal of the said so called application (Annexure-6 to the writ petition) it appears that the same is a letter addressed by the petitioner to the In-charge of the Appellate Authority making a grievance against the attempt being made by the concerned Karisath Gram Panchayat for making appointment in an illegal manner. The same cannot be considered as a proper application/appeal before a quasi judicial authority. The function of the District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority is to look into any complaint with regard to any appointment made by the Gram Panchayats, etc. and not to make enquiries into an ongoing process which appears to be the purport of the letter written by the petitioner before the Appellate Authority on 30.3.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the meantime appointment process has been completed but the petitioner has not filed any other application for the same. The writ application is accordingly disposed of with a direction that in case the petitioner 3 files a proper application impleading the necessary parties before the District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Bhojpur (Ara), then the same shall be considered and disposed of by the Appellate Authority in accordance with law considering the fact that the petitioner had been under the impression that her letter dated 30.3.2009 was a proper application before the Appellate Authority. S.Pandey ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.)