1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.3869/2010 Jaikam Vs. State Date of order : 21/5/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Anil Kumar for the petitioner. Shri Amit Punia, P.P. for the State. ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the accused-petitioner was arrested in the present case on 19.2.2010 for the alleged offence under Section 332, 353 and 307 of IPC, whereas the four injured in the present case have sustained only simple injuries. He has already been enlarged on bail in the case under Section 379 by Metropolitan Magistrate Dwarka Courts, New Delhi. Challan has already been filed. Investigation is complete and there is no other case pending against the petitioner, except these cases. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of this case but taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on 2 bail. In the result, this bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Jaikam S/o Samsu shall be released on bail in F.I.R. No.26/2010, P.S. Jurhera, Distt. Bharatpur on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till conclusion of the trial. However, in case the petitioners are found indulged in similar offence at any point of time, the prosecution would be at liberty to apply for cancellation of their bail before the Court of Sessions itself and the bail would be liable to be cancelled on this ground alone. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/