45/23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1007 /2009 % MICROSOFT CORPORATION & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through : Ms. Safia Said, Advocate. versus MR. GOPINATARANJAN &ANR ..... Defend en ts Through : Mr. N.L. Ganapathi, Advocate, for Defendant No.2 with Mr. Purushottama Reddy, Authorised Representative of Defendant No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICES. RA VINDRA BHAT ORDER 11.08.2009 I.A. No. 10052/2009 (Under Order 23 Rule 3) in CS(OS) 1007/2009 By a joint application Under Order 23 Rule 3, the parties request the Court to record a settlement and impede a consent decree. The terms of the compromise are contained in paras 2(a) to 2G); the application is supported by affidavits of the plaintiffs' Constituted Attorney and Financial Controller of second defendant, who was duly authorized for this purpose by the Board Resolution of 11.07.2009. It is stated by defendants' counsel that the said deponent, Mr. Purushottama Reddy is also present in Court. For the reasons mentioned in the joint application and having considered the submissions, the Court is of the opinion that interest ·of justice would be sub-served if the claim is acceded to; I.A. No. 10052/2009 is accordingly allowed. CS(OS) 1007/2009 Learned counsel for the plaintiffs submits that the claim as against Defendant Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified I ,.., _, No. I would not be pressed; it is accordingly deemed abandoned and the suit is dismissed against the said defendants. In view of the order made in I.A. No. 10052/2009, the suit is decreed in terms of paras 2(a) to 2G) of the application; let a decree be drawn, subject to the plaintiffs depositing differential Court Fees. No costs. AUGUST 'ajk' 11,2009 S. RA VINDRA BHAT,J ii