IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 14TH AUGUST 2008 / 23RD SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 21764 of 2008(N) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ RAY CONSTRUCTIONS LTD., ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS, HEAD OFFICE,G-30,SUYOG,LAL BAHADUR SASTRI MARG,VIKROLI (WEST) MUMBAI REPRESENTED BY ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MR.K.R.VIJAYA KUMAR,AGED 57 YEARS,S/O.LATE K.P.RAMAKRISHNA PANICKER,CHAITRA APARTMENTS, 1ST FLOOR, CHANGAMPUZHA SAMADHI ROAD, NEAR GANAPATHI TEMPLE WEST NEDA, EDAPPALLY, KOCHI - 682 024. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE PALLATTUKARAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ELECTRICAL MAJOR DIVISION, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,VYTTILA,KOCHI 19. 2. THE SECRETARY (LAW) THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDHUTHI BHAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 3. ASSISTANT ENGINEER ELECTRICAL SECTION, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYTTILA. 4. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER ANTI POWER THEFT SQUAD, KERALA STAE ELECTRICITY BOARD, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B FOR R1 TO 4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- W.P.C. NO. 21764 OF 2008 N -------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th August, 2008 JUDGMENT This Writ Petition is filed against Exts.P14 and P15. Ext.P14 is a mahazar prepared resulting in Ext.P15. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Electricity Board. There is no dispute that Ext.P15 can only be treated as a provisional Invoice under Section 126 of the Electricity (Amendment) Act, 2007. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter has been heard. According to the learned standing counsel, the matter is posted for hearing. Whichever it is, unless a decision is taken and final order is passed, I feel that the interim order passed by this Court should continue. In such circumstances, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing that unless a final decision is taken, there will not be any disconnection pursuant to Ext.P15. Sd/= K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE kbk. //True copy// PS to Judge