HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR w.P. No. 169/2003 PETITIONER Sukhu Ram Sahu, aged about 68 years, son of Latc Shxi Hinchha Ram, residing near Mata Talao, Nagri, Disuict Dhamtari (C,G.) Versus RESPONDENTS 1 State of Chhatt‘isgarh through the Secretaly, Ministzy of Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribc, Backward Class and Minority Community Developnmnt Dcpaxtment, Mantralaya, Raipuir (C. G.) 2 The Collector, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) Scheduled Tn'be Development, ‘ Deptt. Collectorate, Dhamtari (C.G.) The Block Education O$cer, Tn'bal Block, Nagn', Distt. Dhamtari C,G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: x 3. The Distu'ct Organiser, Shri C.R. Sahu, Counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (19.09.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for Withdrawal of the petition on the ground that the petition has become innuctuous. This is not opposed by the State. The prayer is allowed. as withdrawn, being e The petition is dismissed, inh‘uctuous. Sdl- unil Kumar Sinha Judge x S