HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPU DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON’BLE SHRI JAGDISH BHALLA, A—g. CJ. & HON’BLE SHRI SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. M.C.C. N0. 216 of 2007 Applicant : Anil Agrawal S/o Late Shri Sukh Petitioner Sagar Prasad Agrawal, aged about 39 years, R/o Khokpara, Purani Basti, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) Versus ¢ Non-applicants 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Thr9ugh : Respondents: Secretary, Tourism Department. DKS Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Secretary. General Administration Deptt. D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Director. Public Relations Deptt. Chhota Park Raipur (C.G.) 4. Chh‘attisgarh Tourism Board Through Managing Director, Paryatan Bhavan, Indira Gandhi Marg, Raipur (C.G.) Application foLpermission to withdrawal of Surety Money Present : Shri J.K. Shastri, counsel for the petitioner. r ORAL ORDER > (Passed on 26m July, 2007) \ l The following oral order of the Court was passed by Hon’ble Jagdish Bhalla, Ag. C.J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the money deposited at the time of tiling‘of W.P. [PIL] No. 3341/2007 be returned because there was no profit to the petitioner. This is the first time this Court is heard that there are protits in the Public Interest Litigation petitions to the petitioners. Since the petitioner could not get any prom, therefore, he wants money deposited be returned to him. Further, R -Q’ counsel for the petitioner could not show any provision under which he can withdraw the amount deposited. Accordingly, no interference is warranted in this application. After this order was dictated, counsel for the petitioner submitted that in fact he wanted to say that the money deposited by the petitioner has not been forfeited. He could not show any provision whether the money has to be forfeited or released in favour of the iHr A / ‘ " petitioner. 'n l the M.C.C. is rejected. Sd/‘ ‘i — Sci/d Agumefwstice Satlsh .Eggmhotrl e