IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8064 of 2008 GEETA KUMARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 07.08.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. It is unfortunate that the petitioner had to come to this Court seeking directions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for disposal of the appeal preferred by her against the order dated 7.2.2008 removing her from the post of Anganwari Sevika. An appeal was preferred well within limitation on 15.2.2008 and is still pending. In the meantime the respondents have initiated fresh process on 30.4.2008 for new appointment. What the respondents essentially seek to do is to frustrate the appeal by their own inaction by subsequent action. This Court would not allow them to do so. Let the memorandum of appeal preferred by the petitioner and pending before the respondent no. 3 be disposed within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. Till disposal of the appeal though the respondents may continue with the fresh selection process, they shall not make any fresh appointment thereupon when the matter shall abide by the final decision in the appeal. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)