IN TEIE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT JABALPUR W.P.No.33^f2000. WRITPETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA. PETITIONERS ^s^^y "^- ~' ' ' ...-'" :1. 2. ^T^ Jayshatikar Upadhayay aged 34 years, S/o Shri V.N. Upadhayay R/o Village Sama (NouK) Post- Raghunafh Nagar, Distt.SargujaM.P. Pahluram Kushwaha aged 24 years, S/o Dasharam, R/o ViBage Kutrahi Post- Wardraf Nagar, Distt Sarguja M.P. Nandld Kushwaha aged 25 years, S/o Shri Gulabram R/o ViUage Pandari, Post-Wardraf Nagar, Distt. Saiguja M.P. Duryodhan Prasad Patel aged 34 years, S/o Shri Badri Prasad Vfflage Parasdiha Post-Bartikal Dtett Saiguja M.P. Naveen Prasad Kesri aged 24 years S/o Shri Ramnalfa, R/o Vjlhge Wardarf Nagar, Distt. Sarguja M.P. Radhyeshyam Kesri aged 28 years S/o Thakur Prasad R/o Village & Post- Balangi Distt. Sarguja M.P. Sukhdeo Kushwaha aged 29 years, S/o Shri Jayshriram R/o ViBage Kutr^u Post- Wadraf Nagar Distt. Sarguja M.P. VERSUS :4. The State of M.P. through the Secretaiy of Panchayat & Rural Development Department Ministry Bhopal, Vallabh Bhawan Bhopal M.P. The Distdct Collector, fhe Collector's Ofi&ce Amhikapur, Distt. Sarguja M.P. The Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Wadraf Nagar, Distt. Sarguja M.P. The Sthayee Shiksha Saniiti, through its Presidenl, Wadaraf Nagar Janpad Pancfcyat OfiSce, Wadraf Nagar Distt. SarguJa M.P. 'W >' The leamed Lokayukta, Lokayukta Sangathan, ZJla Satarkta Sanriti Kaiyalaya, A-/30 Priyadarshni Nagar Bilaspur M.P. iinr XI-HC-78 'TPTOT^'n^ <3wT 'r«i<4irt«,tPTr1'<-i<i<?,fclowyx ^Al 3TT^?T q?<F (^c|i^6l«£;) ^l2000 W^TcpTf^Fltcp ?ran3n^?Ta?Hra? ^. ^cn^R^rficrsn^^T 12-5-2005 On a mentlon being ma'dej Mr. SushiS Dubey,counse! Mr. Akhi! Agrawai, Pane! and 2. Heard both the counsel. The petitioners have pre] that the seiection iist.dated 29 and a fresh seiection may.be o <pi^To<nvi +iMoT^'fel<l ^RI^I^ ^3Tf^T3H^5T the rnatter is taken up for hearing. for the petitioners. : Lawyer for the State/respondents No,l ferred this writ petition with the reliefs -7-1998 (Annexure.P-l) may.be-canceiied rdered, and the inter-views and se!ection dated 23CT9-°i998 of 22 extra c^ndidates and 12 rebtive candidates rnay be cance!!ed. |hat they appeared before the Interviev^ loard conducted by responde^it No.4 for the post of Shiksha Karmi Ciass-III/however, certain irr^guiarities were committed by respondent No.4 in" the selection, therefor|e, that selection has chailenged on the ground of irreguiaritieSo Learned counsel.for the p.etitioners submits that the petitioners iTiay be aiiowed to :niake a repr|esentation- to respondent No.2, to which iearned counsel for the StateJ He further submits that representation (Annexure Pm6 far those representations have| frespondents No.t & 2 has no objection. the petitioners had already %. P"9) twlce to respondent Ho2, but so Inot decided. XI-HC-78 vdT^i ^iqirt^, iprrl^^K?, Rom^ c^.' TTPTc5Ta?1[TT^ ^2000 3TT^?T tra^ (^clijdtg) ^^Tc^f^it^ 'fRHW^^T^HR? \>^ Somc ^^ ¥ ?^<TT^R^Tftd 3n^5T -^.-1 Having heard ieamed cou^i the facts and circumstances ofl make a fresh representation t^ today raising ali their grievanc^s Annexures P-6 & P-9, in turn, r4 representation within one rnont(| the after considering t^\ accordahce with law. With the direction afore^xid Consequentiy, I.A.No.364,f Parties are entitied for c4 <PI<4fc)<nT1 +1MC)T;^'(^l<9 ^^-Cl^ ^3:Ff^T3TT^$T ise! for -the parties and having regard to |the case, the petitioners are aibwed to ^ respondent No,2 within 10 days from aiong with a copy of this petition and [spondent«,No.2isdirected to dedde the ^ frorri the date o.f receipt of a copy of e poi'nts raised' by. the petitioners, in the petition stands dlsposed of. f2001 als-o stands disposed of. trtified copy of this order. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge ^ '^