1 S.B.Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.2615/2007 (Bhagwati Lal vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : July 17, 2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr. Sandeep Mehta, for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, P.P. for the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State and the police investigation diary. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has nothing to do with the vehicle, which alleged to have transported the contraband poppy straw. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application and submits that the petitioner purchased the vehicle bearing No.RJ- 27-1C-6979, which was transporting a huge quantity of contraband poppy straw i.e. weighing 90 Kgs. and the petitioner has purchased the said vehicle by an agreement dt. 27.12.2006 and thus the petitioner is the owner of the vehicle. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that there is an ample evidence directly connecting the petitioner with the commission of crime including the information furnished under section 27 of the 2 Indian Evidence Act by the accused arrested by the police. Since prima facie there is an ample evidence directly connecting the petitioner with the commission of the offence, in my view, no case for grant of anticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C. is made out. The bail application filed by the petitioner under section 438 Cr.P.C. is, therefore, dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-