1 S/3 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4667/2009. Mahendra Singh Vs. Ravo Virendra Singh Date of Order :: 17th September 2009. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI None present for the petitioner. ... BY THE COURT: This writ petition came up for consideration yesterday, i.e., 16.09.2009 but nobody appeared for the petitioner. After perusing the record, the matter was placed for dictation of order today. Today also, nobody is present for the petitioner. It is noticed from the record that nobody was present in this matter before the Court on 15.05.2009 and 25.05.2009. With regular defaults in attendance, it is apparent that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting this writ petition. Even otherwise, the writ petition remains totally bereft of substance and there appears no reason to keep the same pending. From the perusal of the record, it is noticed that the petitioner, non-applicant in a petition moved under the Rajasthan Relief of Agricultural Indebtedness Act, 1957, proceeded to move an application seeking summoning of record that was rejected by the Trial Court on 13.11.2007 and as the mater was already fixed for evidence and witnesses were present, the counsel appearing for the petitioner was 2 called upon to cross-examine the witnesses while declining the request for adjournment. It appears from the observations as made in the impugned order dated 13.11.2007 that the counsel appearing for the present petitioner refused to cooperate with the Court; and in the circumstances, right of cross-examination was closed by the Debt Relief Court. The revision petition as filed against the order dated 13.11.2007 was rejected by the Additional District Judge, Raisinghnagar on 08.08.2008 finding no jurisdictional error. This Court is unable to find any reason to consider any interference in this matter. Having regard to the observations as made in the order dated 13.11.2007, the Debt Relief Court cannot be faulted in closing the right of cross-examination. The learned Additional District Judge has also rightly rejected the baseless revision petition. The writ petition stands rejected. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. //Mohan//