WGH COURT OF CHHATTISG‘ARH AT BILA$PUR mViSiON BENCH HON’BLE SHR! RAJEEV GUPTA. C.J. & HON’BLE SHRE SUNEL KUMAR SSNHA, J. WP. No.2273l2Gi36 1 Central Coal Mines Workers, Centra! Cooperative Steres Maryadit, Chirmiri A cooperative Sadety registered under the provisions of the MP. (C.G.) Ceoperative Societies Act, 1930 vide registration no. DRBSP 12 1963 P.O. Chirmiri District Korea (0.6.) through Manager Abdul $hamshad Khan, Aged about 5O years S/o Shri Abdul Rajjak Khan. B. Seam Coliiery Karmchari Prathmik Upbhokta Sahkari Bhandar Maryadit B. Seam Coiiiery, Manendragarh (Hasdeo area) Registration No. 1719 dated 15.9.1989 Viiiage e Post West J.K.D. Khongapani district Korea (C.G.) thrcugh Manager/Secretary Vijay Narayan Pathak, Aged about , 42 years, Slo Late Shri Rambachan ‘ Pathak. Rio Welfare Colony, Village & Post Khongapani (West J.K.D.) District Korea (C.G.) 497447 . Chirmiri Colliery Cooperative Stores Chirmiri vide registration No.1250, Post Chirmiri Babu Line Bistrict Korea (C.G.;l through Manager Shri GS. Viswas, Aged about 55 years, S/o Late Shri BK. Viswas. Rio Village & Post Chirmiri, Babu Line District Korea (C.G.) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Threugh theSecretary gapartment of Food & Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection, D.K.S. Bhawa‘n. Mantraiaya, Raipur {Chhattisgarh) 2. The Coiiector. District Korea, i3ETiTi0NERS N) RESPONDENT$ (Chhattisgarh) 3. Sub Division Officer (Revenue) Manenda’agarh, District Kerea (Chhattisgarh) ?ETiTiON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF 1‘HE CONSTITUTION O? !NDEA Present: Shri Mateen Siddique, Counsel for the petitioners. Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Additianai Advocate Genera for the State. (14‘h%§3h;E2§es) F\ The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shrl Kishore Bhaduri, learned Additional Advocate General submits that as all the issues raised in this writ petition have already been finaily decided vide order dated 09.03.2007, passed i in WP‘ No.5265/2006 and other connected petition: now nothing survives for decision in this writ petition. 2) Shrl Matin Siddique, learned counsel for the 1 petitioners could not dispute the above factual situation now prevailing in the case. 3) The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. 4) Consequently. the interim order dated 03.05.2006 stands vacated automatically. Sdl— Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Sdl— Chief Justice Fatima l