Qatwk 13 THE‘HIGE comer OE JUmcgmREugg m$swa (c,_§,_1;. WRIT pmxmm ($3) No. 551$§M4200$ PETITroma‘R Nana Kgmar shgma ageél abgt 64 years y son of Shri Fekmlal Shamai‘i Retired Ptincipal .HR/o Village Pandhi Tahsil $egpat District Bilaslmr ( (c.G.); maspoN DENTS‘“ 11" state o£ mhattisgarh Thmugh: The _ Secretary , Ealcation Dgpartment .‘i D.K '3‘. Bha-vxl w Raipur ( c. G. )g $ 2. The #Acwuntmt Gmeral of the State Emcation Departma‘tt QfEice simated at Pagaria %mp1ex Panéary Raipur (am)? HEGH‘ COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT RH .ASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 6273 0f2OCI9 FETITKGNER : Nanci Kunaar Sharma. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : S‘iaie of'Chhattisgarh & Another. BLRIT PE'ITI‘EON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA S3: Howme Shri Satish K. AgnihOtri. J. :; 1 Present: Shri RKJE'iwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri AV. Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent N0. 1. / Shri R.Praéhah, Advocate for the respondent No. 2. ORDEK GRAL (Passed on 27‘ day of January, 201 1) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the ease, being payment of retirai benefits matter, may be referred to the pension committee. 2. This Court? in the matter ofWI‘. No. 4642/2004 (Bay‘nath Mancial v. The State of Chimttmgarh div Others) and other connected mattersa directed the Corrmlittee to consider the matter of retirai dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Kqia Baz' Chandra/tar v. State Government and emery) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhan'isgam ct Others v. .Bazj'nath Mandal and another). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31.81 of January, 2008 passed in WP. No. 4642/2004 Bani/Jail? 2 M‘ama’ai (supra) as submitted by learned countel appearing for the pariies. This petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms Le. the office of ihe Aévocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, Within a period of 15 (iays fi’om the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthe petition from the petitioner and this order. Thereaiter, the Committee shalt issue notice to the petitioner and the officere concerned, within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shat} consider and pass order, in accordance with law, alter affording proper opponunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner amt the officers concerned may file additional documents, if necessary. Tiie entire exercise, iiicituiing payment ofretirai dues, ii‘any, to the petitioner be completed within a period ofsix weeks from the (fate ofreceipt of a copy ot‘this order. The petitioner shat} suppiy extra copy of the petition t0 the teamed counsei appearing for the respondents for forwaroing the same to the Committee. ‘ , ' r ‘Sd/- r satishK. Agriiimri e ~ Judge i: . fut i it. \r ‘