MP 1 APPP588_11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.588 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3265 OF 2010 Tukaram Vitthal Shelke ... Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr. Avinash Kamkhekar, Advocate for the Applicant. Smt. P. P. Shinde, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM : J. H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 08TH NOVEMBER 2011 P. C. : While granting bail to the present applicant and two other accused by order dated 26.08.2010, this Court held that the attendance of the applicant at the Police Station was necessary. Though the offence was registered at Mandrup Police Station, District-Satara, the applicant was required to attend Yerwada Police Station once in a month on his own request as he was residing at Pune. Now he seeks relaxation of the condition of attending police station on the ground that he is already reinstated in service. The learned Counsel for the applicant contends that in respect of another accused namely Popat Kapse, the condition has been relaxed. 2. Admittedly, the applicant still resides at Pune. No inconvenience is caused to him if he is required to attend the police station once in a month. From the police papers it appears that the applicant was the person who had received the money for another accused Sanjay Kumar Pathak. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances, I do not see any valid reason to relax the condition of attendance. MP 2 APPP588_11 3. Application stands rejected. (J. H. BHATIA, J)