HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23743 of 2011 Date:09.09.2011 Between: M.Koti Reddy ..... Petitioner AND The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Reptd by its Commissioner, Hyderabad. .....Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri P.Basavaiah For Sri K.Vasudeva Reddy Counsel for the Respondent: Dr.Y.Padmavathi, Standing Counsel for GHMC The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent in seeking to demolish shop bearing No.C1 (Cellar), Padala Complex (MCK No.24-352) in house bearing No.352/MIG, situated at KPHB Colony, Kukatpally Village, Balanagar Mandal, Kukatpally Municipality, Ranga Reddy District, as illegal and arbitrary. When this case came up on earlier occasions, learned counsel for the petitioner has taken adjournments for filing an affidavit of the petitioner for undertaking to vacate the premises in dispute for eventual demolition, if he is permitted to remain in possession for two months. Accordingly, the petitioner has filed an affidavit sworn to on 08.09.2011, wherein he has undertaken in para 3 as under: - “I humbly submit that, I express my willingness to vacate the shop bearing No.C1 (Cellar), Padala Complex (MCK No.24-352) in house bearing No.352/MIG, situated at KPHB Colony, Kukatpally Village, Balanagar Mandal, Kukatpally Municipality, Ranga Reddy District, within 2 months, so as to enable the authorities of the respondent to demolish the structure.” Dr.Y.Padmavathi, learned Standing Counsel for the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, appearing for the respondent, stated that the Corporation will have no objection to permit the petitioner to remain in possession only for a period of two months as undertaken by the petitioner. Having regard to the above, the affidavit of the petitioner is placed on record and the Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction to the petitioner to handover vacant possession of the shop bearing No.C1 (Cellar) of Padala Complex (MCK No.24-352) to the respondent for demolition on the expiry of two months period from today. If the petitioner fails to handover the premises as undertaken by him, the respondent shall be free to demolish the structure without any further notice to the petitioner, apart from initiating appropriate proceedings for violation of the undertaking given by the petitioner. Subject to the above direction and observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, W.P.M.P.No.29105 of 2011 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. __________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 09th September, 2011 Note: Issue CC in three days. B/o DR