1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3930 OF 2008 Shri Nivaratti Jivaba Khade deceased by L.R. 1) Smt.Sunanda N. Khade & Ors. ..Petitioners. V/s. Smt.Akkatai H. Powar. ..Respondent. Mr.M.R.Suryawanshi for petitioners. Mr.N.J.Patil for Respondent. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : JANUARY 7, 2009. DATE : JANUARY 7, 2009. DATE : JANUARY 7, 2009. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. No infirmity can be found with the view taken by the Court below that the objection regarding attachment of pension is ill-advised. In that, the Apex Court in the case of Union of India V/s. Jyoti Union of India V/s. Jyoti Union of India V/s. Jyoti Chit Fund and Finance and ors.(AIR 1976 SC 1163), Chit Fund and Finance and ors.(AIR 1976 SC 1163), Chit Fund and Finance and ors.(AIR 1976 SC 1163), in paragraph-11, has made it clear that attachment is possible and lawful only after such amount is received by the employee. The order of attachment in question purports to attach the amount which has come in the bank account of the Petitioner and/or her predecessor. 2 3. Thus understood, there is no infirmity in the view taken by the Court below. Rejected. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J)