AB 3805/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN Heard Mr. T.H. Hazarika, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B.S. Sinha, learned Addl. P.P., Assam who has produced the C.D. Considering the materials available in the C.D. and the contents of the FIR as w ell as the stage of investigation, I do not think that the present is a fit case for granting pre-arrest bail to the petitioner No.1. Accordingly the prayer for pre-arrest bail of the petitioner No. 1 stands rejected. However, considering the materials in the C.D., I am of the considered opinion t hat the petitioner No. 2 who is the father -in-law of the complainant, is entitl ed to bail Accordingly, the interim bail granted to the petitioner No. 2 on 23.11.2011 is h ereby made absolute. Bail petition stands disposed of.