IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 22ND MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 1110 of 2009(F) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- CHELLAPPAN AGED 48 YEARS, S/O.RAMAN, PUNNALAM, ADIMALI, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.UNNIKRISHNAN (KOLLAM) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. ADIMALI GRAMA PANCHAYATH,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS, SECRETARIATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. K.M.SALIM, KULATHAYIL VEEDU AAYIRAM ACRE, ADIMALI, IDUKKI DT. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.V. MANOJ KUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 1110 of 2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 11th February, 2009. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is seeking a relief, which has been consistently negatived by this Court in Ext. P1 judgment, by the Tribunal for local Self Government Institutions in Ext. P2 order and by the Government in Ext. P7 order. The contention now raised is that in view of Ext. P8 letter from the Panchayat, the Government should be directed to re-consider the matter. I am of opinion that even the Panchayat cannot now overlook the judgment of this Court and the order of the Tribunal as well as the order of the Government in so far as the very same relief which the petitioner seeks has been negatived on merits. Both the Government and the Tribunal found that in view of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, the petitioner cannot be allowed to continue the lease of the shop room in question in so far as the right for lease of the same has to be auctioned. In the above circumstances, I do not find any merit in the writ petition and accordingly the same is dismissed. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.