IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 22ND SEPTEMBER 2011 / 31ST BHADRA 1933 WP(Crl.).No. 405 of 2011(S) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- RAJAMMA, W/O.LATE GOPALAKRISHNAN, BANGLAVIL, VARAVILA, VARAVILA P.O., CLAPPANA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM - 690 001. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, OACHIRA - 690 526. 4. RAMACHANDRAN, EXTEEM SECURITY SERVICE, NAGARBHAVI II STAGE, BDA COMPLEX, BANGALORE-72. BY G.P.SRI.P.K.BABU FOR R1 TO R3 ADV. SRI.BIJU BALAKRISHNAN FOR R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/09/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(Crl.).No. 405 of 2011(S) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 10.6.2010. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT DATED 26.6.2011. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT DATED NIL. TKS // TRUE COPY // P.S. TO JUDGE THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN & C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ. ---------------------------------------- W.P.(Crl.)No.405 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. From the pleadings, we find that Ext.P1 was made by the petitioner's son. Going by the endorsement in Kannada at the foot of Ext.P1, it appears that there is a complaint pending with Talgatpura Police Station, Bangalore with No.318/2010. 2. The learned Government Pleader states, on instructions, that on enquiry by the Kerala Police the said case is stated to be pending investigation. We close this writ petition leaving the petitioner and her son Sri.Mahesh Kumar with liberty to move the Talgatpura Police or any superior officer having jurisdiction over that station or even before the jurisdictional Magistrate in terms of the directions in Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P. (2008 (1) KLT 724 (SC)) so that there could be a meaningful and expeditious investigation, if there is any WP(Crl.).No.405/2011 2 bottle neck seen. We, otherwise, do not express anything on the merits. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN Judge Sd/- C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge TKS