s ^- ^A ';4 '•{ •*A:3> .ffiiK 9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTCSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETCTCON (5} NO.^l.^'f? OF 2011 PETITIONER .> ^e^^ 7...--':^\y ..••••'^^\..N-'" "<<^> ^•'"A^y ,'.^" -.^": ^^ ..'-^" ?y^,..-""" .^'^"" Smt. Chandravati Kareem W/o. Keneth Kirvin Kareem, aged about 59 years, Head Master Working as 6ovt. Girls Middle Schoot Katghora, Block Katghora, bistt. Korba (C.G.) RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. 2. ^ //KS State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.) Commissioner, Tribal Welfare bepartment, Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare bepartment, Korba Joint birector, Treasury, accounts, pension, Bilaspur bistrict Bilaspur (C.6.) WRIT PETCTCON UNbER ARTECLE 226 OF THE CONSTCTUTCON OF INblA 3. 4. ^' '^0 ^^4^ ashok PEIITIONER NIGMC©URTlQB^HHAmS<3ARH:BILASPUR 1 WRrt" PETiriON (S) NO. 3.<©8OF 2011 . Smt. Chandravati Kareem RESPONDENTS Versus , State ofChhatBsgarh & CXhers (Writ Petition underArticle226 ofthe Oonstttution of India) SingleBench:Hon'bteShriSatishK.^n»iotri,J. ':..:. ^•»^^N««^WNi»W»»<l|l«i»iia<»(<»»N.«»»N'*»*^i»i*»<(^^^ 13r^a^-: ^hi'iAmitjShaff^ Shri N.N.Roy, Panet t-awyerfor the State. :QRDER;(ORAUC;:''::;:.:..'\.,,,;r:''^: 'l. (Passed onthls 018t ctey ofjyly, 2011} . 1. HeardleamedcounselforthepartuBS. „ 2. Leamed counsel appeanng for ttie f»titionersubmits thsrii th®petitiwier is entjtted to toeneflt off two^ advance increniente on awourat of ha^ng ^s^dB.Ed; ^Kamination intheyear 1970^^^^^t^ on 17.09.1976. atherowncost It 1s submitted thatthfr tesue invoh^dln ttie presenrt petition is no longer resintegra, asthe same has been finally c?e<?i!dect fc^ tl^SupremeGpMrtti^h| Sa^my.S^cyWP.S^Q^. 3. It is further submitted that this Court has als®taken a simitar view in ite order dated 6-2-2009 passedinW.P.(S) No.6257 of 2008, l^eamed counsel further submits that the onler dated 29-4-2010 passed in W.A.No.124 of 2009, v^ereln relyii^ upon thejudgmentoftheSiiprenBe Court in Asha Saxena ^vysf) and the ordw pa?i^ in another W.A.No.87 _of 2009, clir^ctions hsive been iasued for consideration of the case for g|rantofftw^ ae^nce incn^ente drcuiar dated 21 -9-1974 tesued tsy the Stete ef IVtedhya Pradesh, after veirifi<^on ofthefi^pteat^ in^Ret|ti^ 4. Learned counsel appearing forjhe Stete submite that tti®csse of ttie petitiwier would also be cpnsidered on ttie same Ijnes. 5. In view ofthe above, thepotitton is disposecl ef wlth a dlrectionto the respondent authprities to <||eci<|6 the claim of e petitioner for grant of two advance increments, asj?er the drcylarctat^t 21-9-1^4, teued by Ihe State ofMadhya Pradesh afterverification pfthefeustepleade^inttie peHtion within apenpd of8 weeks^^^^ f Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge 12009(Ht)MPJR(SC)59