IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1715 of 2007 1. MD.ALI JAN, SON OF LATE DAUD MIYAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-JANGALIA, WARD NO.9, P.O. & P.S.-GOPALGANJ, DISTRICT-GOPALGANJ. (PLAINTIFF NO.2/ APPELLANT NO.2)……………………………..................................PETITIONER. Versus 1. SAMSUL HODA, SON OF LATE OLI MIYAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-JANGALIA, WARD NO.9, P.O. & P.S. GOPALGANJ, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ. (DEFENDANT NO.1/RESPONDENT NO.1). 2. KURAISHAN KHATOON, DAUGHTER OF LATE OLI MIYAN, WIFE OF HASIM MIYAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-FATAHA, P.O. & P.S. GOPALGANJ, DISTRICT-GOPALGANJ. (DEFENDANT NO.2/RESPONDENT NO.2). 3. RAJAISHAN KHATOON, DAUGHTER OF LATE OLI MIYAN, WIFE OF NOORHODA MIYAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- FATAHA, P.O. & P.S. GOPALGANJ, DISTRICT-GOPALGANJ. (DEFENDANT NO.3/RESPONDENT NO.3). 4. ASARPAT KHATOON, DAUGHTER OF LATE OLI MIYAN, WIFE OF SAHEB HUSSAIN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SISWAN, P.S. & P.O. BARHARIA, DISTRICT-SIWAN. (DEFENDANT NO.4/RESPONDENT NO.4). 5. ARSHAN, DAUGHTER OF LATE OLI MIYAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-JANGALIYA, P.O. & P.S. GOPALGANJ, DISTRICT- GOPALGANJ. (DEFENDANT NO.5/RESPONDENT NO.5). ……………………………………..OPPOSITE PARTIES 1ST SET. 6. MOHAMMAD ISRAIL, SON OF RASOOL MIYAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-JANGALIYA, P.O. & P.S. GOPALGANJ, DISTRICT-GOPALGANJ. (DEFENDANT NO.6/RESPONDENT NO.6). 7. JANRUL HAQUE, SON OF ASARUDDIN ANSARI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-MAHUA TOLA DUMARIA, P.O. & P.S. BAROULY, DISTRICT-GOPALGANJ (DEFENDANT NO.7/RESPONDENT NO.7). 8. MAJAHRUL HAQUE, SON OF ASARUDDIN ANSARI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-MAHUA TOLA DUMARIA, P.O. & P.S.-BAROULY, DISTRICT-GOPALGANJ (DEFENDANT NO.8/RESPONDENT NO.8). 9. APSAR JAHAN, WIFE OF SAIYED HASSAN ANSARI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-FATAHA, P.O. & P.S. GOPALGANJ, 2 DISTRICT-GOPALGANJ (DEFENDANT NO.9/RESPONDENT NO.9). ………………………………………OPPOSITE PARTIES 2ND SET. 10. JAN MOHAMMAD (PLAINTIFF NO.1/APPELLANT NO.1). 11. MOHAMMAD HUSSAIN (PLAINTIFF NO.2/APPELLANT NO.3), BOTH SONS OF LATE DAUD MIAYAN. 12. ASHAIYA KHATOON, DAUGHTER OF LATE DAUD MIYAN, WIFE OF CHAND MOHAMMAD (PLAINTIFF NO.4/APPELLANT NO.4). ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-JANGALIA, WARD NO.9, P.O. & P.S. GOPALGANJ, DISTRICT-GOPALGANJ. ……………………………………..OPPOSITE PARTIES 3RD SET. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Kumar, Advocate. ---------- 2. 8.3.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the impugned order having been passed by the appellate court affirming the order of the trial court dismissing the application of the plaintiffs under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, this Civil Revision may not be maintainable in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Shiv Shakti Coop. Housing Society, Nagpur Vs. Swaraj Developers and others, reported in (2003)6 Supreme Court Cases 659 and Surya Dev Rai Vs. Ram Chander Rai and others, reported in (2003)6 Supreme Court Cases 675 as also the decision in Smt. Mina Devi Vs. Smt. Jagtarni Devi and another, reported in 2008(2) PLJR 451 and unreported 3 decision of this Court in Uma Shankar and others Vs. Dr. Hamid Hussain and another (passed in C.R. No.1377 of 2006). However, it is submitted that the proviso to Section 115 (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure cannot take away the right of the petitioner from challenging the impugned order by filing a properly constituted writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Thus, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Civil Revision to seek any other remedy which is available to him under law. In above view of the matter, this Civil Revision is dismissed as withdrawn. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)