mmmumumm .wlm Elm: 3wEHZHm4m3iwH€m .lmwHwCE mN4 mwZwH$DF mmEmI $.m. Lbm%r$¢mu mnwu%mn ‘xwm#mwtv mummWwwmm mmmm mmn m% Ewwm mmmwaw $$Rw c$mm btmw&“ mW mmwwm mDwmCm I wmmw mn$mmw3wwmw wmwwcmu . W ¢mwmCm m% E$m$wm w$wmm&$ &?m w$W3nm .&- Wlmwknn M‘ mmmwmEmmK%m film III :4 Iv“ & E3- !:"X‘ "1 mUTHm KL! (“Mil “l3 '4 m :3‘ w£ mi ”2 m m m wwwmm amq Fm mEmwwu. £$N mZ§FHDmu .fJz whu. xi Dm% £wwu _mwwmm&Q « A3§ W& ,3Q % m 3 w $- $mmwm&mnw Funwv. EdEm ‘ImmnmtmW mw~ mm?mww m$$ww$m hwy WEy" . \Qc‘ APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL§ Presem: None for the petitioner. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 707 0f2005 PETITIONER B.Bariha. VERSUS State ofMadhya Pradesh & Others. RESPONDENTS ACT‘ 1985. SB: Hon’ble Sllri Satish K. Aggihotri: J. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for tha State‘ ORDER ORAL) (Passed on 23’ day of September, 2009) The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. In View ofthe above; the matter is dismissedfor want ofprosecution. Registry is directed to send a copy ofthis order to the petitioner, forthwith. / / Sdl— Judge j, Si “ msh . K. Agnihotr"; ‘ _ X‘ «r— I I K . Ir»