IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 86 OF 2008 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 86 OF 2008 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 86 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 108 OF 2008 IN L.C. SUIT NO. 139 OF 2008 Mrs. Charu w/o. Niranjan Doshi & Anr. ..Appellants (Org. Plaintiffs) Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. Respondents (Org.Defednants) Mr.S.K.Chaursia,Advocate, for Mr. A.M.Saraogi, for the appellants Mrs. Geeta Joglekar, Advocate, for the respondents CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 14th February,2008. DATE: 14th February,2008. DATE: 14th February,2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. A notice was issued by the Municipal Corporation to the plaintiffs for removal of a shutter fixed to the residential premises and also to stop use of the said flat for commercial purpose. The plaintiffs filed the suit challenging that notice and also took out a Notice of Motion claiming certain interim reliefs. The learned trial Court refused to grant ad-interim relie while the Notice of Motion is still pending. 3. After perusal of the record, I do not find any reason to interfere in the impugned order. Therefore, the Appeal stands dismissed ith folloing directions :- The defendants shall file reply within two weeks before the trial Court. If the plaintiffs so desire, they may be allowed to file rejoinder within one week thereafter. The trial Court shall shall hear and dispose of the Notice of Motion within three weeks thereafter. 4. In view of the dismissal of the Appeal, the C.A. does not survive and stands disposed of accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)