... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.281 OF 1995 REVISION APPLICATION NO.281 OF 1995 REVISION APPLICATION NO.281 OF 1995 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri S.R.Shinde, A.P.P for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : OCTOBER 07, 2006. : OCTOBER 07, 2006. : OCTOBER 07, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned A.P.P for the State. By the impugned judgment and order, the complaint filed by the Registrar of Companies, Maharashtra has been dismissed on the ground bar of limitation and the accused persons have been discharged. The learned Judge has held that the department of Company Affairs had knowledge about the commission of the offence by the Respondents on 10th August, 1993. The complaint is filed on 20th September, 1994 i.e. after expiry of stipulated period of one year. No prayer was made for condonation of delay at the time of filing complaint. The learned Judge refused to take cognizance on the ground that the complaint was barred by ... 2 ... limitation. 2. After having heard the learned A.P.P for the State, I find no infirmity in the order. Revision Application is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE