1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application No.91 of 2008 In First Appeal St.No.19369 of 2007 (The State of Maharashtra, through the Collector, Wardha, and others v. Liladhar s/o Pandurangji Pohane, Wardha) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Shri D.P. Thakre, AGP for Applicants. Shri S.U. Nemade, Counsel for Respondent. CORAM : K.J. Rohee & R.C. Chavan, JJ. DATE : 24th March, 2008 1. Heard the learned AGP for the applicants and the learned counsel for the respondent. 2. There has been delay of 542 days in preferring the appeal. The reason for this inordinate delay has not at all been satisfactorily explained. Hence, we are not inclined to condone the delay. 3. The application is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE pdl.