IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-25931 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: September 07, 2010 Mubarik …..Petitioner versus State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr.Salim Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner .. RAJAN GUPTA, J.: (Oral) This is a petition under section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking pre-arrest bail in a case registered vide FIR No.53 dated 31.01.2010 under sections 457/380 IPC at police station Nuh, District Mewat. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that petitioner is not named in the FIR and co-accused have been granted the benefit of regular bail. He further submits that name of the petitioner had figured only during the investigation. He, thus, prays for pre-arrest bail. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The allegations in the FIR are that on 31.1.2010 when the complainant was sleeping in his house alongwith his family members, certain thieves broke into his house and fled away with some cash and silver/gold ornaments. No clue could be found regarding the persons who had committed the theft. The matter was reported to the police. Crl.Misc.No.M-25931 of 2010 - 2 - During investigation, name of the accused-petitioner figured. I am, thus, of the considered view that custodial interrogation of the petitioner may be necessary for taking the investigation to its logical end. The petitioner is not entitled to the concession of pre-arrest bail. Dismissed in limine. September 07, 2010 ( RAJAN GUPTA ) pc JUDGE 2