@ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.A. No. 711 0f2005 /, AppeHants 1. Punaram Sahu, aged 56 years, S,’ o Chhabilal Sahu. Smt. Narbada Bai Sahu, 5O yaara, W] o Punaram Sahu. Both residantof Village-Potekohra, RS. Chichola, District— Rajnandagaon (C. G.). Versus Responchents 1. Jitandra @ Ganash Ram Dsvangan, agsd 22 yeaJ‘s, reSident of Village— Charbhata, RS. Bagnadi, Tahsil and i Disnict- Rajnandgaon (C.G.). V ‘ 2. Rajkumar @ Raj Davangan S/ o Klipa Ram Devangan, agsd 43 yearS, Resident of Chérbhata, RS. Bagnadi, Tahsil and Dimrict— Rajnemdgaon (C.G.). 3. The Branch Manager, The National Insurance Company Ltd., Branch Rajnandgaon (C. (En). DB: Hon’ble Shri Justice S, R. Nayak, C.J. 8t. Hon’ble Shri Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Miss Bharti Manikpuxi, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Plashant Jayaswal, Senior Advocate with 3111i Ali Asgar, Advocate for. fhe Respondent No.3. KO ORAL ORDER ( 7th December 2005) The following order of the. Court was passed by S. R. Nayak, C.J. In a dea’rh case, the parents who are claimants not being satisfied with file compensation awarded by the M.A.C.T. have preferred this appeal. It was contended by Miss Bharti Manikpuri, learned counsel for the appellants that the Tribunal is not justified 1'11 not awarding any compensation towards loss of the estate and loss of love and affection to the aged parents. We find force in the contention. The M.A.C.T. is not justified in not awarding any compansation undéfr the. abeva two heads. Therafore, we: award Rs. 25,000/- towards “loss to the estate.” and a1$o award Rs. 25,000/- towards “lass of love and aEeoti011". 111 all other respect the impugned award shall stand Lmalterecl. The impugned award shall stand modified 1'11 terms of our order. The appeal is aHowed to the above extent. No order as to costsv [0 Sdl- SCI/- Chief Justice“ SATISH K. ANGNIHOTRI Judge