*1* kps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.15/2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1541/2009 Kashibai Shamrao Shinde and others. ..Applicants -Versus- Vijay Pandurang Shinde and others. ..Respondents ........... Mr.M.S.Kumthekar, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr.H.R.Pawar, Advocate for the Respondents. .......... CORAM : K.K.TATED, J. Date : 13th January, 2010. (In Chamber, 02:45 pm) P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2 The Applicants (original Appellants) seek review of the order dated 04th December, 2009 passed in Civil Application No. 4109/2009. I have gone through the review petition. The main contention of the learned counsel appearing for the Applicants is that it remained on the part of Applicants at the time of hearing of the Civil Application No.4109/2009 to produce ad-interim order passed by the City Civil Court in Notice of Motion No.1194/2001 *2* dated 15th March, 2001. Along with the present Review Petition, he annexed the copy of ad-interim order dated 15th March, 2001 passed by the City Civil Court at Exhibit-B. The impugned order dated 04th December, 2009 is passed by this Court after hearing both sides and considering the observations made by the Trial Court, which are recorded in paragraph No.3 of the impugned order. 3 In any event, the ground which is sought to be raised, was very much available when the matter was decided and the same was also raised by the learned counsel for Applicants, which came to be turned down by this Court. In that view of the matter, no error apparent on the face of record can be found in the impugned order invoking review jurisdiction. 4 Considering these facts, I do not find any substance in the present Review Petition. Review Petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. (K.K.TATED, J.)