/ ll;ff :''- BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHMATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FIRST APPEAL No. 2-\ /2011 APPELLANT£ 11 Si:.' f;:": ^\ &^///^ w RESPONDENtS ^ 1. Smt. Surujbai, Wd/o Late Sh'ri Ram Dubey, • Aged about 70 Years, Caste - Brahman, R/o Word No. 12 Vikas Nagar, Chakrbhatha Camp, Bodri, Bilaspur (C.G.) •*. 2. Smt. Shail Kumari, W/o Panch Ram Mishra, Aged about 42 years, Caste- Brahman, R/o Sirgitty, Tarbahar, Bilaspur (C.G.) ^. Smt. Bhagwati, -^ W/o Pankaj Tiwari, Aged about 40 Years, Caste- Brahman, R/o Nayapara Chowk Chakrbhatha Camp, Bodri,Bilaspur (C.G.) i. Smt. Vidhya, ^' W/o Sant Ram Mishra, Aged about 38 Years, Caste - Brahman, R/o Word No. 12Vikas Nagar, Chakrbhatha Camp, Bodri, Bilaspur (C.G.) ^ Smt. Bhuneshwari, /^ W/o RajkumarTiwari, Aged about 25 Years, Caste - Brahman, R/o Near Bannak Chowk, C/o House of Raj Singh, Sitgitty, Bilapur (C.G.) vt^' • • • • . . _ ^ ( The appellants were not parties in the Civil Suit but having vested right in suit land) , ,.:. VERSUS 1. Balkishan Sharma, S/o Kesharmal Sharma, Aged about 47 Years, R/o A/l Satya Niwas Rukmani Vihar, Magarpara, Bilapur (C.G.) fPlaintifn 2. Bhupendra Kumar Dubey S/o Shri Ram Dubey (Dead), Represented bv leaal heir 2a. Smt. Manju Dubey, W/o Late Bhupendra Kumar Dubey, Aged about 30 Years, * 2 b. KrishnaKumar, S/o Late Bhupendra Kumar Dubey, Aged about 11 Years, 2 c. Abhishek Dubey, S/o Late Bhupendra kumar Dubey, Aged about 8 Years, Respondent No. 2b. & 2c are minor hence represented by their natural Guardian & mother Respondent No. 2a. Smt. Manju Dubey Respondents No. 2a to 2c are R/o Kalika Nagar, House of owner of Dubey Tent House, Tifra, Tehsil & District- Bilaspur (C.G.) fDefendants 1 3. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, District Bilaspur, C.G. (Name of Respondent No.3 is not mentioned in Judgment & Decree dated 16/12/2010) fDefendant No.2) FIRST APPEAL UNDER SECTION 96 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE ••a TST '<11<41<'l^, ff'fll+1'IS, [s<Qll<H'J,< ^.....pk...^...^.|4............. ?i1Iraq> S.B. Hon'Ue Shri Justice N.K. Ag 19.02.2011 Shri Hemant Kesarwani, Advcjcate for the appellants. Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel Lawjyer for the State. Leamed counsel appearing foi) the jseeks permission ofthis court to wi1|hdraw |to avail appropriate remedy that ma^ brovisions oflaw. Prayer is allowed and liberty 'ii Consequently, the appeal is brder asto costs. Sahu ^raf^rql^ ^rq^f ^ t^lst ^f^?R ^73ffOT 311*51 appellants, on instmction, this appeal with libert^' be available to him under fhe granted as prayed for. dismissed as withdrawn. No . Registry is directed to retu^n 1fae certified copy of the jimpugned order on counsel's furnisl|iing authenticated true copy of |the same. N.K.Agarawal Judge ?iy?^T'^-Er%?cn^.?, iR'-T:ipTp?--.t-s.ip—^'2010—1,00,000. ^ .3^'- i^^;^