IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14330 of 1999 In the matter of an application under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. ------- 1.MAHAVIR SINGH 2.Shyam Deo Singh Both sons of Late Narayan Singh resident of village-Kurkuri, P.S.-Phulwari, Dist.-Patna. 3.Subodh Kumar Singh son of Satya Nand Singh @ Sharmanand Singh, resident of village-Sarari, P.S.-Shahpur(Danapur), Dist.Patna. 4.Deolal Prasad son of late Bhikhari Rai, resident of village-Bhusaula (Danapur), P.S.-Phulwari,Dist.-Patna 5.Jagdish Prasad son of late Ram Bilash Singh,resident of village-Dhibra, P.S.-Shahpur, Dist.-Patna ……. ……Petitioners Versus 1.STATE OF BIHAR 2.Akhileshwar Prasad Singh son of late Bhagwat Singh, resident of village-Ashopur, P.S.-Danapur, Dist-.Patna ……. …..Opp. parties -------- For the petitioners:None For the State: Mr.Ram Chandra Prasad Singh,APP --------- P R E S E N T The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Rakesh Kumar ------- Rakesh Kumar,J. When the case was called out none appeared on behalf of the petitioners either to press this petition or even to make a prayer for adjournment. 2. Five petitioners, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this court under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, have prayed for quashing of the order dated 28.3.1999 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in Complaint Case No.52C of 1993. 3. I have perused the materials available on the record as well as impugned order. In the complaint case, the complainant was examined on solemn affirmation and three 2 witnesses had come forward in support of the complainant. After being satisfied with the materials available on the record, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate vide its order dated 28.3.1993 has taken cognizance for the offences under sections 419 and 467 of the Indian Penal Code. 4. I do not find any error in the order of cognizance and accordingly the petition stands rejected. 5. In this case by an order dated 1.9.1999 while issuing notice to opposite party no.2 this court had directed that in the meantime further proceeding in the court below shall remain stayed. Subsequently, on 22.12.1999 the case was admitted for hearing and it was directed that interim order dated 1.9.1999 shall continue till the disposal of this application. 6. In view of rejection of this petition, the interim order of stay stands automatically vacated. 7. Let a copy of this order be sent to the court below forthwith. Patna High Court The 20th April, 2010 NAFR/Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)