KPP -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO. 2442 OF 2010 Gulmohar Area Society’s Welfare Group and another ...petitioners vs. Municipal Commissioner of Brihan Mumbai Mahanagar Palika and others ... Respondents Mr. Vibhav Krishna, instructed by M/s. Juris Consillis, for the petitioners. Mr. K.K. Singhvi, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Shobha Ajit Kumar for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Pratik Majumdar, instructed by M/s. M.P. Savla & Co., for respondent No.3. Mr. Rohit Kapadia, Senior Advocate with Mr. B.R. Zavery, instructed by Mr. Bharat K. Gala for respondent No.4. Ms. Ranju Yadav, instructed by M/s.Dhru & Co., for respondent No.5. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & A.A. SAYED , JJ. DATE: FEBRUARY 09, 2011. P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the grievance made by the petitioners in this writ petition may be treated as a representation to the Corporation. Without expressing any opinion on this aspect especially when the Corporation has also filed affidavit-in-reply opposing the petition, we permit the petitioners to make a representation annexing therewith a copy of this petition to the Appropriate Authority of the Corporation within a period of two weeks KPP -2- from today. The Corporation, after receipt of the same from the petitioner, may decide the same in accordance with law and whatever objections raised by the petitioners regarding alleged violations, the same shall be examined in accordance with law and an appropriate decision will be taken by the Corporation within a period of three months from the receipt of the same from the petitioners. It is clarified that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. Subject to what is stated above, the petition is disposed of. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. A.A. SAYED, J.