HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No. 1676 of 2004 O R D E R: There is no representation for the petitioner, who is the defacto complainant. The defacto complainant filed a case against the sole accused for the offence punishable u/Secs.448 and 506 IPC. The learned XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, found the accused guilty. The accused was sentenced to a fine of Rs.1,000/- on each count with appropriate default sentence. The accused thereafter preferred an appeal assailing the Judgment of conviction recorded by the trial court. The learned I Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, through the impugned Judgment found the accused not guilty and acquitted him. Aggrieved by the order of acquittal, the defacto complainant preferred the present revision. 2. Where this revision is against the order of acquittal preferred by the appellate court and where nobody represents the revision petitioner, the criminal revision case is dismissed. _____________ K.G.SHANKAR,J Dt. 08.7.2011 Mjl/*