IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 10291 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 16th February, 2011. Anju Chawla Petitioner through Mr. Sudeep Mahajan, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents through Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab Mr. G.S.Bal, Advocate for respondents NO. 2 and 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 10.05.2010 [Annexure P-8] whereby her services have been terminated by respondent No. 3 College. It is not in dispute that vide the Punjab Affiliated Colleges [Security of Service] Amendment Act, 2007, the State of Punjab has constituted an Educational Tribunal headed by a former Judge of this Court to redress the grievance of the employees of the 'aided' and 'un-aided' institutions. In this view of the matter, the petitioner is relegated to the afore-stated alternative remedy. Registry is directed to return this petition to the petitioner and/or transfer the same to the Educational Tribunal who is requested to decide the matter expeditiously and if convenient, within a period of three months. The appointment, if any, in place of the petitioner shall be subject to final outcome of the proceedings before the learned Tribunal. Disposed of. Dasti. February 16, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE