IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 4TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 15TH MAGHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 722 of 2011() -------------------------------------- CRIME NO.41/2011 OF MATHILAKAM POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT ------------------------------ APPLICANT/ACCUSED ----------------------------------- NISHA, AGED 23 YEARS, W/O.SHIJITH, PANDATHARA HOUSE, KUMBALAPARAMBU DESOM, EDATHIRUTHY VILLAGE. BY SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU, SENIOR ADVOCATE BY ADV.SRI. RAVIKRISHNAN SRI.VIPIN NARAYAN RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT ------------------------------------------------ STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTING THE S.I. OF POLICE, MATHILAKAM POLICE STATION. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZE THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts V. RAMKUMAR, J. ---------------------------------------------------- Bail Application No.722 of 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of February, 2011 ORDER In this petition filed under Sec.438 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is accused No.1 in Crime No.41 of 2011 of Mathilakam Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 302 & 309 I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail. 2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. 3. After evaluating the factors and parameters which are to be taken into consideration in the light of paragraph 122 of the verdict dated 2-12-2010 of the Apex Court in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra and Others (2010 (4) KLT 930), I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the officer- in-charge of the police station concerned to release the petitioner on bail in the event of her arrest in connection with the above case on her executing a bond for `25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the Bail Appln.No.722/2011 -:2:- like amount to the satisfaction of the said officer and subject to the following conditions:- 1) The petitioner shall make herself available for interrogation as and when required by the investigating officer. 2) The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall she attempt to tamper with the evidence of the prosecution. 3) The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail. 4) The bail granted pursuant to this order shall be in force till the end of the trial of the case unless and until it is cancelled by this Court in accordance with paragraph 103 of the verdict in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre's case (supra). If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to her shall be liable to be cancelled. This application is allowed as above. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE skj