IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 22334 of 2004 Between: Mandadi Vishnu Vardhan Rao, S/o. Mandadi guravaiah, Gambheeram Village, Anandhapuram Mandalam, Visakhapatnam. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Hyderabad 2 The District Collector, District Collector Buildings, Visakhapatnam. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Anandapuram, Visakhapatnam. .RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in not disposing of the representation dt. 28-10-2004 of the petitioner as highly arbitrary and illegal and consequentially direct the respondents to consider the representation dt. 28-10-2004 of the petitioner and dispose of the same forthwith by alienating the land to the petitioner to an extent of Ac.0.35 cts in Sy.No. 204, Gambheeram Village, Anandapuram Village, Visakhapatnam, which is in possession of the petitioner for market value Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.T.M.K.CHAITANYA Counsel for Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court at the stage of admission made the following : ORDER: The petitioner claims to be a small farmer having possession of Ac.0-35 cents of Government land in survey No. 204, for the last 10 years and raised teek and mango trees therein. It is also stated that the petitioner owns one acre of zirayithi land adjacent to the Government land. The petitioner stated to have been made a representation dated 4-9-2004 to the first respondent for purchase of the land at market value. It is also stated that pursuant to the representation of the petitioner, the first respondent vide letter dated 29-10-2004 requested the second respondent to send a report for taking necessary action in the matter and in turn the second respondent vide letter dated 9-11-2004 requested the third respondent to submit a detailed report in the matter. Now the grievance of the petitioner is that on 20-11-2004, the third respondent along with his staff visited the land in question and threatened to dispossess the petitioner. The petitioner alleges that third respondent is trying to dispossess him and alienate th e subject land to some third parties. The petitioner seems to have made a representation to the first respondent on 28-10-2004 and filed the present writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents to consider the said representation dated 28-10-2004 and pass orders forthwith by alienating the subject land to the petitioner. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue. Admittedly, the petitioner has made a representation to the first respondent on 28- 10-2004 and without waiting for the reasonable time, rushed to this Court by filing the present writ petition on 2-12--2004 merely alleging that the third respondent has visited the subject land on 20-11-2004 and threatened him to dispossess him. Merely on an apprehension the present writ petition is filed, and it does not warrant any interference from this Court. The writ petition fails and the same is accordingly, dismissed at the admission stage. ____________ N.V.RAMANA,J 03-12-2004 TVK ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Hyderabad 2 The District Collector, District Collector Buildings, Visakhapatnam. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Anandapuram, Visakhapatnam. 4.2CCs to G.P. for Revenue, High Court of A.P. Buildings, Hyd (OUT) 5.2CD copies 6.2CCs to Form-NIC-OGS/WP{SPJS}