IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.287 OF 2005 Raju Laxman Gaikwad ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... Mr.Shrishail Sakhare for Applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste, A.P.P. for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. FEBRUARY 2, 2005. FEBRUARY 2, 2005. FEBRUARY 2, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. Perused the record. 2. In view of the overwhelming evidence on record to indicate the complicity of the Applicant spoken by the witnesses who were neighbours and relatives of deceased as well as two dying declarations, not a case for bail. No reason to depart from the conclusion reached by the Court : 2 : below. Hence, rejected. 3. The Sessions Judge, Sholapur is, however, directed to assign the case to the Fast Track Court, so as to ensure early disposal of the trial. 4. Insofar as the observation made in order dated 31st January 2005, matter be posted on 9th February 2005 for directions, to be included in the supplementary list, immediately after the matters under caption settlement or withdrawal. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.