IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 17TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 26TH BHADRA 1931 WP(C).No. 26229 of 2009(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- R.VIJAYACHANDRAN,PROPRIETOR, RAMAKAMAL RESIDENCY, NEAR SANKER'S HOSPITAL JUNCTION, KOLLAM - 691 001. BY ADV. SRI.B.SURESH KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI. 2. THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN, PATTOM,PALACE P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695004 3. THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN, PATTOM PALACE P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695004. 4. THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, OLD MUNICIPAL OFFICE BUILDING,CHINNAKKADA,KOLLAM-691001. ADV.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHEER, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P(C).No.26229 of 2009 ================== Dated this the 17th day of September, 2009 J U D G M E N T After arguing for some time, when it was pointed out to the learned counsel for the petitioner that the restoration application, which the petitioner wants to be disposed of by the Tribunal is dated 8.9.2009 only, the counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to approach this Court again, if the restoration application is not duly considered by the Tribunal within a reasonable time. Permission is granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above liberty. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge