IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6965 of 2011 SMT. DR. KANCHAN PRABHA SINGH WIFE OF DAYANIDHI SINGH. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.7802 of 2011 DAYANIDHI SINGH SON OF LATE SATYADEO SINGH. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 30.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that Dayanidhi Singh had taken loan of Rs. one crore from the Director of U.S. Construction, Pvt. Ltd. It is alleged in complaint that some payments were made by cheque and some by cash while other by way of supply of materials. Subsequently, said Dayanidhi Singh issued cheque for Rs. 80,00,000/- when the informant went to the bank, the banker conveyed that there is no money in the account. It is submitted on behalf of the learned 2 counsel for the petitioners that no cheque number, issued by either side, has been given in the complaint nor the alleged cheque was ever presented in the bank for the encashment, which is apparent from the F.I.R. For such a huge amount of loan, it appears that no agreement was executed between the parties, it appears that for settling the contractual dispute, criminal forum has been chosen as pressure tactics. It is further submitted that on 23.12.2010, the petitioners’ side lodged a case against the uncle of the informant under Sections 448, 506, 387, 120B and 504 of the I.P.C., and then the present case was lodged on 27.12.2010. So far as, the other petitioner Shri Mati Dr. Kanchan Prabha Singh who is the wife of Dayanidhi Singh, the F.I.R., does not reflect any accusation against her nor she is named in the F.I.R. Considering the nature of accusation and submissions, let the above named petitioners, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of 3 the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas in connection with Dehri P.S. Case No. 683/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)