1 S.B. Cr. Revision Petition No.295/2003 Ram Kishore vs The State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 5.1.2007 HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI G.S. SARRAF Shri Sandeep Mehta, for the petitioner. Shri S.N. Tiwari, Public Prosecutor. Shri G.R. Punia, for the respondents no.2 to 6. <><><> Heard Shri Sandeep Mehta, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri S.N. Tiwari, learned Public Prosecutor and Shri G.R. Punia, learned counsel for the respondents nos.2 to 6. This revision petition is directed against the order of discharge passed by Addl. Sessions Judge (Fast Track) Nagaur on 19.2.2003. It is admitted that the names of the respondents nos.2 to 6 are not there in the FIR. It is also admitted that the injured persons have not stated that the respondents nos.2 to 6 caused any injury to any of them. It is also admitted that barring Manohar Lal, no eye witnesses of the occurrence says that the respondents nos. 2 to 6 caused any injury to the injured 2 persons. The statement of Manohar Lal has been recorded after 18 days of the occurrence. The question is that whether the trial court has committed any error or illegality by not framing charge on the basis of statement of the witness Manohar Lal uncorroborated by the injured persons and the other eye- witnesses. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, it cannot be said that the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the respondents nos. 2 to 6. I am of the opinion that the order of the lower court is in accordance with law and there is absolutely no ground for interference. The revision petition is, therefore, dismissed. (G.S. SARRAF), J. cpgoyal/-