[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.3035 OF 2008 Abdul Jafar Mohd. Arif ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.B.W.Kakade Advocate for Applicant Mr.K.V.Saste APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 18, 2008 DATE : SEPTEMBER 18, 2008 DATE : SEPTEMBER 18, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in CR No.I-169 of 2008 of Dadar Police Station, Mumbai. The said case is under Sections 465, 467, 468, 471, 420 r.w. 34 of IPC. 3. It is the prosecution case that the applicant along with other accused went to the shop of the complainant and purchased 371 dresses. By way of consideration of the said dresses, a Demand Draft [-2-] was given by the accused persons to the complainant, however, the complainant suspected the said Demand Draft, hence, he chased the accused persons. One of the accused persons came to be arrested. It is the prosecution case that the applicant was accompanying the accused persons when they went to the shop of the complainant to purchase the dresses. 4. The complainant has not identified the present applicant as having come to his shop to purchase dresses. There is no recovery at the instance of the applicant. In this view of the matter, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. 5. The applicant-Abdul Jafar Mohd. Arif be released on bail in the sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rs.thirty thousand only) with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The applicant to report to Dadar Police Station Mumbai once in a week till conclusion of the trial. 6. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]