IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7446 of 2009 1. Manju Singh, W/o- LATE PROF. (Dr.) SHEO NARAYAN SINGH 2. ANIL SINGH BISWAS 3. PRAVIN KUMAR SINGH BOTH SONS OF LATE PROF (DR.) SHEO NARAYAN SINGH 4. AMRITA SINGH 5. ARCHANA SINGH 6. POONAM SINGH 7. POORNIMA SINGH ALL DAUGHTERS OF LATE PROF. (DR.) SHEO NARAYN SINGH. ALL RESIDENTS OF MOHALLA , SRI KRISHNA NAGAR, P.S. SASARAM(TOWN) DISTRICT – ROHTAS. Versus 1. VEER KUNWAR SINGH UNIVERSITY , ARA THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR. 2. VICE CHANCELLOR, VEER KUNWAR SINGH UNIVERSITY, ARA. 3. FINANCE OFFICER, VEER KUNWAR SINGH UNIVERSITY, ARA. ----------- 06. 11.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, State as also the University. The grievance of the petitioners is with regard to the payment of pensionary benefit after correctly calculating the total pensionable service. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent- University submits that the pension has been fixed as prescribed under the relevant statutes of the University. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for redressal of his grievance as highlighted in the writ application, 2 petitioners propose to file a representation before the respondent no. 2. In such view of the matter, in case such representation giving specific claims is filed by the petitioners within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider each of the claims raised by the petitioners in their representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without further delay. However, if any of the claims are found not admissible, the same shall be communicated to the petitioners with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)