1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Application No 2850 of 2009 Khushal v. State of Maharashtra -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr M.M. Agnihotri, Adv for applicant Mr D.P. Thakare, APP for State Coram: A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 17th August 2009 1. Applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No. 35/09 registered with Police Station, Bela under Sections 324, 341, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. It is alleged by first informant Sunil, who is son-in-law of applicant, that on 4.7.2009 while he was going by bullet along with his friend, applicant came from behind in a jeep and when he stopped jeep near his bullet vehicle, applicant and his friend fell down. Thereafter he was assaulted by means of stick by applicant and his associates. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant contends that there is matrimonial dispute between daughter of applicant and first informant and out of that dispute, applicant has been falsely implicated. 4. Perusal of discharge summary issued by Swastik Critical Care, Nagpur where first informant and his friend Sunil were admitted on 2.7.09 shows that they were discharged on 3.7.09 after treatment for abrasion. It 2 appears that first informant and his friend Sunil Dhote were then referred to Mayo Hospital. Medico-Legal Certificate issued in respect of first informant shows that he was complaining pain over foot and left knee; there was abrasion over left toe and contusion over left knee. Such certificate issued in respect of Sunil Dhote shows that he complained of headache and that no evidence of any external injury was found. Looking these aspects of the matter, in my opinion, interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant vide order dated 29th July 2009 deserves to be confirmed. 5. Interim bail granted in favour of the applicant vide order dated 29th July 2009 is hereby confirmed subject to the same terms and conditions as are stipulated in the said order. Application disposed of. Hamdast granted. Judge. hsj