:1: :1: :1: HIGH HIGH HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 2 OF 2005. IN CIVIL APPLICATION (M) NO. 1 OF 2004. IN FAMILY FAMILY FAMILY COURT APPEAL st. NO. 40517 OF COURT APPEAL st. NO. 40517 OF COURT APPEAL st. NO. 40517 OF 2005. 2005. 2005. Adhyaatam-Bhamini. ..Appellant. Versus. Jagdish A. Shah. ..Respondent. --- Appellant in person. Respondent in person. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S.B.MHASE & S.B.MHASE & S.B.MHASE & D.B.BHOSALE, D.B.BHOSALE, D.B.BHOSALE, JJ JJ JJ (In Chamber) DATE: DATE: DATE: JULY 13, 2005. JULY 13, 2005. JULY 13, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the petitioner in person. The delay condonation application has already been dismissed with a reasoned order after hearing the Advocate for the petitioner. This is a review petition as against the said order. The review petitioner states that earlier application was not properly heard and was not properly pleaded. No illegality in the earlier order is brought on record, nor the facts brought on record show that, which were not within the knowledge of the petitioner at the relevant time of filing of the application, so as to condone the delay. There is no merit in the application. It is hereby rejected. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, J.) J.) J.)