1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7464 OF 2009 Shantaram Rambhau Sadgir & Ors. ...Petitioners vs. Ravindra Vithoba Tandale & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.S.M.Sabrad for the petitioners None for the respondents CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : JANUARY 4, 2010 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. By this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 12th August 2009 by which the learned Trial Judge has directed that the police aid be made available to the respondents-original plaintiffs for implementation of the order of temporary injunction below application at Exh.5. 2 The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the appeal preferred by the petitioners for challenging the order of temporary injunction is pending before the District Court and the said Appeal is kept for hearing. He submitted that in view of the fact that the appeal is fixed for hearing, police aid cannot be granted to implement the order. He submitted that the petitioners are in possession. 2 3 I have considered the submissions. The order of injunction dated 5th September 2008 is still operating. So long as the order operates, the same will have to be abided by the parties concerned. Therefore, the learned trial Judge was justified in granting the police aid for implementation of the said order. If the appeal is pending against the order of temporary injunction, the petitioners can always apply for appropriate interim relief. 4 Subject to what is observed above, no case is made out for interference. Writ petition is rejected. All contentions of the petitioners in the pending appeal are kept open. JUDGE