{:w‘éAM wmgg H§N§3L§§ $§€§ RAE§EV glQa C»? & §“§{3N’§.E 3%€§§§ aHREE€BWA ME$§€R$§, J WW; §et5$mr§ m: ma”! a}? Ewé: Mehmgecj Nayyar Azania, “g“d &bsui 52 yearg, 32b Lzsis: i? §$haqua by acczsgamm £3 ¥€' 7?, $1 Um? Wmkér am med§ca§ {acihiénen RR) Wag: Chis‘miyi aiiiéry, {Jami Chirmiri, B§S%é. (3’06? 3’1?‘oraa {CG} liEHE‘i in WEf‘aa-aiq gggma‘wEmm 1. uman cf india thraug'h Secretary Maw Mi‘nisi’iy {Mm of CcaL Sansad Bmww, Ths:‘ Siate of ChhaitiSgarh: ihmugh 3§cretaryg Minisfry a? C33}: KKKgS. Bhawan, Fzagaur Chaimwr: cum Mamgmg Dimmer, Sauth Eastern Coa§ Ham, Seéaat Road, Baaspur pa 4. Eirecmr 0i Vigi! nee, S.E.C.L., Seem: Read, EEagpua” The Coi3ecmr; Karea{CG} 07 .mNW m WW? @§§£§§_§§ mmER £RT5$L§ 22g ma; 23? a? {gig Presanf: {3G’RRQ 5 f? JTEMQ $§~ $§§s§§§£§ peti‘iiongr. 9am Parag Kotechg, 'haamed Gaunsei for me P4011 Shri SK Beriwai, ieamed caunse! far ‘ regpcmdent S‘iaie/respar‘denis Shri MP3. Bhatia, N62 mar-mam: c2 5. GA wrihe Shri RS. Nair and {31". N.K. fshukia, Sr. Advocates :uH-iu wam oh” O u: Pw. C‘ i/A AUSny, L-n 1 waméw I». vu A €Giif‘i’8é‘1I£ iOi" v respondents No.3 & 4‘ §_REER (2am Fehmafy, 2&93} R‘ €§ ziéW The toliowing order ot the Court was paseeo by Rajeev Gumaa C.J. 2. The petitioner has rtied this writ petition styled as “Pubiio mterast Lmgaimn" for the following reliefs: “i. Tha Hon’ble Court may kindiy be pieased to cal: for the records il. The Hon‘bie Courts may kindly be meased to aired the Carma: Bureau of mveStigati'on to make an detaii enquiry on i‘ne abeve said matter and $ubmit the§r report enquify on the above said matter and submit their report before the Hon’bie Court and further and further be directed to CB! to registered the case against at! the responeibie persons. iii. The Hoo’bie Court may kindiy he pieased to puntshed the responsibie person in accordance with Saw. i\/.The Hon’oie Court may kindiy be pleased to direct the reeponoeni no.1 and 2 to form the ~ Committee, who Win check the cormption in SECL and the Hon’ble Court kinoiy .be pleaeed to further direct the Govt. to appoint the Chairmen of the Committee to Retired Justice. x d. V. Any othet reiief which thie Hon'bie Court deems fit and :oroper uho‘en the tests and circumstances 0t” the case and inethe interest of justice. Vt.The cost of the petition may Kindly atso he awardeo in favour of the petitioner.” Heard iearned oounsei for the oerttes. @ 3. The petiiioner m substance §$ aneging commissicn of §rreguiariiies by respondenm N03 <34 in $ssuing iransii pass far trazrispartation 01" caai. 4. Far asceriaming ihe 3Qrrestne$s of mg aiiagatmns made by the pemioner against respondents N113 & 4 in me writ petmon, a ‘faci finding enquiry‘ wouid be necessary. Such a ‘fact finding enquiry’ cannc’t be conducted in the vvr—li prsceedings unser Amcis 226 sf the Csnstituiien sf india. 5‘ m this View Gf the matter: we are cf the opinion that it would be appropfiate far the petitiener {o approach eiiher the Ceniral Vigi:ance Ccmmission or any other compeieni authority for redressai of the petitioner‘s grievances projected in the writ petition. 6. With the eheve observation, the wrtt petition stands diseased of. 7. The security amount 0i Rs.2,00G/— deposited by the petitioner be refunded to him. t Sd/- Sdl- t DHIRENDRA MISHRA Chief Jusu'ce i i Judge t t i