1 wp6251-11.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6251 OF 2011 Ganpatraj Badanraj Mehta .. Petitioner versus Smt.Shantabai Barku Mhatre & Ors .. Respondents Ms.Tanmayee Gadre i/by Mr.G.M.Savagave for the petitioner. Mr.S.N.Bhosle, A.G.P for respondent Nos.2 to 4. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 12th August 2011. P.C.: . Heard both sides. The grievance is that the revision application preferred by the petitioner has not been heard. It is stated that the stay is continued date-wise, but, the main matter has not been decided, although the order impugned is dated 22nd December 2010 and the revision application is pending from 30th December 2010. 2 Mr.Bhosle, learned A.G.P was directed to take instructions as 2 wp6251-11.doc to why the revision application is kept pending and why the same is not decided. He stated that the next date of hearing is 17th August 2011 and within a period of four weeks from that date, the revision application will be disposed off. However, the petitioner’s advocate states that considering the prolonged period for which the revision application was kept pending, this period be curtailed by two weeks. 3 After hearing both sides, in my view, the request made by the petitioner for early disposal of revision application is reasonable. Therefore, it is directed that the revision application must be disposed off as expeditiously as possible and in any event before 7th September 2011. Writ petition is disposed off in the above terms. All contentions of the parties on merits and maintainability of the revision application are kept open. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)