IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1115 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 1115 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 1115 OF 2002 Union of India and others ....... Petitioner. versus Shri B.M.Choudhary ..... Respondent. ..... Shri P.M.Pradhan for the petitioner. Shri Rameshkumar Ramamurthy for the Respondent. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR ; V.G.PALSHIKAR ; V.G.PALSHIKAR & SMT. SMT. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DATED; DATED; DATED; 9TH MARCH, 2005. 9TH MARCH, 2005. 9TH MARCH, 2005. P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. By this petition, the petitioner, Union of India, has claimed a direction requiring the Government to adopt the sealed envelop procedure in relation to his consideration for promotion to the post of Chief Commissioner. That procedure is to be adopted in the event of a pending enquiry. If and when the enquiry starts and is completed it is open for the petitioner to make this claim. At present Departmental Enquiry has not yet commenced and hence there is no question of granting this prayer. The petition is therefore rejected as premature. The Tribunal should not be directed to adopt opening of sealed procedure in this case. The order of tribunal is wrong and therefore is set aside. ....