Amii Hi‘iiE CfjmR'i‘ G? {SHHA'E'HSHARH A? giLASQ’UR "WRIT Ni’l‘i’i‘ION (S‘; N0. 455!) 0f2()i')8 Hi'ffi'iQl‘JERS : 14 (3amesh Rm Sam; Aged abom 56 vearsa S/Q Shri Bahaéasr Ram Sam, {Em/i. Primary Schaoiw ,Chachamneta, Biock — Saza‘ Distt. Dlsrg (CG) Mahasmgh Maravi Aged about 64 years, S/o Shi‘i Teika Ram Mara‘vi, Govt. Primary Samoa; Manpur, Mock — Chhuikhaéan, Disit. Rajiiamfagaw {C.G.) VERSUS . Staie Govt. 0f Chhattisgarh, Through: Seacréiz-ny, EEmcz-"iiicril & Trim} 3ewftment, DKE. Ehavan: Raggmr “AGE Digirici Educ-mica Oi'iicei', Disii‘ * Beme’car/Rajmn&gaon 2’ CGA Biwk Edmsa‘xim Officer, Black — Sam/Chhuikhadan (CG) WEE? E3ETHEON UNDE ARTICLE 225 SF THE CGNSTE 1‘ U i EGN OF INDIA §B Eml’me Shz'i Smi§h K. Agnihotri. J. Present: Sim mkant Vanna. Ac'ivacate for me petmmiers. ‘o )7S\ RESPONBENTS [J\ i)s. «UL Shr§ Bhaakar Payasi, Pami Lawyef foy (he StaiS/reizpmdmw. GRAL UREEFR Pasgad an 50‘“. . J1 day 3} "fgggust, 299$} With the consani Ofthe games‘ the matter is: taken up for hsarimg ianajiy. 2. Learmd counsei apgearing for the petiticnersg am instructians. seeks pemlission Qf‘this Court 210 Withdraw this pe‘ti‘iion with libertv to me a {wresemation before the respamient-authori‘iies, in iigm of ihe gTudgmen‘i: anti order c§ated ’24“(}8.1992 passed hV “i‘he Madhya Pradegz State Adminisu'ative ’K‘ribunai, Eabalpm‘, in 0A. N0. 2.745 0f89 (Magihukani Yaciu and 56 ethers V. State ofM.P. & Others) afié subsequent§y camiiamed by the Hon’me $upreme Smart vide Qriier deted GMEL 19.94 passged in $pecia§ Laave )Petiiion {Civii‘y N0. 6892/93. 3. Leameai c'ounsa apgearing for me ni’hsr siaie has no ohéection. Accordiugiy. the petition h diSmj$sed as withdy'awaa wa'th fhe abeve siated *‘\ libemr. NO ardea‘ asio cQS‘is. g Stif— Satish K.Agnih0tri J 5 ~ Judge r 71