Civil Revision No. 3062 of 2010 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3062 of 2010 Date of decision: 11.5.2010 Rajbir ...Petitioner Versus Surinder Ajmani and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. R.K.Dhiman, Advocate for the petitioner S.D.ANAND, J. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that he is not in a position to make a presentation for invalidation of the impugned finding recorded by the learned Rent Controller as also by the learned Appellate Authority. He, however, requests that in the light thereof, the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. The petition shall stand dismissed as withdrawn. However, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner- tenant requests that a little extra large time may be afforded to the petitioner-tenant to vacate the tenanted premises in view of the fact that the grant thereof would enable the tenant to look for an appropriate alternate accommodation which would enable him to keep on earning bread and butter for his family. It is ordered, in the Civil Revision No. 3062 of 2010 -2- **** circumstances of the case, that the petitioner herein shall have six months time from today to vacate the premises aforementioned. Further, the petitioner-tenant shall keep on paying rent regularly. The disposal of this petition in limine, proceeds on an assumption that there is no factual inaccuracy in the averment on behalf of the petitioner. If it transpires, at any subsequent point of time, that this order had been obtained on the basis of any incorrect averment, it (order of this Court) would be liable to be reviewed. Disposed of accordingly. May 11, 2010 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge