WRIT PETiTIQN (01 N0.41^5 QF 2 PgTmONER MotichancS Chandra, S/o Daula! Chandra, ageci about 45 ysars, Occupation Agriculturist, R/Q village Kachanda, Tahsil Jaijaipur, DisSrict Janjgir-Champa (CG). RESPQNDENTS •tl.-, Q. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary', Department of Homs Affairs, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantraiaya, Raipur(CG). The Director Generat of Polics, Police Headquarter, Raipur, District Raipur (CG). The Superintendent of Police, Janjgir- Champa, District Janjgir-Champa (CG). The Sub Divisional Officer of Police, Police Station Jaijaipur, District Janjgir- Champa(CG). The Station House In-charge of Poltee Staticin Jaij'aipur, Districi Janjgir-Champa (CG). B.R. Gandharva, Station House In-charge, Poljce Station Jaijaipur, District Janjgir- Champa(CG). S.P. Rakha, Assistant Sub-lnspector, Police Station Jaijaipur, District Janjgir- Champa(CG). tfe. ^». OWrit petition under Article 226 ofthe CQnstitution of India) Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. AgnihotFi, J. Present: Shri Anand Kumar Tiwari, counsel for the petitioner. ShriShashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondents No.1 to 5. yi—.——l—.«.————>ll>—l———— ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 31st day of Juiy, 2008} With the consent of iearned counsel appearing for the parties, the petition is heard finally. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the Police Station without havingjurisdiGtion has issueda notice to the petitionerto appear in the Police Station on account of the factthatsome money was boirowed from one Faguta! Chandra and the same was not retumed back. He further submits that the Police Station has no jurisdiction to deal with ^ --1- Gowri the civi! matter as to whether money wasborrowed from person orwh&ther th®same has been, if borrowed, retumed back. 3) Be that as it may, the Superintendent of Police, Janjigir-Champa should look into the grievances of the petitioner and take appropriate action.on its own merit, in accordance with faw, to whichtearned counsel appearing for the State/respondehts No.1 to 5 has no objection. Ordered aceordingiy. 4) In view of the foregoing, the petition stands dteposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge rl •5s ^t. •"t -i +