IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 28TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 7TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 35232 of 2008(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- KURIAN VARGHESE, KANNATHANATHU HOUSE, THITTAMEL, CHENGANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.N.ASHOK KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- CHENGANNUR MUNICIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, CHENGANNUR. By ADV. SRI. HARIKRISHNAN, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 35232 of 2008 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 28th November, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioner is aggrieved by Ext. P6 notice issued to the petitioner by the respondent-Municipality directing him to comply with the directions therein or to demolish the unauthorised construction allegedly made by the petitioner. The petitioner submits that he has already filed Ext. P7 objections to the same and therefore the respondent may be directed to pass final orders after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner . 2. I have heard the learned standing counsel for the respondent also. 3. I feel that it is only proper that the respondent passes final orders in the matter after considering Ext. P7 objections and affording the petitioner an opportunity of being heard, against which order the petitioner can file an appeal as provided in the Kerala Municipality Act. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible. Till then, no coercive proceedings shall be taken against the construction in question. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.