^s' lT'pme^ 'tO^.P.3 ¥K?'PSSIEP- larimiES r^/vrTfifc^i ^fcip- Tvvvwf^&'v-vTsk'ey- ff^vs S.5S &S3.5Gt SS&SSSS. ^^fVKi ^^ff ^fUS^&^^.S.UKSs ^J .P.NO. °>•?& / 2006 Sfc. Vmcent Pallotti College, Through Fr. Sebenius Kujur, S/o Shri Bamabas Kujur, tle / S€€t€taT<r. Vidhya Protsahan Sangh, ( R/o Palloti Ashram } Lodhipara Kapa Raipur-(C.G.) Versus 1. 6>A/ •^^ ^••••^^ '.-A )^p?^"^ State of Chhattisgarb Through The Secretary SchoQi Educatfoft Department, Govt. o£Chhattisgarb, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, Dist; Raipur-(C.G.) The Regional Director, National Council For Teaeher Education. Westeni Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shyamla Hills, Bhopal - (M.P.) The Director State Education. Research & Training Council Shankar Nagar, Raipur, Dist: Raipur-(C.G.) Pt. Ravi Shankar University, Through - The Re^strar, Raipur, Dist: Raipur-(C.G.) I (2) WRIT PBTiTIOS U/A 22S / 227 OF TKB CGNSTITUTIOK OF HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATnSCtARH : BILASPUR (DIVISIQN BBNCHl CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI DHIRENDRA MISHRA, AND HQN'BLE 8HRI SATI8H KLTMAR ASNIHQTRI, JJ Peutioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents WRIT PBTITION N0. 2829 QF 2006 Maulaaa Azad CoUege of Educatioa VERSUS State of Chliattisgarh & otfaers. WMT PETITION N0. 4911 OF 2006 G.D.R. Educational Societ\' VERSUS State of Chliattisgarh & others. WWT PBTITION N0. 4242 OP 2006 C.G. Mahila Mahavidyalaya VE8SUS State of Chliatdsgarh & others. WRITJPETITION MQ.^29 OF 2006 St. Thoinas CoUege VERSUS State of Chliattisgarh & ofhers. WRIT PETITION N0. 951 OF 2006 Christ CoUege, Jagdalpur VERSUS State of CIihatdsgarh & others. 1^ Petitioner Respondents WMT PETITION HO. 932 OF 2006 St. Viacent PaUoti CoUege VERSUS State of Chhatdsgarh & others. Prcsent:- Mr. SunU Otwani, Mr. PTaruU Bharat aad Mr. S.K. Thoman, teamed counsel for fhe petitioncr (s). Mr. Vinay Hant, lear&ed Dy. A.G., forfhe State/respondents. Mr. P.K. Verma, leamed Sr. Advocate with Mr. Raghvendra Verma, Mr. Jitendra Pau aad Mr. Gouree Shankar, leamed couusel for ofher respondents. Director, State Education Research and Tramiag CouncU is present ia person. ORDER (Passed ea 10th Janaary 2007) The foUowing order of the Court was passed by Dhirendra Mlshra, J. The above petitions are beiag disposed of by fhis cominoii order as leamed counsel for appearing for the parties joiaUy submits fhat the facts and question of law involved in fhe present petitions are coinmon,. Mr. Vinay Harit, leamed Dy. A.G. appearing for fhe State/respondents on instructions froia Director, State Education Research aad TTauuag Councfl. states that the Govenunent has decided to niake neccssaiy am.endinents m fhe prevalent law in fhe light of decisions rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matters of Dr. Pradeep Jaln etc Vs. Unlon of India and others (AIR 1984 S.C. 14201, The Kerala BducaUon BiU. 1957 (.MR 1958_8.C^9S6L T.M.A. Pal Foundatton and others Vs. State of lt6 Karnataka and others. (20021 8 S.C.C. 481 and P.A. Inamdar and others Vs. State of Maharasfatra aad others. (20051 6 S.C.C. 537. He submits fhat the aB fhis exercise, ui auy case, will be completed beforc 318t March 2007. In view of fhe submission made by Mr. Vinay Harit, leamed Dy. A.G., learued counsel for the petitioners seek to withdraw fheir petitions wifhL liberty to file aEresh in case aay cause of action survives. However, fhey submit that durmg pendency of fhese petitions effect aad operation of the rules were steyed by fhis Court as a result of which the petitioners/iastitutions have admitted studcnts in fheir institutious, fherefore, intertm order passed by fhis Court mav be directed to contmue tfll fhe amended rules are finaUv nottfied bv the State Govemm.ent. Prayer inade by learaed couasel for the petitionere appears to be just aad reasonable. In view of submissions made by the parties, the iastaat petitions are disposed of wifh Uberty to fhe petitioners to ffle appropriate proceedings available under the law if cause of action siuvives to them after withdrawal of their petitions and the interim order passed by this Court from tiine to time shaB remain ia force till the amended rules are notified bv the State. A copy of this oider be placed on. the record of the coanected writ petitions. ^^ __ - -— - Sdl- Dhirendra Mishra judge Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge /'