IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICAURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) w.P. N6?>(é§€ 1205!; T PETITIONERS 1/ Jeevan Sagar S/o. Baaz Sagar Aged about 25 years I R/o. Ramsagar, Pithora Tahsil & Dist. Mahasamund (C.G.) /2/ Dilip Kumar Das S/o. Aalekh Das Aged about 25 years R/o. Vill. Baradoli, Post Patsendri, Via—Saraipali Tahsil and District Mahasamund (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS y The State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantraiaya Raipur (C.G.) 2,’ The Secretary Department of Education D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur (C.G.) 3; Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat Mahasamund District — Mahasamund (C.G.) 4. The Collector District Maha’s’amund (C.G.) Saraipali,Distt Mahasamund (C.G.) Komal Prasad Mannade / Slo.Vishal Ram Mannade R/o. Vill. & Post Nartora, Via— Pithora, Tahsi! and District Mahasamund (C.G.) Dwarika rasad Patel, S/o. Parikshit Pate}, R/o. ViHage Godbaha! Post Pithora, Tahsil and District Mahasamund (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA P XI-HC-22 03 08.2005 Shn R Pradhan counsel! for the petitioners Advocate for the Smte/ respondents ShnArun Sao, Dy Govt. No. 1, 2 8r. 4 on advance copy. w.p. mo. 3186 of zoos: ‘ Heald’onadmiSsion. ’ /, By way Of this writ petition nled under Article 226/ 227 of the ’ Constitution of‘IndiVa, the peti doners have mainly chanenged’ the 3 appointments of respondents 'No. 5 8n 6 to the post of Shikshakarmi Grade-ll (Enx I Mahasamund, DishictfMaha ‘ I Admittedly; the appoinul tents of the respondents No. 5 & 6 are governed by the provision; of M P (C G) Panchayat Shiksha 'Kamis (Recmiunent and Com mons of Semoe) Rules, 1997 Rule 3 12 of the aforesaid [rule-s provnles for an appeal agmnst the onier y Teacher) in District Panchayat t und (C.G.) ’ I passed/covered under theafoxe said rules. Since there is already p i me is an efficacious alternativ I am not inclined to entertain dismissed. At this stage, learned counsel for the petmoners plays for granting them Ia liberty to Appellate Authon'tyl This libert vision of appeal winch aooomdmg to mmedy available to the petitioners, ' writ peu'tion. Thewvrit peti1ion is 111a appropnate appeal befoxe the is granted to the petitioners /’i If so advised,“ the petitio: Appellate Authority under Rule with the aforesaid ob$e1va1ions, this petition is anally disposed of at mo11'on stage. ' Consequently, M.W.P. No. 2669 of 2005 also stands disposed of. Gel lilied cOpy as per rule: nets may El: an appeal before the 12 of the afomsaid Rules. Sd/— Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge