© IRE AT BiLASPUR, CS^HATTISQARH ^^^3^ S^»S M. 1. Sukhnaft, S/o Lakhanram Koshta aged about57vears. 2. Shambhunath, S/o Lakhanram Koshta, aged about 45 years. 3. Manki Bai, W/o Meghnath Koshta aged about53years. 4. Shanfi Bai, W/o Laxman Koshta aged about46years. 5. Krantibai, W/o Bhagwan Dewangan D/o Lakhariram Koshta, aged about 39 years A!l resident of Village & Tahsil Kondagaon, District Jagdalpur. 6. Anti Bai, aged 3g years W/o Ganesh Koshta, R/o Vil!age Narayanpur, Distt- Bastar(C.G.). 7. Roop Slngh, aged 62 years S/o Bajarbattu, R/Q Kohkapa! TahsiS Jagdalpur, Distt-Bastar (C.G.). Versus 5. Ganeshram, aged about 62 years S/o Ramsingh, by caste-Koshta. Mohan Singh, S/o Mangairam Koshta, aged about 55 years. Sukmani Bai, W/o Harilal Koshta agsd about 53 years, No.1 to 3, resident of viilage-Post and Tahsil Kondagaon, Distt. iastar (C.G.). Premsingh, S/o Mangairam Koshta, aged about 50 years, R/o Village JagdaSpur, District Bastar (C.G.). The State of Chhattissarh Collector, Bastar (C.G.). pl'esent: Shri Sanjay Agrawal, learned counsel for the applicants. ORAL ORDER ~SK In the light of the order passed by me today in M.C.C. No. 495 of 2006 and for the very same reasons setout by me in the above order, this M.C.C. is ordered as prayed for, however, subject to the appiicants paying cost quantified at Rs. 300/- to the Chhattisgarh High Court Legal Sen/lces M W Committee within a period offifteen days from today. The costs should be paid by the concerned leamed counse! without seeking reimbursement of the same from the parties. / : Sd/- Chief Justice 1 ^- <, •