IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 84 OF 2011 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 43 OF 2011 SHRI. RATNAKANT RAMCHANDRA SALGAONKAR (EXPIRED) THROUGH LR'S., ... Applicant Versus SHRI. NAVNATH V. SALGAONKAR ALIAS SHRI RAGHUNATH R. SALGAONKAR ... Respondent Mr. Sudesh Usgaonkar, Advocate with Ms. R. Pereira, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. M. B. D' Costa, Senior Advocate with Mr. John A. Lobo, Advocate for the Respondent. Coram:- F. M. REIS, J. Date:- 28th September, 2011 P.C. Heard Shri S. Usgaonkar, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant and Shri M. B. D' Costa, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Respondent. 2. Perused the application for stay. The impugned Decree is only to partition the suit property. No prejudice would be caused to the parties in case the exercise to partition the suit property is proceeded with. Hence, in the facts and circumstances of the case, I find no reason to grant any stay of the Decree at this stage. As such, the application stands dismissed. F. M. REIS, J. arp/*