_.a"s*"i«ss,_ v ^-y./ ^o^ 'y^ ^ST ~^WM^, Bfll^'Ko, fsjdiylj,< •w^ifi'vsv ('y^^fi) inoie Bench: Honb Petifjoner (Pstition U/A Sm Bhi Prii &is Versus 1. S a (C M". H.B. A9arwai, Sr. Adv. with AAr. YashwcMit Singh Thakur, t)y. shereby the petitioner h< 3y the instant petition Annexure P-4 dated 12,10.20061 vacate the 9overnment accomm^dation occup'sd by.he:-' c" Chitaianka within a oeriod .:•? t'-'l fteu ItlJU^UUS W:-£-£0',-- "'til'ilii'l'il'l lillRTf 'if fS^ <[o](t;l< ^aifBHan^i p6 of Constitution of India) Leeia Bhushnam, wife of Shri Surendra ^hnam, a9ed about 38 years, resident of jar'y Health Centre, Chitlanka, Clantewada. •iet Dantewara (Chhattisgerh) ite of Chhattisgarh, Through; ths :retary, Heaith tiepQptment, D.K.S. Bhawan, |ntrclaya, 6.E. Road. Raipup (Chhattisgcrh) lef AAedical snd Heaith Officer, Oistpict bth Bastar, &antewara, District Dantewora ihGtttsgsrh) \s. Rinki Tamrakar, Adv. forthe petitioner. Advocate Seneral for the State. he petitioner has impugned the order ^'^^•'i f^-fr^ -FS,'!97—3/2008—40,000 311^1 qil ^sr "4i'4i<n<4, ®Ti1'H'i<o, fs(<ni'My,<. c Ahne oreviolus frojn Hosoital, Dantewada to her origii Chandenaar, Dantewada. Mr. Thakur. learned Deout' submits that so far QS order of the oetitioner .was dir-ected to vcj was allotted to her at her has alreadv been transferred accommodation. However, consic|e Annexure P-5 has been stayed M the stay order is oDeratiye for Dress her transfer order of far i+ pertains to challenqe to th| the right of the respondent Stat^ of the petitioner in the event of <| On the other- hand, submits thort- he is not Dressino t| of Annexure P-4 dated 12.10.200^. In view of above submissij instant petition. so far as it 12.10.2006, tha same is dismissef far it relctes to order of Anrji <^T<!ti<'l41l 'WRT? ^f ftT^t <f^-^.l< ^Taffiin 3]i^i al place of postin9 i.e. Sub Health Centre, If Advocate Seneral aooearina for the Stote sxure P-4 dated 12,10.2006 is concerned, lcate the aovernment accommodation which otace of Dostinq at Chitaicnka since she thort' olace. she has no riaht to retain that ^ering the fact that her transfer order of this Court yide order dated 6.11.2006 and Imore than two years. the State does not P-5 and the petition may be allowed so fc transfer order of Annexure P-5 reservinq to pass any order in relation to the posting kdministrative exiaency. Senior Advoccrt'e for the oetitioner is oetition so faras it reiates to the order Annetxure ieaitned ins of !earnsd counsel for the Darties. the elates to order of Annexure P-4 dated as not pressed. However, the petition, so sxure P-5 dated 12.10.2006 whereby the ?!r^te ^T^ TSf -I-'S/197—3/2008—10,000. "\ ^ ^ST •^i^i<?i<<, ®Tiiy'ie,f°4'vliyl^'(. 311^1 T?^ (l^ii't'^) ?WIW ^lfCT <RI^f v ci>i<)fo<l<il •^ff*1<"1t "^* 1^T3t <M^.!< ^aifim 3ii^!i petitioner has been transferre< l-1ealth Centre. Chandenaar, the P-5 is hereby auashed. . However, itshal! be oper^ to the petitioner's services und^ Certified copy as per rule^ from Esistrict Hospital, Oantewada to Sub Isame is ailowed and the order of Annexure to the State to pass any order in relation ^r administrative exigencies Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ?T?T=Rt? ^U? 4riutl<?i-11, ^ -FS/197—3/201)8—40,000.