IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Government Appeal No.1851 of 2001 (Old No.394/1999) WITH Special Leave to Appeal Application State of Uttarakhand … Applicant/Appellant Versus Anup Sarkar … Respondents Sri Harish Pujari, learned Addl. G.A. for State Dated: May 19, 2008 Coram Hon’ble Prafulla C.Pant, J. Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Sri Harish Pujari, learned Additional G.A. for the State and perused the judgment and order dated 17.9.1998 passed by Additional Sessions Judge (E.C. Act) Dehradun in S.T. No.148/1994, whereby the accused-respondent Anup Sarkar is acquitted of the charge of offences punishable under Sections 302 IPC and 201 IPC. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant and after going through the impugned judgment and order passed by trial court, we do not find any sufficient ground to grant the leave as the judgment is well discussed and there are sufficient reasons recorded by the trial court to come to the conclusion that the charge against the accused-respondent is not proved. Leave to appeal is refused. The appeal stands dismissed. (Dharam Veer, J.) (Prafulla C.Pant, J.) Rajeev Dang