IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.49701 of 2008 1. KATO YADAV, SON OF LATE CHOBA YADAV 2. ASHOK YADAV, SON OF SIR SUKDEO YADAV BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NAKATA, P.S.-CHAKAI, DISTRICT-JAMUI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 15-01-2009 Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioners are accused in a case under Sections 147, 341, 323, 504, 452 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners’ anticipatory bail application was earlier rejected twice by the court below. The petitioners, however, did not move this Court against the order of rejection of anticipatory bail application. A fresh bail application was filed before the District and Sessions Judge taking a ground that one of the co-accused, namely, Luttan Yadav was put on trial and was acquitted. The submission is that he did not make statement in Court regarding the said theft or dacoity. The ground taken by the petitioners are that the informant had not supported his case in the court below with respect to dacoity. However, considering that the petitioners have taken six years to come this Court for anticipatory bail, I am not inclined to grant them anticipatory bail. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui may look into the affidavit, Annexures and judgment and dispose of their regular bail application within one week of its filing. S.Sb/- (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)