IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18314 of 2009 SARITA DEVI WIDOW OF LATE UDAY SHARKAR PANDEY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SIKANDARA, P.S. SIKANDARA, DISTRICT JUMAI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, PATNA. 2. THE DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION, BIHAR PATNA. 3. THE DIRECTOR, PROVIDENT FUND, BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, PATNA. 5. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER , LAKHISARAI. 6. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, PATNA. 7. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, LAKHISARAI. ----------- 02. 23.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance raised in the writ application is with regard to the Provident Dues which has not been settled as yet In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of her claims, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 5 enclosing the copy of the relevant documents if any, in support of such claim along with certified copy of the present order within a period of eight weeks from today. In case such representation is filed, the respondent – 5 shall consider each of the claims raised 2 by the petitioner in his representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievance of the petitioner could be settled with statutory interest without delay. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)