S.B.CR. MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO.7412/2008 Rajkumar and Anr. Vs. State of Raj. 13.10.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH BHAGWATI Mr. Nawab Ali Rathore for the petitioners. Mr. Jinendra Jain, Public Prosecutor for the State. The accused petitioners Rajkumar and Rajest Agarwal are alleged to have been involved in the offences under Sections 3, 4, 5 & 6 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 which pertains to FIR No.33/2008 of Police Station Muhana, Jaipur. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as also the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the material on record. The learned counsel for the petitioners has contended that they have been falsely implicated in this case and they have nothing to do with the commission of the said offences. The main accused of this case is Rajendra Agarwal who is involved in running the business of brothel/prostitution which is likely to take time. They have been in custody since last 25 days. Hence, they deserve bail in this case. The learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail petition. Having reflected over the submissions advanced by both the parties and scanned the material available on record, I, without commenting on the merits of the case, do feel inclined to grant bail to both the accused petitioners Rajkumar and Rajesh Agarwal. -2- In the result, the bail petition filed on behalf of the petitioners Rajkumar and Rajesh Agarwal is allowed and it is ordered that both the accused petitioners shall be released on bail on their furnishing personal bond each in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One lakh) together with two surety bonds each of Rs.50,000/- to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation they shall appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till the trial is concluded. (MAHESH BHAGWATI)J. PCG