HC-22 311^1^1 h-Ush Sf^V ?b+li<^ yf^^t Tsg'^iraRR, riTllti'lii, fawi'ay SIT^T iRg? HIHVII sh*<l<»i"""""""""""""""""""'^ 200 '^^ff'" 311^1 ^RIWHfOT W.P. PETITIONER Dr. Dev| Occ^ipation Vetejriaaiy Danltewada Vs RESPONDENTS 1. Statfc Dep|; Mai(tralaya, (Petition U/A 22 of Chhattisgarh, fhrough, Secretaiy, >^rtment of Agriculture (Veterinary) Mailtralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipiir(CG) Director, Veterinary Services Danjtewada, Distt-Daatewada (CG) fpl'2'27 of Constitution oflndia) 2. Dep|uty- Siiiele Beuch; Hoa'ble Mr. jlustice Dhireadra Mishra petit|Loner. 15.12.2008 Mr. Atul Paridey, Ad^ Pandey, counsel for the ShriArun Sao, Govt. Heard. Gnevance of th.e Assistant Veterinary Surg|s District-Dantewada. Vide he has beeu traasfen'ed District -Sarguja on his ow^ passiag of fhe above transfet Iroin his present place ofpo; Leamed couiisel for tl faas already submitted his represeniauon has itOL Ueeu ehW1?T*l1'T *-IW^ff ^ I^l<i1 <r<i1't-$l< ^7 3lfi(FT Sn^I rsi No.6958/3008 IKanhiya Lal Raui, S/o Shri Brahman Ram., aged about 33 years, ipation-Veterinary Assistaut Sui^eon, Hospital Doraapal, Distt. L(CG) ocate appears on behalf of Ms. Deepali Advocate for the State. peti|tioner is fhat, he is presently posted as ;on at Veteruiary Hospital, Doruapal, onfter ofAimexure P-1 dated 30th June 2008, |to Veterinary Hospital Kamleshwarpur, request. However, even after 5 nionths of order, the petitiouer has not been relieved t.tmg. fhe petitioner subiuits fhat the petitioner r^presentation for his iclieving, however, his 'dticlded.—~~ -^——' —^— -K -HC-22 Sn^T^iT fN?73iitw ?f^ ^ti^ -3^ -^WM^, ^VW. hww-y. 3TT^?T 'q^g? II*<CTI a)*<ich"""""""""""""""""""'?FI, 200 •fq^T" sii^i'rcnw^ito -2 On. fhe ofher hand, lt tfae petitioner files a &esh| for being relieved ia compli^nc 30tK June 2008 within a w4ek the saine shaU be considi withia a ftu-ther period o^ representatiou. In view ofthe above the rastant petition is fresh representation before) present place of postiug of ttiis order. On such considered and decided by of three weeks fi-oiu the datls ^ <tii'<f<"l''fl-( WRlf ^ f^zt <P!]«]< ^? sipgH aii^r ;amed counsel for fhe State subinits fhat if representation befQre fhe respondent No.2 in.ee oftransfer order ofAiuiexure P-l dated from today along witti copy of this order, red aad decided by fhe respondent No.2 fhree weeks from the date of receipt of disijosed wilthui replresentation ^ubnussion ofleamed counsel for the State, of with Hberty to fhe petitioaer to ffle the respoudent No.2 for reUeving Irom his seven days from today along with copy beiag inade, the same shaU be |fhe respondent No.2 withia a further period ofreceipt ofthe representation. -&- [^^fwt