:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1799 OF 2008 Sanjay Natani ..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. ..Respondents Mr. Prasad Das i/by Goenka Law Associates for petitioner. Mr. V.B. Konde-Deshmukh, APP for State. CORAM: SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI,J. Date : November 19, 2008. Date : November 19, 2008. Date : November 19, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner is seeking quashing of complaint being Case No. 09 of 2005, which is pending before the learned JMFC, Thane. In the said case process came to be issued against the petitioner under Sections 409 and 379 of IPC. 3. It is seen that the stage of the case is that :2: only process has been issued against the petitioner and no further development has taken place. It is clear that if the process is quashed, the entire proceeding in respect of the petitioner would come to an end. 4. For the reasons recorded in the order passed by this Court in the case of V.K. Jain Vs. P.V. Padode; 2005(3) Mh.L.J. 778 2005(3) Mh.L.J. 778 2005(3) Mh.L.J. 778, which has been upheld by the Hon’ble Apex Court, I am of the opinion that the petitioner has an efficacious remedy of preferring revision against the order of Magistrate issuing process. Hence, in my view, it would be appropriate that the petitioner prefers a revision before the concerned Sessions Court against the order of the Magistrate issuing process. 5. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to prefer the necessary revision before the concerned Sessions Court. The learned Advocate for the petitioner makes a statement that the necessary revision will be preferred within four weeks from today. In view of this statement, the trial court shall not proceed with :3: the trial for a period of four weeks. 6. If the revision is preferred within four weeks, delay, if any, in preferring the revision be condoned. On the necessary revision being preferred by the petitioner before the concerned Sessions Court, the concerned Sessions Court shall dispose of the matter on merits after hearing the necessary parties. 7. Criminal Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Smt.V.K. Tahilramani,J.) (Smt.V.K. Tahilramani,J.) (Smt.V.K. Tahilramani,J.)