SB Crlmb No.8004/10. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B.CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.8004/2010. Kallan @ Shravan & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order : August 25, 2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Dinesh Kala for the petitioners. Shri Peeyush Kumar Public Prosecutor for State. ****** Heard learned counsel for petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor for State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for petitioners is that dispute is between two neighbours, who are closely related to each other. There are three injuries from the side of the injured and all are simple in nature. There are also two injured from the side of the accsused petitioners, who have also received simple injuries. Vinod Kumar against whom there are main allegations, has already been released on bail u/S.439 Cr.P.C. by this Court on consideration of this fact vide order dated 27/7/2010 passed in S.B.Cr.Misc.Bail Application No.6714/2010. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application but he is not in a position to controvert the factual submissions made above. Having regard to the facts aforesaid and SB Crlmb No.8004/10. 2 considering all other facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to extend the benefit of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners. In the result, this anticipatory bail application u/S.438 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioners Kallan @ Shravan S/o Shri Babu Lal and Rajesh S/o Shri Babu Lal, they be released by the S.H.O./I.O. in F.I.R. No.130/2010 P.S. Subhash Chouk, Jaipur for offence u/Ss.143, 323 and 307 IPC, on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to his satisfaction with the following conditions: 1. that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; 2. that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and 3. that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil