(L^ \cr. G) IN THE HON'BLE HIG H COU RTOF CHHATTISGARH w PETITIONER AT BILASPUR .P.fSl N0. 3^2-^, /201KS B.) Suniti Bai - Baiga W/o Shri S&nj^y ffAi'^K , aged about 35 years, Caste- Baiga, Working as Shiksha Karmi Grade-3, Govt. Primary School, Mukundpur, Block- Masturi, District- Bilaspur (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^y' ^.^-^' . .^*' ^.A?*'"" <>^v ^" 2. State of Chhattisgarh Through :- the Secretary, Department of Panchayat & Rural Development, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Caste Scrutiny Committee, Pandit Ravishanker Vishvavidyalaya Parisar Raipur, Distt.-Raipur (C.G.). 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Masturi, District- Bilaspur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS As mentioned in the cause title above. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS As mentioned in the cause title above. -3, PARTICULARS^OF THE ORDER AGAINST^/VHICH HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker) Writ Petition fSI No. 3Q2@ of 2011 PETtIIQNER Suniti Bai Baiga VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh and others Shri Rishi Rahu) Soni, counset for the petitioner. Shri Y. S. Thakur, Dy. A.G. for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE .CQNSTrTVTION. OUM.DXA Grievance of the petltioner js that Government authorities are asking him to get hls csste certsficate verified from the High Power Caste Scrutiny Committee (for short 'the Committee') but the said Committee is neither issuing a requisite form to him nor is responding in any manner. Counsel for the petitioner submits that on the one hand the Committee is not entertainina the petitioner and on the other hand a threat is being given by the department to take disciplinary action against him. 2. Learned State counsel fairly submlts that the Committee would entertain the case of the petitioner and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. He submits that the Commlttee will also issue the requisite form in favour of the petitioner if he approaches the authority wlthin the time frame. 3. In view of the submission made by the counsel for the State,. the petition is djsposed of wlth a directlon to the .-»- petitioner to approach the Committee within 15 days from today and in turn the said Committee will jssue requislte form to the petitioner which would be submitted by him within further a period of one week and thereafter the Committee shall examine the matter and pass an approprlate order within further period of five months. Needless to say that due co- operation shall be offered by the parties for early disposal of case by the Committee. Tlll next slx months, the department will not take any coercive step against the petitioner for not submitting the caste certlficate issued by the Committee. Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge