IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 45 OF 2011 IN STAMP NUMBER MAIN NO. 3862 OF 2009 STATE ... Applicant Versus RAJANISH SINGH @ RAJU BHAYAM BHAGEL AND ANR., ... Respondents Shri S. R. Rivonkar, Special Public Prosecutor for the Applicant/State. Shri M. Teles, Advocate for the Respondents. Coram:- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 27th April, 2011 P.C.:- Having heard the learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the State and the learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents and with their assistance perusing the Judgment and Order of acquittal, we are of the opinion that there is substance in the contentions of the learned Special Public Prosecutor. Prima facie, whether the conclusions recorded in para 53 of the impugned Order are justified in the light of the oral and documentary evidence or not, needs further scrutiny. Hence, leave to file Appeal deserves to be granted. The application seeking leave is therefore granted. Appeal is admitted. The authorities to initiate action under Section 390 Cr.P.C. S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. F. M. REIS, J. RD.