1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Eleventh day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.9977 of 2011 (**)AMUN ALIAS RAMACHANDRAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VEERAVANALLUR POLICE STATION TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT CR.NO.151/2010 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. AR. JEYARHUTHRAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused No.1 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294 (b), 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.151 of 2010 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was charged under Sections 294(b), 506(ii) of IPC and the alleged occurrence has been taken place on 11.07.2010 and investigation is considerably over and now he apprehend for arrest hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.side) would submit that investigation is over and charge sheet has been filed and the petitioner has been shown as absconding accused and Non Bailable Warrant has been issued and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4.Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and a perusal of the report of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 Cheranmahadevi, it could be seen that the petitioner has been shown as absconding accused and charge sheet has been filed on 6.7.2011 and taken on file in C.C.No.285 of 2010 and since accused persons were not enlarged on bail, Non Bailable Warrant has been issued and pending before the concerned court. Hence, the petitioner is directed to surrender himself before the learned Magistrate and to file an application for bail and in the event of filing such an application, the concerned Magistrate is directed to consider the bail application on the same day on merits. 5.With the aforesaid direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. sd/- 11/08/2011 (**)AMENDED AS PER THE ORDERS OF HON'BLE COURT' MADE IN MP(MD)1/2011 IN CRL.OP(MD)NO.9977/2011 VIDE ITS ORDER DTED 14.11.2011 BY VPKJ / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, CHERANMAHADEVI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VEERAVANALLUR POLICE STATION TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. AR. JEYARHUTHRAN Advocate SR.No.39534 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9977 of 2011 Date :11/08/2011 TR: 16.08.2011 : 2P/6C rl/6c – 16.11.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/