— ^ c ,f \°al .-..n^U ^^^lf R.'::,^^.^, IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPl JR WRITPETITIONNO. 5'J-1^ /2005 PETITIONER ^" Gaind Ram Sahu, S/o Sliri Maiigal Ruiii Sahu, aged 41 years, Occupation- Service, working as Assistant 1 cacliyr in Govemment Brijraj Middle School, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.) RESPONDENTS .>.A -VERSUS- / 1. ^:^' .A^7"o^ G^ , 3. /4. State ofChhattisgarh through Secretary, Scheduled Caslc, Scheduled Tribe and othcr Backward Classes Wcirarc Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur (C.d.) Joint Director, Schcdiiled Castc, Scheduled Tribe and othcr • Backward Classes Wclfarc Department, Raipur (C.G.) District Organizer, 'I ribal Welfare,Raipur(C.G.) Divisional Joint Director, Aiidit & Accounts, Raipur (C.Cj.) Block Education Officcr, Mahasamund (C.G.) f' . WRJT UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDJAii.QR ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE WRIT.^RDERS OR DIRECTION. Theahove-jiam^^^^^-— 'ffi^"9 ©:) HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BIUSPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. S^TESH K. A6NIHOTRL J. Petitioner Respondents WRrr pETmoN NO. 577 OF 2005 Pramod Kumar Kannoje yersus The State of dhattisgarh and others And Petitioner WRTT PETTTION N0. 5116 OF 2005 Gamd Ram Sahu versus Resoondents 5tate of Chhattisgarh and o-t+iers Present : Mr, Indrasen Sahu, counsel for the petjtioners, Mr< Arun 5oo, Goyemment Advoo3ite for the State/ re^pondents, ORDER (Passed on -this 22nd day of December, 2006) 1. Leamedl counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as leamed Sovemment Advocote c^pearing for the reqpondents/State jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petitions are squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of YashwQnt KutRar Bharadwaj vs. Mws'cipal Cwpwation, Owy and anothei^ . 2. For the aforeroentioned rea«>ns,-tfie writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of Ya^iwanf Kumar Bharadwaj^S^ro^. subject to verification of the fact as to whetiier the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.TJ. Cert-ificates at tiieir own e?q)enses as per the circuJars dated 24-12-1998 and l-3-1999 and further whether they have been (Wtid two osdvosnoe. increroents or not.No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on the record of the connected < writ petitjons. -^—— Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Bablu 1 2006ai5^PJR-C^96