IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29655 of 2010 1. GOBARDHAN CHOUDHARY SON OF RAM KAWAL CHOUDHARY 2. CHHOTAK KUMAR SON OF AKSHAY LAL PRASAD @ AKCHHAY LAL PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 3.9.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioners are in custody since 5.4.2010, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhabhua (Kaimur) in Mohaniya P.S.case No.114 of 2010, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors shall be local since the petitioners belong to Buxar district and the second bailor will be the father/brother of the petitioner, (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iii) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be - 2 - cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iv) that the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )