IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3032 of 2011 1. RAWANI ANSARI, SON OF SARFUDDIN ANSARI. 2. PRAMOD NETUA@ PRAMOD KUMAR, SON OF WAKIL NETUA@ WAKIL RAM, BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BALIGAON, MOMINPURTOLA, P.S.- RAJPUR, DISTRICT- ROHTAS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . with Cr.Misc. No.3429 of 2011 MAHANGU ANSARI @ ALISHER ANSARI , SON OF NOOR HASAN ANSARI, RESIDENT OF BALIGAON, P.O. RAJANDIH, P.S. RAJPUR, DISTRICT, ROHTAS, AT SASARAM. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 14.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. According to the prosecution case the alleged, occurrence took place on 24.6.2010 and admittedly, the written report was filed on 8.7.2010. Both petitioners are named in the First Information Report but impugned order of learned Additional Sessions Judge Rohtas at Sasaram reflects that none of the person has seen the petitioners taking away the victim boy. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioners named above be released on bail on 2 furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj Rohtas in connection with Nashriganj (Rajpur) P.S. Case No. 109 of 2010. Devendra/ ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)