IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11976 of 2010 JANAKI SHARAN SINGH SON OF LATE RAM CHANDRA SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHHATA, P.S. MASAURHI, DISTRICT- PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF IRRIGATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, ANISABAD, PATNA 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, RUPANKAN DIVISION NO.1, DEPARTMENT OF IRRIGATION, ANISABAD, PATNA-2 4. THE DIRECTOR, REVENUE ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES, PATNA ----------- 2 04.08.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that prior to his regularization in the services of the State petitioner was working as an employee under the Work Charge Establishment, however by office order n. 3382 dated 11.06.2007 (Annexure-6) the services of the petitioner was regularized. Learned counsel further submitted that on perusal of the decision of the State Government as contained in memo no. 3058 dated 20th October, 1984 (Annexure-5) the total service has to be taken into consideration i.e. the period spent in the work charge establishment as well as the period after regularization in the State and taking both the qualifying service for fixing the pension has to be calculated. However, the same having not done the case of the petitioner has been rejected vide Annexure-4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State submits that the aforesaid decision of the State Government contained in Annexure-5 needs to be verified with respect to the claim of the petitioner since the petitioner while filing representation pursuant to the previous order of this Court did not bring the aforesaid decision to the notice of the concerned authority which he has brought before this Court. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.3. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim including the decision of the State Government contained in memo no. 3058 dated 20th October, 1984 (Annexure-5), the representation of the petitioner shall be considered and disposed of by a reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. It is further made clear that till disposal of the representation, the order as contained in Annexure-4 shall be kept in abeyance. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)