IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M-34270 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 19.1.2011 ... Soni ................Petitioner vs. State of Punjab .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. D.S. Malwai, Advocate for the petitioner Sh. S. S. Bhinder, Senior Additional Advocate General with Sh. Amandeep Singh Rai, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. ... K.C. Puri, J. As per allegation of the prosecution, 280 kgs of poppy husk has been recovered. Where as the petitioner is stated to have ran away from the spot and he has been identified by ASI Surinder Pal. The quantity recovered is commercial in nature. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on account of a writ petition. However, that contention cannot be accepted at this stage. So, no ground for grant of bail is made out. Consequently, the petition stands dismissed. ( K.C. Puri ) 19.1.2011 Judge chugh