IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.30395 of 2009 ***** 1. Amrendra Paswan son of Bhikhari Paswan 2. Meghnath Paswan son of Hiralal Paswn Both resident of village belmohan, P.S. Phulparas, District-Madhubani. …. …. Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar …. …. Opposite party ----------- 3. 17.11.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. It is stated on behalf of the petitioners that their name did not figure in the F.I.R. and the charge-sheet has been filed against them only on the basis of hypothesis instead of substantive evidence. Learned counsel representing the State, however, submits that the police managed to have a breakthrough during the course of investigation on the basis of the use of a mobile looted in the dacoity and later on confessional statement was recorded and based on the same certain recoveries have come to be made. It is further stated that the petitioner no.1 has criminal antecedent and there are three cases of similar nature coming against him though it is not disputed that the petitioner no.2 does not have any criminal history but looking at the seriousness of the crime and the material, prayer for bail of the petitioners are hereby rejected. If the trial does not proceed within the next year then the petitioner no.2 may have the liberty to approach this Court. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)