1 2112mca1177.11.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Misc. Civil Application No.1177 of 2011 In Writ Petition No.4720 of 2006 (Decided) (Vishambhar s/o Gopvindrao Garud v. Shri Shivaji Education Society, Pusad, Distt. Yavatmal, through its President, and others) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri Anand Parchure, Advocate for Applicant. Shri J.B. Jaiswal, AGP for Non-Applicant Nos.3 and 4. Coram : R.K. Deshpande, J. Dated : 21 st December, 2011 Two grounds are raised for seeking review of the judgment dated 25-11-2011 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.4720 of 2006, viz. (i) that the rule construed by this Court in the judgment is not the correct rule, and (ii) that the rule has been misconstrued or misread by this Court. With the assistance of the learned counsel appearing for the applicant, I have gone through the rule reproduced in the judgment and the rule reproduced in para 2 of the application. The learned counsel for the applicant could not point out any difference in both the rules. In fact the rule considered in the judgment and the rule quoted in para 2 of the application is one 2 2112mca1177.11.odt and the same. Hence, there is no question of misreading the rule or considering the different rule altogether. So far as the interpretation of the rule is concerned, this Court has already taken a view and merely because some other interpretation is possible, that cannot be a ground for review. In view of above, the review application is dismissed. Judge pdl