IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.677 of 2010. Decided on: 9.3.2010. Naresh Sehgal. ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & ors. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Avinash Jaryal, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Addl. Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) CMP No. 995 of 2010. Allowed. The application is disposed of. CWP No. 677 of 2010. The petitioner has filed the writ petition with the following prayers; “ (a) That the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned order dated 2.3.2010 annexed with this petition as Annexure P- 1, by way of issuance of writ of certiorari. (b) That the respondents be directed to allow the petitioner to continue to perform his duties at Govt. Primary School Singi, by way of issuance of writ of mandamus.” -2- Going by the allegations, it appears that the matter has to be looked into by the second respondent since there appears to be, prima facie, a violation of the rationalization Scheme at least in the case of the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of as follows. The petitioner may immediately file an appropriate representation before the second respondent alongwith a copy of this Writ Petition and a copy of the judgment. The second respondent shall look into the matter with notice to the petitioner and 5th respondent and pass appropriate orders thereon within a period of one month from today. The implementation of the impugned order shall be deferred till such time. With these observations, the petition stands disposed of so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice March 9, 2010 ( Justice R.B.Misra ), (tr) Judge.