IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARI-I 1‘3 Ary/ 2006 ETITIONE «v ¢> /' Shriram Sai S/o Late Duhaiam WRIT PETITION NO‘ 4; aged about 62 years, R/o Village- Pongro, Tahsil— Bagicha, Distt— Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of ,Chhatisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Panchayat 85 Samaj Kalyan, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur.(C.G.) éESPONDENTS a 2. Accountant General of Chhattisgarh, Pandri, ’ Near Bus Stand District —Raipur (C.G.) (z / 3. Additional Assistant development Commissioner , Vikash Khand — Pathalgaon, Disst.— Jashpur (C.G.) f 4. Joint Director Treasury,Accountants 85 Pension Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G) 2/ I t WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA pR: . W XI~HC-78 / // i mumm 200 g K4 UP mmwafawr) WWW WW§WW WWW mmmm kmm x 23-6-2006 Mr. Sanjay AgrawaL coun ‘ l for the petitioner. , Mr. A,S. Kachhawaha, ovt. Advocate for the Shte/respo’ndenw No.1, 3 and 4. Miss Sharmila Singhai, Ce tral Govt. Counsel for respondent N02. Heard. The main grievance of the etitioner in this writ petition is that he is not being paid Final payment of GPF, whereas he demitted the office on attaining the age of superannuation on m Aprii, 2003. Peruse! of Annexure P‘1 shows that the Additional Assista t Development Commissioner, Pathaigaon, District: Jashpur wrote a letter the Accountant General, Chhattisgarh, I Raipur, on 5-1 1-2003 that th pass book containing entries of GPF deductions was sent and it was requested that final payment in respect of ’ GPF amount Rs.1 ,28,947/- be directed to be paid to the petitioner. Thereafter, on 25-2-2004 a remi er was sent and it appears that thereafter, a clarification was sought vide letter dated 4—7-2004 by the Accountant General Office and reply of the s me was vide letter dated 10-9-2004, even WT $33 then the payment is not made. ln the circumstances. res ndent No.2 is directed to consider the case ‘ of the petitioner regarding final p yment of GPF and decide the same within a period of two months from the d te of receipt of a copy of this order, faiiing which the petitioner shall be entitl to approach the Court again. With the direction aforesaid the petition stands disposed of. Parties are entitled for cert' copy of this order. Sdl— > L.C. Bhadoo some Judge