• `.`..`.` -- Serial No. of Order Date of Order 24.02.2009 Orders iJfj,tsh signature Office Note as to action (iJ any) taken on order Present: Mr. A. Moulik, Senior Advocate with Mr. N. G. Sherpa, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. Karma Thinlay, Government Advocate with Mr. D. K. Siwakoti, Advocate for the State- Respondents. At the very outset, Mr. A. Moulik, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners came up with a prayer to allow the petitioners to withdraw the writ petition. A copy of the application fired by the petitioners in this regard has been served on the learned Government: Advocate. Heard. The main ground for seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition as mentioned in the petition is that the petitioners have been reinstated .as Sanskrit post graduate teachers/graduate teachers on co-terminus basis in a separate scheme called `Rashtriya Sanskrit Sansthan'. The petitioners also seek libert:y to file a fresh petition, if so advised, in future. The learned Government Advocate has no objection if the petition is allowed subject .to the condition that the petitioners shall have liberty to file a fresh petition only if law permits. In view of the above, the writ petitioners are allowed to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action if permissible under the law. This writ petition st:ands disposed of as withdrawn. (Jus e A. P. Subba ) Acting Chief Justice