HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4531 of 2010 Date : 08.10.2010 Between : Jagathi Finance Corporation (Regd.), Warangal, rep. by its Partner. …..Petitioner And Lingampally Govinda Reddy (died per LRs.) & others. …..Respondents HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4531 of 2010 ORDER : This civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the plaintiff in the suit in O.S.No.132 of 2006 on the file of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Warangal, being aggrieved by the order, dated 14.06.2010, passed in I.A.No.774 of 2006 in the said suit. The aforesaid suit was filed by the petitioner/plaintiff for recovery of money. It was posted for appearance on 12.06.2006. On the ground that there was no representation on the aforesaid date, it was posted to 19.06.2006, and thereafter, it was decreed exparte. The respondents have filed an application in I.A.No.774 of 2006 under Order 9 Rule 13 of CPC, seeking to set aside the exparte decree, dated 19.06.2006. The Court below, by the impugned order, taking into account the fact that the petition was filed within 7 days, and also in view of the reasons assigned in the affidavit, has allowed the said I.A., and set aside the exparte decree on payment of costs of Rs.1,000/- and also on deposit of suit costs into Court, and further, subject to the condition of filing written statement before a particular date. Though it is submitted by the learned counsel for petitioner that there was no sufficient reason to set aside the exparte decree, in the affidavit filed in support of I.A.No.774 of 2006, it is stated by the petitioner No.3 that they were not in the house and were in Hyderabad along with their ailing mother, who was undergoing treatment. In view of the said ground mentioned in the affidavit filed in support of I.A.No.774 of 2006, I do not find any ground to interfere with the discretion exercised by the Court below. For the aforesaid reasons, the revision is dismissed. However, as the suit is of 2006, it may be disposed of as early as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 8th October 2010 ajr