IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL (LODG) NO. 883 OF 2006 (LODG) NO. 883 OF 2006 (LODG) NO. 883 OF 2006 IN IN IN ARBITRATION ARBITRATION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 324 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 324 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 324 OF 2006 Shyam Chimandas Khilnani ] .. Appellant (Ori.Petnr.No.1) Versus 1. M/s. Raha Enterprises & Anr. ] .. Respondents (Ori.Res.1 & 2) Mr. Manisha Virkhare i/b Mr. Bhavesh Parmar for the appellant. Mr. Viraj Maniyar for the respondent No.1. CORAM: R.M. LODHA, & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED: 10TH NOVEMBER, 2006 P.C. : . The counsel for the appellant submits that the present Appeal was preferred without copy of the impugned order. Now, since copy of the order has been received, Memo of Appeal needs to be substantially changed. In this view of the matter, appellant desires to withdraw this Appeal with liberty to file fresh Appeal against the impugned order. : 2 : 2. For the stated reason, Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed. Sd/- [R.M. [R.M. [R.M. LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] Sd/- [J.H. [J.H. [J.H. BHATIA, J.] BHATIA, J.] BHATIA, J.]