IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3479 of 2010 RAM SAKAL RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 01.02.2010 Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail in a case instituted under sections 409,420 and 504/34 IPC. It is alleged that the petitioner connived with the Branch Manager and got a sum of Rs.45, 000/- withdrawn from the account of the complainant This amount was allegedly sanctioned as loan to the complainant. Subsequently, on getting notice from the Bank, it came to the knowledge of the complainant that the loan was advanced to him on the strength of certain documents allegedly got signed by the present petitioner and the co-accused(Branch Manager). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is prepared to deposit a sum of Rs. 20,000/- in the Court and he may be granted the privilege of anticipatory bail. It is contended that the said deposit may be without prejudice to the right/claim and defence in the case. Having regard to the said submissions, this Court is persuaded to grant the petitioner the privilege of anticipatory bail. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner abovenamed, in the event of arrest/surrender within - 2 - four weeks from today, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10, 000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM, Samastipur in connection with Musrigharari P.S. Case No. 83 of 2008 subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. with further condition that the petitioner shall furnish the receipt of payment of sum of Rs.20,000/- along with the bail bonds. HR ( Kishore K. Mandal )