IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3880 of 2000 Between: 1 G.Venkateshwara Reddy S/o G. Chinakonda Reddy R/o Cuddapah District. 2 P.Srinivasulu S/o P. Venkata Swamy R/o Cuddapah District. 3 P.Venkatesu S/o P. Subbaramaiah R/o Cuddapah District. 4 Smt. G.Naganjali D/o G. Venkata Subbaiah R/o Cuddapah District. 5 Karnati Ramakrishna Reddy S/o K.Linga Reddy R/o Cuddapah District. 6 Gati Ramakrishna S/o G. Koteswara Rao R/o Cuddapah District. 7 G. Subramanyam S/o G. Subbaraiah R/o Cuddapah District. 8 T. Prasad S/o T.Sanjeevaiah R/o Cuddapah District. 9 B. Ramanjaneyulu S/o B. Subbaiah R/o Cuddapah District. 10 Pilli Raj Kumar S/o P. Rajaratnam R/o Cuddapah District. 11 Dasari Ramakumari D/o D. Peramma, R/o Cuddapah District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Chairman, A.P. Transco, Vidyuth Soudha, Khairatabad, Hyderabad. 2 Superintending Engineer, T.L.C. Circle, A.P.Transco, Vidyuth Bhavan, Cuddapah. 3 Chief Engineer, T.L.& S.S., AP TRANSCO, Cuddapah. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction to direct the respondents to absorb the petitioners in accordance with the B.P.Ms.36 dt.18.5.1997 without rejecting their cases on the ground that they worked under unlicenced contractor and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.V.SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondents: MR.G.VIDYASAGAR The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3880 OF 2000 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _________________________ JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY 29th January, 2009 IBL