BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Fifth day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.11112 of 2011 1. RAMANATHAN 2. KARUPPAYEE 3. THAVAPANDI 4. BALAJI 5. VENNILA 6. SHANTHI 7. GANESH 8. VINOTHKUMAR ... PETITIONERS Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, USILAMPATTI TOWN POLICE STATION. (IN CRIME NO. --- OF 2011) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. N.ANANTHAPADMANABAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/accused apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 323 and 506(i) IPC in Crime No.500 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that after filing of the application a case has been registered on 02.08.2011 against the petitioners under Sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 323 and 506 (i) IPC in Crime No.500 of 2011. He further submits that the alleged occurrence took place on 16.04.2011 and the case has been registered on 02.08.2011 and the investigation is considerably over and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3. The learned counsel for the intervenor would submits that the occurrence took place on 16.04.2011 and the case has not been taken on file hence, he preferred a private complaint and the investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.side) would submit https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ that the investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 5. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and the alleged occurrence took place on 16.04.2011 and the injured treated as out-patient and also considering the fact that though the petitioners were not arrested, they neither interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Usilampatti and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 5. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 25/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, USILAMPATTI. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, USILAMPATTI TOWN POLICE STATION. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC TO M/S. N.ANANTHAPADMANABAN ADVOCATE SR.NO.29115 +1CC TO M/S.E.V.N.SIVA, COUNSEL FOR INTERVENOR SR.29076 SR : 26.08.2011 : 2p/7c ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11112 of 2011 Date :25/08/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/