1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.242 OF 2002 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders. Mr.R.S.Ghadge i/b A.S.Desai for the petitioners. Mr.Vijay Patilo for respondent nos.1 to 22. CORAM : V.M.KANADE, J. DATED : 02/02/2011 PC: 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioners. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioners is that undertaking given by the respondents to this court in the consent terms has not been complied by them. Mr.Vijay Patil, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the land which was offerred by the respondents to the petitioners was not accepted by them. He submitted that, therefore, civil application was filed by the S 2 Karkhana for relieving them of the undertaking given to this court. He submitted that the said civil application was allowed and the Karkhana was relieved of the said undertaking which was given by them in this court. He, however, submitted that some of the petitioners have preferred S.L.P. against the said order, however, no stay has been granted by the Supreme Court to the order passed by this court relieving the Karkhana from the said undertaking. In this view of the matter, therefore, in my view contempt as alleged by the petitioners is not committed by the Karkhana. The petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged. (V.M.KANADE, J.)