IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1325 of 2010 RANJEET PASWAN SON OF JAGESHWAR PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 28/01/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307, 353, 332, 333, 504, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Taking into consideration the fact that in an unfortunate situation in which the accused persons obstructed the prosecution from taking possession over a Pond, one of the accused persons lost his life and some were injured but from the facts of the case, the submission is that it could not be a case under Section 307 I.P.C., let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 1.12.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, in connection with Araria (Tarabari) P.S. Case No. 66 of 1999 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature 2 after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)