IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC NO.8937 OF 1996 LAXMI DEVI, WIFE OF SHRI RAMU YADAV, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA MURARPUR, POLICE STATION CIVIL LINES, TOWN AND DISTRICT GAYA VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE ADDITIONAL MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE COLLECTOR, GAYA 4. THE L.R.D.C., GAYA 5. MOST. BIGRI DEVI, WIDOW OF LATE SIBBAN YADAV 6. RAJU YADAV, SON OF SIBBAN YADAV 7. ROHANI DEVI, DAUGHTER OF LATE SIBBAN YADAV 5 TO 7 ARE RESIDENT OF MOHALLA MURARPUR, POLICE STATION CIVIL LINES, DISTRICT GAYA 8. SHAMBHU SHARAN 9. BHISHM PRASAD 8 AND 9 ARE SONS OF LATE HARIHAR PRASAD, RESIDENT OF MURARPUR, POLICE STATION CIVIL LINES, DISTRICT GAYA AT APRESENT RESIDING AT MOHALLA SALIMPUR AHARA, POLICE STATION KADAMKUAN, DISTRICT PATNA ………………………………………………………………………………….RESPONDENTS ******* 9 08/11/2010 This writ application was filed challenging the orders dated 13.12.1995, 22.06.1993 and 03.11.1987 in a pre-emption matter under the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1962. I.A. No. 1056 of 2010 has been filed stating therein that the petitioner and the respondents 6 and 7 have compromised the matter outside the Court and do not wish to pursue this writ application. The terms of compromise are mentioned as paragraph 3 of the interlocutory application, which are as follows:- 2 “(a) That respondent no. 6 and 7 do not want to pursue the pre-emption application any further and want to withdraw the pre-emption application and accordingly the pre-emption application be withdrawn. (b) That the amount deposited in the court of L.R.D.C., Gaya shall be withdrawn by respondent no. 6 Raju Yadav for himself and for respondent no. 7 also. (c)That the parties shall bear their own cost. (d) That the order dated 3.11.87 passed by the L.R.D.C., Gaya in Ceiling Case No. 31 of 1986-87 be set aside.” Considering the joint prayer of the parties, to withdraw the writ application in terms of the aforesaid compromise, the I.A. application is allowed. The writ petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ application, considering that the parties have compromised the case outside the Court. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )