IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4457 of 2009 Between: K.Ramachandra Naidh ..... PETITIONER AND K.Chandrasekhar Naidh and 6 others .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4457 of 2009 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article-227 of the Constitution of India aggrieved by the order of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Chittoor dated 31.07.2007 in I.A.529/2008 in O.S.211/2002 by the 3rd defendant in the suit. The plaintiffs filed the said I.A. for appointment of Advocate- Commissioner to inspect the suit locality and to note down the physical features of the suit schedule property such as existing crops, ridges, wells and if any continuing cart track or foot path in the suit schedule property. The said petition was allowed appointing the Advocate- Commissioner to note down the physical features alone with regard to existing crops, ridges, wells and if any continuing cart track or foot path in the petition schedule property and further directed to execute the warrant after giving notice to both the parties. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Advocate- Commissioner is contemplating to measure and gather the evidence. I do not see any such direction given by the Court below entitling the Advocate-Commissioner to measure and gather any evidence about the existing features. He was directed to note down the physical features of the petition schedule property alone and report the same. I do not see any illegality or otherwise to interfere with the order of the Court below in appointing the Advocate-Commissioner to note down the physical features of the petition schedule property alone. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 11.02.2010 Dsr