IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY , THE ELEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 929 of 2004 Between: M/s. Sri Sai Asbestos ( India ) Private Limited A Company incorporated under the Provisions of the Indian Companies Act, 1956, having its Registered office at 3-4-551, Ground Floor, Aruna Arcade, Narayanaguda, Hyderabad, rep., by its Managing Director T. Raghav Reddy S/o. Narasimha Reddy, r/o.Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of A.P.,rep., by its Secretary to Government, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Engineer-in-Chief, Panchayat Raj Engineering Department S.R.T.G.N. Bhavan, Errummanzil Colony, Hyderabad. 3 The Chief Engineer, Rural Water Supply, Panchayat Raj Engineering Department, Hyderabad. 4 The Superintending Engineer, Rural Water Supply Projects, Panchayat Raj, Vijayawada. 5 Executive Engineer, Rural Water Supply, Vijayawada. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an Order or Direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari by quashing the impugned Order dated 21.11.2003 bearing proceedings No.T4/12099/2002, issued by the 2nd resposndent as illegal, arbitrary, without any authority of law, contrary to the Rules contained in G.O.Ms.No.521, against the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14,19 and 19[1][g] of the Constitution of India and consequently setaside the order dated 16.4.2003 issued by the 1st respondent in deciding and directing the 2nd respondent to black list the petitioner herein, while declaring that the petitioner company is entitle to be on the roles of list of class-1 (Civil) Contractors to participate in all the contracts. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.PURUSHOTHAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent : GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. FOR R1 TO 4 The Court made the following : Oral order: There is no representation on behalf of both the parties when the matter is taken up for hearing. The writ petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 11th April, 2008 GRR To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies