IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 1ST SEPTEMBER 2008 / 10TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 11737 of 2006(V) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- CHINNAMMA SCARIA, EDASSERY HOUSE, KAITHACHIRA P.O., MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.K.R.VINOD SRI.N.SATHEESH RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY, TALUK OFFICE MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD. 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRIC SUB DIVISION, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, MANNARKKAD. 3. THE AGRICULTURE OFFICER, KRISHNABHAVAN, MANNARKKADU PANCHAYATH. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MANNARKKADU, PALAKKAD. 5. MR.BABY, S/O. JOHN, MOODAKKOTTIL VEEDU, APPAKKADU, THENKARA P.O. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. NOBLE MATHEW THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/09/2008 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 11737 of 2006(V) -2- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 - THE PHOTOCOPY OF THE INVOICE CARD DATED 7.1.98, EXT.P2 - A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 13.3.2004 ISSUED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P3 - A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 29.3.2004 ISSUED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P4 - A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICED DATED 8.9.2005 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P5 - THE PHOTOCOPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE PRIOR TO ATTACHED OF THE LAND DATED 8.9.2005 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P6 - THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ON W.P.(C) NO. 32785/2005. EXT.P7 - THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM NO. 272/2006. EXT.P8 - THE PHOTOCOPY OF THE I.A. NO. 492/2006. EXT.P9 - THE KACHEET DATED 28.3.2006. /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE rhs KURIAN JOSEPH, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.11737 OF 2006 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of September, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioner is aggrieved by the steps taken for recovery of electricity dues. The main grievance is that petitioner has not been furnished with a true statement of accounts. There is already an interim order dated 25.04.2006 directing the petitioner to remit Rs.7,500/- . 2. There will be a direction to the second respondent to furnish true statement of accounts to the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment and in case there is any dispute on the statement furnished by the second respondent, it will be open to the petitioner to pursue her statutory remedy. In order to enable the petitioner to workout the relief as above, interim order referred to above will continue for a period of six months and the fate of the steps taken by the petitioner pursuant to the interim order will depend on the action pursued by the petitioner. This writ petition is disposed of as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. smp KURIAN JOSEPH, J. W.P.(C) No. 11737 OF 2006 J U D G M E N T 01.09.2008