IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2783 of 2011 DINESH MALAKAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 15.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. There is specific allegation against the petitioner that he opened fire causing fire-arm injury to the informant. The impugned order of learned Additional Sessions Judge reveals that the informant has received grievous injury on his vital part of the body. Although learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged occurrence took place in course of an altercation which arose between the parties on account of using of sub-standard materials in a construction work by brother of the informant but I am not at all convinced with the above-said submission. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail if the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within nine months by Additional Sessions Judge-(F.T.C. No.III), Nalanda in connection with Sessions Trial No. 874 of 2010 arising out of Bihar P.S. Case No. 136 of 2010. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)