Cr.M.P.(M) No. 931 of 2009 17.12.2009 Present: Mr. Vishal Panwar, counsel for the petitioner. Mrs. Shubh Mahajan, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate General, for the respondent. It has been informed by the learned Assistant Advocate General that the learned Additional Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Court), Solan, has framed charge as against the petitioner and his co-accused under Sections 120-B, 302 and 201 I.P.C. Heard. I have gone through the police report. The main evidence collected as against the petitioner in regard to the recoveries effected under Section 27 of the Evidence Act of one mobile phone, one wrist watch and one multi midi card, which were allegedly recovered near the house of the petitioner from the fields. These were identified by the deceased’s brother being belonging to the deceased. Keeping in view the fact that there is some evidence as against the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the petitioner does not deserve to be released on bail at this stage. The application filed by the petitioner for grant of bail is accordingly rejected. December 17, 2009. ( V.K. Ahuja ), J. (BSS)