CR No.3615 of 2009 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3615 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 09, 2009 Manjit Singh ...........Petitioner Versus Darshan Singh ..........Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mrs.Justice Sabina Present: Mr.Sanjeev Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Arvind Rajotia,Advocate for the respondent -- Sabina, J. (oral) This revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is against the impugned order dated 6.6.2009 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) Patiala vide which the prayer for interim stay has been declined . Respondent Darshan Singh had filed a suit for specific performance of agreement to sell dated 14.11.2002. The said suit was decreed in exparte by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) Patiala vide judgment and decree dated 31.10.2006. Thereafter, respondent filed execution petition. Petitioner has filed application for setting aside the ex- parte decree dated 31.10.2006 under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure. An application was also filed for stay of execution proceedings and the said application was declined vide the impugned order dated 6.6.2009. Hence, the present revision petition. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the parties have agreed that a direction be issued to the trial Court to decide the application filed by the petitioner for setting aside the ex-parte decree CR No.3615 of 2009 (O&M) 2 within two months. The learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the respondent will not seek dispossession of the petitioner. In view of the statements made by the counsel for the parties, this revision petition is disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to dispose of the application filed by the petitioner seeking setting aside ex- parte judgment and decree dated 31.10.2006 under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure within two months from today. Respondent shall remain bound by the statement made by his counsel that till then he will not seek dispossession of the petitioner. ( Sabina ) Judge October 09, 2009 arya