IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 23429 of 2010 Date of decision : 21.04.2011 Ishar Ram and others ...Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. Vijay K. Jindal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Palwinder Singh, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab for respondent No.1. Mr. Vishwajit Bedi, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Mr. Balbir Singh Sewak, Advocate for respondent No.4. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned counsel has stated that respondent No.4 will not raise any construction over the property in dispute without prior approval/sanction of the respondent/Municipal Committee. In view of the above statement of counsel for respondent No.4, learned counsel for the petitioners intends to withdraw the instant writ petition. In this view of the matter, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. April 21, 2011 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) naresh.k Judge