... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.188 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.188 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.188 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.360 OF 2006 REVISION APPLICATION NO.360 OF 2006 REVISION APPLICATION NO.360 OF 2006 Shailesh Nathuram Kalothe ...Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Shri Vijay Gharat for the Applicant. Ms S.V.Gajare, A.P.P. for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : SEPTEMBER 28, 2006. : SEPTEMBER 28, 2006. : SEPTEMBER 28, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Rule. The learned A.P.P. waives service. Taken up for hearing forthwith. Revision Application has been admitted for final hearing. The Applicant was on bail throughout the trial and during the pendency of the appeal before the Sessions Court. 2. The substantive sentence is of three years. Considering the peculiar facts of the case and considering the fact that Revision is not likely to be heard before the period of sentence is over, a case is made out for grant of bail. Accordingly, Application is disposed of by passing following order: (i) The Applicant shall be enlarged on the same ... 2 ... bail on which he was enlarged during the pendency of the trial subject to filing fresh bail bonds. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE