DBCWP835/2005 // 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.835/2005 Union of India Vs. The Central Administrative Tribunal and Shree Kishan Goyal Date of Order ::: 19.10.2010 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri M.A. Khan, Counsel for petitioner #### By the Court:- This writ petition has been filed. Counsel on behalf of petitioner has submitted that there is subsequent event the respondent has been posted at Bhopal. In Paragraph 15 of the impugned order passed by respondent Central Administrative Tribunal there was direction to continue respondent employee as against post of Senior Accountant at Jaipur. The petitioner was also directed to consider posting of respondent employee as JAO at Ajmer against future available vacancy in terms of Para 2(a). It was also clarified by the Tribunal that respondent employee shall have preferential claim for his posting at Jaipur on transfer subsequently as and when the post of JAO fallen vacant at Jaipur without insisting on the condition of completion of three years tenure as stipulated in Para 2(b) of the offer of appointment to the post of JAO as stipulated in OM dated 10.12.2004. DBCWP835/2005 // 2 // In view of subsequent event which has taken place, the posting at Bhopal has been accepted by respondent employee. There is dilution of direction issued in Paragraph 15 of the order of the Tribunal. However, it is clarified, as prayed by counsel for petitioner, that said order may not be treated as precedent for other cases. Petition stands disposed of in terms indicated above. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. (Arun Mishra) J. //Jaiman//