‘ \ $9 $mGLE 8WCm BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P S No. M 0’ 2010 /:1 Jai Singh Rathore, S/o. Shri Photo Singh, aged about 38' years, Shikshakarmi Grade-III, Aadarsh Navin Primary School, Kharsiya, DistrictRaigarh(C.G.) PETITIONERS Singh S/o. Chhedilal Rathore, aged about 38 years, Shikshakarmi Grade-III, Pre Middle School Adarsh, District Raigarh (C.G.) . Balram Rathore, Kharsiya, Smt. Gargi Rathore, W/o. Mahendra ’ kas, t 3 yes, Shsaki dI, PrMiddl District Prah aged abou 5 ar ikharm Grae—II e-e Gi cl Kharsy, r .G. ksh ingh y So. M t, mi Gra' Gov. in Prar hol Hi. Moh hariya Rigar (C.G) Ara S, Rathia, / ohar Singh Rahiya Shikshakar de- III, t Nav imy Sco ar . Ks, District ah '. g / rls Shoo, ia Raigah (C), i f VERSUS mm k‘*‘Lh)(l\Q“’gl/” L“ 200 mm (Wu) WW3? mmm ‘ot the State. Counsel for the petitioners e permitted to withdrew this representation before the responc direction may be issued to t} representation so made, as expedi‘ Counsel for the State has r any representation and the same law. Accordingly, the petitioner petition with the liberty as afores representation by the petitioners the date of receipt of oopy of this the authority concerned Within a the date of said reoresentation. Wm§wm $W311é¥t B : HaN’BLE MR JU$TICE ?RI"I§KER‘DEMWAKER 0$9£Oi§ Shri Ra makant Pandey, counsel for the patitioners. Shri Pravean DaS, Dy. GA, Grievance of the. petitioners in the present petition is LLhat axer € completing of 12 years of service, the petitioners are entitled for higher post of Shiksha Karmi Grade—H but tiH date their case has not been considered. submits that at this stage he may petition with liberty to make ent No.7. He fuzther submits that ie resp. No.7 for deciding their :iously as possible. o objection if the petitioners makes Ls being decided in accordance with s are permitted to Withdraw this aid. In the eventuality of filing any within a period of one month from order, the same shailbe decided by further period of four months from It is made clear that thi on merits of the case and the aut may decide the representation in urt has not expressed any opinion ority concerned would, if so desire, ecordance with law. ‘Sdl- ritinker Diwaker Juge t S 2 b o s r P d