IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15700 of 2005 ARBIND KUMAR SINGH, SON OF LATE NAND KISHORE SINGH, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA CLUB ROAD NEAR CHAKBANDI OFFICE, P.O., P.S. & DISTT. AURANGABAD, (BIHAR) CONTRACTOR Of RAILWAY OUT AGENCY, AURANGABAD, P.O., P.S. & DISTRICT AURANGABAD………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF RAILWAY, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, RAILWAY BHAWAN, NEW DELHI. 2. THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF RAILWAY, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 3. THE RAILWAY BOARD THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, RAILWAY BHAWAN, NEW DELHI. 4. THE GENERAL MANAGER, EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY, HAJIPUR, VAISHALI. 5. THE CHIEF COMMERCIAL MANAGER, EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY, CHAMBER BHAWAN, 6TH FLOOR, J.C. ROAD,PATNA-1. 6. THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER, EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY, MUGALSARAI, (U.P.). 7. THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER, EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY, MUGALSARAI (U.P.). ………….RESPONDENTS. ---------------------------------- 02/ 26.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging order dated 25.07.2003 by which the Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, East Central Railway, Mugalsarai (respondent no.7) closed Aurangabad Out Agency without assigning any reason. 3. The petitioner claims to be a contractor of Out Agency, Aurangabad and seeks a further relief for allowing him to work as contractor. 4. It is quite apparent that the impugned order was - 2 - dated 25.07.2003 and this writ petition was filed more than two years thereafter on 21.12.2005. By order dated 18.08.2005 (Annexure-6) the Chief Commercial Manager had specifically observed that at present there was no proposal to open any Out Agency at Aurangabad. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there is no occasion for this court to interfere in such matter. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. Harish (S.N. Hussain, J.)