IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.454/2006 Jagannath Prasad S/o Shri Panna Lal ...defendant-appellant Versus Mandir Mahadevji situated at Village Kolari Tehsil Saipau through next friend Kailash Chand ...plaintiff-respondent AND Hariom S/o Shri Sita Ram & Others ...defendant-respondents Date of Order ::: 14.11.2006 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Anil Jain, Counsel for defendant-appellant #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the defendant- appellant. The plaintiff-respondent filed a suit for permanent injunction in the lower court in respect of the disputed property, which was decreed. The learned first appellate court has affirmed the finding of the lower court with slight modification in the finding in respect of issues no.1 and 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the defendant-appellant and after considering his submissions in the light of the findings of both the courts below I do not find any substantial question of law involved in this second appeal, which calls for any interference of this Court under Section 100 of the C.P.C., and the same is dismissed in limine. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//