IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.150 of 2009 ANIL SINGH S/O- LATE RAMASHISH SINGH, R/O- VILLAGE BOKNARIKHURD (CHHOTAKI BOKNARI), P.S.- MAKHDUMPUR, DISTRICT- JEHANABAD. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. RANVIJAY KUMAR SINGH, S/O- CHANDRAMNI SINGH, R/O- VILLAGE CHHOTAKI BOKNARI, P.S.-MUKHDUMPUR, DISTRICT- JEHANABAD. For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ----------- 2 15.09.2010 Petitioner assails order dated 17.1.2009 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-V, Jehanabad in S.T. no. 49 of 2006 whereby the application filed by the informant for recall/re-examination of witness under Section 311 has been allowed. Learned trial Court has found as under in the order impugned: “Here the informant appeared and stated he had no knowledge about the proceeding and prays to examine him. In my view he should be examined in the ends of justice. Taking into consideration the above facts and for the ends of justice, I allow the petition and direct the prosecution to get the informant and other examining witnesses examined as soon as possible. Put up on 30.01.2009 for evidence.“ This Court does not find any patent illegality and/or impropriety in the order meriting interference. There is no merit in this application. It is accordingly dismissed. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )