WRIT PETiTlON NQ: (E’etitign umigr artide ZZISI 22’? Wx PEIHIQNEE " wry @NXA' V .... F.-‘K/ .. _.. . I‘. ‘. "n . ." ‘ 6‘ . . .3 J..a/>’A VERSUS WRIT PETITION UNDER €§NSTITHTEDN OF INDIA FDR ARTICLE 2261227 OF THE WRITS ORDERS AND \/ Singlei‘ r \oc ' 5am£ C\’ ‘6% IN THE HIGE {IDURT OF JUEICATURE AT BILA$§UK {213‘ *&lzfm4 9f the Constitutian of lmiia) Gapal Pmsad 531m, aged abeut 41 years, 53/0 PM§Rm Salm, Amt. Emmi, G9“. Mdcile Schonl Bhen ' Magarlaad, Elisa. Bhamtari (CE) ISSUANCE OF APPRDPRIATE DIRECTQNS ETC. . ”1 Siam af Chhattiggiwh thmugh the Sametaty, ’ Gmmal §3zé$xmai3tmtimx depmnam, DES. Ehawan, Raipux, Cf}. 2} Bigtiict Educatian Qfikér, Dhamtaxi, Dhamiaij, {9&3} W " 5A 1 \‘i..»-§ FmipaL Gem Middle: Scham Emma, Magmload, Dim. Ehmntaii Cir w 4} ‘ ' Pxincipal, Gavi. Middlg School Banjzxri, Tamil Kmud,D1'3tt.DhmntarL QG. EW,W,W Wm @ Mr. Vishnu Koshta, counsel fc Mr. G.K. Beriwal, Deputy Advocate Genera! for the State/respondents. Heard both the counsei. :icie 226/227 of the Constitution of indie. aiity and propriety of orders dated 13-8. 2004 and 30.9-2004, whereby th petitioner, who is working as Assistant Teacher, has been transferred from Govt. Middle School, Magarlode to Govt. Middle Soho i, Banjari, Kurood, and also that the representation made by the petition r in pursuance of this Court‘s order has been rejected without assigning rea ons. The petitioner was working as Assistant Teacher of Middle Schooi, Bhendri, from where he was tran ferred by order dated 13-8-2004. The petitioner challenged the transfer, owever on the request of counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner was ailowe to make a representation to respondent No.2. However, the same was re cted vide order dated 30-9-2004. The case of the petitioner is that the p 'tioner was transferred without assignin any i’eaSOh. Reply has been fried on beh if of the State/respondents in which it has been mentioned that the petitione has been transferred on administrative eXIgency. > During the course of argu ents, learned counsel for the petitioner argued that after the transfer, ev n the petitioner has not been paid the salary, Whereas he was working co tinuously as Teacher. Moreover, he has Therefore. a direction be issued to the respondents to reinstate the petitio er and the petitioner is ready to comply with the order. By this writ petition under Ar the petitioner has questioned the Ie been piaced under suspension. r the petitioner. g wiP‘g Wm w 200 4— W mamawfga WWEWW $WW 19-4-2§05 XI—HC—22 \