IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 13TH JUNE 2008 / 23RD JYAISHTA 1930 W.P(C).No. 11539 of 2008(W) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- SHADIL SHABEER, MANGULAM HOUSE, MUTTADA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.ANIL SIVARAMAN SRI.HARIKRISHNAN RAVINDRAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SECRETARY, RTA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. P.R.PRATAP, T.C.14/6 18(1), MRA 195, KB AC, JUNCTION, NADAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR FOR R3 GOVT. PLEADER, SRI. K.V. MANOJ KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: =: 2 := WPC NO. 11539/2008-W A P P E N D I X EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE PREAMBLE OF THE DECISION OF THE RTA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, DATED29.12.1994. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 16.03.2008 // T R U E C O P Y // PA TO JUDGE RP/- ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 11539 OF 2008 W ==================== Dated this the 13th day of June, 2008 J U D G M E N T The petitioner complains of inaction on Ext.P2. According to him, Ext.P2 has been filed before the 1st respondent alleging violation of Ext.P1 in the issuance of permits to the 3rd respondent. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, Ext.P2 has been received, it is for the 1st respondent to take up and pass orders thereon. This the 1st respondent shall do, as expeditiously as possible at any rate within 8 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp