AB 370/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI This is an application made under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking pre-arrest bail by the petitioners, namely, 1) Md. Abdul Rouf, 2) Ataja Bibi, 3) Abdul Taleb, 4) A njuman Khatun, and 5) Hamida Begum, in connection with Bongaigaon Police Station Case No. 01 of 2011, under Sections 498(A)/380 IPC. Perused the above application and materials on record. Also perused the relevant Case Diary. Heard Mr. A. D. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Mr. B. S. Sinha, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. Considering the fact that the perusal of the Case Diary reveals sufficient incri minating materials against petitioner No.1, namely, Abdul Rouf, his prayer for p re-arrest bail is hereby rejected. The interim directions for pre-arrest bail, passed in this case, on 11.2 .2011, in favour of the petitioner No.1, shall accordingly stand vacated. As far as the remaining petitioners, namely, 1) Ataja Bibi, 2) Abdul Tal eb, 3) Anjuman Khatun and 4) Hamida Begum are concerned, this Court is of the vi ew that since the perusal of the Case Diary does not reveal such incriminating m aterials as would warrant their custodial detention, the interim directions, for pre-arrest bail, passed on 11.2.2011, in their favour, are hereby made absolute , subject to the condition that the aforesaid petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by police at all reasonable time. This bail application stands disposed of in terms of the above observations and directions.