IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 5326/2008 Decided on:23.7.2010 _____________________________________________ Inderjeet Singh. …Petitioner. Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and another. …Respondents. ______________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mrs. Anjula Khajuria, Advocate. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). At the joint request of the learned counsel for the parties, the present petition itself is directed to be treated as representation by the Secretary of the respondent-Board. The Secretary of the respondent-Board shall decide the representation within a period of ten weeks from today. While deciding the representation, he will take into consideration that at one given time prior to December, 1983, there was parity in the pay scale of the post hold by the petitioner vis-à-vis the posts of Bull Dozer Driver, Dumper Operator, Shovel Operator, Meter Grader Operator, Engine Driver, 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Crane Driver etc. He will pass a speaking order after hearing the petitioner. In the light of above, the petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 23.7.2010 *awasthi*