CR 280 of 2003. 30.5.2008 Present: Ms. Sunita Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Bimal Gupta, counsel for the respondents. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. Attempt for reconciliation was made but did not materialize. From the impugned order, I find that the new khasra numbers of the suit property have been admitted by the parties in the order passed by learned Sub Judge on 17.1.2003. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this admission was not made by her client and that the order was not correctly recorded. If that be so, the remedy of the petitioner would be by way of a review before the judicial authority who passed the order and not in revisional or appellate jurisdiction of this Court. In this view of the matter, this revision petition is disposed of. It will be open to the petitioner to approach the trial Court on grounds available in law to show that the statement so made was not correct. Revision petition is accordingly disposed of. Application(s) shall stand disposed of and interim order(s) shall stand vacated. May 30, 2008(PC). (Dev Darshan Sud), J.