IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1518 of 2006 DINESH PRASAD SINGH Versus RAM KUMARI DEVI & ORS ----------- 2. 5.12.2008 Surendra/ Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court once a notification under section 3 of the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act had been made, the consolidation proceeding would be deemed to be continued till it is denotified. That being so, if the court below has found that the suit has abated under section 4© of the Act the same can not be said to be vitiated by any error much less jurisdictional error. That being so, this application is wholly misconceived and is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.)