Cf't-vo'i_ IN THEHIGHGQURTOFCHHATTISGARHATBILASR'M WRIT PETITION(S)NO. ^, 2007 PETITIONER ^^ ^^ ^0^^" ^ \°^^y -J^y' ^•',^;ycy' . ^JMisha Lahere ? VWo Chandra Bhusan ; i Aged about23years R/o Gram-Ghota, P.O.-Ghota, Tehsil- Dhamdha, Dist- Durg (©.©) ^^y Versus ^ RESPONDENTS ^ > ^ .<^/' State of Chhattisgarh ^ ^ Through Secretary, Departrrienf of Women & Child Developmenf; Mantralaya, D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur Collector ' ' : ; Dhamdha, Dist-Durg(C.G) ' v District Women & Child Development Officer Collectorate, Dhgmdha, Digt- Durg(C.G) , ;. ^:i ... ^x ^A^-A^ Project Officer (Women ^jch^ Devlopment) Integrated ; Child Development prpjecf, Dhamdha, ^ Dist-Durg (C.G) Smt. Sarpjani Bai W/Q Rajulal R/o- Village Ghota, Tehsil- Dharnclha^ Dist- Durg (C.G) ,, :.;i':, ^ i \, :'*> /? WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTIGLE 226 OF THE CONSTlTUTl©NMK INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE WRIT QRDER OR D]RE£n'lQ;N TODO JUSTICEIN TH.EMATTER. •• '^^: a^:^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ y HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISOARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (s) No. 833 of 2007 SB: Honlate Mr. Justice Satteh K. AgnUMrtfI, J 1. .c' Thakur Shri H. S. Afaluwali^ Advocato fi>r thc pctitk»acr. Miss Deepali Pamley, Pandel Lawyer for the respondents No. l to4. ORDBR (Pasaed ont.his20thday<rfFtebrnaiy, WffT) By fhis petition, fhe petitioner chaHei^es fhe vaUdtty of fhe setection of thc respondent No. 5 fbr E^ipointment on the post of Aan^awadi Wortoer at yiB^e Ghola, District - Ovxg on the pound that fte petitioner is having higher qualifkation fhan tfae respondent No. 5 and one offhe fanuly membcisoffhcrespotuiuitNo.5 is m.serviceas SIuksha Karmi (herefbre the seleetion of the respondent No.5 is contEary to ttffi •circular of the State Govammcnt dated 6, l.2006 aad 10.4.2006. Leamed counsel for the petitmner subniits that fhe petitioner haa preferential nght to the selectu>n and appomtment as AayftsSbstSi Worker in Angaabadi Gentre Ghota, District- Duig. In view of the above, wifhout exprcssing any opuuon aa. faets as weU as on merit, fhe CoUector, Duig is directed to took into fhe aDegatfon made by fhe petitioner and passappropriate order in accoidanoe witli Aan^mwadi Scheme £mdlaw. The writ petitioais accoidingly disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge 2. 3. 4. •£sS& sass:' Petitioner NMhatahere Versus Respondents StateofGhliattisgaifa.&otticrai