IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated : Nainital the 26th April, 2011 Order on the bail application of accused Ist Bail Application No.303 of 2011 CRIMINAL SIDE Haji Mustakeem … Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand … Opposite Party Arising out of Case Crime No.4 of 2011 Under Sections 395, 342, 420, 170, 412, 504, 506 IPC P.S. Kotwali Manglore District Haridwar Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. Subhash Tyagi, the learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. S. S. Adhikari, the learned A.G.A. for the State. Certain persons impersonating as Sales Tax Officers stopped a truck loaded with fynolax wires and looted the said articles. The F.I.R. was lodged and the accused persons were arrested. It is alleged that on the pointing out of the accused, some of the looted articles were recovered from the applicant’s godown. Without commenting anything further on the merit of the case, coupled with the fact that co-accused Jeeshan has already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 25.04.2011 passed in B.A. No.306/2011, this Court is of the opinion that the applicant is also entitled to be enlarged on bail. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. Let the accused-applicant be released on bail in connection with Case Crime No.4/2011, P.S. Kotwali Manglore, District Haridwar on executing a personal bond and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 26.04.2011 LSR