1 cra915.sxw ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.915 OF 2010 Mahabaleshwar Shankar Mirajankar ...Applicant vs. Shankar Laxman Shinde & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Vishwanath Talkute for the applicants Mr.P.B.Shah for the respondent nos.1, 2 and 4 CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : OCTOBER 26, 2010 P.C.: . Not on board. Taken on board. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned counsel for the 1st, 2nd and 4th respondents. The learned counsel for the applicant on instructions of the applicant states that the applicant is not pressing the revision application on merits. He submitted that the applicant is working in a Bank and is likely to retire within a short time and therefore, he will have to make appropriate arrangement for securing another accommodation. He seeks longer time to vacate. 2 As the revision application is not pressed on merits, decree for possession will become final. Moreover, the applicant has shown willingness to give usual undertaking to vacate. Hence, time to vacate deserves to be granted till 31st March 2012. 3 Hence, I pass the following order : 2 cra915.sxw i) Revision application is dismissed as not pressed. ii)Notwithstanding the dismissal of the revision application, decree for possession shall not be executed till 31st March 2012 subject to the applicant filing his own usual undertaking and usual undertakings of all adult members of his family in this Court. Undertakings shall be filed within a period of four weeks from today with an advance copy to the Advocate for the respondents. iii)If the undertakings as above are not filed within a period of four weeks from today, the decree for possession will forthwith become executable. iv) There will be no order as to costs. JUDGE