HIGH COURT OF CJHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 3741 of2()06 ^' PETITIQNERS : 1. Smt. Harabai Wd/o Tarachand Chouhan, Aged about40years. 2. Gayatri D/o Late Tarachand Chouhan, Aged about 6 years, Minor guardian Ifarough mother Smt Harabai Wd/o Tarachand Chouhan. 3. Savatri D/o Late Tarachand Chouhan, Aged about 6 years, Minor guardiaa through mother Smt. Harabai Wd/o Tarachand Chouhan. Petitioner No. 1 to 3 are the R/o Village Bilaspur (Bhupdevpur) At present Gadgaon, Tehsil Gharghoda, Distt. Raigarh (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENT8 : 1. Aceountant General, Fafadeeh, Raipur Distt. Raipur (CG). 2. The Collector, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG). 3. The District Education OfEcer, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG). 4. State of Chhattisgarh through tfae Secretary, Education Department, DKS Bhawan, Distt. Raipur (CG). 5. Harihar Chouhan S/o Late Tarachand Chouhan, Aged about 22 years, R/o village Bilaspur (Bhupdevpur), Tehsil Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh (CG). (WRIT PETITION UNDER AR'HCLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTTTUT[ON OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present : Shri Manoj Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Ajay Barik, Advocate forthe respondentNo. 1. Smt SaritaC3iai,PmsiLawyer&1heStateteqxndaitNo.2to4. ORAL ORDER (PasseA on 11th day ofJaly, 2008) 1. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. 2. This petition pertains to payment ofretiral benefits. This Court, in the matter of W.P. No. (Baijnalfa Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to considerthe matter ofthe retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was J(-,- ^ constituted by the State Govemment, pursuant to the order dated 19.06^006 passed ia W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Government and others) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105/2008 (State of Chhattfsgarh and othere Vs. Baijnaft Mandal and another). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31 of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other connected matters; as submitted by the learaed counsel appearing for the parties. 4. This petition is disposed of in the same terms i.e. the ofiice of the Advocate General is directed to send the ease to the Committee, wrthin a period of 15 days from tiie date of receipt of a copy ofthe petition from the petitioners alongwith a copy of this order. Thereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioners and the officers concerned, within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall coasider and pass order, in accordance with law, aflter afibrding proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. The petitioners and the oflBcers concemed may file additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, including paynient of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner be completed within a period offour months from the date of receipt ofthe file from the office ofthe Advocate General. 5. The petitioner shall supply extra copy ofthe petition to leamed counsel appearing for the respondents, for forwarding the same to the said committee. Sahu SdA Satish K.Agnihotri Judge