IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4541 of 2010 DURGA PRASAD SINGH S/O LATE SURYA DEO PRASAD SINGH R/O VILL.- ROHUA RAJA RAM, P.S.- MUSHARI, DISTT.- MUZAFFARPUR Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2.THE DIRECTOR (PRIMARY EDUCATION), BIHAR, PATNA. 3.THE DIRECTOR, PROVIDENT FUND, BIHAR, PATNA. 4.THE PRINCIPAL, PRIMARY TEACHERS’ TRAINING COLLEGE (GOVT. M.P.T. EDUCATION COLLEGE)DUMRA, SITAMARHI. 5.THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER,SITAMARHI ----------- 3. 2.4.2010 This case has come under the heading “To be Mentioned” at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that due to inadvertence in the first paragraph of the order dated 16.3.2010 instead of the words “District Provident Fund Officer, Sitamarhi” it is mentioned as “Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Patna”. Let the aforesaid words be read as “District Provident Fund Officer, Sitamarhi” instead of “Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Patna”. The time for filing the representation is extended by further two weeks from today. The order dated 16.3.2010 is modified to the above extent. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)