IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.p.IS) No. g6 é/ /2oo7 / PETITIONER Dr. S.S. Agrawal, S/o. Late Shri S.K. Agrawal, Aged about 49 years, R/o. Ambikapur, District Surguja (CG) VERSUS /" RESPONDENTS 1} StaLe of Chhauisgarh, Through: Secretary, Higher Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) / 2] Joint Secretary, Higher Education Department,_Raipur, Distt Raipur (CG) K“ Commissioner, Higher Education, State of Chhattisgarh, Government Science College Premises, Raipur (CG) Raipur, District WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA m LQ H§GH (3013?? {BF CHHAT?§S‘GARH i B§LA$?UR WRI? §3E?3'§"ION {S} N0566i OF 21307 Dr. SS. Agrawai Versus Sia‘te of Chhatiisgarh & Di‘nem RESP$N DEN’TS {V‘smt Petition under Aftic§e 226 0f {he Cargstiiuiian 0f éndia3 Smgie Bemh : HonEiaie Shri Sa‘kish K Agnéham J. Present :— 3hr? Mancj Paranjwe, Gounse§ for ‘me pwmner. 8hr? Afv‘. Sfédhar, Pane! Lawyer fmihe $iate. GRDER {QRAU x (Pawed {3n ihi$ ?Sm day a? Februafy. 26‘: m ?} Wkh :he caraseni 03’ Seamed sauns‘eé aggwaa’ing far the partiias; the petiiiun i$ heam fmaéiy. 2‘; The petitianm has Weei ‘thiS pemon chaiiengmg me Order dafted 25-?0—2QG? 8y virtue r3; me in‘iarim crder dated rig—H—E’Gw gassed by this {mart ihe peiiiéaner is caminumg at mg» originai §%a$e of pastirzg. NO effect ceuid be given m the impugned ordei' dated 25-”ai)~2@3‘7, due t0 ihe interim bmer dams! 1&1 $26!)? 3) Be ihat as ii may; wifh wa passage 0f time ms geiitian has became infruc‘zuous, a$ %he perked 9f tfamfer is net appiica‘me farever. At ‘ihis po‘mt {3f ’{éma it és n0”! necessary ta examine ihe ) §egaiity and vaiidity 0f the imgugned order. Hewever; the feepondent auiheriiies are at §ibenky ielpase epemmeie ordea’e keepieg %n View the pub§ie in‘tereei eed eeminieiraiive exigeney; withem §ne§si§ng 0e campiianceefjehe 'ameugned (meet 4) in v‘sew ef fefegoing; ihe writ petitien is déepeeed of. Ne erder aetc casts. Sdl— ‘ Satish K. Agnihotri Gewei Judge