IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA SECOND APPEAL NO. 22 OF 2005 MRS. MERICIA SENHORA DO ROSARIO ....Appellant VIEGAS E GOMES Versus M/S ALMEIDA ASSOCIATES,MARGAO GOA. ....Respondent Shri P.P. Singh, advocate for the appellant. Coram:- R. M. LODHA, J. Date:- 22nd September, 2005 P.C. Heard Mr. P. P. Singh, the learned counsel for the appellant. The appellant is the original plaintiff. Though the suit came to be dismissed by the trial Court, the Appeal Court partly decreed the plaintiff's suit by directing the defendant to pay to her a sum of Rs.24,007/- with interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of filing of the suit until realization. The grievance of the appellant is that she should have been granted a decree in the sum of Rs.42,456.30 p. in the light of the agreement entered into between the parties. Upon perusal of the Judgment of the Appeal Court, I find that the findings recorded by the Appeal Court are based on appreciation of evidence on record. It does not give rise to any question of law, much less substantial question of law. The Second Appeal does not deserve to be admitted. Second Appeal is dismissed in limine. R. M. LODHA, J. mc.