THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1116 of 2004 O R D E R: This Criminal Revision Case is filed against the judgment in Criminal Appeal No.61 of 2002, dated 02.07.2004 on the file of the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Warangal, whereunder the learned Sessions Judge allowed the appeal in part setting aside the conviction and sentence of A2 and A.4 for the offence punishable under Section 411 IPC and they are acquitted. A.1, A.3 and A.5 were convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000 /- each, in default of payment of fine, to suffer simple imprisonment for two months for the offence punishable under Section 384 IPC. The brief facts of the case are as follows: Two months prior to 30.6.2000 at about 12.30 mid night, PW.1 Sri D.Rajendra Karan and his wife were in their house, some unknown persons entered their house and threatened them at point of a pistol demanding Rs.20,000/- as party fund, representing that they were the nexalites and when the said Rajendra Karan expressed his inability to pay such amount, they took away his Bajaj Scooter AEO 2257 worth Rs.15,000/-. They had also threatened him with dire consequences, directing him to keep money ready when him before their next visit. Later on PW.1 came to know that those persons were not naxalites and were fake, preferred a complaint in Hanamkonda Police Station, where a case was registered investigated into. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that there is no test identification parade and the description of the accused were not given at any point of time and the accused were identified only at the trial Court after lapse of two years. But this Court from the records able to understand that they able to identify the persons concerned since because of the offence took place for a considerable time. The learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing for some time submitted that he prays only in connection with sentence. Considering the above facts and circumstances, as the occurrence took place in the year 2000, this Court is inclined to reduce the sentence imposed by the trial Court. Accordingly, the conviction confirmed and the sentence of imprisonment imposed by the trial Court is modified to three months from three years. With the above modification, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. __________________ RAJA ELANGO, J 6th July, 2010. PNV