IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1136 of 2010 1. SAKET PASWAN 2. VIVEKANAND PASWAN, BOTH SONS OF BRAHMDEO PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.1.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 448, 307, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Taking into consideration the fact that the main allegation of firing and causing death of the deceased Raghubir Paswan is upon co-accused Tulo Paswan, let the petitioner above named, who are in custody since 16.11.2009 and have no criminal antecedents, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in Naokothi P.S.case No.49 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not an accused in any other case and if they are they he shall not be released on bail and (iii) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the - 2 - trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )