IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4259 of 2010 RAM BRIKSH GOPE . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 21.04.2010 Heard. The only ground on which fresh prayer for bail has been made is that the petitioner is in custody since 21st April 2008. The facts of the case and the contentions which were made earlier on merits of the matter were noticed by me and earlier prayer was rejected by order dated 18.12.2008 contained in annexure - I. I do not find any reason to reconsider the prayer. Petition is dismissed. However, what appears painful to me is that it is a classic example of insensitivity on the part of the learned Sessions Judge, Patna that the cases of this nature lies in vacant courts as appears from the rejection order passed in Sessions Trial No. 1643 of 2008 which is dated 3.12.2009. This court believes that the case has now been made over to any regular court, in case, it is still pending before a vacant court. The seniormost Additional Judge at Barh shall compile the pendency of such cases in vacant court and refer the matter to the District & Sessions Judge, Patna requesting him to make over the cases to courts which have Presiding Officers. Let a copy of this court be also placed before the Hon’ble Inspecting Judge of Patna, so that the matter may be reviewed from His Lordship’s level. Praful (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)