1 mss WP5715 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 5715 OF 2011 M/s. K. C. Industries .. .. PETITIONERS Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. .. RESPONDENTS Mr. A. Y. Sakhare, Sr. Counsel i/b G. M. Savagave for the petitioner Mr. C. R. Sonawane, AGP for R-1 to 3. Mr. Sanjay Jain with Mr. Vivek Phadke i/b Kaikini Phadke & Associates for R-4. Mr. A. B. Shinde for R-5 CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI & RAJESH G. KETKAR, JJ. DATED : 18/8/2011 P.C.: We have heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. In our opinion, in the circumstances of the case, without considering the merits of the case and without expressing any opinion on the submissions made by learned Counsel for the parties, following order will meet the ends of justice; 2 mss WP5715 3. Respondent 1 shall decide the petitioner’s revision application filed on 30/6/2011 under Section 257 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 and the revision application filed by respondent 5 on the same date i.e. on 30/6/2011 within a period of four months from the date of receipt of this order. 4. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the revision applications may be decided independently and in accordance with law. All contentions of all parties are kept open. 5. The petitioner and the respondents are entitled to raise all contentions before the 1st respondent. During the pendency of the revision applications, without prejudice to its contentions the State shall not take any coercive steps against the petitioner and the petitioner shall also not create any third party interest in the subject matter of this petition. 6. Petition is disposed of in the aforestated terms. (SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.) (RAJESH G. KETKAR, J.)