IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.: 5331 of 2011. Decided on: 19.08.2011. _________________________________________________ Meena Bhatti. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): It is submitted by Mr. Ramakant Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment dated 9th May, 2011 rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in Narendar Kapila and another versus State of H.P. and others, CWP No.3027 of 2011 and other connected matters. 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - petitioner as per the principles laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in the judgment, cited hereinabove, within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition and the copy of judgment referred to above by the petitioner. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. August 19, 2011. (sck).