1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1097 OF 2008 Mrs. Yessonda C. Dalton ... Petitioner Vs. Smt. Ivy Da Fonseca & Anr. ... Respondents Mr. Shailendra S. Kanetkar,Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok B. Tajane,Advocate, for the respondent No.1. Smt. A.A.Mane, APP, for the respondent No.2 - State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 15th June, 2010. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The complainant/respondent is mother of the accused, who has filed this petition. According to the complainant, she is the co-owner of the flat in dispute. The relations between herself and her daughter are strained since 1977. In August 1999, the accused tried to commit trespass on the flat in possession of the complainant, abused and assaulted her. About that, a report was lodged with the police. She contends that the accused got prepared a false and fabricated power of attorney in her favour and on the basis of that forged document 2 purporting to have been executed by the complainant, the accused got the property transferred in her name in the year 2003. After she came to know, she filed a complaint under Sections 465, 468, 471 and 420 IPC and the complaint is registered as Criminal Case No.4328/2005. The learned Magistrate issued process against the accused. The accused challenged that order by filing a Revision Application before the Sessions Court. The Revision Application was rejected. Hence, this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution. 3. In view of the facts and circumstances noted above, I find no illegality or irregularity in issuance of process. If the accused has any defence, that can be looked into at the time of trial. 4. Therefore, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)