1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 3 OF 2010 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 166 OF 2002. B.I.F.R. ..Petitioner. And Mr. Ravindra Dattaram Parab. ..Applicant. v/s. The Official Liquidator & Liquidator of M/s. Modi Stone Ltd. ..Respondent. .... Mr. L. Ronald Castelino, for Applicant. Official Liquidator, present. .... CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 28TH JANUARY 2010. P.C. This application is taken out by the applicant workman seeking re-adjudication of their claim being claim Sr.No. 555/1056/5506 with a direction that while re-adjudicating the said claim, the Liquidator be also directed to consider the claim pertaining to retrenchment compensation. In the alternative, the applicant has sought withdrawal of the affidavit of proof of debt already on record, with liberty to file a fresh affidavit of proof of debt incorporating the claim for retrenchment compensation and 2 other eligible claims. 2. The Official Liquidator states that he has no objection in re-adjudicating the claim and if the company application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (d) and (e). 3. The company application is therefore, allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (d) and (e). The company application is accordingly, disposed of with no order as to costs. [ S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. ]