IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.5967 of 2011 Rajinder Singh Vs. State of Haryana & others Present: Mr.J.P.Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner wants Ist and 2nd ACP. Earlier, direction was issued to consider the legal notice. In response, it is stated that the petitioner was granted Ist ACP as well as the benefit on account of 5th Pay Commission. 2nd ACP has been denied to the petitioner on the ground that he is awarded punishment of stoppage of two increments and hence would not be entitled to the same. Grievance is that Ist ACP and the benefit of 5th Pay Commission have not been granted to the petitioner. Since it is a disputed question of fact, the petitioner may have his alternative remedy of filing a civil suit by showing how these benefits have not been paid to him. It would not be appropriate to go into such disputed questions of fact in exercise of writ jurisdiction. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. April 04, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE