IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP(T) No.5236 of 2008 (OA No.2847 of 2002) Date of decision: July 29, 2010. Ranjeet Singh. …. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and another. …. Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surinder Singh, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Sanjay Jaswal, Advocate. For the respondents. Mr. J.S. Rana, Asstt. A.G. for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. YPS Dhaulta, Advocate, for respondent No.4. Respondent No.3 ex parte. Surinder Singh, J (oral). According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner shall feel satisfied in case respondent No.2 District Primary Education Officer 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? - 2 - (DPEO), Mandi reconsiders his case on the following three aspects:- (i) Whether the husband of respondent No.4 Smt. Sheela Devi, is a Government servant, employed in H.P. Public Works Department? (ii) Whether the family of respondent No.4 has donated the land for the construction of the school, wherein respondent No.4 is presently serving as a Water Carrier? (iii) Whether the marks awarded to respondent No.4 under the aforesaid heads by the Selection Committee were correct? 2. The request made is not opposed and is genuine and would finally determine the matter. Therefore, the instant petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2 (District Primary Education Officer, Mandi) after affording an opportunity hold enquiry and upon hearing both the parties shall pass appropriate orders based upon facts qua the above posers, within a period of two months from the production of certified copy of this order before him, by the petitioner. - 3 - 3. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. 4. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stands disposed of. July 29, 2010. (Surinder Singh), (Pds) Judge.