ladda WRIT PETITION NO. 4025 OF 2009. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4025 OF 2009. Shri Anant Shankar Redij. ....Petitioner Versus Shri Siddhi Vinayak Mandir Trust & ors ...Respondents. Mr Rajesh S.Datar for the Petitioner. Mr Manish Dubey i/by Harshad Bhadbhade for Respondent Nos.1 to 11. CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATED : 3rdOctober, 2011. P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. Writ petition arises out of the proceeding under section 70B of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. All the Authorities below have concurrently held that the petitioner has failed to prove his tenancy in the land in question. The petitioner, in his cross-examination, has given admission that his father was a Trustee of the respondent No.1- Trust. The land in question belongs to respondent No.1-Trust. The petitioner, in his cross-examination, has further given admission that his father was managing the property in question and excluding the expenses for cultivation, remaining income was used to be deposited with the Trust. ladda WRIT PETITION NO. 4025 OF 2009. This admission negatives the petitioner's case about his tenancy in the said property. This issue is covered by the Apex Court judgment in the case of Ishwardas v. M.R.T.Nagpur, A.I.R. 1968 1364 . The Authorities below have approached the matter from correct point of view. No interference is required in my writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Writ petition is dismissed. (RANJIT MORE, J.)