THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.5544 of 2010 ORDER: This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 07.02.2010. It is the case of the petitioner-society that an extent of Ac.15.00 in R.S.No.335 of Ibrahimpatnam, Krishna District, was given on lease in its favour initially in 2001, and thereafter, the said lease is being extended from time to time and it is valid upto 2010. As some antisocial elements are trying to occupy the said land and spoil the crop therein, the petitioner made several representations to the third respondent-Tahsildar, Ibrahimpatnam as well as the fourth respondent-Executive Engineer (Irrigation) & River Conservator, Krishna, to fix physical boundaries. As they failed to consider its representation, the petitioner filed W.P.No.23528 of 2009 and this Court disposed of the said writ petition on 29.10.2009 directing the third respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass necessary orders. Pursuant to the said order dated 29.10.2009, the third respondent along with the Surveyor made survey of the land and reported that the land in R.S.No.335 is only Acs.1.35 cents. As the third respondent has not surveyed the land as per the physical boundaries and the sketch shown in lease memos, the petitioner made a final representation to the respondents on 07.02.2010 for rectification of the survey numbers to the leased land as shown in the boundaries mentioned in the lease memo. However, the respondents have not take any action so far. Hence, this writ petition. On 10.03.2010, this Court issued Notice before admission and adjourned the matter at the request of the learned Government Pleader for Irrigation & Command Area Development to get instructions. On 12.07.2010, the learned Government Pleader submitted that the lease granted in favour of the petitioner already expired and the request of the petitioner for renewal of the lease was rejected by the authorities. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner fairly conceded that the lease granted in favour of the petitioner expired and that the request of the petitioner for renewal of the lease was also rejected. In that view of the matter, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition and the same is accordingly closed. There shall be no order as to costs. N.V. RAMANA, J Date: 03.08.2010 va