IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20949 of 2009 SANTOSH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 01.07.2009 Heard both sides. The sole petitioner seeks regular bail in a case instituted under Sections 395 and 397 of the Penal code. The case relates to commission of dacoity in a house. The petitioner was identified as one of the co-accuseds involved in the commission of offence and thus been named in the F.I.R. It appears from the impugned order that the other witnesses have also identified the petitioner while he was retrieving along with the booties. It further appears from the impugned order that the petitioner has criminal antecedent. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that some of the other accused persons, although, not named in the F.I.R., have been granted the privilege of bail by this court. It is further contended that he is in custody since 06.12.2008. Having regard to the allegations and the materials available on record, this court does not find a good case for grant of bail has been made out. Prayer for bail is accordingly rejected. Petitioner may renew prayer for bail after one year, if the trial in the meanwhile does not commence. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)