IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 5TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 14TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 31265 of 2009(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- SREE PULINKAVU AYYAPPA KSHETRA PUNARUDHARANA COMMITTEE,REP.BY ITS EXECUTIVE MEMBER, NARAYANANKUTTY M., AGED 37,S/O.KUNJUNNY, MANAGATTIL HOUSE, PUNCHAPADAM P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SMT.PREETHY KARUNAKARAN & SRI.K.RAVI (PARIYARATH) RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVT, DEVASWOM DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD, REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN, KOZHIKODE. 3. THE COMMISSIONR, MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD, KOZHIKODE. 4. THE ASST. COMMISSIONR, MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD, PALAKKAD. 5. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SREE PULINKAVU AYYAPPA KSHETRAM, PUNCHAPADAM, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 6. THE INSPECTOR, OTTAPALAM DIVISION, MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD, CHERUPULASERY, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 7. GOPALAKRISHNAN S/O. RAMANKUTTY GUPTAN, ERAKATTIL, PUNCHAPADAM P.O. PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV. SHRI R. LAKSHMI NARAYAN AR2 TO R4 BY DV. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN,SC,MALABAR DEVASWOM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMAN & P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JJ. ............................................................................... W.P.(C) No. 31265 OF 2009 ....................................................................... Dated this the 5th November, 2009 J U D G M E N T P.R. Raman, J: Ext. P1 is the application/complaint made by the Petitioner Committee (which is stated to be assisting in the administrative affairs of the temple) before the 4th respondent/Asst. Commissioner. The complaint is against the 7th respondent. It is also stated that pursuant to the complaint, an inspection has been conducted. Ext.P2 is the report . 2. In the view we are taking, it is not necessary to issue notice to the 7th respondent at this stage, since we are only directing the Asst. Commissioner to take a decision in the matter, after giving an opportunity of being heard to the affected persons, as expeditiously as possible at any rate within two months. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. P.R. RAMAN, JUDGE. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk