HIGH COURT 9F CHHATT§SGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION §C§ NG. 2766 OF 2009 Baldev S§ngh, Sic Late Ajit Singh, aged about 4? years, Occupation Business, R/o Gurunanak Nagar, Raipu: {CG}. Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through ihe Secretary. Housing & Urban Development Depanmen’t, DK$ Bhawan. Mantraiaya, Raipur (CG). 2. The Director, Town & Country Warming, Raipur (CG). Gram Panchayat, Devpuri, Through Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Devpuri, Raipur(CG). PETiTiONER RESPONDENTS {Wrrt pet§:ion under Article 226 of the Canstitution of {new} Singie Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satis§1 K. Agnihotri, J.‘ Present :— Mr. Chandresh $hrivastava, couneei for the petitioner. Mr. Arun Sac, Govt. Advocate for the State. QRDER gems.) ‘ (Passed on this 3’ day of Juiy, 2009) Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2) At the very outset, Shri Sao. iearned Govt. Advocate appeared for the State, submits that the petitioner hae not been granted permission on account of the fact that the iand in dispute comes within the prescribed iimtt of Ring Road No.4 as per the Raipur Deveiopment Scheme 2021. Even otherwise. the petitioner may be given opportunity of hearing on 157—2009. 3) in View of foregoing statement made by learned counsei appearing for the State, according towShri Chandresh Shrivastava, teamed counael appearing for the/petitioner. nothing survives in this writ petition for adjudication. 4) Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. i ’ ’“ Sdl— Satish K. Agnihotri ‘ Judge /