IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-25262 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : 13.12.2011 Harneet Kaur …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondents ………. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Raghubir Chaudhary, Sr.DAG, Punjab. Mr. Narinder Singh, Advocate, for respondent Nos.4 to 7 *** Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Present petition is filed seeking directions to respondent Nos.2 and 3 for registration of case under Sections 406,498-A,323,506,120-B IPC against respondent Nos.4 to 7. Mr. Raghubir Chaudhary, learned Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, on instructions from Inspector Baljinder Singh, has stated that inquiry was conducted by ACP, Jalandhar and no offence was found, therefore, there is no question of registering the FIR. In view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others’, resported in 2008 (2) SCC 409, petitioner has alternate remedy of filing an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. or to file complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. I am not inclined to exercise my jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Dismissed. ( Alok Singh ) December 13, 2011 Judge Anand