^^i^^ ^iii-'6^ ^ ^•-^' ,*•' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No._ 'Sl0^ of 2006. In the matter of section 2(x) of the Chhattisgarh Commercial Tax Act. 1994 And In the matter of section 70 (1) of the Chhattisgarh Commercial Tax Act. 1994 \...... And In the matter of section 71 (3) of the Chhattisgarh Commercial Tax Act. 1994 And In the matter of anapplication under Articles 226/227 ofthe constitution of India. And In the matter of :- PetitiQn'er ResDpndents ^so;^ B&^k'BS- [e»&to^-" M/s. RaikaJSpat Udyog, Ring Road No.2,Gondwara ,Raipur(C.G.) Through Patner Sanjay Raika S/o. Late Durga Prasad Raika Aged about 45 years, R/o. Near Shikarpuri Dharamshala Behind Water tank ,Samta Colony, Raipur (C.G.) Versus i* 1. Board of Revenue '-' (Commercial Tax Tribunal) through secretary, Bilaspur (C.G.) • 2. *,-*\.^--- 3. Commissionerof Commercial Tax Vanijyik Kar Bhavan Civil lines Raipur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh through secretary Department of Commercial Tax DKS Mantralaya Bhavan Raipur (C.G.) Before:- Hon'ble the Chief Justice and his companion judges of the Hon'bleHiflh Courtofj. udicatyre Chhattisflarh^t Bjlaapur. Petitjon_ynder Ai-ticles ^26/227 of the constitytiori'Qt'lndia for issuanceof su'rtable directions 'irders or _writs includina writs in the nature of mandamus certiorer etc.:- , The humbU petitidn of the petitioner above mentioned most respectfully shewf .,h as un jer:- XI-HC—7S CT^I Vf WW ?T^T^T^Ta)*liq> -^3? ' Raju v< '3S[ "qi<ii^<i, yal-H'ie, fsldl'yy,'!. ...U:),£,^o,.^c7Cr7/G6 311^1 •'PHT Crt^q) ^dTW ^rfSH 311^1 AgnihofrL*} 19.11-200S Mr. Nselabh Dubey, c|3unsel for the petitioner. Mr. M.P.S. Bhatia, Deitiuty Government Advocate for the State. I.A.No.7366of2006. This is an application The appl'ication is ord one week time is granted to office, faiiing which the p' prosecution without rsferenc ^i|'i4^41l Wff^f ^ 7%l^l TFif^R ^ajfiitisn^i &r taKina cocuments on rec ;red as prayed for. On the request of Se^rned counsei appsartns tnake goo3<t»edefault as pointed out t>y ths fetition shall stane! dismissed for want of to the Bench. ^tsK.'A^alow Sausb i^-, lud&e T T°E[ ^i^iid'M, »Ti1'M'i<o, ^<niyy,< inwif a»<ii<t> sn^i tra^ (•pta'i^i) sffi^t qn (<•<!•*> 'cWT 3IT^?T sRtlN? •+i<ii<-i41-< ^wvS^ fvSt <Rit<;i< ^rairRnsii^ir In view of the report dated 15/01/2009 submitted by the office, this W.P. No. is treated as dismissed for non compliance of Hon'ble Court order dated 19/11/2008. (For detail note sheet part may kindly be seen). "'*••?'- r Vii. C0ui3Lsel be informed accordingly. ----—«-- Sd/- A. R. (JudL) S. O. fW.P.) wQv VSR yvsv, Tja-wm — FS/197—3/2008—40,000. / i*"