'/\/ IN THE HIGH COURT OP JUDICATURE AT BIIA8PUR Writ Petition Wo.l0^-! / 2005 /' PETITIONER Z&®7 .•'\^z\y «<py^ ^"'^'/ ^^ 4. 5. Siat. Ssrapna leahiri, Aged about 64 yeara, W/oSbriA.K.Lahiri, pccupation- Retu-ed Qoveriunent Servant, E/ o Godripara, Chiriuiri, District- Korea (C.G.). State of CUhattisgarh, Through. Secretary, Hi^ier Education Departnient, Mairtralaya, D, K. S. Bhawran, Shastri Chowk, Raipur (C.G.) Coianussioner, Higher Education, Caiapus of Govt. Science CoUege, Raipur (C.G-). Additional Director, Higher Education, Directorate, Raipur (C.G.). Accoun.tan.t General, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.). Seirior Accounts Officer, Accountant General Office, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.). Principal, Govt. Lahiri College, Chu-miri, District- Korea (C.G.). 2 7- Slu-i T. K. Bhattachaiya, Principal, Govt. Lahiri CoUege, Chtriuiri, District- Korea (C.G.] WRIT PEa-XTOK USDER AKTICLE 226/237 OF THE COHSTITirTION OF IMDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE OKDES. OR DIRECTION TO DO JUSTICE IS THE ii;3l K XI-HC-22 3n^T?n' f?;iN;3f]^r ShHl=bBf^r 3^ •^WMil, ®Tf)«'16,fsjdly^ ^r'-rarei ^...UR^:.^ 3TI^T?RIT8(FI;fff?ff »l''<fa<f1-<t|110'l'fffWt<l»lt<l< ^isri^Ta.n^r 30/03/2005 Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, ShriJ.D.Bajpai, G.A.forthj Heard. The instant petition has retired on 30/06/2003 as Prinoipaf and though the amount towards was already sanctioned by the-f^ the respondent No.6 who is the the same deliberately without contention, the petitioner has ann| the State Government particul^i whereby the respondent No.6 w^ above to the petitioner but jn spi| been paid to him for the last two y|i Learned counsel for the would be ser/ed if the respond| payable to the petitioner within a has no objection. In view of the submissiorls petition is disposed of with a dues for whioh the petitioner is rules, within a period of one mont)' c|3unsel for the petitioner. i| respondents. 6?' b^en filed by the petitioner on the ground that he of Govt. Lahari College, Chinniri, Distt. Korea t^ie GPF, family benefit and 90% of the gratuity (spondent No. 2 to 4 but despite this sanction, prawing and disbursing authority is not paying |any authority of law. To demonstrate this i^xed with this petition various orders passed by rly by the Commissioner, Higher Education /bs directed to disburse the amount mentioned te of the aforesaid direotion, the same has not ifears. [setitioner submits that the ends of the justice ;nts are directed to disbuise the retiral dues |ime frame to which counsel for the respondents 1s advanced by the counsel for the parties, the dii^otion to the respondents to pay all the retiral ^ntitled along with the interest thereon as per from the date of receipt of copy ofthis order. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ('fliy^) ..-^.JUi