IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.137 of 2009 Saimur Rahman, son of Sayeedur Rahman, resident of Ward No.12 of Araria Municipality, P.S. Araria, District- Araria ………. Petitioner Versus Parth Sarthi Das Gupta, Advocate, son of Late Niranjan Das Gupta, resident of Ward No.13, Araria Municipality, P.S. & District- Araria ………. Opp.Party ----------- 4. 22/09/2010 Petitioner has filed this review application for review of order dated 10.4.2009 passed in Civil Revision No. 83 of 2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the signature on the document has been exhibited but the contents of the same has not been exhibited. She submits that the contents of documents are also required to be exhibited by the court. This plea can be taken by the petitioner before the trial court itself by filing a fresh application. If the said application is rejected by the trial Court, that will be a new cause of action for the petitioner. So far as this review application is concerned, this Court does not find any substance in the same, and therefore, the same is dismissed. Pradeep/ ( J.N.Singh, J.)