1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3078/2009 Miss Shakuntla Mathur Vs. ADJ No.9, Jaipur City & Ors. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. ORDER 31.7.2009. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3078/2009 Miss Shakuntla Mathur Vs. ADJ No.9, Jaipur City & Ors. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Shri K.D. Gaur, for the petitioner. Shri R.K. Mathur, for the respondent. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 23.9.2006 (Annexure7) by which the application submitted by the plaintiff petitioner for permission to file the rejoinder to the written statement filed by the defendant has been dismissed. The copy of the plaint has been filed as Annexure-1, the written statement filed by the defendant is Annexure-2 on record and the application submitted by the plaintiff petitioner seeking leave of the court to file a rejoinder is Annexure-3. I am satisfied that the impugned order does not call for any interference in writ jurisdiction. 2 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3078/2009 Miss Shakuntla Mathur Vs. ADJ No.9, Jaipur City & Ors. The plea which the petitioner plaintiff wants to raise with regard to the alleged fraud in getting the sale deed executed by still the date representing the same to be a mortgage deed of the house and instead getting the sale deed executed has already been alleged by the plaintiff in para 7 of the plaint Annexure-1. The controversy centers around the aforesaid act and therefore in the facts and circumstances of this case since the matter has already been pleaded in the plaint itself, there is no need for any rejoinder and the impugned order does not call for any interference in writ jurisdiction. This writ petition is accordingly dismissed summarily. (DALIP SINGH),J. Ram Chandr Khatri PS