t 15 # %. 21.07.2010 Present: Ms. Anjana Prabhakar, Adv. for the petitioner along with petitioner in person. Mr. U.L. Watwani, APP for the State along with SI Bhanu Pratap, P.S. Chanakya Puri. Complainant/respondent no.2 in person along with her son. + Crl. M.A. 8835/2010 * Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. Crl. M.C. 2275/2010 & Crl. M.A. 8836/2010 (Stay) One Kali Charan Sharma was employed with petitioner no. 5 as an Electrician. Unfortunately, he died while in office on account of an unfortunate incident. Petitioner nos. 1 to 4 are Managing Directors/Managers/Officers of petitioner no. 5. On the complaint of complainant/respondent no.2 (widow of the deceased), FIR No. 212/2008 under Section 304-A IPC was registered at Police Station Mandir Marg. All other claims of the deceased are stated to have been settled. Complainant/respondent no.2 also initiated the matter under the Workmen Compensation Act seeking compensation and the proceedings are pending. However, petitioners and Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified . \ 3 complainant/respondent no.2 have now compromised the matter. Terms of the com promise have been recorded in the Deed of Compromise dated 24th May, 2010. In terms of said compromise respondent no.2 has already received Rs. l lakh and balance amount of Rs.1,50,000/- has been paid today by the petitioners to respondent no.2 in the Court by way of two demand drafts photocopy whereof has been placed on record. In view of the compromise entered into between the parties whereby respondent no.2 has been suitably compensated, I am of the view that no fruitful purpose would be served by compelling the parties to continue to litigate protracted trial. Accordingly, I quash the FIR No. 212/2008 under Section 304-A IPC registered at Police Station Mandir Marg and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom. Parties shall be bound by the terms of compromise as recorded in the compromise deed. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Das ti. ~~- A.K. PATHAK, J. July 21, 2010/ga