§etiiioner Respondent HigH ’GQFT GF CHHATTESGA§H: BILA$PUR aiami nki. H33; a? 293$ \ Krishi Upaj Mandi $amiti, Takhatpur, District Biisssur, ithrough iis Seeietary, Motiisi Kesharwani, Krism Ugaad Mandi Samiii, Takhatpur, Diséyict B§§aspur5 Chhatt‘isgarh. Versus Kn. Sandhya Soni. aged abotii 35 years. Dfo. Shn Ramesnwai Prasad Soni. Kaii Badi. Near Chhote Mandif. V§§§age & Pest Takhatpur, Disfrict Biiaspur, Chhaiiisgarh. (Wrii Pei§ti0n under Aiyiicie 228/‘227 of Consiitution of Mdia) 8S: Hon’bie mr. Saiish K. Agn§%acta‘i, J. Rtesem. ML Ratnesh Agrawai, Advocale appears 0n hnhaif 0f Mr. RS. Mr. Anurag Shrivastava, Advocam for ihe respendent. Marhaa Advasate soume? far ihe peiiticmai’. §Passed ea this ’i‘im day of February, 2i§§$§ $.A.No.‘§. This §s an app!icai§on fox” withdrawa§ of the petét§sn o objection from o‘thes’ side. For me reasons mentioned in the appiicatbn, it i5 ornered as wayed fen Acccfd’ingiy the petition is dismissed a3 wiindrawn. Conseqnentiy, MWPNO. 189G sf 20% aiso siands dismissed. 3RN. GR§E§ Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge N