IN THE fflGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ArBD^ASPHR fC.G.) W.P.NO. -LJ-i-1- OF2003 PETITIO -.^^ri^" ^^' I^J^ v^ RESPONDENTS SMT. SNEHLATA SHRIVASTAVA, ^ Wp. SHRIRAJKUMAR c^J- <^n^ iS^ ^ASTAVA, D/0. SHRI SfflVNANDANPRASAD R/O.PHUNDURDIEIARI, AMBIKAPUR.TAHSIL AMBIKAPUR, DISTT. SURGUJA(CG) Veisus 1) STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT DKS BHAVAN, RAIPUR (C.G.). 2 ) SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER AMBIKAPUR, SURGUJA (C.G.) 3) TAHSILDAR, AMBIKAPUR DISTRICT SURGUJA (C.G.) 4) GOLLECTOR SURGUJA, AMBIKAPU^(C.G.). <%WRiT PETITION LiNDER ARTIGLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITVTION OF mWA XI-HC-22 3^''<ll't|l<«|<(,s9Tf|(l'|6,isldiy^ 311^1 <45|th *ll*<Mlsnilch """"••"•""""Wj- 200J' £> Sn^rqir R^i+sn^r sfiii'iylgcl ^: sn^r s^irar Hf^tT V. ^'^ \ 08.04.2006:- Shri A.N.Pandsy, leamed c< Shri Sumesh Bajaj, learned )|ynsel for the petitioner. Py.©;A.for the State/respondents. Heard. Learned counsel for the has been filed as the petitione^ respondent No.3, Tehslldar. However, learned oounsel petition as subsequent to filing of| has already been issued to the become infructuous. In view of the submission o-( dismissed as having become infryc( pe|titioner <ni<<F<'l<f1-< WRTfyteA <Rl^<il< ^iSlf^ITSn^T subroits that the in3tant petition was refused domjcjle certificate by 'fir the petitioner seeks to withdraw this the instantpetition, domicile certificate aetttteiner and as such the petition has counsel for the petitioner.'the petition is uous. SdA / DhirendraMishra Judge (iftiy^)