IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER, TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI WRIT PETITION NO : 22145 of 1994 Between: 1 Smt. Ramalamma, W/o Govindu, 41 years, R/o Madapur (V), Sherilingampally, R.R.Dist. 2 Lachamma, W/o Kanappa, 26 years, R/o Madapur (V), Sherilingampally, R.R.Dist. 3 Anjamma, W/o Balaiah, 31 years, R/o Madapur (V), Sherilingampally, R.R.Dist. 4 Balamma, W/o Kurmaiah, 21 years, R/o Madapur (V), Sherilingampally, R.R.Dist. 5 Dastamma, W/o chandraiah,21 years, R/o Madapur (V), Sherilingampally, R.R.Dist. 6 Narasamma, W/o Narsaiah, 26 years, R/o Madapur (V), Sherilingampally, R.R.Dist. 7 Chennamma, W/o Buddanna, 45 years, R/o Madapur (V), Sherilingampally, R.R.Dist. .....PETITIONER(S) AND 1 State of A.P., Rep by Secretary, Revenue Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Dist Collector, R.R.Dist, Hyderabad. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division, R.R.Dist Domalaguda, Hyderabad. 4 Mandal Revenue Officer, Sherilingampally (M), R.R.Dist. (R4 impleaded per court order dt 10-10-96 in WPMP.No.25050/96) .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS directing the respondents to deliver the physical possession of the housing plots to the petitioners in S.No.87 situated at Madapur Village, Sherlingampally (M), R.R.Dist as per the proceedings of the 2nd respondent in the file No.D/4217/89 dt:18.2.93. Counsel for the Petitioner :MR.M.JANARDHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: When the matter came up for hearing on 05-08-2004, neither the petitioners nor their Counsel was present. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed on 12.08.2004. On that day, Mr. M.Krishna Reddy Counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the case bundle was taken away by the parties. Therefore, this Court directed the Registry to issue notices to the petitioners. Thereafter, Mr. M.Janardhanarao, Advocate accepted Vakalat on behalf of the petitioners. When the matter came up today none appears for the petitioners nor is there any representation on their behalf. Therefore, it is presumed that the petitioners have no interest to prosecute the case. Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed for default. No costs. 07-10-2004 Mrkr To 1.The Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 2.The District Collector, Rangareddy District, Khairatabad, Hyderabad. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division, Domalguda,Ranga Reddy District , Hyderabad. 4. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Sherilingampally Mandal, Rangareddy District. 5. Two C.Cs. to the G.P. for revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (O.U.T). 6. Two C.D.copies