IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.7023 of 2009(O&M) Date of Decision 15.12.2009 Paramjit Kaur ...... Petitioner VERSUS Atul Mittal and another ...... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: None for the petitioner. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J(ORAL): Aggrieved against the order dated 08.10.2009, passed by Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division),Talwandi Sabo, whereby DW Atul Mittal has been discharged, the petitioner-defendant (herein referred as 'the petitioner') has preferred this petition. Having perused the impugned order, it transpires that the witness DW Atul Mittal was discharged on account of the fact that neither the defendant nor his counsel was present to examine him. This revision petition being not maintainable is dismissed. In any case, the witness having been discharged does not mean that the Court has refused to entertain such witness. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 15.12.2009 mamta-II