AB 1076/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE P.K.MUSAHARY Heard Mr. M. Sarania, learned counsel for the accused/petitioner as well as Mr. K. Munir, learned Addl. P.P. Assam. Heard also Mr. T.J.Mahanta,learned counsel appearing for the informant-wife. The accused/petitioner had approached this court earlier by fili ng an application for anticipatory bail being A.B.No.915/2011, which was reject ed by this Court on 20.4.2011, after perusal of the case diary. In the present bail application, it has been stated that a talk of compromise is going on, but the said averments have been denied by the inform ant-wife by filing an affidavit on 20.5.11. She has rather stated that the accus ed/petitioner is maintaining illicit relation with another woman and after obtai ning interim order in the present case, the accused/petitioner is threatening th e informant on several occasions, for which she had to file an ejahar on 4.5.11 which has been registered as North Lakhimpur P.S.Case No. 281/2011 U/s 107 CrPC . The allegation of the informant-wife brought against the accused/petitioner by filing the aforesaid ejahar, has not been den ied by the accused/petitioner. In view of the above, I am not inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to the accused/petitioner. Consequently, the prayer for anticipatory bail stand s rejected. Interim order also stands vacated.