IN THEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARJI AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 1^3 OF 200^ ^. _ _ . _ -. ^ETITIONER: ^ .^y^HULTIWARI S/0 SHRI SURENDRA ^',./$9-.T^WARI AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS .^^•^••''...•••"'PESENTLY WORKING AS SUB- v X'c^ y^y ^- ^y^' '^y RESPONDENTS: '* INSPECTOR KANKER DISTRICT UTTAR BASTAR(C.G.) VERSUS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME (POLICE) D.K.S. BHAWAN MANTRALAYA RAIPUR (C.G.) SUPERITENDENT OF POLICE KANKER DISTRICT UTTAR BASTAR (KANKER) (C.G.) WRIT^ PETITIOJt UNDJiR ARTICLE 227 SE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIOIL OF ITID1A FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN^-HE^ N^ATURE OF MANDAMUS / CERTIORARI ETC OR DIRECTIONIS) / ORDERfS) IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. MAYLII^LEASE TO YOUR LORDSHIP; ycie humble petition of the petitioner named above most B - .. . s^pctfully showeth: - ^- XI-HC-22 ^s, ^wn^s, ^ww. Mcii^y an^r'^T K<-) 3n^ stiiii+'Bfer <m lUt H/- -t- /? Y^ /^ w n^^g iq^sT' .ssn^i Wirwdfef 13-1-2006 Shri Shailendra Shukia, coun^ Shri Vlvek Sharma, P.L., for t|ie respondents. Application for- urgent hearin^ is aiiowed. Hecrd. Learned counset for the pel^tioner submits that th'e petitioner was working as Sub. Inspector and he h^d been posted at lijinker. It is further submitted that vide .order dated 251 been transferred from Kanker to ,] far'. It is also submitted that in a ^ Court passed an order on 14/11/20C] may be passed in this case also. State counsel does notdispu^ Having considered the facts record ond further in view of th| No.4656/05, the respondents are d is 9Jven effect within a period of Tw' order. Accordingly, the petition sta^ds allowed. Consequently, M.W.P. IMo.l41/p6 also stands disposed of. Certifled copy as per rules. Sdf- Fakhruddin Judge +l<<i<-l41l 1TFRTI ^ fest Ti^TC ^? arfSgq sii^?r el for the petitioner. ''10/2005 (Annex.P/l) the petitioner had ''cmjgir and he has not been relieved so iimilar matter i.e. W.P. No.4656/05, this 15. Coimsel proys that the similar order e the fact. and circumstances and the material on i order passed by this Court in W.P. irected to pass appropriate orders and take steps to ensure that the impug^ed order dated 25/10/2005 (/tnnex.P/1) ^ weeks from the date of receipt.of this