1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4481 of 2011. Gangai Bahuuddeshiya Gramin Vikas Sanstha ..vs.. National Council for Teacher Edu. New Delhi through its Member and anr. =-=-==-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr. B.G.Kulkarni, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr. N.W.Sambre, Govt.Pleader for the respondents. C ORAM : D.D.SINHA AND A.P.BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : 14th NOVEMBER, 2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Government Pleader for the respondents. The writ petition is directed against the order dated 8/3/2010 as well as 27/8/2010 passed by respondent nos.1 and 2 whereby the proposal of the petitioner for grant of recognition to B.Ed. (Marathi) (C-Ed) course for one year duration came to be rejected on the following ground which reads thus - “The institute is having land on private lease basis is not acceptable as per provisions of NCTE Regulations, 2007” which is reflected in the order dated 8/3/2010. In Order dated 27/8/2010 passed by NCTE (Appellate 2 Authority), it is observed in para-4 of the said order, the relevant portion thereof reads thus - “Since the applicant was having land on private lease at the time of submission of an application, the Council came to the conclusion that WRC was justified in refusing recognition and therefore the appeal deserves to be rejected and the order of WRC confirmed.” The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has purchased the land on 4/9/2009 and therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to submit a fresh proposal to NCTE for permission to start the said course. On the backdrop of the above referred facts, we dispose of the petition with liberty as prayed for. It is for the NCTE to consider the proposal of the petitioner on its own merit and in accordance with law and procedure applicable in this regard and therefore, we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. JUDGE JUDGE. chute 3