[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.3372 OF 2008 Chandrakant Manilal Doshi ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.Shakuntala Wadkar advocate for applicant Mr.K.V.Saste A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 24, 2008 DATE : SEPTEMBER 24, 2008 DATE : SEPTEMBER 24, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard both sides. 2. The applicant was granted bail in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like amount. Bail was granted in CR No.3 of 2005 of EOW, Mumbai. The learned advocate for the applicant states that on account of the financial condition of the applicant, he is unable to furnish the requisite surety. The learned advocate for the applicant stated that as the applicant is unable to furnish surety, he has been languishing in jail, hence, it is prayed that the applicant may be released on provisional cash bail or P.R. bond. I am not [-2-] inclined to release the applicant on provisional cash bail or P.R. bond, however, I am inclined to reduce the surety amount from Rs.25,000/- to Rs.15,000/- with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The surety amount is reduced to Rs.15,000/- from Rs. 25,000/-. The applicant to furnish surety of Rs.15,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount. 3. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]