WP(C) 6004/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE AK GOSWAMI Heard Mr. M.U Mondal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Ahme d, learned Standing counsel, Irrigation Department. The grievance of the petitioner is that her late husband, namely, Sujit Kumar Da s had carried out certain works allotted to him by the respondents and he had su ccessfully completed the works allotted to him. Though he was entitled to a sum of Rs.2,54,394/- on account of the same, the respondent authorities have not pai d the aforesaid amount to him. The petitioner contends that the amount of Rs. 2, 54,394/- is an admitted amount and being the legal heir of Late Sujit Kumar Das, she is entitled to receive the aforesaid amount. Dr. Ahmed submits that the instant case is squarely covered by the Full Bench ju dgment of this Court rendered on 29/9/2008 in Writ Appeal No.484/2005 (Tamsher A li and Ors. Vs. State of Assam and Ors), reported in 2008 (4) GLT 1 (FB) and sim ilar other 194 Writ petitions and, as such, the respondent authorities will exam ine the claim of the petitioner in the light of the principles enunciated in the aforesaid judgment. Mr Mondal also also agrees with the submission of Dr. Ahmed. In view of the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, this writ pet ition is disposed of at the motion stage itself with a direction to the Chief En gineer, Irrigation Department, to examine the claim of the petitioner within a p eriod of 15 days from today and if the claim is admitted, the respondent authori ties would process the claim of the petitioner in accordance with law and in the light of the directions contained in Tamsher Ali and Ors (supra). The writ petition stands disposed of in terms of the above directions.