IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2530 of 2006 MOST.NIRMALA DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR with MJC No.2531 of 2006 MOST.NIRMAL DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 12. 20.08.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel No.4 for the State. In the supplementary show causes filed by the opposite party no. 9, it has been stated that an amount of Rs. 88,801/- was payable to the petitioner till 31.3.1994 and thereafter on 6.4.1994 authorization was issued by the District Provident Fund Officer, Nalanda for an amount of Rs. 91,786/- and thus, as a matter of fact, Rs. 2985/- has been paid in excess to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner on the other hand, submits that there have been certain calculation mistakes and higher rates of interest for the year 1974-75 and certain bonuses were also payable to the petitioner but have not been paid. From the materials on the record, it does not appear that there is any willful disobedience of the order of this Court. However, if there has been any mistake of calculation or any order for recovery is issued by the authorities or any other amount is due according to the petitioner, then it would be open to the petitioner to approach the authorities and get the calculation of his GPF or other amounts decided in accordance with law. Both the applications are accordingly disposed of. 2 S.Pandey (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.)