IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25268 of 2009 1. SUSHIL BHAGAT 2. CHUN CHUN BHAGAT 3. PAPPU BHAGAT @ PAPPI BHAGAT 4. SUSHIL BHAGAT SUSHIL BHATAT Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- W i t h Cr.Misc. No.1984 of 2009 1. BEBI DEVI 2. BUDHANI DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 26/10/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners 1 to 3 in Cr. Misc. No.25268/09 are stated to be the brothers of the husband of the deceased. Petitioner No.4 is the husband of the sister of petitioner Nos.1 to 3. The petitioners in Cr. Misc. No.1984/09 are stated to be the married sister of the husband and the wife of petitioner No.3 in Cr. Misc. No.25268/09. The allegations are under Sections-304B and 201/34 of I.P.C. Other family members of the husband are acknowledged to have been granted anticipatory bail. The application is rejected insofar as petitioners-1 to 3 in Cr. Misc. No.25268/09 are concerned. Considering that petitioner No.4 is stated 2 not to belong to the family of the deceased with generalized allegations and that the petitioners in Cr. Misc. No.1984/09 be married ladies, residing in their own matrimonial home and standing in the position of a daughter-in-law themselves like the deceased in the matrimonial home, both with generalized allegations, let them surrender before the court below within four weeks when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) each along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No.196/08, subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. Any application for regular bail on behalf of petitioners 1 to 3 in Cr. Misc. No.25268/09 shall be considered on its own merits including grant of regular bail to other family members, without being prejudiced by the present order. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.) 3