IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16660 of 2010 BHUTAY YADAV @ BHUTWA @ PRAYAG LAL YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 21.05.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The defence of the petitioner in a Police case under Sections 25(1-B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act is of custody since 9.10.2009 for alleged recovery of a loaded country made weapon with two cartridges. He is acknowledged that he has antecedents of four more cases including under Section 395 of the Penal Code. Considering the period of custody, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 40,000/- (Forty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of SDJM, Birpur Camp Supaul in Nirmali PS Case No. 44 of 2009. Both the sureties must be his mother and sister respectively whose photographs and proof of residence shall be appended to the bail bonds to be verified through the local Police before final acceptance. Till final acceptance of the bail bonds the petitioner is required to be physically present on each date. In the event that he absconds hindering the trial, the court below shall be at liberty to proceed against the sureties also if circumstances so warrant. If the petitioner fails to be properly represented on a single date or fails to physically appear on the direction of the Court the trial court shall retain the discretion to deal with him appropriately notwithstanding the present order. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)