c^ :&5(t^ *:;ss., IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH •^o^ W.P.(S) No 2010 PETITIONER Smt. Rashmi Ranjana Bansiyar W/o Shri N. C, Bansiyar, Aged about 45 years, Occupation - Principal Govt. Girls H. Secondary School Bhilai - 3 Bhilai Distt. Durg (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS .1^^ ^^^^' ^y^y ^' ^•'J^ '?-•••' "\ •^\'y-'- 1. StateofChhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2." Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur /- (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer District Durg (CG) 0»- WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA „!.„. an^l^I Pi-ii.+ sii^g ^qNFi"Htid -S^ ^|t|ld'4, yfll-M'ia. f««11'M1< 3TI^?T 'Vf^K M.'.£.:L^..\.Q&-Vl^ /Co "-V wwti shiirai IN^sr' ail^I ^aiWdfOT SB : HOS'BLB MR. JUSTICB PRtTINKER DIWAKBR 06.12.2010 Shri Vipin Tiwari, counsel for Shri Ajit Singh, P.L. for the St Counsel for the petitioner entitled to benefit of two advance having passed B.Ed. examination cost. It is submitted that the issue nd longer res integra and the samf Honlsle Supreme Court in the case & Ors. 2009 (III)MPJR (SC) 59. Ithe petitioner, jate. submits that the petitioner is increments on account of she |fter her appointment at her own linvolved in the present petition is has been finally decided by the bfAsha Saiiena Vs. State ofM.P. It is further submitted that t| view in its order dated 6.2.2009 p| Counsel for the petitioner furthe^ 29.4.2010 passed in Writ Appeal upon the judgment of the Supreme (supra) and the order passed by thi^ 87/2009, directions have been issu^d grant of two advance increments issued by the State of Madhya Pracff pleaded in the petition. CounseS for the State subiti would also be considered on the sarhe In view of above, the petitior) the respondent authorities to dec4 grant of two advance increments <»)i*fF(n41i +ii+idf'^^t^l ^•^ii ^? aipgtl SIT^I lis Court has also taken a similar Sissed in W.P.(S) No. 6257/2008. submits that the order dated N0. 124/2009, wherein relying Court in the case of Asba Saxena Court in another Writ Aooeal No. for consideration of the case for as per circular dated 21.9.1974 ish, after verification ot' the facts its that case of the petitioners lines. is disposed of with a direction to ie the claim of the petitioner for as per circular dated 21.9.1974 ;'nrt 'ff^n r . <B3V1 &, %^_-s^^ '^3K^'^?" ";®<B£s»<!y' ;-22 SfI^IW l<-li<<i 311^1 StiHlfl 'ffl^B ftl' -s^ ^IFIRTO, •^ftwis. RKiwy *||<1CTI chll<»i i'n^ST ira^? .l&!;..€^.a.l.^.;'LC'^/&> "Wi, 21 'fN^a' 3ii^T ^giwgf??! issued by the State of Madhya Prac pleaded in the petition within a perii It is made clear that this Cou on merits of the case and the autho; to decide the aame strictly in accorciftnce ^1^^41-1 tlt*lfft' ^ fe^ft •d^rt^T< ^; 3]pg>? SIR^I lesh after verification of the facts kd of eight weeks from foday. 'rt has not expressed any opinion hity concemed wouid be at Uberty with law. ~~ .. .,..s(^- prituikwD, Judge '^aAai F'nA ^fkrs