IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-30802 of 2011 Date of Decision : 12th December, 2011 Darshan Lal Tatial .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. Rajinder Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shilesh Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Ashwani Kumar, states that petitioner is on parity with co-accused who have been granted anticipatory bail or were allowed to join proceedings vide orders Annexure p-6 to P-12. It is also stated that pursuant to order of this Court, petitioner has since joined the investigation. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner appeared in the trial Court on 24.10.2011 and furnished bail bond for interim bail. In view of the aforesaid, without meaning to express any opinion on merits of the case, the instant petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. Interim order dated 12.10.2011 is made absolute. 12th December, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) 'raj' JUDGE