: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.252 OF 2003 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.600 OF 2001 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s Orders of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders ------------------------------------------------------------------ Ms Shubhangi Kadam i.b S.G.Deshmukh for applicant Mr.Vivek Salunke for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 Mr.Vijay Patil for Respdt No.4 CORAM : P.V.KAKADE, J. DATE : 16TH SEPTEMBER, 2005 P.C.: . Heard the learned counsel for the applicant as well as respondents including the proposed Respondent No.4. Perused the record. . This is an application to join the proposed Respondents to the proceeding on the ground that subsequently they have become interested in the property as : 2 : contended in paras 3 and 4 of the application,which in my view requires consideration and proposed Respondents 1 to 4 become necessary party in order to adjudicate the dispute effectively pertaining to the suit property. . Hence the application is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). so far as prayer clauses (c) and (d) are concerned the parties are directed to maintain status-quo with regard to the suit property. Liberty to the concerned parties to move the court independently for revise relief, if any. With this direction the application stands disposed of with no order as to costs.