IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19017 of 2011 Sachidanand Pandey Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02/ 30.06.2011 Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 20.3.2010 in a case instituted under sections 392 and 411/34 of the IPC. Allegedly, petitioner and one co-accused Uma Dubey were caught at the spot just after the alleged occurrence but submission on behalf of the petitioner is that the informant could not identify the petitioner before the trial court which is evident from perusal of annexure 3 to the supplementary affidavit. It is also pointed out by him that co-accused Uma Dubey has already been granted privilege of bail by this court. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Sachidanand Pandey, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in Kutumba P.S. Case no. 18/2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)