IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28449 of 2010 Rajiv Chaudhary, son of Sri Shankar Chaudhry, R/o – village – Saidpur, P.S. – Maithani, District – Begusarai. ---- Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Sarita Devi, D/o – Sri Mohan Chaudhry, resident of village – Nimachanpura, P.S. – Nimachanpura, District – Begusarai. ---- Opposite Parties. ***** 02. 22.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named accused in this case complaint case being husband of the complainant with allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. The couple has one male child as it appears from the order of learned Sessions Judge there is some scope of reconciliation. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, on the event of filing an application before the court below by the petitioner expressing his desire to resume and continue matrimonial life with the complainant and also make payment of Rs. 500/- by way of ad interim maintenance to the complainant subject to any order by competent authority on the point or any agreement between the parties and begin with the payment, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within - 2 - four weeks of receipt of the copy of this order, petitioner, namely, Rajiv Chaudhary, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Begusarai, in connection with Complaint Case No. 2490C/2008, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case, in case of failure on three consecutive dates and single default in payment, the liberty shall be deemed to be cancelled. It is further made clear that in the event of any positive response by the complainant, court below shall permit the couple to reside with the petitioner at the petitioner’s place, court below shall have regular watch over the conduct of the parties for a reasonable period and being satisfied pass appropriate order in accordance with law. Rajeev/ (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)