: 1 : 3115-11-wp=.sxw USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3115 OF 2011 Govindrao Ramchandra Jadhav .. Petitioner v/s. Vasantrao Ramchandra Jadhav Since deceased through his LRs & Ors. .. Respondents ......... Mr. Amit B. Borkar for the petitioner Mr. Aniket U. Nikam for the respondents ......... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J DATE : 14th OCTOBER,2011. P.C. : 1. Heard learned advocates on both sides. The R.C. Suit No.1192 of 2000 filed in the Court of learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kolhapur is pending. Evidence of the plaintiff is over. Evidence of one witness on behalf of the defendants is over. At this stage, application is filed by the heirs of original defendants who are on record to produce certain documents. That application has been granted by the learned trial Judge by order dated 6th February, 2011. This order is challenged in this petition. 2. The learned Judge has granted the said application. After having : 2 : 3115-11-wp=.sxw considered the record, I am inclined to observe that it is difficult to stop a party from producing documents. The only thing is those documents should be proved in accordance with the provisions of law. Surely, the documents having been produced after the evidence of one witness is over, it will be open for the contesting defendants to prove those documents through some other witness and certainly not through the witness whose examination is already over. Recalling of such a witness is unconceivable in the facts and circumstances of the case. In view of this, no interference is required. It is noticed that the suit was originally filed in the year 1992. Thereafter, it has been renumbered in the year 2000. Since then, it is pending. This is a suit for partition. Hence, it is necessary to pass an order directing the learned trial Judge to hear and dispose of the suit by 30th June, 2012. Parties will have to co-operate with the learned trial Judge. Hence, following order is passed. ORDER (i) Subject to the aforesaid clarification, no interference is required in the impugned order. Learned Judge before whom R.C. Suit No.1192 of 2000 is pending shall hear and dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible and preferably on or before 30th June, 2012. Petition is accordingly disposed of. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)