@ $§mgm gmmh i (ff/ai L— IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P.(5) NO. 5796 / 2006 PeTiTioner‘ SmfAnnapur‘na Singh Pawar/ W/o Shri 5.5.Pawar, Aged abouT 46 year's, Upper Division Téachér, 60w. Higher Secondary School, Jamnipali N.T.P.C. Korba, DisT : Kor‘ba-(C.G.) Responden‘rs :1. Sfa’re of Chhcn‘fisgar'h Through - The Secrefar'y, DeparTmenT of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawun, RaipUF, Dis’r : Rqipur-(C.G,) 2. Dis’rr‘icf Education Officer, Disf : Korba—(C.G.) Assf. Commissioner Tribol Welfare Deparfmem‘, Dis‘l’ : Korba-(C.6.) 4. Block Educafion Officer, Kafghora, isf : Korba-(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE ) 1¢§ONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT, WRITS, DIRECTION ETC TO DO JUSTICEIIN THE MATTER. NW / D U i J ' _i @ §IIGH GQMRT OF GHHATTESGARH A? BJLA§5PUR SINGLE BENCH : HGN’BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHGTR! J. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is working as Upper Division Teacher in the Government Higher Secondary School, Jamnipaii, District Korba. in the course of her service. the petttioner passed BEd. Examination on 27-3-1 99? at her own expenses. r e 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies on the decision of this Court in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another”, wherein it has been heid that the Teachers, having obtained B.Ed., M.Ed., B.T.l. Certificates, at their own expenses, would be entitled to two advance increments. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the decision in the matter of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj (Supra). Learned WRIT PETiTiON (5,) No.51 98 OF 2006 Petitioner : Smt. Annapurna Singh Pawar versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and others Present : Mr. A.S.Rajput, counsei for the petitioner. Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Government Advocate for the respondents/State. ORDER (Passed on 3a of October, 2005) counse! appearing for the {espondents/$tate faifiy concedes ts the position and agrees with the statements made by iearned counsei for the petitioner. ' WWA 3. Accordingiy, this petition is aiiowed in tetms of the decision of this Court in the matter of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj (Supra), ‘subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B.Ed. Certificate at her own expenses and further whether she has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. § sw— Satish K. Agnihotr‘i Judge Certitied copy as per ruies. 1 2006 (H) MPJR‘CG 96 Gopai r *‘/«¥ F h A