IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 4778 of 2011 Date of decision : 16.03.2011 Gurnam Singh ...Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Ms. Naiya Gill, Advocate for the petitioner. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) The pointed grievance emanating from the record is that although, the Director, Rural Development and Panchayats, Punjab (respondent No.2) has directed the B.D.P.O, Bathinda (respondent No.5) to elect acting Panch, vide order dated 11.02.2011 (Annexure P-3), but no action has yet been taken in this regard. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, going through the record, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.5 to comply the directions contained in order (Annexure P-3), within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order, failing which he will be responsible for the resultant consequences. Copy of this order be given dasti to learned counsel for petitioner under the signatures of Reader attached to this Court. March 16, 2011 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) naresh.k Judge