IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.667 of 2009 Shankar Sharma @ Shiv Sankar Sharma & Anr Versus Bhikhari Sharma & Ors . For petitioners: Ram Awdhesh Singh. For Opposite Parties: Mr. Shrinandan Pd.Singh,Adv. Mr.Ashok Kumar. Mr.Surendra Prasad Singh, Adv. ---------------------------------- 03. 19.12.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. By the impugned order, the learned court below has rejected the prayer of the defendants for rejection of plaint. The defendants, who are petitioners in this revision application filed a petition for rejection of plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. on the basis that the plaintiff has not filed the copy of the sale deed which was the basis of the suit and as such the plaint was fit to be rejected. The plaintiffs, in reply, has submitted that the sale deed in question is in possession of the defendants themselves and the plaintiff has applied for obtaining the certified copy of the sale deed and would file the same when it would be supplied. After hearing the parties and perusing the impugned order, it appears that the court below has rightly held that the plaint cannot be rejected in the fact facts and 2 circumstances of the case. I do not find any illegality or jurisdictional error in the impugned order. The revision application is, accordingly, dismissed. Nitesh ( V. Nath, J.)