1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5005 OF 2005 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1938 OF 2006 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS... APPLICANTS Versus M/s. PRIYANKA ENTERPRISES & ANR.. RESPONDENTS Mr. K.K. Tated, AGP Mr. G.S. Godbole for respondents CORAM:-SMT. RANJANA DESAI & SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED:-19/8/2006 P.C. . On 5th December, 2005, this Court passed the following order: "1. Heard the learned AGP for applicants 2. Rule. Rule made returnable on 03/04/2006. Pending further orders, there shall be ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b) subject to the condition that the Applicants shall 2 deposit the entire decreetal amount within a period of twelve weeks from today." 2. We have heard Mr. Tated, learned AGP for the applicants and Mr. Godbole, learned counsel for the respondents. 3. Mr. Tated says that as directed by this court the amount has been deposited by the applicants in the trial court. Mr. Godbole, learned counsel for respondents however, disputes this fact. He states that the entire decretal amount is not deposited as ordered but there is some deficit. This disputed question can only be sorted out by the executing court. Hence, we direct the executing court to decide this question within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order by it. 4. In view of the statement made by Mr. Tated, the ad-interim relief granted on 5-12-05 is confirmed. 5. Needless to say that in case the executing court comes to a conclusion that the applicants have not deposited the entire amount as ordered and 3 there is some deficit, the applicant shall make good that deposit and the above order will be subject to the applicants paying the deficit amount, if so ordered. 6. Civil application is disposed of. (SMT. RANJANA DESAI,J.) (SMT.) V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)