IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-4193 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 16, 2011 Sangeetha and another .................................................. Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .......................................... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Mahesh Dheer, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Munish Kumar, AAG, Punjab, for respondents No.1 to 4. ... RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the matter has been duly compromised between the parties and the petitioners do not apprehend any danger from respondents No.5 to 8. In the reply filed by the official respondents, statements of the petitioners have been recorded to the effect that they do not require police protection. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed. Disposed of. 16.3.2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Rupi JUDGE