\ n -,li IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI MACA No.269/2010 Date of Decision: Auoust 3L, 2010 RAM BTLASH .....Appellant through Mr. S.N.Parashar, Advocate versus AN|L K,MAR tt'HHS"^fi:s L Gupta; ftl;:5,Tf"?'ll:, CORAM: HON'BLE MISS JIJSTICE REKHA SHARMA 1. Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the 'Digest'? REKHA SHARMA, J. (ORAL) It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant has not been adequately compensated on account of loss of enjoyment of amenities of life, the medical expenses incurred by him and the amount spent on conveyance and special diet. Having regard to the fact that the appellant remained in the hospital on different occasions for a total of 134 days, I award him a sum of { 25,000/- towards loss of enjoyment of amenities of life, a sum of T L5,000/- towards medical expenses and a sum of t 10,000/- towards conveyance and special diet over and above what has already been awarded to him under these heads by the Claims Tribunal. ln all, J 4.s5'rr , MACA No.269/2010 Page 1 of 2 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified 7 a the appellant is awarded a fufther shall also be entitled to interest on annum from the date of filing of the The appeal is disposed of. AUGUST 3]., 2O1O ka sum of T 50,000/-. The the enhanced amount @ petition. REK appellant 7.5%o per i" MACA No.269/2010 Page2 of.2