... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4310 OF 2003 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.717 OF 2004 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri R.V. Govilkar for the Applicant. Shri Mattos with Smt G.P. Mulekar, A.G.P.for the Respondent No.1. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : JULY 28, 2006. : JULY 28, 2006. : JULY 28, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocates appearing for the parties. Prayer (a) cannot be granted as the impugned decree is of the dismissal of the suit filed by the Applicant. So far as prayer (b) is concerned, a statement has been made in the companion Civil Application No.4339 of 2003 that the first Respondent has already completed construction of the building. In view of the said statement, interim relief in terms of prayer (b) cannot be granted. Hence, Application is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE