1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1760 OF 2002 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1760 OF 2002 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1760 OF 2002 WITH WITH WITH CRI. W.P.NOS. 1761, 1762 & 1763 OF 2002 CRI. W.P.NOS. 1761, 1762 & 1763 OF 2002 CRI. W.P.NOS. 1761, 1762 & 1763 OF 2002 Mr.Md.Ghulam Ghouse & Anr. .. Petitioners. V/s. Lloyds Finance Ltd., & Anr. .. Respondents. ----- Shri Nitin Pradhan for Petitioners. Shri R.Y. Mirza, APP for Respondent No.2- State. ----- CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : DECEMBER 01, 2004 DATED : DECEMBER 01, 2004 DATED : DECEMBER 01, 2004 PC :- PC :- PC :- . Shri Nitin Pradhan, learned counsel for the Petitioners in all the above petitions, submits that all these petitions were filed before the recent decision of the Apex Court in Adalat Prasad’s case. He submits that the remedy of recall of process in the light of the recent decision, which was pressed into service on behalf of the petitioners, is unavailable. In the circumstances, he prays that all these petitions be permitted to be withdrawn, as the petitioners have been advised to take recourse to the substantive remedy of quashing by way of petitions 2 under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with section 482 of Cr.P.C., before this Court. Accordingly, these petitions are dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the Petitioners for taking recourse to the remedy of quashing, if so advised. . Ordered accordingly. .....