IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43258 of 2010 1. RAMANAND SHUKLA, S/o Late Hardeo Shukla. 2. Vikash Shukla. 3. Sonu Kumar Shukla, Both Sons of Ajay Shukla. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 14.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that apart from the confessional statement of the co-accused there is no cogent material against them. The further submission is that the petitioners are in custody since 19.05.2010 and there is only one other case pending against them. Considering the same, let the petitioners, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-I, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with S.Tr. No. 282 of 2010 arising out of Sasaram G.R.P.S. Case No. 11 of 2010 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related 2 with the petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioners. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)