1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR First Apppeal No.456 of 2009 (Western Coalfields Ltd. ..V/s.. Shankar Chambhare) Mr. S.P. Agrawal & A. Jambholkar, counsel for appellant. Mr. O.W. Gupta, Mr. W.G. & M.W. Charde, counsel for respondent. With First Appeal No.457 of 2009 (Western Coalfields Ltd. ..V/s.. Maruti Awari) Mr. S.P. Agrawal & A. Jambholkar, counsel for appellant. Mr. O.W. Gupta, Mr. W.G. & M.W. Charde, counsel for respondent. With First Appeal No.461 of 2009 (Western Coalfields Ltd. ..V/s.. Ganpat Dahule +1) Mr. S.P. Agrawal & A. Jambholkar, counsel for appellant. Mr. O.W. Gupta, Mr. W.G. & M.W. Charde, counsel for respondent. With First Appeal No.462 of 2009 (Western Coalfields Ltd. ..V/s.. Anandrao Bawne) Mr. S.P. Agrawal & A. Jambholkar, counsel for appellant. Mr. O.W. Gupta, Mr. W.G. & M.W. Charde, counsel for respondent. With First Appeal No.463 of 2009 (Western Coalfields Ltd. ..V/s.. Smt. Shantabai Belkhude) Mr. S.P. Agrawal & A. Jambholkar, counsel for appellant. Mr. O.W. Gupta, Mr. W.G. & M.W. Charde, counsel for respondent. 2 With First Appeal No.489 of 2009 (Western Coalfields Ltd. ..V/s.. Dinkar Milmile +1) Mr. M. Anilkumar, Mr.S.P. Agrawal & A. Jambholkar, counsel for appellant. With First Appeal No.338 of 2009 (Western Coalfields Ltd. ..V/s.. Gajanan Besekar through L.Rs.) Mr. S.C. & A.S. Mahadia, counsel for appellant. With First Appeal No.627 of 2009 (Western Coalfields Ltd. ..V/s.. Maruti Awari) Mr. S.C. & A.S. Mahadia, counsel for appellant. Mr. W.G. Charde, counsel for respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. Coram: C. L. PANGARKAR J. Dated : 26th August 2009 Heard the learned counsel for the appellant as well as the respondent. In view of the decision rendered by this Court in First Appeal No.166 of 1996, these appeals cannot be admitted, since the 3 question is concluded by the judgment of this Court. It was contended on behalf of the appellant that the respondent cannot be paid the amount which is deposited in the Court since they are not ready to deliver the possession. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that property is already vested in the acquiring body and the acquiring body is at liberty to take the possession at any moment. In view of this submission of the learned counsel for the respondent, I see no difficulty in paying the amount, which is deposited in the Court, to the respondent. Judge. nvt