W.P. No. 1635 (ss)01 (Old No. 24509 of 1999) Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri K.K. Tewari, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Counsel for the parties have submitted that the controversy raised by means of this writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court delivered on 30.04.03 passed writ petition no. 3615(ss)2001 (Deepak Chandra vs. Basic Kiksha Adhikari, Pithoragarh) and w.p. no. 1243(ss)2001 (Dinesh Singh Rawat and ors. vs. State of U.P. and ors.) as such, the present writ petition may also be disposed of on the same terms and observations expressed in the aforesaid judgment. In view of the aforesaid statement the present writ petition is also disposed of on the same terms and observations made in writ petition no. 3615(ss) 2001 (Deepak Chandra vs. Basic Kiksha Adhikari, Pithoragarh) and w.p. no. 1243(ss)2001 (Dinesh Singh Rawat and ors. vs. State of U.P. and ors.) delivered on 30.04.2003. (M.M. Ghildiyal, J.) 07.04.2006: NCM: