IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34123 of 2008 DURGESH SAH & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 15.09.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are accused in a case for the offences registered under Sections 420, 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. The allegations are against the accused persons named in the First Information Report who are alleged to have purchased the gold chain from the nephew of the informant. The other co- accused, namely, Vinod Sah and Raju Sah on the submission of the charge sheet they were tried. However, the trial ended in acquittal. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State, on the other hand, is not in a position to refute the submission made above. Considering the submissions as made above, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioners, namely, Durgesh Sah and Ranjan Sah be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj, in connection with Majhagarh P.S. Case No. 227 of 2007 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sym ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)