IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No.34039 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 11, 2011 Suraj ...Petitioner Versus Union Territory, Chandigarh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Pankaj Middha, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The allegations against the petitioner and his co-accused are that they have waylaid and taken away the purse of the complainant containing `200/-. He did not lodge any complaint. Subsequently, he noticed one of the assailant at a place where he summoned the police and accordingly it led to arrest of the co- accused. The petitioner's name has, therefore, surfaced. The allegations against the petitioners are under Section 392 IPC. Not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Dismissed. November 11, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE