IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5864 of 2010 RAJESH SINGH @ RAJESH KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 26/02/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The defence in a police case under Sections 302/34 of the Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act is that the F.I.R. states two known persons entered the shop and who fired, four others unknown stood outside. Co-accused similarly situated is stated to have been enlarged on bail in Cr. Misc. No. 48525 of 2007. The impugned order of rejection from the case diary does not notice the nature of involvement of the petitioner so to deny him similar treatment as co- accused granted bail. Let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J.- III, Barh, Patna in connection with Mokama P.S. Case No. 102 of 2005, S.Tr. No. 514 of 2007. P.K. ( Navin Sinha, J.)