IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17832 of 2010 1. RADHEY PASWAN. 2. PRAMOD PASWAN. BOTH SONS OF PRADEEP PASWAN. 3. AKLU PASWAN, SON OF LATE BIHARI PASWAN. ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BOARIDIH TOLA, MUNNI KALAYAN, P.S. GAIGHAT, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR…………………………..PETITIONERS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR……………OPPOSITE PARTY. ---------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Neeraj Kumar @ Sanidh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. U.S.P. Singh, A.P.P. --------- 2. 12.5.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The prayer for bail of the petitioners had earlier been rejected vide order dated 10.11.2009 passed in Criminal Misc. No.34307 of 2009, which is appended as Annexure-‘1’ to this application. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against the - 2 - petitioners of assaulting the father of the informant which resulted in his death. It is submitted that the co-accused , Ganeshi Paswan and Bhukhlu Paswan, who are on similar footing to that of the petitioners, had already been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 21.4.2010 passed in Criminal Misc. No.12240 of 2010, which is appended as Annexure-‘4’ to this application. The petitioners are stated to be in custody since 4.6.2009. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioners, namely, (1) Radhey Paswan, (2) Pramod Paswan and (3) Aklu Paswan, are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Smt. Anandita Singh, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Gaighat P.S. Case No.10/2009, with a further condition that one of the bailors in case of each of the petitioners must be the close relative or family members of the petitioners. Further, the petitioners shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial in the court below. If the petitioners fail to remain present on two consecutive - 3 - dates during the course of the trial, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)