IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7594 of 2009 BINOD RAI son of Bindeshwar Rai, resident of Village Itahan Rasulnagar, P.S. Sakra, Distt. Muzaffarpur. ----- Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 5.11.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The offence alleged against the petitioner, who is an accused in connection with Sakara P.S. Case No.94 of 2008, is under section 452/376 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that although specific allegation has been made against the petitioner of committing rape, but the complainant has filed the case on account of the land dispute as indicated in the complaint itself. It is further submitted that the filing of the complaint is an after-thought as the complainant did not want to lodge the case against the petitioner to the police station, which was only four kilometers away from the house of the complainant and after delay of about one day, she filed the present complaint in the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur. It is further submitted that there is no medical report on the record to support the allegation. The learned counsel appearing for the State on perusal of the case diary submits that there is specific allegation against the petitioner of committing rape and the allegations have been found true during investigation. Considering the nature of the allegations and the 2 submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. This application is, accordingly, rejected. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)