IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.9062 of 2010 ASHOK RAM, son of late Naresh Ram Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 16.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under section 25(1-B) A/26 of the Arms Act. It has been submitted that when the police chased the miscreants they threw the arms and fled away. The chaukidar disclosed the name of the present petitioner as being one of the persons, who had fled away. Taking into consideration the fact that there has been no recovery from the possession of the petitioner, who is in custody since 18.5.2009, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Barh, Patna, in connection with Saksohara P.S. case no.07 of 2006, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date - 2 - fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (iv) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)