:;s-s3F: •3!ft''S"^'\ 'iWWesa'-f:' ^<g^ iH COURT Coram : Hon'bie Shri Rajeev Gupta, C.J. & Hon'ble Shri Dhirendra IViishra, J. W.P. (P!U N0.934/200S Diiip Soni, S/o R.L.-'Soni: about 55 ysars, Journalist & Publlsher of Jan Sumit, Shop No. 33, Press Compjex, T.P. Nagar, Korba, Distt. Korba, CG. ,<^^l ^asponosnis Vs State of ChhsttisQarh, Through Secretary, Veterinary Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt, Raipur, (CG). 2 The Director, Veterinary Ser/ice Raipur - (CG). 18 l^urniii!ti rt, Raii iaipur, CG. itate o' ;ecretap/ tfi< ,f.: of Finance r\.. ir^i ;%/' 5tate Economic and Investiaation Bureau, District Raipur (CG). Present: Shri H.P. Aarawai, learned counsei for the Shri Ki'shore Bhaduri, iearned Addl. dvocate Genera! for respon^ >th —y-ji 'K 'r;:'v ^' Heard learned counse! for the parties on admission. te'<sa" 2. Petitioner - Diiip Soni elaimlng himself to be a Journa has field this writ petition styied as 'Pubiic Interest Litigation' ina reiiefs: "7.1 that, this Hon'ble Court may kind!y b< pieassd to call for the entire records of the case for kind perusal. 7.2 that, this Hon'bie Court may kindiy be pieased to direct respondent No.2 for giving the first Drioritv of the medicines who had Quoted be!ow 7.3 that, this Hon'bie Court may kindiy be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 for permittint the supply of the medicines of Allopathy Feed Suppiement and the Ayun/edic Medicines after sreparation of the comparative chart with .the fleneric name. 7.4 that, this Hon'bie Court may kindly be pieased to reject the tender which has been not demanded by respondent No.2 in list of the Ayurvedic Feed Suppiement. 7.5 that, this Hon'ble Court may kindly bs pleased to direct the respondent No.2 for Initiatin! the iilega! action against the company who has submitted t'ne certificate for supplying the medicines in other nearest State because the rate of the other States has been differ. 7.6 that, this Hon'bie Court may klndiy be pleased to direct the concerned State for supplyins the detaiied report of concerned medicines. If this Hon'ble Court will found the rate difference in suppivina the medicines then the iegal action wi!i initiate against the concerned companies. I :«i»^y 1 in .l^'^-"' l:hat; this Hon'bte Court may kindiy be pjeased to reject the tsnder form of ths companies who had not submitted with the compiete documents as per the tender forms. 7.8 Any other reiief or rellef may aiso be jranted to the petitioner which this Hon'ble Court feels fit in the facts and cireumstances of the case." 3. The petitioner, thus, in substance is alleaina commission of irreguiarities by respondents No. 2 and 3 in purchasing medicines in the veterinary department of the State. 4. For ascertaining the correctness of the allegations made by the petitioner in the writ petition a fact flnding enquiry is necessary. 5. !n our optnion; such a 'ract finding enquiry' can be better conducted bythe Lokayuktv/ho has an investigation wing. in this view ofthe matter, we are ofthe opinion that it 'A'ould be appropriate for the petitioner to approach the Lokayukt for redressal ofthe grievances projectsd in the v/rit petltion. 7. Wlth the above observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. 8. Security amount of Rs.5,000/- deposited by the petitione.r s, ^, Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge