IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25722 of 2009 SANGEETA SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 24.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that after the death of petitioner’s husband after a long ailment, differences cropped up in between the family. Father-in-law of the petitioner with some daughter and son was at one hand and petitioner with two daughters on the other. Several cases were filed on behalf of both the parties. Present case is also one of them. Own daughter will be eliminated on the ground of her opposing the petitioner from any marriage, cannot be believed, that finds strengthened by the fact that if petitioner solemnized any marriage with villager, her two daughters were residing with her. No objection was there from any corner. This marriage is totally denied. The allegation is to administer poisonous suspected to implicate the grand-father and same position is with this petitioner also, she may be falsely implicated in the case either after providing poisonous substance or by obtaining a fake certificate. However, the victim survived at a point of time, parties compromised also but that could not be persuaded rather it is said that the father-in-law deviated from his decision by filing no compromise in the present case. In the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be 2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari in Chhatauni P.S.Case No. 35/2007 (G.R.No. 914/07), subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. A.I (Mandhata Singh, J.)