IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2011 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 1326 of 2011(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER DTD.11/11/2011 IN WPC.29480/2011 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.A.LAILA,W/O.ABOOBACKER, AGED 58 YEARS,MOLATH HOUSE,AMBADIMOOLA, KAKKANAD P.O. KOCHI 30 REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER,ABOOBACKER,S/O.ABDUL RAZACK, AGED 63 YEARS,MOLATH HOUSE,AMBADIMOOLA, KAKKANAD P.O,KOCHI-30 BY ADV. MR.ESM.KABEER RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. MR.SANTHOSH,AGED NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY,THRIKKAKARA MUNICIPALITY, PIN 683 040) 2. ARUNKUMAR K,AGED 46 YEARS, SON OF LATE A.K.RAGHAVAN NAMBIAR, M/S.MIR REALTORS PRIVATE LIMITED, REGISTERED OFFICE AT FIRST FLOOR, M.M. BUILDINGS,ERNAKULAM NORTH,NEAR TOWN HALL, ERNAKULAM PIN 682 018 ADV. MR.S.SHANAVAS KHAN FOR R1 MR.ABRAHAM MATHEW (VETTOOR) FOR R2 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Con.Case(C).No. 1326 of 2011(S) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE A1: CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER IN W.P(C) NO.29480/2011 DATED 11/11/2011 ANNEXURE A11: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT ON 22/11/2011 ANNEXURE AIII: TRUE COPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICE SENT TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT ON 28/11/2011 ANNEXURE AIV: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 28/11/2011 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE-R2(a): NOTICE DTD. 23.11.2011 ISSUED BY S.I. OF POLICE, THRIKKAKKARA POLICE STATION. ANNEXURE-R2(b): MODIFIED NOTICE DTD. 23.11.2011 ISSUED BY S.I. OF POLICE, THRIKKAKKARA POLICE STATION. .... // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE. HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. ------------------------ C.O.C.No.1326 Of 2011 ---------------------- Dated this the 21st day of December, 2011. J U D G M E N T The learned counsel for the 1st respondent on instructions submits that the order has been complied with. It is reported that the 2nd respondent stopped the operation of tower over the petitioner's property and his residential building. The submission of the learned counsel for the 1st respondent is recorded and the Contempt of Court Case is closed. HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge. bkn/-