- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.411 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.411 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.411 OF 2006 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2411 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.2411 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.2411 OF 2006 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Mr.Amil Jambhotkar h/f Mr.M.H.Solkar for the Applicant Mr.Ravi Rasttesar for Respondent No.1 Mr.A.S.Shitole, A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : OCTOBER 9,2006. : OCTOBER 9,2006. : OCTOBER 9,2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocates appearing for the Applicant and for the Respondents. The Advocate for the Respondent No.1 states that he will file Vakalatnama within a period of one week from today. 2. Heard Advocate for the Applicant. Application is opposed by the Advocate for the Respondent No.1. There is sufficient cause for condonation of delay of 20 days. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Place the Application No.2411/2006 on board on 8th December 2006. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE