.-5./ HiQH COURT OF CHHATTiSQARH: BtlASPUR Petitioner ResBO_nde_rts Suklamber Prasad Patei. S/o. Janhavi Prasad Patei, aged about 51 years, Assistant Teacher; Primary School, Jatari, B!ock Pusour, Distriot Raigarh (CG). Vsrsus 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Education, Mantraiaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(CG}. 2) The Director, Pubiio Instructions, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distriot Raipur (CG). 3) District Education Officer, District Raigarh (CG$. 4) Biook Education Offioer, Pusour, Distriot Raigarh (CG$. (Writ Petition under Artioie 226 of the Constitution of India) SB: Hon'bie Mr. SaBsh K. Agnahotri, >J. present Shri SanjayPatei, counsel for fte petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate for the State. [Passed on 12-3- The petit'oner was initially appointed on 2-3-1982 as Assistant Teacher ^>n a fixed pay scale of Rs. 150/- for the period of initiai two years. After compietion of probation, the petitionerwas granted regular pay soaie of Rs. 545/--9257-0n2-3-1984. 2) The question of law invoived herein asto whether the petitioner is entitied to regular pay scale with etfect from t'ne date of initiai appointment or from the date of compietion of probation period. 3$ Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question or' law invotved in ths petitlon are the same to that of Writ Petition (S) No.5976 of 2006 (Sushi! Tiwari S others Vs. Stete of Chhattlsgarh & others), which was aHowed 't -?0>..^^'%. ,9 -2-. vide oraer dated 7-11-2006. Learned counsel further submit that this petition may be disposed of in the same terms. 4) in view of the above-stated submission made by iearned counsei appearing for the parties, the writ petition is altowed in the same terms i.e., the petitioner is entitted to regular pay scale with effect from the date of initiai appointment, subjeot to verification ofthe facts. No order asto costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Raju