-^. gil!ffj r toei?»^ 's^'S'^.^.^ ^.C.?%^?'ii ^(^ 'L IN THE HIGH CQURTLQFJUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P. (S) No. ^1:3 / 2008 7 PETITIONER .v.f^ ^•^..^"/-••""' ,....'-"£^ts ^ly Chinta Ram Yadav, S/o.Late Shri Sukhram Yadav, aged about 43 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Kodia, Block - Dhamdha, Distt.- Durg (C.G.) ><c.; VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^1 ^co^ ^^^^r^ el1sa<-t' VS.GSV^'1""^ 10 A-0' ^,. /" State of Chhattisgrh, Through - The Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Director, Public Instruction Department, Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur District Education Officer Durg, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Dhamdha, Distt. - Durg (C.G.), ^ ^yjss^. t.*UI^A^*c3£^frt^/-;^^^^^i-^a..a"^a£(^L.lA WRIT PETITIPN UNDER ARTICLE 226Q2T2FJHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA DADTinill AOQ np TUP PFTITinNFR *a6i HIGH CQURT <?F CHHATHS6ARH AT BILASPUR Petitionar : Chinta Ram Yadav Versus Respondents Stote of Chhattisgarh ond others SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Present: mr. Vipin Tiwari, Advocate for ine petitioner. tftwr. Sastish respondents/State. , Dy. <Sovt. Adyocate for OR DER Passed on -rtiis 13th &oy of February, 2007) 1. The petitioner was appointed vide order dated 1.7.82 (Annexure P/l) as Assistont Teacher on fixed pay scate of Rs. 150/-. After completion of two years probation, he was grcnted reguiar pay scaie of Rs. 169-300/-. 2. Learned counsei oppearin9 for the petitioner submits that tiie sssue involved in the case is asto whether ths petitioner is sntitled to regular pay scate w.e.f. 1+ie date of initial oppointrpent or after compietion of probation period. 3. The issue involved, herein was considered by 1+)e Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunat, Jabalpur m O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. & others), wherein it WQS held thst the sinnilariy situated teachers are entitled to re9ular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. Tne matter wss taken-up to the Hon'bie Supreme Court. The cppeal was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreine Court upholding the decision of the Tribuna! to the effect that -t+se Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to r%gu!ar pay sco.ie from date of initial 4. Learned counsel appearing for- the petitioners further submits that •rtiis Court, while considering the same issue in Amar Sai Ram & others Vs. State of Chhctt-isgarh &. others (W.P. (S) No. 4725/ 2006) by order dated 1.9.2006, has gronted reguiar" pay scale vu.e.f. the date of initial appointment. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that this case is square!y covered by the decision of this Court in ttie case of Amar Sai Ram S. others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh A others (Supra). B *- igsblu 5. In view of that, this petition is disposed of in the same ternvs. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatisbK.Agmhom Judge