IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Letters Patent Appeal No.1114 of 2009 Date of decision: 7.7.2010 Mahinder Singh and another …..Appellants Versus Superintending Canal Officer, Irrigation Branch and others ……Respondents CORAM: Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jasbir Singh Hon’ble Mr.Justice Augustine George Masih Present: Mr.R.V.S. Chugh, Advocate for the appellants Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral) CM Nos.3007 and 3009 of 2009 In view of reasons mentioned in applications, the same are allowed and delay in filing and re-filing stands condoned. LPA No.1114 of 2009 This appeal has been filed against order dated 18.3.2009 passed by the learned single Judge, dismissing CWP No.10740 of 2007 filed by the appellants. It is apparent from the records that in that writ petition, the petitioners laid challenge to the order passed by the Canal authorities, ordering restoration of the watercourse, which allegedly was demolished by the appellants. The authorities below found it as a matter of fact that the watercourse was running at the sport and the same was demolished by the appellants. By taking note of that finding, the writ petition was dismissed. We feel that the order passed is perfectly justified. No case is made out for interference. Dismissed. (Jasbir Singh) Judge 07.07.2010 (Augustine George Masih) gk Judge