IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.9298 of 2010 PRAKASH CHAUDHARY @ OM PRAKASH CHAUDHARY @ JAI PRAKASH CHAUDHARY, son of Harvansh Chaudhary ...Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ...OP ----------- 3/ 17.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. D. Surendra, C.G.C, and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 328, 307, 379 and 411/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 8 and 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. It has been submitted that eleven persons were caught at the spot with the incriminating articles and three of whom disclosed the names of seven co-accused persons including the present petitioner. The petitioner’s house was searched and thereafter Ativan tablets were recovered from his house. The petitioner is accused in another case of similar nature. Under the circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it expeditiously in view of the seriousness of the nature of offence. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)