IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION CASE No.334 of 2011 Rubi Kumari Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- 3. 03.08.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the Magadh University. The order of the writ Court itself noticed the time lag of approximately eight years after which publication of result was sought and that it may pose its own problems in hunting out old records. The show cause filed on behalf of the University encloses a resolution dated 3.9.2008 that answer books are normally destroyed three years after publication of the result. The petitioner was a student of the session 2000-2003. It is not possible for the Court to proceed against the opposite parties in contempt jurisdiction. To that extent the application is dismissed. If there is any provision in the statute, regulations or the rules for dealing with such cases after destruction of the records, the petitioner if so advised may pursue her remedies thereunder. The contempt application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)