IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3979 of 2008 Mahboob Alam & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 4/ 30.4.2010 Heard Shri Naresh Dixit, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Md. Ansarul Haque, learned APP for the state. During hearing of the petition, a copy of the order dated 10.2.2009 was produced before me which indicates that the case is fixed for recording the evidence of witnesses. The allegation is that the accused persons, after entering into the conspiracy of each other, brought into existence a false document and thereby created a story of title in certain persons in respect of one particular property as per details given in the written report. Many grounds were raised before me including the one that the informant of the case was a stranger to the family of the petitioners or to late Altaf Sai, whom he claimed to be his matrimonial grand father but, I find that the court has already proceeded substantially in the case and it could not be useful to scuttle out the proceedings after such length of proceeding. However, the court below, i.e., Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Gopalganj who is seized with the trial of G.R. No. 751 of 2004 / Tr. No. 2161 of 2007, is directed to be not liberal in granting adjournment and ensure that the witnesses are examined and other evidence or evidences are taken so that the judgment is delivered by the court before the end of 2010. A fair opportunity 2 shall be afforded to the accused persons for adducing their evidence in the court below. This application is disposed of with the aforesaid observation/direction. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)