HIGILCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petttion (2271 No. 7058 of 2008 1 PETITIONBR RESPONDENTS Raiau, S/o Hathiram, Caste Satnami, Agcd about 67 years, R/o viUage Parsiya, Tehsil Mimgeli, D^tt. Bilaspur (C.G). Vs. Lalji, s/o Aditya Prasad, R/o viUage Parsiya, Tehsil Mungeli Distt. BilaspTir (C.G) - (died) Ttirough Legal Representatives (A) Devkumari, aged about 75 years, widow of Lalji (B) Laxmi Bai, aged atiout 40 years, W/o Arun Kuniar Dubey, Daughter of Lalji Both are R/o Mohhala Sarkanda, Bangalipara, TehsU/ Distt. BiIaspur(C.G). (Writ PeUUon under Articte^227ofthe Co»»sytutioao0adia]l Appearance : Shri H.S. AhluwaUa, counsel for the petitioner. Shri H.B.Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Smt. Meera Jaiswal, counsel for the respondents. ORDBR (07.10.2009) SUNIL KUMAR 8INHA. J Heard. Leamed counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the wyt petitiou with liberty to file a civil suit ia fhe coinpetent court of civil jiirisdiction. He also prays fhat fhe iatenm order granted by this Court on 27.01.2009 niay also be directed tp be contmued for cme month. This is not opposed by the couxisel for the respondeirts. Rao 1 Wrlt Petttion (227t No. 70S8 of 2008 Accordiugfy, W.P(227).No. 7058/2008 is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to the petitioner to file a civU suit before a conipetent court of cwU jurisdiction. It is also directed fhat the iaterun orde-r graated by tfais Court on 27.01.2009 shaU coutmue for a further period of one inonth fi»in today and after the lapse of said period, the intermi order shaU autoinaticaUy lose its efficacy. This petition, thus stands disposed of, with the aforcsaid liberty/directions. No order as to costs. . I j^ SunUKumarSmha F^ Judge i—-