IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.682 of 2008 PRAKASH RANJAN Versus THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA ----------- For the appellant: Mr. Veena Rani Prasad Mr. Vishal Saurabh For the respondent : Mr. Lalit Kishore, AAG -III Mr. Satyabir Bharti, JC to AAG - III --- P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice And Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal --- Dated, the 23rd September, 2008 We heard counsel for the appellant and Mr. Lalit Kishore, Additional Advocate General – III for respondent. 2. Mr. Lalit Kishore, AAG – III submits that the entire selection process for filling up ten vacancies to the post of Data Operators has been completed. He has further submitted that the candidates, who have been appointed, were not impleaded as party -respondents in the writ petition nor they have been impleaded as party - respondents in the appeal. 3. In the circumstances, even if we assume that there is some merit in the contention of the appellant, in the absence of selected candidates, no relief can be granted to the appellant. 4. Letters patent appeal does not deserve to be 2 admitted. It is dismissed in limine. R. M. Lodha, CJ. Kishore K. Mandal, J. Neyaz/