Writ Petition No. 408 (SS) of 2004 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Misc. Application No. 6006 of 2005 Heard Sri Tumul Nailwal, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri H. Belwal, leaned brief holder for the state of Uttaranchal. Learned counsel for the parties have submitted that is the controversy raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 25.09.2003 passed by this court in Writ Petition No. 236 (SS) of 2000 (Pooran Singh Vs. State of Uttaranchal) connected with the writ petition No. 1257 (SS) of 2001(Deewan Singh & others Vs. State of U.P. and others) connected with Writ Petition No. 2039 (SS) of 2001 (Kunwar Singh & others Vs. State of U.P. and others), consequently, the present writ petition may be disposed of in the same terms of the aforesaid judgment. In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is finally disposed of in the same terms and conditions of judgment and order dated 25.09.2003 passed by this court in Writ Petition No. 236 (SS) of 2000(Pooran Singh Vs. State of Uttaranchal) connected with Writ Petition No. 1257 (SS) of 2001 (Deewan Singh & others Vs. State of U.P. and others) connected with Writ Petition No. 2039 (SS) of 2001 (Kunwar Singh & other Vs. State of U.P. and others). Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- 23.08.2005 S.K.S