IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14032 of 2005 RAMASHISH BHAGAT Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 23.7.2008 Heard learned counsel for the parties. After much struggle the petitioner managed to get himself engaged on daily wages as a casual conductor. He was earlier removed for the similar kind of acts of omission and commission. But since the Industrial dispute held in his favour he managed to find his engagement back. Petitioner has put himself in predicament all over again which is evident from perusal of annexure-5. By virtue of this order dated 15.12.2003 since the petitioner was a daily wager therefore the respondent Road Transport Corporation simply decided to disengage him. The Court does not find any infirmity in the said decision. If there is no legal right to petitioner in the matter and the Industrial dispute Act is remedy, the petitioner may avail his right before the industrial dispute and not before this Court. This writ application is accordingly dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)