IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No.34344 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 21, 2011 Lakhwinder Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.B.P.S.Virk, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. On 16.11.2011, this Court observed as under:- “Whether the application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. would be maintainable in those cases where the evidence is closed by an order, would be an issue in this case. The counsel submits that he has also challenged the order, whereby his evidence was closed by the trial Court. Whether revision would be maintainable to challenge such an order has also to be seen. Counsel prays for time to make submissions.” Counsel today seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file two appropriate petitions to challenge the order closing the evidence and the order whereby his prayer for summoning additional witnesses has been declined. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. November 21, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE