IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11941 of 2011 Ajay Raut Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3. 29.06.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 498(A), 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The marriage was performed in 2008. The accusation is of demand of dowry and torture. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the statement of own uncle of the deceased has been recorded in paragraph no. 21 of the case diary where he admitted that the victim took food in sharadh ceremony of some one and after that she was suffering from diarrhea and while she was being taken to hospital she died. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that except the informant no independent witnesses have supported the prosecution case and all have 2 stated that victim died due to diarrhea. It is further submitted that accusation of demand of dowry has also not been supported by any independent witness. The aforesaid contention of the petitioner has not been controverted by the learned counsel for the State. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Giriak P.S. Case No. 139 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Nalanda at Biharsharif, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)