1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.860 OF 2003 IN IN IN SUIT NO.2212 OF SUIT NO.2212 OF SUIT NO.2212 OF 2002 Manoj Vashu Mulchandani .. Plaintiff versus Suryakant H.Mehta & anr .. Defendants ... Mr. K.D.Shukla for Plaintiff. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 10th March 2005. DATED : 10th March 2005. DATED : 10th March 2005. P.C:- P.C:- P.C:- 1. Heard learned counsel for the plaintiff. None present for the defendants. In view of the fact that ad interim relief in terms of prayer clause (a) has already been granted, I see no reason to vacate the said relief in the absence of any affidavit in reply of the defendants. 2. As regards prayer clause (b) no grounds are made 2 out for appointment of a Court Receiver. Hence, relief in terms of prayer clause (b) cannot be granted. Hence, I pass following order : " Motion is made absolute in terms ofprayer clause (a). Motion is disposed of." D.G.KARNIK, J