Civil Revision No. 6617 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6617 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 1.11.2011 *** Bishan Dass .. Petitioner VS. Aruna Arora & Ors. .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR, Present:- Mr. Anil Chawla, Advocate for the petitioner. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. The petitioner-tenant is aggrieved with order dated 4.1.2011 by virtue of which his application seeking permission to amend the written statement has been dismissed. Heard. It is apparent from the perusal of paper book that the impugned application was filed by the petitioner when the landlord concluded his evidence and he too produced one witness in his evidence. Even it was not shown by the petitioner that despite exercise of due diligence the fact sought to be incorporated in the written statement could not be mentioned in the written statement. Therefore, finding the same as a device to fill up the lacuna and to delay the proceedings, the learned trial Court rightly dismissed the application. The instant petition, being without any merit, is accordingly dismissed in limine. (ARVIND KUMAR) November 01,2011 JUDGE Jiten