WRIT PETITION No. 1724 of2001 \^ ^ 2. 1. B.Ghoshal. aged 63 S/o. Late A. Ghosal R'o. 531, Sindliiya Nagar, P.0. & Dist. Qarg. Chhattisearh. 2. A.K.Kanjilal, aged 65, S/o. Late Fatiechand Kanjilal R/0. No. 522, Sindiya Nagar, P.0. & Dist. Ourg Cliihsttisg&rli. 3. S.K.Goswamy, aged 67 S/o Late B.K.Goswamy, aged 67 P.0. & Dist. Dwg Cl-Aattisgarh. 4. P.K.Dev. ased 64 C/o late P.Dev R/o 11/12, Sindhiya Nagar, P.0. & Dist. Diirg CMiattisgarh. 5. S.f.Aijsaia., aged 66 S/o Late P.N.Anaria R'o 528, Smdhiya Nagai- P.0. & Dist. Dur^ Chhattisgarh. 6. Jairaj Bhatia, aged 30 S/b Late M.K.Bfaatia, R,'o 532. Siadhiya Nagar. P.0. & Dist. Diu-g Chhattisgarh. 7. Dilip Kumar Biswas. aeed 45 S/o Late N.N.Biswas R/'O 526, Smdliiya Nagar P.0. & Distt. Durs Chhattisearh. 8. Nimial Ki-islma Goswaiiii, aged 64 S/o Late B.K.Goswamy R/o 415, Smdhiya Nagar, P.0. & Dist. Durg ClAattisgarh. 1. Director Under Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh AcUihiiyain,.1973, Raipur, ClihattisgaTh. Denutv Director Nagar Tatha Gi-am Nivesh Dist. Office, P.0. & A.T. Durg, Chliattisgarh. 3. District Maeistrate/Collector, Dist. Dun {^'iiiiiiiilki^dlll) 4. Commissioner Durg Mumcipal Corporation P.0. Dist. Dui-g(Chliattisgat-h) 5. Secretai'y Revenue Dqiartment Chhattisgarh State, Raipur CSiliattisgarh 6. Deputy Secretarv Office of the Govemor of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 7. Reeional Manager Pollution Control Board Bhilai, ClAattisgarh. WMT PEITHON UNDER AR'ncyj226_OF THE CONSTmjTlQN OF INDIA Coram : Hon'ble Shri JagtUsh Bhalla, Acting Ctriet'Justice & Hon'Me Shri Safeh K. Agmhotri J. Present: Sfari P.K.Moitra, Advocate for the petitioners. SSiri N.K.Agrawal, Deputy Advoeate Geaeral for tlie respondent No. 1.2,3.5and6/State. SSiri Suifliir Kumar Bajpai, Advocate for the respondeat No. 7. \¥\ (Passed on 16uldayofAugiist, 2007) Leamed counsel appearine for the petitioners submits tfaat tiie petitioners have approached this Court that the land which has been acquired for park, which was eariier beine used for burial and cremation, is still being used fbr burial and cremation aad he oravs that a direction be issued to the authorities concemed to use fhe land in question onlv as fbr park and not as burial or cremation center. According to the aftidavit filed by the opposite party No. 4, it is being said that the land in question is still beina used as burial/creniation center. However, the leamed Deputy Advocate General on behalf of the respondents No. 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 has catfcgoricallv submitted fhat the land in question now is being used oiilv for the purpose ofpark and it is not beins used fbr burial and cremation. We fmd that the petitioners have not filed auy rejoinder/atlidavit to the response of the afbresaid counter atfidavits. Non-controverting the contents of the eounter aifidavit amounts to admission. We are of the considered opinion that this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution Qf India cannot decide the disputed question offacts. Ifthe petitionere have some disputed question offacts, it would be open to the petitioners to approach the Nazul OfBcer or any ofher appropriate authoritv. In lieht ofthe above, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- Sd/- Satish K. Agmhotri Judge