IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12623 of 2008 UGRANATH MISHRA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.05.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the State and the learned Counsel for the informant. The petitioner is the husband apprehending arrest in a Police case under Sections 304B, 201, 120B read with Section 34 of the Penal Code. As per the allegations the deceased died in other than natural circumstances in approximately two years of the marriage ion the background of demands for dowry. The submission is that the deceased died a natural death because of illness in support of which certain prescriptions and materials have been brought on record in a supplementary affidavit as also the death certificate. Submission is that the deceased was residing in Maharastra with her husband where she was under treatment. This Court quarried the Counsel for the informant as to why the FIR was so secret about the residence of his son- in-law and the place where he was employed in his vocation which is otherwise referred to in vague terms in the FIR. The submission was that the Counsel requires time to seek instruction. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail during the period of investigation till submission of chargesheet on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM Darbhanga in Bahadurpur PS Case No. 72 of 2005, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)