(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.254 OF 2005 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.254 OF 2005 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.254 OF 2005 Deccan Explosives Manufacturing Company ...Appellant Versus Shri. Maruti Rambhau Gaikwad ...Respondent ..... Shri. Atul G. Damle, counsel for the Appellant ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED: 5TH DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 5TH DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 5TH DECEMBER, 2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- . Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant. None appears for the Respondent. By this Appeal, the Appellant has challenged the order dated 29.9.2005 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.3068 of 2005 exercising the power of superintendence under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. In view thereof, the L.P.A. itself is not maintainable. Even on merits, we do not find any error or illegality so as to interfere with the order of the learned Single Judge exercising the powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Appeal stands dismissed. *****