1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.2317 OF 1984 Ramkishandas Sagarmal Enterprises .. Plaintiffs Versus Ramgopal Textiles Pvt.Ltd. .. Defendants Mr.Rarooq Ahmed i/b. Y.H.Muchhala for plaintiff None for defendants. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 12th January 2009. P.C. . In the suit which is pending for the last more than 24 years in this Court, despite all attempts, it was not possible for the Registry to trace the plaintiff. 2. I had recorded in my order passed on 11th December 2008 that the Advocate who is shown as appearing for plaintiff is designated as Senior Advocate and, therefore, the papers have been 2 collected from him by the plaintiff. In the light of this statement made, it is not necessary to pursue the course suggested earlier. 3. None appears for the plaintiff when the matter is called out today. Therefore, there is no alternative but to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution. The same is accordingly dismissed. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)