IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 1513 of 2008 Between: B.Sakru S/o.B.Thavrya, Dr.B.R.A.C Social Welfare Junior College,Harthnura Medak Dist ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Chairman A.P.S.W.R.E.I Society(A.P.S.W.R.E.I.Society) Damodaram Sanjeevaiah Sankshema Bhavan Complex, Masab Tank,Hyd 2 The Vice Chairman A.P.S.W.R.E.I Society(A.P.S.W.R.E.I.Society) Damodaram Sanjeevaiah Sankshema Bhavan Complex, Masab Tank,Hyd 3 The Secretary A.P.S.W.R.E.I Society(A.P.S.W.R.E.I.Society) Damodaram Sanjeevaiah Sankshema Bhavan Complex, Masab Tank,Hyd ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of 'Mandamus' declare the action of the 3rd respondent in not filling the back log post of principal of Residential Schools in terms of guidelines issued in G.O.Ms.No.2 Social Welfare(SWRORI) Department dt.09-01-2004 as per the rule of reservation as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and consequently direct the respondents to appointment the petitioner as principal against the back log vacancy of ST(Women) by following the respondents to appoint the petitioner as principal against the back log vacancy of ST(women) by following the guideline-12(b) issued in G.O.Ms.No.2 social Welfare(SWRORI) Department dt.09-01-2004 pursuant to the Notification issued in Rc.No.R1/2430/2006 dt.01-08-2007 issued by the 3rd respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.RATNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.K.K.DURGA PRASAD The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondents to appoint him as principal against the back log vacancy of ST (Women) by following the guideline-12(b) issued in G.O.Ms.No.2 Social Welfare(SWRORI) Department dt.09-01- 2004 pursuant to the Notification issued in Rc.No.R1/2430/2006 dt.01- 08-2007 issued by the 3rd respondent. Today, when the writ petition is taken up for hearing, Sri K.Durga Prasad, learned standing counsel for the respondent society submitted that, after filing this writ petition, the petitioner was appointed as Principal and, therefore, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition.’ In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. N.V.RAMANA,J Dt.21.11.2008 msv