-#- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.970 OF 2006 Vijay Sadashiv Kamble.....Petitioner Vs. J.L.Shirekar Shikshan Sanstha &Ors.Respondents Ms. B.D’Souza i/b. M.P. Vashi & Associates for the Petitioner Mr. S.G.Deshmukh, for Respondent No.1. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 20th April,2006 DATE : 20th April,2006 DATE : 20th April,2006 P.C.: . The grievance of the petitioner is that though the petitioner has been reinstated his salary has not been paid. The petitioner apart from seeking the wages also seeks interest. This is purely a suit for recovery of money and ordinarily such claims are not entertained by way of a writ petition. 2. However, since the School is an aided school and the teacher is a regular employee and as on behalf of the management it has been pointed out that the bill for the salary has been forwarded to the Department the respondent on a copy of this order being furnished to him to take decision in the matter within a period of four weeks from today. The petitioner if entitled to salary it would be without any interest. With the above direction writ petition stands disposed of. (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J)