WP(C) 4470/2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. J. Payeng, the learned counsel for the petitio ner as well as Mr. LP Sharma, the learned Standing Counsel, Gauhati University a ppearing for the respondents. As agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for disposal at the motion stage itself. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ peti tion is that though he approached the University Authority with an application s eeking re-evaluation of the 2 (two) answer scripts relating to the subjects Cont ract-II and Constitutional Law, such application has not been accepted on the gr ound that he has appeared in those papers not in the regular batch but to clear the back papers. Mr. LP Sharma, the learned Standing Counsel, Gauhati Uni versity, on instruction has submitted that if the petitioner approaches the Univ ersity Authority, they will definitely accept the application and take necessary action on such application in terms of the rules and regulations of the Univers ity. In view of the aforesaid position, the present writ peti tion is disposed of with a direction to the University Authority, more particula rly the respondent No.2, to accept the application, if filed by the petitioner w ithin 1 (one) week from today, seeking re-evaluation of the answer scripts of th e aforesaid 2 (two) papers and to take necessary action on such application. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No cost.