THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.M.A.No.81 of 2007 JUDGMENT: The appellant filed O.S.No.146 of 2006 in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Sangareddy against the respondents for the relief of perpetual injunction in respect of the suit schedule property. He has also filed I.A.No.606 of 2006 under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. Initially, the trial Court granted ad-interim injunction, as prayed. After the respondents filed counter-affidavit, it dismissed the I.A., through order, dated 29.05.2006. Hence, this appeal. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondents. Voluminous material was placed before the trial Court by both the parties in the form of Exs.A1 to A12 and Exs.B1 to B23. The trial Court, no doubt, recorded a finding to the effect that the appellant is not in possession of the suit schedule property. The fact, however remains that this Court granted an order of status quo way back on 06.02.2007. For the past more than two and half years, that order is in force. It is felt that the same arrangement may remain in force and the suit itself be directed to be disposed of, as early as possible. Hence, the appeal is allowed and the order under appeal is set aide. I.A.No.606 of 2006 is ordered, directing that status quo obtaining as on 06.02.2007 shall be maintained till the disposal of the suit. The trial Court shall endeavour to dispose of the suit, within a period of four (4) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:08.10.2009 kdl