^'rD q)/o n»^p ~y Hemant Patanwar, S/o Shri Komal Prasad Patanwar, Aged about 31 years, R/o Sarkanda, Sangati Para, Gali No.3, Bi!aspur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Throuoh: The Secretary, Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Collector; Bllaspur (C.G.) The Tahsildar, Bilaspur (C.G.) The Revenueinspector, Bilaspur. Vinod Tamboli, S/o Late Shri Samela, aged about 49 years, Patwari, Patwari Halka No.27, Tifra, Tahsil and Distt. Biiaspur >sent : Shri PS Koshy, counss Shri Praveen Das, the State/respondents ie appeltant. Government Advocate for .1 to4. (29th Aprif, 2008) The foilowlng Judgment of the ^ s^ ^ Learned counsel for the parties are heard on admission. 2) Appellant - Hemant Patanwar who was respondent No.5 in the writ petition has fiied this writ appeat against the order dated 13.03.2008 inWP (S) No. 1598/2008. 3) WP (S) No. 1598/2008 was disposed of vide ordsr dated 13.03.2008which reads as follows ; consent of learned counsel appearing for both the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finaliy. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the respondents / State submits that the order dated 20.12.2007, if there is no other modified order, shall be giyen effect to in its letter and spirit. 3) in view of the categorica! statsment made by iearned counsel in al! fairness, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing survives in this petition. 4) Needful shali be done as early as possible, preferably within a period of two weeks. 5) Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. ConsequenUy, IA No.1 stands disposed of." 4) Since the above quoted order passed in the Writ Petjtion has not decided the rights of the parties in any manner, we do not find any ground for interference in the writ appea!. 5) The writ appeaf, therefore, fails and is hereby dismissed summarily. Sdl- Chiei iustice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge padma