IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.400 of 2010 National Insurance Co. Ltd., Divisional Office, Gaya. ... ... Appellant. Versus 1. Debanti Devi, wife of late Pawan Kumar, resident of Patela Pokhar, P.O. Kora, P.S. Ghoshi, District Jehanabad. 2. Lal Mohan Prasad, Son of Sri Adalat Prasad Lal, resident of house no.158, Village Ghorabasa, Lal Building, District Singhbhum (Jharkhand). ... ... Respondents. ---------------------------------- 5. 20.9.2011. Heard Shri Prakash Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant on Interlocutory Application i.e. I.A. No.6491 of 2011, which has been filed with a prayer for enlargement of time for filing certified copy of the impugned order. The present appeal was preferred against the order dated 7.1.2010 passed by the Deputy Labour Commissioner-cum-Commissioner under the Workmen’s Compensation Act in C.W.C. No.23 of 2006. By the said order, the learned court below had directed the appellant to pay compensation amount to the applicant-claimant i.e. respondent no.1, whose husband died in a motor vehicle accident. It was claimed that the husband of the respondent no.1 was employed on the offending Dumper bearing Registration No.JH-05J-9019. The appeal was filed on 12.5.2010 without certified copy of the impugned order. The Stamp Reporter pointed out the defect and thereafter on 2 23.8.2010, on the prayer made by learned counsel for the appellant, four weeks’ time was granted by the Lawazima Board for filing certified copy of the impugned order. Since order was not complied with by order dated 6.1.2011, the Lawazima Board placed the matter before the Bench. On 12.9.2011, one week time was granted by this Court for filing impugned order, failing which it was directed that appeal shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. Even till date, certified copy of the impugned order has not been filed and a petition has been filed i.e. I.A. No.6491 of 2011 for enlargement of the time for filing certified copy. The court is of the opinion that in the matter relating to compensation due to death in an accident, such indulgence may not be granted. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)