^C/~6 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER Writ Petition (S) l^KS /2010 <•" (S.B) ;s^^l rfgNlsLE SsMistt ..^'^s'^ l.*« »* ca."'?..-—'^_.y.:..VA^"""/"~ fts^!!!S4fl^^ Smt Vinita Naidu, W/o Shri R.K.Naidu, Aged about 55 years, Resident of A-53 wallfort Enclave Pachpedi Naka, Tahsil andDistrict-Raipur(C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. / State of Chhattisgarh.Through Secretary, School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralay, Raipur (C.G.) 2. ^ Director Public Instructions, Pension Bada, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3.-^' DistrictEducation Officer, Pension Bada, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION QF INDIA, FOR THE ISSUANCE OF DIRECTION (S) OR ORDER (S). ^'iaK&^5SiS'eE?;:"s'^"?3Sk wf'SSi'S1', HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRTT PETmON CS) No. 488 of2010 PETITIONER : Smt. Vinita Naidu. V-ERSUS RESPONDENTS : StateofChhattisgarh&Others. WRIT PETn'ION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTn'UTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Aenihotri. J. Present: Shri Prakash Tiwari, Advocate with Smt. V. Shradha Rao, Advocats for fhe petitioner. Sfari N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORAL OKDER (Passed on 02'"1 day of February, 2010) 1. Shri Tiwari, leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has approaehed this Court eariier in W.P.(S) No. 6774/2009, challenging the order dated 24.09.2009 (Annexure P/2). The said petition was disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation and in tum, the respondent authorities were direeted to do the needfiil at the eariiest. Shri Tiwari further submits that the order dated 3.12.2009 (Annexure P/l) has been passed without considering the faetual mistake in the order as pointed out by the petitioner in her representation dated 7.12.2009 (Aanexure P/5) and prays that the respondent authorities may be directed to consider and decide the said representation in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. 2. Having regard to the &cts situation ofthe case wherein it appears that the respondent authorities have passed the impugned order on 3.12.2009 (Annexure P/l) prior to filing of the representation by the petitioner, it is directed that the concemed authority shall look into the prayer of the petitioner and factual error pointed out by the petitioner in her representation dated 7.12.2009 (Annexiu-e P/5) and thereafter, pass appropriate orders in aecordance with law within a period of two weeks jrom the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. 3. With the aferesaid observation and directiott, the writ petition is disposed o£ —:-— Amit Sd/- SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI Judge