THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.19424 of 2008 ORDER: There existed vast extent of Government land in Survey No.127 of Yousufguda, Hyderabad. Out of it, Acs.50.00 of land was allotted to an Employees Co-operative Society i.e. respondent No.3 herein, vide G.O.Ms.No.1194, dated 18.12.1974. The land was entrusted for development to the erstwhile Hyderabad Development Authority, respondent No.1 herein. The petitioner states that an extent of 103.11 square yards of land within that survey number was held by her father and in recognition of his title, respondent No.3 executed a title deed, known as confirmation of house site allotment, on 13.11.1982. Her grievance is that the respondents are trying to evict her. Heard Sri Syed Shareef Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri M.Dhananjay Reddy, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and Sri O.Manohar Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.3. The petitioner claims right over a plot of 103.11 square yards, on the strength of a document, dated 13.11.1982. Though it is mentioned that the said plot was alienated in favour of the father of the petitioner, it is not registered and it is written on a stamp paper of Rs.5/-. The question as to whether the petitioner can claim right or title over the property on the strength of a document written on a stamp paper of Rs.5/-, needs to be examined, in case she approaches a civil Court for necessary relief. This Court cannot adjudicate such disputed questions of fact. Respondent No.3 has referred to a claim said to have been made by one Smt.Fathimunnisa Begum on similar lines and the various proceedings that have ensued so far. Inasmuch as this Court is not inclined to determine the rights of the petitioner, it is not necessary to delve into the merits of the matter. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. It is, however, directed that status quo obtaining as on today shall be maintained for a period of two (2) weeks from today enabling the petitioner to approach a civil Court for necessary relief. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:17.12.2009 kdl