IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN FRIDAY, THE 13TH MARCH 2009 / 22ND PHALGUNA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 200 of 2009(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.31336/2008 Dated 04/11/2008 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN WPC. ---------------------- O.JOHNY, S/O. OUSEPH, AGED 33 YEARS, PEON, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF OFFICE OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES(AUDIT), KARTHIKAPPALLY, HARIPPAD.P.O,RESIDING AT KURUVELIL HOUSE, KOKKOTHAMANGALAM.P.O, CHERTHALA-688583. BY ADVS. MR.T.P.DEYANANTHAN MR.A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PANICKER MR.SEEMA.R RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT NO.2 IN WPC. ----------------------- PUNEET KUMAR, (AGED AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER ) DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.A.J.VARGHES THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ---------------------------------------------- Cont. Court Case No.200 of 2009-S --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of March, 2009. J U D G M E N T Shri.A.J.Varghese, the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that orders were issued on 27.2.2009 granting inter departmental transfer to the petitioner. He also states that in the said order the address of the petitioner was incorrectly shown and that later by order passed on 3.3.2009 the Director of Technical Education has corrected the mistake in the proceedings issued by him on 27.2.2009. Copies of the orders were also made available to me for perusal. I am therefore satisfied that the direction issued by this Court in Annexure A1 judgment has been complied with. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner however submits that copies of the orders issued by the Director of Technical Education have not so far been served on the petitioner. 2. The request made by the petitioner was granted by the Director of Technical Education by order passed on 27.2.2009. Since the address of the petitioner was incorrectly mentioned therein, a copy of the order was sent in the incorrect address. Later, on realizing the mistake, the address was corrected as per order passed on 3.3.2009. The learned Government Pleader submits that copies of the Cont. Court Case No.200 of 2009-S 2 orders passed by the Director of Technical Education on 27.2.2009 and 3.3.2009 will be communicated to the petitioner at the earliest. In these circumstances I close this Contempt of Court Case with a direction to the Director of Technical Education to communicate to the petitioner, copies of the orders passed by him on 27.2.2009 and 3.3.2009 by registered post acknowledgment due. Sd/- P.N.RAVINDRAN JUDGE //True Copy// PA to Judge ab