THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3692 OF 2009 DATED: 22.03.2011 Between: Maddipati Varalakshmi. .... PETITIONER And Maddipati Budhudu. .... RESPONDENT ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order, dated 01.05.2009, in I.A.No.754 of 2003 in O.P.No.114 of 2002 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Tanuku, West Godavari District, wherein the said application filed by the petitioner herein under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, was dismissed. 2. Heard both sides. Perused the record. 3. Petitioner herein is the wife of the respondent. Respondent filed O.P.No.114 of 2002 for dissolution of marriage and the petitioner filed O.P.No.29 of 2003 for restitution of conjugal rights. It is stated that both the petitions were clubbed together and joint enquiry was conducted. When the matter has reached the stage of arguments, petitioner filed I.A.No.754 of 2003 seeking interim maintenance of Rs.1000/- to herself and Rs.2000/- per month to each of her children. Though the said application is filed in the year, 2003, the same came to be disposed of only in 2009. Meanwhile, enquiry in the main O.P. itself commenced and recording of evidence was also completed. Petitioner filed I.A.No.605 of 2008 for stay of further proceedings pending disposal of I.A.No.754 of 2003 and admittedly, no such stay was granted and on the other hand the enquiry went on. As the matter has reached the stage of arguments, it is only just and proper that the trial Court is directed to dispose of the main O.P.No.114 of 2002 along with the connected O.P.No.29 of 2003 at an early date, instead of going into the merits of the case. The trial Court is directed to dispose of O.P.No.114 of 2002 on its own merits within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is open to the petitioner to avail the other remedies permissible under law in respect of her claim for maintenance and the disposal of this petition does not come in the way of her seeking the other remedies. 4. Accordingly, Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 22nd March, 2011. Tsy