IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21329 of 2009 AMRENDRA YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 30.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Informant’s grand son is kidnapped in the incident. Sikandar Yadav has been alleged for kidnapping, actually he has been convicted also. The kidnapped boy is traceless. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, there is no involvement of the petitioner in kidnapping, only Sikandar Yadav stayed in the house of the petitioner earlier to kidnapping and his wife, sister of Sikandar Yadav has been allowed bail by a Bench of this Court. Once it is established or evidence comes that kidnapping was facilitated to remain to the petitioner that is further followed by his absconding, clearly indicates that he is not entitled for anticipatory bail merely on the ground that his wife is allowed bail earlier as law favours her to certain extent. Thus I find it not a fit case for anticipatory bail. Accordingly prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI