WP(C) 4483/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE. BD AGARWAL With the consent of the learned counsel for both the sides, this writ petition s tands disposed of at the admission stage itself. Heard Mr. AKTalukdar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. M. Bhagawati, learned CGC and Ms. B. Hazarika, learned Govt. counsel for the State respondents. The writ petitioner is challenging the judgment and order dated 9.11.2010 passed by the learned Member, Foreigners Tribunal, Sonitpur, Tezpur i n Foreigners Tribunal (D) Case No. 72/08. By the impugned judgment, the petition er has been declared an illegal migrant. Mr. Talukdar submitted that the petitioner had submitted his wri tten statement in the Tribunal but the learned counsel neither filed the docum ents the tribunal nor intimated the petitioner about the proceedings. Hence, th e judgment has been passed ex-parte. Upon hearing learned counsel for both the sides, I am of the vie w that the interest of justice would be met if one more opportunity is given to petitioner to give evidence in her defence in the Tribunal. For the aforesaid pu rpose, the impugned judgment is hereby set aside. It is made clear that the peti tioner shall remain in detention/judicial custody till a fresh judgment is passe d. The concerned authority is directed to produce the petitioner in the Tribunal o n 24.10.2011. Thereafter, the Tribunal shall decide the case within a period of three months. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands closed.