1 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.114 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.54 OF 2009 Shri Ramraj Ramrup Awasthi .....Applicant. Vs. M/s Kumar Electricals & Anr. . ... Respondents. ..... Mr. Ganesh Bhujbal i/b Prakash Naik, for the Applicant. Mr. Hrishikesh Mundargi, for Respondent No.1. Mr. D.P. Adsule, APP for the State. ..... CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATE : 28 th APRIL, 2010. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant and learned Advocate appearing on behalf of Respondent No.1. Perused the Application and the Order passed by this Court. 2. The Criminal Revision Application has been dismissed for non compliance with the Order dated 13.1.2010. However, in the memo of this Application it has been stated that the Order has been complied with belatedly on 22.3.2010. The Order was to be complied with on 10.3.2010. It is prayed that consequences of non compliance will be dismissal of the Criminal Revision Application challenging an Order of conviction and sentence for offences punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable 2 Instruments Act. In such circumstances, the Criminal Application is allowed. The delay is condoned provided Applicant pays cost quantified at Rs.5000/- to be paid to Respondent No.1 within a period of week from today. 3. In the light of the fact that the amount is now deposited, the first Respondent is at liberty to withdraw the sum so deposited with accrued interest on production of authenticated copy of this Order. (S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)