@9 /§)a CD §ia§§§E$ Ewmh IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P. (S) No. ' W 0 7/ of2009 / PETITIONER : Kunwar Lal Sinha, aged about 51 years, S/o Hatoi Qawv)“(\ \x W) government am Sinha, Assmtant PrHnary Teacher Schooi Q l 6 \ K \ Paragaonkala, Dongargarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ¢ VERSUS /, :1. State of Chhattisgarh v Through : Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) /’ 2. District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) /V 3. Block Education Officer, Dongargarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/ 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA $ @ By this petiiiori! the petitiorier seeks to chaiienge the iegaiitv and validity of the order daied 3010612009 (Annexafe PM) by which the petitionef has been transferred fmm Paragaon Kaia fo Dongargarh.‘ Learneei coense! appearing fer the State submits that the petitioner hae aiready coniériued at the originai place of posting for more than 1 yea! and 8 months on account of interim order dated U6108/2003‘ granted by this Court. The State/respondents may be granted iiberty to paes eopropriaie orders keeping in View public interest and adminisirative exigency. Leamed counsei further submits that the State/respondents shatt not insist upon compiiance of the impugned order oiated 30/06/2009 (Annexure P11). it is accoroingiy ordereo‘. Since no effect oouiot be given to the impugned order dated 30i66l200§ (Annexure P/i) on account of the interim order dated OGiOBl‘ZOOg it is not necessarv to go mto the iegairtv and va Idity of the rmougned order dated 30/06/20Q9 {Armexure P11) In the facts of the case in View of the above. according to learned counsel appearing for the pettttoner, nothing survives in this petttion for adtuo‘ication at this stage. Accordingty} the writ petition stands disposed of, No order asto costs. C:a i/_ _- Sd/- \ ./ Arun Satlsh K Agnlhotrl Judge ‘ HEGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILA$PUR WRIT PETETHON (S) NéAmZ OF 2099 PETETIGNER Kunwar Laé Sinha Versus RESPONDEN‘FS $tate of Chhattésgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Articie 22632? of the Constitution of india) $ingie Eem g : Hon’bie Shii Satiah K. Agmhotril J. Present :— 3hri KS. Pawar, Advocate for the peiiiioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Govemment Advocate for the $€atelrespandema ORDER (QRAL) (Passed an this 19‘“ day of Api'ii, 201 1) 1. Heard ieamed counsei for the parties.