: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6509 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.6509 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.6509 OF 2008 Shri Suresh Kadam and Others ...Petitioners. V/s. Pimpri-Chinchwad Municipal Corporation, Pune and another ...Respondents. Mr.S.B.Deshmukh , adv. for the Petitioners. Mr.D.R.More & Rakesh Patil , advs. for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM: Bilal Nazki CORAM: Bilal Nazki CORAM: Bilal Nazki & J.H.Bhatia,JJ J.H.Bhatia,JJ J.H.Bhatia,JJ. DATE : 1st October, 2008. DATE : 1st October, 2008. DATE : 1st October, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Petitioners’ grievance was that the respondent nos.1 and 2 were taking steps to demolish the structure of the petitioners, although an application for regularisation was pending before the respondent no.1. Therefore, he prays that till his representation for regularisation is decided, respondents should be directed not to demolish the structure. The learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 and 2 on instructions submits that representation of the petitioners has already been rejected, therefore, they may proceed in accordance with the law. Since the application for regularisation has been rejected and we understand this order is appellable order, therefore, we dispose off this writ petition directing no coercive steps to be taken by : 2 : the respondent nos.1 and 2 for demolition for a period of two weeks from the date the order of rejection of regularisation is delivered to him in order to enable him to file appeal. 2. With these observations, petition is disposed off. (Bilal Nazki, J.) (Bilal Nazki, J.) (Bilal Nazki, J.) (J.H.Bhatia, J.) (J.H.Bhatia, J.) (J.H.Bhatia, J.)