3 and 4 % 01.09.2011 Present: Mr. P.K.Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner/appellant. Mr. Ravi Sikri and Mr. Vaibhav Kaira Advocates for the respondent no.l. Mr. Subhash Chand Suri and Mr. K.K.Gautam Advocates for respondent no.4 with S.I.Ral<esh Kumar, P.S.Bhajanpura. Ms. Sonia Sharma, Adv. for respondent no.5/GNCT. + Cont.Cas(C) No. 351/2011 & CM No.9789/2011 & + Review Petition No. 383/2011 and CM No. 13090-92/2011 in RFA No. 171/2011 Learned counsel who appears for the petitioner in the contempt petition does not press the contempt petition. Counsel for respondent no.l/landlord states that the possession of the property has already been received. A joint stand of counsel for the parties therefore is that the matter need not be proceeded further and both the contempt petition and the review petition along with pending applications can be disposed of as withdrawn. Since the contempt petition is being withdrawn, I also recall the order dated 20.7.2011 to the extent requiring the presence of Mr. Surinder Santoshi. The contempt petition and the review petition along with connected applications are dismissed as not pressed. SEPTEMBER 01, 2011 VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J. lb Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified