IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15759 of 2009 ***** Binod Ram son of Shri Sakaldeep Ram, resident of village- Alipur, Police Station Mahua, District- Vaishali. …. …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through its Chairman, State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Bihar, Patna. 2. The North Bihar Regional Transport Authority, Muzaffarpur through its Secretary. 3. The Chairman, North Bihar Regional Transport Authority, Muzaffarpur. 4. The Secretary, North Bihar Regional Transport Authority, Muzaffarpur. 5. The District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur. 6. The Additional Collector, Hajipur, District-Vaishali. 7. The Superintendent of Police, Vaishali at Hajipur. 8. The Sub Divisional Officer, Mahua, Vaishali. 9. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Mahua, Vaishali. 10. The Circle Officer, Mahua, Vaishali. 11. Shri Daya Nand Singh, son of Late Kapildeo Singh, resident of village- Mahua, Police Station Mahua, District-Vaishali. 12. Shri Bipin Kumar, son of Shri Raj Ballabh Singh, resident of village- Shahwajpur Puraina, Police Station Fatehpur, District-Vaishali. …. …. Respondents ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar Choudhary, Advocate Mr. Navendu Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ashok Kumar Dubey, Assistant Counsel to Additional Advocate General-IX ----------- 2. 18.11.2009. Heard counsel for the parties. Earlier the petitioner had approached this High Court by way of C.W.J.C. No. 15129 of 2009. The issue was Mahua bus stand and its location in the district of Vaishali. Challenge in the writ application was to the order dated 30th October, 2009, which was passed by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Bihar, Patna in Transport Revision No.34 of 2007. After having heard all the parties the Court disposed of the writ application on 10.11.2009. The Court observed that the matter will be looked into by the North Bihar Regional Transport Authority afresh after taking all the materials into consideration irrespective of the observations - 2 - of the Tribunal. This was to be done with due dispassion and objectivity. Petitioner is back again in the present writ application because on 11.11.2009 itself based on the decision of the State Transport Appellate Tribunal an order bas come to be passed. Submission of the counsel is that obviously the impugned order’s proximity to the order of the High Court contained in Annexure-11 shows that the same was not taken into consideration or have been acknowledged by them If the High Court had passed an order, made certain observations in its order dated 10.11.2009 then every authority subordinate to the High Court in the State of Bihar has a constitutional obligation to take note or it and act upon it. The impugned order contained in Annexure-12 dated 11.11.2009 is set aside on this score alone and the matter is remitted back to the North Bihar Regional Transport Authority for passing a fresh order. The writ application is allowed to the extent indicated above. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)