1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3125 OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra ..APPLICANT VERSUS Satish s/o Babasaheb Dhus ..RESPONDENT Mr K. J. Ghute Patil, A.P.P. for the applicant CORAM : P.V. HARDAS, J DATE : 26th July, 2010 ORAL ORDER : By this application the applicant - State questions the correctness of the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Beed, dated 11.6.2009, in Misc. Criminal Application No.358 of 2009 allowing the application and directing the release of the respondent on bail in the event of his arrest. 2. Shri K.J. Ghute Patil, learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the allegations were extremely grave and the police custody of the applicant was necessary in order to further the investigation. According to the learned A.P.P., the Trial Court was in error in granting anticipatory 2 bail to the respondent. None appears on behalf of the respondent though he has been duly served. 3. Mr K.J. Ghute Patil, learned A.P.P. has also admitted that the charge-sheet in the said crime has already been submitted. If that be the case, there is no question that the applicant now obtaining the police custody of the respondent. In any event, the Trial Court has appreciated the material against the respondent and thought it fit to grant anticipatory bail to the respondent. I do not notice any perversity in the reasoning of the Trial Court to warrant any interference at the behest of the applicant. Application is accordingly dismissed. ( P.V.HARDAS, J.) amj/criap3125.09