/^J' i^7. \/^> ^ BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) W.P. (S) No. ?0 44 of 2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS °A^ ^>:" ^^4^</ .<^y / y Ku. Radha Pambhoye D/o Bakaiya Raj Pambhoye, aged about 52 years, Assistant Teacher. M.L.B. Girls Higher Secondary School, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Schedule Tribe, Schedule Caste Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) ^2. The Commissioner, Schedule Tribe and Schedule Caste Development, Raipur (C.G.) ^ 3. The Assistant Commissioner Tribal Development, Jagdalpur, Distt.- Bastar (C.G.) 4. The Principal, M.L.B. Girl Higher Secondary School, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. '^ Present: HIGH^OURT OF e'HHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRTT PETmON fSV No. 1049 of 2010 PETTTIONER : Ku.Radha Pambhoye. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTIGLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble ShriSatish K. Agnihotri. J. Shri Subhash Yadav, Advocateforfhepetitioner. Shri A.V.Shridhar, Panel Lawyer fbr the State/respGndents. ORALORDER (Passed on 12fll day of March, 2010) 1. Leamed counsel appearmgfor the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits. However., the petitioner prays that the reprcsentation dated 6.1.2009 (Annexure P/6) made to fhe respondent No. 3, and &e communication dated 4.3.2009 (Aimexure P/7) made by the respondent No. 3 to the respondent No. 2,has not been decided and is pending consideration. 2. R is the obligation of tfie State authorities to consider and decide the representations made by the employees in respect of their service conditions and the same may be decided ©xpeditiously to ensure improvemetit in the efficieney ofthe administration. Senior officers are not takmg care of the representations made by the employ^^ regard to their ser^ice conditions. In fhe present ease, the dispute is with regard to seniorify which has been addressed to the Assistant Commissioner and thfireafter fo the Assistant Commissioner has forwarded the said representation fbr further action tot he Commissionef, Tribal Welfare. The said representation remains unconsidered and undecided till date. 3. LeamedPanelLawyerappearmgfortheState/rcspon^ the representation, as afbrestated is still pending consideration, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law on its own merits and perspectivG, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks fi:om the date ofreceipt ofacopyofthis order. 4. In viewof the above, accordmg to leamed counsel appearmg for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication at thi^ stage. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of j~ Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge