HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WntPetitioiiCS)No. 4099 of2008 PETITIONER : Heeramani Sharma aged about 63 years, son ofShri Gaya Prasad Sharma, Resident of Primary School, South Jhagrakhand, District Korea (CG). VE^US RESPQNDENTS : 1. State ofChhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur(CG). 2. The District Education Officer, Korea, District Korea 3. Administrator/Headmaster, Primaiy School, South Jhagrakliand, District Korea (CG). 4. The Director, Directorate, Public Institution, Pension Bada, Raipur (CG). (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONS'H'mTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Aauhotri, J.) Present : Shri R.K. Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitioner, Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lav\yer for the State. ORALORDER (Passed on 29U1 day ofJuly, 2008) 1. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for heai'ing finally. 2. The petitioner claims to be an Assistant Teacher, working in I.E.M. School, Jhagrakhand, Distnct Korea (CG), run aiid managed by the respondent No. 3. The petitioiier without giving details as to what is the nature of the School, why the teachers are at par with other teachers, has filed this petition, praying that the respondents be directed to grant benefits of5 Pay Commission w.e.f. 01.01.1996. 3. Be that as it may, it is difficult to decide the issue involved for want of adequate materials with regard to grant of5 Pay Commission to the employees. 4. This Court has already considered and decided the same issue on ( | 06.02.2007 in the matter of A. Lall (Smt.) Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others1 (W.P; No. 4108 of2005) and other connected matters. 5. It is not necessaiy to approach this Court directly when the law on a particular issue has already been settled. The petitioner may make a representation to the concemed authorities, if so advised, in the light of law settled by this Court in the matter ofA. Lall (Smt.) Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others (Supra). 6. This petition is accordingly disposed of with the above stated libeity. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Sahu 2007 (1) BLJ 265