“WWW HIGH COUR‘T OF CHHATTISGARH: BiLii3?UR Writ PetitEon (S1 A30. 3434 of 20$; Petitioner BK. Pandey, Sio. Shri Jodhan Prasad Pandey, aged abaut 42 years, R/Q Vmage Mataka, Post Mataka, Thsii Bemetara, Digtrict Durg (CG). Versus Resgcndents 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary} Department of Schso! Educaticn: Mantraaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur. 2) The Director, Rajya Shaiks’nik Anusandhan Avam {CG}. Prashikshan Parishad) $hankar Nagar, Raépur 3) The Principax, Government Edtication Coiiege, Shankar Nagar, Raipklr (CG), 5) The Sub Divisiona£ Omcer, Bemetara, Distric: Durg (CG). 4) The Cene'ctar, Burg, District Burg (CG; 6) ’ Gourishankar Barker, Prmcipar m~charge, D§sfr€ct Institute of Education 8% Training, Bemefara, Distt. Durg (CG), (Writ Petition uhder Amc’e 226 of the Constitution of india) SB: Hon’bie Wir. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri AK Tiwari,, counsei for the petitioner‘ Present. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Advocate Generai foré 1e State. ORAL ORDER (Feesed on 7‘“ day of July. gQDB) o With consent of iearneo’ counsel appearing for both the parties, the matter is heard finaiiy. 3 - 1) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits ihat the petitioner does not want to press this petition on merits at this stage. However, the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation before the concerned authorities within a period or three days and the same may 'oe directed to be decided within the prescribed time. 2) ‘ Shri Y.S. Thakur, iearned counsei appearing for the State submite that if the representation is made, the same shaii be decided ’oy the concerned authority within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of representation. nothing survives in the matter. Mr. YS. Thakur, Deputy Advocate Generai, further submits that no coercive steps shall be taken, till the disposai u 3) in view of the foregoing, i ‘ i , J ofthe representation. Sd/- shtish K. Aghihotri Judge Raju 33;’, , h'J .,‘fv