IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 638 OF 2007 SHRI. ASHOK B. SHETYE ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND 3 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. V. A. Lawande, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Ms. R. Chodankar, Additional Government Advocate for the Respondents. Coram:- D. B. BHOSALE & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 21st January, 2008 P.C.:- Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner and learned Advocate General for the Respondents. Learned Advocate General at the out-set submits that the State Government is prepared to consider and decide a representation dated 1-12-2006 made by the Petitioner seeking regularization of his service and other consequential reliefs within time frame. In view of the statement made by the learned Advocate General, learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that this petition may be disposed of with direction to the Government to consider the representation dated 1-12-2006, which is annexed to the present writ petition as Annexure "AA" within the time frame and in that case he would not press the prayers in the writ petition at this stage. Having regard to the submissions of the learned Counsel for the parties, in our opinion, the following order shall meet the ends of justice. The State Government shall consider and decide the representation made by the Petitioner dated 1-12-2006(Exh."AA") as expeditiously as possible and preferably within twelve weeks from the date of receipt of this order on merits in accordance with law. All contentions in the writ petition are kept open. Writ Petition is disposed of. D. B. BHOSALE, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.