RSA No.3023 of 1987 1 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.3023 of 1987 Date of Decision: 31.3.2010 Jagmal Singh ...Appellant Versus Ratti Ram .....Respondent 1. Whether Reporter of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment- Yes/No. 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not- Yes/No. 3. Whether judgment should be reported in the digest-Yes/No. Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh Present: Mr. Sanjay Mittal, Advocate for the appellant. None the respondent. ..... Alok Singh, J. (Oral) 1. Plaintiff-appellant has filed this second appeal challenging the judgment and decree dated 10.8.1987 passed by learned First Appellate Court/District Judge, Narnaul. Plaintiff-appellant has filed suit for recovery of Rs.3380/- on the basis of pronote in question. 2. Learned First Appellate Court recorded finding of fact that pronote was not proved having been executed by respondent- defendant. No substantial question of law arises for consideration of this Court; case is covered by the finding of fact. Ordinarily, finding of fact cannot be disturbed by this Court while exercising jurisdiction under Section 100 CPC unless and until any substantial question of law arises in the appeal. RSA No.3023 of 1987 2 3. This appeal being devoid of merit, must fail and the same is dismissed with no order as to costs. (ALOK SINGH) JUDGE 31.3.2010 sharmila