-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 248 OF 2009 Baliram Laxman Kshetri ... Petitioner vs. The Education Officer (Secondary) Z.P. Solapur and Ors. ...Respondents Mr. S.G. Kudle for the petitioner. Mr. A.B. Vagyani, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 4. Mr. A.M. Joshi for respondent No.3 CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & R.G. KETKAR, JJ. DATE: APRIL 06, 2010. P.C. Since third respondent has already been promoted, we permit the petitioner to approach the School Tribunal and whatever contentions taken in the petition can be taken before the School Tribunal. The Tribunal shall also decide the question as to whether the promotion given to respondent No.3 was rightly given or not. All these questions are kept open for consideration of the Tribunal. Needless to say that Tribunal shall also consider the inter se seniority between the petitioner and respondent No. 3 as also the claim of the petitioner regarding his promotion. The petitioner may file appropriate appeal latest by 30th April, 2010. If such appeal is preferred within the said period, the Tribunal shall entertain the same, without considering the aspect about -2- limitation as the petitioner was prosecuting his remedy before this Court. 2. Subject to what is stated above, the petition is disposed of. It is for the Tribunal to consider the request of the present petitioner to decide the appeal expeditiously as it is pointed out that the petitioner is going to retire within a short period. We have no doubt in our mind that the Tribunal shall consider such request expeditiously. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. R.G. KETKAR, J.