1 wp-2308.08 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2308 OF 2008 Sou.Pratima @ Rani Hemant Nagrale. ... Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and others. ... Respondents. Mr.M.S.Mohite i/b Mr.A.Patankar for the petitioner. Mr.P.A.Pol, PP for the respondent-State. Mr.Amit Desai, Senior Advocate with Ravi Sharma, Amit Jajoo, Subodh Desai, S.S.Ghosh i/b. Subodh Desai for respondent No.8. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.P.BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : 7th December, 2010. P.C. : Learned Public Prosecutor has handed in final enquiry report regarding disproportionate assets held and possessed by respondent No.8 dated 7th December, 2010 issued under the signature of Director General of Anti Corruption Bureau, Maharashtra State, Mumbai. We 2 wp-2308.08 have perused the conclusion of the said report and returned it back to the learned Public Prosecutor. 2. In view of the said report, in our opinion, nothing survives for consideration in this petition. The allegations of the petitioner regarding disproportionate assets held and possessed by respondent No.8 have been considered at the highest level in the department by the Director General of Police. In view of the opinion reached by the said authority, the complaint of the petitioner cannot proceed further. Indeed whether the petitioner is entitled to get copy of the said report or can challenge the correctness thereof is a matter which can be considered in the appropriate proceeding. It is not necessary to burden this order with the said plea raised on behalf of the petitioner before us. 3. By way of indulgence, we agree with the submission of the counsel for the petitioner that at least he may be given inspection of the said report as the officer of the Court. The Public Prosecutor, on instruction, states that he would have no objection for providing inspection of the report to the counsel appearing for the petitioner. 3 wp-2308.08 4. In view of the above, nothing survives for consideration in this petition. The same is disposed of leaving all contentions available to the petitioner about her right to get copy of the said report under Right to Information Act or by other means from the department or to challenge the correctness of the said report in an appropriate proceeding. The same be decided on its own merits in accordance with law. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor agrees to give inspection to the advocates of the petitioner, namely, Mr.M.S.Mohite or Mr.A.Patankar in his office at 5.00 p.m. on 13th December, 2010. (A.P.BHANGALE, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)