cmuuonms IN TE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA RADESH T JAPR‘ .P. \ P A‘ ABLU M 0 &/ M/S RAIPUR COB/PLEX, a partnershlp firm duly registered under th relevant prov151ons of the Partnershlp Act, hav1ng 1ts registered office and principal place of business at Om Kutir, Jail Road, Raipur MgP. 2. BAJRANGLAL AGRAWAL, aged 36 years, son of Shri Ram Richhapal Agrawal, Managing Partner of M/s, Raipor Complex, resident of Choubey Colony, Raiur M.P. VERSUS z {‘ ~ Msc. Petition No. )7‘7) of 1993. \ ' PETI TIONERS : 1 . RESPONDENTS 1, RAIPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, under‘the a body corporate M.P. Municipal duly constituted ‘Corporati— 7} 3' on‘Act, 1956, having common seal, g and perpetual successmn and hav1ng ‘ its prinCipal office at Malv1ya Road Raipur M.P. .«Wf‘ e THE ADMEIISTRATOR Raipur Municipal ‘Corporation, Malv1ya Road, Raipur ‘M.P. 5. TI-E' REVHVUE OFFICER, Raipur Municipal Corp oration, Town Hall, Raipur M.'P. PETITION UNDER AETICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS; CERTIORARIZ PROHIBITION ETC/ ETC AND] OR FOR ORDER/ORDERS AND/OR DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS IN NATURE OF WRITS M0 e i p W ‘ V g? HEGH COURT OF CHHAITISGARH AT BILASPU R, WRIT PETITION No. 1771 of 1 993 PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDEA WW SB: Hon’hEe Shri Satish K. Agnihotri 4” g Present: None for the peiitioner. Shri Kaahif $11akeel, Advocate for the respondems. ORDER ORAL) (Passed on 03f day of August, 201 1) 1. The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor i$ any representation made on behalf of the petitioner. The oatitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. 2. In View ofthe above, the matter is dismissed for want f proseourion. 3. Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the petitioner, fonhwith Sdl- ‘ _ Satish K. Agmhotn Judge v /Mf Amit o / PETITIONER M/s. Raipur Complex & Anoiher. VERSUS RESPONDENTS Raipur Municipal