S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9671/2009 Shiv Prakash Purohit. vs. State of Rajathan & Ors. Date : 12.10.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.Rajesh Choudhary, for the petitioner. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. According to the petitioner himself, he was appointed as Vidhyarthi Mitra in the month of September, 2007 and he worked upto April, 2008. The petitioner admittedly was not the person holding the post of Vidhyarthi Mitra when the judgment in SB Civil Writ Petition No.4652/2009 deciding 632 connected writ petitions vide judgment dated 8.5.2009 was passed by this Court. By that judgment, it has been held that automatic termination orders of the petitioners are set aside and the respondents were directed to continue the petitioners in service till regularly selected candidates by regular mode of recruitment are made available. The petitioner's contention is that since he worked as Vidhyarthi Mitra in the year 2007-2008 and even when he was not a person holding the post of Vidhyarthi Mitra, yet he was entitled to continuation by virtue of the order passed in said SBCWP No.4652/2009. The writ petitioners who were already in service and sought to be removed by another set of ad-hoc appointees, then they have been granted relief that they cannot be removed till regular set of candidates by regular mode of appointment are available. The petitioner who was not in service cannot take the benefit of judgment rendered in SBCWP No.4652/2009 for getting appointment under the garb of continuation of service with those persons who were already in service in the year 2008-2009 and, therefore, the petitioner was not entitled to any relief. In view of the above reasons, this writ petition, having no merits, is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya