IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10571 of 2005 KULMATIYA w/o late Nandu Manjhi resident of Mohalla- Bhawar Pokhar, P. S. Pirbahore, District- Patna…. Petitioner. Versus 1. THE PATNA MUNICIPAL Corporation, through its Administrator, Budh Marg, Patna-1. 2. The Administrator, Patna Municipal Corporation Budh Marg,Patna. 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Budh Marg, Patna. 4. The Chief Account Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Budh Marg, Patna-1. … Respondents. --------- For the Patna Municipal Corporation : Mr. Chandrashekhar, Sr. Adv. : Mr. Poonam Kumari Singh, Adv. ----------- 7. 7.05.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the Patna Municipal Corporation. The grievance of the petitioner in this case remains confined to the payment of family pension. Counsel for the Corporation submits that the family pension to the petitioner for a period of five years is payable provided certain informations required by the Corporation is supplied by the petitioner along with an indemnity bond. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has already given such information and is also ready to give an indemnity bond. In that view of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to ensure 2 that after completing the necessary formalities the admissible family pension to the petitioner must be paid within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. If the petitioner does not complete any formality or makes herself responsible in delaying sanction and payment of family pension, the competent authority of the corporation will be under obligation to give information to this effect in writing but in no event, the matter should remain pending after a period of three months on this score. With the aforementioned direction, this writ petition is disposed of. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)