1 S.B.CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.787/2006 (Dharma Ram Vs. State & Ors.) Date of order : 3.9.2007 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. Sandeep Mehta, for the petitioner. Mr. Vishnu Kachwaha, Public Prosecutor. Mr. Pradeep Choudhary, for non-petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the order impugned dated 2.8.2006 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge (Fast Track) Nagore framing charges against the petitioner for offence under Sections 307 and 323 I.P.C. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that according to the facts of the case and the fact that compromise has arrived at in between the parties, no case for offence under Section 307 I.P.C. is made out against the petitioner. From the record of the case, it appears that the trial Court has not applied its mind at the time of framing charges against the petitioner. Therefore, in the interest of justice, while quashing the impugned order dated 2.8.2006, the case is remitted to the trial Court with a direction to decide the matter afresh on the question of charge, after hearing both the parties and taking into consideration the fact that compromise has arrived at in between the parties. 2 With the aforesaid observation and directions, the revision petition is disposed of. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J . arun