IN THB HIGH QS0RF 0F PageNfli. r ^^^/. .04 ( CaHaffiTXSG&BHl WS'S PETITI0N H©*S2^~;?-/2©QS PETITIONER r ^; ^ ^ ^^ •^^"" „ VBSSffS ^:>" BSSBBSBBr^ Sto^l ^a^apa l8»ashthA Tfatieagh Shrl Maraish a »aSttey 'LgftQ lyjJaVape EUL^shaW ©a»ag®' Heea Nagar Near ikjBhlrwad %aVe^i B31a%iaa? (G*®!1) !• Stgte @f Chhattlsgaafe Thaaaagh s €hie£seopetary B<fcc!at.i©a B^aEtaeafe , See»©fearidfel|»ICfs;tegh m^avt^ Ra^paa' (C^«) ^, Ghlaf BaBcative 0ffA©eic Mstriet Pg^ehayat Blla^ar ("G^) - ^ Ma^er secretasy» setteefeJba CbBaeaAtfeee ©IstriefeB^ae^ayafe Bila^ar ('<3^)«. •- PBTITIQN ®NBERXBSriCt.B 226/227 <»F THB Q^ST2T@T3i01S 0F 3!SBIA ¥@R ISS^aNGE @P APPfi&KfiIJffB WRIT^ ©REER ©IffiBBSA»E> XI-HC-22 3TI^T^T f^TWW^T ^W^^Tf^cf ^a=t WRC'TT^PT •<ii^i<n<<, ^Ttl^Ko, fadiyy 3ll^l_M5|<t» -.•.^j?.^?:^3fe-C ....-^4............;...^ 300 ^ TO ft^' ^T ^<TTW KI^Ct 05.08.2005 Shri S,K, Mishra, couns^l Shri Paiikaj Shrivas-tava, State/ respondents, I.A. No. 6284 of 2005; This is aa application f^r urgent hearuig. The matter is taken up on Boax'd. This iiiteriiii application| staiids disposed of. W.P. No. 32S7 of 2005:1 Heard Shri S.K. Mishr^ Shri Pankaj ShrivastavaJ State/ respondents. Leanied counsel for th^ the petitioner was fuUy qualifij Paachayat Sliiksha Karmi select the petitioner on fh.e haviug valid experience requi^ szibmits that the petitioner wa^ required for the said post respondents was illegal. Admittedly, the post for| Uie appouitoient, is govenied) Paiichavat Shiksha Karm.is Rules, 1997 and there is a tlie aforesaid rules. cbl^Id^nTl ^i<4<nT^te^'<Ri^i< ^3ri^T3T1^T for the petitioner. Paael Lawyer for fhe :4, counsel for the petitioner aad Paiiel Lawyer for the petitioner subm.its that though ?d for appoin.tmeut to the post of Gjj-ade-II, the rcspondents did not gr|3und fh.at fhe petitioner was not ?d for fhe said post. He further havhig a valid experience as was ^uid the decision taken by the which the petitioner is clauniag by tlie provisions of M.P.(C.G.) (R^ruitiaent, Conditions of Service ) pro^ision ofappeal under Rule 12 of J. XI-HC-22 3^'^qraRpT, ®Tnwc,(<i<ii«y 3ll^lM5|Cft HiN<ni $hHi<»»^^••^•""•"•••^^^ 200 26 3?n^5T^T RTii<=b3n^T sb*ii<»»«Ra ^u/i^^ -^ ^n^T^Rnw^f^f --^s- In view of this legal 1 <ftl<<Ta<(l»lHl^<rtl ^Tfe^iRti^K ^3:rf^T3TI^T )osition, leamed counsel for tlie petitioner prays forwithdraw^l of tiiis petition with. a Mbert)7 to file a duly constituted appeal l^efore the concemed auth.ority. This prayer is allowed. This petition is disaiiss^ Uberfr^7 to the petitiouer to fil^ the conipetent autliority ia ac<| The petition staiids fiaapy disposed of d as withdrawn with the aforesaid a duly coustituted appeal before 'ordaace with law, SdJ- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge (^^PT)