( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 216 OF 2009 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5556 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3175 OF 2005 Pandhari s/o. Deoba Waghmare .. Appellant Versus The State of Maharashtra and anr. .. Respondents Shri K.M. Nagarkar, Advocate for the appellant. Shri S.P. Dound, A.G.P. for the respondents. CORAM : P.R. BORKAR,J. DATED : 20.07.2009 P.C. :- 1. Heard Adv. Shri K.M. Nagarkar for the petitioner. This Contempt Petition is filed stating that there is violation of order passed by this Court dated 11.08.2008 in Civil Application No. 5556 of 2009 in Writ Petition No. 3175 of 2005. The relevant part of the order is as under:- ( 2 ) “3) By rejecting this application, we clarify that pendency of this writ petition would not come in way of the respondents in deciding the said representation expeditiously in accordance with law. Accordingly, this application is dismissed with the aforesaid clarification.” 2. There is no direction by this Court. The only clarification is that representation filed by the petitioner may be considered and decided expeditiously according to law. The learned A.G.P. also drew my attention to affidavit para 6 filed on 20.06.2005. After going though the same I am not satisfied that this is a case where contempt is prima facie committed. Hence, this Contempt Petition is dismissed. [P.R. BORKAR,J.] snk/2009/JUN09/cp216.09