-»- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAIW. BILASPUR W.P.(SlNo. 4638 of 2007 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 2 3 4 Dilip Singh Bisen, aged about 61 years, son of Late Shri Khuman Singh Bisen, resident of - Mata Dewala Ward, Bhatapara, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Versus State of Chhattisgarh Through ifs Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralay, Raipur (C.G.) The Cotlector, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) The District Education OfRcer, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) The Block Educalion Officer, Bhatapara, Distt. Raipur (C.Q.) Appearance: Shri Prakash Mishra, counsel for tto pe^Boner. Shri Yashwant Singh, Govt. Advocate for the State on Advance copy. ORALORDER (13.08.2007) SUNILKUMARSINHA. J. Heard finally with the consent of the parties. The petitioner, who is worldng as an ftssU. Teacher in New Hindi Primary School, Bhatapara- A, has challenged the vatidity of transfer order dated 22.7.2007 (Annexure-P/1), where by he has been transferred from New Hindi Primary School, Bhatapara- A to Pr'imaiy School Chadiya, Block Tilda, Distt. Raipur on administrath/e grounds. Referring to the photocopy of the retevant page of the service book, tearned counsel for the petiUoner argues that the date of birth of fhe petitioner is 17.2.1946, according to which, the petitioner Is going to retire in the month of February, 2008. His contention is thataccording to Clause 7 of the transfer policy dated 13th June, 2007, if a person is to retire within a period of one year, his case shatt be governed by the said clause of the policy. He refere to policy (Annexure-P/2). Clause 7 of the policy reads as under: "7 ^H in^tq •^[s^ ^t tlqiRllrcl ^ ^P? 1 ^^T^ra^r%im?t,^-r{?^^ \ 3!S-TqT ^T^ te?T ^ l^ ^t ^?w ten ^r W.P.(S)No. 4638 of 2007 w^n, T^ -yHM ^RR? qRcra ^ BI^N ?f5 si^tq^r r Having heard learned counsel for the petitfoner, having gone through the contents of the writ petitionand the content of clause 7 of the policy, in ttie opinion of this Court, the ends of jistice would be served,rf the petitioner is directed to flle a representation before the concerned authority invoking the provisions of clause 7 of the policy framed in Annexure-P/2 and the said authority is directed to dispose of the same within the stipulated time granted by this Court. Accordingty, this petition is disposed of wrttti a direction that if so advised, the petitioner may file a detailed representation before the concemed authority wfthin a period of 3 weeks from today along with copy of this order and the copy of writ petitton, raising his grievance, and if such a representation is flled, the concemed authority shall dispose of the same as eariy as possible preferably wtthin a period of 2 months from the date of receipt of the said representation. It is dirther directed that in the meanwhile, the petitioner shall not be relieved from his present place of posting (Bhatapara) and shall be altowed to continue there. The petition stands finally disposed of. |— Sd?- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge