IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13619 of 2002 Between: Smt. K.Geetha W/o K.Venkatadri H.No.680-1, 3rd Ward, Narasimharaopeta, N.H.-5 road, fire Station Centre, Rep by its G.P.A.Sri K.Venkatadri. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Eluru Municipal Council Rep by its Godavari District. Eluru, W.G.District. 2 Commissioner Eluru Municipality, Eluru, W.G.District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents:NONE APPEARED The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the above named petitioner prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ Order or Direction more Particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the proceedings issued by the 2nd respondent in U.C.B.A no.190/2000/G2 dt.20.7.2002 as illegal and void and consequently set aside the same.” At the hearing, Sri A.Ramalingeswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that as the petitioner intends to avail alternative remedies, she does not seek to pursue this writ petition. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail alternative remedies. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 4th MARCH, 2009. kvni