IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25004 of 2008 RAJU DAS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18/07/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State. The case under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code has been registered. The petitioner is named accused. According to the allegation, when the informant was coming then he was intercepted and looted. In course of search of the criminals, the informant spotted a person who has stopped his Rickshaw who was Jugnu Kumar. He has disclosed the name of this petitioner and others who were his associates. Submission is that there is no recovery from the petitioner. He has no criminal antecedent. He has not been identified by the informant rather his name has come on the basis of confession of co- accused. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner Raju Das is directed to be released on bail on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Gaya in connection with Delha P.S. Case No. 35 of 2008. avin. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)