1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 3680 of 2009 [State of Mah. Vs. Deonath D. Hirekhan] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. S.S. Doifode, APP for applicant. Mr. Lubesh Meshram, Adv., for respondent. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 01st April, 2010. 1. Heard. 2. Reasons due to which the learned Sessions Judge has rejected the application for cancellation of bail are spelt out in para 2 of the impugned order, which are seen at page 39. 3. This factual aspect has not been disputed even before this Court. 4. All that is argued is that the accused should have obtained signatures of the police personnel before whom his attendance was marked or noted. 5. Nothing prevented the applicant-State from getting affidavits of the officers whose 2 names were given in para 8 of the application. 6. In this background, the application has no merit, and is rejected. Judge |Hedau|