IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc. No.M- 34476 of 2009 Date of decision: 29.3.2010 Pawan Kumar ......Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY. PRESENT: Mr.G.K.Hundal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.S.S.Mor, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr.P.S.Jammu, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 4 to 10. **** ORDER The present petition has been filed for directions to respondents No. 1 to 3 to conduct fair and speedy investigation in case FIR No. 79 dated 21.7.2009 under Sections 323/325/148/149 IPC registered at Police Station Ellenabad. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner as well as other injured suffered grievous injuries on various parts of their body and they were medico-legally examined by the doctor. As per report of the doctor, there was an incised wound on right thumb of the petitioner and intention of the accused was clear from the injuries caused by them to the petitioner as well as to other injured. Notice of motion was issued in this case on 7.12.2009 and reply has been filed on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3 which has been taken on Crl.Misc. No.M- 34476 of 2009 [2] record. Mr.S.S.Mor, learned Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana submits that the matter has been investigated thoroughly by D.S.P.Ellenabad and accused Subhash was not found to be involved in the commission of crime and challan against other accused has been presented in the Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that accused Subhash has wrongly been discharged by the police as he played a very active role in causing injuries. Keeping in view the stand taken by the State and considering the fact that other accused had been challaned and accused Subhash was not found to be involved in the investigation conducted by the Investigating Agency, no ground is made out to interfere at this stage and the petition is dismissed. However, if the petitioner is aggrieved with the order of discharge of accused Subhash, he would be at liberty to avail an alternative remedy in accordance with law. (DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE March 29, 2010. raghav