IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.18808 of 2011 Gorakh Bhagat son of Vashish Bhagat resident of village Daudnagar, P.S. Bidupur, Dist. Vaishali ……Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar …………………..Opposite Party. ---------------------------------- 4 14.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is accused in Bidupur P.S. Case No. 97 of 2001 registered under section 304-B, 201/34 of the Indian penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to misunderstanding. In fact his wife deceased Seema Devi was suffering from loose diarrhea and died when she was being taken to P.M.C. for treatment. It is also submitted that trial in respect of some other accused is going on in the court of A.D.J. –II, in which the informant has been examined and she has not supported the case of the prosecution. Learned A.P.P. submitted that the trial of the accused is going on and there is serious charge against the petitioner of killing his wife for dowry. The petitioner is husband of the deceased Seema Devi and he has been made accused in this case 2 with the allegation that that due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry he killed his wife and disposed of the dead body. Considering the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, if the trial is not concluded within six months, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail thereafter. M.Rahman (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)