W33? $E§§i€~§LE Emmi IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0.’~¥@:H OF 2011 PETITIONERS Saphed Kumar Panigrahi, S/o Shri Duryodhan Panigrahi, aged about 50 years, Alkesh Kumar Panigrahi, S/o Shri Saphed Kumar Panigrahi, aged about 26 years, Praveen Kumar Panigrahi, S/o Shri Saphed Kumar Panigrahi, aged about 24 years, AII are R/o - Village, Post and Police Station— Saria, District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS The State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the Secretary, Nagriya Prashashan Avam Vikas Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ‘ The Collector, Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) The Sub~Divisional Officer (R), Sarangarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) The Naib Tahsldar, Circle Saria, Tahsil— Baramkela, District— Raigarh (C.G.) ///:g\ x; ll Wkw o\\ \ fwwmm I“ . fw The Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat— Saria, District- Raigarh (C.G.) PAGE» Q3 WRIT INDIA PETITION FOR ISSUANCE QNDER ARTICLE OF APPROPRIATE 226 OF THE WRIT CON§TITUTION DIRE TION OF N HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :— Shri Roop Naik, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Adv‘ General with Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents and respondent] Nagar Panchayat - Saria. O R D E R (Passeo on this 15‘“ day of December, 2011) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that the respondent authorities have decided to withdraw the impugned notice dated 18-11-2011 (Annexure — P/1), as no sufficient time Was given, and if necessary fresh notice shall be issued affording proper opportunity of hearing to the respective person to put fonivard their case, if any. In view of the above, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sdl— SATISH K. ANGNrHOTRI Judge ‘lN:r‘ WR!T PETITION (C) NO.7071 OF 2011 PETITIONERS Saphed Kumar Panigrahi & Others Versus RESPONDENTS The State of Chhattisgarh & Others