IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3593 of 2009 AMARDEO TIWARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 2.9.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is relation of informant’s brother who was in litigating term at that time. While submitting final form accusing several others, the police has exonerated him but I find myself unable to understand the occasion of observation made by the police when this petitioner was not named in the F.I.R rather the victim names him with his participation rather his presence where he was kept in course of kidnapping. Act of the police apparently appears suspicious though summoning any accused under section 319 Cr.P.C. is exception but here in the case it clearly appears that every attempt was made by the police to save this petitioner. So in name of relation of the informant’s brother that also not of near relation, I find no justification to allow the petitioner on bail. Accordingly prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI