IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1297 of 2009 1. BAJRANGI SINGH S/O SRI BISHWANATH SINGH VILL.- PATKHAULIA, PO- KARMA, P.S.- NASRIGANJ, DIST.- ROHTAS ………PETITIONER Versus 1. THE GENERAL MANAGER PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, CHANAKYA PLACE, R.BLOCK, PATNA- 800001 2. SENIOR REGIONAL MANAGER PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, REGIONAL OFFICE, REGAL HOTEL, ARA, P.S.- ARA, DIST.- BHOJPUR 3. VIGILENCE CELL PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, CHANAKYA PLACE, R.BLOCK, PATNA-1 4. BRANCH MANAGER PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK ITMAH, P.S.- NASRIGANJ, DIST.- ROHTAS 5. BRANCH MANAGER PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK SURAJPURA, P.S. SURAJPURA, DIST.- ROHTAS 6. SHEE KANT SHARMA S/O SRI GOPAL TIWARY VILL.- DAHIYARI, P.S.- KARAKAT, DISTT.- ROHTAS 7. PAWAN KUMAR S/O SRI RAMA SHANKAR PANDEY VILL.- SURAJPURA, P.S. SURAJPURA, DISTT.- ROHTAS …………RESPONDENTS. For the appellants: Mr. Sumndra Pratap Singh assisted by Sri Hemendra Pd. Singh. For P.N BanK: Mr. Mahesh Narayan Parbat. ----------- 04/ 10.01.2011 Having heard counsel for the parties and taking into account that the appointment of the private respondents 6 and 7 does not suffer from any error, the grievance of the appellant-writ petitioner as with regard to his non-selection and appointment on the post of sweeper is wholly misconceived. Merely because the name of the appellant-writ petitioner was also forwarded by the concerned Employment Exchange would 2 not clothe him with any right of being appointed. Having held so, all that we can observe is that if and when future vacancies on the post of sweeper arise, the case of the appellant-writ petitioner shall also be considered along with others in accordance with law. With the aforementioned observation and direction, this appeal is disposed of. Ranjan (T. Meena Kumari,J) (Mihir Kumar Jha,J)