C.R.No.4275 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.4275 of 2009 Date of Decision : 31.7.2009 M/s Kali Ram Jai Parkash ...Petitioner Versus Sat Pal ...Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: Mr. Rajinder Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated 8.5.2009 passed by the trial Court, whereby the defendant was called upon to produce his account-books for the purpose of cross- examination at the instance of plaintiff. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that the account-books for the period not later than 3 years can be called for the purpose of cross-examination, as any claim beyond 3 years would be barred by limitation. The plaintiff has sought the account-books for the purpose to cross-examine the defendant with the entries recorded in his account- books. What would be consequences of the entries is yet to be examined by the trial Court. There is no provision that only account-books for a period 3 years prior to filing of suit can be called for the purpose of cross- examination. In view of the above, I do not find any patent illegality or C.R.No.4275 of 2009 2 irregularity in the order passed by the learned trial Court, which may warrant interference by this Court in the present revision petition. Dismissed. 31.7.2009 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE