1 cp217.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.217 OF 2011 [Inderlal s/o Tulsomal Kamora vs. The State of Mah. & Ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. Anil Kasliwal (Jain), Advocate for petitioner. Mr. D.R. Kale, AGP for State. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 21ST JUNE, 2011 PER COURT : Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2. Perused the contents of the contempt petition and also documents placed on record. According to the Counsel for the petitioner, the Commissioner in Appeal has not followed the directions given by the Division Bench of this Court in bunch of writ petitions in W.P. No.654 of 1980 and other accompanying writ petitions. 2 cp217.11 3. It is admitted position that the petitioner did not file any writ petition. There are no specific directions or orders passed by this Court in his writ petition. Counsel for the petitioner argued that, the judgment and order passed in bunch of writ petitions is applicable in the case of the present petitioner. . In my opinion, it is difficult to infer anything, this Court is not aware about the facts in those writ petitions and the facts of the petitioner’s case. 4. In that view of the matter, in my opinion, there is no disobedience of any order brought to the notice of this Court. Hence the contempt petition stands disposed of. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/JUN11