IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Criminal Revision No. 2 of 2001 Shankar Datt S/o Mathura Datt Bhagat R/o village Shyamkhet P.S. Bhowali, District Nainital ..Revisionist. Vs. State of Uttaranchal ..Respondent. Sri Lokendra Dobhal, learned counsel for the revisionist. Sri S.P.S. Panwar, learned G.A. for the respondent. Date: November 21 , 2003. Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J. Today informant injured Tulasi Devi and the revisionist-accused Shankar Datt appeared in person and application for permission to submit compromise has been submitted by the said injured. She had been identified by Sri Lokendra Dobhal Advocate. The application is supported by an affidavit. It may be pointed out that Smt. Tulasi Devi volunteered that she has entered into compromise without any coercion and duress and that she intend to maintain cordial relations with her neighbour. 2- The parties are neighbours and, therefore, in the interest of justice, so that they remain in peace and their relations may remain cordial, the permission to file the compromise is accorded 3- Considering this, the compromise filed on record is duly verified and is accepted. The application and affidavits shall be numbered by the Registry and these be retained on the record. 4- The revision is allowed in terms of the compromise and the judgment of the appellate Court dated 18-11-2000 is set aside and the revisionist Shankar Datt is acquitted of the charges under sections 323/325 I.P.C. His bail bonds are discharged. (Irshad Hussain, J.) ISB