IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1537 of 2010 1. HARI LAL MAHTO S/O SHUKAR DAS MAHTO R/O VILL- BITHWA, P.S DAWATH, DISTT- ROHTAS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ROHTAS (SASARAM) 3. THE SUB DIVSIIONAL OFFICER, BIKRAMGANJ, ROHTAS 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTT- ROHTAS 5. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BIKRAMGANJ, DISTT- ROHTAS 6. THE CIRCLE OFFICER, DAWATH, DISTT- ROHTAS 7. THE OFFICER IN CHARGE, DAWATH P.S- DISTT- ROHTAS ----------- 2. 29.07.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. On the own showing of the petitioner he worked as a daily wager till 1995. That daily wagers have no claim for regularisation stands well settled in (2010) 3 SCC 115 (State of Karnataka & ors. Vs. Ganpati Chhaya Nayak & ors.). The contention that he may have had a right tobe considered under any policy decision of the State Government dated 1.1.1990 has become academic because as per his own case he has been out of service since 1995 and seeks to enforce a policy of the year 1990 in the year 2010 with no explanation for this inordinate delay. The application is dismissed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)