g|N6lfc B'E^lflTl 6 C^ (ff^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARj-LAT BILASPUR fCHHATTISGARH1) WRITPETITION fS) N0. ^^1- _Q^2010 PETITIONER ^ ^'l^. ^^'.- ' ^>-">' ^ <^'<9 >-"S8<>> >"" D. R. Hurmade Son of Late Shri Raghavji hfurmade, aged about 61 years, Retired Assistant Director, R/o Village Gonapur, Post Umri, Vaya Prabhatpattan, Tahsil Multai, District Baitul (M.P.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS /i. ^' ..,-% V ^•-^^^"" ^-' " »®tp's>^" ;a^l.^" State ofChhattisgarh: Through: the Secretary, Agriculture Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The Director, Department of Horticulture and Firm Forestry, Near Railway Station, Telibandha, District Raipur (C.G.). The Deputy Director, Department of HortJculture and Firm Forestry, Kothi No. 40, Anand Nagar, Telibandha, Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT WRIT PETiTSON (S) N0. 5277 OF 2010 ^' ashok Petltipner D.R. Hurmade Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRiT PETITiON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF JNDIA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotrs, J.) Present:- Shri Abhishek Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.V.Shridhar, Panei Lawyer for the State/ respondents. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 19th day of January, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the Detitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with iiberty to file afresh, if new cause of action arises. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side has no objection. 3. !t is ordered as prayed for. 4. Accordingiy, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above stated iiberty. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge