a HlflH CGURT OF FHHATTNFARH AT BILASE’UR “’iit, Fmmzm @‘I NO E 45 GE'2G{}3 JL‘ . Khorbahm Ram Sahu, age about 55 year, Afgsit Teacher, SIR) Lata Sln‘i Shiv Prasad Sahu. Govt, Uitar Buniyadi Middle Sclmol Arand, Block Al‘ang, Disi‘t. Arang (CG). lK 99 §FQ?f}NnENT§ H3 Mumla Lal balm Age about? 55 year Agstt. Teacher S/o Lata Qiwm Qudmxl'rm lzl Qqhn Gavi Pnmary Ssh-301 Ghadari Blank ‘vlandsmmd, 111m. Mahasamuna {CG}. BtidlLran: Navk Age about 60 year, Asst Teachar S/n Late Shri Bodhan Kawai Middle School Mokhaia, Block Arang, Distt. Raipur (CG). Tulsi Ram Cndndrali‘u l-xge about ‘2 year. Asgtt Teachar WO Late S111; PUmrad Ram Phandr'alxm Gcvt H1 gee. §€h001 Chhzm Block Dnamtam Dml Dhamtarl (CG) Kunu 1 a1 Dlmw Ag? about #7 year H9ad M’mter S/o Lalo Snn Pusau Ram Dhruw Govt Frlmdly School AcCholl, Block Arang Dlstt. Arang (CG). Smt. Dhela Bai Dhmw Age about 52 year, Head Master, W/o Shri Kunji Lal Dhruw Govt. Primary Sehoel Hardibhata, Block Nagari, Distt. Dhamtari (CG), p. )I».Celmbi Lal Gumdatt Age about 56 year? Asst: Teacher Q/o Laie Shri vev Singh unrudati Govt kmnry School Koliyilri ock N261“, Dmit Dhamtan {CG) ..p. QI 3. 41. 5x1 I Shank "tr Chanrmya Age ahmn 60 vearg Aggy: 1 Cher, b/o Laue Snn Maid i31asdd Chouraqiya UOVt P,,x11ary 911001 Nwagwm Block Nathan, Dleit Dhamtan (uG) m Maham L111 Sahu Agg abgut i8 yearg? Assit. Teacher S/Q Lats Shri Puranik Ram Sahu Govt. Prknayy School Khursenga Black Kumd, Distt. Dham’iari (CG). Shiv Dayal Sahu Age abaut 52 ycars, Asstt. Taachm" S/o Late Shri Bairagi Ram Sahu Gmnf. Primary School Kathiya N0. 2 Block Abhanpur, Distt. Raipur (CG). Laldmn Lal Pal, Age about 51 yearsa Asstt. Tnaacher S/o Shri Maihettar Ram Fal Govt. Middle School Son Dongari Block Dhaxsiva, Dim. Raipur (CG). JaiSihzmkar Lal Yadav age about 50 yam. Asstt, Teachcr S/o Late Shri Angu Lal Yadav Govt. Primary School Amethi Block Arang. Distt. Raipur (CG). VERSUB §f¢1te n- Chhattmoarh through geeretarv Tribal Welfare Depertment & Eduoauoo uepal mom, ulxS Bhawan‘ Ralpur (CG). Asstt Commissionel Tribal Welfare Department Raipur/DhamfarlAJallqgamund Distner Eduoanon umcer, Ra.1p11r/Dhamtariflviahasamund. Treasury, Aogomm & Pensioxg RalpurfDhammn/Manasemund :1. ll. (WWT PETITION UNDER ARTICLF 2"( OT THF CONQTITUHON OF INDIA (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Sailsh K. Agmhotrg, .1} Reseaj : Slui Somkant Velma, Advocate For the oetifiooers. smt, Smite; Ghai, Page Lawyé; Em tile ‘s‘tate. \ . ) ‘ 7’ i @ h GRAL ORDER (i’assed on 26 iii ai‘ February, 2608) ..i. The; petitionesrs were initially appointed. as Assistant Taachers on fixed pay of RS. IGQ/-. Aikr aompletion of probation, the. pgtitioners were gamed regular pay scala Similarly gituated, remployeas had approaahed the Matihya Fradash State Administrative Tribimal, Jabaipm: The Tributml pag‘séd thg order 011 24081992. in. 0.2% N0. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State ofMR ,&, Othem.) It waS further hald that the Said; be-naflt would ha givet, t0 all tlm teachers and thay should not be compalied to approach tha Tribunal for similar benefit individually or collectively. Being aggrieved. the then State of Madhya. Pradesh had filed the Special Leave Petition (Civil) Not 6892/93 impugning the order dated 24.08.1992 pasged by the, Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribmmi, Jahalpur ‘m 0A. N0. 2745/89. The Hen'ble Supreme Court after hearing counsei for the parties, dismissed the Special Leave Peiitien mid imviag regard to the large tmancial implieations, granted 0n? year‘s time to settle the claim for the arrears w'thmit interest Vide order dated 03.01.1994. it wee thither obeerved that the intervention would work out their rightg in accortlanee with law This order dated 24.08.199 )I? U) 2“ pegged. by the Tribunal in (1A No. 2743/1989 iS applicable to the petitioners heihg Similarly situated 311i tjey are eeoordingly entitled to the same henetit. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that this Court while considering the Same iesue in Ram Kumar Sahu and others Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and another in Writ ?etition {8) No. 813 of 2007 by order dated 110220075 haS gained regular pay scale wef. the date of initial appointment. Learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that this case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the ease of Rant Kunxar Sshu and others Vs. State Govt. of Chhettisgarh and another (Supra). Howevery the state is at liberty to verify the facts of appointment asto F" 12.022007 passed by this court in W3 (S) No. 813 of 2Q0’7 (Supra). ff; my t J1 Viaw of that this petitim: is aliowed. m théa game farms La pgi'it'iomrs (m? emiflgd to ’ths samg relief as wag granted by the. Madhya Pradesiz State Administrativs Tribunai, Jabalpljr in GA. Na. 2745/89 (Madhukam Ymiu mid 56 othsrs Vs. State 0f M‘P. & others) and subsequgntiy confixmed by order dated. 03:01.94 paSsed by the Hon‘ble Supreme. Court in Special Leave Patition (Civil) N0, 6892/93. The pétitioners £181! be govemed by the ordars passed by tha Tribunal as well as by the Hall‘ble Supreme Court (supra) accordingly. No order mx Sd/~ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge am) costs: ”t W dWw/ r