IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 16TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 25TH KARTHIKA 1931 LA.App..No. 141 of 2007(A) ------------------------- LAR.188/2003 of SUB COURT, QUILANDY .................... APPELLANT(S):RESPONDENT -------------------------------------------- THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOZHIKODE. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BEENY VARGHESE RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT/CLAIMANT R2, IN LAR --------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SULEKHA, D/O. PAKRUTTY, CHEENIYULLATHIL, POOVAMBAYI, KINALUR, KOYILANDY TALUK. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.N. KRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = L.A.A. NO. 141 OF 2007 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 16th day of November, 2009. J U D G M E N T This is an appeal preferred against the award of the Land Acquisition Court, Koyilandy in LAR 188/03. 0.00125 Ares of land comprised in Sy.no.7/7 of Kinalur village was acquired for widening and strengthening the PWD road from Vattoli junction to Kinalur. The Land Acquisition Court fixed the market value at Rs.8,000.- per cent with the attending benefits. It is against that decision the State has come up in appeal. 2. A perusal of the award would show that it was a case of a common award passed in almost about 10 cases of which one case was L.A.A.129/03. Against the said award LAA 384/06 was filed before this court by KSIDC and this court by its judgment dated 18.11.08 fixed the land value at Rs.7,500/- per cent. The present case also comes under the very same notification and very same nature of properties and therefore I L.A.A. 141 OF 2007 -2- feel it proper to fix the market value of the property at Rs.7,500/- instead of Rs.8,000/- per cent. Accordingly the LAA is partly allowed and the land value is refixed at Rs.7,500/- per cent and all other attending benefits which the claimant is entitled to under the law is sustained. LAA is disposed of accordingly. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/-