1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:10.10.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Criminal Original Petition (MD) No.8876 of 2011 Thangapandi ... Petitioner Vs State rep. By the Sub-Inspector of Police, Saptur Police Station, Saptur, Madurai District. (Cr.No.138 of 2009) ... Respondent This petition is preferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C to direct the respondent police to investigate further and to file supplementary charge sheet for the offence under Section 379 I.P.C in Cr.No.138 of 2009 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner :Mr.T.A.Ebenezer For Respondents :Mr.P.Kannithevan Govt. Advocate(Crl.Side) ORDER Seeking a direction to the respondent to further investigate and file a supplementary charge sheet in Cr.No.138 of 2009, pending on the file of the respondent police on the file of the respondent police, the petitioner has come up with the present petition. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though the jewels weighing 12 sovereigns were stolen away and in respect of that a complaint had been given, the same was not investigated properly by the respondent police. 3.In my considered view, since on completing the investigation, charge-sheet has been laid, at this stage, the remedy for the petitioner lies elsewhere i.e before the lower court and not before this Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. Hence this petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to seek remedy in the manner known to law. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (Writs) /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 To 1.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Saptur Police Station, Saptur, Madurai District. 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1cc to Mr.T.A.Ebenezer, Advocate Sr.No.35126 vs ssk/31.10.2011 /4c-2p/- Crl.O.P.(md).No.8876 of 2011 10.10.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/