*1* CHS-1157-10.sxw Dixit IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1157 OF 2010 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.70 OF 2007 Anil Karorimal Agarwal ... Plaintiff V/s. SHIVOM ... Defendant Mr. S. Nagradria, i/b. M/s. Mehta & Co., for the Plaintiff. Mr. S.J. Khera for the Defendant. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 28 th November, 2011. P.C. : 1. This is a Chamber Summons for amendment. My attention is invited to the order passed on the earlier Chamber Summons and it is contended that no prejudice will be caused because in addition to the amendments that are already made, it has come to the notice of the Plaintiff that there are certain errors in the bills/invoices which have to be corrected as per the Schedule to this Chamber Summons. Therefore, this Chamber Summons be allowed and the plaint be permitted to be amended in terms of the Schedule “Annexure-A” to this Chamber Summons. 2. Mr. Khera, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Defendant, on the other hand, submits that this is not a case of any correction, as contended, but what is sought to be done is to add some figure, which does not appear in the original invoice. Further, the claim is clearly barred by limitation and cannot be granted. *2* CHS-1157-10.sxw 3. After hearing both sides, I am of the view that by keeping open all objections on the plea of limitation and also on merits, this Chamber Summons can be granted. It is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) with the same clarification as is made by this Court in order dated 1st September, 2009 in Chamber Summons No.517 of 2008. 4. Amendment be carried out within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Amended plaint be served within two weeks thereafter. (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.)