IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 18TH JUNE 2009 / 28TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 11797 of 2008(D) -------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. GEORGE JOSEPH PODIPARA MEMORIAL WOMEN'S CHARITABLE TRUST, REG.NO.K 408/06, ARPOOKARA, KOTTAYAM-8, REP:BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, ROSAMMA THOMAS, KARUKAMALALIYIL HOUSE, PERUMBAYIKKAD VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM. 2. ROSAMA THOMAS, GENERAL SECRETARY, GEORGE JOSEPH PODIPARA MEMORIAL WOMEN'S CHARITABLE TRUST, PERUMBAYIKKAD VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. MR.A.K.HARIDAS. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT, MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL, KOTTAYAM. 4. MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY, GANDHI NAGAR, KOTTAYAM-8, REP:BY ITS SECRETARY. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. N. SUDHA DEVI. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/06/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.11797/2008-D: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF THE TRUST. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION OF THE TRUST. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE REGISTRATION BOOK OF VEHICLE NO. KL-05-S-3349. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPH OF THE AMBULANCE. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.969/2008. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF PAYMENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: EXT.R3.A: COPY OF THE REGISTERED POST. EXT.R3.B: COPY OF THE SANCTION ORDER. EXT.R3.C: COPY OF THE REPORTS. EXT.R3.D: COPY OF THE MASS PETITION. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. Prv. S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 11797 of 2008 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 18th June, 2009. J U D G M E N T The petitioner filed this writ petition complaining that in spite of Ext. P5 judgment on the subject matter, the Ambulance vehicle permitted to be operated from the premises of the Medical College is now prevented from doing so on the allegation that the vehicle is registered in the name of the 2nd respondent. 2. At the time of admission, this Court passed the following interim order: “According to the petitioner, though after Ext. P5 judgment they were permitted to operate the ambulance from the premises of the Medical College, they are prevented from doing so only on the allegation that the vehicle is registered in the name of the 2nd respondent. If that be the only reason for preventing the petitioner from operating the ambulance from the premises of the Medical College, Kottayam, the respondents are directed not to prevent the petitioner from operating the ambulance from the Medical College Premises. Now, the learned Government Pleader submits that the action taken against the petitioner was not merely on the allegation that the vehicle was registered in the name of the 2nd respondent, but for other reasons also as stated in the counter affidavit. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that subsequently, the petitioner was served with another order, which was challenged by the petitioner in W.P(C) No. 15507/2008. That being so, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition insofar as the petitioner has taken up all his contentions in the other writ petition. Accordingly, without prejudice to the contentions of the petitioner in that writ petition and with liberty to raise all contentions W.P.C. No. 11797/08 -: 2 :- raised in this writ petition in the other writ petition, this writ petition is closed. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/