IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15600 of 2005 1. Mundra Kala Devi, wife of Late Rajiv lochan Karan. 2. Sanjeev Karan 3. Sanjay Karan both 2 and 3 are sons of Rajiv Lochan Karan 4. Punam Karan 5. Sangita Prasad 6. Anuradha Sahay Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER-CUM- SECRETARY, HEALTH MEDICAL EDUCATION AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY, HEALTH MEDICAL EDUCATION AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE JOINT SECRETARY, HEALTH MEDICAL EDUCATION AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE UNDER SECRETARY HEALTH MEDICAL EDUCATION AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 5. THE DIRECTOR-IN-CHIEF HEALTH SERVICES BIHAR, PATNA. 6. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICERS, PATNA. 7. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, PROVIDENT FUND DIRECTORATE PANT BHAWAN, PATNA. 8. THE TREASURY OFFICER, SECRETARIATE, TREASURY VIKAS BHAWAN, PATNA. 9. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL OF BIHAR, PATNA. ----------- 7 01.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the respondent State. The grievance of the writ petitioners is with regard to the payment of provident fund dues. During the pendency of the writ application, the original writ petitioner died and he was substituted by his legal representatives. Learned counsel for the State on instruction submits that all the admissible dues on account of the provident funds were already paid. 2 In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ application is not pressed. However, in case any discrepancy is detected by the petitioners it will be open for them to bring to the notice of the concerned authority for its rectification if any. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Amrendra/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)