C.A.No.11987 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11987 OF 2011 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.52 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.582 OF 1989 Shaikh Kausar Rizwana Abbas Ali ..Applicant Versus Khursid Naik, Secretary, Bhukari Education Society, Majalgaon, District Beed and ors. ..Respondents Mr A.V.Patil, Advocate holding for Mr V.D.Gunale, Advocate for applicant Mr S.S.Kazi, Advocate for respondents 1 and 2 Ms Priya Sawant, Advocate holding for Mr N.L.Jadhav, Advocate for respondent No.3 CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 30th November 2011 PER COURT 1. Heard. Mr Kazi submits, being aggrieved by the order in Writ Petition No.582 of 1989, letters patent appeal is preferred being L.P.A.No.183 of 2008 and admitted on 21.1.2009. This position is not disputed by Mr Patil. 2. The fact remains, in spite of the appellants in letters patent appeal, they are pressing for stay to the order in Writ Petition No.582 of 1989. It is indicated, specific prayer for stay is rejected, as spelt out in Civil Application No.12010 of 2008. Consequently, the hearing of the Contempt Petition No. 52 of 2010 sought to be expeditiously taken, warrants attention. 3. If the respondent in the Contempt Petition does not take action, as was directed in Writ Petition No.582 of 1989, on or before the adjourned date, the respondents 1 and 2 shall pay costs of Rs.15,000/- (Rs.Fifteen thousand). C.A.No.11987 of 2011 2 4. Civil Application No.11987 of 2011 for early hearing allowed. Contempt Petition No.52 of 2010 to be heard finally on 13th December 2011 at 2.30 p.m. ( K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. ) (vvr/11987.11ca)