(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 829 OF 2005 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 829 OF 2005 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 829 OF 2005 Bajrang @ Maruti Baburao Mandale (Ramoshi) ...Petitioner Versus Ramchandra Dnyanu Madane & Anr ...Respondents ..... Mr. Sudatta Patil, Advocate for Petitioner Mr. Pratap Patil, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. Rajesh More, A.P.P. for State. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. DATED: 9TH AUGUST, 2005 DATED: 9TH AUGUST, 2005 DATED: 9TH AUGUST, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. The learned advocate for the petitioner apprehends that since the learned Magistrate has directed investigation under Section 156(3), the police would file a charge-sheet. The learned A.P.P. states that it is not necessary that the police will file a charge-sheet. The learned A.P.P. further submitted that in fact if no material is revealed in respect of the petitioner the police may file a report to that effect. 2. In view of the above statement the learned advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to (-2-) withdraw the petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings if the charge-sheet is filed in respect of the petitioner. Liberty granted as prayed for. Writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such. *****