FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda ¦ of Coram, appearances, Court’s ¦ Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or directions and ¦ Registrar’s orders ¦ ______________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------- C.A.NO.756/09 IN F.A.ST.NO.554/2009. ----------------------------------- Shri N.V. Gaware, Advocate for the applicant Shri P.C. Mayure, Adv. h/f Shri S.G. Chapalgaonkar, Adv. for R.1 & 2 Shri N.L. Jadhav, Adv. for R.3. CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL,J. CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL,J. CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL,J. DATE : 09/06/2009 DATE : 09/06/2009 DATE : 09/06/2009 . Heard counsel for the respective parties. There is delay of 26 days in causing to file appeal. The delay is not deliberate. It is sufficiently explained. The appellant being Sugar Factory required to have resolution from the board meeting which also had its root cause. That apart, certified copies were served on 21/10/2008 from the learned Trial court. Considering the practical difficulty as enumerated in paragraph 7 the delay being properly explained, the application is allowed. 2) The matter needs to be heard finally at admission stage. Hence, S.O.10th July, 2009. 3) Heard Shri Gaware and Shri S.G. Chapalgaonkar, counsel. It is informed that the amount deposited by the appellant herein before the learned Lower court under Workmen’s Compensation, has been withdrawn in both the appeals. In view of this situation, there is no purpose and reason to continue with the stay petition. Consequently, stay petition in both the appeals is dismissed. Dt.09/06/2009 (K.U.CHANDIWAL) (K.U.CHANDIWAL) (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE cmg/ca75609