IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND APRIL 2008 / 13TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 3870 of 2006(I) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- SHAJITHA SHANAVAS, AGED 32 YEARS, W/O.K.A.SHANAVAS, KUDILIL HOUSE, SOUTH VELLARAPPALLY, SREEMOOLANAGARAM, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.RENJITH B.MARAR RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. THE BRANCH MANAGER, KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION LTD., BRANCH OFFICE, S.N.D.P. BUILDING, P.P.ROAD, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. M.MOHAMMED, KARUMAKKATTU HOUSE, PERUNGALA P.O. ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. SHAHIDA MOHAMMED, W/O.M.MOHAMMED, MADATHIL PARAMBIL, VENNALA P.O. ARAKKAKADAVU, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. V.AMOHAMMED KASIM, S/O.V.K.ABDUL RAHIMAN, VATHIPPARAMBIL HOUSE, VELIYATHNADU, PARAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. TECHNOCARTONS, DOOR NO.42/A/XI, KUNNATHUNADU, PERUNGALA P.O. ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR, SC, KFC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.3870/2006 I APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE POWER OF ATTORNEY DTD. 26/03/02 IS EXECUTED IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER BY HER HUSBAND. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DTD. 12/07/02. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE DEED OF PARTNERSHIP DTD. 12/07/02 EXECUTED BY THE 2ND AND 4TH RESPONDENT AND THE SAID P.B.ASIF. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE DEATH CERTIFICATE OF THE PETITIONER'S BROTHER NAMELY ASIF. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE NOTICE DTD. 16/01/06 RECEIVED BY THE PETITIONER ON 21/1/06. EXT.P6: COPY OF THE STATEMENT DTD. 28/01/2006 GIVEN TO THE PETITIONER BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT WITH REGARD TO THE LOAN ADVANCED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE 5TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P7: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 4/02/2006 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER. /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) 3870 of 2006 ------------------------------------- Dated: APRIL 2, 2008 JUDGMENT Except the request for return of the documents, it is submitted that the rest of the disputes between the parties have been settled. So far as the present request for return of the documents is concerned, the KFC has no objection. 2. In view of this, the writ petition is disposed of directing that the documents deposited by the petitioner shall be returned to the petitioner forthwith on production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-