IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22713 of 2010 GANESH SINGH @ TUNNI SINGH, Son of Late Raman Singh @ Ramanandan Singh, resident of village Baruane, P.S. Bhadaur, District Patna ….. Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR …. Opposite Party ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Shivendra Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. M. Rab, A.P.P. ----- 3 25.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State and also perused the report kept at flag ”A”. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences punishable under Sections 364(A), 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner’s prayer for bail had earlier been rejected by this Court on 24.11.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 34455 of 2009, a copy of which has been appended as Annexure 1. However, liberty was granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after six months. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that his name surfaced upon the confessional statement of the co-accused Deepak Kumar upon whose statement abducted teachers were recovered on the next date itself. It is submitted that aforesaid 2 Deepak Kumar has been granted bail by the A.C.J.M. concerned itself on 10.9.2009. Petitioner was arrested on 5.4.2009. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh in connection with Belchhi P.S. Case No. 171 of 1999, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be a close relative or family member of the petitioner, who shall file affidavit before the concerned court giving complete genealogy to show his or her relationship with the petitioner. If, after his release in this case, the petitioner is again found implicated in similar nature of cases, then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Further, the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of trial. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two 3 consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation then the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)