1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1976/2009. Prem Surana. VERSUS Addl. District Judge No.8, Jaipur City, Jaipur & Anr. 30.03.2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.M.M.Ranjan, for the petitioner. ***** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order. The petitioner is defendant-tenant in a suit filed for fixation of standard rent as well as for eviction. After the evidence of the plaintiff was completed, the defendant-petitioner moved an application for summoning certain documents from the plaintiff. The learned trial court having considered the application and the submissions made before it, in the facts and circumstances, permitted the petitioner to produce and examine all the tenants in evidence whose rent receipts/counter foils the petitioner/defendant wanted to summon from the plaintiff. 2 In the facts and circumstances, I find no infirmity in the impugned order as no prejudice is being caused to the petitioner on account of the impugned order and the facts which the petitioner want to bring out in evidence on his side can still be produced in court. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed summarily. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.