WP(C) 6061/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA. Heard Mr. B. Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. M. Khataniar, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department. This writ petition has been filed praying for a direction to the respondents to dissolve the present Managing Committee of the Madrassa in question and to re-c onstitute the same as per the provisions of the notification mentioned in the wr it petition According to the petitioner, there is mismanagement in the Madrassa and the resp ondents should carry out an enquiry to bring the culprit home. It is the further grievance of the petitioner that he is debarred from functioning as teacher of the Madrassa. However, the petitioner has not enclosed copy of his appointment o rder nor there is any order terminating his service. According to the petitioner , he has been illegally debarred from discharging his duties and functions. Admittedly, the Madrassa is a privately managed one and there is no control of t he Government in the management of the said Madrassa, It is in this context , Mr . M. Khataniar, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department has submitted tha t the writ petition is not maintainable. Unless it is shown that the Managing Committee of the Madrassa is an aut hority within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India, the petiti oner cannot claim that the said Managing Committee is amenable to writ jurisdict ion. That apart, the writ Court cannot make a roving enquiry into the illegality and/or irregularity committed by the Managing Committee of the Madrassa. It wil l be open for the writ petitioner to pursue the remedy elsewhere. Writ petition is dismissed.