081 HIGH COURT QF .JUDICATURE CHMATTISGARH zJBILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI S.R.NAYAK, GJ. ;',1 WRIT PETITION N0.6586 OF 2005 PETITIONER Vs. RESPONDENTS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Jawahar Nag Deo, S/o Shri G.D. Chandani, aged about 43 years, r/o Shyam Nagar, Infront of Maharana Pratap Garden Raipur (C.G.) The Stete of ChhatUsgarh, through Vne Secreteiy Ministry of Home Afbirs, D.K.S. Bulldlng, Raipur Superintendent of Police, Raipur(CG) Station House OfRcer, Police Station, Clvil Llne, Ralpur. Slation HouseOfflcer, Potice StaUon Tikarapara, Raipur Dr.Chetram Bajajs/e Jethanand, aged about 58yeara, President Rajiv Grih NirmanSahakari Society, Raipur, Katora Talab, Raipur (C.G.) Present: Smt. Indira Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner. ORALORDER (Passed on 3r<l January, 2006) The petitioner is a member of the Rajlv Grih Nirman Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, Raipur. The dispute brought befbrethis Court by way of Uiis writ petition relates to allotment of a site in favour of the petiUoner by the above society. SecBon 64 of the Chhattisgarh CO- operative Societies Act, 1960 (for short the AcO provides that any dispute touching the constituBon, management or business, terms and condifens of employment of a society or the liquldation of a society should be referred to the Regislrar by any ofttie parties to the dispute if the parties ttiereto are among the entities and persons specified in Ctauses (a) to @ VS!s^^£tS-W[i wvs ?.r: 8;1' ::t SBJSBSB ^S^^M'SS. 0^2 •:SStS ..z. ofsub-Secb'on (1) thereof. Underaably, the dispufe brought before this Court is by the dispute envisaged under sub-Section (1) of Section 64 of the Act.Be that as it may.the dispute brought beforethis Court does not involve enforcement of any pybllc law requirement. -Looking from that arigte also, ttie extraordinary jurisdiction of this Couit could not be invoked for resolutfon of a prh/ate dispute between the petitioner andthe above society which is said to be purely a private society and it does not satisfy tho definition of "State" as defined under Article 12 of the Constitution. For all these reasons, 1 am not inclined to entertain this writ petition. tt is dismissed accordingly. However, this order shall not come in theway of the petitioner from working out his legal remedies before any other statutory fora or Jurisdlctional clvit Coun. There shall be no order as to costs. -^— Sd/. ChiefJustice