W.P.No.377/2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.377 OF 2009 Dagadu Nana Sargar .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents Mr V.B.Patil, Advocate for petitioner Mr P.P.More, A.G.P. for respondent No.1 Mr M.A.Thorbole, Advocate holding for Mr P.R.Patil, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 29th April 2011 PER COURT 1. The grievance of the petitioner is that the Municipal Corporation i.e. respondent No.2 has not responded to the representations and/or complaints submitted by the petitioner in respect of the encroachment on a public road. That encroachment, according to the petitioner is because of a temple situated in the area and some other structures. According to the petitioner those persons who have encroached the public road have been convicted. They have been also directed to remove the encroachment but have failed to do so. No further action has been taken by the Corporation. 2. In our opinion, the petition can be conveniently disposed of by directing the respondent No.2 - Corporation to consider and decide the representations and/or complaints of the petitioner within eight weeks from today. W.P.No.377/2009 2 3. Accordingly, the respondent No.2 - Corporation is directed to consider and decide the representations and/or complaints of the petitioner within eight weeks from today. The Corporation shall communicate its decision to the petitioner immediately thereafter. 4. Petition disposed of accordingly. ( M.T. JOSHI, J. ) ( SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. ) (vvr/377.09wp)