IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.18382 of 2010 Date of Decision : October 08, 2010. Om Parkash Sanolia .....Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.K.S.Jetley, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Aggrieved by an award passed under the Haryana Co- operative Societies Act, 1984, the petitioner is said to have filed a revision petition No.73 of 2009 before the Prescribed Revisional Authority. Since no stay has been granted, the decree-holder is pursuing with the execution proceedings and has obtained an order of attachment. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner at some length and perused the order dated 3.6.2010 (Annexure P-9). In my considered view, no case to grant ad-interim stay in favour of the petitioner is made out. However, the Revisional Authority is directed to decide the petitioner's pending revision petition as early as C.W.P.No .18382 of 2010 2 possible but not later than three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. October 08, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE