IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-33474 of 2008 Date of Decision: December 18, 2008 Saroj … Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present : Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. S.D. Anand, J. (Oral) Crl. Misc. No. 58970 of 2008 Allowed, as prayed for. Crl. Misc. No. M-33474 of 2008 The learned counsel states that he would be content and interests of justice would be served if life and liberty of the petitioner and her parents is ordered to be protected and direction is issued to respondent No.2 – Senior Superintendent of Police, Ludhiana, to personally examine the grievance of the petitioner within a time bound frame. Notice of motion. Crl. Misc. No. 33474 of 2008 On the asking of the Court, Ms. Manjari Nehru Kaul, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Qua the former part of the relief, the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 shall ensure that the petitioner shall have the similar constitutional protection which is available to all the citizens of the country under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Insofar as the latter part of the relief is concerned, direction is issued to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ludhiana – respondent No.2 to personally examine the grievance of the petitioner (Annexure P/5) within a period of one month from today. Disposed of accordingly. December 18, 2008 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 2