IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.57439 OF 2007 DEEPAK KUMAR PANDEY @ DEEPAK PANDEY, SON OF SHRI RAJ KUMAR PANDEY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE/MOHALLA ANUGRAH NARAYAN ROAD, POLICE STATION KOTWALI, DISTRICT GAYA ………………….…PETITIONER VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. RAMESH KUMAR, DRUG INSPECTOR, GAYA URBAN (WHOLESALE) AND MANUFACTURING, COMBINED BUILDING, GAYA ……………………………………………………………………….OPPOSITE PARTIES ******** 4 18/04/2011 Heard Counsel for the petitioner and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner has moved this Court against the order taking cognizance dated 21.12.2005 under Section 32 and 18 (a) (ii) and 27 (A) (A) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. This Court by order dated 29.09.2010 had called for a report from the Trial Court regarding the status of the case. The report that has reached before this Court is contained at Flag-X, which indicates that the case is pending for evidence, meaning thereby that charges have been framed in the case and the trial has already commenced. In the circumstances, it would not be proper for this Court to interfere with the order taking cognizance. This application is accordingly dismissed. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )