IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.110 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.110 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.110 OF 2006 The CIT-9 .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Eyeque Investments and Trading Company Pvt.Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant. None for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ. V.C.DAGA, JJ. V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATE : 7th October, 2008 DATE : 7th October, 2008 DATE : 7th October, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant. By this Appeal Appellant is seeking to raise two substantial questions of law as mentioned in paragraph No.5 of the Appeal Memo. 2. Perused an order of the ITAT dated 30.8.2005. Specially for the reasons given in paragraph Nos.4 & 5 of the said order and in view of the clear findings given therein, we find that the present Appeal is based on finding of facts. No substantial question of law is involved in this Appeal. Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)