IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M.No.M-16079 of 2009 Date of Decision: 6.7.2009 Sheru and another ..Petitioners. Vs. State of Haryana ..Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present : Ms.Monisha Lamba, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Partap Singh, Sr.DAG Haryana for the respondent-State. RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. Counsel for the petitioners submits that as far as petitioner No.1 is concerned, she is not pressing the bail application on her behalf. The petition is dismissed qua petitioner No.1. Counsel for the petitioners submits that no case is made out against petitioner No.2. As against this, counsel for the State submits that three other cases are already registered against petitioner No.2 vide FIR No.12 of 2008 under Section 379 IPC, P.S.Hathin; FIR No.20 of 2008 under Section 379 IPC, P.S.Hathin and FIR No.44 of 2008 under Section 25 of Arms Act P.S.Bhiwari in Rajasthan. Keeping in view the antecedents of the petitioner No.2, this Court is of the view that concession of anticipatory bail can not be extended to the petitioner. Hence, the present bail application qua petitioner No.2 is dismissed. (Rakesh Kumar Jain) 6.7.2009 Judge Meenu