RESPONDENT : IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPtfft CHHATTISGARH t.-.^" ^l^ -^•' ^W.PNo. ^700/2001 Writ Petition Under article 226/227 ofthe Constitution oflndia j-t—; S.K.Naik S/o R.L. Naik, Aged about 39 Years presently working as cashier cum Clerk at Dharamjai garh Kshetriya Gramin Bank, braach Bank of( Raigarh Kshetriya Gramin Bank, Head Office StationRoad Raigarh). Dist-Raigarh,(C.G.) VERSUS President (Chaimian), Raigarh Kshetriya Gramia Bank, (Head OfBce Station Road Raigarh). XI-HC-22 , an^r^r W?;3ltW ^i^w yre^i •ysi':wvpf, ^twre, fawi'y^ 'HTHWI «ill<n 3lAn tWW<. •uRd ._M.?...nvb. •w, wfeH^ wrai •?fe^ '^R?T< i|T aipiPT 3!^T Shri K.N. Nande,coiuisel !for the petitioner. Shri P. Diwakar, coiuisel for the respbndeat. By fhis writ petitiou zu^der Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India the petitii()ner who is workiag as Casbier ciun Clerk ia Kshetriya Graauii Bank tirancli Dharamjaigar}i has challenged bis traasfer orddr-dated 27.06.2001 wherebv the petitioner has been transferr^d to Kshetriya Gramia Baak branch Hati, District RaiRarh, on fhe eround that fhe said. traasfer order is niala&de, arbiljrarv', viadictive and against fhe declared traasfer policy, fherefo|~e, he has prayed fhat ftie said transfer order (Aiuiexure P-3) be [quashed. I tiave heai'd fhe learaed ccjunsel for the parties. Learued counsel for fhe| respondent sutinuts tbsct on account of closiire of SirsiQga b^-ancli where the petitioner was earlier working siace 1996, |he was asked to worlc at Dharamjaigarh braach along TCJith otb.er staff aad when fhe accounts of new brauch were se^fled, certaia einployees became surplus, fherefore, the petitionei(was traiisferred. However, the petitioner on fhe basis of tlie st^y order graated by fhis C^urt has contpleted tliree years at Dha^-amjai Garh branch. In the circuiastances, I d^ein it appropriate to set aside fhe trausfer order as ftie petitioi^er is worldng siace last tbree years at Dharamjai Garh tirancjti on the basis of stay orcler ;raated in his favour. Therefore, t|ie impugned order is quashed. 9 -59. ai I-HC—78 w^r^ir Ri gqi 31^1 skqi<t, fc 3^T '^ww-'i, ®Ti1y<|(o,fadi-iy ^? \^'"> Ldjr sn^r-'raqTC y) ^I^Ed^l 'WT^f ^ tSTst if^l^g.R ^aifOT sil^l Rai^arh oiler However, the petitioner is representation wifhin. a perio^ Kshetriya Gramin Banlc, time of transfer of fhe petitioij Uberty to pass an. appropriate his grievances. It is niade cle'ar fhat fhi^ the respondent to decide, to place. With fhe above directiont Consequently, M.W.P. N4 also stand disposed of. Certi&ed copy as per Rulfcs aUowed to make a detailed of ten dav's to fhe Chainaaii of for his consideration at the o4er, in tuin respondent v.iB be at |order of postuig after considering ord.er wiU not coiae in the wav if c^iitiriue, fhe petitioaer at fh.e same ., the petition stands disposed of. [i.l522/2001 &I.A.N0.4969/2001 Sd/- L.C.BHADOO Judge 'll •