IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 9414 of 2010 Date of Decision: 20.5.2010 Satya Devi ....Petitioner. Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Amit Dhawan, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. In this petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to decide his application dated 17.2.2010 (Annexure P-1) for sanction of the site plan. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made a representation dated 6.4.2010 (Annexure P-2) to the respondents for the same relief as claimed in this writ petition and he shall feel satisfied if a direction is issued to them to decide the said application in a given time frame. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the file, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned respondent to decide the application (Annexure P-1) filed by the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. May 20, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE