IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3512 of 1990 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE J.N.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- GUJARAT BANK WORKERS UNION Versus UNION BANK OF INDIA -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 3512 of 1990 MR HJ NANAVATI for Petitioner No. 1-5 MR KN PATEL for Respondent No. 1-2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE J.N.BHATT Date of decision: 03/08/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT Learned advocate Mr.H.J.Nanavati appearing for the petitioner no.1- Gujarat Bank Workers Union, under instructions, states that the dispute would not survive, as the policy which was under challenge, has already been revised and, therefore, the petition would not survive. In view of the aforesaid statement, the petition shall stands dismissed having become infructuous. Rule is discharged. No order as to costs. Interim relief, if any, shall stand vacated. [ J.N.BHATT, J ] SNS