IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.M-22406 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 5.10.2009. Rajeev @ Lucky ....Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Ritu Punj, DAG Haryana. RAJESH BINDAL J. **** On August 17, 2009, while issuing notice, following contentions of petitioner were recorded:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR in question was registered on the complaint of Lovely Singh on July 2, 2009. It is specifically stated in the FIR that the complainant had seen the persons who were involved in the incident and can recognize them if they come before him. The petitioner is resident of the same village and is well known to the complainant. In case the complainant could recognize the accused he could very well name the petitioner in the FIR itself. The petitioner was named nearly one month after registration of the FIR which is just to harass him.” Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner has already been investigated. Considering the arguments raised by the petitioner as has been noticed above, in my opinion, a case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. Accordingly, the interim bail granted on 17.8.2009 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) 5.10.2009 JUDGE Reema