1 ca4608-10+ agk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4608 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.219 OF 1996 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4610 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.221 OF 1996 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4612 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.223 OF 1996 Pandit Hari Ghuge D.H. Ambadas Pandit Ghuge & Others ..Applicants. Versus City Industrial Development Corporation Limited ..Respondent. Mr.A.J. Ahuja for the applicant. Mrs.Geeta Mulekar for the CIDCO Ms.S.V. Sonawane, AGP for the State. Ms.Jyoti Chavan, Advocate present on notice. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.A. Sayed, JJ. DATE : 12th August, 2011. P.C. : 1. These civil applications are taken out by the claimants seeking modification of the order dated 27th February 2009, whereby the original order passed on 31st January 2008 was modified. 2 ca4608-10+ 2. On 27th February 2009, order dated 31st January 2008 was modified on the basis of a praecipe filed by Ms.Jyoti Chavan, Advocate. Counsel for the State Government as also counsel for the claimants state that the praecipe filed by Ms.Jyoti Chavan, Advocate contained several incorrect, if not false statements and that Ms.Jyoti Chavan, Advocate could not file praecipe on behalf of some of the claimants, as she had not filed vakalatnama on behalf of those claimants. 3. Ms.Jyoti Chavan, Advocate appearing in person tendered unconditional apology for filing a praecipe which contained several incorrect statements. She sought permission to withdraw the praecipe and offered to pay costs of Rs.10,000/- for obtaining wrong order on 27th February 2009 on the basis of a praecipe filed by her which contained several incorrect statements. Accordingly, the apology tendered by Ms.Jyoti Chavan, Advocate is accepted and the praecipe filed by her is allowed to be withdrawn, subject to her deposit with the Kirtikar Law Library a sum of Rs.10,000/- within one week from today. Ms.Jyoti Chavan, Advocate undertakes to pay the said amount of Rs.10,000/- to Kirtikar Law Library within one week from today. Undertaking is accepted. 4. In these circumstances, order dated 27th February 2009 is recalled. In view of the recalling of the order dated 27th February 2009, counsel for the claimants does not press all the above civil applications. 5. All these civil applications are accordingly disposed off as not pressed. No costs. (A.A. Sayed, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)