IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 1ST JUNE 2009 / 11TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 14973 of 2009(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SHAJAN ABRAHAM, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.ABRAHAM, CHERIVUPURAYIDAM HOUSE, KARAKKANDI, KUPPADI P.O., KUPPADI VILLAGE, SULTHAN BATHERY TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.GEORGE(PUTHIYIDAM) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SULTHAN BATHERY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REP. BY SECRETARY, SULTHAN BATHERY P.O., WAYANAD DISTRICT. 2. TALUK SURVEYOR, TALUK OFFICE, SULTHAN BATHERY, SULTHAN BATHERY P.O., WAYANAD DISTRICT. 3. TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, SULTHAN BATHERY, WAYANAD. BY GP MATHEW VADAKKEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, J ........................................... WP(C).NO. 14973 OF 2009 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 1st DAY OF JUNE, 2009 JUDGMENT Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader on behalf of the respondents 2 and 3. Notice to first respondent dispensed with, preserving its right to move for review of this judgment, if aggrieved. 2. The petitioner applied for permission to put up a boundary wall. The Panchayat authority wanted the petitioner to produce the survey sketch since there is a channel or drain (thodu) adjacent to his property. He says that he has produced Ext.P5. The first respondent has, therefore, to take up application of the petitioner and issue a decision thereon. If the necessary documents called for as per Ext.P6 have been produced, a decision shall be taken and issued in accordance with law, within a period of three weeks of the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment and a copy of this writ petition. All other issues left open. THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE lgk/2/6