1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10641 OF 2009 Smt. Vanita M. Sonawadekar & Ors. ...Petitioners. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. T.V.Mhatugade, adv. For the Petitioners. Mr. S.R.Nargolkar, AGP For the Respondent/State. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : 17th December , 2009 P.C. 1 Matter was mentioned. 2 With consent of the parties, matter taken up and heard forthwith. 3 Petitioners are project affected persons. According to the petitioner no.1, he was entitled to 1 H 2R but he was allotted 61 R. Balance is 41 R. Similarly, Petitioner No.2 was entitled to 1 H 2 R and he has been allotted 60 R and the remaining balance is 40R. Petitioners are, therefore, entitled to balance as referred to earlier. Both the petitioners have made separate applications to the Respondent No.2 on 4th September, 2009. 2 3 Considering the above, we direct the respondent no.2 to consider and dispose off petitioners’ pending applications within six weeks from today. 4 With the above observations, petition stands disposed off. (J.H. BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)