IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.22858 OF 2009 ASHUTOSH KUMAR, SON OF LATE RAGHUBIR RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SAIN CHAPRA DEVANAND, P.S. KANTI, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 15.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The case is under section 366 A of the Indian Penal Code. From the statement of the victim-girl recorded under Section 164 of the Cr. P.C. annexed as Annexure-4 to the supplementary affidavit it appears that the main allegation is against one Pawan Kumar Rai. The allegation against petitioner is omnibus and general in nature. It is pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioner that some evidence has come during investigation that victim-girl and Pawan Kumar Rai had been seen going away on the bi- cycle. Said Pawan Kumar Rai has been allowed bail by this Court as is evident from Annexure-3 with the main petition. Considering the above facts and circumstances, this application is allowed. Let petitioner (Ashutosh Kumar) be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees - 2 - ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in Kanti P.S. Case No.63/2004 with conditions as laid down in sub-section (3) of Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as may be applicable and also that one of the bailors shall be a close relation of the petitioner. In case of breach of any of the conditions at any stage to the satisfaction of the concerned court below, it shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner and take steps for his arrest. B.T (J.N. Singh, J.)