IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1118 of 2008 (M/S) Arun Kumar Hari. .……… Petitioner Versus Pawan Kumar Hari & others. .……… Respondents Mr. Arvind Vashishth, Advocate for the petitioner. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. After hearing Mr. Arvind Vashishth, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, I feel disinclined to interfere with the impugned order, but do wish to observe that the two suits pending between the parties are being delayed inordinately, either because of the delaying tactics being adopted by the parties or because of the lacklustre approach of the learned trial court. While disposing of this writ petition, I direct the learned trial court to ensure that all steps are taken by it to dispose of both the suits very, very expeditiously. Actually, the trial court may conduct the proceedings on weekly basis unless, for reasons to be recorded in writing, it becomes either difficult or impossible to do so. Rebuttal evidence by the petitioner, if desired to be led, shall be permitted to be led by the trial court and suitable extension in time shall be granted. (V.K. Gupta, C. J.) 10.07.2008 G