IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5037 of 2009 HARENDRA RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 21.04.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The claim in this application is with regard to appointment on the post of Shiksha Mitra for the year 2005. The allegation is of irregularity in appointments made ignoring better candidature of the petitioner. The appointment was for eleven months whereafter it was inchoate right to be renewed or not to be renewed. The petitioner has come to this Court based on certain enquiry reports of the authorities. The enquiry reports and the writ petition both are well beyond eleven months contractual period for which the petitioner claimed to be considered for appointment. To that extent no relief can be granted to the petitioner on inchoate right and that too after a period for which the claim is made has run out. To that extent there is no merit in this writ application and it is rejected to that extent. The issue however of any irregular appointment made in the year 2005 and which fructified as Panchayat Shikshak on 1.7.2006 is entirely a different issue. Once the petitioner raised the issue and the authorities have found illegalities / irregularities in the appointment of such Shiksha Mitra such an enquiry has to be taken to its logical conclusion in accordance with law with order of termination of the concerned, if necessary, in law. The application is disposed with the observations to the extent indicated. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)