IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 4847 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision: 30.10.2009 State Bank of India and others ....Petitioners. Versus Makan Singh and another ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners. None for respondent No.1. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. In this revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the defendant-petitioners have challenged the order dated 15.6.2007 passed by the trial court whereby the application filed by the plaintiff for permission to lead secondary evidence, was allowed. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he has received verbal instructions that the parties to the litigation have compromised the dispute and the suit out of which, the present revision petition has arisen stands withdrawn. He further states that the present revision petition may be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous, however, liberty be granted to the petitioners to move an application for revival of the same in case the verbal instructions are found to be incorrect. C.R. No. 4847 of 2007 -2- In view of the above, the present revision petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. It shall, however, be open to the petitioners to move an application for revival of the revision petition in case the verbal instructions are found to be incorrect. October 30, 2009 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE