IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28321 of 2010 1. DEBU PASWAN, S/o Late Lochan Paswan. 2. Ram Shreshth Paswan @ Ram Shreshth Paswan @ Ram Sudishtha Paswan, S/o Late Rital @ Dukhi Paswan. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 05. 01.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 395, 397 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that there has been no recovery from the possession of the petitioner No. 2 which fact will be verified by the trial Court. In case, the petitioner’s name transpired only on the confessional statement of the co-accused and there has been no recovery from his possession, let the petitioners, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Darbhanga in connection with S.Tr. No. 308 of 2009 arising out of Raiyam P.S. Case No. 29 of 2008 (G.R. No. 3175 of 2008) subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners and 2 the other bailor shall be the wife/brother of the petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioners. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)