IN THE HIGH coUR‘r or micm‘URE OF qwwmsgzaxm m BIASPUR ‘ ; ‘ I 1 r) w.»p-.No.2L/7é 0F. :2001 EHE @IESEIEUEIWE amalé Q Peti§;oner : Mohamed Israel -'— aged about 65 years s/o. Late ShrJ. Abdul Samad Resident of Qr No 12-B Street NO 21 Sector l, Bmlai Dlstt. Durg 1c G ) Ver sus i 1\/S/t:;.e of mhattisgarh I kcting through - Secreeary Revenue Department Government of mhattisgarh DKS Bhavan, Raipur (C.G ) Oallectorz ' [41' ' istriet Durg, &C.G.). “" ‘ Nazul O£ficer District Burg (C G ) aTah eirlaavr (Elaizui ) i CG Re sEonde nts APPROPRIATE WRIT, DIRECTION ANDZGR ORDER —‘—_—-—— u- ——— —————— —————--_- , K D pistrgcvt: :mgg J g 2 gnaw W mw?uvzw%i ,V v.:........m ................................................ WWW Wm W’ ‘ agwmm XI—HC-ZZ 13.03.2002 Heard Shri K.A.Ansari,. lealntxl counsel for ths petitioner aild Shri Gautam Bhaduri, leaned Go‘Lt. Advocate for £he respondents I State. The petitioner has in this p6 tition sought for issge‘of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to restore possession of nazul lands mentioyt‘led in the petition by cancelling the lease of the persons to whom illegal patta has been granted ’ and directed the respondents to immediately grant patta of another land to the petitioner for restaring the business ‘of Cycle and nekshaw shop. (’V‘m t The petitioner has stated in para 3.3 of the petition that the ‘r is likely to take some time and 4.: n _ ' i therefore the petitioner submitted applications / representations to i id 'V the various authorities for grant f patta at a suitable place as the civil litigation filed by the petition e dispossession were being led to starvation. The applications / 1 presentations having evoked no a K .P. Minorities Commission and i r: :‘i‘l r r l Wm WW 200 \ W ................................................ _ WW %®m $m’m \ A2- / Human Rights Commission as als3 to the Ministers of the Govt. of Madhya Pradesh. Though the complaints were sent to /the respondents for necessary action, no plot has been allotted to the petitioner to restart the business, hence this petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted" that the ' petitioner has filed applicaticn] Durg and the same is pending. The Collector has not passed any \ onier till today. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I t am of the opinion that it is appropriate to direct the Collector, Durg to consider the representation / application tiled by the petitioner, if any, and dispose of the same W receipt of Th6 copy of this order. I the representation / application \ is not med before him the liberty i re$erved to the petitioner to file > the same before the Collector and irect the Collector to dispose of the same. Accordingly, the petition is sposed of. The Collector, 'Durg i is directed to consider the represe tation / application tiled by the petitioner, if any, and dispose of same Within one month from e f the a lic I ation representation to the Collector, XIvHC-22 s ord i er. w representation Eed by the petitioner is not found, the petitioner is permitted to file the same within» 7 Collector is directed to dispose of the same Within one month .fmm thc date of filing of thc applic : petiu'oner. Subbu/Soma Ordered accordingly. Parties ale entitled for certiii; onemonth from today and the ation / representation by the 3' Vr' :d copy of this order. ~\ \ sci/fr Ex {Ihief Justice 7;§l:‘‘;p‘’4v A A A AA . ’\ t ‘ Mme