:1: 169.10-fca bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.169 OF 2010 IN PETITION NO.B-59 OF 2004 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.97 OF 2010 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.169 OF 2010 IN PETITION NO.B-59 OF 2004 Vijay Narendranath Kapoor & Anr. ..Appellants Vs. Mrs.Kavita Sanjay Kapoor & Anr. ..Respondents CIVIL APPLICATION NO.335 OF 2010 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST) NO. OF 2010 IN M.J.PETITION NO.A-1308 OF 2004 Sanjay Vijay Kapoor ..Appellant Vs. Mrs.Kavita Sanjay Kapoor & Anr. ..Respondents Mr.Kunal Cheema for appellants. Ms.Indrayani M.Koparkar for respondents. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & R.G.KETKAR,JJ. DATE :- JANUARY 19, 2011 P.C. Heard. Perused appeals. 2. The Consent Terms presented on 22nd December, 2010 were explained to the parties. The parties agree to abide by the said Consent Terms. We have also perused the same and record that they are reasonable and acceptable in law. The marriage dispute is resolved in terms of Consent Terms. The impugned order and decree stand modified in terms of the Consent Terms. :2: 169.10-fca 3. Needless to mention that no orders are necessary in the pending Civil Application/s, in view of the disposal of substantive appeal. Both the appeals stand disposed of in terms of this order with no order as to costs. (R.G.KETKAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)