IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41704 of 2010 1. RAM DEO YADAV 2. Rajmati Devi 3. Ramanuj Yadav 4. Manti Devi 5. Bindu KLumari ……………………… Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.03.2011 Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that she does not press the application in so far as petitioners 1 and 3 are concerned as they have been taken into custody and this application on their behalf has become infructuous. This application is accordingly dismissed with regard to them. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners 2, 4 and 5 and the learned counsel for the State. The submission on behalf of petitioners 2, 4 & 5, the mother-in-law, the wife of the brother of the husband and the unmarried sister of the husband is of generalized allegation. Considering the nature of the allegations, the past events mentioned therein, the Court is not persuaded that petitioner no. 2 is also entitled to the privilege of anticipatory bail on the aforesaid submission. Keeping in mind that petitioner no. 4 herself stands in the position of daughter-in-law like the deceased and the petitioner no. 5 is unmarried girl, let them surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM Jehanabad in Kurtha PS Case No. 34 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner no. 2 shall be considered by the court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. Snkumar/ (Navin Sinha,J.)