Civil Revision No.6812 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6812 of 2011 Date of Decision : 08.11.2011 Gobind Singh .......Petitioner Versus Amarjit Singh .......Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr. A.S. Syan, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** JITENDRA CHAUHAN, J. (ORAL) The petitioner has preferred this revision petition challenging the order dated 03.08.2011, passed by the learned trial Court, whereby the application moved by the plaintiff-petitioner for discharging the Patwari Halqua, has been dismissed. It has been averred in the petition that in order to delay the proceedings, the defendant-respondent filed the application to summon the Patwari to prove the record which he had earlier failed to do so. It is contended that the revenue record as well as the Jamabandis are per se admissible and Patwari should not be summoned at this stage. 1 Civil Revision No.6812 of 2011 While dismissing the said application, the learned trial Court has observed that as the defendant-respondent claimed that the entries are wrong and are not as per the revenue record, it is for him to prove the same by leading cogent evidence. It is further observed that for the said purpose, the Halqa Patwari is the concerned person and nothing stops the defendant from examining him. In the facts and circumstances of the present case, this Court is of the considered opinion that no fault can be found with the findings recorded by the learned trial Court while dismissing the application. The evidence of the Revenue Patwari would lend credence and authenticity to the documents in question. There is no miscarriage of justice if the Patwari is allowed to be examined as DW. The Court, in exercise of superintending powers, will not ordinarily interfere except in cases of grave and otherwise irreparable injustice. In this view of the matter, the present revision petition, being devoid of any merit, is dismissed in limine. ( JITENDRA CHAUHAN ) 08.11.2011 JUDGE atulsethi Note: Whether to be referred to reporter ? Yes/No 2