IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE‘ AT BILASPUR (C.6.) WRIT PETITION Article 227 NO. 390 OF 2011 PETITIONER Chi‘rr‘a Rekha W/o.La‘re Shri Ghasimm Applicant aged abouf 55 Years. residence of village - Nagjhar‘, Tahsil— Gurur, Dis’rf: Durg ( 6.6.) VERSUS RESPONDENTs/i. Reliance General Insurance Company L‘rd. Non—applicanfs Ravi Bhawan, Near Jay Sfambh Raipur, Distt— Raipur ( C.G.) We 2. Afmaram S/o. Late Shri Ghasiram, aged abouf 32 Years. .3. Smf. Godawari D/o. La’re sShri Ghasiram, aged about 29 Years. Sm’r. Parmila Bai D/o. Late s$hri Ghasiram, aged about 29 Years. 2 To 4 are residence of village - Nagjhar, Tahsil— Gurur, Distt— Durg ( 6.6.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUEANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT. m; coUR'r OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (227) No. 390/2011 SB:- HON’BLE SHRI N.K. AGARWAL, J PRESENT :— Shri Sunil Sahu, Advocate, for petitioner. ORAL ORDER (25-1-2011) This petition is directed against the order 6-10-2010 (Annexure P-l) passed by the Additional Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (FTC), Baloud, Distt. Durg in M.J.C. No. 105/2010. Facts of the case in brief are that learned Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Balod passed an award dated 6—1—2010 in Claim Case No. 94/2008 of Rs. 97,122/- in favour of the husband of the petitioner against the Insurance Company/respondent No. 1 but thereafter 0n 25—3-2010 the husband of the petitioner Ghasiram died and the petitioner filed an application for .direction to disburse the amount 0f compensation to her and other legal heirs/respondents No. 2 to 4. Vide impugned order, said application has been rejected and the court has directed the petitioner to furnish succession certificate. It is trite law that if a claimant is died after an award is passed, the amount of compensation becomes the estate of deceased, and therefore, learned trial Court has not committed any illegality in directing the petitioner t0 file succession certificate for the amount deposited, warranting interference of this Court under Article 227 of the constitution of India. m PETITIONER Chitra Rekha Versus RESPONDENTS Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. and others 51/ / It is well settled principle of law that this Court, in exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, should refrain itself from interfering with the order passed by the Court below except in such cases where perversity, illegality or jurisdictional error is writ large on the face of the record, which is not in the present case. Therefore, the petition being without substance is liable to be and is hereby dismissed. Sd/— N.K. Agrawal Judge