IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.5564-M of 2010 Date of Decision:6.7.2010 Dr. B.S. Sehrawat .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. J.S. Lalli, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, A.A.G. Haryana. Mr. H.S. Giani, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the short reply by way of affidavit of Krishan Kumar, Deputy Superintendent of Police, (HQ), Yamuna Nagar on behalf of respondent No.1 stating therein that the petitioner has not been challaned nor arrested, nor kept in column No.2 of the final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 6.7.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE