IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 5139 OF 1993 PETITION NO. 5139 OF 1993 PETITION NO. 5139 OF 1993 Shridhar Madhav Lele & anr. ...Petitioner versus Tahasildar, Bhiwandi Dist. Thane & ors. . ... Respondent. -------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada ) Court‘s or Judge‘s Orders or directions and ) Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri C.G.Gavnekar for the petitioner Shri K.S.Patil for Respdt. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & D.B. D.B. D.B. BHOSALE, JJ. BHOSALE, JJ. BHOSALE, JJ. DTAED; DTAED; DTAED; 9TH SEPT., 2005 9TH SEPT., 2005 9TH SEPT., 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The controversy in this petition is squarely covered by our decision given in W.P.No.5418/94 along with several other petitions. This petition also is therefore liable to be disposed of by recording the statement of the State Government which has unequivocally stated that it shall not take for the period mentioned in the impugned letter any coercive action for recovery of levy rice. ****