1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10 OF 2008 Smt.Nirmala Thakurdas Lilwani .. Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr.J.S.Chandnani for the petitioner Mr.C.R.Sonawane, A.G.P. for the respondent nos.1 to 4 CORAM : J.N.PATEL CORAM : J.N.PATEL CORAM : J.N.PATEL & & & SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DATED : 7TH JANUARY, 2008 DATED : 7TH JANUARY, 2008 DATED : 7TH JANUARY, 2008 P.C.: 1. Heard. 2. Ld.A.G.P. Mr.C.R.Sonawane waives service for the respondents. 3. The petition can be disposed of at the stage of admission itself. The petitioner has approached this court seeking a limited relief in the nature of writ of mandamus to the respondent 2 no.2 i.e. the Authorised Chief Settlement Commissioner, Maharashtra State, Mumbai to decide the Revision Application No.26 of 2007 in accordance with law within a period of 2 months. 3. This court is not made aware as to how many such Revision Applications are pending before the respondent no.2 and what is the work load before him. Therefore, in the given facts and circumstances, we will highly appreciate if respondent no.2 disposes of the Revision Application on or before 30th June, 2008. In case for any reason whatsoever, respondent no.2 is not able to dispose of the matter, he may move this court for extension of time. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. The petitioner to communicate this order to respondent no.2. ( J.N. PATEL, J ) ( J.N. PATEL, J ) ( J.N. PATEL, J ) ( SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J ) ( SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J ) ( SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J )