1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY : AURANGABAD BENCH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 47 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6587 OF 2008 Sunil s/o. Babasaheb Dange - - - Petitioner versus Bhagwant Maruti Surase and others. - - - Respondents Shri Amol Gandhi, Advocate for petitioner. Shri S. R. Gorde Patil, Advocate for respondents. CORAM : B. R. GAVAI, J. Dated : 6th October 2009 PER COURT: 1. It is the contention of the petitioner that the respondent No.1 has not complied with the order dated 24-2-1999 which is confirmed by this Court vide order dated 14-11-2008. It is the specific contention that though new names have been inserted in the register, the said register does not show the date with effect from which the petitioner would be treated as member. 2 2. Shri Dhorde, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.3, submits that in the register it is specifically mentioned that the petitioners are included as members in pursuance to the order dated 24-2-1999 passed by the Assistant Registrar. In so far as payment of costs is concerned, he submits that civil application is pending in this Court for accepting costs. 3. Since the Civil Application for deposit of costs is already pending in the Court, I am not inclined to invoke contempt jurisdiction for non-payment of costs. 4. In so far as second submission is concerned, in the register it is clearly mentioned that the names are included as per order of the Assistant Registrar dated 24-2-1999. The order of the Assistant Registrar clearly states that the petitioners are entitled to be member with effect from 31-3-1997. It is thus clear that in view of the order passed by the Assistant Registrar, petitioners would be entitled to be included in the register with effect from 31-3-1997. 5. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for interference in the contempt jurisdiction. Petition is dismissed with 3 the aforesaid observations. ( B. R. GAVAI, J. ) pnk/wp4709