IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3170 of 2009 SHAMBHU MISHRA, Son of Late Hriday Chandra Mishra, Resident of village – Adharpur, P.S. – Ghanshyampur, District – Darbhanga. ……. Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Commissioner cum Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The District Magistrate, Darbhanga, District – Darbhanga. 3. The Block Development Officer, Ghanshyampur Block, P.s. – Ghanshyampur, District – Darbhanga. 4. The Gram Panchayat Raj, Gonaun, through Mukhiya, P.s. – Ghanshyampur, District – Darbhanga. 5. The Panchayat Teacher’s Appointment Penal Committee, through its Chairman cum Mukhia, Gram Panchayat Gonaun, P.S. – Ghanshyampur, District – Darbhanga. 6. The Panchayat Sewak cum Panchayat Secretary, Gonaun Gram Panchayat, P.S. – Ghanshyampur, District – Darbhanga. ……… Respondents. ----------- 2. 16.3.2009 The dispute is with regard to the appointment on the post of Primary Panchayat Teacher in Gonaun Gram Panchayat in the district of Darbhanga. Petitioner claims that he had higher marks than other three persons, who were selected and the matter was enquired into by the Block Development Officer and certain illegality were found in the selection. Petitioner wants a direction now upon the respondents to issue an appointment letter and also to appoint him on one of the posts from unreserved and untrained category. Learned counsel for the petitioner also brings to my notice the decision dated 30.01.2009 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 11914 of 2008 which was the case of one Malik Prasad, one of the candidates also seeking employment in the same Gram - 2 - Panchayat. After hearing the parties, the court was pleased to dispose of the writ application with a direction upon the District Magistrate, Darbhanga, Panchayat teachers Panel Committee, Gonaun, Mukhiya as well as Panchayat Secretary of the said Panchayat to take further steps for appointment of panchayat teachers against the vacancies of the untrained teachers on the basis of the counseling done under 2006 rules. The present dispute is identical and similar in nature. The present writ application is disposed of in terms of the order dated 30.01.2009 passed in the case of Malik Prasad that the claim of the petitioner shall also be considered by the above noted respondents and functionaries within the same time frame fixed by the court in the above matter. Petitioner has liberty to furnish a copy of the order passed in the case of Malik Prasad along with a copy of the present order for due deliberation and appropriate decision. DKS/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)